The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2003-03013 - PLT2003-00002 II'" .. . -.-Jl- ~ CASE #: -\......- _ __ DATE RECEIVED:. ' RECEIVED BY (staff initial~,): __.___ ATU\S PAGE #: ___om_&. ",___ Z,::NING DISTRICT: ~1? LAND USE C'._ASSIFICATION: ~-=-. SURROUND:t'.JG USES OF ADJACfNT PROPERTIES NORTH: L SOUTH: ---.------ WEST: ___..._ EAST: o Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 . u~ o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans o SUBMIT APPLICATiON FEE $ 100.00 * NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) f.I.L..E FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICA.'11C)N. Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Intill Project (Revic,ed 11/05/(2) - PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A.J.':fPLlCANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLlCANTNAME:_ Gb:lIZ..b-z._ E PA-PPltj ...__._____..___ MAILlNGADDRESS:._~~~ J~rJl ~v-:to.~ bG....-~~~-:CJ..... ~v s37fo/ 2-- 9J' - ~ 15' .u:::::._ 1 I PHONE NUMBER: 7 ~ 7 -le I \.f b FAX NUMBER: G c~5... _Ji.QQO:..L- (Must include ~LL owners) U IJ PROPERTY OWNER(S): AGENT NAME G,,-,,<sl!. (, - ~~ ~ b~ (lcc,J;; \fr. MAILING ADDRESS: 2--'170 S "1-- '31---. r..( CI~o.rvJ~..:yf F(....- J3)(/ PHONE NUMBER: 4'01- b'lf>7 FAX NUMBER: 2-9'1-m.J CELL NUMBER: "101- 6Y(,.<J E-MAILADDRES~:-:~G'~ 8) V4...4/~C"-11.. ~+ ... .~ .. B., PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Secti~n._ 4-202.A) _J1~... . STREET ADDRESS 331\ U 1Ji- S-f--. ,j I C)t;...r~~ I fi ~;!("r (If} je f.'-I!!Jil J kl'~~' 'G. ~ ~, N S l(jf';J Yo.! LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL SIZE: (acres, square feet). A JFf ~ PROPOSEDUSE(S)ANDSIZE(S): ~ ~~~ k-b,,__~ ~J....J.... . r~{t.~.I\~ (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) f 11---( PJUY\ _~w.. DESCRIPTIONOFREQUEST(S): .7..5 '~J.1.~cvr1 ~b~~.. i&-'- ~ ~-:JO(~ (include all requeste~~iations; e.g. reduction1n required number of parking spaces, specific US(j, etc.) ~~ Lot w.lM1-; ~~glcms fcr1 ~--20J //)0' ~ ~~ Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residential Infill Project- City of Clearwater t . . GOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A P~s,vIOUSL Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT "I. UEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ...A- (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) '9( SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in wtJich it is located.<::: b I J~' J1 -L ,-,0 - , J. 1-.1.' " I. J.. VJ, _ ..L JI A , ~ ~~( 1 ~ ~ ~TlJ ~T St~J~j Vl-~O\~UrM ~J 11..0rr:_~ ~oWJlJ l.P- ~-. ..eJ6 ( 'H d.:J...I'~ . P ~ ~ k 'r- ~ (l.J'.fe:. l'......~ ~I-. JJv..JnJ Il-: o.A-- GAd ~(,~';J~ . 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate developrent and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly ;mp:;'the""'"elhe'e~f t..-o.-..J V~ ~iu ~ ~~" o-,-fI. ""-"""- u.~utJ w~ J.J . ~ M ~c'1 ~ 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed ~~~<~~~1-.~~ ::-~ proposed d vel m is designed <2.~imiZe tr. IC cong ti n. ~ (ktl~7 f-hrw.f 4. 1/ j - 5. Tc=~m:~tr'3~~~T:~od;:t~pa~od~'tm'"t ~~J (~ -V.A-. c. ~ 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic C!nd olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ~o..41-l U ~ ,sLJ..l b ~d-~ cl (lL~Jl- f.o ,?i J <YN1 <J... d ~J.n Ji.os . 1 o Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. ~ "~ skt{ k '''-~c4nJ Wit/.....+ "'-'-.;..~ ~ "-tJ..f';rd .JJ....L ~Ju(~~ .~ o..t~ 6 tn-~cf.etl ~.-f.o 9.XJJ-h~ lc+ ~~. Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearw ater ... . . , 2: The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) ~ck .\J{j~ ~~. '. ::.oc~~. Jfi,t^U~~ -10 ~oc.ccc 4 t1.IItp\AvJ _~_ '_~ I~ ~~J ~~~ ----,-u-- ) . 3. The uses within the residential infill proje~t are otherwise perm~tted in :~e City of Clearwa~er. ( I '\J - I )" '"t. '.(L:h~lLclt:-. ""),J 1"- -1 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. ~'< ~l n '~J- (nJ ,..rA:f- 5. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parkin are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) o STORMWA TER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations o COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable o COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearw ater -r . . F.. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; ~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed); ~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ~ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ~ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as a licableo G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and oftsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ~ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: _ Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses. o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Oftsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater .. . . ~ 11. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) o LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline; Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); I rrigation notes. o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (color rendering if possible); o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project. o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). o Reduced signage proposal (8 Y2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knoYfledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ' Sw n to and subscribed before me this I ~ day of C\ r -, A~D. 20_ t~.ao.c:ILQ( by t1 S , who is ~rsonally kn~ has as Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater ... . . - AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: h~O~<"- ~ ~~~l. 1 (Names of al roperty owners) 1. That (I am/we are) the o~[(s! and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): ~ 3\ t <06 UI:SJ.. tJ. I ctW-uJcd-..av I F<- 3S.~~ I 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a reques~ for a: (describe request) . i f ~"~~~ de~d ~~~ ~ 7..,r1 J-Ms. 3. ~~ t"c..~-tl-i Tr.- ~/~ That the undersigned (has/ha~ appointed and (does/do) appoint: (';e~-r.:S e__ 6. .. ~Q.J as~their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (lIwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true a. ~d'rrect. ~ -~.~ Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before f\1e the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by JJ. LVc.Ji- , 2.oc3 personally appeared -e Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the a /2- day of who having been first duly sworn Notary Public My Commission Expires: S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewl2002 Formslsingle family residential infiff application 2002.doc Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater ~ I Od_1 (.; /2- L-'J"' ~ CITY OF CLEA~ A TER APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROV AL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRA nON MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VENUE, 2nd FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 ~' ) : . ... r:;.-C/;? 6 ti::-- //1;) lJ 4 S ~ -Z~ ~ :58 \v' cL L/L?..llC-"'S,. _767 - (, I LtG P&j1~~ \.: 1.::::(.- 0CJ\.iTC So. : -; Z 7--7 67 C I 41c- /j;unfof'J7 C.iC-G-oTT7 <:. Z 7703 (;;,) 'lidS; JJ C t~-J7<-VI}fi-'lL p( 3'~ '7 C" I '12. 7 tf-(/j (c /f0 cy FAX NUMBER ."7 2. 7 '7 f:-) 4-- f;; 9 ~\"I., 7;. PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER APPLICANT'S NAME GCVIC.&e:- ADDRESS Z -7 c:, - G::~ .--::> <.. PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. ~YJl~~~J~:Jl2.. ,who is personally known to Ten (10) copies of the preliminary plat must be submitted. a1 . C~JJ1. f?t- .5"51{.j FAX NUMBER : 0.1 ') (If'lJJ~(';;'}7N It ;; ~ 'I fp / FAX NUMBER: z---~' S. - 8 f3E \ STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before ~ this li day of t-(At2 r ,--I , A.D., to me and/or ~rns me or has produced ~L 1i c.J.3D - OL")~~ - ~ - ,l,~ 1- a~~. '""', 6<0-" -0(, . . ~LJ4\P-- N ry Public my c mmis ion expi JOHN V. SCHOOnER No. DO 008188 ll~~~I.D. The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; ~f1W IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; Jb~' -' , J ~ .~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND ~ GE L1NU. ij 1 Mf!.ri g 2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; J;' _ ~ '003 il~r~", , C'r'.. ,./ to~" .':(, r CI { ofi"II'i:.:..iJr . lifWvltlER wvc~ NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; PROPOSED STREET NAMES; NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; Page 1 .... . . DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOllOWING: THE OVERAll PLAT AND EACH lOT STREETS RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS; COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY. Page 2 CL WCoverSheet . . PL T2003-00002 3311 66TH ST Date Received: 3/19/2003 VEL VENT OS WEST ZONING DISTRICT: LDR LAND USE: RL ATLAS PAGE: 178A i /POD. ()-c) ~ro)rJ]i ,:: i. i' < . n ) MAR 1 ~ t.,._'.: ~UUt :JLANrJfi\,-: Cln"" ., ._- CL WCoverSheet . . FLS2003-03013 331166TH ST Date Received: 3/19/2003 VEL VENT OS WEST ZONING DISTRICT: LDR LAND USE: RL ATLAS PAGE: 178A ~ ry f IE ( ~J/Jyrrr. .. ~i\ MAllt9;t~. ;.A1~NIi\G< . I elT ""'."L ".., ..,.../ _1.9F Ct EA'-Mw.r 'Vic.!.,T Sv"" -._~ l01I;) \\00.00 ... . ~ \ CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW June 23, 2003 fILl; Mr. George G. Pappas & Mr. Anthony Ciccotti Jr. 29703 69th Street North Clearwater, FL 33761 l r 1 JI RE: Development Order - Case FLS2003-030 13/PL T2003-00002 - 3311 66th Street. Dear Mr. Pappas / Mr. Ciccotti: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On April 17, 2003, the Development Review Committee reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit detached dwellings within the Low Density Residential District with a reduction of the side setbacks from 15 feet to 7.5-10 feet (to structure and pool/enclosure), for reduction to the minimum lot width requirements from 100 feet to 70 feet (lots 1 &2) and 80 feet (lots 3 & 4) and for reductions of lot area from 20,000 square feet to a minimum 11,100 square feet. as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B and Preliminary Plat approval for five lots. The Development Review Committee (DRC) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Residential Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-103.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. Prior to building permit, a $200 per unit Recreation Facility impact fee is due. 2. Prior to building permit, evidence of SWFWMD Permit or exemption is required. 3. Traffic Impact Fees to be paid prior to certificate of occupancies. 4. A "Tree Preservation Plan" will be required prior to Building Permit. This plan must show root pruning and tree barricade and tree canopy lines. Additional space will be required at the top of bank at the 26" Live Oak at the SE comer of the pond. Rick Albee will assist with the design of the Preservation Plan, please call for an appointment (727-562-4741). 5. The north side setback of lot one is required a minimum of ten feet. 6. Final Plat must be recorded prior to issuance of any permits. BRJAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ^,"JD AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . Page 2 3311 66th Street Velventos West I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development. The approval is based on, and must adhere to the site plan and application dated June 9, 2003. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (June 23, 2003). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Please be aware that an appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated, pursuant to Section 4-502.A, by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence at or prior to the Development Review Committee meeting (April 17, 2003). The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on July 3, 2003. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist, at 727-562-4604. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. Very truly yours, ~.~ FilE Cynthia Tarapani, AICP Planning Director S:\P/anning Department\C D B\Standard F/ex\Pending Cases\2 - Reviewed and Pending\lJ4-17-03 DRC\66th Street West 3311 Ve/ventos West\66th Street West 3311 Order. doc . . DRC Meeting Date: April 17, 2003 Case Number: PLT2003-00002 AND FLS2003-03013 Agenda Item: 11: 30 a.m. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FDrL ~ ~~"-:~~~ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: APPLICANT: AGENT: Mr. George E. Pappas Mr. Anthony Ciccotti, Jr. LOCATION: 3311 66th Street REQUEST: Preliminary Plat approval to create four new residential lots (PLT2003-00002) and Flexible Standard approval (FLS2003-03013) to reduce the side setbacks from 15 feet to 7.5 feet (to structure and pool/enclosure), for reduction to the minimum lot width requirements from 100 feet to 70 feet (lots 1 &2) and 80 feet (lots 3 & 4) and for reductions of lot area from 20,000 square feet to a minimum 11,100 square feet, under the provisions of Section 2- 203.C. PLANS REVIEWED: Site plan submitted by Mr. George E. Pappas. SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 1.88 acres; 81,892.8 square feet DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 278.80 feet by 294.92 feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Proposed Use: Vacant Four Single-Family residential units PLAN CATEGORY: RL, Residential Low Classification ZONING DISTRICT: LDR, Low Density Residential District ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Single-family residential West: Single-family residential East: Single-family residential South: Florida Power Right of Way DRAFT Staff Report - Development Review Committee - March 13, 2003 - Case FLS2003-02008 - Page I . . CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings, dominate the immediate vicinity. ANAL YSIS: The 1.88-acre site is located at the northeast corner of 66th Street and Vel vent os Drive. It is located within a residentially developed area. The area developed to the west is located in un-incorporated Pinellas county and typically have six foot side setbacks. The area developed to the north and east is with the City of Clearwater and typically have ten foot side setbacks. The site was previously developed with a single-family dwelling unit. Prior to annexation into the City of Clearwater the structure was demolished. The site, a corner lot with frontage along 66th Street and Velventos Drive, has an existing pond located at the southwest corner of the property and an area designated as wetlands along the east property line. The proposal includes platting the 1.88-acre site into five new lots. Four of the lots will be developed with single-family dwellings and the fifth will be the association's pond. The proposal also includes the reduction of the side setbacks from 15 feet to 7.5-10 feet (to structure and pool/enclosure), for reduction to the minimum lot width requirements from 100 feet to 70 feet (lots 1 &2) and 80 feet (lots 3 & 4) and for reductions of lot area from 20,000 square feet to a minimum 11,100 square feet. A six-foot fence exists along the side (north) property line of lot 1 and will continue to buffer neighboring properties from the proposed single-family dwelling. Jurisdictional wetlands exist along the east property line and require a 25-foot setback per section 3-907.A. The proposal does meet Code requirements. All applicable Code criteria have been met. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. A. COMPLIANCE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-102.1): STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? DENSITY 5 dwelling units per Vacant One dwelling Yes acre unit/per lot IMPERVIOUS 0.65 0.00 Varies Yes SURFACE RATIO (ISR) DRAFT Staff Report - Development Review Committee - March 13, 2003 - Case FLS2003-02008 - Page 2 . . B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-103.B): STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? LOT AREA N/A 81,892.8 square 11,101.6 to Yes (minimum) feet 27,644.4 square feet LOT WIDTH N/A 278.80 feet and 70 feet (lots 1 & 2) Yes (minimum) 294.92 feet 80 feet (lots 3 & 4) FRONT 10 - 25 feet Vacant 25 feet Yes SETBACK REAR o - 25 feet Vacant 25 feet plus Yes SETBACK SIDE o - 15 feet Vacant 7.5 feet to 10 feet Yes SETBACK HEIGHT 30 feet Vacant Unknown Unknown maximum PARKING One space per Vacant Two spaces Yes SPACES unit minimum C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-103.B): 1. Single-family, detached dwellings are the only permitted use eligible for residential infill project applications; The proposal includes platting and development of four residential lots with single-family dwellings. The proposal also includes the reduction of the side setbacks from 15 feet to 7.5-10 feet (to structure and pool/enclosure), for reduction to the minimum lot width requirements from 100 feet to 70 feet (lots 1 &2) and 80 feet (lots 3 & 4) and for reductions of lot area from 20,000 square feet to a minimum 11,100 square feet. 2. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards; The proposal requires deviations from the standards to be consistent with the character of the existing residential developments. The adjacent residential subdivisions are similarly zoned and were development with reduced lot sizes and lot widths. 3. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; DRAFT Staff Report - Development Review Committee - March 13, 2003 - Case FLS2003-02008 - Page 3 . . The proposal is similar in size and scale to other structures on surrounding properties in the neighborhood. The proposal will provide four new homes and will constitute an improvement to the site and the neighborhood as a whole. 4. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; The site is zoned Low Density Residential District and the proposed single-family dwellings will be in compliance with the zoning. 5. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent lands uses; Adjacent land uses are predominantly single-family residential dwellings. The subject sites are proposed to each be developed with a single-family dwelling and that use will not change with this proposal. The proposal is compatible with adjacent land uses. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; The proposal includes a significant increase in the area with the development of four new single-family dwellings. The proposal will result in homes similar in character to other homes in the neighborhood and will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; The proposal takes into consideration that there is a 25-foot vegetative buffer along the east property line measured from the boundary of the jurisdictional wetlands. This greatly impacts the development of the proposed Lot 4 and will reduce the buildable width of the lot by an additional 25 feet. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater as a whole by developing an existing vacant lot. The reduction in side setback areas is similar to other properties in the area. The request is for 7.5-10 foot side setbacks were the community characteristic of side setbacks is no less than 9.91 feet. The applicant has agreed to meet ala side setback on all properties that abut properties outside of the subdivision (lot one). D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. DRAFT Staff Report - Development Review Committee - March 13, 2003 - Case FLS2003-02008 - Page 4 e . The area is characterized with single-family dwellings similarly sized. It will provide a positive development for the area. The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Low Density Residential District. The sites are not similar in size and dimension to other properties in the area. The proposal is consistent and in harmony with coverage, density and setbacks of the adjacent properties. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The site is zoned Low Density Residential District and characterized by single-family dwellings. The character and intensity of the proposed development will be in compliance with that zoning classification. The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the District. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed single-family uses should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood and are permitted in the Low Density Residential District. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposal will have no effect on traffic congestion in the area. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. This criteria has been met. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on April 17, 2003. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat approval to create four new residential lots (PLT2003-00002) and Flexible Standard approval (FLS2003- 03013) to reduce the side setbacks from 15 feet to 7.5 feet (to structure and pool/enclosure) on all lots with the exception of lot one, the north side setback is approved from 15' to 10'; for reduction to the minimum lot width requirements from 100 feet to 70 feet (lots 1 &2) and 80 feet (lots 3 & 4) and for reductions of lot area from 20,000 square feet to a minimum 11,100 square feet While setbacks are minimum, structures shall not encroach into easements or vegetative buffers around wetlands. DRAFT Staff Report - Development Review Committee - March 13, 2003 - Case FLS2003-02008 - Page 5 . . Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project per Section 2-203.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of approval: 1. A $200 per unit Recreation Facility impact fee is due prior to building permit. 2. Prior to building permit, evidence of SWFWMD Permit or exemption is required. 3. Traffic Impact Fees to be paid prior to certificate of occupancies. 4. A "Tree Preservation Plan" will be required prior to Building Permit. This plan must show root pruning and tree barricade and tree canopy lines. Additional space will be required at the top of bank at the 26" Live Oak at the SE corner of the pond. Rick Albee will assist with the design of the Preservation Plan, please call for an appointment (727-562-4741). 5. Final Plat must be recorded prior to issuance of any permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist S:\Planning Department\C D BlStandard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\66th Street West 3311 Velventos West\66th st 3311 STAFF REPORT. doc DRAFT Staff Report - Development Review Committee - March 13, 2003 - Case FLS2003-02008 - Page 6 . . ~.,'TII,." ..~~~lOF Tiff ### .{~ \).,...,,##.....~~ \"Nit . ##......~~ ~~.' II,~. ~ C>.. .~~~~~ ~ r . ~ . '-c--, ~ - .... . . llIi '" . ...~'.~... ~~'- ..~~ ,.=-~:=...~.:.. :--I~ ...-' : . - --~ ;::;;::::~ -~~.-=.~~::~ "r-..'-'\ ":.~IA",;;;;i..~~\\\ ###,.)fTE~,.~~. '11'" CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PlANNING DEPARTMENT April 2, 2003 RE: REVISED NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 3311 66th STREET (PL T2003-00002 AND FLS2003-03013) To Surrounding Property Owners: You have previously received notice from the Planning department regarding the above application. This is a revised notice to include the lot area reduction as underlined below. As a property owner within 200 feet of 3311 66th Street, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development has been filed for that property. The request is to create four new residential lots and Flexible Standard approval (FLS2003-03013) to reduce the side setbacks from 15 feet to 7.5 feet (to structure and pool/enclosure), for reduction to the minimum lot width requirements from 100 feet to 70 feet (lots 1 &2) and 80 feet (lots 3 & 4) and for reductions of lot area from 20.000 square feet to a minimum 11.100 square feet, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C. On April 17, 2003, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions or denying the application and a copy of this Development Order will be mailed to you. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be April 17, 2003. The City encourages you to participate in the review process of this application. You may phone me at 727- 562-4604 x.2667 for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting (April 17, 2003). An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely, ~ J 0 Schodtler Development Review Specialist S:\Planning Departmenf\C D B\Standard FleNending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DR066th Street West 3311 Velventos West\66th st 3311 NotificationLette r.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIRBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . .~~~ ~~~~~ g~~(~~:.:~ "r:: - ~~ ...~- ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT March 24, 2003 George G. Pappas & Anthony Ciccotti Jr. 29703 69th Street North Clearwater, FL 33761 RE: Applications for Plat approval (PLT2003-00002) to create four new residential lots and Flexible Standard approval (FLS2003-03013) to reduce the side setbacks from 15 feet to 7.5 feet (to structure and pool/enclosure) and for reduction to the minimum lot width requirements from 100 feet to 70 feet (lots 1 &2) and 80 feet (lots 3 & 4) under the provisions of Section 2-203.C. Dear Mr. Pappas/Ciccotti: The Planning staff has reviewed your applications to create four new residential lots and to reduce their side setbacks from 15 feet to 7.5 feet (to structure and pool/enclosure) and for reduction to their minimum lot width requirements from 100 feet to 70 feet (lots 1 &2) and 80 feet (lots 3 & 4) under the provisions of Section 2-203.C. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The applications have been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case numbers: PLT2003-00002 and FLS2003-03012. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on April 17, 2003 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. Additional comments will be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562- 4604. Sincerely yours, J~~ Development Review Specialist S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\66th Street West 3311 Velventos West\66TH ST 3311 complete letter. doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BIl.LjONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . """1,, ."~\.~LOF TNt. '" \{~ l)tftt.'r.#,.,..,..,.~.~r-... ~~".jj _~'P :~::$l, \ I "ml7r;\ ~ ~ ~~"~-_"C=C..- .. ..' 'c::::c~ r: ~c.c~c;c;' -- ...'-4............. ..... .5:)__ ....... ~ _"'W' .. ~~ _~~..m-:.::::.=-. j'~,\ ~ '1:r:F-....~ ".,..... ... - .!'YJ. #-#1.." ~V."'T ..'" ~TE\\",.." "" CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT March 24, 2003 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 3311 66th STREET (PL T2003-00002 AND FLS2003-03013) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 3311 66th Street, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development has been filed for that property. The request is to create four new residential lots and Flexible Standard approval (FLS2003-03013) to reduce the side setbacks from 15 feet to 7.5 feet (to structure and pool/enclosure) and for reduction to the minimum lot width requirements from 100 feet to 70 feet (lots 1 &2) and 80 feet (lots 3 & 4) under the provisions of Section 2- 203.C. On April 17, 2003, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions or denying the application and a copy of this Development Order will be mailed to you. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be April 17 , 2003. The City encourages you to participate in the review process of this application. You may phone me at 727- 562-4604 x.2667 for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area. who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting (April 17, 2003). An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely, JO~I-- Development Review Specialist S:\Planning Departmen^C D B..standard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DR0.66th Street West 3311 Velventos WesM6th st 3311 N otijicationLe tte r. doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoY!' HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COM\IlSSI0NER * BU.LJONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" .. .. t.. n) j l, :,. in I REVISED MAY 0 5 2003 Velventos Subdivision Drainage Narrative Narrative Both the drainage calculations and plans show a pre- developed and post developed drainage node diagram. Off-Site Basin "A" consists of an existing subdivision located West of this site. Treatment and attenuation for the subdivision is provided via a swale along Velventos Drive and an existing weir which discharges to the existing surface water pond on our site. Treatment is provided with an underdrain system located near the existing weir. Existing Wetland Area consist of 1.591 Acres which discharge to off-site Basin "A" thru a 10" pipe.This 10" pipe connects the existing wetland to the existing swale system in off-site Basin "A". ' Basin "SW". the existing surface water pond area, consists of the pond~s drainage area, ingress-egress & ROW area. This area includes a 'large portion of our site under the pre-developed condition. The existing discharge from this surface water pond is via a 15" RCP pipe which runs from the existing pond to a discharge swale located South of the intersection of velventos Drive and 66th Street N. Under proposed conditions the top of bank of the surface water pond is raised to elevation 79.0'. Basin #1 consists of our site and our on-site retention system under proposed conditions. The discharge from the proposed on-site ,pond is via a drop structure and 15" RCP pipe which discharges to the re-configured surface water pond. Basin # 10 is a swale which discharges into the Countryside area drainage system to the East and South of our site. y- JtJ~t)J , . 1 , Summary of results - 25 year 24 Hour storm Existing Pre-Developed Post Developed Proposed TOB Flow Peak stage Flow Peak stage TOB (cfs) (ft) (cfs) (ft) Basin A 78.0' 4.67 78.24 4.59 78.33 78.45 Wetland 78.0' 1.20 78.00 0.88 77.98 78.0 Basin 1 2.99 78.90 79.2 SW 77.5' 4.69 77.60 4.58 78.32 79.0 Post development conditions widen weir on Basin A from 2.0' wide to 26" wide. This allows the basin A system to simulate the Pre- developed peak elevation. The Post- development flow to the discharge ditch is 4.58 cfs verses the Pre-development flow of 4.69 cfs. The Post development peak stage is elev. 78.32' verses the Pre- development peak stage of 77.60. (new TOB = 79.0') The T.O.B. developed) the top of overflowed was raised on the surface water body from 77.5' ( pre- to 79.0' (post-developed) to keep peak stage within banks. The pre-developed surface water body peak stage the banks and necessary freeboard. Basin A retention area reduced in proposed condition to account for 2-10' wide drives across retention area. 6" Free board in pond #1 A & Sw in 10 year 24 Hr. storm see cal c . ' s Adjust T.O.B. of swale in Basin A such that minimum T.O.B. elevation = 78.45' ~ , J. ;"";)r -T) (,,.., / ./.! '( 'e ,{/(W Ql' U j;r-Q C /V,j r. \1(: fl. t/ /.r;;i C, ('"oj ,f').' I '-- '-.l \...... ." . ( ,J ",-",' k __ (---r(, w~I-I"'hd (I. 1'1 A<) /1~j/1 ~\ W)~;( \ [I (/ C;(.f!Sit~ I '\ . \ d r ~OW~ $ VJ,:~ .~___, L{.L \ )Jrt:. Lk'.I' <.,l..;. It ..w....t~/-:"__ \ j.SJ I v A c: /'-'-'-"-- ( ~ '\' I 10 il'lj~ "",.,.- y // t~~~ / 1"\ !,' CI'" P " I"-S..., Z..~~/"~ ()C . "W '-........M 1 '; i 1; \ ) ~ j" i , " "\. I \::)1 ~I.~ \ \ '; \ ,'t'~ \ I . j \ "" ol-f.sl( ga:S~tl '1/<< Zt)!? /} c E'-,</.5t. ~e;t/~ A ~!: I. l!fa ~ c t:~'$I'1'\j SfA.t'~()( rJltltr _~<; I i.\.G A'€.tl. 0-' Z-i..(L( 4,- \ , < .... /"-------.....) / / 13ct5,!\ I t /')fJl'4,,(.. ~ \ \ ])'-.;:>.p '>Jh" \ I - ---Lo,,~~ ",,,,/ , / _f' -,..,^ 7 --..-'" ~ ,"_(1" ~-;.,~ ..' ~ --- -- 7---------. w,Je-,,~i i" ) /~a~,~r; '" We-I) ( ~ ( sv./ j;r;' I',"; ( b{'ls~\ (2.0(..) (I"il SvV . --_.~J~-- ~ BaSin \ \!'kdY o,gJ+^'l . .s:..~~ A ! "-" ? lJrllfJ.AS-/r. \ 2. 5'/3/1. ~ / 7::" ------. "/ -- ~ . '- /5'''1<'(1 ..._-~ i~~ \ ( , .1 ~ I?;~ "I '.~!I ~Il..\ J ~\ ')'~ 1\: 1 \J" i "<)1 \: , 1 '" ,~ r~ I . '--) I ' ',,- I\i' V-l s\"l J~- I I ' r c. I L>,t::3-Ve..- D pl'C l,(/OCCie 'f i .-.:.-~t:..t' '::1" C >.. .!.I-?;-' A,~ . . . afF$it..&S/-rl f1 :: z.,.,')13 /t c.. . we.-flo---c,\ ~~ r: t.y'-? Ac:. iF'!. ,sf/nJ S vrf-u.-c wJ~.. .?~?" v ..4 c P6-of'H-d .s~ ... !" 3-v"" A c 5" Z ~/t...r A c. ...---- Off-Site Basin A Existing Conditions Area = 2.513 Acres Existing Impervious Area: Pav't curb = 6,212 sf Sidewalk 1,800 sf Treatment swale = 7,260 sf Driveways = 6,300 sf Pads = 17,500 sf ------- 39,072 sf = 0.897 ac Existing C: .897 ac x 1.0 = .897 +1.616 ac x 0.2 = .323 2.513 ac 1.220 Existing C = 1.220 = 0.486 2.513 Existing Cn: .897 ac x 98 + 1.616 ac x 73 = 87.906 117.968 (D-soil, Grass & weeds) 2.513 ac 205.874 Existing Cn = 205.874 = 81.92 2.513 Existing Retention Swale El. (ft) Area(ac) Volume (ac- ft) tc = 15 minutes (min) 76.2 77.0 78.0 78.4 .078 .120 .162 .225 o .079 .220 " Off-site Basin A Proposed Conditions Proposed C = existing C = Proposed CN = Existing Cn = Proposed tc = Existing tc 0.486 81. 92 15 minutes Retention Swale Data El. (FT) Area (ac) Volume (ac-ft) total - 2 drives 76.2 .078 - .006 = .072 0 77 .120 - .012 = .108 .072 78 .162 - .018 = .144 .198 78.4 .225 - .021 = .204 Weir Length = 26" Weir Elev. = 77.26' , Volume at weir elev. 77.26' = .105 ac-ft - 0 ac-ft = .105 ac-ft DLW = SHWT = 76.2 Weir discharge to surface water body "" Orfice Bleed Down - Basin A Volume contained in Basin "A" swale = Volume contained in wetland = 0.105 ac-ft 0.769 ac-ft Total Volume .874 ac-ft 1/2 volume 0.874 = .437 ac-ft 2 Orifice Bleed Down = 1/2 volume in 60 hours H = H + H = 1.06 + .53 =.80' Q = .437 ac-ft x 43.560 =.0881 cfs 1 2 2 60 x 3,600 2 A = 0 = .0881 .5 .5 .6(2gh) .6(2x32.2x.8) = .0205 .5 .5 D = 4A ) = 4(.0205) = .162' = 1. 94# ~ , 3.1416 3.1416 @ El. 76.20 Existing Wetland - Wet 1 Existing conditions Area = 1.140 acres CN = 85 (D-soil Herbaceous) tc = 15 minutes (min.) Proposed Conditions Area = 0.497 acres CN = 85 (D-soil Herbaceous) tc = 15 minutes (min.) Wetland Data Elev. (ft) Area (ac) Volume (ac-ft) 75 76 77 78 0.182 0.340 0.497 0.62 o .261 .680 1.239 Wetland control by 10" pipe @ inv. 75.77 upstream 76.05 down stream 10" pipe flows to off-site basin A retention swale. SHWT = 76.5' , , Surface water (SW) (ROW'S, surface water, on site upland) Existing Conditions Area: off-site ROW = on-site area = surface water = 0.567 ac 0.580 ac 0.444 ac Total Basin #1 = 1.591 ac Impervious: ROW = 0.491 ac Surface water = 0.444 ac on-site area = 0.000 ac -------- Total Impervious = 0.935 ac Existing C = 0.935 ac x 1.0 = 0.935 + .656 ac x 0.2 = 0.131 1. 591 ac 1. 066 Existing C = 1.066 = 0.67 1. 591 Existing Cn = .935 ac x 98 = 91.630 + .656 ac x 73 = 47.888 ------ ------ 1. 591 ac 139.518 Existing Cn 139.518 87.7 1.591 Existing tc = 15 minutes (min) Existing Surface Water Data Elev. (ft) Area ( ac) Volume (ac-ft) 67 .015 0 68 .107 .061 69 .142 .185 70 .182 .347 71 .208 .542 72 .236 .764 73 .266 1.016 74 .298 1. 298 75 .332 1.613 76 .368 1. 964 77 .424 2.360 77.5 .549 2.847 SHWT 76.2 Ft Discharge is a 15" RCP - 72' in length Inv. 75.7~ up stream Inv. 75.P8 Down stream Discharge to drainage swa1e . Surface Water - SW Proposed Surface Water Data Total Area: off-site ROW = 0.567 ac surface water 0.367 ac~ Total Area = 0.934 ac Impervious: ROW = Surface water 0.491 ac r 0.367 ac"'" Total Impervious 0.858 ac Proposed C = 0.858 ac x 1.0 0.858 + 0.076 ac x 0.2 = 0.015 0.934 ac 0.873 Proposed C = .873 = 0.94 .954 Proposed Cn = .838 ac x 98 84.084 + .076 ac x 73 = 5.548 ------ ------ .934 ac 89.632 Proposed Cn = ~...J;;~ 96 0.934 Proposed tc 15 minutes (min) Proposed Surface Water Data Elev. (ft) Area (ac) Volume (ac-ft) 68 .104 0 69 .118 .111 70 .132 .236 71 .148 .376 72 .164 .532 73 .181 .704 74 .198 .893 75 .216 1.100 76 .235 1.326 77 .267 1. 582 78 .319 1. 879 79 .367 2.223 SHWT = 76.0 Ft = DLW .... Top of bank to SHWT = Historic Storage Proposed Historic storage = 79.0' - 76.0' = 2.223 ac-ft - 1.377 ac-ft = 0.846 ac-ft Existing Historic Storage ac-ft = 0.804 ac-ft 77.5' - 76.0' = 2.847 ac-ft - 2.043 15" RCP Inv. upstream = 75.76' Inv. Down Stream = 75.78' Discharge to drainage swale Install drop structure to control flow Set weir @ El. 76.2 = SHWT 1" treatment for Basin Sw = 1/12" x3.447ac = .288 ac-ft - 0.105 ~c-ff L.es.s r ffrr.1 m~(I-f F'r6 v I d e-tf itL BaSin ~ '::. 0./83 Ac-tr Set weir @ SHWT + treatment = 1.377 ac-ft + .183 ac-ft = 1.560 ac-ft El. = 76.70 , , Orifice Bleed Down = 1/2 volume in 60 hours H = H + H = .5 + .25 =.38' Q = .092 ac-ft x 43.560 =.0186 cfs 1 2 2 60 x 3,600 2 A 0 = .0186 .5 .5 .6(2gh) .6(2x32.2x.38) = .0063 .5 .! D = 4A ) = [4(.0063)j= .09' = 1.08" 0 3.1416 . 3.1416 @ El. 76.20' -... r------ '- , - Basin #1 (ROW'S surface water, on-site upland) Proposed Conditions Area: 1.30 ac Impervious: Pond = 0.223 ac Pads = 0.230 ac Drives = 0.083 ac -------- Total Impervious = 0.536 ac Proposed C = 0.536 ac x 1.0 + 0.764 ac x 0.2 1. 300 ac = 0.536 0.153 0.689 Proposed C = .689 0.53 1.30 Proposed Cn .536 ac x 98 52.528 + .764 ac x 73 55.772 ------ ------ 1. 30 ac 108.300 Proposed en = 1. 08. 3 = 83.3 1.3 Proposed tc == 15 minutes (min) '. , . Basin #1 Pond Data Elev. (ft) Volume (ac-ft) Area (ac) 73 74 75 76 77 78 79.2 .036 .046 .056 .092 .129 .165 .201 .0 .041 .092 .166 .277 .424 .607 SHWT = El 77.26' Ft First 1" Volume = ~ x 1.32 ac = 0.11 ac-ft 12 "" Set weir at SHWT + 1" Volume = .315 ac-ft + .110 ac-ft = 0.424 ac-ft = El. 78.01' 70' -15" Rep Inv. upstream = 72.5' Inv. Down Stream = 72.0' Discharge to Basin SW ,. Orifice Design for Pond #1 ~ Volume in 60 Hrs. 2 ~ Volume = El 78.01'-77.26'= .425 ac-ft - .315 ac-ft =.11 ac-ft 222 H H + H = 0.75 +.38 = 0.57' 122 2 .... Q = .11 ac-ft x 41.560 = .022 cfs 60 x 3,600 A = ~ = .022 .022 = .0061 .5 .5 .6(2GH) .6(2x32^.2x.57) 3.635 D = (4A 3.1416 .5 ) .5 = (4 x 0061) 3.1416 = .008' =1. of;/' @ orifice @ El. 77.26 I ,. Assumed Area Assumed eN Assumed tc Basin 10 Drainage Swale 50 acres = 85 = 700 min Time o 16 24 Stage 75.0' 77.0' 75.0' ,- E x/3 r//V'C? e 0/1 cO -f 1;11-5 ,. Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM PRE-DEVELOPED HODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class: Node--------------------------------------------------___________ Name: 10 Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 75 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 77 Comment: Time(hrs) Stage(ft) o 75 16 77 24 75 --------Class: Node--------------------------------------------_________________ Name: PREA Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 76.2 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 78.4 Comment: Stage(ft) Area(ac) 76.2 0.078 77 0.12 78 0.162 78.4 0.225 --------Class: Node----------------------------------------_____________________ Name: PRESW Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 76.2 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 77.5 Comment: Stager ft) Area( ae) 76.2 0.379 77 0.424 77.2 0.444 77.5 0.549 --------Class: Node-------------------------------______________________________ Name: WET Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 76.5 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 78 Comment: Stager ft ) 76.5 77 78 Area(ae) 0.419 0.497 0.62 ,. Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routir.g (ICPR Ver 2.20) [2] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM PRE-DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------C1ass: Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin: 10 Node: 10 Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Amount( in): 9 Area(ac): 50 Curve #: 85 OCIA(%): 0 Peak Factor: 256 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Concentration Time(min): 700 Time Shift(hrs): 0 -~------Class: Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin: PREA Node: PRE A Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Amount( in): 9 Area(ac): 2.513 Curve #: 81. 92 DCIA(%): 0 Peak Factor: 256 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Concentration Time( min): 15 Time Shift(hrs): 0 --------C1ass: Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin: PRESW Node: PRESW Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Amount( in): 9 Area( ac): 1. 591 Curve #: 87.7 DCIA(%): 0 Peak Factor: 256 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Concentration Time(min): 15 Time Shift(hrs): 0 --------C1ass: Basin---------------------------------------------_______________ Basin: WET Node: WET Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Amount( in): 9 Area(ac): 1.14 Curve #: 85 DCIA(%): 0 Peak Factor: 256 Storm Dur ation( hrs): 24 Concentration Time(min): 15 Time Shift(hrs): 0 ,. Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [3] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM PRE-DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------class: Pipe------------------------------------------------------_______ Name: R-SW Group: BASE UPSTREAM Geometry: Circular Span(i n): 15 Rise( in): 15 Invert(ft): 75.76 Manning's N: 0.013 Top Clip(in): 0 Bottom Clip(in): 0 From Node: PRESW To Node: 10 DOWNSTREAM Circular 15 15 75.78 0.013 o o Length( ft): 72 Count: 1 Equation: Av Frc SIp Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.5 Exit Loss Coef: 0.5 Bend Loss Coef: 0.5 Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use dc or tw Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Groove end projecting 3 Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Groove end projecting 3 --------Class: Pipe-------------------------------------------__________________ Name: R-WET Group: BASE UPSTREAM Geometry: Circular Span{in): 10 Rise{in): 10 I nver t( ft ): 75.77 Manning's N: 0.013 Top Clip(in): 0 Bottom Clip(in): 0 From Node: WET To Node: PREA DOWNSTREAM Circular 10 10 76.05 0.013 o o Length(ft): 10 Count: 1 Equation: Av Frc SIp Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.5 Exit Loss Coef: 0.5 Bend Loss Coef: 0.5 Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn or tw Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Groove end projecting 3 Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Groove end projecting 3 ,. Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) (4] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM PRE-DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Input Report ********************~*********************************** --------Class: Weir-------------------------------------------__________________ Name: R-A From Node: PREA Gr oup: BASE To Node: PRESW Count: 1 Type: Mavis Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Spa n(i n ): 24 Rise(in): 9 Invert(ft): 77.26 Control Elev(ft): 77.26 TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0 Top Clip(in): 0 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.23 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.5 --------Class: Simulation----------------------------------_____________________ C:\ICPR2\297AVE\297AVE\297AVE Execution: Both Header: 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORH PRE-DEVELOPED MODEL ---------HYDRAULICS-----------------------------HYDROLOGY-------------------- Max Delta Z (ft): 0 Delta Z Factor: 0.01 Time Step Optimizer: 0 Drop Structure Optimizer: 0 Sim Start Time( hrs): 0 Sim End Time(hrs): 30 Hin Calc Time(sec): 3 Ma x Ca 1 c T i met sec ): 5 To Hour: PInc(min): 11 15 16 5 24 15 ---------GROUP SELECTIONS-----------------------_____________________________ t BASE (04/21103] Override Defaults: Yes Storm Dur(hrs): 24 Rain Amount(in): 9 Rainfall File: FLHOD To Hour: 36 PInc(min): 5 ,. Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM PRE-DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Basin Summary - 297AVE ********************************************** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** Basin Name: PREA WET PRESW 10 Group Name: BASE BASE BASE BASE Node Name: PREA WET PRESW 10 Hydrograph Type: UH UH UH UH Unit Hydrograph: UH256 UH256 UH256 UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 256.00 256.00 256.00 Spec Time Inc (min): 2.00 2.00 2.00 93.31 Comp Time lnc (min): 2.00 2.00 2.00 15.00 Rainfall File: FLMOD FLMOD FLMOD FLMOD Rainfall Amount (in): 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 Storm Duration (hr): 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 Status: ONSITE ONSITE ONSITE ONS ITE Time of Conc. (min): 15.00 15.00 15.00 700.00 Lag Time (hr): 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area (acres): 2.51 1.14 1.59 50.00 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Curve Number: 81. 92 85.00 87.70 85.00 DC I A (%): 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Time Max (hrs): 12.10 12.10 12.10 21.00 Flow Max (efs): 10.00 4.73 6.82 15.12 Runoff Volume (in): 6.80 7.18 7.51 7.18 Runoff Volume (cf): 62047 29708 43366 1303017 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM PRE-DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Link Maximum Conditions - 297AVE ************************************************************** (Time units - hours) Link Group Max Time Max Flow Max Delta Q Max Time Max US Stage Max Time Max DS Stage Name Name Flow (cfs) (cfs) U/S Stage (ft ) D/S Stage (ft) ------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- R-A BASE 12.41 4.67 0.02 12.41 78.24 13.15 77 .60 R-SW BASE 13.45 4.69 1.12 13.15 77 .60 16.00 77 .00 R-WET BASE 14.37 1.20 0.40 13.28 78.00 12.41 78.24 \ ? rtJ pt/.5 ed Co /1 cI / TI" 11 S r Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM -POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------C1ass: Node------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 1 Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 77.26 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 79 COlllment: Stage(ft) Area(ac) 77 .26 0.138 78 0.165 79 0.201 --------C1ass: Node------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 10 Base Flow( cfs): 0 Init Stage( ft): 75 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 77 Comment: Time( hrs) Stage( ft) o 75 16 77 24 75 --------C1ass: Node------------------------------------------------------------- Name: A Base F1ow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 76.2 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 78.4 Comment: Stage(ft) Area(ac) 76 0.072 77 0.108 78 0 .144 78.4 0.204 --------C1ass: Node------------------------------------------------------------- Name: SW Base F1ow(cfs): 0 rnit Stage(ft): 76.2 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 79 COAlment: Stage(ft) Area(ac) 76.2 0.241 77 0.267 78 0.3197 79 0.367 --------C1ass: Node------------------------------------------------------------- Name: WET Base F1ow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 76.5 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 78 Comllent: Stage(ft) 76.5 77 78 Area( ac) 0.419 0.497 0.62 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [21 Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM -POST DEVELOPED HODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class: Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basi n: 1 Node: 1 Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLHOD Rainfall Alount(in): 9 Area(ac): 1.3 Curve t: 83.3 DCIA( %): 0 Peak Fac~or: 256 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Concentration Ti~e(min): 15 Time Shift(hrs): 0 --------Class: Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin: 10 Node: 10 Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLHOD Rainfall Amount(in): 9 Area( ac): 50 Curve j: 85 DCIA(%): 0 Peak Factor: 256 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Concentration Time(min): 700 Time Shift(hrs): 0 --------Class: Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin: A Node: A Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLHOD Rainfall Amount(in): 9 Area(ac): 2.513 Curve t: 81. 92 DCIA(%): 0 Peak Factor: 256 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Concentration Time(min): 15 Time Shift(hrs): 0 --------Class: Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin: SW Node: SW Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLHOD Rainfall Amount(in): 9 Area(ac): 0.934 Curve j: 96 DCIA( %): 0 Peak Factor: 256 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Concentration Time(min): 15 Time Shift(hrs): 0 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [3] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM -POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class: Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin: WET Node: WET Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Amount( in): 9 Area(ac): 0.497 Curve #: 85 DCIA(%): 0 Peak Factor: 256 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Concentration Time(min): 15 Time Shift(hrs): 0 --------Class: Pipe------------------------------------------------------------- Nallle: R-WET Group: BASE UPSTREAM Geometry: Circular Span(i n): 10 Rise( in): 10 Invert(ft): 75.77 Manning's N: 0.013 Top Clip(in): 0 Bottom Clip(in): 0 From Node: WET To Node: A DOWNSTREAM Circular 10 10 76.05 0.013 o o Length(ft): 10 Count: 1 Equation: Av Frc Slp Flow: Both Entrance loss Coef: 0.5 Exit loss Coef: 0.5 Bend loss Coef: 0.5 Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use dc or tw Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge wI headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge wI headwall Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [4] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORH -POST DEVELOPED HODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class: Weir------------------------------------------------------------- Name: R-A Fr 011I Node: A Group: BASE To Node: SW Count: 1 Type: Havis Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Spa n(i n ): 28 Rise( in): 9 Invert( ft): 77 .26 Control Elev(ft): 77.26 TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0 Top Clip(in): 0 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.33 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.5 --------Class: Drop Structure---------------------------------------____________ Nallle: R-1 From Node: 1 Length(ft): 70 Group: BASE To Node: SW Count: 1 Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn or tw Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn Upstream Geometry: Circular Downstream Geometry: Circular UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Span(in): 15 15 Rise(in): 15 15 Invert( ft): 72.5 72 Manning's N: 0.013 0.013 Top Clip(in): 0 0 Bottom Clip(i n): 0 0 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.5 Exit Loss Coef: 0.5 Flow: Both Equation: Aver Frict Slope Upstrealll FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge wi headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge wi headwall ; Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [5] Copyright 1995, Strea.line Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM -POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** *** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure R-l *** [TABLE] Count: 1 Bottolll Clip( in): 0 Type: Havis Top Clip(in): 0 Flow: Both Weir Discharge Coef: 3.33 Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.5 Span(in): 15 Rise(in): 12 Invert(ft): 78.01 Control Elev(ft): 78.01 --------Class: Drop Structure--------------------------------------------------- Name: R-SW From Node: SW Length(ft): 72 Group: BASE To Node: 10 Count: 1 Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn or tw Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn Upstream Geometry: Circular Downstream Geo.etry: Circular UPSTREAH DOWNSTREAM Span( in): 15 15 Rise(in): 15 15 I nvert(ft): 75.76 75.78 Manning's N: 0.013 0.013 Top Clip( in): 0 0 Bottom Clip(in): 0 0 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.5 Exit Loss Coef: 0.5 Flow: Both Equation: Aver Frict Slope Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge wi headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge wi headwall *** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure R-SW *** (TABLE] Count: 1 Bottom Clip(in): 0 Type: Havis Top Clip( in): 0 Flow: Both Weir Discharge Coef: 3.33 Geoletry: Rectangular Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.5 Spa n(i n ) : 12 Rise( in): 16 Invert( ft): 76.7 Control Elev(ft): 76.7 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [6] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM -POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class: Simulation------------------------------------------------------- C:\ICPR2\297AV\297AV\297AV Execution: Both Header: 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM-POST DEVELOPED MODEL ---------HYDRAULICS-----------------------------HYDROLOGY-------------------- Max Delta Z (ft): 0 Delta Z Factor: 0.01 Time Step Optimizer: 0 Drop Structure Optimizer: 0 Sim Start Time(hrs): 0 Sim End Time(hrs): 30 Min Calc Time(sec): 3 Max Calc Time(sec): 5 To Hour: Plnc(min): 11 15 16 5 24 15 ---------GROUP SELECTIONS---------------------------------------------------- t BASE [04/28/03] Override Defaults: Yes Storm Dur(hrs): 24 Rain Amount(in): 9 Rainfall File: FLMOD To Hour: 36 Plnc(min): 5 . Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM-POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Basin Summary - 297AV *********************************************** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- u* Basin Name: A WET 1 10 SW Group Name: BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE Node Name: A WET 1 10 SW Hydrograph Type: UH UH UH UH UH Unit Hydrograph: UH256 UH256 UH256 UH256 UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 256.00 256.00 256.00 256.00 Spec Time Inc (min): 2.00 2.00 2.00 93.31 2.00 Comp Time Inc (min): 2.00 2.00 2.00 15.00 2.00 Rainfall File: FlMOD FlMOD FlMOD FlMOD FlMOD Rainfall Amount (in): 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 Storm Duration (hr): 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 Status: ONSITE ONSITE ONSITE ONS ITE ONSITE Time of Cone. (min): 15.00 15.00 15.00 700.00 15.00 lag Time (hr): 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area (acres): 2.51 0.50 1.30 50.00 0.93 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Curve Number: 81. 92 85.00 83.30 85.00 96.00 DCIA (t): 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Time Max (hrs): 12.10 12.10 12.10 21. 00 12.07 Flow Max (cfs): 10.00 2.06 5.28 15.12 4.27 Runoff Volume (in): 6.80 7.18 6.97 7.18 8.52 Runoff Volume (cf): 62047 12952 32896 1303017 28872 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 25 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM-POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** link Maximum Conditions - 297AV *************************************************************** (Time units - hours) Li nk Group Max Time Max Flow Max Delta Q Max Tillle Max US Stage Max Time Max DS Stage Name Name Flow (cfs) (cfs) U/S Stage (ft ) D/S stage (ft) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- R-1 BASE 12.37 2.99 0.01 12.58 78.90 12.92 78.32 R-A BASE 12.13 4.59 -0.59 12.85 78.33 12.92 78.32 R-5W BASE 12.92 4.58 1.20 12.92 78.32 16.00 77 .00 R-WET BASE 15.45 0.88 0.40 14.07 77 .98 12.85 78.33 ,- Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20.) [1J Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 10 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM -POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class: Node-----------------------------------------------------------__ Name: 1 Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 77.26 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 79 COBllllent: Stage(ft) Area(ac) 77.26 0.138 78 0.165 79 0.201 --------Class: Node-------------------------------------------------------______ Name: 10 Base Flow( cfs): 0 Init Stage( ft): 75 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 77 COlllle nt: Time(hrs) Stage(ft) o 75 16 77 24 75 --------Class: Node----------------------------------------------------_________ Name: A Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 76.2 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 78.4 CORlllent: Stager ft) Area( ac) 76 0.072 77 0.108 78 0.144 78.4 0.204 --------Class: Node------------------------------------------------------_______ Name: SW Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 76.2 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 79 Comment: Stage(ft) Area(ac) 76.2 0.241 77 0.267 78 0.3197 79 0.367 --------Class: Node--------------------------------------------------------_____ Name: WET Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 76.5 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 78 Comment: Stage( ft) 76.5 77 7R Area( ac) 0.419 0.497 1\ f..? Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) (2) Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 10 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM -POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class: Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basi n: 1 Node: 1 Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Allount( in): 7.5 Area(ac): 1.3 Curve #: 83.3 DCIA(%): 0 Peak Factor: 256 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Concentration Time(min): 15 Time Shift(hrs): 0 --------Class: Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin: 10 Node: 10 Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Amount(in): 7.5 Area(ac): 50 Curve #: 85 DCIA(%): 0 Peak Factor: 256 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Concentration Time(min): 700 Time Shift(hrs): 0 --------Class: Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin: A Node: A Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLHOD Rainfall AlBount(in): 7.5 Area(ac): 2.513 Curve .: 81. 92 DCIA(%): 0 Peak Factor: 256 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Concentration Time(min): 15 Time Shift(hrs): 0 --------Class: Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin: SW Node: SW Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLHOD Rainfall Amount(in): 7.5 Area(ac): 0.934 Curve #: 96 DCIA(%): 0 Peak Factor: 256 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Concentration Time(min): 15 Time Shift(hrs): 0 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [3] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 10 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM -POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class: Basin-------------------------------------_______________________ Basin: WET Node: WET Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: UH256 Rainfall File: FLMOD Rainfall Amount(in): 7.5 Area(ac): 0.497 Curve #: 85 DCIA(%): 0 Peak Factor: 256 Storm Duration(hrs): 24 Concentration Tillle(lIlin): 15 Time Shift(hrs): 0 --------Class: Pipe------------------------------------------___________________ Name: R-WET Group: BASE UPSTREAM Geometry: Circular Span(i n): 10 Rise(in): 10 Invert(ft): 75.77 Manning's N: 0.013 Top Clip( in): 0 BottOAl CUp(in): 0 Froll Node: WET To Node: A DOWNSTREAM Circular 10 10 76.05 0.013 o o Length( ft): 10 Count: 1 Equation: Av Frc SIp Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.5 Exit Loss Coef: 0.5 Bend Loss Coef: 0.5 Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use dc or tw Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge wi headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge wi headwall ,. Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) (4] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 10 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM -POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class: Weir------------------------------------------------------------_ Name: R-A From Node: A Group: BASE To Node: SW Count: 1 Type: Mavis Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Spa n(i n ): 28 Rise{in): 9 Invert( ft): 77.26 Control Elev(ft): 77.26 TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0 Top Clip(in): 0 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.33 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.5 --------Class: Drop Structure---------------------------------------------______ Name: R-1 From Node: 1 Length(ft): 70 Group: BASE To Node: SW Count: 1 Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn or tw Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn Upstream Geometry: Circular Downstream Geometry: Circular UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Span(i n): 15 15 Rise(i n): 15 15 Invert( ft): 72.5 72 Hanning's N: 0.013 0.013 Top Clip(in): 0 0 Bottom Clip{in): 0 0 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.5 Exit Loss Coef: 0.5 Flow: Both Equation: Aver Frict Slope Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge wi headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge wi headwall Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [5] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 10 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM -POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** *** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure R-1 *** [TABLE] Cou nt: 1 Bottom Clip( in): 0 Type: Mavis Top Clip(in): 0 Flow: Both Weir Discharge Coef: 3.33 Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.5 Span( in): 15 Rise(in): 12 Invert(ft): 78.01 Control Elev(ft): 78.01 --------Class: Drop Structure--------------------------------------------------- Name: R-SW From Node: SW Length( ft): 72 Group: BASE To Node: 10 Count: 1 Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn or tw Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn Upstream Geometry: Circular Downstream Geometry: Circular UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Span( in): 15 15 Rise(in): 15 15 Invert(ft): 75.76 75.78 Hanning's N: 0.013 0.013 Top Clip(in): 0 0 Bottom CUp(in): 0 0 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.5 Exit Loss Coef: 0.5 Flow: Both Equation: Aver Frict Slope Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge wI headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge wI headwall *** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure R-SW *** Count: 1 Bottom Clip(in): 0 Type: Mavis Top CUp(in): 0 Flow: Both Weir Discharge Coef: 3.33 Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.5 [TABLE] Span(i n): 12 Rise(in): 16 Invert(ft): 76.7 Control Elev(ft): 76.7 ~ Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [6J Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 10 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM -POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class: Simulation--------------------------------------------___________ C:\ICPR2\297AV\297AV\297AV Execution: Both Header: 10 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM-POST DEVELOPED MODEL ---------HYDRAULICS-----------------------------HYDROLOGY-------------------- Hax Delta Z (ft): 0 Delta Z Factor: 0.01 Time Step Optimizer: 0 Drop Structure Optimizer: 0 Sim Start Time(hrs): 0 Sim End Time(hrs): 30 Hin Calc Time(sec): 3 Max Calc Time(sec): 5 To Hour: Plnc(min): 11 15 16 5 24 15 ---------GROUP SELECTIONS-------------------------------------_______________ t BASE [04/28/031 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Dur(hrs): 24 Rain Amount(in): 7.5 Rainfall File: FLMOD To Hour: 36 Plnc(min): 5 # '. Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 10 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM-POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Basin Summary - 297AV *********************************************** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- u* Basin Name: A WET 1 10 SW Group Name: BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE Node Name: A WET 1 10 SW Hydrograph Type: UH UH UH UH UH Unit Hydrograph: UH256 UH256 UH256 UH256 UH256 Peaking Factor: 256.00 256.00 256.00 256.00 256.00 Spec Time lnc (min): 2.00 2.00 2.00 93.31 2.00 Comp Time lnc (min): 2.00 2.00 2.00 15.00 2.00 Rainfall File: FLMOD FLMOD FLMOD FLMOD FLHOD Rainfall Amount (in): 7 .50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 Storm Duration (hr): 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 Status: ONSITE ONSITE ONSITE ONSITE ONSITE Time of Cone. (min): 15.00 15.00 15.00 700.00 15.00 Lag Time (hr): 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area (acres): 2.51 0.50 1.30 50.00 0.93 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Curve Number: 81.92 85.00 83.30 85.00 96.00 DCIA (%): 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Time Max (hrs): 12.10 12.10 12.10 21.00 12.07 Flow Hax (cfs): 7.97 1.66 4.23 12.07 3.54 Runoff Volume (in): 5.38 5.73 5.53 5.73 7.02 Runoff Volume (cf): 49036 10337 26114 1039989 23800 ; .... Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.20) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc. 10 YEAR 24 HOUR STORM-POST DEVELOPED MODEL ********** Link Maximum Conditions - 297AV *************************************************************** (Time units - hours) Link Group Max Time Max Flow Max Delta Q Max Time Max US Stage Max Time Max OS Stage Name Name Flow (cfs) (cfs) UIS Stage ( ft) DIS Stage (ft ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- R-l BASE 12.55 2.37 0.01 12.57 78.70 12.89 77 .93 R-A BASE 12.24 3.52 0.02 12.85 77 .95 12.89 77 .93 R-SW BASE 12.92 3.81 0.86 12.89 77 .93 16.00 77 .00 R-WET BASE 15.28 0.55 0.40 13.99 77.72 12.85 77.95 <f) " N ..... "' V'" ...""- -. '~--. ,- - --\ ~~" '. ......CL<"lT~ ~_'-'I.."':<.. .:. ""'.~' .. ANCLOTE KEY is. ,~.;.:~/.. ; ~TATE .DRESERVE~"_-'~_r.'n..jW .l.' . :, / \- ~- " '.':0. I,. \~ ".:S \~ e,I r ---L- I ..::.. <f) OJ N Q c:: ,':,l.l? ~ ~ :::',;:-:::' ':':':::: ::.:;.::...-:',< I ---r- ~ ":::";.' '-..:.::.".:. <.. ....;... ..:..':.:.....:: :.:,:.:.:'::;.:,. ....:... , ""', ,":., -:;"':.. '.::':::."''- :"::":. ;...:.... <f) en N 0- ......-.,.... .,' ",.." .>Z......:::.:....:.::....:: 1) I 1 ..."--. 71 -.: <1" /t? .../ < -< I ----,- .:.-....:.:'::-:.:..::.:.:::.::: .;....-.. ";,.;: '.::;: .:.:....:.:::: :',.:.; . . ~.:/.....::.:..:: ':'::';;':;':0:-- .::..:.... ....,. W ":':"::: ::;".:.:: .,:.., ~ I NO I AN I-- _'] ~~ MSWf! If-O Lf 0 3 I I 'fI- -11~' .... n jl;il lira j "i"q !~~ ~ ;:l '" ;;, Iii . ~ .~. I ~ J;:>' I I~I fil'l ~ ';: ~ d ~ 'M'O'O' "\.. "'-. :.~.'!, .,~ ~. y .:'/:~ J.:' ~'i ... '. H ~. J I ~ &. 0._ t~~.. 3Ml .1OMIILiS .o~ ~ . ...@ ,~. I ...@ t,- I . :. ':". .;...~ f ":.:.: r-<:. ~..&it- a' ".Ji:I.... --t 4, ~ t.J 0. ~ ~ --i CI ~ I z In :x: !'ij .DOl1l~ ~ " ~~ >! ~ I i ~ . .. II; 0\ I " ! ... M ;:,. In .~ --i In ~ n ;:,. !J r ~ ~ -: UI ~ II ... .~ . ~ '. * " r'''' , I I !JAf' 8- I I 0.; ~ .... . f"- l...... a ~ o .~ 'I 0'1 -.. .~ 0~ ... ~ "---- "\.. ~ ~ .~ ~'- CQUNTY, FLORIDA SHEET NUMBER 5 IP , r;..,~"",,,f,', i .. rtrt) ':i;-" "i '~. '."'.',~'I (', '.,~ '!~i' '''' .f. ~ it!\\l\ "1"" ,.~i"~'\')""'i~,I! I ""', 'i"'" :.~'~i 1J'f.:.t\" iii.' ) ,.. )':"", !l>- t -:- .~" .1 ~l ( I I I ~6. I I · ,-, l:"y-:1 ~ ~~ ..~ J ! if/"(~ /I : \/I~~ I 1/_:','."'_.,1 /' ( """.w .,' \.._- . >, 9. " 8e/, , ". (;;;>~) \\ 'ii", c._.-, ~\ '..., i~ \ Ch, '\1, " 4 , ----I ----- ~.j!UI!L~~j d~:U2 727S392~G5 r',,! I C/.I'''Lc.[,t,I<EF: FAX NO. 727 527 6084 Ft;GE 0: P. ! . -- . MA~- 5-03 WED 5:58 PM ANDREYEV ENGINEERING ..~ Andreyev Engineering, Inc. Sf. IfIS1'R$aI,1HrJ OFFJCe 314 0 .54", AV.llli.. Nurth St. P.hilrlburg, Florida 3'31/.. 'IZ'I"$27'6~ "-If: '1~7.52'NJ(JIJ_ ... Groundwatvr Y Environm0ntal .,. G90technical ... Construction Materiels Testl'lg March 5, 2003 Project No.: APOT-03-020 TO: Mr. Michael Baker 220 Soulh Safford AVQnu9 Tarpon Springs, FL 34689 SUBJECT: GeotecMnlcal Investlgatlot'l, Residential Development. ()6th$treet North and Velvento6; Orive. Clearwater, Florida -----.-....-.. Dear Mr. 8akltt: In accordance with your request and authorization or our proposal, Andreyev Englne(Jring. If'lc. has completed tho geotechnical InvestIgatIon related to the design of the retention pond area for the aboVQ referenced project. This letter report summarizes the n~sults of our field and labor..tory work. and presents our geotechnical engineering evaluatlona Bnd general design recommendations rQt~ted to the design of the propcs~d retention pond. froiJct D8.crIDtl2n Based on the plans provided fer our review, we understand that the proposed project consists of the design and construction of a slormwatar retentIon pond associated with a resktentlal development. Our study herain raddressed geotechnical design recommendations for the proposed project. Proltct ARPI2Kh Tho obJecti~e 0' our geotechnical Investlga110n for the proposed project was to obtain Information concerning the 5ubsurfaee conditions within the proposed r8tl;mtfon pond area, In order 10 maktl geotechnical engineering conclusIons In each of the followIng are3s; 1. Soli stra.t1graphyst the boring locations and the development of ths approximate soil profile within the boring loc;ation. 2, General location t/lnd descriptIon of pohmtially delelerlous m~terlels which may interfere with construction progress, Including buried or surficial e.xl:sting fills, organics, construction dobris, etc. 3. IdeliliOca(lon or some critics I design or co",tructlon dGtails, Jncluding present groundwater levels and sea~onal fluctuations in the proposed retention areca. 4. Dolermlnation of the perm8abllity rates fer the Shallow soils located in Ihe proposed retenlion pond area. -- Thv"..e$ ~-"4:;-H22 FJI,If ~74:J,'(J23 Clil'rttont ;M.z.~I~ Fex :J5I.24 1-()'''., SlInford 407-J3t>-1763 Fa)( <f()7-~~,.,4:S Q;UJ8 3~-41)1.f1511 ;:61f ~1'~Q"95(!1 ~5,IU(IL~~_j j4;U~ 72-71J3825SG MAK- ~-03 WED 5:5B PM ANDREYEV ENGINEERING I.': .L CHAl ~E{il.EY FACiE 0:' FAX NO. 727 527 6084 . -'~""""'--~--.........- P 2 Stage otW.o.rk In order to llddre83 the above objoCltJves, OUf ~COp9 Qfwork ror L~ls project included lhs fOllowing: 1. Rev1ewed 8\1sllBble published Information on the site, i"cludlng the United 5t8195 Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soli Conservation Servtce (SCS) soil survey data for Pinellas County and the United Stales GeologIcal Survey (USGS) topographic map.. 2. Conducted 8 sub,urface exploratlon progrum consisting ot ,. single auger borlnQ in the prQPoSltd retention pond area to evaluate the 5hallow soils find groundwalcf condItions In thIs area. The borIng was conducted to lit depth of 10 fe8t below land sunaee (bl.). 3. Performed a constant l'Jead permeability test In order to delerl'nlne lhe hydraulic conductivity of th. shallow loll>> at the borIng location. 4, Reviewed and visually elasslrled _the reeovered $ol/s In the laboratory Using thtil Unified Soll$ CIS6SlrlcetfOrt SY4item. DelveloP41d the general soli stratigraphy at tho boring location. 5. Prepared B geotechnical engIneering report whlth summarizes the course of our study, 1he field and laboratory data generated, the subsurface conditlons encountered, SInd our geoteChnIcal englneerlhg Av~llJafions for t". eoM.ttUclion of tha proposed retent/of") pond area. EJ(lstlng Site COndition. The sit" consists of grasl)' open area" The aite grade slopes to a large pond to thtl aouthwQst of the site lllnd to a wetland area to the elst of the site west. ihe IlIe is bordered to the south by Villvento9 Drive end 10 the we_, by 66" Street. The USGS topograPhic survey was reviewed for the site. The alta ia found on the Quadt8ngl. map entitled .Oldsmar, FIe:, From thIs review, the natural ground lIiurface elevation for the $ite is approximately +75 ("et NatIonal Geodetic Vertlca' Datum ot 1929, .SWaurf.(;~ SoU CondltloJJl Be$ed upon a rfi"'ew of th. .Soil Survey of Plnelles County Arva, Florida", published by the USDA SCS. Myakks and Placid .olls 8te the domin~nt soil type$ for this !Ite. These Sooillype$ genQrally conslata of nearly level, poorly dralnad sandy 501ls. The seasonal high watSr table w1thfnlhegg soils wfll generally vary from the surface to 1 fOOf below the ground surface. v~/~rf~~r~-~ ~~.~~ (~i~~5L8bb MAi- 5-03 WE) 5:59 PM ANDREYEV ENGINEERING r"'l',_:r 1(;I,-_,bi:,ILI< r,'.,Ut:.. !JLj . . FAX NO. 727 527 6D84 P. 3 . II .... Ellie) eXtt!orat)on Prcgrllm A single aUger boring (PB-1 ) W8s conducted to a depth of 10 reet bls within the l'rQPos$d rehmtion pond 8flit8. Th~ boring W8$ approxImately locatBd In the field accordIng to tt'1e site phen provided by the project elvll engIneer. The approximate boring locatioh Is shown on Figure 1, The recovered soli samplst were vi~ually classified In the fleld, and representatlve samples were placed In Jars llf:ld transported to our otfke for further review and confirmation of the field classification G'lneraJlzed' SO~Jgr~~ ThE! rOillults of the subsurfaeo explortltlon program Ineluding the :lOil :,tr;ellf1el!lllol"l profiles end ::!>ome per1immt e~plorat;on information such as groul'ldwater levels 18 Included on FlgurfJ 2. Soli SUliltlflcatlon was based on the ttiwlew of recovered soli umplu and intorpretatlon of the field boring logs by a geotec:l1nlcal englneErr 'The stTatll1cation' lines represent the approxImate boundaries butween soil type,: the actual transition may be gradual. Th& soil strata were visually classified U.fhg the UnWed Soils Classif1catlon System. Minor variations In ioll types not consldered Important 10 OUr engineering evaluatlons may have been abbreviated or omitted for darity. Boring PB-1 encovntored sflghtly silty flnQ sands (Stratum 1) to a depth of 4,5 feet followed by mucky One ,and (Stratum 2) which continued to a depth of 7 feet The borIng terminated in sllQhtly silty flhlil .and (Stratum 3) at a depth 0' 10 feet. The shallow groundwater Win encountered at ~ dep1h of 4.5 feet in boring PB--1. The shallow uroundwa.er level should be expectilid to vary during wet seasons. heavy rainfall f.Jvents and lid'll activity. au~d on review or the SCS soli survey, boring results, measured groundwater levels, adjacent surface waler features and antecedent rainfall, the normal iieasor'lal high groundwater table within the proposed retention pond Is ex.pected to occ;ur at a depth of about 3.0 feet below the exl$li1"lg ground surface" f.!1:rnvabllitv IntJ('1Q As pert of our Inve,Ugallon, we condUcted an open borehole Con$tan! head permeability test in a shallow piezometer install"d in auger boring PB-l. The piezometer was installed by first drilling a hole to the desIred depth using an 8ugerwith a 3-lnch diameter, The piezometer was conslruct,d of 2./nch diu. SCH 40 PVC pipe and ,010.lnch slotted screen. The piezometer WAS surcharged for a period of 5 minutes prior to te..Un~ to s~t~ratQ lhe 6urroundlng 801ls. Then con.tant hoad teals were conducted which consisted or measuring the flow of Waler Into the te~t hole in order to maintaln a Constant water level. This procedure was repeated ~everal time5 to ensure consistent result$. The results were then cBlculatGd and M average permeability value was derIved using the formula given below (DesIgnation E-19. Eanl1 Manual, 1974): K := In(h!r}Q/~ hllhlT" .. X(hIT .JJ) HydraUlic conductjlfjly K r'~.!~7!0IlnJ 04:82 7'~~q:~,:"~'~~,~ MA~:'~~UrW~Li b:Ul.' fM '-fl.rll)i~Yi'~ fN{;INH~jN(j ['...1 I I~H,i'.E'._E 0\1 TR FAX NO. 72'; 527 6084 F':':":E U'~ P. 1 . . .. ~ I, ",.." r w h ,.. T\j Q Q = Djam~ter of test hOIG HeIght of oon$tent water levell1lbovQ the bottom of test hole Difference between shallow groundwater level and constant waler leval Flow ioto tElst hole Based on the re~ults of our permeability te$Ung, the horizontal permeability value at lhe location of boring PB-1 was determined and Is provided with additional soil parameters Ih the following lable: Paramel.r. pa.., Effective Depth 10 Ballam of Aqulfor Depth 0' ~$onal High Grol.lnd-..valer Depth ot S"'lIon~llQV\l Gf'QundWaler EstJmtited Un.lhJraled V"rtlclll Hydreulic Conductivity AverlJge Horir.ontal Hydraulic Condtlctivily EGtlmallJd Porosity Stota 4it CA.lefficien! 10 fUl 3 r.., 5.5 feCIt 2 faeVday 3(..lIdIlY .~ ~~J The normal s,easom~1 high groundwater le\'9l, withIn the proposed retention pond area,ls estim~18d to Q<;cur at 3.0 feet bls. We estimate the rl0/TnQJ dl)' season groundwater level to occUr at 5.5 feat bis. To slmull.ltlillhe tleld conditlol'! 8S closely as possible, the average aquifer parametor" shown 0,., tne table lIbtlVl!l, estimated from the field and laboratory program I should be used to design tho retention pond. Closln~ Andreyev Englnee,Ing he$ appreciated this opportunity to provide you with our engineering conslJltlng services 01'1 this project. If We may be of further service 10 you, or If you have any ~ue$t1ons regarding the Information conlained herein, please do not he$itale to give us a call. Attiichmenls: Figures 1 and 2 . p::I;'n7!~?pn:~ ?4.rl~ 7~)7~.~~2~~~ ~tAR~' S~OrW~~ -6':00 PM -AKDRE\'E1I ENGlliEERING ". f'" 1 C:Hi:',ELeN<ER FAX NO, 727 527 6084 h'.:,GE D.: p, b . ':r'..... TABLE MA:3ig7~~C$lu J~;8f rM . . . 72 7':13::1'2r: ::1 E. ANUK~Ytv ~NGjNt~KING 1,,1 I 1~,I-I,.:,r:L_E.r'"' EF: ~AX hU, ~~~ ~L/ bUd4 ,. "',J\'" '" ~'-- ~. .........111.... .,.. --- I II \ OFF..$ITE ~71ANO ;Z1 p ~ -- F~CE t', IJ ~,: t ~ ~ I.€CEND . AUGOi 8QRINC lOCA 110N ~ Andreyev Engineering, Inc. Cr:o'lT.~Nle,..L. ,,..VEllTlO,4 TlON PROPOSED RESIDEN TIAL. OEVEl.OPMENT CUARWA TER. flORJOA BORING lOCATION flGU~E' 1 . ~:3!B7/2C03 84:02 72793825~E, ~6~- ~-03 WED 6:GI PM ANDREYEV ENGINEERING I''': I C:Hi~E:_E Af"EP FAX NO, 'in?lf but4 Ft:.GE o:~ ( ! .... II.... .' PB-1 0 w CD W l&... Z 5 ~ ~ CD 0.. W 0 a 10 LECENO m CD 8ROWN SUGHTlY SILlY fINE SAND (SP-S~) II] CD BlACK MUCI<Y nNE SAND (SP-PT) IT] 0 DAAK BROWN SLlCHTl Y SILTY FlNE SAND (SF>-SM) (SP) UNlnEO SOIL ClJ',5SlflCATION CROUP SYMBOL - 4~ O~P'TH TO CROUNOWATER, fEaRUARY, 200J ~ And ---:1 etOlteHNiC,\l. IN'vESnOAll0lol reye~ PROPOSED . Englneenng, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Inc. CL1'~w...n:,R. nORIO,", ~ OAlt: O~;';J/03 DI(;jNl:~:J[ BORINC LOCA liON NIAl"OT-aJ-IIZO P"AWN IIY:".S nCVRE 2 ~--- 1 .. ~.S/2-"'f()3 . Case: PL T2003-00002 & FLS2003-030 13 - 3311 66th Street Owner/Applicant: George E. Pappas/George G. Pappas and Anthony Ciccotti (727-409-6469/E-mail pappaipa@verizon.net). Location: 1.88-acres located at the northeast comer of Vel vent os Drive and 66th Street. ~ Atlas Page: 178A. ~'\ Zoning: LDR, Low Density Residential District. ~_ ..!J Request: Preliminary Plat approval to create four new residential lots (PLT2003-00002) and Flexible p~ Standard approval (FLS2003-03013) to reduce the side setbacks from 15 feet to 7.5 feet (to 61. ~ structure and pool/enclosure), for reduction to the minimum lot width requirements from 100 feet C/ to 70 feet (lots 1 &2) and 80 feet (lots 3 & 4) and for reductions of lot area from 20,000 square feet to a minimum 11,100 square feet, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C. Present Use: Vacant. Proposed Use: Four residential lots as part of a plat and the construction of four new single-family residences with enclosed swimming pools. Presenter: John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist. The following are comments made by the Development Review Committee. We are sending them to give you notice of changes to comments and concerns relating to your application. The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: 1. Environmental: a) No comments 2. Fire: a) Provide a Fire Hydrant on 66th Street. Address prior to the issuance of a Development Order. 3. General eneineerine: a) A four foot, concrete sidewalk required along right-of-way per City Standards. If sidewalk is installed against curb, then a 5 ft. concrete sidewalk is required. b) City water main details not needed on Sheet 8 of 9. Water service will be provided by Pinellas County. c) Address the above prior to the issuance of a Development Order. d) Need a detail of a doghouse manhole prior to issuance of a building permit. e) Sanitary sewer assessment? To be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Harbor Master: a) No comments. 5. Land resource: a) Reconfigure retention pond to preserve trees with an above average rating on the tree inventory provided by the City prior to D.O. b) A "Tree Preservation Plan" will be required prior to Building Permit. This plan must show root pruning and tree barricade and tree canopy lines. Additional space will be required at the top of bank at the 26" Live Oak at the SE comer of the pond. I will assist with the design of the Preservation Plan, please call for an appointment. 6. Landscapine: a) No comments. 7. Parks and Recreation: a) That a $200 Recreation Facility impact fee per unit be paid prior to the issuance of any permits for each unit. 8. Plannine: a) Need survey(s) of surrounding submitted properties to justify side setback reductions requested. Was previously, not sure how 7.5 foot side setbacks are consistent with character of neighborhood. b) Need site plan showing setbacks to structures, pools and driveway from property line and jurisdictional wetland setback. 9. Solid waste: a) No comments ... . . 10. Stormwater: a) Narrative is still unclear and lacks some important design information (example - removal of underdrain, etc.) Please expand narrative to describe the existing conditions, hydrology and hydraulics as well as the proposed construction and methodology for design. b) Demonstrate that the proposed pond volume (at DHW) contains the volume of existing storage plus the volume required for attenuation as calculated using City of Clearwater Storm water Criteria. The existing pond is shown with a TOB at 77.2 and a modeled DHW of 77.77 - the volume of the .57 feet of overflow is a historic storage volume and should be maintained. Also the model is probably assuming a "glass wall" up the sides of the pond creating the additional .57 feet of head acting on the discharge pipe and possibly increasing the pre-developed discharge rate. Please adjust the node stage/area to reduce this effect. c) Calculations still do not address the attenuation volume per the City of Clearwater Design Criteria, please contact if you need a copy of the design criteria. Total volume must include the historic storage as well as the City Volume Criteria. d) Pre-developed on-site directs a large portion of flow to the wetland, adjust the model to incorporate this flow into the wetland. (MET) e) Calculations mention treatment in retention swale via existing underdrain. The underdrain could not be found in the survey. Where does the underdrain discharge to? Please add a note that the functionality of the underdrain will be verified and restored if needed. f) Please add a detail including the modifications to the swale headwall. Also ICPR uses a 28" weir, plans specify 26" - please correct. g) Are proposed buildings to be 2500 sf (.230 ac / 4 units) each? Understanding that each lot may build differently. Please describe how the total impervious will not be greater than the design. (MET) h) Please supplement the ICPR model with a basin-node-link schematic - this does not have to be to scale, however should show how each is connected and give the same labeling as the model. This will aide in review. i) Please submit a schematic that contains all ICPR input information, include all Basins, Nodes and Links showing how each is connected. This will aide in review and for future clarity. j) The Basin 10 seems quite large. The time of concentration of 1000 minutes brings the peak of the runoff well after the peak of the storm. Please either provide justification for assumptions or assume more conservative numbers that bring the peak of the runoff more in-line with the storm peak. k) We will need further justification for the assumptions used for Basin 10. A Time of Concentration of 700 minutes still seems rather large and is bringing the hydro graph peak in at hour 21 vs. 12 or 13 where it more likely is. As a modeling alternative, perhaps you may omit the Basin 10 flowing to the swale (downstream of the final outfall) and only rely on the staging in the swale to create the tail water conditions. 1) Show sodding on the side slopes of the ponds. (MET) m) Show littoral shelf in pond and on cross-section. n) Show littoral shelf area in each pond. Littoral shelf must be below the control water elevation and equal to at least 35% of the area at the control water level elevation. 0) Control structure grate elevation is below DHW. (MET) p) Ponds require 6" freeboard for 25-year, I-hour storm; per City of Clearwater Design Criteria. q) Show slope of ponds at 4:1 to at least 2' below SHW. (MET) r) ICPR Node 10 uses a Time/Stage relationship. Without additional justification, this needs to rise and fall along with the ponds. Since these elevations will control your head at the weir, this must be as accurate as possible - begin no less than the bottom of swale just below the connection (say 75.5) and rising to within 6" of top (say 77) throughout hours 12 and 13 before receding. Otherwise other documentation is required. s) The rise in the modeled weirs is not accurately depicted. At the swale headwall 12" is modeled; however after rising 6", to the top of the headwall, a new weir cross-section is required. Same at the drop structures, the rise at the wier must extend above the DHW of the node if using a simple slot weir, otherwise the model will act as a window weir. t) Two similar, but different Summary of results were submitted. Please correct on resubmittal. . . 11. Traffic ene.ineerine.: a) Provide a four-foot wide sidewalk along property's frontage pnor to the Issuance of a Development Order. NOTES: 1. Send comments to George E. Pappas at pappajpa@verizon.net. DRAFT CONDITIONS: 1. That a $200 Recreation Facility impact fee per unit be paid prior to the issuance of any permits for each unit; 2. That all required assessments be paid prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for each unit; 3. Provide all required Engineering details prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That solid waste service be arranged with the City by the applicant prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for each home; and 5. That evidence of a SWFWMD Permit or exemption be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any permits. 6. A "Tree Preservation Plan" will be required prior to Building Permit. This plan must show root pruning and tree barricade and tree canopy lines. Additional space will be required at the top of bank at the 26" Live Oak at the SE corner of the pond. I will assist with the design of the Preservation Plan, please call for an appointment. 7. Traffic impact fees of $7,108.00 to be paid prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy per ordinance. ~. i r r-- I ~IL G.J. Hol,ann Professional Engineer 8620 Airway Blvd. I New Port Richey, FL 34654 . Phone: (727) 844-7686 Fax: (727) 844-7626 April 24, 2003 REV\SEO Mr. Don Melone City Of Clearwater Public works Administration 100 S. Myrtle Ave. # 220 P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 . .. ""113 V\~1 U J 'JIJ .__,i '.)1 Re: Velventos West Subdivision " .........-._'.v - Dear Mr. Melone: Enclosed for your review are the following: 1. 8 sets of revised site construction plans 2. 4 sets of revised storm water calculations with exhibits In answer to your request for following changes, additions, etc. the plans and calc. IS. additional,information th~ have been incorporated into 1. Environmental a. R~vised plans to show 25' buffer 2. Fire a. Added hydrant along Velventos, as a hydrant exists on 66th Street 3. General Engineering a. No Right-Of-Way exists, only ingress/egress easement b. Water details now shown Pinellas County standards c. Understood d. Detail of Doghouse manhole now shown on plans e. Understood 4. Harbor Master a. N/A 5. Land Resource a. Pond relocated to save best trees 6. Landscaping a.N/A 7. Parks and Recreation a. Understood .. '. . . \ 8. Planning I a. understO!- ~D SL-r:e:. ftA.~ ~1 ~ 9. Solid Waste ~8JA~.....G> sr{2..M.a-u.~ a. Understood Z ~ ~6Y at: :5tA.~j~ ~6:S - -rb ~..,\~(' SL06 ~ ~... 10. Stormwater a. Narrative added to calc.ls b. Historic storage comparison shown in calc.'p c. Existing basin areas revised d. Underdrain now shown and note added e. The maximum building foot prints is presently anticipated to be 2500 sf.. Should foot prints exceed 2500 sf. revised calc.'s would be in order. f. Pre and Post node diagrams are shown in calc.ls and on plans. g. Basin #10 has been reduced h. Sodding now shown i. Littoral shelf shown on plans and cross sections j. Top of bank raised k. ~" free board is available on 10 year 24 hour storm 1. side slopes revised m. understood n. The SWFWMD Permit will be submitted when received 11. Traffic Engineering a. sight triangles now shown b. Note added to plans c. N/A d. N/A e. Understood No Pinellas County Health Department Permit is required due to the change in the Florida building Code which requires the plumber to install the water facilities. Should you have questions please contact me. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, I'll. I . (I I jl.;I.__ ~V'-~. / r"L- ",,-' Galen J./~ofma~n, PE I I -' . . 4Jr1j03 10:45 - 11:15 a.m. Case: FLS2003-030 13/PL T2003-00002 - 3311 66th Street Owner/Applicant: George E. Pappas/George G. Pappas and Anthony Ciccotti (727-409-6469/E- mail: pappaspa@verizon.net Location: 1.88-acres located at the northeast corner of Velventos Drive and 66th Street. Atlas Page: 178A. Zoning: LDR, Low Density Residential District. Request: Preliminary Plat approval to create four new residential lots and Flexible Standard approval to reduce the side setbacks from 15 feet to 7.5 feet (to structure and pool/enclosure), reduce the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 70 feet (lots 1 & 2) and 80 feet (lots 3 & 4) and reduce the lot area from 20,000 square feet to a minimum 11,100 square feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C. Present Use: Vacant. Proposed Use: Four residential lots as part of a plat and the construction of four new single- family residences with enclosed swimming pools. Neighborhood Association(s): None. Presenter: John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Mike Reynolds, Glen Bahnick, John Schodtler, Bryan Berry, Frank Gerlock, Joe Colbert, Rick Albee, Scott Rice and Tom Glenn Applicant/Representative: George E. Pappas, Anthony Ciccotti and George Pappas The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: 1. Environmental: a) The vegetative buffer shown on the east side of Lot 4 must be increased to 25 feet from wetlands, pursuant to Section 3-907. Address prior to the issuance of a Development Order. 2. Fire: a) Provide a Fire Hydrant on 66th Street. Address prior to the issuance of a Development Order. 3. General eneineerine: a) A four foot, concrete sidewalk required along right-of-way per City Standards. If sidewalk is installed against curb, then a 5 ft. concrete sidewalk is required. b) City water main details not needed on Sheet 8 of 9. Water service will be provided by Pinellas County. c) Address the above prior to the issuance of a Development Order. d) Need a detail of a doghouse manhole prior to issuance of a building permit. e) Clarify with Staff whether or not there will be a sanitary sewer assessment. If there is it will be required to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Harbor Master: a) No comments. 5. Land resource: a) Reconfigure retention pond to preserve trees with an above average rating on the tree inventory provided by the City prior to Development Order. 6. Landscaping: a) No comments. 7. Parks and Recreation: a) That a $200 Recreation Facility impact fee per unit be paid prior to the issuance of any permits for each unit. 8. Planning: a) Clarify how 7.5 foot side setbacks are characteristic of neighborhood; and b) Due to existing site constraints (pond, jurisdictional wetlands, trees) two or three dwelling units might be more appropriate for development of this site. 9. Solid waste: a) That solid waste service be arranged with the City by the applicant prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for each home. DRC action agenda - 4/17/03 - Page 8 10. Stormwater: . . a) The submitte lculations are unclear and hard to follow. PI . clarify project and utilize a narrative describing the drainage methodology and design. b) Demonstrate that the proposed pond volume (at DHW) contains the volume of existing storage plus the volume required for attenuation as calculated using City of Clearwater Stormwater Criteria. The existing pond is shown with a TOB at 77.2 and a modeled DHW of 77.77 - the volume of the .57 feet of overflow is a historic storage volume and should be maintained. Also the model is probably assuming a "glass wall" up the sides of the pond creating the additional .57 feet of head acting on the discharge pipe and possibly increasing the pre-developed discharge rate. Please adjust the node stage/area to reduce this effect. c) Pre-developed on-site directs a large portion of flow to the wetland, adjust the model to incorporate this flow into the wetland. d) Calculations mention treatment in retention swale via existing underdrain. This could not be found in the survey. To where does the underdrain discharge? Please add note that the functionality of the underdrain will be verified and restored if needed. e) Are proposed buildings to be 2500 sf (.230 ac / 4 units) each? Understanding that each lot may build differently. Please describe how the total impervious will not be greater than the design. t) Please supplement the ICPR model with a basin-node-link schematic - this does not have to be to scale, however should show how each is connected and give the same labeling as the model. This will aide in review. g) The Basin 10 seems quite large. The time of concentration of 1000 minutes brings the peak of the runoff well after the peak of the storm. Please either provide justification for assumptions or assume more conservative numbers that bring the peak of the runoff more in-line with the storm peak. h) Show sodding on the side slopes of the ponds i) Show littoral shelf in pond and on cross-section. j) Control structure grate elevation is below DHW. k) Ponds require 6" freeboard. 1) Show slope of ponds at 4: 1 to at least 2' below SHW. m) Address all of the above prior to the issuance of a Development Order. n) Prior to building permit, evidence of SWFWMD Permit or exemption is required. Traffic eneineerine: a) Show 20 foot x 20 foot Sight Distance Triangles from the property line at all driveways per (City of Clearwater's Land Development Code Book). b) Objects within the Sight Distance Triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the ground/pavement. c) Clarify whether a four-foot wide sidewalk along property's frontage will be provided or payment in lieu of installation to be paid to the City. d) Address all of the above prior to the issuance of a Development Order. 11. NOTES: 1. 2. Send comments to George E. Pappas at pappajpa@verizon.net. Due to existing site constraints (pond, jurisdictional wetlands, trees) two or three dwelling units might be more appropriate for development of this site. In response to the above comment (#2), the applicant will provide evidence that 7.5-foot side setbacks are consistent with the character of the area. 3. DRC action agenda - 4/17/03 - Page 9 DRAFT CONDITIONS: . . 1. That a $200 Recreati acility impact fee per unit be paid prior to the 1 ance of any permits for each unit; 2. That all required assessments be paid prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for each unit; 3. Provide all required Engineering details prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That solid waste service be arranged with the City by the applicant prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for each home; and 5. That evidence of a SWFWMD Permit or exemption be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any permits. DRC action agenda - 4/17/03 - Page 10 r-(o ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~s ~ 0.J ~o{tk ~0 ~~(9~ FAX COVER MEMO LL ~y::r. / rwater o >- f- - u CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT . 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: {.J tJ/.J..Il>>..:J'7 CA t-LbJT I FAX: Z~<6 - ~c~ <; Phone: FROM:~ kV\. S-- DATE: t!~ Phone: SUBJECT:~~ S &J6S Y MESSAGE: t?&,lS~ Fi e 0 Ce>MMn-.,....}T ~ /. /6 Wnr$.rt- MAJ~ ~/2- H/2-E. J./YOIl4JNT:s ~ ~E> ~u tSL 51!. Q.,6AJ2.E;O I-J.IJ/A/ A 1?Jru,-r %t y~ tJ.IJ U ';h .sr II NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) O~~0 --1b ~~ ~ ~~ . FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARW A TER PLANNING DEPARTMENT . 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ..4tJ:['-lit:)7\JY Q Cl-O m FAX: 7 z- --z -- z-ct ~ ... ~<6't(~ Phone: FROM: .::Jo h.V'\ ~ DATE: U, 1 z....o Phone: SUBJECT: V6u.io~6 u..$T MESSAGE: FL-sz.oo~ - 030\3 _I= I r:2.E="- ldAS Z. ~W5:SI\D""c:.i /, ~1t2~ I-{YOr2~ l5 W wes-r S\D6 ~ lO"'-R>oT C()~~b ~l-L., ~s To ~ ~ :2'..AST CSlD(b ~ ~. 11-A...JS> 5l,bw ~l\ '{'J.t-I\ ON MOs\ P~3 ~ (~l\ c~ ~(S 6["H;~. vJtha4 1,3 1 T? NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) ~ ~ PJ.-AN,..)6 ~ON - ~,~ G-- 727- Sc.z - 43:2-7 X 3031 ~ 2. . . LL o >- I- u FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: A....n'H O~ Y Cl Co, 0 TT . -:flit. FAX: '7z7 ~ 2'~ -it~S Phone: 'S(,.d 45(.7 )( 2ltJ. 7 SUBJECT: fL."2()l>~ - 0000 t. f""L-S 2.co ~ -03 ~ L ~ MESSAGE: ~~ f'Ou...oW c..OMt.-\E-..~5. AQ.F-~ 1:tU\Pr ~ . - /J 0 "r;Et:...I 5' D~ W I U- Pl;; MADE: lli.ST I L- -1"J..I {; AC.TU,AL ~-rltJ~ ~,.~~. (AP1l."- 17, 2..ct.ii~ Phone: 40 '1 - '4-~ , FROM: ~h." S. DATE: .~W03 NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) ...3 . . LL o >- f-- u FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: AtJTl-I~,uV Ctcc..m,-) <!"R- FAX: 2.'l B - V~<i S Phone: FROM: .:r-~., s. DATE: () Phone: SUBJECT: V6U/6tJ1"'o W6ST MESSAGE:_I'I J.4AS 'Bf=F~ ~l~Fh ""-J..lA'- ,^~-,WIU- ALJ...iY.AJ ~H6 c.o~f\tTV Pr7I')PE.IZ.:tY~ AS GAAt-AcrE,rl.. -13uJ, ~'S. ~zi2-- ~~SI~NG>f wL1""H- ~AfJ.b 10 '3::rr3.JlLJ6;. \do~, ~ Wll,L- ~l+~ -rv '5E6 ~~cF f\Zl~l(;;S W~ f2.9)u~ ~lD& SeTSAuLS IN ~ -(0 13E:. Gall11t::D ~ ~uJ'" -r~ (~crU-JS:'"fiuOF SIa::J s~Aal5 ex: t\.)S hHMu-trxlb · NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) ;", . .( . f- J.35.S55 PlNELLAS COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT cobE '. (b) Building site area requirementi The mini- mum b~ding site area requirements in the R-4 district are as follows: (1) Area:. Seven thousand five hundred square feet, minimum.' (2).. WJdth:'Se~~ty-five feet (see section 138- 1279).' ' . 4' (3) Depth; Eighty feel.. , (4)' Platting of siDg1e-funuIy attached dwell- ings to allow individUal unit ownership is permitted provided ,the. duplexes. or tri- plexes suldect. to p1a~ :were initially approved ~ect to the prcivisions of R4 zoning. No sticbpIatiingshall be ap- proved. by<the 'zorUng'division until such be'as Ii fiiW 'site plan forthe'project has been renewoomid approved by the ZOD.- ingdmsion forc:onstrD.ct.iOn purposes. Pr0- ViSions for parking.andeasements for .:.aceess~ to. units~ ,parking' areas are required and are1:D be iecorded as parlof the plat, and must be shown on .the sub- mitted site\plan.' Easements, for mainte- JIaDCe.sball be required where necessary. 'I1le unit access easements are to be a mininiumof fOur feet in. width. It is the intent of this section to aHow individual dwelling unitfee'simp1e Ownership with- out creating a" DO~ .building area req~ent. . . Lots ofrecord,~lP<:h were platted on or before Febntary 5, 1963, shall permit one dwelling unit for ead1 full 2,500 square'feet.ofiot area s~ect to .density.reshictions as ~M in subsection (e) of this sectiop, (section 188-209 snallnot apply to tbk ~). No structure may amtain more than three dwelling units. . ' . , . (e). Maximum building area.. In the R-4 dis- trict" a minimum of 25 percent of the site must remain in'open permeable area. (d) Setback requirements (see also- section 138- l2S1~ in the R4 district, the following minimum ' setbacks shall be required: (1) Front: 'I'wenty-five feet, measured from any right-of-way line to a strW;ture~ Cor- ner lots ofrecoro as ofFebrnary ~ 1963, Suw. No, 19 which are I~ than '15 feet in width may provide a 15-foot,setback along the area considered the side street, which for pur- pose of this chap~ shan be the long side 0( the lot. . (2) Side: Seven andone-:half.feet. (3) Rear: Ten feet..,:, ~ ;.,~> (e), Special requirements. . 'l11e m,m11TQD1 den- sitY of the.R.-4 district'~bC' 000 unit for each full 2,500 square feet ofIOt area (nO Str-actiIre may contain more.than three .dwelling units) or the,. density~~ by the ~ensive'lan.d use ~,1dUcheverlS lesS:"' ':' .',' (Ord. NO". 9O-1r ~ 1(207.6),:1-30-90; Ord. NO. ~7, ~ 8, 8-29-00)' . Sees. 138-556-188-580. Reserved. ( D~ION 9. ~-6., ~ENTIA1. MOBILE'), , . HOME PARKS AND SUBDIVISIONS, .. D:rsrnICT -- See. 138-581. Definition;~ilDdnm;nt , or-~'~~~~c''-''::'':~'; , . .. -. '. . . " .) ~ , .-' The R-G, J;eSidentia!.' ~e'hoJne. parks. alia . subdivisions district ~ composed of single-fa.Ipily residential areas eomprisedof mobile homes. Uti- lization 'of rontempOiary deSign-pr8dice is encoUT.. aged and developers shall avoid 'the DlOll'Otony.of. _ obsolete rectilinear or herriugbone patterns. 'fhis' cfistrict shall include those areas indkated on tJ:te zoning. atlas maps as R-6.. . " . (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(208.1), 1-30-90) See. 138-582. Permitted uses. WIthin the R-6, resideatial,. mobile home parks and subdivisioDs district, only the foDawing uses shall be pennitted: (l)Mob~e homes in subdivisions. (2) Mobile. homes in m~ile home parks_ . (3} Customary a~ uses such as main- tenance areas~ laundry ~recreationa1 facilities,storage facilities far residents. No new mobile: home- park or subdivision. or addi- tions thereto: will be. permitted in any coastal high . CD138:50 . ZONING hazarc:l ~ 'hurricane eyacuation zone level A, or ll00dway designated pursuant to chapter 170, article~ (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(208.2), 1-30-90) See. 138-583. Special exceptions. . - Section 1~~0 contains '.' special exceptions 'which ~y be ~tted in the R-6 district, upon application to t1ie~board of a.djustment and favor- able action thereQti pursuant to article IT, division 7 of this chapter.':;', Any use considered '~onresidential approved un- der this. provision shall not exceed a floor area ratio of .40 nor an impervious surface ratio of .65. (Ord. No. 90-1. ~ ~(208.3),l-30-90; Ord. No. 95-28, ~ 6, 4-18-95) See. 188-584. Mobile home park develop. me~t standards. The followf6g provisions apply to mobile home parks: (1) Maximum building height. Thirty-five feet (alSo see ~ection 138-1277>. (2)" Minimum buiUfing site area requirements. ~ Area: Fifteen acres. b. Width: One hundred fifty. feet (see section 138-1279). - c. Depth: Two hun~ feet. . . d.. ..Lotrequirements: Each mobilehome.___ site or space shall-be at least .3,600 square feet in area an<J be at least 20 feet Wide where such lot abuts any public or private roadway or drive. Twenty-five percent of the spaces to be provided in a mobile home park may be a minimum of 3,000 square feet, provided that fo~ ~ such space one space shall be provided with at least 4,000 square feet. Lot area shall be exclusive of street or drive. See section 138-209 for lots or parcels of substandard diniensions. (3) Minimum and maximum building areas. 'lbtal structural coverage shall not exceed 40 percent of the site area. Supp. No. 19 CDl38:51 . , , .... "A" ... .. .... ~ 138-584 (4) Set?xzck TeI[Uireinents (see also section 138- 128l). The following minimum setbacks shall be requirOO: a. . OUter perimeter of park: 1. Front: Twenty-five fee~ mea- sured from any publicly dedi- cated right-of-way line to a structure. . 2. Side: Ten feet (when abutting periineter). . 3. ~ 'Thn feet (when abutting perimeter). b. Interior lots: 1; 'No part of ~y structure, ex- . . cept the" trailer hitch, shall be . closer than ten feet from the edge of any interior roadway. 2. -Side and rear yards shall be five feet from lot lines. (5) S""-:~, . ments.. ~ reqznre . a. Maximum. density. Maximum den- sity shall not exceed eight mobile. home -units per ,.gross' acre or the density permitted by the comprehen- sive land use plan, whichever is less. b. Stre!!t requirements. Roadways or streets within a mobile home park: may be private, but the followiI;J.g requirem~ts shall apply: 1. Internal collector streets shall .. be 30 feet in width, with a minimum of 24 feet of pav.ed surface. - 2. InterQ.al minor streets shall be 25 feet in width, with a mini- mum of 20 feet of paved sur- face. 3. A collector street shall be de- fined as a street designed to facilitate adequate traffic flow from two or more interna). mi- nor streets to dedicated rIghts- of-way. All streets which pro- vide ingress and egress from . dedicated public rights-of-way shall be deemed to be collector .. . ~ . f 13U84 PINELLAS COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE streets. All other streets within the. park may be internal minor streets. 4. Except. as otherwise p[.Ovided in this chapter, the design and construction of roads, streets, drives, utilities .snd drainage installations shall be in compli- ance With the minimum stan- dards of-the site developnient regulati;)os and- the countyutiI- iti~ system. The COWlty.admin- istratbr~require a state reg- istered '.engIneer ta provide a . statement of such compliance prior to the issuance of a certif- '. icate of occupancy. c. Recreation area requirements.. Not - less than ten percent of the gross - site area shall be devoted. to open . Space and recreation ~ties,.gen- erally provided in a central location, or in larger sites, decentralized. Such 8I'E:3S include space for community . buildings and community use.facili- - tieS; such as recreation and play :. areas, swimmine pools .and - open space. (Oed. No.. 90-1, ~ 1(208.6P), 1-30-90; Ord. No. 90-55, ~ 1~ 7-24-90) See. 138-585. Mobile home subdivision de- velopment standards. The follOwing provisions apply to mobile p~me . subdivisions: -(1) Maximum building height. Thirty-five feet (also see section'138-1277). (2) Minimum bui14ing site area require11;lents. , a. Area: Six thousand square feet. b. Width: Sixty feet (~ ~on 138- 1279). c. Depth: Eighty feet. Areas for new mobile home subdivisions shall consist of a minimum of ten acres. - See section 138-209 for lots or parcels of substandard dimensions. Supp. No_ 19 CDl38:52 (3) MClXimumareaoflandcoverage. Thenia,x- imum area Orland coverage by structures shall be 40 percent of the entire area of the lot or parcel..A:~um of25 percent of the lot or parcel muSt. rem8in in open permeable space. . (4) Setback requir:ements (~see section 138- 1281). The fonowing Jnjnim.um setbacks shall be required: a. . Front: Shall be a.minimum of25 feet. in depth measured -from a right-of- way line totl:refroilt of the structure; provided, however, that permitted structures on substandard lots in a mobile home subdivision of record prior to May 7, 1963, shall be set back a minimum of 15 feet in depth, . measured from the right-of-way line to the front of the structure. b. .Side: Six feet. c.~:~ Ten f~t. (5) SJ1eCUd.requirements. a. Maximum denSity. The ma:rlm.um- density of.a mobile ~ome subdivision.. . shall be one mobile home on a 6,000- square:- foot lot or the density per-' mitted by the comprehensive land . use ~ whichever is less. b. Subdiviswn. stalufards. A mobile home subdivision shall be platted in accordance with the standards or-this chapter and thapter 154 of this Code. (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(208.68), 1-30-90; Ord. No. 90-55, ~ I, 7-24-90) -~ j See. 138-586. Effective date. (a) Any real property zoned R-6 after Janual-y 30, 1990, shall comply with all of the provisIons set forth in ~bis division. Any legally established mobile. home park in existence o~ or prior to Janul)Iy 30, 1990, may ~I).tinue to operate in accordance with approved plans and in accor- dance with the regulations whichwerein effect at the time of the park's Eite plan approval.. Legally established mobile home parks in existence prior .. to February 5, 1963, may continue to operate ill e- accord~Ce with approved plans subject to com- pliance with the zoning regulations in effect on the date of such approval. .(b) Any additio~ expansions or substantial changeS to existing mobile home parks or subdi- visions shall comply with the provisions of the current requirements of this division. . (Ord. No. 9O-1~ ~ 1(208.6), 1-30-90) Sees. 188-587 ~'1S8-610. Reserved. DIVISION lb. RM, RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY DISTRICT See. 188-611. Definition, purPose and intent of district. The RM, residential;multiple-family district is - intended to provide a broad range of residential deyelopment'l.-types and intensitieS. This district shall include those areas indicated on the zoning - atlas maps as RM and R-5. Adoption of this chapter will not change these e1assification desig- nations. but will make this division applicable to them. (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(209.1), 1-30-90) See. 188-612. .Permitted uses. Within any RM. "residential, multiple-family district, only the following uses shall be permit- ted: (1) Single-f~y dwellings, attached or de- tached, and multifamily dwellings, and their cu.stoJ:nary accessory uses, including but not ~ted to: a Home occupations (see ~on 138-" 1335). b. A1:cessory dwelling unit (accessory only to single-family dweIDn.gs). (2) Storage areas for use by resid~ts only. Such areas shall be screened by opaque fencing or landscaping a minimum ofsix feet in height with such fencing to comply with all other applicable portions of this chapter. Supp. No" 19 CD 138:53 e .-~" .. ~'" t" . -' ZONING ~ 1~14 (3) " Group homes, category n, only under th following conditions: ~ a. The facilitysball not be located within " 1,200 f~t of another group home or congregate care facility. b. The facility shall.not be within 500 feet of the boundary of any property zoned for single-family homes or within any area utilized by single- family homes. c. The facility shall obtain" a license from the state. department of health " and rehabilitative services prior to commencing operation. d. The facility shall not be located in the coastal high hazard area, hurri- cane. evacuation zone level A. or floodway as designa~ by chapter 170, article ill of this Code. (~No. 90:-1, ~.1(209.2),1-30-90; Ord.No. 90-55, ~ 1,7-24-90; Ord. No. 99-66,"~ 18,7-20-99) " See. 138--613. Special exceptions. -' Upon application to the board. of adjustment and favorable action thereon, pursuant to article II, division 7 of this chapter, the folloyrlng uses may be permitted in the RM district: (1)- Day care center. (2) Group "homes, category I (in single-family areas). . (3) Group homeS, category ill (in multifamily areas only). (4) Congregate care facilities. Maximum num- her of beds shall be- three times the ~r- mitted density. (5) See section 138-240 for other special ex- ceptions which may be permitted ro- this district. (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(209.3), 1-30-90; Ord. No. 90-55, ~ 1,7-24-90; Ord. No. 00-67, ~ 11,8-29-00) See. 13U14. Conditional uses. " Upon application to and favorable action by the board of county commissioners, pursuant to arti- cle IT, division 8 of this chapter, nursing homes t~ . (1) Front: 'I\venty feet, measured from any right-of-way line to a structure. (2) Side: Seven feet. (3) Rear: 'len feet. (e) Special requirements. The density of the R-2 district shall not exceed one dwelling on each 7,500 square feet of land area or the density permitted by the comprehensive land use plan, whichever is less. (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(205.5),1-30-90; Ord. No. 94-36, ~ 1, 4-19-94; Ord. No. 00-67, ~ 6, 8-29-00) Sees. 138-491-138-520. Reserved. (DIVISION 7. R-3, SINGLE-FAMILY) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (6,000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM)* Sec. 138-521. Definition, purpose and intent of district. The R-3, single-family residential district is . comprised of single-family dwellings with maxi- mum density of land use by single-family resi- dences. This district will provide smaller lots and dwellings for those areas in the county where this type of development is practical. This district shall include those areas indicated on the zoning atlas maps as R-3. Adoption of this chapter will not change this classification designation, but will make this division applicable to them. (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(206.1), 1-30-90) Sec. 138-522. Permitted uses. Within any R-3, single-family residential dis- trict, only single-family residences and their cus- tomary accessory uses, including but not limited to the following, shall be permitted: (1) Accessory dwelling unit. (2) Home occupations (see section 138-1335). (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(206.2), 1-30-90; Ord. No. 99-66, ~ 11,7-20-99) *Editor's Dote-Ord. No. 02-60, ~ 1, adopted July 23, 2002, changed the title of div. 7 from "R-3, Single-Family Residential District" to "R-3, Single-Family Residential Dis- trict (6,000 Square Foot Minimum)". . ZONING ~ 138-525 See. 138-523. Special exceptions. (a) Upon application to the board of adjust- ment and favorable action thereon, pursuant to article II, division 7 of this chapter, the following uses may be permitted in the R-3 district: (1) Day care center. (2) Group homes, category 1. (3) See section 138-240 for other special ex- ceptions which may be permitted in this district. (b) Nonresidential uses approved by special exception or conditional use shall not exceed a floor area ratio of 0.40, or an impervious surface ratio of 0.60. (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(206.3), 1-;30-90; Ord. No. 92-66, ~ 1, 10-27-92) Sec. 138-524. Conditional uses. (a) Upon application to and favorable action by the board of county commissioners, pursuant to article II, division 8 of this chapter, the following conditional uses may be permitted in the R-3 district: (1) Utility substations. (2) Government buildings and public uses. (b) Nonresidential uses approved by special exception or conditional use shall not exceed a floor area ratio of 0.40, or an impervious surface ratio of 0.60. (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(206.4), 1-30-90; Ord. No. 92-66, ~ 1, 10-27-92) Sec. 138-525. Property development regula- tions. (a) Maximum height. No structures in the R-3 district shall exceed 45 feet in height unless otherwise provided in this chapter (see section 138-1277). (b) Minimum building site area requirements. The minimum building site area requirements in the R-3 district are as follows: (1) Area: Six thousand square feet. (2) Width: Sixty feet (see section 138-1279). (3) Depth: Eighty feet. Supp. No. 30 CD138:48.1 . . '. ~t ~ 138-525 PINELLAS COUNTY CODE See section 138-209 for lots or parcels of substan- dard dimensions. (c) Maximum building area. In the R-3 dis- trict, a minimum of25 percent of the lot or parcel must remain in open permeable space. \ Supp. No. 30 CD138:48.2 J' . (d) Setback requirements (see also section 138- 1281). In the R-3 district, the following minimum setbacks shall be required: . (1) Front: Twenty feet, measured from any right-of-way line to a structure. (2) Side: Six feet. (3) Rear: Ten feet. (e) Special requirements. The density of the R-3 district shall not exceed one dwelling unit on each 6,000 square feet ofland area or the density permitted by the comprehensive land use plan, whichever is less. (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(206.5), 1-30-90; Ord. No. 94-36, ~ 1,4-19-94; Ord. No. 00-67, ~ 7, 8-29-00) Sees. 138-526-138-550. Reserved. DIVISION 8. R-4, ONE-, TWO- AND THREE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT See. 138-551. Deimition, purpose and intent of district. The R-4, one-, two- and three-family residen- tial district is comprised of areas where the de- velopment of single-family dwellings, duplexes, or triplexes is appropriate. It is intended that such areas be located in or near urbanized areas where good transportation facilities and urban services are readily available. This district shall include all areas indicated on the zoning atlas maps as R-4. (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(207.1), 1-30-90) See. 138-552. Permitted uses. Within any R-4, one-, two- and three-family residential district, only the following uses shall be permitted: (1) Single-family dwellings. (2) Duplex dwellings. (3) Triplex dwellings. (4) Customary accessory uses when acces- sory to permitted uses, including but not limited to: a. Home occupations (see section 138- 1335). Supp. No. 19 . ZONING ~ 138-555 b. Accessory dwelling unit (only on lots where one single-family residence is located). (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(207.2), 1-30-90; Ord. No. 99-66, ~ 12, 7-20-99) See. 138-553. Special exceptions. (a) Upon application to the board of adjust- ment and favorable action thereon, pursuant to article II, division 7 of this chapter, the following uses may be permitted in the R-4 district: (1) Day care center. (2) Group homes, category I. (3) See section 138-240 for other special ex- ceptions which may be permitted in this district. (b) Nonresidential uses approved by special exception or conditional use shall not exceed a floor area ratio of 0.50, nor an impervious surface ratio of 0.75. (Ord. No. 90-1, ~ 1(207.3), 1-30-90; Ord. No. 92-66, ~ 1, 10-27-92) See. 138-554. Conditional uses. (a) Upon application to and favorable action by the board of county commissioners, pursuant to article II, division 8 of this chapter, the following conditional uses may be. permitted ill the R-4 district: (1) Utility substations. (2) Government buildings and public uses. (b) Nonresidential uses approved by special exception or conditional use shall not exceed a floor area ratio of 0.50 nor an impervious surface ratio of 0.75. . (Ord. No. 90-1~ ~ 1(207.4),1-30-90; Ord.No. 92-66, ~ 1, 10-27':'92) Sec. 138-555. Property development regula- tions. (a) Maximum building height. No structure shall exceed 45 feet in height unless otherwise provided in this chapter (see section 138-1277). CD138:49