Loading...
FLD2003-09045 o . CASE #: I1-" ~ 't) 3 - 0'1 0 ttfr DATE RECEIVED: ~~ ~ It) 03 RECEIVED BY (staff mitials : .;J ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Rorida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 D SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION D SUBMIT 13 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans D SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ * NOTE: 14 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS) FLEXffiLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive InfiB Redevelopment Project (Revised 06/23/2003) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- use additional sheets as necessary A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: j;;. L..I A? AN A ~ -rA $ 0 f 0 U /-fA 7 MAILING ADDRESS: (p 30 c? (frU L TV / G Jr../ 131.VD . C.tG~A7&(2... I r l- . PHONE NUMBER: 727- 4(0 \ - 1300 727-~I-'i3oo Gl./A ~ IV-IA7/A-5ofO"il-PO:5 (Must include ALL owners) E-MAIL ADDRESS: CELL NUMBER: . FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): AGENTNAME(S): Al.t~ pf..".'~/~"D Pt-If?I-'1D 1<)/2.u.I1n;:-~TU ~Ei. PA . , MAILING ADDRESS: Boo o,z.e~ &;1' C-lA5AI2JI4/Ji71i?R.. I rl. ~ 37 S;;- , E-MAIL ADDRESS: A(2.LH f ~ V8{2./ ZOfJ , H~/ PHONE NUMBER: 7 Z 7 -44- ~ - 7 zo 0 CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: 727 -# 7- Co cr t~ STREET ADDRESS of subject site: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: 700 ~o u m Gt '-1 rtJ 1el.A.J "')GG ?c;.I+~I?WLG A AtrA6I-1GO (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) / '7 ft.1 / J -7 / 01:507(Pj 00 ~ _0/10 1712.' '/ /~ '10 t;o~o/ oo~/o I~ 0 (acres, sQua~e!t) A ~ IJ.. € Z Z / Z I r; ~ F __ 7Z00 6t~~ 15G7A/t.. 7/0R.I:i 8WD~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL SIZE: (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) NO\( 0 6 2003 PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) ~eG AriAc./-tM6).-1 { A- t;f/ Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater <' "' t DOES THIS APPLlCA nON INVOLVE THE SFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PR 'JSL Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPkOVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) ~ SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A) 'Iii" Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. ?te ).../,kC.#NJ6Il.r7 A 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. ~(f~ J.<-r'rA~#vVJ~ A 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. ~eG k(77QV/-I-M~r A 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ~G ~ -rrn lj.-!,v//;;;/V-r A- 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 78&- A T7""AGHp/lI:5N-r A 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ~G~ Pc TI AC. fJ /;V/elIJ~A ~rovide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) _ Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. ~e -"/71+c;.flH~ A- Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements. ) ~€:d kr-;7+o# ~~ A 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. i ~6G ,Jc~?H Mf9'J'I A 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. ~G~ A7/7Q u-t-/f/J~ ^ 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. . . 7~G A-r-rAc"H/VlS'l'Vr A 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ?~e At7J<Jc.-H Me7V-r A 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ~e6 A 1f)QGfI- Mf?7J'/ A 8. Rexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and oft-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. C;?F3e- A- A-/17OGff~tpVI 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. ~ ).-r/XJGUIA4~ A 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. ~e8' A~~~ / A Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL&UIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) al'SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed); ~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; o GRADING PLAN, as applicable; o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201 (D) (i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenltabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records pook and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 112 X 11) and color rendering if possible o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborisf, of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4--1102.A) o LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales. side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, inclucfmg clripline (as indicated on required tree survey);. .. Location. size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape material.s, including botanical and common names; Typical planling detaIls for trees. palms. shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, bacldilrmg, mulching and protective measures; .. .. Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes o . REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible) o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications) o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21 ) o STORMW ATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond a11.property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; . Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control s1ructure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quafny; Signature of Rorida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMmAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City BuDding Permit), if applicable COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMW ATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable o o I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the eVent the application inclu~ a developm.ent ~re desi9." standards are in issue (e.9- Tourist and Downtown bistricts) or as part of a Comprehensive InfiB Redevelopment Pl'OJect or a ReSldentiallnfill ProJect o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including. height dimensions, colors and materials o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of buDding with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). o Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. Page 5 of 7 - Rexible Development Application - Comprehensive InfillHedevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . K. -TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) o Include as required if proposed development will degrade -the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent ~Jtion of.the ln~e of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to thIS reqUIrement L SIGNATURE: 1 the underSfgned, acknowledge that all repreSentations made in this ~pIication are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge -and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINElLAS _ Swom .to and subscribed before me this ~ day of .fi~ A.D. 20~ to me and/or by - A e I"l er /5 k 0 . who is' personally known has p~~ ~ P~O-~-48-~77-~ as identification. ~~~ ~_~~D NotarypubD , My commission expires: _ OARlENEo'RWD ~ MY COMMISSION #00250063 '~ EXPIRES: SEP 15, 2007 . OF Banded Ihrough Advantage Nolaly Page 6 017 - Rexible Development Application - Comprehensive InflIl Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater $ep 16 03 08: 528 .5kO A....ch 72.76814 p.3 M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: S'-'AS ~ASIA. ~Ofout,p-" ~ (NameS crall property 0WT19TS) 1. That (l amIWe aAl) 'heowner{S) and record We hokier(s) of !he IoIkMIng descl1b9d property (address 01' gen;nllocation): "700 ~ouTH. 6r~/,t=VII:;W 13t.\!&:>, c"U5IJ,( ~Tl:iK 86~rt 2. 'That this property conslI1uI8s th& 'prtIp9rly for wtich a request lor a: (descn"be rsqullllt) Mpt;1t -rO ArrAt:-I-fMeNT tA' 3. That the ~ (hasIbave) appointed BI"ltI {doesIdoi appoirt: ALE'f... P'-/~O P"-tS!oSO N?u-II ~~tf.e~ FA .. as (I'lis/Ih8iT) agen1(~) to exQClJIa FInf pG!lItions or OIhElf cloeumlll'ltS ~ to act ;:uoh pCJtltlon; 3. That hs affidaIII't. has been 6lCSC\Jt8d to Induce the Ctly at Clearwatef, FIotitia to conslder and act on th& aboYe described prtiperty; 4. That the appicant adcn:lwIedges that aI1lm;:.aC'L fees (paries ancIl9CI'8alion, traffic, !ltc.) Vl41I b9 paki PRIOR tII the issuariot of a building PElI'1TIit. certiiic:ate of occupancy. or other mechanism. whichever OOCIltS first; . 5. That site v'.si1s to !he property are necessary by City representativas in order tII PlllC9Ss this applicQf.i-~1'I and the owner authorizes City ~s to vtsIt an::! photograph 1he Pl"OP9I'ty ::iescrIbed In this appIica!Ion; . U . 6.. That (u-). thEll.lr1dersigned authority, here::ly eertlfy that the foregoing is true and r9f:!t.: . .~. Prop; COUNTY OF PINRLAS Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, S:\PlanlJing Deps1merIMppb#on Fomr;'CIf1v8Iopment revi9~ infiIl appImaIion 6-23-2003..dac Page 7 of 7 - F19l1ble Deve!opmant Applloalloo - Comprehensive In1i1l !'lecIewIopmQnt Project- City of Clearwater .\- ;. . .~\...~ CCl~T'1' F'LR. i" L""'-I- row ""13 10 OFF' .REC .S\(' 114'5'2: r Schedu1.e A p:a:rce~ ~:; (17/29/~5/D50'76/0,03/o.1:1.0) Lots :1.1. and 12, ;B1.ock C, BAYSJ:DE. SROImS, aeord.;i.:{g Co the p~at thereof. recorded :ic..P:I.a.t Book. 58. Page (s} 1.2 and 1.3. Public Records 'Of Pine1.J.as Couni:yr,P10:r~d.a. Parcel. II: (1.7/29/1.5/05040/005/01.30) . t. Loti.3, B10ck E, Bayside Subd:ivi.sioc.. No.6; U:c.Sot B, accord.i:ri.g to the pl.a.f: thereof as recorded.;i.c.. Pl.a.~ Book 55, pa.ges 17 a.:c..d1B, Pu.b:1.ie Recorda of Pi.n.el.l.a.s Cou:c.ty,~l.ori.~~ ore,g.et:har w:i.th. tha.t part of the Borth 15.0 .feet of. Sou~ Gu.1fvi_ BouJ.evard (D.~W vacated) abutti.c..g Lot 13 of Parcel. J::r on tb.e South. .; Fi1e No: 01-43l.4-1. . . ATTACHMENT A Revised November 5,2003 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 4 feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 2 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to five foot (to rubber matting), reductions on the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting) a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (36 spaces) to 3.19 spaces per 1.000 square feet (23 spaces), a reduction of front (west) foundation planting from 5 feet to 2 feet and a reduction of front (south) foundation planting from 5 feet to 2 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, at 700 Gulfview Boulevard. (Case FDL2003-09045) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed 7,051 SF single story building is in harmony with the existing retail complex at 731 Bayway Boulevard. The two properties are surrounded by Parkway Drive to the West, South Gulfview Boulevard to the South, Clearwater Pass Avenue to the East and Bayway Boulevard to the North. The main pedestrian entrance is proposed to be along Parkway Drive with a secondary pedestrian entrance from South Gulfview Boulevard. The proposed building design, setbacks pedestrian friendly entrances to meet Beach By Design and proposed I.S.R. of .85 will be in harmony with the scale, buck, coverage, density and charter of adjacent properties. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development meets the intent of Beach By Design for building design and pedestrian friendly access. The project is projected to cost 1.2 million dollars and will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Page 1 of 5 . . 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood will not be adversely affected. The existing curb cut on Gulfview next to Parkway will be removed and a vehicular new entrance is proposed 200' from Parkway off Gulfview. This new traffic pattern will make vehicular traffic safer and a well defined pedestrian accesses, will also increase a safe pedestrian route to the proposed building. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Presently the site has 3 vehicular accesses, 2 off Gulfview and one off Parkway. The proposed project is eliminating the drive off Gulfview next to Parkway and making a joint access drive to both properties (700 Gulfview and 731 Bayway) 200' East of Parkway. The Parkway access will be separated by an island to make sure traffic turns North on the one way Parkway Drive. The rerouting of vehicular access points will improve traffic circulation along Gulfview Boulevard. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The project is in the tourist district and required to meet Beach By Design. The proposed development is pedestrian friendly and the building design meets the vision of Beach By Design. The proposed landscaping and exterior building colors will be consistent with the beach community character. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposed project will operate from 9:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. daily to meet the needs of tourist. The buildings architecture is visually pleasing and welcome both pedestrian and vehicular customers to a safe and attractive project. COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from intensity and development standards. Page 2 of 5 . . Beach by Design requires the building to be positioned close to the Right-of- Way to allow for a pedestrian friendly building. The proposed building is positioned on the site not to visually block the East existing building as a car traveling South on Gulfview Boulevard, which is a requirement of the lease for the property. Also, the Owner of the property has required a 30' visual corridor at the East end of the building to allow the public to see the entrance of the existing pub. The proposed project keeps the new building in line with the existing building to the East and moves it close to the Parkway Drive with the main pedestrian entrance at 45 degree angle to the intersection of Gulfview and Parkway. The setbacks requested allow lessee to meet the requirements of the land lease and also make the building pedestrian and vehicular friendly. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The proposed 1.2 million dollar project will increase the market value of the abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the district. The City of Clearwater permits retail stores in the Tourist District. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed retail store is compatible with the restaurants, commercial shops and hotels within the surrounding area. The operating hours from 9:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. daily are similar to the operating hours of surrounding uses and also works well for the tourist. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the mix uses with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. South Beach is densely developed and does not offer other sites for proposed project. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Page 3 of 5 . . The existing building that was demolished was used by a real estate company. The proposed use is tourist friendly and enhances the property by meeting Beach By Design requirements. The increased economic value of the proposed project and proposed site enhancements will compliment the neighborhood. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed investment made to the property will benefit the immediate area through Beach By Design aesthetic character, increased property value and the potential to positively influence other surrounding property owners. 8. Flexibility in regards to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. No reductions in lot width or I.S.R. are requested. The reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 2 feet (to building) and front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk) are required to locate the building close to the right-of-way as required to meet Beach By Design. The lot depth of 112 feet influences the request for reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 4 feet (to Pavement), side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp) and side (north)setback from 10 feet to one foot (to building). The joint use of vehicular drive off Gulfview requires the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet ( to pavement). The developer of the project is proposing an interactive water feature with drainable rubber matting along the east side of the building, with access through the Retail Store which requires the request for reductions of side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to rubber matting)and side (east)setback front 10 feet to three feet ( to rubber matting). The Foundation Planting reductions requested are do the lot depth and trying to locate the building as close as possible to Parkway Drive in the spirit of Beach By Design The Developer operates the Surf Style retail store at Mandalay and Papaya and has no on site parking, and the business is excellent. The proposed project proposes 3.19 parking spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA). The building has a storage mezzanine of 563 GFA and display spaces of 455 GFA, which are not usable for retail sales and reduces the GFA from, 7200 GFA to 6,182 GFA. The 23 sparking spaces would provide 3.7 parking spaces per 1,000 GFA based on the reduced 6,182 GFA. 83 Page 4 of 5 . . parallel off site parking spaces are available within 1,000 feet of the site. (Refer to Attachment B.) 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. There is no off street parking in the immediate vicinity. The proposed parking is adequate for the use of the building realizing that the walking tourist will be a major user of the building. 10. The design of the building complies with the tourist district and Beach By Design. The proposed project is to be similar in design, character and same colors as the Surf Style at Mandalay and Papaya. The design follows the guidelines of Beach By Design as outlined in the above responses. Page 5 of 5 . . Prepared by/return to: Nickolas Co Ekonomides Nickolas C. Ekonomides, P.A. 791 Bayway Blvd. Clearwater, Florida mOl SPECIFIC DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY I, Elias Anastasopoulos, make this Specific Durable of Attorney and appoint my son, Anastasios "Taso" Anastasopoulos, my true and lawful attorney-in-fact (amyattomey"). My attomeyis authorized to act . for me under the General Laws of Florida including, but not limited to, Chapters 709 and section 709.08, Florida StaMes, and I authorize him specifically as follows: In my capacity as Managing Member of E & A Properties, LLC and indMdually, with respect to the execution of certain leases, lease assignments and other agreements relating to the real property located at 700 S. GulMew Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33767 and described as: Parcell: (17/29/15/05076/003/0110) Lots 11 and 12 in Block C, BA YSIDE SHORES, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 58, Pages 12 and 13, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; Parcel II: (17/29/15/05040/005/0130) Lot 13 in Block E, Bayside SubdMsion No.6, Unit B, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 55, Pages 17 and 18, Public Records of Pine lias County, Florida; Together with that part of the North 15.0 feet of South Gulfview Boulevard (now vacated) abutting Lot 13 of Parcel \I on the South. to sign, make, execute, endorse and deliver said leases, lease assignments and other agreements and all other related documents as may be necessary. All power and authority granted herein shall not be affected by my disability, incapacity, or adjudged incompetence however shall in any case only be for the specific purposes recited herein or until revoked. WITNESS my signature and seal this 1S1h day of August 2003. ~ S~AI~~~~ Elias Anastasopoulos , , E;JuJnOJ'l-uof.? .5 . . STATE OF FLORIDA: COUNTY OF P1NELLAS: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1Sthday of August 2003 by Bias Anastasopoulos who is personally known to me and who did take an oath and acknowledged the execution of this instrument to be his free act and deed for the uses therein expressed. ., J Qeelen ""'''"'',,,, Pa.t:ic~a. . co 9023 13 ~ComnnsSlon '# zoM ~&.,...: 'Il'..r..;-" Feb. 15. -.- !.c: P"t'''- ell Thru ~~1E:\i~ Bond. Co Inc. "i;EDf~~': Atlantic Bonding ., 1.111111'" No P lic My Commission Expires: ThiS.~ty Deed &mN F. DE BL~, GLERK OF tni:T PnEW\S COOk1'f, RJJRLt\:\, Made this 26th day of June A.D. 200~ by Steven M. Hasley and Terry M. Hasley. husband and wife 7C1793C() CS:.J29-~j! ib:5Q':OO 51 ilElH~'S!.f.Y !~!mJJ!JB 000000 I#:01224T;il Ji(:11452SP6=0009 EPii:OOlO REImDING 002 PIUS! UO.~ DOG STAMP ;.. DR2lCJ 3 $'1,000.00' EBZ ~ hereinafter called the grantor. to Elias Anastopou1os TOTAl.. ; CIEK AhT .IDIDoo: BY~~ o 1-2247:3 1 JUN-2S-200 1 4: 511"11 p INE:LLA~CO ElK 114S2'PG 9 hereinafter called the grantee:, ' '" " , 1111l1li.. I.IIUIIIII 1111 {WbcnI:vcr Used hereiI1lbc b:rJIl.~ aDd .graJiIee- iDcIude aIl1bc .parUes 10 1hii .b.,.t.~ Uld'the' , JieiB.lePl Ie~~Yes aDd asSips of~. arid 111: suCcessoa iDl ~ of eOi1Jo~) WItnesseth, that thegrairtor. for and in corn:ir1ecition of the sum of $ ~O. 00 and other valuable considerationS. ,receipt whereof is hereby ilCknowledged. hereby grants. bargains. sells. aliens, remises, releises. conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all tba1 Certain bnd situal:e in Pinellas Co1JDl:y, Florida, vi:z: See Schedule A attached here'to and by th.is reference made a part hereof. whose post office address is: fl,(U!I.50 f1,0103) too Grantees' Tax Id'#': SUBJECT TO' Covenants, restrictions, ea.sements of" record and taxes fbr the current year. ' Sa:Ld-prope~ty :Ls not the homes1::-ead. of the Grantor(s} under the laws and constitution 'of the State of Florida in that neither Grantor(s) or any members of the household of Grantor(s)' reside .thereon. :r>arcel Identification Number: 17-29-~5-0S076-003:-01:10 Togetherwithall the tf't'f'"lIlI'!!ItlJ, beredmmv..nts and appurtenances tberefu belcinging or in anywise'appertainiag. <<r:o Have and to Hold, the same ~ fee simple forever.' , And the grantor here1>y cOvenants with said grantee tliatthe ~tor islaWfuL7seized of said land in fee simp~ that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and. convey said land; that thegr3ntor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whOmsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances 'except taxes accruing snbsequent to December 31. , .2 0 0 0 , , In Witness 'Yhereof, the said grantor has signed' and sealed these presents the day and year first ~ove ~~ j Signed, sealed and delivered in OUT presence: .. 1/{fAc"- . ,1'lmII:: tv l c.. ~ /'l...c.;v..... ~~~ . . 0-.. J f<. :J:1: LS [YJ /1== Nome ~ AlldD:A: @ N-=: Nxue <<. ~ [YJ State of County of Florida Pinellas The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .2 6 th day of June 01, by Steven M. Hasley and Terry M. HaSley, husband and wife co ..... ", :':':) O~ <0 . c5!::ii::~ E- ~. ~ ~ ~~::.~ ... ~OO~ ~>t~~ tit:d< ~o=.;~ ~ ~ k :5 ~; o. ~ ~ ':;;lI ~ .' :.'\ ~~~RING D!:' '_ :ON. 7~{)753:i7 ~.~ ;<;.,,~CE COrY; . .,...~ '" '., ~...;" ;~f ~\.\t ~ -~~ ~~ ~\~t~V ..~.-:....'......~' . .... " ~~ 7 ..:- ..::' -=,,.' ~ - :-. - ~A.! 7~ "r"5, L..J "-1 32 PM '76 RESOLUTION D. i. 4415 PAGE 416 No. 76 - 54 A RESOLUTION V ACA TrnG POR TIONS OF EASEMENTS rn BA YSIJ;:>E SHORES. SUBDIVISION AND BA YSIDE, SUB- DIVISION NO.6, AND 'VACATING POR,TION OF CERTArn RIGHT-OF-WAY rn BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION NO.6. WHEREAS, it has been requested by David ,F. Ramsey, owner of ce'rtain re'al property in Bayside Shores Sub~ivision and'Bayside Subcllvision No.6, in the City'of Clear~ter, Florida, that the City of Clearwater, Florida, vacate certain portions of an easement and right-of-way; and WHEREAS, after .proper public notice andpu-blic hearing thereon, the City Commission finds that said easenl'entand right-of-way is not necessary nor required and it is deem.edto :be to the best interest and advantage of the City and the general public that the 'same be vacated; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITy COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEAJ3.WATER, FLORIDA, IN SESSION DULY AND REGULARLY ASSEMBLED, AS FOLLOWS: ~. 1. That thefClllowing: The five foot (5') easement lying along the North Side olLots 11 and 12, Block C, Bayside Shores Subdivision, as shown on map or plat thereof and recorded in 'Plat Book 58, pa.ges 12 and 13 of the Public Records of PinelIas Co1m.ty, Flor~da, AND The three foot (3') easement lying along the North side of Lot 13, Block E, Bayside Subdivision, No.6, UIrlt B, as shown on map or plat thereof and re<:orded in P.1at Book 55, p-.;.-ge.s11and '18 of the Eubli:c Records of Pin'ellas County, Florida, be and the same is hereby vacated, closed and released, and the City of Clearwater hereby quit claims and releases all of its right, title and interest thereto to the persons, firms or corporations entitled thereto by law. 2. That the following: The North 15.0 feet of South Gulfview Boulevard right_~~ lying South of and adjacent to Lot 13, Block,E, ~ion, No.6, Unit B; said Lot 13 bein.g a tract of land not included in . the Plat of Bayside Shores which. replatted the right-of_way of South Gulfview Boulevard as shown~onthe. m.ap or plat thereof and recorded in Plat Book 5.8, pages 12 and 13 of the Public Records of Pinellas County,. Florida, as shown on map attached hereto and made a part hereof, -1_ k/ , . be and the same is hereby vac,,-ted, closed and released, and the City of . O. i.4415 PAC.? Clearwater hereby quit claiIns and releases all of its right, title and interest rnaintenance of all public utilities, including but not limited to water, electric, that the City of Clearwater hereby retains an eas'ement for installation and thereto to the persons, firms or corporations entit.led thereto by law, excepting drainage and storm and sanitary sewer lines, upon said described re;al property. 3. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to record this Resolution in the Public Records of Pinellas County,F1ori-da.. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of May, A. D. 1976. ~~~ Mayor-CO~Ssio _' // -"-'~M1~h" .:;. (~~~0~:: :;;('!::: "<':-~ .-' ~ :.. ~~ :-' -2- N !! ...... Q: Q .)... ~ ~ ~ SOUtH . .D. ~.4415 !'AGE . B4.YW4Y BOULr::-'1 - ~ V"4RD 2 3. SHORES 10 GULF''vlcW BOULEV .4RD . . Iii L . . Z o ~ (;j ...J lU '"' I- Z ~ l!:: ~' . ~ti ~i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ul~m 'I \>. ~~~ ~. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ..~ ~~ q~ d~ \f) ~~ ~~ ~ ~ lL~ . OC~I ~Ili ~ z o ~ ~i~ (;j ug '/ Q Ill. '-' I- ~' ~I L z o ~ (;j id '"' lU n ~. 1-4 Ill, ~ z o ~ ~ lU <~ .. "'1~ ; <~ ~ ..,J..J !; ...;... .. == or . ." f; ~~.... >< < < =- ... '" < 0 U'" 0 ..,-' N _U ~ !-< .:. :a ~ : U::! ~ ~~ C <'" ... O=- ~ ....." . "'''' - f!aC ~ ....10 . ",0 l:; -~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ I I . 0 a: I- a: en ~ ~ 0 LO LL We::( ..- en W ...JO w Z ::>- C> -.J 0 a: z ::s ~ >- III 9 a.. :C I- $ LL I- Z ::) en W .. 0 0 -a: en - >W 0> r- u.. LL r- C\I 0 o::5~ a.. ::> I en a: => (!) 0::: ~ r- ""~'or en en ~ <l: 0 z ::>~ I- r-: 0 00 ..- 0 z en 0 0 I- 0 U ....... w en o-Z 00 w- 65 2:g n. 5~qqq~- i uuu~cju\Li~~~-; uuu~ r/1 c.:; ~ 25 ....l ::: ... ~ t3 Cl ~ o ~ :><: "d d <.Ll " < ~ !;J~ ~~ d~~ ~z ~:Jcncn< ..... ~Icn ~ ~ ~ e; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !: el~....l"gJ~!;J>-uu ~ :>~ei2jt:OOE-<cntr.l ffi o~t:~~~~;;jee u"cn...~_t:E-<< cncn~....l....l ~~.~ ~/O~ [, ~ J,~, N ~~ ~o i's;'~: ~ w Z ~~ ;~ w05 n: 9 ~~ ~~ ::"' > 0 0 " t ~~ ~~ u~~~ " t - ~~ :;>~ -;: ~ N~ ~< ~ 2i ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ 0 0 .....l c; ~o z 0 ~ ~g_w~ Z~"5~z~ ,"~'m w:, ~~: i~~ >: ~ -' II !il j>wBwon ~~ O:::(L w~2 ~ o\Z. .,- ii ili! i !!iI!nil ~ I lloIp"$:) n-l-\I nng 4:l.r'109\;';;\.~~~-~~;;;;--.nno lll-nasl:1 :.llN .~~:;;; . ~ ~ 0 gli~L 5C Q \~~"'~ ! !~! E: ~ ?~g ~ ;:;. V>.</I ~ rn 2~~ p 5 ~ 0~ YI ~ ~~ = ~ i1J ~ U;;, ~~; i :;: !=! 'fI~. l~!i! J; ~ ~~ ~~<" ~ Q ~~ ~ r: ~ iiJg ::.lg 5 f:: < g .....l f-< ~ o g; A\IItIJ:OUN -;;.~ -m~ . roo/! 'H d's ;"UO lUl.J -,/ ~... =i:~ _vcra.>'II___.IaU't-'9 SilIOIDl:\\-"'^---'-~lOI SlNNMflJ .:nr~~:;l.Iv:)I;'(\NV1 ')NIlfT.INr.Jl'nlW'J ')NI'L,'A LVDl'S'SY-"')VAVDULn : m :: : ; : ~~ I ;~! ~~ · ~ ~~: " d~~ ~~8: e ^ - il , iwi.: ' ~ 0 e Q ~;~<< ~ ~ ~b n~ "2 ~ ""!?'~:o: l; ~ ~~~ I~ ~~ ~~ <> ~~ .- VI,.. 0.'" ~~2~:' "w'< g ii~~:;~: -~ "'. ~~~: ";!9 ~ ~!w ionm!~ ~! ~II ' .' ~Dww ~i ~~ h ~~ ;! :~ii ~~ ;: ~~ z ~, e~i . SY1t 'll1lllLYM'(v;rt) LmlSlo\4IlIOOll Vd 1IlIflDllIIDlIV OlISlld " 9~z ~~~ ~;~ ~~~ ;~! l;~~ m~ ~~~i ~~g~ l'5tn:E'" m~i is ~ 1!! illll! ~ -, ~ ~ ~~~~~gi ~; II!! i JIIII! mil '"'5" ~l;!~~i Hm ;~~!: ~~m! mm ;l~~~~ ~n'~~~s ~ 'z ~<g5 ! 1111: >- Cl~""Zil' ; li!il ~ to ! i rn w ~ ~ ~~ i i~ :i ~~ ~~ g Ihi ~S:o~ iW ::~I :~&~& ~~'l'!:i~ ~~5i~ mi~ ~ii~~ !Iil! ,c ~;, ~~o ~~ '" g ;;>i VI tt !:"~ ~5 ., 0' .' . ;: il! ;;: II ~~~ ,.. ~~ i!I ~! ~ ~~ ~"'~ :(i~ ~~ m,"~i ~;~, 5 .' Ow jz'~ :~~ II ~; 30 ~o 8~< ~x ~_g" i~i <" ~i ~5 i~ i!~ ~l~ m ~~~ ~~~ ~8~ bll ~~~ ~~~ iH 2 ZZ :='~ !I-o~:w~ ~~ w ~wlw ~~ai5 - "'''' giO m; Ii ~: ~~ ,,~'" ili 1~5 ~!~ 8':<3 :~~ , :\ ~ .1 ~w~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~~! ~ ~~ :9::;lll:~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ i z .. ~~tn 8 i~ g h~~ ,~ ~~ ~ 8~~~ r" ~~ : ~~w II: ;! !l : !ill!, Ii ;; !o~~~_ ~~ ~. '~3 ~~ i~ : ~m ~f :i ~ n '..i!! Ii u' VIi i8~~ ~~ .zW 8:<; ~~ .0 ~- ~i ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~5~S~ !!ll! im~ i~I~~ ,;~h:~ < ~U!~ ...<t8~iil ;I~;: 8~~~~ ~~~~~~ :n ~~i i~g ~~~ :~~ ~,. .~l ~~;S m~ liii ~IE : !~i -=- 0:10 :!ii ~m ~~~ m [;;iOi? ~loE' ~F' :\~ i! ~~ ,~~ ~~~ iil ill t:ig !~: ~~~ :~2 m m !:i~ ~ I ili! ; ~~~: ~ ~m ~ inl' !5'~ ~S'et; j: ~1!~' ~ mi: Sa.LON 1VllaNa~ . ~ VQIllOCId 'll:ol.LVNtllV:oI'IJ ,_~,..~ "lOUV8()llJ:J'O~rl '--- -- _ _._____ ~ "'- QlSSO<IfIl ~ QJI<lOi ..""n "',.^1""<lllIf(ltt]o"'..'o....8 NOI1JIl~lSNOJ .ICU LON ~ '" ~ 0 ! ~ C'\I ~ ~ (,) ; li '" :il!! Iii!! ~iil ~~ !~ ~; !~f ~:~ m m ~,:_ 2,"~,_, " ;; m b{; i :: : 0 ~ iiz g -' ~t: ~ ~~ ~ _ ~ >-~ ~12 <5 '" :: ~~ ..... ~ ~ ;i ;\ II, ii! ;; ~~w~ "e~ w:! ~' ~i ~~~wW r:' ;i ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~- p,! ~i !~~ g':< <t'" ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ii'~~ m m ~i~ <<wl'; ;~~ m 8j~ )g8~ iU; 1:"''''0 i!~~ lil!l lil!1 nAIS ,!)I{lS ;b~ ~~ ~~ ill ~:I ~E ~~~ E,,~ &Ifi ii?~ Ii! 1m ~m i~f~ ;;;::J::'5~ : .~~ ::::'i i08 ~ ,W ~ 2i~ ~ t~ '2 Q 'g~ : ~j ~ ~~ t- ~t w ~! ~ g~ ~ ~~ <t ~~ ~ iil I,!l!! nm;g "'~Og~~-" !mm ~m~~: m~m F\!!----' !I!! "'So'" !ill m~ i~i! i~ go ~i Ii g:3; ~~ ~i !~I ~~05 !~~ lIb !lli! ~8go~ ! !!!I m;; wO !lll!! '.- i: Ollw.li'wo :! ! i III! ,~j!~! i!i '~~~da~:."~~~~ il!i!II!ll!i!!i ~.ON II: <<\1' ~~~~~ ~~;ii ii !l! !~m ~&;z~':i um '"~~J . . lIl1t 'H'mYM'4W1J .liIlr4ISMmIQOOIl Vd 11IlJ.L)[LJID)!V O"llSl1d NVld J:JVNIV~O ONV '9NIOV~9 '9NI^\ld VGIHOld 'H:'I.LVM.HV31J ",,,,,^JOt< g'''''''''ffiIll,su",,'e NOILlfl<IlSNC):J 00.. JON ~~~ 5(<IK\QIl.TH....TAlI.I:ILI\o"! ~W......Tf..'4...-nMfD ~J :ntrl-I"J"JJJ..OW:UV'J';'QN\fl 'IN!'l'=I-:lN1'JNJ11^D ')NIS'~ LV[)()SSY<'.NAVLI UrT:i ~ ~ 1Il Z 0 ;:: <( ..J ::> g ;;: <( 0 II: " W ... ~ <( ~ ~ ~ 5 5 II: 0 ... 1Il 8. ~ ;nus runs \l s s ~ '!~~~,- ' ----- - ----- /\ "1E.R ~ -;-' /:;CCCCC' , \ o'l'l,... _____ ',.;.f" ..<~c:~>7- _j'~~, C\..E./).,,// - f \3L\}\) , -<~<~/ ~--- ';, /~7>~~r~:~~0,~d,\1..r\\:~\ \ .--~ -.....~-_- _-:::.-_-_-- \ '-.) . \ \ \ III \ IjC~----" --_~c:.--:::--::::..::;....- \ __ ----\ \ \ \\\ // _---- \I\lnl \ \ ' \ \ \\\ In \ \~U-\ \ _----" - \ III )1 \ \ \ \ \ \ __-; - \ \\\ \ II \ \ \ \ _ ,_ - -., \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ __----CJ:,-t:'f;--- \ \ \ \ \ \\\ II \ \ \ \ \ --,--'~-- 1._-1 I"" \ \' " \\ \ \ \ \ ,.\_--:---c.:::-:';',"'.:'; c._-':,- _ -- -..,- ~\\ \ \ \ _ \ \\\ \ II \ \ 1f".r--:-:1-------4:S \ \~\... \l__-J___".l \ \ II" II \ \ "f" __- \ r-' -- \ I II II \ \ \ t- \--- \ · \ \ I II \\ \ \ -<0;' \';,\'1\ \ \ \ '~ __----1\ \/ / \\ \ \1 \ K"-"""- - ') \\1\ \ l _~ I I \\ \\ 1\ \.-:::>-__:..- I\\~ \ \ \ 'I. --/- \ \ \ 1\ \\ 1111\\ _--/ t \ \ ~ \) ___--\ 1:\ \ \\ \1 I I t ~ \ \ ~ \ \ 1\ 1\ I 1~1 _-- l \ \ \\\1;1 __----"'\ ~,I \1 \ \\ ; \ r- \ \ \ \ \~'4 _--.j \1 \ \\ \; \ \ I~.- - - - - \9 J \ \ \ \ -- \ 1\ \ \\ II \ \11 1\\\\ , \ ~ -----\ II \ \1 1\\11~----- \\\\\ \ \~ _-1\'\ \\ \ \1 \ 11\1 r'>.!ll \ \ \ 1 ----- \ \ \ II ill \ I ;------ '1 \ \ Im\~ _---!I \ \ \\ II 1 I \ ,.____ ,\ \ 1\\\1 - \ II \ II 11\11~;- 1\ \ \ ~\'l" __-_-,\1\1 \\ \ \\ \ \1;----- \j \ .-'- ~ ~j ~,.\\ -----\ \ \ \\ 11\ \ 1 r----- 1'\\1\ \ __,- s=L< -- \\ \. _-----~ {\ \ \,; \\ \ \ ~----- ;,I~ \- -,'- ;\_~ _--\ '\ \ \~ \1 \ I 1 , \ II I .-- \ ~ \ II \ I~ \ II L___j!\ I' I ,) I" \ II ~..ll______ "I !J-~ -- Il " \ ~ \ I , \- I I II \\ l"rrl r==~~-=l r~~=~l I ~ \:: II I' 1/111 I I: \. II I \\1 \\ ' ~~~ I ~ : , L___] I: :1 :: I 1\ .-1~------) i I ~ ()Lj ; : 5! - 111 I~ II Ii' '\r---- I I ~ I f I I IWzl1 \1\\1_____ :: I ~: :>u il::~~:: \11 \ \, i :: H ~.~~ I: h ---il: :~"-:: C \\ \ \1 ~----- :: I ~: ~I ~ ~~ - ~. I I ~l,_ 11 a: \\ \ \\\------ I : ;~ g ~>'w:. :} ~~ ~g ~ <C I \ ,_ I I J UW ~~::~ fflrt ~~ ~!ti ~- ~~ I > \1 I \ r---- I I I _ .'~ 1/111 6: :;:.f:::- g~ ~"l\ II \\ \ 'I~ ~----- : : ~~ ~a \ ,;i I I:: I W \\ \ 1~----- ~,~ ~ ~~I trll_l\~~~~__~ Ii.: ::~~I...J II \ \ \ 1I11I i / - ~i '~~~11::> !,! I !, t==== r',':~ I 'I \, r I J", , "ir ~~['I ~ ,: " ': I , c ::' .... : : : I i - - - - - : ~ ! I ~: ~~ ~ :: :1 ~'----- :!' I :: ~:3; 13:~ " 'IL---- "I I N I ~"p"'~ jWR II I I I I l' -~\II ~1o'i'o- :: :I~__ :~ I i~, ~~;e :> : : : I ~ _ ~ I ~ -- = ~ ~ ~ i 7/'"1 ~ ; : ~ ~ "~ u.. :: :1 L_~~~ ~~~t~'-~:--':~-,;~_~_II 1- : :: ~~ I..J :: : \" ) ,,~/ \: fa..J :: ~;[ :::> :: ::1......... ,,---:'<J~ ~<~ :: H~IC) " '1 r --- C'">-_"- I 2., o.~O, .-W-------' I II I' _- '- lOW.... - II i: : : IL.-- __-- __~, :iD:0 :: :t: :1 l~1 ~-- - Ja .. II ll- :i I L--- ~ __-:~ ~~ :~ f::::> , II -- -I .... II 0 II I _- -" I II i5,.. :: ~-- __ // _JI :: ~ ~ 'JfJ I: ~ I - I :: ~l\~ I II r ___ ,,-1 II f:l.-;"'- " II -- ,,- I II ~.o \: r" _ Ill! II ~",e :t~ I ~,,-" C--- II ~i II I :--- --~-~ ~~l \\ I ~"''''''''L~ ,!t~ I ';, _L'.::, --------- ~ I <~'c__cd; '" ~..... ~ - --------- ~: l ------=----- ~ -~ ~--..==-~~-~-= ~~i ~ >,., <:, ~=~- - -- - ~~.:..~--===-.."~::===-== ~~~ < 3^IH(fAVM:-'i~-~~=_~ -- '3:- -~. i .....0 \f d -------- l '0' , I - - ~I ':.1 I . I I I - I I \' \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ , \ , \ ci > ..J lO >-I'-t <( . ~,il ~l lO, I , I , I , I , I , L_ , " 0 '<t ,,' () i i I ~ ffi ... o z w I!) <( z <l II: Q o Z <( " z Q <( II: " ~~ d~ ii .< 00 vl ii i ~! 6~ ., 00 <0 I ~~ ~ " o~ -.t~ ~~ "z . 00 Bi-= 'z i '3 n .< Ii 00 ~~ 00 ~I' m, Oz ~~ IZ ~~ " Z ;; <( Q. g. ~ . . lYIt 'H 'ULVM.1VID .mmM.llli(JOOV Vd mIllDillIDllV O)l5fJd Nlild SJI1IlIJ n ~'~ i*$11,:;S4 xv. ...w.:.t.;..... _\Qw:ru--"'Il~'l ~y~~.lJ.DlI'tfd.l\09dNV1 ~;;~=~ .)NI c,UVLX)L,'C,'V~')V^vULlIn 01 ffi a S ~ F- ;t 0 w ~ ~ ~ ...J d ;':: d ~ n ::' 'i ~~~~xa ~2 ~~~ ~. c VOIlI01..J 'mUVM.lIV31J <fLUS lliflS , ~ ~ z ~ < n I ~ t \ \ , \ , \ , \ , \ , \ , \ , \ , \ o > ..J al >I'~ <( . 3: ,ll ~I al, I I I I I L OI"'^'''''O=~~=~~:': NQIUn<llSNQ:I HOJ ION ~o ~~~ LO i ~; i() ill ~~iJ CI) r~<>: ~ ~~~ = l?~~ ~ un t:rl ~~ ~~ " ~i:) ~ z f5~ !~ ~~ ,0 w. _z t:'~ ~:;] 0< ::'j <F <F zo ~ .sF ~~ "'u ~i ::<,u s~ I F ;t~ @i 6 ~~ ~~ i! r;j Ii ~8 o~ - F 'iP ~: 00 ~s ~ <0 ~g u, I~ OW il; z ~i .0 ~. ~~ ~~ Ii 0" o. ~~ .I 0 "'0 8" 8- ~'O \ L \ , 10 a: <C > W ..J ::> ,0 lal 3:~ w~ :> u. ..J ::> ,Cl I ;;, r~1 I L i; -=--_~~~~-== _~~-~----.___ ~ II .::;~ 3------ .,...- ~ --~-- . "'Ha--i--------- - -- -~ ---', ' " V M "U ----__.J;::I: - --4 ---i "a V d !!Jura: ----.' ><- ...... , p.:.Jf.t~U.s- - ------- - ------- . \ ER ~~~--~ ---, ' E"o''''/i.1 ~. ,.f" " ..<--'-' \ C' 1""'1""" .- ----- 10 ~rf'\ ----:-=---"1 1<'::, \.o~' ------- DU' 6L~V' /~~:<~>/ './-~ "~, ______- _______ _ G _ ~ <~/ '" ~:::::-~. '\, ' f'~">'~;:~&,50iiii~~;~11. / ~-,:--.~:\\\\~::\ \\ // \...r--:---~---\ \,,,,,,"'1-- \ \ 'I III ({', , '1"11\ \ \ -eo/I '\ \ \\\ II \\ I, \ \ ,eoeo, 'I" \ II ' \ -~/-\ I,,',', \ II \ \ I, \ \ .-- . " " ' ' _..-~-r:~'r-eo': I I " \ 'II II \ \ \ \ \ ___""rr--':::.:;:::'>-'- /\ _-\' \ \ \\ \11 \ II \ \ \ \ \ _---4-- .ll''''' __...~ iff'rI \ \ \\'\\\\ II \ \ \ _""'-----_....-~ _,...- \\\\\ \ 1 - III \ II \ \ \/~.r:_\~--- __;- ""'" - w \ IIIII I 1 i' \ III II 1'1 t-';.-., - \ 1''1 ,eo,:'-/, , 'I \\\ II - \ ,-;,-,,< \ , \ \ 1\\ II \ ~_""_,,,~ IIlI' \ \ \ \ -----, \/ I II II I \ L>->- \\~ \ \ ~ i !,' II \ 1\ ; ;'1 ~'I \ I', ,--/ I \ \ II II \ II \" ~ \ \ \ 1tfi',J /--/\ \\ \ \\ IIII \ \,\\eo-- "\ \ ,,,,, ' ", " \ \ \ \ \\1\\ -- ~ \\ \ II \ \ I \ t _ 1 \ #"", 1 ~ j \ \ ',:: :'\____ \,,'; \ \ ' \ ---, I" II \ I U\\' \ ~ - \ \\\ \ \ i\ \ \' r----- \\~ \ \ \ ~ ---- -\ II,' II Iii ; ;\~__.___ (' \ \ \ \ \ -~ \ \ II " ' , ' . , ' , /,- , " II \ I \ \ \ \ \m~ - - - \ \\ \ \ ;: ; '~; _,--' ., \ \ "," '-, "" II \\ ; \\;______ \ \ \ J '~'" ,/---', 'I " II I I' ,_ \,,'; \ .-. - - - ".\ ._J l" " \1 [-- - 11\\\ ,.J.-- It\ --- \\\\ II ::::',____' ,,';\ 1..---- 1" eo," \I II I \ I (\ \\.-~ - \ \:\ \ \1\ :~~i: L___, ' , " , /--..~ " " II _ "\ ,i I \ ) 1 11 " \ _____" l \ r!~ ...........J \ II :: ~:~ r~---l r--~~ :: \/:: ':: :', ' 1:~ I I I : : '. ': : :: II, ;f--,-J-------I I I ,I U I , 111 '1 II \( I \\r---- ~ I I ! ----1.1' I II :: : : ~___, :: J : i ---~ : ,: ',: " , ,,' :: Ii: ---.; ,l: :: \\ \ \'\t~~~~: : i I : : 'ill/it :: \ : l---- :: I : : ~ II :: , :" :: , ~~,:: : \\\'~"l~~~: U J ~--~- ~~ i':::ii Ii 'I : ~____, 1111' I I f:,c=c_ "'''~_.....e'''.:'' :' " " ~:~ I II . ----- ,i,:: :: , : i--- :: I J d . ":: ::::Ii----- II i ~8:1 " ::::I'~---- :i J'~ ~ :: : : i-- :: I I tl ,: II I 1 I I I I ~ II ::::'r----:: I~I :: :: ::j'i- :~ /--~--~ i :: :: :: ~;-~~) CE"tc~~;-:-::-~:.~::;-tJ --. :: :: : :,:' .# ",~-y " I 0 :: II I II'..""'''' \1 ~ W..Jw II ::: :Ii ~/ c<:::~il ~~~ :: II I I L----- \...- I' Q.w~ II II I I I ___-- ~~..I ~ rz: (I) I: 'i ~!/ I :: l~, ~/. ,~ 0. er:c :J: :: I' :// /J,~I I",: E:: - ,l- " ,_ /~ ", Ill,,!" '~I::> :: :../~ ./i t:;::: i; 0 II .., I ~ , r..-, yt II ,~ " , ' /: ~:~~:: ~~ ',P) :: I i ___---~--...\. I I II \ II 1..----- ~---~~ I 1 jI I II II I ~-- ~ JII!- -I II 't ,/ :1 ~ : i-- C--"> \1, LC/' -~~ \\~;~~~;==:;;~~~;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --:::::::::::.::-~:::::-.:::::::_.::::: :>,-ICIJ1'U 8~~ W 5g~ I- 0"'5 o ~~~ Z ~..-<.:> ~~, i lill . ~J4 *~"~~~ ,;~-,--"~-- ~~ :'~~~~ 'JNDfJ"'JN~lWJ """""" """T.lil-<"':~;'"N^VL~LL1,n )NI S'U V'I)O'< , !Il.Il: liI'VllLYMYVlID JmIS M31IlI 008 Vd TlIlU.JllHDllV O)JS!'Jd IlOJ Q}~~dJ!kj ~;! ! '" 1 I: 1:(.101 t L !!! ILl ~ =-== : ~ ; T . ~ i L",~ , !iil! ~!i"'~~ ~~~~~ !im ~'j .'" 1., I; -,~ ~ <I ~ ~ ~ L :. j ~ '~,,:~ , - ~ fa .. ~~ I h ;~. _1 .. i.; I: '----- "~ l' '0 I 5~ ~ " Ii I 1.1 ~ ~ i~~ iF~ ~~ !~5 ~~i S~i i~ i ~ ~ I " i~ ~i I ( I, i~ !: l I n n H " ~}; l w~ in\. elHtl j d . SlIVJ.30 3!IS VQlH01"r 'H:O.LVMHV:O:::?,~, '"~"' nA..1S lliIlS .lrIVtI lJTO~<l ~C! ::; c~ ~ ~ I ~ " I i.l : ',!" ~l.lll ~",..", ~~:~~ ~ '~r'- "'~ --' ", '" ,,~, . </,,5 ~~E~~ ~_ -, ~!~!~ l~,i. ~'5~ ~~ I MIl! ~~~ ~~ ~ i3 ~ i;~i:~ ~ t !~!!~! H 11\ i=1 '0 >. 5~ ~ ::~' 1i~, D ;0 g ~ ! i ~ r" ~ ~i ~ ~ ~, ' ; '. i. i , I ! I- ;~ .. ~~ , gi I QcJ ~ <( z o ~ 5 w ~~ l 00 ~ fi () o z o 0.. , i ~ '. . .., lu ,I wO ~r- 8 :s ." ~~ ~~~ woo "'w ~tu ~5 z 8 '0 ~ ~ illl ; i jilin! it il ,'. m ~;I I"' , · ..J U I Ii "'< IH ;. IIi i ~tu ,H~r 1-~- il! ~ ~~ 1-, Ii. 'wO .llll i ~ ~I~ i wt~ UJ..' 'I-~ l' .. P~!2 tu=> · : ~ ~-- 1 _ '11'lji 5~ ..:' ;: .~i: -. -~H ~ I~I ~~ a iii!.! 88 h i", ,,! ~ I.,,,: II ..,~ i" "hill! "l.J ~ , · i ~~i~;~ ~~ i · !llm! . ~::a ~. 'Jlj().j::>dJJ..OllV~ ~-~~ )NI'~..::J LVr.X)C:;~V ~V1 'IN_InJNl9N:11IAO . ... ')v^VZfIU~-;j ~i g ~ i n :;0 dH! d ; ':i: .0 i l~ ~ \!; to 3 i !~.: Ui~~ ; ; ~ i .' ...... ~g_u;>-=> ~ ~ Q ~ il ~ I i) .! !!~i!i! II ,t , ..' .~ ""e,'" . ~ . ^'" :; ~:- ~~ ~;"'::~ ~ ~;;I? m~: .:: ~t: ~1~~~~ ~ ~:1:~ ~....g . ::: ~I mm~MIM~1 Eli n ,. v '. ~!;! : JV.t;>'Y u_i::i .; it~~ ~~.H ~~ ~ ~.~; 4:,: @') ii;~ ~ &~~ . ~ ~~j~ ~ .. ~_ ~ ~ ~:!3 toot ~ ~a.~;; ~ ~ 15!!~ ~ 8 l,;;is ~ .!~; ,,,( ~. 0.. ~ . ,?:_~Il:lSJO SSIlt 1d"1llU.YM1IVirD JaiI'lISMnO:OOIl Vd llIllD3l.IID'IIV OlSlld SlIV130 31IS VOIHOld 'H3.LV MHV3.1J In.... IJlI-lS r..oU.~:)OlLJ:J'O<Id n.us ,IllilS 5 >= u w (/) j ~ ~ I- "" ~ ~ u; if :i; ~~I '0 i!i I . I~ i i ~~ I .. ~ ~" j! ~ r~ ~~ j! " ~. p , ; ~i i. ~ B~ ..: ';;~ 0- m'l"' !Ii :!!:~ :! n ~ i III a: => o I- :I: ::l ... a: I- U> I: ,; t~ ,. U> e~!:i !! w J'~ ," > ~:JO .. ~ . I- o. ... . '" ~ 0' a: t I- ~~ (., ~ ~ I- "r ; f~ H i~ ~~~ ,. . t!~ ~~ I, ~f ~ .e~" ~ H~~ ii~h . ' . ' '.' "~ -s. - i~ .; !~ , . - i~! :4 !! ~ ~ [~, .. .11 . .L r ......: :s...... N ~ 0 r:J.t .8 a... & '" I -'S ,H I ';;;r ~l 01 n s~ldaO X>J ~ c; 'i' ~ lIS tal ~ <~';:I~:SJ .\1 '""!OI Si"'"^ ~~id !~1 j ~~;~~~~~~~~j~~ ~E ::L~ !ili1 ~~~~I~" ,.c=~ 'hj~li ; _o~s '" ~~ ~ ~ T""" ~~~ cO ideU ~ ~ t: J:: PI N o Z I- 8 u- p w a. >- l- I- 8 u- )~" ~~ _~.;u..... _lU.nl~'I{_\1Lflo~ ~'l.V'll..'IW'~UI 'JNNNV1.I 7llrJ.cn.lj.j')W~ 'JNllIT.lNf.:l!'l"JlIAD )NIS"A LvTX )S'S'V' ~ 'W A,-ZI LlU;i tl ~ P;~~ ~ B~: . H ;1 aJ>lS ~-.o:j.sn:) "IllS "PltI -' ... ~ UJ o Z o ... I- U UJ Z Z o U UJ U ..... > a: UJ en :~ > .';j " ~ !~ i~".j , ,. -,.!:. ~ ~~ :~;i!~. i~ ~I;!H;~ i~ ~;;.iHi~ -.,""~oi~~ ~ ~~ ""!i""' ;.,. .~~.h.: '!~' i~!i~~~" ~~-~ r.~~~e.. ~[j~. ;Ef~!lk ..t'eM!'!~,'~i:~ ~=;!~i~;!~~;; ~.e'~~'i~~eim ::n"~~m~:. :n,,:i~~i~.e~ iG~i~;~:~~i~: .mii~i~~~~1i L.. .; .. . .~ ~l .R ~~ -;1. ~~ !~i :j i ,Ht3 \i i~'~ t~!~ d j. llH l! illl -' f[ IT , ~ ...l4 1_ 1\../ I ~ "lr . ~ ~ . IY!t 1.i ULVM1VJD JMlLS M1l1O OOB va iflIflDWlD'tIV 01Sl1d S1111130 ~3M3S ON1I ~3111M VQICl01..I 'C1:>lJ V MClV:>l1) ~i ~ ~ J ~ 5 i~ if . .~ !~ ". ' ~ il~ '.0 ~~~ -' :;c .... w o .... ::> o ~ w -' u ., ~L ~! t~ ..~ ~i! :1 " . s~ '" . 'i ! ~H !-, -:. 1~8 !Ii! ! i,! lUll 5iS 'I' ; ;!; ,'1, .! hi . .. ! Ii ~ . . 1'; ::!! :~ ; " ! I :.~ i ~ j;i ~ ;!: , :g . LL ~ -' lXl : ! i ~ )) \ a ;~j' i !ii' Iii l. " ~i \ il I I ;j g ~ i.. !j :8 ... HI hl-;i ~ !~" iUJ!' !ij dii 6h .. ~;i ~~f ~~ ~ t ~ i~i ;~.~I :ii I~!!i i~~~ . Uh .. h " \\ n i . , !! "" I- z E~ ':i r ... <C ~ a: C) rC""""'~l I- en z .lJl,ft .9 . ,~ )1 UJ ... a: l- I- UJ UJ en ~/ ,/ 0.. UJ ... > '" 0.. -' ) <C ,"'I z > /~; 0 -' a: <C ~ ... u ... .;., ~ UJ 0.. H .. H -' >- ." ... l- .. ~~ :1 I- ~6 u 8" ::::> .. 0 .. '. h " ~2 i!; u ;~ 5~ ;~~. !~ :~ ~=! ~ I- Z ... <C a: I- en UJ a: UJ 0.. ... 0.. . , i , I ! u lh: I .. ~t;i!i i > 1l!~. I I iii!!!! 0.. ! CO",,, -' ... z~ "'UJ ;'io 01- a:::::> ~~I z<c ::::>UJ -' U . ~ ~ , 5 ~ .. "I! I " I ' . ,,7 I 'E , linIn a ]..al~<<l_ .'-"'^iOtl"lW<>ttJaJ<llLSl)3lI.^8 NQIDIli>iSNO:J OOJ tON " 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ nhU ~ ~.: ~ " ~! . ,~~;~ II 'll .'!' i.! ~I~ ! I!I - ~ .e 5i ;:' m 'I' Eer. LS= ;ll en :i:i !,., im i ~~ ... I ~.i ... i >- i' ~ ~;! iNl1.llll 21 ~~"f.,. I * ... e' ~ U~$~I ! ~ . ~ ~ l!I!:~ ":e-'n~ Ed;!; :;~n~ ~~~ .." ~~ ." ~g ." 8~ ,. ~.~B ,ill II" 'i-j ~,i~ ., ~il: ;!l1l",i1i hEI' ;fH ~ii~~ !Iil; li:U mil .. - ~. ~ ~~ ~f ~I! II ~;~ ! i "~. . .. 5~ ,_, , I ~~ .....s ~mg ~!il1"'~o\t ..i :: ES I ~!!i ~.g, ;; =~~ii! f Ih'~, , !!j!;:i ~iiill! ~I~;~U i:::~2l)'~f6 :v ... 2' e'::: g: le . r::::: ~;:e._",.. sL , } ~ ~I ~i ~i ~I . . ~_..lljJ-. ti$1~~ ~=~ _lU'<<J1I~ll,~ iGl":DI1f'\V,\\,""",~" SNNNVU ""JlIn.l:JJJJ-DlIV'"1.IV"J9dNV1 -:;t.l~1'JN":I1V\O )NIS".j l"rX'lSS'V~')"^VULLlDi . 0 Oln w H HHn ...J "- Vi u ii' '" ~ '"I 1 I 1 I ~ ~ . I .; 1-1" !!!~ ~i ~,; "-. '" ~-\}~ - ---- - .--/ \ 1ER ~~~- \ c: '" R \N "'_ ---- - ,d .,. \)0. C'-~"" - ---- GUU:: 6L ----.~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 10 ----- \ \ '" \ '. " \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ " \ o > ...J co >-I\~ <( . 3: \~ ~I co, I , I I , I , I , I L. I!I.It '),I'1lUYM'iWD .rnms MiI1la 00ll Vd mIflL'Y:I.lJlDllV OEId N\llJ Jd\lJSON\ll YOIHO'ld 'H:<llYMHY:<l'lJ nA.IS nms ~JSSO.'"'' OP<'>!S. ~~l...n "'....~IOM") """="'.." NOIJ:''Jn,USNOJ <JO~ ION '0:: I~ 'W Is ,0 !;~ I~~ 'u.. Is ,e) 1:1: ,I- 16 ',J1) I , I , I , I =~==~~ I """"=-... I - -~- ~ - -- "-", ......-,,------- ==~ - -~JItIlr~ --"'''''_ --3^m(fAVM-~-==-~~:- - -==~-~ - _ i )f~Hf d ------------, - l ~ ~ o ex) o ,i; i;; , , ; ! . -- ~..:: _~~'lI.BU\"l ~:\V.,,-'(1Io'4~1IlI ~ "J~:Y.l.lJ-O#'JJ';I"Jl;(]NV1 ')N_Ilr.fJN~ltN:J ')NISUVLX1C,'SV,".NAVDl L1l~ . S1IV,LJO JdVJSONV1 lY1t 1d'mV.II1YlD l.'lifiIS MlI1Q 00ll Vd "irlIllDiIJ1lD)lV 01Sl1d nAlS llil15 !~ ~ ;~ H~ ~ i: ~ ~~ '" i S~. g~i ~:;;!~ i!! ~ ,. J ~ --' ~ ill C\ G z ~ .q <l'i --' ,. lL E w ill !l' ~~ ~~. U2 ~!i '" in ( Il")'"'~')'~~~') )NlOl....3"1:> ~ o ~ il ~ o ~ ~ , r . ~ S . . l.t911<IioflUdVl1J ~~; ill! ~------- VaIH01" 'HJ1VAlHVJ1J f,,(IU~;Xl1 LJ:rO~d ! f e ~ _~ ~l ~ ". I '~l:~, _l'~l ! H .~ ~ lip' ~.~ b . ~ ~ ~ &.. ~ i- 5.. .. a ~~ ~ ~ ri'$ 1: ~ ~ t ~ l ~ t ~ j ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : g i f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ j '. l ~i ~ K ~!! '! ~ ~ i &! ~ I I ~ ~l 1 ~ tH~imi!!}I!.ir~!j~di~ . ~ ,! !' .,. , . > I ~~Ii I , I u I ! U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !~ ~ ~ rll.! ! ~ 1 l? ~hJl l i ~ ~ Ii : "j: Ii __!. _ ~ ~.. ~ 2- ~k !! ~ ~ ~ ~~l:"'ii.! " j ~ ~ It Pc j ~ 8- , ,t., ...'! 0 l '., I ~ , 'i I L i, l' ~ ~~ ;; ~~-: ~ l ! l h!o> ~ 5 ~ ~.. :'! ~~ ~ ': ~ ~ I ", . ~ llf iI' . lr-! ~ , ! ., , .J J ~ t . i Ii ~ ~ i~; ~ ~ i i tPi ;I~ j ~ ~ i t ~l i i Ii j i , !l l' .,~ ~ ~ ~ ! 21!' I. i !! ~ I, I ~ ! i 1 ~~ ,} h~ i', ' I nl~ ; 'f ~ !. j =1 w I r 3 ! i ~ i i = H 1 - ~! ; ~ l' ~ t .~ t ! ~ ~ ;; I . &!! ' ~ ~ . l' ~ ~ II! j!, ~ . ~!'1 I, H. I" t~ ~., j I "" '. ,;! f 3~ i ~ 'il" h I'! j iii' ! ' & . ~l. !,; h' c!l ~ I h~ H i" j, '1,; E ~ . , 'i: i ~ ~.1 ~ &1 ~., !.'l~ h". .!.!t If I ~ ! ~ ilL2 ~! Fl,t }- H it i ~Hi h H ~ ; ~r ~l6~ ~ ~ ~ - ".1 ~ f '. . 'r !' I h,! .' j, e j.' l~ J' . , ~ ;~i ~? ~;:~_; .t:~-~ ~ ~irli i! :~ r ! i! h ~l ~ ~ "3 I ;l:; i li"l j ;i 11 ! ,hi \~;B i,' ~~ ~g i , . , ,'" 0 !i' '!l '3' In- ",'- . 19 c, 'I . c I~~i j ii! ~ i ",. f -", ,;" ;, !' g. l I! !I!' II I .c.!; 1-.1."'.' 8 0' 8' jEo, 'U ._ " ! _ " if; f' ,jp! a !' \' ~l!, .& _I ~, . ~,r Ii q , , if m r !~ tf~.:! Hi ~i a!H1 H Ii U I H !Hf ! ! ~!:L ~~t '4 ~ L F. _ _ __ ~ . ~ II ~ ~ r ~ g F' " r ~i ! 1 " ~ "j,' <Ii .. ~ 2' '" g i ~~ ~~ ~~ .1 -' <( ,- ill o <:l ?; ,- Z <ri <:( t--~ -' z Q L -' <l IL 'J ~ " i j lL - ~; Ii .. i ~;.1 i ~ ~ ! . ~H ,l i i ; 'ilL Q z>i I>.li i r, ~ _ ~ Jf i~ ~ ~g l L ! PHI H. [ Ii. i!. ]! ii !. i 1 , -. n ~ ~ 2'. j ;J ~ ~5 t u6 i! !l! !.ji II ; j! i Jl l~.. } i t~! :' t~ I ~ l} ,. ~- t & ~'6 ~t ~Q H ! .;: ~ ~ ~ij ! Ii ~ Ii ~ IHll!ni ~ '" '" .. o<i .a r ... :! ,~ 1~ r \ J u7~\\ ~~ ! e~!;! ~~ i ~~~i~~ "" ."~,, ~~ ~t~c'~ ~1 ~~.iI~ ~ ~ I c ! r ) ~ o ~ L 8-; ~ w z [ "~m ~'m ~~2H o'~H ~:~2:~ t ~i U i ~ I t ~''''A ,0i'I ~.-~ ~,~";f,;..."':'~ ..... NOUOlHSNOJ OOJ iON ~ ~ E --c-- n!i ex) ,,: . () ! ~ I ~ r , r.ll L ~o~' p~ !Ill ,; ~!'! H ~;;fi ;;: itP dH H H hit ~iii;l Ii i~H ~~~:~': i~ ~ HH ~:~~~ ~r ; !i ~ II!, L ! I! I ~ 1,.1" Ii B Ii ~ I!nm "I:} ~ ! ~ fg up Il~ .1, i'l "I. -tSi~ I ! " ~l H i 3 U ~ " .2 z () ;:: U ill ~ -' ~ cO ill . C\ ' II u <I lL '" ~ Z <I --' ~ ~;~7J <I r=l r"'"i Q' o ~ le >- f- Z ) o u Vl <I ~ ~ lei Z ~ (t f- Vl <I LJ Lf) LJ lJ L <I [t I f- D o Vl rJ\ r1J (t ~ l Vl z :3 o f- " z o f- U LJ Vl -. . ~~ i~ iC::; ~~ ;~ ~ ~0 - ~ ~~ ~ . Oe ~ "'Z' ~ ~: > . :::;'" w,.: II! I!!l!!,; :;~5 ~~~ ~~E , I!l;;:!,! 2 ....; ru M '" ...; ~ ~~j~~~c2c~:;~im2cl~o~~~",Q~~ 0 " t~ :~ ;i ~ ~!~ i; ii ~ i~ 0", ~ <>'a I-z ;.,~ "'1'5 i~ . i~ i I; i.l.!o. ... ,"= ~_!j_, ;,' ~=i FCe,'.~ec" e -oc _ c" ~~~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~; !u. ~n~ ~ni ~~ ~~ ~ ii ~I fJ,! ;; n ~I ~-~ C2:i? -,~ ~ ~ ~~ 18 ~ i'5!2 ". -. (""-.C ..~ > ; ~ g I ~ i . , ii ,I "I ~~ :e .ll~ !~ i!!1 i~F . <Xlu >- ,zl IY>-O(i>- <li-H<[lJ i=r-'I-IY> zJ<[lJlY ::t>OJ dJlJ(iVl f'Q JO lJl- 'I lI) _J n . :J <, )ill U u' ~c O. eC 0 ~~ lI) ,. <r ~g f- ),. lI) c 'rr <1 'w Z Dw "4 <r w) e" n< lI) 0~ <r gU ::: u w . . LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater., FL 33756 ATTN: Planning Department TO: DATE: September 22,2003 RE: Surf West 700 South Gulfview Clearwater Beach, FL WE TRANSMIT: (X) Herewith FOR YOUR: () Approval () Information () Record THE FOllOWING: () Prints () Specifications () Change Order () Submittals ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Under separate cover Distribution to parties Review and comment Use Shop drawing prints/reproducibles Samples Product literature Other COPIES 1 1 1 12 Copies 1 Set 13 DESCRIPTION DATE Flexible Development Application. Application Fee Check ($1,205.00). Original Survey. Survey. 8 % x 11 Reproducible's. Site Plan, Exterior Elevation and Civil Engineering. REMARKS: Should you have any questions, Please feel free to call. tZl~1 Alex Plisko, AlA Plisko Architecture, P.A. Clearwater, FL 33755 (727) 461-0030 Florida Architects Corporation No. AA C000813 C:\!SDI T ranSmittal\SurfWest700-CityofCL W-922.wpd . -l :T 000 al "0 "0 o. !a c,- :J ~ '"0 ~ (!) 0- CD Ci3;l :S. 00. ~ 00. CD al ~Ci3 :Jo-l a. 91. ::I: -<"0_ o-en c::0'- ::e..,en -.al Z =:JO gal-l :J :g )> o="tl =gm :::!l_:;tI ~ 00 ~ :J-I al 0' . - .., o al 9'"0 CD CD o 3 S,.;::+ O. o 3 CD S. 9' CD al "0 "'Q. &3" - o. :J o ...., - '"d ~ '< ~ = ... 1-3 o ... ~ . (j ::r' (!) n i>I" lZi e ~ ~ tT'l lZi ...., N VJ .j::. -....) ...... i:l "'1:i (!) ., en o = ~ ~ =- o Co "'CI ~ '< fll ., = ~ = II':' Z o > f'> f'> o = = .... z o (j = = ::I ., a z = == o ~ ~ f'> fll =t fll Co "'1:i ~ '< ~ = ... ~ t"" S' fll .... .... fll a 0-3 o .... ~ '"rj t""' t:l N o o VJ I o \0 o .j::. VI t"" S' fll .... .... (j fll a> a ~ ~ z o ::0 ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ...... =I:t: t:l = ~ ;-N .. 0 QO \CW ~O NO --0 NO Qo ~O o o o o \0 (II .....:J W > > - {A ~ (A ~ N .... - .... - N \0 (") ~ "tv = ~ "tv = -- ~ 0- N " Q 0 = Q 0 = N N (") .... .... " Ul VI Ul VI -- 'So b 0 "'CI b 0 "'CI -....) N a> a> "'1:i 0 ~ Q 0 s: Q 0 s: ~ 0 VJ o .j::. 0-3 ;! = (j o Co fll '"rj t::l ~ fll X ~ 0.: ., (b -a (j c' o = ~ ., n Pio - o - o I VJ .j::. - N 0- N ~ ~ fll = ~ > f'> f'> I! a z = CLWCoverSheet . . FLD2003-09045 700 S GULFVIEW BLVD Date Received: 09/22/2003 SURF STYLE ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 285A . ,~f]7llr~ ~~(~. ~LOF rlt!';;~ ~~ \. ';;'f~-"", e;;y '-"'. 4~~).,.l .~~~~ ~~~,)I/ ~~ ~ ~" - ~ ~ "i~.~ --=- ~.~ ~~~. ~ ~~ ""I>A';.~ -==- ~~ 'a,y..rll~~- >'~.~ ~r$:~rft(l~~~\'t "'&-"":;..4':llTE~,,.,~.~ ~~nfl CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW December 18, 2003 Mr. Alex Plisko Plisko Architecture, P A 800 Drew Street Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-09045 -700 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Plisko: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 16, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to four feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to two feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (36 spaces) to 3.19 spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces) and a reduction in the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five feet to two feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER @ Bll.LJONSON, COMMISSIOt\ER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" December 18, 2003 Plisko - Page Two Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any building permit; 3. That an agreement with the abutting property owner for joint use of the dumpster on the adjacent property is required, acceptable to the Solid Waste Department, prior to the issuance of any building permits; 4. That, in lieu of stormwater attenuation, payment be made to the City, in an amount determined by the City, prior the issuance of any building permits; 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontages be completed prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy; 6. That signage meet the requirements of Code and a Comprehensive Sign Program be processed for more than one attached sign. Any freestanding signage shall be limited to monument-style, not to exceed six feet in height designed to match the color and material of the building; and 7. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, the landscape plan be revised to change the Natal palm shrubs to a suitable plant, acceptable to the Planning Department. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (December 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 1, 2004 (14 days from the date of this Development Order). r December 18, 2003 Plisko - Page Three If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727- 562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myc1earwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, . ~~ Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning Director I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFLEX1Pending cases I Up for the next CDBIGulfview 700 Surf Style (T)IGulfview 700 Development Order. doc . . PLANNING AND DEVELOMENT SERVICES 100 SO. MYRTLE AVE., 2ND FLOOR, CLEARWATER, FL 33756 PHONE: 562-4567; FAX: 562-4576 INSPECTION LINE: 562-4580 DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE KNOW OF ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Clearwater pertaining to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the undersigned, being the fee owner (s) of the following described real property situated in the City of Clearwater, County of Pin ell as and State of Florida, to wit: See..- E~h '/\'. do hereby make the following declaration of conditions, limitations and restrictions on said lands, hereafter to be known and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE, as to the following particulars: 1. That the aforesaid plot or combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions thereof, shall hereafter be regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an indivisible building site. 2. That the said property shall henceforth be considered as one plot or parcel of land, and that no portion thereof shall be sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or devised separately except in its entirety, as one plot or parcel ofland. 3. That this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run with the land, as provided by law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned, and all parties claiming under them until such time as the same may be released in writing under the order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agree(s) that this instrument shall be recorded in the public records of Pin ell as County, Florida. Signed, sealed, witnessed and acknowledged this ~ ~, at Clearwater, Florida. /O'~ day of /)acemb~1'" ~ ~ OWNER(S): ~~/"'jP rt~~~G:2~ STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME personally appeared CllQS /lnos-/tis.j) fJOl~/oJ and , to me ~ to be the person(s) described in execution thereof to be his, her or their free act and deed for the uses and purpose herein mentioned. Il WITNESS my hand and official seal this / J'.b.. day of Vb .JZ/I~4~/L-- fidM3 ~~~r-- My Commission Expires: ""~""'" Patricia J. Ceelol1 litA.....!Pt.\ Commission # 00902313 :~\ l~: Expires Feb, 15,. .:tOM ~"::~4' ~~ Bonded 'l'hru "",Off"",'" Atlantic BblidiJ1g Co., lile. I,,,, KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA INST# 2003526139 12/23/2003 at 03:58 PM OFF REC BK: 13266 PG: 2435-2436 DocType:AGM RECORDING: $10.50 . . Exhibit "A" Parcel I: (17/29/15/05076/003/0110) Lots 11 and 12 in Block C, BA YSIDE SHORES, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 58, Pages 12 and 13, Public Records of Pin ell as County, Florida; Parcel II: (17/29/15/05040/005/0130) Lot 13 in Block E, Bayside Subdivision No.6, Unit B, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 55, Pages 17 and 18, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; Together with that part of the North 15.0 feet of South Gulfview Boulevard (now vacated) abutting Lot 13 of Parcel II on the South. . . LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: DATE: December 10, 2003 City of Clearwater Planning Department Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 A TTN: Wayne Wells Senior Planner RE: WE TRANSMIT: (X) Herewith FOR YOUR: () Approval () Information () Record THE FOllOWING: () Prints () Specifications () Change Order () Submittals ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Flexible Development Case Case FLD 2003-09045 700 Gulfview Blvd. Under separate cover Distribution to parties Review and comment Use Shop drawing prints/reproducibles Samples Product literature Other COPIES 1 DATE DESCRIPTION 12-2-03 Declaration of Unity of Title. REMARKS: /(/) ~V~~ Alex Plisko, AlA ;' Plisko Architecture, P.A. Clearwater, FL 33755 (727) 461-0030 Florida Architects Corporation No. AA C000813 C :I! SDI TransmittaIISurfStyle#12-KZ 1209.wpd ....... ~. '_ _ ~ "',".' _., '.,....... ~. '"'l. .'-.1 :.' ,. .. . DEe 1 0 2003 ~ I FAne-52! First A&ican Title Insuranc'e CApany SCHEDULE A Agent's File No.: 01-4314-1 Policy No. FA-35-626200 Date of Policy: June 29, 2001 04:50:00 PM Amount of Insurance $ 1, 00 0 , 000 . 00 1. Name of Insured: Elias Anastopoulos 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: Elias Anastopoulos 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: Parcel I: (17/29/15/05076/003/0110) Lots 11 and 12, Block C, BAYSIDE SHORES, acording to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 58, Page(s) 12 and 13, Public Records of pinellas County, Florida. Parcel II: (17/29/15/05040/005/0130) Lot 13, Block E, Bayside Subdivision No.6, Unit B, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 55, Pages 17 and 18, Public Records of Pine1las County, Florida. Together with that part of the North 15.0 feet of South Gu1fview Boulevard (now vacated) abutting Lot 13 of Parcel II on the South. By: " . . . -s'~cnr~ ~~i'~~~F rN~~ ~~~:C~~\ "..='_r\~ c::c.~ ... . -= ,.....~ ..~ ~ -::=- :--II~ t~:~ -- . ~~ -"'~~~~'-dl~~C\ ......~~~Jll\."... CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PIANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 December 18, 2003 Mr. Alex Plisko Plisko Architecture, P A 800 Drew Street Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-09045 - 700 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Plisko: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 16,2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to four feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to two feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to rubber matting), reductions ofthe side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (36 spaces) to 3.19 spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces) and a reduction in the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five feet to two feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIIJBARD, COMMISSIONER * BUJ.]ONSON, COMMISSIOKER "EQUAl. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" .f' . . December 18, 2003 Plisko - Page Two Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any building permit; 3. That an agreement with the abutting property owner for joint use of the dumpster on the adjacent property is required, acceptable to the Solid Waste Department, prior to the issuance of any building permits; 4. That, in lieu of stormwater attenuation, payment be made to the City, in an amount determined by the City, prior the issuance of any building permits; 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontages be completed prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy; 6. That signage meet the requirements of Code and a Comprehensive Sign Program be processed for more than one attached sign. Any freestanding signage shall be limited to monument-style, not to exceed six feet in height designed to match the color and material of the building; and 7. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, the landscape plan be revised to change the Natal palm shrubs to a suitable plant, acceptable to the Planning Department. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (December 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy ofthis letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 1, 2004 (14 days from the date of this Development Order). L ..,. . . December 18,2003 Plisko - Page Three If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727- 562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.mvc1earwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, . ~~ Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning Director \ IMS5cIPDS\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending cases \ Up for the next CDBIGulfview 700 Surf Style (7) I Gulfview 700 Development Order. doc . l e . >- City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue, 33756 P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater Florida 33758-4748 o u Fax To: Mr. Alex Pliska From: Wayne Wells 562-4504 Pages: 8 Fax: 447-6914 Re: Staff Recommendation Date: 12/12/2003 CC: Phone 442-7200 o Urgent 1RI For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle . Comments: Attached staff recommendation re: FLD2003-09045 - 700 S. Gulfview Boulevard Community Development Board Meeting date: Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 2:00pm .. t ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 12/12/2003 16:27 NAME PLAN FAX 7275624576 TEL 7275624557 DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURA TI O~~ PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 12/12 15:22 94475914 00:04:51 08 OK STANDARD ECM . . ..~~~~ l~,'1~~~ ~.~. ~.!";~,/, ~. ~~. '. ~C":I:- ---c- !!IflJirl <(loi ~r::~=:=::.-=- ~~ -~ =-.,:,= ~/lt ,..~ -- j'~," ":...a'IA'; 'IJP...t~~~ ~~4TE~ ~... ~-I.n';'" CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW December 1, 2003 Mr. Alex Plisko Plisko Architecture, P A 800 Drew Street Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (FLD2003-09045) Dear Mr. P1isko: The Flexible Development application (Case No. FLD2003-09045) to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to four feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to two feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (38 spaces) to 3.19 spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces) and a reduction in the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five feet to two feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C for property located at 700 South Gulfview Boulevard has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on December 16, 2003. The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, 6(:;1: ~s: f!c~ Senior Planner \IMS5c1PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending cases I Up for the next CDBIGulfview 700 Surf Style (1)IGulfview 700 CDS Letter.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYr HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BiLl. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . Pliska Architecture, P.A., AlA Alex Pliska, Jr., AlA, NCARB NOV 0 6 2003 November 5, 2003 Wayne M. Wells, AICP Senior Planner City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5502 RE: Surf-Style #12 Clearwater Beach Dear Mr. Wells: In reference to your faxed comments of October 24, 2003 regarding the October 23, 2003 DRC meeting for Surf Style #12, please find our response attached. DRAFT DRC COMMENTS FOR OCTOBER 23,2003: 4:30 p.m. Case:FLD2003-09045 - 700 S. Gulfview Boulevard Owner/Applicant: Mr. Elias Anastaopoulas Representative: Mr. Alex Plisko, Plisko Architecture, PA (800 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone (727) 442-7200; fax (727)447-6914; e-mail: archD{a)verizon.net) Location: .051 acre located on the north side of Gulfview Boulevard at the intersection of Parkway Drive. Atlas Page: 285A Zoning: T, Tourist District. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from IS feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), reduction of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 1.92 feet (to building) and from IS feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to rubber matting), reductions on the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavemem) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting). a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (36 spaces) to 3.13 spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces), a reduction of interior landscaped area from 10 percent to three percent of the vehicular use area and a reduction of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building, as part of a Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Proposed use: A 7,610 square foot retail sales and services building. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Civic Association (Pres. Mr. David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave., Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: (727) 446-5801; e-mail: dmacnav{a)att.net). Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AlCP, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Duane Anderson and Scott Rice. C:\!SDlLetters\Surfwest12wWells 115. wpd BOO Drew Street Clearwater, Florida 33755-4516 727-461-0030 727-442-7200 Fax 727-447-6914 Florida Architect Corporation license Number M COOOB13 email aparchitect@aol.com . . Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Surf Style 12 November 5, 2003 Page 2 of5 Comment 1: Stormwater: a) Proposed water quality pond must draw down within 24 hrs. Provide calculations demonstrating this prior to building permits. b) Indicate minimum side slopes (4:1) for the proposed pond. c) Payment in-lieu of stormwater attenuation will be accepted in the amount of $31 ,974. Form will be provided at DRC mtg. Form must be signed prior to CDB. Payment must be made prior to any building permits being issued. Response 1: Stormwater: a) Currently having PERC test done. b) Refer to Civil Drawing C-7.0 c) Applicant agrees to payment. Comment 2: General Engineering: a) Brick pavers are not permitted as a public sidewalk. b) Why not use the existing sanitary sewer "wye" to avoid and open cut through street? (Before the City approves the proposed sanitary sewer connection the road condition must be demonstrated.) Response 2: General Engineering: a) Eliminated brick pavers, refer to Site Plan A-I. b) Existing "wye" will be used. Refer to Civil Drawings. Comment 3: Planning: a) Revise the description of the request to identify all of the request as outlined at the beginning of this letter, specifically the landscape reductions, and revise the responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to ensure that the responses include justification for the additional request. b) Show interior landscape areas hatched or shaded and labeled. Discuss with Arden Dittmer the landscape areas that may be counted as "interior landscape areas." Recalculate interior landscape square footage and percentage of the vehicular use area, as this may reduce or eliminate the requested reduction (10% required; 3% presently proposed). c) A Unity of Title document will be required to be recorded in the public record prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. d) A double dumpster enclosure is proposed on the adjacent property to the C:\!SDlLetters\SurfwestI2wWellsI15.wpd . e Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Surf Style 12 November 5, 2003 Page 3 of5 east. It is unknown how this area is developed today and whether there will be any proposed reduction in parking to accommodate the dumpster enclosure. Advise. e) The survey indicates the existence of overhead power and communication lines adjacent to this property within the rights-of-way. Code provides in Section 3-911 that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable." Undergrounding the existing overhead power lines and communication lines within the rights- or-way, or at least providing conduits along the street frontages for future undergrounding, may be a requirement of this proposal. Advise/address. f) Provide the existing and proposed Floor Area Ratio and Impervious Surface Ratio on Sheet C4.0. g) Based on the submitted survey, show all appropriate sheets the 10- foot wide utility easement along a portion of the Gulfview Boulevard frontage. h) Address outdoor lighting. i) Provide the proposed colors of the building (color samples), including the glass. j) Provide a statement that all existing signage will be/has been removed. Proposed signage will need to be processed as a Comprehensive Sign program, since there are two attached signs. Signage must be architecturally integrated into design of the building. k) Additional landscaping for vertical relief may be required within the stormwater retention basin adjacent to South Gulfview Boulevard. Response 3: Planning: a) Application has been revised. b) Refer to Sheet A-2.2 for calculations. c) We will file Unity of Title prior to building permits. d) Existing dumpster will be shared. e) All on site utilities will be underground. Power poles will require relocation on Parkway Drive. If impractical, lines will be routed underground. f) Refer to Sheet C4.0. g) Has been added to all plans. h) 30' high single pole lights, refer to attached photo and Sheets A-2.1 & A-3. i) Colors of building and concrete tiles has been delivered to Wayne Wells and colors are indicated on the Exterior Elevations Sheet A-3. Window frames will be white with clear glass. C:\!SD\Letters\SurfwestI2wWells I 15.wpd . e Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Surf Style 12 November 5, 2003 Page 4 of5 j) Existing signage will be removed and is noted on Exterior Elevations Sheet A-3. Note also states applicant will make a Comprehensive Sign program application for new signage. k) The stormwater retention pond is for treatment and is to small to add additional landscaping. Comment 4: Solid Waste: a) Show shared double enclosure. Only one there now. Enclosure doesn't allow truck access. Need to relocated proposed double enclosure. Double enclosure detail needs to be shown on detail sheet. Alternative is to provide an on-site dumpster enclosure. Response 4: Solid Waste: a) Proposed project will share the single existing dumpster as noted on Site Plan Sheet A-2.1 The Surf Style has two other stores on Clearwater beach. Products will be delivered to the other stores and packaging will be discarded in those dumpsters. Comment 5: Landscaping: a) The Plaza adjacent has an approved landscape plan, suggest match plant materials to create a uniform look. b) Suggest R.O.W. permit to allow landscaping in the area as designed with the plaza on the adjacent plaza. c) Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation planting shall be provide for 100% of a building facade with frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of a least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. Staff may not support proposed reduction. d) Driveway entrance change along South Gulfview adjust the landscape plan for the plaza, that plan will need to be modified to show the changes; and Submit revised plan for review. Response 5: Landscaping: a) Landscaping has been revised to include similar design along Gulfview Boulevard. b) There is no plan to landscape the right-of-way at this time. C:\!SD\Letters\SurfwestI2wWellsI15.wpd . . Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Surf Style 12 November 5, 2003 Page 5 of5 c) Foundation Planting had been added along South & West side of the building and a reduction from 5 feet to 2 feet in width has been requested for the South and West sides. d) Landscaping plan has been modified per plaza plan and will be installed by Surf Style. Comment Notes: Resubmit 15 collated copes of the revised plans and application material addressing all above departments' comments by Thursday, November 6,2003, no later than noon. Response Notes: We will submit fifteen (15) collated copies of revised plans and application materials to accompany this letter. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions or concerns Sincerely, 6(?~~ Alex Plisko, Jr. AIA AP/dew Encl. C:\!SD\Letters\SurfwestI2wWells 115.wpd . . LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Wayne M. Wells, AICP Senior Planner City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5502 DATE: November 6,2003 ATTN: Wayne M. Wells, AICP RE: Case: FLD2003-09045 Surf Style #12 WE TRANSMIT: (X) Herewith FOR YOUR: () Approval () Information () Record THE FOLLOWING: () Prints () Specifications () Change Order () Submittals ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Under separate cover Distribution to parties Review and comment Use Shop drawing prints/reproducibles Samples Product literature Other COPIES 1 15 15 15 15 1 DATE 11/5/03 DESCRIPTION Letter Responding to October 23, 2003 DRC Comments Applications Attachment B Sets of Drawings Survey Set of 8 1/2" x 11" REMARKS: ~~'1 Alex Plisko, AlA Plisko Architecture, P.A. Clearwater, FL 33755 (727) 461-0030 Florida Architects Corporation No. AA C000813 C:\ISDITransmHlaIISurfStyle#12wWells-1106.wpd NOV 0 6 2003 LL . I o >- r- - U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: A~Q.~ ~h~k_L~-,\h 7 _j&~ FAX: ". +~I- ~~ 14: / 7'13" ~ 'OSS ( Phone: +-L\z.. - 71-0-0 / 71 '3> .. , B B ~ ( FROM: WCkM ~ \J~\ li DATE:,-- Jll ~\ 03 Phone:~ \0 2.. - 4-- -S- t)4 . MESSAGE: RE: FL.P 2,..t)o~ - 0 'J) tS 7 01) ~. ~ ~\~\LW ?)..~. Fi ~\ \)~~ G,......~~ NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 3 ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 10/31/2003 14:48 NAME PLAN FAX 7275524575 TEL 7275524557 DATE, TIME FAX t'-lO. INAME DURA TI ON PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 10/31 14:45 94475914 00:01:45 03 OK STANDARD ECM ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 10/31/2003 14:51 NAME PLAN FAX 7275524575 TEL 7275524557 DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURA TI ON PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 10/31 14:49 97939855 00:01:45 03 OK STANDARD ECM f' 4:30 p.m. . . Case: FLD2003-09045 - 700 S. Gulfview Boulevard Owner/Applicant: Mr. Elias Anastasopoulas. Representative: Mr. Alex Plisko, Plisko Architecture, PA (800 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: (727) 442-7200; fax: (727) 447-6914; email: archp@verizon.net). Location: 0.51 acre located on the north side of Gulfview Boulevard at the intersection with Parkway Drive. Atlas Page: 285A. Zoning: T, Tourist District. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 1.92 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (38 spaces) to 3.13 spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces), a reduction of interior landscaped area from 10 percent to three percent of the vehicular use area and a reduction of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Proposed Use: A 7,610 square-foot retail sales and services building. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Civic Association (Pres. Mr. David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave., Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; e-mail: dmacnav(@.att.net). Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Wayne Wells, Duanne Anderson and Scott Rice. Applicant/Representative: Alex Plisko, Danny, and Keith Sacs The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation: a) No comments. 2. Stormwater: a) Proposed water quality pond must draw down within 24hrs. Provide calculations demonstrating this prior to building permits. b) Indicate minimum side slopes (4: 1) for the proposed pond. c) Payment in-lieu of stormwater attenuation will be accepted in the amount of $31,974. Form will be provided at DRC mtg. Form must be signed prior to CDB. Payment must be made prior to any building permits being issued. 3. Traffic En!!:ineerin!!:: a) No comments. 4. General En!!:ineerin!!:: a) Brick pavers are not permitted as a public sidewalk. b) Why not use the existing sanitary sewer "wye" to avoid an open cut through street? (Before the City approves the proposed sanitary sewer connection the road condition must be demonstrated. ) 5. Plannin!!:: a) Revise the description of the request to identify all of the requests as outlined at the beginning of this letter, specifically the landscape reductions, and revise the responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to ensure that the responses include justification for these additional requests. b) Show interior landscape areas hatched or shaded and labeled. Discuss with Arden Dittmer the landscape areas that may be counted as "interior landscape areas." Recalculate interior landscape square footage and percentage of the vehicular use area, as this may reduce or eliminate the requested reduction (10% required; 3% presently proposed). c) A Unity of Title document will be required to be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. d) A double dumpster enclosure is proposed on the adjacent property to the east. It is unknown how this area is developed today and whether there will be any proposed reduction in parking to accommodate the dumpster enclosure. Advise. e) The survey indicates the existence of overhead power and communication lines adjacent to this property within the rights-of-way. Code provides in Section 3-911 that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be Page 1 of2 \ 6. undergro.unless such undergrounding is not practica. Undergrounding the existing overhead power lines and communication lines within the rights-of-way, or at least providing conduits along the street frontages for future undergrounding, may be a requirement of this proposal. Advise/address. t) Provide the existing and proposed Floor Area Ratio and Impervious Surface Ratio on Sheet C4.0. g) Based on the submitted survey, show on all appropriate sheets the 10-foot wide utility easement along a portion of the Gulfview Boulevard frontage. h) Address outdoor lighting. i) Provide the proposed colors of the building (color samples), including the glass. j) Provide a statement that all existing signage will be/has been removed. Proposed signage will need to be processed as a Comprehensive Sign program, since there are two attached signs. Signage must be architecturally integrated into design of the building. k) Additional landscaping for vertical relief may be required within the stormwater retention basin adjacent to South Gulfview Boulevard. Solid Waste: a) Shows shared double enclosure. Only one there now. Enclosure doesn't allow truck access. Need to relocate proposed double enclosure. Double enclosure detail needs to be shown on detail sheet. Alternative is to provide an on-site dumpster enclosure. Land Resources: a) No comments. Fire: a) No comments. Environmental: a) No comments. Community Response: a) No comment. Landscapin2: a) The Plaza adjacent has an approved landscape plan, suggest matching plant materials to create a uniform look. (Planning Department to try to fmd plan). b) Suggest R.O.W. permit to allow landscaping in the area as designed with the plaza on the adjacent plaza. (Planning Department to try to find plan). c) Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. Staff may not support proposed reduction. ~--" d) Driveway entrance change along South Gulfview adjusts the landscape plan for the plaza, that plan will need to be modified to show the changes; and Submit revised plan for review. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. NOTES: Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans and application material addressing all above departments' comments by Thursday, November 6, 2003, no later than noon. I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending cases I Up for the next DRClGulfview 700 Surf StylelFinal DRC Comments 10.30.03.doc Page 2 of2 LL . . o >- I- - () FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: A\~)(. P\,s ~. FAX: +bri. \0 9 L1- Phone: ++1-- 72..00 FROM: \rJ~\-JL ~o.\\~ Phone:~ ,,2..- 4S~4 ~ \ - DATE:~ Jj) 1~ {):> RE:_fL\) G...tl:OJ - 0 ~ Q4S 7 () 0 ~,,\ tv', L-w SloJ 4- MESSAGE: 1)\LAPr T)~c.. ~,^-~-1-~ NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) .3 RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 10/24/2003 13:20 NAME PLAt'l FAX 7275524575 TEL 7275524557 DATE, TIME FAX NO.INAME DURA TI ON PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 10/24 13: 18 94475914 00:01:43 03 OK STANDARD ECM 4:30 p.m. . . Case: FLD2003-09045 - 700 S. Gulfview Boulevard Owner/Applicant: Mr. Elias Anastasopoulas. Representative: Mr. Alex Plisko, Plisko Architecture, PA (800 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: (727) 442-7200; fax: (727) 447-6914; email: archp(mverizon.net). Location: 0.51 acre located on the north side of Gulfview Boulevard at the intersection with Parkway Drive. Atlas Page: 285A. Zoning: T, Tourist District. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 1.92 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (38 spaces) to 3.13 spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces), a reduction of interior landscaped area from 10 percent to three percent of the vehicular use area and a reduction of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Proposed Use: A 7,610 square-foot retail sales and services building. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Civic Association (Pres. Mr. David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave., Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; e-mail: dmacnav@att.net). Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Wayne Wells, Duanne Anderson and Scott Rice. Applicant/Representative: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation: a) No comments. 2. Stormwater: a) Proposed water quality pond must draw down within 24hrs. Provide calculations demonstrating this prior to building permits. b) Indicate minimum side slopes (4:1) for the proposed pond. c) Payment in-lieu of stormwater attenuation will be accepted in the amount of $31,974. Form will be provided at DRC mtg. Form must be signed prior to CDB. Payment must be made prior to any building permits being issued. 3. Traffic Ene:ineerine:: a) No comments. 4. General Ene:ineerine:: a) Brick pavers are not permitted as a public sidewalk. b) Why not use the existing sanitary sewer "wye" to avoid an open cut through street? (Before the City approves the proposed sanitary sewer connection the road condition must be demonstrated. ) 5. Plannine:: a) Revise the description of the request to identify all of the requests as outlined at the beginning of this letter, specifically the landscape reductions, and revise the responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to ensure that the responses include justification for these additional requests. b) Show interior landscape areas hatched or shaded and labeled. Discuss with Arden Dittmer the landscape areas that may be counted as "interior landscape areas." Recalculate interior landscape square footage and percentage of the vehicular use area, as this may reduce or eliminate the requested reduction (10% required; 3% presently proposed). c) A Unity of Title document will be required to be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. d) A double dumpster enclosure is proposed on the adjacent property to the east. It is unknown how this area is developed today and whether there will be any proposed reduction in parking to accommodate the dumpster enclosure. Advise. e) The survey indicates the existence of overhead power and communication lines adjacent to this property within the rights-of-way. Code provides in Section 3-911 that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be FLD2003-09045 - Page 1 of 2 undergro.unless such undergrounding is not practica. Undergrounding the existing overhead power lines and communication lines within the rights-of-way, or at least providing conduits along the street frontages for future undergrounding, may be a requirement of this proposal. Advise/address. f) Provide the existing and proposed Floor Area Ratio and Impervious Surface Ratio on Sheet C4.0. g) Based on the submitted survey, show on all appropriate sheets the lO-foot wide utility easement along a portion of the Gulfview Boulevard frontage. h) Address outdoor lighting. i) Provide the proposed colors of the building (color samples), including the glass. j) Provide a statement that all existing signage will be!has been removed. Proposed signage will need to be processed as a Comprehensive Sign program, since there are two attached signs. Signage must be architecturally integrated into design of the building. k) Additional landscaping for vertical relief may be required within the stormwater retention basin adjacent to South Gulfview Boulevard. 6. Solid Waste: a) Shows shared double enclosure. Only one there now. Enclosure doesn't allow truck access. Need to relocate proposed double enclosure. Double enclosure detail needs to be shown on detail sheet. Alternative is to provide an on-site dumpster enclosure. 7. Land Resources: a) No comments. 8. Fire: a) No comments. 9. Environmental: a) No comments. 10. Community Response: a) No comment. 11. Landscapin!!: a) The Plaza adjacent has an approved landscape plan, suggest matching plant materials to create a uniform look. b) Suggest R.O.W. permit to allow landscaping in the area as designed with the plaza on the adjacent plaza. c) Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. Staff may not support proposed reduction. d) Driveway entrance change along South Gulfview adjusts the landscape plan for the plaza, that plan will need to be modified to show the changes; and Submit revised plan for review. NOTES: Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans and application material addressing all above departments' comments by Thursday, November 6, 2003, no later than noon. FLD2003-09045 - Page 2 of 2 I ~ , . . CITY OF CLEARWATER LoNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTI.E AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 October 15,2003 Mr. Alex Plisko Plisko Architecture, P A 800 Drew Street Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 1.92 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (38 spaces) to 3.13 spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces), a reduction of interior landscaped area from 10 percent to three percent of the vehicular use area and a reduction of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, at 700 Gulfview Boulevard (Case FLD2003-09045). Dear Mr. Plisko: The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 1.92 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (38 spaces) to 3.13 spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces), a reduction of interior landscaped area from 10 percent to three percent of the vehicular use area and a reduction of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, at 700 Gulfview Boulevard (Case FLD2003-09045). After a preliminary review of the resubmitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. While not part of a completeness review, I have provided preliminary information about the sufficiency of the application. More comments will be provided by the Development Review Committee (DRC) prior to or at the DRC meeting. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" .... . . . October 15, 2003 Plisko - Page 2 General Comments related to the sufficiency of the application: 1. Revise the description of the request to identify all of the requests as outlined at the beginning of this letter, specifically the landscape reductions, and revise the responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to ensure that the responses include justification for these additional requests. 2. Show interior landscape areas hatched or shaded and labeled. 3. A Unity of Title document will be required to be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. 4. A double dumpster enclosure is proposed on the adjacent property to the east. It is unknown how this area is developed today and whether there will be any proposed reduction in parking to accommodate the dumpster enclosure. Advise. 5. The survey indicates the existence of overhead power and communication lines adjacent to this property within the rights-of-way. Code provides in Section 3-911 that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable." Undergrounding the existing overhead power lines and communication lines within the rights-of-way, or at least providing conduits along the street frontages for future undergrounding, may be a requirement of this proposal. Advise/address. 6. Provide the existing and proposed Floor Area Ratio and Impervious Surface Ratio on Sheet C4.0. 7. Based on the submitted survey, show on all appropriate sheets the to-foot wide utility easement along a portion of the Gulfview Boulevard frontage. 8. Address outdoor lighting. 9. Provide the proposed colors of the building (color samples), including the glass. 10. Provide a statement that all existing signage will be!has been removed. Proposed signage will need to be processed as a Comprehensive Sign program, since there are two attached SIgnS. 11. Additional landscaping for vertical relief may be required within the stormwater retention basin adj acent to South Gulfview Boulevard. Any responses to the above comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional comments will be provided at the DRC meeting. The above comments and comments you will receive at the DRC meeting must be addressed and revised documents submitted to the Planning Department by noon on November 6, 2003 (15 copies of all submittals). The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on October 30, 2003, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus at 562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or a representative must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. I " . . October 15, 2003 Plisko - Page 3 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.c1earwater-fl.com. *Make us your favorite! Sincerely, WrJA.;,..i, M. Wbfl1 w a~ M. Wells, AICP Senior Planner I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXiPending cases\Up for the next DRClGulfview 700 Surf Style I Gulfview 700 Complete Letter JO.15.03.doc . . . It CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LoNG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REviEW September 29,2003 Mr. Alex Plisko Plisko Architecture, P A 800 Drew Street Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 1.92 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to one foot (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting) and a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (38 spaces) to three spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, at 700 Gulfview Boulevard (Case FLD2003-09045). Dear Mr. Plisko: The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 1.92 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to one foot (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting) and a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (38 spaces) to three spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, at 700 Gulfview Boulevard. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, Staff shall specify the deficiencies of the application. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. In order to be scheduled for the October 30. 2003. Development Review Committee (DRC). a complete application with all required information and drawings must be submitted (one original plus 12 copies) bv 9 am on Monday. October 6.2003. Alternately, if a complete application not possible by October 6, 2003, the next deadline for submission is noon on Thursday, October 23,2003. BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BlI.L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ~ND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . .. . . September 29,2003 Plisko - Page 2 The following items and/or information are required in order to make your application complete: 1. The number of required parking spaces is proposed to be reduced from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (38 spaces) to three spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces). A parking study must be submitted to justify the reduction requested. The parameters of the parking study must be approved by the City prior to the study being conducted. Please contact Frank Gerlock at 727-562-4557 to discuss the study parameters. 2. Revise the site data on Sheet C3.0 to: J a. Provide "existing," "proposed" and "required" site data. Since the building has apparently been recently tom down, it is suggested to provide the site data prior to the building demolition; and @ Provide "interior landscape coverage" in square feet and in the percentage of the vehicular use area; show interior landscape areas hatched or shaded and labeled; ,-- J1. J 2. o 0) (i) While not part of a completeness review, I have provided preliminary information about the sufficiency of the applications. The following information may be submitted as part of the submission to make the application complete on October 6, 2003. More comments will be provided by the DRC once the applications are deemed complete. General Comments related to the sufficiency of the application: Revise the description of the request to identify all of the requests as outlined at the beginning of this letter. Also revise the responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to ensure that the responses include justification of all of the requests. Suggestion: Do not repeat back the verbiage of the criteria as the response; rather, state how (what, why, when, etc.) you are in compliance with the criteria. As part of the response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria for designing to Beach By Design design guidelines, state how the proposal meets the design guidelines. A Unity of Title document will be required to be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. A double dumpster enclosure is proposed on the adjacent property to the east. It is unknown how this area is developed today and whether there will be any proposed reduction in parking to accommodate the dumpster enclosure. Advise. The survey indicates the existence of overhead power and communication lines adjacent to this property within the rights-of-way. Code provides in Section 3-911 that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable." Undergrounding the existing overhead power lines and communication lines within the rights-of-way, or at least providing conduits along the street frontages for future undergrounding, may be a requirement of this proposal. Advise/address. :A .. J6. J 7. /8. @ )10. Ill. J~ J 14. /15. ~ . . September 29,2003 Plisko - Page 3 The landscape plan Sheet C8.0 must show landscaping of the increased terminal island on the adjacent property at the joint driveway to the south. Revise the site data on Sheet C3.0 to: 'a. Show the existing zoning to be "Commercial" (not "CG"); Jb. Revise "developed use" to "proposed use;" J c. Revise "building setbacks" to conform to City of Clearwater setback requirements (i.e.: setbacks are measured not only to vertical structures, but also to pavement; you may present setbacks to proposed pavement and to the proposed building); 'd. Provide required parking calculations based on five spaces per 1,000 square feet (not four); , e. Revise proposed building height to that which is actually proposed; / f. Revise the building coverage to that of only the first floor (mezzanine is covering the same footprint); and J g. Include the mezzanine in the "proposed gross floor area;" Provide setback dimensions from property lines to structures (building, pavement/curbing and rubber matting) on the site plan Sheet C3.0. Based on the submitted survey, show on all appropriate sheets the lO-foot wide utility easement along a portion of the Gulfview Boulevard frontage. A double dumpster enclosure is proposed on the adjacent parcel. The enclosure detail on Sheet C6.1 shows a single enclosure. Revise to a double enclosure. Additionally, provide the materials of the enclosure and gates, including the finish materials and proposed color(s). Provide the proposed location of outside mechanical equipment (suggestion to revise Comment 13 on Sheet C3.0). Address outdoor lighting. Provide the height from base flood elevation to the roof deck on the elevations. Show the edge ( above) of the entrance "canopy" near Parkway Drive. Survey indicates many existing palm trees. Indicate on the site plan/landscape plan which trees will be preserved and removed. Provide the proposed colors of the building. Provide a statement that all existing signage will be/has been removed. Proposed signage will need to be processed as a Comprehensive Sign program, since there are two attached SIgnS. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely, \;JCL.jV'L M. \,.J~ Wayne M. Wells, AICP Senior Planner IIMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending cases I Up for the next DRCIGulfview 700 SurfStylelGulfview 700 Incomplete Letter. doc ., . . u. rwater o >- I- - u FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: 1\\ e.~ r ~ \!. ~ _lJ....: ~ La."f'''- FAX: .. 4l\-7" \0 ~ \+ / 7G} ~" '1 'asS- l Phone: 44- 2-- I Loo / 7'73" , ~ fJ ~ I FROM: \r.-.)~ \..J1\\i DATE:~ ~ ( LC;) 'D ~ Phone: St" 2.--=J-'S Cf: RE: 7 DO G; v) ~'\I\e.w ~ \ 'i d. MESSAGE: ~", \ . NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) t .. , RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 09/29/2003 11:42 ~iAME PLAN FAX 7275524575 TEL 7275524557 DATE,TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 09/29 11: 39 94475914 00:132:28 04 OK STANDARD ECM .. ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 09/29/2003 11:55 I-lAME PLAN FAX 7275524575 TEL 7275524557 DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURA TI ON PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 09/29 11: 52 97939855 00:02:29 04 OK STANDARD ECM . . . PLANNING AND DEVELOMENT SERVICES 100 SO. MYRTLE AVE., 2ND FLOOR, CLEARWATER, FL 33756 PHONE: 562-4567; FAX: 562-4576 INSPECTION LINE: 562-4580 DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE KNOW OF ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Clearwater pertaining to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the undersigned, being the fee owner (s) of the following described real property situated in the City of Clearwater, County of Pine lIas and State of Florida, to wit: See..- E",h "}\ I, do hereby make the following declaration of conditions, limitations and restrictions on said lands, hereafter to be known and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE, as to the following particulars: 1. That the aforesaid plot or combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions thereof, shall hereafter be regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an indivisible building site. 2. That the said property shall henceforth be considered as one plot or parcel of land, and that no portion thereof shall be sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or devised separately except in its entirety, as one plot or parcel of land. 3. That this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run with the land, as provided by law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned, and all parties claiming under them until such time as the same may be released in writing under the order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agree(s) that this instrument shall be recorded in the public records of Pin ell as County, Florida. /tf~ day of lk ee rtI b ~_I"'" Signed, sealed, witnessed and acknowledged this ~ ~, at Clearwater, Florida. ~ ~ OWNER(S): ~.R/LP A~~~R4~ STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME personally appeared e/laS /Jnos-ks~ pt>lJuJ and , to me ~ to be the person(s) described in execution thereof to be his, her or their free act and deed for the uses and purpose herein mentioned. /J WITNESS my hand and official seal this / %.P. day of V./Lr--'l/l~~/l-- ftdQ03 ~~ My Commission Expires: '\\'~'~"" Patricia J. Ceehm ~ ~~A"'" Y~Commission #Ca902~U ;' \. ).,(: Expires Feb, 1S, :to(;M ~~:: Bonded 'thrli """Of~,\\", Atlantic Bonding Co., lnr. .", ~ . . Exhibit "A" Parcel I: (17/29/15/05076/003/0110) Lots 11 and 12 in Block C, BA YSIDE SHORES, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 58, Pages 12 and 13, Public Records of Pin ell as County, Florida; Parcel II: (17/29/15/05040/005/0130) Lot 13 in Block E, Bayside Subdivision No.6, Unit B, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 55, Pages 17 and 18, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; Together with that part of the North 15.0 feet of South Gulfview Boulevard (now vacated) abutting Lot 13 of Parcel II on the South. e. e. CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner/Applicant: Representative: Address: December 16. 2003 FLD2003-09045 E8 Mr. Elias Anastasopoulos Alex Plisko. Plisko Architecture. P A 700 South Gulfview Boulevard ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ST AFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to four feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to two feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (36 spaces) to 3.19 spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces) and a reduction in the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five feet to two feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. EXISTING ZONING/ LAND USE: Tourist (T); Resort Facilities High (RFH) PROPERTY SIZE: 0.51 acre PROPERTY USE: Former Use: Retail sales and services (bank; demolished) Proposed Use: Retail sales and services ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USES: North: Retail sales and services (Bay Bazaar Shopping Center) West: Retail sales and services East: Retail sales and services (Bay Bazaar Shopping Center) South: Overnight accommodations Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09045 - Page 1 ee e. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.51-acre site is located on the north side of Gulfview Boulevard at the intersection with Parkway Drive and is zoned Tourist District. It is located within a highly developed, tourist-dominated area of South Clearwater Beach. This site was developed with a bank including four drive-thru lanes, which has been demolished. The balance of this block is developed with the Bay Bazaar Shopping Center. The site is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach By Design, which is a distinctive area of mixed uses including high rise condominiums, resort hotels and commercial uses. Beach By Design contemplates this District will be an area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach. There are four active redevelopment projects for residential uses (townhouses and condominium) at 620, 656, 674 and 692 Bayway Boulevard. The Bay Bazaar Shopping Center was approved, but has yet to be constructed, under FL 00-11-49 to add a restaurant on the eastern end of the shopping center adjacent to Gulf Boulevard. Proposal: The proposal includes constructing a one-story, 7,200 square-foot retail sales building with 23 parking spaces in place of the former bank building. The style and exterior color (walls: peach; accent trim: red orange; peaked roof accent: Spanish clay tile) of the proposed building will be similar to the existing Surf Style building at 422 Mandalay Avenue, approved by the Community Development Board under Case FLD2002-07018. The building will be oriented toward South Gulfview Boulevard, with its main pedestrian entrance adjacent to Parkway Drive and a secondary pedestrian entrance facing South Gulfview Boulevard. In order to meet Building Code requirements for FEMA, the building is designed with a wall inside the outside windows providing a separate display area that is flood proofed (only employees can access this perimeter display area thru flood proofed access doors). Building pedestrian access areas are otherwise protected through acceptable flood proofing methods. A small mezzanine area is planned in above the restrooms and dressing rooms in the northwest comer of the building. The applicant is proposing an interactive water feature (actual design not yet selected by the applicant) on the east side of the building with drainable rubber matting. The proposed parking lot design, oriented east to west, will act as an extension of the adjacent Bay Bazaar Shopping Center parking lot. The northern driveway on South Gulfview Boulevard for the Bay Bazaar Shopping Center will be rebuilt as part of this proposal to be a joint driveway straddling the property line (therefore, the reason for the requested zero side setback request). The proposed parking lot will also have a right in/right out driveway on Parkway Drive, due to Parkway Drive having a landscaped median. A small retention area is planned at the southwest comer of the property. The applicant is requesting setback reductions to the proposed building, to the proposed rubber matting for the interactive water feature and to the proposed pavement. The property owner also imposed certain site design constraints to accommodate the design, location and tenants of the adjacent Bay Bazaar Shopping Center. The proposed building has been positioned to not visually block the adjacent building to the south. Additionally, a 30-foot wide view corridor was required to allow views of the entrance to the pub to the east (as part of the Bay Bazaar Shopping Center). To comply with these design parameters, the applicant designed the site parallel with South Gulfview Boulevard. The parcel is not a rectangular site, thereby producing some of the requested reductions. The proposed site design also complies with Beach by Design criteria, requiring the building to be positioned close to the right-of-way of Parkway Drive to allow for a pedestrian friendly building. The applicant is requesting a reduction of the front setback along South Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09045 - Page 2 e. e. Gulfview Boulevard from 15 feet to four feet (to pavement) to be consistent with landscape areas on the adjacent Bay Bazaar Shopping Center. By complying with Beach by Design, the site design produces requests to reduce the front (west) setback from 15 feet to two feet for the building and from 15 feet to zero feet for the handicap sidewalk ramp (due to the change in site elevation). The applicant has also designed a ramp on the north side of the building at a zero-foot setback to allow for deliveries. Due to the irregularities of the northern property line and the lining-up of the site improvements parallel with South Gulfview Boulevard, the building position at its closest point to the property line produces a one-foot setback. The rubber matting for the interactive water feature has been positioned at a five-foot setback from the north property line and a three-foot setback from the east property line. As previously mentioned, the requested zero-foot setback to pavement from the east property line is a function of the redesign to provide a joint-use driveway straddling the property line with the adjacent Bay Bazaar Shopping Center. Additionally, the applicant is requesting a reduction of the required five-foot width of the building foundation planting area to as little as a two-foot width. The width varies between two feet on the eastern portion of the building and three-foot, seven-inch on the western building portion. This width is again a product of applicant and site design constraints. The requested setback reductions are consistent with setbacks on the adjacent property and with other commercial properties in the vicinity, as well as desired under Beach by Design. The proposal will be compatible with the surrounding development and may influence redevelopment efforts for commercially-developed property in the vicinity. The applicant is requesting a reduction of the amount of parking spaces required for this retail sales establishment from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (36 spaces) to 3.19 spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces). Considering building square footage devoted to actual retail sales area accessible to customers, the window display areas (discussed above) and storage mezzanine reduces the square footage from 7,200 to 6,182 square feet, effectively producing a parking ratio of 3.72 spaces per 1,000 square feet (based on the 23 spaces provided). As a point of reference, the Flexible Standard Development parking standards for retail sales and services in the Tourist District provides a range between four and five spaces per 1,000 square feet. The applicant has providing documentation showing 83 existing parallel parking spaces available to the general public within the rights-of-way of South Gulfview Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard within 1,000 feet of the subject property. A parking analysis submitted for the expansion of the adjacent Bay Bazaar Shopping Center (approved under FL 00-11-49, not constructed) indicated that existing parking at the shopping center was underutilized and would be sufficient with the proposed expansion. The developer also operates the Surf Style retail store at 422 Mandalay Avenue, which has no on-site parking, utilizing on-street and parking lot parking spaces within the vicinity and has indicated no issues related to inadequate provided parking. The developer is relying on the tourist trade from the surrounding area walking to the proposed retail store, much as it exists at the existing store on Mandalay A venue. The applicant proposes to utilize the existing adjacent dumpster on the property to the north. An agreement with the abutting property owner will be necessary, acceptable to the Solid Waste Department, prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. While there is a small retention pond provided, the applicant will need to make payment in lieu of stormwater attenuation to the City prior the issuance of any building permits. There do exist overhead utilities within the abutting rights-of-way. All proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) will Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09045 - Page 3 e. e. be required to be placed underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontage be completed prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy to provide for the future undergrounding of these existing overhead utilities. While the former bank building has been removed from the site, there still exists parking areas and a freestanding sign. This existing freestanding sign will be removed and only attached signage provided on the proposed building. Since there are two attached signs proposed, signage will need to be processed through the Comprehensive Sign Program. The applicant has specified Natal plum shrubs along the sidewalk on South Gulfview Boulevard. This shrub has thoms, is poisonous and should not be used along pedestrian paths. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the landscape plan should change this shrubbery to another suitable plant. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 803.C) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA (Sections 2-801 and 2-803): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.32 X AREA RATIO (FAR) (maximum 1.0) IMPERVIOUS 0.85 X SURFACE RATIO (lSR) (maximum 0.95) LOT AREA (10,000 22,216 square feet X square feet minimum) LOT WIDTH (100 South Gulfview Blvd: 202 feet X feet minimum) Parkwav Drive: 117 feet FRONT SETBACK South Gulfview Blvd: Four feet (to X* (15 feet minimum) pavement) Parkway Drive: Two feet (to building); zero feet (to sidewalk) REAR SETBACK (20 N/ A (comer lots have two front and X feet minimum) two side setbacks) SIDE SETBACK (10 North: Zero feet (to ramp); one foot X* feet minimum) (to bldg); five feet (to rubber matting) East: Zero feet (to pavement); three feet (to rubber matting) HEIGHT (50 feet 34 feet X maximum) PARKING SPACES 23 spaces X* (five spaces/lOOO sf - 36 spaces reauired) *See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09045 - Page 4 e. e. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.C): 1. Consistent Inconsistent [ ] Consistent Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, [X] coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of [X] adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons [X] residing or working in the neighborhood. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. [X] Development is consistent with the community character of the [X] immediate vicinity. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, [X] including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09045 - Page 5 2. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The use or mIX of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. [X] [X] [X] [X] [X] [X] [X] [X] [X] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Inconsistent [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] e. e. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on October 30, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to four feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to two feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (36 spaces) to 3.19 spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces) and a reduction in the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five feet to two feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C for the site at 700 South Gulfview Boulevard, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any building permit; 3. That an agreement with the abutting property owner for joint use of the dumpster on the adjacent property is required, acceptable to the Solid Waste Department, prior to the issuance of any building permits; 4. That, in lieu of stormwater attenuation, payment be made to the City, in an amount determined by the City, prior the issuance of any building permits; 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontages be completed prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy; 6. That signage meet the requirements of Code and a Comprehensive Sign Program be processed for more than one attached sign. Any freestanding signage shall be limited to monument-style, not to exceed six feet in height designed to match the color and material of the building; and 7. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, the landscape plan be revised to change the Natal palm shrubs to a suitable plant, acceptable to the Planning Department. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09045 - Page 6 e. -. ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application \ IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending cases I Up for the next CDBIGulfview 700 Suif Style (T}IGulfview 700 Staff Report. doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09045 - Page 7 Owner: Site: . . """"" ~ Location Map Elias Anastasopoulas Case: 700 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Size(Acres): PIN: Atlas Page: PROJECT SITE FLD2003-09045 0.51 acres 17/29/15/05076/003/0110 17/29/15/05040/005/0130 285A . . ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ----------1 Retail : , _. .sales : -...._--.__..~_-I-_I C\j c ~ c c , '. , ' '" , J ~Jl "" / Overnight /2 : / '. ~-ccO-mm~dations<--,,~ I ".. _... I" ---..:- ..~ . . . , , , , . .. . . Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner: Elias Anastasopoulas Case: FLD2003-09045 Site: 700 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 0.51 acres A ~ ..,J OJ u. 5 C) ,- --. ~-. - I . : '. , , " , , , . ., :~ ".; ~ PIN: 17/29/15/05076/003/0110 17/29/15/05040/005/0130 Atlas Page: 285A . GINA '. . '. - . . . , ," Aerial Map Owner: Elias Anastasopoulas \ Case: Property Size(Acres) : FLD2003-09045 Site: 700 South Gulfview Boulevard 0.51 acres PIN: 17/29/15/05076/003/0110 17/29/15/05040/005/0130 Atlas Page: 285A . e WATER A WATER ~~---I , ' ,-- : .- , , , ~ '" ~ ~~ ~ ~ ..,J !XI 1l. 5 C> 1---."-. ., , ; ,CRD . , , , .,: :- , .. -, __...___.__~~._,__f C't 0 'It' 0 0 ,.-;----.........---- I " ~i .l " ., I...... .. .. __. ... ... ... WATER future Land Use Map Owner: Elias Anastasopoulas I Case: Property Size(Acres): FLD2003-09045 Site: 700 South Gulfview Boulevard 0.51 acres PIN: 17/29/15/05076/003/0110 17/29/15/05040/005/0130 Atlas Page: 285A . . A ,,-----.. . . , p ~:I---I , ' ,-' : .- , DO ~ I t.: 1---- ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ , '. .....----- --- ...-.._, " . '. , , , , , ------, , , , , , , , .. -.._-- -......'" '". -,--' ~ 0 'It 0 0 . .' '----.. , " , , , , , , " ;:: '" ~.!I ~ <; ., ". p Zoning Map Owner: Elias Anastasopoulas I Case: Property Size(Acres) : FLD2003-09045 Site: 700 South Gulfview Boulevard 0.51 acres PIN: 17/29/15/05076/003/0110 17/29/15/05040/005/0130 I Atlas Page: 285A . "~-~<~..:'i.....::;.. -".:....... ~ ki~~~~;;:~r' ,: :< .~ -,~~:~,~~~, - I:;;;l~- View looking northeast at subject property View looking south along east property line of subject property (including adjacent shopping center) 700 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2003-09045 . View looking north at subject property (including adjacent shopping center) View looking west at retail property across Parkway Drive 1 . "'-~,~. . .~/;::. ;w-:\' ;".~:,L~- . . View looking south across South Gulfview Boulevard ~ View looking southeast at adjacent shopping center 700 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2003-09045 . View looking southwest across South Gulfview Boulevard View of existing similar Surf Style at 422 Mandalay Avenue 2 ENG 72.476914 p.2 t .- '. :3 12: 18p :2.'~9/2003 11:59 P Wko Arch 7275~'j PAGE 02 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRA nON 100 S MynIe Ave., #220, 3'1756-5.520 PO BolIO 4748., Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Phone: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)562-4755 AP~,ICATION FOR PAYMENT IN LIEU OF RETENTION j ~: .1 N^^~ (J F SITE :11: LoeATI ~N~ -i!I F'.RZFAR~D BY: ~f!'~. DATE; : " OWNER'S NAM~I. I:"fH}NE: Itf ADDRESJ: I,; ----i'! I': CONTRACTOR J ~jiEPRES.J);N'rATIVE (if any): l"IfONJk. :.i: 727-4~ 2-7200 ADDRES~i: ---"!: 800 UIl?" SL Cle8J:Wate~. Fl 33755 REASON fOR RE~~UEST: No room on site for attgnuation It ~ll. i{ Ir1 b~ comul,,, Ii /", PJY A :~h'lill&' rational 'imflllw.1Q= iJClA.) Surf !;tyle 700 S. Culfview Blvd. Brian Barker 9/30/1)3 Klis l~astaBopoulos 127-4hl-9l00 630 S. Gulfviev Blvd. Alex Plisko :1 A,: TOTAL ARI.Aj.Jfl~.. i'SITE (Divide II by 43.560) "......~~7..!.~..~.L............. , CD Cpre - Cpos. Oll'eighted R\Uloff Coefficient After Development)............,' ! C, re = ((.9~ii!< el!:isting in pervious area ) + (20)( perviOllS area)) f total area . _ ~ost = ((Am~ ]I: e:osting ~pervious area)'" + (.20 x pervlous area)) I total area . 1- 3.6 (l:ased on l~r,) mm. T.O.~) j'.L\Q = I\CJA .." "'~'I;;.' ........ ~4?'iL ~.IJ.O...Q>", ... ,............ ... \ CITY OF CLJ:AR."r<ATER VOl,. REQUIRED (AQ x 3600) _~..u._._..._...,.t...u... ~ , !]';fJ"imum SWFWMip first 112" or A/24) .............. ,......."........................ ,,\""OLl:'"1\IEPRO D ............ ............................,..........._.... '.................. ~ i TOTAL VI>L TO 'ECOMPEJfSATED- BY P.IL.(). 1 (volumere<luiredbyl lity -vol. prcvided) ...................., P.lL.O. A'U'..A to' I volume f 3H. (assumed pond depth) ". .............. ...... ~ ESTIMATI1:D L 'VALUE (J 25% offax assessedvaIu.e) ,.................. = $ TO'IALAl~OUNTitillJE (p.I.LOareaxesbmatedlandvalue) ................ =$ i I .use .95. 'Or flood ~rt\.o'1e area I. .51 (ACRE) .95 .475 .87 3132 926 941 cJ. s, cf. c.f. ef 219/ 730 43 3 ] / .974 . c.t. sf, per s.t Section 32.311 of/he ~!/,lde (}{Ord/nances of the City allowsdeve/opers to maJce payment in theform offee.in-/ieu- tJf charges a TdwO'lll!' 4~t:rtai" C'01tstn rction ~quinmlmls. Thf: awrrer lI7TderslamJs am! agrees thut the Paymerrt '" Lf",) of Retel ,tion m ' lhe tnade pd, 'r fo tire ISS1fQnCe of a Buildmg Permit and the City reserves the right fa use sUI~!eCf fi1~fI1r conS:"ctlon 0 i'~ stormwolr facil/ties QJ designated by the City Manager ee-Z ',. ../~) fL.-B'" 03 " Da~ 1 I' I. i.- S' \Wordlr/tmpla "V'aymellf 1'1.U/t1l (If Rsteml,'n.d(lc rtviI,d: JOfJ 4191 , :. " ':2,::"'::18 03 12: 18p P.SkO Arch 72.476914 p. 1 C~1 JJi JJJJi ilr_'JJI FAX TRANSMITTAL (121) 441 - 6'114 C, 7'( Of- CL~t/ZuJArlfV1-- ATTENTICN: :;(,O rr f;t cC RoE: A9fL.rCI\J 7701V ~O/L fAY~l!:Nr)1\) ?/til{ rJf ;2.f3'7@J'i?O,.AJ '-:'i,-C:: .'""1:1'\1 . 700 t?f' ~W(;,(\)L~ . . - :?_, IT. 12-- e> - 0') TIME SENT. 1(,' lU A.dv1 NO:~ SENT TO: tj)&Z-4-7~;S FAX NUMBER: -tARD COP'( TO fOLLO~: YEs:D 'lUMBER OF PAGES TRt...NSMITTED INCLUDING THIS SHEET: 2- COMMENTS: . .'. ... ,......~,.....'.. . .. .'. . .. . ... .. . .. . , . , . . ..~ . . .. . .:.. . i IF TH2{IS TRjSHISSIO ~,~T LEGIBLE, PLEASE C,ONTAGT US. "l;, 6Y; / ) , Pliska Architecture, P .A., AlA - 800 Drew Street Clearwater. Florida 33755-4516 727-461-0030 727-442~72oo Fax 727-447-6914 Florida Architect Corpomtion License Nwnber AA COOOS13 email aparchitect@aol.com ",' M ::;s g j:l.. N - M V) -- V) Sj ~ V) ~lrlC ;: ~ > ~Q\..J ."" c:r In ~ ~ 3: ,Cg!!! .> a a: ;: ~ ..J < ~ s ~~cn ~ ~ 0 = Vl 0 U ~ to- ~~j -0 <.> .... :::.::: <.> ..... i=: i u o Z ~ ~ M o ~~ o - o:l ~ ~ 5 o o ~ o Z M o o N -- 0\ -- o - M o o N -- N N -- 0\ ~ o ..... > o ~ 01) ~ ~ u S <<I .... E-< o t- o o o .....:l ~ ..>i C<l ~ "0 i~ o-u <<IZ gjO "'U Irlo >f-; 8,0 ~gs 'S:: ...... .0> ~~ ~~ "C~ [{J~ .g~ >>0 .t:: VJ Uu 0...... ,..c::.....:l f-;~ ::::--Cl-. M o ~ ~I t::r/J - - ~I r/J ~ z o o ~ o Z M o o ~ t- -- - - M o o N -- N N -- 0\ ~ o 'S: o ~ 01) .s o o .S gf ~ o 00 o o o .....:l ~ es Irl "0 ~ .- .....:l ~ ~Z ~ ~ .~ :s ~ - '" Cl-. f-; -0 13 .-< ~",~.....:l = 8.~>- Irloo~ ~ 6.12 ~ U)Q)Q)~ coS~~ .s[{J"'r/J .~ 6 ~ '-' '" 6. i=: Z .Ef !ij<:~ ~ t'J .0"0...... 'x 0 S >< o u Ul 00-g~ oS.so(/.) o~....::> ~~.s~ g6so >> s '.p ~ ,..c:: u lIS (/.) ~ R e;; NO 8 ~ M o ~ ~I N -- 0\ o ~ o Z M o o N -- N N -- 0\ .S "0 ..8 u <<I ~ '" 1:1 o ~ a u_ OJ:l.. OJ:l.. V) -.:t N <: o .....:l ~ M o ~~ ~~ N - ~ ~ ~ o o ~ o Z PI o o ~ o M -- - M o o N -- N N -- 0\ 0- o .... j:l.. 01) .~ ;j < o E-< .... .... 0 ~ ~ ~o V) M N <: o .....:l ~ PI o ~~ ~~ -- o ~ ~ ~ 5 o ~ o Z PI o o N -- V) - -- o M o o N -- N N -- 0\ '" '" ~ o - o ]- o U ...... o .... o ~ o .....:l o M N <: o .....:l ~ e M o 00 ~ <:1 N -- 0\ ~ o Z M o o N -- N N -- 0\ ~ o '"0 ~ ..... <<I ::;s o o -.:t -.:t N <: 9 ~ M o ~<: ~ ~I o - <: ~I ~ 5 o ~ ::I:: M o o N -- M -- o - M o o N -- N N -- 0\ '"0 u ~ >> ~ r/J o o ~ 00 - o <: o .....:l ~ M o ~~ ~~ N - ~ ~ ~ 5 o o ~ o Z PI o o N -- t- N -- o M o o N -- N ~ 0\ '"0 o ~ o .... U ~ ::;s o M - <: o .....:l ~ ~ b 's; .'" u -< ~ '" u M o ~~ ~~ N - ~ ~ M ...... o ~ z o o o ~ Cl-. ~ ::I:: M o o N -- M -- N - M o o N -- N N -- 0\ ~ .9 - <<I "3 u (;j U o 01) <<I .S '"0 <<I U .... 0 O~ \0 - o <: 9 ~ . M ~ g ~ N V) M V) --- V) ~ r:'! V) ~lt'lc ... '0:1' > - =...J I:'-l c:l'\ ... q III ~ ~ 3: ;....=w - =- ... N > >QLL ~ ;...;l...J CJ~::J < .. ~ <lJ~'" I:'-l ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 U ~ " ~~I -0 u I- =-=u ~ Z ~ ~ <'I o ~~ ~~ --- o ~ ~ ~ Z o Q ~ o Z <'I o o N --- 0'1 - --- o M o o N --- N N --- 0'1 m 11) 11) ~ ~ 11) .;: ~ 0;; 00 11) ~ o \0 o Q Q ~ ~ <'I o ~< ~ p:;1 --- o < p:;1 ~ Z o Q ~ o Z ('I o o N --- '<t - --- o <'I o o N --- '<t - --- o - M o o N --- N N --- 0'1 ~ 11) .;: 11) p:; 11) U ~ o m 11) p:; "'Cl a ~ o V) o Q 9 ~ . .5 8 "2~00 'i @'c] "3 ~ ..>:l 1;l Q:~ ~ ~ tTj ~ "'Cl ~"2 'S;: '::> "'Cl 00 o .l!l I'::: ,- I'::: ~ '~ .~ e ;g vi[5Q.;::l ~ oo~~~ N I'::: .... - I'::: I'::: ~ I:) =j O:l :s~~ B ,<::.D ~ E 6 ~ B t: & 'E,. :$6.9 '(1) o 't: .: ~ ~ "OQ.oO'lE ~ ,~ ~ ...: Q) Vl -6-5;:~.D E- eJ.)14-l..... Z 't7l I'::: ,e 0 ~ ~ Er~S~~ ~ "0 B 0 I'::: 0 66~~~'Eu Q.,~Q.,I1)~~O .....; "0 N ;S Q., .~ z M o ~:;j ~~ --- 0'1 M o ~ <I ~Q --- 0'1 :;j ~ <I Q ~ 5 Q ~ z o Q 11) := o Z 11) := o Z M o o N --- o M --- 0'1 M o o N --- o M --- 0'1 M o o ~ N ~ 0'1 M o o ~ N N --- 0'1 ~ 11) ';: ~ .... 2 <<l ~ o ..... Vl o - o Q Q ~ ~ ~ 11) ';: 11) p:; 11) .... ...... ~ o N o Q Q ~ ~ ~ <<l !ij ..c: - m ] til ',p 5 "0 'fJl 11) .... ~ I'::: ~ I'::: 'en S ~ u ~ ~ o Z <'I o op:; ~~ ~Q o p:; ~ Q ~ z o Q 11) := o Z <'I o o N --- \0 - 23 M o o N --- N N --- 0'1 ~ 11) ';: 11) p:; u 11) p:; o'd ~ <<l ~ o M o Q Q ~ ~ j~ ] ~ ~ g~ 1::-6g. ~~ l1)"ga ~~ ~ B'E I':::~ i"26 ~ "0 "2 ~ 'f: ~~ 51 ~~ 6 ..Q 'fJl 0 (\l ;>, g ]._ 11) 8~ .; ~~ cU.g &! 5* 5 0 ;::l "'" Q. ~~ ~ m~ u~ B ~Q 5 ~ ,~6 E Q) u ~ u S'l :0 <<l Q) i3 ;>,.9 ;::l-tl-l7.i t)...:Q)Q) Os Q.~'a"" o~ ~ ~imB ~""~"OMQe~J;j r- "'_ 0 00Q...c:.... ,.:.. -fi5 til 6 0 .S 00 6 8- o m;t-'!;~ 'lil :='':::"0 "'- ~ I'::: :S 0 ,- ',p O:l - NoYlO:::::~S~;::l ~~.g~:::;:::~..::l~ <'I o ~t:l ---..... ;::E- --- - t:l ..... E- Q ~ o ::r: ~ o Z <'I o o N --- o - --- - - M o o N --- N N --- 0'1 ~ 11) .;: ~ 11) ..... m <<l ~ :E - o r:/) o '<t o Q Q ~ ~ M o ~~ ~~ N - ~ ~ ~ z o Q ~ o Z M o o N --- - --- N - M o o N --- N N --- 0'1 .<;:: m :> 11) - ~ o '<t - < 9 ~ ~ i> 's: '= (,l -< 1A " u M o -- o ~ ~ Q <'I o o ~~ ~~ --- o ~ ~ ~ z o Q M ..... o N Q) ~ Q.. 11) := o Z <'I o o N --- 0'1 - --- o M o o N --- N N --- 0'1 00 .S - 11) 11) ~ ~ Q o '<t o < Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 Q... N - M 'n -- 'n s::l c:'! 'n ~l()C ; ~ > fI.lQ\...J ..... c:r m ~ ~ 3: cg~ ..... M > ~QLL. ; ~...J CJ~::J <..0 QJ::f:t:tJ) fI.l aJ 0 ~ fI.l 0 U U.... ~~I -0 '-' .... :::.:::...; ~ ~ M o ~~ M~ N -- 0'1 ~I ~ z o o ~ o Z M o o N -- N N -- 0'1 "'0 o > .iJ u ~ = .Q - ~ .::l -a <' o - o < 9 ~ <Ii .~ - :os 5 u ~ U) <'I o ~~ ;::~ -- o ~ ~ o .....:l o :::r:: o = o Z <'I o o N -- 0'1 - -- o M o o N -- N N -- 0'1 ~ o .... > o p::: gf .13 o N N - o o o .....:l ~ . '" 5 .~ :os 5 u ~ '" M o ~o ~ <I o - ~I o .....:l o :::r:: ~ o Z M o o N -- 0'1 N -- 0'1 M o o N -- N N -- 0'1 ~ o .S: ~ OIl = .~ u '" 'g ~ .....:l """ - o o 9 ~ z :s Cl.. '" ~ .g,gJ 5~ ~~ o ~~ - ...... oU) ~...... .~ ~ .6 ~ .~~ uU) ~ti ~::E c.8~ tiC s~ ~c ft~ "'...... 0> ]~ M o Op::: ~ I t:::(/) - - P:::1 (/) ~ Z o o o = o Z M o o N -- r-- -- - - <'I o o N -- o - -- o M o o N -- N N -- 0'1 ~ o .S: o p::: -; ~ ~ o .... .~ ~ N """ o o 9 ~ ~ Z <'I o ~~ ~~ -- o ~ ~ ~ 5 o o = o Z <'I o o ~ """ ~ o M o o N -- N N -- 0'1 ~ o .S: ~ .... o - '" ~ ~ .... o of ~ :::r:: o 0'1 o o o .....:l ~ <'I o ~~ ;::~ -- o ~ ~ ~ o o = o Z M o o N -- 0'1 N -- 0'1 <'I o o N -- 0'1 - -- o ...... '" '" o = o - o ]- o ~ ....... '+-< o .... o i:: o .....:l o """ N < 9 ~ . ~ i> os; "J;; " -< 1i oj u M '+-< o M o 1'Jl Cl.. · Conditions Associated Wit' FLD2003-09045 700 S GULFVIEW BL VO Landscape 11/07/2003 Arden Dittmer 562-4604 The Natal plum has thorns and is poisonous, and should not be used along pedestrian paths, change to another suitable plant. Not Met Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504 11/06/2003 11/6/03 - WW - Include as a condition in the Development Order. Not Met 10/19/03 - WW A Unity of Title document will be required to be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. 11/06/2003 11/6/03 - WW - Include as a condition in the Development Order. Not Met 10/19/03 - WW The survey indicates the existence of overhead power and communication lines adjacent to this property within the rights-of-way. Code provides in Section 3-911 that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable." Undergrounding the existing overhead power lines and communication lines within the rights-of-way, or at least providing conduits along the street frontages for future undergrounding, may be a requirement of this proposal. Advise/address. 11/6/03 - WW - Include as a condition in the Development Order. 10/19/03 - WW Provide a statement that all existing signage will be/has been removed. Proposed signage will need to be processed as a Comprehensive Sign program, since there are two attached signs. 11/06/2003 Not Met Print Date: 12/04/2003 CaseConditons 1 of 1 1- . . Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Subject: Dittmer, Arden Friday, November 07, 2003 4:02 PM Wells, Wayne RE: FLD2003-09045, 700 S. Gulfview Blvd. one comment.. plants shown along pedestrian walk are dangerous (poisonous and thorns). Arden Dittmer Development Review Specialist City of Clearwater (727)562-4567 ext.2563 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, November 07,200311:56 AM To: Albee, Rick; Anderson, Duanne; Berry, Bryan; Clayton, Gina; Dittmer, Arden; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Fierce, Lisa; Gerlock, Frank; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Mariano, Marc; Melone, Donald; Morris, William; Nicodemus, Sherrie; Parry, Mark; Reynolds, Mike; Rice, Scott; Richter, Debbie; Schodtler, John; Yellin, Catherine Subject: FLD2003-09045, 700 S. Gulfview Blvd. DRC Members - Revised plans have been submitted in response to comments made at the October 30, 2003, DRC meeting for the above referenced project. I have placed ONE set of plans and documents on top of the file cabinets outside the Planning/Building Departments conference room 216. Please stop by ASAP to review these revisions to determine whether they have complied with your comments. This proiect is tentatively to be scheduled for the Community Development Board for the December 16. 2003. meetinq pendinq your review as to sufficiency. Please revise Permit Plan accordingly and send me an emailletting me know you have completed your review. If some aspect of the proposal can be handled through a condition on the approval of the case by the CDB, then put same under conditions under Permit Plan. Thanks - Wayne Following is the Final comments from the 10/30/03 DRC meeting: << File: Gulfview 700 Final DRC Comments 1 0.30.03.doc >> 1 . . Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Subject: Rice, Scott Friday, November 07,20033:46 PM Wells, Wayne FLD2003-09045 - 700 S. Gulfview Wayne The plans for this application have been revised to adequately address all revisions required prior to COB. The agreement for payment in lieu of stormwater attenuation must still be signed prior to COB. Let me know if you have any questions. Scott Rice Land Deve/. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 srice@c/earwater-f1.com 1 r . . CDB Meeting Date: February 20, 2001 Case Number: FL 00-11-49 Agenda Item: B3 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ST AFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNER: Mr. Louis Anastasopoulos LOCATION: 731 Bayway Boulevard REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a restaurant in the Tourist District, reduce the front (east) setback from 10 feet to 1.6 feet (along Gulf Boulevard), and reduce the required number of parking spaces from 105 spaces to 70 spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. PLANS REVIEWED: Site plan and parking analysis submitted by Jonnatti Architecture, Inc. SITE INFORMATION: .. PROPERTY SIZE: 1.79 acres; 78,117 square feet ... DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 405 feet of width by 230 feet of depth PROPERTY USE: Current use: Proposed use: ," Retail sales and s~rVhte (Bay Bazaar Shopping Center) Restaurant (addition ~ existing shopping center) PLAN CATEGORY: RFH, Resort Facilities High Classification ZONING DISTRICT: T, Tourist District ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached Dwellings South: Overnight Accommodations East: Attached Dwellings West: Retail Sales and Service Page 1 . . ({!;U CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is dominated by residential, commercial and resort uses. UPDATE: This application was continued by the Community Development Board on January 23,2001 at the request of the applicant to further address access and circulation issues. There have been minor changes to the staff report. ANALYSIS: The roughly L-shaped site is 1.79 acres located on the southwest comer of Bayway Boulevard and Gulf Boulevard. The lot has 263 feet of frontage on South Gulfview Boulevard (south), 145 feet of frontage on Gulf Boulevard (east), 380 feet of frontage on Bayway Boulevard (north) and 106 feet of frontage Parkway Drive (west). The site contains two, one-story, masonry-block buildings bifurcated by a covered plaza 22 feet wide at the north end and 39 feet wide at the south end. The east building is 8,552 square feet and the west building is 8,184 totaling 16,736 square feet. The existing buildings are located 70 feet from the north (front), 50 feet from the south (front), 55 feet from the east (front), and 120 feet from the west (front) property lines. The site is a comer lot and, due to its shape, has four front setbacks - north (Bayway Boulevard), south (South Gulfview Boulevard), east (Gulf Boulevard) and west (Parkway Drive). The property has two side setbacks that form the intersection of the "L" - a west and south property line. The existing building is located one foot from the east (side) property line and two feet from the west (side) property line. The existing parking lot, zero feet from the west (Parkway Drive) property line, two feet from the north (Bayway Boulevard) property line, three feet from the south (South Gulfview Boulevard) property line, two feet from the south (side) property line and two feet from the east (Gulf Boulevard) property line, contains 87 parking spaces. The site is located within a desirable commercial area on Clearwater Beach at the north end of the Sand Key Bridge. The shopping center was built during the early 1970's and has been in continuous operation for over 25 years. While the center has been maintained reasonably well and has received minor renovations over the years, it has undergone some deterioration and appears dated. This addition, combined with a complete renovation of the fa<;:ade, constitutes the first major renovation in its history. The existing masonry block, one-story structures have a sand-colored, stucco exterior with light-gray wood beam accents and rough-cut stone accents. The structure has a dark-brown, asphalt shingle roof. The uses within the existing building include seven retail sales and service establishments, two restaurants and one office. One of the restaurants (the British Pub) offers limited outdoor dining. One tenant space is currently vacant. Page 2 . . The applicant seeks to expand the shopping center by adding a one-story, 4,200 square foot restaurant offering greater dining options to the residents and visitors of Clearwater Beach. The total building area will increase from 16,736 square feet to 20,936 square feet. The proposal also includes the removal of 17 parking spaces 13 of which are currently located three feet from the east (Gulf Boulevard) property line. The remaining four parking spaces are located on the west side of property (two of which are zero feet from the west property line). The proposed addition will be built to the same, conforming front (north and south) setbacks as currently exist. The proposed addition is part of a major renovation to the fa<;ade of the existing building including a "Bar Harbor"-style building fa<;ade, a taupe and coral color scheme and a blue, standing seam, metal roof. The proposal also includes extensive landscaping along all street frontages and interior landscaping which will exceed the intent of the Code. Some additional modifications are needed to the landscape plan including a tiered effect along Gulf, South Gulfview and Bayway Boulevards, providing a mix of foliage texture and color and reducing the use of sod. All existing and proposed signage will meet Code requirements. The applicant is planning to modify signage for all tenants within the center. Fencing and landscaping will enclose existing, unenclosed dumpsters (located on the southwest side northeast comers of the site) and a clothing drop-off box (also located on the west side of the site) will be removed. The proposal also includes removing the north access point along Parkway Drive leaving two access points along Gulf Boulevard (east), one access point (an ingress-only) along Parkway Drive (west) and a single access point each from and Bayway and South Gulfview Boulevards. Parking will be revised to provide three, ADA-compliant handicap spaces. While the proposed restaurant will be geared primarily to serve breakfast, it will be open throughout the day providing lunch and dinner as well. The request is to reduce the required front (east) setback along Gulf Boulevard from 1 0 feet to 1.6 feet. The request also incl :es to 70 spaces. Required parking fo aces per 1,000 square feet of gross flo( ~enter is 84 spaces. The restaurant a -z-o. I ') v '}. )":.. IDS- ) spaces (seven spaces per 1,000 squar Jonnatti Architecture, Inc. als upon by Staff and includes a ] August 26, 2000 (Saturday) G used between the hours of 8:1 day. U.'3\., = 1\J ; agreed )etween es were m. each 70 \ - . Z-o.'13>lJ':.. 3,3;- t:.,~! /, ~ 1~ The parking analysis shows th 1 :00 p.m., there was a minimt: parking-demand generating t parking lot is at its lowest wid ..m.and )ming), ~xisting . . CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS There is a single code enforcement issue associated with this property which is that there are two unenclosed dumpsters. This violation will be remedied as part of the improvements proposed for this property. A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN THE T, TOURIST DISTRICT: STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? FLOOR AREA 1.0 0.21 0.27 Yes RATIO IMPERVIOUS 0.95 0.89 0.90 Yes SURFACE RATIO B. FLEXIBILITY ST ANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE T, TOURIST DISTRICT: INFILL ST ANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? LOT AREA N/A 78,118 square 78,118 square Yes feet feet LOT WIDTH N/A 405 feet 405 feet Yes HEIGHT N/A 35 feet 35 feet Yes FRONT YARD N/A North - 3 feet North - 3 feet Yes SETBACK South - 4 feet (no change) East - 3 feet South - 4 feet West - 0 feet (no change) East - 1.6 feet West - 0 feet (no change) SIDE YARD N/A South - 2 feet South - 2 feet Yes SETBACK South - 4 feet South - 4 feet (no change) REAR YARD N/A N/A N/A N/A** SETBACK Page 4 . . STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? PARKING Determined by 87 70 Yes, based on SPACES the Community submitted parking Development study. Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards* Staff has used five spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (105 parking spaces required) as the ratio for required parking for the proposed 4,200 square foot restaurant and the existing, 16,736 square foot shopping center. ** Comer lots have front and side setbacks but no rear setback requirement. * C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from intensity and development standards. There are 13 existing parking spaces approximately three feet from the east (Gulf Boulevard) property line. The proposed addition will include a covered walkway that will be approximately two feet from that property line. The proposed walkway will match the existing walkway that wraps around the entire complex. The addition is part of a larger refurbishing of the entire plaza. The proposal also includes reducing the required parking by 30 spaces from 105 spaces to 70. Required parking is based on five spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for the entire plaza and the addition or a total of 20,936 square feet. The City has typically calculated parking space requirements for shopping centers using this formula. The applicant has provided a parking study taken over a one-week period, three times per day. The parking study shows that parking demand is highest during mid-day with a maximum of 31 spaces taken. The applicant's proposal would leave at least 42 spaces available at peak times. The restaurant use taken in isolation would normally generate a demand of approximately 46 spaces (the average of seven and 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area). The low parking counts presented in the parking study indicate that most of the shopping center's customer's walk to the site from surrounding condominiums and hotels/motels. The applicant has also shown through the submitted parking study that there is adequate parking onsite to accommodate the proposed addition. Page 5 . . 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The addition to the shopping center should not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The improvements proposed for this site are in keeping with the redevelopment, and will hopefully encourage additional redevelopment and improvements of the area. The improvements to the building include an upgraded "Bar Harbor" -style building fa9ade, a taupe and coral color scheme and a blue, standing seam, metal roof. A new sign band will be installed to accommodate Code-compliant signage sharing a common theme. Site improvements include closing an existing driveway on Bayway Boulevard and creating a new driveway on Gulf Boulevard and landscaping the perimeter and interior in excess of Code requirements to include a tiered effect along South Gulfview Boulevard. The current assessed value of the property is $1,543,000. After the proposed improvements are made (in addition to other improvements not included in this request) the value is expected to be $2,033,000. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the District. The Tourist District permits restaurants. The proposed use is an addition to a permitted use. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The surrounding uses are a mix of attached dwellings, commercial, restaurant and overnight accommodations. This proposal will be compatible with adjacent land uses. The expanded restaurant, as proposed, will be compatible with and should encourage other like redevelopment projects of neighboring sites. Page 6 . . 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses with the comprehensive in fill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The property is uniquely located on Clearwater Beach at the foot of the Sand Key Bridge. The Bay Bazaar Shopping Center has been at this location for approximately 25 years. The renovation and expansion of the restaurant is consistent with the redevelopment plans for Clearwater Beach and the City as a whole. The most unique aspect of the site is its proximity to the Gulf of Mexico and many of the overnight accommodations and residences on both Sand Key and Clearwater Beach, many of which are within a walking distance of the site. There are no other sites available in the City of Clearwater that will afford the applicant these features. Similar tourist and local destinations such as the Sheraton, Ramada Inn, Holiday Inn and Shephard's Resort are located in the immediate vicinity. Also unique to the property are the number of pedestrian customers and the low parking demand of the site. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The architecture and materials will be coordinated with and will enhance the existing structure. Extensive landscaping along the perimeter and interior of the site will exceed Code requirements including a tiered effect along South Gulfview Boulevard. Building improvement include an upgraded "Bar Harbor"-style building fayade to entire structure incorporating a taupe and coral color scheme and a blue, standing seam, metal roof. A new sign band will be installed to accommodate Code-compliant signage sharing a common theme. The economic value of the structure and site is expected to increase with the proposed enhancements and will compliment the neighborhood. Continued reinvestment in properties will aid in the sustainability of the neighborhood. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed improvements to the site, structure and the addition will enhance dining and shopping opportunities helping to increase the attractiveness of Clearwater Beach as a destination point for tourists and residents. The addition is part of an overall fayade and site improvement to the existing shopping center. The investments made to this shopping center will benefit the immediate neighborhood through aesthetics, increased property values, and the potential to influence adjacent property owners to further improve their properties. Page 7 . . 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed improvements to the site and structure will result in increased property values and enhanced community character. Setbacks on all sides except the east (Gulf Boulevard) will remain the same. The east setback will decrease from three feet to 1.6 feet with this proposal. The applicant has shown that there is adequate parking to meet the current demand and any that the addition may generate. The proposal will be in keeping with the character of the area. The improvements to this site might promote continued reinvestment in the neighborhood. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The parking requirement for the complex including the proposed addition is 105 parking spaces (at five spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area). The parking analysis submitted shows 87 parking spaces exist on-site. The applicant has provided a parking study taken over a one-week period, three times per day. The parking study shows that parking demand is highest during mid-day with a maximum of 31 spaces taken. The applicant's proposal would leave at least 42 spaces available at peak times. The restaurant use taken in isolation would normally generate a demand of approximately 46 spaces (the average of seven and 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area). The low parking counts presented in the parking study indicate that most of the shopping center's customers walk to the site from surrounding condominiums and hotels/motels. The applicant has also shown through the submitted parking study that there is adequate parking onsite to accommodate the proposed addition. The parking analysis shows that there will be a minimum of 42 available parking spaces located on- site at any given time. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines on Division 5 of Article 3. The design of the addition will compliment and enhance the exiting structure. The proposal is part of a larger renovation of the entire site including a new fayade, signage and landscaping. The City of Clearwater has not adopted Tourist District design guidelines at this time but the proposal is consistent with the draft "Beach by Design Plan." And the Tourist District which encourages retail and commercial uses. Page 8 . . D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposal includes a one-story addition to an existing shopping center. It will have minimal impact on density or impervious surface ratio. The development will be in harmony with the scale and character of the existing structure and adjacent properties of this dense beach neighborhood. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The site is zoned Tourist District and the proposed use will be in compliance with that zoning. The proposed development should not discourage appropriate development and use of adjacent land buildings. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The use will not change with this proposal. The development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. According to the results of the surveys collected by Jonnatti Architecture, Inc., the peak parking demand was 31 occupied spaces. The parking study indicates that a majority of the plaza's patrons walk to the site. The proposal is expected to have little or no increased effect on parking demands or traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity that includes an emerging redevelopment pattern of existing commercial, overnight accommodation and restaurant uses. Page 9 . . 6. The design of the proposed development mIDlmlzes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. There will be no adverse effects generated by the proposed development. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on December 14, 2000. The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval, with the maximum development potential, requirements of Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects, and with all applicable standards of the Community Development Code. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit a restaurant in the Tourist District, reduce the front (east) setback from 10 feet to 1.6 feet (along Gulf Boulevard), and reduce the required number of parking spaces from 105 spaces to 70 spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, for the site at 731 Bayway Boulevard subject to the following conditions: 1) That a final landscape plan which exceeds the requirements of Code is submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; and 2) That all signage is brought into compliance with Code prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Prepared by: Mark T. Parry, Planner ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application Traffic Study S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX11ncompletelBayway 731 - Bay BazzarlBayway 731 STAFF REPOR T. doc Page 10 .. , 4:30 p.m. ~o ,,\~ ~ . . ~v~ '^"~ 0.-\ f'l." \fl-W Case: FLD2003-09045 - 700 S. Gulfview Boulevard ., ) I Owner/Applicant: Mr. Elias Anastasopoulas. W """" , \ \ '3 ~ 3 Representative: Mr. Alex Plisko, Plisko Architecture, PA (800 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: (727) 442-7200; fax: (727) 447-6914; email: archp(Q),verizon.net). Location: 0.51 acre located on the north side of Gulfview Boulevard at the intersection with Parkway Drive. Atlas Page: 285A. ~,J(" Zoning: T, Tourist District. / Request: Flexible Development {approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to ~feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to ~feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 ft>pt tl,) ~et (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (38 spaces) to ~spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces),.a retWiltiaR afiRt8ri6f llu'lthcupvd aLva fHJm 16- pe.Cvul t~ ~€e "€Ire am Bf th~ .chkI1111f ltIJ8 llres!and a reduction of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the buildin!J, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. \... ~ S' ~r -\0 2... +-.\- ~..~" Proposed Use: A 7,610 square-foot retail sales and services building. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Civic Association (Pres. Mr. David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave., Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; e-mail: dmacnav@att.net). Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Wayne Wells, Duanne Anderson and Scott Rice. Applicant/Representative: Alex Plisko, Danny, and Keith Sacs The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation: a) No comments. Stormwater: a) Proposed water quality pond must draw down within 24hrs. Provide calculations demonstrating this prior to building permits. b) Indicate minimum side slopes (4: 1) for the proposed pond. c) Payment in-lieu of stormwater attenuation will be accepted in the amount of $31,974. Form will be provided at DRC mtg. Form must be signed prior to CDB. Payment must be made prior to any building permits being issued. Traffic Eng:ineering:: a) No comments. General Eng:ineering:: a) Brick pavers are not permitted as a public sidewalk. b) Why not use the existing sanitary sewer "wye" to avoid an open cut through street? (Before the City approves the proposed sanitary sewer connection the road condition must be demonstrated. ) Planning:: a) Revise the description of the request to identify all of the requests as outlined at the beginning of this letter, specifically the landscape reductions, and revise the responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to ensure that the responses include justification for these additional requests. Show interior landscape areas hatched or shaded and labeled. Discuss with Arden Dittmer the landscape areas that may be counted as "interior landscape areas." Recalculate interior landscape square footage and percentage of the vehicular use area, as this may reduce or 'c-~ eliminate the requested reduction (10% required; 3% presently proposed). ~."":!r' ~ A Unity of Title document will be required to be recorded in the public records prior to the ~ issuance of any permits for this project. . ~ A double dumpster enclosure is proposed on the adjacent property to the east. It is unknown r _d~~ _ how this area is developed today and whether there will be any proposed reduction in parking \./'I-~o...~ to accommodate the dumpster enclosure. Advise. ~ ~ Je) The survey indicates the existence of overhead power and communication lines adjacent to this property within the rights-of-way. Code provides in Section 3-911 that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be 2. 3. 4. 5. J b) Page 1 of2 . cr~~. 6. ..\. . rt"'- ~,~ or-- 7. UndergrOeunless such undergrounding is not practica. Undergrounding the existing overhead power lines and communication lines within the rights-of-way, or at least providing conduits along the street frontages for future undergrounding, may be a requirement of this proposal. Advise/address. Provide the existing and proposed Floor Area Ratio and Impervious Surface Ratio on Sheet C4.0. Based on the submitted survey, show on all appropriate sheets the 1O-foot wide utility easement along a portion of the Gulfview Boulevard frontage. Address outdoor lighting. Provide the proposed colors of the building (color samples), including the glass. Provide a statement that all existing signage will be/has been removed. Proposed signage will need to be processed as a Comprehensive Sign program, since there are two attached signs. Signage must be architecturally integrated into design of the building. @ Additional landscaping for vertical relief may be required within the stormwater retention basin adjacent to South Gulfview Boulevard. Solid Waste: @ Shows shared double enclosure. Only one there now. Enclosure doesn't allow truck access. Need to relocate proposed double enclosure. Double enclosure detail needs to be shown on detail sheet. Alternative is to provide an on-site dumpster enclosure. jLand Resources: a) No comments. Fire: J ;)No comments. J Environmental: a) No comments. J Community Response: a) No comment. Landscapine:: a) The Plaza adjacent has an approved landscape plan, suggest matching plant materials to create a uniform look. (Planning Department to try to fmd plan). b) Suggest R.O.W. permit to allow landscaping in the area as designed with the plaza on the adjacent plaza. (Planning Department to try to find plan). c) Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. Staff may not support proposed reduction. d) Driveway entrance change along South Gulfview adjusts the landscape plan for the plaza, that plan will need to be modified to show the changes; and Submit revised plan for review. ~f) ~ g) ~ h) VI i) J j) 8. 9. 10. 11. NOTES: Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans and application material addressing all above departments' comments by Thursday, November 6, 2003, no later than noon. IIMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending cases I up for the next DRCIGulfview 700 SurfStylelFinal DRC Comments 1O.30.03.doc Page 2 of2 ~~c ~ffi" ~~~ r~ . ~~ ~~ ., . . I I ~ ~ ~ ~ z () ~ fu --I III ~ Z ~ lL. '- z () ~ - r~2 fu .~" id h~ ...... fiX", UJ "/ Q \!! ~ ~~ ~~ ~. n .. r~ .~ ~~ d . c , 01 3 ~~ h ; ~~ S~ ~ I l- => () Ifl n .. rot . .~ · h i1 ., > ~. cJ 2i N ~ . " ,~ .0> ~ 11 >-"\ >-!j! -' !l ~~ ~N 3 ~ LO L.{ Ul IS o:~ ~f F! ili 1"..0:.. iil ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 8 ~~ ~~ ! ~ >- \j~ \j~ 0 1 ~ ~~ ~~ 3 ~ r~ .~ L 01 . ~ ~~ ~. D~ )-li ~~ jg d~ 5~ ~f1 z () ~ fu --I III ...... III a ~. \-~ Ifl: ~ N~~ ~ ((jm LU -14: -'2Q ~~~ \O~ . lL ~~~ (t. ::)Ifl \08-1 r-\) z () ~ fu --I III :Q ~ @ I l- Ii () z <~ '" -.... a- <~ '-D ~..J ~ ..... '" '" ~o:: ~ ~ ~~ ~ Cl:: ~ < ~i>: '" E--< 0 U<"l 0 ~~ ~ E-- N - '" 0:: I- '" U~ ~ Cl:: i>: .... <;;; ~ O~ g ~<"l _ 00 i>: '-D _C1 '" ..;lo =--;; ~ ............... ,...,,...,,..., ~~~ . . - I I l< 'I ~ 5 I "- \D z ~ :L )-- ill )--It IU III 'ItZ i!' LtiJ ~ Cl ~ ~I~() xtn< Z~f-LLt: III '" \.l ll. ~ L ~;~~ \D z ~ :L ill ~ III li! ~ G~ ~F@ ~ ~~~~ F~~~ ~ill~ 0~~() ~~lll~ ~m~ ~~~~ ~~~~ D~:L ~ ifi :L ~ ~ LL LIl.. () ~() ~rr:t: ~~~() 0!Q.{() ~~~~ >- ~ "i ~ \) 8 l< ~ ~I -J "- l< ~ z < -J "- \D z IU is i!' G~iLl ~IIi() ~ . ~~~~ $ t)e~o " ~ Ff- in ~IU\) ~ \l1\l1- :;- )..'V'M ::>I1VM ?NO? -: "o-,~ _._-~_d~~~---?nl- , ~ .= I ~J ~::-:: ~f': I ~:::::~ I 1-1. . ~ ~ ~~::~::~ B ~ IU IL t....: ~~~ I ~ I'.::.. ~\)'" t- 60C .'::.: I2~ ~ I Ii g II '.:~.:.:.~ !~~ ~~~ , '::':'. ;:::Cl~)() dl :::: ~e< ',0 '.' a~~~ [,ot:: li!ii\lllQ ';:.: '::.: F; .:: "- ~ ::": ~ r- ...z \!l l- :;e: ~ IU f- z i!'~3 IU LLi!'ILl'l LL ()~~Cl ~ ~~~~ f- O. \.If-D(j : ~~~!l: ~ \!l z 9 ~ I I I.!) Z ~ ~ IL r-- '"-...:. ::::0 ----- ~ ~v.3L____- ~\D Z :;e: IUFIU 9Q i!' 3. ~~~~ ~ LL~ILl'lClf-IV() ()~~()z~rr:t: ~~Ff-Q~~l'l =F <inf-f-< \.If-D:L\.lz~~ ~ -a~~~B~tlj~ ~LLLLLLli!LL ~ ..Loi ~ ~."" ~~~ ~9. ~ 'o~ ;;]^/~a ).. V'M:>I~V d o.~g ''''''''''' 'NO",",Vd ,_ """"" ----ll~~" ~""'" ~~ Nv1m", 0 f- < () CEdv?saNvt -i (5 ~ f- !l:lll~ 9~ N~lii .- ~: lUaQ -1111~ ~ IDll- \f) > . ~It lL ~I~ Ii. :Jill \f)8 r--\l ~I ~ () z M~j 1 1 1 I I ~ --! I ~ I Z () I ~ I --! DI ~ ~i ~ >1 ~ ~I ~ 01 \f) [01 ~ ~I :s lUl~ it ~ I~ () -JI it :J ~1Ii ~i Z~ 1-1 01 \01 I t 1 1 ~ I ~ ifi IU ~ I IL ~~Gg ~~~Q F;:\.l't \.l~~~ ~!l:lll~ LL' \l1~ Il'l ~~ Z "0 () ~~. i= u.: X II :s \l1 9J1-1 ::l -Q <'14: \),!) -~ ;t, 8 '':.1S \) ~'~~3 ~ ~~b ........ .<(II)OC ~ I!i~ ~ ~~~R: ~ n~~ .....~ .. ....~ - ....... ~ <M ~ ~ .... '..J .. <J.l. ~ C:ci ~ Ul .... ~f-o X ~'" '" ~~ .. ~'" 0 u~ ~ ~u C Eo- <;; =f-o ~ u~ ~ ~~ 0 <'" ~ 0:< ~ .....Ul _ ....0: 'C mo .. ... , _ 10 (, "'0 N i:l..~ .... . . PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 100 S. Myrtle Ave., #220, 33756-5520 PO Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Phone: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)562-4755 ~ Clearwater o~ ~ APPLICATION FOR PAYIVIENT IN LIEU OF RETENTION NAME OF SITE: LOCATION:- PREPA..-.mD BY: DATE: Surf Style 700 S. Gulfview Blvd. Brian Barker 9/30/03 OWNER'S NAME: PHONE:- ADDRESS: Elis Anastasopoulos 727-461-9300 630 S. Gulfview Blvd. CONTRACTOR I REPRESENTATIVE (if any): Alex Plisko PHONE~ 727-442-7200 ADDRESS: 800 Drew St. Clearwater. FI 33755 REASON FOR REQUEST: No room on site for attenuation to be comvleted bv P. W A ( using rational formula LlQ= ..deJA) A= TOTAL AREA OF SITE (Divide sf. by 43,560) .......~~:U.~...~.f................ C= Cpre - Cpost (Weighted Runoff Coefficient After Development)................ Cpre = ((.95 x existing impervious area) + (.20 x pervious area)) I total area Cpost = ((.475 x existing impervious area)* + (.20 x pervious area)) I total area 1= 3.6 (based on 60 min. T.O.C.) AQ = ACIA ... ............. ..~!tl~ ..<.,~.o.O"'~)""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''' .... CITY OF CLEARWATER VOL. REQUIRED (A.Q x 3600) ...-.-.......-....-......-........-...+.-... = (Minimum SWFWMD first 1/2" or N24) ........................................................... VOLUME PROVIDED ................................................................................... = TOTAL VOL. TO. BE COMPENSATED BY p.LL.a. (volume required by City - vol. provided) . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. = P.LL.O. AREA total volume / 3ft. (assumed pond depth) ... ................. ...... = ESTIMATED LAND VALUE (125% of tax assessed value) .......................... = $ TOTAL Al\'IOUNT DUE (p.I.L.O. area x estimated land value) ................... = $ *use .95 for flood prone area .51 (ACRE) .95 .475 ,.,87 3132 926 941 c.f.s. c.f. c.r. c.r. 2191 730 43.8 31.974 c.r. sf. per s.r. Section 32.347 of the code o.fOrdinances o.fthe City allows developers to make payment in the form o.ffee-in-lieu- of charges and wave certain construction requirements; The owner understands and agrees that the Payment in Lieu of Retention must be made prior to the issuance of a Building Permit and the City reserves the right to use subjectfundsfor construction of City stormwater facilities as designated by the City Manager. Owner or Owner's Representative Date S: \WordltemplatelPayment in Lieu of Retention. doc revised: 1 0/14/98 . c:: I:&l .. ~ Ii! ~ ~. e;! ~>' ~-~ u~o ~~i t: ... u - ~ ~~....... (:: ,.. ~ . ~ :~~ t:i ':~-!. rn 210ie ~ s ~!~ ~t g~~i~! if ~~~ ! ~ : f~! :J vlE-:-;. ~ ~f~ ~ --- DO ) .~ .-en >to '+~ ~ ~ III .. ~ !l ~~h uf~1 ~ :c~~ ~=il ~~~I ~ot C) o I' I ~ A .3 Q. ,t .. . . ~ !ii~ ~ t ~ a 0 ~ ..0> <( o."oil:._....! III ~ 00> i g::~;;~: ~ 0 w'-.. l[) "' f- ~ .<< :i S I/)lXl (f) 5.1: 8 5.!(. ~=Ej'~!:ai ::J OJ ~e ~~ ~ w", <( o~l:"g.jto'ol 0:0 ~E~!(J c >->.Ci Cl:to -.J N JlJ lru 8 O~!~'O~iuj 11 2 0 "0 x ~ I- sO~,o~:;;;:l~ l:~ 0Cl: .... f- ~ !; Cl:W Z Cl: Z <( >.6-8 uiii-_ zEB a.f- z .... 0 il:I~~~~! o ~P' .. a. i= -'h .... I~ .. 0 .. zw ~~:S~io~t.; ~H~ '- ~ z Cl: 0 '" z 0 III ::J .... f- a. 0 '-' I=lI'l ~~a:iI!i~~ . ,:~ ~ lD III ........ 0 ~ u- ::l; .... III "'-' f- J!!;~~i!~i.. .!9~ 0 .. :::> '" f- ..U Z ~ 0 .... Z w I z 0 ::1 .... z I/) . ~.. 0 " OW ,. ::J i~:ii ~~:;!.; << VI '" a :::; ....9 W 0 0 Z LLIII ~: Cl u .. o III W Z W ~~nHH; z 0 f- ~ "f- '" ~ z Z 00> 0 -' g f- ilia 0 f- 2 0 0 .,.N ~~5].s~i~;:~ " 0 e w lD 0 .. 0 N g~~lj~gii'O ..~ C) ~ N ~I .f E W ""," ii ~~ @ .... sj:~ 2~~j o~ -l '" t'J .. . A ~"" E S F:f 1 .!:!.!:! ~11: ~G~'E ~ z- ~~l~ii~~l15 ~ L:J ::s a "If "'(-oe.-e ~!'I -' . / / ././ / / , , , , J' ~ /:/;:::~:: n. =-=:: G >- ' , ~ " ~ ~ \~~:::::j(:cl\~~~ ~ 0 i i ru-- m <( : L-' (I) I r, ......-~- -- --- - --- - --.....~--------. -..... ~-- - -------.....\......) Iv';::::::'=1=:-~- - ~~~~~~~~~~~t::~~:~~~~-t~~~~ -L LJ <( "<t- en N ~ .., EOd.a6J<lW-<;-ul600 'swepea 'Wd 6~:E:17:~O ~OIE~n:o '6"'p'\lS1l(';\S\fllV\a\l::lOlnV\NI~N3"S PinE'~as County Property APp.er Information: 1729 1505076003 O. Page 2 of5 17 / 29 / 15 / 05076 / 003 / 0110 06-0ct-2003 JiM SMi th , CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:17:10 Ownership InforMation Non-Residential Propert~ Address. Use. and Sales ANASTOPOULOS. ELIAS 1600 GULF BLUD ~ PHI CLEARWATER FL 33767-2924 COMparab Ie sales value as Prop Addr: 700 S GU L FUIEW BLUD of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Trac t : 260.02 sales froM 2001 - 2002: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/IMp Plat InforMation 6 /2.001 11. 452/ 9 1.000.000 (H) I 1961: Book 058 Pgs 012-013 11/1.999 10.717/1.984 745.000 (H) I 0000: Book Pgs - 8 /1.983 5.581/1.001 470.000 (H) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1.912 3.769/ 344 30.000 (Q) I 2003 Value EXEMPTIONS Jus t / Marke t: 500.000 HOMestead: 0 Ownership % .000 Historic : 0 Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 500.000 Tax ExeMpt %: .000 Other ExeMp t : 0 Taxable: 500.000 Agricultural: 0 2003 Tax InforMation Land InforMation District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearlllate r View: 03 Millage: 23.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 02 Taxes: 14.156.33 1) 120 x 112 35.00 13.680.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2003 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 11. 542.55 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 478.800 2003 taxes will be : 11. 542.55 Short Legal BAYSIDE SHORES BLK C. LOTS 11 3:12 Description Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi -scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p... 10/6/2003 Pinellas County Property APPler Information: 1729 150507600301 Page 3 of5 17 / 29 / 15 / 05076 / 003 / 0110 :01 06-0ct-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:17:09 COMMercial Card 01 of 1 IMproveMent Type: Offices Property Address: 700 S GULFUIEW BLUD Prop Use: 330 Land Use: 17 Structural Elements Foundation Floor SysteM Exterior Wall Height Factor Par ty Wall Structural FraMe Roo f FraMe Roof Cover Cabinet & Mill Floor Finish Interior Finish Partition Factor Special Footing Slab Above Grade COMMon Brick/Stone o None Hasonry Pillar&Steel Irregular Built Up/Hetal/Gyps Above Average Carpet COMbination Drywall o Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 6 Bath Tile Electric Shape Factor Quality Year Built Effective Age Other Depreciation Function Depreciation EconoMic Depreciation Floor and Ave rage Rectangle Ave rage Wall 1.977 15 o o o Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base A rea 1. 00 3.465 7) .00 0 2) Carpo rt .30 1. 30Z 8) .00 0 3) Canopy . Z5 694 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Features Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 3500SF 1. 00 3.500 0 3.500 999 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 3.500 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ~~[t][I]g]~ http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbinlcgi-scr3?0=I&a=l&b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &u=O&p... 10/612003 PineJlas County Property APp.er Information: 1729 150507600301 \ r---_ \ ...' -- I ----___ / 7 \' I ) I I I \ I 700 8,4 YWA . / BLV I ---------- 700 --, GUL~'I EW I 8[\1'0 I ~ ---.:::: !:--.-. 0 L~ 01 ()-t -------. - f ~ 691 (... .JLFVIEW BLVD 'J f) GUL'F~' IEW 8L va- 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph L-1 b :;] c:: ,j ~ I r-4-'2r-~ L~b~ I B Page 4 of5 't L 800 BAYW, BLVl http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p... 10/6/2003 f:~1 BAY I~'AY 8L [0 ~ OS076' _ --.-J Pin~l1as County Property APp.er Information: 1729 1505076003 O. Page 5 of5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information BacktQSs:archPag~ An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.f1. us/htbin/cgi -scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p... 10/6/2003 Pi~11as County Property APp.er Information: 1729 1505076003 O. Page 2 of5 17 / 29 / 15 / 05040 / 005 / 0130 06-0ct-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:18:47 Ownership InforMation Uacant P rope rt~ Use and Sales ANASTOPOULOS. ELIAS 1600 GULF BLUD ** PHI CLEARWATER FL 33767-Z9Z4 COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of J an 1, 2003, based on Census Trac t: Z60.0Z sales froM 2001 - 2002 : 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/IMP Plat InforMation 6 /Z.OOI 11. 45Z1 9 1.000.000 (H) I 1960 : Book 055 Pgs 017-018 11/1.999 10.717/1. 984 745.000 (H) U 0000: Book Pgs - 8 /1.983 5.581/1.001 470.000 (H) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1.97Z 3.7981 197 55.000 (Q) I 2003 Value EXEMP T IONS Just/Market: Z71.400 HOMestead: 0 Ownership % .000 Historic : 0 Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: Z71.400 Tax ExeMpt %: .000 Other ExeMp t: 0 Taxable: Z71.400 Ag r icu 1 tural : 0 2003 Tax InforMation Land InforMation District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 03 Mi llage : Z3.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 02 Taxes: 5.440.80 1) 80 x 117 35.00 8. 89Z. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) o x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2003 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 6. Z65. 30 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 311. ZZO 2003 taxes will be : 6. Z65. 30 Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. 6 UNIT B BLK E. LOT 13 AND 15FT Description UAC RD ON S Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi -click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p... 10/6/2003 Pi~ellas County Property APp.er Information: 1729 150507600301 Page 3 of 5 17 / 29 / 15 / 05040 / 005 / 0130 06-0ct-ZOOJ JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser Vacant Parcel Property Use: Z90 Land Use: 10 11:18:48 Vacant Extra Features Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 8140SF 1. 00 8.140 0 8.140 999 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VA LU E : 8.140 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ~~[t][f]~~ http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-c1ick?o=l&a=l&b= 1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p... 10/6/2003 Pirtellas County Property APp.er Information: 1729 150507600301 Page 4 of5 \ I 65--- ~ L-1 '-. c -"-.-J I r--- 4'?F2 L- ")L-'~ +-- A L- ~~~ I ( --------.. i:::;. / ,.. '. r....o/ l l 8 ~,~EW .vo ------ 700 ;1 GIJLFVLEW BLVD fal BAYWAY BLVD \ ~ ~OSOqo-1 :::---.. ~ r- - ::-l I 05076 '---~ G91C GULr:-V IE'W BLVD .. .. ~. .. , , , 71D GULrVIEVv BLVD 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi -click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p... 10/612003 Pi~ellas County Property APp.er Information: 1729 150507600301 Page 5 of5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbinlcgi-click?0=1&a=1&b=1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &u=O&p... 10/6/2003 . .> " CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, December 16, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following Level Two Application requests: NOTE: All persons wishine: to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetine:. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant. staff. neie:hborine: property owners. etc. will be placed on a consent ae:enda and approved by a sine:le vote at the bee:innine: of the meetine:. 1. (cont. from 10/21/03) Robert Hupp & Allen McMullen are requesting a flexible development approval to pennit a reduction in the front (north) setback from 35 ft to 15 ft (to pavement) and from 35 ft to 16 ft (to generator pad) along Charles Avenue, a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 98 spaces (5/1,000 sq ft) to 97 spaces (4.9/1,000 sq ft), an increase in building height from 30 ft to 38.5 ft, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.C and to vacate 242 feet of Allen Avenue right of way (Proposed Use: A 9,560 sq ft medical clinic.) at 3080 Allen Avenue., Acker's Sub, Blk 4, Lots 4-7 & 12- 15, part of Lots 8-11. FLD2003-08037 2. Griffin International Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages on a parcel of land contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residentially zoned property in the Zoning Atlas, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C. (Proposed Use: Alcoholic beverage sales within a 2,100 square-foot tenant space located in an existing shopping center) at 1575 S. Hie:hland Ave., Sec. 23-29-15, M&B 34.31. FLD2003-09042 3. G T Leisure Corp. / Roe:ers Beach Development (Villa del Sole of Clearwater Beach, LLC) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit 6 attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction in the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 1 ft (to pool and decking) and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and Preliminary Plat approval for 6 lots [Proposed Use: Six attached dwellings (townhomes)) at 181 Brie:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub. No.2, Lots 20 & 21 and riparian rights. FLD2003- 09046 4. Island Key Development. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval for a multi-use dock for the construction/reconstruction of 11 slips, dock and 4 catwalks with boardwalk along the seawall for a residential condominium complex, with a reduction of the side (north and south) setbacks from 18 ft to 16 ft (to catwalks) and from 18 ft to zero ft (to boardwalk) and an increase of the width of the dock from 75 percent of the lot width (135 ft) to 100 percent of the lot width (180 ft), under the provisions of Section 3-601 (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock of 11 slips for Island Key Condominiums) at 692 Bayway Blvd N., Bayside Sub. No.5, Elk A, Lots 21, 22 & 23 and riparian rights. FLD2003-09044 5. BelCal Properties, LLC are requesting a flexible development approval to permit retail sales (fmancial services) with deviations to allow direct access to a major arterial street (Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate, primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C. (Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (GTE Federal Credit Union), in addition to a proposed distribution center and offices) at 1750 N. Belcher Rd., Clearwater Industrial Park, a part of Lot 12. FLD2003-09047 6. Everybody's Tabernacle. Inc. & Homeless Emere:ency Proiect. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a residential shelter of eight units/beds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 ft to 17 ft (to stairway ramping) and from 25 ft to 23 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.B, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted a residential shelter of eight units/beds at 1215 N. Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 ft to 15 ft (to stairwell) and from 25 ft to 23 ft (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 4 ft (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 8 ft (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2- 704.B) (Proposed Use: Residential shelter of 8 units/beds) at 1215 & 1211 N. Betty Ln., Pinebrook Sub. No.2, Blk E, Lots 15 & 16. FLD2003-09048 . . \ 7. Homeless Emerl!encv Proiect. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a residential shelter of 4 beds with a reduction of the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 it to 4.46 ft (to pavement), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction of the side (west) landscape buffer from 12 ft to 10ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Residential shelter) at 1003 Carlton St., C.E. Jackson's Sub., Blk 3, Lot 11 less rd. FLD2003-09049 8. Moorinl! Capital Fund. LLC (Family Resources, Inc.) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a residential shelter (16 beds for youth in crisis) and a social/public service agency in the Institutional District with a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 8.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 9.5 ft (to pavement), a deviation to allow the residential shelter 900 ft (instead of 600 ft) from a transit line and a deviation to allow a social/public service agency adjacent to residentially zoned property, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1204.A, and a reduction of the landscape buffer along the side (west) property line from 12 ft to 9.5 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Residential shelter (16 beds) and a social/public service agency) at 1615 Union St., Sec. 02-29-15, M&B 12.05. FLD2003- 09051 9. Elias Anastopoulos is requesting a flexible development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 2 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to ramp), from 10 ft to 1 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 3 ft (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from 5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft (38 spaces) to 3.19 spaces per 1,000 sq ft (23 spaces) and a reduction in the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from 5 ft to 2 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: A 7,610 sq-ft retail sales and services building) at 700 S. Gulfview Blvd., Bayside Shores, Blk C, Lots 11 & 12 and Bayside Sub. No.6 Unit B, Blk E, Lot 13 and 15 ft vac rd on S. FLD2003-09045 10. ABR Plymouth Plaza. Ltd. (Tampa Bay Water/Jerry L. Maxwell, GM) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit an office building with an increase of building height from 30 ft to 55 ft and a reduction of the side (east) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-1004.F. (Proposed Use: 37,000 sq ft three-story office building) at 2575 Enterprise Rd., Sec. 30-28-16, M&B 34.11. FLD2003-09053 11. South Gate Park. Inc. (Tree Tops at Druid) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the side (west) setback from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), an increase of building height to allow perimeter parapets an additional 6 ft (from roof deck) and a deviation from the requirement to screen off-street parking from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-304.G, and Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (10 units, five per building)] at 2525 Druid Rd., Sec. 18-29-16, M&B 44.41 and Sever Park, Lot 3 less E 200 ft. FLD2003-08038 12. Dean C. & Anita J. Carley are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the rear (east) setback from 15 it to zero ft as part of a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Residential deck) at 1601 Sand Kev Estates Ct., The Moorings of Sand Key, Lot 30. FLD2003-09043 13. Michael & Stefanie Markham are requesting an appeal of the decision of a Level One (Flexible Standard Development) that approved an application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B (FLS2003-08038) (Owners: Jeffrev A. & Ambrvn E. Finstad) at 2959 Eal!le Estates Cir. W., Eagle Estates, Lot 38. APP2003-00003 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board if person requesting such demonstrates that slbe is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to . . , three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCQMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093. Ad: 11/30/03 .. . . · CLINKSCALE, ROBERT M FL INT IMP FUND TRE BA YSIDE CONDO ASSN INC C/O BEL CREST CONDO INC 800 BAYWAY BLVD 800 BAYWAY BLVD # 10 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2615 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2609 SHERRARD, HENRY J TRE CLINKSCALE, ROBERT M WALDEMAR, MARGARET M HODGE, HARRY E TRE 800 BAYWAY BLVD # 10 1401 GULF BLVD # 116 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2832 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3012 SIFAKIS, TARYN NICHOLSON, FAY A AMOS, THOMAS E 6280 SHACKELFORD TER NICHOLSON, CHARLES W AMOS, FRANCES C ALEXANDRIA VA 22312 - 948 RIVERSIDE RIDGE 4079 AQUARINA ST TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - W ATERFORD MI 48329 - 2117 8800 MC CANNON, NORMAN J JR HODGE & SUN GETAWAY HODGE, HARRY MC CANNON, MARY T 800 BAYWAY BLVD # 20 SHERRARD, HENRY TRE 90 NORTH ST CLEARWATERFL 33767- 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 204 AGAWAMMAOI001-1322 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3012 SCHULMAN, SUSAN H AMOS, THOMAS E SHERRARD, HENRY J TRE SCHULMAN, HELEN P AMOS, FRANCES C HODGE, DONNA M TRE 210 CARYL WAY 4079 AQUARINA ST 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #204 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2265 W A TERFORD MI 48329 - 2117 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 3012 SHERRARD, HENRY J TRE WALDEMAR, GEORGE FURLETTI, ROBERT HODGE, HARRY E TRE WALDEMAR, DEBORAH FURLETTI, HELEN A 845 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 204 316 FOX HILL DR 182 LENOX AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3012 BAITING HOLLOW NY 11933 - NEW MILFORD NJ 07646 - 2618 9506 GASIK, FORREST M AMOS, THOMAS E MOORINGS TOWN HOMES II 18 JAMES ST AMOS, FRANCES C 9100 BAYHILL BLVD BEVERLY MA 01915 - 4079 AQUARINA ORLANDO FL 32819 - W A TERFORD MI 48329 - 2117 ISLAND KEY DEV BURNABY WELCH CORP CLEARWATER, CITY OF 19535 GULF BLVD STE B 18975 E HIGHWAY 40 PO BOX 4748 INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 - SILVER SPGS FL 34488 - 6725 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS POLITIS, GREGORY C 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATERFL 33767- POLITIS, GREGORY 965 S BA YSHORE BLVD SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 4217 SEA W AKE MOTEL LTD 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2643 ANASTOPOULOS, ELIAS 1600 GULF BLVD # PHI CLEARWATER FL 33767 - E & A INC 1600 GULF BLVD # PHI CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 ANASTOPOULOS, ELIAS 1600 GULF BLVD # PHI CLEARWATER FL 33767 - .. .. LANE CL WR L TD PARTNERSHIP 1 LANE CENTER 1200 SHERMER RD NORTHBROOK IL 60062 - 4500 WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WARNER HOSPITALITY 706BAYWAYBLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BA YW A Y BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2609 MASSELL, GEORGE M II 716 BAYWAY BLVD # 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2664 ROANE, DOUGLAS C 716 BAYWAY BLVD # 5 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2664 ANTHONY, CRAIG W ANTHONY, BARBARA B 724 BAYWAY BLVD # A-I CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2611 . BEL CREST CONDO INC 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2609 WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATERFL 33767- WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATERFL 33767- WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATERFL 33767- CLEARWATER POINT TOWNHOUSE CONDO ASSN 716 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2664 MC GEE, JOHN P PO BOX 3455 CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 8455 BESSINGER, ROBERT N BESSINGER, ELAINE A 716 BAYWAY BLVD # 6 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2664 LA VDAS, DIMITROS LA VDAS, THALIA 724 BAYWAY BLVD # A-2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2611 · WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATERFL33767 - WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BA YW A Y BLVD CLEARWATERFL 33767- WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WARNER, SCOTT A KELLAN, PATRICIA A 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATERFL 33767- HANSELMAN, MARGARET M 206 PALMETTO RD CLEARWATERFL33756-1430 HORNE, THOMAS L PO BOX 3009 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8009 ISLAND CLUB CONDO ASSN INC 20001 GULF BLVD INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 2472 CASEY,PAULAR 724 BAYWAY BLVD # A-3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2612 ~ HOUGEN, THERESE Y TRUST 724 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767- SKTEL INC 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2642 Mr. Alex Plisko Plisko Architecture, P A 800 Drew St. Clearwater, FL 33755 - SAUNDERS, WILLIAM R SAUNDERS, SHIRLEY M 724 BAYWAY BLVD # B-2 CLEARWATER FL 33767- SKTEL INC 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 Clearwater Beach Association Pres. Mr. David MacNamee 827 Mandalay Ave. Clearwater, FL 33767 -DETTY, G WILLIAM TRE IVERSON, BRITT L C/O BANK OF AMERICA PRIVATE BK PO BOX 479 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0479 Elias Anastasopoulas 630 S. Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33767 ) . . . ~ !i'i~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ..0> <( ~ g~b.frg15 0 UI ! CO> LO ~ 0 ~ L.J'- <0 >- -: ~ :0 D:!OO:!!i,$ .~ ~ g :s l/)a) (f) ~=s.r!~:u"i if :J Ii ! 5~ OJ <- ~>- ~8 <( ;~;tAg~:.l 2ii " " 0::>- EI -' N ~~J.;'O~Efij .l/ = :to 11 ~ 0 x >- I- = o~oZ.:;~1:; ~~~ "0 00:: W >- ~ ~ o::w Z 0:: Z <( >00.-8 oa.i-_ 263 0.>- z w 0 ii:!~~~~E 2~'i\ ... ... a. ;= w I~ 0 ... zw !-:.$~tO~~~ ~uH 0:: z 0:: 0 0:: Z 0 ~...' - W UI :J ...... >- a. Cl '-' 1=11) ~~~lill~~i ,::~ lD UI ww Vi ~ '" 0::-' >- u- Jt~;b.2i!~g . => w ~ ...u z w w Z w .r~'i 0:: 0 I 0 ... z 0 ~ W Z Vl . i" 0 0 Q OW ::l! Cl :J 2 i!i ~C::f;;ii N III - " :J wQ w Z ...l/J ;; Cl u <( OUl W Z w 3:o.--;~~ ~ Z 0 >- ....... 0:: Z Z 0 00> je'li--- fi 0 -' g I:J '" 0 0 .N o:2~!H~~ P ~ W lD UlO ... N N ::i:g C) N ~I ~':l'8~t~li'O .. E t!,! w ijl~~~~: aX -l ~" .!r u~l1i. z- ~ :SEg~f~ .. . 0: . ~ Ill!' ~ E! ;:: ~!.~ '< Iil ~ ~:;:~ . >-~. en .""~ c::~ ~~CJ~e! < z>" ;:II!; 0" ~uE ~~ffi~~~ u 5:8 g ~~i~l r:..~; ll' l5~~ :t ~ o ~ }*! >- :J fl4E.,,:,; t:: ... ~ ~ 4!~ u ... ~ --- DO J .~ .-co >(0 '+~ ....... ~ o o " . tIl A ~ ~ ,t \ /-: / / /,/ // <:( !f ~ };:/ ~ ~ /:,/ < :: 11. ~ :: . . >- ' . ~ " z \\, ~ o~'~:i-c~l~~~ <C( : L-' ...._~--- --.. --. ~ -"'l.,.~.~. un ~.......~-- - ------ U\.......) C~=::=:: 1=:::"- - ~~~~~~~~~~~~C~:~~~.~:-t~~~ -c (; /JIo. "V \ \ f;'Xl'a6JaW-S-ulllua 'swepea '~d 6~:tV: ~o ~OIB~1l0 '6Mp....S91:\SlfU 'v'IaV:)Olm''\NI~N3rs j ~ ~ 1 . S ~ . 0:: ':Z; 1ft ~ ~ ~ ~H :: q ~ ~~i .- ,..&:- ~ i '6'1 D::: t: .. ~ :SOD~u <~t:: ;::II~~:c;:: ~y~ e~:5~~L Co>:;;8 ~.,~ ,rill e ~~~!~g l'o.::i!j "0 ..l.'< o Ie- ts: >- ~ :g~ t: ... ~ ~f.'~ Co> .. o ~ ~ ~ ii~~ ~; ~ ~ ig!tf~:gi1 ~ ~ :;o':rJ!!:~ :~ ~=~!~e:~"i r~ OMaoltZtool 11'" 5~~lU~~;-:O Jt I . !2~ '0 .iU I 12 :.~ic5ial ~ l:~ ~'i:!~~:s~! 2~~ l.!:S!i .o.6~~ ~1jl:; eg:s:l:;~~ ~:}~~ 2~"i~ ":~~ lo.-' i..~ ~t~~:i:Ji.! :~:t ijt:!!1f~~.g . [j r;i~.!ic~ic:~ ~~ ~~~'B~il:e;i\ ~.9 EUE ~'8ll'O .. ~ ~l'2 ~~::.~~I ~~ ~J!~J~:~a~{ a ~~l~~i~5~15 ~ . 0 :il 0 zEe ~ 0 0 '" 0 ~ 0 o ~ '- ... -' ... <> III . o z w o W -.J e'i <D ,. :> z " o o --' <D w z ::; 1:1' ::> ::; ~>- "'.... :tu 0", "'... Q..... < I~ '" << ...w "'-' <0 8~ aUi <.... 0i5 r',"' 1:::1 l:::1 LiJ g ~ X i q EI ..01 C01 w........ 1/)00 50 w........ a::""' o ro (f)L() ~CX) --.IN ~ <( zw o o ti~ Z ~I Z Io.IJ) 00", ....N N-:::-I i .~ x w Z Z < i? .... z w ,. w W 0:: <> < z o >= < z (.') Ui w a <> z Z o N III III ... 0:: a ~ III .... ~ ::i >- .... u w z ::; w z o N .... o -' ~ ... . Q ,; @~ WI' z- 286A .. , , , "---.. , , , ,- , , , , , / / / / / / / / , / , / 'v ~ ;i .~~ iii"'; ao ~ (J) ~ '8 . I ~ ,..... ~ / N ..... ~ ~ a 0 ,.,.. ~ ~ () , f4 0 ~ ------ 0 ....~~ at ~ \. <( lD ,..... N ,.. .1 " .. . r .. 1< , (__or~ ...~~~LOF rll~~ L~~L~j!tttif"~~",~.~;~ ~~~ I ~........ "''''-:!!~,\ 1/ ~ ~ '" ~~~~ ~ '" "'l_- - -!Il\ 101" .., ........~ ..c;.~ ~lt ..... : ';0 - ;:;::. ~ ~~~~ -- ,"~;lt ~~$:~,;it\~"" "'''''~~?lTHtA_~~'' ~<rLO.P CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW December IS, 2003 Mr. Alex P1isko Plisko Architecture, P A 800 Drew Street Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-09045 -700 South Gu1fview Boulevard Dear Mr. Plisko: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 16,2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to four feet (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to two feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to ramp), from 10 feet to one foot (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (36 spaces) to 3.19 spaces per 1,000 square feet (23 spaces) and a reduction in the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five feet to two feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-S03.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-S03.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANKHlBlJARD, COMMISSIONER * BILl. JONSON, COMMISSIOKER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 4' ttI~. ~ , December 18, 2003 Plisko - Page Two Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any building permit; 3. That an agreement with the abutting property owner for joint use of the dumpster on the adjacent property is required, acceptable to the Solid Waste Department, prior to the issuance of any building permits; 4. That, in lieu of stormwater attenuation, payment be made to the City, in an amount determined by the City, prior the issuance of any building permits; 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontages be completed prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy; 6. That signage meet the requirements of Code and a Comprehensive Sign Program be processed for more than one attached sign. Any freestanding signage shall be limited to monument-style, not to exceed six feet in height designed to match the color and material of the building; and 7. That, prior to the issuance of any building permits, the landscape plan be revised to change the Natal palm shrubs to a suitable plant, acceptable to the Planning Department. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (December 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy ofthis letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 1, 2004 (14 days from the date of this Development Order). , ~' '" " \ December 18, 2003 Plisko - Page Three If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727- 562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myc1earwater.comlgov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, . ~~ Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning Director \IMS5c\PDSIPlanning DeparlmentlC D B\FLEXiPending cases I Up for the next CDBIGu/fview 700 Surf Style (T)\Gu/fview 700 Development Order.doc