FLD2003-01005
)
.
e.
~ Clearwater
-~~
~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater. Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICA nON:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
r7' SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
c:( SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2)' stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ tJlA
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
RECE1V
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: City of Clearwater
MAILING ADDRESS: 610 Franklin Street. Clearwater. FL 33756
E-MAIL ADDRESS: whanson@clearwater fl.com PHONE NUMBER: ( 727) 562-4334
CELL NUMBER: ( 727) 224-7360 FAX NUMBER: ( 727) 562-4328
PROPERTY OWNER(S): City of Clearwater
(Must include ALL owners)
AGENT NAME(S): TBE Group
MAILING ADDRESS: 380 Park Place Boulevard, Suite 300, Clearwater, FL 33759
E-MAIL ADDRESS: bzarlenga@tbegroap.com PHONE NUMBER: ( 727) 531-3505
CELL NUMBER: ( 727) 639-5569 FAX NUMBER: ( 727) 539-1294
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 1720 Overbrook Drive
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: As shown on enclosed boundary survey (see attached).
(if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal)
PARCEL NUMBER:
PARCEL SIZE: 1. 59 acres. 69,2?4 SF
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: Fire and Rescue Station - Single Story - 12.300 SF +/-
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Reduction in number of parking s pac e s ~ ~)i ~~ >r~~~:())CJX.
(include ali requested code deVIations; e.g. reduction In required number of parking soaces, specific use, etc.)
increase height of solid PVC fence from 6 feet to 8 feet.
f-ttj 1 B [U03
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revisedp~ING DEPARTMENT
CITY UI- vLI::AF{WATER
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-use additional sheets as necessary
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comcrehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
1" ,
J,
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE I , NSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREV USL Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO --L (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
o SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is locatep. 1 . d . d t b . h . h th . d t' 1 1
The proposed deve opment 1S eS1gne 0 e ln armony W1t e reS1 en 1a sca e
and use of materials as much as possible given the nature of the facility.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
The surrounding prooerty is liqht industrial and residential. The proposed
development is in keeping with the tone and tenor of the neighborhood and should
encouraqe similar development.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use. ()
The prooerty development is a Public-Safety Facility Fire Rescue Facility and
so will improve the health and safety of the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is desiQ.ned to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed f1re stat10n will have a staff of only 9 people which may double
only at shift change. There is no expectation that there will be any more
traffic qenerated beyond this.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Community character of the area is liqht industrial and residential. The proposed
development uses residential materials and scales.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjac~t properties.
Hours OT operation are 24 hours/day, 7 days/week - The building has been placed
to sheild truck and siren noise from the residential area to the south upon the
fire rescue vehicles exitinq the facility. Also, proposed is an ~ foot high PVC
privacy fence along the south property line.
o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE IN FILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) _ Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use. intensity
and development standards.
The buildinq height is dictated by the equipment required to fit under it, and
on-site parkinq is limited by area constraints. The increased height of the
fence is an improvement to the already existing 8 foot dilapidated metal fence.
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
The proposed development will reduce insurance rates and fire rescue response
times in the vicinit The current
property is valued at ml lone
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
Fire rescue stations are a public. civic use and are permitted in the City of
Clearwater.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
Adjacent land use is typically residential and liqht industrial and all
adjacent land uses will be serviced by the proposed fire rescue facility.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
This site was chosen after an exhaustive search for suitable property.
Studies in fire orotection dictated this qeneral location.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
Firp prntection response times are expected to be cut dramatically in the
immediate vicinity of the proposed development.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive in fill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Building mass is broken into smaller portions to more closely relate to
residential surroundinqs.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
irTJm~diate vicinity of the pijrcel wpposed for develoP,rTlel1l a"q the City of Clearwater as jl whple.
He1qnt Var1anCe 1S a1ctated by ne1gnt ot equ1pment to De housed - off-street
parking is provided for designed shift-changes only.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-s\riEl,t parking in the immedi"lte vicinity .of parcel proposed fqr development.
There Wl I be no snarea parK1ng agreement.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
The building is not in the tourist disctrict or downtown district.
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL: EQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
'if TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
if LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; (~.a.,r..y ~ ~"'.:.:.\c~c.J c..,<,j;\.r....d-\,j."\ pk\r\c;" - c...v-~.- She~+ ')
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie, Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the
submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles, The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved; Nj A
'fIf' GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); (flIA)
COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
~
F.
~
)l
A
:;:
,.
"-
):,
..L
L
'"
~
~
SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feel), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses. and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section3-201(D)(i)andlndex#701};__ j -. .. ~'_n~16:
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks
~
L
~
~
l
x
;oil,.,
~
~
~
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.SR,); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses
x
jl.
".(
X
~
~
A..
)(
L
o
REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 'h X 11) and color rendering if pOSSible
~
L
)0:
:,.;
KIA
2:.-
)l,.
;0:..
'X:
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stonmwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs:
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size. canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
. G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUB
~ LANDSCAPE PLAN:
;.. All existing and proposed struc
~ Names of abutting streets;
..L Drainage and retention areas i
- Delineation and dimensions of
...L Sight visibility triangles;
~ Delineation and dimensions of
A- Proposed and required parking
..::l.- Existing trees on-site and imm
required tree survey);
.L Location, size, description, spe
common names;
-1- Typical planting details for tree
protective measures;
- Interior iandscaping areas hat
f'Ji" percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous devel
.2L Irrigation notes
~ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLA
0 IRRIGATION PLAN (required
0 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSC
H. STORMWATER PLAN SU
4-202.A.21)
ri STORMWATER PLAN includi
.1L Existing topography extending
.:L Proposed grading including fi
2L All adjacent streets and munic
~ Proposed stormwater detentio
..x.. Stormwater calculations for a
~ Signature of Florida registere
0 COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY
(SWFWMD approval is requir
0 COpy OF STATE AND COU
I. BUILDING ELEVATION P
Required in the event the applicati
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevel
./ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWIN
crI REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIO
possible) as required
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SI
0 All EXISTING freestanding and att
to remain.
rd All PROPOSED freestanding and
i:J Comprehensive Sign Program ap
a Reduced signage proposal (8 Y:z X
Page 5 of 7 - Flexib
.
.
MITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
tures;
ncluding swales, side slopes and bottom eievations;
all required perimeter landscape buffers;
all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
spaces;
ediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on
cifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
s, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions. soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
ched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage. expressing in both square feet and
opment approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
N to scale (8 Y:z X 11) (color rendering if possible)
for Level Two and Three applications)
APE PROGRAM application, as applicable
BMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
ng the following requirements:
50 feet beyond all property lines;
nished floor elevations of all structures;
ipal storm systems;
n/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
ttenuation and water quality;
d Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
ed prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
NTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS. if applicable
LAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
on includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
opment Project or a Residential Infill Project.
GS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions. colors and materials
NS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y:z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
GNS I Section 3-1806)
ached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
attached signs; Provide details including location. size, height, colors, materials and drawing
plication, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
11) (calor), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Ie Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
a Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Deveiopment Code for exceptions to this reql,lirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I. the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best oi my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
~~~C'~
Signature of property owner or representative
).c).)l..{
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
City of Clearwater
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
1720 Overbrook Drive (previouslv known as "Central FLA Used AIJtn Pi'lrtc;lI)
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Construction of Northwest Fire and Rescue Station No. 51
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
TBE Group
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater. Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
City of Clearwater
Property Owner ~/~ C--' ;ft;~~
Property Owner
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the Sta,te of Florida, on this
r""l"",*^/ , ;:l 003 personally appeared RtJvJJ4Y>d E. H .uqJt;(
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
q)}\
V'~
My Commission Expires: Ya..", )7/ )Ov If.
~\""'t1U"""'l
'1t.",... ~a~ne Hat} 'II""
~~. ......... ~o~ ~
~ .~. SION /:':~" ~
J ~ .0 1"~27~' ~
1J q ~ .. ~ .:j~ ' <''tL~ ..
;... ~ - ~ : ~ dav ot "'-:
1rrsi _.4 .*
who having beEl!! Ir duly sworn .
~ 'Z ~ #CC905979 : ;S
'--0- .~
~ ::;.\ .. effi ~
~~...:''by~~.A,'''Q~
;" -;. .0 "'-lII-lffl\I<";. ~~
'III/ Ie ST"; "",
"""'11111\\"'"
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
STA TE OF FLORIDA,
S:IPianning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment review\2002 Formslcomprehensive infi" application 2002.doc
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infilf Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
1212/18/21211213
1219:19 72756.
\....OrpOrale ranty Deed
ENG
.
\
This Indenture, made this 31st: day of October
A.D. 2002 Between
CE~RAL FLORID~ USED AUTO PARTB, INC.
whose post office address is:
a corporation existing under the Jaws of tl)e
State of FLORIDA
CIT~ OF CLEARWA~ER
,Grantor 8.lId
whose post office address is: P . O. :BOX 4748
CLEARWAT~R, Ft 33758-4746
Grantee.
Witnesseth, that the sald Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of ( Ten &, NO/10 0 )
Dollars, to It In hand paid by the said Grantee, the receipt whereof is bereby acknOWledged, bas granted, bargained and
sold to the said Grantee lorever, tbe following deacrjbecj land, situate, lying and being in the COUXllY of
Pinellaa , State off/lorida. to wit
SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Subject to covenants, restrictiona and easements of record. Subject
also to taxe~ for 2002 and subsequent years.
Parcel Identificqtion Number: 03/29/lS/00000/430/0S00
And tbe said Grantor does hereby fullywarranl the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful
claims of all persons wl)omsoever.
In Witness Whereof, the said Grantor has caused lIJ.is instrument to be e;x:ecuted in its name by Its duly
authorimi officer and caused ita corporate seal to be affi;x:ed the day and year fil'st above written.
USED A~O P~RTS,
By:
(COlporate Sea.I)
S~te of
County of
Florida
Pinellas
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 31st day of October
J~CK VASILARoS, ~RESIDENT
of CEN'I'RAL FLORIDA, USED AUTO P~RTg, INC.
, :2 0 02 ,by
a COrporation eXisting under the laws of the State of
He/She is personally known to me or hu produced
CWD-l
6/99
. on behalf of the colporatiol~.
a . (cation.
PRE~ARED BY, RECORD & RETURN TO:
L~DIA M~SSINA - File #92103
EPIC DIVISION
Firet American Title Insurance
7360 Bryan Dairy Road, Suite 200
Largo, FL 33776
I l... NIi!SSlN"
~ NoWyPullio,st&itolAll!l<la
My Comm. E)!I). Jan. S. 20116
. ',' ^I"'(\A?n4f\
PAGE 1212
02/18/2003 09:19
72756.5
ENG
~
->
SCHEDULE
A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
"
.
PAGE El3
That Part of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 3, To~nShiP 29
S, Range 15 E,described as folloWSt Beginning in the W st
boundary of the public thoroughfare known as "Betty La e" at a
point which bears N 89036'07" W, 68.91 feet from the Scorner
of said SW 1/4 of SE 1/4; and running thence on the s~e
bearing, along the south boundary of said SW 1/4 of th~ SE 1/4,
694.24 feet, thenCe N 006'21." Wt513.94 feet to the Soubhwesterly
. I
boundary of sa1d thoroughfare known as "Betty Lane", tHence S 530
26'09 II E, along said l:loundary 838.9 feet to the heginn:iJng of a
curve in said thoroughfare boundary, the Chord of whiCh curve
I
bears S 47Q55'51." E from this point, thence following aaid curve
along the Betty Lane thoroughfare boundaryt 28.62 feet ito the
Point of Beginning.
"
I,
I I.
II
.
.
Z!q', Pu<>......."''"~_ (I)
~98-"<!l.L-(,a:.Ll XW:l . ~!a80-&i!l'.L-U.i!l'.L) "Hd UIl7II 'lBI.lIlIIIImO
~31~";;'<?~~~~~ ~
DNINNV"1d " DNI"':I;!NIDN3 - 3Io1nl.::>3.uH~l=ru' I I
$1:cl}:::.:il I I 3roB:I '3HI:J ~ 0
Y3.1.VMalV31O:IO .wO ~
. . IIlI I I ~
I I I I !
~ n ~ \I H ! 11 ! ,IF:: ,::c J ~st NOUVlS 3l:ll:ll.S3MH1l:lON i I I
:,* I j I I I f w r I .
I . I I I .
t
~
~
~
I
I
I
I
t tr tt
~~ h tl
i! I i II
~ I I II z
!~ I! I I ~
Ii I ~a I I ~
~~ I '. I I w
i ~I di ~ ~
t tr n
I I ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ IJ
. . I . .
I I I II
I I II
I II
.1 I II
~ ~ II
II i
~ ~
~r
M "I
.p
~ !
"''''
I
I
I I
~~ I!
~ II
il i ~
~~
a~
i.!I'
~
~
~~ I
Ii I-
Ii I.. i~
i I~I ~I
II~ ~l
I~I ~'"
.~ '
I-
I
I
I
I
I
~
,
I' 1 I
I II I I
I II I I
I II I I
1 II 1 II
I I J1 I it
~~ ~
~,~~,
.OC-.~
OO.LOL~1ilOOO "ON
~.
~:.
, -~
~ ~. ~ ]
~ ~~ ~ ~"
~. ~- ~ ~~
~,m
~0
~ g2
~ -~
. ~ ~ i~
~ ~~ ~ ~~
~ -I ..~
~~. ~ ~~
a ~~~ ~ -~
: ~i~ ~ g~
~ ~ ~ i~
~-",:
~p
L
i!i ~
~
~ ~ ~ ttt
~ : 8 ~ ~~~
~
~ "
~ ~ " ~
~~ ~ ~ ~
. . N ~
! ;; !! is
~ - ffi -
~ ~ !i 'i ~
" ~ ~ . .
..: "'..;.:..;
~
- il
i
:.f
.~
!~~
~g;~
~!~
q~~
~ t;;t;;~
di~
g~
~~
H.,
~H
.' 0
0; g
~~ ~
==n~
~~~~~~
~~~M~
~~~~~~
~=~~~~
.;,;
~~
~i
~~
o
~ ;
.. ~
- ~~ ~
!! "Ilo.
~ ~~~>S~
S m~~~
. Il~._~~
~ ~~S~~.
.iil~~~~
"
.;
d Ii
~~.~-
d d 2 ~
qH~
~ d n ~
~
t;
~
~ ~
~dn
e
m~w~~
. . , . ..8..
~~.:;~~~::.~~
~-~
~~lllIM~I~dli~: bll:1i
~~;~~~~~~
~:'';~;:;i:i~~ DO
~t
~~
~ ~i
~
~ < ~ ~~
ii ~ ~ ~ ~~
I ~U .~~~ !!~
. .~ .~~ >-
'il~~ ~.i~
i m~!~~il; ~i
~ ~~iii~~ldi;t~ ~i1
"
"'~oen<al. XY~ SWI1oW1l..u:t
Kltt """"'1:1 .~
llOl:_'-w>llDdOK
=1l
(d~
~ I
~O
NYld 311S
~Illl
l~4S
lS 'ON NOl1Y1S
3n::>S3H aNY 3HI:I 1S3MH1HON
~I~!l
P~OJd
~
~
~~!
~~~
~!;(i
~~
~~~
:c'lltS
090
:g~
~:::J<
;::~l!!:
~~~
".0
~gi
~!!il:5
2'
~ ~s
a ffi~ 0
:. ~~ . if
~ ~~ ~ U
0; ~ ~~~ b ~~
~ ~ iii~~ ~~ ~:
o ~ ~" ~ ~~
z . ~il~ ~~ f~
:3 ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~
'" ffi -.- ~o ~~
~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~
- ~ ~~ii1 .~ ~~ ~
--
-,-
~-:M"1i:ua--~--------
; ;
. _ ll~d~ I"
~!nl;~;; 1
-I ~nUal3 .,1.'$
i ~;~ ~ .~.,
u ~u ~ ~7
I~
1
I
';
1
I
"/"-"
1
I
1
.. 1
=-___x~
'~., " '. ,: I"
....,;).'
~Ji
i i
. m
~I i ~ ~: ~ I I
c:>"!~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ is ~ ~ ;'
~I ~ I ~ ~ g~ i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
n-~t9.JI 10 i{'>
~ !ill GJ /(~~ ',"
I ' ,J
- -- - - -L'i,_~/~
. "..;(;i(.;.,..
:~ ,:,~,.,,:../%), .):.';::' !:::'
.,.,.....,.
.wE_
"
.:",~:;.:
/
I
~
I-
I
/
,
/
/
,j,
----- 7//
,1'1,/
./( 1Yi~~1
'7/ I
I/{;/
;jI /;/.
(I//;'
,Ir.'i I
1/ /:/;' .
'/y;7
;......1.....
.:/
/. ..ri
r-
/
L
L
--------------- ,"'--------- ~
\'~
--------------------
J6lJ8 iJ.&SIZJXJH 1'1'00] ~ ~ :3:ltW
~~l!6dN3CDOIIIl.3OVXXI1S
~ ~,g.;iO.f1oa:J,.S~
,." ~,
~
Z1lI rOllill[~~ tl qt.:lIJ.:I IIIIp.U8....-'\0lI.10lOllJOCl',,~
.
.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT
APPLICATION
PROJECT:
NORTHWEST FIRE & RESCUE STATION NO. 51
CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
Prepared for:
Southwest Florida Water Management District
Prepared by:
~
TBE Group, Inc.
380 Park Place Boulevard, Suite 300
Clearwater, Florida 33759
TBE Project No. 00083-101-00
February 17, 2003
.
.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Clearwater's Northwest Fire and Rescue Station No. 51 is a proposed fIre and rescue
facility to be constructed on approximately 1.59 acres of land in Section 3, Township 29 South,
Range 15 East, at 1720 Overbrook Avenue, in the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida.
The property is located at the southwest intersection of Overbrook Avenue, and North Betty
Lane. See the Site Vicinity Map and USGS Quadrangle Map, Figure 1 and Figure 2,
respectively, located in Section 2 ofthis Engineering Report.
The project area is bordered to the north by Overbrook Avenue, commercial and residential
property; residential property to the south; North Betty Lane and residential property to the east;
and City of Clearwater commercial property adjacent to the west side of the project area. West
of the City's property is wetlands and Stevenson Creek.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The existing site is currently a junkyard facility. The total project area consists of approximately
1.59 acres. The site consists of dilapidated buildings, and concrete and asphalt surfaces, with
some open space and few trees. The existing conditions ofthe project area are as follows:
ITEM
AREA
IMPERVIOUS AREA
OPEN SPACE
POND AREA
EXISTING BASIN
1.59 AC
1.31 AC
0.28 AC
o
The existing drainage pattern generally runs north and west on the property. Adjacent to the
north is an existing Pinellas County ditch system. Adjacent to the west of the project area is a
City owned parcel, which is an extended area of the existing junkyard facility. Both the ditch
and westerly-owned parcels flow overland to the southwest into adjacent wetland area. The
wetland area is bordered at the south end by Stevenson Creek (see Construction Drawings,
Aerial Site Plan).
The United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil Survey for
Pinellas County identifIes the soil at the site to be represented by Made Land (Ma) (see Soil
Survey Exhibit). Tierra Geotechnical and Materials Engineering, results of Double Ring
InfIltration Test along with associated hand auger borings in general accordance with ASTM
standards are located in Section 3 of this Engineering Report. Tierra indicated that the
groundwater was encountered at approximately three feet below existing grade. Based on the
subsurface material encountered, Tierra recommends over excavating two to three feet of the
existing site and replacing the material as needed with clean, engineered fIll. They estimate that
the seasonal high groundwater table will be encountered at a depth of approximately one foot
below existing grade. Therefore, the seasonal high water table for design is assumed to be
elevation 18.0 feet, which is consistent with the soil boring location and geotechnical
recommendation. Based on the results of the DR! test, the infIltration rate is estimated to be 10
feet/day.
TBE G roup, Inc.
J:\O0083\000831OI.OO\OOC\ReportsIENGREPORT -rev I.doc
January 2003
.
.
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
The design criteria for this project are based on general conformance with the current City of
Clearwater Stormwater Manual and the requirements of the Southwest Florida Water
Management District (SWFWMD). A SWFWMD Individual Environmental Resource Permit
has been included in Section 1 of this Engineering Report.
The proposed conditions include the construction of a 12,280 square foot fIre station, associated
parking, driveway, and stormwater management system. The proposed site modilications are as
follows:
ITEM
AREA
IMPERVIOUS AREA
GREEN AREA
POND AREA
EXISTING BASIN
1.59 AC
0.70 AC
0.57 AC
0.32 AC
The proposed site will continue to maintain existing drainage patterns while collecting runoff
through a drainage collection system directed through three dry retention stormwater ponds as
shown on the Paving, Grading, and Drainage Plan. Stormwater management systems must
comply with the rules of SWFWMD and the City of Clearwater per the latest update of August
23,2002. The stormwater management for dry retention systems will comply with SWFWMD
rules for water quality and quantity. The basic drainage criteria are as follows:
A. Stormwater Management Facilities
1. Total treatment volume shall again be available within 24 hours from a major design
storm event, however, only that volume which can again be available within 36 hours
may be counted as part ofthe volume required for water quality storage.
2. The design of the system must be such that the water velocities and associated flow path
through the storage pond do not cause the accumulated pollutants to be flushed out of the
treatment pond up to the 25-year, 24-hour design storm.
3. Perimeter maintenance and operation easements, with a minimum width of 20 feet and
slopes no steeper than 4:1 (horizontal: vertical), should be provided landward of the
control elevation water line. Linear stormwater management facilities may be permitted
to have a maintenance and operation easement on one side, only, if the entire site can be
maintained from this provision. Widths less than 20 feet are allowed when it can be
demonstrated that equipment can enter and perform the necessary maintenance for the
system.
B. Water Quality Results
The proposed dry retention ponds were designed to retain the treatment volume of one-half inch
over the entire 1.59 acre basin area. The criteria for the drainage area is defmed as follows:
TBE G roup, Inc.
J:\00083\000831 OI.OO\DOC\Reports\ENGREPORT -rev I.doc
2
January 2003
.
.
a) All proposed paved areas.
b) All proposed building areas.
c) All proposed grassed areas within the basin boundaries.
d) Pond bottom elevation shall be at least one foot above the seasonal high water table
to allow for positive percolation.
e) The pond is to recover within a five-day period with a safety factor of two applied to
the drawdown calculations.
Treatment Volume Required:
Basin Area = 69,224 SF = 1.59 AC
69,224 SF x ((1/2")/12) = 2,884 CF = 0.066 AC-FT
Treatment Volume Provided:
Top Area of Treatment = 7,994 SF ELEV. 20.4
Bottom Area of Treatment = 6,926 SF ELEV.20.0
Depth of Pond (for Treatment) = 0.40 FT
Treatment Volume = (7,994 + 6,926)/2 x 0.40 = 2,984 CF = 0.069 AC-FT
The treatment volume required for recovery will be adequate. Ponds Version 3.2.0068 was used
for the water quality drawdown calculations. The water quality volume staged to an elevation of
20.4, which is equal to the excess run-off weir elevation, and will percolate to a dry condition in
less than ten hours, providing for the desired recovery. See the Ponds results for the water
quality drawdown calculation located in Section 2 of this Engineering Report.
c. Water Quantity (SWFWMD Requirements)
The Impermeable Surface Ratio (ISR) is approximately ~ of the existing conditions. Since the
proposed impervious area is less than pre-conditions, that is, Cnpost < Cnpre, attenuation was not
required. ICPR Version 2.2 was used to route the 24-hour, 25-year storm through the stormwater
management system for the proposed conditions. See all calculations in Section 2 of this
Engineering Report. The stormwater run-off for pre-conditions, and post development discharge
is, 8.57 cfs, and 6.02 cfs, respectively.
D. Stormwater Runoff
As shown on the attached Node Diagram, Exhibit 1, Basin 4 collects 0.81 acres of the site runoff
via a series of drainage collection pipes and directs the flow to a proposed pond (node 4) at the
southeastern portion of the site. From this pond (node 4) an equalizer pipe is connected to an
inlet (node 3). The equalizer pipe from node 3 connects to another proposed dry retention pond
(node 2) located at the southwestern portion of the site, which collects 0.27 acres (Basin 2) of
runoff via a swale. Basin 1 collects 0.52 acres of site runoff via a series of drainage collection
pipes and directs the flow to a proposed pond (node 1) at the northwestern portion of the site.
The southwest pond (node 2) is connected to the northwest pond (node 1) via a 24-inch RCP
storm pipe.
TBE Group, Inc.
J :\00083\000831 0 1.00\DOC\Reports\ENG REPORT-rev i.doc
3
January 2003
, .,
.
.
The proposed retention ponds were designed to have the bottom elevation at 20.0 and top of
banks at 21.5. The ponds will be approximately eight to nine inches deep at Design High Water
(DHW) for the 24-hour, 25-year storm. The discharge from the ponds was routed through an
FDOT Type "D" modified inlet located in the northwest pond (node 1).
An oil skimmer will be provided around the proposed outfall structure (see pond control
structure detail on the Drainage Details sheet). The outfall structure will have a 45 LF, 15 inch
RCP discharge pipe, which will connect to an existing Pinellas County ditch at the northwest
comer of the project area, and on the south side of Over brook Avenue. (see Paving, Grading, and
Drainage Plan). The stormwater flows form this ditch west to another ditch located at the south
side of Over brook Avenue, and eventually flows west to southwest to Stevenson Creek, which is
located southwest of the project area.
DRAJNAGESTRUCTURES
The following drainage structures have been provided:
A. Endwall Types
1. Mitered End Section, FDOT Index No. 272.
2. Side Drain Mitered End Section, FDOT Index No. 273
B. Entrance Loss Coefficient (Ke)
1. Mitered End Section - 0.7
C. Storm Drains
1. A design storm frequency of 10 years has been used to comply with City of Clearwater
requirements.
2. A minimum longitudinal grade within the inverted crown of the paved areas of 0.3
percent has been designed for shallow swale conveyance.
D. Minimum Culvert Size
1. Storm Drain
14 x 23 inch
E. Maximum Pipe Lengths without Access Structures
1. I8-inch Pipe 300 feet
2. 24-inch to 36-inch Pipe 400 feet
3. 42 inch and larger 500 feet
F. Manning's Roughness Coefficient
1. Concrete Pipe 0.012
(Concrete is proposed as the primary pipe material on the project)
METHODS USED TO ESTIMATE DESIGN DISCHARGE
A. Storm Drains
THE Group, Inc.
J:\00083\00083I 0 1.00\DOC\Reports\ENGREPORT -rev I.doc
4
January 2003
~
, ~ -...
.
.
1. The rational method may be used for all projects, which have major basins not exceeding
10 acres.
B. Stormwater Management Facilities
1. The SCS Unit Hydrograph Method has been used in the ICPR model for dynamic
modeling of the pond system.
2. Shape Factor
256 (Flat terrain with slopes less than five percent)
3. Rainfall Distribution
Florida Modified
4. Design Rainfall Depths
7.5 inches (10-year storm event - storm drains)
9.0 inches (25-year storm event - stormwater
management facilities)
METHODS USED TO DELINEATE DRAINAGE AREAS
A. Field Reviews and Surveys
B. SWFWMD Aerial Contour Maps
CONCLUSION
The proposed development will enhance the surrounding properties, and will not impact the
surrounding environment in a negative manner by the provision of new stormwater management
ponds.
The proposed conditions, Impermeable Surface Ratio (ISR), is approximately Y2 of the existing
conditions. The proposed impervious area at the site will be approximately 0.70 acres, which is
less than the existing conditions of 1.31 acres.
The proposed development stormwater discharge (Qpost) is 6.02 cfs, which is less than the
existing conditions stormwater run..:off(Qpre) of8.57 cfs.
The stormwater management system will be provided to satisfy. the treatment requirements of
SWFWMD and the City of Clearwater.
The City of Clearwater will be responsible for managing all stormwater management facilities.
THE Group, Inc.
J :\00083\000831 0 1.00\DOCIReports\ENG REPORT-rev l.doc
5
January 2003
J
'It)
'00
'0
I
..... ';or')
I
...
,
CD
,
o
, I
lD ...
'00
PRE-CAST CONC. TOP - SAME
PROFILE AS ON BWLDlNC, SECTIONS
SOLDIER COURSE
BRICK VENEER AS ON BIILDlNC,
V1' THICK
ALUMINUM LETTERS TYP
(PAINTED>
FINISH C,RACE AT CENTER OF SKiN IS AT APPROX.
35.88 - VERIFY C,RACE unTH OVlL AND ADJUST HC,HT,
OF SKiN TO MATCH AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE THESE
DIMENSIONS
ELEVATION OF SIGN
SCALE. 3/4' = 1'.()'
PRE-CAST CONC, TOP - SAME
PROFILE AS ON BUlLDlNC, SECTIONS
SOLDIER COURSE
8' MASONRY - SEE STRUCTURAL FOR
FIlLED CELLS AND REINFORONC, TYP.
BRICK VENEER AS ON BUlLDlNC,
X't.~'lETTERS TYP
(PAINTED>
VERIFY FINISH C,RACE WI
SITE CONDITIONS AND III
CIVIL DRAUNC,S TYP
, C,ROUT SOUD ALL SPACES BELOII
C,RACE TYP.
CONe. FOUNDATION - SEE STRUCTURAL
SECTION @ SIGN
SCALE-3/4'= 1'.()'
.
'. \
.
~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
'.
~Cle.arwater
~
~
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED: ,. 7.'1,~
RECEIVED BY (staff initial~: I)
ATLAS PAGE #: 260 1$
ZONING DISTRICT: C-
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: c.f.
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
~ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
~ SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ fJ/A
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ~ use additional sheets as necessa
t: i tr~~-~..,~.Ji_~:.__-
'; .J <l ,
!'\ I'
N JAN 2 3 2007i
)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLIC
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 1
APPLICANT NAME:
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
City of Clearwater
MAILING ADDRESS:
610 Franklin Street. Clearwater. FL 33756
E-MAILADDRESS:whanson@clearwaterfl.com
CELL NUMBER:
(727) 224-7360
PHONE NUMBER: (727) 562-4334
FAX NUMBER: (727) 562-4328
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
City of Clearwater
(Must include ALL owners)
MAILING ADDRESS:
TBE Group ",......".'" Z"",.(~,
380 Park Place Boulevard, Suite 300, Clearwater, FL 33759
AGENT NAME(S):
E-MAIL ADDRESS:bzarlenga@tbegroup.com
CELL NUMBER:
(727) 639-5569
PHONE NUMBER: (727) 531-3505
FAX NUMBER: (727) 539-1294
STREET ADDRESS of subject site:
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
1720 Overbrook Drive
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
As shown on enclosed boundary survey (see attached).
(if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal)
PARCEL NUMBER:
PARCEL SIZE:
1.59 acres,
(acres, square feet)
69,224 SF
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: Fire and Rescue Station - Single Story - 12.300 SF +/_
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Reduction in number of parking spaces; height reduction.
(include all requested code deviations: e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
~''',
D~~S THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVI. Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
,
,
c. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is locate,d. 1 . d . db' h . th th . d t' 1 1
The proposed deve opment 1S eS1gne to e 1n armony W1 e reS1 en 1a sca e
and use of materials as much as possible given the nature of the facility.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
The surrounding property is liqht industrial and residential. The proposed
development is in keeping with the tone and tenor of the neighborhood and should
encourage similar development.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
Th~sproperty development is a Public-Safety Facility (Fire Rescue Facility) and
so will improve the health and safety of the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is desig,ned to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed f1re stat10n will have a staff of only 11 people which may double
only at shift change. There is no expectation that there will be any more
traffic generated beyond this.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Community character of the area is light industrial and residential. The proposed
development uses residential materials and scales.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjac~nt properties.
Hours OT operation are 24 hours/day, 7 days/week - The building has been placed
to sheild truck and siren noise from the residential area to the south upon the
fire rescue vehicles exiting the facility.
o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
The building height is dictated by the equipment required to fit under it, and
on-site parking is limited by area constraints.
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.) d
The propose development will reduce insurance rates and fire rescue response
times in the vicinity resulting in equal or greater property values.
3. The uses within the comprehensive infHI redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
Fire rescue stations are a public. civic use and are permitted in the City of
Clearwater.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
Adjacent land use is typically residential and light industrial and all
adjacent land uses will be serviced by the proposed fire rescue facility.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
This site was chosen after an exhaustive search for suitable property.
Studies in fire protection dictated this qeneral location.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
Fire protection response times are expected to be cut dramatically in the
immediate vicinity of the proposed development.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for develoRment and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Building mass is broken into smaller portions to more closely relate to
residential surroundings.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
ilT!m~diate viciniJy of the pwcel wpposeq forddevelop,mellt aflq the City of Clearwater as p whple.
He1qnt vanance 1S olctate by ne1gnt ot equ1pment to De housed - off-street
parking is provided for designed shift-changes only.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-strllEl,t P'ilrking in the ;mmedi~te vicinity.of parcel proposed fqr development.
There W1 I I De no snareo parK1ng agreement.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
The building is not in the tourist disctrict or downtown district.
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
"
r--
E.
, M'
,tf
rJf
Q
.
SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; (Re..t'e.... ~ e""c\.,~eJ Co"s.\r.....d-\cw, p\"'"1O .,~ CPv~,-$hee+)
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the
submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
fiI'" GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
Q
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); & /A )
COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
~
F.
~
)(
)(
):
X
,.,
X
L
X-
'"
X
~
SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701};.I<~sr 1'lJI'l. bi.N-X 6AAIieL,S;
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks
~
)L
~
~
~
x
"'/'"
~
~
~
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.SR.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses
)(
)<..
~
)(.
~
~
f-
~
Q
REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11) and color rendering if possible
~
-.L
)I:
T
iilA
~
)C..
~
)(
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
. . .
, G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
~ LANDSCAPE PLAN:
~ All existing and proposed structures;
-.L Names of abutting streets;
~ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
- Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
-""- Sight visibility triangles;
-$- Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
~ Proposed and required parking spaces;
-L Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on
required tree survey);
-L Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
--i.- Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
- Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
f'J j,. percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
x.. Irrigation notes
~ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (color rendering if possible)
D IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications)
D COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21) I
, STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
L Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
.:L Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
It- All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
-X- Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
X Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
i Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
D COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
D COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
~ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials
~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
D All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
ri' All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
D Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
D Reduced sign age proposal (8 Y2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
~C:~d
Signature of property owner or representative
~~'~""
STATE OF FLORIDA, LAS w4
Sworn to and s i. ~..~f~ ~ this ~ day of
~Y\U\tlrIJ ~,.~S :il! rne and/or by
ouJlo-v>-ef E. 44/~(j ~#'i,27,'4'JJ.!~ sonally now has
prod~ced. =: ~ "3 ~ cJl \ 1\ :: as
Identification. =*: ... . =
~ .z. \ #CC905979 :~. i
~,-o. .~~
~?-' l;8onded~#..'O~
.... ~FIIin-~"'. i:f.
z.. ~
rOt
NOYary public,
My commission expires:
).00'1
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations rnade in this
application are true and accurate to the best of rny knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
City of Clearwater
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
1720 Overbrook Drive (previouslv known as "Central FLA Used Alltn Parts")
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Construction of Northwest Fire and Rescue Station No. 51
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
TBE Group
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
City of Clearwater
Property Owner ~ C 4t?~dd
Property Owner
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the Sta,te of Florida, on this
..J4.,Y\""'~ ' ;I 003 personally appeared ROv.}}1b\d E, H ~rqJd....
Depos s and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
My Commission Expires: yo-", ,)'7- )00 'f <[JJ~
~,\\\\""I1I11"ll
1'l."'~~a~ne Hans. ~II~
~~. ......... o;? ~
~ .~. ~SION ~:.. ~
~. ~. ~
d $ .. ~~27,<'a z e. ~
J '1 "'_~ :$~~ ~~:.
t?'- 0'- =. d~ of : *
who having beES trJ duly s~m :
~ -z :. #CC905919 : i:f
,-<p.. -ffi ~
~~ ... ~~~...... ... <::J'~
~'I}- ..IFain-illS~'~. <<:'~
~/I. Ie STr-.\ . ".....
III"", 1I11"\\\\~
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewl2002 Formslcomprehensive inti/l application 2002.doc
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
. -
, ",
, ,
'.
.
.
SCHEDULE
A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That Part of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 3, Township 29
S, Range 15 E,described as follows: Beginning in the West
boundary of the public thoroughfare known as "Betty Lane" at a
point which bears N 89036'07" W, 68.91 feet from the SE corner
of said SW 1/4 of SE 1/4; and running thence on the same
bearing, along the south boundary of said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4,
694.24 feet; thence N 006'21" W,513.94 feet to the Southwesterly
boundary of said thoroughfare known as "Betty Lane"; thence S 530
26 '09 " E, along said boundary 838.9 feet to the beginning of a
curve in said thoroughfare boundary; the chord of which curve
bears S 47055'51" E from this point; thence following said curve
along the Betty Lane thoroughfare boundary, 28.62 feet to the
Point of Beginning.
"
I I
II
"
II
"
) ,~
Corpo.e Warranty Deed
.
This Indenture, made this 31st day of October
A.D. 2002 Between
CENTRAL FLORIDA USED AUTO PARTS, INC.
whose post office address is:
a corporation existing under the laws of the
State of FLORIDA
CITY OF CLEARWATER
, Grantor and
whose post office address is: P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748
Grantee,
Witnesseth, that the said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of ( Ten & NO /100 )
Dollars, to it in hand paid by the said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and
sold to the said Grantee forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of
Pinellas , State of Florida, to wit:
SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Subject to covenants, restrictions and easements of record. Subject
also to taxes for 2002 and subsequent years.
Parcel Identification Number: 03/29/15/00000/430/0500
~q.no:;>8PUOaUJ"IIII_oIl.>uP^"
_B6-S;~<:"~"r,~~~"~~L) Hd
ElNINNV'ld ':-g~I~~~r-:;~~~~"'~~3..lIH::>ld"'"
UIlJlI 'IBIWMnI
::~:itii!:J ~ ;til
II
. .
3IlOS3H , 31:11:1
~VMW3"IO:IO AOO
19t NOU.VlS ~.1.S3MH.UION ! I
I.
II
i.
t tt tt
I !! ~;
~ ~ ~ ~\~
! I ! I I il
~ I ~I
~! I ~ I
~~ I a.
III ~
~ Ii I
~ g' I
wJ
. I~
~ ~ ~
~ '
~ a ~
h
d
r if fr
!I~ ~ ~ ~J
I~ I I I II
~~ I I I II z
e I I I I I ~
_, I ~a I I I ~
~~, I ,~I I I
~ ~I i ~! ~ i
~
"''''
~
~~I
UI
B,~
Kh~
I !~
,In ~
g' ! ~
I ~ ~
. s ~
~
I~
J I JlW
o
~
. .
I r .
I J J J
t tr tt
~ ~ ~ IJ
. . I . .
I I I II
I I I II
I I I II
I ! I II
~I W i I II
~ ~. I
II a g
iil;li~ ..,. N
~r
~ "I
i ~ ~
I I' I ! ,
I I ~ I I
I I ~ I I
I I . I I
I I I II
I J1 I I I Jl
+ + ++
,~__!; "".... :o~ -
-- .~. ----
~ ;--
'f
.JOa ._
,($"', '
./ t'/;
,#.
~
..
.' .
/
. , /
/ 'i/
. .://,
:,) / .
::'4
_ :fJ
~~...,
"
,
.'
. :~"
,I
"
.
.
..o:;.~-'..
.~ '.- -~. ...,- ..
;:.1
N'tld
:3d't ::lSON'tl
,.....
..~~
'.~ .-:;~~ii'.~~~
'YCJ!-'OT~ '~]J......""..3'::) .'.1...... ".!S. ..... ,':;ewti'=, ot..t......~.t..'-~.. ,
IN]IIrI.l"Yd~O lO~9:JV OfoIV :1Ift.~ i!~~
Y3J.YM~"J':J :I<? A.L~O '~..........>'
~50N NOIIV1S
30::lS3M ON't 3MI:! lS3MHIMON
"
"
'o'
~
;;]:
'j
il.
, .
~ w..
.- .
~~~
;,~"
d';:
! -1' .~.
'. / ,,~ -
/ ,~ I
/ ",',
I
/
d
~~~
. "~I'"
..l.l
".!r,
/
1/
._..'to
/:;
:-- ~"
:', ..
, ~ ~.
'-..--~
~ ro/'i:t/L ...0 no
,or-..
iOO"l(JI-rlIOOCl "ON P"Io.Id n"
, ~ I -
,
N'Vld 31lS
I=.::;::.:.:.,-~". ~ '.1 _.'~.
Q;Il>__~-"D:l1 ;[,
l ~.'i'i''':~i*3""'"AY8~.1I'1~
LS 'ON NOIl'V1S
3n:::lS3ij aN" 3ijl::l lS3MH1l:tON
~~
il oe
~ i .~
~ b ~~ ~ l!
~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~. ~~ ~~
.. ~ i~~ .~
B ~~~i ~ '" ~ ~u~ ~" ~.
;1 .... lIlit~ o~ ffii
~ ~ ~ 's ~ ~ ~ ~ b z ~ ii~~ ~~ ~~
~ ~ ~ i! ~ ~ ~. " ~ iI iw ~
0; .~ ~ . ~ ~ ;~ e~ ~;
I I ~ h. ~o ~~
t DO ~ c~~ 0 "
. u ~ ~..u " ~~u ~~ ~~~
.t ~ a:: i ~ B ~ :a ~~~
~-- :~ -----
~ n .. ~~nn'~M
< ~ ,""c~,g"C
..f'.....-..~_.....
I ",-~.-...~-... ~
-~-
- "" .............w.-..."-..."'...
~~ III III III III III III III "''-
.. ~~~~~~~~~ <u
"" -" 111"'''''''_.............
-_ "'_"'0""'" ~~
DO l~ _.
~g ~ ~
-
-----,-------_.,,----~
/
/
,'"
,0.
,
,
~
!I
~ &l~
. ~ ~ ~~ ~
S ~.~'-~
c~~g~s-
~i~;~~;
;1 <~ ,,~
~ ~~~ ~~
~
/
,t1
"
,-
jl
JI
II
l~
,...
jl
'1 11
A.I ,il
I g~e I I
I <.~I n
I ~ii I !i
/ ;~: IH'
I ~~.~ I fl'
Il 11
II <I II
I l'j"I)n!1
I: 'ii II
lUll [ I fI
,II I"
Ili!1 ~
II I" ,
! ili il
I ;~! i i'l!
" ~.: I !l ij
Ii Ii I:
I ! li!1~
\,\...~\f 1~1:~li 111
\,\..!. l
,l'ji,! I'
1-1,1'
1~li
bUI. "'. V8l~/
! ~j:'fzfi
I I
III
W1
fI
/
.! 14
.,);;.
..~~,-
<";;/
/.
" < ~
~ < ~~ 2 <"i
; ~ ~ ~ <. e< - <~~ < !!
w< ~ w< ~
;; ~ :a :~ ~ ~w~~ ~ ~~ ~
~ -i2"~; I
~ " ~ ~~ ~~ 0 ~~ ~ ~
~ 9 ~~ ~~m~ i i ~ ~
;; E ii ~5 H .
- " ..; .; ;;
,
,
/
,
I
/
;; ~
:~~
" -
~
b
I
,
/
,
/
,
,
/
, l!
~V."
i,e,..' . .' ,.,
.----',--_______-J
',It
,
,
""'" ......,
./
~-----7//
;:/1' - ..'
ff t... V.l.
/'iJ'//j .
// /;j
/A1
,I.~/;I
1/ /1;
/1
//."'/
/ ..ti,'"
r -~;-~~/
r///'
,f )/ "
r.....:.!/
(Xl
I ,:;~~J~
, ." 11~i()1
"Ilc.....; r.n; I
;P~:J';d)~
111&
I!
;:i:
~I
, ~
: !
..
---,J
ill
; ~
.
.
~
'Ie
~
I
~ ;."
I
..
'Ie
~
. I
CD ..
'Ie
PRE-CAST CONe. TOP - SAnE
PROFILE AS ON. BULOING SECTIONS
SOLDIER COURSE
BRICK VENEER AS ON BlILDING
X't."Un~~ETTERS TIP
(PAINTED)
FINISH URADE AT CENTER OF SIGN IS AT APPROX.
M.88 - VERFY GRADE UTH OVIL AND ADJUST HGHT.
OF SIGN TO nA TCH AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE THESE
DmENSIONS
ELEVATION OF SIGN
SCME. 1/2". 1'.(l"
PRE-CAST CONe. TOP - SAnE
PROFILE AS ON BIIILDINc. SECTIONS
SOLDIER COURSE
8" nASONRY - SEE STRUCTURAL FOR
FILLED CELLS AND RElNFORONG TYP.
BRICK VENEER AS ON BlILDING
X't."UnIlff~ETTERS TYP
(PAINTED)
VERFY .FINISH URADE 11/
SITE CONDITIONS AND II
OVIL 0RAlIINc.s TYP
CONe. FOUNDATION - SEE STRUCTURAL
SCME.II2'= 1'.(l"
-
.
~ -
f_ .. 14'1-- , '1' . ,.
:::1- ~ . . ~
~ . - .
~ .
.. ~ . ~
. . . "
~ . ~ . !'
. .' . . .
-~ . . .. L 1..1 . MDR
I...... '
r--.. . . - __J: ~.
.. 't.. . . ..
-~ ''"' .~! Je ~
- ' I M P. e..
".~,~,-, ~. ~~~~ . ?
. -"~'" .........
"'-. /. I~ -J- It.... .
. .,~ II. . ~.. . . ~
~J - . . 'I'" ~c
. '~, . ... SFR . . -1-1-1. .. . . .
" . .. ... . ", -~....
. . IJ-!- ~
p l/ I:i,~ ;- ....!...
. SFR ' ,.... ~l
. ... I - I- - . ~ .. . . . I- ,- e
...
. ~.~ . !lo... I- . .. .. . . .
.~JI!i -
/. SFR ~ ~- IL
. . - rt' ~. . . .. . . .
"
, ~
::... ....y:.J -1-1.1.,.1-1-1-'- I... _ ........ . - .
~ _ SFR .? IL LMDR
. _.~ .. . . . .
. - 1- ~ - 1 I 1
\ ..-- . .
. . ~ I.- ..!.. . .. . .. . . . .. . .
. -... .
.. ,~~:?~. ~ . . .. .. . . . . . III
, ~ ~.[il '--
I .~- . -
J"- - . . . .. .. .
-1-1.'- .. %'.... I
. \.
. ,,~:<...... . . .. . . I . - -
, 'h;- "
"". OSIR . '..,
" .
. . . C ... .
~ . ....).....
.. 1 ,
",
I I I , I I I . - .. " 1 I
Map Request with 500 foot buffer . ',;t":, ;,,-< ' ~~ ,-~$
",''; ! '.:)j
'~',,- -- -':'~,':'. .~-' ''':,,!~--''-:~':
Owner: City of Clearwater Case: FLD2003-G 100.9.
Site: 1720 Overbrook Avenue Property Size 1.59
(Acres):
PIN: 03-29-15--00000-430--0500
Atlas Page: 260B
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Flex\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\Overbrook /720 Fire and Rescue
Station NW\Maps\Overbrook 1720 Map Request,doc
~
e
CDB Meeting Date: March 18,2003
Case Number: FLD2003-01005
Agenda Item: B2
ORIGINAL
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
APPLICANT:
City of Clearwater
REPRESENT A TIVE:
Mr. Brian Zarlenga (TBE Group)
LOCATION:
1720 Overbrook A venue
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to reduce the number of required
parking spaces for a governmental use (fire station) from 49 spaces
(four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to 20 spaces
(1.65 spaces per 1,000) and to increase the height of a solid PVC
fence from six feet to eight feet in height, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of
Section 2-704.C.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by TBE Group
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
1.59 acres; 69,224 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
100 feet of width by 125 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Vacant buildings
Governmental use (Fire and Rescue Station)
PLAN CATEGORY:
RH, Residential High Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 - Page 1
e
e
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: minor and major vehicle service, warehouse and automotive
scrap yards
West: Vacant (proposed park)
East: Single-family residential
South: Single-family residential
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: A mix of single- and multi-family residential and a variety of non-
residential uses including minor and major vehicle service,
warehouse and automotive scrap yards.
ANALYSIS:
The 1.59-acre site is located at the southwest comer of Overbrook A venue, Betty Lane and
Fairmont Street. The site is the subject of a recent annexation application and review (ANX2002-
11019). The City Commission is expected to approve the annexation of the site into the City with
a Commercial District designation and a Commercial General land use classification on March 6,
2003 at the final reading. The site is located along a highly developed area with a mix of single-
and multi-family residential and a variety of non-residential uses including minor and major
vehicle service, warehouse and automotive scrap yards. The subject property includes four vacant
one-story metal buildings, is generally paved and has undergone substantial deterioration. The site
has five, existing driveways along the front (north) property line (Overbrook Avenue).
The request is to reduce the number of required parking spaces for a governmental use (fire
station) from 49 spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to 20 spaces (1.65
spaces per 1,000) and to increase the height of a solid PVC fence from six feet to eight feet in
height, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-
704.C.
The proposal includes the demolition of all four existing, metal structures and constructing a fire
and rescue station (Northwest Fire and Rescue Station No. 51) that will be approximately 12,280
square feet in size and 23 feet in height. The building area dedicated to equipment and vehicle
storage and living area will be evenly split between the two. The building will house four fire
trucks and nine firefighters. The proposal includes 20 parking spaces and two driveways along
Overbrook A venue. The smallest building feasible has been designed for the site. The reductions
in setbacks are to pavement only and are required to provide adequate turning radii for fire trucks
and other emergency vehicles necessary to effectively operate the fire station. The site will
generally be staffed with nine employees at any given time and the provided number of parking
spaces will more than adequately serve the proposed use.
The building will include a brick and earth-tone stucco fac;ade, scoring and other architectural
features. The roofline will be articulated to provide additional aesthetic interest.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 - Page 2
e
e
The landscape plan exceeds the requirements of Code utilizing a variety of colorful groundcovers
(including liriope and dune sunflower), shrubs (including Indian hawthorn, silverthorn and
viburnum), shade and ornamental trees (including live oak, magnolia and crape myrtle and Sabal
palms).
A PVC fence, eight feet in height will be located along the rear, south property line between the
subject site and the adjacent residential use properties to the south for additional buffering.
A monument-style, freestanding sign, 37.5 square feet in area and 5.5 feet in height, is proposed
with this development. The Minimum Development Standards of the Code permit a freestanding
sign 20 square feet in area. The sign, as submitted, will require a review by Staff as part of a
Comprehensive Sign Program. Solid waste will be removed via a screened dumpster. All
stormwater requirements have been met.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-701.1):
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
FLOOR AREA 0.55 0.24 0.17 Yes
RA TIO
IMPERVIOUS 0.95 0.82 0.44 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO (ISR)
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-
704.C):
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 69,224 square 69,224 square Yes
(minimum) feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 507 feet 507 feet Yes
(minimum)
FRONT N/A North: 40 feet to North: 40 feet to Yes
SETBACK building; zero building; zero
feet to pavement feet to pavement
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18, 2003 - Case FLD2003-0 1 005 - Page 3
e
e
REQIDRED COMPLIANCE?
REAR N/A South: one foot South: 67 feet to Yes*
SETBACK to building; zero building; 13.63
feet to feet to
pavement* pavement*
SIDE N/A West: zero feet West: nine feet Yes*
SETBACK to pavement; to pavement; 59
zero feet to feet to building*
building*
HEIGHT N/A 15 feet 23 feet Yes
maximum
PARKING Determined by The site does not 20 (1.65 spaces Yes
SPACES the Community include any per 1,000 square
minimum Development striped parking feet of gross
Director based spaces floor area)
on the specific
use and/or ITE
Manual standards
* The Code does not address lot lines for triangular lots. Staff has set policy that triangular lots
shall have a front lot line (which shall be the side which has the main access), a rear lot line
(which shall be the side most closely to parallel to the front) and the remaining lot line shall be
the side lot line.
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS IN THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-704.C):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development
standards.
The subject property, currently being annexed for the purpose of locating a fire and rescue
station, has been developed with several, one-story metal buildings and is generally paved
and has undergone substantial deterioration. The area is intensely developed with a mix of
single- and multi-family residential and a variety of non-residential uses including minor
and major vehicle service, warehouse and automotive scrap yards. The proposal includes
the demolition of all four existing, metal structures and constructing a fire and rescue
station (Northwest Fire and Rescue Station No. 51) of approximately 12,280 square feet.
The smallest building feasible has been designed for the site. The reductions in setbacks
are to pavement only and will provide adequate turning radii for the fire trucks and other
vehicles necessary to operate a fire station. The building will meet all required setbacks.
The site will generally be staffed with nine employees at any given time and the provided
number of parking spaces will more than adequately serve the proposed use.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 - Page 4
e
e
Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
The ultimate redevelopment of this site will likely enhance abutting properties with an
attractively designed building and extensive landscaping. The existing buildings are
deteriorating, metal structures and the site is generally paved without any landscaping. The
current assessed valuation of the site is $318,000. The anticipated value of the site is
expected to be in excess of $2,000,000.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The proposed governmental use is permitted in City of Clearwater.
4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project is
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Adjacent land uses are a mix of single- and multi-family residential and a variety of non-
residential uses including minor and major vehicle service, warehouse and automotive
scrap yards. The subject property, developed with four, one-story metal buildings, is
generally paved and has undergone substantial deterioration. The site has five, existing
driveways along the front (north) property line (Overbrook Avenue). The proposal will
provide a new, attractively designed building and extensive landscaping.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of uses within the
Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
Studies undertaken by the City indicate that a fire station in this area is needed. The
subject site was the only site in the area suited to the proposed use. In addition, the
demolition of the existing structures on the site will constitute an improvement to the site
and the neighborhood as a whole.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Inflll
Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
The subject property has been developed with four, one-story metal buildings, is generally
paved and has undergone substantial deterioration. The site has five, existing driveways
along the front (north) property line (Overbrook Avenue). The proposed building will be
attractively designed with a light colored stucco finish and a red brick facade, an extensive
use of windows along the street (Overbrook Avenue), various architectural details and a
peaked roof. Landscaping will be provided along all property lines and will exceed the
requirements of Code.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity
Staff Report- Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01oo5 - Page 5
e
e
of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposal includes the demolition of all four existing, metal structures and constructing
a fire and rescue station (Northwest Fire and Rescue Station No. 51) of approximately
12,280 square feet. The proposal includes an attractive building finished with a brick and
light sand colored, stucco finish, peaked roof, arches, banding and other architectural
features. Landscaping will be provided along all property lines and will exceed the
requirements of Code. The proposed development will enhance the community character
of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development the City of Clearwater as
a whole.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The site is almost completely paved and at least one of the existing buildings encroaches
on a neighboring property. The proposed fire station will both beautify the area and
provide a much-needed service by protecting the citizens of Clearwater. The smallest
building feasible has been designed for the site and will meet all required setbacks. The
reductions in setbacks are to pavement only and will allow for an adequate turning radii for
the vehicles necessary to operate a fire station. The site will generally be staffed with nine
employees at any given time and the provided number of parking spaces will more than
adequately serve the proposed use.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The site will generally be staffed with nine employees at any given time and the provided
number of parking spaces will adequately serve the proposed use.
Staff Report - Community Development Bo~rd - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 - Page 6
.
e
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with one- and two-story single- and multi-family dwellings and a
variety of non-residential uses ranging from warehousing, a variety of vehicle service uses
and light industrial-type businesses. The proposal includes the demolition of all four
existing, metal structures and constructing a 12,280 square foot fire and rescue station
(Northwest Fire and Rescue Station No. 51) located well outside all required setbacks. It
will be 23 feet in height with 6,125 square feet of living area and 6,155 feet of equipment
and vehicle storage area. The proposal includes 20 parking spaces and two driveways
along Overbrook A venue. The smallest building feasible has been designed for the site and
the reductions in setbacks are to pavement only in order to provide adequate turning radii.
The site will generally be staffed with nine employees at any given time and the provided
number of parking spaces will more than adequately serve the proposed use. It will
provide a positive redevelopment example for the area. The development complies with
density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Commercial District. The
proposal is consistent and in harmony with scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of
the adjacent properties.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is zoned Commercial District and characterized by single- and multi-family
dwellings. The character and intensity of the proposed development will be in compliance
with that zoning classification with a new, attractively designed residentially scaled
building with abundant landscaping. The development complies with density and
impervious surface ratio standards within the Commercial District. The proposal will help
encourage similar redevelopment of adjacent sites.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed governmental use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in
the neighborhood. Conversely, the development should enhance the health and safety of
persons residing and/or working in the neighborhood.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 - Page 7
.
e
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will eliminate three of the five driveways along Overbrook
A venue. The proposal includes redeveloping the site with a single building. The overall
vehicle trip generation should not increase in the area with the proposal and should not
have any significant, negative impact on affected intersections or roadways and with no
reduction in level of service (LOS) on Overbrook A venue.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the community
character of the immediate vicinity, through attractive architecture and well-designed
landscaping.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes removing existing pavement and constructing a 12,280 square foot
building with attractive architecture and well-designed landscaping. Adequate parking and
landscaping in excess of Code requirements will be provided. The level of service on
Overbrook A venue will not be degraded.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on February 13, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development application to reduce the number of required parking spaces for a governmental use
(fire station) from 49 spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to 20 spaces
(1.65 spaces per 1,000) and to increase the height of a solid PVC fence from six feet to eight feet
in height, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section
2-704.C for the site at 1720 Overbrook A venue, with the following bases and conditions.
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 - Page 8
e
-
Conditions of approval:
1. That all Stormwater requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
2. That a Tree Preservation Plan, prepared by a Certified Arborist, which indicates how the
proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines)
and how those impacts will be mitigated, tree barricade limits and details be submitted to and
approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
4. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme
including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of
uniformity; and
5. That evidence of a County right-of-way permit for all work within right-of-way of Overbrook
A venue be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any permits
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: . V
M~, Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:\Planning Department\C D B\FleXIPending cases\Upfor the next DRClOverbrook 1720 Fire and Rescue Station N'MOverbrook 1720 STAFF
REPORT. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 - Page 9
~
.
.
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
R ~.' ~.'.'. ,~.
M' ','~
FLD2003 01005
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
APPLICANT:
City of Clearwater
REPRESENTATIVE:
Mr. Brian Zarlenga (TBE Group)
LOCATION:
1720 Overbrook Avenue
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to reduce the number of required
parking spaces for a governmental use (fire station) from 49 spaces
(four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to 20 spaces
(1.65 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, reduce the side
(west) setback from 10 feet to nine feet (to pavement) and reduce the
rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 13 feet (to pavement), as part of
a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions
of Section 2-704.C.
.PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by TBE Group
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
1.59 acres; 69,224 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
100 feet of width by 125 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Parking lot
Multi-family residential
PLAN CATEGORY:
RH, Residential High Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Multi-family residential
DRAFT Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 _
Page 1
It
.
West: Multi-family residential
East: Multi-family residential
South: Multi-family residential
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Multi-family dwellings, retail, office and overnight accommodation
uses dominate the immediate vicinity.
ANALYSIS:
The 1.59-acre site is located at the southwest comer of Overbrook Avenue, Betty Lane and
Fairmont Street. The site is the subject of a recent annexation application and review (ANX2002-
11019). The City Commission is expected to approve the annexation the site into the City of
Clearwater with a Commercial District designation and a Commercial General Land Use
classification on March 6, 2003 at the final reading. It is located along a highly developed area
with a mix of single-familyresidential and a variety of non-residential uses including vehicle
service, warehouse and p~~~. The subject property has been developed with four, one-story metal
buildings, is generally paved and has undergone substantial deterioration. The site has five,
existing driveways along the front (north) property line (Overbrook A venue).
The request is to reduce the number of required parking spaces for a governmental use (fire
station) from 49 spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to 20 spaces (1.65
spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, reduce the side (west) setback from 10 feet to nine
feet (to pavement) and reduce the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 13 feet (to pavement), as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-402.G.
The proposal includes the demolition of all four existing, metal structures and constructing a
12,280 square foot fire and rescue station (Northwest Fire and Rescue Station No. 51). It will be
_' ,,^ori _'!'U~ :!_!'!''':~''_:__ _',~
23 feet in height with ~ square feet of living area and ~ feet of equipment and vehicle storage
area. .t\lnajority of the building is dedicated to equipment and vehicle storage. The building will
house II fire trucks and @ firefighters. The proposed building will be located well outside all
required setbacks. The proposal includes 20 parking spaces and two driveways along Overbrook
A venue. The smallest building feasible has been designed for the site. The reductions in setbacks
are to pavement only and will provide adequate turning radii for the fire trucks and other vehicles
necessary to operate a fire station. The building will meet all required setbacks. The site will
generally be staffed with 11 employees at any given time and the provided number of parking
spaces will more than adequately serve the proposed use.
The building will include a brick and earth-tone stucco fa<;:ade, scoring and other architectural
features. The roofline will be articulated to provide additional aesthetic interest.
DRAFT Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 _
Page 2
.
e
The landscape plan exceeds the requirements of Code utilizing a variety of colorful groundcovers
(including liriope and dune sunflower), shrubs (including Indian hawthorn, silverthorn and
viburnum), shade and ornamental trees (including live oak, magnolia and crape myrtle and Sabal
palms.
..iFm:Be::7reniovedi'via"bI~~
_t'<)~~>'~"_:-':~~>Lr,,<, - ", '_ _ -.p:/>: :_,' ,"_,_"',':,::'::
411j!e~, ,;'&:vilr~.~~qui~~~.t~~.~ paJ4:!jUQ
~.. teg~{tCqui~m~htsl1a.Y::f;.'1:>een.lneq
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-701.1):
STANDARD
REQUIRED/
PERMITTED
0.55
EXISTING
PROPOSED
IN
COMPLIANCE?
Yes
FLOOR AREA
RA TIO
IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE
RATIO (ISR)
0.95
N'a:'lnf
........,...~....
Q~g
0.17
0.44
Yes
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT ST ANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-
704.C):
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 69,224 square 69,224 square Yes
(minimum) feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 507 feet 507 feet Yes
(minimum)
FRONT N/A North: 40 feet to North: 40 feet to Yes
SETBACK building; zero building; zero
feet to pavement feet to pavement
DRAFT Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 _
Page 3
Determined by
the Community
Development
Director based
on the specific
use and/or ITE
Manual standards
The Code is silent on triangular lots with regards to which property lines constitute sides and
which constitute rear for the purposes of determining setbacks. Staff has determined that in the
case of triangular lots, the property line which most nearly runs parallel to the front property
line (that which runs along a street right-of-way) will be considered a rear property line. The
third property line is considered a side provided is does not run along a street right-of-way (in
which case it would be considered a front property line).
STANDARD
REAR
SETBACK
SIDE
SETBACK
HEIGHT
maximum
PARKING
SPACES
minimum
*
.
PERMITTED/
REQUIRED
N/A
EXISTING
South: one foot
to building; zero
feet to
avement*
West: zero feet
to pavement;
zero feet to
building*
.
PROPOSED
South: 67 feet to
building; 13.63
feet to
avement*
West: nine feet
to pavement; 59
feet to building*
23 feet
20 (1.65 spaces
per 1,000 square
feet of gross
floor area)
IN
COMPLIANCE?
Yes*
Yes*
Yes
Yes
DRAFT Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 -
Page 4
N/A
N/A
Nl.~~".
t,,,,,,~
.
.
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS IN THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-704.C):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development
standards.
The subject property has been developed with several, one-story metal buildings and is
generally paved. The site has undergone substantial deterioration. The area is intensely
developed with a mix of single-family resigen.tial and a variety of non-residential uses
including vehicle service, warehouse and !J~,~. The proposal includes the demolition of
all four existing, metal structures and constructing a 12,280 square foot fire and rescue
station (Northwest Fire and Rescue Station No. 51). The smallest building feasible has
been designed for the site. The reductions in setbacks are to pavement only and will
provide adequate turning radii for the fire trucks and other vehicles necessary to operate a
fire station. The building will meet all required setbacks. The site will generally be
staffed with 11 employees at any given time and the provided number of parking spaces
will more than adequately serve the proposed use.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infin
Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
The ultimate redevelopment of this site will likely enhance abutting properties. The
existing buildings are deteriorating metal buildings and the site is g;ellerally paved without
any landscaping. The current assessed valuatio~()fthesite is $(7,2QlGGg. The anticipated
value of the site is expected to be in excess of $!1~2:f!im)i(Qu.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infin Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The proposed governmental use is a permitted use in City of Clearwater.
4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infin Redevelopment Project is
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Adjacent land uses are a mix of single-family residential and a variety of non-residential
uses including vehicle service, warehouse and US~. The subject property has been
developed with four, one-story metal buildings, is generally paved and has undergone
substantial deterioration. The site has five, existing driveways along the front (north)
property line (Overbrook Avenue). The proposal will provide a new, attractively designed
building that replaces four existing, deteriorating metal buildings.
DRAFT Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18, 2003 - Case FLD2003-0 1 005 -
Page 5
.
.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of uses within the
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
Studies undertaken by the City indicate that a fire station in this area is needed. The
subject site was the only site in the area suited to the proposed use. In addition, the
demolition of the existing structures on the site will constitute an improvement to the site
and the neighborhood as a whole.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
The subject property has been developed with four, one-story metal buildings, is generally
paved and has undergone substantial deterioration. The site has five, existing driveways
along the front (north) property line (Overbrook A venue). The proposed building will be
attractively designed with a light colored stucco finish and red brick, windows along the
street, architectural details and peaked roof. Landscaping will be provided along all
property lines and will exceed the requirements of Code.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposal includes the demolition of all four existing, metal structures and constructing
a 12,280 square foot fire and rescue station (Northwest Fire and Rescue Station No. 51).
The proposal includes an attractive building finished with a brick and lights sand colored,
stucco finish, peaked roof, arches, banding and other architectural features. Landscaping
will be provided along all property lines and will exceed the requirements of Code. The
proposed development will enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development the City of Clearwater as a whole.
DRAFT Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 -
Page 6
.
.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The site is almost completely paved and at least one of the existing buildings encroaches
on a neighboring property. The proposed fire station will both beatify the area and provide
a much-needed service by protecting the citizens of Clearwater. The smallest building
feasible has been designed for the site. The reductions in setbacks are to pavement only
and will provide adequate turning radii for the fire trucks and other vehicles necessary to
operate a fire station. The building will meet all required setbacks. The site will generally
be staffed with 11 employees at any given time and the provided number of parking spaces
will more than adequately serve the proposed use.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The site will generally be staffed with 11 employees at any given time and the provided
number of parking spaces will more than adequately serve the proposed use.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with one- and two-story single- and multi-family dwellings and a
variety of non-residential uses ranging from warehousing, vehicle service and light
industrial-type businesses. The proposal includes the demolition of all four existing, metal
structures and constructing a 12,280 square foot fire and rescue station (Northwest Fire and
Rescue Station No. 51). It will be 23 feet in height with XN square feet of living area and
II feet of equipment and vehicle storage area. A majority of the building is dedicated to
equipment and vehicle storage. The proposed building will be located well outside all
required setbacks. The proposal includes 20 parking spaces and two driveways along
Overbrook A venue. The smallest building feasible has been designed for the site and the
reductions in setbacks are to pavement only in order to provide adequate turning radii.
The building will meet all required setbacks. The site will generally be staffed with 11
employees at any given time and the provided number of parking spaces will more than
adequately serve the proposed use. It will provide a positive redevelopment example for
the area. The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards
within the Commercial District. The proposal is consistent and in harmony with scale,
bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent properties.
DRAFT Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 _
Page 7
.
.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is zoned Commercial District and characterized by single- and multi-family
dwellings. The character and intensity of the proposed development will be in compliance
with that zoning classification with a new, attractively designed residentially scaled
building with abundant landscaping. The development complies with density and
impervious surface ratio standards within the Commercial District. The proposal will help
encourage similar redevelopment of adjacent sites.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed governmental use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in
the neighborhood. The proposal includes a new fire station with landscaping and the and
should enhance the health and safety of persons residing and/or working in the
neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will eliminate three of the five driveways along Overbrook
Avenue. The proposal includes redeveloping the site with a single building. The overall
vehicle trip generation should not increase in the area with the proposal and should not
have any significant, negative impact on affected intersections or roadways and with no
reduction in level of service (LOS) on Overbrook Avenue.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the community
character of the immediate vicinity, through attractive architecture and well-designed
landscaping.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes removing existing pavement and constructing a 12,280 square foot
building with attractive architecture and well-designed landscaping. An adequate parking
and landscaping in excess of Code requirements will be provided. The level of service on
Overbrook Avenue will not be degraded.
DRAFT Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18, 2003 - Case FLD2003-0 1005 -
Page 8
-
e
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on February 13, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development application to reduce the number of required parking spaces for a governmental use
(fire station) from 49 spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to 20 spaces
(1.65 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, reduce the side (west) setback from 10 feet
to nine feet (to pavement) and reduce the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 13 feet (to
pavement), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of
Section 2-704.C for the site at 1720 Overbrook A venue, with the following bases and conditions.
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development crite11a as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the sun-ounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
';ettPaf~i~nd RecreatibnfesS'fwi~E'6el1l.llredtobe; aid ria~1il1ii~.ffi~~isstiant~.<:)i
1:"'--\,_:: :-::H:" -'^-;--~^, ,', _i~ ',_0,;,-;0 ,/4' ,"')0' :.,,', ' ,- - - ---,--. .'.n.. I,,,,,",: '" '_N_' ,.;.-,:"~.,."g~!_,N',~_,""~_!".i,l\:\?:",JlliI10"'_",,,,_,,_,~,,:,,;,,-.t..-...:..ffi..:___ """".-.;':..,,:'" - '" .- _.:" - "-,, ," _'"up __" "":,, '''"n P_ ;"-,;:..{",,,,*lJl-'--:__;___;"._;.:m\M;-"":_:___'___'__";__;"'~':!i:,:1;_,_1:_ _ ,_ .-.-".-"",:,,", ':-'"".."m:l:
errriits'anQ
'__'00;'__--___'_",,,__ ",-,',",,,-<,,, ""
3. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme
including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of
uniformity;
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
Mark T. Parry, Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Flex\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\Overbrook 1720 Fire and Rescue Station NW\Overbrook 1720 STAFF
REPORT. doc
DRAFT Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-0l005 _
Page 9
.
.
~~\~.~. .~
~~
~ ,,)I/~ ~\
~.'l~~l)
+fJ'4TE~ ,~~
~.,~~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIWING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
March 21, 2003
Mr. Brian Zarlenga
TBE Group
380 Park Place, Suite 300
Clearwater, FL 33757
RE: Development Order regarding Case FLD2003-0 1 005 at 1720 Overbrook A venue
Dear Mr. Zarlenga:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On March 18, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
application for Flexible Development approval to reduce the number of required parking spaces for a
governmental use (fire station) from 49 spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to
20 spaces (1.65 spaces per 1,000) and to increase the height of a solid PVC fence from six feet to eight
feet in height, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section
2-704.C. The proposal includes a 12,280 square foot fire and rescue station. The Community
Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment
efforts.
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND MFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER"
March 21,2003
Zarlenga - Page Two
.
.
Conditions of approval:
1. That all Stormwater requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
2. That a Tree Preservation Plan, prepared by a Certified Arborist, which indicates how the proposed
building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) and how those
impacts will be mitigated, tree barricade limits and details be submitted to and approved by Staff
prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
4. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme
including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of uniformity;
and
5. That evidence of a County right-of-way permit for all work within right-of-way of Overbrook
A venue be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any permits
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (March 18, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be
obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change
with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a
period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
In addition, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated by a property
owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval) within 14 days of the date of the
CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on April 1 , 2003.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 727.562.4558. Zoning
information is available through the City's website at www.clearwater-fl.com via the "Clearwater
Parcel and Zoning" link and "Community Development Code" link (via the Planning Department site).
Very truly yours,
~:~
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\Planning Departmenfl.c D B\FlelNnactive or Finished Applications\Overbrook 1720 Fire and Rescue Station NW - Approved\Overbrook 1720
DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc
.
.
P-!~
~\~~LOFrN~
~.~4~
~~ -=- ~s
~~I1;~dPt~~'
~~l-~~~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
March 21, 2003
Mr. Brian Zarlenga
TBE Group
380 Park Place, Suite 300
Clearwater, FL 33757
RE: Development Order regarding Case FLD2003-0 1 005 at 1720 Overbrook A venue
Dear Mr. Zarlenga:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On March 18, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
application for Flexible Development approval to reduce the number of required parking spaces for a
governmental use (fire station) from 49 spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to
20 spaces (1.65 spaces per 1,000) and to increase the height of a solid PVC fence from six feet to eight
feet in height, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section
2-704.C. The proposal includes a 12,280 square foot fire and rescue station. The Community
Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment
efforts.
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIIlBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILl. JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
March 21, 2003
Zarlenga - Page Two
.
.
Conditions of approval:
1. That all Stormwater requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
2. That a Tree Preservation Plan, prepared by a Certified Arborist, which indicates how the proposed
building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) and how those
impacts will be mitigated, tree barricade limits and details be submitted to and approved by Staff
prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
4. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme
including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of uniformity;
and
5. That evidence of a County right-of-way permit for all work within right-of-way of Overbrook
Avenue be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any permits
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (March 18, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be
obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change
with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a
period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
In addition, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated by a property
owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval) within 14 days of the date of the
CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on April 1, 2003.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 727.562.4558. Zoning
information is available through the City's website at www.clearwater-fl.com via the "Clearwater
Parcel and Zoning" link and "Community Development Code" link (via the Planning Department site).
Very truly yours,
~.~
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\Planning Department\C D BlFlex\lnactive or Finished Applications\Overbrook 1720 Fire and Rescue Station NW - Approved\Overbrook 1720
DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc
.
.
:1!!~
~~~~LOFT~~~
fdi1f~
c:-,-_- . ~
~- ~
~~ -==- p~
~~/A~~"t~.,
~,,~.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
March 21, 2003
Mr. Brian Zarlenga
TBE Group
380 Park Place, Suite 300
Clearwater, FL 33757
RE: Development Order regarding Case FLD2003-01005 at 1720 Overbrook Avenue
Dear Mr. Zarlenga:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On March 18, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
application for Flexible Development approval to reduce the number of required parking spaces for a
governmental use (fire station) from 49 spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to
20 spaces (1.65 spaces per 1,000) and to increase the height of a solid PVC fence from six feet to eight
feet in height, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section
2-704.C. The proposal includes a 12,280 square foot fire and rescue station. The Community
Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C. .
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment
efforts.
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIllBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
March 21, 2003
Zarlenga - Page Two
.
.
Conditions of approval:
1. That all Stormwater requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
2. That a Tree Preservation Plan, prepared by a Certified Arborist, which indicates how the proposed
building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) and how those
impacts will be mitigated, tree barricade limits and details be submitted to and approved by Staff
prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
4. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme
including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of uniformity;
and
5. That evidence of a County right-of-way permit for all work within right-of-way of Overbrook
A venue be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any permits
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (March 18, 2004).. All required certificates of occupancy shall be
obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change
with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a
period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
In addition, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated by a property
owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval) within 14 days of the date of the
CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on April 1, 2003.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 727.562.4558. Zoning
information is available through the City's website at www.clearwater-fl.com via the "Clearwater
Parcel and Zoning" link and "Community Development Code" link (via the Planning Department site).
Very truly yours,
~.~
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\P/anning Departmenf\C D B\F/eXlInactive or Finished Applications\Overbrook 1720 Fire and Rescue Station NW - ApprovedlOverbrook 1720
DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc
-
.
.
~
~~w..,
C:$. Md" ~)o\.
c-:a - - - ~s
~~~.~
~~~l-E~~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
March 21, 2003
Mr. Brian Zarlenga
TBE Group
380 Park Place, Suite 300
Clearwater, FL 33757
It=;~ '(; pi r>.~
'" ,-. >,", . ',.'
" ~ h;,tl...:-,.:~' ~~:i~
__v____
Development Order regarding Case FLD2003 QI005 at 1720 Overbrook Avenue
RE:
Dear Mr. Zarlenga:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On March 18, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
application for Flexible Development approval to reduce the number of required parking spaces for a
governmental use (fire station) from 49 spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to
20 spaces (1.65 spaces per 1,000) and to increase the height of a solid PVC fence from six feet to eight
feet in height, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section
2-704.C. The proposal includes a 12,280 square foot fire and rescue station. The Community
Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment
efforts.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
March 21, 2003
Zarlenga - Page Two
.
.
Conditions of approval:
1. That all Stormwater requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
2. That a Tree Preservation Plan, prepared by a Certified Arborist, which indicates how the proposed
building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) and how those
impacts will be mitigated, tree barricade limits and details be submitted to and approved by Staff
prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
4. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme
including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of uniformity;
and
5. That evidence of a County right-of-way permit for all work within right-of-way of Overbrook
Avenue be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any permits
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (March 18, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be
obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change
with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a
period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
In addition, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated by a property
owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval) within 14 days of the date of the
CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on April 1, 2003.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 727.562.4558. Zoning
information is available through the City's website at www.clearwater,..fl.com via the "Clearwater
Parcel and Zoning" link and "Community Development Code" link (via the Planning Department site).
Very truly yours,
~.~
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\Planning Department\C D l!\Flex\Inactive or Finished Applications\Overbrook 1720 Fire and Rescue Station NW - Approved\Overbrook 1720
DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc
-~
~ ...;;-
.
.
. ~~(1.. LOFTH~~
~"
SC"2 -= f!1f,r;n ~C
~~- ~~
~ -==- ~
~~m'~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
January 24,2003
Mr. Brian Zarlenga
TBE Group
380 Park Place, Suite 300
Clearwater, FL 33759
p.... . '.' -~ ....".-
. t'. . U
. .
.' ,
L: .~
RE: Application for Flexible Standard approval (PI .02001.-12044) to reduce the
number of required parking spaces for a governmental use (fire station) from 49
spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to 20 spaces (1.65
spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, reduce the side (west) setback
from 10 feet to nine feet (to pavement) and reduce the rear (south) setback from
20 feet to 13 feet (to pavement), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C.
Dear Mr. Zarlenga:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application to reduce the number of required
parking spaces for a governmental use (fire station) from 49 spaces (four spaces per 1,000
square feet of gross floor area) to 20 spaces (1.65 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross
floor area, reduce the side (west) setback from 10 feet to nine feet (to pavement) and
reduce the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 13 feet (to pavement), as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-402.G at
1720 Overbrook A venue. The proposal includes a 12,280 square foot fire and rescue
station. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that
the application is complete pending receipt of the following information/data:
1. Provide existing ISR and FAR;
2. Indicate the height of the existing building;
3. Provide four-sided, rendered, dimensioned, scaled elevations (indicate the color
and all materials);
4. Indicate the number of existing parking space;
5. Clarify the number of employees who will be on-site at any given time (it was
specified that there be generally 11 employees on the site in the application.
Clarify if this also refers to the number of employees who will be living at the site
during their shifts);
BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER"
January 24, 2003
Zerglenga - Page Two
.
.
6. The height listed on sheet C-4 (28.5 feet plus roof height) appears to be
inaccurate. The height of the building to the midpoint of the peak of the roof
appears to be approximately 23 feet. Provide the height of the building as
measured from grade to the mid-point of the peak of the roof;
7. Provide a breakdown of the floor area including office space, living area
(including kitchen and bathrooms) and garage and utility area (i.e. storage of
equipment including vehicles);
8. Indicate the number of fire trucks to be stored at the site at any given time;
9. Clarify how the driveways operate along Overbrook Avenue (one-way or two-
way);
10. Indicate what, if any, signage is proposed for the site - provide dimensioned,
scaled and rendered drawings; and
11. Provide the existing and anticipated value of the site;
The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLD2003-01005.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency
on February 13, 2003 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the
second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South
Myrtle A venue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus, Administrative
Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the
approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your client must be present to
answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application.
Additional comments will be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4558.
~----:;
Mark Parry
Lead Planner
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D B\FleX\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\Overbrook 1720 Fire and Rescue Station NW\Overbrook
1720 complete letter.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT
APPLICA TION
PROJECT:
CLEARWATER MALL
FIRE AND RESCUE STATION NO. 51
TBE Project No. 00083-101.00
Prepared for:
Southwest Florida Water Management District
Submitted by:
TBE GROUP, INC.
380 Park Place Boulevard, Suite 300
Clearwater, FL 33759
RECEIVED
February 2993.'~'_ __
rtn 1 R 7003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
FORM 547.27/ERP (8-94)
Rule 4OD-1.659, FAG.
J :1000831000831 01.00lDOGIPERMITSISEGTIONA.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
Section 5
FORM 547.27/ERP (8-94)
Rule 40D-1.659, FAC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Environmental Resource Permit Application
(Sections A, C and H)
Drainage Design Calculations
Geotechnical Report
Project Maps (Pocket)
Attachments: Project Construction Plans
J:I00083100083101.00IDOCIPERMITSISECTIONA.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION!
WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS!
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
JOINT APPLICATION FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT!
AUTHORIZATION TO USE
STATE OWNED SUBMERGED LANDS!
FEDERAL DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT
FORM 547.27/ERP (8-94)
Rule 40D-1.659, FAC.
J:I000831000831 01 .00lDOCIPERMITSISECTIONA.DOC
I
I
I
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE
PERMIT ApPLICATION
I
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WA TER
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
2379 BROAD STREET · BROOKSVILLE, FL 34609-6899
(904) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA WATS 1 (800) 423-1476
I
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
I
ACOEApplication#
Date Received
Proposed Project Latitude ___
ProposedProjeclLongitude ~ _'_"
DEP/WMD Application #
Date Received
Fee Received $
Fee Receipt #
I
SECTION A
I
PART 1:
Are any of the activities described in this application proposed to occur in. on. or over wetlands or other surface waters?
Dyes 0no
Is this application being filed by or on behalf of an entity eligible for a fee reduction? Dyes 0 no
I
PART 2:
A. Type of Environmental Resource Permit Requested (check at least one)
D Noticed General - include information requested in Section B.
D Standard General (single family dwelling) - include information requested in Sections C and D.
D Standard General (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E.
o Standard General (minor systems) - include information requested in Sections C and H.
D Standard General (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I.
D Individual (single family dwelling) - include information requested in Sections C and D.
D Individual (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E.
D Individual (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I.
D Conceptual - include information requested in Sections C and E.
D Mitigation Bank (construction) - include information requested in Section C and F.
(If the proposed mitigation bank involves the construction of a surface water management system requiring another
permit listed above, check the appropriate box and submit the information requested by the applicable section.)
D Mitigation Bank (conceptual) - include information requested in Section C and F.
I
I
I
B. Type of activity for which you are applying (check at least one)
o Construction or operation of a new system, including dredging or filling in. on or over wetlands and other surface
waters. (If reapplying for an expired, denied or withdrawn permit! application, please provide previous permit
# .)
D Alteration or operation of an existing system which was not previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP.
D Modification of a system previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP. Provide previous permit #
and check applicable modification type.
D Alteration of a system D Extension of permit duration D Abandonment of a system
D Construction of additional phases of a system D Removal of a system
I
I
I
C. Are you requesting authorization to use State Owned Submerged Lands. Dyes 0 no
If yes, include the information requested in Section G.
I
D. For activities in, on or over wetlands or other surface waters, check type of federal dredge and fill permit requested:
D Individual D Programmatic General D General D Nationwide 0 Not Applicable
E. Are you claiming to qualify for an exemption? Dyes 0 no
If yes, provide rule number if known
I
I
I
FORM 547.27/ERP(8-94)A
Page 1 of 5
J:\00083\00083101.00\DOC\PERMITS\SECTIONA.OOC
I
I
I
PART 3:
A. OWNER(S) OF LAND B. APPLICANT (IF OTHER THAN OWNER)
NAME NAME
Rowland Herald Same as Owner
COMPANY AND TITLE COMPANY AND TITLE
City of Clearwater, Fire Chief
ADDRESS ADDRESS
610 Franklin Street
CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP
Clearwater, FL 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4334 TELEPHONE ( )
FAX (727) 562-4328 FAX ( )
C. AGENT AUTHORIZED TO SECURE PERMIT (IF AN D. CONSULTANT (IF DIFFERENT FROM AGENT)
AGENT IS USED)
NAME NAME
N/A Bryan L. Zarlenga, PE
COMPANY AND TITLE COMPANY AND TITLE
TBE Group, Inc.
Project ManaQer, Civil Division
ADDRESS ADDRESS
380 Park Place Boulevard
Suite 300
CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP
Clearwater, FL 33759
TELEPHONE ( ) TELEPHONE (727) 531-3505
FAX ( ) FAX (727) 539-1294
PART 4: PROJECT INFORMATION
A. Name of project, including phase if applicable: Northwest Fire & Rescue Station No. 51
B. Is this application for part of a multi-phase project? 0 yes ItI no
C. Total applicant-owned area contiguous to the project: ~ acres
D. Total project area for which a permit is sought: 1.59 acres
E. Total impervious area for which a permit is sought: 0.70 acres
F. Total area (metric equivalent for federally funded projects) of work in, on, or over wetlands or
other surface waters: ~ acres or square feet '--- hectares or _ square meters)
G. Total number of new boat slips proposed: N/A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM 547.27/ERP(B-94)A
Page 2 of 5
J:I00083100083101.00IDOCIPERMITSISECTIONA.DOC
I
I
I
PART 5: PROJECT LOCATION (use additional sheets, if needed)
County(ies) Pinellas
Section(s) 3
Section(s)
Land Grant name, if applicable
Tax Parcel Identification Number 03/29/15/43740/000/0240
Street address, road, or other location 1720 Overbrook Avenue
City, Zip Code, if applicable Clearwater
Township
Township
29S
Range 15E
Range
I
I
I
PART 6: DESCRIBE IN GENERAL TERMS THE PROPOSED PROJECT, SYSTEM, OR
ACTIVITY.
I
The new 12.280 square foot Clearwater Mall Fire & Rescue Station No. 51 is a split floor fire and
rescue facility to be constructed on an existino iunkyard parcel.
I
I
The existinQ conditions include: old metal buildinos, concrete and asphalt pavement areas. and
open space.
The existino site is primarily flat and difficult to determine existino drainaoe patters: however. it
appears the site drains overland north towards the Overbrook Ditch Systems and west towards the
I
adiacent wetland eventually discharoina to Stevenson Creek.
I
The proposed plan will maintain the existino drainaae pattern. however. a stormwater collection
system will be installed via a series of underaround pipes and inlets. The first 1/2" of rainfall from the
I
I
I
site will be treated in the three (3) stormwater (drv-retention) ponds on the site. thus discharaina
throuah a control structure which will discharae to the existina Pinellas County ditch at the northwest
corner of the proiect area. This ditch discharaes west to additional ditches that eventually outfalls to
Stevenson Creek. which is southwest of the proiect area.
I
I
I
I
I
FORM 547.27/ERP(8-94)A
Page 3 of 5
J:I00083100083101.00lDOCIPERMITSISECTIONADOC
I
I
I
PART 7:
A. If there have been any pre-application meetings for the proposed project, with regulatory staff,
please list the date(s), location(s), and names of key staff and project representatives.
Date(s) Location(s) Names
N/A
B. Please identify by number any MSSW/WRM (dredge & fill)!ERP!ACOE permits or
applications pending, issued or denied and any related enforcement actions at the
proposed project site.
Agency Date Number! Type Action Taken
C. Note: The followinq information is required for proiects proposed to occur in. on or over
wetlands that need a federal dredqe and fill permit and!or authorization to use state owned
submerqed lands. Please provide the names, addresses and zip codes of property owners
whose property directly adjoins the project (excluding applicant) and!or is located within a 500-
foot radius of the project boundary (for proprietary authorizations, if any). Please provide a
drawing identifying each owner and adjoining property lines. (Use additional sheets, if
needed).
1. N!A 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM 547.27/ERP(B-94)A
Page 4 of 5
J:IOOOB31000B3101.00IDOCIPERMITSISECTlONA.DOC
I
I
I
PART 8:
I
A. By signing this application form, I am applying, or I am applying on behalf of the owner or applicant, for the permit
and/or proprietary authorizations identified above, according to the supporting data and other incidental information
filed with this application. I am familiar with the information contained in this application, and represent that such
information is true complete and accurate. I understand that knowingly making any false statement or representation
in the application is a violation of Section 373.430, F.S. and 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. I understand this is an
application and not a permit and work prior to approval is a violation. I understand that this application and any permit
or proprietary authorization issued pursuant thereto, does not relieve me of any obligation for obtaining any other
required federal, state, water management district or local permit prior to commencement of construction. I agree, or I
agree on behalf of the owner or applicant, to operate and maintain the permitted system unless the permitting agency
authorizes transfer of the permit to a responsible operation entity.
I
I
Rowland Herald
Typed/Printed Name of Owner, Applicant or Agent
~~C:~~dd
Signature of Owner, Applicant or Agent
City of Clearwater Fire Chief
Corporate Title, if applicable
/-v~03
Date
I
B.
AN AGENT MAY SIGN ABOVE ONLY IF THE FOllOWING IS COMPLETED:
I
I hereby designate and authorize the agent listed above to act on my behalf, or on behalf of my corporation, as the agent in the
processing of this application for the permit and/or proprietary authorization indicated above; and to furnish, on request,
supplemental information in support of the application. In addition, I authorize the above-listed agent to bind me, or my
corporation, to perform any requirement which may be necessary to procure the permit or authorization indicated above.
I
Typed/Printed Name of Owner or Applicant
Corporate Title, if applicable
Signature of Owner or Applicant
Date
I
I
C. PERSON AUTHORIZING ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY MUST COMPLETE THE
FOllOWING:
I
I either own the property described in this application or I have legal authority to allow access to the property, and I consent, after
receiving prior notification, to any site visit on the property by agents or personnel from the Department of Environmental
Protection, the Southwest Florida Water Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers necessary for the review
and inspection of the proposed project specified in this application. I authorize these agents or personnel to enter the property as
many times as may be necessary to make such review and inspection. Further, I agree to provide entry to the project site for such
agents or personnel to monitor authorized work if a permit is granted.
I
Rowland Herald
Typed/Printed Name
z;?~~r'.;,z.~~
Signature
City of Clearwater Fire Chief
Corporate Title, if applicable
/~O::J
Date
I
D.
I certify that the engineering features of this surface water management system have been designed by me or under
my responsible charge and in my professional opinion conform with sound engineering principles and all applicable
rule nd specifications. I further agree that I or my engineering firm will furnish the applicanUpermittee with a set of
g . //ines and hies for mainte nce and operation of the surface water management system.
~ Bryan L. Zarlenqa 52167
Slg ture f En~" e'~r .cord Name (please type) FL P.E. No.
,-.....
TBE Group, Inc.
. . 'jA ~ F I X S Company Name
!I'VI ~D':7 380 Park Place Boulevard. Suite 300
Company Address
I
By:
I
I
Date:
Phone: (727) 531-350:;
Clearwater. FL 33759
City, State, Zip
I
I
FORM 547.27IERP(8-94)A
Page 5 of 5
J:\00083\00083101.00IDOCIPERMITSISECTIONA.DOC
I
I
I
ENVIRONMENT AL RESOURCE
PERMIT ApPLICATION
I
I
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
WA TER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
2319 BROAD STREET. BROOK5VILLE, FL 34609-6899
(9041 196-1211 OR FLORIDA W A T5 1 (800) 423-1416
SECTION C
I
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF APPLICATION
This information is required in addition to that required in other sections of the application. Please submit five
copies of this notice of receipt of application and all attachments. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL INFORMATION ON
8 %" BY 11" PAPER.
Project Name: Northwest Fire & Rescue Station No. 51
County: Pinellas
Owner: City of Clearwater
Applicant: City of Clearwater - Rowland Herald, Fire Chief
Applicant Address: 610 Franklin Street. Clearwater. FL 33756
I
I
I
1. Indicate the project boundaries on a USGS quadrangle map, reduced or enlarged as necessary to
legibly show the entire project. If not shown on the quadrangle map, provide a location map, that
shows a north arrow, a graphic scale, Section(s), Township(s), and Range(s), and detail sufficient to
allow a person unfamiliar with the site to find it. See attached USGS Quadrangle Map
I
I
2. Provide the names of all wetland or other surface waters that would be dredged, filled, impounded,
diverted, drained or would receive discharge (either directly or indirectly), or would otherwise be
impacted by the proposed activity, and specify i(they are in an Outstanding Florida Water or Aquatic
Preserve: Discharge will be to vacant land adjacent west of the City property, which is
following the same drainage pattern as existing conditions. The land historically slopes west
to southwest to a wetland area adjacent to Stevenson Creek.
I
3. Attach a depiction (plan and section views), which clearly shows the works or other facilities proposed
to be constructed. The depiction must use a scale sufficient to show the location and type of works.
See enclosed construction plans.
I
I
4. Briefly describe the proposed project (such as "construct a deck with boatshelter", "replace two
existing culverts", "construct surface water management system to serve 150 acre residential
development"): Construct dry stormwater retention systems to service 12,197 SF fire and
rescue facility at the southwest intersection of N. Betty Lane and Overbrook Avenue.
I
I
5. Specify the acreage of wetlands or other surface waters, if any, that are proposed to be disturbed,
filled, excavated, or otherwise impacted by the proposed activity: N/A
6. Provide a brief statement describing any proposed mitigation for impacts to wetlands and other
surface waters: N/A
I
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Application Name:
Application Number:
Office where the application can be inspected:
I
I
NOTE TO NOTICE RECIPIENT: The information in this notice has been submitted by the applicant and has not been verified by the
outhwest Florida Water Management District. It may be subject to change prior to final agency action.
FORM 541.21/ERPIB-941(
Page 1 of 1
J \0008l \0008l 101.00\OO[\P E RMIT S \ SECTIONC WPD
I
I
I
I
I
I
ENVIRONMENT AL RESOURCE
PERMIT ApPLICATION
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
WA TER t1ANAGEt1ENT DISTRICT
2379 BROAD STREET. BROOKSVILLE, FL 34609-6899
(904) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA W A TS 1 1800) 423-1476
SECTION H
INFORMATION FOR STANDARD GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE
PERMITS FOR MINOR SURFACE WATER SYSTEMS
I
To obtain a Standard General Permit for a Minor Surface Water Management System, the project must meet all of the
requirements of Section A, Part 1 OR one of the requirements of Section A, Part 2 and both of the requirements of
Section A, Part 3. Indicate which thresholds apply to your project and submit the information requested in Section B.
I
A.
Project Thresholds
I
Part 1.
v"
v"
v"
I
I
I
Part 2.
I
I
Part 3.
v"
I
,./
v"
The total land area does not equal or exceed 10 acres;
The area of impervious surface will not equal or exceed two acres;
Any activities to be conducted in, on or over wetlands or other surface waters will consist of less
than 100 square feet of dredging or filling;
The activities will not utilize pumps for storm water management;
The activities will not utilize storm drainage facilities larger than one 24 inch diameter pipe or its
hydraulic equivalent;
Discharges from the site will meet State water quality standards, and the surface water management
system will meet the applicable technical criteria for stormwater management in the Basis of Review;
The proposed building floors will be above the 100-year flood elevations;
The surface water management system can be effectively operated and maintained, and;
The proposed activities will not cause significant adverse impacts to occur individually or cumulatively.
v"
v"
v"
v"
400-4.051(4) - DISTRICT PERMIT RECEIVED PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1, 1984
400-4.051(6) - NOTICED DRI/PHASED PROJECT APPROVED PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1, 1984
400-4.051(1) - NORMAL AND NECESSARY FARMING AND FORES TRY
v"
Discharges from the site will meet State water quality standards, and the surface water management
system will meet the applicable technical criteria for stormwater management in the Basis of Review
described in Rule 400-4.091(1), and
The Surface Water Management System can be effectively operated and maintained.
I
1.
B. Technical and Legal Information
I
I
FORM 541.21/ERPIB-94IH
I
Provide a copy of the boundary survey and/or a legal description and acreage of the total land area of
contiguous property owned or controlled by the applicant, including the project site.
See attached survey and legal descriptions.
Pag.1al2
J \ 000 8 3 \ 0008310 1.00 \ 0 D[\PERMITS \ SECTIDNH. WPD
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM 541.21/ERPI8-94JH
I
2.
Provide recent aerials, legible for photo interpretation with a scale of 1" 400' or more detailed, with
total land, project area and anyon-site wetlands delineated.
See enclosed Aerial Maps attached in the Engineering Report.
3.
Provide a detailed topographic map (with contours) of the site and adjacent hydrologically related area.
The location and descript-ion of bench marks (minimum of one per major water control structure) should be
included.
See enclosed Aerial Maps, and Construction and Survey Drawings.
4.
Describe the location, size (in acres) and type of anyon-site wetlands or other surface waters.
N/A
5.
Provide the project site development plan and acreage of the total area of impervious surface,
See attached construction drawings: Total impervious area = 30,492 SF (0.10 acres).
6.
Provide the Surface Water Management System design plans, calculat-ions and reports signed and sealed
by a Florida Registered Professional Engineer, as required by law.
See attached construction drawings and Engineering Report with drainage design calculations.
1.
Provide construction drawings signed and sealed by the design engineer showing the location and details
of the Surface Water Management System including but not limited to any preserved wetlands, lakes,
culverts, pipes, under drains, ex filtration trenches, discharge structures, pumps and related facilities such
as paving, grading and erosion or sediment control measures to be employed. See construction drawings.
8.
Indicate type of water quality treatment system used:
Wet detention
,/ On-line retent-ion
On-line detent-ion w/effluent filtration
Off -line retention
Off-line ex filtration
Other (explain)
9. If a Water Use Permit has been issued for the project, state the permit number,
N/A
10. Indicate how any exist-ing wells located within the project site will be utilized or abandoned,
N/A
11. Provide a letter or other current evidence of potential acceptance by the operat-ion and maintenance
ent-ity, if the ent-ity is to be a public body such as a city or drainage district-. If the entity is a
homeowners or other associat-ion, final draft documents verifying either the present or imminent existence
of such an organizat-ion and its ability to accept operation and maintenance responsibility are required.
See attached letter.
Page 2 of 2
J I 00 0 831 00 083101.00 100 [\PERMIT S ISE [TIONH. WPO
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRAINAGE DESIGN
CALCULATIONS
PROJECT:
NORTHWEST FIRE & RESCUE STATION NO. 51
CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
Prepared for:
Southwest Florida Water Management District
Prepared by:
r:E
TBE Group, Inc.
380 Park Place Boulevard, Suite 300
Clearwater, Florida 33759
TBE Project No. 00083-101-00
February 17,2003
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T ABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Page
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............. .............................. .... ........ ............ ........ ......... .......... ... ...1
EXISTING CONDITIONS.... ........ ... .............. ... .... .......... ...... ................... ...... ........ ....... .........1
PROPOSED CONDITIONS ......... ........................... ..................... ....................... ............... 2-4
A. Stormwater Management Facilities
B. Water Quality (SWFWMD Requirements)
C. Water Quantity (SWFWMD Requirements)
D. Stormwater Runoff
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES.. ... .... ................. .......................... ... .... ... ...... ....... ....... ... ..... ... .....4
A. Endwall Types
B. Entrance Loss Coefficient (Ke)
C. Storm Drains
D. Minimum Culvert Size
E. Maximum Pipe Lengths without Access Structures
F. M'3.nning's Roughness Coefficient
METHODS USED TO ESTIMATE DESIGN DISCHARGE .............................................4
A. Storm Drains and Gutter Drains
B. Stormwater Management Facilities
METHODS USED TO DELINEATE DRAINAGE AREAS...............................................5
CONCLUSION....................... ... ............. ....... ... ......... ............... ..... .......... ..... ..... .... ........... ... ....5
TBE Group, Inc.
J:\00083\000831 01 OO\DOC\Reports\ENGREPORT-revl doc
11
February 2003
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LIST OF GRAPHIC FIGURES (SECTION 2)
FIGURE DESCRIPTION
1 VICINITY MAP
2 USGS QUADRANGLE
3 SCS SOILS SURVEY MAP
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION
1 NODE DIAGRAM
LIST OF CALCULATIONS (SECTION 2)
NO. DESCRIPTION
1. EXISTING CONDITION 25- YEAR STORM (DRAINAGE AREAS)
2 PROPOSED CONDITION 25- YEAR STORM (DRAINAGE AREAS)
3 PROPOSED CONDITIONS 25- YEAR STORM (BASIN AREAS)
4 TREATMENT/POND VOLUME CALCULATIONS
5 POND VOLUME GRAPH
6 RETENTION POND RECOVERY-REFINED METHOD (WATER QUALITY)
7 ICPR V. 2.2 POND ROUTING
8 STORM SEWER/ROOF DRAIN SCHEMATIC
9 STORM SEWER/ROOF DRAIN 10- YR STORM EVENT ICPR CALCS
ATTACHMENTS (SECTION 2)
NO. DESCRIPTION
1 FIGURE D-5 - SWFWMD 24 HR/25 YR RETURN PERIOD RAIN FALL MAP
2 TABLE 2-2A-RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS FOR URBAN AREAS
3 AERIAL CONTOUR MAP
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY (SECTION 3)
SWFWMD AERIAL (SECTION 4)
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS (SECTION 5)
TBE Group, Inc.
J:\00083\00083101.00\DOC\Reports\ENGREPORT-revl.doc
11
February 2003
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Clearwater's Northwest Fire and Rescue Station No. 51 is a proposed fire and rescue
facility to be constructed on approximately 1.59 acres of land in Section 3, Township 29 South,
Range 15 East, at 1720 Overbrook Avenue, in the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida.
The property is located at the southwest intersection of Overbrook Avenue, and North Betty
Lane. See the Site Vicinity Map and USGS Quadrangle Map, Figure 1 and Figure 2,
respectively, located in Section 2 of this Engineering Report.
The project area is bordered to the north by Overbrook Avenue, commercial and residential
property; residential property to the south; North Betty Lane and residential property to the east;
and City of Clearwater commercial property adjacent to the west side of the project area. West
of the City's property is wetlands and Stevenson Creek.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The existing site is currently a junkyard facility. The total project area consists of approximately
1.59 acres. The site consists of dilapidated buildings, and concrete and asphalt surfaces, with
some open space and few trees. The existing conditions of the project area are as follows:
ITEM
AREA
IMPERVIOUS AREA
OPEN SPACE
POND AREA
EXISTING BASIN
1.59 AC
1.31 AC
0.28 AC
o
The existing drainage pattern generally runs north and west on the property. Adjacent to the
north is an existing Pinellas County ditch system. Adjacent to the west of the project area is a
City owned parcel, which is an extended area of the existing junkyard facility. Both the ditch
and westerly-owned parcels flow overland to the southwest into adjacent wetland area. The
wetland area is bordered at the south end by Stevenson Creek (see Construction Drawings,
Aerial Site Plan).
The United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil Survey for
Pinellas County identifies the soil at the site to be represented by Made Land (Ma) (see Soil
Survey Exhibit). Tierra Geotechnical and Materials Engineering, results of Double Ring
Infiltration Test along with associated hand auger borings in general accordance with ASTM
standards are located in Section 3 of this Engineering Report. Tierra indicated that the
groundwater was encountered at approximately three feet below existing grade. Based on the
subsurface material encountered, Tierra recommends over excavating two to three feet of the
existing site and replacing the material as needed with clean, engineered fill. They estimate that
the seasonal high groundwater table will be encountered at a depth of approximately one foot
below existing grade. Therefore, the seasonal high water table for design is assumed to be
elevation 18.0 feet, which is consistent with the soil boring location and geotechnical
recommendation. Based on the results of the DR! test, the infiltration rate is estimated to be 10
feet/day.
TBE Group, Inc.
J:I00083100083101.00IDOCIReportsIENGREPORT_revl.doc
January 2003
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
The design criteria for this proj ect are based on general conformance with the current City of
Clearwater Stormwater Manual and the requirements of the Southwest Florida Water
Management District (SWFWMD). A SWFWMD Individual Environmental Resource Permit
has been included in Section 1 of this Engineering Report.
The proposed conditions include the construction of a 12,280 square foot fire station, associated
parking, driveway, and stormwater management system. The proposed site modifications are as
follows:
ITEM EXISTING BASIN
AREA 1.59 AC
IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.70 AC
GREEN AREA 0.57 AC
POND AREA 0.32 AC
The proposed site will continue to maintain existing drainage patterns while collecting runoff
through a drainage collection system directed through three dry retention stormwater ponds as
shown on the Paving, Grading, and Drainage Plan. Stormwater management systems must
comply with the rules of SWFWMD and the City of Clearwater per the latest update of August
23,2002. The stormwater management for dry retention systems will comply with SWFWMD
rules for water quality and quantity. The basic drainage criteria are as follows:
A. Stormwater Management Facilities
1. Total treatment volume shall again be available within 24 hours from a major design
storm event, however, only that volume which can again be available within 36 hours
may be counted as part of the volume required for water quality storage.
2. The design of the system must be such that the water velocities and associated flow path
through the storage pond do not cause the accumulated pollutants to be flushed out of the
treatment pond up to the 25-year, 24-hour design storm.
3. Perimeter maintenance and operation easements, with a minimum width of 20 feet and
slopes no steeper than 4: 1 (horizontal : vertical), should be provided landward of the
control elevation water line. Linear stormwater management facilities may be permitted
to have a maintenance and operation easement on one side, only, if the entire site can be
maintained from this provision. Widths less than 20 feet are allowed when it can be
demonstrated that equipment can enter and perform the necessary maintenance for the
system.
B. Water Quality Results
The proposed dry retention ponds were designed to retain the treatment volume of one-half inch
over the entire 1.59 acre basin area. The criteria for the drainage area is defined as follows:
TBE Group, Inc.
J:\00083\000831 0 I .00\DOC\Reports\ENGREPOR T -revl.doc
2
January 2003
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a) All proposed paved areas.
b) All proposed building areas.
c) All proposed grassed areas within the basin boundaries.
d) Pond bottom elevation shall be at least one foot above the seasonal high water table
to allow for positive percolation.
e) The pond is to recover within a five-day period with a safety factor of two applied to
the draw down calculations.
Treatment Volume Required:
Basin Area = 69,224 SF = 1.59 AC
69,224 SF x ((112")/12) = 2,884 CF = 0.066 AC-FT
Treatment Volume Provided:
Top Area of Treatment = 7,994 SF ELEV. 20.4
Bottom Area of Treatment = 6,926 SF ELEV.20.0
Depth of Pond (for Treatment) = 0.40 FT
Treatment Volume = (7,994 + 6,926)/2 x 0040 = 2,984 CF = 0.069 AC-FT
The treatment volume required for recovery will be adequate. Ponds Version 3.2.0068 was used
for the water quality draw down calculations. The water quality volume staged to an elevation of
20.4, which is equal to the excess run-off weir elevation, and will percolate to a dry condition in
less than ten hours, providing for the desired recovery. See the Ponds results for the water
quality drawdown calculation located in Section 2 of this Engineering Report.
C. Water Quantity (SWFWMD Requirements)
The Impermeable Surface Ratio (ISR) is approximately Yz of the existing conditions. Since the
proposed impervious area is less than pre-conditions, that is, Cnpost < Cnpre, attenuation was not
required. ICPR Version 2.2 was used to route the 24-hour, 25-year storm through the stormwater
management system for the proposed conditions. See all calculations in Section 2 of this
Engineering Report. The stormwater run-off for pre-conditions, and post development discharge
is, 8.57 cfs, and 6.02 cfs, respectively.
D. Stormwater Runoff
As shown on the attached Node Diagram, Exhibit 1, Basin 4 collects 0.81 acres of the site runoff
via a series of drainage collection pipes and directs the flow to a proposed pond (node 4) at the
southeastern portion of the site. From this pond (node 4) an equalizer pipe is connected to an
inlet (node 3). The equalizer pipe from node 3 connects to another proposed dry retention pond
(node 2) located at the southwestern portion of the site, which collects 0.27 acres (Basin 2) of
runoff via a swale. Basin 1 collects 0.52 acres of site runoff via a series of drainage collection
pipes and directs the flow to a proposed pond (node 1) at the northwestern portion of the site.
The southwest pond (node 2) is connected to the northwest pond (node 1) via a 24-inch RCP
stornl pipe.
TBE Group, Inc.
J:\00083\00083 J 01.00\DOC\Reports\ENGREPORT-revl.doc
3
January 2003
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The proposed retention ponds were designed to have the bottom elevation at 20.0 and top of
banks at 21.5. The ponds will be approximately eight to nine inches deep at Design High Water
(DHW) for the 24-hour, 25-year storm. The discharge from the ponds was routed through an
FDOT Type "D" modified inlet located in the northwest pond (node 1).
An oil skimmer will be provided around the proposed outfall structure (see pond control
structure detail on the Drainage Details sheet). The outfall structure will have a 45 LF, 15 inch
RCP discharge pipe, which will connect to an existing Pinellas County ditch at the northwest
comer of the project area, and on the south side of Over brook Avenue. (see Paving, Grading, and
Drainage Plan). The stormwater flows form this ditch west to another ditch located at the south
side of Overbrook Avenue, and eventually flows west to southwest to Stevenson Creek, which is
located southwest of the project area.
DRAJNAGESTRUCTURES
The following drainage structures have been provided:
A. Endwall Types
1. Mitered End Section, FDOT Index No. 272.
2. Side Drain Mitered End Section, FDOT Index No. 273
B. Entrance Loss Coefficient (Ke)
1. Mitered End Section - 0.7
c. Storm Drains
1. A design storm frequency of 10 years has been used to comply with City of Clearwater
requirements.
2. A minimum longitudinal grade within the inverted crown of the paved areas of 0.3
percent has been designed for shallow swale conveyance.
D. Minimum Culvert Size
1. Storm Drain
14 x 23 inch
E. Maximum Pipe Lengths without Access Structures
1. I8-inch Pipe 300 feet
2. 24-inch to 36-inch Pipe 400 feet
3. 42 inch and larger 500 feet
F. Manning's Roughness Coefficient
1. Concrete Pipe 0.012
(Concrete is proposed as the primary pipe material on the project)
METHODS USED TO ESTIMATE DESIGN DISCHARGE
A. Storm Drains
TBE Group, Inc.
.1:\00083\00083101.00\DOC\Reports\ENGREPORT-revl.doc
4
January 2003
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1. The rational method may be used for all projects, which have major basins not exceeding
10 acres.
B. Stormwater Management Facilities
1. The SCS Unit Hydrograph Method has been used in the ICPR model for dynamic
modeling of the pond system.
2. Shape Factor
256 (Flat terrain with slopes less than five percent)
3. Rainfall Distribution
Florida Modified
4. Design Rainfall Depths
7.5 inches (lO-year storm event - storm drains)
9.0 inches (25-year storm event - stormwater
management facilities)
METHODS USED TO DELINEATE DRAINAGE AREAS
A. Field Reviews and Surveys
B. SWFWMD Aerial Contour Maps
CONCLUSION
The proposed development will enhance the surrounding properties, and will not impact the
surrounding environment in a negative manner by the provision of new stormwater management
ponds.
The proposed conditions, Impermeable Surface Ratio (ISR), is approximately Y2 of the existing
conditions. The proposed impervious area at the site will be approximately 0.70 acres, which is
less than the existing conditions of 1.31 acres.
The proposed development stormwater discharge (Qpost) is 6.02 cfs, which is less than the
existing conditions stormwater run-off (Qpre) of8.57 cfs.
The stormwater management system will be provided to satisfy the treatment requirements of
SWFWMD and the City of Clearwater.
The City of Clearwater will be responsible for managing all stormwater management facilities.
TBE Group, Inc.
J:I00083100083101.00IDOCIReportsIENGREPORT-revl.doc
5
January 2003
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 1
VICINITY MAP
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROJECT
LOCA TI ON
~
<>
~
z
<>
:>
J!!
iii
r
~
<>
<>
o
;;;
.,
<>
<>
<>
:;
.;:;
s
'"
~
;;:
g
'"
bl
.,
<>
~
.;:;
S
F
'"
<>
N
N
o
IE
.;:;
t-
'"
<>
UCer1se No. 384-J
I
53
T295 R15E
:\ <J
I \ !
\ .
I \ \
, \
~-~-\~
\ \
~, \
\j@
I
Egmont Key Notionol ~
W~dl;fe Refuge ~
Pa~if:1e~~ona 0
AnDa Ilarla
IfDlmeO
Beach
Bradentoll
Beach
VICINITY MAP
NT5
TBE GROUP, INC.
Civil Engineering .Transportation -En vironmen tal-Planning
CLEARWATER TMtPA
380 Pork Place BMI 102 W. 'Mllting Street
(727) 53'-3505 (813) 221-0048
PROJECT: NORTHWEST FIE /IJtC) FESClE STATlON NO. 51
APPUCANT: CITY OF a..EARWATER
COUNTY:
PN:U..AS COlNTY
SHEET:
-.J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 2
USGS QUANDRANGLE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~
'"
vi
'"
1Il
::J
/'
I 1Il
r-
iD
r
i:j
/'
'"
~
<5
I ;;;
'"
'"
'"
'"
/'
..,
'"
'"
'"
'"
/'
I '"
<
u
.:.;
W
'"
<
I 9
"'
I
I
I
I
S3
T29S
R15E
'i..
..~ r'."
. Oli'
I:t
...
...
~
c-
it
..J
. f i
L.~.~.~-: .. ~! ::.:I!I) .' ~r~".---"~~:ril<:
.' ~ > ,. ,. . t-t I " ,I,.
~,' : ; ~ 'l ~- ~";:f l ;,1 r , 1
-'--=~~---i-;-tT l~ r-J!~L; ','~ ~~~__~~_ _
i ~.*.,~ l' . - - . ~;' . ~ ~Hii"7',",:~~~
! 'f;.." '1'1 I I ,~.~ 1i~~t"~Lf"_
?:'-. ' 1'~t~ h ! i- I ~ 'N . ;: ;~~ ----~-<~---~~.,-:%,:-'-::--.- -- ~ ~
""',. r~,v...:;. ~r'''''_''C' 'A~ - ~.;,.::-, r
."/ l~#~"i'~'>':'::: ~;1"1Ji1j,= :~f'.!l"{~r .~=:;
.' l:;.,r(~}.:~~.~.3r. ...,J.t. \\~. f, .~t 'S. '1,,1 ~~.= j . /.J::~::J~' . 'C;; ". H ; l...
f --- ..rXliI- ~"'\'3~e"'. .\ ,," J -" 'nr" . ~- ~"'-L.l ., "",,;,d- '..'
,.,,' :1. .'. If. "j '.I.....'~.~.. ~..'.... '\'J~ .,-' ~I. , 11;...........=.l. r.~.~c.....,~. lScI,r
I v f I 1'1 ~ _! h alc_.__ _ . ~ SpbSillt! r ;.J: r'~. ........... I'f >) C": ~,_.~ --'J' " -~..~ L~1,........ 11 - ..1" ~ (-'11~';.
:./ ; ,'''~' ; ..-... , '...... -.PROJECT .. ,: .='>""'T fj"'lo.--;"'; ,LaI<.. 'il<ti'r~
'.' I" to.'!_ _ f- ~F.' ,f I '.__00____ 'li :'I~rk.".
/U4:"P'Il~"'I,.."cc~1! LOCA TION..~! t' ,\~~<~~~sdJ 'I.
~.'~{i:~ ..::"}~i#'~":l ~~TL~.l.;.~ .~'fX~f:~.- _O~ ~ r;-r:.t...
1- '''',........; ,r.
:\,'I!ri f;~lf' ; taL" t ' -i "- q --) 'I
-, )" /...; sc~/N,QLtl} - ~ ,I..~,., .. :-~ ",1" r,~.:~-:'.'r,:-.~\~_-,h~~z
"~i~J:'tr~.t- I -"-; " ~ ;;.... '
~Ir""f'~ ,1''''''-~. _4'"1.---- 1~ ..-- '.t, Uf.r;;;>: t ~J .::-_::_="~;-",'.!t~ _~,:':,::;;_.
~i ,'!/' /1 .,L i . :. ......G~t.y. JFI"~~r?~.." .,t."
~i :"I/.~~f l~... . ;J~"'Ksy"'..:.+1"~~ !:"bl,~,," ,I ~-....~.t '
0=1i, ~l,...".....!.. ,;...,1,'" __~J_ ..~,,!(: ' " .. ,'.J
I ~ . . ' !:...:F...~l: ".~")\.'
i: . I. Ill:'... JL
''=1-c=...:!: "'t'ifE';.,,.tihl>..na. I
:' r-' rL-:, $.: ." .. \: Id' Cc.
i;' St,-'l;;-~~:;?"= ;/CIt. Conftr 'I 'f
-~II,:~i~J....}4 ";:~i...{CLB.1W~
i ,:>~..'I I i [;~:];7"\ ",' ... :.: "'~(\;=r' "~;:;,
.1
Light
.,;....'1'
.
L !!:~.l'-FI
F (-[..1.
I
I
Jill
"
i"
1;.':
" ! -,
~
<
U
1Il
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE
MAP
SCALE APPROX. 1: 2,000
2l
~
w
'"
F
..,
o
IE
PROJECT: NORTHWEST fILE AJII) REsaE STATION NO. 51
APPUCANT: aTY OF ClEAAWAlEA
"-
"-
N
'"
TBE GROUP, INC.
Civil Engineering. Transporta lion -En y;ronmen tal- Planning
CLEARWA 1ER TAIJPA
380 Pari< Place Blvd 102 W. Whitin9 Street
(727) 531~3505 (B13) 221~OO'B
SHEer:
~
<
'"
License No. 38+3
COUNTY:
f'tB.LAS COUNTY
PINELLAS COUNTY.
PI N ELLAS COU NTY.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Exhibit 1
NODE DIAGRAM
TAMPA BAY ENGINEERING, INC.
Civil Engineering · Transportation · Environmental. Planning
tBJECT' )JOfZ7i-1iVe sr FII'E! R(f!;"$4ue Sr;.-Tf"A No. 51
NDDe M-AE
I X I 8i IN G- C.~tJ??1 "'(:~E!Y .5t :
I . I'~IS-TIN G~~..r'0
l5"9 Ale
I CN-;;:;;;96..lIZ
7c .:= 10 ,rn./n.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~RDPO<SI;D Oo~i-r; ONS
Pay!): 20.0' 0.055"(;.
20.S' ".~7 AL
21.0' tJ.o79Ac..
t).5' !y.,Oc;i/ Ac.
COMP. BY: Me"
CHK. BY
DATE: t -/'1"03
SHEET NO.:
PROJ. NO.: CIooSJ-lat . C/o
K'IJ N - 0 FF ~A S'f:,~ .tJ,-,) II y~ Dt!Hl,4Pif
0.52 A'C,.
eN:: E~ 7. f.?7
Ie::; 10 r>")1t1.
(
j
~ o.27/Je-
13 po. ~\Nl
c,.) == 9/.? S
1C;::; /() mr'n.
t?t'.d.l~ :
20.01 0.011 A Co
Zo.L{' ().oi~ ik
2.1.0' (}. Ol(... '" c..
l/tS?
0.033 Ac.
11)t6!,.J 41
POr/l) :
0, f3( 4c..
~"'': e {. q (;}
Ie. ~ 1&1 m/n.
/
20.0
2,0.5'
2/. 0 (
c). 0'12 Ac..
&i. 10 7 A ~
O. /2 '3 A~
o. /39 Ac
L/.5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Calculations
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TBE
TAMPA BAY ENGINEERING, INC.
Civil Engineering Transportation Environmental Planning
Subject: Existing Condition 25 Year Storm
NORTHWEST FIRE STATION NO. 51
Drainage Areas:
Compo By:
Chk. By:
Date:
Sheet No.
Proj. No.
Weiqhted SCS Curve Number Calculation (Existinq)
Land Use Hyd. Gr. Area (Ac) CN Weighted CN
D 0.38 98 37.24
D 0.28 89 24.92
D 0.93 98 91.14
i 1.59 t=i 96.42
Buildings
Open Space (fair condition)
Paved
ITotal
Weighted Curve Number (CN) = 96.42
25 Year - 24 Hour Rainfall Depth (P) =
9 Inches
SCS Runoff Volume Calculation
Potential Storage Abstraction (S) = (1 000/CN)-1 0 = 0.37
Runoff Depth (Q) = ((P - 0.2 S)^2) 1 (P + 0.8 S) = 8.57 Inches
25 Year - 24 Hour Rainfall Volume from Drainaqe Area
V=A*Q/12=
1.14 Ac/Ft
J:\00083\000831 01.00\DOC\Calcs\[fs51_ SCS _ CN.xls]Existing 25
1/22/200321 :37
M. Giuliani
1/22/2003
00083-101.00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TBE
TAMPA BAY ENGINEERING, INC.
Compo By:
Chk. By:
Date:
Sheet No.
Proj. No.
Civil Engineering Transportation Environmental Planning
Subject: Proposed Condition 25 Year Storm
NORTHWEST FIRE STATION NO. 51
Drainage Areas:
WeiQhted SCS Curve Number Calculation (ExistinQ)
Land Use Hyd. Gr. Area (Ac) CN Weighted CN
0.280 98 27.44
0.630 61 38.43
0.260 100 26.00
0.420 98 41.16
i 1.590 d 83.67
Buildinos
Open Space
Pond
Paved and Sidewalk
ITotal
B
Weighted CUNe Number (CN) = 83.67
25 Year - 24 Hour Rainfall Depth (P) =
9 Inches
SCS Runoff Volume Calculation
Potential Storage Abstraction (S) = (1000/CN)-10 =
1.95
Runoff Depth (Q) = ((P - 0.2 S)^2) I (P + 0.8 S) =
7.02 Inches
25 Year - 24 Hour Rainfall Volume from Drainaqe Area
V = A * Q I 12 = 0.930 Ac/Ft
Net ON Site Compensating Detention Storage Volume Required
Proposed Vol. - Existing Vol. =
-0.205 Ac/Ft
Water Quality Treatment Volume Required (first 1/2")
Water Quality Treatment Vol.
(Drainage Area 112) * 0.50 =
0.066 Ac 1Ft
J:\00083\000831 01.00\DOC\Calcs\[fs51_ SCS _ CN.xls]Existing 25
1/22/200321 :37
M. Giuliani
1/22/2003
00083-101.00
I
I
I TBE
I TAMPA BAY ENGINEERING, INC. Camp. By: M. Giuliani
Civil Engineering Transportation Environmental Planning Chk. By:
Date: 1/22/2003
I Subject: Proposed Condition 25 Year Storm Sheet No.
BASINS Proj. No. 00083-101.00
I NORTHWEST FIRE STATION NO. 51
BASIN 1
I Weighted SCS Curve Number Calculation (ExistinCl)
Land Use Hyd. Gr. Area (Ac) CN Weighted CN
Impervious 0.280 98 27.44
I Pervious B 0.150 61 9.15
Pond B 0.090 100 9.00
I ITotal I I 0.520 d 87.67 I
BASIN 2
I Weiqhted SCS Curve Number Calculation (Existinq)
Land Use Hyd. Gr. Area (Ac) CN Weighted CN
Impervious 0.120 98 11.76
Pervious B 0.120 61 7.32
I Pond B 0.030 100 3.00
ITotal I I i==i I
0.270 81.78
I BASIN 3
Weiqhted SCS Curve Number Calculation (Existinq)
Land Use Hyd. Gr. Area (Ac) CN WeiQhted CN
I Impervious 0.000 98 0
Pervious 0.000 61 0.00
I ITotal I I 0.000 d 0.00 I
I BASIN 4
Weiqhted SCS Curve Number Calculation (Existinq)
Land Use Hyd. Gr. Area (Ac) CN Weighted CN
I Impervious 0.310 98 30.38
Pervious B 0.360 61 21.96
Pond B 0.140 100 14.00
I ITotal I I 0.810 d 81.90 I
J:\00083\000831 01.00\DOC\Calcs\[fs51_BASINS .xls]Proposed 25 I
I 1/22/200322:02
I
I
I NORTHWEST FIRE STATION NO. 51 TBE #: 00083-101.00
I Treatment for Pond
Basin = ~acres
I Treatment Critertia = 0.5 inches of runoff
Treatment Volume = Area x Depth /12 x 43560, cf
Treatment Volume = 1 28861 cf or I 0.0661Iac-ft
I Elev Area, sf Area, ac Incr. Vol Cum. Vol Cum.ac-ft
20.00 6926 0.1590 0 0 0.00 Batt Elev 20
I 20.20 7586 0.1742 1451 1451 0.0333 Batt Area 6926
20.40 7994 0.1835 1558 3009 0.0691 SET WEIR Top Elev 21.5
20.50 8364 0.1920 818 3827 0.0879
I 20.80 8724 0.2003 3344 6353 0.1458 Top Area 11500
21.00 9888 0.2270 1861 8214 0.1886
21.20 10291 0.2362 2018 10232 0.2349
21 .40 10700 02456 2099 12331 0.2831
I 21.50 11500 0.2640 1110 13441 03086
I
I
I
I
I
J:\00083\00083101.00\DOC\CALCS\TREA TVOL 1.xLS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~ ~~:~~~~~~~~~~i"9
I SUBJECT: WOTCtHWFiSi Fie.~/l2:el5c-(.,)E Sr/fnalll AJo. 51
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
k
~
~ 2().'2..
l::
~
:::.
'"
"J
~
20./
PlilJ.l2 JLl~~JJMe ..~A-~H
26.'
lO.~
./~-
to. 4
ZtJ,; .
~
I
/
20
o
~
0.. o'"~ AC.,F1
WA-TElL e:N~ ir t \"f
~
""I'
o.OS
VOLUMf (At..-t:/)
f'-
/'
",'"
./
/'
COMP. BY: MtG
CHK. BY
DATE: I-Z3"'~3
SHEET NO.:
PROJ. NO.: oooe3.1r;1,~
./
"f//~
'"
.r'"
,~,~,$.t#!,!t'
O,!~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PONDS Version 3.2.0068
Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method
Copyright 2000
Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
Proiect Data
Project Name: NORTHWEST FIRE/RESCUE STATION NO. 51
Simulation Description: Water Quality Drawdown Calculations
J:\00083\00083101.00\DOC\CALCS\FS51.PRM
Project Number: 00083-101-00
Engineer : Michelle C. Giuliani
Supervising Engineer: Bryan Zarlenga, P.E.
Date: 01-22-2003
Aquifer Data
Base Of Aquifer Elevation, [B] (ft datum):
Water Table Elevation, [WT] (ft datum):
16.00
18.00
Horizontal Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, [Kh] (ft/day):
Fillable Porosity, [n] (%):
10.00
25.00
Vertical infiltration was not considered.
Geometry Data
Equivalent Pond Length, [L] (ft):
Equivalent Pond Width, [W] (ft):
427.5
17.1
Ground water mound is expected to intersect the pond bottom
Staae vs Area Data
Stage
(ft datum)
20.00
20.50
21.00
21.50
Area
(ft2)
6926.0
8364.0
9888.0
11500.0
Ditch Data
Ditch parallel to length axis is inactive
Ditch parallel to width axis is inactive
Discharae Structures
Discharge Structure #1 is inactive
Discharge Structure #2 is inactive
NORTHWEST FIRE/RESCUE STATION NO. 51
01-22-2003 22:15:53 Page 1
I
PONDS Version 3.2.0068
Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method
Copyright 2000
Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
I
I
Scenario Input Data
Scenario 1 :: Treatment
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Hydrograph Type: Slug Load
Modflow Routing: Routed with infiltration
Treatment Volume (fP) 2886
Initial ground water level (ft datum) 18.00
Time After
Storm Event
(days)
0.100
0.250
0.500
1.000
1.500
Time After
Storm Event
(days)
2.000
2.500
3.000
3.500
4.000
I
I
I
I
I
NORTHWEST FIRE/RESCUE STATION NO. 51
01-22-2003 22:15:55 Page 3
I
I
PONDS Version 3.2.0068
Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method
Copyright 2000
Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
I
Modflow Loa
I
MODFLOW CONTROL PARAMETERS
Perimeter boundary condition: constant head
Maximum iterations of outer loop: 150
Maximum iterations of inner loop: 60
Instantanerous storage coefficient: Volumetric balance
Default head closure tolerance: .01
Default residual closure tolerance: .5
Target water budget error: 1
On failure to converge: Rerun limiting inner loop to one iteration
> Maximum number of iterations of outer loop: 500
Running Average Porosity is active
> Starting on pass: 2
> When outer iteration reaches: 50
> Number of data points: 4
Running Average Pond Stage (for discharge structures with tailwater) is active
> Starting on pass: 2
> When outer iteration reaches: 50
> Number of data points: 4
Grid size: 1000 ft (from pond centerline)
Mound Output: none
I
I
I
I
I
Begin Scenario 1 1/22/2003 22:14:20
Default GWT has been overridden. Using 18.0 ft.
End Scenario 1 1/22/2003 22: 14:20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NORTHWEST FIRE/RESCUE STATION NO. 51
01-22-2003 22:15:55 Page 4
I
I
PONDS Version 3.2.0068
Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method
Copyright 2000
Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
I
Sort-Bv-Cateaorv Report
Scenarios Considered: 1
I
Stage. Maximum
Maximum
Stage
(ft datum)
20.385
Time
(hours)
0.002 Treatment
Description
I
Scenario
Rank Number
I
Stage. Minimum
Minimum
Stage
(ft datum)
18.7 43
Time
(hours)
96.000 Treatment
Description
I
Scenario
Rank Number
I
Inflow - Rate - Maximum Positive
I
Maximum Positive
Scenario Inflow Rate
Rank Number (fP/s)
481.0000
Time
(hours)
0.002 Treatment
Description
I
I
Inflow - Rate - Maximum Negative
Maximum Negative
Scenario Inflow Rate Time
Rank Number (ft3/s) (hours) Description
None NA Treatment
Inflow - Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive
Maximum Positive
Cumulative
Scenario Inflow Volume Time
Rank Number (ft3) (hours) Description
2886.0 0.002 Treatment
Inflow - Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative
Maximum Negative
Cumulative
Scenario Inflow Volume Time
Rank Number (ft3) (hours) Description
None N.A. Treatment
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NORTHWEST FIRE/RESCUE STATION NO. 51
01-22-2003 22:15:55 Page 5
I
I
PONDS Version 3.2.0068
Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method
Copyright 2000
Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
I
Sort-Bv-Cateaorv Report (cont'd.)
Inflow - Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation
I
I
Scenario
Rank Number
Cumulative
Inflow Volume
End Of Simulation
(fP)
2886.0
I
Infiltration - Rate - Maximum Positive
I
Scenario
Rank Number
I
Maximum Positive
Infiltration Rate
(fP/s)
0.4497
Infiltration - Rate - Maximum Negative
I
Scenario
Rank Number
I
Maximum Negative
Infiltration Rate
(fP/s)
None
Time
(hours)
96.000 Treatment
Description
Time
(hours)
0.002 Treatment
Description
Time
(hours)
N.A.
Description
Treatment
Infiltration - Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive
I
Maximum Positive
Cumulative
Scenario Infiltration Volume
Rank Number (fP)
I
2886.0
Time
(hours)
12.000 Treatment
Description
Infiltration - Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative
I
I
Scenario
Rank Number
I
Maximum Negative
Cumulative
Infiltration Volume
(fP)
None
Time
(hours)
N.A. Treatment
Description
Infiltration - Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation
I
Scenario
Rank Number
I
I
Cumulative
Infiltration Volume
End Of Simulation
(fP)
2886.0
Time
(hours)
96.000
Description
Treatment
I
NORTHWEST FIRE/RESCUE STATION NO. 51
01-22-2003 22:15:55 Page 6
I
I
PONDS Version 3.2.0068
Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method
Copyright 2000
Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
I
Sort-Bv-Cateaorv Report lcont'd.)
Discharge - Rate - Maximum Positive
I
Scenario
Rank Number
Maximum Positive
Discharge Rate
(fP/s)
I
None
I
Discharge - Rate - Maximum Negative
Scenario
Rank Number
Maximum Negative
Discharge Rate
(fP/s)
I
None
I
Discharge - Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive
Maximum Positive
Cumulative
Scenario Discharge Volume
Rank Number (fP)
I
None NA
Treatment
I
Discharge - Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative
I
Maximum Negative
Cumulative
Discharge Volume
(fP)
Scenario
Rank Number
I
None
Discharge - Cumulative Volume. End of Simulation
I
Cumulative
Discharge Volume
End Of Simulation
(fP)
I
Scenario
Rank Number
0.0
I
I
I
I
Time
(hours)
N.A. Treatment
Description
Time
(hours)
NA Treatment
Description
Time
(hours)
Description
Time
(hours)
NA Treatment
Description
Time
(hours)
96.000 Treatment
Description
I
NORTHWEST FIRE/RESCUE STATION NO. 51
01-22-2003 22:15:55 Page 7
I
PONDS Version 3.2.0068
Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method
Copyright 2000
Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
I
I
Summary of Results .. Scenario 1 .. Treatment
I
Time Stage
(hours) (ft datum)
Stage
Minimum 96.000 18.74
Maximum 0.002 20.39
Inflow
Rate - Maximum - Positive 0.002
Rate - Maximum - Negative None
Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 0.002
Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None
Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 96.000
Infiltration
Rate - Maximum - Positive 0.002
Rate - Maximum - Negative None
Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive 12.000
Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None
Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 96.000
Combined Discharge
Rate - Maximum - Positive None
Rate - Maximum - Negative None
Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive None
Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative None
Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation 96.000
Discharge Structure 1 - inactive
Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled
Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled
Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled
Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled
Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled
Discharge Structure 2 - inactive
Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled
Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled
Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled
Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled
Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled
Discharge Structure 3 - inactive
Rate - Maximum - Positive disabled
Rate - Maximum - Negative disabled
Cumulative Volume - Maximum Positive disabled
Cumulative Volume - Maximum Negative disabled
Cumulative Volume - End of Simulation disabled
Pollution Abatement
36 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 36.000 19.14
72 Hour Stage and Infiltration Volume 72.000 18.85
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
Rate
(ft3/s)
Volume
(ft3)
481.0000
None
2886.0
None
2886.0
0.4497
None
2886.0
None
2886.0
None
None
None
None
0.0
disabled
disabled
disabled
disabled
disabled
disabled
disabled
disabled
disabled
disabled
disabled
disabled
disabled
disabled
disabled
2886.0
2886.0
I
NORTHWEST FIRE/RESCUE STATION NO. 51
01-22-2003 22:15:56 Page 8
I PONDS Version 3.2.0068
Retention Pond Recovery - Refined Method
I Copyright 2000
Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E.
I (wnlep U) UO!leAa13
"': "! co (0 "': "! 0 co (0
0 0 CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) CJ) co co
I N N
0
0
I
I Q)
OJ
0 co
CJ) U5
"0
C
I 0
0..
Q) en
E 0 'x
co <(
I l- N
"C >-
Q)
VI i
c. i
I cu 0
W r-- Q)
OJ
"-
VI i co
..c
> i u
I Q) i .!Q
C) i 0
cu i 0 Q)
- (0 - >
VJ- i VI ~
r::: ! I..
"C1Il .c: ::l
I I: E - E
Ota Q) ::l
O-e E ()
"C~ 0.-
I: .. L!)I- i
I cu~ "C i
VI .g Q) c
VI
Q) lU C. 0
E ~ cu ~
~ u oW :E:
I _en t;:::
0 ~ E
> Q)
Q) >
> ~
I :; ::l
cu E
~ 0 ::l
C") ()
E
~ I
I CJ I
.... 3:
0 0
- 0 ti=
0 N C
I 0- Q)
>
~
::l
0 E
::l
I .- ()
en
~
I ------- ----------------.-.- ....
0 >-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
L!) 0 L!) 0 L!) 0 L!) L!) 0
C") C") N N .- , .-
I I
(eU) sawnlO^ aA!lelnwn:::>
I NORTHWEST FIRE/RESCUE STATION NO. 51 01-22-2003 22:15:56 Page 9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [1]
Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc.
NORTHWEST FIRE/RESCUE STATION NO. 51 FILE NAME:NWFS51
FILE LOCATION: J:\00083\0008310100\DOC\CALC\ICPR\PROPREV
INPUT REPORTS 25YR-24HR STORM
********** Input Report ********************************************************
-----u-Class:
Name: BNDY
Group: BASE
Comment: OUTFALL
Node---------____________________________________________________
Base Flow (cfs): 0 Init Stage (ft): 18.8
Warn Stage (ft) : 19
NORTHWEST OF PROPERTY FROM NODE 1
Time (hrs) Stage (ft)
o 18.8
24 19
--------Class:
Name: NODE1
Group: BASE
Comment: NORTHWEST POND
Node----------___________________________________________________
Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 20.4
Warn Stage(ft): 21.5
Stage(ft) Area (ac)
17 0.001
19.9 0.005
20 0.055
20.5 0.0665
21 0.0786
21.5 0.0914
--------Class: Node--------_____________________________________________________
Name: NODE2 Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage (ft) : 20.4
Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 21.5
Comment: SOUTHWEST POND
Stage(ft) Area (ac)
16.5 0.001
19.9 0.005
20 0.0117
20.4 0.0162
20.5 0.0183
21 0.0256
21.5 0.0334
--------Class: Node---------____________________________________________________
Name: NODE3 Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage(ft): 20.4
Group: BASE Warn Stage (ft) : 22
Comment: INLET
Stage (ft)
16.7
22
Area (ac)
0.1
0.1
[Manhole, Flat Floor]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [2]
Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc.
NORTHWEST FIRE/RESCUE STATION NO. 51 FILE NAME:NWFS51
FILE LOCATION: J:\00083\0008310100\DOC\CALC\ICPR\PROPREV
INPUT REPORTS 25YR~24HR STORM
********** Input Report ********************************************************
Stage(ft) Area (ac)
17 0.001
19.9 0.005
20 0.0923
20.5 0.1072
21 0.1228
21.5 0.1389
~~~~~~~~Class: Basin~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---_~~______~_____~____~_______~______~_
Basin: BASIN1 Node: NODE1 Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr
Group: BASE
Unit Hydrograph:
Rainfall File:
Rainfall Amount (in) :
Area (ac) :
Curve #:
DCIA(%) :
-------~Class:
Name: NODE4
Group: BASE
Comment: SOUTHEAST
Node-~----~~-~--~-------~~______~______~_________________~____~~_
Base Flow(cfs): 0 Init Stage (ft) : 20.4
Warn Stage(ft): 21.5
POND
00256
FLMOD
9
0.52
87.67
o
Peak Factor: 256
Storm Duration (hrs) : 24
Concentration Time (min) : 10
Time Shift (hrs) : 0
NORTHWEST CORNER RETENTION POND
~-----~-Class: Basin-----~----~------~--------_______~_____~__________~_____~___
Basin: BASIN2 Node: NODE2 Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr
Group: BASE
Unit Hydrograph:
Rainfall File:
Rainfall Amount (in) :
Area(ac) :
Curve #:
DCIA(%) :
00256
FLMOD
9
0.27
81.78
o
Peak Factor: 256
Storm Duration(hrs): 24
Concentration Time (min) : 10
Time Shift (hrs) : 0
SOUTHWEST CORNER RETENTION POND
--~----~Class: Basin-------~----~-------~~-----~______~_________________________
Basin: BASIN4 Node: NODE4 Status: On Site Type: SCS Unit Hydr
Group: BASE
Unit Hydrograph:
Rainfall File:
Rainfall Amount (in) :
Area(ac) :
Curve #:
DCIA(%) :
00256
FLMOD
9
0.81
81. 9
o
Peak Factor: 256
Storm Duration (hrs) : 24
Concentration Time (min) : 10
Time Shift (hrs) : 0
SOUTHEAST CORNER RETENTION POND
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [4J
Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc.
NORTHWEST FIRE/RESCUE STATION NO. 51 FILE NAME:NWFS5l
FILE LOCATION: J:\00083\0008310100\DOC\CALC\ICPR\PROPREV
INPUT REPORTS 25YR-24HR STORM
********** Input Report ********************************************************
--------C1ass: Pipe-------------------__________________________________________
Name: P-3 From Node: NODE3 Length(ft) : 36
Group: BASE To Node: NODE2 Count: 1
UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Equation: Average K
Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both
Span(in) : 24 24 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.5
Rise (in) : 24 24 Exit Loss Coef: 1
Invert (ft) : 17 16.7 Bend Loss Coef: 0
Manningls N: 0.013 0.013 Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use dc or tw
Top Clip (in) : 0 0 Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn
Bottom Clip(in) : 0 0 Stabilizer Option: None
Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description:
Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall
1
Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description:
Circular CMP: Mitered to slope
2
PIPE FROM INLET NODE 3 TO POND NODE 2
--------Class: Pipe-----------------------______________________________________
Name: P-4 From Node: NODE3 Length (ft) 112
Group: BASE To Node: NODE4 Count: 1
UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Equation: Average K
Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both
Span(in) : 24 24 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.5
Rise(in) : 24 24 Exit Loss Coef: 1
Invert (ft) : 17 16.7 Bend Loss Coef: 0
Manning's N: 0.013 0.013 Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use dc or tw
Top Clip (in) : 0 0 Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn
Bottom Clip(in) : 0 0 Stabilizer Option: None
Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description:
Circular CMP: Mitered to slope
Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description:
Circular Concrete: Square edge wi headwall
1
PIPE FROM POND NODE 4 TO INLET NODE 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21) [5J
Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc.
NORTHWEST FIRE/RESCUE STATION NO. 51 FILE NAME:NWFS51
FILE LOCATION: J:\00083\0008310100\DOC\CALC\ICPR\PROPREV
INPUT REPORTS 25YR-24HR STORM
********** Input Report ********************************************************
--------Class: Drop
Name: D-2
Group: BASE
Structure--------------------_______________________________
From Node: NODE1 Length(ft): 45
To Node: BNDY Count: 1
Outlet Cntrl Spec: Use dc or tw
Upstream Geometry: Circular
UPSTREAM
Inlet Cntrl Spec: Use dn
Downstream Geometry: Circular
DOWNSTREAM
Span (in): 15
Rise(in): 15
Invert (ft) : 17.3
Manning's N: 0.012
Top Clip (in): 0
Bottom Clip(in): 0
15
15
17
0.012
o
o
Entrance Loss Coef: 0.5
Exit Loss Coef: 1
Flow: Both
Equation: Aver Conveyance
Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description:
Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall
Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description:
Circular CMP: Mitered to slope
1
1
2
2
FROM NORTHWEST POND NODE 1 DROP STRUCTURE TO OUT
... Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure D-2 ... [TABLE]
Count: 1 Bottom Clip (in) : 0
Type: Mavis Top Clip (in) : 0
Flow: Both Weir Discharge Coef: 3.3
Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.6
Span (in) : 172
Rise(in): 6
Invert (ft) : 20.4
Control Elev(ft): 20.4
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21)
Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc.
Northwest Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
File Location: J:\00083\00083101.00\DOC\CALCS\ICPR
\PROPREV\ FILE NAME:NWFS51 25YR-24HR
Basin Name
********** Basin Results Summary - NWFSSl ******************
Time Max
(hrs)
Flow Max
(cfs)
Runoff Volume
(in)
------------------------------------------------------------
Runoff Volume
(cf)
BASIN1
BASIN2
BASIN4
EXISTING
12.04
12.04
12.04
12.04
2.62
1. 27
3.80
8.54
7.51
6.78
6.80
8.57
14167
6650
19992
49443
[lJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21)
Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc.
[lJ
Northwest Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
File Location: J:\00083\00083101.00\DOC\CALCS\ICPR
\PROPREV\ FILE NAME:NWFS51 25YR-24HR
********** Basin Summary - NWFS51 **********************************************
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basin Name: BASIN1 BASIN2 BASIN4 EXISTING
Group Name: BASE BASE BASE BASE
Node Name: NODE1 NODE2 NODE4 EXISTING
Hydrograph Type: UH UH UH UH
Unit Hydrograph: UH256 UH256 UH256 UH256
Peaking Factor: 256.00 256.00 256.00 256.00
Spec Time Inc (min) : 1. 33 1. 33 1. 33 1. 33
Comp Time Inc (min) : 1.33 1. 33 1. 33 1. 33
Rainfall File: FLMOD FLMOD FLMOD FLMOD
Rainfall Amount (in) : 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Storm Duration (hr) : 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00
Status: ONSITE ONSITE ONSITE ONSITE
Time of Conc. (min) : 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Lag Time (hr) : 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Area (acres) : 0.52 0.27 0.81 1. 59
Vol of Unit Hyd (in) : 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
Curve Number: 87.67 81.78 81.90 96 .42
DCIA (%) : 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Time Max (hrs) : 12.04 12.04 12.04 12.04
Flow Max (cfs) : 2.62 1. 27 3.80 8.54
Runoff Volume (in) : 7.51 6.78 6.80 8.57
Runoff Volume (cf) : 14167 6650 19992 49443
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21)
Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc.
[ 1J
Northwest Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
File Location: J:\000B3\000B3101.00\DOC\CALCS\ICPR
\PROPREV\ FILE NAME:NWFS51 25YR-24HR
********** Node Maximum Conditions - NWFS51 ********************************************************************************
(Time units - hours)
Node Group Max Time
Name Name Conditions
Warning
Stage (ft)
Max Stage
(ft)
Max Delta
Stage (ft)
Max Surface
Area (sf)
Max Time
Inflow
Max Inflow
(cfs)
Max Time
Outflow
Max Outflow
(cfs)
BNDY BASE 24.00 19.00 19.00 0.0001 0.00 12.15 6.02 0.00 0.00
NODE1 BASE 12.15 20.65 21.50 -0.0023 3065.23 12.13 6.04 12.15 6.02
NODE2 BASE 12.22 20.73 21.50 -0.0049 952.99 12.24 3.92 12.26 3.93
NODE3 BASE 12.23 20.76 22.00 -0.0043 4363.40 0.00 0.00 2.54 1. 46
NODE4 BASE 12.22 20.80 21.50 -0.0048 5078.67 12.00 1. OB 0.00 0.00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2.21)
Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc.
[1]
Northwest Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
File Location, J,\00083\00083101.00\DOC\CALCS\ICPR
\PROPREV\ FILE NAME,NWFS51 25YR-24HR
********** Link Maximum Conditions - NWFS51 **************************************************************
(Time uni ts
Link
Name
- hours)
Group Max
Name
Time
Flow
Max Flow
(ds)
Max Delta Q
(cfs)
Max Time
U/S Stage
Max Time
D/S Stage
Max US Stage
1ft)
Max DS Stage
(ft)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D-2 BASE 12.15 6.02 -0.07 12.15 20.65 24.00 19.00
P-l BASE 12.26 3.93 1. 07 12.22 20.73 12.15 20.65
P-3 BASE 12.32 3.01 1. 74 12.23 20.76 12.22 20.73
P-4 BASE 2.54 0.29 -0.42 12.23 20.76 12.22 20.80
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachments
,
I
~.
I
I
-
-
-
-
~
_.
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER ..MA...N'AGEMENT DISTRICT
"'f' ~ '- I
Lr-------r-; "-J '--- I /___~
I I J \ I /- ,
J {I 1..u - J
I , I
l I I ^
I r--~
I
_j--"--1-L \
\
I) __-~
~ L-__
''l.
I -,
I \
~ ;.,
____i ~
)
~
I '--
t---1
I r/
~ L_I._
rrENTY'FOU~ HOUR
TlTENTY FIVE YEAR
RETURN PERIOD
I
I
I
+--~--...-
AAI NF ALL MAP
\
\
\- ""?
"':::I
"-
't
I.....
N
10
SCAlE
o
10
20 30
LEGEND
~ RAINFALL CONTOUR IN INCHES.
..--10 .
J BOUNDA~Y OF THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
I WA TER MANAGEtwENT D I STR I CT
r
____I
- - COUNTY BOUNDARY
FIGURE D-5
Table 2-2a..-Runoff curve numbers for urban areas1
Cover description
Cover type and hydrologic condition
Fully developed urban areas (vegetation established)
Open space Qawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries,
. etc.)3:
Poor condition (grass cover < 50%) ..............
Fair condition (grass cover 50% to 75%). ,. ........
Good condition (grass cover > 75%) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impervious areas:
Paved parking lots. roofs, driveways, etc,
(excluding right-of.way). '" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Streets and roads:
Paved; curbs and storm sewers (excluding
right-of.way) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paved; open ditches (including right-of-way) . . . . . . .
Gravel (including right-of.way) ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dirt (including right.or.way) ....... . .. . . . .. . . . . . .
Western desert urban areas:
Natural desert landscaping (pervious areas only"...
Artificial desert landscaping (impervious weed
barrier, desert shrub with 1. to 2.inch sand
or gravel mulch and basin borders). ..............
Urban districts: .
Commercial and business. ... .. .. . . . . .. . ... : . . . . .. .
Industrial. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential districts by average lot size:
1/8 acre or less (town houses) . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . .
1/4 acre .........................................
1/3 acre ..........................................
I/2..acre .........................................
1 acre.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 acres . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Develcping urban areas
Newly graded areas (pervious areas only,
no vegetation)5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Idle lands (CN's are determined using cover types
similar to those in table 2.2c).
Curve numbers for
hYdrologic..soil group-
Average percent
impervious area2
A
C
B
D
68 79 86 89
49 69 79 84
39 61 74 80
98 98 98 98
98 98 98 98
83 89 92 93
76 85 89 91
72 82 87 89
63 77 85 88.
96 96 96 96
85 89 92 94 95
72 81 88 91 93
65 77 85 90 92
38 61 75 83 87
30 57 72 81 86
25 54 70 80 85
20 51 68 79 84
12 46 65 77 82
77
86
91
94
IAverage runoff condition, and 1. = 0.28. .
2'J'he aver.1ge percent impervious area shO\\ll was used to develop the composite CN's. Other assumptions are as follows: impervious areas
are direl:tly connected lothe dr.una~e system, impervious areas have a CN of 98, and pervious areas are considered equivalent lo open
... space in good h,vdrologic condition. eN's for other combinations of conditions may be computed using figure 2-3 or 2-4.
:l(;N'::; shown are equh'alent to those of pasture. Composite eN's may be computed for other combinations of open space cover type.
; "Composite CN's for natul"dl desert landsC'dping should be computed using figures 2-3 or 2-4 ba.sed on the impervious area percentage (CN
,= 98) and the pervious area CN. The pervious area CN's are assumed equivalenl to desert shMlb in poor hydrologic condition.
.-Composite CN's to use for the design of lempol"J.ry measures during gT'oldirig and construction should be comput.erl usin~ figure 2-3 or 2-4,
based on lhe degree of development (imperyioU5 area percentage) and the CN's for the newly grdded pervious areas.
(210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986)
2.5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OQ::&~...~.oo i
T IERRA
January 13, 2003
TBE Group, Inc.
380 Park Place Boulevard, Suite 300
Clearwater, Florida 33759
Attn: Mr. Brian Zarlenga, P.E.
RE: Geotechnical Engineering Services Report
Proposed Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Overbrook and Betty Lane
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No.: 6511.02.199
Ms. Zarlenga:
Per your authorization, Tierra, Inc. has completed the geotechnical engineering study for
the referenced project. The results of the study are provided herein.
Should there by any questions regarding the report, please do not hesitate to contact our
office at (813) 989-1354. Tierra would be pleased to continue providing geotechnical
services throughout the implementation of the project, and we look forward to working with
you and your organization on this and future projects.
Respectfully Submitted,
TIERRA, IN~ f.. .
(}[/2;J) '-/
Environmental Scientist
H nri ;;e-d~0
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
FL Registration No. 55420
7805 Professional Place. Tampa, FL 33637
Phone (813) 989-1354. Fax (813) 989-1355
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page 1 of 1
PROJ E CT DESCRIPTION ...... ...... ...... ............. ....... ........ ..................... ................. ........ 1
Project Information..................................................................................................... 1
Scope of Services......... ............... ...... .... ..... ....... ..................... ............ ............ .... ....... 1
SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3
General Site Information ....... ........... ... ...................... ........ ................. ............... .......... 3
Subsurface Conditions....... ...... ............. ........ ........... ..... .................. .... ............... ........ 3
Pinellas County Soil Survey............. ...... ................. ..... .... ................. .................... ..... 4
Groundwater Information. ............ ....... ... ....... ..... ..... ...... .................... ............... .......... 4
Double Ring Infiltration Test............................................................. ......................... 4
LABORATORY TESTI NG................... ......................... ........ .............. ............ ............... 5
General.. .. '" ........ .. . . .... .. . . . ....... '" . . .. .. . . . ... ... .. ..... . .. .. .. . ............... '" . .. . . . . ...... ...... .. . .. ..... ... 5
Soil Classification....................................................................................................... 5
Organ ic Co ntent.. .. .. ... . .. ... .. . .. '" .. .. .. .. .. . .. . ... .... ..... ..... . . . . .......... .. ... . .. . . .. .. .. ..... . .. .. .. . ... ..... 5
Moisture Content............. ................... ...... .... .......... ......................... ...... .............. ...... 5
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................ 6
Gene ra I ..... ....... . .. .. . . . . . ... .......... ... . ..... . ..... .... .. . .. . . . .. . .. . .. ... .......... '" . . . ... . .. .. ...... .. .. . ..... ..... 6
Site Preparation.......... ........ ............. ....... ................ ............................ ........ ............... 6
Foundation Recommendations.................................................................................. 7
Settlement.................................................................................................................. 7
Floor Slab and Interior Parking Bay Drive.................................................................. 8
Pavement Recommendations..... ........ ...... ......... ........ ....................... ............ .... ...... ... 8
CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................ 9
General...................................................................................................................... 9
Fill Placement and Subgrade Preparation ............................................................... 10
Drainage and Groundwater Concerns ..................................................................... 11
Structural Fill............................................................................................................ 12
Excavations ... ..... .... ... ... ............... ......... .... .... ..... ..... ......................... ..... ........... ........ 12
REPORT LIMITATIONS. ....... ............... ........ ................. .................... .......... .......... ...... 13
APPENDIX
Boring Location Plan
Soil Profiles
Summary of Laboratory Results
Sheet 1
Sheet 2
Table 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No. 6511-02-199
Page 1 of 13
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Information
The project is located south of Overbrook Drive and east of in Douglas Avenue in
Clearwater, Florida.
The project, as we understand it, consists of developing a new single story, fire/rescue
structure. Parking facilities and a retention pond will support the proposed development.
The site, as Tierra understand it, was a previous low lying area which was backfilled with
random fill and construction debris. In addition, site development is anticipated to include
stripping up to 3 feet of the existing site.
Scope of Services
The objective of our study was to obtain information concerning subsurface conditions at
the site in order to obtain data from which to base engineering estimates and
recommendations in each of the following areas:
1 . Feasibility of utilizing the anticipated shallow spread foundation system for
support of the structure. Suitability of a slab-on-grade.
2. Design parameters required for the foundation system, including allowable
bearing pressures, foundation sizes, foundation levels and soil subgrade
treatments. Estimation of soil modulus of subgrade reaction for in-situ soils
encountered in the area of the proposed fire truck parking bay.
3. Suitability of materials on-site for use as structural fill, pavement subgrade fill
and general backfill. Recommendations for placement and compaction of
approved fill materials.
4. Engineering criteria for placement and compaction of approved fill materials.
5. General location and description of potentially deleterious materials
discovered in the borings which may interfere with construction progress,
pavement and structure performance, including existing fills or surficial
organics.
6. Identification of groundwater levels and pavement subgrade conditions.
7. General pavement section recommendations and construction
considerations.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No. 6511-02-199
Page 2 of 13
8. Estimation of seasonal high groundwater levels and shallow soil infiltration
characteristics.
In order to meet the proceeding objectives, we provided the following services.
1. Reviewed readily available published soils and topographic information. This
published information was obtained from the appropriate Florida Quadrangle
Map published by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the Soil
Survey of Pinellas County, Florida published by the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS).
2. Executed a program of subsurface exploration consisting of borings, subsurface
sampling and field-testing. We performed three (3) Standard Penetration Test
(SPT) borings in the structure area to a depth of 25 feet below existing site
grades. In each boring, samples were collected and SPT resistances measured
virtually continuously for the top 10 feet and on intervals of 5 feet thereafter. We
also performed four (4) hand auger borings in the parking areas to an
approximate depth of 5 feet below the existing ground surface.
3. A Double Ring Infiltration Test (DRIT) will be completed within the proposed
retention area. In addition, we plan to perform one (1) power auger boring in the
proposed retention area to an approximate depth of 15 feet below the existing
ground surface or until seasonal high groundwater levels are determined.
4. Visually classified the samples in the laboratory using the Unified Soil
Classification System (USCS). Conducted a limited laboratory-testing program.
Identified soil conditions at each boring location and formed an opinion of the
site soil stratigraphy.
5. Collected groundwater level measurements and estimated normal wet seasonal
high water tables.
6. Prepared a formal engineering report in accordance with the request for
proposal (RFP) provided by TBE Group which summarizes the course of study
pursued, the field and laboratory data generated, subsurface conditions
encountered and our engineering recommendations in each of the pertinent
topic areas.
The scope of our services did not include an environmental assessment for determining the
presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, bedrock,
groundwater, or air, on or below or around this site. Any statements in this report or on the
boring logs regarding odors, colors, unusual or suspicious items or conditions are strictly
for the information of our client.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No. 6511-02-199
Page 3 of 13
SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
General Site Information
The project is located south of Overbrook Drive and east of in Douglas Avenue in
Clearwater, Florida.
Based on the Clearwater, Florida, United States Geological Survey (USGS), topographic
map, the ground surface elevation at the property is approximately +19 to +20 feet National
Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) across the site.
Subsurface Conditions
The subsurface conditions were explored using three (3) Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
borings in the structure area to a depth of 25 feet below existing site grades. In addition,
four (4) auger borings were performed to a depth of five (5) feet within the proposed
parking areas. The borings were located in the field by an engineering technician
measuring distances from existing site features. The approximate boring locations are
presented in the Appendix.
The SPT borings and power auger boring were performed with the use of a track-mounted
drill rig using Bentonite Mud drilling procedures. The soil sampling was performed in
general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) test
designation D-1586 titled Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils. SPT
resistance N-values were taken continuously in the initial 1 0 feet and at intervals of 5 feet
thereafter. The soil samples were classified in the field and transported to our laboratory
for review.
The soil strata encountered in the borings performed at the proposed development are
summarized in the following table:
1 Brown Fine SAND to Slightly Siltly Fine SP, SP-SM
SAND
2 Muck Pt
3 Blue-Green Sandy CLAY CL
4 Blue-Green CLAY to Indurated CLAY CH
5 Brown to Blue-Green Clayey SAND SC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No. 6511-02-199
Page 4 of 13
The subsurface soil stratification is of a generalized nature to highlight the major
subsurface stratification features and material characteristics. The soil profiles included in
the Appendix should be reviewed for specific information at individual boring locations.
These profiles include soil description, stratifications and penetration resistances. The
stratifications shown on the boring profiles represent the conditions only at the actual
boring location. Variations may occur and should be expected between boring locations.
The stratifications represent the approximate boundary between subsurface materials and
the actual transition may be gradual.
Pinellas County Soil Survey
The Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida published by the USDA, SCS was reviewed for
general near surface soil information. This information indicates there is one (1) primary
mapping unit at the project location.
Unit Ma - Made Land - This soil unit consists of "mixed sand, clay, hard rock,
shells, and shell fragments that have been transported, reworked, and leveled by
earth-moving equipment."
Groundwater Information
The groundwater levels were measured at depths of approximately two (2) to three (3) feet
below existing grade. It should be noted that groundwater levels tend to fluctuate during
periods of prolonged drought and extended rainfall and may be affected by man-made
influences. In addition, a seasonal effect will also occur in which higher groundwater levels
are normally recorded in rainy seasons. ltis estimated that the seasonal high groundwater
table (SHGWT) will be encountered at a depth of approximately 1 foot below existing
grade.
Double Ring Infiltration Test
The DRIT was completed at a depth of 1 % feet below the existing site grade for the
proposed pond. The groundwater table was encountered at approximately 3 feet below
existing grade. Based on the results of the DRI test, the infiltration rate is estimated to be
10 ftlday. The DRIT location was moved approximately 135 feet south and performed
within an area which appeared to consist of more natural soil due to the construction debris
encountered within the proposed pond area. This location is included in the Appendix.
Given that the site will be over excavated and backfilled with clean sands, infiltration rates
similar to the natural soil rate observed should be suitable for site development.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No. 6511-02-199
Page 5 of 13
LABORATORY TESTING
General
Representative soil samples collected from the borings were classified and stratified in
general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Our classification was
based on visual inspection, using the results from the laboratory testing as confirmation.
Laboratory tests were assigned to aid in classification of the explored soils. These tests
included organic content and natural moisture content.
Soil Classification
The auger boring soil samples were classified using the Unified Soil Classification System
in general accordance with the ASTM test designation 0-2487. This test method classifies
soils into specific categories based on the results of the laboratory testing program. The
assignment of a group name and symbol is then used to aid in the evaluation of the
significant engineering properties of a soil.
Organic Content
Moisture free samples are used for this test. Drying is accomplished by heating the
samples in a warm (2300 F) oven. The dried soil samples are then heated in a muffle
furnace at a temperature of 8330 F for six hours, thereby burning off all organic-type
material, leaving only the soil minerals. The difference in weight prior to and after the
burning is the weight of the organics. The weight of the organics divided by the weight of
the dried soil before the burning process is the percentage of organics within the sample.
Organic contents that exceed five (5) percent are considered detrimental by FOOT criteria.
Tests were performed in general accordance with AASHTO T-267.
Moisture Content
The laboratory moisture content test consists of the determination of the percentage of
moisture contents in selected samples in general accordance with AASHTO test
designation T-265 (ASTM test designation 0-2216). Briefly, natural moisture content is
determined by weighing a sample of the selected material and then drying it in an oven.
Care is taken to use a temperature of 2300 F and does not destroy any organics. The
sample is removed from the oven and reweighed. The difference of the two weights is the
amount of moisture removed from the sample. The weight of the moisture divided by the
weight of the dry soil sample is the percentage by weight of the moisture in the sample.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No. 6511-02-199
Page 6 of 13
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
The results of the field exploration program indicate approximately 2 to 3 feet of random fill
and construction debris across the site. An organic laden material "muck", was
encountered in borings AB-2 and AB-3 between the depths of 1 to 3 feet below existing
grade. Organic contents ranged from 11 to 17 percent by weight. Allowable percentages
are less than 5 percent. Based on the subsurface material encountered, Tierra
recommends over excavating 2 to 3 feet of the existing site and replacing the material as
needed with clean engineered fill. The excavation process should be observed by a
qualified geotechnical engineer or representative during the removal and replacement of
the site fill.
In addition, isolated areas of deeper debris or material deemed detrimental should be
expected during site development. The area should be over excavated to the suitability of
the site inspector and backfilled with engineered fill in accordance with this report.
Dewatering of the site may be necessary to facilitate proper placement and compaction the
engineered fill. As a minimum, groundwater will need to be lowered to a depth of 18 inches
below bottom of excavation. Following completion of the over excavating process and
backfilling, the site may be developed utilizing conventional shallow foundation supported
on compacted engineered fill. Our recommendations for site preparation, foundation
design criteria, settlement, floor slabs and construction considerations are presented in the
following report sections.
Site Preparation
Prior to construction, the location of any existing underground utilities within the
construction area should be established. Provisions should then be made to relocate any
interfering utility lines within the construction area to appropriate locations and backfilling
the excavation with compacted structural fill. In this regard, it should be noted that if
abandoned underground pipes are not properly removed or plugged, they might serve as
conduits for subsurface erosion, which subsequently may result in excessive settlement.
As a minimum, it is recommended that the clearing operations extend to the depth needed
to remove surface vegetation and associated root materials and other material considered
deleterious at least 15 feet beyond the proposed development area.
Fill placement and subgrade preparation recommendations are presented in the
"Construction Considerations" Section of this report.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No. 6511-02-199
Page 7 of 13
Foundation Recommendations
The borings performed in the proposed building generally encountered medium to dense
fine sand underlying the fill material and muck type soil. Following the removal of the
material, the remaining natural soil should be adequate for support of site development
following proper site preparation.
Based on our evaluation and analyses, these soils are capable of supporting the proposed
structure on shallow foundations after proper subgrade preparation, including vibratory
surface compaction.
Based on the anticipated light construction, shallow foundations should be designed for a
net maximum allowable bearing pressure not to exceed 2,500 pound per square foot (pst).
The foundation and floor slab should bear on properly placed and compacted cohesionless
(sand) structural fill. The existing near surface sandy soils should be improved by heavy
vibratory compaction after clearing operations to improve foundation support and reduce
total and differential settlement. Compaction criteria are presented underthe Construction
Considerations Section of this report.
All footings should be embedded so that the bottom of the foundations is a minimum of 18
inches below adjacent compacted grades on all sides. Strip or wall footings should be a
minimum of 18 inches wide and pad or column footings should be a minimum of 30 inches
wide.
The minimum footing sizes should be used regardless of whether or not the foundation
loads and allowable bearing pressures dictate a smaller size. These minimum footing
sizes tend to provide adequate bearing area to develop bearing capacity and account for
minor variations in the bearing materials. All footings should be constructed in a dry
fashion. All footing excavations should be covered during rain events. Uncovered
excavations may become oversaturated and difficult to compact during rain events.
Surface run-off water should be drained away from the excavations and not allowed to
pond. It is important that the structural elements be centered on the footings such that the
load is transferred evenly unless the footings are proportioned for eccentric loads.
Settlement
After the removal of the suspect soil and replacing the material with clean engineered fill,
the settlement of shallow foundations supported on the compacted sand fill and natural
sandy soils should occur rapidly after loading. Thus, the expected settlement should occur
during construction as dead loads are imposed. Provided the recommended site
preparation operations are properly performed and the recommendations previously stated
are utilized, the total settlement of wall and isolated column footings should not exceed
approximately % inch. Differential settlement is estimated to be on the order of % of the
total settlement. Differential settlement of this magnitude is usually considered tolerable for
the anticipated construction; however, the tolerance of the proposed structure to the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No. 6511-02-199
Page 8 of 13
predicted total and differential settlement should be confirmed by the structural engineer.
Floor Slab and Interior Parking Bay Drive
The floor slab may be safely supported as a slab-on-grade provided any undesirable
materials are removed and replaced with controlled structural fill. It is also recommended
that the floor slab bearing soils be covered by a lapped polyethylene sheeting in order to
minimize the potential for floor dampness which can affect the performance of glued tile
and carpet (if any are used). This membrane should consist of a minimum six (6) mil single
layer of non-corroding, non-deteriorating sheeting material placed to minimize seams and
to cover all of the soil below the building floor. This membrane should be cut in a cross
shape for pipes or other penetrations; the membrane should extend to within one-half inch
of all pipes or other penetrations. All seams of the membrane should be lapped at least 12
inches. Punctures or tears in the membrane should be repaired with the same or
compatible material. Based on the results ofthe field exploration program, subsequent site
development recommendations and experience with similar projects, Tierra recommends a
modulus of subgrade reaction of 290 pounds per cubic inch (pci).
Pavement Recommendations
In general, following the completion of the recommended clearing and grading operations
and fill placement, the compacted fill and natural shallow sandy soils should be acceptable
for construction and support of a flexible (Iimerock, crushed concrete, or shell base) or
semi-flexible (soil cement base) type pavement section. Any fill utilized to elevate the
cleared pavement areas to subgrade elevation should consist of reasonably clean
(maximum 12% passing #200 sieve sizes) fine sands uniformly compacted to a minimum
density of 98% of the modified Proctor maximum dry density.
The choice of pavement base type will depend on final pavement grades. If a minimum
separation of 18 inches between the bottom of the base and the seasonal high
groundwater level is obtained, then a limerock, shell, or crushed concrete base can be
utilized. A soil cement base should be utilized if the separation between final grade and
the seasonal high groundwater is a minimum of 12 inches and less than 18 inches. Base
material elevations should not be designed for saturated conditions. If the designer
wishes to have base material closer then 12 inches to the SHGWT, then an under
drain system should be utilized that will maintain the 12 inches of separation.
Limerock and shell base material should meet Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT) requirements including compaction to a minimum density of 98% of the modified
Proctor maximum dry density and a minimum Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) of 100%.
Crushed concrete should have an LBR value of 100% and be graded in accordance with
FDOT Standard Specification Section 204. Due to the expected subgrade soil conditions,
we recommend Type B stabilized subgrade (LBR = 40%) as specified by the FDOT
Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. A soil cement base should be
designed according to FDOT or PCA modified short cut design procedures. A strength of
300 psi should be achieved on laboratory cured compressive strength specimens molded
from samples taken from the base material as it is placed. A stabilized subgrade need not
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No. 6511-02-199
Page 9 of 13
be incorporated with a soil cement base.
As a guideline for pavement design, we recommend that the base course be a minimum of
6 inches thick in parking areas and 8 inches thick in heavily traveled drives. The subgrade
should be compacted to a minimum depth of 12 inches to a minimum density of 98% of the
modified Proctor maximum dry density, and should be firm and true to line and grade prior
to paving. Traffic should not be allowed on the subgrade as the base is placed to avoid
rutting. Before paving, the base should be checked for soundness.
The asphaltic concrete structural course should consist of at least one and one-half (1~)
inches of Type S asphaltic concrete material. The asphaltic concrete should meet
standard FDOT material requirements and placement procedures as outlined in the current
FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. The asphaltic concrete
should be compacted to a minimum of 96% of the Marshall maximum laboratory unit
weight.
As an alternate to the above referenced flexible pavement design, a rigid (concrete)
pavement design could be used. The concrete should have a minimum compressive
strength of 4,000 psi at 28 days when tested in accordance with ASTM C-39. Based on
our experience, a minimal thickness of five (5) inches should be utilized for standard duty
applications and a minimal thickness of six (6) inches should be utilized for heavy-duty
applications. The steel reinforcement within the concrete pavement should be designed by
the project civil engineer. The subgrade should be prepared to achieve a minimum LBR of
20% as mixed and pulverized to a depth of 12 inches below the pavement base elevation.
The subgrade soils should be compacted to a minimum density of 98% of the modified
Proctor maximum dry density.
Actual pavement section thickness should be provided by the design civil engineer based
on traffic loads. volume. and the owners design life requirements. The above sections
represent minimum thicknesses representative of typical load and construction practices
and as such periodic maintenance should be anticipated. All pavement materials and
construction procedures should conform to the FDOT or appropriate city or county
requirements.
CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
General
It is recommended that a qualified and certified material engineering firm be retained to
provide observation and testing of construction activities involved in the foundation
earthwork, and related activities of this project. Tierra cannot accept any responsibility for
any conditions, which deviate from those, described in this report, if not engaged to provide
construction observation and testing for this project.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No. 6511-02-199
Page 10 of 13
Fill Placement and Subgrade Preparation
The following are our recommendations for overall site preparation and mechanical
densification work for the construction of the proposed development based on the
anticipated construction and our boring results. These recommendations should be used
as a guideline for the project general specifications prepared by the design engineer.
The site should be cleared; this primarily includes removing any deleterious materials
encountered. It is recommended that any undesirable material be removed to the
satisfaction of Tierra prior to beginning construction at the site. Any cavities formed should
be replaced with compacted structural fill. The site should be root raked as previously
described. As a minimum, it is recommended that the clearing operations extend at least
fifteen (15) feet beyond the development perimeters. Following the clearing operations,
the exposed existing subgrade should be evaluated and proofrolled as directed by
representatives of Tierra to confirm that all unsuitable materials have been removed. The
proofrolling should consist of compaction with a large diameter, heavy vibratory drum roller.
The vibratory drum roller should have a static drum weight on the order of eight (8) to ten
(10) tons and should be capable of exerting a minimum impact force of 36,000 pounds
(DYNAPAC CA-250 or equivalent is expected to provide acceptable results). The vibratory
roller should not be used within 50 feet of any existing structures. These areas should be
compacted using a fully loaded 2 cubic yard capacity front-end loader or equivalent.
Careful observations should be made during proofrolling to help identify any areas of soft
yielding soils that may require overexcavation and replacement. Prior to any field
operations, we recommend that a survey be performed (including pictures and/or video) of
the existing structures (including utilities) located adjacent to the proposed construction.
Documentation should be made of any foundation problems or cracking noted by the
owners and the survey crews. It is also recommended that a follow-up photographic
survey be performed after the construction activities.
The proofrolling equipment should make a minimum of eight (8) overlapping passes over
the structure and pavement areas with the successive passes aligned perpendicular. It is
recommended that within the building area, the natural ground, to a minimum depth of one
(1) foot below stripped grade, be compacted to a dry density of at least 95% of the
modified Proctor maximum dry density.
Following satisfactory completion of the initial compaction, the structure and pavement
areas may be brought up to finished subgrade levels, if needed, using structural fill.
Imported fill should consist offine sand with less than 12% passing the No. 200 sieve, free
of rubble, organics, clay, debris and other unsuitable material. Fill should be tested and
approved prior to acquisition. Approved sand fill should be placed in loose lifts not
exceeding 12 inches in thickness and should be compacted to a minimum density of 95%
of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. Density tests to confirm compaction should
be performed in each fill lift before the next lift is placed.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No. 6511-02-199
Page 11 of 13
Priorto beginning compaction, soil moisture contents may need to be controlled in orderto
facilitate proper compaction. If additional moisture is necessary to achieve compaction
objectives, then water should be applied in such a way that it will not cause erosion or
removal of the subgrade soils. A moisture content within the percentage range needed to
achieve compaction is recommended prior to compaction of the natural ground and fill.
After compaction and proofrolling, the building foundation excavations can begin. All
foundation excavations should be observed by the geotechnical engineer or a
representative to explore the extent of any loose, soft, or otherwise undesirable materials.
If the foundation excavations appear suitable as load bearing materials, the bottom of the
foundation excavations should be compacted to a minimum density of 95% of the modified
Proctor maximum dry density for a minimum depth of one (1) foot below the bottom of the
footing depth, as determined by field density compaction tests.
Backfill soils placed adjacent to footings orwalls should be carefully compacted with a light
rubber-tired roller or vibratory plate compactor to avoid damaging the footings or walls.
Approved sand fills to provide foundation embedment constraint should be placed in loose
lifts not exceeding 6 inches and should be compacted to a minimum density of 95% of the
modified Proctor maximum dry density.
If soft pockets are encountered in the footing excavations, the unsuitable materials should
be removed and the proposed footing elevation may be re-established by backfilling after
the undesirable material has been removed. This backfilling may be done with a very lean
concrete or with a well-compacted, suitable fill such as clean sand, gravel, or crushed
FDOT No. 57 or FOOT No. 67 stone. Sand backfill should be compacted to a minimum
density of 95% of the modified Proctor maximum dry density.
Immediately prior to reinforcing steel placement, it is suggested that the bearing surfaces of
all footing and floor slab areas be compacted using hand operated mechanical tampers. In
this manner, any localized areas, which have been loosened by excavation operations,
should be adequately recompacted.
A representative from our firm should be retained to provide on-site observation of
earthwork and ground modification activities. Density tests should be performed in the top
one (1) foot of compacted existing ground, each fill lift, and the bottom of foundation
excavations. It is important that Tierra be retained to observe that the subsurface
conditions are as we have discussed herein, and that foundation construction ground
modification and fill placement is in accordance with our recommendations.
Drainage and Groundwater Concerns
The groundwater levels presented in this report are the levels that were measured at the
time of our field activities. Fluctuation should be anticipated. We recommend that the
Contractor determine the actual groundwater levels at the time of the construction to
determine groundwater impact on this construction procedure. Groundwater control will be
necessary for the construction of the proposed structure. Groundwater can normally be
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No. 6511-02-199
Page 12 of 13
controlled in shallow excavations or rim ditches with a sump pump. During subgrade soil
preparation, any soils below design grade could become disturbed by construction
activities. If this becomes the case, the contractor may be directed by the owner's
representative to remove the disturbed or pumping soils to a depth of 12 to 18 inches
below design grade and backfill the area with structural fill.
Water should not be allowed to collect in the foundation excavation, on the floor slab areas,
or on prepared subgrades of the construction either during or after construction. Undercut
or excavated areas should be sloped toward one corner to facilitate removal of any
collected rainwater, groundwater, or surface runoff. Positive site drainage should be
provided to reduce infiltration of surface water around the perimeter of the building and
beneath the floor slabs. The grades should be sloped away from the building and surface
drainage should be collected and discharged such that water is not permitted to infiltrate
the backfill and floor slab areas of the building.
Structural Fill
All materials to be used for structural fill or backfill should be evaluated and, if necessary,
tested by Tierra prior to placement to determine if they are suitable for the intended use.
Suitable fill materials should consist of fine to medium sand with less than 12% passing the
No. 200 sieve, free of rubble, organics, clay, debris and other unsuitable material.
Excavations
Site excavations for foundations and utilities will encounter groundwater. Stratum 1 may
be used as structural fill.
The clayey soil comprising Strata 3, 4, and 5 should not be used as backfill material due to
the difficulty in obtaining compaction.
The organic soils (Stratum 2) should be excavated from below the proposed pavement and
structure areas with clean fine compacted sand in accordance with FOOT Standard
Indexes 500 and 505.
In Federal Register, Volume 54, No. 209 (October 1989), the United States Department of
Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) amended its "Construction
Standards for Excavations, 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P". This document was issued to
better insure the safety of workmen entering trenches or excavations. It is mandated by
this federal regulation that excavations, whether they be utility trenches, basement
excavations or footing excavations, be constructed in strictly enforced and if they are not
closely followed, the owner and the contractor accordance with the new OSHA guidelines.
It is our understanding that these regulations are being could be liable for substantial
penalties.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clearwater Fire/Rescue Station No. 51
Pinellas County, Florida
Tierra Project No. 6511-02-199
Page 13 of 13
The contractor is solely responsible for designing and constructing stable, temporary
excavations and should shore, slope, or bench the sides of the excavations as required to
maintain stability of both the excavation sides and bottom. The contractors "responsible
persons", as defined in 29 CFT Part 1926, should evaluate the soil exposed in the
excavations as part of the contractor's safety procedures. In no case should slope height,
slope inclination, or excavation depth, including utility trench excavation depth, exceed
those specified in all local, state, and federal safety regulations.
We are providing this information solely as a service to our client. Tierra does not assume
responsibility for construction site safety orthe contractor's or other party's compliance with
local, state, and federal safety or other regulations.
REPORT LIMITATIONS
The Geotechnical Engineer warrants that the findings, recommendations, specifications, or
professional advice contained herein have been made in accordance with generally
accepted professional geotechnical engineering practices in the local area. No other
warranties are implied or expressed.
The scope of the exploration was intended to evaluate shallow soil conditions. The
recommendations submitted are based on the available subsurface information obtained
by Tierra and design details furnished by TBE Group, for the proposed project. If there are
any revisions to the plans for this project or if deviations from the subsurface conditions
noted in this report are encountered during construction, Tierra should be notified
immediately to determine if changes in the foundation recommendations are required. If
Tierra is not retained to perform these functions, Tierra will not be responsible for the
impact of those conditions or the geotechnical recommendations for the project.
After the plans and specifications are more complete, the Geotechnical Engineer should be
retained and provided the opportunity to review the final design plans and specifications to
check that our engineering recommendations have been properly incorporated into the
design documents. At this time, it may be necessary to submit supplementary
recommendations. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use ofTBE Group and
it's consultant(s) for the specific application to the proposed Clearwater Fire/Rescue
Station No. 51 in Pinellas County, Florida.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX
Boring Location Plan
Soil Profiles
Summary of Laboratory Results
/
/
--I
-0
Ow
(/)0::
Ww
0...1-
~~
~O
Uu
::lz
:2w
z
o
f=
u
::l
0::0
I-w
(/)1-
Zo
8z
~~
<(ro
ww
IO
w
::)
0<1:
(./)(f)e
wwo<:
80::0
>~-l
o<:wL....
tlo:::;
-lG::!z
<1: =>
uo::o
:ZWU
If-(./)
GJ<(<1:
t:;:;:=:J
Wo::~
~<(a:
w
-.J
U
f-
W
W
I
t-1
~
~
~
~
(J'o
(J'o
'I
ru
o
.!..
Li1
\D
!l
~
M
o
Z
<1:
-,
i
::E ""
W U
<1: I
'"
W
f-
o
Z
""
u
:r
i
~
~
~
o
z
w
C)
W
---!
Cll
<
T
o
'"
"" L
"" .
CJ) q: 01
t: OO:J
1: III!.JIl <[
o
:r;'~
0.. ~ :::J 0
(.? ~ ...a: 0..
tt.- ~ __ 4.-
C 0 ~ CJ
C C Jl!Ii: C
001."'00
~ +> ~ :p
d d -ud d
UUfUU
o 0 t~1I 0
...J ...J --.J ...J
OJ QJ ~ Qj
+" ~ ...... ....
d d ..."'I!lI d
{: {: rE. E
X X ""it( X
o 0 Q 0
s.. L ~ L
a. a. .it1. a.
a.a.m.a.
<t: <I: .CC[ <t:
~@.s
z
<(
---!
0.-
z
o
I-
<(
U
o
---!
~-~...".'" ~
, u
(./)
, Z
<1:
. -l
0-- 0...
C)
Z
0::::
o
m
C\J
W I-
=:J w
'" r::: w
z () I
<l: J: CD. <[ V?
'" ~~ (/) Ul ~
~ 8 G "'~ w w li1
< >- ~ '" 8cr
G: <l: ~d 0
,., .J '" >"-"""'
u z "'~ ~Wu..
~ ." <l: <l:~
<; '" :5 ~cr:;
~ ~ <
,., .. ,., .
:p 8 0 ~ ~,., 0 c::: l-
e ,., .... .<: < """' Z
.<: >- ~ 0 ~ '" 0 <[ ::::>
SP ." 13 "'''' ~..
0 Vi '" .s "'~ ~ U cr 0
.J < < ... 00 'Z u
u ~E 0 oe~ W
Z 0 0 ~ ......."
.. ,., .. .. =tit '" ~~: I l- V?
W ." e 0... , U <[
'" < >- l:l :;:g W <(
z 0 <l: , U.. """'
C) <l: '" .J .. ;;:'" .. iii~" I- 5: """'
'" u ~ Vi~ > 0
< ;;; ~<l: .. D~ W cr W
w ~& .. < .J C .. Z
.. .. 0 Uo ~~e ~ <( 0:
--.J ",-, e .. .. e ..~..
"- l:l e ~~ --" ~ ;3'<:'<: W
<'" l:l < -".. a~ .. _u..
. -" , , . uo 0 d<o ~
~o: u .. .. 0 00 . >- ()
~ ~ ~ e "'''' ~~ ." :!~~
..~ x ;;; ;;; .. <
.<:.<: ~ ~
~ . ISSI ~ ~ ..... ~o 0 ~~]
55 <e e
::m l:l
G 8 B e 8 "- l>jJt ;z
'"
~
W
L P'l P'l I-
W U U 0
<[ I I Z
~ I I ~
DEPTH IN FEET
DEPTH IN FEET
II
!!l
o
N
i\]
1111'111111111111111111111
rnrrl
"I
<[
(L
@G
1
... .
Be
..~
'>T
I
>Q
<[
G
_ka
~
~
~
(")
I
fII
~I
~ ~ t:; ;:::
G
e 0
....~
....~
;D g ~
(")
I
>Q
<[
.
~
(f)
w
~
LL
o
0:::::
0.-
.. ..
It) It)
~
ru
I
>Q
J.
G 0 e
'<
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ru
I
>Q
<[
~
~
~
o
(f)
"I
>Q
......... .
. . ......
......... .
ZgJlG~~R:: ~ ~ ~
~
"I
>Q
<[
G
.~
~
~
II11111111111111111111
II
luuJ
II
!!l
c
N
It)
N
133..:1 NI Hld3a
133J NI Hld3U
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J!l
"5
III ...
.. ...
~g:~
:: l;l Cj>
~G.I~
i:' '7 ..,
'P.
~~d
su.z
~!11
-IcaO'
o~Q:
i:'.!! ~
E (.) ..
e i=
=
Ul
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-::..-
f! :; ii - "'"': N
:3 U; - ~ 'll:t .
-_C:.;.....CO
~~8 ~'"
u-
- c
c.. _
~gc
0(.)
J!l
"5
:J .!:!...
e' i]
of ii:-l
..
~
III
i
OJ
c
<C
..
>
..
in
0-
I- 0
::J:.I:I
Ul[
~Ul
e lii
=.1:1
iO e
.:: =
UlZ
01;
C.l:l
;: e
o =
lllZ
COlt)
cci~
~~
~raCD~
"''''CG'J.,
O~~:c
Zii:9t!!
C _...
~ t;'i;
J!::ICC>
Ul 0 ..
III (.) 0
= III Z
~~U
III .. ..
eE.5-o
III D.. ...
... D..
ii: '"
... ~
.. ..
t; t=
!
'"
III
i3
~
- ><
..!! ..
-'CI
III C
'"-
ii:
'CI_
"5"5
1:7"_
::i-l
o
o
~
C>
o
;;
o
11
o
~
C>
...
'It
~
e
e
..,
.,;
e
e
~
lXlCCl
C(C(
g
.::
C.
..
c
..
Q.
e
'"
Ul
00
<"iN
00
N~
N '"
IDID
<(<(
.
-:,-
.
Aerial Photograph
Own
er:
City of Clearwater
Case:
FLD2003-01005
Site:
1720 Overbrook Avenue
Property
Size (Acres):
1.59
PIN:
03-29-15-00000-430-0500
Atlas Page:
260B
<;
"
.
.
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to reduce the number of required
parking spaces for a governmental use (fire station) from 49 spaces
(four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to 20 spaces
(1.65 spaces per 1,000) and to increase the height of a solid PVC
fence from six feet to eight feet in height, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of
Section 2-704.C.
ANALYSIS:
The 1.59-acre site is located at the southwest comer of Overbrook A venue, Betty Lane and
Fairmont Street. The site is the subject of a recent annexation application and review (ANX2002-
11019). The City Commission is expected to approve the annexation of the site into the City with
a Commercial District designation and a Commercial General land use classification on March 6,
2003 at the final reading. The site is located along a highly developed area with a mix of single-
and multi-family residential and a variety of non-residential uses including minor and major
vehicle service, warehouse and automotive scrap yards. The subject property includes four vacant
one-story metal buildings, is generally paved and has undergone substantial deterioration. The site
has five, existing driveways along the front (north) property line (Overbrook Avenue).
The request is to reduce the number of required parking spaces for a governmental use (fire
station) from 49 spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to 20 spaces (1.65
spaces per 1,000) and to increase the height of a solid PVC fence from six feet to eight feet in
height, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-
704.C.
The proposal includes the demolition of all four existing, metal structures and constructing a fire
and rescue station (Northwest Fire and Rescue Station No. 51) that will be approximately 12,280
square feet in size and 23 feet in height. The building area dedicated to equipment and vehicle
storage and living area will be evenly split between the two. The building will house four fire
trucks and nine firefighters. The proposal includes 20 parking spaces and two driveways along
Overbrook A venue. The smallest building feasible has been designed for the site. The reductions
in setbacks are to pavement only and are required to provide adequate turning radii for fire trucks
and other emergency vehicles necessary to effectively operate the fire station. The site will
generally be staffed with nine employees at any given time and the provided number of parking
spaces will more than adequately serve the proposed use.
The building will include a brick and earth-tone stucco fa~ade, scoring and other architectural
features. The roofline will be articulated to provide additional aesthetic interest.
The landscape plan exceeds the requirements of Code utilizing a variety of colorful groundcovers
(including liriope and dune sunflower), shrubs (including Indian hawthorn, silverthorn and
viburnum), shade and ornamental trees (including live oak, magnolia and crape myrtle and Sabal
palms).
A PVC fence, eight feet in height will be located along the rear, south property line between the
subject site and the adjacent residential use properties to the south for additional buffering.
CDB Notes -'-- Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 - Page 1
.
.
"-
A monument-style, freestanding sign, 37.5 square feet in area and 5.5 feet in height, is proposed
with this development. The Minimum Development Standards of the Code permit a freestanding
sign 20 square feet in area. The sign, as submitted, will require a review by Staff as part of a
Comprehensive Sign Program. Solid waste will be removed via a screened dumpster. All
stormwater requirements have been met.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on February 13, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development application to reduce the number of required parking spaces for a governmental use
(fire station) from 49 spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to 20 spaces
(1.65 spaces per 1,000) and to increase the height of a solid PVC fence from six feet to eight feet
in height, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section
2-704.C for the site at 1720 Overbrook A venue, with the following bases and conditions.
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of approval:
1. That all Stormwater requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
2. That a Tree Preservation Plan, prepared by a Certified Arborist, which indicates how the
proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines)
and how those impacts will be mitigated, tree barricade limits and details be submitted to and
approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
4. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme
including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of
uniformity; and
5. That evidence of a County right-of-way permit for all work within right-of-way of Overbrook
A venue be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any permits
S:\Planning Department\C D B\FlexVnactive or Finished Applications\Overbrook 1720 Fire and Rescue Station NW - Approved\Overbrook 1720
CDB Notes. doc
CDB Notes - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2003-01005 - Page 2
'"'~~-
R: -~
.... :~
.'
~-,~'---...:
..'---
-f
"""'-
,J
-J' ,-' ;c
$ "
-t'l:>'
_# I
/
\ /
, ~ /
/' .:/1.
" _/ / .
... -,!
"r'-'
~.~
.
.
'';;''''G'I ,.
~:c~-~:.:~~ ~, .--~ ~.,:.
H"'''' _."...._..
-'," '.~'. ----
,.............. ..
NVld
3d't8S0NVl
;:~
..i.-.-....,_J__.,.~.__, ...
=- .~~_~.Y.._y..,J.
___"_~~, f "VCII.O';;M-__)_'.lYM_ "V~'j '.1___"_"_"_ 8__ ..-,WtY-ti-~ OIa__~-_~'~~~ r --
: 0" IN:MHiYdiiO 3n:lS3l' OHV 3"':1 t~!
- :',-1 1.. it.a..l.VM"V)'~ ~Q.~J.I:) ....;.....' ,_
--:.':'" J
LSON NOll.'tl._S
3n8S3M ONV 3MJ.:J l.S3MHl.MON
"
-' ,
'. ~.
, '
,_.-
." ~-
,
~
, .
li AU
..~
A'.~; ~
~ ~!'S
.; h:~-
".~~;~!
<~ oi
~'" I ~
! ~. ,*
,"/"
.~.l
': '"
,,;j/ .~.
(, II.'.:~ -'
j/ ;):"~>:" ~I
/1/' ::::~~~~-,~t
.j / ~~~jl
" I ~r
/ '~n-
/ ";{.-:"'!
/~')'
\:i'(i~'l1
;('\
,
!}:,I
\il
'I
,I
/
:~'.--'
, .
~
;-
"
" '
'.
>-
3~
/,
,.J/J
~>/ ,4 ~
/, ,"
,,"~" ../
:~ ,
~ ~=.=.:.~:.
;
"I:
I'!
.
Q:::
w
~
~L{)
<r:z
~O
u~
LLI--"
Ocn
~~
U~
e
e
~
.
.
.
.
I ~t
)
!
-
~~~
.. ~\.ALOF TIIl(J~
~I~
'.~ ,) 1/ I ~,
~-_- I OO;::Ci'l
'~-~~
~7f4TE~ ~~.~
~~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
March 21, 2003
Mr. Brian Zarlenga
TBE Group
380 Park Place, Suite 300
Clearwater, FL 33757
~ ~ n ri?II
I;~ ~ Ik. ~
RE: Development Order regarding Case FT n?()()~-01005 at 1720 Overbrook Avenue
Dear Mr. Zarlenga:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On March 18, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
application for Flexible Development approval to reduce the number of required parking spaces for a
governmental use (fire station) from 49 spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) to
20 spaces (1.65 spaces per 1,000) and to increase the height of a solid PVC fence from six feet to eight
feet in height, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section
2-704.C. The proposal includes a 12,280 square foot fire and rescue station. The Community
Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C. .
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment
efforts.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
( ~ i
March 21, 2003
Zarlenga - Page Two
.
e
.
Conditions of approval:
1. That all Stormwater requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
2. That a Tree Preservation Plan, prepared by a Certified Arborist, which indicates how the proposed
building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) and how those
impacts will be mitigated, tree barricade limits and details be submitted to and approved by Staff
prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
4. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme
including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of uniformity;
and
5. That evidence of a County right-of-way permit for all work within right-of-way of Overbrook
A venue be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any permits
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (March 18, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be
obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change
with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a
period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
In addition, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated by a property
owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval) within 14 days of the date of the
CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on April 1 , 2003.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 727.562.4558. Zoning
information is available through the City's website at www.clearwater-fl.com via the "Clearwater
Parcel and Zoning" link and "Community Development Code" link (via the Planning Department site).
Very truly yours,
~.~
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D B\FlexVnactive or Finished Applications\Overbrook 1720 Fire and Rescue Station NW - Approved\Overbrook 1720
DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc