FLD2003-10055
~. €learwater
o~
~
--.
d.\f~ r:, /w/4
Planning Department
100 SQu1h Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater. Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4866
J SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
,
J
SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION induding
1) coUa1ed, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets ot site plans
SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 12....()J . cJb
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
PL.,' ",.::'/\i;'(TMENT
L; i I /'Jr CLEARWATER
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive InfiD Redevelopment Project (Revised 11105/02)
....PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT..... use additioll81 mom as DCCClIlIary
A. APPLICANT. PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
Roma Square, Inc.
APPLICANT NAME:
MAIUNG ADDRESS:
516 Patricia Drive, Dunedin, FL 34698
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
727-734-2200
CELL NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
727-734-3282
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
Roma Square, Inc.
(MUI1t InctudB AU. owners)
AGENT NAME(S):
Robert Pergolizzi, AICP Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS:
13630 58th Street N, Suite 110, Clearwater, FL 33760
E-MAIL ADDRESS:pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com
PHONE NUMBER:
727-524-1818
CELL NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
727-524-6090
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS of subject site:
2001-2021 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd., & 511 S. Hercules Ave.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
See Attached Legal Descripttion
PARCEL NUMBER:
(lfn-...It...-~...._-- _1____ ___.l._.-L.. '___M.__ _1.&1.1_ .....1_.,..____...... ...._ _......__,..._..
13/29/15/57690/000/0010 and 0030/0060/0080/0090/0110
1.98 acres, 86,060 s.f.
PARCEL SIZE:
(aa'llll. SCI&'e feet)
Retail Sales, Daycare Center . ( 22 , 692 s. f . )
(number 01 dMIltlng unIls. I10IBI rooms rr square foaIage at IllIIII~dlaIlJ88)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Reduction in front, side setbacks, reduction in required parking. (AIJO .5E~ ;; nA~"~t)
(Inc:IUdB all requested c:cdedevlallcns; e.g.l8duclIan In l8qUirm l1UI1Itleraf pertdng spaces, spec:IIc use. etc.)
tllt/JIlI1TIV~ ..5;",MAA/, ~(t4"'~"*",.~ 1J,tP~'T/''''/''~ htPVffr.f)
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Develcpment Application - Comprehensive InflO Redevelopment Projed- CIty of Clearwater
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE
DEVELOPMENT. OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROv
doc....)
ER OF OEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PRE LY APPROVED PlANNED UNIT
(CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ X ~. j'eS. aUach a i:OPY of the applicable
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (SectIon 4-oa2.A)
l:I SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TInE INSURANCE POLICY. DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATIESTINO OWNERSHIP (sGe
pege 6)
D. WRlnEN SUBMrrrAL REQUIREMENTS; (SectIon U13.A)
a Plavlde complete rBSpOI1888 to the sIx (8) GENERAL APPUCABLITY CRITERIA - Explain b:sDr. eectl crlIelta Is 8dlIeYed. In Clel8l:
1. The JlI'OPD88d development of1tle land wll be In hannony wIIh ttw SCIIIe. bulk, coverage. dllll8lty and characlBr at adjacent propertle8 In
Whloh It IS located.
Gulf-to-Bay Boulavard is a commercial Highway containin~ several older strip shoppim?: centers "ith little landscaping. This
introduction of landscapinJ!: a1on~Gu1f-to-Bav will upgrade site anoearance. The site complies "ith FAR. & ISR requirements. _
2. l1KI prapollBd dsvelopment will not hinder at dlecoUrage the 8PprcpdaIII developmenl and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
tmpU the vaIUII thereof.
Adjacent buildings include commercial uses. similar to these on-site. No additional building space is proposed, the addition of
landscaped areas will improve the value and site appearance.
3. The proposed deveJopmentwll not adWlnl8ly all'ect1he IleBIIn orS8l8tyarperBDIII residing orworfdng In 1he neighborhood oftbe proposed
UIIe. Only landscaping and parking lot restriping is proposed. ACE Cash E:\.-press "ill e'q)3lld and remove the adiacent
R&W Pawn Shop "ithin ROffia Square.
... The proposed deVelopment Is de81gnecf to minimIZe tramc c:ongesdan.
No increase in develooment entitlements are t)roDOsed.
5. TIMI prcpoaec} dewloplIMJnt is consistent with U. community charadIIlr or the immediate vtdnIty or ttIe parcel proposed for development.
Gulf-to-Bay is highly commercial with strip shopping centers and lack of landscaping. The landscaping will improve the
community character and the Gulf-to-Bay corridor.
6. The daslgn of the prop08llld dlMllopmBnt II1inimR8a advenI811f11da, IncIUcIng vlsu8l. acoudc and oIfadI:lry and hoIJrs of operation Impacts,
aft adJacent propemes.
The introduction of landscapingwhere none exist will improye the aesthetics. There "ill be no change to e~st:ing hours of
operation or existing buildings. The parking lot "ill be restriped.
(] PIDWIe complete responses to U1e ten (10) COMPREHt:NShlE IliFLL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - ExpBin
.ba eadl cdBlta 1& achkMId In deml:
1. Tbe deWllopmsnt or redevelopment of the paIC8I proposed 1DI'dew..... fa oIMII__ Imprac11C81 wII10ut d8VillllDn81rom the .... inIInslty
and dsV8loDment standards.
The e'risting parking lot directly abuts both Gulf-to Bay Boulevard and Hercules Avenue \lith no landscaping. Providing
-- --- ..-------
25 feet would eliminate a complete row of parking on the north and west sides which would be impractical for the current
business.
Page 2 of 7 - FlexIble Development AppIoatlon - Compl'8hensiYe InIB RedfmllGpment Ptaject- City of C..Mater'
2. The development of the parcel pro or development as a compr&henslve infII 18dsve/f: project or realdentlallnflll projeGt wlH not
reduce the fair martcet value at abuIIIng propet1les. (Inc:kIde the exJ8Ing value of !be sllB and the plDposed value of the site wlth lbe
Improvements..) The existing market value of the site is $1.45 million per Pinellas Cmmty Property Appraiser data, the
Expected landscape improvements would increase the value minimaUyto approximately $1.5 million. The improvements
are an upgrade and would not reduce market value of abutting properties.
3. The Ull88 wItIIfn the camprahens1ve Inf111l8dev8Iopment project are otheMi8e pennlltBd In Ihe City of Clearwater.
Retail senices are pennitted in the Commercial :e, zone.
4. The uses or mIX of lIS8 within the comprehensive InftII 18c18V81opn1lant proJect are mmpatIbIB wIIh adjacent IancI uaea.
Adjacent land uses include commercial development on the east and the north side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard,
Clearwater High School to the west of Hercules Avenue and office zoning to the south. The existing uses on-site
will not be changed.
5. Suitable BIIn fOr develDpment Of J1Idevelcpment of1he ... or mix of 11888 wiId'l1he COftIIlNhenslw In1'III redevelopment projeCt 8111 not
otherWIse aYBllable in the CIty of ClearwetBr.
This site is suitable for commercial development. Gulf-to-Bay is fully developed with few vacant sites. No additional
development activity ),ill occur. The site \\ill be upgraded by adding landscaping and restriping the parkiIig lot.
6. The development of the pam proposed for dtMt/opmeIIt .. a ~ InfBI JWdeve/opment project wDI upgtade the ImIllllClIate W:lnlly of
the parcel pmposed for development. The expansion of ACE Express, Inc. \\ill remove the R& W Pawn Shop thereby
eliminating a "'problematic use". The installation ofa 7.8' to 10' landscape buffer along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard ,,,ill
upgrade the property and the immediate vicinity.
- -.,
7. The desfgn of the proposed compntll8nslV8 InfIII redewIopment project aeat8s a form and function that enbences the communttv characIBr or
the Immedlal8 Yiclnlly of1he pan:e/ propoeed for development and lie CIly of Cle8IWlIIlIr as a whale. No changes to the building
are proposed. The parking lot "ill be redesigned to add landscaping. buffers and internal islands and spaces ",ill be
restriped. This will enhance the appearance of Gulf-ta-Bay Blvd corridor as a "gateway route" for the City of Clean vater.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot WIdII\. raquIred 8IItbacb. he/gllt and otr..sll'll8t paddng anl jUBlI/IBd by 1I1e tBnefIls 10 communllV characlBr and the
Immed/at8 vtcInlty or 1M parcel prcposeclfor dewlopment and Ih8 CRy of CI8eIwaW as a whale. Strict adherence to the code would
make the parking lot modifications impractical and the "status quo" would remain. The flexibility to provide the proposed
landscaping improvements benefits the community character by beau~ing Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
9. Adequate oft'...neet parIIIng In Ih8 Immec1Ia1B vIcInIy 8CCDI'da1g t) die sh8AId J&tdng fDnnul8 In Divilion 14 of ArtIcle 3 will be available 10
avald on-s1reet parking In Ite ImmedI8te vIcInIly of parcel ptapueed far deWIopInent.
Frequent obseIVations have proved the existing parlting supply to be adequate for tenants. Strict interpretation of code would
require more spaces than can reasonably fit on this site. On-street parking is provided on Hercules Avenue.
10. The de&Ign of all buildings complies WIIh 1h8 TaurtIt DIBII/ct or DawnblWn CIetrtct ~ gu/d.....lo Division S at AItIde 3 (as applk:able ~
Use separate she_.. necrn 'Y.
Not Applicable.
Page 3 of 1 - Flexible D8l/8lopment AppIcation - Compnmensiwe InfIII Redevelopment Projd- CIty at C1lK1M8tBr
o
a SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (Including legal descriptiOn of property) - One original and 12 copies;
E. r;UPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
Cl
)(
a
o
o
TREE SURVEY (Including exlsUng trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees 10 be removed);
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
PARKING DEMAND S11JDY In conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards rle. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the
submittal of this application, the methodology of suCh study shaD be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted trafflc engineering principles. The findings of the study wiD be used in detenninlng whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building pennits will not be issued until evidence of reCOrding a final plat is provided);
COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
iit
~
~
~
~
~
~
n7a
~
~
~
rD
~
~
~
~
~
x
o@
nJ.a
~
o
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
SITE PLAN With the following Information (not to exceed 24- x 36-):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing indiVidual sheets included In pacl(age;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and slructures;
All reqUired setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required siQht triangles;
Identlllcation of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understmy, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and privata utilities. incJudlng fire hyeranls, storm and sanitary sewer lines. manholes and lift stations. gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces. driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of aU required parking lot intertor landscaped areas;
Location of aU solid waste containers. recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201(0)(1) and Index#701};
Location pf all landscape material;
Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
Location of all onsits and offsite storm-water management facllilies;
Location of all outdoor lighting 1bctures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sid_aIks
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, In wriltenltabu/arform:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelUng units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted 10 each use;
Parl<lng spaces: tDtai number, presented in tabular form With the number of requiTed spaces;
Total paved area, including aU paved par/cJng spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Offictal records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure helghls;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F .AR.) for all nonrasldenaal uses
· REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 ~ X 11) and coior rendering If possible
nlo FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, proYlde the following addltlonallnfonnation on site plan:
a One-foot contours or spot elevations on sIe;
iiT;i Offsite elevations If required 10 evaluate the proposed s10rmwater management for the parcel;
~ All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot iines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
structural overhangs;
Tree inventory; prepared by a "certified arborlst", of all trees 8- DBH or greater, reftecUng size, canopy (drip lines) and contlillon of such trees
.-
~
~
~
~
ii7a
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive InfUl Redevelopment Pmject- City of Clearwater
.
.
G. UANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
CJ
~
~
:x:
:x
~
~
:x
:x
:x
.
.
CJ
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed s1rUCtures;
Names of abuttfng stree1s;
Drainage and retention aRIas including swales, side slopes and botllOm elevatJcns;
Delineation and dimensions at an required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight vtsiblUty triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas Including landscaping Islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing tress on-site and Immediately adJacent to the slte, by species, size and loc.aUons, Including drlpllne (as indicated on
required tree survey);
location. size, description, specfffcatJons and quantiUes of all existing and proposed landscape materials, Inc:Iudlng botanical and
common name;
Typical planting details for trees. palms, shrUbs and grDund cover ptants Including Instructions, soil mixes, backftlllng, muldllng and
protectfve measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and Interior landscape coverage. expressing In both square feet and
percentage COY8I'Bd;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions Imposed by the Community Development Board);
IrrlgaUDn notes
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PlAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendermg If posslble)
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level TWo and Three applicatione)
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application. as appJJcable
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMrrTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
CJ STORMWATER PLAN Including the fOllcwlng requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all properly lines:
Proposed gradIng Including finished floor elevations of all strucbJres;
All adJacent streets and munldpaJ storm systems;
Proposed stonnwater delanUonlretenUon area Including lDp of bank. IDe of sklpe and outlet control structure;
Stonnwater calaJlatfons for at:1Bnuatlon and water quality;
Signature at Florida regtstered Professional EngIneer on all plans and caJculadcns
r:J COpy OF: PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWIIIID approval Is required prior to Issuance of City Building Permit). If applicable
1:1 COPY OF STATE AND COUNlY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required In the event the applicallon Includes a deY8Japment where design standards are In Issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project or a Resldentlalln1ll Project.
N/A-See Photographs
CI BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings Including height dimensions, colcrs and materials
1:1 REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of buildIng with colors and materlaW to scale (8 ~ X 11) (black and white and color renderIng, if
posSible) as required
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
· All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs: Provlde photographs and dimensions (area. height, etc.). Indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
N/A
CJ All PROPOSED fnlestandlng and attached signs; Provide details lncIUdlng location, size, height. colors, materials and drawing
r:J ComprehensIVe Sign Program application. as applicable (separate applJcatJon and fee required).
r:J Reduced slgnage proposal (8 J.1i X 11) (color), If SUbmitting Comprehensive Sign Program appllc:atJon.
Page 5 af 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redewlopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
K. TRAFFIc ,IMPACT STUDY: (~~ 13.........oC)
N/A
a 1nabI... ~ It Pftl~ dnIIlIclsI-md dlQlad81fte 6:,""4 ~...,. oI..w.lUJ II/ry ll:Iadwayas acIDpted b t1e Co\npreMnsMl Plan.
'Ynp gtrlllll'llllcn ehlllllle beMd Oft Ule IIICdlt IwCINlI tIIlI&n a1.., ...... of T~. t:~:ll Trip Gsrnml( ~1lIll. ltef<< to Sec:uoD-Hl4l1
C Ofthll ClJInI1lUflly Dr.MIopmw!t CcoGIt i:lr .~Il4I_"1lIqIJhIIIenl
L $lGNAruRE:
#
I. f18 1IIIdel8fQned. ~ thIIt B111'l1p1~"IMd. In 1NI
IIP~, aM t1Ie and ~ .. !he bMt 01 lIlY bIawIIiltae and
....... c.., ~ to Wllllind pboIugntllh ~ ~
dMlIItbed In NIl appbdoll.
(?~)-fl ~c..If}f<l: / ~C.
)t-~~
~ t1f~ri1t~f 0II1'8pNICl~ D2 .
· ...:::Y4-/fr L.<P?VC t!.r /~/<e_ntJei'UT
STA.... CF 1'I.OlII~ COUNTY Of' PMEL.1.A8 -J 2)c {F(
8lo(Dm ~ 8lMI ~ befoRlo., _ .. v~ Clay fit
,....-4' ~ ~411 l1_~h./ AD. :zo~ to _ QtldJat' by'
:'V:. tl L r Il~ (I. . WIIo Ia PBl8DnlJIly known haS
~ /'v'1'! 85
~........
~ P
jrOElJ.d/)(j '--lP {[;)LZ~ ef,Li
. N---..o:-""'f'-
-- '-----yr--1W
'SUSAN' "..
MY COMMlSS='-40310
EXPIRES: August 22, 2<llXS
~ThnI Nolary PuIlIic lJrIdlnIIiD
~ege 6 of 7 - ~ D4t~entApplcab - ~.. ReGeVlk/prDenI ~ ~ of ClMlWIl1CIf
~ /' 'J
':' i .~. ,", . i\!!
il'l~CI~~ ;'nn7 'n'de\'
.
.
M. AFFlDAVlT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
Rmna Square
Sam Colucci. Presidem
(Names of atl PhlPerty DWrI9I11)
,. That (I imNie ale) 1he nwDII'(a) _1SalRl1ltle llaIder(a) of the 1nI1ovf1ng dAttllbetl ~ (add" or .-lalloCllion):
2001-2021 Gulf-to-Bay BoulvvdandSll S. HerculcsATaluc.
2.. TlJat this ~ COI'IGttbIte3 tile plCpOrty fDrwlliln I NqU8It 101' a: (_CiIIla ~
Comprehensive 10ml Redevelopment Proj~.
Robert PergoIizzi. AICP
1. Tllattbe u~ (M1IihaIIe) lIppoilled and (4aes1do)atlPClnt
Gulf Coast CoQ3\llting. IDe.. and:Ed AnnstrDna, Jobmon. Pope, et al
.. {~r) Ig.nt(aj lD ~ any pefIIIoM or oUler Ib:wnIIIts II8Il8IIiIIY b"'lUllII plltaJn:
'3. Tbat11'llt at!'ill8I/I na. bien ell8CUtdd ~ JftdUce .,. CIty rI a.n18br, ~ to caneIder and act on 1I\e abclYe dasClit.*l ~
4. That~applclnt aatnowledQt$CI1l1tallrnllid_ (Plrisand 1IICl1RIb\.1r:ift:.1llc.) wi be P8Il! PRIOR In ItwI UlRneeofabuilltng permit,
~ of ~, fI olbermKllanlllll, WhlChevel'ClCarIIlrse.:
5. That;slte vilIt> to the propllrty M1l'1'J~ bJ CitY f8II'lII6nlalt#es h OI'di!!r 10 ~ this appllcallon ana lhs DWlT8r aumortB City
repl'tl$f:ll~ma to YiIIt and ~8Ilb the properly dlIscltblld In ItIIs appltaacrr.
6. That (I"), tile Ul\itlln;igntel aU!llIIly, hBreby.:e"" hill1d _going " .,. end
tfJ~# ~Vr1teE k
COUNTY OF PlNEu.As
em... .5/l/f
STATI OF nORmA,
O~(/e ~f.
f
" 2' )"~
~m.lhI1I1llln1!1Nd, ..~rduly oollllMlllolled ~"'1BwI db SID at RlridI. on tills ;J.., ,..) '''- ',- day of
:it'i}h:1HbtJ', 2C (~ s:er!Ill1IIy~ ~Jaj'n Ct {u,CO wtlo~ beenl'btdaly$lNll
~ - aays that I'ltI.tll8 . IwI8e eigned. 'i '~_
Mil Comm-..i.- c:.........: " j:.~\'$!,8.:~,\ " '~'''iil~ .f f ,,1 d /L" / . ~)tl/~f{
, -..---- ;~; 1':]', '" ~~YljtlllllW~'DD1<<J3101..-~V' j,(.. .
~ -~~~~/ ..F~~S;A\IiiIIit..axJ6 j NataryPmIk:
L1.:';':,~:'~" ,~~__"Ii~ 1 i
S':'IPIMIIIbg~~~~.,.."idI~tIltJ2._
Paae 7 of 1-FlmdbIc .DevclopDlCllt AppI~'\'e lDfiU ~ Projcct-City ofClearwa:let
0/0 '.J 77(\(:'I1U
l!l~ Q i : R ~ n n 7 'n' d e:~
.
, ~-
,.
LEGAl DESCRIPlION
LOTS 1 lllROUGH 12, MIDWAY SUBDIVlSJON. ALSO THE STRIP OF LAND
LYING 'A(ST OF AFOREMENTIONED LOTS 1 AND 12 AND EAST OF lHE
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF HERCULES AVENUE BEING BOUNDED ON lHE NORTH BY
A WESTERLY PRQ..lClION OF THE NORTH UNE OF SAID LOT 1 AND
BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY A WESTERLY PR().(CTION OF THE SOU1H
UNE OF SAID LOT 12, ACCORDING TO THE WAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 4, OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF
PINElLAS COUNTY, flORIDA (SUB.ECT TO ANY MAINTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY
QAlUED BY LOCAL OR STATE GOVERNUENT).
flOOD ZONE
THE ABOVE DESOijBEO PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE X, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIRM MAP OF THE CITY OF UIARWA TER, flORIDA,
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 125096-0016-0, MAP REVISED AUGUST 19,
1991.
PREPARED FOR: ROUA SQUARE. INC.
RDMAN AND ROUAN, PA
.
.
ROMA SQUARE COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION
NARRATIVE SUMMARY
1. The request is for flexible development approval to permit a problematic use (check
cashing operation) in the Commercial district with reductions to setbacks, parking
requirements, reductions of landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Hercules
Avenue, and Rogers Street, and establishment of a comprehensive landscape program,
and comprehensive sign program.
2. The applicant Roma Square, Inc. and one of its tenants (ACE Cash Express) are
expending substantial funds to upgrade the site which is substandard according to the
current code. The improvements include providing substantial landscaping along Gulf to
Bay Boulevard, reducing the impervious surface, providing interior landscaping where
none presently exists, resurfacing/restriping the existing parking lot, modifying and
providing for access by eliminating two driveways to Gulf to Bay Boulevard.
3. The "redevelopment" does not include adding any floor area to the existing building. It
contemplates the removal of the R&W Pawn Shop (an existing problematic use) to
accommodate the expansion of the existing Ace Cash Express store. ACE Cash Express
has entered into an agreement with R& W Pawn to "buyout" their lease and expand,
thereby eliminating an existing problematic use on the site. As discussed at DRC, we
propose the timeframe for obtaining FDOT Access Permits, buying out the lease and
applying for building permits for interior renovations be 6 months after CDB approval.
4. Interior landscaping will be introduced to the front of the site at the request of DRC.
Interior landscaped islands will break up the "sea of asphalt" that presently exists and the
parking area will be retrofitted to include 100 standard spaces, including 4 handicapped
accessible spaces (114 required by code). A parking study was completed to demonstrate
this will be adequate to accommodate parking demands.
5. Sidewalk will be added along Rogers Street where none exists.
6. A central dumpster will be utilized and enclosed.
7. Existing signage is proposed to remain. Modifications of the freestanding sign panels
will be introduced to provide a more common color scheme except where corporate color
schemes are utilized. Addresses on the freestanding signs will be changed from vertical to
horizontal.
.
.
SUMMARY
The proposed modifications will significantly improve the appearance of the site and the
view along Gulf to bay Boulevard. The approval of this project will eliminate a
problematic use (pawn shop) along Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Flexibility is necessary to
accomplish the goals of the project and the end result will be a significant improvement
over existing conditions.
t.
...
.
.
A.
~-~
-.- ...
A-C'E
1231 Greenway Drive
Sui'te 600
irvmg,. Texas 750~8
Tel; (9-72) 550-5000
AMCD::A': CA:;u E:;u;;.
November 26, 2003
~n G' . r,!" !
III, !.._.:..... .
.......--...,. -, t
,.<j
, i) !; ~ 1'; !: ~
ULjf .)J i i
,--
P .....,--"--.,.-_."--,,.._-,,.~_.,
LANNi;.,... . ..... '..">' ......j ~~G~
CI T'f Or CLt.AFWvAl ER
This lener evidences the iiitentof ACE Cash Express, Iiic., it Texas cotpOtatioii f'B"u -, 0 an .
agreement with Rob Orkisz and Walt Orkisz (individually and collectively, "Shareholder") ofR&W
Pawn and Jewelry ("R& W"), collectively Shareholder and R& W hereinafter (the "Sen~, the result 'of
which Buyer will purchase all of Seller's interest in the lease of approximately 7 () 0 square feet of
space at 2007 Gulf-To-Bay Blvd. in CleatWater, Florida (the "Lease") on the following general terms and
conditions.
Rob and WaIt 0rJcisz
R&W Pawn and Jewehy
2007 Gulf-To-Bay Blvd.
C1earwater~ FL .33765
CeDtIemeD,
1. Subject to ~ conditions -set forth in this letter, including but not limited to the negotiation. and
execution of a Definitive Agreement (defined below), Buyer will purchase from Seller all of
Seller''s interest in the Lease {the "Buyoutj for.
(a) A cash payment from Buyer to Seller at closing equal in amount to. _ .
("Buy-Out Fee");
(b) an assignment and conveyance from Seller to Buyer of the Lease, with such terms
and conditions acceptable to Buyer, including express written consent from the
Landlord of the Lease approving the transfer of the leasehold estate~ _
(~) Buyer's ability to obtain all necessary licenses, permits and assurances permitting
it to operate its check cashing operation at the Leased location;
(d) Seller's covenant and agreement toreftain from engaging in any check -cashing
business or from offering payday loans or deferred deposit services for
five years following the closing of the Buyout tbat is located within a 5 mile
radius of any of Buyer's, Buyer's affiliates. or Buyer's franchisees' locations;
p .
( e) Seller's agreemenno cooperate with Buyer in obtaining the necessary permits, consents,
-assipmeBts -and li~ md
(f) :for ead1 Seller and Buyer to pay its own cxpcnscs in performing its due diligem:c
hereunder and closing expenses
(g) Buyer agrees to place two small signs (max of 1 foot x 1 foot) in its store, notifying
customers oiR& W's new address, If appllcahie, for a period of 60 days.
..
..
.
.
and anticipated by the Buyer and Seller to be conditioned upon and subject to the . satisfaction, of
subsectioDS (a) - (g) of Section 1, above.
Agreed and Accepted this ;).. <6 day of ..AJ 0 v . , 2003.
Sellers:
Shareholders
By:
Name:
By:
Name:
B"y:
, Name:
Title~
R&W Pan & JeweJiy '\
41ti~
By:
Name:
Titicr.
Sincerely,
A~~
Mike ~';key- ->
Vice PresidentIFilWl&:e
1.,. "~."1
". I _ .
'CONFlDENTIAL
~}
.
~ Clearwater
o
Planning and Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
T~ephone:727~-4567
Fax: 727 ~-4576
C #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATlAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
Cl SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPUCATlON
Cl SUBMIT 1 COPIES OF llIE ORIGINAL APPUCATlON Including folded site plans
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
NORllI:
SOU1lI:
WEST:
EAST:
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
NAME f\orAA ~ ~-r~
ADDRESS: CoWlR 0 - u: 1D ~ 'BLlID.4- !-\ERGUU;S Aub.
The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or
Level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive
Landscape Program, which satisfies the fOllowing criteria. The use of landscape plans; sections/elevations.
renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addition to the informati'Jii
provided on this worksheet:
1. Architectural Theme.
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural
theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
ACGe0/7 driv€.Wo..lj,s ho.~ beef) d.eer~~ed in wl'd+h OJ)d
iLL.i4UD.f)-b'hL+--p~ ~ ~ k2 s~ d~
aJ'dO~ltW, ~u)at.e.r r n- wiD ~--,I~~ it-a.j~
~~~~~:~~~~~~.~
JDr:lh>- v,te., {'_reQ<tl~ ~~~~I' ru<.iD.AJ} ~;::'i~ Qt
~ "~kA'clw} nna ? SljnCtC-fJ ~.
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the
parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards.
P1.AI~NING & DEVb.Cr .' oJV ~
CITY OF CLEAFNA I r R
.
.
2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed asa part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so
that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
~~"II~hM~ ~~ not~y'1hi'" ~
~~ Wi~V(dod tOo_ n _a.nd ~Ir~inj
~)hS,
3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will
enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
The ~i~-kn~ ~i+.e.., ha~ minima) land~..Lf?e.) -the, r.ernaindu
~~I~:~~J i~~~~~~
~~~bi~:2;~I~~L~~t~
4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have
a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
~ .
.
.
5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape
Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and
adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
~tcl- opplicab~
Please return checklist for review and verification.
~/~
G g re of applicant)
Zbe./ffr~'?)!lZ-lI
4d0 vrn~ d tfs<td
Date: 1/:2 /04-
, / I
~. annlu..Dtinn fnrrnc/li.".lnl"'lft"'ll8nt na"N:nu/r-nrnnnahAnc-i,,. l.nrlRf"'"...... nrnnr8ft't annlirosdinn Ii,.."..
.
n ~ rr~ r~1l Wi ~ rm
UIJAN-;-~lill
h.AJ'jNi~JG & OL\,t:l Of-'rIlH:NT SvC~
ClfYOF CU:AF1'NAlER
>-
t:
z
U
:>
~
~
~
Z
~
U<
~~ o.:l
Z Ifi
Z~ .....
-< o.:l ~
s: Co:!
~O :z
~ ;
~~ ~ 0
~~~ CIi' r:
0\
o "'00 N ....-
~
=~~ - Eo-
== :z
~~ ~ ;:;l
oo.~-< :z 0
~ U
<~ 0 ~
~~~ Eo- j
M ...
.... o.:l
z :z
-<<~ 0 -
- ~
~~~ t)
o.:l
O~ ~
oo.U
-<
~
0
~
z~ \
\
;?-W.
-- '
I - I H.I.I. :i i
1I"IIi rH ""r. ~."~i i
l ! - rX ! I L . - i I
<I: I!J i ~!!~i. iHi!ii .I~:::' I il
E- _I ll" _I If!. .3 .::" Ii
~ I!' -: 3 .. q Iii l
~ I "Ui !~.I I;;;; g il
55 . ,. ~MI !" Iil> .... ~. L- !I
~I e!. .;!Ui ~H~ 3t~_ ;i.
il -: 5..~~ ~ I!
i Iii !"
! g i ! .. I ,~
! ! U 8'813' Hl!s ~:K
ili ;in ~ fiH;1 lUll I ; d i:
'3li
l~~
,it
t) j!l!i'
~ 1"li
z 15
~ 15
; !~i.
5 '
-.
~.
M5
.
d
z
-
\
un
Ii.:_
l- aact,.
~ ~ ;;,i:
ti~
w<(
......
Viw
... Cl
wr
)( WQ:O
~ Qi~~
z j a:::2i I/)
- ~I ~a ~
" ooco
Z ua... z
~
..
i>::
Q
~ - N n
01 ClD~ ~
(f) '" I '"
w i~ tii
a: ... E U ~~
a.. >- 0 - u - "-.
X -ci fI) ~ :; llt~~
W Ise~ ~:.: !i~
~ sfi~" ~ _0..
-elf; ~':': '.
0$9 ,,~
W
o
-e
z
o
E=
0-
ii:
u
00
rzl
Q
..J
<(
"
~
."1 i
j;!-
li~! !
II
.'~ f
I!I
~'I
~i!
~Ii' "l
~~, I.
I ~=j If
I iill
1S1fl13Hldl:A
.
.
...- ]
z A J
o II.
~ i ~II I
~ ~~... ." li :I!
" ulSIHiailli8R lill=.i
~ I .......
~ ;:=111 ..:.!~ .
~ ~~~. ~. .'~~i!
w ...t.liUlilSt.~
~
~'"
~i
~!
>w
:;
15
a~
~ 51
i\>>.~
l.;"
i /~
,
1 ,i:
!
; '~~
I
I,;
I'.:
'1
i.
-if!
t~j
,
I::.
I.::'.
:\
~!*
~,
~.
~;
~;
01 :.
~ ,
II!".
!.~ol.
'~Im! .:. .-- so
--
.1
::;"1
lQ
~
~ i ~1
i'
~.,;
<1.'
, .:
i.,
1 _
\ ~;
i~
,
I .>>:.:-
i 0 !'c:J
, . .1alt:
L----""j
I i.1 -
~ Wii
~".y~--~,=-
e:. f
d:; II I:
;--
"
h
r1 "'I
, .
;~I; UI
!.
~ !~i
Il~
I~
~Ii
o::!s
e;(;j
ffi~
~1'i
,,2:
0'--'
"'!:l
<"
t
pO
u ~
~ .~
l:i~ !!l~
...~ ~-
~il,"~
LU~t:gi
ai ~~:l~
~a ~~
... ..
~ ~
~
If
if ~
.0 fI
(l! ui.!
Hr,ij
~ hUi
f6
.
iJ:~
. I Ii ,
I II~ I 1'= I
i II!!
i hl' I I
fA-~AUil I
~ u l!j1tii !
~=~'Iql'fif i
i ;11 a~i II
z: :t g .II
I~!~'i i h
le;tw~ i Ii
~I~~'ig !I.,!I:
dIll i
f! I I; i
~ 1"11= II
I - I.
I - r: i',
I I, II .Uii~
i : ~ :;Ui~
.,' g hlHli
Iii i :'I~:I
i,l, Ilh,f.
J' iii Ii I
=~~ g..~:i!!:I
: '" 1:1 (,.
I,; f! : ! ~ il H !tJ 'P ii
:1_ !II! i It tl 't :~ !'i II
'. f!', · S d 1 ~ 16 fl
!! fli I ; !I 'g n fi; !Ii ~
I !II ia ~ i ~ h, if Pi ;~ g
!'i, ;q !: I e r.t ji Q. Ie iil
'i!l( Pill j!! .U II m ~n,1f
e! 'I ,. II 'Ii ~. !'iI.1
I ~~J ~ ~i nl !ri ~.! ~II!B Jd
ili;.. '( i Illf ~
,IU' J I I 11.1 ~
!bIli ! ~t.p m'! ~i i
1'14JJM1il,
Ii,...' .
.1 til : II ~ If.'IJ iis l
I f II "'U'I. i:' I
i g~!!iI g U~ Hi dUn ~~ d
r--u--
~~:. ~ I
I 'Il:~;
. I L :
1 ! r i
I
I II!
... . i I
~ u'
i ~. i
<> I J <
sil
! . .
,II
pi
Iii
...
n:
U~i
;1
I..
- j
" Hi ~~
I ! !hJlh
I . .hl is
! ,i iliun
Uhllmml
mn I;iii;;
..... ''':::'i
I
.
i
.1
t.
I
.
~
1=
I ~
. ~
I >.
i' -
i .
~'i
".1.
hll
I h.
f ES!
.
"
I
-. r
i
I ~
-'1 j
I I~
I _
1. _ L
-= J.
rl-~_-1
1 ~j
;11; IJ
!.
,
- ,
~ l~!
~ I
iIi i-~
h
"'"
z'"
iS~
0...
~~
~~
0",
:ii!=l
-0(0
;:!Z
~
- ~
u ,
<!: Ii
iii", ll"
~I; ~e
~U<q~
...~j:!j;i
3i~;l:l~
~~ ~~
!j -
<c i
~
;;
~f
.. .
~1 ..
H~
sHlli
~\,
\~. .-- !
,(~_.......-./
ll~ -I! il.
. .
-~ ~~rf1~ In' !
~ ~ I I 111111111111111111111 ::.:::::.::.,
. t~ !!m!'~'~~!~~!!!~~!! 'II 1111
,J. ..... .J..i. ~1.:'1. i;:. 'I~.'.' ~'..llIrn. i i.' I' . .. ....
:c:.,]'HJl'~ ~ C ,1' ,
.: ;1,i;;11]1:~. 1111" ~
' 1, I '1 II I I '
,. '., 1 ,. : '.i... ,
_~__..__.J____1', ',_~__,~_---------,
I I ....
I ,
f --1
I
I I
III I .11 ~ I
11111111
~
-'
::)
\2
:~
~
~
~
~
.....................
I W
en
I
.
~.JIDI.Y1
GVaoI raLWiIIlI
WIm'Y~
'MJIJo.WHlL...mD tIlN8nrJIIiII
~3J.N3:) 3Wn~ 'fflC>>l
..../ -./
,,--. - ~
-'"'J :.
.
~,
I!
~! I
~JII ·
~ ........~.... I..=-
ClZ &... ...l ."".
IiIMII -,...
E ..........!..... I
...........4444.......
=!
I
elll-!.
;
. :JI
!2
!~
e
~
~
!
I
I ,~ DB\V!a11m3H
a
Ql
~
UJ
~
::)
o
to
~
to
~
Ll.
~
::)
~
.
.
dIt=
\-
W
W
~
\-
~
~
~
w
~
o
~
3nN3AY 931nJ~3H
I.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
II.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30
31.
32.
.
.
ROMA SQUARE
PHOTOS IN LIEU OF BULDING ELEV A nONS AND SIGNAGE PLAN
North property line looking east along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
West property line looking south along Hercules Avenue.
Northwest comer of site as viewed from parking lot.
West elevation as viewed from Hercules Avenue.
West elevation as viewed from Hercules Avenue.
West elevation as viewed from Hercules Avenue.
West property line looking south toward daycare center.
West property line looking north in front of daycare center.
South property line looking east along Rogers Street.
Front of daycare center looking north.
South elevation of daycare center, looking west along Rogers Street.
Daycare center playground as viewed from Rogers Street.
Rear parking lot along Rogers Street.
Rear parking lot.
East property line looking north toward Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
East property line looking north toward Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
Looking west along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard from east property line.
North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
Looking west along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard from east property line.
North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
Parking lot along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
North property line looking west toward Hercules Avenue.
North property line looking west toward Hercules Avenue.
Comer sign at Gulf-to-Bay/Hercules intersection.
Roma Square as viewed from north side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
South property line looking west along Rogers Street.
East property line looking north.
rc
i j ',; I I '..:'
;::' II i \ j, I;
---.,..-'-,-".,. ,...,..'."."'.'.........--..'...-", II,
i ,,: "
JAN ~ 1 20~: jlill
PLAI~NjNG & OtVELOPMtNT SvC~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Signage Calculations
Freestanding signs:
2 pole signs 20 feet by 6 feet = 240 s.f
Awning Signage: 3 feet by 258 feet = 774 s.f on north elevation
Awning Signage: 3 feet by 81 feet = 243 feet along west elevation
Note:
Photos taken by Florida Design Consultants, Inc. (FDC) March 2003. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. has verified the
accuracy of these photos and FDC shall have no responsibility regarding these photos.
-
e
~~;I
::1
"
!,:j
:~
,1
1
I
i
~.
"
" ' ",,';"
~....~
1,,<l>!olI,
-',
~; ;;:)<.~~"'\'':-;;~-: :tft.~rj:' :'
,_ "..':l"({. hl~ ,'~.
"',~-.':<;...~.,., - .,.ll:;~~
:'.. ,~ J
'1
.~~
.
e
---
\
---I
i
~'--
.----.
-_____. __ .___~_ u______ -
==::3
.~
---
d
~..I;:.;;,.tc.I,'--:!,.
. '. 1,. ~
. """
&a":"
'.-.
,,1:>,':' ~.,
I'.'~~'-' -".~..):. ..
,ca_
JB .....~- - . ·
I~.~"~~ - .,
L~
.,.-: :.v.:;-IHr :::.:_..,.,~.i~r: (~;I
3
jOtl.',
'''.~
,,'
. _ '--7;:'':;;-;-;C;;
w..Mi\11, TUXEDO
.,.~" SALES&REHTALS
-.- _.~-.- _."~
baSeBalL viDEo .... i", ,
cARds GamEs
::';:I;~"~'i':;:" :~;~~~:;!i"'
',!I':""I~i;::~Ii,;'!fil'
",:"'tll:'t..~~~;.,,Ii,~,
4
.
-
.
baSe BaiL viDEo '/'.0' .,'.
cARds GamEs
'1.-.... .~.;:.~ -'-'"
20 cent
WAteR
.:::~.,.-........ .,'
5
'~;'c':;'" ";:;C'~;C-. .-'-, '_."1
, Of.lIL', r<rm Wid' f~ 20 cent
ER rAcinG ComicS WAteR
~ All (:LEAR~II,TER POLICE
"OEP1I1lTMENT OFfiCERS ARE c
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTA1IVE.
10 ADVISE ANY PERSON
"0 I EAVE 1HESE PREMISES
FAIL~IRE 10 VACAT~ THE PREMIS
linER BElNG SO INS1RUClED
~AY RESULl IN AN ARRES1
fO'R 1RESPASS AfTER WARNIN
'.' ....,.
6
.
-
I
I
I
,
"/
)"
f
J
/
- /---
I -"--'
/
;1..
'\
\
~---~.
7
,.;''1r.
1=~c"..D
, CEI<TER
.... LANE
~ ~~-
... ;'I ~ '-.
~~l~:LY
~ ".'
,.
\-1
.1
I,
.~
f
, oi-l
,;~~wT~>
,. ~1 ~
.oil
~~.l'
~~"~t~~:~,,:,/~~,~.,,~jf:'.~k:.
::iH/,.. t\Io""""~:~"""''' ~~I"'~~~r2J"_:t-:~I'';~' '~,,'
~"':'~;~::" i.;'"t~~~~...-\,;~~'r..>-, .t-~~.~t'~:i,tl~,.. .11' 1~1
'<~.1:.~~o " ;<..,.,,,,~~,,,..t,,.,, ,:.:.,<~~;;~.~1~. ::~
{,~~~j~, ":t7~~-i.\"1~"'~.,~:, ~'~:~;:;i~~~.:;~:;.~t~"i~~'J~r~~:~~':~~
. .:.. ". .'..., ..". ..,.,"Ii..,\.......:'t~,~.,~~}"'.
~'>.:i. '.... .... f. . '''''',,'''.: ..'.,.",' '.; . ..,.,,: .:~, .~.'
'1"1;;.' ..,.. '\' .~. '."" i. i'lf~':' .~....,.\. 1.. ........... "" ~~;",~...
~~~iit~>~-"~?-,~~.'~<~.<~ "~:~-~.-~~,.~',':.~~ _',....~'.':,='~,', ,:",~~,J;,;
, ~.~,.,.,)i.,4.,..,<<;; '.. ''-'~ \.~ ..~~~",~~
, '; "~:~:~.~~~~~;~;:~:],::;l~,~~..;.;, ..J~~~~:~\~J~~~~~~i~
8
--
--
\1.',
'-k, ,,-,~~~,
..'~i'l~L'.. 9
\~+:r~Hi~::~~;:" c.,' "
}
I
I
I
.~
~.-
10
e
I
- ,," .
4JC~~;~i~T"
...~J
-,~ . ,y'
~~.;w,~~'
. '.";
11
--~
-
~-'l~
Iii :,".,1 X. '"i;
. I! '-~;;;~r'/~~J1l:'
ir~ ~ .-.. .-
,: " 'f ~_.
I : I
~! W ....
r ,.. t,
~
-~'~~~
. , "
...v.,~~~~_1K -
, , ,
12
.
--
13
J ,,(I,IU,,LJ!
r
~c..l~
---..,
.
.
~ 'r
~'I/'~",""".
-',
i
I-
.
, ; ~~~~'IH "~~lrl
.-..-'
r'~" "
, ",.,."flll!i'm&
"'h'~~l#' "
14
e
'T.... f ,.(
,....
'.
, . -;--.
..,....~...'f_
...
.,.":"
"'h...
--,/
15
J." '.' l(.,l_,..
r ~~:,
aril_
-t r. .11 ;;;;;'~~" "
. ,~( j ,11' l_Cl";,,~
"'-~;:' -
~.a.~
,~"',',;,,,
.1"~.' ,...,,''':.(
~ . ,
,
~EII
."""""
., \<'tIoo;_,...."
: ,<.-' :'~~:ir~;i~:
f'::'~~~::~Cib,,:'
....:...-~,~'."
',. ," '- :'!~:/~;7~~
'"
. :',-'.......~"."
C'I~W.~~<
16
[ sr. 20' HT. X 6' WIDE
'~r
I'
t:~ F:~PtL
rAt..: '-:~Itll!: 11);l
'P~i'"ll .lO,'flR'f ~
t..~C':'~ L~> ~ ,ji~'C: ~.
Sr~\:~~. :;~;'/:::}:'; .; i
e
4
'tjl
q ~
17
:il.~""~ Rl_D"lrull.~ltllr.[lntl"r~lt~~lItt(.... .
r ~R" 'C'J'" 'T/,'AI/'
C,. L ,- IY(')' ..........'.'~' '~'.'
CAR' O' ''00 ~!i1'
~_.' ~...> 'g~.~llii.'
" ~
,.
:-.---'----.--"1
I,
,
I
.,
"
,,'I
I
.\' .
'\ .
". '........
. .
. . .
,: ,
I~
'J:~
18
...
-
-
--~
'I
I,!R f::!,I:l, :
~--:; ;:"JI~q:;qI
C~'I,II . JEWELRY I
;l:'~;)~ '; ,.n ~ G'PO~ ~ I j .
SHAI'ERS .'::.:;.:';','~:: ~ ,
:> : ::: Ii:.." _ ~ ~..'~)
,~
'tjl
~ .
t .~,:
I~',
',~ ...
........ .
'~1/d."
19
~
~
Ii" 1 Ii ..'
~::J:~;~
!:.',t l,i,l
f~OKir)!! ~!,
:;rU\\I I:~.
, . r ~
f!"~1~1l11ll u"c ".
OUse 445-1998 aptams PIZza
In TOwn m
"
- "~,,-,,,.
,-0",."
20
-
-
FLORIDA SUBS Be GYROS
21
22
e
-
23
24
e
--
----- "---
l\K
5
. '-" -.
~A~~ JEWElR~
~
25
..- III __-
~ JEWELRY
26
e
e
--------
27
---
-------
'II~'-'-'--
; ""fl.
, ! .' T- "~
'. .. .~.~ft'Z-"~..'... '....
,. ~,...~- ".
. t ,.."""J.Ii....... '; .' ~r,.
" .~l& .l.t.. .
.j"(\ "H _ ,......
,...........'.,....,
28
e
----=--=:::
r
~/ .
l~
..... --
n.~
La~lai:, p'-"
~
((fIl ~~l
~
~Dl GARDEI/
:~--
,\f,\ 'l: I ~~,
~"'d':
1 , "_
.... 1 ~, ~'v
. "'.
-S\c;N zd ~.' 'I- () W\OE.
;_';1
~ -----
'-.
1."'1>11"'-
""1
I,. i
. .;<;:
;, .~~".,
- iilIi&t. -" I
~..., . -:_"
I
!
at:::ll!:H
_...~<>I'l
.~.
:,;.,..,
II~~."."'" ......
~ ) " , .
...;"",' ... I'
,I ....0" ;"'"1''' · .
f.....,.. ,
. !t I
~ +:
-:e:l~"oIf.'
29
',I"
r
I
t
30
-
~.
:"i
'-':,~-...
, l ;"'f ; f ~1,
\:i
ijl.'.'..,
~"''.:
,,:1 it "'~
d~ " !
.".i'~.'". "
'i"~~:;.~
j' i'l
"",, ,fl.",
_' '~r ~ ',"'i:: ':I~~"
...,$"
~ ~' .1
..
.,tT~
,,,. ';1 ,!~, ~:w:fr
'. . .\lf~
~i~', i
,;~,~~
,\'1
~'
I,
:~.
,I . ,,~I
,11..
31
C,.'f,:l4 1fT
*.""],":r::"!~~.~.-......l..t.~~:~_ "\ :'...\
..~-"'.----....
'J. 't,4iilLBJ' ~~~:c~.::..~~ x:'" ,I.\..'
. [ ~--~.'.~"'-.. ~" /.1
.. -. /, ....\~;;,
I . . '-J ..
'"'~h.
32
.
.
PARKING ANALYSIS
FOR
ROMA SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
~d~"
.~ . \ ~1 fc: \ "i
; I"\~'\!\
Dr.:" .. . ",-.- \" \
r"-'~- "\11
: \ \
<'. ,~... ,\ ,\ \
\ \\ \ jAN 13. 2 t~,jO~ , \~)
u u\ ._-(' I~"';'
_ '" ~'~",tJ'i1 ...Vvv
Pa.J\liN~* ~~ctEARWA1ER
PREPARED FOR:
ACE CASH EXPRESS
PREPARED BY:
GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC
OCTOBER 2003
PROJECT # 03-027
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
ll. METHODOLOGY
ID. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
IV. CONCLUSION
0J~
Robert Pergolizzi, AICP
AICP # 9023
.
.
.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Roma Square shopping center is located on the southeast comer of Gulf-to-
Bay Boulevard and Hercules Avenue. The 1.98 acre site contains general retail
sales and services establishments (2001-2021 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard) and a
daycare center (511 S. Hercules Avenue) and is located in the Commercial (C)
zoning district. According to strict interpretation of Section 2-702 of the
Clearwater Community Development Code the site should contain 114 parking
spaces. Presently due to site constraints the site contains 90 parking spaces.
The site is being evaluated as a Comprehensive In:fill Redevelopment Project
although no change to the building area will occW'. Per Section 7-704 of the
Community Development Code a reduction in the required parking is allowed if
the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area thap otherwise
required. The site contains several businesses that do not appear to generate
significant parking demand. This parking analysis was prepared to determine the
availability of parking spaces at the Roma Square site.
n. METHODOLOGY
Prior to conducting this analysis a methodology was established with City of
Clearwater staff. It was agreed that a parking accumulation study would be
conducted on a Friday and Saturday between 11 AM and 7 PM, and parking
accumulation would be recorded at 30-minute intervals. License tag numbers
were used to identify vehicles that occupied a space for more than one interval.
Information on average parking duration, business hours and number of
employees for each business was also requested.
ill. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
Existing conditions were established by conducting parking lot observations
between the hours of 11 AM and 7 PM on Friday October 3,2003 and Saturday
October 4, 2003. Both days were partly sunny (85 degrees) representing typical
October weather and Clearwater High School was in session on Friday. The
Roma Square site contains a total of 90 paved parking spaces of which 30 are
located behind the building in a parking area accessed by Rogers Street. The
majority of the parking is located in two rows adjacent to the building and the
sidewalks along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Hercules Avenue. There are also on-
street parking spaces on Hercules Avenue that were not included in this study.
The Kids Garden daycare center has 2 vans that are parked in a separate lot and
three employee spaces in an unpaved area in front of the building. It operates
weekdays 7 AM - 6 PM with a total of 8 employees and some employees park in
the Roma Square lot. Children are dropped off and picked up by parents.
Businesses located in the shopping center are as follows:
.
.
Business Address Hours Emolovees
Boa's Card Shop 2021 Gulf M-F 9AM-6PM 2 total
To Bay Blvd. Sat 9AM-5PM 1 per shift
Florida Subs 2019 Gulf 24hrs 2 employees
and Gyros to Bay Blvd 7 days per shift
Advance Phones 2015 Gulf M-F 10AM--6PM 1 employee
To Bay Blvd. Sat 10AM-4PM
Coin Laundry 2011 Gulf 24 hours None
To Bay Blvd. 7 days
Captains Pizza 2009 Gulf 11AM-3AM 6 total,
To Bay Blvd. 7 days 3 per shift
R& W Pawn 2007 Gulf M-F 10AM-6PM 2 total,
To Bay Blvd. Sat 12-2:30 PM 1 per shift
ACE Cash Express 2005 Gulf M-Sat 9AM-8PM 2 total,
To Bay Blvd. Sun 10AM-4PM 1 per shift
Mr. Formal 2001 Gulf M- W 10AM-6PM 3 total,
To Bay Blvd Thur 10AM-7PM 1 per shift
Fri 10AM-6PM
Sat 10AM-4PM
Appliance Service 2oo1-A Gulf M-F 9AM-5PM 1 employee
To Bay Blvd. Sat 9AM-12Noon
Video Games &
Water Store
2oo1-B,C,D Gulf
to Bay Blvd.
M-F 10AM-7PM
Sat lOAM-5PM
Sun 12Noon-5PM
3 total,
1 per shift
.
.
Fridav. October 3. 2003
On Friday parking demand in the shopping center parking lot varied from a low of
19 occupied spaces (21 %) at 11:00 AM to a peak demand of 44 occupied spaces
(49%) at 1:30 PM, which coincides with dismissal of Clearwater High School.
Interviews with tenants confirm much of the parking lot usage is by students after
school and friends meeting students after school. As such, there were a minimum
of 46 mused parking spaces throughout the afternoon and evening. On the
average the parking lot has 31 occupied spaces (34% occupied), an average of 8
spaces are used by employees, an average of 23 spaces are used by customers and
the average parking duration is 50.2 minutes. Table 1 provides a semi-hourly
tabulation and Figure 1 provides a graph of the semi-hourly parking space
occupancy.
Saturday. October 4. 2003
On Saturday parking demand in the shopping center parking lot varied from a low
of 16 occupied spaces (18%) at 5:30 PM to a peak demand of38 occupied spaces
(42%) at 2:00 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 52 mused parking spaces
throughout the afternoon and evening. On the average the parking lot had 28
occupied spaces (32% occupied), an average of 7 spaces are used by employees,
an average of21 are used by customers and the average parking duration is 44.09
minutes. The difference in parking demand as compared to Friday is attributable
to Clearwater High School being closed on Saturdays. Table 2 provides a semi-
hourly tabulation and Figure 2 provides a graph of the semi-hourly parking space
occupancy.
IV. CONCLUSION
. This parking analysis was conducted in accordance with the methodology
established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates the existing
90 parking spaces on-site are sufficient to accommodate parking demand for the
existing businesses on-site. Typically the spaces near the front of the stores are
occupied:first by customers for a short duration with high turnover. Spaces in the
rear of the site and directly along Gulf-to-Bay. Boulevard are primarily used by
employees parking for the entire work shift, although many customers use these
spaces. The 8 spaces along Hercules Avenue are partially used by employees and
occasionally used by Clearwater High School students at 1 :30 PM dismissal on
weekdays.
.
ROMA SQUARE PARKING ANALYSIS
Table 1 Friday October 3, 2003
TIME OCCUPIED
TOTAL % OCCUPIED
11:00 AM 19 90 21%
11:30AM 28 90 31%
12 NOON 35 90 39%
12:30 PM 34 90 38%
1 :00 PM 28 90 31%
1 :30 PM 44 90 49%
2:00 PM 27 90 30%
2:30 PM 33 90 37%
3:00 PM 33 90 37%
3:30 PM 29 90 32%
4:00 PM 27 90 30%
4:30 PM 29 90 32%
5:00 PM 32 90 36%
5:30 PM 30 90 33%
6:00 PM 33 90 37%
6:30 PM 33 90 37%
7:00 PM 30 90 33%
524 1530
AVERAGE PARKING DURATION
AVERAGE OCCUPANCY
Minutes
<30
30<60
60<90
90<120
120<150
150<180
180<210
210<240
240<270
270<300
300<330
330<360
360<390
390<420
420<450
450<480
>480
total
Vehicles
168
23
12
2
5
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
o
2
o
5
228
--
50.20 Minutes
31 34%
g:!:
! coo.
I
I
I g:!:
i .00.
I
1
j g:!:
!
.00.
g:!:
'"io..
M g:!:
0
0 '"io.
N
-
M
~ g:!:
W Mo.. ~
m
0 0
~ g:!: LL.
0 Mo. 0
0 w
~ ::E
g~ i=
C No..
ii::)
U. " g~
"I"'"
W No..
~
::J g~
C)
i:L ~ ~o..
i
g~
~o..
0
~~
NO.
~
Z
NO
'-0
Z
0
~~
,-<(
,-
0
C?:!:
,-<(
,-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
en CO ..... CO ll) "If' C") N ~
S3:>VdS 03Idn:>:>O
.
.
,__ ___.......,____ _..r-...~~....- ..__ ,___ ,,___
,
I
,
,
i
g~
,;...:0..
g~
coo..
.
ROMA SQUARE PARKING ANALYSIS
Table 2 Saturday October 4, 2003
TIME
TOTAL % OCCUPIED
OCCUPIED
11:00 AM 28 90 31%
11:30 AM 37 90 41%
12 NOON 31 90 34%
12:30 PM 32 90 36%
1:00 PM 31 90 34%
1 :30 PM 34 90 38%
2:00 PM 38 90 42%
2:30 PM 35 90 39%
3:00 PM 36 90 40%
3:30 PM 29 90 32%
4:00 PM 21 90 23%
4:30 PM 22 90 24%
5:00 PM 20 90 22%
5:30 PM 16 90 18%
6:00 PM 27 90 30%
6:30 PM 23 90 26%
7:00 PM 23 90 26%
483 1530
AVERAGE PARKING DURATION
AVERAGE OCCUPANCY
Minutes
<30
30<60
60<90
90<120
120<150
150<180
180<210
210<240
240<270
270<300
300<330
330<360
360<390
390<420
420<450
450<480
>480
total
Vehicles
152
26
18
3
4
1
1
2
o
o
o
1
2
o
1
o
3
214
.
44.09 Minutes
28 32%
. .
----..-.-. ...----........- --..- ---.......- --...--
,
I 82
I r-.:Q.
I
I
I
i g2
i
i iOQ.
I
[
I
i 82
I
! cOQ.
I
I
I
1 g2
!
I .oQ.
t
I
t
i 82
I .oQ.
r
,
I g2
I ;".rQ.
M i
c !
C ! 8:;E
N ; ;".r.Q.
~ I
I
i
a:: ! g2
W
In i-)Q. ~
0
l- e
0 82 LL.
0 i-)Q. 0
~ w
:E
0 g2 i=
a:: (..jQ.
::)l
l-
ce 82
tI)
N (..jQ.
W
a:: g:;E
::) ~Q.
!:2
LL
82
~Q.
0
~2
NQ.
z
NO
.....0
Z
0
c.-:!2
......<(
.....
0
~2
.....<(
.....
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0) co "- co &0 ''It CO) C\I .....
S3:>VdS 031dn:>::>o
;..
.
CAS~~~: 'F'-" '1.....6')0 ~. ,Oo...sS
DATE RECEIVED: \ \) ~ 0 ':!a
RECEIVED BY (staff initi~ls : \~W
ATLAS PAGE #: '2-'
ZONING DISTRICT:
lAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACE T
PROPERTIES: .... r".~m. ~"'-!\ 'eO
NOR~ .'" \t:,,,- @v """
soUTil':'~L lLn, \"",,J' ~,~u ., , ..
WEST:
EAST:
~ Clearwater
u~
~
Planning Department
100 Sou1h Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33~ RIG I
Telephone: 727-562-4 N A L
Fax: 727-562-4866
C SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
tJ SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
a SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
D\ /\ I~' nr:i>\';",vfM. EI\IT
" t....f",; ~"..,. ~.,~ (I ,'. ,'I .\. ~ ~ 'tJ
.. ..' ,--, I ''''.- ,"., r\1A'JER
Ci i Y I..j~- Cd:.l",'\\I'i1'"\ .'
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Inf"dl Redevelopment Project (Revised 11105102)
.....PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT..... use additioaal sheels as necessary
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
Roma Square Inc.
APPLICANT NAME: '
MAILING ADDRESS:
516 Patricia Drive, Dunedin, FL 34698
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
727-734-2200
CELL NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
727-734-3282
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
Roma Square, Inc.
(Mu. Include AlL ownBrs)
AGENT NAME(S):
Robert Pergolizzi, AICP Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.
MAIUNG ADDRESS:
13630 58th Street N, Suite 110, Clearwater, FL 33760
E-MAIL ADDRESS:pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com
PHONE NUMBER:
727-524-1818
CElL NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
727-524-6090
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS of subject site:
2001-2021 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd., & 511 S. Hercules Ave.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
See Attached Legal Descripttion
PARCEL NUMBER:
(if n" ,,~.~ Lu_ -.---- '--'- ~- - '. --...- .H'.'_ ~.. ...--.., '.. .... .....-..-...
13/29/15/57690/000/0010 and 003010060/0080/0090/0110
1.98 acres, 86,060 s.f.
PARCEL SIZE:
(aaes. sausre feeI'l
Retail Sales, Daycare Center . ( 22 , 692 s. f . )
(nll11ber at dwIfJIIlng unlls. hoIal rtIOI1II or 8lPI1e footage of I'IDIlresidllnllal UIl8)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Reduction in front, side setbacks, reduction in required parking.
(Include ell requested cafe devt8IIons: e.g. reducllon In required number of psrlclng 8paces. specISlc use. e1c.)
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
DOES THIS APPLlCA.TION INVOl.VE THE
DEVELOPMENT. OR A PREVIOUSLY APPR
doCuments)
ER OF OEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A. pR SLY APPROVED PLANNED UN IT
(CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO . X . yes, attach a cop~ of the applicable
c. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (SectIon 4-202.A)
C SUBMIT A COpy OF THe TI11.E INSURANCE POLICY, Deeo TO 111e PROPERlY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
pege 6)
D. WRlnEN SUBMrrrAL REQUREMENTS: (SectIon 3-813.A)
Q f"rovIde complete nHIpDI189S to the sJx (8) GENERAL APPLICABLfTY CRITERIA ~ EJcplain ha. eech ernerle Is echleved, In <leIDU:
1. The propoeed develOpment o1'ttMIland wll be In harmony wfth ttw lJC8Ie., bulk, covel1llg8, density end ehaI'aG1er of adjacent properties In
whICh " .. located.
Gulf-to-Bay Boulavard is a commercial HiJdlway containing several older strip shopping centers "ith little landscaping. This
introduction of landscaping along Gulf-to-Bav will upgrade site aooearance. The site complies with FAR & ISR requirements. _
2. The proposed dovelopment will not hklder or dl8coUrage the app...... development and use of adjacent land and buildings or s1gnlflcanUy
bnpalr the vl1lU8 thereOf.
Adjacent buildings include commercial uses. similar to these on-site. No additional building space is proposed, the addition of
landscaped areas will iInprove the value and site appearance.
3. The propoeecl develOpment wll not adYBI88Iy dect 1he he811n or S8fety or pereonI residIng or working In tile nelghborbood of the proposed
use. Only landscaping and parking lot restriping is proposed. ACE Cash Express will expand and remove the adiacent
R& W Pawn Shop within Roma Square.
4. The proposed development Is de8JgnecJ to minimIZe tratnc c:onge8don.
No increase in development entitlements are prooosed.
6. The proposed development is COIIsistent with the community dl8'8Ct8r d the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Gulf-to-Bay is highly commercial "ith strip shopping centers and lack of landscaping. The landscaping will iInproye the
community character and the Gulf-to-Bay corridor.
S. Th4I design of 1he proposed d8Wlopmem mininliz.'8a adver8e efI'8da, including visual, acoustic andotfaclmy and hours of operation Impacts,
on 8<ljacent propemes.
The introduction of landscapingwhere none exist will iInproye the aesthetics. There will be no change to existing hours of
operation or existing buildings. The parking lot will be restriped.
l:I PrDYkle comp1et8 responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE ItFLL REDEVB..OPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA Cas applicable) - Explain
JIm each crltBrIe Ia acNewd In delal:
1. The d8Y8lopment or redevelopment of the parcel praposed for development 18 oJherM8e ImpracllC8l WIthout deviations from the U8e, intensity
and develoPment standards.
The exi~_~g par~g _l~~~ectly ~buts ~~~ulf-to Bay Bouleyard and Hercules Avenue with no landscaping. ProyidiIlg
25 feet would eliminate a complete row of parking on the north and west sides which would be impractical for the current
business.
Page 2 of 7 - FlexIble DeY8lopment ApplIcation - Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
2. lhe development of the parcel p-..&or dev8lopment as a comprehensive InfII Ndevel.nt plOJ8d or residential In1lII project wlN noC
reduCQ the fair malbt value of .~. propertIeS. (hcIude 1118 exI8Ing value fA the e = ttMJ proposed value of the site with the
hnprovements.) The existing market value ofthe site is $1.45 million per Pinellas County Property Appraiser data, the
Expected landscape improvements would increase the value minimally to approximately $1.5 million. The improvements
are an upgrade and would not reduce market value of abutting properties.
3. The lI8es within the comprehensive InftIt rec:krvetopment proJec:t 81'& otherwise permitted In the City 01 Clearwater.
Retail services are permitted in the Commercial (!) zone.
4. The ... or mix of use within the comprehen81ve Inft1I8CI8Y8IOp.-nt proJect_e compatible with adjacent I8nd usee.
Adjacent land uses include commercial development on the east and the north side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard,
Clearwater High School to the west of Hercules Avenue and office zoning to the south. The existing uses on-site
will not be changed.
6. Suitable 8ItM for development Of redevelopment of the 11888 or mix of U888 wilhh the compNhenslve In1'III redevelopment proJect are not
otheIWl8e available In the CIty of Clearwater.
Tlus site is suitable for commercial development. Gulf-to-Bay is fully de\-eloped with few vacant sites. No additional
development activity will occur. The site "ill be upgraded by adding landscaping and restriping the parking lot.
6. The development or the pam proposed for devetopment as a CDmfII'8IteneNe lnftI1 red_topment project wHl upgrade the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development The expansion of ACE Express, Inc. ""ill remove the R&W Pawn Shop thereby
eliminating a "problematic use". The installation ora 7.3' to 10' landscape buffer along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard will
upgrade the property and the immediate vicinity.
'-'--~~ .
7. The deeIgn of the propOlI8CI compntllen8tVe Inflll8dewelopment projed creetl88 . tonn and functiOn tt1a1enllances the communItY charactBr of
the ImmedllllB vicinity ofllle parcel propoeed for deVelopment and the CIty of Clearwater as a whole. No changes to the building
are proposed. The parking lot will be redesigned to add landscaping. buffers and internal islands and spaces will be
restriped. This will enhance the appearance of Gulf-to-Bay Blvd corridor as a "gateway route" for the City of Clearwater.
8. Flexibility In regard to lot wIdII\, raquIf8d 88tb8Cb. helglt and oIf........ parking are juslIIIed by 1he I:Bn8ftls tD communltV charBClBr lIIId the
Immec:l18le VIcInity of the parcel proposed for dewlopment Bnd the elf of Clearwater - a whole. Strict adherence to the code would
make the parking lot modifications impractical and the "status quo" would remain. The flexibility to provide the proposed
landscaping improyements benefits the community character by beautifying Gulf-to-Bay Bouleyard.
9, Adequate oIf-4tl8et parIdng In the 1mmed1a1& vIcInIly acc:orcItIg b 1IIe shared paddng tonnula In Dlvl8lon 14 of ArtIcle 3 will be available to
avoid on-s1reet parldng In the Immediate vicinity of parcel propoRCI for deWIopment.
Frequent observations have proyed the existing parking supply to be adequate for tenants. Strict interpretation of code would
require more spaces than can reasonably fit on this site. On-street parking is provided on Hercules Ayenue.
10. The design of all buildings compIea W1tt11he TourtBt DIIbIct or DowMown DIstrict design guidelines In Division 5 of ArtIcle 3 (88 applicable).
Use separate sheets at neceesary.
Not Applicable,
Plge 3 of 1- Fleldble Development Application - ComprehensiYe InfIII Redevelopment Project- City of CIIl9IWStsr
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
J.. SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (Including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
~I TREE SURVEY (Including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location.
J\::J, Including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
CJ LOCA TION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
J)(
CJ
CJ
CJ
PARKING DEMAND STUDY In conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the
submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shal be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is prOVided);
COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
F.
fSITE PLAN with the following Infotmation (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
:x: All dimensions;
:x: North arrow'
:x: Engineering' bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
~ Location map;
:x: Index sheet referencing Individual sheets included In package;
A.. Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
~ nfa Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
l' :x: All required setbacks;
:x: All existing and proposed pOints of access;
~ All required sight triangles;
-1IliI Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
f trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
~ Location of all public and private easements;
~ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
I :x: Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
J and water lines;
:x: All parking spaces. driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
~ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
~ Location of all solid waste containers. recyciing or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
J Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701};
_ Location of all landscape material;
1--0 Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
~ au. Location of all onsite and offslte storm-water management facilities;
_ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
:x: Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks
Q
():x:
-~
12
]=
J~
J.
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in wr\tlenltabularform:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area. including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses
REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y. X 11) and color rendering if possible
Q FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional Information on site plan:
- nla One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
n- ii7a Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
1/:x: All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborlst", of all trees S" DBH or greater. reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and contlftlon of such trees
f2
O~
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
6:
~:
~x
o~
o~
-
Jx
t>.
J.
GCl
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existIng and proposed structures;
Names of abutting stree1s;
Drainage and retention areas Including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas Including landscaping Islands and curbing;
Proposed and reqUired parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and Immediately adjacent to the site. by species, size and locations, Including drlpllne (as Indicated on
required tree survey);
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, Including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants Inctudlng Instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled end Interior landscape coverage, expressing In both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions Imposed by the Community Development Board);
IrrlgaUon notes
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering If possible)
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications)
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable
"
~~
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMmAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
Cl
c
STORMWATER PLAN InclUding the fOllowing requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines:
Proposed grading Including flnlshed floor elevations of all structures;
All ad/acant streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area Including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculatlons for attllnuatlon and water qually;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval Is required prior to Issuance of City Building Permit), If applicable
COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, If applicable
I.
J Cl
10
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMmAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required In the event the application Includes a development where design standards are In Issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Dlstric1s) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project 01" a Resldentlallnflll Project.
N/A-See Photographs
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings Including height dimensions, colors and materials
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, If
pOSSible) as required
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
O. All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provfde photographs and dimensions (area. height, etc.), Indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
N/A
Cl All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details Including location, size, height. colors. materials and drawing
Cl Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
Cl Reduced slgnage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), If submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Developmenl Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- Cily of Clearwater
.
.
K. TRAFFIc IMPACT STUDY: (SectIon +a2.A 13 and ~.C)
N/A
o Inabl~ .. I'8qIIIred It plrJpaeed ~ment" d8II/8d8.... ~A:_. .... Dl' .... for ~ ~ as adopted t11he Colnprehenstole Plan.
'l'/1I> gellllr'llllCn llhalt be beMcI Oft Ule IIIClI!t 1lMletI...... Dl'.... ...... or T,.~. E~a Trip Gertmll' ~wl. Refer 10 SectIon -HIll'1
C Of1tw CllIn1!lQl\lty DeWloprMlnf Cclde tJr .~I\II ~... ~
L. SlGNAnJRE:
~
I. hi underelgned. ~ IhBI BI Rlpf'eee........ macll In 1Nll
..'=GDo.. aI'8 t'U8 and ~ 110 ..... bNt vi lIlY ImlMIlId.. anct
eutftIwfD ~ nt~ to YIIIa ...a ~ the P/'DP8It:Y
dMcrlbed III .. appllcatloll.
re~ HI ~4>c.Jf} Q c: / A./C .
X;.,~-~
~t1f~~rorl'4lpl'8SO~ d'2 .
\ ..::74-/1' - (</J'?'vC t.!.r /---ReSIPe/i/T
STATI OF FI.OItIDA. eouNT'f Of PlREUAS /) 2 Jr. (:1
8IIlIDm ~ 8ftd .ubscIIbod befo~. ,Ine .. ,(,,) Clay
:;:' j J j~1 b.r'"" AD. :20~ to ..,. IlIll'ld/cr
:- dl - Il.( (I . WIIo Is peraonaIy known
~~-_!.~.
-"-"ltI..
J1UJ(.[/)( / "-t; {{I)f.ltf e,(j
I~~~
fit
by
nas
as
,. - T~---'l"
'. SUSAN'CANTF!$.L
MY COMMISSION # 011140310
EXPIRES: August 22, 2006
~ ThIu NoIary NlIic UndInIIIIIII
Pe,e 6 of 7 - F!eQll8 De~entAppIlcaGon - ColIlp~ ,.. Redctvtlapmenl ~ City or CIltaIw81f;t
~" 'J
,,/ L
~ {'j Q , i) 1,1
~!vgl:c f:OOZ'SZ'deS
.
.
OR'("~";~!
IUli~i\L-
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AG~NT:
Roma Square
Sam Colucci, Presideut
(Names of all property DWI'I11tl)
" That (I Bm/we are) 1he aN.~s) lIIld IICOrd tltle hoId8r(l) of the foIlowlIng dIlIC11b1!l1lJ'OP4!ftY (1dG1MS or (lQIlII1Jl1oCIIiofl):
200 1-2021 Oulf-to-Bay Boulvard and 5 11 S. Hercules A vc:nue.
2. That thII prop<<ly COl'l8tilullla the property for wilton . Nlqtl8et tor a: (deIllllibll fBqlftlsl)
Comprehensive 10011 Redevelopment Project.
Robert Pergolizzi, AICP
:1. That the uMtmigned (halihave) llppointecl ancI (Cloesldo) appoint
Gulf Coast CoMUlting. Inc., and Ed Annstronc. J ohDBon. Pope, et al
It (lIllAhelr) agent(l) to ~ewtJt any pelIIIone or other ~t& m1cenalY D IIfect IUCh plltlkm;
3. lbatthlS: affidlWl nae btln 8XGCUl<<1lD IndUo8 tie CIty of CINtvtatIr, ~ to conelder and act Oft tI'Ie .COIIe d4SCIitl8d \lIOPEIItY;
4, Th!lttne IIllpficlnt acknowIedae. 111m aI U1Pid fIe& (parks and fIICI'llIab,lr.Iflt, etc.) wi! be pait:! PRIOR to lhIl \uuance of 8 bulGing permit,
oertlficate of 0C0IIp8My, or other medlanl.", WhlChevel' OCQR f111t
5. That illil vt!Jls to lI1e prc(lerIV are lWlCl!!lBar)' bJ City ~~es ... oraer to proem this appllcatbn arn:l the owner author'izes City
~pre'enbJl.ivca to viall and phOkliliClh the property desl:r1111lll1/1 Itlll! applIcatIOn:
a That (I/WI l, tile lJ\dllllignecll~, hereby (,8rlfy flat Ule foregoing I$ItU$ end
e;/J/A' ~v/1teE k
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
/}2'~
Befoft 1M 1tlI1B1dnlghMl, tal ~r duly collllllllllolled ~~ IIWI af lie SlID d Farid& on this /) ::.J day of
xp+f/J1bH. ;?()C:~ persanelyappelftKl ",-JUl]J CoklCU whohavlngbeonfhtdul)'sworn
~& aftCl88ytl ilia! halche 1u ' hel5he signed.
{)~
/
Mv Commissiln ExpIres:
t:.~*v:r~?::.. ,SUS aANTReu.
i ~,~: ~i '.' ~ ,t.v, ~~8M!'/tIS~IOO t DO 140310
~I '~;~.."7/:' I*~iRt;:S:A\liMt.U(~
~_' ~.'''':: _._ ~~Ndtlirv1MJiR:~
<,.~..,-._......- ,...;
fr)~
Notary Publk:
S:'lPlWlIIihg ~ Fonn8ll1M1opmt(lfJt~FamlloamJnIIlIIM inIIf ~ 2tlO2.dao
Page 7 of7-Fler.ible ~eloplllCQt Appll~i"e InfiU R.ed~lopmmt Proj~ity of Clearwater
3/8 'd ~Z9g'DN
~~~9l: 6 t:OOZ 'SZ des
.
.
LEGAl DESCRIPTION
LOTS 1 THROUGH 12. MIDWAY SUBDIVISION, AlSO THE STRIP OF LAND
L YlNG \\{ST OF AfOREMENllONED LOTS 1 AND 12 AND EAST OF THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF HERCULES AVENUE BEING BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY
A Yt{STERL Y PROJECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AND
BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY A Yt{STERL Y PROJECTION OF THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID LOT 12. ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13. PAGE 4. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA (SUB.ECT TO ANY MAINTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY
CLAIMED BY LOCAL OR STATE GOVERNMENT).
FLOOD ZONE
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE X. IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE FIRM MAP OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA,
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 125096-0016-0. MAP REVISED AUGUST 19.
1991.
PREPARED FOR: ROUA SQUARE. INC.
ROt.tAN AND ROUAN, PA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
PARKING ANALYSIS
FOR
ROMA SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PREPARED FOR:
ACE CASH EXPRESS
PREPARED BY:
GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC
OCTOBER 2003
PROJECT # 03-027
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
II. METHODOLOGY
III. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
IV. CONCLUSION
I,/~
.. ~tt! .~~
Robert Pergolizzi, . CP
AICP # 9023
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
I.
INTRODUCTION
The Roma Square shopping center is located on the southeast comer of Gulf-to-
Bay Boulevard and Hercules Avenue. The 1.98 acre site contains general retail
sales and services establishments (2001-2021 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard) and a
daycare center (511 S. Hercules Avenue) and is located in the Commercial (C)
zoning district. According to strict interpretation of Section 2-702 of the
Clearwater Community Development Code the site should contain 114 parking
spaces. Presently due to site constraints the site contains 90 parking spaces.
The site is being evaluated as a Comprehensive Jnfill Redevelopment Project
although no change to the building area will occur. Per Section 7-704 of the
Community Development Code a reduction in the required parking is allowed if
the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise
required. The site contains several businesses that do not appear to generate
significant parking demand. This parking analysis was prepared to determine the
availability of parking spaces at the Roma Square site.
II.
METHODOLOGY
Prior to conducting this analysis a methodology was established with City of
Clearwater staff. It was agreed that a parking accumulation study would be
conducted on a Friday and Saturday between 11 AM and 7 PM, and parking
accumulation would be recorded at 30-minute intervals. License tag numbers
were used to identify vehicles that occupied a space for more than one interval.
Information on average parking duration, business hours and number of
employees for each business was also requested.
III.
EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
Existing conditions were established by conducting parking lot observations
between the hours of 11 AM and 7 PM on Friday October 3, 2003 and Saturday
October 4, 2003. Both days were partly sunny (85 degrees) representing typical
October weather and Clearwater High School was in session on Friday. The
Roma Square site contains a total of 90 paved parking spaces of which 30 are
located behind the building in a parking area accessed by Rogers Street. The
majority of the parking is located in two rows adjacent to the building and the
sidewalks along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Hercules Avenue. There are also on-
street parking spaces on Hercules Avenue that were not included in this study.
The Kids Garden daycare center has 2 vans that are parked in a separate lot and
three employee spaces in an unpaved area in front of the building. It operates
weekdays 7 AM - 6 PM with a total of 8 employees and some employees park in
the Roma Square lot. Children are dropped off and picked up by parents.
Businesses located in the shopping center are as follows:
I . .
I
I
Business Address Hours Employees
I
Boa's Card Shop 2021 Gulf M-F 9AM-6PM 2 total
I To Bay Blvd. Sat 9AM-5PM 1 per shift
I Florida Subs 2019 Gulf 24hrs 2 employees
and Gyros to Bay Blvd 7 days per shift
I Advance Phones 2015 Gulf M-F 10AM-6PM 1 employee
To Bay Blvd. Sat 10AM-4PM
I
Coin Laundry 2011 Gulf 24 hours None
I To Bay Blvd. 7 days
I Captains Pizza 2009 Gulf IIAM-3AM 6 total,
To Bay Blvd. 7 days 3 per shift
I R&W Pawn 2007 Gulf M-F 10AM-6PM 2 total,
To Bay Blvd. Sat 12-2:30 PM 1 per shift
I ACE Cash Express 2005 Gulf M-Sat 9AM-8PM 2 total,
To Bay Blvd. Sun 10AM-4PM 1 per shift
I Mr. Formal 2001 Gulf M- W lOAM-6PM 3 total,
To Bay Blvd Thur 10AM-7PM 1 per shift
I Fri IOAM-6PM
Sat 10AM-4PM
I Appliance Service 2001-A Gulf M-F 9AM-5PM 1 employee
To Bay Blvd. Sat 9AM-12Noon
I
I Video Games & 2001-B,C,D Gulf M-F 10AM-7PM 3 total,
Water Store to Bay Blvd. Sat 10AM-5PM 1 per shift
Sun 12Noon-5PM
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IV.
.
.
Friday. October 3. 2003
On Friday parking demand in the shopping center parking lot varied from a low of
19 occupied spaces (21 %) at 11 :00 AM to a peak demand of 44 occupied spaces
(49%) at 1:30 PM, which coincides with dismissal of Clearwater High School.
Interviews with tenants confirm much of the parking lot usage is by students after
school and friends meeting students after school. As such, there were a minimum
of 46 unused parking spaces throughout the afternoon and evening. On the
average the parking lot has 31 occupied spaces (34% occupied), an average of 8
spaces are used by employees, an average of 23 spaces are used by customers and
the average parking duration is 50.2 minutes. Table 1 provides a semi-hourly
tabulation and Figure 1 provides a graph of the semi-hourly parking space
occupancy.
Saturday. October 4. 2003
On Saturday parking demand in the shopping center parking lot varied from a low
of 16 occupied spaces (18%) at 5:30 PM to a peak demand of38 occupied spaces
(42%) at 2:00 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 52 unused parking spaces
throughout the afternoon and evening. On the average the parking lot had 28
occupied spaces (32% occupied), an average of 7 spaces are used by employees,
an average of21 are used by customers and the average parking duration is 44.09
minutes. The difference in parking demand as compared to Friday is attributable
to Clearwater High School being closed on Saturdays. Table 2 provides a semi-
hourly tabulation and Figure 2 provides a graph of the semi-hourly parking space
occupancy.
CONCLUSION
This parking analysis was conducted in accordance with the methodology
established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates the existing
90 parking spaces on-site are sufficient to accommodate parking demand for the
existing businesses on-site. Typically the spaces near the front of the stores are
occupied first by customers for a short duration with high turnover. Spaces in the
rear of the site and directly along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard are primarily used by
employees parking for the entire work shift, although many customers use these
spaces. The 8 spaces along Hercules Avenue are partially used by employees and
occasionally used by Clearwater High School students at 1 :30 PM dismissal on
weekdays.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
ROMA SQUARE PARKING ANALYSIS
Table 1 Friday October 3, 2003
TIME
OCCUPIED
TOTAL % OCCUPIED
11:00AM 19 90 21%
11:30AM 28 90 31%
12 NOON 35 90 39%
12:30 PM 34 90 38%
1 :00 PM 28 90 31%
1:30 PM 44 90 49%
2:00 PM 27 90 30%
2:30 PM 33 90 37%
3:00 PM 33 90 37%
3:30 PM 29 90 32%
4:00 PM 27 90 30%
4:30 PM 29 90 32%
5:00 PM 32 90 36%
5:30 PM 30 90 33%
6:00 PM 33 90 37%
6:30 PM 33 90 37%
7:00 PM 30 90 33%
524 1530
AVERAGE PARKING DURATION
AVERAGE OCCUPANCY
Minutes
< 30
30<60
60<90
90<120
120<150
150<180
180<210
210<240
240<270
270<300
300<330
330<360
360<390
390<420
420<450
450<480
>480
total
Vehicles
168
23
12
2
5
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
o
2
o
5
228
.
50.20 Minutes
31 34%
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
M
o
o
N
M
0::
w
m
o
~
o
o
~
C
o::i
LL
or-
w
0::
::)
C)
LL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
o
0)
o
CD
o
<0
S3:>VdS 03Idn:>:>O
o 0
It) V
o
('t)
8~
,:...:a.
g~
cO a.
8~
<ria.
g~
tija.
8~
tija.
g~
.0;,: a.
8~
.0;,: a.
g~
~a. ~
c
8~ LL
~a. 0
w
::E
g~ i=
Na.
8~
Na.
g~
~a.
8~
~a.
0
C:?~
Na.
..-
Z
NO
"-0
Z
0
C:?~
..-<t:
..-
0
9~
..-<t:
..-
0 0 0
('II .....
o
,....
.
11:00 AM 28 90 31%
11:30 AM 37 90 41%
12 NOON 31 90 34%
12:30 PM 32 90 36%
1 :00 PM 31 90 34%
1 :30 PM 34 90 38%
2:00 PM 38 90 42%
2:30 PM 35 90 39%
3:00 PM 36 90 40%
3:30 PM 29 90 32%
4:00 PM 21 90 23%
4:30 PM 22 90 24%
5:00 PM 20 90 22%
5:30 PM 16 90 18%
6:00 PM 27 90 30%
6:30 PM 23 90 26%
7:00 PM 23 90 26%
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TIME
Minutes
< 30
30<60
60<90
90<120
120<150
150<180
180<210
210<240
240<270
270<300
300<330
330<360
360<390
390<420
420<450
450<480
>480
total
.
ROMA SQUARE PARKING ANALYSIS
Table 2 Saturday October 4, 2003
OCCUPIED
TOTAL % OCCUPIED
483 1530
AVERAGE PARKING DURATION
AVERAGE OCCUPANCY
Vehicles
152
26
18
3
4
1
1
2
o
o
o
1
2
o
1
o
3
214
.
44.09 Minutes
28 32%
I . .
I '~-,'~-",~., .~_...--' "..~.,-,~._,_.,..,-,.".-..,'" .....-- _.~- -~-'~ ........~.'..........-...,'._,....-.._...~-"<>,~ ~....,-~~_.,,"~,,"
g~
,:....:0..
I g~
<Do..
I g~
<Do..
I g~
.00..
I g~
.00..
I ~~
'"io..
C")
0
I 0 g~
N
~~ '"io..
a::
I w g~
Ell Ctjo.. ~
0
l- e
0 g~ u.
I 0 i-jo.. 0
~ w
:E
C g~ i=
a:: No..
I ::))
l-
e( 8~
rn
N No..
I w
a:: g~
::)
C) .;....:0..
I U.
g~
.;....:0..
I 0
~~
No..
..-
I z
NO
"-0
z
I 0
~~
..-<(
..-
0
I C::!~
..-<(
..-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I <>> ClO r-- co LO ~ (\') N ..-
S3~VdS a3ldn~OO
I
f"""'t
L,J
~.
l:"
,', '
<
~
~~
t" .,,~
\'lcM.i/t<"
, L~
~ C<
~
~
Z
~
U<
~~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~~~oo
o ~~ ~
= ~ ~ ~
OO~~~
~~ ~ g
~;1~~
~d 00
-<
~
o
~
~.,-
"',-'~ \";~
! 1
a
I
..
i'
o
-,.,
~Y
c..
00
"
,
I-
W
W
Z:I:
<VI
-J
0.. VI
-J
j:!!C(
-I-
VlW
I- C
w>
>< YJcrc
Ilol :I: < Z
Q ~(I)~c(
Z II:: ~ VI
-~a j:!!
o 00:: 0
Z un.. z
~
Q
. ;...
~'<
, 'I.~
,,:~t
, LlJ
1 ...J
o
u.
:.;0
:C~ ~.....
~ ~--
~~; ts
(\-
~
Z
u
:>
~ -N",
d
z
-< -
8 ~i i;
~ ~
0 '11 aii
..::l g~o lil
r.. ~.g
>"' .~~ a: ......5 ~ 5 ~~
u ;!lS!= ~ I;~i u I .il:::~
Eo-< :: jii :1 ij~~
z o u "'t='~
;:l Z iD! ~ d ~f"'E
'" . ~~
0 c ., ;3 ~ ~~~i
u ~ ~e! ~
00 ftr
-< .5~ UJ - f~
..::l hs <I :;
..::l t;~
liJil ;c o "t
~ O:l1X3" ~ ...~ .-JruJ
Iloo W
0
<
II I I ..; !
!,U UII~ I ill
r ii i !~ t t:;:; I. I
.... !
I I m1r
. : I z . I
I Ii ,I I : 0 ~q
is b" .... r fIt: t t E: il i.
<( , r.! ifW nn I ~I::: : . I I Il.
Eo- ii: .~& .
<(
Q ll.l! .1,,- ! . u Ip
III
I'al fi · I'al
I ,____ ~ Q
Eo- f. I ..... Iii
fii !~ 'i!' .... r F n ...l
<(
il.~!' ~IB I S 00 0: U II t:l "11
I. a aI-- :Ii I'al I..
...l
I'!&" I
. .' II 1111 ~I.
I f I I ili' Uu I ! Dii fi
;Iii nil ~ Iii I' liill I ; ill~
Hd 1..11:. EOOlISI/OI 'OOllW&EWDlZlJ-{O\ UIM'" 011 3NId\:A
/__",,;,1 i, I
I,TNID \llt!
I !
. . .
z
...~ ~
~ i I!MI11II
~ ,~,~~~m"I~1I ii I.i
c:J U.SlIIR~B!_ i~.=lIi
~ .111 I" .. ..
I- 11111 n '
~ ~m,~'~~'!iiil ..foP:
w ...tiIUlilh';'':'
~~} .OGT'9i':
JP. ":,,,,,,...;0 ?1.
. ....: :','j
:l~
, ..t'.1
...[.1-
-- ,jt--~-
~{'
,j
_ Y S11llIlJ!
~
___~-I
EIl:Jt" [
e '
... ZO:tt:~ EOII 51 Ot
OOO=ZO-EO\
"'-
'"
....
~~
Co.
~~
0.-
0"
1li~
~~
::>-
0'''''
"::l
~o.
~
~
. it
~~ ~5
g: ~8ro-;
x.fI)~'"
w~~:~
iJjl!a:~
~~ !;:
!oJ e
~ I
~
I !I-I, I,
~\SV113Nld\:A
Ii. i.. I I!. · I I .
~', Irj. Ii I :!! I :
il dil... .111"
lii'lt I ; J.I'
a I.:J I 'ill i~ II
e~~.~i! Ii illl!ii
zIl9i5i"I' I 11",.
~~I'il'l. I III II 'I'f.~~
~~ -Iral it I I ii".. n-
~. ", HI J:; ..! -I ~': a i ; ~ i
8 ~I: II ~t I!i II 111I'SI
iPII.I pi I ii ,II :Itiia~
IliI. I,i Hi I if I 11;;~i
,gl di' III :.~., 1~llii
~I~!. !lmJd~:L=9j g..!~!.:r&
III
h
11:1
J -
:
f
II
I
-
~ Ir
:l _il
iiZ ii'
!:! .' i
~ j ,.
ri!
tll
'q
Iii
. i
; Hi ~~
a I ilHII~
· : ='Ua i
! II Ilmll
Uhllu~m,
nm l;hH;
III" 1""'"
, '1'I'I",'t
: ! !-! II;>
I"ill!> It+-H
I ' "I"
, i I i ;1
! i T i I!
Iii g
.' .
HI II
III r i
j~~1
~I r<1/
, .
: i/; II il
h
il: 'I'!
'ill. I n
II' ! ill!
:,: 1:;1
~
r;
e~
0'"
z'"
-...
g:::c
Of-<
:0"'
",0
::J<=>
<~
5"'
",r;
~~
o
~
~
s
i
, R
U ,
Z '
- ii
rn~ 8"
tJ~ ~.;
~i~UI~
~z!,!~~
J:~0l",~
3E !~
tj =
0( if
~
..
31
;: i! ~
ga u..
~ I iii!
8! :"$-
::; 1 ~j!~
0.3 _ If..
.~
! fll'l, I.
()}f NId\:A
. .
I ~ I ~~~ .[4&'~
~ I I 1IIIImlulllllmlllll 'II
! 11111.111111111111111111 I' II II I I II I
-,
~ =- ....II...!lI..............
;I .-......................
a.-
0,
~,
>
~
~.
lXI'
~
.
WWJlllW1
CMllIIIDII7 r
".,..~
....IMHIL"..,,~
~ 3'W(fX; VVGI
;1 I&. I
~"d
~ ......
F ......,
Ul .
X I. ""'~'''.,
iii
...........4444.......
.l
i
c,
~:
~.
~:
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I [
.
.
.
.
.
I
~
tD
~:
~.
~
t-
~
~
a::
.......
:z:
a::
F=
.
.,....- r- r r, /'~": ID!
i. , ' .: ' t~~' : ; ';'-, , _ , _ ~-i
~ ;.N~.v 0.,. ..., ,,~ ,__ ___...!l u_
ROMASQUARE
PHOTOS IN LIEU OF BULDING ELEVATIONS ANDSIGNAGE PLAN
i" '\"...
"-~'T
."" of:
_,' ;::::.:'1
,l.e.; ,l i_"
1. North property line looking east along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
2. West property line looking south along Hercules Avenue.
3. Northwest comer of site as viewed from parking lot.
4. West elevation as viewed from Hercules Avenue.
5 . West elevation as viewed from Hercules Avenue.
6. West elevation as viewed from Hercules Avenue.
7. West property line looking south toward daycare center.
8. West property line looking north in front of daycare center.
9. South property line looking east along Rogers Street.
10. Front of daycare center looking north.
11. South elevation of daycare center, looking west along Rogers Street.
12. Daycare center playground as viewed from Rogers Street.
13. Rear parking lot along Rogers Street.
14. Rear parking lot.
15. East property line looking north toward Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
16. East property line looking north toward Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
17. Looking west along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard from east property line.
18. North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
19. Looking west along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard from east property line.
20. North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
21. North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
22. Parking lot along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
23. North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
24. North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
25. North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
26. North elevation as viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
27. North property line looking west toward Hercules Avenue.
28. North property line looking west toward Hercules Avenue.
29. Comer sign at Gulf-to-Bay/Hercules intersection.
30 Roma Square as viewed from north side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.
31. South property line looking west along Rogers Street.
32. East property line looking north.
Signage Calculations
Freestanding signs:
2 pole signs 20 feet by 6 feet = 240 s.f.
Awning Signage: 3 feet by 258 feet = 774 s.f. on north elevation
Awning Signage: 3 feet by 81 feet = 243 feet along west elevation
Note:
Photos taken by Florida Design Consultants. Inc. (FDC) March 2003. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. has verified the
accuracy of these photos and FDC shall have no responsibility regarding these photos.
,.', ,,'
.
i,Ii
,~
.1,
'1 "
il
I
I
",
'~'''~'11''''~''''I1l':~''l!i~~:~"" .'.'__ i
.,n!""lJ~,;~~
ei
-----
_..----
\
~.t-r.
\~
I 'ii
~ . ,:
-----
-l~
;'I~~'-
-iI
_.1::1
. iQI.. 1;-
. I '
.' ....,:1.. 1M._
" -
..._-,.-.,q, ," ,-'
MilWL.. TUXE. D. 0
-..- .......IIIIHTAI.I
,.- ", .---.
AUTHORIZED
SHAVER SERVICE
, ". . r
, - '. IT'".'" .-. . I'..'
baSe viDEo .]!JlI.'N t.
BalLcARdS GamEs
.-11&, ~I._
,lit
,II
,I
il!!
. ::"~..~-,--."......
-,
-4
'~'1
;....,a...,\
~.,
.i'
-:
\~I
\
~
..-..... ,~..-
,e:
II
~1.1..jUII__
,It
,II
.
, I
-
.
,-
.
,~
-If
:1
~
l
lit
I
~',
':
Ii
"~~~:LJ .....~_
'''''"."^<,,,.,,-~
. "" -""'~"1"~1'~if""'~";T:, ,:rj,,,~!:
I. W~, ","1:I"~''''':''~..t':"''','J,',,~, 1,j..JJf~,I~~._~l'1i\\~~,1
~1I~.
. ~;","'
..f ""~\,
~<o~""",,
Jil;',~
.;1.,10;'" '
" ~" -~;-' ::~< ,- ~'i
~k.~~.
."",f;~~~)"'.'
~~~""--" ',.
\ '~".;,:'" ~'''''J "1.;,, -~ :'~'d'f:tr~:.!...".
'." :~':~'~~I!f:~~" ..
~";;~'!':f~,.l': '~
" ,...<'.... ~-,," I ....
.-~;:~.. '
''I.
.".....1'
<' .'/'1
<'"
,A
~--.
"""~'
~~~,
: ~:~>. Jl' ':":1
~_.L.~
" "
'f'"" ,.i,' (.,,1',)
0/ .
"7 ,,..,
:~~!
M 1: X 'i~:
,ei'
~
""""'L"
I~R FORMAL,'". ,"
r,,1:-:: ~'i:~I"~~:fil'
;" P4~N, JEWELRY
q " HO~ DA SVSS&Gr~OS
SHAVERS, v.i~'r~~'"
::W( :0:IJ ,S~Hl:H~1
~
I
,
',\
e
,..,1..1
"
....
'....:.;.'1.
"".
,
MR, FORMAl. ,: ,"
rA'I~:[ '("i:~ltf l-i:[i~~
'll F~WN I JEWElRY
flORID.!. sua! & GHOS
SHAVERS' ~~"...':~{:
c5v~ !I~~ r l~m mOl
,~
,
I
I
I
l-
i
r
l
)1, (1
J~ mr"jJJI~
"'I III .=;I
::c
e!
II
Ii; " ,--,
~l
..
/
;i
-
f
/'!
. '1f
, f~""
",~'y~'" ';
<i!lj
l:i;:,~
rl-/ J /
~l 'r
e
,I
II
t,
~K
S
~
~
-------
e'
/
//
I"
... ""
!ijf]II~;'f'I..J="~"".". r
f~'lj
, 1,1:,/, ,~~~r nl'" .. ,
-
.:,....L.\
1
\.
/
,r~ I
___ ,CWa II I
= .~, '---
~
iiIi
~
~'U~.
le__
IBaimI
"['1 . '.
. ,
..: !
I:~:"
;'1 '
" ,
I',
i,!;~'._. '
t~' · - ;( I
.,,,,!:!II~
--'5)
, f'
.-...., .,1"-
i~
Gulf Coast C.sulting, Inc.
.
Land Development Consulting
ICOT Center
13630 58th Street N, Suite 110
Clearwater, FL 33760
Phone (727) 524-1818
Fax: (727) 524-6090
October 21,2003
Mr. Chip Gerlock, Development Review Manager
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, F1 33756
','" '--","~,T
I '..:' .",...1')'\
c..: ~ ~ l~.
j ,,'
1,.....'J
" ,i,\iLR
Re: Roma Square - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Dear Mr. Gerlock:
Per our discussion attached are the items necessary to process the above referenced
application.
1. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application (13 copies)
2. Legal Description (13 copies)
3. Affidavit to Authorize Agent (13 copies)
4. Preliminary Site Plan (13 copies and one 8-1/2 inch x 11 inch reduction)
5. Landscape Plan (13 copies and one 8-1/2 inch by 11 inch reduction)
6. Boundary Survey (13 copies)
7. Parking Analysis (3 copies)
8. Color Photographs of Buildings and Signage
9. Review Fee check for $1,205
The applicant, Roma Square, Inc. is seeking to add landscaping to the parking lot. Due to
site constraints a 25 foot landscape area cannot be provided. The applicant proposes a
landscape strip along Gulf to Bay Boulevard that ranges between 7.8 feet and 10.6 feet,
whereas no landscape presently exists. In addition, interior landscaping islands are being
added and the parking lot will be resurfaced/restriped. The applicant is also seeking a
waiver to required parking from 114 spaces to 90 parking spaces. A Parking Analysis
which confirms adequate parking exists is enclosed.
The applicant is not requesting any additional development or signage and we believe the
increased landscaping will enhance the appearance along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. The
impervious surface will be reduced as well.
We look forward to the upcoming DRC meeting on December 4,2003. Please contact me
if you have any questions.
.
.
Sin~~, a
~&I/ ~/
Robert Pergolizzi, Alef>
Principal
Cc Sam Colluci, Roma Square, Inc.
Eric Norrington, ACE Cash Express, Inc.
Ed Armstrong, Johnson, Pope, et. al.
Karen Taylor, Phil Graham & Co.
File 03-027
CLWCoverSheet
.
.
, i S --II \Vl-T~'-'.i
,- ! I \ I
- . > " '---'~'''' ".
OCT 2 1 2003
i
, .
-; l
,_------:-:._--::-;.-,,"7J~-~~.~.....{ /.....
- :'!(;. & OL \t:L()r',vt>-- \'vv I
: .IY OF CLENi,'i..l:
~ ,.".-.-"'. ..,.,.';....,;''"'....---...._-_........-''~~.~''-.-.-.-~--
FLD2003-10055
2005 GULF TO BAY BLVD
Date Received: 10/21/2003
ACE AMERICA'S CASH EXPRESS
ZONING DISTRICT: C
LAND USE: CG
ATLAS PAGE: 298B
PAl D
CK.NO. LfG.S,7CL ~
r'I~-rr:: __I (;; __~ I 6.3
--.........;.'-.~:..<..:.~-=..o..~_
OR I Gl NAL
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Brown, Shelby
Monday, October 04, 2004 9:38 AM
Hall, Bob; Wells, Wayne; Tarapani, Cyndi
FLD2003-10055, 2001-2021 Gulf to Bay, Roma Square Shpg Ctr
Good Morning All,
Went by this location on Sunday 10/3/04; photos attached. Ace America's Cash Express has apparently closed this
location and vacated the premises.
Bob, please let me know if there is any further follow-up that you need from me. Cyndi and Wayne, thanks for keeping us
in the loop on this case.
Shelby
~
~
I;J
MVC-701FJPG
MVC-702FJPG
MVC -703F JPG
1
!r,
..
JOHNIN, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BU., LLP
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS A T LAW
Z--.
-..
E. D. ARMSTRONG III
BRUCE H. BOKOR
JOHN R. BONNER, SR.'
GUY M. BURNS
JONATHAN S. COLEMAN
STACY COSTNER
MICHAEL T. CRONIN
ELIZABETH J. DANIELS
BECKY FERRELL-ANTON
COLLEEN M. FLYNN
RINAT HADAS
MARION HALE
SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ
FRANK R. JAKES
TIMOTHY A JOHNSON, JR.
SHARON E. KRICK
ROGER A LARSON
JOHN R. LAWSON, JR'
LEANNE LETIZE
MICHAEL G. LITTLE
MICHAEL C. MARKHAM
ZACHARY D. MESSA
AR. "CHARLIE" NEAL
TROY J. PERDUE
F. WALLACE POPE, JR.
ROBERT V. POTTER, JR.
AUDREY B. RAUCHW A Y
DARRYL R.,RICHARDS
PETER A RlVELLINI
DENNIS G. RUPPEL'
CHARLES A SAMARKOS
PHILIP M. SHASTEEN
JOAN M. VECCHIOLI
STEVEN H. WEINBERGER
JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN
STEVEN A WILLIAMSON
~OF COUNSEL
PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER
FILE NO. 44050.106538
September 21,2004
Ms. Cyndi Tarapani
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, FL 33756
RECE\VED
SEP 2 3 2004
Re: Roma Square Shopping Center
2001-2021 Gulf To Bay Boulevard and
511 South Hercules Avenue
r:p" \!'"":"~~c"rr
':lLANN\NG D,:.-,-;r';'" i.,:
i~' .:-r\{
Dear Cyndi:
As you know, our firm represents Ace Cash Express in connection with the
proposed redevelopment of the Roma Square Shopping Center on Gulf to Bay
Boulevard. As you will recall, Ace Cash Express was operating without benefit of an
occupational license, immediately next door to an existing pawnshop. Ace Cash
Express entered into a contract to take over the pawn shop space, and we appeared in
front of the Community Development Board roughly six (6) months ago seeking relief
from the code requirements. The COB approved our request, with conditions.
Unfortunately, as the project has progressed it is apparent that it is no longer
economically feasible to proceed. I have advised my client that the City will likely
commence enforcement proceedings for the code violation, and my client has assured
me they will vacate the premises by October 1, 2004, without the City having to take
any action.
We appreciate your cooperation throughout this process, and regret that the
project was unable to proceed to fruition.
CLEARWATER OFFICE
91 I CHESTNUT ST.
POST OFFICE BOX 1368
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-1368
TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818
TELECOPIER: (727) 462-0365
TAMPA OFFICE
\00 N. TAMPA ST.
SUITE] 800
POST OFFICE BOX 1] 00
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1100
TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500
TELECOPIER: (813) 223-7\18
.. ~ j. ~.....~
.
.
.. ~
JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP
A TTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
September 21,2004
Page 2
Please feel free to call me if you have questions.
Very truly yours,
JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR,
RUP8& B NS, LLP
EDA/lrc
cc: Mr. Eric Norrington
Mr. Robert Pergolizzi
327856
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Tarapani, Cyndi
Thursday, September 02,20045:17 PM
Brown, Shelby; Wells, Wayne
RE: 2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Ace America Cash Express
I will call Ed Armstrong and remind him of his commitment to ask for extra time- I think I limited it to a very short
time and it is running out...
Cyndi Tarapani
Planning Director
(727)562-4547
cyndi. tarapani@MyClearwater.com
-----Original Message---n
From: Brown, Shelby
Sent: Tuesday, August 31,20044:41 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Tarapani, Cyndi
Subject: RE: 2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Ace America Cash Express
Importance: High
Hi Wayne -
Received a call just now from Walter Orkisz; he runs the biz' at 2007 G2B. He's been speaking w/Bob Hall and
wanted to know the status on Ace America. Bob's on vacation, so I'll give him a call back. Suggestions on what I can
tell him?
thanks,
Shelby
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 20042:18 PM
To: Hall, Bob
Cc: Brown, Shelby; Tarapani, Cyndi
Subject: 2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Ace America Cash Express
Bob -
Cyndi Tarapani has spoken to Ed Armstrong regarding the above address, their Flexible Development approval by
COB and the timing aspect as to compliance with the conditions of approval by the COB. Cyndi is expecting a
letter from Ed Armstrong, to which she will respond with timing for a new or amended request. As soon as I know
something, I will let you know.
Wayne
1
08/17/04 14:51 FAX
,(Ol~orole Idenldicotion I
World wid e
Sign Design
Sign Engineering I
SI Ie Survey
Per mil ACliUisilion
l'ylon51gns
Wnli Signs
Bocklil Awnings
Neon Manufocturing
Ins toll 0 I i 0 11
Chonnel Lellers
Vocuum FOlming
DiQil01 Sign Design
four Color Process
[SIODlishec 1969
.
~ 0011001
~
THOMAS
SIGN & AWNING COMPANY INC.
.
August 17, 2004
Mr. Wayne Wells
Clearwater Planning Department
FAX (727) 562-4865
Dear Mr. Wells:
I will be representing Ace Cash Express at Roma Plaza in E!fhrts to submit
acceptable artwork for the Comprehensive Sign Program. hO'IVever. all art and
design is still forthcoming.
I am not able to provide this submittal until at least 30 days fr<lm today.
In efforts to provide the most accurate version of the new de:: ign that will be
appealing to the community and the tenants, I would ask th:3t you allow this time.
Please let me know if this is acceptable.
:>>-?"
Laurie
Nation .I Account Executive
THOMAS SIGN & AWNING COMPANY, INC.
(727) 572-4900 x 209
4590 nITH AVENUE NORTH · CLEARWATER, FL 33762
------ -
III
1-
'I
,
A
A.C .E
.
.
A.\s.cA'S c.~~-'"lr.",.
ACE Cash E)(prM~, Inc.
1231 Greenway Dr., Ste. 600
Irving. Tex05 75038
(971) 550-5000
www.CJceco~hoxpress.com
August 17, 2004
Wayne Wells
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
Via Fax 727-562-4865
Dear Mr. Wells,
ACE Cash Express is a tenant in the Roma Square Shopping Center on Gulf
to Bay Boulevard. Although it maybe somewhat unusual ACE is attempting
to sustain. our business there by engaging in major refurbishment of the
Roma Square Shopping Center as well as buy-out the adjacent pawn shop-in
order to comply with Clearwater's standards.
We have invested a considerable amount of time and effort into the process.
Our situation has been complicated by our not being the property owner. We
have had to negotiate with the pawn shop owners with no certainty that the
city would approve our plans. I have attached the documentation of that
pending agreement.
We were also were waiting for the FDOT approval and I was uncertain as to
the timing and effect of that approval.
ACE has retained the Thomas Sign Company to submit the sign plan.
Unfortunately, after making an assessment of the property and due the
complexity of the requirements they were not able to respond by today.
e
e
It has been our intention from day one to respond to the city's desire to
improve the Gulf to Bay Blvd. frontage and appearance. Many of the hurdles
were not ones we have faced before. If we can get a few more weeks to
complete the sign process I know we can achieve a result that all parties will
be proud of.
The current situation has been further complicated by the fact that the
property owner has been out of the country and will not return until the first
week in September.
Please give us a chance to make this the best renovation possible.
:it:n
Vice President
Cc: Ed Armstrong
e
e
ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE
TIlis Assi.gnment of Lease ("Assignment") is made as of , 2004 between
Walter Orkisz, Jr. and Robert Orkisz (individually and collectively, "Shareholder") of Pawn and
Jewelery, Inc., a Florida business corporation ("Pawn'), collectively Shareholder and Pawn hereafter the
"Assignor," and ACE Cash Express, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Assignee"). Assignor and Assignee
ate collectivel,y referred to as the "Parties."
Recitals
A. Roma Square Inc., a Florida business corporation ("Landlord"), as lessee or landlord, and
Assignor, as lessee or tenant ("Tenant"), executed a lease dated as of and any and
all attachments or amendments thereto ("Lease"). a copy of which is attached and incorporated by
reference as Exhi.bit A. pursuant to which Landlord leased to Tenant and Tenant leased from Landlord
that certain property described in Exhibit A and as commonly known as 2007 Gulf~To-Bay Boulevard,
Clearwater, Florida 33765 ttl\.e~misev.t for a term of . commencing on
al1d ending on , subject to earlier
termination as provided in the Lease.
B. Assignor desires to aSSign the Lease to Assignee, and Assignee desires to accept the assignment
of the Lease from the Assignor and assume obligations under the Lease, subject to Landlord and Ass'igoee
contemporaneously entering into a new Lease between each other (the "Superceding Lease'l) on such
terms and conditions Assignee, in its sole discretion, deems satisfactory.
Therefore, for good and valuable consideration. the receipt and adequacy of which are
acknowledged, Assignor and Assignee agree as follows:
Section 1
Assignment.
Assignor assigns and transfers to Assignee all right, title, and interest in the Lease and Assignee accepts
from Assignor all right, title, and interest, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Assignment.
Section 2
Assumption of Lease Obligations.
Assignee assumes and agrees to pcrfonn and fulfill all the terms, covenants, conditions, and obligations
required to be performed and fulfilled by Assignor as lessee under the Lease, including the making of all
payments due to or payable on behalf of lessor under the Lease as they become due and payable, but
subject to Assignee's and Lordlord's execution of, and performance under the Superceding Lease.
Section 3
Buy-out Payment,.LY:AAa1i.@..S'fJ~.r~.Jl'Ij~4
Contingent upon the full satisfaction of Assignor's covenants and the express conditions as each are
described in Sections 4 and 5 hereinbelow, Assignee shall fR8ke~itJ"J.n_;tQ .Q.~s.J'_~ the lease
assignment payment to Assignor in the amount of - ("Payment"). Assjgn_~all..h.a~v_O
llilYd1r.q,rJ:.1Jma"eJ;,eint of eayment t.Q....Y~a~eJhe...ete.mises.
.
.
Section 4
Assignor's Covenants.
(a) Assignor covenants that the copy of the Lease attached as Exhibit A is a true and accurate
copy of the Lease as currently in effect and that there exists no other agreement affecting
Assignor's tenancy under the Lease.
(b) Assignor covenants that the Lease is in full effect and no default exists under the Lease, nor
any a,cts or events which, with the passage of time or the giving of notice or both, could become
defaults.
(c) Assignor covenants that, for a period offive years following the date of this Assignment,
Assignor shall refrain from opening, owning, working, participating or otherwise engaging in the
offering of check cashing, deferred presentment otpayday loan services where such business is
located within a five mile radius ohny of Assignee's, Assignee's affiliates, or Assignee's
franchisees' locations.
(d) Assignor ~!;ElfJt5. ....<8I.I.aIUS"'8f.l9 gl:l11FS,l'Itee5 'fa Assigl'le~en~(\.ts.,.~~..Mr.ee_sJJL)lSejt~Jt~sJ
~rts to do and make every undertaking
required by Assignee in order for Assignee to obtain a final non-appealable development order
from the city of Clearwater satisfactory for Assignee to use the leased space(s) for its business.
Section 5
Conditions & Contingencies.
Assignee's obligation to remit Payment to Assignor is expressly conditioned upon (i) Assignee and
Landlord entering into the Superceding Lease, (ii) Assignee obtaining a final, non-appealable develop~
ment order from the city of Clearwater, Florida, (iii) the issuance of an Occupational License from the
City of Clearwater, Florida for the space encompassing 2005 and 2007 Gulf -To-Bay Boulevard,
Clearwater, Florida 33765 and (iv) obtaining any other necessary permits for Assignee to operate its
business from the locations identified in the immediate previous subsection.
Section 6
Further Assurances.
The Parties will promptly execute and deliver to each other such further documents and take such further
action as either may reasonably request in order to more effectively carry out the intent and purpose of
this Assignment.
Section 7
Litigation Costs.
If any litigation between the Parties arises out of this Assignment or concerning the meaning of
interpretation of this Assignment, the losing party shall pay the prevailing party's costs and expenses of
this litigation, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney fees.
Section 8
Indemnification.
Assignor indemnifies Assignee from and against any loss, cost, or expense, including attorney fees and
court costs relating to the failure of Assignor to fulfill Assignor's obligations under the Lease, and
2
.
.
accruing with respect to the period on or prior to the date of this Assignment. Assignee indemnifies
Assignor from and against any loss, cost, or expense, including attorney fees and court costs relating to
the failure of Assignee to fulfill obligations under the Lease, and accruing with respect to the period
subsequent to the date of this Assignment.
Secti on 9
Assignment
Assignor shall not transfer or assign its rights under this Assignment directly or indirectly including
without limit in the cases of merger, acquisition of greater than fifty percent (50%) ownership or control
interest in Assignor, or sale of its assets, without the prior written consent of Assignee. Subject to the
above sentence, this Assignment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties, their hei.rs,
executors, administrators, successors in interest, and assigns. Any purported assignment of this
Agreement by Assignor without the prior written consent of Assignee shall be void.
Section 10
Choice of Law and Forum
This Assignment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the substantial Laws and not the
choice of law rules of the State of Texas. Any action or proceeding to enforce tights under this Assign-
ment must be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in the State of Texas, and, by execution and
delivery of this Assignment, each party (i) a.ccepts, generally and unconditionally, the exclusivejurisdic-
tion of such courts and any related appellate court, and irrevocably agrees to be bound by any judgment
rendered hereby in connection with this Assignment and (ii) irrevocably wa.ives any objection it may now
or hereafter have as to the venue of any such suit, action or proceeding brought in such a court or that
such court is an inconvenient forum. THE PARTIES HEREBY WAIVE TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY
JUDICIAL PROCEEDING TO WHICH THEY ARE BOTH PARTIES TNVOL VING, DIRECTLY OR
INDIRECTLY, ANY MA ITER IN ANY WAY ARISING OUT OF, RELATED TO, OR CONNECTED
WITH THIS ASSIGNMENT.
Section 1 J
Confidentiality
This Assignment, together with the terms and conditions contained herein shall be kept confidential as
among the Parties, except as necessary to effectuate the purpose of this Assignment, or as may be needed
for any legal, judicial, governmental or administrative proceedings or filings. This provision shall survive
the termination of this Assignment.
Section 12
Severabit ity.
Each term of this Assignment is severable. Tfany provision of this Assignment shall be prohibited or
found contrary to or invalid Ut'Ider applicable taw. such provision shall be ineffective only to the extent of
such prohibition or contrariness without invalidating the remainder of such provision or the rem.aining
provisions of this Assignment. Assignor and Assignee agree that if a court, agency, or arbitrator having
jurisdiction determines that any tenn is unenforceable that determination will not affect the other terms of
this Assignment, as the case may be, which other terms will continue to be enforced as iftl1e invalid or
unenforceable terms were omitted.
3
.
.
Section 13
Integration
This Assignment, and any documents referred to herein, supersede all prior understandings, transactions
and communications, whether oral or written, with respect to the matters referred to herein and form the
complete contract between the Assignor and Assignee. No modification, alteration, or amendment of this
Assignment shall be binding upon Assignee unless in writing and signed by Assignee's authorized
representative.
Section 14
Miscellaneous
Assignee agrees to place two !HR9:U-signs (max.imum of ~~ foot by &Ae!>>,..Q foot) in the 2007 Gu If- To-
Ba.y location notifying Pawn's customers of Pawn's new address, if applicable. Assignor wilt pay for and
provide Assignee tft:e511ch sign(s). The Parties agree the Si8O(5) may remain in place for up to 60 days
after Assignor vacates the leased premises.
The Parties have executed this Assignment as of the date first above written.
ASSIGNEE
ACE Cub Express, Inc:.
a Texas corporation
ASSIGNOR
Pawn & Jewelery, Inc.
a Florida corporation
By:
Name: Michael J. Briskey
Title: Senior Vice President/Finance
By:
Name: Walter Orkisz. Jr.
Title: President
By:
Name:
Title:
SHAREHOLDERS
By:
Name:
By:
Name: .
Consent of Landlord
The undersigned, as Landlord under the Lease, cons.ents to this Assignment of the Lease to Assignee,
provided however, that notwithstanding this Assignment and the undersigned's consent to this
Assignment, Assignee and the undersigned shall contemporaneously enter into the Superceding Lease.
LANDLORD:
Roma Square, Inc.
.
By:
Name:
4
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Wells, Wayne
Monday, August 16, 2004 10:01 AM
Brown, Shelby
Hall, Bob; Fierce, Lisa; Tarapani, Cyndi; Gerlock, Chip
RE: FLD2003-10055, Ace America Cash Express, Status
Shelby -
August 17, 2004, is a deadline for certain actions to occur and permits to be applied for, per the Development Order for
FLD2003-10055. Should these actions not occur and the permits not be applied for, per the conditions in the Development
Order, the Flexible Development approval becomes null and void and enforcement action is to begin anew. The agent for
this case is Robert Pergolizzi of Gulf Coast Consulting Inc. I have received from the agent the State permits for the
closure and reconfiguration of driveways on Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Today I have called and left messages for both Mr.
Pergolizzi and Leah Letice of Johnson Pope et al regarding the deadlines and/or lack of action on their part (activities
added to Permit Plan regarding these phone conversations under this case file). Check back with me on Wednesday,
August 18, as to status.
Wayne
m--Original Message--m
From: Brown, Shelby
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 10:38 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Hall, Bob
Subject: FW: FLD2003-100SS, Ace America Cash Express, Status
Wayne, please respond - thanks
nmOriginal Messagemn
From: Brown, Shelby
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 20042:39 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Fox, MaryJo; Hall, Bob
Subject: FLD2003-100SS, Ace America Cash Express, Status
Hi Wayne - any updates on this one?
I know conditions of approval require them to accomplish a variety of things by 8/17/04; if you've any info., pass it on.
thanks,
Shelby
,1"."1,,,
..II~ 'C.J~Jlll1' ~#......
~~.y..~ ....W,x~
-' "',! ,[~
,~;.;,,~.;Jf/if\ ~t
"..,:" ..... C....
':.r:t ~:
~\......,~
':i.~4IJ: .................. ,"',~.~
..~~~~:~4'~~~'. ((.~,l
..........,;A. TEQ. "I.l
::.1~I",~)
· Conditions Associated Wi'
FLD2003-10055
2005 GULF TO BAY BLVD
Legal Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW - For CRT Not Met
Bob Hall spoke with Leah Letice from Johnson Blakely (461-1818) on 11/13/03. He informed her
that this information (filing of this FLD application) is satisfactory for our not issuing citations at this
time. As long as the client does not withdraw the case or fail to bring the property into compliance,
then we will allow the processes to occur. However, once the processes stop toward compliance,
we would need to initiate enforcement again.
Traffic Eng Condition Scott Rice 562-4781
01/07/2004 Landscaping at northeast corner of parking lot must be redesigned to provide 24-foot drive aisle. Not Met
01/16/2004
Applicant must submit narrative justifying driveway configuration along Hercules Avenue. This is Not Met
an existing arrangement that seperates commercial traffic from daycare traffic and provides for
safe delivery of children to the daycare.
Applicant to submit narrative justifying limited backout space for parking stalls south of one story Not Met
commercial building. Landscaping was added in this area to provide a safety buffer between these
parking spaces and the daycare playground.
1/16/04 - S_R Not Met
Provide handicap access walkway a minimum of five feet in width from building to the sidewalk
within the Gulf to Bay Blvd. and Hercules rights-of-way.
01/07/2004
01/07/2004
Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504
01/16/2004 1/16/04 - WW - Still need to revise to include all requests. Not Met
12/4/03 - WW
Revise the application to include all of the requests listed above, including these requests in the
responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria.
01/16/2004 1/16/04 - WW - Need to revise narrative to include additional info. Not Met
12/4/03 - WW
It is strongly suggested to include a narrative as part of the application that explains the primary
reason for the request (problematic use), how Ace America's Cash Express (Ace) will expand its
present square footage to include the existing R & W Pawn Shop tenant space (thereby
eliminating an existing problematic use) and the time frame as to when R & W Pawn Shop will
close and Ace will take over that tenant space (submitting for and obtaining a building permit for
combining the two tenant spaces and completion of the renovation and obtaining a Certificate of
Occupancy). Since Ace has illegally occupied this present location since November 2000 and
there has been longstanding Code enforcement action, it is further suggested that these time
frames be very short. (DRC note: Applicant to provide a timeframe as part of a narrative for
removal of the pawn shop and for submitting for building permits, taking into account buying out
the lease of the pawn shop and length of time to obtain FDOT approval to remove the driveways
on Gulf to Bay Boulevard.)
01/16/2004 1/16/04 - WW - Still needs some work. Not Met
12/4/03 - WW
Provide sign package. Show the location of existing/proposed freestanding signage, including the
existing/proposed setback from the property line(s), and provide the height, area and color of
existing/proposed signage. Include any proposed attached signage. The Comprehensive Sign
Program may be utilized to retain/modify existing signage.
CaseConditons
Print Date: 08/16/2004
Page 1 of 2
.
.
t~ ""..,
....
JJ:!7:T':.~
.''''b~~LOF rk~~
l~><I~~.~#~~
f~~~/~'!fi~ .:.:~
\tC:'~
.......,ffATE~ ~,,1
~QLI"~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LoNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
February 19, 2004
Mr. Robert Pergolizzi, AICP
Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.
13630 58th Street North, Suite 110
Clearwater, FL 33760
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-10055 - 2001-2021 Gulfto Bay Boulevard and 511
South Hercules Avenue
Dear Mr. Pergolizzi:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On February 17, 2004, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application (1) to permit a problematic use in the Commercial District
with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 7.8 feet
(to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback along South Hercules Avenue from
25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions to the front (south) setback along Rogers
Street from 25 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing
pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building)
and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to required parking from five
spaces per 1,000 square feet (114 spaces) to 4.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet (100 spaces), a
deviation to locate a problematic use contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel and a deviation to
locate a problematic use within a building which does not meet all of the current land
development regulations and building regulations, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.L and (2) to permit a reduction to the landscape
buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a
reduction to the landscape buffer along South Hercules Avenue (west) from 10 feet to zero feet
(to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Rogers Street (south) from 10
feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a
reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five feet to one foot (to
existing building) and a reduction to the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to
the building from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the
provisions of Section 3-1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the
application with the following bases and conditions:
BRIAN J, AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, CmlMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BIl.l,JONSOt\, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMEN'[ AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPI.OYER"
.
.
.,
February 19, 2004
Pergolizzi - Page Two
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913 and the Comprehensive Landscape Program per
Section 3-1202.G.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the applicant (Ace America Cash Express) buyout the lease of R & W Pawn and
Jewelry, apply for City building permits for interior renovations and for site improvements,
and obtain required FDOT Access Permits by August 17, 2004. Failure to accomplish all
three items within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the
CDB to be null and void and cause enforcement action to be initiated again. Failure by the
applicant to diligently and timely pursue the issuance of, and completion of, required building
permits for the purpose of issuing an Occupational License for Ace America Cash Express
after completion of those improvements, shall be grounds to deem the Flexible Development
approval null and void and also cause enforcement action to be initiated again.
2. That a Comprehensive Sign Program be submitted by August 17, 2004. The Comprehensive
Sign Program shall include both freestanding and attached signage. Shopping center
freestanding signage shall be reduced to a height acceptable to the Planning Department, have
consistent color, have consistent tenant message panels and individual lettering and have the
site address revised to be read horizontally. The day care center freestanding sign height shall
be acceptable to the Planning Department, be consistent in color as the shopping center
freestanding signage and shall include the site address. Attached shopping center signage
shall have a consistent color of background panels and individual lettering. All necessary
sign permits shall be obtained by October 17, 2004, to effect changes approved under the
Comprehensive Sign Program; and
3. That the double dumpster enclosure be consistent in materials and color as the principal
building.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within the time
frame cited above. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year ofthe
date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The
Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one
year and only within the original period of validity.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity
to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate
the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter
with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
.
.
-l
February 19, 2004
Pergolizzi - Page Three
In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may
be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status
within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an applicationlnoticeof appeal
shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal
period for your case expires on March 2, 2004.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.myc1earwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Cynthia Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
Cc: Mr. E. D. Armstrong
\\MS5c\PDS\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Gulf to Bay 2001-2021 Ace America's Cash Express
(C)\Gulf to Bay 2001-2021 Development Order.doc
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Robert Pergolizzi [pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com]
Friday, February 13, 2004 7:48 AM
Wells, Wayne; Jayne Sears (E-mail)
RE: FLD2003-10055, 2001-2021 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Roma Square
Wayne - In response to your phone call, the conditions are acceptable.
We wish to be placed on the consent agenda.
Robert Pergolizzi, AICP
Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.
13630 58th Street N, Suite 110
Clearwater, Fl 33760
Phone:727~524-1818
Fax: 727-524-6090
Cellphone: 727-644-2695
email: pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:28 PM
To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) i Robert Pergolizzi
Subject: FLD2003-10055, 2001-2021 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Roma Square
Jayne & Robert:
I am attaching a copy of the Staff Report for the above case for the
February 17, 2004, Community Development Board meeting. I am also
sending a
hard copy to you in the mail.
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me via email or
phone.
Wayne
<<Gulf to Bay 2001-2021 Staff Report.doc>>
1
r ", o. .
u...
0
>-
I-
0
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: ~\'!l2:\- ~ ~1l \-. ~
FAX: 'S""2-+ - ~ 0 '70
Phone: S 2-t.:J 'B \ \0
FROM: ~ W\h Phone:~"'2-=~SO+
DATE:~ ~}~ RE:~O~o~ -/~,S'i
~ S ~GJ"-(L
MFSSAGE:_~~~ ~T~ \~e- ~
VV'L -.: '.
. w~. Wt.\\~@ "'^j~'t.r/I..t"w~""tl'". ~
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 3
RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME 02/04/2004 15:29
~~AME PLAN
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
DATE, TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
02/04 15:27
95245090
00:01:22
03
OK
STANDARD
ECM
J
,"
.
.
ROMA SQUARE COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION
NARRATIVE SUMMARY
1. The request is for flexible development approval to permit a problematic use (check
cashing operation) in the Commercial district with reductions to setbacks, parking
requirements, reductions of landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Hercules
A venue, and Rogers Street, and establishment of a comprehensive landscape program,
and comprehensive sign program.
2. The applicant Roma Square, Inc. and one of its tenants (ACE Cash Express) are
expending substantial funds to upgrade the site which is substandard according to the
current code. The improvements include providing substantial landscaping along Gulf to
Bay Boulevard, reducing the impervious surface, providing interior landscaping where
none presently exists, resurfacing/restriping the existing parking lot, modifying and
providing for access by eliminating two driveways to Gulf to Bay Boulevard.
3. The "redevelopment" does not include adding any floor area to the existing building. It
contemplates the removal. of the R& W Pawn Shop (an existing problematic use) to
accommodate the expansion of the existing Ace Cash Express store. ACE Cash Express
has entered into an agreement with R& W Pawn to ''buyout'' their lease and expand,
thereby eliminating an existing problematic use on the site. As discussed at DRC, we
propose the timeframe for obtaining FDOT Access Permits, buying out the lease and
applying for building permits for interior renovations be 6 months after CDB approval.
4. Interior landscaping will be introduced to the front of the site at the request of DRC.
Interior landscaped islands will break: up th " a of asphalt" that presently exists and the
parking area will be retrofitted to include 1 s dard spaces, including 4 handicapped
accessible spaces (114 required by code). A p king study was completed to demonstrate
this will be adequate to accommodate parking emands.
5. Sidewalk will be added along Rogers Stree where none exists.
I
6. A central dumpster will be utilized and en
7. Existing signage is proposed to remain. odifications of the freestanding sign panels
will be introduced to provide a more comm n color scheme except where corporate color
schemes are utilized. Addresses on the frees ding signs will be changed from vertical to
horizontal. \
\ ck~
'" }Oa
h
.. . ...
.
.
SUMMARY
The proposed modifications will significantly improve the appearance of the site and the
view along Gulf to bay Boulevard. The approval of this project will eliminate a
problematic use (pawn shop) along Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Flexibility is necessary to
accomplish the goals of the project and the end result will be a significant improvement
over existing conditions.
~
Gulf Coast clsulting., Inc.
.
Land Development Consulting
ICOT Center
13630 58th Street N, Suite 110
Clearwater, FL 33760
Phone: (727) 524-1818
Fax: (727) 524-6090
fO) ~ C~ r~ rl
uOor:;;~:o~
rn
January 23, 2003
h_AI~Nf~jG S DE\:i::LOPMr:NT S\'Cti
ClfYOF CtEAHWAIER
Mr. Chip Gerlock, Development Review Manager
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, Fl 33756
Re: Roma Square - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Dear Mr. Gerlock:
Attached are the items necessary to process the above referenced application.
1. Preliminary Site Plan (15 copies and one 8-1/2 inch x 11 inch reduction)
2. Landscape Plan (15 copies and one 8-1/2 inch by 11 inch reduction)
The enclosed plans reflect additional revisions in response to verbal comments from
Wayne Wells in regard to the parking lot configuration. Specifically, the parking area
will have 100 spaces; 4 of which will be handicapped. This project will include the
replacement of a current problematic use which is a pawn shop by an in compliance
check cashing use.
We anticipate that this project will be presented at the Community Development Board
meeting on February 17,2003. Please contact me if you have any questions.
S:UJ2
Robert pergOliZZ~
Principal
Cc Sam Colluci, Roma Square, Inc. w/encl.
Eric Norrington, ACE Cash Express, Inc. w/encl.
Ed Armstrong, Johnson, Pope, et. al. w/encl.
Karen Taylor, Phil Graham & Co.
File 03-027
.
.
,
'.
\I
CITY OF CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (127) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
January 16, 2004
Mr. Robert Pergolizzi, AICP
Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.
13630 58th Street North, Suite 11 0
Clearwater, FL 33760
Re: Community Development Board Meeting (FLD2003-10055)
Dear Mr. Pergolizzi:
The Flexible Development application (Case No. FLD2003-10055) (1) to permit a problematic
use in the Commercial District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay
Boulevard from 25 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback
along Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions to the front
(south) setback along Rogers Street from 25 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 25
feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to one
foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to
required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (114 spaces) to 4.4 spaces per 1,000
square feet (100 spaces), a deviation to locate a problematic use contiguous to a residentially
zoned parcel and a deviation to locate a problematic use within a building which does not meet
all of the current land development regulations and building regulations, as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.L and (2) to permit a
reduction to the landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 feet to 7.8 feet (to
existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Hercules Avenue (west) from 10
feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Rogers Street
(south) from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing
pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five feet to one
foot (to existing building) and a reduction to the width of the required foundation landscaping
adjacent to the building from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program,
under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G for property located at 2001-2021 Gulf to Bay
Boulevard and 511 South Hercules Avenue has been scheduled to be reviewed by the
Community Development Board on February 17, 2004.
The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall
at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
BRlAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYf HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBllARD, COMMISSIONER (1) BIl.LJONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
t
.
.
. ,
January 16, 2004
Pergolizzi - Page 2
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
~NL M. ~
.w ~~ M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
IIMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslUp for the next CDBIGulfto Bay 100/-101/ Ace America's Cash Express (C)IGulfto Bay 100/-101/
CDB Lelter.doc
~
Gulf Coast CISulting, Inc.
.
Land Development Consulting
ICOT Center
13630 58th Street N., Suite 110
Clearwater, FL 33760 .
Phone: (727) 524-1818
Fax: (727) 524-6090
January 7,2003
rn cIS 'f\l Is I] \'11 r<; : i
D.... [, ll'l I'] . \i [".' r., I.. I.:..
:, L ! i
il ~ I 2 2004 ! tJ I
_._._~ I
CITY OFClEM,WI,! FR
PURl.IC WORKS A[)~1!;':ISTR,~.~).fj__
Mr. Scott Rice, P .E.
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, FI 33756
Re: Roma Square - Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment
FLD2003-10055, 2005 Gulf to Bay Blvd.
Dear Mr. Rice:
In regard to our discussion this date in regard to the above referenced project, we make
the following comments.
1. The parking behind the one-story retail building will primarily be used by
employees. It is desired to provide a small landscape buffer between this parking
area and the day care center playground thus leading to the lay-out as submitted.
2. The entrances to the day care are existing. In order to provide safe ingress/egress
for pre-school age children to exit vehicles in front of the day care center, it is
important for the entrances to remain as shown. The throat depth of the existing
entrance to Rogers Street is not deep enough for this entrance to be the main
entrance to this day care center. Safety is imperative when dealing with this age
child.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you haveanyque~tions Of need any additional
information concerning this project.
#~
Richrd D. Harris, P. E.
Principal
Cc
Ed Armstrong, Johnson, Pope, et. al.
File 03-027
~
Gulf Coast Clsulting, Inc.
· RECE\VED
JAN - i!, 2004
PLANN\NG DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWAtER.
Land Development Consulting
ICOT Center
13630 58th Street N, Suite 110
Clearwater, FL 33760
Phone (727) 524-1818
Fax: (727) 524-6090
January 2,200;1-
Mr. Chip Gerlock, Development Review Manager
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, Fl 33756
Re: Roma Square - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Dear Mr. Gerlock:
Attached are the items necessary to process the above referenced application.
1. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application (15 copies)
2. Legal Description (15 copies)
3. Affidavit to Authorize Agent (15 copies)
4. Preliminary Site Plan (15 copies and one 8-112 inch x 11 inch reduction)
5. Landscape Plan (15 copies and one 8-112 inch by 11 inch reduction)
6. Boundary Survey (15 copies)
7. Parking Analysis (3 copies)
8. Color Photographs of Buildings and Signage( 1 copy)
9. Lease Buy-out Agreement (15 copies)
The applicant, Roma Square, Inc. is seeking to add landscaping to the parking lot. Due to
site constraints a 25 foot landscape area cannot be provided. The applicant proposes a
landscape strip along Gulf to Bay Boulevard that ranges between 7.8 feet and 10.6 feet,
whereas no landscape presently exists. In addition, interior landscaping islands are being
added and the parking lot will be resurfacedlrestriped. The applicant is also seeking a
waiver to required parking from 114 spaces to 104 parking spaces. A Parking Analysis
which confirms adequate parking exists is enclosed.
The applicant is not requesting any additional development or signage and we believe the
increased landscaping will enhance the appearance along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. The
impervious surface will be reduced as well.
We anticipate that this project will be presented at the Community Development Board
meeting on February 17,2003. Please contact me if you have any questions.
.
Cc Sam Colluci, Roma Square, Inc. w/encl.
Eric Norrington, ACE Cash Express, Inc. w/encl.
Ed Armstrong, Johnson, Pope, et. al. w/encl.
Karen Taylor, Phil Graham & Co.
File 03-027
.
'"='"
LL
.
o
>-
>-
u
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO:_~ Sw-':\-- ~ ~ ~ \' \ 2.- -z..\
FAX: "S' 2.-+" ta 090
Phone: S-l..4- - ,~\ ~
FROM: \,.j\~ W~\~
DA TE:~ ..l) 1 ~ \) '3 RE:
lVIESSAGE:
Phone: 5 \., 2-~:)Q 4::
PL>> ~~ 3 - lOUrS
2-<lor 4 "W -K> ~J 11\.. ~.
V~E\ ~(LC u-~
r- 1-1 J \) 3
f
T ",,"-A.. o.\~. "'-.....~L~ \-\...u. \,,~ . -\.. r
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 5'
ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
--';;c
TIME 11/20/2003 13:08
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275624575
TEL 7275524567
DATE, TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
11/20 13: 05
95246090
00:03:30
05
OK
STANDARD
ECM
10:10 a.m.
. .
Case: FLD2003-10055 -'-2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
Owner/Applicant: Roma Square, Inc.
Representative: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. (13630 58th Street North, Suite 110,
Clearwater, FL 33760; phone: 727-524-1818; fax: 727-524-6090; email:
pergo(G),gulfcoastconsultinginc .com).
Location: 1.98 acres located on the south side of Gulf to Bay Boulevard at the intersection with Hercules
Avenue.
Atlas Page: 298B.
Zoning: C, Commercial District.
Request: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in the Commercial District with a
reduction of the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing
pavement), a reduction of the front (west) setback along Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet (to
existing pavement), reductions of the front (south setback along Rogers Street from 25 feet to one foot (to
existing building) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback
from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a
deviation to locate contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel, a deviation to locate within a building which
does not meet all of the current land development regulations and building regulations and a reduction of
required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (114 spaces) to 3.97 spaces per 1,000 square feet
(90 spaces), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.L and
(2) to permit a reduction of the landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 feet to 7.8
feet(to existing pavement), a reduction of the landscape buffer along Hercules Avenue (west) from 10 feet
to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction of the landscape buffer along Rogers Street (south) from 10
feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction of
the landscape buffer along the east property line from five feet to one foot (to existing building) and from
five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions
of Section 3-1202.G.
Proposed Use: Problematic use (check cashing).
Neighborhood Association:
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson, Rick Albee and Wayne Wells.
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No comment since no change to building coverage.
2. Stormwater:
a) No comments.
3. Traffic En2ineerin2:
a) Remove first two driveways immediately east of the SR60 and Hercules Avenue intersection to
improve Level of Service along Gulf To Bay Blvd. and provide more connection spacing between
a driveway and traffic signal (min. 125'.) See Section 3-102 D. Community Development Code.
b) Provide more parking utilizing the added space gained from the removal of the two driveways.
c) Three consecutive driveways along Hercules A venue results in safety concerns for the many
conflict points. This portion of the parking area needs to be redesigned to minimize conflict points.
This could provide more parking spaces that comply with the parking stall standards.
d) All Handicapped stalls must comply with the current City standards i.e. there must not be any
obstacles in the 5'x19' handicapped aisle such as ramps. Handicapped aisle must be flush with
sidewalk and ramp must start at the wings of the sidewalk as shown on the City details.
e) All removed driveways must match existing curbs and sidewalks.
f) A minimum of four handicap parking spaces must be provided for the current number of parking
spaces.
g) Compact parking not acceptable for required parking calculations.
h) Show 20' x20' sight visibility triangles for driveway on Rogers Street.
i) Show loading zone exclusive of parking spaces and drive aisles.
j) All of the above must be submitted prior to CDB.
k) Prior to building permit, submit a FDOT permit for construction along State right of way and
adhere to their conditions.
4. General En2ineerin2:
a) No comments.
Page 1 of 4
5.
.
.
Plannine::
a) Revise the application to include all of the requests listed above, including these requests in the
responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria.
b) It is strongly suggested to include a narrative as part of the application that explains the primary
reason for the request (problematic use), how Ace America's Cash Express (Ace) will expand its
present square footage to include the existing R & W Pawn Shop tenant space (thereby eliminating
an existing problematic use) and the time frame as to when R & W Pawn Shop will close and Ace
will take over that tenant space (submitting for and obtaining a building permit for combining the
two tenant spaces and completion of the renovation and obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy).
Since Ace has illegally occupied this present location since November 2000 and there has been
longstanding Code enforcement action, it is further suggested that these time frames be very short.
c) Revise the application to include all Parcel Numbers for the property:
13/29/15/57690/000/0010 13/29/15/57690/000/0030 13/29/15/57690/000/0060
13/29/15/57690/000/0080 13/29/15/57690/000/0090 13/29/15/57690/000/0110
d) To improve the level of service of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, improve vehicular safety and increase
provided parking, remove two of the existing driveways on Gulf to Bay Boulevard (suggested to
retain the easternmost driveway).
e) Provide the width of all proposed landscape islands. Section 3-1202.E.l provides that interior
landscape islands must be a minimum of 150 square feet in area and eight feet wide inside
curbing.
f) To improve parking lot design and make the landscape plan more cohesive, it is recommended to
eliminate the existing raised planter adjacent to Gulf to Bay Boulevard (close to Hercules
Avenue).
g) The existing main shopping center driveway on Hercules Avenue is not dimensioned, but scales at
approximately 39 feet wide. Recommend reducing this driveway down closer to or at 24 feet wide
to gain parking and/or interior landscaping, while not compromising traffic flow.
h) Either pave the existing unpaved employee parking for the daycare to City Code or remove
parking from the area shown adjacent to Hercules Avenue. Provide protection to the landscape
area within this area, acceptable to the Planning Department, and to the landscape area at the
northeast comer of Hercules Avenue and Rogers Street.
i) Provide handicap parking access to the daycare center (may be via a sidewalk from the adjacent
handicap parking space and walk aisle directly north of the daycare).
j) Based on the photographs and survey submitted, there is an inconsistency between the two as it
relates to the rear parking area in the southeast portion of the site. The survey notes the majority
of this area to be gravel (survey dated June 4, 1998, and revised on September 18, 2003), yet the
photographs indicate this area to be paved. Advise/revise survey.
k) Dimension the width of the driveway on Rogers Street.
I) Install sidewalks along Rogers Street for the street frontages where no sidewalk exists today.
Remove all excess pavement from the right-of-way.
m) There is no improvement proposed to the parking area in the southeast portion of the site. It is
recommended to revise this parking area to provide landscape areas in accordance with Code
provisions (or ask for reductions where necessary), including improvements to traffic flow,
number of parking spaces, landscape buffers, interior landscaping, loading space and dumpster(s)
enclosure(s).
n) Based on the photographs submitted, remove the existing chain link fencing within the front
setback along Rogers Street for the parking area in the southeast portion of the site. With
landscape buffer improvement along the east property line, it may also be possible to remove the
existing chain link fence along the east property line.
0) It is unclear the reason for the diagonally striped areas within the parking area in the southeast
portion of the site. Advise/revise.
p) For 90 provided parking spaces, four handicap parking spaces are required to be provided. Proper
handicap ramp access is also required to be installed.
q) Section 3-1202.E.l requires interior landscape islands to be installed so that in most cases there
are no more than 10 spaces in a row (although there is flexibility with staff to allow up to 15
spaces in a row). There are 27 parking spaces in the row adjacent to the north side of the shopping
center building. Break up the parking with a landscape island (minimum eight feet wide inside
curbing).
r) Provide sign package. Show the location of existing/proposed freestanding signage, including the
existing/proposed setback from the property line(s), and provide the height, area and color of
existing/proposed signage. Include any proposed attached signage. The Comprehensive Sign
Program may be utilized to retain/modify existing signage.
Page 2 of4
s) Section 6-104tr nonconforming signs states that "In the ev! building permit is required for
the redevelopment of a principal use/structure, or a principal use/structure is vacant fora period of
180 days, signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance by
obtaining a level one approval in accordance with the provisions of Article 4, Division 3." A
building permit will be required for interior remodeling to combine the two tenant spaces for R &
W Pawn and Ace America Cash Express. Additionally, a building permit will be required for the
proposed site improvements. In relation to the above comment "g" regarding signage, what
changes are proposed to existing freestanding and attached signage? At a minimum, the addresses
on the freestanding signs should be reoriented to read horizontally rather than vertically; those
panels on freestanding signs that are not a white background with red lettering should be changed;
and those attached tenant signs that are not on a white background with individual lettering should
be changed.
t) Show the visibility triangles at all driveways, including those for the daycare on Hercules Avenue
and the driveway on Rogers Street, and at the intersections of Gulf to Bay Boulevard/Hercules
A venue and Hercules A venueIRogers Street. Revise the visibility triangles on the landscape plan
to Code size of20' x 20' and to Code locations.
u) Address/show the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. Coordinate with landscaping. Outdoor
lighting is required to meet the requirements of Sections 3-1301 - 1302.
v) Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required screening.
If located on the roof, note such.
w) Provide traffic flow arrows and signage (including "do not enter" signage) to indicate one-way
traffic flow for the daycare.
x) Show the number, length and width of the daycare van parking space(s), as well as any other
parallel parking within this area of the site. These spaces should be included in the parking count.
y) Owner will need to complete and record a Unity of Title document prior to issuance of any
building permits.
z) Provide a tree survey (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by
species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be
removed) (please design around the existing trees). Technically, a tree inventory, prepared a
certified arborist of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition
of such trees is required to be submitted based on the lot area (contact Rick Albee at 562-4741).
aa) Revise site data table on Sheet 1 for "side (south)" to "front (south)" and to indicate a 25-foot
setback is required.
bb) Indicate on the site plan (or other appropriate plan) all required parking lot interior landscaping
crosshatched or shaded, including the area of each interior area being calculated.
cc) Revise the landscape plan to indicate the amount of interior landscape area is being provided
(revise "open space provided" to "interior landscape area provided", se Comment #27 above). A
minimum of 10 percent of the paved vehicular use area is required.
dd) Coordinate the landscape plan and the site plan as to pavement versus landscape area where the
five sabal palms are proposed at the rear parking area near the "parking/service area."
ee) Indicate the existing/proposed use of the second floor of the "daycare" building.
ff) When resubmitting the application package for the Community Development Board (CDB),
please include a reduced landscape plan to scale (8 Yz X 11), in color, for CDB presentation
purposes.
gg) Provide wheel stops and concrete curbing adjacent to landscape areas in the parking area in the
southeast portion of the site.
hh) Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions,
soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures.
ii) Submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program application, addressing all criteria, based on the
requests outlined at the beginning of this letter (or as modified with revised plans).
jj) Is there any outdoor seating for Captain's Pizza?
kk) Code requires foundation landscaping of a minimum width of five feet. Any ability to provide?
May need to include in the request and include as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program
application.
11) Revise Sheet L-l to indicate Rogers Street on the south (not Turner Street).
mm) Indicate through a narrative the proposed building improvements.
nn) Landscaping should be added outside the existing chain link fence along Rogers Street adjacent to
the daycare playground.
00) Compact parking is not provided by Code. Revise to Code parking space dimensions (9' x 19').
6. Solid Waste:
a) How is solid Waste handled? All Dumpsters must be enclosed.
Page 3 of4
7. Land Resources:
a) Show the Brazilian Pepper to be removed. Show on plans prior to building permit.
b) Show the Red Maple tree to be removed, this tree is declining and will not improve. Show on
plans prior to building permit.
.
.
-'
8. Fire:
a) No comments.
9. Environmental:
a) No comments.
10. Communitv Response:
a) Occupational License application for this use was reviewed by Zoning, which requires CDB
approval prior to issuance. Letter stating such was sent to the business 12/14/00. The Occupational
License application has been in the CRT / OCL hold folder since 12/14/00.
b) Bob Hall spoke with Leah Letice from Johnson Blakely (461-1818) on 11/13/03. He informed her
that this information (filing of this FLD application) is satisfactory for our not issuing citations at
this time. As long as the client does not withdraw the case or fail to bring the property into
compliance, then we will allow the processes to occur. However, once the processes stop toward
compliance, we would need to initiate enforcement again.
11. Landscapinl!:
a) Having reviewed the proposed plan with traffic engineering, we have several suggestions that will
improve traffic flow and the landscape for the site, while maintaining all the parking, and in fact
adding 5 spaces total per Code for a total of 92 full size spaces. See traffic (Ben Elbo) for plan.
b) Irrigation must meet the City Code per Section 3-1203.C., adjust plans to show 100% coverage,
rain sensor, automatic timer, etc.
c) Per Section 3-1202.E.l Code requires a minimum of 10% interior green space of gross vehicular
use area or 12% of gross vehicular use area if parking spaces area greater than 110% of the
required parking. Interior islands shall be designed so that in most cases no more than 10 parking
spaces are provided in a row. Interior islands shall be a minimum of 150 sq. ft., and be 8' of green
space from back of curb to back of curb.
d) Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by
the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any
landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have
a minimum height of six inches above grade.
e) Per Section 3-1202.B.1. Code requires trees to be 10' in height and 2 1/2" cal. at planting,
ornamental trees can be 8' in height and 2" cal., and palms must be 10' clear and straight trunk at
planting. Make changes in Legend and submit revised page for review.
f) Please call Sherrie Nicodemus @ 727-562-4582 to schedule to meet with planner, traffic, and I to
review the suggested parking and landscape plan.
NOTES:
In order to be placed on the January 20, 2004, CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans and
application material addressing all above departments' comments by Thursday, December 11, 2003, no later than
noon. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Submissions not appropriately organized shall be
deemed to be insufficient and returned to the applicant.
\IMS5c1PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXiPending cases I Up for the next DRClGulfto Bay 2005 Ace America's Cash Express {C}IGulfto
Bay 2005 DRAFT DRC comments. doc
Page 4 of 4
,
.
.
~~~
~~~
'.~t~~:':'
r:: -- ,.-...;.~
~~ - ~..
...~~ -- .' ~i
~",~~':~"~~~)'
"+~3Jl~t1'"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LoNG RANGE PIANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvrEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
November 12, 2003
Mr. Robert Pergolizzi, AICP
Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.
13630 58th Street North, Suite 110
Clearwater, FL 33760
Re: Flexible Development approval to permit a problematic use in the Commercial District
with a reduction of the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to
7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction of the front (west) setback along Hercules
Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions of the front (south
setback along Rogers Street from 25 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 25
feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet
to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a
deviation to locate contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel, a deviation to locate within
a building which does not meet all of the current land development regulations and
building regulations and a reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000
square feet (114 spaces) to 3.97 spaces per 1,000 square feet (90 spaces), as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.L
and to permit a reduction of the landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north)
from 15 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction of the landscape buffer along
Hercules Avenue (west) from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction of
the landscape buffer along Rogers Street (south) from 10 feet to one foot (to existing
building) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction of the
landscape buffer along the east property line from five feet to one foot (to existing
building) and from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive
Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G (Case FLD2003-10055,
2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard).
Dear Mr. Pergolizzi:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval as
referenced above for the property including 2001 - 2021 Gulf to Bay Boulevard and 511
Hercules Avenue. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined
that the application is generally complete. While not part of a completeness review, I have
provided preliminary information about the sufficiency of the application. The Development
Review Committee (DRC), prior to or at the DRC meeting, will provide more comments.
BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILl. JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
e
November 12,2003
Pergolizzi - Page 2
General Comments related to the sufficiency of the application:
1. Revise the application to include all of the requests listed above, including these requests
in the responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project criteria.
2. It is strongly suggested to include a narrative as part of the application that explains the
primary reason for the request (problematic use), how Ace America's Cash Express
(Ace) will expand its present square footage to include the existing R & W Pawn Shop
tenant space (thereby eliminating an existing problematic use) and the time frame as to
when R & W Pawn Shop will close and Ace will take over that tenant space (submitting
for and obtaining a building permit for combining the two tenant spaces and completion
of the renovation and obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy). Since Ace has illegally
occupied this present location since November 2000 and there has been longstanding
Code enforcement action, it is further suggested that these time frames be very short.
3. Revise the application to include all Parcel Numbers for the property:
13/29/15/57690/000/0010 13/29/15/57690/000/0030 13/29/15/57690/000/0060
13/29/15/57690/000/0080 13/29/15/57690/000/0090 13/29/15/57690/000/0110
4. To improve the level of service of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, improve vehicular safety and
increase provided parking, remove two of the existing driveways on Gulf to Bay
Boulevard (suggested to retain the easternmost driveway).
5. Provide the width of all proposed landscape islands. Section 3-1202.E.l provides that
interior landscape islands must be a minimum of 150 square feet in area and eight feet
wide inside curbing.
6. To improve parking lot design and make the landscape plan more cohesive, it is
recommended to eliminate the existing raised planter adjacent to Gulf to Bay Boulevard
(close to Hercules Avenue).
7. The existing main shopping center driveway on Hercules Avenue is not dimensioned, but
scales at approximately 39 feet wide. Recommend reducing this driveway down closer to
or at 24 feet wide to gain parking and/or interior landscaping, while not compromising
traffic flow.
8. Either pave the existing unpaved employee parking for the daycare to City Code or
remove parking from the area shown adjacent to Hercules Avenue. Provide protection to
the landscape area within this area, acceptable to the Planning Department, and to the
landscape area at the northeast comer of Hercules Avenue and Rogers Street.
9. Provide handicap parking access to the daycare center (may be via a sidewalk from the
adjacent handicap parking space and walk aisle directly north of the daycare).
10. Based on the photographs and survey submitted, there is an inconsistency between the
two as it relates to the rear parking area in the southeast portion of the site. The survey
notes the majority of this area to be gravel (survey dated June 4, 1998, and revised on
September 18, 2003), yet the photographs indicate this area to be paved. Advise/revise
survey.
11. Dimension the width of the driveway on Rogers Street.
.
.
November 12,2003
Pergolizzi - Page 3
12. Install sidewalks along Hercules Avenue and Rogers Street for the street frontages where
no sidewalk exists today. Remove all excess pavement from the rights-of-way.
13. There is no improvement proposed to the parking area in the southeast portion ofthe site.
It is recommended to revise this parking area to provide landscape areas in accordance
with Code provisions (or ask for reductions where necessary), including improvements to
traffic flow, number of parking spaces, landscape buffers, interior landscaping, loading
space and dumpster(s) enclosure(s).
14. Based on the photographs submitted, remove the existing chain link fencing within the
front setback along Rogers Street for the parking area in the southeast portion of the site.
With landscape buffer improvement along the east property line, it may also be possible
to remove the existing chain link fence along the east property line.
15. It is unclear the reason for the diagonally striped areas within the parking area in the
southeast portion of the site. Advise/revise.
16. For 90 provided parking spaces, four handicap parking spaces are required to be
provided. Proper handicap ramp access is also required to be installed.
17. Section 3-1202.E.l requires interior landscape islands to be installed so that in most cases
there are no more than 10 spaces in a row (although there is flexibility with staff to allow
up to 15 spaces in a row). There are 27 parking spaces in the row adjacent to the north
side of the shopping center building. Break up the parking with a landscape island
(minimum eight feet wide inside curbing).
18. Provide sign package. Show the location of existing/proposed freestanding signage,
including the existing/proposed setback from the property line(s), and provide the height,
area and color of existing/proposed signage. Include any proposed attached signage. The
Comprehensive Sign Program may be utilized to retain/modify existing signage.
19. Show the visibility triangles at all driveways, including those for the daycare on Hercules
Avenue and the driveway on Rogers Street, and at the intersections of Gulf to Bay
Boulevard/Hercules Avenue and Hercules A venue/Rogers Street. Revise the visibility
triangles on the landscape plan to Code size of 20' x 20' and to Code locations.
20. Address/show the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. Coordinate with landscaping.
Outdoor lighting is required to meet the requirements of Sections 3-1301-1302.
21. Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required
screening. If located on the roof, note such.
22. Provide traffic flow arrows and signage (including "do not enter" signage) to indicate
one-way traffic flow for the daycare.
23. Show the number, length and width of the daycare van parking space(s), as well as any
other parallel parking within this area of the site.
24. Owner will need to complete and record a Unity of Title document prior to issuance of
any building permits.
25. Provide a tree survey (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site,
by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating
trees to be removed) (please design around the existing trees). Technically, a tree
inventory, prepared a certified arborist of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size,
.
e
~
November 12,2003
Pergolizzi - Page 4
canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees is required to be submitted based on the
lot area (contact Rick Albee at 562-4741)
26. Revise site data table on Sheet 1 for "side (south)" to "front (south)" and to indicate a 25-
foot setback is required.
27. Indicate on the site plan (or other appropriate plan) all required parking lot interior
landscaping crosshatched or shaded, including the area of each interior area being
calculated.
28. Revise the landscape plan to indicate the amount of interior landscape area is being
provided (revise "open space provided" to "interior landscape area provided", se
Comment #27 above). A minimum of 10 percent of the paved vehicular use area is
required.
29. Coordinate the landscape plan and the site plan as to pavement versus landscape area
where the five sabal palms are proposed at the rear parking area near the "parking/service
area. "
30. Address any requirement for on-site stormwater management facilities.
31. Indicate the existing/proposed use of the second floor of the "daycare" building.
32. When resubmitting the application package for the Community Development Board
(CDB), please include a reduced landscape plan to scale (8 ~ X 11), in color, for CDB
presentation purposes.
33. Provide wheel stops and concrete curbing adjacent to landscape areas in the parking area
in the southeast portion of the site.
34. Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including
instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures.
35. Submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program application, addressing all criteria, based
on the requests outlined at the beginning of this letter (or as modified with revised plans).
Any responses to the above comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional
comments will be provided at the DRC meeting. The above comments and comments you will
receive at the DRC meeting must be addressed and revised documents submitted to the Planning
Department by noon on November 6,2003 (15 copies of all submittals).
The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on December 4,
2003, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater. Please call Sherrie
Nicodemus at 562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate
time that your case will be reviewed. You or a representative must be present to answer any
questions that the committee may have regarding your application.
.
.
November 12, 2003
Pergolizzi - Page 5
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access
zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com.
*Make us your favorite!
Sincerely,
!!:t:-w::lt~
Senior Planner
\IMS5c\PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending cases I Up for the next DRCIGulfto Bay 2005 Ace America's Cash Express {C} I Gulf to
Bay 2005 Complete Letter.doc
t.
.
.
:J Q..A\. ~
~~
W'~
t-h+t'~ t
L-8...:i'd-.- ~ ) R..
\1/1 0 10"3
August 26, 2002
Mr. Raphael Azzarone, Regional Vice President
ACE America's Cash Express
4300 West Cypress Street, Suite 210
Tampa, Florida 33607
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval (FLD2002-08025) to permit a
problematic use in the Commercial District within a building which does not meet
all of the current land development regulations (per Section 2- 704.K.4 of the Land
Development Code) and is within 500 feet of another problematic use (per Section
2- 704 K.l.a. of the Land Development Code), as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.B. and a
Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.
Dear Mr. Azzarone:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application to permit a problematic use in the
Commercial District within a building which does not meet all of the current land
development regulations (per Section 2-704.K.4 of the Land Development Code) and is
within 500 feet of another problematic use (per Section 2-704 K.l.a. of the Land
Development Code), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2- 704.B. and a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the
provisions of Section 3-1202.G at 2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard and determined that the
application is incomplete.
The following items and/or information are required in order to make your application
complete:
1. General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913.A.) one through six:
. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located;
. The proposed development will not hinder of discourage the appropriate
development and se of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof;
. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the posed use;
e,
.
August 26, 2002
Azzarone - Page Two
.
. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion;
. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and
. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent
properties.
2. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Criteria (Section 2-704.B.) one, and five
through seven:
. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for
development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use,
intensity and development standards;
. Suitable suites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of
uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater;
. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a
comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and
. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project
creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
3. A signed and sealed survey. The survey submitted was not signed;
4. Tree survey;
5. A site plan with the following information:
. Engineering bar scale;
. All required setbacks;
. All required sight triangles;
. Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior
landscaped areas;
. Location of all refuse collection facilities and enclosures (minimum 12
foot by 10 foot clear space);
. Location of all landscape material; and
. Location of all onsite storm-water management facilities.
6. A Site Data Table with the following information:
. Gross floor area devoted to each use;
. Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways,
expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
. Size and species of all landscape material;
. Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easements;
. Building and structure heights;
. Impermeable surface ratio; and
. Floor area ratio.
7. Reduced site plan;
'.
.
.
August 26, 2002
Azzarone - Page Three
8. The following information for developments over one acre:
. One- foot contours or spot elevations;
. Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater
management for the parcel;
. All open space areas;
. Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
. Building lines (dimensioned);
. Streets and drives (dimensioned);
. Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
. Structural overhangs; and
. Tree inventory, prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees eight inches
DBH or greater.
9. A landscape plan with the following information:
. All existing and proposed structures;
. Names of abutting streets;
. Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and
bottom elevations;
. Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape
buffers;
. Sight visibility triangles;
. Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including
landscaping islands and curbing;
. Proposed and required parking spaces;
. Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by
species, size and locations, including drip line (as indicated on
required tree survey);
. Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all
existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
. Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover
plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
. Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and
interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
. Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions
imposed by the Community Development Board);
. Irrigation notes;
. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 ~ X 11 ) (color
rendering if possible);
. IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three
applications); and
. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as
applicable.
August 26, 2002
.
.
.
Azzarone - Page Four
10. Stormwater plan with the following information:
. Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
. Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all
structures;
. All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
. Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of
slope and outlet control structure;
. Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
. Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and
calculations;
. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City
Building Permit), if applicable; and
. COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMW ATER SYSTEM TIE-IN
PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable.
11. Building elevations including all sides of all buildings with height dimensions,
colors and materials; and
12. Signage.
Provided that a complete application, including all of the required materials, is submitted
to Staff on or before September 19, 2002 (noon) it will be reviewed for sufficiency by the
Development Review Committee (DRC) on October 10, 2002 in the Planning
Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Service
Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue in Clearwater. Your packet will be made available to
be picked up at the greeter counter in the Planning and Development Services Department
until August 30, 2002 at which time it will be disposed of.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727.562.4558.
Sincerely yours,
Mark T. Parry
Planner
S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\Gulfto Bay 2005 Cash America\Gulfto Bay 2005
incomplete.doc
r-
M ~ . . ~
0
0 "8 i>
~ 'S:
0 ~ .'"
U u
- M 0 -<
-- N 1;\
- ....
- 0 I:lIl "
- .6 u
~
~
~
'0
!'::
'"
~ .
N~
~U
\0 0
t:!....
~ 23
..... !'::
o .$9
;g'P.
;.:: ~
],
"0 !5
!':: !'::
.,8 !5
a"""
._ "0
- !a
~.8
N N M
0 0 0
oC/.l oC/.l oC/.l
~~ ~~ ~~
N N -
-- -- --
00 00 -
C/.l C/.l C/.l
CJllnO ~ ~ ~
~ M ~
~~DJ
... >-
~ ic( -
~~ ~ .....
0
.~ 9 I- (l)
.... u.. ~ 11P
CJ~...J ~
-< .. ~
QJ =It: 0
~ ~ ~
~ = g (l) ~ ~
U UN 5 0 0
z z Z
N N M
0 0 0
0 0 0
N N N
-- -- --
N N ""'"
N N -
-- -- --
00 00 -
= ~
.9
~ "0
u (l) ~
.- >
~u .~ .-
<l)
u ~
~~I <l)
...
~ = =
i] .9 0
.-
.... ....
<<I <<I
.~ (,)
= .- .-
! 8 - ~
c..
~ ~
00 0 M
-0 0 - -
.... 0 0 0
.... -< -< -<
9 0 0
.....:l .....:l
~ ~ ~
A U,g. 4. 2 0 0 4 3 : 5 7 P M
.
.
No.8634 p. 1/5
" r-:' (" r- 'I' I.E' 0
' ,I ' t,,'~Y'~.!'l '1,' ;:;~,
R r::~",(r:,,,:,", \# " ' ,.'"
AUG 04 2004
(
, . 'r'. A....!\ 11'
'!\H ,i"'l\:I"
, I" I, p"", Mf','rr: f:)
t iLL}"';, II '.'!'It I ,..- ,
Fit
Fax
To, ~~_ tJ~1 LEA4,,1l1fU
Fax: az- 1?7~
FJom: _ ;::/1",1-1) )), 4.M 0
Pas.. p-
Date: ,4; ~ t/ ;,
,f
/
z,t? 'f
Phone;
lie: ~A7/1 ~t/I1I'tL
.JobNo= 113 ~ 1/2 7
cc:
Hardcopy lnsttudions:
D Reg..lar Mail
D Overnight Mail ~one to Follow
~MeBsage:
;:Pt7/ AIJ'Ewfi? CK"'~Cr/;,j !2,btlr
;::;/1- ~A1A N tllI/lL
The information contained in this tnmsmission is prMleged and confidential It is intended for the use of th9 Individual or enti~
named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended addressee. the reader Is heteby nOOfied that any consideration.
dissemination or dl,lpliCl;ltiOn af this communication Is strictly prohibited. If the recipient has received thI$ oommvnicatiOn in t!ll'J'Qr,
please return this lransmlsslon to uS at the addre55 above by mal.
THANK YOU!
--vb
-------
_I
A u/g, 4, 2 0 0 4 3 : 5 7 P M
.
.
No.8634 p, 2/5
$TA~ 01' f'lClAlQA O~AR1MENT OFlRANSPORTAllON
Rr':Y" .:
~'.', '.
ts.vl ....J~..
85lI-il<ll).18
'JUN 2 21~MSl>lAN:'~
p\NEu.AS tMlNTENANC!'"1 <113
DRIVEWAY CONNECnON PERMIT
FOR ALL CATEGORIES
Access Classification:
(:.~.'r"/ i~"
..;"', J .tc_
PART 1: PERMI'1' INfORMA nON
APPLICATION NUMSER: ,f>~~ 7~- eb(f'B
Permit Category:
;?C--
5
Project: Roma Square Shoppin~ Canter
Permittee; Roma Square
SectionlMlIe Post 15040/2.931
State Road: 60 - Gu~~o-Bay Boulevard
Section/Mile Post: .
State Road:
PART 2: PERMITTEE INFORMATION
Permittee Name: Roma Square, Inc. ..
~
Permittee Mailing Address: 516 Patricia Avenue
City, State, Zip: Dunedin Florida 34698
Telephone: SL~?l 734-2200
Engineer/Con5ul~ntlor Project Manager: Sean P. Cashen, P.E.
Engineer responsible for construction inspection: Sean P - Cashen I P.E. 42505
NAME P.lt,
Mailing Address: 13630 58th Street North, Suite 110
City, State, Zip: Clearwater, Florida 33760
Telephone: (727) 524-1818 FAX, Mobile Phone, etc. Fax: (727) 524-6090 v
PART 3: PERMIT APPROVAL
ASSISTANT PlNEllAS MAltmHANCE ENGINEER
TIUe:
Oepa
~t:6'Q~e f:z.~ 85.
Temporary Permit 0 YES P(NO (If temporary, this pennit is only valid for 6 month5)
Spedal provisions attached ~S 0 NO
Date of Issuance: ~ \ , ~
If this is a normal (non.tempol'3ry) permit it authorizes construction for one year fI'tlm the date of i$suance. This can only be
extended by the Department as specified in 14-96.007(6).
See following pagtlS for Genefaj and Special Provisions
Aug. 4. 2004 3:57PM
.
.
No.8634 P, 3/5
850.q,w.11l
SySteMS l'l.ANN~
(W03
/"Q~hf3
PART 4; GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. Notify the Department of Transportation Maintenance Office at least 48 hours in advance of starting proposed work..
Phone: (727) 570-5101 . Attention: Dan Karas
2. A copy of the approved pennit must be displayed in a prominent location in the immediate vicinity of the connection
construction.
3. Comply with Rule 14-96.008(1). F AC., Disruption of Traffic.
4. Comply with Rule 14-96.008(7). F AC., on Utility Notification Requirements.
5. All work performed In the Department's right of way shall be done in accordance with the most C1..Irrent Department
standards, specifications and the permit provisions.
6. The permittee shall not commence use of the connection prior to a final inspection and acceptance by the
Department
7. Comply with Rule 14-96.003(3)(a}, FAC., Cost of Construction.
S. If a Significant Change of the pennittee's land use, as defined in Section 336.182, Florida Statutes, occurs, the
Pennittee must contact the Department.
9. Medians may be added and median openings may be changed by the Department as part of a
Construction Project Of Safety Project. The provision for a median might change the operation of the connection to
be for right turns only,
10. All conditions in NOTICE OF INTENT WILL APPLY unless specifically changed by the Department.
11. All approved connection(s) and tuming movements are subject to the Department's continuing authority to modify
such connection(s) or tuming movements in order to protect ~fety and traffic operations on the state highway Of
State Highway System.
1:2. Transportation control Featu.-es and Devices in the State Right otWay. Transportation control features and
devices in the Department's right otway. including, but net limited to, traffic signals, medians, median openings, or
any other transportation control features or devices in the state right of way, are operational and safety
characteristics of the State Highway and are not means of access. The Department may install. remove or modify
any present or future transportallon control feature or device in the state right of way to make changes to promote
safety in the light of way or efficient traffic operations on the highway.
13. The Permittee for himlherself, hislher heirs, his/her assigns and successors in interest. binds and is bound and
obligated to save and hold the State of Florida, and the Department, im agents and employees harmless from any
and all damages, claims. expense, or injuries arising out of fIllY act, neglect, or omission by the applicant, his/her
heirs, assigns and successors in interest that may 0CClIf by reason of this facility design, construction,
maintenance, or continuing existence of the connection facility,except that the applicant shall not be liable under
this provision for damages arising from the sole negligence of the Department.
14. The Permittee shall be re5P,Onsible for determining and notify all other users of the right of way.
15. Starting work on the State Right of Way means that I am accepting all conditlons on the Permit
Aug, 4, 2004 3:58PM
.
.
No,8634
P, 4/5
~-':I:lO-'Jt
SYSTEMS Pl-ANNING
IMI03
~ge:3<lf3
PART 5: SPECtAL PROVISIONS
NON-CONFORMING CONNECTIONS:
QVES
000
If this is a norr-conforming connection permit, as defined in Rule Chaptens 14-96 and 14-97, then the follclNing shall be a part of
this permit.
1. Tile non-conforming connection(s) described in this permit is (are) not permitted for traffic volumes exceeding the Permit
Category on page 1 of this permit. or as specified jn "Other SDecial provisi9ns" below.
.J
2. All non-conforming connections will be subject to closure or relocation when reasonable access becomes available in
~~. .
OTHER SPECIAL PROVISIONS:
~
~.JJ-
.
PART 6: APPEAL PROCEDURES
Vou may request an administrative hearing pursuantto Seclions 120.569 and tZQ.57. F1oric1a statutes. If you disagree wil:t11he facts stated
in the foregoing Notice of Inteoded OepwtlT1erlt Acti<ln (herein~er' Notice), you may request 8 formal administrative hearing pursuant 10 Ser;tion
120.57(1), Florida StatlJte$. If yt)u agree with the fa~ stated in the Notice, you may request an informal adminis1rative hearing pursuant to
Sadlon 120,57(:2), Florida Statl.rte6. You m~t ljeod the writtefl requEl$t 1;0:
Clerk of AgtJnay Proceedings
Department of TransporiaUon
Haydon Bums Bulding
605 Suwannee street, M.S. 58
Tallahassee, Rorida 32399-0458
The written request for an administrative hearing must conform to the requirements of either Rllle 28-106.201(2) Of Rule 28-106.301(2},
Florida Administrative Code, and must be received by the Clerk of Agency F'roceedinge by 5;00 F' ,M.. no latet than 21 days atter you received the
Notice. The written req~ for an :oIdministrative hearing should include a copy at the NotIa!I, and must be legible, on 8 % by 11 inch white
~pElr. and contain:
i. Your Ilame, addtefil&, teleptlone num~r, and Department idenllfyll'lg number on the Notice, if known, and l18me. addre5!l,
and telephone number of yQl,If representaUve, if any;
2. An explal'Jatlon of how you are affected by lhe action cfe&Cribed II11he Nab.
3. A statement of how and WheJl you received 1I\e Notlce.
4. A statement of all disputed issues of l11iIteriel fact. If there are none. you must $0 Indcate.
5. A oonclslil staterrlent oHhe ultim* fad8 alJeged. as _II as the nJles and Slatutes whiGh entitle you to relief; and
6. A demand for reUef.
A forl'nal hearing will be held ifthere are disputed issued of material fac;i, If a fDmlal hea1fng is held, this matter will be referred to the OM6Ic)n of
AdministrrivEI Hearings, whE!l'a you ImIY pC'eSef1t witn~ .,d evldeIlce .nd C1'0fi$ examine other witnesses before an adtnil1il;;trative law
judgl,!. If there are no dl$puted hmIes of material fact, an infwmal heering wit bl, held, In which case you win have the right to provide 1he
Departmentwith any written documentatior1 or 1eg8! argurnen($ which you wI$h the OIiIpartmelrt1D conskler.
Mediation. pursuant tg SecIlon 120.573, FlQnda $taMes, wiH be SVllil8b1e If agreed to by all parties, and on such terms u muy be agreed upon
by all parliee. The right to an admini5lrative hearing is not affected when medletion does not result in a setIIement
If a written request IQr an administrative hearing i$ 001 1imely reoeived you 1IIIiII have waived yQl,lr right to have 1he in1ended action reviewed
pursuant to Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, and lI'Ie action set forth In the NoIlce $h8Il be conclusive and final.
Allg, 4. 2004 3:58PM
.
.
No.8634 P, 5/5
1. EROSION CON1':Q.OL BUR1ERS MUST BE IN PLACJ!: BEll'ORE WORK
STARTSlN 5'tATE lUGBT OF WAY.
2. PERMITTEE MUS't 5Ull'l.Y PROOF OF CONTRACl'OR'S LIABIlJl' INSURANCE
BEll'ORE ST.ul'X'lNG WORK IN F.D.O.T.lUGBT 0:1 WAY.
3. LANE CLOSVlU!<S AUOWED FROM 9:00PM -{j:OOAM MONDAY TO TBURSDA Y Dl$
TO R04J)WAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES.. o,Ob'URES NOl'ALLOWltD WIlKS 0' STATE!
nDERAL mOLIDAYs'
4. NEW DlUVEW AY CONSTRUCTED TO F.D.O.T. DESIGN STANDARD INDEX # 515
(2004 ED ROADWAY/TJUR11C DESIGN STANDARDS) CONCRETE FLARE DESIGN.
5. All sidewalk curb rau:ips sball have deteCtable waming surfaces (trunuted domes) pel'
FDOT Standard Index 304. The following vendors I mannfaduren or as approved by the
State Engineer:
a) InHne Tnmcated DOUlell EZ Tik supplied bYi Professional PavemeJlt Products
b) Topmark supplied by Flint Trading
c) Vanguard Truncated Dome supplied by Vanguard
6. 'tRUNCATED J>OME D:&sIGN llAMl'S PLACED ON 80TB SIDU OF NEW DlU1"EWAl'.
>>OT(:
s~ ~ lu~i'b, ~~,4 blfJJ
ta.e ,. ,#-I ~t>l;Jj t)AJ 6ll ~ 0 b 1 R (~
~at
:~ ;
.
~~,ECE\VED
.
FORM 8~24
SYSTEMS PLANNING
Page 1 of4
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JUL 1 6 2004
PROPOSED STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS CONNECTION
F" ,I\NNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE PERMIT
(fV OF CLEARV\II~rEF; THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
NOTE: THIS NOTICE OF INTENT IS ONLY VALID FOR I YEAR FROM SIGNING DATE IN PART 6
... ... PARTl:APPLICATIONINFORMA,TION --
APPLICATION NUMBER: 04-A-799-OOO8
CERT# 7099 3400 0016 2779 2675
Project Name ROffia Sauare ShoDDin2 Center
State Road Name/Number: SR-60. Gulf to Bav
Section Number: 15040
Maintenance Office: PINELLAS MAINTENANCE I BRIAN A BENNETT. P.E.
Permit Staffllepreseutative
Applicant: ROffia Square Inc.
(Responsible Officer): Sam C. Colucci. President
Mailing Address: 516 Patrica Avenue
Dunedin
Florida
34698
Street
City
State
Telephone: 727-734-2200
PART 2: NOTIct OF INTENT TO ISSUE PERMIT
YOU ARE HEREBY ADVISED:
The Florida Deparbnent of Transportation has completed its review of the subject connection permit Application
received 06/22/04 for consistency with Rule Chapters 14-96 and 14-97, F.A.C., and current Deparbnent spacing,
location, and design criteria ancl hereby issues this ''Notice of Intent" to:
Issue the subject permit consistent with the permit Application.
X Issue the subject permit consistent with the permit Application and subject to the attached provisions.
This notice of intent to issue a permit does NOT constitute Deparbnent permit issuance. The permit will be issued after
the permittee shows proof that a valid local government development approval or development order has been given to
the sites served by the connection and special provisions of the approval consistent with the permit applications and
conditions previously noted.
No connection work on the right-of-way shall be initiated until the Deparbnent Permit is actually issued. Any changes to
the site(s) plan will require re-evaluation of the connection(s). This notice is valid for one year, from the date ofissuance,
and can only be extended with approval by the Deparbnent for problems outside the control of the applicant pursuant to
Rule Chapter 14-96, F.A.C. This Notice of Intent is transferable as specified only in Rule Chapter 14-96, F.A.C.
Continued next page
rn
~n\Yl~
w
M 1'2004
CITY OF CLEARW~TfR
PUBtlC WORKS ADMiNISTRATION
.
.
FORM 850-040-24
SYSTEMS PLANNING
01/99
Page 2 of4
..
.. ..
..
...
.. PART3:CONDITIONS
.
Conditions to be ~et before Permit will be issued:
Standard:
1. Assurance of performance pursuant to Section 334.187, Florida Statutes (if required)
2. Notification of all known right of way users affected by the connection(s)
3. Compliance with drainage requirements in Rule Chapter 14-86, F.A.C.
Special:
1. Approved Drainage Permit or Letter of Exemption from F.D.O.T. District Drainage Department.
2. Add notation to plans that all cracked ldamaged sidewalk fronting property to be replaced by section to State Standards.
3 Add notation to plans that Jane closures on S.R-60 will be between 9:00PM and 5:00AM, Monday thru Thursday .No
closures will be allowed during the weeks of State or Federal Holidays.
4. Revise Plans to show land use code.
5. Revise Site plan to sbow internal circulation by use of arrows.
6. Place notation on plans that all disturbed areas within the Right of Way are to be sodded.
7. Note on plans to design driveway according to FOOT Standard Index 515. (plan "A", see flairs & tie into sidewalk.
8. Note on plans to constru~ DIW to Standard Index 515.Urban, flair, class 1 concrete, 3000lb, 6" thick.
9. Revise existing Section AA to show 5' sidewalk according to Standard # 304 (Truncated Domes )
10. Provide a profile from the center of the State Road through the proposed driveway showing and marking the existing
and proposed elevations at all breaks points. ( CIL of roadway, EOP, RIW line and etc.
11. Revise site plans to show all existing utilities in the area of the project
12. Place notation on plans that all existing driveways that are to be closed are shown to be removed and type UF" Curb
to be constructed to replace the driveway curb.
NOTE: UPON RECENING AN APPROVED PERMIT, BEFORE CONSTRUCTION IS TO BEGIN, THE APPLICANT
SHALL DELIVER TO THE DEPARTMENT PROOF OF INSURANCE VERIFYING THAT THE APPLICANT OR
THE APPLICANT'S CONTRACTOR HAS COVERAGE UNDER THE LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRA TNE CODE, RULE CHAPTER
4-96.007(5XC) 6.
If you should have any further questions, please contact Mr. Ron Seichko ofthisoffice at
(727) 570-5101.
.
- -:::;",;
.
.
FORM 850-040-24
SYSTEMS PLANNING
01/99
Pllll"3of4
J>ART4: NOTICEQFDEJ>ARTMENT AUfBORl1Y
1. All approved connection(s) and turning movements are subject to the Department's continuing authority to revoke or modify such connection(s) or turning
movements in order to protect safety and traffic operations on the state highway or State Highway System.
2. Transportation COJltrol Features in tbe state rigbt-or-way. Transportation control features in the Department's right of way, including, but not limited
to, traffic signals, medians, median openings, or any other transportation control features or measures in the state right of way are operational and safety
characteristics of the State Highway and are not means of access. The Department may install, remove, or modify any present or future transportation
control feature in the state right-of-way such as median opening, traffic control device, or a feature affecting turning movements through a connection, to
make changes to promote safety in the right of way or efficient traffic operations on the highway.
J>ART 5: DEJ>ARTMENT CONTACT
NAME: Ron Seichko
ADDRESS: 5211 ULMERTON ROAD
SIGNATURE OF DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL:
PRINT OR TYPE NAME: Brian A. Bennett. P.
PRINT OR TYPE POSITION: Pinellas Maintenance Engineer
ASSISTANT PINEllAS MAIKTENANCE ENGINEER
DATE: Julv 12.2004 PHONE: (7271 570 -5101
CC: D. Olson, N. Lataille, D. Karas, R.Seichko, R.Harris. C. Tarapani, file
.
.
~
PORM 850-()4()..24
SYSTEMS PLANNING
01/99
Page 4 of 4
pART 7: APPEAL PROCEDURES
In accordance with Section 120.57, Florida Statutes, you may request a formal proceeding pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, if you disagree with the facts stated in notice of
intent to issue penuit (hereinafter "Notice"). If you do not disagree with the fads stated in the Notice, or if you would prefer an informal proceeding, you may request an informal proceeding
pursuant to Section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes. You must mail or deliver the written request to:
Clerk of Agency Proceedings
Department ofTransportation
Haydon Bums Building
605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 58
TaUahassee, Florida 32399-0458
The written request for an administrative proceeding must conform to the requirements of Rules 28-106.104 and 28-106.111, Florida Administrative Code, and must be received no later than
~ 1 days after you have received the Notice. If a timely written request for an administrative proceeding is not received, the Notice will become conclusive and final and Department action
will be taken as stated in the Notice.
TIlE WRITTEN REQUEST MUST CONTAIN TIlE FOLLOWING:
l. Your name, address, and telephone number. and the Department application number.
2. An explanation of how you are affected by the action described in the Notice.
3. A statement of how and when you received the Notice.
4. A statement of whether you disagree with the facts stated in the Notice and. if so. what facts are disputed.
5. A statement of whether you disagree with any non-fuctuaI matters in the Notice (e.g., policy or legal statements) and. if so. what non-factual matters are
disputed.
6. A statement of the basic facts that support opposition or modification to the action to be taken under the Notice.
7. A statement identi1Ying any rules or statutes that are relied upon to support opposition or modification to the action to be taken under the Notice.
8 A statement of the relief that you seek.
9. A statement whether you are requesting a formal or informal proceeding...
10. A statement of any other information that you contend is material.
11. A complete copy of the Notice. including this Notice of Appeal Rights.
**FORMALVS.. INFO:RMAL PROCEEDING
In accordance with Section 120.57, Florida Statutes, you may request either a formal proceeding pursuant to Section 120.57(1). Florida Statutes. or an informal
proceeding pursuant to Section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes. However, to be entitled to a fu!ml!l proceeding, there must be disputed issues of materials fact (i.e., facts at
issue that are relevant under law or agency rule). If there are no disputed issues of material fact, an .mfm:ml!! proceeding will be held. If vou do not exnresslv reauest a
formal Droceeding. vour request will be treated as a request for an informal DroceedinlL
If a formal proceeding is requested and it is determined that you are entitled to a fu!ml!l hearing, this matter will be referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings,
where you may present witnesses and evidence and cross examine other witnesses befure a hearing officer. who will issue a recommended order that will be reviewed
by the Secretary of Transportation. You will be notified of the time, place, and date of the hearing by the Division of Administrative Hearings.
If an informal proceeding is held. you will have to provide the Department with any written documentation or legal arguments which you wish the Department to
consider. Ifvou wish to make an oral Dresentation (in Derson or by telephone). you must so state in vour request for an infonnaI Droceedinl!:. You will be notified as to
the time period within which to submit written documentation as well as a date at which an oral presentation may be made if you have requested such an opportunity.
G:\Nip2004\N1P0095Goodyear AntD.doc
RECYCLED *
Jul.13. 2004 11:22AM
'.
!
Golf Coast CoDSUlting, Inc.
Land ~GpDJl!Dt <hosU.ting
13630 58th St. N, Suite #110
aearwater, Ronda 33760
PhooE! (727) 524-1818
Fax: (127) 524-6090
Fax
..... ~/'& W~~wlJML--
Fax:' Y; Z- - f'~?p Pages:
Phone;
R.= ~AP""
a.t.:
.Job No:
.Jit/A-~
t:?J-??Z?
cc;
.
No.8362 P.1/5
IIJJ If @ ~ 0 W IE ~!!I
III JUL 1 3 2004 jJ
- -!
OEVELOPMENT SERVICES OEPT
C YR'
I?c';:'q
-
5
~L)1'
7
AL"/5
/3
2&7#(
Hardcopy IIWt....ctio"s:
O_MaIl 0_...._ Y_.......ow
~Messa..
Hi; ;J~e ~
:r >fr/,t;- dt-e-,r;
-
..I;v7iF~r
7&:1
The inronnation contained In this tra.lSI1lis$Ooo is privileg<<l al'ld CXlIlfidential. It is intended for the use of the individual or entity
named above. If \I'le reec:.ler of this message is not the intended adlh!ssee, the reader is hereby notified that any consideration.
dissemination or dupUcallon of lhis CXII't'II'l\U'ICElIOn i& slric:lly prohibited. If the recipient has received this oommunication in error.
please retum thlslnmsmission In us at the adlhsG above by maI-
THANK YOUl
Jul.13. 2004 11:22AM
.
.
jfhNo. 8.362~,. P._ 2/5#27
PQRM~
MTBMS l>LAJOONG
hgo 101'4
'..,
STATB OP fL01IIDA DIil'All.JMJ;m" fJl' 'nlA1lSPORtA'nON
PROPOSED STATE WGHWAY ACCESS CONNECTION
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE PERMIT
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
Non:: nns NOTICE OF OOENT IS ONLY VALID FOR I YEAR FROM SIGNlNG DAre IN PMT 6
PART l: Al'PLlCA.110N INFoRMATION
APPLlCA nON NUMB:&R.: 04-A-799-OO08
CEIl'" 7899 3400 80Ui '1.779 2675
l'.-ojcct NDJJJe Rom&. SQUare ~I ~enler
State Road N!IIlIAINwnbct; Slt-60. Gulf to Bav
Section NlImber: ~ J5040
Maillt'elWlce OffiCe: J~n.M MAINTENANCE I BRIAN A BBNNBTI. P.E.
hrmilStalf~
Applicant Roma Square Inc.
~pon$jblt: OffiCC{): Sam C. Colucci. Pn:sidc:nt
MaIling Addrsss: 516 Patrica Ave.nuc:
~
Ounc:diu
Florida
34698
City
~
Telephone:: 727-734.2200
PART 2: NOTICE OF':iNrENT TO ISSUE p;Q,Mrr
YOU ARE HEREBY ADVISED:
The Florida Department of Transportation has completed its review oftbe subject connection permit Application
received 06/22104 fur consistency with Rule Chapters 14-96 and 14-97, F.A.C., and cmrent Department spacing.
location, and design criteria an4 hereby issues this "Notice ofIotentn to:
Issue the subject permit consistent with the permit Application.
X Issue the subject permit consistent with the peI'JDit Application and subject to the attached provisions.
This notice of intent to issue a petmit does NOT constitute Department penntt issuance. The permit will be issued after
the permittee shows proof that a valid local government development approval or development order has been given to
the sites s~ed by the connection and special provisions of the approval consistent with the permit applications and
conditions previously noted.
No connection work on the right-of-way shall be initiated until the Department Permit is actually issued. Any changes to
the site(s) plan will require re--c::valuation of the oonnection(s)- This notice is valid for one year, from the date ofissuance,
and can only be extended with approval by the Deparbnent for problems outside the control of the applicant pursuant to
Rule Chap~ 14-96, FA.C. This Notice of Intent is transferable as specified only in Rule Chapter 14-96, F.A.C.
Continued next page
Jul.13. 2004 11:23AM
.
e
No.8362
p. 3/5
FORM~
sn'mMS PLANNIN<l
OIJll9
P..,2<lf4
h.\ol:Iia~',
..."........
PART 3: CONDmONS
Conditicms to be: met bdim: l'croJit will be issued:
Standa(d:
1. .Assul'arl.cc ofperlbrmance putBlIant to SoctiOn 334.187, Florid. StBtl$:s (if~)
2. Notification of 8lI kDoMI right ofway U5el'S affected by the coon~n(6)
3. Cotnplianc:e with dnIina8e .-equimn~ in Rule CbIIpk:t 14-86, F AC.
Spe<;iIil:
.1. .Approved Drainage Pemrit or IAttU" ofl1XemptiOll front FD.O.T. District I>raioaee Department
~. Add 1l0lllCi00 to plaua lb&t all crac1axl/dam8g1:d sidewalk 1tonUllg propc:n;y lQ be J:ql.lsced by ~on to S~ Stau~
3 Add n.otatiOIl to plalls that lane clOll1lteS on S.R.-60 will be benwcn 9:00PM qd 5:00AM, Mo.nd8y thru lb~dtly .No
closuros willlM: alIo~ dlUillg the: wM of State or Federal Holidays.
4. Revise l"l.ans to \\bow land nsc: code.
s.. REI\Iise Site plan to sbDw intmJal circulation by U$C ofaauw&.
6. Pla4le notation Oil. plans tbIlt all dimdxxI_ within the Right of Way are to be sodded.
7. 'Note OIl plims to deslgn driveway according to PDOT Stamlard Index 515. (pIlm HI.:' , see ~ B:; tie into sidcwalk.
8. N~ 011_ to QOIISlnlet DIW to SQlIIdaN IJIdClll: 515. Urou, fIQ-, clQa 1 amcn:lc , 30001b , G'thid.
9. Revise ~ Section AA 10 show 5' sidewalk according to Standard # 304 ('l'rnncated Domes )
to. Providea piofne from the ceD_ofdle Stau: Road through the pl'OpO!lCd driveway sbowiag BDd IIIIIrlcing the existing
aDd proposed eirnItion.s at aD. bJ1:a1cs pc;Iin.ts. ( CfL of roadwlry, EOP, RIW IiDe end etc.
11. Revise '* p/.IQ to $bow 11II eUtiDgutilities in lhe area of the project.
.12. Pl8ce IIOIBtioa OIl pJaus ibat aD eKistiDg driveways that IIJ'C to be ~ arc shown 11) be ~lMXi BQd type .'P' CurlJ
to be c:ollSlmClled to Iq)Iace ~ dtiveway c.w,.
NOTE: UPON RECENING AN APPROVED PERMIT, BEFORE CONSTRUCTION IS TO 8BGiN, 1HE APPUCANT
SHALL DELIVER TO THE DBPARlMEN1' PROOF OF INSURANCE VER1fY1NG THAT THE APPUCANT OR
1llE APl>UCAN'f'S CONnACTOR HAS COVERAGE UNlJE.R. tHE UABILITY INSURANCE POLICY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE RBQUJREMENTS OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, RULE CHAPTER
4-96,OO7(5)(C) 6.
lfYOll should have any further question~ please contact Mr. Ron Seichko ofthis office at
(727) .570-5101.
'Jul.13.200411:23AM
.
.'
No.8362
p. 4/5
-.,
FOIlN~
SYSlliMS PlAJolllll>lG
Oll99
.....~of..
PART 4: NOTICI. OF DEPARTMENT AumOlU'I'V
1. All approved conucctiQJI($) and turnjng mow:metlts ate subjclct to the ~s eootilluiJlg llllthority to teWIce ct l'IlociitY 'Q.Qh COIlJleCticm(s) Qf tutnmg
moWinell1S in order to protect safely and traffic operaliollS on 1tIe state histrwaY or Stale Highway System.
2. 'l''''IISporta~OO Co~~1 Fe.h"~ i.. tJJ.e state rigllt-or-.y. TransportatiOll ~ f~ in the Depamnent's ri,ght of way, including, but not lirojtM
10, t:OOfic s.ignaJ$, medians, tnfldiml opcnUll!s, at IlDy other ~ control ~ Of nlelJSutt/; in the r;taiD right of'llU1lY ~ ~ lID.d safety
dlllt8Ctorlstic:s of lite> Stille HishWllY and life Dot melItIS ofaecess. Thlil ~ may inslalI. remove, or modilY 8I:\Y ~em or future 1raospol'talion
cootrol f~ in the ,late Jisbs-W-way such as median opcnbJ& traf6c eoDtroI dcMre, or a 1eJIture aff'ecting tIIl'lIbtg lIlOVCments tbJcmP a COIIDcctiOO, to
!DUe cblliiges to Ilrornote sdlty in the right of "Way or ef&ieot ltIdIk: operatioDs 011 the hjghway.
, PART 5: DEPAllTME1'f.r CONtACT
NAME: Ran Seic.bko
ADDRESS: ~211 ~TON ROAD
CLBARWATBR.. FLORIDA 33760
PHONE: (727) 570.5101
SIGNATIJRE OF DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL:
ASSISTAItT PlNBlAS MAlrmNANCE ENGINEER
F1UNT OR TYPE NAME: B .
P.R.lN1 Olt ll"PB l'OSnlON: PineUu Maintenance En~er:r
DATE: Ju\.v 12.2004 PHONB: f7'J:1) 570 -5101
cc: D. Olsoa. N. Lataille, D. Karas, R.Seichko, IUIani.s, C. 'lmpqi. fik
. . . Jul.13. 2004 11:23AM
.
.
No.8362
p. 5/5
PQRJ.I ~
SYS~~G
0"",,
hp 4 0(4
1'.u:r7: gl"Ul. tltOClWUUS
Jn~~VIitb. SeodOllI20.$7. Florida Statuil$, )IO\I.~~a lbmJol ~ ~ to Seclicm 120.~1(1). ~ S~ if"", ~ Mth the flIds sta~ iuDOticc of
iDt8Dt to isllllC permit (hereiDattu "NoDClII"). Jfyou do DOt ~ wilh tIul filIlta :stmd m the NoIige, or ifJOU would ~ 8B iDronnaI ~ you m~ RqUCSt an iDfmmaI proceediDg
~to SectiulI20.S7(2),Fbida StaIule$. YOllQlllStmailar delivellhewrillmnlqUCllllO:
Cl.cIk of ~ I'nlccediup
Dep.uoaIt of'IDmspcrnalilm
~ 8aoI5:911ildioa
605 ~ Str=. M.S. ~a
TaIIaIIaI&ee, Fkldda 323~S8
Tho wtittm request for au. ~ ~1D8It-'Oma to tbe ~ ofR*, 28-106.104 MId 23-106.111, FtoridaAdmimslrati...., Code, IIIIdmustbcreccMdno 1sla"1bm
21 days after you bavereccMd die NoIice. Jia timcJywrillall'cqaeat for.. ..-m;~ pvcmfiuginot~ 1bc: NoIiI:e will booomc conclusive lIIId fja)al andDqlmtmeot actiOlI
wm be taII:'IlI. ~ $IlIled. in (be NQIiee.
'tHE WRl1TEN REQUEST MUSl' CONTAlN 'l'IK JlOLl.OWlNG:
l. Y01lr Mme, ~ atld 1depbonc: D.Wl:lOO, and 1bc: ~ lIpplialtion ownb<<J.
~. An ex:pJanatiml of how yon are affected by Jhe actioD descnDed i111be NOliccl.
3. A slatelDent ofhow ruu:I when you n:ocivcd the Notice.
4~ A staiEmcnt ofWhetber ymJ disajp'CC wi1h the &CIS !It*d in 1hc Naticc and, if 80, what fads ue ctiapotm.
.:l. A. staIImlElnC ofwhedlor)'Oll Om8"tl witb llIlY llon.fiIc1ual mattors in die NCJIioo (o.g.. poJicy or lopl ~) and, if so, what llO&-tac:tual mldtel's _
disputed.
..
6. A lltamnent of the basic filc1s tbat SIlpJlOO OPPOSidon 01' mo4ificaIiOD 10 lhc action to be flIka1 UDder the Notice.
7. A sUrteme.ot jdellti~8 aay l'ltles or stabiles 1hat ere retied 1lpClIIl1O Sllpport oppositioll or modificatioIl to tl\e fICtion 10 be ~ UDder the Notloc.
8 A 8~CJrt (lithe rcliefthat)'O~ seck.
9. A statement wUlher you are requesting a iOnnal or iDfbrmal proceeding.....
10. A statetneut of IQIY other W'onnatioD that you conla)d is UIBIIrild.
11. A complete copy ofb Notice, including 1his Notice of Appeal Ri8b1S.
;'~FORMAL vs. IN]itutM'.&. T. PROCElIDlNG
In acconiance with Scctionl20S7, Florida S1a1U~S. you may request either a formal ~iDg pursgant to Section 120.S7(1), Florida Statutes, or llII. infotmaI
prooeediug plU'Suantto Section 120.57(2), Florida Si8iutcs. HowCYC{. to be c:atidal to B~ proc:ccdiDg, there IIIU8t be dj,putcd maes ofmatcri.ts fact (i.e" &cts.t
i$$1lC tbaI: ate rclcwnt un~ClJ law or ~cy mle). Iftl1efe are no diSpllfed issues oftllll1aW fiJct. an in1UImal prooeediIIg will be held. Jf:vou d~ CXPI'eSslY: rell1lcSt il
formalQ~~ YllUI: TCQUCBt will be Irmted as a rcouest for an iIlfonnal Drl)CN"Iin~
tt a.fu!m!l! pnlCCCdiDg ill mquesiBd BJJd b: js dctQnnined lblU yolIlI(e en1i:tJed 10 a 1D!mIl beari.og, this ~ will be: ~ to the Division of AdmiDiSO'ative HwiIIgs,
wbm; you may.~t witnesses and evidence and erofi OlWlJiDe olberwit0e6Je8 be:fute a hearing ofHccr, who will ~ a nlCOlOOIcudcd O(dClJ 1hat will be reviewed
by the Secretmy ofT~. 'VeRI will be: notified of1he iline. plaee. and dire ofthc b.eari>>8 by tb.t DivisiOll of ~ Hearings.
no an ~ ~ ill.hc:Jd. )'OU wiD haw 10 provide die DepartmeIIl VfiIh llDY written docUlllel1latioD or legal ~ which you 'Wish tbe Depm1mcnt to
OOIISider. U.mu.m. to mllke 11II onlllJJcscDtaticm (in pcrsoo or by~) }'OIl must so stale in your ~ fur . infbrma1 ~. You win be notified as to
dle time:: period within wbich 10 SIIbmit wriUen d~ as VIdl as a" lit which lID 0J1I1 ~, may be made if you lIaw requested such an opponuni1y.
O:\Ni)t2004\\'llP\109S~~dao
1IlCYOJlI)*
.
.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING ACTION AGENDA
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 2:00 p.m. City Hall
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: January 20,2004
ACTION: APPROVED 6:0 AS SUBMITTED.
D. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE: (Item 1)
1. Case: FLD2003-11058 - 161 Briahtwater Drive
Owner/Applicant: Paul Camp Lane (Clearwater Townhomes, Inc., 7087 Grand National
Drive, Suite 100, Orlando, FL 32819; phone: 407-316-0343; fax: 407-316-0372).
Representative: Bill Woods (Woods Consulting, Inc.; 322 Ridge Road, Palm Harbor, FL
34683; phone: 727-861-5747; fax: 727-786-7479; cell: 727-871-0084; email:
billwoods@woodsconsultina.ora).
Location: 0.47 acres located on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 800
feet east of Hamden Drive.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit the construction of five multi-use
docks providing 10 slips for a 1 O-unit townhome, with each dock measuring 54 feet in
length (25 percent of the waterway width) from seawall and 1,080 square feet of total
decking for the five proposed docks, under the provisions of Section 3-601.
Proposed Use: Five shared multi-use docks.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827
Mandalay Ave., Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 446-5801; email: dmacnav@att.net).
Presenter: Bryan Berry, Planner.
ACTION: CONTINUED 7:0
E. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the applicant, staff,
neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of
the meeting (Items 1 - 6):
1. Case: FLD2003-10055-2001-2021 Gulf to Bav Blvd/511 S. Hercules Avenue Level Two
Owner/Applicant: Roma Square, Inc.
Representative: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. (13630 58th Street
North, Suite 110, Clearwater, FL 33760; phone: 727-524-1818; fax: 727-524-6090;
email: perao@aulfcoastconsultinainc.com).
Location: 1.98 acres located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Gulf to Bay
Boulevard and Hercules Avenue.
Atlas Page: 298B.
Zoning: C, Commercial District.
Request: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in the
Commercial District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay
Boulevard from 25 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (west)
setback along Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement),
reductions to the front (south) setback along Rogers Street from 25 feet to one foot (to
existing building) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions to the
side (east) setback from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero
Community Development Action Agenda 2004-02-17
.
.
feet (to existing pavement), a reductionto required parking from five spaces per 1,000
square feet (114 spaces) to 4.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet (100 spaces), a deviation
to locate a problematic use contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel and a deviation to
locate a problematic use within a building which does not meet all of the current land
development regulations and building regulations, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704. Land (2) to permit a
reduction to the landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 feet to 7.8
feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Hercules Avenue
(west) from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape
buffer along Rogers Street (south) from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from
10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the
east property line from five feet to one foot (to existing building) and a reduction to the
width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five feet to
zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-
1202.G.
Proposed Use: Problematic use (check cashing).
Neighborhood Association: Skycrest Association (Elizabeth France, 1629 Cleveland
Street, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: 727-442-5856; email: eaf5054(Q>.earthlink.net ).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
ACTION: APPROVED 5:1 WITH Bases for Approval: 1LThe proposal complies with
the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per
Section 2-704.C; 2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code
including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913 and the Comprehensive
Landscape Program per Section 3-1202.G; and 3) The development is compatible with
the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1) That the applicant (Ace America
Cash Express) buyout the lease of R & W Pawn and Jewelry, apply for City building
permits for interior renovations and for site improvements, and obtain required FOOT
Access Permits by August 17, 2004. Failure to accomplish all three items within this
time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the COB to be null and
void and cause enforcement action to be initiated again. Failure by the applicant to
diligently and timely pursue the issuance of, and completion of, required building permits
for the purpose of issuing an Occupational License for Ace America Cash Express after
completion of those improvements, shall be grounds to deem the Flexible Development
approval null and void and also cause enforcement action to be initiated again; 2) That a
Comprehensive Sign Program be submitted by August 17, 2004. The Comprehensive
Sign Program shall include both freestanding and attached signage. Shopping center
freestanding signage shall be reduced to a height acceptable to the Planning
Department, have consistent color, have consistent tenant message panels and
individual lettering and have the site address revised to be read horizontally. The day
care center freestanding sign height shall be acceptable to the Planning Department, be
consistent in color as the shopping center freestanding signage and shall include the site
address. Attached shopping center signage shall have a consistent color of background
panels and individual lettering. All necessary sign permits shall be obtained by October
17,2004, to effect changes approved under the Comprehensive Sign Program; and 3)
That the double dumpster enclosure be consistent in materials and color as the principal
building.
2.
Case: FLD2003-08036 - 935 Lakeview Road
Item Pulled From Consent Agenda
Level Two Application
Community Development Action Agenda 2004-02-17
2
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
Owner/Applicant:
Representati ve:
Address:
.
.
February 17, 2004 ORIGINAL
FLD2003-10055
D1
Roma Square, Inc.
Mr. Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.
2001-2021 Gulf to Bay Boulevard and 511 South Hercules Avenue
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ST AFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
EXISTING ZONING/
LAND USE:
Flexible Development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in
the Commercial District with a reduction to the front (north) setback
along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing
pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback along South
Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement),
reductions to the front (south) setback along Rogers Street from 25
feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 25 feet to zero feet
(to existing pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10
feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero feet
(to existing pavement), a reduction to required parking from five
spaces per 1,000 square feet (114 spaces) to 4.4 spaces per 1,000
square feet (100 spaces), a deviation to locate a problematic use
contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel and a deviation to locate a
problematic use within a building which does not meet all of the
current land development regulations and building regulations, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions
of Section 2-704.L and (2) to permit a reduction to the landscape
buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 feet to 7.8 feet
(to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along
South Hercules Avenue (west) from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing
pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Rogers Street
(south) from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10
feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape
buffer along the east property line from five feet to one foot (to
existing building) and a reduction to the width of the required
foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five feet to
zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the
provisions of Section 3-1202.G.
C, Commercial District; Commercial General (CG)
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17, 2004 - Case FLD2003-10055 - Page 1
.
.
SITE SIZE:
1.98 acres
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use: Shopping Center
Proposed Use: Replacement and enlargement of a Problematic Use
(check cashing)
ADJACENT ZONING/
LAND USES:
North: C, Commercial District; retail sales
West: I, Institutional District; Clearwater High School
East: C, Commercial District; retail sales
South: 0, Office District; vacant
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.98-acre site is located at the southeast comer of
the intersection of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and South Hercules Avenue. The Gulf to Bay Boulevard
corridor is highly developed commercially. Clearwater High School is located to the west across
South Hercules Avenue. A vacant parcel, zoned Office District, is located to the south across
Rogers Street. The properties to the north and east are developed commercially with retail
establishments.
The site is currently developed with a 22,692 square-foot shopping center, which includes a day
care center located at 511 South Hercules Avenue (northeast comer of South Hercules Avenue and
Rogers Street). A problematic use (R & W Pawn and Jewelry) has existed legally at this shopping
center at 2007 Gulf to Bay Boulevard from at least July 1997. On November 29, 2000, an
Occupational License application was submitted to the City for Ace America Cash Express, also a
problematic use, to locate at 2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The Occupational License has not been
able to be issued, as this use requires Flexible Development approval by the Community
Development Board (CDB), including deviations to allow the problematic use to locate adjacent to
residentially zoned property and to locate within 500 feet of another problematic use. Ace
America Cash Express has operated at this location since 2000 without approval from the City,
including a valid Occupational License.
The site lacks very little landscaping along Gulf to Bay Boulevard, South Hercules A venue and
Rogers Street. There are three existing driveways on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and South Hercules
Avenue and two driveways on Rogers Street. There is one freestanding sign for the shopping
center located at the intersection of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and South Hercules Avenue, one
freestanding sign for the shopping center located on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and one freestanding
sign for the day care center located on South Hercules Avenue.
Proposal: The proposal includes Ace America Cash Express buying out R & W Pawn and
Jewelry and combining the two tenant spaces to be used solely by Ace America Cash Express. In
doing such, the end effect of this proposal will be to have only one, legal problematic use at this
location. The applicant proposes to buyout the lease, apply for City building permits for interior
renovations and for site improvements, and obtain required FDOT Access Permits within six
months of CDB approval. Failure to accomplish all three items within this time frame will cause
this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null and void and cause enforcement action
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17, 2004 - Case FLD2003-10055 - Page 2
.
.
to be initiated again. Failure by the applicant to diligently and timely pursue the issuance of, and
completion of, required building permits for the purpose of issuing an Occupational License for
Ace America Cash Express will be grounds to deem the Flexible Development approval null and
void and also cause enforcement action to be initiated again.
The applicant proposes to modify or eliminate driveways on all three abutting streets. Driveways
on Gulf to Bay Boulevard will be reduced from three to one, retaining the easternmost driveway.
Cross access with the adjacent property to the east close to Gulf to Bay Boulevard will be retained.
The driveway for the shopping center on South Hercules Avenue will be reduced in width from
approximately 39 feet to 24 feet. The traffic flow for driveways associated with the day care
center portion of this site on South Hercules A venue will be restricted and channelized through
signage (do not enter signage). A reduction of the number of driveways on South Hercules
Avenue associated with the day care center is not possible due to the existing porte-cochere and
the height of the day care center vans. The driveway on Rogers Street for the day care center will
remain. There is presently only one driveway for the parking area in the rear of the shopping
center off Rogers Street, whereas modification of this parking area will require two driveways, but
in a more efficient design and traffic flow. The easternmost driveway on Rogers Street will
provide access to a new double dumpster enclosure (which will need to be consistent in materials
and color as the principal building).
Parking will be brought up to current Code design requirements, including the insertion of interior
landscape islands to break up the number of parking spaces in a row and the relocation and
provision of handicap parking with required walk aisles and access to public sidewalks within the
Gulf to Bay Boulevard and South Hercules Avenue rights-of-way. Due to the position of the
existing shopping center building and parking design requirements, the front setback along Gulf to
Bay Boulevard to the edge of existing pavement is proposed to be a minimum of 7.8 feet on the
east side to 10.5 feet on the west end close to the intersection with South Hercules A venue. Also
due to the position of the existing shopping center building in relation to South Hercules Avenue,
there is no opportunity to provide a landscape buffer along this portion of the site frontage (hence,
the reason for a front setback reduction to zero feet [to existing pavement]). However, that portion
in front of the day care center will be landscaped (minimum 11 feet setback). The proposal
includes a zero-foot front setback along Rogers Street to existing pavement only at the intersection
of South Hercules Avenue and Rogers Street. These spaces are for the day care center vans.
Parking at the rear of the shopping center will be modified to provide a front setback along Rogers
Street of 15 feet (to existing pavement). This rear parking area will be modified to provide
landscape areas between the parking rows and a landscape area along the east property line of five
feet in width.
The proposal includes a parking reduction from the required 114 parking spaces (five spaces per
1,000 square feet) to 100 spaces (4.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet). There are 90 existing parking
spaces on-site. The applicant has submitted a parking analysis that showed, at peak use, only 49
percent (44 parking spaces) of the existing 90 parking spaces were utilized. This proposal
increases the amount of parking spaces from 90 to 100. Based on the parking analysis, adequate
parking will be available. On-street parking on the south side of Rogers Street and on the east side
of South Hercules Avenue also exists.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17,2004 - Case FLD2003-10055 -Page 3
.
.
The applicant proposes to significantly improve the appearance of this site by installing
landscaping along the street frontages, where possible, and within the parking lot. Much like
setback reductions (to existing pavement), the proposal includes reductions of required landscape
buffers. The landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) is proposed to be reduced from
15 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), the landscape buffer along South Hercules Avenue is
proposed to be reduced from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and the landscape buffer
along Rogers Street is proposed to be reduced from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and
from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement). The landscape buffer along the east property line
is also proposed to be reduced from five feet to one foot (to existing building). The proposal
includes a reduction to the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building
from five feet to zero feet, which is not possible due to the building location and parking lot design
requirements. These reductions are what are possible, given existing site conditions, and will in
harmony with the character of the surrounding area and will not substantially impact the abutting
properties.
The criteria for problematic uses are more stringent than the criteria for other commercial uses to
ensure that the businesses are consistent with the general purposes of the Community
Development Code. This includes ensuring that the development will not have a negative impact
on the value of surrounding properties, requiring that existing and future uses are attractive and
well-maintained, minimizing conflicts between uses and enumerating density, area, width, depth,
height, setback, coverage and like requirements for each district.
The applicant is proposing to retain all three freestanding signs, basically in their existing
nonconforming conditions. The two freestanding signs for the shopping center are generally
similar in design (sign height, sign color and individual tenant message panels [white background
with red lettering]). There are, however, only a few panels of a different color and/or lettering.
The Code requires signs to be architecturally integrated into the design of the building and/or site
using similar and coordinated design and style features, materials and colors. The Code requires
that in the event a building permit is required for the redevelopment of a principal use/structure, or
a principal use/structure is vacant for a period of 180 days, signs on the parcel proposed for
development shall be brought into compliance. A building permit will be required for interior
remodeling to combine the two tenant spaces for R & W Pawn and Ace America Cash Express.
The Flexible Development criteria for problematic uses requires signage which has a height of
greater than six feet is part of a comprehensive sign program. The existing signs for the shopping
center are approximately 18 feet tall. To be consistent with prior Flexible Development approval
for a problematic use at 1916 Gulf to Bay Boulevard (Case No. V AR1999-F2010, approved on
August 17, 1999), which required a six-foot high monument sign, the height of these shopping
center signs should be reduced in height, acceptable to the Planning Department, through a
Comprehensive Sign Program. Additionally, these freestanding signs for the shopping center
should have consistent sign message panels (background color and lettering color). It is noted that
Ace America Cash Express has not been established legally and all changes made to signage are,
therefore, not legal. This uniformity of signage has been applied to many other shopping center
properties elsewhere in the City. To improve readability, addresses on the freestanding shopping
center signs are proposed to read horizontally, rather than vertically. The freestanding sign for the
day care center should be included as part of the Comprehensive Sign Program.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17, 2004 - Case FLD2003-10055 - Page 4
.
e
Attached signage is also proposed by the applicant to remain unaltered. All attached signs have
individual lettering on a white background, with the exception of Beepers and Phones (2015 Gulf
to Bay Boulevard), the card shop (2019 Gulf to Bay Boulevard) and Ace Cash America Express
(2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard). Also, based on Section 6-104.A and Section 3-1806.B, those
attached tenant signs that are not on a white background with individual lettering should be
changed. Attached signage should be included as part of the Comprehensive Sign Program
Deviations to locate a problematic use contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel and to locate a
problematic use within a building that does not meet all of the current land development
regulations and building regulations are requested. The overall site touches at the southeast comer
property zoned Medium High Density Residential District, which is developed with the
Canterbury Oaks apartment complex. While this constitutes being contiguous, the actual tenant
space is over 200 feet away from the apartment complex property and is oriented toward Gulf to
Bay Boulevard, minimizing any negative impacts. The existing site and building do not meet
current land development and building regulations. This shopping center has existed at this
location for some time, being developed under previous, less stringent regulations. The expanded
tenant space will be brought up to current building regulations as part of this proposal. The site
will be brought into conformance with current land development regulations to the greatest extent
possible. Requiring full compliance with current regulations would create an undue hardship on
the property owner.
All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability
criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2-
704.C) have been met.
Code Enforcement Analysis: An Occupational License application for this use was reviewed by
Zoning, which requires CDB approval prior to issuance. A letter stating such was sent to the
business December 14, 2000. The Occupational License application has been in the CRT / OCL
hold folder since December 14, 2000. While there was correspondence or phone calls during early
2001, numerous phone calls regarding this use were made during the latter half of 2002. A
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Flexible Development application was filed with the
Planning Department on August 22, 2002 (FLD2002-08025). A letter of incompleteness, dated
August 26, 2002, was sent identifying information necessary to make the application complete.
This incomplete application was deemed withdrawn on December 26, 2002, when application
material to make it complete was not submitted. A Notice to Appear was issued on October 13,
2003, to the store manager on the violation (CDC2002-01305). The subject FLD application was
submitted on October 21, 2003. Bob Hall of the Community Response Team spoke with Leah
Letice from Johnson Blakely (461-1818) on November 13, 2003. He informed her that this
information (filing of this FLD application) is satisfactory for the City not issuing citations at this
time. As long as the client does not withdraw the case or fail to bring the property into compliance,
then we will allow the processes to occur. However, once the processes stop toward compliance,
we would need to initiate enforcement again.
Staff Report- Community Development Board - February 17, 2004 - Case FLD2003-10055 - Page 5
.
.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA (Section 2-701.1 and 2-704):
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.26 X
AREA RATIO
(maximum 0.65)
IMPERVIOUS 0.768 X
SURFACE RATIO
(ISR) (maximum 0.85)
LOT AREA (10,000 86,060 square feet (1.98 acres) X
sq. ft. minimum)
LOT WIDTH (100 North: 331 feet X
feet minimum) West: 260 feet
South: 332 feet
FRONT SETBACK North: 7.8 feet (to existing pavement) X*
(25 feet minimum) West: zero feet (to existing pavement)
South: one foot (to existing building);
zero feet (to existing pavement)
REAR SETBACK (20 N/A** X
feet minimum)
SIDE SETBACK (10 East: one foot (to existing building); X*
feet minimum) zero feet (to existing pavement)
HEIGHT (30 feet 25 feet (day care portion); 12 feet X
maximum) (shopping center portion)
PARKING SPACES 100 spaces X*
(five spaces/1,000
square feet) (114
spaces required)
*See Analysis for discussion.
**The site has three front setbacks; the east side requires a side setback.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17, 2004 - Case FLD2003-10055 - Page 6
.
.
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-704.C):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X
development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use,
intensity and development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair
market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X
otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
4. The use or mIX of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X
Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of X
uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X
Project creates a form and function that enhances the community
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X
street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the
City of Clearwater as a whole.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X
shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS Section 3-913 :
Consistent Inconsistent
1. X
2. X
3. X
4. X
5. of the X
6. X
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17,2004 - Case FLD2003-10055 - Page 7
.
.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on
December 4, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPRO V AL of the Flexible
Development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in the Commercial District with a reduction
to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing
pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback along Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet
(to existing pavement), reductions to the front (south) setback along Rogers Street from 25 feet to
one foot (to existing building) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions to
the side (east) setback from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero feet
(to existing pavement), a reduction to required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (114
spaces) to 4.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet (100 spaces), a deviation to locate a problematic use
contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel and a deviation to locate a problematic use within a
building which does not meet all of the current land development regulations and building
regulations, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
704.L and (2) to permit a reduction to the landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north)
from 15 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Hercules
Avenue (west) from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer
along Rogers Street (south) from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero
feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from
five feet to one foot (to existing building) and a reduction to the width of the required foundation
landscaping adjacent to the building from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape
Program, under the provisions of Section 3-l202.G for the site at 2001-2021 Gulf to Bay
Boulevard and 511 South Hercules Avenue, with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913 and the Comprehensive Landscape Program per
Section 3-1202.G.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the applicant (Ace America Cash Express) buyout the lease ofR & W Pawn and Jewelry,
apply for City building permits for interior renovations and for site improvements, and obtain
required FDOT Access Permits by August 17, 2004. Failure to accomplish all three items
within this time frame shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the CDB to be null
and void and cause enforcement action to be initiated again. Failure by the applicant to
diligently and timely pursue the issuance of, and completion of, required building permits for
the purpose of issuing an Occupational License for Ace America Cash Express after
completion of those improvements, shall be grounds to deem the Flexible Development
approval null and void and also cause enforcement action to be initiated again.
2. That a Comprehensive Sign Program be submitted by August 17, 2004. The Comprehensive
Sign Program shall include both freestanding and attached signage. Shopping center
freestanding signage shall be reduced to a height acceptable to the Planning Department, have
consistent color, have consistent tenant message panels and individual lettering and have the
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17, 2004 - Case FLD2003-10055 - Page 8
.
.
site address revised to be read horizontally. The day care center freestanding sign height shall
be acceptable to the Planning Department, be consistent in color as the shopping center
freestanding signage and shall include the site address. Attached shopping center signage shall
have a consistent color of background panels and individual lettering. All necessary sign
permits shall be obtained by October 17, 2004, to effect changes approved under the
Comprehensive Sign Program; and
3. That the double dumpster enclosure be consistent in materials and color as the principal
building.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
\ IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending cases I Up for the next CDB I Gulf to Bay 2001-2021 Ace America's Cash Express
(C) I Gulf to Bay 2001-2021 Staff Report.doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17, 2004 - Case FLD2003-10055 - Page 9
.
.
Location Map
Owner:
Roma Square. Inc..
I
I Case:
FLD2003-10055
Site:
2001 - 2021 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd.. &
511 S. Hercules Avenue
, Property
Size (Acres) :
1.98
PIN:
13/29/15/57690/000/0010
13/29/15/57690/000/0030
13/29/15/57690/000/0060
13/29/15/57690/000/0080
13/29/15/57690/000/0090
13/29/15/57690/000/0110
298B
Atlas Page:
f~n!o
I -,
I I
r~~~~4~
:__-td
,
,
.
n,
, ,
, ,
~ --'
CG
I I
I,
,.1 ..-
~__4_1 ~
~
----I
:~
, I
. I,
I I
'--4il
, I-I
~I I.
,. "
'T" ~
~-------1
RH--~'
-
- - -, I.'
en ~";Ol '.:
)). ~-:
c::
:0
o
~
)).
~
;------,
405 I
~Z~I~__,
~~
411
: :CG:~
I I
I I
I , ,--I
" I r--- '---.
L I I I
~-=--_.._: :_~-----_:
~ ~
GULJ - TO-BA Y J;ll \In
,-' -,
I ----I
, ,
..___I "--I
, ,
_ ~.... -'-1_ __ ___ _.. - -_:
Owner: I
Site:
I
I
I
I
....----...
-------
I
I
, _I
-,
,
, .
, .
, 0
, 0
.
'-.. 1-'
~..____I
.
400
402
-'
INS
~
'l(
CI)
1U
5
o
ffi
:t:
CI)
- n C(;
8
~----.._-
-, I
: I
INS In ~ -;
~irt 111
:, - : 40<'
..I I I
I 1___1
'.
.- .. 402
lIlLn
, ,
CI) ~~---'
o
:0 405 __
~
)).
~
:---~ 404
I I
I I
I I 406
I I
I I
I I 408
'--_..! Aln
~gggoooo
g (Iq <"'l t't ~ C\i C>i ~
"
, -
~~--I
~9 :
:,,, '
:-CG:
'--,- - -,--
c
i3
'"
1'l
'"
'" "-
~;--~---
~: e>i
I
I
,
o
,
,
,
,
,
,----- ------------ ---
,
,
,
,
,
,
,- -
I" y-
o
,
,
,
I
R/OG
575
"
, "
, "
<: IN~>
601 I ~,...
'''j .......
;.;T
Br;)
'" ~
..
&
~u
I-
I
I
,
: ~o
Future Land Use Map
Roma Square. Inc..
2001 - 2021 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd., &
511 S. Hercules Avenue
i Case:
Property
Size (Acres) :
PIN:
i
i Atlas Page:
.
311 : I : :
313 I I ^ : -1.12:
~~.---' ';[,7 \i--j
J17 ~
~ ~~-:-::j-i VJt/-';
--. I GIj c.; I
D:J '<1~'
c:: ~:~:
(I) ,': '----~
)). o' CG--:
fit '--I ~ :----~
I I I I
I I I .
I I I I
1 ~ I I
~ ~--~ :__J
'"
GULF- TO-SA Y SL VD
'"
~
~
'"
" Q
'" '"
;!; ;!;
'" '"
I---~---~
I
CG
,
1______------
-~'---------I_..
, "
,
, ,
I
RH
I
I
I '
- - __ __I
~ - --
~-------_._-
.
:'
,
~
RFI
CI) ~
a::~
~
o 323
c::
:O~
-< CG
)).-
fit
c
"-
~
r _1- --
--------
o
,
,
I
I
I
I
.
j"1......-=....'!II.-=.....'C.
I
--------
:\' ,
,...''. ,_ _I ::- --'..
, ..' 'lit I I
: 'n,,,,,,_~
\. .......:' ~~---.. C'l
,..__~\'O".:>o'r
~'
~a4
. I
I_} I
,,7$ ;
I
I~ II
1-1_~t8
r -- 1
, I
:~ c~o
1- -I_
I :
168~_~-
FLD2003-10055
1.98
I---~
: I~
6"fr'--'
,- ,
13/29/15/57690/000/0010
13/29/15/57690/000/0030
13/29/15/57690/000/0060
13/29/15/57690/000/0080
13/29/15/57690/000/0090
13/29/15/57690/000/0110
298B
,..
L
.
L_ __ , -'
f;n~08 ,-- '- , .-------1
, '. , :
" " :- -- ,- - 30i
, , :n, ~ , , OM -----
-
---I r:.1f1) 1!: I
' , -:-:;iil?
' , 400
: - - ~ ' -
,- ,
: __4dI ~ IJffJS.! ~_. 402
"
, , 0 ~
: 40~ 405 ,
, , ~? I't_~ q: ---.----
-- . " ~
, ' , ~
, '--4io
,
:b 411
~ ..,J ,
, , ~::~ ;:) ,
, , 0 - --.
,
, ,
i~ , .--, m
' , " r--- '---.
r.J L_ . , ,
-",-4-1 ~ L~____I :-:i------: :5
~ '" ~ -Iil-n---- ---------
GULF- TO-BA Y BL VD CI)
~gggoc~o
o C't <'I <'I C't <'I C't C'l
C
'"
-, ,
,
: 1(21.___
') :_~~~~~n
~--1
, -
, ,
, ,
-~__710
-,
, ,
", I 4011
.1 , ,
I, : 1_ __I
,. ~ 402
::0 405
c::
CI)
:b
rii
.-- -,
I ,404
_ _ I I
, ,
, '4()(j
, ,
, ,
. I 408
'.__..! 41n
k~--~
t09 '
~, '
[~ - - - -.-J
'. -.'
c
'"
c
'"
,
,
I _~
~
'"
~. - ~m
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,----- ------------ ---
,
,
,
,
,
,
~-----~
,-------
,
-,
,
,
,
,
,
.
.
.'
,
,
,-----
,.
-,
,
,
,
,
,
.-' --
:-. - ~ ---.
, ,
.. --,
,
-' -I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
,-.
;,", ;--~
r-------------------. I I
~_,~~-m mm nm_~ :
______C-_-___-_-: - ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~1 t ---=j
--------_:-~---------------_: ,:: :
, . ,
___________________________, I I I
--------~-:---------------~ ;~==U ~--'
----------------------------': :
, '
'-------~
o
575
"
, '-
: ...............
,
601 . .
, .
,
", - ,
,
.
T
.
311
,
;,
,
~
313
, ,
, ,
: .:!11~
CI)
~
~
c::
CI)
:b
rii
,
, ,
;:--~ ~ ,_~n:l
I~--I
:, '''-r' '0~~~ ~
I ,,^ \ ~
~ ; _!. 1~-==
, I, ______1 -<: ----
:b c---
__n_ rii
'.
,
,
,
, ,
, ,
1_- -'
I --I
, ,
, ,
, ,
, -
~ ~ --~
'"
'"
...
C
'"
'----
GULF- TO-BA Y BL VD
~
'"
t.l Cl
~ ~
'" '"
~
'"
~ _.- - -
,
,-
,
,
,
,
,
,
1______------
,
,
,
,
,
. --. - _1-" I
I
--------
,
,
,
,
~ ri} I-~---------I--:.l
'" ~ ,
., ,
g>
l!C '
~HDR:
I i -- - - -. I
: ~ - - - -_:
"
, :
,
: "'~4
'- ,
: ~O
;
Zoning Map
Owner:
Roma Square, Inc..
Site:
2001 - 2021 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd.. &
511 S. Hercules Avenue
Case:
Property
Size (Acres) :
PIN:
A tlas Page:
,
,
,
,
i"....'"-:.':':.~-:.~
. - --
---------.--
.'.\' ,
/'\ :-_1 ::---'-
, \ 'tll
. 'n.",.. ~
{, ....,> -~---"-C'>l
"6'ro'
r--"
, '
-' ,
;r-. /lj rn ~__~4
6~1'" -LJ ~_n,:
1--1_ 1_1_~t8
, '
I I-I
68L~
'-._~
: JE'L
: '
n
6~'r' I
'- ,
, ,
i ---I
. ,
~~ ,J?
FLD2003- 10055
1.98
13/29/15/57690/000/0010
13/29/15/57690/000/0030
13/29/15/57690/000/0060
13/29/15/57690/000/0080
13/29/15/57690/000/0090
13/29/15/57690/000/0110
298B
.
f~-jje ac ed'-iw jij----~:
'. 311~' ,Dg
-'
Place of
worship
---I
: :, _ ~-4Op_ (I) '.~. ~;~_I I I
: - - ~
l. . ~ : ;.. ~_~
:~~~ ~ ~-, 4<Y2 ~
:~~0405 I ~
: .; ~ ~2!~'~Orfice 'II:(
'--;;io ::b. 411 m
'" .....,
n;: : AUtom ~fjle ---, :
. I 1_ -4 ~ffic~ sefVic,e ffi R~tiil sales
-~.-' ~ '!----. ~tatioit::t: -~------- ---------
GULF-TO-BA Y BLVD CI)
400
,
____i::--(::learwater
! i HiglfSchool
~_____~ _, ~'
: .
. .
, .
, ,
.
I ,-'
'.. - ---
,- ~ '- I
I ----I
, ,
. _ _ -. . --,
,
-,- -
_.. . _ _ -' i _ _ _ .. _.. _ _ _ _ _ ~
j"~ j"-~
..__________________1 I I I
I II I
~___________________~: I
- - : I
, , ,
----~-----------.- ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~i ~; ~ - ~j
-.. I I I I
--.. - - - - - _: '- - - ---.. -.... - - --- -' " : :
, . ,
----_______________________, I, I
_________:-:________n___nj- ;;:=U ~--'
,. '
---------------------------- I I
, .
~------~
~:s:s:Socco
8 t"'l C'<l C'<l C'<l ~ C'l C"t
'"
.
-. .
.
r __,
, -
, ,
, ,
"~__~lO
I .---. ---
:1<21.___ :::: ~
CI) ; :a1t~4 h~-~~
(') __ __n_n
$ Dwel i~~
" -- - I I
S ~~~__I I : 406
v, ~09 I . I 408
).. _:Ul: '----1 dIll
iii Aut~~_ijbilf
service
~atip~
311 I I
313 : \ i:::.! V\-mL
-lJ.5..1 I . I
317 _ __: :~, ,~ l~
.' 00..1./>0.. 0>,'__
i r~~jJC~'ii/; ~'--
OJ r':- : ~ ; _ 323
c: ,'. . .'f:
en :: :----~ ,g
~ . T~e~I~-
111 :--::, s~Tes iii
, ,
Re ta1lr~~ti
~ I__J
c
"-
c
'"
-
GULF- TO-BA Y BL VD
Il
'"
'" "-
~---~---
c' c
~: ~
'" " Q
:!; '" '"
'" :!; :!;
'" '"
~
'"
r _1- --
,
.-
,
,
n:Mot~1
,
.
,----- ------------ ---
,
.
I 1--
Site:
2001 - 2021 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd" &
511 S. Hercules Avenue
,- ,
..-. I
, ,
.
~_)I
Vacant
575
,-
~ia~e-9{
60)Vp~bitl;
l"j .....
iRet if salesn------
,
.
1______------
,
,
,
,
'--..--I-~ 1
~--------------------..
"'~,
~ i: :-Att~~h~ i
~ I 1 I
~ : ; Dwellings:
I I I :
, , ,
, , ,
I 1 I . :
: : ~.. __ - _: 1
,
- - --
....------_.__ 1
,
:---~---~-------_____J
Veh{:cIe
,
sales:
.
,
.1...........................
__-"',~\:n:... i :---c
: '--''''''-~
\ ....,~>. -~- --~ C'<j
~
-' ,
. '.
: 1 .-.. :___~4
: n.... ..l. ::. I'"'
:_,~- acn~ (jwe ~!lfM
:-' : : ,:: /-=-:-:
: ~o 68l_.! ~~ J2
:---i
1 IS'L
: .
00
6~-r1 I
,- .
,
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Owner:
Roma Square, Inc..
Case:
FLD2003-10055
Property
Size(Acres) :
1.98
PIN:
13/29/15/57690/000/0010
13/29/15/57690/000/0030
13/29/15/57690/000/0060
13/29/15/57690/000/0080
13/29/15/57690/000/0090
13/29/15/57690/000/0110
298B
! Atlas Page:
i
e
ie
..
Aerial Map
Owner:
Ramo Square, Inc..
Case:
FLD2003-10055
Site:
2001 - 2021 Gulf-ta-Bay Blvd., &
511 S. Hercules Avenue
Property
Size (Acres) :
1.98
PII\J:
13/29/15/57690/000/0010
13/29/15/57690/000/0030
13/29/15/57690/000/0060
13/29/15/57690/000/0080
13/29/15/57690/000/0090
13/29/15/57690/000/0110
298B
A tlas Page:
---
-
,
~ .- ~
'Vi,~w looking west along frontage of Gulf to Bay Blvd
'!
'di.l o.~"I..."IiIt ,: .... . ...,... __.-0
.~ lIr.:"'t -
..Jll' . - ili ' ,
~- -..' '--- '
-~~_._" . ~.~
1E~;..........,.h..;.................
'-' F"<
:d,. ~-;: :'
"
"t::
r '",~
Viev' looking east of west side of shopping center
2001-2021 Ciulfto Bav Boulevard
.:
5 I Jl South Ilercules i\venue
'f~'L'I)')()()3 10' ()-5
_.' _.......". - ...).
-
\'ie\\' of north :.;idi;~
Bay Boulevard
"
I
View looking e:ast along frontage of Gulfto Bay Blvd
j
__",..-~\.'r~>" .--.-
._-~
---
Vitw of south side of shopping center from Rogers St
~li!~w of Canterbury Oaks apaltments southeast of
subject property at Rogers St
;i~';
.. .
Vievr of Clean :vater High Seh across S. Hercules Ave
2001-2021 G-ulf to Bay I-{oulevard
:; 1 J' South I-Icrcules l\venue
FLD2003-10055
e
.11"
J~;<:
~~
View of southeast corner of shopping center at
Rogers St
.-/
\ie\\ of vacant propert~ south of Rogers St on
S. Ilercules ~j\ ve
View of commercial prOJ01ties acr(l~W Gulf to Bay I.Hvd
2
\ ; f
e
:i
-r'
;1
~I-
..~" ;
Vit w looking north of shopping center fi-ontage along
;~:, Hercules Avenue
View of west side of shopping center facing
S Hercules Ave
Vie',,y .)f south side of day cafe center Hlcing Rogers St
2001-2021 G-ulf to Bav Boulevard
.I
511 South lIercules Avenue
FI~1)2003-1 0055
.-..~_.-.
(
I
I
1--
~ ,I II
.L.U~-
..
{t.: : :~,~~~:,:":,:l_;_~;_ .,~, -
~;':'::-'::~;';-,:,L:'';'''''..L.._,..i1ili<-' ,.'-
C~-:----::;.,
,ie\y lookin,g 110fth (yf da( care center il'ontage along
S _, Hercules i-\. Vt'lnl.;'~
>e:::.;.."
I,' Iilp ~;.-
.~ ... ~~ii' .~ f1
__a -~ r~ ____
:Olr-( - _r.-. - - "':"'''<_~~.~ ',~:':,;;~_", ':,~ -
"
\ic,y ohvest side of da:;, care centl,~r f~lcing
'~ I-IcTcldes Ave
3
e
#-'-......,
~~~it
~"."m.7...'
.,
,
Vie w of east side of shopping center sign on Gulf TO
B (I" Eoulevard
..
!
\~r
I
---
--------~-
Vifw of east side of shopping center sign at
mtersection of Gulf to Bay Blvd and S. Hercules Ave
~- :
"
Y';
'c:::: ~ .'-
.. . .
" '......
..~~ .
. '" v .' '.
.~-
"
.-t- - ____
. .,
View of day care center sign on S. Hercules Ave
2001..2021 (julfto 13ay Boulevard
511 South I-IerculesAvenue
FIJ)2003-10055
e
..~
mIlimII~'"
l.'fIJI."ht'.J
.....".'-~.<....;'"
Vie\v cfwesl side of shor ping center sign on Gulf to
Bay Boulevard
, .:1;,11, mii\:iirlt~1!!lh~i!lilr.
d..... .~.(rj:.!: .-:7'iX'lI
, ~.
,.:i\I:"IH _
CAK'DS
.(":'\', l-l\~;l
I ;0-,,( ': \ r,tj'
~>, ~I...~cr\~
,.;,;"", ~
Vie\\ ofvvest side of shupping center sign at
LlJll~Tsec,tion of Gulf to Bay Blvd and S. Hercules Ave
4
LL
.
.,,....
, ,1
o
>-
f-
-
o
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: E~ n~L..~ 1
FAX: ". ~ ~ 7 -z...+,. ~ k1Ll1
Phone: f 2-4- ~ B + z- 2-
FROM: \^} \'A...A~ \J t\ \~ . Phone:_
DATE:~ "2-) ,\ RE: . Ft-P "'UIc~ - \ b~SS-
~ S~v~
MESSAGE:
p W-~"j A-~\ ",.:$ ',~
)
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) JQ.
",.".J11
\
RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME 02/11/2004 12:13
NAME PLAt"
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
DATE,TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
02/11 12: 08
97248505
00:04:07
10
OK
STANDARD
ECM
.
.
Permit Plan Case History
2005 GULF TO BAY BLVD
BIZ2003-01217
4/14/2003
Banner across window of business
Initial Inspection
No violation found.
NVO
MJF
4/14/2003
No Violation Found
MJF
No violaition found
4/1 0/2003
Complaint Received
LP
CDC2002-01305 zoning violation.
Reinspection
LTG
10/13/2003 Reinspection
No change, no application.
10/13/2003 Notice to Appear
NT A issued manager of store, Raymond Meyers, signed for it.
Landoe, 111 8th Ave, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10011.
9/17/2003 Written Warning
10 day written warning, signed by store manager.
12/26/2002 Reinspection
Application not completed.
JLH
JLH
I also sent a copy of the NTA to Eugene
JLH
JLH
11/26/2002
Send NOV
L P
11/26/2002
Notice of Violation
LP
11/25/2002 Initial Inspection
Photos of business taken. No OCL for business.
no application.
11/20/2002 Complaint Received
JLH
Zoning has been trying to work with them since June, still
JLH
COD1997-01457 U-HAUL RENTAL TRUCK PARKED IN PARKING LOT BY STREET
10/1/1997 Reinspection
no U-Haul trucks
CMP
JDK
10/1/1997
Voluntary Compliance
JDK
9/25/1997
Complaint Received
CAB
9/19/1997 Initial Inspection JDK
SPOKE TO OWNER WILL GET APPROVALS, WILL MOVE TRUCKS IN THE MEANTIME.
COD1997-01464 VEHICLE SIGNAGE
CMP
.
.
COD1997-01464 VEHICLE SIGNAGE
9/25/1997 Complaint Received
CMP
CAB
9/19/1997 Initial Inspection
VEHICLE SIGN REMOVED, COMPLIED.
9/19/1997 Voluntary Compliance
JDK
JDK
COD1997-01595 VEHICLE SIGNAGE AFTER VERBAL WARNING
1012/1997 Reinspection
CMP
JDK
10/2/1997
Corrected by Owner
JDK
10/111997
Complaint Received
CAB
9/30/1997 Initial Inspection
SEND N.O.V. REMOVED BY 10/4/97
JDK
9/30/1997
Notice of Violation
JDK
COD1997-01904 U-HAUL TRUCK BACK OUT BY ROAD.
10/23/1997 Reinspection
truck removed, per Clem getting rid ofU-Haul contract
CMP
JDK
10/23/1997
Complaint Received
CAB
10/23/1997
Corrected by Owner
JDK
10/22/1997 Initial Inspection
TRUCK WAS BACK OUT 10/21. CHECK FOR ZONING. MS WILLIAMS CALLED ABOUT A
MONTH AGO BUT DID'NT DO ANYTHING ABOUT GETTING A OCL OR CUP. GAVE ATTACHED
WRITTEN WARNING AND INFORMED CLEM THE PROPERTY MANAGER(725-1267.
COD1997-02036 BANNER ON VEHICLE
10/9/1997 Reinspection
COMPLIED.
JDK
CMP
JDK
10/9/1997
Voluntary Compliance
JDK
10/7/1997 Initial Inspection JDK
LARGE DODGE TRUCK OUT BY ROAD WIBANNER ON SIDE. SPOKE TO PROPERTY MANAGER
CLEM AND SENT ATTACHED LETTER. (ALREADY SENT N.O.V.)
10/7/1997 Complaint Received CAB
COD1997-02149 U-HAUL TRUCK PARKED AT SITE W/O PROPER PERMIT OR OCL
1116/1997 Reinspection
CMP
JDK
2
.
.
COD1997-02149 U-HAUL TRUCK PARKED AT SITE W/O PROPER PERMIT OR OCL CMP
TRUCK STILL THERE. ISSUED ATTACHED NTA CHECKED BACK LATER AND TRUCK WAS
GONE. REMOVED/COMPLIED.
11/6/1997 Notice to Appear JDK
11/6/1997
Corrected by Owner
JDK
11/5/1997 Initial Inspection
TOOK PHOTOS, WROTE UP NT A
11/5/1997 Complaint Received
JDK
JDK
COD1997-02330 "SINV" REQUEST FOR SIGN INVENTORY FOR EACH OCCUPANCY IN
SHOPPING CENTER
5/5/1998 Research Records
CMP
MKF
"FACE CHANGE" REGISTRATION CHECKLIST ISSUED BY CENTRAL PERMITTING (DON
MELONE). TOTAL ATTACHED ALLOWED FOR OCCUPANCY = 22.5 SQUARE FEET. CURRENT
TOTAL ATTACHED SIGN AREA = 22.5 SQUARE FEET.
5/5/1998 Voluntary Compliance MKF
---COMPLIED---
4/2/1998 Sign Survey
CONDUCTED SIGN INVENTORY W/ INSPECTOR BOHR.
2/13/1998 Phone Call MKF
CONTRACTOR HAS MADE ARRANGEMENTS FOR MEETING W /DON MELONE (OF CENTRAL
PERMITING) TO CORRECT ERRONEOUS "NO FEE" PERMITS.
2/4/1998 Phone Call MKF
CONTACTED CONTRACTOR. STRESSED TO HIM THE IMPORTANCE OF MEETING W/DON
MELONE(CENTRAL PERMITTING) TO CORRECT THE ERRONEOUS PERMITS. WAS ASSURED
THAT HE WOULD CONTACT DON ASAP. A FAMILY EMERGENCY KEPT HIM FROM MAKING
THE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MEETING.
2/4/1998 Reinspection MKF
MKF
1/30/1998 Meeting w/City Official MKF
MET WITH PERMITTING SPECIALIST (DON MELONE) FOR STATUS OF CORRECTIVE ACTION
PERTAINING TO ERRONEOUS PERMITS. WAS INFORMED THAT CONTRACTOR NEVER
ARRIVED FOR SCHEDULED MEETING. WILL ATTEMPT TO CONTACT CONTRACTOR MYSELF
AND SEE TO IT THAT HE COMES IN TO CORRECT PERMITS AND DRAWINGS.
1/22/1998 Research Records MKF
RESEACH INDICATES PERMITS MAY HAVE BEEN ISSUED IN ERROR FOR SHOPPING CENTER.
HAVE INFORMED PERMITTING SPECIALIST THAT ISSUED THEM AND HE HAS CONFIRMED
THE ERROR. HE WILL SCHEDULE MEETING WITH CONTRACTOR FOR DISCUSSION OF
CORRECTIVE ACTION TO BE TAKEN.
1/20/1998 Phone Call MKF
RECEIVED PHONE CALL AND E-MAIL FROM VIC CHODORA REQUESTING AN ONSITE
INSPECTION OF SIGNAGE FOR THIS LOCATION AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY MANAGER.
1/20/1998 Reinspection MKF
CONDUCTED ONSITE INSPECTION WITH INSPECTOR BOHR. WE HAVE CONCERNS BASED
ON VISUAL INSPECTION; WILL RESEARCH RECORDS FOR EVALUATION OF DRAWINGS AND
PERMITS.
~
.
.
COD1997-02330 "SINV" REQUEST FOR SIGN INVENTORY FOR EACH OCCUPANCY IN
SHOPPING CENTER
1/2/1998 Reinspection
CMP
MKF
CONTRACTOR WILL BE PROVIDING DRAWINGS OF PROPOSED SIGNAGE TO CENTRAL
PERMITTING. STEVE DOHERTY HAS DETERMINED THAT A BLDG. PERMIT WILL BE
REQUIRED FOR THE STRUCTURAL AWNING, BUT EACH SIGN ON THE AWNING WILL BE
PLACED VIA "NO FEE" PERMITS.
11/25/1997 Initial Inspection MKF
MET W/CONTRACTOR ON-SITE. EXPLAINED REQUIREMENT FOR "FACE CHANGE"
REGISTRATION CHECKLIST TO BE SUBMITTED FOR EACH OCCUPANCY RECEIVING NEW
SIGNAGE.
11/25/1997 Complaint Received MKF
COD1997-02372 VEHICLE SIGN
12/4/1997 Monitor Location
VEHICLE UP BY STORE/COMPLIED BUT WILL MONITOR.
CMP
JDK
12/4/1997
Voluntary Compliance
JDK
12/3/1997 Initial Inspection JDK
GAVE ANOTHER WARNING HAVE ALREADY TICKETED ONCE. MOVED WHILE I WAS THERE.
MONITOR.
12/3/1997 Complaint Received JDK
COD1997-02571 VEHICLE SIGN-VEHICLE PARKED ADJACENT TO GULF TO BAY AFTER CMP
NUMEROUS WARNINGS.
12/23/1997 Reinspection JDK
VAN NOT BY ROAD. NEW OWNER JOHN OF ADCO PRINTING CALLED (353)588-2800. HAVE
NOT BEEN ABLE TO REACH.
12/23/1997 Corrected by Owner JDK
12/19/1997 Reinspection
VAN STILL THERE, CALLED AND LEFT MESSAGE WITH PROPERTY MANAGER.
12/19/1997 Notice to Appear
FOR $80.
12/18/1997 Reinspection
WROTE AN NTA FOR $80. AT 10:50 A.M.
12/17/1997 Initial Inspection
VAN WAS BY THE STREET AT 10:30 A.M. AND 3:00 P.M.
12/17/1997 Complaint Received
JDK
JDK
JDK
JDK
JDK
COD1998-01776 No 0.1.
7/6/1998 Reinspection
at location 6/3/98 sign in window moving 6/10/98 - at location 7/6/98 business has moved.
OB
BLS
4
.
.
COD1998-01776 No 0.1.
7/6/1998 Out Of Business
5/12/1998 Initial Inspection
At location-sign in window closed Mon& Fri. will re-check.
5/12/1998 Complaint Received
FLD2002-08025 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT AS A COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO ALLOW A PROBLEMATIC USE TO BE
WITHIN 500' SEPERATION DISTANCE ET AL
1/14/2003 Application Withdrawn
application deadline of 12/26/02 was not met. taking to code board for non-compliance to CDC.
8/22/2002 Amendment Application Received
8/22/2002
Application received
OB
BLS
BLS
BLS
WIT
JVS
JVS
JVS
FLD2003-10055 Flexible Development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in the Commercial REC
District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard
from 25 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (west)
setback along Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement),
reductions to the front (south) setback along Rogers Street from 25 feet to one foot
(to existing building) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement),
reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building)
and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to required
parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (114 spaces) to 4.4 spaces per 1,000
square feet (100 spaces), a deviation to locate a problematic use contiguous to a
residentially zoned parcel and a deviation to locate a problematic use within a
building which does not meet all of the current land development regulations and
building regulations, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-704.L and (2) to permit a reduction to the landscape buffer
along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement),
a reduction to the landscape buffer along Hercules Avenue (west) from 10 feet to
zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Rogers
Street (south) from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero
feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east
property line from five feet to one foot (to existing building) and a reduction to the
width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five
feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of
Section 3-1202.G.
Documents attached in PPlan
Zoning Review WW
See Conditions.
Site Visit
Solid Waste Review
How is solid Waste handled? All Dumpsters must be enclosed.
'i
.
e
FLD2003-10055 Flexible Development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in the Commercial REC
District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard
from 25 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (west)
setback along Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement),
reductions to the front (south) setback along Rogers Street from 25 feet to one foot
(to existing building) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement),
reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building)
and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to required
parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (114 spaces) to 4.4 spaces per 1,000
square feet (100 spaces), a deviation to locate a problematic use contiguous to a
residentially zoned parcel and a deviation to locate a problematic use within a
building which does not meet all of the current land development regulations and
building regulations, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-704.L and (2) to permit a reduction to the landscape buffer
along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement),
a reduction to the landscape buffer along Hercules Avenue (west) from 10 feet to
zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Rogers
Street (south) from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero
feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east
property line from five feet to one foot (to existing building) and a reduction to the
width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five
feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of
Section 3-1202.G.
Verify Traffic Impact Fees
Drainage Calculation Recd
D.O. Mailed Out
2/17/2004 CDB Meeting WW
2/1/2004 Letter To Abutting Prop Owner WW
I/27/2004 Landscaping Review AD
see conditions
1/7/2004 Traffic Eng Review SR
()
.
e
FLD2003-10055 Flexible Development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in the Commercial REC
District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard
from 25 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (west)
setback along Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement),
reductions to the front (south) setback along Rogers Street from 25 feet to one foot
(to existing building) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement),
reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building)
and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to required
parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (114 spaces) to 4.4 spaces per 1,000
square feet (100 spaces), a deviation to locate a problematic use contiguous to a
residentially zoned parcel and a deviation to locate a problematic use within a
building which does not meet all of the current land development regulations and
building regulations, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-704.L and (2) to permit a reduction to the landscape buffer
along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement),
a reduction to the landscape buffer along Hercules Avenue (west) from 10 feet to
zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Rogers
Street (south) from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero
feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east
property line from five feet to one foot (to existing building) and a reduction to the
width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five
feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of
Section 3-1202.G.
a) Remove first two driveways immediately east of the SR60 and Hercules Avenue intersection to improve
Level of Service along Gulf To Bay Blvd. and provide more connection spacing between a driveway and
traffic signal (min. 125'.) See Section 3-102 D. Community Development Code. DONE
b) Provide more parking utilizing the added space gained from the removal of the two driveways. DONE
c) Three consecutive driveways along Hercules A venue results in safety concerns for the many conflict
points. This portion of the parking area needs to be redesigned to minimize conflict points. This could
provide more parking spaces that comply with the parking stall standards. GULF COAST CONSULTING
TO SUBMIT A NARRATIVE JUSTIFYING THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION.
d) All Handicapped stalls must comply with the current City standards i.e. there must not be any obstacles in
the 5'xI9' handicapped aisle such as ramps. Handicapped aisle must be flush with sidewalk and ramp must
start at the wings of the sidewalk as shown on the City details. DONE
e) All removed driveways must match existing curbs and sidewalks. DONE
f) A minimum of four handicap parking spaces must be provided for the current number of parking spaces.
DONE
g) Compact parking not acceptable for required parking calculations. CPMP ACT SPACES REDESIGNED
TO MEET CITY STANDARDS
h) Show 20' x20' sight visibilty triangles for driveway on Rogers Street. DONE
i) Show loading zone exclusive of parking spaces and drive aisles.DONE
j) All of the above must be submitted prior to CDB. DONE
k) Prior to building permit, submit a FDOT permit for construction along State right of way and adhere to
there conditions.
1/712004 Land Resource Review R A
See Conditions
12/2212003 Map Created WW
12/4/2003 Legal Review WW
N/A
12/4/2003 CRT Review WW
See conditions.
7
.
.
FLD2003-10055 Flexible Development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in the Commercial REC
District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard
from 25 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (west)
setback along Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement),
reductions to the front (south) setback along Rogers Street from 25 feet to one foot
(to existing building) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement),
reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building)
and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to required
parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (114 spaces) to 4.4 spaces per 1,000
square feet (100 spaces), a deviation to locate a problematic use contiguous to a
residentially zoned parcel and a deviation to locate a problematic use within a
building which does not meet all of the current land development regulations and
building regulations, as a Comprehensive fnfill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-704.L and (2) to permit a reduction to the landscape buffer
along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement),
a reduction to the landscape buffer along Hercules Avenue (west) from 10 feet to
zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Rogers
Street (south) from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero
feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east
property line from five feet to one foot (to existing building) and a reduction to the
width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five
feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of
Section 3-1202.G.
11/13/2003 Engineering Review MEL
No comment.
11/13/2003
Park & Rec Review
DWR
No comment since no change to building coverage.
11/12/2003
Letter of Completeness
WW
11/11/2003 DRC Meeting
DRC 12/4/03
WW
11/11/2003 Harbor Master Review
N/A
WW
11/10/2003 Environmental Review
HF
no comments
11/6/2003 Fire Review
NO COMMENTS
DA
11/4/2003
Tree Survey Recd
RA
10/30/2003
Stormwater Review
JK
no comment
10/21/2003
Application received
JVS
OCL-0000514 printing, copies, beepeers and phones, mailboxes, office supplies
1996-97 license issued as control #345621 -license #97-09377.
12/19/1997 Business Closed
OUT OF BUSINESS PER RENEWAL NOTICE.
OB
TAW
R
.
.
OCL-0000514 printing, copies, beepeers and phones, mailboxes, office supplies
1996-97 license issued as control #345621 -license #97-09377.
8/20/1997 Issue License
OB
TAW
8/20/1997 Renewal Notice
TAW
OCL-0006998 NOT A PERMITTED USE WITHOUT CDB - ZONING APPROVAL
Additional Requirements Needed
need zoning approval
Renewal Notice
7/01 BATCH
HLD
Final Renewal Notice
1/02 BATCH
Renewal Notice
FY 02/03 BATCH
Second Renewal Notice
FY2002-2003
Additional Requirements Needed
Zoning approval required, 01-02 renewal fee received, business did not respond to a letter sent 12/13/00
requesting they contact zoning ( Community Development Board application required), ds 12/5/01
Zoning Review
need FLD - comp infill to place problematic use within 500' of another problematic use.
Additional Requirements Needed
Zoning requires CDB Approval, letter sent to business 12/14/00 ds. Application in CRT / GCL hold folder.
7/11/2003 Renewal Notice
03/04
12/6/2002
Phone Call JVS
Returned call to Ernie McKee 727-403-4813 - faxing him a copy of incomplete letter, so he can get missing
items. Fax: 727-726-7462
12/4/2002 Phone Call
spoke with Mike McCullough from ACE ((317)-258-3308. He was getting information about the FLD
process.
12/2/2002 Phone Call
JVS
JVS
spoke with A Susan from the property management company for this property to get a grasp of what exactly
IS gomg on.
11/12/2002 Phone Call
spoke with Kathy at Harry Cline's office and she indicated that they are no longer representing, that Ed
Armstrong may be new representation.
6/20/2002 GCL Letter Sent
JVS
BLS
letter sent to corporate office - stating status of location has been denied per zoning dept. - bls
1/25/2001 Phone Call WBS
Spoke to Joni from the corp. office, she asked if most of their business was from small consumer loans,
would that make a difference with zoning? I asked her what they held as collateral and she didn't know. I
also referred her to the state dept of banking, as a fmanaciallender they would need to apply or register with
that office. She was going to check on these items and speak with our zoning office. ds
<}
.^
.
.
OCL-0006998 NOT A PERMITTED USE WITHOUT CDB - ZONING APPROVAL
11/29/2000 Application received
moved from 1628 Gulf to Bay Blvd, per note on 00/01 renewal notice, old # OCL907564I
OCL9012851 Lie: 04038, Bus phone: (813) 446-1476
Renewal Notice
7 /97 BATCH
HLD
WBS
OB
Renewal Notice
7/98 BATCH
9/23/1998
Business Closed
DAH
out of business per renewal letter
8/21/1997 License Transferred
BUSINESS MOVED TO 1280 SOUTH MISSOURI A VENUE
BLB
Data Date: 2/6/2004
{VW _CASEMAIN_ADDRESS.CSM_ST_NAME} = UpperCase( {?StreetName}) and
{VW _CASEMAIN_ADDRESS.CSM_ST_NMBR} = {?AddressNum}
PropertyHistory2.rpt
10
<'I <'I
0 0
~CJ 0
('.j VJ
~~ --- >
......
~ ......
---
...... 0
......
.....:l
e!l C ~
= II) > ::E
.... II) ..J
...... =>
rI:l => l:Q
.... ...-t ~
~ I
~
C => l:Q r<)
'+-<
=> 0 0
.... M
> 9 l- v
.... ~
...... LL.
~ ~ ..J ~ Cl...
-< ;:) z
:it C) 0
~ Q
rI:l ~ it)
~ fI2 0
U = 0 v ~
U N s::
0 0
Z Z
<'I
0
0
~
r<)
......
---
......
o 13 ,so 5 g ~ '0 .~ ~ f-< .
~'~~~ ~ ~~~b~O ~ Ev ffi v ~
~VJ~~] ~'~1jE;5es ~~~~"8 E~OJ)::E 5 ~g z ~
..c '0 .0 ~ 'tij @ 0.. 8 8 ~ ~ ~ y. 8 0 ~ S< ,;:; 0 ~ "=' 6 -'"
.... -e OJ) v U"J v....CSCl... t:;&r\ V U"J .0 ti..........f-< ~ !ij .c..=i+:l
~lv;~v ~~'m~Uw B~~,~ ~ ~~kCl ~ ~~~
e~~~~1 ]~'~Rf-<~ ~,8~~ ~ ~I]~ ~ g Ueb
;>, ~ v --: CI ~ B ,5 '8 '" ~ c.:l -5 ~ 0.. -5 ~ ,- g U"J '3 Q .... or .s 0.. =a
~ ~ ~ .~ ~ :g Wz ~ 8.,9 ~ 8 ~ '~ ] ,~ (ij g '~ ~,~ g ~ ~ ,so ,g gf-< ~
~E ~o~ u~~~~ bU"J"='~ ~~.......... - ~ 0.. '"
V ,- {:l c;j U J:l g ~ P:E ~ ;Q ~ E=: 9-.g!ij tl ~ -5 ;Q k..s ~ ~ !a "=' ~ ;>,
E ,9 .- ~ .... +=> 0 ~ OJ) !a :::J VJ ,!::;>,::r:..... '@ '!;l a '+-< v '" 0.. V '" ;;s
,~~~,~~~~c;j8'~0..c.:l~oZ8!ij~~~E o..o~~ E '0 ~8~~
U"J .0 5. U"J 8 'S ~ ~ ;>-. ~ v' ........... 0.. 8 "=' 'l1l !f b ..... U ;>, v c:: '0
fS]it~~E~~~J~~e~~~8~ ~~~~ ~ ,~ 1~i
~ t .t:l > ~,~ > v .0 {:l ~ E=: ~ ..!!l g .... C! v ~ !ij @ g VJ :lil ~ E '~'!::
'C: "E; -d "=' !)J ,!:i "=' 'C: -'" ,9 ,- .s ~ R ":l 'l1l gj "=' ..c;;s ..c..... '0 f-< ;; x ..... a v
1:; ,;:< > !ij '-l :.so: 0 i:j +=> > U"J '-' ~ :::l..c ~ ..... ~ 3 ~ ~ U ..... v U"J t:; (ij
o ~ ~ ;>, ,q !a ~ ~ ~] ~ = u: ~ E ~ ~ 5 ~ ..s ~ OJ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g, en
~~~;~~]~~~~lz~~~~c;j~{3~'oBlj::E;bO~ ~,&~
~<~.~~~~i8~~j~~,~-5'~~~lo8~k~~~~,&w~~~ .
~~~~8{:li8~~]l~~1~].~gj~~,~~i~~~!lgZ~~]~~
~~c.:l5d';;0~b;Qf-<v~ ~~!f~~""~'~~8~VJ~VJ; 'o:u08
~::r:~~~~~~~k~~VJ~~~~~l~E<~88~~~]~5~~~8
"='o~- v U"Jv._~O~ j!ij~,,=, "=' 0 -t oVJ~~ ~~o
"2' !ij c;j .0 ~ :r;-..s 'U'.5 .;; 8. ~ f-< CI ~ U"J ..c r;::: 'm '0' 'm Q 6. '@ ~ U ::2 ~ :';:' '@ c;:2' 8 8 z
~
,;.,
:~
u
..:
~
..
u
"<t ::E
8 Cl...
~ ~
1.0
...... 00
;::. 0
<'I PI
0 0
0 0
('.j ('.j
--- ---
...... -
('.j ('.j
--- ---
0 0
,S
~ "'0
v v
';> ..c
::.:: u
u v '"
~~I ~ :t::
OJ) '"
U"J
s:: 15
';:::
v a
v
s:: :::l s::
'So u '"
s:: 0.......
~ Qg:;
0 &r\
-0 00 "<t
<.> 0 ('.j
I- Q <
Q Q
.....:l .....:l
~ ~
;g ~ . . ~
0 p.. i>
N ~ 'S:
-- '=
\0 u
..... 00 ...:
-- ~ 1A
..... '"
u
~lnC
.5 In >
..... Q -I
fl}Qm
.... ...-I
~ M ~
c8m
.;;: N 0
~ 9 ~
Y~-I
-< ~
~:itc)
fI} ?;l:g
C': "c
U UN
~~l
-0
u
I-
~u
c..
o
....
p..
00
s::
'B
= ::s
.s .D
... <
.~ 0
<J E-< ....
fl \) Q.l
~. ~ ~
~O
If)
eM
._ N
.:= <
tl Q
<: .....:l
~
crJ
~
PI
o
~~
--
N
~
~
~
z
o
Q
Q.l
s::
o
Z
{'I
o
o
N
--
N
......
---
......
COI
o
o
N
---
......
N
--
o
'"
'"
Q.l
s::
Q.l
....
Q.l
]-
o
U
'-
o
....
Q.l
~
Q.l
.....:l
o
M
N
<
o
.....:l
~
COI
o
o
NcrJ
~~
--
o
M
o
~ <I
~~
......
......
<I
~
~
z
o
o
~
o
Z
~
p::
M
o
o
N
--
~
......
......
{'I
o
o
N
--
......
N
---
o
COj
o
o
N
--
......
N
---
o
s
o
"'0
~
't;j
~
ci
c:i
"'0
u
Q.l
~
>.
Q.l
c:
::s
crJ
Q.l
Q.l
....
E-<
'<t
'<t
N
<
o
.....:l
~
00
.....
o
<
o
.....:l
~
COI
o
o
!::!~
8~
N
~
~
~
z
o
o
~
o
Z
COI
o
o
!::!
N
N
---
N
COj
o
o
N
---
......
N
---
o
"'0
E
'"
~
u
c..
'"
::E
o
M
......
<
o
.....:l
~
PI
o
o
NcrJ
;:::;>
N......
25
o
~
p::
COI
o
o
N
--
.....
N
--
o
s::
,9
....
'"
"3
u
(;j
U
Q.l
00
~"'O
";J u
.... Q.l
O~
\0
......
o
<
o
.....:l
~
COI
o
o
NcrJ
~C:
--
o
~
p::
PI
o
o
N
--
......
N
--
o
....
u
'"
~
.....
u
S
'"
....
E-<
~'"
.... Q.l
Q.l (l)
>~
If)
......
o
<
o
.....:l
~
~
z
COI
o
~~
~~
--
N
~
~
~
z
o
o
(l)
s::
o
Z
M
o
o
N
--
'<t
--
N
.....
PI
o
o
N
---
.....
N
--
o
~
(l)
';;
(l)
~
(;j
00
(l)
.....:l
o
\0
o
o
o
.....:l
~
'"
6
'~
;;
8
&l
crJ
'<t
8<
~ ~I
--
.....
<
~I
~
z
o
Q
~
o
Z
'<t
o
o
N
---
r-
---
......
COj
o
o
N
--
r-
.....
--
.....
COj
o
o
N
--
.....
N
--
o
~
Q.l
';;
~
Q.l
U
~
o
'"
(l)
~
"8
'"
.....:l
o
If)
o
Q
o
.....:l
~
'5
~
8
o
s::
COI
o
o
!::!~
~ ......1
--
o
~
......1
~
z
o
o
(l)
s::
o
Z
COI
o
o
N
--
o
M
--
o
{'I
o
o
N
--
......
N
--
o
~
(l)
';;
~
....
(l)
....
'"
~
o
....
crJ
o
.....
o
o
Q
.....:l
~
crJ
Z
~
::E
o
u
o
z
M
o
~ <I
::eo
......
......
<I
Q
~
z
o
o
M
'-
o
N
Q.l
1'Jl
Q..
~
o
Z
M
o
o
N
---
\0
--
......
......
COI
o
o
N
--
......
N
---
o
~
(l)
';;
(l)
~
(l)
....
~
o
N
o
o
Q
.....:l
~
, . .
8 :::E "8 ~
0 Q.; b
C"l ~ '"
-- 0 :~
1.0 u t)
- 00 6 ..:
-- <? ~
- <l.l '"
.D U
....
'"
::l
E
'"
E
'"
0-
E
::l
Cl
<
C"-.
"E
::a
!ij
.D
<l.l
11'1
~ vi <Ii
5 '"
:E r') .g 5 '"
0 'p '5
"0 -- :0 'p
'" ~ :e :e ~
N 5 5
'" .- 5
~ ~ Co) u Co) 8 ::$
0 ~ ~ ~ 0
:::c: Cl tn tn '" $:: Z
<'I <'. -.:t <'I <'. r') -.:t r') <'I <'I
0 0 0 0 0 0
p::: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C"l Cj C"l tn 0 ::: C"l ::: N ::: 0 ::: 0 ::: 0 ~I C"l ~ C"l :::
::: -- -- > C"l -- -- N C"l C"l -- --
-.:t ...... .- -- ::: .- ::: C"l ::: -- ::: -- ::: -- 0 :::c: .- :::
Cl .- E-< C"l ...... 1.0 .- C"l ~ 1.0 ~ .- .-
-- -- - -- -- .- - .- -- --
.- 0 -- .- N -- - .-
- - - -
::: ::: ::: tn ::: Cl ~ ~
t>Jl lI'l ::: ::: ::: > ::: <I ~
= ......
..... lI'l
- ~
~
..... .....
~ I
tf'j
,G>~ r')
.....
0
..... M r')
;;. 9 <l.l
..... 11f
- :3 ~ ~ Cl ~ Cl Cl ~ ~
(J ~ 0...
< z 5 ~ z ~ ~ 5 z
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ ~ Cl 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0
~ i
~
U = <l.l ;g <l.l ;g <l.l ~ ~ <l.l ;g ~
U r:: r:: r:: r::
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
z z z z z z z z z Z
-.:t <'. r') <'I <'I <'I
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
~ C"l C"l C"l
C"l C"l -- -- --
-- - -- - 0 -
r-- - -.:t C"l - -
- --
-- C"l -- -- --
-- - 0 - -
N -
-.:t r')
0 0
0 0
N C"l
\0 --
- ~
-- -
- -
<'I <'I PI <'I <'. <'. PI <' I <'I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N ~ N N C"l N N N C"l
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
.- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .-
C"l N C"l N C"l N C"l N C"l
-- 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
0 0 0 0 0 =: 0 0
~ ~
~ '"0 ~ <l.l <l.l
<l.l .;:: .;::
<l.l > <l.l
.;:: <l.l <l.l
~ .;:: .~ p::: p:::
'-' ~ Co) ~ <l.l
~~I eo eo <l.l p::: S ....
~ .... <l.l <l.l
.S ..8 eo .....
<l.l r:: .;:: $:: '"
..... ..... <l.l .S ~ <<l
'" <l.l <l.l .;:: .9 ~ :::E
<<l .-;:: Cl.l <l.l ..... !;-
::: '" :::E :.:E ~ <<l
:> Co) gf Co) 0 ....
'"0 .... '" .::= 0
i:l:l ~ ~ 0.. '2 '"0 .e
.... Cl.l r:: ~
"0 ..... 0 ~ 0 j <<l
tn i:I5 u 0 U N ~ ~
0 0 0 0 1.0 0 C"l -.:t C"l 0
-0 -.:t -.:t lrl -.:t - - .- - -.:t 0\
'-' 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
t- O < < < 0 < 0 0 0 0
:3 0 0 :3 0 :3 0 0 0 :3
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'.".''''''
.,;"'~A...lllf~. ........_.
,'R~~~~~
:,&~,'ll.J~1I!ff~
"nF "',.'..~..
...-::.~ ~
~~. k:..
_-T~ ".1 ~\'
~~~ ....'.,~.~'
"'.... TEQ~..t
...'"u
.
.
Conditions Associated With
FLD2003-10055
2005 GULF TO BAY BLVD
Landscape Curbing Condition
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
01/08/2004
1/8/2004 - (A_D)
The southern half of the property does not show any curbing, adjust plans to meet this condition.
Not Met
11/6/2003 - (A_D)
Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by
the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any
landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall
have a minimum height of six inches above grade.
Landscape 10% Interior Condi1
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
01/08/2004
1/8/2004 - (A_D) Not Met
The plans have an island located along Gulf to Bay (approx. 120' from Hercules) that is less than
8' between curbs, by widening approx. 4' and reducing the nw corner island with the sign by the 4'
you will open the drive to 24' as required and meet this code requirement.
11/6/2003 - (A_D)
Per Section 3-1202.E.1 Code requires a minimum of 10% interior green space of gross vehicular
use area or 12% of gross vehicular use area if parking spaces area greater than 110% of the
required parking. Interior islands shall be designed so that in most cases no more than 10
parking spaces are provided in a row. Interior islands shall be a minimum of 150 sq. ft., and be 8'
of green space from back of curb to back of curb.
Landscape
01/08/2004
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
Plan submitted is much better, however there are still a few minor adjustments from what was
discussed at the last meeting. Since you aren't showing the landscape bed in front of the units in
the north parking lot to somewhat meet the building facade landscape requirement of the code,
plans need to be modified to remove the three (3) spaces within the 15' setback from Rogers St.
and locate the trees accordingly in the planters.
Not Met
11/6/2003 - (A_D)
Having reviewed the proposed plan with traffic engineering, we have several suggestions that will
improve traffic flow and the landscape for the site, while maintaining all the parking, and in fact
adding 5 spaces total per Code for a total of 92 full size spaces. See traffic (Ben Elbo) for plan.
Legal Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW - For CRT Not Met
Occupational License application for this use was reviewed by Zoning, which requires CDB
approval prior to issuance. letter stating such was sent to the business 12/14/00. The
Occupational License application has been in the CRT / OCl hold folder since 12/14/00.
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW - For CRT Not Met
Bob Hall spoke with Leah letice from Johnson Blakely (461-1818) on 11/13/03. He informed her
that this information (filing of this FlD application) is satisfactory for our not issuing citations at this
time. As long as the client does not withdraw the case or fail to bring the property into compliance,
then we will allow the processes to occur. However, once the processes stop toward compliance,
we would need to initiate enforcement again.
Traffic Eng Condition Scott Rice 562-4781
01/07/2004 landscaping at northeast corner of parking lot must be redesigned to provide 24-foot drive aisle. Not Met
Print Date: 01/16/2004
CaseConditons
1 of 3
-"
.
.
FLD2003-10055
2005 GULF TO BAY BLVD
Traffic Eng Condition Scott Rice 562-4781
01/07/2004 Applicant must submit narrative justifying driveway configuration along Hercules Avenue. This is Not Met
an existing arrangement that seperates commercial traffic from daycare traffic and provides for
safe delivery of children to the daycare.
01/07/2004 Applicant to submit narrative justifying limited backout space for parking stalls south of one story Not Met
commercial building. Landscaping was added in this area to provide a safety buffer between these
parking spaces and the daycare playground.
01/16/2004 1/16/04 - S R Not Met
Provide handicap access walkway a minimum of five feet in width from building to the sidewalk
within the Gulf to Bay Blvd. and Hercules rights-of-way.
Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504
01/16/2004 1/16/04 - WW - Still need to revise to include all requests. Not Met
12/4/03 - WW
Revise the application to include all of the requests listed above, including these requests in the
responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria.
01/16/2004 1/16/04 - WW- Need to revise narrative to include additional info. Not Met
12/4/03 - WW
It is strongly suggested to include a narrative as part of the application that explains the primary
reason for the request (problematic use), how Ace America's Cash Express (Ace) will expand its
present square footage to include the existing R & W Pawn Shop tenant space (thereby
eliminating an existing problematic use) and the time frame as to when R & W Pawn Shop will
close and Ace will take over that tenant space (submitting for and obtaining a building permit for
combining the two tenant spaces and completion of the renovation and obtaining a Certificate of
Occupancy). Since Ace has illegally occupied this present location since November 2000 and
there has been longstanding Code enforcement action, it is further suggested that these time
frames be very short. (DRC note: Applicant to provide a timeframe as part of a narrative for
removal of the pawn shop and for submitting for building permits, taking into account buying out
the lease of the pawn shop and length of time to obtain FOOT approval to remove the driveways
on Gulf to Bay Boulevard.)
01/16/2004 1/16/04 - WW - Still needs some work. Not Met
12/4/03 - WW
Provide sign package. Show the location of existing/proposed freestanding signage, including the
existing/proposed setback from the property line(s), and provide the height, area and color of
existing/proposed signage. Include any proposed attached signage. The Comprehensive Sign
Program may be utilized to retain/modify existing signage.
01/16/2004 1/16/04 - WW - Still needs work. Not Met
12/4/03 - WW
Section 6-104.A for nonconforming signs states that "In the event a building permit is required for
the redevelopment of a principal use/structure, or a principal use/structure is vacant for a period of
180 days, signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance by
obtaining a level one approval in accordance with the provisions of Article 4, Division 3." A
building permit will be required for interior remodeling to combine the two tenant spaces for R & W
Pawn and Ace America Cash Express. Additionally, a building permit will be required for the
proposed site improvements. In relation to the above comment "g" regarding signage, what
changes are proposed to existing freestanding and attached signage? At a minimum, the
addresses on the freestanding signs should be reoriented to read horizontally rather than
vertically; those panels on freestanding signs that are not a white background with red lettering
should be changed; and those attached tenant signs that are not on a white background with
individual lettering should be changed.
Print Date: 01/16/2004
CaseConditons
2 of 3
Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504
01/16/2004 1/16/04 - WW - Still needs to show triangles at street intersections. Not Met
12/4/03 - WW
Show the visibility triangles at all driveways, including those for the daycare on Hercules Avenue
and the driveway on Rogers Street, and at the intersections of Gulf to Bay Boulevard/Hercules
Avenue and Hercules Avenue/Rogers Street. Revise the visibility triangles on the landscape plan
to Code size of 20' x 20' and to Code locations.
1/16/04 - WW - Include as condition in D.O. Not Met
12/4/03 - WW
Owner will need to complete and record a Unity of Title document prior to issuance of any building
permits.
1/16/04 - WW - Asked applicant to submit colored reduced plan prior to COB. Not Met
12/4/03 - WW
When resubmitting the application package for the Community Development Board (COB), please
include a reduced landscape plan to scale (8 % X 11), in color, for COB presentation purposes.
1/16/04 - WW - Add as a condition in D.O. Not Met
12/4/03 - WW
Added at the DRC meeting: If there is no formal cross access easement with the property owner
to the east for the access between the two properties close to Gulf to Bay Boulevard, it is
recommended to record a cross access easement. Cross access between properties is a very
important traffic circulation element that improves the level of service for adjacent major
roadways.
. ."
01/16/2004
01/16/2004
01/16/2004
.
Print Date: 01/16/2004
.
FLD2003-10055
2005 GULF TO BAY BLVD
CaseConditons
3 of 3
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Rice, Scott
Wednesday, January 07, 20044:17 PM
Wells, Wayne
Elbo, Bennett
FLD2003-10055
Wayne
I spoke with Robert Pergolizzi of Gulf Coast Consulting regarding the traffic issues that we discussed on the subject
application. He will redesign landscaping at the northeast corner of the parking lot to provide a 24-foot minimum drive aisle
at this location. He is also preparing a narrative to justify the driveway configuration along Hercules and the limited backout
room for the parking spaces south of the one story commercial building. The following conditions were added to Permit
Plan to address these issues.
Landscaping at northeast corner of parking lot must be redesigned to provide 24-foot drive aisle.
Applicant must submit narrative justifying driveway configuration along Hercules Avenue. This is an existing arrangement
that separates commercial traffic from daycare traffic and provides for safe delivery of children to the daycare.
Applicant to submit narrative justifying limited backout space for parking stalls south of one story commercial building.
Landscaping was added in this area to provide a safety buffer between these parking spaces and the daycare playground.
Thanks,
Scott Rice
Land Devel. Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
srice@clearwater-fl.com
1
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Anderson, Duanne
Wednesday, January 07, 20042:13 PM
Wells, Wayne
RE: FLD2003-10055, 2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Roma Square
Wayne,
The one concern that fire is interested in would be the need for 28' ft radius for fire apparatus access from the north, south,
and the north side of the east entry, possibly the south side of that entry as well. The south side of the east entry isn't very
clear to what else is located in that area that may be separating the two (?) drive entries. THANKS!
Duanne
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:20 AM
To: Albee, Rick; Anderson, Duanne; Berry, Bryan; Clayton, Gina; Dittmer, Arden; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Fierce, Lisa; Gerlock, Frank;
Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Mariano, Marc; Melone, Donald; Morris, William; Nicodemus, Sherrie; Parry,
Mark; Reynolds, Mike; Rice, Scott; Richter, Debbie; Schodtler, John; Yellin, Catherine
Subject: FLD2003-10055, 2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Roma Square
DRC Members -
Revised plans have been submitted for the above project. I have placed a copy of the resubmitted documents on top
of the file cabinets outside of Conference Room 216. Please come by and review the resubmitted documents against
your DRC comments (see below). Please revise your comments/conditions in Permit Plan and let me know if they
have complied with your comments/conditions. If a comment/condition was not complied with, but could be included
as a condition on the FLD case for the CDB for the Development Order, please let me know this also.
The bottom line is - can it be scheduled for the next CDB meeting on February 17, 2004?
Please let me know by Monday, January 12, 2004.
Wayne
Case: FLD2003-10055 - 2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
Owner/Applicant: Roma Square, Inc.
Representative: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. (13630 58th Street North, Suite 110, Clearwater,
FL 33760; phone: 727-524-1818; fax: 727-524-6090; email: pergo(aJ,gulfcoastconsultinginc.com
<mailto:pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc. com>).
Location: 1.98 acres located on the south side of Gulf to Bay Boulevard at the intersection with Hercules Avenue.
Atlas Page: 298B.
Zoning: C, Commercial District.
Request: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in the Commercial District with a reduction of
the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction of the
front (west) setback along Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions of the front
(south setback along Rogers Street from 25 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to
existing pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet
to zero feet (to existing pavement), a deviation to locate contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel, a deviation to locate
within a building which does not meet all of the current land development regulations and building regulations and a
reduction of required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (114 spaces) to 3.97 spaces per 1,000 square feet
(90 spaces), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.L and (2) to permit
a reduction of the landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a
reduction of the landscape buffer along Hercules Avenue (west) from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a
reduction of the landscape buffer along Rogers Street (south) from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10
feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction of the landscape buffer along the east property line from five feet
to one foot (to existing building) and from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape
Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.
Proposed Use: Problematic use (check cashing).
1
,",-
.
.
Wells, Wayne
Subject:
Wells, Wayne
Wednesday, January 07,200410:20 AM
Albee, Rick; Anderson, Duanne; Berry, Bryan; Clayton, Gina; Dittmer, Arden; Dougall-Sides,
Leslie; Fierce, Lisa; Gerlock, Frank; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Mariano,
Marc; Melone, Donald; Morris, William; Nicodemus, Sherrie; Parry, Mark; Reynolds, Mike;
Rice, Scott; Richter, Debbie; Schodtler, John; Yellin, Catherine
FLD2003-10055, 2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Roma Square
From:
Sent:
To:
DRC Members -
Revised plans have been submitted for the above project. I have placed a copy of the resubmitted documents on top of
the file cabinets outside of Conference Room 216. Please come by and review the resubmitted documents against your
DRC comments (see below). Please revise your comments/conditions in Permit Plan and let me know if they have
complied with your comments/conditions. If a comment/condition was not complied with, but could be included as a
condition on the FLD case for the CDB for the Development Order, please let me know this also.
The bottom line is - can it be scheduled for the next CDB meeting on February 17, 2004?
Please let me know by Monday, January 12, 2004.
Wayne
Case: FLD2003-10055 - 2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
Owner/Applicant: Roma Square, Inc.
Representative: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. (13630 58th Street North, Suite 110, Clearwater, FL
33760; phone: 727-524-1818; fax: 727-524-6090; email: pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com
<mailto :pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com>).
Location: 1.98 acres located on the south side of Gulf to Bay Boulevard at the intersection with Hercules Avenue.
Atlas Page: 298B.
Zoning: C, Commercial District.
Request: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in the Commercial District with a reduction of the
front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction of the front
(west) setback along Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions of the front (south setback
along Rogers Street from 25 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement),
reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing
pavement), a deviation to locate contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel, a deviation to locate within a building which does
not meet all of the current land development regulations and building regulations and a reduction of required parking from
five spaces per 1,000 square feet (114 spaces) to 3.97 spaces per 1,000 square feet (90 spaces), as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.L and (2) to permit a reduction of the landscape buffer along
Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction of the landscape buffer along
Hercules Avenue (west) from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction of the landscape buffer along Rogers
Street (south) from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and a
reduction of the landscape buffer along the east property line from five feet to one foot (to existing building) and from five
feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.
Proposed Use: Problematic use (check cashing).
Neighborhood Association: Skycrest Association (Elizabeth France, 1629 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone:
727-442-5856; email: eaf5054@earthlink.net<mailto:eaf5054@earthlink.net> ).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson, Rick Albee, Tom Glenn, Arden Dittmer, and Wayne
Wells.
Applicant/Representative: Robert Pergolizzi, Karen Taylor, Ed Armstrong and Sam Colucci
The DRC reviewed this application with the followine: comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No comment since no change to building coverage.
2. Stormwater:
1
.
e
3.
a) No comments.
Traffic Enl!:ineerinl!::
a) Remove first two driveways immediately east ofthe SR60 and Hercules Avenue intersection to improve Level of
Service along Gulf To Bay Blvd. and provide more connection spacing between a driveway and traffic signal (min.
125'.) See Section 3-102 D. Community Development Code. (DRC note: Applicant to investigate closing either the
easternmost or the middle driveway, in addition to westernmost driveway, including a review of the median
opening.)
b) Provide more parking utilizing the added space gained from the removal of the two driveways.
c) Three consecutive driveways along Hercules Avenue results in safety concerns for the many conflict points. This
portion of the parking area needs to be redesigned to minimize conflict points. This could provide more parking
spaces that comply with the parking stall standards. (DRC note: The site plan submitted shows compact parking
adjacent to Gulf to Bay Boulevard due to the sidewalk adjacent to the building "bumping" out two feet about
midpoint of the building. See Comment 3g below. Two options were outlined at the DRC meeting: 1) In order to
provide as much landscaping as possible along Gulf to Bay Boulevard, retain the compact parking; or 2) As
recommended by Arden Dittmer, remove the parking spaces at the two-foot sidewalk "bump out, " making this area
a landscape area [with a potential sidewalk cafe in a portion of this area) and making the compact parking regular
length spaces of 19 feet. Another option is: 3) remove two feet of the sidewalk adjacent to the building to allow the
compact spaces to become regular spaces 19 feet in length adjacent to Gulf to Bay Boulevard. After discussing this
with Frank "Chip" Gerlock, it is preferred to look at options 2 or 3, especially option 2.)
d) All Handicapped stalls must comply with the current City standards i.e. there must not be any obstacles in the 5'x19'
handicapped aisle such as ramps. Handicapped aisle must be flush with sidewalk and ramp must start at the wings of
the sidewalk as shown on the City details.
e) All removed driveways must match existing curbs and sidewalks.
t) A minimum of four handicap parking spaces must be provided for the current number of parking spaces.
g) Compact parking not acceptable for required parking calculations. (DRC note: See comment 3c.)
h) Show 20' x20' sight visibility triangles for driveway on Rogers Street.
i) Show loading zone exclusive of parking spaces and drive aisles.
j) All of the above must be submitted prior to CDB.
k) Prior to building permit, submit a FDOT permit for construction along State right of way and adhere to their
conditions.
General Enl!:ineerinl!::
a) No comments.
Planninl!::
a) Revise the application to include all of the requests listed above, including these requests in the responses to the
General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria.
b) It is strongly suggested to include a narrative as part of the application that explains the primary reason for the
request (problematic use), how Ace America's Cash Express (Ace) will expand its present square footage to include
the existing R & W Pawn Shop tenant space (thereby eliminating an existing problematic use) and the time frame as
to when R & W Pawn Shop will close and Ace will take over that tenant space (submitting for and obtaining a
building permit for combining the two tenant spaces and completion of the renovation and obtaining a Certificate of
Occupancy). Since Ace has illegally occupied this present location since November 2000 and there has been
longstanding Code enforcement action, it is further suggested that these time frames be very short. (DRC note:
Applicant to provide a timeframe as part of a narrative for removal of the pawn shop and for submitting for
building permits, taking into account buying out the lease of the pawn shop and length of time to obtain FDOT
approval to remove the driveways on Gulf to Bay Boulevard.)
c) Revise the application to include all Parcel Numbers for the property:
13/29/15/57690/000/0010 13/29/15/57690/000/0030 13/29/15/57690/000/0060
13/29/15/57690/000/0080 13/29/15/57690/000/0090 13/29/15/57690/000/0110
d) To improve the level of service of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, improve vehicular safety and increase provided parking,
remove two of the existing driveways on Gulf to Bay Boulevard (suggested to retain the easternmost driveway).
(DRC note: See comment 3a under Traffic Engineering.)
e) Provide the width of all proposed landscape islands. Section 3-1202.E.l provides that interior landscape islands
must be a minimum of 150 square feet in area and eight feet wide inside curbing.
t) To improve parking lot design and make the landscape plan more cohesive, it is recommended to eliminate the
existing raised planter adjacent to Gulf to Bay Boulevard (close to Hercules Avenue).
g) The existing main shopping center driveway on Hercules Avenue is not dimensioned, but scales at approximately 39
feet wide. Recommend reducing this driveway down closer to or at 24 feet wide to gain parking and/or interior
landscaping, while not compromising traffic flow.
h) Either pave the existing unpaved employee parking for the daycare to City Code or remove parking from the area
shown adjacent to Hercules Avenue. Provide protection to the landscape area within this area, acceptable to the
Planning Department, and to the landscape area at the northeast corner of Hercules A venue and Rogers Street.
i) Provide handicap parking access to the daycare center (may be via a sidewalk from the adjacent handicap parking
4.
5.
2
space and walk aisle dllY north of the daycare). .
j) Based on the photographs and survey submitted, there is an inconsistency between the two as it relates to the rear
parking area in the southeast portion of the site. The survey notes the majority of this area to be gravel (survey dated
June 4, 1998, and revised on September 18,2003), yet the photographs indicate this area to be paved. Advise/revise
survey.
k) Dimension the width of the driveway on Rogers Street.
1) Install sidewalks along Rogers Street for the street frontages where no sidewalk exists today. Remove all excess
pavement from the right-of-way.
m) There is no improvement proposed to the parking area in the southeast portion of the site. It is recommended to
revise this parking area to provide landscape areas in accordance with Code provisions (or ask for reductions where
necessary), including improvements to traffic flow, number of parking spaces, landscape buffers, interior
landscaping, loading space and dumpster(s) enclosure(s).
n) Based on the photographs submitted, remove the existing chain link fencing within the front setback along Rogers
Street for the parking area in the southeast portion of the site. With landscape buffer improvement along the east
property line, it may also be possible to remove the existing chain link fence along the east property line.
0) It is unclear the reason for the diagonally striped areas within the parking area in the southeast portion of the site.
Advise/revise.
p) For 90 provided parking spaces, four handicap parking spaces are required to be provided. Proper handicap ramp
access is also required to be installed.
q) Section 3-1202.E.l requires interior landscape islands to be installed so that in most cases there are no more than 10
spaces in a row (although there is flexibility with staff to allow up to 15 spaces in a row). There are 27 parking
spaces in the row adjacent to the north side of the shopping center building. Break up the parking with a landscape
island (minimum eight feet wide inside curbing). (DRC note: See Comment 3c under Traffic Engineering. An
alternative also is to provide two landscape islands to break up this row of parking adjacent to the building.)
r) Provide sign package. Show the location of existing/proposed freestanding signage, including the existing/proposed
setback from the property line( s), and provide the height, area and color of existing/proposed signage. Include any
proposed attached signage. The Comprehensive Sign Program may be utilized to retain/modify existing signage.
s) Section 6-104.A for nonconforming signs states that "In the event a building permit is required for the
redevelopment of a principal use/structure, or a principal use/structure is vacant for a period of 180 days, signs on
the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance by obtaining a level one approval in
accordance with the provisions of Article 4, Division 3." A building permit will be required for interior remodeling
to combine the two tenant spaces for R & W Pawn and Ace America Cash Express. Additionally, a building permit
will be required for the proposed site improvements. In relation to the above comment "g" regarding signage, what
changes are proposed to existing freestanding and attached signage? At a minimum, the addresses on the
freestanding signs should be reoriented to read horizontally rather than vertically; those panels on freestanding signs
that are not a white background with red lettering should be changed; and those attached tenant signs that are not on
a white background with individual lettering should be changed.
t) Show the visibility triangles at all driveways, including those for the daycare on Hercules Avenue and the driveway
on Rogers Street, and at the intersections of Gulf to Bay Boulevard/Hercules A venue and Hercules A venue/Rogers
Street. Revise the visibility triangles on the landscape plan to Code size of 20' x 20' and to Code locations.
u) Address/show the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. Coordinate with landscaping. Outdoor lighting is
required to meet the requirements of Sections 3-1301 - 1302.
v) Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required screening. If located on the
roof, note such.
w) Provide traffic flow arrows and signage (including "do not enter" signage) to indicate one-way traffic flow for the
daycare.
x) Show the number, length and width of the daycare van parking space(s), as well as any other parallel parking within
this area of the site. These spaces should be included in the parking count.
y) Owner will need to complete and record a Unity of Title document prior to issuance of any building permits.
z) Revise site data table on Sheet 1 for "side (south)" to "front (south)" and to indicate a 25-foot setback is required.
aa) Indicate on the site plan (or other appropriate plan) all required parking lot interior landscaping crosshatched or
shaded, including the area of each interior area being calculated.
bb) Revise the landscape plan to indicate the amount of interior landscape area is being provided (revise "open space
provided" to "interior landscape area provided", se Comment #aa above). A minimum of 10 percent of the paved
vehicular use area is required.
cc) Coordinate the landscape plan and the site plan as to pavement versus landscape area where the five-sabal palms are
proposed at the rear parking area near the "parking/service area."
dd) Indicate the existing/proposed use of the second floor of the "daycare" building.
ee) When resubmitting the application package for the Community Development Board (CDB), please include a reduced
landscape plan to scale (8 Yz X 11), in color, for CDB presentation purposes.
ff) Provide wheel stops and concrete curbing adjacent to landscape areas in the parking area in the southeast portion of
the site.
3
'.
gg) Typical planting detail! trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants .ding instructions, soil mixes,
backfilling, mulching and protective measures.
hh) Submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program application, addressing all criteria, based on the requests outlined at
the beginning of this letter (or as modified with revised plans).
ii) Is there any outdoor seating for Captain's Pizza?
jj) Code requires foundation landscaping of a minimum width of five feet. Any ability to provide? May need to include
in the request and include as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program application. (DRC note: If the jive-foot
wide area adjacent to the building cannot be provided, the request will need to include "a reduction in the width of
the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from jive feet to zero feet.)
kk) Revise Sheet L-l to indicate Rogers Street on the south (not Turner Street).
11) Indicate through a narrative the proposed building improvements.
mm) Landscaping should be added outside the existing chain link fence along Rogers Street adjacent to the
daycare playground.
nn) Compact parking is not provided by Code. Revise to Code parking space dimensions (9' x 19'). (DRC note: See
Comment 3c under Traffic Engineering.)
00) Added at the DRC meeting: If there is no formal cross access easement with the property owner to the east for the
access between the two properties close to Gulf to Bay Boulevard, it is recommended to record a cross access
easement. Cross access between properties is a very important traffic circulation element that improves the level of
service for adjacent major roadways.
6. Solid Waste:
a) How is solid Waste handled? All Dumpsters must be enclosed. (DRC note: A double enclosure as indicated on the
revised site plan shown at the DRC meeting located either at the eastern end of the easternmost parking row or the
parking row leading up to the rear of the laundry is acceptable.)
7. Land Resources:
a) Show the Brazilian Pepper to be removed. Show on plans prior to building permit.
b) Show the Red Maple tree to be removed, this tree is declining and will not improve. Show on plans prior to building
permit.
8. Fire:
a) No comments.
9. Environmental:
a) No comments.
10. Community Response:
a) Occupational License application for this use was reviewed by Zoning, which requires CDB approval prior to
issuance. Letter stating such was sent to the business 12/14/00. The Occupational License application has been in the
CRT / OCL hold folder since 12/14/00.
b) Bob Hall spoke with Leah Letice from Johnson Blakely (461-1818) on 11/13/03. He informed her that this
information (filing of this FLD application) is satisfactory for our not issuing citations at this time. As long as the
client does not withdraw the case or fail to bring the property into compliance, then we will allow the processes to
occur. However, once the processes stop toward compliance, we would need to initiate enforcement again.
11. Landscapine:
a) Having reviewed the proposed plan with traffic engineering, we have several suggestions that will improve traffic
flow and the landscape for the site, while maintaining all the parking, and in fact adding 5 spaces total per Code for a
total of92 full size spaces. See traffic (Ben Elbo) for plan.
b) Irrigation must meet the City Code per Section 3-1203.C., adjust plans to show 100% coverage, rain sensor,
automatic timer, etc.
c) Per Section 3-1202.E.l Code requires a minimum of 10% interior green space of gross vehicular use area. Interior
islands shall be designed so that in most cases no more than 10 parking spaces are provided in a row. Interior islands
shall be a minimum of 150 sq. ft., and be 8' of green space from back of curb to back of curb.
d) Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of
curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular
use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade.
e) Per Section 3-1202.B.1. Code requires trees to be 10' in height and 2 1/2" cal. at planting, ornamental trees can be 8'
in height and 2" cal., and palms must be 10' clear and straight trunk at planting. Make changes in Legend and submit
revised page for review.
f) Please call Sherrie Nicodemus @ 727-562-4582 to schedule to meet with planner, traffic, and I to review the
suggested parking and landscape plan.
NOTES:
In order to be placed on the January 20,2004, CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans and application material
addressing all above departments' comments by Thursday, December 11,2003, no later than noon. Packets shall be collated, folded
and stapled as appropriate. Submissions not appropriately organized shall be deemed to be insufficient and returned to the applicant.
(DRC note: The applicant indicated at the DRC meeting that resubmission of plans would not be able by December 11,2003, and
4
~ ,~ . .
suggested rather resubmitting by January 5, 2004, for the February 17, 2004, CDB meeting. This timeframe was acceptable.)
5
.~
1:00 p.m.
.
.
FINAL 12/4/03 DRC COMMENTS FOR FLD2003-10055. 2005 GULF TO BAY BLVD.
Case: FLD2003-10055 - 2005 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
Owner/Applicant: Roma Square, Inc.
Representative: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. (13630 58th Street North, Suite 110,
Clearwater, FL 33760; phone: 727-524-1818; fax: 727-524-6090; email:
pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com).
Location: 1.98 acres located on the south side of Gulf to Bay Boulevard at the intersection with Hercules
A venue.
Atlas Page: 298B.
Zoning: C, Commercial District.
Request: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in the Commercial District with a
reduction of the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 7.8 feet (to existing
pavement), a reduction of the front (west) setback along Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet (to
existing pavement), reductions of the front (south setback along Rogers Street from 25 feet to one foot (to
existing building) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback
from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a
deviation to locate contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel, a deviation to locate within a building which
does not meet all of the current land development regulations and building regulations and a reduction of
required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (114 spaces) to 3.97 spaces per 1,000 square feet
(90 spaces), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.L and
(2) to permit a reduction of the landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 feet to 7.8
feet (to existing pavement), a reduction of the landscape buffer along Hercules Avenue (west) from 10 feet
to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction of the landscape buffer along Rogers Street (south) from 10
feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction of
the landscape buffer along the east property line from five feet to one foot (to existing building) and from
five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions
of Section 3-1202.G.
Proposed Use: Problematic use (check cashing).
Neighborhood Association: Skycrest Association (Elizabeth France, 1629 Cleveland Street, Clearwater,
FL 33756; phone: 727-442-5856; email: eaf5054(@earthlink.net).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson, Rick Albee, Tom Glenn, Arden
Dittmer, and Wayne Wells.
Applicant/Representative: Robert Pergolizzi, Karen Taylor, Ed Arrnstrongand Sam Colucci
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No comment since no change to building coverage.
2. Stormwater:
a) No comments.
3. Traffic Enl!ineerinl!:
a) Remove first two driveways immediately east of the SR60 and Hercules Avenue intersection to
improve Level of Service along Gulf To Bay Blvd. and provide more connection spacing between
a driveway and traffic signal (min. 125'.) See Section 3-102 D. Community Development Code.
(DRC note: Applicant to investigate closing either the easternmost or the middle driveway, in
addition to westernmost driveway, including a review of the median opening.)
b) Provide more parking utilizing the added space gained from the removal of the two driveways.
c) Three consecutive driveways along Hercules A venue results in safety concerns for the many
conflict points. This portion of the parking area needs to be redesigned to minimize conflict points.
This could provide more parking spaces that comply with the parking stall standards. (DRC note:
Final 12/4/03 DRC Comments -FLD2003-10055 - Page 1 of5
"-~
",
.
.
The site plan submitted shows compact parking adjacent to Gulf to Bay Boulevard due to the
sidewalk adjacent to the building "bumping" out two feet about midpoint of the building. See
Comment 3g below. Two options were outlined at the DRC meeting: 1) In order to provide as
much landscaping as possible along Gulf to Bay Boulevard, retain the compact parking; or 2) As
recommended by Arden Dittmer, remove the parking spaces at the two-foot sidewalk "bump out, "
making this area a landscape area (with a potential sidewalk cafe in a portion of this area) and
making the compact parking regular length spaces of 19 feet. Another option is: 3) remove two
feet of the sidewalk adjacent to the building to allow the compact spaces to become regular spaces
19 feet in length adjacent to Gulf to Bay Boulevard. After discussing this with Frank "Chip"
Gerlock, it is preferred to look at options 2 or 3, especially option 2.)
d) All Handicapped stalls must comply with the current City standards i.e. there must not be any
obstacles in the 5'xI9' handicapped aisle such as ramps. Handicapped aisle must be flush with
sidewalk and ramp must start at the wings of the sidewalk as shown on the City details.
e) All removed driveways must match existing curbs and sidewalks.
f) A minimum of four handicap parking spaces must be provided for the current number of parking
spaces.
g) Compact parking not acceptable for required parking calculations. (DRC note: See comment 3c.)
h) Show 20' x20' sight visibility triangles for driveway on Rogers Street.
i) Show loading zone exclusive of parking spaces and drive aisles.
j) All of the above must be submitted prior to CDB.
k) Prior to building permit, submit a FDOT permit for construction along State right of way and
adhere to their conditions.
4. General Enl!ineerinl!:
a) No comments.
5. Planninl!:
a) Revise the application to include all of the requests listed above, including these requests in the
responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria.
b) It is strongly suggested to include a narrative as part of the application that explains the primary
reason for the request (problematic use), how Ace America's Cash Express (Ace) will expand its
present square footage to include the existing R & W Pawn Shop tenant space (thereby eliminating
an existing problematic use) and the time frame as to when R & W Pawn Shop will close and Ace
will take over that tenant space (submitting for and obtaining a building permit for combining the
two tenant spaces and completion of the renovation and obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy).
Since Ace has illegally occupied this present location since November 2000 and there has been
longstanding Code enforcement action, it is further suggested that these time frames be very short.
(DRC note: Applicant to provide a timeframe as part of a narrative for removal of the pawn shop
andfor submitting for building permits, taking into account buying out the lease of the pawn shop
and length of time to obtain FDOT approval to remove the driveways on Gulf to Bay Boulevard.)
c) Revise the application to include all Parcel Numbers for the property:
13/29/15/57690/000/0010 13/29/15/57690/000/0030 13/29/15/57690/000/0060
13/29/15/57690/000/0080 13/29/15/57690/000/0090 13/29/15/57690/000/0110
d) To improve the level of service of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, improve vehicular safety and increase
provided parking, remove two of the existing driveways on Gulf to Bay Boulevard (suggested to
retain the easternmost driveway). (DRC note: See comment 3a under Traffic Engineering.)
e) Provide the width of all proposed landscape islands. Section 3-1202.E.l provides that interior
landscape islands must be a minimum of 150 square feet in area and eight feet wide inside
curbing.
f) To improve parking lot design and make the landscape plan more cohesive, it is recommended to
eliminate the existing raised planter adjacent to Gulf to Bay Boulevard (close to Hercules
Avenue).
g) The existing main shopping center driveway on Hercules A venue is not dimensioned, but scales at
approximately 39 feet wide. Recommend reducing this driveway down closer to or at 24 feet wide
to gain parking and/or interior landscaping, while not compromising traffic flow.
h) Either pave the existing unpaved employee parking for the daycare to City Code or remove
parking from the area shown adjacent to Hercules Avenue. Provide protection to the landscape
Final 12/4/03 DRC Comments - FLD2003-10055 - Page 2 of 5
-,
.
.
area within this area, acceptable to the Planning Department, and to the landscape area at the
northeast comer of Hercules A venue and Rogers Street.
i) Provide handicap parking access to the daycare center (may be via a sidewalk from the adjacent
handicap parking space and walk aisle directly north of the daycare).
j) Based on the photographs and survey submitted, there is an inconsistency between the two as it
relates to the rear parking area in the southeast portion of the site. The survey notes the majority
of this area to be gravel (survey dated June 4, 1998, and revised on September 18,2003), yet the
photographs indicate this area to be paved. Advise/revise survey.
k) Dimension the width of the driveway on Rogers Street.
1) Install sidewalks along Rogers Street for the street frontages where no sidewalk exists today.
Remove all excess pavement from the right-of-way.
m) There is no improvement proposed to the parking area in the southeast portion of the site. It is
recommended to revise this parking area to provide landscape areas in accordance with Code
provisions (or ask for reductions where necessary), including improvements to traffic flow,
number of parking spaces, landscape buffers, interior landscaping, loading space and dumpster( s)
enclosure( s ).
n) Based on the photographs submitted, remove the existing chain link fencing within the front
setback along Rogers Street for the parking area in the southeast portion of the site. With
landscape buffer improvement along the east property line, it may also be possible to remove the
existing chain link fence along the east property line.
0) It is unclear the reason for the diagonally striped areas within the parking area in the southeast
portion of the site. Advise/revise.
p) For 90 provided parking spaces, four handicap parking spaces are required to be provided. Proper
handicap ramp access is also required to be installed.
q) Section 3-1202.E.l requires interior landscape islands to be installed so that in most cases there
are no more than 10 spaces in a row (although there is flexibility with staff to allow up to 15
spaces in a row). There are 27 parking spaces in the row adjacent to the north side of the shopping
center building. Break up the parking with a landscape island (minimum eight feet wide inside
curbing). (DRC note: See Comment 3c under Traffic Engineering. An alternative also is to
provide two landscape islands to break up this row of parking adjacent to the building.)
r) Provide sign package. Show the location of existing/proposed freestanding signage, including the
existing/proposed setback from the property line(s), and provide the height, area and color of
existing/proposed signage. Include any proposed attached signage. The Comprehensive Sign
Program may be utilized to retain/modify existing signage.
s) Section 6-104.A for nonconforming signs states that "In the event a building permit is required for
the redevelopment of a principal use/structure, or a principal use/structure is vacant for a period of
180 days, signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance by
obtaining a level one approval in accordance with the provisions of Article 4, Division 3." A
building permit will be required for interior remodeling to combine the two tenant spaces for R &
W Pawn and Ace America Cash Express. Additionally, a building permit will be required for the
proposed site improvements. In relation to the above comment "g" regarding signage, what
changes are proposed to existing freestanding and attached signage? At a minimum, the addresses
on the freestanding signs should be reoriented to read horizontally rather than vertically; those
panels on freestanding signs that are not a white background with red lettering should be changed;
and those attached tenant signs that are not on a white background with individual lettering should
be changed.
t) Show the visibility triangles at all driveways, including those for the daycare on Hercules A venue
and the driveway on Rogers Street, and at the intersections of Gulf to Bay Boulevard/Hercules
Avenue and Hercules A venue/Rogers Street. Revise the visibility triangles on the landscape plan
to Code size of20' x 20' and to Code locations.
u) Address/show the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. Coordinate with landscaping. Outdoor
lighting is required to meet the requirements of Sections 3-1301 - 1302.
v) Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required screening.
Iflocated on the roof, note such.
w) Provide traffic flow arrows and signage (including "do not enter" signage) to indicate one-way
traffic flow for the daycare.
Final 12/4/03 DRC Comments - FLD2003-10055 - Page 3 of5
.
-'
.
.
x) Show the number, length and width of the daycare van parking space(s), as well as any other
parallel parking within this area of the site. These spaces should be included in the parking count.
y) Owner will need to complete and record a Unity of Title document prior to issuance of any
building permits.
z) Revise site data table on Sheet 1 for "side (south)" to "front (south)" and to indicate a 25-foot
setback is required.
aa) Indicate on the site plan (or other appropriate plan) all required parking lot interior landscaping
crosshatched or shaded, including the area of each interior area being calculated.
bb) Revise the landscape plan to indicate the amount of interior landscape area is being provided
(revise "open space provided" to "interior landscape area provided", se Comment #aa above). A
minimum of 10 percent of the paved vehicular use area is required.
cc) Coordinate the landscape plan and the site plan as to pavement versus landscape area where the
five-sabal palms are proposed at the rear parking area near the "parking/service area."
dd) Indicate the existing/proposed use of the second floor of the "daycare" building.
ee) When resubmitting the application package for the Community Development Board (CDB),
please include a reduced landscape plan to scale (8 'li X 11), in color, for CDB presentation
purposes.
ff) Provide wheel stops and concrete curbing adjacent to landscape areas in the parking area in the
southeast portion of the site.
gg) Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions,
soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures.
hh) Submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program application, addressing all criteria, based on the
requests outlined at the beginning of this letter (or as modified with revised plans).
ii) Is there any outdoor seating for Captain's Pizza?
jj) Code requires foundation landscaping of a minimum width of five feet. Any ability to provide?
May need to include in the request and include as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program
application. (DRC note: If the jive-foot wide area adjacent to the building cannot be provided, the
request will need to include "a reduction in the width of the required foundation landscaping
adjacent to the building from jive feet to zero feet.)
kk) Revise Sheet L-l to indicate Rogers Street on the south (not Turner Street).
11) Indicate through a narrative the proposed building improvements.
mm) Landscaping should be added outside the existing chain link fence along Rogers Street
adjacent to the daycare playground.
nn) Compact parking is not provided by Code. Revise to Code parking space dimensions (9' x 19').
(DRC note: See Comment 3c under Traffic Engineering.)
00) Added at the DRC meeting: If there is no formal cross access easement with the property owner to
the east for the access between the two properties close to Gulf to Bay Boulevard, it is
recommended to record a cross access easement. Cross access between properties is a very
important traffic circulation element that improves the level of service for adjacent major
roadways.
6. Solid Waste:
a) How is solid Waste handled? All Dumpsters must be enclosed. (DRC note: A double enclosure
as indicated on the revised site plan shown at the DRC meeting located either at the eastern end of
the easternmost parking row or the parking row leading up to the rear of the laundry is
acceptable.)
7. Land Resources:
a) Show the Brazilian Pepper to be removed. Show on plans prior to building permit.
b) Show the Red Maple tree to be removed, this tree is declining and will not improve. Show on
plans prior to building permit.
8. Fire:
a) No comments.
9. Environmental:
a) No comments.
10. Community Response:
Final 12/4/03 DRC Comments-FLD2003-10055 - Page 4 of5
"
-'
.
.
a) Occupational License application for this use was reviewed by Zoning, which requires CDB
approval prior to issuance, Letter stating such was sent to the business 12/14/00. The Occupational
License application has been in the CRT / OCL hold folder since 12/14/00.
b) Bob Hall spoke with Leah Letice from Johnson Blakely (461-1818) on 11/13/03. He informed her
that this information (filing of this FLD application) is satisfactory for our not issuing citations at
this time. As long as the client does not withdraw the case or fail to bring the property into
compliance, then we will allow the processes to occur. However, once the processes stop toward
compliance, we would need to initiate enforcement again.
11. Landscapinl!:
a) Having reviewed the proposed plan with traffic engineering, we have several suggestions that will
improve traffic flow and the landscape for the site, while maintaining all the parking, and in fact
adding 5 spaces total per Code for a total of92 full size spaces. See traffic (Ben Elbo) for plan.
b) Irrigation must meet the City Code per Section 3-1203.C., adjust plans to show 100% coverage,
rain sensor, automatic timer, etc.
c) Per Section 3-1202.E.l Code requires a minimum of 10% interior green space of gross vehicular
use area. Interior islands shall be designed so that in most cases no more than 10 parking spaces
are provided in a row. Interior islands shall be a minimum of 150 sq. ft., and be 8' of green space
from back of curb to back of curb.
d) Per Section 3-l204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by
the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any
landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have
a minimum height of six inches above grade.
e) Per Section 3-l202.B.1. Code requires trees to be 10' in height and 2 1/2" cal. at planting,
ornamental trees can be 8' in height and 2" cal., and palms must be 10' clear and straight trunk at
planting. Make changes in Legend and submit revised page for review.
f) Please call Sherrie Nicodemus @ 727-562-4582 to schedule to meet with planner, traffic, and I to
review the suggested parking and landscape plan.
NOTES:
In order to be placed on the January 20, 2004, CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans and
application material addressing all above departments' comments by Thursday, December 11, 2003, no later than
noon. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Submissions not appropriately organized shall be
deemed to be insufficient and returned to the applicant. (DRC note: The applicant indicated at the DRC meeting
that resubmission of plans would not be able by December //,2003, and suggested rather resubmitting by January
5, 2004,for the February /7, 2004, CDB meeting. This timeframe was acceptable.)
\\MS5c\PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending cases \ Up for the next DRC\Gulfto Bay 2005 Ace
America's Cash Express (C)\Gulfto Bay 2005 Final/2.4.03 DRC Comments /2.5. 03. doc
Final 12/4/03 DRC Comments-FLD2003-10055 - Page 5 of5
.
F-704
.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
5. Off-street parking: The operational char-
acter of the .outdoorrecreationl entertain-
ment use and the location of the parcel
proposed for development is such that the
likely use of the property will require
fewer parking spates per land area than
otherwise required or that significant por-
tions. of the land will be used for passive or
other non-parking demand-generating pur-
poses.
6. FrQ~t setback: The reduction in. front set-
back:resultsinan improved site plan or
improved dE!$ign and appearance.
7. Rear $etback:
a. The reduction in rear setback does
. not prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles;
b. The reduction in rear setback re-
sults in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking, or iInproved de-
sign and appearance and landscaped
areas ltte in excess of the minimum
required.
K Overnight accommodations.
1. Lot area. and width: The reduction in lot
arell and width will not result in a build-
ing which is out of scale with existing
buildings. in the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development will not involve direct
access. to a major arterial street;
3. Height:
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan, landscaping ar-
eas in excess of the minimum re-
quired and/or improved design and
appearance;
b. The increased height will not reduce
the vertical component of the view
from any adjacent residential prop-
erty.
4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet. above the finished
grade of the front lot line of the parcel
Supp. No.6
CD2:60
proposed. for development unless such
signage is a part of an approved compre-
hensive sign program;
5. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
b. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance.
6. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
L. Problematic It&eS.
1. Location.
a. The parcel proposed for development
is not contiguous to a parcel of land
which is designated as residential in
the Zoning Atlas;
b. The use is not located within 500
feet of another problematic use;
2. Design.
a. The building in which the use is
located is painted or otherwise fin-
ished in materials and colors which
are muted;
b. There are no security bars on the
outside of doors or windows which
are visible .from a public right-of-
way;
3. Signs. Any signage which has a height of
greater than six feet isa part ofacompre-
hensive sign program;
4. The building in which the use is located is
a building which is conforming to all cur-
rent land development and building reg-
ulations.
5. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
.
.
ZONING DISTRICTS
~ 2-7
6. Rear setback:
a. The reduction in rear setback does
not prevent access to the rear of any
building by ~mergency vehicles.
b. The reduction in rear setback re-
sults in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking, or improved de-
sign and appearance and landscaped
areas are in excess of the minimum
required.
M. Restaurants. .
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with..existing buildings in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development fronts on but will not
involve direct access to a major arterial
street;
3. Height:
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan, landscaping ar-
eas in excess of the minimum re-
quired and/or improved design and
appearance;
b. The increased height will not reduce
the vertical component of the view
from any adjacent residential prop-
erty.
4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the fInished
grade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless such
signage is a part of an approved compre-
hensive sign program;
5. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
b. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
Supp. No.6
CD2:61
design and appearance and land-
scaped areas are in excess of the
minimum required.
6. Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteristics of a pro-
posed building are such that the
likely uses of the property will re-
quire fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required or that
the use of significant portions of the
building will be used for storage or
other non-parking demand-generat-
ing purposes;
b. Fast food restaurants shall not be
eligible for a reduction in the num-
ber of off-street parking spaces.
7. Front setback: The reduction in front set-
back results in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
N. Retail sales and service.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in IL
area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the
immediate vicinity of the parcef proposed
for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development fronts on but will not
involve direct access to a major arterial
street;
3. Height:
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan, landscaping ar-
eas in excess of the minimum re-
quired or improved design and ap-
pearance;
b. The increased height will not reduce
the vertical component of the view
from any adjacent residential prop-
erty.
4. Side and rear setback:
a. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to a
rear of any building by emergen
vehicles;
ltt ~
8 ~
N 0'\
;;:; 0
- ..".
;:::; ";t:
o 8 .~ 5 ~ ~ '0. ~ ~ n) E-< .
~.~~~ ~ ~~o~b~O ~ ~n) ffi n) ~
...... a:l @-O "0 ..... I;: 0.....JQ.,. u-.....o5"O ~ > Z
~~~~ ~ n)~~8~O .....~~~ ~ ~z~~ 5 ~ 8 ~
.s '0 .0 ~ .~ 5 0.. 8 8 :2 ~ g ~ ~ 0 $ ..... 8 :Q ~ ~"O 0 05
~l~;~n) ~~.~j8~ a~l.t ~ e~kCl I !ij ~.....s
~...J~~~I ]~'a~E-<~ ~.5"2~ ~ ~I]~ ~ g u~~
>. ~ n) --: Cl "2 a .S '8 o:S ~ c.:;l -5 ~ o...s ~ .; ~ rJ'.l 'S Q ~ ~ S o..:€i
~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~z ~ 8..9 ~ 8 ~ .~] .~ 1;1! 8 .~ ~.~ [f{jCl ~ .~ .g ~
"08 '-'0 'U"O ~~~ >.rJ'.l"O ~-.... -:J2 0.. '"
n) .- ~ U n) 8 ~.- (l):J2 ...J E= 0. ~!ij ~ -5 :J2 t<l <S ~ ~ t<l "0
8 .9 'S: ~ ..... 05 5 11 6b t<l ~ CZl ,8 ~:J: ~ ~ 1;1 ~ ~ n) cz:: !ij 0. n) o:S ~
.~~e.~5~~~8'~o.O~~8!ij~~~8 o.o~~ E '0 ~8~~
rJ'.l .;; 0.. u 8 'N ~ ~ >."2 ~ ui _..... 0. 8 "0 1;'\ g.. Ii:l ..... U >. n) 0
~ ~ "0 SF go:.= ~ ~ !ij .... 08 ] ~> ~E-< ~ ~ ~ 0.. 0 ;:l8 tl ~8 P.- <: ,;;: ,~ -g;;l .E
:$ <1l !ij Cil ~ 'p ~ [) 8 n) -a 8 0 ~ ~ D '6 <:s Po. ~ ~ rJ'.l. ~
~ ~ ,.!:s > ~ ~ .> n) ~ ~ ~ ~ ;:J .:a ~ ~ ~ n) ~ !ij g ~ CZl .~ U ~ '2 .t::
~E~l~'So~o5i's:e~c.:;l~!~i.s~ ~~~b .E ~ ~i;
o ~ co >..f' ~ ~ .~.B a3 ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 15,~ <S ~ ~ ~ f5 .~ ~ ~ 8 ~ OJ
~~~i~~~g~=~rJ'.lZ~~~~~~~~'OU:J2~CZ::bO~ ~.s~
~<:~.>~~~H~~~i~~,~~'~~~lo~~k~~?~.~~i~~ ~
~~~~~~i88.~!I~~l,~1~~~~.~.Bi~~~!]Z8~~~~~
~ ~ c.:;l 5 Cl > 0 ~ 0":': ~ ~ ~ ~ :I: 'E ~ ,<;:: ~ .... ~ ,S "2 8 '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '0.... ,0 E
~:J:~~8~~~~k~~CZl~~~~;~~~~~88~~~]~ i~~8
"Oo~- n) rJ'.ln)'-~O~ j!ij~"O "0 0 -t o~~ ~=o
~. !ij ~ .D M :C-05 '0' ,S 05 8. ~ E-< Cl S' rJ'.l ~ I;: 'r;; ~ 'r;; C' 5. eo au? cz:: O'S. ::Q' 8 8 z
~
io
's;
.'"
"
-<
~
oS
V
"I "I
0 0
~c.:;l 0
NCZl
~;l ~~
-- --
(:) - 0
-
V ...J
~l/'l C ~
> ::;E
. ... l/'l .J
~8 CD
~J: ~ <"'l
c8 CD ~
0 0
..... M
> 9 ~ n)
..... ~
...... LL ~
C.J ~ .J Po.
-< ::) z
:ii C) 0
Qj 0
~ ~ In
~ 0
U = 0 ~ ~
U N
0 0
z z
".
0
0
N
--
M
-
--
-
~~I
-0
u
....
"I
o
o
N
--
-
".
o
o
N
--
-
N
--
o
~
OJ
';;
n)
P:::
~
=
'I::
n)
OJ
.S
gp
~
=-=u
~
OJ
';;
OJ
g ~
.. ~
Q., =
'C ~
u u
~ S
~ o:S
....
E-<
o
00
o
o
:3
~
"I
o
o
N
--
-
N
--
o
'S
-0
n)
..=
u
o:S
t::
o:S
rJ'.l
t::
n)
~ =
() o:S
0-
og;
<n
-q-
N
<
:3
~
'o::t ~ !!! . . ~
0
0 ~ i-
N 0 'S:
-- -
V) .'"
"
- ~ ...:
-- ~
- ..
u
CIJ
'" z
s::
0 ~ ;
..,
:.a ~
s::
0 0
u 8 u
~ ~ 0 0
z CIJ s:: Z
<'. <', ~ <'. <', <'I (' , <'. ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..". 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CIJ N ~ N CI.l 0 <I N ~ N CI.l N CI.l N ~ 0 < N :::.a 0 <I
> -- -- ~ N -- -- > -- ~ -- N ~I -- N
N ~ - -- N ~ - - N ~ 0 ......1 --
..". ~ -- >.a 0
...... N N -- N N ...... N N r- ~ --
-- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -
N 0 - N 0 0 N - 0 -
- - - -
Of) ~ <I ~ ~ < :::.a ~I
= If) c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ......1
>
.... If) ..J
..... 8
rI.I m
.... ~ ~
~ ~
E~ m ~
'+-<
0 0
N
~9 .... (l)
LL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ?f
CJ ~ ..J Q..
< .. :;) ~ z ~ z ~ ~ z
C) 0 0 0
cu =It 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
rI.I ~ It)
~ 0
u = 0 (l) (l) ~ (l) ~ ~ (l) (l) (l) (l)
U N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
z z ::c: z ::c: ::c: z z z z
<' . ~ <'I ~ <', ~
0 0 0 0 ..". 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N 0 N
-- N -- N N -- N
N -- N -- 0 --
~ ~ -- >.a
- N r- ~ --
-- - -- N -- -- -
- - N - - 0 -
-
<',
0
0
N
--
r-
-
--
-
<'. <'. <'I <', <'. <', <', <', <'I <'I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
- - - - - - - - - -
N N N N N N N N N N
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- -
'" ~
'" -
~ ~ (l)
u ';>
,9 (1j ~
(l) ~ ~
- "0 - (l)
~ (l) - u (1j ';>
]- =' (l) "3 ......
u 0 ~ u (l) (l)
~~I u ~ u ~
0 "0 >. "0 ~ S (l) ~ ~
~ (l) U ....
U (l) - (1j ';> 0 (l) (l)
';;j i:: (1j .... '" - ';>
'+-< (l) (l) t-- ~ (l) (1j
.... 0 ~ =' .... bl) ~ ~ ~
(l) .... CI.l U ~ <C -
~ (l) q (l) 0. .~ "0 'I:: '" (1j "0
t (l) (1j u (l) bl) ~ (l)
(1j (l) 0 ,~
(l) .... ~ .... (l) (l) .3 (1j -
0 ~ 0 t-- O~ > ~ ~ CI.l ~
0 ..". 00 0 >.a V) 0 0 0 0
-0 ~ ..". - ~ - - >.a V) - N
u N N 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0
t- < < < < < < 0 0 0 0
0 B B 0 0 0 0 B B 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
":t :::E ,~ ] , :r . . ~
0
0 ~ i-
N 0\
--- '? .g~.. A 'S:
<n 'J:::
"
- ~ 6 If: j'; ..:
--- 1i
- ~) 1 ..
u
~ ../'
~r~
B
~ -1
::l ,#
0"'1
~~ t
]).
-0
] ~-'
<I) l.
't'l II .
~ r~ vi <Ii
(") .g s:: rJ) rJ)
-0 0 0 6 1
ii 1 '~
~ :.a '~
.~ D :.a :.a
- 6 6 6
~~l ~ u U u 8 ~
~ ~ ~ 0
0 CI) CI) rJ) s:: Z
PI J; PI PI PI PI (") PI (") PI PI
o . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
p::: ~J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N CI) N CI) N ~ N ~ 0 ~ N ~ 0 ~I N ~ N ~
~ --- ~ --- ~ --- -- N -- N --- --
;::!;E-< - - - N ~ -- ~ (") ~ -- 0 - ~
0 N N - N ~ N "<t - -
---
-- -- --- --- -- - -- - -- --
- ' 0 0 - N - N - - -
- -
~ ~ CI) ~ ~I ~ ~
~ If) c ~ ~ ~ ~ ::r: ~
= >
.... If) .J
..... 8
r.I) Ie
.... ~ ~
~ ~ 0
~ ~ Ie . (")
......
..... 0 p 0
.... ~ (")
> 9 I- @ ~ <I)
.... ~
..... u.. 0 ~ ~ ~ ~
C.J ~ .J ~
-< ~ ...:l 5 z z z
:it C) 0 0 0 0
QJ ::r: 0 0 0 0
r.I) ~ Lt)
~ 0
u ~ 0 ~ ~ <I) ~ <I) <I) <I) ~ ~ <I)
U N s:: s:: s:: s:: s::
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
z z z z z z z z z Z
PI (") PI PI PI PI
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N t:! t:!
--- N -- ---
- -- - 00 0 -
- ~ N - - -
-- N -- -- --- --
- - 0 - - -
(")
0
0
N
--
~
-
-
PI <', PI PI P, PI PI <'I <'I P'
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N
-- --- --- --- -- --- -- --- -- --
- - - - - - - - - -
N N N N N N N N N N
--- -- --- --- -- --- --- -- --- ---
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-
~ ~
~ -0 ~ <I) <I)
~ <I) 'S: 'S:
<I) ;;- <I)
<I) 'S: ~ <I)
::.:: 'S: 'S: 'Q) p:::
'-' <I) <I) u ~ ~ t;J ....
~~I = ~ ~ eo eo <I) B
,S .S ~ .... <I) eo i:i
.i u B s:: 'S: rJ)
... ~ rJ) t) t) <I) .9 <I) s:: ~ 0:1
Cl. 0:1 .<;::: <I) <I) 'S: p::: 'g. :::E
1: ~ rJ) :::E :::E ~ 'i<i
~ c(l :> .~ gf u .g I-<
rJ) 0
Q ~ :g a:l ~ ~ P.. 'S -0 .e
"0 <I) 0 c:: ~
0:1 ... p.. 0 j 0:1
.....
~ CI) CI) u 0 u <( N ::r:
0 0 0 0 0 \0 0 N "<t N 0
-", E (") "<t "<t <n ~ - - - - "<t 0\
'-' 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
..... .e; 0 0 <( <( <( 0 <( 0 0 0 0
tl 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 9
< ...:l ...:l ...:l ...:l ...:l ...:l ...:l
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
,of
"II'-'I~IIt:~
.i!:.t.llt "~"#"'.'
~~~. ...-
'1ft' .' ", -
" - l" ....
.~_.;.I"..~J .1'\ "-'.
..-:'... .............,............ ..g:.......
':r-:.~ . .~
~...... ~
~~~. .........'.~.'..~\
~....'}.. TEQ""..
I:IIH
.
.
Conditions Associated With
FLD2003-10055
2005 GULF TO BAY BLVD
Landscape Curbing Condition
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
01/08/2004
1/8/2004 - (A_D)
The southern half of the property does not show any curbing, adjust plans to meet this condition.
11/6/2003 - (A_D)
Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by
the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any
landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall
have a minimum height of six inches above grade.
Landscape 10% Interior Condi1
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
01/08/2004
1/8/2004 - (A_D)
The plans have an island located along Gulf to Bay (approx. 120' from Hercules) that is less than
8' between curbs, by widening approx. 4' and reducing the nw corner island with the sign by the 4'
you will open the drive to 24' as required and meet this code requirement.
11/6/2003 - (A_D)
Per Section 3-1202.E.1 Code requires a minimum of 10% interior green space of gross vehicular
use area or 12% of gross vehicular use area if parking spaces area greater than 110% of the
required parking. Interior islands shall be designed so that in most cases no more than 10
parking spaces are provided in a row. Interior islands shall be a minimum of 150 sq. ft., and be 8'
of green space from back of curb to back of curb.
Landscape
01/08/2004
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
Plan submitted is much better, however there are still a few minor adjustments from what was
discussed at the last meeting. Since you aren't showing the landscape bed in front of the units in
the north parking lot to somewhat meet the building facade landscape requirement of the code,
plans need to be modified to remove the three (3) spaces within the 15' setback from Rogers St.
and locate the trees accordingly in the planters.
11/6/2003 - (A_D)
Having reviewed the proposed plan with traffic engineering, we have several suggestions that will
improve traffic flow and the landscape for the site, while maintaining all the parking, and in fact
adding 5 spaces total per Code for a total of 92 full size spaces. See traffic (Ben Elbo) for plan.
Legal Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW - For CRT
Occupational License application for this use was reviewed by Zoning, which requires COB
approval prior to issuance. Letter stating such was sent to the business 12/14/00. The
Occupational License application has been in the CRT / OCL hold folder since 12/14/00.
12/04/2003 12/4/03- WW - For CRT
Bob Hall spoke with Leah Letice from Johnson Blakely (461-1818) on 11/13/03. He informed her
that this information (filing of this FLD application) is satisfactory for our not issuing citations at this
time. As long as the client does not withdraw the case or fail to bring the property into compliance,
then we will allow the processes to occur. However, once the processes stop toward compliance,
we would need to initiate enforcement again.
Traffic Eng Condition Scott Rice 562-4781
01/07/2004 Landscaping at northeast corner of parking lot must be redesigned to provide 24-foot drive aisle.
Print Date: 01/15/2004
1 of 5
Not Met *
Not Metlf
Not Met *
Not Met ~
Not Met ~
Not Met-*
CaseConditons
~
.
.
FLD2003-10055
2005 GULF TO BAY BLVD
Traffic Eng Condition Scott Rice 562-4781
01/07/2004 Applicant must submit narrative justifying driveway configuration along Hercules Avenue. This is Not Met ~
an existing arrangement that seperates commercial traffic from daycare traffic and provides for
safe delivery of children to the daycare.
01/07/2004 Applicant to submit narrative justifying limited backout space for parking stalls south of one story Not Met ~
commercial building. Landscaping was added in this area to provide a safety buffer between these
parking spaces and the daycare playground.
Zoning Condition
Wayne Wells
562-4504
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW
Revise the application to include all of the requests listed above, including these requests in the
responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria.
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW
It is strongly suggested to include a narrative as part of the application that explains the primary
reason for the request (problematic use), how Ace America's Cash Express (Ace) will expand its
present square footage to include the existing R & W Pawn Shop tenant space (thereby
eliminating an existing problematic use) and the time frame as to when R & W Pawn Shop will
close and Ace will take over that tenant space (submitting for and obtaining a building permit for
combining the two tenant spaces and completion of the renovation and obtaining a Certificate of
Occupancy). Since Ace has illegally occupied this present location since November 2000 and
there has been longstanding Code enforcement action, it is further suggested that these time
frames be very short. (DRC note: Applicant to provide a timeframe as part of a narrative for
removal of the pawn shop and for submitting for building permits, taking into account buying out
the lease of the pawn shop and length of time to obtain FOOT approval to remove the driveways
on Gulf to Bay Boulevard.)
12/04/2003 J 12/4/03 - WW l) ~
Revise the application to include all Parcel Numbers for the property:
13/29/15/57690/000/0010 13/29/15/57690/000/0030 13/29/15/57690/000/0060
13/29/15/57690/000/0080 13/29/15/57690/000/0090 13/29/15/57690/000/0110
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW 1> ~
To improve the level of service of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, improve vehicular safety and increase
provided parking, remove two of the existing driveways on Gulf to Bay Boulevard (suggested to
retain the easternmost driveway). (DRC note: See comment 3a under Traffic Engineering.)
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW \) ~
Provide the width of all proposed landscape islands. Section 3-1202.E.1 provides that interior
landscape islands must be a minimum of 150 square feet in area and eight feet wide inside
curbing.
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW \) I,N--IL
To improve parking lot design and make the landscape plan more cohesive, it is recommended to
eliminate the existing raised planter adjacent to Gulf to Bay Boulevard (close to Hercules Avenue).
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW \) cJ"v-.L-
The existing main shopping center driveway on Hercules Avenue is not dimensioned, but scales
at approximately 39 feet wide. Recommend reducing this driveway down closer to or at 24 feet
wide to gain parking and/or interior landscaping, while not compromising traffic flow.
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW \) G'\r'l-
Either pave the existing unpaved employee parking for the daycare to City Code or remove
parking from the area shown adjacent to Hercules Avenue. Provide protection to the landscape
area within this area, acceptable to the Planning Department, and to the landscape area at the
northeast corner of Hercules Avenue and Rogers Street.
Print Date: 01/15/2004
2 of 5
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
CaseConditons
...
Zoning Condition
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/4/03 - WW V Q"\rJL..
Provide handicap parking access to the daycare center (may be via a sidewalk from the adjacent
handicap parking space and walk aisle directly north of the daycare).
12/4/03 - WW \) ~
Based on the photographs and survey submitted, there is an inconsistency between the two as it
relates to the rear parking area in the southeast portion of the site. The survey notes the majority
of this area to be gravel (survey dated June 4, 1998, and revised on September 18, 2003), yet the
photographs indicate this area to be paved. Advise/revise survey.
12/4/03 - WW \) ~
Dimension the width of the driveway on Rogers Street.
12/4/03 - WW '9 W"c-lL
Install sidewalks along Rogers Street for the street frontages where no sidewalk exists today.
Remove all excess pavement from the right-of-way.
12/4/03-WW V~
There is no improvement proposed to the parking area in the southeast portion of the site. It is
recommended to revise this parking area to provide landscape areas in accordance with Code
provisions (or ask for reductions where necessary), including improvements to traffic flow, number
of parking spaces, landscape buffers, interior landscaping, loading space and dumpster(s)
enclosure(s).
12/4/03 - ww ?ov-i\....,
Based on the photographs submitted, remove the existing chain link fencing within the front
setback along Rogers Street for the parking area in the southeast portion of the site. With
landscape buffer improvement along the east property line, it may also be possible to remove the
existing chain link fence along the east property line.
12/4/03-WW V~
It is unclear the reason for the diagonally striped areas within the parking area in the southeast
portion of the site. Advise/revise.
12/4/03 - WW 'S \\C- r~ w" t'!.~ - ~ "-.. ~ ~ ('"Cl ",kd \ ere j ,~t Met
For 90 provided parking spaces, four han~cap parking spaces ~re req'uired to be provided.
Proper handicap ramp access is also required to be installed.
12/4/03-WW D~
Section 3-1202.E.1 requires interior landscape islands to be installed so that in most cases there
are no more than 10 spaces in a row (although there is flexibility with staff to allow up to 15
spaces in a row). There are 27 parking spaces in the row adjacent to the north side of the
shopping center building. Break up the parking with a landscape island (minimum eight feet wide
inside curbing). (DRC note: See Comment 3c under Traffic Engineering. An alternative also is to
provide two landscape islands to break up this row of parking adjacent to the building.)
12/4/03 - WW N '\)1-- \) ~ Not Met ~
Provide sign package. Show the location of existing/proposed freestanding signage, including the
existing/proposed setback from the property line(s), and provide the height, area and color of
existing/proposed signage. Include any proposed attached signage. The Comprehensive Sign
Program may be utilized to retain/modify existing signage.
.
.
FLD2003-10055
2005 GULF TO BAY BLVD
Wayne Wells
562-4504
Print Date: 01/15/2004
3 of 5
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
NotMet-:J<.
Not Met
Not Met
CaseConditons
Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW f\\.b~ ~ Not Met *
Section 6-104.A for nonconforming signs states that "In the event a building permit is required for
the redevelopment of a principal use/structure, or a principal use/structure is vacant for a period of
180 days, signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance by
obtaining a level one approval in accordance with the provisions of Article 4, Division 3." A
building permit will be required for interior remodeling to combine the two tenant spaces for R & W
Pawn and Ace America Cash Express. Additionally, a building permit will be required for the
proposed site improvements. In relation to the above comment "g" regarding signage, what
changes are proposed to existing freestanding and attached signage? At a minimum, the
addresses on the freestanding signs should be reoriented to read horizontally rather than
vertically; those panels on freestanding signs that are not a white background with red lettering
should be changed; and those attached tenant signs that are not on a white background with
individual lettering should be changed.
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW ~ tA- ~ Not Met '*
Show the visibility triangles at all driveways, including those for the daycare on Hercules Avenue
and the driveway on Rogers Street, an.d at the intersections of Gulf to Bay Boulevard/Hercules
~venue and Hercules Avenue/Rogers Stre~ Revise the visibility triangles on the landscape plan
to Code size of 20' x 20' and to Code locations.
12/4/03 - WW 1) ~ Not Met
Address/show the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. Coordinate with landscaping. Outdoor
lighting is required to meet the requirements of Sections 3-1301 - 1302.
12/4/03 - WW V ~ Not Met
Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required screening.
If located on the roof, note such.
12/4/03 - WW \) ~ Not Met
Provide traffic flow arrows and signage (including "do not enter" signage) to indicate one-way
traffic flow for the daycare.
12/4/03 - WW )) fv-Sl- Not Met
Show the number, length and width of the daycare van parking space(s), as well as any other
parallel parking within this area of the site. These spaces should be included in the parking count.
12/4/03 - WW N.QSL Q Not Met ~
Owner will need to complete and record a Unity of Title document prior to issuance of any building
permits.
12/4/03 - WW V a-.r-'L Not Met
Revise site data table on Sheet 1 for "side (south)" to "front (south)" and to indicate a 25-foot
setback is required.
12/4/03 - WW \) ~ Not Met
Indicate on the site plan (or other appropriate plan) all required parking lot interior landscaping
crosshatched or shaded, including the area of each interior area being calculated.
12/4/03 - WW \)~ Not Met
Revise the landscape plan to indicate the amount of interior landscape area is being provided
(revise "open space provided" to "interior landscape area provided", se Comment #aa above). A
minimum of 10 percent of the paved vehicular use area is required.
12/4/03 - WW V~ Not Met
Coordinate the landscape plan and the site plan as to pavement versus landscape area where the
five-sabal palms are proposed at the rear parking area near the "parking/service area."
12/4/03 - WW \) ~ Not Met
Indicate the existing/proposed use of the second floor of the "daycare" building.
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
.
.
FLD2003-10055
2005 GULF TO BAY BLVD
CaseConditons
Print Date: 01/15/2004
4 of 5
Zoning Condition Wayne Wells
12/04/2003 12/4/03 - WW N ~ ~
When resubmitting the application package for the Community Development Board (COB), please
include a reduced landscape plan to scale (8 % X 11), in color, for COB presentation purposes.
12/4/03 - WW ~ bt- ~
Provide wheel stops and concrete curbing adjacent to landscape areas in the parking area in the
southeast portion of the site.
12/4/03-WW V~
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions,
soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures.
12/4/03 - WW \) ~
Submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program application, addressing all criteria, based on the
requests outlined at the beginning of this letter (or as modified with revised plans).
12/4/03 - WW \) ~
Is there any outdoor seating for Captain's Pizza?
12/4/03 - WW N u-\.. \c Io-~ ~ \0 (' ,-\'-1 Ut
Code requires foundation I~ndscaping of a minimum width ofVive feet. Any ability to provide?
May need to include in the request and include as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program
application. (DRC note: If the five-foot wide area adjacent to the building cannot be provided, the
request will need to include "a reduction in the width of the required foundation landscaping
ajjacent to the building from five feet to zero feet.)
12/4/03 - WW \) ~
Revise Sheet L-1 to indicate Rogers Street on the south (not Turner Street).
..
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
12/04/2003
.
.
FLD2003-10055
2005 GULF TO BAY BLVD
562-4504
12/4/03 - WW
Indicate through a narrative the proposed building improvements.
12/4/03 - WW \) ~
Landscaping shoulabe added outside the existing chain link fence along Rogers Street adjacent
to the daycare playground.
12/4/03 - WW ~
Compact parking is not provided by Code. Revise to Code parking space dimensions (9' x 19').
(DRC note: See Comment 3c under Traffic Engineering.)
12/4/03 - WW N Wa
Added at the DRC meeting: If there is no formal cross access easement with the property owner
to the east for the access between the two properties close to Gulf to Bay Boulevard, it is
recommended to record a cross access easement. Cross access between properties is a very
important traffic circulation element that improves the level of service for adjacent major
roadways.
Print Date: 01/15/2004
5 of 5
Not Met -*
Not Met "*'
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met *
Not Met
Not Met ~
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met -%:-
CaseCondilons
.
g'~
N l'f)
;:::; on
,.-..I ...:..:
~ ~
..... l)Q
OJ) C
.S! 00 >
..... 0-, ..J
f:I) 0-,_ m
.... >:
~ '<
C m
:E ~~ ~
..... LL
CJ ..J
< ~::::l
~ ~ C)
f:I) ~ It)
~ 4IS 0
U U ~
~~I
-0
........,
~ "
~.
...,
"@
~
~
Oll
I::
.~
"0
~
I::
'-'
o
Or/)
~o:l
g;~
--
.....
......
s
'"
~
'"
i::
B
Q)
.l:l
g,
~
~
0"0
:-5 ~
:g ~
<z
o
o
00
<
~
U
o
o
o
~
~
-
'"
~
I::
'm
.s
o
-
'5 ~
","0
~:B
:g"O
-'0
....J'~
~~
oU
!S..o
~--
l;;
~u
U .S
~ S
'S'i
ar .S:!
..........
Ollc..
.S ~
~~
.....
o
Or/)
~o:l
~~
--
on
r/)
~
o:l
~
~
'"
i::
B
Q)
....
'g.
~
c;
5-0
:B ~
-0 Q)
"0 Q)
<z
o
o
00
j
u
o
..ijj",] ~
~ ~ ...........
';;J;l=ooi7l
'O"'8a~Q)
t; E gj -8' 8:';;
o]:s;!!I.l"'S
E_Q)-a.s
~:s;!~tJ!"O~
~5~Q)~~
,.\<i~';;';;I::U
~ vi' 'ti! .s :s;! .8
Q)S~~i5Oll
~ (5 ~ ~ ~ .S {3
ai-: ~~ ~~
o~~I::';;~8
~~~~~~IE
,;~",,"OQ)o
fr ~ _ 5l iP7i Oll
8 ~ C' ~ - ..s
~ biJ-~86
_ ~.s ~ 1;j IE l'I
OEE50ao;
o l'I.2 I:: 'ti! 0
~~.;;_r.;:::,;;.s
S ",.~ ~ '" .s .~ 0
..... ~ 8 ;.c; ~.~ ,.\<i f-
.8~SQ)~~83~
J;l .S ~ ~ ~ tJ! ~_
8.. [g ~ ] a'~] ~
r/),D"O 0:1.0.... ",r--
.....
o
Or/)
No:l
V'i~
~
.....
......
o
0......
N I
V'io:l
N
--
r--
r/)
~
~
o
o
l:l
o
Z
Q)
s::
o
Z
.....
o
o
N
--
on
N
--
.....
......
o
o
N
--
on
N
--
r--
......
c;
U
l:l
,g
j:l.;
o
o
IQ
j
U
o
Q)
.~
-
o
Z
c;
~
l:l
Q)
P:::
o
......
o
U
~
U
o
~ ts ^
Q),g"O
.S S'~
[gU&
.0 ;>. 11>
....r Q) ....
Q:) .s I::
.> Oll.g
~'E s
en ",'-
.... Q)-
Q) ;::l c..
~ ar ~
-...."0
~ 0 !is
Q) ~ 0
S""co
.... ~ '5
N_l==
9+-'6..
...... 6 0
0",_
" Q)
~ kl ;.
.!:: ~ 8
::l _ ;>.
0-",_
Q) .-
.... 0 I::
"a - ::l
;. "0 E
o I:: E ::I:
....8..0 U
~~~~~
~ '0 0ll!Q o:l
.;: I:: .:: ~ N
~~2{33
......
o
Or/)
No:l
~~
N
......
N
o
0......
N I
t:::o:l
......
--
......
r/)
~
o:l
s
'"
~
s
'"
~
N
o
o
N
--
r--
......
--
.....
'"
i::
B
Q)
.l:l
g,
Q)
P:::
c;
5-0
:€ ~
:g ~
<z
Q)
.~
-
o
Z
c;
~
l:l
Q)
P:::
c;
s::
~
o
o
00
j
u
o
on
on
o
U
~
U
o
.
~
~
6
'i
]
'0
'"
.a
,g
'"
Oll
.S
19~
",.0
I I
8rl.
IE Q)
0"0
Q) Oll
e! .~
~~
8 ~
.s~
c 's
i7l"O
.... I::
~ ~
,.S:!,D
N
o
Or/)
~~
~o:l
--
r--
r/)
~
o:l
~
Z
o
o
-0
'0
::t
N
o
o
N
--
o
N
--
IQ
i::
Q)
r/)
....
Q)
;::
Q)
~
~
u
o
o
'"
'"
:::E
~
u
o
::I:
~
<
co
""
~
N
o
>-
i:L.
N
o
Or/)
~u
~f-
--
r--
Q)
s::
o
Z
N
o
o
N
--
r--
N
--
r--
Q)
.~
-
o
Z
......
'"
~
l:l
~
o
.....
o
U
~
U
o
~
i-
.s:
..,
"
<:
1A
'"
u
""
8
N
I
N
o
o
~
i:L.
,...
o
Or/)
~u
~f-
--
o
......
N
.....
o
Q)
[?Jl
~
s
'"
~
,...
o
o
~
00
.....
--
o
Q)
.~
-
o
Z
~
l:l
Q)
P:::
-0
=
o
U
Q)
r/)
o
on
o
U
~
U
o
.
g ~
s ~
...... ,.:..:
:::. 0
..... ciO
.
'!;! ~
.,g =
"0 (I)
(I).D
'!;! >-.
u o:l
~ S
= OIl
.- =
l! 8
"'i1J
]~
(1)"0
u~
l@'!;!
",..c::
-~ -^
~ ~
u'.;:
~5
~~
'!;! ....
>-.~
..sgf.
~..96
..c:: 0 '.g
.~ c:: ~
~ (I) =
(I) !a &l
~>-.~
~.s ~
.~ QC ~
..... Q\ ..J
.~ ~ m
~ <= ~
C~m
.... ~ 0
~ ~;
-( :it ::)
~ Q,l C)
~ ~ It)
~ ~ 0
U U ~
~
Cf.l
~
00
o
<"'l
<"'l
I
00
v;
N
I
,-.. .
g~
~ ~
~g
su..
o (I)
<J:::.;::
"5h~
::1.8
..9 o:l
~ ,~
~~
""<8
:E ,9
.;::gf
'~ '€
(I) OIl
8.gj
'" ~
N
o
OCf.l
~~
--
N
.....
>-.
I:
o:l '
~6
8 ,~
'6 b'o
s ,~
~~
8 ~
S ~
g~
c.......
8 0
~~
-s~
8 o:l
<J:::Wo
8 0
~ -
<t
..c:: 0
- ~
'~ '"
~:s
~.s
N
o
OCf.l
l::::!:>
~....
N
.....
Cf.l
>
......
~
Z
o
o
(I)
=
o
Z
N
o
o
l::::!
N
--
N
.....
.
o:l ..
S 1;1
._ u..
...c: .
.~ ~
>< -
o:l ,-
<+-< OIl
I I:
<"'l '!iJ
00 ,~
"i S
<"'l"t)
o OIl
"i I:
~ a
r- (I)
~...c:
~ Sl
u -
:::1: !o
(I) l$
~~
B]-N
=8~
a ,.., r-
13 '.. -.0
F.'oN
:3 ~~
~8~
N
o
OCf.l
~~
--
N
.....
Cf.l
>
......
~
5
o
~
o
Z
N
o
o
N
\0
--
N
.....
.....
o
8
v;
]
-
.~
(I)
'"
::I
'!
~
t
~
0..
o
.:: &!
tE ::I
I: u
,- '.J:l
~~
8-
log
Cl ~
~ !o
"O..c::
(1)'0
~ !ij
.
~
i>
'5:
''''
<
~
"
u
Cf.l
>
......
~
5
o
~
o
Z
N
o
o
N
--
'<t
--
N
.....
N
o
OCf.l
~~
--
N
.....
'<t
o
--
<"'l
o
<"'l
o
OCf.l
l::::!u
::E-<
--
r-
9
o
:I:
N
.....
o
N
~
A...
~
:I:
~
o
Z
<"'l
o
o
l::::!
.....
.....
--
r-
......
o
o
l::::!
0'1
N
--
.....
......
o
o
l::::!
0'1
N
--
.....
=-= .... ~ (I)
,~
~~j (I) -
';;: 0
..... - - z
~ ~ ~ ~
u u u (;j
~ (I) ~ OIl ~
= .~ (I)
..8 ..8 ..8 =
~ (I)
A... A... A... r:r::
Cl; 0 0 0 0 0
~
-~ 0 0 0 ..... .....
.... \0 \0 \0 0 0
~ j j j l::!:l U
....:l ....:l
U U U U U
0 0 0 0 0
.
,.
~
5
~ Z_W'l
~ i ~ ~n
i:: ~. !!I .:;K
D:i ;s 0&&
f i<e s. Iii :>l~~l;..
e~15 ...~
!i w 11-
. e8 uli'r)
· s:ai ~ Ur
C,.) :a..........
. ~ ~...~...
... ~ Do ~ ~fi
,~.
.. ~ ~~,
;.~
,~
'"
.. "
=l--
.
.-
.".
..
.
.
..
.... ....
--
'"
I
I--
:
I--
-
:=:I I m'"
i~ os i !
UJ K. ""'
R - =
.lL.. :
.
~ :~i~ .! i ,
JI!g:ldh "!.
j.-;oJ!.....l~ lis....
UA".rr.sSil. r
"OJ:':tA5';'il H
8:fhsi5J il
s &." :...g!z Q..
"f-i.5i-i1 - . 'Ii
.A illl....~..1 .s!
J~~f~::J. mIl
H.i~ 1!~i!.' 1-.; i
~hJ!:f!~~.i .~~:r
ij!Hjf.l~ Ii
HiHnJI21 ~I
E:"'. !'Jll '0 .z I
Ii ~i;:j2,," · '!:f
-l "",,;JI:P~f
I ~~llji=&f. !
o
o
...
~
o
~
zEIj .
o
..
'-
~
III
i:i
z
w
c.:>
W
...J
~
0-
~
~
!I
i:!
II
OVOll ~.__
~/m[
~
I'" -A
/: ::OL
::,.
: :: i,
I ~~;* :.
-:.. tlilii:
I ::.....~.
I i~r... lei
'VI", ~ ! $I
(;1;1; ~ _! ~I!I! -
lill 51 a a ii !I ill! I ~ i
(jjliiliila i! !! :;1!l1~1~
os Ir~ illE!Hi ;;llll"I..I"llil a )DJ.llllll!!!i lI!1I~I!iI!
Ill! i ~Iii ~ llliOllll ltllll!! i'i//..... ~ iI l! . !!i 11:\
rlillil!!l~ ll,. Oil!! ~U,fliilal,...... J ~ ~! ilili
~"" 1111 il !I! ~ i ;1; ; I!~~) ~ ~ e 1} ~ !I ~H
51 t: r iiliH I ~ ~ ~ ;1 e 51!1 1:1 5\( ~ ~ In!! l! il SI :
ill llll ~rlU it ~ 11 "Ill lil !1l!ililJ 1!l1;1 iii lil a !Ill !!I ~I:i
iiil~li ~ 1ii'!i/OlI~lii fi/J .I!$I!I al Eil ~ ~ !! !I ~Ii ~
e ~llll~I!I; ;:~'='~llilllll!IB ...... ~ i:1;lii 5 5 = !! ~ ~
... s I ! I ! >I; rd 1:l~Y31I1fHl.;1 ;1 l f"f&-cih I ~ ii I! I! ~ n
~ "-
i . ,ill I;; n ~l 1. ~ I ill E a 11 !! !ill! fl 2
lIaWIi3.-- al!llil!l!!lilli!
.I) Ii 5 Et:: !i a 5 i i i i
~~: l.lda!!ll!! liii
!! ~&
IllI8NWB rs !i d5ii !! a !! i ili i
S l i i 'I if i ~ ~ ! ~ ill i
.. ...
-
~J
I~
'= II ::-.....\:: ~
.. ~ 2
H ... - '.11..
. ~ ::;;;
~ I ~...- 7"'q,!!
~ f I ~.~ N ~ ..
mf-::' i I ~ ~ .... \
~..; i
L-t ~~. li....~1 I
:; I' ~~
:::;::::1
- ~~
U1W
- I ii:2 U
I ~
~I
.,
.0
o
--
a
M
o
~
~~~-
/to.
-
....
-
I
~
.....
-
II
-
r
LJOl NO'I "'" reo.. ... .tCOl1_1.
;.. r-,..; ~..: .:.. A so:; ...
I -I I ~...., ........ ~
t:; H ~ .., 01 ~ 0 OS.CD
_ ~ ;.,.. N_ ___ ,.._ ~
~ I 1--::1 ~. ~ -~ 2 ~ 'u: fi;
? ~._~ \ll- Ii $ :!- IS ~
-.... l!l ..~ ....;.. Q N- l!~ --::;
~ I ~t;' ~ a t::;::-... ~ '"
.!-... ~~ - j! "':!!: ;;- ~ Nil.
-=.... ~..;- N ;,,;. - - B r--- ~ g
N & II) tn.:. ... IE
~aG ~ iN CIS -:.- 1Ilo-.- a
.......... y .IDIl: _ _d 0ftIII I
........~~~ i ,} ,} ~= ~i o;j:;/I :;:1 ...
>-. = . Zl/z. . .IIZ.
o:~ ~ I~-". ..,I ~. ~ ~9 :!. r~'"
~ : ~ =JI-004 ~ Ijl~~ ~. - :~w.I~ . -
.......;' Ib .
~~ ~:; 1...' ..! ":aixi~~ N~ -....
~ ~.) ~.. 6O/Z.. Nor
:!-'
l!!
~
~
i
01
...
~
~
o
..
~
'!!i1A N
i' ~.~" l::
:! ro..
~
.
j
... :' ~
N .
e
...
Z
::;
~
'i
::J
t:t:
'50
~'" ~
g:~.~
I~ <
<< ~
~d
IH
" ~~
" aD
iii e ~
88
~
'"
....
(l.
o
'"
(l.
o
i
o
>
>-
o
~
>=
<
i5
Iii
....
o
"
Z
~
N
'"
.... III
OJ III
:2 ... III
:> '" >-
Z 0 'i
- l:i ~. ::;
o >- t:
cd 9 a
I
I
,
,
,
>-
Z
S~ a
~I!! ~
ilia <
...
Z
::;
...
Z
2
r."<<"1
111
UiJ
~.~I
@~
299A .
~ !
::: .r~ ..
'Y
=li ~i !
. ;t . =1
0"1 _. N ..,=
~ ~ ~ ~
..
II
II
i\ ~a = .... ..,",: -
~\: ~:if on ~
....
_ G _:
piii" _-.: N on
~......::.... N ~ ~ l.::l '!I",;a
~ ...:; ~."" ...-:..
Il... ...
~ ~
..-- ~...
.. ....
:ll
!I!'-:'
i!l .. &
1-
lA
~ '-; <C
~
r--..
~
D:ft 2
~ .....
>.. c:t
~ i ~f-o
z'" ~ N_
~ -:r;
.... ~~
----.oii ....
...
N
~
:; ~ 1ft _:::,
~.-- ~ ;; ~~
~~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ;:.~
li.... ~~
~ :;~ -=-
.... iiii1!l ....
51; )00 ~~ ~
.....,. S....~ ;::..... III .
~ ~:~ i-
r:.- ~ f!.- dII::
.-
~
~..
:l:
1-::
.,:
- 00
I
..
eo
..
N
3I\1IIlI ....
~ i ::;1 ..a ~I :::1 ;7;1 Ill: ::
~
I-
I-
.. 'r~j_... ".~I;\..._ ...
!Ii ~i III' II i
10 00 ~-
::! ~
~
:
-
2
~ i
.._i!!li l,! ,: Lll ':!
.- ~ ~ ...= ~ - ~
(..-
II
iaw - ;,
r!l!....
ii
..
ii
N
Ii
" .
li
~I
... ..
-I:: ci~
i ! i
OVOll
-
II
~
a .. II ~.. f-L,::!
.@ !! S!:e I~
_ N .... ! rg
II. II.
II II
"
. ~
~ I
__ 00
IBCnII
:;:
001-
:;:
.....
.
...
....
~
- ---
:Jl :e
r
!it -.... fIIR
l!I ... ~~
UN. ~
co IQS'
-:;
~
.;:u
~ = ~...~
~ :
~... 0 a ~
;; 0. a ~ '"
-"'~ .,,~
~. ~ ,.
~ /' ::i~ ...:;;:
-.". ~ ~ ~
.... F""~. ::!iA"
III l: :!IN !! I
...-- I~!: ~- ~
'" 2 ...:~ - "
,..~ ~,~D ~
:=.. :! ~..
..
N
..
,..
r--
...
..
..0
o~
~N
5~
....<0
Ira
CD
V> 00
<(0)
~N
<(-II
ZIaJ
I''' ~."
....., 0-
~ bf I
Z ~.:
o .N
N~I
'--
l;f~
~- fa
~r ~ -;- -=-
-:-~
~ -.u
~.
~~-
-;' S :: .....
~~
~; ...
.q;
~
...
~
::;
~
~
..I ..ill...~ ..'\~ II
~ ~Jt~ N \
_ I I I.d... ..
i N il ... il! '1' ~ ! ~
IJ1000II '
:! ~ l! i :: ~
.. ~
... ~ .. ~
oil ; 11 ~ ! ... ; !:
I..::" ~ ~ ,... ~ ~ : :! ~.~ ncrI
_C't......IlI'ID.......~ '~ ~:4'C...It\CI,...
ii = 12 " ~ _ = i II I ~ - .. ~ ~ _ ~ Ji ....
;::u .... ...... ........ t::IIBL~:: 11 ;,..
... lO!Ii! ..... III ,... eo !t ,...~ ~ :i
~....::!o :;:: ICZ' E L--
,......, . __'EN 0hJI';; snR Cta ICOI (ic1 a 11'11I'0 WDI '-GirID
.. ~ (h ~o 0 ID I:;;' ~o. ::!
..: ;,- ..~ e""' ....'3. ~ Ii" .. .. .. :"" SI.... 19 ;'00 i::: ~..-;
'0 ..-: (... ..;;?'( :;:.... ": (~..=.. i ..... ( !1 :;:"" ",... (!;)._- ~I ~
lIfR IUM ZIOI I n_ WCII ~ ;'14Z Q ZIOZ II. ~ zt~ Q uor--..
i l"'lI 10 UN.... N .... ~ g N ....0 ~ e .....
~N: ~. - l!l- ~..... ~- ~ -N ~ Q"" -;;;. .... ~
.. i N"::100 S N ~~ ~ NCrI <iDOl ... ! ?:r ~ '~
1-4 ~ ~_ t -H ~ : '-- /~. :....- .-.0'-. -:.-! _~ ~;! ..I,,~
nG\~ S31I"OlI3Il ~ ~
l L..m_J.i r~~......L---__; -.vJ~ :=':J-'--T-~ - jr -- I" r ~ '..-: - , : -. .1 ~, - ..~;\
- _...~,",___m"'IQolit:lS Hi)IH ~3!V 'lI:to · i-: ..-~ 1:1 Dl.......... I 0
r 1". ~.': r..... _nO.. : : I ~~''''':'~. 1:"1 ~ 110 n ~ ~ ~ I~' J"')
i: i j :........---..--.........--........: I I I " . , I :'D. - (\If N r-- r-
-L'I86(; V .4
___ t<>d'a6JaW-S-U!6ua 'swepe9 'I'N 6~:'i'i:O~ ~OIE~R:O '6Mp.8116~sVll'^a\f:)Oln'^NmN3\:s
AOtNI'UlN
-:.
~i toti _!
- ":
m
lO
o
I'")
~
2!a! lIQNM
VI.. IC... ....
! @ G.&OI"
:II
,
. .
2''' -0.
I
11
.
. ~.. . ~ I!....
...-. !< iii ~ ~H
I .. ~ 0> li~
... ~~t! :~~l;~
, t.. !jl!~ w<lSll~'
.. t to) 8 h~ i~l
~ ~~I f~wilt
.... <.> ,."'!
~ >0 ::l ..E~
~ .~ ....~ff
, :. i
<uJ (,\,,~ j
- Q
,.!
. -;.>....
I..: ~ ~= 0't0lI ~.It It lDI01lII- 'N
. ~ W fIR . _ III I ..
D5 -..Il '__
/' .. ~ 4.. ~ '"
I - ~ ?
~ :: :.- /1 '''' ~
, ~)I,.'.. -''It.,
. IUO",T-"
I __- o!',p
1= _
/ '" ...'" -:?~ 6'0....
~ ~~..... .
_~ ;/>./'v~
I T"
, -
\I 3NG\.. NIItII 'N
I U I::,~!l~!!l ./......."
~ .11 ~~ ~.,~ ">
/' \I E..3I\~!~ i..._... "-"""_15 'N
IS 99 OSIl II ....
i'~~ ~:>;JvJ.~ ~ V'J i
..~J =.
. l.; u~ ~ e
n;llli.! ~ I
l! g- I> t ...! : ~
a':::if1at 00"
:aiur::.j H
o".n t5 :I I
~5l161jZ t....
~f~IIII~1 ;ji
1~5~1iI"IJi :Oll"U
H~Aallil: ~--.
a~ 05 :~s:.. 1:; ~
.1).11111'''& .I11'li
.!!1~:Z "IS~~Ji 'j"
ifll-;;tlh." . it
Hii~n!a jl
!:I~I;;8il'l .!'r
~i'" ]2:1.;; It ~!
uunl:;~lo:j ..
~hhiliiE: .!
e
zEB ~ !
o ~
o (.)
'" '"
i!'i
CD
:2
:>
z
~
::i
III
t-
;i
...J
>
t-
e;
I
I
I
I
I
I!J
s
::J
~~
....u
2>",
"'....
4.t-
I~
'"
<(<(
......
~d
~i
<(t-
ilia
I
... .
~..
y
-:. I '"
~ , ~?
~~II ~
~ ,I r~1 ~1"
l l/ I III 'll~~~/lg ~." "".'" )'. ::..
__ · [,00. ~ ill ~ Y HD'lUC A\'E. Ii
.... 13 ~': \~ ~ 2.
I... fla:: \. r-.,..~ - NI.:\.""....
I .... I e ~ , ~>\ \ ----t ~ .. ~;I ....
~ ~ (.)- {l.,. a - .9 9 C --.. ~
ail ~'I - ~ H_ .. ~;> .... - .. . . ~
~ I ~ ~~ ~~: .'~ ; ~ ; -: " .::'.<1.' ,'.".,, ~'
~~}~i.~ ~tI",j~ ~;:~-:....... "(i):_..3..3",:~_~~~-
, ~ -;\ - n........:t~ ~ e Ii: It
~ ~ Ii - :"IB'\V " " :-N ~ 'N" ~ . JI\NJA"
~ .. "l:" . ~ " . ~ ~ ......" ~ II " _r-. p " ,. " ~....
31 : ~ I 9~:,~ ~ - ~ .. - -... b~ ~ ~.;- ~~.. "'2 ~:: ~..: .. .... .. :,~ ~ ~ .. ~ coli e ~ ~ ~ ~
IS _ ~ ~ "(D;-.'~I>'\I' ~ ~.. ~ . 6", ~~ ..J.ll_J~I~ 01; ~~ -5 ;HR
: ~ :::]n;v Ii !! :I'H:). ON" ". ~ .. ..~:t:.
O ~ 1;;"'-, ~ ~ :~: ~ II l! :: "~ Iota" S!: ~ :!! ;; 2,../t\.,= 2 ; ~!
, JDi I ~ N ....--..,....(DW'l... Itl ,.. II) "'"ta ... N ,.., .. n to .,t:/ 01 0 ::
I BJlS31:l N D I S A a B r S J. S 3:) J }I IS
',WJiI Ji"d";:) ....~__ N ..,~;.~~'^~ /Ole ': ~...:W -...::....~ '^~ e to ;.... 1O(~(Jl! ii5? i- ~
411IIIII JOB
.&.. _ ~~v_ _ ~ ":'N_ - _ - _3IJ!G'-L--;~t 1r.>- - - -
~
~NR.. "I~::<O/I~ ~N-"~ ..H; ",2..2.,~~. 2 DO. u: ,,:..,": ,^2~., ":1",~..2 2-};;
II' ~ '~"
..
.
J~
!
II
!
~,
~.
.lie"
+~ '
~ ~ ,p,~- ~oo O,p
~~ ~~ --
~.s\.. i$>
_r~!j._
'3>Q" ~_
U ..
;; It .
',f:
"
IE
~
lU !I ~ ii ~!I~! - sI' ~
,.;.... N -~I~'I t"t
~ ,'^ !..~;H;!ilt 2. ~_
- sner 'S
~
'"
~
'"
4.
'"
i
o
>
t-
o
x
....
z
z
<(
o
t-
t-
Z
....
:>!
....
....
'"
'"
<(
z
o
;::
<(
is
iii
....
o
'"
z
~
N
51
III
III
...
'"
'"
~
~
Cl - g
~ ill
'-'
W
-!
t-
9
o
@~
290A ~
! !
~;
r'i
~
....
:::
:::
:::
~ !;
l!
!
-
GO. ,..../ r.... ":]..1 . ....J 8 I
.._-~---- .,,--~-_. c ~: I
la.. i ~ G::J =!
~:::::::-,-] Ill: ~ ! I
I .. ili WC~ II
i 8' [Ji 1 ~~ i!
Iexll-IIICD :~
: :.g i i
- I::: ~Ji
r ] rJ': k-z-i \.-~---': :
OJ I ,~ ....... ----~ I I
"'f'~ l:~r~:!
jt ltt ~_.\~ If
... 1 L_ t I\.,.-- .
! ~!' f::I2ID r1~~~~
Eltf'J 0 t II r
~..wtWr.J ~ - C~ ~
fJ~ ILJ~~0LE-]El~m
_u..{ H1ros ~
W-a:J5- [j3ffiJ[]][U
CIJ~ i?./~
IIJIC7BI 'S.
~~ ~
Q.o
,
1-4
.. w
~ ~~
Cu-
o
Kt-LnII
.
-
r:rl
Ii],
-
ti
..
~
~J;'
..",,__ Ii",~::--
". ...~: ,," $"i ". "'I aJ 2. :_
3NlIloGN II
e ell .<1:\ ~ ~; ~ _ I 5! i ....
eo') ... on \:p- ID .... . _ . ;:
.0 1 ...<b.:_ ,.N.IO~ a 0 ~
lit It '\:=-J'!it e :t ii i - noI
....
.... .
. J f---
~ ~I aoz
.. . .. I ::? ~
-G ~ ~ ~r~~ ....
.;'~rwr~~.a I
... c-." lozo/c, ~
- ....
~
~
....
Z
~
...
~
N
ii ~
i ;
e
ii t
n
B
..0
S~
III c.l
5~
~~
CD
(1)0)
<(OC>
~N
<(-
Zw
0\ ~lI)
- u-
Z In I
Z l!s::
o ,.N
N~,
;'~ . ;.
lti
...;l~
-
.."
II
;;;;- ~ .,.
?:.
-! ~
Ii'!
~=2 ~ ~
~ '"
....
-
WI')
z_
IN' "'I~Ld\;1 I~"
"' ,<(
Ilt tn loll" l . ~ Iq:
c~][ ... ... ...1 ~'?rlr~1J .... i: ~
.. .. Uf 1M .It..J LlE....lJ J
II
105 ,,~
::
a_II
liil
i
D~
i~
D
~
!
~.." OS
!
/
:i~ ~
:!~ ;!
..
..
i
...z
::i
~
II
act-.c.s:RZ
IW" 'S
::!
_.J-"'~
r I
I I
I
I
..n
:::
~
11
-,
I
I-
~""""~
I
....."... I I..
- !. :~.
..-. ~ II' I:=::I~
*"' I """"to
.. ~ -- ~
.. """ ... ..I :....~
'"'I
"'om _"'r.or -/
ell z co..
~ 0 ....n
~..~I ~ ~ e:
! ;1- """ I
..,
f
~
3 3
1;::
AlIIClIlft
'S
r
,~
I
: I
""
ri ~i!i~
~ ..
I.....
I....
~
~
w
..
...
w
,co ,r-
~ i ~
....... 0>
....,.. N
V6Bl.... ~ w .4
t,Jd'a6~u!6ua 'swepea 'lNd l:17:61:~O ~O/l:~1W '6MP'86l/ZlSV11,^O\r-lOln\f'\NI~N3\:S
.... n . ~~a ~.~
~ F'" ~..
..
~
D: . ~ G~""
~ i ; ~l.
~ ~ Iii <:~
~It: &i.~\1i&!
~ ~ e~!a~'
to) B g~~igl
e ..",zcl:i
Iio.~i "o~...l.l!
o . -ill"
t,) ~~
>- :J UI!li:
f:: Do '" 8 ,,-
U ~ -f&
r:- ....~
,.- ,:tm
~ "bJ (,\.~
---
~ p
rl~r
M
. I
,. ~ GO
~~ ~
. ~lJ
~J ~
" ~
~:::: 5
~
~
~
2988 ...
~ I~ I N I 0'" J '_: I ~ - I N -... ... :! I I Nl ~ I""
e .....lj I - u - I.. i I.. -- :!...... [i t'"loo _- i;!: I'>' I ?: n
--=-----~----~--- :
. - t-- " ,~-o. i.... i N I" - ... .. ~~.. .. ~
-!-- .~~) rji' L-.l~! ~j L.---,J" j J -80 N - ~ ~oD N ~..... ....::l Oft _ II 2!
~-- i=I i "'1 ... a \ ~ nil ~:a ~ I_
i L ';=;-'" !5l ..... ..... ; -, 1 i L; . - lG'TTV ~;:;_ ..:: .a !II ~ ~~
, '1:I: I, ,. 'l I>> ~ ! .... ~....... '" .
...- . Ii; 0:' [" i j J: ~ _ il _\.\ 0 N'" It..- ~ ...
,---, Iii ani ~ ;l I =:.: lD '-mn;--\ on "'" j~N /HI ,_ In
,L.i[] rl'~_l I, !"IIIG ~ I fi-1.---L.J illl I.. 9N~~!~ ~~"' ~...- "':'~i N "I"-C: -::;::'HI ~'"
, l' 1 :,1 f! :,,: _-. :e :::!.. -. N
--.-----, " ' I i "I 1.:, ',', i i . i i i l! -. -= -._." ~_ I 0..
,:..- ..... il!:! : I ~ -----= ~
:i i lU '!rJ lllil U I I !'___m_j::::;:=~~~~=~{_~~~! '.. j" i ~ ~i i .... ~ ~m;.._:~..:" ~~ ~-=
i : i...... '_I ~. ,.--. f-f------l _ ,.,.;;....:! :: alA a" "'.. . ';' ~ ~ -N
; !! i--"!l [)i r'---l l: ! ~~~ c.. tal "'~ ..,~... ---..; ~
I r--__.J L 1!J ' , "':::, !:. "'_ W'I ~ :a I ~ ~ ~ an:l to' :.... '--------.:,_ ..~ It..!: I ...
; r: i l. -: I ': ': ': "'. i ! ~ i -<:... 1I -- ~ '""'-==..- s r
! ~ 1....-.. L-J" 0 L-! ... pA- 15 __
, , L 1'- ':: a - lJlI1M) lil I;u;--~o Ii ~
I ',h, " ;; , , "----"- '"
I I J: :: . :: H4I ,. ~I t;UI
. 1 - rl =";1 'r___u__u"' !! i .., i S\' i = ~ i .., I i I'"' -=;r- ~ J_ a:
' , .. . "-'::::==1 \ ~ ;t1 : :; ~:~ -:~; ~ i ~ I ~ RM ~ ~
~ ___m__J ~l . L.~__~~____~ """ _J: ;- :l III z" : _ .. r-.. ~
... . ] '. ------~ I i !l i I I ill.. ~i! .~~ ...
,,., I......:.......-.::::--:::::.:::::-..::::::::-:;:::r. I ;- :wIlD ~ -- - i- .
/,/" .,\\! ,I ...,. ~ ~
II : I ! ;i (] ::,i: 1 i I .2;I:ll II.. Ii I:: ~ N ; ~I i. Ir---:::: .' : il
\ \. / l i L::::::~.J =: ;:: ~p .., ~ - - :? :! ~ -,/' ~ ii, l!
\..\'" -"~/: I ~ t: !!I ~_
II ~<:::::::::l'-:-::-i:::::~/ sv~~ ,.~ ..' ~... ~~NfJ_~ ~ ~i ~ .: I ~ _ ~r- f/' ~ - ~
.ll,~ c...::, i '1 <l G . rr-ot _ ....
: _ Di~?JI! [] ~~ ~_~~!Ni~~~ ~~
[] L_..J~ ~..-~~~~::... .tAU-'.. '6.....4 1.../ I i II!:: ~ :! :::! 0IIl
~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ .i :;; i oI'"t'M !i!." ~
O eft == ~ ~~I~ ~ 41 J. D -.....v _
I ;::... ... N E. 3~.1.,. r l: - .--
I uo,~ /;l 0 I< SID: : ~ .l! It>> ~ . .. ~ . ~
e = B ~ ;;o! ! 9 : ~ i ::.-- ORNE g ... ;; I i - .. .. =
I It - -:if':I.! ~I i ~I ~:I .Li ~ ~!? ;: ~~::! ::!~
",= ~.;: N .., p, ~ ~ '" ~ iii '" ~ ...:1,,,,
II: !~! ! ! ! ! i ....... - ... ... ;;. r--"~ tn rc :')
,., .. .. .. ... '" .. I: II Ii co -- ! i i ~ ;: .-..
'MI- N"" "J!;;IlD.n"'II)N
uti .........~ r I"" !... e:" ~...!... == 3NG\V JN3IDf
~ ~ a J\I ~.:r = Jf'H]OO,,,TIl]W'l AlMS = !l - N i . Wi",," JlIl~:
... ..... ""'~-..... ""e
~ -----"=1'"" l! ... l! ! ol) _
./1 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~cto ~e :.
~ "'-...~ ~ ~ ~ < < ~ .- ~: ..,
~ ... :::: ~ ~ ::t :::: in..., ~.e n ........
'"': ::: ~ - 1ft "" ..... tA "" ~:::c
~ - - .~~ .
~~.... - Iii ! : h11 !.
It .. Jf'H]OO," OW1llIl\Id It
N~ ~ _
~ ~ !.;1 ':!,2 ~~ o~
... ~-..1 ....
~i _0
~ !:!: 'J 1.:
OWl O!> !:
.
.
71
~
oz.
-
a
..-.;;
f"""Jl![
-
...
-
<(-
0)1--
EO ·
Nt--
.....
~
14
o
A
~
~
...
tz
~
~
~
--
--
,
11II
o
(
~ ~!
~ I
~ ..
~
..
Lrg
~n..
~~ I
..
-
It
~
....
I--
Rot
..
I .::. ...
, -=:N
~ ~
N l
I
I
I~ -
,,.., .....
U~
~
_7
...,
.......,..
I(JRI
~~
.."
.,., ...
EE-
.
~ 1~~~ ! i a
i~l;ti".!! "
gs ioA.s':l 5 ~
.,&Gl...if a!
~==r!t$G. i
o !P'"la 1:'5'i 1 i!
5;U~8~5J H
~ 51; €ifz l:.::
:-t!h1ae! .!I~
IUi":a"!i ~nl
$~iJ iU~ i... h ~
Jtjc~.lli.!&.~ .I1~
.... ",.,fllD 3-i-f
iifl.!j :;i, Ie
d~.tt-1;-'fi "
;lU~h~ u !~
E .>O...JDil'li ~ E
Ii Hif-G@d . ~!
1 ....~li:~t~{ ~
a ~lliiiii!~ ...
~
~
::
:!
lit
:!
31110\" .
3IlVl ~
Y1N1!lY'1
~ _ 2
~ ~.. <.\0 .c....
~ ~ ~ ~
!.
to ~~
~ '0,4
~ ~
... ~}111'" ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
r.,. r.,. N IN t't
'4t1'), 2I1"'l ;;,.., :;'" :; 1""1
: 0Il0 \0 ... \0
~.. F ~_ I~ ; r:~ 01
"""CJI-.....-_tLu
ON.,
10 ~rrJ !t :; ;t~;:
UU
ID 00 ~
:i:;- N
.
.
~
.. c:n
S~
fl)C1
>~
~~
<(
(/)OC>
<(m
-IN
~t--
<(
zw
,,,. got>
...., 0-
Z l1: I
Z la.CIJ
O 0...
....N
N~I
:=..,
1/1-
l/I
...
'i
:J
~~
....0
2;",
cr...,
4....
I~
~\t
........
~d
s~
oUi
~...
Oia
,
Iw.1
W
~
'"
....
2;
'"
4.
o
i
o
>-
...
'U
x
..,
z
z
~
o
...
...
z
..,
;z
lJ
....
'"
"
~
zEB ~
o
o
..
b
o
..
~
F
~
is
Ui
....
o
<:I
Z
Z
o
N
-
lJ
Z
:;
l/I
...
'2
:;
>-
...
U
I
,
,
,
,
'"
w
al
;z
::>
z
Cl .. ~
Z 0
w iiI
t:>
w
...J
'-
l/I
l/I
....
'"
o
~
lJ
Z
:;
lJ
2
~
..
U
III
" ~~
" -t ~
Q a II
q~
€Ie
...
9
o
~
~
~.~
:::s
o
e~
....
::l
..
J
;
N
~
...
N
~ !
2
...
..gr--"'nw
(aJ 0 .,.
.nuMa
-~
~
i CD ~ " a W
..
.....0II8llN
~
~~
;;; ~~I 2:' ;: ~ :!
= ILo/~r ~ ~
~ b..1i ~n.I!~
e e' 2 r.lj 01 -.8 is iI!
___I~':)_~--=---
II:lo ... 01..(_ ..::E ... __t!ll!.C 1l!l&1""l1\Dto
~~ !!~ ~... 2~ ~ l't i.., i ~
-
LD
r---
o
t')
"""
1---
:! '&~ Li' &-
(;2 '2 at
..u C'---
8L6(; '"
(:J,h>lIJaU~-U!6ua 'swepea '11'I'" 9I1:9S:0~ ~OIE~R:O '6MP'\I96Z\S\fll'd\GV::>Oln\I\NmN3rS
''"I.
Pinel,lasCounty Property APp.er Information: 1329 15 5769000001
Page 2 of5
13 / 29 / 15 / 57690 / 000 / 0010
10-Noy-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:47:40
Ownership InforMation Non-Residential Propert~ Address. Use. and Sales
ROMA SQUARE INC
511i PATRICIA AUE
DUNEDIN FL 34li98-7813
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: ZOOI GULf TO BAY BLUD
of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Trac t: Zlili.Ol
sales froM 2001 - 2002:
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/IMp
Plat InforMation Ii /1.998 10.147/ 394 1.135.000 (M) I
19Z5 : Book 013 Pgs 004- 5 /1.983 5.5Z0/1.ZZZ 750.000 (M) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1.972 3.7liZ/ 111 85.000 (Q) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
2003 Value EXEMPTIONS
Jus t / Marke t: 3Z8.700 HOMestead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 3Z8.700 Tax ExeMpt %: .000
Other ExeMpt: 0
Taxable: 3Z8.700 Ag r icu 1 tural : 0
2003 Tax InforMation Land InforMation
District: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Clearlllate r View:
03 Mi llage : Z3.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
03 Taxes: 7.588.07
1) 100 x lliO 11.00 Iii. 000.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2003 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 . 00 .00
7.588.07 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 171i.000
2003 taxes will be :
7.588.07
Short Legal MIDWAY SUB LOTS 1 AND Z 3: N 30fT Of
Description LOTS 11 AND 12
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-scr3?0=I&a=l&b=l&c=I&r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p... 11/1 012003
Pine!las County Property APp.er Information: 13 29155769000001
Page 3 of5
13 / 29 / 15 / 57690 / 000 / 0010 :01
10-Hov-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:47:44
COMMercial Card 01 of I IMproveMent Type: Shopping Center
Property Address: ZOOI GULF TO BAY BLUD Prop Use: 3Z1 Land Use: II
Structural Elements
Foundation
Floor SysteM
Exterior Wall
Height Factor
Par ty Wall
Structural FraMe
Roo f FraMe
Roof Cover
Cabinet & Mill
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
Partition Factor
Spread/Mono Footing
Slab on Grade
Cone Block/Stucco
o
Hone
Masonry Pillar&Steel
Bar Joist/Rigid Fra~
Built Up/Metal/Gyps
Ave rage
Carpet Co~bination
Drywall
o
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fixtures 14
Bath Tile
Electric
Shape Factor
Quality
Year Built
Effective Age
Other Depreciation
Function Depreciation
EconoMic Depreciation
Hone
Ave rage
Rectangle
Ave rage
1. 973
ZO
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base A rea 1. 00 3.590 7) .00 0
2) Open Porch .30 1. OOZ 8) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Commercial Extra Features
Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 6800 1. 00 6.800 0 6.800 999
2) FEHC E 8.50 165 0 1.400 Z.OOZ
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 8.Z00
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][f]~~
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-scr3?0=1&a=1&b=1&c=1&r=.16&s=4&t=1&u=0&p...l1/1 0/2003
Pinel1as County Property APp.er Information: 13 29 155769000001
AURORA 1.0 10
AVE [i) illO
'\...-I 405 N ItvlBUS
rr} 0
0:) co CIRUS ,lI.VE
CIJ C\.J AVE
2010
144,SI I~~~ 220
u) 0
{i} 1996 LI)
GULF m ~~ (J 2030
2f4=lJ DB ['tl Il!' 3 1 Sy.Ubfl 0
24/07 - 11) uJ
-
100.1<1 !12\)(S') -1) liD 110 ~'2(J
Page 4 of5
TO
La.J
='
Z
LLJ
"
115.6
2001 2009
GT't r- GULr-
TO
~ff~ 'T
2017 rf)
GULF TO OJ
u'}
TO C) ClJ
lD
("J
511
-1ERCULES
AVE
Ie
ROGERS 222.6
STREET
r- - ~
57680 R~
~-~
I}) C,
'T
(\J ';J q
l..() l:-- ... \.."-l'
rr,
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?0=I&a=l&b=l&c=I&r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p... 11/1012003
Pin~llas County Property AP.er Information: 13 29 15 57690000 O.
Page 5 of5
Q.,';r
~
{\ ~ . ..;
"", ,,'~
'f
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
B(1,GktQS~(1,rch...P<:lg.~
NLt::.xplanation oftbis screen
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-scr3?0=1&a=1&b=1&c=1&r=.16&s=4&t=1&u=0&p...11/1 012003
....
Pillellas County Property App.r Information: 13 29 1557690000 O.
Page 2 of5
13 / 29 / 15 / 57690 / 000 / 0030
10-NoY-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:50:19
Ownership InforMation Non-Residential Property Address. Use. and Sales
ROMA SQUARE INC
516 PATRICIA AUE
DUNEDIN FL 34698-7813
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: ZOO9 GULF TO BAY BLUD
of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Trac t : Z66.01
sales froM 2001 - 2002:
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/ IMp
Plat InforMation 6 /1.998 10.1471 394 1. 135. 000 (M) I
19Z5 : Book 013 Pgs 004- 5 /1.983 5.5Z0/1.ZZZ 750.000 (M) I
0000 : Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
2003 Value EXEMP T IONS
Just/Market: 438.Z00 HOMestead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 438.Z00 Tax ExeMpt %: .000
Other ExeMp t: 0
Taxable: 438.Z00 Agricultural: 0
2003 Tax InforMation Land InforMation
District: C..... Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater View:
03 Millage: Z3.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
03 Taxes: 10.115.89
1) 150 x 130 11.00 19.500.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2003 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
10.115.89 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: Z14.500
2003 taxes will be :
10.115.89
Short Legal MID.....AY SUB LOTS 3.4 AND 5
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi-c1ick?o=1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&... 11/1012003
'..
Pil}ellas County Property APp.r Information: 13 291557690000 O.
Page 3 of5
13 / 29 / 15 / 57690 / 000 / 0030 :01
10-Nov-Z003 Ji~ S~ith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:50:19
Co~~ercial Card 01 of I I~prove~ent Type: Shopping Center
Property Address: Z009 GULF TO BAY BLUD Prop Use: 321 Land Use: II
Structural Elements
Foundation
Floor Syste~
Exterior Wall
Height Factor
Party Wall
Structural Fra~e
Roof Fra~e
Roof Cover
Cabinet & Mill
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
Partition Factor
Spread/Hono Footing
Slab on Grade
Concrete Block
o
None
Hasonry Pillar&Steel
Bar Joist/Rigid Fram
Built Up/Hetal/Gyps
Average
Carpet Combination
o ry lIIal I
o
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fixtures 16
Bath Tile
Electric
Shape Factor
Quali ty
Year Built
Effective Age
Other Depreciation
Function Depreciation
Econo~ic Depreciation
None
Ave rage
Rectangle
Ave rage
l. 965
20
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base A rea l. 00 7.457 7) .00 0
2) Open Po rch .30 1.580 8) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Commercial Extra Features
Description Di~ensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 6000 l. 00 6.000 0 6.000 999
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 6.000
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][f]~g]
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi-c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c=I&r=.16&s=4&t=I&u=0&... 11/1012003
'-'"
PL1].ellas County Property APp.r Information: 13 29 15 57690000 O.
Page 4 of5
r;
0 410
C.J () 405 NIMBUS
rr;. 0
- 0:) OJ CIRUS AVE
/1 (\j OJ AVE
2010
144,61 [~~~ 220
0
1'9'96 wi ~@f3 2030
GULF ill 0
lR'08 fY} I SrVJlfi 0
- u') lJ')
- -
[2Drs} <:;';3 \10 110 22'l)
411
I'lIMBU
,~V[
13/0f
S5 ~04
~Ud-
[3/0
TO
LaJ
::>
z
UJ
,
115..s 226
2001 2009
GULF GT~F
TO
~€t~5 ":t ~e~
20lj rr)
GUL TO ('oj TO
TO J::::~ ID
(.lJ (.\J I . I C' ~.o1'rs ('8)
{\J
511
-iERCULES
AVE - 118.~
{\J
[07 In
222.6
ROGERS STREET
~-~
57690 R~fWs
~-~
(J) 5T
""
(\.1 '-::-J q .Ac::<c)
'-0 L. '_.
fD
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-c1ick?0=I&a=l&b=l&c=I&r=.16&s=4&t=l&u=0&...II/1 0/2003
Pinellas County Property App.er Information: 13 29 155769000001,
Page 5 of5
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?0=I&a=l&b=l&c=I&r=.16&s=4&t=l&u=0&...II/1 0/2003
~ PineH:fs County Property APp.r Information: 13 29 155769000001
Page 2 of5
13 / 29 / 15 / 57690 / 000 / 0060
10-Noy-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:53:16
Ownership InforMation Non-Residential Propert~ Address. Use. and Sales
ROMA SQUARE INC
516 PATRICIA AUE
DUNEDIN FL 34698-7813
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: n17 GULF TO BAY BLUD
of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Tract: Z66.01
sales froM 2001 - 2002 :
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac / IMp
Plat InforMation 6 /1.998 10.1471 394 1.135.000 (M) I
19Z5 : Book 013 Pgs 004- 5 /1. 990 7.Z85/1.ZZ9 3.000 (U) I
0000 : Book Pgs - 5 /1. 983 5. 5n/l. ZZZ 750.000 (M) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
2003 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 3Z8.700 HOMestead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: . 000
Assessed/Cap: 3Z8.700 Tax ExeMpt %: .000
Other ExeMp t : 0
Taxable: 3Z8.700 Agricul tural: 0
2003 Tax InforMation Land InforMation
o is t r ic t: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Clearlllater View:
03 Mi llage : Z3.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
03 Taxes: 7.588.07
1) 54 x 130 11.00 7.0Z0.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 7.00 6.760.00 S
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2003 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
7.588.07 6) 0 x 0 . 00 .00
Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: lZ4.540
2003 taxes will be :
7.588.07
Short Legal MIDWAY SUB LOTS 6 AND 7
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-c1ick?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&... 11/1012003
... Pinen~ County Property App.r Information: 13 29 15 57690000 OW
Page 3 of5
13 / 29 / 15 / 57690 / 000 / 0060 :01
10-Nov-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:53:15
COMMercial Card 01 of I IMproveMent Type: Shopping Center
Property Address: ZOl7 GULF TO BAY BLUD Prop Use: 3Z1 Land Use: II
Structural Elements
Foundation
Floor SysteM
Exterior Wall
Height Factor
Par ty Wall
Structural FraMe
Roof FraMe
Roof Cover
Cabinet & Mill
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
Partition Factor
Spread/Hono Footing
Slab on Grade
Conc Block/Stucco
o
None
Hasonry Pillar&Steel
Bar Joist/Rigid Fram
Built Up/Wood
Ave rage
Carpet Combination
Drywall
o
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fix tures 7
Bath Tile
Electric
Shape Factor
Quality
Year Built
Effective Age
Other Depreciation
Function Depreciation
EconoMic Depreciation
None
Average
Rectangle
Ave rage
1.967
ZO
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base A rea 1. 00 5.4Z5 7) .00 0
2) Open Porch .30 570 8) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Commercial Extra Features
Description DiMensions Price Un i ts Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT Z400SF 1. 00 Z.400 0 Z.400 999
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: Z.400
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][!]~g]
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?0=I&a=l&b=1&c=1&r=.16&s=4&t=1&u=0&...11/1 012003
. Pinelliis County Property APp.r Information: 13 291557690000 O.
Page 4 of5
'"'-' I.," ,A\ll:. \
2010
I~Y~J~ 220
0
LJ:) 2000
co - I~~~
f") Pfbf3 c' 0
IJ] In
-
-').,,0 110 110 221]
I
II
13/0-51
a
,J) 2046 ro
GULF mJl
TO TC
13/0.5
110 ill
BAY
TO
La.J
~
Z
La.J
>
<(
115.6 226 I~
2001 2008
GULf" GULf
TO TO -01
~t~ q- ~~~ <.) 2
20lj rf} ",.J
~~ 0J TO ~
0 u;
0:..0 (\J I. 16 ~4'S(tJ
ru
511
-JERCULES
AVE - IIB.S
0J
107 If)
222.6
ROGERS STREET
=57690~ R~~ 'f
_ --.J 'f
UJ
'T
CIJ .;::, q .A. c (C)
ill L-. ,_
rD
! ~
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-c1ick?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&... 11/1 0/2003
PineJI,'s County Property App~.r Information: 13 29 15 57690 000 O.
Page 5 of5
5._ ~~f i:h. ~
;'" \\. \ '4.'."
-/ .,,~
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?0=I&a=l&b=l&c=I&r=.16&s=4&t=l&u=0&...1111 0/2003
--
.
P;.nellas County Property APp.r Information: 13 29 15 57690 000 O.
Page 2 of5
13 / 29 / 15 / 57690 / 000 / 0080
10-Noy-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:55:14
Ownership InforMation Uacant Property Use and Sales
ROMA SQUARE INC
516 PATRICIA AUE
DUNEDIN FL 34698-1813
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0
of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Trac t: Z66.01
sales froM 2001 - 2002 :
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/ IMp
Plat InforMation 6 /1. 998 10.141/ 394 1.135.000 (M) U
19Z5 : Book 013 Pgs 004- 5 /1.983 5.5Z0/1.ZZZ 150.000 (M) U
0000 : Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
2003 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 38.100 HOMestead: 0 Ownership 1. .000
Historic : 0 Use 1.: .000
Assessed/Cap: 38.100 Tax ExeMpt 1.: .000
Other ExeMpt: 0
Taxable: 38.100 Ag r icu 1 tural: 0
2003 Tax InforMation Land InforMation
District: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater View:
03 Mi llage : Z3.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
03 Taxes: 893.39
1) 50 x 130 1.00 6.500.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2003 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
893.39 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 45.500
2003 taxes will be :
893.39
Short Legal MIDWAY SUB LOT 8
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi-c1ick?0=1&a=1&b=1&c=1&r=.16&s=4&t=1&u=0&...11/1 0/2003
t
p,inellas County Property APp.r Information: 13 291557690000 O.
Page 3 of5
13 / 29 / 15 / 57690 / 000 / 0080
10-NoY-Z003 JiM sMith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser
Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10
15:55:13
Vacant Extra Features
Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) .00 0 0 0 0
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VA LU E : 0
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][!]~g]
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-c1ick?o=l&a=l&b=1&c=1&r=.16&s=4&t=1&u=0&...11/1 0/2003
f
llinellas County Property App.r Information: 13 29 15 57690000 O.
Page 4 of5
I '-'t'ty' C c"C"U
0 1.3/051
~9€ ljJ 2000 0
- 2030 2046
.UU" OJ 0 u}
r4>/08 r~ Pfbf3 ISfJ~4 0 GULr
1.1:J tf)
- TO
13/05
r$) " 110
','.) 110 22() 110
BA
fY}
OCT
TO
I.&J
='
Z
La.J
>
<C
115.6 226
'>OO~ ~8e~
GUL
TO TO I::~
~ec~ <:T ~~~3 0-
201} l'f} C\J
GUL TO C\J TO
TO () If)
,~ {\J I I (~'
cu . o.,d'&('$)
511 +
-lERCULES
AVE W- \18.5.
ell
107 UJ
,...,.................. ~~
c::.c. c:.o
ROGERS STREET
~C) 76RO~ o::T
L'- ~ =---.J R~~ -
o::T
m
"'1"
(IJ r') q Ac((:)
1O C. ',-,
[l-,
!
V 340.89
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?0=I&a=l&b=l&c=I&r=.16&s=4&t=I&u=0&...II/1 0/2003
Pinellas County Property AP~.er Information: 1329 15576900000".
Page 5 of5
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=l&a=l&b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &u=O&... 11/10/2003
---
. ~inellas q~mnty Property Apper Information: 13 291557690000 O.
Page 2 of5
13 / 29 / 15 / 57690 / 000 / 0090
10-Nov-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser U:Z9:58
Ownership InforMation Uacant Property Use and Sales
ROHA SQUARE INC
516 PATRICIA AUE
DUNEDIN FL 34698-1813
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0
of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Trac t : Z66.01
sales froM 2001 - 2002 :
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/ IMp
Plat InforMation 6 /1.998 10.1411 394 1.135.000 (H) U
t9Z5: Book 013 Pgs 004- 5 /1.983 5.5Z0/1.ZZZ 150.000 (H) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
2003 Value EXEMP T IONS
Just/Market: 11.400 HOMestead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 11.400 Tax ExeMpt %: .000
Other ExeMp t : 0
Taxable: 11.400 Agricultural: 0
2003 Tax InforMation Land InforMation
o is t r ic t: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater View:
03 Millage: Z3.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
03 Taxes: 1.186.19
1) 100 x 130 1.00 13.000.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2003 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
1.186.19 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 91.000
2003 taxes will be :
1.186.19
Short Legal HIDWAY SUB LOTS 9 AND 10
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-click?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&... 11/1 0/2003
~inellas Sounty Property App.r Information: 13 291557690000 O.
Page 3 of5
13 / 29 / 15 / 57690 / 000 / 0090
10-Noy-2003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser
Vacant Parcel Property Use: 290 Land Use: 10
16:29:58
Vacant Extra Features
Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) .00 0 0 0 0
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VA LU E: 0
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][f]~~
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=I&r=.16&s=4&t=l&u=0&...11/1 012003
~inellas <:jounty Property APp.r Information: 13 29 1557690000 O.
I -.fOJ C 22Q
0 13
1986 Lf) 0
?QeB 2030 f
~~'~8 ill HPo -' :3 CJ 13t*~ If.)
rf} lJJ 0
lJ)
I~
120(5) ~3-(J \ID liD 22(~
r'';I
Page 4 of5
TO
UJ
='
Z
LaJ
>
<C
11~,d) c:126
2001 2009
GULF" GULF
TO TO
':>.Q2~ "T ~{i)4~J,
2017 ~'8L ,;::, rn G'tJL ~
GfJd- F TO C'e1 TO
v t.D
~J) OJ I . I (::J ~x,hl ('l!~ ~
RJ
511 +
,ERCUL ES -
AVE - I
(\1
107 In
22;::'.E;
ROGERS STREET
3769~ Fi88~
en ST
""
l\J 'lq 1:\, C (c)
I~ c:. . '-.'
rr)
I
V 340. ea
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-c1ick?0=I&a=l&b=l&c=I&r=.16&s=4&t=l&u=0&...11/1 012003
Pinellas County Property App.r Infonnation: 1329 15 57690000 O.
Page 5 of5
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?0=I&a=l&b=l&c=I&r=.16&s=4&t=l&u=0&...1111 0/2003
_.--
.
. ,finellas County Property App.r Information: 13 29 15 57690000 O.
Page 2 of5
13 / 29 / 15 / 57690 / 000 / 0110
10-NoY-2003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:31:58
Ownership InforMation Non-Residential Property Add ress. Use. and Sales
ROHA SQUARE INC
516 PATRICIA AUE
DUNEDIN FL 34698-7813
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 511 S HERCULES AUE
of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Trac t : 266.01
sales frOM 2001 - 2002:
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/ IMp
Plat InforMation 6 /1.998 10.147/ 394 1.135.000 (H) I
1925: Book 013 Pgs 004- 5 /1.983 5.520/1.222 750.000 (H) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000 : Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
2003 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 316.500 HOMestead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 316.500 Tax ExeMpt %: .000
Other ExeMp t : 0
Taxable: 316.500 Agricul tural: 0
2003 Tax InforMation Land InforMation
D is t r ic t: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater View:
03 Mi llage : 23.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
03 Taxes: 7.306.43
1) 100 x 100 7.00 10.000.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2003 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
7.306.43 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 70.000
2003 taxes will be :
7.306.43
Short Legal HIDWAY SUB S 100FT OF LOTS 11 AND 12
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-c1ick?0=I&a=l&b=l&c=I&r=.16&s=4&t=l&u=0&...11/1 0/2003
...
iinellas County Property APpr.r Information: 1329 1557690000 O.
Page 3 of5
13 / 29 / 15 / 57690 / 000 / 0110 :01
10-Nov-Z003 Ji~ S~ith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:31:51
Co~~ercial Card 01 of 1 I~prove~ent Type: Offices
Proper ty Address: 511 S H ERCU L ES AU E Prop Use: 338 Land Use: 12
Structural Elements
Foundation
Floor Syste~
Exterior Wall
Height Factor
Party Wall
Structural Fra~e
Roof Fra~e
Roof Cover
Cabinet & Mill
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
Partition Factor
Continuous footing
Slab on Grade
Conc Block/Stucco
o
None
None
Gable 3: Hip
Composition Shingle
Average
Carpet Combination
Plaster furred
o
Heating & Air Heating3:Cooling Pckg
Fixtures lZ
Bath Tile
Electric
Shape Factor
Quality
Year Built
Effective Age
Other Depreciation
Function Depreciation
Econo~ic Depreciation
floor and
Ave rage
Rectangle
Ave rage
Wall
1.910
Z5
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 3.168 7) .00 0
2) Open Porch .30 960 8) .00 0
3) Open Po rch . ZO 960 9) .00 0
4) Canopy . Z5 336 10) .00 0
5) Upper Stry Base Area .90 1.182 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Commercial Extra Features
Description Di~ensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 1500Sf 1. 00 1. 500 0 1.500 999
2) fENCE zoo 6.50 ZOO 0 1. 000 1. 994
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: Z.500
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][f]~g]
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-click?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&... 11/1012003
linellas County Property APp.r Information: 13 29 1557690000 O.
lJJ 0
fY) 1996 u'J
- 2000 2030
GULF ill 0
i<P., 08 fY) r~d+f3 I Sfl~ 21 CJ
24/07 - lj) l1)
- -
IDO.I<1 120r51 .-,() 'liD i I r) 2;)(',
:> Nl- I..J
rf)
"T
..,
Page 4 of5
TO
1.&J
~
Z
La.J
>
<(
II~d3
20QI 2009
GULF" GULF"
TO TO
i8t$s v
20i"~ fY)
GUL TO OJ
TO c~ iD
W C\J
(\J
511
-JERA1tLE5
10
222 ~ E
ROGERS STREET
r---,
r- '7 ~, :::'10
o I b'0 --' R1J8
L-.: _ --.J
0) S
":r
C'L.J 2 'R
1O .. ~-'
r"
I
V 34C
~-"-:lII- ) .
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-c1ick?o=l&a=1 &b=l&c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &u=O&... 11/10/2003
Pinellas County Property App.r Information: 13 29 15 5769000000'1
Page 5 of5
Parcel Information
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
tlttp://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi -click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &u=O&... 11/10/2003
.~~
,}.
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, February
17, 2004, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue,
Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishinl!: to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetinl!:. Those cases
that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neil!:hborinl!: property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent al!:enda
and approved by a sinl!:le vote at the bel!:inninl!: of the meetinl!:.
1. Roma Square, Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in the Commercial
District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Blvd from 25 ft to 7.8 ft (to existing pavement), a
reduction to the front (west) setback along Hercules Ave from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reductions to the front
(south) setback along Rogers St from 25 ft to 1 ft (to existing building) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement),
reductions to the side (east) setback from lOft to 1 ft (to existing building) and from lOft to zero ft (to existing pavement),
a reduction to required parking from 5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft (114 spaces) to 4.4 spaces per 1,000 sq ft (100 spaces), a
deviation to locate a problematic use contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel and a deviation to locate a problematic use
within a building which does not meet all of the current land development regulations and building regulations, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.L and (2) to permit a reduction to the
landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Blvd (north) from 15 ft to 7.8 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape
buffer along Hercules Ave (west) from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along
Rogers St (south) from 10 ft to 1 ft (to existing building) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the
landscape buffer along the east property line from 5 ft to 1 ft (to existing building) and a reduction to the width of the
required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under
the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Problematic use [check cashing]) at 2001-2021 Gulf to Bay Blvd. &
511 South Hercules Ave., Midway Sub., Lots 1-12. FLD2003-10055
2. (cont from 10/21/03) Larry & Jo Ann Dean are requesting a flexible development approval to permit an office with a
reduction to the minimum lot area from 5,000 sq ft to 4,920 sq ft, a reduction to the lot width from 50 ft to 49 ft, a reduction
to the front (north) setback along Lakeview Rd from 25 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10
ft to 4 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (south) setback along Dempsey St from
25 ft to 12 ft (to building) and reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 2 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 4 ft (to
building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C and a reduction to the
north landscape buffer along Lakeview Rd from 10 ft to 4 ft, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 4 ft
and a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 2 ft, as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program, under
the provisions of Section 3-l202.G. (Proposed Use: 1,179 sq ft office) at 935 Lakeview Rd., Lake Belleview Add, Blk 1,
Lots 5 & 6 less S1. FLD2003-08036
3. Clearwater Townhomes, Inc. (Paul Camp Lane, Esquire) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a
multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601 (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock for 10 slips totaling 1,080 sq ft, with
each dock measuring 54 ft in length from the seawall, in conjunction with a 10-unit townhome development) at 161
Bril!:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub. No.2, Lots 14, 15 & 16. FLD2003-11058
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning
Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with
respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall
be granted by the Board if person requesting such demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to:
personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on
reconsideration requests.
An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be
recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to
three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount
of time up to 10 minutes.
.
.I.
.
.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by
interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department,
100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to
discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan.
This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk
Lisa Fierce
Planning Department
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REOUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND
LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REOUEST AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 02/01/04
>,~'~,lj,~u.i'li~ ii'
TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN · GULF BAY PROPERTIES e SOUTHLAND CORP
CHURCH C/O COPE, RICHARD W C/O TAX DEPT #27080
2001 RAINBOW DR 1188 MANDALA Y POINT PO BOX 711
CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 3634 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - DALLAS TX 75221 - 0711
SUB CAJUN VII INC INSURED PENSION INV 1983 NOWICKI, JANUSZ
C/O INSUR PENSION INV 1983 4934-0039 NOWICKI, ROXANA
(4934-0039) 17207 N PERIMETER DR 2297 SHARKEY RD
17207 N PERIMETER DR SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255 - 5401 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2735
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255 - 5401
YOUMANS, WILLIAM L TRE GULF TO BAY INC GULF-TO-BAY CENTER
YOUMANS, DONNA M TRE C/O CHECKERS DR-IN RESTR 1188 MANDALAY POINT
2220 SEQUOIA DR 4300 WEST CYPRESS ST STE CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767
CLEARWATERFL 33763 -1138 600
TAMPA FL 33607-
MOBIL OIL CORP LEISURE LIVING CL WR INC BEIGEL, LARRAINE
PROPERTY TAX DIVISION 412 S AURORA AVE 403 S AURORA AVE
PO BOX 4973 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3524 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3525
HOUSTON TX 77210 -
GULF-TO-BAY CENTER SHEVCHIK, MARK R GULF- TO-BAY CENTER
1188 MANDALA Y POINT SHEVCHIK, TAMARA 1188 MANDALAY POINT
CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 571 WYANDOTTE LN CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
PENN FURNACE P A 16865 -
TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN DEPRISCO, MICHAEL A
CHURCH CHURCH WALKER, DEBORAH L
2001 RAINBOW DR 2001 RAINBOW DR 2980 HAINES BAYSHORE # 149
CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 3634 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3634 CLEARWATER FL 33760 - 1524
DEPRISCO, MICHAEL A SUNKISSED APTS INC KORKIS, YACOUB
WALKER, DEBORAH L 5849 99TH TER 2625 STATE ROAD 590 # 1334
2980 HAINES BAYSHORE #149 PINELLAS PARK FL 33782 - 3226 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 2218
CLEARWATERFL 33760 - 1524
PODDI, PAUL PODDI, PAUL C NIMBUS HOLDING INC
LAZAREK, LINDA 401 S NIMBUS AVE #3 20 HAWKINS DR
3008 OVERVIEW LN CLEARWATERFL 33765- TORONTO ON M6M 2W6 00030-
SPRING HILL FL 34608 - CANADA
PINELLAS BD OF PUB INST DI BERARDINO, GIOV ANNA SHOPPES GULF BAY INC
PO BOX 2942 2061 GULF TO BA Y BLVD 908 GOLF VIEW AVE
LARGO FL 33779 - 2942 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3711 TAMPA FL 33629-
SKINZ DEEP INC
2027 GULF TO BAY BLVD
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3711
CANTERBURY OAKS INC
2025 ROGERS ST
CLEARWATERFL 33764 - 6334
CHURCH OF CHRIST
OF CLEARWATER
PO BOX 4966
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4966
KEEHNLE, W ALTER K
2043 TURNER ST N
CLEARWATERFL 33764-
. CARLISLE MOTORS · CARTER, RANDAL A
ATTN REAL EST ATE LEGAL DEPT 670 DRUID PARK DR W
110 SE 6TH ST 20TH FL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6309
FT LAUDERDALE FL 33301 - 5000
SED ENBERG, LESLIE
SEDENBERG, BARBARA L
674 DRUID PARK DR W
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6309
PETER, THOMAS J
680 CANTERBURY RD
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6327
MC MANNING, LESLIE J
MC MANNING, MARILYN
674 CANTERBURY RD
CLEARWATERFL 33764 - 6327
ITO, DAVID
1029 ELM ST
SAN CARLOS CA 94070 -
ROMA SQUARE INC
516 PATRICIA AVE
DUNEDIN FL 34698 -7813
ROMA SQUARE INC
516 PATRICIA AVE
DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7813
ROMA SQUARE INC
516 PATRICIA AVE
DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7813
ROMA SQUARE INC
516 PATRICIA AVE
DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7813
ROMA SQUARE INC
516 PATRICIA AVE
DUNEDIN FL 34698 -7813
ROMA SQUARE INC
516 PATRICIA AVE
DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7813
T L S HOLDINGS INC
28050 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE
402
CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2629
SKY CREST ASSOCIA nON
ELIZABETH FRANCE
1629 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
ROBERT PERGOLIZZI, AICP
GULF COAST CONSULTING INC
13630 58TH ST N
SUITE 110
CLEARWATER, FL 33760