FLD2002-06017
'..
.
.
, i
.~
.':
, ''<
~~
~
,~~ ..-J
Planning Department
100 South MyrUe A venue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax; 727-562-4576
CASE #: -_,f'~:' "" iP'!!i
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATlAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE ClASSIFICATION:
ZONING & lAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
.'NOR1H:
SOlJTJ-f:
WEST:
o SUBMIT ORIGINAl SIGNED NoD I-OTARIZED APPLICATON
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPl.ICA TION inciJdirg tJIded site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive InfiD Redevelopment Project (Revised 7/16101)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- use additional sheets as DeCe$Sal)'
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT IN FORMA nON: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: PAr T.~nn Dp1TPlnpmpnf- rnrpnr~f-;'nn
MAlUNGAOORESS: 730 Bonnie Brae Street, Winter Park, FL 32789
E-MAILAOORESs:tlc@paf?landdevelopment~NUMBER: (4Q7t 628-3065
CEll. ~ER:
727-447-8702
FAX NUMBER:
(407) 645-0112
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
J.J. Dan Mar Inc. Attn: Dan Gleichowski
(Must Include AlL owners)
670 Island Wa Suite 600 Clearwater FL 33767
Tom Cavanaugh, P.A.C. Land,Development Corporation
AGENT NAME(S):
MAlUNG~~: 730 Bonnie Brae Street, Winter Park, FL 32789
E-MAlLAOORESs:tlc@paclanddevelopment~NUMBER: (4071- 628-3065
CEll NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
(4.071 645....0112
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 700 N. Osceola Avenue
lEGAL. DESCRPI'1OO:
~pe Attached
(~'9i2hgjiSioo 0 ooi t20 i040 ~ the submittal)
PAR::B.. tu.tBER:
PARCEl SIZE:
1.1~UPland acres
(acres. square feet)
28 Condominium Units
(number of dwelling units, hoIeIlOOOIS or square footage of nonresidential use)
m:R)SE[) USE AID SIZE:
DESCRIPOONOFREatEST(S): Comprehensive Infill for building height exceeding
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction In required number of P3fl<1ng spaces. specific use, elc.) 50 ft.
Page 1 of 6 - Flexible ~ Application - Comprehensive InIiD Redeve\oprnent Project- City of Clearwater
It
~ v,
, \
.;.
.
.
DOES TIIS.Aff'lICATION INVOLVE TI-E TRANSFER OF DEVElOPMENT RIGHTS (IDR). A PREVIOUSlY APPROVED PlANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,
OR A PREVIOUSlY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PlAN? YES _ NO .lL (If yes, allach a copy of !he applicable
documents)
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development AppIicatioo - ComprehensIve InfiD Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
. "
J.
.
.
c "
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
i!i SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TInE INSURANCE POlICY, DEED TO THE PROPERlY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT AlTESllNG OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRmEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAl APPUCABllIlY CRITERIA:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located.
The proposed project will meet ~]] reqllirPmenT of The DownTown (D)
zoning district. It is in an area of small lots generally almost
fully covered by bUilding/parking.
2. The proposed development wiD not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significanUy
impair the value thereof.
Adiacent properties are presently developed with nmltj"'fBmily 111'le~L
The redevelopment of the site to include upscale condominiums would
im~~oy~ th~ P9mm~pity appe~rance and may even encourage redevelopmen
of neiqhborinq propert.ies. health. esicJ'~' the eighborhoodofthenrnn.-........
3. The propOsed develOpn1tlnt'will not adversely affect the or sa,ety or persons ~ IIlQ or "~-'l;f III n ...~
Th~'redevelopment of this site to an upscale condominium will not
adversely affect health or safety of neighborhood residents;
4 1he.plOPOSed. develQJ:lm~t is designed to minimize traffic congestion
A;.:lH Unlt conaOmlnl.um proJect WOUl.d generate only 1.64 daily trips,
I? dnr;ng The ~M pe~'k hnnv )5 nn~'n~ tl-t~ PM peak 1'10Ux_ This amount.
is minimal.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the cornn'lI.Illity character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The community is composed of multi-family.developments at high
densities. The prnpo1'led developmenT ;1'; ~nn1'li1'lTenT WiTh n~ns;t;es in
the NW Expansion Area of the Peripl).e.rYPlan/ and recent dev~ent a proval
6. The design of !fie propQSed development minimizes adveme effects, InCIUOing visual, aC:oustic and olfactorY and hours of impacts,
Th~arrrli1l~fnr~j"will be setback from the Shoreline of Clearwater Bay so
as to not hinder views from adjoining properties.
~ Provide complete responses to the ten (10) ~ Ifl...l REIEVB..OPM:NT PROJECTCRITERIA (as~):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use,
intensity and development standards.
The deviation from aaove 50' in height is necessary to place structu
surface parkinq is virtually impossible. The increased height will
for improved site design/landscapinq.
Page 3 of 6 a Flexible Development Application - Comprefiensive Inflll Redevelopment Projeet3 City of Clearwater
.'
.
.
,;
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential inlill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
Accordinq to PinellasCounty Propery Appraiser the assessed valu
of the existing property is $4Q7,8QO, the applicant estimates improved
value of $6 Million. This improvement is expected to improve values in the
ne1g or 00 . ..
3. The uses within the comprehensive inlill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Ciearwater. .
Condominiums (attached dwellings) are a permitted use within the
Downtown(Dl- zone in Clearwater.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive intiU redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
The underlyinq land use desiqnation is CBD per the Future Land Use PI n,
which permits 25 uhits per acre and current zoning permits attached
dwellings. Development in the area consist of older 2-story multi-fam ly
uses and recently approved proJects 1nc~Ude mu~t1-story condom1n1ums.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
~se availaPle in ~ City of Clearwater. , . . "
Land use 1n the NW Expans10n Area are d1verse. Mult1-family comprises
only 13.83% of land area in the NW Expansion Area per the plan. Suit Ie
sites for redevelopment are not readily availanle.
6. The development of the pan:eI proposed for development as a comprehensive intill redevelopment project wiD upgrade the immediate vicinity
T~,.of the..Parcel nrooosed fO{ development '7 Id tm t "'t " 11 b '1
ue eX1s.t1ng aeve~opment 1S 0 er apar en unl s or1g1na y U1 t
in 1946 - RF!deve] oprnF!lI'ln of t:hF! propF!rt-y wi't-h 'lp~~r1l p ~onnom; n; 11m!': wonl
upqrade tne immediate neiqhtborhood. increase the property value, and
appearance .
7. The design of ~' proposed comprehensive infiIl redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character
of the immediate vicinity of the parce/ proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
~hp NW Rvra~sion Area Downtown Periphary Plan encourages upsaale resi
redevelopment. The plan states "The area should be redeveloped with M
Family townhomes and condominiums. New sinqle-family is the least app
use here". The proposal is consistant with redevelopment goals and wi
8. Aexibirrty in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to comniunity character and the e
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. th e co
overa
The increase in height will allow for increased opportunities for
landscaping, amenities and improved site design. This will enhance
community character.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the invnediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 wiH be available to
avoid on-street parking in the inmediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development .
The site plan provides for adequat:e on-site parking.
ance
unity
10. The design of an buildings complies with the Tourist Disbict or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Useseparatesheetsasnecessary'The design will comply with the guidelines of the
Downt:own ni!':t-r;~t- r1nn pol;~;p~ of t-hp NW Rxprln!':;on Arprl ppr;phpry Plan.
Page 4 of 6 a Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Inrdl Redevelopment Projecta City of Clearwater
"
.
.
,.
Page 5 of 6 a Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive InfiJI Redevelopment Projecta City of Clearwater
..
,
..'~
"
x
X
x
x
X
X
X
x-
~
L
L
.
.
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202A)
}Q SIGNED N'D SEAlED SURVEY (including dimensions of property) - One original and 12 copies;
-0 CXlPY OF RECORDED PlAT, as applicable;
. Q PRElIMINARY PlAT, as required;
~ LOCATION MAPOFnE PROPERTY;
~ 1REE SlRVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' or the adjacent site, by species, size (OBH 4" or greater), and location,
incIu<f1l'lg drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
III GRADING PlAN, as applicable
F. SITE PLAN SUBMmAL REQUIREMENTS: {Section 4-202.A}
EI SITE PlAN with the foIowIng ilformation (not to exceed 24" x 36;:
X- All dimensions;
K- North arrow;
jL Engineering bar scale (mlnlmt.m scale one Inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
X Location map;
~ Index sheet referencing IndivlduaI sheets lncIuded in package;
X Footprirt and size ct all EXISTING buIdings and structues;
X- FooIprint and size ct aI PROPOSED buidlngs and structures;
X- All required setbaclcs;
X- AU existing and proposed points of access;
X- AU required sight biangles;
~ Identilication of environmentaay unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specinen
trees. incIu<fll'lg description and location of understoIy, ground COYer vegetation and wDd&fe habitats, ete;
Location. of all public and private easements;
Location of aU slreet rights-ct -way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utiilles, including lire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parldng spaces, driveways, toading areas and vehicular use areas, Including handicapped spaces;
Depletion by shacIir9 or crosshatching of aa reqtked parking lot Interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and encIosu-es (mklimum 12'x10' clear space);
Location ct allandscape material;
Location ct aD Jurisd<;lionaIines acQacent to wedands;
Location ct all onsite and oIfslte stormwater management faclIities;
location of aD outdoor Ighting ixlu'es; and
Location of all existing and proposed sldewaIks
f SITE DATA TABlE for existing, required, and proposed development, In wrlttenIIabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Xx Number of EXISTING dweIng Ids and PROPOSED dwelling uriIs;
..x Gross floor area devoted to each use;
~ Parking spaces; totaIllUIliler, preserUd In tabular form with the number of required spaces;
-X. Total paved area,lncIuding aD paved parking spaces and dllveways, expressed n square feet and percentage of the paved vehIcUar
X
iiZa
X
-X
I!Za
area;
Size and species ct aD landscape material;
0Ilicla1 records book and page nwnbers of aD existing ufiIity easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for an OOIreslde1lllal uses
}Q REDUCED SITE PlAN to scale (8 % X 11) and cdor rendering if ~
o FOO DE\R.CRAENTs o.JER aE I>aE, prov\de the foIowing additional Information on site plan:
X One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
-X Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
~
X
X
X
X-
X
,
Location of aU earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot 6005 and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural seIbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive InfiU Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
"
. .
.'
.
.
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
:e
X
-X
-X
-X
-X
-X
-X
-X
-X
.X
-X
~A
-X
Xl
'\t
o
lANDSCAPE PlAN:
All existing and proposed Structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas inducting swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of aD required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas i1cIuding landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately aOJ8cent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Location. size, desaiption, specifications and quantities of aD existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting detaits for trees, pabns, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, sciI mixes, baddilfll'l9, mulching
and protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and'or shaded and labeled and Interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet
and percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. condtions ~ by the Conm.mity Development Board);
Irrigation notes
REDUCED lANDSCAPE PlAN 10 scale (8 ~X 11) (color rendering if possible)
IRRIGATION PlAN (required for Level Two and Three app&cations)
CXJMPRI3-ENSM: ~ PROGRAM application, as applicable
H. STORMWATER PlAN SUBMmAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21)
o STORMWATER PlAN irlcIucIfll1he following reqc.iremenIs:
-X Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond an property Ines;
--X Proposed grading Including finished IIoor elevations of all structures;
--X All adjacent streets and mtri:Ipal storm systems;
....x Proposed stormwater detentioriretention area Inc:Iuding top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
4 Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quarrty;
4 Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on an plans and calculations
o COPY a= PERMIT NQUIRY LETTER 00 SOl1JHVtJEST FlOOIY\ WATER MANAGEt.ENT DIS1RICT (S'M=WMJ) PERMIT SU3MJTTAL
(SWFWM:> approval Is reqlired prior 10 Issuance of City Builcing Pennit), if applicable
o COPY a= STATE N#:) c;cu.ny STORMINATER SYSTEM TE-IN PffiMIT APPlICA1"IGIS, r ~
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PlAN SUBMmAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required i1 the event the application Includes a deveJopment where design standards are In Issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as
part of a ~ Inlil RedeveJopment Project or a ResidentiaJ InliII Prqect.
:KJ BUILDING 8..EVAllON DRAWINGS - an sides of an btiJdings IncIucing heiglt dimensions, coJors and materials
Xl REDlX::ED BI.U:lIOO B.EVATKJNS-four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 ~ X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required
J. SIGNAGE: (Section 4-202.A.16)
o Comprehensive Sign Program appfacation, as applicable (separate application and fee required)
o Reduced signage proposal (8 Y. X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application
Page 8 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive InfiD Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
"'
e
.
,'"
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
N / A 0 Indude as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive
Plan. Trip generation shaH be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to
Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement
Page 9 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive InliU Redevelopment Project-- City of Clearwater
"
L. SIGNATURE:
e
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that aU representations made in this
application are bue and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this appflCation.
2
oc~ ~ 1JtW'f.L,/r
.
rv/JANGC
STATE OF"FLORIDA, COUNTY Of.pIHEL~L.X J/fI,
Sworn to and subscribed before me this f.JL-..:- day
mAY AD. 20~ 10 me and/or
~ ~. personaRy knowQ
of
by
has
as
produced
identification:
AAL(l~ J) 6nJ-i~fiJ
NOtary public, .
My commission expires:
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
"
.
.
. "
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
Dan" Glei chowski
JJ Dan Mar. Inc.
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title hoIder(s) of the following desaibed property (address or general location):
700 North Osceola Avenue
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (desaiIe request)
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment for 28 condominium units.
3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appoi1ted and (doesIdo) appoint:
Tom Cavanaugh
P.A.C~ Land Development Corporation
as (hisItheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above desaibed property;
4. That the apprlC8lll acknowledges that aI impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, ete.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit,
certificate of occupancy. or other mechanism, whichever occurs first;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property desabed in this application;
6. ......(1Iwe~...__._aoIfy......_y ~ .4:.LL
Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINEllAS , . :l'tTH- if
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly convnissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on ~~L:2. ~ I~ d..~o .
this'- -:s \J l '{ t- 0 c) z.. '\'\ '" I l () l,.., "
, personaI1y appeared Vc>. ~ ~WGJf~ \:) ~i
Deposes and says that helshe fuDy understands the contents of the affidavit that helshe .
Page 10 of 6 - FIexilIe DeveIoprnent Application - Comprehensive InfiI RedeYeIopmert Projea- City of C1earwa
11) EcIth A SlerlIng
. . My CommIssIon 00075095
. ~llf:l~ Janu8lY 23. 2006
~ '-
W
:I:
I- :5 C>
1-1- Z
C>O<(VOW
z<(3:~..J~
30::0:: <(..J
<(1-<(i:I-:I:
....wo::lIll-
1-0-10WO::
III Oz3:0
Wo:: Z
3:W~ZIIlW
Z ::>w
1-0001Il0::wi:
::1oo::w~~
....O~OwO
o:;;<(~o~
O<(3::I:M-
,,;wwl--~
OO:I::I: _:I:o
N~I-~~W
zoowo>
~1Il1-""1Il0
W NZCD.
O:I:I-::::::><(<(
~1-::1ooO::wQ
C>O::~W~O::
I-zl- O..JO
::1wlll:;;~I-~
0:: CD W <( :I: III .
I- .C>wI-O::>-
enC>O i;:1-
~a:IIl>= Z
wzow<(w::>
C>Z..JWCD:I:O
O(5WO:: 1-0
a: Clo::
O~""Ww:I:1Il
-1 001-1-<(
w.... IO<(~J
OW-3: -1
o Z o::zW
ZI-::::i:I:<(o~
<(~:I::rwt=ll..
wOl-o-1o .
::>ll..o::zOwl-
Z 0 III en
~<(zs~:5~
<(:5 C>O:: IIll-oo
z....~oo::~-
o -1zwWW
!!?~<(<(~:I:~
~Zenl-3:l-<(
<(~1Il0 00::
:I:<(W<(WI- _
..JO:::I: :I:
1-<( I-I-enl-
O::-1:5l1loen::>
00 -I-WO
"-wwi: ..Jill
....00:: eno::O'I
oenoO....1Il0N
::EoW
W JWll..
Z~I-O::o::O::z
::::i WWOOIll
wWZ :::Ez
I-z"-O::w 3:
en- 00::1-0
w-1goo::11-
:;:1- .I-::E.... _
IIlUlIll 0'1
WwN<(l-o
:I:3:MwWoz
I- :I:W.O
....0:;;1-....~t=
Ol-W::>o-o
zl-3:g~>-t::
OWz 0<(
-W::>QNCDz
I-O::O::<(M -
01- III 0::
WIIlW I-W~
en 01-1Il1--
O::WZe:{W<(W
WC>w 3:3:CD
1-0:I:z o::~
~a:I--IIl<(1-
o ~www
~-1cie:{I--1W
I-WW ::>00::
>-wZ I-
....wO:E....1Il
I-O>z 0
<(wzwoo::~
WzO::EMWo
o-o~ 1--
z-1 01ll<(0::
(;:l W:I:~u::13:3
U ::EI-w.o:: W
0: ::Eo:o::>-ClW
<( OOW<(W:I:lJ..
11.. UZ:I:lDOI-O
.
I-
en
e:{
W
-(;:ll- ~
~ZIllW
-zWc>
Z<(3:z
Z:I:
CiUIIl<(
W wO::
mWI- -
:I:::>:I:
lJ..l-zl-
0lJ..:E6
1-0NIIl
~WIOO'I
~QIIlN
IIlWll..
<(I-~Z
0::1IlC>1Il
o<(WZ
....wo:;:
:;,>-W~~
We:{:I:
;::ml-i:ai
ZO::C>::>z
~~~gQ
e:{..J I-
w3:<(~~
::>O::WZIll
Z<(enw
wWO:::I: -
>..J::>I-<(
<(UO Q
<(,,-0~:5
..J0>-~-1
~1IC~::E""
00: .
Ule:{~O::~
O::EI-~z
....0:::5<(6
o~z:;:U
W<(<(:I:1Il
~3: ~<(
..J:I:~:I:j
I-C>www
~z~~~
3:wwo:ll..
c>:I: W -
W<(I->f5ui
:I:o: .<(I-en
I-w>- <(w
o~~~3:J
z 1-0:0:
<(wo:: <(0
:I:wOW
~I-I-I-d~
ZO<(I- 0
WI-3:wz",
> o::w-""
<(1-<(lJ..c>en
WW zw
Ww..Jo-o:
C>....oowo
Q zom<(
o:o-vo_
3~..J=Zoi .
wUlWI- <( ~
....~~enC>~o
o <(<(Z_O
w:cw):i1:W
w::>o ..J<(O:
ZZ W h
-wwuozi....
..J>:I:ZZOO
:ce:{I-~<(~Cn
I-wol- .01-
O::C>I- C>..JZ
00 :i"~""W
za:I-I-~....~
WOWO::-Olll
:c..JWOC> <(
I-w....z~~w
....lJ..OW <(..J
00~3~1-;1
zwo en
OZO'IO'II- .0
t=::::iQ~~~z
~O:I:I-~~..J<(
NWI-IIl- -1>-
1Il000w OWz
0::0::0:;:lJ..1-~<(
wWz 0 11..
m~ Zwl- 0
::E_W::>OW....I-
N::> :I:o::zWO
..J Z ~I- w<(lJ.. >-1-
wI- ClOI-OI-O
U O::EZZ!!:!oZ~
~ ~~3~0";6~
11.. 1-....<(I-<(~UlJ)
....
o
I-
:I:
C>
a:
J
<(
Z
<(
U
I-
o
a:
I-
Ul
o
Z
o
t=
<(
C>
:;:
e:{
Z
_ 0
Z
<(
..J
~..:
1-0
III I-
<(0:
0<(
011..
1-1-
Ul<(
W:c
3:1-
J
<(
::>
o
~
o
S.
I-
Z
w
::E
W
en
<(
W
>-
<(
:;:
~~<i
WZIIlQ
C>z<(o::
o<(wo
-:c -1
o:uw....
o U
~~za::
J-ww
.... :I:I-
Ool-e:{
wl-:i"~
~I-I-<(
..JwO::w
:cw~..J
1-.... 0
:50~~
Z~oC>
C>~I-~
zoww
o-wm
..J .....
<(:;'O'I~
I-WO<(
cn3:oc>
~w~~
U >-
zz......J
::>WO _
O:::I:wC>
.1- 0 ~
wzzz
>::><(~
<(0:1-c>
enw
<(ciom
5~<(lJ..
WZ 0
U~-1
cnC>wl-
oWzz
mz-
<(0
lJ..lJ..:cll..
oouw
wl-....:c
~ZOI-
..J- _
-~w~~
3: 0 -
WU;I-O:
O:I: wO
ZI-I-w~
e:{ en....
0:: <( .
JOWO>-
>lJ.. 01-
W .z
<(>-:c~::>
<(1-_0
~mc> :U
QO::Z3:1Il
o::wONe:{
3~;1JQj
W3:wu;~
....~cnwii:
Ow~U .
wdo~1-
~ U:I:~
..J~>-I-w
. ..J.
ZO:o::lIClI')
wwo:-
WI-:I:<(w
1-:I:e:{I-:::ECl
3:0:: Z
00::<(
....:czwo:
Oc> I-
zze:{<(:i"
o z3:1-
t=~-:c::>
Ue:{WClg
WO::Uz
cnwz 0'1
O:>WWN
W<(:CCl
~ I-<(~
_o.o:::c
I->-Wcn
Z e:{>Z
<(1-03<(3:
::E::10::0~
0.... WI-
0: I-
....0<(1-0'1
.03:Wz
~uio::Wo
NN<(....-
I-r<l~ot;
U :uOw
~~lJ..OIll
I-<(O~~
.
W
~
..J
0:
W
I-
Z
W
U
:I:
U
i:
3:'
~
en
<(
W
~
-1
<(
Z
<(
U
>-
<(
:;:
0::
W
I-
<(
3:
. Z
~ Q ~
::>WI- Z
j~~Q~
<(1Il<(
~0:::511l:i"
I- ::il- lJ.. ~
e:{1-~00
~6w~1Il
e:{1Ili:'?0'I
W ll..N
..JO'I
ONOOll..
I-z-
....~ <(~
O:I:>- Z
IIle:{Ul:;:
O::Z:;:r<lo
~3:0::n.1-
ow
ZI-I-I- .
W e:{ 0'1
uui3:Gz
w- 0
:czO....-
1-0~01-
ot=lIlz~
zo....oen
e:{~ot=....
..J 1000
e:{.... W
oMeno:
Z o..O::w
e:{o:: Wz
OWI-I-o:
>-Z::>~O
e:{O::U 0
3:8....~1-
0: 01-1Il
WI- <(
I-lIlwow
<(e:{ZI-:I:
3:w::::i I-
:I:o:Ul::>
..JI-WMO
~:5~o..en
lJ)ZWI-~
~wu::>1-
o:I:wO
<(I-:I:....~
~....I-o
zOC>wl-
-I-~~~
I-IIlJJ3:
IIlw<(O::
e:{3: WI-
o I-I-w
Ol-WZW
www....
:;,w....uoo
w....=C>~
3:0 NOZ",:
--;0 Ul
wmo<(Joo
:I:.,.- N
I-j;; :1-0
....ol'-'wz
OZV~<(
W<(!'> -
Z .NCl):C
-:I:JQMI-
..JI-N"':O::
O::::>z!2o
Wo NZ
I-enw
Z 0:1-
Wol-Z~W
wWo,W
wW:I:v....
:c....l-o,v
1-0'I~~1i'!
....":<(00'1
ovQz~
No: M
ZIOOWN
o -1U
t=C>....ZC>
O~ W~
W~>-"i:~
en~1-
:5I-Suil-
I-~OM~
~~Oo..~
~Q~~Q
I-<(..J<(<(
enJ lJ)
I-~WIO~
e:{ .~ M .
Wll..'>-
C>Cl ll..e:{
~Q~I-3:
ZlrlJ)::>O:
Z <(UW
Ci>-w I-
We:{ ....e:{
m3:~o3:
J
e:{
I-
en
e:{
o
o
<(
0::
I-
~
I-
en
e:{
o
o
I-
en
W
3:
W
:I:
I-
....
o
W
~
J
0::
W
I-
Z
W
U
W
:I:
I-
....
o
I-
en
W
3:
o
Z
<(
I-
III
<(
W
W
Q
en
o::t:
W:;:
:c
1-0
WI-
I-cn
W:;:
Wo
......J
OJ
00
.lJ..
o
10 III
Ne:{
ZO
z~
1--
~5
III
Clw
Zo
S!!:!
...~_....... -._.0
. <~
.-- t....... ':,,:,.~- .' .
. ...;-:-.:~:..~.!t..:.
r
.- )
'~
.
This Warranty Deed
.
~ """-.7_._
,..cz...OS.. Pi ~
AD. 19 " ....
.,
'I" Ibis 14th ..., III Jfay
t.y
aeozg. ~. . ~e4-.n
r
IlCfciUru aIIcd die paaIQr.1D
tI. J. DaDIar, Isle., . nori4a COzporatJ.
QJ
-so
Q,tcs.1O
-
u.as.
u.....
....
--.... GI&te ~ iI: J3,. ...ten DE'.
C1euvat:er. rr. 13"1
~ ClIIbIIk IfIIIICe:
. .-....... - -.., --.- -.--..-..., ........--......
. SO --191 "f'V"-"'" --.,....--..... ok _.......~......-.
:sa.~" ...Ik...........___..rrldlc_.$ 10.00
"'1IIfag~~..-. ....~~. ~ .....,.......I>rarpils. ds....1ftDita.
--. ...... ........11IIo... paoMe. .... -- .... ...... .. '!lleu..
C"C*I1. FJariI&. .v:
he 8c:IIeda1e . attubed Jaereto NI4 J;,y thU At---=- -.de . pa:t
~.
TO C'oweDaau, ~~tJ.~. ...rulta of ~ ad ~ ~<<
~ }feU.
Sd4 Pl'Or-t." U DOt t:be ~ ~ tbe ~(., 1IIIlIK tile ~
ea4 GOII8U~ of tile State of. ftorida iD tllat _lu..r Gna~(aJ <<
UtI v-"1en of tile 1Ioa8eIIo14 of Gna~(.J nai4a ~...
Ji
. .
~
v-.
.-,..
l'Ucel UeIlUfU.UGa....... "'2t/U/OOOOO'420'H"
T..............----.-..-........--zsdlado~....MJ'Iioc. .. ~
... .... ... ........ tIIc _ .. rcc ...... ~.
AM -...........,-....... p..-..... _ ..... io....., ICiIcIrrl........ ill fee ~
.... tIIc .- .. ......., ... ........., ... d ... ~... W; .... doc ,,- ......, r.a,-
lIIc lidc Ia..... ... ... ,. ..,... tIIc _ ..... doc ..... c:J..i.a vi. ~ .. .... ... ..... ..... .... io
he.".. ~~ ClIIIlqIC..... --. ~ Ie o.:.....hcr 31. " "
.. wa.- ~ dIe.....-........... ICaIcd IIac ..- IIIc ., ... ~ &sa ........
1niao:a.
~ <<tIIt!d tINl tldirItt:tetlln our pRmJa:
-~~
;00 B. o.ceo1.a Avie. '7
C1~ n. 337S5
--
'-'IC4Q
fi5I
fi5I
........ .......
rw
-
'-.~
-
fU1
-..-.-
5c.re ", Florida
c-, '" 1'1-11..
ncr..cp;.,-"'-"_~l . 'v"""-" 1ftla .",'" _
.., .
~.....,.~-
. J9" .
no io pcnaMIIy ~... -.................. c!n.'YU". 1ic:aH
.
. ......;r~:...
~1).1
S/'1J
I
f'aU4ItD 11\': ............
RECoaJ allEnJaN TO:
c.c..,............. IDe.
JU ........... N.r6
~,"""'D7IIJ
~'
( t.~~4c ~
~ .
-'-
H-", If'r':S,:T
. ...
....;~
,
1.
i
_A
flIr NId6,M7
::~: ....r?};~_.....
..;,(~1':- ~~~__
1
li
f
~
l
;
.
t
.
f
L
Description: Pine~~as,FL Document-Book.Page 10519.2451 Page: 1 of 2
Order: gerry Comment:
.. .0._.. ....~:;.o:;~-'y.;...~.:".
. .- .:,-,~,,;,~:,: ~~~~\;;'iT/;~:;~:~~,i~1~i:;:.:r~j)~:::~~' ~f~f;:lmi~ '; ~I'
... ......:'\0..-
'.
.
.
tot.
r
or:~~..._
. .IK .~" ..;.......
. q.~
1dIeda1. "
Cc flloe at tU iratenectioJa of tile "'t llu of Fort IIuzUoa
"YBH ad al4rUge 8tnet .... nD 253 f_t ~ aloa9 Irorth
liM oC Bldridp Street to Ir68t 1JJIe of Osceola ".... Cor a
pout of ~~illlJ, hUg tile Soatheut COZlIU oC tile ~
~ COII.")~. !2Iace. nil ...t 32tt C..t lIOn or 1... a1clag
.~ 1irae of B1CIdcIge SUMt to tile _t.r of CJ..eazwater Bay.
ClIIIlIIfllt'e .... at ..u 80latIaeut COZDer of W. tract aa4 nD
lfortIl15- ze.t 75:.1/2 feet, tMIIce, rma Jronh n-30. w..R 320
fMtIllln or leu to tU _~ of C1....~ aq, tIIeace nD
~ 13- w..t a1Gag tIae _ten of eean.eu Bay 10 feet.ore
or 1tH to t:Jae iatenacUoa ntla tM fint 1... abcwe defiraecl
(tile IIortIa 1iDe of 81dri4ge Itnet) belDg iA hctioa ,. ~
2' IcnatIa. ..... 15 "'t, ~acU.aw aU iAtenR 1Ie14.,. ..B.
~ ~ dM4 fRa U. 1AteaaJ, ~...I nt fua4 "'c:ribe4
.. to11OIf8.
'ftICr ...... Z7. hca IIIl iataalecUoa of tile JrortIa u- of
B14d4ge A.... ad tU West Uae of O'~Ia...... ~ IreR
alGIf tile Iroct:Il 1iN of a4ddge. A..... S2f hft to tile aYenge
b1P water MZ'k of C'1uzwa~ aar foe a pout of ~.
ftace, na...t 1, OJO fMt to tile -.... iA eJeariIa~ Ifey,
t:IIeIIee Sa a Jron:2aIir1r coune a1clag tM Jrut .u. of tIae ---.1
a 4bt~ of ut." dae -.ua, ~ Jrut 1,1" feet: to tile
.~ .hip water ~ t:IIeaee Ioatla 17-52- ...e: IfS feet to
poiIIt of~. eo.hofftftW 4.1 ae&'U ... or 1.... aa4
lyj8f aa4 ~ iD Cleuwatu, ~-,~.. CloaDtr, n.tda. ira
ro.uIdp 2t ~ aa-.. 15 But. CbaDtr of ,,_u... State of
r1od4a.
I'UiI 10. 35.407
t
~
L,~~,!!,l'\~"- '. ',..,'"J.....
t~~~~t~;- ~;;::.' ,,' " . : ii~,'i;j.;~~;:;"i~~:~*~~:~f ~~{~~~tjJft~:.~:. ';;
Description: Pine~~as,FL Document-Book.Page ~05~9.245~ Page:. 2 or 2
Order: gerry Comment:
1
~. ~... L
.," .
i :
"
"
.
.
APR. 2.8002
5:52PM
NO. 929
P.2/3
\1
'"'!
c-
o
cj
IV.
rl
.
. ." - .::..I.":">.'.~" - '. .... .'.
'll'''~''"~ ...:.:' '., . ",' ....) . .J"... '.I..,.' .;" : :"'tJ1~ ' ,I. ,1 '" ..
. .. 'J . \ "'C' ,'. ~ . " ,.. . . , . 'Y'~ .' ~ ~':Yo iriiI .
:~.....' .. .,,'. '.~' ':~""'. . 1...,. .."V,.. I~ ~ '1'<:'.' I,i"~. '.~". .
. I. . ~:.., (t. :V~ '.".' {.,-.. .' .... "1"': ',' ..'... ..
. "'."'. ""......1~ ",jf!iO~'" ,1' .,.,.;........ .,....
...~~.l:(;:. ..... I~'" -:~ . ~.,~~. ~:oI<'" ',:~ .' ~~tA.ft~. ;f~.\.:.J)~~ ,..,:
.. 1. . ... ....... .....~.. ,.' ,'. )11">". t ...'tr. ..... 7!" ~ _:'!"" ,..~ .
J)~I~jO.. ~.~~~;\.} -. . . : ';.' :.:: ~:.<~. . . . .. '.. -'.:' .' .
~:,,'i.;~ : .'T' ..~~~:..."',..*' . ....~r .;"~"~~ ('I",~'< J..:...~N.\~. JA.~h"'~..; \lil\1lll-' .
." . . '. i:MiI/!.i1:..~~_.,.~~W.,:.~. :. . ':.. .'.?-< ~'.J..".!.....~.::...~~~~~.~;. "
..~~ "... .t._~, !,I:'~~~~l ";"
~he t'rU,... ot...t&;' :tA.'.Jiisal.Q-Pi'~' . .' >~b4 '0": ~".,~~~\j'd~':: ~
nor14a. ~.I":r.ucf ~i'Y.1r.u.ot ',t. ...;ftb~r1't1 pt -.o'Uon 10"&1 .
of' .~. Rt"ta.4 cJf"'~~ ;."u... ot\.i1iiitia;" ant .J~~r41nj "0 the
~ro"1.1~a. and pr&oe4ure 'pray1'ed rO~'l~'~..'loa 10'. ot 'he
It.d.ed General "&tut.. ot noai4a. .a4 t~r aM 18 ooul'.rUloA
o~ 'he .uN of Pour Hundr'd rea aat 00/100 lollarl ("10.00) '0
. .
_b.. la but ~4 b)' . .Z. KlpIl1 of Pi.un.. Owai,. no.s......
. ,...
rtoelp~ ot Wbloh 11 hereb1 &.taowll~d. ha..<<raa'e4. barl&lnt4.
1014 &~ OOft.e,eo. to the la1~ 1.1. Xilhel1 &ad hi. heIr. aa4
&.lI1rDI, torever, tho.e oerta.... I1llMDer<<ed llLll41, de.Odbe4 a.
to 1.1 a.. , o-..U I
f~f ." From an In'er..a'loD ot lorth I1n. ot Eldr14<<'
I.,DU' and -eat 11ne ot O..tola A"lau., ~n We.' .1oftC
101'.b 11ne of 1141"1481 Annul 126 t.., Cou.r&6' hip
w"ll'la Olearwat.r 8&, '0 poin' ot be<<~nn1aa,
rh.ao. We.t 10~O te.t t~ Ihanael 1n Cllarwa'.r Ba,.
Thlnae In a lorth.rl1 oour.. aloA<< la~' ~14e ot ohann.l
a d1.taDo. of 160.09 fe.' 4u. lor'h,
Th'no. I." 1140 teet to .Y'ra~. h1~h .."r-~&rt,
TheDO' 30uth 17 d'~r6" 62' w.., 14a feet to ~olnt of
be~1nnlll<<,
CODta1nln~ ~.l aor'H, Mor. or le.8, and 111~~ and be11~
in Clearwater, '10r1da. 1n TOWD"hlp 29 3outh. ftu~. 10
Ealt. County or Pin.lIae, !'8t~ ot '10r14a.
TO HAVF. AND TO ROLD the "1.\14 ab~v.e lI.nUoo.e an(. UUOTl bl;d
l..nl1 unc. t:r.r:-.1".... and 1111 the Hel. 8n( lntere-,', of the Tru"te..
therein .~ ~ranteQ ~o 'hem bT ~e:tion 1061 ot tho ~evi".4 Gen.ral
9'a~ut." ot ~lorlda. un'to ~h. Maid N.E. l1<<hell and hiH he1r. ~n4
I
I'
,.
I
!
a".l~nl torever.
"~:'DJ):~bl'B(r_fo' ~h.'lftm..:llr' )'~...la" rnal
~".taP"'o'."'.'1i .PU.A4';ot.rlo..1.... 04 tlMi.. IruI!o..'Orlt,"U'u8d1vlU4
~."!'r..'" 1 :~:'.",'
-';IaI't.-tOUI"~h. la~.rt ,& 1a &114 HU. in aM to g' 'An4~v14e4,. 'hree-
. ... ':"'" .~.-..":
tourthl hhrut in all tbe phUphilh. 1Il1nerab aDd Inetal,- &ha'
(l'
f.
. .
,
'1
.1., ,
:' . '< .;."
'. "1
. i.l. ~ I
-1-
....
~ , :' AfR; 2.20e2 5: 53PM
l
.
.
NO. 929
P.3/3
.'
"DB 40 I ! 4-4-'
.', 'W Wl4e,. U.. 8a14 aboTe dUor! 'be" leul4. t
... '";
1':. .:',,JlalI Sa....... ill 'Ud HU. in and to an
r,_ . .
.' ':.ht.J'..' 1D all 'Ile p, til'ole-.n 'ba' 18 or
. -'J'"
~;.h. 8a14 abov, 4e801'1b'4 land, with the
~- . .
.... .
Truste.. ot the
f" ., ..
Fund of the State ot
nOl'lcla nay., bereunto !Nbllcrlb~G thelr nail...
and. attlxe4 Lbel,. "lI.l~. uad h&.ve OQU'led. the
. .
, i
i
I
,: Ileal 0 t TKE D.c:PAR'lIfJ::RT OF .\GRICU.:... {Pi:: 0:' !'!1..;
. !
StATE or FLORIDA, '0 :Ie lioreunto arfixe", , .. t
Chtl CI.&P1tol. 1n. ,.. C1t,/ or fhll hu:tlfeo:, on
tbl.. the' 'h 4bY ot JE.nuary :..D. 1920.
6J~ }Yh1/~(S=1
eJ'nol'. I
(lEAL)
(lEAL)
IS:'.ALI
). ~. . - '- (,l;ALI
1?o~ri~~lnn.' 1[' A~rl'~u ture~---
nLII)f.Ee.!.t!!!..B.I..~:.-?!.O'OLOOJC . fA'.;' W
AID IIOOImID IW !II1JOOl ROnc 480n.
I. I. O'~, Olark 01rc\Ut Court.
P1DeUaI Oomrty. nor14e
. ,
,
,.
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS
Af :~~;, :~ S
",\" '.,'
.
August 19,2002
Mr. MarkT. Parry, Planner
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Re: Bayview Condominium - 700.North Osceola Avenue
Application for Flexible Development
Case Number FLD-2002-060l7
Dear Mr. Parry:
We are enclosing fifteen full size (24 inch by 36 inch) copiesofthe following:
a) Preliminary Site Plan
b) Landscaping and Irrigation Plans
c) Building Floor plans, including the Parking Garage Floor Plans (entry level 1 and garage
level 2)
d) Boundary, Topographic, and Tree Survey
e) Colored Building Elevations
One reduced copy (8-1/2 inch by!l inch) of each.ofthe following is also enclosed:
a) Preliminary Site Plans
b) Landscaping and Irrigation Plans (Black and white and a colored rendering)
c) Colored renderings of the building elevations.
We are also in receipt of the official DRC comments via your e-mail dated August 16, 2002. Our
responses to the DRC comments are given below in the same order that they were originally presented.
Comment:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a. Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees due prior to
issuance of building permits for 21 additional units. (Residential expansion from 7
apartments to 28 condominium units crediting the existing 7 units) Contact Deb
Richter at 562-4817.
2639 McCORMICK DRIVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759
Tel: (727) 724-8422 · Fax: (727) 724-8606
<~
.. '-,
~ ,
Mr. Mark Parry
August 19, 2002
Page 2
Response:
Comment:
.
.
We understand the impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits and will
coordinate with Debbie Richter.
2. Traffic Engineering:
a. Should not remove existing parking from the south side of Eldridge Street.
Response:
Comment:
At the DRC meeting, Mr. Paul Bertels agreed that the removal of one space as
recommended by the Fire Marshall will be acceptable.
b. Clarify function of handicap space on north side of Eldridge Street (where is ramp,
sign, etc.?);
Response:
Comment:
The construction details have been added to the preliminary site plan.
c. Clarify function of area at west end of Eldridge Street on north side (one plan
identifies this area as parking another does not).
Response:
There are two parking spaces on the north side of Eldridge Street. One space is a
handicapped space and the other is a regular space. The regular space has been
designated as "Temporary Parking" with a 15 minute limit. Appropriate signage has
been added to the plans.
The area west of the regular space is the main building entrance and a loading drop-off
area. The plans have been clarified.
.'
.;., ~._,
.' .~
.
.
Mr. Mark Parry
August 19, 2002
Page 3
Comment:
Response:
Comment:
Response:
Comment:
Response:
Comment:
Response:
Comment:
d. Will there be a gate?
Gates will be provided as shown on the plans. The Level 2 gate will be a sliding gate,
while the Levell gate will be a "roll-up" gate. Remote control openers will be provided.
e. Clarify function of "Compactor Space" in "Guest Parking" area.
Guest parking is on the south side of the driveway in parking level 2 off Osceola Avenue.
The dumpster staging area is a. concrete pad north of this driveway, which connects the
trash room with Osceola Avenue.
f. Need a note on the site plan about how the parking and ramp work.
There is no internal ramp connecting parking levels land 2. The grade differential
between Osceola Avenue and Eldridge Street allows two separate entrances. A note has
been added to the plans to clarify this operation.
g. "Guest Parking" appears to include a regular parking space inside gated area.
Applicant will modify site plan to correct - shift location of arrow.
The plans have been revised to properly indicate the location of the four (4) guest parking
spaces on Level 2.
h. Guest parking not shown on page four of five on site plans.
..
.
.<
~. ~.
Mr. Mark Parry
August 19, 2002
Page 4
Response:
Comment:
.
.
The site plan has been revised to show appropriate features of both parking levels The
guest parking spaces on level 2 have been shown on the site plan.
i. Sight triangle omitted from west side of south garage entrance.
Response:
Comment:
The plans have been revised to show the sight triangle. A proposed stop sign and other
informational signs, which will require vehicles to stop and watch for pedestrians, have
also been added to the building column nearest the driveway.
j. How does elevation affect sight distance when exiting south garage entrance?
Response:
Comment:
Vehicles will be required to stop before entering Eldridge Street. At this vehicle location
there will be appropriate sight distance to observe on-coming traffic.
k. Show handicap ramp/access to elevator on Levell of parking garage;
Response:
Comment:
Response:
The access path to the elevator on Level 1 is shown on the preliminary architectural
plans. A ramp is not necessary because there is no change in grade.
l. Items a - k to be addressed prior to review by CDB;
Okay.
.'
..;, 'd
.,-,
Mr. Mark Parry
August 19,2002
Page 5
Comment:
.
.
m. Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
Response:
Comment:
Okay. At the DRC meeting Corey Martens agreed to email or fax the necessary
information directly to the applicant.
n. Is there to be shared parking with site across the street (removing one on street
space and add to this site for the attached dwellings to the south)? Is there an
agreement with the adjacent property owner?;
Response:
Comment:
There is no shared parking proposed. The 8-unit townhome project to the south has 8
off-street parking spaces and all but 1 of the existing on-street parking spaces will
remaIn.
o. Clarify gate operation and space requirements for equipment, and vehicle stacking
during activation prior to issuance of any permits. The applicant may eliminate the
pedestal card swipe device and replace with remote control devices.
Response:
Comment:
The building column at the Osceola A venue entrance has been removed. The gate on the
Level 2 entrance will be a sliding gate, while the Level 1 gate will be a "roll up" gate.
Gate details and operation will be provided on the final construction plans prior to
issuance of any permits.
3. General Engineering:
Response:
a. Label gas main on Osceola Avenue. Note #19 says location not shown then what is
the dashed line shown?
The gas main has been labeled on the plan.
. ,
<.'
'. ~-<
Mr. Mark Parry
Augu,st 19,2002
Page 6
Comment:
.
.
b. Show A.D.A. ramps for proposed sidewalk Eldridge Street at drive apron for
parking garage.
Response:
Comment:
The handicapped ramps have been shown on the plans.
c. Show curbside location (staging area) for roll offs (Note #10,Sheet 4 of 5)
Response:
Comment:
The concrete staging area between the trash room and Osceola Avenue has been shown
on the plan.
d. Need grades for access drive to trash room;
Response:
Comment:
The grades for at the entrance to the trash room have been shown.
e. Three-point turn doesn't meet the City's Engineering Department Standards and
Specifications (on Eldridge Street).
Response:
Comment:
Response:
At the DRC meeting it was agreed that the three-point-turn was acceptable since there
was no objection from the fire and solid waste departments.
f. With regards to the drive located on Eldridge Street: Two columns shown in a view
triangle on west side. See item 2 i above for clarification.
The plans have been revised to show the sight triangle. A proposed stop sign and other
informational signs, which will require vehicles to stop and watch for pedestrians, have
also been added to the building column nearest the driveway.
~ ,
. ,
.
.
"'. ,-.
Mr. Mark Parry
August 19, 2002
Page 7
Comment:
g. What are the shaded areas shown on Sheet 4 of 5 and why does one cross over the
sidewalk.
Response:
The plans have been revised to show that the shaded areas are interior landscaped areas.
The small portion of the shading over the sidewalk has been removed.
Comment:
h. Landscape Plan (Sheet LA-I): Loading and drop off area is shown fully landscaped
Response:
The landscape plan has been revised to eliminate landscaping from the . area north of the
loading zone. The area has been shown as paving blocks to provide a hard surface as
required by the fire department.
Comment:
i. All easements required will be due prior to C.O. (Applicant responsible for drawing
and legal descriptions)
Response:
The project will be platted as a condominium. If any easements are required they will be
shown on the condominium plat.
Comment:
j. Clarify the above (3 a - h) prior to review by CDB.
Response:
Okay.
Comment:
4. Stormwater:
a. General note on drainage sheet: Clarify into which inlet yard drains will tie prior to
review by CDB. (Note #18)
< ,
. ,
"'- "'--<
Mr. Mark Parry
August 19,2002
Page 8
.
.
Response:
The plan has been revised to show that the trench drain at the entrance off Eldridge Street
will be connected to the building sewer and will discharge into the proposed stormwater
treatment vault. We do not anticipate that any yard drains will be required.
Comment:
5. Environmental:
a. The swimming pool encroaches within the 25-foot setback from wetlands on the
south side. This encroachment can probably be accommodated if the developer
provides an exotic, nuisance vegetation control and maintenance plan for the
balance of the wetland area, which is highly impacted. The upland and vegetated
wetland areas have accreted as a result of a quiescent area created on the inside
corner of two seawalls;
Response:
The existing wetlands are disturbed. Exotic species and nuisance vegetation will be
removed and replaced with natural wetland plants acceptable to the City and SWFWMD.
Trash and accumulated debris will also be removed.
Comment:
b. The SWFWMD requires that the developer provide treatment for the difference
between pre- and post-development to OFW requirements (3/4 inch); however will
allow that treatment to occur in a vault as proposed;
Response:
Okay.
Comment:
c. City does not allow vaults for stormwater treatment. Much of the stormwater that is
proposed to be treated is from roof runoff; the balance being from driveway and
several parking spaces. However, the two parking levels will be washed down
periodically and that water will enter floor drains and subsequently the storm
system. As a compromise I suggested that he consider routing the roof drains
through the proposed vault which will apparently have a fIltration system and easy
access and treat the vehicular areas in an open system or in a system that
incorporates replaceable fIlters that remove sediment, oils, greases as well as
associated metals. Barry indicated that if we could agree to allow the roof drains to
be treated through the vault that he would propose an alternate system for the
vehicular areas including the two parking levels. Stormwater vaults are not typically
.,'
to, '>-,
, <
.
.
Mr. Mark Parry
August 19,2002
Page 9
Response:
Comment:
Response:
Comment:
acceptable for water quality treatment; need solution for vehicular use area to get
out suspended solids, oil and grease, etc.; applicant was asked to f'md another way to
design without a vault;
Roof drains and surface water from the site will be directed in a "standard" stormwater
vault. Floor drains from the two parking levels will be directed into a commercial
oil/water separator. The plans have not been revised since the preliminary plans already
show the garage levels connected to a proposed commercial oil/water separator.
d. All of the above (5 a -c) to be addressed as to the satisfaction of staff; prior to the
issuance of any permits.
Okay.
6. Planning:
Response:
Comment:
Response:
a. Clarify what portions of submerged land is owned by the applicant prior to the
CDB review.
A copy of the TIIF deed has previously been submitted to the DRC. The applicant owns
the submerged land westward to the channel (Intercoastal Waterway) in Clearwater
Harbor. No construction or other work is proposed on the submerged lands. A copy of
the Deed recorded in January 1926 in Deed Book 401 on Page 446 is attached.
b. It is still not clear how to measure the height of the building - to the midpoint of the
peak of the primary roof or, if the roof is generally flat, to that flat roof; applicant
submitted three different ways to calculate height;
The visible portion of the roof is peaked. There are portions of the roof not visible from
below that are flat to accommodate the heating and cooling equipment of the building.
The height is calculated from the average elevation of the site or from the flood elevation
to the mid-point of the peaked roof as allowed by the City code. Using these two
methods, the building height is calculated as shown below:
--}
.
.
. -\_<
Mr. Mark Parry
August 19,2002
Page 10
a. Midpoint on Sloping Roof to the Flood Elevation
94.92 feet (midpoint of root) - 12.0 feet (flood elevation) = 82.92 feet.
b. Midpoint on Roof to the Mean Elevation of the Existing Grade
Mean elevation of existing grade =
27 feet (Osceola Avenue) + 0.0 feet (Clearwater Harbor) = 13.5 feet
2
94.92 feet (midpoint of roof) - 13.5 feet (elevation of first floor) = 81.42 feet
Both of these building heights are shown on the cover sheet. We leave it to the
DRC to interpret City codes to select the appropriate building height.
Comment:
c. A TIIF is depicted on the zoning atlas. Staff received a faxed copy this week; please
explain what this means;
Response:
The Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund (TIIF) deeded submerged lands to certain
property owners. This ownership is shown on the boundary survey. A copy ofthe TIIF
Deed recorded in January 1926 in Deed Book 401 on Page 446 is attached.
Comment:
d. It is not clear how density was calculated. It appears as though the acreage was
inadvertently rounded "up". Staff calculations still indicate a density limit of 27
units. Clarify what area was used to calculate density prior to the review by the
CDB.
Response:
The updated boundary survey of the site indicates that the total area of the site landward
of the mean high water line is 1.12 acres. This upland area has been used in the density
calculations.
Comment:
e. Indicate the number of existing parking spaces.
Response:
The number of existing parking spaces has been shown on the cover sheet.
,,- ~ <
Mr.Mark Parry
August 19,2002
Page 11
.
.
.<
Comment:
7. Solid waste
a. Signify dumpster staging area prior to CDB review. To where will the dumpsters be
pulled? (See comment 3.c. above.
Response:
The concrete staging area between the building and Osceola Avenue has been labeled on
the plans. The dumpster will be moved to a curbside location approved by the City.
Comment:
8. Land resource
a. Remove Hickory north of the building in the drainage swale. Too much impact for
this tree to survive
Response:
No plan revision is required since the landscape plan already showed this tree to be
removed.
Comment:
a. Revise with the above comment prior to CDB review.
Response:
No plan revisions is required since the landscape plan already showed this tree to be
removed.
Comment:
9. Fire:
a. Provide a complete High Rise package, including but not limited to, Fire Pump,
Generator, Standpipe System, Sprinkler System, Fire Alarm System, Fire Control
Room, Fireman's Phone System w/Jacks, Stairwell smoke removal system. Provide
prior to the issuance of any permits.
~, ... 'f
Mr. MarkParry
August 19,2002
Page 12
.
.
Response:
The building will be equipped with a fire sprinkler system. However, prior to applying
for a building permit, the applicant will provide documentation to the City that certain
specific requirements for buildings over 75 feet high do not apply to this proposed
building.
Comment:
b. Gates require an approved Emergency Entry System as per Pinellas County
Ordinance 98-4. Show on Construction plans prior to the issuance of any permits;
Response:
OK, the emergency entry system will be shown on the plans prior to issuance of the
building permit as required.
Comment:
c. Provide a Knox Key Box on building for emergency egress, as per NFP A 1. Show on
Construction Plans prior to the issuance of any permits.
Response:
OK, the Knox Key Box will be shown on the plans prior to issuance of the building
permit as required.
Comment:
10. Landscaping:
Why is the loading and drop-off area landscaped?
Response:
The landscape plan has been revised to eliminate landscaping from the area north of the
loading zone. The area has been shown as paving blocks to provide a hard surface as
required by the fire department.
. ,
Mr. Mark Parry
August 19,2002
Page 13
.
.
We look forward to the final affirmative staff report and the Community Development board Meeting on
September 17,2002.
Barry . ywalec, PE
Director of Engineering
End:
L:\parry-14.doc
cc: Tom Cavanaugh, P.A.C. Land Development
Robert Pergolizzi, AICP
Wade Fischer, Morris Architects
John Lesniak, Anderson & Lesniak
File 997-190.10.06
':: I I! I
I II'. ........ J'. I' I
! i IU J II ~ ~ ... 'I J ! ~ ~II,
~5.i 11 I I 1* - ~~I'.I a
ifi · -. . r ;"
~ n I I ~ w~... 00'. 1iII1'" ...-' .ill II
~illl II 15~smN I illlS5'Hi!i.~!" , n ii' iiiiij hi~! ~
~I .'1 I. I 1 1__......1 .. 11dl'.,
.~ III ." IIIftIUH" S I J . JJJJJ .: J' I Ul1i.l
5~ 01 1~lmJ J .. I I II.;:
M ! ~!!!~ ~'i 'I ~'i5'- I. Ii i ii I!!~
it I 1 II I I I II i U ;~.I
I" ~ illd!!/! I.:fllll' d!lhll, lei I, m.~
, ,
.
~ i
;~ II hi
Ul
:s
t:) i-....
I-t ~
Zp;S
I-t (il1:4 ti
~ E-t 0 fIJ i:i
II!t ~..:I ~ ~
o~~ j~<
~p;~ III ~
17~E-t ~E .
~(il~ 2~~~
0..:11:>> t t!J g
CO t>>trn
o fit C ~ I ~ z_____~ II
om flJe~ -.
~~~ gi
r.' ~ ..:I 0
.... .... (il UJ
I-tC~
I> Ii:
I>-t
~
JQ
z -4 ~
.
~ ~
~ J ,I
~IBi ~.g IO!
II
I <~ ~ i1ft ill
~...
f i~i .
5!
II
Illn I ill l!iR
I'~
ill
~~n il!
!I ;1
I~
d lflJ
-<
Q.
~!:>
;-;-;-::------- ~I' i~
~ r.~ . " --- ~.t- z. 7 0
' 1) ~. "L---~1t -;
- · '" . ',1><'t.
"-.
._~
G~~~
~~f::'~
~'li4~.
i5;;~~
.><<=:%<
~1~t6
~~~~
~(t:;;:~
;;
'"
w
'"
;:)
Z;
-'
ti
'"
'"
"-
'" ~ J
Q b. J. '::
? -"l
iii"; Z
"l"l "
'" ;n ~
""
~l {;:l ...... " '~N
(i. Q
'"
CO
"
~
""
513
:.:t}';r'
~5d
"''''w
"'-:5g:
&;~S
~~~
~~~w
a~5~
";56
~~o~
Og.~l1:
'5~t"
SS~~,
;zooc,
\*th
'i"*
'&
Z
2i.J.j VJ"&h"h
-- ',-/
,~ I
b
o
d
;:!: 1
"'"1
j''-,
t!?
('J
---
.-1'1I........
i'
! I~
l':!~
I~~
....
.,.;
W:
'"
F"~I!
~::~
"'~
~g
v;._..;<,
2:
~
~
~~ ~
..........~
ii~:
7"
..--'
~
1-;;
~i=~i
~5j."~0
~!!i~
;xt<n:;t::!:5
Ie ;;;!~
l~~ ~~;E~~
m f~fu~~
~ -2
ci
o
'"
~~
Go
"
"'-
~~
.....,
~...
~~
----~.
~-
.
i .
.,
II
~I
;~
!!ae
~...
c
III
Z
o
~
c
a:
o
IL
fi :
u.....
.....
r"
t-... c
ZOOi!
IIJ... Z
:E c....
ILl":
011
..J C
IIJ 0"
> -.
lIJo~
Q~I
~
c
..J
< '
'i~o(
(;i'd:;!&
:::->~r~.~
~SLlz
i?<15.3~
~~~1=
vl.w>--~
i~~6
iE.(<:~~
I I !
. - I
I · I
I II
~r
...................
ci
o
<
._......-........_~ ~
~~~IOl/Ie~O
~
i.
~
"p~
il~
..I';
.f
iU
~w .
~I
~
lB.J
IUlii I
~.,111
1111.;
,111:1
_._.._ .~. ~ I~ I.
-_.
"-
;;
'"
~
~
'1
~ i<,
2 !e;e
~8
~:ti
.....
on
..
I
~
e.2.
0."
..,,,,
U~ :?~
1.)
c
~
~
~~
"Go
<-
0)(
JI'(5
:lID
r...
g<
ID~
1"-- ~4'J ~
, ---.
0'_" <~
~$f {
ijl 7('"
17 "-,r---...!i ~
/l Ij .7Yf" 'i;:
hnt q ^~ >~
H / j! >-~~..:: ! i~!
_ ,.;i "'li3g1' / [1
I . 'li:~ ~-,G}---..., f''i
I . II i I d . '- $,0 >1;::5., ! ill
I' I.t ftR i I l!I Ie, I! I I ~~ii;~ \ ! / ~,
._ !ll!ll' I~ a I dill il I'!i; ~,. ·
12 I. ~rl= i!i I' Ie i~! ~I :llh~---',r-,'! -
iii I! uHJ III ,I 2lil 1111 11..1. ,-Jij/l'
!!c H ~~J. ~ ~ ~ ~ II Ii fr-<,,/' l.%
Iii = ''':eillwd -,Ii I!i !e II w "'- fC;::'?
~Jil:~:ilI~DI:~I~I' , ~!' ~,~...,;,
"' ! ~'l!l!U "'UBI I hlhl,,,! '----J~--------_ i /f ,)it;',
~ .. .." ..I:' --.... f?[{"] ii
--tt:-'i/'
~____\ Ii
f/:41 /" ~"
1~; ; ~
fl.":!; / O~.!l. .. :.(l)
,Ji
/7 '*11
J > 'Ii"^~-
v;~ g ,.~t;,l,:~"
~* -*-'::<:,
w
i{
<(
"
4.
~
z
......
"
l{) ~
s
~g
i!Il"-
. r
~~
"
"-
ro'"
~g
.. '"
'"
.~~
~,:1
~"
2~
~
zz
ww
, ,
0"
~~
::~
;)'1
~~ :?
zt.~~
~~~;
~~i;
I -
sl
s'
"
(\l()fJ\ , ,
Ol7/_/
01::;1 it
,<. 416tb' .~-
..j !.::,;
:"
}v- tJ
::;i!
*o{)r~
mii
?S~E;:
F~0~~
t",
,
L..
,~
"
g
~2
~/~
('-,)
"
I
I~
01
~
u
~
1&.1
~i
c
III
z
o
t=
c
III:
o
D-
Ill:
o ..
u::
.-r=
z".
1&.1:'
li~
Sli
1&.1 ·
>.~
1&.1 0"
O~i
10
z
C
-'
",,;
ici
ilL
!
;
~
"
. '
z
A )
o
~II e .il
b !I~ I~ I I Jd
~I! -~11i 1''' ~ hI:
it it I~t ei ~ i ~t
~ ili iii !~ lilt ~I
i! ~i: ;~i Ii! ~; III ;i:
ll~ ~All I!I · fi ~ N II
II; !i~ll: ii Iii Ii ~il
~ jlh 11'1; ~I! I: ~ II ~I
"I M R ! E I ~ f! l!w:
ii !S!S J!! II ! i f III ~b
I~ .r:ll~i; :i I! i 5 . ~~I
~I m: Iii! !~! lid ;1 ~~!;
=-:; ~t_ C!li il Ii Ir II I
.. : ~; ....e ~
- .. r
B tr ti" S
Ig~ . i 5; (5! i E ir
~~ I I :~ C~'i r I ~~
.usll~ ~&t 1!2
I~" ~; ~ In; I i ~ ~ II
sl i! ,=11. l!v~ , i i ql
:~:i. Ill!!; ~lli ~i
l~~ I ~ ,~"ill ~~ r ~ i !I
larS I I! wi: II!JI ~a i ~ ~~
It: I! ill !,~ Ir I !it
ta~ r iu~fi ~. I!r; I i I II~ *
.Aa! a Ihll! ~" .~ II i ~ il!Sl
~i I ,'Il! !:lI b I, i ~
~u! ~ !I ~~~ ~ r:! II IIL~ . .
.. ~.... i -.0"..,..""....."...
"" ~
~ i
~
ii
I
.
~
o
d
.
Il
~
d
~
Idl ~!I-l-l
et.ij bkkll '
.~~ . ;
-
~
i
Ii
15 p
Ii Ii
(I ..II
ht
"
i !i, ~
s ~ ~
~U~
;I~
a~ l~
I~a
," i:
,"
v lC;!
~I
~
ilflJ
!m1ij I
.-11.
11"-,"
.11i:
_u_ ____-.Jit
-.
d
r.1 ~
i~Ii~IHi
II~U;iit
Ir..!lrlft
~I&&'- "
1'III~nirl
! lir;;
1':~l:dH
"ii-lh5
I~\! lIill
r&~ i i
~1~1&lIe".
~ 1~.3"
a .,3
r i~"~f~
bll!,Ali:
:lw"l!;~~3
7r:5~~ .'
~ a- ~
ib~iillii
ill_Ai;
r_wU5i
~!tI !
Ihl I
i-
t
s
. .
I
~
I
I~
~~
I ....
>
~
I f ~
I~
i
li
~
C
G:
o
IL
G:
o ..
U"':
.....
... ~ ..
z..c
....:1
li~
oJ'
..J I
.... 0 c
>-:
.... 0'"
0....
...
i
c
..J
p,;
oc
Ia:
, -
._~~---_ -___;...~o
j ,
I iB1,
~!l\
I, ·
I
'I. '-.
1
.
1, ~ i' i}f ~
PI ~!\\ 9
i j. ! E \ '; i
J \ 1 I 'I:
n I ~ 111~J.11 r.
!l ~ k- 1~!ICd J
\ ~ I . ;')
J - ,Jt-G i
i ; t ;~ II :
F I <.....: I 1p !I'll
~ 8;~ICd
.
.s
;;~ $ I
r-1--, I II
fJlJ :1,'
~r~j!t IL
~ f: i J~
11s~. ,"ll
. t It
~ '1
[~~ - ~ III
i~ ~I
J
,.
J
.i
E
\
I
~
II
.,
:=I
Ii
U
)-
C
ID
.
i
i
........-.. .-. - '---1
..
fIc!)!:
-------- I
.. .c_1i
I r ~
. I - i
& I:! ~ I ... 01
BllilOO, ~ II;l !
i ijI !III:
J ~ !n
j'j i"
. . II,
& "=!
! ~j~l dl I.
Jr) h.' I
! e !i!iJ
II -~. I litili
J 'Him
I....... 01
)
I ti
! , -I
~i
~
lff~]H
~~I
~ ! ~i
t
z
o
~
C
It:
o
IL
It:
o ..
u::
r=
IE" ·
1&.1:1
li~
SJS
1&.10"
>-",
1&.1 0"
O~i
o
z
c
-'
u
.c
a:
! nli~
I I ~ I
I I.
( i' x".. -...
, i. 1 ~11f
i P \ F
i- i ~ T .1
I ~ ii 1 , 'nU.
It H ) I.
iihm j! If
I -,.... r :. t
I H I
Ii ..
~
I
q
, r
~J
I
----
-or
"
i ~
~l! '
il~
:! I'
~.
li~
:!l II
l ; I.RJ
--1 P J !lIlij I
c ."11.
~ 1IIIii
.111..
~ ~ t
J-J
~~ ti ~ I
~ ~DI
t U il..
I ~d~f
1.:1 U 00
.. ....
t . I fi
Ig.~ .~ i~~ ~
. ;I ~ Ii ~ _t~
. ~ : !I:
i I' ..,. "nl
I I; i!I J Ii I!i
: !lf~I~G .
e! I ~ !9 [t. ~ ---.
i..
Iii ...
Ii. . -~ ~
I ~Hl
I I Pt
f ~-' it.
, .. '111
(J I ~ ~~!:, M
I ~ II J t I ....!t
: 'ill H iUith
11 'I
~Iil.h
i.. .. ..
baJ"""_-
'. . . .....
" .
.' " "
.......nl
,.
e
.
"
c
:E
2
z
-
:E
o
IICll
Z
o
()
==
w
5
m
caD.
"l:II ..
";: 0
0(.)
ii: =-
.. ID
IDICII
-
ca "l:II
! :i
ca.....
ID .
-(.)
(.)ci
a:
a
z
-
::.r:::
. -. , a:
c:c
a.
IICll
w
."
<.0 0
I a.
O"l 0
I a:
a.
,
I
,
I
--'-- -
I
, l;o
I ~
Ill> C'I
, 1 g
+-. - 3 en
--
-
'lg co
I ; 6-,8 - en
-
u
'([1 Cii ID
I -~ -
> 0 :c
CD -- u
, .~. .... =11 ..
I~ I ~ I -- cc
ID en
"i:
- 'ii ..
,0. . -----~ c u 0
I: I w en :::liE
I""""L:_I - ,
e
.
c
~h.
.O-,IL
\
.
\
.
~
.
\
.
\
. -. 1
1.t-.OI I
ir1
I Q) : r--------------\
I ' ,
I ~ : : '
J.:.. ~------_____nn__nnJ
.8
c
'"
c..
o
I
! of-,g,
I
I
------)
.
,
\..--.............
---
---
-_....,..-
<.0
I
O"l
+
l..L.J
:E
::I
-
Z
-
:E
o
IICII
Z
o
()
==
1&1
5
m
ftIa.
'a ..
.~8
i:i: :I:
.. CI)
.sa
ftI 'a
! :i
ftI....
CI) .
-u
u.
ClC
Ii
c:J
z
52
a::
c:c
A.
IICII
1&1
en
o
A.
o
a::
A.
~
@
C'I
o
o
C'I
-
en
.....
-
co
!
C'I
Q; en
-
> u
CI) CI)
(:) -
..... .E
..... u
CI) II ..
ClC
ca CI) en
.. ii "i:
ca ..
c:J u 0
en ==
. ,
e
.
j r
-"r..t
t..1
4f~li
'I '11
I~tt
~!~i
HIg
it)}
jJ -
iiI ~ -
!11 ~ d
i~- I ~I
I~l i I nlj
'. ~~~~ Ifuh I
\u ~:; i 1 ::: . 1
1e ,~r::;!::I :n I ::!::I!::II ~
~ \ ~
~! ~
~ 1: ~
;t ~
...y lfOIOIO
~
.3
~
~:[ l~ \1
.110;;- \.
~o:::i _._.....
. .-.
l~
+
~.
...-
...
,
\ ~~u
, ::Ul
\ ~:t I
, ~l
~'
CIS a.
:!!~
~(.)
i:i: =-
.. CD
CDIIClI
==~'U
::) ! :i
- CIS'"
ZCD.
- C3Q
== CI5
o a.
D
Z
o
u
==
III
5
III
l;o
~ N
0
Ill> 0
i ~
3 G)
--
-
CD
- en
-
Q) u
CD
-
t 0-
N'c
.... II e
::...c:r:
CD .!!
- - ..
CIS ..
C u 0
III cn:::E
.; -...
.
.
. i
<.
.H
"'rot
~ol
:h -
HH
liH
~!~i
HJI
llll
\
~
+
\
\
b
"'Y -..-0
'"
2
A
~
I
iri
I J Lu_ ___~ .
,J ---- _---~
t --
------- \
.
.
\
\
\ :H
. ~~
\ c ~
I~
.~.
C'IIa..
"ClI ...
.- 0
~()
ii:>
... CD
CDCIl
-
:::E C'II "ClI
::>> i! i
- C'II'"
ZCD.
- uq
== Cl);
o a.
a
Z
o
(.)
==
1&1
5
ID
~
~
+
<ill
..
!
C'4
o
o
~
en
-
-
CD
C"'I
a;
>
G>
.....
G>
as
..
ca
c:J
III
1:)
CD
-
b:c
c;: e
. ClC
- III
CD .-
- ...
C'II ...
U 0
cn::!E
.
.
\
,
\
u
!
..---
I
Pj CD
~Ji !
I lL_
g
~
'f
~
,
\
,
\
,
\
, r!
\ II
'0-~
lIS a.
'V ..
.- 0
~(.)
i&: ::0:
.. CD
CDICIl
:::IE -;; "a
::J ! :i
- lIS'"
Z CD -
- <:)Co!
:::IE ~
o a.
Cll
Z
o
(.)
==
w
5
m
~
~
.. C'I
@ 0
.. 0
! ~
...
-
c CD
ca
ii: :!
_ u
~b.!!
... C'I .c
- II e
......c:c
"'a -; 1ft
.. - -;:
:c ~ 2;
I- en :E
.
f 1
.
.
< '
\
,
caD.
'U ..
.- 0
~U
ii: ==
.. CD
CDIICII
:E -;; 'U
~ ~ :i
- ca...
ZCD.
-c:s"!
:E ~
o a.
C
Z
o
U
==
1&1
5
III
~~~
.......
+++
\lI>\lI>
..... ..
sH
C\oI
o
o
~
en
....
-
co
c
ca
A:
- en
CI) -
> g
CI) _ -
.... 0-
C\oI"c
- II e
ca = cl
U....en
.- CD-
- ..
ell ..
U 0
cn:E
~
.
I
,- ~~.;-'\"-;Ol-;T't
,'J-,LL
,
t ~ fr S- ~ ~ b~ s-
f'':; s>''3 ~ T ~~;
~Ic ~!~ :,,:'"- :.<'- ~~ .- ~i~
';'lz '2]:0:' +,e .,:;,
i'.. ;c
.
:2
~
-
Z
-
~
o
a
z
o
u
==
III
5
all
. -
-ae-
'58
ii:-
>
ai'&
--a
!:i
.....
CD -
UU
-c
Go
N
o
-..
in
N
-..
......
o
fil-
3
R
t:: $:I
0 en
-- -
- ~ u
ftI CD
-
> in :c
CI>> ~
- 0-'1
L III
- CD en
en c; ';::
..
T ftI u 0
o~ III en ::::Ii
~
I '
Ii
'" e CU -
0 ~ ,,2-
.CO
oU
JIIo ~~ , I ii:-
>
-Q)
, :GCII
! ::E -"
CUe
:::) :l:cu
- :;...
z CD -
-U
U.
- ~
:E a.
0
ca
z
0
J u N
== 0
III -..
- an
5 N
-..
1"0-
m 0
,,"'.,IC. ,~I..;'
,
-t~
I I I I
A ~ A ~t
;I~ tl] ;I~ ;I~
,
1
~l~
:Rz
. ~
-S-
~!:
~.
~.:
':~
~
~.
M
g Si:
.- UI
- 1:S
ca ~ Q)
I; in :=
iii ~
0, C
.c Q).!!
"Ii:: _ ..
o ca"
Z (,)0
cn::E
1.1
r-,
I I
L_-I
I~l
I
)l(i
I
I ", .I'~ ll~ 4( : ~ I ! ~ ill ql; ; n n; a;
~~ Us! I: IJ Ii :::~...dUhH.
~113!.1 II II i
~! i -I; ~ Ii I III ; I
1IIIIIlllllillli
h I I adl ~ Ill., I I I i I
~ 1IIIri, III lllllllllhlllllll, m
· - ..J!l~l'l'~" · II ~
l"J'J'i' '~"'J" I ~
z"-
0<(
J j ~ ~
111141 I ~ ~
i in ill ;
11 i I
~ -~ II ~II
~I
I lh,! I, J - I h I I gll
Im.il!'! it iiil II :. ~ I I ~.I
. ~ .d. .b I d ~L I 1111 l:i
i: "l~' I I I 'I I-J
~,I : I I 0
-~ I ~
I 0:
'71~
,... :.. I iijj
---- c ..,.... ~ f!~~'
I' 'tl' II i~.H
I ..' I li~~
II i I I It I m
Iii Ii I Illl!1 ! II H
II, III ! :"1'," I , ;j
~" UI ; ~n~ i~! I ~JJ~~ ~ "
1111111,liI11Iilll! ""+-;--1 ~
II' 'II Al!i !blll J '- I
lill !"I i!IIIII;I;lil; 'vj> - j11Ih:!.
." s! It~d~ I. II.
~~.. ~..IIi~.. ~ .. .. I
-r-.
',I
.,
".
)....)-1
.~
"~--E
.
. .
r'-----
j~~
Inl
I
E I
.0',~ .~I'.L.
I
:~<
,"
~
.
,
I
rlii
:-'"
, ,
~ll ~~~
-3e-
158
ii:>
-.!!! ~.I
IIIIIIiii fti 'a
::>> !:i
_ ca..l
Z .!!cj
- uci
:IE iii.
o
a
z
o
Co)
=-~
III .......
5~
mO
~
Stll
.- CIlI
- -
ca b U
> ~ .
CD in i
iii 0, _ e
.c cc
1: .!!~
o ca-
Z U 0
cn::E
~.~I
~~
~~
~
~
~- '
~
. . (
-ae-
.-0
i" ~(,)
.13 u:: ,;
"! - ",::, - ~Ii ~J -Q)
- ~ - ~ ~ ~ =a
'F ~ .~ c./J '<i- '<i- ::e 1;i-a
::) !i
- ....
Z Q) .
-u
- Uci
::e A.
0
a
z
0
, U N
~ ~
~ ~ 0
~ 1&1 -..
- It)
5 N
-..
r---
0
m
.
~
Sil
C ~
0
- .
- 1
ftI ~
> -
CD :a
-
1&1 0- ~
.c
- Q)o!!
:s - ..
. ..
0 u 0
en cn2
:2
:)
-
z
-
:2
o
a
z
o
(.)
=-
III
5
m
ftI .
-a!-
i8
ii: .
=-
ai"'&
--a
!C
ftI~
CD .
UU
ci
A.
N
o
.....
II)
N
.....
......
o
~-:~;F:s~-f-I ~3',Ll
, ,
~r t, ~ ~;~~
~
c: ft
0 en
= ~ 1:)
ca GJ
-
It t in :c
, , - Ji
I I III
~ - CD en
~ $- ~ en ii ";:
T T ~!~ ca ..
." ." ~i eX 0
';'=:: ';'z III :Ii
" Ie
;;
"
.
.
ca -
'Ve-
l8
1&:-
~
-.
:IE ta
-'V
cae
:t t!l
-
Z . -
-u
- UcC
:E A.
0
a
z
0
U N
=- ,0
......
.. an
~ - 'N
~ 5 ......
a I"'-
J;
0
aI
'I: '
. .~..
II',
~i
j
I
L ;- ,01-'1 , ,q.,.L i , :J
i ,0-,'0 I I I
, , : '\
I I I ~ I I ]
I
~ ~ $- ~ ~ ~
T T ~
ji~ ?I'i T ~
." "L: ~I~ ","" ~ ,~ ."
~! ~I' '";-e ~:# :E '.;:ci ~i~ 7~
i': ;:: ;:: i"
?['
~
~
1
.
St'
.
~
i iii I
-e.
nI -
>0 .
CD 110
iii -11-
U .J!.!!
:I eX j
.
'"
~
11
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS
July 25, 2002
12fqj\~f1)
~DUDZ- OGor7
Mr. Mark T. Parry, Planner
City of Clearwater
Planning and Development Services
City Municipal Services Building
100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: Bayview Condominium -700 North Osceola Avenue
Application for Flexible Development
Case Number FLD-2002-060l7
Dear Mr. Parry:
We are enclosing fifteen (15) copies ofthe following:
FBll:
1. Flexible Development Application for Comprehensive Infill Approval.
2. Affidavit to Authorize Agent.
3. Deed.
4. Revised Plan sets including the following:
a) Preliminary Site Plan
b) Landscape and Irrigation Plans
c) Building Floor Plans, including the Parking Garage Floor Plans (entry level 1 and
garage level 2)
d) Boundary, Topographic, and Tree Survey
5. Colored building elevations.
We are also in receipt of the official DRC comments via your e-mail dated July 12, 2002. Our
responses to the DRC comments are given below in the same order that they were originally presented.
Comment:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees due prior to
issuance of building permits for 21 additional units. (Residential expansion from 7
apartments to 28 condominium units; crediting existing 7 units) Contact Deb
Richter at 562-4817.
2639 McCORMICK DRIVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759
Tel: (727) 724-8422 · Fax: (727) 724-8606
.
.
Mr. Mark T. Parry
July25, 2002
Page .2
Response:
We understand the impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits and will coordinate
with Debbie Richter.
Comment:
2. Stormwater:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one
sheet. Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood
zone, etc. on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity, Staff mayor may not have
additional comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be
re-reviewed by the DRC prior to review by the CDB.
Response:
Comment:
The Site Plan was originally superimposed on a screened-back copy of the topographic
survey. Since the existing topography is somewhat complex, considerable information is
requested to properly depict existing conditions.
Some of the extraneous information shown on the topographic survey has been removed
from the site plan to more clearly show the proposed improvements.
Separate landscaping and demolitions plans were originally submitted and are included in
this resubmittal package.
3. Traffic engineering:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one
sheet. Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood
zone, etc. on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity, Staff mayor may not have
additional comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be
rc-reviewed by the DRC prior to review by the CDB.
Response:
The Site Plan was originally superimposed on a screened-back copy of the topographic
survey. Since the existing topography is somewhat complex, considerable information is
requested to properly depict existing conditions.
Some of the extraneous information shown on the topographic survey has been removed
from the site plan to more clearly show the proposed improvements.
Separate landscaping and demolitions plans were originally submitted and are included in
this resubmittal package.
, .
.
'.
Mr. MarkT. Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 3
Comment:
b)
There are five motorcycle spots shown. These spots don It count as part of required
parking (1-1.5 per unit required = 28 spaces minimum if that is the number of units
proposed - see planning comments for density).
Response:
Ten (10) motorcycle spaces are being provided, (five (5) spaces on each of the two (2)
garage floors). As shown on the cover sheet, these spaces have not been included in the
tabulation of "required" parking spaces.
Comment:
c) Revise site plan to show dimensions of all parking spaces, loading areas, fire lanes,
drive aisles, columns and column spacings;
Response:
Full size (24" x 36") copies of all building floor plans, including the parking levels
(Level 1 and Level 2) are included in the plan sets.
Comment:
d) No dimensions are shown for space labeled "C" - show dimensions. No credit for
compact spaces.
Response:
The one (1) compact space on level 1 is 8'-4" wide by 19'-8" deep the two (2) compact
spaces on level 2 are 8'-6" wide by 19' deep. The dimensions are shown on the parking
plans. These spaces have not been included in the tabulation of "required" parking
spaces.
Comment:
e) All spaces must be a minimum of 19 feet in length - along the west end - some are
shown at 16 feet - clarify.
Response:
All regular and handicapped spaces are 19 feet deep. The 16 foot dimension is a column
dimension. The plans have been clarified.
Comment:
1) A minimum of nine feet in width is required for all parking spaces. Additional
width may be necessary where columns or walls may impede maneuverability or
vision (3-1402 A). The site plan needs to show dimensioning for all columns and
column spacing. The columns cannot encroach upon the parking space.
Response:
The minimum width for all spaces except compact spaces is 19 feet. Columns do not
encroach into proposed parking spaces.
.
.
Mr. MarkT. Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 4
Comment:
g) There are three parking spaces shown on Eldridge Street which back out into the
right-of-way. These are not permissible and need to be removed (3-1402 C).
Response:
These three (3) parking spaces have been removed and replaced with two (2) parallel
parking spaces north ofthe north right-of-way line of Eldridge Street.
Comment:
h) Need large-scale plans of parking levels - can't read 8 ~ by 11 submittal. It's not
clear how Level One and Level Two parking areas work - Revise plans to clarify.
Response:
Full size (24" x 36") parking level plans are included as part of the resubmittal.
Comment:
i) The two spaces at the entrance along Osceola Avenue are unsafe and need to be
removed.
Response:
The building plans have been revised to move the Level 2 gate westward (Osceola
Avenue entrance). The east building wall has also been revised to allow clear view from
these spaces of any traffic exiting the building.
Comment:
j) Existing on street parking along south side of Eldridge St. must remain for the
entire length of the street.
Response:
All existing parking on the south side of Eldridge Street will remain, except for the most
western space which will be striped as a "fire lane" as requested by the fire marshall at a
meeting on Friday, July 19,2002.
Comment:
k) It is unclear how circle and surrounding areas are intended to be used - clarify;
Response:
The circle of decorative brick pavers has been removed. Parking spaces parallel to and
north of the north right-of-way of Eldridge Street are for temporary guest parking. The
plans have been revised to clearly show the proposed paving.
.
.
Mr. Mark T. Parry
July 25, 2002
PageS
Comment:
, ,
I) Indicate where any gates will be located and provide adequate stacking spaces;
Response:
Comment:
Gate locations and the minimum 40- foot stacking distances are shown on the Level 1 and
Level 2 parking garage plans.
m) Need a minimum of two car lengths or 40 feet from edge of pavement of the public
roadway;
Response:
Comment:
The plans show more than 40 feet between the proposed gate (Level 2) and the edge of
pavement of Osceola Avenue. Osceola Avenue is one-way (northbound) at this location.
On Eldridge Street the proposed gate (Levell) has been moved northward under the
building overhang, thereby providing a minimum stacking length of 40 feet from the edge
of pavement.
n) All of the above (3 a - m) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next
DRC review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,
2002 DRC.
Response:
Comment:
Okay.
4. General engineering:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one
sheet. Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood
zone, etc. on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have
additional comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be
re-reviewed by the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
Response:
The Site Plan was originally superimposed on a screened-back copy of the topographic
survey. Since the existing topography is somewhat complex, considerable information is
requested to properly depict existing conditions.
Some of the extraneous information shown on the topographic survey has been removed
from the site plan to more clearly show the proposed improvements.
.
.
Ivlr. Mark T. Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 6
Comment:
Separate landscaping and demolitions plans were originally submitted and are included in
this resubmittal package.
b) Eldridge Street will have to meet City of Clearwater standards;
Response:
Comment:
Ok - Eldridge Street will be widened and reconstructed in accordance with current City
of Clearwater standards and specifications.
c) A sidewalk four feet in width will be required along all right-of-ways;
Response:
Comment:
A concrete sidewalk, 4 feet wide will be provided in Osceola Avenue and Eldridge Street.
d) Clarify the use of brick pavers in the right-of-way;
Response:
Comment:
The decorative brick pavers have been removed.
e) The cul-de-sac shown doesn't meet City of Clearwater standards;
Response
Comment:
A cul-de-sac is not proposed. A three-point turn can be provided as discussed with the
Fire Marshall at a meeting on Friday, July 19, 2002. The plans have been clarified to
show this turning movement.
f) There are shaded interior landscape areas shown in the right-of-way. Revise to
show them completely within the confmes of the property;
Response:
Ok-See revised plans.
.
.
Mr. Mark T. Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 7
Comment:
g) A drop curb will be required afallproposeddriveaprons;
Response:
The plans have been revised to show existing curbs to be removed and replaced with
"drop curb".
Comment:
h) There is a two-inch gas main along Osceola Avenue that is not shown on the
drawings. Revise the site plan to show that gas main;
Response:
Ok-The plans have been revised.
Comment:
i) ADA compliant sidewalk ramps are required at the intersection of Osceola Avenue
and Eldridge Street.
Response:
Ok-Ramps have been shown on the plans.
Comment:
j) Need to core the existing sanitary sewer manhole for sewer connections prior to the
issuance of any permits;
Response:
Ok-A note to core the existing sanitary manhole to accommodate the proposed force
main has been added to the plans.
Comment:
k) All of the above (4 a -i) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next
DRC review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,
2002 DRC.
Response:
Okay.
.
.
Mr. Mark T. Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 8
Comment:
5. Building:
a) Indicate the transition line from X to AEflood zone;
Response:
Comment:
The AE flood zone line has been shown on the site plan.
b) Construction within 18 feet of existing seawall not permitted; would need to
reconstruct the seawall which would mean there would be work within the
jurisdictional area - would need to secure permits through DEP;
Response:
Comment:
The low seawall serves no purpose at this location. The plans have been revised to show
that the seawall will be removed.
c) All of the above (5 a - b) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next
DRC review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,
2002 DRC.
Response:
Comment:
6. Planning:
Okay.
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one
sheet. Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood
zone, etc. on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have
additional comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be
re-reviewed by the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
Response:
The Site Plan was originally superimposed on a screened-back copy of the topographic
survey. Since the existing topography is somewhat complex, considerable information is
requested to properly depict existing conditions.
Some of the extraneous information shown on the topographic survey has been removed
from the site plan from the site plan to more clearly show the proposed improvements.
.
.'
Mr. Mark T. Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 9
Comment:
Separate landscaping and demolitions plans were origInally submitted and are included in
this resubmittal package.
b) Need large scale plans of parking levels - cannot read 8 ~ by 11;
Response:
Comment:
Full size (24" x 36") parking level plans are included as part of the submittal.
c) Clarify the number of units proposed for the site - 1.11 acres will support 27
dwelling units where 28 are proposed. Either the site has to grow or the number of
units needs to decrease - revise application;
Response:
Comment:
The size of the upland portion of the site is determined by measuring the area above the
mean high water line. The project surveyor has confirmed that the mean high water line
is ambulatory. As a natural monument, the mean high water shoreline is a freeform line
that is constantly being reshaped by tides, currents, wave action, and storm events. An
updated survey of the present location of the mean high water line was conducted on July
9,2002 and confirms that the upland area of the site is now 1.12 acres. This area is now
shown on the cover sheet and in the flexible development application.
d) The parking requirement is based on the number of units - see above comment -
need minimum of 27 spaces that are meeting all dimensional standards - unclear if
this is met;
Response:
Comment:
Based on the zoning code a minimum of 42 parking spaces are required (28 x 1.5). The
applicant is proposing to provide a total of 63 car parking spaces and 10 motorcycle
spaces. A complete tabulation is shown on the cover sheet. The motorcycle parking and
compact car spaces are not included in the total spaces provided.
e) Clarify how the proposed height was calculated, need all details about
measurements on the plans;
.
.
Mr. Mark T.Parry
July25, 2002
Page 10
Response:
Comment:
The building height has been calculated using the three different methods listed.
A. Midpoint on Sloping Roofto the Elevation ofthe First Floor.
94.92 feet (midpoint of root) - 19.0 feet (elevation of first floor) = 75.92 feet.
B. Midpoint on Sloping Roof to the Flood Elevation
------' --...... ~
/-/..----
/'
94.92 feet (midpoint of root) - 13.5 feet (elevation of first floor)r= 81.42 feet. /
These building heights are shown on the cover sheet. ~
t) It is not clear how the proposed height, bulk is in keeping with adjacent properties -
see General Applicability criteria - clarify;
Response:
Comment:
The proposed development is in harmony (height, bulk) with the surrounding area in that
it is on a small lot almost fully covered by building/parking. The northwest expansion
area downtown periphery plan encourages upscale residential redevelopment and states
"The area should be redeveloped with multi-family townhomes and condominiums". To
effectively comply with this plan goal and the goal of high density (25 units/acre) in the
downtown zoning district it is necessary to increases the height. This trend is evident in
recent redevelopment approvals (900 N. Osceola and Harrill redevelopment at the
Clearwater Bay Marina site). Also 500 N. Osceola Avenue is an existing 9 story building
located south of Eldridge Street. This redevelopment is in keeping with the
redevelopment trend of high-densities with high impervious-surface-ratios, reduced
setbacks, and increased height. Although no building setback is required, the applicant
has set the building back and provided landscaped/open space areas on all sides.
g) What is the existing and proposed valuation?
.
.
Mr. Mark T. Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 11
Response:
Comment:
Response:
Comment:
Response:
Comment:
Response:
The existing and proposed evaluation is shown in Paragraph 2 at the top of page 4 of60f
the flexible development application.
h) State how will the proposal not affect the health and safety of surrounding
properties;
The redevelopment of this site to an upscale condominium will not adversely affect
health or safety of neighboring residents. The increased height is compensated for by
providing building setbacks on all sites where none are required. The impervious surface
ratio (58.3%) is well below the maximum 95% allowed. Landscaping will be provided
on the site periphery, particularly on the north side screening adjacent residential uses.
. The redevelopment would have a positive effect on values and would substantially
upgrade the area.
i) Show more detail on architectural plans, what type of relief is proposed - five feet?
Full size (24" x 36") copies of all the building floor plans are included in the resubmittal.
j) Provide separate plans for utilities, drainage and landscaping.
Separate landscaping plans were submitted with the original applications and are
included in the resubmittal. Now that the extraneous topographical information has
been removed from the site plan it is clearer and easier to understand. Separate utility
and drainage plans do not appear necessary, since the proposed improvements for this
small site are very minor as itemized below:
· Roof and site drainage will be directed to a stormwater vault at the southwest
comer of the building. The discharge is into the existing City stormwater inlet at
the west end of Eldridge Street.
· The building floor drains from the two parking levels (levell and level 2) will be
a separate system that discharges into a commercial oil and water separator at the
northwest comer of the building.
.
.
Mr. Mark T. Parry
July 25, 2002 .
Page 12
Comment:
· Domestic water will be provided by a new water meter and service line connected
to the existing 4" watermain in Eldridge Street.
· Fire flow will be provided by a new fire line with a double detector check valve
assembly connected to the existing 4" watermain in Eldridge Street a fire.
department connection and a new fire hydrant are also proposed at the northwest
comer ofthe intersection of Osceola Avenue and Eldridge Street.
k) Have neighbors been notified? Old Clearwater Bay neighborhood association
should be contacted by the applicant as soon as possible to get comments;
Response:
Comment:
The applicant will notify the neighborhood associations as suggested.
I) Revise the site plan to eliminate all use of chainlink fencing;
Response:
Comment:
The existing chain link: fence along the north right-of-way line is owned by others and is
shown to remain. No other special fencing or walls are proposed to be located on the
site.
m) Clarify that the area to the west of the site is not wetlands under the jurisdiction of
the State of Florida. If it is, a 25 foot setback will be necessary;
Response:
Comment:
The wetland limits and 25 foot setback are clearly shown on the plans. No setback is
shown east of the vertical seawall.
n) Need periphery Plan goals/objectives discussed in written format - how are they
being met?
Response:
Plan/Policies
1.1 Scale and context of buildings should promote a pedestrian friendly environment.
1.2 New development, renovations and expansions will adhere to downtown design
guidelines.
1.3 Shared parking should be accomplished wherever possible.
.
.
Mr. Mark T. Parry
July 2~, 2002
Page 13
1 A Consistent zoning and appropriate land use requirements should exist throughout
the Expansion Area.
1.5 Connection between Clearwater Harbor and the Pinellas Trail should. be
accomplished.
1.6 The Expansion Area should be tied to the downtown core.
1.7 Gateway signage should be erected at the north boundary of the area in order to
identify it as the entry to downtown.
1.8 Renovation, rehabilitation and reuse of historic resources are encouraged.
Flexibility through the site plan review process should be utilized so that historic
resources may be retained and reused.
1.9 Residential Area
1. Any new development, renovations or expansions should be designed to create an
urban pedestrian environment.
11. Any new development, renovation or expansion should be designed to create an
urban pedestrian environment.
111. The City holds rights-of-way that dead-end at the harbor and they should be
retained and improved.
IV. New large-scale residential projects should contain elements that encourage
pedestrian use.
The proposed plans indicate construction of new sidewalk on Eldridge Street and Osceola
Avenue and an ADA accessible curb ramp will be provided on the northwest comer of
Osceola Avenue and Eldridge Street. Building entrances will be accessible via paved
walkways which will create a pedestrian friendly environment.
The redevelopment is in compliance with downtown zoning regulations. As of this date
the Community Development Code Article 3, Division 5 does not contain Downtown
District guidelines. The project is in compliance with Section 2-903 of the Community
Development Code.
Shared on-street parking is available within Eldridge Street. Additional parallel parking
for guests and deliveries has been provided north of the north right-of-way line of
Eldridge Street. These parallel spaces are outside the gated parking garage and are
available for visitors and public use, however, all parking within the gated area is
reserved for residential use.
The existing zoning is Downtown District (D) and the Land Use Designation is Central
Business District (CBD). This is consistent and appropriate within the northwest
expanSIOn area.
The construction of new sidewalk on Eldridge Street will maintain the connection
between the property abutting Clearwater Harbor and the Pinellas Trail.
.
.
Mr. Mark T. Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 14
Comment:
Response:
Comment:
Response:
As described in the new expansion area downtown periphery plan the northwest
expansion area is bounded by Jones Street to the south and is tied to the downtown core.
The prevalence of sidewalks provides this connection. The proposed redevelopment
project is located within easy walking distance of the downtown core. (1/4 mile to Drew
Street).
The site is not along a gateway to downtown, therefore, no gateway signage is
recommended at this location. Gateway signage should be. considered by others in the
future at the northern boundary of the expansion area at the Clearwater Bay Marina site.
The site does not contain historic resources.
The proposed site plan provides new sidewalk connections between existing sidewalks
and the building entrances and parking areas.
Eldridge Street is a public right-of-way that dead-ends at Clearwater Harbor, the site plan
respects the existing right-of-way and vacation is not requested.
0) All required site triangles must be met - 20 foot by 20 foot from the back of
pavement for all driveways, curb cuts, etc. Site plans to be revised prior to next
DRC review;
Site triangles have been shown on the plans.
p) All of the above (6 a - p) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next
DRC review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,
2002 DRC.
Okay.
.
.
Mr. Mark T. Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 15
Comment:
6. Solid waste:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one
sheet. Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood
zone, etc. on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have
additional comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be
re-reviewed by the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
Response:
Comment:
The Site Plan was originally superimposed on a screened-back copy ofthe topographic
survey. Since the existing topography is somewhat complex, considerable information is
requested to properly depict existing conditions.
Some of the . extraneous information shown on the topographic survey has been removed
from the site plan to more clearly show the proposed improvements.
Separate landscaping and demolitions plans were originally submitted and are included in
this resubmittal package.
b) Clarify how solid waste containers will be moved out to the street to service - a curb
cut may be necessary;
Response:
Comment:
A note on the plans confirms that trash removal will be provide by a rollout dumpster
operated by private maintenance staff to a curbside location on a schedule approved by
the City Solid Waste Department. The plans have also been revised to show existing
curbs to be removed and replaced with "drop curb".
c) All of the above (7 a - b) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next
DRC review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,
2002 DRC.
Response:
Okay.
.
.
Mr. Mark T.Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 16
Comment:
8. Land resource:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one
sheet. Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood
zone, etc. on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have
additional comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be
re-reviewed by the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
Response:
Comment:
The Site Plan was originally superimposed on a screened-back copy ofthe topographic
survey. Since the existing topography is somewhat complex, considerable information is
requested to properly depict existing conditions.
Some of the extraneous information shown on the topographic survey has been removed
from the site plan to more clearly show the proposed improvements.
Separate landscaping and demolitions plans were originally submitted and are included in
this resubmittal package.
b) Two trees missing from tree survey, resubmit with corrections.
Response:
Comment:
The survey has been revised to show the missing trees.
c) Show all trees on the Site Plan.
Response:
Comment:
Existing trees as surveyed in the field have been shown on the site plan.
d) All of the above (8 a - c) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next
DRC review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,
2002 DRC.
Response:
Okay.
.
.
Mr.Mark T.Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 17
Comment:
9. Fire:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one
sheet. Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood
zone, etc. on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have
additional comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be
re-reviewed by the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
Response:
Comment:
The Site Plan was originally superimposed on a screened-back copy ofthe topographic
survey. Since the existing topography is somewhat complex, considerable information is
requested to properly depict existing conditions.
Some of the extraneous information shown on the topographic survey has been removed
from the site plan to more clearly show the proposed improvements.
Separate landscaping and demolitions plans were originally submitted and are included in
this resubmittal package.
b) Need to provide a fire lane 20 feet in width. If Eldridge Street is to be used as the
fire lane, it must be widened to a total of 30 feet (back of curb to back of curb). Any
widening and/or use of the street as a fire lane must not effect parking on the south
side of the street. The widening and use of the fire lane may impact the proposed
loading zone;
Response:
Okay - Eldridge Street will be widened to 30 feet (back to back of curbs) in accordance
with current City of Clearwater standards and specifications. All existing parking on the
south side of Eldridge Street will remain except for the most western space which will be
striped as the "Fire Lane" as requested by the fire marshall at a meeting on Friday, July
19, 2002. The plan has been revised to show the proposed pavement and parking on
Eldridge Street.
.
.
Mr. Mark T. Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 18
Comment:
c) Provide a fire hydrant on Eldridge Street and locate the Fire Department
Connection within 40 feet of the hydrant and at least 15 feet from the building;
Response:
Comment:
A new fire hydrant is proposed to be installed at the northwest comer of the intersection
of Osceola Avenue and Eldridge Street (the southeast comer of the site). This proposed
fire hydrant and the proposed fire department connection are shown on the revised plans.
d) Provide an approved turnaround for Fire Apparatus as per NFP A 1, Section 3-5.2
Response:
Comment:
An acceptable three-point turn can be provided at the west end of Eldridge Street as
discussed with the Fire Marshall at a meeting on Friday, July 19, 2002. The plans have
been clarified to show this turning movement.
e) Provide a complete High Rise package, including but not limited to, Fire Pump,
Generator, Standpipe System, Sprinkler System, Fire Alarm System, Fire Control
Room, Fireman's Phone System w/Jacks, Stairwell smoke removal system. Provide
prior to the issuance of any permits;
Response:
Comment:
This information, if required, will be provided prior to issuance of any building permits.
t) Gates require an approved Emergency Entry System as per Pinellas County
Ordinance 98-4. Show on Construction plans prior to the issuance of any permits;
Response:
Comment:
Okay - Will be provided, if required, prior to issuance of any building permit.
g) Provide a Knox Key Box on building for emergency egress, as per NFP A 1. Show on
Construction Plans prior to the issuance of any permits;
.
.
Mr. MarkT. Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 19
Response:
Comment:
Okay - Will be provided, if required, prior to issuance of any building permit.
h) All of the above (8 a -d) to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15, 2002
DRC.
Respons~:
Comment:
Okay.
i) All of the above (8 e - g) to be provided prior to the issuance of any permits.
Response:
Comment:
Okay - If required for the permitting of this size building.
10. Landscaping:
a) The landscape plan looks like it's still in its early stages. It just doesn't feel like it's
hanging together yet. Bottlebrush trees are probably small for a 100-foot tall
building. Utilize living groundcover instead of all the mulch along the north
property line. Address as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC review. The next
deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15, 2002 DRC;
Response:
Comment:
Mark Parry reviewed the landscape plan during a telephone call with the landscape
architect on Thursday, July 18, 2002. We understand that all issues were resolved.
Revised landscape plans are included with this submittal.
11. Environmental:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one
sheet. Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood
zone, etc. on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have
additional comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be
re-reviewed by the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
Response:
The Site Plan was originally superimposed on a screened-back copy of the topographic
survey. Since the existing topography is somewhat complex, considerable information is
requested to properly depict existing conditions.
.
.
Mr. MarkT. Parry
July25,2002
Page 20
Comment:
Some of the extraneous information shown on the topographic survey has been removed
from the site plan to more clearly show the proposed improvements.
Separate landscaping and demolitions plans were originally submitted and are included in
this resubmittal package.
b) The swimming pool encroaches within the 25-foot setback from wetlands on the
south side. This encroachment can probably be accommodated if the developer
provides an exotic, nuisance vegetation control and maintenance plan for the
balance of the wetland area, which is highly impacted. The upland and vegetated
wetland areas have accreted as a result of acquiescent area created on the inside
corner of two seawalls;
Response:
Comment:
The existing wetlands are disturbed. Exotic species and nuisance vegetation will be
removed and replaced with natural wetland plants acceptable to the City and SWFWMD.
Trash and accumulated debris will also be removed.
c) The SWFWMD requires that the developer provide treatment for the difference
between pre and post development to OFW requirements (3/4 inch); however will
allow that treatment to occur in a vault as proposed;
Response:
Comment:
Okay.
d) City does not allow vaults for stormwater treatment. Much of the stormwater that is
proposed to be treated is from roof runoff; the balance being from driveway and
several parking spaces. However, the two parking levels will be washed down
periodically and that water will enter floor drains and subsequently the storm
system. As a compromise I suggested that he consider routing the roof drains
through the proposed vault which will apparently have a fIltration system and easy
access and treat the vehicular areas in an open system or in a system that
incorporates replaceable filters that remove sediment, oils, greases as well as
associated metals. Barry indicated that if we could agree to allow the roof drains to
be treated through the vault that he would propose an alternate system for the
vehicular areas including the two parking levels. Stormwater vaults are not
acceptable for water quality treatment; need solution for vehicular use area to get
out suspended solids, oil and grease, etc.; could put roof drains through vault;
.
.
IV1r. Mark T. Parry
July 25, 2002
Page 21
Response:
Roof drains and surface water from the site will be directed in a "standard" stormwater
vault. Floor drains from the two parking levels will be directed into a commercial
oil/water separator. The plans have been revised accordingly.
Comment:
e) There are disturbed wetlands here;
Response:
Agreed.
Comment:
f) Need to delineate wetland line on the plans (all sheets) so they are legible;
Response:
Okay - See revised plans.
Comment:
g) All of the above (11 a -f) to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15, 2002
DRC.
Response:
Okay.
e look forward to the final affirmative staff report and the Development Review Committee Meeting
on st 15, 2002.
~"~
~
Barry M. Bywalec, P.E.
Director of Engineering
:es
L:\parry-12.doc
Enc!.
:cc Tom Cavanaugh, P .A.C. Land Development
Robert Pergolozzi, AICP
Gerald Koi, Morris Architects
John Lesniak, Anderson & Lesniak
File 997-190.10.06
,:, !j'liilliijiil ~Iiji~
I. I ~ ~IIII~ I n~
I.~II. IU'.. _I ~II
,< .Ii.1I 'ill'l II II
illi!1 hlil, !.11I11
~::: II ~;I ~IU : I'I~ ! I
;. ! !!Ii I!;! I 1,1 III
~ 115 IIi! IIi bl
Ill! I,", 'II
IIi:1! II
I ~ ; i I
.
IUI
2~~
~8~
~
*, \~
~ II ...-<:J
· III ~ ~
~ i~ ~
.~L, ~
1:,~
(~
~
~
't,
~\
~\
~~
~~
---1 \J
'\
--.J \
I
I
i1latl..!.....=". II
11111I111111lll! I
i 1!1'!II'li11illll
I I I II
.y...~-:: ~
111111 '1~'1 ~"3i 3i3i3i "";II
~J~~~~~:;:=="::
PjjjjB!!!~h:1 -;
J... I"'IH- :t
. :~nuqi!pt!: ~
r i : i ~ I
l>
I
~
..;~ ~...... ,
rf'l I .Jt ~
i '- lIP, IP111 ~ I ~
II" ~1'~111!i I .: ~ 1.1
;~<l~ql~ L II I ~
~ ~ !!I!I III ~I J ~ I riB IIIJ
~~I I; bl ~..~ I'I r g I
Ill; ~c! 'I !R. , ~ _ I~II
~ ii.~ 1~lilliJ r i ~
as .Id iPPJ/~ L_~ 'il
\:)IJ' HII hr III II
I II~
.
-fiLE
CASE #:.B.E2. loot-ooOr 7
DATE RECEIVED: _ 6.:J..!Z:~,= ____
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ~____
ATLASPAGE#: .1...u!2.
ZONING DISTRICT: ___~__________
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ~.klS--
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPEEiTIES:
NORTH: I;> C-l> ~
SOUTH: ~ 1
WEST: ..(..M"..... H-vl,q....r
rwater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle A venue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded she plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 7/16/01)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- use additional sheets as necessary
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
P "A r. T.;=mn Dpvplnpmpnf- ('nrpnrrif-;nn
MAILING ADDRESS: 730 Bonnie Brae Street, Winter Park, FL 32789
tlc@paf?landdevelopment.com(.407).6.28_306.5
E-MAIL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: ..
CELl NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
(407) 645-0112
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
670 Island
J.J. Dan Mar Inc. Attn: Dan Gleichowski
AGENT NAME(S):
(Must include ALL owners)
Way. Suite 600, Clearwater, FL 33767
Tom Cavanaugh, P.A.C. Land Development
Corporation
MAILING ADDRESS: 730 Bonnie Brae Street, Winter Park, FL 32789
tlc@paclanddevelopment.com(..407)..628_3065 f..!
E-MAIL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: 07. 7{, '). 0 0) -CL(.,
CELL NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
(407). 645-0112
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 700 N. Osceola Avenue
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
See At:tached
(if not listed here, ~Iease note the location of this document in the submittal)
9/29/15/00000/420/0400
PARCEL NUMBER:
PARCEL SIZE:
1.11 upland acres
(acres, square feet)
28 Condominium Units
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE;
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRJPT\ONOFRE . Com rehensive Infill for building height exceeding
'"\ r" (7J rs n \,f1 r~clu ecr uested code deViations; e.g reduction in required number of parking spaces, speCific use, elc) 50 ft.
1 I 1 :\ l,
l ,"-~ _. ..pagEl" 1 ~f~"' Fleldl1~, , elcfPment Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of ClealWaler
1 fl. i ~,ii \1 b rry _p~"
I .,; J1u' '.,' I 2 0 :'..:.Ti2 "i i I' 1)4
! ' i 'j __v I, i) : I
'I.. 'J \,.1 . . ______.,._._...V..-j ,
'"..,nr"" ,',C ".~:/'~~
PU,.\., ) 0'l1..,,'V
Ci .. """..,'~i;;
.
.
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOlVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,
OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO -1L (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
itl SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TIllE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located.
The :groposed proj ect will meet all requ; n~menr of rnp nov.rnrown (n)
zoning district.
It is in an area of small lots -s-enerally almost
fully covered by building/parking.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
Adiacent properties are presently developed with IDulti-famjly uses.
The redevelopment of the site to include upscale condominiums would
improve th~ ~~mmunity appearance and may even encourage redevelopment
of neiqhborinq properties. '.. .
3. The prop6sed develop~nt'will no't adversely affect the health or safety or persons reSiding or working In the neighborhood of the proposed
use. .
The redevelopment of this slte to an upscale condominium will not
adversely affect health or safety of neighborhood residents;
4A Th~ proposed developm~nt is designed to minimize traffic congestiQna 1
,Ll:S unlt conoomlnlum proJect WOUl. generate on y 164 daily trips,
12 dur; ng rnp AM ppr:lk nOllf 15 dllrin'J the PM peak hOllX _ This amount
is minimal.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The community is composed of multi-family developments at high
densities~he proposed developrnpnr ;s ~on~i~rpnr wirn n~nsjri~s ~
the NW Expansion Area of the Periphery Plan/ and recent development approval
6. The design of tfie proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operatton impacts,
on aDiac~n1 pcoperties. . .
The 15ull.Olng wlll be setback from the Shorellne of Clearwater Bay so
as to not hinder views from adjoining properties.
~ Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMf'REI-ENSM: NFLL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTCRITERIA (as applicable):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use,
intensity and development standards.
The deviation from aeove 50' in height is necessary to place
~king underneath H1P I'm; 1 <'l; n~lDz.in'J fl oars SincE' th
~urface parkinq~virtuall~impossible. The increased height
for improved site design/landscapinq.
Page 3 of 6 a Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project'! City of Clearwater
,..-
.
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements. )
According to Pinellas Coun~ropeLY~raiser the assessed value
of the existing property is $4n7,8QO, th~licant estimates improved
value of $6 Million. This improvement is expected to improve values in the
ne1gll.lJOrnooa.
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
Condominiums (attached dwellings) are a permitted use within the
.
Downtown CDt zone in Clearwater.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
The underlying land use designation is CBD per the Future Land Use PI n,
which permits 25 units per acre and current zoning permits attached
dwellings. Development in the area consist of older 2-story multi-fam ly
uses and recently approved proJects 1ncl.ude mul.t1 story condom1n1ums.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otheswise availal:>le in the City of Clearwater.
Land. use 1n the NW Expansion Area are diverse. Multi-family comprises
only 13.83% of land area in the NW Expansion Area per the plan. Suital Ie
sites for redevelopment are not readily avai]anle_
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
Tt-.. o.f the parcel j:lroposed fO( development. t' 7
He eX1S-t1ng aevelopmen 1S older apartment units originally built
in 1946. Redevelopmero:b of t:np propprt-y wl't-n l1p~r.;:llP r.onrlom;n;l1m~ wonl
upqrade__the immediate neightborhood, increase the property value, and overaJ
appearance
7. The design of th~'proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character
of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
'T'ne T\lW F.ypansion Area DOvTntown Periphary Plan encourages upscale re.si< entiaJ
redevelopment. The plan states "The area should be redeveloped with M Iti-
Family townhomes and condominiums. New single-family is the least app opriat
use here". The proposal is consistant with redevelopment goals and wi 1
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the eI hance
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. th e comr uni ty .
The increase in height will allow for increased opportunities for
landscaping, amenities and improved site design. This will enhance
community character.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
The site plan provides for adequate on-site parking~
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary. The design wi 11 comply with the guidelines of the
Downt:own Di!=:t:rir.t- <'Inn polir.ip~ of t-np NW F.xp;:ln~;on ;z\.rpi'l ppr;pnpry Plan.
Page 4 of 6 a Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projecta City of Clearwater
.
.
Page 5 of 6 a Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projecta City of Clearwater
.
.
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
)Q SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including dimensions of property) - One original and 12 copies;
. 0 COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required;
181 LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPER1Y;
~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
]lI GRADING PLAN, as applicable
Xx
X
X
--X
x
I}Za
X
-X
I}Za
)Q
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
EI SITE PLAN with the following infonnation (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
X- All dimensions;
~ North arrow;
L Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
~ Location map;
~ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
X Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
X- Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
X- All required setbacks;
X- All existing and proposed points of access;
X- All required sight triangles;
L Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, stonn and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and enclosures (minimum 12'x10' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
Location of all onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks
L
X
X
x
X
X
X-
X
X
L
L
f
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenltabular fonn:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units and PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular fonn with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular
area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impenneable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses
REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11) and color rendering if possible
a
X
-X
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE I>CRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
~
X
X
X
X-
X
~" "t'~"
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projed- City of Clearwater
-X
~A
~
Xl
'gA
o
-X
~
--X
--X
x
-X
I.
~
Xl
.
.
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
~
X
-X
-X
-X
---X
~
-X
:....x
_2);
X
lANDSCAPE PlAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, sal mixes, backfilling, mulching
and protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet
and percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible)
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications)
o
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
o
Copy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOIflHWEST FLORIDA WATER MlWAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMmAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o
COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
BUIlDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required
J. SIGNAGE: (Section 4-202.A.16)
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required)
o Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application
Page 8 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
N / A 0 Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive
Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to
Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
Page 9 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Inlill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
l. SIGNATURE:
.
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
~/ 2
S~MI"re of pro- ~ 0' re".,.~ (~ U 4'lAll> If-
.
ANGIr
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OFPINELL.acs(::;f:( .
Sworn to and subscribed before me this /i.i!!!- day
IY\,Q Y A.D. 20.02: to me and/or
, who is personally knowl)
of
by
has
as
produced
identification.
tAYr1/11/L ~. bnJ-Wu
Notary public,
My commission expires:
DONNA 1. BUTLER
My Comm Exp. 12/28103
No. CC 898594
Pe<sOf1.lly Known [J Other 1.0.
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
Dan Gleichowski
JJ Dan Mar, Inc.
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record tille holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
700 North.Osceola Avenue
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Compr~hensive.lnfill R,edevelopment for 28 condominium units.
3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint Tom ..Callanauqh
P.A.C. Land Development Corporation.
as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. Tho' (1Iwe).... ....~- .-. hereby oe<tify ...,... -. '4:;;"/ ~ L/ ~_
-Property Owne~ . '
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNlY OF PINELLAS
14TH
who having been first d .
i S Pe..-rS6v~.
My Commission Expires:
~- EdIthA SterfIng
. . My ComrnIssial DOO75Q95
, ~ --.IenueIy 23, 2006
S.'IPIanning DepartmenMpplication FormS\deveIopment revi-v!exible development application.doc
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
W
I 0:
I- W Cl
Cll-I- Zw
ZU<(",OZ
O<(~I'-.J-
...10:0: <(...I
<(1-<(i:I-I
I-LL~O:~~
(/}OUO~O
WO:LLZ Z
~WOZ(/}W
Z ::>W
1-0: (/}O:Wi:
~8~w~~
LL I-UWO
O~<(CjO~
O<(~II<)-
,,;wwl--b
I!) I I ..IO
N~I-~~W
ZOOWO>
~(/}I-LL(/}g
O~I-~~<(<i
ZI-W O:WO
<( WI!) Za:
I-~:=I'-~:JO
W-(/}I-Z ...I
WW (/}WI-LL
o:lDW<(I(/) .
I- .ClWI-!;>-
(/}ClO LLI-
~a:(/)': Z
WZOW<(W::>
ClZ.JWlDIO
O(3WO: I-U
a:W Clo:
~lD~~~i:~
WLLW~<(~j
OOZ ~ W
ZI-:JI~~~
<(~I~Wi=o..
WOI-O.JU .
::>o..O:ZUWI-
Z 0 (/}(/)
~<(Z~~~;5
<(g~o:(/)~~
ZLLOOO:-
o .JZWWW
~~<(<(~I~
~Z(/}I-~I-<(
<(~(/}U 00:
I<(~~~I-I
1-<( I-I-(/}I-
O:.Jg(/}O(/}::>
00 -I-WO
LLWWi: ...I(/)
LLUo: (/}o:'"
O(/}OLL(/}ON
O:::!:OW
W .JWo..
Z~I-O:o:O:J:
:J WWOO(/)
WWZ :::!:Z
I-ZLLO:W ~
(/)- 00:1-0
W.Jguo~1-
~I- 'I-:::!:LL .
(/}'-"(/) '"
WWN<(I-O
i:~I<)WWOZ
I- IW '0
LLO(/}I-LL~i=
Ol-W::>O-U
I-~~O>-W
~WZ o<((/)
-W::>9NlDZ
00:0:<(1<)0:-
w~w(/}I-W~
<fl UI-(/}I--
O:WZ<(W<(W
WClw ~~lD
I-OIZ o:~
~a:I--(/}<(1-
o ~www
W.Jo<(I-.Jw
IwW ::>uo:
I- >-wZ I-
LLWU~LL(/}
~o>z Ow
WZWOO:Cl
WzO:::!:I<)Wo
U:JU:::!:(/}I-a:
...I Z >-ow<(o
W WIlDUW~.J
U :::!:I-W.o: W
0: :::!:O:OC>-ClW
<( OOW<(WILL
a.. UZIcnOI-O
.
l-
(/)
<(
W
'dl-~
~z(/}w
-zWCl
~~~z
(3U(/)<(
W wO:
lDWI- .
I::>I
LLI-ZI-
oLL~6
I-ON(/)
~wl!)",
~9(/}N
<((/}~9:,
1-0: I
o:(/)Cl(/}
O<(WZ
LLWO~
~>-W!:::~
W<(I
~lDl-i:cri
ZO:Cl::>Z
~~~~Q
<(...I I-
W~<(~~
::>O:WZ<fl
Z<((/}W
~~O:I<i
<(U61-9
<(LLU::ig
...10>-0:...1
o .J<(LL
~~OC:::!: .
(/}<(~o:~
O:::!:I-~Z
LLo:g<(6
O~Z~U
W<(<(I(/)
~~ Cl<(
...I ZJ:.J
I- ...I
I-ClWWW
(/}J:UClZ
~WCj~a:
Cl I W .
W<(I->O:ui
i:~ -<(~(/)
>>-W<(W
O<(~I~.J
Z 1-0:0:
<(Wo: <(0
IWOW
~I-I-I-(j~
ZO<(I- 0
~I-~W~:::!:
<(I-<(~Cl(/)
WW ZW
WW.JO-o:
ClLLUOWU
9 ZOlD<(
~g-~~--: .
...I ....1-<("'0
w~~1- ClO:
LLl<)z(/}ClzO
o <(<(Z_U
WIW>=~w
w::>u ...1<(0:
~CjW~o\iiLL
.J>IZZOO
I<(I-~<(6?(/)
~Wol-c;~~
Ogl-:f~LLW
Za:I-I-~LL~
WowO:-o(/}
I.JwoCl <(
I-WLLZ~~W
LLLLOW <(...I
OOO::>LLI-.J
.00 <(
zwo (/)
OZ"''''I- '0
i=:JQq~~z
I'-UIl-g~.J<(
NWI-(/)- ...1>-
(/}o:w oWz
o:O:O~LLI-~<(
wWz 0 a..
lD~ Zwl- 0
~_W::>UWLLI-
N::> Io:zwO
...I Z~l-w<(LL>-1-
wI- ClUI-Ol-u
U U::2:ZZ~OZ~
~ ~ ~~~o";6 ~
o..I-LL<(I-<(~U(/)
...I
<(
::>
o
5>
o
Z
d...:<i
wz(/}9
ClZ<(O:
O<(wO
-I ...I
O:UWLL
~ U.
WWZo:
IWW
LLI-II-
001-<(
WI-I~
~I-I-<(
.JWO:W
WO.J
i:LLZU
:30~~
ZqOCl
Cl~I-~
ZOWW
O-WlD
;;i...:LLo
(/}"'Z
I-Wo<(
(/}~OCl
~w~~
U >-
ZZLL.J
::>WO
O:IwC;
.1- U~
wzzz
>::><(~
<(o:I-Cl
(/}w
<(C;OlD
6~<(LL
wZ 0
u~.J
(/}Clwl-
OWZZ
lDZO
LL <(a..
OLLI
OUw
~I-LLi:
-zo
...I - -
.~w~~
~ 0 _
winl-O:
OI 0
ZI-I-~.J
<( (/}LLLL
0: <( .
uiowo>-
>LL 01-
W .z
<(>-II<)::>
<(I-~O
WlD U
Cl Cl C
90:Z~(/)
o:woru<(
~~;;ijQj
w~win~
LL~(/}Wa:
owg;~ .
w(jowl-
~ UI~
.J~>-I-w
. ...1-
z~~~~
WI-I<(w
i:<(I-:::!:Cl
~o: Z
00:<(
~i3z~o:
ZJ:<(<(I
o z~1-
-w_ ::>
I-Cl IO
U<(WCl(/}
WO:UJ:
(/}WZ '"
O:>WWN
W<(ICl
~ 1-<(9:,
_ 0 ..0: I
I->-W(/)
Z <(>Z
<(l-lD<(~
:::!:~0:0~
OLLWI-
0: I-
LLO<(I-'"
.O~WZ
I'-wo:Wo
NN<(LL_
I'1W l-
I- ...IOU
U 'UOw
~~LLO(/)
I-<(O~~
I-
Z
W
:::!:
W
(/)
<(
W
>-
<(
~
LL
o
l-
I
Cl
0:
...I
<(
Z
<(
U
I-
U
0:
I-
~
o
Z
o
I-
<(
~
>
<(
Z
o
Z
<(
...I
~u::
1-0
(/}I-
<(0:
0<(
Uo..
1-1-
(/)<(
WI
~I-
.
W
Z
...I
0:
W
I-
Z
W
U
I
U
I
~
l-
(/)
<(
W
I!)
...I
<(
Z
<(
U
>-
<(
~
0:
W
I-
<(
~
, Z
~ Q ~
::>WI- Z
j~~9~
<((/)<(
~O:~(/}I
I-II-LL~
<(I-~oo
~6WI'-(/)
<((/) I "?,,,
W l-o..N
...I'"
UNOoo..
I-z-
LL9:, <(~
OI>- Z
(/}<('-"~
~~~"?o
1-0wo..I-
Cjl-~I-cri
uu:)~Gz
~~OLLQ
1-0<(01-
oi=(/}z~
ZULLO(/)
<(~Oi=LL
...I I!)uo
<(LLI<)W
zo.:Qo:
<(o:o..w~
UWI-I-o:
>-Z::>~O
<(O:U U
~8LL~1-
0: Ol-(/)
wI- <(
l-(/}wOW
<(<(ZI-I
~w:J I-
Io:'-"::>
.JI-W I<) 0
;:g~a:.(/)
(/}zwl-~
~wu::>1-
UIwu
<(I-ILLLL
0: 1-00
I-LL
zOClwl-
-I-~~~
I-(/}.J.J~
(/}W<(o:
<(~ wI-
o I-I-w
UI-WZW
WWWLL
I-WLLU
~LL=Cl~
~ON~'-':
--:0 '-"
wcoo<(.J1!)
I",- N
I-i<j CI-o
LLop-iWZ
OZ",~<(
<(I<)
W ruCOI
~IjQl<)l-
.JI-N--=O:
O:::>zl<)o
Wo NZ
I-(/}W
Z U CI-
WI-ZWW
UWW~W
wWI",LL
ILLI-o,,,,
I-"'-::K}I!)
LLI':<(Oal
0",9zl'-
NO: I<)
Z'-"OWN
QCl~~Cl
I-z WZ
u- oIw
~~~l-lD
~1-~u)1-
I-~ol<)~
~~ua:.~
~9~~9
I-~j<(~
I-~WI!)~
<( . ~ I<) .
wa.. 1>-
ClCl 0..<(
~9"':1-~
ZOC(/}:::>OC
Z <(uw
(3)-w I-
w<( LL<(
lD~~O~
...I
<(
l-
(/)
<(
o
U
<(
0:
I-
Z
l-
(/)
<(
o
U
l-
(/)
W
~
W
I
l-
LL
o
W
Z
...I
0:
W
I-
Z
W
U
W
I
l-
LL
o
l-
(/)
W
~
o
Z
<(
l-
(/)
<(
W
W
o
in
o:~
W~
I
1-0
WI-
I-vl
W~
Wo
LL.J
0...1
q2
o
I!)(/)
N<(
ZO
J:~
1--
~5
(/)
ClW
~O
>-
.J~
r
.. I
'.y
.
This Wammty Deed
.
~ PfIIIv-.7_._
I..c:..-='~J!I- Pi *'"
AD.19" --~
r
bctc:illllfrct called dac ........ 10
J. J. ~, IDe., A ftO&'ida ~t:.i
17,.109 SIll
flt.SO
N,MS.OO
U,&51
o.OlII.!50
....
,
..... this 14th cbJ aI "Y
11)-
~ Ad-.. . DaZri-e4 _
'U of x.cord ea4 t.ze8 f~
_.~~->
;00 H. OIIceola Ave. 17
C1~. no 33755
~. .......
'--. ......
........~
n., farCFial__.. ~ !dare _ aU 14th ..., cI JIay
..,.
Gecnge A.s-, a ~ _
...... is pcnaaaIly l.- 10 _ ot ..... loa (IIDIfa<aI dJ:1 'V'C". lic:.IN
a!l idrntirlnlfil1.
~.. .
; ~-);4t1k~
~
"
.c-....."....
i' - '1 J/l'p''!S-7"
,.
. ....
Description: Pine~~as,FL Document-Book.Page 10519.2451 Page: 1 or 2
Order: gerry Comment:
.tIolc .- oI&e ..,. iI: J2,. ...~ DZ'.
Cl~~. PL 33"1
IIaciaaftcr called Ik paatce:
- c-....... _ _ tk.... -..-.- -.I -,.-- __........-..._ __ _...
~{J -.... .....---~........_ ~_..... do< -.-....... ~....-,
5.fA; WillI en II" ... doc pal.... lor .. ia mmidcnIioa af doc _ 01 S10. 00
lIIId .... ftIubIe....-..-. ~ --..r a Krchy ~ ......, IJII'Ib, II.pia. seIIs..... maiocs,
rdeasa. -... ...... ....... - doe .,-. .. tJ.I ....... .... __ .. .Uael~
("GIIIItJ'. Florida. ~
S.. S~lIedal. A attedaecl bento tm4 by th1e nfen8ce __ . pu:t
bereof.
~ 'l'O CoYeDuaU. ~U1ct:.i0D8, ...
~~~.
Sd.4 p~Lz is DOt C!Ie......~ of the Gna~(.J ~ tile ~
aad COD8t:.iba~ of tile State of nO&'14a ia tllat: _itber Ck_b)rCaJ ~
any -.ber. of tile 1IoaHIIo14 of GnatorC.J naida ~_.
f.,; ~
..
. -
~~
O. -
,......
Pucel Uaat:Uieat:ica 1IaIIbeJ:'. 0'/n/1S/oooOOJ420/CHOO
T...............--.~.-I ;oppartc&1llCD.......~..;" aayooioc~
Te lIMe ... Ie ReId. doc same ;" ree roi......~.
ADd lbe ~ ......." -..... ... 17- dullhr ...... is Iawf"" ocized III ...... ;" rce _pic;
.". dac paat.... loa pu4 rick .... ..................,. In !d -t .-...., wid 10M; .... .... pmk.-1Iacby rally ........
.... tiIIc 10 ..... ..... .....lriI *'*'.... ...., ..,a..a tJac LMfal dooita. ol .. JIDM* ~ ad ..... ..od bad ;.
fn:c Ill.. ClKIIIIII>nDo:: ~ IDe< ---. Mhw:q_la Dca:mhcr 31. 19 ,.
I. wu.a. WIILnI( tIac sat .- ~ ripcd lIIId JQ!cd dIac .......- tIac ., ..... ,... &st ~
writ1I:lI..
SigMI. ~ tIIId ~ ill DIIT pteSma:
.~~
/
---
-
St.tc '" nori4a
CUUIIIf III pf....1.1..
"'1)./
'rn
PRtI'4ItQ) ",", M.tha ""-WI
1lEC:0II0 a a:nJaN 1'0:
CattIrp 11de... .-..-. __
m......... N..
0..-. fJertdoo D7U
fOr N0r:36,.CD7
", i
. .:.'1
~'" ..'-~..,,"-"
>://.t,\'~'~ .
I: I~ ~~:< .
!: :1 i~i~~~',
flSl
rw
rw
rw
. JI] " .
I
,
~
.
i
_A
1
~
~
~
~
f
~
o
,"
~
2
- - .
. .. u'; ,".'
;:f~- :.:~;:d.;'! !:j:~:! ': i~l
:~...~ ...... .;....:.0#
! .., ,,~, -0-:0..
.
.
~
r
or:l~ ~
.~.- 'Olt,.,.,,~
Scbeda1. &
C'........ce at: tJua J.at:eneet:iaD of t:IIe ...t: li1la of J'ort IrurUoa
&- u4 IU4r1dge ftnet ad nil 253 feet: "'t: aloag IIonh
11M of Blclridge St:net: to West: 1~ of OIIceola &....... for a
paillt of bev1lal&iDg, beiIIg tile SoIItlleut: conau of tJae 'rraet:
boInby _"6J'~' '113ace. nD...t 326 feet -.on or I... aloag
IIoriJI lUe of Blclriclge Stnet: to tile ..~ of C1au:watar Bay.
C~ 8981Ia at ni4 s-u....t ~ of W. tract aDd ZUD
RortJl15- But 15.1/2 feet, t:!ImIee. Z'aR Jroftb 7.-30- ...t 320
f____ or 1eQ to tU _ten of C1~ Bay, tII8Dce ZUD
Soutla 13- "'t aloag tile _ten of c::l.eu1Iatc Bay 153 feet lIOZ'e
~ 1ta to tJae JatenecUaa ritla tile fint 1... ___ de!iaed
(tba IIortJa liAe of Bldd4ge Itnet) beiag Ja SecUoD t. or--Plfp
29 lIolItI&, ...... 15 "'t, UIc:l1ldi.asJ al1 1DtenR JIe1d Iry ..E.
llip.ll .... dee4 fna tile Iatealal -.... en hDcI ...--U-S
.. follows.
ftICf ~ 27. Wltaa - JatenecUoa of tile IIOrth lu. of
K1dridge A..... ad tJua ...t 11_ of CMc.o1a AwDae. AD ...t
a1aar tile Irac1:Ia liDe of K1*idge AYeIIIIe 321 feet to t:IIe .~
bjp atelr MD of Cleana~ Bay ~ a poiDt of ....40.......,.
ftace. AD...t 1. Of 0 feet to tile ..h__1 14 ~tec Bay,
tIIeDce 14 . JIoztJIm-ly COUZN a10Dsr tJIe ...t 8SU of tile ..h__At
a cIir'~~ of 111.09 dae ~ ~...t 1.1t. feet: to tile
.......hiP _CC..o:, tIIeDee S-tIa 17-52- "'t In feet to
poiat of~. CoatUa1Dsr..l ecru __ or 1_. ad
lyiag u4 aillg 14 C1euwa~, l)iael1aa CoaDty. J'lorida. ill
t'owuIaip 2t 801ItIa, ..... 15 "'t. ComIty of MDe1~. State of
Plodda.
J'U.llcu 36.407
,
)
~
i
,--;. ~m!~11 n'!I!II~"'" ....,
f .' :/ : ,i ':i '- : ~;_~._. .
..!. ..' '. . .....j :1 :.!~.;i:_,:'.:,','~..:.:i:
:~,,;J;:~> ...\:;.~:_;..! "'J:.,: .~~:.- .",.. '.""F-:."
;;~::);.'; .'
00'
,J
1
". -.... .'::'~""-...;...-
'..' '. -,-. . ....... '::- .......-- . ...;
::[":r:l,r'f:;~r-~~~~,~rM;""'~";~;~ ,'~ ,i. i"
.:'-.1" '
.\~::;:.:'1 .
,:a.-,- ,,'.
~~:rif.,:
Description: Pine~~as,FL Document-Book.Page 10519.2451 Page:. 2 of 2
Order: gerry Comment:
.
\
\
\
\
\
)~
';$1','1$ lI!lleas(J
w
:I
...
:>
.i2
'"
'"
u
.
<.> <.>
&.&
E E
88
I
,
+ ~ S
~JI~i 0'
~ ~ ~~ a~' !~.I!
-- .. ~ <::1
llUU.....S~~
:::':J::j-u;, ~
,
i::1
~ ;gl ~
=: ~1~
o O!_
"o....c[ 0
:>-.cl "'0
).- ~">; ~
~ 0..,1 co
{'>~ "Ol:t"l ('~
i
I
!
I
I
i
:el
:::J
-
Z
-
:E
o
Q
:z
81
:!:.
ILl
~
m
~
,.".
~
;:
a..
~
G) .
-u
(.).
<B:
0:
<;>
~ C\I
+ 0
@J 0
0; C\I
a; ~
... .....
c CD
0-':
"- W
"W"'" tI}
-
- u
<D cv
:> :!::
s:;
(D (,,)
~ ...
<{
C'-.J
...~
t-~
C"-I
'I~.=:-,
........
.
.
\
\
\
\,
\
\
\
)..,
_ M
,~ -- +
~^Y 1I10<l:JSO -'
w
...
'"
E
c
'"
w
N
:E
:;)
........
Z
........
:i
o
a
:z
o
(,)
==
w
........
>
~
m
i m ~
'1:$e-
~,- a
SO
iii: :>
1 z.. Q,>
sa
('IS "a
== C
.... m
m....ll
CD .
-u
u .
<lC
a:
~
C)
C)
~
~
,-
(0
U')
-
U
<D
-
:.c
t.)
!l...
<
.
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ENGINEERS, ENVlRONMENTAUSTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS
MEMO
Date:
August 9, 2002
~-."'."~'"'.'..-""..~. -"-'-.'-
re (.;,., r ,c. ,] '\\i! It::: 1
o L!; S l;~! .W ll; I n i~
IUU~UG ~;~ IWI
, " , __.__,__.J ,
P. f""Nlr.,)r::. '''Ji>'.;:'J. U''',";,'':\-'''\. (.\"<1
L.J"'.t.. ..... \.1 ~... -_ 't ,_. ..'1 'l, ~ ~ 'oJ'" t
elr (OF Ct EiiPI,IVi\~Q1.._!
To:
Lisa Fierce
Mark Parry
From:
Barry M. Bywalec, PE
Re: Bayview Condominium - 700 North Osceola Avenue
Application for Flexible Development
Case Number FLD-2002-06017
Enclosed please find a copy of the deed from the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund
of the State of Florida (T.I.I.F.) for the portion of the above referenced property from the
"average high water mark. .. to the channel in Clearwater Harbor."
This is being provided to you for your review as we discussed by telephone (or voice mail)
earlier this week.
If you have any questions or need any additional information prior to the DRC meeting on
Thursday, August 15, 2002 please contact me at any time.
Thank you.
M:\Bayview Condominiums.doc
Enc!.
cc: Tom Cavanaugh
Ed Mazur, Jr., PE
Robert Pergolizzi, AICP
File 997-190.10.06
FILE
1U}~(lJ'l-- ffio 0
(
1..
I APR. 2.2002
5:52PM _
.
NO. 929
P.2/3
'..;!j\ &. t ~ .I '~.i .~,.. . ~ I..
. .... ,11.: 1:. .... q...... I '!J't1:~ "'.
. .. :....-.~~,..: . . .':.,.. '.' : ..:.: .~.... . i.:' .;~ " . WIO .....:~;..
. ll'''f''',\ ,. '" ..,. ''OJ' . "'_'1 '.1"'" ." ':If : .,,1'1:, ".:I , .... ..J ... ','. .~.
,. \ "'=' .. ',* :':\"'. '.\ ..~ 'V",:,:~ "'~1' . .j" 1'1' ~ ~1\ . .....,..~
:.':l....~.~ ~~'.:' ," ~.~ .:.>~.,. . 'J~; : i~~J:"'.hl: m~'~ .~. . ~.:ll"::~~U ,.... : ~'~t:. . ~ .' ,.~
. ">~~(~,'" ~~I~'" 1':~fU~i::~~~i'.41/I.'~~.:~~~~"~~i;L .:'.': ...~.
. " ..,.. :......').. ,.' ,; ')i!',.~..... i"~""" .. .,~.~~"J~ ~ ...". '.,
J)m'iIQ.. H -6~~t~..: '. . . .. ';~. :'~... >~'~. . . -.' .'. . ~ .' . '., ':,Ii
'-:'''.W'~ '. "':.~~~'~~V.~;""" '. '~~S~.~~:.~~~~I':I",~\:', .i'~'~,i'!i?~(li. ,JI;;'ll'I~'7 ~ ~~::.": .~-;
Dtil~~~~;ilW":tRi'~;."""" t~~~""'~'.' ~~Wt.li.~..~.;~.
..!~~ . .~ . . J.)!liAt.>t. ~r.-~~~...a:.
the frute.. Of-..t&,' :~~'.~1"i~jjl6~\tf.t ~:'Ii'\ib4 0": L-"8t~~i!'d~':':
FlorUa, ~.r{,'uci' ~i:'Ylrb. ot6t. ...":~~rl'tl f)f ~'o'Uon 1051
of lb. 1,.,1..4 cst"~al ;,-*u.... ot.i,.iitia.;" ant "~~r4l~ 'h 'be
~roYl.l~n. aa4 pr~.e4ur. 'prov14.4 rO~'l~'Y.O'loa 106. of 'he
"'Ylle4 O4ln.ral ".'U"I 0 t '10l'l14&, .:a4 t'~r UI4 ill 0 ou14.rauoA
vi the 8Wll of Four Huntre4 rea aM 00/100 4011ar. ("10.00). h
. ,
'b.. in buA Ptl14 b7 1.1. I(1p.11 of n.A.l1.. Oou'" noli.....
reoelp' of Wbloh 1. he~b7 .otD~1'~4. haY. <<ran,.A, barl&lnea,
.01d .~ oon""ed to the lald R.I. Kighell and hl. h.lrs &D4
..I1!D', torever, tho.. oerh,,I,.Ol .u..rg'4 lILn4., 4.lodbe4 a.
tol!ow., 'o-.ltr
!~f ." 'rom an lnber..ation ot lurth 11n. or 114r1dg.
IV'DU' and -eftt l1n. ot 0'0'01. A'Y.nu.. run W.., .lone
Jor'b line of 114rltS' Annu. au rut toavlr&Be hlgh
.a'.r In Ol..rwater 8&1 '0 poln' of b,slnnlng.
'rh'DO' Wut lO~O tee t to ohaMtl 1n Cl.....a hI' Bal.
theno. ln a Northerly GOur.. aloA<< &&"' ~14e or oh&nnel
a dlatanoe of 160.09 te.' due Nor'h.
Theno. la~' 1140 teet to aYera~e hl~h wal.rmart,
Thenol 30uth 17 de~r618 62' W..t 16a teet to polnt ot
'o1~lnnl~,
Contllln1np, "'.1 o.oreH, 1I10re or leRU, nnd 111"\~ aM bellltl':
ln Clearwater, ?lorlda. ln TownKhlp 29 louth, Ru~. 10
East. Count1 or Plnella_. State ot Florlda.
TO H.Ulo: AND TO nOLD the "u1<<1 Ilb:)ve ment10nec lone. uu.orl br:d
\!
"I
c-
O
o
1~ i
rl
.
l..n(1 ont:. r.rer..l"u, and ..11 the Hcle an' lntere','. or the Trullt...
there1n K~ ~ranteQ to them b7 1e:t10n 1061 or the ~evl".4 o.n.ra1
5tatut'H ot florlda, unto the H.14 N.E, l1~hell and h1" h.1rl ~n4
a~.l"n. forevor.
~~';lnl."DJt'VIlO"'Ufo' ;\bi',,,d.,'iI '.r "b. -.la" r nal
j.,,-i.pr,Onllea; -P\1A4-ol. '101'1&11, AIl4 tbe 11' "ul~ae8"Ol"ll,'-U 'Ud1 vlU4
jl(;;:' "". .
.'bl'....toul'~h. 1"*'''' ," lD anA HU, in aACl to &A un41vlcled.,'hree.
.-h:";, ......
tour'h. iDhrut 1n all the pho.phLih, m1nerflla aDd 1II.0t.l.' tbat
I.
. .
',90;,
"
~ i.I.. I
-1..
I
,.
I
(t'
,
I
.I..J. ."\
. . \' ..."
'. I
! : ,APR. 2.2m::2 5: 53PM
. NO. 929
:-
-\
P.3/3
PB 40 I /44-t.
~ ,.,
-.-.'(:'
~",.
. c;.Or unt.1' 'M .a1d abon duor1 '0.4. land 8 I
. to'.":
1<~"..~lalwt SG~n'" ia 'ud title 1n and to an
. .,".
. ....:.~;~ahJ'..' 1D all the p, 'rol.u 'ba' 1& or
aboy. d'l4r1bed land, w1th the
o rld' "&A4 tndo)) 'he .....
. ,. ,J.
't
_. ....F WI'l'IE'S wm:EfOF, T,he Trushu ot the
+ IDterllo.l lrr.pl"oyer',ent Fund ot the State ot
.. ..
. '. .,'\
Flor14a hav& hereunto ~b8crlb~~ the1r n~,e.
and. at!1xed tbelr nul'f I und hQve OIlU'led. the
. ,
. i
i
j
".al or TKE D.&:?ARTV~NT OF .\GRICU~. tr-'j;; 0:' !'!r..;
.
, ,
S'l'A'L'E or FLORID4, '0 :Hl nereunto aHi xetl, " t
eh., Cupl.tol. 1n ,~. CltJ of 1'&.11 hu:.aeo;;, on
tbh, th.e . 'h db1 ot hnuar.v .~.D. 192b.
GJ..-d:. >r)'I~~(3=)
ernol'. I
In,u,)
om
,- -------f)-;;..IU..~-' .~~~~~-~ /
( -~- .' -
'- -- - ,. ~'-<
;.... ~'. I
"--rl.Ti't,fe;-'?'ene I'll i. ~ ..- . ~
( n:AL)
I <3;',AL)
~ ()~ALI
forr.r ;~~1 r,n.' ")( '\~"'r(~u 'ture7--
nLIDf.~.!:t:..~..Af.I..~:.-?1.o' CLOOK .(.1.;' If
AD IIOOImID tw !II BOOJ NOTle 4 BOn.
I. I. O'QIJDli, 01erk 01rCI.l1t Oourt.
PiaeUalI Qomtty, J'lor14e
l
t
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ENGfNEERS, ENVlRONMENTAUSTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS
MEMO
To:
Terry Finch
Mark Parry
From:
Barry M. Bywalec, PE
Date:
August 12, 2002
Re:
Bayview Condominium - 700 North Osceola Avenue
Application for Flexible Development
Case Number FLD-2002-06017
Enclosed please find a copy of our record of the on-site meeting with Rick Perry of the
Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) on August 9, 2002. The District
has accepted the wetland jurisdictional line as established in the field. This line is shown on
the plans presently being reviewed by the Development Review Committee.
This record of meeting is being submitted for your information.
If you have any questions or need any additional information prior to the DRC meeting on
Thursday, August 15, 2002 please contact me at any time.
Thank you.
M:\finch.doc
cc: Tom Cavanaugh
Ed Mazur, Jr., PE
Robert Pergolizzi, AICP
Jay Hunting
997-190.10.06
997-190.30.04
m) ["::::> ,.... ..~:--.,.,...
D. ..' r:o I t: l t; '.1' \...1.... ,/,.: . r;-.-..-.,
.~ t).' ~ f! ';.' ',',c,~
,-"".:.....". .~ t' ,I; I'"
(} . -----..~~..;.~.:
I I '''....,
1 'J ~-
"
1')\
, ,
If r
pi.
L; "
, ."",'~;'~:.'
,
"j
-
.
r
RECORD OF MEETING
PROJECT Bayview Condominiums
FILE# 997-190.30.04
DATE August 9, 2002
TIME 10:00 am
LOCATION On-site
ATTENDEES
NAME
Rick Perry
Jay Hunting
COMPANY
SWFWMD
FDC
NAME
COMPANY
AUTHOR
Jay Hunting
PURPOSE OF MEETING: Field review of SWFWMD wetland line
SUMMARY OF MEETING:
Location of the wetland line established by FDC was reviewed and the location accepted by
SWFWMD.
cc: Tom Cavanaugh PAC Land Development
Barry Bywalec FDC
Jon Burr FDC
File 997-190.30.04
1
.
FILE
lYe> z~z-doI7
,.......,......--"'"---~._._--,~.." "T"-- . ,...."."..-".
if ii \i/IT~ i
.,n_"",', ",~-,~.,-".,~,....:...." ,..: ,-' G I
Ii
.-~
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS
July 10, 2002
r'!
i'
Mr. Mark T. Parry, Planner
City of Clearwater
Planning and Development Services
City Municipal Services Building
100 S, Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: Bayview Condominium
Application for Flexible Development
Case Number FLD-2002-06017
Dear Mr. Parry:
We are in receipt of a copy of your letter dated June 25, 2002 to Mr. Tom Cavanaugh regarding the
above reference project. Your letter indicated that certain items and data needed to be submitted or
clarified prior to the Development Review Committee meeting on Thursday, July 11, 2002. Our
responses to these issues are presented below in the order in which they were presented.
Issue 1:
Response:
Issue 2:
Response:
Issue 3:
Clarify the ISR as shown on the cover sheet. The ISR shown is 69,844 square feet
where the site is only 48,352 square feet.
The areas used to calculate the impervious surface ratio have been revised. Three (3)
copies of the revised cover sheet are enclosed for your review.
Clarify whether fencing and/or walls will be located on the site. If so, details,
including height, materials and colors, will be required.
The. developer is proposing to remove and replace the existing dilapidated chain link
fence along the north property line with a new, 6-foot high chain link fence. No other
special fencing or walls are proposed to be located on the site. .
The cover sheet indicates that five spaces will be located within the right-of-way
along Eldridge Street. Only three spaces are evident. Spaces that are located within
or that back out into a right-of-way are not legal spaces and will not be considered
as part of your required parking.
2639 McCORMICK DRIVE' CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759
Tel: (727) 724-8422 · Fax: (727) 724-8606
.--
.......
Mr. MarkT. Parry, Planner
July 10,2002
Page 2
Response:
Issue 4:
Response:
Issue 5:
Response:
Issue 6:
Response:.
Issue 7:
Response:
Only three (3) parking spaces are proposed adjacent to the right-of-way of Eldridge
Street. These parking spaces are for the convenience of quests and are not. needed to
meet the minimum parking requirements for the project. A total of 65 cars parking
spaces and 10 motorcycle parking spaces are proposed. If the spaces in the. street cannot
be considered legal parking spaces then the total number of spaces being provided is 62.
This isa proposed parking ratio of 2.21 spaces per unit. Three (3) copies of the revised
cover sheet are enclosed for your review.
Indicate the total square footage of the proposed building.
A table is attached which includes a detailed tabulation of the proposed square footage of
the proposed building. The building square footage has also been included on the revised
cover sheet (copy attached).
Submit a full parking lot layout for all levels of parking indicating all dimensions.
Three (3) full size (24' x 36") copies of the Entry Levell and Garage Level 2 plans are
attached which clearly show the dimensions of all parking spaces. The "Entry Levell"
plan also includes a tabulation of the proposed parking. spaces. The cover sheet has also
been revised to indicate the proper number of parking spaces (copy attached).
Clarify whether individual storage spaces for the dwelling units will be provided on
site.
Each residential unit will be provided with a storage unit. Fourteen (14) storage units are
provided on each of the parking levels (Entry Level 1 and Garage Level 2). The storage
units will be approximately 4.5 feet wide by 8.0 feet deep and are shown on the Entry
Level 1 and Garage Level 2 plans (copy attached). .
It appears that l.ll acres will support 27 dwelling units at 25 units per acre (1.11
*25 = 27.75 units. The number of dwelling. units may not be rounded up.) Either
the number of dwelling units will need to be revised or the size of the site will need
to be clarified should the submitted figure of 1.11 acres be incorrect.
The size of the upland portion of the site is determined by measuring the area above the
mean high water line. The project surveyor has confirmed that the mean high water line
is ambulatory. As a natural monument,. the mean high water shoreline is a freeform line
that is constantly being reshaped by tides, currents, wave action, and storm events. An
updated survey of the present locfltionofthe mean high water line was conducted. on July
8, 2002 and confirms that the upland area of the.site is now 1.12 acres. This area is now
shown on the. cover sheet. Three revised copies of the cover sheet and the updated survey
are attached.
.
.
Bayview Condominiums Gross Floor Area by Use
(In Square Feet)
Non-Gara2:e Use Areas
Level 1- Lobby/Restrooms
Level 1- Core
Level 2- Core
Level 3- Units
Level 3- Circulation/core
Level 3- Fitness Center
Total Ll-L3
Level 4-7 Units (Ea.) 9,601
Level 4-7 Circulation/core (Ea.) 1,654
Total Level 4- 7 (11,255 x 4 levels)
Level 8- Stair
Subtotal Non-Garage Use Area
Summary of Non-Gara2:e Areas
2,171
479
479
9,601
1,776
1.289
Total Residential (Units)
Total Core/Circulation/Stair
Total Lobbv/Restrooms/Fitness Center
Subtotal Non-Garage Area
Gara2:e Use Areas
Level 1 Car parking
Level 1 Motorcycle parking
Level 1 Storage
Level 2 Car parking
Level 2 Motorcycle parking
Level 2 Storage
Level 2 Mechanical/Trash
Subtotal Garage Use Area
Summary of Gara2:e Use Area
Total Car Parking
15,795
45,020
187
61,002
48,005
9,537
3 .460
61,002
11,873
268
821
10,891
268
821
757
25,699
22,764
-
......
Bayview Condominiums Gross Floor Area by Use
(In Square Feet)
Non-Gara2e Use Areas
2,171
479
479
9,601
1,776
1,289
Level 1- Lobby/Restrooms
Level 1- Core
Level 2- Core
Level 3- Units
Level 3- Circulation/core
Level 3- Fitness Center
Total L1-L3
Level 4-7 Units (Ea.) 9,601
Level 4-7 Circulation/core (Ea.) 1,654
Total Level 4-7 (11,255 x 4 levels)
Level 8- Stair
Subtotal Non-Garage Use Area
Summary of Non-Gara2e Areas
Total Residential (Units)
Total Core/Circulation/Stair
Total Lobbv/Restrooms/Fitness Center
Subtotal Non-Garage Area
Gara2e Use Areas
Level 1 Car parking
Level 1 Motorcycle parking
Level 1 Storage
Level 2 Car parking
Level 2 Motorcycle parking
Level 2 Storage
Level 2 Mechanical/Trash
Subtotal Garage Use Area
Summary of Gara2e Use Area
Total Car Parking
Total Motorcycle Parking
15,795
45,020
187
61,002
48,005
9,537
3,460
61,002
11,873
268
821
10,891
268
821
757
25,699
22,764
536
.=---
.
!iOJJe.~~g~~~!&l~S'
MEMO
Date:
August 9, 2002
iiD) [2 -r'~:j'r~ ':'I'T;rl"'~- . .',
: ,I; I,'J 1 f: L \ V I ~! i; l
; I 0/ r-.-..,--------i! i I H
\i "'\1 h )1 ! ~
'j. I" AI" i I'll <,I
~ I ii, ,II> ~ \! il i 1
IU L\} \L~jj
[, -.-;'77'-','::;""-"-'~'i;~'":""": . ,', !
,Plt'I"I('...I":i'-';~', ". ',Ii"', { '~'.';;""~."j,'.,' '\.~ .'.
" 'f., oIi,", ','" .,: '.,' "., .. ..' "_! ",. ........~ - J
t~:~'1 ~'::'-F CI.~~/~~?,~\fA"[H .:
,- ------...
To:
Lisa Fierce
Mark Parry
From:
Barry M. Bywalec, PE
Re:
Bayview Condoll!riwlt-lI! North Osceola Avenue
Application for ~opment
Case Number FI1P-200?-M017
Enclosed please find a copy of the deed from the Trustees of the Intemallmprovement Fund
of the State of Florida (T.I.I.F.) for the portion of the above referenced property from the
"average high water mark ... to the channel in Clearwater Harbor."
This is being provided to you for your review as we discussed by telephone (or voice mail)
earlier this week.
If you have any questions or need any additional information prior to the DRC meeting on
Thursday, August 15,2002 please contact me at any time.
Thank you.
M:\Bayview Condominiwns.doc
Enc!.
cc: Tom Cavanaugh
Ed Mazur, Jr., PE
Robert Pergolizzi, AICP
File 997-190.10.06
1
APR. 2.2002
.
.
NO. 929
P.2/3
.t
\1
,...!
c-
o
cj
l~ i
r!
r
5:52PM
." "~". . ,..'11/ ',.. : ..:': ... .... . ,. ....,: .'. .'e ~~:r.
'll''''~''''\ ,:o'" ..o' .....:: ....). "'-' A.'...." :. ~i':':. , .... ..1 f"" i ,.~.
':I~~'~'/;:<' ~:l.,.~~.';: :,j:~;'i~ T*"'" ";!.;;:. '12~.t~~;:; '::'.'1:<:.,:. ',.,~~:;, : "
.... ..: "',~," ,'. .;....,,~ ...""h,...... '.,: ..~. 't~ ~.'$J ,1' .......r;....~ ,'. '.'. bf . ''''
.>~;i\:,... ..' .,~~~~oi~,,:~~:~~tAft. :. ~~~ ,.. ,....:
......, :...t.....'~.~;F'.:,'. ~~~..:t~~.~. .... ..s.~!~~~ ..,'oJ.'
J)~'iIO.. H -,~~:;..: . .: <:'. '.' I.:'K.:' . . ".. ..' :.'.
",:." :.' . ..... ..~,~~~t.,...".,!.. . ,~"K.;,,~..t!-~~~I;h'< ~""'.;I""'~"'Jl.~)I,,l<lf'; hiQll'
.~. ..... ...,;,~:W.~~lk;ftl;;.i~i,
the trut... O~...t&.. :~~..~l..i~pti~~lj(lhnt 'oiiL-".t~~i!"di':': .
Flor14.a, ~.r:r.u4' ~i:'Y1r'u,o~'ti. ...;i"~~r1't1 pf -.o'Uoo 1051
ot *b. R,.,11.4 Cft,,~al ih_u,.. ot.i,.iItia;.... ...~~rdl~ h 'he
~roYlI1~Q. &ad pr~oe4ur. ',rOT14.4 rO~'1~i~'o'10a 10'. of ~he
It''Yl.e4 O4lo.ral "atu'" 0 t "101\14&, .44 t'~r ...4 1Il 0 ou14.raUoA
ot the ~ of Four Hun4r'4 r'D aa4 00/100 lollar. ("10.00) '0
. ,
ib.1D in buA Pfi14 b)' 1.1. X1sh.l1 of n.alnu Oou'" noli"".
. . . I
r.oelp. of wbloh i. h'J'lb1 aotDOW1'~4, bay. <<raa'.A, barl&lA.4,
.014 a~ oonY'1.d to tb. .ala I.E. X1<<h.l1 an4 hi. heir. &at
a.II18'I1', torev.r, 'ho.. oe r~a.l.~ nbIDerr.4 l'Lnd.I, 4e.Od b.d al
toUow., tOewit,
fR40f ." rrom an 1n.er,,0'10D ot Borth l1n. or 114r1dg.
IYlaue and -eftt l1ne or O~o'ola Ayeoue, ~n We.' .lonr
Jorih 11n. of 114J'lq. AYlnul au te.t toav.r&Be high
w.i.r 1n Ol.arwat.r 8&1 \0 pOln' of be,1nn1na,
!beao. We.t 10~O fe.t ,~ .hann.l 1ft Cl.arwa'er BaI,
Th.no. io a Northerl1 GOur.. aloo<< I.~' ~14. ot onann.l
. 41.taoo. of 160.09 fe.' du. Norih,
Th.no. Ea.' 1140 feet to .T'r8~' hl~h watermark,
Theno. 30uth 1? deRT6" 02' W'lt 16a teet to ~01nt of
be~1nnln<<,
COftilllnlnp, '.1 norell, 1II0re or leHU, and 111"~ aM. heloti':
1n Cl.arwaUr, 'lorlda, 1n ToW'nffhlp 29 30uth. ftlJ~e 10
Ealt, Count1 or P1nella., 3tat~ or Flor1da.
TO J{AV,; AND TO flOLD the Itu1e1 Ilb:>ve D1.nt1ooec 1.1\(. Quorl br:d
land Ilne !:r.r.,111u, and 1111 the Hel. an' lntere','. or the Trullt...
ther.1n M~ ~rant'Q to them hT 1eot10n 1061 ot tho ~.vlft.4 o.n.rl1
~'atutell ot ~lorlda. unto the N.ld N.E. l1~h.ll and hlH he1r. kn4
aMll"nl forevor.
"~"~mlDDIlVIl(f_fo ;tbi "nli... ''If' "be .1e" rnal
>."Upr~o".I'.1iPU.84:o:t Ylor1411, AD4 their .u1!o.uOrll."U'u84.1v14e4
~';,.." ,.,.,' .
"~'br....toul"~h' In*ere,' 1D .ad G1U, 1n 604 to " UD4~~,,1<1'4.,'hr""
fOUJ'Ual hhrut 1ft all the JlbOlfJlhLlh, mln.rda aDd 11I.,&1,' U~a'
I.
'0
~~ -1-
. ;,1. ~ I
.....
.r:.-
I
"
I
I
(t'
,
I
.I,,'.J. :'
. . ~ ...f"
'. "1
!
~
y-
.
. NO.929
APR.' 2.20e2 5:53PM
P.3/3
"DB 40 I ! 4-4-(, ,~!
aboy. 4...or1 'oe4 land. I ~~
;I."
-.--'t'.
~.. ;.'
.', 'Or unA'r 'I.. ..1d
"". .:
,1:'.~' ,",,~Ialwt !G~",,' laUd HU. ln and to an
",!.:l.l'.r..' lA all tbe p"l'oleu 'hat 1& or
above deSOrlbed land, wlth the
.....
Trustee., ot the
" '.
Fund ot the State ot
, .
1101"14& hay.. bereunto lNbsorlbl'.:G their nan,ee
and attlxed thelr leul.., uad hkve OQU'H:cl. the
, j
I
i
/: IIId or THE D.i;PARTl'j:;NT OF .\GRICU~., tP.!:: O~ !'!".;
STAn: 0' FLORIDA, '0 :)tt nert:unto aJ'1'1xetL, ..t
thu Ctapltol, 1n t~. CltJ of I'Ell! hu:'aeo::, on
tbh. the ' 'h db1 of hnuary :.. D. 1920.
,
. ,
6J~ '>-L~~(,"ALI
ernol'. I
(1.::AL)
(--Y;:~".'i-:--< '~"~<~C-I
'-, -- . I V,..(' Q.
" , .
'--r~iY'1e"iier7;t. - .
( n:Al.)
(S:'.AL)
I". ' ~
~ ()EALI
f'orr,r [~~1 "nl' j( ,\;'d'~u 'ture7--
JILlDf.EaJ.:..!I!..u.I..~:..?1.o' otOOle .(-1.; II
AD IIOOIDID rw !II BOO1 NOTlt ~ ROVl.
I. I. O'~, 01erk 01rcUit Court.
P1.ae11a. Ocarty, 1101'1<18
1
06/24/2002 MON 11:21 FAX 727 7.606 FDC Clearwater
~ .
~ 002/002
.
Bayview Condominiums
Drainage Report
Florida Design Consultants, Inc. Clearwater, FL
June 24, 2002
The site consists of 1.1 acres located directly on Clearwater Bay (St. Joseph Sound).
Most of the parking is located within the building. There is no storm system design
storm tabulations as there are no storm structures designed tor the project. Attenuation of
pre and post nmoff volumes are not needed as the discharge of runoff is directly to the
bay.
Water quality treatment is to be provided for the first half inch ofronoff. Water quality
computations are shown on sheet 3 of the site plans. We have computed that 3050 cu ft
of treatment volume is to be filtered prior to being released from the site. This assumes
that an additional 50% of the first half inch (the first % inch) is to be treated. The internal
drainage system plwnbjng will direct roof runoff and interior parking areas drainage, as
well as trench drains at the garage entrances, to the treatment vault.
FILl
, "iC2O'
,:L.~.~j=~ L
L'! "
, . '-
,. >= ctl~~j;~}<';l:
, - .~" I
Q:\Buyvit:w CondQminilll\lS' 997-!90.doc
OO/24/2~02 MON 11: 21 FAX 727.8606 FDC ~learwater
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ENGlNfEltS. ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & I'LANNERS
DATE:
TO:
FAX:
FROM:
RE:
CC:
.
FAX COVER SHEET
%;1~h>t
,,5~z - ~~~~
~ fOt7n"
~. ~.
~~ 1.c#}r/
;<. ~'3J7))1
( )
PHONE: (727) 724-8422
FAX: (727) 724-8606
-,
TIME:
PHONE:
~.rnJ L~ @'i
Ii LUL-
:1 n'
I..:.,. Ii! .
" I
_J L-J
:'~.l'.~i ," ~:~' 'lL:;\,,-'
C' . /01:': C.:;
'WL
.------....
J
TNC
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET ( ~)
COMMENTS:
"2 I
f 1fl7110~
~~/ (/
Hard copy instru\:tions: ( ) Regular Mail; ( ) Overnight Mail; (X) None to Follow.
~ 001 002
The infonnation contained in this transmission is privileged and ~nfidential. It is mtended for the use of
the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended addressee, the reader
is hereby notified that any consideration, dissemination or duplication of this communication is strictly
prohibited. lfthe recipient ha~ received this 9ommunication in error, please return this transmission to us
at the above address by mail. If this communication was received in the U.S., please notify us immediately
by phone.
THANK YOU!
2639 McCORMICK ORIVE · CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759
(727) 724.8422 . FAX (727)724-8606
T:\fiIX
._-
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
HOUSING DIVISION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
September 20,2002
Mr. Tom Cavanaugh
P.A.C. Land Development Corporation
730 Bonnie Brae Street
Winter Park, FL 32789
'(:'11. E
RE: Development Order regarding case FL.J;)?OO?-Ofl017 at 700 North Osceola A venue
Dear Mr. Cavanaugh:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On September 17, 2002, the Community Development Board (CDB)
reviewed your application to increase the height of a building with attached dwellings, within the
Downtown District, from 50 feet to 81.42 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project under the provisions of Section 2-903. The proposal includes a 28-unit condominium
development within a single, 93,672 square foot, six-story building (with two levels of under
building parking). Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Community
Development Board APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The application is consistent with the Northwest Periphery Area in the Periphery Plan.
4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of approval:
1. That the density of the site be limited to 28 dwellings units (25 dwelling units per acre);
2. That should addressing stormwater issues result in a site plan which is significantly different
from the one approved by the Community Development Board, the site plan must be
resubmitted to the Board for review;
3. That any encroachments into wetlands be mediated through an exotic, nuisance vegetation
control and maintenance plan approved and coordinated with Staff, prior to the issuance of
any permits;
4. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits;
BRJAN J AUNGS"i', MAYOR-COiviMIsslm:ER
ED :HART, VICE IvL\YOR-COMMlSSIONER Y:fH1TNEY (yR:\Y. CO~vHviJSSIONER
HoYr I-!A,\jJLTON, COMMISSIONER BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AEfIRMATIVE .F!..CTION Ej'\'lPLO~!ERil
.
.
"
September 20, 2002
Cavanaugh - Page Two
5. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
or as modified by the CDB;
6. That all signage comply with Code; and
7. That, if physically feasible and deemed appropriate by Staff, the width of the sidewalk be
enlarged from four to five-foot sidewalk be installed along the west side of Osceola A venue.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (September 17, 2003) and all required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity
to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate
the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter
with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may
be initiated by a property owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval)
within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall
stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for
your case will expire on October 1, 2002.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 727.562.4558.
Zoning information is available through the City's web site at www.c1earwater-fl.com via the
"Clearwater Parcel and Zoning" link and "Community Development Code" link (via the
Planning Department site).
a;;;::~.
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
CC: Mr. Dan Gleichowski, property owner
S:\Plallllillg Department\C D B\FlexVllactive or Fillished Applicatiolls\Osceola N 700 Bayview COlldomillum - Approved\Osceola N 700
DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc
.
.
C I T Y 0 F
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
March 28, 2003
Michael Ryan
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
215 North Eola Drive
Orlando, FL 32801
Re: Certificate of Concurrency
700 N. Osceola Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33755
Dear Mr. Ryan:
In accordance with your written request, attached are Certificates of Concurrency for the above
project from the following persons/Departments and their area of review:
1. Steve L. Doherty, Public Works Administration - Sanitary sewer, potable water and solid
waste (also addresses storm water drainage).
2. Paul Bertels, Traffic Manager - Roadway traffic capacity.
3. Deborah W. Richter, Parks and Recreation Department - Parks.
Should you have any additional questions, feel free to contact me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
i;!.::t:. ~l:,~~
Senior Planner
Attachments
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COillMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYf HAMILTON, COMM1SSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.L]ONSON, COiIIMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND MFIRivlATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
. , .
.
.
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4750 FAX (727) 562-4755
PUBUC WORKS
ADMINISTRATION
March 25, 2003
Michael A. Ryan
Londes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor and Reed, Attorneys at Law
215 North Eola Drive
Orlando, FL 32801
Re: Certificate of Concurrency
Dear Mr. Ryan:
In reply to your letter of March 10, 2003 regarding sufficiency of service for the property identified as 700
North Osceola Avenue, (A.K.A. Parcel # 09/29/15/00000/420/0400), this letter is to certify that adequate
sanitary sewer capacity, potable water capacity and solid waste service exist to serve the proposed
development of a 28 unit condominium on the subject property. The City of Clearwater presently has
stormwater infrastructure in place; however, the proposed development must meet the City's stormwater
criteria.
Sincerely,
~ ~
Stephen L. Doherty
Public Works Administration
Attachment
CC: file
BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR,COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILLjONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAl EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
~ (~
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
,;' I ~.. .~~....~
u!'.",~,\ I ~..' '.' ~ ~"~
"'l '~~.... '-/--.......,/'lTj' ,'. I ""' ;l1l"
,"'~,~_--'.- '.1, '..;('1
"~_" :-.".o'_~""","i
\~~.'rf'- ':c ~.:::::..:::::-. . ~c,
, . ~-_.._- . -,' ."
';;,~~_--"c:"==-.. .~~.
~~~",..;.~;;."~~.,,
"~""~n~1-,,,j.'
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4750 FAX (727) 562-4755
PUBUC WORKS
ADMINISTRATION
March 26, 2003
Michael A. Ryan
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
215 North Eola Drive
Orlando, FL 32801
Re: Certificate of Concurrency
Dear Mr. Ryan:
In reply to your letter of March 10, 2003 regarding sufficiency of service for the property
identified as 700 North Osceola Avenue, (A.K.A. Parcel # 09/29/15/00000/420/0400),
this letter is to certify that adequate roadway capacity exists for traffic generated by the
proposed development of a 28 unit condominium on the subject property.
<:'
-Sinc~
~~
Paul Bertels, Traffic Manager
Public Works Administration
Attachment
Cc: file
BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR,COMMiSSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMiSSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRlyIATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
, ,
.
.
~~~~~~
I~~~~~";.
fi:$ ,,\L/ _ !;\ ~
a2:. - - ~:,.'
""~.:-- ~~
...~"--==- ..~r-..."~
~..(~~I->:~~'vt~~\
~~~]~jlj'~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUiLDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4800 FAX (727) 562-4825
PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT
Post~
Fax Note
March 27, 2003
Mr. Michael A. Ryan
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor and Reed, P.A.
215 North Eola Drive
Orlando, FL 32801
Re: Certificate of Concurrency, Clearwater Harbor Apartments,
700 N. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, FL
Dear Mr. Ryan:
In response to your letter dated March 10, 2003, the City of Clearwater presently has
sufficient parks to serve the proposed 28 unit condominium at the above noted property.
However, due to the proposed increase from 7 to 28 units, this project will be required to
satisfy the Recreation and Open Space Land Dedication Ordinance. Open Space,
Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees are due prior to issuance of building
permit or final plat (if applicable), whichever comes first.
Sincerely,
RECEIVED
0., ~ # / "p,(- ,f!---1l--
tfU-),...'1l 1-rv,-,0 U -~~t~
MAR 2. 7 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Deborah W. Richter
Management Analyst
Attachment: Open Space/Recreation Impact Worksheet
cc: Art Kader, Assistant Director, Parks and Recreation Department
Wayne Wells, Senior Planner, Planning Department
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE IviAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BIll. JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
LL
.
o
>-
f-
()
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: /1,- cJ,,.6U1 ti--_
FAX: '+-01" <&4-3 . ~
Phone: 4-07 - S +~ - 4-<000
FROM:
DATE:~ 3/ UJ03
!lJs
Phone:~7. S\2" trot
RE: 700 N. 0 ju..o ~_ F+ve. .
MESSAGE: Orlcflrw.-\i ~Q..(J ~\e.~.
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) S-
DATE, TIME
FAX HO./t'-lAME
DURATIOH
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
ANSMISSIOt'l \/ERIFICATIm~ REPORT
03/28 11: 51
914078434444
00:02:00
05
OK
ST AHDAF'D
ECM
TIME 03/28/2003 11:53
HAr~E PLAN
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
~
i.
It
.
Lowndes
Drosdick
Doste. r r ~
Kantor~
Reed, EA.
215 NORTH EOLA DRIVE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
450 SOUTH ORANGE AVENUE, SUITE 800
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801
POST OFFICE BOX 2809, ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32802-2809
TEL.: 407-843-4600/ FAX.: 407-843-4444
www.lowndes-law.com
A T TOR N E Y S
A T LAW
MICHAELA. RYAN
North Eola Drive Office
Direct Dial: (407) 418-6355
mike.ryan@lowndes-law.com
.............
iii MERITAS LAW FIRMS WORLDWIDE
March 10,2003
SENT VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
RECEIVED
Director, Planning and Development Services
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33758
~4il.P r, , ':mn3
~~*rlCi'~ ~ Ai. ,t...\,;~"~
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Re: Certificate of Concurrency
Dear Sir or Madam:
This law firm represents Wachovia Bank, National Association ("Wachovia"), the lender in a
transaction involving property located at 700 N. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33755, also
known as Clearwater Harbor Apartments.
The current use on the property is a 7 unit apartment complex consisting of two buildings. The
purchaser proposes to demolish the existing apartment buildings and redevelop the property as a
condominium containing 28 units.
Prior to closing this transaction, Wachovia, requires a certificate of concurrency, or its
equivalent, from the City that adequate water, sewer, solid waste, storm water drainage, parks, and
roadway traffic capacity will be available for the proposed project pursuant to the City's Growth
Management Plan. The certificate must show the expiration date, if any, of the certificate.
For your information, I have enclosed a copy of the property data obtained from the Pinellas
County Property Appraiser's office. If the City charges a fee to provide the requested information,
please contact me immediately and I will see that a check is prepared and sent to you by overnight
delivery.
e
e
City of Clearwater
March 10, 2003
Page 2
Your assistance in providing a certificate of concurrency, or its equivalent, as quickly as possible
is greatly appreciated, since a closing on this property is scheduled for March 28, 2003. Should you
have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
MAR/cad
c: Lisa Bott
Tom Cavanaugh
Lee Smith
0001802\095877\631155\1
~inellas County Property App.r Information: 09 29 15 00000 420 O.
Page 1 of 4
..
View COffiRarable Residential Sales
Mass Appraisal is the systematic appraisal of groups of properties as of a given date using
standardized procedures and statistical testing. Its purpose is to provide an equitable and
efficient appraisal of all property in a jurisdiction for ad-valorem tax purposes.
We recognize that there is a reasonable range of values within which a property can sell. Our
Mass Appraisal Market Value tends toward the lower end of the range. Recent upgrades or
remodeling efforts completed by a seller in order to prepare a property for sale, especially those
on the interior of a building, are often not reflected in our Comparable Sales Value.
Finally, our values are historical and are developed using arms length sales from the three
years prior to January 1. For this reason, our values are generally lower than what a seller will
ask for a property in today's appreciating market.
Appraisal Information
09 / 29 / 15 / 00000 / 420 / 0400
10-Har-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:53:09
Residential Property Add ress, Use, and Sales
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 700 N OSCEOLA AUE
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t : Z61. 00
sales froM 2000 - 2001 :
685,400 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/IMp
Plat InforMation 5 /1,999 10,519/Z,451 435,000 (Q) I
0000 : Book Pgs - Z /1. 994 8,5601 614 319,000 (Q) I
0000 : Book Pgs - 8 /1.990 7,346/1.767 no,ooo (Q) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
2002 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 475,000 HOMestead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 475,000 Tax ExeMp t %: .000
Other ExeMp t : 0
Taxable: 475,000 Agr icul tural: 0
2002 Tax InforMation Land InforMation
District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Bay
Clearwater View:
02 Millage: Z3. Z911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: lL063.n
. ../cgi-scr3 ?0=1 &a=l &b=l &r=&s= 1 &u=0&p=09+ 29+ 15+00000+420+0400241 %2C372323%20/1 0/03
~~nellas County Property APp.r Information: 09 29 15 00000 420 O.
Page 2 of 4
1) 1Z9 x Z95 5,500.00 I Z9. 00 F
Special Tax . 00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
. 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
11,063. Z7 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 400,868
2002 taxes will be :
11,063. Z7
Short Legal
Description
FROM INTERSECTION OF W LINE OF OSCEOLA AUE & N
LINE OF ELDRIDGE ST TH RUN NE'LV ALONG W SIDE OF
Building Information
. !3uildingl
. Building 2
Building #1
09 / 29 /
15 / 00000 / 420 / 0400
:01
10-Mar-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:53:09
Res iden t ial Card 0 I 0 f Z Prop Use: Z Z Z Land Use: 08 L i v ing Un i ts : 3
IMp Type: Res Conversion Prop Address: 700 N OSCEOLA AUE
Structural
Elemen.ts
Foundation
Floor SysteM
Exterior Wall
Roof FraMe
Roof Cover
Continuous Wall
Wood
Frame/Stucco
Gable-Hip
Composite Shingle
Quality
Year Built
Effective Age
Heating
Cooling
Fixtures
Other Depreciation
Functional Depreciation
EcononoMic Depreciation
Average
I, 946
ZO
Central Duct
Cooling (Central)
IS
o
o
o
# Stories 1.0
Floor Finish Crpt/Un~I/SftWd/Terr
Interior Finish Dr~wall/Plaster
Sub
Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 Z.536 7) .00 0
2) Open Po rch . ZO Z8 8) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11 ) .00 0
6) .00 0 12 ) . 00 0
Residen.tial Extra Features
I
Description
DiMensions
Price
Un i ts
Value
RCD
Year
I
.. ./egi -ser3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &r=&s= 1 &u=0&p=09+ 29+ 15+00000+420+0400241 %2C3 72323 %2 3/10/03
, ~inellas Co
,
1) ASP
2) PAT
, 3) fIR
4)
5)
6)
~
Building
0
10-Har
Reside
IMp Ty
Founda
Floor
Exteri
Roof F
Roof C
# 5tor
Floor
Interi
1) Bas
2) Upp
3) Ope
4)
5)
6)
Des
1) ASP
2) PAT
3) PAT
4)
5)
6)
.../cgi-scr3?
unty Property APp.r Information: 09 29 15 00000 420 O.
HALT
IO/DECK
EPLACE
#2
Page 3 of 4
5X250 1. 00 1.250 0 1,250 999
21 2S f 1.50 212 0 1,030 1,990
2,500.00 1 0 1,300 1.915
.00 0 0 0 0
.00 0 0 0 0
.00 0 0 0 0
TO TA L RECORD VA L U E : 3,580
9 / 29 /
15 / 00000 / 420 / 0400
:02
-2003 JiM 5Mith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:53:11
n t ial Card 02 0 f 2 Prop Use: 222 Land Use: 08 L i v ing Un i ts : 4
pe: Hul. t Res Apt <4 St Prop Address: 100 " OSC EO LA AU E
ies 2. 0
Finish Crpt/Unyl./SftWd/Terr
or Finish Drywal.l./Pl.aster
tion
5ysteM
or Wall
raMe
over
Structural
Elements
Continuous Wal.l.
Sl.ab on Grade
ConcBk Stucco/Recl.ad
Gabl.e-Hip
Composite Shingl.e
Qual ity
Year Built
Effective Age
Heating
Cooling
Fixtures
Other Depreciation
Functional Depreciation
EcononoMic Depreciation
Average
1,915
20
Central. Duct
Cool.ing (Central.)
15
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Factor Area Description Factor Area
1. 00 2,883 7) .00 0
.90 921 8) .00 0
.30 111 9) .00 0
.00 0 10) .00 0
.00 0 11) . 00 0
. 00 0 12 ) .00 0
Description
e Area
er Stry Base Area
n Po rch
cription
HALT
IO/DECK
IO/DECK
Residential Extra Features
DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year
6X250 1. 00 1.500 0 1,500 1,990
8X19 2.50 152 0 150 1,915
268Sf 1.50 268 0 880 1,980
.00 0 0 0 0
.00 0 0 0 0
.00 0 0 0 0
TO TA L RECORD VA LU E : 2,530
0= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &r=&s= 1 &u=0&p=09+ 29+ 15+00000+420+0400241 %2C3 72323 %2 3/1 0/03
,finellas County Property APp.r Information: 0929 15 00000420 O.
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
Back to Search Pag~
An explanation of this screen
Page 4 of 4
.. ./cgi -scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &r=&s= 1 &u=0&p=09+ 29+ 15+00000+420+0400241 %2C3 72323 %2 3/1 0/03
.
CITY OF
.
C LEA RW ATE R
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
March 25, 2003
Mr. Michael A. Ryan
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor, & Reed, P.A.
215 North Eola Drive
Orlando, FL 32801
Re: 700 North Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33755
Dear Mr. Ryan:
The above addressed property is zoned Downtown District (D) with an underlying land use designation of
Central Business District (CBD). The site is also governed by the City's Periphery Plan.
Attached dwellings are a permitted use in the Downtown District and underlying land use designation of
CBD provided all criteria in the Community Development Code and Periphery Plan are met. This use
requires a site plan review through an application to the Development Review Committee (Levell), and
possibly to the Community Development Board (Level 2), dependent on the proposed site plan.
Based on the information we have, the parcel is 1.134 acres and has an allotted density of 25 units per
acre, which may permit up to a maximum of 28 units. The information you provided from the Pinellas
County Property Appraiser's office identifies a smaller area (0.874 acres) and would only permit 21 units.
I would recommend obtaining a current survey of the parcel to accurately determine the permitted number
of dwelling units.
Should you have any additional questions, feel free to contact me at 727-562-4557.
Sincerely,
JJ~~
Frank G. Gerlock
Development Review Manager
Cc:
Development Review Staff
Case file FLD2002-060 17
FILE
COpy
S:\Planning Departmentlzoning Itrs\700 N. Osceola Ave (D).doc
BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISS10NER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
f-
LL
o
>-
-
o
TO:
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
, 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
~D ' ~;/ lit;~, uf2-
724 -- b;:.c:D0
FAX:
Phone:
~ &;,~, p' ;::
FROM: J' f! 1 CA_J(_r.
DATE: z,.- Z 1 /05
MESSAGE:
D r_.
, !)
- \. '
Phone:
eLl) ~), 6'b' /") ,\,"-,,'-"" I 1
" ~' J j,,r ,
SUBJECT: " j /" "jc:...-': VI
"
'I' tz ~#" ,') ,.-. .--.,.- ,,' \
\ !,' . ,~ . ': ' iii"''' "_ r\ , ~;t ,'~~ '/
\ OJ 1..., L.~~ ~J{ ~ j T..~ ( )
( ,~
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
3
.
..
.
.
C IT Y 0 F C LEA R W ATE R
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
HOUSING DMSION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FA-X (727) 562-4576
September 20, 2002
Mr. Tom Cavanaugh
P.A.c. Land Development Corporation
730 Bonnie Brae Street
Winter Park, FL 32789
tFBl E
RE: Development Order regarding case FL.:Q?OO? _OfiO 17 at 700 North Osceola A venue
Dear Mr. Cavanaugh:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On September 17, 2002, the Community Development Board (CDB)
reviewed your application to increase the height of a building with attached dwellings, within the
Downtown District, from 50 feet to 81.42 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project under the provisions of Section 2-903. The proposal includes a 28-unit condominium
development within a single, 93,672 square foot, six-story building (with two levels of under
building parking). Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Community
Development Board APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The application is consistent with the Northwest Periphery Area in the Periphery Plan.
4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of approval:
1. That the density of the site be limited to 28 dwellings units (25 dwelling units per acre);
2. That should addressing stormwater issues result in a site plan which is significantly different
from the one approved by the Community Development Board, the site plan must be
resubmitted to the Board for review;
3. That any encroachments into wetlands be mediated through an exotic, nuisance vegetation
control and maintenance plan approved and coordinated with Staff, prior to the issuance of
an y permits;
4. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits;
BRIAN J. AUNGSTl ~.t-\YOR-CO;vi~iISSIO~.!ER
ED I-L\RT, VICE IvL\YOR-COMM1SSIONEH \~/HITNEY GF.:\' . CO;',ir-.ifSSIOi\ER
I-ioYT HA;\iILTON) COMMISSIONER BILL]OI\;SOi':, CO"i.~IISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND A1'FIRMATIVE ACTION ElviPLOYER"
!II,'
.
.
September 20,2002
Cavanaugh - Page Two
5. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
or as modified by the CDB;
6. That all signage comply with Code; and
7. That, if physically feasible and deemed appropriate by Staff, the width of the sidewalk be
enlarged from four to five-foot sidewalk be installed along the west side of Osceola A venue.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (September 17, 2003) and all required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity
to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate
the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter
with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may
be initiated by a property owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval)
within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall
stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for
your case will expire on October 1, 2002.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 727.562.4558.
Zoning information is available through the City's website at www.clearwater-fl.com via the
"Clearwater Parcel and Zoning" link and "Community Development Code" link (via the
Planning Department site).
a;;:;~
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
CC: Mr. Dan Gleichowski, property owner
S:\Planlling Deparll1len^C D B\FlexVnaclive or Finished Applicalions\Osceola N 700 Bayview Condol1linul1l - Approved\Osceola N 700
DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc
.
.
ACTION AGENDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
September 17, 2002
Meeting called to order at 2:05 p.m. at City Hall
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: AUQust 20.2002
ACTION: APPROVED - 6:0
B. CONSENT AGENDA: (Items 1-8)
1. Case: FLD2002-06017 - 700 North Osceola Avenue Leve/2 Application
Applicant: Dan Gleichowski, J.J. Dan Mar, Inc.
Owner: J.J. Dan Mar, Inc.
Representative: Tom Cavanaugh, P.A.C. Land Development Corporation.
Location: 1.12-acres located on the northwest corner of Eldridge Street and North Osceola
Avenue.
Atlas Page: 277B.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request:
Flexible Development approval to increase the required height of an attached dwelling building within the
Downtown District from 50 feet to 81.42 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
under the provisions of Section 2-903.
Proposed Use: A 28-unit condominium development within a single, 93,672 square foot, six-story
building.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
ACTION: APPROVED - 6:0 with Conditions: 1) That the density of the site be limited to 28
dwellings units (25 dwelling units per acre); 2) That should addressing stormwater issues result
in a site plan which is significantly different from the one approved by the Community
Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to the Board for review; 3) That any
encroachments into wetlands be mediated through an exotic, nuisance vegetation control and
maintenance plan approved and coordinated with Staff, prior to the issuance of any permits; 4)
That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 5) That the
final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted or as
modified by the CDB; 6) That all signage comply with Code; and7) A 5-foot wide sidewalk to be
constructed along Osceola Avenue if adequate space is available in the right-of-way and if staff
approves.
acdb0902
"..... /"I
.~l '~.'.". ,..1"'.':' ;.".'.~.'"
. .""tI ,,( ,/
t'. ('-'
1 ""-C
09/17/02
.
.
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
Case No.fib ~2- OCo 0 { 7 Meeting Date: elf - ( ,- ;)..00 ~
Location: 700 ~O~Tbf OS<!..ecL.A- A~
o Current Use: O~f,J.~ YA-doll A~",-~
o Active Code Enforcement cas~es:
o Address numbe8no) (vacant land)
o LandsCaPin~(nO)
o Overgrown (yes) B
o Debris (yes)8
o Inoperative vehicle{s) (yes)6)
o Building{s) ~fair) (poor) (vacant land)
o Fencing (nOne)&dilaPidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
o paint~ (fair) (poor) (garish)
o Grass Parking (yes)~
o Residential Parking Violations (ye@
o Signage (none~not ok) (billboard)
o Parking (n/a~andiCapped) (needs repaving)
o Dumpster (enclosed) ~nclO~
o Outdoor storage (yes ~
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
Date of Review: J"'~ ~;;.... Reviewed by: I)LA--I k. ~ u--u~
Revised 03-29-01
.
e
11:30 a.m.
Case;'R))2002-06017-700 North Osceola Avenue.
Owner/Applicant: Dan Gleichowski, J.J. Dan Mar, Inc.
Representative: Tom Cavanaugh, P.A.c. Land Development Corp.
Location: The 1. II-acre site is located on the southwest corner of North Osceola Avenue and
Eldridge Street.
Atlas Page: 277B.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the required height of an attached dwelling
within the Downtown District from 50 feet to II feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-903.
Proposed Use: The proposal includes a a-unit condominium development within a single, .
square foot, six-story building.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
FiLE
Attendees included:
City Staff: Lisa Fierce, Debbie Richter, Mark Parry, Bob Maran, Cory Martens, Tom Glenn, Don
Melone, Wayne Wells, Paul Bertels, Terry Finch and Joe Colbert
Applicant/Representative: Tom Cavanaugh, Robert Pergolizzi, Blake Plumley and Barry
Bywaler
The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees due prior to issuance of
building permits for 21 additional units. (Residential expansion from 7 apartments to 28
condominium units; crediting existing 7 units) Contact Deb Richter at 562-4817.
2. Stormwater:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity, Staff mayor may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB
3. Traffic engineering:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity, Staff mayor may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB.
b) There are five motorcycle spots shown. These spots don't count as part of required
parking (1-1.5 per unit required = 28 spaces minimum if that is the number of units
proposed - see planning comments for density).
c) Revise site plan to show dimensions of all parking spaces, loading areas, fire lanes, drive
aisles, columns and column spacings;
d) No dimensions are shown for space labeled "C" - show dimensions. No credit for
compact spaces.
e) All spaces must be a minimum of 19 feet in length - along the west end - some are shown
at 16 feet - clarify.
f) A minimum of nine feet in width is required for all parking spaces. Additional width
may be necessary where columns or walls may impede maneuverability or vision (3-1402
A). The site plan needs to show dimensioning for all columns and column spacing. The
columns cannot encroach upon the parking space.
g) There are three parking spaces shown on Eldridge Street which back out into the right-of-
way. These are not permissible and need to be removed (3-1402 C).
h) Need large-scale plans of parking levels - can't read 8 Y2 by 11 submittal. It's not clear
how Level One and Level Two parking areas work - Revise plans to clarify.
i) The two spaces at the entrance along Osceola A venue are unsafe and need to be removed.
,DRe Action Agenda - July 12, 2002 - page 7
e
.
j) Existing on street parking along south side of Eldridge St. must remain for the entire
length of the street.
k) It is unclear how circle and surrounding areas are intended to be used - clarify;
1) Indicate where any gates will be located and provide adequate stacking spaces;
m) Need a minimum of two car lengths or 40 feet from edge of pavement of the public
roadway;
n) All of the above (3 a - m) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25,2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC.
4. General eneineerine:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
b) Eldridge Street will have to meet City of Clearwater standards;
c) A sidewalk four feet in width will be required along all right-of-ways;
d) Clarify the use of brick pavers in the right-of-way;
e) The cul-de-sac shown doesn't meet City of Clearwater standards;
f) There are shaded interior landscape areas shown in the right-of-way. Revise to show
them completely within the confines of the property;
g) A drop curb will be required at all proposed drive aprons;
h) There is a two-inch gas main along Osceola Avenue that is not shown on the drawings.
Revise the site plan to show that gas main;
i) ADA compliant sidewalk ramps are required at the intersection of Osceola Avenue and
Eldridge Street.
j) Need to core the existing sanitary sewer manhole for sewer connections prior to the
issuance of any permits;
k) All of the above (4 a - i) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25,2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC
5. Buildine:
a) Indicate the transition line from X to AE flood zone;
b) Construction within 18 feet of existing seawall not permitted; would need to reconstruct
the seawall which would mean there would be work within the jurisdictional area -
would need to secure permits through DEP;
c) All of the above (5 a - b) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC
6. Plannine:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
b) Need large scale plans of parking levels - cannot read 8 Y2 by 11;
c) Clarify the number of units proposed for the site - 1.11 acres will support 27 dwelling
units where 28 are proposed. Either the site has to grow or the number of units needs to
decrease - revise application;
d) The parking requirement is based on the number of units - see above comment - need
minimum of 27 spaces that are meeting all dimensional standards - unclear if this is met;
e) Clarify how the proposed height was calculated, need all details about measurements on
the plans;
f) It is not clear how the proposed height, bulk is in keeping with adjacent properties - see
General Applicability criteria - clarify;
g) What is the existing and proposed valuation?
h) State how will the proposal not affect the health and safety of surrounding properties;
i) Show more detail on architectural plans, what type of relief is proposed - five feet?
j) Provide separate plans for utilities, drainage and landscaping.
DRC Action Agenda - July 12, 2002 - page 8
.
.
k) Have neighbors been notified? Old Clearwater Bay neighborhood association should be
contacted by the applicant as soon as possible to get comments;
1) Revise the site plan to eliminate all use of chainlink fencing;
m) Clarify that the area to the west of the site is not wetlands under the jurisdiction of the
State of Florida. If it is, a 25 foot setback will be necessary;
n) Need periphery Plan goals/objectives discussed in written format - how are they being
met?
0) All required site triangles must be met - 20 foot by 20 foot from the back of pavement for
all driveways, curb cuts, etc. Site plans to be revised prior to next DRC review;
p) All of the above (6 a - p) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25,2002 which will result in an August 15, 2002 DRC
7. Solid waste:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by theCDB;
b) Clarify how solid waste containers will be moved out to the street to service - a curb cut
may be necessary;
c) All of the above (7 a - b) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25,2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC
8. Land resource:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff may or may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
b) Two trees missing from tree survey, resubmit with corrections.
c) Show all trees on the Site Plan.
d) All of the above (8 a - c) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25,2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC.
9. Fire:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
b) Need to provide a fire lane 20 feet in width. If Eldridge Street is to be used as the fire
lane, it must be widened to a total of 30 feet (back of curb to back of curb). Any
widening and/or use of the street as a fire lane must not effect parking on the south side
of the street. The widening and use of the fire lane may impact the proposed loading
zone;
c) Provide a fire hydrant on Eldridge Street and locate the Fire Department Connection
within 40 feet of the hydrant and at least 15 feet from the building;
d) Provide an approved turnaround for Fire Apparatus as per NFPA 1, Section 3-5.2
e) Provide a complete High Rise package, including but not limited to, Fire Pump,
Generator, Standpipe System, Sprinkler System, Fire Alarm System, Fire Control Room,
Fireman's Phone System w/Jacks, Stairwell smoke removal system. Provide prior to the
issuance of any permits;
f) Gates require an approved Emergency Entry System as per Pinellas County Ordinance
98-4. Show on Construction plans prior to the issuance of any permits;
g) Provide a Knox Key Box on building for emergency egress, as per NFP A 1. Show on
Construction Plans prior to the issuance of any permits;
h) All of the above (8 a -d) to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC
i) All of the above (8 e - g) to be provided prior to the issuance of any permits.e
DRC Action Agenda - July 12, 2002 - page 9
.
.
10. Landscapinl!:
a) The landscape plan looks like it's still in its early stages. It just doesn't feel like it's
hanging together yet. Bottlebrush trees are probably small for a 100-foot tall building.
Utilize living groundcover instead of all the mulch along the north property line. Address
as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002
which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC;
11. Environmental:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff may or may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
b) The swimming pool encroaches within the 25-foot setback from wetlands on the south
side. This encroachment can probably be accommodated if the developer provides an
exotic, nuisance vegetation control and maintenance plan for the balance of the wetland
area, which is highly impacted. The upland and vegetated wetland areas have accreted as
a result of acquiescent area created on the inside corner of two seawalls;
c) The SWFWMD requires that the developer provide treatment for the difference between
pre and post development to OFW requirements (3/4 inch); however will allow that
treatment to occur in a vault as proposed;
d) City does not allow vaults for stormwater treatment. Much of the stormwater that is
proposed to be treated is from roof runoff; the balance being from driveway and several
parking spaces. However, the two parking levels will be washed down periodically and
that water will enter floor drains and subsequently the storm system. As a compromise I
suggested that he consider routing the roof drains through the proposed vault which will
apparently have a filtration system and easy access and treat the vehicular areas in an
open system or in a system that incorporates replaceable filters that remove sediment,
oils, greases as well as associated metals. Barry indicated that if we could agree to allow
the roof drains to be treated through the vault that he would propose an alternate system
for the vehicular areas including the two parking levels. Storm water vaults are not
acceptable for water quality treatment; need solution for vehicular use area to get out
suspended solids, oil and grease, etc.; could put roof drains through vault;
e) There are disturbed wetlands here;
t) Need to delineate wetland line on the plans (all sheets) so they are legible;
g) All of the above (11 a -t) to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC
NOTES:
· The applicant may have to ask the State Fire Marshall's office to reduce or eliminate the required
turnaround for fire vehicles. Various solutions were offered by Staff including a hammerhead;
· Applicant intends to remove the existing seawall - coordinate through SWFMD and the City of
Clearwater;
· Applicant intends to submit a new survey showing that the site is now 1.12 acres which will allow 28
uni ts;
· Applicant stated that there is no chainlink fencing on their site - any CL fencing is on neighboring
properties;
· Applicant stated that mean elevation is 13.5 feet and that flood zone is 12.5 feet. The applicant will
resubmit revised elevations showing how the height was calculated.
· Send comments to Robert at rpergolizzi@fldesign.com and Thomas at tlc@paclanddevelopment.com
DRC Action Agenda - July 12, 2002 - page 10
"
.
.
. 'IfJk, f'~7:~
CITY OF CLEARWATER ~: ....~ ~
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC ~EA-iI~
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
September 17, 2002, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South
Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishine: to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetine:. Those
cases that are not contested bv the applicant. staff. neie:hborine: propertv owners. etc. will be placed on a
consent ae:enda and approved bv a sine:le vote at the bee:innine: of the meetine:.
1. J.J. Danmar. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to increase the required height of an attached
dwelling building within the Downtown District from 50 ft to 81.42 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project under the provision of Section 2-903 (Proposed Use: A 28-unit condominium development
within a single, 93,672 sq ft, six-story building) at 700 N. Osceola Ave., Sec. 09-29-15, M&B 42.04. FLD 2002-
06017
2. Paul A. & Marv H. Gelep. Helen G. Diamandis. Mahi H. Hansen. Jamie Marie Gelep. & Helen A. Gelep are
requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the required front (east and south) setbacks along Mandalay
Ave. and Papaya St., respectively from 10 ft to zero ft (to building), provide a side (north) setback of zero ft (to
building), provide a side (west) setback of 3 ft (to building) and reduce the required number of parking spaces from
57 spaces to zero spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-
803 (Proposed Use: An 11,348 sq ft, single-story retail sales and service establishment) at 442. 444. 448. 450A.
450B & 452 Mandalav Ave. and 26. 28. & 30 Papaya St., Clearwater Beach Island, Lots 80-85. FLD 2002-
07018
3. Greenmack Clearwater. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval for the construction!
reconstruction of multi-use docks (52 new slips and replacement of 15 existing slips for a total of 67 dock slips) in
association with a 200-unit residential condominium, with a reduction in the side (west) setback from 52 ft to 44 ft,
under the provisions of Section 3-601 (Proposed Use: 67 dock slips in conjunction in association with a 200-unit
condominium development) at 501 Mandalav Ave., Yacht Basin Sub, Lots 1-9. FLD 2002-07020
4. City of Clearwater & Home Depot USA. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704B and 2-1404A, to a) Reduce the
required side (south and west) setbacks from 10 ft to zero ft (to parking/pavement) within the Commercial District;
b) Reduce the required side (south and west) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to parking/pavement) within the O/SR
District; c) Increase the permitted height of a building (stadium) from 25 ft to 49 ft within the Commercial District;
d) Increase the permitted height of a building (stadium) from 30 ft to 49 ft within the OS/R District; and e) Decrease
the percentage of paved parking provided from 15 percent to 14.2 percent (Proposed Use: A Community Sports
Complex and Phillies Spring Training Facility of approximately 8,000 seats) at 21870 US 19 N., Sec 07-29-16,
M&B's 41.01 & 43.01 and The Clearwater Collection 2nd Replat, Lot 1 less rd right-of-way on E. FLD 2002-07021
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the
Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the
Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such
purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review
by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning
Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call (727) 562-4567.
'j f ;'~:'"!r."
'1.....4 .......-.,.::1 ___
~
Lisa Fierce
Planning Department
.
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
.
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500
FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON
WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO
PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST
AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 09/01102
\ c'
.
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
.
Case No. fLIJ ZCXJ 2 - O~()17
f700 AJaPJ1U tJ~LI).
o Current Use: 4 PftP..-r- ~Sa
o Active Code Enforcement casBes:
o Address numbe~nO) (vacant land)
o LandSCaPi~(nO)
o Overgrown (ye~
o Debris (yes@
o Inoperative vehicle(s) (y~
o Building(s) e(fair) (poor) (vacant land)
o Fencing (nOne~(dilaPidated) (broken andlor missing pieces)
o paint~fair) (poor) (garish)
o Grass Parking (yes)6'
o Residential Parking Violations (yes GJ
o Signage (none)~not ok) (billboard)
o Parking (n/a)@handiCapped) (needs repaving)
o Dumpster (enclOSed)~
o Outdoor storage (yes~
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
Location:
Meeting Date: 7 - /1- ZOtJ 2/
4u z
,~~', l"t
I',
,~ ~f
<:,
~
(,'::1,
",I
,/-;,i':_'->:"l~
Date of Review: {,-c?7-o"J..
Revised 03-29-01
Reviewed by: {2eLl ~ J<
.
.
,
.
.
It.
.
.
,&
..
.
.
,J
.
e
.
,f
..
.
~ ~tlarwatlr
"
.
Updated as of 8/15/02
u
F'Lt:
DRAFT ACTION AGENDA
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Thursday, August 15, 2002
9:00 a.m.
Staff Review
9:30 a.m.
Case: FLD2002-060l7 - 700 North Osceola Avenue
Applicant: Dan Gleichowski, U. Dan Mar, Inc.
Representative: Tom Cavanaugh, P.A.C. Land Development Corporation.
Location: 1.1 I-acres site is located on the southwest corner of North Osceola A venue and
Eldridge Street.
Atlas Page: 277B.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the required height of an attached dwelling
within the Downtown District from 50 feet to 81.42 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-903.
Proposed Use: The proposal includes a 28-unit condominium development within a single,
93,672 square foot, six-story building.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Mark Parry, Wayne Wells, Lisa Fierce, Don Melone, Cory Martens, Tom Glenn, Joe
Colbert, Brian Barker, Rick Albee, Glen Bahnick, Garry Brumback, Paul Bertels and Terry Finch
Applicant/Representative: Ed Mazur, Tom Cavanaugh and Barry Bywalec
The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees due prior to issuance of
building permits for 21 additional units. (Residential expansion from 7 apartments to 28
condominium units; crediting existing 7 units) Contact Deb Richter at 562-4817.
2. Traffic engineerine:
a) Should not remove existing parking from the south side of Eldridge Street - modification
by Fire Department (the removal of one space will be acceptable per Paul BertelslFraffic
Engineering);
b) Clarify function of handicap space on north side of Eldridge Street (where is ramp, sign,
etc. ?);
c) Clarify function of area at west end of Eldridge Street on north side (one plan identifies
this area as parking another does not). Designate the area as afire lane with appropriate
signage -IS-minute limit - Loading/Delivery Zone will be acceptable by Traffic
Engineering and Fire Department;
d) Will there be a gate? will use garage door openers
e) Clarify function of "Compactor Space" in "Guest Parking" area;
f) Need a note on the site plan about how the parking and ramp work;
g) "Guest Parking" appears to include a regular parking space inside gated area. Applicant
will modify site plan to correct - shift location of arrow;
DRC agenda - August 15, 2002 - Page 1
.'
.
.
"
h) Guest parking not shown on page four of five on site plans. Applicant stated that there
is, in actuality, no guest parking on that level of parking depicted on sheet four of five;
i) Sight triangle omitted from west side of south garage entrance. Applicant will revise to
show site triangle and indicate a sign on the column which will require vehicles to stop
and watch for pedestrians;
j) How does elevation affect sight distance when exiting south garage entrance?;
k) Show handicap ramp/access to elevator on Levell of parking garage;
I) Items a - k to be addressed prior to review by CDB;
m) Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to e.O.; Corey Martens to
email/fax to applicant
n) Is there to be shared parking with site across the street (removing one on street space and
add to this site for the attached dwellings to the south)? Is there an agreement with the
adjacent property owner?;
0) Clarify gate operation and space requirements for equipment, and vehicle stacking during
activation prior to issuance of any permits. The applicant may eliminate the pedestal
card swipe device and replace with remote control devices.
3. General ene:ineerine::
a) Label gas main on Osceola Avenue. Note #19 says location not shown then what is the
dashed line shown?;
b) Show AD.A ramps for proposed sidewalk along Eldridge Street at drive apron for
parking garage;
c) Show curbside location (staging area) for roll offs (Note #10, Sheet 4 of 5);
d) Need grades for access drive to trash room;
e) Three-point turn doesn't meet the City's Engineering Department Standards and
Specifications (on Eldridge Street). Engineering Department is fine with the three-point
turn as long as Fire is -fire is ok with it because it is better than what there is today;
t) With regards to the drive located on Eldridge Street: Two columns shown in a view
triangle on west side. SEE ITEM 2 G ABOVE FOR CLARIFICATION;
g) Shaded areas shown on Sheet 4 of 5: (a). What are they? (b) Shaded area crosses over
proposed 4' sidewalk. It will be removed from sidewalk and indicated as interior
landscaped areas;
h) Landscape Plan (Sheet LA-I): Loading and drop off area is shown fully landscaped -
plan to be revised eliminated landscaping from drop-off area;
i) All easements required will be due prior to e.O. (Applicant responsible for drawing and
legal descriptions);will be platted as a condo;
j) Clarify the above (3 a - h) prior to review by CDB.
4. Stormwater:
a) General note on drainage sheet: Clarify into which inlet yard drains will tie prior to
review by CDB. (Note #18)
5. Environmental:
a) The swimming pool encroaches within the 25-foot setback from wetlands on the south
side. This encroachment can probably be accommodated if the developer provides an
exotic, nuisance vegetation control and maintenance plan for the balance of the wetland
area, which is highly impacted. The upland and vegetated wetland areas have accreted as
a result of a quiescent area created on the inside corner of two seawalls;
b) The SWFWMD requires that the developer provide treatment for the difference between
pre- and post-development to OFW requirements (3/4 inch); however will allow that
treatment to occur in a vault as proposed;
c) City does not allow vaults for storm water treatment. Much of the stormwater that is
proposed to be treated is from roof runoff; the balance being from driveway and several
parking spaces. However, the two parking levels will be washed down periodically and
that water will enter floor drains and subsequently the storm system. As a compromise I
suggested that he consider routing the roof drains through the proposed vault which will
apparently have a filtration system and easy access and treat the vehicular areas in an
open system or in a system that incorporates replaceable filters that remove sediment,
oils, greases as well as associated metals. Barry indicated that if we could agree to allow
the roof drains to be treated through the vault that he would propose an alternate system
DRC agenda - August 15, 2002 - Page 2
.
.
l
for the vehicular areas including the two parking levels. Stormwater vaults are not
typically acceptable for water quality treatment; need solution for vehicular use area to
get out suspended solids, oil and grease, etc.; applicant was asked to find another way to
design without a vault;
d) All of the above (5 a -c) to be addressed as to the satisfaction of staff; prior to the
issuance of any permits.
6. Plannin2:
a) Clarify what portions of submerged land is owned by the applicant prior to the CDB
review. Applicant has submitted information regarding this;
b) It is still not clear how measure the height of the building - to the midpoint of the peak of
the primary roof or, if the roof is generally flat, to that flat roof; applicant submitted three
different ways to calculated height;
c) An IITF is depicted on the zoning atlas; staff received a faxed copy this week; please
explain what this means;
d) It is not clear how density was calculated. It appears as though the acreage was
inadvertently rounded "up". Staff calculations still indicate a density limit of 27 units.
Clarify what area was used to calculate density prior to the review by the CDB.
Applicant will survey the high water mark again to reevaluate the size of the site;
e) Indicate the number of existing parking spaces.
7. Solid waste:
a) Signify dumpster staging area prior to CDB review. To where will the dumpsters be
pulled? (See comment 3.c. above.
8. Land resource:
a) Remove Hickory north of the building in the drainage swale. Too much impact for this
tree to survive; will remove
b) Revise with the above comment prior to CDB review.
9. Fire:
a) Provide a complete High Rise package, including but not limited to, Fire Pump,
Generator, Standpipe System, Sprinkler System, Fire Alarm System, Fire Control Room,
Fireman's Phone System w/Jacks, Stairwell smoke removal system. Provide prior to the
issuance of any permits;
b) Gates require an approved Emergency Entry System as per Pinellas County Ordinance
98-4. Show on Construction plans prior to the issuance of any permits;
c) Provide a Knox Key Box on building for emergency egress, as per NFPA 1. Show on
Construction Plans prior to the issuance of any permits.
10. Landscavin2:
a) Why is the loading and drop-off area landscaped? Will be addressed by applicant - see
comment 3.h above.
NOTES:
· Send comments to Robert at bbywalec@fldesign.com and Thomas at tlc@paclanddevelopment.com
· 15 sets of everything due August 19,2002 in order to be scheduled for the September 17,2002 CDB
meeting. The packets must include 8.5 by ll-inch, rendered site plans, elevations, landscape plans,
etc. in order to considered complete; please collate each plan set, then staple together to form one
set.
DRAFT CONDITIONS:
1. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
2. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted or as
modified by the CDB;
3. That the density of the site be limited to 25 dwellings units per acre;
4. That all Environmental requirements be addressed prior to the issuance of any permits.
5. That all signage comply with Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DRC agenda - August 15, 2002 - Page 3
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: September 17, 2002
Case Number: FLD2002-06017
Agenda Item: B 1
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
P.A.C Land Development Corporation
LOCA TION:
700 North Osceola Avenue
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to increase the height of a building
with attached dwellings, within the Downtown District, from 50 feet
to 81.42 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project under the provisions of Section 2-903.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by Florida Design Consultants, Inc.
Architectural plans submitted by Morris Architects.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
1.12 acres; 48,788 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: Approximately 118 feet of width by 300 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Attached dwellings
Attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
CDB, Central Business District Classification
(Also governed by the Northwest Periphery Plan)
ZONING DISTRICT:
D, Downtown District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
West: Clearwater Bay
East: Attached dwellings
South: Attached dwellings
FILE
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-060 17 - Page 1
.
.
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Multi- and single-family residential uses dominate the immediate
vicinity. The Seminole boat ramp (a public marina facility) exists to
the north and west of the subject site.
ANALYSIS:
The 1. 12-acre site is located on the northwest comer of Eldridge Street and North Osceola Avenue.
The site, developed in 1946, is located within an older, residential portion of the City located
directly along Clearwater Bay. The site contains two, attached dwellings with a total of seven
residential units. A two-story building, approximately 18 feet in height with approximately 6,000
square feet of area, is located on the north side of the property and contains four dwelling units. A
second, one-story building, approximately 12 feet in height with approximately 2,000 square feet
of area, is located on the south portion of the site and contains three dwelling units. The site has a
steep slope running west/east starting at sea level and rising to 26 feet at North Osceola Avenue;
the average grade is 13 feet. The site is located within the Old Clearwater Bay neighborhood.
One and two-story, multi- and single-family dwellings characterize the neighborhood.
The site is located within the Northwest Periphery Area. The Periphery Plan designates the site for
residential reuse with multi-family townhomes and condominiums and guides land use and
densities in the downtown. Such development should be oriented toward Clearwater Harbor and
implement designs that respect these views. Currently, pedestrian activity is limited due to high
traffic volume, narrow sidewalks and a lack of landscape buffering. New developments are
required to provide a more positive pedestrian experience. The maximum permitted density, under
the provisions of the Northwest Periphery Area, is 25 dwelling units per acre for sites under two
acres, such as this one acre site. The density bonus is intended to encourage the consolidation of
properties. The applicant was unable to consolidate additional property.
The applicant seeks to increase the permitted height of a building with attached dwellings from 50
feet to 81.42 feet. Attached dwellings under the Flexible Development provisions are permitted
to be up to 100 feet in height if they are located south of Drew Street, west of North Myrtle
A venue and north of Court Street. Because this site is north of Drew Street, and the requested
height is greater than 50 feet, this is a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project request. The
proposal includes a 28-unit condominium development within a single, 93,672 square foot, six-
story building. The proposed building will be located approximately nine feet from the side (north
and south) property lines, 25 feet from the front (east) property line along North Osceola Avenue
and 121 feet from the rear (west) property line. The building will be at least 20 feet from any
surrounding structure.
Two levels of under-structure parking will be provided and will include 61 spaces that exceed
Code requirements of 42 spaces. It will include storage space for the residents. The applicant will
also provide three compact car spaces and 10 motorcycle spaces. Access to the site is proposed
along both Osceola A venue and Eldridge Street at two-way, gated entrance/exits. Existing, on-
street parking spaces on the south side of Eldridge Street will remain.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-06017 - Page 2
~
.
.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, terracotta color
barrel tile roof, and a significant number of windows and balconies on all elevations. The roof has
been designed to minimize views of the mechanical equipment and incorporates the use of cupola-
type enclosures. The landscape plan exceeds the requirements of Code. This includes a mixture
of various trees, shrubs, palms and annuals.
Amenities include a swimming pool along the harbor (west side) to be suspended above the
ground on pilings. The swimming pool will encroach within the required 25-foot setback from
wetlands on the west side of the site as regulated by Section 3-907.A. of the Community
Development Code. This encroachment will be mediated through an exotic, nuisance vegetation
control and maintenance plan for the balance of the wetland area and will be approved and
coordinated with Staff prior to the issuance of any permits. In addition, roof drains will be routed
through the proposed stormwater vault which will include a filtration system. A Code-compliant
method of treating paved, vehicular use areas must be provided to satisfy stormwater management
criteria, prior to the issuance of any permits, and the applicant is noticed that this could adversely
impact the site design. As provided in Section 4-406 of the Code, should addressing stormwater
issues result in a site plan which is significantly different from the one approved by the
Community Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to the Board for review. No
new docks are included with this proposal. Any proposed docks will need to meet the
requirements of Code or be reviewed by the Community Development Board.
Fire Department requirements, including a complete High Rise fire suppression and prevention
system, gates with an approved emergency entry system and a knox key box on the building for
emergency egress will need to be shown prior to the issuance of any building permits. A four-foot
sidewalk will be provided along North Osceola A venue and Eldridge Street to enhance pedestrian
access in the area.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE PERIPHERY PLAN:
STANDARD
REQUIRED/
PERMITTED
28 dwelling units
(25 du/ac)
EXISTING
PROPOSED
IN
COMPLIANCE?
dwelling Yes
(25
uni ts
DENSITY
(dwelling units
per acre)
Seven
units
dwelling 28
uni ts
dwelling
er acre)
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 17,2002 - Case FLD2002-06017 - Page 3
.
.
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT (Section 2-903):
Determined by
the Community
Development
Coordinator
based on the
specific use
and/or ITE
Manual standards
* The minimum development standards for attached dwellings are 1 - 1.5 parking spaces per
unit (28 - 42 spaces). The applicant has provided 61 spaces, exceeding the minimum
requirements of Code.
STANDARD
HEIGHT
maximum
PARKING
SPACES
minimum
PERMITTED/ EXISTING
REQUIRED
N/A 12 - 18 feet
PROPOSED
IN
COMPLIANCE?
Yes
81.42 feet
10 spaces
61 spaces
(2.17 spaces per
unit)
Yes*
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL PROJECTS IN THE
DOWNTOWN DISTRICT (Section 2-903.C):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from intensity and development standards.
The maximum height permitted in the Downtown District is 100 feet provided that the
site is located along Clearwater Bay, is south of Drew Street, north of Court Street and
west of Myrtle A venue. The site meets all of these requirements with the exception of
being located 1,600 feet north of Drew Street. The additional height will allow for two
levels of under-structure parking and additional landscaping in excess of Code. Height is
measured from the mean elevation (13 feet) of existing grade. The site slopes steeply
towards Clearwater Bay with a grade differential of 26 feet. The goal of the Northwest
Periphery Area includes the encouragement of higher density, residential development
(primarily west of Osceola Avenue). Such development is encouraged to take the form of
townhomes and condominiums. The only practical way to meet the goals of the
Northwest Periphery Plan is to increase the overall height of the structure. Overall, the
structure, site plan and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown District and
with other projects approved by the CDB (304-308 and 900 North Osceola A venue; FLD
01-06-25 and FLD 00-10-46, respectively).
A portion of the North Osceola Avenue neighborhood is characterized by mid- to high-
rise buildings including a nine-story condominium located a 500 North Osceola Avenue.
Additional upscale residential dwellings are an important component of a healthy mix of
uses in this area. This use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-060 17 - Page 4
.
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties.
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The
current assessed valuation of the site is $407,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the
assessed valuation is projected at $6,000,000. This increase in property value is expected
to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the District.
The City of Clearwater permits attached dwelling uses. The site is currently zoned
Downtown District, and the use is permitted within that classification. In addition, the
Periphery Plan encourages residential uses in this area.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are low- to mid-rise attached dwellings. The adjacent uses to the south and north
include multi-family dwellings within two-story buildings. Two blocks to the south is a
condominium building (Belvedere Apartments) approximately 80 feet in height and
farther to the south, north of Jones Street, is an approximately 115-foot tall building (500
Osceola Avenue; Harbor Bluffs Waterfront Condominium). The proposed condominium
complex is specifically geared to take advantage of the views of the waterfront and
Clearwater Bay. It will aid in the revitalization of the downtown area. This location
provides a unique opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Bay that is currently
underutilized and is consistent with goals of the Northwest Periphery Plan.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses with the
comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
The site is located in a residential area on the edge of central downtown Clearwater. The
site, uniquely located directly on Clearwater Bay, is within easy access to the major
north/south and east/west corridors within the City of Clearwater providing easy access to
and from all parts of the Tampa Bay area. There are no other sites within the City of
Clearwater and the Northwest Periphery Plan area currently available to accommodate the
proposal along the harbor.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The attractive architecture, amenities and landscape design will set a
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-060 17 - Page 5
. .
new standard for the area. It may be a catalytic project that influences other like
redevelopment efforts.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole.
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the downtown.
The proposed development will play an important role in the continuing revitalization of
Downtown Clearwater. The City will benefit by having an attractive building complex
located in a redeveloping area. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape
enhancements, as revised, will significantly improve the site. The current proposal,
similar to the previously approved version, incorporates well-articulated, unified
elevations and coordinated architectural elements.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of urban character within the
Downtown District. The increase in height above the Code provision of 50 feet as
requested is mitigated by the slope of the site. Because of the topography of the site, the
underground parking will not be visible from Osceola A venue.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The minimum requirement for attached dwellings in the Downtown District are between
1 - 1.5 units per dwelling unit (28 to 42 spaces). The applicant is providing over two
spaces per unit (61 spaces total) exceeding the minimum requirements.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, a terra
cotta, barrel tile roof, a significant number of windows and balconies, vertical columns
and flat arches. The terracotta color clay roof tile has been designed to minimize views of
the mechanical equipment and incorporates the use of cupola-type enclosures. The
design of the building complies with the Downtown District design guidelines and is
similar to the previously approved architecture of a condominium project to be located at
304 North Osceola Avenue (Osceola Bay Club).
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-060 17 - Page 6
.
.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 2-903.C): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with modest single-family dwellings and mid-rise attached
dwellings. The City's vision, however, as provided in the Periphery Plan includes a
revitalized, high-density residential area to support downtown businesses. This proposal
includes upscale condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a positive
redevelopment precedent for the area. The additional height will allow for two levels of
under-structure parking and additional landscaping in excess of Code. The goal of the
Northwest Periphery Area includes the encouragement of higher density, residential
development (primarily west of Osceola Avenue). Such development is encouraged to take
the form of townhomes and condominiums. The only practical way to meet the goals of the
Northwest periphery Plan is to increase the overall height of the structure. Overall, the
structure, site plan and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown District and
with other projects approved by the CDB (304-308 and 900 North Osceola A venue; Fill
01-06-25 and FLD 00-10-46, respectively). Several mid- to high-rise buildings characterize
general area. Additional upscale residential dwellings are an important component of a
healthy mix of uses in this area. This use will also stabilize and support other service uses
nearby.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is zoned Downtown District and the proposed development will be in compliance
with that zoning classification. The proposed development will help generate a better mix
of residential uses and encourage the like redevelopment of other sites.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood. The proposal includes parking and
landscaping in excess of Code requirements in addition to other on-site amenities.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will have two ingress/egress points of access, one from Osceola
A venue and a second from Eldridge Street. The proposal includes razing all seven existing
dwelling units and providing 28 replacement units. Vehicle trip generation will not have
any significant impact on affected intersections or roadways, with no reduction in levels of
service on any roads.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-06017 - Page 7
.
.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the community
character of the immediate vicinity, through attractive architecture and well-designed
landscaping.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of a single building with attractive architecture,
well-designed landscaping and abundant parking. There should be no adverse effects
generated by the proposed development.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on July
11 and August 15, 2002. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development approval to increase the required height of an attached dwelling within the
Downtown District from 50 feet to 81.42 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project under the provisions of Section 2-903 for the site at 700 North Osceola A venue, with the
following bases and conditions:
Basis for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The application is consistent with the Northwest Periphery Area in the Periphery Plan.
4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions:
1. That the density of the site be limited to 28 dwellings units (25 dwelling units per acre);
2. That should addressing stormwater issues result in a site plan which is significantly different
from the one approved by the Community Development Board, the site plan must be
resubmitted to the Board for review;
3. That any encroachments into wetlands be mediated through an exotic, nuisance vegetation
control and maintenance plan approved and coordinated with Staff, prior to the issuance of any
permits;
4. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits;
5. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted or
as modified by the CDB; and
6. That all signage comply with Code.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff
Mark T. Parry, Planner
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-060 17 - Page 8
.
.
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-060 17 - Page 9
.
.
Page 1 of2
Wells, Wayne
From: Bill Woods [Billwoods@woodsconsulting.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 6:15 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Re: Osceola Dock
Wayne:
Thanks. I will follow up.
Regards, Bill Woods
----- Original Message -----
From: Wells. Wayne
To: 'Bill Woods'
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 20024:00 PM
Subject: RE: Osceola Dock
Bill-
The attached dwelling project at 700 N. Osceola Avenue was approved by the Community Development Board
(CDB) on Tuesday, September 17, 2002, with conditions. I would note that there is an appeal timeframe that
ends on October 1, 2002. As for the status of the dock review, it is still here on hold with John Schodtler.
Please submit the revised plans that show how the proposed dock interfaces with the proposed upland
development (site improvements). Please note that the dock cannot be approved until permits for the upland
improvements are issued. I cannot tell you of the status of the project's construction documents or when they
will be submitted for review and permitting.
Should you have any additional questions, feel free to call or write.
Wayne Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Woods [mailto:Billwoods@woodsconsulting.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 20028:09 AM
To: wwells@c1earwater-f1.com
Subject: Osceola Dock
Dear Wayne:
Re: Osceola Avenue Multi-Use Dock
I spoke with John at the Counter earlier this week and asked the status of the multi-use
(less than 500 sf) dock proposed for 700 Osceola Drive Avenue in Clearwater. We
submitted the dock plan and subsequently was informed by John that the terminus of
the dock on the uplands interfered with the placement of the pool. We have modified
the terminus to correct the problem. I did not resubmit a plan as it was my opinion that
you were only addressing the portion of dock over wetlands/surface waters. Given the
above, please advise the following:
Do you need a resubmittal?
What is the status of the dock review?
What is the status of the approval of the upland development (as John states you
9/2012002
,
.
.
Page 2 of2
cannot approve the dock until the upland is approved).
I appreciate your assistance.
My regards, Bill Woods
Woods Consulting
9/20/2002
.
.
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 20024:00 PM
To: 'Bill Woods'
Subject: RE: Osceola Dock
Bill -
The attached dwelling project at 700 N. Osceola Avenue was approved by the Community Development Board
(CDB) on Tuesday, September 17,2002, with conditions. I would note. that there is an appeal timeframe that
ends on October 1, 2002. As for the status of the dock review, it is still here on hold with John Schodtler. Please
submit the revised plans that show how the proposed dock interfaces with the proposed upland development (site
improvements). Please note that the dock cannot be approved until permits for the upland improvements are
issued. I cannot tell you of the status of the project's construction documents or when they will be submitted for
review and permitting.
Should you have any additional questions, feel free to call or write.
Wayne Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Woods [mailto:Billwoods@woodsconsulting.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 8:09 AM
To: wwells@c1earwater-f1.com
Subject: Osceola Dock
Dear Wayne:
Re: Osceola Avenue Multi-Use Dock
I spoke with John at the Counter earlier this week and asked the status of the multi-use
(less than 500 sf) dock proposed for 700 Osceola Drive Avenue in Clearwater. We
submitted the dock plan and subsequently was informed by John that the terminus of the
dock on the uplands interfered with the placement of the pool. We have modified the
terminus to correct the problem. I did not resubmit a plan as it was my opinion that you
were only addressing the portion of dock over wetlands/surface waters. Given the
above, please advise the following:
Do you need a resubmittal?
What is the status of the dock review?
What is the status of the approval of the upland development (as John states you
cannot approve the dock until the upland is approved).
I appreciate your assistance.
My regards, Bill Woods
Woods Consulting
10/2/2002
,.
.
.
Woods. Consulting
Environmental Permitting Marine Engineering Land Planning
September 25,2002
322 Ridge Road
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
Wayne Wells, Senior Planner
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Re: Proposed Bayview Docks
700 Osceola Avenue
Dear Wayne:
As a followup to our discussion, please find enclosed a replacement sheet 2 of the plans and 7 copies
for the proposed Bayview Docks to be located at 700 North Osceola Avenue in Clearwater. The plan
change is to revise the termination of the boardwalk on the uplands to properly interface with the
architectural plans.
As we discussed by telephone, we would like to move forward to permit the docks with Pinellas County
but cannot do so until the City agrees to sign off on the County permit forms. It is our understanding that
the COB signed off on the upland improvements on 9/17 and the appeal period is over on October 1. Can
the City sign off at this time on the County permit application with a condition that the dock cannot be
constructed until all upland permits are in hand.
Please advise as we would like to initiate the county permit review.
Bill Woods
Woods Consulting
,
, .
, I
! 'f~<, ,:
\ "d
,f I j ',~ -, ~ .
)11U',l ,);
f'''; l
f ~.'~."
\ PLAN:-!
" r.,',
f-.~~',_,~":
cc: Tom Cavanaugh
C:\Projects\Cavanaugh Multi-use Dock (053-02)\Cavanaugh Dock 16 Clearwater Permit Resubmittal.wpd
Office: (727) 786-5747 Fax: (727) 786-7479 Email: billwoods@woodsconsulting.org
..
MULTI-USE DOCe
SCALE: 1 "=30'
-~~
+0,2 ~
~-==---
--------=:_--:::::::::::::::::.~ ~
+0.3 ~~~~
! ~--==--
APPIiC. #
(OFFICAL USE ONLY)
'"
..
II
o
..
x 0.9
K 1.7
I 3.5
JO.eoj itji(I:..C;,( lliJNAL U(~E AS
/-"-""''''--';:'d1 r:l.\':...-.:d:,'::' (JE::'t\-~j~ t.'~~'i~Sdt -..'.....;,jl.:~
+-0,3
FIELD LOCA TEO "'EAN
HIGH WATER LEVEL-~
+ ""'-,
0.1 '"",
91.'
AliO AREA AllOm S'( ""CCERTATION
;< 4.0
.~~
...... 9'
...+ 'lP....+
..
r3'~
5' . 5' Pl." WORN
wi STEP
x 3.1
x 2.6
).;. <.9
.
~22,6
.
H"TCHED -'REA
- 496 SOU-'RE FEET
...
:8
.
7.5'
(~ OF PROPERTY WIDTH)
---.
"$"
~4.J
/V~
~f rf
.0.J~ I'
C\j ~l'
+-1.5
x 1.2
II i
//
1/
x/2.7
if
I,;
/f
2
/f-
(i~b
,
.,
j6'~7.
54.3'
('~lN~~
x 0.8
'\
'1'
+
+-1.6
x +rOp ~
I . ~ 1.9 .., UOI'~
PROPOSED DOCK SLIP & PWC LIFT AREA
SA YVIEW DOCKS
NOTE: DEPTHS SHOWN ARE
RELATIVE TO MLW
TOTAL SQUARE FEET
WA TERWA Y WIDTH
WA TERFRONT WIDTH
MHW +1,3 MLW
496
>5000 FEET
163 FEET
- 05
SHEET -L
WOODS CONSULTING
322 RIDGE ROAD
PALM HARBOR, FL 34683
PH. (727) 786-5747 FAX (727) 786-7479
SHOREUNE
Water and Navigation Approval
Engineer s Seal
R1CHARO W"SlLEWSl<I, P .E.
1~20 CH"TEAU.ooD ORlIIE
CLEAAWTER, FUJRIOA 33764
1tl: (727) !IIIO-4J41 F'1ioX: (72"1) ~-37iO
~
NORTH
1"=200'
Aerial Map
.1:1 .Dall11I:J1; Inc.
7001Vortl1 Osceola A venue
FLD 2002-06017
.~...
.~."
~ -
I
~"
I~-'A~ CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
iO~\
\~;J PUBIJC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
\.~ .;p ENGINEERING
.,,,,,,,,,,
Iii
~ ~ "'"
~.,,~~
it L
~
NORTH
1"=1320'
Location Map
J:f. Dan M31; Inc.
700 North Osceola A venue
FLD 2002-06017
PROJECT
SITE
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
1
~
ST
'!;'
<{
w
>
<{
R
1,1'1'0."""........
"'~9~~--~
/O'M~""
\ ,d,,, , ...
%g - - 6~
\~.\ -, '.9:'/
~,J" 'f"->'j'\
--.............~,;ljl'l
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERING
------
ELDRIDGE
TOWNHOUSE
60-87
I.I.F. No. 17,533
G
3
4
L
I.I.F. No. 17,646
I.I.F. No. 17,491 GOVT LOT 3
----
GOVT LOT 4
5
6
HARRINGTON 512
11 5-77
12
507
8
510
I.I.F. No. 17,494
7 510
505
2 & [1]
3 SLO N
7
---~----
5
508
506
4
, 504
HARBOR BLUFFS
WATERFRONT
CONDO
21-31
6506
505
3
I.I.F. No. 17,493
503 4 1 38 5
HARTS I g: 2ND
501 2 'f 1
500
502
2
500
>
c;,
5 -
03
611'""
609
34
33
,~
vL
601 3
0
'"
513
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST
OWNER: J.J. Dan Mar, Inc. CASE: FLD 2002- 06017
SITE: 700 North Osceola Avenue I PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES): 1.11
, PIN: 9/29/15/00000/420/0400
j
~ A T~i~: 2778 .'
! ,~~~ : .., ;...
w
---
GOVT LOT 3
----
GOVT LOT 4
STREET
25 36
'5
34
33
32
31
9
2 8
5 3 7
6
4 5 16
2 1 2 1
--------
---------
--~-----
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES
OWNER: J.J. Dan Mar, Inc. CASE: FLD 2002- 06017
: SITE: 700 North Osceola Avenue I PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES): 1.11
I
i PIN: 9/29/15/00000/420/0400
~ ATLAS 2778
~ PAGE:
w
View looking northeast from west side of property
':."....... _..,',:'~...o.-r"..~;. . " "
~......"..--r-_t:.:'-'.=---'.. . .....'...'.;..,...r.....=..,...._..,. ......'.......... ..... .......... ... ..' ... .-.. ...... ......
::i,._i~ ,,~.'
-,'", ," 'tl;/...'~
View looking west from west side of property
View looking north from west side of property
700 North Osceola Avenue
FLD2002..060 17
View looking northwest from west side of property
View looking east from west side of property
View looking south from west side of property
View looking west from east side of property
View looking west from east side of property
View looking west from east side of property
700 North Osceola Avenue
FLD2002-060 17
W~':_~::JFi:~;.1~i
View looking east from middle of property
View looking west from center of property
View looking west from west side of property
Surrounding area
Surrounding area
Surrounding area
;~~J1t~~~la Avenue
Surrounding area
Surrounding area
Surrounding area
Surrounding area
Surrounding area
Surrounding area
700 North Osceola Avenue
FLD2002-060 17
Surrounding area
Surrounding area
Surrounding area
.
.
~ 3-904
MQ ov-Ic- -
'9. r e... 7'00 rI- Dscta /11... -
, . _ \ .. ,.~.;,,..... ,..\\O'\-J
~ c..o.,......... ~'~~ ~
~ cL r 4.VT ~r1:lIkt.-~~-\-.1'(\.d.J2l"
. . Ate~. wvJ
authorIty of the CIty and the county constructIOn
licensing board pursuant to Chapter 47 and the
city pursuant to Chapter 46. This section shall be
administered according to the following require-
ments:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
exceeding 36 inches, in the 45 angle formed by ten
feet back from the property line on the water and
along the side property line.
NO STRUCTURE OR LANDSCAPING MAY BE
INSTALLED, OTHER THAN NON-OPAOUE FENCE
NOT EXCEEDING 36"IN HEIGHT 1
1-':-:-:) -. -' -, -, -. -, -, -, - '10')' -, -'~
:./~, ............._._____.m.._____.n...n___ ..___.__.. '
l\.(J m., i
. , ,
i ! I
! i i
! STRUCTURE ! i
i !10'!
! ~
I .1 ! i
/. 'l(.-') (:"L~i '
.'Y"v t..-n i
ty~:.=:-=:-=.,.=:.=:.=:.=:-=.,.=:-i~]:~~::. .-- '
r
45 DEGREE TRIANGLE
(Ord. No. 6526-00, ~ 1, 6-15-00)
WATER
Section 3-905. Coastal construction control
line.
A. Purpose. This section establishes within the
city the coastal construction control line as the
line of reference from which setbacks shall be
measured along the Gulf of Mexico for buildings
and structures pursuant to F.S. ~ 161.053 in order
to protect the safety, economic, environmental,
recreational and community appearance objec-
tives of the city.
B. Required setback. No building or structure
shall be located seaward of the coastal construc-
tion control line unless approved by the State of
Florida.
C. Interpretation. Nothing contained in this
section shall be construed to conflict with or
supersede the authority of the state in regard to
establishing the location or relocation of the coastal
construction control line, or any waiver or vari-
ance to the requirements relative thereto pursu-
ant to F.8. ch. 161, or the requirements and
Supp. No.1
1. Compliance with the provisions of this
development code shall be independent of
any action or authority of the State of
Florida pursuant to Ch. 161 F.S. and no
action by the state shall relieve any per-
son from compliance with the require-
ments of this development code.
2. Seawalls shall not be governed by the
required setback identified in this section.
3. Any request to modify the setback require-
ments contained in this section shall be
considered as an application for a level
two approval as provided for in Article 4
Division 4.
Section 3-906. Scenic setbacks.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this
development code, the following setbacks shall
apply to development adjacent to the east side of
Bayshore Boulevard so that views of Old Tampa
Bay are not unreasonably obstructed or dimin-
ished from Bayshore Boulevard:
A. No wall or fence in excess of three feet in
height shall be permitted.
B. Hedges or other groupings of shrubs shall
be planted and maintained at a height of
three feet or less.
Section 3-907. Vegetative buffer adjacent to
preservation district or juris-
dictional wetlands.
A. A vegetative buffer shall be provided on all
lands within 25 feet of any property designated on
the zoning atlas as preservation (P), or any prop-
erty determined to be wetlands under the juris-
diction of the State of Florida ('Jurisdictional
wetlands"); and all lands within 15 feet of the top
of the bank of any creeks, channels, or related
waterways which contain jurisdictional wetlands.
This requirement shall not apply to existing sea-
walls or other structures creating an abrupt tran-
sition between any such property and the adjoin-
CD3:28
"f! 4"
.
)0
.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
ing upland property. "Top of the bank" is that
point on the slope at which the side slope becomes
flatter than one foot vertical to four feet horizon-
tal.
B. The required buffer width may be reduced
by not more than one-third in a portion of the
buffer, by providing additional width in another
portion of the buffer which will result in an
equivalent or greater square footage of cumula-
tive buffer area.
C. No structure or other surface impervious to
water shall be permitted within the vegetative
buffer, with the exception of structures which
would be allowed as a part of a level one or level
two approval within the preservation district.
D. Within the vegetative buffer, any native
vegetation shall be protected so that the buffer
will retain the character of the immediately adja-
cent vegetation within the preservation district.
Native vegetation within the buffer shall not be
removed or altered unless the removal or alter-
ation of the vegetation will not adversely affect
the hydrological or ecological integrity of the
adjacent wetland. All prohibited trees existing
within the buffer shall be removed by the land-
owner and shall be prevented from re-emergence.
This subsection shall not be construed to prohibit
routine maintenance trimming of nonwetland veg-
etation in accordance with procedures developed
by the city manager.
E. If prior to October 4, 1990, the native veg-
etation within a vegetative buffer has been re-
moved or altered, the owner shall not be required
Supp. No. Ii
~ 3-908
to restore the vegetation to its natural state. The
owner shall not, however, impede the natural
succession of native vegetation into the buffer.
EXTERIOR PlANTER
NOTlOEXCEED40 ~
OF sETBACK OR 10',
WHICHEVER IS LESS
exterior planter setback
(Ord. No. 6526-00, ~ 1, 6-15-00)
Section 3-908. Permitted encroachments
into setbacks and over street
rights-of-way.
Certain building and other projections shall be
permitted to extend into setback areas and may
be permitted to encroach over street rights-of-way
as follows:
A. Building projections which are affixed
solely to the building and not directly
affixed to the ground such as building
fascias, canopies other than freestanding
canopies, awnings, marquees, and other
similar projections, shall be permitted to
project into required setbacks as specified
below.
1. In the Tourist, Commercial and
Downtown Districts, such projec-
CD3:29
.
Wl-e-
11 :30 a.m.
Case: FLD2002-06017- 700 North Osceola Avenue.
OwnerlApplicant: Dan Gleichowski, J.1. Dan Mar, Inc.
Representative: Tom Cavanaugh, P.A.C. Land Development Corp.
Location: The 1. ll-acre site is located on the southwest corner of North Osceola Avenue and
Eldridge Street.
Atlas Page: 277B.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the required height of an attached dwelling
within the Downtown District from 50 feet to . feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-903.
Proposed Use: The proposal includes a II-unit condominium development within a single, ~
square foot, six-story building.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Lisa Fierce, Debbie Richter, Mark Parry, Bob Maran, Cory Martens, Tom Glenn, Don
Melone, Wayne Wells, Paul Bertels, Terry Finch and Joe Colbert
ApplicantJRepresentative: Tom Cavanaugh, Robert Pergolizzi, Blake Plumley and Barry
B ywaler
The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees due prior to issuance of
building permits for 21 additional units. (Residential expansion from 7 apartments to 28
condominium units; crediting existing 7 units) Contact Deb Richter at 562-4817.
2. Stormwater:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity, Staff mayor may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB
3. Traffic ene:ineerine::
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity, Staff mayor may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB.
b) There are five motorcycle spots shown. These spots don't count as part of required
parking (1-1.5 per unit required = 28 spaces minimum if that is the number of units
proposed - see planning comments for density).
c) Revise site plan to show dimensions of all parking spaces, loading areas, fire lanes, drive
aisles, columns and column spacings;
d) No dimensions are shown for space labeled "C" - show dimensions. No credit for
compact spaces.
e) All spaces must be a minimum of 19 feet in length - along the west end - some are shown
at 16 feet - clarify.
f) A minimum of nine feet in width is required for all parking spaces. Additional width
may be necessary where columns or walls may impede maneuverability or vision (3-1402
A). The site plan needs to show dimensioning for all columns and column spacing. The
columns cannot encroach upon the parking space.
g) There are three parking spaces shown on Eldridge Street which back out into the right-of-
way. These are not permissible and need to be removed (3-1402 C).
h) Need large-scale plans of parking levels - can't read 8 Y2 by 11 submittal. It's not clear
how Level One and Level Two parking areas work - Revise plans to clarify.
i) The two spaces at the entrance along Osceola A venue are unsafe and need to be removed.
DRC Action Agenda - July 12, 2002 - page 7
.
.
j) Existing on street parking along south side of Eldridge St. must remain for the entire
length of the street.
k) It is unclear how circle and surrounding areas are intended to be used - clarify;
1) Indicate where any gates will be located and provide adequate stacking spaces;
m) Need a minimum of two car lengths or 40 feet from edge of pavement of the public
roadway;
n) All of the above (3 a - m) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25,2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC.
4. General eneineerine:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
b) Eldridge Street will have to meet City of Clearwater standards;
c) A sidewalk four feet in width will be required along all right-of-ways;
d) Clarify the use of brick pavers in the right-of-way;
e) The cul-de-sac shown doesn't meet City of Clearwater standards;
f) There are shaded interior landscape areas shown in the right-of-way. Revise to show
them completely within the confines of the property;
g) A drop curb will be required at all proposed drive aprons;
h) There is a two-inch gas main along Osceola Avenue that is not shown on the drawings.
Revise the site plan to show that gas main;
i) ADA compliant sidewalk ramps are required at the intersection of Osceola A venue and
Eldridge Street.
j) Need to core the existing sanitary sewer manhole for sewer connections prior to the
issuance of any permits;
k) All of the above (4 a - i) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC
5. Buildine:
a) Indicate the transition line from X to AE flood zone;
b) Construction within 18 feet of existing seawall not permitted; would need to reconstruct
the seawall which would mean there would be work within the jurisdictional area _
would need to secure permits through DEP;
c) All of the above (5 a - b) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC
6. Plannine:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
b) Need large scale plans of parking levels - cannot read 8 Y2 by 11;
c) Clarify the number of units proposed for the site - 1.11 acres will support 27 dwelling
units where 28 are proposed. Either the site has to grow or the number of units needs to
decrease - revise application;
d) The parking requirement is based on the number of units - see above comment - need
minimum of 27 spaces that are meeting all dimensional standards - unclear if this is met;
e) Clarify how the proposed height was calculated, need all details about measurements on
the plans;
f) It is not clear how the proposed height, bulk is in keeping with adjacent properties - see
General Applicability criteria - clarify;
g) What is the existing and proposed valuation?
h) State how will the proposal not affect the health and safety of surrounding properties;
i) Show more detail on architectural plans, what type of relief is proposed - five feet?
j) Provide separate plans for utilities, drainage and landscaping.
DRC Action Agenda - July 12, 2002 - page 8
.
.
k) Have neighbors been notified? Old Clearwater Bay neighborhood association should be
contacted by the applicant as soon as possible to get comments;
1) Revise the site plan to eliminate all use of chainlink fencing;
m) Clarify that the area to the west of the site is not wetlands under the jurisdiction of the
State of Florida. If it is, a 25 foot setback will be necessary;
n) Need periphery Plan goals/objectives discussed in written format - how are they being
met?
0) All required site triangles must be met - 20 foot by 20 foot from the back of pavement for
all driveways, curb cuts, etc. Site plans to be revised prior to next DRC review;
p) All of the above (6 a - p) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25,2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC
7. Solid waste:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff may or may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
b) Clarify how solid waste containers will be moved out to the street to service - a curb cut
may be necessary;
c) All of the above (7 a - b) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC
8. Land resource:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
b) Two trees missing from tree survey, resubmit with corrections.
c) Show all trees on the Site Plan.
d) All of the above (8 a - c) need to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC.
9. Fire:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff mayor may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
b) Need to provide a fire lane 20 feet in width. If Eldridge Street is to be used as the fire
lane, it must be widened to a total of 30 feet (back of curb to back of curb). Any
widening and/or use of the street as a fire lane must not effect parking on the south side
of the street. The widening and use of the fire lane may impact the proposed loading
zone;
c) Provide a fire hydrant on Eldridge Street and locate the Fire Department Connection
within 40 feet of the hydrant and at least 15 feet from the building;
d) Provide an approved turnaround for Fire Apparatus as per NFPA 1, Section 3-5.2
e) Provide a complete High Rise package, including but not limited to, Fire Pump,
Generator, Standpipe System, Sprinkler System, Fire Alarm System, Fire Control Room,
Fireman's Phone System w/Jacks, Stairwell smoke removal system. Provide prior to the
issuance of any permits;
t) Gates require an approved Emergency Entry System as per Pinellas County Ordinance
98-4. Show on Construction plans prior to the issuance of any permits;
g) Provide a Knox Key Box on building for emergency egress, as per NFP A 1. Show on
Construction Plans prior to the issuance of any permits;
h) All of the above (8 a -d) to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC
i) All of the above (8 e - g) to be provided prior to the issuance of any permits.
DRC Action Agenda - July 12,2002 - page 9
.
.
10. Landscapine:
a) The landscape plan looks like it's still in its early stages. It just doesn't feel like it's
hanging together yet. Bottlebrush trees are probably small for a 100-foot tall building.
Utilize living groundcover instead of all the mulch along the north property line. Address
as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002
which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC;
11. Environmental:
a) The site plan is not readable due to the amount of information provided on one sheet.
Separate out existing, proposed, grading, landscaping, demolition plan, flood zone, etc.
on separate sheets. After revisions for clarity Staff may or may not have additional
comments or changed comments. The revised site plans will need to be re-reviewed by
the DRC prior to review by the CDB;
b) The swimming pool encroaches within the 25-foot setback from wetlands on the south
side. This encroachment can probably be accommodated if the developer provides an
exotic, nuisance vegetation control and maintenance plan for the balance of the wetland
area, which is highly impacted. The upland and vegetated wetland areas have accreted as
a result of acquiescent area created on the inside corner of two seawalls;
c) The SWFWMD requires that the developer provide treatment for the difference between
pre and post development to OFW requirements (3/4 inch); however will allow that
treatment to occur in a vault as proposed;
d) City does not allow vaults for stormwater treatment. Much of the storm water that is
proposed to be treated is from roof runoff; the balance being from driveway and several
parking spaces. However, the two parking levels will be washed down periodically and
that water will enter floor drains and subsequently the storm system. As a compromise I
suggested that he consider routing the roof drains through the proposed vault which will
apparently have a filtration system and easy access and treat the vehicular areas in an
open system or in a system that incorporates replaceable filters that remove sediment,
oils, greases as well as associated metals. Barry indicated that if we could agree to allow
the roof drains to be treated through the vault that he would propose an alternate system
for the vehicular areas including the two parking levels. Stormwater vaults are not
acceptable for water quality treatment; need solution for vehicular use area to get out
suspended solids, oil and grease, etc.; could put roof drains through vault;
e) There are disturbed wetlands here;
t) Need to delineate wetland line on the plans (all sheets) so they are legible;
g) All of the above (11 a -t) to be addressed as part of a resubmittal for the next DRC
review. The next deadline is July 25, 2002 which will result in an August 15,2002 DRC
NOTES:
· The applicant may have to ask the State Fire Marshall's office to reduce or eliminate the required
turnaround for fire vehicles. Various solutions were offered by Staff including a hammerhead;
· Applicant intends to remove the existing seawall - coordinate through SWFMD and the City of
Clearwater;
· Applicant intends to submit a new survey showing that the site is now 1.12 acres which will allow 28
units;
· Applicant stated that there is no chainlink fencing on their site - any CL fencing is on neighboring
properties;
· Applicant stated that mean elevation is 13.5 feet and that flood zone is 12.5 feet. The applicant will
resubmit revised elevations showing how the height was calculated.
· Send comments to Robert at rpergolizzi@fldesign.com and Thomas at tlc@paclanddevelopment.com
DRC Action Agenda - July 12, 2002 - page 10
..
.
&c. Side and rear setbacks. Chainlink fences located in a side or rear yard shall not
exceed forty-eight (48) inches or six (6) feet if clad with green or black vinyl. If
such side or rear yard is adjacent to a public right-of-way, however, such
chainlink fence shall not be permitted.
GD. Landscaping requirements. Chainlink fences which are not otherwise required
to be landscaped by Article 3 Division 12 shall be landscaped with a continuous
hedge or a nondeciduous robust growing vine at frequent intervals. Such
landscaping may be located on the external or internal side of the fence along the
entire length of the fence.
l*E. Public or private recreational facilities. Chainlink fences for public or private
tennis courts, golf courses and driving ranges, athletic fields, play courts, batting
cages and other similar uses are exempt from height regulations contained in this
section and the location restriction of 3-805W ill.) above.
* * * *
Section 47. Article 3. Division 9. General Applicability Standards. Section 3-902.
Comprehensive plan densitieslintensities is hereby amended by adding the following subsection:
D. When calculating the lot area and/or densitvlintensitv of a property, the total of
either number shall not be rounded UP to the next whole number.
ec IOn ArtIC e . Division 9. General Applicability Standards. Section 3-904. Sight
visibility triangle is hereby amended by deleting sight triangle (arterials and collectors) diagram, and
deleting street and driveway title name on diagram. Deleting 10' from pavement edge or roadway (if no
sidewalk). Deleting 5' from back of sidewalk, and renaming right-of-way and driveways and inserting
new diagram that requires a 20 feet setback from the edge of the property line pursuant to Exhibit A~
~
Section 49. Article 3. Division 9. General Applicability Standards. Section 3-908. Permitted
encroachments into setbacks and over street rights-of-ways is hereby amended as follows:
* * * *
A. Building projections which are affixed solely to the building and not directly affixed
to the ground such as building fascias, roof overhangs, eaves, canopies other than
freestanding canopies, awnings, marques, and other similar projections, shall be
permitted to project into required setbacks as specified below.
****
Section 49A. Article 3. Division 9. General Applicability Standards. Section 3-908. Permitted
encroachments into setbacks and over street rights-of-ways is hereby amended as follows:
* * * *
D. Balconies, decks, bay windows, and similar features that linearly extend 50 percent or
less of the width of the building wall to which they are attached shall be permitted to
extend into a required set back area not more that W 24 inches provided that through
access is not obstructed.
31
Ordinance No. 6928-02
. .
.
.
[ SIGHT TRIANGLE I
RIGHTS-OF- WAY and DRIVEWAYS
I 20' from property line I
[ .
Exhibit A - Sight Visibility Triangle
ctc ~ ab 'f(z, UlU'U{__ ft~
CJ;~ * ~ {AkAvda-rv u-h~
~ .~t {teL 11. [I!~
J1'?favuv~ !6 ~ (pL
ViM 7J h&rh J~deJ~
~ ve)u~ t~
. Cld"C,lecu...,uCLkr-. ~ N€\5~occi Ass{)c.
Row I ClYId. M I b..W\. .
I"8LJtf Vene..+)CLn P6;f\+ r:0r.
C\ eO"V-u.::cL.+e....) ~ L3 "37 5S
CLEARWATER GARDEN CLUB
405 SEt"jlt",,!C)LE; ST
Cl."E:{iRI/.,1I~:) TEF~ r=L,
3:3"'l !.::'':;I :3f3(~()
RICHARDSON. ROBERT R
RICHARDSON. DEBORAH A
700 N GARDEN AVE
CL.EI~F~II>)I'~ITEh~ FL_
::::; :3 '7 5 :::. ~5 :~~~ :;~~ [~3
C:L.EI~F.~\I.)() TEh~ "
PO t30)< 47 ,j
CL[I~r:'l "1TE:F.~ FL
D(4Ni"jl~~r.::.:. ,} .] I j~C
670 ISLAND WAY ~ 600
c:.: L. E () r-~ 1..1) () 'T E: R FL.,
,/
:::~; ?5 ~ll~~ ~?
I)E:C(lDE: 80 :X: 1"'/
250 PATRICK BLVD STE 140
r:3R()()f<:I~':;' I EL.D 1,....1 I
.~s ~5 () 4 .~S .5 ~3 ~Z (:)
801 N FORT HARRISON INC
645 E DANIA BEACH BLVD
DAi"',!I(~ FL
~:s :3 () () (~l ::5 f) J... ~3
RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY
~:>EF;~\lICES INC
1855 HIGHLAND AVE S
CL.E(')RI,.\I(~'rER FL,
:)~57 !::.(S,
PACE TECH PROPERTIES INC
2035 PHILIPPE PKWY
SAFETY HARBOR FL
~:5 ~l (:~ '9 .~::I :;? ~2~ () ()
'::L. I H I C: I ~,jC::
"SOH () \l[
:3 ;:) '7 6 (-1 l~:~ I~~I ~3 ~2
1^IC)OI'{,S" R()j,j()L.D
,1.7~39 FI.)L.TOt",,! ()VE:
CL_E(~RIN(>ITER FL"
;~~3'? 5!.S ~Lf3:2()
P.A,c. LcmJ De~elopyY\~+ Corp.
'\OM e ClJCV)a\J~~
oJ.
1~o Bot'\ \'\ \ e r-o...e 2:)1-
LU'~^-\-eV" PcA.rk ) f="L 3d./[cr
7en'lI CJ~..~
FLO 2co~ - ~J7 ~D~ 9-f7-6:J.
15;)., L6J 1<, HoA, gF)
Tr'::':IHIGH COI:'::':F'
190<4 DHE:li.) ST
CL_E(4F~I/\I(~TE:h~ F'L
::s ::3 ~l (. .5 ,:5 () 2 :5
C: L. [: (~ Fi '..1) ()T E f;!, ,. C I -, 'y" ... ,....
112 S OSCEO ; AVE
IJ[) 1:30>( "/ .,:1;3
F'L.
JOHD(~C T i."IC~
C/O THE GOLDEH GRIDDLE CORP
10 ALLLSTATE PKWY
r'1 (i F;~ f<. H () t"l
C{iN(\D(~
C) t....! J....~ ::$ f:':~ .5 F) ;3
SCI FUNERAL SERV FLA THC
C/O SCI MANAGEMEHT CORP
PROPERTY TAX DEPT 8TH FLOOR
F' 0 BO>< 1:?;0548
TTa I q ~ 05 L[-'g'
HOUSTONfX
AL.L_CH" FREf) :<.
IJO E;OX 275
C L._ E~ (l R v.! I;~ T E l~ I::: 1_.
:~5 ~:s 'X .~:, '7 () :? ~7 E;
F~ I \iER,c'", hi I CCJL..(',:3
R I \lCr-~()" LET I C I (~l
2405 SILVER FORREST
L.UTZ ::'L.
~3 ::; ~5 .:::t..:) ~5 ~? ~~) ~~~;
SIDDIQI. IRSHAD A
SIDDIQI. ARLENE: S
507 H FORT HARRISOH AVE
[:L. E:P,R 1/',1 (.) 'rcl::;~ F L_
3 3 ~7 ~) !5 :5 '~) () l~~)
CLEARWATER FRCE CLIHIC IHC
707 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLE:ARI/'!I~TE:R FL
:3; ?:; 7 .~S .~~t :~:s ~:3 ~2 :5
TAGARAS" GEORGE V
1~3()J. L()I.Jf;'iEt..,!C:E CT
CL.E()HI/'!I(~TEF< F'L
:3 :5 ~7 6. ~~. I~~;' )~:;. i3 ~2
HCIOK~;" F<C)j'~()L.[)
104 (?, F.~ A ,".IT ~;::r
CL.[()f~I....,1("iTEF~~ FL
2) 2~; ~7 .:'~l .~~l :? ~::I (;. :5
(>, \l E
:5 3 ~7 ':'~l ::)
FI'!!'" c~
'f I Lt:.
.
.
r'j(--'lDE:RO ,. t1!:)F~ I I~~ :=;1
GONZALEZ. LIDIA M
500 N OSCE:OLA AVE: # 809
CI_E~~h~,^I(.'>tTER I:::L
C()Tt~. .JF~F:'FEr~V I)
C:;OT(). Pf.'>tTRIC;I() L.
3<1,1.0 Ht~f~GEf~~ CT
~::; (:~ C R!'>t "1 E: 1""! T 0 C {;~
?5 ~S '7 .~) ~, ~) (91. .~,
~) !) [) :2 .1 Z5 '-/1. ._/
BOLGE:R, E:LEANOR H
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 811
CLE()RII>,I(--'lTEF~ F:::L,
JEj,..,J,SEt..,!. CR~'>t I G C:
.J E 1"! ~3 E 1'..1" S I'") L L_ ,,{ r,~
4245 r-jE:S(-~ \i I STt'l
L(-~ C(>lt'~()D{'i C(~
00030
rr;~E:
TRE
DR
~3 ::5 7 !.S 5 ::; f)1 1 ~~I
HOPP. DAGMAR TRE
BLANKERTZ. ROLF TRE
C/O ROLAND REALTV
41 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLE('>:I~I,,'JI~TER Fl.. 33755- '+Oi~
V I (:\".J,NI~. jvj('iNIJEL F':
V' I (~,"11"'!(>I. KAT I (.'1 F
32 CL.IF'TOt',.,! ~)T
[3 E L. ,"'j CI f',! T 1"'j {)
() ~:? 4 "7 ;~:~ ?;; :5 (:~ ~S
LOEHWING. RUDI C
LOEHWING. CLAIRE
1094:5 IRr1(~ (-~\iIE
TI..J.JUHG,(:) C(~
91042:1,229
(~i"J,Df~U;3. 8F~ I (~i"! L.
(~ j"..,! D R LJ S" DO t'J. t..,] A
500 N OSCEOLA AVE PH-E
c:: L E (~F,~ll'){~ T E R F::: L.
:5 ;::; ~r El E.
DI~:'I Y E; (~:<'" t"j I C 1.1 (~E L.
4515 OCEAH VIEW DLVD # 305
L.A C(~N(;)D(-~ C:A
000:50
r ILL. E: ~:,,' F~ C) i",j
T I L.LES ,. f<., I ,"i
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # PHG
Cl,E(~F~(I,)P1Tr::R FL
:5 ~5 7' .~~, ~:I :~~; .S) .4 ~?
MORSE" DAVID G TRE
MORSE. CAROL L TRE
11450 RUGGIERO AVE
LAKE VIEW TERRACE CA
91:542 (:,73;5
DATTAGLINI, ADRIANO
406 \iENET T ('It''1 Dh~
CI_E:I''>tRI,O)()T'E::R FL,
::;2)7':::,~, ~1'? !S()
HARRIS. STEPHEN W
HARRIS" SHERRY R
1963 EDGE WATER DR
C 1_. r:: {;\ I~ \1,1 {i T E: R FL.
IMMERSITE NE:TWORK INC
504 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CL.Cf~::?ll')(\Tr::r~~ FL,
:5 ZS "7 5 .~:::l
:3 :2) 7' .::. .~::I :3 ~) () .~S
BASKIN. HAMDEN HIlI
E3()Sf<.. IN. HOBY,",,!
516 N FORT HARRISON AVE:
C L. E:: f'>t Fi~ 1/,1 (:iT E R F'L
HARRIS, STE:PHEN W
Hf'>tRF~ I ~:~: ,. SHEF~R\' R
1963 EDGEWATER DR
CL.EAF?,i,I,J(~T[R r'L.
25 ~5 ~l .S .~::l 3 '~;) () !:~
~5:?)~7 55.
WHITE:HURST. LEON JR
C/O BASKIN. HAMDEN HIlI
7?O SNUG I ~~;L.(~j'J,D
CLEPiF~(.\I()TF:F':~ FL.,
3:)7'(~}7' 1.~33.l
DENO. JOSEPH P TRE:
BENO" AGNES L TRE
500 N OSCE:OLA AVE # 305
CL.[ARI'!,J()TEG( F'~L.
::5 ~3 ~r .:;1 .::_ ::5 ~;.~ ~~; ~:~
E31::F~L,[:" F~ON(~LD
i3EF~LE. r.')EG(~Y A
131 l_EEII>,1I~RD IS
CL.E(~RI,^,I(-~ TER F~'L_
KUGLER, BENJAMIN R
FF~ I eDj"1(~r-'). t"i()RSH(~i
714 N FT HARRISON AVe
C L_ E (;~ R (/,,1 (\ T E F:,~ Iw L.
::3 :3 ~/ 6. "7 7~ ~?:; () .q
3:S-:t.:;S
BRUWER. JENNIFE:R A
705 N OSCEOLA AVE
C;L[()RII>)ATEF~ ['::L.
:5 :5 7' .~::l .~~;, 25 ~3 .4 :~)
GI-1EEN, ~:::YL \/ I I~>i i"1
531 BROXBURN AVE
T()I"lP(\ FL,
::5 ~:; 6. .1 7' }' ~:~: ~2 :~~;
HOUSTC)i',.! T>(
.
.
BYRNES. LAWRENCE
[JYF~NES" ,JE~;~:':) I C(~I
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 605
C l_ C: (~r~ I,,'J (:~ T F: F<: Fe L.
,JONCS" PE:~',,!I",!y (l
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 606
CL.E~(lrXV')(l TER FL..
3:3 7 .~):3 3 .~) ~~:) ~;l
:::;37 .::,!5 :393~~)
Z{)Ui'\!, HELG{)
BREITLING. SANDY
GE1SELGASTE1G STR 30
81545 MUNCHEN 90
GERt1(.,\NY
ERIKSEN. VIVIAN S
EF<:IKSEN, ROCHELLE K
PO E30X 8<:17
1'10NTE \iIST() CO
2;.114<',:[ Oalf '7
HRABELSKI, DOROTHY
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 609
CLE()f:~lto)ATEF~ FL.
(olROF'E" 1"1 I C:HI';:lEL. ,J
GROPE, SUNOK HONG
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 610
CLE()R"')~iTF:F<~ F;:'L.
::5 ~3 ~1.~) .~) :~3 f~) ~4 Cr
~5:::~ 7 51 E) Z~; IS) 4 ()
NF:UWIRTH. ROBERT F
2153 ELKHURST DR
PL.tll",~O TX
ECf<STE Ir..!., UDO
f<'ROCHSTN~EET ::;;[3
::,244:':, 11T1:
GERI'1Ar'~\t'
"7.5 () ~~ 3 .l,~:, .1 :;~
L.F:ESL.EY, L I ND(~
5S2 PF~(iR I E r'~)E
D(~lf<Orn DLINES Sf)
~:;,'l049
~:;ErTL.E" Bf~lJCE ,J
SETTLE. ELIZnBETH J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 704
CL.E(iRh1i-iTEf::;: E;:'L.
:3 ?:; '7 .5 .:;1 :::s I:,) ~~'j. .1.
OSTERTAG, MARTIN
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 705
CL_EAr~ll,.IATER F'L.
ECCLES. CHET RIll
ECC:L.E~S. II'...!Clf~ID L
PO 80)< 490
l'iPPLEU()TE C(~I
957()3 O,g9()
:5 ~?S '/ ~~, .~:s ~!.S '9 4 ~L
DI~~lF~E. L.OU I :;;;
D(-~F~E. SUS(-~I",,!
236 N LOUISE ST # 309
GL[ND(iL[ C(~I
(')006(,
Hh~OI,,'JN. I"'i(~l;< I NE: S
500 1'.1 OSCEOLA AVE # 708
CL.[iiF:~~',)A TER FL..
::$ ::S '7 !::..:.~ ::3 "'~:I (.1 .1
WADDELL, DAVID E
1"',,1 (-) D DEL L_, G ''/11 E t',J. S
500 1'.1 OSCEOLA AVE W 709
CL,C:AF;~I,~IPITE:H FL
f<, I 1',~C1, 1"1 I C:H(~lEL
f<' I I',!G" T II"10THV .]
12.4 PL..(lCE:f~i DH
S(lNT (~ B(-)F(n(~H(l cr'l
2~ 3 ~'l.~~1 oS :) '9 t.+ Jo
~~) 3 .1.170
ME:SCHOULAM. SAMUEL
FUENTE DE CASTHO
PALMA CHIOLLA # 4 301
HOSQUES DE PALMAS HUIXQI
1'1EXICO
f=?OEHF<. I G" C,';:lRI_ l,h,1
C/O ROEHRIU, SABINE TRE
500 OSCEOLA AVE # 802
C::L,EAH"'.I(-~ITER FL.
:?) 3 7' E:, 5, ~~:; ,:;) ~~t :2
.] Pi 1"1 E ~3" t,,'j I I_T 0 i"! C
.]()I"'iES" F(OSE:
500 N OSCEOLA nVE # 803
CLF:I'iF<~vhnER Fl_
PEF~[IHPI" :<O~::E
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 804
CLEtlRI,.\IATE~F~: FeL.
~~ ::-S '7 .S E~, 39 ij. :2
~5;5 ~l 5. !.) ~3 f~).4 2
KREINER, JOEL TRE
FISHER" JAMES Q THE
1801 CENTURV PAF<:K E STE 240
L.OS (~NGEL[S C;f~
(,\!Oi"J.U" pnTF:,: I C!-< Y
1,/.) 0 I'".! (;'" L_ It'.,! D f~
10 SOUTI"lDOlto,IH CT
HI LL_Sf30F<:OUGH C(:)
9401C) '72'~12
~~()C)C' 7' :22;;L:C)
l,h.lIL.LNE:R" HElL ('I
I,h.lI LL.i"J.ER , E\/[ f<
1928 F~11'1CF~E:ST DF;:
CiLE:ND()LE: C{~l
912()'l 1()44
CULLODEN, CHARLES A
CULLOOE:N. SALLY B
200() 13EL (~IIRE: Dl~~
C;L_END,~~LE Ci~
<:;':'1201 1.121
.
.
LEONHARDT, GUNTER
LEONHARDT. MELINDA C
500 N OSCEOLA AVE W 403
CL.E()RI^,ATF:~R 1-- L..
DAVIDSON. ROBERTA L
~:; /j )' 4 1 ? T H 'A' {j 'y' t....!
ST PETE:RSf::1LJF<G FL
32;~l5.5 ::;St~37
:3:~~/():? ~?8,~3 7
BURDETTE, HARRY M JR
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 405
CL.[r-~RI,\!ATEr:,~ FL_
C;L"E?iSOi'\J,., F'R?ii'"j!<' R
GLEASON. SUSANNE W
500 N OSCEOLA AVE W 406
CLEf~F<I,I\I,,~TER FL"
~~; :) ~1.~~, E~l ::5 ~') ::3 ~7
?;?; 7 ~~ _~~ ?; () ?:; 7'
SAWTELLE. GREG TRE
SAWTELLE. KAREN TRE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 805
CL.e?~r~~I,I~(.~TER F:'L"
CUNNINGHAM, SHERR I L
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 408
CLEI~~f~I,'\)?~TEP F'L.
:; :) -7 :~t !~~l ~-) '~;:I ~l :2
:~) 3 ../ ES 5 z; ~;I ~~ ~7
PEF<r~Y, POGE:h~ B
PEF<F<V" 1,1.) I LI'1?) ,J
PO BOX ?
(~LE>(f~HDF~ I (.) I"il",!
.S()308 OO()?
MAINATI, GEORGE A
1'1 (~ I I'\! (.) T I" S (~ f-<~ (~ H (.j
500 H OSCEOLA AVE ~ 410
CL.[()R(I~f~TEF< FL.
~~; ~:.~ ~l 5, .S 3 ~~) ::S 7"
i"11:::HI_EF~" I-jC)F<ST
500 H OSCEOLA AVE ~ 411
C:::LEAF<I,.!(~TEf~ F't,
MAHECCHIA, VICTOR
500 H OSCeOLA AVE ~ 501
CL.EI~~F<I,I.)(:'i TEh~ FL..
:5 :::; 7' .~s 5 :5 s~ ;~;; 7'
:5 2~; "7 ,S ;::1
GIBSON" ROBERT W
GIBSON" GENEVIEVE
7610 SMETAHA LH ~309
EDEN PF<(~ I F< I E: t""il"!
553.44
BUSWEILER. JOHN T
BUSWEILER, CATHEPIHE E
500 N OSCEOLA AYE ~ 503
CLEAPI,.I!i~T[F~ F:L
:;; ;:)~., .:.~, .~~1 ::5 9 ::3 ~::~
ROE:SCI'1" H('ij'\J~3 f<'
Fi~OESCH" 1"i?)Fi~ I (~ T
48 CASTLED ENE CIP
AGINCOURT OH M1T 1S1
CA"N'(;~D()
FEELE'y'" D(:jl"J I E:L
F:"f::ELE\/, L_?~IUR(')
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 505
CL.EPfPv~tIT[P F'L.
~~) ::; ;r .:;, ,::r
Df>I\" I:3" r:::Dll,J(~F~D (~
D()\lI~:;;" PE:UG\t ,J
T:7:06 HONtlN DF<:
SOI.)TH F3CND Ir',j .
4661<',1 2172
PC)/l\IE" Ur:::OPClE F
R 0 v.! E" t"'j (~ F< Ci () r~~ E T r"'j
2701 REGENCY OAKS BLYD ~ P41
CL_E:~;Rv.,1?)TEF,: FL
3:3 7 .~5 9 .:.L .:':1 ::.:; .~:s
MERWIN" GAlUS WIll
r.'i E F,~ (I~ I t',j. E: U G r.::: r"j I r-;
75 t'10Ut\lT TOi"'j PD
I",!E:~I F<OCHELLE t"j'{
10SO.~::' 1216
POWLEY. CHARLES N
POWLEV. VIRGINIA J
500 N OSCE:OLA AYE ~ 509
CL.Ef)RI,.')ATL:::H F:L.
:;:::; :3 7" ,~=:r .:) :::~; 'S;l z:; S)
BEAN" MARJOPIE E
500 N OSCEOLA AYE ~ 510
CL.I:::(:lRI,\!ATEI~ F:L.
HEALY" WILLIAM P
HEr)l_ '{, B{~PE3f~R() .]
390 E CIRCLE DR
N[~~ LEt'.,!O:X: I L_
:53~7 ~::I.S ?';~:.)3~~
~~ () 4-;) 1. ~) ~r (:, 1.
UF~ I Zr-1F1B(:jPRE:j,.J,{>I" M I f<'E:L
F~RI()S" BE:RTi~~1
500 H OSCEOLA AVE ~ 60T
C L. E: i~) R 1,.",1 (.; T [ F~ Fe:" L
L(]j'viEl(jl~D., Ci(~RTH
LOt1B?)RD" P(.iUI_ I t",!()
1715 [ WILSHIRE: AYE: ~ ?04
~3 () N T i~ (;~ 1'-1 t,.,,! i~ c:: (.)
(:1:? 7 () .~)
~~ 3 '7 .~~~I .:;, ;S '9 ~3 IS)
i."jlLl_EF,~" EJRr::TT S
1'1Il_L.ER., -1IL.L. H
500 N bSCEOLA AYE ~ 603
CLE(:lRll')~~ TEF< FL.
BYRNES, LAWRE:NCE F
n...,tRHES, .JE:3S I C;()
500 H OSCEOLA AYE ~ 604
C: L, [: () R (I,) (.) T E: F;: F L,
::s ~) ~l :::' ,~S ::'5 ~) ;5 S)
::.~ ::) ~l ~~::, .5 ::~; '~) :3 9
.
.
~3T()I'IL" T()T'.]nN(~1
MAX-EMANUEl-STR 8
STARNBERG D 83219
(~EHM;At',,! y
KENNEDY. WAlTRAUT M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE n 202
C L. E (l R 1"'.,1 (>1 T E R F'L.
~~5 ::3 '7 ~51!.S :5 ~1 :~;; Il
NIERENGARTEN. WARREN B
NIERENGARTEN. JANICE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE n 203
C L., E r:~ F< Ii') (~ T c: F~ I:' L.
T U (3 E3 i :3 Ii'",! Ci. H () i;::~ :'3 T
GERlACH-TUBBESING. K
500 N OSCEOLA AVE n 204
CL.E:::f~r<I.^)() TE F~ r:L"
:5 ::5 ~l 5 ~~, :~~; '~~;l :5 ~:~i.
:')37.~)E, ;")'93(:j
F~YE3(->iCf<. Dtli",! I CL.
r-<YD{~C:f<',,, DOF< I ~:;; (~
500 N OSCEOLA AVE n 205
CL,E(~R,.,..)(-)'TER FL.
j"1 I Kf--Ir:::E:V. At",jDF~E I
t'1 I f<'HEE\i" OX(>:t"j{)
C/O P E:: E~
133 G(~PD[:t'j 1~\iIE j"",!
C:LE:(~R~\!ATER F'L
'33755
::::; 3; ~? .~~I 5 ?:; ,:) ::::; (.:1
HOCKL. RAYMOND G
ROCKL. HllARIC J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE n 207
CL[()R\'J(~T'r:f~ f'L,
r I :;:':;CHL.E:R . I DO
F~ I SC:r'IL,Eh~. [)()PHt'",!()
500 N OSCEOLA AVE
CL.E:{)F\~li.,1tl TEr;~ FL
H ::?:()n
:5 ~S -;' .:; 5. ::; S' ~S .:::l
3 Z::; '7 .:;, .~) ::5 I:) ::;; 5
HALEVY. BINIAMIN
H(~IL[VY. ~3(~R{)
500 N OSCEOLA AV[ H 209
CL,[(~r~~I,~(~TEf~ r'I,,,
~'10r~SH[I~lD. JCII--Ji"! ",..1
C C BOX 99'-071
JOHANNESBURG 2000
SOUTH ?':\FR I CA
~3 :,; ~? ~) ,E, , :3 ~~) :3 .~::I
SONDERMANN. WILFRIED
SOND[PMANN. HElGARD
52 ()C(.iCIA ST
CL,[(:)R\'J(4T[R Fl
o · L^EI~)RY. f<' I EF~tlr",j
o · LE()r~\('. D()~,!r"l()
PO E~OX1}0699
SI!~N FF<(~t",!C I 3C:() Ci;>,
94117 ()(.99
::?:; 3 7 6 ')' .1 /~ () ~~:I
E3UCEHJtJS" HEJt'lCi
SPEHLING. CHHISTOPHEH
EDUARD-PFEIFFER-STH 31
7()192 STLITTC()Rf
CER~lICj.NY
F~EHH I ~3" :3T[~VE
FERHIS. ELIZABETH
9540 WHEATLAND AVE
~::;I)tJ,L,ArJ,D C(;~
91040
KRECKEl. PATHICK F
KRECKEL. ELINOR M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE H 304
CL.E()F<~\,\I(-,:)TEF~ FL.
BENO. JOS[PH P TRE
BENO. AGNES l TRE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE H 305
CLr::P{R'.....II~T[P F~L.
::~ ~5 "7 .5. E~, ::~; ~~) 2:; E:.
::~; ::5 '7 E:. .~S :::; '):I ::) (.
REICHARD. LAINE L TRE
2306 GREENGATE DP
(ll)GLJST~~ 0('1
::3 () '~~ () ";/
PER[~ I R(~" ,JOE ><
500 N OSCEOLA AVE H 307
CL~E(4R\^.I() TE:R F'L
:5 ::5 -1 E' E) :; 9 :::S l~~~
WHEATON" MARJORIE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE H 308
CL.,EI~F~~\I(;>ITER F'L,.
CARTER. POBE:RT E
C(~RTE:F~" ,IUD I 'TH I"j
5521 El ENCANTO DR
S{~I'J,T(-,:) r-<os(~ CA
9540<:;' 430n
:3 :~:; ~l !S .~S ?; t) ::~:; (~t
MC KERNAN" MARY C TRE
MC KERNAN" JAMES J JR TRE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE H 310
CLE()r;~I,I,)(-,:)TER FL.
SAWTELLE. GREG F TRE
SAWTELLE. KAPEN R TRE
957 VERDUGO CIRCLE DR
GL.EI"',!D(~L.E C:(~
:5 :::; ~r .S 5. :~S '9 ;,::; (~~
191. ~;:~ () l~::;' .1.~5 2:;; _~l
KUNHARDT. MARIA D
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 401
CI.,E{)RI'\)(~lTER F'L.,
(~R E t'",! () ,. r',! (1 i",j C \(
500 N OSCE:OLA AVE n 402
CL[tlRVh~ TER FL
~:)3~l.:.,51
:5::)7.::~5 :5S13(,
.
.
WEIGAND, RICHARD P
t',! I Cf<EL3, JOHN ~1
411 CLEVELAND ST ~ 110
CLE'I~F<t,'J{lTEF< F-cL
SADLON PROPERTIES INC
411 CLEVELAND ST ~ 110
CL.E(~RII")I~ TEf::?, F~:L...
32) "'l E;, ~, Ii. () () ~4
?5 ~~) ~l.~5 .~~S
PACE TECH PROPERTIES INC
2035 PHILIPPE PKWY
S()F'ET\' H(.~f=,?f30f~ FL.
~3TE 14()
250
::; ";'t (~, t~) 5, ~2 :2 () ()
MC DANIEL, JAMES M
MC DANIEL. MARGEE H
:SOl E:LDR I DCE ~~;~T
C::L.E()R\....I(::i TE:R FeL
/'10USTON T}(
::~; ~:; ~? .5 5. ::) (~~ () (~
CI~\
LE: I f301~D, FI:;~(~i'"jf<
30::, EL.DRIGE: Sf
CL.E(lf::?,II',I('. TE:h~ reL.
'9 () 2~ C:) (~) :;2 .~:3 () l~~~
:5 ::: '7 .~S .~~l
~3 (~ 1<':3 ~~ ~) C~ CJ T "T' ~<.
~~}('f<, S" J ()(~IN
PO (30)( (315:.:22
C: (i L. ('~I f3 (.j S () S C PI
:3 (~ \i () S. I~~ ~.,'! D f::?' E 11',,1 ,J
SAVAS, KATHLEEN W
:;,} L.EXINGiTON (\'I/E
Cf;~ES:5;~<', I LL r".,!J
S;l 1. :~) ~l :2 r~~~ ,:~~~ :;-~ :2
() ~7 () :2 I~:) 1. :2 :2 {~
AMERICAN LENDER SVCS INC
900 E PALMER AVE STE (3
CiLEI"J.DPiL,E C('1
SPINA. JAMES A II
SPINA, MAELIEN YUEN
515 E::L[)R I DCE: ::::;T
C:LEAF~I,I')('IT[R FL.
r:;1 .1. :2 () .:)
:~; :::~; "7 E:, .:;, ~?:; ~~!; () 0:1
RAGUIDEAU. MAURICETTE
~)l;S EL_OF~IDGE ST
CLE:ARI,^)()TEF? r:cL
KIRSCHENBAUM, THERESA
::S17 r:::L.DF~IDCiE ST
CL.r~()f~?I,^)(~TF:F~ FL
3 :5 ~( ~; .~::l :::S t1 () 4
::'5::'57~l!.S 3t3()(~
HARBOR BLUFFS WATERFRONT
COt'.,! 0 0 (i ~~; S t'J, It.",! C
500 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLE(.'lF~I,IJ(~ TEf'( I::':l_
MADERO. E:SPERANZA
500 N OSCEOLA AVE: ~ 102
CLE(:~F?~',,1(.) TE:f~ reL.
:) 3 7. Y::l .~~l ~) c;) (::1 ~~(
:5 :2S 7 .~I ,~5 :3 ''9 :5 ,1
FARHAT. MARY K TRE
500 N OSCE:OLA AVE ~ 103
C:L.E(~F<ll,,1(~TEF? I~:L
MISCAVIGE, LORETTA A
500 N OSCEOLA AVE 4 104
CLE(~lh~J,.,)P: TE:f::?, F:L
::3;:5 7 ~::I 5.:1 ;) 9 :::S 1.
~3 ::; '7 ':5 !.S ::; ':) ::3 J.
STRIJEWSKI, HERMANN
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 105
CL.E(')F<'I")(~ TER FL.
BARTON. GEOFFREY J TRE
BARTON, DONNA L TRE
1(38(30 CARRIGER RO
SONOMr'l C:(:\
:5 ;-;; 7 ~).:; ::::; c;) 3 .1
I):' E5 t.:l ~/ (~ (s ~~~ .4 tS
DORSETT. KENDALL L
CHAIT. ISADORE M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE 4 107
CL.E(.~IF;~hIP,TEh~ reL.
GRPIVES, f~10f3ER1' i-[
2 <:j. ,::) H () F? T t",j E L. L_ F) L_
SI~)CR(~\MEi\!TO C;(j
::33~" 5:':; ?;9~3J,
9 !.S i3:2 S' ISll~) .12
MEEKCOMS. LEON D
ME:EKCOMS. JANICE D
1202 NW tOUNTRYSIDE CT STE 1
t'''j c:: t....j I N t',J. \i I L. L. E C) F:
:~~ I T f<' E: I"',!" [J E 13 CI r:;: ('I i<,
(~I Tf<,Et"!" [)(')\/ I [) I"j
2814 AUTUMN LAKE DR
f<'(.\fY T::X:
'~) 7 1. :2 ;~3
'77 (1, ~:l () !S 7" () Ct
.
.
SCl FUNERAL ~~RV FLA lNC
C/O .,;,'. r.' rl . .:::rY1ENT cor,~p
PROF ~R'( X DEPT 8TH FLOOR
C::LE(:~RI....J(::~T[h:" c':'
PO 130>< c ...8
OF
HOlJST01'.! T><
C'_E~)RI....J(.iT -; '"
PO eo'< 4748
CL.E' .:;llNHER FL.
OF'
2~)
:3 T EL ,~l ()
IECi{HriRT" .Jf~r'1E~3
ECKHART" CARLENE
706 18Ti.' Sf
MANHATTAN BEACH CA
L.UR IE" U,-i\i I [) (>1
SIMON-LURIE" LESLIE
606 N OSCEOLA AVE
CL.Ef)RV"lriTEF<~ F'L"
'~~;~ 0:2 I~' 6., :2.::' c) 6.
3::5755 3 tt5 t1
l'i\/E
F<~ 0:3 ::3" C () U F~T j"J, E ""." D
JOVANOVIC" DUBRAVKA
604 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEr~RI/"I(')TER FL"
~5 ::) '~l f3~) ::3 ;~3 :3 r~3
~~ ::.-; '7 .S .S ?;; ;g ?:~ f!:
OKUBOYE" JULIUS A
OKU80YE" MICHAEL 0
600 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEr~F~VJATER F'~I."
I:) I CCC.lr"!E" I SI:::L.L(\
PICCONE" PATRIlIA
601 N OSCEOLA AVE
C L. E () F<~ I,".J (.':) T E r:;: F~ L
:5~::.~7 E,~5 25i3~-)8
~) ~5 7 5:~, 5. ~s 8 ::s ~~:l
ETT~7 I Cf<:::~~" 1/,I[:i'!D\"
603 N OSCEOLA AVE
CL"Ei~F~ll.J(')TER F'L
iVi(.lCHL.ER" 'r J
22 6 ~-;:, ~3 ,., () F<~ f<. E 'y' F:.: [)
C:L.E()F<I,\I(jTER FL.
~5::; 7 !S E) :::;~3;5S)
::.., ;3 "l c:;, .:::, 2'"7 () 4
MC CORMICK" JOHN D
17305 SANTA ROSA MINE RD
PERf;~ I S Ct~
(12570 95':+0
MARQUARDT" KRISTINE F
PO BOX 16.(:,4
C:LE(jr~I,,'J~)TE:R FL.
~~) ;5 7 .~l "7
JOHNSON. WILLIAM M JR
1,~,S'9 I."ONCi Sf
C~LE(:lRI/,J(~ITE:F~ FL.
WHITEHURST" LEON JR
C/O BASKIN. HAMDEN HIll
720 SNUG I SL()j".!IJ
CL.t:': ()R\IJ(.) TE:f;~ F: L.
::~; 3 '7 !.:~I':) :3 6 :31~
337 6. ~7 .::1...82:::.1
DF~ I VE:Fi" K I RI.<.
BURNS" DOUGLAS J
PO [lOX 40S7
CLE:(-~F~lhJ()TE:F~ FL
CLEARWATER INV INC
516 N FORT HARFiISON AVE
C L. E ri F~ I,h) () T E: f~:~ r. L.
337.5f~ ~l()ig~;r
:5?)~!.55 :39CI;:)
AVf::::
JENKINS. JOSEPHINE F
600 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLE(:)r~I"")(.':lTER F'L..
5:3755 :3819
HENDE:FiSON" MORRIS B
::3()S p(:)Lr'1ETTO L.r..,
L.ARGe) F'L
HENDERSON" JAMES A TR
2056 MICHIGAN AVE NE
ST PE:TERS8URG FL
:~:)::;; 7 ~'l () 4. () .:L (}
~5 :~) "7 () ~~; :3 0.4 () ;~~
GIFFORD" DOUGLAS N TRE
C/O TURNE:R" JOSEPH
611 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLE:{)Pll,JATE::17 F'L
CLEARWATER NEIGHBOFiHOOD
HOUSING SERVICES INC
6()8 1'.! Ci()F~DEr'.! (~I,/E
CL.E()r,,:li,J(>ITEr:.~ F:L
;5::)~7 .::';;1 3~3:7()
337 5.:;1 2)~32i.SI
,I
.
.
j,~'I'..I'''r.T
I" t. "Lr:., ,~
. ,\.1'\ " I", ')-
,l_\ ~ll"U"""""'~,,,>:-_
....L~,' -'.//_
~ :..............~..~ - ..--.~~-..,...;--
~,..~, \1/ ..~, '"'i"- o.
",,~-'." _ .'1-,...,,'..... --<~-.
"C"':l~"~'--~-~,"""~,, . <:("
.. - ~ "",<.\;,.), r--,"
':.'(1'\\.',: ~~
~ "'9'..A~-... ~ " ; I '~,:-..' )
-"'Y/-, "',-'..'>
_, .14/ "ff,.",t ,~, ,'~-
- ?y./l--'--", -,. ""~A '}
'-~,;.:; I t ~... ,,-'~, ~?
.I"';lt)~
C I T Y 0 F
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4"""48, CU'..-\R\\ATEH, FU)HIDA 337=;8-4748
Mr;:\IcIPAL SERVICES BULDl:\G. 100 SULTH :\1YRTLE AVE:\L'E. CLL\R\\\TEH, FLORIDA ,)3756
TELEPI-lO:\E (-T) "i62-'tOOO F,", (:T) S62-'t82S
PAHKS A:\D RECRE:\ TIO:\
DEPART\IE:\T
July 23,2002
. I
-_..~ ~-._--_.,~,...
JUL 2 4 2G02
Mr. Tom Cavanaugh
P.A.C. Land Development Corporation
730 Bonnie Brae Street
Winter Park, FL 32789
Re: Bayview Condominiums, 700 N. Osceola Avenue, FLD2002-060l7
Dear Mr. Cavanaugh:
Attached is the completed Assessment of Open Space/Recreation Impact worksheet for signature and return
when you are ready to pay the Parks and Recreation Department's impact fees of$27,135.04. As we discussed
today, the impact fees may be paid at any time but no later than issuance of building permit. Please keep in
mind since these fees are based on the current year's property tax values updated approximately the second
week of October, if the property values change at that time, a recalculation will be required.
Please contact me if any questions or further assistance is needed.
Sincerely,
~
() . ~ ..
UG-ClL~
Deborah W. Richter
Management Analyst
Attachment
cc: ...-r:iSa Fierce, Assistant Planning Director
Robert Hays, Development Services Coordinator
J,J, Dan Mar Inc., Attention Dan Gleichowski, 670 Island Way, Suite 600, Clearwater, FL 33767
BRI.\:\ J .-\I:<CSr. .\L\YOR-CO\I\II"IU:;ER
\'('HIT:\f:)' CR\Y, VICE ,\L\YOR-CU\I\t1S'IO:\I;R Hun H,\\lILHl:\. CO\I\II"I():\FR
FR,\\!-; Hlljijw/J. CO\I.\II"IO:\FR * BILLf' 1:\" 1:\, C"\I\IL"I()'''/!
FIve
fU)~~
() {POI/}
"Ee)l",\L E.\IPI.OY\II"::;I' ,\:\I! .\FFIE\I.\TI\T ,-\("["1' 1:\ E\II'I.Olm"'
.SMENT OF OPEN SPACEIRECREATIAMPACT
(Expa ~ n of Existing Residential Developments by nits or More)
~;;~earwater
-~
u~
Parks and Recreation
DATE:
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DEVELOPER:
7 J)... ~J () J-.
hCLL/\> ,- C ~~1
,
7DO N,
CC'f"- d ~, <,
{) 502..-6 I C.L
/Tv' e
PROJECT NAME:
ADDRESS:
# OF EXISTING UNITS: 7
ZONING DISTRICT: A'~L,fl-tt),on
# OF UNITS TO BE ADDED:
() I ~S --;-( iL TP ARCEL GROSS LAND AREA:
~ <C PARCEL NET LAND AREA:
~l
4 I / '\
R,~ <;".)., .sT. c I f I c:i>' ,res. )
,Sa.-IYl.-C..
# OF ALLOWABLE UNITS ON SITE:
LAND AREA APPLICABLE TO EXPANSION (% proposed to allowable X net land area): 7 ~~ 1./6
ruST V:L::O~F lj~~~ ONL~~~~~~~~~;c~E~~S_:!~~;,Ec~~ ~A:~~~ELs~~r(,,!
r- /el;Id-. \.-,-UU.L Cl.,\ct p"v-ccl La..r~"t ~-{-2c~
VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT: $ ':-:J. ~ 1* (ruSTVALU5tBY~RP~~.LANDA~~) CL;~Ci.YcC~l'-r:. '.
I A TIEST THAT THE INFORMATION PRESENTED ABOVE IS co~ci,( ~OMPLETI:~ND ;RiSE: 1L I ,-BPtY %t . ,.,: (
PROPERTY OWNER/AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE
DATE
NOTE: All fees payable to the "City of Clearwater". Open Space and Recreation Facility Land fees should be submitted to Parks and
Recreation, Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue. Recreation Facility fees should be submitted to Planning
and Development Services at the same address.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
I. OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT
# of Units to be Added
# of Allowable Units On Site
% (Proposed to Allowable)
Total Site Net Land Area
Land Area Subject to Assessment
Open Space Factor
Open Space Assessment
d..1
SF
SF
SF
II.
RECREATION FACILITY LAND ASSESSMENT
# of Units to be Added
Recreation Facility Land Factor
Recreation Facility Land Assessment
(Not to exceed 6% of parcel net land
area if private facilities provided)
c:,z I
x 150 SF
3. / c.:~7(~ SF
lj e.'1 ::/j d.. K G: (~b =- ,)... q{) j . ) J-, il [ILX-li)"\ LON,
(' /fi-,-'v ,',,:L,... 0' 5^-LLf-+/~ Lz,<-',/c{ J 6J<-',/il,Y\ "'j
/~y,)) C-j~',)
.~J
x $200
$ U ,o--L (;
III.
RECREA TION FACILITY ASSESSMENT
# of Units to be Added
Recreation Facility Factor
Recreation Facility Assessment
RECOMMENDATIONS
I.
LAND
Open Space Fee ....................... I. Lf c~. i SF X
VALUE
L:S' J.. 7
DOLLARS
PAYMENT DUE
SF = $ '-; '-: 'c'!: II Plats: Prior to Approval &
Signature of Final or Record Plat
Projects: Prior to Building Permit
SF = $/ ~_5, ,::. x'~'.:). 7 Same as above
II.
Recreation Facility Land Fee... c;:':. (j <: I SF X
"? .:\ I
III. Recreation Facility Fee ....................................................................... = $ '-(~C(:Building Permit
TOTAL ............................................................................................... = $ J- 7 i j c;.c..':J
PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE
DATE
s:\Parks\Forms\1800-0310A Impact Fee Form #I-Revised S/IO/Ol-Completed form to be retained in Parks and Recreation Administrative Office as a
permanent record according to City and State Records Management guidelines.
CITY OF CLEARWATER ATTN:ENGI
P 4-LiP,J.=E LID
..- ,,-
-' -" --~ -' -'- '-
J J DANMAR INC
3254 MASTERS DR
CLEARWATER FL
33761
W 2 06 RESID CONVERTED M
6,350
38,055 SQ FT
129 X 295
FROM INTERSECTION OF W .00
LINE OF OSCEOLA AVE & N _
LINE OF ELDRIDGE ST TH RUN 041
NElLY ALONG W SIDE OF
MAY 1999
FEB. 1994
AUG. 1990
435,000 10519 2451
319,000 8560 614
270,000 7346 1767
QA
QA
QA
1
207,400
200,400
407,800 08 222 APARTMENT (4-9 UNITS)
. ,~ 'J: ~ ,,~'..' ~ .'
o
N
UNITED BK&TR
100,000 072000 CON ADJUS N/A
~~~~
iO~htlj=-
A
~
.
.
".IT",
.JJ~~~LOF 71/;###
,'1~ .,.,."u,,___~.;__
\ ~"I,I #M--.~':.
..\c:s~: ,\11, \ ~ ~
~ , ' , .
"~'~....'.~...~-."
.. ' -.... II
..~~ ~..
..... - '", . ;:;;:. ~
':.~---_ . ......... ,I'f'.'-\'
-':.?~--'n""~~,\
',...)1TER"I.
"111'
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MU0:ICIPAL SERVICES BULDI0:G, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VE:\UE, CLEAR\'('ATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHO:\E (727) 562-4800 FAX (727) 562-4825
PARKS AXO RECREATIO"
DEPARDIENT
~-~-"".<-- -',
_ 1 \.
~:\\\'\ ."
~~~\'\ ~-~~'--'---'~-1 \.
\ ~; I (1 . ,
\. \\\ ~\)\.. \\ 0 low. _.__' \ ~-,_
\J~ _ .,"
; -' ",-,;. .' ,), ',- (",~,. '
\,V,.i~\r\'(-.' (;- ;....~--_.
July 5, 2002
Mr. Tom Cavanaugh
P.A.C. Land Development Corporation
730 Bonnie Brae Street
Winter Park, FL 32789
Re: Bayview Condominiums, 700 N. Osceola Avenue, FLD2002-06017
Dear Mr. Cavanaugh:
According to the current Recreation and Open Space Land Dedication Ordinance, the above referenced proj ect
will be required to satisfy the Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facilities dedication requirement
prior to issuance of any building permits.
In order to determine the amount owed, the developer or representative should complete the top portion of the
attached form and return it to the City of Clearwater Parks and Recreation Department with verification of the
just value for the land only according to the current year's property tax assessment.
Please note, this dedication requirement could be a substantial amount and an impact to your project.
Therefore, we encourage you to contact Debbie Richter at 562-4817 as soon as possible to estimate the
assessment and to answer any questions.
Sincerely,
tfJii:L
Art Kader
Assistant Director/Planning, Projects & Programs Group
au
------
Attachment: Open SpacelRecreation Impact Worksheet
Code of Ordinances, Chapter 54, Recreation and Open Space Land Dedication
cc: Debbie Richter, Management Analyst, Parks & Recreation
Lisa Fierce, Assistant Planning Director
Robert Hays, Development Services Coordinator
J.J. Dan Mar Inc., Attention Dan Gleichowski, 670 Island Way, Suite 600, Clearwater, FL 33767
BRIA1\ J. AL:\GST, !\I.\YOR-Cml\IISSIO:\ER
WIIITKEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-Cmf\IISSI01\ER Hon H.\\IIITO\. C()\I\IIS.'[O\ER
FR\\K HIBBARD, CO\f\IISSI0i\ER @ BILLJO\SO\, CmL\IISSIO,'\EI,
"EQI:,'\L E\fPLOY\lIsr x\[) AFFlI\\L'\TIVE ACTIO:'>; E\lI'LOYER"
"
.
.
.
}i~rcrr~~
,~'~~M OF r/{~4!~
~~'A. ~."C':rkr~~h~
~'f::.".,.., I ~i'>;.~'"
lt~~ ,,\ I;;,"' , .. " !i\ ~
~C"':l~ --.. (\ - ;' / ~ -;:(Q
~ ~:::::=:- '
~~~. ----::-.ft?r
"':)?ffi--==- .,,,~~
';'~?~"~~Ld"'~~.'\'
~-"'!;rt~l\~,jj'
CITY OF CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
June 25, 2002
Mr. Tom Cavanaugh
P.A.C Land Development Corporation
730 Bonnie Brae Street
Winter Park, FL 32789
RE: Application for Flexible Standard Development application approval to increase
the required height of an attached dwelling within the Downtown District from 50
feet to 78 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the
provisions of Section 2-903.
Dear Mr. Cavanaugh:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application to increase the required height of an
attached dwelling within the Downtown District from 50 feet to 100 feet, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-903. The
proposal includes a 28-unit condominium development within a single six-story building.
After a preliminary review of the submitted ~taff has determined that the
application is generally complete. The applica n entered into the Department's
filing system and assigned the case number: FLD200Z-060 17.
The following items/data need to be submitted and/or clarified prior to the DRC meeting:
1. Clarify the ISR as shown on the cover sheet. The ISR shown is 69,844 square feet
where the site is only 48,352 square feet.
2. Clarify whether fencing and/or walls will be located on the site. If so, details,
including height, materials and colors, will be required;
3. The cover sheet indicates that five spaces will be located within the right-of-way
along Eldridge Street. Only three spaces are evident. Spaces that are located
within or that back out into a right-of-way are not legal spaces and will not be
considered as part of your required parking.
4. Indicate the total square footage of the proposed building;
5. Submit a full parking lot layout for all levels of parking indicating all dimensions;
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
June 25, 2002
Cavanaugh - Page Two
6. Clarify whether individual storage spaces for the dwelling units will be provided
on site;
7. It appears that 1.11 acres will support 27 dwelling units at 25 units per acre (1.11
* 25 = 27.75 units. The number of dwelling units may not be rounded up). Either
the number of dwelling units will need to be revised or the size of the site will
need to be clarified should the submitted figure of 1.11 acres be incorrect.
In addition, please be prepared to discuss the method as to how the height of the building
was arrived at the DRC meeting.
The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on July
11, 2002 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor
of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle A venue
in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at
727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time
that your case will be reviewed. You or your client must be present to answer any
questions that the committee may have regarding your application.
Please be aware that 15 additional sets of the complete resubmittal of all required
information, to include copies of the application, survey, site plan (with any required
changes as applicable), affidavit of authorization, etc. will be required by July 19, 2002 in
order to be placed on the August 20, 2002 Community Development Board (CDB)
agenda.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4558.
Sincerely yours,
_/
Mark Parry
Planner
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Flex\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\Osceola N 700 Bayview Condominum\Osceola N 700
complete.doc
l
l
< ;{.fJ ((}/.._;..r'~4-~
" ~~;',V<, 1\ lup r.~'~""'.i;",
.~.~' -~~ f\lr 4'~'~'~'
\,,?~~ ~.:)~,j_II!V/~-~~~~~X.jJ._.
~;~:~C-:>~.!.:t1~ ! . .,ji:~~Vt~;~
~,t"" ') ",,,- \." J 1/lt?V;;r 'J ~ ..... _
~~~;==:,.,' ' ~,~
'~.~.: pl"/4"'':*"::;'.J<';<./11 ,,,",- ~~.\
\~~'t,f;V~Alrtfl {' V.
.,:"./1 , I. n"'I!'~
!>~.;,.. .rl..../~- t/ " -
"
.
C I T Y 0 F C LEA R~ W ATE R
LoNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
HOUSING DIVISION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUlWING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
Mr. Tom Cavanaugh
P.A.C. Land Development Corporation
730 Bonnie Brae Street
Winter Park, FL 32789
FJ L f COP Y September 20, 2002
,~,-""-""'" 'E
::rll
RE: Development Order regarding case PI J))ClO?-()I\O]7 at 700 North Osceola Avenue
Dear Mr. Cavanaugh:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On September 17, 2002, the Community Development Board (CDB)
reviewed your application to increase the height of a building with attached dwellings, within the
Downtown District, from 50 feet to 81.42 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project under the provisions of Section 2-903. The proposal includes a 28-unit condominium
development within a single, 93,672 square foot, six-story building (with two levels of under
building parking). Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Community
Development Board APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The application is consistent with the Northwest Periphery Area in the Periphery Plan.
4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of approval:
1. That the density of the site be limited to 28 dwellings units (25 dwelling units per acre);
2. That should addressing stormwater issues result in a site plan which is significantly different
from the one approved by the Community Development Board, the site plan must be
resubmitted to the Board for review;
3. That any encroachments into wetlands be mediated through an exotic, nuisance vegetation
control and maintenance plan approved and coordinated with Staff, prior to the issuance of
any permits;
4. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits;
BRIAN J. AUNGST, ~:i"'YOR-COMMISSIm:ER
ED HAHT, VICE MAYOR-COMWSSIONER \~!HITNEY GR-W, CO:V1MISS!ONER
HoYT HA,\i!LTON, COMMISSIONER f~"" BILLJ-ONSON, COMMISSIONER
~;f{I
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
;-
!;
..!
September 20, 2002
Cavanaugh - Page Two
5. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
or as modified by the CDB;
6. That all signage comply with Code; and
7. That, if physically feasible and deemed appropriate by Staff, the width of the sidewalk be
enlarged from four to five-foot sidewalk be installed along the west side of Osceola A venue.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (September 17, 2003) and all required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceedon,e year and only within the original period of
validity.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity
to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate
the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter
with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may
be initiated by a property owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval)
within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall
stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for
your case will expire on October 1, 2002.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 727.562.4558.
Zoning information is available through the City's website at www.clearwater-fl.com via the
"Clearwater Parcel and Zoning" link and "Community Development Code" link (via the
Planning Department site).
a;;~.
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
CC: Mr. Dan Gleichowski, property owner
S:\Planning Department\C D B\FlexVnactive or Finished Applications\Osceola N 700 Bayview Condominum - Approved\Osceola N 700
DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc