The URL can be used to link to this page

FL00-05-17 . . CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 July 24,2000 Mr. James A. Vogel 1721 Rainbow Drive Clearwater, Florida 33755 [~~llE RE: Development Order regarding case FL gO-05-17 at 2750 McMullen Booth Road Dear Mr. Vogel: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.7 of the Community Development Code. On July 18, 2000, the Community Development Board reviewed your application to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 10 feet along Charles Avenue, reduce the front setback from 25 feet to seven feet along McMullen Booth Road, reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 24 feet along Daniel Street, reduce the side setbacks from 20 feet to five feet, and reduce the parking requirement from 24 spaces to 22 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and Comprehensive Landscape Program. Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Board found that the proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval, the maximum development potential standards, and all other applicable standards of the Community Development Code. The Community Development Board granted approval of the application with the following conditions: 1) That the landscape plan be further revised to include a tiered effect along McMullen Booth Road, as provided through a landscape easement within the right-of-way, and that the agreement with Pinellas County for same be finalized prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2) That if the agreement to landscape the right-of-way is not secured, the landscape plan be amended to exceed Code requirements in an equal monetary equivalent as if the landscaping easement had been obtained; 3) That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the plans as submitted; and 4) That signage comply with Code. ONE CITY. ONE FUTURE. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIOl\ER J.B. JOHNSON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HART, COMMISSIONER * BOB ClARK, COMMISSIOl\ER ED HOOPER, COMMISSIOl\ER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Vogel 4It July 24,2000 - Page 2 . Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval and all required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the date of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. Please remember that a building permit and impact fees will be required prior to the construction of the project. Should you have any questions, please call Ryan Givens, Planner at 562-4504. Very truly yours, ha-flJ1 ~V Gerald Figurski, Chairman Community Development Board Cc: Marcus Vernon S:\Planning DepartmentlC D B\FLEX\Pending ApplicationslMcMullen 2750 VogellMcMullen 2750 Development order. doc . . CDB Meeting Date: July 18. 2000 Case Number: FL 00-05-18 Agenda Item: D 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNER: Barry 1. Vogel REPRESENTA TIVE: 1. Marcus Vernon, Esquire LOCATION: 2750 McMullen Booth Road REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 10 feet along Charles Avenue, reduce the front setback from 25 feet to seven feet along McMullen Booth Road, reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 24 feet along Daniel Street, reduce the side setbacks from 20 feet to five feet, and reduce the parking requirement from 24 spaces to 22 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevel- opment Project and Comprehensive Landscape Program. PLANS REVIEWED: Site plan prepared by Walker & Associates Architects P.A. SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.742 acres DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 355 feet by 244 feet (irregular site) PROPERTY USE: Current use: Proposed use: Single-family residential. Office PLAN CATEGORY: RlOG, Residential/ Office General Category (pending LUZ 00-05-07) ZONING DISTRICT: 0, Office District Page 1 . . ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Convenience Store South: Vacant East: Residential West: Residential CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIA TE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity IS characterized with retail and residential uses. ANALYSIS: The 0.7 4-acre site is irregularly shaped with 355 feet of frontage on McMullen Booth Road, 244 feet of frontage on Daniel Street and just over 50 feet of frontage on Charles Avenue. A portion of the site, 0.19 acres, is the subject of pending annexation, land use plan amendment and rezoning cases (ANX 00-05-10 and LUZ 00-05-07). That portion contains an existing single-family residence. The area facing McMullen Booth Road is undeveloped. The majority of the site has overgrown shrubbery and contains several mature oak trees. McMullen Booth Road is classified as a major arterial and is a designated scenic corridor. The applicant is proposing to develop an 8,000 square feet office building as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The project includes the demolition of the existing single-family home. The new office building will have a pitched asphalt shingle roof with a dark green color. It will be 15 feet in height as measured to the midpoint of the roof The building will be made of pale yellow stucco and buff color brick. The plan indicates that the colors are subject to change. Staff believes any changes should be consistent with those on the plan. Windows will be incorporated on all elevations and shutters are included on the north and east (front) elevations. The proposal includes ingress along Charles Avenue to a one-way (northbound) driving aisle and parking lot. The 22 parking spaces are shown at a 75-degree angle. Egress is provided at the north end of the parking lot at Daniel Street. The site plan provides no direct access to McMullen Booth Road. The landscape plan as proposed exceeds the intent of the Code. It includes the required perimeter buffering and trees, plus additional landscaping within the McMullen Booth right-of-way. The applicant is pursuing a permit with Pinellas County to landscape the right-of-way. A tiered effect landscape treatment will be provided within the landscape easement, as the plan is further revised. The applicant has not yet submitted an application for signage and, therefore, it is assumed that all signage will meet the Code regulations. Any future signage proposal that exceeds the Code requirements will require a separate review by the CDB. Page 2 . . A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN THE 0, OFFICE DISTRICT: STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? FLOOR AREA 0.50 0.048 0.247 Yes RATIO IMPERVIOUS 0.75 0.076 0.51 Yes SURFACE RATIO B. FLEXmILITY STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE 0, OFFICE DISTRICT: STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? LOT AREA 20,000 square 32,322 square 32,322 square Yes minimum feet feet feet LOT WIDTH 50 feet 355 feet 355 feet Yes minimum HEIGHT 25 - 50 feet 12 feet 16 feet Yes maximum FRONT YARD o - 25 feet 18 feet - Daniel 7 feet - Yes SETBACK Street McMullen minimum Booth; 10 feet - Charles Avenue; 24 feet - Daniel Street SIDE YARD 0- 10 feet 7 feet - existing 5 feet Yes SETBACK building minimum PARKING 0- 15 2 spaces 22 spaces - Yes SPACES spaces/l,OOO (2.75 spaces minimum square feet of per 1,000 GFA square feet of GFA) Page 3 . . C. FLEXffiILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The site's odd shape and size makes development under the current Code requirement very difficult. A portion of the site's McMullen Booth Road frontage was condemned for right-of-way use and reduced the depth of the lot. The site requires deviations from current Code requirements to enable reasonable development. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; The abutting properties consist of commercial and residential uses. The proposed office will serve as an appropriate transition between McMullen Booth Road to the east and the residential uses to the west. The building has an interesting design and will be aesthetically pleasing. The improvements to the property may positively influence other enhancements in the area. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; The proposed office building is permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses; The proposed one-story office building is compatible with adjacent land uses. Additional landscaping will buffer surrounding residential uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The applicant desires a site with frontage onto a major arterial with access from secondary streets. Due to the widening of McMullen Booth Road, the requested reductions are needed for the development of the site. Page 4 . . 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Jnfill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; Development of the site in a well-designed manner will create an enhanced street appearance. The proposal has interesting architecture and extensive landscaping which exceeds the requirements of the Code. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Jnfill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; The proposed office development will increase the standard of architecture and landscaping in the area and may serve as a catalyst for future redevelopment. The office use serves as an appropriate transition between McMullen Booth Road to the east and the residential uses to the west. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; Staff has concluded that flexibility in setbacks and off-street parking is needed in order to facilitate redevelopment along McMullen Booth Road. While the area is need of an improved streetscape, irregular-shaped lots make it difficult to foster desired redevelopment. The lot was dramatically reduced in size through County condemnation of McMullen Booth Road. The applicant is pursuing an agreement with Pinellas County to landscape the right-of-way that would otherwise be uncovered and poorly maintained. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. This proposed office building will not contain multiple uses, and thus, is not required under Code to enter into a shared parking agreement. The site will contain only two spaces less than Code requires. Page 5 . . D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed development includes a one-story building with extensive buffering. The aesthetic character of the area will ultimately improve with the design of the building and landscaping. The area to the northwest of the site is predominately office uses. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The site may promote and encourage future development and reinvestment along the McMullen Booth Road corridor. The proposed development will not negatively impact prospects of development in this area. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposal will have a minimal effect on traffic. The site plan includes the removal of an existing curb cut on McMullen Booth Road. The site is accessed via Charles Avenue. There is an exit-only onto Daniel Street. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposal includes a one-story office building, which is consistent with the community character. 6. The design of the proposed development mInimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. There will be no adverse effects generated by the proposed development. The applicant has worked with staff to create a quality site plan that will be a positive addition to the area. Page 6 . . SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on June 8, 2000. The applicant has worked with staff to provide an attractive, well-designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The proposal is in compliance with the provisions of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and the resulting site plan will contain several attractive elements. Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application for the site at 2750 McMullen Booth Road, to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 10 feet along Charles Avenue, reduce the front setback from 25 feet to seven feet along McMullen Booth Road, reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 24 feet along Daniel Street, reduce the side setbacks from 20 feet to five feet, and reduce the parking requirement from 24 spaces to 22 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and Comprehensive Landscape Program, subject to the following conditions: I) That the landscape plan be further revised to include a tiered effect along McMullen Booth Road, as provided through a landscape easement within the right-of-way, and that the agreement with Pinellas County for same be finalized prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2) That if the agreement to landscape the right-of-way is not secured, the landscape plan be amended to exceed Code requirements, to the satisfaction of staff; 3) That the landscape plan exceeds the intent of the Code including perimeter landscaping along all property lines; 4) That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the plans as submitted; and 5) That signage comply with Code. Prepared by: W. Ryan Givens, Planner: / / / ATTACHMENTS: / / Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity / / Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BlF"LEX'iPending ApplicationslMcMullen 2750 VogellMcMullen 2750 STAFF REPORT. doc Page 7 . . STAFF ASSISTANT'S CHECK SHEET FOR APPLICATION FILES FILE NAME: \Jo~\ El- CtrOS-\l f\e-'j. FILE NUMBER: TYPE OF APPLICATION: PERMIT PLAN NUMBER: DATE RECEIVED: S' 25-00 ------..----------------------------...-------------.....---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DOCUMENT DATE COMPLETED N/A COMMENTS INCOMPLETENESS LETTER COMPLETENESS LETTER INSUFFICIENCY LETTER: SUFFICIENCY LETTER: ABUTTING PROP. STD. FLEX ONLY OWNERS LETTER DRC LETTER TO APPLICANT: DRC DATE: to. <0' OD DRC COVER LETTER: DRC MEMBERS: (as soon as received send individual applications) ATTORNEY Leslie Dougall-Sidees ECO. DEV. Lou Hilton SOLID WASTE Jaames Maglio FIRE Randv Hinder ENGINEERING (2) Mike Ouillan Don Melone DEVELP. REVIEW Lisa Fierce Mark parry Scott Kurleman Rick Albee PARKS & REC. Debbie Richter EMAIL ENTIRE DRC AGENDA after deadline TO: CYNDI RALPH ASMAR CLERK . NOT FOR FLEX RECOMMENDA TlON TO CDB (STAFF STANDARD REPORT) DEVELOPMENT STD. FLEX ONLY ORDER: APPLICANT LETTER: sm. FLEX O!'.'L Y APPROV AL/DENIAL FLEXIBLE APPLICATIONS STOP HERE! STANDARD APPLICANT LETTER CDB MEETING ST AFF REPORT DUE: DATE: AGENDA CDB: EMAIL AGENDA TO BRENDA MOSES PACKETS CDB: 7 BOARD CITY ATTORNEY CDS ATTORNEY 2 CLERK PLAN DIR. ASST PL. DIR. DEV. REV. MGR. DEVELOPMENT FLEXIBLE ORDER DEVELOPMENT. APPEALS ONLY APPROV AL/DENIAL FLEXIBLE & APPEALS LETTER TO APPLICANT: FLEXIBLE DEVELOP- MENT AND APPEALS TO CBD STOP HERE ! LEVEL 3S CONTINUE , 02-417855 NOV- 7-2002 8:23~ PINELLAS CO BK 12332 PG 2430 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ANNING AND DEVELOMENT SERVICES ..t\ffl so. MYRTLE AV~., 2ND FLO?R, C.LEARWATER, FL 33 ~V ,,' ... ~ 'I..~ \ PHONE. 562-4567, FAX. 562-4576 {-LLIJ--,^- "\0-..-; ~\)'( .::10 '\)'i:.? INSPECTION LINE: 562-4580 e- \Jf ( ~~$j~~~ qr-,. "t DeJe.. . o \t.~fl~{~~~~ DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE ~~~ cJ~ ff_t-p-<-"'uc..pL '$~\I'i:.~\\i 0 vq-'s G-,...-Y' l~...IOD,(,) : NOW OF ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Clearwater 3 l pertaining to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the undersigned, being the fee owner (s) of the following described real property situated in the City of Clearwater, County of Pine lias and State of Florida, to wit: PARC.EL I.p. ae-'2.~-\~' 0003~ - 003 - DOYO - OJO< (LoT\.S~ 4 - 1 0 ') I-\~~: 21~O t'f\c.(Y\ynE~~Q)oo1t\ ~A~' do hereby make the following declaration of conditions, limitations and restrictions on said lands, hereafter to be known and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE, as to the following particulars: ..,~ 1. That the aforesaid plot or combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions thereof, shall hereafter be regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an indivisible building site. 2. That the said property shall henceforth be considered as one plot or parcel of land, and that no portion thereof shall be sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or devised separately except in its entirety, as one plot or parcel of land. 3. That this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run with the land, as provided by law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned, and all parties claiming under them until such time as the same may be released in writing under the order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agree(s) that this instrument shall be recorded in the public records of Pine lias County, 'Florida. ~(~ Signed, sealed, \vitnessed and acknowledged this ~To~~'Q... _, at Clearwater, Florida. day of cae. ~ CO f=:#t ,;}.(!n a. ~ES ~ o:::~. a:::::::/( tfpr ' VOGEL F~C"'\\\..'"\ e(l..OY~~\\~. \.:td SE.~EQp\..\>~ ST ATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME personally appeared :s:- A li\ Q, S' ~. V 0 9 ..Q.. / and , to me known to be the person(s) described in execution thereof to be his, her or their free act and deed for the uses and purpose herein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal this 19 . . r'AGES rP Acel # CHG AAfr CK NKf day of CfL ct~ :::JJJO 2- REC r~.n~.b') OS OR21t OS INT S/Application Forms/Unity of Title Declaration ~ PIC REV T qITIl My Commission Expires: ."6" Kay Y Hartnett ;~~My Commission CC893295 \, ,..,..,,- EllPIr.. FObruary 06, 2004 .;(/'iJ ~ , 3u.S D la...- PINELLAS COUNTY rLA Orr.REC.8K 12332 PG 2431 , .,. KA~'lEENJ~-DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COllin PIHELLASCOUNTY, FLORIDA -~~------------------~~--------------- 2C197492 11-07-200208:24:27 DAT 51 . AGR-CITYOF CLEARWATER "~~~~~~176~;;;-~~G:243 RECORDING 006 pfm...ml" ./ $'18 r:. '- h PHOTO COpy. 7 $2.C " " ." TOTAL: CASH AMT. TENDERED: CHECK AMT.TENDERED: . CHANGE: BY ________ DEPUTY CLERK $30.~ $2.( $28.~ $.( COMMISSIONERS: BARBARA SHEEN TODD - CHAIRMAN KAREN WilliAMS SEEl - VICE CHAIRMAN CALVIN D. HARRIS SUSAN LATVALA JOHN MORRONI ROBERT B. STEWART KENNETH T. WELCH BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 440 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE: (727) 464-3251 Utilization Permit #01-07090 March 28, 2002 Anclote Engineering, Inc. 1721 Rainbow Drive Clearwater, Florida 33755 Attn: J. Marcus Vernon, PE Re: McMullen Booth Road Office Complex Driveway Connection Permit - (28/28/16) Dear Mr. Vernon: We are enclosing your approved Utilization Permit covering the proposed construction described below: Construct a 16' wide FOOT Index No. 515 concrete commercial driveway connection, and modify existing concrete sidewalk, within the right-of-way of Charles Avenue, at its intersection with McMullen Booth Road, per the attached sketch This letter must be attached to and made part of the approved Utilization Permit, making the following conditions binding to the Permit: 1. It is the responsibility of the engineer of record to procure all necessary permits that are required by the agencies that are affected by the proposed construction. 2. Notify Pinellas County Highway Inspector Gene Crosson, at 464-8900, a minimum of 48 hours prior to commencing construction. 3. Please be advised that your required landscaping must be accommodated on the private property, not within the McMullen Booth Road right-of-way. No landscape easement will be granted within McMullen Booth Road right-of-way. 4. Provide the minimum required sidewalk shoulder/clear zone of 2' from the edge of the sidewalk with a maximum slope of 3/4" per linear foot. No permanent obstacles are allowed in this area. 5. The sidewalk handicapped ramps at Daniel Street and Charles Avenue must be in accordance with the latest addition (year 2000) of FOOT Index No. 304. 6. All proposed work must comply with FOOT Index No. 700. 7. All right-of-way installations will be in accordance with practices referenced in the State of Florida Utilities Accommodations Manual. "Pinellas County is an Equal Opportunity Employer" · Member.Pinellas Partnership for a Drug Free Workplace 0 printed on recycled paper 8. All design and construction must conform to the minimum standards set down in Pinellas County Land Development, Zoning and/or related Ordinances, and Minimum Testing Frequency requirements. 9. Signs and barricades to be according to FDOT Manual of Safe Practices; reference FDOT Indexes 600 through 650. 10. Safe pedestrian traffic is to be maintained at all times. 11. Any sidewalk, that becomes undermined, must be removed and replaced. Sidewalks ~re to .be reconstru~ted within three (3). days after removal. When existing sidewalk is removed, it is to be removed to the nearest joint. 12. Saw cut existing edge~of-pavement prior to the removal and the construction of the driveways. . 13. Place.expansion joint between back-of-curb and concrete driveway. 14. Compaction for pipe backfill shall comply with AASHTO T-99 (100%). 15. Disturbed area within the right of way will be compacted to 100% of maximum density and sodded. . 16. Do not disturb existing underdrain or storm systems. If filtration bed is disturbed, contact the area inspecto,r with the Pinellas County Highway Department at 464-8900 for assistance. 17. No stockpiling ot material in roadway or on sidewalk; all dirt and debris will be removed from job site daily. Roads and sidewalk to be swept daily as part of daily clean up. . 18. Any portion ot the roadway that sustains excessive construction related damage, in the opinion ot Pinellas County Highway Department, shall be repaired at contractor expense in a manner specified by Pinellas County Highway Department. Before this Permit becomes effective, it will be necessary to contact the Utility Notification Center, "Call Sunshine", (1-800-432-4770) not less than 48 hours or more than five (5) days prior to construction. sincerel~ /:J ~(~~~ Public Works Engineering Supervisor Right-ot-Way Utilization Permits Permitting Services /jc 010709ula.doc Enclosure cc: Highway Department .- , . AePLICATION FOR SITflli1LAN APFRUV AL ?LANNING & DEVELOPMENT SE-.c-ES ADMINISTRATION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VENUE. 2nd flOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 Thia form must be suhmiu.ed for ill appllea1Jons for residential uses. acoassory uses. nonresidentJal uses. fences. Signs. vesl.ed rights. develop men I agreements. seawalls. docks. marinas and other marine structures and home oc:c;upalioos. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION: \)DC,t L I /-..l i3 () L>..l ~ R LE}~RW AlE APPLICANT NAME PHONE NUMBER I '1 ";)-7 - LJ 47- Lf Lf 4 Lf FAX NUMBER: MAILING ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNERS (Ust all oWners) MAILING ADDRESS I '1 ;)... If ). '1 .. '-1 '-t 7- Y: LI. Lf L/ FAX NUMBeR : r-=-L 33' S-S- -L-f4L-{,;)...( AGENT NAME PHONE NUMBER STREET ADDRESS: LEGAl.. DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: ~'- ~~- I~ - Dc.o3 .. D6 3 - DbS-O SIZE OF SITE: b. .)-5- Y. PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: (number of dwelling units. hotel rDOrTlS or sQlJare footage of 1'10 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Does THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVEL.OPMENT RIGHTS? YES I, the undersigned. acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowled e. FOR PLANNING OFFICE USE ONLY: 0 I LAND USE DISTRICT OF PARCEL: ZONING: __ FUTURE OESIGN~ION: f:../ Dr;, ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AOJACC~T PARCELS: NORTH: C sou~V11f1 EAST:.~~'l WEST -Q_"':"" FUTt;RE Li\NO USE CLASS:F!CATION OF ADJACENT PARCELS NORTH: . 0 sm;Trt ~~,_ E;'S'" ~__. WESi ~L1 9fv aced !W~v~:6 Oo-~~-~ew !~~O~~v~90L r .30IjjO M~l NON~3^ :~8 +uas V aBed !30I~~O MV, NON~3^ <- ~~O~E:vE:90L !~vav:a OO/E:~/g :pa^Ta~a~ , I > II.... .!. :I ~ r r m z ~ o -I I: ~ ~ <Pp. ~Z r ~(p =-1 tIC "" ~ --< 6 - .... -~--_...~_\\.. ~ ZOO:I ;R r- 1\ ~ -:1 ~ () J~ ): :t>. __(fl )>-1 0 :z CJ 2~ ?-1-'j{) 'j{)~ -I -I mJ>z3 ~ ~) -<: P'~ )> m z m m ~. (J! m F ::I 5:!.' O. ;4J rr ~ Cl (.;1 ~~ 0 Omrr m \) _~<p<Pm --t l> .I> m --I m- e nt -I G\ -I ~ ::I -I OJ El> l> l> ~ m {ll l> {ll1: um ;-J {ll ~ )> ~z ~ () p-l ~ fJ 7\ n rl> :.J () P 7\ ~ . () "" -, ... m .~ m l> ~ ""\J1~ 'j{) ~ ~~ "-) "" 1.J - ""\>l\JT '-.>11 () . & ~ \i1 ~ Ul""- ~~ \J:!1t() Gi -\)l ~ ~ -I l> ~ It ,.1 It ~ "'\ -1-1 It""....., ~~ O. ~ -( -I -I""ij\ C (fl ~ <p (J) (fl :-n <p <P\J1 \J1 ~ '11 LO ~<p m It :-n \J1 ~m --t "-' <pO \JJ ~ "" \JJ '11 \)l \J1 '- "" "" 0 (fl m II ~ "" to.) Ut ", ~ \\'1 "" .... \).1 ~~~ ~~ I :-n "" (1' <J1 0 ~ ~ \J1~ () Gi Ut -n It , -" It It ~~ ~~ It () ~ ~~ ~m ~itl l>p ~@ ~~ ~ om~~-< mo ~~ Srt ~\JJ ~:n () "-~I r )> ~ ~ () " l> rn "" nl ~ ~ () m ~~I~ ~ i~.i O~~ 0 0 ~ A:' po )>. 0 :b= .. 'i::' z ~ :\ / OJ ~ ~ m ~ I ~ ~ ~ J-< ~ \ ,/ I/~~# ~ili ~ g~~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ )f ~~i~r ~ ~ m ~ jJ ~ ~ / I 1m ! ~~ l!: m '"i ~ ';1 p ~ P1 ffi . 0 ~ ~~~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OJ ~ o~g: ~ ~ ~ ~ m p )>. ~ ft I~ i ~ ~ < -I 11\ ~ \"'. ~ )>.1 j- )>-< :: ~ ~ -< ~ ~ ~ ~!; t= 8 @ ~ ~~ ~ i ffl ~~:::! Z $ -I J ~ c PROPOSE '~6IfE BUILDING =rJ\~~ -~ .' s, ~ LtJ BAR,t.:Y VOGEL \~\1 WAi.KER 'Aft8OC1ATE8 ARCftTECT8 PA --,.........--.'~- CLEARWATER. ,'--_ ~A .-.:~,~~ ~~ Evf.. ~~~ IafRJ Harbar. F10rIda 34815 (113) m::~ L)-c2~'QD LJ. kd03] ... -'!: ji (' ~ . ~-'-'\1 . ~ . C>> =f1: ~ 1 ~-r~ i ! r- - - - - 9"ri~ I I '~TIi : ~ )> H I 0 ~ ~~ ^" "" " . CP -- .....t. / ~ . ~~Q .....:... (' \.f)/ ~! ;<~~~i 1-- V !~ ~ ~t:" ~ ~ ~#7~~ ~ ..:~~ JP' ~ / ~ 1> CA 0P ~ 'J ,/ W ~ '7' 0/'4~ 0 / 0-~-'; / / ~ 1 (J) () o / // m X (J) -f . * l......... ~ }; - -- I 1c2:l' ~I :,,- 16' / ) ~ S ~ . ~ ~ ~ o )>. ! ~ '- ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ .:J . rY'o..r6.A.S V erhOf\) E:sn- 171-lh1..1 n bow CJ..-. . C-lc-cu-w(A.J-er -' t=' L 3375S- ::IitnE-S A. \f Cj e-I \/2../ "KCL'lnbo<-0 [)r. Clear u.;cd-er) F L 33 t-SS- CRISSCROSS CENTER CO 5544 STALLION LAKE DR PALM HARBOR FL 34685 2532 VENIS, MONTE 2737 STATE ROAD 580 CLEAR(I.!ATER FL 33761 3343 D 580 WYMORE, LARRY D 2730 DANIEL ST CLEARWATER FL 33761 3308 . Cb~ ~-~~& J;s, FL CO-o!5-4>'- J 7 (3 0) Q~ .&-r:) VEN~"" ~10NTE . 273' -- __ ) 580 CLE T-- 33761 3343 COPPOLA, DOMINIC R 2734 DANIEL ST CLEARWATER FL 33761 3308 MISKOVE, WILLIAM F 2720 DANIEL ST CLEAR(I.!ATER FL 33761 3308 C-STORE G F B-D B T C/O CARDINAL CAPITAL PARTNER 8411 PRESTON RD STE 850 Df',U.AS TX 75225 E TOOL. 2753 CLEAR I 33761 D. u~rAN~Ei' RE 27 5. , CL V. A FL 33 .. INC ROV.!E, BETTY S 2745 DANIEL ST CLEARWATER FL 33761 3323 VOGEL, BARRY J 504 WESTBOROUGH LN SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 M ,,;:)"+000 ..L.VL.:> PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARv.!ATER FL 33756 5165 M JR HUPP, ROBERT R Me MULLEN, ALLEN M JR 104 KLOSTERMAN RD P(4L!'1 HARBOR FL 34683 1025 ROGERS, PHILIP W MC MULLEN, ALLEN 1754 ARABIAN LN PAL!'1 f-IARBOR FL ;54685 3346 DE F()SS~. n RE W DE FOSSS A A L 3060 Al I ~ . (':1 FARIAiA h' FI . / DOERNER, J TIMOTHY DOERNER, LEM'J.r-!E: 1646 LAGO VISTA BLVD P(~U'i Hf'IRBOR FL.. 34685 3353 CREATIVE WORLD SCHOOL INC 13315 ORANGE GROVE DR TAMPA FL ;:;:5618 2915 VAN .DY~E MA' 'NE TOO~L ' 2753 S 5 CLE -R FL 33761 DUN~N VE E 274 ' ,0 ClER J " Fl 337, . INC ROGERS, PHILIP W MC MULLEN. ALLEN M CIO HUPP, ROBERT R 104 KLOSTERMAN RD PALM HARBOR Fl 3LfCa'83 - {DJ-5 0"1t>1:I0 l.VL~ VOGEL, JAMES A TRE 386 BELLE POINT DR ST PETE BEACH FL 33706 2617 DE FOSSES, THEODORE W DE FOSSES. SANDRA L 3060 ALLEN AVE CLEAR\iJATER FL 33761 330.1. ROGERS, PHILIP W MC MULLEN, ALLEN M JR 1754 ARABIAN LN PALM HARBOR FL 34685 3346 HUPP, ROBERT R 104 KLOSTERMAN RD PALM HARBOR FL 34683 1025 HUPP, ROBERT R 104 KLOSTERMAN RD PALM HARBOR FL 34683 1025 FANCHER, DORIS F 3070 ALLEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33761 ;:;::';01 !'1C ELROY, TED A MC ELROY, JILLAINE 8 3050 ALLEN AVE (':1 FARWATFR FI . / . CITYOFC~WATER AFFIDAVIT TO AU!!IORIZE AGENT . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 sount MYRTLE AVENUE. Zflfl FLOOR PHONE (727)-5624567 FAX (127) S62~S76 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS :r r-l HE- S G-. VbGf: l (Name off 8M property awnel$) 1. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: AODR~:: GENERAL LOCATION: )fl}.) \ ~ L <;! "Y N<!. H uLLE. tJ 8o{,TH-. ~ LbTS -!;~I-,7, ?, 9,10 AcKE.R's SiU3V'1 Vl5iL>tJ As f.<EL6R~-~'-j) -3oc i< . D - => bE- q, Q , LLHS C:otJ 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (Nab.. of request) 3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint - - :5 k ~~ ~ ~ U 5" E IV' () tJ E 5' q U 8S (hisllheir) agent(lI) 10 execute any petitions or oIhet' docwnenls neceaary 10 etrecl such 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of on the above described property; I PLANNING & DEVELOPM-~NT e foreg8~Jf~~~T~~rrect. .,) STATE OF FLORIDA. COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before me thIs ~ Y. d day of 1:1 14 'i . A.D., _ ~oo to me and/or by "Tit H e.s fj... \) vb 6- L , ~o is personally k~as produced' t-J j 1-4 __c- as identification. SIGNED (Property Owner) SIGNED (Properly owner) ~!l Notary public. My commission expires: ,~-:;,,~'t..... LOUISE HOVE ~....~. [:: "~;~ MY COMMISSION II CC 634278 . f EXPIRES: April 14, 2001 ~l~.:_~.o~~~~~~~derwriters It SIGNED (Property Owner) ~/~ aced !WVv€:6 OO-€~-Aew !~~O~€v€90L !30I~~O MVl NON~3^ :A8 ~uas 9 aBed !3~I~~O M~' NONH3^ <- ~~O~~v~90L !~~gv:g OO/~Z/q :pa^T888H WALKER & ASSOCIATES AltUTECTS PA 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST - SUITE 701 SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA 34695 PHONE (727) 726-4766 FAX (727) 726-4767 (L[E1T1T. (ID[F" 1T[ID~~~[ij]01r1T~[L DATe JO. NO ATTC...TIO.... -I TO rz 'jb.t-4 GlVF1L-lS r..l T( c?~ ~LFZ/)nl.Pl?(r?n~ GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached 0 Under separate cover vIa o Shop draWings o Copy of letter o Prints o Change order o Plans o o Samples the following items: o Specifications COPIES OAT[ NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: 0 For approval 0 Approved as submitted [J For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 For review and comment 0 0 FOR 8105 DUE 19 o Resubmit_copies for approval o Submit _ copies for distribution o Return_corrected prints o PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COpy TO SIGNED: " _"clotur.. .r. nof .. not.d. ","cU, "0',1, UI .r o"c. I i I '. -. v, " ill .- I [~r-~' , ~ ,:';,;: ". 'If . . Goals, Objectives and Policies Transportation ARE/1' PRlMLA..RY l\RTERlf..L Downtown Clearwater: S.R. GO, between -Memorial Causeway and Highland LA1venue; Alterftate U.S. 19 between the southern City Limit ed Druid Road Clearwater Mall: U.S. 19, between S.R. 590 and Belleair Road (also a baeldogged faeility) Policies 5.7.1 Special TraHspertatiofl Areas shall be considered as interim designations and shall be subject to r-e'liew during the e';'Elluatien and appraisal in -l-99+ 5.8 Obje_ On.ite tr~e f?r n.n....idenliol par.,.!. Il"'ater ~:";: a: :" ~ ~"" ed for _deatool development. .f greater the r;;;;;:.;;: -= sholl he ~pr..'.d I>y the City Tr~e .EHgiaeer .fer e",:;;-;:.e .::; adopted City standards as a eontlRulng funetion OR Development Code. Policies 5.8.1 ~~ ~~d Develepment: Coae shall be ameHEled to require develepers of ~~"cd in Ohjoeti.... 58 te provide safe, eanvem: ::oIe parlang m a ffiar.ner detenmned acceptable by the CIty Traffie g . 5.8.2 ~~ ':": p_e -.p_ ways sholl he ~~ c{)flsidcred for inclusion in all public mad and facility devele ;;-;.; ~ impmvements. Previ.iOll sholl h. made in the Laod D<<'CI_ Code for :':' :" :~ ::~:. flow, and these shall ee enforced by reqUIrement B It P 5.8.3 6. GOAL - THE RESOURCES OF ALL RESPONSIBLE JURISDICTIONS SHALL BE DIRECTED TOWARD IMPROVEMENT OF ROAD LINKS TO DESIRED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS IN LA1 TIMELY FLA1SHION. 6.1 Objective - Roadway improvements to obtain desired Levels of Service must be included in State, County, and City capital budgets. The City shall actively participate, on a continuing basis, with both the staff and elected official support, in the preparation, adoption and implementation of transportation plans and expenditure programs of the M.P.O., P.S. T.A., Board of County Commissioners, and the F.D.O. T. 17 Goals, Objectives and Policies . . Transportation ,,- <#- Policies 6.1.1 The City shall review and comment on the proposed capital improvement programs and provide input to the adopting agencies relative to consistency with Clearwater's Comprehensive Plan. 6.2 Objective - By May 1990, Proposed developments accessin!!Whase traffie is prejeeted to utilize the fallowing roadways, whieh are eurreRtly backlogged roadwavsfaeilities operating at lower-than-LOS "E" conditions, shall be subject to additional service enhancement proposals, ro-which may include ride-sharing, access control, signal optimization, transit accessibility, and staggered work hours, to maintain and improve the roadways' average peak hour operating speeds at the time of plan adoption: A) Site design shall provide a stacking lane or lanes to permit vehicles to wait on-site and enter the traffic flow when gaps occur; B) Site design shall provide a deceleration lane or lanes to enter the site without impeding the traffic flow. C) No new traffic signals which will reduce peak hour travel speeds will be permitted, unless a high accident rate exists, D) New or revised median openings will only be permitted where they do not impede free flow of traffic. E) Additional service enhancements, as appropriate Policies 6.2.1 The City shall require as a condition of permit approval. new development and redevelopment proiects adiacent to State roads to obtain FDOT permits as required.In or-aer to determine whether the City has "maintained" the operatiRg coaElitieR Oft a eacldogge<l road, an ar.flual evaluation shall be made. 11 10% staRdard shall be applied t-o either increases in ~/olume, or decreases in peak hoor operatiRg speed shall be applied. This "10% staftdard" shall be cumulative until 1994 at ...lhieh time the COffil3refl.Cflsi'/e Plaa ...fill be ree'/aluated. 6.2.2 Access points to collector and arterial streets from all development should be limited to one (1) major access point or curb cut along each roadway frontage; additional access and egress points may be granted for unusually large parcels, based on site characteristics or as considered appropriate by the Traffic Engineer and approving agencies, to provide for safe and efficient site-related traffic movements on adjacent street. 18 r , -GOalS, Objectives and POlicie' . Transportation 6.2.3 As a condition of site plan or subdivision plat approval for development or redevelopment, the access or egress points to major collector or arterial streets may be relocated, restricted or otherwise controlled to facilitate traffic flow along the adjacent thoroughfare. 6.2.4 Out-parcels, created in previously approved developments, shall have no inherent right of direct access to major collector or arterial streets unless such access is the only access available to the property. New out-parcels may be denied direct access to arterial or collector streets, unless approved by Florida D.O. T. when the development abuts a State road. 6.2.5 Where appropriate, primary access on backlogged streets should be directed to adjacent non-residential collector streets, with limited secondary access to adjacent arterials. 6.3 Objective - In order to meet desired Level of 8eniee stftBdards as set forth in Policy 5.5.1., by 1990, funding for improvements should be included in the Transportation Improvement Program, in order of priority group:~ The City of Clearwater shall annually update the City's Transportation Improvement Program to include projects that increase the capacity of roadways. and provide input in the update of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Transportation Improvement Program involving County and State roads. The following transportation improvement protects which will enhance road capacity are scheduled for construction within City. County and State work programs for FY99-05: Road Se2ment Druid Road at Arcturas Summary: Add turn lane on Druid Road Jurisdiction City Keene Road Druid to Sunset Point Road Summary: Construct 6-lane divided roadway (Druid to Drew) Construct 4 lane divided roadway (Drew to Sunset Point) County Sunset Point Road US 19A to Keene Road Summary: Construct to a 2 lane divided urban arterial roadway County Highland Avenue Druid to City Limits Summary: Reconstruct from 2 lane roadway to a 2 lane divided roadway County SR 590 (Drew Street) North Highland Ave to NE Coachman Rd. Summary: Reconstruct 4 lane divided State SR 55 (US 19) at Coachman and Sunset Point Roads Summary: Add lanes and reconstruct NE Coachman and Sunset Point interchanges State 19 Goals, Objectives and pies . Transportation ARE,A.. PRIl\L'\RY,'\RTERI,'\L Downtown Clearwater: S.R. 60, between Memorial Causeway ftHd HighlftHd ,'\venue; ,'\Iternate U.S. 19 between the southern City Limit ftHd Druid Road CleftFwater Mall: U.S. 19, between S.R. 590 and Belleair Road (also a baddagged faeility) Policies 5.7.1 Special TIatlsportatioH Areas shall be considered as interim desigaatiOfls and shall be subject to r'€l'/lev/ duriag the e'/aluatiofl and appraisal in -l99+ 5.8 Obj.dive 0.. site t..fIi. fOF Roorcsid...tiol ,...... t:F<oteF!hOD :-; :,.. ~ ~ ~e. ODd for resideatiol ~.pm..... of. greoter thOD ';;::;.;.7 -::: sholl I>e ~roved I>y the elly Tr~e ~glBe.r for eam;-;;,.ei::;; adapted City st8fldards as a eontlRUlRg fHnetlan Had De;'elopment Code. Policies 5.8.1 The Land De'lelopffieflt Code shall be amended to r-equire develepers of ~~~~ ~dressed in Objeetiye 5.8 to pr-e.tide safe, coIWenioot biC):'lc parking in a mar.oor determifled acceptable by the City Traffic E;g;;' . 5.8.2 ~:~~ ~ pedestrian tFanspartatiOfl ..-laYs shall be specifically cOHsidcrcd fur inclusioo in all public read and facility de'/eJepmoots or impr-o'lemeflts. Previsien sIIaIll>e made in the Land DlWe'_ Code for :r:: ;:":: ~::. flow, and these shall be enforced by requlr-em.eat:ti It p 5.8.3 6. GOAL - THE RESOURCES OF ALL RESPONSIBLE JURISDICTIONS SHALL BE DIRECTED TOWARD IMPROVEMENT OF ROAD LINKS TO DESIRED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS IN 1'.. TIl\fEL Y F,A..SHION. 6.1 Objective - Roadway improvements to obtain desired Levels of Service must be included in State, County, and City capital budgets. The City shall actively participate, on a continuing basis, with both the staff and elected official support, in the preparation, adoption and implementation of transportation plans and expenditure programs of the M.P.O., P.S. T.A., Board of County Commissioners, and the F.D.O.T. 17 Transportation Goals, Objectives and Policies . . Policies 6.1.1 The City shall review and comment on the proposed capital improvement programs and provide input to the adopting agencies relative to consistency with Clearwater's Comprehensive Plan. 6.2 Objective - By May 1990, Proposed developments accessin2Whose traftie is pro-jetted to utilize the rellewing road,,'ays, whieh are eurrentl:r backlogged roadwavsfaeilities operating at lower-than-LOS "E" conditions, shall be subject to additional service enhancement proposals, te-which may include ride-sharing, access control, signal optimization, transit accessibility, and staggered work hours, to maintain and improve the roadways' average peak hour operating speeds at the time of plan adoption: A) Site design shall provide a stacking lane or lanes to permit vehicles to wait on-site and enter the traffic flow when gaps occur; B) Site design shall provide a deceleration lane or lanes to enter the site without impeding the traffic flow. C) No new traffic signals which will reduce peak hour travel speeds will be permitted, unless a high accident rate exists, D) New or revised median openings will only be permitted where they do not impede free flow of traffic. E) Additional service enhancements, as appropriate Policies 6.2.1 The City shall require as a condition of permit approval. new development and redevelopment proiects adiacent to State roads to obtain FDOT permits as required.In or-der to determine wbether the City bas "maintained" the operating eoadition on a bacldogged read, an arumal evaluation shall be made. .A 1 O~<. st:aJidaTd shall be applied to either increasos iB volume, or decreases iB peak hoor operating speed shall be applied. This "1O~<' standafd" shall be cumulative until 1991 at ';,wch time the Compreooll5ive Plan vlill be ree';aluated. 6.2.2 Access points to collector and arterial streets from all development should be limited to one (1) major access point or curb cut along each roadway frontage; additional access and egress points may be granted for unusually large parcels, based on site characteristics or as considered appropriate by the Traffic Engineer and approving agencies, to provide for safe and efficient site-related traffic movements on adjacent street. 18 ~ Goals, Objectives and pOlicie. . Transportation 6.2.3 As a condition of site plan or subdivision plat approval for development or redevelopment, the access or egress points to major collector or arterial streets may be relocated, restricted or otherwise controlled to facilitate traffic flow along the adjacent thoroughfare. 6.2.4 Out-parcels, created in previously approved developments, shall have no inherent right of direct access to major collector or arterial streets unless such access is the only access available to the property. New out-parcels may be denied direct access to arterial or collector streets, unless approved by Florida D.O. T. when the development abuts a State road. 6.2.5 Where appropriate, primary access on backlogged streets should be directed to adjacent non-residential collector streets, with limited secondary access to adjacent arterials. 6.3 Objective - In order to meet desired Le."td of Serviee stftHdards as set forth in Poliey 5.5.1., by 1990, funding for impro".fements should be induded in the Transportation Improvement Program, in order of priority group:: The City of Clearwater shall annually update the City's Transportation Improvement Program to include proiects that increase the capacitv of roadways. and provide input in the update of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Transportation Improvement Program involving County and State roads. The following transportation improvement proiects which will enhance road capacity are scheduled for construction within City. County and State work programs for FY99-05: Road See:ment Druid Road at Arcturas Summary: Add turn lane on Druid Road Jurisdiction City Keene Road Druid to Sunset Point Road Summary: Construct 6-lane divided roadway (Druid to Drew) Construct 4 lane divided roadway (Drew to Sunset Point) County Sunset Point Road US 19A to Keene Road Summary: Construct to a 2 lane divided urban arterial roadway County Highland Avenue Druid to City Limits Summary: Reconstruct from 2 lane roadwav to a 2 lane divided roadway County SR 590 (Drew Street) North Highland Ave to NE Coachman Rd. Summary: Reconstruct 4 lane divided State SR 55 (US 19) at Coachman and Sunset Point Roads Summary: Add lanes and reconstruct NE Coachman and Sunset Point interchanges State 19 _APPLICATION FOR SITEDLAN APPRUVAL LANNING & DEVELOPMENT SE.ES ADMINISTRATION . MUNICIPAL SF.:.tVICES BUILDING. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VENUE, 2nd FLOOR ~L, PHONE (727).562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 \ (if Q This 101m mu!ll be suhmilled for till iOollcallons for residential uses, acoessory uses, nonresidentJal uses, fences. \I\r Signs, vured rlghls, dev810pmenl agreements. seawalls, docks, malinas and other marine structures and home oocupalions. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION: /] r1 f<. ~ V "T. \J - Eo L C201t.J 13D~ 11< ~LE, MAILJNG ADDRESS u..> ttT~ R APPLICANT NAME PHONE NUMBER '1.).. '7 - 4 4 7 - Ll i..f '-l Lj FAX NUMBER : ? d.- PROPERTY OWNERS (List all oWners) AGENT NAME S H r'H< Q. u" :> V F- r< tV 1'1),\ ~~~,tJ Gut>.!' ':DR : __". H-~ 7 - L/ 4 4 Lj FAX NUMBER: FL 33'7 ::,-s- MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER PRoposeo DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ~.DDRESS: ;). '7 5- 5- }) rt tJ \ E- L 5'T. C!. L r~ H R. vi A r c 1'( I Ie:- L ..::f...2.."7 C i L/.JTL.j, 13LucK:1, A<:-.kER'5 S,.)/3b'VISIDt-J,~5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1'30<,30 )J17 (,.;.. E ' LI c.. E.C 0 R J 0 F ,""'JfJ~ il j 'I 1/( , fulllll II ;,j.,J;1 -' fI",) ~ \ o Q \ o \f) ~ PARCEL NUMBER: ,~s- I tJ PLwr PROPOSED VSE AND SIZE: (number of dwelling unils, holel roomS or SQuare footage of nO SIZE OF SITE: PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT NO CITV OF CLEARWATER DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVEL.OPMENT RIGHTS? YES I. the undersigned, acknowledge thai all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEllAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ;;2.4 ~ day of H 'ft~ . A.D., .. 3.000 to me and/or by i'3 A-tQ 'I '~'\: Voc.. G- L . who is ersonally known has produced ide tification. ~~, Notary public. my commission e~pires: 1 FOR PLANNING OFFICE USE ONLY: LAND USE DISTRICT OF PARCEL: ZONING: ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACCNT PARCELS: NORTH: SOUTH C:~RE ~:;~~"A:O - ~~ ~ ~^ .f(.(OG SCl;TiL 1M. E;'S~ ~/o~. WESi FUTl;f'{E l../I.NO USE CLASS:t:!CATION OF ADJACENT PARCELS: NORTH: S/v aBed ~~Vv8:6 00-8c-Ae~ ~~~O~8v890L ~3JI~~O MVl NON83^ :A8 lues V aBed ~30I~~O MV, NON83^ <- ~ ~o ~8v890L ~~vav:a OO/8~/9 :paA,a8a8 . CITY OF CLMRW ATER AFFIDAVIT TO AuWlORIZE AGENT PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMlNlSTRA nON MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 soum MYRTI..E AVENUE. 2"" FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (127) 562-4576 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS 8A~'Ry S. VUGEL (Name off IIH property owne~) 1. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: ADDRESS OR GENEAAllOCATION: :11 S f)- ~ 1} /.J \ c:. L ST. C LE n R lJ..J ,"tT r= R, F L '3 3 ? (, I Le>T 4, [lL()(.1<..3, Ac.t<lZ.l?ls SUi:::;~I\JISjDfJ. 17-..5. RELO~))E..1 ItJ PLAT (3/..16i 30 \JAG,E cr, eu:>"/X:i)s (;,oF P",<=:LLr:ts CbV - 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: J! ~~~ / !5if or /Ar1!O t/>~/ . ~. or dwl(j (Nature of request) 3. That the undersigned (!las/have) appointed and (d~es/S91appoint 3" M If.H,\)Q..u S VEt? ~ D to, E S Qu I R. E- lliS (hisllheir) agenl(S) to execute ilIny petitioM or other documents neceuary to affect such petition: 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. STATE OF FLORIDA., COUNTY O~INELLAS Swom to and subscrtbed before me this ~ 1./ -1 day of H /., ..[ . A.D" 3 ~ood to me and/or by \"=3 A- R R."; r. I( Db. E:.. L , who is personally known has produced "-> J n- - . --' as identification. SIGNED (Property Owner) SIGNED (Property Owner) LOUISE HOVE MY COMMISSION /I CC 634278 .~ EXPIRES: Aprl114, 2001 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters SIGNED (Property owner) Notary public, My commission expires: 9/9 eBed ~~Vv8:6 00-8~-Ae~ ~~~O~8v890L ~3JI~~O MVl NON83^ :A8 lues ~~Vg~:g OO/8~/9 :pa^,a~a~ 9 aBed ~30I~~O MV, NON~3^ <- ~ ~O ~8~890L .--.... r'~,."-;' . . INST # 98-083208 MAR 19, 1998 4:09PM . J RETURN TO: ARTA 24701 U.S. Hwy.19Nort11 Suite 102 Clearwater. FL 34623 (813) 797-7671 01 RECORDING !lEe L.~-~.,,_ f ~s g;;.(p5;~"&d INT In:s r1n: COUNT'! FLAG? PINELLAS10029 pG 10 OFF.REC.BK ric fiE V 9Ct . VI III:.U-VUGEL RECORDING DOC STAnp - DR219 .... .."'- ''''.tJv 1 3 '10.50 $565.60 1 cn- \ r520.:( 0 eafr/ I COUNTY DEED 0 [E(G[E~W~1n\ il I :: i'oN"" ... i ~ TIllS DEED, made this ~ day Of~. 1998 ~ c. ,-J;~~TY. FLORIDA, a political subdivision, 315 Court Street, C earwater, FL ~@11'5i6~party of the firt;t part, and James A. Vogel and Hazel E. Vogel as Trust s, U/T/WTi.1at€<f::5~~~195;~~ of t>>e second part, whosemailingaddressis386BellePointDrive.St. Pete Beach, Florida 33706. 1'1'?70" 0 TOTAL: CH~rK A~T. TF.NDER~P: C4ANGE: $576.10 $576.10 $.O!) That the party of the fIrst part, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 to it in hand paid by the party of the second part, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the party of the second part, their successors and assigns forever, the following described land lying and being in Pine lias County, Florida: Subject to Easements and Restrictions of record. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. ,-- 00CW!lpnt:.'ry T'lx I-'d, $ _2Jc J . (;, 0 t ___ _ _ _,___ ____,____,___Inlangib!o 'lax Pd. K'i"w:n F P'~~lslk. PinoHas County 8y_,__/.J;C.~____ Deputy Clerk Parcel Number: 28/28/16/00036/003/0050 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Board of County Commissioners acting by the Chairman of said Board, the day and year aforesaid. ATTEST: KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER Clerk of the Circuit Court ~.." B . .', ";., . <'''~'{:'\/.. " eputy Clerk '" ..'~ .;:./'1 .:;;,':." ,', :1, ,."" '"..": '~r, '\ I;:: , ' .' r ' I ' '. rr_. . , ". ........ '"~ ,"'" -. . : '.~,\ \.:./ , ,~: '~;. ~ 'I! ". "rf.". ._,~-.:\. '~'.: ~' :.'........~~:~ ...,., : . . /"', " . By' // Vice:" (Official Seal) 97408,ded . . , . ,'/ .........". .'. ., <. ,} r:I/:/ I ~ ': . f'"....,..,.1. . . PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. FF.REC.BK 10029 PG 1068 \..A.N() PINELLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS LAND SURVEY DIVISION 22211 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 N. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765-2347 SECTION(S) 28, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST Additions or deletions by other than the Professionol Land Surveyor in responsible charge is prohibited. Land Description is invalid without signature and/or embossed seal of the Professional land Surveyor DESCRIPTION , All of Lot 5, together with a portion of Lots 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Block SUB-DIVISION, according to plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 30, records of Pinellas County, Florida, in Section 28, Township 28 South, Pinellas County, being described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Block 3, run S 89'3T09"E along the South line of said Block 3, for a distance of 315.67 ft. to the Southwest corner of said Lot 10, for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N 00'lT43"E along the West line of said Lots 10, 9 and 8, for a distance of 145.65 feet to the most Southerly Corner of said Lot 5; thence N 44'33'30"W, for a distance of 120.00 feet to the most Westerly Corner of said Lot 5; thence N 45'26'30"E along the Northwest line of said Lots 5 and 6, for a distance of 178.97 feet; thence S 05'Z6'12"E, for a distance of 75.11 feet; thence S OO'13'20"E, for a distance of 282.30 feet to a Point of Intersection with the South line of said Lot 10; thence N 89'3T09"W along said South line, for a distance of 52.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 24,112 sq. ft. or 0.554 acres M.O.L. BEARING BASIS: Florida State Plane Coordinate System; West Zone; North American Datum of 1927; Established by the National Oceanic Survey; Grid North. SKETCH--NOT A SURVEY "I w > <t: UJ W -.J 0:: <t: :I: U w. ~" o~ ...1/) ",- I>>'" co I/) LOT 11 O-l ~~ ( 0';; ~ ~>, 60' ~c) ll~ SCALE 1"= 60' I o 60 .... I 120 L 237+00 I 240+00 I ,\\\"11111,,. 'I.\\~\~ tL r;'I~," .:-\. ~.:-;' ...... 'j,,'. ..' ~r ." e: ". l. ") ..~ <:'. ..,~ \. 'C2tl}4-QoC> ~~.~~. _~r.. _ _~ '~::"/ll.',.!l':;t~ . c' :2 - . ': ?,4 ~ t'1 ; r l' "t~ Cr.: G; .; '::',: r." ~f.. ~ . I ~ ,: /:~ " ~., I' 'U :")' r~ ;1':",:..... L on I.... t~ " I", "..".. - ...,..' ("'\ " '.,...,~,:,.., t"\V .... 'I" 4....1..1 ,,,. .\,,\ 'I", "Ut"""\" 238-;00 239+00 CENTERLINE OF MCMULLEN-BOOTH ROAD ~E or THE SW 1/4 or THE NW 1/4 or SEC. 28-28-16 S.F.N.: DATE . LANrJ/SURVEYOR CERTIFICATE PHONE # (813) 464-8904 : 3914 SEAL CALCULATED BY: dwb CHECKED BY: C.N. 067 EXHIBIT -A- SHEET 1 OF 1 Parcel No.: F901 ~.'T"'-C',-"-'--"-~-~'~-:'--__:-_____h_.,_-'7-~'.--> .' . R'\JU"" to: (enclo$ed self,addressedstamped envelope) ~ ' . American Realty ,Tide Agency Inc. ~<lra~s: 24701'US 19.N.., Suite 102 Claerwatar.,FL 33763 . :' .,.' .,'~:.',,:> ~:~{Y':',",,'-'~':~.~ WAIl!IAfm'i:&D> .99-26030 RUG-l.I'dBS9! :!i '. '1NOl\/IO. TO INOMD' P I NE:LLAS CO SI< ,10622 - PO' e~ I............ . 9 5860485SS': 08-11-19'3'3 , .01 DEJ)-JllJCKETTE ' . RE ORBING : t . DO STAIIP." DR219 . 3 .' TOTAl: CHECK AIIT. TENDERED: 17:25:18 $6.00 $432.50 $443.50 $443.50 '. This inst{J.Jme,ntPreparad:by:CYNTHIA D.GIUNTA Amarican Realty Ti1Ia Agency Inc. 24701. US 19 N..Suita 102 ' Clearwater. FL 33763 ARTA #14468-2 . PropertY Appraisers Pare,", Identification (Folio) Numberls}: SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR PROCESSING OATA SPACE. ABOVE Tt<<S UN PLANNING: DEVELO MENT S, RVICES CITY OF CLEARWA ER 28/28/16/000361003/0040 . This Warranty [)eed MOOe the 26TH day of JULY 1999 A.D. :by RONALD J.PUCKETTE. A MARRIED PERSON hereinafter called 'the grantor. to BARRY J.. VOGEL. A MARRIED PERSON whose post office address .is. 504 WESTBOROUGH LANE, SAFETY HARBOR, FL hereinafter called thegranree: (Whereverased herein rhe !erms"grantor' and 'grantee' include all rhe parties ro rhis insrranumJ and /he . heirs. legal represenrarives and assigns of individuals. and ~he successirs and assigns of corporaJion) Witnesseth: 'l1!atthe grantor. for and in consideration of the sumlof $10.00 and other valuable co, iderations. rece. i.Pt whereof is he.rebY acknowledged. hereby grants. bargains. sells. alie1 remises. releases. conveys and ~onfirms unto the grimtee all that cenain land situate in PINELLAS County. State of Florid . viz: . Lot 4. Block 3; A..CKER'S SUBDI.VISION. acco~ding to the map l~ plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 30. Page 91. Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida,--- . SUBJECT TO easements, restrictions and reservations of record. .' .. "THIS IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD ADDRESS OF GRANTOR'S SPOUSE, BRENDA PUCKETl'E. HER ~OMESTEADADDRESSISINFACT: S"u.9";- Z-irHl'ec. A~"J Mil{'Olo\.) FL '3~S'"1u ,* ; Together, with all the te'lements. hereditaments and appunenances thereto belonging or in anywise appenaining. To Have imdto Hold, thesame in fee simple forever. And the g an/or hereby covenants with said grantee that the granwr is lawfully seized of said land inlee simple: thalthe' graillor has ,goo right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land. and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever;' and that said land is free of all encumbrances. except iaxes accruings bsequentwDecember 31. 1998. In Witn the said gran/or has signed and sealed these pres Signature RONALD J. CK 5695 ZINNIA: V MILTON, FL 32570 L>ocumentnry lax I'd. .'f.3.7-~ Q. . h,!AingllJl.. T8Il Pn. lerlt. plnelle8 CountY DeputY C" ..~ , " Printed Signature :.;~c; -: . Co =- F(f'" 7't .~ L.R2blf '7 I..:' LI J,:! . ::-;T ;.US .~TF PIC RI'V rrrr~.t LiJI~l1 tJlT I hereby Certify that on this lIay. before me.. en officer dilly. authorized to adminillter oaths and take acknowledgments. personal!y appeared ,---'. STATE OF: FLORIDA COUNTY OF:PINELLAS ...;.~.,~o...', h~J\. . . ElL.I fl-- 00 ~ O'S - f}- NARRATIVE SUPPORTING APPLICATION FOR "FLEX" DEVELOPMENT OF INFILL PARCEL AND IN SUPPORT OF LAND USE AMENDMENT 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Pinellas County acquired much of the frontage of the parcel by condemnation to widen McMullen Booth Road. As a result, the parcel is of odd and difficult geometry and without the requested approvals the site would undevelopable. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The abutting parcels are zoned office, commercial and medium density residential and the use is consistent with the land use and abutting uses. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The abutting parcels are zoned office, commercial and medium density residential and the use is consistent with the land use and abutting uses. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The abutting parcels are zoned office, commercial and medium density residential and the use is consistent with the land use and abutting uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The office use planned by the applicant will provide a need in an area of Clearwater that needs additional office space. Other locations in Clearwater will not fill this current market requirement. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate vicinity is in transition as numerous lots are vacant and ready for demolition. A new office in this location will increase overall property value in the area. 7. The design of the proposed ComprehensiveInfill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The immediate vicinity is in transition as numerous lots are vacant and ready for demolition. A new bffice in this location will increase overall property value in the area. I I 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, heibt and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The immediate vicinity is in transition as numerous lots are vacant and ready for demolition. A new office in this location will increase overall property value in the area. 1 . . 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Off-street parking is available, however, on-site parking meets current codes. 2 .. .. JAMES MARCUS VERNON Attorney at Law 1721 Rainbow Drive Clearwater, FL 33755 Reply to: P.O. Box 6474 Clearwater, FL 33758 Tel.No. (727) 447-4444 Fax No. (727) 446-6213 June 15, 2000 Mr. Ryan Givens, Planner City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Clearwater, Florida 33756 Dear Mr. Givens, Attached please :find 15 sets of signed and sealed revised site plans for the proposed office located at McMullen Booth Road and Daniel Street. I believe the plan incorporated all the changes which have been agreed to between your office and my client. This letter will also act as a formal modification to the application to request two additional variances to your code. As we discussed and agreed, an in addition to those items reflected on the plan which have been approved by your department, your department will recommend approval of the following items. 1. Payment of a fee in lieu of the construction of the walk along Daniel Street. This fee will be calculated on a square foot basis at the existing Clearwater contract rate. 2. A parking variance will be granted such that the parking spaces indicated will be approved for the 8,000 square foot building. The note on the plan also reflects that medical uses will not be allowed unless the building size is reduced to comply with the appropriate parking requirements for medical offices. The required parking for a medical use would be reduced, or varied down, an equal percentage (approximately 10%) as that variance being granted for the office use. My client is ready to post the property for the public hearings as soon as the signage is available. Please advise when the signs are ready and we will arrange to have the signs picked up at your office. Please contact me if I may be of additional help or assistance and I will look forward to seeing you at the next meeting or hearing date. Sincerely, /?11~ ~/Lj{ 1. Marcus Vemon Signed in his absence to avoid delay. n mil ;tT~~ IJ L, I' f 1.' . .... I. ~ JUII 1 . 2000 l II . jl I.; . Jl.-.j PlAN ~.~. -. ~""."..._,... NI~1 & OEVElO: "(NT SW::, ell Y OF ClEAR1,' ,:?F-.... . I W1 JMV /1h .. .. JAMES MARCUS VERNON Attorney at Law 1721 Rainbow Drive Clearwater, FL 33755 Reply to: P.O. Box 6474 Clearwater, FL 33758 Tel.No. (727) 447-4444 Fax No. (727) 446-6213 May 25, 2000 Ms. Cynthia Hardin, AICP Ms. Lisa Fierce City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle A venue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: Vogel Property. Dear Ms. Hardin and Ms. Fierce, I want to take this opportunity to thank Ms. Harding again for meeting with me last week regarding the above referenced property. I was very impressed and pleased with the information and service I received. Enclosed please find the following documents executed by Mr. Barry Vogel and Mr. James Vogel for a combined application regarding the above referenced property: Property of Barry Vogel City of Clearwater Petition for Annexation City of Clearwater Petition for Annexation Disclosure Statement City of Clearwater Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment City of Clearwater Affidavit to Authorize Agent Application for Site Plan Approval Owners of abutting property owners Narrative in support of application Property of James Vogel City of Clearwater Affidavit to Authorize Agent Application for Site Plan Approval Owners of abutting property owners Narrative in support of application .. .. HardinlFierce May 25, 2000 Page 2 Pursuant to our conversation this date, the application will be supported next week with an original survey and a traffic impact study will not be required. Thank you for your help and cooperation. r J. JMV /lh Receipt No: 1199818608 C'ate: 5/25/2000 Line Items: Case No Payments: Method Check v_C, f'1(:~ Y n 25 :t DO i CJVAf: A~iEND I.+~,u 11 UU 785.00 IUIJ_ CHU< 12351100 1.-,"7r.:- '-'I'U" ...L.';;~n:.J NQ5::':~;2J~} lii~j..:~ ~ .. Tran Code -FLEX STND -LUP AMEND Payer MARCUS VERNON Description Flexible Standard - 45,000.00 @ $0.01 Lup Amend - 78,500.00 @ $0.01 .. Revenue Account No. 010-341262 010-341263 Bank No Acct Check No 1424 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: o \Et\E~~\E my ,. H. J \ U ) , , , L. J \L--::J j PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Amount Due $450.00 $785.00 Amount Paid $1,235.00 $1,235.00 . . CHECKLIST FOR STANDARD DEVELOPMENT Name: Barry 1. Vogel Address: 2750 McMullen Booth Road Legal Description: see attached ()~ File Number: FL 00-05-17 ~~ Proposed Use: Office Zoning District: 0, Office Former Zoning District: RlOG --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSED REQUIRED OK NOT OK PLANNER: WRG 1. PERMITTED USE 2. COUNTY WIDE PLAN DENSITY: FLOOR AREA ISR 3. DISTIRCT MINIMUM STANDARDS LOT SIZE FLAG LOT (3-105) LOT WIDTH MAXIMUM HEIGHT FRONT SETBACK SIDE SETBACK REAR SETBACK # OF PARKING SPACES Office Office OK N/A .25 0.51 N/A 0.50 0.75 N/A OK OK 32,322 square feet N/A 355 feet 16 feet Parking Lot: 5 feet Building: 57 feet 10,000 square feet N/A 100 feet 30 feet 25 feet OK N/A OK OK OK: building NOT OK: parking lot NOT OK: Building NOT OK: Building NOT OK Proposed - 10 feet 20 feet Proposed - 10 feet 20 feet 23 spaces 3/1000 square feet of GF A - 24 spaces . . 4. SETBACKS: # OF FRONT YARDS Three N/A N/A CCC LINE N/A N/A N/A ENCROACHMENTS N/A N/A N/A SCENIC N/A N/A N/A BUILDING N/A N/A N/A 5. PARKING # OF SPACES 23 spaces 24 spaces NOT OK SHARED PARKING # N/A N/A OK PROTECTED TREES N/A N/A N/A ANGLE OK OK OK WIDTH OK OK OK LENGTH OK OK OK # HANDICAPPED 2 1 OK LENGTH OK OK OK WIDTH OK OK OK AISLE OK OK OK PARKING LOTS N/A N/A N/A # ENTRANCES 1 1 OK SURFACE OK OK OK WITHIN 600 FT OK OK OK STRIPING OK OK OK COMPREHENSIVE PRGM N/A N/A N/A LOADING 0 1 NOT OK WIDTH o feet 12 feet NOT OK LENGTH o feet 35 feet N/A # SPACES 0 1 NOT OK DRIVE - THROUGHS N/A N/A N/A STACKING SPACES N/A N/A N/A 6. CERTIFICATE OF CONCURRENCY APPROVED? N/A N/A N/A UNITY OF TITLE N/A N/A N/A REQUIRED? OUTDOOR LIGHTING N/A N/A N/A ~ TYPE CUTOFF? N/A N/A N/A LOCATION N/A N/A N/A HEIGHT N/A N/A N/A ~ 7. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ~ APPROVED? N/A N/A N/A 8. FLAG LOT FLAG LOT DRIVE N/A N/A N/A SEPERATION DRIVEWAY WIDTH N/A N/A N/A # OF LOTS PER DRIVE N/A N/A N/A . . PROPOSED REQUIRED OK NOT O.K. 9. ACCESSORY USE STANDARDS PRICIPLE USE EST'D? N/A N/A N/A SIZE OF PRINCIPLE USE N/A N/A N/A SIZE OF ACCESSORY USE N/A N/A N/A SIZE OF EXISTING N/A N/A N/A ACCESSORY USE 10. OUTDOOR CAFE GREATER THAN 25% N/A N/A N/A TOTAL FLOOR AREA N/A N/A N/A LOCATED IN SETBACK? N/A N/A N/A AMPLIFIED MUSIC? N/A N/A N/A HOURS OF OPERATION? N/A N/A N/A 11. DOCKS HARBORMASTER APP'D? N/A N/A N/A DEVIATIONS APP'D BY N/A N/A N/A HARBORMASTER SETBACK N/A N/A N/A LENGTH N/A N/A N/A WIDTH N/A N/A N/A TIE POLES N/A N/A N/A BOATLIFT SETBACK N/A N/A N/A # OF SLIPS 60 N/A OK SEAWALL ELEVEA TION N/A N/A N/A LANDSCAPING: 1. PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS # OF TREES SIZE # OF SPECIES GRADE # OF SHRUBS SIZE GRADE 2. INTERIOR REQUIREMENTS FOUNDATION PLANTING SQUARE FEET # OF TREES SIZE # OF SPECIES GRADE # OF SHRUBS SIZE GRADE GROUNDCOVER ~ ~ ~ . . LANDSCAPING CONT. 3. SCENIC CORRIDOR 4. IRRIGATION SYSTEM 5. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPROVED? 6. CLEARING PERMIT FIRE MARSHALL 1. FIRE LANE 2. EMERGENCY ACCESS TRAFFIC ENG 1. ACCESS CLASSIFICATION DRIVEWAY SPACING MEDIAN SPACING REDUCED BY DIRECTOR? SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE 2. JOINT & CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT? RECORDED EASEMENT SUBMITTED? 3. TRAFFIC STUDY APPROVED? 4.0UTPARCEL ACCESS STANDARDS # OF OUTPARCELS PROPOSED? CIVIL ENG 1. EROSION CONTROL APPROVED? 2. STORMWATER DETENTION 3. SIDEWALK 4. DRIVEWAY PROPOSED REQUIRED O.K. NOT ~ ~ ----' . . OK SOLID WASTE 1. MECHANICAL SCREENING SCREENED ON 4 SIDES SIZE OK PARKING SPACE REUCTION? LOCATION . . DRAFT CDB Meeting Date: July 18. 2000 Case Number: FL 00-05-18 Agenda Item: II CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNER: Barry 1. Vogel REPRESENTA TIVE: 1. Marcus Vernon, Esq. LOCATION: 2750 McMullen Booth Road REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 14 feet (Charles Avenue), reduce the front setback from 25 feet to five feet along McMullen Booth Road, and reduce the side setbacks from 20 feet to 10 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and Com- prehensive Landscape Program. PLANS REVIEWED: Site plan prepared by Walker & Associates Architects P.A. SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.742 acres DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 355 feet by 244 feet deep PROPERTY USE: Current use: Proposed use: Vacant Office PLAN CATEGORIES: ZONING DISTRICTS: 0, Office ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Convenience Store South: _ East: Residential DRAFT Page 1 . . West: Residential CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity of the site primarily includes low density to medium density residential units with the exception of a high intensity convenience store located to the north. ANALYSIS: The 0.74-acre site is irregularly shaped with 355 feet of frontage on McMullen Booth Road. The site also has 244 feet of frontage on Daniel Street and 52.29 feet of frontage on Charles Avenue. The site presently contains a single family residences to the rear of the property, a portion that was recently added. The area facing McMullen Booth Road is vacant and overgrown with strubbery. In addition, the site does contain several mature oak trees. The property generally surrounded by residential with the exception of a convenience store to the north. McMullen Booth Road serves as a major arterial without a defined streetscape character. The applicant is proposing to develop an 8,000 square feet office building as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The proposal will eliminate the existing single-family residence in order to maximize the development potential of the site. The one-story building will be 16 feet in height and will have a flat roof The predominant color of the buildings will be _and the accent color will be _ The landscape plan provided generally meets the intent of the Code. Staff recommends some further improvements. The applicant has not yet submitted an application for slgnage. A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN THE 0, OFFICE DISTRICT: STANDARD REQUIRED/ PERMITTED .50 EXISTING FAR 0.00 PROPOSED IN COMPLIANCE? .025 Yes DRAFT Page 2 . . B. FLEXffiILITY STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE 0, OFFICE DISTRICT: STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? LOT AREA 10,000 square 10,000 square 32,322 square Yes minimum feet feet feet LOT WIDTH 100 feet 355 feet 355 feet Yes minimum HEIGHT 30 feet 16 feet Yes maximum FRONT YARD 25 feet 18 feet - Daniel 5 feet - No* SETBACK Street McMullen minimum Booth; 15 feet- Charles Avenue; 25 feet - Daniel Street SIDE YARD 20 feet 7 feet - existing 10 feet No* SETBACK building minimum PARKING 3 spaces/1, 000 2 spaces 23 spaces No* SPACES square feet of minimum GF A (24 soaces) IMPERVIOUS 0.75 0.06 0.51 Yes SURFACE AREA * Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects allow flexibility from all standards of the Code. c. FLEXmILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The applicant has claimed the subject site is unable to be reasonably development under current Code requirements due to the site's odd shape and size. The applicant further explained that the Pinellas County, under condemnation to widen McMullen Booth Road, ultimately created the odd lot as seen today. Under a thorough review, staff has concluded the site would need deviations from current Code requirements to enable reasonable development of this parcel. Page 3 . . 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; The abutting properties consist of office, commercial and residential uses. The abutting residential uses are in fair condition, whereas, new office development would improve the aesthetic character of the area. In addition, the proposed office building will not house problematic uses that would otherwise reduce the desirability of the area. The applicant has suggested that the proposed office building will be high quality and be aesthetically pleasing. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; The proposed office building is permitted in the Office District as well as several other zoning districts. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses; The proposed office building is compatible with adjacent land uses and is not classified as a problematic use. Additional landscaping will buffer surrounding residential uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The applicant has stated that there is need for additional office space in this specific area of Clearwater; and thus, the proposed office building may satisfy such need. In addition, the applicant desires a site with frontage onto a major arterial. The applicant claims there are no other parcels in the vicinity to support the proposed office development. While there may be other parcels in the vicinity their old shape and size may pose similar development problems as the subject site. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; The applicant claims the immediate vicinity is in transition as numerous lots are vacant and ready for demolition, and thus, new office development will increase property values in the area. The claim that lots are ready for demolition is debatable; however, the area is in need for aesthetic improvement. The streetscape of McMullen Booth contains several vacant, overgrown lots and does not contain a defined street character. Development of the site in a well-designed manner will create a more preferred street appearance. DRAFT Page 4 . . 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; The applicant claims the immediate vicinity contains numerous lots that are ready for demolition and new office development would improve the overall area. The applicant has not fully justified this criterion; however, staff has defined other benefits to the proposed development. Presently, McMullen Booth Road does not have a defined street character where each parcel complements the style and appearance of the next. The proposed office development may help establish a better design for this main transportation corridor of the City and could serve as a catalyst for future redevelopment. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; The applicant continues to claim the immediate vicinity contains numerous lots that are ready for demolition and new office development would improve the overall area. Staff has concluded that flexibility in setbacks and off-street parking is needed in order to facilitate redevelopment along McMullen Booth Road. While the area is need of an improved streetscape, irregular-shaped lots make it difficult to foster desired redevelopment. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. This proposed office building will not contain multiple uses, and thus, is not required under Code to enter into a shared parking agreement. D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on June 7, 2000. The applicant has worked with staff to provide an attractive, well-designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The proposal is in compliance with the provisions of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and the resulting site plan will contain several attractive elements. Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application for the site at 2750 McMullen Booth Road, subject to the following conditions: Page 5 DR4J:r . . I) That a revised landscape plan that meets or exceeds the requirements of Code be submitted, subject to staff approval, prior to the issuance of any permits; and 2) That the site plan reflect an increased landscaped buffer along McMullen Booth Road; and 3) That the office building have windows or architectural interest on all sides; and 4) That no vehicular access be present on McMullen Booth Road; and 5) That sidewalks are provided along Daniel Street and Charles Street. Prepared by: W. Ryan Givens, Planner: ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S:\Planning Department\C D BIFLEX\Pending ApplicationslMcMullen 2750 VogellMcMullen 2750 STAFF REPORT. doc Page 6 . . 5. Case LUZ 00-05-05 - 110 McMullen Booth Road. First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc., Owner/Applicant; Larry Ponder, Administrator/Representative. Request: 1) Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban Category (County) to I, Institutional Category (Clearwater), and 2) rezoning from AE, Agriculture/Estate District (County) to I, Institutional District (Clearwater) ACTION: Approved. 6. Case LUZ 00-05-06 - 19034 US 19N. Bradford-Scott Corp. .of Florida, Owner/Applicant. Jason Lesser, Coastal Builders, Inc., Representative. Request: 1) Land Use Plan amendment from CG, Commercial General Category to RH, Residential High Category, and 2) rezoning from C, Commercial District to MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District ACTION: Approved. 7. Case: Text Amendment TA 00-06-04. Request: Amendments to the Community Development Code regarding residential rental property, signage, publicly-owned facilities, parking in residential areas, news racks, and portable storage units ACTION: Approved, except for fence amendment. 8. Case ANX 00-05-10 - 2755 Daniel Street. Barry J. Vogel, Owner/applicant. Marcus Vernon, Representative. Request: Annexation of 0.18 acres into the City ACTION: Approved. 9. Case LUZ 00-05-07 - 2755 Daniel Street. Barry J. Vogel, Owner/applicant. Marcus Vernon, Representative. Request: 1) Land Use plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban Category (County) to R/OG, Residential/Office General Category (Clearwater), and 2) rezoning from R-3District (County) to 0, Office District (Clearwater) ACTION: Approved. ITEM 4 - LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS 1. Case FL 00-05-17 - 2750 McMullen Booth Road. Barry J. Vogel, Owner/applicant. Marcus Vernon, Representative. Request: 1) Flexible Development approval 1) to reduce the front setback from 25 to 10 feet (Charles Avenue); 2) reduce the front setback from 25 to 7 feet (McMullen Booth Road); 3) reduce the front setback from 25 to 24 feet (Daniel Street); 4) reduce the side setbacks from 20 to 5 feet; and 5) reduce the required number of parking spaces from 24 to 22 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: An 8,000 square foot office building ACTION: Approved, with conditions: 1) The landscape plan be further revised to include a tiered effect along McMullen Booth Road, as provided through a landscape easement within the right-of-way, and that the agreement with Pinellas County for same be finalized prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2) if the agreement to landscape the right-of- way is not secured, the landscape plan be amended to exceed Code requirements, to the satisfaction of staff, in an equal monetary equivalent as if the landscaping easement had been Mcd0700.ag 2 07/18/00 " ~ . . Vo~<u\ ~ FL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING CITY OF CLEARWATER July 18, 2000 Present: Edward Mazur, Jr. David Gildersleeve William Johnson Shirley Moran Carlen A. Petersen Alex Plisko Absent: Gerald Figurski Also Present: Leslie Dougall-Sides Ralph Stone Lisa Fierce Brenda Moses Etim Udoh Gary Jones Gina Clayton Ryan Givens Mark Parry Acting Chair/Board Member Board Member Board Member Board Member Board Member Board Member Chair Assistant City Attorney Planning Director Development Review Manager Board Reporter Senior Planner Senior Planner Senior Planner Planner Planner The Acting Chair called the meeting to order at 1 :00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. ITEM A - REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCES/RECONSIDERATION - None. ITEM B - CONTINUED ITEMS Item B 1 -18524 US 19 North Brad Baldwin, Owner; Parsley Baldwin Realty, Applicant; Bryan L. Zarlenga, Representative. Request: Flexible Development approval of a self- storage establishment with a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 135 to 40 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. Proposed Use: A 71,250 square foot mini-storage development. FL 00-03-09 This case was continued by the CDB (Community Development Board) at the May 16, 2000, meeting to enable the applicant to address issues related to the sanitary sewer, building elevations, and parking as it relates to the adjacent Le Cher office complex. The site is generally undeveloped, although there is an existing 24-foot asphalt driveway along the west and south property lines that provides access to adjacent properties. The 3.11- acre site is L-shaped with 200 feet of frontage on Nursery Road and 122 feet of frontage on US 19 North. It includes two separate parcels that will be combined through Unity of mcd0700 1 07/18/00 ,{ . . Title. The site includes both Office and Commercial zoning districts. Staff and the applicant met with representatives from the neighboring Le Cher office complex on numerous occasions. The applicant addressed concerns raised regarding the sewer, building architecture and parking to the satisfaction of staff. The proposal includes the development of a self-storage business with five buildings. The applicant submitted revised plans including a relocated sanitary sewer easement with gravity sewer, revised landscape plan, and conceptual building elevation along the west property line. To accommodate the relocated sewer easement, a portion of the south western most building (building #3) has been reduced by 2,650 square feet. Building #1, at the US 19 entrance, has been increased in area by the same square footage. The revised the site plan also will: 1) provide a 10-foot buffer area within which new oak trees will be planted; 2) include a mansard roof to Buildings #3 and #5; and 3) incorporate a stucco finish exterior with neutral colors on both buildings. Based on research of the adjacent office complex, removal of the nearly 16 parking spaces on this site will not result in a parking deficit for the Le Cher development. The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval for a self-storage establishment, and with all applicable standards of the Community Development Code. Staff recommends approval of the proposed project with conditions: 1) Proof of Unity of Title be submitted prior to the issuance of any permits; 2) the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the plans as submitted; 3) signage comply with Code; 4) oak trees, crepe myrtles, and viburnum hedge be planted along the west side of buildings #3 and #5, as shown on the landscape plan; and 5) the design of the south side of building #3 and north side of building #5 be consistent with the west elevations of those buildings. Roger Larson, representative, said as the property is L-shaped, limited uses can be applied to this property. The applicant is proposing a reduction of parking spaces from the 135 minimum to 40 spaces. One entrance to the site is at Nursery Road and the other is on US19N. The parcel is 3.11 acres, of which .5 acres is zoned Office and the balance is Commercial. The passive portion of the property includes the retention area and offices. The applicant requests to construct two one-story buildings, two two-story buildings, and one building that is partially one and two-stories, totally 71,250 square feet. There will be approximately 600 storage units, 400 of which will be air-conditioned. The project is aesthetically and architecturally pleasing to the surrounding community, particularly to the office complexes to the west and south. Thirty-eight (38) additional trees will be planted. The project meets or exceeds all the standards in the Code that pertain to self-storage use under the flexibility criteria sections, except for parking requirements. An easement exists which was granted by the applicant years ago to allow ingress and egress to the existing offices along the west and south sides of the site abutting the existing offices. The applicant does not propose to change that easement. Maintenance, repair, and replacement of the easement is the obligation of the office condominium association or those using the property. The easement is in common with the applicant's property and can be used by him. The Comprehensive Infill requirement in the Code requires a minimum of one space per 1,000 square feet. The applicant is requesting 40 parking spaces. The Institute of Transportation Engineers statistics indicate that 178 trips per day is consistent with a project of this size. The applicant anticipates that between 7 - 8 cars will be on the property at any given time. Therefore, the 40 spaces, including the mcd0700 2 07/18/00 . . handicapped space, is more than ample to avoid off-street parking. The applicant concurs with staff's recommendations. In response to a question, Bryan Zarlenga, Tampa Bay Engineering, said the retention pond is sized to handle this project plus runoff to the west. Mary Ellen Wilson, partial owner, said she owns the property facing US 19N. She said although other interest in the property has been expressed, this project is the first that is compatible with the surrounding area. This project is important to her as her husband's office is part of this project. She referred to current photographs of the site. One resident spoke in opposition of the project. In response to concerns from a resident, it was noted that the exterior finish of the buildings will be stucco, not metal, as indicated in the applicant's application. Planning Director Ralph Stone said the setback requirements for the easement differs from right-of- way setbacks. The new Code does not reference setback from the right-of-way line. Code defines the "setback" as follows: "setback means required horizontal distance between a property line and a structure". He said the resident is characterizing. the private easement as a right-of-way. He disagreed with the resident's interpretation of a private easement being the same as a road right-of-way. Mr. Stone said private easements could take many forms and function as a driveway. The general characterization of "right-of- way" is one that is for the benefit of the public, regardless of its form. In this case, staff feels the driveway exists for the benefit of the owners of the office condominium association as an access easement, and does not meet the definition of a public right-of- way. Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides said the COB (Community Development Board) must refer to current Code when deciding a case. Max Battle stated he was not in favor or against the application. He was a former Public Works Director and City Engineer. He questioned the definition of a private road versus a driveway. He said at the time the easement was granted, it was called a private roadway. The reason it was not called a private right-of-way was because a right-of-way infers it is for the general public to use. He feels this is an access easement for a private roadway which gives the owners the right to close the road off at any time. A right-of- way cannot be closed at will. He said at the time the easement was granted, the County would not grant the owner a building permit unless he had road frontage. Frank Kunnen, former developer of the property, agreed with Mr. Battle's interpretation of the easement language referencing the use of the roadway. The County required the original site plan for the development have a roadway prior to annexation. He said the owners in this development have a public sewer easement with a sewer line, not a private one. This property was originally one ownership with a roadway. Upon acquisition, other owners were assured by the owner, County, and City that the easement was to be kept as a road right-of-way easement. He stated he was required as a developer to set back the office buildings on either side of the road from the right-of-way easement. mcd0700 3 07/18/00 . . Mr. Larson confirmed that the exterior of the buildings will include a stucco finish, with earth-tone colors, and false windows. He said there is sufficient space between the proposed buildings and the current ones. The two easements recorded in the public records are private and designed exclusively for internal traffic and for ingress and egress. The land can be used as the owners see fit as long as it does not impede the ingress and egress. He felt a right-of-way and a property line have specific meanings. He said a setback is the horizontal distance between the property line and a structure. He agrees with staff's interpretation of the Code. He said under the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project category none of the rights-of-way and setbacks are applicable. He said traffic generated by the nearby McDonalds is much greater than the proposed project will generate. The self-storage establishment will be open from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Between 5:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. a card access is required and patrons cannot access the gates after 9:00 p.m. The applicant is basically proposing a reduction in the number of parking spaces. In response to a question, Mr. Larson said if the easement is deemed a private roadway and setbacks are required, the site becomes undevelopable. Member Johnson moved to approve the Flexible Development application for a self- storage establishment within the Commercial District, with a reduction in the required number of parking spaces, from 135 spaces to 40 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, for the site at 18524 US 19 North, subject to the following conditions: 1) Proof of Unity of Title be submitted prior to the issuance of any permits; 2) the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the plans as submitted including the use of an exterior stucco finish; 3) signage comply with Code; 4) oak trees, crepe myrtles, and viburnum hedge be planted along the west side of buildings #3 and #5, as shown on the landscape plan; and 5) the design of the south side of building #3 and north side of building #5 be consistent with the west elevations of those buildings. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM C - LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS Item C1 - 1765 Saint Croix Drive, approximately 600 feet north of Saint John Drive. Jeanette Elaine Harvey-Evans, Owner/Applicant. Request: 1) Annexation of 0.17 acres to the City; 2) Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban Classification (County) to RU, Residential Urban Classification (Clearwater); and 3) rezoning from R-3, Residential, Single-Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater). ANX 00-05-08 The property owner has requested this annexation in order to receive sewer service. The property will have a land use plan designation of Residential Urban and is proposed to be zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District. The subject site is a single-family residential home. The annexation of the property will eliminate an existing enclave in this subdivision. The applicant is currently receiving water from Pinellas County and will continue to do so. Sewer service will be provided by the City and capacity for the project is available for this utility. The applicant has paid the applicable sewer impact fee and is aware of the additional cost to extend sewer service to the property. Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City. The proposed annexation mcd0700 4 07!1 8/00 . . will have no adverse effect on public facilities and their level of service. The proposed annexation is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Countywide Plan, and with Florida law. Staff recommends approval. Member Petersen moved for the COB to recommend approval of 1) The annexation; 2) the Residential Urban Plan category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan; and 3) of the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code for property at 1765 Saint Croix Drive. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Item C2 - 1590 Gulf Boulevard, generally located on the west side of Gulf Boulevard, approximately 300 feet south of Marina Del Ray. Legally described as a portion of the South 474.02 feet of Government lot 2, lying within Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida. (MB 34/011) - Belleview Biltmore Properties, Inc., Owner/Applicant; Harry Cline, Esquire, Representative. Request: 1) Land Use Plan amendment from CG, Commercial General Category to RH, Residential High Category; and 2) rezoning from C, Commercial District to HDR, High Density Residential District. LUZ 00-05-08 Member Mazur declared a conflict of interest and did not participate in discussions or the vote. Member Gildersleeve served as Acting Chair. The owner/applicant requests to amend the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map from Commercial General (CG) to Residential High (RH), and to rezone from the Commercial (C) district to the High-Density Residential (HDR) district. This plan amendment and rezoning application are requested by the property owner to build a multifamily residential development which is not permitted except as a component of a mixed-use development in the Commercial Zoning District. The subject site involves 41,838 square feet, or .96 acres, and includes a vacant restaurant. The vacant Cabana Club Restaurant is located immediately adjacent to the Cabana Club Condominium development and was constructed in the early 1980's. The restaurant was constructed initially as a clubhouse and "members only" restaurant for the condominiums, but was sold in the early 1990's and operated as a public restaurant. The restaurant has declined to a substandard condition and is not operational. This parcel historically has been designated commercial by the City. The Countywide Future Plan Rules allow residential development of 24 units per acre and 38 transient units such as hotel rooms or times hares in the Commercial General Future Land Use category. There are 23 dwelling units allowed on the subject site through the Commercial General Land Use category. However, the Clearwater Community Development Code does not allow dwelling units outside of a mixed-use development in the Commercial Zoning District. The net difference or gain of units by amending the Future Land Use Plan from the Commercial General to Residential High classification is 5 units, and will be an insignificant increase in potential density. The subject site is located within a Coastal High Hazard Area which is defined as evacuation areas for a Category 1 hurricane. However, the Plan Amendment will not require additional infrastructure to accommodate the development. The parcel has already been developed and cleared of vegetation. The subject site is the only parcel on Sand Key mcd0700 5 07!1 8/00 . . with a Commercial General Future Land Use classification and Commercial Zoning. Residential High is the predominate Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) designation on private property on Sand Key. The proposed amendment for multifamily use is in keeping with the overall character of Sand Key and adjacent parcels. The proposed land use amendment is compatible with surrounding uses. The proposal is consistent with the City and Countywide Comprehensive plans and will not adversely affect public services, is compatible with the natural environment, and is consistent with the development regulations of the City. Staff recommends approval of: 1) Amending the Future Land Use Plan designation from Commercial General to Residential High, and 2) amending the zoning district designation from Commercial (C) to High Density Residential (HDR) at1590 Gulf Boulevard (MB 34/011). In response to a question, Senior Planner Gary Jones said the owner can build 28 units on this site. He said there will be no impact on fire and police services. Harry Cline, representative, said the applicant proposed to eliminate commercial zoning and commercial land use and replace it with High Density Residential zoning which is consistent with the surrounding area. In response to a question, Mr. Cline said the applicant could build 50 timeshare units with an accessory restaurant on the site. Mr. Stone said the maximum square footage the site would support is 23,000 square feet, subject to site considerations. A fast-food restaurant would support 3,000 square feet. Other uses that might be permitted on this commercially zoned site include government uses, indoor and outdoor recreation, marinas, offices, hotels, motels, churches, restaurants, alcoholic beverage sales, etc. Timothy Johnson stated he represents an unincorporated association known as SOB (Save our Beach) on Sand Key, comprised of residents of Dan's Island Condominium, the Harbour, and Isle of Sand Key Condominium and requested party status under Code Section 4-206(d). Ms. Dougall-Sides said Code provides for granting of party status if the individual demonstrates he/she is a substantially affected person by the application. The party could cross-examine witnesses and present exhibits versus just making comments. It was remarked that the CDB prefers to hear comments from residents first. The CDB reserved a ruling on the party status request. Mr. Johnson said the applicant's request will result in diminished quality of life and devalued property values for surrounding residents. He said the proposal fails to meet several Code requirements and requested the CDB deny the request. Nineteen (19) persons spoke in opposition of the application, including Mr. Johnson. In response to a question, one person said he did not know how the majority of people residing in the Cabana Club felt about the application. In response to a question, another person said their Realtor, not the City, told them that the 70-foot view corridor for their building would never be removed. mcd0700 6 07 J1 8/00 . . Ms. Dougall-Sides said as testimony has been heard from Save our Beach on Sand Key members indicating how they were substantially affected by the application, the CDB could rule on Mr. Johnson's request for party status. Member Petersen moved to recognize Timothy Johnson as the representative for the Save Our Beach on Sand Key. The motion was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken Members Plisko, Gildersleeve, Johnson, Moran, and Petersen voted "aye"; Member Mazur abstained. Motion carried. Ms. Dougall-Sides reminded the CDB that its rules require that the concurring vote of at least 4 members is required to take any action on an application and if a decision results in a 3:2 vote, the case will automatically be continued to the next meeting for a decision. Mr. Stone said staff must give the applicant and the public objective recommendations regardless of the interest in the application. He said the comment about the height between commercial and high-density residential structures was incorrect. In a standard Commercial (C) district, 25 feet is permitted and High-Density Residential permits 30 feet, a difference of 5 feet. At the upper end, HDR permits up to 80 feet in height; and Commercial permits 50 feet, a difference of 30 feet. Staff feels decisions about changes and land use and zoning are needed to ensure compatibility with uses in the High Density Residential District. He felt that a Commercial zoning in this area of Sand Key is a mistake. Staff feels this change is appropriate for the area. Staff's recommendation is not based on what might be done, but what the potential for districts might allow. The issue of a view corridor to surrounding residents is always a predominant issue that staff understands, but that is not part of the application. In response to a question, Mr. Stone said staff does not know how the properties and development potentials were divided, however it appears development rights exist on the portion zoned Commercial that are independent of the rest of the project. In response to a question, Mr. Stone said he thought although Sand Key has no fire station, fire service is stationed on Sand Key. In any city there are always limitations on how high fire service personnel can reach on a tall building. Normally, that issue is dealt with in terms of building codes and sprinkler systems. Density of the project proposed is dealt with through land use category and zoning districts which in this case permits 28 units. Mr. Cline said the applicant is constructing a project of "like kind and quality" although the heights may be different than surrounding properties. Dan's Island has 11 stories, the Cabana Club has 9 stories, and Isle of Sand Key has 17 stories. He said if the logic of protecting the view over someone else's land was followed, there would be only one building on Sand Key. He said there is no vested right in zoning. He felt the applicant's request is fair and reasonable. In response to a question, Tim Johnson said a maximum of 50 feet in height in Commercial and a maximum of 130 feet in High Density Residential is permitted. The Save our Beach on Sand Key does not feel the applicant can meet the criteria for an infill on a commercial development to increase the height to 50 feet. mcd0700 7 07/18/00 . . Discussion ensued and it was remarked that homeowners purchased their condominiums knowing the subject property was commercially zoned. It was remarked that a restaurant in this location will greatly affect the traffic. It was commented that based on the testimony heard, the project would negatively impact the community. Member Petersen moved that based on the testimony and staff report at this public hearing for the COB to recommend denial of the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map from Commercial General (CG) to Residential High (RH) and to rezoned from the Commercial (C) district to the High Density Residential (HDR) district for property at 1590 Gulf Boulevard. The motion was c}uly seconded. Upon the vote being taken, Members Johnson, Moran, Plisko, and Petersen voted "aye"; Member Gildersleeve voted "nay"; Member Mazur abstained. Motion carried. The meeting recessed from 3:42 to 3:52 p.m. Item C3 - Kings Highway and Sunset Point Road, generally located on the southeast corner of Kings Highway and Sunset Point Road. Legally described as Lots Band C, Brentwood Estates Subdivision. Highpoint Investments, Inc., Owner/Applicant. Donald McFarland, Representative. Request: 1) Land Use Plan amendment from R/OG, Residential/Office General Category to RH, Residential High Category; and 2) rezoning from 0, Office District to MHDR, Medium Density Residential District. LUZ 00-05-04 This plan amendment and rezoning application are requested by the property owner to build apartments since infill development is not allowed in the Office zoning District. The subject site involves two lots totaling 39,000 square feet or .89 acres which currently is vacant. The proposed use is an apartment complex. The proposed use is consistent with the City and Countywide Comprehensive plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not adversely affect public services, is compatible with the natural environment, and is consistent with the development regulations of the City. Staff recommends approval of 1) Amending the Future Land Use Plan designation from Residential/Office General to Residential High; and 2) amending the Zoning District designation of 1871 Kings Highway (Lots Band C, Brentwood Estates Subdivision) from Office (0) to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR). Donald McFarland, representative, said the applicant agrees with the staff report. He plans to construct a small apartment complex on the site. Member Johnson moved that based on the testimony heard and staff report for the COB to recommend approval of the request to 1) Amend the Future Land Use Plan designation from Residential/Office General to Residential High; and 2) amend the Zoning District designation from Office (0) to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) for property at 1871 Kings Highway (Lots Band C, Brentwood Estates Subdivision). The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. mcd0700 8 07/18/00 . . Item C4 - 110 McMullen Booth Road, generally located on the southwest corner of McMullen Booth Road and Drew Street. Legally described as the north three-fourths of the north one-half of the N.W. % of the N.W. % of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East. (MB 22/01). First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc., Owner/Applicant; Larry Ponder, Administrator/Representative. Request: Annexation of 11.81 acres into the City. ANX 00-05-09 AND Item C5 -110 McMullen Booth Road, generally located on the southwest corner of McMullen Booth Road and Drew Street. Legally described as the north three-fourths of the north one-half of the N.W. % of the N.W. % of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 16 East. (MB 22/01). First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc., Owner/Applicant; Larry Ponder, Administrator/Representative. Request: 1) Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban Category (County) to I, Institutional Category (Clearwater), and 2) rezoning from AE, Agriculture/Estate District (County) to I, Institutional District (Clearwater) . The property owner requests annexation of the property at 110 McMullen Booth Road. This property has a pending case being processed concurrently that proposes to change the Future Land Use Plan category to Institutional and zoning district to Institutional. This annexation involves one lot approximately 514,444 square feet or 11.81 acres which is currently vacant. A church and support facilities have been proposed for this site. The proposed annexation will not adversely effect City services. The applicants are aware of the required impact fees and other additional costs associated with the extension of sewer service to the site. The proposed annexation is consistent with Florida Law, he Community Development Code, and City regulations. Staff recommends approval of the annexation. Member Gildersleeve stated he and Mr. Ponder have discussed this matter as he is a member of the Church. He indicated he has no personal interest in the project. mcd0700 9 07!1 8/00 . . The plan amendment and rezoning application are requested by the property owner to redesignate property currently vacant to allow construction of a church and support facilities. Site plan considerations will be addressed in more detail during the development review process. The Pinellas Planning Council and Florida Department of Community Affairs will review this case which is a threshold amendment for both agencies. The proposed use is along the McMullen Booth scenic corridor which is designed residential which allows Institutional uses. The proposed Institutional Future land use category and Institutional Zoning District is consistent with the City and Countywide Comprehensive plans, compatible with the surrounding area, does not adversely affect public services, is compatible with the natural environment, and is consistent with the development regulations of the City. Staff recommends approval of: 1) Amending the Future Land Use Plan designation from Residential Urban (RU) to Institutional (I), and 2) amending the zoning district designation from County zoning to Institutional (I) for property at 110 McMullen Booth Road (MB 22/01). In response to a question, Mr. Jones said during peak hours traffic could impact the surrounding area. Larry Ponder, Administrator of First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc., said the church intends to relocate from downtown to the new site at 110 McMullen Booth Road. He feels the site will provide sufficient parking. The church will hire off-duty police officers to control traffic. Member Gildersleeve moved to recommend approval of Case ANX 00-05-09. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Member Gildersleeve moved to recommend approval of Case LUZ 00-05-05. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Item C6 - 19034 US 19N, generally located on the west side of U.S. Highway 19 North, 440 feet south of the Ham Boulevard intersection. Legally described as Lot 1, Bradford Court Subdivision. Bradford-Scott Corp. of Florida, Owner/Applicant. Jason Lesser, Coastal Builders, Inc., Representative. Request: 1) Land Use Plan amendment from CG, Commercial General Category to RH, Residential High Category, and 2) rezoning from C, Commercial District to MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District. LUZ 00-05-06 The applicant requests to amend the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map from Commercial General (CG) to Residential High (RH), and to rezone from the Commercial (C) district to the Medium High-Density Residential (MHDR) district. The property owner plans to build multifamily residential since the Commercial Zoning District does not permit multifamily residential development outside of a mixed-use development. The subject site involves 187,744 square feet or 4.31 acres which currently is vacant. The Pinellas Planning Council will review this case and Florida Department of Community Affairs as a threshold case. The proposed use is consistent with the City and Countywide Comprehensive plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, will not adversely affect public services, is compatible with the natural environment, and is consistent with the mcd0700 10 07/18/00 . . development regulations of the City. The level of service for US 19 will not be degraded. Staff recommends approval of 1) Amending the Future Land Use Plan designation of 19034 U.S. Highway 19 (Lot 1, Bradford Court Subdivision) from Commercial General to Residential High, and 2) amending the Zoning District designation of 19034 U.S. Highway 19 (Lot 1, Bradford Court Subdivision) from Commercial (C) to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR). Jason Lesser, applicant's partner, said the applicant agrees with the staff report. Member Johnson moved for the COB to recommend approval of the request to 1) Amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of 19034 U.S. Highway 19 (Lot 1, Bradford Court Subdivision) from Commercial General to Residential High, and 2) amend the Zoning District designation of 19034 U.S. Highway 19 (Lot 1, Bradford Court Subdivision) from Commercial (C) to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR). The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM C7 - Text Amendment Request: Amendments to the Community Development Code regarding residential rental property, signage, publicly-owned facilities, parking in residential areas, newsracks, and portable storage units. TA 00-06-04 When reviewing Ordinance Number 6526-00, Comprehensive Amendments to the Community Development Code, the City Commission deferred action on several issues that were either proposed in Ordinance Number 6526-00 or brought forward by citizens. The following issues were deferred or recommended for further review until the July 20, 2000, Commission meeting: 1) Regulations restricting the renting of residential property; 2) regulations regarding the permitted duration of portable storage units on property and the need to provide different regulations for residential and non-residential property, and the allowance of two signs instead of one on portable storage units; 3) the amount of permitted window signage; 4) the regulation of temporary sign coverings; and 5) the prohibition of parking on landscaped areas in front setbacks in residentially zoned districts. Staff is requesting that four other amendments not discussed at either June meeting be considered: 1) Whether to permit roofed structures on publicly owned boardwalks, observation platforms, and elevated nature trails; 2) to establish newsracks on publicly owned property not in compliance with Code requirements as a nuisance; 3) to revise the purpose statement of the nonconforming provisions; and 4) to reduce the amount of time allotted for compliance for nuisance violations from ten to five days. The COB discussed and made a recommendation at its workshop and public hearing earlier this year on the six month Code update regarding amendments related to renting residential property, portable storage units, and parking on the grass. It is in the Board's discretion whether to discuss and entertain comment on these issues again. The Commission deferred the renting of residential property to allow staff more time to work with stakeholders, initially took out the prohibition of parking in landscaped areas in front yards then put it back in, and passed the amendment regarding portable storage units but asked staff to research it further and propose further revisions. It was remarked that although staff has further reviewed the items previously reviewed by the COB, no changes were mcd0700 11 07/18/00 . . made, except for allowing for additional on-site time for storage on commercial properties in the portable storage units amendment. One member requested the record reflect that although in the minority vote, she is still opposed to the amendment to the renting of residential property. Staff is requesting the COB's input regarding other amendments: 1) Window signs; 2) temporary sign coverings/grand opening signs; 3) publicly owned boardwalks/observation platforms; 4) news racks; 5) nonconformity provisions; and 6) enforcement proceedings. Staff is proposing to amend the existing window sign provision that restricts window signage to 20% of the window area on which the sign is located, or 4 square feet, whichever is less. Staff is proposing that window signage be permitted up to 8 square feet in area provided that 25% of the window area on which the sign is located is not exceeded. The amendment also imposed a maximum amount of window signage of 24 square feet so that window signage does not exceed the amount of attached signage that is allowed. The proposed increase in permitted window signage also should accommodate the periodic event sign (i.e. for special sales) which was deleted from Section 3-1805(C). In response to the recent increased use of temporary sign coverings such as toaster covers, sign socks, and sign boots, staff is proposing to address this issue in Section 3-1805(C) which regulates temporary signs. Staff originally proposed to prohibit toaster covers to encourage a business to install a new sign. At the June 1, 2000, meeting, the Commission directed staff to permit temporary coverings for grand openings for new businesses or for business name changes and this has been added to the ordinance. A provision also was added which imposes a time restriction of 30 days after the issuance of an occupational license. Staff also is proposing to eliminate the temporary sign that is permitted once a year for "periodic events". In response to a question, Senior Planner Gina Clayton said staff did not talk to the business community, but spoke to neighborhood advocates. Staff is proposing to add a new subsection (M) to Section 3-601 of the ordinance. This amendment would permit roofed structures on publicly owned boardwalks, observation platforms, elevated nature trails, and other such structures not intended for use as a dock facility. The proposed provision also prohibits the use of vertical walls. The purpose of this amendment is to give flexibility to the City when erecting or retrofitting such facilities. Staff is proposing to expand the nuisance provisions regarding newsracks in Section 3-1 503(B) (12). The current Code requirement declares newsracks and vending machines a nuisance if located in a manner that causes imminent danger or is otherwise unsafe. Staff is proposing to expand this to include any newsrack on public property not in compliance with the newsrack requirements to be a nuisance. The proposed amendment would provide code enforcement officers the ability to remove noncompliant racks after sufficient notice is given to the owner and it is not removed. mcd0700 12 07/18/00 . . Staff is proposing to revise the purpose/applicability section of the nonconformity provisions. The proposed amendment clarifies that structures, uses and lots that were lawful on the date of the adoption of the Code, but not under the new Code, are considered nonconforming. It also further clarifies the intent of the Code to bring nonconforming properties into compliance through a change of use, redevelopment, or other change of condition. Staff is proposing to reduce the amount of time given to a property owner to correct a nuisance violation. The proposed amendment reduces the required compliance time from 10 to 5 days. This would provide the Community Response Team with the means to require rapid resolution of nuisance situations. Examples of nuisances include abandoned buildings, accumulations of weeds, debris, etc.; grass/weeds exceeding 12 inches, and outdoor storage of dismantled or inoperative vehicles, equipment, etc. It should be noted that Community Response Team deals with violations on a case-by-case basis and where circumstances dictate more time for compliance, such flexibility would still exist. In addition, any violation of the Code not deemed a nuisance would be treated through the existing Code enforcement board process. In response to a question, Ms. Dougall-Sides said it is clear in the Code that the compliance time refers to calendar days. Four additional provisions proposed by staff that have surfaced are: 1) Residential Infill Projects; 2) fences; 3) Comprehensive Sign Program; and 4) temporary yard signs. Criteria for residential infill projects provides flexibility to vary development standards permits flexibility in development standards that may be reduced beyond what is listed in use charts. Staff is proposing to more clearly identify this flexibility by adding a footnote to each flexible development use chart in the residential zoning districts specifying that the development standards enumerated for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied depending on each site plan. Staff added a provision in the Code update regarding corner lot fence, however it does not adequately address differing corner lot configurations and needs to be more specific. Staff is proposing that if a corner lot has a rear yard that abuts the rear yard of another corner lot, a six-foot high fence would be permitted in the yard abutting the side street. Consensus of the CDB was not to recommend this amendment to the Commission. Staff also is proposing that if a rear yard of a corner lot abuts a front yard of another lot that only a three-foot high fence be permitted in front of the setback line of the principal building on the adjacent lot. This provision will protect the view of an adjacent property owner. In response to a question, Ms. Clayton said the setback a six- foot high fence would be based on the neighbor's property line, not the street setback. Mr. Stone said this amendment was derived from applications on major corridors where owners with side yards and corner lots want more privacy from the street. Consensus of the COB was not to recommend this amendment to the Commission. Staff has determined there are no regulations that permit political speech in the nonresidential zoning districts. Staff is proposing that the current temporary yard sign be mcd0700 13 07/1 8/00 . . expanded to include a sign not exceeding 32 square feet in the nonresidential zoning districts. Staff added provisions for monument signs in the nonresidential zoning districts in the Code update. It was never contemplated, however, that such signs be subject to the Comprehensive Sign Program which allows an increase of up to 100% in sign size. Staff is proposing that an amendment clarifying this be made to the Comprehensive Sign Program provisions. In response to a question, Mr. Stone said staff anticipates that amendment proposals will be brought before the CDB no more than once a year hereafter. It was remarked that signs for refurbished movie theaters was not addressed in the Code. Mr. Stone said unless an applicant brought the issue forward, that amendment would not be discussed. A procedure in the Code allows applicants to suggest amendments upon payment of an application fee. A representative from PODS (Portable On Demand Storage) requested that staff and the CDB revisit the section of Code referencing portable storage units. She thought the POD would be permitted on the property as long as the permit is active. It appears the PODS will be restricted to only 4 days on location during an active permit. She feels the PODS should be permitted on the site during the entire remodeling process. Mr. Stone said staff feels PODS are intended to be brought to the property as a portable means of storage versus long-term storage units. In response to a question, the PODS representative said PODS can easily be deposited in a side or rear yard, although from a collection standpoint, they are easier to remove if in a driveway. Mr. Stone said the Commission will consider this issue on Thursday. One resident spoke in opposition to PODS on a site for a long period of time and in rear or side yards. In response to a concern from an attorney, Mr. Stone said a section of the Code provides for construction-related storage units not related to PODS. Member Johnson moved that the CDB concurs with staff's recommendations for the amendments presented today, with the exception of the two fence amendments. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Item C8 - 2755 Daniel Street, generally located on the south side of Daniel Street 200 feet west of McMullen Booth Road. Legally described as Lot 4, Block 3, Acker's Subdivision. Barry J. Vogel, Owner/applicant. Marcus Vernon, Representative. Request: Annexation of 0.18 acres into the City. ANX 00-05-10 AND Item C9 - 2755 Daniel Street, generally located on the south side of Daniel Street 200 feet west of McMullen Booth Road. Legally described as Lot 4, Block 3, Acker's mcd0700 14 07/18/00 . . Subdivision. Barry J. Vogel, Owner/applicant. Marcus Vernon, Representative. Request: 1) Land Use plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban Category (County) to R/OG, Residential/Office General Category (Clearwater), and 2) rezoning from R-3District (County) to 0, Office District (Clearwater). LUZ 00-05-07 The owner is requesting to annex property at 2755 Daniel Street. The property has a pending case being processed concurrently that proposes to change the Future Land Use Plan category to Residential/Office General and zoning district to Office. This annexation involves one lot of 8,276 square feet or .19 acres which currently has a single-family residence. An office development has been proposed for the annexed site and adjacent .55 acres presently in the City and is being processed in case FL 00-05-07. The proposed annexation will not adversely affect public services, is consistent with Florida law, the Community Development Code, and City regulations. Staff recommends approval of the annexation of the property at 2755 Daniel Street. (LUZ 00-05-10) The property owner also has submitted a plan amendment and rezoning application to redevelop this lot, designated Residential Urban, in conjunction with adjacent lots designated Residential/Office General. Currently, a single-family house is located on the subject lot (.19 acres) and with surrounding property is proposed to be redeveloped with an office (total site - .74 acres). The site plan is being reviewed concurrently with this application. The proposed Residential/Office General Future Land Use and Office Zoning District does not adversely affect public services, is compatible with the natural environment, and is consistent with the development regulations of the City. Staff recommends approval of: 1) Amending the Future Land Use Plan designation from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential/Office General (R/OG), and 2) amending the zoning district designation of 2755 Daniel Street from County zoning to Office (0). Marcus Vernon, representative, said he had no objection to the CDB hearing both cases concurrently. He thanked staff for their assistance. Member Petersen moved, based on the staff report at this public hearing, that the COB recommend approval to the Commission of the annexation request for property at 2755 Daniel Street. (ANX 00-05-10). The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Member Petersen moved, based on the staff report at this public hearing, that the CDB recommend approval to the Commission of: 1) Amending the Future Land Use Plan designation from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential/Office General (R/OG), and 2) amending the zoning district designation of 2755 Daniel Street from County zoning to Office (0). (LUZ 00-05-07). The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM D - LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS Item D1 - 2750 McMullen Booth Road. Barry J. Vogel, Owner/applicant. Marcus Vernon, Representative. Request: 1) Flexible Development approval 1) to reduce the front setback from 25 to 10 feet (Charles Avenue); 2) reduce the front setback from 25 to 7 feet mcd0700 15 07/18/00 e . (McMullen Booth Road); 3) reduce the front setback from 25 to 24 feet (Daniel Street); 4) reduce the side setbacks from 20 to 5 feet; and 5) reduce the required number of parking spaces from 24 to 22 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: An 8,000 square foot office building. FL 00-05-17 The applicant is proposing to develop an 8,000 square feet office building as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The project includes the demolition of the existing single-family home, reduction of front setback from 25 to 10 feet along Charles Avenue, reduction of front setback from 25 to 7 feet along McMullen Booth Road, reduction of front setback from 25 to 24 feet along Daniel Street, reduction of side setbacks from 20 to 5 feet, and reduction in parking requirement from 24 to 22 spaces. The new office building will have a dark green colored pitched asphalt shingle roof, 15 feet in height as measured to the midpoint of the roof. The building will be pale yellow stucco and buff color brick. The colors are subject to change. Staff believes any changes should be consistent with those on the plan. Windows will be incorporated on all elevations and shutters are included on the north and east (front) elevations. The proposal includes ingress along Charles Avenue to a one-way (northbound) driving aisle and parking lot. The 22 parking spaces are shown at a 75-degree angle. Egress is provided at the north end of the parking lot at Daniel Street. The site plan provides no direct access to McMullen Booth Road. The 0.74-acre site is irregularly shaped with 355 feet of frontage on McMullen Booth Road, 244 feet of frontage on Daniel Street and just over 50 feet of frontage on Charles Avenue. A portion of the site, 0.19 acres, is the subject of pending annexation, land use plan amendment and rezoning cases (ANX 00-05-10 and LUZ 00-05- 07). That portion contains an existing single-family residence. The area facing McMullen Booth Road is undeveloped. The majority of the site has overgrown shrubbery and contains several mature oak trees. McMullen Booth Road is classified as a major arterial and is a designated scenic corridor. Proposed landscaping exceeds Code requirements. The applicant is pursuing a permit with Pinellas County to landscape the right-of-way. Staff recommends approval, subject to conditions: 1) The landscape plan be further revised to include a tiered effect along McMullen Booth Road, as provided through a landscape easement within the right-of-way, and that the agreement with Pinellas County for same be finalized prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2) if the agreement to landscape the right-of-way is not secured, the landscape plan be amended to exceed Code requirements, to the satisfaction of staff; 3) the landscape plan exceeds the intent of the Code including perimeter landscaping along all property lines; 4) the final design and color of the building be consistent with the plans as submitted; and 5) signage comply with Code. Discussion ensued and it was felt that staff's Condition #3 is similar to Condition #2. Marcus Vernon, representative, said a system is in place for a landscaping easement in Pinellas County, but getting it is another story. He said the issue regarding Condition #2 is economic stability. The applicant has agreed to forego the entrance on McMullen Booth Road, forego a parking configuration that allowed for 2 more spaces, and mcd0700 16 07/18/00 . . forego a retention pond in proximity to McMullen Booth Road. The applicant has indicated he will make a concerted effort to obtain a landscape easement. Mr. Vernon said Condition #2 was added after he met with staff. In the event the applicant does not obtain the landscape easement, he feels the applicant should be permitted to proceed with the site plan as submitted. Discussion ensued and Mr. Vernon was agreeable to providing the same amount of landscaping dollar for dollar elsewhere on the site. He said tiering landscaping on an alternate location has not been discussed with staff. Mr. Stone stated that staff can work with Mr. Vernon and the applicant regarding the landscaping issue. Member Johnson moved that the COB approve Case FL 00-05-17 for Flexible Development approval at 2750 McMullen Booth Road, subject to staff conditions, amending Condition #2 to read "if agreement to landscape the right-of-way is not secured, the landscape plan be amended to exceed landscape Code requirements, in an equal monetary equivalent as if the landscaping easement had been obtained. The motion died for lack of a second. Discussion ensued regarding the redundancy of Condition #3. Member Johnson moved that the COB approve Case FL 00-05-17 for Flexible Development approval at 2750 McMullen Booth Road, subject to staff conditions, amending Condition #2 to read "if agreement to landscape the right-of-way is not secured, the landscape plan be amended to exceed landscape Code requirements, to the satisfaction of staff, in an equal monetary equivalent as if the landscaping easement had been obtained", and delete Condition #3. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Item D2 - 850 Eldorado Avenue. Thomas & Kathleen Sherman, Owners/applicants. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 to 12 feet, and increase the maximum impervious surface ratio from 0.65 to 0.75, as part of a Residential Infill Project. Proposed Use: An addition to an existing single-family residence. FL 00-05-15 The applicant is requesting Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 to 12 feet and increase the maximum impervious surface ratio for the site from 0.65 to 0.75, as a Residentiallnfill Project. The site is 0.15 acres located on the northwest corner of Gardenia Street and Eldorado Avenue. The site is located in an area of the beach for which redevelopment requests are common. Eldorado Avenue is a two- lane residential street with a 50-foot right-of-way. Gardenia Street is an unimproved public right-of-way from which public access is provided to the beach. The site contains an existing 3,000 square foot single-family dwelling with an attached, two-car garage, built in 1968. The house is currently setback 10 feet from Eldorado Avenue and is five feet from the north {side} property line. The applicants are proposing to add 89 square feet to an existing master bedroom and 26 square feet to the entryway, totaling 115 square feet. The master bedroom addition will be 12 feet from the front setback on Eldorado Avenue. The required front setback along Eldorado Avenue is 25 feet, which appears extraordinary given the narrow width of the road, however, the request to reduce mcd0700 17 07/18/00 . . the front setback (Eldorado Avenue) from 25 to 12 feet is in keeping with the established character of the area. A majority of the houses in the area have been built at approximately this setback. The proposed addition will not encroach any farther into the front setback than currently exists. The request also includes an increase in the maximum impervious surface ratio (ISR) is from 65 to 75 percent. The existing ratio already exceeds Code requirements by eight- percent (0.73). Staff recommends approval of the request. Chuck Retch/ess, representative, concurred with staff's recommendations. Member Petersen moved that the CDB approve the Flexible Development request to reduce the front setback from 25 to 12 feet along Eldorado Avenue and increase the maximum impervious surface ratio from 0.65 to 0.75, as part of a Residentiallnfill Project, for the site at 850 Eldorado Avenue. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Item D3 - 3219 San Bernadino Street. David & Beth Philion, Owners/Applicants. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the side setback from 15 to 7.5 feet as part of a Residential'nfill Project. Proposed Use: A master bedroom addition to an existing single-family residence. FlOO-05-16 The applicants are requesting Flexible Development approval to reduce the side setback from 15 to 7.5 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project. The site is approximately 0.23 acres located on the south side of San Bernadino Street, approximately 240 feet east of Monterey Avenue. The site contains an existing 1,931 square foot single-family dwelling built in 1958. The dwelling encroaches into the required side setbacks along the east and west property lines. The east side setback is 11.5 feet and the west side setback is 10.5 feet. All other setbacks comply with Code requirements for the Low Density Residential District. The applicants are proposing to construct a 365-square foot master bedroom addition to the rear of the home. The proposal will result in an encroachment into the east side setback. The request is a reduction in the (east) side setback from 15 to 7.5 feet. The proposed addition will be constructed to match the architectural style of the existing house. It will be constructed with an exterior finish and roof materials that will blend into the house. The house is located in the Del Oro Groves neighborhood in eastern Clearwater. Staff recommends approval. David Philion, owner, said he wishes to add a room onto his house. Member Gildersleeve moved that the CDB approve the Flexible Development request to reduce the side setback from 15 to 7.5 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Item D4 - 3273, 3281 landmark Drive. Dr. Douglas Weiland, Owner/applicant. Request: Flexible Development approval to install a six-foot fence within the required 25-foot front setback, as part of a Residential Infill Project. Proposed Use: A 6-foot fence with brick columns along the frontage of two single-family lots. FL 00-05-22 mcd0700 18 07/18/00 . . The applicant is requesting Flexible Development approval to construct a brick and metal fence at a height of 6 feet within the front setback of 3273 and 3281 Landmark Drive and to construct a black vinyl-clad chain link fence along the southern property of 3273 Landmark Drive within the front setback, as part of a Residentiallnfill Project. The site is 2 parcels, held in common ownership, totaling 2.09 acres. The parcels are on the east side of Landmark Drive, approximately 450 feet north of Geiger Court. The site contains 2 single-family dwellings. The site at 3273 Landmark Drive contains a 6-foot aluminum, picket fence with masonry columns along a portion of the front (west) property line. The applicant is proposing to continue the fence, north along the front (west) of property at 3281 Landmark Drive. The aluminum, picket fence also will continue at the southwest corner of the property at 3273 and run east for 20 feet. The proposal also includes the installation of a 6-foot, black vinyl-clad chain link fence to be located along the side (south) property line of the property at 3273 Landmark Drive. The chain link fence will begin 20 feet east of the southwest corner of the site joining the proposed 6- foot aluminum, picket fence and will run east to meet with an existing 6-foot wood fence. The site is in a desirable part of the City that has maintained a significantly high quality of architecture. The request is to reduce the front setback (west) from 25 to zero feet for a 6-foot aluminum, picket fence with masonry columns and a chain link fence. The proposed picket fence will match the architectural style and materials of the existing structures. The proposed chain link fence will begin 20 feet from the front setback and will be clad in black vinyl and heavily landscaped. Staff recommends approval. Roberto Klar, architect, said the applicant wishes to extend his fence to include his entire property. Member Petersen moved that the CDB approve the Flexible Development request to construct a brick and metal fence at a height of 6 feet within the front setback of 3273 and 3281 Landmark Drive, and to construct a black-vinyl clad chain link fence along the southern property of 3273 Landmark Drive within the front setback, as part of a Residential Infill Project at the sites at 3273 and 3281 Landmark Drive. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Item D5 - 800 Eldorado Avenue. Thomas & Pauline Deal. Request; Flexible Development approval 1) to reduce the front setback from 25 to 7 feet on Mango Street; 2) reduce the front setback from 25 to 15 feet on Eldorado Avenue, and 3) increase the height of the dwelling from 30 to 32 feet as part of a Residential Infill Project. Proposed Use: Single- family residence. FL 00-05-20 Member Plisko declared a conflict of interest and excused himself from the discussion and vote. The owners are requesting Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 to 7 feet on Mango Street, reduce the front setback from 25 to 15 feet on Eldorado Avenue, and increase the height of the dwelling from 30 to 32 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project. The site is 0.15 acres on the northwest corner of Eldorado med0700 19 07/18/00 . . Avenue and Mango Streets. Eldorado Avenue is a 2-lane, residential street with a 60~foot right-of-way. Mango Street, although platted as a public street with 60 feet of right-of- way, has been improved with a pedestrian access-only to the beach. It will continue to be used as public access to the Gulf. The site is in a desirable part of the beach that is undergoing redevelopment. The site includes a 1,472 square foot single-family dwelling. The house is set back approximately 9 feet from the front property line on Eldorado Avenue and iapproximately 7 feet from the front property line on Mango Street. As a corner lot, the site has 2 front setbacks. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing house and construct a new 3,600 square foot, single-family dwelling. The required front setback along Eldorado Avenue is 25 feet, which seems extensive given the narrow width of the road. The request to reduce the front setback (east property line) from 25 to 15 feet is in keeping with the established character of the area and would otherwise be a Flexible Standard request requiring a staff-level, administrative review. The proposed dwelling will sit farther from the east property line than currently exists. The request for the second front setback reduction on Mango Street from 25 to 7 feet requires this case be reviewed as a Flexible Development request. The request to reduce the front setback along Mango Street is in keeping with other sites in the area that adjoins public access to the beach. The owner seeks to maintain a consistency in the streetscape of the neighborhood. The applicant also is requesting a height increase from 30 to 32 feet. This will bring the house into visual conformance with the rest of the neighborhood and maximize the potential of the site. The houses will have three stories. A two-bay garage will be located on the lower level with 2 levels of living space above, which is consistent with the neighborhood. Staff recommends approval. Thomas Deal, owner, said he was present to answer questions. Member Petersen moved that the CDB approve the Flexible Development application for a reduction in the front setback from 25 to 7 feet on Mango Street, a reduction of the front setback from 25 to 15 feet on Eldorado Avenue, and an increase in height from 30 to 32 feet as a Residential Infill Project, for the site at 800 Eldorado Avenue. The motion was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken Members Mazur, Gildersleeve, Johnson, Moran, and Petersen voted "aye"; Member Plisko abstained. Motion carried. Item D6 - 2853 Foxwood Drive. Bradley W. Mitchell, Owner/Applicant. Request: Flexible Development approval 1) to reduce the rear setback from 25 to 17 feet, and 2) reduce the side setback from 15 to 7.66 feet, as part of a Residentiallnfill Project. Proposed Use; A 673 square-foot addition to an existing single-family residence. FL 00-04-11 The owners are requesting Flexible Development approval to reduce the rear setback from 25 to 17 feet and reduce the side setback from 15 to 7.66 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project. The site is 0.39 acres on the south side of Foxwood Court, approximately 150 feet west of Landmark Drive. The lot is an irregular rectangle shape that is wider at the street than along the rear property line. The neighborhood has numerous homes that continue to be well maintained. The site contains a 3,697 square foot single-family dwelling built in 1978. The dwelling contains an attached garage and mcd0700 20 07/18/00 . . open porch, as do most of the surrounding homes. The house encroaches on the required 15-foot side setback (east property line) by nearly 4 feet. All other setbacks comply with Code requirements for the Low Density Residential District. The applicants wish to construct a 673-square foot addition to the rear of the home. The addition will encroach into the side and rear setbacks resulting in an 8-foot (east) side setback and a 17-foot rear setback. The proposed addition will not protrude past the existing side walls and will not be seen from Foxwood Court. Existing vegetation and an existing 6- foot wood privacy fence surrounding the back yard will help screen the addition from surrounding properties. Staff recommends approval. Tom Drunasky, representative, was present for questions. Member Petersen moved that the CDB approve the Flexible Development request to reduce the rear setback from 25 to 17 feet and reduce the side setback from 15 to 7.66 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Item 07- 1400 Garden Avenue. Religious Community Services, Owner/Applicant. Request: Flexible Development approval of an expansion of a residential shelter with a request to: 1) reduce the front setback from 25 to 11 feet (Garden Avenue); 2) reduce the side setback from 10 to 4 feet along the south property line (starting at the southwest corner of the site running to the west); 3) reduce the side setback from 10 to 3 feet along the south property line (starting the southwest corner of the site running to the east); and 4) reduce the number of required parking spaces from 26 to 24, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. Proposed Use: A 6,980 square-foot expansion of an existing 7,149 square-foot residential shelter. FL 00-05-18 Member Plisko declared a conflict of interest and excused himself from discussion and the vote. The applicant requests Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 to 11 feet (Garden Avenue), reduce the side setback from 10 to 4 feet along the south property line (from the southwest corner of the site to the west), reduce the side setback from 10 to 3 feet along the south property line (from the southwest corner of the site to the east), reduce the number of required parking spaces from 26 to 24 spaces, and approve an expansion of a residential shelter, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The 0.80-acre site is irregularly shaped with 210 feet of frontage on Garden Avenue and 162 feet of frontage on N. Fort Harrison Avenue. It includes 8 lots (Lots 1, 3, 4, 5, 10, 18, 19, and 20) that have been combined through Unity of Title. The site is the current location of the Haven House that includes 3 existing structures totaling 7,149 square feet. The existing structures include a 4,915 square foot two-story, masonry building (located on Lot 4 at the northwest corner of the site), a 1,202 square foot two- story, masonry building (located on Lot 10 at the northeast corner of the site) and a 1,032 square foot single-story masonry structure (located on Lot 1 at the southwest corner of the site). The Haven House has been located at this site since 1983. It provides shelter to victims of domestic violence and their children and currently operates with 20 beds mcd0700 21 07/18/00 . . with 15 staff members. The proposal includes converting the existing structures to offices, an addition to the smaller 2-story structure, and increasing the number of beds to a total of 34. There will be no increase to the number of staff. The proposal includes the expansion of the existing structure on Lot 10 with a 6,980 square foot addition. The addition will be setback 20.35 feet from the east (front) property line. A new porch will be added to the existing 2-story structure on Lot 1. It will extend 8 feet to the east in line with the existing building. Five new parking spaces will be added to Lot 18 (southeast portion of the site) with a side (south) setback of 4 feet. There are 3 existing access points on the site, 2 from N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (1 each for Lots 1 and 5) and 1 from N. Garden Avenue (Lot 10). A fourth access point will be added for the proposed parking spaces on Lot 18. The proposal incorporates the use of a 6-foot masonry wall (for security purposes) along eastern portion of the site with landscaping on the exterior side. The landscape plan provided exceeds the intent of the Code. Staff recommends approval. Linda Amidi, representative, was present for questions. She commended staff for their assistance. Member Gildersleeve moved that the CDB approve the Flexible Development application to reduce the front setback from 25 to 11 feet (Garden Avenue), reduce the side setback from 10 to 4 feet along the south property line (from the southwest corner of the site to the west), reduce the side setback from 10 to 3 feet along the south property line (from the southwest corner of the site to the east), reduce the number of required parking spaces from 26 to 24 spaces, and approve an expansion of a residential shelter, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, for the site at 1400 North Garden Avenue. The motion was duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken Members Mazur, Gildersleeve, Johnson, Moran, and Petersen voted "aye"; Member Plisko abstained. Motion carried. Item 08- 333 Chestnut Street. Pinellas County/Thomas Borawski, Owner/applicant. Request: Flexible Development approval 1) to reduce the front setback from 25 to 8 feet (Palm Avenue); 2) reduce the front setback from 25 to 9 feet (Oak Avenue); 3) reduction in side yard from 10 to 3 feet; and 4) reduction in required number of parking spaces from 121 to 61 spaces ( 6 spaces on-site and 55 spaces off-site), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: A 22,000 square foot television studio in association with an existing 8,235 square foot facilities maintenance building. Fl 00-05-21 Member Gildersleeve declared a conflict of interest and excused himself from the discussion and vote. The applicant requests Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 to 8 feet (Palm Avenue), reduce the front setback from 25 to 9 feet (Oak Avenue), reduce the side yard from 10 to 3 feet, and reduce the required number of parking spaces from 121 to 61 spaces (6 spaces on-site and 55 spaces off-site), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program. The 1 .06-acre site is at the southeast corner of Chestnut Street and Oak Avenue, west of mcd0700 22 07/18/00 . . Palm Avenue. It is part of a larger Pinellas County government campus just south of downtown Clearwater. The site recently contained a 1,104 square feet 2-story wood building and a 656 square feet single-story building that operated as a production studio. Those structures were razed as part of this redevelopment proposal. It also contains an 8,235 square foot facilities maintenance building that will be maintained as part of this application. There were 52 legal parking spaces on site that served the existing use and the larger government campus; 50 were reassigned to other parking lots and 2 will remain as part of the new site plan. Redevelopment of the site includes the replacement of the former television studio with a new 22,000 square foot building. The building will be 32 feet in height with a flat roof. The building materials will include brown brick and yellow stucco. Although the architectural style is modern, the building will fit the scale of surrounding buildings. The fa<;:ade along Palm Avenue will contain numerous windows. The Chestnut Street elevation features a large circular window. The Oak Avenue elevation depicts a stucco fa<;:ade and large doors for studio use. The use of stucco and brick add interest to the exterior walls. The landscape plan includes a mixture of shade and ornamental trees, shrubs, palms and ground cover. Revisions need to be made to the perimeter landscaping including additional plantings around the detention basin and supplemental periphery trees and shrubs. The proposal includes a reduction in the front setback along Oak Avenue from 25 to 9 feet, a reduction in front setback from 25 to 8 feet along Palm Avenue and a side setback reduction from 10 to 3 feet. The reduction in setbacks will help ensure that the building is in harmony with the immediate vicinity. There are existing 4-foot sidewalks along Oak Avenue and Chestnut Street. A 5-foot sidewalk will be provided along Palm Avenue. The proposal also includes a reduction in the required number of on-site parking spaces from 121 to 6 spaces. The television studio is part of a large County Government campus that has multiple parking lots in the immediate area. The total number of employees will be 30 with up to 20 visitors. The applicant has indicated that 50 spaces will be needed for the proposed building. Code requires that parking be based on the gross floor area, however, the size of the proposed building reflects space needed for equipment rather than people. The applicant's calculation for parking is a better indication of need than current Code requirements. The same rationale is used for the existing facilities management building. Code requires 33 parking spaces based on the building size, yet, the applicant has shown there is a need for only 11 spaces based on the number of employees that work at the facility. The proposed building will displace 50 parking spaces of the 52 spaces that were recently removed on the property. These 50 spaces were reassigned to other lots throughout downtown (28 spaces were assigned to the Methodist Church to the south, 16 spaces were assigned to the First Christian Scientist Church, and 6 spaces were assigned to the City parking lot located on the northeast corner of Ft. Harrison Avenue and Court Street). Based on the applicant's need, 61 parking spaces are required for the new and existing buildings. The plan includes 6 parking spaces to be provided on-site. The remaining 55 parking spaces are to be provided elsewhere within the larger campus. Staff agrees the parking demand for this project is 61 spaces and the applicant has agreed to provide a total of 61 spaces (6 spaces on-site and 55 spaces off-site). Staff recommends approval, subject to conditions: 1) The temporary off-site parking (northeast corner of Turner Street and Ft. Harrison Avenue) be permitted until the provision of adequate alternate or permanent parking is provided to the satisfaction of staff, whichever occurs first; 2) mcd0700 23 07/18/00 " . . should parking arrangements at this lot change and/or be unavailable to the site, the City will be notified immediately to establish a mutually acceptable alternate parking area; 3) a revised master parking plan with all parking assignments be provided to staff, prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for this facility; 4) all parking areas required for this project (on and off-site) be of hard surface material, striped and include required handicap spaces; and 5) the landscape plan be revised to include additional plantings around the detention basin and supplemental periphery trees/shrubs. Concern was expressed that so many contingency plans are being considered. In response to a question, Planner Ryan Givens said the site plan will include handicapped parking spaces. He said staff did not perform an analysis regarding the number of parking spaces the County claims will meet the needs of employees and visitors. Staff is relying on the number of County-leased spaces and their representation sufficient parking spaces are in place. Thomas Borawski, representative, concurred with staff's recommendations. He submitted a map of the downtown and referred to parking lots leased by the County. Some spaces are metered to accommodate the public, and others are not. Some lots are leased for County staff and others are for visitor use. Mr. Borawski said although the building will fill the site and 50 parking spaces have been removed, spaces are available in other nearby lots. Visitors are mostly County staff. The building will be used to film park films and County Commission meetings. Many staff will walk to the building. As volunteers arrive after normal business hours, they will have sufficient parking. In response to a question, Mr. Borawski said the existing parking garage at Osceola Avenue/Court Street will be expanded. He said the City Engineering Department has information regarding parking issues as changes are being made due to the proposed Memorial Causeway Bridge project. Carl Barron, Director of General Services for the County, said the County is in the process of reviewing the proposed plan and road improvements for Chestnut and Court Streets. Parking spaces will be gained in the parking lot west of 315 Court Street, at the Courthouse. Overall parking will increase. He felt comfortable that the County meets parking requirements. Mr. Barron said the City entered into an interlocal agreement with the Board of County Commissioners that states that as the County transfers $10 million to the County's portion out of the Penny for Pinellas to contribute to this project, the City has specific commitments to ensure their design process makes the County whole with regard to parking. Planning Director Ralph Stone said staff feels the 5 recommended staff conditions cover all contingencies. Member Petersen moved that the CDB approve the Flexible Development request to reduce the front setback from 25 to 8 feet (Palm Avenue), reduce the front setback from 25 to 9 feet (Oak Avenue), reduce the side yard from 10 to 3 feet, and reduce the required number of parking spaces from 121 to 61 spaces (6 spaces on-site and 55 spaces off-site), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program at 333 Chestnut Street, subject to conditions: 1) The temporary off-site parking (northeast corner of Turner Street and Ft. Harrison Avenue) be mcd0700 24 07/18/00 .. . . permitted until the provision of adequate alternate or permanent parking is provided to the satisfaction of staff, whichever occurs first; 2) should parking arrangements at this lot change and/or be unavailable to the site, the City will be notified immediately to establish a mutually acceptable alternate parking area; 3) a revised master parking plan with all parking assignments be provided to staff, prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for this facility; 4) all parking areas required for this project (on and off-site) be of hard surface material, striped and include required handicap spaces; and 5) the landscape plan be revised to include additional plantings around the detention basin and supplemental periphery trees/shrubs. The motion was duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken Members Mazur, Plisko, Johnson, Moran, and Petersen voted "aye"; Member Gildersleeve abstained. Motion carried. ITEM E - APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVOIUS MEETING: June 20, 2000 Member Moran moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of June 20, 2000, as submitted in written summation to each Board member. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM F - DIRECTOR'S ITEMS - None. Other Business It was requested staff recommend to the Commission that consideration be given to replacement/updating of the microphones in Chambers. It was requested staff ensure that all surveys submitted with cases be current. The Assistant City Attorney said an administrative hearing was held on June 29, 2000, regarding the cellular telecommunication tower issue. She said parties are submitting proposed order and a ruling should be given within 45 days of the hearing. A companion federal case is in mediation. Staff was complimented for working with applicants to resolve issues. ITEM G - ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6: 16 p.m. Chair Community Development Board Attest: mcd0700 25 07!1 8/00 .. . . CITY OF CLEARWATER ------- PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 July 24,2000 Mr. James A. Vogel 1721 Rainbow Drive Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: Development Order regarding case FL 00-05-17 at 2750 McMullen Booth Road Dear Mr. Vogel: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.7 of the Community Development Code. On July 18, 2000, the Community Development Board reviewed your application to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 10 feet along Charles Avenue, reduce the front setback from 25 feet to seven feet along McMullen Booth Road, reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 24 feet along Daniel Street, reduce the side setbacks from 20 feet to five feet, and reduce the parking requirement from 24 spaces to 22 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and Comprehensive Landscape Program. Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Board found that the proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval, the maximum development potential standards, and all other applicable standards of the Community Development Code. The Community Development Board granted approval of the application with the following conditions: 1) That the landscape plan be further revised to include a tiered effect along McMullen Booth Road, as provided through a landscape easement within the right-of-way, and that the agreement with Pinellas County for same be finalized prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2) That if the agreement to landscape the right-of-way is not secured, the landscape plan be amended to exceed Code requirements in an equal monetary equivalent as if the landscaping easement had been obtained; 3) That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the plans as submitted; and 4) That signage comply with Code. ONE CITY. ONE FUTURE. BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ].B.]OHNSON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HART, COMMISSIONER * BOB ClARK, COMMISSIONER ED HOOPER, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . Vogel July 24,2000 - Page 2 . . Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval and all required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the date of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. Please remember that a building permit and impact fees will be required prior to the construction of the project. Should you have any questions, please call Ryan Givens, Planner at 562-4504. Very truly yours, n~/h~ Gerald Figurski, Chairman Community Development Board Cc: Marcus Vernon S:\Planning DepartmentlC D B\FLEX\Pending ApplicationslMcMullen 2750 VogellMcMullen 2750 Development order. doc . . CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, July 18, 2000, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola A venue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: 1. (cont from 6/20/00) Harold S. Wilson, TRE / Irene E. Datlow / Parsley Baldwin Realty are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the required number of parking spaces from 135 spaces to 40 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project at 18524 U.S. 19 N., Sec 19-29-16, M&B's 44.04 & 44.05. CDB 00-14 / FL 00-03-09 2. Barry J. V02el & James A. V02el, TRE is requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (Charles Avenue), reduce the front setback from 25 ft to 7 ft along McMullen Booth Road, reduce the side setbacks from 20 ft to 5 ft, and reduce the required number of parking spaces from 24 [~~~~2 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program at ......... 2750l'liMullen Booth Rd., Acker's Sub, Lots 4-10. CDB 00-19 / FL 00-05-17 3. Thomas C & Kathleen M Sherman are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 ft to 12 ft and increase the maximum impervious surface ratio from 0.65 to 0.75, as part of a Residential Infill Project at 850 Eldorado Ave., Mandalay Sub, Blk 7, Lot 1 and riparian rights. CDB 00-20 / FL 00-05-15 4. David P & Beth A Philion are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the side setback from 15 ft to 7.5 ft, as part of a Residential Infill Project at 3219 San Bernadino St., Del Oro Groves, Lots 449, 450, and part of Lot 451. CDB 00-21 / FL 00-05-16 5. Dou2las J. Weiland & Elizabeth C. Sirna are requesting a flexible development approval to install a 6 ft fence within the required 25 ft front setback, as part of a Residential Infill Project at 3267, 3273 & 3281 Landmark Dr., Geiger Tract, Lots 2-4 and Michael Tract, Lot 1. CDB 00-22 / FL 00-05-22 6. Thomas E. & Pauline Deal are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 ft to 7 ft on Mango Street, reduce the front setback from 25 ft to 15 ft on Eldorado Avenue, and increase the height of the dwelling from 30 ft to 32 ft, as part of a Residential Inf1l1 Project at 800 Eldorado Ave., Mandalay Sub, Blk 5, Lot 1 and riparian rights. CDB 00-23 / FL 00-05-20 7. Bradley W & Mar2eanne Mitchell is requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the rear setback from 25 ft to 17 and reduce the side setback from 15 ft to 7.66 ft, as part of a Residential Infill Project at 2853 Foxwood Dr., Landmark Woods 2nd Addition, Lot 41. CDB 00-24 / FL 00-04-11 8. Reli2ious Community Services, Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval of an expansion of a residential shelter with a request to: reduce the front setback from 25 ft to 11 ft (Garden Ave.), reduce the side setback from 10 ft to 4 ft along the south property line (starting at the southwest comer of the site running to the west), reduce the side setback from 10 ft to 3 ft along the south property line (starting at the southwest comer of the site running to the east), reduce the number of required parking spaces from 26 to 24, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project at 1400 Garden Ave., Enghurst Addition to Clearwater, Lots I, 18, 19, & 20 and Twin Oaks Sub, Lots 4,5, 10, and part of Lot 3. CDB 00-25 / FL 00-05-18 9. Pinellas County is requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 ft to 8 ft (Palm Ave.), reduce the front setback from 25 ft to 9 ft (Oak Ave.), reduction in side yard from 10 ft to 3 ft, and reduction in required number of parking spaces from 120 spaces to 6 spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program at 333 Chestnut St., Matlack Place, Lot 1-8. CDB 00-26 / FL 00-05-21 . . Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning and Development Services Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning and Development Services Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call 562-4567. Lisa Fierce Planning and Development Services Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/ AAE City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COpy OF TillS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN TillS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090. Ad: 07/01/00 . LLI"I"""""""" O . . .......... ;:::::. .;:;:;:;:;:;:: :::::., ":::::' ... ....... . . . ... ........ . .. . . .... ....... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ......... ... ........ .I....B..... rwater >- \{'. ")?\ '. ::"",{' . .... ....... .. ..... ... . . . ..... ... . ..... .. I- ..::::::::::::.....:...:.. ...~.:::::::.:.::::::_ FAX u TO: D. Walker Planning and Development Services Administration 100 S. Myrtle Avenue P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, F10rida 33758-4748 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 FAX: 726-4767 FROM: Ryan Givens TELEPHONE: TELEPHONE: 726-4766 727-562-4504 SUBJECT: Vogel Property - FL 00-05-17 DATE: June 30, 2000 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 4 The followina is a copy that was sent to Mr. Marcus Vernon: Your Flexible Development application is scheduled for review by the Community Development Board (COB) at its July 18, 2000 meeting. The site plan has greatly improved since the original submittal with the revised circulation and access modifications. The building elevations have also been significantly enhanced. Additional changes are needed to the landscape plan to show compliance with the requirements of the Comprehensive Redevelopment Infill Project criteria. The landscape plan submitted does not meet Code requirements. The following issues should be addressed: · Continuous landscaping needs to be present along Charles Avenue. · A better landscape pattern needs to be created in the Right-of-way. The Indian Hawthorne in the right of way is placed rather random and does not follow any particular pattern. · The corner of Daniel and McMullen Booth can be sod and Jasmine. The Sweet Viburnum on the plan submitted to staff will block the sign as it starts to mature. · Reduce the number of Live Oaks along McMullen Booth. The trees along McMullen Booth on the plan submitted to staff are placed rather randomly. · Place plant material along the side of the building facing Daniel Street. · Use Jasmine and Indian Hawthorn in the planter islands. The plan submitted to staff contains only a few Indian Hawthorn shrubs randomly planted. Staff has prepared a landscape plan, as attached, for your reference. Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss this matter. A revised landscape plan needs to be submitted by Thursday, July 6, 2000 to be included in the COB packet. Additionally, the site plan indicates the proposed building colors may be altered with the building permit. This note needs to be removed because the color selection needs to be determined with the application for review by the Board. Any change of color after the COB approval will need to be in keeping with the approved colors. Minor color changes may be made with staff approval. . LLI:::I"::::::::::" 0::,::. ...::::::::,:, ,:,::., "::,::' .... ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ....... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ......... ... ........ ............... .I.....B..... rwater .... ....... ....... >-=:::}:. ::::,,:,:"-,:, '. ':::::::::-'.: . . . . . . .. ... . . ..... ..0. . . ..... ... . ..... .. I- ":::::::::::;.;...:..,:. "'~':::::::':'::::::' FAX o Planning and Development Services Administration 100 S. Myrtle Avenue P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, F10rida 33758-4748 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 TO: Marcus Vernon FAX: TELEPHONE: TELEPHONE: 446-6213 447-4444 FROM: Ryan Givens 727-562-4504 SUBJECT: Vogel Property - FL 00-05-17 DATE: June 30, 2000 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 4 Your Flexible Development application is scheduled for review by the Community Development Board (COB) at its July 18, 2000 meeting. The site plan has greatly improved since the original submittal with the revised circulation and access modifications. The building elevations have also been significantly enhanced. Additional changes are needed to the landscape plan to show compliance with the requirements of the Comprehensive Redevelopment Infill Project criteria. The landscape plan submitted does not meet Code requirements. The following issues should be addressed: · Continuous landscaping needs to be present along Charles Avenue. · A better landscape pattern needs to be created in the Right-of-way. The Indian Hawthorne in the right of way is placed rather random and does not follow any particular pattern. · The corner of Daniel and McMullen Booth can be sod and Jasmine. The Sweet Viburnum on the plan submitted to staff will block the sign as it starts to mature. · Reduce the number of Live Oaks along McMullen Booth. The trees along McMullen Booth on the plan submitted to staff are placed rather randomly. · Place plant material along the side of the building facing Daniel Street. · Use Jasmine and Indian Hawthorn in the planter islands. The plan submitted to staff contains only a few Indian Hawthorn shrubs randomly planted. Staff has prepared a landscape plan, as attached, for your reference. Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss this matter. A revised landscape plan needs to be submitted by Thursday, July 6, 2000 to be included in the COB packet. Additionally, the site plan indicates the proposed building colors may be altered with the building permit. This note needs to be removed because the color selection needs to be determined with the application for review by the Board. Any change of color after the COB approval will need to be in keeping with the approved colors. Minor color changes may be made with staff approval. . LLI""I"" """""'. 0",.. ...,.,::.,::, ::::::.....::::::: ... ......... . .... ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ....... . .. ... ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. ........ ............... .1....1...... rwater .... ....... ....... >-=:::=::::. :::::}--:;: :. :::::::::'.: .... ....... .. ..... ... . . . ..... ... . ...... .. I- '.:::::::~::::.....:..,:.. "~':::::::':'::::::' FAX u Planning and Development Services Administration 100 S. Myrtle Avenue P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Telephone (J27) 562-4567 Fax (J27) 562-4576 TO: Marcus Vernon FAX: TELEPHONE: TELEPHONE: 706-343-1011 706-474-2826 FROM: Ryan Givens 727-562-4504 SUBJECT: Vogel Property - FL 00-05-17 NUMBER OF PAGES 4 INCLUDING COVER: DATE: June 30, 2000 Your Flexible Development application is scheduled for review by the Community Development Board (COB) at its July 18, 2000 meeting. The site plan has greatly improved since the original submittal with the revised circulation and access modifications. The building elevations have also been significantly enhanced. Additional changes are needed to the landscape plan to show compliance with the requirements of the Comprehensive Redevelopment Infill Project criteria. The landscape plan submitted does not meet Code requirements. The following issues should be addressed: · Continuous landscaping needs to be present along Charles A venue. · A better landscape pattern needs to be created in the Right-of-way. The Indian Hawthorne in the right of way is placed rather random and does not follow any particular pattern. · The corner of Daniel and McMullen Booth can be sod and Jasmine. The Sweet Viburnum on the plan submitted to staff will block the sign as it starts to mature. · Reduce the number of Live Oaks along McMullen Booth. The trees along McMullen Booth on the plan submitted to staff are placed rather randomly. · Place plant material along the side of the building facing Daniel Street. · Use Jasmine and Indian Hawthorn in the planter islands. The plan submitted to staff contains only a few Indian Hawthorn shrubs randomly planted. Staff has prepared a landscape plan, as attached, for your reference. Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss this matter. A revised landscape plan needs to be submitted by Thursday, July 6, 2000 to be included in the COB packet. Additionally, the site plan indicates the proposed building colors may be altered with the building permit. This note needs to be removed because the color selection needs to be determined with the application for review by the Board. Any change of color after the COB approval will need to be in keeping with the approved colors. Minor color changes may be made with staff approval. /t C C(JL/ tV/t5 IS ;::c,z 52:/lr 01e) ya( (7[?12t'7/f4' /tI(/lJ1tJ~~ . /fIlS yti(/f- i:&[c/Z/J )' -.!) ~ ~\ ~~ x.\~ I.U- tJ ~- .bJ~' r:..\-~ ~ bl tV ~.)..... .^ '.)~lP I . . ~~ ~~ ,.)..... ;:, .~ .r- " !:::;:r ;;'N .h .....; ~ "j III :::r ~ ,.- ----IN ~ ~ i." Q.,i .:.~lf~ ~ A 1-1~ '>- ~~.~:l C> .~ -<' ~"'" I . '0 ~ "" ~ ~ u ~() ~I.I <;:)-.j ~~~ ~,j::l ~,~ \:) ~ ll.I " _..... ,1\.1 ::.- <( .. ~ 1.)..... ~ ~ ..:. N ~ "" \-= ~'" ' ,,' ~ '.: ~ m ." ~:;. ~ :.," ~~ ~~~ ~ N ~ ~ I \ I\l ":::i - ~II_II~ z: ~ v ~ ~ ~~ :r ." <t " - \Il -"f:i. - ~ . >- ~ \~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ &. '1~ :I . . CDB Meeting Date: July 18.2000 Case Number: FL 00-05-18 Agenda Item: D 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNER: Barry J. Vogel REPRESENTATIVE: J. Marcus Vernon, Esquire LOCATION: 2750 McMullen Booth Road REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 10 feet along Charles Avenue, reduce the front setback from 25 feet to seven feet along McMullen Booth Road, reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 24 feet along Daniel Street, reduce the side setbacks from 20 feet to five feet, and reduce the parking requirement from 24 spaces to 22 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevel- opment Project and Comprehensive Landscape Program and; PLANS REVIEWED: Site plan prepared by Walker & Associates Architects P.A. SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.742 acres DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 355 feet by 244 feet PROPERTY USE: Current use: Proposed use: Single-family residential. Office PLAN CATEGORY: RlOG, Residential/ Office General Category (pending LUZ 00-05-07) ZONING DISTRICT: 0, Office District Page 1 . . ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Convenience Store South: Vacant East: Residential West: Residential CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity IS characterized with retail and residential uses. ANALYSIS: The 0.74-acre site is irregularly shaped with 355 feet of frontage on McMullen Booth Road, 244 feet of frontage on Daniel Street and just over 50 feet of frontage on Charles Avenue. A portion of the site, 0.19 acres, is the subject of pending annexation, land use plan amendment and rezoning cases (ANX 00-05-10 and LUZ 00-05-07). That portion contains an existing single-family residence. The area facing McMullen Booth Road is undeveloped. The majority of the site has overgrown shrubbery and contains several mature oak trees. McMullen Booth Road is classified as a major arterial and is a designated scenic corridor. The applicant is proposing to develop an 8,000 square feet office building as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The proposal included the demolition of the existing single-family. The building will have a pitched asphalt shingle roof with stucco exterior. Windows will be incorporated on all elevations. The building will be 15 feet in height. The proposal includes ingress along Charles Avenue to a one-way (northbound) driving aisle and parking lot. The 22 parking spaces are shown at a 75-degree angle. Egress is provided at the north end of the parking lot at Daniel Street. The landscape plan as proposed exceeds the intent of the Code. It includes the required perimeter buffering and trees, plus additional landscaping with in the McMullen Booth right of way. Additional Live Oak trees are provided along the frontage of McMullen Booth Road. The applicant is pursuing a permit with Pinellas County to landscape the right-of-way. A tiered effect landscape treatment will be provided within the landscape easement. The applicant has not yet submitted an application for signage. Page 2 . . A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN THE 0, OFFICE DISTRICT: STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? FLOOR AREA 0.50 0.048 0.247 Yes RATIO IMPERVIOUS 0.75 0.076 0.51 Yes SURFACE RATIO B. FLEXffiILITY STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE 0, OFFICE DISTRICT: STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? LOT AREA 20,000 square 32,322 square 32,322 square Yes minimum feet feet feet LOT WIDTH 50 feet 355 feet 355 feet Yes minimum HEIGHT 25 - 50 feet 12 feet 16 feet Yes maximum FRONT YARD o - 25 feet 18 feet - Daniel 7 feet - Yes SETBACK Street McMullen minimum Booth; 10 feet - Charles Avenue; 24 feet - Daniel SIDE YARD 0- 10 feet 7 feet - existing Stfult Yes SETBACK building minimum PARKING 0-15 2 spaces 22 spaces Yes SPACES spaces/1,OOO minimum square feet of GFA Page 3 . . C. FLEXffiILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The site's odd shape and size makes development under the current Code requirement very difficult. The McMullen Booth Road frontage was condemned for right of way use and reduced the depth of the lot. The site requires deviations from current Code requirements to enable reasonable development. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; The abutting properties consist of commercial and residential uses. The proposed office will serve as an appropriate transition between McMullen Booth Road to the east and the residential uses to the west. The proposed office building will include high quality design and will be aesthetically pleasing. The improvements to the property may positively influence other enhancements in the area. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; The proposed office building is permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses; The proposed one-story office building is compatible with adjacent land uses. Additional landscaping will buffer surrounding residential uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The applicant desires a site with frontage onto a major arterial with access from secondary streets. Due to the widening of McMullen Booth Road, the requested reductions would be required for the development of the site. Page 4 . . 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; Development of the site in a well-designed manner will create an enhanced street appearance. The proposal includes high-quality architecture and extensive landscaping which exceeds the requirements of the Code. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; The proposed office development will increase the standard of architecture and landscaping in the area and may serve as a catalyst for future redevelopment. The office use is a good transition from McMullen Booth Road to the residential uses to the west. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; Staff has concluded that flexibility in setbacks and off-street parking is needed in order to facilitate redevelopment along McMullen Booth Road. While the area is need of an improved streetscape, irregular-shaped lots make it difficult to foster desired redevelopment. The lot was dramatically reduced in size through County condemnation of McMullen Booth Road. The applicant pursuing an agreement with Pinellas County to landscape the right-of-way that would otherwise be bare and poorly maintained. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. This proposed office building will not contain multiple uses, and thus, is not required under Code to enter into a shared parking agreement. The site will contain only two spaces less than Code requires. Page 5 . . D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed development includes a one-story building with extensive buffering. The atheistic character of the area will ultimately improve through high quality architecture and landscaping. The area to the northwest of the site is predominately office uses. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The site may promote and encourage future development and reinvestment along the McMullen Booth corridor. The proposed development will not negatively impact prospects of development in this area. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposal will have a minimal effect on traffic. The site plan includes the removal of an existing curb cut on McMullen Booth Road. The side is accessed via Charles Avenue. There is an exit-only on Daniel Street. McMullen Booth Road does not have a median cut which forces traffic to travel south. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposal includes a one-story office building, which is consistent with the community character. 6. The design of the proposed development mlmmlZes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Page 6 . . There will be no adverse effects generated by the proposed development. The applicant has worked with staff to create a quality site plan that will be a positive addition to the area. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on June 7, 2000. The applicant has worked with staff to provide an attractive, well-designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The proposal is in compliance with the provisions of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and the resulting site plan will contain several attractive elements such as high-quality architecture and landscaping. Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application for the site at 2750 McMullen Booth Road, to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (Charles Avenue), reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 7 feet along McMullen Booth Road, reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 24 feet along Daniel Street, and reduce the side setbacks from 20 feet to 5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and Comprehensive Landscape Program and; to reduce the parking requirement from 24 parking spaces to 22 parking spaces and; payment of a fee in lieu of the construction for a sidewalk along Daniel Street subject to the following conditions: 1) That a revised landscape plan that meets or exceeds the requirements of Code be submitted, subject to staff approval, prior to the issuance of any permits; and 2) That the site plan reflect an increased landscaped buffer along McMullen Booth Road by entering into an agreement with Pinellas County to landscape the right-of- way; and 3) That the office building have windows or architectural interest on all sides; and 4) That payment be provided in lieu for the construction of sidewalks along Daniel Street. Prepared by: W. Ryan Givens, Planner: ATT ACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application Page 7 . . S:\P/anning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXIPending ApplicationslMcMullen 2750 Voge/lMcMullen 2750 STAFF REPORT. doc Page 8 LL ...............,...... . 0::1/::;;:;::\ :.::::::::::."'" rwater :..:. i:.:..::::::.:':: ?';;,:;..::,:.,:: : :::::.:::;::!;./.)..,::'::::;:;" . Updated as of 6/1600 u ACTION AGENDA * SPECIAL MEETING * DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE June 7, 2000 1. Case: ANX 00-05-10 - 2755 Daniel Street Owner/Applicant: Barry 1. Vogel. Location: 0.19 acres located on the south side of Daniel Street, approximately 200 feet west of McMullen Booth Road. Request: Annexation of 0.18 acres into the City of Clearwater. Presenter: Gary L. Jones, Senior Planner. ACTION: The DRC recommended approval of this application. It will be forwarded to the CDB at its July 18, 2000 meeting. 2. Case: LUZ 00-05-07 - 2755 Daniel Street Owner/Applicant: Barry 1. Vogel. Location: 0.19 acres located on the south side of Daniel Street, approximately 200 feet west of McMullen Booth Road. (a) Land Use Plan Amendment from Residential Urban Category (County) to Residential/Office General Category (City); and (b) Rezoning from R-3 District (County) to 0, Office District (Clearwater). Presenter: Gary L. Jones, Senior Planner. ACTION: The DRC recommended approval of this application. It will be forwarded to the CDB at its July 18,2000 meeting. 3. Case: FL 00-05-17 - 2750 McMullen Booth Road Owner/Applicant: Barry 1. Vogel Location: 0.742 acres located on the south side of Daniel Street, west of McMullen Booth Road, and north of Charles Avenue. Zoning: 0, Office District (partial undergoing annexation and rezoning). Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 14 feet (Charles Avenue), reduce the front setback from 25 feet to five feet along McMullen Booth Road, and reduce the side setbacks from 20 feet to 10 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: An 8,000 square foot office building. Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner. ACTION: The DRC reviewed this application. Issues raised that need to be addressed by June 13, 2000 in order to forward it to the CDB (July 18, 2000 meeting) include: DRC action agenda - 6.7.00 - page 2 . . 1. The landscape plan needs to be amended to exceed code including provision of plant grades, sizes, and heights; 2. Resolve the access issue along McMullen Booth Road; 3. Provide four-sided architecture/elevations and improve upon the submittal (add pitched roof); 4. Modify the tree survey (add diameter); 5. Meet the requirements of Solid Waste Department (no backing out of trucks); 6. Provide preliminary drainage calculations and relocate pond away from McMullen Booth Road frontage, if possible; 7. Provide signed and sealed site plan including all easements; 8. Provide sidewalk along Daniel Street or pay fee in lieu, if meet required criteria; 9. Clearly depict use on site plans (medical, non-medical, etc.); 10. Provide geometrics on adjacent roadways; 11. Address tree deficit (16 inches); 4. Case: ANX 00-05-09 - 110 McMullen Booth Road Owner/Applicant: First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc. Representative: Larry Ponder, Administrator. Location: 11.81 acres located on the southwest comer of Drew Street and McMullen Booth Road. Request: Annexation of 11. 81 acres into the City of Clearwater. Presenter: Gary L. Jones, Senior Planner. ACTION: The DRC recommended approval of this application. It will be forwarded to the CDB at its July 18,2000 meeting. 5. LUZ 00-05-05 - 110 McMullen Booth Road Owner/Applicant: First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc. Representative: Larry Ponder, Administrator. Location: 11.81 acres located on the southwest comer of Drew Street and McMullen Booth Road. Request: (a) Land Use Plan Amendment from RU, Residential Urban Category to I, Institutional Category; and (b) Rezoning from AE, Agriculture/Estate District (County) to I, Institutional District (Clearwater). Presenter: Gary L. Jones, Senior Planner. ACTION: The DRC recommended approval of this application. It will be forwarded to the CDB at its July 18, 2000 meeting. 6. Case: ANX 00-05-08 - 1765 St. Croix Drive Owner/Applicant: Jeanette Elaine Harvey-Evans. Location: 0.17 acres located on the east side of St. Croix Drive, approximately 600 feet north of St. John Drive. Request: (a) Annexation of 0.17 acres to the City of Clearwater; (b) Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban Classification (County) to RU, Residential Urban Classification (Clearwater); and (c) Rezoning from R-3, Residential, Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater). Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner. ACTION: The DRC recommended approval of this application. It will be forwarded to the CDB at its July 18, 2000 meeting. . . CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 June 19,2000 1. Marcus Vernon, Esq. 1721 Rainbow Drive Clearwater, Florida 33755 FIL' RE: Community Development Board Meeting Dear Mr. Vernon: The application that you submitted for property located at 2750 McMullen Booth Road has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on July 18, 2000. The meeting will take place at 1 :OOpm, in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 562-4504. Sincerely yours, S:\Planning DepartmentlC D B\FLEX\Pending ApplicationslMcMullen 2750 VogellMcMullen 2750 CDB letter. doc QXE en!. QXE FnCRE. BRL^"'\ J. AU-;GST. lIL\YOR-CmlMISSIOl\ER JB. Jom;soc:, VICE :ViAYOR-Cm!\lISSIO"ER BOB CL~RK, CmIMISSIO"ER ED HART. Cme,lISSIOKER ED HOOPER, CO\l\HSSIO:-':ER "EQUAL EMPLOY.lIE:':T A,XD AFFIR\LATIVE Acnox E\IPLOYER" . CITY OF . CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUiLDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 June 19,2000 fJ.LI Barry J. Vogel 1721 Rainbow Drive Clearwater, Florida 33755 ... RE: Community Development Board Meeting Dear Mr. Vogel: The application that you submitted for property located at 2750 McMullen Booth Road has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on July 18, 2000. The meeting will take place at 1 :OOpm, in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 562-4504. Sincerely yours, ~~u< an Givens lanner S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BlFLEXlPending ApplicationslMcMullen 2750 VogellMcMullen 2750 CDB letter. doc O:\"E CITY. O:\"E FCn:RE. BRI.'u\ J. Al"i\GST, MWOR-CQ;\l~IlSSIOI\ER J.B. JOHi\SOi\, VICE M.WOR-CO~l~\!SSIO;\ER BOB CLARK, CO.\IMISSIOi\ER ED HART, COM'vIlSSIOi\ER ED HOOPER, CO~lMISSIONER "EQUAL E'vlPLOYME:\"T A.'\D AFFIRMATIVE ACTIO:\" EMPLOYER" . . CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 May 31,2000 1. Marcus Vernon, Esq. 1721 Rainbow Drive Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: Application for Flexible Development as a Comprehensive Infill Application Dear Mr. Vernon: The Planning staff has reviewed your application to allow an office building to be located at 2750 McMullen Booth Road and determined that the application is complete. The application has been entered into the Department's filing system. The application will be reviewed for sufficiency by the Development Review Committee on June 8, 2000 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the municipal service building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue in Clearwater. Please call Amy Ruscher, Staff Assistant, at 562-4579 no earlier than one-week prior to the meeting date for your review time. You or your client need to be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 562-4504. S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXIPending ApplicationslDaniel 2755 VogelIDaniel2755 complete. doc O:\E CIn". O:\E FnLJRE. BRLA.,'.; J. AUKGST, :\lAYOR-CmIMISSIO!\ER J.B. JOHNSON, VICE MWOR-Cme\IISSIO!\ER ED HART, COMMISSIO!\ER (it BOB CLARK, Cml\llSSI01\ER ED HOOPER, CmlMISSI01\ER "EQUAL EMPLOY'vlE:\T A:\D AFFIRJvlATIVE ACTIO:\ EMPLOYER" . . CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 May 31,2000 Barry 1. Vogel 1721 Rainbow Drive Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: Application for Flexible Development as a Comprehensive Infill Application Dear Mr. Vogel: The Planning staff has reviewed your application to allow an office building to be located at 2750 McMullen Booth Road and determined that the application is complete. The application has been entered into the Department's filing system. The application will be reviewed for sufficiency by the Development Review Committee on June 8, 2000 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the municipal service building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue in Clearwater. Please call Amy Ruscher, Staff Assistant, at 562-4579 no earlier than one-week prior to the meeting date for your review time. You or your agent need to be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 562-4504. ~smc:y:ur~, n Givens lanner S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending ApplicationsIDaniel2755 VogelIDaniel2755 complete2.doc O:\E Cln'. O:\E FUTURE. BRLAJ\ J. AUI\GST. ivlwOR-CmlMISSIOI\ER J.B. JOH!\SON, VICE 1\1AYOR-CO;\l;\lISSI01\ER ED HART, COMMISSI01\ER * BOB ClARK, CO;\lMISSIO!\ER ED HOOPER, COW,lISSI01\ER "EQUAl EMPLOYME:\T A:\D AFFIRMA.TNE ACTIO:\ EMPLOYER" It I LL 1'1... '//,.. O. . .......... . . . . . . . . . . . ;:::::. ......:::::: :::::.', ":::::' n. ....... . . . n. ........ . .. . . .... ....... ... . n. ........ . . .... ....... . ... ......... ... ........ ............... .1....1..... rwater >- ){'. ))'/' '. '{{:'...' .... ....... .. ..... n. . . . ..... .. . "' ...... .. f--- '::::::::::::';':':"':"":-:::::::-:-:::=:=' o Planning and Development Services Administration SUBJECT: FL 00-05-18 DATE: July 18, 2000 I. Site Description A. Location 1. 1 block south of 580 2. McMullen Booth Road B. Existing residential dwelling 1 . to be removed C. Irregular shape 1. Frontage was condemned for right-of-way 2. Need deviations from setbacks. II. Proposed Building A. 8,000 s.t. office building B. Pitched Roof C. 15 feet high D. Yellow Stucco and buff color brick E. Windows on all elevations III. Landscaping A. Perimeter landscaping B. Permit with Pinellas County 1. Landscape a portion of the Right-of-way 2. Tiered effect C. Minor revisions are needed IV. Ingress/Egress A. Ingress - Charles Avenue B. Egress - Daniel Street C. One way D. Eliminated curb-cut on to McMullen Booth Road V. Improved Site Plan A. Worked with staff B. Better architecture C. Better landscaping D. Better site design .. ~ . VI. Approval wI conditions A. That the landscape plan be further revised to include a tiered effect along McMullen Booth Road, as provided through a landscape easement within the right-of-way, and that the agreement with Pinellas County for same be finalized prior to the issuance of a building permit; B. That if the agreement to landscape the right-of-way is not secured, the landscape plan be amended to exceed Code requirements, to the satisfaction of staff; C. That the landscape plan exceeds the intent of the Code including perimeter landscaping along all property lines; D. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the plans as submitted; and E. That signage comply with Code. ,. LL 1-"'1... ,-",-"".. 0,.,.. ",.} ,:,}'.'.",{" ... ...... . ... ....... ... " .... . .. . .... . .... . ". ... " ..... . . .... ..... . ... ......... ... ....... ............... .1. .....ft..... rwater >-)). ,{,}} '. ":')(..' .... ....... .. ..... ... . . . ..... .. . .. ...... .. I- '<<:;;:;:;:;.;.,.:..-:. "':'::;::::':';:;:::' - o Planning and Development Services Administration SUBJECT: FL 00-05-17 DATE: July 17, 2000 Presentation Materials I CITY O}4' \,;L' UW'Al~K . AFFIDAVIT TO AUl':':I<II!ZE AGENT o PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMlNISTRA nON MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUIH MYRTLE A VENUE. 2'" FLOOR PHONE (727)-5624567 FAX (727) 562-4576 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS J~HE-,;) 8-. VbGGL (Name off IN propenv owners) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: ADDR~::- GENERALLOCATION: )ij)J \ ~ L S- r "Y Me. H uLLr=. tJ 8e.{,THo Pi> LbTS ./;-;1-,'7. S", ~, 10 A'-I<6.I~15 SUl3U', VI5il:>tJA~ PEO.>R\\J;"'i) :,oe i~ . D . :> CE. q I Q t L(~ LIS C!:)otJ 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (NatIR or request) 3, That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint - - '3" k ~'t- f\l Q. U 5" ' E IV D ~' E S' ~ W lIS (hisl'lheir) agenl(") to execute any petitione. or other documents IlIC4ItISlIry to effect such -. I 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of on the above described property; SIGNED (Property Owner) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT e foregeff\9Jf~~~T~~rrect. 0" STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF. PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before me this (ti. Lf ~ day of M tq i . A.D., _ JJ.;Ol) to me and/or by 31tHE.S 1+. \)6b~L . \Yho is personally , ------- .-- known _~8S produced /-..) i t-:j. as identification. SIGNED (Property Owner) ~/j 0 .. /~ ~~ j/tr- Notaty public. My commission expires: l~~\~~ LOUISE HOVE :.: ":.: MY COMMISSION' CC 834276 ~ . "~ff EXPIRES: Aprl114, 2001 _ ~"t~~~~ .BO~~ ~~ ~~~~~: ~n~~ers J SIGNED (Property OWner) 9/9 a6ed ~W~V€:6 Oo-€~-^ew ~~~O~€v€90L , .30I~~O M~l NON~3^ :A8 lues 9 aBed !3~I~~O MV' NONH3^ <- ~~O~~v~90L !~VRv:R on/~~/q :p9ftTanAH .LICATION FOR SITE oI8'J APPRUV AL t'LA~'NING & DEVELOPMENT SER ~~ ADMINISTRA TION MUNICIPAL SF.~VICES BUilDING. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VENUE. 2nd FLOOR ~L. PHONE (727).562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 ~~ I 1\ This form rnu!ll be submtlled tor all ij)pllcallons for rllSidential uses. accessory uses. nonresidentlal uses. fences. \ Signs. vested rights. development agreements, seawalls, docks. marinas and other marine structures and home oc.c:upaliOC'ls. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGE~T--.JNFORMATION: w {t T~ R APPLICANT NAME MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER 'l~'7 - 4 L.{ 7- Lj Lj Ll Lj FAX NUMBER : '7 J-- PROPERTY OWNERS (Ust all oWners) AGENT NAME !;. 3 3 '7 5-1;- MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER : _...!t.:J '] - 4 4 4 y FAX NUMBER: L/ if L - to;L PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS: :;. i"{ .5-!l- }) A- f..) \ E..- L S:T. C L/~ fJ R. u.;' ;4' E. 1'( , F L ~ _..1. '7 (, I Lot 4 J 13 Loc.. K -g. rtel< G Y?'5 S u ,3J)/V j SID IJ . A 5 f?E-LDf<bE /) , to! PLfF,.... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: f3ot" -30 PA bE U I L. t.. a(.' R .5 0 F .'" 'lIJ""', t /- . f1{/~/J/('" ( 1':(7 -. fI<V} ~ \ o Q \ o \J) PARCEL NUMBER: J.~- b f'lANN1NG & DEVELOPMENT NO crrv OF CLEARWATER PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: (number of dwelling units. holel rooms or SQuare footage of 1\ SIZE OF SITe: DeSCRIPTION OF ReQUEST: DOES THIS APF'LICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVelOPMENT RIGHTS? YES I, the undersigned. acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEllAS Swom to and subscribed before me this ;;l. Y -:cJ, day of H A-i . A.D., 10 l.ooo to me and/or by f3 fHQ 'I T. Voe.. c=.. l . who is ersonally .known has produced ide tification, ~-LfV . Notary public. my commission expires: 1 FOR PLANNING OFFICE USE ONLY: lAND USE DISTRICT OF PARCEL: ZONING: ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACCNT PARCELS: NORTH: FUTURE DESIGNATION' ~_.. ~^ SOUTH: ~ EAST:._ 0 ;--WEST ~ Q .1Z!OG SC(;Tr~. ---&lA- E;'S'" ~/OG... WESi FUTURE l.J\ND USE CLASS:C!CATION m: ADJACENT PARCELS: NORTH: ~/v aBed ~~~V8:6 00-8G-Ae~ ~ ~ m ~8v890L ~30I~~O M~l NON~3^ :A8 +uas ~ a6E~ ~~~T~~n ^~W, ~'n~I~~^ I In l~""~Qnl ~w~ev:e 00/8~/9 :pa^Ta8a8 CITY OF eLF UUY A'l'~K . AFFIDAVIT TO AlJ~oH~ZE AGENT . PLANNING & DEVEWPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SQlmI MYRTLE AVENUE. 2'" FLOOR PHONE (127)-562-4S61 FAX (127) 562-4576 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS BAR'R i S, Vu bE- L (Name off IH property owners) 1. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: AODRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION: ;). 7 S f>- ~ A- ~ \ ~ L S', C LE n R l:..J dor I"" R, F L 3 3 ? (, I LoT t..i. i}LDLI<...3. Ac.t<'tz.f?lS SUi~~'\JI.siDI0. J7.-s RELo\'?0E..1 flU j?L'')-1 f3ubl 30 \JA,=>E cr, e<...b~~5 ("F P v(:':'LLrH C:Cl.-I\J- FLoRI 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: I ~y~ / t!:brNt- of ~ ~l2-/ . ~ II dw'(j (Nature of requcrst) 3. That the undersigned (!1aslhave) appointed and (d~es/i9J appoint S M (l R~lJ S VEt? jU l\ tv, E S Qw I R C- IS (hisllheir) agent(s) to eKec:ute any petitions or other documents neceaary to attect such petition: 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; That (I/we), th\ unders authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY O~INELLAS Swom to and subscrtbed before me this ~ 4 -, day of H Ai. A.D., 3 .20c.d to me and/or by \'=3 f+ R 1<1 ~. ~: .c. [~ E.- L , who is personally knQMthas produced 1--> J 11-- ."...,...-----.--- '. - as identification. SIGNED (Property Owner) ,...,- ~"u.u", LOUISE HOVE /~..-.f.y.rI'Pf1:...... i*: ~.: MY COMMISSION # CC 634278 ~. ~:.;/ EXPIRES; April 14, 2001 Ilonded Thru Notary Public Underwrlters SIGNED (Property Owner) SIGNED (Property Owner) Notary public. My commission expires: r;,/r;, aBed ~W~V8:6 00-8C-ABW ~~~O~8V890L I .3~I~~O M~l NON83A :A8 luas ~~V9V:9 OO/8Z/9 :pa^Ta~a8 9 aBed ~30I~~O MV' NON83^ <- ~ ~O ~8v890L --,,_.-. r;' IN' # 98-083208 MAR 19, 1998 4:09PM . J RETURN TO: ARTA 24701 U.S. Hwy.19Nortb Suite 102 Clearwater, FL 34623 (813) 791-7677 1~~fO~ 0 IJI RECORDIl'JG REC L02.. I ~~, ~{pS;~~(J INT Hcr:S r,,1 f'F COUNTY FLA,? PINELLAS10029 PG 106 OFF,REC.BK r.(' 9C' . Vi Vl:.v-vUGEL RECORDING DOC STAMP - DR219 ..... .u. .\.I.\.IV 1 SlO.50 3 $565.60 REV -----_ rW-"'K ^ TOTAL: "'~ \, H/fT. TF.NDERF.~! 1" f)1~\' 520j 0 CIlIlNGE: C~~YDEED' 0 [E(G[E~\y~ (n~ ,Ii. ili I' ! $576.10 $576.10 $.00 I ~ . : 1--'... i TIllS DEED, made this ~ day o~. 1998 ~I!; ^ _ ,~,;~9UNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision, 315 Court Street, C earwater, FL ~;3I15;6:fparty of the ft$t part, and James A. Vogel and Hazel E. Vogel as Trust s, U/T/WTdit'€cr::5r24!!9'5;Epllrty of ~e second part, whosemailingaddressis386BellePointDrive.St. Pete Beach~Ffor1da 33706. That the party of the fIrst part, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 to it in hand paid by the party of the second part, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the party of the second part, their successors and assigns forever, the following described land lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Subject to Easements and Restrictions of record. ...- D(,Cll~l~r.t,,~y T1X Pd. $ _ ~ J ." cJ t ____ _.__ ____._________lrJlaflgib!o -lax Pel. l<'i,t'.l,;n r. P-~..5-C18rk. PiOOl!i.lB County 8y_ _-/..J:C.:"____ Deputy Clerk Parcel Number: 28/28/16/00036/003/0050 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Board of County Commissioners acting by the Chairman of said Board, the day and year aforesaid. ATTEST: KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER Clerk of the Circuit Court B~I::,;"... ,:' ~~~ r~' r, ':, ..-,'~ '~:t'~ - . -, \.-; /. : '-'If -' . .. _~~'.~ ., '.. : (Official Seal) ,.....;1 '" :. _ '" .. ,-.. : , ".. ~ . ~ 97408.ded -'. ..........., .' ,.. B~ice::-/ airman ,} /;Oii,j1:, . f , , ~ . . . , ~ 4 ..' I" ~ELLAS COUNTY FLA, ~~~F~C,BK 10029 PG 1068 \..A.ND . PINELLAS COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS LAND SURVEY DIVISION 22211 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 N. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765-2347 SECTION(S) 28, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST Additions or deletions by other than the Professional land Surveyor in re.pansible charge is prohibited. land Description is invalid without signature and/or embossed seal of the Prafes.ianal land Surveyor I.';., " DESCRIPTION t All of Lot 5, together with a portion of Lots 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Block SUB-DIVISION, according to plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 30, records of Pinellas County, Florida, in Section 28, Township 28 South, Pinellas County, being described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Block 3, run S 89'37'09" E along the South line of said Block 3, for a distance of 315.67 ft. to the Southwest corner of said Lot 10, for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N 00'l7'43"E along the West line of said Lots 10, 9 and 8, for a distance of 145.65 feet to the most Southerly Corner of said Lot 5; thence N 44'33'30"W, for a distance of 120.00 feet to the most Westerly Corner of said Lot 5; thence N 45'26'30" E along the Northwest line of said Lots 5 and 6, for a distance of 178.97 feet; thence S 05'26'12"E, for a distance of 75.11 feet; thence S 00'13'20"E, for a distance of 282.30 feet to a Point of Intersection with the South line of said Lot 10; thence N 89'37'09"W along said South line, for a distance of 52.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 24,112 sq. ft. or 0.554 acres M.O.L. BEARING BASIS: Florida State Plane Coordinate System; West Zone; North American Datum of 1927; Established by the National Oceanic Survey; Grid North. SKETCH--NOT A SURVEY w. ",r-. o~ ;"'1{) ,.,- 1>>'" '" Vl LOT 11 60' w > <( III W -l a:: <( I U zz o 237+00 I 238+00 , 240+00 I 239+00 CENTERLINE OF MCMULLEN-BOOTH ROAD ~E OF THE SW ll4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 28-28-16 CAlCULATED BY: dwb CHECKED BY: C,N. S.t.N.: DATE , LANJ)'"'SURVEYOR CERTIFICATE N PHONE # (813) 464-8904 3914 067 EXHIBIT ----A- SHEET 1 OF 1 " ~ ~<<) ( J'~ ~ ~> ~ti SCALE 1"= 60' 60 I 120 L \.\\,,"01, " ...\"~~ U.. !"::."' '. ;.,.... ~~"';) I.... '... 'I" . ....... r-v ..- t I ". t.-..::J ...' '.'" ~ \, C1ll )-4-Qo':> 5" ..~.~ . ~ ~ . - \~ . .. -., "IQ . - ~ "'., .Po'., ,!~. 3..., : c-: :: :: . .?~ ~ t4 ~ rnir. Or .: G; ,: ~. fI"". i.) - . :..'.. :... . ,..... \}\.. ,I.', ' :") ,:..~ .... ~L on '. ..' (,y .: ..,....... ')_',,,~.-...,."'.n .J ..,.- " " ~.. ll"" " "'" J <. I~ ".. .\~,\\ ., I I I t I HIU,...\4' SEAL Parcel No.: F901 & r''T"'.,-.,.,.--r''~-'--'~-----'-'---;-J .,-.--:--... ... . ,,-----.~- . ' . R'!JU"'" to: (enclo$ed S8If,address~dstamped envelope) " ~ " ' , American Realty ,Title Agency Inc. AIlc!ress:. 24701 US 19:N....Suit. ,102' Clearwatet.,FL 33763 This insU)JlTla.nt'Prepared:by: CYNTHIA D. GIUNTA American Realty Title Agency Inc. 24701 US 19 N.,SUite 102 ' Clearwater, F,l 33763 ARTA '14468,2 ' PropertY Appraisers parc!lllcientillcation (Folio) Numlier(s): . '.'~ .....-.----..,...-... , '~~:~~,~.:::!."C.~~:~~~~.~j1:.;J~-~~9;:::.S::-~..i.~.'~ \ /NOI\IlO. TO INDMD. P I NELLRS c::0 SI< : 10S22' PD' e1i . ,...........: ,'3 6048 555':' 08-11-1'3'39 . .01 DED-PUCKETTE ' RE RDIHG : 1 . DO STAIlP," DR21'3 . 3 .. TOTAL: CHECK AIlT. TENDERED: 17:25:18 '6.00 S432.SO' S443.SO '443.50 ,', SP....CE AeOVE THIS UHf: fOR ~ESSlNG DATA SPACE. ABOVE THeS UN ,! ,\ ; 2 5 7L~' 28/28/16/00036/003/0040 ' This: Warranty [)eed Made the 26TH ~ of ~ULY 1999 A.D. ;by RONALD J..PUCKETTE, A MARRIED PERSON hereinafter, called 'Ihe grantor. to BARRY .I.. VOGEL, A MARRIED PERSON PLANNING DEVE~O MENT S RVICES CI,TY OF CLEARWA ER whose pOSI office address is. 504 WESTBOROUGH LANE. SAFETY HARBOR. FL hereinafter called the grantee: ' , (Wheuvet uStd' heuin rhe re'ms~granro" and .granlee' include, all the parti~s ro this instrumlnJ and /he, heirs. I'gol ,ep,esen/(Jtives and iJSsigns of individUJJIs. and rhe succeSS1'S and iJSsigns of corporalion) Witnesseth: T1!at the grantor. for and in consideration 0; the sum 4 $10.00 and other Valuable co, ideiptions. rece, ipt WhereOf, '.'S hereby a .,.Ckn. ow ledged. here, bY, grants. bargains. sells;. auei remises. releases. conveys and, confirms unto the ~rtijltee all that certain land situate in PINELLAS County, State of Florid . viz: ' . .' Lot 4,Block 3; ACKER'S SUBDIVISION, acco~ding to the map ~ plat thereof recorded in Plat Book , 30. Page 91. Public Records of Pinellas County, Rorida.-" " SUBJECT TO' easements, restrictions and reservations of record. r i -THIS 15 NOT THE HOMESTEAD ADDRESS OF GRANTOR'S SPOUSE, BRENDA PUCKETrE. HER ~OMESTEAD ADDRESS IS IN FACT: S'(c '1";- Z.inl1\CLA~"J Hi 1{'a\4..) FL ~S'.,D .* : Together, with ail the tl!'1ements. hereditaments ;na appurteTlfPlces thereto belonging or in anywise appe~aining. To Hav' and to "old, thesame in fee simple forever. And the g ~ntor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land infee simple; that the' grantor has .goo right and'lawful authority to sell and convey said land. and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the'same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever;' and that saidland'isfree of all encumbrances. except ioxes accruing s bsequent .to -December 31. 1998. In Witn the said grantor has signed and sealed these pres Signature RONALD J. CK 5695 ZINNI~ v.. MILTON. FL 32570 Printed Signature i"~;:-- ~M" '<:L\R213lf ,-/, 7 V ...I,:, . ::\iT ;:u;s , ,'ATF PIC REV T~Y;~l..: ... u1-.7.50 L)ocumorl1Jlry lax ,-(1. ,7./,.....-..- ..... . h,tlInglUle T... P~. . Karleen f. 0 911 lerk, Plnellaa County Deputy elM .' r' , .. STATE OF: FLORIDA COUNTY OF: PINEllAS '9~~t1 IlIT I hereby Certify that on this !Iav. before me.. an officer duly. . authorized to admini!lter oaths and take aCknowladgments,. personal!v' appeared'" ..._":. .' . '.;'~o"..,,' h~~' r:: . . FILE fk O()~os -f'}... . NARRATIVE SUPPORTING APPLICATION FOR "FLEX" DEVELOPMENT OF INFILL PARCEL AND IN SUPPORT OF LAND USE AMENDMENT 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Pinellas County acquired much of the frontage of the parcel by condemnation to widen McMullen Booth Road. As a result, the parcel is of odd and difficult geometry and without the requested approvals the site would undevelopable. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive In.fill Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The abutting parcels are zoned office, commercial and medium density residential and the use is consistent with the land use and abutting uses. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive In.fill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The abutting parcels are zoned office, commercial and medium density residential and the use is consistent with the land use and abutting uses. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive In.fill Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The abutting parcels are zoned office, commercial and medium density residential and the use is consistent with the land use and abutting uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive In.fill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of ClealWater. The office use planned by the applicant will provide a need in an area of ClealWater that needs additional office space. Other locations in Clearwater will not :fill this current market requirement. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive In.fill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate vicinity is in transition as numerous lots are vacant and ready for demolition. A new office in this location will increase overall property value in the area. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive In.fill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The immediate vicinity is in transition as numerous lots are vacant and ready for demolition. A new office in this location will increase overall property value in the area. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The immediate vicinity is in transition as numerous lots are vacant and ready for demolition. A new office in this location will increase overall property value in the area. 1 . . .. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Ofi:.street parking is available, however, on-site parking meets current codes. 2 ;;;.::.u (rll) · V'cI lO 111M - .- 'lOllS' - 71:<. ~ 3.LIHOI::IY e:u. Y10088 lOt OllIS 'l""l! - 0lqJlU0 V" 19)11YM 1"3 ~ ~ ~~ :! ~ <{ f ~ ~ ~ <( S ~ ~3E X 0 $ ~ gz ~~ -' j <if!! ;: ~. !I'd) ~ i ~ ~lt~ I ~i 1 m if ~ ~ ~ ~~E ~ h ~ ~ji=ti~ > -' _ Ii' ~~ ~ >- ~ ~ ~-g~ w ~ d ~ <ig<i1tJ ~ ~ :I lj' i a;UG '\ o ~?!i ~g~~ ~(u~ >- d;t ~ m;rrR ~ o Alli~O ~ ~ ~ i ~i~~ ~ ra~ 1'Ho 8 h 2 ~f~~ .~~ u 0 @<)rr d) '<l -1 -1 ill Z 0:: . Ii) , It. r o ?i ~ ~ s: ~ ~ ~ ~ ::; ~ ~ m u <( u ~ i ... r '" oc r 0 t-- Ht ?j _ ~ t-- 8G(il ~lLt-- ll.,.' 11l~1I\(il_~lLli:li:t: ~ r:-~(illl\ ~~ "'N~~~ ~ It- " NOll., '" 0 <I) ~ m ~ ill . <I) a (il If> ~ . :::) 0... ~ \0 W ll., a.... ;::::: Ii: t-- t-- t-- t-- <I) ~ 1l1l\_<,\_lLlLlLlL (il 0..."I1l)~~\!l1l\(il~ ~~ _ .... N N ;'!; ell ~ ~ 3: ~./ '>l Ii! S ~.... u ~ ~_~Ill~<t:ili!~ 3 ~ t-- III III r ~ 111 t-- t-- _ III t-- t-- - iJI: r: ~a~<OlIlm~~~ II -l ,+-<O ~~~ ~~95~:iX511l~~oz _lL_r:r:~IlQI1l~:::!): r:lL<o~o...i8~ <f) Ht u ~ w ~ ~ r: ~ ~ <{ = ~ Ii! $) o <{ ~ ~ ~ ~ <I) <i5 2 W / ~'0 /' ~~~00' . a 0 !!l .dP . It) ~'t>0 , "< :;;r'J .r; .,.-tf<.., . " ~Cy<~ ~ ~~ '%0 "0 ~ . r ~ W ~ ~ x w \r:mJo"U 13ElO^ A' U '~31 VM~V31:l t1"VB ONIOllne 30ll0.:l 1.:1.:10 3S0dOl:ld t-- Z W r:O Ww <l)t-- ~~ Wu r<{ t:> :::!w Sill - a \!It-- I ~ a t-- <I) t-- <I) X w II ~ G n '<( ~ :J: t- O 2 m -1 -l :3 ~ u.; <f) t: ~ t-- u.; , lL Ii: <I) - 11\ 11\ ~ ~ 11\ N N ~ t-- lL 11\ o u.; <{t-- <I) alL- \0 llllll\:!::~ ~ ~ :::J a III a ~ II ~ r: ~ w z <I) uli:iW<f)<I)Il~ <or::]-lwa 2~f!!!itoc <{wu~~W ..J o...r:oG~ 3nN3A'V' 93-~ la'V'H:J BARRY J. VIGEl UCENsm RW ESTATE BRIIER 504 WESTBOROUGH LANE - SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 Phone (727) 797-9599 - Fax (727) 797-9599 - Email Vogel Brkr @aol.com JUNE 7, 2002 DR. DAVID PETERSON 3231 McMULLEN Boom ROAD SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 RE: OFFICE BUILDING 2750 McMULLEN-BOOTH ROAD CLEARWATER, FL 33761 DEAR DR. PETERSON: mE CITY OF CLEARWATER HAS REQUESTED US TO SUBMIT A SHORT SYNOPSIS OF mE USE YOU PLAN FOR mE OFFICE BUILDING. PLEASE INCLUDE IN YOUR RESPONSE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: (1) USE, IE. ORmOPAEDIC (2000) PHYSICAL THERAPY (5000) (2) NUMBER OF DOCTORS (3) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (4) PATIENTS SEEN ON AN HOURLY BASIS (5) PATIENTS SEEN ON A DAILY BASIS (6) HOURS OF OPERATION (7) PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS (8) ANY OTHER INFORMATION THAT YOU FEEL WOULD BE PERTINENT IN OBTAINING mEIR PERMISSION TO OCcupy mE PREMISES. THE REQUEST SHOULD BE ON YOUR LETTERHEAD ADDRESSED TO: MARK PARRY PLANNING DEPT. CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL THEY WILL REVIEW THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED, AND IF mEY FEEL THE PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE ARE COMPATIBLE WITH YOUR PROPOSED USE OF THE PREMISES, THEY MAY APPROVE YOUR OCCUPYING THE BUILDING. &RIOR TO THIS SUBMITTAL, WE WILL NEED TO HAVE A LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN US) SINCERELY c.. <.... ~C\\. \c ~~"'l ::h ~~~\f''e~ "' -" ()n\~\C:\rY:::\1 ~a -r. r ~ \~ ~ \V \~ - ,Y' '-' \,..) (~J>c....fJ JO ~ I , \-W~\jf\\... , GS~ ~~~~ UG., 1000SF Qe<V lo ~Q., l~~ N6 Ie ~,:,~~ ~ - ~~o~ ~9: V.T~ ~ooo 'Sr <1 ~K:"'<s \i5ffil~~~ 2:s p~~~ ~c\"c t\ L Q.~tV ~ ~ ~~k- i~ ~..~ + \0 ~(,N~ ~ ..: ,/' - .- ~~ David Petersen, M.D. Board Certified Orthopedic Surgeon 3251 McMullen Booth Road, #102 Clearwater, FL 33761 Phone: (727) 724-3985 · Fax: (727) 726-7553 Mark Parry Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL Dear Mr. Parry, In response to Barry Vogel's letter dated June 7, 2002 regarding his office building located at 2750 McMullen Booth Road, Clearwater, FL 33761, I provide the following information. 1. 2000 sq. feet of the 7000 sq. fo ilding will be utilized by myself for orthopedic surgery office visits. 3000 sq. feet of the same building will be uti ized isY mysel for physical therapy activities. The remaining 2000 sq. feet is slated to be rented by Mr. Albert Rosati for use a BackOffice ~ company. I have discussed this parking situation with Mr. Rosati and he claims he would need a maximu six s e does not have any traffic through his office since it is a BackOffice only. The remaining 19 parking spaces would be utilized by myself for the 5000 square feet that I will be leasing. 9 of the 19 spaces will be utilized by my office staff total for both the orthopedic surgery office and the physical therapy facility. This leaves 10 spaces for patients. I see between 25 and 30 patients per day and the physical therapy facility will see between 20 and 30 patients per day as well. Ifwe take the worst-case scenario of60 patients per day this works out to approximately eight spaces per hour and within the 10 spaces available for patients. 2. I am the only physician that will be on the premises, and I have complete control over the scheduling of patients to accommodate the parking situation in both my office as well as the physical therapy facility. 3. Mr. Rosati has five employees and does not plan on increasing this number. That requires six vehicles and six parking spaces total. 1 have six employees in my orthopedic surgery office including myself, and 3 employees in the physical therapy facility. This adds up to nine spaces total which leaves 10 spaces for patients. 4. Patients seen on hourly basis is equivalent to 5 in each area. Obviously, the patients in my office will be coming and going with a maximum of five vehicles at anyone time. The physical therapy facility will likewise see approximately five at anyone time. 5. My hours of operation for my orthopedic surgery office are from 9 AM to 5 PM Monday through Friday. The physical therapy facility may have hours running from 7 AM to 7 PM Monday through Friday. Mr. Rosati runs from 9 AM to 5 PM as well. 6. In a worst-case scenario, I will lease a van to shuttle my office staff from the hospital parking lot to our office each morning and evening if the parking appears too tight. If there are any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office. rvvo cc: Barry Vogel 504 Westborough Lane Safety Harbor, FL 34695 ~ NORTH 1 "=200' .. Aerial Map Barry j Vogel 2755 Daniel Street FL 00-05-17 .~ ~ g Cl/l % fl :1- w . ~!P CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBIJC WORKS ADMINISTRATIO:N ENGINEERING .. ~ NORTH 1"=1320' Location Map Barry J. Vogel 2755 Da.niel Street FL 00-05-17 Q: a ... Q: o J: <II ~~SR 580 .... Q: ~ g SR 590 ii: WAU<ER RO "'I HUMPHRIES RD / l{ "",'illi",,, l ~ SEA~""'--... l'-'M"':. ... ...\1,... ::l-:. :!: C') ~ ' ~ ~~ ~~ ~ '1>., & I ~..~~rER _''i',:.l ~""'''H''''' CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINIST RATION ENGINEERING . AUNITY IDE SCHOOL J ;;;: !:!:!. ..0:: ~ ~ (3 ~ ..0:: CO> o ,.~ ALLEN g,., AVE. 4309- 42 QeD 8041-75 CO> Q:j C> ~ fj o cD ~ ..... ~ 8 (;j 3 E I o I- ..0:: a:: o ~ 0> <:: .~ e 9 o all % .. ~ w 100 2678 ~680 2682 HE VININGS 2652 ~---..., (i)~ AT fr56.22l ',y '" w .... FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST OWNER: Barry J. Vogel 1 CASE FL 00- 05-17 ADDRESS: 1721 Rainbow Drive I ZONING OfficE' ATLAS PAGE: 212A I SEe: 28 I TWP: 28S I RANGE: 16E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD . ~~ ~ ~p~ ~""'~ . " ~(b ffJf\I \,~ ~ co,JI 9 10 .... 9 CD 10 Ii U < w 11 ~ ~, :::!;. < :8 a; .., cO C> S ~ . ~ "- 8 G; ~ ALLEN AVE. ci a:: A COUNTY .... CD 31/05 IJ:: w a:: r- U <( i!: IJ:: :I: o f- ~ ~ OWNER: COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP Barry J. Vogel lD c 1 ADDRESS: 1721 Rainbow Drive ZONING Office ~ % ATLAS PAGE: 212A SEe: 28 ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD w ;; o o IXl Z LIJ ..J ..J ::> ::E o ::E dO~ "1, r. jOb~l(~ CASE FL 00- 05-17 RANGE: leE , , ... A.&PLICATION FOR SITF ?I..I\.N APPRUVAL \'[PL~NG & DEVELOPMENT SEk_~ADMINISTRA TION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE ^ VENUE. 2nd FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 Tllia fomI must be suhmillad for ill ;apolleallons for residential uses. aeoeS$OIY uses. nonresidenllal uses. fences. Signs. veslAld rights, del/elopment agreements, seawalls, docks. marinas and other marine structures and home occupations. APPUCANT NAMe APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION: VDbEL II--' i3 N:..i ':1 R LEARL0 AlE MAILING ADDRESS i '1 .,). 7 - L/ 4 7- ...,. l.f 4 L/ FAX NUMBER: PHONE NUM8ER PROPERTY OWNERS (Ust all oWners) AGENT NAME 5"S- MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER . -", Lf4Lft..i FAX NUMBeR : STREET ADDRESS: PRoposeo DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: JJ. l\J \ G.L S-. y Me-I Lo I~. 5'", (.., '7, <j. cr, Ie 13cL. L> J ;.lbE - LEGAl.. DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: d-:' - d... ~.- I ~ - D DO 3 . .- D 6 3 - Db 5;;,- 0 SIZE OF SITe: D, !J-S- Lf PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: (number of dwelling units. hotel rooms or SQUare footage of 00 DESCRIPTION OF REQueST: Does THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVEL.OPMENT RIGHTS? YES I, the undersigned. acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowled e. FOR PLANNING OFFICE USE ONLY: 0 I LAND USE DISTRICT OF PARCEL: ZONING: FUTURE DESIGNAjION: ~I 0& ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACCNT PARCELS: NORTH: C SOUTH: CuVYI f'J EAST: .,~'f.I~'l WEST -Q-~ FUT\)R~ lJ\ND US!: CLASS:F!CATION ()F ADJACENT PARCELS: NORTH: . (:6 SO(;Trt ~~_ E;"S" ~_. WESi" ~ut 91v aced !wvve:6 Oo-eZ-Aew !~~o~eve9oL , .30I~~O MVl NONH3^ :A8 +uas ~~~gv:g OO/8~/9 :pa^.aoa~ V aBed !30I~~O M~I NON~3^ <- ~~O~8v890L ~ CI'l~ OJ:!' l,;L" ~ ftlJ:!.,A . AFFIDAVIT TO AU.f:':I~ZE AGENT , PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINlSTRA nON MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 soum MYRTI..E AVENUE. 2'" FLOOR PHONE (727)-5624567 FAX (727) 562-4576 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS J~HE-S (+. VbGGL (Name off ell property owners) 1. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: ADDR~:: GENERAL lOCATION: JY/1.l..i \ G: L 5"', 'Y He.. tML~ tJ 8C.(TH' l?v LbTS .6- L.. '7 $I 9 /0 . <.. 6.R' 5 Si.'U' V 5 i () r-JA5 ' o ' ) ~>E. q I Q, L( ~ qc.:.u~1' () F'. LL r S C:.~tJ 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (Nat'" or request) 3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint - - '3" H.~ f\J ~ US' E. IV b ~f E S' q w i as (hisnheir) agenl(S) to execute any petitiona or other doc\.IMnts nICHSlIry to ertect such 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of on the above described property; I PLANNING & DEVELOPM-ENT e foregelnO fcf-8V[J& I8nd correct. mo"df ~LtARWATER ~,_J STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before me this ,;. Y. ti day of g tq. ~ . A.D., _ )J..JOl) to me and/or by . it H E.5 If-. \ / DC.,. G- L , ~o is personally , ---=---.-------.- knoWl'!l'as produced I-J i t1. as identification. SIGNED (Property Owner) SIGNED (Property owner) ~/~' / :::-. ~~ 7-,1,1"- NolaIy public. My commission elCplres: ,,,'''~''t..,,, LOUISE HOVE ~I!'i..~ l.: . \:. MY COMMISSION' CC 834276 \j, :} EXPIRES: Aprl114, 2001 .' II!"Y:: ~o~~ ~~~~~~~~ Unde~ers It SIGNED (Property OWner) ~/~ aBed !WVV€:6 OO-€Z-Aew !~~O~€v€90L 9 aBed !3~I~~O MV' NON83^ <- ~~O~~v890L I .30I~~O MVl NON~3^ :A8 +uas !~VRv:R on/~~/q :paftTanRH .LICATION FOR SITE p~ APPRUVAL ILA~'NING & DEVELOPMENT SER ~Er'ADMINISTRA TION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDlNG. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE. 2nd FLOOR ~l PHONE (727).562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 ~ tif Q. This form must be submilled tor all applications for residential u~9, accessory uses. nonresidenllal uses, fences. V\.r Signs, vested rights, development agreements, seawalls, docks. marinas and other marine structures and home oc.cupaliOl1s. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGE~t-JNFORMATION: APPLICANT NAME : i ~ \ -" \y . E. L MAILING ADDRESS I' Q ft I t-.l 13 D w ':t R L E ..l: W f\T~ R PHONE NUMBER 1~f'] - 4 L{ 7 - Lj Y LJ Lj FAX NUMBER: ry;)... PROPERTY OWNERS (Ust all oWners) AGENT NAME S. H ~ t< ~ w' ) V F- ~ rV C> f.-) E 5 ~ ~ ~ i3 D l>.i <!? LE. (t '3 3'7 ~-6- MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER ; _." H-~ 1 - Y 4 4 Y ifL-fad-- FAX NUMBER : PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS: ,/J P LfF-r- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: ~S$'- - 1(." - PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: (number of dwelling units. holel rooms or SQuare footage of SIZE OF SITE: PlANN\NG & DEVELOPMENT NO C\lY Of CLEARWATER DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS? YES I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ;;l Y ~\ day of H Y+if . A.D., 15 avo 0 to me andlor by i'3 fHQ 'I -'\. Vex. ~ L , who is ersonally .known has produced - ide tification, ~. Notary public. my commission expires: f.:'~ .-- '! tI) '- l/j '~1/1Itf!'111 Il . ".1 iJ.',~ . j ;.ItV} i ~ \ o Q \ o \f) 1 FOR PLANNING OFFICE USE ONLY: .. . ~~ LAND USE DISTRICT O~ PARCEL: ZONING: FUTURE DESIGNATION: ~...,-.. 1)..\ 1" ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACeNT pPoRCELS: NORTH: 0 S UTH: ~ EAST: .._, 0 -;:--WEST ~ {I FUT\)RE l.J\NO uSE CLASS:~!CATION ClF ADJACENT PARCELS NORTH: .woe; SC\.;Tr!. --&y.- E;'S' ~/()G... WESi SIP aBed ~~~P8:6 00-8~-Ae~ ~~~O~8P890L ~3~I~~O M~l NON~3^ :A8 +uas ~~~gv:g OO/8Z/9 :pa^Ta~a8 .L. =Re>_, &" --'_"- _.1.-11""'\ "/1."-,,,,, "'n",u~^ , ,n t(:'"t-,.(:'"on' CITY OF eLF ~ A'l'~K . AFFIDAVIT TO AUj:>fldW!ZE AGENT . PLANNING & DEVELOPl\iENT SERVICES ADMINlSTRA nON MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOunI MYRTLE AVENUE. 211II FLOOR PHONE (727)-5624567 FAX (727) 562-4576 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS BRR'Ry :r. 00 bE L (Name off I" property owners) 1. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: AODRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION: ;). 7 S f>- ~ fj. t...\ \ G. L Sr c. LE n R L>.l ,/'t-T I~R, F L 33? (, I LoT t.j. [lLD(.,<.3. ACKE.f?\S SUi~~I\JISiD~. A-~ RELo4?I)a:.1 ItV PLn-, 13ub{ 30 \JA'=>.E'1', ec...bR.:Us (,p p" LLrl$ C:bL) ,- 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: I .A>>f/ky,~ / ti~~ or- /ArVo v>tE-/ . ~." dwl(J (Natura of request) 3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (d~es'i91appoint :s M 1'1(< Q.U S V E f? \'0 D tv, E S Q 0 I R. ~ lK (hisllheir) agenl(S) to execute any petitions or other documents IlICeSI8fy to etreet such petition: 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OUINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ 4 - I day of H ,,, { . A.D., 3 .20c.d to me and/or by \-=3 it R R"; ~. V D {.'" E- L . who is personally knQWO.has produced I--> i n- ~- . ---- . as identification. SIGNEO (Property Owner) .~':i~';''''' LOUISE HOVE j~""~~~ MY COMMISSION' CC 634278 ~. / EXPIRES; Aprl114. 2001 -. Bonded Thru NotaJy Public Unde1writ8rs SIGNED (Property Owner) SIGNED (Property Owner) Notary public. My commission expires: t;/t; e6ed !~~v€:6 OO-€~-Ae~ ! ~~O~€v€90L !30IjjO M~l NON~3^ :A8 +ues ~WYBv:B oo/~~/s :pa^,a~a8 S aBed ~30I~~O MY' NON83^ <- ~~O~~v~90L r"'~'- ..~_..~- '-4. . IN' # 98-083208 MAR 19, 1998 4:09PM . J RETURN TO: ARTA 24701 U.S. Hwy. 19Nortb Suite 102 Clearwater. FL 34623 (813) 797-7677 1'1";10" '0 () J RECOROH1G REC L0..:2! I ~', ~kb.!.b..(J INT '!eES r1 rF UNT'l FLA. PINELLAS 1~~29 pG 1067 OFF.REC.BK ric 9Ci . VI 1I!:.II-vUGEL RECORDING 1 DOC STAMP - DR219 3 TOTAL: CHtrK A~T. TF.NDF.RF.~: ClfIlN(;[: ..... ....... .1J.",v $1 0.50 $565.60 /I..E V -------- T01~\!570.JO {J4g.,; $576.10 $576.10 $.00 COUNTY DEED TIllS DEED, made 1his i.. day o~~, 1998 ~lt. ~. ~~,~;~~TY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision, 315 Court Street, C earwater, FL ~17'5i(ifparty of the f~t part, and James A. Vogel and Hazel E. Vogel as Trust s, U/T/WT(lat'€ci=~r2411951tpl1rty of ~e second part, whosemailingaddressis386BellePointDrive.St. Pete Beach:-F"forlda 33706. . That the party of the fIrst part, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 to it in hand paid by the party of the second part, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the party of the second part, their successors and assigns forever, the following described land lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Subject to Easements and Restrictions of record. ,- Dc-ClI:11!'r.t:,ry Tl, Pd. $ _ ~ J . 00 ~ ---- -___ ____._________ If1Iarlgi!:!o .lax Pd_ '~'i"':F;n r. P.~k<;r".cle'k. Piool!!!!! County By n__/~__ Deputy Clerk Parcel Number: 28/28/16/00036/003/0050 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Board of County Commissioners acting by the Chairman of said Board, the day and year aforesaid. ATTEST: KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER Clerk of the Circuit Court ~.... B~ ...... . ... '. "~<. . eputy Clerk '.. :~'t ;,';> "::.,;':(" .:' < r:~ . "..~ ~;_, ., . '., V' I . : ~..'~ _or , ~:..,' !l' "'-'",,'" .....: . . .. - .. t ~", : . - (Official Seal) . .,'.,.. ~1',' ,p.. . .' , . 97408_ded . . /' -. .' .." . , r' . . . . .. . . . .' " r} '~~!/;j: i : , . .' f',J.,....... ~ " (..""':';'ct . PINELLAS COUN1Y PUBLIC WORKS LAND SURVEY DIVISION 22211 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 N. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765-2347 SECTION(S) 28, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST Additions or delelions by other thon lhe Professionol lond Surveyor in responsible charge is prohibited. land Description is invalid without signature and/or embossed seal of the Professional land Surveyor t.. .NELLAS COUNTY FLA" ~~jF EC"BK 10029 PG 1068 \..~N() DESCRIPTION , All of Lot 5, together with a portion of Lots 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Block SUB-DIVISION, according to plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 30, records of Pinellas County, Florida, in Section 28, Township 28 South, Pinellas County, being described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Block 3, run S 89"37'09" E along the South line of said Block 3, for a distance of 315.67 ft. to the Southwest corner of said Lot 10, for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N 00"17'43"E along the West line of said Lots 10, 9 and 8, for a distance of 145.65 feet to the most Southerly Corner of said Lot 5; thence N 44"33'30"W, for a distance of 120.00 feet to the most Westerly Corner of said Lot 5; thence N 45"26'30"E along the Northwest line of said Lots 5 and 6, for a distance of 178.97 feet; thence S 05.Z6'12"E, for a distance of 75.11 feet; thence S 00. 13'20"E. for a distance of 282.30 feet to a Point of Intersection with the South line of said Lot 10; thence N 89"37'09"W along said South line, for a distance of 52.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 24,112 sq. ft. or 0.554 acres M.O.L. BEARING BASIS: Florida State Plane Coordinate System; West Zone; North American Datum of 1927; Established by the National Oceanic Survey; Grid North. SKETCH--NOT A SURVEY u..i > <t: VI W --l a::: <t: :r: u LOT 4 ~ O-<l ~~ ( U'~ (<'0- w. bJ" aU! ;..If) ,.,- !n'" ., Vl LOT 11 60' lOti LOT 10 LOT 9 LOT 7 LOT 6 2Z'" SCALE 1"= 60' ! I o 60 I 120 L 237+00 I 238+00 I 240+00 I . d" 111111, " ,,"'::' \\ !: ~ ' , .:-\, ~..";:) I:....~..l,... .::". r<\'" .... t, 0", ~-l.-:J ..' '... ~ \. C21l )-.J.QO':> ~~ . ~ ~ . _ \b .. __ '. -., fll^ . .= ,." ."'..J l' ~J,,!l.... ~ ~ c'::' :; .' . ?~ ~ t'1 ~ r1':\1~ Or .: G; :.: ~ r~ *'. J' \, ,: /:~ : ':.'1 ~.'~ .... !:'r on \ ~.' c,y ~ "., .. '- .' ~ J .' '~" '. .~... ....... ,n ...,' ". " ~" 1..'\" " ".,11-.1.... ,,,. .\", 'J"/IIU.U"'-'" 239+00 CENTERLINE OF MCMULLEN-BOOTH ROAD ~E OF' THE SW 1L4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 28-28-16 S.t.N.: was prepared under elief. q CALCutATEO BY: dwb supervision and is true and CHECKED BY: C.N. 067 DATE . LANo-" SURVEYOR CERTIFICATE N PHONE # (813) 464-8904 3914 SEAL EXHIBIT -L SHEET 1 OF 1 Parcel No.: F901 .. c '=:..... d':::;;f;.~...: ............. ....~8k,i1,.ft-~~~~~;;..;.~j:a ~. . AmericBnR.aIty.ull. Agency Inc. 'lNDf\IIO; TO INDMD'.. P JNE:LLRS CO SI('.10S22- PD-' e';.: . hi<lr..s: ~~:~~:;.1:L~3~~~.102. . . 1...........-, . .. ~. ThisinstUJm..nt .Pr.p.r.d'by:CYNTHIA D_ {3IUNTA Am.ric.n ReeJtv i1II. Agency Inc. 24701 US 19 N...SlIit. 102 . CIt..rwat!lt', F.L 33763 ARTA .14468-2 .. PropertY Appreisers P.rc,l Identiflcetlon (Folio) Numlier(s): .. '3 86048 $55': 08-11-1'3'3'3 . .01 DED-PUMTTE . . RE RDING: . i . DO STAIIP.... DR21'3 . : ~ 3 .. TOTAl: CHECK AIlT. TENDERED: 17:25:18 . $6.00. $432.50 $443.50 $443.50 '1.... SPACE,ABOVE THeS UN ~J '.':.2 5 f'''.~; ;\:i LLL~; 281.281.161.000361.003/0040 SPACE ABOVE THIS UNE FOR ,..;)CESSlNG DATA ..co This. Warranty peed Miuie the 26TH'!<<Y of ~ULY 1999 A,D. ;by RONALD J..PUCKETTE. A MARRIED PERSON hereinafter called (he grantor. to BARRY J.. VOGEL. A MARRIED PERSON whose post office address is. 504 WESTBOROUGH LANE, SAFETY HARBOR, FL 695 PLANNING DEVEI,.O MENT S RVICES CITY OF CLEARWA ER hereinafter cailed the grantee: ' . (WhUtVU ustd hutin tht turns 'grantor' and 'granlee' inclwk all the panies to this instrumml and the . heirs. Itgal TtpTtStntativts and assigns of individUD/s. and the succtss)rs and assigns of corporalion) . Witnesseth: Tl!at the grantor. for and in consideration 0; the sum of $10.00 and other Valuable co, ideifltions. receipt whereof I.-S hereb..'Y .a.Ckn. oW.'edged. here. by. grants. bargains. sells;. aue, remises. releases. conveys and confirms u~o the~rantee all that certain land situate in PINELLAS County, State of Florid . viz: . : .. Lot 4. Block 3; ACKER'S SUBDIVISION. acco~ding to the map ~ plat thereof recorded in Plat Book . .30. Page 91. Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. .-.-. . . . . SUBJECT TO. easements, restrictions and reservations oj record. r ,'. j ..THIS IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD ADDRESS OF GRANTOR'S SPOUSE, BRENDA PUCKETTE. HER . ~OMESTEADADDRESSISINFACT: $"(P'l, Zinll)c.. AI.U....) Mili-ou-) FL ~S'"10 ,. , Tugether, with pi, thele'lements. hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in. anywise appertaining. ToHav ' and to H.old, the same in fee simple forever. And ihe g ~ntor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land infee simple; that the- graiJt~r has .goo right and. iawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the.same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever,~ and that saidio.nd.isfree of all encumbrances. except iaxes accruings bsequentto-December 3i, 1998. In Witn the said grantor has signed and sealed these pres Signature RONALD J. CK 5695 ZINNI~ V. MILTON, FL 3"2570 oocumenUlry 13"."<1. ,Lf3.7.~~ Q. . hl~ng"'l.. Tu PG. :' l!lFk. Plnell.. County DIIlUlY C'" ." r-- , , Printed Signature ,~~i;- -r~ ,;~~ 6R21~lf ,-/.. ~ D J.:t ::I;T .,'Gf:S . .~ArF PIC REV T!')-r^.t . lj.JI3...!;d7 tP/f ~ STATE OF: FLORIDA COUNTY OF: PINELLAS I hereby Certify that on this !lay. before me, an officer duly. authoriied to admini!>ter oaths and take acknowledgments. personally. appeared. . . ,._-~. .' .. . .. .~. .....CnmnA<HUN1'k .... 0'" . .,. . . ,,~..; .~""l"___;J:.1I'n .10J23 ~: '" . . FI'-I fl- co~os -11- . NARRATIVE SUPPORTING APPLICATION FOR "FLEX" DEVELOPMENT OF INFILL PARCEL AND IN SUPPORT OF LAND USE AMENDMENT 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Pinellas County acquired much of the frontage of the parcel by condemnation to widen McMullen Booth Road. As a result, the parcel is of odd and difficult geometry and without the requested approvals the site would undevelopable. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infi11 Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The abutting parcels are zoned office, commercial and medium density residential and the use is consistent with the land use and abutting uses. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infi11 Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The abutting parcels are zoned office, commercial and medium density residential and the use is consistent with the land use and abutting uses. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infi11 Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The abutting parcels are zoned office, commercial and medium density residential and the use is consistent with the land use and abutting uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infi11 Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The office use planned by the applicant will provide a need in an area of Clearwater that needs additional office space. Other locations in Clearwater will not fill this current market requirement. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infi11 Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate vicinity is in transition as numerous lots are vacant and ready for demolition. A new office in this location will increase overall property value in the area. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel. proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The immediate vicinity is in transition as numerous lots are vacant and ready for demolition. A new office in this location will increase overall property value in the area. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The immediate vicinity is in transition as numerous lots are vacant and ready for demolition. A new office in this location will increase overall property value in the area. 1 . . . . 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Off-street parking is available, however, on-site parking meets current codes. 2 ~.~.. ~ Vel .LO:uJHO -i.j '''''4DH AIOlDS 'lOt - "iI~(&" i1Y 83J.YIOO88 OllIS ~ - ~ It 't l:'.3)(1YM "3 lOt . ~. :t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;; W~ ~ g ~ ~~ " !i.!. r'" ~ i ~ ~Il'~ ~ g ~ ~ l ~m~ % ~ I': ~ .. <(~<( ~ ii' ~ ~ Q~E f ~ > ~ ~ ~~if :, ..." l ;l1g'"" ~ a ~ ~ ! -'g~~ ~ ~ ~~g.~ ~6n t- 1= 1 ~~H m! .,# ~zO f:!l~ ~ ~Q~~ ':v 1'.88 8~~ 2 ~~fs~ .~~ o 0 @()V'" Q) <::[ -1 -1 ill ~ IL .(1) I OC '" oc u: >- 0 d) ~ ~ Q I- o::J Q 11. uOQ Q.Qt::t:I-"'= u:' ~'I::!d~QQ11.11. d)11J . -",:QQQQ '" ~ '" '" '" ~ H- ., '" <:I u.. '" o<fl m 1M ~ m u: ::JOQ~d) u: ILdj~"'1- d)U: 0,-","""'11.1-1-1->- <fl ~1I)_::l-_11.1LILLL Q <,\1l)",:!:l-oIl)QQ ~~ _1'4C'\1C"t~(1)~ ~j! ~ll~ <( ~.Gj:~~<(:i~<( 3~1-1I)1I)\,,<(w >->-_I1J>-I-- OC 0011Jd)11J~~~<( I:oc -1-1II-d);J)~~~ 1!:!<(!t5~:iX~I1J~~O~ -LL-I:f~lf ~~IL<i~~ II) IL .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ u ~ i ~ ;' ~ " . I i 00 d) ~ u <( I1J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <( = <( ~ 9 o <( ~ ~ I!:! ~ d) (jj 2 ~ ,-JI~OlJ 13elO^ ^i:ll:lYB 'ij3.1VMijV31:> elNI01'na 3Jj~1, 3S0dOl::td I- Z I1J I:o I1JI1J ~I- 11J<( >-u !:::~ ~11J ~II) - 0 -11>- I ~ I- d) :0 X IlJ Q o !!) ~ ~ ::t t- O 3 ~ ..J -1 ::3 o r: ...= LL '" u: -:-t:t: d) 1n:Q:Q~~ l- LL II) o u: <(I- d) o LL - -II OCOCII)~~ ~ j! :J 0 II) 0 I1JIL OC II) ...= <(I1JZ d) - ulu~d)d)OC::! ~!;5uJ~S) ~ffio~<(ffi -IILI:On~ anN3A V' sa l?!IV'H:J ] linellas County )e>artment of Public Works . RIGHT OF WAY UTILlZA liON PERMIT I . PERMIT NO: UP 'HE COUNTY OF PINElLAS, a political subdivision of the State of Florida. hereinafter called the Permitter. hereby grants to of (Name) (Street Address, City. State, Zip) lereinafter called the Permittee, a Permit to constructD, operateD, maintainD. renewD and/or removeD on attached plan along, across, beneath, or over ri~ ht of 'lay and/or property of Permitter at the following location: :::ounty Road No. Name: ,ituated at Section Township _ South Range _ . :ast. . Florida, subject to the following provisions and condit ons: (Address Qr Stfgel Interser.tion) 1. Construction, operation and maintenance of such utility shall not interfere with property and rights of prior occupant. 2. The construction, operation and maintenance of such utility shall not create obstruction or conditions which are or may become dang. -rous to the traveling public. 3. All work must be done in keeping with standards of the Florida Department of Transportation Manual of Unjform Minimum Standarc s for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways. Roadway and T raffle Design Standards, Florida' Departme nt of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, AASHTO and by the County Director or his agent. 4. All materials and equipment shall be sl!bject to inspection by an Engineer of the County or his agent. 5. The Permittee shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, ~y the cost of defense, aod save harmless the Permitter from and against pa} ment of all daims, suits, actions, costs. attorneys' fees, expenses, damages, judgments. or decrees by reason of any person or persons or pn perty being damaged or injured by the permittee, his employees, agents or sub-contractors or in any way attributable to the perform. mea, prosecution. construction, operation. or maintenance of Work herein permitted by Permitter and resulting from negligent acts or omis 3ions of said Permittee in connection with the work herein permitted. 6. The Permittee shall repair any damage or Injury to the road or highway or other County property by reason of the exercise of any 'If the privileges granted in this Pennlt. and shall repair the same promptly, within seven (7) days of opening. ~toring it to a condition at least ~qual to that which existed immediately prior to the infliction of such damage or injury. (Note: All portions of the right of way other than paved 3feas disturbed by the construction of this utility will be compacted. grassed and mulched or $odded as required.) 7. All overhead Installations shall conform to dearance standards of the State Utilities Accommodation Guide and all underground ere sSing installations shall be laid at a minimum depth of 36" below pavement, or at such greater depth as Permitter may require. 8. In the event of widening, repair or reconstruction of said road, the Permittee shall move or remove said utility installation at no cost .0 the Permitter. 9. This permit creates a permissive use only and the placing of facilities upon County property pursuant hereto shall not operate to cre ~te or to vest any property rights in said Permitee and is granted in perpetuity subject to tennination by the Permitter upon the giving of 3C -days notice in writing to the Permittee. 10. The Permittee sh<illl fumish the Permitter with a survey showing the exact locations of all facilities to be installed pursu<ilnt to this permi , said survey to be sufficiently detailed to allow location of said installation by reference thereto. Tile attached plan, covering details of this installation. shall be a part of this permit. Upon completion of installation. if field adjustments are made, an as-built drawing will have to be submitted. 11. Section corner monuments subject to displacement shall first be referenced and later reset by a florids Registered Land Surveyor. 12. All activities in accordance with this permit will require conformance to the "Manual on Traffic Control and Safe Practices for Stre It and Highway Construction. Maintenance <ilnd Utility Operations." (Chapter 316 Florida Statutes) 13. The Permittee's attention is directed to the provisions of the Trench Safety Ad (Florida Statutes, Section 553.60 et. seq.) and the Occup. Itionsl Safety and Health Administration Excavation Safety Standards (29 C.F.R Sedion 1926.650. Subpart P) which shall apply to constn Iction, operation, and maintenance pursuant to this permit. 14. Comp<ilction within right of way to meet Pinellss County Minimum Standards. 15. Highway Department is to be notified a minimum of 48 hours prior to beginning work at 464-8900, otherwise the Permit will be voidf d. 16. If this permit is for a monitor well, copies of all testing reports are to be forwarded to the Pinellas County Highway Deptartment. 17. The Permittee shall commence construction within 60 days from the date of this permit and it shall be completed within dE is. Permittee or Agent: Phone: Date: Rev 9/8/99 .APPLlCATION SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTION. ;" Description and nClture of the proposed installation shall be outlined in the two blank lines on application. 2. The bonom of Application Sheet 1 shall be signed by appliCClnt or his agent. 3. On the attached plan. the following data shall be supplied: a. ihe plan shall show the right of way lines and the widths of right of way. The offset distance from the centerline of the pre pose< installation shall be shown and the scope of the proposed project, with all the distances and sizes dearly indicated. b. Typical cross section shall be fumished showing width of pavement, width of right of way on each side. offset distance from cer terlinE to proposed installation and any pertinent data to sidewalks, curbs and gutters, etc. Indicate type of installation on both typical cross section and plan view. d. All pertinent dr'linage information and calculations or justifiCCltion for size of pipe and/or grading. 4. All improvements within County maintained right of W<lY shall conform to Florida Department of Transportation requirements <;!Od/or Finella! County Subdivision requirements. 5. All applications for water and sewer lines must be separate applications and countersigned by the utility involved prior to submittal. 6. This form is to be made out in QUADRUPLICATE with four (4) drawings; one fully executed copy will be returned to yov after apprc val. 7, There is a variable processing fee which must be received prior to the issuance of the permit. Please make check payable to Board of ~ounl'J Commissioners. 8. Due to the extensive work being done in Pinell<ils County right otway. please provide proofthat you meet the following insurance require ments ~Comprehensive General Liability Insurance including, but not limited to, Independent Contractor, Contractual. Premises/Operation: , Products/Completed Operation, Explosion, Collapse and Underground, and Personal Injury covering the liability assumed undE r indemnification provisions of this permit, with limits of liability tor personal injury and/or bodily injury. induding death, of not less tha 1 $300,000, each occurrence; and property damage of not less than $100.000, each occurrence. (Combined Single Limits of not les s than $30Q.OOO, each occurrence, will be accept<ilble unless otherwise stated.) Coverage shall be on an .occurrence" basis, and th ~ policy shall include Broad Form Prooertv Damage coverage. and Fire legal Liabilitv of not less than $50,000 per occurrence, unles s otherwise stated by exception herein." THE UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 'CALL SUNSHINE- f1-800-432-47701 MUST BE NOTIFIED 48 HOUilS JI IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. '- UTILITY COUNTERSIGN Pinellas County Public Works Permitting Services Section 440 Court Street, 2nd Floor Clearwater. FL 33756 (727) 464-3670 (NamelTitle) (lI8te) TO BE FILLED OUT BY PINELLAS COUNlY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Sod required Open cut DYes DYes DNa DNa Jack and bore 0 Yes Directional bore 0 Yes DNo ONo PINELlAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, Acting by Authority af the Board of County Commissioners SEE ATTACHED LETIER FOR ADDIT1CNAL CONDITIONS TO THIS UTILITY PERMll . Date: for Public, Works Permitting Services Section ,/. . . . . Ml'sCELL\1\'EOCS I~HO\'I$IO:\S way in oHler to [)l'"ot(;'(t the public health, safety <)))d gel1t?(";~l welfare of t.he rlfSidQnt.~ oHhe county. COrd. No. 90-13, ~ 3,2-20.90; Ord. No. 92-68, H 3, 18, 10-27-92; Ord. No. 96.60, * 2, 7-16-96) Sec. 170-195. Area (~rn or-need. (n) The areas embrac(~d by this article shall be nil c();mty rights-of-way, whether Or not within municipai boundaries. (b) This article. is not applicable to installa- tions that are already properly placed within the rights--of-way unless they are relocated or modi- fied, but shall apply to those to be placed within the right--ofwway after February 29, 1982. COrd, No. 90-13, ~ 5, 2-20-90; Ord. No. 92-68, ~~ 5, 18, 10-27-92) See. 170-196_ Inspections, enforcement, sto . work orders. (a) The COWlty may conduct inspections to detennine compliance with the provisions of this article. (b) The county administrator Or his designee i authori~ed to enforce the provisions of this arti cle, all other current and applicable county ordi- nances, the right-of~way permit, and to initiate enforcement proceedings, including the issuance of citations in accordance with F.8. ~ 125.69. (c) Work on any installation within the right- of-way that is being done contrary to the provi- sions of this article, Or the terms and conditions of the right-of~way penn it, may be ordered to be immediately stopped under the following condi- tions: 0) In an emergency situation that may have a serious effect on health or safety. (2) When irreversible or irreparable hann may result in the reasonable opinion of the county administrator or his designee, and immediate cessation of the activity is necessary to protect the public and the right-of-way. Notice shall be given by the county administrator or his designee in writing to the owner, agent, Or the person performing the work, and shall state Ow conditions under which work may be re- SllPP. ~"l. ~ CD170:2:3 ~;um0d. Verbal notice shall be tillfficient ill emer' gency !;;ituatjons and shall b~ followed by written notice, <Ord. No, 90-13, * 15, 2-20-90; Oid. No. 92-68, ~~ 1<3, 10, 10-27-92; Ord. No. 96-60, ~ 3,7.16-96) Sec_ 170-197. Appeals and variances. Appeals from adverse decisiG!:~ regarding per- mitting, enforcement, or interpretations of this article shall be sought by utilizing the provisions of section 154-6. Variances from the provisions of this article are to be sought by following the provisions of section 154-4. (Ord. No. 90-13, ~ 11, 2-20~90; Ord. No. 92~68, S2 11, la, 10-27~92; Ord. No. 96-60, S 4, 7-16-96) ~ Sec. 170-198. General access standards. (a) Direct egl"ess' from property adjacent to arterial and collector streets shall be prohibited when egress to a road of lesser designation is available. (b) If a property is located such that access can be provided to either an arterial Or collector facility, access to the arterial facility shall be prohibited. irect access to individual one-family and two-family (duplex) dwellings shall be prohibited on arterial and collector streets, except those for which no other access can he conveniently pro- vided. .' (d) Common access facilities on arterial and collector streets are encouraged when two or more contiguous sites are planned for commercial, of- fice Or indu.strial facilities (two access facilities maximum on property less than 200 feet front- age). (e) Off-street parking shall be designed to en~ sure that all vehicles leaving or entering the public street right-of-way shall be traveling in a forward motion, except driveways serving one- family and two~family dwellings. (f) In addition to the above criteria, an inven- tory has been compiled which claSSifies the vari- ous segments of the cOWlty numbered road sys- tem, aCCOrding to existing and proposed safe access intervals. These intervals will be utilized as a ! , " ~ ': " ,. ~'.\. 1 . . PERMITTING SERVICES 440 Court Street, 2nd Floor Clearwater, Florida 33756-5110 TELECOPIER TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE: G [J2-! oa NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COYER): ~ PLEASE DELIVER IMMEDIATELY TO: NAME: ~ t.\ t\J FROM: PATRICK S. FOX PERMITTING SERYICES PHONE/FAXNO.: SeaL I q5)~ PHONE NO.: (727) 464-3404 FAX NO.: (727) 464-5251 COMMENTS: ?\~ ~ *'Cl. A1\cLha4 w\docs\highway\ups\j c fax Murray G. Mackey Registenid Land8cape'An:hitect Certified AJborist Certified Irrigation Certified Pest Coatrol Central Pinellas Lawn Maintenance, Inc. 14745 Seminole Trail, Se.miitole, FL 33776 Ph: 727-434-1685 Fax: 727-517-0431 m PEA1. TCJAe (727) 797-9599 c G"\-', 4<\2. -0"+40'7- -::. - BARRY J. VOGEL Licensed Real Estate Broker e-mail Vogel Brkr@aol.com 504 Westborough Lane Safety Harbor, FL 34695