FL01-09-31
.
.
.
'..::.:..:.:....
0:<' (:':":
.. ...... .
.. ..... .'
... ..... .
... ...-, ..
....... ..........I.....a... rwater
,;:;::. ::::>'; .::;:;". 11,1
:Z':~~
u~
Planning Depar:t1.::!
100 South M!{rtle Avenue
Clearwater, Flciida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
OCT 1 6 2001
Ci".SE #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
o SUBMiT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
FLEXffiLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
(Revised 03/29/01)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC, a Florida limited liability CDIllpany
APPLICANT NAME:
30 Jelliff Lane, Southport, CT 06490
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
(203) 256-7788
FAX NUMBER:
(203) 256-7787
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
(Sane as al::Dve )
(Must include ALL owners)
AGENT NAME. E. D. Armstronq III, Esquire
Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A.
MAILlNG~DDRESS. P. O. Box 1368. Clearwatpr FT, ll7Sfi- nfiR
PHONE NUMBER:
(727) 461-1R1R
FAX NUMBER:
(727) 441-8617
8.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
501 Manda1ay Avenue
STREET ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein.
PARCEL NUMBER
05-29-15-99216-000-0010
Pi,RCEL SIZE.
6.164 acres m.o.l.
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSC:D USErS) AND SIZE(S). 2013 rnul ti -family units
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S) The applicant has sirrultaneously submitted an application for
(include all requested code deviations, e.g. reduction In required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.;
rezoning to HDR. This is a request for Flexible Development Approval as described in
g~E~aTUS ~~Pl~Tfc?~ }N~cit ~E't~~aT1h~~F2~tWto~~8P~~9~~)~ffiMoUSL Y APPROVED PLP-NNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents
Page 1 of 5 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
.
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk. coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is
located.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
2. The proposed development wili not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons reSiding or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
4 The proposed development IS designed to minimize traffic congestion
See Exhibit "B" attached.
5. Thearoposed development IS consistent with the community character of the Immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
6 The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, Including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
o Address the applicable fiexlbllity cnterla for the speCific land use as listed In each Zoning Dlstnct to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets
as necessary):
See Exhibit "B" attached.
Page 2 of 5 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
l
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o COF'( OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required;
o LOC/I liON MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
Including drip lines.)
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All pclfking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (mln 1 0'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o SITE DATA TABLE for eXisting, required, and proposed development, in wnttenitabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form With the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and dnveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights
Impermeable surface ratio (I.SR); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y:, X 11) and color rendenng if pOSSible;
o FOP. DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Off site elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Localion of all earth or water retaining walls and eantl berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimenSioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
BUilding and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees
Page 3 of 5 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
- . .
.
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
a LANDSCAPE PLAN:
- All existing and proposed structures;
- Names of abutting streets;
- Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
- Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
- Sight visibiiity triangles;
- Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
- Proposed and required parking spaces;
- Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
- Location, Size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
- Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
orotective measures;
- ,nterior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
- Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
- Irrigation notes.
a REDUCED LANDSCAPE' PLAN to scale (8 Y:z X 11) (color rendering if possible);
a IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
a COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Distncts) or as p
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
a BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions. colors and materials;
a REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and matenals to scale (8 Y:z X 11) (black and white and color rendenng, I
possible) as reqUired.
\. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
a Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
a Reduced slgnage proposal (8 Y:z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
a Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. T
generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-80.1 C 0
Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
1
art of a
np
fthe
K. SIGNATURE.
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made In this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
descnbed In thiS application
STATE OF FLORIDA. COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this .;J..o'rJ..- day of
~~nm b.u-, A.D 20Ql... to me and/or by
~ ' , A rmS troll~ 1II, who is personally known I~~ed
as~
/) ,
/ / /':/ // /'
c./ r::/ (/ / ,/
Signature of property owner or representative
N~t.~
M com~~~9k;:~,xp'res Jayne E Sears
g.(iM"A MY COMMISSION # DD041l66 EXPIRES
;,~,,~'~l September 2, 2005
"';f.,9'f"f,:<t.. bONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE. INC
Page 4 of 5 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
08-18-01
02:37pm
FrOm-JOHNSONIBL~
+7274418617
.
T-752
P.02/03
F-770
L. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
GREENMACK ~, LLC, a FloriCla limited liability conpany
(Names of 811 property owner.o)
1- That (I anvwe are) the owner(s) and record title nolder(~) of the following described property (address or general location):
501 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater Eeach -
Parcel #05-29-15-99216-000-0010 -
2, That t/'IIS propeny constitutes the property for wnich a reque~t for a: (descnbe request)
Flexible developrrent approval .
I
:3, That tne underSlgneo (nas/have) appointea and (does/do) appoint:
E. D. AJ:rostrong III, Esquire of Johnson, Blakely, Pope 1 Bokor, Ruppel & Bur.ns,P.A.
as (hISltheir) agent(s) to execute ,my petroons or other documents necessary to affect sucn petition;
4 That mis affidaVit has ceen executed to InQuce toe City of Clesrwater, Flonda to COnEilaer ana Clct on the above dlSscribed property;
5. Thm site visits t~ the property are.necessary 'Oy City representatives in order to process thiS application aM the owner authonzes City representatives to
vlSI! and pMtograpn the property described in thi~ application;
6. Thet (Ilwe). the underSigned aumonty, hereoy certify that the foregOing is !(Uti and correct.
~-~, me LT~
Property Owner -,;;::: PJ'v~
Bv:
Property Own!!r BanY P. Marcus , Sr. Vice President
STATE OF CX)NNECrlCUT )
COUNTY OF )
Before me the unae'zrei an officer dUlY commissloneQ by the laws of tlie State of Florlaa. on this / t3~ day of
Sept. , 00 pe~onally appeared Barry P. Marcus * wno 1'\8ving been fi~ aUly swom
DeposllS ana says that neJshe fUlly unoerslanas the contents oi the affidavit that ne/$ne signea. ,~ ;<,k-R
*as Sr. Vice President of Greenfield Cleanvater I
ILC, :Managing Member of Greernnack Clearwater, LLC Notary Fllblrc
My Commission Expires: / /3) )~
S:IPlaflE!lng DapafUflGflrlA{){)lir:::Jtion rafmSldcvr:lopmenr /sviewlflaxiblc aevelfJ{)mr:nl JJppl/car/on. doc
.y~3eO.,..7 "1 - CloQ('nc{ar P\oxj~l~ OQv'QlUt-','f'a('tt App;.li'.Q~'cf'"l
Page 5 of 5 - Flexible Development AppliciltlOn - Ci"{J' ot Clearwater
.
.
EXHIBIT "A"
Lots 1 through 9, YACHT BASIN SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, recorded
in Plat Book 25, Page 35, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
.
.
EXHIBIT "B"
Description of Request:
Flexible development approval to allow development of the proposed Catalina, as
shown on the enclosed site plan, as a Residential Infill Project, including the following:
1. North Villa at a maximum height of 130 feet (above FEMA 100 year flood
elevation).
2. Midrise Villa at a maximum height of 99 feet (above FEMA 100 year flood
elevation).
3. 17 -foot setback of building from seawall, where 18 feet is required.
4. Zero setback of structures (not including buildings) from the westerly boundary,
where 15-25 feet is required.
5. Zero setback of structures (not including buildings) from the easterly boundary,
where 10-15 feet is required.
6. Zero setback of structures (not including buildings) from the seawall, where 18
feet is required.
The applicant is requesting that the existing non-conforming density of 202 units be
treated as conforming. The proposed project is 200 units, based on a redevelopment of
the existing 202 multi-family units on the property, in compliance with Code
Section 6-109. B which states: "A structure which is nonconforming with respect to
density may be reconstructed on the same parcel with the same density provided such
reconstruction complies with all other requirements of this Community Development
Code."
General Applicability Criteria (Code Section 3-913.A):
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,
bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is
located.
The location of the property on Clearwater Bay at the northeast corner of
Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street is appropriate for the additional height
requested.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair
the value thereof.
The proposed development will not change the nature of the use as multifamily
and will decrease the density of the property to 200 units. Improvements such as
.
.
enhanced landscaping and structured parking will improve the appearance of the
area.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
It is the continuation of a residential use which should not have an effect on
health or safety of persons in the area.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The site is designed for ease of traffic flow in and out of the property, including
widened turn-arounds for emergency and utility vehicles a guard gate setback
which will allow more stacking of vehicles on the site to eliminate congestion on
Mandalay Avenue.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development will be appropriate in the north Clearwater Beach
community, which is primarily residential and resort.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects,
including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties.
The proposed development is residential so hours of operation do not apply.
With regard to the visual effect, the proposed development, which includes
additional landscaping, will improve the appearance of the neighborhood.
Flexibility Criteria for Residential Infill Projects (Code Section 2-504.F):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for
development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from
the intensity and development standards.
The rebuilding of 200 units on the property is supported by Code Section 6-
109. B. The minimal setbacks of structures other than buildings allow for
enhancement of the site through orderly traffic flow and access to facilities, and
allow the project to meet the intent of the bulk and mass parameters set forth in
the Beach by Design Guidelines.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential
infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties.
2
.
.
The proposed development will enhance rather than reduce the value of abutting
properties because it does not represent a change in use or density, only an
improvement of the site conditions and structures. .
The existing Yacht Basin Apartments were constructed on the property over 20
years ago and there are a number of nonconformities with regard to setbacks,
parking and landscaping. The proposed development reflects the redevelopment
of the existing number of residential units with the most minimal deviations from
Code standards. The applicant proposes replatting the property from nine lots to
one lot.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the
district.
The proposed use remains multi-family residential which is a permitted use in the
HDR district.
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent
land uses.
The proposed development will be appropriate in the north Clearwater Beach
community, which is primarily residential and resort.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential
infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
The proposed development will enhance and upgrade the area. Landscaping
alone will be an enhancement. The applicant proposes planting of Medjool date
palms at 30' centers along Mandalay Avenue that will meet the City's Beach by
Design standards. There will be a tree-lined promenade along the seawall.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and
function which enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater
as a whole.
Approval of the proposed residential infill project will allow redevelopment of the
existing multi-family units in a manner which minimizes other impacts. It will
enhance and upgrade this area of north Clearwater Beach.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street
parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
3
.
.
Clearwater as a whole. Building height, may only exceed 80 feet, however,
if the parcel proposed for development fronts on Clearwater Bay or is only
separated from Clearwater Bay by a public open space.
The property is located on Clearwater Bay which supports the height of the two
villas which exceed 80 feet.
#248304 v1
4
.
, ,," i
._l:~ '~: -~\,~'~.~" i.,__~,,"
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ENGINEERS, ENVlRONMENTAUSTS. SURVEYORS & PlANNERS
MEMO
~ -,.--
1..nEII; itl(li \~-l.:';. (.....~.:..'\...
II) OCT 23 20rA 7f:J
I I
C/fy OT>.-J
PIIPr Ie WORKft ~A~~# i j i,.'
A'JiI".\,: iFtJiON
TO:
AI Carrier, P .E., City of Clearwater Stormwater
FROM:
Octavio Cabrera,P.E., Sr. ProjedManager,FDC ~
DAlE:
October 17, 2001
RE:
Catalina - OiI/W ater Separators
During the DRC meeting for the subject project you requested that we "be more creative in
how to obtain greater treatment prior to discharge to Harbour". In response to your request,
we are outlining a number of measures that we proposed be used in the final design of this
project and ask that you review and comment on whether they would meet your expectations.
Those measures are as follows:
1. For the parking garage(s), where the likelihood of oiVgrease spill is greatest and flow
rates lowest, we would propose using an oil-water separator, type PSC-350,
manufactured by P.S. International, Inc. (This was the separator used on the recently
approved Mandalay Beach Club).
2. For the outside inlets, where flow rates are high and oiVgrease low, we would propose
using The Snout, manufactured by Best Management Products, Inc. (literature
enclosed). This product used in conjunction with a sump drain for efficient oiVdebris
removal.
.
.
3. At the vault itself, we would propose use of a sand filter system. These systems have
been used by FDC at numerous locations and we have a good track record of their
effectiveness. Additionally, we know that they would be acceptable to SWFWMD.
Maintenance access, via removable grates will be detailed in our final design. (We are
enclosing sample details from a recent Pinellas Park project which utilized a similar
treatment system for your information).
The vault's filter system would outfall through a control structure, which will be
provided with a skimmer, as required by SWFWMD guidelines.
Together, the above mentioned measures would provide the City of Clearwater with the
assurance that the system incorporates the latest in stormwater treatment technology at this
sensitive waterfront location. I trust that you agree with our recommendations. Should you
have any reservations, however, please let us know so that they may be addressed in our final
design.
:es
M:\canier.doc
Enc!.
:cc
File 997-103
A(- .;;01- /~ Q clp i~/'7e ,
, i A;j! nJ/K' Ifo. ~"- 1; )1a; t-.'/F/76 Nt: if" 0J ;'l; e
/ror-6::] ('04. C ~r n .. S:e-r-d -;:;- / k / /\e~
5.r I6cC" clcaM,(jJ tf r:-G~t'(e 7.;;" <c'" ct ';:I<or;,
~s 4-b...-lcP SI\(;.J'feJ )-I\-.J~ b. (1Ie-.t'd 7Ita-f
df~CV<:;''S(c,.,-, (.J..,l dC>'H"!o~t>.~ C it ?r.ou-- ;Ae COOn
C(S'~"-'( r<I'~r"f?A.o / /'L-lCl.ch ~",(1n(.~.
U/~ 1- c/o JOC-J 7X~f.. ? <2
'~,1
Page 2
. .
Best Management Products, Inc.
www.bestmp.com. .~' "..
Products for a Better Environment
The SNOUTa
Stormwater Quality Improvement System
us Patent# 6126817
Oil-Water-Debris Separator for Stormwater Structures
Anti-siphon device prevents contaminents
from being drawn downstream
Attaches to structure over any type of pipe
Removable watertight access port
Stainless steel hardware used throughout
Hooded outlet cover for sump style
stormwater catch basin
Strong, light-weight plastic composite
construction is very easy to install
· Converts any sumped catch basin or distribution structure into an oil-water-debris
separator. Easy and inexpensive Best Management Practice for NPDES Phase II.
· Keeps floatables and oil from exiting catch basin.
· Flow capacity restrictors, and odor filters available.
· SNOUT system gives designers unlimited flexibility to match stormwater treatment
options with application requirements. Use our parts with your structures.
· Units come in many sizes to accomodate discharge pipes from 2" to 84" 10.
· All units are high-flow designs with little no head-losses.
· Stop up to 800/0 of free-oils, 950/0 of floatables, and 500/0 removal of TSS.
· Pipe and retention basin maintenanace substantially reduced.
Best Management Products, Inc. 53 Mt. Archer Rd. Lyme, CT 800-504-0277 S60-434-3195 fax
!
~
.
SNOUTTM Operating Principles'
FlOW
STAno
ACCESSOOVEA ORSTOAM
ANTt-8JPHON VENT
, . . .
· Stormwater enters structure through pipe or grate.
. Floatables and free oil and grease float to surface.
. Gross particles and some suspended solids sink.
. Cleaner water flows out pipe from under SNOUT.
. Flow is aided and siphoning is prevented by vent.
SIMPLE + EFFECTIVE + AFFORDABLE
Best Management Products, I_nc.
800-504-8008 · www.bestmp.com
~
CONFIGURATION DETAIL
l' PVC ANTI-SIPHON
PIPE ADAPTER
!
If~~
I
FRONT VIEW
SIDE VIEW
SNOUT OIL-WATER-DEBRIS SEPARATOR
NOTES:
1. ALL HOODS AND TRAPS FOR CATCH BASINS AND WATER QUAUlY STRUCTURES SHALL BE
AS MANUFACTURED BY:
BEST MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS, INC.
53 Mr. ARCHER RD.
LYME, CT 06371
(860) 434-02n, (860) 434-3195 FAX
TOLL FREE: (BOO) 504-8008 OR (888) 354-7585
WEB SITE: www.bestmp.com
ORPRE~PPROVEDEQUAL
2. ALL HOODS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF A GLASS REINFORCED RESIN COMPOSITE WITH
ISO GEL COAT EXTERIOR FINISH WITH A MINIMUM 0.125' LAMINATE THICKNESS.
3. ALL HOODS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A WATERTIGHT ACCESS PORT, A MOUNTING FLANGE,
AND AN ANTI-5IPHON VENT AS DRAWN. (SEE CONFIGURATION DETAIL)
4. THE SIZE AND POSITION OF THE HOOD SHALL BE DETERMINED BY OUTLET PIPE SIZE AS
PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION.
5. THE BOTTOM OF THE HOOD SHALL EXTEND DOWNWARD A DISTANCE EQUAL TO 1/2 THE
OUTLET PIPE DIAMETER WITH A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 6" FOR PIPES <12" 1.0.
6. THE ANTI-SIPHON VENT SHALL EXTEND ABOVE HOOD BY MINIMUM OF 3' AND A MAXIMUM OF
24' ACCORDING TO STRUCTURE CONFIGURATION.
7. THE SURFACE OF THE STRUCTURE WHERE THE HOOD IS MOUNTED SHALL BE FINISHED
SMOOTH AND FREE OF LOOSE MATERIAL.
S. THE HOOD SHALL BE SECURELY ATTACHED TO STRUCTURE WALL WITH 31S'STAlNLESS
STEEL BOLTS AND OIL-RESISTANT GASKET AS SUPPLIED BY MANUFACTURER. (SEE
INSTALLATION DETAIL)
9. INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH MANUFACTURER SUPPLIED
INSTALLATION KIT.
INSTALLATION KIT SHALL INCLUDE:
A. INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
B. PVC ANTI-SIPHON VENT PIPE AND ADAPTER
C. OIL-RESISTANT CRUSHED CELL FOAM GASKET WITH PSA BACKING
D. 31S' STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS
E. ANCHOR SHIELDS
US Patenl#6126817
TYPICAL INSTALLATION
>t'
. .
. :~4.
. :4
ANTI-SIPHON DEVICE , :
SNOUT
OIL-DEBRIS
HOOD
OIL AND DEBRIS
~ ," .
, .'
1&
1f: .
. ~ .;
<." ..
.'
.4. .."
SEE NOTE" .
"'. ~.
<,
...,
"
*NOTE- SUMP DEPTH OF 36" MIN. FOR < OR= 12" DlAM.
OUTLET. FOR OUTLETS >OR;-j5". DEPTH = 2.5-3X DIAM.
INSTALLATION DETAIL
DETAlLB
FOAMGASKETWI D
PSA BACKING--
(TRIM TO LENGTH)
""""" W"""-T = I
(SEE DETAIL A)
INSTALLATION NOTE:
POSITION HOOD SUCH THAT
BOTTOM FLANGE IS A
DISTANCE OF 112 OUTLET
PIPE DIAMETER (MIN.)
BELOW THE PIPE INVERT.
MINUMUM DISTANCE FOR
PIPES < 12" I.D. IS 6',
-.-
112 D
-L-
DETAIL A
~~
. < )
DRILLED ANCHOR
HOLE SHIELD STAINLESS
BOLT
EXPANSION CONE
(NARROW END OLIT)
HOOD SPECIFICATION FOR
CATCH BASINS AND
WATER QUALITY STRUCTURES
DESCRIPTION
OIL- DEBRIS HOOD
SPECIFICATION AND
INSTALLATION
(TYPICAL)
DATE
SCALE
09/08/00
NONE
~
DRAWING NUMBER
09-0800
,.
,l.
~s
.,. (I)
....
~:
~
~
0r-
e>>
~
or-
II
lC)
.;'
:I:
Cl
e
~
l.IJ
is
~~Z
~ ~ ~ ~
>. ~ ffi oi cd
~ i;~ ~ ~
~ ~~~
~ ~t5~
~
~Q'
~z
l.IJ~
~'"
g~
It
(0
I
;r
~
:J
~
Cl
W
(/')
o
a.
o
0:::
a.
....
....
~
It
(0
I
or-
It
o
I
N
It
o
I
or-
" ',"'
o '1"
'''1
; ,
f,
~~
:J3
~~
'<
~
ffi~ ~
B~
~
or-
~
w
~
() ~
- Q'
~ I~
I/;
~ ~ro
G: ~~
jl
~t5~
g~~
F15~
a:: ~. 0
l.IJ ('II
a. .
I.l.
C 0
~~~
(S~~
::Jz~
in:J"
8~1!;!
J:I~
~~~
~-tb
=Im
~~~
2U5~
p:;~....
!J~C
G:il:i~
-.J
~
Q
Z.
~~
Q
a::
l.LJ
~
i:i:
w
...JO:::
O~
O:::C,)
I-:J
~~
C,)(/')
~ .,
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P .A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
E D. ARMSTRONG III
JOHN T. BLAKEL Y
BRUCE H. BOKOR
GUY M. BURNS
JONATIfAN S. COLEMAN
MICHAEL T CRONIN
ROBERT M. DAISLEY
ELIZABETH I DANIELS
BECK Y FERRELL-ANTON
MARION HALE
SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ
FRANKR JAKES
TIMOTHY A JOHNSON, JR
SHARON E KRICK
ROGER A LARSON
JOHN R LAWSON, JR.
TRACY E LEDUC
MICHAEL G. LITTLE
MICHAEL C. MARKHAM
STEPHANIE T MARQUARDT
ZACHARY D. MESSA
AR "CHARLIE"' NEAL
F. WALLACE POPE, JR.
ROBERT V. POTTER, JR.
AUDREY B. RAUCHW A Y
DONALD P REED
DARRYL R RICHARDS
PETER A RIVELLINI
DENNIS G. RUPPEL*
CHARLES A SAMARKOS
PHILIP M. SHASTEEN
JOAN M. VECCHIOLI
STEVEN H. WEINBERGER
AMBER F WILLIAMS
JULIUS I ZSCHAU
.OF COUNSEL
PLEASE REPL Y TO CLEARWATER
FILENO. 41913.103126
October 15, 2001
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Ms. Lisa Fierce
Development Review Manager
Planning & Development Services
City of Clearwater
Municipal Services Building
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: Application by Greenmack Clearwater, LLC
for Flexible Development Approval - 501 Mandalay Avenue
Dear Lisa:
Enclosed are 15 sets of each of the following in connection with the referenced
application:
1. Revised Flexible Development Application;
2. Location Map;
3. Preliminary Site Plan;
4. BoundarylTree Survey;
5. Preliminary Plat;
6. Master Drainage Plan;
~_.-,
7. Traffic Assessment;
WlCT."1'~6 2001
CLEARWATER OFF!CE
QII CHESTNUf STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 1368
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-1368
TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818
TELECOPIER (727) 462-0365
IF ~!19 E
~ 'o{=oq/31
'tPA OFFICE
100 NORTH TAMPA STREET
SUITE 1800
POST OFFICE BOX 11 00
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1100
TELEPHONE (8\3) 225-2500
TELECOPIER (813) 223-7118
,.
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Ms. Lisa Fierce
Development Review Manager
October 15, 2001
Page 2
8. Pervious Area Exhibit;
9. Architectural Plans; and
10. Preliminary Landscape Plans.
Once you have an opportunity to review the enclosed documents, please call my
legal assistant, Jayne Sears, or me if you require any additional items.
Very truly yours,
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR,
RU~:<,/ BU.R~S, P.A.
~ ,J ,. /? ~_c-
?~~.- . - ~~-~
E. D. Armstrong III
EDAljs
encls.
cc: Mr. David A. Mack
Mr. Greg DeStefano (w/encls.)
#251174 v1
DCl
1 8 2007
OCT 1 6 2001
tI>
C
Z
c>
~-
1 .
CLEARWATER
BARBQIl
!
~.iEA8WA~E...................
. ....--'.-- -'.--., .,":"",' ..-......
.'.---- .. -,-.'
I
4
SEA
<NG,
Clearwater
Chamber
Welcome.
Center
I
I
~~ED .
-q r)\ ,Se..c.. 5'\ B ) -r 1..'\ S , R \5 E
.
.
OCT 1 6 2001
MASTER DRAINAGE
For
CA T ALINA
(fka YACHT BASIN APARTMENTS)
III
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
for
DAVID A. MACK PROPERTIES, LLC
30 JELLIFF LANE
SOUTHPORT CONNECTICUT 06490
PHONE (203) 256-7788
f~n ~
~~~1M
~~ /)/
OCTOBER 2001
By FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. EB# 742]
2639 MCCORMICK DRIVE
CLEARWATER, FL 33759
CCli:iiZv 0?!/v
OCT A VIO CABRERA} PE #]4663
,'C':/lSj t!
I) a te
.
.
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE DATA
CATALINA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. LOCATION MAP
2. DESIGN DATA
3. SIDE DRAIN FILTER ORA WDOWN ANALYSIS OJ
A. DESIGN SUMMARY
B. SPREADSHEET
4. SIDE DRAIN FILTER ORA WDOWN ANALYSIS 02
A. DESIGN SUMMARY
B. SPREADSHEET
5. PARTIAL SITE PLAN
i
:LEARWAltER
",,'
(
i.
~
I
eLl:' ..\ R W ATE R
HA REOR
i
::i'
;po
-<
I
I
t/)
,...
;po
z
CJ
4
V'E
5
iI,'
/.;} i
,/1
---L-
./
NORTH SHe
'.-1
cPA
/
'"r'.:1
"'::J
;//1
__!.~/ l
/4'(j
/i;
EN~~UR~
1"'/ EiH,
i):,
~:I PAl
!?$/ PALM
/f# B L}
/&! SPR ING J!-
f'" CEDH
9 1m .---r-
f.~1 M~Jna ~
';Boat L~!N/f
jRamp'1 ~
Ii':! !HDRIDG
I
1<1
I,':
1;)1
"1
i :;;1
--L::l
C~p
~/jl( If?
.4 7'j;;
I~,,-
\ ~
PUhlir\ ~~~, 17
fl..ach \ ~~~
. -...,
Key Park
i/
OR :
()A ~.\ (~), (
PATH (
C~\"L\N~
Loc~\\()~ MP-..f>
S e..c.. 5~ ~ ) \ 1-~ S , R \ S E
YACHT BASIN
.
.
10/12/01
Design Data -
Total Area = 6.165 acres
For underground vault system, must treat the first W' of runoff
6.165 ac. x
43560 s.f.
ac
x
0.75 in. x
f.t.
12 in.
16781 of
design to 17000 cf
SWFWMD criteria requires that the system draw down within 72 hours (36 hours if a safety factor of 2
is used).
City of Clearwater criteria requires that the system draw down within 24 hours.
Design for the stricter criteria (City of Clearwater) of24 hours.
Executive Summary -
The criteria for this project calls for treatment only (no attenuation, due to the project location) since
discharge would be to outstanding Florida Waters and the proposed treatment method is filtration. The
requirement is for treatment of the first 3/4" ofrunoff(150% of 1/2" due to O.F.W. discharge).
Two alternate analysis have been run, depending on the design high water to be used for final design.
The last sheet of this report shows that the retention area provided in the plan is adequate for either
alternate.
At this time no attempt has been made to balance the split of the contributing areas to match the size of
the vaults(s) at the NW and SE. Final design will ensure that the area draining to each vault is stated,
and each vault designed separately, or properly interconnected.
A design storm event exceeding the capacity of the vault system will overflow the proposed control
structure and be discharged to the Bay. The outfall pipes shall be designed to handle the anticipated
runoff from a 25-year storm event.
YACHT BASIN
.
.
10/12/01
Side Drain Filter Drawdown Analysis 01
Peak tidal influence = 2.5 ft.
therefore
to maintain OS of freeboard, the elevation of the centerline of pipe = 3.25 ft
bottom of treatment volume = 3.70'
proposed top of treatment volume = 5.00'
By using 200 If of pipe, drawdown can be achieved in 23.7 hour < 24 hours
-l
<(
1-1-
wO
I-
0::
1-0
< Z
.5
<.90
>-l
<(LL
5<(
O~
-l II
LLO
<(0::
WW
o::~
<(ll:
~
C/)
>-
-l
<(
Z
<(
Z
5
o
o
5
<(
0::
o
0::
W
I-
-l
LL
Z
~
0::
o
I
W
o
C/)
.0
0<(
>-0::
I <.9
Cl
>
tll
-l
X
tll
E
-l
c
'E
-l
0::
>0
< Z
-l
<(
I-
>~
fJ)
E
Q.
<(
c
'en
tll
co
1::
<.)
tll
>-
tll
~
<(
Z
-l
<(
I-
<(
o
0::
o
..cZ
< -
-l
<(
I-
..cO
I-
o
>
W<.9
Z
.
x x x x x x x x x x
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
oXOX~XMX~X~X~XOXMX~XM
X X X X X X X~X~X~XN
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x x
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
XoX~X~X~X~XNXNXMX~XIDX
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X x
Ix x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
X~X~XmXNXMXMX~X~XNX~X
xmXMX~XIDX~XIDxmXMXox~X
X~X~x~x~XqX~XIDX~X~XNX
X~X~X~X~X~X X X X X'X
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~X~X~X~XMXMXNXoX~XmX~
MXIDXOX~X~X~X~X~XIDXMXM
~X~XIDXMX~XmX~XIDX~XMXN
NX~X~X~X~X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~XqXq
OX~X~XNXIDXOX~X~XNXIDXO
~XNxmX~X~XNxmXIDx~x~xm
~X~XMXMXMXMXNXNXNXNX~
X X X X X x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x
x x X x x x x x x x
oXoXoXoXoXoXoXoXoXoXo
~XoX~XoX~XoX~XoX~XoX~
~X~X~X~X~X~X~XNX~XmXN
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
OXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO
X x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x
oxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxo
~xqxqxqxqxqx~xqx~x~xq
NXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x
oxoxoXOXoxoxoxoxoxoxo
qxqxqxqx~xqx~xqxqxqxq
NXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x
oXoXoXoXoXoXoxoxoxoxo
qxqxqxqx~x~x~xqxqxqxq
NXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x X x x
XOXOXO~OXOXOXOXOXOXOX
XoXoXo oXoXoXoXoXoXoX
X~X~X~ ~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x X
~~~~M~M~N~N~N~~~~~O~O
OXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOX
qx~x~x~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
~X~XMX~XOX~XIDX~XMX~X
~X~X~X~X~X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x X
XMXMXMXMXMXMXMXMXMXMX
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoX
X x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x X' x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x
~XNXmXIDXMXoX~X~X~X~X~
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
~X~X~X~X~X~xoxoxoxoXo
X x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x
oX~X~X~X~X~XNxmXIDXMXo
~X~X~X~X~X~x~xqx~x~x~
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~XMXMXM
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
.
~
E
CT
Q)
0::
en
o
~
....
Q)
co
~
tll
Q)
<3
-
o
c
<3
x
o C/)
N 0::
~ :J
W II ~
:2: tll
~:J W ~ ~
W-lo..tll
:2:0o::~ I~
:J>LLiil I-Z
51-z0 ~ (95
x Zo
>WWo L110
I-:2:Z.... ~
ZI-:J ~ Z5
W<(O::<( -<(
:2:WW ~o::
1-0::1- 00
<(I-Z
WLLW--:-~ 0:::2:
0:: 0 0 ';;; ....; ~~n:!
I-:2:LL........~ zC/)
~~~~~ ;~
o..l-OOZ 0::
oOF@@ ~o
t:. !:e- <( <( <( x 5 LL
5-lGJWW'S tll_ OW
-l5-l0::0::EEs.::w~
OZW<(<(-l-l: 0::1-
o~~OONNNO~
oc-;N~~ ~o,
l!:i c-;gg l!:iN~
YACHT BASIN
.
.
Side Drain Filter Drawdown Analysis 02
Peak tidal influence = 2.5 ft
therefore
to maintain 0.5' of freeboard, the elevation of the centerline of pipe = 3.25ft
bottom of treatment volume = 3.70'
proposed top of treatment volume = 6.00'
By using 130 If of pipe, drawdown can be achieved in 23.9 hours < 24 hours.
R:\yacht basin apartments. doc
10/12/01
...J
<{
1-1-
wO
I-
0::
1-0
< ~
.s
(90
>...J
<{LL
s<{
0:;2
...J II
LLa
<{o::
WW
o::~
<{u:
C/)
C/)
>-
...J
<{
Z
<{
Z
S
o
o
S
<{
0::
o
0::
W
I-
...J
LL
Z
~
0::
o
I
W
o
C/)
.0
O<{
>-0::
I(9
OJ
>
ltl
...J
X
ltl
E
...J
c
oE
...J
0::
>0
< Z
...J
<{
I-
>0
I-
00
E
C5.. ci
<{ 0
.f:: .s::.z
< -
00
ltl
CD
E ...J
U <{
ltl
>- I-
ltl .s::.0
~ I-
<{
Z 0
...J
<{ >
~ w~
0
.
x x x x x x x x x x
oXmXMX~X~X~XOXNXMxoxm
oXoX~XNX~x~x0XroX~X0x~
x x x x x x X X~X~XN
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x x
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
XoXoXoX~X~X~XNXMX~X~X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x x
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
X~XmX~XoXNXMXoX~X~XmX
x~xmx~xrox~x~xrox~xmx~x
xqx~X~X~X~X~X~X~XMXNX
XNXNXNX~X~X~X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
roX~XOX~XNXMXNXroXNXNXO
~xrox~x~xoxroxox~x~xrox~
~XmXNXroX~X~XmXmX~XNX~
MXNXNX~X~X~X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
NXNXNXNXNXMXMXMXMXMXM
NxmxmXMxoX~X~X~XroX~XN
~XMXMXMXMXNXNXNX~X~X~
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
o~o~o~o~o~o~o~o~o~o~o
~XoX~XoX~XoX~XoX~XoX~
~XmX~XMX~XoXroX~X~X~XN
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
~X~X~X~XoXoXoXoXoXoXo
x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x
OXOxoxoxoxoXOXOXOXoxo
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
NXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x
oXoXoXoXoXoXoXoXoXoXo
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
NXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x
oXoXoXoXoXoXoXoXoXOXo
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
NXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x X
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
x~X~X~X~X~X~x~x~X~x~X
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x X
N~~~o~ro~~~m~~~~~N~~~O
~XoXmX~XmX~X~XMXNX~X
~x~x~xqx~x~x~X~X~X~X
~X~XMX~XoXroXmX~XMX~X
~X~X~X~X~X X X X X X
X X X X x X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x X
XMXMXMXMXMXMXMXMXMXMX
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoX
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x x
~XNxmxmXMXox~X~X~XroX~
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
NXNXNXNX~X~X~X~XoxoXo
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X x X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x
oX~X~X~XOOX~XNXmxmXMXo
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
mX~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~XMXM
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
.
E
c:r
Q)
0::
....
Q)
1il
~
ltl
~
o
-
o
C
U
N
m
x
b
N
T""
(J)
0::
=>
o
I
~
N
V
iLl II
::'2 ltl
~=> W ~
W...Jn.ltl Z
::'20a:=: IS
=>>LL~ 1-0
c)l-zO>: (90
x Z>
>ww 0 W...JC2>
I-::'2Z....
Zl-:J 2i: z_O
W<{o::
::'2WW<{ <{O
I- 0:: I- 00:: I-
<{I-Z
WLLW---:-~ 0::::'2
0::00';;;....; WW
I-::'2LL~~ ~t;
~~~~~ =>>-
n.I-OOZ 0C/)
00- wO::
I-CDI;;@)@) ~~
~~.....<{<{ x =>
S...J[ijWWof:: ltl. OW
...JS...Jo::o::EE~w~
OZW<{<{...J...J= 0::1-
o~~OONNNOm
O~N~~ ~M 0
o ~;::;:: u)~~
.
TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT .
FOR
CATALINA
OCT 1 6 2001
I. INTRODUCTION
This traffic assessment was prepared to comply with Section 4-801 of the City of Clearwater
Community Development Code.
II.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
~'...: .. '''.' ~~. ,...Ql.
~:;" L .:~
---.... ..~
-' L-J(
According to the Pinellas County MPO 2001 Level of Service Report Mandalay Avenue carries 14,410
AADT (Annual Average Daily Traffic). Information taken from the Traffic Analysis/Preliminary
Engineering Report for Mandalay A venue/Papaya Street/San Marco Street Reconstruction indicates
Mandalay A venue carries 942 vehicles during the PM peak hour which represents LOS C conditions on
a four-lane undivided roadway. That same report stated completion of the Mandalay Beach Club
Condominium would add 656 daily trips of which 56 would occur during the PM peak hour, and LOS C
conditions would be maintained.
III. FUTURE CONDITIONS
The proposed Catalina development will include 200 condominium units on the northeast comer of
Mandalay A venue/Baymont Street. Trip generation estimates were made using ITE Trip Generation, 6th
Edition Land Use Code 232 (High-Rise Residential Condominiumffownhouse). Catalina would
generate 836 daily trips of which 68 would occur during the AM peak hour (13 entering/55 exiting) and
76 would occur during the PM peak hour (46 entering/30 exiting). To be conservative, it was assumed
all traffic would use Mandalay A venue, although Poinsettia A venue is a parallel alternative. A trip
generation comparison is shown below.
: PM PeakH6ur
Existing Trip Generation (202 Apts) 1339 125
Proposed Trip Generation (200 Condos) 836 76
This shows a decrease in traffic generation from the site will result
With the demolition of the existing apartments and Catalina project traffic included, Mandalay A venue
would continue to operate at LOS C during the PM peak hour carrying 949 vehicles and virtually no
increase over existing traffic. Catalina traffic represents only 3.56% of the LOS D peak hour capacity as
shown below.
PM Peak HQur
Existing Traffic 14,410 942
Demolition Yacht Basin A ts. (-1,339) (-125)
Mandalay Beach Club 656 56
Catalina 836 76
Total 14,563 949
LOS D Capacity 23,775 2,160
Catalina % LOS D 3.55% 3.56%
*Existing traffic includes traffic from Yacht Basin Apartments
;f?Uj#~
Octavio Cabrera
IV. CONCLUSION
OCT 1 5 2001
FL P.E. No. 14663
Development of the Catalina project would not result in unacceptable levels of service on Mandalay
Avenue. Project traffic would comprise 3.56% of the LOS D "capacity" on Mandalay Avenue.
R:\traffic assessment Catalina.doc
(f)C
01-
...J(f)
III III
i: III
ell III
~o
en
o
...J
g"C
._ Cl)
- Cl)
o 0-
~(f)
>
(f)
~
~.3
0; '"
e:
0>
u;1-
'"
l:
<(I-
'"
(f) ~~~
.... 12 c..
J: II.. II.. U)
u: "0 ~
~ ~ 5
I-
.,
"C -;,e. ~ :
,g 11.
...
Cl)
~
III '5' OJ ~
ell <( U) u..
~
~
-
Cl
c:
ell
...J
c:
ell
Cl)
~
ell
al
-
ell
ell
...
...
(f)
c:
o
o
:z
o
ell
(f)
c
E~
g'--'
en
~-g
E '"
Ol 0.
"'U)
en
C
> '"
~ E
I-i=
u
"3
N
.... ,...
.... 10
cot 0
....
'"
U
u
C,
C <(
~
Z N
u..
:!:
11.
o
~ 10
N
O!
.c 8
... "'!.
:J
o
>
o
o
.,
.,
10
o
E
:.::
.... 0;
IX) ~
ci
I-
o
~
o
CD ;;
:s 0
ii: 8
"C 0
c: ::>
III ...
>.
;:
III
>.
o
0::
o
~
e
II..
~ 2
>. ~
III ii:
iii .s
"C >.
r:: 3:
III ~
~ 0
It:
<
:2
o
t-. 0
o ,...
~ ~
t
o
M
o
CD
N
o
'"'.
b
N
"l
o
N
~
C U)
'"'
b
Z '"'
.,
o
~ 10
N
O!
o
-e :6.
:J
~
o
.,
:8
E 0
~
.... '"
~ ~
o
o
:;
t
o
U)
Z
z ~
~ Z
~
...
en
"C ;;
; 0
ell 8
8:0
::>
:E N
c..
-
o
en
It)
0::
(f)
N
Z
>
<(
.J::.
a;
U) s
8-
iii ,g.
~ :c
III ~
... 0
III 0>
~ ~
U)
<
M '"'
.... ~
M
o
CD
~
lD
b
N
'"'
o
N
~
C U)
'"'
b
Z '"'
lD
o
~ 10
N
O!
.c g
... .,.
:J
o
o
E
.... 0;
~ ~
o
o
~
III ~
.:.:: 0
III
...J g
"C 0
c:
III ~
"C
0::
ell
c:
ell
ell
~
"C >
O!: ~
c: "'"
ell ~
.s
::l '"
~ It:
o '"
~ ~
:.::
<
o
It) 0
N 10
It) ~
~
~
10
lD
CD lD
~ ~ ~ M
~ E E '"
.~ ~ re
",,,,N
Q) Q)
~.~~
e: e: 0>
g.2>>d
'" en
~ ~ ...
~~~
~~N
o 0
"''''
xxb
~ ~ ~
:;=
.~ ~ 0
",,,,N
Q) Q)
e: e: .
C ~~<(
o 0
UU...
N
o
Q)
N
b
N
'"'
o
N
~
'"'
~b~
Z ... 10 ...
lD
~
NNN
~ ~ ~
000
~ 101Ofl)
NNN
~~~
.c~~~
.... ~ co.. GO..
:J.
o
101Ofl)
.........
lDlDlD
NNN
N
.,
lD
10
o
.,.,.,
lDlDlD
101Ofl)
ddd
E
0;;;;;0;
C1 ~~~
N
o
.,.,.,
~~~
'li~;o
o
U)
Z
~~~
o
IX)
It)
0::
(f)
"C
c:
III
~.
'Q.
(f)
E
o
...
-
o
al
"C ~
0:: iii "5
~ <<>!2.0
... :2 CD co
o ~:8 10
o - It: It:
al aU)~
C:. U 0-
_Ill 0;; ~
=~-.:
::l'5.~8
~U)~~
o 15e:~
~ 'i5 is It:
CDUU)
>>>
00
...,...'"
O...~
00
000
000
ddd
000
lDlDlD
...... 000
en ~ ~ 1ri
.... N
<(
u.
lD
.
.
.
o
IX)
cot
M
10,",
NlD
~~
~g
ON
ri M"
bb
Nfl)
U':!~
~ b
... fl)
C <( <(
... ...
~~
z ......
~~
00
~ 10 fl)
NN
~~
.c ~ ~
... "'!. "'!.
:J
NN
:;:;
MM
N
.,.,
:818
dd
E
No;o;
N ~ ~
N
NN
00
q;j fD"
lDlD
~~
N
...~~
(f) 0 ~
c:
iii
~
"C
c:
III
o
IX)
It)
0::
(f)
00
00
00
00
lDlD
"C
0::
;; e- Ui
o .!! e:
o ill 0;
al ~::E
I N 0
C:~e.
.! It: Q)
"SUe:
"'" .s!:!:!.
.c;ON
U :g ~
~ It: It:
U)U
<<
O~
CD ,';I; 10
.... N N
u..oo
u.. u..
u.
10,",
10",
::~
.
.
.
~~~
~~::
"'.,
r:O~
,",lD
N
MM~
"":M~
~01O
~N~
en
CD
~
M
~~;c
~.....--
"'0>0>
000
NNN
MMM
bbb
fl)1Ofl)
~~~
000
NNN
C<(<(<(
... ... ...
~OO
Z .........
~~~
000
~ 10 '" fl)
NNN
~~O-!
.c ~~~
... <<!.~<<!.
:J ~ ~
'"'...'"
N.,.,
10,...,...
M (J'f M
N
.,.,.,
""lD
1Ofl)fl)
ddd
E
co 0;0;(>>
o ~ ~ ~
N
NlDN
""NN
~.,,",
CNM
.,,...,...
~~~
o
-
.
::!::
::l
C)
-
"N.,
"'~...
000
CD
0::
VJ
"C
c:
III
888
ood
000
lDlDlD
en
.5
III
~
"C
0:: :6 Ui
;;E~.s
o u o..!.
o 8 0 "3
al U - t:l
. - c-
c:~~2
ell ~"5 It:
U)",I/)
::l .s 8 B
~ UioUi
o e: 0> ;t
~o;~e
::EI/)O
<<<
000
t-. :8 In 18
..- NNN
u...u U
'"
...... ~
N N
N
N 0
o.ri
10
o ~
~ 10
"!,.o
....
C <(
~
,z '"'
o
~ 10
N
O!
.c ~
... "'!.
:J
N
.,
18
o
E
.... 0;
Q) ~
ci
~ ~
'Q.
(f)
E
o
... 10
... '"'
o 0
al 0
"C g
c:
llS 0
~ ...
'Q.
VJ
~
~
o
Z
"C
0::0.
~ I/)
... E
o 0
o 'l5
al CD
I B
c: '"
Cl) ~
::l '"
~~
o 10
~ ~
U
<
o
CD :!
al
M
~ e:
ci Q)
N a,
Q)
Vl
'"
Q)
.~.
0;
e:
Ol
'0;
'"'
N
N
~
~
....
Na E
'"
e
0;
e:
;t
o
"C
X
Q)
e:
=
.~
'"
<<>
e:
C ~
8
b
0>
...
b
...
b
Z 10
N
o
~ 10
N
O!
.c ~
... "'.
:J
,...
~
~
N
E
en 0;
M ~
...t
N
"'!.
N
<D
'"
lD
~ o.
'Q.IO
VJ ~
E
o
::: 0
o
al
"C ~
c: 0
III 0
ai g
ell 0
~ ...
...J
c:
o
0-
...
llS
I-
"C
0:: 0.
I/)
;; E
o g
o ~
Oil .s
c: to
.! ~
::l to
~~
o fl)
~ ~
U
<
o
N
It) ;!
N
o
N
.,
N
.,
.,
10
o
C)
CO
M
o
CD
.
~
't:J
c:
CD
&
~
C
Qj
r.
<5
Q)
;;;
'?
e:
o
,. Z
'3 II
"'0
a; en
J"Z
f-- ~-
0.2-
o '"
u.::E
E.!!
0'"
~ii5
c C:
<<> 0
QjZ
:t:: II
:0--
'"
"'::E
21/)
~Z
en .
Q)"C
- '"
go..
'" ::l
o ~
. e:
'c
0;::>
e: '"
o e:
:= (Q
c.,
~ 0
w~
II II
lD::>
.,;N
:0-0
~~
> 0.
'" E
... Q)
"'-
:c .5
Ole:
:c::>
II '"
fl) C
.~~
:53~
~:Eii
> II ...J
Ill::> u
\T ::E >.
... .U
. ~ e:
EVl-;;
OVl-
"''''Q)
~o i
0:...:--,
A .~.~
~~~
(!!;tll.
o.QU)
~ u...2;
~~~
~-u
It II X
N~W
ci~~
o >- .
0. m '"
c:-~~
"'''''''
>~""
uu...=
-(L~
i:i. .. LL
~~z .
.... ~c:d 0
~I--O:.s
z...... ...
.,1jtf~
",m _
:011.. ClI
'" -
I-- e:U
II o.Q ~
f-u~CIl
'.~ 'U~
Ie ~.f:lJ
.!l!.!l!ac:
q.:t::;;ca
~ l~"
a 0 -- Q)
II ~ 0 ::.-
a o~::::
:i~~O
i:i<(o.cl,
o II II.......
cn-5u.>"'
."" --' _ 1:l
0::;;": <.C:
z .::::
z
~
.c
...
:J
o
E
o
C!
....
1II
.:Jt:.
o
o
0::
c:
.llS
:c
.5
"C
c:
llS
"C
0::
o
Cl
...
III
...J
.
...
~
()
~
~
...
IX)
&::
G)
~
o
llS
.c
c:
~
~
ell
~,
o
M
....
It)
.
.
/9.98 Level of Service :~'cl7cbook
Fiorida Oepartmer~1. of Transpcrtation
Table 5-4
GENERALIZ8l ANNUAL AVERAGE DAI LY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S . I
URBANIZED AREAS" -
.,
.-
ST.Q"E TWO-WAY JlRTERIALS FREEWA"/S
I.NHlERU'1B) R.OIIIl . -
nalgnallzed - Group 1 -.....n UlIbMiz" .... 0/11. 500.000 end leedftg.. or~...... 5 ..... of 1M
~ aIV' c.... bw...... deb&ctl
Lm_ ls'I el 0/ Sefy ice -
Dlvtded A B e 0 E ~ 01 Seoy iee -
2 Undiv ided 8.900 13.900 18.900 24.800 33.100 I Lan... A B e 0 E
4 Divided 21,500 35.800 50. 100 60.100 71,600 4 21.200 34.300 51.500 66.200 81,700
6 Divided 32.200 53.700 75.200 90.200 107.400 6 32. 600 52. 700 79,000 101,600 125.400
8 44.500 71.800 107,800 138.600 171,100
10 55.600 89.800 134.700 173.200 213.800
NtERU'1B) R.OIIIl 12 65 200 105 400 158100 203 200 250.900
Class I l>4-llll1o .........-___ Group 2 ______in_1I
Lm.... laY el 0/ Sefy ice laY eI 0/ Seov ice
Dlvtded Jr B e D- e- Lm.. A B e D E
2 UIIliv ided N/A 10.800 15,600 16,600 16,600 4 20.900 32.800 49,200 62.600 74.soo
4 Divided N/A 23.500 33.200 35.000 35.000 6 32.100 50.400 75.600 96.200 114.soo
8 Div ided N/A 35.800 49.900 52.500 52.500 8 43,800 68,800 103.200 - 131,300 156,300
8 Divided N/A 45.300 61.400 64.400 64,400 10 54,700 86,000 129,000 164.200 195.400
12 64,100 100.800 151,200 192.400 229. 1 00
Class II 1UlO\o4.50 ~_.........
NON-ST.Q"E RO,JOW.os
Lm.... laY eI of Sefy ice III.JOR aTY,caJNTY IItW:IWAYS
Dlvtded /Ir" B- e D E
2 UIIliv ifed N/A N/A 9,900 14,900 16,200 Lev et 0/ Serv ice -
4 Divided N/A N/A 22,900 32.500 34,300 Lm.. Jr B- e D E
6 DiY ided N/A N/A 35.500 48,900 51.700 2 Undiv ided N/A N/A 8.600 14,600 16,000 1
8 Div ided N/A N/A 44.700 60.100 63.400 4 Divided N/A N/A 19.800 31,700 33.900
6 Div ided N/A N/A 30.800 47,800 51.000
Class IU ...... __ 4.50 ._...__ ....____ poO.....,.ciCy 4u) \4850 2.3,115 2S;~oo
cen.... buIineIe diaIRCtClfUlbMiud "'0I'_5OO..GOCD OIlER SlGNAU2EllIltW:lWATS
(slgnalized intersection enalysis)
Lm.... laYeI 0/ Sefy lee Lm.. Jr B- e 0 E
Dlvtded Jr B- e 0 E 2 Undiv ided I N/A N/A 4,800 10.900 11,900 I
2 Undiv ided N/A N/A 3.300 12.100 15,800 4 Divided N/A N/A 11,800 23.800 25..400
4 DiY ided N/A N/A 7,800 27,800 33.600
6 Div ided N/A N/A 12,100 43.300 50,500
B Div ided N/A N/A 15.300 54.200 62. 100
,JOJUS11otENTS
CMllEOIIMlMOED
etasslV ...... __ 4.!50........_ __ __.........,. dly..... ...c_~____
buaanMe d.Md of............ 5DI1.ODOI
Left Turn Adlua.-t
Lm.. MedI... Bays - Fedlon
Lm.... laY eI 0/ Secvice 2 DiY ifed Yes +6'l\.
Dlvtded Jr B- e D E 2 UndiY Ided No -2OlI.
2 Undivided N/A N/A 3.700 13.800 15,300 Mull Hndly ifed YM ~
4DiYided N/A N/A 1.900 29.900 32.600 LMuli - U;;a., Ided No -2S'1.J
6 Divided N/A N/A 14,000 45,500 49.000
a DIY ided N/A N/A 17,500 56.200 60,100 ONE.WAY
. .....c...pondIng IllrIoowlIy YOI.... tndCIII-.I pee_
The Florida Depanmenl 0/ Tl3RSIlO'tation On..Way Adlu_ -
Sour~ Sy Siems Planning Office Lan... EquI-
605 Suwannee Slreet . MliI Station 19 - ~-.- F8doI'S
2 4 - .4O'l\,
Tallahassee. Aorida 323~
3 6 :4O'l\, _-
http://www.dot.state.fluslplanning 4 8 -4O'l\,
5 B .- -25'l\.
. The table does I'lOl constitute a standanl and should be used only for general planning appications. The computer models from 'OlIlich!his table is-derived
should be used , or more specjfi: pIanninq appicatlons. The lable and deriving compute< models should noc be used for cO<ridor or intersea;;.. deSogn, ~
more relined techniques exisl. Vlllues shown.", -..aI average daily volumes (based on KIOO factOB. noc peak-l~1y rati8s) for levels (}I serri:e. And .
are based on lhe 1997 Update 10 Ihe H~y Capacity Manual and Florida irati ie. JOadway, and signaizatlon data. The lable's input YJl&Je assum~ and
level 01 s81Vice criteria appeer on lIIe fclowng page. ~ -
- Cannot be achieved. -
,~ Volumes are comparable because inlersection capaciies have been reached. September 1998
-- -
~
.:
'1
- (
I
I
I
I
-.
i998 Level 01 Se.rvicslia/7dbook
Flori<:!a Department of Transportation
Table 5..7
.
Unslgnallzed
Lanesl
DIvided
2 Undivided
4 Divided
6 Divided
A
810
1,950
2.930
STJQ'E TWO-WAY ./ItTERIILS
lJNHlElFI./PJa) F\.OW
level 01. Service
S C
1,270 1,720
3,260 4,560
4,890 6.840
Class ~ />G.OOD1_oi9wIlzood__pw_.
IN'IEIVllPtm F\.OW
Lanesl
Dlvlded
2 Undiv ided
4 Divided
6 DIv ided
8 Divided
Jr*
NlA
NlA
NlA
NlA
S
1,000
2. 190
3,330.
4.210
level 01 Service
C
1,450
3,000
4,640
5.710
Class U C2JlO"'..'SO....~od__pwllli..)
Lanesl
DIvided
2 Undivided
4 Divided
6 Divided
8 DIv ided
Class UI
Jr*
NlA
NlA
NlA
N/A
S-
NlA
NlA
NlA
N/A
level 01 Service
C
920
2. 130
3,3JO
4.160
D-
1,550
3,260
4,890
5,990
D
1,390
3,020
4,550
5.590
D
2.260
5,470
8.210
E"".
1,550
3,260
4,890
5,990
E
1,500
3,190
4,810
5.900
t- _...so olgnd....__ PWmile _ _..._ pilMly coy
- -"""''*''''_od__IiOO.oool
Lanes!
DIvided
2 Undivided
4 Divided
6 Divided
8 Divided
Jr*
NlA
NlA
N/A
N/A
S-
NlA
NlA
NlA
N/A
lev el 01 Serv ice
C
310
720
1,120
1.410
D
1,110
2.560
3,960
4.990
E
1,450
3,090
4,650
5.710
Class IV t::::::'':'~~--==~~~--plilMlycoyc_
Lanes!
DIvided
2 Undivided
4 Divided
6 Div ided
8 Div ided
Jr*
N1A
NlA
NlA
N/A
S-
.N/A
NlA
NlA
NlA
lev el 01 Serv ice
C
340
820
1,290
1.610
The FIofida Department 01 Transportation
- Source: _ Systems Planning OIfice
605 Suwannee Street - M!iI Slation 19
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450
D
1,270
2.750
4,190
5.170
E
1,410
2.990
4,510
5.530
E
3.010
6,510
9.770
Lanes
4
6
8
10
12
FREEWAYS
fwwiNn Ulblnized.... Glt'er soo.ooo IItQ leadng 10 G' passing within 5 mi,,, of 1h.
Dli"*Y cily __ __ dslrictl
A
1,900
2.900
3,900
4,900
5.700
lev el 01 $erv ice
C -
4,500
7,000
9,500
11,900
13. 900
o
5,800
8,900
12.200
15,200
17.900
o
5,800
8,900
12. 100
15, 100
17.700
D
l,J30
2,880
4.350
2./~
D
!190
2, 170
AdJustment
Fa:tors
~
-20%
-5%
-25%J
E
7,200
11,000
15,100
18,800
22, 1 00
E
6.900
10.500
14,400
18,000
21.100
E
1,41>0
3,000
4.640
2,"310
E
1,090
2.310
One-Way AdJustment
Lanes T~ Fa:tors
2 4 -40%
3 6 -40%
4 8 -40%
http://_.OOt.state.f1.uslpfaming 5 8 -25%
. Th8 table does not constitute a standard and should be used only lor general plaming appfications. The computer models lrom .....ich lIlis labIe is derived
should be used I ~ more spec:i1 ic plannilg appflCations. The table and deriv ing computer models should not be used lor corridor or intersection design, where
more relinedtec:hRques exist Values shown are ~ hourly maximum volumes lor levels 01 service, and ate based on the 1997 Updata to the Highway
Capacity MaroaI and F10rida tratlic;. roadway, and signaJi2ation data. To convert to annual average daily lraIlic: volumes, these volumes must be divided by
an appropriate Kl00 I actor (not peak-lo-daily ratio). The table's input value assumptions and level 01 service criteria appear on the lollowing page.
.. Cannot be achieved.
... Volumes ate comparable because intersection c:apac:jtles hav 9 been reached.
.:
Group 1
S
3,000
4,600
6.3)0
7.900
9.3JO
Group 2 ----_..Oll"GlaoGll
Un..
4
6
8
10
12
Un..
2 Undivided I
4 Divided
6 Divided
4w;
Unes
2 Undiv ided I
4 Div ided
Lanes
2
2
MJltI
l MJltI
~I
A
1,900
3.000
4,000
5,000
5.900
level 01 Service
C
4,500
7.000
9.500
11,900
13.900
B
3,000
4,600
6,3)0
7,900
9.3)0
NQN..STRE ROADWAYS
IolAJQI DTY..caJHTY In\DWA YS
Jr*
lev eI 01 Service
C
100
1,810
2.900
13.50
ODER SIGNAU2EO IlO\OWAVS
(signalaed Intersec:llon lRIIysisl
B" C
NIP ~
NIP 1.060
tr
NlA
NlA
N/A
B-
NlA
NlA
N/A
NIP
NIP
ADJUSlMENTs
lllVIOel:tI\.tol)ED
......~--_...._~
Median
Divided
Undiv ided
Undiv ided
Undiv ided
Left Turn
Says
Yes
No
Yes
No
ONE-WAY
CoI...~__ "".nwindcalod-'!
September 1998
.
Apartment
(220)
.
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday
Number of Studies: 80
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 211
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate
6.63
Range of Rates
2.00 - 11.81
Standard Deviation
2.98
Data Plot and Equation
7,000
6,000
,
,
,
,
,
,
. . . . . . . . . "
- . - - - . - ,- . . . - - - -.- - - . - - . ',- - . . . . - ",' - - . - . - -,' . - . . . . -, - . . - - - - -, - . . - - - - -, - . . - - -,,-,~- - . . .
,
,
,
, ,
,
"
. , . . . . . ............"~
ooooooo.- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'- 0 0 0 o. - .,00000000,00 - 0000 ':0 0 0 00000:0000.. 'l~>o,~o 0"
///:
x "
o 0 0 0 . . . , . 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:0 0 0 0 . 0 ~ 0: 0 0 0 ~~,o>~~ 0 0 .. 0 0' 0 0 0 . . . . ~ . 0 0 0 0 . . : 0 0 0 0 0 . 0
: x x' ,
, X ",~/
. . . ."
. . . . . - - ~ - . . - . . - ,- . - - - - . . ,- . . - - . - -:' -,,~;...... -, - - - - . . - -. - - . . . . - .. . - . . - . - .. . - - - - . . - - - - . . - -
"
: x x )4:/
~ ",," ~
5,000
en
"0
C
W
a.
'C
r-
(l)
<3
:c
(l)
>
(l)
Cl
CIl
....
(l)
>
~
"
r-
4,000
x
3,000
2,000
. 0 . 0 . . 0:_ . . 0 Ox 0 0:0000. 0 ~ : 0 _ oX 00 ':_ _ 0 0 . . . 0:0 _ 0 00000:00000000:.0000000: 0000. 0 0 ~ 0 0 00000
x:' X
'X X . >.< X
, x.:X
1,000 0.... X '0 0 X X':o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:- 0 . 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 -:. . . 0 0 0 0 0: 0 . . . 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 . . . 0 0 0 : . . 0 0 0 0 0
X '
x'* X:
X X:
o
o
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
------ Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 5.994(X) + 134.114
R2 = 0.88
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
300
Institute of Transportation Engineers
.
Apartment
(220 )
.
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs:
On a:
Dwelling Units
Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
Number of Studies:
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units:
Directional Distribution:
69
238
16% entering, 84% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate
0.51
Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
0.10
1.02
0.73
Data Plot and Equation
700
600
o .
-. -... 1.... - - ","-
. . . , . .
. -.... - ," - - -...; -. -.. - "," - -... -,-' -. -. -," -.. -. -," -... --
500
, . . . . . , . . "".
-.. - -. - -.. -.. - -. - -....... -. -' -.. - - -... -.. -.. -.. -..... -.. -. - -.. -.. - _......- . - _..-
. . . . . . . . ." .
200
x
11l
'"0
c:
W
Co
-.::
.-
Q)
"0
:E
Q)
>
Q)
Cl
co
Qj
~
II
.-
400
x
300
. x
oX
x.
:. . . . . .x:. . 0 . . . . ; . . . . . . .: . ' . . . . .:. . . . . . .:. . , . . . .:. 0 . , . . .
100
>S<~ X
. . . 0 . . ; . . . x.X o. . . . . . ~ _ , _ _ . ,:. . -i<<. . .:. . , _ . , _ ; . . . . . . ,:. . . . . . .:. . . . . . .:. . . . . . , :, - . , . . .
X: . 0 . 0 0 . 0 0
X
o
o
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
------ Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.497(X) + 3.238
R2 = 0.83
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
301
Institute of Transportation Engineers
.
Apartment
(220)
.
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Number of Studies: 78
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 232
Directional Distribution: 67% entering, 33% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate
0.62
Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
0.10
1.64
0.82
Data Plot and Equation
700
600 ...---...--
. .
-...... -. -.-
. .
,
,
,
,
. ,
.:-......:.......;.. - -...:.......:-..... .:. ,,>~....<.'...
,-,'~'
,
,
,
- . .:. - . - . - . :. . . - . - . : . - . . - - .: - . - . . ~,:~/. - . - -
soo
. .
. - -.. - -. - -. -.. - - - - -. - -...
. .
1Il
'0
c:
W
c.
~
lD
i3
:c
lD
>
lD
Cl
a:l
'-
lD
>
<(
\I
I-
400
. X -'
. ,
y
. . _ _ . _ J _ . _ . . _ " _ . . . _ . ,'. . . _ . _ .'. . . . _ . _ .. . . . . . _ . _ _ .."~~...._,,._: _ _ . . . . .' _ . . _ _ . .'. _ . _ _ . . .. _ . _ _ _ .
. . . . . ~......../. . .
: x x. ,-,':
. , ~ . ~...,/
. - - . . - . . - . . - - .. - . . - . - -.- . . . . . . ,- . . - - -/(' r . - - - - : . x. . . - ~ - . - _ . - .:. . _ _ . . .:. . . . . . _ ~ _ . _ _ _ _
. . . ....... . . . .
: x x.-,
:x * /' x
. )'<:': ><<
..-...;.......:....-..:./x.~.:...-.~:..-....;-......:.......:-...-..:..-..--:.......
. . , . x x: . . . . .
300
200
100
. -'. . ~- . . .'. - - . . . . : . . . . . . .'. . . .
. . . .
. . .
- -.... - - -.. -.. -..... -".
. . .
o
o
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
- - -- - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.541(X) + 18.743
R2 = 0.75
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
302
Institute of Transportation Engineers
High-Rise .sidential CondominiArrownhouse
(232)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday
Number of Studies: 4
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 543
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate
4.18
Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
3.91
4.93
2.08
Data Plot and Equation
Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size
7,000
. . . . . , . . . . . . ."
6.000 ... - -:-. - - . ~ - - - - ':- - - . - -:" -. - - : - - - . -:- ... - ":" ... - ~ ."_ -. _:_ . _ _. ":_. . _. ~. _ _. ":". _ _. ~;/__ '_
,~"", .
fI)
'0
c:
w
a.
"t:
~
ell
'0
:c
ell
>
ell
01
as
....
ell
>
<
II
~
5,000
4,000
. "
. . . . . . . . . . . ,,"
.... ....... ,................,... .............,... ..... '.>./'" ............
. '" -:.. - -. ~ - - -..:- - - . - -:. - - -- ~ -. - - - ~ - --. -:-. - -. ~ >-",<<~'. - -:.. -.. ~. - - - .:--. - - .:. - - -.
..
. . . . . . ""~""":
. . . - -.. . - - - . - - - . - . - - - . .. - - - - - . . ~~~;;,,, - - .. - - . - - . - - . - - . . - . - -., . - - . . . - - - - - - - . . .. - - - . .
3,000
2,000
. . . . . . . . .
- - -. - -. - -'.. - - -. - - -.. -.. - - -.. - -. -.. - -. -.. - - - -.. - -.. - - -..-
' , , . . , . . . .
1,000
. _ _ _ _: "":,,L' _ _ _: _ . . _ _ :. _ . . _ _: _ _ _ . _ : . . . . . :_ . _ _ . _:. _ _ _ _ : . _ _ . _ :_ . _ _ _ .: _ . . _ . : _ _ . . .:_ . . _ _ _: _ _ _ . _
,,"~
)l('
o
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
- - - - -- Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 3.n1(X) + 223.657
R2 = 1.00
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
394
Institute of Transportation Engineers
High-Rise Reside_al CondominiumfToAouse
(232)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
Number of Studies: 4
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 543
Directional Distribution: 19% entering, 81 % exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
0.34
0.31
0.48
0.59
Data Plot and Equation
Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size
III
"C
C
W
a.
.t:
.-
CI)
'0
:c
CI)
>
CI)
Cl
a:l
....
CI)
~
II
.-
500
, ~
>~/~~;/
. "",.
. .. . . j'"
400 ~... -:- . - - - ~ . . . - . :- - - - - -: - - - - - ~ - - . . - :- . - - . -: - . . - - : - - - . - :- - . - - -: - - ;,.,,1' ~ - - - -
;,//>'~
, ,
. ";",, .
300 - - . . .:- - ., - ~ -. - . -:. .. . . -:- -. - - ~ - - - - -:- - - - - -:~>;/.
, ,
,
. . . . /// . . . . . .
200 . - -. ',' - -. -, - - - - - ,-' - -. .,... - - ,_........ - - -,- - - -., - - - - -,- - - - - -,' - -. -: - - - - -,- - - - - ',-" -.
,
x , ,/'
/~~/
",' .
- -....~ ~ . - - - ~ - - - - .:. - - - - ~ - - . . . ~ . - - - .: - - - - . ; . . . - . ~ . . - . .: - . . - . : - . . - -:. - - . - .: - - . . -
, ~,
, x~
'~
,
0'........ :
100
o
100 200 300 400 500 GOO 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
- - - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.288(X} + 28.861
R2 = 0.98
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
395
Institute of Transportation Engineers
1iiiL
High-Rise &idential Condominiu~ownhouse
(232)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Number of Studies: 5
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 444
Directional Distribution: 62% entering, 38% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
0.38
0.34
0.49
0.62
Data Plot and Equation
Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size
600
In
U
C
w
.Q-
~
C1l
(3
:c
C1l
>
C1l
Cl
co
....
C1l
>
~
"
I-
,
, ,
..
. - - . ~ . - - - .' - - - . - '. - - . - I . _ _ _ ... _ _ _ _ _' _ _ _ _ _ ... _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ .' _ _ _ _ _'. _ _ _ _ .. . _ . _ -I _ _ . _ .,.....':' ~~ "'. :.
500 . . . , , . , , . . . : //
...~...
,
. ,
- - - . .: - - . . .' - - . - - '. - - . - ~ - . - - .' . - - - - '. - - - - " . . . - ~ - - - . " - - - - - '. . -,,-,,::"
400 , ,~......
: //",;
,
. //",/' .
. . . . . . . J' ' . . . . .
300 ,- - -', - -" -,' -" -," -";" -, ',-" - -." -, ':- ~;.._,,;, _ _ ',_" _ '," _ _ _; _', _', _ _" _,"" '."'"
. //,/~
//<'
. . . . '.,.' . . . . . .. . .
200 .. - -; - . -. -,- -. - -,- - - - - f - - - - -.,/.., . - ",- - - - -," - -' . T'" - ",- - .. ",- - -. - r _ .. _;' _ _ _ _,_' _ _ _._ _ _ . _
o
o 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
------ Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.342(X) + 15.466
R2 = 0.99
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
396
Institute of Transportation Engineers
~
.
.
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
~."....IH.......I::n:R". rwater
... ..... ..
... ..... .
... ..... ...
.. ..... .....
>:::=:. ":;::::.": ::::;;:'".
.-.-.,...... ..-.-........
-~~
I)~
CASE #: _FL
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans
~ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ /2.DS .00
FLExmLE DEVELOP:MENT APPLICATION
(Revised 03/29/01)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Secti o2SijP 20 200f
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC, a Florida lirni ted liab' ~
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
30 Jelliff Lane, South}X)rt, cr 06490
PHONE NUMBER:
(203) 256-7788
FAX NUMBER:
(203) 256-7787
CK. NO. IOSLI
DAlE <Yt U) ~ :5.W.
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
(Sarre as above)
(Must include ALL owners)
AGENT NAME: E. D. Annstronq III, Esquire
Jolmson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A.
MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box 1368. Clearwr'ltFr, Fr. ii7"ih- lihR
PHONE NUMBER:
(727) 46J-1R1R
FAX NUMBER:
(727) 441-8617
8.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
501 Mandalay Avenue
STREET ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein.
PARCEL NUMBER:
05-29-15-99216-000-0010
PARCEL SIZE:
6.164 acres m.o.l.
(acres. square feet)
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): 200 multi -famil V units
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): The applicant has slllultaneously submitted an application for
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
rezoning to HDR. This is a request for Flexible Ieveloprrent Approval as described in
detail on Exhibit "B" attached heret..n. ann inco t-..ed hpr .
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OFLl"EVELO"PMENI ~ \fDRJ;Jt'PiW&USL Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO --1L (if yes. attach a copy of the applicable documents
Page 1 of 5 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
"
.
.
'~
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is
located.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
o Address the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets
as necessary):
See Exhibit "B" attached.
Page 2 of 5 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required;
o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines.)
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 1 O'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A. R.) for all nonresidential uses.
o
REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible;
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
o
Page 3 of 5 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
a REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) (color rendering if possible);
a IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
a BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Yo X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
I. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 Yo X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip
generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the
Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
K. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Swom to and subscribed before me this ,;J../)'r'k- day of
~~~ bcU""", A.D. 20.Q...L to me and/or by
E. . . A r'n\STron~ 1JI, who is personally known ~ed
as~
~.t.~
'>~A''''~n'< Joyne E. Sears
~*:' ';*% MY COMMISSION # 00041.66 EXPIRES
~'" ....<>"'1 September 2, 2005
..t.9f.,,~:t-.. 60NDED THRU TROY fAIN INSURANCE. INC
Page 4 of 5 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
09-18-01 02:37pm
FrOm-JOHNSON,~LY
+7274418617 ~
T-752 P.02/03 F-770
L. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
GRE:BNMACK ~, LLC, a Florida limited liability conpany
(Names of all property OWTleno)
1- That (1 anvwe are) the owner(s) and record title nolder(s) of the fOllowing described property (address or generalloeation):
501 Mandalay Avenue, Clea1:Water Beach -
Parcel #05-29-15-99216-000-0010 -
2. That tl'IlS property constitutes th8 property for wnich a request for a: (describe request)
Flexible development approval .
~. That ttle underslgnea (haS/have) appointed and (does/dO) appoint:
E. D. A1:mstrong III, Esguire of Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns,P.A.
as (hl:ottheir) il5lent(S) [0 elCecute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect sucn petition;
4. That tl'lis affidaVit has been eJt;BcUteCl to rnouee me City of Clearwater. Florida to canl>ic:ler anti act an the above described property;
5. That site visits tei the property are-necessary by City representatives in order to process thiS applic:ation anCllhe owner authonzes City representatives to
~lSll and photograpn the property described in this application;
6. That (I/we). the underelgned autnordy. hereby certify that the foregOing is t/'U8 and correct.
~_~, me T.Tf'
Property Owner I. 'J fJ {\v1ft---
Bv: ~
Property Owner ~.Ly P. Marcus, Sr. Vice President
STA'IE OP O)NNECl'ICUT )
COUNTY OF . )
Before me the L.Intlers:lll"le1 an officer dUlY commi1l51onecl by lhl laws of tne State of Ronda. an this /t3~ day of
Sept. . 00 per&Onally appearecl Barry P. Marcus * wno I'18ving been first tlUly sworn
Deposes ana says that ne/she fUlly ~nderstanc:l$ the contents of the OIffldavit that nelGne signea. .~/k-f?
was Sr. Vice President of Greenfield Clearwater,
LLC, Managing M;rrber of Greemack Clearwater, LLC ' Notary Pubhc
My Commission Expires: 'I /3) J~
S:IP/anning DopanmrmrlApP/it;iJUfln Fcrmsldovtt:/opmetlr feviewlflcxiblo (/ovtt:lopmtt:nt IIppllcarlon.doc
.vzaeOo;.7 ", - ClgQrwatg( f"'loxlbh' Q..v..I..t',,.....n~ Appl;"..~on
Page 5 of 5 - Flexible Development ApplicCltlon - Ci"t)' ot Clearwater
.
.
EXHIBIT "A"
Lots 1 through 9, YACHT BASIN SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, recorded
in Plat Book 25, Page 35, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
.
.
EXHIBIT "B"
Description of Request:
Flexible development approval to allow development of the proposed Catalina, as
shown on the enclosed site plan, as a Residential I nfi II Project, including the following:
1. North Villa at a maximum height of 130 feet (above FEMA 100 year flood
elevation).
2. Midrise Villa at a maximum height of 99 feet (above FEMA 100 year flood
elevation).
3. 17 -foot setback of building from seawall, where 18 feet is required.
4. Zero setback of structures (not including buildings) from the westerly boundary,
where 15-25 feet is required.
5. Zero setback of structures (not including buildings) from the easterly boundary,
where 10-15 feet is required.
6. Zero setback of structures (not including buildings) from the seawall, where 18
feet is required.
The applicant is requesting that the existing non-conforming density of 202 units be
treated as conforming. The proposed project is 200 units, based on a redevelopment of
the existing 202 multi-family units on the property, in compliance with Code
Section 6-1 09.B which states: "A structure which is nonconforming with respect to
density may be reconstructed on the same parcel with the same density provided such
reconstruction complies with all other requirements of this Community Development
Code."
General Applicability Criteria (Code Section 3-913.A):
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,
bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is
located.
The location of the property on Clearwater Bay at the northeast corner of
Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street is appropriate for the additional height
requested.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair
the value thereof.
The proposed development will not change the nature of the use as multifamily
and will decrease the density of the property to 200 units. Improvements such as
.
.
enhanced landscaping and structured parking will improve the appearance of the
area.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
It is the continuation of a residential use which should not have an effect on
health or safety of persons in the area.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The site is designed for ease of traffic flow in and out of the property, including
widened tum-arounds for emergency and utility vehicles a guard gate setback
which will allow more stacking of vehicles on the site to eliminate congestion on
Mandalay Avenue.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development will be appropriate in the north Clearwater Beach
community, which is primarily residential and resort.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects,
including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties.
The proposed development is residential so hours of operation do not apply.
With regard to the visual effect, the proposed development, which includes
additional landscaping, will improve the appearance of the neighborhood.
Flexibility Criteria for Residential Infill Projects (Code Section 2-504.F):
1.
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for
development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from
the intensity and development standards.
\)~)" 'r
?Jvt)~ ~
~:
2.
The rebuilding of 200 units on the property is supported by Code Section 6-
109.B. The minimal setbacks of structures other than buildings allow for
enhancement of the site through orderly traffic flow and access to facilities.
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential
infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties.
2
.
.
The proposed development will enhance rather than reduce the value of abutting
properties because it does not represent a change in use or density, only an
improvement of the site conditions and structures.
The existing Yacht Basin Apartments were constructed on the property over 20
years ago and there are a number of nonconformities with regard to setbacks,
parking and landscaping. The proposed development reflects the redevelopment
of the existing number of residential units with the most minimal deviations from
Code standards. The applicant proposes replatting the property from nine lots to
one lot.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the
district.
The proposed use remains multi-family residential which is a permitted use in the
HDR district.
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent
land uses.
The proposed development will be appropriate in the north Clearwater Beach
community, which is primarily residential and resort.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential
infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
The proposed development will enhance and upgrade the area. Landscaping
alone will be an enhancement. The applicant proposes planting of Medjool date
palms at 30' centers along Mandalay Avenue that will meet the City's Beach by
Design standards. There will be a tree-lined promenade along the seawall.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and
function which enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater
as a whole.
Approval of the proposed residential infill project will allow redevelopment of the
existing multi-family units in a manner which minimizes other impacts. It will
enhance and upgrade this area of north Clearwater Beach.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street
parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
3
,
.
eJ
Clearwater as a whole. Building height, may only exceed 80 feet, however,
if the parcel proposed for development fronts on Clearwater Bay or is only
separated from Clearwater Bay by a public open space.
The property is located on Clearwater Bay which supports the height of the two
villas which exceed 80 feet.
#248304 v1
4
Jr
<
>" i, :';- ~.:S'> J'{}
. 0 1-05 1685 FE8-20-200 1 4: t
PINELLAS CO BK 11231 PG 2655
. 111111I1111111111 1111111111 111111111111111111I1111
PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
Joseph J. Sorota, Jr.
JOSEPH J. SOROTA, JR., P.A.
28100 U.S. Highway 19 North, Suite 504
Clearwater, Florida 33761-2686
Tel: (727) 796-1557
KAkLfEN F. DE BlAKER, CLERK OF COORi :
PHfllAS COlJITY, FUJUDA
........-...-, ...-.---.-.-
- ...- ," c '\
~!') / ,> t ,~) , :;) t.
--------------------------------------
8C142629 02-20-2001 16:20:57
51 OED-LIMA LAKE It
OOX)()OO)()O
IU: BK:
RECORDING 002 PAGES
DOC STAMP - DR219
YMW
SP6:
1
3
EP6:
$10.5
$71875.0
, ': ,:
. TOTAl:
P CHEac: AMI. TENDERED:
CHANGE:
B~__ DEPUTY CLERK
$71,585.5
$71,585.5
$.0
,': ~ ( . .
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS INDENTURE made this 20th day of February, 2001, between the following named
parties:
GRANTOR: LIMA LAKE, INC., a Florida corporation
GRANTOR'S ADDRESS: Post Office Box 3488, Clearwater, Florida 33767
GRANTEE: GREENMACK CLEARWATER, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company
GRANTEE'S ADDRESS: 30 Jelliff Lane, Southport, Connecticut 06490
(Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to
this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and
the successors and assigns of corporations)
(
WIT N E SSE T H:
That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/IOO ($10.00)
DOLLARS and other valuable consideration, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, by these
presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the Grantee,
all that certain land situate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz:
Lots 1 through 9, YACHT BASIN SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof,
recorded in Plat Book 25, Page 35, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Property address: 501 Mandalay Avenue. Clearwater, Florida 33767-1702
Tax Parcel 1.0.# 05-29-15-99216-000-0010
TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging
or in anywise appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever.
AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that it is lawfully seized of said land
in fee simple; that it has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that it hereby
specially warrants the title to said land for any acts of the Grantor and will defend the same
against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under Grantor but not otherwise;
and that said land is free of all E3ncumbrances except the following:
" ."~ ,- ,. t 1
/:"~~""l'~~_- .. .
RE" {52.
DH2 \ :)-7/ . ,l.A
c.....__ 2.
iIH___
Subject to taxes and assessments for the year of conveyance and subsequent
years.
'~-.--
Subject to Distribution Easement granted to Florida Power Corporation by
instrument recorded in O.R. Book 5026, Page 1740, Public Records of Pinel/as
County, Florida.
r:.~. ____
. ;.~ ----
;:"i --3
. "--1J52f- j)
._," i .
l~lf\,. ..
... '., 'I L }.-
,""'--
Subject to any and all rights of the United States of America over any lands now or
formerly lying under navigable waters, arising by reason of the authority of the
.,.
. \ .-------
Special Warranty Deed
Page 1 of 2
.
PINELLRS COUNTY FLR.
OFF.REC.8K 11231 PG 2656
United States of America to control navigable waters in the interest of navigation
and commerce, and any conditions contained in any permit authorizing the filing of
such areas.
.
4. Subject to the rights of parties now in possession under any unrecorded leases.
5. Subject to the terms and provisions of all agreements and franchises pertaining to
the cost, installation, operation, and maintenance of gas, water and/or sewer
facilities.
6. Subject to zoning and other governmental regulations affecting the use of the
property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day
and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and witnessed
in our presence:
"GRANTOR"
LIMA LAKE, INC., a Flori
~~
By: Michael C. Rausch, President
(Corporate Seal)
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~o r1t- day of February,
2001, by Michael C. Rauscty President of LIMA LAKE, INC., a Florida corporation, who 0 is
personally known to me or [iJhas produced ::Illinois dnvU'~ /1~'!I1S~ as identification.
~t,~
ig ture of Notary Public
Printed name:
Commission Expires:
","1A\:~~0;;.._ Jayne E. Sears
{*r~';'r.1 MY COMMISSION N CC646775 EXPIRES
;..'1'~"~"! September 2, 2001
"~.iif.:l~~;'" BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE. HIe
A:\NIC0710 Yacht Basin sale to Mack docs\Special Warranty Deed.wpd
Special Warranty Deed
Page 2 of 2
.
.
TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT
FOR
CATALINA
I. INTRODUCTION
This traffic assessment was prepared to comply with Section 4-801 of the City of Clearwater
Community Development Code.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
According to the Pinellas County MPO 2001 Level of Service Report Mandalay Avenue carries
14,410 AADT (Annual Average Daily Traffic). Information taken from the Traffic
Analvsis/Preliminarv Engineering Report for Mandalav A venue/Papava Street/San Marco Street
Reconstruction indicates Mandalay A venue carries 942 vehicles during the PM peak hour which
represents LOS C conditions on a four-lane undivided roadway. That same report stated
completion of the Mandalay Beach Club Condominium would add 656 daily trips of which 56
would occur during the PM peak hour, and LOS C conditions would be maintained.
III.
FUTURE CONDITIONS ~
~
The proposed Catalina development will include ')0'f condominium units on the northeast corner
of Mandalay A venue/Baymont Street. Trip generation estimates were made using ITE Trip
Generation, 6th Edition Land Use Code 232 (High-Rise Residential CondominiumITownhouse).
Catalina would generate 844 daily trips of which 69 would occur during the AM peak hour (13
entering/56 exiting) and 77 would occur during the PM peak hour (47 entering/30 exiting). To
be conservative, it was assumed all traffic would use Mandalay Avenue, although Poinsettia
Avenue is a parallel alternative.
With the Catalina project traffic included, Mandalay Avenue would continue to operate at LOS
C during the PM peak hour carrying 1,075 vehicles. Catalina traffic represents only 3.56% of
the LOS D peak hour capacity as shown below.
Existing Traffic
Mandalay Beach Club
Catalina
Total
LOS D Capacity
Catalina % LOS D
14,410
656
844
15,910
23,775
3.55%
942
56
77
1,075
2,160
3.56%
SEP 2 0 2.001
Development of the Catalina project would not result in unacceptable levels <
Mandalay Avenue. Project traffic would comprise 3.56% of the LOS D "capacit.y."
Avenue.
IV. CONCLUSION
C/)O
0....
..JC/)
"ien
'i: en
CI) ftS
~u
C/)
o
..J
5'C
._ CI)
....CI)
Uc..
Cl)C/)
C/)
>
C/)
:E
g,e:
03
g,~
iijl-
t: ~
<I-
"0
lD ~ lD
U) e _ 8-
:I: u. u. ~
u: ~ 'l:l E
alj.=
II>
-g~~lQ
.c 0..
....
CI)
:E
ftS '6' ftj ~
~ < (I) u.
~
.c
....
Q
C
CI)
..J
"g;
If I-
c
CI)
CI)
!
CI)
m
'ltiij
.r::.
e:
lD
...J
u:
...J
<
..,
:!l~
~I-
....
CI)
f
....
C/)
c
o
o
Z
U
CI)
C/)
c
~~
g>...J
(I)
1li
E Q)
Olo.
~(I)
> Q)
l'? E
I-j::
o
~
"I
~ ,...
~'"
C'l!.o
~
0.
'"
o
!2
Ol
o <
m
Z "I
u.
J:
0..
o
<( '"
"I
O!
n 8
~ ~
;:)
o
o
00
:8
EO
:; ~
c:i
~
I-
o
~
o
Q) :;;
:; 0
iI:8
'Co
; ~
~
i.
o
0::
o
~
e
u.
~ ~
>- .~
ftS .-
_0..
ftS S
'C >.
C ~
ftS -
:::E ~
0::
<::
32
o
to- ~
o 0
<ot ....
t
o
M
o
Q)
"I
~
~
~
o
"I
....
o (I)
M
b
Z M
<0
....
o
<( '"
"I
O!
n 8
~ ~
;:)
~
o
00
:8
o
E
:; ~
c:i
o
.
i.
o
(I)
z
z g
~ z
.c
-
0)
'C :;;
; 0
CI) 8
c...
c..0
=~
.c
D.
(:)
0)
It)
0::
C/)
"I
z
~
.r::.
0;
(i) s
8-
"ig.
.c :c
f ~
ftS '"
:::Eo::
(I)
<::
~ ~
M
o
Q)
u;
<0
~
~
o
~
C (I)
M
b
Z M
<0
....
o
<('"
"I
O!
n 8
~ ~
;:)
o
o
00
:8
E 0
~ 0;
It) C!
c:i
o
~
CI) U;
oX 0
ell
..J 8
'C 0
C ::J
ftS "I
'C
0::
CI)
C
CI)
CI)
lll:
'C ~
0:: lD
C ...
__CI) ~
S
:J "0
:::E 0::
U :!l
:::E ~
<::
o
It) 15
N "I
It) '"
<(
....
'"
<0
~
Q) u;;
~ c c ('I')
cD Q) Q)
M E E 01
.~ ~ re
"0"0"1
.~ .~ co
N ~~ ~
2 .2>.2> 0
'o'" II> II>
N ~ ~ ~
! ~ co
Ci)'ti)t:\i
e: e:
~ ~
"0"0
1l1l~
c: c: ~
.r::..r::.
~'j 0
ii~
e:e:.
o ~ ~ <
88....
b
"I
~
~
M
~~~
z
~
~~~
000
<( "'''''''
"INN
O!O!O!
n :5:515
~ 00. 00. ~
;:).
o
"'''''''
~~~
r-ir-ir-i
N
000000
:8:8:8
000
E
........ ....
0010101
MC!C!C!
N
o
000000
000000
.... .... ....
~u;u;
o
(I)
Z
~~~
o 00....
CO
It)
0:: ~~~
C/)OO";
'g888
ftS 000
-. .
= 000
c.. <0 <0 <0
C/)
E
o
-
-
o
m
'C ~
0:: iii "3
.c~2.0
- .-<000
o ~:8 '"
o - 0:: 0::
m 5 (I) (I)
C 80S
..! 0::: ~
~~-g
:J 0."00
:::E (I)~~
U IS c ~
:::E S8 ffi
>>>
.... g g ~
0) .... 'l- '"
.... .......... C'\I
<
u..
..
..
..
0100
<ri~
~~
o ~:6
CO '": C!
N
M
~2l
ON
,..;,..;
bb
"I'"
oqoq
~~
.... ....
C < <
........
mm
Z ........
~~
00
<( "''''
"IN
O!O!
nf5f5
~ 00. ~
;:) .... ....
~~
........
,..;,..;
N
0000
:8:8
00
E
.... ....
NOlO>
NC!C!
N
NN
00
rDrD
<0<0
~~
"I
<0<0
U) ~ 'l;
C
"i
:::E
'C
C
ftS
o
CO
It)
0::
C/)
88
00
00
<0<0
'C
0::
;: e-Iii
o .!! e:
o .n 'jjj
m ~::i:
I "I 0
C~~
..! 0:: .!!
"5 0 e:
~ S!!:!.
-= 0 "I
U 00 0
:::E ~ ~
(1)0
<::<::
0:5
Q) ;:a; '"
~ "I "I
u.m
u. U. u..
u..
"'M
"'....
~a:i
...."1
..
..
..
~8:;:
"";o:i......
.... .... ....
MM'l;
"";MT""
....0'"
...."1....
0) ~ ~:;;
CD q T"': ~
<ot
M
01010>
000
"INN
,..;,..;,..;
~~~
oqoqoq
000
"INN
.... .... ....
C < < <
............
moo
Z ............
"INN
........ ....
000
<( "'''''''
"INN
O!O!O!
n 151515
~ ~OO.~
:::t .............
M....o>
"1<000
"',...,...
,..;,..;,..;
N
000000
:8:8:8
E 000
co C;; 0; C;;
oC!C!C!
N
1::!~!::1
....OOM
.or-i,..;
<0,...,...
~~~
o
:r
"5
e.:g~~
o 0"; 0
Q)
0:: 888
C/) 000
'C 000
C<O<O<O
ftS
-
C/)
c
"i
:::E
'C
0:: lii Iii
.c E~o
.. 'fie....
g '" 0:':
m Q~~
· 0 co 0
cmE<O
..! 0:: .r::. 0::
"5 (I) * (I)
:::E S uS
U Iii ~ Iii
:::E .5 '" ~
~ffio
<::<::<::
000
to- :8fO:8
~ "I "I "I
o
co
to- ~
NN
C'Ii
N~
'"
o lEl
<ot '"
"to
~
C <
m
,z M
o
<( '"
"I
O!
nf5
~ 00.
;:)
N
00
:8
E 0
....
~ 01
0) C!
c:i
~ ~
Q.
C/)
E
~ ~
o 0
m 0
'C ~
C
ftS 0
~ ....
Q.
C/)
.c
1::
o
Z
'C
0::0.
(I)
;: E
o ~
o al
lJlI S
C IV
..! ~
"5~
:::E "I
U '"
:::E:;;:
o
<::
o
CD ~
o
m
M
"I
....
r-i
M
<ot C
ai Q)
N E
g>
II>
"0
.~.
<ot OJ
<ot g,
.... '(;;
NE
'"
~
~
"0
X
Q)
e:
:;
.~
"0
Q)
e:
o ~
8
b
0>
'l;
~
....
....
b
Z '"
N
<(
~
O!
n 15
~ 00.
;:)
,...
....
....
N
00
<0
'"
E 0
....
0) '"
M C!
ooi
N
~
N
<0
0>
<0
ig
C/) ~
E
o
== 0
o
m
'C ~
C 0
ftS 0
m ~
CI) 0
~ ....
..J
C
o
c..
~
ftS
....
'C
0::0.
.c(l)
- IS
o tl
o al
lJlI S
~ ~
:J IV
:::EI::.
U ~
:::Eo::
o
<::
o
"I
It) ~
~
o
o
"I
<0
r-i
M
o
Q)
o
co
.
.~
1:1
t:
CII
&
q;
C
....
Q)
.r::.
'0
Q)
19
II>
.:
o
..z
~ II
~o
CIl(l)
pz
I- ....'
0.9..
0'"
u.::i:
E.!!
0'"
::0
e: e:
Q) 0
lDZ
lI:: II
'6.-
~~
-(/)
~z
~-c
_ lD
0-
e:o.
CIl 2
OlD
. c
'2
OJ::J
e: Q)
o e:
:w ca
0.-
~d
aljl-
II II
"'::J
';"1
:0 .
f!~
go.
'" E
u. CIl
>.-
- e:
.r::. .-
Ole:
x::J
II lD
'" e:
a;~~
::331;
~::i: 5i
>U-J
"'::J "
Li; :2 :>.
.... .0
..... e:
E .-
o~~
"CmQ)
:60 lii
O::-"'...J
JJ,'~ ~
cD ~"in
:o<1Q
!!!~o..
o.QQ)
~~.~
~c.2
~-t.l
II II X
N....W
~~~
o >- .
o..mQ)
~~~
~Q)>-
IIU:~
-8..ro
~u;u.
I- CIl Z .
t: g;r;j u
<I-O::,s
~oCl)
~ .~ u. .e
~ ~ .!!
I- e:U
II 0.20
. ti - II)
r- '" ,~~
..- '0",
. Q) e:
e: e:'- 1:1
.!!!.!!!l5t:
'tlt:,=Cll
~9~...
~l ea~.
It O..lll::::::
;:("'~o
i:i~o..cl,
o II II.....
:i~~>_~
0:2 < <.1::
z .:::
z
<(
n
~
;:)
o
E
o
~
~
en
oX
U
o
0::
C
.ftS
:c
.E
"
C
IV
'C
0::
o
~
ell
..J
I
~
i
(3
c(
.c
-
CO
"i::
CI)
.c
u
IV
n
c
..!
.c
CI)
:::E.
o
M
~
It)
.
.
1998 Level of Service ..,-:'cmoZ;'ook
Florida Departmel}t of Transpcrtation
Table 5-4
GENERALIZSJ ANNUAL AV ERAGE DAILY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S ~
URBANIZED AREAS.
.
~~
.-
STAle rwo.WM MTERIALS FREEWA'YS
IlNffITERU'ml FlOW . -
nalgnellzed - Group 1 -(lolIHn _zocl _ "".500.000 _IMdng" ........_5...... alllIe
Lan'" lev el 01 Se<vice ~cl""._",,"_dl8lllcll -
DIvided A a e D E lev1lf 01 Sety ice -
2 Undiv Ided 8.900 13,900 18.900 24.800 33.100 I Lan.. A a e D E
4 DiY Ided 21,500 35.800 50.100 60.100 71,600 4 21.200 34,300 51,500 66,200 81.700
6 DiY Ided 32,200 53.700 75.200 90.200 107 400 6 32.600 52,700 79,000 101,600 125.400
8 44,500 71,800 107.800 138.600 171,100
10 55,600 89.800 134,700 173.200 213,800
IN1eHU'TEIl FlOW 12 65 200 105 400 158 100 203 200 250 900
...
Class I j>O.oo" ull.....__...._1 Group 2 ____....In_1I
Lan.., level 01 Se<v ice lev el 01 Se<v ice
DIvided /If" a e D- e- Lan.. A a e D E
2 UIlIiv Ided NIA 10.800 15,600 16,600 16,600 4 20,900 32,800 49,200 62,600 74.soo
4DiYIded N1A 23,500 33,200 35,000 35,000 6 32,100 50,400 75,600 96,200 114.soo
8 DiY Ided NIA 35.800 49,900 52,500 52,500 8 43,800 68,800 103,200 . 131,300 156,3QO
8DiYIded NIA 45,300 61.400 64,400 64,400 10 54,700 86,000 129.000 164,200 195,400
12 64,100 100.800 151,200 192.400 229.100
Class II l2.OO 10 4.50 olpIzocl __ .........
NON-STAle ROIlOWAlS
Lan.., lev eI 01 Se<vice Wo.ltR ClTYICQJNlY RlWlWAYS
DIvided /If" a- e D E
2 Undiv Ided NIA NIA 9.900 14,900 16,200 lev el 01 Se<v ice .
4DiYIded NIA N1A 22,900 32,500 34,300 Lan.. /If" a- e D E
6 DiY Ided NIA N1A 35.SOO ~9OO 51.700 2 Undiv ided NIA NIA 8,600 14,600 16,000
8 DIY Ided NIA N1A 44.700 60.100 63.400 4 DiYided NIA NIA 19,800 31,700 33,900
6 DiY ided NIA NIA 30.800 47.800 51.000
Class In ......._..so...,....__....____,........,ctty 4L1) 14850 2.~, 115 25;"\00
Aft'" b...... dlaMCt of ~.... ow<< $OO.GIlXR 0lHER SIGNAU2ED RlWlWAYS
(signalized intersection analysis)
Lan.., level 01 Se<vice Lan.. /If" a- e D E
DIvided /If" a- e D E 2 Undiv ided I N1A N1A 4,800 10.900 11.900 I
2 Undiv Ided N1A NIA 3,300 12,100 15,800 4 DiY ided N1A N1A 11,600 23.800 25.400
4 DiY Ided NIA N1A 7,800 27,800 . 33,600
6DIYIded NIA N1A 12,100 43,300 50.500
8 DiY Ided NIA NIA 15.300 54,200 62. 1 00
IIOJUSlMENTS
llMDEOAH:lIVIDED
Class IV ......._4.50olgnoll________cl"- ......_....-,___1__
"""__01_""____
- . Ld Tum Mlu-.nt
Lan.. MedIan ae,. - FaclDra
Lan.., level 01 Se<vice 2 Ow Ided Yes +5'1.
DIvided It. a- e D E 2 Undiv Ided No -20%
2 Undiv Ided NIA NIA 3,700 13,800 15,300 MulII ~lded Yes -5~
4 Divided NIA N1A 8.900 29,900 32,600 L MulIi Undiv Ided No -2S*f.J
6 Divided NIA NIA 14.000 45,500 49,000
8DIYided NIA NIA 17.500 56.200 60,100 ONE.WAY
...._....-,__ val_i__
The Florida Depallmentol TranspOltation On..Way Mlu-.nt -.
Source: Sy SIems Planning Oflice Lana e.o-
605 SuwaMee Slreet . Mil Station 19 - """"""_1-- FIICtOra
2 4 - .~
Tallahassee, Aorida 32399-0450 3 6 ..~-'
http://_.dot.slate.ll.usIplanning 4 8 .~
5 8 u -25% . .
. The table does not conslitute a standard and should be used only lor general planning appications. The computer models lrom which Ihis table is.derived
should be used lor more specillc planning applicaIions. The table and deriving computer models should not be used lor corridor or lnlersediOn deSign."'.
more relined techniques exist. Values shown ant lIIVlUaI average daiy volumes (based on K100 lactors. not Pesk.lo-<laily ratIOs) lor levels t;!I s8IYlce.l!.I1d
are based on the 1997 Update to lite Hi9h-Y Capacity Manual and Florida IraIlic, roadway, and signaization data. The lable's input Y.8U11 assum!lliOl!S and
level 01 service criteria appear on Ihe loIIowing page. -
.. Cannot be achieved.
U. Volumes are comparable because i1IlllSection capacities haY e been reached. September 1998
-
~ I
I
~
.....
@
I
('
I
I
I
I
.
1998 Level 01 SSl1/icB Handbook
Flori~a Department of Transportation
Table 5-7
.
I URBANIZED AREAS"
Unslgnallzed
Un_
DIvided -~
2 Undivided
4 Divided
6 Divided
STJQE lWo-WAY MlERllt.S
UNNl'ERR./l'1CD A.OW
A
810
1,950
2.930
B
1,270
3,260
4.890 __
Level of_ Selvice
c-
1,720
4.560
6.840
IH1ERRUPm) IUlW
Class I (>0.00 10 1... .i9IeIlzod "*-- ...._.
Un_
DIvided
2 Undivided
4 Divided
6 Div ided
8 Divided
~
N/A
N1A
N1A
N/A
B
1,000
2, 190
3.330
4.210
Level of Selvice
C
1.450
3.080
4.640
5.710
Class n C2-OO 10 4.50 ....Izod '-ocI_ .........
Unesl
Divided
2 Undivided
4 Divided
6 Div ided
8 Div ided
/It.
N/A
N1A
N/A
N/A
B-
NlA
NlA
NlA
N/A
Level of Selvice
C
920
2, 130
3.300
4.160
D
2.260
5.470
8.210
D-
1,550
3.260
4.890
5.990
o
1.390
3.020
4,550
5.590
E
3.010 I
6,510
9.770
.....
1,550
3.260
4,890
5.990
E
1,500
3,190
4,810
5.900
Class III :::. ":::i:. ~z-: :=..z-::.:-...::oo-= wl1l1ln pO....., city
Un_
DIvided
2 Undivided
4 Divided
6 Divided
8 Div ided
~
N1A
N1A
N/A
N/A
Level of Selvice
B- C
NlA 310
NlA 720
NlA 1.120
N/A 1.410
D
1.110
2,560
3,980
4.990
E
1,450
3,090
4,650
5.710
Class IV tno......4.50.._IZod__.........._wilhlnpo;.....,oil)'c_
1Iuoi-....lIlCtal_ -_500.0001
Un_
DIvided
2 Undivided
4 Divided
6 Divided
8 Divided
N-
N/A
N/A
N1A
N/A
B-
-N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Level of Selvice
C
340
820
1,290
1.610
The FIorida Department of Transportation
- Source: _ Sy stems Planning Of f ice
- 605 Suvennee Street - Mail Station 19
-
Tallahassee. Florida 32399-0450 _
http://-.dot:sfate.fl.usIp1aming
D
1,270
2,750
4,190
5.170
E
1,410
2,990
4.510
5.530
Group 1
Lan..
4
6
8
10
12
FREEWA'tS
~::v:=- ~sc:~ III'd 1_119" crpessing wi1l1ln 5 mil.. 0111.
A
1,900
2,900
3,900
4.900
5.700
B
3,000
4.600
6.300
-7,900
9.300
Lev eI of Selv ice
c-
4,500
7.000
9,500
11.900
13.900
GroupZ /IoiIlln~od__nal...o-,ll
Un..
4
6
8
10
12
Un..
2 Undivided I
4 Divided
6 Divided
4L..v
Un..
2 Undivided I
4 Div ided
L.....
2
2
Wtl
lMUti
One-Way
Lanes
~
A
1,900
3,000
4,000
5,000
5.900
B
3.000
4,600
6,300
7,900
9.300
Level of Selvice
C
4,500
7,000
9,500
11.900
13.900
NOH-STAlE ROADWA'tS
MAlat ClYJCaJNTY ROADWAYS
level of Selvice
C
780
1.810
2.900
1~50
onteR SIGNAlJ28) ROADWAYS
(signali2ed intersection analysis)
B" C
Nil- 430
Nfl- 1.060
lit-
NlA
NfA
NfA
lit-
B"
NlA
N/A
NfA
Nil-
N/I-
ADJUSlMENTS
IlMIlEoiIHJrIIlEO
D
5,800
8,900
12,200
15,200
17,900
D
5,900
8,900
12, 100
15, 100
17,700
D
1.330
2,880
4,350
2./(0()
D
!ISO
2, 170
Medlen
Divided
Undiv ided
Undiv ided
Undivided
loIlor~___incI_pecenl)
Left Turn AdJustment
Bsys Fector.
Yas -+5%.
No -20%
Yas -5%
No -25%...1
ONE-WAY
loI"c_ponding __ .......... 'nclcalld I*C4IIlI
September 1998
E
7,200
11,000
15, 100
16,800
22,100
E
6.900
10.500
14,400
18,000
21.100
E
1.400
3.080
4,640
2,'310
E
1.090
2.310
High-Rise tesidential condominifmrr own house
(232)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday
Number of Studies: 4
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 543
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate
4.18
Range of Rates
3.91 4.93
Standard Deviation
2.08
Data Plot and Equation
Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size
7,000
6,000
. . . . . . . . , . . , . '"
.... ":". - - - -:.... -:- -... -:- -... -: - - - - -:".. - - -:"... - ~. -. -. -:- - - - - ":" - - - - ~.. - - ":". - -. ~-;.,;-- --
~~~~~~~~ :
, ~,
. . . . . . . . . . . ,"
- - . . .'. . - . . ~ - - - . . '. - . - - _'. - . . . ! . - . . - t. _ _ . . .'. . _ _ . ~ . . _ . _', . . . . o' _ _ _ _ . j": _ _
, , , :~~~~~~'
,
~~ ,
, ~~~~~~
-. - - .'.. - - - J _ _ _..... _ _ _ _ 0'. _ _ _ _ J. _. _.'-.. _ _ .'... _. J _ _,,;"'.. _ _ _ _ .'.. _ _ _, _ _ _ _ .to _ _. _ _'. _...
. , . . . . , . "". . . I .
,/
~~;~~~~~~:
. , . . . . ,,' . , ,
. . - - -0" . - . - .. . . . - ... _ . _ _ _t_ _ _ . . .. . . _ _ _ ...",,~ _ _ _to. _ _ _ .. . . _ _ _... . . _ . _0_ . . _ _ . _ _ . .. _0" . . . . ",_ . . . _
, ~~
: -"!.<I'."
U)
"
c
w
a.
'c
I-
CD
13
:2
CD
>
CD
Ol
CIS
~
II
I-
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
. .. ., I , , . . . .
.. - -- -~~--- -- - ~ ~ -- -. - --- - ~- - --. --- -- - ~ ~- ~--- --- ~ --- - ~ - - -- - - - - - ~---- -- -- - - - ---
. . . . . . . . . . . , .
~
~
~
~
~,
.....' ./<+.~~~~ .:.... ..'.....,... ..'..... .'.....,.... .',.... .'.....:.... .'..... .'.....
'" ' . . . . . , , . . . .
~"
~,," :
1,000
o
1 00 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1 000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
------ Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 3.771 (X) + 223.657
R2 = 1.00
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
394
Institute of Transportation Engineers
~~
High-Rise Resid~ial condominiUmITo!house
(232)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
Number of Studies: 4
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 543
Directional Distribution: 19% entering, 81 % exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
0.59
0.34
0.31
0.48
Data Plot and Equation
Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size
500
l/)
"C
c:
W
Q.
';::
I-
Q)
'0
:2
Q)
>
(I)
Cl
<<l
.....
Q)
~
II
I-
~
: x , ,'~'
,/
....~....
/,
.............: . . , , . , , . . .
. ~....(' - - . - - ... . . - - -, - . . - - .. . . . - - ,. . . - . ... - - . - .. - - - - . ... . - . . ., - . - - . . . . - - -.. . . . . -, - . . - -
: x/" , " ", "
"
,<
>)/ :
100
o
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Rtted Curve
- -- - u Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.288(X) + 28.861
R2 = 0.98
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
395
Institute of Transportation Engineers
.iid
j~1
High-Rise .sidential condomini!rrownhouse
(232)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Number of Studies: 5
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 444
Directional Distribution: 62% entering, 38% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
0.62
0.38
0.34
0.49
Data Plot and Equation
Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size
600
III
"C
c:
W
0.
.;::
.-
Q)
(3
:c
Q)
>
Q)
Cl
e
Q)
~
II
.-
o
o 100 200 300 400 500 600. 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500
X = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
------ AverageRate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.342(X) + 15.466
R2 = 0.99
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
396
Institute of Transportation Engineers
.
.
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE DATA
CATALINA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. LOCATION MAP
2. DESIGN DATA
3. SIDE DRAIN FILTER DRA WDOWN ANALYSIS 01
A. DESIGN SUMMARY
B. SPREADSHEET
4. SIDE DRAIN FILTER DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS 02
A. DESIGN SUMMARY
B. SPREADSHEET
5. PARTIAL SITE PLAN
-J
q::
1-1-
wO
I-
ti
1-0
< ~
.~
(!)O
>-J
q::u..
~q::
052
-J II
u..o
q::0::
WW
0::1-
q::~
~
en
>-
-J
q::
Z
q::
Z
~
o
o
~
o
0::
w
I-
-J
u..
Z
~
o
I
W
o
en
.0
~~
I(!)
Ol
>
III
-J
X
III
E
-J
c
"e
-J
ti
>0
< ~
-J
~
>~
ti
0
.cz
< -
-J
q::
I-
.cO
I-
"~
(JJ
III 0
m
.E >
u W~
III
>-
.
x x x x x x x x x x
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
OXOX~XNX~X~X~XOX~X~X~
X X X X X X X~X~XNX~
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x X X X X X X X X X
X~XooXOXNX~XOXooXNXOX~X
XoXoX"':X"':X"':xC\ixC\iX .X'--:XMX
X X X X X X X X~X X~X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
x x X x x x x x x x x
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
xm~mxmxOXOX~XNX~X~X~X
X~ mXmX~XNX~XOXOX~XNX
X~ ~X~X~X~XooX~X~XNX~X
XN NX~X~X~X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
~X~X~X~~~X~X~X~X~X~X~
mXmXmXo OX~XNX~X~X~X~
~XOXooX~ ~x~x~~mx~x~x~
ooX~XmX~XNXmX~ ~X~X~X
NXNX~X~X~X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x X x x X X a x X x
~X~X~X~X~X~X~ ~X~X~X~
~~NXOXooX~X~X~ mX~X~X~
00 ~XNXooX~XNxm~~XNXmX~
~ ~X~XNXNXNX~ ~X~X ~
X ~ X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X ~ X X X X ~ X
x x x x x X X X a X
OXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO OXO
~XOX~XOX~XOX~XOX~ OX~
~X~X~X~X~XOXoo~~X~X~XN
~X~X~X~X~X~X~ ~X~X~X~
~X~X~X~XOXOXO OXOXOXO
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
OXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
NXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x X x x x
OXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
NXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x X x x x x x
OXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
NXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x ~ X X a x x x
X~X~X~X~ ~X~X~ ~X~X~X
X~X~X~X~ ~X~X~ ~X~X~X
X~X~X~X~ ~X~X~X~X~X~X
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
X ~ X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
N~~~O~oo~~~~~~~~~N~~~O
~XoXmX~X~X~X~X~XNX~X
~x~x~xqx~x~x~X~X~X~X
~X~X~X~XOXooX~X~X~X~X
~X~X~X~X~X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x x x x x
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOX
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
~XNXmX~X~XoX~X~X~XooX~
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
NXNXNXNX~X~X~X~XOXOXO
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
OX~X~X~XooX~XNxmX~X~XO
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
X X X X X'X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
.
0"
~
NN
~~
x x
bb
NN
~~
u..
o
0::
o
I-
o
q::
u..
>-
I-
W
u..
q::
en
I
I-
~
en
0::
::::>
o
I
N
~
II
en
0::
::::>
o
:r:
~
~
II II
III III
~ ~
ill q::q::
~ "S"S
........::::>Wllllll
W-JQ..>> Z
~O>o:: Q) Q) I~
::::> ............ 1-0
-JI-u..llllll
OZO"~.~ ~~
>WWxx W>
I-~Zee -Jq::
ZI-:J ~~ Z_OO::
Wq::o::
~WWq::q:: ~O
1-0::1- 01-
q::I-Z
Wu..W-:-........ O::~
O::OO~~ WW
I-~u..~~ ~t;
~O~~~~ ::::>>-
Q.. OOZ Oen
wO::
~~~@)@) ~f2
~ ::;- (fj L;S L;S "~ ~ _ 5 W
-J~-Jo::o::EESc:w~
ozwq::q::-J-J=O::I-
O~~OONNNOoo
OMN~~ ~~.
cD Mj:!j:! Lri~~
I
L_
. YACHT BASIN
.
.
Side Drain Filter Drawdown Analysis 02
Peak tidal influence = 2.5 ft
therefore
to maintain 0.5' of freeboard, the elevation of the centerline of pipe = 3.25ft
bottom of treatment volume = 3.70'
proposed top of treatment volume = 6.00'
By using 140 If of pipe, drawdown can be achieved in 34.8 hours < 36 hours.
R:\yacht basin apartments. doc
9/18/01
en
en
>-
...J
<{
Z
<{
Z
~
o
o
~
0::
o
0::
W
I-
...J
LL
Z
~
o
I
W
o
en
e:
oE
...J
0::
>()
< Z
...J
<{
I-
>}2
0::
()
..cz
< -
...J
~
..cO
l-
e:
Oij)
ro 0
CO
..... >
..c w~
()
ro
>-
.
...J
<{
1-1-
wO
I-
x x x x x x x x x x
~x~x~x~x~x~x~x~x~x~x~
OX~XNX~X~X~X~X~X~XVXV
X X X X X X X~X~XNX~
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X x x X x x
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
X~X~X~X~XNXNX~XvX~XOX
X X X X X X X X X X~X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x x x X x X X
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
X~X~XOX~XOX~XNXroX~Xvx
X~X~XVXNX~X~XOX~X~X~X
X~X~X~XqXroX~X~X~XNX~X
X~X~X~X~X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X x x X x
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
~XOX~X~XNX~X~XOX~X~X~
~XOX~XNXNX~X~X~XOXOXN
roX~X~X~X~X~X~XVX~XNX~
~X~X~X~X g X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X
X ~ x X x x X X X X
~X~ ~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
~XV ~X~X~X~XroX~X~XoX~
~X~ ~xox~xvg~xrox~x~xo
~X~X~X~XNXN NX~X~X~X~
X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x X x x X x x x X X
OXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO
~XOX~XOX~XOX~XOX~XOX~
~X~XvXroX~X~XroXNX~X~XN
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
OXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x x x X x X x x
OXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
NXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
O~O~O~O~O~O~O~O~O~O~O
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
NXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x X x X x X x x x
OXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
NXNgNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x x x X x x x X x x X
gOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOX
OXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOX
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
x x X x x x X x x X
VXVX~X~XNXNXNX~X~XOXO
OXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOX
qx~x~x~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
~X~X~X~XoXroX~X~X~X~X
~X~X~X~X~X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X
XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOX
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
~XNX~X~X~XOX~XvX~XroX~
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
~X~X~X~X~X~XOXOXOXOXO
X X X X X X g X X X
X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
x X x X X X X X X x
OX~xvX~XroX~XNX~X~X~XO
~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~X~
~XvXVXvXvXvXVXVX~X~X~
X X X X X.X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X
0::
I-()
< ~
O~
<.90
>...J
<{LL
~<{
052
...J II
LLO
<{o::
WW
o::~
<{u:
00
~~
I <.9
Cl
>
ro
...J
x
ro
E
...J
.
6'
~
l-
LL
o
0::
o
I-
()
<(
LL
>-
I-
W
LL
<(
C/)
I
I-
~
C/)
0::
:J
0,0, 0
~~ I
xx ~
bb II
NN
~~ C/)
II II 0::
roro :J
W- ~~ ~
<(<(
::::E -- ~
_:J W ffi ffi ~
W...J a. > > Z
::::EO> a:: Q) Q) I~
:J .......... 1-0
...JI-LLroro
o Z 0 .S oS ~ ~
>WW ~ ~ ll!~>
I-::::EZ.......... ~
ZI-::::i frfr Z_O
W<{o::
::::EWW<{<{ <(0
I- 0:: I- 0::0 I-
<{I-Z
WLLW,,"":,_ O::::::E
O::O()~~ WW
I-::::ELL-~ ~t;
~}2~~~ :J>-
a.I-OOZ oC/)
00j::@@ ~g5
I-CO<{ -LL
;;::;> <( <{ e: ~ :J W
>>wWWoE-E=O"""
...J>...JO::O:: ~W~
OZW<{<(...J...J= 0::1-
o~~OONNNli)ro
oc<5Nroro VN 0
LC.i c<5gg LC.iN~
~~
. YACHT BASIN
.
.
9/18101
Side Drain Filter Drawdown Analysis 01
Peak tidal influence = 2.5 ft.
therefore
to maintain 0.5' of freeboard, the elevation of the centerline of pipe = 3.25 ft
bottom of treatment volume = 3.70' proposed top of treatment volume = 5.00'
By using 225 If of pipe, drawdown can be achieved in 34.8 hour < 36 hours
J
, YACHT BASIN
.
.
9/18/01
Design Data -
Total Area = 6.165 acres
For underground vault system, must treat the first W' of runoff
6.165 ac. x
43560 s.f. x
ac
0.75 in. x
f.t.
12 in.
16781 of
design to 17000 cf
The filter - drain system must drawdown this volume within 72 hours.
For design purposes a safety factor of2 was used.
Thus, the system must drawdown the appropriate volume within 36 hours.
Executive Summary -
The criteria for this project calls for treatment only (no attenuation, due to the project location) since
discharge would be to outstanding Florida Waters and the proposed treatment method is filtration. The
requirement is for treatment of the first 3/4" ofrunoff(150% of 1/2" due to O.F.W. discharge).
Two alternate analysis have been run, depending on the design high water to be used for final design.
The last sheet of this report shows that the retention area provided in the plan is adequate for either
alternate.
At this time no attempt has been made to balance the split of the contributing areas to match the size of
the vaults(s) at the NW and SE. Final design will ensure that the area draining to each vault is stated,
and each vault designed separately, or properly interconnected.
A design storm event exceeding the capacity of the vault system will overflow the proposed control
structure and be discharged to the Bay. The outfall pipes shall be designed to handle the anticipated
runoff from a 25-year storm event.
1C /04/2001 THU 11: 38 FAX 727 724 8606 FDe C:.earwater
.
f4J 001/003
~
.
. -\,..... ',11
_ - ," _>,:.~i:'
FLORIDA DESIGN CON$ULrANrS,-'H~,
&to/1iEEJiCS, ElMlfOWiI~ liUJMm)ftS" ~
FAX
,...-
To: I--I~ rl-f. /~ V
Fax: ~~2 - '-IS7~
.~\I
Phone:
From: ()daIlL7J {JJ.--hrt' ~
Pages: ..3
Datemrae: I 0 -If - .tJ I
Re:
cC:
JQb No:
Hardcopy Instnlctions:
o Regqlar Mail D Overnight Mall 0 None To Foftow
. Comments:
~
The Wormation COf.laIlOd tl illS 1I'anSml$sIon IS pcMeged and canfidenliaI. Ills klterxIed for the use DC tha hHdualot entity
named ebow.. If the reader cf tis message Is not the kIlendecI acfdreGsee. Ile reader 16 hereby notified \hat my consIdcrallon,
dissemlnallon ex' ~ d tB axnmUl'llcalion ~ strk:lIy prohlblted. If 1M rec/plent ha$1ec:eIved this commuricalicn k-a encr.
please relr.m tis transmission 10 us at the address bdowby mal Ifflis c:ommtnication was receMld In the U.S., pklase notify us
lmmeclatoly by phone.
lHANKYOUl
2G39 McCormlct DrilM - Ooarwa\er. FbncIa
PhonQ: (127) 7~--a422. - Fax: (727) 724-MOO
1(:04/2:01 THU 11: 38 FAX 72ii4 8606 FDe C:.earwater
141 002/003
.
MEMO
TO:
Lisa Fierce, City of Clearwater - Development Review
FROM:
Ckmvio Cabrera, P.E. C!E-
DAlE:
<:ktober4, 200 1
RE:
Catalina. Preliminary Site Plan - Additional Information
Project. No. 997-103
Enclosed is the existing information requested by Marl<: Parry during our meetmg of 10/2/01, as
follows:
hnpenneable surface ratio (lSR) ...............................................................
0.56
Number of existing apartlnent units..",... ,., ..................................... ..........
202 units
Building Height Typical2-story apartment ..............................................
Typical 3-story apartnumt."... ..... ...................................
19.4 ft.
29.0 ft.
Parking Ratio.,... ......................... ......................... ................ ...........,...........
118 spa
0.58 spa/unit
paJ"ki.rlg ... ........ .... ..... ................... ........... ~ ~.l~ (. H.)... H) ,. () I' ......... .................................................
Mark had additionally requested existing and future assessed value of the property. The
Pinellas County Property Appraiser's webpagc lists the existing (2001) assessed value as
$6,828,800. We estimate the assessed value of the proposed CATALINA project to be
$85,000,000.00, when completed.
We are awaiting receipt of the Landscape Architect's portion to complete our Project Narrative.
Other items requested at our Tuesday meeting shall be provided directly by the architect.
Those items are:
1. Amended Beach-by-design dO~lffient.
lC /04120.01 THU 11: 38 FAX 72~4 8606 FDC Cearwater
!4l 003/003
.
2. Revised building elevations, showing adjacent pTOperties,
3. Architect's Project Narrative.
Thanks for your efforts in this sufficiency review of the original submittal.
cc: Mark Parry, City of Clearwater
Ed Armstrong, Johnson, Blakely
Ed Mazur, Jr., FDC
T:\car.nlina preliminary site plan. doc
Page 2
'i"~',.~' . ,""\ ~.:.,.
~::!iftlt~ ~.. '.
." '.;iv4;.a~j",~.~" ~~, ',' -,'
4 ...~..,..J.t:......,.~
.'
..............;::\-~~.:.,.. ....
....
.,.,.",
~"..
... "'l,:r-.
,.1
...
:- .... .' ~ ..... '"
... ......., =.......,. :"
_~!,......." tIit,,_...~ ..
.~: ..... ..; ....,.,-.-.
~.!
. ......... .
...
.,
....
~" '.~
.:-..i ~v
~ .....(~k--:- __ ~
_ .. ......0 ."..~;...,", .rl....
. ,".. .
.-v-
fIl:~
'~..J-
~ >
--~"_.,,.;r,..cf.~, .~..
~'~.~.
-I. ,," .'_ ...: _#-_._V..~.
_ "1.......... .; ;..;1" ~.. ~ .,.
.. ." - ~
i
1;'4
;.~l"
;.:..
...
. "
. . .
, .. ..... .
T
..
~:. :.
..
. ,
.... .
- '!'- ~r .}
...
~
.'.....~-
{.. ~..:. M ;",.
. '1,,- . 'f.r:l"~ ~
..~ ... ~- f
;,.".
.,,,~~';"'"
.....
~~~:;~.\ "
-,.~;\",;ft;~ '
. .' .~~'- .' '~~~t
~ \t~
~..-
}.
,...
J~ .t, ... ~l;l
;.~
'''!
.
.
- ....
_.. - _-:;....__ - I
Introduction
The spotlight of innovation and character can now focus on a truly magnificent
site important to the statement of character for future North Beach improvements
and essential in setting the style and ambiance for resort residences.
Walk or drive along an exciting entry that is inclusive and relaxed to the
streetscape with garden and waterfront image and carefully balanced buildings,
passages, loggias and a village green. This will be a landmark quality experience
for Clearwater Beach community and resort residences.
.
e)
\ ~\;
CA~
'~ 1'1, :1)Vr
))~ !@.I//{ilEt?H RESOR} RESID~GES
l ~ <{ \' ~ ( \. ~jj,k) n \ ~~~
ffi:~~ \:~l).~ ~\trt~\\'
Mandalay Avenue at the Yacht Basin
Essential components that make it enduring:
Sense of harmony and compatibility with locale and Mandalay / North Beach,
particularly with scale that relates to human form, like narrow entrances and
passages leading to beautiful gardens and intriguing small resort spaces. Roof
forms that step and turn to accent the penthouses and defme the entire resort.
View from Mandalay A venue
.
.
Index
I. Introduction
II. Concept Manifestation
a. Model photographs with notes
b. Urban context map with notes
III. Site Plans
a. Illustrative site plan with notes and Program
c. Building types and amenities
d. Pedestrian & open space linkage & context
e. Component detail
IV. Images
a. Elevations
b. Character sketches
V. Documentation
a. Typology of buildings, open spaces & mass
b. Building heights, mass, stepback and scale calculations
c. Comparative building heights
d. Appropriateness of proposed uses and design relative to Clearwater
Beach, linkage to Mandalay, waterfront and North Beach
VI. Summary
View of Resort Green
00:-
8 3
If\
.
.
Program
t;;';:~~~
26 Unique Residences,
1300 to 1600 SF, garden .
access, loggia and
waterfront views
LOGGIA
Chic Village Resort Residences
.
"'.i~~
".. .>.,~'.~'-1
...~-'-i<.-. .
~ll: li
62 Residences,
1800 to 2450 SF, with terraces.
and gardens, courtyard
Beach and
waterfront views
PASSAGE
Courtyard Garden Residences
Mid Rise
.
c .
98 Residence Townhomes,
2080 to 2650 SF, Penthouses
2950 to 3450 SF, Gulf . MARBELLA .
and/or Bay views Penthousesrrownhomes
Bay and Gulf
16 Residences,
1780 to 2250 SF,
waterfront units, with . BELLASERA
Marina & Bay views .
Waterlodge
.
THE FOUNTAIN
Resident Exclusive
Waterfeature Fitness
.
5,000 SF fitness/retreat program
garden areas
.
MOORINGS
.
~~
~~
~
75 slips
.
Waterfront club
Catering service
Guest amenities
RegisUy gatehouse
Concierge, charter srvices,
Pools, Terraces
Samll garden spaces,
Enby lobbies & portocechere
405 space parking garage
enclosed, Secure and obscured
from street or waterview, .
Loading and trash spaces
Program
.
ANCHOR
.
RESORT
SERVICES
.
.
.
'". .'~
'~-'...J," (
.' :~
,'/'1;~
v~\L. _..
. -fffi
'V
~~ !
..-.--f-....-,q..~.~.. >1 I ':.' ....,-t
.
l'IIII;TO;'" "':111
.: *'":.4"
- - .........--.--....~-
-.
Stepped penthouse and facade
variation accented by resort
quality waterfeatur~ pools.
On the waterfront with exciting
profile enhances vista from
causeway. .. ,..
~ j.-...,
Significant open ~p~~~e;. .
Mandalay Square:s.ets the
character that.blerip~!he
'....... ....
building profile witJ1:JJ\e .,~ ~
community and foms a
visual gate to North Beach.
,
...
..
......". fz~
......
...~... -~"',.'
.
1~ - - .'
~-.>-~':r l
~......~..,,~. ""\ -- ~ - -:t
~i~;r;~~
w~
;t..1: i:
~., .
..~..
i ~
,~t...tl,r
"'= ii~ 'jp
'.",
--
-
--
',ii.
~,-
:~~~-
j""""",~,
~'-.""..:c--~+~
'.
!--
--
!
- -
-"
-
~~)>;.
~,'
t ,.,...-.
-
..
~.~i
.~ .
.. .
};"T:~~~.
'!P: ..
'lJ . ..
~..r
I ~. ~ .
~ ~.I;:
~~.~ ;
.....
.
",
t< ~
'!'.'
. ~ ~~~~. ~.~
~,~i .,:~
-
CITY OF
C L 'R W ATE R
November 27, 2001.
Armstrong - Page Two
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OffICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FI.ORIOA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAl, SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLF.....RWATF.R, FLORIDA 33756
THEPHONE (727) 562.4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
The proposal includes the complete redevelopment of the site including the demolition of
the existing 202 units. The project includes a ZOO-unit condominium project with on-site
amenities and abundant landscaping. There will be 98 units within the 130-foot North
Villa and 62 units in the 99-foot Midrise Villa. The remaining 40 units will be located in
the tWQ- and three-story townhomes located along the perimeter of the site. The proposal
also includes streetscape improvements along Mandalay Avenue and Baymant Street.
LONG R\NGF. PI.ANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
HOUSING DIVISION
NEIGHBORHOOO SF.RVlCES
November 27, 2001
ILE
Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Community Development
Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Mr. E.D. Armstrong, III, Esquire F
Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Ruppel & Bum
PO Box 1368
Clearwater, Florida 33756-1368
Bases for approval:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.6 of the
Community Development Code. On November 13, 2001, the Community Development
Board reviewed your Flexible Development request to permit the following within the
(pending) HDR, High Density Residential District, as part of a Residential Infill Project
under the provisions of Section 2-504:
1. The proposal, as amended with respect to height, complies with Flexible
Development and Residential Infill Project criteria under the provisions of Section 2-
504;
2. The project, as amended, complies with General Applicability Criteria under the
provisions of Section 3-913;
3. The plan, as amended, complies with the Termination of Status as a Nonconformity
under the provisions of Section 6-109 B; and
4. The proposed development, as amended, is consistent with the companion
amendments to Beach by Design and the rezoning application for HDR District.
RE: Development Order regarding \..<lM; J..I..J VJ. v-' ....1 ... jOt JAandaJay Avenue
Dear Mr. Armstrong:
Conditions of aooroval:
Increase in the number of dwelling units from 184 to 200 units under the provisions
of Section 6-109 B, as a Termination of Status as a Nonconformity;
Increase the permitted height of the North Villa (north portion of the site) from 30 feet
to 130 feet;
Increase the height of the Midrise Villa (south portion of the site) from 30 feet to 99
feet;
Reduction in the side (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement;
Reduction in the side (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement;
Reduction in the front (west) setback along Mandalay A venue from 25 feet to zero
feet to pavement;
Reduction in the front (south) setback along Baymont Street from 25 feet to 18 feet
for building; and
. Reduction in the front (south) setback along Baymont Street from 25 feet to zero feet
for pavement.
1. That the companion Beach by Design Special Area Plan and reroning amendments be
approved by the City Commission;
2. That the density be limited to 200 dwellings units;
3. That a contribution to a future parking garage in the area be made, as determined by
the City Commission;
4. That the streetscape improvements be installed within two phases: Phase One
includes the area along Mandalay Avenue north of the entrance of the site, to be
completed prior to the issuance of the last Certificate of Occupancy for the North
Villa; Phase Two includes the Baymont Street frontage and the balance of Mandalay
Avenue (south of the entrance), to be installed prior to the issuance of the last
Certificate of Occupancy of the Midrise Villa;
5. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
6. That solid waste and stormwater management requirements to be met, prior to
issuance of building permits;
7. That a setback reduction for all structures including swimming pools, spas and
pavement along the seawall be secured through application to the Board of
Adjustment and Appeal for Building and Flood, as necessary, prior to issuance of
building permits;
BRIAN J. AIIK(;ST. MA\"O~.COMMISSIONEK
~(l)~.A~~.\~:;;_~'I~~::.:~~;:~~:~~~'::~ lNE~ WI~:~I.~)~;:'~: ~::~:~::~::;~::
*
'.EQljAI. EMIHIYMENT ANn AI'I'IIlMA"IlVE ACTION EMPIDWII'.
November 27, 2001
Armstrong - Page Three
Conditions of aoorovaJ (continued):
8. That all signage comply with Code; and
9. That any future dock request meet Code requirements including review by CDB under
a separate application.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one
year of Flexible Development approval (November 13, 2(02) and all required certificates
of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building
permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community
Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year
and only within the original period of validity.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the
necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In
order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please
bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require
this prior development approval.
In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible
Development) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the
subject of the approval within 14 days of the date the Development Order is issued. The
filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the
final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on November
30, 200 I.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 562-4558.
p-
~~'
Gerald Figurski, Chairman
Community Development Board
ce. Mr. David Mack, Greenmack Clearwater,LLC
S:\P/tlIl1ling D(parlmt!Ilf\C D l1\FluN"n(Jclivt! (JT Fil1is/l(d Applk(Jfi{m~W(Jl1dcdQ)l501 C(Jw/iI1Q Tuwllho",es. Appmvt!d\Mandal/lY
50IDEVEWPMENTORDER.dor
..
. .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
HOUSING DMSION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIWING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
April 26, 2002
Mr. Tim Johnson, Esquire
Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Ruppel & Bums, P.A.
PO Box 1368
Clearwater, Florida 33756-1368
RE: Time Extension process regarding case FL 01-09-31 at 501 Mandalay Avenue
Dear Mr. Johnson:
This letter is in response to your request for information about time extension requests as
it relates to the abovementioned application. On November 13, 2001, the Community
Development Board approved with conditions the Flexible Development application
which includes the complete redevelopment of the site with a 200-unit condominium
project. Under the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code,
an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (November 13, 2002) and all required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time
frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may
grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original
period of validity. This means that any time extension request must be submitted to the
Planning Department prior to November 13, 2002. It will be forwarded to the CDB for
review at its next regularly scheduled meeting. Such requests are required as a matter of
procedure, and as long as you can provide some rationale for the request, the Board is
likely to grant approval.
ns, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4561.
cc. file copy
S:\Planning Departlllent\C D B\FlexVnnactive or Finished Applications\Mandalay 501 Catalina Town/Willes -
Approved\Mandalay 501 letter re time extension process.doc
BRLAJ\.J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIO~:ER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-CO\lMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, CmIMISSIO;\,ER
HOYT HAMILTOf', CO\lMISSIOf'ER @ BII.LjOf'SON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
e
CDB Meeting Date: November 13, 2001
Case Number: FL 01-09-31
Agenda Item: D1
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC
REPRESENTATIVE:
B.D. Armstrong, III, Esquire (Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Ruppel &
Bums, P.A.)
LOCATION:
501 Mandalay Avenue
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to permit the following within the
(pending) HDR, High Density Residential District, as part of a
Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-504:
. Increase in the number of dwelling units from 184 to 200
units under the provisions of Section 6-109 B, as a
Termination of Status as a Nonconformity;
. Increase the permitted height of the North Villa (north
portion of the site) from 30 feet to 130 feet;
. Increase the height of the Midrise Villa (south portion of
the site) from 30 feet to 99 feet;
. Reduction in the side (east) setback from 15 feet to zero
feet to pavement;
. Reduction in the side (north) setback from 15 feet to zero
feet to pavement;
. Reduction in the front (west) setback along Mandalay
Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet to pavement;
. Reduction in the front (south) setback along Baymont
Street from 25 feet to 18 feet for building; and
. Reduction in the front (south) setback along Baymont
Street from 25 feet to zero feet for pavement.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plans and architectural elevations submitted by Gillett
Associates ARDT Group, Incorporated
Landscape plans submitted by Phil Graham & Company, P.A
Page 1
e
e
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
6.164 acres; 268,504 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
547 feet of width by 572 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Attached dwellings (202 units)
Attached dwellings (200 units)
PLAN CATEGORY:
RH, Residential High Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
HDR, High Density Residential District (pending) - Refer to
companion case Z 01-09-03
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
West: Attached dwellings
East: Attached dwellings
South: Clearwater Bay
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: High-density residential, overnight accommodation and assorted
marina and other non-residential uses dominate the immediate
vicinity.
ANALYSIS:
Background
The rectangular site is 6.16 acres located on the northeast comer of Mandalay Avenue and
Baymont Street. It has been developed with 202 residential dwelling units within eight buildings
known as the Yacht Basin apartment complex. The development was built between 1948 and
1949 with an office added in 1981. All existing structures will be razed as part of the
redevelopment of the site. The site is located within a redeveloping portion of Clearwater Beach
located directly along Clearwater Bay. Overnight accommodation establishments, restaurants,
public parks and other assorted, non-residential uses define the area.
Beach by Design Plan (as proposed under separate application)
The site is located within the Marina Residential District of the Beach by Design Special Area
Plan. The Plan, adopted in July 2001, governs the redevelopment of Clearwater Beach. A
companion amendment to Beach by Design is under review by the Community Development
Board, concurrent with this site plan application and separate rezoning request. The Beach by
Design amendment provides revisions for the district as a whole including a focus on water-
oriented uses, lot consolidation, developer requirements and alternative building heights. The
project complies with the proposed amendments to Beach by Design.
Page 2
e
e
The subject site under discussion is located in the north end of the district. The specific Beach by
Design amendments applicable to this property include building height permitted up to the
maximum of the HDR zoning district (130 feet), conditioned on the following:
. Approval by the Community Development Board;
. Townhome development on the perimeter of the property;
. Higher buildings with "stepped back" design on the interior of the property;
. Streetscape improvements along Baymont Street and Mandalay Avenue;
. Contribution toward the construction of a future parking garage in the area, as
determined by the City Commission;
. No subdivision of the subject property.
The Board is reviewing the amendments to Beach by Design and a rezoning application of the
site to HDR District in two companion requests. (Refer to cases Z 01-09-03 and Amendment to
Beach by Design Special Area Plan.) The Commission will review the recommendations of the
Board for the zoning and area plan amendment ordinances at its November 15, 2001 meeting.
The second reading of the ordinances are scheduled for December 13,2001.
Redevelopment Proposal
The proposal includes the complete redevelopment of the site. All existing buildings will be
razed and replaced with a 200-unit condominium. There will be 98 units within the North Villa
and 62 units in the Midrise Villa. The remaining 40 units will be located in the two- and three-
story townhomes located along the perimeter of the site. The proposed height of the North Villa
is 130 feet and the Midrise Villa will be 99 feet in height. There will be low-rise townhouse
units at the base ofthe Midrise Villa.
Parking will be located under the proposed buildings with 403 spaces. This exceeds Code by
doubling the required number of spaces. Access to the site is proposed via a single ingress/egress
point along Mandalay Avenue. The two existing access points on Baymont Street will be closed.
A multi-use dock may be provided along the east and north property lines as part of a future
application to be reviewed by the Community Development Board.
The contemporary, Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco,
terracotta barrel tile roofs, and a significant number of windows and balconies on all elevations.
The main entrance along Mandalay Avenue will be enhanced with an obelisk sculpture and water
features on the ground level. The proposed landscaping will exceed the intent of Code and will
include palms, flowering trees shrubs and ground covers providing interest throughout the year.
Planters will be located throughout the project on different levels of the development. A village
green boulevard is proposed along the main entry with a landscaped median. All sight triangles
will be honored providing unblocked views to the water from adjacent sites as required by Code.
Amenities will be located throughout the site and include swimming pools, hot tubs, a sun deck
and a tennis court. Any structures located within 18 feet of the seawall will require a variance
Page 3
e
e
through the City's Board of Adjustment and Appeal for Building and Flood, prior to the issuance
of any building permits. All proposed signage will need to meet current Code requirements.
All stormwater runoff will be collected by floor/yard drains and interconnecting pipes.
Underground vaults will be used for treatment, as required by Code. Adequate water and sewer
utilities will be available to serve the project. Solid waste requirements will be met including
the use of refuse chutes and roll-off containers.
Flexible Development Requests
The proposal is a request for Flexible Development approval to increase the number of dwelling
units from 184 to 200 units under the provisions of Section 6-109 B, as a Termination of Status
as a Nonconformity. Nonconforming uses with respect to density may be reconstructed on the
same parcel with the same density through a Level Two application. In this case, the permitted
density on the site is 184 dwelling units. The existing density is 202 dwelling units. The
proposal includes the reuse of 200 of those units within an overall redevelopment of the site.
Other Flexible Development requests included in this application relate to the design of the site.
They consist of height and setback relief under the (pending) HDR District provisions of the
Code, as part of a Residential Infill Project (Section 2-504). Specifically, they include: an
increase in the permitted height of the North Villa (north portion of the site) from 30 feet to 130
feet, increase in the height of the Midrise Villa (south portion of the site) from 30 feet to 99 feet,
a reduction in the side (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement, reduction in the side
(north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement, reduce the front (west) setback along
Mandalay Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet to pavement, reduce the front (south) setback along
Baymont Street from, 25 feet to 18 feet for building and to reduce the front (south) setback along
Baymont Street from 25 feet to zero feet for pavement. The Residential Infill Project use
provides for flexibility with regard to setback and height for projects that are innovative, do not
conform to typical development forms, and are beneficial to the City as a whole.
The proposal also meets the specific design criteria outlined in Beach by Design. Specifically,
the proposal is in scale with the character and function of Clearwater Beach and does not exceed
the capacity of public infrastructure. The proposal also maintains and promotes the distinctive
character of Clearwater Beach through the use of a contemporary, Mediterranean architecture for
all proposed buildings. A 100- foot distance between towers will prevent a "walling off' effect of
the Intracoastal Waterway. The proposal also includes lower, two-story buildings along the site
perimeter promoting a diversity of mass, scale and height. Neither tower will be closer that 75
feet to any publicly used area. This, in combination with generous sidewalks between 15 and 20
feet in width and other pedestrian-oriented spaces along all street frontages, ensures a pedestrian-
friendly experience. Extensive landscaping will be provided along all street frontages and
throughout the site reinforcing the tropical vernacular established by the architecture of the
buildings. All parking areas will be located underneath the buildings and will be completely
hidden from view.
The applicant has also proposed a contribution to the future construction of parking garage in the
area. Funding options and timing of payment will be determined by the City Commission.
Page 4
e
e
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding Code violations associated with this site.
A.
COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD
IN THE (PENDING) HDR, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-
501. 1.):
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 30 dwelling units 202 units 200 units No*
per acres (184
units)
IMPERVIOUS 0.85 0.56 0.83 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO
*
The application includes a termination of Status as a Nonconformity under the provisions
of Section 6-109 B that will enable the site to maintain existing density.
Page 5
e
e
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL
PROJECTS IN THE (PENDING) HDR, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(Section 2-504):
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 6.164 acres; 6.164 acres; Yes
268,504 square 268,504 square
feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 547 feet 547 feet Yes
HEIGHT 30 - 130 feet 19 - 29 feet 130 feet Yes
FRONT YARD 10 - 25 feet South (Baymont South (Baymont Yes*
SETBACK Street): 9.8 feet Street): zero feet
- to building - to pavement;
West (Manda1ay 18 feet to
Avenue) 25 feet building
- to building West (Manda1ay
Avenue) 0 feet -
to pavement
SIDE YARD o - 10 feet East: zero feet to East: zero feet to Yes
SETBACK pavement pavement
North: zero feet North: zero feet
to pavement to pavement
REAR YARD 0-15 feet N/A** N/A** N/A**
SETBACK
PARKING 1 space per 0.58 spaces per 2.03 spaces per Yes
SPACES dwelling unit dwelling unit dwelling unit
(200 spaces) (118 spaces) (405 spaces)
*
The development standards for Residential Infill Projects are guidelines and may be
varied based on the criteria specified in Section 2-504(F).
Comer lots have only front and side setbacks under the provisions of Section 3-903.
**
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR ATTACHED DWELLINGS IN THE (PENDING)
HDR, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-504):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and other development
standards;
The proposed project height is allowed in the HDR zoning district. The proposed
setbacks for both the structures and pedestrian areas create an improved design and will
serve to upgrade the character of the surrounding area. The request for Termination of
Status as a Nonconformity allows the retention and reconstruction of the existing units.
Page 6
e
e
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential in fill
project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposed variations from Code are consistent with the character of the neighborhood
and the Mandalay Avenue street improvements. The proposed complex will likely
enhance property values in the area with the proposed landscape improvements,
architecture and overall site design. The current assessed valuation of the site is
$6,828,800. With the redevelopment proposal, the assessed valuation is projected at
$85,000,000. This increase in property value is expected to have a beneficial effect on
surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the residential in fill project are otherwise permitted in the district;
The proposal includes the reuse of the site with attached dwelling units that are permitted
in the (proposed) HDR, High Density Residential District. The land use designation is
currently Residential High Classification and will not change with this application.
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly high-density residential, overnight
accommodations and assorted marina and other non-residential uses. Many of the
structures in the area are low- to mid-rise. The Clearwater Hotel across Mandalay Avenue
to the west is approximately 75 feet in height. The proposed condominium complex is
specifically geared to take advantage of the views of the waterfront along Clearwater Bay.
This location provides a unique opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Bay that
is currently underutilized.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential in fill
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The architecture and amenities will enhance the area. The proposed
condominium complex is specifically geared to take advantage of the views of the
waterfront and Clearwater Bay. This location provides a unique opportunity to redevelop
a portion of Clearwater Beach that is currently underutilized.
6. The design of the proposed residential in fill project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of Clearwater
Beach. The proposed development will play an important role in its continuing
revitalization. The City will benefit by having an attractive residential complex located in
a redeveloping area. The complete redevelopment of the site with the proposed
condominium buildings and landscape enhancements as revised will significantly
Page 7
e
e
improve the site. This project will also serve to "anchor" and provide additional market
for the Mandalay retail corridor.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking,
access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community
character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and
the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The neighborhood consists of high-density residential, overnight accommodation and
assorted marina and other non-residential uses. The proposal includes a use consistent
with the neighborhood. The proposed development includes an attractive building that
will raise the standards in the area and should encourage other high quality development.
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole. The setback reductions to pavement are consistent with other structures in the
area and with Beach by Design Plan recommendations. The proposed streetscape along
Baymont Street and Mandalay Avenues is consistent with the proposed, City-sponsored
Mandalay Avenue improvements.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized by a mixture of residential and non-residential uses. This
proposal includes a high quality residential complex with amenities. It will continue a
positive redevelopment pattern for the area. The two villas will be located approximately
70 feet from any property line. This wi11lessen their visual impact on surrounding areas.
The narrow sides of the towers are oriented towards the water and a liberal east/west view
corridor is provided between the towers.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The proposed use is compatible with the proposed zoning ofHDR District. The design of
the site will include an attractive development with preserved sight views to the water.
The project is in keeping with the proposed recommendations of Beach by Design as
amended.
Page 8
e
e
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development includes a minor reduction in the number of dwelling units.
The project will have a single ingress/egress point along Mandalay Avenue. Vehicle trip
generation will not have any significant impact on affected intersections or roadways,
with no reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate
vicinity with regard to setbacks. See previous comments in Section C. 7 and D.1 of this
report.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the redevelopment of a residential site with 200 dwelling units.
This includes a reduction in number of units by two. No adverse effects are anticipated
with this proposal. All required view triangles will be provided. Parking in excess of
Code requirements will be provided. A landscape plan has been submitted as part of the
proposal which exceeds the intent of Code.
F. Termination of status as a nonconformity (Section 6-109):
1. A structure which is nonconforming with respect to density may be reconstructed
on the same parcel with the same density provided such reconstruction complies
with all other requirements of this Community Development Code.
The proposal includes a Residential Infill Project for which all required criteria have been
addressed. The site currently contains 202 dwelling units. The maximum density
permitted under the RH, Residential High (land use) Category is 184 dwelling units. This
proposal includes a request to maintain 200 of the existing 202 units. Landscaping,
signage, parking and buffer improvements are required to take advantage of the
Termination of Nonconformity. Landscaping, perimeter buffers, signs and off-street
parking have been evaluated and will significantly improve the site and meet or exceed
Code.
Page 9
e
e
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
in October, 2001. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development application to permit an increase in the number of dwelling units from 184 to 200
units under the provisions of Section 6-109 B, as a Termination of Status as a Nonconformity,
increase the permitted height of the North Villa (north portion of the site) from 30 feet to 130
feet, increase the height of the Midrise Villa (south portion of the site) from 30 feet to 99 feet,
reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement, reduce the side (north)
setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement, reduce the front (west) setback along Mandalay
Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet to pavement, reduce the front (south) setback along Baymont
Street from, 25 feet to 18 feet for building and to reduce the front (south) setback along Baymont
Street from 25 feet to zero feet for pavement within the (pending) HDR, High Density
Residential District, for the site at 501 Mandalay Avenue, with the following bases and subject to
the following conditions:
Bases for approval:
1. The proposal, as amended with respect to height, complies with Flexible Development and
Residential Infill Project criteria under the provisions of Section 2-504;
2. The project, as amended, complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions
of Section 3-913;
3. The plan, as amended, complies with the Termination of Status as a Nonconformity under the
provisions of Section 6-109 B; and
4. The proposed development, as amended, is consistent with the companion amendments to
Beach by Design and the rezoning application for HDR District.
Conditions:
1. That the companion Beach by Design Special Area Plan and rezoning amendments be
approved by the City Commission;
2. That the density be limited to 200 dwellings units;
3. That a contribution to a future parking garage in the area be made, as determined by the City
Commission;
4. That the streetscape improvements along Baymont Street and Mandalay Avenue be installed
prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy;
5. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
or as modified by the CDB;
6. That solid waste and stormwater management requirements to be met, prior to issuance of
building permits;
7. That a setback reduction for all structures including swimming pools, spas and pavement
along the seawall be secured through application to the Board of Adjustment and Appeal for
Building and Flood, as necessary, prior to issuance of building permits;
8. That all signage comply with Code; and
9. That any future dock request meet Code requirements including review by CDB under a
separate application.
Page 10
.
.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslReviewed and PendinglMandalay 501 Catalina TownhomeslMandalay 501 STAFF
REPORT FINAL CDB VERSJON.docS:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFlexlPending caseslUp for the next DRCIMandalay 501 Catalina
TownhomeslMandalay 501 STAFF REPOR T. doc
Page 11
~
NORTH
1"=1320'
.ocation Map
Greenmack Clearwate1; LLC
501 Mandalay A venue
FL 01-09-31
.
~
a;
l3
:2
:2
<t:
(0
'"
0;
'"
0;
o
0* ~U
~ GARDENIA ST:ii
s9 n~D D~i
D""~ VERBENA
tfDD
~DMANG[4O 0 SOT ~
(r '"
o ~
~ 0Q;- fh
~~\Y1 g 4J
l>uO"" ':ilJ15 IRI"
<i"E:i1f;O->-
"( ~
~De(
ACACIA ST
SOMERSET ~
~D
"
z
o
"
~
"
DR
Q
....
~
A
J:
~
'"
a,
CI
;;
co
<II
:>
1:>
s::
..
""
SRIGHTWATfR DR
BAYSIDE
J:
~
<II
:>
1:>
0=
..
~
<II
1)
co
'0
a::
1:>
0=
..
~
w
1/'11"""....,
.,I~!?>EA~-__ CITY OF CLEARWATER, nORlDA
~\ O~dl/ -:1 ~
%.~ ',_: ~-:.~ PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
\~...\ --- 9:'/
""-~t ~..9,,1
---__,,~,;,II" ENGINEERING
2\ ~ ~:,\I y 577'~ )~ ~,i:-i\ "l" \ , \ 579:11:1 574
~
~ l-\::/ '''T '" 3 '- '" ~ :p7 -'\." \ 55?-J~ , ~8566
15 14 13 m 11 10 n\: 1602 ~~ 6
1 T\
u '" P:: l--;O:
;:: 22 '" ~ 571 4 r "" " 60\ 2 f5] ~ 1 9 \
15 ~ I 60 to
0 ---
<D
ro
~
0::
o
I
U
<(
W
CD
FIRE STATION
. (2) #45~4 I
MANDALA Y
PARK
RES. 8/1/55
40 ;:: ROCKAWAY ~ STREET
-.II '<;'
40 MILl ERS ~
2 3 4
REPL I\T
.,.
'"
0'"
<(ci
>",
o
c--
1 8
2SW,P"~'1
~
\ VAe. ox 22 - 19
40
.,.
'"
N
'0
C5
CLEARWATER
BEACH RESUB
19-96
o
o
0.
$30
NO .os
~ . 77
Voc 0.8. 1417 P . 134
~ 50 56 58 57 I 80
~ 0 495 55 59
Sma ~ 54
~4 III 53 60490
61
S- 489 52 62
~ - ~ 51
e! _ W 63 484
u -S; 50
~ - u.. L o.L.i- 49- ~-==--
::;; _ ....J In---- 65
a. ::l r-=:;: -=-48 66
~ - 0' ~.~ .147 ti!67T
~ - ~6":~ IT-'
o iO':Z ~5f~
~ j 50 ~I
a
tii
~
"0
M
m
<;>
;;
'"
'"
OJ
"0
~ OWNER:
"
"0
~ SITE:
"0
c:
III
i:)
'"
ti
'"
'0
a:
"0
c:
III
;:,!
W
532
':i.
'" LA SAL
'" MOTEL530
5 CONDO
97-55
524
7522
520
516
I'CR ST2
500
/j
on
<D
BAYMONT
\
~
~
499 45 ~
/495~44
43 ~
42.,-
~~41
\"U....l 40
483,..:'39
38 <i1
37
36~
35~
34
I 33.;:c:;
60
,
4
100
IjA ~~.
531 ;;:. .:;
to
"
o
<D
0)
'"
0.8. 715-323
CLEARWA TER BEACH REC. COMPLEX
w
>
<(
OS/R
,,-
33/01
,
Q.e.D. No, 706~387
0.8 57-195
-
>-
<(
...J
<(
o
z
<(
:::iE
p
~
d~
~
"""I
TIes IS NOT A I
SURVEY
8
7
6
5
~VlI- D R
100
y AI~HT
SUB
BASIN
501
3 4
25 -35
STREET 8
;;: ;;' ;;' ;;; ';;/ 60 l':;i;mf;;~(Qi21 60
.l.---. 1
I W 489 l 492 483
~ ::l 487 12 ~
r3~ ~ 485/ /3 490 ~
<1' <( ;/14 W
<0 ~ 4 479 484 0::
~~ <( 477 I 0 479
~5 5 e '1/5~80 ~
"" ...... W f-
~6!:Q 6 C/) ~
470 i5 475 ~ 475 5 C\}
~ 7 I Q I ~ I 147.1 I I
CORAL
- __ MOTEL
CONDO
42-114
-- SUN
--- HARBOR
CONDO
76-90
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC CASE: FL 01-09-31
PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES): 6.16
501 Mandalay Avenue
PIN: OS/29/15/99216/000/0010
ATLAS 267A
PAGE:
tiN/ ~ t7;~ftr;J
4 CO ~617~
~ ~1~B2\.'ffJE2
~~ 5163
'i ---f!:-- .> 50 '--' ~
:!1 8 ~ f--.- 49 ~
~ 1o---J ~ ~~
~ iF1 :[~-~~r ::-T1[f~ 6:i ~~
~1J-1 44 70
~ ----.J 43
2: ARea ....~ 71
0;
~
BAYMONT .,.~.A)~ ~rJh ~ STREET
I 4~ ~~~~r I o,~~
! :; I ~~ 2 Iw I i 2 I L.J ~ .,
~ A J ~ ::> .~ ~
4~1 .~~ I ~ /31 ~~~n~
38 39 I ()O'l(~o~ <( 114~ ~ ~~f(\'
37 .'\. ~ ~.~:r bP\
36 ,,0. 5 I- "l('i1.~~ C/)
W I-
~. 6 I ~ Ict'~; ~
34 0 . .L\J~ W
I !; 7 I ct.}d" 7 I I
5
I
-/
;;;
d> EXISTING SURROUNDING USES
<;>
0
"
'"
'"
"0
c OWNER: Greenmack Clearwater, LLC CASE: 01- 09- 31
(\l FL
~
~
"0 I PROPERTY
Qi SITE: 501 Mandalay Avenue SIZE (ACRES): 6.16
'"
'"
"0
C
(\l
ii) PIN: OS/29/15/99216/000/0010
'"
13
Ql
0 ATLAS
a: 267A
"0 PAGE:
c
(\l
:=!
Iii
....
..
..
Catalina Beach Resort ~esidences
Site Design Narrative
Flori<1a Dcslgn consultants
October 5,2001
The Catalina Beach Resort Residences site design shall comply with all the requirements of the City of Clearwater's
Community Development Code, a well as, those of the Southwest Florida Water Management District and various
other agencies having jurisdiction over the project. The salient features of the site design are as follows:
AccessIParking
Access to the proja:t shall be through the entrance off Mandalay Avenue. The same location where the entrance to
the existing apartments is found. For the secwity of our residents, only one access is being proposed through the
Guard House. The entrance and exit drives are each 16 feet wide to allow for byPaSS traffic in the event of a
disabled vehicle. Parking is being provided on the first two level!! of the structure. The proposed parking is well in
eXCeSS of the City's minimum requirement, to accommodate the lifestyles of our residents.
The turning radius at the end of the: entrance drive is 45 ft., while the proposed portccochere shall have a 19 ft.
overhead clearance. Both of these features will fucilitate fire protectionlhealth emergency vehicle accesS.
GradjnWDrainage/Flood Protection
The tltst parking level (ground level) will have an elevation of around 8.0 M.S.L. (mean sea level datum), slightly
higher than the elevation of the surrounding streets (elevation 5-6 M.S.L.).
All stormwater runoff generated by the project shall be collected by a system of yard/floor drains and
intefConnecting pipes. The flows will be routed to one of the underground vaults for treatment prior to discharge
into the Bay. As requested by the City Engineer, new outflow pipes shalt be constructed to the project boundaries.
In conformance with SWFWMD criteria the underground vaults shall provide treatment, via filtration, fOf 150% of
the required volume. The 100 year flood elevation at this site: ill elevation 11.0 M.S-L Consequently, the lowest ..
residential floor shall be at, or above, FEMA's 100 year flood level. .
Utilities
Sanitary sewer service will utilize the existing 8" line located off Mandalay Avenue, near the entrance drive. This
line provides adequate capacity for the anticipated flows.
Water for domestic use shall be provided by the City of Clearwater. Two separate water meters are proposed for
each of the North Villa and the Midrise Villa. Line/meter size will depend on the fixture count for each of the
arorementioned villas. Adequate service: capacity is available to the project.
Fire protection rot" the structure & grounds shall be provided through con.nection to the City's water system.
Additional tire hydrants, if required, shall be shown on the final construction plans. Final design shall also address
the design of pump room( s) to assure adequate water pressure for all residential units.
Refuse collection has been coordinated with the City's Solid Waste Department. All trash receptacles shall be
inside the building and will be rolled out for pick up. The residence staff shall coordinate with tl,e City's Solid
Waste Superintendent a mutually agreeable location and tiJne for pick-up.
Q:\Catalilla Beach Resort Residences.doc
i'lo.
(/~...>,
C '..
,/
. --,.~
..,.,,+
i'h.
.~//
OIZ-j SO/YO d 060-1
1l98lvvUl+
^13~V18'NOSNHor-WOJj wdll:vO 10-80-01
..
..
..
Catalina Beach Resort Residences
Landscape Design Narrative
Phil Graham and Company
October 5, 2001
The Catalina Beach Resort Residences laudscapc design integrates the City of Clearwater's Beach By D~igrr
planning document with the elegance of waterside resort living. The two housing types, high rise towers and lower
level town homes on the perimeter are surrounded by a lush, n-opj(:a1landscape of palms and flowering trees, shrnbs
and ground covers . A promenade walk encompasses the entire perimoter of the community "With large Medjool Date
Palms spaced fifty feet on center. The tropical plant palette has been selected to enhance the tropical arobiance of the
site. The majority of plant materials are cold and salt tolerant to prcrvide lasting beauty.
The view down Mandala.y Avenue is one of tropical elegance, with a double row of specimen Medjool Date Palms
spaced thirty feet on center which buffer the buildings from the roadway. This character adheres to the
recommended street tree theme of the Beach By Design document A generous sidewalk transitions into the Retail
and Restaurant District to the south while providing the pedestrian user ample room for a wide vatiety of activities.
The main entry provides a grand entrance with an obelisk 5ClJlpture and water features on the ground level. A
''village green" boulevard is created down the center median with shade trees while the edges are flanked with an
assortment of specimen palms. All landscaping at the entry/exit points to Ca.talina will adhere to all clear sight
visibility requirements. The site amemty areas support numerous swimming pools, spas, and sundecks. Lawn games
will be carefully enhanced or buffered from primary vistas. Above grade plantings between the buildings will be
accomplished through a use of several plauters_ The..;e planters -will help to cany the tropical theme through the
entire property while accentuating the buildings on the site.
The irrigation water source will be the City of Clearwater's reclaimed water system. Irrigation spray heads will be
carefully designed to provide 100% head to head coverage while minimizing over-spray to all public areas and
buildings. Low volume irrigation including bubbleno, low ate nozzles and emitters will utilized. where appropriate,
to maximize water conservation.
The Clearwater Beach community will benefit greatly from the new Catalina Beach Resort Residences. The
character and quality of the on-street amenities will enhance the roadway experience of area visitors and residents.
The consistency of planting and paving materials will further unify this site with the many e)tciting projects
occurring in Clearwater Beach and strengthen the Beach Py Design concept.
a
('},
...r-'"
/;:';:J1
,r:~
':(~;"
OlZ-~ 90/90 d 060-1
ll98lvv1Z1+
A13~V18'NOSNHor-WOJj Wdll:vO lO-80-0l
.
.
~
CATALINA BEACH RESORT RESIDENCES
BEACH BY DESIGN
VlI. DESIGN GUIDELINES
BULK
1. To promote development and redevelopment which is in scale with tJ1e character
<l11d function of Clearwater Beach.
The Catalina Beach Resort Residences (CBRR) will be a catalyst for the
redevelopment of the entire Marina District and will enhance new and
existing projects within its immediate context. Catalina is designed to have
n beach resort character through shapes~ materials and landscaping. The
smaH and articulated design elements issue a pedestrian friendly sca'e and a
memorable "place" by virtue of the small, almost hidden courtyards that
reveal themselves from the street. The CBRR wiJJ truly be a "village" of
residences.
2. To ensure that the gross density and intensity of development on Clearwater
Beach does not exceed the capacity of public infrastructure.
The CBRR will reduce the total number of units that currently exist on the
Yacht Basin site and therefore wi)) reduce the density and impact on the
public infrastructure.
3. To ensure new development is compatible with existing buildings.
The CBRR wiH elevate the quality of arcMtectu.-e of the surrounding
context and set new standards for the future developments in the Marina
distJ'ict.
4. To maintain a distinct chatacter on Cleanvater Beach
The CBRR will add to the variety of architecture and enh3Jtce the resort
character of the lVlarina district and Clearwater Beach, while maintaining ..
village atmosphere in character with Clearwater Beach.
5 . To avoid further "wal ling off" of the Gulf 1)[ Mexico and the Intercoastal
Waterway with preserve view corridors and prevent the "walling off' of the
Intercoastal Waterway.
The orientation of the buildings in tIle CBRR, perpendicular to North
Malldalay, wjlJ preserve view corridors and prevent the "walling off' of the
Intercoastal 'Waterway.
9ZZ-j 80/Z0 d 001-1
L 1981vvLZH
^1~~V18'NOSNHor-lliOJ3 wdZE: 10 10-60-01
.
.
6. To promote diversity in scale, mass and height of buildings
The CBRR has severa! different building masses with varying heigbts
ranging from 27'to 130' thus creating a diversity of scale, mass and height of
the different buildings.
7. To ensure that sidewalks are sufficiently widc to alJow groups of pedestrians to
pass without having to walk in the street. .
In the CBRR, the proposed sidewalks on North MandaJay are 18~ wide and
on Baymont Street are J2' wide.
8. To ensure that the height ofbLlildings is relative to and in scale with the width
of public spaces.
The overall design of the different buildings in the CBRR step back from the
street and the Intercoastal Waterway focusing the projects mass away from
the pubUc spaces and allowing for the lower portions ofthe buildings to
create back drops to the open spnce that are constant with the surrounding
context and are human in scale.
DESIGN
1. To ensure aesthetica.lly pleasing architecture in a tropical vernacular
The design emphasizes a stepped fa~ade a.cceoted with balconies and
terraces, small in scale with coquina and limestone textures and colors.
Windows are individual and proportioned to human scale. The bases of the
buildings have wide arches and recesses, remembering courtyards and
passages in tropical vernacular.
2. To create inviting, human scale "places" at the street level of all buildings
Human scale "places" is the essence of the design. The t...ee lined village
green, tbe promenade, the square in front., and the cOUl'tyards OJ) the sides
are all very strong "places" in scale and detnil of texture and color.
3. To promote an integration of form and functJOD
Function relates here to private living with an excellent view, connected to
available resort amenities of the project and Clearwater Beach. The form
accents individual residences in a wen-defined~ identifiable village with
intriguing connections to the dty. .
9ZZ-j 80/80.d 001-1
Ll981\1VLZlt
A13~V18'NOSNHor-WOJj wdZE: 10 10-60-0!
)
.
.
4. To create a sense of a "heach community neighborhood" throughout Cle::trw::J.fer
Beach
Memorable cities are made of memorable neighborhoods. This "hcl:l.ch
community neighborhood" is enhanced by our Mandalay tree lined
recreational frontage and by the jntimate character of the courtyards along
Baymont.
5 . To use landscape material to differentiate Clearwater Beach from other beach
areas and intensely developed places in Pinel1as County
The landscape palette is specifically tropkal, majestic and pedestrian scaled.
Stately lVledjool Date Palms and dark green heavy textured specie~ from tIle
Beach By Design list are used.
6. To landscape all surface parking areas so th€J the view of such parking faciJities
from public roads, sidewalks and other places is determined by landscape materiaf
instead of asphalt.
AU parking and services are concealed behind landscaped, fulJy detailed
architectural walls and courtyards.
7. To ensure that the street level of all buildings is pedestrian friendly
Every design effort has been made in form, use, texture, material, light and
shade to make the immediate pedestrian environment not only friendly hut
unmatched in its appeal and identifiable enough to be known across the state.
A. Density:
Current existing # units on site = 202 units
Proposed # Units = 200 uuits
Site Area = 6.165 acres
B. Height:
The heights of the buildings vnry, creating an aesthetically pleasing vet'tical
diversity. The Town homes and Marina Homes ran~e from 25' to 35'; the
South building reaches 99' in height with two intermediate tiers to reduce
mllss and add character. Similarly, the North building reache~ 130' in
height, but also tiers in at 100'.
c. . Desigo, Scale and Mass of Building:
9ZZ-~ 80/vO.d 001-1
1.198lvvLZH
^13~Y18'NOSNHor-WOJj llidZE: 10 10-60-01
t
.
.
~.. v -. J
A ~1~nific~nt fe~tore for C!lt!llin!t i!: th~ "Rl!!;:ort VilI5lg<>" design ("on~(!pt,
with its stepped fa<;.ade, aud detailed small roof masses. The huildings are
tiered so that the street-front elements are human scale, and blend with
adjacent shops and restaurants, continuing and enhancing the village
character of Clearwater Beach. The mass is reduced by a series of tiers,
resulting in a buiJdiug envelope above 45', which is well under the 60%
theoretical maximum.
TIle mass is also reduced by a major setback on Mandalay Avenue with a
wide tree lined walk and park space and the offset notch for the tennis, Jawn
.and pool feature; then further by stepbaeks in the buildings and by the
separatiou of the buildings with the on-grade village green.
D. Setbacks:
Fl"Ont (West): Multiple front setbacks ranging from 45' to 160' along
Mandalay Avenue with arches, arcades, and tree-lined
walkways.
Side (South)~ 20' setback along Baymoot with garden courtyards, and a
tree-lined walkway
Side (North): 20' setback from seawall with garden courtyards, along a
tree-lined Marina Promenade.
Rear (East): 20' to 3W setback along the marina frontage with g~rden
cou rtyaxds, and a tree-lined Marina Promenade
E. Street Level Facades: The street level f~lcades are pedestrian io scaJe, and
are accented with smaJl courtyards. rh~ maiu entry is designed to create a
front-to-back vista on grade, with clubhouse and bay in public vie1-". The
corners and edges are well defined to give identity. The textures and
widths of the sidewalks BY" inviting for the pedestrian and for the drivers
passing by.
F. Parking Areas~ All parking is secure, enclosed, and concealed from street
view. There are approximatelv 400 parking spaces provided, well io excess
of tbe required 300.
G. Signage: Sign age is discreet and integrated with the building design)
appropriate for a resort village. The logo, typeface, Ul':l,terials and general
image is elegant io appearance.
H. Sidewalks: Sidewalks l1re traditional and genel"OUS iu width: 18' along
Mandalay Avenue 8nd 12' along Baymont Street.
9ZZ-~ aO/SO"d 001-1
1199IvvL2l+
A13~V18'NOSNHor-WOJj wd2E: 10 10-60-01
.
.
.
~
J.
Street Furniture and Bike Racks: Street fUt'l1iture nud bike r(lcks are
proposed along Mandalay at the Marin;} "view" area and then "Park
Square"
J. Street Lighting: Street lighting is includ1cd featuring European Village type
lamps, five (5) along Mandalay A1'enue and four (4) along Baymont. The
basic lighting scheme however is the landscape lighting; indirect and
conce,lled thM emphasizes the tropical courtv:lrds, arches and arcades.
K. Fountains: A Fountain is located as a focal point into the arcade facing the
park at Mandalay and Baymont.
9ZZ-j aO/90 d 001-1
ll9alHLZL+
A13~V18'NOSNHor-WOJj WdSS: 10 10-60-0!
y- -.-.--
.-
From: Planning Department -
fJ;1rArlr R,.~v
Planner Requesting Maps
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT MAP REQUEST
Please prepare the following maps:
1. Color Aerial Photograph with the property outlined and streets marked.
2. Location Map
3. Flexible Development Request Map
4. Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Requested on:
For Completion by:
Survey Attached: D
Legal Description Attached:Y
Comments:
OWNER: /
or.tZ.e/1
SITE: ~O
lu. it L
CASE:
Fl (9/- f/r,,1
PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES:) 0./ l/
PIN'
. 05 -Zq.../S-WZlb-a;v-
ATLAS Of) ((J
PAGE: ZG7A
,..... . ~. .... ....
~
. .. .. .---.. . . ...... '-'I..., II\L'" tJLLI\J\ ur LAJUII: I
PHULAS COUNTV, FLffilDA
~",. c-~,
I ' :' ; 'J ' ;;> t.
< ,.,1 ",' "I
01-051685 FE8-20-2001 4eM
PINELLAS CO 8K 11231 PG 5
. ':. . .11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
. . .
PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
Joseph J. Sorota, Jr.
JOSEPH J. SOROTA, JR., P.A.
28100 U.S. Highway 19 North, Suite 504
Clearwater, Florida 33761-2686
Tel: (727)796-1~~7..
.
------------------------------------.
8C142629 02-20-2001 16:20:57
51 DED-LIMA LAKE He
OOX)()ooooo
In: BK:
REDORDING 002 PAGES
DOC STAMP - DR219
VI
SPG:
1
3
EPG:
$10.
$71 875.
. ' ~. ".' '" I ;
TOTAl:
P CHECK AMT. TENDERED:
CHANGE:
B~__ DEPUTV CLERK
$71,585.
$71,585.
$,1
::,(:'
,.
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS INDENTURE made this 20th day of February, 2001, between the following named
parties:
GRANTOR: LIMA LAKE, INC., a Florida corporation
GRANTOR'S ADDRESS: Post Office Box 3488, Clearwater, Florida 33767
GRANTEE: GREENMACK CLEARWATER, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company
GRANTEE'S ADDRESS: 30 Jelliff Lane, South port, Connecticut 06490
(Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to
this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and
the successors and assigns of corpbrations)
)
'-.,
r
'.
WIT N E SSE T H:
That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/IOO ($10.00)
DOLLARS and other valuable consideration, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, by these
presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the Grantee,
all that certain land situate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz:
Lots 1 through 9, YACHT BASIN SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof,
recorded in Plat Book 25, Page 35, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Property address: 501 Mandalay Avenue. Clearwater, Florida 33767-1702
Tax ParceII.D.# 05-29-15-99216-000-0010
TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging
or in anywise appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever.
AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that it is lawfully seized of said land
in fee simple; that it has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that it hereby
specially warrants the title to said land for any acts of the Grantor and will defend the same
against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under Grantor but not otherwise;
and that said land is free of all encumbrances except the following:
. "
,.',,-,' l 1
,:,;;:,:U':'~ .
RE,,(Q
'.')n') \ . "..n I' ,lA
t f",\t... I~ - {"t. .
. c~__2.
il'JT__
Subject to taxes and assessments for the year of conveyance and subsequent
years.
:~....--
Subject to Distribution Easement granted to Florida Power Corporation by
instrument recorded in O.R. Book 5026, Page 1740, Public Records of Pinel/as
County, Florida.
';"7":
.: - n' ____
. i,~ ___
J~\I --3,
. ......-1J52f. cD
.:.","' \ i . ~
\'..1 t\.. -
.... ""IL )..c
,'.','. ---
Subject to any and all rights of the United States of America over any lands now or
. formerly lying under navigable waters, arising by reason of the authority of the
.T
--
Special Warranty Deed
Page 1 of 2
.~
PINELLRS COUNTY FLR
OFF,REC,8K 11231 PG 2656
United States of America to control navigable waters iri the interest of navigation
and commerce, and any conditions contained in any permit authorizing the filing of
such areas.
.-
4. Subject to the rights of parties now in possession under any unrecorded leases.
5. Subject to the terms and provisions of all agreements and franchises pertaining to
the cost, installation, operation, and maintenance of gas, water and/or sewer
facilities.
6. Subject to zoning and other governmental regulations affecting the use of the
property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day
and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and witnessed
in our presence:
"GRANTOR"
LIMA LAKE, INC., a Flori
~~
By: Michael C. Rausch, President
(Corporate Seal)
o
NAME LEG BL Y PRINTED, TYPEWRITTEN
OR 5T AMPED
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,;1.0'/'1<..-- day of February,
2001, by Michael C. Rauscty President of LIMA LAKE, INC., a Florida corporation, who 0 is
personally known to me or [!Jhas produced ::I/Iino/s dnvU'~ II~eI1St..- as identification.
~t,~
ig ture of Notary Public
Printed name:
Commission Expires:
"",:~'~~A~:~;:;;;...,.. Jayne E. Sears
{*r~"'f;~ MY COMMISSION H CC646775 EXPIRES
;'~'~'~"l September 2, 2001
-",r..9f..i~~;'" BONDED THAll TROY FAIN IfISlJRANCE, INC.
A:\NIC0710 Yacht Basin sale to Mack docs\5pecial Warranty Deed.wpd
Special Warranty Deed
Page 2 of 2
.
. <." ~ +-tJ C'_~
CASE #: _FL
;....'."'I/;i:I:::\'a". rwater
.. ..... . -.
p ..... ..
... ..... .
.." ..... ...
.. ..... .....
>-::::;. ";;:;::": :;;:::;'".
. . . . . . .
~- ........:- -. -.. .'... .".
-~~
I)~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans
.)i:t SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ /2L>S.oo
""
1.
it"
FLEXffiLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
(Revised 03/29/01)
t" :;'\
!;., II
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Secti
Greenmack Cleaxwater, LLC, a Florida limited liab' ~
APPLICANT NAME:
30 Jelliff Lane, Southport, cr 06490
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
(203) 256-7788
FAX NUMBER:
(203) 256-7787
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
(Sane as above)
(Must include ALL owners)
CK. NQ (OSL/
DATE <Y1 'J..f) ::)fr>I. :S. W.
AGENT NAME:
E. D. Armstronq III, Esquire
Jolmson, Blakely, pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A.
MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box 1368. CleaYWr'ltFr, 'PT, 117Sfl 1 iflR
PHONE NUMBER:
(727) 461-1R1R
FAX NUMBER:
(727) 441-8617
8.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
501 Mandalay Avenue
STREET ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein.
PARCEL NUMBER:
05-29-15-99216-000-0010
PARCEL SIZE:
6.164 acres m.o.l.
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): 200 multi -farnil y units
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): The applicant has simultaneously submitted an application for
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
rezoning to HDR. This is a request for Flexible IBveloprrent Approval as described in
~eE\a-kks ~~p~T~~rN~Jr.~E'tt~'\9tl~F2~H~~~~8r~~~)~~USL Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO -1L (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents
Page 1 of 5 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
a SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
a Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1 . The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is
located.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
See Exhibit "Bu attached.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
See Exhibit "B" attached.
a Address the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets
as necessary):
See Exhibit "B" attached.
Page 2 of 5 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required;
o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines.)
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 1 0'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborisf', of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 3 of 5 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
G.
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
, 0
0
~.
.
LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 11, X 11) (color rendering if possible);
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (811, X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
I. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 11, X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip
generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the
Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
K. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Swom to and subscribed before me this ,;JJ)'I1o- day of
.0 ~f"1l,yn b.z.r-, A. D. 20 0 I to me and/or by
E: . . A NhS tnm~ 1JI, who is personally known ~ed
as~
/~:;~// //~;(/;:/:<;/- /' /'
':/" / /' / <; / (<' / /.' / ,,"
l 6 ,/ (// C// ~ (-,,' / //'./-"
Signature of property owner or representative
t.~
~
~r:~~~,~xPires
,.:f;.......~~.< . Jayne E. Sears
f*(~'\*~ MY COMMISSION # 00041066 EXPIRES
~'~'~"l September 2, 2005
"'~,9f.,i~:t-.. BONDED THRU TROY fAIN INSURANCE. INC
Page 4 of 5 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
0.9-18-01. 02:37pm
From-JOHNSON,r' '~LY
.
+7274418617
T-752 P.02/03 F-770
.
L. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
GREa:NM1\CK ~, LLC, a FloriCla limited liability conpany
(Names of au property owner-o) .
1- That (I anvwe are) the owner(s) and record title nolder(s) of the fOllowing described property (address or generqlloeation):
501 Mandalay Avenue, Clea%water Beach -
Parcel #05-29-15-99216-000-0010 -
Z. That tI'IlS property constitutes the property for wnich a request for a: (deSCr1be request)
Flexible develo~nt approval ~
~. That ttle undaf'Slgnea (has/have) appoinrea and (dol!S/dO) appoint:
E. D. .AJ::mstrong III, Esquire of Johnson, Blakely, Pope I Bokor, Ruppel & Bw:ns,P.A.
as (hl:oltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary TO affect suen petition;
4. That tI'Iis affidaVIt has been ell8Cuted to Inauce tne City of Clearwater. Florida to conlOiaer ;sna ;set on the above described property:
5. Thm site visits t~ the propertY are'necessary by City representatives in order to process thIS application and the owner authorIZes City representatives to
IIISll and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (I/we). the undersigned autnonty. hereby certify that the foregOing is rrue and correct.
~-~, me T.Tr.
prope~ ~wner I k fJ fvLA,--
Propeny Owner _.. P. MarCUS, Sr. Vice President
STATE OF ~ICUT )
COUNTY OF . )
Before me the LJnClers210e\ an officer dUlY comrnis510necl by the laws of tlie Slate of AonCla. on this / t:J*^-' day of
Sept. . 00 per&Onallyappeared Barry P. MarCUS* wno having been first aUly sworn
Oapos6S ana says that ne/she fullY unclerslancs the contents of the affidavit that ne/$l1e signed. ;~xI~
was Sr. Vice President of G:r:eenfield CleaJ:Water,
LLC, Managing Merrber of Gree:nmack Clearwater, LLC Notary PUbhc
My Commission Expires: '/ /3) J~
S!\Plannin9 DtJpanmt!JnrlAf)plit;~tio" FarmsldoVl:/opmenr f8viewlflcxiblo !3oVtllIQP1nt:nt lJppllcarltJfI.dtJc
4'~aeO"l-7 ", - Olggr'W'l"tg( f"loXI~ll" Clov..h..,..,,,,..n< Appl;....~i..n
Page 5 of 5 - Flexible Development Application - Ci'tY ot Clearwate,
~
.
Text for surrounding land use maps
for CDB cases
Revised 1/12/01
Use correct spelling
Do not abbreviate
Choose from the following land use
terms:
o Community residential home
o Adult use
o Airport
o Assisted living facility
o Auto service station
o Cemeteries
o Congregate care
o Convention center
o Educational facility (e.g. junior
...... /college, technical school)
it) Governmental use
o Halfway house
o Hospital
o Indoor recreation/entertainment
o Light assembly
o Manufacturing
o ftanna
<' Medical clinic
o Mobile home park
o Multi-family residential
o Nightclub
o Nursing home
o Office
o Open space
o Outdoor recreation/entertainment
~ Overnight accommodation
~ Park
o Parking garage
rJC Parking lot
o Place of worship
o Problematic use
\\MS2\PDS\Planning Department\C D Blmaps\Textfor
surrounding land use maps for CDS cases. doc
.
o Public transportation facility
o Research/technology use
o Residential shelter
~ Restaurant
~ Retail
o RV park
o Salvage yard
o School
o Self storage
o Single-family residential
o Social/community center
o Social/public service agency
o Telecommunications tower
o TV/radio studio
o Utilitylinfrastructure facility
o Vehicle sale/display
o Vehicle service
o Veterinary office
o Wholesale/warehouse
U 1 U::J !btl:! fE8-20 2001 4: 19PM
/~:.,l~'-" PINELLAS CO 8K 11231 PG 2655
'. . " . .11111111111111111 111111111111111 11111111111111111'
PREPARED BY AND RETURN
Joseph J. Sorota, Jr.
JOSEPH J. SOROTA, JR., P.A.
28100 U.S. Highway 19 North, Suite 504
Clearwater, Florida 33761-2686
Tel: (727).796-1557__
"-"- -..,...."." I LI.Jt\.I.Un
BC142629 02-20-2001 16:20:57 VI
51 DED-L.E He
0000000000
In: BK: SPG: EPG:
RECORDING 002 PA!iES 1 $10.
ooe STAMP - DR219 3 $71.5'15.
. ,;:,. .,;',
TOTAL:
P CHECK AMI. TENDERED:
CHANGE:
B~_ DEPUTY CLERK
:,'t
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS INDENTURE made this 20'h day of February, 2001, between the following named
parties:
GRANTOR: LIMA LAKE, INC., a Florida corporation
GRANTOR'S ADDRESS: Post Office Box 3488, Clearwater, Florida 33767
GRANTEE: GREENMACK CLEARWATER, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company
GRANTEE'S ADDRESS: 30 Jelliff Lane, Southport, Connecticut 06490
(Wherever used hereinthe terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to
this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and
the successors and assigns of corporations)
c
WIT N E SSE T H:
That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/IOO ($10.00)
DOLLARS and other valuable consideration, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, by these
presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the Grantee,
all that certain land situate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz:
Lots 1 through 9, YACHT BASIN SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof,
recorded in Plat Book 25, Page 35, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Property address: 501 Mandalay Avenue. Clearwater, Florida 33767-1702
Tax Parcel 1.0.# 05-29-15-99216-000-0010
: ..'
TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging
or in anywise appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever.
AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that it is lawfully seized of said land
in fee simple; that it has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that it hereby
specially warrants the title to said land for any acts of the Grantor and will defend the same
against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under Grantor but not otherwise;
and that said land is free of all ~ncumbrances except the following:
"--,,-,- 1 1
1:.,~~:,~'cT:m- - .
RE.:(D
'n?\~7-I .~
! I 'r:~ _ 2.
.t'IT__
Subject to taxes and assessments for the year of conveyance and subsequent
years.
r;--~ _
Subject to Distribution Easement granted to Florida Power Corporation by
instrument recorded in O.R. Book 5026, Page 1740, Public Records of Pine lias
County, Florida.
'i-._
.\.~--
-:;:'1 --3,
.....1J52f \D
......-. Ii .
1::.1 f.\.... -
-:'-'_}l_L_~
Subject to any and all rights of the United States of America over any lands now or
formerly lying under navigable waters, arising by reason of the authority of the
T
Special Warranty Deed
Page 1 of 2
$?1, 585.
$?1,585.
$.1
)
'-.
~
~
. PINELLAS COUNWLA
OFF.REC.8K 1123 2656
United States of America to control navigable waters iri the interest of navigation
and commerce, and any conditions contained in any permit authorizing the filing of
such areas.
4.
Subject to the rights of parties now in possession under any unrecorded leases.
5.
Subject to the terms and provisions of all agreements and franchises pertaining to
the cost, installation, operation, and maintenance of gas, water and/or sewer
facilities.
6.
Subject to zoning and other governmental regulations affecting the use of the
property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day
and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and witnessed
in our presence:
"GRANTOR"
LIMA LAKE, INC., a Flori
~~
By: Michael C. Rausch, President
(Corporate Seal)
o
NAME LEG SLY PRINTED. TYPEWRITTEN
OR STAMPED
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .;1.0 rk-- day of February,
2001, by Michael C. Rauscty President of LIMA LAKE, INC., a Florida corporation, who 0 is
personally known to me or IiJhas produced :::Illinois dnvU"~ IIChlSe- as identification.
~uY C, ~
ig ture of Notary Public
Printed name:
Commission Expires:
Jayne E. Sears
MY COMMISSION N CC646775 EXPIRES
September 2. 2001
BONOED THRU TROY fAIN ItlStJRANCE. me
A:\NIC0710 Yacht Basin sale to Mack docs\Special Warranty Oeed.wpd
Special Warranty Deed
Page 2 of 2
"
.
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: October 16, 2001
Case Number: FL 01-09-31
Agenda Item: .
DRAFT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ST AFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
REPRESENT A TIVE:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
PLANS REVIEWED:
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC
E.D. Armstrong, III, Esquire (Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Ruppel &
Bums, P.A.)
501 Mandalay Avenue
Flexible Development approval to permit an Increase In the
number of dwelling units from 184 to 200 units under the
provisions of Section 6-109 B, as a Termination of Status as a
Nonconformity, increase the permitted height of the North Villa
(north portion of the site) from 30 feet to 130 feet, increase the
height of the Midrise Villa (south portion of the site) from 30 feet
to 99 feet, reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to
pavement, reduce the side (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet
to paveme~duce the front (west) setback along Mandalay
A venue fro~5 feet to zero feet to pavement, reduce the front
(south) setback along Baymont Street fro~5 feet to 18 feet for
building and to reduce the front (south) setback along Baymont
Street from 25 feet to zero feet for pavement within the HDR, High
Density Residential District (proposed - see companion case Z 01-
09-03), as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions
of Section 2-504 at 501 Mandalay Avenue.
Site plans and architectural elevations submitted by Gillett
Associates ARDT Group, Incorporated
Landscape plans submitted by Phil Graham & Company, P.A
Page 1
.
.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
6.164 acres; 268,504 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
547 feet of width by 572 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Attached dwellings
Attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
RH, Residential High Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District (HDR, High
Density Residential District proposed - see companion case Z 01-
09-03)
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
West: Attached dwellings
East: Attached dwellings
South: Clearwater Bay
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIA TE VICINITY: High-density residential, overnight accommodation and assorted
marina and other non-residential uses dominate the immediate
vicinity.
BACKGROUND:
I imagine that we're going to have to speak to the Beach By Design that was just adopted that we
need to revamp just for these folks. I don't have much to say on that, really.
Page 2
'.
.
.
ANALYSIS:
The rectangular site is 6.16 acres located on the northeast comer of Mandalay A venue and
Baymont Street. The site contains 202 units located within eight buildings ranging in height
between feet and feet. The site is located within a redeveloping portion of Clearwater
Beach located directly along Clearwater Bay. Overnight accommodation establishments,
restaurants, public parks and other assorted, non-residential uses define the area.
The proposal includes the demolition of 202 units located within eight buildings ranging in
height between feet and feet and two, one-story accessory buildings (office and laundry
facility). These buildings and units will be replaced with a 200-unit, condominium located
within two buildings connected by a one-story clubhouse. units will be located with the
North Villa a square foot building 130 foot in height. units will be located with the
Midrise Villa a square foot building one hundred foot in height, located on the south portion
of the site. II units will be located within a II square foot building II feet in height located
along the south property line along Baymont Street. All parking will be located under the
proposed buildings. Access to the site is proposed via a single ingress/egress point along
Mandalay A venue. The applicant is proposing to locate a multi-use dock along the east and
north property lines at some point in the future. The multi-use docks are not a part of this
application and will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development
Board prior to the issuance of any permits.
The contemporary, Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco,
terracotta, barrel, tile roofs, and a significant number of windows and balconies on all elevations.
The proposed landscaping will exceed the intent of Code and will include palms, flowering trees
and shrubs providing interest throughout the year. All sight triangles will be honored providing
unblocked views to the water from adjacent sites as required by Code. All proposed signage will
need to meet current Code requirements. Amenities will be located throughout the site and
include swimming pools, hot tubs and a tennis court. Any structures located within 18 feet of the
seawall will require a variance through the City's Board of Adjustment and Appeal for Building
and Flood, prior to the issuance of any building permits.
The site plan is accompanied by a companion zoning change request, Z 01-09-03, from MHDR,
Medium High Density Residential District to HDR, High Density Residential District.
The plan includes a vaulted retention area located at the northwest and southeast comers of the
site under or partially under the North and Midrise Villas.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding code violations associated with this site.
Page 3
'.
.
.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD
IN THE HDR, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (proposed see
companion case Z 01-09-03) (Section 2-501. 1.):
STANDARD
PERMITTEDI
REQUIRED
30 dwelling units
per acres (184
uni ts )
0.85
EXISTING
PROPOSED
DENSITY
202 units
200 units
IN
COMPLIANCE?
No*
IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE
RA TIO
* The application includes a termination of Status as a Nonconformity under the provisions
of Section 6-109 B.
0.83
Yes
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT ST ANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL
PROJECTS IN THE HDR, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (proposed
see companion case Z 01-09-03) (Section 2-504):
STANDARD PERMITTEDI EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 6.164 acres; 6.164 acres; Yes
268,504 square 268,504 square
feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 547 feet 547 feet Yes
HEIGHT 30 - 130 feet 130 feet Yes
FRONT YARD 10 - 25 feet South (Baymont South (Baymont Yes*
SETBACK Street): 9.8 feet Street): zero feet
- to building - to pavement;
West (Mandalay 18 feet to
A venue) 25 feet building
- to building West (Mandalay
A venue) 0 feet -
to avement
SIDE YARD o - 10 feet East: zero feet to East: zero feet to Yes
SETBACK pavement pavement
North: zero feet North: zero feet
to pavement to pavement
Page 4
.
.
STANDARD PERMITTED! EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
REAR YARD 0-15 feet N/A** N/A** N/A**
SETBACK
PARKING 1 space per 405 spaces Yes
SPACES dwelling unit
(200 s aces)
*
The development standards for Residential Infill Projects are guidelines and may be
varied based on the criteria specified in Section 2-504(F).
Comer lots have only front and side setbacks under the provisions of Section 3-903.
**
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR ATTACHED DWELLINGS IN THE HDR, HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (proposed) (Section 2-504):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and other development
standards;
Why is it not possible to building something that actually meets Code -
I need some reasons.
Page 5
.
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill
project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposed variations from Code are consistent with the character of the neighborhood
and the Mandalay A venue street improvements. The proposed complex will likely
enhance property values in the area. The current assessed valuation of the site is
$_. With the redevelopment proposal, the assessed valuation is projected at
$85,000,000. This increase in property value is expected to have a beneficial effect on
surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district;
The proposal includes 200 dwelling units within two buildings. The City of Clearwater
permits attached dwelling use. The site is currently zoned MHDR District, and the use is
permitted within that classification. Companion application Z 01-09-03 proposes
changing the zoning of the site to HDR, High Density Residential District. The land use
is currently Residential High Classification and will not change. The proposed use is also
compatible with the proposed zoning of HDR District.
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly high-density residential, overnight accommodation
and assorted marina and other non-residential uses. Many of the structures in the area are
low- to mid-rise. The Clearwater Hotel across Mandalay A venue to the west is
approximately II feet in height. The proposed condominium complex is specifically
geared to take advantage of the views of the waterfront along Clearwater Bay. This
location provides a unique opportunity to redevelia portion of Clearwater Bay that is
currently underutilized. The proposal maintains. feet between the North Villa (130
feet in height) and Midrise Villa (99 feet in height). There will be a minimum of II feet
between the buildings on the subject site and any other surrounding buildings. How is
the size and scale of the project compatible with adjacent land uses?
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The architecture and amenities will enhance the area. The existing
structures in the area are similar in terms of size and scale to the proposal. The proposed
condominium complex is specifically geared to take advantage of the views of the
waterfront and Clearwater Bay. It will aid in the revitalization of Clearwater Beach. This
location provides a unique opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Beach that is
currently underutilized.
Page 6
.
.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of Clearwater
Beach and Downtown Clearwater. The proposed development will play an important role
in the continuing revitalization of both the beach and Downtown Clearwater. The City
will benefit by having an attractive building complex located in a redeveloping area. The
proposed condominium buildings and landscape enhancements, as revised, will
significantly improve the site.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking,
access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community
character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and
the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposal includes height and setbacks that are generally consistent with other
structures in the area. The neighborhood consists of well-maintained, high-density
residential, overnight accommodation and assorted marina and other non-residential uses.
The proposal is consistent with the neighborhood and maintains a streetscape consistent
with the proposed, City-sponsored, Mandalay A venue improvements. While surrounding
buildings have been well maintained, they appear dated. The proposed development
includes an attractive building that will raise the standards in the area and should
encourage like development. The proposed development will aesthetically improve the
immediate area and Clearwater as a whole.
1. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with high-density residential, overnight accommodation and
assorted marina and other non-residential uses. This proposal includes high-end
condominiums with amenities. It will continu.e a positive redev~....IO ment pattern for the
area. There are . buildin s approximately. feet in height, II building. feet in
height and. buildings feet in height along Mandalay A venue. . buildings have
docks or similar structures associated with them.
Page 7
.
.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned Medium High Density Residential District and the proposed
development will be in compliance with that zoning classification. Companion
application Z 01-09-03 proposes changing the site's zoning to HDR, High Density
Residential District. The proposed use is also compatible with the proposed zoning of
HDR District. The design of the site will include an attractive building with preserved
sight views to the water.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed 200-unit, development will have a single ingress/egress point along
Mandalay Avenue. Vehicle trip generation will not have any significant impact on
affected intersections or roadways, with no reduction in level of service (LOS) on any
roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate
vicinity with regard to height and setbacks especially given the FEMA required first floor
elevation. Other surrounding sites have been developed with multi-story structures with
similar setbacks.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of 200 dwelling units within two buildings. The
total number of existing dwelling units will be reduced be two units. No adverse effects
are anticipated with this proposal. All required view triangles will be provided. Parking
in excess of Code requirements will be provided. A landscape plan has been submitted as
part of the proposal which exceeds the intent of Code under the provisions of Section 3-
1202
Page 8
~
.
.
F. Termination of status as a nonconformity (Section 6-109):
1. A structure which is nonconforming with respect to density may be reconstructed
on the same parcel with the same density provided such reconstruction complies
with all other requirements of this Community Development Code.
The proposal includes a Residential Infill Project. All required criteria under the
provisions of Section 2-504 have been addressed. The applicant has also satisfactorily
addressed the General Applicability criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913.
Therefore, this criterion has been met.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on July 12, 2001. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development application to permit an increase in the number of dwelling units from 184 to 200
units under the provisions of Section 6-109 B, as a Termination of Status as a Nonconformity,
increase the permitted height of the North Villa (north portion of the site) from 30 feet to 130
feet, increase the height of the Midrise Villa (south portion of the site) from 30 feet to 99 feet,
reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement, reduce the side (north)
setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement reduce the front (west) setback along Mandalay
A venue from 25 feet to zero feet to pavement, reduce the front (south) setback along Baymont
Street from, 25 feet to 18 feet for building and to reduce the front (south) setback along Baymont
Street from 25 feet to zero feet for pavement within the HDR, High Density Residential District
(proposed - see companion case Z 01-09-03), as part of a Residential Infill Project under the
provisions of Section 2-504 at 501 Mandalay Avenue, for the site at 501 Mandalay Avenue, with
the following bases and conditions:
Basis for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with Flexible Development and Residential Infill Project criteria
under the provisions of Section 2-504;
2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913;
3. The plan complies with the Termination of Status as a Nonconformity under the provisions of
Section 6-109 B; and
4. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Page 9
, (:
.
.
Conditions:
1. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
or as modified by the CDB;
2. That the density be limited to 200 dwellings units and the height of the north building known
as North Villa be limited to 130 feet and the height of the south building known as Midrise
Villa be limited to 99 feet, unless an amended application is reviewed by the CDB;
3. That solid waste and stormwater management requirements to be met, prior to issuance of
building permits;
4. That a setback reduction for all structures including swimming pools, spas and pavement
along the seawall be secured through application to the Board of Adjustment and Appeal for
Building and Flood, as necessary, prior to issuance of building permits; and
5. That all signage comply with Code.
Prepared by: Mark T. Parry, Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D B\Flex\Pending cases\Up for the next DROMandalay 501 Catalina Townhomes\Mandalay 501 STAFF
REPORT.doc
Page 10
It
~
3. Case: Z01-09-03 - 501 Mandalay Avenue - Level Three Application
Owner/Applicant: Greenmack Clearwater, LLC.
Representative: E.D. Armstrong III, Esquire.
Location: 6.164 acres on the northeast corner of Baymont Street and Mandalay
Avenue.
Atlas Page: 267 A and 258A.
Request: Rezoning from MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District to HDR, High
Density Residential District.
Proposed Use: Multi-family Residential.
Presenter: Gina L. Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager.
ACTION:
RECOMMENDED APPROVAL - 6:0. MAZUR AND HOOPER
ABSTAINED.
4. Case: el Two Application
Applicant: earwater, LLC.
Location: 6.164 acres on the northeast corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street.
Atlas Page: 267 A and 258A.
Zoning: HDR, High Density Residential District (Pending approval of a companion
rezoning application Z 01-09-03).
Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the number of dwelling units from
184 to 200 units as part of a Termination of Status on Nonconformity; increase the
permitted height of the northern building (North Villa) from 30 to 130 feet; increase the
permitted height of the southern building (Midrise Villa) from 30 to 99 feet; reduce the
side (east) setback from 15 to zero feet to pavement; reduce the front (west) setback
along Mandalay Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet to pavement; reduce the side (north)
setback from 15 to zero feet to pavement, within the HDR, High Density Residential
District (proposed), as part of a Residentiallnfill Project.
Proposed Use: A 200-unit condominium project including a 130-foot building, 99-
foot building with 25-35 foot townhomes/courtyard homes and amenities.
Presenter: Mary T. Parry, Planner.
Applicable conditions: The companion Beach by Design Special Area Plan and
rezoning amendments be approved by the City Commission; 2) the density be limited to
200 dwellings units; 3) a contribution to a future parking garage in the area be made, as
determined by the City Commission; 4) the streetscape improvements along Baymont
Street and Mandalay Avenue be installed within 2 phases: Phase One includes the area
along Mandalay Avenue north of the entrance of the site, to be completed prior to the
issuance of the last Certificate of Occupancy for the North Villa; Phase Two includes the
Baymont Street frontage and the balance of Mandalay Avenue (south of the entrance),
to be installed prior to the issuance of the last Certificate of Occupancy of the Midrise
Villa; 5) the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the COB; 6) solid waste and stormwater management
requirements to be met, prior to issuance of building permits; 7) a setback reduction for
all structures including swimming pools, spas and pavement along the seawall be
secured through application to the Board of Adjustment and Appeal for Building and
Flood, as necessary, prior to issuance of building permits; 8) all signage comply with
Code; and 9) any future dock request meet Code requirements including review by COB
under a separate application.
ACTION:
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1-9 - 6:0. MAZUR
acd1101
3
11/13/01
.
.
L/~Q
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
Case No. ?-- 0/-09- D 3
Location: ~<i;-O/ M//Jr-J/A/r/j/ 4~
o Current Use: ?;:: r P1- ./ ZC<.-~---<' - /l 4~rt r-/ /nr> J S
o Active Code Enforcement Case. yes:
o Address number" (no) (vacant land)
o Landscaping" (no)
o Overgrown (yes) _
o Debris (yes) .
o Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes).
o Building(s) .. (fair) (poor) (vacant land)
o Fencing _ (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
o Paint _ (fair) (poor) (garish)
o Grass Parking (yes) .
o Residential Parking Violations (yes) ~
o Signage (none) a(not ok) (billboard)
o Parking (n/a) (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving)
o Dumpster tlilillii-<not enclosed)
o Outdoor storage (yes) ..
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
Date of Review; I (] - LL - 0 / Reviewed by; ",-J~!...j ,; r;a. u ~
Revised 03-29-01
e
G. D. Ar--vLlS+vonj ns Gs7Ju/r~
,J2)lul~1 f31~~, p~) ~Okbr-, f2.u.p~
P. (:). ~()-;K \ ~lo~
Cl~~r/P-L 337%-/3bS?
CLEARWATER. CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWF FL
337 _ 4748
SEIFERT. MICHAEL E
SEIFERT. NANCY S
5825 PERSIMMON DR
t'1ADISON WI
53711 5003
D(~NNrl. i"1(-lRK A
255 DOLPHIN PT I 510
CLEARWATEF< FL
33767 2117
SUN HARBOR CONDO ASSN INC
479 E SHORE DR APT 6
CLEARWATER FL
~33767 2039
L.AWSON. PETER S
479 EAST SHORE DR I 2
CLEARWATEF.:( FL
~5376 7 2039
TILLY. CARL It~C
436 COUNTRY CLUB RD
CLEARWATER FL
:33756 1005
GUIRGUIS. SAID N
GUIRGUIS. MINERVA J
202 MONTFORD HALL
~~PEX NC
27502 9412
CHIAVATTI DEVELOPMENT INC
7725 BIRCHMOUNT RD I 37
UNIONVILLE ON L3R 9X3
CAN{1DA
~
.
FL Ol-CA- ~I CDB 11- 13 -6/
8Cf (0) (2) 2 F)
BAY ESPLANADE CONDO ASSN
584 BAY ESPLANADE
CL.EARWATER FL.
~3376 7 1613
<if"
MAG ILL.. ROBERT P
584 BAY ESPL.ANADE I 2
CL.EARWA TEF< FL.
~-)~5767 16.16
L.OLOS. DINOS
l_OLOS. DHl1TRrl
627 f<' HIKA I 0
DES PLAINES Il_
60016 5855
JOHNSON. WILLIAM L.
479 EAST SHORE DR I 1
CLEARWATER FL.
33767 2039
DESAULNIERS. DAVID
905 DELAWARE ST
SAFETY HARBOR FL
~54695 3840
TILLY. M{)RI<.. A
DEL. ROSE. MARYELLEN
479 EAST SHORE DR I 5
CLEi~RWA TER FL
~337 6 7 2039
FULTON HOMES INC
70 GIBSON DR UNIT 4A
MARKHAM ON L3R 4C2
C{)NADA
e
e
CLEARWATER.
PO BOX
CLEA TER
337....8 4748
SOULOUNIAS. KALIOPE
30 f<'ENDALL ST
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1624
XANIA INC
600 MANDALAY AVE STE 4
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1629
PALM PAVILION CLWR INC
10 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEf.)RWATER FL
3376"1 1603
HAMILTON, H G
HAMILTON. JEAN B
10 BAY ESPLANADE
Cl.EARWATER FL
33"16"1 160(,)
PALM PAVILION CLWR INC
18 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARlrJATER I:""L
:3376"1 1603
NOSTH10 INC
C/O MINCIELLI. ATHENA
1036 MCLEAN ST
DUNEDIN FL
34698 Z;533
GERAKIOS. ESTHER TRE
DDJ.AS. Et1EM~P1LD
2800 '.^J I U)I,oIJOOD DR
CLEARWATER FL
33"161 3226
LA SAL MOTEL CONDO ASSN
PO BO>< 1054
DUNEDIN FL
3469"1 1054
FERNANDEZ, ROBERT TRE
FERNANDEZ. MARILYN TRE
1605-B N MACDILL AVE
T A~1P() FL
3360"1 3219
P S B CREDIT SERV INC
PO BOX 38
PRINSBURG MN
56281 0038
P s
PO
PR
t:;. c.....
,.H:>
FERNANDEZ. ROBERT TRE
FER~~' -Z lLYN TRE
1.60 B' DILL AVE
TAt1 .
3360"1 3219
KOENIG. NORBERT
KOENIG. BRUNHILDE
44 EILEEN PNE
PUUNVIElol} NY
11803 5203
222 E 13TH STREET CORP
44 EILEEN AVE
PLAINVIEv.J NY
.L1803 5205
BOBCAT TAMPA BAY INC TRE
FERNANDEZ FAMILY TRUST
1605 N MAC DILL AVE
T~~~1PA FL
52';607 2'.<219
MC LAY. DAVID TRE
PO BOX 7153
CLEARWATER FL
33758 7153
SERV INC
~ 'RV INC
56281
G I f-"lNCOI_f-"l. EDWARD
1567 RIVERDALE DR
OLDSMAR FL
3467"7 4861
OSTROI,IJSK I. JOZEF
OSTROWSKI. RENATA
64 B(..W ESPLPtNADE
CLE~~RWATEI~ FL
53767 1608
CAMPBELL. MERRILL D TRE
CAMPBELL. MARILYN M TRE
TRUST NO 21151
289 W EXCHANGE ST
CF~ETE IL. te04-/7 - 2.3D (p
C~~RAS. FLOR I NE
C/O GEORGE KOLITSAS
PO BOX 1965
CLEAF-<:IIJATER FL
35757 .1965
e
e
!.:.) V (.... ...L. I .t:,...lV"-:~)
RUSULIS, ELAINE TRE
3.1 ISLAND WAY ~ 602
CLEARWATER FL
~2)3767 2206
CHARBONEAU, RENEE A
9342 HIDDEN WATER CIR
RIVERVIEIrJ FL
33569 3031
SCHAPER, CHARLES F
580 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1609
KOZIK, CHRISTIAN A
f<OZIK, ROBERT 0
852 NARCISSUS AVE
CLEAI~(io)ATER FL
?;376 7 11~)1
HESS, PAULINE 0 TRE
HESS, DONALD E TRE
2261 TAMPA RD
PAU1 HARBOR FL
34683 5847
FLORIDA POWER CORP
C/O TAX DEPT CX1G
PO BOX 14042
ST PETERSBURG FL
3~3733 4042
FLO~POWE CORP
C/O 0 - X1G
PO 1
ST PETERSBURG FL
HUBBARD, EUNICE
1736 SAINT PAULS DR
CLEARI,oljATER FL
33764 6462
33733 4042
SHEAR, L DAVID
C/O RUDEN, MC CLOSKY,
401 E JACKSON ST STE
TP,11PA FL
33602 5841
SMITH
2700
SI'lIn-1
2700
BREEZEWAY INC
602 POINSETTIA AVE
CLEARWATER FL
PRESTON, MICHAEL G
4~l9 EAST SHORE DR
CLE::(.~RI,oIjATER FL
TRE
:5376"1 1635
33767 2028
CHAPEL BY SEA CLEARWATER
BEACH COMMUNITY CHURCH INC
54 BAY ESPLANADE
CLE{iRWATER FL
33"/67 1607
CHAPEL BY SEA CLEARWATER
BEA~"\ . 'M ( CHURCH It-.!'C
54 - _ P ~ADE
CLE A. .L
33"/67 160"/
TSAFAROFF, DOROTHY TRE
1508 PLEASANT GROVE DR
DUNEDIN FL
34698 2340
FL CLEARWATER BEACH HOTEL
PO BOX 72::'.50
DES MOINES IA
50:309 72~50
VOYAGER HOLDINGS LTD INC
1151 NE CLEVELAND ST
CLEARI,oljATER FL
33"/55 481.5
INC
ST
BON I, JOM.!' P
1.9 ROCKAWAY ST ~ 4
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1739
KOVI~CS, V I OLET C
23 FWCf<.AWAY ST
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1.739
TEMA INVESTMENTS
31.35 SI,iJ 3RD AVE
MIAMI FL
331.29 2711.
;!3
K
CL
33
GREENMACK CLEARWATER
30 JELL IFF LN
SOUTHPORT CT
06490 1.482
/
FLORIDA CLEARWATER BEACH
~;~~~
D~&t{~u IA
50309 7230
e
e
ATER BE()CH
HUNTER HOTEL CO
PO BOX 7230
DES 110INES U~
50309 7230
MANDALAY INVESTMENTS
2201 4TH ST N STE 200
ST PETERSBURG Fl
33704 4300
FLORIDA ClE WATER BEACH
HOT
PO
DES
503
MARY G REALTY INC
490 MANDALAY fiVE
ClEf-)RWf-HER FL
33767 2007
J E C FUNDING INC
C/O JACK ECKERD CORP
TAX DEPT
PO BOX 4689
ClEARI....JATER Fl
33/S'8"-4eoM
BRANDENBURGH, JOHN H TRE
BRANDENBURGH, JOAN TRE
37 BfWMONT ST
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1704
....)0 f ....)0 ""tC~..c...) 7
G TRE
B J E INC
678 S GULFVIEW BLVD
ClEARI....,IATER Fl
~37)767 2642
J E
C/O
TAX
PO
CL.E
INC
CORP
337Sg- Y.~8~
OF
~..}..;) (..;)o ~-1.,~(,) '7
YE()RO --
YEAR.
806 1
CLEAr.
R
A
FL
YEAROUl, JPiNE
YEAROUT, .JfiMES
806 NARCISSUS
CLEARWATER BCH Fl
3376'/ 1334
3376'/
PRESTON, MICHAEL G TRE
419 E SHORE DR
CLEARWATER Fl
~53"16 7 2028
DAY, WILLIAM A TRE
1968 lAKEVIEW AVE
DRf-)CUT MA
01e26 3210
STEPHAl'lS, SUSAN
STEPHPiNS, DOR I S
701 TAYLOR ST ~ 508
SAN FR(iNC I SCO C(i
94108 3e25
GIANNAS, SPHW P
GIANNAS, STATHIA P
PO BOX ~3191
HaL I DPN F~L
34690 0191
URINO, MARIE V TRE
466 EAST SHORE DR
CL.EARltoJATER FL
3376"1 2031
POTTER, PASCHOALENA
463 EAST SHORE DR
CLEARl,oIJfHER FL
33767 2033
F~AO, ROCCO A
RAO, DONNA L
1470 CHUKAR RIDGE
PALM HARBOR FL
34683 6456
DAY, WILLIAM A TRE
W A\I'E
POTTER, PASCHOALINA C
C/O A M HORNSBY
PO BOX 2535
SAL I SBURY 11D
2J.802 2535
SOLARI, HUGH
SOLARI, ANN
41 MADELINE ST
BRIGHTON ~1A
02135 2145
e
-
SICILIANO, CONSUELO
SICILIANO, SILVIA
18316 DOLLYBROOK LN
LUTZ FL
33549 5858
EASON, GEORGE H
409 CLARA DR
BRANDON FL
:535.10 3727
JONES, THOMAS A
GOFORTH, BOB C
14 ARLINGTON ST
ASHEVILLE NC
28801 2006
PHILLIPS, HAROLD
PHILLIPS, MARGARET
2459 TWINBROOKE RD
HICKORY NC
28602 872.1
KSIAZEK, STANLEY
KSIAZEK, STAMISLAWA
483 E SHORE DR ~ A-6
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2033
SICILJ(~NO, MAr-nO
SICILIANO-BARBOZA, SYLVIA
18316 DOLLYBROOK LN
LUTZ FL
33549 5858
SICILIANO, MARIO
SICILIANO, CONSUELO
.18316 DOLLYBROOK LN
LUTZ FL
33549 5858
K,ERVIN, JOHN E
MARCHOCKI, SANDRA L
6 KRISTIN CT
HYDE Pf.'IRK i"iA
021?>6 1.103
MAFFEZZOLI, DENNIS
19505 QUESADA AVE N ~ 1518
PT CHARLOTTE FL
33948 3114
CESARONE, J{:\CI<. L
CESARONt~, MARY K.
703 CONCORD LN
Lot1BARD I L
60148 3118
SICILIANO, MARIO
SICI~B , SILVJ{~
1831 L Y LN
un.' Fl.
33549 5858
HORNUNG, NEL.SON
HORNUNG, PEGGY
1401 BRIGADON DR
CLEARI.,1ATEI;;: F'l..
33759 2934
MITCHELL, SALL.Y P
4 SI1ITH ST
CHEL.MSFORD MA
0.1824 1702
FR(.'\NEK, ROSE i'1
PO 80>< 4187
CL.EAF~JMATER FL
33758 4187
FO><, RALPH L III
FO><, JOAN A
39 PINE RIDGE RD
BUZZARDS Bf'-'Y I1A
02:)32 2118
ElANNAN" JOHN N
BANNAN, SUSAN 1'1
5674 WENDY CIR
LOCKPORT NY
14094 6015
MC LAUGHLIN" ANN K TRE
72 MAPLETON ST
BR I GHTOt'1 11~~
02135 2822
HEf'-'L Y, p~nR I CK J
I--IEAL Y, HARY
19 DUNCKLEE ST
BR I GHTON 11A
02135 2116
f-IEAL Y" PATRICK
HEf'-'L_A (.
19 0 C L ST
BRIG
02135 2116
SOLENZIO, STEPHEN M
131 COMHERCIAL PKWY ~ 3A
BRAt'WORD CT
06405 25~59
CHARETTE, RALPH J
CHARETTE, LOIS J
PO BO>< 186
OZONA FL
34660 0186
CORAL HOTEL CONDO ASSN INC
C/O HC ~1ULLEN
PO BO>< 1669
CLEf~RWATEr~ FL
337::,7 1669
MC SWEENEY, JOHN J
MC SWEENEY, KATHLEEN K
309 BAHAMA DR APT C
NORWOOD MA
02062 3830
SICILIANO, ~1ARIO
BARBOZA, VITELLO E
18316 DOLLYBROOK LN
UJTZ FL
~5;5549 5858
e
e
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
November 13, 2001, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City HaIl, 3rd floor, 112 South
Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishinl!: to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetinl!:. Those
cases that are not contested bv the applicant, staff, neil!:hborinl!: property owners, etc. will be placed on a
consent al!:enda and approved bv a sinl!:le vote at the bel!:inninl!: of the meetinl!:.
1. Greenmack Clearwater, LLC. are requesting a flexible development approval to increase the number of
dwelling units from 184 to 200 units as part of a Termination of Status on Nonconformity; increase the permitted
height of the northern building (North Villa) from 30 feet to 130 feet; increase the permitted height of the southern
building (Midrise Villa) from 30 feet to 99 feet; reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement;
reduce the front (west) setback along Mandalay Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet to pavement; reduce the side
(north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement, within the HDR, High Density Residential District (proposed),
as part of a Residential Infill Project (Proposed Use: A 200-unit condominium project including a 130-foot building
(North Villa with 88 units), 99-foot building (Midrise Villa with 112 units) with 25-35 foot townhomes/courtyard
homes and amenities) at 501 Mandalav Avenue, Yacht Basin Sub., Lots 1-9. FL 01-09-31
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the
Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the
Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such
purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105.
AIl individuals speaking on public hearing items wiIl be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review
by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning
Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or caIl (727) 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
Planning Department
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500
FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS A V AILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON
WITH A DISABILITY REOUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO
PARTICIPA TE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR REOUEST
AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 10/27/01
e
e
· Applicant wants the site plan to control the development of the yacht basin site;
· Design Guidelines: applicant meetings with legal and economic development indicated that
the BBD would be dictated by the site plan specifics;
. Design Guidelines:
o Arcade, tree lined;
o Pedestrian friendly;
o Extensive landscaping;
o Parking to be concealed;
o View corridor to Clearwater Harbour along the north side of site;
o Use of pavers to match Mandalay Streetscape;
o 110 foot spacing between North Villa and Midrise Villa;
o Separation between buildings exceeds Design Guidelines; and
o Majority of the public improvements along Mandalaly Avenue are on their property.
Comments: what was the purpose of the public boardwalk? For the general public to use;'
Amendment needs to include the rationale behind these changes. Need to include the benefits the city
will enjoy based on the changes to the adopted plan.
4.
Case: Z 01-09-03 - 501 Mandalay Avenue
Owner/Applicant: Greenmack Clearwater, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company.
Representative: E.D. Armstrong III, Esquire.
Location: 6.164 acres on the east side of Mandalay Avenue and north of Baymont Street.
Atlas Page: 267 A.
Request: Rezoning from MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District to HDR. High
Density Residential District.
Proposed Use: Multi-family residential.
Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner.
Attendees: Lisa Fierce, Gina Clayton, Mark Parry, Tom Glenn, Mike Gust, Don Melone, Dave
Kessinger. Rick Albee, Al Carrier, Etim Udoh, Cyndi Tarapani, Ed Armstrong, Ed Mazur, OC
Cabrera, Ed Mazur, Ed Armstrong, Gregg DeStefano. Rick Gillette
Preliminary comments:
· The amendment will not conflict with the needs and character of the neighborhood and the City.
· The rezoning will not change the actual use of the property as multi-family residential
development, which is appropriate for this neighborhood north Clearwater Beach.
· The proposed amendment will result in the reduction of the existing number of units from 202 to
200 units.
· The proposed HDR zoning is consistent with the existing land use plan designation of Residential
High (RH).
· The proposed rezoning and redevelopment of the Yacht Basin Apartments site may revitalize an
existing neighborhood, increase property values & attractiveness of the City.
· The proposed amendment appears to be consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and
objectives of the Community Development Code.
· Traffic analysis submitted by the applicant for Mandalay Avenue shows a LOS C which indicates
that Mandalay A venue will not be degraded by the proposed redevelopment project.
· The applicant has applied for a Flexible Development approval as part of a Residential Infill
Project to streamline all development requirements.
- - - -- - - -- --- - -- ------ -- ---- -- -- - ----- -- - - --- - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - - --- - - - - - -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- --
5.
Case: FL 01-09-31 - 501 Mandalay Avenue
Applicant: Greenmack Clearwater, LLC.
Location: 6. 164-acres located on the northeast corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street.
DRC action agenda - October 11, 2001 - Page 4
e
e
Atlas Page: 267 A and 258A.
Zoning: HDR, High Density Residential District (pending approval of a companion rezoning
application Z 01-09-03).
Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the number of dwelling units from 184 to
200 units as part of a Termination of Status on Nonconformity; increase the permitted height of
the North Villa (north portion of the site) from 30 feet to 130 feet; increase the permitted height of
the Midrise Villa (south portion of the site) from 30 feet to 99 feet; reduce the side (east) setback
from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement; reduce the front (west) setback along Mandalay Avenue
from 25 feet to zero feet to pavement; reduce the side (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to
pavement, within the HDR, High Density Residential District (proposed), as part of a Residential
1nfill Project.
Proposed Use: Complete redevelopment of the site with a 200-unit, condominium project
located within five buildings including a 130-foot North Villa (88 units), 99-foot high Midrise
Villa (112 units) with townhomes.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
Attendees: Lisa Fierce, Gina Clayton, Mark Parry, Tom Glenn, Mike Gust, Don Melone, Dave
Kessinger, Riek Albee, Al Carrier, Etim Udoh, Cyndi Tarapani, Ed Armstrong, Ed Mazur, OC
Cabrera, Ed Mazur, Ed Armstrong, Gregg DeStefano, Riek Gillette
The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments:
1. Parks and rec: No comments; reduction of units from 202 to 200;
2. Traffic engineering: a) Need to clarify purpose of circular area on north side of Baymont Street-
disrupts sidewalk continuity; b) Need north/south sidewalk continuity at Baymont and Mandalay
intersection (100' offset shown) show prior to COB review. Need to contact Earl Barrett to
discuss and clarify this issue; c) Diagonal, metered, on street parking needed along Baymont.
Parallel parking will be acceptable. Show r.o.w. and geometries along Baymont Street. Show
prior to review by COB; d) Need to show existing sidewalk along entire stretch of Mandalay _
parallel with the road, in addition to the new proposed sidewalk; need to make sidewalk access
easy for all including handicapped residents/tourists e) Parallel parking on Mandalay needs to be
maintained with this proposal; to the extent possible; f) Do not reconfigure BaymontlMandalay
intersection; g) prefer a cul-de-sac at the terminus of Baymont - need to look at the costs/benefits
of this, may not be possible at the present time due to limitations of existing development on the
south side of Baymont; h) Traffic Impact Study should specify net increase in traffic and new
proposed lane configuration of Mandalay - expand the table in the study - prior to issuance of a
building permit but would prefer prior to COB; I) All parking (including handicap) per City
Standards prior to issuance of a building permit;j) Clarify the r.o.w. on Baymont Street
3. Stormwater: a) City Code does not allow for vertical wall ponds or vaults unless there is an undue
hardship; b) Need specific information as to how the underdrain will be maintained. Show prior to
building permit; c) Per City engineer, be more creative in how to obtain greater treatment prior to
discharge to Harbour. Show prior to building permit; d) Would like to see some contact between
the runoff and grass areas/swales to provide additional treatment prior to the vault. Show prior to
building permit; e) Code requires drawdown within 24 hours for dry ponds. Show prior to building
permit; f) Peak tidal influence is at 2.5 - high tide is at about 3.5 - the seawall is at about 4.0 _
how will seawater be kept out of vault. Show prior to building permit;
4. General engineering: a) Need sidewalk and utility easement or commitment from applicant to
maintain it all where proposed on private and public property for public purpose (They maintain it
and the City is liable - shown prior to issuance of CO; b) Vacate easements internal to the site
prior to issuance a building permit OR replat the site prior to CO of first building;
5. Fire - most issues will be worked out prior to issuance of building permits: a) No access to Fire
hydrant and FOC as shown. Must be out at the street with proper FOC's within 40 feet of hydrant
revised prior to issuance of building permit; b) no access to Docks/Marina. Must have tire
protection'systems on docks. Revise prior to issuance of a building permit; c) High-rise buildings
must have high-rise packages; including fire pump, generator, standpipe systems, etc. Show prior
to issuance of a building permit; d) Additional hydrants as may be required. Show prior to
issuance of a building permit; e) Knox gate entry system will be required based on county
DRC action agenda - October 11, 2001 - Page 5
e
e
requirement if gating. Show if applicable prior to issuance of a building permit; f) Additional
hydrants as may be required. Show prior to issuance of a building permit; g) Provide
documentation of available water supply off existing water lines. prior to construction; h) Possible
additional conditions that may develop through further review and information; I) Must design
circulation to for trash trucks and fire trucks to safely maneuver - to continue in a forward motion
- not backing out - prior to review by CDB;
6. Solid waste: a) Plan only shows trash and recycling holding room in center of site - unclear how
all units get their trash to this location. b) Who will pull the containers out? Applicant stated that
maintenance employees will pull out containers (Any roll out is the responsibility of the residents
and up to a maximum of four cubic yards per container); c) Label chute rooms/trash/recycling
rooms on all plans prior to review by CDB; d) Must design circulation to for trash trucks and fire
trucks to safely maneuver - to continue in a forward motion - not backing out - prior to review by
CDB;
7. Land resources: It appears that almost every tree will be removed - this may result in high tree
deficit - this includes two large ficus trees on the site;
8. Other comments: a) Show adjacent streets that abut the site - Baymont. East Shore. Poinsettia. -
on the site plans; b) How will moving vans access this site? Closing off of Baymont and
Mandalay? Only conflict may be on first move in day; c) Unclear design of floors - would like to
see floor by floor plans (these wont be available for the CDB meeting); d) Need to know number
of units in North Villa (96. II and S) and number of units in Midrise Villa (63. 20 and S);
NOTES:
· This case will be forwarded to the CDB for review at its meeting on November 13.2001; need IS sets
of revised plans and the application with sealed survey by Monday. October ISh.
. Fax to Ed Mazur at 724.8606.
6.
Case: ANX 01-09-27 - 1262 Brookside Drive
Owners/Applicants: Eric M. Zebley & Calista A. Zebley
Location: 0.24 acres on the west side of Brookside Road. approximately 110 feet south of north
of Lakeview Road.
Atlas Page: 308A.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 0.24 acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Land use Plan amendment from RL. Residential Low (County) to RL. Residential Low
Classification (City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from R-3. Residential Single Family District (County) to LMDR. Low Medium
Density Residential District (Clearwater).
Proposed Use: Existing single-family dwelling.
Presenter: Etim S. Udoh. Senior Planner.
Attendees included: AI Carrier. Lisa Fierce. Mike Gust. Don Melone. Tom Glenn. Etim Udoh.
The applicant did not attend this DRC meeting.
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
This case will be forwarded to the CDB for review at its meeting on November 13.2001
2:15 p.m.
Case: ANX 01-09-28 - 24479 US 19 North
Owners/Applicants: Trent Goss and Jim Goss/Southern Comfort Mobile Home Park
Location: 21.677 acres on the east side of US 19 North. approximately 810 feet north of Sunset
Point Road.
Atlas Page: 255A.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 21.677 acres to the City of Clearwater;
DRC action agenda - October 11, 2001 - Page 6
----
.
.
~
~ITY OF
CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PIANNING
DEVELOPMENT REviEW
HOUSING DIVISION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVlCES
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORlDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVlCES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
August 23, 2001
Mr. E.D. Armstrong, III, Esquire
Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Ruppel & Bums, P.A.
PO Box 1368
Clearwater, Florida 33756-1368 1= .. I:
RE: Complete Application for Flexible Development approval (~
T
Dear Mr. Armstrong:
The Planning staff has reviewed your Flexible Development request to permit increase the
number of dwelling units from 184 to 200 units, increase the permitted height of the North Villa
(north portion of the site) from 30 feet to 130 feet, increase the height of the Midrise Villa (south
portion of the site) from 30 feet to 100 feet, reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to zero
feet to pavement, reduce the front (west) setback along Mandalay Avenue from 25 feet to zero
feet to pavement, reduce the side (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement and
increase the number of dwelling units from 184 units to 200 units within the HDR, High Density
Residential District (proposed), as part of a Residential Infill Project at 501 Mandalay Avenue.
After a preliminary review of the submitted items, Staff has determined that the application is
complete. The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned
the case number: FL 01-09-31.
The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on October 11,
2001 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
municipal service building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue in Clearwater. Please call Amy Ruscher at
562.4579 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your
case will be reviewed.
You or a representative must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have
regarding your application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4558.
Sincerely yours,
.!
r .vJ<--""""
.. '\
! 7
Mark T. Parry
Planner
S:\Planning Department\C D BlFlex\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\Mandalay 501 Catalina Townhomes\Mandalay 501
Complete. doc
"
BIMN J. Al'Nc;sT, MAYOR-CO\I:1l1SSIOI\ER
[I) H..lln, VICE lvIAYOR-CO:\I\lISSIONER WHITNEY GRW, COVI\lISS10NE1{
HOlT HA\11LTON, CO\1.\IISSIOi\EI{ @ I3ILLJOI\SON, CO\t\lISSIONER
"EQIAL EMI'LOYMEN:T AND AFF1R,\l"TIVE ACTION: E:llf'LOnr\"
IJI
.
.
do. .............. .......-......
.... ~l0h~J:/m_ ...~_~ &n- 6(:> D? <
. ;; 0Xi)J'(, ~ ~ClC 12 + __...k~.
~.~-; ......~ ?r. ~ d!\-. ~ ... .- - - . . ·
OC-tA .. D - ... ...... ... t< ... ... ~---- ....~ .
"-
~~;~~,,~-....~..~.....
'..~_ .YbL~a~..~. ---~
~ .eg~...~0~ ..~ 66D--- ...
.- N~~d .U$ €~-\- ~.~
-.c-Y1~. ~ ,-~.., ,,~~ ~ ~. ~
.~'.............
t(~~ ...~......Yy\_\~. ~ ~
\f~UAh\./L. ~lvvvt-
. .... . .~ .. ....ElL...
- . ...~. ~...ty'J! ..&;;0 ~..._ ....... .~_~
~v~
- ~-h~- YlWJ:i~emJ.s. ~t~
CJVyj(t ~..~lvY / .... . .. . ~.- /
- ..jvy. tc .~1J _..~~ -
. ~
~. ~~~~~'b~. 4~WJ4
.. ....-::-:.:...===:=.----.--...... ...._...... _.._ .............,... ......._m..._______.._.._ ...._.__ ._....._......... ......w..... ......_...... ... ....____.._........___..... . .......
.
.
-=~~~'cI) NDl~~~
,~ffiy;cb-~ ~~.. :6ci~~~~-~--~~
._~.- ..~ ~ V\&11:-t ....~d___..H
.-:: .Du..~...~*.~ 10m ~.~~~m~t
~.-lan. ~ ..~. ~~~k:0J0~ .~
...~lL-_~~ --..~k<ld.
.kt=....;+- ( ~
... ..-~ ~.. ~ ..
._.i1~~~ VVJm~ . .....
~..~ ~Wi1E?
... I..... .. .... ". ................ ....... '.' .... .............. ..... .'...
............._.."........ ..'_.. .."............c_....".. ..... J
,
,. ~.
C T \- 0 F
t.: .t ~R W ATE R
November 27, 2001 .
Armstrong - Page Two
~
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BrJX 4748, CIF.ARW^TER, FwwlO,\ 33'/ j)~-4748
MVNICIl'A1. SERVICES B\JJWING, IOU SOIJTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, F,nRJD^ _~37S6
THErHoNE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
The proposal includes the complete redevelopment of the site including the demolition of
the existing 202 units. The project includes a 200-unit condominium project with on-~:te
amenities and abundant landscaping. There will be 98 units within the 130-foot Nonh
Villa and 62 units in the 99-foot Midrise Villa. The remaining 40 units wiJl be located in
the tWQ- and three-story townhomes located along the perimeter of the site. The proposal
also includes streetscape improvements along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street.
LONG RANGE PIMlNING
[JEVELOPMEN1" REVIEW
r lOUSING DIVISION
NE1GHRORHOon SERVICES
November 27,2001
Mr. E.D. Armstrong, ill, Esquire
Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Ruppel & Bums, P.l:JL.E
PO Box 1368
Clearwater, Florida 33756-1368
RE: Development Order regarding case FL 01-09-31 at 501 Mandalay Avenue
L
Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Community Development
Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for aODroval:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuanl to Section 4-206 D.6 of the
Community Development Code. On November 13, 2001, the Community Development
Board reviewed your Flexible Development request to permit the following within the
(pending) HDR, High Density Residential District, as part of a Residential Infill Project
under the provisions of Section 2-504:
1. The proposal, as amended with respect to height, complies with Flexible
Development and Residential Infill Project criteria under the provisions of Section 2-
504;
2. The project, as amended, complies with General Applicability Criteria under the
provisions of Section 3-913;
3. The plan, as amended, comptie~ with ~; e 'lermination of Status as a Nonconformity
under the provisions of Section ?-10~' B; .md
4. The proposed developm~t, aJ al~nde.;j is consistent with the companion
amendments to Beach by De~i,~rl Jn~ tile rezOning appl:cation for HDR District.
..
Dear Mr. Armstrong:
Increase in the number of dwelling units from 184 to 200 units under the provisions
of Section 64109 B, as a Termination of Status as a Nonconformity;
Increase the permitted height of the North Villa (north portion of the site) from 30 feet
to 130 feet;
. Increase the height of the Midrise Villa (south portion of the site) from 30 feet to 99
feet;
Reduction in the side (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement;
. Reduction in the side (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement;
Reduction in the front (west) setback along Mandalay Avenue from 25 feet to zero
feet to pavement;
Reduction in the front (south) setback along Baymont Street from 25 feet to 18 feet
for building; and
Reduction in the front (south) setback along Baymont Street from 25 feet to zero feet
for pavement.
Conditions of aooroval:
1. That the companion BC.';.~h oy Desi.'!1' Spe~lal Area Plan anJ rezoning amendments be
approved by the City Cc,~11r.jssioflj
2. That the density be limi..(.~".c 200 dwellings units;
3, That a contribution to a f: ;f~.(': nc"k1ng g3i":ge in tte are<i be made, as determined by
the City Commission; ..--
4. That the streetscape imprt "CllV~n~:; be installed within two phases; Phase One
includes the area along ManJaJay Avenue north of the entrance of the site, to be
completed prior to the issuance of '.hf. last Certificate of Occupancy for the North
Villa; Phase Two includes the Baymont Street frontage and the balance of Mandalay
Avenue (south of the entrance), to be installed prior to the issuance of the last
Certificate of Occupancy of the Midrise Villa;
5. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
6. That solid waste and stonnwater management requirements to be met, prior to
issuance of building permits;
7. That a setback reduction for all structures including swimming pools, spas and
pavement along the seawall be secured through application to the Board of
Adjustment and Appeal for Building and Flood, as necessary, prior to issuance of
building permits;
BMI,\N t. A"M;sr. MA\'OM.(OM,\II.'\SIONDI:
~ :J~'^;~;"~:.\': l~ ~.;;,:.~;~~~~.:~:,~( lNEM WI~;I~I~~ )~;:.~:: ~: :.::~::~~:: :~:::
*
"EQlj^1. EMI'I.()Y~lENT ^NI) AI'I'IRW\llVE A(:TIOi'l EMPLOYEIl"
November 27,2001
Armstrong - Page Three
Conditions of aporoval (continued):
8. That all sign age comply with Code; and
9. That any future dock request meet Code requirements including review by CDB under
a separate application.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one
year of Flexible Development approval (November 13, 2002) and all required certificates
of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building
permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community
Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period nol to exceed one year
and only within the original period of validity.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the
necessity to obtain any building pennits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In
order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please
bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require
this priOf development approval.
In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible
Development) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the
subject of the approval within 14 days of the date the Development Order is issued. The
filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the
final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on November
30, 2001.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 562-4558.
fVr
~~.
Gerald Figurski. Chairman
Community Development Board
CC. Mr. David Mack, Greenmack Clearwater, LLC
5:\/,/(111111119 Dep(lrlml!l1t\C D S\Flexv/llwrlive or FiniS/led Applimlitm~Wand(lI(lY 501 Cmalin(l Y"wTlIt(Jmu. AppmveJ\M(lnd(l/ay
501 DEVEWPMENTORDER.dlK
j
CITY OF CLEh:RWATER
November 27,2001
Armstrong - Page Two
loNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMEtrr REVlF.W
HOUSING DIVISiON
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
PmT OfFICE Box 4748, CIHRWATEl, FIDIlIDA 33758.4748
MUNICIPAL Sf.RVlCF.5 BUILDING, 100 SolJrH MYRTI.f. AVENUE, C!.F.....RWATER. FI.ORJDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
November 27,2001
The proposal includes the complete redevelopment of the site including the demolition of
the existing 202 units. The project includes a ZOO-unit condominium project with on-site
amenities and abundant landscaping. There will be 98 units within the 130-foot North
Villa and 62 units in the 99-foot Midrise Villa. The remaining 40 units will be located in
the two- and three-story townhomes located along the perimeter of the site. The proposal
also includes streetscape improvements along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street.
ILE
Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Community Development
Board (COB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Mr. E.O. Armstrong, ill, Esquire F
Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Ruppel & Bum
PO Box 1368
Clearwater, Florida 33756-1368
Bases for aooroval:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.6 of the
Community Development Code. On November 13, 2001, the Community Development
Board reviewed your Flexible Development request to pennit the following within the
(pending) HDR, High Density Residential District, as part of a Residential Infill Project
under the provisions of Section 2-504:
1. The proposal, as amended with respect to height, complies with Flexible
Development and Residential Infill Project criteria under the provisions of Section 2-
504;
2. The project, as amended, complies with General Applicability Criteria under the
provisions of Section 3-913;
3. The plan, as amended, complies with the Tennination of Status as a Nonconfonnity
under the provisions of Section 6-109 B; and
4. The proposed development, as amended, is consistent with the companion
amendments to Beach by Design and the rezoning appJication for HDR District.
RE: Development Order regarding ~d:)(; u.. VA.-V.... J1 ... jOt Mandalay Avenue
Dear Mr. Armstrong:
lncrease in the number of dwelling units from 184 to 200 units under the provisions
of Section 6-109 B, as a Termination of Status as a Nonconformity;
. Increase the permitted height of the North Villa (north portion of the site) from 30 feet
to 130 feet;
lncrease the height of the Midrise Villa (south portion of the site) from 30 feet to 99
feet;
. Reduction in the side (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement;
. Reduction in the side (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement;
Reduction in the front (west) setback along Mandalay Avenue from 25 feet to zero
feet to pavement;
. Reduction in the front (south) setback along Baymont Street from 25 feet to 18 feet
for building; and
Reduction in the front (south) setback along Baymont Street from 25 feet to zero feet
for pavement.
Conditions of aooroval:
1. That the companion Beach by Design Special Area Plan and rezoning amendments be
approved by the City Commission;
2. That the density be limited to 200 dwellings units;
3. That a contribution to a future parking garage in the area be made, as determined by
the City Commission;
4. That the streetscape improvements be installed within two phases: Phase One
includes the area along Mandalay Avenue north of the entrance of the site, to be
completed prior to the issuance of the last Certificate of Occupancy for the North
Villa; Phase Two includes the Baymont Street frontage and the balance of Mandalay
Avenue (south of the entrance), to be installed prior to the issuance of the last
Certificate of Occupancy of the Midrise Villa;
5. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the COB;
6. That solid waste and stonnwater management requirements to be met, prior to
issuance of building permits;
7. That a setback reduction for all structures including swimming pools, spas and
pavement along the seawall be secured through application to the Board of
Adjustment and Appeal for Building and Flood, as necessary, prior to issuance of
building pennits;
UNIAN ,. ^lJM:'~T. M^,'OR-C()~U.IlS.~I()NF.1l
J~1l HAil", VICf. MAYOII.Cml.\USSWmf.M Wllfrr.:f.Y GkW, CO.\lMISS10"f.1I
Hun. HAMII.l.O,,", Cf)J>l~IIS"'("'f.1I * UIlJ.J()fl;Sm~, ClIMloll~SI()">;f.lI
"EQUAl. EIoll'WYMF.NT ANn Al'fIlIMA11VF. AC110N EMPllnHt"
November 27, 2001
Armstrong - Page Three
Zoning Approved
CITY OF CLEARWATER
BY P~ DEPT.
DATE 3ii1=
Conditions of aooTOval (continued):
8. That all signage comply with Code; and
9. That any future dock request meet Code requirements including review by CDB under
a separate application.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building pennit shall be made within one
year of Flexible Development approval (November 13, 2002) and all required certificates
of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building
permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community
Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year
and only within the original period of validity.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the
necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In
order to facilitate the issuance of any pennit or license affected by this approval, please
bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require
this prior development approval.
In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible
Development) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the
subject of the approval within 14 days of the date the Development Order is issued. The
filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the
final determination of the case. The appeal period faT your case will expire on November
30,200!.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 562-4558.
p-
':?ry ~';:J9r' _ _
O;wu/~-k'
Gerald Figurski, Chainnan
Community Development Board
ce. Mr. David Mack, Greenmack Clearwater, LLC
S:\P/tlllIl;/It Dtpartmr/lf\C D If\Flr:Nunaflivr ar Fill;sllrd Applic(I/irmiIMQnd(llay 501 CQ/Qlina Townlwmu. A.pprov~dlMQndQIQ,!
501 DEVELOFMENTORDER.doc