FLD2002-11043
~"
.
.
CASE #: i=L.D'~ o&..-- i fO"l2
DATE RECE~ 2..\]Cl'2.-
RECEIVED BY (staff init als): liUW
ATLAS PAGE #: 2-~..r A
ZONING DISTRICT: ...,-
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: KF-U
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
,
~ Clearwater
-~
o~
Planning and Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
, SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
.6 SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans
rd' SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ I ~ T. f\)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 3/29/01)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. AUn: Housh Ghovaee
MAILING ADDRESS: 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, Florida 33755
PHONE NUMBER: (727) 443-2869
FAX NUMBER: (727) 446-8036
rn--'~~'-
'I :') 'I' F; i
Ii iJ I "
II" ,
Ii j
" !
I J Il
1'-')
t Fu
'-7i7..-r,-::;---, '
\ U !~" I~
\ - :'.,,~~~~~ II
/, I!
: ;!
, ,I
I
, ) ) i
i--/ I
PROPERTY OWNER (S): Burnaby Welch Corporation, Florida corporation
(Must include ALL owners)
DE~ 2 n 2002
!: ;
-_.__.~
- ''';:., j
AGENT NAME: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc,
MAILING ADDRESS: 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930, Clearwater, Florida 33755
PHONE NUMBER: (727) 443-2869 FAX NUMBER: (727) 446-8036
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS: 692 Bayway Boulevard
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 21, 22 and 23, Block A, Bayside Subdivision No.5
PARCEL NUMBER: 17/29/15/05004/001/0210 + i, JZ Cf )\S)OSO 04-/0 OJ /0 L3 C
PARCEL SIZE: .51 acres, 22,440 Square feet (MOL)
(Acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: 15 condominium units, 3 stories above open parking (4 stories total)
(Number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (S): To construct a three-story, 15 unit condominium above open parking with front setback reductions from
15' to 5' to dumpster enclosure and to elevator, from 15' to 9.0' to stairwell on southwest side, from 15' to 9.5' to stairwell
on southeast side, and side setback reductions from 10' to 5' for a pool equipment room, from 10' to 8.1' to stairwell on west, from 10' to 5.
and 5.7' for pavement on western side, from 10 feet to 9.5 feet for pavement on eastern side and rear yard setback reductions from 20' to
zero feet for pool decking and walkway and from 20' to 10' for an open pool. Additionally we are requesting an increase in the allowable
height from 35' to 41,66',
(Include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
".,
-
-
..
C, PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it s
located.
See Exhibit A attached
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
See Exhibit A attached
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
See Exhibit A attached
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
See Exhibit A attached
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
See Exhibit A attached
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
See Exhibit A attached
o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTCRITERIA (as applicable):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
See Exhibit A attached
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements. )
See Exhibit A attached
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
See Exhibit A attached
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
See Exhibit A attached
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
See Exhibit A attached
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
" .
.
.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
See Exhibit A attached
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
See Exhibit A attached
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
See Exhibit A attached
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
See Exhibit A attached
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
See Exhibit A attached
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required;
o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY.
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines.)
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
','
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 10'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y:z X 11) and color rendering if possible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborisr, of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
e
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y:. X 11) (color rendering if possible);
o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y:. Xii) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
I. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 Y:. X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
J, TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
K. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authoriz City representatives to visit and photograph the property
describ in this application.
~",\I'"I"'/,,1,
~"~ro'Qta Ann Ii.:> ~III~
~ v ........ "'/'~. ~
~ ...~...\lI\SSI0N ;~.lS' ~
.... . '0"" \ 15 '-1':... ..,
~ ..~\J ~~s !~ ~.. ~
~ . G.b:~. ~
nature of property owner or rep@> ative... : * ::
~~~ #CC863281 i~~
~ ~.. tit ..~~
~~/_..J,>O onded\\\~c'l> ..r!f~
~ rA..~ f'ain-lnsUlal'< .. <:-v i:f-
~ ~ .........,,1(, ~
;11111 Z/C, STAi't. v:\",,,
~/"'II"""\\"~
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS tb
worn to and subscribed before me this ~day of
O-~ - ~Y-, A.D. 20~ to me and/or by
" lJ6 :e~, who <is::'" personally known~
produced'---- as
identification.
~lA.~\- I I }L~0
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.'.
.'
.
.
Exhibit A
Written Submittal Requirements (Section 3-913.A)
1. The subject site is located within the Clearwater Pass District as designated by
the Beach by Design program. This area consists of a mix of high-rise
condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and retail uses, Considering
the existing mix of uses within the immediate area, the proposed four-story
condominium, (3 floors ofliving space above an open parking area) will be in
harmony with the scale and bulk and character of adjacent properties.
2, The proposed project will not hinder or discourage appropriate development
of the immediate area due to several reasons, The proposed condominium project
is revitalizing a site that is currently occupied by a 24-unit motel and gravel open
parking area, The replacement of the existing overnight-accommodation use with
a owner occupied use will certainly help to reduce the number of transient tenants
within the area, lending to a more desirable "beach community" atmosphere,
Existing parking areas on site which spill out into the right-of-way will be
removed and all required parking will be provided on site underneath the
proposed structure, The applicant is providing more parking than required by
Code in order to accommodate residents with more than one vehicle per family.
Providing parking on site will help to encourage new growth in the area, as it will
work to lessen traffic congestion along Bayway Boulevard.
3. The health and safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood will
not be adversely affected, as this will be a residential use, generating a minimal
amount of traffic. Additionally, ingress and egress to and from the site will be
provided via a two-way driveway and all visibility triangles will be maintained,
4, The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion by all
required parking being provided on site and by constructing the proposed two-
way driveway leading to the parking area All existing parking spaces which
currently require vehicles to back out into the Bayway Boulevard right-of-way
will be removed,.
5. The proposed condominium project will be a good mix for the immediate
vicinity as it is replacing an existing overnight accommodation use, is considered
a mid-level high-rise and not a high-rise lending to a well balanced streetscape.
High-rise buildings exist within the immediate area, which exceed the height
proposed herein.
6, The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse visual affects due
to its mid-level stature and open parking area. No acoustic or olfactory adverse
impacts are anticipated due to the nature ofthe proposed residential use as
opposed to other more intense possible uses for the site such as retail sales or
overnight accommodations. The encroaching stairwells in the front will aid in
providing visual relief as opposed to a solid "fortress type" flat fac;ade, Even the
proposed dumpster location will be screened with an enclosure that will be
architecturally compatible with the exterior of the proposed condominium
building.
, .
.
e
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria
1. In order for the development of the subject site to be economically
feasible, the proposal of 15 condominium units is necessary, Additionally, the
requested setback reductions are necessary in order to provide potential
homeowners the type, size and quality of upscale waterfront living that they are
looking for. The lack of certain amenities such as a pool and deck area along the
waterfront would make it difficult to market the condominium units. The
proposed pool width of 15 feet is a requirement of the Pinellas County Health
Department for all commercial pools, as is the distance of five feet from the pool
to the building itself. The front yard setback reductions being requested will
provide the necessary exterior stairwells, an elevator access for the homeowners
on site and will provide for a common enclosed dumpster location. No other area
on the subject site can provide for the necessary dumpster/enclosure and still
provide required access to the dumpster by the City's Sanitation department.
2. The development of the su15ject site as proposed herein will only work to
improve the value of abutting properties. Currently the assessed value of the
subject site is $1,285,300.00, Upon completion of the proposed project, the
proposed value of the site with the improvements is estimated to be
$7,500,000.00,
3, The proposed use is a permitted use within the City of Clearwater and
more specifically within the Tourist zoning district. Additionally, this proposed
residential condominium use fits into the vision of Beach by Design by being part
of the desire for strategic revitalization and renovation of the Clearwater Pass
District.
4. The proposed use is compatible with adjacent land uses especially when
referring to the Beach by Design program and knowing that the proposed
residential use is going to be less intense than that of the existing overnight
accommodation use on site, Less traffic and noise will be generated by the
proposed residential use. The requested setback reductions on site are consistent
for the immediate area and are even less intrusive than other surrounding uses as
significant lush landscaping is being provided and less pavement will be on site as
opposed to the existing motel use. The proposed height of 41.66' is compatible
with surrounding uses, as the varying height will lend to a pleasing streetscape as
opposed to a "fortress" effect.
5. Other suitable sites for the type of upscale waterfront residential living
being proposed are not readily available at this time.
6. The development proposed for this site will in fact upgrade the immediate
vicinity based on the proposed property value at time of completion and the fact
that the proposed units will be occupied by homeowners as opposed to transient
tenants, In addition to the new construction on site, landscaping will be
significantly upgraded on site which will in turn lend to the immediate vicinity
being positively impacted,
7. The proposed design ofthe subject project will draw a high-end type of
homeowner looking for quality waterfront living which in turn will benefit the
. .
,
.
.
.1 .
City as a whole. The proposed condominium structure and landscaping should be
an incentive to other property owners within the area to improve and/or redevelop
their sites,
8. The requested reductions in required setbacks will allow the site to be
developed with a project consistent with other existing setbacks within the
Clearwater Pass district while at the same time along with the proposed
landscaping helping to differentiate the area from other beach communities.
9, The proposed project is going to provide more than the required amount of
parking on site as opposed to many older uses within the area where on-street
parking is a necessity, This proposed on-site parking will help to lessen traffic
congestion along Bayway Boulevard.
10, The proposed use complies with the Design Guidelines of Beach by
design in that it will be providing pleasing architecture in a tropical vernacular;
creating a sense of a beach community neighborhood; landscaping of all vehicular
use areas so that the view of the parking area is determined by landscaping and
not just pavement and ensuring that the street level of the building is pedestrian
friendly and that all visibility triangles are being maintained,
I
Sent By: NOATHSIDE ENGINEERING SEA.' S,' 72
74468036;
18 Oct 02.54AM;JOb 281 ;page 2/2
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with R.l'Ihsidl
_"'rill ServiCIS, IIC. to act as an agent for bJ?!..) 1\6 f lu2 \(.k Co j2 r)
(Property Owner's Name)
And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits
~/~l
S!9!lature of ErQ~rty Owner
P\l$ \\:>CNl
lJf=l f~LJA~ RLV (')
Address Property Owner
an<;t approvals for the construction on th~ property generally located on the
o c1?-. l1A'I vAi Q.w \) C 'tV! /lVA'\(";~ I F L-
Lc-lls ;> I, ))... -( ;) 3, 'Sl(~(. A 0A;/ S,'de .5dT). ,lying within
r-:-J (Property location) ,
rl re \ \ A So County, State of -f-=-' 0 Il, ~ A-
fCe. &JC'N:=\B1 w t=.U::.H c..t.:>{cp,
~\.'r;l?>S~ c, lRO,r'S? .
Print Name of Property Owner
_,:;)1 ~) -U<:::LJS .-.L Lf:
Telephone Number
CI l=t'lk?.w Ir~ T Gi("
City/State/Zip Code
PL 33.7~.')
State of PI o(LA.~1t-
County of p) rJ (LAl.lt~
~oregoing instrument was aCkno, wledge before me I, his .3 ~ day
o ' ~12oO~by ~JS~WIJ~S,~,L~
who is personally known to me or who has prOducedfL h L-..
as identification and who die take an oath.
Commission #
Notary Public
(Si
(SEAl ABOVE)
.._ (Name 0TN0
-
.
.
PROJECT NAME:
The Islander
PROJECT NO. :
248
j J
! ~
i \. 1
DEl. 2 0 2002
. ,
I
,
I__-/
i
.1
(C'
o ;,t,~~;,:~,t, I "-'~ 01
c",ti. \'1-\ I L.;{
~..... .....:<':.;0-.:......'&>;,"'""-1
,-~
I >'j-'
POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA:
BOT. EL.=
STAGE AREA AREA STORAGE
ft-NGVD SF AC CF
3.00 528 0.0121 0
3.25 588 0,0135 140
3.50 648 0.0149 294
3.75 708 0.0163 464
4,00 768 0,0176 648
4.25 828 0.0190 848
4.50 888 0.0204 1,062
4.75 948 0.0218 1,292
4.85 972 0.0223 1,390
5.00 1008 0.0231 1,536
T.V. EL. =
TOP EL.
TOTAL QUALITY CALCULATIONS:
DRAINAGE AREA =
22,242 SF
REQUIRED WATER QULlTY DEPTH =
3/4 IN
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME =
1,390 CF
PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION =
4.85 FT
AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY =
1390 CF
fL~ A.~
Ft- "E." *47'131
.
.
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
PROJECT: THE ISLANDER
PROJECT NO.:
248
VOLUME PROVIDED (CF)= 1,390
BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 4,85 POND AREA (SF) = 972
BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 3,00 POND AREA (SF) = 528
UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 2,00
K= 0.09 (FT.lMIN.)
LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN (FT) = 10
ELEV. TOTAL INCR L (AV) HG FILTER FLOW POND INCR INCR
FT HEAD HEAD (FT) AREA (CFM) AREA VOL. TIME
4.85 972
2.37 0.46 2.75 0.86 15 1.16 424 365
4.39 861
1.91 0.46 2.75 0.69 15 0.94 373 398
3,93 750
1.44 0.46 2,75 0.53 15 0.71 321 453
3.46 639
0.98 0.46 2.75 0.36 15 0.48 270 560
3.00 528
TIME =
1,776 MINUTES
TIME =
29.6 HOURS
P-~A-. ~
F L Pe JF'17'12>1
.
.
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
25 YEAR STORM EVENT
PROJECT: THE ISLANDER
PROJECT NO, 248
RUN-OFF COEFFICIENTS
PRE-CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
22,242 SF
14,256 SF OF IMP. AREA@ C =
o SF OF POND AREA @ C =
7,986 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.95
1
0.2
C=
0.68
POST -CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
22,242 SF
15,370 SF OF IMP. AREA@ C =
1,008 SF OF POND AREA @ C =
5,864 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.95
1
0.2
C=
0.75
STORAGE CALCULATION
PRE-CONSTRUCTION
AREA (ACRES) = 0.51
TIME OF CONC. Tc (MIN.)= 10
I @ Te =10 (IN/HR)(25 YEAR EVENT)= 8.50
Q(out) = Q @ Tc (CFS) = 2.95
POST -CONSTRUCTION
TIME I Q(in) INFLOW OUTFLOW STORAGE
(MIN.) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (CF) (CF)
10.00 8.50 3.27 1,965 1,773 192
15.00 7.30 2.81 2,531 2,659 -128
20.00 6.50 2.50 3,005 3,545 -540
30.00 5.40 2.08 3,745 5,318 -1,573
40.00 4.60 1.77 4,253 7,091 -2,837
50.00 4.00 1.54 4,623 8,863 -4,240
60.00 3.60 1.39 4,993 10,636 -5,643
MAX. STORAGE =
192 CF
WEIR DESIGN
TOP. OF WEIR ELEV.=
BOT. OF WEIR ELEV.=
H=
Q=
5.00 FT
4.85 FT
0.15 FT
2.95 CFS
L=Q/3.3*H^1.5 =
15.41 FT
WATER QUALITY DEPTH =
0.75 in.
WATER QUALITY =
TOTAL POST CONST. AREA* DEPTH * 1ft/12in=
1,390 CF
R-~ A. ~
f-L p~ JI: '-17431
.
.
~ Clearwater
u~
~
Planning and Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
CASE #: 2..-~ 0 2,... ~
DATE RECEIVED: 2.. 0
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #: L>>A
ZONING DISTRICT: \
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: (~.
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
@
SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
@
SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans
SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 120S. <TV
,
@
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 3/29/01)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Attn: Housh Ghovaee
MAILING ADDRESS: 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, Florida 33755
PHONE NUMBER: (727) 443-2869
FAX NUMBER: (727) 446-8036
PROPERTY OWNER (S): Burnaby Welch Corporation, Florida corporation
(Must include ALL owners)
AGENT NAME: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS: 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930, Clearwater, Florida 33755
PHONE NUMBER: (727) 443-2869 FAX NUMBER: (727) 446-8036
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS:
692 Bayway Boulevard
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lots 21, 22 and 23, Block A, Bayside Subdivision No.5
17/29/15/05004/001/0210 "" \ 7 ) Z. , lIS J OSO'f# '+- /0 C ./oz.. > (l
PARCEL NUMBER:
PARCEL SIZE:
.51 acres, 22,440 Square feet (MOL)
(Acres, square feet)
15 condominium units, 3 stories above open parking (4 stories total)
(Number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (S): To construct a three-story, 15 unit condominium above open parking with front setback reductions from
15' to 5' to dumpster enclosure and to elevator, from 15' to 9.0' to stairwell on southwest side, from 15' to 9.5' to stairwell
on southeast side, and side setback reductions from 10' to 5' for a pool equipment room, from 10' to 8.1' to stairwell on west, from 10' to 5.
and 5.7' for pavement on western side, from 10 feet to 9.5 feet for pavement on eastern side and rear yard setback reductions from 20' to
zero feet for pool decking and walkway and from 20' to 10' for an open pool.
(Include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _X_ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
e
. C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
@ SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY
D WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
] Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it s
located.
See Exhibit A attached
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
See Exhibit A attached
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
See Exhibit A attached
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
See Exhibit A attached
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
See Exhibit A attached
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
See Exhibit A attached
I
~ Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTCRITERIA (as applicable):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
See Exhibit A attached
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
See Exhibit A attached
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
See Exhibit A attached
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
See Exhibit A attached
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
See Exhibit A attached
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
See Exhibit A attached
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
See Exhibit A attached
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
See Exhibit A attached
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
See Exhibit A attached
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
See Exhibit A attached
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
@ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
@ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
@ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required;
@ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY.
@ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines.)
@ GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
e
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
@ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 1 0'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
@ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
@ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) and color rendering if possible;
@ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
· G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
"
@ LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
@ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) (color rendering if possible);
@ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
@ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
@ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
@ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 y, X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
I. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
@ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
@ Reduced signage proposal (8 y, X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
@ Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this re~~rnrnn~h
~..... ~a q/; . if,;
S . s/o" z
~ ,,'~\>l-\S tv ~-i" ~
~ .. (jCi ,,~'O\ 15, <'a ~... ~
. :::- : ~ ~.., ~ ~ . ....,
I, the underSigned, acknowledge that all representations fSIqe~rT>lh1S S'r~i.@F FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS /5 E::..
application are true and accurate to the best of my knoYil~ge and ... Sw~ n = 0 and subscribed before me this _ day of
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph tl\~~perttcC863281: N, A.D. 20(1 ~ to _,rn~_ ..!!J1QIQL by
described in this application. ~~;" ~ 8onded\\>.... <>'" . V; et:. who is ~ally,. ,kn"o.,wn'~
~ ')'r ..~YFain-lnS\l~<.".. d "''''
~ ,..0& ......... e as
iflllllLle, SI~\"'~~,"tification.
1111/11I11\1\\\\
AP , VEO
F
TR FFIC
BY:
DIE'
K. SIGNATURE:
l,-'C~
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
e
.
L. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
, personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
S:\Planning DepartmenflApplication Formsldevelopment reviewlcomprehensive intill application2.doc
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
Exhibit A
Written Submittal Requirements (Section 3-913.A)
1, The subject site is located within the Clearwater Pass District as designated by
the Beach by Design program. This area consists of a mix of high-rise
condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and retail uses. Considering
the existing mix of uses within the immediate area, the proposed four-story
condominium, (3 floors ofliving space above an open parking area) will be in
harmony with the scale and bulk and character of adjacent properties,
2. The proposed project will not hinder or discourage appropriate development
of the immediate area due to several reasons, The proposed condominium project
is revitalizing a site that is currently occupied by a 24-unit motel and gravel open
parking area. The replacement of the existing overnight-accommodation use with
a owner occupied use will certainly help to reduce the number of transient tenants
within the area, lending to a more desirable "beach community" atmosphere.
Existing parking areas on site which spill out into the right-of-way will be
removed and all required parking will be provided on site underneath the
proposed structure. The applicant is providing more parking than required by
Code in order to accommodate residents with more than one vehicle per family.
Providing parking on site will help to encourage new growth in the area, as it will
work to lessen traffic congestion along Bayway Boulevard.
3. The health and safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood will
not be adversely affected, as this will be a residential use, generating a minimal
amount of traffic. Additionally, ingress and egress to and from the site will be
provided via a two-way driveway and all visibility triangles will be maintained.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion by all
required parking being provided on site and by constructing the proposed two-
way driveway leading to the parking area All existing parking spaces which
currently require vehicles to back out into the Bayway Boulevard right-of-way
will be removed,.
5, The proposed condominium project will be a good mix for the immediate
vicinity as it is replacing an existing overnight accommodation use, is considered
a mid-level high-rise and not a high-rise lending to a well balanced streetscape.
6, The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse visual affects due
to its mid-level stature and open parking area. No acoustic or olfactory adverse
impacts are anticipated due to the nature of the proposed residential use as
opposed to other more intense possible uses for the site such as retail sales or
overnight accommodations. The encroaching stairwells in the front will aid in
providing visual relief as opposed to a solid "fortress type" flat fayade, Even the
proposed dumpster location will be screened with an enclosure that will be
architecturally compatible with the exterior of the proposed condominium
building,
.
.
'.
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria
1. In order for the development of the subject site to be economically
feasible, the proposal of 15 condominium units is necessary. Additionally, the
requested setback reductions are necessary in order to provide potential
homeowners the type, size and quality of upscale waterfront living that they are
looking for. The lack of certain amenities such as a pool and deck area along the
waterfront would make it difficult to market the condominium units, The
proposed pool width of 15 feet is a requirement of the Pinellas County Health
Department for all commercial pools, as is the distance of five feet from the pool
to the building itself. The front yard setback reductions being requested will
provide the necessary exterior stairwells, an elevator access for the homeowners
on site and will provide for a common enclosed dumpster location, No other area
on the subject site can provide for the necessary dumpster/enclosure and still
provide required access to the dump.ster by the City's Sanitation department.
2, The development of the su1:5ject sife as proposed herein will only work to
improve the value of abutting properties. Currently the assessed value of the
subject site is $1,285,300,00. Upon completion of the proposed project, the
proposed value of the site with the improvements is estimated to be
$7,500,000,00.
3. The proposed use is a permitted use within the City of Clearwater and
more specifically within the Tourist zoning district. Additionally, this proposed
residential condominium use fits into the vision of Beach by Design by being part
of the desire for strategic revitalization and renovation of the Clearwater Pass
District.
4. The proposed use is compatible with the with adjacent land uses especially
when referring to the Beach by Design program and knowing that the proposed
residential use is going to be less intense than that of the existing overnight
accommodation use on site. Less traffic and noise will be generated by the
proposed residential use, The requested setback reductions on site are consistent
for the immediate area and are even less intrusive than other surrounding uses as
significant lush landscaping is being provided and less pavement will be on site as
opposed to the existing motel use,
5. Other suitable sites for the type of upscale waterfront residential living
being proposed are not readily available at this time.
6. The development proposed for this site will in fact upgrade the immediate
vicinity based on the proposed property value at time of completion and the fact
that the proposed units will be occupied by homeowners as opposed to transient
tenants, In addition to the new construction on site, landscaping will be
significantly upgraded on site which will in turn lend to the immediate vicinity
being positively impacted,
7. The proposed design ofthe subject project will draw a high-end type of
homeowner looking for quality waterfront living which in turn will benefit the
City as a whole. The proposed condominium structure and landscaping should be
an incentive to other property owners within the area to improve and/or redevelop
their sites.
.
.
..
8. The requested reductions in required setbacks will allow the site to be
developed with a project consistent with other existing setbacks within the
Clearwater Pass district while at the same time along with the proposed
landscaping helping to differentiate the area from other beach communities.
9, The proposed project is going to provide more than the required amount of
parking on site as opposed to many older uses within the area where on-street
parking is a necessity. This proposed on-site parking will help to lessen traffic
congestion along Bayway Boulevard.
10, The proposed use complies with the Design Guidelines of Beach by
design in that it will be providing pleasing architecture in a tropical vernacular;
creating a sense of a beach community neighborhood; landscaping of all vehicular
use areas so that the view of the parking area is determined by landscaping and
not just pavement and ensuring that the street level of the building is pedestrian
friendly and that all visibility triangles are being maintained,
.
.
LETTER DF AUTHCJRIZA'TION
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with lardlliIIl
__ le'*ll. .. to act as 8n agent for .~ '~:rJAbf ~ ~ Col2.~
(Propert), Owner's Name)
And to execute any and all documents related to securing ptermits
and approvals for the construction on the property general~v located on the
G, &)?- i1AyvA7' \31l)\). C(M/l.~i2. I r~-,L-
L-ors d- , I ).J.: {). 3 \?'I~" A' \3fris:Je S~:D~ lying within
0' (Property Location) I
_};"\ r-'e\ \^ S County, State of --E3.g111 ~.A-
./ ~ (.A~
Signature of Property Owner
t:fQ ~W0>4 f3i. ~f)
Address Property Owner
fOe. &.:leNl~ \IV ct.e.H- C,.Df2.p,
S;~ _ c.. rROc::.'NSr> .
, Print Name .)f Property Owner
_.,,~ L -4l~ -,-,-cdS --L ~
Telephone Number
~LJ~ ~7j,Tr
City/State/Zip Code
~L 2.3/.(... J
,
State of _PI otAOPr.
County of Pl ,.J 1L:(j~
. i::b.
The fclOllo"'g Instrument.... a<lmowledgo 1- me :1f~ ~
off2c..r( ,200~y S"'S~~, ~l~
who is personally known to Me or who has Pf'oduced fL D 1-...
as identlncatlon ilnd who dietsk9 :lilrt oath.
(SignabJre)
Commission .,
Notary Public
tOllCA L BERGERlN
MY COMMISSION. 00 111609
EXPIRES: May 14, 2Ini
Bonded'llllu NalIIy Pltilc ~
or stamped)
(SEAL ABOVE)
Rec.<o>ived: 10/22/ 2 12:06PM; .
16/22/2002 11:18 727595
'-,
l
I
~....t~-' ~ In:'
see,Ia- C. w.. _ /
~a&Law V
se.ptaca Go Waas. '.A.
_ Dn.W I1laa4
CIarwse'. rLJ3'7S4I
111-"1-]232
PIe NUDafMr. deedaeslNft'
wm caa No.:
7275965366 -> NORTHStOE ENGINEERING SERVICES; Page 3
BEACH AND BAY ~TY PAGE 03
...
'_<.l: ilJllS/,.lBl< J 'J!l'~
'J DEL..a5 CWirf. .:'\1II.w. ~! I
1 r
~ 'l7-13--':''OOl :':I:5::€ ~ - 0
:1 :9-:a1Sa i$i!
~~7b7t.
):tl!:1I21:ll)L 3(:c'lf';S ?ffJ:;'~i :pIj:~;:
~fi<<i 1ll1l PrE n.;.~(i
~ SifW- ~.~ '.~..
PAGES ....:!-
"GCT
~EC~
i::~2~!) ___
roll:; .,_
::-IT .__
:e:..C) ___
'_tT"!=' _
,;;,...
~~ .20 iiTlt:
,C/iJ\L ~ )IQ( llHT.1&tDBe.
. ~KaAL - :nI Jiw-:~~
:::t-fO ~ - .;I, T UUU~r I...L"-"'''-
r~AIIIM t>>a &.ilIO .......... PIal. 01-2d2&81.A.. "-13-200 1 4 3~
- p 1/'4El..L.AS CD e~ 114'7' PeS a.a8' t
I..........
~ll.~"
m-~:)
i..,1:
Warranty Deed
'!\. .
T1da WIU'l'UCf DttIIl ...... Uds ,,, cfa.y at hlr. JOlt IIdftI:Il s... ClraIOII". . ............... II 51 1Ier.....
r.aa.r.t ... MIdIa&I WeIe!r. . ..... Ill'" II at .... .... ......, ,.. _t ltftIce addftg is AI 8Qww IIatllWnl.
a...,atw. FL >>m. ......... .. Bun.., WII... Carp., _ flllrId& eof'tPCldtl'oa ..,~ 1IOIC otYb --- .. 69%
~.....rd. Clcuwater. PI. >>",. pIIIIltIl:
~........ 1M.. -.--- ~ ..............n ......... .. *' .......1'1& .... die........ 1"--'''' Illd -... ..r
................._.......at..............-.....,
wrm....... ...... .ttl..... lhr.. fa COIIlIidaI*m or... .. orTDl AND NOIlOO DOUAItS "UI.OO) IIIlI odw:r
.... lad VlIAIMIe _l*a&Iaa CD ...d pIIlUll' IIIIamd ,.ul !I, .aid pIlICee. met ~ w*-( &I .......,. ....Wpd.
_ ...... bIQai:DML .. tokl to Iba tUI....... _ ...teftllldn 1IId.at.. ~. die folllPntl descdIMd ....
'....... ~IIS ..... &8fnI1a.1IeUu COl.. ........lOowis:
Laes 21. D ..11 n 1ItGIkA. 8A.1tSJDE SUBDIVISION NO. S.IAIiI"tIer' wftIa -1 ..II all rtpufu
dill" .-uw... .. III ..,. __ I.. I... .. a.rw.1tr ..,. .......... .. 1M.., ar -
dMnafaa ramItd fa 1'Iat 8ookJI. '....... PabIIe ___IIIPINELUrS c:.w.f3r..I1.rra.
..raIIkMtRtllUo. ~lJ1IIIMrr t1..u..lS45aa4-fOl..a21G; 11-1t-lf8l........eO'DI.
"rMa e. . 0DIftCIlve ..... .... 10 ..met . ......d. vnr III .... ....,..*$1. lit Clae ..... (0 .
... Gild 0lIlt0hr I.... 1'". 'nIre.... ftQlII.......1llIIq ,.fd flit' nnI.... ud tllellUlan ...
* Jafe .roe......., af... ...... CIIrplrldeA.
T~wtlh lIS rIIe~. 1Iesedl....... .....,...l......n~ drawtD 1tdaq1nl arlll ..,...-lIppCnIiniDI.
To 8Pe ud to floId. die... fa Il:e siItlpr. rc.n--.
Aad IIw ___ flflftll, mtlI!IIIInlS wfda ... IfIIIdIe ...... die pIIlIIDr .. IIIWt\IWv I8imI of.w .... III Ale..pIa; dlllcllle
....-.....riIflc.... fawftalaudladty ID leIladeopey 1IIi4", dllII tJJe IP-- bcreb1l1dty __ _ dIIw III'"
11II1111' wIU "'11I dIlt __ ..... tile IawtId. ...... ar. .... .....~ lt$i .... aid fIIIId II kG or ..
~~__~........IDD........Ja.JGH.
I. "'laIess Wltenot...._... '--D.paalur's.... _.. die" 1IIId,... dDt 8Ilowe wrt...
~.-.
'::~~-I
~..~
~
_I
~
Received: 10/22/ 2 12:07PM; .
. 10~i2/2002 11:18 727595
"
.I
~
!
i
J
.
"
--.
iaOdl'~
WIeaaa NIllDC
7275965366 -> NORTHSIDE~GINEERING SERVICES;
BEACH AND BAY ~Y PAGE
Page 4
134
...
I
P CH~S COUNTY ~,
OFF' .RECJ!lk U4?!i PtJ 2.sa
. SL.'1~ ~r;..~'EeA
S-.OoIacr
(SeJd)
loo. ~~~
wd-ll.
(Seal)
......DtrtI......z
My~rLbpka:
-........
~
.. -' ,,--
-
PROJECT NAME
NES PROJECT NO. :
EXISTING CONDITIONS
TOTAL ARE.A=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN =
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
C=
T.O.C. =
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
TOTALAREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTALAREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
CN =
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
c=
T.O.C. =
.
.
ISLANDER
0248
22,242 SF =
14,256 SF =
o SF =
7,986 SF =
0.51 ACRES
0.33 ACRES
0.00 ACRES
0.18 ACRES
22,242 SF
14,256 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN =
o SF OF POND AREA @ CN =
7,986 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN =
(LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION, TYPE A)
80.41
98
100
49
22,242 SF
14,256 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C =
o SF OF POND AREA @ C =
7,986 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.95
1
0.2
0.68
10 MINUTES
22,242 SF =
14,797 SF =
908 SF =
6,537 SF =
0.51 ACRES
0.34 ACRES
0.02 ACRES
0.15 ACRES
22,242 SF
14,797 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN =
908 SF OF POND AREA @ CN =
6,537 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN =
(LAWN IN GOOD CONDITION, TYPE A)
80.74
98
100
39
22,242 SF
14,797 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C =
908 SF OF POND AREA @ C =
6,537 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.95
1
0.2
0.73
10 MINUTES
~A.q~
FL ~~. 4 Y7 \.t31
.r .~" "
.
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
25 YEAR STORM EVENT
PROJECT: ISLANDER
JOB NUMBER: 0248
RUN-OFF COEFFICIENTS
PRE-CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
C=
POST -CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
0.68
c=
0.73
STORAGE CALCULATION
.
22,242 SF
14,256 SF OF IMP. AREA@C=
o SF OF POND AREA @ C =
7,986 SF OF PERV. AREA@C =
22,242 SF
14,797 SF OF IMP. AREA@C=
908 SF OF POND AREA @ C =
6,537 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
PRE-CONSTRUCTION
AREA (ACRES) =
TIME OF CONC. Tc (MIN.)=
I @Tc =10 (IN/HR)(25 YEAR EVENT)=
Q(out) = Q @ Tc (CFS) =
POST -CONSTRUCTION
TIME
(MIN.)
10.00
15.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
I
!IN/HR)
8.50
7.30
6.50
5.40
4.60
4.00
3.60
MAX. STORAGE =
WEIR DESIGN
TOP. OF WEIR ELEV.=
BOT. OF WEIR ELEV.=
H=
Q=
L=Q/3.3*H^1.5 =
WATER QUALITY DEPTH =
0.5 in.
TOTAL POST CONST. AREA" DEPTH' 1ft112in=
927 CF
WATER QUALITY =
Q(in)
(CFS)
3.18
2.73
2.43
2.02
1.72
1.49
1.34
133 CF
5.00 FT
4.72 FT
0.28 FT
2.95 CFS
6.04 FT
0.51
10
8.50
2.95
INFLOW
(CF)
1,905
2,454
2,914
3,631
4,124
4,483
4,841
OUTFLOW
(CF)
1,773
2,659
3,545
5,318
7,091
8,863
10,636
0.95
1
0.2
0.95
1
0.2
STORAGE
(CF)
133
-205
-631
-1,687
-2,966
-4,380
-5,794
~~ ~.~
~ L- Q E_j'.\.-~f"'7Y31
. .. .
.
PROJECT NAME
NES PROJECT NO. :
ISLANDER
0248
STAGE STORAGE DATA:
POND 1 :
BOT. EL =
T:'y. ft..::
TOP EL =
STAGE AREA AREA STORAGE
ft-NGVD SF AC CF
3.00 264 0.0061 0
3.25 345 0.0079 76
3.50 425 0.0098 172
4.00 586 0.0135 425
4.20 650 0.0149 549
4.50 747 0.0171 758
4.72 818 0.0188 930
4.75 828 0.0190 955
5.00 " 908 0.0208 1,172
TOTAL QUALITY CALCULATIONS:
TOTAL AREA =
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH =
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME =
PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION =
AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY =
.
22242
0.5
927
4.72
930
p-<l- A ,~~
~L rE# '17"13.(
CL WCoverSheet
.
.
FLD2002-11043
692 BAYWAY BLVD
Date Received: 11/26/2002
THE ISLANDER
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 285A
r~ I!'''
f (!
fir ' ~
/. ;
c....
c, -/7fti'~
N :E ~ ~ . ~
0 '" 0 <= '" <=
0 -< ~ <= <= .e-
N r- g,.. .n g,.. .n
-- V) '" 1l
1.0 ":l: - 0 <= - 0 <=
= = ...
N "" := l"!, ~ := l"!, ~ e<:
-- ":l: Q Q "
- - .... ....
- - = Eo/'} = Eo/'}
- < <
'i -;
- ...
Q 1 =
Eo- Eo<
= >
.~ s:: ...
~ u s::
- ~ 0 e
.... '"
~ I-<
Q = ~ /I) >> c:
z :::s Q ~ ~ 0
-= == s:: =-- +::
...... .~
!l
u N a.
< 1.0
N a.
~ - ro
"" Q)
= ("l
~ I *"
t 0
- '0
~ 0
Q)
Q E
z 0
= ~ 0
M .. -
'E ::l
= I:: 0
M = ....
Q Q) Q)
t-- U a.*"
,....(
= ro 0
....-
= QlJl
= . ro
= M Q ....c:'o
= <:) z ~.Q Q)
<:) - 0::: -.-
= M = V) w~~
= :=
-- Q r- a.. = 0 -
= \C u N <C a. c: '+-<
= N u ~ 0
-- < .... g- .s
M ,...;
= ,...; oc:- /I)
= .. zro= 1'Jl
M QJ (/)....~ g,..
.....
,....( = -,E::l
~ Q (/)_0
.. Z -0.>-
=It: "; .lol ::I: .- '0
'... = ....Q)c:
..jool u o ro
c.. I-< ~
..... ~ = ~'o
~ ro Q)
(oJ .~ ~
~ = 8 ~
~ .S 0 lJl.-
.- >
- ~ 5 ~~
Cl.
'C ,D
u .~ ...... Q)
~ /I) E-< .0
~ - u
~ ~ ~
b c:
cr.J 0
~ 5 :g
~ ,g
Q u0
U E-<~ a.
= a.
~ cr.J ro
"" ~6 .~
Eo- 0
.. ~ .s::.
~ ....
~
g,.. cr.J....:I
("l
~
-
-
I
N
Q 0
Z 0 ~
N 0 ~
~ ~ 9 .c u
'" ~ 1: ~
~
~ u ~ = ~ u
.... /I)
~ 8
= >>
:::s ~
=--
..
.
.
Fire Review
04/14/2003
Duanne Anderson
BCP2003-03432
692 BAYWAY BLVD
562-4327 x3028
04/14/2003
Show exit lighting at the stairs.
THIS CONDITION HAS BEEN MET VIA REVISED PLAN REC'D JUNE 6, 2003 AND
CONDITION RESPONSE LETTERS REC'D FROM EACH, THE ARCHITECT AND THE
ENGINEER OF RECORD REC'D AUGUST 8, 2003
Fire Alarm and Fire Sprinkler work to be done by certified contractors under separate permits.
Landscape Review Arden Dittmer 562-4604
08/11/2003 Changes in building location... landscape adjustments have been addressed.
MET - 5/01/03 (A_D)
1.) That the table be revised to indicate the proper sizes as required by Code,
2,) Submit revised plan (Page L-1) that indicates changes for review.
MET - 4/17/03 by A_D
1,) That the landscape plan be modified to show planting areas between sea grapes and lantana
on the south side of building changed from sod to dwarf oleander for the purpose of simplified and
reduced maintenance.
2.) Submit revised plan (Page L-1) that indicates changes for review.
old comments by MTP;
The following condition of the development order, 11, That the landscape plan be modified to
clarify planting areas, improve side yard landscaping/buffering and clarify the preservation or
removal of existing trees., has not been met
I recommend enlisting the aid of a landscape professional to work on the landscape plans.
Land Resource Condition
Rick Albee
562-4741
03/18/2003
Tree survey required, Once trees are shown on the site and landscape plans efforts must be
made to preserve them.
4/25/03-Tree survey recieved, incorporate trees into plan,
Install tree barricades to City standards, 2x2 post with 1 x4 rails at full dripline.
04/29/2003
Mechanical Review Mark Matheny 562-4863
04/11/2003 1. PROVIDE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW.
Stormwater Mgmt Condition
1) Provide Water quality calcs (met)
2) Provide Sub-Drain details (met)
Traffic Engineering Condition Mark Matheny 562-4863
05/01/2003 Applicant must show City standard handicap parking and sign details on the site plan.
05/01/2003
Show sanitation truck and travel path at the same scale as the rest of the site plan.
08/27/2003
SEE ITEMS UNDER ZONING REVIEW/CONDITIONS.
"-df ~~J ~~~p~
(N"L- S J'\J ~~ Lc:l .
Joning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504
08/27/2003 8/27/03 - WW - Same comment as 3/18/03.
3/18/03 - MTP - NOT MET - PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THESE FEES HAVE BEEN PAID
That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
Print Date: 09/04/2003
4 of 7
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
r,
Met
Met
Met
Not Met
Not Met
CaseConditons
~ning Review
J 04/30/2003
J 07/25/2003
J
07/25/2003
j 04/3012003
J 04/30/2003
J 04/30/2003
J 04/30/2003
J 04/30/2003
J 08/27/2003
J 04/30/2000
J 08/27/2003
..
e
.
BCP2003-03432
692 BAYWAY BLVD
Wayne Wells 562-4504
4/30/03- WW - building plans provide colors.
3/18/03 - MTP - NOT MET - SUBMIT RENDERED ELEVATIONS
That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
7/25/03 - Submitted recorded Unity of Title, - WW
6/23/03 - That a Unity of Title be recorded tying all lots together as one lot prior to the issuance of
building permits; Unity of Title form available from Planning Dept.;
7/25/03 - Submitted condo docs with restrictive language. - WW
4/30/03 - That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests
of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums;
NOT MET - PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT THIS WILL BE THE CASE
4/30/03 - WW - Met
3/18/03 - MTP - NOT MET - ADD NOTE TO SITE PLANS
That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording warning
boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
4/30/03 - WW - Met
3/18/03 - MTP - NOT MET - ADD NOTE TO SITE PLANS
That covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an administrative
level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
3/18/03 - MTP - FIRE ISSUE - N/A
That the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 303 standards for "marinas and boat yards"
be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits;
3/18/03 - MTP - BUILDING ISSUE - N/A
That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
3/18/03 - MTP - N/A - ENGINEERING ISSUE
That all storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits;
8/27/03 - WW - Plans revised.
8/14/03 - WW
Dumpster on Sheet A 1.1 is different than that shown on Sheets S 1.1 and S 1,2, Revise to make
consistent.
4/30/03 - WW
Dumpster on Sheet A1,1 (building plans) does not match Sheet C3.1 (site plans). Coordinate
plans for size and design. Make sure truck can pick up - see Don Melone or Tom Glenn.
3/18/03 - MTP - N/A - ENGINEERING ISSUE
That the dumpster enclosure meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Department prior to the
issuance of building permits; and
4/30/03 - WW - Landscape review required (Arden Dittmer).
3/18/03 - MTP - N/A LANDSCAPE ISSUE
That the landscape plan be modified to clarify planting areas, improve side yard
landscaping/buffering and clarify the preservation or removal of existing trees,
8/27/03 - WW - Plans revised to show a/c units above elevator area.
8/14/03 - WW
Same comment as 4/30/03. Owner's representative indicated that air condensing units were to be
placed on rear side of roof, yet architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical plans (at least)
do not reflect this location indicated.
4/30/03 - WW
Must show location of air condensing units on all applicable building plans and site plans.
Print Date: 09/04/2003
5 of 7
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
CaseConditons
Joning Review
08/27/2003
J 08/27/2003
j 08/27/2003
j 08/27/2003
, j 08/27/2003
J 08/27/2003
J 09/02/2003
Ii 08/2712003
+
J 08/27/2003
:f
J 08/27/2003
~
i 08/27/2003
J 08/2712003
.
.
.
BCP2003-03432
692 BAYWAY BLVD
Wayne Wells 562-4504
8/27/03 - WW - Plans revised, Met
8/14/03 - WW - same comment as 4/30/03.
4/30/03 - WW
Sheet E-2 - Unclear where light fixtures will be mounted within dumpster enclosure. Advise,
remove or relocate.
8/27/03 - WW - Plans show elevator equipment above dumpster. Met
8/14/03 - WW
Owner's representative indicated that elevator equipment would be located above dumpster
enclosure to meet FEMA base flood elevation requirements. Plans do not indicate such revision.
Revise all appropriate sheets.
8/27/03 & 8/14/03 - WW Not Met
Sheet A 1.1 - Pool equipment location removed from plans, Shown on some plan sheets and not
on others. Provide details of pool equipment building/structure.
8/27/03 - WW - Same comment as 8/14/03, Not Met
8/14/03 - WW - Sheet C3.1 -Indicate method of pool safety (fence, etc.). For fences, ensure
Community Development Code provisions are being met, including waterfront visibility triangles.
8/27/03 - WW - Same comment as 8/14/03, Not Met
8/14/03 - WW - Sheet C4.1 - Chain link fence not allowed on top of retaining wall. Suggest
revising to railing (no chain link).
8/27/03 - WW - Show location of dumpster staging area (dumpster must be a rolling dumpster). Not Met
9/2/03 - WW - Approved minor revisions to CDB approved plan. Met
8/27/03 - WW - Sheet C3.1 and A 1.1 - Unclear why two parking spaces on the east side of
building (not under building) were removed. Clarify/advise,
8/27/03 - WW Not Met
Sheet A1,1 (and all other appropriate sheets) - columns have been added at the edge of the
sidewalk parallel with Bayway Blvd that were not previously there. The columns located on either
side of the driveway violate the visibility triangles. Remove from visibility triangles. See Bennett
Elbo in Traffic Engineering Department (562-4775), O~ -.p if B. ES.
8/27/03 - WW Not Met
Sheet A 1.1 and S sheets - walls have been added between columns that require motorists to
blindly enter the parking area and back out of parking spaces, including spaces 9 and 10, which is
uns~fe. ~evise back to only columns with op~n area between. See Bennett Elbo in Traffic "
Engineering Department(562-4775), ~"U~". p I~ 'NWJ} .f ~ \"w\. ~ r I'"Or~ "to I\. -- ~
8/27/03 - WW ~ r, ~ t"s.. .., V'" f A..J) B.vt-L' $' Not Met
Sheet A 1.1 and all other appropriate sheets - walls added on the west side of the garage level
between the columns has reduced the drive aisle width from the required 24-foot width to 21 feet.
Revise back to 24 feet width of drive aisle. See Bennett Elbo in Traffic Engineering Department
(562-4775). IUUf V<\ ~.) fl~ ~~t~ bul,-- ~ z...,' h) .d.t ~~;~
8/27/03 - WW Not ~
Height of building (to midpoint of pitched roof) has been increased from 40'-4" (as shown on the
approval by the CDB on 1/21/03 of Flexible Development case number FLD2002-11043) to
43'-10.5". Section 4-406 of the Community Development Code defines this change as a major
change to that previously approved by the CDB and requires the CDB to review and approve the
change, Must re-apply to go back to CDB, or revise roof pitch to reduce back down to 40'-4" from
base flood elevation.
8/27/03 - WW Not Met
Sheet E-2 - pedestrian door into rear of dumpster enclosure shown on opposite side of enclosure
than that on Sheet A 1.1, S sheets and other sheets, Revise,
CaseConditons
Print Date: 09/04/2003
6 of 7
..
, ~
.
.
BCP2003-03432
692 BAYWAY BLVD
Zoning Review Wayne Wells 562-4504
08/27/2003 8/27/03 - WW Not Met
Sheet C3,1 and all other appropriate civil sheets - columns added at edge of sidewalk parallel to
Bayway Blvd not shown on civil sheets. Show columns (see also condition regarding the columns
within the visibility triangles) on plans, Also remove note regarding the cantilevered walkway, as it
is no longer applicable,
h
Print Date: 09/04/2003
CaseConditons
7 of 7
..
.
.
"",111,
,"~~~lOF rift;:.
,\{~.,.,'..""',....~~.
....~,' I ~,--
~~(...\ll'7\Sf'(n~~ ~ ';.
~C":t~~~:2~~oe::c~
'" r:: . ""'.-.,.,..',.,.'.'.. ,.....~
"~';._"'~"' - ~Iit
....: ,>;."".'.- r\:""
"':?.L\",.-,~.' .'~~"
-:"'~r.$;t;;';;i"~~'"''
.......... JI1 TE?t, ".'
'1,1,.,1
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRnE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
loNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 2, 2003
Ms. Debra Harris
Northside Engineering Services, Inc,
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
Re: FLD2002-11043, 692 Bayway Boulevard
Dear Ms. Harris:
On January 21,2003, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 11 conditions the above
referenced case, which was a Flexible Development application for attached dwellings with reductions of
the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to
nine feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9,5 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to
8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and reductions of the rear (north) setback
from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C.
Due to Building Code requirements for the stairwell on the west side, your proposal is to shift the entire
building to the east so that the western stairwell now meets the Community Development Code (Code)
and Building Code required setback of 10 feet to the western property line. This necessitates, in order to
maintain setbacks approved by the CDB, the removal of the eastern two parking spaces, while
maintaining a minimum of a 10 feet side (east) setback to the building/stairwell. This reduces the
provided parking to 27 parking spaces, where 23 spaces are required by Code, Additionally, to meet
handicap accessibility requirements, a sidewalk connector has been added from the sidewalk adjacent to
the parking garage/lot to the sidewalk within the public right-of-way.
In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be Minor
Revisions and are approved. These Minor Revisions must be shown on the site plans submitted for
Building Permit BCP2003-03432 prior to the issuance of the building permit.
an que ions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner, at 562-4504.
I IMS5c1PDSlP/anning Depal'/men/IC D BIFLEXllnac/ive or Finished Applica/ionslBayway 692 17le Is/andel'S - ApprovedlBayway 692 Minor
Revisions Le/ler 9.2.03.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
En HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYr HAMII.TON, COMMISSIONER (i) BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
Nonhside
&~ SewiaJ 1He.
.
CIVIL ·
LAND PLANN ING ·
ENVI RONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
August 5, 2003
City of Clearwater
Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Fl 33758-4748
rm rE:' r'" c.;.T f' \,111 r~ 1'.--.''';
n Ie:. !;; : i> !! "l~ n i
i -.a..............__...,.... -.. , ~; !
! '~.~, I j. ,', \
IU': :,1 AUG 0 5 2003 n: ;\
L:l 1'- J
_.....",..~_..........._..:,...........;~J
F-Ju.Nl'-'G & r,r.".:' 'C'P;d-tll (10 c~
'c' IT" v 0:=' C\l" ;" '. /.." :';" ~:F} '"
I r .t:HtiWMU:_-'
Attn: Wayne Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
Re: FLD2002-11043 & BCP2003-03432 (692 Bayway Blvd)
NES Proj ect #0248
Dear Wayne,
Weare submitting the following statements regarding minor changes to the approved site
plan for the above named project.
The proposed site plan was approved by CDB on January 21,2003 with a side setback
reduction from 10' to 8.1' from the western property line to the stairwel1. During the
permitting process, it has come to our attention that because the stairwell is open and of
frame construction, Section 1006,2.2 of the Florida Building Code requires a 10' setback
from the property line, In lieu of providing the required two hour fire rated walls around
the stairwell, and maintaining the 8,1' side setback, the developer has opted to shift the
entire building over 1.9' to meet the required 10' setback. With this shift in building
location, the following is accomplished:
1. The two exterior parking spaces on the eastern side of the site are being
removed, This provides less impervious area for the site (previously ,69; now
.66), provides less paved vehicular area (previously 10,362 sq ft; now 9,765
sq. ft), provides additional open space (previously 30,8%; now 34%) and the
project will still have four parking spaces above what is required (23 parking
spaces required and 27 now provided);
2. A 3' wide walkway has been added leading from the 5' walkway at the front
of the building (alongside the elevator), to the sidewalk in the right-of-way, to
allow for handicap access from the building to the street. Bennett Elbo of
Traffic Engineering requested this change.
We have already shown the revised landscape plan to Arden Dittmer who was satisfied
with the modifications, Eight revised sets of plans are concurrently being submitted to
the Permitting Department.
Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding this
project.
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
N ESADMI N@MI N DS PRI NG.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 ' 8036
<4
/-
.
.
Very Truly Yours,
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
,.,
Cc: Bob Lyons, Sun West Construction
Chuck Butler, Butler's Nursery, Inc,
Nonhside
&~W<<f Sew.iaJ 11U.
.
CIVIL.
LAND PLANNING.
ENVI RONMENTAL.
TRANSPORTATION ·
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: August 5, 2003
To: City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Attn: Wayne Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
Reference: The Island Key - BCP2003-03432 & FLD2002-11043
NES Comm.: 0248 - 692 Bayway Blvd
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
( ) Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
(X)Originals
o Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
o Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
o Per Your Request 0 For Your Review & Comment
o For Your Use ( ) For Your Approval
(X) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies Date Description
1 Revised Civil & Landscape Plans (7 sheets)
Comments: Please do not hesitate to contact this office should YOU have any
further questions or comments reqardinq this proiect.
C~iesTo:
\ '"
\ 1
By: \~':-
Debra Harris, proJ
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MI N DS PRI NG.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 ' 8036
r .-.
I
, . '
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
January 28, 2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2002-11 043 - 692 Bayway Boulevard
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application for attached dwellings with reductions of the front (south)
setback from 15 feet to five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to nine
feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool equipment room), from 10
feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and reductions ofthe rear
(north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway), as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The Community Development
Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That a Unity of Title be recorded tying all lots together as one lot prior to the issuance of
building permits;
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BlI.L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAl. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
t" <I
. t
.
.
.
January 28, 2003
Ghovaee - Page Two
3. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums;
4. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording
warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
5. That covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an
administrative level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
6. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building
permits;
7. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
8. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 ofthe Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
9. That all storm water, water and sewer design standards ofthe Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits;
10. That the dumpster enclosure meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Department prior to
the issuance of building permits; and
11. That the landscape plan be modified to clarify planting areas, improve side yard
landscaping/buffering and clarify the preservation or removal of existing trees.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (January 21, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall
be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of
time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of the CDB decision, The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect
of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case
expires on February 4,2003.
..
, ...
.
.
January 28,2003
Ghovaee - Page Three
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M, Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.c1earwater-fl..com.
Very truly yours,
~~
Cynthia Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
\ IMS5c\PDS\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX1Inactive or Finished ApplicationslBayway 692 The Islanders - ApprovedlBayway 692
Development Order. doc
.
.
Jf~~
~~~~lOFr/(~
~V~.j~X~
~~~' I ((p.,..,
lt~~,\ 1/ ,'~ ~ ~
~~ ~ -" oo::(~
~\ -==- ~~
~~~ ~l
~JJ?4TE~~~~~
~~..cdt'jj
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
January 13, 2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Community Development Board Meeting regarding application for Flexible Development
approval (FLD2002-11043) for attached dwellings with reductions of the front (south)
setback from 15 feet to five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to
nine feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool equipment
room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway)
and an increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet (as measured from base flood
elevation), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C.
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
The Flexible Development approval for attached dwellings with reductions of the front (south)
setback from 15 feet to five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to nine feet
(to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions
of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet
(to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from
20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway) and an increase in building height from 35 feet to 42
feet (as measured from base flood elevation), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C for property located at 692 Bayway Boulevard has been
scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on January 21,2003.
The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at
112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
tJ ~N- If. tJ~
Wayt/e M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
\IMS5c1PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D B\FLEX\Penf.jfitJ.NlJslJ\~!'f~IfIlfI{-{J%tMw~~y 692 The IslanderslBayway 692 CDB Letter.doc
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
-
e
(a) Balconies. Any balcony, as to which direct and exclnsive access shall be ammlcd to
any particular Unit to the exclusion of all others, shall be a Limited Common Element
of such Unit.
(b) Covered Parking Spaces. Each Unit shall be assigned at least one (I) Covered Parking
Space by the Developer located under the Building. The wall, if any, separating thc
Covered Parking Space of one Owner from the Covered Parking Space of an adjoining
Owner shall be referred to as a "divider wall". The location of the vertical plane of the
centerline of the divider walls shown on Exhibit "2" and constructed by the Developer
shall be the common boundary between the adjoining Covered Parking Spaces. ^
divider wall shall not be removed or constructed by an Owner.
(i) That part of the divider wall located within the boundary of the covered
parking areas shall be part oflhe Covered Parking Area. Adjoining Covered
Parking Spaces which share a divider wall shall have a cross~easement of
support in the portion of the divider wall not located within the boundary of
the covered parking area. Maintenance of the covered parking area and tlte
divider wall shall be accomplished by the Association.
(ii) Each Owner shall be responsible for any damagc caused to a divider wall by
its negligent or intentional acts or the negligent or intentional acts of its
employees or agents, and the cost of said repair shall be specifically assessed
to that Owner, and said Slllll, together with interest thereon and all costs of
collection, shall be immediately due and payable and shall be secured inlhe
same manner as the Association's I ien for payment of Common Expenses, as
hereinafter described.
(iii) Covered Parking Spaces shall initially be assigned by the Developer. Unit
Owners may assign their Covered Parking Spaces to another Unit Owner bul
may not assign nor allow use of a Covered Parking Space to or by any
person or entity who is not a Unit Owner. Any Covered Parking Spaces
under the Building not assigned by the Developer may be used by the (Jnit
Owners only on a first come-first serve basis. No Unit Owner shall park
more thiln two vehicles in any parking areas.
(c) Storage Spaces. Any Storage Space, as to which direct and exclusive access shall be
afforded to any particular Unit to the exclusion of all others, shall be a Limited
Common Element of each Unit. Storage Spaces shall be initially assigned by the
Developer.
(d) Docks. Fishing Pier and Boat Slips: The docks area and the fishing pier arc common
elements, as shown in the plot plans incorporated herein as sllOwn on Exhibit "2".
Boat slips and individual boat docks are limited common elements and shall be lor [he
exclusive use and benefit of the Unit Owners who have been assigned an individual
boat dock and boat slip by separate unrecorded assignment or right of use of boat slip.
Access to and LIse of said docks and slips shall be in accordance with Rnles and
Regulations of the Condominium promulgated by the 130ard of Directors of tlte
Association. Expenses for maintenance, utilities, replacement and repair, and
responsibilities for all ofthe docks and boat slips, shall be borne equally by each Unit
Owner who has been assigned a dock and boat slip. Unit Owners who have been
assigned the exclusive right of use of a dock 01' boat slip shall pay a maintenance and
reserve fee to the Association in an amount determined from time to time by (he Board
of the Association. Such feel shall include a pro rata pOltion of the Sovereign
Submerged Land Lease fees and charges. Exclusive lIse of an individual dock and boat
slip may be transferred separate from transfer of ownership ofa condominiulllunit, but
only to a Unit O~er.
3.4 Easements. The following casements are hereby created (in addition to any easements
created under the Act):
(a) Support. Each Unit shall have an easement of support and of necessity and shall be
subject to an easement of support and necessity in favor of all other Units, and [he
Common Elements.
4
,-
e .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
December 9,2002
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
601 Cleveland Street
Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval for attached dwellings with reductions of
the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator)
and from 15 feet to nine feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10
feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five
feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to
5.4 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to
pool deck and walkway) and an increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C.
(Case No. FLD2002-l1 043, 692 Bayway Boulevard).
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval for attached
dwellings with reductions of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to dumpster
enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet
to five feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to
5.4 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool
deck and walkway) and an increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. at 692
Bayway Boulevard. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined
that the application is complete, but with the following submission necessary:
1. Submit the original "Affidavit to Authorize Agent" signed by Susan Crosser.
2, Will need to record a Unity of Title document in the public records prior to the issuance
of any permits tying all lots together as one lot for development purposes.
3. Application written material will need to include the height increase proposed, including
addressing the General Applicability criteria and the Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Proj ect criteria.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYr HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
.
,
December 9, 2002
Ghovaee - Page 2
4. Columns at east and west ends of building appear to encroach into end parking spaces,
making the spaces nonfunctional. Remove the spaces or revise drawing to make the
spaces functional, which will change the proposed setbacks, site data and site
improvements, or if columns don't conflict, dimension the width of the end parking
spaces.
5. The site plan and/or front (south) building elevations are unclear whether columns on
first, second and third floors (elevated) are on a cantilevered walkway or whether the
columns extend to the ground floor. If the columns extend to ground level, indicate such
on the site plan and such columns may affect placement of the dumpster enclosure.
Any responses to the above comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional
comments will be provided at the DRC meeting. The above comments and comments you will
receive at the DRC meeting must be addressed and submitted to the Planning Department by
4:30 p.m. on December 20, 2002 (15 copies of all submittals).
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency at 1:15
p.m. on December 20, 2002, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the
second floor of the Municipal Service Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater.
You or a representative must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have
regarding your application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access
zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
W~~M.,W~
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
...
LL
.
o
>-
I-
o
FAX COVER MEMO
TO:
Phone:_+ 4-' ~ ~ ~ ~ lo 9
FROM: \Jr~N..- Wg\\\
DATE:~ ~)-.l) 0 L-
Phone: S \D ~ ,~ +- :)04-
RE: 'fLp "l.JQoZ - (lO 43
_. 01L BjwcJ ~\~d-
C'~\t\-e., \1~ '
-\- CD4e.\-t \l\\-u-t:ar 'fLO~01- -. \ IO+L
I ~, \1,r'1\n wc:\-cr ~ r
MESSAGE:
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) :\,
DATE,TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
12/09 15:50
94458035
00:02:42
05
OK
STANDARD
ECM
TIME 12/09/2002 15:53
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: January 21. 2003
Case Number: FLD2002-11043
Agenda Item: D7
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Burnaby Welch Corporation.
APPLICANT/AGENT:
Mr. Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
LOCATION:
692 Bayway Boulevard.
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval for attached dwellings with
reductions of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to
dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to
stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5
feet (to pavement), reductions ofthe side (west) setback from 10 feet
to five feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to
stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and reductions
of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and
walkway), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under
the provisions of Section 2-803.C.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.51 acres; 22,242 square feet.
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
187 feet of width along Bayway Boulevard by 120 feet of depth.
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Overnight accommodations.
Attached townhome dwellings.
PLAN CATEGORY:
RFH, Resort Facilities High Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
T, Tourist District
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11 043
Page 1
.
.
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Intracoastal waterway
West: Vacant (proposed attached townhome dwellings)
East: Governmental use (police substation)
South: Overnight accommodations
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Multi-family dwellings, overnight accommodation and commercial
uses dominate the immediate vicinity.
ANALYSIS:
The site is 0,51 acres located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 600 feet west
of Gulf Boulevard. It is located along a highly developed area within Clearwater Beach and has
frontage along Clearwater Bay. The site is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District
of Beach By Design, which is a distinctive area of mixed uses including high rise condominiums,
resort hotels and commercial uses. Beach By Design contemplates this District will be an area of
strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of
Clearwater Beach.
The site is currently developed with a 24-room overnight accommodation use. The site contains
an II-slip dock, with the slips currently leased to non-resident boat owners. The developer
proposes to discontinue the leases prior to construction of the attached dwellings (condos). Use of
the dock will be for residents and their guests only and not sub-leased.
The proposal includes constructing a IS-unit, four-story attached dwelling,with three floors of
living area above one floor of ground-level parking. Each unit will be approximately 1,750 square
feet in area. The parking under the building will include 29 spaces, 1.93 spaces per unit.
Development of this site will confine access to a single, 24 feet wide driveway with on-site
vehicular maneuvering area.
The request is to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions ofthe front
(south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to
nine feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool equipment room), from 10
feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and reductions of the rear
(north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway), under the provisions of
Section 2-803 as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The reduction in side (east and
west) setbacks and the front setback is a function of the unit size, width of the proposed pool and
the slight irregular shape of the property in order to provide additional landscaping and a more
economically, viable project. The reduction of the rear setback is due to the desire to have a
sidewalk accessing the boat slips and an adequate pool deck area. The Building Code requires an
18-foot separation between structures and the seawall (the pool is at a lO-foot separation).
Adjustments to this separation may be reviewed by the Building Official.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include taupe (for most of the building) and
rust (stairwells and elevator) stucco, variegated red barrel tile roof and a significant number of
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11043
Page 2
e
.
windows on all elevations. Units will have balconies on the rear (north) side of the building. The
trim and detail color will be white and off white. Railings on the front and rear will be white. The
building will also be articulated with the unit entries recessed slightly from the front fayade (south
side). Stairwells are located on both the southeast and southwest comers of the building, with an
elevator located approximately on the center of the building fayade.
The landscape plan meets the requirements of Code utilizing a variety of colorful groundcovers
(including lantana, varigated arboricola, dwarfbouganvilla and dwarf confederate jasmine), shrubs
(including dwarf oleander and seagrape) and trees (including reclinata, sabal, coconut and
washingtonia palms and crape myrtle). While the landscape plan meets Code, modifications are
necessary prior to the issuance of building permits to better clarify planting areas and improve side
yard landscapinglbuffering. The landscape plan should also locate and clarify the preservation or
removal of existing trees.
No signs are proposed with this development. A dumpster is provided for solid waste located next
to the elevator on the south side of the building and is accessed by the trash truck from Bayway
Boulevard by its own driveway. Gates for this dumpster enclosure must be 12 feet in open width
to provide for truck access, All required Parks and Recreation fees will be required to be paid
prior to the issuance of any building permits. Additionally, storm water, water and sewer design
standards will be required to be met prior to building permit issuance.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-801.1):
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 30 dwelling units per 24 rooms 15 dwelling Yes
acre (15 units)/40 units
overnight
accommodation
units per acre (20
units)
IMPERVIOUS 0.95 0.64 0.69 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO (ISR)
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11043
Page 3
e
.
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803):
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 22,242 square 22,242 square Yes
(minimum) feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 187 feet 187 feet Yes
(minimum)
FRONT N/A South: zero feet South: five feet Yes
SETBACK to pavement; 9.4 to dumpster/
feet to building elevator; nine
feet to stairwell
REAR N/A North: 8.3 feet North: zero feet Yes
SETBACK to building; zero to walkway and
feet to walkway pool deck
SIDE N/A East: 3,5 feet to East: 9,5 feet to Yes
SETBACK shed pavement
West: 7.3 feet to West: five feet to
building; two pool equipment
feet to pavement room; 8.1 feet to
stairwell; 5.4 feet
to pavement
HEIGHT N/A 20 feet 42 feet to mean Yes
maximum roof
PARKING Determined by 10 spaces 29 spaces (1.93 Yes
SPACES the Community spaces per
minimum Development dwelling unit
Director based under the
on the specific building)
use and/or ITE
Manual standards
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803.C):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development
standards.
The subject property is currently developed with an overnight accommodation
establishment that is in a deteriorating condition. The proposal includes the development
of the site with a IS-unit attached (condo) development. The applicant desires to develop
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11 043
Page 4
e
e
in an area of strategic revitalization and renovation, identified in "Beach by Design, " with
direct access to Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf.
The applicant proposes 15 mid-level attached dwellings (condominiums) compatible with
Beach by Design. The allowable density for this site would permit 15 dwelling units. The
applicant desires a building residential in character. The requested setback reductions
make the site more marketable and usable due to site and design constraints resulting in a
building consistent with Beach by Design. Front setback reductions are due to the size of
pool required and necessary setbacks from the building and seawall for the pool. Many
properties along Bayway Boulevard currently have zero setbacks to property lines and
"back out" parking onto Bayway Boulevard. Many of the existing parking spaces for these
properties exist within the right-of-way. The applicant proposes to provide on-site parking,
reducing the number of and width of driveways to one and 24 feet respectively.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties,
The proposed retail use will help stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area by
providing a refurbished site and a new building. The current assessed valuation of the site
is $1,351,100. With the redevelopment proposal, the assessed valuation is projected at
$7,500,000. This increase in property value is expected to have a beneficial effect on
surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The City of Clearwater permits attached dwellings and specifically within the Tourist
District. The site is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach By
Design which is an area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving
conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach.
4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Overnight accommodation establishment uses and nonresidential uses currently dominate
the surrounding area. Attached dwellings (townhomes) are proposed to the north (three
other projects). The proposal will enhance the site with a new building and landscaping
which exceeds the intent of Code. The site is located within the South Beach/Clearwater
Pass District of Beach By Design which is an area of strategic revitalization and renovation
in response to improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach. The proposal
will aid in the revitalization of the Bayway Boulevard area and Clearwater Beach as a
whole. This location provides an opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater that is
currently undergoing renewed investment and redevelopment.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11 043
Page 5
e
e
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
The location of the site, in relation to Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf of Mexico, makes it
uniquely and ideally suited for the proposed attached dwelling development. The applicant
desires to locate a multi-family development along waterfront property within an emerging,
residential neighborhood. Properties with these characteristics are limited within the City.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The Mediterranean architecture and landscape design will set a new
standard for the area. It may influence similar redevelopment efforts in the area.
7, The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will play a role in the continuing positive changes of
Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a revitalized site and building. The site
is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach By Design which is an
area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the
balance of Clearwater Beach. The proposed development will play an important role in the
continuing revitalization of the beach. The City will benefit by having an attractive
building located in a redeveloping area. The proposed building and landscape
enhancements will significantly improve the site. The proposal incorporates well-
articulated, unified elevations and coordinated architectural elements.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the
construction of an attractive residential development. The proposed project reflects the
City's vision of a revitalized Clearwater Beach and is consistent with Beach by Design.
Due to site and design constraints, the requested setback reductions are necessary to
comply with various other Code provisions and make the site otherwise unusable.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11043
Page 6
.
e
Adequate parking is being provided on-site. The proposal, as part of a Flexible
Development for attached dwellings, would require 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit or 22
spaces. The proposal includes 1.93 spaces per dwelling unit or 29 spaces, all under the
building.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3 (Beach by Design).
The proposal limits access to one, 24 feet wide driveway and on-site vehicle maneuvering
for the on-site, under-building parking. The proposed Mediterranean architecture will be
aesthetically pleasing, blending with other similar projects to the north in the Small Motel
District. The proposed landscaping will lend in differentiating Clearwater Beach from
other beach areas. The residential design of the proposed project will help to create a sense
of a "beach community neighborhood" along Bayway Boulevard.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The surrounding area can be characterized with modest one and two-story multi-family
dwellings, overnight accommodations and non-residential uses. This proposal includes
three floors of attached dwellings over ground floor parking with amenities including a
dock and swimming pool. It will provide a positive redevelopment example for the area.
The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the
Tourist District. The site is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of
Beach By Design. The proposal is consistent and in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage and density, and is compatible with the existing and emerging character, of the
adjacent properties and with Beach by Design.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is zoned Tourist District and is in an area characterized by multi-family dwellings,
overnight accommodation establishments and commercial uses. The character and
intensity of the proposed development will be in compliance with that zoning
classification, The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio
standards within the Tourist District. The proposal is consistent with Beach by Design and
will help generate a more appropriate mix of residential uses and encourage the like-
redevelopment of other sites. The proposed redevelopment will substantially improve the
value of the subject property, which will have a positive impact on surrounding properties.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11 043
Page 7
.
.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the
neighborhood, is permitted in the Tourist District and is encouraged Beach by Design. The
proposal includes 15 attached dwelling units on three floors over ground floor parking with
landscaping and the number of parking spaces in excess of Code requirements in addition
to other on-site amenities.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will improve the existing ingress/egress point of access from
Bayway Boulevard, which basically was developed as one large driveway/parking area.
The proposal includes developing the site with 15 attached dwellings. Vehicle trip
generation will decrease with the proposal from 219 trips/weekday to 88 trips/weekday,
and with the reduction of driveway width(s) to one, 24 feet wide driveway, will not reduce
the level of service (LOS) on Bayway Boulevard. Vehicles will be able to back out and
maneuver on-site to "head out" onto Bayway Boulevard.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with the intent for the South Beach/Clearwater
Pass District under Beach by Design, which is an area of strategic revitalization and
renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach.
Construction of these attached dwellings will change and raise the standards of the
community character of this area of the immediate vicinity, through attractive architecture
and well-designed landscaping.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes constructing a 15-unit, three-story over ground-floor parking
building with attractive architecture and well-designed landscaping. Former parking
spaces located within, and backing into, the right-of-way of Bayway Boulevard will be
eliminated. A dumpster enclosure is proposed, accessed from Bayway Boulevard, in front
of the building adjacent to the elevator.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on December 12, 2002. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development approval for attached dwellings with reductions of the front (south) setback from 15
feet to five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to stairwell), a
reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9,5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11043
Page 8
.
.
(west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to
stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and reductions of the rear (north) setback
from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803,C for the site at 692 Bayway Boulevard, with the
following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That a Unity of Title be recorded tying all lots together as one lot prior to the issuance of
building permits;
3. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums;
4. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording
warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
5. That covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an
administrative level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
6. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building
permits;
7. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
8. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
9. That all storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits;
10. That the dumpster enclosure meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Department prior to the
issuance of building permits; and
11. That the landscape plan be modified to clarify planting areas, improve side yard
landscaping/buffering and clarify the preservation or removal of existing trees.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
Staff Report- Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11043
Page 9
.
.
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
\\MS5c\PDS\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Reviewed and Pending\Bayway 692 The Islanders\Bayway 692 Staff Report.doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11043
Page 10
g ~
N (")
00 ......
:::; ~
00
~
= ~
;: ~ C
111~>
.... ~ ...J
~ N CO
cg>
.> N ~
.... ~ >-
...... ~ <C
< ~ CO
~lI:~
111 ~ CD
~ <if}
U~
~~l
-0
u
I-
.
:::'=:u
......
o
S
]
,
s "'"
5 0
'C 8
~ <l:l
'a .5
p" ~
1 '~ ~ ~ t
"2 ~ .fij ciJ E -~ _.
!'::: cu - !'::: OJ) ~ .~
'E; ~ ~ ':8 !'::: = '0
[j p" :::::'~] 8 'm
~ 13 ",. R .... .~ -e
;e "2 g .",8
CU !'::: ttio'" F=~~
.c <<l OJ)...."5 f$
s ~..8.g S ~ ,_ g.
CU .... OJ) ~n p" CU .... 0 '0
~ ~!'::: ~ _ .= 0 ~ ~
o .- .::0 6 ;:l !'::: ='" ~
g <l:l ,:j:j~ ~ '.j:l ar ..!!l 1.0 . s..
p" 0 <<l <<l ~ - 0
.': ,~ P" Ii cu ~'s ~ OJ)
1:: OJ) p" S p" "'5h ~ ~ .... .;;
!'::: 0 o!,::: p" OJ) ~
o :eB?oQ,<<l ~S'S~
tti ;:l 5 :$ '!a .E OJ)..... '.j:l ~ ~
'; ~ 'C g'U .f'..6 .~ g ~ ~
p.. > p.. 5 -' +-l U ..t:i ......
'" 0 5 '0 l5'E; t '" !':::;:l '0
e . 5 tti S e :~ [j "c:: uS V) ;g
?::O~ (;~ cu> p,,~ _UJ
"2'0;C~'O'~::OB=-N;;)~
~
.~
~
~
,'<
o
o
g ~I
---
N
N
o
OC,?
~~
N
......
~I
....:l
~
:::s
Q
....:l
o
::r:
Q
....:l
o
::r:
Q)
o
o
Z
Q)
o
o
Z
,'<
o
o
N
---
......
......
---
N
,'<
o
o
N
---
1.0
N
---
......
,'<
o
o
~
1.0
~
......
~
Q)
'>
Q)
~
OJ)
;::=
~
(,)
!.:::
4-<
<<l
~
E-<
~
Q)
'>
Q)
~
OJ)
.S
....
Q)
Q)
.S
OJ)
;::=
~
o
t-
o
Q
Q
....:l
r....
o
00
o
Q
Q
....:l
r....
,'<
o
~~
---
......
Q)
d
o
Z
,'<
o
o
~
1.0
~
......
.S
'0
Q)
~
(,)
<<l
t::
<<l
'"
1::
Q)
S ;::=
G.sg
Op...
Qp...
VI
~
N
~
Q
....:l
r....
,'<
o
~~
---
......
Q)
d
o
Z
,'<
o
o
N
---
1.0
N
---
......
p"
o
....
p...
OJ)
d
.~
.c
~
o
E-< ....
.... Q)
~ ~
jo
V)
(")
N
~
Q
....:l
r....
(")
8~
~~
---
......
~
~
5
Q
cu
d
o
Z
N
o
o
N
---
0\
N
......
,'<
o
o
~
1.0
~
......
'"
'"
Q)
;::=
Q)
.....
Q)
]-
o
U
4-<
o
....
Q)
t::
Q)
....:l
o
(")
N
~
Q
....:l
r....
e
,'<
o
~~
---
......
Q)
d
o
Z
,'<
o
o
N
---
1.0
N
---
......
.....
;:l
o
'0
..2
.;
:::s
o
ci
'<t
'<t
N
~
Q
.....1
r....
N
o
~ ~I
~~
N
......
~
~I
o
z
o
~
::r:
,'<
o
o
~
1.0
~
......
......
'1:l
(,)
Q)
~
>>
Q)
~
UJ
Q)
Q)
~
00
......
o
~
Q
....:l
r....
(")
8~
~~
---
......
~
~
~
z
o
Q
cu
5
z
,'<
o
o
~
o
(")
N
,'<
o
o
N
---
1.0
~
......
'1:l
Q)
....
<<l
Q)
....
u
c..
o:l
:::s
o
(")
......
~
Q
....:l
r....
~
is
.s
u
-<
~
os
U
,'<
o
o
~~
~~
......
~
......
o
<l.l
[4l
t:l..
o
~
::r:
,'<
o
o
N
---
1.0
~
......
;::=
.9
.....
<<l
"5
{)
"@
U
Q)
OJ)
o:l
.S'1:l
o:l (,)
.... Q)
Cl~
1.0
......
o
~
Q
....:l
r....
"
('<) ::E . . ~
0
0 < i-
N '<T ";;
--- ...... ~
00 "
--- 00 <(
...... c;! ~
'"
00 U
~~
;:: ~ c
rI.l.....>
.... ..... ....I
~ ~ a:I
cg~
.... N ~
.~ ~ >-
... ~ <(
< ~ a:I
QJ=I:I:~
rI.l ~ cg
~ rI}
U~
~~l
-0
'-'
J-
::.:::..;
~
'"
o
~~
~~
......
Q)
!':::
o
Z
'"
o
o
N
---
\J:)
r::!
......
'"
Q)
Q)
u..
~
Q)
'S;
~
ca
OIl
Q)
.....:l
o
\J:)
o
o
o
.....:l
u..
'"
5
",p
;;
8
a:l
CI)
N
o
~<
~ ~I
N
......
<I
~
~
z
o
o
Q)
!':::
o
Z
N
o
o
N
---
on
N
......
'"
o
o
N
---
\J:)
N
---
......
~
Q)
'S;
Q)
~
Q)
u
~
o
'"
Q)
~
'""0
~
.....:l
o
on
o
o
o
.....:l
u..
'"
5
",p
:.e
5
u
a:l
'"
N
o
OC/).
r::!~
~~
N
......
C/).
~
~
CI)
~
~
o
.....:l
o
::r:
Q)
!':::
o
Z
'"
o
o
N
---
\J:)
r::!
......
~
Q)
'S;
Q)
~
...
Q)
...-
o::t
~
o
...-
C/).
o
......
o
o
o
.....:l
u..
[/'J
5
f::
5
z
o
U
"'-l
"'-l
[/'J
N
o
~u
;n ~I
N
......
U
~I
~
z
o
o
Q)
!':::
o
Z
N
o
o
N
---
on
N
......
'"
o
o
r::!
\J:)
N
---
......
~
Q)
'S;
~
Q)
....
~
o
N
o
o
o
.....:l
u..
vi
"~
+-'
:.e
5
()
a:l
CI)
N
g~
r::!~
"f2o
N
......
~
~
o
~
Z
o
o
Q)
!':::
o
Z
N
o
o
N
--
\J:)
--
N
......
'"
o
o
t::!
\J:)
r::!
......
......
~
Q)
'S;
Q)
~
u
Q)
~
<>(l
~
o::t
IJ..
o
('<)
o
o
o
.....:l
u..
'"
5
',p
:.e
5
u
Q)
Q)
'"
('<)
o
od
N~
NE-<
--
......
d
~
E-<
d
~
E-<
~
Z
o
o
Q)
!':::
o
Z
('<)
o
o
N
--
N
--
......
('<)
o
o
N
--
N
--
......
'"
o
o
N
--
\J:)
r::!
......
......
~
Q)
'S;
~
Q)
...-
'"
o::t
~
:'5l
'0
C/).
o
'<T
o
o
o
.....:l
u..
('<)
~~
--
......
~
~
~
Z
o
o
Q)
!':::
o
Z
'"
o
o
r::!
o
......
--
N
'"
o
o
N
--
\J:)
t::!
......
.<;::
'"
>
Q)
...-
c;j
o
'<T
......
<
o
.....:l
u..
('<)
g~
~~
--
......
~
~
~
Z
o
o
""
<,...
o
N
Q)
gp
p..,
Q)
!':::
o
Z
'"
o
o
r::!
\J:)
r::!
......
"'0
Q)
;:...
'0
u
Q)
....
!':::
o
.....
...-
o::t
.~
C.
0.
<
o
......
o
<
o
.....:l
u..
-
M ::;s
8 <
N '<t
00 -
;::::; 00
M
00
.
~
~
.;;:
<.>
..:
~
oj
u
.S:! ~ . ~.~ 0 '"
;:g '[) b."O 5 (I) .; E
0..2),J::: 5]"'.~E ~~~B~8:::l
o 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 00 -- ~ ~ ~
.9::..s ......j:l~ul'"O 00....(1)
.s "a .g ~ ::::: ~ ~ ~..>< (J. .~ ~ Iii "'.u
.... lOll :::l ~ t<=: 0.. <2 (I) ai .- ~ .l:: ':E E ~ 0
g~~]~~ ~g~ig :~~]]~
a~ s~.~ .~~1~; .Sla15(1)las
.g~e.~1OIl5 ;:g~o~8 ~"g~-5o.5
~ 0.. a g .~ 11 i5 ~ ~ go ~ i5 8 ~ ~ ~ Iii
~ >-. E::::: ~ ~ '0 ~ .s a ~ ~:2 &l ta 15 't;; 1iJ
'0 la ~ '~..s 0 ..:g lOll ~ ] ..2 ~ "5 ii ~ ,g ] S-
o '0 go:a ~ u .~ ~]I': ..s ~ 8 ~ ~ J:i ] "0 ~ .g
._ (I) _ 5 0/)] ~.... (I) lOll '+-< lOll.... I': (I) I': 0 (I)
~g~..s....~~ '~la'~.~Bo~g.u,J:::
""" 0::1 (I) ","0"0 0 ~ :>,J::: 0.... ..... '" ~ "". ;::l ....
o:l:::l"OI='.z!a~ ri'1::!u .!a'+<....j:l0lJ"''O
"O~""l':u ~"Ou....:::::2)o..15~I':(I)(I)....
....._~~.s.~.s!ao:lo.~5"O~..2e..s.1':
O]~~~5~~~~.~51':8o:lo.2~
........-~~.6 ~lOIlai1J[) ~ 1':...."053
~ B ~ 8 B 8. >-. 1i ~ ~ @-1 e.s ~ ~ ~ '5 .El.]
'" 1< 0 .. 0 .... S '" .... (I) a. '+-< ..... (I) !a .... a:J 0..
8 ~ .~ ~ 13 a ~ go .. a..s <i ~ 0 ~ ~ .--, ~ ~ (J
'8 u I': .... .- (I) '8 ~ ~"O (I) I': .;:; ..s't;; ~ '" ~ ~
~l':s~]~~~~~5~.e~~]~.E"g~
~~~0~<~~~UB5g"O(I)~u]2g>-.
~~~~s~.s<~~.s~<2~..s~~~85bg
>-.
.0
"0
(I)
I':
0.0
'"
1::
(I)
lOll
<
(I)
.::::
....
o
-5
:::l
<
S
....
.~
"0
~
'l-<
~
~ ~
=
.- -.:t' C
...... 0
rIJ ~ >
.- ~ .J
~ I m
M
.....0 ~ '<t
......0 '+-<
.- 8~ 0
~ <'l
.- (I)
...... ~<C gp
Cj
< ~m 0...
.. N
~ ::;t:cn
rIJ ~ CD
~
U =
u
~~l
-0
'-'
I-
~
'-'
l
M :8
0
0 <e:
N M
00 -
--- 00
- r::
00
~
= ~
... ~ 0
... Q
~.....>
... ..... .J
~ I In
N
~g>-
:.:: N ~
~ 9 >-
~~<!:
< .. In
Qj=t:l:~
~Qi<o
~ r.rJ
u~
.
~
i-
:~
u
~
1A
'"
u
s::: ClJ ..s.1il!;-:--::: ..:.: - ClJ
o ..s : ] ;::: '5 ClJ 16 g ..s
~ ~ E [l~ s~~ ..s ~ [l~ClJ
~ ~'Vl U ClJ :ii ~ E ::9." ~ ClJ ,g'~ ..s
~ .~ ~ .~~ ~:i ~~~ ~ l~j
~ ~ 0 g .~~ ~~.D .S ~[l~ ~
~ '" [l u<i'l "''''~ ;s::9 ~ ~~~ .ClJ....~
5 ,s],sE ~~~ ~~.8 ~ giil]
5 OJ) ~ ,;,~ SSClJ 43--:::~ s 'E'.,; .CO
~ 5 '+=i 00.. Eo..s ClJS:::ow-B ~8~-g8
~ ~o~~ os:::..s ..s~~ 2 ~]~ ~B
~ ~~~i~s t,g'i ~~~ 'i b:.... ~~
'" <i'l ClJ ClJ t<l '" '" t<l ClJ":': .$:l "g :g c ~ B ..;:::.t::
ClJ ." o....!;: OJ).t:: "l:: ClJ ...c:."l:: g .::: ClJ" ~ 2:l^ ? ..." "' 0..
~ [l ~~-.,;...c:.,;'" ",~.'C --~ -
;::l s::: <i'l 1;l .c:: a ~ - :.a ClJ .D !:l;::l OJ Ij,j .~ 0 5 -B ~
u ;,;;.:::..g - ;.::: ClJ" '" -B .S ~ I ClJ Sil s::: _>-..,.." .'" S<
.S .,; ] '" ~ ~;E ~."l:: .;=; ~ ClJ -;: -~ ClJ l:: OJ) E:>l ;=; .....,
~~ OJ)co'Vl'~'" ClJO.D 'o..s .Vl. ~ ~~
_~ s:::t<l;::l._~ClJ -5"'- ~ c ClJ 0 ClJ-
;::l > - 'Vl .- S > o..s ." !:l .;::: ... OJ) :; ~ 0 -l3 ..s
043~;::l6~-~~E~c;::l ~~6 ~ ClJ~a~~~
~ ~~a8S:::~~0.Vls:::~] ClJ_....~ . o..SClJ!ij.,;o
s::: ClJ 0 ~ ~ 'Vl ClJ .... ClJ 0 8 '" u W ~ C. ClJ -
'" OJ)..s...c: .=.,; -'" ClJ -5',p _ S:::!:l ClJ ...c: ~ ~ t<l ." ...c: ~
s::: ._ ~ '" .-!;; ClJ '+=i S ~ .,; i;J.,; .,; _ OJ) ." ~ ~ 0 ~ !ij - '"
.9 [l 0..0 ~ ~ -5 <C 8 0 g ~ '5 ~ ] ~ g <c !ij 1il"g ~ ~ \3
.<::: ~ ClJ til 0 :3: .~ OJ).t:: ClJ - ...c: Iii ...c: :.=.t:: - 5 t<l ClJ ;::l-l3
-g~~~~~e'~~~~~Sl::~~~~~~ ~=~~]~
8 t-' !:l U ~ !ij p... 15 u 1.5 -5 t-' 5l ~ ~ t-' .> t-' ClJ U ." t-' '" ~ f,l ..... <e:
ClJ -'" ClJ s::: ;::l;::l ~~.D 0 go ~ t::-"2
ClJ '+=i~ -~o 00 cO ~~~.... ClJ .,;V"'~
oo~'0.D~'~~...c:~",,,,Qt<l...c:.50J).......c:o..Qtilqu'as":':Q
.-0
ClJ
'"
;::l
I
~
2
o
]
u
,g
OIl
s:::
'f;]
~
~
z
,'<
o
Op...
~E-<
~:8
---
N
,'<
o
o
~ ~I
---
N
M
8:3:
~:3:
---
-
p...
E-<
:8
:3:
:3:
f:::
E-<
~
~
0
~
ClJ
'-"l '-"l '-"l ~
Z Z Z p...
0 0 0
0 0 0
ClJ ClJ ClJ
s::: s::: s:::
0 0 0
z z z
,'< ,'<
0 0 M
0 0 0
~ N 0
--- N
~ - ---
~ - N
--- ---
N N -
,'< ,'<
0 0
0 0
~ ~
\0 \0
N N
--- ---
- -
~ ~
ClJ ClJ
'> '>
ClJ ~
::.:: ~
u -;; ....
~~I ClJ
i:l ....
'"
ClJ ell
~ :8
0 ....
.... 0
.~ -e
ell
~ ::r:
N 0
-0 ~ 0'1
u 0 0
I- 0 0
0 0
....:l ....:l
~ ~
--------
... ._JI'_~II....ir,
,11.:.~IN'l't""
.,I.:t. "ll',...n..~~.. ....~...
,"'&*'., - ~~
:Ol".,",',-~ . ,\,;0.
.~,:,:'-- ':~. ;
':.~, ~ '......... ~
~\ .... .... "Xq;~
~~Jk.....,.,~~.
......,..~TE~j..111
III.
.onditions Associated With .
Case #: FLD2002-11043
1/8/2003
8:39:33AM
FIRl Fire Condition Warn FIRI J C
DRAFT CONDITIONS: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
LAND J Landscape None NOT MET 12/24/2002 MTP
That a landscape plan which meets the requirements of Cdoe to the satisfaction of Staff be submitted to and approved by
Staff prior to the issuance of any permits.
LRRl J Land Resource Condition Warn NOT MET 12/5/2002 R A LRRl 12/512002 R A
Need tree survey prior to building permit.
PNRl J Parks & Recs Condition Warn NOT MET PNRl 12/27/2002 DWR
To determine whether Open Space/Recreation impact fees apply, verification is needed on existing structure, specifically
# of hotel/motel guestrooms and # of residential units. Fees are due prior to building permit or final plat, whichever
occurs first. Contact Deb Richter 727-562-4817.
4 hotel/motel rooms = 1 residential unit, if 24 guestrooms exist and project is for 15 residential units, credit 6 units, and
Open Space/Recreation impact fees will be due for 9 new residential units.
STRM 'Storm Water Condition HwO NOT MET 12/9/2002 EES
1) Need water quality cales
2) Need stormwater cales showing no adverse impacts if tying into City outfall
3) Sub drain details
SWIJ Solid Waste Condition Warn NOT MET SWRl 1/2/2003 TJG
Plans need to show proper dimensions for enclosure before BP 12 foot clear acess for doors to allow service turning
Radius of truck show street dimensions
TERl JTraffic Eng Condition Warn NOT MET TERl 12/1112002 C M
a)Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to e.O.
TERl .J Traffic Eng Condition Warn NOT MET
b )Remove curbing in front of handicap access aisle in front of elevator prior to permitting.
TERl
12/1112002
CM
TERl J Traffic Eng Condition Warn NOT MET TERl 12/1112002 C M
c )Will entryway to parking be gated? If so, show location of gate and clarify operation prior to permitting.
TERl J Traffic Eng Condition Warn NOT MET
d)Visibility triangle requirements not being met - revise prior to permitting
TERl
12/11/2002
CM
Page 1 of 1
CaseConditions..rpt
M ::;s . . ~
0
0 p... i-
N ""
-- - :~
N
-- tr) t;
- c:'! <(
~
tr) '"
U
oil
.5
~
~
0
~
~
ta
II
.~
0
0.
0
~
..c
....
0
;S
- -
g~ g~
~::;s ~::;s
S:l~ ~~
-- --
'Cl 00
~ ~
~~ ~
..... 00 C
..... Q
l:Il Q >
..... Q ..J
~ I m
.....
~Q >-
..... Q ~ '+-<
..... N 0
> r:J)
..... Z 0
..... ~ ~
y ;;:J ~
< m Z ~ p...
:;t; N 0
~ 0) Q Q
l:Il ~ CD
~ fI}
U = II) II)
U = =
0 0
Z Z
- -
0 0
0 0
N ~
--
tr) M
N -
-- --
tr) 00
-0
II)
l:: ;>
~ '0
u .9 c.l
~~I .... ~
c.l -0
II)
0.. .S 0
'" '"
l:: 0
- <<l 0
]- II)
'"
0 <<l
U U
0 0
- tr)
-0 0 0'1
u
..... ::;s ::;s
en en
S S
.
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Richter, Debbie
Friday, December 27,20023:25 PM
Wells, Wayne
RE: FLD2002-11 043, 692 Bayway Boulevard
Resided comment below noted in Permit Plan:
"To determine whether Open Space/Recreation impact fees apply, verification is needed on existing structure,
specifically # of hotel/motel guestrooms and # of residential units. Fees are due prior to building permit or final
plat, whichever occurs first. Contact Deb Richter 727-562-4817.
4 hotel/motel rooms = 1 residential unit, if 24 guestrooms exist and project is for 15 residential units, credit 6
units, and Open Space/Recreation impact fees will be due for 9 new residential units."
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Monday, December 23,200211:28 AM
To: Albee, Rick; Bertels, Paul; Carrier, AI; Colbert, Joseph; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Martens, Cory; Melone,
Donald; Parry, Mark; Richter, Debbie
Subject: FLD2002-11043, 692 Bayway Boulevard
Stormwater Reviewer: Elliot Shoberg
Revised plans are in, A copy is on the cabinets behind my desk next to Rm. 216. Please come by and take a look at the
re-submission. Your comments from the 12/12/02 DRC are below. Please revise your comments in Permit Plan as
appropriate and let me know via email.
Please review ASAP. This case is scheduled for the 1/21/03 COB meeting.
Thanks, Wayne
1:15 p.m. Case: FLD2002-11043 - 692 Bayway Boulevard
Owner: Burnaby Welch Corporation.
Applicant: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
Location: 0.51 acres located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately x feet west ofx.
Atlas Page: 285A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval for attached dwellings with reductions of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to
five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback
from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool equipment
room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback
from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway) and an increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C.
Proposed Use: A IS-unit attached dwelling project with 11 existing docks.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Wayne Wells, Lisa Fierce, Frank Gerlock, Glen Bahnick, Joe Colbert, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Deb Richter, Bill
Morris
Applicant/Representative: Bob Lyons, Deborah Harris, Jeffrey Izzo, Frank Fraze, Steve Page
The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments:
1. Plannine::
a)
b)
Submit the original "Affidavit to Authorize Agent" signed by Susan Crosser.
Will need to record a Unity of Title document in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits
tying all lots together as one lot for development purposes.
Application written material will need to include the height increase proposed, including addressing the
1
c)
General APPlicabilaiteria and the Comprehensive Infill Redevel.nt Project criteria.
d) Columns at east and west ends of building appear to encroach into end parking spaces, making the spaces
nonfunctional. Remove the spaces or revise drawing to make the spaces functional, which will change the
proposed setbacks, site data and site improvements, or if columns don't conflict, dimension the width of the end
parking spaces.
e) The site plan and/or front (south) building elevations are unclear whether columns on first, second and third
floors (elevated) are on a cantilevered walkway or whether the columns extend to the ground floor. If the
columns extend to ground level, indicate such on the site plan and such columns may affect placement of the
dumpster enclosure.
j) There are 11 existing docks with live aboards - need to address what will happen to dockslboats - the
boats and live aboards will be removed
g) Platting? Will do a condo plat
2. Traffic ene:ineerine::
a) Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to e.o.
b) Remove curbing in front of handicap access aisle in front of elevator, prior to permitting.
c) Will entryway to parking be gated? If so, show location of gate and clarify operation prior to permitting.
Will not be gated
d) Visibility triangle requirements not being met - there is a slight encroachment - revise prior to permitting.
Will slide it over
3. Stormwater:
a) Need water quality cales - prior to cdb
b) Need stormwater cales showing no adverse impacts if tying into City outfall- prior to cdb
c) Subdrain details - prior to cdb
4. Solid waste:
a) Turn Radius from street needed to be shown - if trucks cannot turn in - will need to pull out dumpster for city;
cannot use template to judge; applicant will plat the turning movement on the plans
b) Need detail of enclosure to City specifications, 12 foot clear door opening access - if rollout container will
need staging area on property
5.
2
Parks and Recreation:
a) To detennine whether Open Space/Recreation impact fees apply, existing structure information is needed,
specifically number of hotel/motel guestrooms and residential units. Fees are due prior to building permit or
[mal plat, whichever occurs first. Contact Deb Richter 727-562-4817.
6. Landscaninf!:
a) The design should include some elements of symmetry on either side of the driveway - would look better;
b) Clearly show all bedlines;
c) Recommend using sabal palms along the south side of the site and Washingtonians elsewhere; they will be
more in scale against the building;
Provide a continuous hedge along the sides of the site honoring the sight visibility triangle at the water side;
The location of the india hawthorn masses at the southeast and southwest corners of the site do not make
sense - the taller hedge material should be in back with the lower plant material in front;
The entrance (on either side of the driveway) should receive a better treatment - use additional groundcover,
use tiered effect (could use variegated jasmine, liriope, beach sunflower, etc.);
The hedge along the east side of the should be along the property line;
Clarify what plant material will be located in all the blank areas (use salt tolerant ground covers, xeriscape);
The landscape design needs a sense of uniformity or of a theme - suggest enlisting the aid of a landscape
professional to redraw and resubmit the landscape plan; and
Address all of the above prior to CDB review.
.
.
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
7. Land resource:
a) Need tree survey prior to building permit. There are palm trees in the area and appear to be on the site
8. Harbor Master:
a) Live aboards are there now and are not compatible with upland development they will be removed; existing
docks have no navigational hazards; don't know how they are structurally - county would do the inspection
and determine if meets code
9. Fire:
a) DRAFT CONDITION: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
10. Environmental:
a) No comments
11. General enf!ineerinf!:
a) Construction details not shown, prior to building pennit
b) 15 units using two 6" sanitary service "wye's" - will need to see these a two trunk lines, will need to see
more details at time of building pennit;
c) water system will need to be looped, prior to building permit
NOTES:
*15 sets of revised plans, application, etc are due to Planning by Friday, December 20th for review by CDB on January
21,2003
. email thesecommentsto:sunwestlvons@aol.com<mailto:sunwestlvons@aol.com>;nestech@aol.com
<mamo: nestech@aol.com>
3
e
.
Wells, Wayne
Subject:
Wells, Wayne
Monday, December 23, 2002 11 :28 AM
Albee, Rick; Bertels, Paul; Carrier, AI; Colbert, Joseph; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom;
Gluski, Roberta; Martens, Cory; Melone, Donald; Parry, Mark; Richter, Debbie
FLD2002-11043, 692 Bayway Boulevard
From:
Sent:
To:
Stormwater Reviewer: Elliot Shoberg
Revised plans are in. A copy is on the cabinets behind my desk next to Rm, 216. Please come by and take a look at the
re-submission, Your comments from the 12/12/02 DRC are below. Please revise your comments in Permit Plan as
appropriate and let me know via email.
Please review ASAP. This case is scheduled for the 1/21/03 CDB meeting.
Thanks, Wayne
1:15 p.m. Case: FLD2002-11043 - 692 Bayway Boulevard
Owner: Burnaby Welch Corporation.
Applicant: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
Location: 0.51 acres located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately x feet west ofx.
Atlas Page: 285A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval for attached dwellings with reductions of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to
five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback
from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool equipment
room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback
from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway) and an increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C.
Proposed Use: A IS-unit attached dwelling project with 11 existing docks.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Wayne Wells, Lisa Fierce, Frank Gerlock, Glen Bahnick, Joe Colbert, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Deb Richter, Bill
Morris
Applicant/Representative: Bob Lyons, Deborah Harris, Jeffrey Izzo, Frank Fraze, Steve Page
The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments:
1. Plannin2:
a)
b)
Submit the original "Affidavit to Authorize Agent" signed by Susan Crosser.
Will need to record a Unity of Title document in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits
tying all lots together as one lot for development purposes.
Application written material will need to include the height increase proposed, including addressing the
General Applicability criteria and the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria.
Columns at east and west ends of building appear to encroach into end parking spaces, making the spaces
nonfunctional. Remove the spaces or revise drawing to make the spaces functional, which will change the
proposed setbacks, site data and site improvements, or if columns don't conflict, dimension the width of the end
parking spaces.
The site plan and/or front (south) building elevations are unclear whether columns on first, second and third
floors (elevated) are on a cantilevered walkway or whether the columns extend to the ground floor. If the
columns extend to ground level, indicate such on the site plan and such columns may affect placement of the
dumpster enclosure.
There are 11 existing docks with live aboards - need to address what will happen to dockslboats - the
boats and live aboards will be removed
g) Platting? Will do a condo plat
2. Traffic en2ineerin2:
a) Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
b) Remove curbing in front of handicap access aisle in front of elevator, prior to permitting.
c) Will entryway to parking be gated? If so, show location of gate and clarify operation prior to permitting.
c)
d)
e)
j)
1
Will not be gated . .
d) Visibility triangle requirements not being met - there is a slight encroachment - revise prior to pennitting.
Will slide it over
3. Stormwater:
a) Need water quality cales - prior to cdb
b) Need stormwater cales showing no adverse impacts if tying into City outfall- prior to cdb
c) Subdrain details - prior to cdb
4. Solid waste:
a) Turn Radius from street needed to be shown - if trucks cannot turn in - will need to pull out dumpster for city;
cannot use template to judge; applicant will plat the turning movement on the plans
b) Need detail of enclosure to City specifications, 12 foot clear door opening access - if rollout container will
need staging area on property
5.
2
Parks and Recreation:
a) To determine whether Open Space/Recreation impact fees apply, existing structure information is needed,
specifically number of hotel/motel guestrooms and residential units. Fees are due prior to building permit or
final plat, whichever occurs first. Contact Deb Richter 727-562-4817.
6. Landscanine::
a) The design should include some elements ofsynnnetry on either side of the driveway - would look better;
b) Clearly show all bedlines;
c) Recommend using sabal palms along the south side of the site and Washingtonians elsewhere; they will be
more in scale against the building;
Provide a continuous hedge along the sides of the site honoring the sight visibility triangle at the water side;
The location of the india hawthorn masses at the southeast and southwest comers of the site do not make
sense - the taller hedge material should be in back with the lower plant material in front;
The entrance (on either side of the driveway) should receive a better treatment - use additional groundcover,
use tiered effect (could use variegated jasmine, liriope, beach sunflower, etc.);
The hedge along the east side of the should be along the property line;
Clarify what plant material will be located in all the blank areas (use salt tolerant ground covers, xeriscape);
The landscape design needs a sense of uniformity or of a theme - suggest enlisting the aid of a landscape
professional to redraw and resubmit the landscape plan; and
Address all of the above prior to CDB review.
.
.
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
7. Land resource:
a) Need tree survey prior to building permit. There are palm trees in the area and appear to be on the site
8. Harbor Master:
a) Live aboards are there now and are not compatible with upland development they will be removed; existing
docks have no navigational hazards; don't know how they are structurally - county would do the inspection
and determine if meets code
9. Fire:
a) DRAFT CONDITION: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
10. Environmental:
a) No comments
11. General ene:ineerine::
a) Construction details not shown, prior to building permit
b) 15 units using two 6" sanitary service "wye's" - will need to see these a two trunk lines, will need to see
more details at time of building permit;
c) water system will need to be looped, prior to building permit
NOTES:
*15 sets of revised plans, application, etc are due to Planning by Friday, December 20th for review by CDB on January
21,2003
. email thesecommentsto:sunwestlvons{iVaol.com<mailto:sunwestlvons(ti)aol.com>;nestech{iVaol.com
<mailto: nestech{iVaol.com>
3
Pinellas County Property APpr.r Information: 1729 1505004001 01.
Page 2 of5
17 / 29 / 15 / 05004 / 001 / 0210
09-Dec-2002 Jil"l Sl"lith, CFA Pinella~ County Property Apprai~er 11:34:16
Non-Residential P rope rty Address, Use, and Sales
COl"lparable ~ale~ value a~ Prop Addr: 692 BAV.....AV BLUD N
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t : 260.02
~ale~ frol"l 2000 - 2001 :
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Il"lp
Plat Inforl"lation 10/1.999 10,695/ 54 1.150,000 (H) I
1955 : Book 038 Pg~ 038-039 0 /1.912 3,151/ 494 420,000 (Q) U
0000 : Book Pg~ - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pg~ - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
2002 Value EXEMP nONS
Just/Market: 1,090,000 HOl"le~tead: 0 Ownership 1 . 000
Hi~toric : 0 Use X: .000
A~sessed/Cap: 1,090,000 Tax Exel"lp t 1: .000
Other Exel"lpt: 0
Taxable: 1. 090, 000 Agricul tural: 0
2002 Tax Inforl"lation Land Inforl"'lation
District: C..... Seawall: Frontage: Bay
Clearwater View:
02 Millage: 23.2911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Unit~ Meth
02 Taxes: 25,381.30
1) 120 x 120 45. 00 14,514.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Wi thou t the Save-Our-Hol"le~ 4) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
cap, 2002 taxe~ will be : 5) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
25.381.30 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exel"lption~. Total Land Value: 655,830
2002 taxes will be :
25,381.30
Short Legal BAVSIDE SUB NO. 5 BLK A, LOTS 21 & 22 & RIP
De~cription RTS
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/9/2002
..
Pinellas County Property APpr.r Information: 1729 1505004001 01.
Page 3 of5
17 / 29 / 15 / 05004 / 001 / 0210 :01
09-Dec-ZOOZ Ji~ s~ith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:34:16
Co~~ercial Card 01 of 1 IMprove~ent Type: Hotel/Hotel < 4 St
Property Address: 69Z BAVWAV BLVD N Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39
Structural Elements
Foundation
Floor SysteM
Exterior Wall
Height Factor
Party Wall
Structural Fra~e
Roo f Fra~e
Roof Cover
Cabinet & Mill
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
Partition Factor
Continuous Footing
Slab on Grade
Cone Block/Stucco
o
None
Hasonry Pillar&Steel
Flat
Built Up/Co~position
Above Average
Carpet Co~bination
P laste r Fu rred
o
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling SpIt
Fixtures 11
Bath Tile
Electric
Shape Factor
Qual ity
Year Built
Effective Age
Other Depreciation
Function Depreciation
Econo~ic Depreciation
Wall Only
Above Average
Rectangle
Ave rage
1. 951
Z5
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 10.484 7) .00 0
2) Open Po rch .30 Z.506 B) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) . 00 0
Commercial Extra Features
Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) DOCK 19Z5F 15.00 19Z 0 1. 150 1.915
2) ASPHALT ZZOOSF 1. 00 Z. ZOO 0 Z.ZOO 999
3) CONC PAVE 43ZSF Z.OO 43Z 0 860 999
4) POOL 800SF Z5. 000.00 1 0 10.000 1. 915
5) DOCK 580SF 15.00 580 0 3.480 1. 915
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TO TA L RECORD VALUE: 11.690
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[IJ[f]~g]
http://pao,co.pinellas.f1.uslhtbin/cgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/9/2002
l'~el1as County Property APpr.r Information: 1729 1505004001 O.
Page 2 of5
17 / 29 / 15 / 05004 / 001 / 0230
09-Dec-2002 JifTl SfTlith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:35:15
Uacant Propert9 Use and Sales
COfTlparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Tract: 260.02
sales frofTl 2000 - 2001 :
0 Sale Date DR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac / IfTlp
Plat InforfTlation 10/1.999 10.6951 54 1.150.000 (M) U
1955: Book 038 Pgs 038-039 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
0000 : Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
2002 Value EXEMP TIDNS
Just/Market: 261. 100 HOfTlestead: 0 Ownership 1 .000
Historic : 0 Use X: .000
Assessed/Cap: 261. 100 Tax ExefTlp t 1: .000
Other ExefTlp t : 0
Taxable: 261. 100 Agricultural: 0
2002 Tax InforfTlation Land InforfTlation
District: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater View:
02 Millage: 23. 2911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: 6.081. 31
1) 64 x 120 40.00 7.680.00 S
Special Tax . 00 2) 0 x 0 . 00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HofTles 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
6.081. 31 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exefTlptions, Total Land Value: 307.200
2002 taxes will be :
6.081.31
Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO 5 BLK A. LOT 23 8c RIP RTS
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=,16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/9/2002
P'11ellas County Property APpr.r Information: 1729 1505004001 O.
Page 3 of5
17 / 29 / 15 / 05004 / 001 / 0230
09-Dec-ZOOZ Ji~ s~ith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser
Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10
17:35:16
Vacant Extra Features
Description Di~ensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) .00 0 0 0 0
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][f]~~
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/9/2002
e
e
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
January 21, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.rn., in Commission Chambers, third floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola
Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishinl! to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetinl!, Those
cases that are not contested bv the applicant. staff, neil!hborinl! property owners. etc. will be placed on a
consent al!enda and approved bv a sinl!le vote at the bel!inninl! of the meetinl!.
1. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Decade 80-XIV (Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC) - flexible development approval to
increase the height of a building with attached dwellings from 30 feet to 149 feet (as measured from base flood
elevation), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C, and to reduce the
buffer width along the north property line from 10 feet to 5 feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the
provisions ofSec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: 146 attached condominium dwellings, 8 attached townhome dwellings,
120-slip marina [73 public slips and 43 slips reserved for condos] and 7,500 square-foot nonresidential uses
[restaurant/ship's store/marina office]) at 900 North Osceola Ave., J.A. Gorra Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-3; Sue Barco Sub,
Lots 1, 13-14 & 22-23; and F. T. Blish's Sub, Lots 1-3 & 8-10, FLD2002-10036. (TO BE CONTINUED TO
DATE UNCERTAIN)
2. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Peter J. Hunt, TRE - flexible development approval to terminate the status of a
nonconforming structure to permit an existing 18.5-foot rear/waterfront (east) setback (to building) where a 25-foot
setback is required, under the provisions ofSec 6-109. (Proposed Use: Existing detached dwelling with an 18.5-foot
rear setback to building) at 849 Harbor Island, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 6D, 7 A, 7C, Lot 44. FLD 2002-
10034
3. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Morton Plant Hospital Association. Inc, - flexible development application to revise a
master site plan previously approved by the City Commission in 1995 and subsequently amended by the Community
Development Board in January 2000 and October 2002, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
including the following requests (* indicates previously approved site development standards as part of the original
Master Plan and subsequent amendments by the Community Development Board):
. Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to existing auxiliary shop)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Pine lias Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing Powell Cancer Pavilion)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Druid Road from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement);*
. Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building);*
. Reduction in front (east) setback along South Fort Harrison Avenue from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Magnolia Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in side (east and west) setback along the Pinellas Trail right-of-way from 25 feet to five feet (to
pavement)*;
. Reduction in side setback along all other sides from 25 feet to 15 feet*;
. Increase in height of a parking garage from 50 feet to 59 feet*;
. Increase in height of a medical clinic from 30 feet to 45 feet*;
. Increase in the height of a hospital building from 50 feet to a maximum of 103 feet*.
(Proposed Use: Changes to an approved Master Plan including improved storrnwater facilities, the addition of
property enlarging the campus, the replacement and/or enlargement of seven buildings and the addition of three
parking garages) at 300 Pinellas St" Sec 21-29-15, M&B's 12.01, 12.02, 12.03, 12.12, 12,15,21.01,21.02 & 21.03;
Magnolia Park, Blk 35 Lots 1-9 & Lots 14-22 and E 10 ft of a 60 ft abandoned RR right-of-way; Magnolia Park, Blk
38, Lots 1-8 inclusive and 1/2 vac streetN, Lots 15, 16, 17, 18-22 inclusive; Bluff View, Lots 16-26 & E 31 ft of Lot
27 and less 10 ft vac alley adj on Riess E; Milton Park, Blk 5, Lots 1-6 & N 1/2 vac alley adj on S; Milton Park, Blk
7, Lots 1-7 and vac alley between Lots 2-7 and N 1/2 vac alleyadj S of Lot I; S.J. Reynold's Sub., Lots 1-5 & N 20
ft of Lot 6, Lot 7-9; J.B. Roberts Sub, Lots 1-2 & 1/2 vac alley on E less road. in NW corner SD Lot I, Lots 3-5 &
7-11 inclusive and vac alley between & pt unnm lot ofPoms Park lying S; Poms Park, E 93.68 ft ofwmumbered
tract S of Pine lias Ave & N 1/2 ofvac St. on S; Petzold Gulf View, Lot 3 & part of Lot 2 & 4; Turners AC Add to
Milton Park Blks A&B & 1/2 vac st on N; Heart and Vascular Pavilion, Commercial Condo - Common Elements;
Westover, Elk A, Lots 1-22 & vac rds on E & S; Westover, Blk B, Lots 1,2,3 and Lot 7 and W 14 ft of Lot 6 and
Lots 8-17 & vac Pinellas St. adj on N and Lot 4 of Barnes, W.N. Sub, Bluff View Court E 18 ft of Lots 1,7,9,11,
13,15,17,19 & 20 W for road, All of Bluff View Court sub including right of ways less 18 ft for Reynolds Avenue
right of way and unplatted land adjacent on W, and Westover Blk B, Lots 4-5 and E 39.3 ft of Lot 6. FLD 2002-
10035
4. Beach Motel Manal!ement (The Moorings Townhomes) - flexible development approval (I) to permit attached
dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to 3 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), a reduction of
the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to pool dcck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) of a 6-slip, multi-use dock, under the provisions of Sec 3-601;
and preliminary plat approval for 6 lots. (Proposed Use: A 6-unit attached dwelling development with a 6-s1i, multi-
..
e
e
use dock) at 620 Bavwav Blvd. (The Moorings I), Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 9 & 10 and riparian rights. FLD
2002-11 039/PL T 2002-11 003
5. Cotel, Inc. (The Moorings Townhomes) - flexible development approval to permit attached dwellings with a
reduction of the front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to 3 feet (to pavement), reductions of
the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from
10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement) and from 10 to 2 feet (to pool deck) and a reduction of the rear (north)
setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Inftll Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Sec 2-803.C and preliminary plat approval for 6 lots. (Proposed Use: A 6-unit attached dwelling
development with an existing 6-slip. multi-use dock) at 674 Bavwav Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 19 &
20. FLD 2002-11038/PLT 2002-11002
6. Bril!htwater Investment Establishment (Angelika Marocordes) - flexible development approval for attached
dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building)
and from 10 feet to 6 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building)
and from 10 feet to 6 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building)
and from 20 feet to 0 feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way,
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions ofSec 2-803.C and preliminary plat approval
for 10 lots. (Proposed Use: A 10-unit attached dwelling development) at 161 Bril!htwater Dr., Bayside Sub No.2,
Lots 14-16 inclusive. FLD 2002-11042/PLT 2002-11005
7. Gus DiGiovanni (Bayway Townhomes, LLC) - flexible development approval (I) to permit attached dwellings
with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback
from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), reductions of the side (west) setback
from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement and building), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to
walkway), under the provisions ofSec 2-803.C; and (2) for a 10-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions ofSec 3-
601; and preliminary plat approval for 11 lots. (Proposed Use: An II-unit attached dwelling project with 10 docks)
at 656 Bavwav Blvd" Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 15-18. FLD 2002-11041/PLT 2002-11004
8. Burnabv Welch Corporation - flexible development approval for attached dwellings with reductions of the front
(south) setback from 15 feet to 5 feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to 9 feet (to stairwell), a
reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from
10 feet to 5 feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway) and an
increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet (as measured from base flood elevation), as a Comprehensive Inftll
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: A 15-unit attached dwelling
development with an existing II-slip dock) at 692 Bavwav Blvd" Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 21-23. FLD
2002-11 043
9. Carlouel Yacht Club - flexible development approval for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet by 250
feet floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to 6 feet,
under the provisions of Sec 3-601. (Proposed use: A 10-foot wide by 250-foot long floating dock [adjacent to
seawall]) at 1091 Eldorado Ave" MandalayReplat, Blk 171, Lots 6-11 and part of Lots 4 & 5. FLD 2002-10033
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the
Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the
Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such
purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105.
All individuals spealOng on public hearing items will be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staffreports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review
by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning
Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call (727) 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
Planning Department
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500
FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES, ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REOUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL OFFICIAL RECORDS &
LEGISLATIVE SERVICES WITH THEIR REOUEST AT (727) 562-4093.
Ad: 01/05/03
e
(to j()()j
I fO L/~g CO-f),e- ( / F )
1-6f51/
No.e 77-1 's1/) e..... EN G:> / AI F-G l!-, At '"
o/e /-1 aa 6/1 G/I () 'y 1'l1E-e:..
b 0 r C-~t!!.v' e. ~ A-N b c;3T.
<2,t..~Aea.J.4 77E!el 1='1..., 3.375-5
~
FL INT IMP FUND TRE
clo BEL CREST CONDO INC
706 BAYlIJ?W 8L VD
CLE(.lP1f)f'1TER FL
3:3767 2609
CLINKSCALE, ROBERT M
800 SAYWAY BLVD , 10
CI_EARItJP,TER FL"
~,:5767
HODGE " HP,RRY E
HODGE::" 8{,',F~B(:ln(~
[145 ~3 GUE.I"'VIE'I\'
CLE()F;:v\I()TI::R F"E,
:;-;3:76'7 2"':'1.:)14
TRE
T Tr-~[
E3LVD H':~;08
WALDEMAR, GEORGE TEST
C/O WALDEMAR, GEORGE A PR
316 FOX HH,L DR
CLAVERTON NY
1192:3
(1i'iOS, THOMPtS E
f'1MOS, FI~ANCES C
4079 AQUARINA ST
'f,I(~ TERFOF~D t.J I
482,29 2117
e
(!t...r==..;q ,e.. tv ,q- ~ If?- 4.~ (}. H A 'St.A'"
Sf:17 rrlClv\oIClJo...y F\ \l-e,
Cle~V'LQ.Lter) f=L 337'-7
~/tNb ~'I C/'f' (!... A"{;, SAtI
I L/-8o b v It: 8. \ vd. t:\=-( 0 ").,
C l eO-,,~.~:o.J-cf J t=L 3 3,7 (., 7
BAYSIOE CONDO ASSN INC
800 i3(i'Y'\~(W E3L VO
CLEO: (~Fl',,\! I:i TEFl Fe L.
3~3767 2615
SHERRARD, HENRY J TRE
HODGE, HARRY E TRE
845 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~204
CL.E(.lR~!(-'1TEr? E=L.
:~;2)767 3012
WALDEMAR, MARGARET M
1401 GULF BLVD # 116
CLE(iFlv,,1(',TER I"L
3::.3167" 2f\32
NICHOLSON, FAY A
NICHOLSON, CHARLES W
948 RIVERSIDE RIDGE
TARPON SPRINGS FL
:,:Se--l6ng 8:!:3()()
MC CANNON, NORMAN J JR
MC CANNON, MARY T
90 NORTH ST
1"\0("\;')(:'1'1 1'4(:\
OJ.OO 1. 131:2
e
SHERRARD, HENRY J TRE
HODGE, HARRY E TRE
845 S GULFVIEW BLVD #204
CLE(lR1iJI'i TER F'L
:3:3?67 :30.12
SCHULMAN, SUSAN H
SCHULMAN, HELEN P
2.10 CARYL W,'1Y
OLDSt'1~,P FL
:)t~-67{7 :2265
Sr'IEF1RAFm" HENRY
HODGE. OmlN{) r1
845 ~S GULF'VIEW
CL,.EI'iPvJf'i Tr:::F< F'L
J HIE
TPr:::
BI_,\i[) 1+20"1
::;~)76"l :,)0.12
WALDEMAR. GEORGE
WALDEMAR, DEBORAH
:316 FO>< HILt_ or~
BAITING HOLLOW NY
.11 ''):5:5 9506
GASIK, FORREST M
18 J(~r'iES S1
BEVEf;<L, Y iviA
01915
i'100RINGS" THE
9100 BAY HILL BLVD
OI~L_AND() FL.
~528_19
COT[L, INC
674 B{~Yv\lf'iY BLVD
CLr,AR~'JA TEF( FI"
:3;316'7 2601
ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS
ANASTASOPOULOS, HEl[N
1600 GULF BLVD i+ PHNO 1
CLE{~F~!oIIATEf< FOl
.33761 :?9'73
CAP[lUTO FAMILY PTNSHP
C,/O F<C)LlAND ROX
28050 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 10
ClEP,R1toiATE,P FL
~3376.1 2600
POLITIS, GREGORY
965 S BAYSHOR[ BLVD
SAFETY HARBOR Fl
:;54695 42.1"7
ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS
ANASTASOPOULOS. ANASTASI OS
630 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CLEI'iF<I,,!(-)T[r;~ FL,
:~)3l6 7 2(,42
.
HODGE" l'j(~Fi~FI.'{
SHERRARD, HENPY TRE
845 S GUlFVIEW BLVD i+ 204
CLEAr~I",IATER Fl.,
~)~576l 5012
4;f~~~~;2() 2.11'7
,] Tf;~::',
Tr~~[
I3f" VD Ii' 20.:1
FURLETTI. ROBERT
FURlETTI, HEl[N A
li3? L,E,NOX p,I/E:
1'1EI',) l'iIL.FOFI.D NJ
o -,ll~) 4 (;. 2 (~-' 1 :~:3
c
01 GIOI/ANNI PARTNERS-BAYWAY
CI'iF'R I EF~(~--B(-~YliJAY
16,:; [1(-'iY3ID[ DR
CLE(~RIJ..If~TEI;~ FL..
:5516'7
()
BURNABY WELCH CORP
692 13(~"'/1,,\1(:~~'(" E3L \lD
CL,E{\RIt'!(',TF:f;,~ FL.
-'"
:53767 2t:..Ol
clll"F IJSF~I I HC
655 S GULFVIEW BLI/D
CL_E(,"F<I,,',!(.~,TER FL,
::;;~:s l(~ 7
ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS
POLITIS, GREGORY C
6:30 S GULFVIEW BLI/D
CLE(lF'~v,!r,TEF< Fl
:5376.7
1.9 i.j :3Tt: ,l()
";?(>oo
ALPHA BEACH RESORT IHC
645 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CL.Ef~IF<I,'I,II'iTCFI. F'L
:~:376'? 2(;,4~')
.
.
SEAWAKE MOTEL LTD
691 S QULFVIEW BLVD
CLE:,~r-~li,J,"'TEf~ E::L
~~:~:~-UJr' ~;~:~:I~ ;,....~I_.~;;~.: \~" E~i: I ;~1~1
CL_E:,'~h~ .. r ..F
3:576-- .
3~3767 264;5
E 1;. !l INC
1600 GULF BLVD n PHI
CLE(lm~,nEH FL
ANASTOPOULOS, ELIAS
16(,),0 .Cl.n _1",'." HLp''L tl Pill.
CLEnf:;lti, fF"R r.c
T"""'7r '
,.,_J~_,) II,,,) '(/
::5~)767 2924
LANE C~WR LTD PARTNERSHIP
1 LJ4NE CENTER
1200 SHI":RI1E:F: PO
NOFiTHBRClOI<. 11_
60062 4500
BAYWAV S~~ORES CONDO
(4;;:;SH I HC
r::lC) E:~OX :3882
CLEi~lf~(,I,",TEFI FI._
::52:,)'6 7 8(38~?
ALDINGER, GUENTER
("L.D I NG[f~, DAGI1fiR
SCHlli,~L_BENv\IEG 4
74395 MUNDELSHEIM
GERr"I(li'jY
ZAREMBA, THOMAS S
1 SEAGATE STE 999
TOLEDO OH
43604
GAPUlND, JEFf'"
Gr:),FiLAr,iD" FCEZI3E
640 BAYWAY BLVD n 103
CU:;!),FiVi() TER FL
GIAMMATTEI. CAROL
GIAMMATTEI, GUIDO
640 BAYWAY BLVD # 104
C;L,[(4r-,I,Io!(',TCFi FL,
5376 7 260~3
:::;; :~; "7 (S )'f :::;::. I:::., 0 ::;:,
L. I i'1f~RES, m'HHONY
640 BAYWAY BLVD n 105
CLEr:':R~'J,"'TER FL
SHEFFIELD, MARGARET C
SHEFFIELD, JAMES S
640 BAVWAY BLVD # 1.06
33767
CLE"':HI^,IATE:F< FL
:3376)' 2606
H,"'W(Hj~3, ,JOHN tv!
640 BAYWAY BLVD . 201
CLE(-~PIN(\TEF< FL
:~)~:.)76 -; 2()06
DE VD~:;, POE;Er"T
PO BO)< 476
CLEAFI~,,1(l TEfl FL
rFlE
:",:,:375'7 ()..476
,JANIS, ,JOHr~
1.0~50() S L.OHG (!,VE
014f<, L,c,v,)t'j I L.
60453 464<5
CONRAD, FlONALD J SR
2; () 1. D CJt'j ~...JI::r Of:;
E,'':ST OllBUCiUE IL
61025:, 9,S23
WAGNER, WILLIAM H
WAGNER, JOSEPHINE C
559 LORING VILLAGE CT
IJR(lt".iG,E Pf',RI< FO!...
8(lLi<TI'j, .](lt1[S t.j
640 BAYWAY BLVD W 206
C:LE:(lFlll'!"~ T[:11 FI_
~:)207:~p
:;';-)767 2604
FiUSSELL, SHELDON P
1415 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RO
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN
5'.".120 ,1002
MC MULLIN, DONALD J
Me MULLIN, MARGARE:T U rR[
500 JOHN F I<E:NNEDY BLVD I 62
I;.! I LOhl()O[) i'j.]
oe:?e~O 58';'1
VUJIC, GPOZO(:IN
3321 SAWMILL VALLEY DR
MISSISSAUGA ON L5L 3C9
C (:\ 1'11'1 0;::)
MOSCA, ANTOINE C
M(JSC(~, L(;f~I~' L
1875 MCCAULEY RD
CLE,'~FI(,\lr'1TEFi r'~L
32376':) :.1.512
1,,100D3, NOEL D
640 BAYWAY BLVD ~ 305
CLE(lHI~,Ir:~TEH FL
::'~:; ~:s }' 6 7 ~? (,OS
FOLEY, BETHANY A
FDL.r::"'(' .JCIH1-.j F~
640 8AYWAY BLVD U 306
CL.E:(.ll,:I;.!(',TE:P r-"L
~~i:,5)"6 '? 2(:)05
.
.
Vl),JIC, V!:::R,~',
640 BAVWAY BLVD W 303
CLE(.4R\'iI'2jTEF( F'L
BEL CREST CONDO INC
l 0 'c:" [I I'i V liJ (Yy' E3 L V ()
CLI::,'~F(I/o!(,rER FL.
':S~37'61 ~260r)
~557'67 2605
WARNER HOSPITALITY
70(, !3(WV,)(:"'{ Bl_ VD
CL.E(.4RW~"TER F'L,
1,,'!(."f~t'J,EI~)
706 B(.~
C:L_E,clF<.i
33767
:)~~;'?67
.3:37(,7
1,',I(\PNEFl ()'IO:3P J,,:,r:)~IrY
706 r,3(1)," ,\I( Y.~1f':1 '(,"01
".! 1"(\1"1/' "1" '1'1 "" 'J
L.. ',_ ~'. ", r. ,,// "i r::',
'''''''',.' J/ I
,),:,:. I C, ,r
2';~)"76
1/o1(':\R~lJ,F'~ HOSPIT(.~LIr'y'
706 .' ,y,',1(\Y~<:L_\iD
CLoF!' ,)( T 'r~ I "L
3::-57 ) 7-
WAm~E~ HOSPITALITY
1,'0,",':' 13~i '.1~)(4"{ 13,. I
cu::m"< 'T "f'< F'I
3;5767
~,,;, ~lR. NI~.:P H~" :"", PI,..., T !~L..' I TY
/0;: ~W~It, "'~ ::l~t\I;~
."LLAFlI;.)(-il E, 'VfJ
3371~,7
1",I(\Hi'J,EF:~, SCOT T P:
KELLAN. PATRICIA A
'70(" BA"/I,n,l:!~~Y BL.. V[)
1::L.Ef:)RI~,I() TER FL,
::5 ~:~; '''/6 '7
TROPICAL PALMS DEV CORP
706 U(Y~'II\I()\' E3L. VD
CL.EI~F('",I,cl TEl', F:L,
::5:5167' '2609
CLEARWATEP POINT rOWNHOUSE
COrJ,[)O (ISSN
7:1..6 [3{~'y'hl~)II,( [;:I.._\/[)
CL.E(IH\",I(~ TEF< FI._
~,2)7(~7' 266il
HANSELMAN, MARGARET M
206 P(qLr'iETTO I~[)
CL"E(;~I'<\~AT[F( F"L
::A)~37S6 1430
MASSELL, GEORGE M I
716 BAVWAY BLVD W 7
Cl,E(:lRI~,1PI TE:F< FL.
:~; ~5 "/6 ",f" :2 {:, 6 C-j.
liC GE:E:, JOHr'.1 P
PO 80>< 3455
CLE:ARWATER [lEACH FL
:53"767 8455
f'IOF"NE ,rHCH'i,~)S L
PO [:0::,< ~,009
CL.F~(',HI,,\IA TEr~ I"L_
35767 8()09
.
.
ROANE" DOUGlj)S C
716 BAYWAY BLVD # 5
CL.E(~RW(.-lTEI~~ FL.
;~;3;7(:)}' 2661.1.
BESSINGER, ROBERT N
BESSINGER, ELAINE A
716 BAYWAY BLVD ~ Q
CLE()F(I,h,I() TEFl Fi
.:::);57'67 2(-:>6.,..<j,.
BENDERLY, IVl TRE
875 I,hi END (:~Vr:
1'1 I:: I/I! 'y'ORK NY
10025 .4919
f~t"i()ROSO" D,~H I [L
(It-'jOROSO" Jr::PIN
201 WILTSHIRE RD
1,h)\'I'lNChIUOD PA
1.90()6 :?:;~3:5:2
KAMINSKAS" STEVEN W
K,At'iI hISKAS, L.E I SA
4N160 H(~I,nJTHORNE
ElEt',!SEr~VIL.L[: IL
60101~:.l 3343
SP(iGNOU~, JOHN
Sr)AGNOLA~ ROSAt_VN C
675 S GULFVIEW ElLVD # 20~
C L E:: (~r;~ I,I} (~ "r [: r~ F' L~
:::S ::5 ')" (, '? ::;? 6 (l (;,
DE VITA, MICHAEL J
DE VITf~ 'I HELEN C
22"1 ~;EL,L..Y BL.VD
STfYfEN ISL(~ND NY
10314
CONTINENTAL TOWERS INC
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 206
CL..E(iRI,n!()T[R FL.
33767 2646
Hell.. T, DOUGL(~S
1'10L.T, SUE [
2:,245 s l"'~l^l'''tl 17
CRESCENT CITY i~L
322.1.2 9608
DAL.[j"l, P{-jl)L,Ii.,J,E
Dr;L[N, PHILIP
239 N MILL RD # 203A
(,DD I SOt,! I I"
C,0101
FU~PF', PH I 1_.1 P ~r
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 301
CLE(lf~ll,!p~T[oF? FL.
CICCARELLO, LAURENT ~
CICCARELLO, JUDY
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD tt 302
CI...r:::nFi.VI,;TC:F: 1'''1.
:~5;~)76 '1 :~:,S46
:s :S '71:::) 7" 2: 6 ~:l (,
MONCRIEFl, J SCOTT
MONCRIEFF, SUZANNE S
5 TOt10hf~ VTEhl DFi.
ORt"IOND E:Ef~CH Fel.
25217 !-1. ~5851
CHIAPPA, JOSEPH M
HOO\,!'EFI" r'Rr~"H<: Fi.
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 30~
CL,E:(')F;~VI(;I TE:F: f"L
:53'767 26.46
:<(lLLpIS" I_[:LA
4 Elf),Y \lIE:W CIP
S()LE:r-l ri(l
01970 26,<'0
::~ 1'"1 E VNI" t'ilc), NO ,J H
DIPT, t'iP,:31,)t-'ir.~ ,'I
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD W 3~S
CL,E(lF(I,,\)() TI:eR f"L
32S7(;,7 26E:,'}
**********
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 307
CLE(~Fi.\l,lpl T CF( FL
PETRlh, CONSTANCE C TRE
675 :3 GULFVIf:~1,1 E3I,..VD II .5();':';
C~L,[!:ll~lih~ TEecH f'L
3~:;767' 2657
:5~51(t7 2657
t.1[:YEFI. J(,I'1E:,,; V\I
1'1[YEFI, L.II'~Dfl 1\
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 401
CLEPJF<~\III(')T[FI 1"1.
KUDER. RICHARD C
hUDER, JOSEPHINE M
1324 CCH3I3L.ER U,I
()I~L[NrOI,\IH PA
1810A 9?':;':()
~:S37{.'o7 :;:~6S7
OFSTEDAL, IRVIN J
OFSTEDAL, LUCILLE
675 S GULFVI[W BLVD # A03
(~L.[c(.\F<~VJ;~TEr~ FL
~'S:3167 2()S7
~\tDLF[" .]()HI'I (1
SOl. [FilE nV[
TAi"iP(, 1"1...
~~;.3 I~_~' 0 6,
WEG., :<P:)f~L,
ItJE(~" t"i!lr~ I pI
IS01 GULF BLVD # 807
CLE(~r~:I/oJ!~T[f~ FL
SCHAFFER, GEORGE A
675 S GULFV1[W BLVD I 406
CLEI'll;;VJt1TER I"L~
;5::3767 2(.57
:::::376,7 2903;
.
.
'IJP,ZIO, IFiE:i'iC
I;J{\ZIO" EUGENE
5511 S KOMENSKY ST
CHIC,)(iO IL
:<FI.TY, .Jnr'i[S SF<
1< Fe L. T\":, :3US,~H
3994 r~(.1PII::F;': f-<[I
C,~NTDI..! hI
4e187 4628
60629 4c~.lS
LOVITI, JULIUS L TRE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 501
CLEI~f\INA TEF~ 1"1.
Z;~-)767 2651
F'FiICE, Tlt'i E
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 502
CLE(lFiV.,I,~,T[Fi F"L
~:;2)767
ZEIEr<, I'KiFiBERT Q
lEIER, MARGARET E
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 503
CL.Ei~FI~I;J(JjT[Fi FL
C'l!~H13 IS, !11\!THOH'y'
GARBIS, nNTOINETTE
204 S VINE: 31'
HI r12:0f'II.E I L
~):s}r(:;,7 2666
60.~S21 ~q.O.42
FiO:;;TROM, EFi I K.
SUNDQUIST, ORITTA
:r V(-)Fi f3ERGEPS VAG
43;063 HI r'1D(\:'O:
S\~E[)EN
r'iOf\ELI. I" r'if',RY ICl
675 S GlJLFVIEW BLVD ~ 5()6
CL"E(.,PI;"I(~TCR F'I.
~~::,5-'? is 7
BLAKCLY, .JOSEPH E TRE
BLAKELY, BARBARA TRE
921 V"IOI'\CHESTEi~
FENTON r.1I
I~ 8 <j:3 0
BERKOVSKY, PETER
BERKOVSKY, HELGA
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD I 508
C L" E: r"< r;' 1,,\1 i"1 l' E P F!.
~5 ::~; '76"7 2 (::1 (::.l 6
BARBER, WILLIAM R
BARFiER, BARBARA N
675 GULFVIEW BLVD # GOl
CL..E(\r~lh,I(~TEI'\ FL
32,767 2666
MAHINI, DOROTHEA
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 602
CLE,'~r?l,h,l':lTE:FI 1"'1
:3:S ~/ 6 7" ::? (, I~::I 6
ORGETTAS, MICHAEL TRE
74 CErrrRi>,L ST
PU,\BODY riA
01960 4::.)57
ALBER, VIRGINIA L
675 S GULFVI[W BLVD # 601
CI.E,(\Rli!(lTEF;: FL
::;~576) ? ()(. I.;:.
R(\t'i:::;EY, C:L,~lFl J
HAMSEY, BARBARA M
1406 SAINT GOTTHARO AVE
i~t'1CHOF:~(\Ci[ (.\[<.
CUNNINGHAM, IRENE A TRE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 606
CI.E:(IF,~I,\J('\TI::H I"'L
99.:308 50S2
~::' :.::) '/ 6 '7 :2 (:::, C:. 6
VL(\H08, EL.f1INE
2\2 t1{~PI.E 3T
I,',IEST B!)BYI_ON t"y
11704 7718
CONWAY, E P FAM LTO Pl'NSP
PO EO:>:: :~:~;.=51n
130 (\ ri fJ ,'1 ("I 1'1 0 H
44',0.1.;5
GPGUH I CH , JCJHr-!
GRGURICH, KATICA
5021 W CAPOLL AVE
81\01< I ElL
MISKEL, ELIZABETH V
675 S GULFVII::W BLVD ~ 702
CL..E{~RIt~(~T[P FL
60077
.:::,3767 ::26l1-7
CHAMBERS, LARPY W
CHA,'1BEFIS, (,!Hr~ 1'1
CIO CAPITOL TRAVEL SERV
4929 hONONi~ DF~
,'i(lDI8CJN liil 6'!J }jf:; :J.HJ../
rvi I CH(.IEI. , (IW'.! M
7041 BRIDGETOWN RO
CIHCINt".!(\TI 01-1
'45:?~:{,S 200::,
MORAITIS, CHRIST
675 3 GULFVIEW BLVD # 705
CLE::,"'li,\I,I.I{\ TEoR Fl.
:33767 2647
PANUTH03, PANIAGCJTTn TRr
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 106
CL,[(:IFiI,h,I(\TE:R F'L
::S~5'l' 6"/ 26~:~ 7
.
e
Iq~ITICOS, S ICl 11
KRITICOS, ELIZABETH
151 r1{\NDtC1LI1Y
CLEI'lF~hlllTEFI F;:l~
ZEFELIPPO, MAFlIA R
615 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 70B
CLEI-~\RI,4(lIEP FL
~:53767 142,3
3:.~)7'1.:' 7 264"7
1'!f-1RT I i'~, CiARY 11
MARTIN, BEFlNICE J
LO<~6 f-1FlDEr'~ DR
VILI..Jl HIU.S 1<''1
41017 37'27
KELLER, ELIZABETH M
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 802
CL[flR\,~,(\T[h~ F'L
?;3l67 '2c'~.4)'
OFII..OPP., nt'lITIl 11
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 803
CI..,Et\Fil;.,I!-l TEFl FccL
NAKIS, MICHELINE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 804
C L '" 1'\ I;~ 1,1, (,I E F,~ F" L
c;:.s,767 26A7
:33"767 264-'/"
SGROI,
~3m.w I
'271331
T ARf.)ON
f~ALFJH 0
Li:\UR{l ,]
(:\NDREhIS f3L VD
SF'FHNGS FL.
pnFiP" V I [-.IC[1'.II E.
PliPP LUNE'Y' A
56j~?,; ()(~~{L.{~lr"~D DH
T(lr1Pli fccL.
3:';617 7718
34688 6::;.12
MC DONALD, ROBERT J
r"iC DOt>lnLD, ['1(:'RY
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # BOI
CLEJlRII!A TER FL
CLO\~" CUS I CI<, P
JOHNSON. MARGUERITE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 80B
CI...,[{iFiv,IATE:F~ FL
:~;?)76'/ :267'13
::;~576)'
PUSSO, l<tlREi,J, B
RUSSO, ANTHONY J
615 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 90J
CLEnpWATEFI BEACH FL
C101?DOH" t-10[3L,E L..
3306 SAN DOMINGO Sl
CLE(~RI,Io)(lTFP FL~
337<;:..7
:~) .:5 7' ,i::;. 9 :::; .~5 3 r:~
BARBIERE, MICHAEL J
BELANGER, JILL R
165 BAYOU ST
t1flr~QUETTE t1I
49855 9101
ZHUN. [LLEN M FnMILY TRUST
C/O NASSIF, JANE:]
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1005
CLr:::{lf;~I,I,I(',TER 101...
35"lt,:~7 264':-:.
f3EI'~i'lETT, JOYCE
615 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 90S
CL.Et\RI;'!I'1 TEFl F'I"
VALSAMIDES, GEORGE
VALSAMIDES, GEORGIA
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 906
CLE{'IF~Vi(lTF~P FL
~)5767 2678
.3Z~76'7 2f)IB
BRADLEY, FELICIA N
122 COUNTRY CLUB DR
.](lC/{SONVILLE NC
28546 8142
POL[MENAKOS. SOTIROS
POLEMENAKOS, THEOHARI
352 ATLANTIC nVE
r'il-lRf3LEHE(\I) r'il~
0.194:-::) 2"7:5::2
POY., .JOHt>,! B
ROY" .:rr',NE S
615 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1001
CLE{~Pli,l(iTEFi F'~
P I~~ L L, ::-::;., 1:3 Y F1. [1 i".~ r:)
PALLS, BEATRICE K
:',;206 HOr::OT F)D
TI',i1PI'\ 1"'[..
356.1.81.6.l()
:~)~-)16 7 26 ~r~J
GRACILLA, RANULFO V
GRACILLA, MAPY K
302 CLny FURNACE RD
SH{iFIPSV I LL.F P(l
16150 :~;1()4
HE:NDERSON, NEVETA
EISElEIN, ELIZABETH
675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 1004
CI..,Et\RV'{'ITEFI Fl_
::.~; 25"76"7 2 6,:~i, E:;
NASSIF, FREDERICK J
HASSIF', .]P<t'![T L.
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD W 1005
CLE'~flFiJ,~lt\TEf~ FI..,
DOULAS, GARIFAL.IA
304 HUNTSMILL BLVD
SCARBOPOUGH ON M1W 3C8
C('ir'..!{-~L)r:~
::5$7C~ 7" :264.S
e
e
~SE~LIi'1i>IJ, ISUF
WILLIAMSBRIOGE STATION
PO ElOX 961
Elf~01~;< HY
10467
HAYWOOD, MARGARET R IRE
1150 8TH AVE SW I 70J
L,clPGiO FL~
~:;5770
GOt1EZ" R SCOTT
GOr1EZ, MP,RY L.
2719 OSMUHDBEH PD
!'ir\D I S;OH V.) I
5371,1 5249
MC KERROW, DOHALD C TRE
675 S GUL.FVIEW BLVD ~ 1102
C L. [,::cl HI,.'\I {\TE:',: FL
~:~; :s I 67 2: 6 .:~~, .~)
DOF?11E:fl, ,] fCll'1ES J
DOR1'iEP, DOf~ I S J
675 S GULFVIEW ElLVO I 1103
CLEAPI,"'ATf::R FL
BARBIERE, JOYCE L TRUST
IS::' 13{~\'OIJ SI
1'iAROUETTE 1"1 I
ll9S,C:,S 91.0.1
:~;3767' 2645
LE COi'1PTE., L.EI'I(':
152 HICiHlJ\HD ST
BI.JCi<EY[ i_Af<E OH
~~~300e
SILVERMAN, DIANE
2121 BATHURST ST # 620
IOROHTO ON M5H 2P3
CP,t\'!{)D"'~l
I-ILIDEP" N(l!"'lCY L
278') E3F<JDLE PO
l3L0011F I EL.D 11 I
48;504 1,:',09
LEe, i".U~DYi'J.[ S
908 I."I'::~L..L(;\CE
L[ITCHFIELD hY
42~?'S~:'l
DUDA, NICHOLAS JR
DUDr\, !"i{.\r;:y J
675 GULFVIEW BLVD S . 1201
CLE('tF,~W(:CjTE:P f'L,
HESt'IOPP, COF,:P
675 S GlJlFVIEW BLVD PH 2
CL,E (IF< 1,.\1 (.1 TE:P f"'L.
32:;167 21:"'79
3.?;71::.7 2(~77
FLETCHEP, HAPPIET K TRE
675 S GUL.FVIEW BLVD PH 4
CLE,:,f;llr!i':"TER F"L
~5;57 61 2:6 '77
BLAND CLUB CONDO ASSN IHe
200(:11 GUL.F' BL.VD
INDIAN ROChS BE:ACH FL
3::;::;",1"8,:) 24)'2
I')NTHONY" CP(~lIG 1,',1
AHTHDNY, BARBAPA B
724 BAYWAY BLVD . A-I
CL.r:::i~RV\lf~TEF1 F'L
35761 2611
LAVDAS, DIMITPOS
L~AVD(lS, TH(ClL.IA
724 BAYWAY BLVD H A.
CLE.r:\F'~\^J:::'tTE:Fi FL_
~32:.'l67 :Z(:..'.1..1
CnSEY, Pf)UI_{1 F?
724 BAYWAY BLVD I A-3
CLE{),RWATEFi I:'L
HOUGEN" THERESE V TRUST
724 B{~'i'liJ('f{ BL\lD
CL.[(~Fil,.\I(): TEP FL,
2:;:3;767 2612
~)~;:.7 6,"7
SAUNDERS, WILLIAM R
SAUNDERS, SHIRLEY M
724 BAYWAY BLVD . B-2
C:L.E,'),F1I,"',c\TEf~ f;'L
DETTY, G WILLIAM IPE
IVEPSON. BRITT L
c/O BANK OF AMERICA PRIVATE
PO (30)( 47":)
CL,Ei>,F.,I,'\!(ITEP F'L.3 ,g 7.i 7 u (,{ 71
3~)76 ?
SKTEI_. INC
678 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CLl::{~R"'!~~TER I'~L.
:;::516'7 26(:l2
lEv.) E:iLV'D
FL,
t":
1
. ./
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LoNG RANGE PIANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 2, 2003
Ms. Debra Harris
Northside Engineering Services, Inc,
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
Re: FLD2002-11043, 692 Bayway Boulevard
Dear Ms. Harris:
On January 21,2003, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 11 conditions the above
referenced case, which was a Flexible Development application for attached dwellings with reductions of
the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to
nine feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to
8,1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and reductions of the rear (north) setback
from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C.
Due to Building Code requirements for the stairwell on the west side, your proposal is to shift the entire
building to the east so that the western stairwell now meets the Community Development Code (Code)
and Building Code required setback of 10 feet to the western property line. This necessitates, in order to
maintain setbacks approved by the CDB, the removal of the eastern two parking spaces, while
maintaining a minimum of a 10 feet side (east) setback to the building/stairwell. This reduces the
provided parking to 27 parking spaces, where 23 spaces are required by Code. Additionally, to meet
handicap accessibility requirements, a sidewalk connector has been added from the sidewalk adjacent to
the parking garage/lot to the sidewalk within the public right-of-way.
In accordance with Section 4-406,A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be Minor
Revisions and are approved, These Minor Revisions must be shown on the site plans submitted for
Building Permit BCP2003-03432 prior to the issuance of the building permit.
an que ions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner, at 562-4504.
\IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlInactive or Finished ApplicationslBayway 692 The Islanders - Approved\Bayway 692 Minor
Revisions Letter 9.2.03.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYr HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
. .'
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRnE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LoNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 2, 2003
Ms. Debra Harris
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
Re: FLD2002-11043, 692 Bayway Boulevard
Dear Ms. Harris:
On January 21,2003, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 11 conditions the above
referenced case, which was a Flexible Development application for attached dwellings with reductions of
the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to
nine feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9,5 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to
8,1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and reductions of the rear (north) setback
from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C.
Due to Building Code requirements for the stairwell on the west side, your proposal is to shift the entire
building to the east so that the western stairwell now meets the Community Development Code (Code)
and Building Code required setback of 10 feet to the western property line. This necessitates, in order to
maintain setbacks approved by the CDB, the removal of the eastern two parking spaces, while
maintaining a minimum of a 10 feet side (east) setback to the building/stairwell. This reduces the
provided parking to 27 parking spaces, where 23 spaces are required by Code, Additionally, to meet
handicap accessibility requirements, a sidewalk connector has been added from the sidewalk adjacent to
the parking garage/lot to the sidewalk within the public right-of-way.
In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be Minor
Revisions and are approved. These Minor Revisions must be shown on the site plans submitted for
Building Permit BCP2003-03432 prior to the issuance of the building permit.
an que ions, feel free to contact Wayne M, Wells, AICP, Senior Planner, at 562-4504.
l~
\\MS5cIPDSIP/anning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlInactive or Finished ApplicationslBayway 692 Tne Islanders - ApprovedlBayway 692 Minor
Revisions Letter 9.2.03.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
of
January 28, 2003
Ghovaee - Page Two
3. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums;
4. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording
warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
5, That covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an
administrative level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
6. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building
permits;
7. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
8. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
9. That all storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits;
10. That the dumpster enclosure meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Department prior to
the issuance of building permits; and
11. That the landscape plan be modified to clarify planting areas, improve side yard
landscaping/buffering and clarify the preservation or removal of existing trees.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (January 21, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall
be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of
time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect
of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case
expires on February 4,2003,
January 28,2003
Ghovaee - Page Three
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.clearwater-fl.com.
Very truly yours,
~~
Cynthia Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
IIMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFLEXlInactive or Finished Applications\Bayway 692 The Islanders - Approved\Bayway 692
Development Order. doc
06/23/2003 14: 15 7275.,6 PLAfo,j..
03-260604 JUN-25-2003 1 1 : 22AM KARLEEN F. DE ~L~ OF COI.RT
P INELLAS CO 8K 12847 PG 732 PINELLAS COOOV, FLORIDA (727) 464-3OOB
e I 111111 11111 11111 11111 11m 11111 1mI11111 1111 1111 ------------------------
2C206256 06-25-2003 11:22:07 WJB
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 51 DeL-ISLAND KEV DEWWJIJ LLC/LVOOS
100 SO. MYRTLE AVE., ~ FLOOR, CI.EARWATER. FL 33756 000006
PHONE: 582-4587: FAX: !82-48G5 IU:03260604 BK:12B47 SPG:0732 EPG:0732
I\'ECORDING 001 PAGES 1 $6.00
(fFICIAL COPIES 5 $1.00
DECLAllA.TION OF UNlIT OF TITLE CERTIFCATION 6 $1.00
PropertyOwncr: =ts/~V) v'~/))E'() ~. L....LC, TOTrt:
Propclrty Addtest: (? q;;;;.. /?'R-Y I J. 'a-v 13.Jd.C.J/)) F(, CHECK AMT. TENDERED: ::~
. ( IlIAHGE: $. 00
.KNOW OF ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that pUl'lUlDt to the ordinancldVof-Qae..CjtJU'C~
pcrtIininc to the jsauanc. of building permits en4 reguJatingllll4 deveJopmmlt acti:Yiticl, the undarsipecl, beinJ
the fee DWnIr (I) of the foUowinl desoribed rea1 propc:rtY sit\lated in the City of C~tcr, Coymy of Plnellll/C
mdStateofFlorida,towit. ~G..rf.f.\ ~'S'. 1"1/2..' IIS/O'SOb~/OOI}02-,t;J + l'"//~)tS'/oso()+/OQI/02.~O
L\\$ '2-\ '2..2.. ~ 2..'1 ~ClC.\<.. AI ~~:i~le. -;..\,.,....'4\...... }to. S, M r-C.C.Or-4Q,d \..... ~\(I,>r
~u'" ~~.. :!.l&', l'..""~c. Hl"o..~t .~ 1"\M\\M ~-''''', 'f'\,,.~~....
do hereby the followm, dccl8tlltion of conditions. llmitatillDl and rQStrictions 011 -.id landa, berea1'lef to be
):noWl1I1ld tllfcrted to as a DECLARATION OF UN1'lY OF Tn'LE. u to thD foUowinS particulln:
1. That thcI aforeaid plot or combination of ICparat.e loti, plotl, pccell, ~ at portions thereot: shall
~ be rcprded as and is hmby declared to be unified under OIIC title as III. indivisible 'building
litlll-
2. That the said property shall beDceforth be COIIIIidered II one plot or parcel of IIDd. and that no portico
thereof aha1l be told, ..iJll<<l, tnnsfcmd, oonveyed or deYitcd ~Iy except in its entirety, as one
. plot Ill' pucet of1md.
3. That Ibia DceJaration of Unity of Title Khan COI15titute 8 l:OVCD&t1t to run with thlland, as provided by
law.lII1d sball be bindina upon the undersigned. and the hein. IUcoesllOltll1ld UJip of the Wldmiped,
IIld all panieI claiminS Wlda: them Wltil IlUClh tin:K as the same may be released in writi1\g \lIldel' the
order of thI::i City ~p of the City of Clearwater. The undersiaDed also *gree{K) that IhiI i1utr1Iment
IhaU be ~ il1 the public mords ofPinellas CoWlty, Florida.
Si,aDed. Raled, witnessed md acknowledged this d q ~ day of --... ryUf.I\~ . 20 ~
at C1euwater, Florida.
u ~ c --;:s; ~CJ\ V"I
O~~
. ~t
Y2ebqff-.r- . [Y'Mf /Ivt'€f,q~.
STATE OF J'LO
COtlNIY OJ'
BEFOREMEpmoIl&1lyappeaRd. ~D8C.f-T E ky()}...IS and
. to me known to be tho person(s) described in ellCl:ution thereof to be
his. ber or their free act IIIld deed for the uses and JNI'PClICI herein mentiOAe<l.
WITNESS my 1umd and official SQ] this CJ.1- .J./~ day of CJ Li. ~. 20 ().3 ,
i/. -
,iCCI # Q) ,.,_~ xf {V\.C( ~(d JlR.AJ'
Re.~'<'-'V\ ~ / g~1i1f _My CommiIIion BXpires:
S1~ FClftIIII\lIIIt)oI1iIleDoeellllldlll'l1ClO1 _ kf~ NOTARY PUBLIC
,reC !,j:-- State of Florida
C;::;~UJ e.s+ Cb V\ s-f-('v Co- + io 4DR219 -~ TtlERESA S. CHANDLER
[\ , , I ~N~T 0/ (~ My commission no. DO 130260
,-'0 ~x:. I ~31 ~ Iv~ My commission expires July 27,2008,
MTF 1~
L..~VO-o r(. 3377~ ~t ~
renAL .t>.::.~)-13
.." ".AiI:. ur r~\JHIi)h"INf::U.f\SCqUN:rV
,..tII1T cl~'l I hereby certify thaI tl1e foregOing IS
(JJ";.~.,.,.,...'.~,.ltt ~ frue copy as. tt1e.. appears among ......::<
t/ . \., tnefh~oor so hiS: rt. \JJ
; [ \?(C'~ Th,s ~!JAv "f ,20--",.
".: '. '" Kp.AL.:EN f BLAKER
>(~.,. /~ Cia f ilCOUrl
'.,COO~:.--
""....,....
, Deputy Clerk
_._,~