FLD2002-11041 - PLT2002-11004
.
-,
CASE #: fL~ t-~ . II
DATE RECEIVED: II . z. { . (1 ?~
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): """
ATLAS PAGE #: Z~S J\
ZONING DISTRICT: ,
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: il~fl
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES: C ~
NORTH: J.(4J "1,,...... f
SOUTH: T
WEST: r.
EAST: f
o
:>-
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ '2.05
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive IBml Redevelopment Project (Revised 11/05/02) ie.: IE
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-use additional sheets as necessary
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
BA'I'NAY
T~rJ Mo....eS
,
a........C!.. .
MAILING ADDRESS: I ~g BA."t'S\Oe:: p,;e,\J& I c.....t..c) BEAC.'" J F.... 337'7
E-MAIL ADDRESS: R,JRoc;e~Sl~(GJ)AoL.CXftHONENUMBER: (7Z.7~ 5.2- o~e
CELL NUMBER: (72.-') SIZ-04C;8 FAX NUMBER: (zZ7) 78~- ZQa2..
PROPERTYOWNER(S): (;U.!i. n: ':'100""'''' (4-4-q - Q37'7)
(Must include AlL owners)
AGENTNAME(S): lloc.EIlS B&:"'"",,~ DmJ~u.~P"~ ROLAodO ~~
MAILING ADDRESS: p.o. BoX (/;,7(. e~..,.s.TAL 8EACoM, F L. 3 J
II>
E-MAIL ADDRESS: R-J~b~~.se AO.....t"'.-.. PHONE NUMBER: (7'2.7) 5'2.-04'-8
CELL NUMBER: (727) $", Z - o+~a FAX NUMBER: (7 z. T) 7 Sq - Z. q 8~
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS of subject site: ';;':S {;,. RA V'tAJA.V B L\I 0 , ~ LW B "A. e '"
&.dT S I ~, I" . ,.., ., I 6 I B a.oc.l::. A, BAYS loe I: 0" 0 '\1l.r,~ 1I0 s:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: , p~ to.
PARCEL NUMBER:
PARCEL SIZE:
.(1,,7 AGeE
Zq.lZl'- S.F
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: (II) SII\JClB FAf4''-''t TO~ ~O"'as - 3,'&0 SF ~.
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
R~ S eT6
S 9<<J>E V'4~O
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOU APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT. OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
~ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY. DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6) Ai EX r P4C e
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
~vide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain bm'! each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
S E l:::
A I \ AC \-t
A- I
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
SEE
A.\ I ~ C.I,-\ A-7
rne' DO C'_~
If\JFC.
7provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
~ each criteria is achieved in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
I' fl .~
'l.'
.\
L lw 02-33l251SFT-S;'20'
.F> INEL,L.FlS, Ct!. '.BK U!ao
. .MSlNS "MENT "'PAAEDBY:~.=:'
KarlM~ ebmi~,III;P~A.
Karl M. ~hmitZ, m. pA ,
12000N. Dale Mabry Hwy, Ste HO
Tampa, 33MB
PilIperty A~praisers PBrcell,dentificalion (Folio) Numbers:
17/29/15/05004/001/0150
.
':1'-
.
I'
. I ' .1.
KAFmN~. f BLAKER, CLE~.K OF COURT
. F'IlUL~ cO tlTY, flORIDA '. :
.. .'.
, .
.4_____..____ __...________..,._~________
r
I
; 9l!20 190 0 05:- 2002 17~14 :54 Bm.
51 DED~DI 'IOlJAflNI PARTNERS'
0031?l ' ,
!n:02331251BK:12203 Sf'G:2210 EF.'G:2210
PEai~'U1NG 0 1 fAliES '$(,.00
nct/'; STAMP -: DR2l'i $5,635.00
SPACE ABOVE THIS lI1'E'FO
Eeo
TOTAL:
elf ~MT. TENDERED:
CI1ANGE:
BV _ .. . ... DEPlIT'1 CLERK
1
$5,t,41.00
$5.1.41.00
..or,
ING DATA
THIS WARRANTY DEED, made the 41h day ofSeplem e ..20 by Clearwater Hl!spllalily, Inc., a Florida
corporuliol!. herein 'called the grantor. to DiGiovanni Partners B ywa If..LC, a Florida limited liability company
as to. an un~lvided thirty live percent (35%) interest, whose os om. I pddress is 163 Bayslde Drive, Clearwater
Beach, Florida 33767, hereinafter called the Grantee: ;
OVherever u.sed herein the terms "gran/or" and ''gran/t'e'' include at flit.' i
represe1l1iJlivfS ulld assigns of indh'iJuuls. iJlld the successor.1i and assigl corp,
WIT N E SSE T H: That the grantor, for and in eonsideratio I thel
and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby c owl~
re~i.ses, rcleases, conveys and confinns unto the grantee all ilia c rtain
Flonda. VIZ.:
Lots IS, 16, 17. and 18, Block A, Bayslde Subdivision . 5, ac rdlng 10 the mop or -plat thereof as
recorded In Plat Book 38. Page 38 of the Public Re;:ords of I cllas ounty, Florida.
this irlsfrumem and ~/u: heirs. legal
('
ofTEN AND OOtlOO'S ($10.00) Dollars
ed, hereby grants, bargains, sells. aliens,
nd situate in PINEL LAS County. Slate of
TOGETHER, with all the tenements, hereditaments amI appurtenances Iher to belong ,"g or in anywise appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever.
AND, the grantor hen:by covenants with said grantee that the granlor is I'
Ihc grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said I
and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons wh
encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequcnt to December 31, 200 I .
fullY seiZl:C of said land in fee simple: thai
. and herehy ,varrants the title to said land
oever: "nd that said land is free of all
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
P/;r~s J._
ACCT., /
RE~' ~O"AK abl.Presl
OR2'9 '::>J L'
OS ..___ 107 orado Cou
INT ._. ..,
r~T~ ____
l',.,.r _____
p:C __._..
~1EV ___
'TOTA~UU I
CK BAL___
CHGAMT _ I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said grantor has signed and sealed these p 'ents the day and year first above wrillen.
Signed, sealed and delivered in the presencc of:
I
SEAL
~ Karl M SC\Ul1IlZ III
!" ~ . . ConmisSion DD104848
'=....;1 F Juno Ol.lllOB
I
i
I
!
I
!
SJptember, 2-102 by AK Bahl, Presidcnt of
~llion. HetS .::' is personally known to me or
i' .
I
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 4th day Q
Clearwater Hospitality. Inc., a Florida corporation on behalf of the co
has produced /':< I... 17,- as identificalion.
My Commission Expires:
.
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements. )
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
SEE
A \ iAc.H
A. - \
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
SE"E
AI
F (") 112
J AL- ~ A
o CJ c:::::. k::.
Z
',,"1FO
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
/SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
a TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed); ( "1) FA t.ttS
~LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the
M' A submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
l' accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
~GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
rtt' PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
a COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
Ai/A
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
-L All dimensions;
;/' North arrow;
7 Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
"7 Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; ,0, ,.....2. sttov,.}o ~L-ODoC.,
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; T61'" A '- 4 0 . q. e 0 ~ 1=.
All required setbacks; , to, 7 40 'Z. S ~ f:, f! 0 u IWO. F L.
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements; 11/4
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces; 11/4
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks
L
~
./
JL
44
,/
--;;7
7
.,/
~
.",..
,/
AIl~
~"
-.L
a SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabularform:
0/' Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
.!L Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
.~ Gross floor area devoted to each use; 3,680
zz.. Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
__ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
_ Size and species of all landscape material;
&!/II Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
~ Building and structure heights;
~ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
~~ Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses
~DUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) and color rendering if possible
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
AJ-LA One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees
I
.
.
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
~
V'
~
.,/
17
..L
L
..L
./
./
,/
"7
B""
~
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible)
Q ~A: COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications)
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21)
~
5
z
~
STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal stonn systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
Q COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Pennit), if applicable
o wfiJ COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
I. BUilDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
~UILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials
~EDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required
J. ~,~GE: (Division 19. SIGNS' Section 3-1806)
C All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
C All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
) Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
~ Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
.
.
l. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
DI (f,lovA,.J rJl
P A. ,e-r IV ::::""/.2 .-.;
1- .T. O.
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
L..o-r s
IS' . I", n ~ LS . 0 ~CIC.
. ,
A
OI9-YSn? /!if
.& vA - 0 I VJ oS /C.l1..1
PLAr
~OOJc
.3A
A-NP .gl:f.
p" N 8,-,-, "9.s-
co,
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
(II)
1.1 N, r
7'd IAJ~
1-10'-' S e-~
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
1(0 ll}"'1 ci j( 0 J ofZf
~
;0 A r;t!!.,C ",9
.,...,
c:: r-n U c:: H-
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
'\
6.
That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing i~ true and correct. ~
.?C:~
PropertrOwner pr
---.
-
/
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
,jefore me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the St
oV , ~() z-personally appeared 0
Deposes and says that he/she fully understa
JEFFRET IZZO
My Comm Exp. 11114105
No. DO 06e817
II Personally ~ (I 0lhIr 1.0.
My Commission Ex/ri" "-f
S:\Pfanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldeve/opment reviewlflexible standard application 2. doc
i--.'3S)e:J ui ,J neXIi)k:
,_, r\~.ijJilCdlii);;
Q( l.'ri:~Jrw alei
.
.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
l. SIGNATURE:
tZ 1/; ~~~ -
Signature" of property owner or representative
r
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS A""~
Swom to and subscribed before me this ~ day of
to me and/or by
personally known has
as
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
-
---
rn. JEn>{[t IZZO
.<:~ 11/14/05
~-... ,.\My eomm Up.
No. DO 066817
\WIi'fII II ()IIlIf I.D.
11~
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
r
I
'} ..
I
I
I
L ! 'if 02~331.251 SPT- 5;'20
~ ~INE~~AS,CO SK 1220
IYlmUUUWU1III1lIII1lI11
THIS INS UMENT PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
Karl M. chmi~, III. P.A.
Karl M. chmitz, ill, PA .
12000 N, Dale Mabry Hwy, Ste HO
Tampa, Ff. 33618
Property Appraisers Parcell.dentification (Folio) Numbers:
17/29/15/05004/00110150
$5,b41.00
$5.i,41.no
$.orl
i'
i.
."
I
KAFmN F. ',,' E BLAKER, CLE~j( OFCOIJRl
f'ItHLAS CO 111'/. FLO~:IDA .
~-----'-"':"":-. ---c--~~c--. -.....-. .,.-~. ----.-.;....;.-.
.9Ll201BO o. -O~2002 i?:14:54 WN
51 DED-DI .IQI)ANtH PARTNERS' .
0031?l .
!n:~.23312511 BK:12203 SPG:2210 EPG. :2210
fiECOfiDINGOpl frAGES 1 $(..00
no~ STAMP - DR2l'; 3 $5.1.35.00
I
. !
,
!
TOTAL:
Clfr.' AMT, TENDE~'ED:
~ CHANGE:
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FO ECO: ',NG DATA r~Y DEf'IJT'1 CLE~'Y
,
I
THIS W ARI~ANTY DEED, made the 4/h day ofSep/em e ,20q ,by Clearwa/er Hqspitalily, Inc.. a Florida
corpora/lOll, herein called the grantor, to DiGiovanni Partners B' ywa)' ,I-LC, a Florida limited liability eompany
as /0 an un~ivlded thirty five percent (35%) interest, whose os offi~, ~ddress is 163 Bayslde Drive, Clearwater
Beach, Flot1ida 33767, hereinafter called the Grantee: I L
(Whereverllfed herem Ihe terms "grall/or" alld "gralllee" Inc/ude .1 III<':#'II"S 10 this I/I.<trumelll ./ld /he heirs. legal
::e:':I':: :,:a;/::S ::td::'::~::~:: .:::e;:(:::::::::~~~ UYfC:::l"lttIO:~ TEN AND 00/1 OO'S ($10.00) Dollars
and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby c lowl ed, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens,
remises, releases, conveys and conlinns unto the grantee all tha c nain nd situate in PINELLAS County, State of
Florida, viz.:
Lots IS, 16, 17, and 18, Block A, Bayside Subdivision ,Is, ac rdlng!o the Dlap or 'plat thereof as
reeorded In Pial Book 38, Page 38 of the Public Records of i~ellas ounly, Florida,
TOGETHER, with all the tenements, hereditaments and appunenances ther to belong .r:g or in anywise appertaining.
TO HA VE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever.
AND, the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that.the grantor is I'
the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said la
and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons wh
encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 200 I .
fullY sciz"c of said land in fee simple; that
. and hereby warrants the title to said land
oever; ~~d that said land is free of all
IN WITI'ESS WHEREOF, the said grantor has signed and sealed these p senls the day and year first above written.
J",,,,,"
F4 ida co
FtF~S J.. !
ACeT. . . /
RE~. ~O"AK ahl,Presi
DR219 ';u \" .
I) S.____ I 07 ~oradO (ou
INT ._
Ft:[f. ___ _
~,~i f ___~___
p:C ___...
tiEV ____
Signed, oealed and delivered in the presence of:
J
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
T6TA~UO I
CK BAL --- I
CHGAMi _ i
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 4th day Q
Clcatwaler Hospitality, Inc., a Florida corporation on behalf of the co
has produced t= L.. ,,~ as identification.
I
S~ptember, 2i)02 by AK Bahl, President of
ration. He/S.1..' is personally known to me or
SEAL
My Commission Expires:
1/) I(arlMSchmilz 111
. . . Commisaion 00104946
\;",..:1 F June 01, 2008
I
I
!
File No,: K207103A
I
i J'<1
1 .
I j I
I':~'
~
~
I
~
.
.
........
IIIIII ~atti ~be ~rcbited, ~n(.
-:=-
December 19,2002
Mark Parry
City of Clearwater
Development Review Services
.J
:.:n
RE: 656 Bayway
Bayway Townhomes
DEe 2 0 2002
t_ <
Dear Mark,
Attached are (15) sets of all revised required documents.
In speaking with Leslie Dougalside, of the city attorney's office, she stated that
the city would accept a copy of the "Corporate Resolution" as verification of Gus
Digiovanni as having the authority to sign on behalf of all involved partners of
Bayway Townhomes, LLC. We will bring this document to the city as soon as
the attorney returns from his holiday, along with a new signature page of the
application.
This information will be submitted well in advance of the COB Meeting. We hope
this is acceptable to your office.
Thank you for all your assistance in getting this project together.
Should you have any questions or need further information, do not hesitate to
call.
Patricia M. Stough, AlA
PMS/aws
CC: Gus Digiovanni
1634SAN Roy DRIVE · DUNEDIN, FL34698. 727-733-3769. AAC002103
.
e
........
DEe 2 0 2002
111111
-=-
Bayway Townhomes
656 Bayway Blvd.
flatti ~be ~rcbtted, 3!nc.
A T"1"'~c.'" "'" e;ur A - I
Written submittal per Section 3-913.A
General Criteria
The Proposed Construction of a new (3) Story, (Ground floor enclosed Garages with 2 stories
living above) will be compatible with the scale and bulk of the adjacent and surrounding
properties. Although adjacent to the subject property is a Condominium project, "Bayway
Shores" which is (3) stories above parking; The North side of Bayway Blvd consists of Tourist,
Le. low scale motel buildings. The majority of which are non conforming FEMA buildings built
in the early 60's and 70's. The land coverage requested is consistent with and In many cases
less than that of the existing structures. To-r~,- SI,..OG s.f."':: ~O, 4tC;o s. F.
The demolition of the existing Howard Johnson's building (10,642 SF) and the construction of
new Mediterranean Architectural Style buildings (12,732 SF)with Tropical and consciously
designed landscaping, and brick pavers with concrete hard-scape in lieu of asphalt will
Increase not only the value of the proposed project but also the values of surrounding
properties when appraised In the future.
The health safety and welfare of those residing or working the neighborhood will not be
adversely affected by the residential use of these new buildings as the current use of motel
generates more traffic and transient personnel, the stability of single family ownership may
well be an asset to the neighborhood and the Beach community. The elimination of the 25
existing asphalt parking spaces that back into the ROW of Bayway will further enhance the
Safety of the neighborhood.
The minimization of traffic Impact is realized by the change In occupancy from Motel to
single family. The Institute of Traffic Engineer data substantiates the decrease in the number
of daily trips made to and from each parcel. The one way access drive (15"-0" wide) has
been reviewed by the Traffic Engineering department. The consensus was that the due to
the angular building fa<;ade, the one way configuration was not objectionable, plus the
decrease in pavement width, will Increase the Front yard landscaping.
The existing signage will be removed. No new project signage will be provided, in an effort
to introduce an upscale residential project consistent with the Clearwater Beach by Design
Program.
The proposed Townhome development will enhance the visual character of the
neighborhood, increase surrounding property values and not be negative relative to
acoustics and olfactory other than what the usual single family stereo and barbecue grill
would provide. The visual character is in keeping with the color palette contained within the
Beach by Design Guide lines.. The Building use as Quality Single Family Residences (Town
Houses) will not only be an asset to the Bayway Blvd Community, in keeping with the
General applicable criteria of the Clearwater Code, but also is recommended within Beach
--.'.:.. ;,!".
.
.
.-..
IIIIII f)atti ijCbe ~rcbitect, ]fuc.
-=-
COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA
The redevelopment of the parcel without the decrease in front, side, and rear yard setbacks
would render the cost feasibility of the project (that is the land purchase and the
construction of upscale 1/2 million dollar purchase price units) undo-able.
Many of the existing motels properties on the north side of Bayway currently enjoy
5' -0" building side yard setbacks, continuous asphalt pavement with back onto the street
parking, and rear dock (deck) promenades that are built onto and over the seawall.
Front yards are virtually non existent due to the "back onto the street" parking.
The requested front setback (5'-0") is applicable to the drive pavement not the building (30'.
0").
The requested 6'_0" side yard setback is further reduced at 12 feet above grade to 4'.2" due
to the bay window extension.
The rear setback is relative to the wood Promenade (0'-0"). Current on site conditions
include pavement and walks that are adjacent to the exist seawall. The existing building
rear setback is 6.7'. The new building rear construction line of 27' -10" will be a major
improvement over the existing conditions. Current construction is only 6.5" from the property
line.
The use of the property as Townhomes Is not only consistent with the City of Clearwater
Code of Ordinances, but is encouraged by the Beach by Design Document. Truly this
project is in the best interest of the future owners and also the neighborhoods of the Beach
Community.
The compatibly of Single Family residences with the adjacent Motel uses is best understood
when taking into consideration the long lease tenants of some of the local "mom and pop"
motels. And of course totally compatible with existing Bayway Shores Condominium project
on the west property line. There is no mix of use "within" this project, other than the boat
docks,
The upgrade financially, esthetically, and with regard to the health safety and welfare of not
only the adjacent property owners but the City as a whole is evidenced by the Architectural
quality of the buildings, the introduction of fire sprinklers within and the additional fire hydrant
at the dock. The current Market value of the property (according to the County Appraisers
office is $1,970,000.. The units Will be sold for approximately $650,000 each (a new total
property value of $ 7, 150,000). Hopefully enhancing the neighboring property values.
The off street parking for this project is being provided by enclosed (2 car) garages below all
the (11'1 future residences, The individual access drives of 25'.0" wil! provide space for
,-_j '_,_ 'J k"_ U J ; ',j ,_" ~~:' ,- i...;
.
.
IIIIII llatti m;be ~rtbited, ]JUt.
-=-
allow for ease of access to each unit. This situation is a great improvement over the existing
parking/back-out spaces that are on the city right of way. Due to this on site drive, the front
yard setback is diminished to only 5' -0" as opposed to the required 15'.
SETBACKS
We are seeking to utilize the flexible design criteria of a 6'-O"(Building) side yard setback, 5'-
0" (pavement) front yard setback and a 0' -0" rear Promenade setback We trust that staff
and the Board will appreciate this request in light of the opportunity to enhance the
neighbor hood with a Ilnew buldlng" project in keeping with the recommendations of the
guidelines of "beach by Design" , specifically mid rise townhomes compatible with the
residential condominiums next door.
Further, the mlnimalism of this request Is realized when looking at the existing Howard
Johnson's building front setback of 20'-0"(east end), and east side yard of 4.87'. In
contrast, the proposed townhomes building front set back Is 30-0" with a 6'-0" side yard
setback. Less than that of the buildings on site today.
The rear setback requested is 0' -0", due to the Wood promenade and concrete pool deck
(5' -a") adjacent to the seawall, providing access to the docks. The building superstructure
rear setack Is 27.89' well beyond the required 20'-0".
Upon initial financial feasibility studies a project of 11 townhomes would provide for the best
comfort level for the lending institutions and construction cost return The reduction in side
yard setback will allow units of a reasonable interior width of 19' -4"
The additional drive within the front yards will allow for safety in the ingress and egress to the
new townhomes .
In light of the waterway and natural vista to the north the reduction In rear yard for the pool
and promenade will not be an annoyance to any rear property owners.
BUILDING DESIGN
The Bayway Townhomes are a continuation of work begun on Brightwater (currently under
construction) and similar to the Mooring Townhomes also being reviewed at this time. These
are all a terrific opportunity for the City of Clearwater to take yet another small step towards
the realization of the guidelines outlined in the Beach By Design Document.
These Townhomes will also be Mediterranean in character predominately 35'0" (mean roof
height) tall. The Introduction of elevator rooftop access places the peak of the elevator
enclosure at approx. 42' -6". The building Is rectilinear in shape with a "saw tooth" fa<;ade
offset in 3'-8" increments. Front Balusters and recesses add to the shade and shadow of the
front elevation. The Design, scale and mass of the building superstructure is well within
"nlFlntifiable orchitechJro!" standards of Beach bv Design
'.J ,"J ...._.
, j '- '.'
v'-,
.
.
..-..
IIIIII J)atti tJrbe ~rcbited, llnc.
-=-
The huma"n scale of the street front and building/ground Interface are realized through the
introduction of individual garage doors and low scale (8 '0" AFF) tile roofs. The Individual
driveways will have brick paver accents and be of concrete construction as opposed to
asphalt, further Indicating the quality of the total building project.
The materials of the building will consist of Grade level concrete block with a Putty White
Color stucco finish. White Doric Columns and accents of Red Mahogany Architectural trim
will be introduced as linear elements at the intersection of the concrete block stucco first
floor gcirage area and the CBS 2nd and 3rd floors. The 2nd and 3rd stories will be a Butter Beige
stucco color. A deep Mahogany Red trim accent color will be introduced through the use of
paint on the balcony beams and door surrounds .AII railings will be White Aluminum. The
concrete Barrel tile roof will consist of a "Florida" Blend Monier glazed Roofing Tile (or equal)
adding a unique color combination.
As stated earlier the irregular fa<;ade of the building will not only allow for a delineation of
the individual units but also provide for shadow and contrast on the building face. The
exterior angulation (10 degree off square with the property line) will further enhance the
street fa<;ade bringing interest, utility and fa<;ade offsets.
Due to the unique location of the new town homes and the superb view I The roof tops will
be designed to allow for access from the second floor balcony via a spiral stair. The roof top
will also have landscape areas for fichus trees and other plantings. These plantings will also
enhance the front and rear elevations of the building.
1634 SAN ROY DRIVE · DUNEDIN. FL 34698. 727-733-3769. AA C0021 03
.
.
BAYWAY TOWNHOMES
656 BAYWAY BOULEVARD
CLEARWATER BEACH, Fl
12/18/02
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA
= 0.45 Ac.
PROVIDE DETENTION FOR FIRST %" INCH OF RUNOFF
Q
=
0.45 X 0.75/12 X 43,560
= 1,225 C.F.
STAGE/STORAGE RELATIONSHIP - DETENTION POND
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
279
679
1111
1575
STORAGE AVAILABLE
(C.F.)
o
240
695
1391
STAGE
(EL.)
SURFACE AREA
(S.F.)
REQUIRED STORAGE EL. (WEIR SLOT INV.)
= 6.88 (SEE PLAN FOR DETAIL)
NOTE: ABOVE CALCULATIONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS PRELIMINARY ONLY AND ARE
SUBJECT TO REVISION PENDING RECEIPT OF TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.
Woods Conslting
.
Environmental Permitting Marine Engineering Land Planning
322 Ridge Road
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
ATTACHMENT A
PROPOSED BAYWAY TOWNHOMES MULTI-USE DOCKS
COMMERCIAL DOCK CRITERIA
SECTION 3-601C.3.(a) through (g)
(a) Use and Compatibility
The docks will be for the sole use of the occupants of the 11 unit town home community located at 656
Bayway Boulevard. As noted in item 11 of the enclosed Fact Sheet (Attachment B), the proposed
townhomes are consistent with the Beach by Design guidelines adopted February 15, 2001 by the City.
The proposed dock is consistent with docks in the general area. The proposed dock structure extends
approximately 56.4 feet from the seawall. The docks located approximately 1,100 feet to the west (at 445
Hamden Drive) and the docks located approximately 1,000 feet to the east (830/850 Bayway) extend
approximately 100 feet or more from the seawall. The docking facilities immediately adjacent to the site
extend lesser distances from the seawall. However, as discussed in (d) below, the proposed docks are
located further from the seawall than adjacent docks in order to avoid any impacts to seagrasses that exist
along the shoreline on the eastern side of the site. Please see Attachment D.
It should be noted that the construction of upgraded docking facilities to accommodate larger boats is
consistent with ongoing redevelopment on Clearwater Beach which includes the construction of upscale
three and four level townhomes, as envisioned and encouraged by the Beach by Design guidelines.
Purchasers of such upscale residences expect to have upgraded amenities such as larger wet slips for
their boats.
Due to the redevelopment the area is undergoing, the dock patterns in the general vicinity of this site will
undergo change in the future. A new, upgraded pattern of docking facilities will replace the old.
(b) Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities
The dock is designed so as to not create any adverse impact on persons using the adjacent waterways for
recreational or commercial purposes. As discussed under item 3 in the Fact Sheet (Attachment B), the
dock is set back from the property to the west 32.7' as compared to a required setback of approximately
24.6'. The setback on the east is 30.7' as compared to the required setback of 24.6'. Also, as shown on
the aerial view with the dock superimposed (Attachment C), the use of the proposed slips will not impact
the users of the boats slips located on the properties immediately adjacent on the west and east.
c) Impacts to Navigation
The dock as proposed should have no detrimental impact on users of the adjacent waters. See item 7 of
the Fact Sheet (Attachment B) wherein it is noted that the dock structure extends only 56.4' from the
shoreline as compared to the waterway width at this location which varies from approximately 670' to 748',
averaging approximately 725'.
Office: (727) 786-5747 Fax: (727) 786-7479 Email: billwoods@woodsconsulting.org
.
.
7. Width of Waterway:
The width of the waterway at the location of the proposed dock as measured perpendicular to the
shoreline varies from 670' to 748', but averages 725'. The dock structure, extending 56.4' from the
shoreline, represents a maximum of 8.4% of the waterway width, which is well less than the criteria
of 25% of the waterway width. Please see Attachment D.
8. Docks being Removed:
One existing dock is being removed which represents the removal of 376 square feet of existing
dockage.
9. Bathymetric Survey
The survey finn of E. T. Caudell & Associates perfonned the bathymetric survey and also delineated
the area where seagrass is located. As the docks are designed so as to not impact the existing
seagrasses, no further seagrass studies were perfonned.
10. Portion of Dock Adjacent to Seagrass Area is Handrailed
The walkout (both sides) and the entire south side of the T-head dock will be equipped with 42"
handrail. The presence of the handrail on the south side of the T-head will preclude mooring of
boats along this portion of the dock and thus avoid impacts to the existing seagrasses.
11. Beach by Design:
The proposed townhomes are consistent with the Beach by Design guidelines adopted February
15,2001 by the City. Specifically, as shown on Figure 3 of the Beach by Design report, the area
encompassed by Bayway Boulevard is noted as an area for "strategic revitalization and renovation."
The purchasers of waterfront townhomes of the nature proposed for this site expect to have
amenities such as wet slips for their boats.
.
Woods. Consulting
.
Environmental Permitting Marine Engineering Land Planning
322 Ridge Road
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
ATTACHMENT B
PROPOSED BAYWAY TOWNHOMES MULTI-USE DOCKS
FACT SHEET
AND
DIMENSIONAL CRITERIA
SECTION 3-601C.3.(h)
1. Proposed Use:
The proposed use is a multi-use dock to provide 10 slips for residents of the proposed 11 zero lot
line townhomes. The slips are 15.5 feet clear span by 33 feet in length.
2. Property Width:
The property width measured at the shoreline is 245.9' (MOL).
3. Setbacks:
. The adjacent property to the west is multi-family with existing boat slips. The required
setback on the west is 10% of the property width as measured at the shoreline or 24.6'.
Actual setback as proposed is 32.7'
The property to the east is zoned Tourist and is currently under review as a Flexible
Development by the City of Clearwater for a 6 unit townhome development. Boat slips are
existing on this property. The setback on the east should be a minimum of 10% of the
property width as measured at the shoreline or 24.6'. Actual setback as proposed is 30.7'
4. Length:
The dock extends 56.4' from the seawall which is less than 75% of the width of the property as
measured at the shoreline or 184.5. The outermost tie piles extend 69.3' from the seawall.
5. Width:
The proposed width of the structure is 182.5' which is less than 75% of the width of the property as
measured at the shoreline or 184.5',
6. Area:
The area of the proposed dock is 1,422.5 square feet.
Office: (727) 786-5747 Fax: (727) 786-7479 Email: billwoods@woodsconsulting.org
.
.
(d) Impacts on Marine Environment
As noted by examination of the plans, the dock has been designed and sited to avoid any impacts to the
existing seagrasses. Please see items 9 and 10 on the Fact Sheet enclosed as Attachment B.
(e) Impacts on Water Quality
As noted on the plans, the depth of water in the area where boats will berth is a minimum of approximately
7.0 to 10.0 feet at mean low water. This provides well in excess of one foot of clearance between the
lowest member of a vessel and the bottom at mean low water.
The berthing of 10 vessels at the facility should not adversely impact water quality.
(f) Impacts on Natural Resources
The dock is designed to minimize environmental impacts on existing resources, primarily existing
seagrasses as discussed above.
(g) Impacts on Wetlands Habitat/Uplands
The dock will not have an adverse impact on the adjacent uplands but will serve to enhance the uplands.
. .
fCT2-oo"l- J 1004 CITY OF CLEARWATER
APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2nd FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME
ADDRESS
, b3
f3A~s roe:
TO'v\JV H 01-1. ES . l,... L-.c...
.
t>te IV IE:
: -ILA. '" LV A '/
PHONE NUMBER
_72.7 - 5/2 - 04 '=>8
APPLICANT'S NAME
F< 0 <S e;-tfZ.S.
a eAc.. ~ J? ~S1...oP'" b~'"
~7~
C~y~~~ GeA~HI~L
ADDRESS
P,o. (3.0>(
5/.)1 - 04-6B
PHONE NUMBER
AGENT NAME
~ (:) L. A- NJ'".)
ADDRESS
,<:, A M t::
PHONE NUMBER
FAXNUMBER: 7Sq. 2.et e~
FAX NUMBER: 7 e cr - .2. Cf 8 <..
Aot";~C;;:
A:.s
.a. R r") LJ';;:-
FAX NUMBER .
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all
representations made in this application
are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge. . 1/
by /f;/a",cI lI~el5 I who is personally known to
Ten (10) copies of the preliminary plat must be submitted.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me thiscgL day of
AlOI/<:.rnber I A.D,,~j..to me and/or
/1- 7 -()\3
The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale
not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information:
NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE;
TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED;
NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT;
IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES;
EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS;
PROPOSED STREET NAMES;
NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS;
Page 1
CLWCoverSheet
.
.
FLD2002-11041
656 BAYWAY BLVD
Date Received: 11/25/2002
BAYWAY TOWNHOMES
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 285A
, . .
'I :
t "'>'" f
l;;, lu/::rJ u
CK. NO. \ \ SD r /..;
DATE \ \ -;}
~
N :::E ~ ~ . e-
o '; 0 = '; =
0 ~ ~ = = ,.J
!:::! ...... =- iii =- iii .eo
...... ... \rl 1l
\rl 0 = ... 0 =
= = ...
N \rl ::I C't N~ ::I C't N~ p::
--- ...... ~ Q "
...... ...... .... ...... ....
...... .;,; (oI"t e (oI"t
-< -<
;; ..
;;
... ...
Q ] =
Eo- E-
e 'il = ...
QI ... =
... ~ 0 e
.... '"
QI '"' e:
Q = ~ u ....
Z ~ ~ " 0
= Q = ~ :;:;
= ...... .~
8
... N 0.
~ \0
N a.
!!l ...... ctl
"<t Q)
5 ......
I :6
~ 0
~ ...... '0
0
Q)
Q E
z 0
e .U
\C "'" ='='S
QC) I:: E 0
=
~ Q ~ Q)
t'-- u 0.:6
~ ctl 0
<= ...-
<= ..Q ~
<=
<= M Q t:5-o
<= Q Z :!E .- Q)
Q ... 0:: - .-
<= =
M ::I w~~
<= ....... Q r-- 0.=0
<= It'l ... r-- c:C a. e: "'"'
M ... ...... 0
<= ....... -< ...... I-g-E
N .-;
<= .-; Oe:- ~
<= Q; Zctl=
S!25~ Po..
N ;.i
~ = Q cn::B
.. Q z -0.>-
~ ;; .:l: :J: .- -0
.() = I-Q)e:
"i-l '"' " u ctl
Q.. ~ = @-o
.....
~ p:: ctl Q)
~ .!!l ~
~ = 0 ~
= .S! U ~ 1/).-
.- >
... u ~@
=- :0 ~
.;:
... .~ Q)
fi u .0
Q 1i: ~ l
...l
U 8
~
QI 0 ~
~ ...l .!:2
Q ~
U E- o.
= 0 a.
" ::c ctl
.. ~ .!!l
Eo- 0
.. ..c:
QI ~ I-
~
=-
.....
g
......
......
I
N
Q 0
Z 0 1 ,.\o'l
N
~ QI :3 -= (,)
~ <Ii ... ]
QI
U ~ ... ~ U
QI =
...
.... e
QI
= ....
~ "
~
CL WCoverSheet
.
.
PL T2002-11 004
656 BA YW A Y BLVD
Date Received: 11/25/2002
BA YW A Y TOWNHOMES
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 285A
;'-0. i~7~---'"
· ..i' .)
/.:..,'.:,.,..,..'.,.:.....'...'
. " c ~l ,:4' ".
~ :' ,,>-~...\;
j ,'cA _ . '- _.___~",'_:::,:y
11 - (bS__~Q_~_.
N :E "0 "0 . ~
0 .; 0 <= .; <=
0 ~ 0 <= <= .e-
N 0 =- 0 0 =- 0
-- M - - '"
0 <= 0 <= (,)
on Ii:) = = '"
l::::l = \0 \0 = \0 \0 ~
- e ~ Q ~ (,)
- S
- ~
-< -<
~ ..
-;
- ....
Q "S Q
Eo- Eo-
S .~
IIol = ....
IIol U =
- ~ 0 e
... '"
IIol .... c::
~ = ~ (I) ....
~ ~ ~ 0
= Q = ~ ~
== ...... .~
8
u on a.
< 0
~ a.
~ - ro
~ Q)
;j M
I ~
> 0
~ - '0
0
Q)
Q E
;z; 0
S .0
t-- .. ~"5
QO ...: E 0
=
~ Q Ci5 Q)
t-- U a.~
~ ro 0
<= ~ -
<= .eVJ
<= . ro
<= N Q 1::5"0
<= = ;z; ::e .- Q)
= - C:::1i5t+:
<= =
<= N = wo'"
-- Q 0.=0
<= lI'l u 0'1 < a. c:: '+-<
<= N u - 0
-- -< - I- g. .8
M ~
<= ~ Oc::= (I)
<= .. z ro.- ~
~ ~5~ c...
M -
~ = (I)~i5
~ Q
00 ;z; - a. :>.
=It: '" ~ F 'Q) -g
=
...... (I) <C o ro
c.. (I)
.... ~ = ~"O
~ '" ro Q)
CJ ::l .!a ~
0
~ = ~
~ .S VJ.-
- ~ .- >
Cl. - ~ ~
'c (I)
u 0 Q)
'" '" .0
IIol ~
Q j
c::
O~ 0
IIol ~
"0 <~ .~
Q
u ~:E c.
= a::lc... a.
<C (/10 ro
.. ~...:l .!a
Eo-
.. ~~ .s::
IIol t:l> I-
>. O~
<C
=- ~Cl
~
0
-
-
I
N
Q 0 "0
;z; 0 ~
6 Q
~ IIol -= 0
'" ~ e
<C '"
U ~ .... ~
IIol =
~ IIol
IIol 5
= ....
~ ~
~
.
.
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
PIANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
August 24, 2004
Mr. Bill Woods
Woods Consulting, Inc.
322 Ridge Road
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
Re: FLD2002-11041 - 656 Bayway Boulevard
Dear Mr. Woods:
On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with eight conditions the
above referenced case, which was a Flexible Development application (1) to permit attached dwellings
within the Tourist District with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to
pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to
seven feet (to building), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and
building) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to walkway), as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; (2) for a 10-slip
multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601; and (3) Preliminary Plat approval for 11 lots.
A proposal has been submitted to reduce the square-footage of deck area, the width of slips and the length
of slips, while adding one additional slip (new total number of slips is 11) than that originally approved
under the Flexible Development case. The approved dock square-footage is 1,422.5 square feet, whereas
the proposal is to reduce the deck area to 1367 square feet. The approved length of the slip catwalks is 20
feet, whereas the proposal reduces the catwalks to 15 feet in length. The side setback requirements of
24.6 feet will still be exceeded, close to or the same as originally approved (31 feet on east and west).
In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be minor revisions
and are approved. These minor revisions must be shown on the site plans and building plans when
submitting for building permits.
Should you ha
4504. I
questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner, at 727-562-
. f/
" ,
{. \ I
. 1 k
LIS~ L. Ierce
\~~istant Planning Director
S:IPlanning Depar/men/IC D BIFLEXI/nac/ive or Finished ApplicalionslBayway 656 Bayway Townhomes - ApprovedlBayway 656 Minor
Revisions Leller 8.24. 04. doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIO:-JER
Hovr HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILl. JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
JUL-26-21211214 1215: 15 PM ~CONSUL T I NG
.,...' 1.- . ...: "._.' _.0' .1...' ...........,....,-. .......-............... -....,.-... /
727.86 7479
P.I2I1
~~
Envlronmentll Permlttlng Marine Engineering Land Planning
322 Rldg. Road
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
DATE 07/2812004
NO. OF PAGES . 5 (Including thll page)
TO Wayne Weill
FAX NUMBER 562-4865
FROM Bill Wooda
REGARDING eayway Townhomel Docks
MEUAGE
Delr W.yne:
Att.ched II the fIX lent to David Welker, thll dlte, addrea.ing the chlnge requ.ated In the Bayw.y
Townhomel dock d.slgn.
During you meeting, should you heve any queaUona, pl..ae give m. call,
Thanks for your conllderatlon.
My reglrds,
Bill Woods
Woods Consulting
(727) 78&-5747
C:\Projtc!l\B.Iywly townhomea (ae4-02)'&ywIy Townhomea 5Iltt to WeIl..wpcI
.
Offlce: (127) 7ee.S747
FIX: (727) 78e-7479
Emili: billwoodsOwoodsconBulting,Org
,.1,0 ","..._.... ,...~_.._._..........,.,~..-l-..~I
~~_CONSULTING
727f16 7479
P.132
JUL-26-213134 135:15 PM
EnVtronmsnflll Pfrm/ttlng Marine Engineering J-Iydrogeology L.and Planning
~nt vi. fox ,I; V1--1 end \.lS M~I
Mr. Oavld Walker
Plnell., CQunty Environmental Management
512 S. Ft. Harrl,on
ClealWlter, Florida 33758
Re: Bayway Townhomes
Permit No: M32eS5-03
July 28, 2004
322 Ridge Road
Palm Harbor, FL 34883
Cear Mr. Walker:
Bill Woods
Woods Consulting, Inc.
cc: Gus DIGiovanni
C:\ProjtOtl\BIYWIY TaWI\hOl'Ml <*-o2)\8lrnY Townhomet 08 LIr to Wllker.wpCI
Office: (727) 788.5747 Fax: (727) 186..7479
'"
Emall: blllwoods Owoodsconsultlng.org
...-... ,;....."-_.~. ...~..
JUL-26-2004 05:16 PM
WO.S_CONSUL T ING
727.6 7479
P.04
PERMIT TRACKING SVSTEM
BAVWAYTOWNHOMESDOCKS
City of CI..rwa.r
FLD2002-11041
PL T2oo2-11004
11/21/2002: Submitt.d dock plan to City wlth Governale information (12 IStl, signed and seal.d)
01/28/2003: Dev.lopment Order I.sued
~212012003 Obtaln.d .Igneel off permit from City
.,'~ ..
\. I'
Plnell.. County
M3285S.o3
2/2112003:
05/1912003:
0812412003:
OS/011200S:
.,
Expre.. mailed application to County
Admin H.arlng
BOCC mtg
County I..ued permit
Army COrpl
Permit No: 200302301(IP- MaC)
1/912003:
03/14/2003:
03/1912003:
05/01/2003:
09/01/2003:
10/0212003:
10/28/2003:
12101/2003:
01/27/2004:
Milled reviled plan I to Corps and requelted amendment of permit.
R.celved RAI
Fax to Schnepel
Fax to Schnepel requ..tlng .t.tUI
Schnepel called to .ay Mindy Hogan has thll permit.
Called Mindy, No return caU.
Called Rich White: transferred to Mindy Wood
Called Wood and left m....g. a. to etatuI
Permit modification 1,luld
DEP
Permit No: 12-0171173.001
BOT No: 520031483
1/9/2003:
1/1412003:
02/05/2003:
05/0212003:
08/05/2003:
08/11/2003:
09/15/2003:
10/03/2003:
10127/03:
10/29/2003:
12101/2003:
Submitted revised pl,nl to OEP,
copper lample. taken
Submitted copper telt relult1 to OEP (Peterson)
Relubmltted ERP I'Ivlllon to Forehand .t Peterson'l request. Mark cannot IOClte original
pickage.
Rec'd RAI
Sent out 30 day notice.
S.nt Michaela the returned envelop.. Ind reque.ted he caU Emil Pratesl
conservation e...mlnt received and transmitted to Michaele
Ollc with Mlchlele and alked that he expedite
Mliled local government permits
Received DEP completen... Itr
Called Terry Cartwright and reque.ted statuI.
W-W_CONSUL T I NG
727.6 7479
P.05
. .
...... ......-... .,...-. ---,,~.
JUL-26-2004 05:17 PM
01127/2004:
03/15/2004
04/2012004:
05/13/2004:
0512812004:
05/29/2004:
08/02/2004:
08/0912004:
08/0912004:
06/14/2004:
08124/2004:
08/25/2004:
0812812004:
0812812004:
Mlcha.11 h.. all II awaiting lllUlnce of permit by Mlety Forehand
Left mll,lge with Forehand
DEP I..ued Permit
DEP ,tat.d I.... went to TlllahallM two week. ago.
T.rry Cartwright cell.d to relay that Rollnd Rogel'l clned and BIked that the 'e.se btl put
on hold a. he want.d It pl.ced In the nlme of the homeowners AIBOcl.tlon.
Left m....g. wtth Linda Heeth.r regarding statUI of Ilnd lilli, she 18 out until 5/17/2004
Spoke to Lind. Heather, Ihe I. lending the Ilnd '8all Instrument this date certified mill.
Called GUI to I.t him know.
Rec'd reviled land '..11 and WIS picked up by DIGiOvanni
Sent executed land I...e to H'lther
Rec'd lei" blck from He.ther to modify execution. Picked up by client.
R.c'd CE back for re . eJCecutlon II OEP 10lt orlglnll.
Sent r.corded ce to Linda Heethar
Left met,ag. for update on lend ,.... It Linda HHther'l number
Rlc'd Land I...., GUI will pick up and record tod'y 01' Monday.
Rec'd recorded copy of I.... from Gu.
Slnt recorded copy of I.... to Mlchene Brady DE,. T.II.h......
SWFWMD
480215120.00
09/18/2003: SWFWMD 1.lu.d permit for upland.
~.
;0.. .. \' ...
e
.
~~
~..
~~~.1~'
ar=l ~ :-.~~
\oi~,:<-=- ~
;~~~
~~J~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
January 28, 2003
Mr. Roland Rogers
P.O. Box 676
Crystal Beach, FL 34681
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2002-1 1041/PLT2002-1 1004 - 656 Bayway Boulevard
Dear Mr. Rogers:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application (1) to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District
with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions of
the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to
building), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and
building) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to walkway), as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C;
(2) for a lO-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601; and Preliminary Plat
approval for 11 lots. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application
with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER <i BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
:l. .
.
.
January 28, 2003
Rogers - Page Two
3. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording
warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
4. That covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an
administrative level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
5. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building
permits;
6. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
7. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks; and
8. That all storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (January 21, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall
be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of
time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect
of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case
expires on February 4,2003.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.clearwater-fl.com.
~;~
Cynthia Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
Cc: Governale Engineering Services, Inc.
Bill Woods
\\MS5cIPDS\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXiInactive or Finished ApplicationslBayway 656 Bayway Townhomes - ApprovedlBayway 656
Development Order. doc
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Community Development Board
FROM: Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner
DATE: January 17,2003
SUBJECT: FLD2002-11 0411PL T2002-11 004, 656 Bayway Boulevard
The maps and photographs were inadvertently left out of your package
previously sent to you and are attached for your information and use.
e
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
January 13,2003
Mr. Roland Rogers
P.O. Box 676
Crystal Beach, FL 34681
RE: Community Development Board Meeting regarding application for Flexible Development
approval (FLD2002-11041/PLT2002-11004) (1) to permit attached dwellings with a
reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions
of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven
feet (to building), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to
pavement and building), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet
(to walkway), under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (2) for a 10-slip multi-use
dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601; and Preliminary Plat approval for 11 lots.
Dear Mr. Rogers:
The Flexible Development approval (1) to permit attached dwellings with a reduction ofthe front
(south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions ofthe side (east) setback from
10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), reductions of the
side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building), a reduction of the rear
(north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to walkway), under the provisions of Section 2-803.C;
and (2) for a 10-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601; and Preliminary Plat
approval for 11 lots for property located at 656 Bayway Boulevard has been scheduled to be
reviewed by the Community Development Board on January 21, 2003.
The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall
at 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
t-Jtltfl"L M. W~
Wayr/e M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
Cc: Leo Governale, Governale Engineering Services, Inc.
I IMS5clPDSIPlanning Depar/men/IC D BIFLEXlPending caseslReviewed and PendinglBayway 656 Bayway TownhomeslBayway 656 CDB
BRIAN]. AUNcf1!t,t'MA4l5R-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * Bn,L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
, "t
r .
LL
0
>-
f--
U
TO:
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
~\c~~ \G)C? t>,~ ~ ov.~
if
Phone:S ~ 2-- - ~ JO 1-
MESSAGE:
RE: /:;;L-D 2--00 L - i 10 4- I
wS"0 B..~ r.>>J ()\~ cl
C II~ \ p, -\.e ) e\\Qf
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
DATE, TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
12/09 17:54
978'32982
00: 02: 11
04
OK
STANDARD
ECM
TIME 12/09/2002 17:55
NAME PLA~~
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
\
TIME 12/09/2002 11:09
~~AME PLAN
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
DATE,TIME
FAX NO. INA~1E
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
12/09 11:07
97892982
00:02:10
04
OK
STANDARD
ECM
RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME 12/09/2002 11:13
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
DATE, TIME
FAX ~iO. /NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
12/09 11:11
98138551572
00:02:13
04
OK
STANDARD
ECM
.
RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME 12/09/2002 11:19
~~AME PLAN
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
DATE, TIME
FAX NO./i'IAME
DURA TI m~
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
12/09 11: 15
97333759
00:02:43
04
OK
STANDARD
I "
.
.
'"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPAR1MENT
December 9,2002
Mr. Roland Rogers
Rogers Beach Development
P.O. Box 676
Crystal Beach, FL 34681
RE: Application for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a
reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions
ofthe side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven
feet (to building), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to
pavement and building), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet
(to walkway) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C; (2) approval for an eleven-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of
Section 3-601and (3) Preliminary Plat approval for 11 lots (Case Nos. FLD2002-11041
and PLT2002-11004, 656 Bayway Boulevard).
Dear Mr. Rogers:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for (1) Flexible Development approval to
permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet
(to pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and
from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five
feet (to pavement and building), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet
(to walkway) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section
2-803.C; (2) approval for an eleven-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-
601and (3) Preliminary Plat approval for 11 lots at 656 Bayway Boulevard. After a preliminary
review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete, but
with the following submissions or revisions necessary:
1. Revise application to show all property owners and the correct names of the property
owners. DiGiovanni Partners - Bayway LLC has only a 35 percent interest in the
property. Application is unclear as to the ownership of the other 65 percent interest in the
property.
2. Affidavit - provide relationship of Augustino DeGiovanni to DeGiovanni Partners
(partner, president, etc.). Ensure application and affidavit match as to owner.
~:\Baxw(lY 656 C(Jumlete Letter. doc
BRIAN J. AlJNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * Bll.L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
J '
.
.
f(
December 9, 2002
Rogers - Page 2
3. Signature on application is that of Roland Rogers, yet the notary is stating that the
signature is of Augustino DiGiovanni. Is the notary not verifying whom is signing the
application correctly and by providing on the notary statement that they have provided an
identification (such as driver's license) or being personally known to the notary?
4. Provide on Sheet 1/1 of engineer's plans the proposed height of the building from the
FEMA NGVD 11 feet elevation to the roof deck. Also provide same height on building
elevation drawings sheet A-2.
3. Provide on Sheet 1/1 the typical driveway width by a garage.
4. On Sheet 1/1, please take off the existing development so as to better see the proposed
improvements.
5. Provide on Sheet 1/1 in the Land Use Data the square footage and percent ofland area of
the paved vehicular use area.
6. Provide on Sheet 1/1 in the Land Use Data the square footage and percentage of the
vehicular use area for interior green space (required is 10 percent if vehicular use area is
less than 4,000 square feet or 12 percent ifmore than 4,000 square feet).
7. Provide on Sheet 1/1 in the Land Use Data the percentage of lot area for existing and
proposed conditions for building coverage, paving, sidewalks/pool area and open space.
8. Unclear as how unit owners will get to pool and docks. If by a sidewalk, ensure such
sidewalk is included in the site data.
9. Site information does not indicate whether there are any existing trees and, if so, whether
they are to be preserved or removed. Advise/show. Site plan is also to show any trees on
adj acent property within 25 feet of the property line.
10. Show location of closest fire hydrant. If installation of a fire hydrant is necessary, show
on site plan.
11. Fire Department will require a Fire Department connection out by the proposed docks. A
connection is shown, however, no water line connection is shown. Provide.
12. Drive aisle is only 15 feet wide, indicating a one-way traffic flow. Indicate such flow on
the site plan. Provide enter/do not enter signage at driveways.
13. For a one-way traffic flow, driveways are designed at a 20-foot width, which is too wide
for one-way flow and too narrow for two~way flow. Narrow driveways to a maximum of
16 feet (should increase side setback on south side to pavement).
14. Show visibility triangles at the property line, not the back of curb (Engineering and
landscaping plans).
15. Check with Engineering Department as to appropriate location of sidewalk within the
right-of-way (shown is at back of street curb).
16. Provide a proposed grading plan.
17. Provide a signed/sealed copy of drainage calculations to Planning Department (if
previously submitted). If not previously submitted, provide two copies.
18. Any proposed signage or outdoor lighting? Show or state.
19. Note: Building Code requires an l8-foot setback from the seawall. Proposed pool
encroaches into this Building Code setback. May need to re-engineer seawall.
20. Preliminary Plat - show all proposed easements.
,"
.
.
,
December 9, 2002
Rogers - Page 3
21. Curb all landscaped areas with six-inch high concrete curbing for the protection of
landscaping from vehicular encroachment.
Any responses to the above comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional
comments will be provided at the DRC meeting. The above comments and comments you will
receive at the DRC meeting must be addressed and submitted to the Planning Department by
4:30 p.m. on December 20, 2002 (15 copies of all submittals).
The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency at 11 :20 AM on
December 12, 2002, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second
floor of the Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater. You or a
representative must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding
your application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access
zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.c1earwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
W~NL M, \,;)~
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
Cc: Governale Engineering Services, Inc.
Patty Stough, Architect
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: J anuarv 21. 2003
Case Number: FLD2002-11041/PL T2002-11004
Agenda Item: D6
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Gus DiGiovanni.
APPLICANT:
Bayway Townhomes, LLC.
REPRESENTATIVE:
Rogers Beach Development, Mr. Roland Rogers.
LOCATION:
656 Bayway Boulevard.
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval (1) to permit attached dwellings
within the Tourist District with a reduction of the front (south)
setback from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions of the
side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from
10 feet to seven feet (to building), reductions of the side (west)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and a
reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to
walkway), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; (2) for a 10-slip multi-use
dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601; and Preliminary Plat
approval for 11 lots.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by Governale Engineering Services, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.67 acres; 29,216 square feet.
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 240 feet of width along Bayway Boulevard by 120 feet of depth.
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Overnight accommodations
Attached townhome dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
RFH, Resort Facilities High Classification
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11041IPLT2002-
11 004 - Page 1
.
.
ZONING DISTRICT:
T, Tourist District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Intracoastal waterway
West: Attached dwellings (condo)
East: Vacant (proposed attached townhome dwellings)
South: Outdoor recreation; retail; overnight accommodations
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Multi-family dwellings, overnight accommodation and commercial
uses dominate the immediate vicinity.
ANALYSIS:
The rectangular site is 0.67 acres located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately
800 feet west of Gulf Boulevard. It is located along a highly developed area within Clearwater
Beach and has frontage along Clearwater Bay. The site is located within the South
Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach By Design, which is a distinctive area of mixed uses,
including high-rise condominiums, resort hotels and commercial uses. Beach by Design
contemplates this District will be an area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to
improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach.
The site is currently developed with a two-story, V -shaped, 40-room motel (Howard Johnson).
The existing building is approximately 20 feet in height. The site has one, undefined, existing
driveway along most of the south property line (Bayway Boulevard), where parking spaces "back
out" into the right-of-way. The site is currently nonconforming with regard to "back out" parking
and front, side and rear setbacks. The site also contains a small dock on the north side. All
existing improvements (buildings, pavement, walkways and dock) will be removed as part of the
site's redevelopment.
The proposal includes constructing an II-unit, three-story townhome building. The building will
contain two floors of living area above one floor of ground-level parking. Each unit will be
approximately 2,250 square feet in area (not including the garage or the rooftop deck). The
parking will include two garage spaces per unit. The development will operate as and have the
characteristics of single-family homes, including the individual garages. Redevelopment of this
site will eliminate the back out parking, providing much safer vehicle maneuvering on-site in a
one-way traffic flow, with access confined to two, 16-foot wide driveways (entrance on north side;
exit on south side).
The request is to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction ofthe front
(south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from
10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), reductions of the
side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and a reduction in the rear
(north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to walkway), under the provisions of Section 2-803 as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The reduction in side setbacks from 10 to seven
(east) and five (west) feet is a function of the unit size and the desire to cant the units on a slight
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-l1041IPLT2002-
11 004 - Page 2
.
e
angle producing a "saw tooth" fa<;ade for visual interest, providing additional landscaping and a
more economically viable project. The Building Code requires an 18-foot separation between
structures and the seawall (the pool is at a to-foot separation). Adjustments to this separation may
be reviewed by the Building Official.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color (putty white and butter
beige) stucco, "Florida" blend (multi-color) color barrel tile roof and a significant number of
windows and balconies on all elevations. The trim and detail color will be white and mahogany
red. The building will also be articulated with the unit entries protruding from the front fa<;ade
and with the end units having bay windows on the second and third floors. On the rear of the
building, units will be provided with roof-top decks accessed via spiral staircases for additional
outdoor living areas.
The landscape plan exceeds the Code requirements, utilizing a variety of colorful groundcovers
(including lantana, lirope and sea grape), shrubs (including Indian hawthorn, vibumam and
podacarpus) and trees (including cabbage palms, tree form ligustrum and tree form oleander). The
landscape plan also includes a variety of interesting specimen plants (including cardboard palms
and lily). Additional landscaping will be possible on the roof-top decks at the rear of the building.
The applicant will remove all signs. No new signs are proposed with this development. Solid
waste will be removed via black barrel service for each unit. All required Parks and Recreation
fees will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. The applicant will be
selling the units fee simple, which includes land, and will record a Final Plat prior to the issuance
of building permits.
Section 3-601.C.3 of the Code requires docks over 500 square feet in area (in association with a
multi-family development or condominium) be treated as a commercial dock and be approved as
part of a Level Two, Flexible Development review. The applicant proposes to remove the small,
existing dock on the north side. As part of the redevelopment of this site, the applicant proposes to
construct a to-slip, 1,422.5 square-foot, multi-use dock for the exclusive use of residents and/or
guests of the townhome development. Sub-leasing these docks will not be allowed. The proposed
dock includes a 30 feet long walkout from the seawall to avoid existing sea grasses, which will
include handrails to prevent docking. The dock will extend a total of 56.4 feet from the seawall,
which is significantly less than the maximum allowable of 182.5 feet (75 percent of waterfront lot
width). The proposed dock should not constitute a navigational hazard, as the proposed length
represents a maximum of 8.4 percent of the waterway width (maximum of 25 percent allowed).
The proposed dock will be 182.5 feet in width, which is less than the 184.5 feet width allowed.
The dock will be set back 30.7 feet (east) and 32.7 feet (west) from the extended property lines,
which is greater than the minimum setback of24.6 feet.
Prior to the issuance of building permits for the docks, the applicant will need to show compliance
with National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) standards for "marinas and boat yards" for the
construction and operation of the docking facilities to provide fire protection of boats moored in
the slips. Floating and dock supported signage will need to be permanently installed warning
boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity. Lighting on the end
ofthe dock should be installed to enhance navigation safety.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11041IPLT2002-
11004 - Page 3
.
e
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-801.1):
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 30 dwelling units per 42 overnight 11 dwelling Yes
acre (20 units)/40 accommodation units
overnight units
accommodation
units per acre (26
units)
IMPERVIOUS 0.95 0.645 0.72 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO (ISR)
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803):
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 29,216 square 29,216 square Yes
(minimum) feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 240 feet 240 feet Yes
(minimum)
FRONT N/A South: zero feet South: five feet Yes
SETBACK to pavement; 20 to pavement; 30
feet to building feet to building
REAR N/A North: 6.5 feet North: 28 feet to Yes
SETBACK to building and building; zero
shuffleboard feet to walkway
court
SIDE N/A East: five feet to East: five feet to Yes
SETBACK building; zero pavement; seven
feet to pavement feet to building
West: 14.5 feet West: five feet to
to building; zero pavement and
feet to pavement building
HEIGHT N/A 20 feet 29.33 feet to roof Yes
maximum deck; 31.33 feet
to mean roof
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11041IPLT2002-
11004 - Page 4
.
e
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
PARKING Determined by 23 spaces 22 spaces (two Yes
SPACES the Community per dwelling unit
minimum Development in the garages)
Director based
on the specific
use and! or ITE
Manual standards
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803.C):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development
standards.
The subject property was developed in 1956 and has been used as overnight
accommodations since that time. The existing two-story building on the site has undergone
some deterioration, but is in fair condition. The proposal includes the redevelopment of
the site with an II-unit townhome development with fee simple lot ownership. The
applicant desires to develop in an area of strategic revitalization and renovation, identified
in "Beach by Design, " with direct access to Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf.
The applicant proposes eleven mid-level, luxury townhomes compatible with Beach by
Design. The allowable density for this site would permit 20 dwelling units. The applicant
desires a building residential in character. The requested setback reductions make the site
more marketable and usable due to unit size resulting in a building consistent with Beach
by Design. Many properties along Bayway Boulevard currently have zero setbacks to
property lines and "back out" parking onto Bayway Boulevard. Many of the existing
parking spaces for these properties exist within the right-of-way. The applicant proposes to
provide on-site parking, reducing the number of and width of driveways to two and 16 feet
respectively, for a one-way traffic flow.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
The proposed residential use will help stabilize and likely enhance property values in the
area by providing a refurbished site and a new building. The current assessed valuation of
the site is $1,970,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the assessed valuation is
projected at $7,150,000. This increase in property value is expected to have a beneficial
effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the City of Clearwater.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11 041IPL T2002-
11 004 - Page 5
.
.
The City of Clearwater permits attached dwellings. The site is located within the South
Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach By Design which is an area of strategic
revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of
Clearwater Beach.
4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Adjacent land uses to the west are multi-family residential dwellings, whereas proposed
townhome attached dwellings and overnight accommodations uses are to the east.
Overnight accommodation and commercial uses are to the south. The proposal includes
removing all existing buildings and all asphalt on the site and enhancing the site with a
new building and landscaping which exceeds the intent of Code. The site is located within
the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach By Design which is an area of strategic
revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of
Clearwater Beach. The proposal will aid in the revitalization of the Bayway Boulevard and
Clearwater Beach as a whole. This location provides an opportunity to redevelop a portion
of Clearwater that is currently undergoing renewed investment and redevelopment.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
The location of the site, in relation to Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf of Mexico, makes it
uniquely and ideally suited for the proposed attached dwelling development. The applicant
desires to locate a multi-family development with a single-family character along
waterfront property within an emerging, residential neighborhood. Properties with these
characteristics are limited within the City. The applicant is developing a property
consistent with and encouraged by Beach by Design and is developing other similar
projects on Clearwater Beach.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The Mediterranean architecture and landscape design will set a new
standard for the area. It may influence similar redevelopment efforts in the area.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will play a role in the continuing positive changes of
Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a revitalized site and building. The site
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-110411PL T2002-
11004 - Page 6
1- -
.
.
is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach By Design which is an
area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the
balance of Clearwater Beach. The proposed development will play an important role in the
continuing revitalization of the beach. The City will benefit by having an attractive
building located in a redeveloping area. The proposed building and landscape
enhancements will significantly improve the site, as well as the elimination of parking
backing out into Bayway Boulevard. The current proposal incorporates well-articulated
unified elevations and coordinated architectural elements.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the
demolition of the existing building and site improvements and the construction of an
attractive residential development. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of a
revitalized Clearwater Beach and is consistent with Beach by Design. Due to unit size to
meet market demands and the "saw tooth" building design, the requested setback
reductions are necessary to comply with various other Code provisions and make the site
otherwise unusable.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Adequate parking is being provided on-site. The proposal, as part of a Flexible
Development for attached dwellings, would require 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit or 17
spaces. The proposal includes two garage spaces per dwelling unit or 22 spaces.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3 (Beach by Design).
The proposal eliminates "back out" parking by limiting access to two, 16- foot wide
driveways to effect a one-way traffic flow and on-site vehicle maneuvering for the on-site
enclosed garage spaces. The proposed Mediterranean architecture will be aesthetically
pleasing, blending with other similar projects to the north in the Small Motel District. The
proposed landscaping will lend in differentiating Clearwater Beach from other beach areas.
The residential design of the proposed project will help to create a sense of a "beach
community neighborhood" along Bayway Boulevard.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11041IPLT2002-
11004 - Page 7
IU
!
e
.
D. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DOCKS UNDER
THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 3-601.C.3:
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
SETBACKS 10 percent of the East: 196.5 feet East: 30.7 feet Yes
minimum width of the West: 29.5 feet West: 32.7 feet
property (246
feet; 24.6 feet
minimum)
LENGTH 75 percent of the 33 feet 56.4 feet Yes
maximum width of the
property (246
feet; 184.5 feet
maximum)
WIDTH 75 percent ofthe 20 feet 182.5 feet Yes
maximum width of the
property (246
feet; 184.5 feet
maximum)
E. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL DOCKS UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 3-601.C.3:
1. Use and Compatibility.
a) The proposed dock shall be subordinate to and contribute to the comfort,
convenience or necessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use of the
property.
The site is being developed with an II-unit attached dwelling complex. The proposed
dock will serve as an amenity to residents only.
b) The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent
properties and the neighborhood in general.
Adjacent docks are less in length than the proposed docks. The proposed dock must be
longer to avoid any impacts to existing sea grasses along the shoreline on the eastern
side of the site. The proposed dock is in harmony with the scale and character of docks
in the general area within 1,100 feet, where some extend approximately 100 feet from
the seawall.
c) The proposed dock shall be compatible with dock patterns in the general vicinity.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11041IPLT2002-
11004 - Page 8
.
.
The proposed dock is compatible with, and will not have any detrimental impacts to,
navigation patterns in the general vicinity. While existing adjacent docks are smaller in
length, the proposed dock is consistent with docks in the area. The proposed dock
extends further from the seawall than adjacent docks in order to avoid existing sea
grasses. Upgraded docking facilities to accommodate larger boats is consistent with the
development of upscale townhomes on the upland.
2. Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities. The use of the proposed dock shall
not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently using the
adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, it shall
not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent waterway by uses including
but not limited to non-motorized boats and motorized boats.
The proposed dock will not affect navigation patterns in the area by persons using the
adjacent waterways for recreational or commercial purposes. The proposed dock will be
setback further from the west property line than the existing dock. The proposed dock will
not impact the users of the boat slips to the east or west.
3. Impacts on Navigation. The existence and use of the proposed dock shall not have a
detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation,
recreational or other public conveniences.
The proposed dock will extend 56.4 feet from the shoreline/seawall. The waterway width
at this location varies in width from approximately 670 to 748 feet (average of 725 feet).
The proposed dock will not have any detrimental impacts on navigation patterns in the
general vicinity, nor impact the users of the boat slips to the east or west.
4. Impacts on Marine Environment.
a) Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid injury to marine
grass beds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas.
The proposed docks have been specifically designed to prevent boat access over marine
grassbeds along the shoreline on the eastern portion of the site. The proposed dock
walkout will extend 30 feet from the seawall to avoid the sea grasses. The walkout
(both sides) and the entire south side ofT-head dock will have handrails to preclude the
mooring of boats along those portions of the dock to avoid negative impacts to the
existing sea grasses. Signage should be installed to warn boaters of grass beds and
manatees, as well as lights to notify boaters of the dock.
b) Docks shall not have an adverse impact upon natural marine habitats, grass flats
suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life, or established marine soil
suitable for producing plant growth of a type useful as nursery or feeding grounds
for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs and any such artificial reef
which has developed an associated flora and fauna which have been determined to
be approaching a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11 0411PL T2002-
11004 - Page 9
.
.
diversity; oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or
sport fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habitats desirable as juvenile fish
habitat.
The proposed dock has been sited to avoid negative impacts on surrounding marine
habitats.
5. Impacts on Water Quality.
a) All turning basin, access channels, boat mooring areas and any other area
associated with a dock shall have adequate circulation and existing water depths
to ensure that a minimum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest
member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the waterbody at
mean or ordinary low water (-0.95 NGVD datum).
The depth of water in the area where boats will berth is a minimum of approximately
seven to ten feet at mean low water. This depth should be sufficient to provide at least
a minimum of one foot of clearance between the lowest member of a vesse; amd the
bottom at mean low water.
b) The dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage,
shoaling of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently existing in the
area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in
the area in which the dock is proposed to be located.
The proposal will not adversely affect water quality. Storm drainage for the upland
development will not affect the water quality in the area of the proposed docks.
6. Impacts on Natural Resources.
a) The dock shall not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of
wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so
as to be contrary to the public interest.
The proposed docks have been designed and located in such a manner to avoid any
negative impact on existing resourses, primarily the existing sea grasses.
b) The dock shall not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative,
terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species providing
one or more of the requirements to sustain their existence, such as range, nesting
or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which
would serve to make them rare within the confines of the City; designated
preservation areas such as those identified in the comprehensive land use plan,
national wildlife refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated
preservation areas, and bird sanctuaries.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11041IPLT2002-
11004 - Page 10
.
.
The proposed docks will not be located near any preservation areas, bird sanctuaries or
national wildlife refuges. These docks will serve the residents of the townhome project
proposed for construction on the upland areas of the site. The dock has been located in
such a manner as to avoid a sea grass beds along the shoreline on the eastern portion of
the site.
7. Impacts on Wetlands Habitat/Uplands. The dock shall not have a material adverse
affect upon the uplands surrounding.
There are no wetland or upland habitats in the vicinity of the subject site, therefore, there
will be no adverse impacts to these communities.
F. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with overnight accommodations between one and two stories to
the east (and proposed townhome dwellings), four-story with ground floor parking multi-
family dwellings to the west and overnight accommodation and commercial uses to the
south. This proposal includes luxury townhomes to be sold fee simple, with amenities
including a dock and swimming pool. It will provide a positive redevelopment example
for the area. The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio
standards within the Tourist District. The site is located within the South
Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach By Design. The proposal is consistent and in
harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage and density, and is compatible with the existing and
emerging character, ofthe adjacent properties and with Beach by Design.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is zoned Tourist District and is in an area characterized by multi-family dwellings,
overnight accommodation establishments and commercial uses. The character and
intensity of the proposed development will be in compliance with that zoning
classification. The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio
standards within the Tourist District. The proposal is consistent with Beach by Design and
will help generate a more appropriate mix of residential uses and encourage the like-
redevelopment of other sites. The proposed redevelopment will substantially improve the
value ofthe subject property, which will have a positive impact on surrounding properties.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11 041IPL T2002-
11004 - Page 11
.
.
The proposed residential use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the
neighborhood, is permitted in the Tourist District and is encouraged Beach by Design. The
proposal includes eleven owner-occupied, dwelling units with landscaping and the number
of parking spaces in excess of Code requirements in addition to other on-site amenities.
The proposal eliminates parking that backs out into, and is located within, the right-of-way
of Bayway Boulevard, providing enhanced pedestrian safety.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will improve the existing ingress/egress point of access from
Bayway Boulevard, which is basically one large driveway/parking area. The proposal
includes redeveloping the site with eleven attached townhome dwellings replacing 40
existing motel rooms. Vehicle trip generation will decrease with the proposal from 364
trips/weekday to 64 trips/weekday. This reduction, in concert with the elimination of the
back out parking and reduction of driveway width(s) from 240 feet to two, 16-foot wide
one-way driveways, will improve the level of service (LOS) on Bayway Boulevard.
Vehicles will be able to back out and maneuver on-site to "head out" onto Bayway
Boulevard.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with the intent for the South Beach/Clearwater
Pass District under Beach by Design, which is an area of strategic revitalization and
renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach.
Construction of these attached townhomes will change and raise the standards of the
community character of this area of the immediate vicinity, through attractive architecture
and well-designed landscaping.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes removing all existing buildings and pavement and constructing a 11-
unit, three-story townhome building with first-floor garages, attractive architecture and
well-designed landscaping. Existing parking spaces located within, and backing into, the
right-of-way of Bayway Boulevard will be eliminated. Residents will utilize black barrels
for trash collection, which will be stored within their garages on days other than pick-up
days.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11041IPLT2002-
11004 - Page 12
.
.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on December 12, 2002. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development request (1) to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction
of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to building),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and a
reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to walkway), as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; (2) for a
10-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601; and Preliminary Plat approval for
11 lots for the site at 656 Bayway Boulevard, with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
3. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording
warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
4. That covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an
administrative level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
5. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building
permits;
6. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
7. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks; and
8. That all storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11 041IPL T2002-
11 004 - Page 13
.
.
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
I\MS5c\PDSIPlanning Department\C D BlFLEXiPending caseslReviewed and PendinglBayway 656 Bayway TownhomeslBayway 656 Staff
Report.doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11 041IPL T2002-
11004 - Page 14
M'::;S
g <
N <n
00 ,.....,
-- ,.....,
,....., 0
o
,.....,
OJ)
= .....t
;: ~ C
rI.l.....t>
... .....t ..J
~ I to
M
~g>-
;:: M ~
;s 9 >-
e.J~<C
<..to
~::f:t:~
rI.l ~ cg
~ rIJ
u~
'"
o
~~
g~
--
N
~
~
~
z
o
o
lI)
s:::
o
Z
'"
o
o
N
--
<n
~
,.....,
s.;!l As ~
6 ~ ~ ]"U;....
.& lI)u ~ ~ ~ s ~~~
~ ]~ S ~ ~S ~.S g~g
~ ~~ ~ 16 . ~~ ~1o
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o~ 0 ~~s:::
16 ;, 5b . ~ S OJ .S ~ jJ ';>, -j:; ~
~ _OJo<8 E !a P."lij >. ~~!a
~ C~, ~ ~ 8 ~ ~o
s::: 0 0 0 ~ .- t: _ 6:S ;:l ~ >.
'e ~oooo:S .5 8 s:::U ~ ~s:::1
.... .... ..s::: E [) '-..8 0 ..0 ~ J:i
~c.85cn - ~ ~ ~ ::3~t-
:g 0 ] .& 51 ~ 'S [) S ]> <l:l ~ .~ 8-
u ~~~.~ ~ ~ ..S ~ ~~.S
~ g;;]~ob~ ~ :SE ~~ 16u.!!
"'" .-..., -a :s s::: s::: = ~ .- s::: t) 0 .
u 5 ~ s::: , ':8 S ;Q \0 ~ - ..s::: '0'"2 8
~ s~18'~~ k ~~ ~~ Q~Ea
tl :.e.8 ~ ~ R ~ ~ s::: s:: .E: ~ >.;.= ~ .~
P. OJ5~"" OJ 0 ~o OJ~ ..o>.~~
S ~'E=51S.~ ..s::: ~~ ..o~~1li:S6
- ~~S'~6~ 16 g~ SOJ~=p'o
S ~ ~ OJ >. 'C ~ - ~ 0 ~:Q P.'~ 8 ~ ~
._ .'_ '" ~ P. ~ P. c.... u ~ ""..0 P. 0 0
~ ~ i'~ ~ ~ ~ q 6 q 8 e- ~ ~ s j fil !a ~ .;;
o s....78o ouoS~~sS~>'~>'~
~ ] ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ S .~ S ] ~ "5 ~ :s ti1 ~ .S ~ .a
~ g8'~~-lI)""~"" .~~~~~;:lll)3
~d~u~<.s~.os:::.ozo..s:::?~~~~~~
~0$aa~,~~&~&~~.~~~~~a~~
'"
o
~ ::;Sl
Ou
~
N
N
o
00
~~
N
,.....,
.
~
i>
'S:
',p
<>
-0:
11
"
u
::;Sl
U
.....:l
~
::;s
";j
.g
.~
:.e
.S
{j
~
~C'-.
~ ~
"5 ~
:k~
~~
'c..s::: ....
u.~ <8
a C C'-' ~
o~ 8til
+J ....... ._ "'0 >--
1:: ~;, lI) i
.~ ~ i ~ g.
"o1lll)~";j ~
U)c;j_ ~~:j :::3
Z .- -~ .... !a ~ w
~ .... 6 OJ .~ Co P
~ ~ ~ <J:: .... .- ~
::;s~ S"o1l] ~~
OJ5E:'g~~ ~q)
u~ ~U..s::: ..0
..q-~8ocntl) ..8,S
:5 OJ =OJ s ~ so.
::::~.s Gl.;;1l ;; ~
,~~lI)>.OJ ~
~ ~ "3 ~ OJ": .@ u.
o5bo..s:::~,-;::: 0:1_
f:j.EV5:~~ .&If::
~<S3u5'.:Qiii'~
~
'"
o
o
C:!~
~~
,.....,
'"
o
o
C:!~
~~
-
o
.....:l
o
::r:
o
.....:l
o
::r:
I/)
......
o
OJ
~
t:l..
OJ
s:::
o
Z
lI)
s:::
o
Z
OJ
s:::
o
Z
OJ
s:::
o
Z
'" '" '" '"
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
C:! N C:! N
-- --
<n <n <n <n
C:! N N ~
-- --
,....., - ,....., -
s::: 0..
0 .S 0
.~ ....
~ ~ "d 0..
.~ OJ lI) ~
0. lI) .d
.;;: .;;: s:::
:::.:::,; u 'B
0.. ~ OJ ~
~~l < p:: tl ;::l
- ~ ~ .J::J
s::: ~ .S ~ <
lI)~ s::: =
~ ~ ~ .... 0
u lI) E-<
u u S s::: ....
s::: ..... !<=: s::: .... lI)
lI) lI) ...... '5iJ ;::l ~ ~ ~
s g ~ u......
~ s::: 00..
<~ ~ 00.. ~o
0 0 <n <n
-0 r- oo ~ M
'-' 0 0 N N
t- o 0 < <
0 0 0 0
.....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l
r.... r.... r.... r....
'"
o
o
C:!
,.....,
,.....,
--
N
"""::'E
:5 <
N 1.0
00 .....
;:::; .....
?
o
.....
ell
= ~
~ ~ C
rI}~>
.... ~ -'
~ I In
M
~g>-
:.:: M ~
~ 9 ~
u~<(
< .. In
QJ~~
rI} ~ co
~ fI}
u~
e
"0
"~
.8
"5
o
"0
Cl)
~
P..
-d'
~
o:l
...c::
6
"i
I:lJ)
';;:
o:l
:::
'i,
.
'"
:::
B
:.a
6
u
~
'"
'"
o
o
~(/.l
o~
~~
N
(/.l
~
~
(/.l
~
~
~
Z
o
Cl
<I)
l::
o
Z
'"
o
o
N
---
o
N
---
N
s s:;:
'8. 0
c::: ~
Cl) o:l ....
~o.. "'-
o:lE "8
fr'1ji Cl
Cl~ 10
Cl) .....
;;:= 6 6.
...... '.p I:J
o:lE ~"P
0<5 o:l :::-
.- -e ::: 0
~f 8 S
:o~ ~E
5 ~ 'I: g.
gjO ~]en
~1;1 .....J.>z
.....~!3BWO
~O"O<I)o:lp
... '<:/" d ::: 0......
~:::.....;:l-;:Cl
:I: ,- 5 Q) 0 Z
Cl) :; E '!:: 'I: 0
.!::l ;> p.."'"' p.. u
"'"' :::0 O~ !ij ~
o:l o""......~
~ '"8 8> ~ ~ en
OQ) O<=>O
...c:: S ...c:: 'VI
enoo:lenQ)~
....:UBN0;5~
~
i-
:E
to
<<:
~
'"
u
rIi
rIi Cl.l
,8- <1l
c;; [{J
I 0 5b
'6 -; ~
o ,S '"
::'E ~ g
...... g. ';;:
M..."O
.......~o
'"
6
'.p
:.a
5
u
~
en
N
o
~<
!0 ~I
N
.....
'"
o
o
~u
1.0 .....1
~
N
U
.....1
~
Z
o
Cl
on
t...,
o
N
Q)
gp
~
"0
..
...
.g~
Q"
;;;,
'"
o
o
~~
---
N
,'<
o
o
~~
~~
.....
'"
o
o
~~
.....
Q)
l::
o
Z
,'<
o
o
~
1.0
~
N
'" '" '" ,'< ,'< '" '" '" '" '"
.... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ N
..: --- --- ---
Q on on on on on on on on on on
~ ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ N ~
-... --- ---
...... ...... ..... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ..... .....
.....
'" ~
'" .....
<I) l:: u <I)
l:: ,9 o:l '> ~
<I) S'
..... "0 ..... Q) Q)
:::.:: Q) ..... u o:l ~ '>
Q.. ;::l ~ ;3 ......
u 0 Q) ~
~~I 8 u u ~ u
"0 ;>.. "0 c; ~ ...
0 ~ 2 U 4-< Q) ;::l ... ~
U Q) o:l '> 0 Q) <I)
'(;l t:: o:l Q) ~ '" ..... '>
t..., Q) <I) ~ o:l
0 ::'E ;::l ... 01) ~ ~
(/.l U o:l ~ Q)
... ~
Q) 0 <I) g. ,S "0 '" c; "0
t:: <I) o:l u ... <I) 01) l:: 0 <I)
<I) ci ~ ::'E ... <I) <I) <I) <I) o:l ..... ,!:I
~ Cl~ > ~ .....l ~ (/.l ~
0 '<:/" 00 0 1.0 on 0 0 0 0
-", "'" '<:/" ..... M ..... ..... 1.0 on ..... N
u N N 0 ..... 0 0 0 0 0 0
I- < < < < < < Cl Cl Cl Cl
Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl
.....l .....l ~ ~ .....l .....l .....l .....l ~ .....l
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'"
o
o
~~
~~
.....
'"
o
~~
~~
.....
'"
o
~~
---
N
,'<
o
o
~~
~~
---
N
<
~I
~
~
<
~I
~
~
Cl
~
Z
o
Cl
o
z
<I)
l::
o
Z
o
~
::r:
<I)
l::
o
Z
o
~
::r:
o
~
::r:
<I)
l::
o
Z
<I)
l::
o
Z
'"
o
o
~
N
.....
---
N
N
o
o
N
---
on
---
N
.....
N
o
o
N
---
on
---
N
.....
M' ::E e e e-
o
0 <( i-
N 1.0 ';;
--- .....
00 ~
--- u
..... ..... ..:
0 ~
0 os
..... U
rIl
.~
;a
5
C,)
~
en
N ,'< ,'<
0 0 0
~ 0 Ci 0 ~ 0 ~
N ~ N
---
--- E=: 0 on
Cl 1.0 M ~
---
N ---
..... N .....
eI:l Ci ~ s:
...... s:
= ~ f-;
.... ~ c
..... =
(I} ~ >
.... ~ ...J
~ I m
N
~ => on
<+--
..... ~~ 0
....
.. M
.... 9<( (l)
..... ~ ~ [;p
~ ~
-< ~m ~ Z ~
~ U) 0 0
~ It) Cl Cl Cl
(I} Qj U)
~ ~
u ~ (l) (l) (l)
U i:I i:I i:I
0 0 0
z z Z
N ,'< ,'<
0 0 0
0 0 0
N ~ ~
--- 0 .....
1.0
--- ..... ~
N ---
..... N .....
,'< ,'<
0 0
0 0
~ ~
on on
~ ~
..... .....
~ "'C
<l)
<l) >
::.: ' 'S: '0
u <l) C,)
~~I ~ <l)
....
E i:I
rIl ...... 0
c<I '+;l
~ .....
'" c<I
> u
:'9 .....
<l) P..
'0 ...... Q..
en C/.i <(
0 0 0
-0 '<t '<t .....
u 0 ..... 0
I- Cl <( <(
Cl Cl Cl
.....:l .....:l .....:l
~ ~ ~
~::E
8 ~
N 1.0
00 -
--- -
- 0
o
-
l:)J)
= 1""'4
~ ~ C
~1""'4>
..... 1""'4 ...J
~ M OJ
.c g >-<c
..... N ;:
;s 9 ~
~~<c
< .. ~
~:;t:1t)
~ ~ CD
~ ~
u~
:=.::: "
u
~~I
-c
....u
o. ....<lJ OtIJ ~ ~8. >. ~
,"" 't1...c OIl d S S d ..0 6 <+= 6.
.- "- .... d <lJ <+-< d . i:)
<lJb~on ~ ..s>6~6 ~B6 ~~ ~ ~~~ ~0Il ~~>.2i~ 'E ~~
..s [1.0 > ~.o~..s~ ~~ d <lJ <lJfi~~""~ ~~S1S~ ~ ~
"2 ~ ~] cS ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ 1.~] E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~] ~ ~ 8.g.~ ~ b ~ 0 .~ t~
d ._ Po -.:> "[j tIJ i:) 0...... up..> <lJ ...c 0 g' <lJ g' 0 <lJ B. ::l ~ -0 <lJ <lJ 83 ~ ~ ....!;:
e: ~ J; ~ (:l dj OIl g Q- 6 ;.; g, ~ OIl ~"Q) <lJ ~ <lJ "5 ~ !il <lJ :: W a .s i:) a ~ ;.:: ~ ~ g
~ > ~..s g. ~'"!;;] 5 -i:) <lJ 1;1 ~ ~ i:) ..s a ..s i:! ~ g...s c.8 i3 ~ .6..s <lJ ~ e ~ ...c
~ .0 ._ <+-< '.j:l --:-- . -0 ::l .... "!;j > ..s ~ !";: >. -0 ~ "3 ~ .- .ra tIJ ~ tIJ g. 8 -0 i:)..o <lJ ~ 1ii tIJ .
o G .... 0 tIJ ~ i:) C gf OIl ~ 'C tIJ _::l \!l gp 1ii u 6 ~ 8 1ii 6 -0 o...g..s B B g.""" &.ra .g
i;o::: 83.!:- 6b" ~ ,g <:.6 -0 ~ - ..0 ~'.j:l' (:l :.E (:l <..=< ... 0 (:l '.j:l c 0 ::l <lJ <lJ 0 ""...; r"\ ~ 'r-
~ i:)...c ::l.... 0 ~ C tIJ ~ s:;: <lJ tIJ .I!l <lJ <lJ <lJ d '" . <lJ ._ '" .... ~ ,f: ... tIJ Po l: .""" 0 ,..
.... "[}J <: 6 0 ~ <+-< eo.El '" C'-. 0.. (:l 0 > .- tIJ > tIJ <lJ <lJ ~ tIJ -0 .... U ~ '" (i3 <lJ d ~ <lJ' 0
g. ~ .6 ~ <+-< -0 0 <+-< ~ 'm o...c C _tIJ >.:E :€j 6$5 6 ;:J -0 ;:J a ~ s ;:J 6 a3 ~.5 <lJ ~.tIJ..s.e ~ J: ~ d::
.... <lJ ....!;: 0 '111 .... 0,- tIJ ~ g .El i:) 0 OIl ~ <lJ -0 (I)> -0 <lJ ... ...c -0 u !il ~ tIJ "!;j...c :: <+-< >. 0.. ~.
o..~G~ o..UtIJ~<lJ'. ~O Z.. d...c 6 6~"'''''6 ~.. ....-O...c<lJd~!;:
=~~O :.E~d2~E~-~~ ] .y~~~!~ "3~~1S~~~~~~....<lJ~<lJ8~
dO....<lJ~tIJ ...c.... o-.:>c 'Q~ o..<+-<.... aUO tlJ8.tIJ'" <lJ0..8~ .~ 0
~ 11>' B...s 1:: 6 i:)" 2~ .~ "g -;: 6 .g J; ~ ~ ~ ..0 0 a. ~ J; ~ -;:.E E] 8. ~ i:) ~ .6 ~ 2 <..=< ~ 6 g. <: ~
o ono(l).-c 0Il~ d <lJw <lJ<lJ~-':> -':>u<lJ ....O~~-O....,f:.-on~ (I)
...c ~ M .... oo.."!;j 1:: 6 'Cii eo ~ u B <+-<0 ~ ~ ...c ~:; ~ 'E ~:.E > ~ ~ a ~ ~'fil g ~ (/) N ~ ~ .... ui .ra
tIJ - d tIJ ~ d .... .- ~ - <+= <lJ.... .... (1)'- .- <lJ <+-< .... .- ~ 0 . ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~
B~>.da~s's;~]~~~~~~~ ~<lJtIJ~I~>~i3~~<lJ~~83o~~o~~fjj~].o
-~~<lJ<lJtIJ.a .... "'00--':>'" -~8.-",~<lJ@U~d-09iil -.:><+-< .~~-e
]J;~~~]C~E1~'~[~j~~~~~~~~"2~~i:)!~gp'~~~~~~'~~i~]~
e 'E d 9 .- ~ d dOll.... >. '" ..Q...c ~ 0 "'<,...c . 0 ...c ~ ...c 0 0.. N ...c ''; gp 0 ::l '.0 C .tIJ 1:: .0 '" i 0 C8
.- ...c ~Po -O~ 0..0 (/)0Il~ (/)~ (/)<+-<(/)<lJ -(/)._.-...c"'''''''S; <lJ 0..
~ ~ 9:l u.ra ~ ' &:l. S o.B M~ -0 ]] ~ .~ <: ~ ~ -..s ~ 0 ~ ~ S 6 ~ 6$ ~ '" 6 c III '3 8. ~ ~ ~ 8 0
~Q-~~~<lJ""- <lJ;g s-ooo-a ...c01;180....0....'" 0 o..d .ci!)"'<,oo~-o..~
<lJ d ....l .0 i:! 'S; ~ g .a tIJ 'S; tIJ.g!";: ~ ~ .g ~ tIJ .g @.g @ .- ~ .g c.8 "~::::!i c.8 b . a ~ .tIJ ~ 0 ;.::
~ .ra ~ ~ ~ ..:.a > 'e g .ra gig, Ii.s; B ~ ~'S; t5 i:) 'S; i:) 'S; i:) ] ~'S; d ~ ~ ~.6 eo 1S i:! ~ ~ o.s ~
~~<lJ~~e~~=.~~~<lJogp8~~.~~8ti~o..eO".3;~~~~.g~~~~t5~~EI
N . 1::8 d 0.. i:) ."[j!5: ~ 08 I:: ~ '0 Cl; <+-< 0 ~ . ...0 . ~ Cl; ~ as g. . ....8 > .'Cii ~ .;;: 5 tr ci >.,....; :5 0
-- ~<:O"N(:l"'.Ml:~ ...c"O~08-oM~Bon"'I.O"'btIJ~~ OOd~<lJ....~-...c-O~
~
i-
:~
u
-<
~
'"
u
on
<+-<
o
~
<lJ
~
i:l;
r..:::8
g <
N on
00 .....
-- .....
..... 0
o
.....
OJ)
= .....
.: ~ c
.~ ..... >
~ ~ ffi
N
cg~
'S: N :;:
.- ~ ~
... ~ <C
< ~ m
QJ::t:t:~
C"I.l ~ CD
~ rJ'}
U~
u ...........
!+:"O 0 0 ~ '(1)
...... r:: ~ ~ (1),..c
~~ ~Q~ ~ ~ .9 ~E~
~I::; "t;j.l:l E ~ ~ 1;j ~ ... 0 u B ....
:> OJ "0 .- .fi' 0 0 <l:: (1) '"
':"t: -g r:: ~ I"'l ~ .~ '.0"0 ~ ~ 0lJ b "3u
OJ OJ ShOd!:+> "0 01= ~r:: OUr:: .~
6 -8 'U; ~ ~.g r:: a ~ 13 ~ c5S..8;:9 fj 8 ii .
~.~ ~On ~ ~ - -.- U,..c> "0
~ "O!;: +> '!il r:: Od {; 13 '""' C"-. 1Jl &l l== 0lJ r:: OJ
gf~ (1)~~<9;=: B'-" (1);3 gf-", !i);Es.'!:!
.~ !il ~ ~ g >'. ~ ~ ~ .i:l .'.o.s ~ ....: ~ ..r:: <l:: E
Ud ~6~'" ~~_~ r::'e~~, ~"OgOlJ ~
;a ~ ~ - > ~ p.. r:: r:: ~ '8 .l5 ._ .- 00 0 :> OJ .- c 1il
- :> 6. 0 0 Od i 0 J.; ;:3 p.. - ..... - ,.. '" I .",
.E p.. ii) ~ '"" .... 0. .!. . "0 '" 8 6 r:: .S a3 0 ,::S @- r::
.(1) >6 .... p.. ..r:: g.....>. ~"''''p..''' 0
(1).-:= . <+=< ~?:l (1) 0lJ 0lJ _ 0 _ 0 ~ (1) o..r:: $,l '.p
:sa '" ~ (1) 0..0 .fi.5 R-'i: p.. >. ;g ~ ;i ~..g ~ a.-:= "8 13
~ ..8 ~. j ~ ~ "t;j @- C\ Jj gf 8"~ (1) 0 'S ~ .r::;::: ~ ~ :a
~g<Ji.g8Z-8 ~~gfr:: ;g"O~~6[g~;~"O !ij<
on >. u _ ~'!il 0'0 ~ '5 :.s 5b OJ p.. 0 ~ OJ (1) , 0 !il r:: "0
~~;s.~.g~ .g~OJ'~ 11~~!]~~~-g~ ,~
"B ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ [ij .~ ~ 8. ~ '5 1 ,~~ 8..9 .9 ~ ~ ~
,~ ;:l ~ ~ ~ ~.5 := gf ~ ~ 0 Sh S 't= -g .E ] ] p... ~ IS. .
OJ ~ 1;j:$ . 6 "0 :E '5 ..r:: (1) . a'Cij 1a ~ ~ ;g 0 r:: ;>, g (1) . ~
~.(1)6.fi~"3 'Cij(1)~]~~~&;:3p..;:3~~~-.fiS~
.- u 0lJ ~ "0 - 0 ';> r::'" .... (1) (1) '" 0 co .... """ r:: - U ;;>
~.- ~ 0 'S: .... ..r:: '""' '50 ~ "0 13"0 "0 0 >. a p.....,..6 c;; 6 E '
~] 6h ~ ;>-..s ~ '5 ~ r:: u _ ';> ';> 0lJ ~ 0).. .- ~ <+=< ..r:: N
'r:: 'Cij6"O~~s~5~.6Bee.Eg~o~~~~gfg~
o~~~..so~(1)OO~u~~p...p...~,;><z~~p...O:Ee~
N~SMo~~~~5~g~~~~~oo~~~O~5gN
_~~_N~~~~U~_O--~~--~ooNNOO-
. ~
i-
's:
-
"
E -<
0 1;l
<l:: oj
u
iJ'
~
'"
u
:s
85
~
~
.~
(1)
~
>
u
.~
;:3
~.....
-g'5b
'" OlJO
....-
C ~~
(1)
~ .g-g
"'<.c:
0 ] .-
U
0 zl
r::
,.... ,.... ,....
0 0 0
0 ~ 0 o~
N ~ ~ ~
-- f-;I
\0 :::8 ..... on
~ ..... ~
--
..... N .....
~ e::
:::8 f-;
on
.....
0
on
OJ
~ ~ ~
5 z p...
0
0 0
(l) (l) (l)
i:I i:I i:I
0 0 0
z z z
,.... ,....
0 0
0 0
~ ~
\0 .....
~ .....
--
- N
,.... ,.... ,....
0 0 0
0 0 0
~ ~ ~
on on on
~ ~ ~
- ..... .....
i:: i::
i:: (l) (l)
.;;: .....
(l) ;>
';;: ~ (l)
:::.:: ' ~ p:::
u 0; ....
~~I (l)
0lJ i:J -
i:I tIl
(l) <lI
.~ ~ :::E
u 0 ....
tIl .!:l 0
"0 -e
; ;>
i:I <lI
~ ~ ::r::
"" N 0
-0 ..... "" 0\
u 0 0 0
t- o 0 0
0 0 0
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
---------..--
,r
..s.
~~~.....")
:.
,,_.:. -..
"r-=' ~..
':.~\. ;;:::
~~~... ~
~~~ ~~~~,~~*~~,,,
..~...,~TE~" "l'
'11"-#
.Conditions Associated With .
Case #: FLD2002-11041
1/8/2003
10:01:31AM
FIRI
Fire Condition Warn NOT MET 12/5/2002 J_C FIRl 12/5/2002
DRAFT CONDITIONS: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
J C
LRRl
Land Resource Condition
Need tree survey prior to building permit.
Warn NOT MET 12/512002 R A
LRRl
12/512002
RA
PNRl Parks & Recs Condition Warn NOT MET PNRl 12/27/2002 DWR
To determine whether Open Space/Recreation impact fees apply, verification is needed on existing structure, specifically
# of hotel/motel guestrooms. Fees are due prior to building permit or fmal plat, whichever occurs first. Contact Deb
Richter 727-562-4817.
4 hotel/motel rooms = 1 residential unit, if 42 guestrooms exist and project is for 11 residential units, credit 10.5 units,
only $100 Recreation Facility impact fee due.
STRM Storm Water Condition HwO MET 1212012002 EES
1) Need Water Quality Calcs(met)
2) Need Drawdown calcs(before permit)
3) Need Subdrain details(met)
SWl Solid Waste Condition Warn NOT MET SWRl 12/612002 TJG
Explain in detail how solid waste is to be handled
TERl
Traffic Eng Condition Warn NOT MET
a)Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
TERl
12/11/2002
CM
Page 1 of 1
CaseConditions..rpt
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Martens, Cory
Friday, December 20,20025:21 PM
Wells, Wayne
RE: FLD2002-11 041/PL T2002-11 004,656 Bayway Blvd.
Traffic - changes made in PP.
-----Original Message--m
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Friday, December 20,20021:12 PM
To: Albee, Rick; Bertels, Paul; Carrier, AI; Colbert, Joseph; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Martens, Cory; Melone,
Donald; Parry, Mark; Richter, Debbie
Subject: FLD2002-11041/PLT2002-11004, 656 Bayway Blvd.
Revised plans are in. A copy is on the cabinets behind my desk next to Rm. 216. Please come by and take a look at
the re-submission. Your comments from the 12/12/02 DRC are below. Please revise your comments in Permit Plan
as appropriate and let me know via email.
Please review ASAP. This case is scheduled for the 1/21103 CDB meeting.
Thanks, Wayne
11 :20 a.m. Case: FLD2002-11 041 and PL T2002-11 004 - 656 Bayway Boulevard
Owner: Gus DiGiovanni.
Applicant: Bayway Townhomes, LLC.
Representative: Roland Rogers, Rogers Beach Development.
Location: 0.67 acres located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately x feet west ofx.
Atlas Page: 285A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development (1) approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback
from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and
from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and
building), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to walkway), under the provisions of Section
2-803.C; (2) approval for an eleven-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601 and (3) Preliminary Plat
approval for 11 lots.
Proposed Use: An ll-unit attached dwelling project with docks.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Wayne Wells, Lisa Fierce, Frank Gerlock, Glen Bahnick, Joe Colbert, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Deb Richter,
Bill Morris
ApplicantlRepresentative: Roland Rogers, Patti Stough, Leo Govemelli, Gus DiGiovanni
The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments:
1. Plannine::
a) Revise application to show all property owners and the correct names of the property owners. DiGiovanni
Partners - Bayway LLC has only a 35 percent interest in the property. Application is unclear as to the
ownership of the other 65 percent interest in the property. There are jive partners scattered across the
world; will provide incorporation papers of LLC and documentation showing DiGiovanni as managing
partner and Rogers as signa tor - Planning will check with legal on this;
b) Affidavit - provide relationship of Augustino DeGiovanni to DeGiovanni Partners (partner, president, etc.).
Ensure application and affidavit match as to owner.
c) Signature on application is that of Roland Rogers, yet the notary is stating that the signature is of Augustino
DiGiovanni. Is the notary not verifying whom is signing the application correctly and by providing on the
notary statement that they have provided an identification (such as driver's license) or being personally
known to the notary?
d) Provide on Sheet 1/1 of engineer's plans the proposed height (dimension) of the building from the FEMA
NGVD 11 feet elevation to the roof deck. Also provide same height on building elevation drawings sheet
A-2.
1
e) Provide on Shal the typical driveway width by a garage. .
t) On Sheet 1/1, please take off the existing development so as to better see the proposed improvements.
g) Provide on Sheet 1/1 in the Land Use Data the square footage and percent of land area of the paved
vehicular use area.
h) Provide on Sheet 1/1 in the Land Use Data the square footage and percentage of the vehicular use area for
interior green space (required is 10 percent if vehicular use area is less than 4,000 square feet or 12 percent
if more than 4,000 square feet).
i) Provide on Sheet 1/1 in the Land Use Data the percentage of lot area for existing and proposed conditions
for building coverage, paving, sidewalks/pool area and open space.
j) Unclear as how unit owners will get to pool and docks. Ifbya sidewalk, ensure such sidewalk is included
in the site data. Will be using paver stone and grass
k) For a one-way traffic flow, driveways are designed at a 20-foot width, which is too wide for one-way flow
and too narrow for two-way flow. Narrow driveways to a maximum of 16 feet (should increase side setback
on south side to pavement). Applicant has done - recalculate the dimension
1) Show visibility triangles at the property line, not the back of curb (Engineering and landscaping plans).
m) Any proposed signage or outdoor lighting? Show or state.
n) Note: Building Code requires an 18-foot setback from the seawall. Proposed pool encroaches into this
Building Code setback. May need to re-engineer seawall.
0) Preliminary Plat - show all proposed easements.
p) Curb all landscaped areas with six-inch high concrete curbing for the protection oflandscaping from
vehicular encroachment. Show sidewalks from front entry door.
2. Traffic enl!ineerinl!:
a) Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
b) Backoutldrive aisle dimension shown as only 15' where 24' is the code required minimum standard for 80
degree angle parking - revise to meet standards prior to D.O. Patti met with Mike Quillen who confirmed
this was okay
c) Show appropriate one-way signs and markings prior to D.O.
d) Revise access driveways to meet 24' minimum standard width prior to D.O. need to get confirmation in
writingfrom Engineering
e) Indicate on plan how parking requirements are being met prior to D.O.
t) Glen will discuss these issues with mike quillen.
3. Stormwater:
a) Need Water Quality Calcs - prior to cdb
b) Need Drawdown cales - prior to cdb
c) Need Sub drain details - prior to cdb
d) Per Leo G. - awaiting geotech report - some things may change pending this; calculations with reflect
3/4inch requirement; grading plan may need to be modified; ifpond changes in elevation, may need to
adjust grades to make them work; Glen will ask the city's drainage engineer to contact Leo.
4. Solid waste:
a) Using black barrels that need to be taken to the curb; any access to get the barrels to the curb (can use the
driveway) will need to be shown on landscape plan
5. Parks and Recreation:
a) To determine whether Open SpacelRecreation impact fees apply, existing structure information is needed,
specifically number of hotel/motel guestrooms. Fees are due prior to building permit or final plat,
whichever occurs first. Contact Deb Richter 727-562-4817. there are 42 guest rooms now- need some
documentation on this
6. Landscapinl!:
a) No comments
7. Land resource:
a) Need tree survey prior to building permit. Palm trees are protected that have 10 foot of clear trunk; any
trees within 25 feet of the property line need to be shown as well.
8. Harbor Master:
a) Proposing 10 slips; no navigation hazard, pushed out to avoid obvious sea grass
9. Fire:
a) Show a Fire Hydrant Assembly with a Fire Department Connection within 40 feet of the Hydrant on the site
plan, prior to CDB (on same side of the street).
b) Show the Fire Line to the riser connection at Dock Area on the site plan, prior to a cdb.
c) DRAFT CONDITION: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
10. Environmental:
a) Need submerged aquatic vegetationlbenthic survey from qualified biologist. seagrass bed is directly off
seawall- will need have more information about the location of existing aquatic life when discussing the
seawall changes and docks - how will these areas of concern be handled? Survey was done and will be
2
11.
provided
General enl!:ineerinl!::
a) Need to construct a new 6" water main loop in order to provide fire protection. New main to be constructed
in right-of-way, prior to building permit (will tie and loop with 674 bayway - will coordinate with project
at 692 bayway)
b) Water meters to be installed at right-of-way line, prior to building permit
c) Minimum sidewalk width is a 4 ft. - to be located one foot off property line - there will be more room for
landscaping - will be doing four-foot sidewalk; consider adding xeriscape Oasmine, ground cover) to the
area along the curb
d) They want to do a four-inch sewer line for service connection
.
.
3
PLT2002-11004 COMMENTS:e e
a) Should the "common area" adjacent to the right-of-way and Lot 1 have some sort of frontage along the right-of-
way?
b) Bearings to be shown on all property lines.
c) Title, ...etc. to be shown.
NOTES:
* 15 sets of revised plans, application, etc are due. to Planning by Friday, December 20th for review by CDB on
January 21, 2003
* Email comments to Roland Rogers atrir02ers16(i:V,aol.com <mailto:rir02ersI6(i:V,aol.com>
4
~
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Richter, Debbie
Friday, December 27,20022:58 PM
Wells, Wayne
RE: FLD2002-11041/PL T2002-11004, 656 Bayway Blvd.
Revised comment below noted in Permit Plan:
To determine whether Open Space/Recreation impact fees apply, verification is needed on existing structure,
specifically # of hotel/motel guestrooms. Fees are due prior to building permit or final plat, whichever occurs
first. Contact Deb Richter 727-562-4817.
4 hotel/motel rooms = 1 residential unit, if 42 guestrooms exist and project is for 11 residential units, credit 10.5
units, only $100 Recreation Facility impact fee due.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Friday, December 20,20021:12 PM
To: Albee, Rick; Bertels, Paul; Carrier, AI; Colbert, Joseph; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Martens, Cory; Melone,
Donald; Parry, Mark; Richter, Debbie
Subject: FLD2002-11041/PLT2002-11004, 656 Bayway Blvd.
Revised plans are in. A copy is on the cabinets behind my desk next to Rm. 216. Please come by and take a look at the
re-submission. Your comments from the 12/12/02 DRC are below. Please revise your comments in Permit Plan as
appropriate and let me know via email.
Please review ASAP. This case is scheduled for the 1/21103 CDB meeting.
Thanks, Wayne
11 :20 a.m. Case: FLD2002-11 041 and PL T2002-11 004 - 656 Bayway Boulevard
Owner: Gus DiGiovanni.
Applicant: Bayway Townhomes, LLC.
Representative: Roland Rogers, Rogers Beach Development.
Location: 0.67 acres located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately x feet west ofx.
Atlas Page: 285A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development (1) approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback from
15 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet
to seven feet (to building), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building), a
reduction ofthe rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to walkway), under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; (2)
approval for an eleven-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-60 I and (3) Preliminary Plat approval for 11
lots.
Proposed Use: An ll-unit attached dwelling project with docks.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Wayne Wells, Lisa Fierce, Frank Gerlock, Glen Bahnick, Joe Colbert, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee, Deb Richter, Bill
Morris
ApplicantlRepresentative: Roland Rogers, Patti Stough, Leo Govemelli, Gus DiGiovanni
The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments:
1. Planninf!:
a) Revise application to show all property owners and the correct names of the property owners. DiGiovanni
Partners - Bayway LLC has only a 35 percent interest in the property. Application is unclear as to the ownership
of the other 65 percent interest in the property. There are five partners scattered across the world; will provide
incorporation papers of LLe and documentation showing DiGiovanni as managing partner and Rogers as
signator - Planning will check with legal on this;
1
Affidavit - pro. relationship of Augustino DeGiovanni to De.anni Partners (partner, president, etc.).
Ensure application and affidavit match as to owner.
Signature on application is that of Roland Rogers, yet the notary is stating that the signature is of Augustino
DiGiovanni. Is the notary not verifying whom is signing the application correctly and by providing on the
notary statement that they have provided an identification (such as driver's license) or being personally known
to the notary?
Provide on Sheet 1/1 of engineer's plans the proposed height (dimension) of the building from the FEMA
NGVD 11 feet elevation to the roof deck. Also provide same height on building elevation drawings sheet A-2.
Provide on Sheet 1/1 the typical driveway width by a garage.
On Sheet 1/1, please take off the existing development so as to better see the proposed improvements.
Provide on Sheet 1/1 in the Land Use Data the square footage and percent ofland area of the paved
vehicular use area.
Provide on Sheet 1/1 in the Land Use Data the square footage and percentage of the vehicular use area for
interior green space (required is 10 percent if vehicular use area is less than 4,000 square feet or 12 percent if
more than 4,000 square feet).
Provide on Sheet 1/1 in the Land Use Data the percentage oflot area for existing and proposed conditions
for building coverage, paving, sidewalks/pool area and open space.
Unclear as how unit owners will get to pool and docks. Ifby a sidewalk, ensure such sidewalk is included
in the site data. Will be using paver stone and grass
For a one-way traffic flow, driveways are designed at a 20-foot width, which is too wide for one-way flow
and too narrow for two-way flow. Narrow driveways to a maximum of 16 feet (should increase side setback on
south side to pavement). Applicant has done - recalculate the dimension
Show visibility triangles at the property line, not the back of curb (Engineering and landscaping plans).
Any proposed signage or outdoor lighting? Show or state.
Note: Building Code requires an 18-foot setback from the seawall. Proposed pool encroaches into this
Building Code setback. May need to re-engineer seawall.
Preliminary Plat - show all proposed easements.
Curb all landscaped areas with six-inch high concrete curbing for the protection of landscaping from
vehicular encroachment. Show sidewalks from front entry door.
Traffic ene:ineerine::
a) Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to e.0.
b) Backoutldrive aisle dimension shown as only 15' where 24' is the code required minimum standard for 80
degree angle parking - revise to meet standards prior to D.O. Patti met with Mike Quillen who confirmed this
was okay
Show appropriate one-way signs and markings prior to D.O.
Revise access driveways to meet 24' minimum standard width prior to D.O. need to get confirmation in
writing from Engineering
Indicate on plan how parking requirements are being met prior to D.O.
Glen will discuss these issues with mike quillen.
2.
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
1)
m)
n)
0)
p)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Stormwater:
a) Need Water Quality Cales - prior to cdb
b) Need Drawdown cales - prior to cdb
c) Need Subdrain details - prior to cdb
d) Per Leo G. - awaiting geotech report - some things may change pending this; calculations with reflect
3/4inch requirement; grading plan may need to be modified; ifpond changes in elevation, may need to adjust
grades to make them work; Glen will ask the city's drainage engineer to contact Leo.
Solid waste:
a) Using black barrels that need to be taken to the curb; any access to get the barrels to the curb (can use the
driveway) will need to be shown on landscape plan
5. Parks and Recreation:
a) To determine whether Open SpacelRecreation impact fees apply, existing structure information is needed,
specifically number of hot ell motel guestrooms. Fees are due prior to building permit or final plat, whichever
occurs first. Contact Deb Richter 727-562-4817. there are 42 guest rooms now- need some documentation on
this
6. Landscapine::
a) No comments
7. Land resource:
a) Need tree survey prior to building permit. Palm trees are protected that have 10 foot of clear trunk; any trees
within 25 feet of the property line need to be shown as well.
8. Harbor Master:
a) Proposing 10 slips; no navigation hazard, pushed out to avoid obvious sea grass
3.
4.
9. Fire:
2
a)
Show a Fire HYdra.ssemblY with a Fire Department connection.n 40 feet of the Hydrant on the site
plan, prior to CDB (on same side of the street).
Show the Fire Line to the riser connection at Dock Area on the site plan, prior to a cdb.
DRAFT CONDITION: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
11.
b)
c)
Environmental:
a) Need submerged aquatic vegetation/benthic survey from qualified biologist. seagrass bed is directly off seawall
- will need have more information about the location of existing aquatic life when discussing the seawall
changes and docks - how will these areas of concern be handled? Survey was done and will be provided
General em!ineerin2:
a) Need to construct a new 6" water main loop in order to provide fire protection. New main to be constructed in
right-of-way, prior to building permit (will tie and loop with 674 bayway - will coordinate with project at 692
bayway)
Water meters to be installed at right-of-way line, prior to building permit
Minimum sidewalk width is a 4 ft. - to be located one foot off property line - there will be more room for
landscaping - will be doing four-foot sidewalk; consider adding xeriscape Oasmine, ground cover) to the area
along the curb
They want to do a four-inch sewer line for service connection
b)
c)
10.
d)
3
PLT2002-11004 COMMENTS:
a) Should the "common area" adjacent to the right-of-way and Lot 1 have some sort of frontage along the right-of-way?
b) Bearings to be shown on all property lines.
c) Title, ...etc. to be shown.
.
.
NOTES:
* 15 sets of revised plans, application, etc are due to Planning by Friday, December 20th for review by CDB on
January 21, 2003
* Email comments to Roland Rogers at riroe:ers16allaol.com <mailto:riroe:ers16allaol.com>
4
rinellas County Property APp.r Information: 1729 1505004001 O.
Page 2 of5
17 / 29 / 15 / 05004 / 001 / 0150
09-Dee-ZOOZ JifTI SfTlith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:Z9:48
Non-Residential Property Add ress. Use. and Sales
COfTIparable sales value as Prop Addr: 656 BAYWAY BLUD
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t : Z60.0Z
sales frofTI 2000 - 2001:
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac / IfTlp
Plat InforfTIation 9 /Z.OOZ lZ.Z03/Z.140 460.000 (U) I
1955: Book 038 Pgs 038-039 9 / Z. OOl lZ.Z03/Z.159 345.000 CU) I
0000 : Book Pgs - 9 Iz.ooz lZ.Z03/Z.188 345.000 (U) I
0000 : Book Pgs - 9 /Z.OOZ lZ. Z03!Z. Zl 0 805.000 (U) I
2002 Value EXEMP T IONS
Jus t IMarke t: 1.970.000 HOfTIestead: 0 Ownership 1 .000
Historic : 0 Use 1: .000
Assessed/Cap: 1.970.000 Tax ExefTIpt 1: .000
Other ExefTIp t : 0
Taxable: 1.970.000 Agricul tural: 0
2002 Tax InforfTIation Land InforfTIation
District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Bay
Clear",ate r View:
02 Millage: u. Z911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: 45.883.47
1) Z40 x lZ0 45.00 Z9.154.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HofTIes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2002 taxe6 will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
45.883.47 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exefTIptions, Total Land Value: 1.311.930
2002 taxes will be :
45.883.47
Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. 5 BLK A. LOTS 15. 16. 17 AND
Description 18 AND RIP RTS
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1. us/htbinlcgi -scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/9/2002
PIne lIas County Property Appr.r Information: 17 29 15 05004 001 01.
Page 3 of5
17 / 29 / 15 / 05004 / 001 / 0150 :01
09-Dec-ZOOZ Ji~ S~ith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:Z9:48
Co~~ercial Card 01 of 1 I~prove~ent Type: Hotel/Hotel < 4 St
Property Address: 656 BAYWAY BLUD Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39
Structural Elements
Foundation
Floor Syste~
Exterior Wall
Height Factor
Party Wall
Structural Fra~e
Roof Fra~e
Roof Cover
Cabinet & Mill
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
Partition Factor
continuous Footing
Slab on Grade
Cone Block/Stucco
o
None
Hasonr9 Pillar&Steel
Gable 8c Hip
Celllent Tile
Ave rage
Carpet COlllbination
D r9 lIIal I
o
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fixtures lZ0
Bath Tile
Electric
Shape Factor
Quality
Year Bu i It
Effective Age
Other Depreciation
Function Depreciation
Econo~ic Depreciation
Floor and
Ave rage
Rectangle
Average
Wall
1. 956
ZO
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 14.608 7) .00 0
2) Open Po rch .30 4.760 B) .00 0
3) Utilit9 .40 144 9) .00 0
4) CanoP9 . Z5 75 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Commercial Extra Features
Description Oi~ensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) SHUFBDCT 600SF 150.00 Z 0 1.500 999
2) PATIO/DECK 500SF Z.50 500 0 500 L 915
3) ASPHALT 4 ZOOS F 1. 00 4. ZOO 0 4.Z00 999
4) POOL ZOX40 Z5. 000.00 1 0 10.000 L 915
5) DOCK Z4 OS F 15. 00 Z40 0 Z.990 1. 996
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 19.190
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
[B~[!][!]~~
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/9/2002
e
e
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
January 21, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.rn., in Commission Chambers, third floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola
Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishinl! to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetinl!. Those
cases that are not contested bv the applicant. staff, neil!hborinl! property owners. etc. will be placed on a
consent al!enda and approved bv a sinl!le vote at the bel!inninl! of the meetinl!.
1. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Decade SO-XIV (Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC) - flexible development approval to
increase the height of a building with attached dwellings from 30 feet to 149 feet (as measured from base flood
elevation), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C, and to reduce the
buffer width along the north property line from 10 feet to 5 feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the
provisions ofSec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: 146 attached condominium dwellings, 8 attached townhome dwellings,
120-slip marina [73 public slips and 43 slips reserved for condos] and 7,500 square-foot nomesidential uses
[restaurant/ship's store/marina office)) at 900 North Osceola Ave., J.A. Gorra Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-3; Sue Barco Sub,
Lots 1, 13-14 & 22-23; and F. T. Blish's Sub, Lots 1-3 & 8-10. FLD2002-10036. (TO BE CONTINUED TO
DATE UNCERTAIN)
2. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Peter J. Hunt. TRE - flexible development approval to terminate the status of a
nonconforming structure to permit an existing 18.5-foot rear/waterfront (east) setback (to building) where a 25-foot
setback is required, under the provisions ofSec 6-109. (Proposed Use: Existing detached dwelling with an 18.5-foot
rear setback to building) at 849 Harbor Island, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 6D, 7 A, 7C, Lot 44. FLD 2002-
10034
3. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc. - flexible development application to revise a
master site plan previously approved by the City Commission in 1995 and subsequently amended by the Community
Development Board in January 2000 and October 2002, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
including the following requests (" indicates previously approved site development standards as part of the original
Master Plan and subsequent amendments by the Community Development Board):
· Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building)";
· Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to pavement)";
· Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)";
· Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to existing auxiliary shop)";
· Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing Powell Cancer Pavilion)";
· Reduction in front setback along Druid Road from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement).;
. Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement);.
· Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building);.
· Reduction in front (east) setback along South Fort Harrison Avenue from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement)";
· Reduction in front setback along Magnolia Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement).;
· Reduction in side (east and west) setback along the Pinellas Trail right-of-way from 25 feet to five feet (to
pavement)";
· Reduction in side setback along all other sides from 25 feet to 15 feet.;
· Increase in height of a parking garage from 50 feet to 59 feet.;
· Increase in height of a medical clinic from 30 feet to 45 feet.;
· Increase in the height ofa hospital building from 50 feet to a maximum of 103 feet..
(Proposed Use: Changes to an approved Master Plan including improved stormwater facilities, the addition of
property enlarging the campus, the replacement and/or enlargement of seven buildings and the addition of three
parking garages) at 300 Pinellas St., Sec 21-29-15, M&B's 12.01, 12.02, 12.03, 12.12, 12.15,21.01,21.02 & 21.03;
Magnolia Park, Blk 35 Lots 1-9 & Lots 14-22 and E 10 ft ofa 60 ft abandoned RR right-of-way; Magnolia Park, Blk
38, Lots 1-8 inclusive and 1/2 vac street N, Lots 15, 16, 17, 18-22 inclusive; Bluff View, Lots 16-26 & E 31 ft of Lot
27 and less 10ft vac alleyadj on Riess E; Milton Park, Blk 5, Lots 1-6 & N 1/2 vac alley adj on S; Milton Park, Blk
7, Lots 1-7 and vac alley between Lots 2-7 and N 1/2 vac alley adj S of Lot I; SJ. Reynold's Sub., Lots 1-5 & N 20
ft of Lot 6, Lot 7-9; J.B. Roberts Sub, Lots 1-2 & 1/2 vac alley on E less road. in NW comer SD Lot 1, Lots 3-5 &
7-11 inclusive and vac alley between & pt unnm lot ofPorns Park lying S; Porns Park, E 93.68 ft of unnumbered
tract S of Pine lias Ave & N 1/2 ofvac St. on S; Petzold Gulf View, Lot 3 & part of Lot 2 & 4; Turners AC Add to
Milton Park Blks A&B & 1/2 vac st on N; Heart and Vascular Pavilion, Commercial Condo - Common Elements;
Westover, Blk A, Lots 1-22 & vac rds on E & S; Westover, Blk B, Lots 1,2,3 and Lot 7 and W 14 ft of Lot 6 and
Lots 8-17 & vac Pinellas St. adj on N and Lot 4 of Barnes, W.N. Sub, Bluff View Court E 18 ft of Lots 1,7,9,11,
13,15,17, 19 & 20 W for road, All of Bluff View Court sub including right of ways less 18 ft for Reynolds Avenue
right of way and unplatted land adjacent on W, and Westover Blk B, Lots 4-5 and E 39.3 ft of Lot 6. FLD 2002-
10035
4. Beach Motel Manal!ement (The Moorings Townhomes) - flexible development approval (I) to permit attached
dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to 3 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), a reduction of
the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of See 2-803.C; and (2) ofa 6-slip, multi-use dock, under the provisions of Sec 3-601;
and preliminary plat approval for 6 lots. (Proposed Use: A 6-unit attached dwelling development with a 6-sli, multi-
e
-
use dock) at 620 Bavwav Blvd. (The Moorings I), Bayside Sub No.5, Elk A, Lots 9 & 10 and riparian rights. FLD
2002-11039/PLT 2002-11003
5. Cotel. Inc. (The Moorings Townhomes) - flexible development approval to permit attached dwellings with a
reduction of the front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from IS feet to 3 feet (to pavement), reductions of
the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from
10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement) and from 10 to 2 feet (to pool deck) and a reduction of the rear (north)
setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Sec 2-803.C and preliminary plat approval for 6 lots. (Proposed Use: A 6-unit attached dwelling
development with an existing 6-slip, multi-use dock) at 674 Bavwav Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, BIk A, Lots 19 &
20. FLD 2002-11038/PLT 2002-11002
6. Bril!htwater Investment Establishment (Angelika Marocordes) - flexible development approval for attached
dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building)
and from 10 feet to 6 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building)
and from 10 feet to 6 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building)
and from 20 feet to 0 feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way,
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C and preliminary plat approval
for 10 lots. (Proposed Use: A lO-unit attached dwelling development) at 161 Bril!htwater Dr.. Bayside Sub No.2,
Lots 14-16 inclusive. FLD 2002-11042/PLT 2002-11005
7. Gus DiGiovanni (Bayway Townhomes, LLC) - flexible development approval (I) to permit attached dwellings
with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback
from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), reductions of the side (west) setback
from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement and building), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to
walkway), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) for a 10-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Sec 3-
601; and preliminary plat approval for 11 lots. (Proposed Use: An II-unit attached dwelling project with 10 docks)
at 656 Bavwav Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 15-18. FLD 2002-11041/PLT 2002-11004
8. Burnabv Welch Corporation - flexible development approval for attached dwellings with reductions of the front
(south) setback from 15 feet to 5 feet (to dwnpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to 9 feet (to staiIWell), a
reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from
10 feet to 5 feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to staiIWell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway) and an
increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet (as measured from base flood elevation), as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: A I5-unit attached dwelling
development with an existing II-slip dock) at 692 Bavwav Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 21-23. FLD
2002-11 043
9. Carlouel Yacht Club - flexible development approval for the construction ofa commercial dock (10 feet by 250
feet floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to 6 feet,
under the provisions of Sec 3-601. (Proposed use: A 10-foot wide by 250-foot long floating dock [adjacent to
seawall]) at 1091 Eldorado Ave., Mandalay Replat, Blk 171, Lots 6-11 and part of Lots 4 & 5. FLD 2002-10033
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the
Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the
Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such
purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review
by interested parties between the hours of 8;30 a.m. and 4;30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of ClealWater, PlalU1ing
Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., ClealWater, FL 33756, or call (727) 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
PlalU1ing Department
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, ClealWater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE; Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500
FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REOUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL OFFICIAL RECORDS &
LEGISLATIVE SERVICES WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093.
Ad: 01/05/03
e
~~ D ;00.:2
It / ;,:?o:;I
I/O?!/
IIOOt
/+1
./4f
{!.t-~~,<!-tUfl 7f;:.L 13e.ffC.# A- 5.5.-/
1.5;:l1 ~dCl'-IP\Je.
C (eaV-u..XL+erj r-: L 33707
FLINT IMP FUND TRE
C/O WELLS, JESSE
2919 WEST BAY DR
BELLEAIR BLUFFS FL
~3~S770 2621
KAI_'4t.l, BRI(~H (~
f.;J.',U~N, .:rOf"Nt.~E 1"1
530-540 GULFVIEW BLVD
CL.E(4F:VJ{iTER FL
:3Z~,76"1r
KOUMOULIDIS, VAlEHTINOS
1050 OY3TERWOOD 3T
HOL.LYItJOOD Fl..
::':3019 4:'341
dOOF< I NG3, THE
9100 BAY HILL BLVD
ORL(il'!DO F'L
~32819
COTEL IHC
67 '1 Bf4Y1tJ(4Y r3L \lD
CLEAF,~(i,!i0, TER FL
:~)~)767' -2601
FLETCHER, HARRIET K TRE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD PH 4
CLEf4RltJf4TER FL
:3~316'? :2677
I.,(WI)AS, DnnTFWS
L(.lVDf4S, TH(-\LII4
724 8AYWAY BLVD ~ A-2
CLE(.iF<\,J(iTEP Fl..
~)::)7 (~'1 2611,
HOUGEN, THERESE Y TRUST
124 13AY1fJAY BL.VD
CLCI:'FI\'.IATEFI FL.
;5~37 67
DETTY, G WILLIAd TRE
IVErlSON, E;FlITT L
C/O BANK OF AMERICA PRIVATE
PO DO>< 479
CLEi-lF!\IJATEF< FL 8 J 7/;7 0 <{1'1
?~ y~: '7 r::. ''''j" ('~ ...., -? 0:::::'
Sf<.TEL II'IC
678 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CI...F,:nl'lI~)(.\ TEn FL.
-:5:5767 ~~642
e
IC-O(;;' I!!.. e.:) I3r::.A C!-II ":b;:..v t::..t.. (;1 ~ H /E.N r
7? o. a"y' h1~ L.
(!R-j ~ TPrI-. 1.3 iZAC.III F I- .3'-1(" gl
~IV'U U'I C",,'ICL
\ "f?50 Go If- B i Ijd
C (a).Jf"u:;c\Jer 1 Fe
.4 Ss-v'
.i:l I D ;)..
337(, '7
FL INT IMP FUND TRE
C/O BEL CREST CONDO INe
706 1:':("'y'I,;.)n\( BLVD
CL.E:I~iRW(.lTEI~~ FL
3~)761 2609
BAYWnTCH SUITE:S INC
600 8(1\(\',,1,:,:\' ElI_ VD
Cl..E'~lR(i,.II1TEfl FL
::~~;:?)7 6 7 2601
o
DT GIOVANNI PARTNERS-BAYWAV
C (~P FI I E R (-',_. 81:\ ".,." 1.,.1 A Y
165 131lYSIDE DR
Cl..Eil,RI,~f~ TECh: FL.
33"76"7
BURNABY WELCH COFlP
6';~2 8n'y'lA!(:~"'( t3LVf)
CL.E:,;FI\',I(iT!:OP r"L.
;55)<,::::,} 26f)1
ANTHONY, Cnl1IG W
ANTHONY, BARBAnA B
724 8AYWAY BLVD ~ A-I
Cl_E(.if"liJf;TEP FL
5~576'l 2: (J.l1.
c:: f~~:3 ["/ '" Fl f-i l..J L. :':::~ r::::'
124 8nYWAY BLVD U A-3
CL.E(il~I,i..lnTI::f,: !"'L
33767 :26,.1.2
snUNDEPS. WILLIAM R
SAUN()ERS~ SHIRLEY M
724 8AYWAY BLVD n B'-?
CLE:IlRV,I,'),TEh: F"L
:5?S76"'/
3f<:TE,L Tile
618 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CI_E(;lPll'!"~ TE:n FL
33767 26,42
e
CENTER FAMILY LTD
C/O AMERADA HESS CORP
PROPERTY TAX DEPT-09439
o r.,1E: HESS PLf~Z"~
lilIOOOl3rnOGE NcJ 070Q/[ /.:J;Z1
,""', -7 ,.--..{-:\ r.:: 1 J~~ "'} (",
SlEF:. US,," IHC
655 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CL,E{lRW;:~TEFI FL
3.37(:,7
AHASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS
POLITIS, GREGORY C
630 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CL.EAf;~II>.I(lT[R FI,
~;;;:5767
CAPELUTO FAMILY PTNSHP
C/O RO~'. (~ND ~., 'l)(
28050 I", !e; ',jl, !~'{ 19 I',j STI:: 10
CU::{~F<:I/' r " '\.f:.
;53 'jf 61 _:::~600 "
SHEPHARD, WILLIAM M TRE
C/O EASL~Y MCCALEB & A3S0C
619 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CI.E(,RI.~IAT[R FL
33767 L~64?:)
ALPHA BEACH RESORT INC
645 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CL,E(IRI,,\)(\TEI~ Fl..
~~; ~s '7 1,::,1 7' 26. 4 ::3
ALDINGER, GUEHTER
ALDINGER, DAGMAR
SCH\.li;L.BEI'I(l,,1EG 4
74395 MUNDELSHEIM
OEFlrl{,N'{
GflF?Ljl[,j[), :J EF I'
G(',RL(.\ND, FEZ I .][:
640 BAYWAY BLVD ~ 103
CLE(,F?I.,I(',TER FL.
~::.)37'67 2603
LINARES, ANTHOHY
640 BAYWAY BLVD I 105
CL_Ei;Rv,.I,,~ TEn Fl.
~)3'? 67
e
CLEAnWATER. r. Y OF
PO 80>< 414'"
CU:;:~Rli!(Yr' ~ FL.
ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS
ANA3TASOPOULOS, HELEN
1600 GULF BLVD I PHNO
CL,.E{4r~liJll,TEP FL
337 () '7 2'::;)7:5
CAPELUTO FAMILV PTN3HP
C/O nOLL.~'r~.!D F<O><
28050 US HIOHWAY 19 N STr: 10
CL.Er;PI,.\lrC1TEr:1 F'l~
5~)-l61 2600
POLITIS, GREGORY
965 S BAYSI~ORE 8LVD
SAFETY HAPBOR FL
:5 4 (~9 .~:,~ ,q. :2 ,J. )'
ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS
ANASTASOPOULOS. ANA3TASIOS
630 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CLEAF:I,v{\T[P fO!,
3257(."'/ 26lt.2
LEHART, T[D TRE
LENART, MAPIA TRE
LENART FAMILY TRUST
625 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CL,E(\R1i.I('rTEF, F'L,3370'7
. ':1'" ,.~.. ~^,' ...- -'''J' ....... .,- J': '--;,
},pf3
SEAWAKE MOTEL LTD
691 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CI_,[(~P\..,I(,T[:FI FeL
:;::57..:.,,/ '264:;)
I:: 8, (I Ne
1600 GULF BLVD # PHI
C:LE':AF:hl(I'fEf;: FL.
:~)3'l{;,7 292,(1
BAYWAY SHORES CONDO
~4~:; :;3 ["! N C
PO HDX 38:~:~~~2
CL.EI~,f,I...I(\T[F: FL
:3.3)'67 8882
ZAREMBA, THOMAS S
L S[AGATE STE 999
I'OI..eCrU OH
4~)604
GIAMMATTEI. CAROL
GIAMMATTEI, GUIDO
640 BAVWAY BLVD # 104
CI.E(\f,Ii..I(\I'Ep FL
~5 :~.; 7 '::,, '/ 2 (, 0.3
SHEFFIELD, MARGARET C
SHEFFIELD, JAMES S
640 BAYWAV BLVD # 106
CLEr>,r:,:~.'JAI'E::r;:: Fl
2;3767 :;:::60,:::~
e
e
HrC)NKINS" ,JOHN ~j
640 BAYWAY BLVD # 201
CL.E~)f~I,I,!i.)TEFl FL
DE 'VO:3" ROBERT
PO BOX 476
CL.Fi~lRlto!nTER FL
TF:'[
3:3767 2606
~3.:57S7' 0/1-'"76
.JnNIS" JOHN
10300 S LON(:, A'VE
(H.\ f( LA (l.n.J I L
CONRAD" RONALD J SR
:)1)1 r,Oj'!NE:.T DI;1
E(:\;H [)[JElUqUE Il.
6.102'.5, 9.~;:12:3
604S~S 4'~,4,2;
WAGNER, WILLIAM H
WAGNER, .JOSEPHINE C
559 LORING VILLAGE CT
OFlfiNGF P()pt< E'L
ElAL.I<Ii'J, Jr~l.iES ii
640 BAYWAY ElLVD # 206
CL.E(\F:~~lli:jT[:R r~l.
~:; 20 '7 ::5
~:;3)r(:,1 26(),4
PUSSELL, SHELDON P
1415 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN
55120 1002
MC MULLIN, DONALD J
Me MULLIN, MARGARET U TRE
500 .JOHN F KENNEDY EllVO ~ 62
!,',IILCII,IJ(JOD HJ
OS2'60 .~~i,e.:) 1
1/1).] I C, GROZD"lN
3321 SAWMILL VALLEY DP
MIS3ISSAUGA ON L5L 3C9
C{.)j.,!ADA
MOSCA" ANTOINE C
jvi03CI~" L.I',Nr>, L
1875 MCCAULEY RD
CL[~(:\PI,l,JfiTEP FL
3576.r:~, 1512
I,'!ODD:S, [',iOEL. D
640 BAYWAY BLVD # 305
CLI?(.iPli,I(~ Tf:r~ FCL
FOLEY, BETHANY A
F(JL.FY" .JOHH P
640 8AYWAY BLVD U 306
CL.[(\PI,iJATE:R FE
:::;;S"/ !~:J "7 '260.5
:525'?"(::,";r 26 (),!:,
VU,] Ie" VEnA
640 BAY WAY BLVD ~ 303
CLJ~ARI,..}(nEf~ FL
~3:376 I' 260.5
BEL CPEST CONDO INC
"7 0 I~.S, E~; (:~ y IIJ ('I 'y' E3 L. V D
CL_E(lf~\'J(\T[P FL
~)2)767 2609
WARNER HOSPITALITY
706 BI~YI,i.J(~Y ElL VD
CL.E(\RI,i,Jf~ TEFl r"L,
::-:;3761
\(
r T\.
3376
;53767
~~~:i~*~ili~ ITY
:S3761l/\/ r
3:,3761
WARNEP I OSPITALITY
7.1)6 r...._'~fn....I,i".JY.'~ f3L'..:')
CL.E,'~I:~1,i. () - ':r~\)"L
:::;~316 7
e
e
11\/
35/67"
n
:525761
~3;:. 'l (, '7
TROPICAL pnLMS DEV CORP
106 B(.','y'\,)t~Y DL VO
CL.E(~r~INIC) -r'EF~ I'''L.
CL.EARWATER POINT TOWNHOUSE
COHDO (lS:'::N
716 n/Yv",I,!r:lY DC.VD
CL.Et',f'(I'.1r:lT ER FL
::S::5'/' 6 7 2(~09
3('5"76'7 2(1(,1~l-
HAHSELMAN, MARGARET M
206 P(lL/'H::TTO RD
CL.EIC)r:;~1/1tlT[r? F'L.
3::S7.S6 ,14.30
MASSElL, GEORGE M II
716 DAYWAY BL.VD W 2
CLE(lRI,.I!(\ TeH FL
:-:; 2)"76 "/ '2 (:. (,.4
Me GEE" JOHN P
PO BOX ::;'455
CLEARWATER BEACH FL
2)~5167 8455
HORi'.iE" rr-/Oi'it)S L
F:)(J f:30X ~~()09
CL.EAf?~"t,TCR Fl.
~:;2)76'7 8009
ROANE, DOUGLAS C
116 DAYWAY BLVD I 5
CU::r::1F(v,)I'rTER n.
BESSINGCR, ROBERT N
BESSINGER, ELAINE A
716 BAYWAY BLVD N 6
C L.. E ('I f~i 1..\1 (~ T E F;~ r:' L
3;57 67 2(")~(:}4
:53167 2664
BENDERL.Y, lVI TRE
a 75 '/1 [.':ND r;VE
i'J. E 1,1,1 YDr~K NY
.10025 ,'j919
tIHOFiOSO, [)i:,N I EL
(\i'jOh~OSO., ,JE.t\N
201 WILTSHIRE RO
\I.,IYNN[\',IOOD Pf~
19()(}6 32):::;2
KAMINSKAS, STEVEN W
KAMINSKAS, LEISA
4r<.:1-60 HAI.',1TH()r~NE
[3[H3EHV'ILLE IL
60106 ;5;543
SP"',Gt'II]L.~cl "JOHt'l
SPAGNOlA~ ROSALYN (~
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD W ?04
CL.E:flf~\.\'ATE:F;~ i'''L
3:;516'7 2(><1,(':~
DE VITA, MICHAEL J
DE VITA, HEL.E:N C
224 I<.ELLY BLVD
STATEN [SLAND NY
10:514
CONTINENTAL TOWERS INC
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 206
CL.E()r~I,I,!A TEl";; FL
:.$ .::' 7 6 '/ 26 /1. ~:>
HOLT, DOUGL(.\S
HOLT, SUE [
2245 Si HI,'JY 1/
CRE:SCENT CITY FL
Dt,LE:f.! .., P()UL..I NE
'J(~L.[N., PHILIP
2:59 N HILL RD 8 203A
f~I)DISON It..
(,(J101
:522.1.2 (')608
Fir:~PP, PHILIr;' J
675 S GUL.FVIEW BLVD # 301
CL.Ef~Fil,lJr:~TEFi FL.
::53767 2(~46
CICCARELL.()~ LAIJREN'T S
CICCARELLO, JUDY
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD W 302
CLE(~FI\\I(\ TE:F:' F;L
:).~5"76,7 7:(:)/1.6
.
.
MONCRIEFZ, J SCOTT
MONCRIEFF, SUZANNE S
S TOi.'IOI<(.4 V I El,,1 DR
CIF<I"jOND BEf1CH FI_
:52174 ::5135.1.
CHIAPPA, JOSEPH M
HO()\iCP, FOR,'~Nh F?
67S 8 GULFVIEW BLVD n 304
C:L..E"~RI~!(lTEP Fl_
::;::S ),. 6 .../ ~:: 6.4 E:.1
1'~(1LL.r-:)S., LE'I_r-:l
4 F!:AY VIEI~! eln
~;t\L.EM t1i~)
01.970 2()~30
51.IE ,.....1 (.~, i'iM~C:U H
ClIF'I, i.1i~SUM(Cl A
675 S GULFVIFW BLVD n :500
CLE()PI..\I(.-" TER f~L.
~5~~I'l6'/ 2()5)"
**********
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD I 307
CL.E(.~RI~.I(~ TEFl FL.
PE::TF'Il<', 1:.:CJi'.!~n(~1i"CF' IRE
675 5 GULFVIEW BLVD I 308
CI_.E(~lRI~.lnTiO:R FL
~53767' 21:',57
~5:;) "'if 6, '/ ~;:~ (. ~:~! "7
t11:'ilo:l~, Jf1rlES IIJ
11E:YER, 1_ I NOt, f<'
675 S GUL.FVIEW BLVD # 40J
CL..E(.~Flv..I(~ TER fOL
hUDER, RICHARD C
hUOER, JOSEPHINE M
1324 COf3BLE:R LN
(C\I"L.[:NTOI~.IN PA
li3.104 9220
;S~3)t61 2657
OFSTEDnL, IRVIN J
OFSTEDAL, L.UCIL.LE
675 S GUL.FVIEW BLVD n 403
CLj:"(ir~~\I(HE:rl F'L
I..'!OLEE" .JOHi-1 i"i
~SOl ERIE: I~VE
TAi'1F)I~ FL.
33'767 2657
331:';,0(;,
'NEG, i<(~lF?I...
'^'EG., r1f~R I f~'
1501 GULF BLVD I 807
CL.[()F-?W{iTER rei"
8CHnFFER, GEORGE A
675 S GULFVIEW BL.VD # 406
CI...E:,:,H('!(ITCF, FL.
33767 2':)03
~5:~;I(,7 2657
vJ"~Z I 0" I RENE
\h.lAZIO, EUGEl'-!E
5511 8 KOMlo:NSKY 81
CHICAGO 11_
60629 4415
1([':1... T\', .:"'ii'1E8 5R
Il<EL, T\( ~ 3tl:::;;f~t\!
Y,)9,'j. Nt)P I ER rID
CliNTON 1'.11
4~3.1(37 4628
LOVITZ, ~UL.IUS L TRE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 501
CLE('\Pv.!(~TEF< E'/"
l'h:.I CE., T I f'1 E
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 502
C L. E: ie', R '/.! :':1 T 1: F,' f" L.
:~3~376 7 2(:;.5'7
~3371:.' "/
7C1EFI" NORI3EF,~T G
lEIER, MARGAF<ET E
675 S GULFVllo:W BLVD # 503
C'-.E,'~f-?'N(',TER 1"1.
CW,Fif31S" (.,i'rnIOI'f','
GARBIS, ANTOINETTE
204 8 V:UH, 81
HI NSD()I.E :r L.
605?1 40.'12
3~~L'll,<_) '? 266:.6
BOSTI"Oi"i, EH I f(
SUNDQUIST, BRITlA
IV(.~R mc;PGERS VI'iO
"1;'\06:5 H I I~D{.)S
SVJEDEN
i'''1 0 r:~ E: L L., 1 :'1 i"'i p, F~ "t' I~)
675 3 GlullFVIEW BL.VD # 506
CI...E(.lf"I,.I(I.fEH i"L
2;:::576)'
BL.AKELY, JOSEPH E TRE:
BL.AhELY, BnRBARA TPE:
921 \hJC)RCHESTER
f"EHTON MI
I.l8430
BE:Rf(OVSKY, PETER
BERKOVShY, HELGA
675 S GUL.FVIEW BLVD ~ 508
CL r:ARlio}{',T1:R FL.
~~;~:;"l6.? 2666
snRBER, WILLIf1i"i R
BARBER, BARBARn N
675 OULFVIEW BLVD I 601
C L [(~ F\~ (1,1 rCi T E: F,~ I" L.
i"iARINI, DOROTHEA
675 S GULFVllo:W BLVD I 602
CL.EnPIt.!(~r[R FL.
::3~;76'? 2(,(S6
::337(),? 2(;,6.::,
.
.
ORGETTAS, MICHAELrRE
74 CENTR(~L ST
PEI'lElODY t1A
0191:,0 43.57
ALBER, VIRGINIA L
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD . 604
CI_E,'1F~I,'!!:\TER I"'L
~:r.::S.l' 6 7 26(.6
Rt:,MSF:'(" CLAlf"( ..J
RAMSF:Y, BARBARA M
1406 SAINT GOTTHARD AVE
!~HCHOFi(~GE {.jl<'
CUNNINGHAM, IRENE A TRE
675 S GUlFVIEW BLVD . 606
Cl,E!'IRI,,\!!\ TeR FeL
~.)9S08 ':;,052
~~;7;7'61 2666
VL!\HOS" EL,clINE
:YZ 11(.\PLE c-n
WEST B(.lBYLOH NY
:L1704 Tl12:
CONWAY, E P LAM LTD PTNSP
PO [:OX :53.Ll'3
ElO{.\RDi1,,;i'.! DH
445L5
C,f~GUFi 1 CH" ,JOHN
GRGURICH, KATICA
5021 W CAROLl AVE
SI<'OKIE: IL.
(~~0077
MISKEL, ELIZABETH V
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 702
C;L.EARli.l!iTEF~ FL.
3:~;167 2()il"7
CHAMBERS" LARRY W
CHA1"iBE:RS" {4HN r1
C;O CAPITOL TRAVEL SERV
4929 l"iONON{4 Df~
1'11\0 I ~::()i'I ('JI :5 3 7/~ cl b 3 i
r1 I CHACL, (~HN 1'1
7041 BRIDGETOWN RD
CI1,!CINi',!!-jTI OH
4S24(~; 2()()S
L""~: ~J::.7 'i L ").~ -z /i
l"jOFiAITIS, CHFI.I:3T
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD W 705
CL,E(.~IF!I",It:ITER FL
PANUTHOS, PANIAGOTTA TRE
675 :3 GULFVIEW BLVD " 106
CL_E(~RI,\I(:j -r EI=< FL
~5~5161 26.47
337()"/" 26(.::1-7
I<.F~ I T I CDS" SAt-j
KRITICOS, CLIZABETH
757 i'1!4NDAL,,'W
CLE{~FIV\ll'iT[R FL_
ZEFELIPPO. MARIA R
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 708
CL.E,:AFi\'..II\ TEF! IO'L
::;;~~7'6 7 1(~.33
3:';;1.:S7 :?,~,l~7'
l-i{4F~T I i'-!" G~,FI.Y t1
MARTIN, BERNICE J
1046 {:\RDEN DR
\lILLi~ HILL.S I<.Y
410J.1 3727
KELLER, ELIZABETH M
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD I 802
C;L E{)R\\!(~ TEl=< f'L
;5~)76~/ 2(,,-:~1
ORLDPP" 1':,i'.IITA 1'1
675 S GULFVIEW BL.VD I 803
C:LEnR~~A TE:I=< FL
NM;I;S. i'1ICHE:'Lli.,E:
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 804
CL I:: Ij R Iii {\ TEF~ I~L.
::;~:~;16l 26t'j.7
2);576'7 2647
SCiFiOI, FI.,'1LPH 0
SGF~OT" LAUFiA J
2781 ST ANDREWS BLVD
TARPON SPRINGS FL
25468n 6:312
F' (I H Fi, \/U.U:: u'n' E
P{~IFi:F"(, L,Ut..,!['( A
5633 OAKL()ND DFI.
T (;~MP(\ f'l,
5:56,17 7711.3
MC DONALD, ROBERT J
[viC DON(;~L_D" MMiY
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 807
CLtc:I,""R",.I(~TER Ft__
CI._OI,\)., cue; I Cf<. P
JOHNSON" MARGUERITE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD I 808
CLC(.~h:I.,\I(~TER FL,
:3:3767 26-78
2'5:'::;7(~",7
RUSSC'" f<,AFl.EN 6
RUSSO, ANTHONY J
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 901
CLEI~F:W!~ TEr;~ BEl'jCH FL,
GCJFl.OOi'.J" (.!(JBI_E L
3306 SAN DOMINGO ~)I
FL.,
~S3l6I
,-
e
e
B,ClF<HIERE: "
BEl_nNCE:p,
1.65 B~lYOU
r1{lF!QUETTE
i.1 I CH(lEI_ :r
J T I~L R
ST
m
IHUN" E:LLEN M FAMILY TRUST
C/O NASSIF, JANET
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1005
C:L.[(lRI,\I(\ TECf" r"t..
4985.:~~ 910J
"3:3;)r(.7 2645
BEr~t.I[T f" .JOYCE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 905
CL[{lRl",nTECF< FL
33'767 2(:;,78
VALSAMIDES, GEORGE
VAL,SAMIDES~ GEORGIA
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 906
CI.[(':I;~I/I('i TEF: FL.
:S:Sl(,7 ?()'7C~
BRADLEY" FELICIA N
122 COUNTRY CLUB DR
,]!iC/<,SONVI L.l_E NC
.;:e546 0142
POLEMENAKOS, SOTIROS
POLEMENAKOS, fHEOHARI
352 ATLANTIC AVE
H('lF:ElL.E:HEl'iO r1(-1
() 1. 9lll:::, :2' ''73?
FWY" ,]CJf.iN [I,
FWY, ,J(,NE S
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 1001
CL.[r~FiW(lTI:::F;: FE.
PIlU..S., BYF:1.0N f)
PALLS [l,EATRICE K
3206 HOE[IT f:~D
T {~j....1 P (~ r;:' L
:s :~':; (, .1. E~ 16 ,1. 0
:3?;7(:,.7 2678
GRACILLA, RANULFO V
(m!iC I L.LJ1, r1,; Fl"l f<.
302 CLAY FURNACE RD
~:;;H'~F!PSVILLE PI~
16150 :5:104
HENDERSON, NEVETA
EISELEIN, ELIZABETH
675 OULFVIEW BLVD ~ L004
C: L.. E: 1'1 F: 'i! (,T c: R E" L.
::S3'767 :264.:)
NASSIF, FREDERICK J
1\!{iSS IF'" J (:\I-.I[':T L
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD W 1005
CL.[(',Rl"'(\TEP F'L.
DOULAS. CARIFALIA
304 HUNTSMILL BLVD
SCARBOROUGH ON H1W 3CB
C I~' i'.! f~, 0 (.~
?;~~;7(S 7' 264E,
SCL I t'i(),J" I SUF
WILLIAHSBRIDCE STATION
PO [;0)< 961
I3f;:Of'~>< I'!Y
10.::::~67
HAYWOOD HARGARE] R TRE
1150 eTH AV[ SW n 701
L(iFiGO F"E.
3~57)O
OOI'iE,1." P SCOTT
CiOi'jEZ" M(~nY L
2719 OSMUNDSEN RO
t'iADISON '/J1
Me KERPOW, DONALD C TPE
675 S GULFVICW BLVD n 1102
C E.. E I':' R V,, ("IT F: P F I~.
.5371.1. .5249
::~!.::.'? () 7' 2(,45
D()f'I.t'iEH, ,:r!~i"IE::::; J
DOF~t'iEF;:, DOF~ I S ,J
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD W 1103
CL[{iFll^,(~ITEFi E'L
BARBIEHE, ,JOYCE L TRUST
.155 E:A'/C:rU ST
;"j(ll'"OUE:rTE i'1 I
4985E~ 91()1
331(,] 26t.l5
EE COHPTE,,, LENp.,
152 HIC,HL(li'ID ST
BUCKE:'lE E.(iKE OH
4.~~;OOf3
SILVERMAN, DIAN[
2121 BATHUPST ST n 620
TORONTO ON M5N 2P3
CAI'.!I:\DA
l'IUBEr:;~" NflNCY E.
?71019 BRIDLE PD
CE. OOf1F I [L.o f'1 I
~:i-e~3()4 1~()09
E.FE., i'jr;DYt'IE ::;
90:3 1,,\I(llJj~CC:
1_E:ITC::Hr" IEE.D 1<',/
42''754
DUDA, NICHOLAS JR
DU[)!i" f1(my ,]
675 GULFVIEW BLVD S U 1201
CLE(.1F~\IJ(Yn::R FL
i'i[Sl'.jO,~,~P, COHP
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD PH <
C E.I': (l R (",) I~ T F:' F~ FL..
3~S1IS, 7 2619
::S:51(~7 26'77
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
August 24, 2004
Mr. Bill Woods
Woods Consulting, Inc.
322 Ridge Road
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
Re: FLD2002-11041 - 656 Bayway Boulevard
Dear Mr. Woods:
On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with eight conditions the
above referenced case, which was a Flexible Development application (1) to permit attached dwellings
within the Tourist District with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to
pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to
seven feet (to building), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and
building) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to walkway), as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; (2) for a 10-slip
multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-60 I; and (3) Preliminary Plat approval for II lots.
A proposal has been submitted to reduce the square-footage of deck area, the width of slips and the length
of slips, while adding one additional slip (new total number of slips is II) than that originally approved
under the Flexible Development case. The approved dock square-footage is 1,422.5 square feet, whereas
the proposal is to reduce the deck area to 1367 square feet. The approved length of the slip catwalks is 20
feet, whereas the proposal reduces the catwalks to IS feet in length. The side setback requirements of
24.6 feet will still be exceeded, close to or the same as originally approved (31 feet on east and west).
In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be minor revisions
and are approved. These minor revisions must be shown on the site plans and building plans when
submitting for building permits.
Should you ha
I
4504. /
questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner, at 727-562-
J
, I I
'Lis~ 1. Ierce '.
\~jistant Planning Director
S:\Planning Depal'tmentlC D BIFLEXi/nactive 01' Finished ApplicntionslBayway 656 Bayway Townhomes - Approved\Bayway 656 Minor
Revisions Letter 8.24.04.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HOYf HAMIJ:rON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, CO~\MISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD. COMMISSIONER * BlI.i.JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL E!vlPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
f
..
,
. .,
.-
~~l!~~
$;~"~~~
,~i:it\,\II/ #, ~~
~~... ~~
"''-:: ~ -=--- ~S
~~ ~~
-:._~~~{~~~
~~~Jl~'tf~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
January 28,2003
Mr. Roland Rogers
P.O. Box 676
Crystal Beach, FL 34681
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2002-11 041/PL T2002-11 004 - 656 Bayway Boulevard
Dear Mr. Rogers:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application (1) to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District
with a reduction ofthe front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions of
the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to
building), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and
building) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to walkway), as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C;
(2) for a lO-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601; and Preliminary Plat
approval for 11 lots. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application
with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoY[ HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BU.LJONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
'.
I
January 28, 2003
Rogers - Page Two
3. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed contalmng wording
warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
4. That covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an
administrative level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
5. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building
permits;
6. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
7. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks; and
8. That all storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (January 21,2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall
be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of
time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect
of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case
expires on February 4,2003.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.c1earwater-fl.com.
~:~
Cynthia Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
Cc: Governale Engineering Services, Inc.
Bill Woods
IIMS5c\PDSIPlanning Departmentle D BIFLEXIlnactive or Finished ApplicationslBayway 656 Bayway Townhomes - ApprovedlBayway 656
Development Order. doc