FLD2002-11039
.
.
CASE #: H-iH,,&1~-I* 0 ~C;
DATE RECEIVED: ~.1 J 2-
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): t,..Jl
ATLAS PAGE #: ~.rA
ZONING DISTRICT: .,...-
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: KFi-f
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
; Clearwater
u~
~
Planning and Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
J
rf
ri
SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans
SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ J'"2.-CS-. C'O
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 3/29/01)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: The Moorings Townhomes, Roland Rogers, Agent
MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box 676 Crystal Beach, Florida 34681
PHONE NUMBER: 512-0468
FAX NUMBER: 789-2982
PROPERTY OWNER (S): Beach Motel Management, Inc. a Florida Corporation
(Must include ALL owners)
MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box 676 Crystal Beach, Florida 34681
,
, i
: I
_.1 t:,
I
rJ\,
. -"'-~i~-''7--,
; t \ / l I;~ . ,\
"-"iil
t. I
L i
;,
"
ACENT NAME: Roland Rogers
DEe 1 9 2002
-.-/
PHONE NUMBER: 789-4372
FAX NUMBER: 789-2982
't'"'o#"',
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS: 620 Bayway Boulevard (The Moorings I)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 9 and 10 and RIP, Block A, Bayside Subdivision No.5
PARCEL NUMBER: 17/29/15105004/001/0090
PARCEL SIZE: .33 acres; 14,577 square feet MOL
(Acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: Six (6) townhomes above enclosed parking (3 stories total) with related new dock structures
(Number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (S): Front setback reduction from 15' to 3'; side setback reductions from 10' to 5' to the building itself and fro
10' to 1.8' to the pool decking; rear setback reduction from 20' to zero feetfor the walkway along the seawall and 10' to the proposed in-
ground pool and to allow construction of new multi-use docks,
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _X_ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
.
.
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it s
located. See Exhibit "A" attached.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof. See Exhibit "A" attached
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use. See Exhibit "P(' attached
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Exhibit "A" attached
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
See Exhibit "P(' attached
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties. See Exhibit "A" attached
o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTCRITERIA (as applicable):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards. See Exhibit "P(' attached
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.) See Exhibit "A" attached
;j.
'lInin lilt::
Ive InTlII
riSe permmeo I" u '" ""y or
. ::iee t:.XlllulL ,..
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. See Exhibit "A"
attached
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. See Exhibit "A" attached
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
v.
.v
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Exhibit "A" attached
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Exhibit "P(' attached
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit "A" attached
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary. See Exhibit "A" attached
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required;
o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY.
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
."
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines.)
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 1 0'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) and color rendering if possible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
,"
.
.
P . REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) (color rendering if possible);
o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Yo X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
I. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/Section 3-1806)
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 Yo X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
K. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
des ri d in this application.
~,,\\\IIIIIl"IIII.
~,""'~~a p..nn Hqt:/I,~
*' <:::)'0 ........ 'FJ' ~
~ ..;;.~\SSION~.. ~
~ ... CJ(j {...'~s\ 15,.?,-, ~.. ~
~ ~~ va 'r;. -. -::.
(1). :
ature of property owner or rei t;ntative... .::
~ t; ~. #CC863281 .: ~ g
~/\. !J. ~ .,!?:~
~"""1>.' ;':'0 onded<<1 'I>~r!P'.l~ ~
~ J- ';..Y Fain.ln51l1 ..\ "':S'
~'IIPBLic.S1~~~ ~"~-.;
""",i """"''''
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I H-
worn to nd subscribed before me this ~ day of
e- e-r-, A.D. 20 O~ to.---Jllf1 ~
. . r e--€-, who is ~y known haS>
as
Notary public, 1\ \
My commission expires: "'\\...~~\-
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
Exhibit A
The Moorings I
Written Submittal Requirements (Section 3-913. A)
1. This site is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass district. The land
coverage requested is consistent with surrounding properties and in many cases,
less than that of existing structures as this area consists of more intense mixed
uses such as high-rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and retail uses.
The proposed three (3) story residential structure is consistent with the scale and
bulk of adjacent and surrounding residential properties and will be less intense
than that of the existing overnight accommodation use.
2. With the demolition of existing buildings on site and the construction of a new
Mediterranean architectural style townhome building and the proposed tropical
landscaping, the value of the subject property will be significantly upgraded as
well as the values of surrounding properties. This proposed redevelopment of the
subject site will not only encourage refurbishing of other surrounding uses, but
will encourage new development within the area. This three-story townhome
proposal is in harmony with the Beach by Design program as Strategies for
Revitalization calls for the conversion of this area to three and four level
townhouses and time shares.
3. The proposed six-unit, single-family townhome use will create less of an adverse
impact to users of the area than the more intense existing motel use on site as the
site will be occupied by long-term residents (homeowners) as opposed to transient
tenants.
4. The minimization of traffic impact being generated from the site is realized by the
change in occupancy from motel use to single-family. In addition, the proposed
driveway area will allow vehicles on site to have safer ingress and egress to and
from the site by allowing users ofthe site to drive out onto the right-of-way in lieu
of backing out.
5. The majority of the immediate vicinity consists oflow scale motel buildings built
in the 60's and 70's with non-uniform signage. This proposal eliminates all
signage on site and provides for a more desirable Beach by Design project.
6. The proposed development will enhance the visual character of the neighborhood,
increase surrounding property values and shall not be a negative impact in regards
to acoustics and olfactory issues as a more intense commercial use may be. On-
site lighting will not adversely impact surrounding properties as all exterior
lighting will be limited to individual "coach-type" attached fixtures for each unit
and low density residential lighting around the pool area. No spillage onto
adjacent properties will occur.
1
.
.
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria
1. This site is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass district. Currently the
site is developed with a two-story motel building, pool area and wood decking
along the seawall. Additionally, there are several accessory buildings on site
consisting of a pump house and two sheds. The proposal includes redevelopment
of the site with a six-unit, three-story townhome structure, pool and retention area
and new boat dock structures. The applicant is proposing to construct mid-level,
luxury townhomes compatible with the Beach by Design program. The proposed
floor plans consist of individual enclosed garage parking on the first level with
two floors of living area above. A minimum of six (6) townhomes of the size
proposed is needed to make this project financially viable. The proposed side and
rear setbacks are consistent with other uses in the vicinity. The proposed front
setback of three feet will allow for an adequate two-way drive area, providing for
safer ingress and egress to and from the site and garage units. Currently, asphalt
parking areas extend into the right-of-way. The requested zero foot rear setback
reduction will allow for easy access to the proposed boat docks. Additionally, a
10 foot rear setback is requested in order to allow for construction of an inground
pool. A residential project of this caliber would be difficult to promote to
potential homeowners without having a pool on site.
2. The proposed residential use will likely enhance property values in the area by
providing new, quality, residential construction and significant landscaping on
site. Per the property appraiser's office, the existing value is $825,000.00. The
proposed development will significantly improve the value of the site to
approximately $3,000,000.00.
3. The City of Clearwater permits attached dwellings. The proposed three-story
townhome project is consistent with the Beach by Design program.
4. The proposed six unit single-family residential townhomes are compatible with
the surrounding land uses as many of the neighboring motels maintain long lease
tenants. Additionally, the infill of the proposed single-family use will allow for
less traffic congestion within the area which will be a positive impact for
surrounding uses. Also, Strategies for Revitalization call for the conversion of
this South Beach/Clearwater Pass district area to three and four level townhomes
and time shares.
5. At this time, properties are not readily available for this type of upscale, single-
family, waterfront, townhome development within this immediate desirable area.
The proposed development of this site is consistent with the Clearwater Beach by
Design program.
6. The immediate vicinity of the subject parcel will be upgraded aesthetically not
only by the architectural design of the new townhomes but also by the proposed
landscaping. The reduction of transient tenants within the area will also be an
improvement.
7. The proposed development will playa role in the continuous positive changes of
Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a newly revitalized site and
new buildings with long term residents. The proposal will provide on site parking,
thereby removing the need for parking within the right-of-way. The proposed site
2
.
.
'.
plan, inclusive of landscaping, will be a significant improvement to the
surrounding area.
8. The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the
demolition of deteriorating buildings and the construction of an attractive,
residential proj ect. The proposed proj ect reflects the City's vision of a revitalized
Clearwater Beach and is consistent with Beach by Design. The site is generally
unmarketable and unusable without the requested front, side and rear setback
reductions.
9. Adequate, enclosed parking will be provided on site. The proposal, as part of a
Flexible Development for attached dwellings, would require 1.5 parking spaces
per dwelling unit or nine (9) spaces. The proposal includes two spaces per
dwelling unit for a total of 12 parking spaces.
10. The design of the proposed townhome building complies with the Tourist
DistrictIBeach by Design guidelines in many ways. On site parking is being
provided within fully enclosed garages on the first level. The proposal is for a
three-story townhome structure and Beach by Design contemplates conversion of
this area to three to four level townhouses and time shares. The proposed
architecture is Mediterranean in design which will be aesthetically pleasing. The
proposed landscaping will lend in differentiating Clearwater Beach from other
beach areas. The residential design ofthe proposed project will help to create a
sense of a "beach community neighborhood" and the street level of this project
will be pedestrian and vehicular friendly due to the maintenance of all required
visibility triangles. The enclosed garage spaces on site and lack of on-street
parking will also lend to an aesthetically pleasing project in lieu of open parking
areas.
3
~'
.
.
1.
That (I am/,:",e are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s4 of the following described property (address or general location):
f;1-C ~w+t 'p,-vA.
L+-t=~+it)IL l? ~1t4I- I f1- -:5 "3 7 "? .
2.
That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
PD 1414~ '2C_4~
, ,
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application:
6. That (lIwe). the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is tru~_and correct.
I f1
"} ,,'
..
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PlNELLAS
()Before me the undersigned. an officer duly commis~oned by the la
~ ~, J...6 D A personally appeared t) (4, f)
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she
-,''6.'' Cynthia Y Cox
*iW*My Commission CC841141
"'''IF.:"l Expires May 31, 2003
My Commission Expires:
I\MSZlPDSlPlanning DepartmenMpplication Formsldeve/opment revievl\residential infill application2.doc
Page 7 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
"
PROJECT NAME:
MOORINGS TOWNHOMES I
PROJECT NO. :
249
~-'~ ~7----------""'"f:f If: ; 'r
._-~-.,! j
POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA:
~: t;
IX. 1 9 2002 '! ii,
i. i:~i
- I. , I
I .
~ t,_' , ~ :., \ C~ t
((~ ',"\ .~\ ,~
..,......----..-"....----... .~._--"- .......~~_.._.".....-
BOT. EL.=
STAGE AREA AREA STORAGE
ft-NGVD SF AC CF
2.50 41 0.0009 0
2.75 159 0.0037 25
3.00 277 0.0064 80
3.25 395 0.0091 164
3.50 513 0.0118 277
3.75 631 0.0145 420
4.00 749 0.0172 593
4.39 933 0.0214 921
4.50 985 0.0226 1,026
T.V. EL. =
TOP EL.
TOTAL QUALITY CALCULATIONS:
DRAINAGE AREA =
14,577 SF
REQUIRED WATER QULlTY DEPTH =
3/4 IN
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME =
911 CF
PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION =
4.39 FT
AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY =
921 CF
i<-~ A,. q,ffJ -
FL. Pc :ll-lf7Y31
.
.
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
PONDDRAWDOWNANAlYS~
PROJECT: MOORINGS TOWNHOMES I
PROJECT NO.:
249
VOLUME PROVIDED (CF)= 921
BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 4.39 POND AREA (SF) = 933
BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 2.50 POND AREA (SF) = 41
UNDERDRAlN INVERT ELEV. = 1.50
K= 0.09 (FT./MIN.)
lENGTH OF UNDERDRAlI (FT) = 10
ElEV. TOTAl INCR l (AV) HG FILTER FLOW POND INCR INCR
FT HEAD HEAD (FT) AREA TCFM) AREA VOL. TIME
4.39 933
2.40 0.47 2.75 0.87 15 1.18 388 329
3.92 710
1.93 0.47 2.75 0.70 15 0.95 283 298
3.45 487
1.46 0.47 2.75 0.53 15 0.72 177 248
2.97 264
0.99 0.47 2.75 0.36 15 0.48 72 149
2.50 41
TIME =
1,024 MINUTES
TIME =
17.1 HOURS
/<..~,- ,4.. ~
F-L. PE:If lf7'f31
.
.
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NO. :
MOORINGS TOWNHOMES I
249
EXISTING CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
14,577 SF =
11 ,950 SF =
o SF =
2,627 SF =
0.33 ACRES
0.27 ACRES
0.00 ACRES
0.06 ACRES
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
CN=
14,577 SF
11,950 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN =
o SF OF POND AREA @ CN =
2,627 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN =
(LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION, TYPE D)
95.48
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
14,577 SF
11,950 SF OF IMP. AREA@ C =
o SF OF POND AREA @ C =
2,627 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
C=
0.81
T.O.C.=
10 MINUTES
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
14,577 SF =
10,919 SF =
985 SF =
2,673 SF =
0.33 ACRES
0.25 ACRES
0.02 ACRES
0.06 ACRES
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
CN=
14,577 SF
10,919 SF OF IMP. AREA@ CN =
985 SF OF POND AREA @ CN =
2,673 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN =
(LAWN IN GOOD CONDITION, TYPE D)
94.83
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
14,577 SF
10,919 SF OF IMP. AREA@ C =
985 SF OF POND AREA @ C =
2,673 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
C=
0.82
T.O.C.=
10 MINUTES
~_~. ~od
Fl.. fG:II l(7f(~1
98
100
84
0.95
1
0.2
98
100
80
0.95
1
0.2
.
. .
.
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOTS 19 AND 20, BLOCK "A" OF "BA YSIDE SUBDIVISION No~ 5",
ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF. AS RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 38, PAGES 38-39. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
rt
FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN FLOOD
ZONE AE (EL.11) PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 125096 0007 D
MAP REVISED: AUGUST 19. 1991
....-_______".;.a.__--
...",,11I:11'-1 ~55r."""
1'1.1:..::~..I"9."I......:..1'.-....:..T..eJ.....
-=...~
FROM : ~ATTI THE ARCHITECT
FAX NO. 7277333769
Nov. 04 2002 03:59PM Pl
'.,
........
111111 llatti ~bt )!!rrbitett, 3hlt.
-:=:-
\
The Moorings
620 Bayway
Written submittal per Section 3-913.A
General Criteria
\': "
: \ i
\1 \ i .
I I U~
- I
, -hJ.i.
Dr:: ,. /.' 1002
...., I ~ ".
\ ' ~
\ i
~ ~ i I
i l_.~___,' "
.~}~:J.:.\J_~~':' "~~:..~ ~
The Proposed Construction of a'new (3) .Story, (llevel parking with 2stories living' above) is
compatible with the scale and bulk of the adjacent and surrounding properties. Although
Adjacent to to the subject property is a Condominium project, most of Bayway Blvd consist
of Tourist, Le. low scale motel buildings. The majority of which are non conforming FEMA
buildings built in the early 60's and 70's. The land coverage requested is consistent with and
in many cases less than that of the existing structures.
The demolition of the existing buildings and the construction of new Mediterranean
Architectu!aJ Style buildings with Tropical and consciously designed landscaping, and brick
pavers with concrete hard-scope in lieu of asphalt will. increase not only the value of the
proposed project but also the values of surrounding properties when appraised in the future.
The health safety and welfare 'of those residing or working the neighborhood will not be
adversely affected by the residential use of these new buildings as the'current use of motel
. generates more traffic and transient personnel. the stability of single family ownership may
well be an asset to the neighborhood and the Beach community.
The minimization of traffic impact is realized by the change in occupancy from Motel to
single family. The Institute of Traffic Engineer data substantiates the decrease in the number
of doily trips made to and from each parcel. Michal Quillin concurs that the drive
arrangement and the minimization of traffic is not objectionable to his office.
The immediate vicinity (with all dve respect) of the parcel is more "ticky-tacky" in its low
scale and non uniform si9nage.. We have eliminated all signage and are providing a
project consistent with the Clearwater Beach by Design Program.
The proposed development will enhance the visual character of the neighbor hood.
increase surrounding property values and not be negative relative to acoustics and
, . olfactory (bells and smells) other than what the usual single family stereo and barbecue griil
would provide.
-. .-. ......-..... .................-.- ----. .. ----......-
Received: 11/41 2 2:52PM;
.7333769
-> NORTHSIDE4IIrINEERING SERVICES;
Page 2
FROM : PATTI THE ARCHITECT
FAX NO. 7277333769
Nov. 04 2002 04:00PM P2
.r'
........
111111 ~atti 'Otl)e ~td)it2tt, Jl'nt.
-==- '
, .
The construction of Quality T ownhomes will not only be an a~set to the Bayway Blvd
Community, in keeping with the General applicable criterio of the Clearwater Code, but
also is highly recommended within Beach by Design.
l
COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA ,
The redevelopment of the parcel without the decrease in front and side-yard setbacks
would render the cost feasibility of the project (that is the land purchase and the
construction of upscale 1/2 million dollar purchase price units) undo-able. '
. The existing value of the site, and future value is addressed in separate documentation.
The existing properties to the north currently have 5'..()" side yard setbacks.
Front yards are virtually non existent due to the "back onto the street" parking. The front
setback is applicable to the drive pavement not the building. Due to the narrow width of
the site a two way drive is required for access to the garages, i.e. angulation of the building
_ with a one way drive is not feasible. The recommended with encroaches within the front
yard area. The superstructure of the building fac;ade is gently telescoped bacK from 26'-6"
to 32'-2". Creating a break within the 110" street front cis recommended within the Beach
by Design guidelines of Chapter VII.
The use of the property os T ownhomes is not only consistent with the City of Clearwater
Code of Ordinances. but is encouraged by the Beach by Design Document. Truly this
project is in the best interest of the future owners and also the neighborhoods of the Beach
. Community.
The compatibly of Single Family residences with the adjacent Motel uses is best understood.
when taking into consideration the long lease tenants of some o( the local "mom and pop"
motels. There is no mix of use "within" this project, other than the boat docks.'
The upgrade financially, esthetically, and with regard to the heolth safety and welfare of not
. only the adjacent property owners but the City as a whole is evidenced by the Architectural
quality of the buildings, the introduction of fire sprinklers within and the additional fire hydrant
at the dOCK. AIsothe current the site has 18% pervious area. OUf ne~ plan proposes approx.
25% not only pervious but Architecturally Landscaped, area. '
1 e:;~II. <:::AII.1 t:Jrw nOlvJ::' . nIJN~nl~ J:'" ~A.nqR. 7?7H7~~~7nQ . AA r-:nn? 1 ()~
Received: 11/ 4/ 2
2:52PM;
.7333769
-> NORTHSIDE4IIbINEERING SERVICES;
Page 3
.
F~M : PATT I THE ARCH I TECT
FAX NO. 7277333769
Nov. 04 2002 04:00PM P3
..-..
111111 ~atti ~t ~ttbitett, 3!nt.
-==-
The off street parking for this project is being provided by enclosed (2 car) garages below all
the future residences. The individual access drives to each garage range in length from 18'-
20'. A new two- way access drive is proposed to allow for ease of access to each unit. This
situation is a great improvement over the existing parking/back*out spaces that are on city
. right of way. Due to this two way drive, the front yard setback is diminished to only 3'-0" as
opposed to the required 15'.
SETBACKS
We are seeking to utilize the flexible design criteria of a 5-0"(Building) and l' *10" (Pool) Side
yard setb~ck, 3'-Q"(pavement) front yard setback and 0 rear{pavement) setback. We trust
that staff and the Board will appreciate this request in light of the opportunity to enhance
the neighbor hood with a "new b~ldingn project in keeping with the recommendations of
. the guidelines of "beach by Design" . specifically midrise townhomes compatible with the
residential cui-de sacs to the north and south.
Further, the minimalism of this request is realized when looking at the existing storage building
setback of O'..otJ(south) and the exist pool pump house 6'-0" (south). In contrast to the
existing front Building setback of 1.7, the proposed townhomes Building front set back varies
from 26'-0" to 32'-2". The Irregular Front Elevation will delineote the individual townhomes.
, eliminating a monolithic building fac;ade, despite the 110' foot length of the structure.
The rear setback requested is 0' -a", due to the concrete walkway adjacent to the seawall,
providing access to the docks. The building superstructure rear setack is 33' -8" well beyond
the required 20'-0".
Upon initial financial feasibility studies a 'project of 6 townhomes ~ould provide for the best
comfort level for the lending institutions and construction cost return. The reduction in side
. yard setback will allow units of a reasonable interior width of 17'-8"., While 0 16foot interior
width, may accommodate single run stairs and narrow interior spaces, the need for "luxury"
space would not be realized.' .' .
The new front yard will have a 3'-0" green area adjacent to the street creating a residential
neighbor~ood front yard ~nvironment
Rece1ved: 11/4/ 2
''.
2: 53PM; , .333769
. ,.,
FROM : PATTI THE ARCHITECT
FAX NO.
_> NORTHSIDE .INEERING S!::,RVICES; Page 4
7277333769 Nov. 04 2002 04:00PM P4
.<
.-..
IIIIII i}atti '([be ~rtbitttt. ]nr.,
-==-
BUILDING DESIGN
The Moorings T ownhomes are an opportunity for the City of ClealWater to take yet another
small step towards the realization of the guidelines outlined in the Beach By Design
Document.
The Townhomes will be Mediterranean in character predominately 35'3" {mean roof height}
tbll. The introduction of elevotor rooftop access places the peak of the elevator enclosure
at approx. 41 '-4". The building is rectilinear in shape with an inundating fac;:ade offs'et in 2'-
Otland 3'-8" increments. Front Balconies and reGesses add to the shade and shadow of the
front elevation. The Design. scale and mass of the building superstructure is well within
- "quantifiable architecturaltl standards of Beach by Design. .
The human scale of the street front and building/ground interfa~e are realized through the
introduction of individual garage doors and low scale (9'O"AFF) tile roofs. The individual
driveways will have brick paver acce'nts and be of concrete construction as opposed to
asphalt, further indicating the qualify of the total building project.'
_ The materials of the building will consist of Grade level concrete block with a light gray
cementuos color stucco finish. White Doric Columns and'accents of White Architectural trim
will be introduced as linear elements at the intersection of the concrete block stucco first
. . , ' .
floor garage area and the wood frame stucco 2nd and Jr:d floors. The 2nd and 3rd stories will
be a sondy stucco color. A deep burgundy window trim accent color will be introduced
through the use of tile and paint on the window and door surrounds .AII railings will be Black
Aluminum. ' ,
. As stated earfler the irregular fac;ade of the building will not only allow for a delineation of
the individual units but also provide for shadow and contrast on the building face. The
exterior Balconies will further enhance the street foc;:ade bringing interest, utility and fac;ade
offsets. ' ' ',' '
Due to the unique location of the new town homes and the superb view. The roof tops will
be designed to allow foraccess from the second floor balcony via a spiral.stair. The roof top
- will also have landscape areas for fichus tr~es and other plontings. These plantings. will also
enhance the front and rear elevations of the building. .
1 f\~.c1 ~.6.1\I ROY n~IVF. . DUNE".DIN. FL 34698 · 727.733-3769 · AA C0021 03
Woods consJfting
.
Environmental Permitting Marine Engineering Land Planning
December 18, 2002
322 Ridge Road
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
Wayne Wells
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Suite #200
Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520
O)~" 1 '7 :m!'\2
I':!-l., J ,...}I.lU
,.--/
Re: The Mooring 1 Townhomes Proposed Docks
FLD#200211039
"
.
Dear Mr. Wells:
As regards the inquiry by the DRC for the proposed docks to be located at the Moorings 1 Townhomes,
there are no valuable submerged resources such as oyster beds or seagrasses as confirmed by the
surveyor when performing the required bathymetry survey. Please note that, as shown on the plans, the
water depths in the proposed slip area ranges from approximately 5 to 9 feet. At such depths typically
grasses are not encountered due to the inability of light to penetrate the depths. Also note there is an
existing dock that extends greater than 10 feet from the seawall. This dock, which will be removed, has
shaded this area for many years such that seagrasses could not grow.
Should you have any questions, please give me a call.
My regards,
Bill Woods
Woods Consulting
E:\Roger's 620 Bayway Dock - The Moorings Townhomes (062-02)\Rogers Bayway Drive Dock 11 Ltr to Clearwater re DRC comment.wpd
Office: (727) 786-5747 Fax: (727) 786-7479 Email: billwoods@woodsconsulting.org
z
o
i=
<(
:e
It:
o
u.
Z
...J
~
W
Z
W
C)
u.
0:lC:
Wit:
a.. 0
8~
(f)
City o~learwater
Development Services Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756
Phone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576
z
o
i=
c:(
o
o
...J
t-
o
W
...,
o
It:
a..
PERMIT APPLICATION
PARCEL NUMBER /7 / 29 / S /
PROJECT/JOB NAME -r HE" M LJCJ R J IJ 65
PROJECT ADDRESS (;2 tJ /J'/lYIII!1 y 8LVlJ
0500V IJ~ 1/ CJo 9(:)
TtJw/1/ItoI1lt:-'3 n ()C~
ZIPCODE .3 ~707
BUSINESS NAME
PHONE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Sa=:- /f-~cHef'J LtJfJll~4AlTY [)&--fJ
LOT
BLOCKfTRACT
SUBDIVISION
NAME (last name, first);
PHONE
It:
W
Z
~
o
ADDRESS
STATE
ZIP CODE
CITY
NAME
!?Jc/r#JiD tJ I1SJLBtJS~ I
/S2o ~rI/1n;71uttJl(iO J>RI lie-
CLe/t{Lw~ STATE FL
Pi =# /5s86
PHON( 11- ~l'" CJt/31/1
FAXbz7JSSO- 37 0
ZIP CODE 33'7 f; V
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE REGISTRATION NUMBER
It:
o
t-
O
~
t-
Z
o
o
co. NAME ~ L1C. HOLDER
ADDRESS ~DT 5E"LE:l:1E\J ~lt\is TlM8
FAX #
PHONE
CITY
STATE
ZIP CODE
STATE LICENSE #
OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE #
PCCLB #
CITY ISSUED BY
o
~
(')
CD
C
en
CD
o
::J
-
'<
(Single Family Residence, Office, Retail)
mG Dell b1Js~~nce, Office, Retail)
WHAT IS EXISTING BUILDING USE
WHAT IS PROPOSED BUILDING USE <0
NUMBER OF~USINESS UNITS
G
FLOOD ZONE
NUMBER OF STORIES
CONST. TYPE: I II III IV V VI; P or U
BUILDING HEIGHT
SQUARE FOOTAGE: LIVING
COMMERCIAL
GARAGE/CARPORT
OTHER
TOTAL
. .
iF FAX' PERMIT PLEASE ENTER PROPERTY ADDRESS
.
.
NATURE OF
WORK
(Check all Jhat ENGINEERING 0 LAND RESOURCES 0 LANDSCAPING 0 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 0
apply)
BUILDING 0 ELECTRIC 0 PLUMBING 0 MECHANICAL 0 GAS 0 FIRE 0 ROOFING 0
UTILlTIESD OTHERD lJt1cl!5 10 PROU/()E 0 /lJ(Jt;eJI'tJ(:9 5L/{)5
TYPE OF WORK NEW 0
ADDITION 0
REMODEL 0
OTHER 0
DEMOLITION 0
VALUATION
$
/ ~ d6d
ORC
COB
NOT-APPLICABLE ~ CASE # FL or FLS ,
NOT-APPLICABLE 0 APPROVEDD
DENIED 0
(circle one)
DATE:
. Anyone planning to do excavation work, must notify the one-call .CALL SUNSHINE" Notification Center at 1-800-432-4770 prior to any
excavation work being done, in order to prevent underground damage. Federal D.O. T. Regulation Part 192, Sections 192.614 and 192.707.
Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installation as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced
prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction.
CERTIFICATION
I HAVE COMPLIED WITH ALL THE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL ASBESTOS REGULATIONS CONCERNING NOTIFICATION OF THE
PROPER AUTHORITIES OF THE PROPOSED DEMOLITION AND RENOVATION PROJECTS. ' .
WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR
IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY.
IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF
COMMENCEMENT.
I am aware of Florida and Federal Accessibility Codes, and I certify that I have met the requirements of both.
I certify that, this application together with any plans submitted is accurate and represents all work being done at this time. All work will be
done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning and if not I realize I am responsible for the removal of any
construction in violation of these laws or regulations. Any deviation from information submitted, unless approved by the Building Official will
render this permit null and void. :
;'? f4A~ 0 f<Q6~. ~ l6~1
p~/~~~ JD-II-Zoo2-
Date
Signature of license holder
Print name
OFFICE USE ONLY
ZONING
FRONT SETBACK:
ATLAS PAGE
LAND USE
SIDE SETBACK
BUILDING HEIGHT
REAR SETBACK
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (Calculation by the City)
New PermitApplication.doc
rolm ullJ /JUfTaJ .J Y.' t / tL ~1Jj).s
WIJOl1S U(lbU L TJIU&
.
.
~
Application #
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-USE DOCI\: PERMIT APPLICATION
PlNELLAS COUNTY WATER AND NAVIGATION CONTROL AUTHORITY
Please type, or hand print in nLAc/{ inlz
I. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
A. Applicant's Name: -:TM~ MooR, '" ~s TO'PIJHOIY\E::S>> ~~ Ko.9FR.~ } A6s~t.J T'
B. Mailing Address: ? o. i1 k '1 ~
City: Ce'fS'T,-\L. 6~AL\\ State: F'L Zip: ~
C. Telephone No.(s): (7:17) 51 1-- ot./<o8
II. AGENT INFORMATION:
A. Name: -BIL.L WOOl:)S WlJO~~ COf\lSUL-rlfl..l{.,) IIJC...,
B. Address: 3~.P f(, bl..F. Ri:>.
City: PAW\'\ "~RaOR. State: ~ Zip: 3i./~ 63
C. Telephone No.(s): l7.)7) 7B u, - ~ 74-'
III. SITE INFORMATION:
A. Construction Site Address: ~)O BA'IWA~ '8..L.\Jt>.
City: C I F~RW.4IC:.~ ) Fl-
B. Intended Use: '-.J'<.lt5 N' A/IJ AMe-,..,'1'1f Ta (p4./PI-r 1bWl"I~hte- bS-Vl::.L..oPME",c.J-r
C. Parcel ID Number: ~ ~q / IS / tJ>t:JO ~ / Q::) I /oMO
D. Incorporated: (2:'( Unincorporated: 0
E. Previous Permits: NOT KA/bWA'
F. Date applicant assumed pl-operty ownership:
l;l-l.{-q(P
month/year
G. Obstructions: (dogs, fences, etc.) NolJ€
H. Attach 8-112" X 11" vicinity map showing specific project location.
I. All other information pursuant to p.e.a. 90-19 (amended), Section 10.8, as needed.
J. Does the project abut residentially zoned property?
.
Yes 0
No c;;(
K. For projects requiring a public hearing, aUach a copy of the complete legal description.
04B1WO/.rl/ENVMGMNT/ComBOet .lII28I83
1-
.
.
flppl.icalion "
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
DISCLOSUH.E FOH.M
In order to alleviate any potential conflict of interest with Pine lias County staff, it Is required that the Authority
be provided with a Iis[l}g of PERSONS being party to a trust, corporation, or partnership, as well as anyone
who may have beneficial Interest In the application which would be affected by any decision rendered by the
Authority. (Attach additional sheels If necessary.)
A. PROPERTY OWNERS:
Name: THE Mf1DR'~ \";kJl'lHoj\otES:
Address: ROL...""l) Roc.e:~A~e.vy
~ o. Bu. ~7lD
~\(~"tA-L tlE'1K"J fL 'le(~8l
NOllie:
Address:
Name:
Address:
Name:
Add rell8:
B. REPRESENTATIVES:
Name: B,te.. GJoo~) Uoob~ CsN'H'L"AJU) I.oc.
Addre8s: 3,p.fJ. Rl\~(J: R~.
fALN\ ~'" .{)o.? J 1= l.. "3 c../ u, f? ?
Name:
Address:
Name:
Address:
)
Name:
Address:
I
C. OTn~.Jt PEUSONS IIA VING OWNERSIIIJJ INTEREST IN '91E SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Interest is: contingent 0 absolute [3'"
Name:
specific interest held
D. DOES A CONTRACT FOn. SALI~ EXIST FOn. TilE SUn,JECl' Pn.OPERTY?
IrBO, the contract is: contingent 0 absolute 0
YES 0
NO if.
Name of parties to the contract:
E. DOES AN OPTION TO PURCHASE EXIST FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY? YES 0 NO ~
Name of parties to the option:
F. OWNER'S SIGNATURE:
I hereby cer ify that the . lfol"mntion RLnLed nhove is compleLe, nccuraLe, and true t.o the best of my
knowledg
x
~-
Dote
/6-//-0z..
()IM'VO'.'IENllMGMNTICcmIll'-5. 7f'INJ
.
.
.
Application #
IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
MULTI-USE ~ COMMERCIAL 0
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
A Nature and Size of Project: frJ~ Sl.tP MUL.\'-U5€ Doc.K As IvJ A.[{\~fJ(TY TO
A (.o-v/'olvr TOwAJ~V.l~ o~V~LOPME=A.f(-; Pu?t'\r€ SeE" VJFoPH.A,-f/'AJ
CQ,v (Pr-\f-Je& ItV
A'T"lA<::HM(?I\.ITS A t 1?
NO~
Length: . Width:
L R
Square feet:
1../9.2. e
B. Variance: Yes 0
Amount in variance:
Setbacks:
Other:
NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to clearly demonstrate that any requested variances
are consistent with the variance criteria of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control
Authority Regulations. The applicant must submit a written variance request outlining the
nature of and need for any variances. The applicant must demonstrate that a literal enforcement
of the regulations would result in an extreme hardship due to the unique nature of the project
and the applicant's property. The hardship must not be created by action(s) of the property
ownerls). The granting of the variance must be in harmony with the general intent of the
regulations and not infringe upon the property rights of others. The variance requested must
be the minimum possible to allow for the reasonable use of the applicant's property. Should
the applicant fail to demonstrate that any variance request is consistent with the criteria outlined
in the regulations, staff cannot recommend approval of the application.
V. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION:
I, NUT KNowN Al 1H.15 -r1M.f': , a certified contractor,
state that the dock has not been constructed and that it will be built in compliance with all
requirements and standards set forth in the "Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County
Water and Navigation Control Authority, and in accordance with the attached drawings which
accurately represent all the information required to be furnished. In the event that this dock
is not built in accordance with the permit or the information furnished is not correct, I agree
to either remove the dock or correct the deficiency.
Signed:
CCl"t. No.:
Company Name:
Telephone No.:
Address;
VI. OWNER'S SIGNATURE:
I hereby apply for a permit to do the above work and state that the same will be done according
to the map or plan attached hereto and made a part hereof, and agree to abide by the "Rules
,and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority for such
construction and, if said construction is within the corporate limits of a municipality, to first
secure approval from said municipality. I further state that said construction will be maintained
in a safe condition at all times, should this application be approved, that I am the legal owner
of the upland from which I herein propose to construct the improvements, and that the above
state.d agent/contractor,may act as my representative. I understand that I, not Pinellas County,
am responsible for the accuracy of the information provided as part of this application and
that it is my responsibility to obtain any necessary permits and approvals applicable for the
proposed a ivities 0 either private or sovereign owned submerged land.
~ lo/dgZnm'.: R;gn.tm'e
-
.
ATTACHMENT A
PROPOSED 620 BAYWAY BOULEVARD MULTI-USE DOCKS
CITY OF CLEARWATER
COMMERCIAL DOCK CRITERIA
SECTION 3-601C.3.{a) through (g)
(a) Use and Compatibility
The docks will be for the sole use of the occupants of the 6 unit town homes community.
(b) Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities
The dock is designed so as to not create any adverse impact on persons using the adjacent
waterways for recreational or commercial purposes.
(c) Impacts to Navigation
The dock as proposed should have no detrimental impact on users of the adjacent waters. See
item 7 of the Fact Sheet (Attachment B) wherein it is noted that the dock extends only
approximately 20' from the shoreline as compared to the waterway width at this location of
approximately 580'.
(d) Impacts on Marine Environment
As noted by examination of the plans, the dock will have no impact on marine environment.
(e) Impacts on Water Quality
As noted on the plans, the depth of water in the area where boats will berth is a minimum of
approximately 8.0 feet at mean low water. This should provide in excess of one foot of clearance
between the lowest member of a vessel and the bottom at mean low water.
The mooring of 6 vessels at the facility should not adversely impact water quality.
(f) Impacts on Natural Resources
The dock will have no impacts on natural resources.
(g) Impacts on Wetlands Habitat/Uplands
The dock will not have an adverse impact on the adjacent uplands but will serve to enhance the
uplands.
.
.
..
ATTACHMENT B
PROPOSED 620 BAYWAY BOULEVARD MULTI-USE DOCKS
FACT SHEET
AND
DIMENSIONAL CRITERIA
PER CITY OF CLEARWATER
CODE SECTION 3-601C.3.(h)
1. Proposed Use:
The proposed use is a multi-use dock to provide 6 slips for residents of the proposed 6 zero lot
line townhomes. The 6 slips are designed to accommodate boats up to 30 feet in length.
2. Property Width:
The property width measured at the shoreline is 121.4' (MOL).
3. Setbacks:
. The property to the west (612 Bayway Boulevard) is restaurant/cafeteria. The required
setback on the west is 10% of the property width as measured at the shoreline or 12.14'.
Actual setbacks as proposed is 18.5'.
. The property to the east (640 Bayway Boulevard) is a condominium. The setback on the
east should be a minimum of 10% of the property width as measured at the shoreline or
12.14'. Actual setback as proposed is 18.8' .
4. Length:
The dock extends 20' from the seawall which is less than 75% of the width of the property as
measured at the shoreline or 91.05'.
5. Width:
The proposed width of the structure is 85' which is less than 75% of the width of the property as
measured at the shoreline or 91.05'.
6. Area:
The area of the proposed dock is 492.8 square feet.
7. Width of Waterway:
The width of the waterway at the location of the proposed dock as measured perpendicular to the
.
.
shoreline is approximately 580'. The proposed dock extends from the shoreline only 20 · with the
outermost tie piles located at 30' from the seawall.
8. Docks being Removed:
An existing dock is being removed which represents the removal of 1,630 square feet of existing
dockage. ~"
9. Seagrasses
No seagrasses are present in the proposed dock area.
.
.
~J' ~t , .'-Urt\l'
,'~
ISST ~ q6-J]Z72~ .
ofe .'). 1996 7 ; ,np!-~
"PREPAREtl BY "'-NO RETURN TO:
CHeSTeR E. BACHEL,LER, ESQ., '/
HOLLAND "~NIGHT t
J~O~entral Ave~ue, Suite 1500 '
P. O. Box 3542
'-5t'.~peter.bdr9, FL 33731-35,42
.:t
._._~
.. - . _..-
. .
PINELtAS'COUNTY FLA.
OFF.REC.8K q544 ~~. 17~4
.
CORRECTIVE W~"TI DEED
. ~!.c:o~OI"::'
~~.
"afe ...:..-.-.
. '(S.'
01 -
11"1
f.':CS _ ' . d d .. L
"'" _' .between fRANCOISIrGAUCHER, a ma'rn.e ..roman, an JEAN-Pl..RRE BELlS E
pre _. a married IDan, whose address' is 2545 CoachlMn ~oad, Apt.. 194,
at~ -- . - . '. - .
_ =_ ele~nrater, Florida 34625 n GrantOrfl,. and'BEACH ".oTEL H.l\N1.GE)4ERT;--::'
'f(1'I,..i:"t1D- . . " . ,...---.".. .
'INC., a Florida corpora.ticn, of 62~._.~~IlY' Bou.!.e...!.!l.!'c!' ~lellrwater,' '
THIS INDENTURE made this ---1...~ day of l)~","'","J,./',
1996.
. FIQrida,
346,30,
a~d whose 'tax
ideo'tlfiCllt.lon' numbel" 1!
an Grantee.
" I % N S S S.S r B:
That the Grantors, ,for and inconsideration, of the sum cf
$10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is herety
ackn~ledged, hereby grant, bargain, eell, '.~1ien, remii!.!.' releaee,
conY~Y and con~irm to the Grantee, all that certain land situate in
,~
Pinellas.County, Florida, v1z:
. .
.-- ."- . -. .
Lots ~and 10 in Block A, BAYSIDE ~UBDIVISION NO.5, accordill9'
-,-to"thl!:'Plat theTeof~ as recorded in Plat Book 38, }1ages 38 alld
'.l9.r-of.,tl'lePublic Record. of pjnellas County, Florida.
. . . .." _.:. ---- '. .... .
subject: to ,covenants,. restrictions, easement. 'of. recordalld'
taxe.. for the 'C\lrrent. year.' ",) . . .
\.
Parcel Identification Number: 1.1/29/15/05004/001/0090
t.
siid pr:pp~rty is not the homestead of the Grantor~.und~r,tl\e,
laws and constilt.ution of t~~ State of rlorida in, that '~eith.!r -
Granto~s nor any members of t.hn_houaehold of Grantors resi.le
. .thereon-;-----. - . .' . .
Tbis Correct.iy. WarrabtJ.De.d 1. to correct'.eriy.oer'. err,r
ia Wilrraat., D.ed d.t..~ Jaau.~ 17r 1992, recorded Aprill),
1991.~ft Offici.~ Record. Book 1872, page 2166, wbichlack. ·
cO'rrect legal de.cript.io" becaus. tbe .ubcU~i.loa D.... 'WI8,
aalt.ted, aad wbicb lacks a Doft-b~s~.ad'clause.'
TOGETHER with . all
thCL.3..I!tnements.,. hereditaments
and
appurtenances thereto belonging'or in anywise appertaining.
'1'0 HAVE AND TO HOLD the same t.o' the Grantee, its Sdccease rs'
:,
and assigns in fe~ simple forever.
,
a
-..... ~-
- - - ': - - .: -.~ -- -. . - -.
" ._.4._
~ .. .. .
,\
. -...
-..-.--- ...--
-
i.,
t
. I
, 1
r
'!
'.
, .
"
.
PI~~AS COUNTY :LA.
OFF.REC:B~ QS44. PC 1755
. ,t'
.,
'-
......
.... ,,'
AND the Grantors hereby covenant with Baid Grantel!!':-'that--th.!
....-- ~.,
. . Gran~o~~ 'ar,e lawfully lIeized of said" land in fee siDlple1 and thll
Gr.ntor. have good, right and lawful authority to seil and convey
.... ~ .
s.,id lanCl', that the Grantor.- .hereby fully, warrant' the.tit.],e to .al,1
land .and' "i.ll defend the ,same lIgdll~t the la~ful. claim.. ~f al L
'~rson. w~~_oeveq Md t.~:ats'~d: ~a~~ h t.ne of aU '~n~.,raneell
except taxesaccru'ing .ub.equent~ r>ftceiiib8r""""i1~~a~S" q. .
___ ... .~_ _ ..' J . '. . _'. .: : 1_
_,_____,-;=-._:' l~.-:.. 1fi~~S WHEREOF~ the Grantor. ,have. ..et their hand. and
seale on 'the ,day and .year firllt abdve.-written.
----.-----.---... ---
.
. . ..... .. .
. .Signed, 'Sealed and 'Delivered
in the presence '.of I .
:...-__-;-,4
-
c-
o I ,
,I
.\.. ~
l.~' . ,',~'
-:t;' nc'ola& Gaucher,
( .
, If""'.l L,J".) ':SJ 1/.(r
'. L.' - J' .
.. " n<-.(;~
Pr int Itame I .
...
. '.-
STATE.OF F:.ORIDA
cotl'HTY . OP PIRBLLAS
.Theforegoing, instrument ,was
:,thi. 4. d,ay'of t)~
, :;-Such personl
,J
ac);nowledged before' me'
.1996, .~!, Fra~cohe Gaucher.
(( _ ) i8 per.~nally known - t() DIe.
~ produoed " cdrrent. 'f=\<~ 6..D--driver'lI
. licen.e,.e identi'fica1:ion. .
'prtxluced .
"identif ication.
as
(I
"'-
,,~<~
NOTARY" ,UBLIC
. Print. NaJIle.' . .
Hycommi..ion NUMber.
My Commi..io~,Expire.:':
:.
.'~
.:. .n'" tSEAL~
~,
5
'.
. I.....
I' .
':=."
.-.
u~
.~~-
:.i
"'!-
.~-,
'f..._ ....,'
, .
, .
~ ... .
.,
o'
...::-
.
.
· - "1
' " FLI\
.PINELL"S cmJl:'T'Y . 17~6-' ,,' ,,',
9544 'G ;;>,.--
OFF. REC .81< ,.' .'., ,.~,.
. . ~'.
'I
0"
. {"-
~______Signed, S@al@d and Delivered
in.the presence of: .
. !L1:t~ ~~..
-;./ Jl!an-Pierre Beliele
-: .
a1IIr.t 7r'~ '~O
, llc:.o...~ "
Print Name:
..;,.;.
C,
'r~
,j
.~
- -- --- -------'-
STATB OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PIRBL~
....
, The foregoing 'instru.ent ,.-as a(:khowiedgitd 'before.1M
;. this ~ day ot 1:>~' , 1996, by:Jean pl4Jrr. Belhle.
,..._-:-._-Such.-per.on: ' . '. - , .
'. '
) is penonally known .t.o 1IIe.
) produced.. current ' driver'e
licitn.. .s Id.ntifi~~tion.
~produ~ed ,GA~~. ~ (}..he pC" r
identification;
a8
. (SEAL)
'. . U.c..v ~
UOTARY..PUBLIC
: I'rfrit NaiIlel '. ,', ,
l.y- . Collllllis. ion Number,:,.'.
I~y Collllllis.ion Expire.:- .'
. . ,"
n'I'-J non
''- ,--'- .. -l'
"""" .' UM IU1QIR
Q) lit c-r -alClC-- . .
. ,IlfIIItMl '" - ,
.......~.....~. .'
.(
~ -- ....:... --. ....;-....~
. ,./
6
.
.
.~ Clearwater
-~
u~
Planning and Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
CASE #: F(.... P z..o 0 'l.. - "0 3 'i
DATE RECEIVED: I' /7 J 0 L.
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): lAl t.J
ATLAS PAGE #: Z,hr f\
ZONING DISTRICT: "'
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ,~F H
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PR~Rir ~
NORTH: K.
SOUTH: .
WEST:
EAST:' .
J SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
~
SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans
SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ I2,..OS .\1"0
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 3/29/01)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: The Moorings Townhomes, Roland Rogers, Agent
MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box 676 Crystal Beach, Florida 34681
PHONE NUMBER: 512-0468
FAX NUMBER: 789-2982
PROPERTY OWNER (S): Beach Motel Management, Inc. a Florida Corporation
(Must include ALL owners)
PHONE NUMBER: 789-4372
FAX NUMBER: 789-2982
II ~ . i! \11/ I' I
i ,-n I _.; ::' ~t~."' :
;1 - j' 1 i
; Ii
I, I, NOV 0 7 2002 Ii II "
IUt ':~:,
tr-:..Jd4,.. < }.~:,.'.,..,.,.\S\'C~'
;.,-"'-~. -'-.~~__..,._~ '.:_.'.::":',:~~~:':~~n""
AGENT NAME: Roland Rogers
MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box 676 Crystal Beach, Florida 34681
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS: 620 Bayway Boulevard (The Moorings I)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 9 and 10 and RIP, Block A, Bayside Subdivision No.5
PARCEL NUMBER: 17/29/15/05004/001/0090
PARCEL SIZE: .33 acres; 14,577 square feet MOL
(Acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: Six (6) town homes above enclosed parking (3 stories total) with related new dock structures
(Number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (S): Front setback reduction from 15' to 3'; side setback reductions from 10' to 5' to the building itself and fro~
10' to 1.8' to the pool decking; rear setback reduction from 20' to zero feet for the walkway along the seawall and 10' to the proposed in-
ground pool and to allow construction of new multi-use docks and to allow 718.5 sq. ft. of dock area in lieu of the maximum allowance of
500 sq. ft.
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _X_ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
c. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
J
SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
@ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is
located. See Exhibit "A" attached.
2, The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof. See Exhibit "An attached
3, The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use. See Exhibit "An attached
4, The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion, See Exhibit "An attached
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
See Exhibit "A" attached
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties. See Exhibit "A" attached
@ Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTCRITERIA (as applicable):
1, The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards. See Exhibit "A" attached
2, The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties, (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.) See Exhibit "A" attached
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. See Exhibit "A"
attached
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. See Exhibit "A" attached
6.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Exhibit "A" attached
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole, See Exhibit "A" attached
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit "A" attached
10, The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary. See Exhibit "A" attached
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
J SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; tJ U~l ~ ~Q...t\S'.. ~
...@--COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
..@--PRELlMINARY PLAT, as required;
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
@ J,.OCA'TION MAP OF THE PROPERTY.
, '
J
J
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines.)
GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
J SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min, 10'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks,
J
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
~
REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) and color rendering if possible;
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
@
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
J
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
eonditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes,
'L
~
~I"
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) (color rendering if possible);
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
r
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable,
H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e,g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
J
~
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required,
~. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
@ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required),
~ Reduced sign age proposal (8 Yo X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
@ Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of sAPcfl~QY~ttay as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan,
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institut i ~iARW~Rral Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirem
K. SIGNATURE:
,
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application,
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ,.i-\...
\,\:worn to and subscribed before me this ~' day of
~\~ ~ ~~ A.D, 200'::l 10 me._,-a.Q~/or by
Gt .\dr '- , 'r:{'''''--'y <WIlo"i~.J.1.:.~:~~~as
~uce ~
identification,
~-'-'~~
~",\""lf/IIIII
~.... ~~'O' ....... <9/..1,;" ~
~ v.' '"SID''''' U' .....
;::: .'~~~'" '. ~ ". ~
~ .. CJ\,) ~'O\ 15, (', :.f-1; '. ~
~ :~ ~~ C?o~.. ~
_ .~~ 'i.PCf).:-
=*: ,... :*=
- . . -
~ 't> \ #CC863281 ':?J ~
~:;...\. .~,
~ ~'. J,; Sonded\ll~,y, .' C5 ~
~~ ;t-A.~~Fain.lns~\~\'l..;_~v~
~ VI> ....... ()'\ -if'
"/llloLle STP-.'i'(. ",....
IIIII/i '''"',,,,,,
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
L. ". I I V I-\U l-\\::IIeN I .
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4, That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5, That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6, That (lIwe) , the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
, personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewlcomprehensive infill application2,doc
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
If.
,. , l'tIat (I am/w8 8nIllhli owner(s) Md .--d'. 11OId8r(; rillINI foloWlng \1InC;rlbed property (add_ or~, IDcadon);
(,]..0 ~ ~4J).. ' .
~~~' lle:/t4f,' f1... ' "13''7'-7. . ,
2, Thal this property consli\UteS It'8 propenyfgr wtKh . ruqli8ltJor a: (de$cribe AJqU8st)
3. TtvIllhe undIIr'sIgned {Jlcui/!wIel 8PPQinCecI ...u (doMIdo) &ppQinl:
Kp l.,~../ ';i:-p-4 &
as (hlsM4llr) agenl(li) to 8lI8CU1& any pMitlcns cr 01tIer cIoClll11ent& ~ry to ;lt1ec:t!Wch J)IIIItIon:
4. Thatthls affidavit h_ beerlltlleCUled la iIlCIuce lfIe City 011 CkIarwtar, Florida to ~idW IU'Id ad on the abcwa descrtbecl property
5. "The aile vlslts ,to lite propIIlt)' a.. IleCIIS58I')' by City repr8lanI8llV" In Older to Pl1)CI!5li .. appllc:alloo and tt\B __ aulhOJtzes (:ily
'e~.'ivM (l) 1rUit anet ~ the prapetty desaibed in lhiIt .pprlalllon;
. noo_).~___~_~_..~
, STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF ,PfNEllAS
My Comllllaslon &pir.:
tJB<<0r8 me tPIe U"U;;eA ill' oIIIcer ~ commis~ '
~ PKL. , IJ P8ISOMlty appeir8d D~
[)epo&u ;wi saY" \hat hIl/she filly liJ'IdlInlt8nds the cot1f8nt& or u.. aft'Illavillhltl twoIJltN.
I" ~ CfIlIlIll" Call '
*Ji..., ColII..' . . ce..1'4t
~." EllpiIw..., a1, 2QOI ,
~
S\PfIIIUIIrI9 ~~1iDn FotmIvIatstaprr...lt~ InR1I
CIIclc
. :....
Page 7 eft 6 ~ Fleodble ~erit AppIicIdiOl\ R1u.IdorlGal..n. ~~ CIty 011 Clila!Wl)let"
',' ",', ~.,;. <;', · ;;:~,::t' ,'...',:,.;,:l'.."~.::,:.,.. ',;~,,; ,,' " ,.,." ""'~r;
~...~ " ,,'I ~,'~J t~ "'_~i... ,. " .~.~
,-~~
.~ !
.
.
Exhibit A
The Moorings I
Written Submittal Requirements (Section 3-913. A)
1. This site is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass district. The land
coverage requested is consistent with surrounding properties and in many cases,
less than that of existing structures as this area consists of more intense mixed
uses such as high-rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and retail uses.
The proposed three (3) story residential structure and multi-use dock area is
consistent with the scale and bulk of adjacent and surrounding residential
properties and will be less intense than that of the existing overnight
accommodation use.
2. With the demolition of existing buildings on site and approximately 1,400 square
feet of existing decking beyond the seawall, the construction of a new
Mediterranean architectural style townhome building, new docking facilities and
the proposed tropical landscaping, the value of the subject property will be
significantly upgraded as well as the values of surrounding properties. This
proposed redevelopment of the subject site will not only encourage refurbishing
of other surrounding uses, but will encourage new development within the area.
This three-story townhome proposal is in harmony with the Beach by Design
program as Strategies for Revitalization calls for the conversion of this area to
three and four level townhouses and time shares.
3. The proposed six-unit, single-family townhome use will create less of an adverse
impact to users of the area than the more intense existing motel use on site as the
site will be occupied by long-term residents (homeowners) as opposed to transient
tenants.
4. The minimization oftraffic impact being generated from the site is realized by the
change in occupancy from motel use to single-family. In addition, the proposed
driveway area will allow vehicles on site to have safer ingress and egress to and
from the site by allowing users of the site to drive out onto the right-of-way in lieu
of backing out.
5. The majority of the immediate vicinity consists of low scale motel buildings built
in the 60's and 70's with non-uniform signage. This proposal eliminates all
signage on site and provides for a more desirable Beach by Design project.
6. The proposed development will enhance the visual character of the neighborhood,
increase surrounding property values and shall not be a negative impact in regards
to acoustics and olfactory issues as a more intense commercial use may be. On-
site lighting will not adversely impact surrounding properties as all exterior
lighting will be limited to individual "coach-type" attached fixtures for each unit
and low density residential lighting around the pool area. No spillage onto
adjacent properties will occur.
1
.
.
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria
1. This site is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass district. Currently the
site is developed with a two-story motel building, pool area and wood decking
along the seawall. Additionally, there are several accessory buildings on site
consisting of a pump house and two sheds. The proposal includes redevelopment
of the site with a six-unit, three-story townhome structure, pool and retention area
and new boat dock structures. The applicant is proposing to construct mid-level,
luxury townhomes compatible with the Beach by Design program. The proposed
floor plans consist of individual enclosed garage parking on the first level with
two floors of living area above. A minimum of six (6) townhomes of the size
proposed is needed to make this project financially viable. The proposed side and
rear setbacks are consistent with other uses in the vicinity. The proposed front
setback ofthree feet will allow for an adequate two-way drive area, providing for
safer ingress and egress to and from the site and garage units. Currently, asphalt
parking areas extend into the right-of-way. The requested zero foot rear setback
reduction will allow for easy access to the proposed boat docks. Additionally, a
10 foot rear setback is requested in order to allow for construction of an inground
pool. A residential project of this caliber would be difficult to promote to
potential homeowners without having a pool on site. No variances to required
setbacks, length or width for the proposed multi-use docks are being requested. A
variance to the maximum square footage for a multi-use dock however is being
sought to allow 718.5 square feet in lieu of the maximum allowed 500 square feet.
2. The proposed residential use will likely enhance property values in the area by
providing new, quality, residential construction and significant landscaping on
site. Per the property appraiser's office, the existing value is $825,000.00. The
proposed development will significantly improve the value of the site to
approximately $3,000,000.00.
3. The City of Clearwater permits attached dwellings and multi-use docks. The
proposed three-story townhome project is consistent with the Beach by Design
program.
4. The proposed six unit single-family residential townhomes are compatible with
the surrounding land uses as many of the neighboring motels maintain long lease
tenants. Additionally, the infill of the proposed single-family use will allow for
less traffic congestion within the area which will be a positive impact for
surrounding uses. Also, Strategies for Revitalization call for the conversion of
this South Beach/Clearwater Pass district area to three and four level townhomes
and time shares.
5. At this time, properties are not readily available for this type of upscale, single-
family, waterfront, townhome development within this immediate desirable area.
The proposed development of this site is consistent with the Clearwater Beach by
Design program.
6. The immediate vicinity of the subject parcel will be upgraded aesthetically not
only by the architectural design of the new townhomes but also by the proposed
2
.
.
landscaping. The reduction of transient tenants within the area will also be an
improvement.
7. The proposed development will playa role in the continuous positive changes of
Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a newly revitalized site and
new buildings with long term residents. The proposal will provide on site parking,
thereby removing the need for parking within the right-of-way. The proposed site
plan, inclusive of landscaping, will be a significant improvement to the
surrounding area.
8. The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the
demolition of deteriorating buildings and docking facilities and the construction
of an attractive, residential project with new related boat docks. The proposed
project reflects the City's vision of a revitalized Clearwater Beach and is
consistent with Beach by Design. The site is generally unmarketable and
unusable without the requested front, side and rear setback reductions.
9. Adequate, enclosed parking will be provided on site. The proposal, as part of a
Flexible Development for attached dwellings, would require 1.5 parking spaces
per dwelling unit or nine (9) spaces. The proposal includes two spaces per
dwelling unit for a total of 12 parking spaces.
10. The design of the proposed townhome building complies with the Tourist
District/Beach by Design guidelines in many ways. On site parking is being
provided within fully enclosed garages on the first level. The proposal is for a
three-story townhome structure and Beach by Design contemplates conversion of
this area to three to four level townhouses and time shares. The proposed
architecture is Mediterranean in design which will be aesthetically pleasing. The
proposed landscaping will lend in differentiating Clearwater Beach from other
beach areas. The residential design of the proposed project will help to create a
sense of a "beach community neighborhood" and the street level of this project
will be pedestrian and vehicular friendly due to the maintenance of all required
visibility triangles. The enclosed garage spaces on site and lack of on-street
parking will also lend to an aesthetically pleasing project in lieu of open parking
areas. Six boat slips (one per residential unit) are being proposed for this site. The
existing dock area to be removed consists of approximately 1,400 square feet.
The maximum square footage allowed for a multi-use dock is 500 square feet.
The proposed dock area of 718.5 square feet will be a reduction in square footage
by approximately 681 square feet. Due to the property's width, as measured along
the seawall (approximately 123 feet), the required side setback for dock structures
is 12 feet. Proposed side setbacks are 17 feet on the westerly side and 21 feet on
the easterly side. Maximum dock length allowed is 92 feet and the proposed
length is 29 feet. Maximum dock width is 92 feet and the proposed total width of
the new dock area is 85 feet. All in all, the proposed multi-use dock significantly
reduces the square footage, width and setbacks of the existing dock on site,
thereby creating less of an adverse impact for surrounding properties.
3
e- .
FRG\'f : PATT I THE ARCH I TECT
FAX NO.
7277333769
-NOV.
04 2002 03:59PM Pi
,
.
........
111111 'atti ~be ~ftbitett, lhu.
-==-
Written submittal per Section 3-913.A
General Criteria
'I~l~-' : :-
I; I) I"
'I "
III i NOv 0 ? 2002
I L_ L
: f-~~~'r''J..L__._._.s~'',f; ,<~..:~;j.~.' c~
,i \ I:' i
1'- '\ \ ,
.... ' -!i
.'
,
;i I i
i i ,) "
, ,_-.../
\
The Moorings
620 Bayway
, ,
The Proposed Construction of a'new (3) Story, (l level parking with 2 stories living above) is
compatible with the scale and bulk of the adjacent and surrounding properties. Although
Adjacent to to the subject property is a Condominium project, most of Bayway Blvd consist
of Tourist, Le.low scale motel buildings. The majority of which are non conforming FEMA
buildings built in the early 60's and 70's. The land coverage requested is consistent with and
in many cases less than that of the existing structures.
The demolition of the existing buildings and the construction of new Mediterranean
Architectural Style buildings with Tropical and consciously designed landscaping, and brick
pavers with concrete hard-scape in lieu of asphalt will, increase not only the value of the
proposed project but also the values of surrounding properties when appraised in the future.
The health safety and welfare of those residing or working the neighborhood will not be
adversely affected by the residential use of these new buildings as the current use of motel
, generates more traffic and transient personnel, the stability of single family ownership may
well be an asset to the neighborhood and the Beach community.
The minimization of traffic impact is realized by the change in occupancy from Motel to
single family. The Institute of Traffic Engineer data substantiates the decrease in the number
of doily trips made to and from each parcel. Michal Quillin concurs that the drive
arrangement and the minimization of traffic is not objectionable to his office.
The immediate vicinity (with all due respect) of the parcel is more "ticky-tacky" in its low
scale and non uniform signage. We have eliminated all signage and are providing a
project consistent with the Clearwater Beach by Design Program.
The proposed development will enhance the visual character of the neighbor hood,
increase surrounding property values and not be negative relative to acoustics and
, . olfactory (bells and smells) other than what the usual single family stereo and barbecue griil
would provide.
1634SAN ROY DRIVE · DUNEDIN. FL$409S e 7~7.733.37e9 e AAC002103
FROM : PATTI THE ARCHITECT
.7333769
FAX NO.
-> NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES; Page 2
7277333769 ~NOV' 04 2002 04:00PM P2
Received: 11/4/2 2:52PM;
IIIIII ~atti 'atbe ~rcbitett, ]fur.
-=-
The construction of Quality T own homes will not only be an a~set to the Bayway Blvd
Community, in keeping with the General applicable criteria of the Clearwater Code, but
also is highly recommended within Beach by Design.
COMPREHENSIVE INFILl REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA ,
, '
The redevelopment of the parcel without the decrease in front and side-yard setbacks
would render the cost feasibility of the project (that is the land purchase and the
construction of upscale 1/2 million dollar purchase price units) undo-able.
. The existing value of the site, and future value is addressed in separate documentation.
The existing properties to the north currently have 5'~O" side yard setbacks.
Front yards are virtually non existent due to the "back onto the street" parking. The front
setback is applicable to the drive pavement not the building. Due to the narrow width of
the site a two way drive is required for access to the garages; Le. angulation of the building
, with a one way drive is not feasible. The recommended with encroaches within the front
yard area. The superstructure of the building fac;ade is gently telescoped back from 26'-6"
to 32'-2". Creating a break within the 110" street front cis recommended within the Beach
by Design guidelines of Chapter VII.
The use of the property as Townhomes is not only consistent with the City of Clearwater
Code of Ordinances. but is encouraged by the Beach by Design Document. Truly this
project is in the best interest of the future owners and also the' neighborhoods of the Beach
, Community.
The compatibly of Single Family residences with the adjacent Motel uses is best understood
when taking into consideration the long lease tenants of some of the local "mom and pop"
motels. There is no mix of use "within" this project, other than the boat docks.
The upgrade financially. esthetically, and with re~ard to the health safety and welfare of not
, only the adjacent property owners but the City as a whole is evidenced by the Architectural
quality of the buildings, the introduction of fire sprinklers within and the additional fire hydrant
at the dock. Alsothe eurrent, the site has 18% pervious area. Our new plan proposes approx.
25% not only pervious but Architecturally Landscaped, area.
;~,
1634 SAN RovDRIVE. DUNEDIN. FL34698. 727-733-3769 · AAC002103
FROM : PATTI THE ARCHITECT
.7333769
FAX NO.
-> NORTHSIDE FNGINEERING SERVICES; Page 3
7277333769 ~NOV' 04 2002 04:00PM P3
Received: 11/ 4/ 2 2:52PM;
111111 ~atti 'Otbt ~rclJitett, 3fnt.
-==-
The off street parking for this project is being provided by enclosed (2 car) garages below all
the future residences. The individual access drives to each garage range in length from 18'-
20' . A new two- way access drive is proposed to allow for ease of access to each unit. This
situation is a great improvement over the existing parking/back-out spaces that are on city
,right of way. Due to this two way drive, the front yard setback is diminished to only 3'-0" os
opposed to the required 15'.
SETBACKS
We are seeking to utilize the flexible design criteria of a 5-0"(Building) and 1'-10" (Pool) Side
yard setback, 3'-O"(pavement) front yard setback and 0 rear(pavement) setback. We trust
that staff and the Board will appreciate this request in light of the opportunity to enhance
the neighbor hood with a "new b~ldlng" project in keeping with the recommendations of
,the guidelines of lIbeach by Design" . specifically midrise townhomes compatible with the
residential cui-de sacs to the north and south.
Further. the minimalism of this request is realized when looking at the existing storage building
setback of O'-O"(south) and the exist pool pump house 6'-0" (south). In contrast to the
existing front Building setback of 1.7, the proposed townhomes Building front set back varies
from 26'-0" to 32'-2". The Irregular Front Elevation will delineate the individual townhomes,
, eliminating a monolithic building fa<;:ade, despite the 110' foot length of the structure.
The rear setback requested is 0' -0", due to the concrete walkway adjacent to the seawall,
providing access to the docks. The building superstructure rear setack Is 33' .8" well beyond '
the required 20'-0".
, '
Upon initial financial feasibility studies a project of 6 townhomes would provide for the best
comfort Jevel for the lending institutions and construction cost return. The reduction in side
, yard setback will allow units of a reasonable interior width of 17; ~8". While a 16foot interior
width, may accommodate single run stairs and narrow interior spaces, the need for '.'Iuxury"
space would not be realized.' " .
The new front yard will have a 3'-0" green area adjacent to the street creating a residential
neighborhood front yard environment
1634 SAN ROY DRIVE · DUNEDIN, FL 34698 · 727.733w3769 · AA C0021 03
FRO~ PATTI THE ARCHITECT
7277333769
.
FAX NO.
_> NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES; Page 4
7277333769 .NOV. 04 2002 04:00PM P4
Received: 11/41 2 2:53PM;
"
..-..
111111 ~atti 'OtIjt ~rtbitettJ )nt.
-==-
BUILDING DESIGN
The Moorings Townhomes are an opportunity for the City of Clecnwater to take yet another
small step towards the realization of the guidelines outlined in the Beach By Design
Document.
The Townhomes will be Mediterranean in character predominately 35.'3" (mean roof height)
tall. The introduction of elevator rooftop access places the peak of the elevator enclosure
at approx. 41' -4". The building is rectilinear in shape with an inundating fOt;ade offset in 2'-
Q"and 3'-.8" increments. Front Balconies and recesses add to the shade and shadow of the
front elevation. The Design, scale and mass of the building superstructure is well within
'''quantifiable architectural" standards of Beach by Design. '
The human scale of the street front and building/ground interface are realized through the
introduction of individual garage doors and low scale (9'O"AFF) tile roofs. The individual
driveways will have brick paver accents and be of concrete construction as opposed to
asphalt, further indicating the quality of the total building project.'
, The materials of the building will consist of Grade level concrete block with a light gray
cementuos color stucco finish. White Doric Columns and accents of White Architectural trim
will be introduced as linear elements at the intersection of the c;oncrete block stucco first
floor garage area and the wood frame stucco 2nd and Jrd floors. The 2nd and 3rd stories will
be a sandy stucco color. A deep burgundy window trim accent color Will be introduced
through the use of tile and paint on the window and door surrounds .AII railings will be ~Iack
Aluminum. ' .
, As stated earfier the irregular fac;ade of the building will not only allow for a delineation of
the individual units but also provide for shadow and contrast on the building face. The
exterior Balconies will further enhance ,the street fQ(;ade bringing interest, utility and fac;ade
offsets. .'
Due to the unique location of the new town homes and the superb view, The roof tops will
be designed to allow foraccess from the second floor balcony via a spiral stair. The roof top
,will also have landscape areas for fichus tr~es and other plantings. These plantings will also
enhance the front and rear elevations of the building. ' .
1634 SAN ROY DRIVE · DUNEDIN. FL 34698 · 727-733-3769 · AA C002103
. .f.cn~",.;:.
,~.
'.f.e ~-=-<i"j
os --
not
f.;tS_ , . d
. ..".., _' .between rR1\NCOISErGJ\UCHER, a marr1ed ,roman. an JEAN-PIERRE BELISLE
roC -. a married lIIan, whose addrefts' is 2545 Coachman ~oad, Apt.. 194.
al" -- .' - . . - .
_ =' ele~nrllter, Fldrida 34625 u Grantore", an~,'BEACH H~'EL HANI\.GEJtE'RT;--::-
'f(Jt^~"?1D- . .,.., . .-__u' ," - "'.
'INC., 011 Florida corpora.tion, of 6~~._.~a~ay 'Bou.!.e.!.!l.~<.l,.1 ~learwater,' .
..
~ .
~
-1.1
\.
"
--:
,I
.
.
I ~;ST It '.)1)- J.127 2!1
nfC ':.. l'~96 "]:"}P~~
lr...Jrt I .~rt~
"PREPA~ED BY "NO RETURN TO:
CHESTER E. BACHE~ER, ESQ. '/
HOLLAND "~NIGHT L
36,0 .Central Avenue, Suit.e isoo '
P. O. Box 3542 '
'-f7t.~Peter.b\lr9, FL 33731-35,42
:f
-
~_.._._-- ..._-
-. - - - -.-
. .
P t NEl LAS' C()U~TY FLA.
CORJ\BC'UVE lf~N'n bEED' OFF.REC.8K QSH ~:;. In4
THIS INDENTURE lIIade this -.--:L~ day of ~A....u.......~I", 1996.
Flqrida,
34 6.30,
a~d whose .tax
iden'tificat.'lon- 'number" i,
'5C}_~'L4~ 'b
as Grantee.
W 1 r R B 8 8 BT Bz
That the Grantorll, ,for and inconsideration. of the lIum of
$10.00 and other vftluable considerations, receipt whereof ie heret:y
,ackn~ledqed, hereby. grant, bargain, 8ell, '.~1ien, i:emi~!-" releue,
conv~y and con~irm to the Grantee, all that certain land situate in
,,.
Pinellas,County, Florida, viz:
.__..._ .1l....-.__ .
Lotll ~Ilnd 10 in Block A, BAYSIDE SUBDIVlSION NO.5, accordirlq
-,-to-ttr~'Plat thereof~ as recorded in plat Book 38, paCje. 38 .lld
. ~39.,.-of "the Public Records of plnellas County, Florida.
.. _, _J. ___. . ~ .
Subject: to ,covenante,. restrict lone, eaBeDlentsof. recordalld'
taxes for the "current. year.' ;) , .
_. . __n..
Parcel Identification Number: \.7/29/15/05004/001/0090
..'
~id p~p~r:ty ~II n?t the homestead ~f the Grantor~. under, tile
lawa and conet.vtut1.0n of th~ State of Florida in ,that 'neith,!r ....
'. 'Granto~e nor any rnell\bers of thfl_houaehold of Grantor. r..iole
. ,thereon-;-------:---- - . " . .
, I
-..,
'.
..
This Correct i.. WarraatJ.Deed i. to correct'.crl.eDer'. err,r
in warraatJDeed d.ted J.au.~ 17r 1992, recorded Apr!l 1),
1992.~a Offlc1a~ Recorda Book '872, page 21t6,whicblack. a
co'rrect legal de.cription bec~luse the .ubdl;1.1oa a.... '''18 ' '
Oaltted, aad which lack. a Doa.-hOlM.tead"elau.e.'
TOGETHER with ,all
th~L,..J:!-lnements_,. beredi.tamentll
and
appurtenances thereto belonging or .in anywise appertaining.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Barne t.O the Grantee, itll lIuccellllcr8
:,
and assigns in fee .8imple forever.
,
-~.. ,-
;
~ i. ~
- .~. NOV 0 ? 2002
~ _ 4':. _ - .: -.-
__.4.._ ' _'
-. . .. .
. -..-
.
.
"
PINELLAS COU~TY :LA.
OFF.REC:B~ QS44 PC l7~5
.,
---
."" ,,'
l\NO the Grantors hereby covenant with Baid Grantee:-'that.--thf!'
-----:-;; ....-- ~ .
.~... . .l;r';n~o~, ae,s lawfully seized of eaid" land in fee eimpleJ and thl!
Gr.ntor. have good,;ight an~ lawful authority to .eil and convey
IJltid land J Uiat the Guntor.- .heJ;'eby fully. warrant. the.t::.it.;e to ea1..!
land ,and' w111 defend the .euM. agaiJ:l~t the la~ful. chi-.. of all
'~uone whoaeoeverJ ud t~'at "aid, land ie tree of all'encuJllbranc:e,'
, " . -. .' . .
. .. .
except taxe. ;accpiinq eub.equent~ o.tC.iibir--n~~~~S''':''
_........... .~.... ...... .' .: J_
.. . - .
. ' '. .' lU. wiTNESS 1fBERBOF~ the Grantou ,hav.. .'.et their hand. and
-+--,----'- '-;-.-'-:'----:~----=---' , .
eeale on' the ,day' and ,year first abdve.~written.--...:--'---.-~'
. . . --.. ". '-.. .
. .Signed, 'Sealed and 'Oelivered
in the preeence '.of I . __.,,...J -.
C ~
. I ,
"
,.
...., :!'
. .
~~.s ,~,J...!.-:S-S 1,'-tf
_. " \\<..~~
Print Name' .
.",.
STA~,OF ~ORIDA
cotl'HTY . 01" PIRBLLAS
.Theforegoing. in.trwsient . was
:,thi8 4. d,ay'of t:>~
, :;-such per eon I
,~
, ' .
ac);nawledgedbefore'me' .
,1996, .~! F.ra~coi.e Gauchf!r.
((. ) ie pen~mally known' tc> lIIe.
~ produoed a. c\1rrent. ?\~,..-\ 6.D--driver 'II
. licen.e' all identifiCii:lon. .
'prP<iuced -
,identification.
as
o
....
.'~<~
NOTARY:' 'UBLI~
. Print, NaJftfu' - .
HyCOIIlIIli..ion Uuaber..
My Commi..io~,E~pire.:-
..
'..,.
.:. ,-_..- {SBJ\L~
-,
5
-'
. ,...'.
I .
.:~.~
'V.... _._~
. ;.
. o. .
.,. ----
.'
.....-
~
.
.
- 1
" FLA'
SELLAS cmJ~T't. . - "
,PI, .5.4 IG 1756,,- "
OFF. REC . BK ' ... .'.. ,':~
. ' ~'.
.'
____Signed, Sealed and Delivered
i'n . the presence of: '
. {'-
" !L1:i~L/~
-"7'/ Jl!tan-Plerre Beliele
---:.
~r_: ~N~ '~O
, l.l<:'c-~ .
'Print Name:
.;or:-
;:~
l.'
',:'I
<.i
,~
, . ,
...
STATB OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY O~ PIRELLAS
.' , The fouejoing .in.tru....ent "a. ackhowiedged 'before. me
:,' thi. ~ day of 1:>~' , 1996, by:Jean Pi4frre BeU.le.
0_,. __.~--Such--per.on: . . .
..._-~ --
','
i. per.onally known .t.o IDe.
produced.. current ' driver'e
licen.. a. identUlt:l!ltion.
produ~ed " ~~c.v-.. \'> ~< pl" r-
identification;
a.
~
. (SEAL)
" . \].c...c-. ~
nOTARY..PUBLIC
: I~rlrit Nailel -..,',
I~' ,colllllli..ion N~:,_'
'ofy Collllllie.ion Bxpi.:ree:- .'
. . ,"
n7-1nOOJ
;.., ~_...:- .. ~J'
" UM IU1aIR
Q) iiwCTr -iCC"" -
. ...-:.,.. ,
....-~....~.
:.-.. .
, .
-,
, ,oj
6
.
.
ATTACHMENT A
PROPOSED 620 BAYWAY BOULEVARD MULTI-USE DOCKS
CITY OF CLEARWATER
COMMERCIAL DOCK CRITERIA
SECTION 3-601C.3.(a) through (g)
(a) Use and Compatibility
The docks will be for the sole use of the occupants of the 6 unit town homes community.
(b) Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities
The dock is designed so as to not create any adverse impact on persons using the adjacent
waterways for recreational or commercial purposes.
(c) Impacts to Navigation
The dock as proposed should have no detrimental impact on users of the adjacent waters. See
item 7 of the Fact Sheet (Attachment B) wherein it is noted that the dock extends only
appr9ximately 20' from the shoreline as compared to the waterway width at this location of
approximately 580'.
(d) Impacts on Marine Environment
As noted by examination of the plans, the dock will have no impact on marine environment.
(e) Impacts on Water Quality
As noted on the plans, the depth of water in the area where boats will berth is a minimum of
approximately 8.0 feet at mean low water. This should provide in excess of one foot of clearance
between the lowest member of a vessel and the bottom at mean low water.
The mooring of 6 vessels at the facility should not adversely impact water quality.
(f) Impacts on Natural Resources
The dock will have no impacts on natural resources.
(g) Impacts on Wetlands Habitat/Uplands
The dock will not have an adverse impact on the adjacent uplands but will serve to enhance the
uplands.
'! i
NOV 0 7 2002
II.~
, ,
i I!
, .!
! U !
:1 ,
i L~--"
.
< ')'.'
.
.
ATTACHMENT B
PROPOSED 620 BAYWAY BOULEVARD MULTI-USE DOCKS
FACT SHEET
AND
DIMENSIONAL CRITERIA
PER CITY OF CLEARWATER
CODE SECTION 3-601C.3.(h)
1. Proposed Use:
The proposed use is a multi-use dock to provide 6 slips for residents of the proposed 6 zero lot
line townhomes. The 6 slips are designed to accommodate boats up to 30 feet in length.
2. Property Width:
The property width measured at the shoreline is 121.4' (MOL).
3. Setbacks:
. The property to the west (612 Bayway Boulevard) is restaurant/cafeteria. The required
setback on the west is 10% of the property width as measured at the shoreline or 12.14'.
Actual setbacks as proposed is 18.5'.
. The property to the east (640 Bayway Boulevard) is a condominium. The setback on the
east should be a minimum of 10% of the property width as measured at the shoreline or
12.14'. Actual setback as proposed is 18.8' .
4. Length:
The dock extends 20' from the seawall which is less than 75% of the width of the property as
measured at the shoreline or 91.05'.
5. Width:
The proposed width of the structure is 85' which is less than 75% of the width of the property as ,
measured at the shoreline or 91.05'.
6. Area:
The area of the proposed dock is 492.8 square feet.
7. Width of Waterway:
The width of the waterway at the location of the proposed dock as measured perpendicular to the
.
.
shoreline is approximately 580'. The proposed dock extends from the shoreline only 20 ' with the
outermost tie piles located at 30' from the seawall.
8. Docks being Removed:
An existing dock is being removed which represents the removal of 1,630 square feet of existing
dockage.
9. Seagrasses
No seagrasses are present in the proposed dock area.
.
.
\oJ'" 1.l.("Jrt\9
,
"
"
~~~~ a q~-1]Z72~ .
Ofe .~. 10;96 1: "3N~
'PREPARED BY "'NO RETURN TO:
CRf!STf!R E. BACHEL,LER, ESQ., . /
HOLLAND "~NIGHT l
..._.___~6,O.Central Averue, Suite isoo
P. O. Box 3542
.-st.~peter.hur9, FL 337Jl-)5,42
Jt
-
._--~ ....._..-.~
-. .- - - ..-
. .
. ~f.cn,ns'::;
\~.
'.t.e ~-=-&j
0' -
~f
'.;(S - , . d .... It E
"'" _' .petween rRANCOrSIrGAUCHER, amarr1.ed 'rolllll~ an JEnn-PI"RRE B LISLE,
,1: -. a married Dlan, whose address' is 2545 COllch1l\ail :..Road, Apt.. 194.
Ji\' -- . -, . ' . ~ '. .
_ ~_ ~le~nrater, Florida 34625 u Granton,. and'BEACH H.oTEL KMi1oGEJmlIT;--.-:'
~A"'C:"'t1D- . .",., . ,'--'" "'.- ' . .
'INC., a Florida corpora.tibn, of 62~._,~~I!lY Bou,~e~.!.~C:l.1 f;leIlO/llte.r,'
PtNELLAS'COU~TY FLA.
CORRSCTIVI M~Hlt bSED' OFF.REC.8K q~44 ~j. 17;4
THIS INDENTURE 1113de this ~~ day of 'J4.t...,,-J,.L/,
1996,
Flqrida,
346.30,
Ar'd whoee 'tax
ideoHfld1\tlon' . numbel" ill
.'
...
Z ~
~
-IJ
'.>~ - ~I L ~~ 'b , as Grantee.
" 1 f R I S 8.IT BI
That the GrAntors, ,for and ih ,considerAtion, of the sum of
$10.00 and other valuable conside~ationa, receipt whereof i. herety
I.
t
. '
acknowledged, hereby grant, bargain, sell, '..alien, remit!!.r, rebue I
conY~Y and con~irm to the Grantee, all that certain land situate in
~ .
Pinellas,County, Florida, viz:
.' .
\.
.__.."_ .'lL...., .
Lots ~and 10 in Block A, BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION NO.5, accordillg'
. ,__ -,-to-t"hl!"Plat thereof; as recorded in plat Book 38, }iagu 38 alld
. ,.19,..--of.,tl'le Public Record. of pineltes County, Florida.
. . .... _J. ____ . . . .....
Subject: to .6o~~nants, , reatrict lons, ellselllentsof. record alld'
taxe" fot' the 'current' year.' ) . .
Parcel Identification Number: 1.7/29/15/050047001/0090
. . -..' .
~id pt;..Op~rty ~8 not the h~tIIestead of the Grantor~. und~r, t!18
laws and con.tiJltutlon of t~_, Stllte of ~lor:ldain ,that '~lftith,!r...
'.: Grantors nor any IIltl\nbers of thu_houaehold of Grantore reel.ie
. thereotl-;---------:-- -. - ' :' . ,
",
"
'.
"
. . .'
I
Tb!. Corree~i.. WarraatJ.D.ed i. to correct'.ert.ener'a .rr)r
in Marra.tlnaad d~te~ Ja.u.~ 11~ 1992, recorded April 1),
1991.~n Offici.~ Record. Book :'872, pag. 21t'r,wbicblaeka .
eo'rrect. 1.gal d..crlpUon becllu.. the .ubdl~i.loD D.... 'WU . '
o.ltted, aDel "hlch lack. a Don..bCllM.t..d.chu....
.1
TOGETHER with ,all thtL....:...t!-tnementt'-,. heredi,taments Ilnd
Appurtenances thereto belonging'or in Anywise appertaining.
I
'l
and assigns in fe~ .simple forever.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same t.o the Grantee, its succellsc rs'
..
,
-.... ~-
f }. -
I,'
(r~jf'/nJij U; I .
NOV 0 7 ;;In/!!
" U J
f L:.J I
I '
I
svc:..
(f
-. .. ~- - ....
u ,_.4... _.
... '"' '
,\
", -...
'.
.
.
PINELLAS COUNTY ~LA.
OFF.REC;BK QS44 PG 17~S
"
. C'.',
.,
.:-:.:
---
',\ .
".. ,
. AND the Grantors hereby covenant with, Raid Grante~':-'that;.--thll'
".'-" ,?,
.. . (;ran~o~~ '&r.e lawfully eeized of uid' :Land in 'fee simpleJ and thll
Gr.ntor. have good right and lawtul authority to aeil and convey
.. ,... . .
l
'~'.
.-.
....
,~
.~:l~
:4.
. '." ",,'
{-:
,.",
. ,l.
. "V.... ....: y,
,.
.t... :-
l~' " · .~. . Ii;'
~ ncoile. Gaucher, '
(
., .
, ~~.l ~ ,J",.-:S-S ),I~r
.:, t\<..(;~
Print ".... .
,I
. '
.....
. .' . ~ .
. .
'.. .
. '. .
STATll ,OF F:'OIUDA
cotiHTT . OF. PI~LLAS
, .1'heforegoing. instrument ,'WAll
:',thie' 4. d,ay'of \)~
, .';-Such perllonl
:,;
. ..' ..
ac};nowledgedbefore'lIle' .
,1996, .~! Fra~cohe Gaucher. '.
. ,
(, J is penonally kno~' t.o me.' ,
(..)q produoed a c\1rl'ent, ?\r.,...-\ dJ)...driver' II
. 11c8n88'a8 identifiCftt~ion.
) 'prpduced .
.identification.
as
.'
l.
,..........
"'-
.'U<~
NOTARY~. ,UBLIC
. Print, Name,' " " .
HyC~i..ion Nu~r.
My Comml..io~,Explre.:':
.........
:.
. , ,:f"
.:. .--..- tSEAL~
.,
5
.
.
.PINELLAS cO~~Ti ~F~~56""'~1
QFF.REC.8K QS4 ....'..,
, .
--
.......
'. ('-
~______Signed, Sealed and Delivered
i"n ,the presence of c '
. ~1:t~ &~-
-;./ Jean-Pierre Belisle
;...
~~.~t
~Jl't71.v~ '~O
. ll<'c...~ .
Print Jfame I '
. ';'r7-
i:,
'r,
,j
~.
..~ _.~._.~..
,..
STAT! OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY o~ PIRBLUAS
. The fongoing 'inetrtiMnt "U a(l)mowiedged 'before.M
;,. thh --4- day at 1>~ , 1996, by:Jean pl4rrr. Belhle.
, '. . _-:-. ..-Such... per.on: ' . .
" ..'
) 1. per.ortally known .t,Q me.
) produced.. current _, " driver's
llctln.. .. identUlt:~ltion.
P<t . produ~ed .' c.,.,...~ c:v-.. \'> ()..I..{ pc... t-
. identification:
..
, (SEAL)
'. . \J.c..v ~
UdTARY.,PUIILIC '
: I'rfrit Maillet "..,.
l.y' ,Colllllll.. ion Number L,
''Iy CoDlllli..lon Expires:- "
. .......
rI'J'.lJ SOo!
. '.;"'~tM~'. .
Q) ,"en ,-;ce'" ] .
. ,~."'- ,
....-.,..~I
"
, .1
.....;.......... ..-.....
I
,
...1
"
PROJECT NAME
NES PROJECT NO. :
EXISTING CONDITIONS
TOTAL AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN =
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
C=
T.O.C. =
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
TOTAL AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
CN =
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV. AREA=
C=
T.O.C, =
.
.
Moorings Townhomes I
249
14,577 SF =
11,950 SF =
o SF =
2,627 SF =
0,33 ACRES
0.27 ACRES
0.00 ACRES
0.06 ACRES
14,577 SF
11,950 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN =
o SF OF POND AREA @ CN =
2,627 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN =
(LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION, TYPE A)
89.17
14,577 SF
11,950 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C =
o SF OF POND AREA @ C =
2,627 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.81
10 MINUTES
14,577 SF =
10,919 SF =
1,028 SF =
2,630 SF =
0.33 ACRES
0.25 ACRES
0.02 ACRES
0.06 ACRES
14,577 SF
10,919 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN =
1,028 SF OF POND AREA @ CN =
2,630 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN =
(LAWN IN GOOD CONDITION, TYPE A)
87.50
14,577 SF
10,919 SF OF IMP. AREA@ C =
1,028 SF OF POND AREA @ C =
2,630 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.82
10 MINUTES
, i2:~-"<~~
") ,
'I ,
; I
NGV n ? 2002
; .--,,'
,c ," .,,' j Svc~
,~"J ",',\/f.::l
~.............,....::.",,-_.-
98
100
49
0.95
1
0.2
98
100
39
0.95
1
0.2
K~ A.4-
FL P€ ~""lt31
v
.
.
PROJECT NAME
NES PROJECT NO. :
Moorings TownhomesI
249
STAGE STORAGE DATA:
POND 1 :
BOT. EL =
STAGE AREA AREA STORAGE
ft-NGVD SF AC CF
2.50 45 0.0010 0
3.00 291 0.0067 84
3.50 537 0.2146 291
4.00 782 0.2351 620
4.34 949 0.0218 915
4.50 1028 0.0236 1,073
TV. EL=
TOP EL = BANK
TOTAL QUALITY CALCULATIONS:
TOTAL AREA =
REQUIRED WATER QULlTY DEPTH =
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME =
PROPOSED WEIR ELEVATION =
AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY VOLUME =
14577 SF
0.75 IN
911 CF
4.34 FT
915 CF
~A.~
FL p~ Jpv 7lf31
.
.
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
PROJECT: Mooring Townhomes I
POND
JOB NUMBER:
249
VOLUME PROVIDED (CF)=
BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. =
BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. =
UNDERDRAIN INVERT =
K=
LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN =
915
4.34 POND AREA (SF) =
2.50 POND AREA (SF) =
1,50
0,09 (FT.lMIN.)
6
949
45
ELEV. TOTAL INCR L(AV) HG FILTER FLOW POND INCR INCR
FT HEAD HEAD (FT) AREA (CFM) AREA VOL. TIME
4.34 949
2.18 0.46 2.75 0,79 33 2.35 385 163
3.88 723
1,89 0.46 2,75 0,69 28 1,73 281 162
3.42 497
1.59 0.46 2.75 0,58 24 1.25 177 141
2.96 271
1.00 0.46 2,75 0,36 15 0.49 73 148
2,50 45
TIME =
TIME =
615 MINUTES
10.2 HOURS
fL--^.~
F L pe ,*,lO lfg I
N ~ "c:I "c:I . ~
0 .; 0 = '; =
0 0 = = .e-
N - Q., 0 = Q., =
--- '? ""' ""' "
0 0 = 0 = <..l
= = P!
- 0\ = \0 I,Cl = \0 I,Cl
--- N = ~ = ~ <..l
N 0 C C
-
- < <
... -;
""' ""'
= ~ "
Eo< E-<
C GO = ""'
GO ~ =
::: 0 e
'"
GO ....
= = ~ Q) ~ c:
z ::l = Po. ~ 0
== = = Po. +=
...... .~
i3
... V) a.
< 0
-:t a.
GO - CO
= -:t Q)
= l'<'l
GO I :6
t 0
- '0
i:Ii::: 0
Q)
= E
z 0
c .u
Q() .. :!::::;
Q() I;: E 0
an = ....
= Q) Q)
t-- u 0.:6
~ co 0
0 .... -
0 .el/)
0 . co
0 N = 1-c:'O
Z -0
0 Q ::::E: .- Q)
Q ""' O:::1ijt+:
0 =
0 ~ = WU+:l
= a..~g
0 Q ... - "'"'
0 ..... ... = c(o.~ 0
-- < N
N N ...CO Q)
0 ..... Oc:- ~
0 .. Zco=
~ U)....;: Po.
N ....
~ = -,E::l
~ = U)_o
.. Z -0.>-
=It '" .::c F 'CD -g
=
.....- Q) ~ U co
~ Q)
... ~ = ~'O
~ '" co Q)
CJ ::l .!!.! ~
0
~ = j
~ .2 1/).-
.- >
""' ~~
Cl. -
.C Q)
... u Q)
f!l '" .0
.....
Q ~ ~
c:
.....:l 0
GO ~ ~
"c:I ~ .2
=
U a.
= Po. a.
f .... co
Eo< ~ .!!.!
.. .c:
GO ~ I-
~
Q., Po.
l'<'l
0
0
-
-
I
N
= 0 "c:I
Z 0 ~
N =
~ GO ~ -= u
'" ~ d
cC '"
U Po. ""' ~
GO =
::: e
GO
= ~
::l ~
Po.
CL WCoverSheet
.
.
FLD2002-11039
620 BA YW A Y BLVD
Date Received: 11/7/2002
THE MOORINGS I
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 285A
~ j;" ! ~"j)'
l'L~.~!,,!',l \,\ t 1;\ ", j,:
[,~(--'-'. ._/j[n~ '." ~~"~~:?~~
~~NQ 1<:1 ~ u: )
DATE 1\ - 'I -0 d- ~
.
.
City of C,learwater
Development Services Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756
Phone (727) 562-4567 Fax(727)562-4576
PARCEL NUMBER / / / C)o t1~ 1/ (J
z PROJECT/JOB NAME -tilE MOCJRJIJ65 -r tJeu IlIHoI1li:'3 [) ()C~
0
i= c;2 tJ SAY/v!1 Y f3Lu/J :33707
< PROJECT ADDRESS ZIP CODE
0
0
..J
t- BUSINESS NAME PHONE
0
w 5E7: /l- ~C He-cJ UJ 117Z~d IlITY {)E2:;-[:)
, LEGAL DESCRIPTION
0
0::: " 0
Q.
LOT BLOCKfTRACT SUBDIVISION 3i
C1
CD
NAME (last name, first): PHONE C
0:::
W en
z ADDRESS CD
== 0
0
CITY STATE ZIP CODE :::J
~
A NAME f?JC /rIM D 1J ~JLB1JSt' I PHONr(1? r;)~"'()t/3/jj
-
t- 5 ADDRESS /520 ~1ff1Tl;7Jt,(Wf()O j)RJ lie- FAAb27JS50- 37 90
~ u
~~ CITY C L.eft{Lu:d~:'fEft STATE FL ZIP CODE 33'7q;(j
STATE REGISTRATION NUMBER Pt =# /5s86
CO. NAME ~ L1C. HOLDER PHONE
0::: ~DT 5El..EL~ ~lt\-is T\ME
0 ADDRESS FAA #
t-
O
~ CITY STATE ZIP CODE
t-
z
0 STATE LICENSE # OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE #
u .
PCCLB # CITY ISSUED BY
z WHAT IS EXISTING BUILDING USE (Single Family Residence, Office, Retail)
0
i= WHAT IS PROPOSED BUILDING USE ((t1JlllL1DWN tItNYJ~ 7)i:-lJ b~~~nce. Office, Retail)
<
~
0::: NUMBER OF~USINESS UNITS G
0 FLOOD ZONE
IL
z
..J NUMBER OF STORIES BUILDING HEIGHT CONST. TYPE: I 1\ 1\1 IV V VI; P or U
~
w
z SQUARE FOOTAGE: LIVING COMMERCIAL
w
C>
GARAGE/CARPORT OTHER TOTAL
IL
o~
WO:::
Q.o
8==
(/)
PERMIT APPLICATION
/7 29 IS
052 fI
C) 9t?J
.
.
iF FAX PERMIT PLEASE ENTER PROPERTY ADDRESS
NATURE OF
WORK
(Check all Jhat ENGINEERING 0 LAND RESOURCES 0 LANDSCAPING 0 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 0
apply)
BUILDING 0 ELECTRIC 0 PLUMBING 0 MECHANICAL 0 GAS 0 FIRE 0 ROOFING 0
UTILlTIESO OTHERO IJICI!5 -;0 PROU/OE 0 /!J(J6eJ/1/(S; 5LI05
TYPE OF WORK NEW 0
ADDITION 0
REMODEL 0
OTHER 0
DEMOLITION 0
VALUATION
$
/ s: t:J6cJ
ORC
COB
NOT-APPLICABLE ~ CASE # FL or FLS '
NOT-APPLICABLE 0 APPROVEDO
DENIED 0
(circle one)
DATE:
· Anyone planning to do excavation work, must notify the one-call "CALL SUNSHINE" Notification Center at 1-800-432-4770 prior to any
excavation work being done, in order to prevent underground damage. Federal D.O.T. Regulation Part 192, Sections 192.614 and 192.707.
Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installation as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced
prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction.
CERTIFICATION
I HAVE COMPLIED WITH ALL THE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL ASBESTOS REGULATIONS CONCERNING NOTIFICATION OF THE
PROPER AUTHORITIES OF THE PROPOSED DEMOLITION AND RENOVATION PROJECTS. ' ,
WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR
IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY.
IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF
COMMENCEMENT.
I am aware of Florida and Federal Accessibility Codes, and I certify that I have met the requirements of both.
I certify that, this application together with any plans submitted is accurate and represents all work being done at this time. All work will be
done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning and if not I realize I am responsible for the removal of any
construction in violation of these laws or regulations. Any deviation from information submitted, unless approved by the Building Official will
render this permit null and void. :
/?fJirAnJ 0 r;{X~. ~lD~\
P<o/~ ~~ jD-IJ-Z()o2-
Date
Signature of license holder
Print name
OFFICE USE ONLY
ZONING
FRONT SETBACK:
ATLAS PAGE
LAND USE
SIDE SETBACK
BUILDING HEIGHT
REAR SETBACK
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (Calculation by the City)
New PermitApplication.doc
rtJem ul7J jJifiaJ L3 Y.' t / LL Mo j).s
WIJO.PS DrusULTltU&
.
.
Application #I
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-USE DOC!\: PEUMIT APPLICATION
PINELLAS COUNTY WATEH. AND NAVIGATION CONTROL AUTHORITY
Please type, or halld prillt illIJLACK illlz
I. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
A. Applicant's Name: lMr!' MOORh.l<::"S TOUJ""HO(y\E:~) ~~h. Ko~E'A..'SJAl:se~T
B. Mailing Address: ? O. a,l' "liD
'(
City: C2'fS'.-\L 6E:"~\J State: PL Zip: 31{~S (
C. Telephone No.(s): (7;17) 5") '}...- Ol./"8
II. AGENT INFORMATION:
A. Name: -.BILL WODf:)S WOOD-So CONSUL"TlltJ&) I~,
B. Address: 3~~ 1<1 t)l...~ Ri>.
City: PA<<.M "~RGOR. State: ~ Zip: 3l./(, 63
c. Telephone No.(s): (7,27) 7BlI- <;;7t(;
III. SITE INFOH.MATION:
A. ConstrucLion Site Address: /0;0 BA'IWA~ &\It>.
City: C LE.-#tR W.4ft:::.~ ) Fl.-
B. Intended Use: ,- J'<.t fj M AAJ AMe-/'I \"fl( P ("-V,,N.,.. 1tl w..<'l~hl{c bEVE:.Lof> ME"J-I-r
C. Parcel ID Number: .J:11 ~q / 15" / d~CJO ~ /001 /QMO
D. Incorporated: (1( Ullincorporated: 0
E. Previous Permits: NO"T I<.AJDIAJA'
F. Date applicant assumed pl'Opcrty ownership:
'[;2 -'-{ - 9(p
month/year
G. Obstructions: (dogs, fences, etc.) NotJ€
H. Attach 8-1/2" X 11" vicinity map showing specific project location.
I. All other information pursuant to P.C.O. 90-19 (amended), Section 10.8, as needed.
J. Does the project abut residentially zoned property?
Yes 0
No c;;("
K. For projects requiring a public hearing, attach a copy of the complete legal description.
O~IJIWO/.rIIENVMGMNTlComBBe1.812l11l13
.
.
I\ppl.icaliOll "
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
DISCLOSUItE FOItM
In order to alleviate any potential conflict of interest with Plnellas County staff, It Is required that the Authority
be provided with a listing of PERSONS being party to a trust, corporation, or partnership, as well as anyone
who may have beneficial Interest In the application which would be affected by any decision rendered by the
Authority, (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
A. PROPERTY OWNERS:
Name: THE MCtlR\AX& \;kJ,tJMoJ'1.€S:
Address: 1<OL1..Wt> Ror.e::~A""e.v-r
t ~o. g6X b7~
Q\C\\'A-L QE'itC"J R- 'lef'-B \
Name:
Address:
Name:
Address:
Name:
Adliress:
D. REPRESENTATIVES:
Name: S,Lt. t.Joo~) Uoob.> Cs.N'lVL".vu) J.uc:.
Address: ::J;J,,(J R ,~(J: R ~ .
fA,^" H... !Pq~ J Pl.... "3 c., u. {; ?
Name:
Address:
Name:
Address:
)
Name:
Address:
I
C. OTH9i PERSONS UA VING OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN 'lJolE SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Interest is: contingent 0 absotute C1
Name:
specific interest held
D. DOES A CONTHACT FOIl SALE EXIST FUn. TilE SUn,JECT PltOPEIl.TY7
Irso, the contract is: contingent 0 absolute 0
YES 0 NO if.
Name of parties to the contract:
E. DOES AN OPTION TO PURCHASE EXIST FOR TilE SUBJECT PROPERTY? YES 0 NO ~
Name of parties to the option:
F. OWNER'S SIGNATURE:
I hereby cer ify that the' lformotion stated above is complete, nccurote, Rnd true to the best of my
knowledg
x
4/-
IJote
/6-//-02.
[)IllIWO'.,,,,,PMolGMtlT~B8e5.71'l1i1J
.
.
Application #
IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
MULTI-USE ~ COMMERCIAL 0
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
A Nature and Size of Project: fa... Sl.\p Mv~'1'-US€ DocK As AN AN\E;t.J(T'f TO
A l,,-\JfJ\-r TDwAl~V..l€ o~V~"""CCAl-r; 'PU?t\f'€ Se=E" VJFo~""'.AJ
Cd~(Pr'AJe~ IN A'"t"-r~MQI\JTS A tR Square feet: ~9.P.e
No~
B. Variance: Yes 0
Amount in variance: Length:
Setbacks: L
I Width:
R
Other:
NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to clearly demonstrate that any requested variances
are consistent with the variance criteria of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control
Authority Regulations. The applicant must submit a written variance request outlining the
nature of and need for any variances. The applicant must demonstrate that a literal enforcement
of the regulations would result in an extreme hardship due to the unique nature of the project
and the applicant's property. The hardship must not be created by action(s) of the property
owner(s). The granting of the variance must be in harmony with the general intent of the
regulations and not infringe upon the property rights of others. The variance requested must
be the minimum possible to allow for the reasonable use of the applicant's property. Should
the applicant fail to demonstrate that any variance request is consistent with the criteria outlined
in the regulations, staff cannot recommend approval of the application.
V. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION:
I, A/()-r t<.JJow"v Al 1)i{~ -r1M.~ , a certified contractor,
state that the dock has not been constructed and that it will be built in compliance with all
requirements and standards set forth in the "Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County
Water and Navigation Control Authority, and in accordance with the attached drawings which
accurately represent all the information required to be furnished. In the event that this dock
is not built in accordance with the permit or the information furnished is not correct, I agree
to either remove the dock or correct the deficiency.
Signed:
Cert. No.:
Company Name:
Telephone No.:
Address:
VI. OWNER'S SIGNATURE:
I hereby apply for a permit to do the above work and state that the same will be done according
to the map or plan attached hereto and made a part hereof, and agree to abide by the "Rules
and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority for such
construction and, if said construction is within the corporate limits of a municipality, to first
secure apPl'oval from said municipality, I further state that said construction will be maintained
in a safe condition at all times, should this application be approved, that I am the legal owner
of the upland from which I herein propose to construct the improvements, and that the above
stated agent/contractor,may act as my representative. I understand that I, not Pinellas County,
am responsible for the accuracy of the information provided as part of this application and
that it is my responsibility to obtain any necessary permits and approvals applicable for the
proposed a ivities 0 either private or sovereign owned submerged land.
~ jO!!!oj
. .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VENUE, 2nd FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME
RPA~h Motpl MAnAepmpnt, Inc. A FloridA Corp
620 Bayway Boulevard ~learwater, Florida
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
See agent
FAX NUMBER :
APPLICANT'S NAME
The Moorings Townhomes
ADDRESS
P.O. Box 676 Crystal Beach, Florida 34681
PHONE NUMBER
799-4372 FAX NUMBER: 789-2982
AGENT NAME
Roland Rogers
ADDRESS
P.o. Rox 67h r.ryst~l RP~rh, Flor;rl~ 14hR1
PHONE NUMBER
789-4372
FAX NUMBER' 789-2982
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all
representations made in this application
are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge. ,.......------..---.--.",
by who is personally known to ~,
-" --.____~\\\ltl",I'%~
~t'?J'O~~.~~~.~Clrll{~ me or has produced
f' ...~\WONi:i;;.. '% ~et."JcarJ ~
-::0 . G ,,'>1,>\ 15,.?", &.' ~ >-...
~ ...)....,"0 v......,.~. _ I "'-"'--. ~
- . "" .o:::r l1:., ,'..:. - -
- .--:' V-cP. - "_
~*: .... : * ~ Notary Public
~~\ #CC863281 :~~ my commission expires: ~'
~o. :~~ J
""""''l7l1dsd ,-"'. S
~. r)- A.'~ i'ain-lnsUI'l>:.. ;.<<v ~
~ lte. .......'" 0' ~
Ten (10) copies of the preliminary plat mu~~~~ft"$~d.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEL~S
{Z.worn to and subscribed before me, this (/taayof
)0 ~ le\,\'\p.l?" ,A.D., ,;:~ll::~to me and/or
The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale
not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information:
NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE;
TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED;
NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT;
IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES;
EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS;
PROPOSED STREET NAMES;
NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS;
Page 1
.
.
DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING:
THE OVERALL PLAT AND EACH LOT
STREETS
RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS;
COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY.
Page 2
. .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
January 28, 2003
Mr. Roland Rogers
P.O. Box 676
Crystal Beach, FL 34681
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-11003 - 620 Bayway Boulevard
Dear Mr. Rogers:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a
reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the
side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and from 10 feet to 1.8
feet (to pool deck), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement
and building) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck),
as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots. The Community Development Board (CDB)
APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
3. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording
warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYr HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
. e
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
January 28, 2003
Mr. Roland Rogers
P.O. Box 676
Crystal Beach, FL 34681
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-11003 - 620 Bayway Boulevard
Dear Mr. Rogers:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a
reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the
side (east) se~back from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and from 10 feet to 1.8
feet (to pool deck), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement
and building) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck),
as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots. The Community Development Board (CDB)
APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
3. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording
warning boaters ofthe existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYf HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
... ,..'
.
.
P'-.nr:.~
~~~LOFT/f~ '
~~~~
l'~r;~..:.,
~~\ =:-- ~~
~~j#~~
~lTE~',.j1~
~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mr. Roland Rogers
P.O. Box 676
Crystal Beach, FL 34681
January 28,2003
1E ~ Q. a.. ~ ~ ('" \'~'\I"\ -\ \O"^
~4-~ ~/ 'e) D+
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2002-11 039/PLT2002-11 003 - 620 Bayway Boulevard
Dear Mr. Rogers:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a
reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the
side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and from 10 feet to 1.8
feet (to pool deck), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement
and building) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck),
as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots. The Community Development Board (CDB)
APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
3. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording
warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BlI.L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.JJ.JItI#, j
.
.
January 28,2003
Rogers - Page Two
4. That covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an
administrative level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
5. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building
permits;
6. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
7. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks; and
8. That all storm water, water and sewer design standards ofthe Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (January 21,2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall
be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of
time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect
of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case
expires on February 4,2003.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.clearwater-fl.com.
v 5!l tru~y. yours,
~~~
Cynthia Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
Cc: Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
Bill Woods
\\MS5c\PDS\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXllnactive or Finished ApplicationslBayway 620 The Moorings 1- ApprovedlBayway 620
Development Order,doc
.
.
~~
~"~~().lOF r/f'tJ~~
1J.~#"(itP.I~;r^~
=-~,J ,(~~
, ~~,,)j/ ,i ~I.\
~~. - -, "oo;::C~
1O\r::~ === ~~Ioi
~~~ - :s
..~~ .~~~
~;rIA~~~~1
.~Y4TE~, ',Af :f
~""~nv'fJ~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
January 13, 2003
Mr. Roland Rogers
P.O. Box 676
Crystal Beach, FL 34681
RE: Community Development Board Meeting regarding application for Flexible Development
approval (FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-11003) to permit attached dwellings within the
Tourist District with a reduction ofthe front (south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to
pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and
building) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), reductions of the side (west) setback
from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and a reduction of the rear (north)
setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat
approval for six lots.
Dear Mr. Rogers:
The Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District
with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions
of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and from 10 feet to
1.8 feet (to pool deck), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to
pavement and building) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to
pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots for property located at 620 Bayway
Boulevard has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on January
21,2003.
The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall
at 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
w:;~ M. ~
Wayne M. Wells, AlCP
Senior Planner
Cc: Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslReviewed and PendinglBayway 620 The Moorings I1Bayway 620 CDB
BRIAN], AUN4Jltf~R-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYf HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
November 25,2002
Mr. Roland Rogers
P.O. Box 676
Crystal Beach, FL 34681
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a
reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions
of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and from 10
feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five
feet (to pavement and building) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to
zero feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under
the provisions of Section 2-803.C, Flexible Development approval for the construction of
six multi-use docks in association with the attached dwellings, under the provisions of
Section 3-601 and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots (Case Nos. FLD2002-11039 and
PLT2002-11003, 620 Bayway Boulevard).
Dear Mr. Rogers:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to permit
attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to
pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and
building) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), reductions of the side (west) setback from
10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20
feet to zero feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under
the provisions of Section 2-803.C, Flexible Development approval for the construction of six
multi-use docks in association with the attached dwellings, under the provisions of Section 3-601
and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots at 620 Bayway Boulevard. After a preliminary review
of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete, but with the
following submissions or revisions necessary:
1. Submit the original "Affidavit to Authorize Agent" signed by Branko Besedic.
2. Please submit the application fee of $600.00 for the Preliminary Plat.
3. Revise either the site plan sheet C2.1 to match the dock design (length, size, etc.) as
submitted by Woods Consulting or revise the submission by Woods Consulting to match
the site plan sheet C2.1. If less than 500 square feet, the docks will not be part of the
Flexible Development request.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYf HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
November 25, 2002
Rogers - Page 2
Any responses to the above comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional
comments will be provided at the DRC meeting. The above comments and comments you will
receive at the DRC meeting must be addressed and submitted to the Planning Department by
4:30 p.m. on December 20,2002 (15 copies of all submittals).
The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on December
12, 2002, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater. Please call Sherrie
Nicodemus at 562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate
time that your case will be reviewed. You or a representative must be present to answer any
questions that the committee may have regarding your application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727 -562-4504. You can access
zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
\~cu.'~ t\. W.~-o
w ayne ~. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
Cc: Debra Harris, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending caseslUp for the next DRCIBayway 620 The Moorings I1Bayway 620 Complete
Letter. doc
.
.
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758A748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRnE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
July 3, 2003
Ms. Lisa Penninger
600 Bayway Boulevard
Clearwater, FL 33767
Re: The Moorings I Townhomes, 620 Bayway Boulevard
Dear Ms. Penninger:
On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board (Board) approved a Flexible Development
application to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction of the front (south)
setback from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five
feet (to pavement and building) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), reductions of the side (west)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback
from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under
the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots at 620 Bayway Boulevard
(Case Nos. FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-1l003) (see attached Development Order). The application
included a six slip, multi-use dock for the townhomes. There was no public comment on the requests at
the Board meeting.
While the docks were submitted as part of the review of the above referenced public hearing cases,
Section 3-601.C.2 of the Community Development Code (Code) permits, as a minimum standard use
(Level 1 - administrative review only; no public notice or hearing), multi-use docks less than 500 square
feet so long as they comply with the dimensional standards (setbacks, length and width). The docks
proposed for this property total 492.8 square feet and they meet the Code dimensional standards. The
proposed dock structure extends 20 feet from the seawall and the outermost tie pole is 30 feet from the
. seawall (see attached drawing).
terest in the City of Clearwater and for taking time to better understand the land
Attachments
\\MS5c\PDS\Planning Department\C 0 B\FLEX\lnactive or Finished Applications\Bayway 620 The Moorings I - Approved\Letter to Lisa
Penninger re docks 7.3.03,doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HOYf HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
Baywatch Suites
600 Bayway Blvd
Clean vater Beach, Florida 33767
(727) 446-3477
Re: Application# M32654-03
Parcel# 17/ 29/ 15/ 05004 / 00 1 / 0090
620 Bayway Blvd
The Moorings Townhomes
City of Clearwater Planning Department
We are located within 100 feet of this project. We were not notified of this new dock with boat slips being
constructed. The property as it stands does not have boat slips or catwalks.
I was told that with new water construction the neighbors within 500 feet must be notified. We were not
notified.
The new construction plans going out into the waterway total of 30 feet is unacceptable to us.
The docking of vessels would be blocking the waterview in which we purchased our property .
We do not agree with this new construction of the 30 feet dock out into our waterway.
~
Please ex-plain why a pennit was issued and we were not notified and why a permit was automatically
issued. {.;eelij~D
RECEIVED
,;I)N Q f) ?nn
,/jf:)J
~NIN(J OIPAATM" .
OF CA.IAAVVAJr
J/~5
Jur~ dv 2J]O)iH!1
Lisa Penninger
Property Owner
600 Bayway Blvd
Clearwater Beach
P~'WNIN~_NT
Cf~F~TER
. .'
.Conditions Associated With .
Case #: BCP2003-02084
3/21/2003
8:53:26AM
BLD Building Review MDM
1. No permanent construction permitted within 18' of existing seawall.
2. Provide engineered/construction details showing the attachment of the Tek-Dec roofmg meets the components and
cladding design pressures indicated on the drawings.
3. Verify ballusters at stair railing meet 4" spacing requirements of section 1 0 15.3
4. Ground floor treads and risers don't fall within the allowed combination of24" to 25" of section 1007.3.1
5. The drawings show have (2) separate locations referring to a "cut" 3/S-5. There is no detai13 on sheet S-5.
6. There are no detail numbers on sheet S-6.
7. Typical wall section shows a 2'-6" footing, note on same page calls for a 2'-0" footing. Please clarify which is to be
used.
8. Detail construction of2 hour wall between elevators above rooflevel.
9. Sheet A-I calls for 1 hour rated elevator shaft. Provide details how rating will be maintained at floor connections to
shaft walls.
10. Detail construction of gable and conventional framing at entrance for middle units & entrances at end units.
11. Specify stair width.
12. Locate Egress for bedrooms #2 & #3.
13. Clarify & detail condensor stands. Drawings show an extended roof curb with a tie-in to built up roofing and metal
deck.
14. Indicate nailing patterns for floor, roof, and wall sheathing.
15. "G" windows adjacent to #8 door to be tempered glass.
16. Is the polygon item shown in the Great Room a T.V. or fireplace.
17. Drywall on ceiling to be 5/8" or 12" ceiling board.
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
1) Existing 2" gas main not shown within Bayway Blvd.
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
2) Existing sanitary sewer "wye" location and flow is shown incorrectly. City's atlas shows two existing service "wye's"
not three as shown. On Sheet C5.1, need to provide individual sanitary sewer service "wye's" per unit.
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
3) 16" D.I.P. water main not shown within Bayway Blvd.
ENG
Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL
4) Existing 8" water main shown should be labeled 6" water main as shown on city atlas.
3/1 0/2003
RLG
ENG
Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL
5) Need to label all proposed water mains and all appurtenances.
3/10/2003
RLG
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
6) Proposed water main crossing? Water Department would rather cross Bayway Blvd. with 6 individual water services
than have it as proposed per Sheet C5.1.
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
7) Two townhomes connected to same sanitary service, "wye"?
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
8) Addresses (from west to east): Unit #1 - 620 Bayway Blvd; Unit #2 - 622 Bayway Blvd; Unit #3 - 624 Bayway Blvd;
Unit #4 - 626 Bayway Blvd; Unit #5 - 628 Bayway Blvd; Unit #6 - 630 Bayway Blvd.
Page 1 of3
CaseConditions..rpt
.Conditions Associated With e
Case #: BCP2003-02084
3/21/2003
8:53:27AM
ENG
Engineering Review HwO NOT MET
9) Proposed fIre hydrant line to be constructed in ductile iron pipe.
RLG
ENG
Engineering Review
10) How is solid waste being handled?
HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL
3/10/2003
RLG
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
11) Sheet C1.2 Water System notes: NOTE #1: Per Article 41.03(B)(1), City of Clearwater Contract SpecifIcation and
Standards; the depth of cover over the water main shall be a minimum of 30" and a maximum of 42" below fInished
grade. NOTE #3: Per Article #41.02(B)(1), City of Clearwater Contract SpecifIcation and Standards; 6" ductile iron
pipe is "Class 50" with a rating water working pressure of350 P.S.I. NOTE #5: Should be Class 150 not 15FO as
shown. NOTES #7 & #8: Per Article 20, City of Clearwater Contract SpecifIcations and Standards; D.I.P. water mains
to be interior po1ylined in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. NOTE #9: Any fIre hydrants installed
must meet City Standards and SpecifIcations. See also City Detail #402, 1 thru 4 of 4. NOTE #11: Thrust blocking is
not an approved method of restraining.
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
12) All unused drive aprons are to be removed by the contractor at the applicant's expense. The right-of-way(s) are to be
restored with new sidewalk and sod as required.
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
13) Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fIbrous
concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" /10 x 10 w.w.m. [sidewalks shall NOT to be constructed within this
apron area(s)].
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
14) Replacement of curb along the existing roads to match existing curb.
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
15) The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will relocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as part
of this development.
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
16) All water/fIre hydrant main extensions to conform to city standards.
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
17) The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, set the meter and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if
applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees.
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
18) Need a copy of an approved health permit for the installation of the domestic water line prior to issuance of a
building permit.
ENG Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003 RLG
19) Ductile iron from main (tap) to the B.F.P.D.
ENG
Engineering Review
20) Fire hydrant line to be DR 18 pipe.
HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL
3/10/2003
RLG
ENG
Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003
21) Need to show all city details applicable to this project. The City's Construction Standards and Utility Information
can be found on our web site: www.clearwater-fl.com/engineer. go to "Documents and Publications", then to
Engineering Construction Standards, then select the applicable details.
RLG
Page 2 of 3
CaseConditions..rpt
.Conditions Associated With .
Case #: BCP2003-02084
3/21/2003
8:53:26AM
ENG
Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003
22) Need to submit 5 sets of as-builts that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of
Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-builts for accuracy.
ENGINEERING REVIEW HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL 3/10/2003
23) Fire hydrant lines greater than 10 feet from tee need to install a gate valve per Land Development Code.
RLG
ENG
ENG
Engineering Review HwO NOT MET 3/10/2003 MEL
24) Final Plat recorded with Pinellas County prior to the Building Permit being issued.
3/11/2003
RLG
FIR Fire Review HwO NOT MET 2/21/2003 J C 2/21/2003 J C
Smoke Alarms must be interconnected within a living unit so that operation of any smoke alarm will cause the alarm in
all smoke alarms within the living unit to sound. As per NFPA 101, Section 9.6.2.10.3
FIR Fire Review HwO NOT MET 2/21/2003 J_C 2/21/2003 J C
Power must be on prior to fma1 Fire Inspection.
MEC Mechanical Review HwO NOT MET 3/6/2003 MDM 3/6/2003 MDM
1. AS SHOWN, AIR HANDLERS lA, 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A, & 6A CANNOT PERFORM AS SHOWN IN DETAILS.
PLEASE CLARIFY METHOD OF RETURN AIR INTO AIR HANDLERS.
MEC Mechanical Review HwO NOT MET 3/6/2003 MDM 3/6/2003 MDM
2. IF AIR ROOMS ARE TO BE USED AS PLENUM ROOMS THE FLOOR DRAINS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN
THAT ROOM.
MEC Mechanical Review HwO NOT MET 3/6/2003 MDM 3/6/2003 MDM
3. PROVIDE BALANCED AIR SYSTEM PER SECTION 601.4 OF THE 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE-
MECHANICAL.
PLU Plumbing Review HwO NOT MET 3/6/2003 MDM 3/6/2003 MDM
1. PLUMBING DRAWINGS SHOW A/C CONDENSATE TO DRAIN INTO FLOOR DRAIN. THIS IS NOT
PERMITTED. MECHANICAL DRAWINGS SHOW CONDENSATE DRAINING INTO DRYWELL. THIS IS AN
ACCEPTABLE METHOD.
PLU Plumbing Review HwO NOT MET 3/6/2003 MDM 3/6/2003 MDM
2. PROVIDE TRAP PRIMER FOR FLOOR DRAIN.
TECO Traffic Engineering Condition HwO NOT MET CO
Wooden fence should not exceed 30" in height from the ground surface within the sight triangle.
3/14/2003
CM
ZON
Zoning Review HwO NOT MET
2/24/03 - Final Plat must be recorded prior to the issuance of the permit.- WW
2/24/2003
WW
Page 3 of3
CaseConditions..rpt
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: January 21. 2003
Case Number: FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-11003
Agenda Item: D3
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Beach Motel Management.
APPLICANT:
The Moorings Townhomes.
REPRESENTATIVE:
Mr. Roland Rogers.
LOCATION:
620 Bayway Boulevard.
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings within
the Tourist District with a reduction ofthe front (south) setback from
15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and
from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), reductions of the side (west)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and a
reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to
pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary
Plat approval for six lots.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.33 acres; 14,577 square feet.
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
120 feet of width along Bayway Boulevard by 120 feet of depth.
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Overnight accommodations
Attached townhome dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
RFH, Resort Facilities High Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
T, Tourist District
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-
11003 - Page 1
.
.
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Intracoastal waterway
West: Restaurant
East: Attached dwellings (condos)
South: Automobile service station; outdoor recreation
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Multi-family dwellings, overnight accommodation and commercial
uses dominate the immediate vicinity.
ANALYSIS:
The square site is 0.33 acres located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 1,300
feet west of Gulf Boulevard. It is located along a highly developed area within Clearwater Beach
and has frontage along Clearwater Bay. The site is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass
District of Beach By Design which is a distinctive area of mixed uses, including high rise
condominiums, resort hotels and commercial uses. Beach by Design contemplates this District
will be an area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on
the balance of Clearwater Beach.
The site is currently developed with a one- and two-story, L-shaped 14 room motel (plus the
manager's apartment). The existing building is approximately 20 feet in height. The site has one,
undefined, existing driveway along most of the south property line (Bayway Boulevard), where
parking spaces "back out" into the right-of-way. The site is currently nonconforming with regard
to "back out" parking and front, side and rear setbacks. The site also contains ala feet wide deck
that extends the entire width of the property over the water. All existing improvements (buildings,
pavement, walkways and deck) will be removed as part of the site's redevelopment.
The proposal includes constructing a six-unit, three-story townhome building. The building will
contain two floors of living area above one floor of ground-level parking. Each unit will be
approximately 2,400 square feet in area. The parking will include two garage spaces per unit
under the building. The development will operate as and have the characteristics of single-family
homes, including the individual garages. Redevelopment of this site will eliminate the "back out"
parking, providing much safer vehicle maneuvering on-site, with access confined to two, 24 feet
wide driveways.
The request is to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction ofthe front
(south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from
10 feet to five feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), reductions of the side
(west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and a reduction in the rear
(north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), under the provisions of Section 2-803 as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The reduction in side (east and west) setbacks from
10 to five feet is a function of the unit size and will provide additional landscaping and a more
economically, viable project. The Building Code requires an 18-foot separation between structures
and the seawall (the pool is at a la-foot separation). Adjustments to this separation may be
reviewed by the Building Official.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-
11003 - Page 2
.
.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color (light gray and sand)
stucco, teal color barrel tile roof and a significant number of windows and balconies on all
elevations. The trim and detail color will be white and deep burgundy. The building will also be
articulated with the unit entries protruding from the front fayade and with the center two units set
forward closer to the street than the other units on either side. On the rear of the building, units
will be provided with roof-top decks accessed via spiral staircases for additional outdoor living
areas.
The landscape plan exceeds the Code requirements utilizing a variety of colorful groundcovers
(including lantana and dwarf confederate jasmine), shrubs (including Indian hawthorn, dwarf
oleander and seagrape) and trees (including cabbage palms, washingtonia palm and tree form
oleander). The landscape plan also includes a variety of interesting specimen plants (including
variegated ginger and lily). Additional landscaping will be possible on the roof-top decks at the
rear of the building.
The applicant will remove all signs. No new signs are proposed with this development. Solid
waste will be removed via black barrel service for each unit. All required Parks and Recreation
fees will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. The applicant will be
selling the units fee simple, which includes land, and will record a Final Plat prior to the issuance
of building permits. Additionally, storm water, water and sewer design standards will be required
to be met prior to building permit issuance.
The applicant will be removing the deck area over the water in the rear (north side). As part ofthe
redevelopment of this site, the applicant proposes to construct a six-slip multi-use dock of less
than 500 square feet. This dock only requires administrative review (no public hearing). The
proposed dock meets Code provisions. Use of the dock should be for residents and guests only
and not sub-leased.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-801.1):
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 30 dwelling units per 14 overnight 6 dwelling Yes
acre (9 units)/40 accommodation units
overnight units plus
accommodation manager's apt.
units per acre (13
units)
IMPERVIOUS 0.95 0.82 0.75 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO (lSR)
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-
11003 - Page 3
.
e
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803):
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 14,577 square 14,577 square Yes
(minimum) feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 120 feet 120 feet Yes
(minimum)
FRONT N/A South: zero feet South: three feet Yes
SETBACK to pavement; 18 to pavement; 26
feet to building feet to building
REAR N/A North: 12 feet to North: 27 feet to Yes
SETBACK building; zero building; zero
feet to wood feet to pool deck
deck
SIDE N/A East: 10 feet to East: five feet to Yes
SETBACK building; zero pavement and
feet to wood building; 1.8 feet
deck to pool deck
West: six feet to West: five feet to
building; zero pavement and
feet to wood building
deck
HEIGHT N/A 20 feet 25 feet to roof Yes
maximum deck; 31 feet to
mean roof
PARKING Determined by 13 spaces 12 spaces (two Yes
SPACES the Community per dwelling unit
minimum Development in the garages)
Director based
on the specific
use and/or ITE
Manual standards
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803.C):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development
standards.
The subject property was developed in 1957 and has been used as overnight
accommodations since that time. The existing two-story building on the site has undergone
some deterioration. The proposal includes a redevelopment of the site with a six-unit
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-
11003 - Page 4
.
e
townhome development with fee simple lot ownership. The applicant desires to develop in
an area of strategic revitalization and renovation, identified in "Beach by Design, " with
direct access to Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf.
The applicant proposes six mid-level, luxury townhomes compatible with Beach by
Design. The allowable density for this site would permit nine dwelling units. The
applicant desires a building residential in character. The requested setback reductions
make the site more marketable and usable due to unit size resulting in a building consistent
with Beach by Design. Many properties along Bayway Boulevard currently have zero
setbacks to property lines and "back out" parking onto Bayway Boulevard. Many of the
existing parking spaces for these properties exist within the right-of-way. The applicant
proposes to provide on-site parking, reducing the number of and width of driveways to two
and 24 feet respectively.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
The proposed retail use will help stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area by
providing a refurbished site and a new building. The current assessed valuation of the site
is $825,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the assessed valuation is projected at
$3,000,000. This increase in property value is expected to have a beneficial effect on
surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The City of Clearwater permits attached dwellings. The site is located within the South
Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach By Design which is an area of strategic
revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of
Clearwater Beach.
4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Adj acent land uses to the west and south are commercial in nature, whereas uses to the east
are multi-family residential dwellings and overnight accommodations. The proposal
includes removing all existing buildings and all asphalt on the site and enhancing the site
with a new building and landscaping which exceeds the intent of Code. The site is located
within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach By Design which is an area of
strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance
of Clearwater Beach. The proposal will aid in the revitalization of the Bayway Boulevard
and Clearwater Beach as a whole. This location provides an opportunity to redevelop a
portion of Clearwater that is currently undergoing renewed investment and redevelopment.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-
11003 - Page 5
.
.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
The location of the site, in relation to Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf of Mexico, makes it
uniquely and ideally suited for the proposed attached dwelling development. The applicant
desires to locate a multi-family development with a single-family character along
waterfront property within an emerging, residential neighborhood. Properties with these
characteristics are limited within the City. The applicant is developing a property
consistent with and encouraged by Beach by Design and is developing other similar
projects on Clearwater Beach.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The Mediterranean architecture and landscape design will set a new
standard for the area. It may influence similar redevelopment efforts in the area.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will play a role in the continuing positive changes of
Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a revitalized site and building. The site
is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach By Design which is an
area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the
balance of Clearwater Beach. The proposed development will play an important role in the
continuing revitalization of the beach. The City will benefit by having an attractive
building located in a redeveloping area. The proposed building and landscape
enhancements will significantly improve the site, as well as the elimination of parking
backing out into Bayway Boulevard. The current proposal incorporates well-articulated
unified elevations and coordinated architectural elements.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the
demolition of a deteriorating building and the construction of an attractive residential
development. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of a revitalized Clearwater
Beach and is consistent with Beach by Design. Due to unit size to meet market demands,
the requested setback reductions are necessary to comply with various other Code
provisions and make the site otherwise unusable.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-
11003 - Page 6
.
.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Adequate parking is being provided on-site. The proposal, as part of a Flexible
Development for attached dwellings, would require 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit or nine
spaces. The proposal includes two garage spaces per dwelling unit or 12 spaces.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3 (Beach by Design).
The proposal eliminates "back out" parking by limiting access to two, 24 feet wide
driveways and on-site vehicle maneuvering for the on-site enclosed garage spaces. The
proposed Mediterranean architecture will be aesthetically pleasing, blending with other
similar projects to the north in the Small Motel District. The proposed landscaping will
lend in differentiating Clearwater Beach from other beach areas. The residential design of
the proposed project will help to create a sense of a "beach community neighborhood"
along Bayway Boulevard.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with modest one- and two-story multi-family dwellings and
overnight accommodations to the east and with commercial uses to the south and west.
This proposal includes luxury townhomes to be sold fee simple with amenities including a
dock and swimming pool. It will provide a positive redevelopment example for the area.
The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the
Tourist District. The site is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of
Beach By Design. The proposal is consistent and in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage and density, and is compatible with the existing and emerging character, of the
adjacent properties and with Beach by Design.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is zoned Tourist District and is in an area characterized by multi-family dwellings,
overnight accommodation establishments and commercial uses. The character and
intensity of the proposed development will be in compliance with that zoning
classification. The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio
standards within the Tourist District. The proposal is consistent with Beach by Design and
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-
11003 - Page 7
.
.
will help generate a more appropriate mix of residential uses and encourage the like-
redevelopment of other sites. The proposed redevelopment will substantially improve the
value ofthe subject property, which will have a positive impact on surrounding properties.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the
neighborhood, is permitted in the Tourist District and is encouraged Beach by Design. The
proposal includes six owner-occupied, dwelling units with landscaping and parking spaces
in excess of Code requirements, in addition to other on-site amenities. The proposal
eliminates parking that "backs out" into, and is located within, the right-of-way of Bayway
Boulevard, providing enhanced pedestrian safety.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will improve the existing ingress/egress point of access from
Bayway Boulevard, which is basically one large driveway/parking area. The proposal
includes redeveloping the site with six attached townhome dwellings, replacing 13 existing
motel rooms and a manager's apartment. Vehicle trip generation will decrease with the
proposal from 128 trips/weekday to 35 trips/weekday. This reduction, with the elimination
of the "back out" parking and reduction of driveway width(s) from 120 feet to 24 feet, will
not reduce the level of service (LOS) on Bayway Boulevard.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with the intent for the South Beach/Clearwater
Pass District under Beach by Design is an area of strategic revitalization and renovation in
response to improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach. Construction of
these attached townhomes will change and raise the standards of the community character
of this area of the immediate vicinity, through attractive architecture and well-designed
landscaping.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes removing all existing buildings and pavement and constructing a
six-unit, three-story townhome building, with first-floor garage parking, attractive
architecture and well-designed landscaping. Existing parking spaces located within, and
backing into, the right-of-way of Bayway Boulevard will be eliminated. Residents will
utilize black barrels for trash collection, which will be stored within their garages on days
other than pick-up days.
Staff Report- Community Development Board- January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-
11003 - Page 8
.
.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on December 12, 2002. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development request to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction of
the front (south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool
deck), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building)
and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and
Preliminary Plat approval for six lots for the site at 620 Bayway Boulevard, with the following
bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
3. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording
warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
4. That covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an
administrative level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
5. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building
permits;
6. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
7. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks; and
8. That all storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11 039/PL T2002-
11003 - Page 9
.
.
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
\ IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending cases\Reviewed and Pending\Bayway 620 The Moorings I\Bayway 620 Staff Report.doc
Staff Report - Conununity Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11 039/PL T2002-
11 003 - Page 10
M ::;s
g <
("f 00
00 l"')
;:::; ("f
V)
0'1
~~
;: a c
.~ ~ >
~ '7 ffi
N
cg>
'> N ~
..... Q ):
...... ~ ex:
< ~ m
~=I:t:~
rI:l ~ (Q
~ (I)
u~
~~I
-0
u
....
4
:::'=:u
.9
6
'8-
-0
. Oil
0..
-0
S
1S
~
.~
:g
o
,n
.9
o
~
o
'g l"')
0.. 1S
..5 8
S ~
.~ ~
0.. ~
'" 8
S . 6
~o~
'@'cJZ'
''l
o
g::;s
-- I
gu
--
("f
~I
Cl
.....:l
o
II::
o
l=l
o
Z
''l
o
o
~
....
....
--
("f
N
o
o
("f
--
r--
--
....
....
~
Cl.l
.;;
Cl.l
P::
OIl
l=l
~
U
\+::
.....
C<l
....
F-<
a
r--
a
Cl
Cl
.....:l
~
III
Oh
a
'fj
2
.t;:j
~
:€
~
.~.
bY ....
e- gE ,s .~
~ ~ b
.ebb 0.. ~
~ ~ ~ -0 ~
o ~! .....
:.~~ Cl.l ]
-0 S '6'~ ]
~~~ ~ ~
.s ~ ~o.. ~ . "'g
<1.1 0 '" ,s 0
,n '.j:l ?->)ll ti
n ~ ~ !a l:: ,S
"'I.j:;~ ....
] 'g :3: 'ij ~ 2 "8
'S o....c '" a ~ ...
0" U) .<;:: Cl.l 0.. ~ :s
2;a~ Su;ou
.... ,.;G dl ~ ~
.~ C<l U S:::l 0.. 0
:s "E ~ .,s OIl 8 g-
o ~'u . (]) 0 _ .....
<::-oo~...-ooo
~ ~ i .~ ~ ~ i ;,
<~ziz$z$
=- U N .S M ~ li1' G'
.:E:
OIl
'03
..c
.E
N
a
ac.:J
~~
N
....
.....:l
~
::;s
Cl
.....:l
o
II::
Cl.l
l=l
o
Z
("f
o
a
N
--
r--
--
....
....
~
<1.1
.;;
~
OIl
.S
....
Cl.l
Cl.l
l=l
.....
OIl
l=l
~
a
00
a
Cl
Cl
.....:l
~
-0
a -0
~. S
Cl.l ~ 1S ~
.;: "5 '3 j
c.S .L ar ~
'" 'Eh.....<2 f:::
~ ;::;.~ .B "E ~ :;l:
5h <a.,s:=:~o 0
~ ~ OIl'~ Cl.l gt ~
g; Cl) ~ .... <:: ~
o ~ 0 ~ O'b ...
~ .~]5~] ~
.. a ~ ~ :=: ~ "3 ~ S
~~~~~~.2<;;; .~
z 'i5...... '" .S '03 _'" ~ -0
t;;:1 .~.3 l::: ,~ E ->> 0 1:'" "E
""'.,sgpg~!l[{580 .
~ :€ '12 .vi .~ ~ C<l ~ ~ ~ ~
u~8C<l...C<l~Cl.l:S:~o\
uCl.lo --Oo,n.....
l"')g C '" a ~ t" .. '00 ..c C<l '"
1di';S0~ ~>>"'....~
.....bOO.;:_ o..la03~.ao
"7.9 5h '" ~ 0 ~ ...15...{3 {5
~1S~'~ ~ l5.aJ<2 ~ ~\O
S~~$~~~~Z83
s: :? ~ $ G '8- 6' G3" ~ ~ ~
~.
:g
...
~
("f
a
aU)
~~
--
....
....
Cl.l
l=l
o
Z
N
a
o
N
--
r--
--
....
....
.S
-0
Cl.l
..d
U
C<l
~
C<l
'"
=
Cl.l
S l=l
:::l C<l
u....
o~
Cl~
V)
"<t
N
<
Cl
.....:l
~
("f
a
aU)
~~
--
....
....
Cl.l
l=l
o
Z
N
a
a
N
--
r--
--
....
....
0..
o
....
~
OIl
l=l
'B
:::l
..0
<
o
F-< ....
.... Cl.l
~ ~
~o
V)
l"')
N
<
Cl
.....:l
~
''l
a
a
~~
--
N
~
~
~
z
o
Cl
Cl.l
l=l
o
Z
''l
a
a
N
--
V)
N
--
....
N
a
a
N
--
r--
--
....
....
'"
'"
Cl.l
l=l
Cl.l
....
Cl.l
]-
o
U
.....
o
....
Cl.l
~
Cl.l
.....:l
a
l"')
N
<
Cl
.....:l
~
~
~
:~
t:
-<
1A
'"
u
("f
a
aU)
~~
--
....
....
<"l
'-
o
Cl.l
~
i:l..
Cl.l
=
o
Z
N
a
a
N
--
r--
--
....
....
....
:::l
o
-0
..2
.;
::;s
o
ci
"<t
"<t
N
<
Cl
.....:l
~
M ::E . . ~
0
0 < b
N 00 :~
---.
00 <;! 1:)
---. N -<
...... V) ~
'"
0'1 U
~<:'I
.5 ~ c
...... Q
fI.I.....>
.... ..... -I
~ ~ m
>.g>
:.:: N ~
;5 9 >
CJ~<C
-< .. m
ClJ=lt:~
fI.I ~ CD
~ l"IJ
u~
N
'0 0
~ 0
~~~
c.. ~
;;;l ~
N
..., g
B ~
= V)
Q(:;:j
......
<
~I
N
o
OCl.l
~~
---.
......
......
N
o
OCl.l
~~
---.
......
......
'"
S
'-!'l
;0
8
~
CI.l
N
o
~ <,
~~
N
......
'"
s::
o
'-!'l
;.a
S
u
~
'"
,...
o
o
~CI.l
o~
~~
N
CI.l
~
~
CI.l
~
~
~
z
o
o
o
s::
o
Z
,...
o
o
~
o
~
N
'"
S
'-!'l
;0
S
u
~
CI.l
N
o
~u
Vi ~I
---.
N
......
U
~I
~
~
o
o
s::
o
Z
N
o
o
~
V)
---.
N
......
.~
-
;.a
s
u
~
CI.l
,...
o
s~
:::::0
N
~
~
o
~
z
o
o
o
s::
o
Z
N
o
o
N
---.
1.0
---.
N
......
J!l
s::
~
o
U
o
Z
N
o
OCl
~~
~E-<
N
......
,...
o
o
~~
~~
---.
N
N
o
OCl.l
~~
---.
......
......
N
o
OCl.l
~~
---.
......
......
Cl
~
E-<
~
<I
~
~
~
o
o
s::
o
Z
o
~
::r:
o
~
::r:
o
s::
o
Z
o
s::
o
Z
~
z
o
o
r')
'+-<
o
N
o
~
il..
N
o
o
N
---.
V)
---.
N
......
~
~
o
o
s::
o
Z
o
s::
o
Z
N
o
o
N
---.
1.0
---.
N
......
,...
o
o
~
r---
~
N
N N N N N N N N N N N
.... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
II> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- ~ N N N ~ N N N N N ~
= ---. ---. ---. ---. ---. ---. ---. ---.
Q r--- r--- r--- r--- r--- r--- r--- r--- r--- r--- r---
---. ---. ---. ---. ---. ---. ---. ---. ---. ---. ---.
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
- ~
s:: u 0
.9 o:l .;; ~ ~ ~
- S- o 0 0 0
::.:: . o:l ~ .;; -;; .;;
'-' "5 ...... 0 0 0 ~
~~I u u ~ u ~ ~
"1:l ta ~ ....
0 U 'i-i 0 ~ .... ~ u 0
- o:l .;; 0 0 0 ~ -
o:l .... '" - '"
0 0 E-< 0 ~ o:l .;; o:l .-;::
.... eo ~ ~ ~ '"
U o:l ~ ~ o(l >
~ .S "1:l .;:: '" ta "1:l ~ :'5!
o:l u 0 eo s:: 0 0
.... 0 0 0 0 o:l 0 .::l o:l "0 -
~ O~ > ...:l ...:l - CZi
~ CI.l ~ p... CI.l
0 1.0 V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-0 r') ...... ...... 1.0 V) ...... N M ~ ~
'-' ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ......
.... < < < 0 0 0 0 0 0 <
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
...:l ...:l ...:l ...:l ...:l ...:l ...:l ...:l ...:l ...:l
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
,.,., :E
g <
C"l 00
00 M
~ ~
01
t)JlQ'l
.S ~ c
...... =
l:I:l~>
.... ~ .J
~ I al
N
~g>-
~ N ~
;5 :3 ~
~~<(
<..al
~=!:I:O
l:I:l QJ N
~ fI.l (Q
U~
~~I
-0
u
....
:::c:..;
"0
Cl)
>
'Q)
u
= ~
.S! s:::
- 0
Q., .-
.- ......
... ~
... u
~ ~
~ 0..
0..
<
o
.....
o
<
o
.....:l
>I...
eE8
~ ..5 'm ;:;:;
g..... <l) ~
<l) "O~-B12
-B Cl)o-5g
... -Bu\ii"O
oS ..<::.{gl:<l)
8 ug.s-B 2.i
~~~tfW3~
~ .: E~ ~ g. g
'E d13~3~"O
~ .~8~513
<..::; ~ E {/) 8 E'~
8 .fii~"8lrl g.~
.~ 1a~~~~]
;g, P.. '""":' >..;; 8 .~
0.. <l)U..o~ s:::
03 ~ .-:=Q:)s:::Cl)..!!..o
s:: <l) {/) .0-..0;:3
'I'"_ -"" Cl) ~ 'v; ;::: ,- CI) ~
OJJ -.:> ..c:.~ {/) >< I C
> 'B ~ .~ ~ ~ .:: 'E .-: ~ ~ ~l1.l
;;><l)~ p.....c: ..oC"l<l)>
~.;; ~~ C'~ bn~U-B~
I .F: as ~ ;g ~ ~ ~ ~ 'E C"l 8
C"l s:: <U ..... ,_ -.:> 0 0
~ .g ] ..!!.5 ~ 5b 1A .fii ~ 0\ Z
01 CI) 1a p... "'aJ p:: .- .;; ~ 0..-
N .,.(;:; .... . ~ <l) _ <l) N,.-.,
- - ....... C"l p... M "0 ... 0....0 - ~
>.
..0
13
5b
'v;
l
--<
1:3
'l:
o
'S
--<
B
....
.~
"0
!E
:r.
~
~
''l
o
~~
g~
---
C"l
''l
o
o
~~
~:E
.....
~
~
:E
~
6
o
~
Z
o
o
Cl)
s:::
o
Z
Cl)
s:::
o
Z
C"l
o
o
C"l
0;
---
C"l
.....
''l
o
o
C"l
---
\0
~
.....
''l
o
o
~
o
~
C"l
C"l
o
o
C"l
---
r--
---
.....
.....
C"l
o
o
C"l
---
r--
---
.....
.....
~
Cl)
.;;
Cl)
p::
~
.S
s:::
o
N
~
Cl)
.;;
Cl)
p::
~
.S
~
u
{/)
"0
s:::
~
.....:l
C"l
.....
o
o
o
.....:l
>I...
'<t
.....
o
o
o
.....:l
~
]
't:
Cl)
0..
~
~
{/)
U
;.g .
6~
..o.g
g<+-
._ 0
!9.f'
~,s
~ ,~
.~ .5
~ "bl
g-'5h
13.@
~.-
.....0
]]
;:3;":::
{/) ~
] g.
ZE
''l
o
o
~~
::: E-< I
---
C"l
~
E-<
o
.....:l
o
::r:
Cl)
s:::
o
Z
''l
o
o
~
.....
.....
---
C"l
C"l
o
o
C"l
---
r--
---
.....
.....
~
Cl)
.;;
Cl)
p::
c;
......
s:::
~
o
....
.;;
s:::
~
C"l
'<t
o
o
o
.....:l
~
-g
;g
I
<l)
...
~
B
~
.g
~
s::
.~
~
''l
g~
~
o
M
---
C"l
~
~
~
Z
o
o
Cl)
s:::
o
Z
''l
o
o
C"l
---
C"l
.....
---
C"l
C"l
o
o
~
r--
---
.....
.....
~
Cl)
.;;
Cl)
p::
....
Cl)
......
{/)
~
:E
....
o
-e
~
::r:
o
01
o
o
o
.....:l
~
e
~
i>
:~
u
<<:
1A
'"
u
M
<+-
o
""
Cl)
t?P
p...
.,,'~I-",,~~
"'.:.~""l\>""
. ."...:1, ~,.,'.~..-,"""',. ' ......
,,- "--Vi....... .__
.... - - ll,.~ 1l~
- , ..'....~
-:..........\. .........'. ".'~
-.71i:.....,'t~~.
-........~TE~... .;'
':If If ,
.Conditions Associated With .
Case #: FLD2002-11039
1/8/2003
9:52:54AM
Fire Condition Warn J C FIR1
DRAFT CONDITION: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to issuance of any permits.
LRR1
Land Resource Condition Warn NOT MET 12/5/2002 R A
Tree survey is inacturate and incomplete, revise prior to building permit.
LRR1
12/5/2002
RA
PNR1 Parks & Recs Condition Warn NOT MET PNR1 12/27/2002 DWR
A $200 Recreation Facility impact fee is due prior to building permit for each 'new' residential unit. Verification is
needed on existing structure, specifically # of hotel/motel guestrooms, to receive credit. 4 hotel/motel rooms = 1
residential unit
STRM Storm Water Condition HwO MET 12/20/2002 EES
1) Sub drain details(met)
2) 2' of media between bottom of pond and subdrain required(before permit)
3) l' from center of subdrain to water table(met)
TER1 Traffic Eng Condition Warn NOT MET TER1 12/11/2002 C M
a)Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
Page I of 1
CaseConditions..rpt
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Richter, Debbie
Friday, December 27,20023:15 PM
Wells, Wayne
RE: FLD2002-11 039/PL T2002-11 003, 620 Bayway Blvd
Revised comment below noted in Permit Plan:
"A $200 Recreation Facility impact fee is due prior to building permit for each 'new' residential unit. Verification
is needed on existing structure, specifically # of hotel/motel guestrooms, to receive credit. 4 hotel/motel rooms =
1 residential unit"
nmOriginal Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Albee, Rick; Bertels, Paul; Carrier, AI; Colbert, Joseph; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Martens, Cory; Melone,
Donald; Parry, Mark; Richter, Debbie
Subject: FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-11003, 620 Bayway Blvd
Revised plans are in. A copy is on the cabinets behind my desk next to Rm. 216. Please come by and take a look at the
re-submission. Your comments from the 12/12/02 DRC are below. Please revise your comments in Permit Plan as
appropriate and let me know via email.
Please review ASAP. This case is scheduled for the 1/21/03 COB meeting.
Thanks, Wayne
9:45 a.m. Cases: FLD2002-11 039 and PL T2002-11 003 - 620 Bayway Boulevard (The Moorings I).
Applicant: The Moorings Townhomes.
Representative: Roland Rogers.
Location: 0.33-acres located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 1,300 feet east of Gulf Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 285A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback along
Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to
building and pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building and pavement) and from 10
feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), as part ofa
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; Flexible Development approval of a
six-slip, multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601 and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots.
Proposed Use: A six-unit attached dwelling development with swimming pool and six-slip, multi-use docks (The
Moorings I).
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Wayne Wells, Lisa Fierce, Frank Gerlock, Bill Morris, Glen Bahnick, Joe Colbert, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee,
Applicant/Representative: Roland Rogers, Shivam Patel, Deborah Harris, Jeffrey Izzo, Patty Stough
The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments:
1. Planninl!:
a)
b)
c)
Submit the original "Affidavit to Authorize Agent" signed by Branko Besedic.
Please submit the application fee of$600.00 for the Preliminary Plat. Paid by applicant
Revise either the site plan sheet C2.1 to match the dock design (length, size, etc.) as submitted by Woods
Consulting or revise the submission by Woods Consulting to match the site plan sheet C2.1. Ifless than 500
square feet, the docks will not be part of the Flexible Development request. Docks are less than 500 square feet
2. Traffic ene:ineerine::
a) Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
b) Show driveway dimensions to raised stoops prior to D.O. to be clarified
c) Driveway radii intrude on adjoining properties. Will accept a flair
1
3.
.
.
Stormwater:
a) Subdrain details, prior to cdb need more information on filter system
b) 2' of media between bottom of pond and subdrain required, prior to cdb
c) l' from center of sub drain to water table, prior to cdb
Solid waste:
a) All items appear to be satisfied, using black barrels, will need to take off the street
5. Parks and Recreation: Less eight units (will need $200/unit - recreation facility prior to building permit.
6. Landscapine::
a) No comments
7. Land resource:
a) Tree survey is inaccurate and incomplete, missing some trees and incorrectly listed, prior to building permit,
need to pick up trees within 25 feet of property line.
10 inch oak tree on east side of site, need to show on revised survey - good condition and worthy of saving;
if within five feet of trench line for water line, relocate water/fire to west property line - prior to cdb
8. Harbor Master: no comments, no dock impact on navigation
9. Fire:
4.
b)
a) DRAFT CONDITION: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to issuance of any permits.
10. Environmental:
a) Need submerged aquatic vegetation/benthic survey performed by qualified biologist in vicinity of docks - need
documentation to verify that there are no sea grasses.
b) Recommend use organic material (some herbicide materials are toxic to sea grasses, etc);
11. General ene:ineerine::
a) A clean out is required to be installed at property line per City Standards and Specifications for sanitary sewer
connection, prior to building permit.
b) No more than one sanitary sewer service "wye" per unit, prior to building permit
c) Need to loop new water main, prior to building permit
d) Why not open cut road instead of jack and bore?
PLT2002-11003 for final plat COMMENTS:
a) Need to grant with this plat an ingress/egress for the residents/guests crossing lot lines;
b) What is the area shown seaward of seawall? Listed as common area for maintenance access;
c) Ifnew 6" water main is installed along the right-of-way and private property, a water main easement will be
required.
d) Street name: "Bayway" should be one word.
e) Plat for Bayside #5 shows two bearings, one for Lot 9 and 10. New plat shows one?
f) Curve data table: Chord distance for curve #7? Rear lot line for Lot 6 shows 19.96'.
g) No building permits until evidence of recording of final plat is provided
NOTES:
* 15 sets of revised plans, application, etc are due to Planning by Friday, December 20th for review by CDB on
January 21, 2003
* Email commentstoRolandRogersatriroe:ers16@aol.com<mailto:riroe:ers16@aol.com>
2
~ '...... II
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Martens, Cory
Friday, December 20, 2002 5:22 PM
Wells, Wayne
RE: FLD2002-11 039/PL T2002-11 003, 620 Bayway Blvd
Traffic - changes made in PP.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Albee, Rick; Bertels, Paul; Carrier, AI; Colbert, Joseph; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Martens, Cory; Melone,
Donald; Parry, Mark; Richter, Debbie
Subject: FLD2002-11039jPLT2002-11003, 620 Bayway Blvd
Revised plans are in. A copy is on the cabinets behind my desk next to Rm. 216. Please come by and take a look at
the re-submission. Your comments from the 12/12/02 DRC are below. Please revise your comments in Permit Plan
as appropriate and let me know via email.
Please review ASAP. This case is scheduled for the 1/21/03 CDB meeting.
Thanks, Wayne
9:45 a.m. Cases: FLD2002-11039 and PLT2002-11003 - 620 Bayway Boulevard (The Moorings
I).
Applicant: The Moorings Townhomes.
Representative: Roland Rogers.
Location: 0.33-acres located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 1,300 feet east of Gulf Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 285A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to pennit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback along
Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet
(to building and pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building and pavement) and
from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; Flexible Development
approval of a six-slip, multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-60 I and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots.
Proposed Use: A six-unit attached dwelling development with swimming pool and six-slip, multi-use docks (The
Moorings I).
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Wayne Wells, Lisa Fierce, Frank Gerlock, Bill Morris, Glen Bahnick, Joe Colbert, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee,
Applicant/Representative: Roland Rogers, Shivam Patel, Deborah Harris, Jeffrey Izzo, Patty Stough
The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments:
1. Plannin2:
a) Submit the original "Affidavit to Authorize Agent" signed by Branko Besedic.
b) Please submit the application fee of $600.00 for the Preliminary Plat. Paid by applicant
c) Revise either the site plan sheet C2.1 to match the dock design (length, size, etc.) as submitted by Woods
Consulting or revise the submission by Woods Consulting to match the site plan sheet C2.1. If less than
500 square feet, the docks will not be part of the Flexible Development request. Docks are less than 500
square feet
2. Traffic en2ineerin2:
a) Transportation Impact Fee to be detennined and paid prior to e.O.
b) Show driveway dimensions to raised stoops prior to D.O. to be clarified
c) Driveway radii intrude on adjoining properties. Will accept a flair
3. Stormwater:
a) Subdrain details, prior to cdb need more information on filter system
b) 2' of media between bottom of pond and subdrain required, prior to cdb
c) l' from center of subdrain to water table, prior to cdb
1
..
I
4.
.
.
Solid waste:
a) All items appear to be satisfied, using black barrels, will need to take off the street
Parks and Recreation: Less eight units (will need $200/unit - recreation facility prior to building permit.
Landscaoinl!:
a) No comments
Land resource:
a) Tree survey is inaccurate and incomplete, missing some trees and incorrectly listed, prior to building permit,
need to pick up trees within 25 feet of property line.
b) 10 inch oak tree on east side of site, need to show on revised survey - good condition and worthy of saving;
if within five feet of trench line for water line, relocate waterlfIre to west property line - prior to cdb
8. Harbor Master: no comments, no dock impact on navigation
9. Fire:
a) DRAFT CONDITION: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to issuance of any permits.
Environmental:
a) Need submerged aquatic vegetationJbenthic survey performed by qualified biologist in vicinity of docks -
need documentation to verify that there are no sea grasses.
b) Recommend use organic material (some herbicide materials are toxic to sea grasses, etc);
General enl!ineerinl!:
a) A clean out is required to be installed at property line per City Standards and Specifications for sanitary
sewer connection, prior to building permit.
b) No more than one sanitary sewer service "wye" per unit, prior to building permit
c) Need to loop new water main, prior to building permit
d) Why not open cut road instead of jack and bore?
PLT2002-11003 for [mal plat COMMENTS:
a) Need to grant with this plat an ingress/egress for the residents/guests crossing lot lines;
b) What is the area shown seaward of seawall? Listed as common areafor maintenance access;
c) If new 6" water main is installed along the right-of-way and private property, a water main easement will be
required.
d) Street name: "Bayway" should be one word.
e) Plat for Bayside #5 shows two bearings, one for Lot 9 and 10. New plat shows one?
f) Curve data table: Chord distance for curve #71 Rear lot line for Lot 6 shows 19.96'.
g) No building permits until evidence of recording of final plat is provided
5.
6.
7.
10.
11.
NOTES:
* 15 sets of revised plans, application, etc are due to Planning by Friday, December 20th for review by CDB on
January 21, 2003
* Email commentstoRolandRogersatrirol!ersI6@jaol.com<mailto:rirol!ersI6@jaol.com>
2
Pinellas County Property APpr.r Information: 17291505004001 00.
Page 2 of5
17 / 29 / 15 / 05004 / 001 / 0090
09-Dec-ZOOZ Jil"l Sl"Iith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:Z7:1O
Non-Residentia.l P rope rt9 Address. Use. and Sa.les
COl"lparable sales value as Prop Addr: 6Z0 BAYIJAY BLlJD
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t : Z60.0Z
sales frol"l 2000 - 2001 :
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (lJual/UnlJ) Vac/Il"lp
Plat Inforl"lation 11/Z.00Z lZ. 346/1. 32:8 1. 450.000 (Q) I
1955: Book 038 Pgs 038-039 4 /1. 99Z 7. 8n/Z. 146 960.000 (Q) I
0000 : Book Pgs - 7 /1.988 6.788/1. 587 600.000 (Q) I
0000: Book Pgs - 3 /1.983 5.49Z/ 366 600.000 (C) I
2002 Value EXEMP T IONS
Just/Market: 8Z5.000 HOl"lestead: 0 Ownership 1 . 000
Historic : 0 Use 1: . 000
Assessed/Cap: 8Z5.000 Tax Exel"lpt 1: . 000
Other Exel"lp t : 0
Taxable: 8Z5.000 Ag r icu 1 tural : 0
2002 Tax Inforl"lation Land In forl"lat ion
District: CIJ Seawall: Frontage: Ba9
C.learllJater View:
02 Millage: 2:3. Z911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: 19.2:15.16
1) lZl x lZO 45.00 14.5Z0.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 . 00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Hol"les 4) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
19.Z15.16 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Wi thout any exel"lptions, Total Land Value: 653.400
2002 taxes will be :
19.2:15.16
Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. 5 BLK A. LOTS 9 AND 10 at RIP
Description RTS (LYING IN S 8-2:9-15)
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbin/cgi -scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/9/2002
Pinellas County Property APpr.r Information: 1729 1505004001 00.
Page 3 of5
17 / 29 / 15 / 05004 / 001 / 0090 :01
09-Dec-ZOOZ Ji~ s~ith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:Z7:10
Co~~ercial Card 01 of 1 I~prove~ent Type: Hote1/Hote1 < 4 St
Property Address: 6Z0 BAYWAY BLUD Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39
Structural Elements
Foundation
Floor Syste~
Exterior Wall
Height Factor
Par ty Wall
Structural Fra~e
Roof Fra~e
Roof Cover
Cabinet & Mill
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
Partition Factor
Continuous footing
S1ab on Grade
Conc B1ock/Stucco
o
None
None
Gab1e 81 Hip
Celllent Ti1e
Average
Carpet COlllbination
P1aster furred
o
Heating & Air Heating81Coo1ing Pckg
Fixtures 45
Bath Tile
Electric
Shape Factor
Quali ty
Year Built
Effective Age
Other Depreciation
Function Depreciation
Econo~ic Depreciation
Wa11 On1y
Above Average
Rectang1e
Average
1. 957
Z3
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 4.185 7) .00 0
2) Open Po rch .30 1.015 B) .00 0
3) Detached Utility .45 180 9) .00 0
4) Upper Stry Base Area .90 1. Z96 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Commercial Extra Features
Description D i~em:s ions Price Units Value RCO Year
1) ASPHALT 15XZOO 1. 00 3.000 0 3.000 999
2) PATIO/DECK 600Sf 7.50 600 0 1. 800 1.977
3) DOCK 1344Sf 15.00 1. 344 0 8.060 1.977
4) POOL 544Sf Z5. 000.00 1 0 10.000 1.977
5) SHUfBDCT 300Sf 750.00 1 0 750 999
6) PATIO/DECK lZ00Sf Z.50 1. ZOO 0 1. ZOO 1.977
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: Z4.81O
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][f]~r3J
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/9/2002
..........."" '"""............-........J --... -.."'1"'......_...... -,,_... - ......... .........v -"''''J ""... -...""....... '1'...."'''''..., .a. ...""......,.,......., 1'1'......... ......""...,.,... y"'v.l....'" .1.1"'"'1..1..1.1.613 V.I.I .a. u~"UA.J'
January 21, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in Commission Chambers, third floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola
A venue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishinl! to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetinl!. Those
cases that are not contested bv the applicant. staff, neil!hborinl! property owners, etc. will be placed on a
consent al!enda and approved bv a sinl!le vote at the bel!inninl! of the meetin!!.
1. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Decade 80-XIV (Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC) - flexible development approval to
increase the height of a building with attached dwellings from 30 feet to 149 feet (as measured from base flood
elevation), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C, and to reduce the
buffer width along the north property line from 10 feet to 5 feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the
provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: 146 attached condominium dwellings, 8 attached townhome dwellings,
120-slip marina [73 public slips and 43 slips reserved for condos] and 7,500 square-foot nonresidential uses
[restaurant/ship's store/marina office]) at 900 North Osceola Ave., J.A. Gorra Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-3; Sue Barco Sub,
Lots 1, 13-14 & 22-23; and F. T. Blish's Sub, Lots 1-3 & 8-10. 'FLD2002-10036. (TO BE CONTINUED TO
DATE UNCERTAIN)
2. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Peter J. Hunt, TRE - flexible development approval to terminate the status of a
nonconforming structure to permit an existing 18.5-foot rear/waterfront (east) setback (to building) where a 25-foot
setback is required, under the provisions of Sec 6-109. (Proposed Use: Existing detached dwelling with an 18.5-foot
rear setback to building) at 849 Harbor Island, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 6D, 7 A, 7C, Lot 44. FLD 2002-
10034
3. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc. - flexible development application to revise a
master site plan previously approved by the City Commission in 1995 and subsequently amended by the Conununity
Development Board in January 2000 and October 2002, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
including the following requests (* indicates previously approved site development standards as part of the original
Master Plan and subsequent amendments by the Conununity Development Board):
· Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to pavement)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to existing auxiliary shop)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing Powell Cancer Pavilion)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Druid Road from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement);*
· Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to 10 ,feet (to building);*
· Reduction in front (east) setback along South Fort Harrison Avenue from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Magnolia Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
· Reduction in side (east and west) setback along the Pinellas Trail right-of-way from 25 feet to five feet (to
pavement)*;
· Reduction in side setback along all other sides from 25 feet to 15 feet*;
· Increase in height of a parking garage from 50 feet to 59 feet*;
· Increase in height of a medical clinic from 30 feet to 45 feet*;
· Increase in the height of a hospital building from 50 feet to a maximum of 103 feet*.
(Proposed Use: Changes to an approved Master Plan including improved stormwater facilities, the addition of
property enlarging the campus, the replacement and/or enlargement of seven buildings and the addition of three
parking garages) at 300 Pinellas St., Sec 21-29-15, M&B's 12.01, 12.02, 12.03, 12.12, 12.15,21.01,21.02 & 21.03;
Magnolia Park, Blk 35 Lots 1-9 & Lots 14-22 and E 10 ft ofa 60 ft abandoned RR right-of-way; Magnolia Park, Blk
38, Lots 1-8 inclusive and 1/2 vac streetN, Lots 15, 16, 17, 18-22 inclusive; Bluff View, Lots 16-26 & E 31 ft of Lot
27 and less 10 ft vac alley adj on Riess E; Milton Park, Blk 5, Lots 1-6 & N 1/2 vac alley adj on S; Milton Park, Blk
7, Lots 1-7 and vac alley between Lots 2-7 and N 1/2 vac alleyadj S of Lot 1; S.J. Reynold's Sub., Lots 1-5 & N 20
ft of Lot 6, Lot 7-9; J.B. Roberts Sub, Lots 1-2 & 1/2 vac alley on E less road. in NW corner SD Lot 1, Lots 3-5 &
7-11 inclusive and vac alley between & pt unnm lot ofPoms Park lying S; Poms Park, E 93.68 ft of unnumbered
tract S of Pinellas Ave & N 1/2 of vac St. on S; Petzold Gulf View, Lot 3 & part of Lot 2 & 4; Turners AC Add to
Milton Park Blks A&B & 1/2 vac st on N; Heart and Vascular Pavilion, Conunercial Condo - Conunon Elements;
Westover, Blk A, Lots 1-22 & vac rds on E & S; Westover, Blk B, Lots 1,2,3 and Lot 7 and W 14 ft of Lot 6 and
Lots 8-17 & vac Pinellas St. adj on N and Lot 4 of Barnes, W.N. Sub, Bluff View Court E 18 ft of Lots 1,7,9,11,
13,15, 17, 19 & 20 W for road, All of Bluff View Court sub including right of ways less 18 ft for Reynolds Avenue
right of way and unplatted land adjacent on W, and Westover Blk B, Lots 4-5 and E 39.3 ft of Lot 6. FLD 2002-
10035
4. Beach Motel Mana!!ement (The Moorings Townhomes) - flexible development approval (1) to permit attached
dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to 3 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), a reduction of
J. '--'u...\:::t~ .l.1I\;. \ ~ 11~ IV~VVII110~ ~ VVVIUIVlll~~} - ~l~^lUll;I U~V~lV}Jll1'l;l1U. a.ppIVV'U l.V p~llllll. a.l.l.Q.\.IUI;IU UW~Jllll!;~ VVIUl a
reduction of the front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to 3 feet (to pavement), reductions of
the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from
10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement) and from 10 to 2 feet (to pool deck) and a reduction of the rear (north)
setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Sec 2-803.C and preliminary plat approval for 6 lots. (Proposed Use: A 6-unit attached dwelling
development with an existing 6-s1ip, multi-use dock) at 674 Bavway Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 19 &
20. FLD 2002-11038/PLT 2002-11002
6. Bril!:htwater Investment Establishment (Angelika Marocordes) - flexible development approval for attached
dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building)
and from 10 feet to 6 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building)
and from 10 feet to 6 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building)
and from 20 feet to 0 feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way,
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C and preliminary plat approval
for 10 lots. (Proposed Use: A 10-unit attached dwelling development) at 161 Bril!:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub No.2,
Lots 14-16 inclusive. FLD 2002-11042/PLT 2002-11005
7. Gus DiGiovanni (Bayway Townhomes, LLC) - flexible development approval (1) to permit attached dwellings
with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback
from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), reductions of the side (west) setback
from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement and building), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to
walkway), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) for a 1O-s1ip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Sec 3-
601; and preliminary plat approval for 11 lots. (Proposed Use: An II-unit attached dwelling project with 10 docks)
at 656 Bayway Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Elk A, Lots 15-18. FLD 2002-11041/PLT 2002-11004
8. Burnaby Welch Corporation - flexible development approval for attached dwellings with reductions of the front
(south) setback from 15 feet to 5 feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to 9 feet (to stairwell), a
reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from
10 feet to 5 feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway) and an
increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet (as measured from base flood elevation), as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: A IS-unit attached dwelling
development with an existing II-slip dock) at 692 Bavwav Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 21-23. FLD
2002-11043
9. Carlouel Yacht Club - flexible development approval for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet by 250
feet floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to 6 feet,
under the provisions of Sec 3-601. (Proposed use: A 10-foot wide by 250-foot long floating dock [adjacent to
seawall]) at 1091 Eldorado Ave., Mandalay Replat, Blk 171, Lots 6-11 and part of Lots 4 & 5. FLD 2002-10033
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the
Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the
Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such
purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review
by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning
Department, 100 S, Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call (727) 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
Planning Department
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500
FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL OFFICIAL RECORDS &
T ,R~T~T.A. TTVR ~F.RVTrR~ WITH THRTR RROTTF.~T A. T (727) '\62_40cn
I "DO../
p;;1 J/JOJ.. (
I '-tft
,~
~A-t?.-tvl-JT13.R-~C-H A5$~
~;;'7 flA N b,4/-....,Q1 A'-IE
~,4e.aJ /fr73:-.e-..J F~ .3 .3 7 ~ 7
FL INT IMP FUND TRE
C/O WELLS. JESSE
2919 WEST BAY DR
BELLEAIR BLUFFS FL
:~5?;'7"?() ~?6t:'?1
FELDMAN. MARVIN J
r:::ELD1"'j(')I"J." L I ND{:\
L:'?3 BrlYSIDE DR
CLE(~F\~I/"I()TER FL..
~5~)7 c>'7 ~? .S()~2
ALCALDE. RICHARD
1620 LEEDS CASTLE
I j"',j[) I ~~N() \,i(.')
~(2.lf~~?
OSK(-lRSSON " LE I F
OSKARSSON. CYNTHIA
,1,-11 S(\YSIDI::: DI~
CL[()r-~I,io)(iTE:F~ FL,
:~; ~5 '7 l~' 7'
j"1(.)Rl<.tJS. DOi",.j()I_D S
r-i('IRl<,US" 1'1(~IF~ lEE
441 S ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
ELLIS GF~OV[ XL
(,,22,41
E:E3Bf::r'~T" f{(~rHY S
106 WINDWARD POINT
HE:NDERSONVILLC TN
::';;7075 S108
LAGOON RESORT MOTCL
619 SGULFVIEW BLVD
CL,EAr~l""I(..lT[F'~ r:L
:5 ~?) "ll~:) "7 /: (") .4 :~)
LEE. NI.:'tD\,'NE S
908 1,^,1PILL_fiCE
LEITCI-IFIEL.D K'y'
,4 :Zl :" 4,
I",j F.:: s t.'j 0 F.~ I~:\ COR FJ
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD PH 2
CLE()f~I,..,1(~\TEf~ r:::L,
~3 3 '.7 IS '7 :2 l~l '/ ~7
~fll\Jb /~ 'I C!i'-ll(!.., A s'S/v.
/ Lj- It 0 co a....L-. ~ '13 L'" '6 :It=. /CJ p<...
(! Lr::::-/1 e.a/ t4 77.E-e) PL.. 3,3 7 e:, 1
\,"("1:3 I L.,(;~RO~:;;" J (ICI<.,
VASILAROS" SOPHIA
119 B(.)'y'SID[ DF~
CL.F:()r~ll"I(~TEF!. FL,
:3:3 '7 I~~) '7
RO~'lPiGI",!O" \/ I TO
f;'~ 0 t'-i (.~I G [""! 0" (:\ ~'.i N ("I
129 13r'I'y':3JDE DR
C:LEPIR1lJ(iTER FL.
~:; ::;; 7' t:> 7" :~: 5 () ::::
Z I OL,PI" THC)jvir->i3 [3
Z I OL,(:~I. :<,t\THF~'{N 1'1
1 C I F~CLE DF~
t'-iONt'-iOUTH BEACH NJ
07/ :;::,0 11::.::2
BARNHART. RANDALL E
BARNHART. DEBORAH F
143 13A''y'SIDE DR
C::L..E:()Rli,.Ir:~TER FL
?:; ::; 7" () )' ~~:: ,~s () :~~
ALVER30N. LOUISE W
444 t'-iILLERSBURG RD
PI~IRIS i'<'\'
403(:,1 ~2145
DI\,lF:L,L,()" r:IJLVIC)
DIVELLO. MADDALENA
lj <,:]. 5 1-1 () i"1 0 F:: [.,,! DR
CI~E()F1IlJ()r[i~ FL
:~~) ~:~:; ~? () "7 ~~ ,~:;, 3 ~?
t\ c; 1'1 PSS I
C/O DELOITTE & TOUCHE
201 E KENNEDY BLVD STE 1200
T (~t"iF'(~) FL
~?) ?) is () :?
DUDA. NICHOLAS JR
l)tJDA" 1"i(iR'y' ,]
67S GULFVIEW BLVD S W 1201
C L" E: PI F;\,',,1 (:1 T C: R F L,
~:) ::~; "7 6. '7 ~? c:;t ""/';1
FLETCH[R" HARRIET K TRE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD PH 4
C L. I: () R (1,,1 {~r E: h: I~:: L
:~5 ~5 7 (;. "7 ::~ I:':~ "7'7
FL INT IMP FUND TRE
C;O SHEPHARD, WILLIAM TRE
619 S GULFVIEW BLVD
C:LEr)F~I,.,1(':\TEF~ P'L
A C S RESORTS INC
514 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CI..,E(\f11..,1() T[:F~ FI..,
:337'c~ 7' :;?:t~.4::S
:5 ~3 ~l (:' ~? ~? .:::1 ::.;; :3
f'( (..) L, (-~ I",!, B r~ I (\ 1"')' (-~
f<' (-:) L, (':\ N, ,] 0 f'':\ N t",! E 1'1
530-540 GULFVIEW BLVD
CL[:(")Rv.,I(-~TEF~ PL
BL\iD
33)' ~~s "'7
BAYWATCH SUITES INC
(:;,00 fJ (>f \( 1,.\,1 1-':\ 'yo B L, V D
CLE::(")Rlil,lATER FL
~5 ~)'~/1S '7 2~ (" ().1
KOUMOULIDIS, VALENTINOS
1050 OYSTERWOOD ST
1--IOL_L_\'I,I,,100D F:L_
3~SO,lS:' 4::34/
MOOF~ I j".,J.GS ,rHE
9100 BAY HILL BLVD
()RL_f:::li".J.DO FL_
:3 ~2: ~3 .1'))
DI GIOVANNI PARTNERS-8AYWAY
c(.)r~iF~ I Ef1(;\-w[J(-~ YvJ(-~'-(
1,63 Bt-Y't'SIDE DR
CLEARI,I,,1(-~TER PL
CC)TEL II'.{C
6?4 8f.iYV.,1f.':\V SL. VD
C~L,[:()F<ll')(~l TEn j=;:"L
32;;761
.:; ~; '7 (~, '7 :2: I~' () .1
8URNA8Y WELCH CORP
,~,9:2 f:3AYV\I(.:)'y" 13L VD
CI_E()RI,i.,lt~ITE:r~ FL
CENTER FAMILV LTD
C/O AME:RADA HESS conp
PROPER TV Tf.iX DEPT-09439
ONE HESS PL,(iZ(~
I"I,II]ODBF<. I DUE:: I'",!J D701_1 /J2~(
::; ::; ~7 (:;. 7' :~2 {') () 1.
",""\ '....). ,...... C"' t::: -, "") "';'{'~I
f.iNASTASOPOULOS, ELIf.iS
ANASTASOPOULOS, HE:LEN
1600 UULF BLVD ~ PHNO 1
CLEr)R\iJATEf~ j=;:"I..,
srEF US('J I ~"'!C
655 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CLEf~)F~V,,1J~) TE:I~ FL
::5;57' C' '? ~~~ S) '7 ::.;
:~:5~/ 6. '7
CAPE:LUTO FAMILV PTNSHP
c;o ROLL(iND f~~C)>(
28050 US HIGHWAV 19 N STE 10
CLE:(-~F<ll,,1(~ITEf;;: F=L
~5Z)"? (:)1 2c)()()
ANASTASoPoULoS. ELIAS
POLITIS. GREGORV C
630 S GULFVIEW BLVD
CL..,E(>Jf~ll"I(~ Tr:~R FL,
:s ~::; 'X (~ ~?
CAPELUTO FAMILV PTNSHP
c/o ROLLf~ND FOX
28050 US HIGHWAV 19 N STE 10
CLE(iF~ll"IATE:f~ F;:"L
3:::;}61, 2600
ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS
ANASTASOPOULOS. ANASTASIOS
630 S GULFVIE:W BLVD
CLE'(-~RI,',1(~,TF::.F~ FL,
::-:;5)(,} :2:6/i2
SHEPHARD, WILLIAM M TRE
C;O EASLE:V MCCALE:B & ASSoC
619 S GULFVIE:W BLVD
CLEPiF~I,"}(iT[R FL
L,[:i''',!(-~RT" TE:[) TF<~E
LENART. MARIA TRE
LENART FAMILV TRUST
"~,. ';;0 <::, c:; r~'lll F.. \ " 'I E:", I I:::' I \i r')
'-" ".., ....' ',." ..:1,""" Y.. , I , w' f.." , ...', . ?-.
r'I ..W,' F:'I,I """'['f'" 1-' '1 3 . "] 1 b Lt:..;
,,' _I~:,H ... l' (: I ,:::, ,<~ ......:) 7/.". -..
3 :::; ~/ (:~ "7 ~? (, ..4 :~;;
.,7. ".:1:" ...~f ...: '''l ~.~;. ,.:' A "1"
ALPHA BEACH RESORT INC
645 S GULFVIE:W BLVD
CL-E(-~Fil,o\)AT[F~ FL
BAYWAV SHORES CONDO
(i ~3 S 1"'), I j",,! C
;s ~~) '7 ~~s '7 ~~;~ (~ (~l ~)
F' () [~ CI )< ~s ;~3 f~~ :2
CL,E(~F~ll,,1(~IT[f~ FL
~33~;t c) ~l E~}3f~:2
. . .-... ,. ........~, . ~,.... ~:.... ~'" '.~I ~....,
GIAMMATTEI. GUIDO
640 BAYWAY BLVD ~ 104
CL,[()h~I,I,J('ITEF~ F'L
640 BAYWAY BLVD ~ 103
CL[{.)R!,\I(':)TE::F<~ FL
::5~)~;{ 6 '7 2t:,()3
:~s :::::; ~? .::~~ '7 :2 I~;t () :::;;
L :r j'~ I() r~ E:: S" () j"~ T H [I i",! Y
640 BAYWAY BLVD ~ 105
CL.E()Ri,I,,1i'4TER I::::L
SHEFFIELD" MARGARET C
SHEFFIELD, JAMES S
640 BAYWAY BLVD ~ 106
CL"[(~f:;:I,I,Jt,,TEF~ F::L
:3 ::5 '/ l~:~ '7
?:; ~?~:; '7 (~ 'l 2: (:;t () (~;,
HJ'~NI< I NS" JOHt"'l 1'1
640 BAYWAY BLVD ~ 201
CL,E(~RI/II(.~TER FL.
I)E \,IOS" HOBE:F.~r
PC) E:~O>< 4)' ':::,
CL,[{)r11,1,J()TEF~ F'L,
TPi:::
:3 :3 '7 () 7 ~? I~;l () I.~~'
?) ~~; 7 .:;1 "/' Cl (~j. .)'. '~;l
:r (~) i",,! IS" ,J 0 1"1 i"",!
10300 S LONG AVE
O{)f{ L,r()!....IN I L
{;'04S:'5 4<'::,43
CONPAD. RONALD J SR
3()1 BO~",!NET DR
EA~:.~T DIJBIJC!UE I L,
12;' .1 C) ~(~ ,~S 1S'~ E~ ;2 :::5
WAGNER" WILLIAM H
WAGNER, ,JOSEPHINE C
559 LORING VILLAGE CT
CJ F~ (.~ ~"! G E FJ (.:) F.~ 1<: F L
D () L. f< I ~",!" ,] PI t1 E: S t"'i
640 BAYWAY BLVD ~ 206
CLE:()F~I/"I(~TF;f~ FL,
::::~~2()7:3
:..; :5 '7 (~ "7 :? I~S, () lj.
PUSSELL. SHELDON P
1415 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN
55120 1002
MC MULLIN, DONALD J
MC MULLIN. MARGAPET U TPE
500 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVD ~ 62
i,I.,1 I L. D I,,") 0 [I D t,.,! ,J
() 8 ~? I~) () E:, E~ I);' .1.
VU,] I C" GF:~OZDJ'~"N
3321 SAWMILL VALLEY DR
MISSISSAUGA ON L5L 3C9
C PJt"1r-~ D A
i",'10::3C(~, t\~'.!TO I NE [:
t"iOSCp,,, L('ft'",!(~ L
ISl::. t'1CC(-itJI_E"( F~I)
C;:LE(\R~'J(~TEF( FL
3 :~; '7 ,~::~ ~S .1.5 .1 ;~:
1,h,IOOD~:;" Nor:::L D
640 DAYWAY BLVD ~ 305
CLE()F~I/,)(.~ TEf'~ F'L
FOL.F\-"" BETH(~~',!y :::i
FOLEV" ,]()HH r-l:
640 BAYWAY BLVD ~ 306
C L. E I~:) F:: 1"',,1I~~l r:: F;: F L
::~; ~3 7 (~l 7' 2 (;l () ,S
~S:3'7 6, '7 :2 ,~:> () ,~s
VUJ I C" VEPPi
640 BAYWAY BLVD ~ 303
CL,E(~lRI/,J(.~TEF~ FL_
BENDERLY. ZVI TPE
Dl5 !'\) EbiD A\/'E:.
N E 1,1,,1 YO h' K t,,! ''('
10():::::::~) 49,19
!:. 3; '7 I~~~ '7 :2 (;t () !S
(C\f'iDPOSD" [)()/"J, I EL
Ar"'iOPOSO" JE(.~N
201 WILTSHIPE RD
I/,)V'NHF:::I,I)OOD p~~
KAMINSKAS. STEVEN W
l<(;~t"j I f',lSf<'PIS" L.E I S()
,:jj",J,160 H(ll,..,1THORNE
[3EN~3E:~',,!\i I L.LE I L
60106 2;:;:5 ,(j, :::;
l,S'() S) t:;l ~533~?
~-;P(~GNOL()" ~JDHt',!
SPAGNOLA. ROSALYN C
615 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 204
CL,E(.~f~I.tJ{~TEF~ FL,
:'53761 2646
DE: VITA" MICHAEL J
DE \i I T ()', HEl"Et".l C:
224 l<.CL.L'y' ElLVD
:5; T PI TEN 1 :3 L (.~ t'.~ [) i"",! \"
1031.,1
CONTINENTAL TOWERS INC
HOL,T., DOUGL_(:\S
239 N MILL RO ~ 203A
()DD I SO~,.j I L.
60.101
~'0 ~ ~ULrVLCW bLVU IT 301
C '-_ [ I:'.) F<: 1.....1 f:.i '1" E I;: F: L
:3 ~5~? (;t"7 :? (;1 <.:1- (,
CICCARELLO. LAURENl S
CICCARELLO. JUDY
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 302
CI_Ef;:)f~I^)()TF:R F'L
MONCRIEFZ. J SCOT1
MONCRIEFF. SUZANNE S
5 TOf....iOl.<.i~) I.,/IEl^J DR
or~:~"iC)~',J,[) BE(lCH FL.
3257 e;. "if ::~ t) <.:1. (:;1
:?S ~? .1. ~? ..<1- :5 f3 .S .1
CHIAPPA. JOSEPH M
f'IOOVEF~" FF~{-)N}<~ F-<
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 304
Cl._E()RI/')i'iTER FL
~:,AL..L()S. LCL('I
4 i3()'( \/IEI/..I erR
S () 1_ E "'1 [vj (\
().1970 26::50
:3 ~3 ~'f ,~:) '., ;::: tl ~~. <:::;t
S f'IE 1/.) A. ~'1 i~ f"'J, 0 ,J H
[) I PI. f'1(iStWI(i i~
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 306
CLE()RJ..\I()TEF~ r'L
::1<:::1<:*******.*:
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 307
C L.. EAR 1/..1 (:)T E F: F'L.
:~;:3~76 7 ~26E~,7
(:) !) '7 (. ~l ~2 () .~~:, )'
PETRIK. CONSTANCE C TRE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 308
C: L. E: f:.i F~ V,J (~I T E r~ [.:: L
f'1 E 'y' E: R. J (j f"'j E ::::; (.\1
~"iE'y'EF~. L.. I h!Df~j K
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 401
eLEf;:)F~V..li~rER FL.
~:) 3 '7 ~~s. '7 ::~~ ,~) ~~~I "?
?~ ::~; ~;.( (:; 7 :2 'S .~;::l "7
KUDF:f~. R I CH(iRD C
KUDF:R. JOSEPHINE M
.12524 COf3BL.Ef~ L.N
()LLENTOI/,.IN P{)
L8J.04 (?J220
OFSTEDAL.. IRVIN J
OFSTEDAL. LUCIL.LE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 403
CLE(iFi:I,I)f4TEf;~ f=L
:3 3 7 ~:) '7 ~::: (::;t .:;. ~7
I",IOLFE" JOHI",.! ~i
E,01 ER I E (iVE:
TnhP() FL.
1..1) E Ci" }<. () R L
'/..IEU" i""i(~P J ()
.1501 GULF BLVD ~ 807
C L. E:: () R 1/,,1 (~IT E r~: r-:c L_
;s 3 (~() (:;1
3 ?::; ~'l (:~~ 'l :2 '9 () ~)
SCHAFFEP. GEORGE A
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 406
C~LE()Rll,,1(4TF:r-~ FL.
?;;3'7 (~7 ~?6,5 ~1
(,',JnZIO" IREf"jE:
1/~(iZ I 0" E:IJGEf"~E
5511 S KOhENSKY ST
CHICf;iCiO IL
(;t () (:;t :t~ '9 ~<l ,41.::1
h.F:::LTY" J'f;:li"1ES SR
f<.EL..TY" ~3tJ;:;;(')N
~3(',)94 NPIP I EF~ PD
C~'iNTON HI
LOVITZ. J'ULIUS L TRE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 501
CL.E(.jr-~:V..I(;'ITE:R FL.
~:l (3 J.~ f.~~ '/ .:::1- .:> ~2 [~
?; ;) ~l ~~:;t )Y :2 I~:~ E) 7
F1FUCE" TIM [::::
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 502
C~LE:()RI..IJ{)TER FL
ZE I CR" j....J,OF?ElEF:T G
ZEICR. HARGARET C
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 503
C:::LE(')F~:I.^.I(~TER I::'l._
:3;::5 )' 61 '7
2) :~:~; ~l "~;t '7 :2 6 (S ()
G()RB IS" t'lt...jTf-IONY
GnRBIS. ANTOINETTE
20'4 S vrf'"J,[ sr
H I f".!SD~'iL.E I L.
,::,0::;21 40-.::1:?
[30~;;Th~Oi1" EF,: I h.
SUNDQUIST" BRITTA
I \/()n UEFi:Gr::ns V{lCi
4:.5()6:3 :-1 I ~'.!DP:S
Sli.,1E:DE:N
f"iORELL I. i....j(~F~'\( n
6.7.<;;, ~;;~ (:)111 r.-~\'l'1'r~I,.1 K:;'I I,'f',
.B' l:'~ ....... I
BL_('II<F!.L. \( "
aCJSEPH [;
TF;~E
...... ....... ...~.. .....1 ....... I,.... I ','..1.. C. v~, D L 'If L,..r ff' .~) I,) i~:S
675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 60.1
C L. E () F~: 1..,..1 Pi T C f~ F L
eL[(if~~ll..lf-iTEr-< FL
33767 2666
;) 3 ",Y I~~ 7' 2: (;1 (S IS
MARINI, DOROTHCA
675 S GUL.FVICW BLVD ~ 602
CLCI~IPV.)(CjTI:::~< FL
:5 ::) '7 t~~ '7 ~2 (~I ~) ~~,
ORGF:TTAS, MICHAEL TRE
I' 4 CE~[...J,'rnf~\L, ST
F'EI~iUODY hA
() .1 ':) l~:::> () t.l2~; !:::' '7
ALBER, VIRGINIA L
675 S GULFVICW BLVD # 604
C L. f: ~i F-~ I,.".II~ T C F< r: L.
Fi: (.:>, ["i S C """',, C L.I(:l I P .]
RAMSCY, BAPBARA M
],406 SAINT GOTTHARD AVE
(~b!C::HOpnGE f;~:-<.
:5 ~3 ~? ~S'7 ~2 I~~t () I~)
~:;Il:) ES () :0~ .~~I () .~::. :2
CUNNINGHAM, IRENE A TRE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 606
CL.E::I~RI",IATE::P FL
\lL(~H()S" 1~:Lt1INE
3 :~? r....j (~r F'l L.. E: ~~) 'r
~5:3 7 (',0 '7 :2 ~~IISI ()
V.,1 CST 8 () 13 ""." L. 0 i",! t'J. \(
lll()ij. 7718
CONWAY. E P FAM LTD PTNSP
PO BOX ~5::S18
B(){)nD~'iAf'.J, OH
4 ,,<l~S 1 ~:;;
GF<GUHIC1-j" JOH[',,!
GF<GilJF::r C/'I" f<.i~r I Ctl
5021 W CAROlL AVE
~::;}<.()f<. I [ I L
IS () () '7 ../
MISKEL.. ElIZABf:TH V
675 S GUL.FVIEW BL.VD # 702
CL.E{)PI/')I~i TEF,~ FL.
CHAMBEHS. LARRY W
C H ('I t"'i B E F< ~:)" (~1 ['..J, ["'! ["I
C/O CAPITOL TRAVEL SERV
4 <:):2 's:' ivi 0 t.,..! () (.! ('I D F<:
'.,' ", [) 'J" '''>(''''../ 1'1')' '--" ' ') /., '3' ll.
r II--L., " ...1'. ."., ,') 3 ]I ~ -ex . -,
t::: ":~~' "'';'' ..\.~ ..~':< ...-: ":;::' ....i
::.~ :3 7 (:;1 ~1 ~;~ () t.l ~7
~1 I C H A E: L" (.:l N i"'J, i....1
704.1 BRIDGETOWN RD
CINCINN(>ITI 01"1
i'10h~:'~ll'r I~)., cIIR I Sf
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 705
C:LF~{)R~I,IPlrEI;: Fl
<q,;S::"?48 :2 () ().:.~
:::; :::; 7 () 7 ~t,t~ (, (~l ~l
PANUTHOS. PANIAGOTTA TPE
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 706
C'_E(jF~~...lf:.iTEf:;:: F:'-_
I'<F~ Ir I CO~:), Sni.....i
KRITICOS" ELIZABETH
7 5/ ~"I/:'.) f",J, D n L.I~>I V
eLC{jHI....)(iTEF< FL
~s 3 ~? (:,"7 ~;~~ () (1 7
?~ ~?~ "l (:1 '7 .1. (~l ::~~; 3
Zf:FELIPPO. MARIA R
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 708
C:: L.. r:: (~j PI..") (>1 T E: F< F L
i.....j tl h:T I i.....!,' G (:1 f~7 \' ["j
MAPTIN, BERNICE J
104(. ()F~D[:I'..! Df~
\iIL.L.n HIL,LS f<.Y
41()17 57?7
::~) ::5 ~? 6 ~l :2 I~S <~. '7
KELLER. ELIZABETH M
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 802
C L. E (1 F~ li',1 (iT E F,~ r: L.
() h: Lo" () P F). (~I i"..! IT Pi ivi
675 S GULFVIE:W BLVD # 803
C:: L. E. (>1 P 1/.) (>1 T E F: FL.
:':; ::3 ~ll~) '7 2 I~S /~. 7"
::;:5~l6.~? :261.4'7
NAKIS. MICHELINE
675 S GUL.FVIEW BL.VD # 804
CL.E{.'if~<""II:'.)TEF< F:l
::S~:S767 2647
SGPD I. HI~~)lf.:Jf'l C)
SF;R() I" l_r:il.)F:':(~ J
2781 ST ANDREWS BLVD
TAPPON SPPINGS FL
:3 !.j. ~5. ~3 f.1 (~) ?:; .1 :2
P()PF-1" VINC:Fi',.J,T E
p i~ H F-(. L. U [....! E::: 'yO A
MC DONALD, ROBERT J
["'j C: D D i.....! PI I., D" ~"'i {>, P V'
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD U 808
Cl.~E()r~(I,I(iTEr~ FL
. -, ..... ,,'- -..... ....... ~J 1 11 " , I I '..,.' I -', I ~..J
~~ :3 -, 61 '7
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 901
cL.EARWATER BEACH FL
32;; If (;, ~t
GOHDOi"'j, NOBLE L
3306 SAN DOMINGO ST
cLEAF<~I,~~lTER FL
BARBIERF:. MICHAEL J
BEL..f:;"'[\.!CiEr~. ,] I L,L F<
16~;. Stl'l,ic)U :~:;T
[.'i{~h:G!I..JF::T TE ["1 J
:3~5'?~39 3~:53f.3
i.j. ~) f~ 5:; E, .:) .1 r:) J..
ZHUN, ELLEN M FAMILY TRUST
C/O NASSIF, JANET
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD U 1005
CL,E()H1i,I()TEP FL
U[H~'.!EfT" JO"{c[
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD ~ 905
CL_Enh:I.,..,1(lTF::H FL.
;:.) ::s ~7 ~~:) '7 2~ 6. <,1. .:;4
:::'>::5 7" 6, )1' :2 (. '7 ;:3
VALSAMIDES, GEORGE
VALSAMIDES. GEORGIA
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD U 906
CLE:(')HIN(.)TE.f~ FL,
BRADLEY FELICIA N
122 COUNTRY CLUB DR
,.J A C: f<' S I] i....j \/J: L L. E t....! c::
281:5.46 8.1.42
3 :~) '7 c~ '7 :2 (.~;t '7 f~
POLEMENAKOS. SOTIROS
POLEMEHAKOS. THEOHARI
352 ATLAHTIC AVE
~1 (.'1 f~ f:3 L E H E (>1 D ["'j (.)
01.945 27252
PO'y'" JOllt.,! B
F~O''('" J {\["'![~ S
675 S GULFVrEW BLVD # 1001
CL.[:(~,RI.,..}(jTER FCL
:s ~5 '7 6. '7 2~ 6, ~? f~
F'(iLLS ,. B'y'F?Di....j P
PALL.S. BEATRICE K
3:':?06 HOEDT f~~D
T (:) [....i P (:\ F: L_
GRAcILLA, RAHULFO V
G F~ (:\ C I L. L (:\, t"j f;~ P """, f<.
302 CL.AY FURHACE RD
5:5618 1(~,10
5H()h:F'S\i I LLE P()
1(;.1.:)0 ~Sl.04
HENDERSOH. NEVETA
EISEL.EIN, EL.IZABETH
675 GULFVIEW BLVD U ],004
CLE:i~Rl'Jr)T['::R FL
HASSIF, FREDERICK J
N r~I:3 ::) IF", ,] () I""! [ T L.
675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1005
C L. E: ~; F;~ '...,.1 tl T E r~ F'L
?;3~l(,~l :?(::}4.:;
:?s ~5 )" I::::~ "7 :2 ~) .4 .:::1
DOULAS. GAPIFALIA
304 HUNTSMILL BLVD
SCARBOROUGH ON M.1W 3C8
C~;N(')D(.)
SI~L.ll"'i().]. I :3UF
WILlIAMSBPIDGE STATION
PC) UO>< 9(,.1
13 F<: C) j.'..J, >< ["J, \(
,1. (I ,:::161 '.r
HAYWOOD. MARGARET R TRE
1.150 8TH AVE SW ~ 701
L.{jF<~GO r,~cL
53770
G()[....iE:~Z" P SC:OTr
GOI""iE:Z. t"i(~F~Y L
27],9 OSMUNDSF:N RD
['1 (.) 0 ISO [.,.J, V.,1 I
55711 5::249
MC KERPOW" DONALD C THE
675 S GUL.FVIEW BL.VD U 1102
C L. E: {>, p I,I} f:~ T E:~ P I~:: L.
DOh:iviEh:" ']A~"i[:3 .J
DC)P~1EF,:" DOF~ I::') .]
675 S GULFVIEW I3LVD # 1103
CLE:AF,:I,I.,1P,TEP FL,
?:; :~5 ~l6 7 ~~ () 4. .:;,
::5 ::.; 7' (~ '}' :2 (~l ,:~+ '::1
BARBIERE, JOYCE L TRUST
lS5 B~~)YOU ST
i"i(-.'rr;~OUETT[ ['11
4':;:'e~;,5 9101
L_E COi"'IPTI::" L.Et.,.!P,
1E:,2 1"1 I CiHL.,()~',![) 3T
f3lJCf<.E::\'E:: L.tlf<'E Or'l
1.:'1. :; () () ~3
SILVE::RMAN. DIANE
2.121 BATHURST 5T # 620
1,1 U 13 E:: r;:" i",J, f;>l N C: "/ L
~'::' "7 c:. C', C) i' ~r t..... I tW ~."'I 1"....
J,J"T~~;,-,..
.-'~~AlOF TNt. ~
...~.'~\ '~....r.Q-~ ~),.""..
..~t::::-..' ~.l/ T.....
.. ~ ", I ~r,;...-':.
~c::.s~ ,\ // ..' ~ $
III ~.." ....... "I
",C':t.-=- .... -==c:
..~':. ".~=-~ ~".'
..p:~ == :s.;
-~......=--=- .;~~..
~ ,/:;;,--- ,I.'...... '.'
-.:.. !'J'J. -'--I:JrJ.'~ ~V.'~
~~,~TE~\',."t
"';'1'. ,
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PIANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
March 8, 2004
Mr. Roland Rogers
Rogers Beach Development
P.O. Box 676
Crystal Beach, FL 34681
'*' S\CV:'\for rt..4l\\"'"
-tor (Q,+ ~~~
l'd- ~~ ~\t.)
Minor Revisions to FLD2002-11 039/PL T2002-11 003 - 620 Bayway Boulevard
Re:
Dear Mr. Rogers:
On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with eight
conditions the above referenced case, which was a Flexible Development application to permit
attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction of the front (south) setback from
15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet
(to pavement and building) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), reductions of the side
(west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and a reduction of the rear
(north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval
for six lots.
You have proposed to amend the prior approvals, including the plans approved for building
permits under BCP2003-02084, BCP2003-02087, BCP2003-02088, BCP2003-02089, BCP2003-
02090 and BCP2003-02092, for the following:
1. Delete the open balcony on the second living floor, including the spiral staircase from the
balcony to the roof deck, and replace with additional floor area by enlarging the master
bedroom by approximately 112 square feet. The bay window proposed for this second
living floor will be widened due to this change.
2. Elevator penthouses for the center four units will be eliminated. Only one end unit will
actually have an elevator to the roof deck, which will be enlarged to accommodate a
relocated spiral staircase. To visually balance the building, a similar (fake)
elevator/spiral staircase penthouse is proposed on the other end ofthe building.
3. Air condensing units have been relocated from a lower pedestal area above the front unit
entries to the roof.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR.COMMISSIONER
HoY[ HAMII.TON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BIl.I.JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
March 8, 2004
Rogers - Page 2
In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be minor
revisions and are approved. These minor revisions must be shown on the building plans when
submitting for building permits.
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner, at
727 -562-4504.
~.Y'.i.'. --t~
(\, ,01 e~.O ~
LisVie'rce
AssIstant Planning Director
\\MS5c\PDS\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX\Inactive or Finished Applications\Bayway 620 The Moorings 1- ApprovedlBayway 620 Minor
Revisions Letter 3.8,04.doc
Feb 25 04 03:54p
JUDI KROVICH
7274499256
p. 1
---- ~-" '''- --'-- - .~~ '''''R' ~f"" .., --" .. ,....- {:'-'" - ~~" L .......... .....-1\ .il r"" ..
_ _ _..... ~..3. . :P""~'" ......_..~ .~ ."'-""~.' '- -,"... ".:';" .?;;..';..... -." t" .....-...."r.l>;'l -., ..' ?: .... ~..----...:o: .~: :";: I n. ~- ....H.
.' (,= )i~,;~~:: .r'i, :i '~~.;.i~ t~~..:t\. ';L,~: rei tJ :L: \1 i~~ : . ~f~~~ ~,.~; :c "W 1 ~.~~ :~~:;~''i
P.O. Box 676. CayStol Beach, Florida 34681- 727-512-0468 - 727-789-29fn Fox - rjrogel'5l6@aol.com
To: Wayne Wells
City of Clearwater
Re: Moorings [
Moorings II
620 Bayway Blvd
674 Bayway Blvd
II....-;;l.n rr; (FiT II. \In rr; W'~"l
Ii U) Lf;>' I ;;.y" \'J U; I
iiJQ~o 12004
I f-ck,NIt,G & DE VEI.OPM, NT S vC~
I qf'(OF Cl EARWA1LR
From: Rogers Beach Development
Date: February 25, 2004
Weare requesting the minor revisions to the plans by CBD for Moorings I and Moorings
II be approved.
Moorings I and Moorings II are similar buildings, the changes are reflective of both
buildings.
The following changes are requested.
. Second Living floor - North elevation
Exterior spiral staircase eliminated and Bayway added
(Attached floor plan reflects change)
. Elevator penthouse built on end units of each building
(Attached floor plan reflects change)
. Roof hatch added to Master Bedroom closet for roof access
(Attached floor plan reflects change)
. AC condensing units were relocated to roof
. Electrical disconnect relocated to roof
. Railing to be installed at rooftop of two end units only
...i ;_~:. .~~~..~
.. t 1._'____~_~-~F--..~h4~~ ~
.t -----.. ..... .
_11 _..~ _Lt.$~ ~ J>S'''"o/'''-'''''F
-,:R ~r5 2"004 .
\""t...}
" ~: ~~ 2S/ ~9PY
. _._n i"~1 ..-....-.-.--..-...--. .- ..-----~, ~/.. ,--
III
I
--.. ~_._.._.,.,.. -----_.,--
. ___.. ...UU u_ 'i ._~:_..____.____&~~~-f---~.
i'
II ~
..-.-. _.n fi- - _.n _._._~~~..f . ~
fill
.---- --.----.-~ 1-------------
i,
.---- --- _._---~-.-II .-----------------.--.--....--------- - -------- --
_. ____.....1 /VE .._ ~ .__~fEe.JhAl?--.r~e H/i'r'M, ~/.I/n,J .. T!!_._
.._ __'____ :i ~_____.//~.s ___.~y__ .~~ ~.tL
_.__._.___ . ,8~___#.~~~-~p(-- u__.' _ _.
I
~Z4 ~;;/4'y ~kK
~'Jy ..?~?' ~r"~~n
~~""':1,J :& ~~..#
___._ .._ , I ~~~...!......_ ~_._~~-_ .-!P ~ .s,,,..,,~ ,#e.-N~I~ ~
. ... __ __ __ -----1 i _t:Jf"€ __t:.t!!!.--!1 q _ __ ..~.._ ~~~Y"t-. _ tlr.H~ -'r~'~.~ ~s
,
..-. -- -..----.-. - ._.. ...--~' ._----_.-~,---,~----_._-_...- --- _.. ._--_.----,---- ------..---
.___HU.. i.~_ r#~~~!!6:___~t~~~~ ~, ~-..~-~~.-!.-._-,
. .....n.._.":. : i: ..~,-'il, _.J}~- ...4.1/'/#'1 _ . rq,~~ - .-tf!'~ ~4-~
_ .._.u..... ..',I..p;,~~ _.~7_mft..~~L ~_"";../.-l' i~A/'o/-~'
.' ______.___... ',i .EI""-~_/l~--.~~.~~~fV.u -.
__ _____._~ II El~,,~_~~~~~...-A!tI~ir. 6..:J F~" p.~'~ ~F .t!flteH. ~/#~~
I
......_........_..._ ,! _~_..fl~_"'-/~_n~# ~4)
II
-1 -
rE_Jt.i'f1~n.lfp.tJP( R #~ ,,&~ ~~.
I
! 6~_._~E..At~_~u.( ""',,_/~ .~ /~ ~ ~dr .
~ I
~ 'I
il '
- I
I
. I ,
, ,
I
i
i i
----~
-~_.- !)
I ~
--~--
:
"
__ __l
I
-
-----
I I
--,-.-.
,
! ,
A~ _~de'Kf/~' HNh N~ _ /Z~D~ 7f!1 ~-L-____~u
E/ehuJ __~J~ ~~ 76 ;&;~
__~AI.l' p g /:VJ~u? @ ~ 1'D~ ~F
.2 E7V~_1PVL4-P&.
-_._~
I
i
I
I -
II
I
---~~---
I
-----
I
-~--11
- _____ J I f---'
!
II
.----------------------
--
"_'_ -- --- f---
.- ----- f---
!
----- --
~------_._.-..~--------
_,..__..m._ _______
I
-------1 ~.
I
-------------_._--~--~.__._~---_...__._--~----_._-----
c--------- --- -------,------------
l--------m~------'
i
I
-..- ,--_._---~---~-~------_._--_._,._"----_..-.._-----"'.- ..
.
1!r~~
A~Lo~~
~..~.~~~.'"
Sr:: -~ ~S
.~~~.
~I?~ ~~~
~1Ijf~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
Mr. Roland Rogers
P.O. Box 676
Crystal Beach, FL 34681
January 28, 2003
~ ~ ~4... w\.....-.rOr .,...t.~,f\~,~
~~~ 3) td u+
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-11003 - 620 Bayway Boulevard
Dear Mr. Rogers:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a
reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the
side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and from 10 feet to 1.8
feet (to pool deck), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement
and building) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck),
as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots. The Community Development Board (CDB)
APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
3. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording
warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
BRIAN J, AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR.COMMISSIONER HoYr HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILl. JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
..
January 28,2003
Rogers - Page Two
4. That covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an
administrative level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
5. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and
boatyards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building
permits;
6. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
7. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 ofthe Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks; and
8. That all storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (January 21,2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall
be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of
time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy ofthis letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect
of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case
expires on February 4,2003.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.c1earwater-fl.com.
V/l tru~y. yours,
~~~
Cynthia Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
Cc: Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
Bill Woods
I\MS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlInactive or Finished ApplicationslBayway 620 The Moorings 1- ApprovedlBayway 620
Development Order,doc