06/20/2006
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
June 20, 2006
Present: David Gildersleeve Chair
Nicholas C. Fritsch Vice-Chair
Kathy Milam Board Member
J. B. Johnson Board Member
Thomas Coates Board Member
Dana K. Tallman Board Member – arrived 1:02 p.m.
Jordan Behar Board Member
Daniel Dennehy Alternate Board Member
Also Present: Gina Grimes Attorney for the Board
Leslie Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney
Michael L. Delk Planning Director
Neil C. Thompson Planning Manager
Patricia O. Sullivan Board Reporter
The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Invocation
and Pledge of Allegiance.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: May 16, 2006
Member Fritsch moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of May 16, 2006,
as amended: motion on page 15 to read “ . . .that it meet a complementary style to
motioncarried
Mediterranean . . .“ The was duly seconded and unanimously. Alternate Board
Member Daniel Dennehy did not vote.
D. REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCE: (Items 1 – 3)
Community Development 2006-06-20 1
1. Case: FLD2005-09093 – 279 Windward Passage Level Two Application
(Request for Continuance to July 18, 2006)
Owner/Applicant: Harbour Estates, LLC.
Representative: Bill Woods/Terri Skapik, Woods Consulting, Inc. (1714 County Road 1,
Suite 22, Dunedin, FL 34698; phone: 727-786-5747; fax: 727-786-7479; email:
billwoods@woodsconsulting.org).
Location: 1.45 acres located on the south side of Windward Passage, approximately 300
feet west of Island Way.
Atlas Page: 267B.
Zoning District: Commercial (C) District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a 1,818 square-foot multi-use dock for eight
boat slips in the Commercial District with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 22.4 feet to
1.5 feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601.
Proposed Use: Multi-use dock for eight boat slips.
Neighborhood Associations: Island Estates Civic Association (Frank Dame, 140 Island Way
#239, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-442-2237); Islander Condo Inc. (Rex Clark, President,
113 Island Way, Apt. 245, Clearwater, FL 33767); Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Sondra
Kerr, President, P.O. Box 8204, Clearwater, FL 33758).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III.
motion
Member Coates moved to continue Item D1 to July 18, 2006. The was duly
carried
seconded and unanimously. Alternate Board Member Dennehy did not vote.
2. Case: FLD2006-02009 – 490 Mandalay Avenue Level Two Application
(Request for Continuance to August 15, 2006)
Owner/Applicant: Mary G Realty, Inc.
Representative: Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA (701 South Enterprise Road East, Suite 404,
Safety Harbor, FL 34695; phone: 727-793-9888; fax: 727-793-9855; email:
keith@keithzayac.com).
Location: 0.4 acre located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont
Street.
Atlas Page: 267A.
Zoning District: Tourist (T) District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District
with a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to
trash staging area) and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint
of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2-803.B.
Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (12 condominiums).
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Beach Association (Jay Keyes, 100 Devon Drive,
Clearwater, FL 33767: phone: 727-443-2168; email: papamurphy@aol.com); Clearwater
Neighborhoods Coalition (Sondra Kerr, President, P.O. Box 8204, Clearwater, FL 33758).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III.
In response to a question, representative Gerald Figurski, said the applicant had
requested the continuance to meet with staff and solve their concerns regarding the project’s
design and aesthetics, prior to the item’s consideration by the Community Development Board.
motion
Member Johnson moved to continue Item D2 to August 15, 2006. The was duly
carried
seconded and unanimously. Alternate Board Member Dennehy did not vote.
Community Development 2006-06-20 2
3. Level Two Application
Case: FLD2005-11114 – 1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street
Owner/Applicant: Douglas Birch, LBR Holdings, III, LLC. (1401 Court Street, Clearwater,
FL 33756; phone: 727-446-3058; fax: 727-441-1499).
Location: 0.681 acre located on the east side of South Hillcrest Avenue, between Court
and Rogers streets.
Atlas Pages: 297A.
Zoning District: Office (O) District; and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District.
Request: Flexible Development Application to reduce the south (rear) setback from 20 feet to 10
feet within the Office (O) District, pursuant to Section 2-1003.F of the Community Development
Code; and to allow non-residential off-street parking within the Low Medium Density Residential
(LMDR) District with deviations to the south (front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet and west
(front) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet; and to allow the encroachment of a drive aisle within the
required sight visibility triangles along South Hillcrest Avenue as a Residential Infill Project
pursuant to Sections 2-204.C and E of the Community Development Code; with a reduction to
the east (side) perimeter landscape buffer from 12 feet to 10 feet as part of a Comprehensive
Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3-1202.G.
Proposed Use: Office and Non-Residential Off-Street Parking.
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Sondra Kerr, President, P.O.
Box 8204, Clearwater, FL 33758).
Presenter: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III.
In his June 19, 2006 e-mail to Senior Planner Robert Tefft, applicant Douglas Birch
requested that this item be continued and referenced July’s meeting date. Based on neighbor
objections, the item had been removed from the Consent Agenda. Mr. Birch was not present.
motion
Member Coates moved to continue Item D3 to July 18, 2006. The was duly
seconded.
Two people expressed concern that the item could be continued again, said they had
gone through significant effort to be present today, and requested if the item is continued, that it
be continued until August.
It was recommended that the continuance include a condition requiring the applicant to
contact neighbor, Ralph Spencer, regarding his concerns. Discussion ensued with comments
that continuing the item beyond the requested date could be onerous to the applicant and that
the applicant did have the opportunity to be represented today.
Upon the vote being taken, Members Coates, Tallman, and Behar voted “Aye”; Members
failed
Fritsch, Milam, Johnson, and Chair Gildersleeve voted “Nay.” Motion . Alternate Board
Member Dennehy did not vote.
Member Fritsch moved to continue Item D3 to August 15, 2006, with a condition that the
motion
applicant meet and speak with neighbors to discuss their issues of concern. The was
carried
duly seconded and unanimously. Alternate Board Member Dennehy did not vote.
Community Development 2006-06-20 3
E. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the applicant, staff,
neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of the
meeting. (Items 1 – 3)
1. Case: ANX2006-03011 – 1416 Regal Road Level Three Application
Owner: Rose Quattrocchi
Location: A 0.187-acre parcel of land located on the north side of Regal Road
approximately 320 feet east of Sunny Park Drive and 550 feet west of Braund Street.
Atlas Page: 315A.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 0.187-acres of property to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Future Land Use Plan amendment from Residential Low (RL) Category (County) to
Residential Low (RL) Category (City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from R-3, Single-Family Residential District (County) to Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) District (City of Clearwater).
Existing Use: Single-family detached dwelling.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Sondra Kerr, President, P.O.
Box 8204, Clearwater, FL 33758).
Presenter: Cky Ready, Planner II.
This annexation involves a 0.187-acre property consisting of one parcel, located on the
north side of Regal Road, approximately 320 feet east of Sunny Park Drive. The property is
contiguous with existing City boundaries to the south; therefore, the proposed annexation is
consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. The applicant is requesting
this annexation in order to receive solid waste service from the City. It is proposed that the
property be assigned a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Low (RL) and a zoning
category of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). There are no current code enforcement
violations or any code enforcement history on this site.
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including solid
waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the service
level. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City’s Comprehensive Plan and is
consistent with Pinellas County Ordinance 00-63 regarding voluntary annexation.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the approval of: 1)
The annexation of 0.187 acre to the City of Clearwater; 2) The Residential Low (RL) Future
Land Use Plan classification; and 3) The Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning
classification pursuant to the City’s Community Development Code.
See page 6 for motion to recommend approval.
Community Development 2006-06-20 4
2. Case: ANX2006-02006 – 1614 Stevensons/Stevenson’s Drive Level Three Application
Owner: Betty Vinson
Location: A 0.20-acre parcel of land located on the west side of Stevenson’s Drive
approximately 250 feet north of Stockton Drive.
Atlas Page: 269B.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 0.20 acre of property to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Future Land Use Plan amendment from Residential Low (RL) and Preservation (P)
Category (County) to Residential Low (RL) and Preservation (P) Category (City of
Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from R-3, Single-Family Residential District (County) to Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) and Preservation (P) District (City of Clearwater).
Existing Use: Single-family detached dwelling.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Sondra Kerr, President, P.O.
Box 8204, Clearwater, FL 33758).
Presenter: Cky Ready, Planner II.
This annexation involves a 0.20-acre property consisting of one parcel, located on the
west side of Stevenson’s Drive, approximately 250 feet north of Stockton Drive. The property is
contiguous with existing City boundaries to the north; therefore, the proposed annexation is
consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. The applicant is requesting
this annexation in order to receive sanitary sewer and solid waste service from the City. It is
proposed that the property be assigned Future Land Use Plan designations of Residential Low
(RL) and Preservation (P) and zoning categories of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
and Preservation (P). There are no current code enforcement violations or any code
enforcement history on this site.
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including
sanitary sewer, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse
effect on the service level. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with Pinellas County Ordinance 00-63 regarding
voluntary annexation.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of: 1) The
Residential Low (RL) and Preservation (P) Future Land Use Plan classifications, and 2) The
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) and Preservation (P) zoning classifications pursuant
to the City’s Community Development Code.
See page 6 for motion to recommend approval.
Community Development 2006-06-20 5
3. Case: ANX2006-02004– 1574 Crown Street Level Three Application
Owner: Terry Sherman (Telephone 727-215-5970).
Location: A 0.163-acre parcel of land located on the north side of Crown Street
approximately 400 feet from the intersection of Crown Street and Ridge Avenue.
Atlas Page: 264A.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 0.163-acre of property to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Future Land Use Plan amendment from Residential Low (RL) Category (County) to
Residential Low (RL) Category (City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from R-3, Single-Family Residential District (County) to Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) District (City of Clearwater).
Existing Use: Single-family detached dwelling.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Sondra Kerr, President, P.O.
Box 8204, Clearwater, FL 33758).
Presenter: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III.
The subject property is located on the north side of Crown Street, approximately 400 feet
from the intersection of Crown Street and Ridge Avenue. The property is located within an
enclave and is contiguous to existing City boundaries; therefore, the proposed annexation is
consistent with Pinellas County requirements with regard to voluntary annexation. It is
proposed that the abutting right-of-way not currently within the City limits, also be annexed. The
applicant is requesting this annexation in order to receive sanitary sewer and solid waste
service from the City. The subject site is approximately 0.163 acre in area and is occupied by a
single family detached dwelling. It is proposed that the property be assigned a Future Land Use
Plan designation of Residential Low (RL) and a zoning category of Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR). There are no current code enforcement violations or any code
enforcement history on this site.
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including
sanitary sewer, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse
effect on the service level. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with Pinellas County Ordinance 00-63 regarding
voluntary annexation.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of: The
annexation of 0.163 acre and the abutting Crown Street right-of-way to the City of Clearwater; 2)
The Residential Low (RL) Future Land Use Plan classification; and 3) The Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) zoning classification pursuant to the City’s Community Development Code.
Member Fritsch moved to recommend approval of Item D1, Case: ANX2006-03011 for
1416 Regal Road based on Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as listed, and the Staff
report; Item D2, Case: ANX2006-02006 for 1614 Stevensons/Stevenson’s Drive based on
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as listed, and the Staff report,; and Item D3, Case:
ANX2006-02004 for 1574 Crown Street based on Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as
motion carried
listed, and the Staff report,. The was duly seconded and unanimously.
Alternate Board Member Dennehy did not vote.
F. LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS: (Item 1)
Community Development 2006-06-20 6
1. Case: FLD2006-03014 – 913 – 915 Jeffords Street Level Two Application
Owner/Applicant: Richard A. Tellone and Angelia Tellone.
th
Representative: Richard A. Tellone (346 80 Avenue NE, St. Petersburg, FL 33702;
phone: 727-579-7992; email: rtellon1@tampabay.rr.com).
Location: 0.172 acre located on the south side of Jeffords Street, approximately 750 feet
east of South Myrtle Avenue and 150 feet west of Ewing Avenue.
Atlas Page: 306A.
Zoning District: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District.
Request: Flexible Development approval for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for
density to allow the continuation of two existing detached dwellings (where only one dwelling
unit is permitted today) in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions
of Section 6-109.C.
Proposed Use: Continuation of two existing detached dwellings.
Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Sondra Kerr, President, P.O.
Box 8204, Clearwater, FL 33758).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III.
Member Johnson moved to accept Wayne Wells as an expert witness in the fields of
motion
zoning, site plan analysis, code administration, and planning in general. The was duly
carried
seconded and unanimously
Senior Planner Wayne Wells reviewed the request. The 0.172-acre site is located on
the south side of Jeffords Street, approximately 750 feet east of South Myrtle Avenue and 150
feet west of Ewing Avenue. The site currently is developed with two detached dwellings, each
constructed in 1925, according to Pinellas County Property Appraiser information. When
purchased by the current property owner, this overall site was split into two smaller lots 28 feet
wide with each smaller lot developed with a residential building with two dwellings in each
building. By letter dated May 12, 2004, the owner was advised that the parcel had been illegally
split into the two smaller lots and one additional dwelling per building had been added without
any permits and in violation of density regulations. The current property owner has removed
one dwelling from each building, returning the use to detached dwellings as originally
developed. The owner also has executed and recorded a Unity of Title document to tie the two
small lots together for development purposes.
The majority of the surrounding area is developed with detached dwellings. The
property to the north, at 910 Jeffords Street, is developed with two attached dwellings. Other
properties within one block of the subject property are developed with attached dwellings. The
property directly to the south is developed with a nonconforming office use. The area to the
west along South Myrtle Avenue is nonresidential in character, while the area to the east along
South Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue is developed with offices and attached dwelling complexes.
The proposal is for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the
continuation of the two existing detached dwellings. Based on the overall lot area and the
maximum density of 7.5 dwelling units per acre under the Residential Urban land use category,
the overall property is only permitted one dwelling unit. When the current property owners
bought the property, they thought they had a total of two dwelling units on each small lot. After
returning the property to the one dwelling unit per building, the owners have had difficulty in
selling the property due to the nonconforming density. Under the provisions of Section 6-103.E,
if either or both of the residential buildings were to be destroyed or damaged to 50% or more of
Community Development 2006-06-20 7
their assessed building value (according to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser), then only
one dwelling unit may be reconstructed on this overall parcel. It is the applicant’s desire to have
the nonconforming density terminated, making the two detached dwellings conforming to
density, in order to further market the property. While detached dwellings dominate the
surrounding area, there are attached dwellings on parcels within one block of the property under
the same zoning and land use category as the subject property that are similarly nonconforming
to density.
The property to the north at 910 Jeffords Street has two attached dwelling units
(nonconforming to density where only one dwelling unit is permitted). The property at 831
Grand Central Avenue has two attached dwelling units, also nonconforming to density (only one
dwelling unit permitted). The property at 1105 South Prospect Avenue has two attached
dwelling units, also nonconforming to density (only one dwelling unit permitted). Different to
these other nonconforming density properties, the subject property is developed with detached
dwellings, which is consistent with the dominant character of the surrounding area. In the event
this application is approved, such approval should include a condition that if one or both of the
detached dwellings are destroyed or damaged in the future to 50% or more of their assessed
building value (according to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser), reconstruction of the site
with two detached dwellings should be required (such as a main dwelling in the front with a
detached dwelling over a garage in the rear). Additionally, since the lot was split into two illegal
smaller lots prior to the present property owner, and although the property owner has recorded
a Unity of Title document, these smaller lots should be requested by the property owner to be
recombined under one parcel number by the Property Appraiser’s office.
Under the Termination of the Status of Nonconformity provisions, there are four required
improvements: 1) Installation of perimeter buffers. In this case there are no perimeter buffers
required for detached dwellings; 2) Improvement of off-street parking lots to landscaping
standards. Two of the existing parking spaces and the drive to the rear are presently shell.
Two parking spaces are within the garage at the rear of the property. The applicant is
proposing to replace the existing shell exterior parking with paved parking (pavers). Two
parking spaces per dwelling unit will continue to be provided (both paved). Based on a review
of the existing improvements, it was determined to retain the existing shell drive from the front of
the property to the rear parking areas (within the garage and exterior parking spaces). The
applicant proposes to remove the existing shell parking areas in front of the dwellings and
replace these areas with landscaping including palms, shrubs and ground covers. The
landscaping improvements proposed in front of the dwellings will improve the aesthetics of
these dwellings from the street; however, the palms must be 10-foot clear trunk (rather than 2.5-
inch caliper). Curbing acceptable to the Planning Department should also protect these new
front landscaped areas. There are no landscape improvements required for the exterior parking
area, as the vehicular use area is less than 4,000 square-feet in size; 3) Removal of
nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structures. There are no
nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or accessory structures; and 4) Use of Comprehensive
Sign Program and Comprehensive Landscape Programs to satisfy requirements. These
programs are unnecessary for this proposal.
All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General
Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) have been met. There is a current enforcement issue
associated with this site regarding the owner’s need for an occupational license for rental units
(BIZ2005-01339).
Community Development 2006-06-20 8
Findings of Fact: 1) The overall subject property is 0.172 acre, which permits only one
dwelling unit under the Residential Urban land use category; 2) The current use of the overall
subject property is presently developed with two detached dwellings (which is nonconforming to
the current density maximum); 3) The proposal is for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity
for density to declare the existing density conforming so as to allow future reconstruction of the
dwellings in the event of damage or destruction to 50% or more of the building’s assessed value
(individually or both) by the Property Appraiser’s office; 4) Detached dwellings dominate the
surrounding area; 5) Attached dwellings exist within one block of this overall property with
similar nonconforming density; 6) The existing detached dwellings are consistent and
compatible with the surrounding area; 7) The proposal meets the required improvements of
Section 6-109.C for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity; and 8) While there is an active
code enforcement case for the property, such related to the need for an occupational license for
rentals.
Conclusions of Law: 1) Staff concludes that the criteria of Section 6-109.C for the
Termination of Status of Nonconformity are met; 2) Staff further concludes that the proposal is in
compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of
the Code; and 3) Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, staff recommends
approval of this application.
The DRC reviewed the application and supporting materials on May 4, 2006. The
Planning Department recommends approval for the Flexible Development approval for the
Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of two existing
detached dwellings (where only one dwelling unit is permitted today) in the Medium Density
Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 6-109.C, for the site at 913 – 915
Jeffords Street with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal
complies with the criteria of Section 6-109.C for the Termination of Status of a Nonconformity; 2)
The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3) The existing development is consistent and
compatible with the surrounding area. AND Conditions of Approval: 1) That, should one or both
of the detached dwellings be destroyed or damaged in the future to 50% or more of their
assessed building value (according to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser), reconstruction of
the site must be with two detached dwellings; 2) That within 30 days the property owner request
the Property Appraiser’s office recombine the two smaller lots to one parcel and parcel number
as original, with confirmation of such recombination provided to the Planning Department; and
3) That the property owners submit plans for permitting within 60 days to install the paver
parking spaces and landscaping as proposed under this application. Curbing of the front
landscaped areas acceptable to the Planning Department and palms with a 10-foot clear trunk
must be shown on the plans.
Concerns were expressed that vehicles are parked in the front yard, that only one
driveway serves both structures, and that approval would sanction the current use of two
dwellings on one lot in a residential neighborhood. Mr. Wells said the applicant has agreed to
remove parking from the front yard and install landscaping. Staff supports maintaining the shell
driveway as a permeable surface. Concern was expressed that the Code intends for
nonconforming properties to be brought into compliance.
Community Development 2006-06-20 9
.
.
.
Richard Tellone, owner, reviewed difficulties he had encountered since purchasing the
property. He said after the conclusion of costly litigation, he worked with the City for 18 months
to resolve issues and spent significant money improving the property to meet Code standards,
while the property did not generate any income. He said based on its non-conformity status, he
has been unable to market the property or obtain financing to complete improvements. He said
comparable properties are in the neighborhood. He said he had removed derelict vehicles and
debris. He planned to enhance the property with extensive landscaping in the front and pavers
in the rear. In response to a question, Mr. Tellone said if the structures were destroyed, he
preferred to replace them with a similar number of units. He did not intend to demolish or
replace the structures at this time.
Discussion ensued with comments that the proposal is consistent with and
complementary to the neighborhood. It was felt that two units per lot is not out of character with
the neighborhood. Support was expressed for proposed improvements.
Member Coates moved to approve Item F1, Case: FLD2006-03014 for 913 - 915
Jeffords Street based on Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as listed, the Staff report, and
including Bases for Approval and Conditions of Approval as listed. The motion was duly
seconded. Members Fritsch, Milam, Coates, Tallman, and Behar and Chair Gildersleeve voted
"Aye"; Member Johnson voted "Nay." Motion carried. Alternate Board Member Dennehy did
not vote.
Director Comments
Planning Director Michael Delk reported that staff is working with the downtown Marriott
hotel project applicant. Appropriate design changes are being made. It was requested that staff
provide the board with copies of final renderings, when they are available.
G. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 1 :43 p.m.
Community Development 2006-06-20
10
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: June 20, 2006
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
Continued Item 1
1. cise: FLD2005-09093 - 279 Windward Passage
~Yes no
Level Two Application
Level Two Applications Items 1-3
1. Case FLD2006-03014 - 913 - 915 Jeffords Street
Yes no
Case FLD2005-11114 -1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street
2. Yes no
3. C se: FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Avenue
Yes no
Level Three Applications Items 1-3
1. Case: ANX2006-0Jl1-1416 Regal Road
Yes no
2. Case: ANX2006-02J04- 1574 Crown Street
Yes g no
3. Case: ANX2006-02~06 -1614 Stevensons / Stevenson's Drive
Yes \J no
Signafu~~
--.
Date:
tv ").0. O( 1
S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: June 20, 2006
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
Continued Item 1
1.
C~ FLD2005-09093 - 279 Windward Passage
~-~es no
Level Two Application
Level Two Applications Items 1-3
1. Case: ~D2006-03014 - 913 - 915 Jeffords Street
I~Yes no
Case: FLD2005-11114 -1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street
2. ..............Yes no
3. Ca~ FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Avenue
./' Yes no
Level Three Applications Items 1-3
1. Case: ANX2006-03011 - 1416 Regal Road
~s no
2. Case: ANX2006-02004- 1574 Crown Street
/' Yes no
,
3. Case: ANX2006-02006 -1614 Steven sons I Stevenson's Drive
-LYes no
Signature:
~~ate:
hIZo/()~
, ,
S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: June 20, 2006
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
Continued Item 1
1. C~e: FLD2005-09093 - 279 Windward Passage
~Yes no
Level Two Application
Level Two Applications Items 1-3
1. Case: YLD2006-03014 - 913 - 915 Jeffords Street
V Yes no
Case: FLD2005-11114 -1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street
2. ~ Yes no
3. Case: FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Avenue
, A es no
--
Level Three Applications Items 1-3
1. Case: ANX2006-03011-1416 Regal Road
~Yes no
2. ~ ANX2006-02004-1574 Crown Street
Yes no
3. ~ ANX2006-02006 - 1614 Stevensons I Stevenson's Drive
Yes no
Signature:~ Date: C ';6(,
S:\Planning Departrnent\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: June 20, 2006
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
Continued Item 1
1. Ca~ FLD2005-09093 - 279 Windward Passage
~Yes no
Level Two Application
Level Two Applications Items 1-3
1. CasevFLD2006-03014 - 913 - 915 Jeffords Street
~ Yes no
Case:}'LD2005-11114 -1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street
2. ~ Yes no
3. Cas~FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Avenue
/Y;s no
Level Three Applications Items 1-3
1. Case: ANX2006-0301~ 1416 Regal Road
Yes / no
2. Case: ANX2006-020oL.. 1574 Crown Street
Yes V. no
3. Case: ANX2006-02006 - 1614 Stevensons I Stevenson's Drive
/00
Yes
Signature:
Date: (p / /1 I O~
. ,
S:\Pla ng Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: June 20, 2006
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
Continued Item 1
1.
Case: FLD2005-09093 - 279 Windward Passage
V Yes no
Level Two Application
Lev~1 T 0 Applications Items 1-3
1. Case. FLD2006-03014 - 913 - 915 Jeffords Street
Yes no
Case: FLD2005-11114 -1401 Court Street and 1400 Rogers Street
2. / Yes no
3. C~: FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Avenue
. Yes no
Level Three Applications Items 1-3
1. Case: ANX2006-03011 - 1416 Regal Road
Yes / no
2. Case: ANX2006-0~4- 1574 Crown Street
Yes no
3. Case: ANX2001HlJ6 - 1614 Stevensons I Stevenson's Drive
Yes no
Signatnre:4t~ ~ Date: ~. ::lD- 06
S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check Iist.doc