05/15/2006
"C. ~[D' r.~<A
~~\." ':~~~
'f'. "-:"::k-.' '?
Ci. -~'VJM:<(
~... .'Q
--- ... .. ,=---
'rr':'" : .. . . '~
~.i:::':<:'; .,~ZSS
YY4iE~,
WORK SESSION AGENDA
Clearwater City Council Work Session
Monday, May 15, 2006 - 1 :30 p.m.
Presentations
1. Service Awards
Economic Development and Housing
1. Approve the Interlocal Agreement between Pinellas County and the Cities of
Clearwater, St. Petersburg and Largo, to mutually hire a consultant to conduct a
Nexus Study for Affordable Housing needs of the County and Cities, with the City
paying for 12% of the study's cost and authorize the appropriate officials to
execute same. (consent)
Finance
1. Authorize settlement of all workers' compensation claims of Claimant, Thomas
Stubblefield, in their entirety to include medical, indemnity and attorney fees for
the sum of $45,000 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same.
( consent)
Parks and Recreation
1. Approve a Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement with the Florida Department
of Transportation, District Seven, so that aesthetic improvements can be made to
a portion of SR 60 (the east entrance to the Memorial Causeway Bridge and 770
feet west of the Memorial Causeway Bridge) and adopt Resolution 06-29
authorizing execution of said Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement.
2. Ratify and confirm the City Manager's approval of the First Amendment to Station
WSJT 94.1 Sponsorship Agreement to co-promote the Smooth Jazz Fest
Concert on April 21, 2006 and April 22, 2006, located in Coachman Park.
( consent)
Engineering
1. Approve the applicant's request to vacate the north 268.65 feet of the 10-foot
drainage and utility easement lying along the east property line of Metes and
Bounds Parcel Number 32-05, located in Section 19-29-16, (a.k.a. 501-529
South Belcher Road), subject to conditions, and pass Ordinance 7615-06 on first
reading, (VAC2006-05 Ellis and Company, Inc.).
Work Session 2006-05-15
1
2. Approve the applicant's request to vacate the 30-foot utility easement retained
over the vacated portion of State Street that lies between Lots 9 and 20 of E.A.
Marshalls Subdivision, (a.k.a. 1390 Sunset Point Road), and pass Ordinance
7651-06 on first reading, (VAC2006-08 Pathways Community Church).
3. Approve a work order to McKim & Creed of Clearwater FI. (EOR), in the amount
of $203,400 for the Well 78 and Well 23 Improvement Project, project 05-0078-
UT, and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. (consent)
4. Approve the final plat for "HAROLD COURT TOWN HOMES PHASE II" located at
607 Indiana Avenue, south of Turner Avenue. (consent)
5. Approve the final plat for "THE TOWNHOMES OF ANTIGUA BAY" located at
808 Osceola Ave, at the intersection of Osceola Avenue and Nicholson Street.
( consent)
6. Approve the final plat for "HIGHLAND GLEN" located at 2045 Highland Avenue,
which is approximately % of a mile north of Sunset Point Road. (consent)
7. Provide guidance to staff on the configuration of the Skycrest neighborhood
traffic calm ing project.
8. Approve the Grant Agreement with the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) which provides reimbursement of project costs up to $481,100
and award a construction contract to Rowland, Inc. of Pinellas Park, Florida, for
the Del Oro Groves Reclaimed Water System Installation and Water Main
Replacement (04-0022-UT) in the amount of $3,667,030.68, which is the lowest
responsible bid received in accordance with plans and specifications.
Planning
1. Approve the Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the
County Residential Low (RL) Category to the City Residential Low (RL) Category
and Zoning Atlas Amendment from the County R-3, Single-Family Residential
District to the City Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for 1212
Claire Drive (Lot 8, Block A, Stevenson's Heights Subdivision in Section 10-29-
15); and Pass Ordinance 7618-06, 7619-06 & 7620-06 on first reading.
2. Approve the Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the
County Residential Urban (RU) Category to the City Residential Urban (RU)
Category and Zoning Atlas Amendment from the County R-4, Single-Family
Residential District to the City Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
for 1969 N. Betty Lane (Lot 1, Lange's Replat of Brown's Subdivision in Section
3-29-15); and Pass Ordinance 7621-06, 7622-06 & 7623-06 on first reading.
3. Approve the Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the
County Residential Low (RL) Category to the City Residential Low (RL) Category
Work Session 2006-05-15
2
and Zoning Atlas Amendment from the County R-3, Single-Family Residential
District to the City Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for 1824
Marilyn Drive (Lot 13, Block G, Carlton Terrace First Addition Subdivision in
Section 5-29-16); and Pass Ordinance 7624-06, 7625-06 & 7626-06 on first
reading.
City Attorney
1. Adopt Ordinance 7607-06 on second reading, annexing certain real property
whose post office address is 3076 Cherry Lane into the corporate limits of the
city and redefining the boundary lines of the city to include said addition.
2. Adopt Ordinance 7608-06 on second reading, amending the future land use plan
element of the Comprehensive Plan of the city to designate the land use for
certain real property whose post office address is 3076 Cherry Lane, upon
annexation into the City of Clearwater, as Residential Urban (RU).
3. Adopt Ordinance 7609-06 on second reading, amending the zoning atlas of the
city by zoning certain real property whose post office address is 3076 Cherry
Lane, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR).
4. Adopt Ordinance 7616-06 on second reading, establishing the Mobile Home
Transition Program; Amending the Community Development Code; providing a
Level Three procedure for determination that adequate mobile home parks or
other suitable facilities exist for the relocation of mobile home owners; providing
for qualifying governmental action; providing for applicant responsibilities;
providing for council action; providing for conditional final decision; providing
standards for review; amending the Code of Ordinances to provide for
supplemental rental assistance payment fund; providing for an alternative
mitigation option; providing for rental assistance payments to eligible individuals.
5. Adopt Resolution 06-30, amending Development Agreement between City of
Clearwater and Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc.
Other City Attorney Items
City Manager Verbal Reports
1. Very Important Pets Update.
Council Discussion Items
1. Update on the healthy communities schedule.
2. Proposed Agenda for the PSTA Board Visit.
Work Session 2006-05-15
3
Other Council Action
Adjourn
Presentation(s) for Council Meeting
1. Proclamation - June as National Homeownership Month
2. Proclamation - Safe Boating Week - May 20 - 26, 2006
3. Proclamation - Public Works Week - May 21 - 26, 2006
4. Presentation - Award to the recipients of Youth Sportsmanship Award
Work Session 2006-05-15
4
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,064
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Approve the Interlocal Agreement between Pinellas County and the Cities of Clearwater, St.
Petersburg and Largo, to mutually hire a consultant to conduct a Nexus Study for Affordable
Housing needs of the County and Cities, with the City paying for 12% of the study's cost and
authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
Summary:
The City, along with Pinellas County and the Cities of St. Petersburg and Largo have agreed to
jointly fund the cost of conducting a nexus study of affordable housing needs within our County.
Pinellas County is taking the lead on this study.
The objectives of the study are to:
- Provide an unbiased analysis of the projected need for new units of affordable housing (rental
and ownership), under varying levels of household income and purchase price/rent. The level of
detail to be provided under the study must be adequate to demonstrate the need for creating
new units of affordable housing by distinguishing between the discrete categories of (i) new
affordable units needed due to the future commercial/office/industrial development; (ii) new
affordable housing units needed due to average influx migration patterns and/or normal growth
with the populations, taking into account the loss of affordable housing through mobile home
park redevelopment and conversion of apartment units to condominiums; and (iii) new
affordable units needed as a result of the continued construction of market rate and luxury
housing.
- Provide the structure for a legally defensible basis/nexus for the adoption of an inclusionary
housing ordinance by: demonstrating the link, if any between the development and
redevelopment of any properties in the County for the full range of residential, commercial,
industrial and institutional uses allowed under the Pinellas County Countywide Plan and the
demand for affordable housing; demonstrating the effect of a lack of affordable housing on the
general welfare of the public; and providing a basis methodology for computation of fees to be
paid in-lieu of affordable housing construction under an inclusionary housing ordinance.
- Provide the structure for a legally defensible basis/nexus for the adoption of a commercial
linkage fee ordinance by demonstrating the link, if any, between future
commercial/office/industrial development and an increasing need for new units of affordable
housing.
- Provide analysis and the structure for a legally defensible basis/nexus for the adoption of an
ordinance or a commercial linkage fee, or some hybrid thereof, as it relates specifically to
mixed-use projects containing both residential and commercial components.
The RFP was issued on April 12, 2006. Proposals are due to the County from respondents by
May 2, 2006. The City's share of the cost will be 12%. Pinellas County estimates that the cost
of the study will be around $50,000. The City will also have two seats on the Committee that
will be reviewing and selecting the consultant.
Oriqinatinq: Economic Development and Housing
Section Consent Agenda
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
Cateqory: Agreements/Contracts - with cost
Public Hearinq: No
Financial Information:
~ Purchase
Sid Required? No
Sid Exceptions:
Other Government Sid
Other Contract?
Pinellas County Purchasing is handing the bidding for this study
In Current Year Sudget?
No
Sudqet Adiustment:
No
Current Year Cost:
$6,000.00
For Fiscal Year:
10/01/2006 to 09/30/2006
Total Cost:
$6,000.00
Not to Exceed:
$6,000.00
Appropriation Code(s)
0181-99421-582000-554-00
Review Approval
Howie Carroll
Tina Wilson
Sill Horne
Geraldine Camoos
Amount
Comments
14:53:46
09:35:35
11:18:10
11:43:05
04-17-2006
05-04-2006
05-12-2006
04-25-2006
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Cvndie Goudeau
05-09-2006 15:44:28
Sue Diana
05-12-2006 11:26:00
Bryan Ruff
04-27-2006 09:31:20
Rod Irwin
05-09-2006 15:37: 16
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this _ day of
, 2006, by and between PINELLAS COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of
Florida, the CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, the CITY OF LARGO, and the CITY OF
CLEARWATER, collectively referred to as "the Parties."
Witnesseth:
WHEREAS, this Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 163.01, Florida Statutes,
also known as the "Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1969"; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of PINELLAS COUNTY ("BCC")
established the Community Housing Workgroup ("Workgroup") to make findings about the need
for affordable housing in PINELLAS COUNTY; and
WHEREAS, the Workgroup identified three specific strategies for alleviating the
affordable housing shortage: inc1usionary zoning; a Housing Trust Fund; and development
regulations; and
WHEREAS, a commercial linkage fee was identified as a potential source of
capitalization for a Housing Trust Fund; and
WHEREAS, on October 18,2005, the Workgroup findings were presented to the BCC,
and by Resolution 05-238, the BCC recognized an affordable housing shortage and established
the Pinellas County Community Housing Program; and
WHEREAS, the Parties hereto now desire to mutually hire a consultant to conduct a
nexus study for affordable housing; and
1
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual terms, conditions, promIses, covenants and
payments set forth, the parties agree as follows:
1. PINELLAS COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES:
1.1 PINELLAS COUNTY shall competitively solicit for the consulting contract
pursuant to the Pinellas County Purchasing Code and any relevant federal
regulations covering procurement for services in order to obtain a nexus study for
affordable housing; and
1.2 PINELLAS COUNTY shall award the contract, based upon the reVIew and
recommendation of a group composed of delegates of the parties hereto; and
1.3 PINELLAS COUNTY shall coordinate the signing of the contract between the
Parties and the consulting contractor selected to do the analysis; and
1.4 PINELLAS COUNTY shall be responsible for the administration of the
consulting contract; and
1.5 PINELLAS COUNTY shall coordinate billing under the consulting contract by
receiving invoices from the selected contractor and directing each party to remit
their portion of an invoice directly to the contractor. At no time will PINELLAS
COUNTY advance funds on behalf of another party to cover contract costs; and
1.6 PINELLAS COUNTY shall retain any public records created as a result of this
Agreement and the consulting contract in accord with the Florida Public Records
Act, Chapter 119, Florida Statues.
2. MUTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES:
2
2.1 Each party shall participate III the selection of a contractor consultant by
designating a delegate to sit on the selection committee, which will then make a
recommendation to the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners; and
2.2 Each party shall pay, as follows, the cost of the consulting contract to be obtained
to conduct a countywide nexus study for affordable housing: PINELLAS
COUNTY 61%; CITY OF CLEARWATER 12%; and CITY OF ST.
PETERSBURG 27%; and
2.3 Upon notification from PINELLAS COUNTY that an invoice amount is owed to
the contractor, each party shall timely remit its payment directly to the contractor
in accordance with the Florida Prompt Payment Act, Fla. Stat. S 218.70, et seq.,
and notify PINELLAS COUNTY that payment has been remitted; and
2.4 Each party shall cooperate fully in any contractual disputes that may arise as a
result of this Agreement, bearing any related costs pro rata.
3. AMENDMENTS: This Agreement may be amended in writing by consent of the
parties hereto.
4. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Agreement and any amendments thereto shall become
effective upon filing with the Clerk of the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Florida and
shall expire upon the delivery of the Nexus Study for Affordable Housing to the
Parties, and proper payment therefore.
5. TERMINATION: Any party hereto may terminate its participation in this Agreement
by notifying the remaining parties in writing not later than thirty (30) days prior to the
effective date of its withdrawal. A withdrawing party remains responsible for its pro
rata share of any costs already incurred up to the effective date of its withdrawal.
3
6. NON-APPROPRIATIONS: The obligations of the Parties as to any funding required
pursuant to this Agreement, shall be limited to an obligation in any given year to
budget and appropriate from legally available funds, after monies for essential
services have been budgeted and appropriated, sufficient monies for the funding that
is required during that year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties shall not be
prohibited from pledging any legally available non-ad valorem revenues for any
obligations heretofore or hereafter incurred, which pledge shall be prior and superior
to any obligation of the Parties pursuant to this Agreement.
[The Remainder of This Page Intentionally Left Blank}
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by
their duly authorized representatives on the day and date first above written.
THE CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
By:
Rick Baker
As Its Mayor
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:
City Attorney (Designee)
By:
Assistant City Attorney
[The Remainder of This Page Intentionally Left Blank}
5
CITY OF LARGO,
A Florida municipal corporation
ATTEST:
By:
City Manager
City Clerk
REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
City Attorney
[The Remainder of This Page Intentionally Left Blank}
6
Countersigned:
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
By:
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
City Attorney
City Clerk
William B. Horn II
City Manager
[The Remainder of This Page Intentionally Left Blank}
7
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political
Subdivision of the State of Florida, Acting by
and through its Board of County Commissioners
ATTEST:
KEN BURKE, Clerk
By:
By:
Kenneth T. Welch, Chairman
Deputy Clerk
REVIEWED AND APPROVED SUBJECT
TO PROPER EXECUTION:
Office of County Attorney
8
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,063
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Authorize settlement of all workers' compensation claims of Claimant, Thomas Stubblefield, in
their entirety to include medical, indemnity and attorney fees for the sum of $45,000 and
authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
Summary:
Mediation was held on April 11, 2006, and it was agreed to settle Claimant's claims, subject to
Council approval.
.Claimant, a firefighter for the City of Clearwater, sustained work related neck injuries on June
18, 2003, August 23, 2004, and December 22, 2004. As a result of the injuries the claimant
had two neck surgeries and sustained a permanent physical impairment with permanent
physical restrictions precluding his return to work as a firefighter.
.The Claimant retired as a consequence of his WC injuries, and is receiving a work related City of
Clearwater disability pension in the amount of $3,068.11 per month.
This settlement, if approved, will not affect the disability pension.
.The Claimant continues to receive active medical treatment for his injuries.
.Settlement of this claim is recommended as being in the best interest of the City by the City's
Claims Committee, the Risk Management Division, and the City's outside counsel, Mark Hungate.
Oriqinatinq: Finance
Section Consent Agenda
Cateqory: Agreements/Contracts - with cost
Number of Hard Copies attached: 0
Public Hearing: No
Financial Information:
~ Operating Expenditure
Bid Required? No
Bid Exceptions:
Sole Source
In Current Year Budqet?
Yes
Budqet Adjustment:
No
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
. ..................................................
Current Year Cost:
$45,000.00
Annual Operatinq Cost:
$45,000.00
For Fiscal Year:
10/01/2005 to 09/30/2006
Total Cost:
$45,000.00
Not to Exceed:
$45,000.00
Appropriation Code(s)
590-07000-545800-513-000
Review Approval
Maraie Simmons
Cvndie Goudeau
Tina Wilson
Garrv Brumback
Dick Hull
Bill Horne
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
Amount
$45,000.00
Comments
workers' compensation claims of
Claimant, Thomas Stubblefield,
04-14-2006 17:18:01
05-05-2006 13:39:56
04-17-2006 11:02:20
05-04-2006 08:59:32
04-17-2006 15:44:38
05-04-2006 20:24:09
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,079
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Approve a Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement with the Florida Department of
Transportation, District Seven, so that aesthetic improvements can be made to a portion of SR
60 (the east entrance to the Memorial Causeway Bridge and 770 feet west of the Memorial
Causeway Bridge) and adopt Resolution 06-29 authorizing execution of said Maintenance
Memorandum of Agreement.
Summary:
On March 2, 2006 the Council approved a Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for
the same purpose.
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has since informed staff that the MOA previously
approved by the Council was utilizing the incorrect MOA and the appropriate version of the MOA
needed to be approved.
Staff has reviewed the substituted agreement and recommends approval.
There are no substantive changes, just utilization of the correct FDOT MOA.
A copy of the Agreement is available for review in the Official Records and Leglislative Services
Department.
Oriqinatinq: Parks and Recreation
Section Other items on City Manager Reports
Cateqory: Other
Number of Hard Copies attached: 1
Public Hearing: No
Financial Information:
~ Other
Review Approval
Kevin Dunbar 04-27-2006 14:07:08
Garrv Brumback 05-04-2006 13:39:30
Laura Lioowski 05-04-2006 10:25:08
Bill Horne 05-04-2006 20:19:13
Cyndie Goudeau 05-05-2006 13:42:27
RESOLUTION NO. 06-29
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE A DISTRICT SEVEN HIGHWAY
BEAUTIFICATION MAINTENANCE MEMORANDUM OF
AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (FDOT), PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, State Road 60 (Memorial Causeway) serves as the major
thoroughfare to Clearwater Beach for residents and tourists daily; and
WHEREAS, FDOT owns State Road 60 right-of-way consisting of road
improvements, medians and grassed areas abutting thereon located between the east
entrance to the Memorial Causeway Bridge and 770 feet west of the Memorial
Causeway Bridge; and
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has maintained this portion of State Road 60
for over 30 years; and
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater desires to further improve and beautify this
right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Manager to execute a
District Seven Highway Beautification Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement in order
to meet the City's long-range goal of beautifying and maintaining the Memorial
Causeway, now, therefore
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to enter into a
District Seven Highway Beautification Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement with
the Florida Department of Transportation.
Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of
,2006.
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Laura Lipowski
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Resolution No. 06-29
MOA 01-06
DISTRICT SEVEN HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION
MAINTENANCE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the day of
2006, by and between the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, a
component agency of the State of Florida, hereinafter called the "Department" and
the CITY OF CLEAR WATER, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, existing under the
Laws of Florida, hereinafter called the "City".
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Department owns State Road 60 (Court Street and Memorial Causeway)
right-of-way consisting of road improvements and grassed areas abutting thereon located between
Court Street at Oak A venue Oak A venue and Memorial Causeway 770 feet west of the bridge in
Pinellas County, Florida (the "Project Highway"); and
WHEREAS, the Department has responsibility for operation and maintenance of the State
Highway System; and
WHEREAS, the Project Highway is beautified by improvements which enhance its aesthetic
quality; and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to install and maintain those improvements in accordance
with the provisions below; and
WHEREAS, the Department is authorized pursuant to Section 335.055, Florida Statutes to
enter into contracts with counties and municipalities to perform routine maintenance work on the
State Highway System within the appropriate boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto recognize the need for entering into an agreement designating
and setting forth the responsibilities of each party in maintaining the improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City has authorized its officers to execute this Agreement on its behalf,
NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual benefits that flow each to the
other, the parties covenant and agree as follows:
1. The City shall install and maintain those improvements to the Project Highway as
specified in the Construction Plans and Specifications attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and the
Maintenance Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B", all of which are hereby incorporated herein and
made a part hereof by this reference and all of the work in connection therewith being hereinafter
referred to as the "Project". Except as permitted in this agreement, the City shall not modify the
Project without prior written approval of the Department.
2. In the event that any portion of the Project is at any time determined by the
Department to not be in conformance with all applicable laws, rules, procedures and guidelines of
the Department, or is determined to be interfering with the safe and efficient operation of any
transportation facility, or is otherwise determined to present a danger to public health, safety, or
welfare, said portion shall be immediately brought into departmental compliance at the sole cost and
expense of the City.
3. The Department recognizes that the City must comply with Section 166.241, Florida Statutes.
This Agreement shall not be construed to modify, in any way, the City's obligations under those
statutes.
4. Maintenance of the Project shall be subject to periodic inspections by the Department. In the
event that any of the aforementioned responsibilities are not carried out or are otherwise determined
by the Department not to be in conformance with the applicable Project standards, the Department
may terminate the agreement in accordance with paragraph lO(a).
5. The Department's Area Maintenance Office shall be notified forty-eight hours in advance of
commencing any scheduled construction or maintenance activities. Emergency repairs shall be
performed without delay and the Area Maintenance Office notified immediately. The Area
Maintenance Engineer with respons!bility for the roadway within this Project is Mr. Brian Bennett,
P.E.,located at 5211 Ulmerton Rd., Clearwater, Florida, telephone number (727) 570-5101.
6. Prior to any major Project construction or reconstruction acti vity, the City shall submit plans
of the proposed work to all utilities with facilities within the limits of work for their review and
comment. The City shall resolve any conflicts and/or concerns raised by the utilities prior to
commencement of such activities. Prior to commencing any field activity on this project, the City
shall notify all the utilities of their work schedule enabling facilities to be field located and marked to
avoid damage.
7. If the City desires to position vehicles, equipment, or personnel, or to perform maintenance
activities closer than fifteen feet to the edge of pavement, or to close a traffic lane, Maintenance of
Traffic shall be in accordance with the Project plans and all Departmental Maintenance of Traffic
Regulations. The permittee shall have Maintenance of Traffic certified personnel supervise the set
up and operation of such Maintenance of Traffic devices at the site of the construction or
maintenance activity.
8. The Department will require the City to cease operations and remove all personnel and
equipment from the Department's right-of-way if any actions on the part of the City or
representatives of the City violate the conditions or intent of this agreement as determined by the
Department.
9. It is understood between the parties hereto that any or all of the Project may be removed,
relocated or adjusted at any time in the future as determined to be necessary by the Department in
order that the adjacent state road be widened, altered or otherwise changed to meet with the future
20f5
criteria or planning of the Department. The Department shall give the City notice regarding such
removal, relocation or adjustment and the City shall be allowed sixty calendar days to remove all or
part of the Project at its own cost. The City will own that part of the Project it removes. After the
sixty calendar days removal period, the Department may remove, relocate or adjust the Project as it
deems best. Wherever the City removes improvements pursuant to this agreement, the City shall
restore the surface of the affected portion of the project premises to the same safe and trafficable
condition as existed prior to installation of such improvements.
10. This Agreement may be terminated under anyone of the following conditions:
(a) By the Department if the City, following fifteen working days written notice, fails to
perform its maintenance responsibilities under this Agreement.
(b) By the City following sixty calendar day's written notice.
(c) By the Department following sixty calendar day's notice.
11. Within 60 days following a notice to terminate pursuant to lO(a) or lO(b), if the Department
requests, the City shall remove the Project and restore the Project premises to the same safe
condition existing prior to installation of the Project. If the Department does not request such
restoration or terminates this Agreement pursuant to 1 O( c), the Department may remove, relocate or
adjust the Project as it deems best.
12. To the extent provided by law, the City shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the
Department and all of its officers, agents and employees from any claim, loss, damages, cost, charge,
or expense arising out of any act, error, omission, or negligent act by the City, its agents, or
employees, during the performance of the Agreement, except that neither the City, its agents, or its
employees will be liable under this paragraph for any claim, loss, damage, cost, charge or expense
arising out of any act, error, omission, or negligent act by the Department or any of its officers,
agents, or employees during the performance of the Agreement.
When either party receives notice of a claim for damages that may have been caused by the
other party in the performance of services required under this Agreement, that party will immediately
forward the claim to the other party. Each party will evaluate the claim, and report its findings to
each other within fourteen working days and jointly discuss options in defending the claim. A party's
failure to promptly notify the other of a claim will not act as a waiver of any right herein.
13. The Department's District Secretary shall decide all questions, difficulties, and disputes of
any nature whatsoever that may arise under or by reason of this Agreement, the prosecution, or
fulfillment of the service hereunder and the character, quality, amount, and value thereof; and his
decision upon all claims, questions, and disputes shall be final and conclusive upon the parties
hereto.
14. This Agreement embodies the entire agreement and understanding between the parties hereto
and there are no other agreements or understandings, oral or written, with reference to the subject
matter hereof that are not merged herein and superseded hereby.
3 of 5
15. This Agreement may not be assigned or transferred by the City, in whole or in part without
consent of the Department.
16. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State
of Florida.
17. All notices, demands, requests or other instruments shall be given by depositing the same in
the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified with return receipt:
(1) If to the Department, address to District Landscape Architect, at Florida Department
of Transportation, MS 7-1200, 11201 N. McKinley Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612-
6456 or at such other address as the Department may from time to time designate by
written notice to the City; and
(2) If to the City address to Michael D. Quillen, P.E., City Engineer, City of Clearwater,
100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 or at such other address as
the City from time to time designates by written notice to the Department.
All time limits provided hereunder shall run from the date of receipt of all such notices,
demands, requests and other instruments.
4of5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
a municipal corporation
of the State of Florida
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By:
By:
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
James V. Moulton, Jr., P.E.
Director of Transportation Operations,
District Seven
By:.
William B. Home
City Manager
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau (SEAL)
City Clerk
Attest:
Executive Secretary
(SEAL)
Legal Review:
Legal Review:
Office of the General Council, District 7
Laura Lipowski
Assistant City Attorney
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,075
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Ratify and confirm the City Manager's approval of the First Amendment to Station WSJT 94.1
Sponsorship Agreement to co-promote the Smooth Jazz Fest Concert on April 21, 2006 and April
22, 2006, located in Coachman Park. (consent)
Summary:
The City entered into an agreement with WSJT 94.1 on September 29, 2005, to co-promote and
produce a music concert as part of the Clearwater Fun 'N Sun Festival, which was presented at
Coachman Park on April 21, 2006 and April 22, 2006.
Ratify and confirm of this item puts conditions in place to address City conditions such as:
1. Inappropriate language by staff
2. Venue size
3. Sales taxes
Primary responsibilities of WSJT dealt with event promotion.
Staff is recommending that the Council ratify and confirm this action.
A general agreement will be brought forward to Council on June 1, 2006 to cover future shows
prior to their occurance.
A copy of the First Amendment to Sponsorship Agreement is available for review in the Official
Records and Legislative Services Department.
Oriqinatinq: Parks and Recreation
Section Consent Agenda
Category: Other
Number of Hard Copies attached: 0
Public Hearing: No
Financial Information:
~ Other
Review Approval
Kevin Dunbar
05-04-2006
13:06:30
Bill Horne
05-09-2006
10: 16:24
Cvndie Goudeau
05-09-2006
13:47:09
Garry Brumback
05-09-2006
07:52:15
FIRST AMENDMENT TO STATION WSJT 94.1
SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT
This Amendment is made and entered into this day of ,
2006 ("Effective Date") by and between WSJT 94.1, 9721 Executive Center Drive, Suite
200, St. Petersburg, FL 33773 ("hereinafter "WSJT") and the CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, (hereinafter "Vendor") (each
individually referred to herein as "Party" or collectively as the "Parties").
WHEREAS, the Parties entered into that certain Station WSJT 94.1 Sponsorship
Agreement ("Agreement") dated September 29, 2005, (attached hereto and made a part
hereof) and now agree to amend the Agreement as provided for herein; and
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1 . Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are
incorporated herein by reference.
2. It is understood that WSJT and the Vendor will co-promote the festival on
April 21, 2006 and April 22, 2006, known as "Smooth Jazz Fest Concert" in Coachman
Park, located at 301 Drew Street, Clearwater, Florida. It is understood that this will be a
paid event open to the public and that WSJT is the title/presenting sponsor of the event.
3. It is also understood that the Vendor has a sound policy for its concerts
which absolutely must be adhered to and Vendor reserves the right to implement its policy
at its discretion. The policy set by the Vendor mandates that the music for this festival at
Coachman Park must be completed by 9:00 p.m.
4. It is also understood that the Vendor has established safe capacity limits for
Coachman Park. For this festival a maximum of 12,500 tickets will be sold through
Ticketmaster and/or day of show.
5. Lewd, Obscene or Violent Behavior. WSJT shall comply with all applicable
Federal, State and local law while occupying the Venue for the Event. No lewd, indecent,
or obscene conduct or language shall be included in activities or events presented by
WSJT, its affiliates, respective officers, directors, employees agents and representatives
(collectively "WSJT Representatives") or any of their successors or assigns. In addition,
WSJT Representatives shall refrain from encouraging illegal drug usage. WSJT hereby
recognizes that any such references or encouragement will reflect negatively on the City of
Clearwater and may be in violation of law. WSJT further agrees that the Vendor or its
agents may, in their discretion, order WSJT to immediately vacate the Venue if WSJT fails
to cure any of the following: (a) if the Event is indecent or obscene in violation of law; (b) if
employees or agents of WSJT engage in disorderly conduct as provided by law or; (c) if
the actions of WSJT incite violence, threaten or result in an immediate breach of the peace
as provided by law. Further, WSJT agrees that WSJT Representatives shall not use the
word "Fuck", or any variations thereof, at any time during the Event. Any such use shall
result in a monetary fine of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) per
occurrence and shall be deducted as a penalty expense from WSJT revenues to be paid
hereunder, prior to the Vendor's issuance of such revenues due.
6. Public Safety. Interruption or Termination of the Event. WSJT agrees that it
will at all times conduct its activities with full regard to the public safety, and will observe
and abide by all applicable regulations and requests by the Vendor and all other duly
authorized governmental agencies responsible for the public safety. Duly authorized
representatives may enter the Venue at any time and on any occasion without any
restrictions whatsoever. All areas of the Venue shall remain under the control of the
Vendor. Further, Vendor shall retain the right to cause interruption of any performance in
the interest of public safety and to likewise cause the termination of such performance
when in the sole judgment of the Vendor such act is necessary in the interest of the public
safety.
7. The Vendor, as part of its partnership with WSJT, will utilize its Ticketmaster
account for the sale of tickets to the Smooth Jazz Fest Concert. The Vendor, upon receipt
of the final settlement from Ticketmaster, will deposit the check into the Vendor's events
development account. The Vendor will then issue a check to WSJT for the amount of the
check minus any deductions outlined in the agreement or additionally agreed upon by the
promotions department for the station.
8. This paragraph hereby sets forth the State Sales Tax responsibilities of
each partner in regards to ticket sales for the April 21, 2006 and April 22, 2006 Smooth
Jazz Fest Concert.
. State tax is collected by Ticketmaster on all tickets sold through Ticketmaster and is
included in the gross sales amount reported by them.
. The check received by the Vendor from Ticketmaster is the gross sales amount
collected by Ticketmaster, including State Sales Tax, deducting other applicable
Ticketmaster fees.
. Said gross sales amount (including the sales tax), is the amount WSJT will use in
calculating and paying the State Sales Tax, which is their responsibility.
. Any sales tax generated on any tickets sold directly by WSJT is also the
responsibility of WSJT.
. The Vendor shall not be responsible for the payment of any sales tax whatsoever.
9.
effect.
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and
year first above written.
COUNTERSIGNED:
CITY OF CLEARWATER
By:
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
By:
Laura Lipowski
Assistant City Attorney
By:
William B. Horne, II
City Manager
By:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
WSJT 94.1
By:
Name:
By:
Name:
Title:
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,025
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Approve the applicant's request to vacate the north 268.65 feet of the 10-foot drainage and
utility easement lying along the east property line of Metes and Bounds Parcel Number 32-05,
located in Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, (a.k.a. 501-529 South Belcher Road),
subject to conditions, and pass Ordinance Number 7615-06 on first reading, (VAC2006-05 Ellis
and Company, Inc.).
Summary:
Applicant is seeking the vacation in order to redevelop the existing site, Gulf to Bay Plaza.
A flexible development case was reviewed by the Development Review Committee on January 5,
2006.
Progress Energy and Bright House Cable have no objections to the vacation request. Verizon and
Knology have facilities in the easement and will need to be compensated by the applicant any
costs associated with the relocation of their facilites.
In order to protect the utility company interest in this easement, the vacation ordinacnce has
been conditioned to provide for proof that the applicant has relocated to the satisfaction of the
owners of the utilities at the owner's expense with a six month time limitation which will sunset
the ordinance if not met.
The City of Clearwater does not presently have utility facilities in the easement portion proposed
for vacation.
Public Works Administration has no objections to the vacation request subject to the proposed
conditions.
Oriqinatinq: Engineering
Section Administrative public hearings
Category: Vacation of Easements and Rights of Way
Number of Hard Copies attached: 3
Public Hearing: Yes
Advertised Dates: 04/06/2006
04/06/2006
Financial Information:
Review Approval
Glen Bahnick
04-20-2006
16:50:37
Cvndie Goudeau
05-05-2006
13:44:57
Michael Ouillen
04-20-2006
17:06:20
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Garrv Brumback
05-04-2006 13:35:44
Bryan Ruff
04-25-2006 13:01:52
Bill Horne
05-04-2006 20: 16:33
ORDINANCE NO. 7615-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, VACATING THE NORTH 268.65 FEET OF THE
10-FOOT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LYING
ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF METES AND
BOUNDS 32-05, LOCATED IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 29
SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, Ellis & Co., L TD, owner of real property located in the City of
Clearwater, has requested that the City vacate the drainage and utility easement depicted
in Exhibit A attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that said easement is not necessary for municipal
use and it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City and the general public that the
same be vacated; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following:
The North 268.65 feet of the 10-foot drainage and utility easement lying along the East
property line of Metes and Bounds Parcel number 32-05, located in Section 19, Township
29 south, Range 16 East, subject to the following condition:
This vacation shall not be effective until the applicant has submitted to the City Engineer
proof that all existing utilities lying within the easement portion to be vacated have been
relocated to the satisfaction of the owners of said utilities and at the sole expense of said
applicant. If this condition has not been met within six (6) months of the date of approval of
this ordinance, this ordinance will thereafter be null and void in all respects as though never
adopted.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public records of
Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Bryan D. Ruff
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7615-06
610 576 577 578
609 SHELLEY ST
22/07
608
~
<Q~ #'
50 ~O~~ 23/02
33 ~ <<. /. 23/14 23/15
J- ~V ~ ,,~ I'- 24/0
...-- 23/18 23/19
(jN~ -.
('I)
(j~ N
:il
GULF- TO-SA Y SL VD
:il
32/04
Vacation Requested
By Applicant
32/03
33 36
10'
Drainage & Utility Easement
32/02
32/01
....--
32/121
PHASE
2
Q
It
It
UJ
:x:
(,)
...,J
UJ
IXl
CI)
32/05
PHASE
3
PHASE
4
N
W.JSt~E
~~'>!
S
City of Clearwater
Public Works Administration / Engineering
Vacate the North 268.65 feet of the 10-foot drainage and
utility easement lying along the east property line M&B
32-05.
Ordinance 7615-06 Drawn By:
DWG. NO V AC 2006-05 Grid #
S.K.
299A
Reviewed By:
S.D. Scale: 1" = 200 ft
S-T-R
18-29s-16e Date: 02/14/06
..--
0
L!)
0::
0
D NASH ST
z u[ ~I 1
~ w w
:2: <( ~ >
WHITMAN ST <(
oj I~ 0::
~~ 0 Z W
0 CHAUCER ST 0 ::J :2:
SI I~ --l
W S2
~ >
w
:2: SHELLEY ST z
0::
I I~ SHELLEY
GULF TO BAY BLVD
U PROJECT
0 SITE
0::
0
nn ~[ w
[ 0:: ~
W
I
0
--l
W
(l)
JAFFA PL w
--l
0::1 10:: --l
:>
z
0 w
BASCOM WAY 0 0
w
J 10:: RD
[2 GROVEWOOD w RD 0
~I I !I 0 0
I~ I-
U
:2: 0
MINNEOLA RD 0::
DR S
N
W xtlLE
~~
S
City of Clearwater
Public Works Administration / Engineering
Vacate the North 268.65 feet of the 1 a-foot drainage and
utility easement lying along the east property line M&B
32-05.
Ordinance 7615-06 Drawn By: S. K.
DWG. NO V AC 2006-05 Grid # 299A
Reviewed By: S.D. Scale: N.T.S
S - T - R 18-29s-16e Date: 02/14/06
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,071
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Approve the applicant's request to vacate the 30-foot utility easement retained over the vacated
portion of State Street that lies between Lots 9 and 20 of E.A. Marshalls Subdivision, (a.k.a.
1390 Sunset Point Road), and pass Ordinance 7651-06 on first reading, (VAC2006-08 Pathways
Community Church).
Summary:
The applicant, Pathways Community Church, is seeking vacation of the easement to allow for
future construction of a youth center.
Progress Energy, Bright House Cable, Knology and Verizon have no objections to the vacation
request.
The City of Clearwater has no utilities in the subject easement and no apparent need for this
easement in the future.
Public Works Administration has no objections to the vacation request.
Oriqinatinq: Engineering
Section Administrative public hearings
Cateqory: Vacation of Easements and Rights of Way
Public Hearinq: Yes
Advertised Dates: 05/04/2006
05/11/2006
Financial Information:
Review Approval
Glen Bahnick
Bryan Ruff
05-01-2006 14:41 :46
05-05-2006 13:43:55
05-01-2006 15:38:46
05-04-2006 13:36:51
05-02-2006 08:56:26
05-04-2006 20:17:26
Cvndie Goudeau
Michael Ouillen
Garrv Brumback
Bill Horne
ORDINANCE NO. 7651-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, VACATING THE 30-FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT
RETAINED OVER THE VACATED STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF STATE STREET LOCATED BETWEEN LOTS 9 AND 20
OF E.A. MARSHALL'S; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Pathway Community Church, owner of real property located in the City
of Clearwater, has requested that the City vacate the utility easement depicted in Exhibit A
attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that said easement is not necessary for municipal
use and it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City and the general public that the
same be vacated; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following:
the 30-foot utility easement retained over the vacated street right-of-way of
State Street located between Lots 9 and 20 of E. A. Marshall's, as recorded
in Plat Book 3, Page 44, of the Official Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
is hereby vacated, and the City of Clearwater releases all of its rights in the servitude as
described above to the owner of the servient estate thereto.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public records of
Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Bryan D. Ruff
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7651-06
20
. .. .
... .. .
... ..... .....
.. .. ... ..
. ... .... .
. ... . . .
. ... ... ..
. . . .. .
....... .. ...
. . .". ." ..' .
..." ........... ......
. ........ ....
.. ... .. . .. .
. . . .. . .. .
. ... .
. ...... ...
.. . .... .
.. . .. .
. ... ... ... . .
.. ... .. . . .
. .
....... . .. ...
. . . . . .. . . . . . .
. ..
. .... . .
.. ... . .... ....
.. ... .. ... .
. .. ... .... . ..
. .. . ... . . . . ... .
..... . ............
. ........
..... .......
... ... .. ... ....
. . . . ... . . .
.. ... .. .. .. .......
. .. .
... .. .
... ..... ..... .
.. .. . . . . .
. ... .... .
'. ..... ........ . .
. . . .. .
....... .. ...
. .. ..
.. .... .
.. ," ........... ......
. ........ .... .
.. ... .. . .. .
. . . .. . .. .
. ... .
. ...... ....
.. . .... .
.. . .. .
. ... ... ... . ..
.. ... .. . . .
. .
....... . .. ....
. . . . . .. . . . . . .
. ..
. .... . .
.. ... . .... ....
.. ... .. ... .
. .. ... .... . ..
. .. . ... . . . . ... .
..... . ............
. ........
..... .......
... ... .. ... ....
. . . . ... . . .
.. ... .. .. .. .......
. .. .
... .. .
... ..... ..... .
.. .. . . . . .
. ... .... .
. ... . . . .
. ... ... ..
.. . .. .
....... .. ...
. .. ..
.. .... .
.... ........... ......
. ........ .... .
.. ... .. . .. .
. . . .. . .. .
. ... .
. ...... ....
.. . .... .
.. . .. .
. ... ... ... . ..
.. ... .. . . .
. .
....... . .. ....
. . . . . .. . . . . . .
. ..
. .... . .
.. ... . .... ....
.. ... .. ... .
. .. ... .... . ..
. .. . ... . . . . ... .
o
4170
WILSON RD
00
~
<:(
~
<:(
lXl
It
<:(
lXl
,--
L-
00
o
N
W.JSt~E
~~'>!
S
City of Clearwater
Public Works Administration / Engineering
Vacate the 30' utility easement retained over the vacated
street r.o.w of State Street located between lots 9 and 20
EA Marshals Sub.
Ordinance 7651-06
S.K.
251B
Drawn By:
DWG. NO VAC 2006-08 Grid #
S-T-R
S.D. Scale: 1" = 200 ft
Reviewed By:
03-29s-15e Date: 04/17/06
ST
D
ST
[u
o
0:::
~T
ST
:::J
<(
woonl AWN
SEDEEVA
CIR S
.. ..
. .. ........ .. .......
. . .. . . .. .
C ". .:.::.: :::,: ".,': '.:.: ::"::'.::::.::.:<.: ;:iN.::.: :::,: ".,' :'.:.: ::"::'. ::.::.:<.: '::: :.::.
......~....
. ............. ....... .....
.::::,:...:.;.:.:.i::,::,::':::::.::.::;'::"::.::':":'i;.:.:. ..::;':::::':: ':'::'::;" PROJECT
'i:::) ::::t!:::~:..:..::..:.:.: :: ~:'::'i:::':(:i'::.::",: /i:.:: SITE
.. . .
ST
ST
IVA ST SEDEEVA
CJCJ
. . . .. . .
.:... : ,,-:-:..:.:.::.:.:.:::::'. .:. '-:'. :.:-. :::.:.:-::.:: :.....:....- ''-:':-:. ::.:.:-::::: :...... ".If? .:.:.::.:.:-::.::: :.....
: .:::. '.. : . ::~"::~~b.~:~ :.:: ::.;i:} :t::::t:::'::::.:::: .::::i:':':,: ::';i:;:::::: "::\\:':: '::i.::::i ":2:::; ::::t::.:::\ ."::::::ii :/:.i:~.;: ?(:::::)'\::::::::'::,::::
....T. . : :': ;.' :1;0' :.:.::. .;. :':t.;...... .:~ ;..:....:;.... .:.:.::. .;..:.....:;......:.:.::. .;.
c. '~W~...::.ii'i;im;i..\\;iij" ";i if; ifi};;',...U.:;:\?;'';'..
S2
m
RD
. . . .. . .. .
. . . .
.. . .... ... . .
.. . .... .
.. . ..
L
o
. ...... . .. .....
. . . . .. .
. .... .
. . .
. .
:: :.~.:: ::~f:~J:~.:~;:: ~.?;:/~~~:.~r. ~..
... .. .
..... ..... ..... .
. . ... . . . .
. ...... .
. ... . . . ... .
. .. . ... .
....... .. ...
. . .. .
.. .... .
"..." ." ..... ........
. ........ .... .
. .. .. . .. .
N
W xtlLE
~~
S
City of Clearwater
Public Works Administration / En
Vacate the 30' utility easement retained over the vacated
street r.o.w of State Street located between lots 9 and 20
EA Marshals Sub.
Grid #
S.K.
251B
Reviewed By:
S.D. Scale: N.T.S
Ordinance 7651-06
DWG. NO V AC 2006-08
Drawn By:
S-T-R
03-29s-15e Date: 04/17/06
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'.....,,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,062
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Approve a work order to McKim & Creed of Clearwater FI. (EaR), in the amount of $203,400 for
the Well 78 and Well 23 Improvement Project, project number 05-0078-UT, and that the
appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. (consent)
Summary:
The City of Clearwater's Wells 23 and 78are part of the wellfield network providing raw
water to the City's Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant No.!. Over the past several
months, well 78 has experienced a reduction in production and an increase in drawdown, and it
was noted that Well 23 had minimal drawdown and low chlorides and may be able to provide
increased capacity with no net impact to the water quality.
To bring Well 78 back to producing water ator near its original condition, Well 78 will be
hydraulically cleaned and the existing well pump will be replaced with a stainless steel
submersible well pump and a PVC Certa-Loc column pipe.
A specific capacity test and analytical testingon the subsequent water quality will be
conducted on Well 23 and a raw water pipe system model will be run to assure increased
production from this well will not impact the production of the other wells in the network.
McKim & Creed, an Engineer of Record (EOR),was selected to provide all of the above
services including submitting a letter for the Water Use Permit Reallocation to the SWFWMD in
the amount of $203,400.
The improvements will becompleted by April 2007.
A mid-year amendment will transfer $203,400.00 ofbudget and water revenue from the
Capital Improvement Program project 0315-96748, Water Treatment Facility, to 0315-96750,
Well Rehabilitation to fund this work order.
A copy of the work order isavailable for review in the Official Records andLegislative
Services office.
Originating: Engineering
Section Consent Agenda
Category: Agreements/Contracts - with cost
Number of Hard Copies attached: 0
Public Hearing: No
Financial Information:
~ Capital Expenditure
Bid Required? No
y
:~.
'.. ':"~, '
, .
'~ .. ~, , .'
. .~'.'.....,,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . ,/ ,. , /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
Bid Exceptions:
Sole Source
Budqet Adjustment:
Yes
Budqet Adjustment Comments:
See Summary Section
Total Cost:
$203,400.00
Appropriation Code(s)
0315-96750-561300-533-00
Review Approval
Glen Bahnick
Brvan Ruff
Bill Horne
Michael Ouillen
Cvndie Goudeau
Tina Wilson
Garry Brumback
Amount
$203,400.00
Comments
04-12-2006 11:36:30
04-19-2006 12:38:17
05-04-2006 20:20:35
04-18-2006 10:08:42
05-05-2006 13:41:23
04-19-2006 08:06:51
05-04-2006 09:00:22
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
McKIM & CREED WORK INITIATION FORM
DATE: Apri14, 2006
City Project No: 05-0078-UT
M/C Proj ect No:
1. PROTECT TITLE: Well 78 and Well 23 Improvements
2. SCOPE OF WORK:
SUMMARY
The City of Clearwater's Well 78 is part of the wellfield network providing raw
water to the City's Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant No. 1. Over the past
several months, the well has experienced a reduction in production and an increase
in drawdown. To investigate the reduction in flow, representatives from McKim &
Creed visited the well site and operated the well pump under different head
conditions. The results of our work indicate that Well 78 needs to be cleaned in an
effort to regain productivity.
In an effort to bring Well 78 back to producing water at or near its original condition
McKim & Creed proposes to hydraulically clean the well. In addition, with the
decision to upsize pumping capacity at Well 81, there will be a negative impact on
the pumping capacity at Well 78 that needs to be addressed by upsizing the pump
and motor. This work will include the design and construction to replace the well
pump with a stainless steel submersible well pump and a PVC Certa-Loc column
pipe. It is anticipated that some of the existing above ground piping can be reused
with the proposed pIan. McKim & Creed will complete a computer simulated
hydraulic model of the existing system to develop parameters for the selection of the
new well pump for Well 78.
In addition to Well 78 improvements, it was noted that Well 23 had minimal
drawdown and 10w chlorides and may be able to provide increased capacity with no
net impact to the water quality. This will be verified by conducting a specific
capacity test and analytical testing on the subsequent water quality. However, to
assure increased production from this well will not impact the production of the
other wells in the network, a raw water pipe system model is required to assess the
potential impacts. In addition, this model will be utilized to assess the potential
impacts from the nine proposed wells in the City's Well Expansion project. This
work will be done concurrently to the Well 78 cleaning and testing.
Once all the well cleaning, testing and modeling are complete, the Water Use Permit
will be modified to reallocate the permitted flow quantity from each well to
maximize the production of the system.
The following Scope of Work is proposed:
Well 78 and Well 23 Improvements
April 4, 2006
Page 2 of 9
SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1- Clean and Investigate Well 78
A. Hold a project kick-off meeting. Provide a project schedule with a list of
milestone tasks for discussion with the City of Clearwater. Schedule and tasks to
indicate that length of time the well will be off line. McKim & Creed, Hausinger,
hydrogeologist, and the City to attend the meeting. At the start of the project,
Hausinger to perform a short term specific capacity test with existing well
pumping equipment.
B. Hausinger to remove the existing vertical turbine pump. Hausinger to perform a
video 10g of the well to confirm length of casing and depth of the well.
Hausinger to the clean and chemically treat Well No. 78, perform follow-up suite
of geophysical 10gs: 10ng-short normal resistivity, static and pumping fluid
resistivity, and static and pumping flow. Downhole water samples will be
collected using a downhole sam pIer. Hydrogeologist will observe the sampling
and geophysical 10gging procedures. The downhole samples will be analyzed
for chloride, sulfate, TDS, iron, arsenic and corrosivity (Langlier Index). We
anticipate that three downhole samples and one pumping composite sam pIe will
be collected and analyzed. Hausinger to acid treat the open-hole section of the
well with hydrochloric acid. Spent acid will be neutralized with soda ash and
discharged to the municipal sewer system. The video survey will be reviewed
by the hydrogeologist to evaluate the condition of the casing and the borehole
wall. The borehole geophysical 10gs will be analyzed by the hydrogeologist to
delineate the depths of the producing zones in the well and the relative
contribution of each zone to the total flow from the well. The water quality data
will be reviewed to assess the water quality profile.
C. McKim & Creed will prepare and furnish a letter report describing the
procedures and results of the well investigation and recommendations will be
prepared and submitted to the City.
Task 2 - Well 78 Design/Build Services
A. Under Task 4, McKim & Creed will model raw water piping for WTP No.1 to
size new Well 78 submersible pump. McKim & Creed will select the largest
pump for Well 78 that will have the least affect on the operation of the other nine
(9) existing wells and five (5) proposed wells that are connected to WTP No.1
raw water piping.
Well 78 and Well 23 Improvements
April 4, 2006
Page 3 of 9
B. McKim & Creed to develop construction plans and specifications for the
replacement of the pump for Well 78 per City standards. The design will also
include civil site, mechanic aI, and electrical/instrumentation work relative to
installing the new well pump. McKim & Creed to attend Well 78 progress
meetings as necessary. McKim & Creed to prepare and submit PCDOH permit
and Building Department Permit.
C. Hausinger will mobilize/demobilize to well site, furnish and install 316 55
replacement submersible well pump (approximately 500gpm at 260' TDH),
furnish and install 6" Certa-Lok column pipe with 6" 55 check valve, furnish and
install one 6" 316 55 well head, furnish and install electrical modifications to
include light pole, power panel, generator receptacle, redevelop and rerun the
specific capacity test after the new 55 submersible pump is installed, chlorinate
well and collect samples, complete. Water quality analyses to be performed by
Southern Analytical Laboratories.
D. McKim & Creed to provide forty (40) hours of inspection services. McKim &
Creed to provide periodic engineer site visits. McKim & Creed to perform final
inspection and prepare Engineer's Certification for submittal to the PCDOH.
Task 3 - Well 23 Video Logging and Production Testing
A. Hausinger will mobilize to well site, pull the existing turbine pump and riser
pipes from the well, and deliver to the City's yard for storage. After pump is
pulled, Hausinger will run a 4-hour step test to determine well capacity and
provide static and dynamic geophysicallogs of the well. Following well testing,
Hausinger will prepare a Color Radial View video 10g of the well for the entire
depth of the well. Once all the testing is complete, Hausinger will reinstall the
VLS turbine pump back into existing well head and chlorinate well for sampling
through temporary discharge piping. 20 bacteriological samples will be collected
and analyzed and the results forwarded to the Department of Health for review
and approval. Upon written approval from the Department of Health, Hausinger
will re-assemble the discharge piping and place the well back into service.
B. After all the testing is complete, a technical memorandum outlining the findings
will be produced and provided to the City.
C. If during the course of the work it is determined that a new pump is desired or
repairs to the old pump are required, then these will be completed as additional
services.
Well 78 and Well 23 Improvements
April 4, 2006
Page 4 of 9
Task 4 - Raw Water System Hydraulic Analysis
A. McKim & Creed has done some preliminary modeling on the City's raw water
system supplying Water Treatment Plant No.1 (WTP), but has not completed the
same for WTP No.3. As such, the original model for WTP No.1 will be updated
and the City's GIS information will be imported for the WTP No.3 network. In
addition to the existing system, the nine (9) proposed well expansion sites and
piping will be integrated into the hydraulic models. After the base model is
complete, a copy will be forwarded to the City for review and comment on
network arrangement and sizes.
B. Once the model network has been completed and reviewed, the existing and
proposed pump curves will be integrated into the model.
C. Work with City staff to coordinate pressure and flow readings within the
existing networks and use these to calibrate the models.
D. With the completed models, McKim & Creed will run up to a total of 40
scenarios for both WTP No.1 and WTP No.3 raw water systems to make the
following determinations.
. Run a calibration baseline with the existing pump curves, pipeline
sizes, and realistic pump drawdown conditions for each system to
establish calibrated baseline conditions.
. With the calibrated models, run a scenario for each system using the
permitted flow forced into the model to determine the design head
conditions at each pump. Check this run against known water quality,
drawdown, and production data.
. With the calibrated models, run a scenario for each system using the
estimated flow at each site that produces acceptable water quality
within the current total system permitted capacity forced into the
model to determine the design head conditions at each pump.
. With the calibrated models and proposed additional well network,
run a scenario for each system using the permitted flow and the
proposed flow forced into the model to determine the design head
conditions at each pump.
. With the calibrated models and proposed additional well network,
run a scenario for each system using the actual flow and the proposed
flow forced into the model to determine the design head conditions at
each pump.
. Lastly, run up to 20 additional combinations and permutations of the
mode 1, adjusting pipe sizes, parallel mains, proposed pipe routes and
adjustments to Well 78 and 23 based on field findings in an effort to
make recommendations for the existing system improvements and
Well 78 and Well 23 Improvements
April 4, 2006
Page 5 of 9
proposed system design criteria. Various pipe network configurations
may be evaluated based on modeling results.
E. Compile the model findings into a draft letter report containing screen captures,
figures of the recommended piping network, well allocations, and system
recommendations for City review and comment. Upon receipt of City comments,
review and respond to City comments, revise model and compile a finalletter
report. Recommendations will be based on optimizing the existing wells to
achieve their current total system wide permitted capacity and to obtain 0.25
MGD from the proposed wells. If the City elects to increase pump age out of the
existing wells based on the results associated with the chloride cap increase,
additional modeling may be necessary and is not included in this scope of work.
F. The proposed modeling does not include water quality analysis. If during the
course of the work the City would like to develop a water quality mode 1, this can
be completed as additional services.
Task 5 - Water Use Permit Reallocation
A. Once the modeling effort is complete and the City concurs with the
recommended well allocations, prepare a Water Use Permit letter modification to
re-allocate the existing well permitted capacities to maximize the system
production to the known water quality limitations. Any permit fees will be paid
by the City.
B. Upon receipt, McKim & Creed will respond to one request for additional
information (RAI) from the SWFWMD.
C. This effort will have to be completed around the chloride cap letter mod and the
permit application for additional flow. Depending on scheduling, this may be
incorporated into the application for additional flow.
3. PROTECT GOALS - WORK PRODUCTS:
Well 78
. Letter Report discussing findings and recommendations from Well 78
cleaning, 10gging, and water quality analysis (3 copies)
. 50% Design Plans and Specifications for Well 78 Design (5 copies)
. 100% Design Plans and Specifications for Well 78 Design (5 copies)
. Rehabilitation of Well 78
. New SS submersible well pump, PVC Certa-Loc column pipe, wellhead and
site improvements complete.
Well 78 and Well 23 Improvements
April 4, 2006
Page 6 of 9
Well 23
. Production testing results (1 copy)
. Video Log (1 copy)
. Draft Letter Report discussing findings and recommendations from Well 23
video 10gging, and capacity testing (3 copies)
. Final Letter Report incorporating the City's comments (3 copies)
. Bacteriological Test Results
. Department of Health Permit
Hydraulic Modeling
. Base model with existing system and proposed improvements
. Draft Letter Report discussing findings and recommendations from the
modeling scenarios (3 copies)
. Final Letter Report incorporating the City's comments (3 copies)
Water Use Permit
. Modification Letter with supporting documentation.
. RAI Response
All final design documents, specifications, and project reports need to be submitted in
electronic format prior to project close-out.
4. BUDGET
The services outlined herein will be performed for a Fixed Fee of $203,400 In
accordance with the Engineer of Record Contract, distributed as outlined below;
Task 1- Clean and Test Well 78
Task 2 - Well 78 Design/Build Services
Task 3 - Well 23 Logging and Production Testing
Task 4 - Raw Water System Hydraulic Analysis
Task 5 - Water Use Permit Modification
Total
$40,325
$96,850
$21,700
$32,125
$12,400
$203,400
5. SCHEDULE
We propose the following schedule to complete the tasks as outlined below:
Task 1- Well 78 Investigation
. Clean and Test Well 78
. Well 78 Test Results
. Draft Letter Report Submittal
. City Review Comments Received
. Final Letter Report Submittal
Weeks after NTP
6
8
10
12
14
Well 78 and Well 23 Improvements
April 4, 2006
Page 7 of 9
Task 2 - Well 78 Design/Build Services
. 50% Design Submittal
. City Review Comments Received
. 100% Design Submittal
. Furnish and install new well pump
18
20
24
36
This schedule is based on the approach that Task 1 and Task 2 will occur one after
the other.
Task 3 - Well 23 Video Logging and Production Testing
. RemovefTestNideo Well
. Technical Memorandum of Findings
8
10
This schedule is based on the approach that Task 3 will occur concurrently to Tasks 1
and 2.
Task 4 - Raw Water System Hydraulic Analysis
. Update/Populate/Calibrate Model
. Complete Model Analysis
. Draft Letter Report Submittal
. City Review Comments Received
. Final Letter Report Submittal
8
12
16
18
20
This schedule is based on the approach that Task 4 will occur concurrently with
Tasks 1 and 3 and before Task 2.
Task 5 - WUP Reallocation
. Compile Data into Letter Modification
. Submit Letter Modification
. Respond to RFI
24
28
34
This schedule is based on the approach that Tasks 5 will occur after Tasks 1, 3 and 4
are complete and concurrent to Tasks 2.
6. STAFF ASSIGNMENTS:
City: Glenn Daniel, Rob Fahey, Lan-Anh Nguyen
McKim & Creed: Jeff Lowe, Norman Scally, Dan Cote, Bryan Nicely
7. CORRESPONDENCE/REPORTING PROCEDURES:
All McKim & Creed Correspondence shall be directed to Jeff Lowe. All City
correspondence shall be directed to Glenn Daniel, with copies to Lan-Anh Nguyen
and Rob Fahey.
Well 78 and Well 23 Improvements
April 4, 2006
Page 8 of 9
8. INVOICINGIFUNDING PROCEDURES:
Please invoice monthly for work performed as detailed In McKim & Creed
Continuing Contract.
Charge this work to City Code No: 0315-96750-561300-533-000-0000
Invoices will be transmitted to the City of Clearwater, Attention: Marty Pages, 100 S.
Myrtle Ave., #220, Clearwater, FL, 33756-5520, or P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL,
33758-4748.
9. ENGINEER CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify as a licensed Professional Engineer, registered in accordance with
Florida Statute 471, that the above project's site and/or construction plans meet or
exceed all applicable design criteria specified by City municipal ordinance, State, and
Federal established standards. I understand that it is my responsibility as the
project's Professional Engineer to perform a quality assurance review of these
submitted plans to ensure that such plans are free from errors and/or omissions.
Further, I accept that the City's Final Inspection for a Certificate of Occupancy does
not relieve me of my own quality assurance review. I hereby certify that all facilities
have been built substantially in accordance with the approved permit design plans
and that any substantial deviations (described in attachment) will not prevent the
system from functioning in compliance with the requirements of applicable
regulatory authority.
This certification shall apply equally to any further revision and/or submittal of plans,
computations, or other project documents that I may subsequently tender.
10. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: None
PREPARED BY:
McKim & Creed:
A. Street Lee, PE
Vice President
Date:
CITY:
Date:
Michael D. Quillen, PE
City Engineer
Well 78 and Well 23 Improvements
April 4, 2006
Page 9 of 9
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
WORK ORDER INITIATION FORM
Attachment" A"
CITY DELIVERABLES
FORMAT
The design or survey plans shall be compiled utilizing one of the following two
methods.
1. City of Clearwater CAD standards.
2. Pinellas County CAD standards
3. Datum: Horizontal and Vertical datum shall be referenced to North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 (vertical) and North American Datum of 1983/90 (horizontal). The unit
of measurement shall be the United States Foot. Any deviation from this datum will
not be accepted unless reviewed by City of Clearwater Engineering/Geographic
Technology Division.
An AutoCAD LandDesktop 3.0 or later drawing file with all dependent files shall be
submitted. NOTE: If approved deviation from Clearwater or Pinellas County CAD
standards are used the consultant shall include all necessary information to aid in
manipulating the drawings including either PCP, CTB file or pen schedule for
plotting. The drawing file shall include only authorized fonts, shapes, line types or
other attributes contained in the standard AutoDesk, Inc. release. All block
references and references contained within the drawing file shall be included. Please
address any questions regarding format to Mr. Tom Mahony, at (727)562-4762 or
email addresstom.mahony@clearwater-fl.com
y All electronic files must be delivered upon completion of project or with
100% pIan submittal to City of Clearwater.
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'.....,,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,076
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Approve the final plat for "HAROLD COURT TOWNHOMES PHASE II" located at 607 Indiana
Avenue, south of Turner Avenue. (consent)
Summary:
* This is a replat of lots 5 and 6 and part of lot 10, Marshall and Brandon's Sub., and lot 10
block 20 Magnolia Park. and consist of approximately .35 acres.
* The property is within the city limits of Clearwater.
* The final plat will create 8 Townhome lots
* The proposed project was approved by DRC on June 30th, 2005
* The property is zoned as Downtown
* A copy of the plat is available for review in the Office of Official Records & Legislative Services
Oriqinatinq: Engineering
Section Consent Agenda
Cateqory: Plat Files
Public Hearinq: No
Financial Information:
Review Approval
Glen Bahnick 04-24-2006 16: 10:35
Garrv Brumback 05-04-2006 09:00:58
Glen Bahnick 04-25-2006 08:53:34
Bill Horne 05-04-2006 20:21:17
Cyndie Goudeau 05-05-2006 13:40:44
ST
~ D J ~qjRICKS ~I ~ ~
D~~~n b D Cr
~[8D I I D~c:J
~ ST loll PARK I D~D~
PIERCE ......,
o PIERCE ST
Dt lRANKUN I D Q ~
RT ST CJ I ~I D D~ ~
~~D+3EYI~SR60\ D D~~ ~
ST CHESTNUT ST ----e-
o n~n IROGERS I
[
s
UJ
0::
o
~UUJ
--l <.9
z
Peach c2
o
PINE
UJD~
> 0
<(
DRUID RD
I I
JASMINE
~ SR.
~DUJ
(f) >
e
0... <( GROVE
ST
I
D~
CLEVELAND
ST
SR. 60
ST
PROJECT
SITE
TURNER
'\' Crescent
~D
'"
IW
I
RD
D
PINE
D
DD
PINE
DRUID
WAY
JASMINE
WAY
N
W-JSt7.LE
;<~
5
City of Clearwater
Public Works Administration / Engineering
Harold Court Townhomes Phase II
Drawn By: S. K.
Grid # 295B
Reviewed By: T.M. Scale: N.T.S
S - T - R 16-29s-15e Date: 04/24/06
z
o
~
o
~
U;
~
>
>
~
~
o
o
~
o
o
"
OJ
o
~
>
~
I
ii
j
U;
~
o
ii
Ii
o
~
S
'"
~
~
C
~
o
~
>
z
o
~
o
~
o
~
~
I
~
~
~
"
>
z
o
~fJj
rffi s:
moo..,.."
,,00 /U
d ()l
[0,,>
Om
~"~
~
~
H
, .
rj"J;l
, ,
m ~
. :.
~ 2
~ ~
I a
~ CD
~ ~
o ;Ii
, iJi
~ ~
~ ~
> S1
~ ~
;::
'"
~
u;
>
~
o
~
~
z
>
;::
g
~
c
~
'"
u;
"
~
~
~
~
~
~
<
.
~
.
~
o
"
~~ Ii ~
~~ ~th
~~ ~~
~~ ~~
'i0l ...'"
C'I)> 00
~~ ~~
ulQ ~~
S!tl r
loa ;~
~~ 8~
!il~ :~
~~ ~~
IT'Ie l)Q
~o~ IT'I~
~~
iil~ ~~
)> :t~
~ ~~
z CO
~ ~d
~ AJ;t
U1 ~,."
; ~~
a~
~~
~ O~
~ ~o
~ ~~
~ r~
;0 ';-<
~ ~~
o~
~ ~~
IT'I :<r
~ ~~
~ ~~
S! ~~
; ~;
~~
~ 00
Oz
~~
! :
. ~
< ~
I 0
> ~
z ~
o S1
~ ~
~ =
r. ~
~ !
~
U; 0
I ~
I
I ~
~ p
o 5
~
o
o
i
o
o
~
o
~
u;
>
"
^
z
o
~
"
~
.
~
.
~
e
o
z
~
~
z
c
;::
~
~
0- ~
II ~
~~ :s;
~~ ~
-~~ ~
,< ~
~~ ~
~~ ~
~c ~
;~ d
lid ()
!~ ~
i!r;1 ~
2~
ffi3 :j
.0
~3 ~
" ~
~~ ~
;!!~ ~
~~ ~
~~ <fl
>;;1
~~ ~
Z:c ~
;~
~~
Iii~
~~
8~
,U;
1l;2
.>
>~
~~
~a
>,
?J~
~~
0>
~~
"0
~I
a
~
<
o
;
o
o
.
,
~
"
i
F
~
"
~
o
e
~
~
'"
~
~
~
ffl
o
,
g ~
~
,
~
"
>
"
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I d
I
I .
I)> ~
~ ~
, '
~ ~
>
z
o
~
u;
,
>
I
>
~
~.~
r' ~
~~~
~~:
C~C
::l;O~
e,,~
~"O
~~~
~Ul~
0><
~~~
~!~
rr1p~
[;iea
S;\!!(D
~;?j-<
ze~
ce'"
E=<!~
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
;;I"~
;~~
;~~
~ 'Ul
~~~
Or
g~~
~~~
U1~Vl
~"
<0
~~
~I
~:
Blg
~\l!
~r;
=to
~~
~2
a~
:~
a,"
~~
~~
~~
ll~
~S
~
$-' !'lRl:-~
~ ~~~~
o O~-1~
~ ~~~~
~ ~~jffi
o ~~~~
a ~~Cd
~ ?Zffi~5
! !:j~
a ~~~
~ ~ll~
c UlUl;:
:::I rr1)>Cl
~ ~~~
';! ~e;~
<Jl ~~~
s:: 02)>-
IT'I ZUlZ
Z ~':z
~
~ : i
i ~ !
a
~ ~ i
~ ~ ;
~ ~ 0
z ~ 0
e; ~ ~
~ @
~ II a
~ ~ ~
o ~ "
~ 0 z
a ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ Q ~
c
o ~
~ e ~
i j :
~ ~ ~
~
~o ~
~,
"
~~ z
::::~ )>
:-~ ~
~~ ~
?Z~ ~
~; ~
-rJjl 0
~ ~ jl
Ulfl!! ~
~~ ~
~~
a~ 0
A~ 0::
~~ ~
~~ ~
~o
~.; i
u;
~
c
~
o
~
~
~O
~~
a~
~'"
~~
~>
20
~5
~.; ~
2A ~
"z
Zo
~~
~~ ~
F~ ~
l;~ (')
g~ ~
~e ~
. ~ >
~, ~
~~ ;g
~:t Or;;
~~
Ui:t ~
IU;
I ~ ~
I "
~~ ~
>~ "
;~ ~
~ F.
~
>
~
~
~
~
~
~
NO
00
Plel
~
<
~
o
~
~
F
'"
~
o
~
o
~
o
>
~
~
~
~
~
>
z
o
~
.
>
"
~
I
>
~
m
"
>
z
o
o
z
'"
~
e
m
o
~
~
,
r
>
m
o
o
,
"11
r-
:t>
""l
01
o
o
'"
......
~
I;) :t> .,.
1Tl::o~
~1Tl~
,":l ~ ::0
o:t>:t>o
_r-""l
""lr-Or-
-<r-'T1
O::S r- 0
'T1:c:O
01;) ,...
r- iil" J
~~1JI0
::0 ~:t> c::
~~~::o
""lCllOl-.!
1Tl1Tl' ""l
,::0 ~ ~ ""I
"11-::00
~~CIl~
~CIl~ ~
r- ..... r- "'S
:t>1JIr-c;.
CIl ~ I/o ::t
00010
0.....::0 SE:
C::Ol:t>
:C:' :c:
""loOrn
~~~C/)
r-:C:CIj
OCllCll "tJ
~~~ ~
:t>~o ~
10 - C/)
CIlS
g a rn
_~ ,:c: ::::
~
:c:
I;)
ITl
.....
1JI
~
CIl
""l
"
>
z
o
I
I
I
I
I
~ !
o
~
~
~
5
~
~ ~
i
)>o)>o:;Ol>
UlZrrlr
:;oo;:::jr
~~~~
~~~~
~A~~
-<:;o~:;o
~~~~
oo::UlC'l
~~;~
lJ>UlO
~~~~
::j~~S!!
or:I:iil
;~~~
rrlOzn
" I
""z:I:l>
~~~~
;~~"3
~~~~
~.." -I
v, _>
zz-
;Errloo
FDl:t-rJ
~~~A
~o:t""
-IZrrl5
;El>lJ;!;!
:t~0~
:~~~
rrI~......2
i![A~ffl
rrlOO::"
,>>
> Zz
FOrrlO
~~~~
Oo~-I
zZil~
_~~rr1
!~i~
:;;:~l;~
':'-' Ul:;O
~I'
~~~
~~-I
<~
~~
~
o
>
.
>
"
~
~
U;
~
~
o
~
o
z
~
I
>
Z
o
>
,
,
<
a
~
,
"
"
~
>
~
~
.
~
"
"
>
~
a
o
"
o
m
>
~
m
<
>
,
>
"
~
o
c
>
"
~
?i
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
'"
~
~
o
~
o ~
~ ~
< 0
'" '
~ ~
~ ~
,
>
"
~
>
o
o
o
"
o
~
a
~
,
e
m
ii
"
~
o
o
"
o
~
o
,
~
o
o
e
z
.<
~
~
--
en "tI
:to
I'T1 !D
I'T1
-t
-
o "tI
." ~
'"
~
o .
. D:Ii"'"
r
f'l
II I I! !! III
il! ~ ~ g~ ~ 5 ::
h · ~i i l
c: c .!:
~? ~!
~
2
.- x
~
n ~
~ I
< ~
I i
<
i
~
~~g
[:.~
li'i
;[~
.:. a~
it!
~[~
~:ra
~g~
~Ji
~-.
H~
Hi
O'i'i'~
!H
i-!l
H!
~~~.
23[
~~i.
~td
0.
wi ~.
~~. () LI~
[Oct 'p
Om
~.~
~
o
lJ-j~
q[j~ ~
~ X ZTI r
0- CD ~ pl ~
aw~~g
~_ ffi~ ~~
pB~~~
8~t-.rnpl
3OJ~~~
ct'
ro
l>
C
rrz
N_~
8:g ~ ~
d d )> tTj
~g: ~ ~
~ ~ '"
r-
'"
o
;;;:~ ~
0i;S ~
m
o
co
m ~
o ro
< ,
"j" (t]
o .
~ ~
ro ,
o <
ct ro
rn '<
o
[JJ ,
ro w
, .
~. 1]
ro rn
w "
"
~
w
------,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
I
,
I
I
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
"
~
6
- --- -----I
INDIANA A VENUE
64.00' RIGHT OF WAY PER PLAT BOOK 1 , PAGE 27
c
~
~ N03'42'130[
J:
p )>
8_ ~
~ 0
~ r
Sl U
0 (J
0
i\i c:
':l ~
..,
116.30'
u
....
'"
'-!
~
\
ClI il, _
'" ~! ~ ...
~ ~- 5oo'OO'oo'E 29.00'
sOO'OO'oo"E 29.00' ~ ~
~- ~~I ~ I\) :;\
ell ~ i~'~ ~ ~
~ ~- i\i~I~ 5oo'OO'oo'E 29.00'
soo'OO'oo"E 29.00' llP~ r. ~
n;:;rl >-J -~
~ ~!Of
~ -~ilI - - - ~- --c.l :;\
f--.... - -~ - ! I ~
I ~
" I 5oo'OO'OO'E 29.00'
~ 8_
soo'OO'oo"E 29.00'
=1 il_
~-I .... ~
01 I ~
z
00
'"
-'
"!
"
'1
~
~ !~ ~
~ ;;;i!i z
i~~g -l
'ii:~2! 0
g~!:!!gj "T1
!.!j~ ffl
I ~:: ~
; ~~ ~ ~
. 'I Z
i': !'; 0
BEARINCREfERENCEUNE
500'OO'OOo[
116.52'
L017
MARSHALL P~j BRAN~~~~~eS~:DIVISION
II -II
. .
- . I
11,
I
.
.
.
------
en
00
'"
N
"!.
~
'"
~
~
~
~
~
~
....
':
"!
en
Dl
'"
N
'"
~
'"
'"
'"
io
"?
~o
'" <3
~ ~ .
II'~ CJ
~~
q~
~
o
Z'l---
'tl
r-
):,
""l
lXl
o
o
"
,'"
~
G) ):, :r:
rn :tJ ..._
1\1 rn ....
-":l ~ :tJ
n~~o
""lr-Or-
"" r- " .....
O::;r-'"
"::i!: 0 0
OG)""l
~~~O
:tJ ~ ):, c::
~:E~:tJ
"'i ~ ,01 ""'I
.~ g ~ ""'I
'tlQ:tJO
-::i!:CIl
~ CIl ~;E
:: ~ r- :c:
):,):,r-:r:
CIl::i!:11o
OOlXlO
Oii~==-
~. ::i!: 0:::.
~ogm
' ~::i!: VI
;n~lIi"tJ
O:tCll:r:
:!! =ti ~ ...-
01\1........
):,IO:::C/)
CIl S rn
O!(1
C::O__
.~.::i!:
~
::i!:
G)
rn
...
tI1
~
CIl
""l
en "tJ
:r: !lJ
~
--l
'"
"tJ
o !"l
"
'"
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'.....,,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,077
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Approve the final plat for "THE TOWNHOMES OF ANTIGUA BAY" located at 808 Osceola Ave, at
the intersection of Osceola avenue and Nicholson Street. (consent)
Summary:
* This is a replat of multiple lots in the Sue Barco Subdivision that will create 8 town homes lots.
* The property is within the city limits of Clearwater and is approximately 1.3 acres.
* The proposed project was approved by DRC November 11, 2004 and CDB on January 18,
2005.
* The property is zoned as Downtown
* A copy of the plat is available for review in the Office of Official Records & Legislative Services
Originating: Engineering
Section Consent Agenda
Cateqory: Plat Files
Public Hearinq: No
Financial Information:
Review Approval
Glen Bahnick 05-01-2006 12:43:38
Garrv Brumback 05-04-2006 13:35:01
Michael Ouillen 05-01-2006 15:40:53
Bill Horne 05-04-2006 20: 15:08
Cyndie Goudeau 05-05-2006 13:45:55
PROJECT
SITE
L-
a
..c
L-
eo
I
SPRING/jiJ
CEDAR
~OO
NICHOLSON
00
laD / fill I L
; ~ f I IlrDGIE~ [
MAPLE
ST
N
W "f!.LE
;t~
5
City of Clearwater
Public Works Administration / Engineering
The Townhomes Of Antigua Bay
Drawn By: S.K. Reviewed By: T.M. Scale: N.T.S
Grid # 277B S - T - R 09-29s-15e Date: 04/24/06
~ n ~~~~ii ~ ~ 1; " ",'" ., .r[r ~ lilflUr ~ t"'" g~
I i ... ~
I ~ I I ~Ot"''''oz
~ ! "f.~J il "oJ "'!::!~~>o
~~ ~!I; j ~ ~ I I I :8
~ J;~~" ~Jl~ ~I~ ~8'1 ~ [:jtr:lwz>-g;>
h ~ ~~000~
I ~~-.~ lI'alS'U~OIf O"llt;j~t:r:I
~~~ ~ ~e[r 88.if.~ I [~h O:~D:jo~
~~ 8.~~ "lng-I: ~I t;l~?>r,:z::;
h ~:!l~ ~ =]Ii''' "'~:@!l'. ~~g;~~
~I:l. ~ t n Ui:~i~h OOS=~8>
i~ ;~~~I ~a '( ah!l'1[f:: ~"'~z;;j;;'
.>~ ~h~~ [g"" ~-. ,,[tI~i' ~d:O~~
n ~~ ~ >'" i g=,,!I~:o ~~~~~~
h ~:l~~. [s ii 'Illi.d 1-Itr:l~S3oo
o!il:l~l i'!!, ~~ . .~ ~ :O;z<>",'"
~~ ~~ "J ~O:;nt"'l~l#l:'"4
~~~~ I, ' 8'f" I ~~ rIB o~o~"'~
~~ "~ Il.
~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ _1f~8.. 65!z~~0
~~ ~U~I \r ~i~" nil!lr~ Z~~~c;z
~ I f ~ 0003~o-lt::l~~
~ ~~~~~ I . ~ . I~~.~t:: ~,,=c;,,=
[~; Il'l ~~ll orrlOorn ~
~~~'>I :E~ZO",,,,
~~I IHl~~="j "'ZO~C:~ ==
Ihh ;> ta' .., ~ . ~~~~8~~
g,". 8"~~lg,' > =. ~ ~
z~>::~~
t::ll;fJzore~
z~o",Ot'"
00 t"'''',Z 0 ~
~S~:L~F;~
~""'~~"i'> 0
Io!j::::;WOO~()
>'. >000 ~
"'~~:"z~
~ n ~11;ii ~ 1; r ., i ~ii I E;~O~~~~
~ 1 i r ~ " >~~o""'oo Z
i ~ B ::;'" (")Ooo"ll::~1TI
~ ; I I ~ (h -<'" tr:l~O['J},:;d::Z::'"
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~B ~~5!~""'~z ==
h I~~~ ~ ~ g, 8l~ ~ ,,0 d~~~~~~
! ~ ~.i ~ t"'z 0
~ ~.. ' "'''' '-Hj~~~~~
~~ I~~i ~ " i!l' f;;j >'
~,.., ~~~0C:=r, ~
~ f.~ 1; :Eo ~zt-1VJ~trI_
!!' ".., >:E
~~ ,~~~ ~ a .:0 ('l ,..,z ~~~SJ>[:l:;!
~~ I' I i ~I ~ ",,,, ........>00::00 ~
.-=
~~ I~~~o :.o~ ~zz<tI:'t~~'T.l
~~ ~~[!j~~ ~ r g z~ ~~~~~~p rJJ.
Ji o~ ~ ~I~ n i:" "'''' ==z~;;lg~
.' ~ t"'o ~:~o~~~ 0
~~ ~,,~ l j ~J t"'c:
" >..... "'o"'z....."'~
~~ !~~~~ " "'=
>~ !!'O' ~ b ", ~~~~~O;;l ~
~>: ~~ ~~~I~ ~~ 0'- "'=....."'0121.-
~~ h c:~ 'T.l tr:I:ltI rn ~ I-g'"
~~ ~ ~~~~~ If" ~o o~~g~~~ >
~" . -<'" [:lc;..........O.....~
~ ~ ~~!;i H ~t;; oot"'=>c;~ Z
o ~. t"'", ",c:-<>~oo
~~~ ~ ~~'~ 0> "'zzz-<oz
J "Ii; S~ ~ooo~~,,,, ~
~E~~~ ~~ .~ ~~ 6l~"':EZ''''''
h > "'[;3"'=0...0 ~
~~ ~~ !""'~n:E~~
o",=z",,,, ~
;:~~~~ij
i:t""l~Z~N ~
o~:EnSJ::;
t""'OOtrllIll'O >
~;;~~n~
~~oo[:l= =
UI.f'''r1Z()~
pr ~~ ~~ I U~ ~ 00 ; " ~ ,;' ~ ~~>",o>
~~~f lUli ~ ;i ~ ~ >
h ,J ~ f ,. J ~ I;":l~;;l~~
o&l~" ~ I; JI ~~ n !.~If ~ ~ ~ [t ~ ~::;:>~SAtr.I ~
i~J ~h~ ~ J~~ ~ i ~ [ .. ......>-3'"d-
"I<[~f ~i g ::j~ !' ' h ~ ~ .. ~ ~~!ilz~;;:
~ ~ " i~ r!; ~~ !.~n OlZll-lt-3t""'>
~i8 g:~[l ~ i' ..Ii ~ ~ gf ~ ~~~~~,~
1-~fl ' . g: ~
"'o~ ~ IP ~~ i'~ ~ J1- t(.ltdtrl()Cbrn
H~U I iflr,: o~",::;,,~
i"" ~ h~i ~ i' ~ >,,~-<go
~~~ un ~[! ~ ~ ~ g:r ~ ~O~OZ~
i~ t"'lh lU" IJ ~ t""'tI.IZ"l:lI-j~
tlP,f r~ ~o !J ~~ ~ >SJ 0 ('l,-< 0
~! ~~ ..rifE' ~ zozt;;",,,,
C ..nh Uti II o~o>t"'",
~ ftl ~~ f . it 8 >:o;"'~o'"
"If " ~ .. 2 z~~:E~z
{Iut ~ ~lll " 000>00
f" ~ f l i ~ "'zo::,..,>>
;! .. SJ~5!~~f::
-) i',.!f[
"~ 'ii'I~ 0::....."''''0...
"'" ~~h; l1 is if..! ~=~s>~
"C !'~u] ~ ~f "", o~c:.-........
o~ ;;:n
~,~ i!n~ if- Il f! I gj~5!~~~
~;1 & t"'" 0-3 tr:l ~ I-j t""I
J;il ~~ .. >>>"'00
U t
nil ij !iJii' 0- ~z~~z.....
.. .r '" 000 o~...;
~J>
rrz
1'\..' ->. c:
"
OJ
m
Jl
2 (r.l 0
-.J->.;iJ
~~~
~ ~ ~
nim
~~~
z
(")
m
mm
~U~!i
~ ~~~
'L
o
(/J.
::r:
tI1
tI1
....,
N
o
"'rj
N
'"
c
~
~
-<
o
"
L
o
~
oeD. .
illll !
~ ~
2
o
C
~
Q
~
~ 01005'00".E 80.00'
c
~
~
~
~
C
~/.
Oc
~g~
~~~
IIJ.'lif
~o
~
"
$
~
5
"
c
~
-~
~~
31,29'
S
'" "
" .
37.66'
t'"
Q ~
'"
40.91'
C
~ ~
."
39.18'
S
~ ~ H N
~ I"
7,44'
L
'"
...,
~
~
~
~
~
~~g
~~~
~~~
c"
.r
~~
Co
E~
"-..:~
5
i
I
I
I
I
I _~(;;.,
v~
,,''I
~" 1
.")% I
~\. I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
~I
i
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~
~
~I
;!lli
~~ ~
s
~
8
c
~
~
~
~
'"
'"
...,
~
~
~
'"
,~
~
~
~
~
r.n
(")
"'
()
-
~~
II
w
""
~
~~
1;;;::
~7.
"''''
~3
~~
~~
l"=
~::
'7:'"
"''''
,"C
,"c
~~
~ ~;:tl
.....;.,.
c"
~~
'"
f;i,"~
~~~~
~L"$~>
"'Co.N1:;
~~~~~
~~9~>:
~~;~~
>tr~~~
~c>t:tl~
c.,,~>~
l.l""':1'N~!j
O>~-.I~~
~ '2~cc;i::
~ >t""'~;;;
q~~~s~
2;::~~;:S>:z
~~~~3::
:J;':I'I;:l"";;'/.'.Z
~~3~~~
c '" '" ~,~ '"
S~c....;;:~
~~~~~8
;':::::!L~'::1'"
~~~~,~~
~~~~a~
",.:ci":"'c
~~~~~~
c: '2,,~~t:=?
~t"'">....;;>!""'I
~~~~~g
~~~~~~
S;;:;~~6
l' >=;:;p;;,.,.,
C'2L""Ti" '";I
;;1o.[;l:::f;i'2
:;t;;~~:~
~S;~~~~
:::;"''''''::MI'J
~~~~~~8
>~>~'7.~
2:;:t:j~~t:E....
~il~~>;:;;
~~:::"'~P
"'(jC"l'7.,-.t::l
;~~g~~
~3c:~J""~
t""'':I'2",''el,..;'
>-~C>t"i
~~~~~?:l
~~~;;,,~~
~~~~~~
r-M:::2I-.t:=....
~~~~~~
P~@~d
~~~S8~
~~~::~E
:2...., ':1'......~ "'tI
-':I'C"Ti'";lN
CiiN(j~i2..o
>N~~M~
E~~~~S
~~':1'$1~=
""": ,.........J;..:,..,~
3S;8~s~
6~~~~~
"'I;:l:;;:lt""'~.....
;~~~~~
~~~I;:l$V2
~3S~8~
~':I'l"'"H-?-;;>-
~cc'::1i":S
..,.; :Z""":;"l'Lr
' CWt-'I;:I>
~~b~~~
~~~~$~
~~H;:;:;::n::E
""t."il:z....-.'2
~"'c>~""
~~~~~~
S~~$~~
[,,)'2~~M>
i'Jc....J:;;t"",..;;
2:~8'lJ~c
:C:I:::;:ld,,=,~
~C~S~~
:6~~~
"'.".... ~::l:L
;J?,~Si~
~a~~~
~S~6~
~~~~~
"'~~~~
1;:I=t""'~
'" 'A
r:""'l
c>
~~
0.
;;.
~
==
~
~
o
~
~
==
o
s:
~
rJJ
o
~
~
~
~
~
d
>
etl
>
~
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'.....,,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,078
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Approve the final plat for "HIGHLAND GLEN" located at 2045 Highland Avenue, which is
approximately 1f4 of a mile north of Sunset Point Road. (consent)
Summary:
* This is a plat of metes and bounds track 21/06 and 21/07.
* The property is within the city limits of Clearwater and is approximately 4.4 acres.
* The final plat will create 66 townhome lots.
* The proposed project was approved by DRC on August 4th,2005.
* The property is zoned as Medium High Density Residential (MHDR)
*A copy of the plat is available for review in the Office of Official Records & Legislative Services
Oriqinatinq: Engineering
Section Consent Agenda
Cateqory: Plat Files
Public Hearinq: No
Financial Information:
Review Approval
Glen Bahnick 04-28-2006 10:28:28
Garrv Brumback 05-04-2006 13:34:25
Michael Ouillen 04-28-2006 10:56:20
Bill Horne 05-04-2006 20:14:17
Cyndie Goudeau 05-05-2006 13:46:35
....... ... .......... ... .... ... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .........
.. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. .
. ... . . .... ..... ..... ..... ..... . ... .
..... . ......... ....... ......... ...... . ......... ...... . ......... ...... . ......... ...... . ......... ....... ......... ...... . ......... ...... . ......... ...... . ......... ..
.. . ... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
.. . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ..
.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .
. .. ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .....
. . . . . . . . . .
.. ........ .. ........ .. ....... . .. ........ .. ........ .. ........ .. ....... . .. ........ .. ........ .. ....... .
.... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... .....
.. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... .
... .. .... . .... . ..... .... . .... . .... . .... . ..... ....
. ..... . . ...... . ...... . ...... . ...... . ...... . ...... . ..... .
... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ...... .
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .
. . .... . . .... . . .... . . .... . . .... . . .... . . .... . . .... . . .... . . ... .
. ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . ....
. . ... . . ... . . ... . . ... . . ... . . ... . . ... . . ... . . ... . . ...
. .. ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. . .. ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... . .
.. . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... ...
. ........
.. .... ... .. .. ... ...... .. ... ...... .. ... . ... .. .. .... ... .. .. ... . ..... .. ... ...... .. ... . ... .. .. ... . ... .. .. .... ... ..
... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ..
.. ...... . ....... ..... . ....... ..... . ............ . ...... ...... . ...... ...... . ....... ..... . ....... ..... . ............ . ...... ...... . .....
... ...... ... ...... ... . ..... ... . ..... ... ...... ... ...... ... . ..... ... . ..... ... . ..... ... ......
..... ....... ....... ....... ....... .. ..... ....... ....... ....... ....... ..
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
... ... ..... ...... ..... ........ ... ........ ... ...... ..... ...... ..... ........ ... ........ ... ...... ..... ...... .....
.... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . ..
....... .. .... .... ... .. . .. .... ... .. .... ....... .. .... ....... .. .... ....... .. .... .... ... .. .... .... ... .. .... ....... .. .... ....... .. ....
. ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ..
. ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
. .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ..
. .. .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ....
. . .... ." ........ . .'. ........... . .'. ........... .... ... ........ .... ." ........ .... ........... . .'. ........... . ... ........... .... ." ........ .. . .
. . .. ... .. ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .........
..... . ...... . . ..... . . ..... . ...... . ...... . . ..... . . ..... . . ..... . ...... .
.. . ... ...... .. . ... .. . ... .. . ... .. . ... ...... ..... .. . .. .
.. ....... .. ...... .. ....... .. ....... .. ....... .. ....... .. ....... .. ....... .. ....... .. ....... .
.. ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ...
.. .. .. .. ...... .. .... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... ..... .. .. ..
. ...... ... .~.".. ...... .'. .J..... .... .' .'. .~..... .... .' .'. .~..... .... .' .'. .~..... ...... .'. .~..... .... .' .'. .~..... .... .. .'. .~..... .... .' .'. .~..... ...... ... .~.....
. . . . . . . . . .
. . ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .. ... ..... .. ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .. ....... .. ... ..... .. ... .....
. .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... ..
.. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .
. .......... .......... ... .... ... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .........
..... . .... . .... . .... ..... ..... . .... . .... ..... .....
.. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. .
. ... . . .... ..... ..... ..... ..... . ... .
.. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ......
.... .. . ..... ... ..... .. . ..... .. . ..... .. . ..... ... ..... .. . ..... .. . ..... .. . ..... .. . .
.. . ... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
.. . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ..
.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .
. .. ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .....
. . . . . . . . . .
.. ........ .. ........ .. ....... . .. ........ .. ........ .. ........ .. ....... . .. ........ .. ........ .. ....... .
.... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... .....
.. ........ .... .... .... .... ..... .'. .... ..... ... .... ........ .... ........ .... ..... .'. .... ........ .... ........ .... ........ .
. ..... . . ...... . ...... . ...... . ...... . ...... . ...... . ..... .
... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ....... ... ...... .
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .
. . .... . . .... . . .... . . .... . . .... . . .... . . .... . . .... . . .... . . ... .
. ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . .... ..... . ....
. . ... . . ... . . ... . . ... . . ... . . ... . . ... . . ... . . ... . . ...
. .. ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. . .. ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... . .
.. . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... .... . .. ... ...
. ........
.. .... ... .. .. ... ...... .. ... ...... .. ... . ... .. .. .... ... .. .. ... . ..... .. ... ...... .. ... . ... .. .. ... . ... .. .. .... ... ..
... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ..
.. ...... . ....... ..... . ....... ..... . ............ . ...... ...... . ...... ...... . ....... ..... . ....... ..... . ............ . ...... ...... . .....
... ...... ... ...... ... . ..... ... . ..... ... ...... ... ...... ... . ..... ... . ..... ... . ..... ... ......
..... ....... ....... ....... ....... .. ..... ....... ....... ....... ....... ..
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
... ... ..... ...... ..... ........ ... ........ ... ...... ..... ...... ..... ........ ... ........ ... ...... ..... ...... .....
.... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . ..
....... .. .... .... ... .. . .. .... ... .. .... ....... .. .... ....... .. .... ....... .. .... .... ... .. .... .... ... .. .... ....... .. .... ....... .. ....
. ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ..
... ... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
. .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ..
. .. .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... ... ....
. ........ . ........ . ........ . ........ . ........ . ........ . ........ . ........ . ........
. . ... . . . ... . . . ... . . . ... . . . ... . . . ... . . . ... . . . ... . . . ... . . . ... .
. . .. ... .. ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .........
..... . ...... . . ..... . . ..... . ...... . ...... . . ..... . . ..... . . ..... . ...... .
.. . ... ...... .. . ... .. . ... .. . ... .. . ... ...... ..... .. . .. .
.. ....... .. ...... .. ....... .. ....... .. ....... .. ....... .. ....... .. ....... .. ....... .. ....... .
.. ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ...
.. .. .. .. ...... .. .... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... ..... .. .. ..
. . ... .. .... J ..... . ... .. .... J ... .. . . .. .. .... J .. ... . ... .. .... ~ .. ... . ... .. .... J ..... . ... .. .... J ... .. . ... .. .... J ..... . . .. .. .... ~ .. ... . ... .. .... J ..... . ... .. .... J .....
. . . . . . . . . .
. . ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .. ... ..... .. ... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .. ....... .. ... ..... .. ... .....
. .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... .. . .. ... ..
.. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .
. .......... .......... ... .... ... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .........
..... . .... . .... . .... ..... ..... . .... . .... ..... .....
.. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. .
. ... . . .... ..... ..... ..... ..... . ... .
.. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ...... .. ......
.... .. . ..... ... ..... .. . ..... .. . ..... .. . ..... ... ..... .. . ..... .. . ..... .. . ..... .. . .
.. . ... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
.. . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ... . ... ... ..
.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .
. .. ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ .....
. . . . . . . . . .
.. ........ .. ........ .. ....... . .. ........ .. ........ .. ........ .. ....... . .. ........ .. ........ .. ....... .
.... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... ..... .... .....
.. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... . .. .... .
. . .... . .... . ..... .... . .... . .... . .... . ..... ....
. ...... . ...... . ...... . ...... . ...... . ...... . ..... .
... ...... . ... ....... ... ....... ..... ....... ..... ....... ..... ....... ..... ....... .
. . .... . . .... . . .... . . ... . . .... . . .... . . .... . . ... .
.... .:...:.......... .~.i. .;;;..~ ~~ ~:. .~~ :.~.~. Ii ~~ ~:,::.:,,;,~.~~~~..~~ ~ .2.~.~:~~ ~:i.'~.~:.i ~ ~.ii..~~.~:~.C.;.;~:~~~~";;,;. .;..~";;;:.: ~.~;";"~:~i: ~'~..";;,;,.~~.~:~:~'jj,:~:~i. '~:~';i..~~:.: ::.. :~:}f:L ~:....:;.:: :..: :.:::. ;:."::: ::::;:~:.:.:::~.: :\..:..;::..:..: .::::. /..: .:::;::.:..
"...........................;,;,.,.,...... .... ....:.
D
ST
o
lY
PROJECT
SITE
[7l
LJ
~
PINE
SOUVENIR
ALGONQUIN
RD
DR
€>'<~"^
RD
<(
U
CIR
WILSON
I
RDl
ELIZABETH
LA
ERIN LA
SUNSET
POINT
RD
SPRING LA
I I r:r:: r:r:: r:r::
0 0 0
THAMES LA
I I~
JOEL LA
N
W "f!.LE
;t~
5
City of Clearwater
Public Works Administration / Engineering
Highland Glen
Drawn By: S. K.
Grid # 252A
Reviewed By: T.M. Scale: N.T.S
S - T - R 2-29s-15e Date: 04/24/06
~
W
G
-<(
0-
i
I
I
I
0
z
r- ,;j
::3
0- I>: IE
[:l oJ
u ;; ~
>- ~ g
.. t:J u
Z
:::> Ii; '"
0 i:t1
u ..
'" '"
0 0
,.., ,..,
~ < ~
,.
rn 0 0
"" I>: 0::
'" "" ""
'" "" '" 0.-
- "" ,S,.. < ,.J!,..
'" ~ '"
'" 0 0
" '" g ~
~ '"
.. ~ ..
< Q 0: < 0
u ~ 51
i>: 15 u i:l n:
= ~ i>: i's
~ 0 ?: ~ i's
.. w ~
;:; '5
0 '" ~ 0 '" '"
rn u w u In
'"
'"
0.- '"
53
rn
Z-o:
"'''''
0-
..<<:
0
.-'
"'...
Z .
0>-
Z {:::~ ~ 5i
'-'0
"'0
~ rnU
....:I "'rn
0 OJ
",,-,
,--",
Cl _z
Z ..Ii:
rn
< ~<i
....:I i:t1~
::::q .....
0::'"
0 01>:
z-o:
..... ",[:l
::::q i:t1'-'
..... ,:.; i:l ~
...0 Z ~
0>- '" I
:II !
~E-< '"' ~
;;.u Q 1\ :0
[:l 51
~ n:
.. '" :0 :0 ~
rn 0 :0
-0: !;a ~ i 0
'" I~
:t: u i1i
.. < iJl
0::
0
Z
'"
:t:
..
...
0
Z
0
{:::
0::
0
0.-
...
:;;
..
i
0::
o
...
Z
o
u
...
o
'"
!;;
u
i>:
{:::
0::
'"
u
Ji
I
~
~
<
Iii
~
'"
In
v
~
Z
o
~
U
o
rn
rn
-0:
rn
0::
'"
~z
0::;
"'..
~Pl
:t:a':
0::0:
~8
~~
~ii1
,..,3
u..
~~
ZO
[:lfi:
'"'0:
QO
~~
tSg
53<
g
~
o
<
oc
"
~
<ij
..
-0:
U
i>:
{:::
0::
'"
U
Ul
i:>:
o
>-
'"
E;i
:::>
Ul
~
~~
~"~
~[f
~"
R~
~I~llli i
Ilnl ;
~
g 0
I OJ
~
8
0 0 ~
z z
ll' ll'
~ ~ ~
';1
'" '" "
[;] I!J ~ '" 0
" " " z
" " " " :l'
i
"
:0
z
~
"
~
~
"
~
~
~~
;;tj
~3:
w ri;
C;
<(
CL
j
I
I
I
0
z
e-
:5
CL
,..;
if!
<:
'"
:e
'"
"
z
<:
0:
Ii
I;-<
:;0
0
if!
0>
(\!
'"
53
'"
~
0
I;-<
13~
E::z
Z u::o
"'0
~ "'u
...:l "''''
'-' OJ
......
"...
Cl _z ~~
I;-<li:
Z '" ~ ~
< ...li <~
iI'...
...:l ~~ H
::r:: !;;iI'
'-' 00: ~~
z< '"
...... ...
::r:: ",'"
~u
1;-<",
",0
0>-
~~
).u
I;-<
'"
<:
...
~
I;-<
0:
0
Z
...
::r:
I;-<
'"
0
z
0
E::
0:
0
'"
..
- - N ~m'"~' w [S' WALL ANI) MAJNTENANCE EASfMtNT
SO"Xl' - 00 (",00 0
BLOCK 1
S. ~ ~ ~ ~ ;,; I Il ~
~ " ~
~ ~ ~ .
~
~ ~ . .
~ - . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ,- m 2 . "
;. ;. ~ ;,., ~ ;,., " ?
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 1l : ~ g ~ ~
g ~ " 8 ;;f- ME:"]
I ~ " " ..: ...J ~ ~
1--- ~
45.18' 20.00' 20.00' 2O.IXl nM' 00' 20JXY 20.00' 35.32'-
f S 89'57'01~ I TRACT 'c' ___ ~
m'''T ~ ~
~ ~ I
I
N 89'5TOlK II' 153.1' <7 N .
...,,, 2= 20,00 20.00 20.00 '",00 ,,. ~ I ~ ~
-" 01 - ~
~~I al "
N 89'57'01" II' TVii' ~
" " " " " " ~: , "
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~
, ~ ~ I Ii 89'5/01" II' 19.78' T'
. - " ~ ~ ~ ? ]I; m ]I; ~ ~ I
~ 8 ~ 1l ~ 21 ~ 13
g g " g ~I f
L > > . . . . Ii 89'57'0/" II' 79.77'
I .3 ": m ~ I
,,,;-' 13
'^~' 'o~. 2ilOO' moo' 20.00' ~ I ~ N 89'57'W II' f
~ 589'57'0/"<: !M.17' S!l9'STOIt 75.33' I, 79,75'
i ... ~ I
~ ~ I" 'gl? >D ~
I~ ~ U N89'5J'OI~w
~ S8S'"5TOI" f 7M]' I 79.75' T'
~ ~ I g~
i ~ 8 m I" 81 ~
~ I~ ~I ~ ~
~ 589'5701'( 75.3J' N 89'57'Or II' 79.74' , :z
... :13
~ g 2 i ~ ~
~ ~ I~ " J' WATER LINE EASEMENT'l, t
$89'57'0'" E 7:;'33'
~ " 18S ~ -f
" g .r W4rrn LINE E'A~T~ 1
~ I~~ ~I
... SB9'57'WE 75.33' ...
i8 "I ~ ~
~g " I
~~ N 89'5701" II' 19.71'
~ I~ Ii I ,
S 89'S7'0I~ E 75.JJ'
~i 21 ~ "
(' ~ ~I N 89'ST01~ W 79.70' f
O? I ~
i 3' 21 !ii s: 13
~I ~ N 69'57'01" W ~
~ I 79.59' NI ~ ~
J' WATER UNEEASF:Mf:NT I E '"
~ ~ I~ 81 ~ " gg ~ ~ ~
I' ~I ~r ~ ~ ~
,S S 89'S7'WF: 75.JJ' I '" N89'S7'W W ,....
- gt-' 1 ~ .
I " II d
~ 18 ~
L -~ ~---S~"'-f--'f5:3J' ~I ~
- - I~ j N89'57'O'. IV 79.67' I
- 1 ...,.J
~8 '" : ~~ 0' O? '2
S{ ~I ~
589'57'01* E 75.J.)' I <'1m ;:~I -$ 89'57'01. f.- -711.(;:r- - i!":
" I 88 ~
~ "",. ~ I ~' 5 'l
589'5701"[ ,~ :!
~
8 '" ~ :13 N 89'57'0" IV 79.64'
~ "
g I~ 81 I
589'57'01" f. 75.JJ' '" II
w " ~I I~
~ W l- I N 89SJ'or w Jg,6T
;" 8 '" III F.s1 I~
p ~ I~ '" g~
8 1 ~I ~ 8
~ <:""..,7'f11"> 36,8f 589> 01"[ 75_JJ' N 89'57'01" W 79.61"
c-22,;l1"- -<000 20.00' 20.00' 29.8J' i z
~ 81 ~ N 8frS7'Ol~W 7R6fJ'
~ ~I
I
'" " ~ ~ 1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 81 " :e 8
~ ;; ~ ;; " ~I ~ S{
2 . ~I ~d ~ . ~ " N89'57iWW 79..5f1 I
S ~ ~ - ge.J 1
'" ~
8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0' .1
2 8 8 '" I N 69"57'01* W 7!J:J8'
~ ~J_ ~
~I 0 J
"'" 6.82' 20.01)' 20.00' 21JOO' II."'" " ~I ~ ~
S89'ST01" E t 78.32 I ~
f.TNTCWMn nR"'" S89"Srorr 68.24'
>RACT'A' !RACY 'C~
LANOSCAP( EASEMENT '" 't:
-- -- ------ --r- --
" w 278.4(J"
55.IG' '000 '"00 20W M.J!)' 28.30' 20W 2(WO' 2IUX)' 20.00' 15,05' !
~ BLOC> 3 l'unu ,
,.<SEMENT ~
~ ~
~ 12 '" . il ~ " ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ . t .
I .. ,...: '-m 2 " ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~
. ? ~ il ~ ?
'" '" l'l '- I- "
" ~ ~ l'l ~ ~ l!
8 8 g g g 8 r.J
------- , . . - , . . , , -
--
z ~I V
it /" 25'1~ go:l?m ~~ ~ENT(PD? """AC ~~ :::~A PAGE: 321
~ CITY OF at RWATER A$ A .OJ~ !/
55.62' 20JI/)' 20.00' 20.()(J' 2RJO' 28.30' 20.1)0' 2IlOO' 2Iloo' 21UJO' 350(1'
IS 8916'46' [ 28 231 \ -
WTI -I OF -;
""lii?AWAcr.WT2 LOTJ
I ~
I~
~
I~
~
I~
~
I ~
I~
s
I~
I~
~
I~
~
I~
~
I)
I
I
I
I
I
~I
~I
I
I
L_
PAGf:68PINfU.ASCOUNIY. FI..ORIlM
~r;11l! "'10
U~ h~ ~
~ftr~ ieo~ "-
Illll i
~
~
~
i
~
I
i
~
~
{
~
~
I
~
~
'"
i
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
w
e
~
~
~
w
~
I- :::x: ~ .
~~~~
~::;::J
.
~
!
~
.
~
~
E
~
i
6
~ "
~ '"
1111
.~
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'.....,,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,082
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Provide guidance to staff on the configuration of the Skycrest neighborhood traffic calming
project.
Summary:
The 60% plans called for six single lane roundabouts on Cleveland Street between Lake Drive
and Aurora Avenue. Prior to the 90% plan review staff recommended that only two roundabouts
be built on Cleveland Street. The two locations would be Saturn Avenue and Corona Avenue.
One reason for this recommendation is that Cleveland Street is a minor collector carrying 7000 -
8000 vehicles per day and that volume has been steady over the last 15 years. Installing six
roundabouts in 0.9 of a mile would severely restrict its use as a collector. The other reason is
due to serious cost increases from an order of magnitude of $1.8 M to the latest cost estimate of
$2.95 M.
Originating: Engineering
Section Other items on City Manager Reports
Cateqory: Other
Public Hearinq: No
Financial Information:
~ Other
Review Approval
Michael Ouillen
05-04-2006
14:51:29
Bill Horne
05-04-2006
20:10:57
Cvndie Goudeau
05-05-2006
13:49:04
Garry Brumback
05-04-2006
15:41:06
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'.....,,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,049
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Approve the Grant Agreement with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
which provides reimbursement of project costs up to $481,100 and award a construction
contract to Rowland, Inc. of Pinellas Park, Florida, for the Del Oro Groves Reclaimed Water
System Installation and Water Main Replacement (04-0022-UT) in the amount of
$3,667,030.68, which is the lowest responsible bid received in accordance with plans and
specifications and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
Summary:
This item consists of constructing approximately32,500 LF of reclaimed water transmission
and distribution piping, 2,100 LF of water distribution, and the associated service piping by
horizontal directional drilling. This item also consists of the construction of a new reclaimed
water pump station, the East Plant Reclaimed Water Pump Station, at the City's East Advanced
Wasterwater Treatment Facility.
The construction contract timeis 300 calendar days.
Construction is expected to start in May of2006 and be complete by February of 2007.
This project is consistent with the goals, objectivesand policies set forth in the City of
Clearwater's Comprehensive Plan.
McKim & Creed, the engineering design consultantfor this project and an Engineer-of-Record
for the City of Clearwater, has provided written recommendation to award the construction
contract to Rowland, Inc.
This project is being funded in part bya grant from the Southwest Florida Water
Management District (SWFWMD). The Cooperative Funding Agreement between the city and
SWFWMD includes reimbursement of up to 50% of the cost of design, permitting and
construction costs for pumping, transmission, and distribution of reclaimed water, up to a
maximum of $3,185,000.00. This project is also being funded in part by a grant from U.s.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Grant Agreement between the City and EPA
includes reimbursement of 55% of the project costs not to exceed $481,100.00.
Resolution 04-36 was passed on December16, 2004, establishing the City's intent to
reimburse certain project costs incurred with future tax-exempt financing. The projects
identified with 2006 revenue bonds as a funding source were included in the project list
associated with Resolution 04-36.
Sufficient budget for interim financing or funding with2006 Water and Sewer Revenue bond
proceeds when issued is available in project 0378-96759, Water Main Phases 15-16-17 in the
amount of $243,656.05.
Sufficient budget and revenue are available in the Capital Improvement Program projects
0315-96739, Reclaimed Water Distribution System in the amount of $3,217,344.63 of water or
sewer revenues, 0315-96664, WPC R & R, in the amount of $206,030.00.
There is no cost to the City associatedwith the grant agreement portion of the agendaitem.
A copy of the contract is available forreview in the Office of Official Records and Legislative
Services.
Oriqinatinq: Engineering
Section Consent Agenda
Cateqory: Construction Contracts - Public Works Originating
Public Hearinq: No
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'.....,,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. , /.
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Financial Information:
~ Capital Expenditure
Bid Required? Yes
Bid Numbers: 04-0022-UT
In Current Year Budget?
Yes
Budget Adjustment:
No
Current Year Cost:
$3,667,030.68
Total Cost:
$3,667,030.68
Appropriation Code(s)
0315-96739-563800-533-00
0315-96664-563800-535-00
0378-96759-563800-533-00
Review Approval
Glen Bahnick
Tina Wilson
Garry Brumback
Michael Ouillen
Leslie Douaall-Sides
Bill Horne
George McKibben
Cyndie Goudeau
Sue Diana
Amount
$3,217,344.63
$206,030.00
$243,656.05
Comments
05-08-2006 15:23:53
05-11-2006 09:39:48
05-11-2006 17:19:16
05-10-2006 15:50:12
05-11-2006 16:23:59
05-12-2006 11:17:18
05-10-2006 16:24:08
05-11-2006 17:27:58
05-12-2006 11:26:43
'--=R:3' EI~-8
if ~
~ ~.
~~ ..
-r1-:;.. _,\,~p*
"fl..I.Rn-.;\:,C
u. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT NOTICE
RECIPIENT NAME AND ADDRESS:
Mahshid Arasteh, P.E.
Administrator
City of Clearwater
1650 N. Arcturas Avenue, Building C
Clearwater, FL 33765-' 945
Grant No. XP-97495304-2
D Assistance Agreement Offer
o Assistance Amendment
o Increase
o Time Extension
D Decrease
D Administrative
Enclosed are two copies of an Assistance Agreement offer from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
To accept this offer, please carefully review any terms and conditions, sign " and return one original copy to the
following address within three weeks2 of the mailing date on the Assistance Agreement:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
GRANTS MANAGEMENT OFFICE
61 FORSYTH STREET, SW
ATLANTA, GA 30303
ATTN: Shirley Grayer
The other original should be retained for your official records andcopiesdistribl!ted within your organization as needed.
Please note, funds will not be available for draw until we receive your countersigned acceptance of this offer.
To assist you with your post award management responsibilities. please see MReporting Forms and Guidance for
Administration of Your Assistance Agreemenf." This document contains important 'post-award reporting requirements
and instructions on how to receive payments. To view this and other EPA grant-related information, visit our Region 4
Grants Office website at:
www.epa.gov/region4/grants/
Please reference the EPA Assistance Number on all future correspondence regarding this Assistance Agreement. If you
have any questions, you may contact the Grants Specialist identified above at
(404)562-8416 or (:jrayer.shirley@epa.qov
, Must be signed by authorized representative as shown on the Assistance Agreement Offer
signature block or formally authorized delegate.
2 Failure to countersign and return within three weeks of the mailing date may result in withdrawal of this offer.
3 Please contact your Grant Specialist if you need a paper copy of this document.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4
Grants Management Office
ASSISTANCE ID NO.
.;:,+-~"-O S74,,,,1>' U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PRG I DOCID IAMEND# DATE OF AWARD
~' .f"Il 1; PROTECTION AGENCY XP - 97495304 - 2 '."/ n ..,'
~~8 TYPE OF ACTION MliAG DATE
o .,' Of Augmentation: Increase ,~( ~ · .'ht'iC
\; , ~ Grant Agreement PAYMENT METHOD: ACH# - .. ~
, .. -1l, AA.~~#' Reimbursement 40149
RECIPIENT TYPE: Send Payment Request to:
Municipal Dorothy Rayfield, Water Management Division, 404-562-9278
RECIPIENT: PAYEE:
City of Clearwater
1650 N. Arcturas Avenue, Building C 1650 N. Arcturas Avenue, Building C
Clearwater, FL 33765-1945 Clearwater, FL 33765-1945
EIN: 59-6000289
PROJECT MANAGER EPA PROJECT OFFICER EPA GRANT SPECIALIST
Todd Petrie Mario Machado Shirley Grayer
1650 N. Arcturas Avenue, Building C 61 Forsyth Street Grants Management Office
Clearwater, FL 33765-1945 Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 E-Mail: Grayer.Shirley@epamail.epa.gov
E-Mail: tpetrie@clearwater-f1.com E-Mail: Machado.Mario@epa.gov Phone: 404-562-8416
Phone: 727/562-4960, ext. 7221 Phone: 404-562-9338
PROJECT TITLE AND EXPLANATION OF CHANGES
Special Appropriation Water Infrastructure Grant
This action provides additional funding in the amount of $660,300 to the City of Clearwater for improved water infrastructure projects, These funds will support
the Del Oro Groves Reclaimed Water Expansion project located in the Crystal-Pithlachascotee Watershed, This action also extends the project/budget period
to October 10, 2008.
----
BUDGET PERIOD I PROJECT PERIOD TOTAL BUDGET PERIOD COST I TOTAL PROJECT PERIOD COST
01/01/2004 - 1 Oi1 0/2008 01/01/2004 - 10/10/2008 $3,250,546.00 $3,250,546.00
--
. --.
NOTE: The Agreement must be completed in duplicate and the Original returned to the appropriate Grants Management Office listed below,
within 3 ca!endar weeks after receipt or within any extension of time as may be granted by EPA Receipt of a written refusal or failure
to return the properly executed document within the prescribed time, may result in the withdrawal of the offer by the Agency. Any
change to ~he Agreement by the Recipient subsequent to the document being signed by the EPA Award Officiat .which the Award
Official determines to materially alter the Agreement, shall void the Agreement
.----...
OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE
.,.-.--..
The Unitpu .':;tate,., acting by and through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), hereby offers Assistance'Amendment to
the Citv of Clearwater for 55.00 % of all approved costs incurred up10 and not exceeding_
$1. 787.800-:~~-fOr the support of approved budget period effort described in application (including all application modifications)
cited in the r)roject Title and Description above, signed 08/28/2003 included herein by reference.
__w,___._.
ISSUING OFFICE (GRANTS MANAGEMENT OFFICE) AWARD APPROVAL OFFICE
ORGANIZATION 1 AODRESS ORGANIZATION / ADDRESS
-..--, U.S. EPA, Region 4
61 Forsyth Street Water Management Division
Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 61 Forsyth Street
~ Atlanta, GA 30303-8960
// TH!;..UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE US. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SIG ~/7J1A'j~~~ I TYPED NAME AND TITLE I. DATE
I' ,/ J. I. Palmer, Jr., Regional Administrator .ii;'[ ( (, "
&C-. '
L VThVs agreeffi:rlt is subject to applicable U.S. Environmental Protection Agency statutory provisions and assistance regulations. In
accepting lhis :.ward or amendment and any payments made pursuant thereto, (1) the undersigned represents that he is duly
authorized to act on behalf of the recipient organization, and (2) the recipient agrees (a) that the award is subject to the applicable
provisions of 40 CFR Chapter 1, Subchapter B and of the provisions of this agreement (and all attachments), and (b) that acceptance of
any payments (;onstitutes an agreement by the payee that the amounts, if any found by EPA to have been overpaid will be refunded or
credited in full to EPA
-
BY AND ON BEHALF OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT ORGANIZATION
SIGNA lURE I TYPED NAME AND TITLE I DATE
Mahshid Arasteh, P.E., Administrator, Public Works Dept.
XP - 97495304 - 2 Page 1
EPA Funding Information
XP- 97495304 - 2 Page 2
FUNDS FORMER AWARD THIS ACTION AMENDED TOTAL
EPA Amount This Action $ 1,127,500 $ 660,300 $ 1,787,800
EPA In.Kind Amount $0 $ $ 0
Unexpended Prior Year Balance $0 $ $0
Other Federal Funds $0 $ $0
Recipient ContribiJtion $ 922,500 $540,246 $ 1,462,746
State Contribution $0 $ $0
Local Contribution $0 $ $0
Other Contribution $0 $ $0
Allowable Project Cost $ 2,050,000 $ 1,200,546 $ 3,250,546
Assistance Program (CFDA) Statutory Authority Regulatory Authority
66.606 - Surveys - Studies - Investigations and Appropriations Act of 2002 (PL 107-73) 40 CFR PART 31
Special Purpose Grants Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2005 (PL
108-447)
Fiscal
Site Name DCN FY Approp. Budget PRC Object Site/Project Cost Obligation /
Code Organization Class Organization Deobligation
- VX61 07 06 E4C 04VOQDl 202851 E 41.83 660,300
660,300
XP - 97495304 - 2 Page 3
Approved Budget
Program Element Classification (Construction) Approved Allowable Budget Period Cost
1. Administration Expense $0
2. Preliminary Expense $0
3. Land Structure, Right Of Way $0
4. Architectural Engineering Basic Fees $0
5. Other Architectural Engineering Fees $0
6. Project Inspection Fees $0
7. Land Development $0
8. Relocation Expenses $0
9. Relocation Payments to Individuals & Bus. $0
10. Demolition and Removal $0
11. Construction and Project Improvement $3,250,546
12. Equipment $0
13. Miscellaneous $0
14. Total (Lines 1 thru 13) $3,250,546
15. Estimate Income $0
16. Net Project Amount (Line 14 minus 15) $3,250,546
17. Less: Ineligible Exclusions $0
18. Add: Contingencies $0
19. Total (Share: Recip 45.00% Fed 55.00%) $3.250.546
20. TOTAL APPROVED ASSISTANCE AMOUNT $1.787.800
XP - 97495304 - 2 Page 4
Administrative Conditions
The following Administrative Condition is added:
12. EPA PARTICIPATION
This award and the resulting ratio of funding is based on estimated costs requested in
the application. EPA participation in the final total allowable program/project costs
(outlays) shall not exceed the statutory limitation 55% of total allowable program/project
costs or the total funds awarded, whichever is lower.
PrOQrammatic Conditions
All Programmatic Conditions Remain the Same
_,,~lOO sr~}-
.;;T' ~
,,; ........ 1,
~ ... 2:
~.'~,I~'.' ,~
o ...
~ ~
"'.... .p
.~( PR01~v
UNITEDSTATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D~C. 20460
J UN 6 2005
OF'F!CE OF
WA,ER
ME1\10RANDUM
SUBJECT:,
Award of Grants and Cooperative Agreements for the Special Projects and
Programs Authorized by the Agency's FY 20.0. ,pPff. r~"p~.,,",iO~S Act
, . ,,';; )/'Y'
JatnesA. Hanlon, DIrector ,.,0/, ~l ,'~'V'""
Office of Wastewater Managelllepf(42 l
TO:
WatetManagement Division Directors
Regions I - X
FROM:
PURPOSE
This. methOt'<lrid'um provides infOl1Jlatioit IDidgtlidelines>on' howth,eEnviI'onmental
, Protection AgericyfEP A) will award andadniinistergran.ts andco6~tiyeagieements for the
special projects; (lIl(l'programs identifj~ inth.e~~~teal1(.iTribal As~istlti:1ce'Gfint$lST AG)
accourit ofth~Agency's fiscal year(FY) 2QOS Appropriations Act. '
. ." . .
, ' ,
BACKGROUN))
." -' ,
Tl1eEP ,A.se,ction of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 20o.5,(P _.'t. 108;.447); also
referred to "~' theA~ency' s FY.20o.5 ApJJropri<1(i()n~Act,includes .$399;9;2$,QQ(),~tl:1e' STAG
account for t)66'.water~ wastewater ?rid~&Iolli1(i'Y<1~~r, infr<lSttUcture:p.rpjec~~~d'forthe tong
Island SOundR~tor~tion- Program~ Alsoiriduo,edas separate lineite!Ilsin it;heSTAG.account
were, "$$0.,0.,,. OO~OOO f(j,r the United S,tate, s-M, 'exico,.U9"."rd, erPrognrman(,I$4~;9,'. "Q9,. QO,.,O",fOJ:'the Alaska
RunilandNati",eVillages Program. The Consolidated Approppation$':A:c;t:~oO? also contains
an across thebOafcl reScission of 0.80 percent except for defense, miiitaryconstrUction or
suppleIIlentalappropriations. The OJmp~rcentfe.scission applies toal} o(m~ funds included in,
the STAOaccoUnt. '
The specific requirements goveming the award of the special projects and programs are
contained in the following documents: theGonsQlidated AppropriationsAct; 20o.5~ the
Conference Report (H. Rept. No. l08~792), the House Report (H. Rept.No~ 10~674), and the
Senate Report (S. Repl No, 108-353). The specific requirements contained in these documents
have been incorporated-into this memorandum.
lnteqlet Address (URL)' hllp:/f.w.w.epa..gov
Recycled/Recyclable .PrinleQwith Vegetable Oil Based Ink$ on Recycled p"per 'f\\inimum5O"k postcon:sumer CQfIlent)
2
THREE PERCENT SET -ASIDE
The Agency's FY2001 Appropriations Act (p. L. 106-377) included a provision stating
that the Administrator may use up to three percent of the amolmt appropriated for each eanmu:k
to fund State, Corps of Engineer or contractor support for the management and oversight of the
special projects. This means that the set-aside monies cannot be used to pay for EPA staff or
travel expenses,EP A isslleda JormalpCilicy memorandum onS~pteI11bet 27, 200J, that provides
information and guidelines on how the Agency will implement the three percent set-aside
provision. 1 '
, The three percent set-'asideprovision is permanent statutory authority which means it
applies to all post-FY 2QOlspecial Appropriations A<:t projects including those listed in the
Sl'AG account of this year's Approprl.atloJ:ls Act. However, the three percent set...;aside provision
does not apply to funds appr()priated. for specific programs, such as the Long IslartdSound
R~torationPrograTIl) the United SUites-Mexico Border Program and the Alaska Itural and, Native
Villages . Program.
rROJECTS
The ConferenceRepCirtthatact6~patlied theAgency'sFY 2OQ5 AppropriationSAct
identified ~o projects fun,ded]i:o~mQI1.ies appropriated for thel1nitedStateS'-Mexico Border
PrQgfam- These two P:rPi:~~ts\vjUpe~"Y~qed alld admi~steredwitp.ij1th~,gpidelines ,and
provisions contained in th1s'll1~moranduiik
.' Attachment 1 identifi~sjl:ie.()9T~aiJl1aTks listediJ.']. the S'T.i\(i.accotmt .and the two projects.
fimdedfrom monies appropriated torQl~JJrrited States<tv.leJ{ic6:Bbrg~ 'Prpgra,nJ. Attacliti:1erif\ '
a1S9sho~s the origilia1~O'Uht;~ppr()pri:.{t~tor each project," liS well as the actual anlount
avail:,Ible for grantawardafi~r!b~f~d.1J9ti9~,clue to ~he O,.S{).percentresyissi(mandthr~ percent
set..aside provision} " ' .
, Withtheexcepti91lofEainlatk Number 133 forCplup,lPlls;Water Works.~ Columbus;
'Georgia, which willbeawardeda,ildadrninistered by the()ffi~()fW~terjn Headquarters~ tl1e
$Pedal proj ects identifiedm.Ath19hrri~t 1 will be' awarded and adrtlinistered by the Regional
Offic~. The delegati<tn ofauth~tity(12.00TN 516), issuedon~ef'tember 28,2000 (Attachment
2), ,is listed in Chapter 1 ;.Delegation Nilinbet 1-102, of EP A's Delegation Manual, ~,
. . . . -.
delegation of al.lthoritytransferred. ilieal.lthority to award'grants an:dcooperative agreemc;:titsfot
fuhdsincluded in the STAG actountto the Assistant Adn1inistrator for Water and the R((gi~na1
J This document is availableontheintemet at www_epa;go~Jo'Wrtlllfiab/owm0318.pdf.
2 States that choose toperfQTIll tbe necessary construction oversight activities for the plamring, design and
building phases of a project at their own expense may request to have the three percent set-aside funds assignedto
the respective grant recipients within their States. Headquarters will transfer the necessary funds to the Regions for
this purpose after the formal review and approval of the State'sre'l.uest.
3
Administrators. Accordingly, the Regions and Headquarters have the necessary authority,
effective the date of this memorandum, to award grants and cooperative agreements for the
special projects and programs identified in the STAG accountofthe Agency'sFY 2005
Appropriations Act.
COST -SHARE REQUIREMENT
The FY2005 Conference Report language that precedes the listing ofthe 667 STAG
~arrnarks(H. Rept.No. 108~792, at p. 1568) states1hat:
lbe conferees have provided $309,925,000 [or a tatgeted program making grants
to cortlrtiu,nities for the construction of drinking water" wastewater and stonn
water infrastructuteand for water quality protection. As in past years, these gnmts
shall be accompanied by a cost-share requirement whereby 45 percent of a
project's cost lstl1~ respollsibilityof thecommunityorentity-receiving tile grant
In those few cases ",here such cost-share requiremettposes, a particular financial
burden on the recipient community or entity; the conferees support the Agency's
use of its 16,ng~st~cling gni dance for financilll, capaQiIio/ assessments to determine
reductions or waivers from this- match tequireme~t_
With the exctWtionofthe limited instailcesinwhi6h an applicant meets the '
'critenafor a waiver, the conferees l}avteProvid~ nojn6rethatl55% of an
individual project's costs, regardless of the amouritapp.ropriatedb~loW. The
pbraseUterins'aIidsonditions" referenced in the biJ.tlarignage includes the
. 'maxiniutn55%Jed~nil share, as wellpstheiritend~;,~qipiepts,andthe specific
projectdescriptions; as Hsted below.
, The f<wort!ari&J.iageonIY allows the Agency t03pp:tp.vewt:Uversto tbe45perctmt
matching requireri1entthatarebasedon, financial capabilityjs_s'U~s. A~6idingly.ourpo1icY-foF
the projects listed in Attachn1ent 1 is that grant applicants willlJeexpectedto, pay forAS :percent
of the project costs, 11i:11ess tilere is specific 1anmagefutheContertmceReport ()r .Appropriations
Act that specifies a differentmatching requirem ent ora waiv~rto the matching requ.ireni.enri$
approved basedonfirlan.cial capability issues. '
Furthermore, in those situations wherethedescnptionin the Conference Report. "
explicitly de:fiiJ.es the scope of work of the project, the Federal share of the grant will be limited
to 55 percent of the estimated cost for completing the scope of work described, regardless of the
amount appropriated for the project, unless a waivertothematch:il1g requirement is approved
based on financial capability issues. This means, in some instances., that the grant amount will be '
, ' .
less than the amount appropriated for the project and that sorne funds will not be obligated. The
disposition of any sllch unobligated grant funds will be detennined by Congress.
4
WAIVERS TO THE MATCHING REQUIREMENT
In March 1997, EPApublished CombinedSe'rver Overflows -- Gllidancefor Fin,ancial
Capability Assessment and Schedule Development.3 This financial guidance documeiitinc1udes
a process for measuring the financial impact of current and proposed wastewater treatment
facilities and drinking water fadlities on the users of those facilities, 8lld establi$hes a procedure
for assessing financial capability. The process for assessing .finan~ial capability contained in that
document wasinitiaUy deveIopedin the 1970'sartd has been extensivelyievisedbasedon
EPA'sexperience in the construction grants, State Revolving Fund (SRF), enforcement and
water quality standards.programs. The .assessment process requires thecaJculatjonofafinancial
capability.indicator. The Agency approves waivers in those cases where the fi.Ila.l1tial capability
indicator shows that the project would result in a high financial burden on the users of the
facility,
Exceptions to the 45 percent match requirement must be approved by EPA Headquarters.
All requests for an exception should be prepared by the EP A RegionaldOffi,cesusmg infonnatiou
provided by the grant applicant, The requ~st IDtlstinclude the information coritain.edin Chapters
llIand lVofthe Financial Capability AsseSSl11eht guidance document~ The requests, including
the necessary Sllpp~:>11ing docmnentation and appropriate background material, ihouldbe
subinitted tQtbeDite~tor, Office QfWastewaterMan,agement, (Mail Code 4201M);lJSEPA,
1200 PfmnsylvaniaAvenue NW, Washington.D,C. 20460.' '
}i'EDERAL FUNDS AS A SOURCE pFMATCHING FUNDS
Federal funds from other programsmaybe:usc:xl as an or part of the matc~ Iorthe special
,projects QnlyJfthe statute authorizing those programs specifically anow~ the fuhdstob~ used as
a match for other Federal grants. Additionally,ih~otherFederarprogiamsmli~tallowtheir ,
appropriatedfilndstobe used for thepl~ing,deSign. and/or construction of water, wastewater
or groliridwatetillfrastructl.irepfujects. List:(;dbe1ow are the major-Pedeij] proitrl;ln1swhose gDuit
or loan funds can:beused toprovfdeall or partofihe match for the$jJecialprojects:
· Departmentof Agriculture, Rural Development program,
· Dep~ment of Housing and Urban Development, Community Development Block Grant-
program, and-
· Appalachian Regional Commission grants.
3 This document is available on the internet atwWw.epa.gov/owmlpdfslcsofc.pdf
4 All of the fmancial data used to calculate the financial capability indicatQT must be indexed to the same
year. The Bureatlof Labor Statistics' web site (www.bls.govlcpil) contains an ';Inflation Calculator" that ""ill
automatically perform this function.
.-..-...--.....------. .-.,-.....--...--,.-..--.-............
5
As previously stated, Federal funds may be used as all oipartcifthematch for other
Federal grant programs only if the authorizing legislation includes such authority. Since the FY
2005 Appropriations Act does notincIude such language" the special Appropriations Act grant
funds cannot be used as a sowce of matching funds for other Federal programs.
LOANS FROl\f A STATE REVOLVING FUND AS ASOURCE OF I\1ATCHING Fl]NDS
The Agency provides funding fpr two separate State Revolving Fund (sRF) loan
prpgrams, the Clean Water State Revolving Fund(CWSRF) program and the Drink;ng Water
State Revolving Fund (DWSRF)program. The Agency has taken actions that allow particular
sources offundsfrom the two SRFj:lfograms to be used as asoutce of the local match.
Specifically, the Agency issued the following two documents:
. A class deviation frqIll the regulatoryprovisio~s of40 CFR 93S.3125(b)(l). The class
4eviationl issuedAugust 16,2001, pertains lothe CWSRFprograrn.
Apolicymemoiandum designated as DWSRF 02-01. We poJjcymemorandum,61ssued
Octob~ 10, 200l,pertams 10 the DWSRF prograin. .
Thecla,ss deviation amI policy (;loctiment 1istedjlbov:~ allow St~teS:RF progniills to use
th~:rion..;Federa1 and non-State 'match share ofSRF fun(i~ to pr';"ide loans that can be used as the
roatchfor the special projects" The non.:federal funds iilC1uQerepaYJ.1lents, interest earnings @d
bond proceeds. Thenon..Sfa:teniafchshare (i.e., the overmatch) is any State coiltribution:kfthe '
SR,F above the statutorily require(120percentmatch~
The use of a loan from all S~ to provide Part~n' all.()f t1)eIilatcl1fora Specialproj~tis,a '
,$t~te S~P:rogratn agency"deci13ion~ However, the action niustbe consiSttmt with establish.W
State policy. guidelines and ptoceamesgovemingtheuseofSRFlpans.Pr,ojects that receive
SRF as$istanCemllSt alsoa,dheretoFederal CWSRF orpWSRFPtogr~ i~uireinelit~r~latit1g
, toel~gibility,Wldprioritii31ion, '
'.PM~A WARD COSTS
The Grants Administration Division (GAD) issued a policy memorandum (GPl 00-02) on,
March 30, 2000, that applies to an grants, mcludingspecial, A~Bri)priatiorts Act projects aw~dec,l
onar after Aprill, 2000. Additionally, a clarification to thepolicymemorandwn (GPI 0~02{a))
. . . .
was issued by GAD on May 3, 2000. The two memoranda revised tbeAgency's interpretafionof
a provision contained in the general grant regulations at 40 CFR g31.23(a) concemingthe
approval of pre-award costs.
5 This document is available on the internet at www.epa.gov!o....m!mablowm0324.pdL
6 This document is available on the internet at wv,,'v".epa.gov/owmlmab/owm0325.pdf.
6
In essence, the GAD memoranda state that:
"Recipients mayil1cur pre-award costs [up to J 90 calendar days prior to award provided
they include such costs in their application, the costs meet the definition ofpre~award
costs and are approved by the EPA Project Officer and EPAAward Official."
The award official can approve pre-award costs incurtedrnore than 90 calendar days prior
to grant award, inappropriate circumstances, if the pre-award costs are inconfortJia.nce
with the requirements set forth in OMB Circular A~87 and with applicable Agency
regulations, policies and guidelines.
The GAD memoranda state that the award official can approve pre-:3ward costs incurred
prior to grant awardiil. appropriate situations if the approval of the pre-award costs is consistent
with the intent of the requirements for pre-awatdcosts set forth in OMB Circular A-87 and are in
confonnance wi~h Agency regulations, policiesandguid.elines. The following two situations
meet these requirements: .
My allowable costs incurred after thestart.ofthe fiscal year for which the funds were
appropriated but beforegtant award (fQr FY 200Sprojects, this date is Octoo(!rl, 2004),
Allowable facilities planninganddesighcosts associated with the constructioI1port.kms
of the project'induded inthegrant,that-were'incurred'before the, start of the fi$calyearfor
which the funds wereappropriatecl.(for FY2005jJiojects, this date is October ,1, 2004).:
Accordingly, effective April 1,2000, the Regions have the authority ,to approve pre~a\Vardcosts
for the two situationsdescnbed above. Anyapproval,.ofcourse, is continge:nt oilt46RegioIM .
Office detennination that the pre-awardc;osts in questionafe 'in confotmance withth~applicable
Federallaw$,regulatioris and executive orders thatgovc;:rnEPA grant awardsandarea:llowable~
reasonable and a1l6cableto the project.,
The Regions shou;ldnot approve any pre-awa.rdcosts ,for special Appropriations Act
projeCts, other than those th?t involVe the two situ*1i<m,sdisc'4ssed above, Without w.r1t:ten
approval from Headquarters. The request, with sufficient supporting documentatioIl~shouldbe
subm,itted to the Director,. Office of Wastewater Management, (Mail Code 4201M),USEPA,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington; D.C. 20460. The Office ofWastewatei
Management will consult, ill appropriate circumstanges,withthe Grants Admmistration Division
and the Office of General Counsel. Ifappropriate, a deviation from 40 CFR g31.23(a) will be
processed and issued.
LA \VS, REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
A listing of the Federal Laws and Executive Orders that apply to all EPA grants,
including the projects authorized hy the Agency'sFY 2005 Appropriations Act, is contained in
7
Attachment 3. Some of the authorities only apply to grants that include construction, e.g., EO
13202 as amended by EO 13208. A more detailed description of the Federal laws, Executive
Orders, OMB Circulars and their implementing regulations is contained ,ill Module No.2 of the
EPA Assistance Project Officers Training CoUrse which is available through the Regional Grants
Management Offices.
The re~ulations at 40 CFR Part 31 apply to grants and cooperative agreements awarded to
State, local, and Indian tribal governments. The regulations at 40, CFRPart 30 apply to grants .
with ponprofit,organizations and withnon-govemmental for,ptofit~t1tities. In appropriate
circumstances, such as grants' for demonstration projects., the research and demonstration grant
, regulations at,40 CFR Part 40 can be used to supplement either 40 CPR Part 30 or Part 31.
The Agency issued a memonmdu"m7 in January 1995,.concemingthe applicability of 40
CPR Part 29 (Intergovemmenta1 Review) ;tothespecia1 projects authorized by the Agency's FY
1995 Appropria~ions Act. That memOrand1ll11 also applies to tlJ.e speCialprojects a!lthorized by
the Agency's FY 2005 Appropriations Act., .
, The Davis-Bacon Act does nqt apply to grants awardedund,~>tl1e '~llthority of the
Agency: s FY 2005 Appropriations.Actbecall~ the Act does nptinclude l<g'lguage that makes it
,apply; H9wever, ifFY2005 :fuP.d$are'usedto suppletnentfundi~g<ofaconstructioJ1 contract that
in,cluqes {Jl~an Water Act Title II requfre1}iet1ts (e.g.,f;l:>ntTactS awar(ledtmder the construction
grants ot'coastalcities progtams);theel)tire~c(jntractissi.1bjec~ topavi$.,~~con Act requirements~
iIlcludiIlgth~ {Xlftion funded with FYZOQ5 fimds;
SPECIFICEN'VIRONMENTA1.. REQUUlEMENTS
, " ,The"Na:tibnal EnvirOlWientalPolicyAct(NEPA) apdofuerJ:eleYant~pplicable statutes
and Executive Ordets, such as the En4ar(geted Species Act ~A),;~PI?lYJ~,t:h.e special projects
~uthotizedhy the Agency's FY 2005 Appropriiitions Act TheapplicableNEPA regulations are
tl;leGQlll1cil,ofEnvironmentalQtiality'tip1pl(:lJlcnting reg1l1ati()nsat 40,OFR Parts 1500~ 1508
aiidEPA'sNEPAregulationsat'40CFRPart' 6; Subparts A_p.s-
, , ODJe Agency issued a memorandulll(Attachment 4} on January 20, 1995, concerning
NEP A compliance for theSJ>ecialproj~tsauthorized by the Agency's fY. ,1995 Appropriations
Act. Tbatmemorandum also applies to the special projects authorized by the Agency's FY 2005
Apprppriations Act.
7'Diis document is available onthe internet atwww.epa.gov/o\-\'l1lImablowm0326.pdf
S EPA's regulations at 40 CFR Part 6, Subpart E, while they do not apply to these special Appropriations
Act projects, may provide additional guidance~
8
The development of information needed to determine compliance with NEPA and other
cross.cutting Federal requirements is an allowable cost that can, and should, be included :in the
scope of work of the grant ifnot performed prior to grant award. These activities can be funded
on an incremental basis, by awarding a grantthat only includes these activities, or as part of the
entire project (i,e., planning, design and construction) withthe stipulation, in the form ofa grant
condition, stating that BPA will not approve or fund any work beyond the conceptual design
point9 until the applicable requirements of such authoritieshavebeenmet. The Agency issued a
memorandum (Attachment 5) on July, 29, 2003 thatcontainsainodel grantcondiiion thatsho111d
be used in this situation.
It should be noted that NEPAand other cr9ss-cutting Federal requirements that applYlo '
the major Federal action (Le" the approval and/or funding of work beyond the conceptual design
point) cannot be delegatec1. Although EPAcan fund the grantee or state/tribal development oran
Environmental Information Docwnent (EID) or other analysis to provide supporting infotrfiatic:m,
EPA has the legal obligation to issue the NEP A documents, to sign NEPAdeterminations.andto
fulfill other cross-cutting Federal requirements before approving or paying for designaJ,'lc1for.
constrUction. '
When both EPA and another Feaeral agency are fundingthe same project, the agenCies
may negotiate an agreement for9neto be the lead agency forP~ff()Jrtring graiIt oversightanq
management activitj(~s, includingthoserelatedto NEPAandother crosso-cutting Federal , ,,'
requirements. The lead agency can be the one which'is providing the most funds for the,projeet,
{)rthe agency, that provided the' initial tWirlS lor the ptoj ect~, ,Iran envito:nmental impact sUJ.t~ent
(ElS) is required, EP A should be a co-lead or cooperating ,~gel1cYs()thatitcanadopttpeEIS "
,without recirculating it. If theproj~trequlreSanenvlronmental ~sessment (EA)~, EPAinay uSe
'the other agency's EAasabaSisfor its finding of no sigrrifican.tnnPact(FONSI), provided~PA
has independently reviewed the EAand agrees with the arialysisanp circulates the FON~J~l:l
attached EAfor the requisite 30 day contrnentperiod. ,Note thatEPA may not use a categ9.r:tcal
exclusion of another Fedetarag~ncy uriless EPA's regulations at 40 CFR Part 6 also, provid~tor
thecategorica~ exclusion.
OPERATING GUIDELINES
The authority for awarding grants forthe special projects listed in Attaclunent 1 and the
United States-'Mexico Border Program is Consolidated ApproppationsAct, 2005, (P. L. 108-
447). . The authority for awarding grants for the Alaska Rural a:hd. Native Villa~es PrograrrLis
section 303 of the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 (P. L. 104-182). The authority
for awarding grants for the Long Island Sound Restoration Program is section 119 of the Cle:m
Water Act as amended by the Long Island Sound Restoration Act (LISRA), Title IV ofthe
Estuaries and Clean Waters Act of2000 (P. L. 106-457).
9 Completion of conceptual'design is essentially the same as completion offaciliiy planning asdefi,ne,cl in
EPA's Construction Grants proLP'am.
9
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for the special
Appropriations Act projects is 66.606 "Surveys, Studies, Investigations, and Special Purpose
Grants." The Integrated Grants Management System (IGMS) code for the special projects is XP,
t1tled "W ater Infrasiructur~ Grants as authorized byEP A Appropriations." The Object Class
Code (budget and accounting information) for the special projects is 41.83. Applicants,should
use StandarclFonn 424 (Version 7/03) to apply for the grants.
Location ofProlect
To be able to report on environmental and public health benefits, the Agency has decided
to collect, and store in an appropriate database, the, geographic locationfor grant funded
infrastructurepro'jects. Accordingly, all special project gratitsauthorizedby the FY2005
Appropriations Act should include a tennandcondition stanngthat 10eational information must
be submitted. FOT:rpostprojects, the specific irtfonnation needed is the NationalPpl1utan.t
Discharge Eliminatioll System (NPDES) number(s} or the Safe DnnkingWaterIrifonnation
System (SDWIS)number(s). EPA's information technology (IT) systems will us:etheNPDES
ahd the SDWISnumb~ todeterminefuespecificgeographic p~arneters'oftheproject.For ,
those situations where l'iPDES and SDWIS identifiers are not appropriate, theJongitude and
latitude of the project should be provided.
Grants to NOi1pro:fitOr~a:tiizations
.' "-"",- .
FUnds appropriated under the STAG accountc~, if the situation watiaIit$,beusedfor
grants to nonprofit ,organiZations.' However, gfai'l:tsc;,Uin.otbeaWatded toanqn,pt.ofit
organization dassifiedbythe IntemalRevenue Service as.ag501(e)(4).organiza.tionunless that
organizationcertifiesthl:i,tit will not engage in lobbyjJlgactiyHies; even with th~ir6\Yn.funds (see
P.L. 1()4.,65-... LQbbyiIigDisclosureActof199,50} TheT<:itionale for any awardto_~no#profit
organizatlonshouId be ,clearly explained, suitablydocumerited,and included in the project file.
,Additionally; EP A Order. 5100.810, "EFAPolicy on ~ssessingCapahilitiesofN on;~9:fit
Applicants forMaIlagingAssistance Awafds,"applieSto fundiIlg:packag~s/firiicJj~g ,
reconnnendatlonssubmitt:ed to the Grants M anagement Offices .on orafterMarch 31, 2005.
Grants to Private For-Profit Entities
Funds appropriated under theST AG account may be used for grants to private fcr-profit
entities, such as a privately owned drinking water company, when the langu(l.ge contained in the
Conference Report clearly indicates that intention. The specific requirementsfor awarding a
grant to a private for-:profit entity will be addressed when there is need to award ;such a granL
10 The Order is available on the EPAintranet at hnp:/Iintranet.epa_govtogdlpolicy/Order/5700 _ 8.pdf
10
Grant Recipient
The intended recipient of the grant funds listed in Attachment 1 can, in the appropriate
circumstances, refer to anyof the following: a governmental or non~profit entity, a non-
govemmental for-profit entity, the geographical area where the project will be located, the
geographical area that will benefit from the project, or the name of the project. For example, if
the eannark designation is a county, the funds could, in certain citcumsfurices andwiih the
consent ofthe county, be awarded to a govetirmentaI entity or entities within the county. In any
such situation, the intended recipients, and the amount each is to receive, should be confirmed by
'the sponsoring congresspersonor senator.
Ownership'Reguirernents
With the exc~tion ofs'inall~ on-'siteldecentralized ,,'astewater treatment Syst~ms;which
are discussed later in this section, only wastewater and drinking water in:frastructure facilities that
are or wm be owned by the grant orsubgiantrecipient are eligible for giant funding. This m~s
that house lale:;:als (the sewer line fromtheccllection system to the house):and dtinkihg water
service lines (the line from the drinking water distribution system to the hoilse)inust be owned
by the grantee ,or subgranteein order for the~e facilities to be eligible fotgrantfupding; 'The
oWIle~hipreqtliremeQt appl;ies to Ilewcori~tfqGtion, as well, as the iehabHitationof existjp,g
facilities, and. to infiltrationiinflow correCtion associated with existing sewer lines;lltclutling
hou$e laterals. The grantee or subgrantee:can. have ownership by either fee shnple title"byihe
isswmce of anenfbtceablee?sem~t With ',right of access, or othetsuitableatithQnt)' such:;i~an '
ordinance assuring right ofatcess for such purposes asinspectio~.monitQring, buildltlg,' ...,
operation,reh~bilitation and replaceIIlent. · Since the. grant~9rsubgrantee.has ownerShip of
these facilities, the grantee or ~lllJgrant~e w:o:41o'be responsible fQnl1e9pefatio~ and
maintenance of those facilities fotthelifebfthose facilities; Additionally, the grantee or
subgranteecould not transiero:w:n.ership oftllefaciIities to any entio/WithQutwri:tten approval
from BPA.
In thos.erare situations wherea~aptpr.stibgrant isaward~ to a;g,ove.mme.ntaJ, or
nonprofit entity that does riot have theu::gal authority to oWIl or operate <l.iinkiiig w, ateI',
wastewater, or groundwater protectionilifrastructtire facilities, and thegtant incluciesthe
construction or acquisitionofinfrastrocture facilities, that entity can transfer ownership ofthe.
grant funded infrastructure facilities with the approval ofEPA.mall caSe$, the receiving entitY
must have the managerial and le~alcapabilityto assume all of the relevant responsibilities
associated with the ownership of an EPA grant funded inrrastructureJacility,including any
special conditions contained in the original grant agreement. Generally, EPA's approval~()
transfer ownership should be incorporated into the grant award document In the fonn of a special
term and condition. .
11
On.,Site Systems
For small, privately"'"owned, on-site/decentralized wastewat~r treatment systems, such as
a septic system, an eligible applicant may apply for a grant to build or renovate these pIivat~ly-
owned systems. In such cases the applicant must:
. demonstrate that the total cost and environmental impact of building the decentraliZed
system will be less than the cost of a .conventional system,.
. certifY that ()wnership by a public entity ora suitablenon...;profitorganization (such as a
home owners' ~sociation or cooperative) is not feasible and list the reasons,
. certify th.at the treatment facilities will qe properly operated and maintained. for the life of
the fa,cilities, and
. provide assurance of access to the systems at all reasonable times forsuchpulpOses as
inspecti(m, mOnitoring, building, operatioh~ rel1abilitationandreplaceIJiemt. "
,Jhtennunicipal ProiectsandService A~eements
, ,
Although a special Apptopriations Act granfriiayheawarded.toone entity; the successful
,()perations of the grant funded project may depenrl on the supporlandcogperation of other
, . '"", ",. ,
<;ritities, Dll.lWcipalities,()r1.1~ilitydistricts. This, isespeciallyevtdeht wheriorie .~l1tityispr()~dmg
was!.ewater trea~ent serViCes or supplyingdrinkipg water<to another entity., Accordin~y:,for
projects involving interactions between two ormol'eentities,the applicant should proViCle '
~surances that the grant funded,proj ect will function as ijjtended f'oi"lt$'expected life. Ad~q*ate
3.sSllrallCe may be mettbroughthecreation of special s~rvicedistticts~ ieglbnaii.zatibnofs.ystems;
orintermunicipal serviceagr~ents.
Specialsernce districts and regionalizatlono:f systems are considered to be obligations in
'perpetuity to serve the custome~of the newly cr~tedau1:h(.)rityand automatically meet. the,
eXpected lifetime requirements. The iritennuniCipal serviceagrecinentorcoritract is a legal '
document for cooperative ventures betweense,parate entities.botl1ofwhicb wish tocoritinue
functioning with a larged~greeofindependentcontrol intheirre~ectiveserviceareas;Such
agreements will need to extend for a minimum llu11).ber of Years for anEPAfllnd~d projecHope
considered Viable. For the purposes of special Appropriations Act projects, EP AWlll accept the
following contract lifetimes as meeting the minimum standardH:
1 J Theanlicipated useful lifeoflhe facility corilponentsis based on the low end of the assumed service life
for ilelns in EPA's Construction Grants Program and past experience with the award and administration of special
Appropriations Act projects. '
12
ITEM
LIFE (\iears)
.
Land
Permanent
.
WastewaterAVater Convevance Structures: collection systems,
pipes, interceptors, force mains, tunnels, distribution lines, etc. 40
Other Structures: plant buildings, concrete tankage, basins,
lift statfon and pump station structures, inlet structures, etc. 30
Wastewater and Drinking \VaterProcess Equipment 15
.
Auxiliary Equipment
10,
A shorter time frame maybe accepted if suitably justified and approved by EPA.
Non-CcirtstructionCosts
The scope ,of work Qfa grant may include planning, design:IDd adiIlinistrativ.e activities,
aridtliecost orland. Land need nQtbe,an "integral part of the treatrnehtptoc~ss"a$in. the Clean
Water Act Title TItonstrnttiongrantiptograItLHowever,all elements included withirithe scope
ofwqrkof"thegrant mustconfonrt to theiJ;:eqriirements of 40 CFR Parls300r 31. 'This means, if
plann:ir:i.g; desigfi~dadmimstrativeacti\i;itii;:;sa,re included in the grant, thepfocureiri~tofthose
serVic~sandthecontracts mustcofuply, With the applicable sections ofParr.s30 or31.Jfland is
incluger;1,tb.e:rewi,ll De a Feqeral inter~tjIlth~land regardless ofwl1enitVi~$purchfl$~d .andtl1e
putcnasifriiust be {:must have been) ,ill a<:cordaIi.~eWith theapp lica,ble sec~opsQfPa:ttsjO or 3 I
and the Uni foltn,Relocation Assi~ance<and'RealPtoperty AcquisitloJireglila:Uons for Federal
an4Federally assisted Programs at:49 CFRPar.t24.
Refinancing
FUlldsapptopriated fOrthesp'eohilptQjects may not be awarded isolely t()fepay.loans
receivedrromaState RevoivingFiIiidot other indebtedness unless there are explicitmstructions
't6 <losp in the Appropriations Act oraccompmlying reports, Or, the facts of the case are such that,
thisistheon1ywaytoawardthe,fi.mdsih~t were ~ppropriated fortheproject_Anyrequest to use
special Appropriations Act grantfimds to repay a loan, in whole or in part, must be approved, in
writing. by ERA Headquarters. The request, with sufficient supporting documentation, should be
submitted to the Director, Office of Waste:water Management, (Mail Coo64201M), USER A,
1200 Pen:i1sylvania Avenue NW, Washington, D;C. 20460.
13
Definitions
In the context of determining that the scope of work of the grant is in conformance with
the project description contained in Attachment 1, the word "water" can be considered to mean:
drinking water, wastewater, storm water or combined sewer overflow. Furthennore, the words
"and" & "or" as used in the project description are interchangeable. Additionally, the phrases
"sewer project," "sewer improvements;>> "sewer upgrade," "sewer development," "sewer
expansion," "sewer system," "plaptproject," "plant llpgrade,"or<$plant expansion" are,
considered broadeno'ugh to include all aspects of the upgrade, expansion and development ~fa
colJlplete wastewater treatment.system as defmed at 40 CFRg35.2005(12). Comparable phrases
concerning tbeproject descriptions for drinking waterfaciHties shQuld be similarly interpreted.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESULTS UNDER EP A ASSISTANCE AGREEMENTS
lntrocluction
EPA Order 5700.712;,"EnvltorunentaIResults Under Assistance, Agreernents," applies to
aU non-competitive funding packages/fimding recommendationsStibinitt~ to the Gratits , '
Man~lgement Offices after January 1,20'05. The Ordertequires:EPA Pt()gram Offices to: l)liIIl<
prbp9sed;,~sistanceagreementst() the Agency' s Strate.~c PlanfGoverililierit Perfonnanceaild
. ResultS Act(GPRA} architectufe;;2)eI).spre that outp~~sand. tl>tlJ,emax"iptutn extent practic,~ble~
O\ltcomesare, aflpropna,tely ,addressed ,in' assistance agteementworkplaris13 and funding
teCbinrlieIldatidns; and 3}enSl}Te t'hat progress inachievinga~eed"upon6utputsand outcomes is
adequately addressed in recipie~tpr(>gresS reportsancltJelyanqedTl1onit6,ring, activiti es.
o' . d , .
'TheStrategicP]anfGPRAAIchifecture
EPA's 2003Sttategk:Plan14 se,tsout five longHermgoalstbrQuglt 2008. Each of these,
five goals iSsUppoited by a series of objectives and sub:'objecfivesthat ioentify,' as predselyas
possible~ what environmentaloutcomesor resultstheEPAse-eksJoachieye within a ddinedfirile
frameusingresoPTces expectedtobe available. The objectives andsuo-:objectives established in
EPA'sStrategic Plan are part oftb.e uGJ>RAarchitectu.re~'that lSl.lsed to measure the EPA ~s
progressm meetmg its strategic goals.
12 The Order is Olvailable on the EPA futranet at http://intranetepa.gov/ogdlpolicy/Order/5700.7,pdf
11 Throughout this section, the term "work plan" is used for cOIlvenience. For construction projects;
outputs/outcomes are normally included in a Facility Plan, Preliminary Engineering Report, or an Environmental
InformationDocument. In many cases these documents may not exist at the time ofgrant application, In those
situations the development of the documents will be included in the scope ofwor.k of the assistance agreement.
14 The Strategic Plan is available on the internet at www.epa.govfocfo!plan/2003sp.pdf
14
Program offices must include in the funding package for a proposed assistance agreement
a description of how the project :(its within the EP A's Strategic Plan!GPRA architecture. In
developing the aforementioned descriptions, a project officer must list all applicable EPA
strategic goals and objectives and, where available, sub-objectives. The project officer rollst
ensure that the Program Results Code(s) (pR<;s) listed on the corrunitmentI1otice is consistent
with the selected strategic,goals, objectives and sub-objectives. The Strategic PlanlProgram
Results Code Crosswalk, which summarizes the strategic goals, objectives, sub-objectivesJ and
the PRCs fOf everyEpA assistanceagreementprogtam,is attacbed to Appendix A piEP A Order
5700.7.
Outputs and Outcomes
The tenn "outPllt" mecmsaTI envlTbnmentalactivity, effort, and/or a.ssociated work
products related to an environmentalgoa.lot pbjectiye, tha,t will be producecior provided over a
period of time or byaspe~ifi.ed date. OutputslIla)' beQllantitative or qualitative but I:I1ust be
measurable during an assistaIicceagreementfundingperiod. Outputs reflect theprbd~ctsaIid
services provided by the recipient, but do not, by ,themselves; measure theprogr<Ul1I11aticor,
environmental results drab assistanceagreern~t. E~aTI1ples of en it puts for special
Appropriations Actptojects,are:
· Numb,er of additional h()Jt1es (()t~uival~!lt~)provicled adequatew~te~~teI'ti~atment '
(canbecentralizedotdecentrtdizeCiJ;' ' , '
, '
Number ofadditio'nal hO:rhes(or'eq\liyal~rits)ptoyidedsafe diiIlld~gwa:t~i'.
.
, '
, '
, '
:PercentitnprQveroerti in .infrqstructurerellqbilityand mainten8,I1Ce{e.,g., ~olle~tionc:u1d
,distributi on:s)'stetp:impl:9yemen,ts, pllli:tp 'r~lacenient, ill1pFOYenif;rits,atWast~w~ter
tieatnieIltQT,'drinld:ngwafet fac.Hitiespl9nt, u.pgrnde, expansion, integritY, reduction of
infiltrationliiiflow,etc. )~
CapaCitY, (MGD)ofilewly' cons'tIucteo.wastewater treatment plafit~,
.
.
For expansiOn of all eXis{ipg waStewater treatment plant, increase inc~paCity(MGP)of
plant:
.
For upgrade of an existing WaStewatertreatn1entplant; new leveloftreatfuertfprovided.
.
Storage (MG) provided by newlyconstrllcted drinking water tank.
.
Storage (MG) provided by new reservoirs.
.
Population served by new construction.
15
· Feet of sewer lines replaced.
Feet of sewer Jines extended.,
· Feet of water lines replaced.
Feet of water lines extended.
· Wet weather improvement:
Estimated numbeTQfcombim:dseweroverflows(CSQs)reduced.
Estimated arrioimt(e.g,~minion gallons per year) Ciffultrea.ted wastewater not
discharged as a result ofCSO improvements;
Number of sai1itarysew,~roverflows reduced,
Stow waterimprovemetits;
",;. Environmental restoration,i.Inproverrie:nts.
'.:Enha;llced securityirnpr:ovements lowastewa.ter .or' drinking water facilities.
"T,lie-term"outcome" m-e~"..tb.er~stllt,effector<:;onse_qu~n~eJAat,Wil,1 occur from c~]).g
()utan~Ilvlrorunental programora~tivity tl1at is related tOa1ienyifonm.~talor programmatic,
'goal,o(objecfive.,Outcom~s maybejefiyironmentaI, behavi()taI?hea.Ith~J~lated or prograwmatic
'i;DIjatl#~.jnll~t be qua.ntitl:ltiye.<in.cl1ll~Y hotnecessarjly be3.(::l1iev~bJ~V-litl:rin an assistatlce
. agreement funding period. ,There_3I;etWoma.j"or typesofoutcofi:1e5 ..-errdQutcomes and
:i1jte~ ~~<:liate()ut-comes.End orit~()Ii1~~:~tethe (1es:iredendoru,lt.,iIn~~;r~:$#1tsofaprojector
'..'pr9gf~~ T);ley.tepresent resu,lts:that'left(;lt~envirpt$t;:ntgVpubA~:I1ealllii#lpr9Vemd:1t.
:triiermediate outcomes ateoutcom-es thalateexpectedtole~d to. end otitc(jines butare not
'th~s~ly~ '~ends." Giventhafili.i~md:o).1tcomesofan.aSsist@ceagreerilentmay notoccu,fl,llltil ' '
"alter the assistance agreementfup;~ipgj)eriod.inte@edia~e<lgtCQwesteaJiz~.during the :fi.mti.41g
:p~riodareatLirnportant way to lfieasttteprQgressin acbievmg.endoutcQmes,
.. . '. - ."
~iQgramoffices must 'inc1uqe in the' funding paclcageforapJ:()pos~assistance a~elTIent
'alJ.~W$J.ce that the progtatll offi~e h.astevieWed, orwinireYi~w.tlie~sista,nceagreemen! Work,
'plan~Sandthat the work plan includes, on.viU indude, well..definoo'outputsand. to thertiaXirntirn
ex.t~tpracticable, well.;.defined QutcQmes.
The CVlSRF program is in the process of finalizinga''BenefitsAssessment'' format for
individual projects, see Artachment6" This format can be used to measure "outcomeS"for the
~ial Appropriations Act projects. Accordingly. the Regions caniI1elude the information
contained in Items 1,2. 3, and 4 of Attachment 6 as ameans foiineasuring and reporting
15
See Footnote ] 3. s!Jpra.
16
outcomes.J6 The measurement of environmental outputs and outcomes is in the developmental
stages. The Regions will pe informed of changes as they occur.
Examples of Acceptable Descriptions In Assistance Agreement Funding Packages
The folloWiIigllfe examples of acceptable .descriptions in assistance agreement furiding
packages:
Example 1:
'This projedsupportsGoa12(Cle.qn and Saj&.Water), Objective 2.2 (protect Water Qualiry).
Subobjective 2:2.1 (.fptprove Water Quality ona Watershed lJasis). The overcJilgoaJofthe
project is toprovi'deadequate wastewater treatmentse.rYicesforthose areas of the c;o1?imunity
with failiJlg on.csite. sePtic systems, The Project Results Code (PRe) assignedto.thefundingfor
this projecU$.202lJ5)'A which is consistent-With thesJra{egic goallobjective!subJective.The .
(name oj Di.vision/Jitimch;' in(R.egi()n~ has rei?it4vedtfte work plann for thisptojeCr(1lld
, determinedtha{itpontains well-:definedoutpulS, and to the maximum exte;UpractZcable, wf!ii
defined ouic()mli$.' ' .
:example 2:
This ptojet:ts~pjipt1~f!joal.2(CI(!ah and Sr.ife-JKa.ter), Ob]f!ftive2. J (ProtectHWl1{ln Heq;lth)~,
Subobjedive.2.LtllY4ter Safe to Drink}. TheoverailBoaloftheprdject is to,lliWef the i:ilpouiz!
of arsenic iiz'Jk~c1Hli}l;:lh~lY(.lt,ertomeet re-vised,pernli,freql;tiremgnts; The projecfRe$ults(ipde
(PR C) assitne}M<ith~iimdlngfQr thisptojeci,is20fB51ewhiliJr i$ consisterl(wthfhe'$ttat~kiq.
goal/objectiv.dsulJjcCifjve.The(il411JeofJ)ivisi(JlJ/lifa;Jch)in(Region-1 Wilr'iliview',th[!work
plan/8 forthiipr,iJJ~~t'9)Jdwilldit{ermineth<ttit contains-we{i-df1itied otttputs,cmdiothe, . ' '.'.
maximum extent j{ft1t;tiCtilJIe; w~zr-defined6l;tti;oitl~sWbelJt~~~measures are4eyeloped.t:h~!3
'measures wiltbe dcyifl9ped'duringthe .planning portlon;6fthe,@:'attt. Additionaliy.Ef:4 witl.,tbt
fUluiany d~1~{)r€q~~tn.Jcti{)nWork':unnttheS~mecrSYr~'flrC4ccepted. . ' ' , " .,'.
. ,... ",.
. .... ..
EPA Reviewo:f'Rec~pieI1tPerfonnance Reports
EP A OidetS'jQO. 7 estab]isheS.tequitem~tSforprog:{'~nQfficerevieWof cons:ti:uctipp
and non-cppstru,ction:interimand fmalrecipientperrorm,ancereports' for progreSs in achieving
outputs ~dQ~~t()niescQnt(tinedjn ass.istance agieementworkplans. Under 40 CFRParts30and
16 G.PRA rep6ttingintl1e SAAP database system is alsorequited for the NEPAcomplknceprogramand
project offiters!N:f:PA.Cootdinatbrs will need to report oUt openvUobmtntaloutcomes for tbe NEPAprogram in
addition to tbe reporting needed for grants.
17 ' ~
, See Footnote 13, supra.
18 See Footnote 1.3, supra.
17
31, EP A may require recipients to submitperfortnance/progress reports as frequently as quarterly
but no less frequently than annually. These regulations also require recipients to provide the
EP A with an acceptable final perfonnance report at the end of a project.
. . ..
Thereview of recipient perfonnancereportsis largely the responsibility of the EP A
ptojectofficer. The project officer must review interim 19 andfmal20 perfonnance reports to
detenninewhether they adequately address the achievement of agreed-uponoutputsloutcomes,
includingproYiding a satisfactory explanation forinsufficient progress or a failure to meet
plqrU1ed~Cct>Inplishments. This teviewITlustbe documented in the officialproject file. If a
reportdoesnot adequately address the achievement of outputs/outcoBles, the project officer
should seek further explanation from theJ'ecipient and require appropriat~corrective action.
Addition.allY,ahY mitigatio~ measures that should he irnplernentedon the project as determined
throughthe NEPA analysis should be reviewed as part' oftheperformancereports.
A~vflrd officials must use the following-special conditions in all assistance agreements
requiring performance reports to provide a.comparison ofactualaccoITlplishplents to ~greed-
uponol.ltputsloutcomes: '
RequiredSpecia/ coilditiollS lot a~sistancea~eements to Stale and;local,~overnments:
l#!ir;cqtdil'flce with 40 CF:p.>f31A()~tJzenkipient agreestdsubmitpt3f[ormance reports that
indud~briefitiformatjoll on each pfthef()llowin~ areas: l)a coml!ar1srJnof actual
accomplfshments to the oU1pldsloy,tcomesestablished in the assista!lCe4gr~ement work pla,i
fqrt~ep~riod; 2) the reasonslots.lippatei/establishedoutplIt$)dutcQmeswere not met; and
3)additidnal pertinent infOrinationf inclr:uHng, whenappropriat.e;analysiS-andinformation of. .'
cosio.vw:tu.ns or high unit.costs, '",., " , " ,
, .
1,rtl.c:<;ordahce with 40 CFRJ3 L40(d)~ theiecipient agre~toin.formEPAas$oonas
prd,bleffz$, delays or advetseco1Jditions pecome knOW1twhichwiiriiiateriali.yiilZpa~r the
',abiHi:j1 tp7fleei the outputsldutcP1f1esspecifie.d>inthe assistafzc~tigree1nentWorkplan.
Requ}re.dspecial conditions for assistance ar!Teementsto institutions ()fhir:hereducation and
, dtheriloh-vrofit or~allizati()izs~"
In ClcCQrdance with 40CFR s30.SJ(d),rne recipienttigreesto inc1udeb~perfonnance reports
submitted under this agreement btiefiizfomiation on eacH of the following arecis~' 1) a
19 For construction projects, on-site technical inspections and certified percentage of construction data meet
the interim reporting requirements, see 40 CFR.931.40(c).
20 For construction projects, the fmal inspection report or other finnlperformance report should include a
comparison of the actual outcomes/outputs with those incorporated into the assistance agreement.
18
comparison oj actual accomplishit(ents to the outputs/outcomes specified in the assistal}ce
agreement workplall 2) reasons whyanticipated outputs/outcomes were,llot met; and 3)
other pertinent injormation; including, when appropriate, analysis andinfonnation of cost
overruns Of high unit costs;
In accordance with 40 CFRJ30.51(j). the recipient agrees that iiwillnotify EPA oj
problems, delays or adverse cOi'Jdit(OflS which materially irnpairthe ability to meet the
, outputs/outcomes specified in the assistance agreement workplan.
Advanced Monitoring.
EJ;>AOrder 5700.1, directsp:rogrnm offices, whencond.ucting on~sitc:: reviews ,or.desk
review$l1llderEP A Order 57QO,6 Al;po}icy on Complfance, Review and Monitoring, toji1clud~
an assessment of the recipient's progress in achieving the outputs a.nd olItcomessetforth in the
assista:nce agreement work plan?] 'If the assessment revealssignificanLprohlems in meeting
agreed~upbi1 outputs/outcomes, the project officer must tequirethet~ipi~t tp develop'9nd '
hnplement an appropriate correctiveactloi1 plan. The re~ultsofthea.ssessIIl(;nt mUst be ,
documented in the Grantee Compliance Database in a Jormatdetemiineclby the Director,of1he
OrantsAdrninistratio:nPi vjsi9n~ '
NE)W1NtrIATIVE
This section destribesthe Ag~~>,~sj:>lan for llnJ.>IeIl1e:Dting()n~tiewinitiativ~.
Conforinancewith Cotnbined Sewer OV~t.flow Control Policy
, EPA's COnibined SewerOvtilllow Control (CSO)PoHcf2is a national framewoikfor
cohtrol of CSOs througllthe,N~t:i()fuj:1 Pblllltant DischargeElimjnaJiOn.$ys~em (NPDES). ,'the
poHqy was sigi1~by,the J\qinirii~~tQt QIJ, April 11, 1994,~dWa.~iA~Qrporate(Hrito la~1iy'the
We~W~ther W aterQuality Act 6f20QO,\vhicb was enacted CiSparf()ttheConsolidated,
u,1\PprQpri~tio-ns ActfQrFY40QIW~L, 1()6"'5~4). The-purpose oftheCSQp.olicyis toco?tdinate
thepIatirtii1g, selection, desigtiand i~pieI:l1en:tationofCSO management practices and c6i.ltI'o]stQ
implement the. requirements of the Clean Water Act (CWA). '
One of the elements of the C$Opolicy is the developI1le:nt<;>faJong-term controlplari. J.f
along-tenn control plan has 'been reviewed and approved by the NPDES pennitting ag~cy~theJi.
any tso work or activities ,inCluded ,fu the. scope of work ofa special Approprlations Act PfOject
should be in conformaI1cewiththatphll1. Ifa long",tenncontrol plaIll1asnotbeen approved by
the pe~ittingagency, then any specialAppropriations Act projecnh~tincludes funding forGSO
21 See Footnote 13, Supra.
22 The CSO policy is available on,the internet at www.epa.gov/npdes/cso.
19
work or activities should address the development, including timing, ofa long tenn CSO control
plan.
PROJECT SPECIFIC GIDDELINES
The FY 2005 Appropriations Act and Conference Report contain a number of provisions
related to individual projects. The following discussion describes the Agency's interpr:etation
and planned implementation of these provisions.
Guam and Virgin Islands Proiects,
Eanna'rk Number 146 and EannarkNumbet 411 in the Agency's FY 2005 Appropriations
Act provide, respectively/'$250,000 to the Guam Waterworks Authority forwater and '
wastewateriIlfrastructure irnprovementsintheTemtory ofGtiam," and "$250,000 toQ1e
Government of the Virgin Islands for wastewaterfufrastructure :ii:nprovements,in St. Croix~
Virgin Islands;"
The QmniblisTerritories Act of 1977 (p. L. 9S.,.134) authorizes Departments alld
, Agencies to award grants to Insular Tercitories,such as Guarnartd.the Virgin Islands, witQoufa
matc1.ljngrequir~Inent. ..:ai~tQrically, EPA hasexercjse<itlris cliscietion~ Cluthority(llj(l~wa:tded '
fund~to the Il1su1ar Territories without any matchii.1grequin::lll~t.The Agency mtenclit6
continuethls_practice. Accordingly, the FY 2()()sSpecial A:.pprQprialions Act.Pl"Qjects~9r;Gu,am
and the VirgfnIslands can be-awarded without'~,m~ltching re.qu,i(~D1ent. Howey~r~,#le'FY 2005
Appropriati()Ils Act also states that thegr'ant' funqs fotGpamm~stbeused "fotwater'ari.<i
waste\vater infrastructure improvements in the Territory ~ofGuan1./'and the grarltfuna:s :for the
Virgin IslandSffiQstbeused"for wastewaterinfi"~tructur~ :irnptovementsin St: C!oix., Virgin
Isl~ds." ACyoidingly, sepa,nitegrants' 11111st he~waI:4~t() CiuaIllandtheVirginlslanclS:
specifi~any for these activities. , '
PROGRAl\1S,PECIFIC GUIDELI~S
, '
The, Agency's FY' 2005 AppropriationsAct andaccompanYil1g reportsci>ilt*ig..3!;1Urnber
ofrequitements for the United States-Mexico Bor<lefI?rograttl, the AlaskaRuralandoNative
Villages Program, and the Long Island Sound Restoration Program. Thissectiondescnbesthe
Agency's interpretation and planned implementatj0J19fthosere:quirements.
United States"'MexicoBorder Program
The Agency's FY 2005 Appropriations Act provides $49;600,000, aftenescission, for:
. . . architectural, engineering, planning, design, construction and related activities
in connection with the c~)rtstruction of high priority water and wastewater facilities
in the area ofthe United States-Mexico Border, afterconsuJtationwith the '
appropriate border commission.
20
The scope of work for grants awarded for the United States-Mexico Border Program must
conform with the language contained in the Appropriations Act and the grant file shouldinc1ude
documentation that describes the results of the discussions and consultations with the appropriate
border commissions. In large part, BFA provides grant funding to the Border Enviromnental
Cooperation Commi~sion (BECC) for the project development assistance program (PDAPland
the North Ame.rican Development Bank (NADBank) for the Border Envrrorunental Infrastructure
Fund (BEIF);in these cases, the sub grants from BECC and NADBank should contain similar
documentation.
The Conference Report identifies two projects that are to befunded,byinonies provided
for the United States-Mexico Border Program: "$5,000,000 is forcontinuatiop of the EI Paso,
Texas desalination and water supply pt6Jec~and $2,000,000 is for tbe BrownsviHe, TexaSw~ter
SUpply project" The Bro\Vnsvi11e and ElPasoprojects will be awarded:bytbe EPARegion VI
Office and administered within the provisions, inc1udingthe 45 percent matcliingrequtrement,
l;:ontained in thi~ Inemorandum.
,EPA coSt participation onprojectstunded from the Uriited States"M~xictl Border ,
appropriation item (wit~ the ~){qg>tion of the two projects identifiedab()ve)willbedecidedoua
pro] ect:-by-proj ectbasis. TheEPA (;ostsharewill depend on,a nU1Tlber()ffacto:r~which hav~ '
been separately.defmed within thecon.teXct oflhe United States:-Mexico BQrde;rPtogr8m.
, ,On May 12~ 1997,the:Agencyissu.edamemorandum23 conceIiiirtg:~'Progr:amRequir~~ts .
, . for Mexican Border Area Projects Funded under the Authority of this Agericy'sFY 1995~ 1996
.apd 1997 Appropriations'.Ads." Tl:1attrleril6r~dum also applies to tlteUriitedStates~Me~ico
. Border Aieaprqjects funded under the.authorityofthe Agen'cy;s FY200SAPpropriafion$ Act.
Alaska Rural and Native Villages Program
TheAgency'sFY 2005 Approprial~9ns Act provid.es$44,64QJ)()O. a.ft~r rescissi()p,
, for grants to the State: of AlaSka tQaddress drinking water and wastewater'
infrastruchlreneeds of rural and Alaska Native Vi11ag~s: Prqvide.d.11iat,' ()fthes~
funds (l)the Stat~ ofAlaska,shaHpr9vide a match o:f25percei1t, (2) no motet!1an5
percent()! the funds may be used lot administrative andovemeadexpenses, and (3)
Dot later than October 1 ,2Q05theStaJe of Alaska shall mak:eawardscorisist~t with
the state wide priQrity list ~tabUshed in 2004 for all water, .sewet~ waste disposal,
and similar projects camedout by the State of Alaska that are "fundedundetsectioD
221 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C 1301}ortheConsolidated
Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S,C.1921 et. seq,) which shall allocate not
less than 25 percent of the funds provided for projects in regional huh communities.
23 This document is available on the internet at \vww.epa.govJowm/mabJowm0327.pdf.
21
Item (1) above means thatlhe State of Alaska must provide $14,880,000 as its share for the
program. Items (2) and (3) above are selfexplanatory and do not require any further explanation.
Additionally, the Alaska Rural and Native Villages Programfunds may be used to pay for
activities specified in the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1996, (P. L. 104-182, Section 303),
specifically: "training, technical assistance, and educational programs relating to the operation
and management of sanitation services in rural and Native villages." These include the Remote
Maintenance Worker (RMW) anci the Rural Utility Business Advisory CRUBA) programs.
Prior to awarding any grants under the, Alaska Rural and NatiyeVillages Program, Region
10 shall develop a "Plan of Action" (plan) in consultation \viththe Office ofWastewatet
Management; The Plan shall include steps to remedy the fiscal and program management
defici~l1cies outlined in theEP A Inspector General's Audit of September 21, 2004 (Report No.
20Q4-P-00079Y4 <iJ,ldthe OMB Program AsseSSment and RatingToo~ (PART) reviewls ofthe
program.
Long lsland Sound Restoration Program
Earmark Number 293 in the STAG account of the Ag~llcts FY 2005 ApPfopriatiop.shct
provides "$4,000,,000 fOf wa,terquality infrliStiuctuTe iPlproyementS for Long Island Sound, New
York." The Agency intends to administer thisearmaikusing the Long Island Sound. Program .
Guidelmes issued on May 6, 200,2. These guidelines entitled~'Award of InfrastnIcture Gtan.ts to
Implenient the Long Island 'Sound Comprehei1siveCo.nSerVationi.1n.d Management Plart" were
de~eloped to implement the LbngIsland Sound RestorationA~t (LISRA),' Title IV of the ',"
Estuaries and Clean WatersActof2000(p, ,L. 10,6-457); Thefilpds,after the reductiQn,.M~.to
the,O;80 percent, rescissiori"iu1dt1:rret'i percent set'-a,sicieprovisioll, Will he awardeda:s~ts t(j'the
$tc;ltesof New Yo.rk and Connecticut in accordance with allocatlon,ptoceduresestablishe(fpythe
, Lon$ Island Sound Management Conference. ,The Long Island $Qund Ptogranlhas a,s~~te "
Catalog of Federal D()me~ticAssistance(CFDA) J1umher whichis'66.437. .
GRANTS MANAGEMENT
Grants awardedundet the authority of an Appropriations Act are subject to aSsistance' '
agreement regulations, OMB cost principles and Agency policies. The grants must be awarded
and managed as any other assistanceagreemerit '
The Grants Administration Divi~ion (GAD) has develope~ Grants Policy Issuances (GPls)
to assist project officers and program offices in fulfilling and underStanding their responsibilities.
Two GPIs tbat are directly related to the award and management of Special Appropriations Act
24 This document is available on the internet ati,vww.epa.gov/oiglreportsl2004120040921-2004-P-
0OO29.pdf
25 This document is available on the internet at \vww.whitehouse.govlomblbudget!fy2006/pmalepa.pdf
22
projects are GPI-03-0J -Attachment VI "Policyand Procedures for Funding Assistance
Agreements" and GPI-00-05 "Cost Revie\v Guidan'ce."26
On November 14,2003, GAD disse'minated GPI-04-03 entitled "Perfo@ance Standards
for Grants ManagemenC' This memorandum requires that performance standardsestablisbed for
project officers and their supervisors adequately address grants managemeIllresponsibilities.
BPA order 5700.6 -AI. issued January 8, 2004,27' streamlines post-award management of
assistance agreements and helps ensure effective oversight of recipient perfonnanceand
management. The Order encompasses both $e administrative andprogranup.aiica.wects of the
Agency's financi~lassistanceprQgrarn~. It requires each EP A program office providing
assiStance to develop and carry outapost..;award nicm:itoring p11l.Il, andconductbasiciIDonitoring
forevety award. Frorothe programmatic standpoint, this monitoringshou:Idensuresatisfaction
of five cOtearea.s: (l)tompliance withallproghunrilatic terms and conditions; (2) correlation of
therecip~ent's w.otk pIanlapplicationandactualprogress under the award:; (3) availability of
funds tocompIete the project; (4)prOperIIiaIlagement .of and accounting f()reql.1ipment'
purchased undedheaward;ahd (5)~OtJ:lpliancew#hallstatutory and regt1.latoryrequirementsof
,tl1eprogram. Ifdl.1rlng monitoring it is detertnined that there is reasonto be1ievethat the grantee
has committedorconunits. fraud; wasteandlorabllse,then the project. ()fi,icermtl#~ontact the
Officeo:fthe IpspectorGeneral. A-dYM1c~ tt1!)Ilitor:untactivities mfi~tbe'4f>~11Ii:ieritedir1 the
omcia1ptfil~and the grantee compliance datahase. The EPA Orderappues to theproj,ects
identified in Att~hment1. ,,', ," "
Inadditi.olitpthegenetalteq1iitementscOiitilined..in the EPAOtder,thefol1owing.types of
activities, whicharedlrectly re1ated4ocoIlStr:uCtiOn' proje<;ts, shouldpe 'cPIlsid~etii~ the
development ofa'postfa\YardD;loniti>tjn,gplati: ' ,
-'Reviewperiodic paymenttequests.
..C()nduct~terim inSpeCtiorts,
.,~evj~wchJ:!t1geofders.a't,td c1~irns.
-Review and approve flIlaLpaymeJ1,trc::quests.
- Analyze. el1"vU-OIl1J1ental reyieW docUrnentsforNEP A-complian:ce,if~arisappt9priateat
tllis time (as applicable to Reg10nswherethe prqject officer also undertakes the
NEP"Aresponsibilities).
_ DetenxUne'tI1atllieprojectistapable of meeting the objectives f"orwhichit
"Yas planned; . del)ignedand bui It.
26 Thes~ GPls are available on the EPA intr:met at
bttp:! lintrailet.epa.govlogdlpolicyn. O-GPI~GPI -03"0 1- 5 ;htrn and
http.:/lintranet.epa.gov logdlpolicyn ~O-GPI -GPI..O().;05.htm
27 The Order is available on the EP A intranet at http://intranet.epa.govlnnpoJicy/adslordersl5700_6Al.pdf
23
Many ofthese activities can be performed bya State, the Corps of Engineers or a contractor, and
as such, are eligible for funding under the three percent set-aside provision.
A work group consisting of staff from the Regions, thc:3 Office of Water, and the Office of
Grants and: D ebannent has been established for the purpose of developingrecommendations for
altefrlative reporting procedutesthat would comply with the requirements ofEP A Order 5700.6
AI. 'The scope of the work group will be expanded to include development of recommenqations
foralternauve reporting procedures thaf\villcomply with the requirements contained in GPl.OO.
,0$ ~'C6~t~eview Guidance."
AGENcY COALS FOR COM~;LETINGANDCLOSINGOU1"P:ROJECTS
On June 10, 1997, the Agency issued a strategy faT administratively completing and closing
(>uttheremaining construction grant pr()jects.28 Admiiiistiati ve, c6D1pletion takes place when a
flproaud:jtis requested; or ifapnal audit is not required" when the following has been achieved:
aU 'the gnmt conditions have been satisfied, a fin.aliDspectionhasbe~performed, the final
payment has been reviewed andprocessed."andprojectpenormance:st@darci$:29 have been
acl!i~y{;:d.. Closeout takes p1ace'Yhcipicloseout letter is sentt6 the~trecipient. The June JO,
1997 strategy document establlshed lliegoa16f. adrnimsqativelYG9l1lpletillgpost FY 1991
cQI1S1Tucti<>n grant and spei:i'fli1pprpprt(l#pnsActprojeCtswiWiJ.fiy~ye#sof grant awardjand
closing>'<>llt conStructiongran~ait4~pe~UljA.ppropt;titionsA ctproJ~cisWjthin, seven YearSQf
gtaP.1;iward. Accordingly, all futiIregrantawards,exceptinthosecircu,mstal}ceS where the '
comp'I~xlties Qr size ofthepr()jectaidateothflrwise,shouldincludesc:lI~dules that are in
cOiJ.f.t?rmance with the natiollalgo~s~
:PROJECT OFFICER RES:r.ONSIBWlTI:ES30
, '
, '
The project officerS m1istreview the grant application fo dt:::termine that:
the scope ofw6rlcofth~_grant is clearly defined;
the scope of work isinconforrnance with ,theprQjectdescnption containedip
Attachment 1; , "
there is a clearly statedehvitomneptal or public health obJective;
28 In a memorandum dated May 6,1999, the Agency issued supplemental guidance providing clarification
to the completionlt1oseout strategy. '
29 Project performance standards are defined at 40 CFR 935.2005(33).
30 "Assistance AdministrationManua15700 thg 6; Part 1, Section 02, Roles and Responsibilities" is
avaHableonthe EP A intranet at http://intranetepa.gov/rmpolicyiads/transmanuals.htm
24
work plans31 contain well-defmed outpllts ~nd, to the maximum extent pl:acticable,
well-defined outcomes, and demonstrate linkage to the Agency's Strategic Plan
goals, objectives, and sllbobjectives;
thefe is areasonable chance that the project will achieve its objective(s);
the environmental review docllITIents arebTEPA~compliant, if that isa.ppropriate at
this time (as applicable to Regions where the project officeralso undertakes the
NEPA responsibilities); and
the costs are reasonable, necessary andaHoqableto the project.
Grant applications should be processed irtatimelymatmer. but the applications should be
carefully reviewed and the grant awarded only whenitis pftId~Ilt to do .50. AdditiOl1aUY~ tile
Regions may imposereasonablerequiiementst~oughgrant conditions inth6se situations,
considetedriecessary.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT RESOURCES
YOll should.invite Stateag, endes to participate as much as possible in thepre~applicati,oIi.
application review ,and.~arit3,t:1rmI1istratio:q proc~s:
te~slative lanEP3gein the Agency's ~y 1997 Appropriations Act autborizedtheuseof
TitlelI deobligatioll$ for S~te a<4ninistrationor$~i~lApproptiations Act:wa~teff'atEl"piojectS,
co~taVpeedy citie~pJ."(:>jects ~dc{jnstructiongt~NPtojec~s: 'rheguidance doc\1fi;len:~onthe
implementation of this provision was issued by the Difector~ ,Municipal Support DiYisj911,On
December, 3 1996}2 ' , '
.'.' '. ."
The interagency a.greement(IAG) with th,e Corps of Engineers was recentlY1Uilen(iedto
allow theIAG fundsfo be usedfot'the adtpJnis~ation,' 9VerSigpt ,and managemen~or~uspe~)al
Appropna.tions ACt proj eets, induding thbsejnvolying ,drinking water and other water re,l~ted
~~~ffi. '
, "
States mayal~o usefuugsa,warqed 1Jilder S~ctionlP6oftheClean 'Vater Act~+;l" 92-
500') for ,activities ass"Ociatedwiththese specialprojectsprovic:led Section l06p:I:'ogtarIip$cials
agree.
The Agency'sFY 2001 Appropriations ActstatesJhat"the AdministratorI1'i.~YJlseupJo 3
percent of the amount of each project appropriated to administer the managementa:nd overnight
of cOllstro<;ti on of suchproj ects, through corttracts,allqcatic:mto the Corps 'ofEngineets, 'or grants
to States:' A discussion: of the three percent set-aside provision is contained on page two ofthis
memoraI1dum. "
31
, See Footnote 13, supra,
32 This document is available on the internet at \vww.epa.gav/owrnlmab/owm0328.pdf.
25
REVIS10N OF LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN PREVIOUS APPROP;RlA'DONS ACTS
The Agency's FY 2005 Appropriations Act amended the following STAG eannarks:
The project description for Earmark Number 471 (FY,2003) for the Town of Mercer,
Wisconsin was changed to "water infrastructure improvements."
Earmark Number 22 (FY 2004) w~ changed from '''$400;000 to the West Lauderdale
County Water and Fire ProtectionAuff.1ority, Alabama for construction of a water
treatment plant" to 0<$200,000 to Jackson County,Alabania forwa;tersystern
in}pr()vements and $200,000 to the City ()fMuscle Shoals, Alabama for Water and sewer ,
infristtucture improvements."
..,.. TIie project description for EannarkNwnber 158 (FY 2004) to the City of Burlington,
Illinois was changed to "water and Wastewater infrastructure itnprovernents:'
~ Th~designated recip~ent for E~a;rkNU1l1l;>er 9 {FY 2002)w~~)1cwge(iftom the
.'Southeast Alabama 'Re$1onal Water Authbrity'" to the "Southwest Alabama Regional
Wafer Authority." .
EannarkNumber 103 (FY 2002)w~cha.11gedfrom. "$500?OOP for;RbckFalls, llIinois,
'W;l.stewater treatment improvell'l.ents;'to "$SOQ,OOO fortl1eCityo.fCliipag;o, Illinois for
1YilteI:infrastmcture i1:11PrOVemell~,at t.he Tbonlas Jeffer~oIJ: ap4LakeVi:~ Pumping
Stl!-tions~>>
']1ie' designated reCipi~nt forE~~k NW11ber484(FY_2()04)i-VMcbaD.g~qfrom
'"Norrolk" to '~ortsmotltffi'~'ljrgimi' ' " , ',' ,
.... .....
Tl1edesignated recipientfotE.arril~Ntlmber 2$3(FY2(jQ4)Wa.scb.c$~~dfroIn the "CitY
of KalispeH. Montana" tothe~'Fl~thead County Water and $~wer District No. 1 -
J;.v!:ll'green."
"'"", T11edesigrtatedrecipiertt for EarmatkNumher139 (FY2003)waschangedfrom the
'~StateofHawaii HealthDeparltt1ettt~to the "County ofHawaiir
Earmark Number 148 {FY 2004)waschanged from "$l;Ood,ooo foiOahu County>and
Kauai County, Hawaii for water infIastrudureimprovements"to "$1;000,000 forthe
replacement of cesspoolsiIlHawaii, $250,000 to the City and. Count)' of Honolulu for
Varona Village, $500,000 to the County of Hawaii and the temainderto the Housing and
Community Development Corporation ~fHa\Vaii."
EannarkNumber 388 (FY 2004) was changed from "$1,500;000 tathe City of La:wton;
Oklahoma for the Southwest Water Treatment Plant" to "$1,500,000 for the Southwest
26
Water Treatment Plant in Lawton, Oklahoma for W'aterand wastewater infrastructure
improvements."
Theproject description for Earmark Number 46 (FY 200nto Lewes, Delaware was
changed to "wastewater treatment improvements.';
The designated recipient for Eaimark Number 409 C:fY 20(4)waschariged from '1:heCity
ofPh:iladdphia, Pennsylvania Water Department" tb"the Philadelphia Water
Department!'
The designated recipient fOIEarinark Number 265 (FY 2004) was changed from
"Franklin Coutlty,"Mississippi to the "OkhissaLak.eSewerIJistrict."
The project description for Earn1ark Numb er 322 (FY20P4)to the Village of Bndiccitt,
New Yark -vvaschangedto''Wastewater and waterirtfrastructureirnprovements." ,
'The project desCI;iptiol1 fOT~k Number 173 (fY 2004.) to the Vl1lage 6fArmih.gto~
illinois was changed. to"planning, design and constructlollofa,sap.itary sewerpr~ject/'
Earmark NUIriber 184 (FY20Q4) was changed frt;l1,rt"$2.50;QOO to be divided equally
between V anderburgh C;oiuityand the Cit)fofEvanSville, Indian~for:Pi.geonCreeJ{; ,
wastewater systemim:proveD1ents" to "$25P,OOOtq Vatld~bw-gh CountYortp.e"citY.(>f
Evansville,fudianafor Pige~n Creek wastew~tei $y~,~@ii):lpro'vemen.tsY ..,
, ACTIONS
If you h;wenot a}rt::a,d,y>qones9,youand YOuTstaffshou.ld initiate dlscllssionSwithtbe
appropriate grant aPP,licants todbvelQP a detailedscopeaf\vorkandJgexplainth~gnriJ.t, ., .
applivation and review prqces~, Additionally) thept applic;@~Sh()tHQhepfoyided" With~c<:>py
6fthis memoranduin priotto :grati~ua:ward to ensure thattheapplicarttis on notice ofth~ ' , , '
applicable requirements before tb,e,grartt is award~., '"
If you have anyquestio1,1s.conceming the contetltsdfthismeIliora!ldUIIl, you may contact
me, or have yoUr staff contact BenJaminJ. Hamm) Chief. MuniCipal Assistance Branch, "
Municipal Support'Division, at (202J564-o648. . , "
Attachments
cc: Municipal Construction Pr6gram Managers. ;Regions I.,X
Regional :I\,TEP A Contacts, Regions I ~X
Mark Tedesco, Long Island Sound Office, RegionTI
Marcia Combes, Alaska Operations Office, RegionX
ATTACHMENT 1
, ' ,
1
~ECIAL WATERANDWASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (STAG A~COUNT)
'CLUDED IN EPA'S FY 2005 APPROPRIATIONS ACT
ne 6udget Earmark Designation Earmark Rescission Set Aside Grant Description
~m# Code Amount Amount
,,','
Connecticut
92 GLO Meriden, City of 150,000 1.200 4,500 144,300 for the City Center Initiative Flood Control
and Demolition .
93 AXI NewHritain,CitY of 300,000 2.400 8,900 288.700 for water infrastructure improvements
Southirigton, City of , for the Southington Water SupplY
94 AXI 500,000 4,000 14,900 481,100 Improvement Project
95 GE6 Stamford, City of, 200,000 1,600 6,000 192.400 for storm water Infrastructure imorovements
96 GUW G reton, City of 350~000 2800 10,400 336,800 forwater and sewer line extension
478 GQG Bristol, Citv of 300;000 2,400 8,900 288.700 for water infrastructure improvements
479 GBW i::astHampton, lawn of 300;000 2.400 8,900 288,700 fordrinking water infras.tructure
improvements
480 GPD Stamford 250,000 2.000 7,400 240.600 fora waste-to-energy project
8 total 2,350,000 18;800 69,900 2~261,300
Massachusetts
Boston, City of 10 continue, efforts to address deteriorating
220 GElJ 200,OOc> 1.600 6,000 192,400 groundwalerlevels in !he Greater Bostori .
area
Towns ofaraintree. Holbrook and ,~, for water and w;lstewater inftas1ruc\Ure
221 GW Randofol1 ' ' ' ' 200~00Q 1,600 6,000 192,400 improvements " ,
222 AUH Cities of Fall River an<l Ne~ sl50;qoo 7.690 28,300 914,100 fO,r combined sewer overflow proJeeill
Bedford
223 OL5 Lawrence, CitY OfH 200;000 1,600 6,000 192,400 for combined sewer overflow mitiQallon "
Leomlster.City of :c, for the Rockwell Village revilalizallcin
224 GV\J 4oo.00q 3,200 11 ,900 384,900 Initiative for water infrastructure
improvements
225 .GJR Essex County 250,000 2,000 7,400 240.600 for wasteWater proiects for communitie,s
226 OBA Pioneer Valley Plannlflg pD();OQO 4.000 14,900 481.100 for the Connecticut River combined'~r
COmmission In West $pnnoflald overflow , '
531 (3QY aiisto\.County 250;000 2.000. 7,400 240,600 for the Combined Sewer Ove,rlIOW
Abatement Proiect ,
532 QBA " Pioneer' Valley Planning " 250;Q\IO 2;OOq 7,400 21\0.600 for combined sewer overflow abatementln,
Conimission ' ....',.. the Connecticut River' ",
9 total ' 3;:2(11)';0'00 " 25.~00 95,300 . 3;079,100
.... Maine, " ' :'
212 .GMO Wiridham, TOINO of ,200,000 " 1,600 6,000 192,400 for wastewater infrastructure Imoro~ment$'
213 GVS Brewer, Citv of 500;000 4;000 14,900 481,100 for the, sewer imtirovementsorolect
Gre~ler Limestone Wastewater Treatment Facjljtl.es to:
Consolidate and replace antiqua1e<1V@sl"e
519 GqV, 450,000 ", 3,600 13,400 433,000 water Conection and tteatmentfacilllie$at ,
the Loring Development Authority ILDA1~nd
CariboU Utilities Dislrict [CUD] "
IndiariToWnship TMbal , for the f!r$tphase for expanslonotcuirent,
520 GD4 2$qi09Q . 2,000 7,400 240,600
~emment " laCloOn5vS:tem to provide adeouate~riaCitV
, Ma(;hias,ToWn,of for repla~ment pf s~ and eomp!e!loflcef
5?1 GGV $OO.WJ 2;400 8,900 288.700 deficiencies ,at mosting aging waste.....~\er ' ,
1.700;OpO treatment plant
5t,olal 13;60.0. " 50,600 1;635;800
New HamDshlre .,
254 AXH Nashua. City 01 150;000. 1 ;2()() 4;500 144,300 for wastewater Infrastructure ImprOvements
New Hampsl'lireOepar1menl of , for sewefsystem expansion In Frankijri
255 GN2 eriilii:Onmenlai'Sei"vices '~oD;oo6 1;600. 6,060 19t.400.
256 003 , , S6merWorth, Citvof 200;0(l() 1-;600 6,000 ,1,92.400 for Wastewater infrastructure irrioroVements
, serlin WaterWorkS ii:l Berlin for dnriklng water diStribution system
566 ASK eop;006 4,800 H,~ 577 ,30.0. Improvements '
&;7 AXH Nashua Com!:>ined sewer 400;00.9 ' 3,200. 11,900 384,900 for CSO treatment and. abatement
Ovetnow proiect in Nashua
New Hampshire Departnient of to develop a septa9!l trea !men! facility-
568 GY9 Environmental ~ices 400.0()0 3,200 11,900 384,900 based at the wasteWater ti'eatmefltlal:jlity iti
, , Franklin
569 eYA Troy ~O;OOO 1,600 6,000 192,400 for a wastewater and water improvement
program
570 QBG Manchester New Hampshire 40.0.000 3;200. 11.900 "384.900 for Combined Sewer Overflow project in
Manchester
571 GDT Rochester 200,00.0 1,600 6.000 192,400 for Route 108 sewer line extension
Somersworth for the sewerage improvement program to
572 QQ3 150.0.0.0. 1,20.0. 4.50.0 144.300 provide upgrades to the wastewater
treatment plant
573 GRE Bristol 20.0,000. 1.600 6,000 192,40.0 for wastewater system improvements
574 GYB Milton 150,000 1,200 4,500 144,300. for a water storaCie lank reotacemeritoroi~
STAG FY 05 Lisl Final revisedZ.xLS
2
5751QRJ Exeter. Town of 600.000 4.800 17 ,900 577,300 fer water treatment plant replacement
13 t.otal 3,850,000 30,800 115,000 3,704,200
Rhode Island
North Smilhrleld. Town .of 200.000 1.600 6,000 192.400 (or water and wastewater infrastructure
367 GTC improvements
GPF Newport. City of 200,000 1.600 6,000 192.400 for water and wastewater infrastl'\1cture
368 improvements
Narragansell Bay Commission in 200.000 1,600 6,000 192.400 for combined sewer .overflow control and
369 A81 Providence wastewater improvement proiect .
621 GYl Shannock Water District, 250.000 2.000 7.400 240,600 for water infrastructure improvements
622 GOC Lincoln Water Commission 250.000 2,000 7,400 240.600 for water infraslructureimprovements
623 OLE Pawtucket Water SUoOlV Board 250.000 2.000 7.400 240.600 for water infrastructure imprevements'
624 GYO North KinQstown. ToWliOf 250.000 2.000 7.400 240.600 for water infrastructure improvements
Narragansett Bay Commission 1.000.000 8.000 29.700 962.300 fer c.ombined sewer overflow infrastructure
625 A81 ,,' .. improvements
626 GPF Newoort, Cltv.of 500,000 4,000 14.900 481,100 (or waler infrastructure improvements
627 qee Warren, Town of 500,000 4.000 14,900 481,100 for sewer Infrastructure improvememls
1 0 ~otal 3,600,000 28,800 ' 107,100 3,464.100
Vermont .. '
[ 647JeYS Colchester.. Town of 1.250.000 10.000 37,200 1,202.800 (or wastewater infrastructure improvements
r 64BIGCJ Waitslield, Town.of 1,000.000 8,000 29,800 962.200 (or wastewater infrastructure imprevements
2t6tal 2,250,000 18,000 117\000 2,165,000
4; Region 1 Totals 16,950,000 135.600 504,900 16,309,500
W:,,~~~ .~~....,' f1~.@m~~~~j~ff:igi-~-41W-.mii' ~~~~;~~~~~~ ~~t~ ~~'""~ ~~f:t~11~f~~~~~ ;~~::.?)1~~'}0IP.:';'~:;~i'~}~:t~1~~~dt~rfi,~~'~Ji~t..m-~:
~i'it~l!i~ -,;,- ,- '+.;'lJ~"t : ".~_~_.,....~~__i
".;t~. .~~'_...... - ~;t!::,.:.
New Jersev
257 GW1 Parsiooanv. Towrishio,Of 1,000.000 8.000 ,29,800 962.200 for water infrastructure imoi'OVements
258 GMZ WildwoOd. City of , 250.000 2.000 7,400 240.600 (or storm sewer outflow recbnstrue1ion
259 $SZ New Jersey MunidpalUtilities 250,000 2,000 7,400 240.600 for the Peninsula at eayonne HarbOtWater
Authority , Infrastructure Impr.ovement Project ' "
260, ~TI' Passaic Valley Sewe,age 400.000 3.200 11.~ 384,900 for the Combined Sewage Ovllrflow
Commissien proQram
261 GN4 Bercen CountvUtililies. Alithon'tv 100,000 800 3,000 96,200 lor wastewater infrastru.cture imorovements
262 aVl New Jersey Mead.owland~q , 300,000 2,400 8.900 288,700 for the Hackensack MeadOWlands
Commission Ecosvstem Restoration
57'6 GRG Townshio of ParSiooanv"Trov 500,000 4,ooQ . J4,900 . 481.100 f.or water infrastructure 'improvements
571.: q~y' Bayonne. City Of 1,250;000 10,00Q 37,200 1.202.800 for water and wastewater infrastructure,
improvementS, -. ' , . ,.'
~r'-otal 4,050,000 32,4QO . 120;500 3.897,100
New York
211 GW3 Brookhaven. Citv ar 200 .000 1.600 6;000 192.400 for storm water infrastructure imoi'tlvements
272 ~5 Chenange CountyA9rlcu~ral 100.000 800 3.()(I() 96,200 for upgrades to the water and septic
SodeN of Chenan<lOCOuntv svstems' ' .
27,3 eW6 Schulver. ToW" .of 125,000 1.000 .' '3.800 1;20,200 for water sYStem imerovemenls
27'4 GN7 Bridaewater. Villaae-or' -, 200000 1.600 6;000 192 400 l.on.vater infrastructure imorovements
275 GyV4 Spril1gport and Fleiniii9' 'T~$of 200,000 1.600, ,6,000 192.400 for water and wastewater infrastnicture
'. " , imer.ovements ' ' . ' '",,'
21~ 'f>5w RO<:kland County -,,' for the Western Ramapo sewer extenSion
-. ..', 300,000 2,400 8;~ 288,700 and water reussproiect. , ...
Ztl :GNB Deoesit.VlIlaae of" ,'. ' -, 250,000 2.000 7,400 240.600 for wastewater li1fraslructureimprovemenlS
278 GW5 BI60mino Grove, Tovnfof 250 000 2,000 7,400 240.600 for wastewater Infrastructure imDnWem~nts:
.., Sea Cliff. Villageof-' 300.009 8,900 far the Sanitary SeWer System InfraSJiU<;ture'
Z7!l GNE 2,400 288.700
-.. Develooment and Manaciement Project
280 GW8 Mamarone. VilIaaeof " '.. 110,000 900 3.300 105,800 for sewersvstem imoroveme,i11s
2et -<3N9 New Castle. To'NrlQf 150,000 1,200 4,500 144,300 for the Phase II Storm Waler Comp!iance
" Prooram "
282 OOy Osweoe, City of ," 250,000 2.000 , 7.400, 240.600 for sewer overt1.ow~tem improvemef1ts
- Wamerville Water DiStrict 111 for a,water and sewer project
283 ~N8 Wamerville 275.000 2,200 8,200 264,600
264 GNA Cheektowana. Town of 250.000 2,000 MOO 240.600 .or the Plant. N.o. 3 overfJow, retention fac.ililv
-c- Erie Water Authorityfor lheTown for Water infrastructure ImProvementS
285 GW7 of Newstead and ViiJageof 650.000 5.200 19;300 625.500
Wliliamsvme
256 GNC TownNillaoe .of EaslRochester 200.000 1,600 6,000 192.400 for sewer infrastructure improvements
Dutchess County Waterahd for wastewater Infrastructure improvements
287 GNO Wastewater Authority In Hyde 1,000.000 8.000 . 29.800 962,200
Pari<
288 AMI:: Onondaaa Lake 12,000.000 96.000 357;100 11.546.900 for continue<l clean water imorovements
289 GTO M.onroe County WaterAulholitv 4.000.000 32.000 119000 3,849.000 for the Eastsi<le WaterTreabnentPrOiect
290 GW9 Wayne County 900.000 7~OO 26;800 866,000 for conslruction of a waterline along North '
Geneva Road
291 QWW Wayne County Water aOd Sewer 600,000 4,800 17,900 577,300 water infrastructure improvements in the
Authority Tewn of Huron
STAG FY 05 List Final revised 2.XLS
3
292 ANI Drinking water infrastructure 4,000,000 32,000 119,000 3,849,000 in the New York City Watershed
needs
293 060 Lonq Island Sound,NewYork 4,000,000 32 ;000 0 3.968,000 for Water Quality infrastructure
294 GNK Jamesville, New York. sewer 1,000.000 8.000 29,800 962,200 for Wa.ter quality infrastructure
oroiect improvements
29-5 GT7 Elbridoe. Town of 350.000 2.800 10,400 336,800 for the construction of a waterline
296 A5E Onondaga COunty of. 500,000 4,000 14.900 481,100 for water and wastewater infrastructure
Department of Communitv improvements
297 GNG CavuQa Countv in ViclOlV 500;000 4,000 14,900 481,100 for water infrastructure improvements
583 GCX Babylon, Town of 400,000 3,200 11.900 384,900 for the Oak Beach Park Slormwater
Manaoement Proiect
584 GYC Orange County Water AulHority. 300,000 2,400 8,900 288,700 for wastewater infrastructure Improvements
Goshen
585 GT9 Plattsburg, Towri<>f 300.000 2,400 8,900 288,700 for wastewater infrastructure, ImprovementS
30 total 33,660,000 269,300 882,800 32,507,900
Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico for drinking water irifrastructure
366 GPG 4.000,000 32,000 119,000 3,849,000 improvements to the Mewp()litano
communitvwaler system in Sanjuan
1 total 4,000,000 32,000 119,000 3,849,000
VirQin Islands
411 A80 GovemmMt of the Virginlslili1rls 250.000 " 2,000 7,490 240,600 for wastewater infrastructure system
imprO\lements in St. Croix,
1 total 250,000 . 2,000 7,400 240,600
40 Region 2 Tolal~ 41 ,960.,~ 335,700 . 1,129,700 40,494,600
~t~~1iM~1~~!:~jjJ;~ R~'I~n~.~~~~~~f~{~l~~~~~~, ~~~9~~_:i1~'Niif.~j~~~ ~~~1~~~~ '~~!jt'&~~r~ ~~f~~,~~f!~t~~~~1I~%.~f~~1~,:~1~jL~~~~~!~~_t~
DIstrict of COiumbia
97 GSV Oi strict of ColOmbia GOVernment 500,009 4,000 14,900 481,100 for rlrinl\ing water infra~truc:turll
improvements to address lead problems:
1 total 500,000 4,000 14;900 481,100
Delaware
I 981aWO Wilminoton, CiM of 400;000 3.200 11.900 384,900 for wastewater infrastructure improvements,
I 4811awo Wilminolon 250 000 2;000 7,400 240.600 for Wastewater infrastructure imorovenients '
I 4621GXO Ocean View, Town.oC :250,000 2,000 7,400 240;600 fOr wastewater infraslNcture improvements
3 total 9C10,O.OQ 7;21lO 26;700 866,100
Marvland "
<
214 AW5 Salisbury, Citvof , ,. '- 250,000 .,', 2,000 7,400 240,600 for wastewater infrastructure improvements
,215 QCP Cambridoe, CitvOf 250;000 2,000 7,400 240,600 for.wastewater irifras!ri.tctiire'imprtivements
216 QQM Elklon.Citv Of 2"56 000 '., 2,000 7,400 240.600 fOr wilstewater infrastructureimprpvemeiits
Prince George'$.C9imty for the ~ivable Community Initi~tivEi lI'I
217 GVT 10ci.oqo 800 3,000 96.200 Breritwood. North Bren~, Edmonston
and ColtaoeCitv "
Prince George~c;<xJrity . " for the AnaC6stia Trash ReducliOri Piogram
218 GMR 250iQQQ 2..oolj 7;400 240,600 an(l RelT1O\lSlof F1oal~bh~ T~h forth~
Cities of Brentwood andEdriiQrl6tQll
219 GMO YMCA CamoLetls.iriEdoewater' 500;"()()() 4,000 14,900 481,100 for Water ii1frastJ:ucture,improven'ients"
522 GOT OlesaoeakeBeach 250;OQO 2.000 7.400 240.600 for 'wastewater'lnfrastJ:ucture IrriDi'oven'ieritS
523 QQB Indian Head 250,000 ,2.000 7.400 240 600 for wastewater infrastru~ture IrriDtovemEintS
524 QQM E1kton , 500;000 4000 14,900 461,100 for, Wi! steWi!lerinfrastnlctute ItriDl'OVjtrrienlS
525 ,005 HurlOCk 250;000 2.000 7,400 240;600 for Wastewaler infrastJ:ucfucEl ;improvementS
526 GR1 Kent IslaM 750 000 6;000 22.300 721.700 fOr,waslewater i(jfrastJ:uclure lm1lrOvements
527 GXX Easton 250,000 2;000 7400, 240,600 for wasteWater infrastructJ.rreitllDro\ierriEin~
525 GRot Cumberland .' 750QO"O 6~OOO 22,300 721,700 for wastewater infi'llstructurelmp~ments
529 GO)( FrostbuTQ 500,000 4,000 14,900 481.100 for WasteWater infrastructure, improvements
53()GX'( Brunsw1ck 250.QAA 2000: 7,400 240,600 for wastewater infrastJ:uctl1re iI1lPn:We~ilts
1 ~total 5,350;009 42,&00 '158,900 5,148,300 ' '
Pennsviv3nia'
3$j , AlIf;l9heny Countyc 8.00\) for the, 3 Rivel$ Wet W$3ther
AN4 1,000,000 29;800 962.200 DemOnsttation Protect
353 GWL Sharon. Citv of 100~OOO 800 3,000 96.200 for the Budd Sti'eel sewer line" reola!:Bment
Philadelphia. CitY,()f to continue the planning, deSign, and
354 GP8 500..000 4.000 14,900 481.100 construction of innovaUve storin-vfater '
management solutions
Che~nham TOwnship 10 continue the planning, design, and
355 GE8 500;000 4.000 14.900 481,100 construction of innovative st6rm-water
management solutions
Beaver Falls MlinicipalAlithority for wastewater infrastrutlureimprovemenlS
35,6 QCS 250.000 2.000 7.,400 240.600 tolheBig 6eaver TreatmenlFaci6ty in Big
Beaver.
357 GPB Harrisburg, City of 250,000 2,000 7,400 240,600 for the Harrisburg Advanced Wastewater
treatment Facililv
358 QC2 Wyoming Valley Sanllal'Y 350,000 2,800 10.400 336,800 for the Wyoming Valley Combined S~wer
Authority in Wyoming Valiey Overflow Proiecl\ .
STAG FY 05 list Final revised 2XLS
4
359 GPA LiQonier Township 200.000 1,600 6,000 192,400 for the Liconier T ownshio sewa(Je proiect
GWP South Hills Area Council of 250,000 2;000 7,400 240,600 for the South Hills Area Storm Sewer
360 Governments Proiect in Alleqherw County '
361 GWO Clarion Area Authority 250,000 2.000 7.400 240,600 for the Fifth Avenue sewer fine replacement
loraiect in Clarion, '
362 GP7 Nelson Township Authority 500.000 4,000 14.900 481,100 for water infrastructure improvements In
Ne~on _
363 QKG Lancaster. City of 250,000 2,000 7.400 240,500 for the water treatment membrane prOiect
364 GZ2 Yorl< City Sewer Authorio/ 200,000 1,600 6,000 192.400 for the Clean Waler Demonstration Project
in Yorl< '
365 GG2 Kulpmont-Marion Heights Joint 500,000 4,000 14.900 481,100 for sewer infrastructure improvements
Municipal Authoritv in Kulpmonl
609 GGF Municipalitv of Penn Hills 200,000 1,600 6.000 192.400 for the Madison Avenue Storm Sewer ,
610 GYJ Nesquehoning Borough Authority, 200,000 1,600 6,000 192,400 for a water main replacement
Caibon County
6,11 Gjo Mercer County Regional Council 200.000 1;600 6.000 192,400 for the Shenango Valley ~rfi/llater'
of Governments IrT1Drovemenl Proiect ',' "
612 GYK 6erwick.lnduslrlal Development 200,000 1.600 6;000 " 192,400 for the sanit~ry storm walersY.~tem
Association, .6erwick
613 GRR Johnstown, City of 200,009 1,600 ~,OOO 192,400 for waler and sewer improve,mentsatlhEl
Poinl Stadium multi-usefadUtv', ,'" . "
Three Rivers Wet W~ther to develop innovative, cost~f'feclive
614 AN4 Demonstrationprosramii'l 1,500.000 12,000 44.600 1.443.400 solutions to assist mui1lc;ipali~stQ~Iir1'1imi.te
A1leQhenyCounty sewer overfJows "
61,5 'qqc Deny Township Municipal 250,000 2,000 7;400 240,600 for wastewater treatment planljJ~ades
Authority in Hershev
61'6 .M~ Hermitage, CityofCily o/Sharon;, " 250,000 2,O()0 7.400 240,600 for Mercer County Saiiiiary$eWer.arid
and BorouQh of Sharpsvi!le Water Treahnenl oroiect ,."
6.17 OKG Lancaster, CAtv of 250,000 2;000 7.500 - 240.500 for water infraslruclureunorolii;!t'neots"
61e (3BV Newport Borough Sewer,Authority 250,000 2,000 7,400 240,600 for storm and sewer Water: separation
il),Newport ..""
Yorl< City Sewer AuthQrityinYoi1( " for wastewater co]leCliOti$Y.$~m
619 QC1 250,000 2;000 7.400 240.600 improvements . ' ' ",
6:29 O~T Pocono "Township In Tamersvllle 250,000 2;00() 7.400 240,600 for lhe Roule 611 Co,nidorisewer line
. conslructlon " , ,
'26 tOtal , 9,100,000 72,800 270:90~ ;756,300
, ',," Vlralnla ..'
.. 399 OC3;. SmVlhCoUnlV 250,000 2,000 , 7,400 ':. ' ,240,600 for Wastewater infrastructurEI'.imotOVemenl$
400 GX1,< Hanpver County ,- 300,000 " 2;400 ,,"",', ,.8;900 " 288.700 for'wastewater infraslnlctureelmoi"O'lementS.;
.. F.auquillr County , ' for a sewage treatment~plclrit'!ou.w ", "
401 GOO- 150,000 1~~OO 4,500 . _144,300
,,' CallettlCalverton area" ':,: "',' ,,- ..
QMP Date Service Corpol'Cllion In. Dale' " 6,000 " for wastewater inrras~ll11erp.vE5J111ii~"
:4()2 City 750,000 -22,3~ 721,700
403, GPP: Isle ofWioht Counlv 100;000 800 3.000 - ,: ' 96.200 for water infraslruclu[e.:lri1rove-!rieiilS' "
A04 GX2 Halifax, Town of 500.000 ,4;000 14 ;900 ..481100, for waler irifrastructure..irIl toVements ., ....,
-405 oce' Franklin CounlV 1.000,000; 800() 29,800 ... " '96.2.200 for water infraslructUrB;ifif r:Ovemenl$
400 OCX Fh.lVanna CounlV 500.000 " 4,000 14,900 ." 481,100 for waler infrastructure iri'i" IUvemenl$ ,
407 GX3: Bi1:iOknea. T.oWn of 1,000;000 8.000 p29,800 ~ ' :962,200 for water infraslructiJre.lrii i:oVQi'riefits, .,..
4pti bSR' Nel~on County 218,000 1,7eO 6.509 '..'., 209,800 for water and wasteWat~lnflil~~re' '
.. improvementS ' ,_. .. \\.' ,
40S OOu 1DPillsvlvanla .CounlV 682;000 5.,500 <20.300 "656,200 lor water infrastructul'EdtiiDl'oVI'nenlS "
p, f;astem Shore, Qf Virginia PilbliC ,', , p' p' "- for wastewater infraSWgui8J~~iil~
410 QB$}' Service Aulhprily in ' 2PO,OOQ 1,600 6;oo(l 192,400 ...
....-... NOrtnhampton CounlV
Alexandria. City 6fVirginiaand , for waler infraslructui'e:,linptoVemems:II'Uhe
41~ ~T2' Arfinaton County ,- , ", 1,OOO,{)QO 8;000 29,800 962,200 Four Mile Run waterS"hec! ' "
'. Fairfax County Waler Authority' for the drinking wat~rll:1(raslnlcW~ "
4549 A1F ... 400.000 3.200 11.900 384,900 improvements associateo;.wi!h'theEJectriC
Refiabffilv proiect ,.., ", P, ,.',~' ~ ',~,,'
650 QCG, Caroline County 300.0QO 2.400 8;9001 288.700 for the Dawn Wastewatenre~tmenl~et
c;YV Norfolk, City of '400;OO~ ' " for !he Norfolk seweran~Wat~ '
65..1 3;2116 11 ;900 384,900 InfrasthJclure Replacemenr; -,
1'6t&1 7,750,000 62;00a 230,800 7,457,200
WMt VirCllnla
427 GTA Kanawha County CorTirnisslon. 200,000 1,606 6,000 192,400 for the Upper FishersBrariChl~uthrieWater
Kanawha County Project
.' Braxton County Development for the Curry Ridge WalerliFieExlenSiOO
~28 GPv Authority 200.000 l,600 6,006 192,400 Development Autholjlv ,
429 GOD Marshall County Public Service 1.000,000 8.000 29;800 962,200 for water and wasteYialeririfraslrueWte
District #4 , improvements
430 GPX Jane Lew Public Service District 100,000 800 3.00() 96.200 for water and wastewater
in Hamson County
431 Of>4 Pleasants County Public Service 1,500,000 12.000 44,600 1,443,400 for waler and wastev'lalerinfras\IiJCLure
District improvements
STAG FY 05 List Final revised 2.xL$
432 GXe
433 GPW
434 GX9
435 G01
436 GEG
437 GXB
438 GQ3
439 GQ4
440 GXA
441 G02
442 GXC
16 .t6tal
77
Grant County Commission
Shinnston, City of.
Pine Grove. Townef
Fairmont Sanftary Sewer Board
Petersburg, City of
River Road Public Service District
Taylor County Public Service
District
Taylor County .commissiOn
Cameron, City of
Hammond Public Serilice.Distric1
Canaan Valleylnstl!Ute
Reglon 3 Totals
5
480.000 3,800 14,300 461 900 to extend water service to the Deep Spring
, area
900.000 7,200 26,800 866 000 !or water and wastewaler infrastructure
, Improvements
750,000 6,000 22.300. 721 700 ~or water and wastewater infrastructure
. Imorevements
1,000,000 8.000 29,800 962 200 !or water and wastewater infrastructure
, Improvements
2,374,000 19,000 70.600 2284 400 !or water and wastewater infrastructure
. . Improvements
101,000 BOO 3,000 97 200 10 extend water service on National Church
, Hollow Road
935,000 7,500 27,900 899 600 ~or waler and wastewater infrastructure
, Improvements
833,000 6,700 24,800 801 500 !or water and wastewater infrastructure
, Improvements
1,000,000 8,000 29,800 962,200 !or water and wastewater infrastructure
Improvem(lnts
55.000 400 1,700 52.900 for the \,..3zear's Lane water orolect
to work in conjunctionwiththl'l Highlands
1,840,000 14,700 54,809 1 770 SOD Action Program for ;lrll~novatiVe .
, , wastewater demonstrationprogr<!m In
Canaan Vaneyin Tucker County
13,2G8,nOO 106,100 395,200 12,766,700
36;868,000 294,9()() 1,097,400 35,475,700
11GKL
2 GUJ
3GKN
4 GUL
5GKP
6 GUK
7 QMR
, 8 QEU
9 QPB
10. QOY
11 GKT
12. GT2
13 GUM
14 CiES
1.5 QN5
16 Qr~C
1.7QEK
18 61:9
19 !3KR
20 QER
21 QUB
22 GT3
23GKz
24 QEO
25 AQ3
26 QOG
27GKW
28QP3
23 GKX
Alabama
Falklrille, City Of.'.
Albertville, CitVar ..
Boldo, Citvof
Addison. City of
Lamar County
Arlev, Cilv of
Eva, Cilv of ... ..
Guin, CitY of
Phil Campbell, CitV,.of
Blount County ...
DeKalb-Jacj(ScinVVaie.rSupply'.
Distrlclin Ider.' ,.. .
Fort Payne
...
Helena Utili\V:eoarllln Helena..
Jackson, CityQf' .
.. ....:
Athel'ls, Gity of.. . .
Lawrence COuntv
HunisviUe, City. Of
Hartselle UUliti~> . .
.... ..
Harvest-MOriroViaWater;$~r;
and Fire Pri:lt~ij .. .
Limest()ne.CClilmyWlll~al'l4
Sewer AuthciritV. . .. .. .
Waterworks BOatdsofth~ToWns
of $ection.aIldDLiltOrl
Scottsb<iroWater~iI<,$,~et) .
and. Gas Board.irJSe9its~
Sheffield, CitY of
West Morgari-'Eastl8WrellCe
Water and Sewer Authority
Jackson County
MUSCle Shoals, City of
Community Of Overlook Hills in
Dallas County . ..
Fulton, Town of
Red Level. Town of
STAG FY 05 List Final revised2.XLS
400,000
750,000
180,000
200,000
220,000
350,000
200,000
200,000
250.000
500;000
500,000
150;000
250,000
250,000
200,000
500,000
2SO;000
490,990
100,000
300,000
400,000
500;000
600,000
200,000
50,000
400,000
100;000
100.000
150.000
3,200 ..
6000
1,400
1.600
1,800
.
2;800
160.0...
1,1)00
2;000
4,000
4,000
1,200
2,000
2;000.
1,600"
4;0()()
2000
3.2oQ
11,900
22.300
5.400
SMa
6,~
10;400
1);000
6;000
7.400
.14.900
14,900
4;qQO
7.400
.7;.199
6..00.0
14,900
7.0400
11 ;9Q9
800 3.000
2;400 8;900
3;2cOO 11.900
4,OQtl 14,900
4,800 17,900
1,600 6, O:O(J
400 1,500
3,200 11,900
800 3,000
800 3.000
1,200 4,500
384,900 lor sewer Infrastructure hnOFOvements;
721,700 for sewer infrastructureimnrovEmfunls:
173.200 for waterinfrastruclure jmorovt;!ments
192.400 for sewerinfrastructuJelm~ements
211 700 for infrastructure impro~mentstolhe
, Lamar County ReselVOlr .
336,800 for W<lter infrastructureimorovements
192,400 for sewer infraslrl;lctureimol'Ovements
192.400 for water infrastructurellTirifllvsments
240,600 for water.infrasttuctureimtlroYemems
481.100 lor water infrastructureimnrovementS
481,100 lor construction of a Watei'treatrileilt'plant
. .
144,300 for a pump station at WiltsValleylhduslrial
Park ... ..
240,600 for sewer infrastructUre iintirQVements
240 600 !or water and waSlewatei'infra~rure
. , Improvements .. .
192,400 forwastewaler infra$tnictUll!Jmpfuvements
481,100 for the Bankhead f"OOlstWetei: Piti!(lct
240,600 for waterlnfrastruclLire ilT\OtO\1e~hts
384 900 for W<lste'll'a1er infrastnJctijrellT1pro.vements
. in Hartselle
for ~ master plan to ac;eompllsh .~.
96,200 establishment of a ~wei-systemWithin the
service area
288,700 for water infrastructure IrnproVemeOts
.
384,900 for water infrastructure Imprr:lVeme$
481 100 for ~struction and~brntatiQnofa
, sanrtal'Y sewer collectiOn sYStem
577 300 !or waler and wastewater InfrasttUclure
. Il'J1provements
192 400 !or water and ,:",astewater system.
, Infrastructure ITl1proyemenls
48 1 00 ~or water and wastewater infrastruCture
, . Improvements
384 900 !or water and wastewater infrastructure
. , Improvements
96.200 for wastewater infrastnJcture improvements
96,200 to construct a wastewater treatment facility
144 300 ~or Phase II water infrastructure
, Improvements
6
30 GKU Valley, City of 150,000 1,200 4.500 144,300 to purchase Langdale Mill and Fairfax
Utilization Pia'll
31 GUO MillervillEl Waler Authority (Clay 100.000 800 3,000 96,200 for water infrastructure improvement!; in
CournyCommis!;ionl Millervllle
32 GL1 Smiths Station Water Authority 200,000 1.600 6.000 192.400 for water infrastructure improvements
Piedmont, City of Water and Utilities Board to extend water
33 GKY 30,000 200 900 28,900 lines to the Terrapin Cove/BordenSprings
area in CJebume County
444 OLB CoosaV;alley water Supply 800,000 6,400 23.800 769.800 fOT development ofa surface water supply ;(1
Dislr'ict St. Clair County
445 GQ5 Utilities Board of the City of 750,000 6,000 22 .300 721,700 for water and sewer upgrades and
Helena construction
446 GQ7 Clebume County Commission in 600.000 4,800 17,900 577,300 for county water expansion in Clebul11e.
Heflin County
447 GXO RaricJolph County Commission in 60,0.000 4,800 17,900 577,300 for Ctlunty water expansion inRalldolph
.. WedoYiee County
4-48 QQY Blount County Water Authority in 450,OO~ 3,600 13,400 433,000 for development of a county water supply
Oneonta line
Fort?ayrie, City of . . for water and sewer improvementsin Fort
449 GXG 75~,9QO 6,000 22.300 721,700 Payne . .
... .'
vvestMorgao/EastLawrence for waler arid sewer improvementS
450 GXE woller and Sewer Authority in 250,000 2,000 7,400 240,600
Detatur . .
451 GXF tiunar County commissicinin 300,000 2,400 8,900 288,700 for the Lamar COunty Water Supply Project
verrioo.
41 tolal 13;630;qOO 109,000 406,000 13.115,000
GeOrillil
130 GV2'. .A1bany;'Cit\iof 900;000 7.200 26,80.0 866 000 storm water infrastructure Impi'oVEln'ients
131 GLY Arilericus, CitY of 400,000 3,200 11,900 384,900 for sewer serVice expansion
132 GV;S AtliiOla.Clty .01 1,OOQ~OQQ 8.00P 29,800 962,200 forthe McDaniel Basin Coriibined8ew(lr
OlierflowSeoaralionoroiect ..
134 GLX .. . Plairis,CitV; of .250,000 2,000 7.4()() 240 600 for water..irifrasttucture i!nprovemilnlS
135 GLV ~alqtt:lil; GityOf 100,000 . 800 3,000 96,200 for water and wastewater i1,frasulJCtui'e
imorovements .. .
136 GYS.. .. Thoniasville; CilV of .100000 800 3,000 96.200 for extension of Sewer lines
137 GLU ,. MOlJrmei.Cllvof. .150,000 1.tOO 4;500 144.300 for wastewat(lr iilfrastructure irnorovements
.. ~':'~metV~lil.Cityof for w;ater and ~tewater InfrastructUre ...
13/! G\i~ 150,OQ() 1.200. 4,500 144.300 InlProveinents . ... .
1'39 G~ Pl'I~~!,!tY 200;PQ~ 1.600 . 6;000 192.400 .forthe. Polk County Waste\NaterCOlJe(;tlOo
.SVsteni . .. .... .
140 /iJfX.. RosYien:.C/lY.of '250000 2;000 ..7.400 -- . 240,600 for the BioCreek WatershedProiect..
141 OKI,) Atlanta.Clly Of 'T50;{)(lO 6,000 .22;300 721,700 for wasteWateririfrastrucluiellTiDrovementS
142 GLU ' Moultiia/C/lY Of '.750;000 ... 6;000 22,300 ,., 721,700 for wastewaterlnfras truclufeimriitivei'nents
.~~~~(ba~~t Georgia .. for wate(infrasb'uctui'e ilTlProvemElI'llS In
143 Q'W 'rOO,QO() 5.600' 20.800 613,600 North AlIarlta MetropOlitan Area
Byri;!rid:;!tiof .~ .. Ifor water. ;lhdwaslewater iiJfrasliiJcbJi'e
144. qvj. 15p;oo!> 1~9Q , 4,500 144,300
.-". ... ... .. imorOvements . ..
.14?~~Y, ~ia!<:i"9I~~CltYof ~s9;qQO 2;900 7.4OQ 240,600 forwaterandwastewaterinfrasli:l.!ctiJre
.. improvements .... .. ... .
..4$.OOS ... AfIilnl3;.cilY of .2SO,OQO 2;000 7;400 240.600 for the west .area .combined sewer,or:oiect..
487GQK ... ECIttilili;:ih:.Citypf . .250,000 2;000 .' .. 7;400 ,. 240,600 forwastewaler.infrasttuctureiniproye~ti;
488 ~,9S F;:<ir'$)'1l1;Cityof . ~,~~;; .,2;000 7,400 240;600 rorwas~ewater lnfr.;lsttuct.ur\llrnP~~ls-
18 b?fal- 54;801l 203,800 .6.591.400
FfOi'lda ' .',.. . ..
9~ ".- Ta~Sprinils;Gity of for water 3~wastewaterl/'lf@~~~iJta
99 '. .. 2~.()~ 2,099 7;400 240.600 improvementS
. . ..
100 GlL. GalneSvDle, City of .. 200.000 1',600 6,000 192,400 for the dePOt reQional storm wateroatk
Q@sqM:lty for the Chassahowitzka Area WasteWater
101 am 250;000 2;ocJO 7,400 240.600 CoUeclicinanciOiinking'Waler DisliiJJlitfoCl
.. .. . System . .
102 OEM l:iills~ugh Co\.Iilty . ~oO iQ(lt) 1;600 6.000 192,400 f()fth(l HillSl:lorough CouiltyAltematlye
WatetSooillies--Phase UI ,.
103 GLN. ..: Miami;Beach. ,CitY of .750,000 6,000 22,300 721,700 for.slorm Walefihfr.;lslructureIniOfl:iVernenls
104 QWS.. KeYW~t,<Cityof 250,000 2,000 7.400 240,600 for storm water infrastrucfuieirripr(iv~nls
105 OW Pemrokepjnes. City of 200.000 1,600 6,000 192;400 for watertreatmei1l exoansion
106 OJN Homestead, City of 250;OQO 2,006 7,400 240.600 for water 3.nd wastewater Infrastructure
improvements
SOuth ~eminole & NorthOrange for the replacement of wastewaterplpes.and
107 GlM County Wastewater T ranSlTlission 150.000 1,200 4,500 144,300 mechanical equipment .
AuthOrity .
108 GLK Southwest FloridaWaler 200,000 1,600 5,000 192,400 for the Peace River & MyakkaRiverWater
Management District Initiative in Polk County
109 GUG Wellington, Village of 300,000 2.400 8,900 288.700 for the retonfiguration of :llonnwater
system project
110 GLO Sarasota, CoiJnty of 350,000 2.800 100400 336.800 for waslewa terinfrastrucb.ire improvements
.sTAG FY 05 list Final revised 2.XLS
111 GUN
112 GLS
113 GFY
114 GLP
115aDV
116 aL Y
117 GUX
118 GUZ
119 GLR
12q GLT
121 GUY.
122 GLQ
123 .GEVV
124 AY6
125 GZg
126 GIN
127 Qot
c.,
128 GV1
129 GLW
483 allYs.
4MGXP
48~ AY6
34 ~9~l
195GMG.
1.96 GVQ
\. . .197, GMF
198 .0\lC
199 GML
200 (3~'i
201~'
202GMN
20~ ~~
204 GMM
505. a:xv
.
506 GG4
507 .G9~
SOB GaN
S09 mer
510 Gap
511 GXV.
512GQW
18 total
241 GMS
242 OW
243 GMX
.1],950;000
KentuckY .,.. '... ..
North Middlelo'NTl;' TOWfttif ..>.
sheoherdsvilJe,Citv'o[" .., .
HilMeW.CitY9f: ... . ,,-: .......
LouisvillelJeffersorl'C()UOlY'.. ..
MetroJ)Cilitah'Se~ri:iistiict
Louisville,Jeffer'sd!'i.QPi:lntY. ...
Metrooollta n'$eWffj-'Oistiltf .
louisVlllefJE1ffe~dr'lOOUfitj..-
MetropcilitiinSEiweiOlstftCt
WIlltesburg.GitY.9f .. .....
.........
=:Untyfl~l.p~Jitlp ...
Morehead,Cityilf ... ... ... ..
Rivera Beach, City.of
Windermere, Town of
Miami GardenS, City of
Bunnell, City or
Sl Johns County
Escambia County Utility ~utl)ority
Davenoort, CitY of
lakeworth, City of
Davie,CiIV of
South Central Regicinal
WasteViater Treatment and
Disposal Board
Starke,CiIVor.
Osceola Countlf
SI.Johns Rivilrvv;:j~r
ManaQerTiei1tDiS~ ..
Southwesl.Floridawater.. .
ManaoEimentOiSb:ict
Southwest FlOOda Water-
ManaoemenlOlstnc:t
Soulhwest Florida Watilr.
ManaoementOistrld
ClO;arWater, CitY of .
..,.
Tampa, City of .. .\.
Treasure Island;,CitVof
Kev West, Ci(ijof.
South florida.WaterMariagemen
OistrictlakeREigiOri.WatBr ....... ..
Treetmen1Pianr ... ,.
Sou!hWestFloridaWl:Ilet.. ':
ManegemeritDis~iriTamba,. '
JamestCMin;.CitVof. ....' ..
Bowlit:1g GreaniCityOf,
Hardin C6unty.'\X~~r.Di$lfi:CtNo; .
2 in Herdln COurit\i....:
City of Elktori; Kei'ltuCky..
BreckinridaeCOu.ritV'
BuJlilt CoUntV
Callowav COuntY-
Cadiz-Trioo Countv
Marsha.1I County
.y,. .
. ..
Misslssiool
Mississippi Band" ofChoGt<Iw
Indians; NeshobaCollnfii
Lamar County
Belmont, City of
STAG FY 05 List Final revised 2.xLS
200,000
200,000
2SO,OOO
200,000
500,000
250,000
350,000
200,000
.200,000
300,000
300,000
500,000
.2,500,000
..
"4'.000,000
f.i9o,ooO
309,009
5OO,.oOCl
. 1.300.000
500;000
300,000
300,000
'250,000
150,000
"100.000
'100;000
.SSD.QOp
.225,000
:225,090
'7()(}.OOO
..
1;200,000
.,.
100.Q(lO
150,000
2iOOO;000
75O,Q(lO
SOO.Ooo
..250,000
250;000
250,000
250,000
250,000
8;0 00,000
200,000
300,000
500,000
1,600
1,600
2,000
1.600
4,000
2,000
2,800
1.600
1,600
2,400
2400
4.000
20,000
32,000
9,600.
2,400
4,000
10,400
4,000
2,400
2,400
2;000
143600
1;200
'BOO
800
4,400
1,800
1;800
5;600
9;600
8Op,
1200
16,000
6,ooQ
4.000
2,000
2,000
2.000
2,000
2.000
64,000
1,600
Z,400
4.000
:.. ......,...
... t?Qo240,5OQ for the, Tampiie"YI"{E1$ioilalReCli!liti'ieo
._. . Water.oroiect.:..r.'......-.... . .
.534;400 H;272,ooO .., ,'.
...... ..
.4;500 '.......,...144,300 fOr'watei'i:iildsewerifriDroVementS
3.00096.200 for slolmwater eOmoJiii~ ...
3;00Q '96;200 10rtheHilliriew$t6rtri~rCQfnDliance..
,.... . ;1!3.4Qq ."729;200 ~~tnlCtagfaVityAn~r~e"l9f~~
,a,rOl:).. .. . '21.6;500 fo('Na~t~tei"irlrras~lifjpi'OVement$
_,,' ...,....,.. InBe&~VJlIOOe'. ... -
... ... .6,t~~ ....,.... 216,500 ~~J:~t~lnf~tiiJc:t\.Jiij(;~~yeineilts
. ,2O.llOO C:-'_673,600~0~~ctk>QQr:~'Was~~r ~nt
35 700 1..154700 for..~'..Ct1rJ~\tIl~qf.iJ:Wa~~~
";."" lTeatrneololant..... ...... . . .
~i099 .. 96,200 :~z:iti~~~~~~r!~f@
4,500 .... .'144,300 forthewate~trealniel'ltjjjllnL.
59.. .........',.5...00"....' 192.. 4500 for the:s. ou.th c.....~.~ ..il;~IKe. !1tuckYwaler
. ...,. InfTasttu:cture Prrnect. . .. _ . .
7:Z1,7oo ~~~a~~%~s~~iianlmd .
481 100 fO/' 1he'Sew.er P~~~EfP"tisjona[l(:f$eWer
.. LlrleExtenSicinl"lOiect< .
240.600 for waterinfraS1nf~re:'jirJDrovementS
240.600 forwaslewa\erinfrastnlcttJreimprovemlmlS.
.240,600 for the CilYOfHlIielWastEiWalWSvstem
240,600 for wateiinfi;astnic1ureiriloitlVeg,erilS
240600 !or drinltingwateririfra$i~
, Improvements.'
7.698,000 ' . ..,
6,000
6,000
7,400
6~{)00
14,900
. 7,400
.
10,400
6;000
6.000
-;-
8,900
8.900'
14;900
74,1fOO
119,009.
.35,700
B;~.
14~m
3S,7@
.14;900
9,{)OO
8;90(j
22;399
14,9Op
fAl>Q
7;400 .
7)100
7;400.
7~400.
238,000
6,000
6.900
.
14,900
7
192.400 for the storm water manaoemenlpJan
192.400 for storm water manaaement improvements
240 600 for water. wastewater, storm .water ; arid
, sewer infrastructure imorovements
192 400 for the Wa~tewateJ Col~tiot:l, 1;reatment
, and Disoosal System Rehabilitation Project
481 100 for the College Park Drain;ige Improvement
, Proiect In west AUQUStlne
for Waslewat(lr l'l'lalfl1en~~r
240,600 Reclamation Partne:ishlp in,Escar'rtbia
Countv ... .'.
336,800 for wastewater infrastructurelrilorovemenls
192.400 for water infraslTuctUreimoroveinenlS
192,400 forwatermainreolacEii'lient
for the 1()0%Wa~l!!VialerReuseProject in
288,700 the Cities ofDelray aeach i1ndBpyntOn .
Beach
288,700 for the water Qualit,Amtlro\iement-Pfci<rram
481;100 fordrainao(l basiriimorover'rteritS
2 405 600 for waterir)fraslniclll,!l! }rilprpiiernjlnis 10
.. , Centralllnd EasfFlOrlda . .
3 849 000 for :ontinuation Qf~Ta!llpaJ;lar~eservoir
,., Proi~ ...
1154 700 for Tarnpa BaY~~'fiTEid.VYateran,d
, , Downstre..rnAuamentatlonPrcileCl.
288 700 forthePeac;e~....er~ri<lM~lIk~~er
, Watershed Restoralioi'iJnitlallVe
- 481 ~ 100 for the Was~t~.aildRe(;IaiinedWater.
,- tnfrastructure l'fOfect. . .
....1.250,900 for sedirilentr:er11<iVa'Jrj)m.&Sfua~esOfthe
.. headiNatersalthe canal$:, ..
.481,100 f.Of waStewater ancFs>ewer system.uoorades
. ~288 ,600 forstOrmwater.irifiastructtJreJri1ISrOVenie01s
for water imprciyerfienW
.."288.700 .-
192 40. 0 for an Academic_Wetlands andWetlands
., Mitiqatioo project
ZBB 700 ~or walerand sewer infraStructure
, Improvements
481.100 for wastewaler infrastructure imoi'ovemenls
8
244 GMW Pontotoc, City of 500.000 4,000 14.900 481,100 for wastewater infrastructure imorovements
541 OW2 Tchula 500,000 4,000 14,900 481,100 for water and sewer infrastructure
imorovements
542 GY2 Brookhaven, Cilv of 500,000 4,000 14,900 481,100 for wastewater infrastructure improvements
543 GR6 Sherman, City of 500,000 4,000 '4,900 481,100 for waler and sewer infraslructura
improvements
544 GY3 Oxford. City of 1,300,000 10,400 38,700 1,250,900 for water and sewer infrastru.cture
imorovements
545 GHH F bresl. City of 750,000 6,000 22,300 721,700 for water arid sewer infrastructure
imorovements .
546 GR5 French Camp, Town of 250,000 2,000 7,400 240,600 for waler and sewer infrastructure
imorovements
10 total 5,300,000 42,400 157,800 5,099,800
North Carolina
298 GWA Landis. l"own of. 250,000 2,000 7,400 240,600 lor waler and wastewater infrastructVre
improvemenls
Hamett County, 10 install pump stallons and aforcemainas
299 GNL 200;000 1,600 6,000 192,400 part of a central waslewaler trea~nt
rehabiritallon project .
300 GNJ Towns of BiscOe, Star, andTrov 200,000 1,600 6,000 192,400 for the Montoomerv Countv Sewer Proiect
301 GWa lowns of HamlH'Rocldnohari1 200,000 1.600 6,000 192.400 for wastewater Infrastructure imotoVements
302 GNF Fannvllle. Town of 200,000 1,600 . 6,000 192,400 for wastewater infrastructure improvementS
303 GWC Cities of East Arcadia. Bolton and 150,000 1.200 4.500 144,300 for a regional water system
Sandvfield
304 GNH Wendell. Towo.of 200,000 1,600 6,000 192,400 for the Bulfalo Creek Inlerceotor oroiect
305 /1ZZ Chanotle. .CilVof 250.000 2;000 7,400 240,600 for the wastewater olant expansiOli
306 GTB Aoex, Town of 200,000 1,600 6.000 192,400 for wastewater Infraslruclurelmprovements
Wake County for water infrastructure Improvements!n
307 GNR 1,500.000 12,000 44,600 1,443.400 cooperatiOn with \he Town orCiiryand
Durham County
308 0\.8 Orange County SOO,OOO 4,000 14.900 481,100 for waler and wastewater infrastrUcture
. improvements
309 GNN Orange Water aridSewi;lr. 650,000 5,200 19.300 625,500 fora water reuse project.
Au1horitv (oWA'M\
Gl=T HiIlsborough, T(iwnof 200,000 1,6()() '6,000 192,400 for water andwaslewalet lnfrastrocture .
310 lmorovements. .
.
311 GNM Eastern Band tifCherOkee 880,000 7,ooQ 26,200 846,800 for water infrastruclureimprpvemi;l,,15in
. Ind.ians CheroKee.. . . .
312 GNP McOciwell CounlV 1,000,000 8,000 29;800 962,200 for water infrastructure. imoroverii.eiits
313 GV4 East Soen~n',Town~ot 100,000 800 3.000 96.200 for walerand sewer rehabilitation p~t
586 GRM WashinatonCoUnlV. 500;000 4,000 ' - 14,900 481,100 sewer.imorovemenls ..
587 QDVV MoOresville, Ciiy:cJf 600,000 4;800 . 17;900 577,300 for water infrastructure lnlprovemel1lS
18 t$t 7,760;OPO 62,200 - 231.900 7,485,900
South Carolina. . .
370 GWQ Lake, qty of 250,()b0 2,O~ 70400 240.600 for water andwaslewaler infl3Stri,JCtute
. imorovementS '
Mount PleasahlWatenNor'ks fortheMQunl Pleasant WalerWi;jl'ksRurat
371 OM 150;000 1.200 4,~ 144.300 ~:~s Gravity' Wa$tEl\'lf.lterExt~!cm
P eel ....
qqx... Myrtle 8eachQoWOtow.ri 500, t'lOO 4,QQO. . for a ri.ew storm water drainag,e. system
372 Redevefoort,,jnl..COrndr.ltion. 14;!lQ() 481,100
373 GPC 1'0WI"IS of Olarand:G6van -c- 750.000 6,000 ... 22,300 721,700 fOr water infrastrUcture iiTlOrovemElnl$
374 GRE Wellfortl. Cityot: 300,000- 2,400 . 8.900 288,700 for seWerlWastewat(lrlnrrastructiJi'e.
. .. - imai'ovements
375 c,;wR CheSler County~wer DistJict 400,000 3.200 11 ,9(lQ ;384,90Q for wasl~ter infraslructure.lmprQ"IernenlS
in Lando . .
376 GPD . RIdQeland, Towriof 200,000 1,600 &;000 19204.00 for the WiiCiOn Branch Water Project
628 GYM Char1eston~- 250;000 2,000 7,400 240,600 for a Wastewater Tunnel Replacement
. Proi~ .
Keishaw COUnty Kershaw.for thEll-20 Corridor Infrastructuil!
629 ~RY 250,000 2,000 7,400 240.600 projeei-WasteWater Trea~t Piant
ExoanSion .
630 GYQ Chester Sewer Dis.bict 600.000 6.4l5cl 23,BOO 769,600 for waler and waslewater infrastructure
improvements
631 QWe Kershaw County 1,000,000 8,000 29,800 962,200 for wastewater infrastructure improvements
11 total 4,850,000 38,800 144,300 4.666 900
Tennessee .
377 QP9 Franklin, City of . 125,000 1,000 3,800 120,200 for water syslem improvements 10 the
Watson Branch Watershed
Pikeville, City of for the Pi keville/Bledsoe County Water .
378 GWS 150,000 1.200 4,500 144,300 Improvemenls Proiect
Hampton Utility District In Ultle for waler inlrastructur(l improvements
379 GWW Milligan/Fish Springs Community. 125.000 1,000 3,700 120,300
Caner County
STAG FY 05 List Final revised 2.xLS
9
380 GGE Tusculum. City of 125,000 1,000 3,700 120.300 for first construction pnase Or a wastewater
treatment plant
381 GWV Bean Station. Citv of 50,000 400 1,500 48,100 lor wastewater in1rastructure imorovements
382 GPI Roane County 100,000 800 3,000 96.200 for water infrastructure imorovements
383 GPK SorinQ City 200,000 1,600 6,000 192,400 for water and sewer line replacement
384 GWU Anderson County 250,000 2;000 7,400 240,600 for water infrastructure improvements
385 GPH Davlon, City of 400,000 3.200 11,900 384,900 lor flocculalionand settling basins
637 GFl.U Pikeville, and Bledsoe County, 750,000 6,000 22,300 721,700 lor water infrastructure Improvements
City 01 Pikeville
638 DEP Warauga River Regional Water 500,OClO 4,000 14.900 481,100 lorplanning and construction of regional
Authority, Carter County water infrastructure facilities
639 GRW Walden's Ridge Watel' System. 750,ClOO 6.000 22,300 721.700 for wa terinfrastructure improvements.
Hamilton County
12 total 3,525,000 28,200 105,000 3,391,800
162 Region 4 Totals 67,885,000 543,000 2,021,2()0 65,320,800 ,
t ;(~1;;fi!f~u~~~~~~~~: E~9Jj);iJ.~::~.~~tn>jif:i~S'~~1'~~:i ~Atjjt{~tf;~l~ ~~~~t~;j~ ~{~~.~t~r1~~~ 1>!f.t~i1;~1~;:i.;~;(i;:t -~:;~~~~!~Jtf~'~.'~~'i';1~~:~~'~~~Lg~~}mjli~tt~~~~~
lIIinois .
152 GM4 Lockport, City of 1SO,oO(} 1,200 4.6,00 144,200 lor water and wastewater infrastructure
improvements
153 A2T Johnsburo, Villaoeof 450.000 3,600 13,400 433,000 for wastewater infrastructure imorovemerits
154 01/4 Lake County Storm water. 300,ClOO 2,400 8,900 288,700 for the Lake County Watershed Plan hLake
Management CommunitY Col,Jntv .
155 GVC. Silvis, Cftv Of 200.000 1,600 6,000 192,400 for water infrastructure irriOrDVements
156 GI,fB Newark, Villaae of 200.000: 1,600 6,000 192,400 for wastewater infrastnlcture imllrov~rilents
157 GM6 Paw Paw. 200,000 1,600 0,000 192,400 fOr cOnstruction of an elevated.Water
~orngel~ .. .
158 ~VD Annawan, ViUageof 200,000 1,600 6,qOO 192,400 10rwaterand wastewater infrastructure
imorovements
159 G:r6 Salt Creek Sanitary District iti 650,000 5,200 19,400 625,400 for water.and wastewater infrastri.ic1ui'Ef
Villa Park improvements . . .
160 GM5 Villa.oeof EaSt HazelCresl 300,000 2,400 8.900 288,700 for water infrastructure iinomvements ..,
161 GVE LexinQton, Citv of 200,000 1,600 6,000 192,400 for wastewater Infrastructure imorOvel'l'ierrts..
162 A90 Lake County 400,000 3,200 11,900 384 ,900 for wastewater infrastructure impm~nts.
on the Des Plaines River ...
163. OU6 Peoria, Cltvof --:. SOO,Ooo 4,000 14',900 481;100 for stormwaler manaoement
1~ 9fvt9 Bartonville. ViI\;Igeof s42;5<J~ 4,300 16,200 522,000 for stonnsewer Improvements ii1
8roadmpor Heiohts .
165 GIVl6 Arenzvme Villaoeof 500 000 4,000 14;800 481.200 for water infrastructure imorovemei'itlf, .....
166 GVF Aroenta, Villaoe of. 500;000 4.000 14,800 481.200 for water infrastructure imtfrovemetlts' . ,'.
167 GM7 North Pekin, Villaoe:of 500,000 4,000 14,BOO 481,200 for water infrastructure iniDroVe~ms' .. .....~
168 GVH SDTiilQ Valle..., Citv af 357;500 2,900 . 10,700 343,900 for..vater infrastruCtureirnoroven;ents
169 QV~ Viroinla. CII'fof 250.000 2.000 . 7)~00 .240.600 for water infrastructure ImorovelTients
170 GVG Pekin. City of 500,000 4;000 14;900 481,100 wasteWater infrastruCturefmorevemellts
171 QXN lincOln, Cily'Of 250;0ciQ 2,000 7;4Q() 240,600 to repair and slip line PulaSki sueets~
line . ... ...
172 ORB La Granoe, ViUi'loe of . 350,000 2,800 10'1.00. 336,800 ror water Infrastructure imnro\remeiits"
173 ClSN Fox River Grove; Village of 550,O()() 4,400 16,400 529,200 fQf Phase tlsewer plantlnfrasWCture
improvemerits' . . ... .
174 QXY ShelbWille, City Of 250;000 2.000 7;400 240;600 for wastewater infrastructure imofOvemehtS
17S QMY Breese,Citv of ..... 250..000 2,000 7APo. 240 600 for eonstri.icti6n or the. Breese Wa~rPJai'lt
J7& GMS Mazon Villaoe of 100.;0.00 800 3000 .. 96,200 for water infrastructure Imnrovemerils ..
11T 'GMA Win County 2OO,~bO .. for the. feasibility study for sariitaiycrlSlriCt
, 1,600 6,000 192,400 exoanslOn ..
493 9$S Effingham. Citym . 500;POq 4,000. 14.900 481,10.0. for drinking water infrastructure
.. imorcivements
494 OPA Monmouth. Citv of 500;0.00 4,000 14 ;900. 481,100 for wastewater inftastructureirobro\iemerils,
4.95 GaL Olvmoia Fiel(ls, VillaoEiof 500;000 4,000 14,90b 481;100 for wastewater InfrastrUcture lniprciVements
496 GDF Franklin Part<.; Village of 500,000 4,000 14;800 481,200 for waterand wastewater:infrastruc:ture' c.
imorov(lm(lnls ' ..
3010tal 10.,850,000 86 800 323;10.0 10,440 100.
Indiana
Manon, City of for water inlrastructure imprriveglents
H8 GVJ. 300;000 ' 2,400 . .8;900 288,700 associated with the Water Loop project iTr
Grant County
Cra.,.lford, City of for the design and construction pt)ase$ Of
179 GMD 200.000 1,600. 6,0.00 192,400 the Crawfordsville Eastside Sanitary sewer
P reject
180 GVL Frankfort, City of 500,000 4,000 14,900 481,100 for construction or the Easlsida
DrainaoeJDetention Facility
181 GME Indianapolis, City or 150,000 1;20.0. 4,50.0 144,300 for sewer rehabilitation in northeast
Indianapolis . .
182 r>.WB Evansville, City of 300,000 2,400 B,900 282,700 for the Pioe6n Cr~k Enhancement Proiaet
STAG FY 05 List Final revised 2XLS
10
183 GVK New CasUe, City of 200,000 1.600 6.000 192,400 for the sanitary sewer and sanitary
forcemain proiect
184 GMC Lowell. City of 330,000 2,600 9,900 3-17 ,500 for construction of additional waterlines.
185 GVN Hebron, City of 400,000 3,200 12,000 384.800 for water infrastructure imoroveml;ln(S
497 GSR Marion, City of 1,000,000 8,000 29,800 962,200 for the Marion Water Loop and Deer Creek
Project
498 GOO Southport, City of 100,000 800 3,000 96,200 for downtown infrastructure and drainage
Southport/Marion. County improvements
10 total 3,480,000 27,800 1 0~,900 3,348,300
MlchlClan
227 AK9 Wayne County 900,000 7,200 26,800 866,000 for the Rouge River National Wet Weather
Demonstration Proiect
228 ASX Gr,lOd RaDids, City of 500,000 4.000 14,900 481,100 for combined sewer overflows.
229 OF\' Genesee County Drain 250.000 2,000 7.400 240,600 for the Northeast Relief Sewer/KearsJey
Commission Creek Interceotor oroiecl in Genesee.
230 GMU Detroit, City of 350,000 2.BOO 10,400 336,BOO for the Woodmere Sewage Pump Sta.tion
Rehabilitation .
231 oaz Oakland County Drain 1 ,000,000 8,000 29,800 .962.200 for Evergreen-Fannington SanitarY seWer
Commissicin OVerflow control project in Farriiriiatoo Hms
Oakland County Diain for Footing Drain/Sewer Lead EXCB~S Flow
232 GSW Commission 500,000 4.000 14,900 481,100 Prevention demonstration.projeCtiri
Waterford
Oakland County to identify and eliminate sewage
233 GM)' 200,000 1,600 6,000 192,400 contributions from older urban areas~ the
Clinton River . .
234 G\fX Westland, City of 200,000 1.600 6,000 192,400 for water infrastructure imorovements ....
235 GMY Macomb County and St Clair 650,000 5.200 19,300 625,500 to implement a comprehensive watllr quality
Co~_ monitorirlCl OTlXlram
236 GMT BiiOiiton Townshio 300.000 2.400 8;900 288,700 for a watertineconstruction
Livin9ston County Drain --,- for drain constniction In Llvingston{~Q(Jrity.
237 GTE Commission 300,000 2,400 8;900 288,700
GVW L'Ansa Tuwnshlp . 250,000 2.000 7;4po 240.600 for water and seWer lritral>WctUre
238 improvements .
533 GFD. BenionH;',oor,. Cltvof 1,000.000 8,000 29,800 962,200 for waler Infrastructure imorovements.
534 GOZ S~!",yT~nshio ' . 500;000 4,000 14,900 481,100 for sewer infrastruclure improvements
535 QOJ s"d"il,"., C.it\1O( 500,000 4,000 14,900 481;100 for sewer infrastructure imorovements
536 ~R3 Mt1l':bmllCourlly Depar1ll1entcof . . 1.000,000 8,009 29;800 962,200 for sewer Infrastructure improvements
PubfitW;;!'ks
16 t<;.tal 1'1,400,000 67,200 250;100 .8.082,700
.. Mhin~So[a : ..
1 239 GOO RosealJ, Citvof' .. -- . 250,000 2;000 7;400 ... 240,600 for storm water infrastnii:tuie linorovemehts
I 240 GH2 Mil!nea1.?lis Citvpr. 600 000 . 4c8001 17,900 577 ,300 for the combined sewer oVerflow -.
Minnf;sota Slate:UniVeciil}t1il 150,000 1.2IlQ 4,600 ." for waler infrastructure improYemeri~
537 GXZ Moolhead 144.200
538 GRZ Diiiliih:-:::;<;v.Qf... 300,000 2AOO 8;900 288,700 for waslewaterinfrastructure .Imcroveinents
539 GH2 Mir!L~if?ir',Citvof. .... 300;000 2,400 8,900 ... 288.700 for combined sewer overflOYiilJiorovementS
Duluth andWeStamJ;a,1t8 for w8$tewater irifrastructureJrfJProvEirjl!)nts
540 G)'1 supcoo'Sanitary.ril$tiieiiO 250.000 . 2,O(j() 7,400 240,600
D\liUi.h.. CIty of ,.
6tOtii 1,850,000 14i8OO 55; tOO 1,780100
Ohio -.
315 .eWE Loraln;1;ltvof . 150,000 1 ;200 4,500 144,300 for wastewciter infrastniClure.imcrovements
316 GNO BUllerCOlIotV . .. 150,000 1,200 4;500 144,300 for the Buller Countv Waterline
317 GNO North l~ltirriore, ViHage:Of 300,000 2,400 8.909 2&8,700 for the Water Street eombined~~~~( .
Separatlon ProieCt .
318 GWF Hick~me, Village of 300.000 2,400 8;900 288.700 for!hl;l Hicksville WastewaterT~ynimt
- Plant Proiect . .. .. .. ..
. 319. GNS Def:an~. City of. . 300,000 2,400 .. 8,900 288,700 for the Sewer Seoara.lion Proiec:f
320 .GWD Circleiliiie, Citvof 750,000 6,000 22;300 721,700 for sewer infrastructure ImOrOVElrl\ents
321 Gti'r' Burr OakRegiQrlal Water Dlstril::f 1.000.000 8;000 - 29.80Q 962,200 for water lnfrastructurlt improvements in
.. Peirv County . .
322 O$G Gr~e;:~9 Ccunty 550.000 4,400 16,400 529,200 for water and wastewater infrasb1Jcture
. . improvements .
323 GNV Legall SIlO School District . for water infrastructure improvements in
50.000 400 1.509 48,100 Circlevine . .
324 GNT Lanca,stcr Gampus of Ohio 220.000 1.800 6;600 211,600 for water infrastructure improvements in
University Lancaster
325 GWG F alrtield ::;ounty 155,000 1,200 4,700 149,100 for water and wastewater infrastruCture
improvements
326 AQO Northeast Ohio Regfonal $B'Ner 350,000 2,800 10,400 336,800 for the Easterly/Ooan. Bl'()Ok Walershoo
District Pollution Abatement PrOject . ..
327 AY7 Toledo, City of 1,000.000 8,000 29;800 962,200 for wet weather 1Iow and waste~.ter
infrastructure improvements .
::J28 GNX Ottawa County 1.000.000 8.000 29,800 962.200 for water infrastruclure imorovements
;,)29 GT4 SanduskY, City of 1,000,000 8,000 29,800 962,200 for wastewater infrastructure improvements
Sf AG FY 05 List Final revised 2XLS
11
330 GWH Ashtabula County 350,000 2;800 10,400 336,800 for the Rock Creek Village Waterline
Extension
3:31 AWa Jackson County 50,000 400 1,600 48,000 for water infrastructure inH:lrovements
332 GFB Guernsev CourilY 550,000 4.400 16,400 529,200 for a water line extension
333 GNW 51. Marv's Municipal Government 500,000 4,000 14 ;900 481,100 for wastewater infrastructure improvements
334 GNU Urbana University in Urb.ana 625,000 5,0.00 18,600 601.400 for storm drainage and water and sewer line
construction
335 OFD Delphos Municipal G.ovemment 500.000 4,acio 14,900 481,100 for the Tn-County regional water system in .
Oelphos
336 GE1 Metropolilan .Sewer District of 550,000 4,400 16,400 529,200 for the sanitary sewer overflow
GreaterCil'1clnnat! demonstration oroiect
337 GWJ Wooster; City of 500,000 4,000 14,900 481,100 for stormwaler infrastruct\Jl'e improvements
alono Beall A'l/e
338 GP5 Hayesville,Villalle of 500.000 4,000 14,900 481,106 for water and wastewater infrastructure
improvements
339 OR4 Canton,Cili :cif 500,000 4,000. 14.900 481,100 for water infrastructure imorbVements
340 GP2 Trumbull COUnty ;Sanitary 150,000 1,200 4,500 144,300 for installation of the Maplewood Parle. sewer
Enoineer. .. . system in Hubbard Townshln
341 ONZ Columbiana CQQntY 250.000 : 2;O{J0 7.400 240.600 forwaler infrastructure improvements to the
Buckeve Waler District
MuskingtimWatijrsh(ld . for lheAlwoodConrerence CenterWaler
593 GRJ ConE;enianCycDlStifct;~.rroI! 300,000 ;Z;4.00 .. 8;900 288,700 Treatment Plant Improvements.
Couotv .......
594 GYD Villaol;l ofRadne MelosCountv . 500,000 4,000 14,900 481;100 for water treatment plant ilTlProvemants
595 GRN Celina.CUYot 750.000 ..6;000 22,300 721,700 for the Water Treatrnimt Plan! Proiect
596 OE3 Akron,City~: 400,000 3;206 11,900 384,900 for Combined Sewer Ov(lrf\OW
Improvements Proiect
597 GYE Parma,C1!VOf. 300,000 2;400 8..900 288,700 for City Sewer Replacement Proiect
598 GRK DelianceGo!i(\ty~niriii~iol)ers. 200,OQO 1;~PP 6,000 1!l2,400 for Auglalze River Sewer Project
Defiani::earidP:ailldliiQ' COunties
599 GYF ..IeffeJsor:lc:pofltYWatera~ 175,000 1;4OQ 5,300 168,300 forCresMewlBelvedereSewer Project
Sew~rrijsiricl; JElfferSoiiCbimtY
Tn-County ~uralllV;!te(alld 1.400 for Tri-Gounty/Noble County Wa~!lf
600 GT5 ~~~~~:~~~ 175,000 5.300 168,300 Jntercooneet Project
601 Qf'D ~2~:~~tr~~r~ril.. 100.000 .. aOQ 3,006 96,200 for TrK:punly Regional Water System
Proiect .
602 GRP COmlng,ViUa~:Of 100,00\) 8QO... 3.000 96,200 forWastewaterSystem Improvements
ProjeCt
37 lo~1 15.300,OOQ .>122 400 ...... 45610.0 14,721 500
WisConsin .,,-
420 GX6. SunPrairil'l,CitIIor. 150,000 ':. .1;200 4,50tJ 144,300 for wastewater infrastructure Imorovements
AnUQo,City:i)t" .. 14,~:... 55,.100 for water and. wastewater infi'a$ti'uCtiire
421 GSU 1.850.000 1,780,10Q imorriVements
422 GPR Vesper. CitY.Of. 862,000 . 6;90q 25,700 829,400 for water :and wastewater infr:astit1cture
ImproveinehtS
Boyd, CitY,~f-: -...., for water anowastl;lwater inftastnlcture
423 GPY 1 ,500~aoo 12;00(] 44,600 1,443,400 lmprovemenls . . . . .
.......
424 GX5 scott; ToWri':c:iF. 100;OQO .. ..:...... ,:'600 ... 3,000 96,200 for wastewater infrastructure Improvements
425 aFl Rac~e,qty.9,f .. 200,Oqg 1J!iP!! ?9Q0 192,500 for w.;lterinfrastructureimproyements
Waukesha;q,t.ycJf.. . ..... '4;~ for syste~ plarlning and water
426 GX7 "..,,'. SOO ,000 14;900 4a1,100 infrastrlJctureli11proveinents
.. .. MI1\Y;lUkee':~ttopolitah 1,000.000 .. .. for sewer infrastructure lmpro'l/emerrts
665 AQ7 $eWi;irage Olsirlet ~~~O 29,600 962,200
666 OF1 RaCine: CitYOf'.. . 1,000.000 6;000 29,800 962,200 for water. infrastructure imorOvementsand
StJI)Pr;ii~,',~:pf . . . for water and wastewater inrras.tniCture
667 GZ1 ~OO,ooo .4;80Q 17,800 m ,400 improvements. ,. ..
.
1 0 total .". 7,7Q2,OOtJ .. 62~1QO 231100 7,4611,800
109 ReglonHPtliI$ 47;642,000 361;100: 1,41$.400 45.841,500
.
5f.~tr~~iJit~~~A~}1r~1i RT~~~~~~' ,f~f1liifL~ :-Jo<-..'ak~~::Z~~,,;':a::':'T.1~ ii~lJ:~:~#~~~~ !:~~~li ~~~~~~~~~~~~~l,'~f.~~
~~$~~
Arkansas
34 GKV Favelteville; CitvQf 250,000 2;000 7.400 240,600 for..water infrastructure lmorovements
35 GAY faulknerCoiinrypubUc, Facilities 250.00b 2,000 7.400 240.600 for Lake Conway sewer lmproverTlerits in
Board Faulkner County ,
462 OUC FortChafeeRedevelDPTTlent 600.000 4.800 17,800 577,400 for water infrastructure improver:nents
AUthoritv IiI earling/Fort Smith .
463 COM FayetteviUe,Ciryof 250;OQQ 2,000 7,400 240,500 for wastewater infrastructure Improvements
4 total 1,350,000 Hl,800 40,000 1,299,200
Louisiana
205 GGT Monroe. CitY of 150,000 1.200 4,500 144,300 for the Monroe Wastewater Improvement
Program in Monroe
206 GVR SlaOahler,.Village of 200,000 1,600 . G,OOo t92,400 for wastewater infrastructure improvements
207 AQ8 West Baton RCluae Parish 200.000 1;600 6,000 192,400 for wastewater infrastructure improvements
ST AG FY 05 List Final revised2.XLS
12
208 QMJ Shreveport, City of 250,000 2.000 7 ,~100 240,600 for the Municipal Waler Dislribution System"'
Backflow Prevention
209 GMP Shreveoort, CilVof 200.000 1,600 6,000 192.400 for watershed orotection ..
South Central Planning & for water and wastewater infrastructUre
210 GCZ Development Commission 500,000 4,000 14,900 481,100 improvements in New Iberia,St.Charles,
Morgan City, 51. Bernard ,milSt. James
211 QR3 Slidell, City of 250,000 2,000 7,400 240,600 forslonn water Infrastructure improvements
513 GQU Raoides Parish 600,000 4,800 17,900 577.300 for wastewater infrastructureimprovemenis..
514 QMZ St Charles Parish 400,000 3,200 11.900 384,900 for wastewater infrastructure .imoroilerTierils ..
515 AQ8. Jefferson Parish 406,000 3,200 11,900 384,900 for Water and wastewater infrastructiJre
improvements
516 GXU Bastroo, City of 400.000 3.200 11.900 . .384,900 for wastewater infrastructure improvements
517 QK7 Hammond, City of 400.000 3,200 11,900 384,900 for waStewater infrastructure imorovements .
G'X'I! Grand Isle, City of 3,200 .. for drinking water infrastructure
518 400,000 11,900 384,900 improvements
13 total 4,350,000 34,800 129,60~ 4.185600
. New Mlixleo
263 GNS. LOrtfsbul'Q, CilV of 100,000 800 3,000 96.200 for water infrastructure imorovemeots
264 eGG, .. Bavard, City of 100;000 800 3,000 '96.200 for theFt Bavard EffliJenlReuSe$vstei'n
265 001>'. Ruidoso Downs. City of .. '.".. 150;000. 1,200 . 4,500 . 144,300 for wastewater infraslructureimprovements
266 GHZ Elephant Butte., City of ... 150 ,000 1.200 4.500 ... 144,300 for wastewater Infrastructure improvements
267 A2Y losLunas, Citv of 150,000 1 ,200 4.500 144,300 to build a sewer interceptornoo. .
.268 AVK Esoanola,City of 150,000 . 1,200 4;400 144,400 for WastewaterinfrastrucMeJmptovenients:.
269 GW2 Tiieras, City of 200;000 1,600 6,000 . .. . 192;400 for water infrastructure imorovements
ito Avi< Bemafillo County 20ci,OOO 1,600 6,000 192,400 for the SoiJth and NoM ~terl1i1d
wastewater Infrastructure improvements
57t AVK Albuquerque and County Of 1,600,O()0. 12,800 47,600 1.,~9,600 for the Valley Utilities ProjeCt
" Bemalnlo; City cif
. Espanola, City of .. forwa\er and wastewater b"ealirient
579 AVt{ . 1.000,0Q0 a,ooo 29,800 . . . 962,200 i1:ifrastruclure . .
580 GRF KIrtland, City. .of 900,000 7,200 26~800 866,000 for Phase 1 of a sewer svstemoroiect
581 0$5 Los tunas. Villaae of 5000()() 4,000 .14.900 .. . 481,100 for' theinterceoWr sewer 6ne Ditlietl ..
~2 GRti, .. Clovis, City 1:11 250.000 2;000 7Ao() .,' 240,600 fOr wastewater infrastriJdill'eimproveinents
1.3 iOtaI 5,450;000 43;600 16~;400 5.244,000
Oklahoma
MarlOw, City of ., ..... for water and wastewater infrasliui:tui'a
~2 opE; 100;000 800 3;00Q ... ,%.200 lmorovenierils . ... - '. ... . ,
343 GP4 .: :Suloher, City of .~. 200;()()0 1,600. 6JlOO . :192;400 for wastewater infrastructure imorovemerns
344 ~5r " Seminole ,City of 1000 000 . MOO :29;800 ' . 962;200 for water iilfrastruttureJrTiptOlieinents.. ".
345 GNZ, Meeker, City of 80;000 . 600 2400.-..... 77 000 7 . . ...:. :... ..,
. Skiatook . ,..- f()r water ancheweclrifrastriJ~r~.
34& oWl< i00.Cpo .~ 3Jji)o 96,200 lfnorovements . .. ,
.._~~. .
. .5t~~t 1 ;480.(),ll0 . . U;800 44;200 1;424,000 :..
texas .:
3SS GWX,.. Houston, CilV of 150;000 1;200 4,500 144;300 for waterlnfr;3struCture Improvements,
387' GPL' .. UbertY Hili CilVaf ,. 250,000 2~000 7;400 240,600 for the Gehtral Citv 8eWilfSVSten'fPiPiecf . ..
.. ..'..
Brazos River AUthority .. ~,~i) .. fOr the 6i'azois!NavasOt2 Watershed' ,.
$~ Auf>. . . . ,. 75,000 600 7;1,100
.. .". ManaaementPrcileCtJn Fort~'nacd~ritV ..
....".. ..arazos RIver Authority fot.the West. Fort Bej'\(J. c;;oo!1ty.8ii9l9ii21
38~ 9.17' 100;000 800 MoO. $6,200 Water Treatment Facl1ityj!iFoit~
,... ... Coootv .. .... ... .....
390 0'17". .. Fort Bend Couhtv :1,.. 500,000 4,000 t4~900 ..' 481,100 for water infrastructure lriiorovemems
391; OGH- .. BosqUe County 350,000 2.800 10;400 ,. ... .336.800 fOr.Water InfrastrUctureimorovemeijtS . :'
392 GWY.. .. Weatherford, C'rtv of . 2?QiOOO 2,000 7,400 240.600 for water infrastructure iinPioYerTients
39~ GWZ Pharr, CiLVof .. .. 250.000 2,000 7AOO . 240.600 for wastewater infraStructure Imorovements
394 GPN: . Alvin. City of ...... 150;000 1,200 4,500 .. 144.300 for Water InfraStruCture:iil'iorovemeofs..
395 aVN E1 Paso Waler. Utilities 250;000 2,000 7,400 24{),600 for'. Wateriitfrastructur9.eXpanslohlrt:.EI Pa$O.
G~~ San AntonioWalerSystem ,.. .. for the Espada Road Stiwerprcijlli;lm San.
396 15Q;0.<>> 1,200 4;51>0 144,300 Antonio ....
397 GEY Austin. City of .. 4, {)()() 14;900. 461,100 for lhe'non-strilcturalsartitarysewe,.
500,000 overflow preventIOn :Di'oiect ..:....: ..
.
MQ GRX San Antonio Water System 500,000 4,000 14.900 481,100 for;ti~lnttaStrticture lmprovenll€l!ts at.
Ken SA ..
64:1 GYtJ Lower Rio Grande Valley .. for thl;! lower RiO Grande MciriUo Drain
.. 650,000 5,200 19,300 625,500 RehabilltaliOn orotBci . .... ....
642 GRZ Canyon Lakes Water Reuse 800,000 6,400 23,800 769,800 for constru.ction related costsJolhe water
Project in lubbock system infrastructiJre . .
643 GSL AbUene Brekenridge ReselVt)li' 350,000 2,800 10AOO 336,800 fordrlnking water infrastructure
project In Abilene
644 GYT Pharr WastewaterCollecticin 400,000 3,200 11,900 384,900 to updatelf1e wastewatelsystem
System in Pharr infrastructure
645 GSN Brekenridoe, Citvof 300,000 2,400 9,000 288,600 wastewater and sewer infrasln.icture proiect
646 GSM Hillsboro. City of 500,000 4.000 14,900 481,100 wastewalerand sewer infrastructure Droiect
US-eM E1Paso for continuation of the deSalination and
5.000,000 40.000 0 4,960,000 water supply project
STAG FY 05 List Final revised2.XLS
13
US.M Brownsvllle 2,000,000 16.000 ,0 1,984,000 for the water supply project
21 total 13,475,000 107,800 192,800 13,174,400
56 Regior'l 6 Totlls 26,105,000 208,800 569,000 25,327,200
.
.'-- ,.;.. 'J'.:
'0", 'c.,,,
Iowa
186 GYM Des Moines, .Clty of 150,000 1,200 4,500 144,300 for storm water infrastructure improvements
to the Closes Creek Watershed
187 GMK Slonn Lake, CitY of 250,000 2,000 7,400 240.600 for water infrastructure imorovem(lnts
OXU Postville, City of 250,000 2,000. 7,400 240,600 for the completion of the Postville
188 wastewater facility
189 A7P Mason City,CityQf 500,000 4.000 14,900 481,100 for completion of the Mason City water
treatment plant
190 GVO Fl. Madison, City of 450,000 3,600 13,400 433,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure
improvements .
191 QA2 Ottumwa, City of 450,000 3,600 13.400 433,000 for the South Otlumwa Sewer Separation
loroiect
192 GMJ Davenoort. City,or ... 500,000 4,000 14,900 481,100 for the WestsideDiversionTunnel
499 GOQ Fort. Madison; CltV'Of 500,000 4,000 14,900 481,100 for the Waler Treatment Plant
500 GXR West Burlinglon,qity9f 500,000 4,000. 14,900 481,100 for the Iowa ArmY t\mmunilianPlailt
Improvemenis
501 OA2 Ottumwal. .citv.of 1,500,000 12,000 . 44,600 1.443.400 for the separation of combined sewers
502G05 Davenport, City.,of 500;000 4;000 14.900 481,100 for water Infrastructure. improvements
11 toiat 5,550,000 44 400 165,200 5,340,400
. Kansas
193 GT8 Mission. City of 250 ;000 2.00(l 7.400 240,600 for constrUcli6f) and expansion of aslorm
water flow r'n;;inaoementsystem
194 GVP Harper, Citvof 350,000 2.BOO 10,400 336,800 for water infrastructure imorovements
Abilene.Cily of . . 1,000,000 6;000'.. 29,800 for construction of a w,3Stewaterti'ecitinerit
503 OX5 962,200
-. . - planl
504 GHD Hutchlnson.C~,Of 1,500,000 12;000 44.600 1,443.400 for groundwater remedlalion an~ treatmenl
I projecls . .
4 tOtal 3,100,000 24800 92,200 2,983,000
MIssouri
245 QPZ Joplin. City Of 350;000 ~.B(iQ . 10,400 336,800 for the Crossroads Parallel S~1"hase4
UDorades . . .
SL louis.Cily!'lf ..... Deparbnen!o~ Public Utilitiell, fQj:the
24e Gte 200,000 1;600 6,000 192,400 Columbia J30tIorils Welllield.Pevelopment
water proieetinSt. louis .
247 GVZ Clarence CannoriWh61esale 250,000 2;000 .. 7,400 240,600 for w~terln~~ruclUre improvements in
Water Com~iOn ,. MonroeCo(m
248 GJF Duckett Creeltsaiiitani District. .. 250;000 2.000 7;400 . 240,600 for wastewater infrastructure Improvements
547. .GR7 KansasCilv . ........ 1 ;500;000 12.000 44.600 1.443,400 for wier .arid wastewater infrastrUCture
-.-.. .
Joplin, City of. ..... ",- for lhefinalp!'tase of tIleCi:OSSroaCls
548 QPZ 687;500 5.;~OO 20;601) 661,500 Paranel $e..veroroiect. ... ... -......
Milan, City of .. ..- for theMi~nWater Ouality-Tre;ili11en1
549 ~Y5 ;... 1.312.500 10;~Q 39,100 1,262.900
Proiect. .._
~:~~~~9.!~J" to elCpand tf)e.exisling Walerti'e;Jlfuent
C3paCity tr?1ll5 minion gallons1q1;Smill.ion
550 GR9 1,000,000 8,9PQ 29,000 962,200 gallons per;,day and. 10 il)Clude~i1ecting
the Mac:onq\)unty PI/VSD #.1. arid the City of
Welisvill~f to..tW.. CONiNe transmission
system
Envlronmerital..~\JrCe$ to millgate..point sollrce po11lltionlssues in
551 GY7 CoaBtlon .1;000,000 8;@. 2Q;80(l 962,200 disifEissEidcommunities thaf~r Table
Rock lake
Springfield. City:of for wastewater treatment pl;lnt
improvem~ts including lhede~ignand
552 GR8 1,000,000 8:000 29,80'0 962,200 construcli.oo OfInfrastrudure .foi' removal or
nitJ:ogenfi'pmthe trea.led waslawa.ter
Erlf1uent and i!llProved anaerobic (jigesler
.. facilities lhattreat solids from the
10 total 7,550,000 60,400 224;800 7,264,800
Nebraska
250 GN3 Uncoln, City of 300,000 2;400 8,900 288,700 for waler and wastewater inrrastructu.re
improvements
.251 QGU Omaha, Citvof 550,000 4;400 16,400 529.200 for lhl;! Combined Seweraol;! OVerflow
557 QGU Omaha, City of 900,000 7.200 26.800 666.000 for the ccinstruction of combined sewer
.. .. separation systems
558 GY8 Uncoln, City of 350;000 2,800 10,400 336,800 to upgrade the Theresa Slreeland
Northeast Wastewater Treatment olants
4fobl 2,100,000 16;800 &2,500 2,02D,7DO
29 Region 7 Totals 18,300,000 146,400 544;700 17,608,900
STAG FY 05 List Final reVised 2.XLS
14
I
~~gICil:t;8'\;~H~fJi\'if?i:", ., .,;..,. .,. ;~:~~:~:~~~:~~';i~~i;:3."~i . ;., 'if..;,....'
..;, ..... '..'. ...".. .,,;.;..'.',!..'
Colorado
90 GlIU Jefferson County 250.,0.00 2,0.00. 7,400 240.,60.0 to implement a new storm water
improvement orooram
91 GUV Ouray. Cilv of 250,0.0.0. 2,0.00 7,40.0 240,600 for water infrastructure imorovements:
471 GXK Trinidad, City of 300,000 2.40.0. 8,900 288,700 for the Trinidad Wastewater' Improvement
Project
472 GOF Ba\lflEild: Town of 250,0.00 2,00.0. 7,400. 240,600. for the construction of a water storaoetank
473 GQH Mancos Water Conservancy 250,0.0.0 2,000 7,400. 240.,60.0. for water supplyfacilily renovation
District .
474 GXL.. Idaho$orinos, Town of' 250.,0.00 2,000. 7,400. 240.,60.0 for water distribution facility renovaticin
475 GQJ Eldcira'dci SorlrlOs, Town of 2SO,o.o.o. 2;0.0.0. . 7,40.0. 240..60.0. for imorovino wastewaler treatment
476 GUV Ouray 950.,0.0.0 7,60.0 28,400 914.0.0.0. for water infrastructure imorovements
471 GXM J.effefs6n COunly 250,0.00 2.0.0.0. 7,400 240,60.0 for stormwater coJlection system
improvements
9 total 3,00.0,0.00 24,00.0 89;100 2;886,90.0.
Montana
249 GN1. RoS.odYri Corporation in Butte 150,000. 1,200. .4;SOO 144;30.0. for a waste recovery lrommunicipal waste
treatmenlolant .. .. . '.' '-'..'
553 GY6 B04l;llrian. City of 1,0.00,0.00 8,00.0 29,800 962,200. for water infrastructure improvements
554 QW3 MiSsquriRiWr' Water Project, 1 ,OOO,O()() 8;000. .29.800 962,200 fora water treatment project
~erena
555 GRD GiasocJW, Ciiv of 500 COO 4.000 " 14,800 481,200 for water Infrastructure imorovementS. .
556 Gn SeelEivllll<eseWer Dislrict 750,00.0 6;000. 22.30.0 721;700 for wastewater InfrastructureimptOvetnents
5tb~.1 -. 3,4o.O,o.AA 27 20.0. 101.20.0 3,271.600
. North,Dal(Ota:
314 GFX . DevilsJ;ilke,Cilv of 150;OQQ 1.200. 4.500 .1044;300 for the Devils !-aka wataf lin.e
588 OHF Gf.;ifton; Citvof . 1,000 OOQ 8.000 29,800 962200 for the Grafton Water Treall'rientPlant
589 GFX Dev~s. uike;CitVof 500,000 4;000 14;BOO 481,200. for water infrastructure impr:ovemerits
590. .OWE Rlv.erdale City of 250.000 2,000 7A.00 240,60.0 for the RemonalWater Tr6atmentfaClIitv' ..
591 GGM .... DlCkl!y.RuraIWater lJsers 250,OOg 2.000 MOO. ~40;6OQ fei' the Southeast Re9ionalExpanslOil
.. ASsoCiation InSoutheasv Proiect ..
592 GRl . Mandari,Cily Of 25Mt>p 2~OOO 7.400 140;600 for drinking watei' infrastrUcture
. improvements
:6tbtiJl 2,400,OQ() 1!j;~()O 71 ;300 2,309,500
. SciUtht)akota CC'
631 A2F... l;hii'ciiJ;:eitv Of 1,500.000 12;00Q 44.600 1A43,40o. for waterinfras.tructure improvements
63.3 GYP. Gr'eenNallevSailitarv Dislrlct. 600,0.0.01 4;800 17.800 577,400 for:water infrastructure imorovements...
634. GRV: Tvnoat, CitVbf 400,000 3.200 12;000 38'tSOO for water infraSti'ucture imbtoYemelifs :,
635 GYR ,.; Milbarik .. 300;000 2;40.0. 8;900. 288;700 for waslewaterinfra.structiJrehnprovemenlS
6~..~h .' !)i~t9n 30.0 ,OO() ,. 2:400 .8;900 :2ea,700 for.stoImwalerimprovenients
, Wvominu 3,100;000 24;80() 92:200 2.983;000
..
I 4431GOO .. .. cneverine, City of 350.000 2;800 10;400. ~36;8oo for wastewater infraslructurelmDrov.ementS
1~r' 35O,OOQ 2;800 10;4P0 336;800 .
., ..ti~h : ~ ..
. ,..... Lqgari:City. .. forWPter and wast(lWaterinfrasl!\JC;lQre'
.:."'":)
;lQ& <3eq: 150 .1)00 1.:;100 :4;509 .144.300 Jmprovementsfor Phase I andJiof.the
... .. .. ... . Northwest parlcl='roject .. .... ..
..... .. JiC)l~~!iY~Cil:Yor = for water infraslfucture fniprovemeDts. .
,
652 GSK 3OO,Q(lQ 2,400 8,900 2Ba;700 ;=:~ with the Wa~$toffl1t>r.l'o
..:.
~gD!lWater Comp lint an. " for.water infrastruCture ilriprPVerriEi~ .... ..
653 'GYw 'ri!provemel1t District, Magna 500,000 4.000 14;800. 481,200 assbclated with the pei'Ch/Orale& arserilc.
. treaiment D~r1t
654 GSJ tooan.ClWor. 400;000 3.200 ~2;OOO 384,800 for water infraslnsCture imnT~vertlerlts
f>al1e'CItY . .. for waler infr.istructure in:ipt;OVeri'ielj{S.
655 QP~ 400,006 3,200 11,1)00 384;900 associated with the JUdge;3ndpiroTunnel .
., .- treaimento.~nt
656 GAg Rivertoo.cliV of 400,000 3;200. 12,000 384,BOO for Waler Infrastr1.lcture ini6fovertlents
651 13.01 Otem;CitV,CIf' 400,000 3,200 .. 12~000. 384,800 for Yiaterinfrasttvcture iriji:lrO\lemenlS' . . .
~ao Valley Water . for the GroundWater Extraction and
6Sl3 aG6 ConServancY District 100.000 800 3,000 96,200 Treatment Remedial oroiect. .
659 QHD ~ndY CitY 1,000.000 8,000 29.80.0. ~,2o.O for drinking Yiater and sl6tmWater
. infrastructure imDroverrienls
S total 3,&50,000 29,200 108.900 3,511;900
35 Regjo.i18 Totals 15,900..000 127200 473,1tlO 15,299,700
'~': ..-.~, r~~i)l~;,~tt~~lfL.:rf.1:~~~?:~ <~::.:\~ ri~:~: --- ~': -.':_"',:_~ :;~ _'~!~~s~t~~~~:~i ~~~~~~:f~~~~5, ~:~~~~i:t~~~~,;l~;t eo.',," .:"0.'.., C,"..
.... .... .'-. ,..,>,
AtJ:z:ona
I 3fj!QRM Goodvear.CllV of 200.000 1.600 6;000 192.400 or waler infrastructure imorovemelits
I nlOJo Avoodale, .city of 250,0.00 2.0.00 7,40.0 240.600 for wastewater infrastructure improvements
STAG FY 05 Lisl Final revised 2.xLS
15
18 GUR Chandler, City of 150,000 1.200 4.500 144,300 for the Chandler Arsenic Mitioation Prooram
39 GL3 University of Arizona; College of 1.000.000 8,000 . 29.800 962 200 for the US-Mexico Border Environmental'
PharmacY ' Protection Prooram
40 QQ1 Stafford. City of 250,000 2,000 7.400 240600 for construction of awaslewaler treatmenl
, planl
41 GUQ SI. Johns, City of J 500,000 4.000 14.900 481 100 for new ~ater transmission pipeline
, construction
6 total 2,350,000 18,800 70,000 2,261,200
California
42 GUP Rialto, City of 150.000 1.200 4.500 144,300 for water infrastructure imorovements
Box Springs Mutual Waler for installation of a sewer system
43 GL2 Company of the City oiMoreno 250,000 2,000 7,400 240,600
Valley
44 GLS Oxnard, City of 200,0,00 1.600 6,000 192400 for the HeadworKs Expansion Project and
, Redwood Trunk Proiect
Modesto Project, City of for the neighborhood storm wat~r; s~r.
45 QH6 150,000 1,200 4,500 144,300 and water.infraslrudure project (NInth Street
Corridor Storm Drain Project)
46 QJ8 Orange County SanilationDistricl 600,000 4.800 17.900 577 300 !orwaste~ter infraswctlU'11 improvements
.. ' In FounlalO Valle .. .
47 GUS LOlOl,ma Beach, Citye! 500,000 4,000 14;900 481,100 for ernemencv sewer reoairs
48 GL4 Solana Beach, City Of 1,000.000 8,000 29;800 962 200 for wastewater treatment iinproverneilts in
. the municipal sewer svstern ..
49 GE5 Roseville, City of 250,000 2.000 7,400 240.600 for waterinfrastrudure irnoroveri'lerits
50 GUT Monrovia. City of 400;000 3,200 11.901;> 384 900 !or water and wastewater infr.istru~
. Imorovement
51 AVN Cities afArcadia arnfSiOOa 1,000.000 8,000 29,000 962 200 for the J~nt Waler Infrastructure
Madre, . Restoration Prooram
52 GEF . City of East Palo Alto 200,000 1,600 6;0(>0 192 400 !or th.e storm water infrastructUre
, Imorovernents ... .
53 QXA Monterey COunty water 3M.OOO 2,800 10,46<1 336 800 for the Salinas Valley Water Projeclii'i
Resource AQencv ' Monterev Countv
54A9VV Sweetwater Authority 100;000 800 3,000 96200 for the water quality monitoring In Chula
'Vjs~ . .
55 GKS EISegundo 250,000 2.000 7;400 240 600 for wastewater infrastructure improvements
, foT SmokY Hollow .. .
56. QHO Reddino, Citv of 350.000 2 BOO 10,400 336,800 fcir water infrastructureimorovemerits
57 GDA San Diego County Water. 750;000 6,000 22,3(1) 721 700 for the County Water AulhorityRe!1~'
Authoritv . Seawater Oesannalion lnitlativem.S.in
58 0$0 Brisbane, City of 350,000 2,8QO 10.466 336 800 for water and wastewater InfrastrUctun!
, Improvements
59Gl6 Bi9hom Desert Wi:Jte~Agilncy 100;000 . BOO 3,000 96 200 for water infrastructure improvements'm
'YuccaVallev ..
60QA Y San Bernardino. CitY of 450,000 3..600 13:400 433,000 for Lakes and Stream Proi.ect
61 .QHY Hesperia, Citvof 250,000 . 2,000 7.400 240;600 for watednfraslructure Imorovemenls
62 GZN \,..3ke ArrQwhead...CitYot 200,000 1600 6,000 192,400 for the Communitv Services Distrid"
Mission Springs Wa~DisW:t. 500,000 for the Groundwater ProtectiOi'!,'S!lPP!Y ,
63 A31 4,000 14,900 . 481,100 Enhancement/Reuse Program. I" ~Sei1Hol
Sorina5 ... . .. .. .. .
64 GL7 Bannino, Citv of. 450,000 3.600 13.400 433,000 for the Brinton Reservoir
65~ Hi-Desert Water DistriCt In Yucca. 300.000 2.400 8;900. 288.700 for the Warren Vall!!y Recharge Facil,it)t .
Vallev .. , ... ...
66 .~LA Santa ~aWaters~Pl'Ojed 300.000 2,400 8,900 288 700 for the Santa Aria RegionaUi1te~tor
AuthorilV. : . (SARI) Enhancement .. .
67 $l9 San Jose, City of 200,Q()0 1,600 6,000 192 400 !or water and wastewater inf~stnJc;tiite.
. iirnoroveml;lnls ..
68 005 Saciamento. CitY of 500.000 4.000 . 14;900 481100 for combined sewl;lrsystemimpro:Venl~t'
. . . , rehabilitalionproiect
.69 GJE Caslaic Lake WaterAliencv 250.000 2,000 7;400 240,600 for waslewater infrastructure improvements
70 Gz6 Barstow, City'of 250.000 2,000 MOO 240 600 for a sewer master plan implementation
. . loroted
71 QH9 VictorviUe, Citv of 250,000 2,000 7 ;400 .240.600 for water infrastructure imoroVemenlS
. California State Univl;li'sity. 19~ 400 for the C(l~1et for Urban Environmental
72GZE 200;000 1,600 5.090
DominoUez Hills . ' Research In Carson .
73QIA Brea. CilV of 200,000 1,QOO 6;000 192.400 for sewer infrastructure imoroveri1erits
74 GLC Mission VieJO, Citvof 200,000 1.600 6.000 192,400 for the Oso .creek Barrier Proiecl
75 AX8 Vallejo, City of 300.000 2,400 8,900 288 700 for the Mare Island Sanitary sewer arid
, Stonm Drain Improvement Project
76 GL8 Norwalk, CilV of 250;000 2.000 7,400 240.600 for the Balancino FaciliN Pro'ed
nGL8 Strathmore Public UtilitvDistrid 150,000 1.200 4.S00 144.300 for a wastewater treatment Plant.
78 QVJ Folsom, City of :250.000 2,000 7,400 240,600 for the sewl;lr rehabilitationDmfect
79 QLF San Francisco, City of 1.000,000 8, ()()(l 29.BOO 952,200 ~or water and wastewat(lf infrastructure
Improvements
80 GC4 Santa Clara Valley Water Dislricl 800,000 6.400 23,BOO 769 800 In Santa Clara Countyfor Perchlorate
. Cleanup .
STAG FY 05 List Fina' revised2.Xl.S
16
81 GER Westminster, City of 200,000 1,600 6,000 192,400 for the Westminster Water Quality Pilot
Proiect .
82 GLF Huntington Beach, City of 300,000 2,400 8,900 288,700 for !he Winlersberg Channel UrbanRi.ln-Off
Treatment
83 GLG Downe.... City of 250.000 .2,000 7,400 240,600 for storm water infrastructure improvements
84 GZ7 Municipal Waler District of 150,000 1,200 4,500 144.300 lor an Orange County water reliability study
OranQe County .
85 GLH Orange County Sanitation District 200,000 1,600 6,000 192,400 lor a new secondary treatment facility in
Fountain Vallev
86 QIZ Eurka, CilV of 250,000 2.000 7,400 240,600 for the Martin Slouch Interceotor
Gardena, City of 250,000 2.000 7,400 240,600 for water and wastewater infrastructure
87 GHL improvements
88 GAA Santa Monica. CTIYof 250,000 2,000 7,400 240,600 lor water infrastructure improvements
. Sonoma County for the Monte Rio sanitation project in Monte
89 GLE 200,000 1.600 6,000 192.400 Rio ..
464 GC4 Sanla Clara Vallev Water .Oistrict 300.000 2.400 8.900 288.700 for oerchlorate Qroundwater dean-uD
Inland Empire Perchlorate Task . for the Wellhead Treatment of Perchlorate
46$ GJZ Force 300,000 2,400 8,900 288,700 Contaminated Wells
466 GXH Santa Ana, Citv of 400,000 3,200 11,900 384.900 for East and West Reservoir Uooracles
San Jose, City of .. 14,900 481,100 for North San Pedro waler and sewer
467 GOE - 500.000 4,000 infrastructure imoroveml;lnls
468 OIZ Eureka. Citvof 500.000 4,000 14,900 481,100 for the MartinSlouah Interceptor Proieel
Metropolitan Watl;lrOistriCtof . for the. City of Ontario Final Design for
469 GXJ Southem California 200,000 1,600 6.000 192,400 Wellhead Treatment for Perchloi"ate and
Nitrate
470 OIB Laguna Beach. City of 400,000 3.200 11.900 384,900 for wastewater infrastructure improvements.
snob I 18,850.000 150800 561,200 18.13.8,000
Gu;;n'1
146 OHW Guam Waterworks;Authority 250,000 2,000 7,400 240,600 for water and wastewater infrastructure
-. improvements
1totaJ 250,000 2,000 . 7,MlO 240,600
Hawaii
147 ClUK Maul County Department of 150,000 1.200 4.506 144,300 tor the lead reduction in UpcountryM~lljiin
WaterSuoplv Uo~untryMaui .
48.9 GOM State of Hawaii 250,000 2;qf:)() 7,400 240,600 for upglC\de and expansion bftheSand
Island WastewalerTreatmenl Plant
$500,000 to the .COlinlY:of HawaU for wastewater infrastructureimprcivernenls
and $500, oooiolJl!lHQl@ilg 1,000.000 u 29;800
49.0 QHS and COmmunity Development ll,OO<J 962.200
COrporation. of Hawaii,
3.lolal 1,400,000. - .-11.2QO 4170Q 1.3471QO
Nevada
I 252 AT? Fallon. CitY.Of 400.000 .' 3.200 11,900 384,900 for wastewater infra,structurelnllirovemenls
253 AWl Henderson, Citv'of .,.. 400,000 . 3;200 ' . 11,900 384,900 forwastewater infrastructureimoroveriieritS
559 GRA Las Vegas Val~yW~l?i' .., 400,000 3,2.@ 11 ,900 384,900 for water.infrastructure.impri:Wement,S
DistrictJSearchUatit: ...
S60 GEM Clark County ReClarnaliori 400,000 3;~~ '- . 11,900 384,900 for waslewater infrastructure imprOvements
Dislrictlsearchlidhi'.- .....- . :
56} ORB Reno, Citv of' 250;000 2;000 7;400 240,600 for sewer InfrastructureimprovernentS
562 COW Soanlsll SorInas .. 300.000 c_. 2400 8,000 288,700 tor the. Nitrate Rerricival Project:
Notth Valley LeiJlmoo~1i::iaI: ., ...... for water lnfraslruclufl;l improvements
5&3 ORC Recharge Proill<:tWNOi1h 200,000 1:@.. 6.000 192,400
Lemmon Vall8v . . ..... .... ' .
564 CrN Viroin VaHevWaterDistiic:t 250.000 2.000 r.' 7.400 240,600 for water infrastructure imnrovemel1ts
565. eNS Carson City 200,000 1,500 . 6,000 192,400 forreseivoir lininCI
'9 total 2,800,000 22400 83;300 2,694,300
74 Region 9 Totals 25,6~,00~ . . 205;200 763600 24,681,200
~ ..;. ,.
t~.~~~~-f:i~~!.f IBi9!~iil~JJi~~~~~~1j~~i] F.~~l1t~~~:..~ -,1 ,-~1~J~ ~:U!~.!.~:~_!~~ ~~~~l~~~:~~:<;.;:::-,~t4t;~{~J~j;~:~~~t~o!l~
.'f~.~~
.. ..
...
Alaska .;
452 CIK Girdwood, Inc. 1,000,000 8.000 29.800 962.200 for water and sewer eXDansion in Girdwood
453 Ga9 Municio<lfft\-' ofAncfiofciae, 1.300,000 10.400 38,700 1,250,900 for Sand Lake Waler EXtension
454 GaB Malanuska-SusilnaBOrouQh 300,000 2,400 8.900 286.700 for waler wellsfot Gorsuch Lake
455 QIO W3silla, CiiYof 1.100.000 8,800 32,700 1,058,500 for sewer exoans1on
456 AY8 Valdez. City of 750,000 6,000 22,400 721,600 to replace septic systems with sewers and
wells with city waw
457 QIJ Ketchikan,CilV of 400.000 3,200 11.900 384,900 for Mountain Point Sewer Svslem
458 GOG Skaqway, citY of 250,000 2;000 7.600 240,400 for water system uoorades
459 OOF Wranqell i Cllv or 425.000 3,400 12,600 409,000 for water and sewer UOQrades
460 GOA Nome. City of 800,000 6;400 23,800 769.800 for water and sewer upgrades for()1d
Federal Building
461 GWT Setdovia, City of 600,000 4,800 17,900 577 ,300 for water and sewer upgrades
10 -total 6,925,000 55,400 :206.300 b,6G3,300
~
8T AG FY 05 List Final revised 2,XLS
148 GVA
149 GVA
150 GV9
151 GM3
491 A2S
492 GXQ
6 total
347 GP3
348 GWN
349 GP1
350 GP9
351 GWM
~3 (:lUG
604 GRS
605 GYH
606GP9
I 607 GRQ
I 608 GWM
11 total
413 GPU
414 QUS
415 GPS
416 GPT
417 GX4
418 GPT
--,-
419 OX1
660 GYX
661 GYV
662 GSP
663 .GSO
1.
I
6691
CasUeford, ciiV of
Caslleford, CWof
Twin FallS, Citvof
Pocateno, .citY of
Burley, City of
Pocatello, Citytif
OreQon
Portland, City of
Sweet Home, City of
Salem, .city of
Klamath Falls City of
Rainier, City .of
Warrenlon. City of
Rainier, Citvof
CoouOle, City or
Klamath Falls
Coburo; Citvof
Rainle(;Cilyof
Washlnnton
Chehalis, CitV of
Tacoma, city Of
Carson. ClIvof
Oak HarborCiNof
Uniontown. Town of
lone. TOwner.
Lake\YOOd.Cilyof
Battle Ground,GltVof..
Port ofWallaWaHa .
Kennewi~,..Cio/'Of .
..
Skamaril.8 County f'ubl~ Utilities
Oistrictln Carse" ..
Squaxin IslahdTri~;in ShE1/kl1l
.
HQ Total
: .
National. Totals
STAG FY 05 List Final revised 2.XLS
200,000 1,600
450,000 3,600
600,000 4,800
750,000 6,000
2,000,000 16,000
1,000,000 8,{)00
5,000,000' 40,000
150;000 1,2OQ ...
150.000 1,200
150,000 1.20Q
200,000 1600
150.000 1 ,200
250,000 2.000
250,000 2.000
2SO.00Q 2,000 .
250.000 2,QOO
300,000 2.400
300,000 2,400
2,400,000 19.200
150,000 1jOD
1,000.000 8.000
200.000 1,600
200,000 1,600
150,000 1 ;2(Xl
2SO 000 2,000
150,Oo() 1,200
400.000 . 3.200
750..00g 6.000
500 ~QQ(l 4,000
500.000 4;000
1;OOO;OOQ
.8;000
317 ,085.000
2.536,500
6,000
13,400
17 ,900
22,400
59,500
29,800
149,000
4,600
4,500
4,500
6,000
4,500
7,400
7400
7,400
7.400
8,900
8;900
71 500
4,600
29.800
6,000
6.000
4,500
7.600
4,soo'
11 ,900
22,400
14,800
14,800
7,600
134,500
561,3QO
29,800
29,800
17
192.400 for water infrastructure imorovements
433,000 for water infrastructure imorovements
577 .300 for wastewater infrastructure imorovements
721,600 I forwaler infraslructureimorovements
1 924 500 to rontinue work on a Wastewater
, . Treatment System Project
962 200 for Day Street Division Water System
. Improvements
4,811,000
144 200 for water and wastewater infrastructure
, lmorovements
144,300 for wastewater infrastructure .imorovemenls
144 300 forthe Peak Excess Flow TrealmenlFacilily
, for Sanitary Sewer Overflows
192,400 for wastewater infraStNcture lmorovements
144,300 forwastewaler infrastructure imprOvements
240600 forc:ontinued work on the munlcipplwilter
, outfall
240,600 for aW<lstewaler treatment plant
240,600 for. 3 waslewaterlreatment plai'lt
240600 for pre1inlinary work on waste'J'!3lar
. treatmenl imorovements
288,700 for .waStewater .;nlrastructure imorovements
288,700 for wasle\\'llt(lflnfrastructure irriprovements
2 309.300
,
144,200 for water infrastruclurelniorovements
962200 for an inlegraledstonmwalar system lor
. . Sall.shan housin~ (!e~eloj)ment
192,400 or water infraslructureimorovelTielOls
192,400 for water Infrastructure imDrovemenls
144~300 fOrwastewaler infrastructurelmorOYemenls
240.400 for water infrastructure ;llIorovements
144300 for the Ame~n Lake Gardeils Industrial
, Sewer extension .
384,900 f6(sewer infrastruclureimorovernentS. ,.
721 600 !or lh~Burbiill1k Water$ystem.. ....
, Improveml;lnls
481 200 for <lrinking Waterinfrasb'Uct\ll:El
. Imorovements .
481,200 .forWat~r inff;l.struclure imPfl)veml;lnW
240 400 ~or water.arad wasteWater inffaSttucti:it8
· . Improvements .. ..
~3~:OOO . ..
18,113,1l}O
fOI" i!s.BiosOlidsFlow-ThroughThllrriiciphillC .
962,200 TreatmentbeTrioristrati6nProjecl'" ....'
962,200
9,114,100 3DS,434,4tlO
.A....... .A........... /
.. .'
", "'." - .," .. ", . '", "." .-.
.' . -. ." . , ... ... ... .
. - . . .
'. .,' -' ," .. ... ", " .
. , . . . .,.... ' . .
. ," .' .'" .
. '- . ".' .. .' ,
. ' ' . .
. . - . - - . . :
.............TT ....CHMENT ~
DELEGATIONS MANUAL
1200 TN 516
09128/2000
GENERAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, AND MISCELLANEOUS
-102. Grants and Cooperative Agreements for Water In:frastruc~ProjectsorOther
Watee ResolJ!Ce :Projeetsfrc>mFunds Appropriated for the State artdTnoaJ '
A~iStance Grant AccoUnt or ~e Environmental Programs and Managemenf
Account
AUTHORITY. To approve and administer grants and cbOperative agreemen~JorV{,.llter
infrastnlc;ture proJ.' tctsor other waterre~UJJ:eprojeCtsfrom fundsappropnatcd for the '
S~teand TnolllAsslStanCe GrantJ\ccountotth~~vi~entaIPrograJILS3l"1(}
. Mana$ement AcCOil,ntOT any successor accounts, including aprciject ,autboriztdp.y
Section 510 oftbe Water. QUality Act.of1987~~L. 100-4. 10iSta:t. 7~80,EPA'sp;y199J
ApproJ'ri,ations A,ct(:p.L, 101-507)..andanysubsequentpublic 1a:w;and toperfmlnqtlle.r:
.ClCti~ties D~ for the effectivea$njnistratioD()ftbose grailtsand~coope~tive .
. agreements.
2, . 1;OW}lO:M DELEGATED. The AssiStilntAdn'1inistra.totforWater..arJdRegi()Il~
.AdIninistmtOtE;.
3. ..REDELEGATIONAurHOR1TY;
a. .oThe'8uthoritygnmtedto the Regional Admwsirator may be reddegatedtoffis
DivisioIiPltectotlevel,oJ" eqtlivalerit,.and:D()cfurtbc.. . .
Q. The~utbqr.itr~ted t9theAsSistCll)t. J\:d;ri:rl~stJ"ator fot W ater.m~Y r~~j~glij~ J9
.. th~~ce,Diret#o{leV~l~orequival~taIJd'nofurU1er. .. ... . . ....
4.::I.:.IMITATION$.
8.. ~xet:pt aspI9vj~~,in ~be1ow~ ,tbisdejt:satiOQapp1iesonlytotpo~~~o~d .
cooperative; agr:eements .rorwhi~ p.u~ri~isprovid~excl~si"elyina.st;l~
oilier thari.tl1e>Cl~WaterActortheS~eDrl1iking Water Act(e;g~,a@ltu:te.
inakingappI:Qpria,ti6ns totl1~Stat~..~.Tppa,lAssistanCcGrimtAcco~.o/c~~
Environmenta1Progr;m1s.and.Manag~D:1eDtAcco~t or.any S\1~~ aCcotlp~)i.
. .
b, .A wards ~SJ1bjecUo guidance issued by the Office of the Comptrollc:r:oj' ~die
Office ofWaterQl'its ComponenfOffices. .
c. This delegation also appli~tograi:1tsandcooperative agreementsforpiojects
described in, and p\lJSuant to the 1987 WaterQu~ty AcIS"ection51O.ai amended
by EP A's 1991 Appropriations Acl(P.L. iQl-S07); as aniended,
5. ADDITIONAL'REFERENCES,
a. Authority to execute (sign)' these financial assi~ance agreements is delegated to
the Regional Administrators under Delegation] -14; Assistance Ag:reerrlents;
b. 40 CFR Part 31;
c. 40 CFR Part 40 for DemODstration grants;
d. 40 CFR Part 35.Sribpa.rt K;, and
e. EPA AssistanceAOniimStratioli Manual.
ATTACHMENT 3 ..
LISTING OF CROSS-C1JTTlNG
FEDE~AU'I1IORITIES
FOR SPECIAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT PROJECfS
Environmental Authorities
ArcheOlogical and Historic Pn:seniwonAct,Pub, L 9~291. as amended
Clean Air Act, Pub. L. 9$.95. asamendect
CleariWa.ter Act, Tittles Dl,IV ani:lV~ Pub.L 92';500~as amended
Coastal narrla Resources Act..1>ub~ J:;...97-348
CoastaIZone.ManagementAct,Pub~ L .92~S83.asamended
Endangered Species Act,PQb,L 93..Z()S~)lsaincnded .
~nmenU4 Justice,ExC(#Utiv~ .~.12898
:F1POd,:Plain.~amgllinent ~~ijv~..~:t19~8as~erid~.by~c:ciitiv~c>tdq
12J4~
.. .
.l'i:P~on <JtWetlands> Ex~ve0rd~ll990.as8JnertdedbyExecutiveOrder
12~ .
f~dP.rotection~olicyA~~b.L'.'$f;7~98 .
itUl~atldWi1<ni!e CoOrtliD.ation Act,Pub~L" 85"'624. as amended
~griUnsOi1.:stevensFisheQ'~ConsetV~q~:faii4.~gem~ Act,;.pqb..L..94;:26S
N3.tiona1Environme;n~a.lP()lii::y:.Act,~.4~r.l~. ,
NatjonalHi$ric Preseniation Ad.~..L,~5.s~.~.amended
SafeDrlriking W aterAct, Pub!... ~543. 8s3tnendecl
Wildatid Scenic Rivets Ac~Pub. 1.. 9()';S4.asame:Dded
EconomiC and Miscellaneous Auth9riti~
o
Debarment and Suspension, Executive Order 12549
.".." .-------.. -'---, - ,- ._,..-'- -....-.-".._",~-~"._,..,,_._..,--
2
Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act, Pub. L.89 -754,
as.amended,andpftecufiyeOnier 12372 .
Dnlg-:-Free WoIkplace Act,.P:ub. t...J 00-690
GQvepw,entNeuttality ToWCl1"d Con.tractor.s LaborRelatiot1$,Execritiv~ Order 13402 as
amended.bY:Executive.Qt4~.13208
NeW RestrictionS on. Lobbying, SectiQX1319 of Pub. 1... 101-12)
Pium"bitiQDSteliting t() Violat,lonS of the Clean WaterA~o:rctean Air Act With respect to
Fe<:leia1.conyaCts,~ts)orl()~under Section 306 of~Clean ArrActandSecnoil
508oftheC1eanWaterAC4and~ecutivc Order .f1738. .
'Unifonn:ReloCatiohmid ReatPropet1'Y AcquisitionPoiiciesAd..Pub.L..91.646, as
amended
CIvil tugbl$;N oDdiScrliiJi"atio~,..~qJlal..EPlploymeptOppOl'htllity Authorities.
AgepisqlTnjijati~~~Pph; .......94-'135
. ~EmpioynieiQe~jwnjt;y.;~ecutiveOrderli2~
S~tiop I~()~~~~W~J\c4 Pub. L92~5()() .
s~tj0115~()t.~lt~~~ia9QnA~Pub.L9j.;~ifs~~~cJ:1~#il;y~Jt~~e .Pr4.~
11~14~dn250.. . ..... ..
.. .
Title YIof~CivilRiglrts~PUb. L 8&-352
... . l)iS;ldvantagedJju,s~~:~A~lJ>~~~th(lrities
. ...
.EP Ns.Ff 1~93:App$1'Jri3,tJt>nS;Act,Pub. 1... 102...389
. '
secti()n.l~of~SDj.~11J3'f~riessMministrationR.~nandAmendmtIitAct,..
l>ub, L. l00.~90
sman.MiooritYandW6menOwnedBusinessEnttIp~.~~tive..0I9ers 11625.
1213g>and12432. . .
, <
. ..".
AT....T'..AC-.'B.'....-M.....E.N' T4
.. , .' ... -.-- .' ".. .
... - . ,..,. .... -.".. .
,...: . . .:">,'-" .... ...
~S7-4~
~.^'
~....~. "\
!ii ~"""A 0
<<l~'"
~~ -'~#
t .....,'c
UNITED ST A TESENVIRONMENT Al PROTECTION AGENCY
WAsHINGTON, D.C. 20460
JAN 20 1995
OFFICEOf'
ENFoRCeJ;ENT .AND
~ASSUfWlCE
MEMO~DUM
NEPA Guidance .:for'Special Wastewater Trc';"tment prpjects
inth€~ FY9~APPrpPei.ion Bi~ ..~
Richa:r:d..E. Sanderso. ... ~.
Director .. ,.... .
O;ffice of Federal ..Ptivities (22.52)
'1'O:NEPA Coordina,tpl:':s
suBJECT:.
FROM:
...iJ:'I1.~.;PUrpo$eoft~.is'xn~or:andUlD is toprovidegUidal1ce on the
reguir~entf; ..,f~. compl!ance with> 'th.e ..NatiOnal EnvixorUDeT1tal . .
PPJ,.,ic:yAct.(NEJ:iA,lforspecialP;r:pjects authoriz;e(}for~J?A ~ant
l~i~:!~iRt:~r~~:~~1H~~Eerit.
~z]~~;~l~;r~~~:~~~~~~~ii;e
. Gen~;:al'c;q1W$el . (OGc)h~~' pt"epar~ ..~n"Analysisof~A
i~~~z~iwt~~~st~cf:;q~~i;;:h~ir:~~f;i~i~obit~ci~:
. ... .. ..'
OFAGuidaricetoReqiomll :NmlAcoordinators
.,. .' '. - -. . '. . " . ';.. ", ..:
., An.inaepend~t EPA~A,~:ncllysisfor the n~n;...deIllonstrati.on
pr()'~cts is~~ir~.;rnad9~;i,o~, o~er cross-:c~t~~9' fe~e.ral
~f;atut:.~,. ~\1Cll ast:he~dflnlJ~ed .SpeC1es Act and1:he~at;;~ql1~J,
Hi~'t:oJ;'i.c I're~ervationAct;~+so a}>ply to these j?rojef::i:s.Th'e
cduricilon Envlrc:m:ilieJitaa ~ali'tY'E1 (CEQ) N:ePA r~::1.atioI)$do not
allQ~EPA to adopt astqt~ilri~lysis. However,' t):).e~!\ .'
regp.1 a'tlofis . do reqU~e a9'~nt:i~s' to "cooperate withsta:ee arid
loc~lagendies to the fullest extent possible to reduce
.@ RoqeJ<do~
... ."....,.oli,~."*'..!>>9"'-
. .. ---...._75",oqded_
duplicati~n between NEPA ana: st!3-te' itno' local' requireIllents n
,(40.CFR 1506 ~ 2). ,There ':ire severaJ:ways 'the ~egi6ns can use j;.he
existing i,nfonnation 'and ~ssessm~nts' for these projects as _" ,
smnDa-rized below and as discussed in. greater o.detail in the ".~',
attached OGC analysis. 'In ~:11 cases6 EPA %I1us't independentl.y.'. .
evaluate tbe state documentation'and review-process and is
re::lponsible for the accuracyoftheNEPA documentation and the
adequacy of the p~ocess (-40 C~ 1506.5). , .
. Where .~states 'have. performed environlllenta~ reviews under
NEPA-:-lilce. s~tutes or ,pu.rsua-nt: to 'S,ta1;-e' ReV9lyiilg runQ : . ,
r.egu.;Lations" ,EPA 'can incorporate,::but'. pot:. simply. adopt, the
state an~;Lysis into ..~e .Agency's' NEPA: analysis. , . , ,.: ,.;.
". . '_40.1 .~. ... .' _:a.... "'-,...~:" . . .... ~-...~.: .::. ~ '. ',. ".:..
., Wh~e .s,tate r~yiews.have 'fo~d' no.signifi~ant ;L1Dpacts ,and
~A approves'ofthat finding and the state process,. 'EP~ may,
i~sue an ~nvironme~tal assessment (EA).-sUJ:lPnarizing and ,.. .
re.f~~ncing. the stat~anCl:ly'sis' and an, accoinpanY:in<.J Finding'
of No Signifi~ant Impact (FONSI~).' _',., ,. : .
. Wh,ere':s:tate .review.s 'have' found significa~t ilnP<l.cts orEPA
.independently, deterDIines tbatthere are sigril,~ii::ant i.mpactsj'
J:,:PA inust ,i;Ssue a not,ice o~ intent "and proceed with an' - ..
environment:al 'impact sbitement (EIS) and -recqrd.'of decision
(ROD) .in accord~mc:e. with the AgehCy#S'regulatibhs. at 40 .c~
Part 6. " ' . . o,~'
. . Where cons:t:r:-rictipri,of.projects .isco:mpleteor nearly
co?Upleted-, a" ~EP~ analysis will not. have t:o b.e ,done. '
. wbere,conatrUc:tion has'started and.the.pl::p:)ec:t is not
nearly completed, a ~A analysis is~requir~ and a .
noti.fi9<1tion ofinten~ to pursue an. independent. analysis
:must be ,sent .to the g-rqn~e.
-where proiectfil to be..funded bave beeriongpinfiJ . for 'sev~al
year,s,ad(}itional' ass.essme~t lilay not, .~~reqUi:t"e~if. pri.or~ .
federal NEPA doClilnentation. has addressed, the . pOrtions .Of. t)ie ..
project tobefun~-by:the FY95 -grant.. The' re<.;rlCinwi:q' ..... . .
neeClt.o. assure~at sincefhe previousasf1~.~Emt,: 1)tl1e;rB
are no.substal1tia:l chang~s.in the. proposed' ac;tiqn rele.va"nt:
to envirolUll.entaleonce:tns ,or 2) the,rea:renosignific:ant
new circumstances or information relev~ntto'env1r9nmen~X
concerns and bearing on the proposed action o~ l.tsimpact;:E!"
If theNEPAanalysis'was cartied.out UJlder'an earlier
cop~'trUct:ion grant action and, is no lonq~r adequat~ or .~e
l'J;pject has" not previously.been assessed by EPA, .it;; will' be'
necessary to issue either an };A/FONSI or an ~IS/ROO. The
regulations app1icable to tbese special,project:gJ:ants'are t.q.e
.CEQ ,regulations' (40 eFR Parts 15'00-1508) and EP~'s NEPA ,".' ., ..'
regulations (40 <;:FRpart 6; ,~ubparts A-D).. EPA' 5 regulations 'oat
40' CPR. Part 6, Subpart E, ~whilethey do not !3Pply- to ,the~e
special project grants, 1Dayproviae additiortal <J1:1i$lance.,., .,' li.<
, '.: '" We" ;;m:ticipate". tlia.f:" add1 t;iomil:, issues .'9r s~isi;pe~'~;inay'~'.-cri-'i~~'~'
~!iich:: are riot '~uny trtiatea' in 'ttiisgeneral, .guldiulc?: 1i)'-e11l.ci~Uiii'! ,~:
',These =.;hou;t4.be,:brpught.'to.our attention, as:s~ori' ~s 'pb~sJ:h1e;;':;~.'Iri~
. addition;; ~e li'a'l/e scheduLed a 'telecQnf~r~:nce ,un '. Tuesday., , JaJi~:
~4, ..1:995 .fr~11.:0.0.' ',a :,'lD~ '.:to .,J.2: obncion. east~. $taridard.>~~e.to~:.':,
d.fscussth1.s'quidanCe,' .artdaddit-i.onal: issues or conce.rns~'With th~' ,
pi-<?6ess. ~ec'aii:in :nU:mbei:-i~ (2Q2)' 2~O-'4257. J~e:lo<?k, fo~'cf_
to. your 'p,~icip~ti~n _ ':plE?ise' inform. ,John, .G,~pa (202/260-59:19). '
1:(,.you or>y.o~, s1?aff .'.wlll.;not .~ on :the :ca.l1. . .... . :- .' I.... ,:',. :'~- .
~~~n~~~
>. ~,i'Ed' ; Gross;;' 6wM :;;-.;
...., '. .,...., ,'. '.' ....' -' ..... .. ......
.~
,\'
:..,'
:1~~~~:
~~.p-~~_ ff"~_,,:
-:""Jlr.,~.;....~,::lr;,...~"'(1.
ATTA'CHMENT5
~~<;'D S1,,~
i ^ YLl
S~~
.~ -. _.' , 0
~ . "'. "-7-
"<:. .. ..... ..c II
~"'t'_~ltt.l'
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL'PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
JUl 2 9 LOO3
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
Con~itioning Grants for Water lnUastructUre Projects Prior to NEPA R~C)VS.
AnneN(jJtonMil1er~,Director~ . .~. ..... ..... ... ..
.OfficelifF~lAr.t;v;"_ IJ
,/fI."k-
,,- ~ .
JamesA. Hai11c)J]"Dlreetor
Office.ofWastewa~erMiln3ge
FROM
. ....,. .... --' .
EPANEJ>A C()Dlpb~ce Coordi . tors. Regionsl-X
Wat,etDivisionJjirectots. ReginsJ -x
, 1Jl(;Po/PP,~;;ofWs~~o~~is to alert you lothc<:RJtcmn~ofl1 recentCPurt~;that .
wHl affectbQ\VYQ~.~e;gIaJl~for.thespecialproJectsaward~Jnlderthealithority;ot.the ..' ... .
Ag~.~ ApproFi~lonsA~, .
TO:
In thC)an~20, 199$ll1em()raDdum, "NEPA Gui~f'orS~aJ:Wa.stew~e;
Projects' in the FY: l~~ ApprtlpriatiolT13i1l;" RichardE,:. Sanf.1et:$QDpI'1)VidCd SUictance on how
EPA wouldcomply:;;f;ith~NationalEnvirorimentaIPoJil:)'Act,~A)forthe.~alwatCr:
==i~~~~S~$!':J~;t~.
poHcydirection (~~At:ol,l1p1i~fw:aJlofthe specialp~ inclUdingdiiiikiztgwater. .
stormwaterandgro-QDdwnter~oninfutstrUcture projects. . . . . .. ..
FoUoW1ng~is~()fthe 1995memoi"andum,the Of,ficeofrederal A~yiH~((?FA)
determiriedthatR.~onScoDld .awardgran~ for special Appropriations Act projects bef~..
completing a NEr~~viewifthegr.1nt award contained acondit:i()n~tirag1bat ~Awould.nOt
fund any workbf;y9J1Qthe C()DCeptual design pointuntiJ t:ompletioXJ oftheapplicabJe. ...... .. ....
requUeJDeotSofNEPA 1ID.dotberCro~g statutes such as tbeEJJdan~emi SpeciesAct.1'bis
guidance basbeei1plc:fuoria1izedin~ "STAG'Guidelines"~~uanyby the Ofl:iceo!
Wastewater Management{OV/M), We have developed the at1a~ model grant conditiQn(with
optionallanguage'dependingQ[1 the situation ofaspecificgtaIlt)tlui1canlx: used tosetoUl1be ,
~ific restrictiomtbegranieewould agree to ,when EPAawards a grant that iQcltides activity .
beyond conceptual design before the NEP A review is completed. '
Internet Addms(URL). hllp:l/w'ww.opagov
Re<;y<ltdIl'Jecy<bt>>. ./'rlnled wllh v~ O. Ba$ed1nl<s Qtl Recydad P;lpH~tml 30'%. ~
_..__._. __._______.__..____ ___.....__......_~_.. _._u..._. ._'.. ..-. ._-_...~ .._.;.....
2
In a recent court case, CARE v. EPA. No.D),.Q417 (D.D,CApri] ]5,2003) involving a
:NEP A challenge to aloca1 sewer proj~tO be funded in part by an EP A grant; the court
suggested that ifEPA had awaniedthespecialApptQpriationsAct grant prior to completing the
NEP A review, the entire project, even the part beingcoristrocted with local funds.>might have
been considered a Federal projett and subjecttolheNEPAreqUirements. This cOUldh3ve'
f(:sulted in the collrt enjoiningt}}e entiiepioj~t]X:mUngconWJetion of theNEPAreview. This
court case raises the risk that projects could ~ssfully be challenged und~ NEPA when EPA
awards grants that include a grnntconditionstatmgthatEPAwiB not fund any work. beyond the
conCeptual desigitpoint until theNEPAp~iscompl~ted. Accordingly. We recbmmendthat
you irifOfIDgIaIitees of this. poteritialissu~ if a (:'ondit1oned grant is being cOnSid~e(t
. tJDderthe STAG Gmde1inesR(;&.i()Jl$,Olay ~e separate planning graots to specjal
AppropriationS Act projectreeipierits. 1]le~llItSconsistently have held thatF.ederaJ attionsthat
iilVo1vc ()nIyphuining activitiesiirenotSp'bj~tONEPA. Althoughamrrding twosePanite grants
(onefo!planniIig activities and~eforau()1ber~tivi6es)iny(jlves more paperWork; we
~nim~dihatthe Regions c:on$ide..usmglbis8pproacb~ '
TheOfficeofGenera1 COUt1Sel <QGC) bas eoncurred in this memorandwn.lfyoubave
anyqu~oDS conc~gthe cont~Jlts()f~SOjeJi9~dUIp,YOllmay CQntact us_, ol"~ve your
sWI ~orilj1C[JOe Mont~omery (2()2:':5~~n~7)'lffbFAj MarilynKuray (202-,:~64-'3449}m0<3C.
or~McGee (202-5Q4.c0619}in:OWM~.
.AtUI~hment
, cc:R.ithard:K~
MODEL GRANT CONDmONS
ToB~InClu4ed in STAG Grants AwaroedBtfore
C(m)cpletlo~orEDvjroDme~taIReview onder the N~tioDalEDvlroDmeDtal Policy Act
Insb'ticiioDsforPro'ectomcers: .
FPTProJectsthathavenotp!Ogre$~dbeyond conceptual designlj>riQriP~ aw~ include the
introductoryparilgr.1phs and~ as appropriate. the two paragtaphs}a.~ied lI()ptionL"
ForprOj eClstbathaveStarteadetai1f:d design or construction ptiortOthl;:starfof:tbcfiseal year
f(jr)vhicll thefi$ds Wer:eapprt)piiat~ include the introductOryParagraph~ a.rid.ffi~p~graph
l~eled i'bptiOD :~.. . .. ... . ..
. .
For projeclSthat startedd~1edidcSi8n or constructionaftet thCSWt:Ofthefiscalyear for which
~.1imds wereappJl)pI:ii!,tt;ilbut~r()re completionorthe~eijtalriM~P.rOcC#itbc
R~~n$bqUld~ther; - ..-. .
.Awartl~in~~ent,alpt~only ind~desp1annin,g.ac.mti~~.. Apnt forJ,he
remamderoftheptoject:wouid~awatded aftertbcNEPArCq11itCnents and other
rclc:VanhlltbO#ti~h~cbeenmet,or; .. ...... ..
. r .
... .
. ..
. .
~::a=:~:~.~e projeCt after~c.~A..~Crits.andOthcr
NEPA.'t~lnllllilnce:
~A~~~t:~~:~=:~~:~:~~:1r~~~~~;:liS~.
AcCOtdingly: .. . .
... _.~
.'fhe)"eCipienta~tC)prpyitle~J\ma time1yfashion, a.A..c:n~'infOPli~6D~..
..d~~t.(BIP)CQn~gaU .tpe;~sal)' infonnatiol1()l1.lbcproJ~'in~lUdjng..awrittc:n
~ofthe~vesandtheenVironmental.~ otthi:.P~jec:tThc~II~~pe,Of
. sUffiCient sc6peand.detiUltbemlb1e EPA toperfOIDl an enviromnc:ntalIeYiew underNEPAand
othe;r:Federa} enviiontneritalstatUteS- .
lCoooeptud design isesscntia1lythe same as DQlitypWxiimgas~i:QEPA'SConstnlctioD Gmrts
~
2
OptiOD 1: (To be used for projects fhatbave not prpgl"essed beyond cODceptual design
prior tl) grant award)
The recipient agreesilot to Wee any action on the project l>eypndconceptual desi~ iDclriQipg
but Dol limited to. ~g thepreparotionofpllUlsandsp~iiications, pwchasmg land,
a4vertisingor a'\"iarcllng design andIorconStroction contracts,iIlliiating constroction Qr
requcstingreimbursement fronl EP A forcosts,a.ssociatedwith such actioDS untilsucbtIme>as .
EPA bas c6hrpleted its enviromnental review in accordance withNEJ> A and 40 C.KR.,;Parts 6
aDd 1500 ~.mm.; COillptetion of this review will1>eevidenc.edbytbe issuance. oCac.:u~OrjAAl
Exch:ision (CE); 1hecoD~lusionoft)ie finding of No Si8X1ifi~Itnpact (FONSI)proCeSSj()T~
isSuance of a Recc:lrdpfDeclsion (RQP)~ .
1'berecipient agrees that, upon corhpletiotJ. ofthcNIWA review. design and ronstrUctil)lub311be
niideJfaken inBCfOidance With the rCSlilts,()f thatteView.iI1cll1IHngbut not limitedto.th,c.
ful,plementadtmgfmeasures.EP Aide.ntifi~as~bletoriiitigate the c;nviroImlen$~~
oftbeprojectEIlA ~estl1e tight tounilateranyterm~ethisgrant in~eevcrir~~jpi.ent
failStQ COIilpJywith tbiscoooitioD.in accordancewith40C.F1{. Section 31.43.
OptioD~:{:fp.~'1is~f()l"projeCtsth.~t'bave$pu1ecI~etaneddesign or cODstruc#o~piiRt
. .to t]Je;$f3rl(jrthefi$~a1 y~rror;W:b;iclJthe'lUsl<<bW~r:e 2PPl'OPriat~d):. .. ...
The recjpieJ:lta.gq:~ to cooperate witbtbeEP AptOJep~offi~t()establisb tbe~i"
-prqcedUi-es~~f()naw~to ensure. that@~A.cI1VilqJunC#talrCview procesS.~-:~ri1J?'l~m
acc:orilimceWitbNEPAai1d40 c.FR. :ParlS6and 1500 ak\COm letion ofthisieVie'\V Will be
evide'nCedl?ythe,i~~'()faC3tegmif#~~l\1Si~nlClt)~*~on of~~~~.()(N()
SignifiCantlrnp3!;l(FOlil~prpCt-,sst. or~e.iSS\Janccof~RetQijJ;()fDecision(llo,D} .. .
Fl#thermorc:.~l!:t;cipiemagrtes to irtlpJclPent ~blcm~ to niitigat~tl)e
c:nYironri1~~t~(~pa~ of~pJOj~ . .. ..
EPAwlllnot apptoyeorfund anywoIkbeyond1he~tq1l19~ignpoint untiltlj~~^
Jequirements and otbettelevanl autbpritiesbaie~m~M.ditiqnally. EPA~.~~engilt,
to uriilaiera1lyt~.thisgrant.inthtn:ventthereqpic::nt;fafiStocOmply withtlJis.~tiio;#.ih
accordancewitb40 CF:jl Section 31.43~ .
. ..
ATTACHMEN'T6
.~
~
~
to>
~
c:)
I"~
I
.~
I:tl
....:
.{ti
.6
UJ
.....
'0
f
.Ci:
o
.11.
lri
.w
Ci:
..0.
.~
w.
~
lLl
':Ci:
o
U
I
.},o
Z
W
;&.
Vl
Vl
'11I.I
Vl
en
<
U)
.~.
11I.I
Z
w
I:Q
u.
.g::.
th
~.
u
~
c(
.0 .
'g tl vi
10 Q) 1:>
\nO' QJ
5b..e
E= c.
=:; ~ Q)
:b.E 0.
o :p
c :;
~.Q E
....'lii
BE
~.E
I:C
=-;
~fi
.2Q1
UolJ
1:10
- C7l
=~
.~.C7l
~g
C,s
.c; Ih
:efij
g,'a
Q)U>
"-'
L-f
J2w
-c '0
QJC
UJ.IO
='ti
Q)Q1
~t;
= cu
3='
.0"
1U~
~.B
V)fl)
-Coo
OQ)
~.fi
.!1Q)
~.c
+'1:
.~lil
c~
0..
]!..5l
oQ)
>f=
V .
:Ec4
e4l
t}C>
.9!~
Glen
c:c:
<:"3:
.0
<11=
~E
~~
10....
WE c:
. 0
Gl't:l
fi c:.
.,:J
::IE
0<11
.\11 0>
;>OC:
<<1-
-t;
ClI=
g:n
o.u
~~
F5:
<ll
U
C .
IOQ)
c:-
a::~
>-~
10-
Eg;
c::1O
IO~
.QOJ
<ll,c
c.~
.En
UJe:
lOW
._ E
CE
.20
....u
Sa;
Ql.s::
x.....
CIlo
1:"
!tic:
S!.IO
..... 01
Oc
Q)-
E~
vli;
CJU
s: '
.....<1.1
.....,u
fl)::l
~g
11)-
f'~
Cl..~
1i~
:l .
~tl
:SQ)
:ae-
,5 c..
'5~
IIIi:-.
II)E
....<11
12""
I:
..,.-
..10
'00..
cC:
100
_c
ML-
a
f'i::
_10
.-IC
_0
O:P
. a.
~o
L- OJ
:JL-
11I10
3.c
EM
Q)~
tift!
ii -
E~
0....
U*
E
W
.....
III
>-
III
III
.,r:
.....
~
.Q
"ili
III
C
o
13
::l
."0
f!
<11
0>
C
:g
.Q
u
;::
U
II)
0.
III
.CIl
~
U
Q)
e-
o.;,;
~e
~.-o
iil-c
.OJ ~
8a
OOD
.r-
c:
."". r- .!!I
c c. 0.
o8t:
~. GOJ
u E
.2 0 II!
iiii6tn
.;..I -.J -~
~ ~.E
.,....,... 't:l
CI -g ..41
..:5. tl 1!
. UJ QJ .Q1
'x ~~
GI .~ ..~
c.
10 cu ..1lJ
o
<(
Z-
Vl
1Il Q)
III fi
:l _.....
'C iIIQ
III 5l .!!!
'la :J 10
C -g g,
.~ 'lii~
ClI c: -
'C .!2' . ~
... ~ 0"
o '0...
C >. Q) B .
01:)..r::mL-
~ 0 ~ ~jg
e~ 0 Q) ~
B.$ IL 5 "
1Il.1ll '11I0
e== '> .~...
\,;,"t:l 10.'1: C:
o JIl .c"e
6 ~ :!:! 'lii t:
__.... ~..s::. 0-
~.~ m ~ l
...... II) X.:l
Ez .8 ~.cU
nc ~ I1:lE
E~ .~. S ~
.Q)UL--
gt:=c.~
;"'0 .~" 10
;.u 10 6:=
.0 '!::: - _
'': 0 "ili.?; 1:>
~..'C ~ u~
.0..1: 10 11)..0
UAI ~ ~ 5.
''<i
.g
--
ill
:ts
-Gl
..,..'
0'
~
...,-
...~
I:Il
C:. ".
I~.:.:~o..,......~z;.'
"-';';"
-..CJ
.....
.ell
..~]
0.....
.,':.~ ~
,_8.....
.,.v c
.in CI)
E
I. .>-
.11I
..fl;
c::
-vi
1:$
III
E'
0..",;
.11I ...
fi C
o &
::; E
c ell
~ C
o III
Eo
<<I -
c:U-
<<I~
oU!
~~
Ul"iii
;:....
ut?-
4:i
U'C rD
'-
'iii.
i.
o
....
'0
....
Gl
A
c
.8
.!lIri.'
'-
-ci
~
jj
Ill. X
E' ....
c.
.CIJ
,r:
....
.s~>
,> 0
"C.l:Ilm
c.1II
~ '10 B~
1:>.....
v <tl.o
0' or :J. M
5. ~ : .~
v -~
.p' 's--:::
,........ ~CIJ e
iii,2....1;:...
Ccn\3I11M
!S!!U)'
tUO~~~
...., cnt-1....-.~
EEze=
...<<1-0.
:a u 1011I
L. Ul tU U ...
II.l ~u 5 H
! z Gli:)of
--
i.
r
l.
r
i
!
I
,
t
I
,
1.
"
J
I
I.
I
I:
J
I
f
~.
i
I.
I: I'.'';'
t ~~
I
t
l-
F
II
i,
I'
f'
I:
t
I
i'...... r~~ '
f ~~;i .
r
l'
I
r
I.
f
[
,
t.
t~ ~i D:.:.!......~... lIs
L. o:e -tj..:. 00# I ..~~
!1:Ji ~'.Id !,".'1
Cl B ~ r-~ '2 ....~ Qo
lU~ii5CIJ e ,....
lll.EE~.c:DO~ !i
c.-tUc.... "" Mia
CII.b> tU .~ 1'- CIlu B -u ~ __c
~ce1:g13 u
HHHH Iii
u :s.. ro ro a. 8. \,l 1:; i c.
C.::I::l COJ ..
1Il1n0'0'1IIl/)'jjjll:: Co
E:c......:s~.....1II ,-
CIl~.f!.e-EtU 'jg
> CIl to ltI l3 -5 III ..c:... '. ~
oo:t~oIOE-:;; 01.1:
ao 0 .... /~
E . ,-
Mro ..c U. 1C1)
* ; c
!~
I L;. OJ
j ~ E
! U Q
I a: z
I
i
.s::: .
...X
-0
:8.c
.c.!!!
c.i.c
-.....
:o~
:J\,l
C.CIl
.s::.
01,1
~~
'i5E
g.iii
...f!
OJ;:J
tot}
:t :J
L-
;........
C III
lI:l f!
......
Ql C
'0-
'5C1l
oD)
...>
CL.e
.....0.
,g .E
.l3~
o c:
'00
1:)-:)
$..0
E' ...
p.ll
Jt~
....c
.. II)
:t; .c '
c 0 0 0 0 0 0 tJ r; 0
w
0 0 '0 0.: Cl :0 0 '0: -0 0
:P
ill
L-
0 (J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r1
.... W
III
GJ C. .~ .~. 'c. ~ :c.. C. .fl. C.
.~ ,
0 .0 Ci ..... [] 0 D 0 .-;
'-' L.J
c: 0_' '0 '0- 0 9 -0 p. 0 O.
.0
i3 .....
II.l d [J CI 0 0 IJ 0 0
.... :.'+1
o. Do: .~ :~. ~ 'i:i, 110;. il.; :0.. ,I),.
L-
~.
.,
,
, c.
, c .2
.....
0 10
:p lU
..-l..i.: .~ '.::
>- III \,l
~: III
~ ,gi ~, u '.I.;.j. u ~.
III ,~ f!.. .,1j .Q)
II) :l ~ , A 0-
.U1 III .OJ ;s:: t:l ..'JlI III '"
L.' .;J::. ."" .....' -1ti
:l Ii: C .jlJ
II) .", ftl 0 ..11I 11I
" .... ... ..... ~ -u. "" _<II'
Gl cu- 1lI ".1-', B '\~ .q, ... ~.
. .
.~ .0.
... .,t; <11 ..10 U .... Q, 9-
III 0. .i= 'oIJ: ..~. a- .10, .E
c c en Jg ,.,. I I
.~ s;1' Ii:: .~, 'g ftl. ,.c B ~. .~
~ E 8 CIJ :~
1lI t: '0 .~ ~ ,r:-
:co 1:, jC, ;'0, .<<1. .;t.. .,<1/ ..... .0'
0 0: VI .u .~ 'u) ~. 0
p
....
c
"0
-Do
C
o
C
IU
...
~
I
h
:>
It
III
b.
Z
i-t
>
.;.....
XI
c
~
u
.f!
...
c:.
GJ
S
Q) III
;s:: ~.
.... .,&,,1'
>-
,Q
'0
III
~
Q)
III
C
o
'P
10
'3
n
.0
0.1:)
'" OJ
:l:e-
:l Po.
*
PI
.,..."
1/1.
~
'C~
:::=0
m~
81;:
L. .lll
~E
'C III
III E
'tV.....
GI
.. -
-
"'-0
B c>
; E
"
oW
III
III
::
...
o
Gl
EtJ
::s ClI
oe'
> 0.
If
N
't:l
0>
E
[I')
C
0,
iJ . ,- .
.~noooo
o
'Iii
.<1)
~
C
0, . ..... .
BPDQOQ
e . -,
a
L-
a.
':i'.
.'0.
.Q)
....
.ClI
;;~
:0
u
.cu
......
,1il,;
H-f~ ~
!Li
:....;::.
!U!r:
..'" ,
"li, .
t:-:--~ :'
:;',:;,--',
:!iJi~ '.~
f~r~ ..1
~?r .:;
,\~':i, ~
..~
..<1,1-.
t.~
t;-;:
,-,g..t'
DEF1NIDONS and DATA SOURCES forthe Core Benefits Measures
0.
a. Project name and tracking #s
Enter-the project name and the number used \0 track the project in your state CWSRF
program. If additiOnal tracking Infonnatlon is required, enter "a," "'b;'" "c,'" etc. For
example,lfthe.project number refers to the loan and this only one of three projects under
thatlCiaOI .dlfferentfate the projects as "'a,'" ;1Ob/and "c,''' If the projecttecelveda previous
CWSRFloan, note tHe tracking nUf!1ber oftheorlgimit loan/prOject.
b. P~r~'ittype'&nlJmber, waterbopy J:()112~digitHUC, otherl()cati()nJnformation
PerroittypeWillus,uany be "'NPDES/" butl11ay be groundwater or land dischar-ge.., Please
also. eriteraWatert.>ody ID #, a HUC (hyqrol()Qk.unit code) number, or soi:rleotb~r
ge~~ fa phle lpfotTr'lation for the. affected waterbody(les). ThIs Is espeda 11'1 1m portaht If the
facility tha.t thepr:oJect affects does not have a permit or it the project affects a Y(<iterbody
orwaterpod'es~erthan the rece(vJng waterbody forthlsfaclllty.Apermitnumber itself
should allow states and EPA to aCCE$S this Jnformatloh. ThiS. Information wlllallowEPA to
aCc~additional information abOut thewatetbodY froinoth~ datasourtes,Warerbody 10
#'5 arepcirtof1the.NaUonaIHydragraphY Dcit.iset(NHD) and are available throUghniap
Intei1aces()nt/1~E>Aand USGS webSltes; as are HUCS, State environmental or mappIng
agencies ca r:ra Iso often provide thlstnfonnation, .
J
C~ CWSR-F:I~h~rn()unttotheprolect.....
~nter'tl1e;~i'Q9,l!rJtloaned to f1nan~the~petlflcproject. This may (jiffer frQrrithetotalloan
arno:untif1=he',joanJlnanees mliltl;Plept~jectSi . ..
. . .
. . . .
g..TO~l~W~IW.loanamountandexec;ui'ondate
~nt~rttletiitc.ll loaq.amount andtbe datec;ifJo;:lnexecLitlon.
.Iilter~~strate~Jldrepa:ymePt p~lpd;. .. .'... ' . .... .... ..
El=iA'w.mlise;thlilhformatlon and.rriarketda~tocornpute eStimated. borrow.er Sa\fJngs due
tcltt\eCWSR.FintereSt ~te subsIdy. .P.~P4rtm~nna! Interest rate toatine;1udes any fees to
b$tcaptUi"etheborroWers. reatlzedsavlnss. . .
e!. ."'.I~.s'pr~ie~~t~sori~s fo~'~h~.~an. . .. ... . '. ...
0~r",:;.~~t:~~~~st~al:;e~e;~~@~aflW:~dt!r~J6rri:~aes7~~rea~1sJ:~~W;~t~j~~~rateij
catatog{Jlrig;berief~nifortnatlon~ Select all&tegories that applytlj'the pro~ct;(not .an
cat~goii~\t6atapply tottle .Ioan)~ (Theelecf:l-Qrlh: verSion. makesthl!VlTl~~~sJer.)
~o,t~:':#the;p~j~~rnpiJdes niultlp\er.jIMS,~tegOrfes (next pag~)/.pl~S~Cbri~!d~..
re'portlng. prQjed: cost: aUQeated to eacIlNIM$;:ate9()TY. Thlsoptlon~I~~~pwilrhelp EPA use
envlronmentai benefits InfOrmatlon.tci the Qr~atesteffed:.. . .. . .. ..
Category
1: Secondary treatment and best practicable wastewater treatment technology.
II Advanced treatment.
lIlA InfiltratfonjlnftoW. correction.
lIIB Replacement and/or major rehabilitation of existing sewer systems.
IVA New collector sewer syst~ms and appurtenances.
IVB New Interceptor seWer systems and appurtenances.
V Correction of combIned sewer-overflows.
VI Munidpal storm water management programs pursuant to NPDES permits.
VII Nonpolntsource projectS related to
A agrlculture activIties
8 anlmal agricultural actIvities
C forestry activities .
o development: roads,buildIngsi: etc
E "ground water pqllutlon
. F boating and marinas
G mining and quarrylngactl\i'ities
X Recycled water di~r;butloh
H Id.le,anduriderused Industrial sites
I peti-oleurnorchernlcal tanks
Jsanltarylandfllls "
kstreambank!shClreline modification,..
dams,wetJand/rlparlanlmprovemen~
~ r~habjJitatronjr'eplacement of Individual.
Qrcoinmunltysewage dlsposalsysterns
1., .
{JseJ'popuJationSehied . . ... ...... ... . .... ..... ...
Enter the number ofpeoplethat:thepr(jj~ct $erve,sdJreqly :~i:ldtp~.nulTlber of people
. CUrrently connected tp thepertril~;~radUW orsysternthattl1eCW$RFprOje~.lnwroYe$, .1. ..
!:his fnforma.tlon has not.b~n lJj:>(IC!t~'9n theperrnlt:~~ntlY,pt/:ieappHcant should be abl~
f~ provide it easily; . . ... . . . .
.. .. . .
. .
.. .
. Examole: A project that Slmplye)(i:E;rids se\oYerlitlesto:aneig,",l,OrhQOd that wasformetJyori
.~ptlcwould ()n1yregrstel71:heP9P~la.tloraoftl1,athel~hbO~hOOcl ~SEived dlrgctfy. I&I .. ..
..Improyements throljghouttlle5Y$tem..tl)at: .aljo~th~b-eato'leJ1tpiC!nttC)malntaln. capaCIty .
..forthe newlyconnectei.fnef~hborhQ~,hp~eYer, WOlJli:I..~.~i?terthe,en~re-poPUlatioh
c9nnected to that fadn~~$~~Iyi!(f'Cllijc:tIY. IJlq()th~:x;aTnR'eCf:l~,We.would enter tbe'
entlrepopulatlori (:(mhe(te(:Jtc;)~tll:~;faCllltylnttJefacilltybIAnk. .ttllJS for the latter case, we
enter the entire populatlonconnE:<:tedtothefaclllty!ilPbthblahkS.- . .. .
2.
Volume of wastewatertreatedlprocessed
For the project,enterth.e f1owthatitdii-ectly affects. This figure could be equivalent tothe
entry for the facllity(les), the design flow obtained from the. engineering plans or updatecj .
permit for the fadltty. Whenflqw cBnnotbeaccurately calculated for each phase of a
phased project, divide the final resulting affected flow and design flow: by the number of
antldpated loan commitments and report the quotient for each commitment year.
ExamDlel;
A CWSRF loan funds rehabilitation of two pump station~, each of which processes 8% of
total flow to the treatment fad lity . Enter 16% ofthetotal flow f()r the project and ent~ the
total design flow for thefadlil:y. - . .
Exaffiole 2:
A CWSR.Floanfuhds 1&1 repair designed to only affect 5% of flow but is designed to reduce
wet weather flow by 12%, Because this project Is not predominantly a wet weather
projeet,wewouJd tount the 5%. (If Is was a wet weather project, we woulp count the
12%.) Enter the total design flow for the facmty,
3.
a, Improv~m~ntor m~intenani::eof waterqLiality.
To contiibu~~t() water qualIty improvementta project must reduce pol1utantloadlf'!gt~the
recei",in9#~terbody.. A project that slniplyslJstains thetreatn1ent capacity of a fa~lUty
counts for water quality maintenan(:e. Findthlslhfonnatlon In the engineering pnQlor
envlrcmrnental review do~uments for i:1 prqjec:t.kmay be wise to.confinnpre~projeq:
pollutantI9.i:ldlngs wlt;blhformatlon from the mc$: rE!cent Discharge MOl1ltcirlng ReportS
(PMRS), (see also 3d.) . .
b. Cpmplian~
usethe.~h~in.~eringa.n('l e.nvironmer)tal reVle'li dpciiiTlenl:s, thepMR.?j Br;ldtl1epetm.it(l]lost
likely .a'~PP~ per-mit;butalso possibly a reus~,recharge/orland discharge pe-rTnlt)jal~ng
with al'lya<:\rrJr.ilstratlve, cOrisent, or couTtorders.Any project that ellmlna.tes rlskior
noncoiiij,llahce can be ccitihtedas havll1.9 m~lntalnedfumpnance~ . .
c.~!)~~~ffected 'sLil'face water or '9rQUi1dwat~r'meetlng!itandai-ds,imp_clttedl
ortht~cI~~ned? .... .- .....
CheQ<tll~i#\.Irface waterortfre 9roundwatef~,ox. Accef,s thenameoftherec:elvih9 .. ....
wi3tei'bq4yfrofO tl)e peni'lltor. another statecati! system.(pr a dlfferentaffect;edwateil?9dy
for ao6ripblJ'l~sourcej)r6jectorothei"PrOjettj.iTheiiJ()()klt,uP on the3q3(d) Jm~tred
watersljst,:ol"ohasta~e;'~roundwaters list, trilEiarn If It is l1leetingstandarus, imp#lr~'6r
threatened; or not as~;essed... .. ..... .
d.D6esttil$'projedallow the. systemtp addre$s a TMPJ,.. allocat~ononvater~...~cf
m~ra~~~men~ plan? ... .
BecBlIseTMPL implementation Isincpmplete arid NPDES permits are only renewed eVery ..
flveyg~~/'itwm be necessary to contact the st~teen\llronmental agenc(s TMQL9fflc~.to
lean'llftl1e receiving waterbody has an approv~ TMOL. If Itdoestreferba~totJ::1e
engltieeiibgand environmental documentsJoseelf the CWSRF.fundeclprojeq: reqtJtepthe
speclfledpoHutants .in the TMDL In sometQs~,thrsTMDl,. information wil' alreadyb~
attachedwthe permit. Projects on impainid waters do NOT automaticany address ~.TMDL
In the Chesapeake Bay watershed and others, states are Implementipg watershed
management plans that will prevent the need for aTMDL. Check with1:he appropriate State
office$to peterr:nlne whether the PrOject helpslmplemeht such a plan.
For projects on wateroodles without TMDlsormanagementplans.or for projects ~at do not
help meetlhe goals _ often pollutant-spedfic - of such efforts, check the N/A box, A
project may address both TMDLs and a waterShed. management plan - check both boxes.
Example:
On a nutrient impaired stream, a new wastewater treatment plant replaces a smaller early.
19$05 POTW and the aging septic tanks ofa few subdivisions. In the next few years, its up-
to-date treatment processes will improve pollutant removal effiCiency. Because state or
local plannIng has targeted the area for development, however, the plant Is designed and
pennltted for a higher level of Joadiqgs to the. stream than the existing POlVV . Average
effluent loadings over the lifetime of the plant will be significantly greater than those from
the old POTW,
a. Check the N/A box. The project wlH degrade, not maintain or hnprove, water quality.
b. Check the box for achieves comollimce, since the project willcoinpl"i with stricter permit
limits.. ..
c. The receivlngwaterbody Is Imoali-ed.
d. Although a TMDL has been submitted to EPA for the stream, the permit does not contain
any allocations. The .TMDL program office, however, quotes aprojeded allocation figure
for nutrients that the new faolity..doesineet. .check the oro'ected TMDLallocatlon bOx.
4.
Contribution to protect1onor restor~tiQn cifdesignated,uses~ in the receiving
waterbocly. . . . . .. .. ... .
If the project maintains or Irnprov4;!$ w~terquano/Clr, ilS fntt)e CQs~oftheexClmplef()r
measure 3, IncreaseSeffluentJoadlrlgsblitmeets ItSperm.lt,lt Is contributl natoorotectlon
ofthe :uses you find when matching ponlltants;i!theprojeCt'reduces loadlngsofa ... .
pbllutcititthat is lmpahinga designated lise(303(d)llst), the projed:contributeslo
r~O~~lonQf that use. . . . .
. .
Whll~.$ome project benefits arebetterde~rlb~daslnfrilstrtlcture{mf)n:)ven1ept.l.westlCluld
ri1 a~ean .effort-t6 the extent;tha,ttt)e.do4Jmentationallows--tollnkproject Ijenefit:Stothe
affected waterbodY of the fac:ltlty/syStei:n~' . 'p ... . - ... .....
WhUe It may be obvlouslnspme cases, We. can' systernaticallyUn!<CiptojeGtto .iJ$eSofthe
Ciffecteci waterbCldy . First, h;lelJtifythe: pollut~ntsth<lHheprQje,*:temovesf!Qm~lnfluerit
sew~ge(deslgnand envlrQnmen~IHNlewRPqJnlelJts) and thCitsfloW up Inthewat~
qll~lity criteria for therecelvlr1gWater't;l0!:3Y~s'uses (?later. quaHtystal')darc!s database) and
outoomes. The 'design objectlveSf~r the prqjed:wllt make It clear which pblh.J~nts are
targeted andwllloften mentlonuses/otitc:omes that are driving the projecl;.QJ'lly CTl~rk
lIs~/outcornes that are explicitlyaddressed()r $t/r;Jngly inferreeJby the plal)ningandcle.s19o
cl9Cumenta~lon. If these documents do not spedf'y uses/OlJtcornesi marl(thoseth~tthe
project significantly affects, Fortheclesignatedu~, sp~ryone andonl'yon~primary use
that drives tl'1e water quality goal50f the project, If ,appllcable.n Spedfy "other'" for
additlonaluses, ... .. .. .
. '" Note that EPA will report this measure uslngasurnmary use/outcome list. It may make
sense for states to recDrd the measure usIng theJrown established statedeslgnated uses;
EPA wot.ildthen work With states to equate state uses with EPA reported summary uses.
For the pilot effort, the form wlll prOVide a summary use/outcomelistwith space for states
to enter addltioo.aluses and outcomes.
n If two separate uses more or less equally contribute to the project's goals, make a note,
The electronic form wlH have a separate option for this.
..- .-.. --....- --. ____A ....___ __.. -....--- _.- -.-.-----....-.....-.'.. - --
._._ _.__0'-- ___ ----,-- --- - -- '.-.
For projects that adcjress, for example, a sewag~spill that does not flow Into the receIving
waterbddy, we ~ssutne that the "other public health'" outcome Gltegory Is most: appropriate,
Exarnole: . .
A project renovates a POTWand installs post-secondary chemical phosphorus remoVal
equlpmenttocomply with new TMDL allocations, The receIving waterbody Istemperature
impaired for its deSlgnated \.lse j35 a cold waterfisheryahc! Is alSo bacterla-Impalredfor its
use of prlrnClry c9nfactrecreatjon, The project rec!uceseffluent\oadingsof BOD,TSS,
ammonia, and phosphorus. Because these pollutants areHsted In the Criterlaforthe
recelvlng waterbOdY~s two designated uses, tl1eprcijectprotects bbthuses, BeC9~ethe
TSS redLictlonwilJ affect the listed bacterialmpalrmerit, the projed: contrlbLitesto
re~tPratlon:ofthepr:irn~r:ycontact recreation use. .B.ut because the project did notchan9,e
effluenttemperatpre, it will not be credited with restoringJheco1d water fishery~.- . .
NonetiJ~l~s, theca1d wa~erfishery Is the Prir:naryu$eJort.hls_waterQodybecause Its more
strlngentwat~rqoaHtY ~Iterla .Qrive efforts to reduc:el.oadin9!:- DoT1otmark i3dqltlonaluses
that are noreXplldtlyaddr~$edor stronglYlrifeiT~Jn lhe!:>!.,mning!oesIgn docUmentatIon,
even If project Intprovemei1tSihcldetitally protectlheseuseS (e.g.agrku1tiJre).
~ddttionallmDort~r'!~comments
It Islmpoi-t~nttota!<e eV,ery ~reasonable step to. <;lC(;uratelyllrikJClan dpUa~spent for a
project totf'1e uses!:oll~Fol1"lesthat the projectbel1el'its~WecanrarelYJTieasur~pf()tecti?h
.01" -restoratlonoffi~hlngor recreational uses:on the scaleofaslngleQNSRF ptOj~ .anc:1 the
ass()(:iateo affecti:!dwaterb()dy. state.asslgneddeSigllaleduses and accompaflylngwater .
.q\.lallty criteria allow uS to IInkthe load.lng rec!uctionsfromClCWSRFprQject toflshi'l9,
sWlmmlng,pnd othert;i~of and outcomesforaffectedwa~eJijodies. . .
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ...,"~~.<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,065
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Approve the Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the County
Residential Low (RL) Category to the City Residential Low (RL) Category and Zoning Atlas
Amendment from the County R-3, Single-Family Residential District to the City Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR) District for 1212 Claire Drive (Lot 8, Block A, Stevenson's Heights
Subdivision in Section 10, Township 29 South and Range 15 East); and Pass Ordinance
7618-06, 7619-06 & 7620-06 on first reading.
Summary:
This annexation involves a 0.158-acre property consisting of one parcel, located on the north
side of Claire Drive, approximately 260 feet west of Stockton Drive. The property is contiguous
with the existing City boundaries to the north and west; therefore, the proposed annexation is
consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. The applicant is
requesting this annexation in order to receive sanitary sewer and solid waste service from the
City. It is proposed that the property be assigned Future Land Use Plan designation of
Residential Low (RL) and a zoning category of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR).
The Planning Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the
following standards specified in the Community Development Code:
The proposed annexation will not have anadverse impact on public facilities and their level
of service.
The proposed annexation is consistent withthe City's Comprehensive Plan, the Countywide
Plan and the Community Development Code.
The proposed annexation is contiguous toexisting municipal boundaries, represents a logical
extension of the city boundaries and does not create an enclave.
This annexation has been reviewed by the Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) staff in accordance
with the provisions of Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63, Section 7(1-3), and no objections
have been raised.
Please refer to the attached report (ANX2006-01001) for the complete staff analysis.
The Community Development Board reviewed this proposed annexation at its regularly
scheduled meeting on April 18, 2006 and unanimously recommended approval.
Originating: Planning
Section Quasi-judicial public hearings
Cateqory: Annexations, Land Use Plan and Zoning
Number of Hard Copies attached: 0
Public Hearinq: Yes
Advertised Dates: 04/18/2006
05/18/2006
06/01/2006
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ...,"~~.<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Financial Information:
Review Approval
Steven Brown 04-26-2006 07:33:07
Cvndie Goudeau 05-05-2006 13:47:57
Gina Clavton 04-27-2006 16:00:01
Garrv Brumback 05-04-2006 14:16:07
Leslie Dougall-Sides 04-28-2006 11:29:23
Bill Horne 05-04-2006 20: 12:22
ORDINANCE NO. 7618-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED 260 FEET
WEST OF STOCKTON DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 8, BLOCK
A, STEVENSON'S HEIGHTS, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS
IS 1212 CLAIRE DRIVE, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE
CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY
TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the City
pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable
requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater
and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
Lot 8, Block A, Stevenson's Heights, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat
Book 34, Page 13, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida
(ANX2006-01001)
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with
the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Council hereby accepts the dedication of all
easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public, which have heretofore been
made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the
Planning Director are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official
maps and records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall
file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit
Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption,
and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READI NG AN D ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7618-06
ORDINANCE NO. 7619-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY,
TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED 260 FEET WEST OF STOCKTON
DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 8, BLOCK A,
STEVENSON'S HEIGHTS, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 1212 CLAIRE DRIVE, UPON ANNEXATION
INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL LOW;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable,
proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now,
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City
of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter
described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows:
Property
Lot 8, Block A, Stevenson's Heights, according to
the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 34, Page 13,
Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida
(ANX2006-01 001 )
Land Use Cateqorv
Residential Low
Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent
with the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7618-06.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordi nance No. 7619 -06
ORDINANCE NO. 7620-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY
BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY 260 FEET WEST
OF STOCKTON DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 8, BLOCK
A, STEVENSON'S HEIGHTS, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 1212 CLAIRE DRIVE, UPON ANNEXATION
INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS LOW MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LMDR); PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the
City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is
hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning
atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property
Lot 8, Block A, Stevenson's Heights, according
to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 34, Page
13, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida
(ANX2006-01 001 )
Zoninq District
Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR)
Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in
accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7618-06.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7620-06
ORDINANCE NO. 7620-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY
BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY 260 FEET WEST
OF STOCKTON DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 8, BLOCK
A, STEVENSON'S HEIGHTS, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 1212 CLAIRE DRIVE, UPON ANNEXATION
INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS LOW MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LMDR); PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the
City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is
hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning
atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property
Lot 8, Block A, Stevenson's Heights, according
to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 34, Page
13, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida
(ANX2006-01 001 )
Zoninq District
Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR)
Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in
accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7618-06.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7620-06
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Owner/Applicant:
Location:
Agenda Item:
April 18, 2006
ANX2006-0 1 00 1
Wallace Vinson
1212 Claire Drive
F2
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
REQUEST:
(a) Annexation of 0.158-acres of property to the City of
Clearwater;
(b) Future Land Use Plan amendment from Residential
Low (RL) Category (County) to Residential Low (RL)
Category (City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from R-3, Single-Family Residential District
(County) to Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
District (City of Clearwater).
SITE INFORMATION
PROPERTY SIZE:
6,822 square feet or 0.156 acres
(65 feet wide by 105 feet deep)
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Single-family dwelling
Single-family dwelling
PLAN CATEGORY:
Current Category:
Proposed Category:
Residential Low (RL) (County)
Residential Low (RL) (City)
ZONING DISTRICT:
Current District:
Proposed District:
R-3, Single-Family Residential (County)
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) (City)
SURROUNDING USES:
North: Commercial property
Staff Report - Community Development Board -April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-01001 Page 1
South: Single-family residence
East: Single-family residence
West: City of Clearwater sewer facility
ANALYSIS
This annexation involves a 0.158-acre property consisting of one parcel, located on the north
side of Claire Drive, approximately 135 feet west of Betty Lane. The property is contiguous
with the existing City boundaries to the north and west; therefore, the proposed annexation is
consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. The applicant is requesting
this annexation in order to receive sanitary sewer and solid waste service from the City. It is
proposed that the property be assigned a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Low
(RL) and a zoning category of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR).
I. IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES:
Recommended Findings of Fact
Water and Sewer
The applicant receives water service from the City of Clearwater. The property is currently on
septic and if approved sanitary sewer service will be provided by the City of Clearwater and the
City has adequate capacity to serve this property. The closest sanitary sewer line is located in an
easement along the north side of the parcel. The applicant has not paid the City's sewer impact
and assessment fees and is aware of the additional costs to extend City sewer service to this
property.
Solid Waste
Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The City has an interlocal
agreement with Pinellas County to provide for the disposal of solid waste at the County's
Resource Recovery Plant and capacity is available to serve the property.
Police
The property is located within Police District II and service will be administered through the
district headquarters located at 645 Pierce Street. There are currently 65 patrol officers and nine
patrol sergeants assigned to this district. Community policing service will be provided through
the City's zone system and officers in the field. The Police Department has stated that it will be
able to serve this property and the proposed annexation will not adversely affect police service
and response time.
Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Fire and emergency medical services will be provided to this property by Station #51 located at
1720 Overbrook Avenue. The Fire Department will be able to serve this property. The proposed
annexation will not adversely affect fire and EMS service and response time.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-0 100 I
Page 2
Recommended Conclusions Of Law
The City has adequate capacity to serve this property with sanitary sewer, solid waste, police,
fire and EMS service. The proposed annexation will not have an adverse effect on public
facilities and their levels of service.
II. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: [Section 4-604.F.2]
Recommended Findings of Fact
The Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Future Land Use Plan map
designate the site as Residential Low (RL). It is the purpose of the RL category to depict those
areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a low density
residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that
are consistent with the low density, non-intensive qualities and natural resource characteristics of
such areas. Residential is the primary use in this plan category up to a maximum of five (5)
dwelling units per acre. Secondary uses include Residential Equivalent; Institutional;
Transportation/Utility; Public Educational Facility; Ancillary Non-Residential and
Recreation/Open Space.
The proposed annexation is consistent with and promotes the following objective of the City of
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan:
2.4 Objective - Compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted
through application of the Clearwater Community Development Code.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The property proposed for annexation is contiguous to existing city boundaries and within the
City's urban service area and will be located in the RL category. The proposed annexation is
consistent the City's Comprehensive Plan.
III. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS: [Sections 2-1001.1. & 4-604.F.5.]
Recommended Findings of Fact
The site is currently zoned R-3, Single Family Residential District in Pinellas County. The
applicant proposes to rezone the property to the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
District. Under the current LMDR zoning district provisions, a minimum lot width of 50 feet
and a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet are required. The subject site is 65 feet wide and
6,822 square feet in lot area.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-0 100 1
Page 3
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The subject property exceeds the City's minimum LMDR dimensional requirements and is
therefore consistent with the Community Development Code.
IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTYWIDE PLAN:
Recommended Findings of Fact
There is no change requested in the Countywide Future Land Use Plan designation for the site,
which will remain Residential Low (RL) with a maximum density of 5 dwelling units per acre.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
No change is proposed for the Future Land Use Plan designation of the property proposed for
annexation and the use and density of the property is consistent with the current designation.
V. CONSISTENCY WITH PINELLAS COUNTY:
Recommended Findings of Fact
Pursuant to Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63, the Pinellas Planning Council staff has
reviewed this annexation and determined it complies with all applicable ordinance criteria.
Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63(1)(a) requires that a proposed annexation be both
contiguous to the existing municipal boundaries and compact. This site is contiguous with the
existing City boundaries to the north and west and represents a logical and appropriate extension
of the existing boundaries. The compactness standard requires that the annexation not create an
enclave or a serpentine pattern of municipal boundaries.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The annexation of this property is consistent with this standard and no new enclave will be
created. In summary, the annexation of this property is consistent with Florida law.
VI. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no current code enforcement violations or any code enforcement history on this site.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including sanitary sewer,
solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-0 100 I
Page 4
service level. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan
and is consistent with Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63 regarding voluntary annexation.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following actions on the
request:
(a) Recommend APPROVAL of the annexation ofO.158-acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Recommend APPROVAL of the Residential Low (RL) Future Land Use Plan
classification; and
(c) Recommend APPROVAL of the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning
classification pursuant to the City's Community Development Code.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
Cky Ready, Planner II
Attachments:
Application
Location Map
Aerial Photograph
Proposed Annexation
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Map
Surrounding Uses Map
Site Photographs
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BlAnnexationslANX - 2006IANX2006-0l00ll2l2 Claire Drive Wallace
Residence IANX2005-0l 001 StalL Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-0 100 I
Page 5
1. 1212 Claire Drive
3. facing west from 1212 Claire Drive
2. facing south from 1212 Claire Drive
4. facing east from 1212 Claire Drive
ANX2006-01001
1212 Claire Drive
Wallace Vinson Property
/,
( ,
t" ',)
, / ^'
\, / / "
v / '
/ '
/ I
I /
, /
, I
'~I
c
1'-
I
L,_f
LMDR
1-----------1
'-------______J
I
I
I
I
I
I
____J
/--......,
I \
(I \
I I
\ I
\ /
\ /
............_--/
/.--.......,
/ '\
( \
I \
\ I
\ /
\ /
,.....--/
~Q
( \
\ !
,_/
/--.......,
/ \
( \
I \
\ I
\ /
\ /
,.......--/
/...------.......,
Zoning Map
Owner Wallace Vinson Case: ANX2006-01001
Site: 1212 Claire Drive Property 0.158
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 10-29-15-85446-001-0080
From: RL (County) R-3 (County)
To: RL (City) LMDR (City) A tlas Page: 269B
I
I
I
I
I
I
____J
~Q
( \
\ !
,_/
Owner
Site:
From:
,/'-,
( ,
, ,
, ,
, 1 ^'
\, / / '-
vi'
1 '
1 1
1 /
, 1
"- 1
',I
1-----------1
!...-----______J
--,
/ "-
1 ,
( \
I I
\ I
\ 1
\ /
'......._--/
--,
/ ,
/ "
( \
I I
\ !
\ 1
\ /
,.....--/
/--.......,
/ \
( \
I I
\ I
\ (
\ /
,.......---/
/--......,
/ "
( \
I I
\ !
\ I
\ /
,.....--/
/...------.......,
Proposed Annexation Map
Wallace Vinson
Case:
ANX2006-01001
1212 Claire Drive
Property
Size (Acres):
Land Use
Zoning
PIN: 10-29-15-85446-001-0080
RL (County)
R-3 (County)
To:
RL (City)
A tlas Page:
LMDR (City)
i"l.-
I
L,_f
FAJRMONT ST
WilL --,
I I I
I I ~
I 1"-,
I : a,rJ
r
r
I
L__
0.158
269B
@
2 X 2 Map
Owner Wallace Vinson Case: ANX2006-01001
Site: 1212 Claire Drive Property 0.158
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 10-29-15-85446-001-0080
From: RL (County) R-3 (County)
To: RL (City) LMDR (City) A tlas Page: 269B
Aerial Photograph
Owner Wallace Vinson Case: ANX2006-01001
Site: 1212 Claire Drive Property 0.158
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 10-29-15-85446-001-0080
From: RL (County) R-3 (County)
To: RL (City) LMDR (City) A tlas Page: 269B
p
1'-
I
L,_f
1-----------1
L-----------W A TER
I
I
I
I
I
I
____J
//--......"'\ //--.......,'\
I \ I ,
( I ( I
\,,__TI tJ,__//
~Q
( \
\ !
'_I
/--.......,
/ \
( \
f I
\ I
\ /
\ /
,.......---/
/--......."
I \
( \
f I
I !
\ /
\ /
,.....---/
/...------.......,
Future Land Use Map
Owner Wallace Vinson Case: ANX2006-01001
Site: 1212 Claire Drive Property 0.158
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 10-29-15-85446-001-0080
From: RL (County) R-3 (County)
To: RL (City) LMDR (City) A tlas Page: 269B
/,
( ,
t" ',)
, / ^'
\, / / "
v / '
/ '
/ I
I /
, /
, I
'~I
Comm rial
1-----------1
'-------______J
I
I
I
I
I
I
____J
//--......'\ //--.......,'\
/ j / \
\ I \ I
\,~City 'of//
/Cl-e,arwllt~r
\, Fa9iijty )
,.......---/ ,.....---/
~Q
( \
, I
,_/
/...------.......,
Existing Land Use Map
Owner Wallace Vinson
Case:
ANX2006-01001
Site: 1212 Claire Drive
Property
Size (Acres):
Land Use
Zoning
PIN: 10-29-15-85446-001-0080
From:
RL (County)
R-3 (County)
To:
RL (City)
A tlas Page:
LMDR (City)
1'-
I
L,_f
FAJRMONT ST
WQ.L --,
I I I
I 1;-
I I "* ~-,
1 : a,rJ
r
r
I
L__
0.158
269B
I~D
I~~
ST
w
I~
I~
18
CEnmi
~'~"E3 D []
I 0 DOLb~1
~~dUE!~ ~E C=J c::J I
MAPLE c:::::::: r-I c::==:::J
Dw~ LEE ST
~ ~ PLAZA ~
~ CJD
ST
ENGMAN ST
n8~
Uicr
PALMETTO
I r'.' II
I
~D~D~D
FOREST RD
Location Map
Owner Wallace Vinson Case: ANX2006-01001
Site: 1212 Claire Drive Property 0.158
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 10-29-15-85446-001-0080
From RL (County) R-3 (County)
To: RL (City) LMDR (City) A tlas Page: 269B
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ...,"~~.<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,067
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Approve the Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the County
Residential Urban (RU) Category to the City Residential Urban (RU) Category and Zoning Atlas
Amendment from the County R-4, Single-Family Residential District to the City Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR) District for 1969 N. Betty Lane (Lot 1, Lange's Replat of Brown's
Subdivision in Section 3, Township 29 South and Range 15 East); and Pass Ordinance 7621-06,
7622-06 & 7623-06 on first reading.
Summary:
This annexation involves a 0.234-acre property consisting of one parcel, located on the
southeast corner of Betty Lane and State Street. The property is contiguous with the existing
City boundaries to the north; therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida
Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. The applicant is requesting this annexation in
order to receive solid waste service from the City. It is proposed that the property be assigned a
Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Urban (RU) and a zoning category of Low
Medium Density Residential (LMDR).
The Planning Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the
following standards specified in the Community Development Code:
The proposed annexation will not have anadverse impact on public facilities and their level
of service.
The proposed annexation is consistent withthe City's Comprehensive Plan, the Countywide
Plan and the Community Development Code.
The proposed annexation is contiguous toexisting municipal boundaries, represents a logical
extension of the city boundaries and does not create an enclave.
This annexation has been reviewed by the Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) staff in accordance
with the provisions of Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63, Section 7(1-3), and no objections
have been raised.
Please refer to the attached report (ANX2006-01002) for the complete staff analysis.
The Community Development Board reviewed this proposed annexation at its regularly
scheduled meeting on April 18, 2006 and unanimously recommended approval.
Originating: Planning
Section Quasi-judicial public hearings
Cateqory: Annexations, Land Use Plan and Zoning
Number of Hard Copies attached: 0
Public Hearinq: Yes
Advertised Dates: 04/18/2006
05/18/2006
06/01/2006
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ...,"~~.<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Financial Information:
Review Approval
Steven Brown 04-26-2006 07:34: 18
Leslie Douaall-Sides 04-28-2006 11:31:36
Bill Horne 05-04-2006 20:13:18
Gina Clavton 04-27-2006 14:48:23
Cvndie Goudeau 05-05-2006 13:47: 18
Gina Clayton 04-27-2006 16:00:34
Garry Brumback 05-04-2006 14:17:58
ORDINANCE NO. 7621-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH BETTY LANE AND STATE
STREET, CONSISTING OF LOT 1, LANGE'S REPLAT OF
BROWN'S SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS
1969 NORTH BETTY LANE, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF
THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE
CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the City
pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable
requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater
and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
Lot 1, Lange's Replat of Brown's Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, recorded
in Plat Book 24, Page 74, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida (ANX2006-
01002)
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with
the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Council hereby accepts the dedication of all
easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public, which have heretofore been
made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the
Planning Director are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official
maps and records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall
file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit
Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption,
and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READI NG AN D ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7621-06
ORDINANCE NO. 7622-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY,
TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
NORTH BETTY LANE AND STATE STREET, CONSISTING
OF LOT 1, LANGE'S REPLAT OF BROWN'S
SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1969
NORTH BETTY LANE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE
CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL URBAN;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable,
proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now,
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City
of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter
described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows:
Property
Lot 1, Lange's Replat of Brown's Subdivision,
according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book
24, Page 74, Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida (ANX2006-01002)
Land Use Cateqorv
Residential Urban
Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent
with the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7621-06.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7622-06
ORDINANCE NO. 7623-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY
BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTH BETTY LANE
AND STATE STREET, CONSISTING OF LOT 1, LANGE'S
REPLAT OF BROWN'S SUBDIVISION, WHOSE POST
OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1969 NORTH BETTY LANE, UPON
ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS LOW
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LMDR); PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the
City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is
hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning
atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property
Lot 1, Lange's Replat of Brown's Subdivision,
according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book
24, Page 74, Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida (ANX2006-01002)
Zoninq District
Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR)
Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in
accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7621-06.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7623-06
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Owner/Applicant:
Location:
Agenda Item:
April 18, 2006
ANX2006-0 1 002
Marie Honorat-Telfort
1969 N. Bettv Lane
F3
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
REQUEST:
(a) Annexation of 0.234-acres of property to the City of
Clearwater;
(b) Future Land Use Plan amendment from Residential
Urban (RU) Category (County) to Residential Urban
(RU) Category (City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from R-4, Single-Family Residential District
(County) to Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
District (City of Clearwater).
SITE INFORMATION
PROPERTY SIZE:
10,200 square feet or 0.234 acres
(68 feet wide by 150 feet deep)
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Single-family dwelling
Single-family dwelling
PLAN CATEGORY:
Current Category:
Proposed Category:
Residential Urban (RU) (County)
Residential Urban (RU) (City)
ZONING DISTRICT:
Current District:
Proposed District:
R-4, Single-Family Residential (County)
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) (City)
SURROUNDING USES:
North: Open Space/Recreation area
Staff Report - Community Development Board -April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-01002 Page 1
South:
East:
West:
Single-family residence
Single-family residence
Single-family residence
ANALYSIS
This annexation involves a 0.234-acre property consisting of one parcel, located on the southeast
corner of Betty Lane and State Street. The property is contiguous with the existing City
boundaries to the north; therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida Statutes
with regard to voluntary annexation. The applicant is requesting this annexation in order to
receive solid waste service from the City. It is proposed that the property be assigned a Future
Land Use Plan designation of Residential Urban (RU) and a zoning category of Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR).
I. IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES:
Recommended Findings of Fact
Water and Sewer
The applicant receives water service from the City of Clearwater, and the property is currently
on septic. Sanitary sewer service is not currently available in this area.
Solid Waste
Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The City has an interlocal
agreement with Pinellas County to provide for the disposal of solid waste at the County's
Resource Recovery Plant and capacity is available to serve the property.
Police
The property is located within Police District II and service will be administered through the
district headquarters located at 645 Pierce Street N. There are currently 65 patrol officers and
nine patrol sergeants assigned to this district. Community policing service will be provided
through the City's zone system and officers in the field. The Police Department has stated that it
will be able to serve this property and the proposed annexation will not adversely affect police
service and response time.
Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Fire and emergency medical services will be provided to this property by Station #51 located at
1720 Overbrook Avenue. The Fire Department will be able to serve this property. The proposed
annexation will not adversely affect fire and EMS service and response time.
Recommended Conclusions Of Law
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-0 1002
Page 2
The City has adequate capacity to serve this property with solid waste, police, fire and EMS
service. The proposed annexation will not have an adverse effect on public facilities and their
levels of service.
II. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: [Section 4-604.F.2]
Recommended Findings of Fact
The Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Future Land Use Plan map
designate the site as Residential Urban (RU). It is the purpose of the RU category to depict those
areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in an urban low
density residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential
uses that are consistent with the urban qualities and natural resource characteristics of such areas.
Residential is the primary use in this plan category up to a maximum of seven and one half (7.5)
dwelling units per acre. Secondary uses include Residential Equivalent; Institutional;
Transportation/Utility; Public Educational Facility; Ancillary Non-Residential and
Recreation/Open Space.
The proposed annexation is consistent with and promotes the following objective of the City of
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan:
2.4 Objective - Compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted
through application of the Clearwater Community Development Code.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The property proposed for annexation is contiguous to existing city boundaries and is within the
City's urban service area and will be located in the RL category. The proposed annexation is
consistent the City's Comprehensive Plan.
III. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS: [Sections 2-1001.1. & 4-604.F.5.]
Recommended Findings of Fact
The site is currently zoned R-4, Single Family Residential District in Pinellas County. The
applicant proposes to rezone the property to the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
District. Under the current LMDR zoning district provisions, a minimum lot width of 50 feet
and a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet are required. The subject site is 68 feet wide and
10,200 square feet in lot area.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-0 1002
Page 3
The subject property exceeds the City's minimum LMDR dimensional requirements and is
therefore consistent with the Community Development Code.
IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTYWIDE PLAN:
Recommended Findings of Fact
There is no change requested in the Countywide Future Land Use Plan designation for the site,
which will remain Residential Urban (RU) with a maximum density of 7.5 dwelling units per
acre.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
No change is proposed for the Future Land Use Plan designation of the property proposed for
annexation and the use and density of the property is consistent with the current designation.
V. CONSISTENCY WITH PINELLAS COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 00-63:
Recommended Findings of Fact
Pursuant to Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63, the Pinellas Planning Council staff has
reviewed this annexation and determined it complies with all applicable ordinance criteria.
Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63 requires that a proposed annexation be both contiguous to
the existing municipal boundaries and compact. This site is contiguous with the existing City
boundaries to the north and west and represents a logical and appropriate extension of the
existing boundaries. The compactness standard requires that the annexation not create an
enclave or a serpentine pattern of municipal boundaries.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The annexation of this property is consistent with this standard and no new enclave will be
created. In summary, the annexation of this property is consistent with Florida law.
VI. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no current code enforcement violations or any code enforcement history on this site.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-0 1002
Page 4
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services solid waste, police, fire
and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the service level. The proposed
annexation is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with Pinellas
County Ordinance No. 00-63 regarding voluntary annexation.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following actions on the
request:
(a) Recommend APPROVAL of the annexation of0.234-acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Recommend APPROVAL of the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan
classification; and
(c) Recommend APPROVAL of the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning
classification pursuant to the City's Community Development Code.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
Cky Ready, Planner II
Attachments:
Application
Location Map
Aerial Photograph
Proposed Annexation
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Map
Surrounding Uses Map
Site Photographs
S: \Planning DepartmentlC D BlAnnexationslANX - 2006IANX2006-01002 1969 N Betty Lane Honorat- Telfort
Residence IANX2005-01 002 StalL Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-0 1002
Page 5
1. 1969 N. Betty Lane
3. Facing west from 1969 N Betty Lane
5. Facing south from 1969 N Betty Lane
2. 1969 N Betty Lane
4. Facing north from 1969 N Betty Lane
6. Facing east from 1969 N Betty Lane
ANX2006-0 1002
1969 North Betty Lane
Marie Honorat- Telfort
OS/R
1333
1--
Zoning Map
Owner Marie Honorat-Telfort
Case:
ANX2006-01002
Site: 1969 N. Betty Lane
Property
Size (Acres):
0.234
Land Use
Zoning
PIN: 03-29-15-49986-000-0010
From:
RU (County)
R-4 (County)
To:
RU (City)
LMDR (City)
A tlas Page:
251B
Proposed Annexation Map
Owner Marie Honorat-Telfort Case: ANX2006-01002
Site: 1969 N. Betty Lane Property 0.234
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 03-29-15-49986-000-0010
From: RU (County) R-4 (County)
To: RU (City) LMDR (City) A tlas Page: 251B
~ ~ ~
Location Map
Owner Marie Honorat-Telfort Case: ANX2006-01002
Site: 1969 N. Betty Lane Property 0.234
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 03-29-15-49986-000-0010
From RU (County) R-4 (County)
To: RU (City) LMDR (City) A tlas Page: 251B
Aerial Photograph
Owner Marie Honorat-Telfort Case: ANX2006-01002
Site: 1969 N. Betty Lane Property 0.234
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 03-29-15-49986-000-0010
From: RU (County) R-4 (County)
To: RU (City) LMDR (City) A tlas Page: 251B
RlOS
RlO~3
I
1--
Future Land Use Map
Owner Marie Honorat-Telfort
Case:
ANX2006-01002
Site: 1969 N. Betty Lane
Property
Size (Acres):
0.234
Land Use
Zoning
PIN: 03-29-15-49986-000-0010
From:
RU (County)
R-4 (County)
To:
RU (City)
LMDR (City)
A tlas Page:
251B
Open Space Recreational
1333
1--
Existing Uses Map
Owner Marie Honorat-Telfort
Case:
ANX2006-01002
Site: 1969 N. Betty Lane
Property
Size (Acres):
0.234
Land Use
Zoning
PIN: 03-29-15-49986-000-0010
From:
RU (County)
R-4 (County)
To:
RU (City)
LMDR (City)
A tlas Page:
251B
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ...,"~~.<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,068
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Approve the Petition for Annexation, Future Land Use Plan Amendment from the County
Residential Low (RL) Category to the City Residential Low (RL) Category and Zoning Atlas
Amendment from the County R-3, Single-Family Residential District to the City Low Medium
Density Residential (LMDR) District for 1824 Marilyn Drive (Lot 13, Block G, Carlton Terrace First
Addition Subdivision in Section 5, Township 29 South and Range 16 East); and Pass Ordinance
7624-06, 7625-06 & 7626-06 on first reading.
Summary:
This annexation involves a 0.169-acre property consisting of one parcel, located on the west side
of Marilyn Drive, approximately 280 feet south of Woodring Drive and 320 feet north of
Morningside Drive. The property is located within an enclave and is not contiguous to existing
City boundaries; therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with Pinellas County
requirements with regard to voluntary annexation. The applicant is requesting this annexation
in order to receive sanitary sewer and solid waste service from the City. It is proposed that the
property be assigned a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Low (RL) and zoning
category of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR).
The Planning Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the
following standards specified in the Community Development Code:
The proposed annexation will not have anadverse impact on public facilities and their level
of service.
The proposed annexation is consistent withthe City's Comprehensive Plan, the Countywide
Plan and the Community Development Code.
The proposed annexation is located within anenclave and its annexation will reduce such
enclave.
This annexation has been reviewed by the Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) staff in accordance
with the provisions of Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63, Section 7(1-3), and no objections
have been raised.
Please refer to the attached report (ANX2006-01003) for the complete staff analysis.
The Community Development Board reviewed this proposed annexation at its regularly
scheduled meeting on April 18, 2006 and unanimously recommended approval.
Originating: Planning
Section Quasi-judicial public hearings
Cateqory: Annexations, Land Use Plan and Zoning
Number of Hard Copies attached: 0
Public Hearinq: Yes
Advertised Dates: 04/18/2006
05/18/2006
06/01/2006
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ...,"~~.<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Financial Information:
Review Approval
Steven Brown 04-26-2006 07:35: 12
Leslie Douaall-Sides 04-28-2006 11:34:39
Garry Brumback 05-04-2006 13:37:39
Gina Clavton 04-27-2006 14:49: 16
Leslie Douaall-Sides 04-28-2006 11:35:13
Bill Horne 05-04-2006 20:18:11
Gina Clayton 04-27-2006 16:01:13
Cyndie Goudeau 05-05-2006 13:43: 11
ORDINANCE NO. 7624-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED 280 FEET
SOUTH OF WOODRING DRIVE AND 320 FEET NORTH OF
MORNINGSIDE DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 13, BLOCK G,
CARLTON TERRACE FIRST ADDITION, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 1824 MARILYN DRIVE INTO THE CORPORATE
LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES
OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the City
pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable
requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater
and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
Lot 13, Block G, Carlton Terrace First Addition, according to Plat thereof as
recorded in Plat Book 43, Page 39, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida
(ANX2006-01003)
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with
the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Council hereby accepts the dedication of all
easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public, which have heretofore been
made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the
Planning Director are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official
maps and records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall
file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit
Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption,
and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READI NG AN D ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7624-06
ORDINANCE NO. 7625-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY,
TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED 280 FEET SOUTH OF WOODRING
DRIVE AND 320 FEET NORTH OF MORNINGS IDE DRIVE,
CONSISTING OF LOT 13, BLOCK G, CARLTON TERRACE
FIRST ADDITION, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS
1824 MARILYN DRIVE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE
CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL LOW;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable,
proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now,
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City
of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter
described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows:
Property
Lot 13, Block G, Carlton Terrace First Addition,
according to Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book
43, Page 39, Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida (ANX2006-01 003)
Land Use Cateqorv
Residential Low
Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent
with the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7624-06.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7625-06
ORDINANCE NO. 7626-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY
BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED 280
FEET SOUTH OF WOODRING DRIVE AND 320 FEET
NORTH OF MORNINGS IDE DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT
13, BLOCK G, CARLTON TERRACE FIRST ADDITION,
WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1824 MARILYN
DRIVE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, AS LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(LMDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the
City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is
hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning
atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property
Lot 13, Block G, Carlton Terrace First Addition,
according to Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book
43, Page 39, Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida (ANX2006-01 003)
Zoninq District
Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR)
Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in
accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7624-06.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7626-06
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Owner/Applicant:
Location:
Agenda Item:
April 18, 2006
ANX2006-0 1 003
Shaip Avdullahu
1824 Marilyn Drive
F3
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
REQUEST:
(a) Annexation of 0.169-acres of property to the City of
Clearwater;
(b) Future Land Use Plan amendment from Residential
Low (RL) (County) to Residential Low (RL) (City of
Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from R-3, Single-Family Residential District
(County) to Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
District (City of Clearwater).
SITE INFORMATION
PROPERTY SIZE:
7)50 square feet or 0.169 acres
(70 feet wide by 105 feet deep)
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Single-family dwelling
Single-family dwelling
PLAN CATEGORY:
Current Category:
Proposed Category:
Residential Low (RL) (County)
Residential Low (RL) (City)
ZONING DISTRICT:
Current District:
Proposed District:
R-3, Single-Family Residential (County)
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) (City)
SURROUNDING USES:
North: Single-family residential
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-0 1003 Page 1
South:
East:
West:
Single-family residential
Single-family residential
Single-family residential
ANALYSIS
This annexation involves a 0.169-acre property consisting of one parcel, located on the west side
of Marilyn Drive, approximately 280 feet south of Woodring Drive and 320 feet north of
Morningside Drive. The property is located within an enclave and is not contiguous to existing
City boundaries; therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with Pinellas County
requirements with regard to voluntary annexation. The applicant is requesting this annexation in
order to receive sanitary sewer and solid waste service from the City. It is proposed that the
property be assigned a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Low (RL) and zoning
category of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR).
I. IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES:
Recommended Findings of Fact
Water and Sewer
The applicant receives water service from Pinellas County. Sanitary sewer service will be
provided by the City of Clearwater and the City has adequate capacity to serve this property.
The closest sanitary sewer line is located in an easement along the east side of the parcel. The
applicant has paid the City's sewer impact and assessment fees and is aware of the additional
costs to extend City sewer service to this property.
Solid Waste
Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The City has an interlocal
agreement with Pinellas County to provide for the disposal of solid waste at the County's
Resource Recovery Plant and capacity is available to serve the property.
Police
The property is located within Police District III and service will be administered through the
district headquarters located at 2851 N. McMullen Booth Road. There are currently 56 patrol
officers and seven patrol sergeants assigned to this district. Community policing service will be
provided through the City's zone system and officers in the field. The Police Department has
stated that it will be able to serve this property and the proposed annexation will not adversely
affect police service and response time.
Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Fire and emergency medical services will be provided to this property by Station #49 located on
Sky Harbor Drive. The Fire Department will be able to serve this property. The proposed
annexation will not adversely affect fire and EMS service and response time.
Recommended Conclusions Of Law
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-0 1003
Page 2
The City has adequate capacity to serve this property with sanitary sewer, solid waste, police,
fire and EMS service. The proposed annexation will not have an adverse effect on public
facilities and their levels of service.
II. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: [Section 4-604.F.2]
Recommended Findings of Fact
The Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Future Land Use Plan map
designate the site as Residential Low (RL). It is the purpose of the RL category to depict those
areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a low density
residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that
are consistent with the low density, non-intensive qualities and natural resource characteristics of
such areas. Residential is the primary use in this plan category up to a maximum of five (5)
dwelling units per acre. Secondary uses include Residential Equivalent; Institutional;
Transportation/Utility; Public Educational Facility; Ancillary Non-Residential and
Recreation/Open Space.
The proposed annexation is consistent with and promotes the following objective of the City of
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan:
2.4 Objective - Compact urban development within the urban service area shall be promoted
through application of the Clearwater Community Development Code.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The property proposed for annexation is located within an enclave within the City's urban
service area and will be located in the RL category. The proposed annexation is consistent the
City's Comprehensive Plan.
III. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS: [Sections 2-1001.1. & 4-604.F.5.]
Recommended Findings of Fact
The site is currently zoned R-3, Single Family Residential District in Pinellas County. The
applicant proposes to rezone the property to the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
District. Under the current LMDR zoning district provisions, a minimum lot width of 50 feet
and a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet are required. The subject site is 70 feet wide and
7,350 square feet in lot area.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-0 1003
Page 3
The subject property exceeds the City's minimum LMDR dimensional requirements and is
therefore consistent with the Community Development Code.
IV. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COUNTYWIDE PLAN:
Recommended Findings of Fact
There is no change requested in the Countywide Future Land Use Plan designation, which will
remain Residential Low (RL) with a maximum density of 5 dwelling units per acre.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
No change is proposed for the Future Land Use Plan designation of the property proposed for
annexation and the use and density of the property is consistent with the current designation.
V. CONSISTENCY WITH PINELLAS COUNTY:
Recommended Findings of Fact
Pursuant to Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63, the Pinellas Planning Council staff has
reviewed this annexation and determined that it complies with all applicable ordinance criteria.
Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63(1 )(b) provides for the voluntary annexation of property
that is located within and reduces an enclave on the effective date of the ordinance. The subject
site is located within an enclave, is noncontiguous to city boundaries and reduces the enclave.
Recommended Conclusions of Law
The property proposed for annexation is located within an enclave and its annexation will reduce
such enclave; therefore, the annexation of this property is consistent with Pinellas County
Ordinance No. 00-63.
VI. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no current code enforcement violations or any code enforcement history on this site.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including sanitary sewer,
solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the
service level. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan
and is consistent with Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63 regarding voluntary annexation.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following actions on the
request:
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-0 1003
Page 4
(a) Recommend APPROVAL of the annexation ofO.169-acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Recommend APPROVAL of the Residential Low (RL) Future Land Use Plan
classification; and
(c) Recommend APPROVAL of the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning
classification pursuant to the City's Community Development Code.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
Cky Ready, Planner II
Attachments:
Application
Location Map
Aerial Photograph
Proposed Annexation
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Map
Surrounding Uses Map
Site Photographs
S: \Planning DepartmentlC D BlAnnexationslANX - 2006IANX2006-01003 1824 Marilyn Drive Avdullahu
Residence IANX2006-0 1003 StalL Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - April 18, 2006 - Case ANX2006-0 1003
Page 5
1. 1824 Marilyn Drive
3. facing east from 1824 Marilyn Drive
5. facing north from 1824 Marilyn Drive
2. 1824 Marilyn Drive
4. facing south from 1824 Marilyn Drive
6. 1824 Marilyn Drive
ANX2006-01003
1824 Marilyn Drive
Shaip Avdullahu
Zoning Map
Owner Shaip A vdullahu
Case:
AN X2006-0 1 003
Site: 1824 Marilyn Drive
Property
Size (Acres):
0.169
Land Use
Zoning
PIN: 05-29-16-13554-007-0130
From:
RL (County)
R-3 (County)
To:
RL (City)
LMDR (City)
A tlas Page:
264A
Proposed Annexation Map
Owner Shaip A vdullahu Case: AN X2006-0 1 003
Site: 1824 Marilyn Drive Property 0.169
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 05-29-16-13554-007-0130
From: RL (County) R-3 (County)
To: RL (City) LMDR (City) A tlas Page: 264A
Location Map
Owner Shaip A vdullahu
Case:
AN X2006-0 1 003
Site: 1824 Marilyn Drive
Property
Size (Acres):
0.169
Land Use
Zoning
PIN: 05-29-16-13554-007-0130
From:
RL (County)
R-3 (County)
To:
RL (City)
LMDR (City)
A tlas Page:
264A
Existing Land Uses Map
Owner Shaip A vdullahu Case: AN X2006-0 1 003
Site: 1824 Marilyn Drive Property 0.169
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 05-29-16-13554-007-0130
From: RL (County) R-3 (County)
To: RL (City) LMDR (City) A tlas Page: 264A
Future Land Use Map
Owner Shaip A vdullahu Case: AN X2006-0 1 003
Site: 1824 Marilyn Drive Property 0.169
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 05-29-16-13554-007-0130
From: RL (County) R-3 (County)
To: RL (City) LMDR (City) A tlas Page: 264A
Aerial Photograph
Owner Shaip A vdullahu Case: AN X2006-0 1 003
Site: 1824 Marilyn Drive Property 0.169
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 05-29-16-13554-007-0130
From: RL (County) R-3 (County)
To: RL (City) LMDR (City) A tlas Page: 264A
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ...,"~~.<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,050
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Adopt Ordinance 7607-06 on second reading, annexing certain real property whose post office
address is 3076 Cherry Lane into the corporate limits of the city and redefining the boundary
lines of the city to include said addition.
Originating: City Attorney
Section Second Readings - public hearing
Category: Second Reading
Public Hearing: Yes
Advertised Dates: 04/22/2006
Financial Information:
Review Approval
Pam Akin
04-21-2006
16: 19:09
Cvndie Goudeau
05-04-2006
08:53:31
ORDINANCE NO. 7607-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF CHERRY LANE, APPROXIMATELY 135 FEET
WEST OF MCMULLEN-BOOTH ROAD, CONSISTING OF A
PORTION OF METES AND BOUNDS 22/28 IN SECTION 16,
TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 3076 CHERRY LANE, INTO THE CORPORATE
LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES
OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the property into the City
pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has complied with all applicable
requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of Clearwater
and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
THE EAST 75.00 FT. OF THE WEST 386.05 FT. OF THE NORTH 110.00 FT.
OF THE SOUTH 220.00 FT. OF THE SOUTH % OF THE SOUTHEAST ~ OF
THE NORTHWEST ~ OF THE NORTHWEST ~ OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP
29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST. (ANX2005-12039)
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be consistent with
the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Council hereby accepts the dedication of all
easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the public, which have heretofore been
made by plat, deed or user within the annexed property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the
Planning Director are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official
maps and records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City Clerk shall
file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with the Clerk of the Circuit
Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County, Florida, within 7 days after adoption,
and shall file a certified copy with the Florida Department of State within 30 days after adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READI NG AN 0 ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7607-06
L'--i
I I
l_~- "
"
a
'"
r-Jl
1 ~...I
, ~I
I I'
'"
r-O> -
I a I
I~J
I_J
I a'
I ",I
-l_J
j---I g
I I
-i.._J
Fj
I
~
'"
r-------I
I I
I I
I :
I -,
I I
: I-J
I I
i: 150
L______J
'"
"
a
'"
L"'--,
1--1
'I I
I -I
~I
KENTUCKY AVE
-~,
1-"
L_I
,
_-.J
1--,
I I
I I
I I
I I
1___1
,r-" ....-_
( '\J.._J
t ~200-1
I -,
", I
, I-J
'",,-,-_-,:-~
300
Q
a:::
i:
o
o
lXl
c!:
LI.I
..,J
S
:e
u
:e
.--3'-",
I "
1 12f.)\.'\v\
I, L(......\
LL./ <,_/\
'\.', ('/'\ <"""\,/"^"\ (/..'\ //'^<.}('.......''''
\......) Z'" \, '?\ \'\ ""),\" \ \\
/\.:::.'....~.<;.'z-" ('';~''-\ /~<:....">-,\,.~.:~
) \' \, ,( \ (, 'f ,
\.........f "",-../') ',,,r).\--,,,)',___J>~<..v;
/'--"\".,,,-\ !"',/'-\ ,,/"'\//-,</-, /......\I/~\ (\.
, )" '\' ,., \, \ '( \ "/
'/"/'",'\/ '^ f' ""'" / /,..... ^ t' ^ \. '"
r-II
I I
L..r--J
r---'
~2051
I "
I '
,1207 rl
I I,
1___1
i~2~;:]
I r
I I
1 211~
L I
J \
l_~3'
1--'
11219 :
1 I
Cl217 :
I I
J 2151
, I
I__~
(--I
I 225/
, I
/ I
: 2231
I I
: 221\
1___1
Proposed Annexation Map
Owner
William & Vickie Collins
Site:
3076 Cherry Lane
Land Use
Zoning
From
RU (County)
R-2 (County)
To:
RU (City)
LMDR (City)
Case:
ANX2005-12039
Property
Size (Acres):
0.189
PIN:
16-29-16-00000-220-2800
A tlas Page:
292A
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ...,"~~.<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,051
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Adopt Ordinance 7608-06 on second reading, amending the future land use plan element of the
Comprehensive Plan of the city to designate the land use for certain real property whose post
office address is 3076 Cherry Lane, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as Residential
Urban (RU).
Originating: City Attorney
Section Second Readings - public hearing
Category: Second Reading
Public Hearing: Yes
Advertised Dates: 04/22/2006
Financial Information:
Review Approval
Pam Akin
04-21-2006
16: 19:48
Cvndie Goudeau
05-04-2006
08: 54: 56
ORDINANCE NO. 7608-06
AN ORDI NANCE OF TH E CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE
LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF CHERRY LANE, APPROXIMATELY 135 FEET
WEST OF MCMULLEN-BOOTH ROAD, CONSISTING OF A
PORTION OF METES AND BOUNDS 22/28 IN SECTION 16,
TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST
OFFICE ADDRESS IS 3076 CHERRY LANE, UPON ANNEXATION
INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL URBAN
(RU); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan
of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is
consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of
Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property,
upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows:
Property
THE EAST 75.00 FT. OF THE WEST 386.05 FT. OF
THE NORTH 110.00 FT. OF THE SOUTH 220.00 FT.
OF THE SOUTH % OF THE SOUTHEAST ~ OF THE
NORTHWEST ~ OF TH E NORTHWEST ~ OF
SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST.
(ANX2005-12039)
Land Use Cateaorv
Residential Urban (RU)
Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with
the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and
subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7607-06.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7608-06
I
I
Rtf
I I
l_~- "
"
a
r J
I ~~ igi
l__r) :_J-J
r ~~ r---;g
I (\')1 I IC")
-l_J I I
'-L_J
I
Fj
I
~
'"
r-------I
I I
I I
I :
I -,
I I
I _J
: R/dL
I I
I I
L______~
150
'"
8:
'"
-~,
1--1
'I I
I -I
~J
KENTUCKY A VE
I
....
CI)
>-
~
r-" ....-_
( 'L_J
l ~200-1
/ ~
"
"
" 1-
'''''-L_-':--
-~,
1_"
,_J
-l
_-.J
1--,
I I
I I
I I
I I
1___1
I
RU
300
VE
Future Land Use Map
Owner William & Vickie Collins
Site: 3076 Cherry Lane
Land Use Zoning
From: RU (County) R-2 (County)
To: RU (City) LMDR (City)
I
Q
a:::
1:
o
o
lXl
c!:
LI.I
..,J
S
:e
u
:e
.-_3"'.....,
I "
I 12t'!~<>
~ L ....."'\.
I J" \.
'-l.-S'(,-_/)
,\ ('/\ ,//", 1'/"'-"\.. ('/\ /./"'( <,~'''''
~~)> \\ '\\ >\ ~\ \\
\. '-"\/\. )(~M' v'\......\ \.""vv-> - '\ \. \"'\
'" -n<" /\ /~"\ ,/ \, --'...........
.>"'n \< \( \~/ \
\...........> ,--" \J)\~_/) \__J>'\<,.v.f
(/\''\.v/'''''\\/'''vC''-\\ (/~(/-\.<r-\f'/\("~> <:'
\/....../\. "'/;.\. s'> \. <. \. "".\', ), /~ ~)\ ;. <
iRU
L;-J ~
'"
r---'
r~ 205 1
I ,
I '
[1207 rl
I I,
I___J
..r---I ...---,
: 2131] 11219 I
I r I I
I 'RM] I
1211~ ~2171
..., I I I
J l, ~ I
: 20~ ~ 215 I
~--~ l__J
(--l
I 2251
, I
, I
: 223,'
I [
r 221\
1___1
Case:
ANX2005-12039
Property
Size (Acres):
0.189
PIN:
16-29-16-00000-220-2800
A tlas Page:
292A
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ...,"~~.<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,052
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Adopt Ordinance 7609-06 on second reading, amending the zoning atlas of the city by zoning
certain real property whose post office address is 3076 Cherry Lane, upon annexation into the
City of Clearwater, as Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR).
Originating: City Attorney
Section Second Readings - public hearing
Category: Second Reading
Public Hearing: Yes
Advertised Dates: 04/22/2006
Financial Information:
Review Approval
Pam Akin
04-21-2006
16:20:21
Cvndie Goudeau
05-04-2006
08:55:55
ORDINANCE NO. 7609-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF CHERRY LANE, APPROXIMATELY 135 FEET WEST OF
MCMULLEN-BOOTH ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF
METES AND BOUNDS 22/28 IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29
SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS
3076 CHERRY LANE UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, AS LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(LMDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance
is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive
plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby
zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is
amended, as follows:
Property
ZoninQ District
THE EAST 75.00 FT. OF THE WEST 386.05 FT. OF
THE NORTH 110.00 FT. OF THE SOUTH 220.00 FT.
OF THE SOUTH % OF THE SOUTHEAST ~ OF THE
NORTHWEST ~ OF THE NORTHWEST ~ OF SECTION
16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST. (ANX2005-12039)
Low Medium Density Residential
(LMDR)
Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in
accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon
and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7607-06.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 7609-06
'"
8:
'"
I
r-Jl
I "'"
~
, "
1__1
Jl l-to
~ :~"-
'"
-I
I
I
_I
r-------I
I I
I I
I :
I -,
I I
: I-J
I I
I I
I I
L______J
o
150
.-_3"'.....,
I '
I 12J-)<'>
~ L /''''\.
I J" \.
'-l.-S'(,-_/)
,\ ('/\ ,//", 1'/"'-"\.. ('/\ /./"'( <,~'''''
~ \ > I) \. \. \. \, /' ~ \. "l \.
V fttU~ ,\ ,\~ < \
I' <".." /:::..'("'v>_\ \_) ;:'_>
\.< \( \~/ \
\. ,) ("\ ;> \. f\:) \. \. )~ ,/
\r......> ,--" \,/ V' \.~_// \___-' \\;/
1--1
'I I
I -I
_J
(/\''\.v/'''''\\/'''vC''-\\ ("/~(/-\.</-\f'/\("~> <:'
\. "\./\. /:'\' S'> \. <. \. \\. ), /~ ~)\ ;. <
....
CI)
>-
~
r-" ....-_
( 'L_J
l ~200-1
/ -,
\, I
""'_L_-.:-J-.J
r-1i
I I
L.,--J
IC
,_J
-l
_-.J
1--1
I I
I I
1___1
LMDR
VE
300
..r---I
1--' : 2131]
r~2051 I r
: ~ I 211~
,:20M>>R
I___J ,__"
...---,
I: 219 :
] I
~ 217 I
I I
r I
, 2151
, I
L__---'
(--l
I 2251
, I
r I
: 223,'
I [
r 221\
1___1
Zoning Map
Owner William & Vickie Collins Case: ANX2005-12039
Site: 3076 Cherry Lane Property 0.189
Size (Acres):
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 16-29-16-00000-220-2800
From: RU (County) R-2 (County)
To: RU (City) LMDR (City) A tlas Page: 292A
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ...,"~~.<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,074
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Adopt Ordinance 7616-06 on second reading, establishing the Mobile Home Transition Program;
Amending the Community Development Code; providing a Level Three procedure for
determination that adequate mobile home parks or other suitable facilities exist for the reloation
of mobile home owners; providing for qualifying governmental action; providing for applicant
responsibilities; providing for council action; providing forconditional final decision; providing
standards for review; amending the Code of Ordinances to provide for supplemental rental
assistance payment fund; providing for an alternative mitigation option; providing for rental
assistance payments to eligible individuals.
Originating: City Attorney
Section Second Readings - public hearing
Category: Second Reading
Public Hearing: Yes
Advertised Dates: 05/06/2006
Financial Information:
Review Approval
Pam Akin
04-21-2006
16:21:02
Cvndie Goudeau
05-04-2006
08: 56: 57
ORDINANCE NO. 7616-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER
ESTABLISHING THE MOBILE HOME TRANSITION PROGRAM;
AMENDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, ARTICLE
4, DIVISION 2, GENERAL PROCEDURES, TO ADD
SUBSECTION 4-202A.26; AMENDING COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE, ARTICLE 4, DIVISION 6, TO ADD
SECTION 4-610; PROVIDING A LEVEL THREE PROCEDURE
FOR DETERMINATION THAT ADEQUATE MOBILE HOME
PARKS OR OTHER SUITABLE FACILITIES EXIST FOR THE
RELOCATION OF MOBILE HOME OWNERS PURSUANT TO
FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 723.083; PROVIDING FOR
QUALIFYING GOVERNMENTAL ACTION; PROVIDING FOR
APPLICANT RESPONSIBILITIES; PROVIDING FOR
STATUTORILY REQUIRED COUNCIL ACTION; PROVIDING FOR
CONDITIONAL FINAL DECISION; PROVIDING STANDARDS
FOR REVIEW; CREATING CODE OF ORDINANCES CHAPTER
34, SPECIAL FUNDS, ARTICLE I, SECTIONS 34.01 THROUGH
34.12; PROVIDING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL RENTAL
ASSISTANCE PAYMENT FUND; PROVIDING FOR AN
ALTERNATIVE MITIGATION OPTION; PROVIDING FOR RENTAL
ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS TO ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Chapter 723, Florida Statutes, regulates mobile home park
tenancies and intends to balance the basic property rights of park owners with the
housing needs of mobile home owners renting sites within mobile home parks; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Clearwater (Council) is empowered
under Chapter 166, Florida Statutes, to enact ordinances for the benefit of the safety,
health and welfare of the people of the City; and
WHEREAS, in an attempt to strike an appropriate balance, Section 723.083,
Florida Statutes, specifically restricts the ability of a local government to take any official
action, including rezoning, that would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home
owners residing in a mobile home park without first making an affirmative finding that
there exist adequate mobile home parks or other suitable facilities for the relocation of
mobile home owners; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Legal Affairs, Office of the Attorney General,
specifically found that a finding of adequate or suitable facilities per Section 723.083,
Florida Statutes, "be appropriate to the financial and other needs of the specific
population of mobile home owners"; and
Ordinance No. 7616-06
WHEREAS, the Council finds there is a scarcity of affordable housing in the City
of Clearwater and Pinellas County, which limits the amount of affordable mobile home
parks or other suitable facilities available to mobile home owners subject to removal or
relocation as a result of a mobile home park redevelopment; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that applicants often lack sufficient information
about the financial capacity of individual mobile home owners within the park needed to
allow the Council to determine the existence of adequate or suitable facilities for the
relocation of eligible displaced mobile home owners; and
WHEREAS, the failure of an applicant to provide competent substantial evidence
sufficient to support the Council's requisite finding under Section 723.083, Florida
Statutes, of available adequate or suitable facilities within the financial means of mobile
home owners removed or relocated as the result of a rezoning or other official action,
standing alone, represents a justification for denial of rezoning or other official action;
and
WHEREAS, the recent widespread conversion of mobile home parks to other
uses, and the resulting potential removal and relocation of mobile home owners,
present separate and immediate short-term needs that must be assessed under Section
723.083, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that there exists an essential nexus between the
legitimate City interest of complying with the statutory requirement of ensuring adequate
affordable housing for mobile home owners under Section 723.083, Florida Statutes,
and the voluntary rental assistance payment option set forth in this mobile home
transition program; and
WHEREAS, the Council further finds that there exists the required degree of
connection between the voluntary rental assistance payment option and the ability to
ensure adequate or suitable facilities for mobile home owners impacted as a result of a
park redevelopment; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 723.083, Florida Statutes, the absence of
adequate or suitable facilities for the relocation of eligible mobile home owners
displaced as a result of a rezoning or other official action requires denial of rezoning or
other official action; and
WHEREAS, the Mobile Home Transition Program, as proposed and implemented
herein, is intended to supplement the existing methods by which an applicant can meet
its statutory burden under Section 723.083, Florida Statutes, and this additional
voluntary method will simultaneously assist eligible mobile home owners to secure
adequate or suitable facilities; and
WHEREAS, offering a voluntary rental assistance payment option to the
applicant is specifically designed to address, and substantially relates to, the need to
2
Ordinance No. 7616-06
assure the affordability of adequate or suitable facilities for those mobile home owners
who might be removed or relocated as a result of the governmental action; and
WHEREAS, the availability of such rental assistance option in the manner and by
the procedures provided in this ordinance addresses the needs of the specific
population of mobile home owners who will be removed or relocated by a rezoning or
other official action approval that triggers the provisions of Section 723.083, Florida
Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the Council deems it appropriate for the applicant to set aside an
amount sufficient to ensure the ability of eligible mobile home owners to secure
affordable facilities and maintain affordability for a period of up to two years; and
WHEREAS, less administrative fees, all funds provided by the applicant and not
used to provide rental assistance to individual mobile home owners should be returned
to the applicant; and
WHEREAS, the Council's specific intent is that, regardless of the source of the
funding, any voluntary monies paid to support a Section 723.083, Florida Statutes,
finding are to be paid directly to the City or its designee and not to the individual mobile
home owners, and no funds from the program are to be construed as a payment by the
applicant that would otherwise disqualify the mobile home owner for payment by the
Mobile Home Relocation Corporation provided for under Section 723.0612, Florida
Statutes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, that:
Section 1. The foregoing "Whereas" clauses are hereby incorporated as
legislative findings in support of this Ordinance.
Section 2. The Clearwater Community Development Code, Article 4, Section 4-202,
Applications for Development Approval, is amended by adding subsection A. 26 to read as
follows:
26. If approval of the application would result in the removal or relocation of
mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in Florida
Statutes 723.083, the application must provide information sufficient to show that
adequate mobile home parks or other suitable facilities exist for the relocation of
the mobile home owners. Mobile Home Owners shall be defined as those
persons who own their coach but rent a lot space within the subject property and
are subject to the provisions and protections provided for in Chapter 723, Florida
Statutes. The application shall include the following information:
1. The total number of mobile homes in the park that are owned by mobile
home owners; and
3
Ordinance No. 7616-06
2. Monthly rent charged for each space occupied by a mobile home owner;
and
3. A list of the names and mailing addresses of the present mobile home
owners within the subject property. This list should identify those units that are
suitable for moving and for which only vacant replacement lots will be identified;
and
4. Household profile for each owner-occupied mobile home within the park,
including number of adults, number of children, and whether pets have been
allowed in the park. Replacement units identified should be suitable for similar
household profiles; and
5. A list of other mobile home parks or other suitable facilities with vacant units
available at the time of application that are of a similar cost profile to which
owners residing in the subject property could reasonably expect to relocate. This
list will include, at a minimum, name and address of the park, park contact name
and phone number, the number of vacant spaces available and the cost of those
spaces, park guidelines on age and condition of acceptable units, number of
rental units available and the cost of those rentals. All parks or other suitable
facilities must be located within a ten-mile radius of the subject property and
serve the same age, household, and occupancy profiles as the subject property.
6. Any other information that the Applicant deems necessary to demonstrate
that adequate mobile home parks or other suitable facilities exist for the
relocation of the mobile home owners.
Section 3. The Clearwater Community Development Code, Article 4, Division 6,
is amended by adding Section 4-610 to read as follows:
Section 4-610. Governmental action affecting mobile home owners.
A. Purpose and applicability. It is the purpose of this section to establish a
procedure for determining that adequate mobile home parks or other suitable
facilities exist for the relocation of the mobile home owners pursuant to Florida
Statutes 723.083 (hereinafter referred to as "the Determination"), when an
applicant has filed for rezoning or any other official action that would result in the
removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park
other than a resident-owned park. This section shall apply to any application for
Level One, Two or Three approval that would result in the removal or relocation
of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park other than a resident-
owned park, hereinafter referred to as a Qualifying Official Governmental Action
("QOGA"). Resident-owned parks involved in legally sanctioned and voluntary
applications for changes of zoning are specifically excluded from the provisions
of this ordinance. Level One or Two approvals shall be contingent upon the
4
Ordinance No. 7616-06
Determination required herein. If the Application includes more than one Level
Three approval the hearing shall be conducted concurrently.
B. Application/initiation requirements. An application for Level One, Two or
Three approval that would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home
owners residing in a mobile home park other than a resident-owned park, shall
include such information as is applicable in Section 4-202(A).
C. Staff review and recommendation. After the community development
coordinator has reviewed the application with the development review committee
in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-202(C) and (D), he shall send a
written report and recommendation to the community development board, with a
copy to the applicant, setting forth a recommended Determination of approval,
approval with conditions or denial and the grounds for such recommendation.
D. Community development board review/recommendation. Upon receipt of the
recommendation of the community development coordinator, the community
development board shall conduct a public hearing on the Determination request
in accordance with the requirements of Section 4-206 and issue a recommended
order to the City Council setting forth the board's findings in regard to whether the
applicant has demonstrated that adequate mobile home parks or other suitable
facilities exist for the relocation of the mobile home owners based on the
standards set forth in Section 4-610 G. and may include any proposed
conditions.
E. City Council review/decision. Upon receipt of the recommended order of the
community development board, the City Council shall conduct a public hearing in
accordance with the provisions of Section 4-206. If the Council is satisfied that
the evidence indicates that adequate mobile home parks or other suitable
facilities exist for the relocation of the eligible displaced mobile home owners, it
shall make a finding of such and the condition for approval shall be met. If the
Council is not satisfied that the evidence indicates the existence of adequate
mobile home parks or other suitable facilities for the relocation of the eligible
displaced mobile home owners, the finding shall state such and the QOGA shall
be denied or approved conditionally as provided in subsection F. below.
F. Upon determining that there is a lack of competent substantial evidence to
support an affirmative finding under Section 723.083, Florida Mobile Home Act,
the Council may grant a conditional approval under the following conditions:
1. The Applicant shall deposit monies into the Supplemental Rental
Assistance Payment Fund (Chapter 34, Article I, Code of Ordinances)
for purposes of assuring that rental assistance is available for all
eligible mobile home owners for whom affordable mobile home parks or
other suitable facilities cannot be identified, and
2. The full Supplemental Rental Assistance Payment amount must be
deposited prior to issuance of any permits for the site, and
3. No notice of eviction for change of use of property shall be given or
effective unless the mobile home park owner shall have first paid to the
5
Ordinance No. 7616-06
City an amount equal to the City's actual out-of-pocket cost to qualify
mobile home owners and provide initial counseling times the number of
owner-occupied mobile homes located in the mobile home park as
provided in Article 34 of the Code of Ordinances, and
4. No later than the date the notice of eviction for change of use is given
to mobile home owners, the Applicant will notify mobile home owners of
their rights under Article 34 including possible eligibility for rental
assistance payments if affordable replacement or relocation facilities
cannot be identified.
5. Alternatively, an Applicant may provide an alternative means of
meeting the requirements of Section 723.083 by addressing in a
manner acceptable to the Council any affordability gap, using the
criteria defined herein, between the cost of the identified replacement
unit and the affordable rent as published by the State of Florida's State
Housing Initiative Partnership Program for the mobile home owner's
household income category. Any such alternative means shall meet the
spirit and intent of the Supplemental Rental Assistance Payment Fund.
The granting of such conditional approval pursuant to this section will provide a
presumption that the provisions of Florida Statutes, Chapter 723.083 have been
satisfied.
G. Standards for review.
1 . The proposed Determ ination is consistent with and furthers the goals,
policies and objectives of the comprehensive plan and furthers the
purposes of this Development Code and other city ordinances and
actions designed to implement the plan.
2. The Council shall review all information provided and shall make its
decision based on substantial and competent evidence.
Section 4. The Code of Ordinances of the City of Clearwater is hereby
amended to create Chapter 34 Special Funds, Article I Supplemental Rental
Assistance Payment Fund, to read as follows:
Article I. Supplemental Rental Assistance Payment Fund.
Section 34.01 Purpose.
The Supplemental Rental Assistance Payment Fund ("Fund") is intended
as a resource to assure that affordable mobile home parks or other suitable
facilities will be available for mobile home owners who are removed or relocated
as a result of a rezoning or any other official action as provided in Florida
Statutes 723.083 hereinafter referred to as a Qualifying Official Governmental
Action ("QOGA"). Payments from this Fund do not provide a relocation payment
or any other form of compensation to mobile home owners. If the Applicant for a
QOGA cannot identify adequate mobile home parks or other suitable facilities
6
Ordinance No. 7616-06
that are affordable to the impacted mobile home owners, the payment will be
used to provide temporary rental assistance to qualified mobile home owners.
Section 34.02 Applicabilitv.
An Applicant who has been granted a conditional approval under Section
4-610 of the Clearwater Community Development Code and who has not
provided an alternative means of meeting the requirements of Section 723.083
acceptable to Council, shall make payment into the Fund as provided in this
Article.
Section 34.03 Replacement housinq profile.
The Applicant shall provide information specified below to establish a
replacement housing profile for the mobile home owners residing in the park. For
purposes of this Article "Mobile Home Owners" shall be defined as those persons
who own their coach but rent a lot space within the subject property and are
subject to the provisions and protections provided for in Chapter 723, Florida
Statutes. The following information shall be provided:
1. The total number of mobile homes in the park that are owned by
mobile home owners; and
2. Monthly rent charged for each space occupied by a mobile home
owner; and
3. A list of the names and mailing addresses of the present mobile home
owners within the subject property. This list should identify those units
that are suitable for moving and for which only vacant replacement lots
will be identified in subsection 5 below; and
4. Household profile for each owner-occupied mobile home within the
park, including number of adults, number of children, and whether pets
have been allowed in the park. Replacement units identified in
subsection 5 should be suitable for similar household profiles; and
5. A list of other mobile home parks or other suitable facilities with vacant
units available at the time of application and that are of a similar cost
profile to which owners residing in the subject property could
reasonably expect to relocate. This list will include, at a minimum,
name and address of the park, park contact name and phone number,
the number of vacant spaces available and the cost of those spaces,
park guidelines on age and condition of acceptable units, number of
rental units available and the cost of those rentals. All parks or other
suitable facilities must be located within a ten-mile radius of the subject
7
Ordinance No. 7616-06
property and serve the same age, household, and occupancy profiles
as the subject property.
Section 34.04 Payment into Fund.
A. Calculation of Deposits. The amount to be deposited into the
Supplemental Rental Assistance Payment Fund by the Applicant will be
calculated by the City or its designee using the following methodology:
1. Identify the units occupied by mobile home owners and unit size based
on number of bedrooms; and
2. Identify the weighted average lot rent for owners in the subject mobile
home park; and
3. Identify the weighted average rents for similarly sized rental units in
Clearwater; and
4. The per-unit amount to be deposited is based on the gap between the
weighted average monthly lot rent and the weighted average monthly
rent for similarly sized apartments in Clearwater; and
5. The per-unit amount defined in subsection 4 above, is multiplied by the
number of owners in the subject property, who have not voluntarily
signed a waiver of their Chapter 723.083 protections, and by the 24-
month maximum assistance period; and
6. To determine the total deposit required, the amount calculated in
subsection 5 above is multiplied by a factor of 1.15 to meet
administrative fee requirements.
B. Administrative Fee. Funds deposited with the City to provide rental
assistance payments are subject to a fifteen percent (15%) non-refundable fee to
cover the cost of program administration.
C. Form of Payment. Deposits to the Supplemental Rental Assistance
Payment Fund will be made payable to the City of Clearwater or its designee.
The City or its designee will calculate the deposit amount required based on an
economic profile derived from information provided by the Applicant as provided
herein and other housing cost data. The full Supplemental Rental Assistance
Payment amount must be deposited prior to issuance of any permits for the site.
The deposit may be cash or an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a major
financial institution in favor of the City of Clearwater, in a form approved by the
City or its designee and from which solely the City is authorized to draw upon for
rental assistance as provided herein as needed. Any cash shall be deposited in
an interest-bearing account, with the interest accruing to the benefit of the
8
Ordinance No. 7616-06
Applicant. Any letters of credit shall be for a period of one year provided,
however, that the City may draw on such letter of credit if it is not renewed for an
additional year not later than thirty (30) days prior to its expiration. The Applicant
may substitute cash, in whole or in part, for the letter of credit from time to time.
The letter of credit shall be reduced in amount to the extent that the Applicant
substitutes cash therefore.
D. Advance of Rental Assistance Payment. If Applicant posts a letter of
credit pursuant to Subsection C above, City shall provide Applicant with a good
faith written estimate twenty (20) days prior to commencement of a calendar
quarter of the total amount of rental assistance payments and administrative
costs anticipated to be required for such quarter, less any funds remaining from
prior payments by Applicant. The Applicant shall advance such estimate amount
to the City within ten (10) days of receipt of such estimate, failing which the City
may draw such amount under the letter of credit. If within the ten (10) day period,
Applicant objects in writing to City's estimate, Applicant and City shall meet to try
to resolve the matter within thirty (30) days after Applicant's objection, failing
which the City may draw on the letter of credit.
E. Payment prior to Notice of Eviction. No notice of eviction for
change of use of property shall be given or effective unless the mobile home park
owner shall have first paid to the City an amount equal to the City's actual out-of-
pocket cost to qualify mobile home owners and provide initial counseling times
the number of owner-occupied mobile homes located in the mobile home park.
Such sum shall be used by the City or its designee in determining whether
mobile home owners qualify for rental assistance payments hereunder and shall
be fully creditable against any sums payable pursuant this section.
F. Return of Excess Funds. Any Supplemental Rental Assistance
Payment funds deposited by the Applicant and any interest earned thereon and
not used as rental assistance payments will be returned to the Applicant within
ninety (90) days following the end of the rental assistance period. The
administrative fee is not refundable.
Section 34.05 Housinq Counselinq. Mobile home owners requesting rental
assistance must agree to receive housing counseling services as a prerequisite.
City or its designee will provide individual housing counseling services to
determine the housing needs and level of affordability of the mobile home owner.
Rental assistance payments will be used as a resource only when affordable
mobile home parks or other suitable facilities have not been identified by other
means. Affordable replacement housing may be located for the mobile home
owner without the need for rental assistance. Every attempt will be made to place
mobile home owners onto suitable waiting lists and identify other strategies that
will remove them from the rental assistance program as expeditiously as
practicable.
9
Ordinance No. 7616-06
Section 34.06 Applicant Identification of Replacement Unit. For each mobile
home owner within the subject property who requests rental assistance
payments, Applicant will identify a replacement unit in a mobile home park or
other suitable facility located within ten (10) miles of the subject property.
Replacement units must be decent, safe, and sanitary, and meet Pinellas
County's Housing Quality Standards and City of Clearwater Housing Code.
Nothing herein shall prevent a mobile home owner from accepting a replacement
unit outside the ten-mile radius if the mobile home owner so chooses.
Section 34.07 Supplemental Rental Assistance Payments. Rental assistance
payments are available for qualified mobile home owners for whom affordable
replacement housing has not been identified. The amount of the rental
assistance payment shall be sufficient to cover the gap between the rent of the
identified eligible unit and the mobile home owner's affordability. Affordability will
be based on gross household income, adjusted for household size as defined by
the State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program (SHIP), Section 420.907 et.
seq., Florida Statutes, using the rents published annually for the SHIP program,
adjusted for utilities.
Section 34.08 Eliqibility for Rental Assistance Payments.
In order to be eligible for rental assistance payments, mobile home
owners must meet the following criteria:
(1) Be an eligible owner of a mobile home as defined in Chapter
723, who was renting a space in the subject property prior to
initiation of the QOGA request, and continuing to rent such space
from such date to the filing of a complete application for assistance.
(2) Has not been offered an affordable replacement unit, as defined
herein, in another mobile home park or other suitable facility.
(3) Has an affordability gap, using the criteria defined herein,
between the cost of the identified replacement unit and the
affordable rent as published annually by the State of Florida's State
Housing Initiative Partnership Program for the mobile home owner's
household income category.
(4) Is a full-time resident in good standing as evidenced by being
current in rents and other fees due to the park owner, unless such
rents and other fees are being withheld due to a bona fide Order by
a Court of Law pending resolution of legal action.
(5) Has provided complete and accurate information in the
Application for Rental Assistance described herein.
10
Ordinance No. 7616-06
(6) Has completed the housing counseling prerequisite and
complied with all recommendations provided by the housing
counselors.
Section 34.09 Applications for Supplemental Rental Assistance. Mobile home
owners requesting rental assistance will be required to complete an Application
for Rental Assistance in a form acceptable to the City or its designee within 90
days following receipt of notice to vacate the property or final approval of the
zoning change, whichever is later. Information contained in the application will be
used to determine household affordability and housing need, and should include,
but is not limited to, the following:
(1) Name, age, total gross household income, places of
employment, sources of income, household assets, number of
persons in the household, dates of birth, and social security
numbers; and
(2) Mailing address, residency status, number of bedrooms in the
current mobile home; and
(3) Documentation establishing the applicant as an owner of record
for the mobile home per Chapter 723; and
(4) Monthly or weekly costs of pad rental, park utility fees, and other
charges collected by the park owner from the mobile home owner;
and
(5) Any special needs of the residents of the unit relating to
handicapped accessibility; and
(6) Signed forms authorizing verification of income/asset
information provided.
Section 34.10 Review of Application. Applications will be reviewed by City staff
or its designee to determine the affordability and housing needs of the mobile
home owners. Failure of mobile home owners to provide timely, accurate, and
complete information will make it impossible to determine housing needs and
affordability and may render them ineligible for rental assistance. All applications
are subject to the Public Records Laws of the State of Florida.
Section 34.11 Rental Assistance Payments Are Made to the Lessor. Rental
assistance payments will be made to the Lessor on behalf of the mobile home
owner. No payment will be made directly to any mobile home owner, guardian, or
family member of a mobile home owner.
Section 34.12 Term of Rental Assistance Payments. The rental assistance
payment benefit period must be consecutive and cannot exceed 24 months.
11
Ordinance No. 7616-06
Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or provision of
this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not be construed to render the remaining
provisions of this Ordinance invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Pamela K. Akin
City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
12
Ordinance No. 7616-06
y
:~.
'.. ':"~. .
, .
.~ .. ~. . .'
. .~'.'......,! ~
" ",,"~~'<-'-.
, , .
. . . / ,. I /,
. ~
City Council
nda Cover Memorandum
. ..................................................
Trackinq Number: 2,080
Actual Date: 05/18/2006
Subject / Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution 06-30, amending Development Agreement between City of Clearwater and
Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc..
Summary:
A Development Agreement between the City of Clearwater and Executive Corporation of
Clearwater, Inc. was entered into on May 31, 2005 concerning development of 44.2 acres
formerly known as the Clearwater Executive Golf Course. The Agreement was subsequently
amended by Resolution No. 05-15. The developer has requested a further amendment to
Section 5.1.2 to clarify that the agreement will become effective upon conveyance of the
property to either Beazer Homes Corp. or assigns. The purpose of the amendment is to
accommodate proposed financing arrangements. The City Attorney's Office has reviewed the
amendment and since the proposal does not amend any terms required by statute or Code has
determined that it may be accomplished by Resolution.
Originating: City Attorney
Section City Attorney Reports
Cateqory: Agreements/Contracts - without cost
Number of Hard Copies attached: 2
Public Hearinq: No
Financial Information:
Review Approval
Pam Akin
04-26-2006
08:21:38
Cvndie Goudeau
05-04-2006
09:15:12
RESOLUTION NO. 06-30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, APPROVING AN AMENDED AND RESTATED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER AND EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF
CLEARWATER; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater entered into a Development Agreement with
the Executive Corporation of Clearwater on May 31, 2005, which was subsequently
amended by Resolution No. 05-15; and
WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater is desirous of approving a further amendment
to said development agreement with Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc.; now,
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Amended and Restated Development Agreement between the
City of Clearwater and Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc. a copy of which is
attached as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved.
Section 2. The City Clerk is directed to record the Amended and Restated
Development Agreement with the Clerk of the Circuit Court in Pinellas County no later
than fourteen (14) days after the agreement is executed. The applicant for the
Amended and Restated Development Agreement shall bear the expense of recording
the agreement.
Section 3. The City Clerk is directed to submit a recorded copy of the
Amended and Restated Development Agreement to the State of Florida Department of
Community Affairs no later than fourteen (14) days after the Development Agreement is
recorded.
Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of
,2006.
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Cynthia E. Goudeau
Resolution No. 06-30
Assistant City Attorney City Clerk
2 Resolution No. 06-30
AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
("AGREEMENT") is dated , 2006, effective as provided in Section 5 of this
Agreement, and entered into between EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF
CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida corporation ("OWNER"), and the CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida acting through
its City Council ("COUNCIL"), the governing body thereof ("CITY").
REC!IA!:S:
A. Sections 163.3220 - 163.3243, Florida Statutes, which set forth the
Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act ("ACT"), authorize the CITY to
enter into binding development agreements with persons having a legal or equitable
interest in real property located within the corporate limits of the City.
B. Under Section 163.3223 of the ACT, the CITY has adopted Section 4-606
of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code ("CODE"), establishing
procedures and requirements to consider and enter into development agreements.
C. OWNER owns approximately 44.2 acres m.o.1. of real property
("PROPERTY") in the corporate limits of the City, more particularly described on Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein.
D. OWNER or its successor, desires to develop the Property as a townhome
community, consisting of not more than 280 units, generally conforming to the concept
plan ("CONCEPT PLAN") shown on Sheet 1 of 2 on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and
incorporated herein.
E. The PROPERTY currently has a land use designation of Recreation/Open
Space and is zoned OS/R.
F. In order to develop the PROPERTY, consisting of 44.2 acres, with up to 280
residential units, OWNER has requested that the City place the following on the
PROPERTY: (i) a land use designation of Residential Urban (7.5 units/acre) and (ii) a
zoning designation of MDR (Medium Density Residential).
G. The CITY and OWNER have determined that it would be mutually beneficial
to enter into a development agreement governing the matters set forth herein and have
negotiated this AGREEMENT in accordance with the CODE and the ACT.
H. The CITY has found that the terms of, and future development orders
associated with, this AGREEMENT are consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and
the CODE.
I. On May 31, 2005, the CITY and the OWNER entered into a Development
Agreement, which the parties wish to amend and restate in its entirety as set forth
below.
STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT
In consideration of and in reliance upon the premises, the mutual covenants
contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound and
in accordance with the ACT, agree as follows:
SECTION 1. RECITALS
AGREEMENT.
The above recitals are true and correct and are a part of this
SECTION 2. INCORPORATION OF THE ACT This AGREEMENT is entered into in
compliance with and under the authority of the CODE and the ACT, the terms of which as
of the date of this AGREEMENT are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part
of this AGREEMENT. Words used in this AGREEMENT without definition that are defined in
the ACT shall have the same meaning in this AGREEMENT as in the ACT.
SECTION 3. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THIS AGREEMENT The PROPERTY is subject to this
AGREEMENT.
SECTION 4. OWNERSHIP The PROPERTY is owned in fee simple by OWNER.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE/DuRATION OF THIS AGREEMENT
5.1 This AGREEMENT shall become effective as provided for by the ACT and shall be
contingent upon
5.1.1 Obtaining final approval, and effectiveness of a land use designation of
Residential Urban and a zoning designation of MDR as requested on the PROPERTY;
and
5.1.2 Conveyance by OWNER of the PROPERTY to Beazer Homes Corp., a
Tennessee corporation, or assigns.
5.2 This AGREEMENT shall continue in effect until terminated as defined herein but for
a period not to exceed ten (10) years.
SECTION 6. OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT
2
6.1 Obligations of the OWNER
6.1.1. The obligations under this AGREEMENT shall be binding on OWNER,
its successors or assigns.
6.1.2. At the time of development of the PROPERTY, OWNER will submit
such applications and documentation as are required by law and shall comply with the
City's CODE applicable at the time of development review.
6.1.3.
PROPERTY:
The following restrictions shall apply to development of the
6.1.3.1 The PROPERTY shall be developed substantially in
conformance with the CONCEPT PLAN. The estimated population density and maximum
building intensity are shown on the CONCEPT PLAN. The locations of the ponds and
roads shown on the CONCEPT PLAN are approximate and may change as a result of the
requirements of applicable regulatory agencies or other design considerations.
6.1.3.2
Building height shall not exceed 35 feet (two stories).
6.1.3.3 The architectural style of the townhomes to be constructed
on the Property shall be substantially as shown on the renderings attached hereto as
Exhibit "C."
6.1.3.4 The landscape buffering for the westerly side of the Property
adjacent to existing residential development shall be substantially as described on
Sheet 2 of 2 on Exhibit "B.". Building setbacks shall meet the requirements of the CODE
and may be located in whole or in part within the landscape buffer.
6.1.3.5 The OWNER shall construct at its cost an extension of a turn
lane on Countryside Blvd. as shown on the CONCEPT PLAN and shall post the security
therefor as required by CODE S4-606 G.1.e.
6.1.3.6 The OWNER shall grant (i) a utility easement for water service
five (5) feet on either side of the constructed water lines on the PROPERTY and (ii)
simultaneously with vacation by the CITY of that portion of the easement recorded in
O.R. Book 4223, Page 1502, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, a
replacement easement that relates to the remaining active wells operated by the CITY
on the Property.
6.1 .3.7. The project to be developed on the PROPERTY shall not have
vehicular access to Laurelwood Drive.
6.1.3.8 On the west side of Enterprise Road, the OWNER shall
extend north to the project entrance (+/- 400 feet) the existing SB to WB right turn lane
at the Enterprise Road/Countryside Blvd. intersection, all at the OWNER'S cost.
3
6.1.3.9. The OWNER shall buffer any residential structures located
opposite the entrance to the Tampa Bay Water property to the east with a six foot high
opaque fence, so as to diminish any adverse impact of headlights of vehicles exiting the
Tampa Bay Water property.
6.1.3.9. Egress from the PROPERTY onto Enterprise Road shall permit
only a right out movement. Ingress into the PROPERTY from Enterprise Road shall
perm it right in and left in movements.
6.1.4 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for the PROPERTY,
Owner shall record a deed restriction encumbering the PROPERTY, which deed
restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney (which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld) and which will generally describe the development limitations of
this AGREEMENT. The deed restriction shall be perpetual and may be amended or
terminated only with the consent of the CITY, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
6.2. Obligations of the City
6.2.1 Concurrent with the approval of this AGREEMENT, the COUNCIL shall
promptly process amendments to the land use plan and zoning
designation for the PROPERTY as set forth in Recital F above, all in
accordance with the CODE.
6.2.2 City will approve site and construction plans for the PROPERTY that are
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the CONCEPT PLAN and
that meet the requirements of the CODE.
6.2.3 The City shall consider the vacation of the easement recorded in O.R.
Book 4223, Page 1502, of the Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida.
6.2.4 The final effectiveness of the redesignations referenced In Section
6.2.1. is subject to:
6.2.5.1 The provisions of Chapter 125 and 163, Florida Statutes, as they may
govern such amendments; and
6.2.5.2 The expiration of any appeal periods or, if an appeal is filed, at the
conclusion of such appeal.
SECTION 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES TO SERVICE DEVELOPMENT The following public
facilities are presently available to the PROPERTY from the sources indicated below.
Development of the PROPERTY will be governed by the concurrency ordinance
provisions applicable at the time of development approval. With respect to
4
transportation, the concurrency provisions for the proposed development have been
met.
7.1. Potable water from the CITY.
7.2. Sewer service is currently provided by the CITY.
7.3. Fire protection from the CITY.
7.4. Drainage facilities for the parcel will be provided by OWNER.
7.5 Reclaimed water from the CITY, if available.
7.6. Solid waste from the CITY.
SECTION 8. REQUIRED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERMITS The required local government
development permits for development of the PROPERTY include, without limitation, the
following:
8.1. Site plan approval(s) and associated utility licenses, access, and right-of-way
utilization permits;
8.2. Construction plan approval(s);
8.3. Building permit(s); and
8.4. Certificate(s) of occupancy.
SECTION 9. CONSISTENCY The CITY finds that development of the PROPERTY
consistent with the terms of this AGREEMENT is consistent with the City Comprehensive
Plan.
SECTION 10. TERMINATION
10.1. If OWNER'S obligations set forth in this AGREEMENT are not followed in a timely
manner, as determined by the City Manager, after notice to OWNER and an opportunity
to be heard, existing permits shall be administratively suspended and issuance of new
permits suspended until OWNER has fulfilled its obligations. Failure timely to fulfill its
obligations may serve as a basis for termination of this AGREEMENT by the CITY, at the
discretion of the CITY and after notice to OWNER and an opportunity for OWNER to be
heard.
5
SECTION 11. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS
11.1. Except in the case of termination, until ten (10) years after the date of this
AGREEMENT, the PROPERTY shall not be subject to downzoning, unit density reduction, or
intensity reduction, unless the CITY has held a public hearing and determined:
11.1.1 That substantial changes have occurred in pertinent conditions existing
at the time of approval of this AGREEMENT; or
11.1.2 This AGREEMENT is based on substantially inaccurate information
provided by OWNER; or
11.1.3 That the change is essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
SECTION 12. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW The failure of this AGREEMENT to address any
particular permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve OWNER from the
necessity of complying with the law governing such permitting requirements, conditions,
terms or restrictions.
SECTION 13. NOTICES Notices and communications required or desired to be given
under this Agreement shall be given to the parties by hand delivery, by nationally
recognized overnight courier service such as Federal Express, or by certified mail,
return receipt requested, addressed as follows (copies as provided below shall be
required for proper notice to be given):
If to OWNER:
Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc.
5260 South Landings Drive, Ariel #704
Fort Myers, FL 33919
With copy to:
Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire
Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP
911 Chestnut St.
Clearwater, FL 33756
If to CITY:
City Council of City of Clearwater
c/o City Manager
112 South Osceola Avenue
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33756
Properly addressed, postage prepaid, notices or communications shall be deemed
delivered and received on the day of hand delivery, the next business day after deposit
with an overnight courier service for next day delivery, or on the third (3rd) day following
deposit in the United States mail, certified mail, return receipt requested. The parties
6
may change the addresses set forth above (including the addition of a mortgagee to
receive copies of all notices), by notice in accordance with this Section.
SECTION 14.
INTENTIONALLY OMITTED.
SECTION 15. MINOR NON-COMPLIANCE OWNER will not be deemed to have
failed to comply with the terms of this AGREEMENT in the event such non-compliance, in
the judgment of the City Administrator, reasonably exercised, is a minor or
inconsequential nature.
SECTION 16. COVENANT OF COOPERATION The parties shall cooperate with
and deal with each other in good faith and assist each other in the performance of the
provisions of this AGREEMENT and in achieving the completion of development of the
PROPERTY.
SECTION 17. ApPROVALS Whenever an approval or consent is required under or
contemplated by this AGREEMENT such approval or consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld, delayed or conditioned. All such approvals and consents shall be requested
and granted in writing.
SECTION 18. COMPLETION OF AGREEMENT Upon the completion of performance of
this AGREEMENT or its revocation or termination, a statement evidencing such
completion, revocation or termination shall be signed by the parties hereto and recorded
in the official records of the CITY.
SECTION 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT (including any and all Exhibits
attached hereto all of which are a part of this AGREEMENT to the same extent as if such
Exhibits were set forth in full in the body of this AGREEMENT), constitutes the entire
agreement between the parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof.
SECTION 20. CONSTRUCTION The titles, captions and section numbers in this
AGREEMENT are inserted for convenient reference only and do not define or limit the
scope or intent and should not be used in the interpretation of any section, subsection
or provision of this AGREEMENT. Whenever the context requires or permits, the singular
shall include the plural, and plural shall include the singular and any reference in this
AGREEMENT to OWNER includes OWNER'S successors or assigns. This AGREEMENT was
the production of negotiations between representatives for the CITY and OWNER and the
language of the Agreement should be given its plain and ordinary meaning and should
not be construed against any party hereto. If any term or provision of this AGREEMENT is
susceptible to more than one interpretation, one or more of which render it valid and
enforceable, and one or more of which would render it invalid or unenforceable, such
term or provision shall be construed in a manner that would render it valid and
enforceable.
SECTION 21. PARTIAL INVALIDITY If any term or provision of this AGREEMENT or
the application thereof to any person or circumstance is declared invalid or
7
unenforceable, the remainder of this AGREEMENT, including any valid portion of the
invalid term or provision and the application of such invalid term or provision to
circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not
be affected thereby and shall with the remainder of this AGREEMENT continue unmodified
and in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if such responsibilities of any
party thereto to the extent that the purpose of this AGREEMENT or the benefits sought to
be received hereunder are frustrated, such party shall have the right to terminate this
AGREEMENT upon fifteen (15) days notice to the other parties.
SECTION 22. CODE AMENDMENTS Subsequently adopted ordinances and codes
of the CITY which are of general application not governing the development of land shall
be applicable to the PROPERTY, and such modifications are specifically anticipated in
this AGREEMENT.
SECTION 23. GOVERNING LAW This AGREEMENT shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida without regard to the
conflict of laws principles of such state.
SECTION 24. COUNTERPARTS This AGREEMENT may be executed in counterparts,
all of which together shall continue one and the same instrument.
Section 25. TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The Development
Agreement entered into by the parties on May 31, 2005, is hereby terminated.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto executed this AGREEMENT the date
and year first above written.
[End of Substantive Provisions, Signature Page to follow.]
8
WITNESSES:
Printed Name:
Printed Name:
Countersigned:
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
Approved as to form:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
STATE OF FLORIDA
CITY OF LEE
EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF
CLEARWATER, INC.,
a Florida corporation
By:
S. Lee Crouch
President
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
By:
William B. Horne II
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,
2006, by S. Lee Crouch, as President of EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF
CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation, who D is
personally known to me or who D produced as identification.
Notary Public
Print Name:
9
STATE OF FLORIDA
CITY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
, 2006, by Frank V. Hibbard, as Mayor of the City of Clearwater,
Florida, who D is personally known to me or who D produced
identification.
Notary Public
Print Name:
STATE OF FLORIDA
CITY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
, 2006, by William B. Horne II, City Manager of the City of
Clearwater, Florida, who D is personally known to me or who D produced
identification.
Notary Public
Print Name:
Exhibits:
A Legal Description of Property
B Concept Plan
C Building Elevations
06/23/06 11 :54 AM
45403.108701
#359033 v2 - Beazer/Countryside/Development Agreement (Amended)
10
AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
("AGREEMENT") is dated , 2006, effective as provided in Section 5 of this
Agreement, and entered into between EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF
CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida corporation ("OWNER"), and the CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida acting through
its City Council ("COUNCIL"), the governing body thereof ("CITY").
B .!; ~ ! I 8 .!::: ~:
A. Sections 163.3220 - 163.3243, Florida Statutes, which set forth the
Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act ("ACT"), authorize the CITY to
enter into binding development agreements with persons having a legal or equitable
interest in real property located within the corporate limits of the City.
B. Under Section 163.3223 of the ACT, the CITY has adopted Section 4-606
of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code ("CODE"), establishing
procedures and requirements to consider and enter into development agreements.
C. OWNER owns approximately 44.2 acres m.o.1. of real property
("PROPERTY") in the corporate limits of the City, more particularly described on Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein.
D. OWNER or its successor, desires to develop the Property as a town home
community, consisting of not more than 280 units, generally conforming to the concept
plan ("CONCEPT PLAN") shown on Sheet 1 of 2 on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and
incorporated herein.
E. The PROPERTY currently has a land use designation of Recreation/Open
Space and is zoned OS/R.
F. In order to develop the PROPERTY, consisting of 44.2 acres, with up to 280
residential units, OWNER has requested that the City place the following on the
PROPERTY: (i) a land use designation of Residential Urban (7.5 units/acre) and (ii) a
zoning designation of MDR (Medium Density Residential).
G. The CITY and OWNER have determined that it would be mutually beneficial
to enter into a development agreement governing the matters set forth herein and have
negotiated this AGREEMENT in accordance with the CODE and the ACT.
-0.. no \~"ISfAl
/3. \
H. The CITY has found that the terms of, and future development orders
associated with, this AGREEMENT are consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and
the CODE.
I. On May 31, 2005, the CITY and the OWNER entered into a Development
Agreement, which the parties wish to amend and restate in its entirety as set forth
below.
STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT
In consideration of and in reliance upon the premises, the mutual covenants
contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound and
in accordance with the ACT, agree as follows:
SECTION 1. RECITALS
AGREEMENT.
The above recitals are true and correct and are a part of this
SECTION 2. INCORPORATION OF THE ACT This AGREEMENT is entered into in
compliance with and under the authority of the CODE and the ACT, the terms of which as
of the date of this AGREEMENT are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part
of this AGREEMENT. Words used in this AGREEMENT without definition that are defined in
the ACT shall have the same meaning in this AGREEMENT as in the ACT.
SECTION 3. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THIS AGREEMENT The PROPERTY is subject to this
AGREEMENT.
SECTION 4. OWNERSHIP The PROPERTY is owned in fee simple by OWNER.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE/DURATION OF THIS AGREEMENT
5.1 This AGREEMENT shall become effective as provided for by.the ACT and shall be
contingent upon
5.1.1 Obtaining final approval, and effectiveness of a land use designation of
Residential Urban and a zoning designation of MDR as requested on the PROPERTY;
and
5.1.2 Conveyance by OWNER of the PROPERTY to Beazer Homes Corp., a
Tennessee corporation, or assigns.
5.2 This AGREEMENT shall continue in effect until terminated as defined herein but for
a period not to exceed ten (10) years.
SECTION 6. OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT
2
6.1 Obligations of the OWNER
6.1.1. The obligations under this AGREEMENT shall be binding on OWNER,
its successors or assigns.
6.1.2. At the time of development of the PROPERTY, OWNER will submit
such applications and documentation as are required by law and shall comply with the
City's CODE applicable at the time of development review.
6.1.3.
PROPERTY:
The following restrictions shall apply to development of the
6.1.3.1 The PROPERTY shall be developed substantially in
conformance with the CONCEPT PLAN. The estimated population density and maximum
building intensity are shown on the CONCEPT PLAN. The locations of the ponds and
roads shown on the CONCEPT PLAN are approximate and may change as a result of the
requirements of applicable regulatory agencies or other design considerations.
6.1.3.2
Building height shall not exceed 35 feet (two stories).
6.1.3.3 The architectural style of the townhomes to be constructed
on the Property shall be substantially as shown on the renderings attached hereto as
Exhibit "C."
6.1.3.4 The landscape buffering for the westerly side of the Property
adjacent to existing residential development shall be substantially as described on
Sheet 2 of 2 on Exhibit "B.". Building setbacks shall meet the requirements of the CODE
and may be located in whole or in part within the landscape buffer.
6.1.3.5 The OWNER shall construct at its cost an extension of a turn
lane on Countryside Blvd. as shown on the CONCEPT PLAN and shall post the security
therefor as required by CODE 94-606 G.1.e.
6.1.3.6 The OWNER shall grant (i) a utility easement for water serVice
five (5) feet on either side of the constructed water lines on the PROPERTY and (ii)
simultaneously with vacation by the CITY of that portion of the easement recorded in
O.R. Book 4223, Page 1502, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, a
replacement easement that relates to the remaining active wells operated by the CITY
on the Property.
6.1.3.7. The project to be developed on the PROPERTY shall not have
vehicular access to Laurelwood Drive.
6.1.3.8 On the west side of Enterprise Road, the OWNER shall
extend north to the project entrance (+/- 400 feet) the existing SB to WB right turn lane
at the Enterprise Road/Countryside Blvd. intersection, all at the OWNER'S cost.
3
6.1.3.9. The OWNER shall buffer any residential structures located
opposite the entrance to the Tampa Bay Water property to the east with a six foot high
opaque fence, so as to diminish any adverse impact of headlights of vehicles exiting the
Tampa Bay Water property.
6.1.3.9. Egress from the PROPERTY onto Enterprise Road shall permit
only a right out movement. Ingress into the PROPERTY from Enterprise Road shall
permit right in and left in movements.
6.1.4 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for the PROPERTY,
Owner shall record a deed restriction encumbering the PROPERTY, which deed
restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney (which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld) and which will generally describe the development limitations of
this AGREEMENT. The deed restriction shall be perpetual and may be amended or
terminated only with the consent of the CITY, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
6.2. Obligations of the City
6.2.1 Concurrent with the approval of this AGREEMENT, the COUNCIL shall
promptly process amendments to the land use plan and zoning
designation for the PROPERTY as set forth in Recital F above, all in
accordance with the CODE.
6.2.2 City will approve site and construction plans for the PROPERTY that are
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the CONCEPT PLAN and
that meet the requirements of the CODE.
6.2.3 The City shall consider the vacation of the easement recorded in O.R.
Book 4223, Page 1502, of the Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida.
6.2.4 The final effectiveness of the redesignations referenced in Section
6.2.1. is subject to:
6.2.5.1 The provisions of Chapter 125 and 163, Florida Statutes, as they may
govern such amendments; and
6.2.5.2 The expiration of any appeal periods or, if an appeal is filed, at the
conclusion of such appeal.
SECTION 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES TO SERVICE DEVELOPMENT The following public
facilities are presently available to the PROPERTY from the sources indicated below.
Development of the PROPERTY will be governed by the concurrency ordinance
provisions applicable at the time of development approval. With respect to
4
transportation, the concurrency provisions for the proposed development have been
met.
7.1. Potable water from the CITY.
7.2. Sewer service is currently provided by the CITY.
7.3. Fire protection from the CITY.
7.4. Drainage facilities for the parcel will be provided by OWNER.
7.5 Reclaimed water from the CITY, if available.
7.6. Solid waste from the CITY.
SECTION 8. REQUIRED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERMITS The required local government
development permits for development of the PROPERTY include, without limitation, the
following:
8.1. Site plan approval(s) and associated utility licenses, access, and right-of-way
utilization permits;
8.2. Construction plan approval(s);
8.3. Building permit(s); and
8.4. Certificate(s) of occupancy.
SECTION 9. CONSISTENCY The CITY finds that development of the PROPERTY
consistent with the terms of this AGREEMENT is consistent with the City Comprehensive
Plan.
SECTION 10. TERMINATION
10.1. If OWNER'S obligations set forth in this AGREEMENT are not followed in a timely
manner, as determined by the City Manager, after notice to OWNER and an opportunity
to be heard, eXisting permits shall be administratively suspended and issuance of new
permits suspended until OWNER has fulfilled its obligations. Failure timely to fulfill its
obligations may serve as a basis for termination of this AGREEMENT by the CITY, at the
discretion of the CITY and after notice to OWNER and an opportunity for OWNER to be
heard.
5
SECTION 11. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS
11.1. Except in the case of termination, until ten (10) years after the date of this
AGREEMENT, the PROPERTY shall not be subject to downzoning, unit density reduction, or
intensity reduction, unless the CITY has held a public hearing and determined:
11.1.1 That substantial changes have occurred in pertinent conditions existing
at the time of approval of this AGREEMENT; or
11.1.2 This AGREEMENT is based on substantially inaccurate information
provided by OWNER; or
11.1.3 That the change is essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
SECTION 12. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW The failure of this AGREEMENT to address any
particular permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve OWNER from the
necessity of complying with the law governing such permitting requirements, conditions,
terms or restrictions.
SECTION 13. NOTICES Notices and communications required or desired to be given
under this Agreement shall be given to the parties by hand delivery, by nationally
recognized overnight courier service such as Federal Express, or by certified mail,
return receipt requested, addressed as follows (copies as provided below shall be
required for proper notice to be given):
If to OWNER:
Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc.
5260 South Landings Drive, Ariel #704
Fort Myers, FL 33919
With copy to:
Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire
Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP
911 Chestnut St.
Clearwater, FL 33756
If to CITY:
City Council of City of Clearwater
c/o City Manager
112 South Osceola Avenue
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33756
Properly addressed, postage prepaid, notices or communications shall be deemed
delivered and received on the day of hand delivery, the next business day after deposit
with an overnight courier service for next day delivery, or on the third (3rd) day following
deposit in the United States mail, certified mail, return receipt requested. The parties
6
may change the addresses set forth above (including the addition of a mortgagee to
receive copies of all notices), by notice in accordance with this Section.
SECTION 14.
INTENTIONALLY OMITTED.
SECTION 15. MINOR NON-COMPLIANCE OWNER will not be deemed to have
failed to comply with the terms of this AGREEMENT in the event such non-compliance, in
the judgment of the City Administrator, reasonably exercised, is a minor or
inconsequential nature.
SECTION 16. COVENANT OF COOPERATION The parties shall cooperate. with
and deal with each other in good faith and assist each other in the performance of the
provisions of this AGREEMENT and in achieving the completion of development of the
PROPERTY.
SECTION 17. ApPROVALS Whenever an approval or consent is required under or
contemplated by this AGREEMENT such approval or consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld, delayed or conditioned. All such approvals and consents shall be requested
and granted in writing.
SECTION 18. COMPLETION OF AGREEMENT Upon the completion of performance of
this AGREEMENT or its revocation or termination, a statement evidencing such
completion, revocation or termination shall be signed by the parties hereto and recorded
in the official records of the CITY.
SECTION 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT (including any and all Exhibits
attached hereto all of which are a part of this AGREEMENT to the same extent as if such
Exhibits were set forth in full in the body of this AGREEMENT), constitutes the entire
agreement between the parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof.
SECTION 20. CONSTRUCTION The titles, captions and section numbers in this
AGREEMENT are inserted for convenient reference only and do not define or limit the
scope or intent and should not be used in the interpretation of any section, subsection
or provision of this AGREEMENT. Whenever the context requires or permits, the singular
shall include the plural, and plural shall include the singular and any reference in this
AGREEMENT to OWNER includes OWNER'S successors or assigns. This AGREEMENT was
the production of negotiations between representatives for the CITY and OWNER and the
language of the Agreement should be given its plain and ordinary meaning and should
not be construed against any party hereto. If any term or provision of this AGREEMENT is
susceptible to more than one interpretation, one or more of which render it valid and
enforceable, and one or more of which would render it invalid or unenforceable, such
term or provision shall be construed in a manner that would render it valid and
enforceable.
SECTION 21. PARTIAL INVALIDITY If any term or provision of this AGREEMENT or
the application thereof to any person or circumstance is declared invalid or
7
unenforceable, the remainder of this AGREEMENT, including any valid portion of the
invalid term or provision and the application of such invalid term or provision to
circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not
be affected thereby and shall with the remainder of this AGREEMENT continue unmodified
and in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if such responsibilities of any
party thereto to the extent that the purpose of this AGREEMENT or the benefits sought to
be received hereunder are frustrated, such party shall have the right to terminate this
AGREEMENT upon fifteen (15) days notice to the other parties.
SECTION 22. CODE AMENDMENTS Subsequently adopted ordinances and codes
of the CITY which are of general application not governing the development of land shall
be applicable to the PROPERTY, and such modifications are specifically anticipated in
this AGREEMENT.
SECTION 23. GOVERNING LAw This AGREEMENT shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida without regard to the
conflict of laws principles of such state.
SECTION 24. COUNTERPARTS This AGREEMENT may be executed in counterparts,
all of which together shall continue one and the same instrument.
Section 25. TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The Development
Agreement entered into by the parties on May 31,2005, is hereby terminated.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto executed this AGREEMENT the date
and year first above written.
[End of Substantive Provisions, Signature Page to follow.]
8
WITNESSES:
EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF
CLEARWATER, INC.,
a Florid.. a. c:~~/~ra~ ......".
~ ( ;7//
- BY~ '- ;{'
'. " "\Ql.~~~,<,) S. Lee Crouch
President
~~
~~
Countersigned:
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
By:
Frank V. Hibbard
Mayor
William B. Horne II
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Leslie K. Dougall- id s
Assistant City Attorney
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY
~ OF LEE
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this \~) ~W ~;\
2006, by S. Lee Crouch, as President of EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF
CLEARWATER, INC., a Florid~Gorporation, on b~half of the corporation, who 0 is
personally known to me or who t:iI produced ?L- ~ l. as identification.
:l:r~~~~~ GINGER BARKHAUSEN
, '*- MY COMMIS
........ .;-!~ SION # DO 466230
,:.' ".E. X. PIRES: August 28 2009'
,^.. '.d Thru Notary p ,
""".'~'i< ubl/o Underwriters
~/,. ~
';.;;;ary u~~~~. ------
Print Name:-">c\~? k. '16S;'-'~'(\,-O,:l\O.Ci-/")
\ ~ . \. ..... ;' ",,-. '\." "-'\' , '. t~S...\........
\..'>-.\c. \..'- 'iL \ ~. ".;)~....LL \" ~" .. --.....
9
STATE OF FLORIDA
CITY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
, 2006, by Frank V. Hibbard, as Mayor of the City of Clearwater,
Florida, who 0 is personally known to me or who 0 produced
identification.
Notary Public
Print Name:
STATE OF FLORIDA
CITY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
, 2006, by William B. Horne II, City Manager of the City of
Clearwater, Florida, who 0 is personally known to me or who 0 produced
identification.
Notary Public
Print Name:
Exhibits:
A Legal Description of Property
B Concept Plan
C Building Elevations
05/12/0607:58 PM.
45403.108701
#359033 v2 - Beazer/Countryside/Development Agreement (Amended)
10
[ Deleted: 05/12/0604:53 PM ~
.. ....
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A tract of land lying in Sections 30 and 31, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, City of Clearwater,
PineIlas County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows:
COM1v.fENCE at the West 1/4 Corner of said Section 30; thence run South 0019'55" East, along the
west line of said Section 30, for 444.65 feet; thence South 89055'13" East for 50.01 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING; thence continue S~uth 89055'13" East for 1558.45 feet to a point on the '\Yest line of
"Dunedin Industrial Park" as recorded in Plat Book 64, Page 76, Records of PinelIas County, Florida;
thence South 0004'47" West for 937.36 feet to the southwest corner of said Plat; thence South
89055'13" East, along the south line of said plat, for 247.55 feet to a point on the westerly right-of-
way line of Enterprise Road; thence 16.61 feet aJong t.'J.e said westerly right-of-way line and the arc of
a curve that is concave to the northeast, having a radius of895.00 feet, a chord length of 16.61 feet and
a chord bearing of South 9027'20" EaSt to a.point of compound curvature with a curve that is also
' concave to the northeast; thence 261.09 feet along the arc of said curve having a radiusof330.00 feet,
a chord length of 254.33 feet and a chord bearing of South 32039'10" East to a point of tangency;
thence South 55019'05" East for 345.77 feet to a point of curvature of a curve of a curve that is
concave to the southwest; thence 96.09 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 170.00 feet,
a chord length of 94.82 feet and a chord bearing of South 39007'31" East to a point of tangency; thence
South 22055'56" East for 143.70 feet to a point of curvature of a curve that is concave to the northeast;
thence 286.62 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 405.00 feet, a chord length of 280.68
feet and a chord bearing of South 43012'18" East to a point of reverse curvature with a curve that is
concave to the southwest; thence 1 02.23 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 250.00 feet;
a chord length of 101.52 feet and a chord bearing of South 51045'54" East to a point of compound
curvature with a curye .that is concave to the west; thence 49.17 feet along the arc of said curve having
a radius of 30.00 feet, a chord length of 43.85and a chord bearing of South 6054'15" West to a point of
tangency, the same point being on the northwesterly right-of-way line of Countrysi9-e Boulevard;
thence South 53051'32" West, along said right-of-way line, for 592.43 feet to a point of curvature of a
curve that is concave to the southeast, thence 1059.47 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius
of 1960.00 feet, a chord length of 1046.62 feet and a chord bearing of South 38022'24" West. thence
. , ,
leaving said right-of-way line, North 67006'44" West for 164.15 feet; thence North 10030'36" West for
674.31 feet; thence North 62054'47" West for 114.19 feet to a point on the arc of a curve that is
concave to the northwest; thence 98.14 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 490.00 feet,
a chord length of97.97 feet and a chord bearing of North 21020'58" East; thence South 85055'13" East
for 382.97 feet; thence North 53018'37" East for 254.00 feet; thence North 10004'50" West for 228.53
feet; thence North 36015'14" East for 111.61 feet; thence North 14028'28" West for 444.10 feet; thence
North 58015'59" West for 446.79 feet; thence South 74034'52" West for 206.75 feet to a point on the
arc of a curve that is concave to the southwest; thence 37.09 feet along the arc of said curve' having a
radius of 590.00 feet, a chord length of 37.08 feet and a chord bearing of North Ir13'11" West;
thence North 62012'34" East for288.57 feet; thence North 3059'27" West for 431.05 feet; thence North
44005'26" West for-445.53 feet; thence South 79028'45" West for 983.07 feet; thence North 0019'55"
West for 393.61 feet to the POINT OF BEGll-JNING.
~ ::c
s
i
~~
J:l
,g
';
j j
~
.~ ~ ~ ~
~ .... I>, I>,
,;J ~
-~ ~ ~
~ ,~ ~
\c ~ ~
1 ~ ~
is. e ~
co ::- ~
0: i:. 0:
~"
~
; ...
~
i _:l
..
..
~~ j
~ ~
S ::
cg ~
E ~
E s
"'
~
.ij
~
1
8-
..
0:
..
:s
."
..
..
a
~I
~.II
!! <II
'g! .
_~i ..
i
~
-.::. .a
~ i:l
~ ~
'$ III
,5 8-
'~ e
Uol ~
~
z
~
~
~
..J
"
L~
1I
j
i
"2 s, i
ilHJi .~
j""
:jtH~ !
'fIll" ·
~H'fl ~
tHi1 ~
!~rij ~.
.'1~' ~
1 ! h~ ~ ~
" ~H~': .
~ t~'it: €..
~ !l~~: .Ia
~ ii~i! ;.~
~ ~-~i1.~ ~i
t ~~~~: !;
= i'"~'~ l -
~ ~! ~ i i f~
! H1ti, H
". if,
E h
; i H
i i a
i 4 q
ii i H
~ -; '; l1
!: I to
1; f ip
" . I-~
~; J -(;i
H 1 "H
.~ i b.
a:i i 'It i ~
.~ ~ ..i
; if ~ Hi
I.,: ., j " ; ':: I.
. H ~ ~H
~
~
\:S:
~;
t:Q~
..'-.~
. '.
'\.
''''.
~:Ji':.,~
~
>
-
Eo-
~
u~;z
bJCI}~
><,;;r:j ...q
~' ;;l =- '"
.~ 0 ~!
Q U ~ 1
.... '- u"
rJ) ...J :
~o:7!
Eo-~o
Z U
~
o
u
~:
I'i;
~'
.\
;.i ..:.:",
" ~. .
I
ti
HJ
q~
ht
~~j
.1 g 1
~!~
si~
! ~ i i
~ ; ~ ~
~ ;. ~ ~
~ ~ i::
";l no",!::
i ~i~
~ i 1 ~
. c' 1
'i ';,! ~
: ::i~
fIf i '!!
~,,.,....-,
..
'S
i
f
:.ii
!
II
ijJ
ijlf
II
...
~~
.311
jli II !j;
11--- '\ ..
J
!
-C-C-'d
II
'!
! ...
i j
.nj
Hi
..
~l
=
..
II
miU1
~ "i
III~
~
. ~
Iu ~
ill
II
I
I .
~!
Ii ~!i
iil hi
..~
t
I
, - :!
-. ,
i~ i ~~
:" i -=;1
,~, --- ~ ~ti
" Ii ~l
1=:
,
~~J I
hi I
~!
d
II
I
~
.1
~i e ~ "J
gl ~;l ~;l g
al ~~l, E'~l &
~1 ~~"~, ___
'_u"m_____~, ---II
, " II
,!I _.
-~,
8~
d
~
~
~fll
~, ~
CQ~
..
g
!!
~h
~V
"
r.:l
fI.:l
~'.~
00
UE::
~U
~;
~Q
-~
e-." ,'S=
e~
~:Z
r;r;l :s
~.~
-~
~'.~
~t3
~~
OW
U
..
@
l!
~H
HI
':;1
~
..
t ~!
I
..... r"'1"~
..... \.t ....dl
o ...~
... \ ,,1
::; ~,
r-;N
'I, ~
"
,/ ..'~
t. r~
j1
liS
t:~
I:.
f
~~
t'
!
h
...ll
taS
~.. .
"i
:ii'
~.
~~j
;f!g
lit~..,
$~~B
lIlI..i^
"f'
it~;;
..-g"'''
~2i~
lIg~A
H!~
V"
,.~~
icl;
""il
"~a
~
;;r
:l.j
i2
~'..
~i
y~
!!.
U
~
o
'""l
r-<
~
o
c:
...
EXHIBIT "e"
Page 1 of 2
"T]
a
e
tr1
-
(1)
~
:;::t.
o
=*
n
o
c
~=:s
m~~
t'"'" ~ GfJ
tTj ""'i loooo' ·
<<:0-.
>- ['rj ('D
~z ~
om 0
z~ ~
o
=
CIJ
(t)
6'
e;
tr1
~
et
0'
::I
~
8 .-
-.
~ .~ r 11II
J;,)
'<
Co
S
ft, L__
.. n
. .
. 0
< . ~
i_ .0\ :::s
"Tl M'-
., - ""1 C ~
0 m Z
, ,. ::i r. en
"" ' - -
~ - ~ m ...., _.
; ," ~ ~
';..., .' < <
.' (tl 0
,'1;,. < >- m
",
p;l ~ :z -1
...... -
_. rn
I' ~-~ ;. (' 0 0 0
~ ;:$ Z -i ~
-
., >
" . 1~ I z ::::s
11II ::r'
0
'., C
. , U en
~ c-o
~ ' ;:0
n I
~
...
~ -
n
...
e
c
:::l ,I
Ii
,
.,
I,
II
~ I
EXHIBIT "e"
Page 2 of 2
-I
\;
II