05/14/1990 CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION
May 14, 1990
The City Commission of the City of Clearwater met at City Hall with the following members present:
Rita Garvey Mayor/Commissioner
Richard Fitzgerald Vice-Mayor/Commissioner
Lee Regulski Commissioner
William Nunamaker Commissioner
Sue Berfield Commissioner
Also present were:
Ron H. Rabun City Manager
M. A. Galbraith, Jr. City Attorney
Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk
The Mayor called the meeting to order at 1:16 p.m. and the following items were discussed.
Employee of the Month Award, May 1990 was presented to Christine Keenan, Accounting Clerk III, Police Department.
Solicit Bids for Lighting Retrofit and Energy Management Systems for 17 City facilities (GS)
The proposed program addresses two areas of energy and efficiency - 1) upgrading the quality and efficiency of the indoor lighting system by using reflectors, high efficiency ballasts,
group relamping and limited recircuiting; and 2) installing microcomputer based automated facility management systems in the 17 target buildings will control the mechanical equipment
ensuring minimum operating time as well as optimum temperature control, and will monitor the mechanical equipment ensuring the most efficient operation possible.
Staff is recommending authorization to solicit bids and approval of this agenda item will not authorize the expenditure of funds. The cost of the lighting retrofit and energy management
systems is estimated to be $406,176. The annual reduction in power usage cost is estimated to be $121,252. If a five year amortization is used to retire the costs plus interest, the
cost reduction to departments will be minimal during the five year time frame. The actual cash flow savings to the City can not be determined until the bids are received. It is the
City's intent to solicit financing as part of the management systems bid solicitation process.
Additional cost avoidance will be realized by limiting electrical demand on each building as well as detecting and repairing small maintenance problems before they become large, costly
overhauls. There is a possibility that the City Hall Annex, the Main Police Station and the Main Library will be replaced in the next 5-7 years from the Penny for Pinellas Infrastructure
fund or other funds. Under the anticipated five year amortization of the loan and interest costs, the cost for the lighting retrofit and energy management system for these buildings
will be completely recovered prior to the building being replaced. A major portion of the hardware and software in these facilities would be recoverable and can be moved to the replacement
facilities.
The City Manager indicated that authorizing staff to solicit bids would allow the City to find out whether or not a program such as this is worthwhile.
Concerns were raised regarding whether or not the energy management systems were the answer to the inefficiency problem in some of the buildings. John Peddy, Energy Manager, explained
current inefficiencies, and stated the proposed system would allow a reduction in energy use, as well as provide indicators when maintenance is needed. In response to a question, it
was indicated it would take approximately 90 days to complete the RFP process.
Clearwater Ferry Service License Amendment and Special Events Application for City sponsored function (MR)
On August 2, 1989, the City entered into a license agreement with Clearwater Ferry Service to operate a commercial ferry service in Clearwater Harbor from the Drew Street dock. The
existing agreement states that the operator may transport passengers to and from the City Marina solely to board the Admiral or any substitute dinner cruise operated by or affiliated
with the operator.
Staff is requesting approval of an amendment to the license agreement whereby the operator can transport passengers round-trip, free of charge, from the Drew Street dock to the City
Marina for kick-off day to Safe Boating Week, June 2, 1990. The operator may transport passengers round-trip to the City marina on other special events or City sponsored functions which
have been approved by the City Commission.
Staff is also requesting approval of the special events application for a City sponsored function for kick-off day to Safe Boating Week to be held on June 2, 1990 at the City Marina.
This event is cosponsored by the City, U.S. Coast Auxiliary and U.S. Power Squadron.
Bill Held, Harbormaster, reviewed the events planned for kick-off day. In response to a question, Mr. Held explained that the current agreement does not allow drop-off at the Marina
for any other reason than for those passengers to board the Anderson Dinner Cruise vessel. The amendment will allow drop-off at the Marina for special events.
First Reading Ordinance #4995-90, "Slow Down - Minimum Wake or "Idle Speed - No Wake" Zones amendments (MR)
Establishment of zones for the regulation of the speed of watercraft is found necessary in certain locations because of their size, shape or normal watercraft traffic volumes where
hazards to public health and safety result from the operation of watercraft at excessive speeds. On November 20, 1975, the City adopted Ordinance #1591 establishing no wake zones within
Clearwater Harbor. All regulated speed zones are now required to be approved by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and must have the DNR permit number displayed on the speed
sign. The proposed amendments comply with State requirements for slow down, minimum wake or idle speed, no wake zones. Amendments to the Code are needed to ensure that navigational
requirements are in the best interest of safety for all boaters. The amendments expand existing City no wake zones throughout Clearwater Harbor.
Charlie Hunsicker, Assistant City Manager, reported that the Marine Advisory Board has found these amendments to be consistent with their objectives and recommend approval.
Bill Held, Harbormaster, indicated staff has reviewed all no wake zones in that the zones have to be approved by the State in order for them to be enforced. They have faxed their proposals
to the State and the State has responded with some additional recommendations. He also indicated it will not be necessary to place additional pilings to post the signs as the Coast
Guard will give permission to place signs on their existing poles.
Concerns were expressed regarding the use of the idle speed, no wake zones only allowing the boats to be at enough power to be under way. Concerns were also expressed regarding a no
wake zone being established close to Bay Island and Bay Way as this has always been used as a ski zone, and residents in that area are aware that this was specified as such. It was
requested that an amendment be made to the ordinance that would allow the slow down, minimum wake zone to be in marked channels.
Clearwater Pass Bridge Presentation by Volkert and Resolution #90-18 reconfirming City Commission's desire to proceed with the construction of a new high-level, fixed-span bridge over
Clearwater Pass (PW)
In accordance with the procedural requirements of the United States Federal Highway Administration and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the City of Clearwater held a
public information workshop on January 24, 1990 at the City Hall Annex auditorium. The workshop was held after official legal notice and direct invitation mailed to numerous interested
parties. Material was available and on display which described and depicted the various alternative designs which have been given consideration by the consulting engineers.
A report summarizing the public comments expressed at the workshop has been prepared by David Volkert and Associates. The report reflects an overwhelming preference expressed by the
public for the high level fixed-span option. Although the Florida DOT was made aware of the Commission's preference for the high level fixed-span option following the initial study
in July of 1988, they now require confirmation of that preference.
Jack Roberts, of Volkert and Associates, indicated that 95 people attended the public hearing and that Volkert received 54 responses. The majority favored the high level fixed bridge
option. Mr. Roberts indicated if we are unable to receive permission to move the channel, the low level bascule bridge would be our only option. In response to a question as to why
the City could not reinforce the existing bridge, it was indicated there would be no federal or state funds to assist in a repair, only for replacement of the bridge.
Supplemental Agreement with David Volkert & Associates for professional engineering services to provide a hydraulic mathematical model of Clearwater Pass for $45,332.00 (PW)
In February of 1989 the City entered into a contract with David Volkert and Associates to perform a project development and environmental study for the Clearwater Pass Bridge for a
not to exceed fee of $356,293 and phase preparation of construction plans and specifications for a not to exceed fee of $456,637. The estimated date of completion of both phases was
27 months. In February of 1989 supplemental agreement no. 1 added $43,827 to the contract providing additional information for permitting agencies and extending the contract time to
31 months.
With the completion of the supplemental agreement work providing environmental data to all affected permitting agencies, one agency, the Corps of Engineers, indicated they cannot support
a channel realignment to accommodate a mid-level of high level fixed bridge at this time. The Army Corps position is founded on the belief that additional federal cost would be incurred
to maintain the realigned channel to navigable depths over that amount currently budgeted for maintenance of the existing channel. It is incumbent upon the City to demonstrate through
a modeling process that the expected shoaling and subsequent maintenance costs for a realigned channel would be equal to or less than those costs currently experienced in maintaining
the existing channel. If the City is successful in demonstrating this predicted result through a modeling effort, it is our belief that the Corps would no longer have an objection to
the channel realignment. As the Commission is aware, the construction of a mid-level bascule or high level fixed bridge is dependent upon the realignment of the channel. Without channel
realignment, the high level and mid-level bridge alternatives would not be considered cost effective.
To be responsive to the Corps request for data, we propose to expand the project development and environmental study to include a hydraulic mathematical model study to assess effects
on shoaling due to a channel realignment. The actual work will be performed by Hydrosystems Associates Inc. and performed under the direction of Dr. Bernard Ross. Hydrosystems is highly
qualified to perform this work. Dr. Ross has previously performed a hydraulic study on scouring in Clearwater Pass and is totally familiar with the conditions in the pass.
The Hydrosystems' proposal has been reviewed by David Volkert and Associates and it is their determination it is reasonable based on their understanding of the work effort required.
The proposal requested from Hydrosystems was intended to cover a full range of options currently being considered in this project. Because of the cost, it is recommended that only
Phase I work, and the work for one bridge alignment option in Phase II be approved at a cost of $39,320. The other portions of the proposal are being deferred and will only be recommended
if needed to clarify any additional information for the Corps of Engineers. In addition to the effort expended by Hydrosystems, David Volkert Associates will expend 92 hours
coordinating and incorporating Hydrosystems findings into the project documents as appropriate at a cost of $6,012. The total cost of the supplemental service is $45,332. This work
is essential for gaining approval from the Corps for a realigned channel.
Jack Roberts, representing David Volkert and Associates, stated it is hoped this work will run concurrently with the other design work already being done on the Clearwater Pass Bridge
in order to avoid any further extension of time. In response to questions, it was indicated that actual design work will begin in 1991, and the engineering and other items would be
in 1992.
Request the Florida Department of Transportation to remove parking on North Ft. Harrison Avenue from Jones St. to Myrtle Ave.
In February of 1990, the old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association requested the City of Clearwater approve the removal of parking on N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. A vote of the association
membership resulted in 66 in support, 3 against and two undecided.
During March and April, 1990, the Traffic Engineering Division conducted traffic counts, a parking survey and review of accident reports to evaluate this request. An analysis of the
data collected supports the need to remove the parking. It is the recommendation of the Traffic Engineer that the Commission approve the prohibition of parking on N. Ft. Harrison between
Jones Street and Myrtle Avenue and forward the request to the Florida Department of Transportation to install the signs.
The Police Chief concurs in this recommendation due to the potential to improve the opportunity to control illegal activities along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. Several letters of support
have been received by the City.
In response to a question, it was indicated the City has talked to the neighboring businesses and there is no objection.
Charlie Hunsicker, Assistant City Manager, indicated the survey showed this are is not being used for parking.
A question was raised regarding whether or not the parking is presently allowed in front of the Free Clinic. The Traffic Engineer is to investigate.
Installation of sidewalks on Gulf Blvd. to provide continuous sidewalks from the City limit to Clearwater Pass Bridge, with the City paying up to $2,000.00 (PW)
The City Commission has previously directed that sidewalks be completed along both sides of Gulf Blvd. on Sand Key without direct expenditure by the City. Toward this goal a list of
four properties have been identified where sidewalk had not been installed and plans for installation were not underway. These four tracts are Cedarwood, Ultimar Phase II, the Teatros
property and the Grand Couloir tract (Sheraton Sand Key Resort). All of the owners, except for the Teatros tract, have agreed to install sidewalks. The City has been unable to contact
the owner of the Teatros tract who lives in Ecuador.
A Pinellas County right-of-way permit application for sidewalk installation on all parcels has been submitted to Pinellas County and is awaiting approval. Sufficient quantities to
accomplish the installation of sidewalk at each parcel were included in the contract which was awarded on April 5th to A.T. Moorefield Paving Contractors in the amount of $146,740.
It is possible that a voluntary arrangement can be reached for the installation of sidewalk with three of the above parcel owners. The fourth parcel, the Teatros tract, may require
the City to install the sidewalk directly or by an assessment project using the unit price for four inch sidewalk from the above contract to install a five foot wide sidewalk along the
267 foot frontage of the Teatros tract, costing approximately $2,000.
Two options are available in order to accomplish the installation of the sidewalks. The first is the installation of sidewalk using the assessment method. This method is time consuming
and requires a preliminary hearing with property owners, preparation and adoption of a resolution declaring the City's intent, obtaining of bids, award of contract, preparation of a
resolution establishing assessment roll, advertising and holding public hearing before the City Commission, approval and adoption of the assessment roll by resolution. This procedure
should take approximately six months. The second option is for the City to simply pay for this section of sidewalk which we anticipate will not be completed. This is estimated to be
approximately $2,000.
In response to a question regarding potential damage to sidewalks during development, it was indicated the owners would be responsible for having a damaged sidewalk replaced.
Concerns were expressed that should the City pay for the Teatros tract to be sidewalked, other voluntary installation would be withdrawn by the other developers.
Commission consensus was to revise the item to show approval of instituting the assessment process and that if staff is able to negotiate to have voluntary installation for any of the
sidewalks, that would eliminate the need for the assessment project in that particular area.
Purchase 3.8 acres on Sand Key for $1.6 million with funding to be provided from available open space and recreation impact fees; interest on various impact fees; available balances
in capital improvement projects; and an interest free interfund loan to the general fund by the parking fund (CM)
City staff has been negotiating for several weeks to acquire a 3.8 acre parcel of land on the bay side of Gulf Blvd. on Sand Key. The property is located east of the Ultimar Condominium
site and within easy walking distance of two beach access points.
The original asking price of the site was $1.9 million. The appraised price was $1.4 million and the purchaser/seller agreed upon price is $1.6 million. The City has been receiving
land impact fees from Sand Key developments for several years, and according to City ordinances the funds must be used to purchase parklands within one or one and one-half miles from
the point where the monies were collected.
Parks and Recreation Director, Ream Wilson, believes this site is probably the only available location on Sand Key the Parks and Recreation Dept. could purchase with its available resources.
The land could be developed as either a passive or active park or, in the event of a beach renourishment project, a portion of the property would have value for parking to accommodate
public access. There are no development plans at this time.
Discussion ensued regarding whether or not this was the only parcel available and some suggestion was made that staff look at parcels close to the Sheraton and close to the Gallery
Restaurant.
Michael Wright, Assistant City Manager, indicated he did not bring the complete package to the Commission today as there are still some problems to be worked out. There is some question
regarding possible liens on the property and cross-ownerships. Mr. Wright indicated he did not want to go through protracted negotiations until he was assured of Commission interest
in the project.
Concern was expressed that approval of this item would approve the purchase, and it was the consensus of the Commission that the item be revised to approve in concept.
Proposed agreement to lease property at the Seminole Docks for the purpose of constructing a High & Dry Boat Storage Facility (CM)
Several months ago, the principals of the Clearwater Harbor Marina, Inc. (Meridian Holding Company) approached City staff with the idea of leasing land at the Seminole Docks parking
lot for the express purpose of constructing a dry storage marina.
Staff has been working with the developer to come up with an agreement that is acceptable to the Commission, and during those investigations a question has arisen regarding ownership
of the land. Mike Wright, Assistant City Manager, has indicated that when discussions began there was no reason to believe there was anything wrong with the land; however a question
regarding ownership has arisen. A title search shows that we do not own a small strip of the property which is critical to the proposal. He requested the item be indefinitely continued
until these problems can be resolved.
Commissioner Regulski requested the item remain on the agenda in order to ascertain whether or not the Commission wished to pursue the project any further.
Proposed renaming of Clearwater Airpark (CM)
A letter was received from the Chairman of the Clearwater Airport Authority requesting the Commission consider changing the name from Clearwater Executive Airpark to Clearwater Airpark.
The Commission had no objections to this request and requested this item be placed on the agenda for Thursday night.
Public Hearing & First Reading Ordinances #4970-90, #4971-90 & #4972-90 - Annexation, RM-8 Zoning and a Land Use Plan Amendment to Low Density Residential for a parcel (.71 acre) located
on W side of Bayview Ave., approx. 400' S of Gulf to Bay Blvd., Lame Survey, Tract C (Ciulla/Condino LUP90-5, A90-3) (PLD)
Jim Polatty, Planning Director, indicated this property is presently developed with a level II group care facility which is a conditional use in the RM-8 zoning district.
The Planning and Zoning Board recommends approval of an RS-6 zoning rather than the RM-8 requested. Concerns were expressed regarding approving RM-8 zoning on a small parcel; and it
was indicated if the property were annexed and zoned
RS-6 as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board, the current use would be grandfathered.
Public Hearing & First Reading Ordinances #4973-90, #4974-90 & #4975-90 - Annexation, Zoning and a Land Use Plan Amendment to Residential/Office for Parcel 1 and Low Density Residential
for Parcel 2 for property between Highland Ave. and Braund St., approx. 475' S of Nursery Rd., both parcels in Scotia Heights Subdivision, Blk B, Lots 8 thru 11 (parcel 1), Lots 46 thru
49 (parcel 2) (Wilkes LUP90-4, A90-4) (PLD)
The property is currently developed with a single family residence on each parcel. The applicant is requesting residential/office and OL (limited office) zoning on parcel #1 facing
Highland to permit it to be redeveloped in conjunction with the property to the south which is owned by the applicant's father. Parcel #2 facing Braund Avenue is the residence of the
applicant.
Concerns were expressed regarding allowing more non-residential development on Highland Avenue. A question was raised regarding the schedule for four-laning of that thoroughfare.
Staff is to investigate.
Final Site Plan for Lokey Mercedes (Expansion) located on the W side of US 19, N of Tropic Hills Dr., Lokey Sub., Lots 1 & 2, Sever Park, S 385' of Lot 1, 8.9 acres (PSP89-25)(PLD)
On September 7, 1989, the City Commission reviewed the preliminary site plan for Lokey Mercedes and authorized the Development Review Committee (DRC) to review a final site plan. The
proposed development involves expansion of the dealership on the north and west sides of the site. The DRC reviewed the site plan on October 12, 1989 and a subdivision plat adjustment
with recommended conditions is
presented. The final site plan has been revised in accordance with DRC's recommended conditions. Staff is recommending an additional condition to require unity of title for all parcels
on the site plan to be unified as one development. The subdivision plat adjustment was approved by the City Manager on November 14, 1989.
The applicant's site plan, if all conditions are met, will conform to all City Code requirements except the requirement that a traffic impact study be submitted. This requirement will
be removed from this project once the City Commission adopts the proposed amendments to the Traffic Impact Study ordinance.
Staff recommends that a traffic impact study not be required for this project due to the fact that once the ordinance is changed it will not be required, and also that the development
has been under review for some time, even prior to consideration of the comprehensive plan.
Discussion ensued regarding the access point onto Tropic Hills Drive; and concerns were expressed that, although a letter had been received stating there was no objection, a letter
had also been received indicating that Tropic Hills residents have a major problem with their ingress and egress being on US 19.
Amendments to Community Development Block Grant, 15th Year Final Statement (PLD)
Community Development Block Grant regulations required amendments to the Final Statement whenever activity is added or deleted from the Final Statement. Isaiah's Inn was granted funds
last year, however they have declined use of these funds which were in the public facilities category. Formal action should be taken to delete funding for Isaiah's Inn.
Three other public facility projects - Clearwater Housing Authority Levison Center, Clearwater Housing Authority Fulton Avenue Apartments and the Quest Inn have experienced cost overruns.
The Infill Housing Development program was approved as part of the Housing Issue Paper in early 1990. It is proposed that $245,000 be allocated from current CDBG housing rehab funding
for Infill Housing and that $19,000 be reallocated from this category to fund the Fulton Avenue expenses. This will leave $398,536.00 to be expended for housing rehabilitation.
A question was raised regarding why there was such an increase in administration, and it was indicated that during a transition that Don Jass was hired to assist in administering the
Neighborhood Advisory Committee's programs as well as severance pay having to be paid to employees who have left.
16th Year Community Development Block Grant Application - 1990-91 (PLD)
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has notified the City of the Community Development Block Grant allocation of $697,000 for '90/91. Last year's allocation was $722,000.
When $200,000 of anticipated program income and contingency is added there is a projected $897,000 available for the 16th CDBG year. Comments have been received from the community
and recommended projects and proposals were formally requested.
We received applications for 31 public services and facilities projects. Several agencies including Latchkey did not submit proposals but indicated a desire to receive funds. Proposed
projects have been reviewed by the Neighborhood Advisory Committee. Federal eligibility standards, funding levels and other federal regulations have been observed in the recommendations.
In response to a question, it was indicated the cap on expenditures for social service agencies was 15% or $104,500. In response to a question as to why the YWCA tutoring was cut,
it was indicated the overall grant was reduced and a number of programs took small cuts this year.
Concern was expressed regarding the Neighborhood Advisory Committee meeting, in that, at one point it was advised that no decisions would be made that day. Individuals left the meeting
and the Committee did make decisions. It was explained that in trying to find another date to meet, the Committee found no other available dates and decided to complete the process
that evening.
A concern was expressed that in the Statement of Objectives the objective of expanding economic opportunities principally for lower and moderate income is repeated. It was the consensus
to remove one of these references.
Second Reading of four ordinances relating to concurrency management system: Ord. #4980-90 (traffic impact studies), Ord. #4981-90 (development agreement), Ord. #4982-90 (concurrency)
and Ord. #4983-90 (vested rights) (PLD)
Jim Polatty, Planning and Development Director, reviewed the changes being recommended. He stated the Planning and Zoning Board will be meeting tomorrow to discuss these and he will
report to the Commission regarding their recommendations.
One of the recommended changes is to the "vested rights" ordinance and a suggestion was made that the developments that had submitted applications be vested. A question was raised
regarding what constituted an application. Mr. Polatty indicated he would provide a draft of the administrative procedures manual that would clearly define what would meet these requirements.
Ordinance 4960-90, Amending Section 114 relating to restricted swimming area at Clearwater Beach; providing waiver applications; establishing special operating conditions for vessels;
providing conditions for denial of waiver application and for revocation of waiver.
Amendments are being proposed to the ordinance as a result of the last Commission meeting discussion.
A question was raised regarding why a 30 foot setback for storage had not been included, and it was indicated it would be hard to determine the high water line and that 30 feet was
adjudged to be too great a distance. It was indicated the cap for vessels had been reduced from 35 to 20 and it is now recommended the chase craft not be included in the number of mechanized
vessels allowed. It was requested that "chase vessel" be defined and the requirement that they be clearly identified as such be included in the ordinance.
A concern was raised regarding a parasail operation which is using the intracoastal waterway. The Harbormaster is to investigate.
Other City Attorney Items
The Mayor questioned the status of an ordinance to change the open space land fee radius for collection. Michael Wright, Assistant City Manager, indicated staff had been waiting to
complete the comprehensive plan and the concurrency management ordinances and this would be coming forward with other land development code amendments in the near future.
Verbal Reports
Legislative Update
Kathy Rice, Assistant City Manager, stated there were several bills that need attention and support of position from the Commission. She stated the AIDS Bill is still pending which
would provide a presumption of a job connected disability for any firefighter or EMS employee who contracts AIDS or hepatitis. She sated they are also considering adding police officers
to this bill.
She stated there is still the possibility that the sovereign immunity cap will be raised and it is necessary to call Senator Kaiser to express our opposition to this bill. The three
percent tax on the one-half cent sales tax fund is not in a bill currently but it could come back. She stated the education siting bill is a major concern, particularly for school board
ancillary activity such as bus barns. A question was raised regarding the School Board purchasing a part of Camp Soule, and it was indicated the Commission had been sent a memo asking
if they had any objection to this.
Ms. Rice reported there was nothing in the works yet regarding billboard legislation, however billboard representatives were in Tallahassee last week.
The City Manager requested an indication from Commission members as to those who wish to attend the Florida League of Cities conference in Orlando October 10-13, 1990. Mayor Garvey,
Commissioners Fitzgerald and Berfield indicated they would be attending.
Mr. Rabun indicated he would be making a decision regarding attending the National League of Cities or the ICMA Conference which will be held at approximately the same time later in
the year.
The Budget Advisory Committee is seeking direction from the Commission regarding what issues the Commission wishes them to pursue at this time. Consensus was this is not the time for
the Budget Advisory Committee to be researching the possible sale of the Gas Division; but rather the Commission would prefer input regarding the 1990/91 budget.
Resolution 90-19, Supporting Beach Renourishment
Concerns were expressed that the resolution cited the need for tourist and recreational area as well as citing the specific project for Indian Shores. It was indicated the resolution
was the result of a request from Indian Shores and that Pinellas County will be using tourist development taxes for this project and, therefore, there is the need to tie it to tourism.
Consensus of the Commission was to leave in the references to tourism and recreation, however, to remove the reference to Indian Shores.
Other Commission Action
Commissioner Fitzgerald reported he had attended the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Committee meeting that morning and stated the four items regarding land use plan amendments for Clearwater
were approved as recommended by Clearwater. He stated they also approved a transportation enhancement sharing option and provided a copy to the City Manager for distribution to the
Commission.
The meeting adjourned at 4:48 p.m