The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2013-09033Y �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD �� t,�.,,_�.,�,_��,. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT � `� ��`��`� STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: CASE: REQUEST: February 18, 2014 E.2. FLD2013-09033 Flexible Development approval to allow a non-residential off-street parking lot in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a front (west) setback of 10 feet (to pavement) and 13 non-residential off-street parking spaces as a Residential Infill Project pursuant to Section 2-204.E. as well as a reduction to the width of the south perimeter landscape buffer from ten feet to 6.1 feet; a reduction to the width dimension of one interior landscape island from eight feet curb to curb to 3.1 feet curb to curb as a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3-1402.G. GENERAL DATA: Agent ......................... .. Randy Marks Applicant/ Owner .. .. . ........ Gilbert Jannelli Location .......................... 1411 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard; The subject property is located on the east side of South Hillcrest Avenue at the intersection of South Hillcrest Avenue and Pierce Street. Property Size .................... 0.70 acres (C District: 0.41 acres) (MDR District: 0.26 acres) Futur'e Land Use Plan...... Commercial General (CG) Residential Medium (RM) Zoning ................. ......... Commercial (C) District; Medium Density Residential (MDR) Adjacent Zoning.... North: Medium Density Residential (MDR) & Commercial (C) District South: Medium Density Residential (MDR) & Commercial (C) District East: Commercial (C) District West: Medium Density Residential (LMDR) Existing Land Use ............. Vacant land ProposP� L�nd Use Non-residential off-street parking . - � „� - - N , , ; , � _ ... , . �� _ � ��. �� . -t `;� � � " . �� . � � = at_ � - �. , � � � �� ,�st �.. ' � .� . J r � r�ii � 1 �� . � . , , r W s`� ` ' + " � m ��' `9`� S � � 4 „� - � � � ��, , s F .< "� 3 y ° � , .� , r �'r+ �� ,. ,� . � � `� " � } �! � < . .- • , _ � �� 1 �' ,' `� � � ^�„ � � „� � :�'� , . �t �r� �� ' � m a • � � �� 'ti � �� .. _ � 1 �.� ' °. ti� � ' �' f t� � . * '� �. v',� J �' 3 � +� � � Y � ' �,l � "" �� m' � I �,I . . . ' s . , . y.:; ��' �.� L #� }.,4� f�y+� . � J i� .�y � •.+ �� . � .9 � � .. . ' � �' � a . ' � . . . .. . �/�l� �:_:. .. C r . . �l , s � �6 �� 4� � '� .�� f �� . "�4 �.+�. � � _ Yl;l . g ,,° a�r . ' ,' �^ ;�' � :�l �f ° 4 ��'-� � >�� ,. � ��,�, ,` � ,w . � �. ,� � � 1} 'i� { b, `� s / �f �� `� i -, y .� <�.x �: ,N .q".✓ , �... !l` � � � � = Cleara7�l�� Level II Flexible Development Application Review - -.`-�`^-�'"`-„" �- — - - - -- ,. � 4��. :«:�§�.�s f .. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.70-acre subject property is located on the east side of South Hillcrest Avenue at the intersection of Pierce Street and South Hillcrest Avenue with 128 feet of frontage along South Hillcrest Avenue and 145 feet of frontage along Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The property spans both the Commercial (C) and Medium Density Residential (MDR) Districts and their corresponding Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) classifications, Commercial General (CG) and Residential Medium (RM), respectively. It should be noted that only that portion of the property within the MDR District is being considered with this application. That portion of the property zoned MDR consists of a dilapidated parking area previously associated with the restaurant use located on the C zoned portion of the property. That property consists of a two-story building with a height of 25.6 feet and a floor area of 7,395 square feet (4,620 square feet - first floor; 2,755 square feet - second floor). The interior of this building was recently renovated for a retail sales and service use (day care) under BCP2013-09071. The property has two driveways onto South Hillcrest Avenue and one driveway onto Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The adjacent properties to the north and south consist of attached and detached dwellings. The properties across South Hillcrest Drive also consist of a mix of detached and attached dwellings. There a number of commercial properties in the immediate area that consists of office, retail sales and service, and overnight accommodation uses. There are also a number of vacant commercial buildings in proximity of the property along Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Development Proposal: The request only consists of allowing a non- residential parking lot within the land area zoned MDR District. In the latter half of last year, the commercially zoned building previously used as a restaurant was approved to be used as a day care (day care is defined as a retail sales and service use). This � � �,� . i__ �;�-- - � R I p&fi 8: �;I �j F� � �� A i !�i j=i , I • � ,,. „.� ��iM� I � � ° p � .� �� ,� �' ��.� .� e;•.. • ,n t PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION - i _ I _� - _ �i g� s �! sr- .. _ _ -,_ - g s � � A�R � t@s _ :,� � r�� p � , ,•t� ? ,., ";� ,c � � n'� I ' ;�� `�� i , �'� J '� '` i I .f i $€� �.:1: � $: �;' .� __ _ � `�• � � '°° ��€��s?€�T�o �� r !. � ' ZONING MAP ' � � � � �,��ST ? � � �i i - - , - _ � ' __ l� C � �I.EY�Q„IJ� 51 --- I = - � _ _ _ � ' � - I - aao.,Ear a$ I �__ FARK9T .. -_ - �;pERCE3T I � � I PIERCE3T - -- L�,_ i ir � � ' FRANIQW ST x _ � Fk,WKLIN9T � - - � - .�_- __ " r __ __ � � p _-" r � . OELE(kJST �� -- g - �(� q ::�.� Q ___ '� I ..... . � � SAN JUAN f.T � . ; �_ ; --- � — __ ! CCAMTST y _ . _. __. 3 -___ ... __ � i — __ _ _ � - �� _ ;� LOCATI Community Development Board — February 18, 2014 FLD2013-09033 — Page 2 of 11 � I ' ' L�4til ►Ttil��l Levei II Flexible Development Appiication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION .. _ '.'`�". ri �',"-`.��.:'-, . . .. . . change of use was allowable because a retail sales and service use is considered a lesser impact use i.e. number of required parking spaces than a restaurant use and it is a minimum development standard use. Any nonconforming structure and/or property may remain nonconforming with regard to development standards, provided that the site is brought .into compliance to the greatest extent practicable with the parking and landscaping standards as set forth in CDC Section 4-302.B. The existing front (east) setback to building and pavement; front (west) setback to pavement; side (north) setback to building; and side (south) setback to pavement do not comply with code. The parking and landscape improvements on the commercial land were approved through BCP2013-09071. The non-residential parking lot is being reviewed as a Residential Infill Project because the use is not a minimum standard use as set forth in CDC Section 4-302. The purpose of this request is to establish a non-residential parking lot with thirteen parking spaces that when added to the twenty-four existing spaces on the commercial property will exceed the required number of parking spaces for the day care. The building consists of 7,375 square feet of gross floor area which requires a minimum of five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The use requires 36 off-street parking spaces; there are only 26 off-street parking spaces on the commercial portion of the property. The non-residential parking lot will add 13 off-street parking spaces which bring the total number of parking spaces to 39 spaces which exceeds minimum development standards. However, to do so requires a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet and a reduction to the south perimeter landscape buffer from ten feet wide to 6.1 feet wide. Modifications to the site include eliminating the existing northern driveway entrance while the southern entrance will be improved and brought into compliance with code, installing code compliant parking spaces and drive aisle, and the removal of 5,916 square feet of asphalt. Special Area Plan: The property is located in the East Gateway character district in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Economic Development and Housing Department supports the overall plan that includes the day care use with required parking spaces. They believe the proposed day care project is consistent with the redevelopment and revitalization efforts for the East Gateway District. The property has been vacant for a number of years, adding a sore sight to the blighted area. City Staff expect that this project will increase the property value of the building and adjacent properties. This proposed new business is expected to support the East Gateway Vision Plan by improving the appearance of the decaying corridor, creating more foot traffic, and generating new jobs while supporting local stakeholders. The department is also working with the future tenant as part of the East Gateway Fa�ade and Building Lot Improvement Program. Development Parameters Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR� • Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-301.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.75 for properties with a FLUP designation of RM. The proposed ISR is 0.53, which is consistent with Code provisions. Community Development Board — February 18, 2014 FLD2013-09033 — Page 3 of 11 = viVRl 17�14i Level II Flexible Develo ment PLANNING&DEVEI,OPMENT p Application Review navECOrMErrr xE�w nivcsiox .. -..... .. �� Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-304, there is no minimum required lot area or lot width for a Residential Infill Project. Pursuant to the same table, there is no minimum required lot area or lot width for non-residential parking lots. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Section 3-903.F., CDC, the setback for off-street parking areas is 15 feet from the front property line, and ten feet from the side property line. The development proposal includes a request to reduce the required front (west) setback to 10 feet. In order to provide the required number of off-street parking spaces to bring the day care into compliance with minimum development standards for retail sales and service uses, a certain amount of flexibility from this provision is essential. Staff accepts that the front (west) setback reduction and the reduction to the width of the south perimeter landscape buffer are necessary to accomplish this goal, and that the resulting off-street parking will provide the opportunity for the business to be successful. Located in the East Gateway District of Downtown, the District continues to struggle with a negative image of crime due to the location of problematic uses such as day labor facilities, old motels and social service agencies that provide services to the homeless population. The commercial sector, where the subject property is located, is burdened with a declining business base, an array of deteriorating infrastructure, a mismatch of uses, and an increasing number of vacant storefronts. The additional parking spaces needed to support the day care will a11ow the business to contribute to the City's economic base through the creation of jobs, bring a blighted property back into commerce, and that this flexibility will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. Maximum Building Hei�ht: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-304, the height of a Residential Infill Project may range between 30 — 50 feet. No vertical structure is proposed as a part of this plan. For comparative purposes, according to the same Table, height is not applicable to a non-residential parking area. Minimum O�'f-Street ParkinQ• Pursuant to CDC Table 2-304, a Residential Infill Project requires two parking spaces per unit. No residential unit is proposed as a part of this project. For comparative purposes, according to the same Table, the required number of parking spaces is not applicable to a non-residential parking area. Revisions to the site plan resulted in the loss of a number of parking spaces. The location of the dumpster enclosure contributed to the loss of two parking spaces while the decision by the applicant to retain the Live Oak tree within the southern portion of the front perimeter landscape buffer lost another space. T'hat tree (rated 4.0) most likely would not have survived construction on-site. Nevertheless, a total of 39 parking spaces will be available for the day care between the twenty-four spaces on the commercial zoned property and the thirteen parking spaces within the non-residential parking lot. The combined number of spaces exceeds the minimum development standard for a day care. There is no parking space standard for a non-residential parking lot. Community Development Board — February 18, 2014 FLD2013-09033 — Page 4 of 11 ' C+LCal r�Rl��Level II Flexible Develo ment PL^�v�vING&nEV��.oPMENT p Application Review nEV�,orMErrr �vu,w nrvisiox ��-�� . ,.,_ � � Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, a11 outside mechanical equipment must be screened on all four sides so not to be visible from public streets andlor abutting properties. The site plan shows no outdoor mechanical equipment located on the portion of the property zoned MDR District. Sight Visibilitv Trian�l� Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the proposed driveways on Gulf to Bay Boulevard and South Lake Drive, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20- foot sight visibility triangles. This proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Any groundcovers planted within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, a11 utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. The applicant has provided documentation from Duke Energy that undergrounding the existing overhead utility lines within the public right-of-way along South Hillcrest Avenue is impractical. Landscapin� Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, required perimeter buffers are based on adjacent uses and/or street types. The required landscape buffer widths are 10 feet (west — local street), 10 feet (south — non-residential use adjacent to attached dwellings and like uses) and 10 feet (north — non- residential use adjacent to attached dwellings and like uses). The only perimeter landscape buffer that will be deficient in width is the south buffer that will be 6.1 feet wide where 10 feet wide is required. The applicant has mitigated the dimensional deficiency with regard to the buffer width by providing various tree type and species in excess of the minimum otherwise required by the CDC. The landscape plan includes a variety of shade, accent and palm trees (live oaks, sabal palms, crape myrtles, and silver buttonwood), as well as shrubs and ground covers (florida pivet, Indian hawthorn, beach sunflower, perennial peanut, and hamelia patens). The buffers will be planted in such a manner as to create a tiered effect providing adequate buffers between the subject property and adjacent rights-of-way and properties. In addition, the landscape plans shows that open space will be added on the north side of the property by removing 5,916 square feet of asphalt whereby significantly decreasing the impervious surface area ratio from 0.84 to 0.53. Redevelopment of the parking lot will create two interior landscape islands. Each interior landscape island will have more square footage than the required 150 square feet in area. One island will be 186 square feet in area while the other will be 244 square feet in area. Both landscape islands will consist of one shade tree, shrubs, and groundcover. Since the square footage provided for each island allows for code compliant landscaping, staff supports the Community Development Board — February 18, 2014 FLD2013-09033 — Page 5 of 11 ' C+�µ�� Level II Flexible Develo ment FLANNING & DEVELOPMENT s p Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ��;, reduction of the eight foot wide curb to curb dimension to be reduced to three feet wide curb to curb for island "A" as shown on the site plan. As previously mentioned, the property is located in the East Gateway District of Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Plan requires parking lots to be screened by a landscape buffer, solid wall or fence three feet in height along right-of-ways. A three foot solid wall or fence or landscaping three feet in height is not practical because of the sight visibility triangles located on either side of the driveway. For this reason, groundcovers (perennial peanut and beach sunflower) will be planted in a tiered effect within the sight visibility triangles. The remaining sixty-five feet running north of the driveway along the west side perimeter landscape buffer will be planted with a six foot high hedge. The intent of the applicant is to screen the parking lot as much as practical to be consistent with the downtown plan. The site is proposing the maximum practical landscaping improvements and is focusing landscaping improvements in those areas that are most visible; the front (west) and side (south) buffers. The proposed landscaping will be a significant improvement, is the m�imum practicable, and is supportable. Solid Waste: The location of the dumpster on the northeast side of the building has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department Si�nage: No formal signage package has not been presented at this time. Any forthcoming signage package must meet Code requirements. Community Development Code: The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code as follows: Section 1-103.B.1. Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through innovative and creative redevelopment. The overall property has sat dormant for eight years. The last principal use being a restaurant. At this time, the only use that could operate on the subject property would be a restaurant use; however, by providing the minimum number of parking spaces for retail sales and service use increases the number of potential commercial uses on the property through compliance with the code which enhances the value of the property. Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties. The proposed improvements to the land area zoned MDR District such as establishing a use, the elimination of 5,916 square feet of asphalt, new landscape materials, removal of one driveway on South Hillcrest Drive while bringing the property back into commerce will not devalue surrounding properties. Community Development Board — February 18, 2014 FLD2013-09033 — Page 6 of 11 '�+L(�1 ►'►Ai�er Level II Flexibie Devefopment Application Review . ;�"�+.��-.,�-'� �� . � � PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Section 1-103.B.3. Strengthening the city's economy and increasing its tax base as a whole. The property is vacant. The proposal will establish an allowable use for the site, while bringing a new service to the area and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards of the Residential Medium (RM) future land use plan category and the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District as per CDC Section 2-301.1 and Table 2-304: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Impervious Surface Ratio 0.75 0.53 X Minimum Lot Area N/A 11,629 square feet X Minimum Lot Width N/A 128 feet �{ Minimum Setbacks Front: 10-25 feet West: 10 feet (pavement) X Side: 0-5 feet North: 72 feet (to pavement) X South: 6.1 feet (to pavement) X Maximum Height 30-50 feet N/p X inimum N/A 13 parking spaces (total of 39 X Off-Street Parking (day care use on commercially parking spaces when combined zoned property requires 36 with 26 parking spaces on the C arkin s aces zoned ortion of the ro e COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2- 302.G. (Residential Infill Project): Consistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity or other development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair mazket value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Community Development Board — February 18, 2014 FLD2013-09033 — Page 7 of 11 X X X X X X Inconsistent ' L�L�1 17Lilt.r Level II Flexible Development Application Review .. . . , _� . . . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfacto and hours of operation impacts on adiacent nrooerties. Consistent Inconsistent X X X X X X COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM STANDARDS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Comprehensive Landscape Program as per CDC Section 3-1202.G: 1. Architectural theme. a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned ofi when the business is closed. 3. Communiry character. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in _ which the parcel proposed for development is located. Consistent Inconsistent X X X X NA NA SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of November 7, 2013 and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient, based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Community Development Board — February 18, 2014 FLD2013-09033 — Page 8 of 11 ' CiV(�i nRi41 Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT . �:x€m;'�'�.�.3.,:,. , . � � , . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Findings of Fact The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That subject 0.70 acre property is located on the east side of South Hillcrest Avenue at the intersection of South Hillcrest Avenue and Pierce Street; 2. That the subject property has two separate zoning classifications with the eastern portion of the property located within the Commercial (C) District and the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category and the western portion of the property located within the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and the Residential Medium (RM) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the request only consists of a non-residential parking lot within the land area zoned MDR District; 4. That a day care use (retail sales and services) has been approved to operate within the building located on the land area zoned C District; 5. That the previous use of the building was a restaurant which requires 12 off-street parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area; 6. That the building to be used as a day care (retail sales and service use) consists of 7,375 square feet of gross floor area which requires a minimum'of five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area; 7. That the retail sales and service use was approved through CDC section 4-302.B. which permits the change of use because the retail sales and services use has a lesser impact than a restaurant use on the property and the change is allowable even if the structures and/or property involved are nonconforming with regard to development standards, provided that the site is brought into compliance to the greatest extent practicable with the parking and landscaping standards set out in Article 3; 8. The parking and landscape improvements on the commercial land were approved through BCP2013-09071; 9. That the retail sales and service use requires 36 off-street parking spaces; 10. That there are 26 off-street parking spaces on the commercial portion of the property; 11. That the non-residential parking lot will have 13 off-street parking spaces which brings the total number of off-street parking spaces available for the day care use to 39 off-street parking spaces; 12. That the non-residential parking lot will be setback 10 feet from the front property line along So�th Hillcrest Avenue; 13. That the existing northern driveway entrance will be eliminated while the southern entrance will be improved and brought into compliance with code; 14. That in order to provide the maximum number of off-street parking spaces, the proposal includes a reduction to required south perimeter landscape buffer; 15. That one interior landscape island will be three feet wide curb to curb; 16. That the applicant has mitigated the dimensional deficiency with regard to the buffer width by providing various tree-types and species in excess of the minimum otherwise required by the CDC; 17. That the request includes the removal of 5,916 square feet of asphalt; 18. That the existing ISR is 0.83 and the proposed ISR will be 0.53; and 19. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board — February 18, 2014 FLD2013-09033 — Page 9 of 11 ' Clbui rt�L41 Level II Flexible Develo ment PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT p Application Review DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDMSION ��n., :• Conclusions of Law The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-301.1. and 2- 304 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 304.G of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria for a Comprehensive Landscape Program as per CDC Section 3-1202.G; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the applicable Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensiye Plan; 5. That the proposal is consistent with the vision for the East Gateway character district as set forth in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan; and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of this Flexible Development approval to allow a non-residential off-street parking lot in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with a front (west) setback of 10 feet (to pavement) and 13 non-residential off-street parking spaces as a Residential Infill Project pursuant to Section 2-204.E. as well as a reduction to the width of the south perimeter landscape buffer from ten feet to 6.1 feet; a reduction to the width dimension of one interior landscape island from eight feet curb to curb to 3.1 feet curb to curb as a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3-1402.G., subject to the following conditions: Conditions of An roval: 1. That a building permit be obtained for the parking lot and landscaping improvements; 2. That an application for a building permit be submitted no later than February 18, 2015, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to the CDC; 3. That the applicant shall be granted approval for any fencing on the subject property through a separate building permit; 4. That the dumpster enclosure shall be made of a masonry wall or similar material, architectural details and colors that match the principal building; 5. That any future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff; 6. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion, all proposed landscaping shall be installed; 7. That issuance of a development permit by the City of Clearwater does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the City for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law; 8. That all other applicable local, state andlor federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development; and Community Development Board — February 18, 2014 FLD2013-09033 — Page 10 of 11 ' L�LCU 1'1f�lel Level II Fiexible Deve�opment Application Review . .. . � .z ,.<: �;: ' . . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION 9. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe andlor fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff ATTACHMENTS: Photographs of Site and Vicinity Kevin . urnberger, Planner III Community Development Board — February 18, 2014 FLD2013-09033 — Page 11 of 11 »�' � >�v°�'"i'"w"-. —�,-"'�" �.Ma� '°�L�ls�.�.a � . �� `� ��A, � I '`r; . .�.��' ra s �fi �,.... .: - i,�e c:%.y . <��u� �t12 5pl�th�scc( frO1Y] �t1kl�Crt j�Cnpet-t��. u�s?,^�'��- .-�ssL E-•z..,,.,�_ S.S . , , - _.' _' _� s^ � ,� T:,� ��•� �� - � �.,.�; .� � , t. _� � � ...�.� ¢�+�'� �, , �. 3s��. -�' ?� MI�' � � aF' .. _ �i�.��;;��i; �_i)�7k:tt1L .y:� .. . � , _ . -. . ._ � ._'_ ..... . __s.... ..:_.. _._ . „_' �' �i,s x �� - " - ' . ... .� . .. �.. :: . . ......_ � . � . r•°... . . - - -e - .:`;� ' , . a -w"'�� - _ _ , " - � . y. , ;. � , �i .x . ..j� � -�. : { �',,�... ..� `- Y. :. , , . • _� . . y. : 1411 Gulf to Bay Boulevard FLD2013-09033 Kevin W. Nurnberger I0t1 S lt'Iyrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 72�-562-4567ext2502 kevin.nurnber er�a,mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Planner III March 2011 to present Planger Ii October 2010 to March 2011 City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. Pianner County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009 Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents, neighborhood organizations, contractors, and developers regarding future projects which included state and local government agencies. Site Assistant Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007 Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district counciIs on procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage. Development Ptanner Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006 Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations, the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Virginia Department of Transportation plan, and Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties. City Planner City Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to Z005 Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with the zoning and suhdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the City Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustments. EDUCATION University of New Orleans, LA MA Urban and Regional Planning (2004) State University of New York at Buffalo, NY BA Anthropoiogy (1999) �' � Cj N'!1i <<tL �. Ui "�' K 1 i1 s., �. �.^-1 G�6 G.v` w� d' . titi-� n ' . � � �lV ��= �� . _ 1411 GULF TO BAY BLVD o FLD2013-09033 ?�j e � planning & Deveiopment Department U�Giibert Jannelli le Development An tion Zoning: Commercial Atlas #: 2ggq Ypj�� cgs, Mixed-Uses orNon-Residentiat Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON TNE APPUCpPiT TO SU8Mt1' COMPLEI'E qND CORRECT INFORMATtpry, qryY M��qp�NG, DECEPT1yE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORIy�p710N MAY lNVqUDATE YOUR APPLI�p'nON. AU. APPUCATIONS ARE TO 8E FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, ANO 70 THE PLANNlNG & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULEDw � �P ��NO FA)( OR DELNERIES} A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE StTS pF PLANS AND APp1�CpTiON MATERIALS (1 ORlGINAL ANp 10 GOPIES} ps �qU1RED iNiTHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FpR REVIEyy BY THE DE1/E�OpMp117 R�Eyy CpMMITJ'EE, SUSSEQtJq1� SUBMtTTAL FpR 'ryE COMMUNI7Y DEVELppMENT gpqRp yy�LL REQV�(� � COMPLETE gET� OF AND 14 COPIE'S� PLANS AlVD APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED T+0 BE COLLATED�S AND APPLlCATION MATERIAlS (1 ORIGINAL . APLED AND FOLDED iNTO SETS. THE APPUCAN�, BY FIUNG 'fHIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO OOMPL1f WITH ALL APPLICABIE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OOMMUNITY DEVELpPMENT OODE. FIRE DEPT PREUMARy s1TE pLA(y (��yy �E � aPPUCnnoN �: S�,2o� PROPERiY 01NNER (PER DEED): � � `.�'; ,�-� M�uUntG anDRESS: _ y� O q C�T %,�� A�, PHONE NUMBER: _ % i'7 - �.�t �.� Z..O ? EMAIl: _ T�A N iV . : �1 �l►� _ _ _ � A6EM' OR REPRESENTATNE �� d5 �! � �►,V' � MAlL1NG ADDRESS: 1 Z, �� F',� �� PHONE NUMBER: f e�7 .. 2 b v,.. Z3 � Q� EMAII: r � (��ark� . �,�k � AODRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY; � L� `� �'j Vi< F.l.a �� PARCEL NUMBER(S): �• Z9 • i S�/ p�} (p • 0 0� �c�� °ESC�t��torv. p�—�C...� tr '}'e Sur�M� _ .� � PROPOSED USE(S): C� ((�n � N G�� A DESCRIPTtON OF REQUEST: � L�. fj W�'xl �iTl Ai% +7,a '� �, f� SPPdfically ide�jy the request (indude aN requested aode})exiblllty;. � �-�fVf�,F _(S_ � U �� e�9•. red�cti'vn 1r► requlred number of �-� ��- f L u, � t� n�Y � parking spates, heigh� setbccks, )ot �� , N � 1 M R e- o size, !ot width, specif% use, etc.J; --�--��.�� uz.,r,-,.,--•- -- E_.�vl S �� J � � � s `� �L7-y��-�q�7 _ $�,,a��tiL 2� �L � i�t�� 1- G� - : „ G'�v i To ��t4t 1� � r� U =�s� �-r.►-fF �.ut t, Di �J -, 7 t- '-�. � IS q F� 2M � TiE1l t 5 �'�2 � � � �(�! � uIl l,-L, '1 1 r. �' _ _ I1 �. Pfa� ng 3, Deveiopment Departrnerit,100 S. MYrt1e Avenue. C�� FL 33756. Tel: 7Z7-66T�1567; FauC 72T-662-4865 Pa 1 ot 8 fiev�ed 0'I/'12 J ° Clear�vater U Planning & Development Department Flexihle Standard Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORM/1TION IS fiLLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO GOMPLETE THtS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPIICATION BEIN6 Ft3UND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: c�MViz EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): V aG()L,Yl� PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): Ci �•( 1G� �,J�,u �,� SITE AREA: �q , 1D�07. � sq. ft. ----Tz GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of aIl buildings): Existing: %��95 sq. ft. Proposed: �%i3��? sq. ft_ ivlaximumAi{owabie: ° i�� ;� � S9-N- � �p�ji acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses�. - �- First use: Second use: Thlr� USE':, sq_ ft. sq. ft. • — ta ft FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by �he total square footage of entire site): �, Existing: . � • , . . . . . . , � . Proposed: . � Maximum Allowable: • fl � � • � • ' BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1" floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: _ Z - 59• ft. �� ' ��i .q ` 9�0 ofsite) Proposed: �(p'1.C) sq. ft. ( ��j .(p 96 of site) Maximum Permitted: (t � a(p1 sq. ft. ( L� 0 9'0 of site) T GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green �space within the parking lot and interior of si'te; not perimeter buffer): Existing: � 2, 59• ft• l �• � % of site) Proposed: ��d�_ sq. ft. ( �p .� % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: _�0 7'� sq. ft. ( `oq •� % of site) Proposed: ��j��t sq. ft. ( �, % of site) Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 09/12 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RA710 (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: ' ��_ Proposed: • S � Maximum Permitted_ •'�j� DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre}: BUILDING HEIGHT: 2 S� �� Existing: Existing: • � Proposed: _ Proposed: Z� • (p M Maximum Permitted: Maximum Permitted: � ^rj � � OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: _ Note: A parking demand study must be provided In conjunction with any request Proposed: to reduce the amount of required off-street parking spaces. Please see the odopted Parking Demand Study 6uidelines for further informotion. Minimum Required: 3 7 �3s�deo WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $�� ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: South: East: W est: __ STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS � I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all S rn to and subscribed before me this day of representations made in this application are true and J�_ to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize ,f�� / City representatives to visit and photograph the �-/i��(A1"I � i� \l.�/V�c�..>J , who i personallv known has properly described in this application. produce�l, __ as identification. (� �� i✓' // �� '��'�� Signature of prope owner or representative Notary public, My commission expires: � os�Rr ruut.� VIGfORIAA.KUEIiNE ��..., MY CONWItSSION t FF 033587 * # EXPIRES: Jaly 4� 2�17 sf .�� 9ordedllruBud9dN0��ft� �jF�� Planning & Development Department, �00 S. Myrtle Ave�ue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-45e Page 3 of 8 DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, 3 and 4, and the Northerly % of vacated alley formerl�r known as Park Piace, said vacated portion being adjacent and contiguous with said lots 2, 3, and 4; also lot 23, and that part of lots 24 and 25, and the Southerly % of said vacated alley being adjacent and contiguous with said lot 23, said part of lots 24 and 25, described as follows: Begin at the Southwest corner of said lot 23, and run thencE North along the westerly line of said lot 23, and part of lot 24, 128.88 feet to an intersection with the southerly extension of the westerly line of said Lot 2; thence northerly along said Southerly extension, 22.67 feet �o a point on the center-line of said vacated alley; thence Southeasterly along said center-line, 191.80 feet to an intersection with an Easterly extension of the Southerly line of said lot 23; thence Westerly along said Easterly extension 141.94 feet to the P�INT OF BEGINNING; all being in Block "C" of BOULEVARD HEIGHTS, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 54, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. ORC I CDB 2013-2014 SUBMITTAL CAIENDAR Level 1, 2 and 3(FLS, FLD, DVA SmallfLarge Scale LUP', REZ and Text Amendments) THIS CALENDAR IS SUSJECT TO CHANGE To submit a Le�+ei One (Flexibfe Standard Oevetopment) or level Two (Flexible Developmenl) applkretion, pieaae eontacl Robett Tafft, Devebpment Review Maneger (727-582-4b39). THE pEADLINES ARE VERY 1MPORTANTI Levat One Applfcatlons are rev(ewad by the staN-level Dovelopment Review Committeo jDRCi. Level 71vo Appllcatbns wfli be reviewed by tha DRC and lhen et a publlc hearing held betore thc Community Devetopment Board (C09). Level Three eppqcatlona (land use plan amendments end rozoninga) wiil be rovlewed by Ihe DRC, C�B and Me Ciry Councfl (eontact Long Renge Planninp at (727-982-4557 or 727- 882-454�. �t aaclicat ons muat bo submitted bv 12•OQ NOON on lh0 dendllne data as shown below All epplicatbna n1u81 De Complete0 In thelr en►Iroty, algned and notadze0. Fourteea coplea of the appllcat(on and the odginal along with 1S copias of the stte plana are requlretl for Iha lnilial submittel, addUfonat copiea will be requeete i prior to review by the COB. Ploaso w0ate, atapte and fold ali appllcationa and plena. Appticetlons will be roviewed and suliiciency detertnined et lbe DRC meeUng Qnformalion is sufflciclent to make e determiaatlon about the requast�. If nufticlent by the deadline below, Leve1 Two cesee wNl be echeduled tor revlew by the CDB ANendance of the appNcanUrepreaentadve ie requlred at the DRC and CDB meettngs. Cyclo 1 Cycla 2 Cyclo 9 Cyelo 4 CyCle 6 Gj�Cle 8 CyCle 7 Cyclo 6 Cycltt 9 Cyefe 10 Oyele 91 Cyole 12 � �donth J Jan•13 � Fcf�-'13^ W1ar�19 ,+pr-'13 May-13 Jun•1� Jul•13 Au�-13 Sop-13 Oct-13 Nov-iJ Dae-13 APPLICATION OUF NOON �~ � DEADLINE I/3/2013 2Hf2013 9l1/Y013 4/1f1013 811/2013 0f312D13 7Hl2013 8H/2013 9/3f2013 10H12013 11/1/2013 1Z/212013 lJ Doadlino For Complotonoss QpEr'ORC n100N •��0/2013 ?.liT/2013 3H212013 411012013 6110/2013 8/7�/2073 7/1'112019 8I121401a 9H212013 10J101Z019 '1'1l1412a13 1aJ11/2D73 DftC plIEFTIIJG Sufllciency Detennin�ciun z1712oiJ 3/7/2013 4/RI2U'IJ 5/2/2013 6!Gl2018 7l3/201� 8H/2013 9l612Q73 10/3/20�3 11/7f2013 9216l2013 1l4/2014 RESUBMIi'7�L INFO DUE (p NOONDElt[JIIPlE 2115/2Q13 3/15/20�19 �1/12/2013 5l�0/2013 G114l20'12 %l1:/20I:t i1/912013 9/93120�3 10711/2013 11I1512013 'i?J73/201� 1H0f20�4 p-- — — ----.".._......_------ -•�------_ . --_ ______.----- U CDBfdEETING 1I9�JIqU1J 4l16/2013 5121I2013 ii/1U/2015_ 7116l2013 iS120I2013^ 9117l2013 10h15t2U13 11l79f2011 9711T1201� '1/2112014 2/18120'14 Appnal Pcriod Expltes A/3f20'13 5/1l2013 6/5l2013 7/3I20�IJ T 7I30/2013 9/312013 10M/2093 10/29l20'17 12f312013 'I2l3112093 2!Al2014 3l4f2014 Deadllno WZ forthaPPC AI1012013 6/01201� 0112f2019 7/10l2013 8f1Al2013 9/11/2013 10/fl/2013 11h3/2013 12/71/2013 T8D TBD TBD CC•1 d11812013 6118/2013 Gf19l2013 7N8J4013 8114J2D13 911912013 10l1612073 1112112013 17J1912013 TBD TBD TBD CC2 (Lorgo Scalo lUP Is TBD� 5/1/201� 81612013 7l13112013 811f2013 91512073 10f3l2013 '111Tf2013 1Z/612013 TBD THp TBD TBD PPC Hoaring �LIIPj 1:OOPM) 5III/2019 6112/2013 U/1412013 8l1412013 9111l2013 10/912013 7711312013 '12111/2013 TBD TBD TDD T9D CPA Hea• • (LUP) (9:30AM '�h1) W4J2011 719/2013 9/612013 915l20138PM 7018/20'13 17/6/Z0'IS 12f70/20136P0.5 1f7l2014 TBD T8D TSD �� 0 } � . Planning & Development Depar6ment � �a�r�vater . . � Flexibie Developme�t Apphcat�on °�� Site Plan Submittal Packa e Check Iist g iN noomoN �ro r�� coM�u aoa� c�€va,v�aa�r �A.o� �wPUCNnon, au r�.0 a�ucAnoMS sHau. inrauuE a srrE PtAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCWDES TKE FOWOWINa lNFORMATION AND/OR PIANS: 6� Respora�,s to tlte flexib�ity aidefia % the spedflc �e(s) be� requesbed as set io�th in the zonic�g Dhpict(s) in whtch the subject Propetty is IocaLed. The attached Rexibte Devetopment APP� �bNity Critietia sheet shall be used t�o provide the9e respor�ses. ❑ ResPonses to d�e General Applkabtlity cnteria set fortfi in Section 3-g14.A. The attached pexibie Development Applicaiion Generai AppBcabil'ity Criteria sheet shall be used m provide tfiese responses. ❑ A s�ned and sealed sucvey of the ProP�Y Prepaned bY a�red Mand surv�.yor indud'x�g ti�e location of the proPeKY, dlm�or� aae2�g� location of aq cumerrt lorabion af all Pubiic and private easements induding otiicial �ds book and page numbers ar�d street right(s}of way within and adjaoentin the sibe. KA ❑ tf tfie appikatian wnuld rewft i� tfie removai or relocation of mobile home owners �df� in.a moWfe home park as P�ded in FS. § 723.083, the appik�tion rnust proyide that fMurmation required by Section 4202.A.S. A1 f�r ❑ ff this appiication is being sultmitted for the purpose af a boatlif� catwaik, davit, doc1� marfna, Pler, seawaU or other si m[lar marine structur� then the apptication must pro�ide detaited pians and specifications �red 6y a Flo�ida professional e�ee�'. 6earing ttte se� and si�a�Wre of the �', e�co�t slgned and s�led piat�s sha�l not be required for ttte repair cr r��t cri` �, sbnngers, ra�'a:g, �ovrer 1a�ngs� tie p�, or the privat�e and caraner�l dodcs. �� °f �QS P�r�B on �A site plan prepared by a pro#essiona! ardiitect, engtneer or landscape architect dravm to a miNmum scate of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size nat to exceed 24 ind�es by 36 ind�es that includes the fotlowi�g information: ❑ index sheet of the same size shall be induded with individual sheet numbers referenced theceon. FY Nonfi arrow, scale, location map and datie pr+epaced. 1'� �1 ❑ ldeMffication of the boundaries of pf�ases, ff developmerrt is proposed to be oo�utruc�ed in phases. iJ p1 ❑ l�oc�tion of the Coastat Construction Contro! line (CCCLj, whether the property is located within a Specfat Fbod Hazard Area, and the Base Hood Elevation (BFEj of the propenY, as applicable. �'' Locatlon, footprint and si=e of ai! e�dsting and proposed builc�ngs and structures o� the site. �Location and di�r�s of vehiaalar a�d �edestrian circ;ulatlor� systems, both on-site and off-siLe, wfth proposed Points of aoce�, a' l.�on of ali exisUng and propased sidewalks, curbs, wat¢ir Bnes, sanitary sewer Itnes, stonn drains, fire hydrants and seawalts and ar�Y P�� uttlity easemerrts. � Ar ❑ Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a naRative desaibing the proposed stormwater' co�troi plan induding cakulations. Ad�tional data necessary to demor�strate compliance with the Crty of Clearvv�ater Stvrm Orau�e Design UiLeria manual may be required at time of buildi�g oonsdvction permit. i� �ocation of solid waste coliedion fadiities, requtred screening and provisioos for accessibility for collection. ��► ❑ Locafiion of off-street loading area, if required by Settion 3-1406. �f A!I adjacent rightis3-of-waY, wid� indication of oer�LerHne and width, paved yvidq�, existlrtg median arts and intersecbions and bus shelters. 6i Dimensions of existing and propcised lot lines, streets, drives, buildirtg lines, setbacic� structurai a►erE�au�gs and building �� 6?� Building or structure etevation drawings tf�at depict the proP�d building heigi�t and building mat�eriais. P+� B�eYebpRw�k De�tmartt,100 S. Mynis Ave�tne, peatwa�, FL 33756, Tel: 727�6B2�+168T; Fa� 72%lf62-4865 Re�sed 01H2 i� Typical flaor platts, irxx:tuudi� floor pians far each floor of an5+ parbng P,araBe. � Demolition pian. ��' ❑ Iderni(icaiion a�d desai��iatt of wa�erooc�rses, Mredands, tnee rn�, �1�ten t�ees, and other envtronmerttaliy sensitive areas. O If a deviation from the pa�ng standards is requested that is greater than 509G (exduding those standards wher+e the diff�enoe between the top and bo�ttom of the range is one parklnB spaoe), then a paridng demand study will need io be provided. The findir�s of the study wiil be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Pl�se see the adopbed Parking Demand Study Guide�nes for further Ntfotmation. � A tree survey st�owing the location, DBH and spec3es of aii e�sting trees with a DBH of foin inches or more, and ideMifyinB those tree.s proposed to be rerrav�ed, if any- ❑ A tree inventory, priepared by a oertified arbora�, of aii trees four inmd�es DBH w mwe that reflects the siz� qnopy, and cotMition of such trees may be required ff deemed appiicabie by staff. Chedc witft staff. �a o � A Traffic ImpacE Sfiidy shap be required f�r ail proposed develapments if the total gene�ated net new trips meet one or more of the following oonditions ' Pro(�osa� ts e�ed m gene�ate 100 or more new trips in anl/ S� t�our (directionat trips, inbamd ar outbound on the abuctir� str�eets) and/or 1.000 or more new triPs Pe�' day: o� '�� P g�on deBrades the level of servioe as adap�ed in the Qt�s Comprehensive Plan to unac�table leve(s; or • The study atea e�ontains a segment of roacfway and/oir i��ersecaon with flve repprtable ao�der� w�hin a prior iwelve '�0��' �Od• °r ��d/� �nte�ection exists on the pt�s annua! Iist of most hazardous lowtions, Provided bY� �of � PoHae Departrr�e� or ' The TtaftiC � Mart�,¢e!' � t!� �+�..� �'2� � �� process. Examples indude developments that are expectied bo � �tuire suc� assessment in the plan review ��Y ��+'�P� a oautr�ined roadway or developmerns wfth unknowo tyip generation and/or other unknown factors. A landscape pian shall be proWded for any project w� �� a new use or a dtange of use; or an exe�og use 1s improved or rerrwdeled fi a value of 2596 or more of the valuation of the p�indpal sbruchare as refleded on the ProP�Y aPp�iser's wment r�ecord� or if an � i� � to � exKNog aPPro�ed siLe PNan: or a parking lat nequires addip'onal ��8 P� ta the pnovi�ons of Anide 3, Div�iOn 14. The �Pe P� shal! indude ifie fopowing tnformabion, if not otfierwise required "m oonfiu�dion wid� tfie applkation for de+�etopment aPprova� fa'�N Locatio�, size, descriptlon, sPedficat3ons and quantities of ali existing and proposed landscape matertals, induding botanicai and common names. � Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, bY sPecies, size and location, indu�ng drip line. I� Irrberior iandsqpe ar�s haR+ched and/or shaded and iabeled and inierior �andscape ooNera6� exp�'essed boti� in fee� exdusive of perirtieter IandscaPed sMps, and as a peroeritage of tfie paved area cov�erage af the �sarking lot and vehicular use ar�s. L� Location of e�asting and ProRosed structures and improvements, indud'mg but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fe�ces, p��. P��, dumps� Pads, Pad mounted transformers, fi�e hydrants, werhead obstrucdons, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, sMrm drains, seawalis, util'rty easemertts, treatment of ali ground surfaces, and any other features that may irtfluente the praposed landsqpe. Q� l.ocation of Rarking areas and otfier vehicular use areas, induding paridn8 spaces, circulatior� �aisles, intertor handscape ' islands and curhi�. NA ❑ Drainage a�d reter�ion areas, induding swates, side slopes and bottom elevations, u a, O peiineatlon and dimensioru of all requ'ir�ed perimeter ta�dspp�d p�� duding sight t�iar�les, if any. PP ege�5 of S� � t00 S. �nt10 AveM�, �. FL 3z73� Te� T27fi82�S6T; Fa�c 7ZT�62�1855 Rsvfead OtH2 LL ° �pn�� , Planuaifng & Developmem Department �'�� Flexible �evelopment Application _ ,,�,,�..,�,.,�..�.� � � ��d` General Applicability Criteria PROVlDE CoMP1ETE aESPONSES TO EAQ� OF THE SDC (6) C,EN6RA� APMJCE1BIUiY CKITER�► ExPUUWlr�B HOw, �N cErai, rM� CRITERION IS BEIN6 C�IIIPlJED WITH PER THIS DEVEI.OPMEM' PROP05AL L The ProPosed de�►'ebPmerlt Of Ute WRd witi be in hart»orly witfi the Sql� bu114 mv��e. demitv and charact�±r c�f ari��p�r 2. The proposed development wiit not hinder or d�cour.�e the appropriate dc+velopment and use of or significarniy impair the value thereof. �� and buildings 3. The pnoposed devetopment will not adversely affect tfie healtfi or of the proposed use. ��Y or persons rPSiding or waridng in the neighborhood 4- The Pnoposed dev�eloprt�ent is designed to minimize traffic aona�stinn_ 5. T� P� d��t is aor�ent with the oommunity d�aracber of tfie imrr�ediaLe vkinfty of the parce! ProPused for de�v�optner�t, 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effecis, induding visuai, acousec and olfactory and hours of operabion impacts, on adjacent properties. �8 a� �epe�ae� 100 S. Mrtq Ave�w�. Cle�. R 33756. T� ?Z7�567; Fwc T2T-682�65 Paga 6 of 8 E�vtsed 01/�12 } Clearv�ater U Planning & Development Department Flexible Standard Development Application ��'`��'�� Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE CbMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPL)CABLE FLEXIBlLITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC llSE(5) BEING REQUESTF.D AS SE7 FORTN IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S) tN WHICH THE SUBIECT P%OPERTY IS LOCATED. EXP[AIN NOW,1N DETAlL, EACH CR)TERION !S BEING COMPUED W1TH PER TMIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). �8 y T��ic�is rr.�� f�,¢/�i�inr'., Ge, ` �, �_ -- - 1.� . _ •,•� ,,� �l'�i�� .�_�i'�_ r .. � , , ,, � "' �� ! � � , - � !i � C�, �� '_� � i� .. .� � � . _ L � �� . .. � ;. !.�/E" 1�1Li/l6 A/a FGG� � i �. y Br��" d,�,��_ /d/c r�/ �/�F Planning 8 peveJopment Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, C{Qarwater, F� 33756, Tel; 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-�865 Page 7 of 6 Revised 01l12 S 2-304 To view most currer�t version, visit www.municode.com. CO1bIM[7\rITY T}F:VF;1.nPT�tF.NT (;(�D.F.. the use of significant partions o�� the prap- erty tvill be us�d for passive recre�tional purposes. C.. �esid.entccrl in�t� yrojects. 1. The development or redevelopznent of thc p�rcel proposed for develnpment is other- wise impractical withput deviations from one or morc of the following: intensity; other development standards; 2: :'T?fi� development of the parcel proposed for development AS a residc�ntial infill project �vill not materially reduce the fair znarket value of ubutting properties; `3: :`T'I�ie uses wi.thin the residential infill proiect are otherwise permitted in the district; �. °"�' �'he uses �vithin the r�s�dentiali:nfill project �xe campatible rvith adjacent Iand uses; �: ,`� "'�he developme.nt -of the parceI proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vici�- ity of the parcel proposed for develop- ment; &: The design of the propased residential infill project creates a forrn and f�nction which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Gleanvater as a whole; i: F7exibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking access or other develapment standards are justi- fiec�l. by the beneiits ta community charac- ter and the immediate �ricinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ((.)rd. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6595-00, § 3, 9-7-00; Ord_ No. 7413-05, § 5; 5-5-05; Ord. No. ?449-05, § 3S, I2-15-05; Ord. No. 7605-06, § 2�, 420-06) DIVISION 4. A�EDIUR4 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTLAL UISTRiCT f"MI�DR") Section 2-401. Intent and purpose. The intent �nd purpose of the Mediun� High Density Iiesidential District ("MIIDR") i5 Lu �ru- tect and preseive the integrity and value of exist- ing, stable residential neighborhoods of inediuzn high density while at the same time, allo��ina a careful and deliberate redevelapment and revital- ization of such neighbnrhrxi�ls in naed of revital- iaation or neighborhoods with unique amenities �vhich crerxte uniquo oppoztunities ta increase properiy values and the overall attractiveness of tlie CiCy. Section �-4U1.1. Maximum davelopment po- tential. The Medium High Density Residential Distriet ("MHDR") may be located in more than one land use category. It is the intent of the MHDR District that development be consistent �vith the Countycvide Future Land Use Plan as required by state law. The uses and deve�opment potential of a p�rcel of land. within the MFiDR District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Gow�tyx�ide Future Land Use Designation of the propert.y, including any acreage or floor area restrictions set fortk� in the Rules Goncerning the Adtninistra- tion of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended from time to time. Developnnent poten- ti�l for the Countywide Future i.and Use Desig- natinns that apply to the MHDR District are as follows: Countywide Future Maximum IJu�elling Maximnm Floor Land Use Units per,Acre Area RatiolLnper- Desibrr�liun u/'Land uious Surface Ratio ResidenLial ?t+Ie- 15 d«elling units FAR .�OIISR . r5 dium per ttcre Residential FLigh RO dweUing units FAR .60(ISR .85 per �iere (Orcl. Nu. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 5043-09, � 6, 9-3-09} Supp. No. 25 CD2:26 July 2012, Suppl�emenf 2� ° Clearwater Planning & Development Department _ Flexible Dev�lopment Application " Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: i �` (�%�'� �L"(` C��s. � v ��/U ti� e Z---G � 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the foilowing described property: / �ri C�c�-c, r ,'� r��j� +�1L��,1 �'-L.,�� (�. 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): �� -7�` ��'� � � ��Jr��.�1 i �f� z�..1��..� c� �� - c� v� o� � 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: � ��n.� 7'�/ �� , t�-� S' %�' ��,� ( ;��. e.T , as (his/their; agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; S. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and tne uw�ier authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7, Th�t (I/U�al, tha � �nrlartiened authoritv; hereby certify that the foreeoine is true and correct. ��._.a__�-.-�.....--. �_ Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner BEFORE h1E THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS ,. V r•v C�Y OF �_C�- V� '"1`-�C�l � , PERSONALLY APPEARED DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS ro�";::' �°��, VICTORIA A, iNEHt� /1 * �_�, * MY COMMISSION t FF 033587 / f. w �[j EXPIRES: July 4, 2017 � G '�P��•*.a� BondedThNBudgelNottrySenices f � p.�' Notary P blic ignature l= � -�,1 My Commission Expires: � ��(1 Notary Seal/Stamp WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. Planning R Development Department, 100 S. I'Ayrtie Avenue, Clearw2ter, FL 33756, Tel: 727-552-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 7 of 7 Revised 01/12 _* Randall Marks Architect 1201 Fairway Avenue South (727) 368.6928 Fax (727) 204-2328 Cell FI. Lic. No. AR 10892 RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS CITY OF CLEARWATER 1411 GULF TO BAY JANUARY 7, 2014 1. Please see attached Comprehensive Landscaping Application. 2. Two Live Oak trees are scheuled to be provided on the Commercial portion of the site. With this application we are proposing two more to be planted in the parking lot islands plus one to pe planted as part of the small grove proposed for the Southeast corner of the MDR porfion. 3. OK. See revised plan. Quantities shown are only for the MDR portion of the site. The Commrcial portion is already permitted. 4. Custer of palms added and 2.5" caliper added to legend. 5. The intent of the program is to ensure that demonstratively better landscaping is installed in cppropriate areas in exchange for leniency in others. To this end the following are shown to be provided in exchange for deviation from the 10 foot requirement for landscaping along the entire western edge: One parking space will be demolished to give the 33" Live Oak to the south of the driveways from Hillcrest room to thrive. A Live Oak and three additional palms have been added to the grove in the Southeast corner to create a hammock of native trees. The northern driveway will be abandoned. Additional green space will be created in the Vehicular Use Area, planted with ground cover and Buttonwood Trees. The dumpster enclosure will be "hidden" by lush landscaping, and additional and varied ground covers will be provided within the sight triangles at the Hillcrest driveway. 6. The areas of the two islands are shown on the plan and are 186 sq. ft. and 244 sq. ft. Dimensions are shown on the plan. Any deviation from standard is due to their irregular shapes. Both islands exceed the 150 sq. ft. minimum. 1 .� 7. Trees on the islands have been changed to Live Oaks. Shrubs have been added to cover 50%. 8. A tier of Vinca major has been added to the Hillcrest boundary. 9. Parking space dimensions have been added. All are at least 9 feet. 10. Undergrounding is not practicable. Please refer to corespndece with Duke energy. 11. Lighting note added to plan although no parking lot lighting is proposed at this time. 12. Wheel stops and note added. 13. Actual square footageof the two districts is now shown at the top of the plan. Randall Marks, Architect 2 � ° l�arwat�r �C � Planning & Develapment Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application IT !S INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TQ SUBMIT CQMPLETE AND CORRECi 1NFORMATION. ANY MISLEADtr16, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPiETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATlON MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATiONS ARE T� OP�E� DEP R7MEN�BY NOON ON TNE SCHEDU ED EADLINE pAT�E.ON (�O FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVfL A TOTAL OF il COMPLEfE SETS OF PLAAIS AP1D APPUCATION MA7ERIALS t1 ORiGiNAL AND 10 G�PIES) A5 REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FQR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CdMMiTI'EE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITiAI FOR iHE COMMUNITY DEVELOA AND 14OCOP�IES}F I.ANS AND�APPL{CATIONS ARE R QU RED TO BE COOLAT D STAPL D AND`FOLDED MATERIALS {1 ORIGIN iNTO SETS. THE APPLICAMT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPIICABLE REQUIREMEPITS OF THE tOMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN7 CC?DE. PROPER7Y OWNER (PER DEEDj: MAiLING ADDRESS: PNONE NUMBER: EMAIL: AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMSER: EMAIL: 2 , 4�a1 • � �.a .0 .. �. ' -- -- � ADDRESS OF SUBIECTPRO�ERTY: ��I{ GUiT 1u ,N �Q'l,�, C L't-��'�`'°� �` �2.1�� DESC�2IPTION OF REQUE57: Specifically +dentify the request (include al! requested code flexibifity,• e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height setbacks, Jot slze, !ot width, specif7c use, erc.): SiA7E OF �LORIDA, COUNTY �F PINELLAS �'L— !, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this � day of representat+ons made in this a{�plication are true and ��p�� ,�, to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowiedge and authorize W�o is personally known has City representatives to visit and photograph the � propercy described in this application. produced �� L« �� S�� " ��°":�II -v__. ' . / � �JACQUEUNE �AYT `= i�r �O�M�SS�Urd u EE o t79 � / ' , yP1RE5: June 24, ?. 15 �–✓• � na r,o��aFC .� u � r--� • . ,. . , — – Signat�e of ProAerty owner or representative My corrj�mission expires: Pla�ning 8� Development Department, 100 S. MyrtlA Avenue, CEearwete�, FL 33756, 7e1: 727�62-4567; FaXRevised2 1 12 Page 1 of 2 ��eo►Se See di�4cl�ed +�'�onses. o �� . Planning & Development Department � � a�� Com rehensive Landsca in A lication P P g PP � ; Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE FIVE (� FLEXIBIUTY CRITERIA EXPLAININ6 HOW, IIY DETAII, THE CRITERION IS BElNG C0111�PUED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING PROPOSAL 1. Architectiirai Theme: a. The tandscaping in a Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the prindipal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR ' b. The design, charader, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping prog�am shali be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcei proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2 Lighting. Any lighfing proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscaping program is automatically controlied so that the lighting i� turned off when the business is closed. 3. Commun�iy Charocter. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive landscape Program will enhance the communijty character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property Va/ues. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive landscaping program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Planning 8 Development Depar6ment,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearvvater, FL 33756, Tel: 7Z7-662-4567; Fax: 727-662�865 Page 2 of 2 Revised 01/12 Randall Marks Architect 1201 Fairway Avenue South (727) 368.6928 Fax (727) 204-2328 Cell FI. Lic. No. AR 10892 Comprehensive Landscaping Application Responses to the Flexibility Criteria CITY OF CLEARWATER 1411 GULF TO BAY JANUARY 7, 2014 1. Architectural Theme: b. The intent of the program is to ensure that demonstratively better landscaping is installed in appropriate areas in exchange for leniency in others. To this end the following are shown to be provided in exchange for deviation from the 10 foot requirement for landscaping along the entire western edge: One parking space will be demolished to give the 33" Live Oak to the south of the Hillcrest driveways room to thrive. A Live Oak and three additional palms have been added to the grove in the Southeast corner to create a hammock of native trees. The norfhern driveway will be abandoned. Additional green space will be created in the Vehicular Use Area, planted with ground cover and Buttonwood Trees. The dumpster enclosure will be "hidden" by lush landscaping, and additional and varied ground covers will be provided within the sight triangles at the Hillcrest driveway. 2. A note has been added to plan requiring exterior lighting to be switched off at 9 PM, although no parking lot lighting is proposed at this time. 3. Currently, the area around the site has officially been declared "blighted". The site has been vacant for over ten years. It is in a run-down, dilapidated condition. The new day care business, already approved for building permits, will help in the revitilization of the area by bringing a viable business to the area, owned, staffed and patronized by people with an intrest in the community and its social fabric. The fact that this will be a learning center for kids indicates an optimism for the future and a better community. This landscaping proposal reinforces and completes the remainder of the project. 4. At present the values of the properties in the immedite vivicinity are negatively impacted by this disteressed property. By improving the look of the properfy and having a viable business there, properfy values should rise in the immediate neighborhood. Having a day care center in the neihborhood will make it a better place for people with young children to work, making it attractive to young families who will then patronize other businesses in the area. They will also be more inclined to want to live nearby, increasing the demand for housing, raising rents. 5. Gulf to Bay Boulevard is a"primary corridor', and the commecial portion of this site along it, is designed and permitted by the City with that in mind. This MDR portion of the site is designed to complement the rest of the project. Randall Marks, Architect E Tree inventorv 1. Laurel Oak 20" DBH Rating 2.0 Recommend removal, the tree has poor structure and extensive pockets of decay. Die back in the canopy exists as well Tree is Hazardous to not oniy vehicles but people using the parking lot. 2. Laurel Oak 30" DBH Rating 2.0 Tree is located off site. Tree has poor structure but due to it being located off site removal is not an option without coordination from the neighboring property owner. When the removal of onsite asphalt is done to make room for green space asphalt must be removed by hand. Tree barricades must be installed at 2/3 the drip line once the asphalt is removed. Tree barricade placement is shown on the plans in red. 3. Laurel Oak 6" DBH Rating 2.0 Tree is onsite with poor structure and in an area that will not allow for proper growth and recommend removal due to potentially hazardous condition. 4. Live Oak 34" DBH Rating 4.0 Recommend preservation, remove the asphalt parking stall adjacent to the tree by hand. After the stall is removed install tree barricades as shown on the plan. Request the requirement for shrubs and ground cover to not be required inside the drip line of this tree. Mulch or other organic material would be the best option and would remove the need for irrigation trenches to be dug inside the drip line if shrubs and ground cover is not planted. Elevate tree to 16 feet at the drive asile and for sight visibility triangle. 5. Washingtonia Palm 24' CT Rating 3.0 Palm shown being removed or not existent on the provided plan, with a replacement value of one diameter inch. 6. Washingtonia Palm 32' CT Rating 3.0 Palm shown being removed or not existent on the provided plan, with a replacement value of one diameter inch. 7. Washingtonia Palm 38' CT Rating 3.0 Palm shown being removed or not existent on the provided plan, with a replacement value of one diameter inch. 8. Washingtonia Palm 21' CT Rating 3.0 Palm shown being removed or not existent on the provided plan, with a reptacement value of one diameter inch. 9. Washingtonia Palm 2Q' CT Rating 3.0 Palm shown being removed or not existent on the provided ptan, with a replacement value of one diameter inch. 10. Live Oak 4.5" DBH Rating 4.0 0 Tree has good structure, and should be preserved. Instail barricades at the drip {ine of this tree. Tree barricades are shown on the plan. 11. Red Cedar 28" DBH Rating 2A Tree has many pockets of decay throughout the trunk and top. Tree is ciose to the building and neighboring structures. Recommend remaval due to potentialty hazardous condition. 12. Red Cedar 16" DBH Rating 3.0 Tree is in good condition with minimal decay. The neighboring fence has been nailed to it and should be properly installed without nailing into this tree. Recommend preservation. This tree should not be affected by the construction due to it's location. 13. Carrot Wood 13" DBH Rating 2.0 Tree is located off site. Unless the asphalt is being re-milled there is no required tree preservation. 14. Carrot Wood 10" DBH Rating 2.0 Tree is located off site. Unless the asphalt is being re-milled there is no required tree preservation. EV�ALITAT�41� G�:�D� Q Dead — ite.quire ItemovaI 1 Poor (nearly dead a�dlor hazardo�as) — Require Removal 2 Be�ow Average (declining, diseased, poor strueture, potential hazard} — Require R.emoval 3 Average (w�rthy of preservation, but some minvr problems, minor d�cline, minor tip die back, minor inclusion) - Problems can be caneeted. 4 Above Average (heafthy tree with only minor gmblems) 5 Outstanding f �ery healthy} 6 Sp�cimen (unique in size, age, exceptional qualifiy} The above �rading s}�stem is utilized by the City of Clearwater to evaluate existing tre�s and to indicate whether the tree is worthy vf Preservation andfor r�mova] because they pose a hazard � � i+1 � � �I�4RDU1OOD3 �'� ;;�:�_.. ,::� ;;v� �-• .. . ► / c��. ;o.: S,P� .IR 0�= bOW U BARRIER 1, MIh11MUM RADIW5 Tb 9E i'ROTECTED: A. HAROWQOD3 -,2/3 RRiPU�IE B. COIVIFERS d� SA@AL PAI,MS - EN1'IRE DRIPLINI 2. UPRIGH'fS � N0 tES5 THAN 2" X 2" LUMBEf�, 3. HORIZONTALS - NO LESS THAN t" X 4" LUMBER 4, 9ARRIERS BHAIt. 9E ERECTEO AROUNQ TRE�S BEf'ORE CONSTRUCTICIN. 5. Uf?RION'f PO$TS ARE 70 @E AT LEAST 4 F�ET iN LENG7H WITH A�IINIMUM OF i FOd7 ANCHORED IN GROUNO AI+1D 3 FEET ABQVE GROUNO. 6. B1IRRIERS TO REMAIN IN PIACE IR�iTII A��. PAVING COMSTRU�TION ANp HEAYY EQl11PMENT 15 bUT OF AI fURTHER. �NFORMATIpN MAY BE 08TAlNED FROkI TNE IAND RESOURCE SPEC�AUST AT 562-4741. UPRIGH7 'Tf�E SA�RIeIGAt�� N.T.g. r�t��5 •. s. . ■ R C1TY OF CI�ARViIATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORK5 ADMlN1S7RAT''IqN EN�1h1�ERIIVG � �:. �:: �' � �' � �HAPTER 4: SFST MAN�kG�IYIENT PRA�TICES FOR ERt1StON AN� SED1MfNFATIf)N CONTRQL �� 5�'ii�f FILT�R FA.BRI� �� yy�TtiC741T WtRE N�SH F�d1Pt'O'R'F` STEfL OR - yVpOT� ppST .�----�—'= _-----�—"_ �� { t2' Mlt� � �„-'-� FLpW ♦''� �"�' �i�"-""'r—'�" � � _� � � 'u� �r r�wc sP�►c�r�s raTt+ ru� su�'a+er � 6 FT tMX SP,�GIllfi WIT4�101tr YORE Si�O�i f�GE �tLT'ER P,�9Rl� !4'fTAiGH 5�-'� �/ 70 UP57'R�AM 51�€ DF P05T_ '�— a� e� +4•xb' TI�FIC.H YVt�G�AG� S�FANDA�RD DETAtL TrZEhiGH YYtTii NATIVE $,4GfC�ILL Figure 4.4a. Silt fence Source: Erosion Draw �%�: `i��i � ��%o� _4 /.� 6R,4V�L ALTERNATE DETAIl, � TRENGid Wli'�1 GRAViL NCJ'� - 1. tt�tSP'EG'�' A#Jt? �AiR �� 'TER �*G�► 5!'1`�RM �/�NT ANT� R� 10VE 5£1�IN�N'i Y�EN . t�GE551�R'f. 2. � S�DIM�IVT 5FlHl-L H� D�P{�5t'fED TO At� �R�A TH14�' lNl!_L. NOT GON'(�i�'1� �� QFf�51T� AND GAN i3� P�RMAI�NTL'f ' 5T�4B1�}�D- 3. StLT �1+iG� 5�F1Ai-L H� PL�� '� : �priTt'�IJR� TD MAX1Ml� PdPiD'INb E-Pf''IGt�trGl'. 47