The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2013-110420 � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD � � �� DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT _ ., :,.,,_,__,�,�,�,.�.,�,,,. PLANNING AND � �= �r��=��``-%�-��-"'° STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: CASE: REQUEST: GENERAL DATA: Agent........................... Applicant/ Owner . . .. . ........ L oca tion . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . Property Size .................... Future Land Use Plan...... Zonin9' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... Special Area Plan .............. Adjacent Zoning.... North: South: East: WeSt: Existing Land Use ............. Proposed Land Use......... January 21, 2014 F.6 FLD2013-11042 Flexible Development application to allow a 3,900 square foot multi-use commercial dock with 22 slips as an accessory use to the existing upland attached dwellings in the High Density Residential (HDR) District with a lot area of 78,719 square feet (1.80 acres), pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-601.C3. ___�:_ e_ . f�._.... __� ...... . .... . R-' , �Y �� , ,� ^ . Terri Skapik � �,, �- �� _, Island Way Towers, LLC � 223 Island Way; east side of Island Way, approximately 550 feet north of the � intersection of Island Way and Windward ? Passage . , ,�. .. �r �, _ a ! �. *' "�!�'� �, . � �� ' : ��` + ` � . 1.803 acres ,� �R'' � � `' � . . _, f' ! ^ Residential High (RH) � � �'' � `�' � High Density Residential (HDR) District ,�:�^ fr r� �" ,,... , v� � ,�P „,,� Island Estates Neighborhood Plan �j �, Medium High Density Residential -• '� �, (MHDR) District , . - .!fi� High Density Residential (HDR) District "�°"` -� �� Preservation (P) District - '�� ,i''�_ . ��s°� Commercial (C) District �: . . � � i• � _ Attached Dwellings, 53 unit Condo ��; _'. � Attached Dwellings, 53 unit Condo . � ° :. � `` � ,cf :"'�.-�.� ,; ;r po.= 's� i � 'A, ��" `�� : � k �� . . . ;� f� �� , �� .. . t. f, `6�� -I .`s '�' r, , ; � -, �� ` `:�I ��g ; �� .. y �� : ,_ ; � �'`' �•Y..��'�.� � �� '"� ��v ��+'��}��a, `�, `�2rt �1 �t� ��,� ; � � = ; l ��'__' _ ' r� � `t�� +� ! .� � �� '�..�.�r. _ �� - f C��.Lti� F'1' Li Ll.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVEL po MENr xev¢w nME ox - ..-._,r`.��..-.✓-�-' . ... z�,�„�,�.� , , .. . .. . ANALYSIS Site Location and Existing Conditions The 1.803 acre site is a waterfront lot located on the east side of Island Way approximately 550 feet north of the intersection of Island Way and Windward Passage. The subject property is zoned High Density Residential (HDR) District. The intent and purpose of the HDR is to protect and preserve the integrity and value of existing, stable residential neighborhoods of higher density while at the same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and revitalization of existing neighborhoods in need of revitalization or neighborhoods with unique amenities which create unique opportunities to increase property values and the overall attractiveness of the city. The subject property is comprised of one parcel with a frontage of approximately 386 feet along Island Way and 400 feet of waterway frontage along one of the Island Estates channels which leads directly into Clearwater Harbor. A 53 unit attached dwelling condominium, built in 1962, is centrally located on the site. The existing dock measures approximately 40 feet in length and 10 feet in width, with an 80 foot long, four foot wide catwalk which provides access to the six existing boat slips. The existing setbacks are approximately 42 feet to the northern (side) property line and 275 feet to the southern (side) property line. The existing dock will be removed as part of the proposed project. The immediate vicinity is characterized by a mix of density of attached residential dwellings with a variety of accessory uses including, pools, decks, patios and docks and a commercial shopping plaza on the western side of Island Way. The properties along the eastern side of Island Way are waterfront with frontage along the same waterway as the subject property. There are a variety of existing docks, boat lifts and catwalk configurations along the waterway within the vicinity of the subject property. Development Proposal The proposal is to construct a 3,900 square foot, multi-family dock with 22 slips as an amenity to the 53 unit, attached dwelling upland use. The proposed dock and wet slips will be for the private use of the resident owners of the attached dwelling units. The proposed dock will extend in length 68 feet and will measure 300 feet in width with proposed setbacks to the north and south side property lines of 50 feet. The dock will be in harmony with scale, bulk and coverage due to the existing lot size and waterfront lineax footage of the subject property. As the existing property waterfront distance is 400 feet, the maximum width of the dock permitted by the CDC is 300 feet (75% of 400 feet); the maximum permitted length would be 250 feet (75% of 400 feet equals 300 feet, however maximum is 250 feet); the required side setback from a property line is a minimum of ten percent of the waterfront property would be 40 feet (10% of 400 feet) and the project is proposing side setbacks of 50 feet. The project is being reviewed as a Flexible Development application because the proposed multi-use dock exceeds 500 square feet in area and under Section 3-601.C.3 is subject to the requirements of a commercial dock. . Special Area Plan The subject property is located within the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District and the proposed project is subject to the requirements of the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan. The purpose of the neighborhood plan is to provide a framework for neighborhood Community Development Board January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11041 —Page 1 of 14 ° (` �T }p PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT = L�� 1'1' �l�l.� Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ° .s...�.1...Ja�,, :�::,..��. ...�� . K�;...,. �.� . .. . enhancements, change, and maintenance. The plan serves as an official document for the community of Island Estates and the City of Clearwater. It should be used to coordinate public and private initiatives as well as to provide the basis for the implementation of development standards unique to the neighborhood. While the plan does not specifically address docks and marina structures, the Goals and Objectives portion of the plan identifies waterfront and canals. The Waterfront and Canals Goal is to maintain safety, views, access, and water quality along the Island Estates waterfront. There is one Objective that relates to the proposed project: Preserve water views by restricting the heights of fences and structures in the waterfront yard and by maintaining established side building setbacks, rear building setbacks and site triangles. The proposed project supports this objective in that the proposed dock will preserve water views by adhering to the required setbacks distances and not negatively impacting the sight distance triangles along the waterway. Comprehensive Plan The proposal is supported by applicable various Goals, Objectives and/or Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan as follows: Future Land Use Plan Element Objective A. S. S- Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity. The proposal includes the construction of a multi-use dock providing 22 slips with 16 10,000- 13,000 lb. boat lifts, four 16,000-20,000 lb. boat lifts which will serve as an accessory use to the existing attached dwelling use. The majority of the surrounding properties also feature a variety of dock structures as consistent with the sizes of the properties and frontages along the waterway. The subject property is significantly laxger than most of the surrounding parcels which provides the opportunity for the size and scale of the proposed dock. The proposal will meet all of the required bulk and dimensional specifications for a multi-use dock as detailed within the CDC. The proposal will enhance the existing waterfront use and is supported by this Objective. Policy A.5.5.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. As mentioned above, the proposal is consistent with other docks in the area with regard to the size and configuration of the subject property, complies with all requirements of the CDC and is consistent with this Policy. Community Development Code The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and basic �lanning objectives of the CDC as follows: Section 1-103.B.1. Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through innovative and creative redevelopment. The subject site is located within the HDR District with the surrounding area being zoned with a combination of MHDR, Commercial, HDR and Preservation (waterway) Districts. The size, location and shape of the parcel are significantly larger than the other parcels in the associated HDR District and the MHDR District with respect to waterfront properties. The proposed multi- use dock, set of davits and boatlifts are similar to other docks and boatlifts in the area with regard Community Development Board January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11041 — Page 2 of 14 � t�T + 4. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT � C e�� r1' alel Level II Flexibie Development Application Review nEVe,LOrn�NT xEEV�.w nivtscox J �./�./��J��.k��'ra .f�.�".i�a�k'R. €y . :..f.� y , . . to the configuration permitted by the CDC based on lot size and waterway property frontage. The proposal will decrease the amount of disturbed silt by providing the opportunity for boat owners to pull into their slips bow-first thereby keeping propellers in deeper water. The proposed configuration of the dock and catwalks will allow for safer boarding and de-boarding of boats providing an enhancement of the property. Therefore this Code section is applicable to and in support of this proposal. Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties. Surrounding properties are a mix of attached and detached dwellings with a variety of accessory structures typical of waterfront detached dwellings such as pools, patios, decks and docks. The proposed multi-use dock and boatlifts/davits will result in a property developed similarly to surrounding properties. The proposal is consistent with the established character of the neighborhood and meets this Code section. Section 1-103. B. 3. Strengthening the city's economy and increasing its tax base as a whole. The proposal will provide 22 boat slips with boatlifts, catwalks and dock area for the 53 attached dwelling unit condominium building located on the subject property. The proposed accessory use will provide enhanced amenities to the residents of the existing use. The proposal will be consistent with the character of the area with regard to the proposed dock and the existing lot configuration and size. Additionally, the proposed dock meets all of the dimensional and bulk requirements of the CDC. Therefore the proposal meets this Code section. Section 1-103.D. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of the city a matter of the highest priority and to require that existing and future uses and structu�-es in the city are attractive and well-maintained to the maximum extent permitted by law. The proposal includes a professionally designed multi-use dock with related boatlifts, davits and catwalks. The proposal will provide an enhanced amenity to the existing residential use and will further provide access to and enjoyment of the waterway. Therefore the proposal meets this Code section. Code Enforcement Analysis There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Community Development Board January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11041 — Page 3 of 14 ��1.(�1 �l'�l�l Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review ° �✓^�._i�.�r-��.,i.`°'':�;;��^; i�z �^s�`. �: "�.�.�'" . . .. � � . . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL DOCKS �SECTION 3-601.C.3.a-g) The development proposal has been found to be consistent with the criteria for commercial docks. Specific responses to each of these criteria have been provided by the applicant and are included with their application. The individual criteria for commercial docks (and multi-use docks which shall be reviewed as commercial docks based on square footage) are set forth in the following table: 1. The proposed dock shall be subordinate to and contribute to the comfort, convenience or necessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use of the properly. 2. The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent properties and the neighborhood in general. 3. The proposed dock shall be compatible with dock patterns in the general vicinity. 4. Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities. The use of the proposed dock shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons cunently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, it shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent waterway by uses including but not limited to non-motorized boats and motorized boats. 5. Impacts on Navigation. The existence and use of the proposed dock shall not have a detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, recreational or other public conveniences. 6. Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid injury to marine grassbeds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas. 7. Docks shall not have an adverse impact upon natural marine habitats, grass flats suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life, or established marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of a type useful as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs and any such artificial reef which has developed an associated flora and fauna which have been determined to be approaching a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and diversity; oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or sport fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habitats desirable as juvenile fish habitat. 8. All turning basin, access channels, boat mooring azeas and any other area associated with a dock shall have adequate circulation and existing water depths to ensure that a minimum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the water body at mean or ordinary low water (-0.95 NGVD datum). 9. The dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to be located. 10. The dock shall not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest. 11. The dock shall not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative, terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species providing one or more of the reyuirements to sustain their existence, such as range, nesting or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which would serve to make them rare within the confines of the City; designated preservation areas such as those identified in the comprehensive land use plan, national wildlife refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated preservation areas, and bird sanctuaries. 12. Impacts on Wetlands HabitatlUplands. The dock shall not have a material adverse affect upon the uplands surrounding. Community Development Board January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11041 — Page 4 of 14 Consistent � Inconsistent X 1.-7 X X 1� X X X X X X X � �IT + PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT r C�� 1'�Le� Level II Flexible Development App�ication Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � ��. r w� � ��. ; . � � � COMPLIANCE WITH DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS Setbacks: The dimensional standards criteria set forth in CDC Section 3-601.C.3.h.i) identify the required setbacks for a commercial or multi-use dock with detached dwellings, two-unit attached dwellings and non-residential properties under subsection a) and b) which is not applicable to the subject property. Subsection c states that in all other circumstances, commercial and multi-use docks shall be located so that the setback from any property line as extended into the water shall be a minimum of ten percent of the applicant's waterfront property width measured from the side property lines. The width of the waterfront property line on the subject property is 400 feet; therefore the proposed dock must be set back from the north and south property lines 40 feet and the proposed project includes a setback of 50 feet. The proposed setback distance complies with the CDC requirements. Length: Commercial and multi-use docks shall not extend from the mean high water line or seawall of the subject property more than 75 percent of the width of the subject property as measured along the waterfront property line, up to a maximum of 250 feet. The property features 400 feet of waterfront property which would permit a dock length of 300 feet or in this case 250 feet maa�imum. The proposed dock length is 68 feet which is significantly less than 250 feet and therefore complies with the requirements of the CDC. Width: Commercial and multi-use docks facilities shall not exceed 75 percent of the width of the property measured at the waterfront property line. The property features 400 feet of waterfront property which would permit a dock of 300 feet in length. The proposed dock is 300 feet which is consistent with the requirements of the CDC. The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with the standards and criteria as per CDC Section 3-601.C3.h.(i-iii): Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent Dock Setbacks 10% of the width of the subject North: 50 feet X (Minimum) property (40 feet) South: 50 feet X Dock Length 75% of the width of the subject 68 feet (Maximum) property (300 feet) X Dock Width 75% of the width of the subject 300 feet (Maximum) property (300 feet) X Community Development Board January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11041 — Page 5 of 14 Y��l.�l �!'�L�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review ' �...�'�i�"�'i^�.i ;�.�'F�.�3 �.,'w,Mx' . _, .. . . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual. acoustic and olfactorv and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Consistent I Inconsistent X X X X X X SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting on December 5, 2013, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 1.8 acre site is a waterfront lot located on the east side of Island Way approximately 550 feet north of the intersection of Island Way with Windward; 2. The subject property is located within the High Density Residential (HDR) District and the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. The subject property is comprised of one parcel with approximately 400 feet of frontage along Island Way and 400 feet of frontage along the water; 4. The subject property is located within the Island Estates Neighborhood Overlay District which is subject to the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan; 5. The proposal includes the construction of a 3,900 square foot dock with 22 slips, boatlifts and related catwalks; 6. The proposed dock meets all required bulk and dimensional standards of the CDC; 7. The dock will be accessory to the existing attached 53 unit condominium use; and, 8. There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law 1. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law and that the development proposal is consistent with the following: 1. The pattern of development of the surrounding neighborhood; Community Development Board January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11041 — Page 6 of 14 ° �T + 4. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT : C ear ►l' alel Levei II Flexibie Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REV�W DIVISION � ��,�J�� .,.. � 2. Applicable portions of the Comprehensive Plan including Future Land Use Plan Element Obj ective A.5.5 and Policy A.5.5.1; 3. The general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of the Community Development Code Sections 1-103.B.1— 3 and D; 4. Applicable Standards as per Table 2-303 of the Community Development Code; 5. The General Standards for Level One and Two Approvals as per Section 3-914.A.1 — 6 of the Community Development Code; 6. The General Criteria for Commercial Docks as per Section 3-601.C.3.a — h. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a 3,900 square foot Multi-Use Dock as accessory to an existing attached dwelling unit complex under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-601.C.3 and offers the following as Conditions of Approval: Conditions of Approval: General/Miscellaneous Conditions 1. That use of the docks be for exclusive use for the mooring of boats residents and/or their guests and that the docks are not permitted to be rented, leased or sold separately; 2. That issuance of a development permit by the City of Clearwater does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the City for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law; 3. That all other applicable local, state andlor federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development; Timing Conditions 4. That application for a building permit be submitted no later than January 21, 2015, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407; 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150 percent of its rated capacity; and 6. That prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of the General Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Fire Departments be addressed. � Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: � �' Melissa H. Baker, AICP, Planner II Community Development Board January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11041 —Page 7 of 14 Melissa H. Baker, AICP, NJPP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater Florida 33756 727-562-4567 x2855 melissa.hauck-baker(�a,mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner II, Development Review Division - July 2013 to Present City of Clearwater, FL Provide professional urban planning services to citizens, City Offcials and businesses regarding Land Development Review procedures and legal requirements of the Community Development Code for the City. Assist in the day to day planning and zoning operations as well as long range planning initiatives, interdepartmental cooperation and assistance. Conduct plan reviews, site investigations, report preparation, meeting attendance and presentation of fndings as relating to proposed development projects and required regulatory review procedures. Professional Planner Consultant - March 2010 to June 2013 Melissa Hauck Baker, AICP, NJPP Provide consulting services to clients as requested for various residential and commercial scale projects as relating to the necessary zoning and planning review processes required by the specific governing entity. Supervise the preparation of reports and plans, conduct site visits, attend and present iindings at municipal and all related public meetings, coordinate with applicant, various municipal staff and related professional consultants. Senior Associate — January 2005 to March 2010 Project Manager - Apri12001 to January 2005 KEPG, LLC, Atlantic City, NJ Oversee consulting services provided to municipal clients in the area of zoning, planning, master planning and redevelopment planning. Review all proposed projects before any required municipal board, authority and commission as well as any additional jurisdictional requirement of other local, state and federal entities. Provide professional guidance regarding planning and zoning concepts, zoning ordinance development, urban design issues, master plans, and redevelopment plans as outlined within the New Jersey Municipal Land Use Law. Supervise the preparation of reports and plans, conduct site visits, attend and present findings at municipal and all related public meetings, coordinate with firm staff, various municipal staff and related consultants to effectuate an efficient and thorough review process. • Zoning Administrator - June 1998 to Apri12001 • City Planner - November 1994 to May 1998 • Historic Preservation Specialist - September 1993 to October 1994 City of Reading, PA Staff liaison and administrator to the Zoning Hearing Board, Planning Commission, Historic Architectural Review Board, Reading Redevelopment Authority and Fine Arts Board. Enforcement, interpretation and regulatory cooperation of the following ordinances; subdivision, land development, historic preservation, redevelopment and zoning. Provide assistance with downtown, neighborhood, comprehensive master plan, parks, recreation, and public property planning. Conduct site inspections, process violations, and pursue cases through the court system. Assist with review of proposed development projects in conjunction with planning, engineering, and building code staff as well as with the preparation of the Comprehensive Master Plan. Generate graphics for various presentations as required by the department. EDUCATION Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, State University of New York, Syracuse, 1993 LICENSES AND ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIPS American Institute of Certiiied Planners #023351 (2009 to Present) American Planning Association (2001 to Present) Florida Chapter (2013 to Present) New Jersey Chapter (2001 to 2012) Licensed New Jersey Professional Planner #33LI00609500 (2009 to Present) ° Clear�ater U`e...� P�annian� �r. Develop�eant D�p��tm�ni: Fic�x�ble IDevelopr�tent Applicatio�. Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Nan-Residenti�l Use.r IT IS INCUMBENT UPOfV THE APPLICANT TO SUBNdIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT IR�FORMATION. AfUV MISL�tA[71NG, DECEPTBVE, INCCDMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATI(3fV MAY IfVVAL6DATE VOlD9d APPLBCATIORi. • ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FIILED OUT COMPLE7"ELY P.ND CORRECTLY, AND 5UB6WITTED IN PERSOPJ (NO �AX 06i DELIVERIESi TO THE PLAI�lNIIi9G & D�VELOPhVIENT DEPARTM�Il�T 6Y NOON Of� THE SCHEDULED DEA�LiP!E DA'I'E. A TOTAL OF 11 COBVIPLETE SETS OF �LANS AIND P��PL9CATION R�VA�'ERIALS (1 ORIGIfVAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITWIM ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEVI/ BY THE DEV�LOPMEN�' REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBS[:QUEIVT SUB�VIITTAL FOP2 THE: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEIVT B�AF2D WI�L RE62Ul62E 15 C0�1/lPLE i E SETS OF PBAfVS AfVD APPLIC,hTION iVIATERIALS (1 OR161i��il. AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICAT&ON5 ARC REQUIRED TO L�E COLI.ATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED 'INTO 5E�'S. THE APPUCAIUT, BY FILING THIS AO��LICATi�N, AGR�tES T�7 C�GViPLY WI7'H ALL APPLICABLE REQU16t�MENTS OF Yh1E COMhViUlVITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAfV REVIEW F�E: $Z00`` APPUCATIOIV FEE: �$4,2�� PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): ISLAND WAY TOWERS �LC MAILIN6 ADDRESS: 1 a3 ROSEDALE DRIVE, LAFAYETfE LA 70508 PHONE NUMBER: 727-480-9285 EMAIL: gregwhembreeC�aol.co.uk AGENT OR REP92ESENTATIVE: Terri Skapik, Woods Consulting MAILING ADDRESS: 7�14 County Road 1 Suite 22, Dunedin, FI. 34698 PHONE NUMBER: 727-786-5747 EMAIL: terriskapik@woodsconsulting.org ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 223 Island Way PARCEL NUMBER(5): 08/29/15/43326/000/0060 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER UNIT 2 LOTS 6 TO 9 INCL PROPOSED USE(S): Commercial dock (more than 500 sq ft) as accessory use to primary upland dwellings DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: 3,900 sq ft commercial dock as accessory use to existing �pland attached dwellings. Speci};c❑lly identify the request No variances are being requested. Dock conforms to city clock a�des for side setbacks, width (include all requested code flexibility; and lengih. No changes proposed to upland development. e.g., reduction in required number of parlring spaces, height setbacks, fot size, !oY width, specific use, etc.): Planning &� De+�elapmeot !�epartment, 100 S. Myrtle �4venue, Cleanwater, FL 33756, Tel: 7?7-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01/12 �� f ° �lear��.ter � r U �laa�aaing �r. Develc�pnnent Dep�ri�eanb: F��xib�e ��vel�j�me�t 1�pplic�t�o�. �� Y��$: PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWIfVG IMFOR�IAATION IS FILL�� CD�T, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILl6fiE TO C01i/IPLETE THIS FORfU WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATIOfV BEIt�IG FOl9iVD INCOI�fiPL�T� Afi9� POSSI�LY [IEFEF2RED UNTIL TBiE FOLLOV111NC' APPLBCA710N CYCLE. ZOtVB�lG 1385iFfICT: FUTURE !Ail�D USE P9AN DESIGIi�ATICiitl: �eXISTIMG USE (currently existing on site): iiDR RH ariached dwellings PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): no change to upland use SITE AREA: sq. ft. i.E03 GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: N/A Sq, {t. Proposed: N/A yq.{rt. Maximum Allowable: N�A sq. ft. acres GROSS FLl70Ft AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there wiil be multiple uses}: First use: N/A sq. ft. Second use: N/A sq.ft. Third use: h!!A Sq, {t, FLO�R AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the eotal square footage of entire site): Existing: N/A Proposed: N/A Maximum Allowa6le: N/A BUILDIMG COVERAGE/F007PRIIVT (1�` floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: N/A sq. it. ( %a of site) Proposed: N/A sq, it. ( % of site} Maximum Permitted: N/A sq. ft. ( % of sitej GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHiCl9L4R USE AREA (green space within the paricing lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: N/A sq. {t. ( % of site) Proposed: N/A Sq. {t, ( % of site) VEH9CULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: N/A sq. ft. ( Proposed: N/A sq. ft. ( % of site) % of site) Planning & Development Departrnent, 100 5. Myrtle Avemue, Clearwater, FL 33756, 'Pel: 727-562�4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised Di/12 �, 1 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (tatai square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: N/A Proposed: N/A Maximum Permirted: N/A DENSI7'Y (units, rooms or beds per acre) Existing: ��A Proposed: wA Maximum Permitted: N/A OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: N(A Praposed: N/A Minimum Required: N/A BUILDING HElGHT: Existing: N/A Proposed: wA Maximum Permitted: WA WHAT IS TIiE ESTIMATED 7U7AL VALUE OF THE PRQJECf IJPON COMPLETION? $ ZON{N6 DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADIACENT PROPERTY: North: MHDR South: NDR East: P W est: C STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNIY OF PINELlAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that afl Sworn to and subscribed before me this .3�� dey af representations made in this application are true and �, ,�j� r 3 , to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the �__�� o is personally known has . � � property described in thi application, produced as i enti ication. .�% � ,/�. _ � �h''�. //�/io, 1,r v,l � . , ti ��.-�-- i� � ,. - - - - - � Signature of properry owner or representative Notary p(�411c, � �jgzabeth S. �sroussard My commission expires: �radlev &, lUlc��°eau PT,a IV.P,y �o�n�azi��i�n s�x�ai��;� �t �Dea9;h Planning 8 Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenuc, Clearwater, PL 33756, Tel: 72T•562�4567; Fau: 727-562ji865 Page 3 of 8 Revised 01H2 � a ]Plannnng � Develo �ffient Depa�tnaen� � C earv�at�r 1�lc�x�bl� Devel�pin�en�i pip�lic�tio� � �fl�� I'l�a� 5ub�itt�1 I�ackagc� Chec� lisg IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLEfED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPIVtENT (FLD) APPLICATIOfV, AL! FLD APPLICE1Ti IOS�95 SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKA6E THAT IIVCLUDES TFIE �OLLOWIRiG INF�6iMATIOIV AND/OR PLAfdS: Q✓ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth i� the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Fiexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. �✓ Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Fle:�ible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. �✓ A signed and sealed survey of the properry prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public ar�d private easements including official records bool< and page numbers and street right(s}-of-way within and adjacent to the site. ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mo6ile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that iriformation required by Section 4-202..A.5. ❑✓ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marinz, pie.•, seawall or other si milar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shail not I�e required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. ❑ A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimuin scale of one inch equais 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: D Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced th areon. ❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. 0 Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. ❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located witf�in a 5�ecial Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (6FE) of the property, as applicable. ❑ Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on t+�e site. D Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site anc off-site, with proposed points of access. ❑ Location of all existi�g and proposed sidewalks, curbs, �vater lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and seawalls and any proposed utiliry easements. ❑ Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as weli as a r�arrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storrn Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of buiiding con:>truction permit. ❑ Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for acc�ssibility for collection. � Location of off-street loading area, if required by 5ection 3-1406. l7 All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, e:cisting median cuts and intersections and bus shelters. C] Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacl:s, structural overhangs and building separations. ❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials. Planning 8 Develapment Department, 100 5. Myrtle Avenue, Cleannrater, FL 33756, Tel: 7:'7-562•4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01/12 ) � ❑ Typical floor plans, including floor plans for eath floor of any parking garage. 0 Demolition plan. ❑ Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen tre�s, ar�d other environmentally sensitive areas. ❑ If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 5�% (excludi�rg those standards where the difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be provided. The findings af the study wili be used in determining whether or not deviation�; to the parking standards are appraved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further informat:on. ❑ A tree survey showing the lacation, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inche� or more, and identifying those trees proposed to be removed, if any. 0 A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, af all trees four inches D8H or more that reflects the size, canopy, anc condition of such trees may be required if deemed app(icable by staff. Cheek with staff. O A Traffic Impact Study shafl be required for all proposed developments if the totaf gener;3ted net new trips meet one or mare of the following conditions: ■ Proposai is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, int�ound or outbound on the abutting streets) and/or 1,Q00 or more new trips per day; or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degradas the level of service as adopted in the City's Comptehensive Pfan to unacceptable levels; or � The study area contains a segmenC of roadway and/or intersection with five repar�abie accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, providet by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or � The Traffic Operatians Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway ar development. with unknawn trip generation and/or other unknown factors. ❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any projecC where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improvec'. or remodeled in a ualue of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser'� current retards, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a ��arki�lg lot requires additionai landscaping pursuant to the provisions oF Article 3, Division 7.4. The landscape plan shall include the following informaYion, ir not otherwise required in conjunctian with the application for development approval: Cl Localion, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed land�cape materials, includin�; botanical and common names. [] Existing trees on-sit� and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, includiag drip line. G Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in squarE feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area caverage of the parking lot anc vehicular use areas. ❑ Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not fimited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted Cransformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines. sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of afl ground surFaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape. C] Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aiSEes, interiar landscape islands and curbing. ❑ Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and boCtom elevations. ❑ Defineation ancl dimensians of a[I required perimeter landscaped bufFers including sight trianglrs, if any. Planning 8 Dcvelopment Repartment, 100 S. flfiyrtle Avenue, COearvvater, FL 33756, Tel: 7 27-562-4567; F�x: 727-562-d865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 01112 �� o �` �lann�ng �c Dr�velc�prnien� Dep��t�ane�n�: � l,� ��r ��gble ID�vel��nent A.�plflc�tba�n � �e��raIl Appl��ca�ifli� Cri�terIl�. PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES T�'1 EACH OF T6i� SIX (6) GENEIRP�L APPLICABILITY C6iITER1A EXPflAIMtNG HO1Al, IfN aETA1L, TFIE: CRITERION IS BEING COMPL9ED WOTH PER TWIS D�l/[LOt�n/IENT P�:�POSAL 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. SEE Al-fACHED CXHIBIT 1 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or wo�king in the neighborhood of the proposed use. SEE A-f-fACHED EXHI�IT 1 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediace vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, ineluding visual, acousf:ic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. fUlyrtle Avenue, CEearwate�, FL 33756, Tel: 7"1.7-562•4567: Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01I12 �� o �l�nni�ag � De��elop�ent Depau-�en� � C ear�ater �Ic��bl� l�ev�l�pan.en��i A�p�pl�ca�io� � �� Fle��rili�r Cr��e�°i� PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPORlSES i0 iH� Af��LECABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USIE(S) E.EING REQUESTED AS S�T FORTH IN THE ZONIN6 DISTRICf(5) IIV WHICH T6iE SUBJECT �ROP�ei2iY IS LOCATED. EXPLABIJ H04V, IN DETAOL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITi H PER THIS DEVELOF�9ViENT PROPOSAL (U5E S�PARAiE SHEETS AS I�ECES'_�ARYj. 1. SEE ATfp�HED EXH1BIi 2 2. SEE ATiA�HED EX�iBB 9 2 3. S�E ATTA�HED E�B�IBIT 2 4. SEE A�ACFiED �::FlI�IT 2 s. SEE ATTA�I—IEC7 �XF-99E31T 2 6, S�E ,ATi�4CHED EXB—�11��T 2 ,. S�E ATTAC�FiED EXHIBIT 2 8. SEE ATTACHED EXHI�IT 2 Planning & Development Department, 700 S. Myetle Avenue, Clean+uater, FL 33756, Tel: 7:?7-562�Sfi7; Fax: 727-562�865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01112 / � i o Planning & Development Departrnent � � earwater Flexible Develapment Application " Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide narnes of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: ISLAND WAY TOWERS LLC 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: 223 ISLAND WAY, CLEARW�TER 33767 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): 3,900 SQ FT COMMERCIAL DOCK (DOCK GREATER THAN 5D0 SQ FT) 4. That the undersigned (has/haveJ appointed and (does/do) appoint: TERRI SKAPIK/ WOODS CONSULTING as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this applicatian and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certifi/ that the fore oi� �is tr and c ec� a RICHARD PAUL BEAUL�IEU � Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Properly Owner STAT� OF FLORIDA, C�UNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, �N THIS I.�:'-` + DAY OF ____ , d LDl� , PERSONALLY APPEARED �''C a cy�'Y'.OL. J��J1 I I��L(L(.Ll �( C�IJ� WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/5HE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. "I'ikti��l�a�" .J, ��itit�l�� •+✓' �3radley & ;Nloreau, AP1�L N Iiar I;.�.l� �!4`�_+'�.�'.a7�, Notarl)c$e3IY8tsm��'e=5E+D7�� =;%��;>:,:`� *:�r ��' MyCommissionExpires: Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Ciearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562.4567; Fau: 727-562-4865 Page 8 of 8 Revised 01/12 � � ..s Exhibif 1: Written Submittal Requirements Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria Island Way Towers Commercial Dock Application ' Request: Construct a 3,900-sqft multi-family dock with (22) slips as an amenity to upland attached dwellings. No variances are being requested. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coveraqe, densitv and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed upland development was recently approved for 53 attached dwellings (a reduction from 88 units from the previous development) and the dock anc� wet slips will be for the private use of the resident owners of the attached dwelling units. The City's dock codes define the dimensional standards for the proposed dock based on the length of waterFront owned. As designed, the proposed dock meets all of the City's dimensional standards and no variances are being requested. Although the proposed dock may appear larger than the docks in the immediate area, the proposed dock will be in harmony with the scale, bulk and coverage because of the much larger water-frontage of shoreline owned by the Applicant. Many of the docks in the immediate area are private residential docks that are defined by the private dock dimensional standards and based on much smaller waterfronts. Private docks are limited to one dock and two boat slips (not including personal watercraft). Multi-family docks are defined are designed based on the lengfih of shoreline owned which is 400 ft for Island Way Towers. Therefore, 50 ft side backs are provided whereas only 40 ft side setbacks are required by code, the maximum width is exactly 300 ft, as allowed by code, (based on 400 ft of shoreline; max width = 400 x 75% or 300 ft) and the maximum length is 68 ft which is much less than would be allowed by the dimensional length standard (400 ft of shoreline; max length = 75% or 300 ft). The reduced length is to not exceed 25% the width of the waterway at this location. The proposed dock does not exceed the Unit: Slip Ratio as there are 53 approved residential units and only 22 slips are proposed. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discouraqe the appropriate development and use of adiacent land and buildinq or siqnificantiv impair the value thereof The proposed dock will not hinder or discourage appropriate use and development of adjacent land or impair the value thereof. In fact, the proposed dock will significantly improve the value of the surrounding properties. The proposed dock provides greater side setbacks than allowed by code (50 ft versus 40 ft), does not exceed the maximum length allowed by code (300 ft) and is much shorter than the code allows (68 ft versus 300 ft). No variances are being requested. Additionally, the proposed dock does not impede ingress or egress to the neighboring docks and does not impede navigation. Great consideration a -'! was given in designing the proposed dock to ensure the proposed dock would not impede use of the waterway in this area. The maximum dock length of 300 ft �Ilowed by code was not feasible as the width of the waterway is the limiting feature of this canal. The proposed dock was reduced in length to not exceed 25% width of the waterway leaving 50% of the waterway open for navigation. The premise to the 25% width of waterway rule is to allow opposite waterfront property owner's docks that do not exceed 25% leaving 50% open for navigation. This is a rule commonly used by the city, county, state and federal permitting agencies. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safetv of persons residinq or workinq in the neiqhborhood of the proposed use. The proposed dock will be for the use by the resident owners. Homeowner's Associations generally establish rules and regulations addressing appropriate behavior, enforcing proper use of boating equipment, enforcing proper use boating and navigation waterways, boater education and environmental education. 4. The proposed development is designed to avoid traffic congestion. The proposed dock will be for the use of the residents or; therefore, no additional traffic will be created by the proposed dock. In fact, the ability for residents to travel the area by boat actually decreases traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistenfi with the communitv character of the immediate vicinitv of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed dock is consistent with the zoning, future land use and Beach by Design. The proposed dock is consistent with the size and scale of large docks that are located in the area of similar water-frontage. The Clearwater Beach area is dependent on the waterfront developments to attract tourists and residents to the area. By having wet slips available to the residents, the proposed dock will improve the community character of the area. 6. The desiqn of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, includinq visual acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on the adiacent properties. There will be no negative adverse effects visually as the proposed dock will be constructed with wood and held in place by wooden pilings. The construction materials and installation requirements will adhere to the Pinellas County dock construction code. There will be no negative adverse effects acoustically as this will operate only as a multi- family dock for resident owners. There will be no commercial activities associated with the docking facility. There are no high/dry slips, no load out, no wash racks, no fueling facilities, etc. There is little noise expected to be generated. There will be no adverse olfactory effects as there is no fixed sewage pumpout station or upland holding tanks proposed, any trash recepfiacles will be emptied by residents daily to make sure there are no garbage odors, and there will be no fish cleaning stations onsite. -, G Exhibit 2: Written Submittal Requirements Responses to the Flexibility Criteria for the specific use being requested as set forth in the Zoning Districts in which the subject property is propose Dock Criteria Section 3-601C.3 (a) through (h) Island Way Towers Commercial Dock Application a. Use and compatibilitv The proposed 3,900-sqft multi-family dock is for use by the residents of the approved upland development of attached dwellings. As regards the use and compatibility of and docking facility, the use of docks in the area are tied to their respective upland uses such that hotel docks should only be used by hotel guests and residential docks should only used by unit owners. The proposed upland development was recently approved for 53 attached dwellings (a reduction from 88 units from the previous dsvelopment). The use of the proposed dock will be for the private use of the resident owners of the attached dwelling units. The City's dock codes define the dimensional standards for docking facilities and the proposed dock meets all of the City's dimensional standards and no variances are being requested. Based on 400 ft of shoreline owned by the Application, the side setbacks are 50 ft where only 40 ft are required, the maximum dock width is exactly 300 ft as allowed (400 ft of shoreline; max width = 400 x 75% or 300 ft) and the maximum length is 68 ft which is in fact much less than would be allowed by city's dimensional length standard (400 ft of shoreline; max length = 75% or 300 ft). The reduction in length is to ensure 50% of the waterway remains open for navigation and docks do not extend more than 25% the width of the waterway. Although the dock may appear larger than the docks in the immediate area of this canal, they are in harmony with the scale, bulk and coverage established in the dock codes based on large water-frontage of this property being 400 ft. Many of the docks in the immediate area are private residential docks that are defined by a different set of dock codes which are limited to one dock and two boat slips (not including personal watercraft). Multi-family docks are defined by the length of shoreline owned which is 400 ft for Island Way Towers. Even though there are 53 approved units, only 22 slips are proposed to meet the city codes and not request a variance. b. Impacts on existinq water recreation activities. The proposed dock will not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses. The dock will not preclude the existing uses of the adjacent waterway. The proposed dock does not impede navigation or use of existing recreational areas. The maximum length is extremely reduced from that allowed by code based on the length of owned waterFroi�t, the dock does not exceed the width of the waterway and the dock provides more distance in side setbacks than required (50 ft side setbacks are provided versus 40 ft required by code) c. Impacts on naviqation. The dock as proposed will not have a detrimental impact on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transpoitation, recreational or other public conveniences. As noted above meets all of the city's dimensional standards for multi-family docking facilities and does not exceed a length greater than 25% the width of the waterway. This allows for more than 50% of the waterway to remain open for safe navigation. d. Imaacts on marine environment. The site was surveyed for the presence of protected resources such as sea grass beds and none were present. The Applicant is also proposing to install (1) "Florida Friendly Boating" sign and (1) "Caution Manatee" to inform boaters of protected resources in the area. e. Impacts on water quality. All turning basin, boat mooring areas and any other area associated with use of the proposed dock will liave adequate circulation and existing water depths to ensure that a minimum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel and the bottom at mean low water. The proposed dock will not cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling ofi channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed. The mooring of vessels at the multi-family dock is not expected to adversely impact water quality as lifts are proposed in the majority of the slips to elevate boats above the water. The dock will be installed using treated timber pilings that are vinyl-wrapped from the mud-line to 2 ft above the mean high water line to prevent leaching of copper, arsenic and/or chromium from the timber into the water. Also, there are no fueling, no marine service activities, no wash-racks, no commercial activities, etc. that would contribute to a water quality problem. Impacts on natural resources. The proposed dock will not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest. The dock will not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative, terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species. As previously stated ab'ove, sea grass beds are not present in the area of the proposed dock. g. Impacts on wetlands habitat/uplands. The proposed dock will not have a material adverse affect upon the uplands surroundings. There are no upland wetlands, only surface waters and there is no submerged vegetation at the site. 4 h. Dimensional standards. The dimensiona{ standards for proposed multi-family docks are determined by the length of shoreline owned by the applicant. Setbacks for multi-family docks shall be located so that the setback from any property line as extended into the water shall be a minimum of 10% of the applicant's waterFront property measured from the side property lines. The proposed dock meets the required side setbacks based on the shoreline of the parcel being 400 ft. The side setbacks as proposed are 50 ft on either side whereas 40 ft are required by code. The width for multi-family docks shall not exceed 75% of the applicant's waterFront property measured from the side property lines. Based on a shoreline of 400 ft, the maximum dock width allowed is 300 ft as proposed. The length for multi-family docks shall not extend from the mean high water line or seawall of the applicant's property more than 75% of the width of the applicant's property measured at the waterfront property line. The length of the proposed dock in this case is to be 300 feet. However, the width of the waterway does not make it possible to extend the docks the maximum length allowed by code. The proposed dock is limited to a maximum length of 68 ft to not exceed 25% the width of the waterway at this location which is 280 ft; 25% width of wafierway is 70 ft. 0 RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS En�ineering Review Prior to review bv Communitv Development Board: 1. Please show all existing easements and utilities on Sheet FP-9. REPLY FP-9 has been revised to show all easements and utilities. 2. Please acknowledge in writing that as per Community Development Code Section 3-806 - Easements and rights-of-way, the City has the right to remove, without cost or obligation to replace or restore, any fence, wall and/or landscaping as may be necessary to maintain the utilities located in the easement. REPLY Acknowledged Prior to Buildin� Permit: 1. If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. REPLY Acknowledged Genera) Note: 1. Only Sheet FP-9 was reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction plans shall be reviewed in more detail prior to receipt of the building permit. REPLY Acknowledged Environmental Review Prior to Buildin� Permit: 1. Provide erosion control measures on plans sheet and provide notes detailing erosion control methods. REPLY Acknowledged 2. A dock/dredge and fill permit may be required prior to conducting any additions. Contact Pinellas County Water and Navigation Authority at (727) 453-3385 for more information. REPLY Acknowledged General Note(s1: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. REPLY Acknowledged 1 2. Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), F.A.C. 62-621(2). REPLY Acknowledged 3. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. REPLY Acknowledged Fire Review 1. Standpipe connection for dock area must be connected to firepump / wet standpipe system ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. REPLY Acknowledged, fire protection consultant explains FP9 shows the connection to the system via node point S6. If you refer to FP3 & FP4 (sheets also enclosed), it continues to show the piping system and its location. 2. Must meet all conditions of NFPA-303 Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and Boatyards 2006 Edition; note that this will include Portable Fire Extinguishers ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. REPLY Acknowledged, fire protection consultant has added note on FP-9. Land Resource Review General Notes: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. REPLY Acknowledged PLANNING REVIEW General Site Plan and Aaplication Comments: 1. Please provide the project valuation. REPLY $335,000 General Applicabilitv Criteria: 2. Criterion One: Applicant has provided that the proposed dock is replacing an existing dock which will provide for 22 slips specifically for residents of the 53 residential attached dwelling units and meets all of the requirements of the CDC. No additional comment required. REPLY Acknowledged 3. Criterion Two: Applicant has provided that the proposed dock will increase the value of the subject property as well as the surrounding properties. No additional comment required. REPLY Acknowledged 2 4. Criterion Three: Applicant has provided that the proposed dock will be solely for the use of the resident owners and the existing HOA will oversee maintenance. No additional comment required. REPLY Acknowledged 5. Criterion Four: Applicant has provided that the proposed dock will encourage resident travel by boat which will reduce the potential vehicular congestion. No additional comment required. REPLY Acknowledged 6. Criterion Five: Applicant has provided that the proposed dock is consistent with Beach by Design, however, the subject property is located within the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District and consistency with the community character shall be addressed. REPLY Applicant acknowledges the project is located within the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. The project is within the High Density Residential (HDR) District and required to meet Section 2-1602H1 through 4 which addresses parking, fencing, landscaping requirements and outdoor storage. The section does not address additional flexible development criteria for docks. Therefore per Section 2-1602C, "Issues not specifically addressed in this overlay district shall be governed by the remaining provisions of this Community Development Code". 7. Criterion Six: Applicant has provided that the proposed dock will be constructed of wood with wooden pilings and will be consistent with the Pinellas County dock construction code thereby resulting in no negative adverse visual effects. No additional comment required. REPLY Acknowledged Storm water Review 1. Additional conditions may be forth coming based on the responses to other conditions or to new information not on hand at time of review. REPLY Acknowledged Traffic En�ineerin� Review General Note(s): 1) No Transportation Impact Fee due at this time since this is an accessory use to an existing multi-family complex. REPLY Acknowledged 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. REPLY Acknowledged 3 �� l,Q� ��` CITY QF CLEARWATER M�' �i! Q� PLANNING $�C DEVELOPMENT DEI'ARTMENT �9'9�yv� �4y :�1?IVIC,IP.�1L SER PC��',S $L'll.[I)llVC�,�lOO S81PCH MYRTI.E t�FENRE�, CLEARII'A�'I'FR4, FLORIDA 33%76 �.___� °+.�rE,R�r� T�L�rHO�vs (?27) 562-456i Fax (727) �62-45?C #Error Case number: FLD2013-11042 -- 223 ISLAND WAY Owner(s): Island Way Towers Llc 2851 Johnston St Unit 1807 Lafayette, LA 70503-3243 PHONE: 7274809285, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Island Way Towers Llc 2851 Johnston St Unit 1807 Lafayette, LA 70503-3243 PHONE: 7274809285, Fax: No fax, Email: Gregwhembree@aol.Co.Uk Representative: Terri Skapik 1714 County Road Suite 22 Dunedin, FL 34698 PHONE: 7277865747, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Lpcation: The subject property is located at 223 Island Way and consists of 1.8 acres (78,719 SF). The parcel is located along the east side of Island Way approximately 550 feet north of the intersection of Island Way and Windward Passage within the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overaly District. Atlas Page: 267B Zoning District: Island Estates Neighborhood Overlay District Request: Flexible Development application to allow a 3,900 square foot multi-use commercial dock with 22 slips as an accessory use to the existing upland attached dwellings in the High Density Residential (HDR) District with a lot area of 78,719 square feet (1.80 acres), pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3-601.C.3. Proposed Use: Neighborhood Association(s): Presenter: 11 /27/2013 Attached Dwellings Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Melissa Baker, Planner II °EQI:4L E�iPI()YbtE�T �:'�D t�FIIL�IA7T4E ACITON Eh{PLOYER° DRC_Comments The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board: 1. Please show all existing easements and utilities on Sheet FP-9. 2. Please acknowledge in writing that as per Community Development Code Section 3-806 - Easements and rights-of-way, the City has the right to remove, without cost or obligation to replace or restore, any fence, wall and/or landscaping as may be necessary to maintain the utilities located in the easement. Prior to Building Permit: 1. If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be instafled, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Notes: 1. Only Sheet FP-9 was reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction plans shall be reviewed in more detail prior to receipt of the building permit. Environmental Review Prior to issuance of Building Permit: 1. Provide erosion control measures on plans sheet and provide notes 2. A dock/dredge and fill permit may be required prior to conducting any additions. Contact Pinellas County Water and Navigation Authority at (727) 453-3385 for more information. General Note(s): 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), F.A.C. 62-621(2). 3. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. Fire Review 1) Standpipe connection for dock area must be connected to firepump / wet standpipe system ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. 2) Must meet all conditions of NFPA-303 Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and Boatyards 2006 Edition, note that this will include Portable Fire Extinguishers ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. 11/27/2013 2 DRC Comments °EQi:4L Eb{Pt(.)YbtENT �D t�FF11Li1A7TF'E t�("fION EMPLOl'ER° Land Resource Review Land Resource Review: General Notes: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all perFormance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. Planning Review Planning Review General Site Plan and Application Comments 1. Please provide the project valuation. General Applicability Criteria 2. Criterion One: Applicant has provided that the proposed dock is replacing an existing dock which will provide for 22 slips specifically for residents of the 53 residential attached dwelling units and meets all of the requirements of the CDC. No additional comment required. 3. Criterion Two: Applicant has provided that the proposed dock will increase the value of the subject property as well as the surrounding properties. No additional comment required. 4. Criterion Three: Applicant has provided that the proposed dock will be solely for the use of the resident owners and the existing HOA will oversee maintenance. No additional comment required. 5. Criterion Four: Applicant has provided that the proposed dock will encourage resident travel by boat which will reduce the potential vehicular congestion. No additional comment required. 6. Criterion Five: Applicant has provided that the proposed dock is consistent with Beach by Design, however, the subject property is located within the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District and consistency with the community character shall be addressed. 7. Criterion Six: Applicant has provided that the proposed dock will be constructed of wood with wooden pilings and will be consistent with the Pinellas County dock construction code thereby resulting in no negative adverse visual effects. No additional comment required. Stormwater Review 1. Additional conditions may be forth coming based on the responses to other conditions or to new information not on hand at time of review Traffic Eng Review General Note(s): 1. No Transportation Impact Fee due at this time since this is an accessory use to an existing multi-family complex. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 11/27/2013 3 DRC Comments "EQt:�c E�tetc�vMEh7• a�n A:�Fr�:�t��v� Ac�•�o� Ehtr�o��x" �25 �3' 3 6 ' 25' e � 21 ( RI � i: i ,i��?'tli I; � !; Es!,: I ir!i��, —_�-"— -- Waterli�.e Cor�s��ct�o� Inc. �� (2) 3'x50' FINGERS W/4 3' 16,000-20,000 LB LIFTS 25� 7) 40'x3' FINGERS W/19 t4-6 10,000-13,000 LB LIFTS 14'-6" 3' 3' 3' 3' 3' 3' - _ _ - 6 � � � � �50' 3, � 5a' 25' � �5� 25�K1'�25'�25� 4 3' � � 19 18 17 16 � 15 14 q 13 12 � 11 10 025�0 � 7 25O O O� O O O e .. .i�PT� .�� _, i t,Pii:H i �i. i i I I, ...!Ji, .I I� .,._, i.!i !I �Iii,il L 4 !I ii !ll I,_. I; Is I i�, it ili 1 I. Il�ii;iii!ii�i;T:i:llf .! I Ilt i,, i, ..�i:i�_ � 'X300' BOARDWALK Patrick Hecker /s/on d Woy To wers �(ATERLINE�� 4408 Grady Ave. N 223 /s/an d Way � 1" _ cor,srRUCr�oN,iNC. Tampa FL 33614 C/ear-woter, �L PAGE 7 ,;� f::. --- � ' �--' � �� ^�,t ,•� j� L g � � A a � � I ` �• ' •, _a 1�7 V ��r �+! �` � fl _ �}i e t . , �"� -' ,��`, � ,•, � : �._ - -_ er ' ' s Pngee t ... ... .m.� � e . . 's , `� .1. � �. �� „�� 4 � � � �� ,+ atl � * ` ', ��j . . '�� i,.,« " ..� �� p -�•� ' '+°��r. � ` � '_.i, , �,,`�: . B � 1� , 4 �r ; + O 1� � - � * . � ¢ m .+r�A� 1 � 'l�' � �' ' ?�»S �,,'� "�� ' � �r, - .. 'q l' ,i.,,..-�° .L { ' � �,r �.4'! � � . _ - ' ,�' � �, '` `�,. 'r° ^� { `" �'k ,,'i� � ' ._ .. i��p � '1r. .v » � m �' � . ° � ~��y ��.� 4 �� i t +�'��,�. O � . " s y i'.v. 1� �`. � g �1 �'� � " � ,� ,� >� �: , � � � � y �' ^ �� f �i� �.,� �� ti �o �� , �'� � ,�; m � �� ,. �� *� �� m a E, ' �. � ` �* �� , ,`� , q °' � ��;�� r• '� x::� � � , rt F � �s�� :�� # �. d �� ''� ` �� .� � > ,� .4 ' p �"� �' �� ,�+= ��.,�. ir �, � � �ro�� ; �� {," � �'� x �" :,� � �� . , w� �� ; �� , s � �� `��_ " � �y�� a "�"" � � `; �f � °v��'�q�� `T` � � � } ;�, . � �� ty� �. � �� s'Y ,. , ,q ""� �a„l ,�y45 1 �5 �' �::� � g, �p. O � F3 Ed �:D � �: , . ..i � � � . 7 �y i t �Y § ��!� 4 �-� � ,ye�� YiA � } .�`° '�tl� ,4j o I � �' `�. • ��` � �� . X `�ya� ��, G� asa ��s '. �� a"` �?� � - ��4 �-' �' � i � �.*i, �.,s t ,: . �d?�# �i�k y �sn�.y��i�� t � S� � . � � . � �.: 5,�� qq 6 i j� �' � ; � � � » �"� �= t � � # � �� G. � � � F , - �' i � � � � � �� ' ��?+�'�{ �� 'r _ r i i� _ ' `� ± ��,� �*��, E i ' �� ? C° " ��k= �� ti i ��'�� , sa , < � , �. �,� a � �� ,��x � �I �`t • ��< ��/�� ' �`�:��`q � ��! � , x�� r � i „ . ,� �� _ - - i � �..w^�"'."' .� nnw V lI il$ � 4.�s� .. . ' �, Yr = wr I� �., f o �� A _. � ;.��, w�' v r" �_.. 'r°',.� � � . � � �� .•' x ., �.. <-a .r- . ..� � , .. . � -' ` ,'� ` ' ^� �' �'� ..r . ,.�p+A �„�„�.�,:j ...* '�4. �$ L l� � � ��' `y� � i! - 4 � � �l ; ` � '� y ,� �. a �`� � d � !� p �, . i � "W '�� `� a � � S� . j i y �,'�a .` _ ±' _;"�� -�,�. ..� `� � 0 4 0 ;�; ��.. , � ._,�-�.-�:#�,�_� `' � �a�.� .� � � � � , ,� �� .� , � �� r . f a� :� �� ,�e� � ,.�, � � ;_ s.� �, � � ;' f � �- - � �:�°+ � � .,� � D �Q� tr ��!C`-r 4k�. wII"` "�:+a� �` ,�*,a � Y C M� � ..� . �,. .s�k �"�` �` ,°�.�� ` � � �" �' �.�� y � i� ry � � e. �A� ,� r, �� . N � w,� .,.-.-�-°.�:�, I�""� �'+ '` � `" , `�- 1f ` , � , �- , . ,' , �* � �r, �. �� =�" � ! � � �h � "�+ ,k �;+'"�!�`��. . °....:.." �. .^'.e Z � � e� '�� "p � � � P. .s i'� � ,,,a':. � F+ � � ws �� +S � ��, 4� �.s � �, k U �CJ . , , Y , e. �$ � ,. ; ,; ,.. . o t , "``!� ,r: .�... ° ` v t ,,Z,, � a � � <,� _ — � .� �, �w, ' . � � F , ,, � ` s � - . .-`� � `� ,�, - ... ' ;�i�} iJ�fr, r � - d. 4S4rE � » i,,, y t " �.� � .� � p., � . � ;, � , a «F� � ° �,,, � � - .,� � o � . • ��. ��iJ� b, a�"«� � ., � � ° +�� a� �� . M. . ��` � y S�t_�,�Y .r�;� �w,..��. � �y. � " � :� �� a � N �, � . , �, � - � ,� � �P .� � " — � .x n, , . N* V _. Z � ��?:��'►.. � � * .'�� . ...,. WU �� 4 � :"�� a�� :a` � � � . . � .� �r#` :�' �� *fx � �� } � .,'" .�,� �'.'.s.�� "�,..� �z . b .�. +� M �3 '� yi �` µ �U j\ ' aC s �^ +e` �rw+r""'"" Q , *� 0. 1 �` � � � � n.�T ` } �. '�' • ,„jp"��' � W�te�line Constr�ction Inc. r--3 "�1 � tl� ALL PILINGS WILL BE 2.5 CCA �� TREATED. PILINGS WILL BE JETTED �� ; ;�,.; AND HAMMERED WITH A MIN. OF 8 � , PENEfRATION ON DOCKS AND 10 , PENEfRATION_ON__LIFTS �_ tif,. i: ; / �1 __----- ____.— _. � % ALL PILINGS TO 6E ENCASED IN PVC WRAP FROM THE MUD LINE i0 MHWL� ALL SiRWGERS WILL BE PRESSURE TREATED 2°X8'� SPACED 16" ON CENTER DOUBIED ON THE OUTSIDE WITH NO BENTS GREATER THEN 12� AND BOLTED W/�'s" S.S. BOLTS MHW- -- -- — — - -... -- -- — � — _..- -- _ _ _ �.MLW - 2"X10" PRESSURE TREATED SILLS WILL 8E DOU6LED AND BOLTED WITH i'e�� 5.5. BOLTS. TYP I CAL CROSS—SECTION AT FINGERS �—g �--'� _ �MHW — — — _ ---- �,---------�MLW � i � I : I I I I I I ! : � � : � 'I TYPICAL CROSS—SECTION AT BOARDWALK GENERAL DOCK NOTES: 1� ALL PILINGS TO�BE 10" 2.5 CCA TREATED. PILINGS WILL BE JEiTED AND � HAMMERED WITH A MINIMUM OF 8' PENE7RATION ON DOCKS, 10' PENETRATION ON LIFTS AND WILL BE ENCASED IN PVC FROM MUD LINE TO MHWL. 2. PILING CENTER TO CENTER SPACING ON ALL FIXED DOCKS NOT TO EXCEED 12'. - 3. DOCK FRAMING AND DECKING TO BE CONSTRUCTED USING STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS (SCREWS TO BE iYPE SPECIFIC FOR MATERIAL UTILIZED). � � 4. ALL DOCK FRAMING OTHER THEN DECKING TO BE MINIMUM GRADE 2 PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER. 5. DECKING WILL 8E 1"X6"�TREX TRANSEND COMPOSITE FASTENED WITH STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS. 6. COMPOSITE DECK BOARD SPACING AT TIME OF INSTALLATION NOT TO EXCEED Ys�� TO ALLOW FOR CURING - 7. 2"X10" STRINGERS WII.0 BE SPACED 16" O.C. AND DOUBLED ON THE OUTSIDE. 8. 2"X8" SILLS WILL BE DOUBLED AND BOLTED WITH �" 5.5. BOLTS. 9. AL� FRAMING MATERIAL TO 6E .60 ACO TREATED. � � Patrick Hecker /s/on d Woy To we�s Watertina ei3 �%ATERLINE�� 4408 Grady Ave. N 223 /s/on d Woy � 1^ =NTS NTs cc�NS-r��x.°rier�i �rac Tampa FL 33614 C/eor-wo ter, F-L PacE .�� _ � "#� ��. \ • � �'• A � "'#.� ,,, ,��'" . �'' �f J �+.~'„ „�. �' t��r �.,+`, }��. +.� r �'. . ,,� t�. — .V. � ♦��., � . ! �� F� J j� T. :�� t+ ,,,_„ ; � l�� _. ;�,- .?�,��,� �- � , � �L� � � a I �+, �a N}� � —1977 � � 4.. . . �;,;. � ; �t . -��: � � , . . . S OF 5 PeQas ' � �a�e��ine Construct�on Inc. EXISTING BAHIMETRY SHOWN DREDGING TO —6.0 FT MLW BY OTHERS � AREA TO BE DREDGED �_8.0� �o� �p0 � � ,pg_ k .0 O p O '8.0' O L�O' � ^ � � '� t+�� DO 'l � � -7.0' �; � ^' fp• k k �2 0 0'� �11 Pairick Hecker /s/ond Woy Towers Waterline 813—BOB—. WATERLINE�" 4408 Grady Ave. N 223 /s/on d Way, � 1" = zp' 4�' CONSTRUC7lON,�r,c. Tampa FL 33614 C/eo�woter, FL PAGE 5 ❑ _ . � �� ,��:' ' ;�' �� .� _%.,;� - ;�� U �-- _; r" �,; �� , n� ,�.,: r�-- B77 Or.ner ' :; . ' s Pegee I#: 2012149089 BK: 17591 PG: 2282, 05/24/20'12 at 11:02 AM, f:ECQRDING 2 PAGES. $18.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $43757.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OE' CCURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKPRI2 THIS INSTIRUIV�ENT PREE�ARED BY AND RETIDRN TO� Marshall J. Ertaas, Esq. Shutts & Bowen, LLP 200 Ea�t Broward Boulevard, Suite 2'�0� Ft. Lauderdale, Floeida 3�330'! Folio Pdo.: m8-29-1g-0�33�6-000-0060 GE�9E�1� 1dYAR�RlTY �E�D QDearborn T�weos) ,� , `, � �� __ �� _, '- . . . '�' , , , ,' _ .,, . `, � '� �� , , , � , � 1 � � I \ � I i _ - \ � .. / � . / '�. � _ �� , ,� �� __, �, ' � � � �, � , � � . . �, � �, T�IIS INDEN�TURE, made this �� day o� May, 20� 2,�b;y�,THE �;�lY 01= DE=AR�ORN, a Michigan municipal corporation ("Gea�t��") ; v�se ad�r�s� s 1;361 �� Michigan Avenue, De�rborn, AAichigan 4�126 io ISLAi�4D'�l1(RY,�QI�f�'9�S, L.L.C;., a; Lmuisoana limited li�bilifiy comp�ny (Grar�tee"), whos��ddre§�,�s �51 Jo�:r�sto�n Street, PMB #550, Lafayette, LA 70543. _ _ , �, �, , ,- �� WI'f;iVES�'�1'��: , �� ,' �, That Grantor, fc�r and ir�� cvnsldeia�ioa��,of �he sum of T�n Collar� ($10.OU) and other good and va9ua[�le cai�fder��iq�„ to it�en hand paic6 by Gra,nfee, the receipt �nd adequacy wHereof is he�e�y �clZnow��dge�9, has granted, t+argained, ai�d sold to Grantee, �ts ;�uccessors;�n�.�s�igns, all right, title and ir�terest in a,nd tc�, the following described land, situ�Y�an�-�eir►c�Jn Pine99�s C€��n�y, Flori�a, (th� "P�°mpei�j') to-wit: Lots 6, Z,-8�an��9�,UNIT 2 ISLAND ES a�4TES OF CLEAP�W��TEF;, accordjng to �Fi�: Rl��;thereof, �s recordc� in Pl�t Boo� 47, F'a��es 19A ar4d 20, of`�he P"ublic Records of Pi��t�a,s Cour�ty, FSOPBC�a. �` �, ,� • � . T0��9`k�E�R,ia�fih all the tenemenis, h�reditaments, ar�� p��urtenanc:es thereto bel�ori�gir�g_Q��i�l��nywis�: �ppertaining, subject, however, �o: (1) ad val��r�m tax��s for 2012 <and�slabs�qaenx years, not yet due and pay�b9e; (2) zoo�ing ou�din�nces., pravided the s�r��pel'rnit fhe existirig and Grantee's conternpla$ed ufilization of t�+e Pr��pe�ty; ai�d (3) teriaq'ts in.possession of individual units within th� apa�rtenent �orn��l�x I;ocated on the ;�, Prop�r�y pursuant to uurit4en leases, as tenants only. -"� TO HA'VE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee si�nple forever. rAND, the Grantor hereby coden�nts with the Grante�: tha;t i� is la�wfully seized of the �roperty in fee simple; that it has good riyht and lawful �uthc�riiy to sell and convey the Property; that it hereby faally wa�rrants th� title to the ProperQy, ��nd ��rill defend the same agains4 the la,wful claims of a&I persor�s w�orr�soever. IN WITNESS VVHEREOF, fh� Grantor amas executed this ins�r�ame�nt c►n fh� day and year first above wrotten. FTLDOCS 5951098 1 PINE�LAw COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 17591 PG 2283 -, Signed, sea,led and delivered in Yhe presence of �hese wi@nesses: . ��. � � � _ . c�� , - � - �,t 71[�1.�. t �/ � ' 1��/ �/�Wi� ' ' � �i�..i'l.:v �.: � '� �' .—__,�`�1�� iHE CIT� OF C1EAitB�92P�, a 4Ulichigan ---__'. munic�pal corpora�io>n ;--,', � �� ,� , B ,��G� -- �� r6nt me: John B. O'R�aa�l�y, .��', , tle: a�yor � ' ' � ,� ,, -- ,� -, -_ __ �, �"�' �' -- � , �'� � � , ` � �� '� .� �, _ .' , STATE OF MiCHIGAI� ) � 55: COUNTY OF� WAYN�. ) �'�, , � ;` '.;.,; �' , , 51� The fc�regoing insfrument was ac�nau�k�d��f,befor�.Tne this �� Qlay of �lay, 2012, by Jo�n B. O'laeilly, Jr., as 6Viayor_of T�E �C;TY OF �EA�ZBOFtN, a Michigan municipal coirporation, on behalf of the.��rpci�a;fioro:, F��is perso�n�lly� �no��vn to me. ,, � , �� , , ', , � .' �, - -� _ � / ,�l M, �11 /E'�11 ia.-, � [PdOTARIAL SEAL] , ,, ,. =� ' �y ,' -' • , • . �; , `� , , y' � i .'} ` � � � � . . � � i ' i , `,t ` ,/� . � /r� � �,�_� __� � °,�/` �:: 5•;.- _ _ = = ' .*. _ . . ` �' �'+4 `` ' . �, �,� . i .\ � ' i � �_� � i'ran Name: �� Uc,l,c�la v� Notary Public, S�a�e of ich'�� n f�'iy Comrr�lssion Expires: .�- /3 Corrimissuon No. a� ,. , , a �� 71`-. p y..'� �� i+l i��r, r. �,- �� r��, ,� �v� • •� id�ti..,��...iy.. >. .1 t �' �' FTLpOCS 5951098 1 2 CERTIFIED EXCLUSIVELY T0� RRADLEY � hlpl?EAU/ REAL TITLE. I I � I , Ln�r � ° �� 1 ' W (M� 201.64� srvo � I g g1'12'56' W �P� 200•�� .-- ;---- �1 S 8�•10,03, IB'PAL l7'PAL M1. BLOCK WAIL I' ,�d . -r'� l3'�AK 22•PAIM '� ��1 P �� BUAaD COURT � F�p, . .{ , cTYr.� ' �� SHUFFLE Sp• ppcK tl2 �. F� 6, CURO . n ,. R�7p�CT�ON U' a m � cne�e, ' V'P �5• 6 Il01Pl iiarvs� S� ? ° p rL' ^ a �� POOL ➢ECK , I . eox � 'Pq M PCR P..S1Rl nUMPSTER e'�o � �ti > �.6' � I O lOO' H � � � �° � � � — O v � 9 0, P o o � � = �� I ,N `� � LpT -- �� _ o� o � ��/7� � - ' � — I � a ^ ^p�ppL ^ DECK � �/n p !.6' - H �+, � 'CA ��T' .. n n I�° � LK \ I ._ s :' '.:'::11.4'�:.:'�...�� a a _ �0� 1 _ � - .� e � :': GktlUND, FLOOR'::.': �`� / rrOx �j{�' - p- '�� '.'::.':.:'.�....�;'.::'.:'.�.': � = O .° O 'A � 0 . ............ :PAT}0��; S I = � � I : OI PFlLN . . 1 �.Y :'. '.'. � .::'::. :': '�i'. .:....: :'.. y, " z 11 \ j � . -w�q..:: ::':::.�::5'SQ �..::.�::::. ' � 0 Iv�i O CO � � '.".':: L.r�.:..':.� ::•. I > - MN A ... T ; .... .... .... �� 'a ��EIAENT ..14.Y.. • � I � R. ��41� PGS. 19 202 '^.'�:.'.:':.': ::'. �'�TA�� • �� p I O ..'� u:.::•.':::.:�:.:�.,.': wE4. J rp 6. ,� ..tb2'::':.�. � .p \_ __ . _ � --- " _ ._.-. = I ^ I / M1Oq` p '.:': '.': ::.'.':.': :'.' :'.':.': : � .:'.': .'.'.". � .'.'::... .: "0 \ / _ _ _ I %0 :::.� .:::. :::. ::: ::::.�:::::. a I W� \ I / ��':�iiir:�:�i':�i.`i:�:�}r:�:�i�}r:�:�:ii�:�:�r:�:�:�:� I C °� � LI�T � :::::; :::::::: :::::::: i:;:::::: 0 f ..:: ................................. r � �,,, '.':11.l. � .': :.:.: :':. � .': : : . � :. :': :. � :: : . :':. � :. � :::. 0� � - r I 91.2' C� / �r.'.:�: ri.�ri.( � r.:'.i�.ii�.i' i•.i:�ir.i' i�.'r.'ir. � rr :�.r :: r i n� � \ \ ....� :�::::::::.�:::::::.�:::.�:.:�:::::::::.�:::.:::. ° r �^,� \ � F��.:Y.:'.:�.t:�.:t::'.'.:'.'.� :�.Y.�.'.'.7.:'.':.�.�.�.1:':........�; � ,� O ;\ �I / � .....:.:: ::: ::::...;;: :. . .... ....... . f � .. � .: :: :: .:. ::: Z � ;;.s� . . . � \ :o;�:(::;:�:�::':::�. I r m ch � a�.o' � •.:<:: � �I `� � . :.::.:::. . :, :::.: c� � �, ?.:�:;::: :`:::::�:`: _ _---- � \ � j �� z_�,._.t-, •: ,� I � w � _T��r.�:.::. � ................ :. o .n m —a` �: :. � ::. � � :r:::::.��:::: :.: :�. � :•:. � r :.��. o .p � W / -- " _ . :. :. _rr.Ci ii.i rrr. _ ir. - . �„� � ' -- -- :K'..i:�r.�.�.:�ri.i�r.'iii!"'ir:i�':i�.{ir.�r...'�: ..O � � I 1� �.,, �— —� � ............:��:� � � � � ...__ �� ................. �............'...b� � ro r� o:�::::.:�: �.:•:.'.: c, ..................�� "0 � O� \ �I / � .p�t'''t'}'r��•''''''rr��'�.�..�::::::::'::.. .x .i �� .. / � �:�i.i•::�r:.: �:: ,::. �.-o:: ::�.: � ::::::.:t �� I 3 � ��z�.:�r.�.�i.i�. � .i�r.�r.�.i�: i� ................ � .v,: •:.:�:: •:.:�:.� .p, � \ 'y . ...... � ...........:::::. 4 .h � .G.i :�rr .::....:...:.::.:�.� ::�:.�:: r: :t � :. � . � w\, L�� '/ --- .�Z ................ I o� o ::�^.: .: ::.�:. ::. o � pp `.'.'.'.'-`.�.`{(ii�:r:i::::f:(i:?::•r�... . � �, i % � 6� . : :� ,. ; � � :o '� : : ::: : : : ::� :: :::::::::.:::::: ,, „ `"' �. � - --- � :. :::• :::::::::::::::::::::: :::::•:::•:::�::: d _ \ I. � � � A � � � v I pp � �� " _ _ � 6. "I-__-_______ � O I- e• _ - - :. W d � _ ---- ----- --- �. :( .. :... ........ $ .-+ � �1 ............... T � n c� o �'' . . .... :��'e'. I - '+. �� '.'.'.57.7' :':.., :•::::::. � v I lP , :'�:_,...':.'::.:'::..:: ...STPIR':.� . fV O � �,� uv R�+cn �InL � -- ' OI2'PAIM ' :VEIL':. ° ^ o-_ --- - - -I- -I_� �-- ---- � f - ,.. � 'D 31E � _�_. _L_ . . � N � � I �lUlAli�)M Cl�2Pl7RT GPIJCIP N 0 � •. p' � m J � � it,_� p N �, � ,�_.. o �T 6. N d � L _ v �, I� ^ n�uo-nni�w cn?t�t7ar cnNOrr � � pU1L0il� � lIr1E .�Ef? RECTPIC�I Ni> pl8'PALM, � \ 6' CURI1 :IYPJ �� F��/ I 3 QIS•PALM PAIM a�7o7 �' P 2��.�� F N 85' 15' 10" C O '� ^s �;'e, M 201.26' � too, ��.,-ei N 85'17'59° E ( ) i r � � � L L� � J � � � i I�° _�� SECTI�N 8 TOWNSHIP 29 S. RANGE 15 E, JY SCALE� 1'=50' � ►+�" y � � � � y 1 � � A SURVEY OF: i� N LOTS 6-9, UNIT 2 ISLAND ESTATES of CLEARWATER, � AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 47, PAGES 19 & 20, OF v � THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. I ^� � � � , s�P l._ _ — ---- — — —_ ,. - —--——__ — � — �_ _ _ WINDW.�IRD PASSAGE a� _ _____ _ � — — --- �_V��s LAND S�JRV��N�� NV'�'� 7460 BELTREES $TREET UNIT 9 II. OESCRIP710N AS PROVIDED BY CUENT. DUNED � 2. SURVEY WpS PERFORMED 4NTHOUT BENEFIT OF AN ABS7RACT OF 111LE. 3• OTHER iHpN SHOWN ON PLAT THIS FIRM HAS.MADE NO ATTEMPT TO RESEAIiCH INSTRUMENTS OF RECORO REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHiS OF WAY, AND/OR OWNERSHIP THqT MAY EXIST BUT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. 4. NO UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENIS WERE LOCATED. 5. PRINTED �IMENSIONS SHOWN ON DRANING SUPERCEDE SCALED DIMENSIONS. 17EM5 MAY BE DRAWN OUT OF SCALE TO GRAPHICALLY SHOW ENCROACHMENTS ANO/OR OVERIAPS. 6. USE OF 7}IIS SURVEY BY ANYONE 07)1ER THqN 7HOSE CERTIFIED TO WILL BE AT THE 7. UNLESS OIHERWI EI NO ED, ELEVATIONS ARE BASED U ONNAVD 1g88 DATUM. 8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEO, FOUND CORNERS HA4E NO IOENT1F11NG CAP OR OISC. IN, FL 34698 (727 734-3821 F.E.M.A, Zone " AE ", (BFE 11'), Per Ponel #12103 C 0102 G(09-03-03) FCM = FOUND CONCRETE MONl1MENT CONC = CONCRETE FIP = FOUNO IRON PIPE ESM7 = EASEMENT FPP = fOUND PINCH PIPE PP = POWER POLE FIR =�FOUND IRON ROD M� MEASURED FN/D= FOUND NAIL IN O�SK C= CALCULATED SN/D= SET NAIL IN DISK P= PLAT Sla = SET IRON ft00 (1/2") /J8225 '= BEARING BA515 LINE POB = POINT OF BEGINNING F= FlELD (b) = DEED O.R.= OFFICIAL RECOROS PC. = PpGE LP = UGHT POIE PRM = PERMANENT REF�RENCE MONUMENT iYp, = 7WICAL FEMA.= FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANACEMENT AGENCY SURVEY TYPE q, �DATE B�UNDARY=-& IN•� `' `�j�t' 9 ��✓ . � i' �;t,� I�HEREBY CERiIFY THAT SWRVEYREP�{P8�N7E0 MINIMUM REOty{i�,MENLS P'QFIYI iERS'SJ-t7:o5o�:i FLORIDA ADMINISTj�A➢VE i i� � �.» : � s %,� .. �F�''1- A� °° E. �i}�JOWN� FL. ' r,�NO. �`�" .. �'� Li..R6�. �CE�NS�S�o;. 6� 2VEY INVAIJ 1� ll.j� �M� � p�Clc�NS i . �� '�� INV NO 2012=145 )N MEETS iHE I'7:052 OF THE s . �n .� ��' „ ` .��' IN3 DER 48$8 £YOR de MAPPERI 4 u , HYDRAULIC DES9GN II�FORMATION SHEE:T ----- -_ ____ Name: Island Way Towers Dat�: Fe:bru��ry 1�, 2013 Location: 223 I�land Way Sysiem Plo.: Hyd Calc Ar�a #7 Clearwrater, FL Contract No.: K-9m41 Building: Islanc9 Way Towers Drawing INo.: FP9 Contractor: Critical Systern Smlutions Calculated by: WIC1� File Name: Isla�d Way Hydl Stdpi�e7.the Construction: ❑ Combustible ❑� Noncombustible Ceiling H�ight: ft Occupancy: Cl�ss I Stand�ipe AHJ: City of Clearwater SYSTEM �ESIGIV � = [� fVFPA 13: ❑ Light Hazard ❑ Ordinary Hazard Group: ❑ Extra Hazard Gro!ap: Figure: Curve: � Other (Specify): Class I Stao7dpipe ❑ Specific Rulling: Made By: Date: Area of Sprinkler Operation: sqft System Type: � Wet [] Dry ❑ Deluge ❑ Pre-Action Density: gpm/sqft Area per Sprinkler: sqft SPRIP�KLER or NOZZLE Hose Allowance Inside: a50 gpm Make: Mode : Hose Allowance Outside: gpm Size: in K��factor: Rack Sprinkler Allowance: gpm Temperature Rating: °F� CALC�JLP��'EO�R S�dVIfV�ARY �� = Flow Required: 250.00 gpm Pressure Required: ��6.�� psi At: 'C" Factor Used: Overhead: '920 Underground: 1�� V1/A°f E R S�9 P B� LY �1/ATER FLOW TEST PUMP DATA Date: Rated Capacity: rime: At: 3tatic: psi Elevation: �esidual: psi =lowing: gpm =levation: ft _ocation: Pa�rv9p Room 3ource of Information: Anna�al �ir� Paarrap test TABVK OR RESERVOIR 5�0 gpm Capacity: gals 141 �si Elevation: ft �ft WELL Proof Flow: gpm COfVii1�ODITY SiORAGE �ommodity: Class: �ocation: 3torage Height: Area: Aisle Width: 3forage Method: Solid Pile: % Palletized: % Rack: %> �ACK STO�AGE = — ] Single Row ❑ Conventional Pallet ❑ Automatic Storage ❑ En�;apsulate�� ] Double Row ❑ Slave Pallet ❑ Solid Shelving ❑ Nonenc:apsulated � Multiple Row ❑ Open =LUE SPACING _ongitudinal: in Tra�isverse -lorizontal Barriers Provided: CLEARAP�CE FR�M TOP OF STORAGE TO CEILIfVG in ft ir� File: I�land Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Page 1 of 2 Begin End Flow Diameter Type Fittings C-Value Length Eqv Length Ttl Length 1=ric Luss Ttl FL Elev Loss V�locity Node Node gpm inches feet feet feet p:>i/ft psi psi ft/s -H1--H2-0:D�0�7-4-CP-2E----- H2 - M1 0.00 0.874 CP T H3 - 1 0.00 0.874 CP 2E H4 - 1 0.00 0.874 CP E 1 - M2 0.00 0.874 CP T M1 > M5 1.52 1.598 CP 19T M5 > M6 1.52 1.682 10 E,CV,BV M6 > S1 1.52 2.469 40 T S5 < F2 250.00 6.065 40 3T,2T,2EE,2E F1 - F2 0.00 The Pump in the preceding pipe accounts for a pressure increase of: M1 < M2 1.52 1.598 CP 2T M2 < M3 1.52 1.598 CP 17T M3 < M4 1.52 1.682 10 E,CV,BV M4 < S3 1.52 2.469 40 T S3 < S5 8.91 6.065 40 5T,E S1 < S5 241.09 6.065 40 T H5 - H6 0.00 0.874 CP 2E H6 - M13 0.00 0.874 CP T H7 - 2 0.00 0.874 CF' 2E H8 - 2 0.00 0.874 CF E 2 - M14 0.00 0.874 CP T M13 < M14 5.06 1.598 CP 2T M14 < M15 5.06 1.598 CP 17T M15 < M16 5.06 1.610 40 E,CV,BV M16 < S7 5.06 2.469 40 T S7 < S4 5.06 2.469 40 T 28 < M13 5.06 1.598 CP 9T 28 > M8 5.06 1.598 CP 10T M8 > M7 5.06 1.610 40 E,CV,BV M7 > S6 5.06 2.469 40 T S6 < S2 244.94 4.026 40 T S2 < S1 242.61 6.065 40 T S4 < S3 7.39 6.065 40 T H 10 - H 11 0.00 1.049 40 E H11 - M12 0.00 1.049 40 T H9 - M12 0.00 1.049 40 E H12 - M11 0.00 1.049 40 E H13 - 3 0.00 1.049 40 H14 - 4 0.00 1.049 40 3 - 4 0.00 1.049 40 E 4 - M11 0.00 1.049 40 T H 15 - M 10 0.00 1.049 40 E H16 - 5 0.00 1.049 40 H 17 - 6 0.00 1.049 40 5 - 6 0.00 1.049 40 E 6 - H 18 0.00 1.049 40 T N18 - M10 0.00 1.380 40 T H 19 - 7 0.00 1.049 40 H20 - 8 0.00 1.049 4U 7 - 8 0.00 1.049 40 E 8 - 9 0.00 1.049 40 T 9 - M9 0.00 1.380 40 T M12 - M11 0.00 1.610 40 Cr M11 - M10 0.00 1.610 40 Cr M10 - M9 0.00 1.610 40 Cr M9 - M8 0.00 1.610 40 T 2.1 - 23 0.00 0.874 CP 2E 22 - 23 0.00 0.874 CP E 24 - 25 0.00 0.874 CP E -120" 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 4:250- - __2.-0 . . -60-0:60 �ZfO 0.00 7.750 4.000 11.750 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.410 2.000 6.410 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.750 1.000 3.750 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.580 4.000 11.580 0.(100 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.750 152.000 250.750 0.(100 0.04 0.00 0.24 2.660 23.512 26.170 0.(100 0.00 0.00 0.22 17.000 12.000 29.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.10 43.000 192.000 235.000 0.(103 0.64 3.90 2.78 0.00 psi. 120 16.580 120 87.660 120 2.330 120 17.500 120 170.000 120 2.000 120 4.250 120 7.750 120 4.416 120 2.750 120 7.580 120 16.580 120 87.660 120 2.330 120 17.500 120 10.000 120 55.000 120 44.000 120 2.660 120 17.000 120 10.000 120 2.000 120 2.000 120 15.000 120 7.333 120 7.666 120 4.333 120 2.000 120 2.000 120 12.500 120 9.416 120 4.333 120 2.000 120 2.000 120 10.250 120 7.416 120 4.820 120 2.000 120 2.000 120 12.333 120 8.250 120 2.000 120 10.333 120 8.333 120 9.750 120 6.000 120 1.000 120 3.000 120 2.000 16.000 136.000 23.512 12.000 164.000 30.000 2.000 4.000 2.000 1.000 4.000 16.000 136.000 19.000 12.000 12.000 72.000 80.000 19.000 12.000 20.00D 30.000 30.000 2.000 5.000 2.00D 2.000 0.000 0.000 2.000 5.00D 2.000 o.000 0.000 2.000 5.000 6.000 0.000 0.000 2.000 5.000 6.000 B.00D 8.000 8.000 8.000 2.000 1.000 1.000 32.580 223.660 25.840 29.500 334.000 32.000 6.250 11.750 6.420 3.750 11.580 32.580 223.660 21.330 29.500 22.000 127.000 124.000 21.660 29.�00 30.000 32.000 32.000 17.000 12.330 9.570 6.330 2.000 2.000 14.500 14.420 6.330 z.000 2.000 12.250 12.420 10.t320 2.000 2.�)00 14.330 13.?50 8.000 18.:i30 16.;330 17.750 14.000 3.U00 4.U00 3.000 O.G00 0.(100 0.000 0.000 O.U00 0.003 O.U00 o.noo 0.000 0.000 O.C�00 0.001 0.001 0.001 O.G00 0.000 O.G01 O.0 01 O.001 0. G00 0.019 O.0O3 O.000 0.G00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0�0 0.000 0.000 0.0�0 O.OJO OA�70 0.000 0.0�)0 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.29 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.16 0.03 0.00 0.58 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -4.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -4.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.10 0.10 2.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.80 0.34 0.34 0.81 0.81 0.80 0.34 6.17 2.69 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.�0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 )8/26/13 "TI-IE" Sprinkler Program 2001 File: ISland Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Page 2 of 2 Begin End Flow Diameter Type Fittings C-Value Length Eqv Length Ttl Length , ric Loss Ttl FL Elev Loss V,locity Node Node gpm inches feet feet feet psi/ft psi psi ft/s -Z - . . T4 __. 23 - 25 0.00 O.i374 CP T 25 - 27 0.00 1.101 CP T 27 - 28 0.00 1.101 CP T H25 - H26 0.00 0.874 CP 2E H26 - M27 0.00 0.874 CP T H27 - 10 0.00 0.874 CP 2E H28 - 10 0.00 0.874 CP E 10 - M30 0.00 0.874 CP T M27 > M28 2.33 1.598 CP 17T M28 > M29 2.33 2.067 40 E,CV,BV M29 > S10 2.33 2.469 40 T S10 > S2 2.33 6.065 40 E,5T M27 < M30 2.33 1.598 CP T M30 < M31 2.33 1.598 CP 19T M31 < M32 2.33 2.067 40 E,CV,BV M32 < S11 2.33 2.469 40 T S9 < S4 2.33 6.065 40 E,5T S13 - S11 0.00 6.065 40 E S12 - S8 0.00 6.065 40 E SS - S10 0.00 6.065 40 T S11 < S9 2.33 6.065 40 T HV < 102 250.00 4.026 40 E 102 < 101 250.00 4.026 40 E,T 101 < S6 250.00 4.026 40 4E 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 6.-000 4.000 6.000 7.000 4.250 7.750 4.416 2.750 7.580 87.660 2.330 17.500 50.000 10.000 98.750 2.660 17.000 50.000 4.000 4.000 10.000 10.000 4.000 233.000 100.000 _ 1 �06�7�IID�:i . .60 0.00 4.000 8.000 O.U00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.000 11.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.000 12.000 0.1100 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.000 6.250 O.U00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.000 11.750 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.000 6.420 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.000 3.750 O.Q00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.000 11.580 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 136.000 223.660 0.000 0.07 0.00 0.37 22.000 24.330 O.U00 0.00 0.00 0.22 12.000 29.500 O.U00 0.00 0.00 0.16 164.000 214.000 0.(100 0.00 -21.67 0.03 8.000 18.000 0.(i00 0.01 0.00 0.37 152.000 250.750 0.(100 0.08 0.00 0.37 22.000 24.660 0.(i00 0.00 0.00 0.22 12.000 29.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.16 164.000 214:000 0.(i00 0.00 26.00 0.03 14.000 18.000 0.(+00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.000 18.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.000 40.000 O.U00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.000 40.000 0.�00 0.00 -4.33 0.03 10.000 14.000 0.020 0.28 1.73 6.30 30.000 263.000 O.C•20 5.24 0.00 6.30 40.000 140.�00 O.G20 2.79 -4.77 6.30 8/26/13 . "THE" Sprinkler Program .2001 File: Island W�y Hyd Stdpipe7.the Node Pressure Flow Hose Elevation K-factor Area Density psi gpm gpm feet gpm/(psi)YZ sqft gpm/sqft -t�� ror.o7-u-oo .-000_ _ H2 102.07 0.00 19.000 H3 102.07 Q.00 19.000 H4 102.07 0.00 19.000 H5 106.07 U.00 9.000 H6 106.07 U.00 9.000 H7 106.11 0.0� 9.000 H8 106.11 0.00 9.000 H9 105.30 U.O� 10.000 H 10 105.30 U.00 10.000 H 11 105.30 0.00 10.000 H12 105.30 Q00 10.000 H 13 105.74 0.00 9.000 H 14 105.74 0.00 9.000 H 15 105.30 0.00 10.000 H 16 105.74 0.00 9.000 H 17 105.74 0.00 9.000 H 18 105.30 0.00 10.000 H 19 105.74 0.00 9.000 H20 105.74 0.00 9.000 H25 80.35 0.00 69.000 H26 80.35 U.00 69.000 H27 80.36 0.00 69.000 H28 80.36 D.00 69.000 M 1 101.63 D.00 20.000 M2 101.64 0.00 20.000 M3 101.67 U.00 20.000 M4 101.67 0.00 20.000 M5 101.60 0.00 20.000 M6 101.59 0.00 20.000 M7 105.27 (1.00 10.000 M8 105.30 0.00 10.000 M9 105.30 (1.00 10.000 M 10 105.30 0.00 10.000 M11 105.30 0.00 10.000 M 12 105.30 0.00 10.000 M 13 105.63 0.00 10.000 M14 105.68 0.00 10.000 M 15 105.97 C+.00 10.000 M 16 106.00 0.00 10.000 M27 79.92 0�.00 70.000 M28 79.85 Q.00 70.000 M29 79.85 0.00 70.000 M30 79.92 0.00 70.000 M31 80.00 0.00 70.000 M32 80.00 0.00 70.000 S1 101.59 0.00 20.000 S2 101.51 0.00 20.000 S3 101.67 0.00 20.000 Page 1 of 2 8/26/13 "THE" Sprinkter Program :'.001 File: Island Way Hyd Stdpipe7.ihe Node Pressure Flow Hose Elevation K-factor Area Density psi gpm gpm feet gpm/(psi)'/z sqft gpm/sqft -S�4 1-01�7--0-00 - S5 101.67 0.00 S6 105.27 0.00 S7 106.00 0.0� S8 75.51 0.00 S9 75.67 U.00 S10 79.85 0.00 S11 80.01 O.O�J S12 74.21 0.00 S13 74.37 G.00 F1 106.21 0.00 F2 106.21 250.00 1 101.64 0.00 2 105.68 '0.0� 3 105.30 0.00 4 105.30 0.00 5 105.30 0.00 6 105.30 0.00 7 105.30 0.00 8 105.30 0.00 9 105.30 0.00 10 79.92 0.00 21 105.47 0.00 22 105.90 0.00 23 105.47 0.00 24 105.90 0.00 25 105.47 0.00 26 105.90 0.00 27 105.47 0.00 28 105.47 0.00 HV 100.00 250.00 250.00 101 107.25 0.00 102 102.01 0.00 20.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 80.000 80.000 70.000 70.000 83.000 83.000 11.000 11.000 20.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 70.000 10.000 9.000 10.000 9.000 10.000 9.000 10.000 10.000 3.000 -1.000 -1.000 Source Page 2 of 2 18/26/13 "TFIE" Sprinkler Program 2001 File: Island Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Page 1 of 8 Node Node Flow K-factor Elevation Pressure Diameter Length Fric Loss Node Node Flow K-factor Elevation Pressure HWC Fittings Eq�✓ Length Elev Loss Pipe Flow --_-_-.-------_ _ _ _ Velocity _ -_-_ _T_i`LLetigth-__ __T_tl_EL___ _ _ _. H 1 0.00 19.00 102.07 0.874 4.250 0.000 H2 O.00 19.00 102.07 120 2E 2.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.250 0.00 H2 O.00 19.00 102.07 0.874 7.750 0.000 M 1 0.00 20.00 101.63 120 T 4.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.750 0.00 H3 0.00 19.00 102.07 0.874 4.410 0.000 1 0.00 20.00 101.64 120 2E 2.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.410 0.00 H4 0.00 19.00 102.07 0.874 2.750 0.000 1 0.00 20.00 101.64 120 E 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.750 0.00 1 0.00 20.00 101.64 0.874 7.580 0.000 M2 0.00 20.00 101.64 12G T 4.000 0.00 0.00 O.OQ 11. �80 0.00 M 1 0.00 20.00 101.63 1.598 98.750 0.000 M5 0.00 20.00 101.60 120 19T 152.000 0.00 1.52 0.2�d ;?50.750 0.04 M5 0.00 20.00 101.60 1.682 2.G60 0.000 M6 0.00 20.00 101.59 120 E,CV;BV 23.512 0.00 1.52 0.22 26.170 0.00 M6 0.00 20.00 101.59 2.469 17.�00 0.000 S1 0.00 20.00 101.59 120 T 12.�00 0.00 1.52 0.10 29.i)00 0.00 S5 0.00 20.00 101.67 6.065 43.I)00 0.003 F2 250.00 Source 11.00 106.21 120 3T,2T,2EE,2E 192.�J00 3.90 250.00 2.78 235.000 0.64 F1 0.00 11.00 106.21 F2 250.00 Source 11.00 106.21 0.00 0.00 at 0.00 Fire Pump M 1 0.00 20.00 101.63 1.598 16.580 0.000 M2 0.00 20.00 101.64 120 2T 16.i)00 0.00 1.52 0.24 32.;i80 0.00 M2 0.00 2�.00 101.64 1.59� 87.660 0.000 M3 0.00 20.00 101.67 120 17T �136.1)00 0.00 1.52 0.24 �!23.Ei60 0.03 i8/26/13 "THE" Sprinkler Program 2001 File: I�land Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Node Node Flow K-factor Elevation Pressure Diameter Length Fric Loss Node Node Flow K-fartor Elevation Pressure HWC Fittings Eqv Length Elev Loss __Pipe Flow- ---_.__. ---___ _______.___ Velocity _ _T_tl..Leugth _TtLFL M3 0.00 20.00 101.67 1.682 2.330 0.000 M4 0.00 20.00 101.67 120 E,CV,BV 23.512 0.00 � 1.52 0.22 25.840 0.00 M4 0.00 20.00 101.67 2.469 17.500 0.000 S3 0.00 20.00 101.67 120 T 12.000 0.00 1.52 0.10 29.500 0.00 S3 0.00 2.0.00 101.67 6.065 170.000 0.000 S5 0.00 20.00 101.67 120 5T,E 164.000 0.00 g.g� 0.10 334.000 0.00 S1 0.00 20.00 101.59 6.065 2.000 0.003 S5 0.00 20.00 101.67 120 T 30.000 0.00 241.09 2.68 32.000 0.08 H5 0.00 9.00 106.07 0.874 4.250 0.000 H6 0.00 9.00 106.07 120 2E 2.000 0.00 0.00 O.On 6.250 0.00 H6 0.00 9.00 106.07 0.87� 7.750 0.000 M 13 0.00 10.00 105.63 120 T 4.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.750 0.00 H7 0.00 9.00 106.11 0.874 4.416 0.000 2 0.00 10.00 105.68 120 2E 2.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.420 0.00 H8 0.00 9.00 106.11 0.874 2.750 0.000 2 0.00 10.00 105.68 120 E 1.000 0.00 0.00 O.Oa 3.750 0.00 2 0.00 10.00 105.68 0.87�s 7.580 0.000 M 14 0.00 10.00 105.68 120 T 4.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.580 0.00 M13 0.00 10.00 105.63 1.598 16.580 0.001 M 14 0.00 10.00 105.68 120 2T 16.000 0.00 5.06 0.89 32.580 0.04 M 14 0.00 10.00 105.68 1.598 87.360 0.001 M 15 0.00 10.00 105.97 120 17T 136.000 0.00 5.06 0.81 :?23.�i60 0.29 M 15 0.00 10.00 105.97 1.610 2. 330 0.001 M 16 0.00 10.00 106.00 120 E, CV, BV 19.000 0.00 5.06 0.80 21.330 0.03 Page 2 of 8 i8/26/13 "TI-IE" Sprinkler Program 2001 File: Island Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Page 3 of 8 Node IVode Flow K-fac:tor Elevation Pressure Diameter Length Fric Loss Node IVode Flow K-factor Elevation Pressure HWC Fittings Eq�i Lerigth Elev Loss Pipe Flow__ _ _ _ .___ _ _ _ Velocity _ _ Ti:l_Lecigth T_tl_FL - M 16 0.00 10.00 106.00 2.469 17.500 0.000 S7 0.00 10.00 106.00 12Q T 12.000 0.00 5.06 0.34 29.500 0.00 S7 0.00 10.00 106.00 2.469 10. �00 0.000 S4 0.00 20.00 101.67 120 T 12.000 -4.33 5.06 0.34 22.�700 0.00 28 0.00 10.00 105.47 1.598 55.000 0.001 M13 0.00 10.00 105.63 120 9T 72.�00 0.00 5.06 0.81 127.�)00 0.17 28 0.00 10.00 105.47 1.598 44.�)00 0.001 M8 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 10T 80. �00 0.00 5.06 0.81 124.000 0.16 M8 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.61 Q 2.Ii60 0.001 M7 0.00 10.00 105.27 120 E,CV,BV 19.�]00 0.00 5.06 0.80 21.fi60 0.03 M7 0.00 10.00 105.27 2.469 17.1)00 0.000 S6 0.00 10.00 105.27 120 T 12.�)00 0.00 5.06 0.34 29.U00 0.00 S6 0.00 10.00 105.27 4.026 10.p00 0.019 S2 0.00 20.00 101.51 12Q T 20.1)00 -4.33 244.94 6.17 30.U00 0.58 S2 0.00 20.00 101.51 6.065 2.000 0.003 S1 0.00 2i�.00 101.59 120 T 30.000 0.00 242.61 2.69 32.(100 0.08 S4 0.00 20.00 101.67 6.065 2.000 0.000 S3 0.00 20.00 101.67 120 l" 30.U00 0.00 7.39 0.08 32.(100 0.00 H10 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.049 15.(�00 0.000 H11 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 E 2.(100 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.Ca00 0.00 H 11 0. 00 10. 00 105.30 1.049 7. � 33 0.000 M12 0.00 �0.00 105.30 120 T 5.U00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.?30 0.00 H9 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.049 7.666 0.000 M12 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 E 2.C+00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.670 0.00 g/26/13 "TH�=' Sprinkler Program �:001 File: Island Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Page �� of 8 Node Node Flow K-factor Elevation Pressure Diameter Lerigth Fric Loss Node Node Flow K-factor Elevation Pressure HWC Fittings Eqv Lerigth Elev Loss Pipe Flow ___ _____.. _ Velocity TtI Length TtI..FL H 12 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.049 4.333 0.000 M11 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 E 2.D00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.330 0.00 H13 0.00 9.00 105.74 1.049 2.f)00 0.000 3 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.�)00 0.00 H14 0.00 9.00 105.74 1.049 2.�)00 0.000 4 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 0. �00 0.00 0.00 O.OQ 2.000 0.00 3 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.049 12.:i00 0.000 4 0.00 10.00 105.30 12Q E 2. �00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.;i00 0.00 4 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.04� 9.��16 0.000 M11 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 T 5.�)00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.420 0.00 H 15 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.049 4.:333 0.000 M10 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 E 2.�)00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.:330 0.00 H 16 0.00 9.00 105.74 1.049 2.1)00 0.000 5 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.1)00 0.00 H17 0.00 9.00 105.74 1.049 2.1)00 0.000 6 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 O.i)00 0.00 0.00 O.Op 2.l)00 0.00 5 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.049 10.?50 0.000 6 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 E 2.i)00 0.00 0.00 O.OQ 12250 0.00 6 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.049 7.�G16 0.000 H18 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 T 5.I)00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.��20 0.00 N18 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.380 4.�320 0.000 M10 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 T 6.1)00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.E320 0.00 H 19 0.00 9.00 105.74 1.049 2.000 0.000 7 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.U00 0.00 8/26/13 "THE" Sprinkler Program :?001 File: I�land Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Page 5 of 8 Node Node Flow K-factor Elevation Pressure Diameter Length Fric Loss Node fVode Fiow K-factor Elevation Pressure HWC Fittings Eqv Length Elev Loss Pipe Flow Velocity Ttl Length Ttl FL H20 0.00 9.00 105.74 1.049 2.000 0.000 8 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 000 0.00 7 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.049 12.333 0.000 8 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 E 2.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 14 330 0.00 8 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.049 8.250 0.000 9 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 T 5.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.250 0.00 9 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.380 2.000 0.000 M9 0.00 '10.00 105.30 120 T 6.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.000 0.00 M 12 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.610 10.333 0.000 M11 0.00 '10.00 105.30 120 Cr 8.000 0.00 0.00 O.OQ 18.330 0.00 M11 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.610 8.333 0.000 M10 0.00 10.00 105.30 12U Cr 8 000 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 16.330 0.00 M10 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.610 9.750 0.000 M9 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 Cr 8 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.750 0.00 M9 0.00 10.00 105.30 1.610 6.000 0.000 M8 0.00 10.00 105.30 120 T 8.000 0.00 0.00 O.OU 14.000 0.00 21 0.00 10.00 105.47 0.87� 1.000 0.000 23 0.00 10.00 105.47 12Q 2E 2.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.000 0.00 22 0.00 9.00 105.90 0.874 3.000 0.000 23 0.00 10.00 105.47 120 E 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.000 0.00 24 0.00 9.00 105.90 0.874 2.000 0.000 25 0.00 10.00 105.47 120 E 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.000 0.00 26 0.00 9.00 105.90 0.874 6.D00 0.000 27 0.00 10.00 105.47 12Q E 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.�00 0.00 �8/26/13 "THE" Sprinkler Program 2001 File: Island W�y Hyd Stdpipe7.the Node Node Flow K-factor Elevation Pressure Diameter Length Fric Loss Node Node Flow K-factor Elevation Pressure HWC Fittings Eq�� Length Elev Loss Pipe Flow Velocity Ti:l Lerigth Ttl FL 23 0.00 10.00 105.47 0.874 4.000 0.000 25 0.00 10.00 105.47 120 T 4.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.000 0.00 25 0.00 10.00 105.47 1.101 6.000 0.000 27 0.00 '10.00 105.47 120 T 5.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.000 0.00 27 0.00 10.00 105.47 1.101 7.000 0.000 28 0.00 �10.00 105.47 120 T 5.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.000 0.00 H25 0.00 69.00 80.35 0.874 4.250 0.000 H26 0.00 69.00 80.35 120 2E 2.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.250 0.00 H26 0.00 69.00 80.35 0.874 7.750 0.000 M27 0.00 70.00 79.92 120 T 4.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.750 0.00 H27 0.00 69.00 80.36 0.874 4.�16 0.000 10 0.00 70.00 79.92 120 2E 2.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 6. �20 0.00 H28 0.00 69.00 80.36 0.874 2.750 0.000 10 0.00 70.00 79.92 120 E 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.750 0.00 10 0.00 70.00 79.92 0.874 7.580 0.000 M30 0.00 70.00 79.92 12U T 4.000 0.00 0.00 O.OQ 11. �80 0.00 M27 0.00 70.00 79.92 1.59� 87.e60 0.000 M28 0.00 70.00 79.85 120 17T 136.000 0.00 2.33 0.37 123.G60 0.07 M28 0.00 70.00 79.85 2.06I 2.330 0.000 M29 0.00 70.00 79.85 120 E,CV,BV 22.J00 0.00 2.33 0.22 24.330 0.00 M29 0.00 70.00 79.85 2.469 17. �00 0.000 S 10 0.00 70.00 79.85 120 T 12. D00 0.00 2.33 0.16 29.500 0.00 S10 0.00 70.00 79.85 6.065 50.000 0.000 S2 0.00 20.00 101.51 120 E,5T '164.�00 -21.67 2.33 0.03 �' 14.000 0.00 Page � of 8 8/26/13 "TFIE" Sprinkler Program 2001 File: I�land Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Page 7 of 8 Node Node Flow K-factor Elevation Pressure Diameter Le�ngth Fric Loss Node Node Flow K-factor Elevation Pressure HWC Fittings Eqv Le��gth Elev Loss Pipe Flow Velocity Ttl Length Ttl FL M27 0.00 �0.00 79.92 1.598 10 000 0.000 M30 0.00 70.00 79.92 120 T 8 000 0.00 2.33 0.37 18.000 0.01 M30 0.00 70.00 79.92 1.598 98.750 0.000 M31 0.00 70.00 80.00 120 19T 152.000 0.00 2.33 0.37 250.750 0.08 M31 0.00 70.00 80.00 2.067 2.660 0.000 M32 0.00 70.00 80.00 120 E,CV,BV 22 000 0.00 2.33 0.22 24.660 0.00 M32 0.00 70.00 80.00 2.469 17.000 0.000 S11 0.00 70.00 80.01 120 T 12.000 0.00 2.33 0.1 C 29.000 0.00 S9 0.00 �0.00 75.67 6.065 50.000 0.000 S4 0.00 20.00 101.67 120 E,5T 164.000 26.00 2.33 0.03 214.000 0.00 S13 0.00 83.00 74.37 6.065 4.000 0.000 S11 0.00 "10.00 80.01 12U E 14.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.000 0.00 S12 0.00 83.00 74.21 6.065 4.000 0.000 S8 0.00 a0.00 75.51 120 E 14.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.000 0.00 S8 0.00 60.00 75.51 6.065 10.000 0.000 S10 0.00 70.00 79.85 12Q T 30.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.000 0.00 S11 0.00 70.00 80.01 6.065 10.000 0.000 S9 0.00 80.00 75.67 120 T 30.000 -4.33 2.33 0.03 40.000 0.00 HV 250.00 3.00 100.00 4.026 4.000 0.020 102 0.00 -1.00 102.01 120 E 10.000 1.73 250.00 6.30 14.000 0.28 102 0.00 -1.00 102.01 4.026 ?33.000 0.020 101 0.00 -1.00 107.25 120 E,T 30.000 0.00 250.00 6.30 .?63.000 5.24 101 0.00 -1.00 107.25 4.026 100.D00 0.020 S6 0.00 10.00 105.27 120 4E 40.000 -4.77 250.00 6.30 140. �00 2.79 )8/26/13 "ThIE" Sprinkler Program 2001 File: IsJand Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Node Node Flow K-factor Elevation Pressure Diameter Lerigth Fric Loss Node Node Flow K-factor Elevation Pressure HWC Fittings Eqv Lerigth Elev Loss Pipe Flow Velocity Ttl Lerigth Ttl FL Units Legend Flow = gpm Elevation = feet Pressure = psi Diameter = inches Velucity = ft/sec �.ength, Eqv Length, �Ttl Length = feet Fric Loss = psi/ft Elev Loss, Ttl FL = psi Page �3 of 8 9/26/13 'TH=" Sprinkler Program ��001 File: Island Way Hyd Stdpipe7.tr�e Page 1 of 8 Nozzle Flow Pipe Fittings Pipe Fricrion Type & in Size & Eqiv. Loss Req. Reference Location gpm inches Devices Length psi/ft psi Notes H 1 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 4.250 Pt 102.07 to Q 0.00 120 2E ftg 2.000 O.q00 Pf 0.00 H2 tot 6.250 Pe 0.00 H2 q 0.00 0.874 Igtn 7.750 Pt 102.07 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 4.000 O.U00 Pf 0.00 M 1 tot 11.750 Pe 0.00 H3 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 4.410 Pt 102.07 to Q 0.00 120 2E ftg 2.000 0.(100 Pf 0.00 � tot 6.410 Pe 0.00 H4 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 2.750 Pt 102.07 to Q 0.00 120 E ftg 1.000 O.C�00 Pf 0.00 � tot 3.750 Pe 0.00 1 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 7.580 Pt 101.64 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 4.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 M2 tot 11.580 Pe 0.00 M5 q 0.00 1.598 Igth 98.750 Pt 101.60 to Q 1.52 12019T ftg 152.000 0.000 Pf 0.04 M 1 tot 250.750 Pe 0.00 M6 q 0.00 1.682 Igth 2.660 Pt 101.59 to Q 1.52 120 E,CV,BV ftg 23.512 0.000 Pf 0.00 M5 tot 26.170 Pe 0.00 S1 q 0.00 2.469 Igth 17.000 Pt 101.59 to Q 1.52 120 T ftg 12.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 M6 tot 29.000 Pe 0.00 S5 q 0.00 6.065 Igth 43.000 Pt 101.67 to Q 250.00 120 3T,2T,2EE,2E ftg 192.000 0.0��3 Pf 0.64 F2 Source tot 235.000 Pe 3.90 F1 q 0.00 Igth Pt 106.21 0.00 to Q 0.00 ftg Pf at F2 Source Fire Pump tot Pe 0.00 0.00 M1 to M2 M2 to M3 q 0.00 1.598 Q 1.52 120 2T q 0.00 1.598 Q 1.52 120 17T Igth 16.580 Pt 101.63 ftg 16.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 tot 32.580 Pe 0.00 Igth 87.660 Pt 101.64 ftg 136.00U 0.01)0 Pf 0.03 tot 223.66U Pe 0.00 3/26/13 "THE" Sprinkler Program �:001 rile: Island Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Page :? of 8 Nozzle Flow Pipe Fittings Pipe Friction Type & in Size & Eqiv. L�oss Req. Reference Location gpm inches Devices Length psi/ft psi Notes M3 q 0.00 1.682 Igtln 2.330 Pt 101.67 to Q 1.52 120 E,CV,BV ftg 23.512 O.U00 Pf 0.00 M4 tat 25.840 Pe 0.00 M4 q 0.00 2.469 Igth 17.500 Pt 101.67 to Q 1.52 120 T ftg 12.000 O.U00 Pf 0.00 S3 tot 29.500 Pe 0.00 S3 q 0.00 6.065 Igth 170.OG0 Pt 101.67 to Q 8.91 120 5T, E ftg 164.000 0. (►00 Pf 0.00 S5 tat 334.000 Pe 0.00 S1 q 0.00 6.065 Igth 2.000 Pt 101.59 to Q 241.09 120 T ftg 30.000 O.G03 Pf 0.08 S5 tot 32.000 Pe 0.00 H5 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 4.250 Pt 106.07 to Q 0.00 120 2E ftg 2.000 O.000 Pf 0.00 H6 tot 6.250 Pe 0.00 H6 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 7.750 Pt 106.07 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 4.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 M 13 tot 11.750 Pe 0.00 H7 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 4.41 G Pt 106.11 to Q 0.00 120 2E ftg 2.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 2 tot 6.420 Pe 0.00 H8 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 2.750 Pt 106.11 to Q 0.00 120 E ftg 1.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 2 tot 3.750 Pe 0.00 2 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 7.580 Pt 105.68 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 4.00� O.O�JO Pf 0.00 M14 tot 11.580 Pe 0.00 M13 q 0.00 1.598 Igth 16.58Q Pt 105.63 to Q 5.06 120 2T ftg 16.000 0.0�)1 Pf 0.04 M 14 tot 32. 580 Pe 0.00 M14 q 0.00 1.598 Igth 87.660 Pt 105.68 to Q 5.06 120 17T ftg 136.000 0.01)1 Pf 0.29 M 15 tot 223.660 Pe 0.00 M 15 q 0.00 1.610 Igth 2.330 Pt 105.97 to Q 5.06 120 E,CV,BV ftg 19.000 0.001 Pf 0.03 M16 toi 21.330 Pe 0.00 3/26/13 "THE" Sprinkler Program :'.001 File: I�land Way Hyd Stdpipe7.tr+e Page 3 of 8 Nozzle Flow Pipe Fittings Pipe Friction Type & in Size & Eqiv. Loss Req. Reference Location gpm inches Devices Length psi/ft psi N�te: M 16 q 0.00 2.469 Igth 17.500 Pt 106.00 to Q 5.06 120 T ftg 12.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 S7 tot 29.500 Pe 0.00 S7 q 0.00 2.469 Igth 10.000 Pt 106.00 to Q 5.06 12C T ftg 12.000 0. �00 Pf 0.00 S4 tot 22.OfJ0 Pe -4.33 2g q 0.00 1.598 Igth 55.OU0 Pt 105.47 to Q 5.06 120 9T ftg 72.000 0.�)01 Pf 0.17 M 13 tot 127.000 Pe 0.00 �g q 0.00 1.598 Igth 44.000 Pt 105.30 to Q 5.06 120 10T ftg 80.000 O.i)01 Pf 0.16 28 tot 124.OU0 Pe 0.00 M7 q 0.00 1.610 Igth 2.6F0 Pt 105.27 to Q 5.06 120 E,CV,BV ftg 19.OU0 0.1)01 Pf 0.03 �g tot 21.660 Pe 0.00 S6 q 0.00 2.469 Igth 17.000 Pt 105.27 to Q 5.06 120 T ftg 12.OU0 0.1)00 Pf 0.00 �y7 tot 29.000 Pe 0.00 S6 q 0.00 4.026 Igth 10.000 Pt 105.27 to Q ?_44.94 120 T ftg 20.OU0 O.U19 Pf 0.58 g2 tot 30.000 Pe -4.33 S2 q 0.00 6.065 Igth 2.OU0 Pt 101.51 to Q 242.61 120 T ftg 30.OU0 0.003 Pf 0.08 S1 tot 32.OU0 Pe 0.00 S4 q 0.00 6.065 Igth 2.000 Pt 101.67 to Q 7.39 120 T ftg 30.000 O.U00 Pf 0.00 S3 tot 32.000 Pe 0.00 H10 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 15.000 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 E ftg 2.OU0 O.U00 Pf 0.00 H 11 tot 17.000 Pe 0.00 H11 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 7.333 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 5.00�0 0.(100 Pf 0.00 M 12 tot 12.330 Pe 0.00 H9 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 7.66�6 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 E ftg 2.OG0 O.U00 Pf 0.00 M 12 tot 9.670 Pe 0.00 )8/26/13 "THE" Sprinkler Program 2001 File: Istand Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Page 4 of 8 Nozzle Flow Pipe Fittings Pipe Fric:ion Type & in Size & Eqiv. L��ss Req. Reference Location gpm inches Devices Length p:�i/ft psi Notes H 12 q 0.00 1.049 IgtE� 4.333 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 E ftg 2.000 0.1)00 Pf 0.00 M11 tot 6.330 Pe 0.00 H13 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 2.000 Pt 105.74 to Q 0.00 120 ftg 0.000 O.U00 Pf 0.00 3 tot 2.000 Pe 0.00 H 14 q 0.00 1.049 IgtEi 2.000 Pt 105.74 to Q 0.00 120 ftg O.OUO 0.O00 Pf 0.00 4 tot 2.000 Pe 0.00 3 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 12.500 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 E ftg 2.000 0.(100 Pf 0.00 4 tot 14.500 Pe 0.00 4 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 9.416 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 5.000 0.()00 Pf 0.00 M 11 tot 14.420 Pe 0.00 H 15 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 4.333 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 E ftg 2.OQ0 O.C+00 Pf 0.00 M 10 tot 6.330 Pe 0.00 H16 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 2.000 Pt 105.74 to Q 0.00 120 ftg 0.000 0. C+00 Pf 0.00 5 tot 2.000 Pe 0.00 H17 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 2.000 Pt 105.74 to Q 0.00 120 ftg 0.000 O.G00 Pf 0.00 g tot 2.000 Pe 0.00 5 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 10.250 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 E ftg 2.000 O.G00 Pf 0.00 � tot 12.250 Pe 0.00 6 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 7.416 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 5.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 H18 tot 12.420 Pe 0.00 H 18 q 0.00 1.380 Igth 4.820 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 6.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 M 10 tot 10.820 Pe 0.00 H 19 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 2.000 Pt 105.74 to Q 0.00 120 ftg 0.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 7 tot 2.000 Pe 0.00 8/26/13 "Tf-IE" Sprinkler Program 2001 File: Istand Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Page ;i of 8 iVozzle Flow Pipe Fittings Pipe Fricl:ion Type & in Size & Eqiv. L��ss Req. Reference Location gpm inches Devices Length p;�i/ft psi Notes H20 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 2.000 Pt 105.74 to Q 0.00 120 ftg 0.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 g tot 2.000 Pe 0.00 7 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 12.333 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 E fty 2.000 O.U00 Pf 0.00 g t�t 14.330 Pe 0.00 8 q 0.00 1.049 Igth 8.250 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 5.000 0.(100 Pf 0.00 g tot 13.250 Pe 0.00 g q 0.00 1.380 Igth 2.000 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 6.000 0.(100 Pf 0.00 Mg tot 8.OQ0 Pe 0.00 M12 q 0.00 1.610 Igth 10.333 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 Cr ftg 8.000 O.C�00 Pf 0.00 M11 tot 18.330 Pe 0.00 M 11 q 0.00 1.610 Igth 8.333 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 Cr ftg 8.000 O.G00 Pf 0.00 M 10 tot 16.330 Pe 0.00 M10 q 0.00 1.610 Igth 9.750 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 Cr ftg 8.000 O.000 Pf 0.00 �g tot 17.750 Pe 0.00 M9 q 0.00 1.610 Igth 6.000 Pt 105.30 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 8.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 Mg tot 14.000 Pe 0.00 21 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 1.000 Pt 105.47 to Q 0.00 120 2E ftg 2.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 23 tot 3.000 Pe 0.00 22 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 3.000 Pt 105.90 to Q 0.00 120 E ftg 1.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 23 tot 4.000 Pe 0.00 24 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 2.000 Pt 105.90 to Q 0.00 120 E ftg 1.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 25 tot 3.000 Pe 0.00 26 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 6.000 Pt 105.90 to Q 0.00 120 E ft,y 1.00� 0.000 Pf 0.00 27 tot 7.000 Pe 0.00 8/26/13 "TI-'E" Sprinkler Program �001 rile: Is�and Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Page �5 of 8 Nozzle Flow Pipe Fittings Pipe Fricrion Type & in Size & Eqiv. Loss Req. Reference Location gpm inches Devices Length psi/ft psi Notes 23 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 4.000 Pt 105.47 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 4.000 0.1)00 Pf 0.00 25 tot 8.000 Pe 0.00 25 q 0.00 1.101 Igt� 6.000 Pt 105.47 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 5.000 O.U00 Pf 0.00 27 tot 11.000 Pe 0.00 27 q 0.00 1.101 Igth 7.000 Pt 105.47 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 5.000 0.(100 Pf 0.00 28 tot 12.000 Pe 0.00 H25 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 4.250 Pt 80.35 to Q 0.00 120 2E ftg 2.000 0.(i00 Pf 0.00 H26 tot 6.250 Pe 0.00 H26 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 7.750 Pt 80.35 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 4.000 O.C+00 Pf 0.00 M27 tot 11.750 Pe 0.00 H27 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 4.416 Pt 80.36 to Q 0.00 120 2E ftg 2.000 O. C 00 Pf 0.00 10 tot 6.420 Pe 0.00 H28 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 2.750 Pt 80.36 to Q 0.00 120 E ftg 1.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 10 tot 3.750 Pe 0.00 10 q 0.00 0.874 Igth 7.580 Pt 79.92 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 4.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 M30 tot 11.580 Pe 0.00 M28 q 0.00 1.598 Igth 87.660 Pt 79.85 to Q 2.33 120 17T ftg 136.000 0.000 Pf 0.07 M27 tot 223.660 Pe 0.00 M29 q 0.00 2.067 Igth 2.330 Pt 79.85 to Q 2.33 120 E, CV, BV fty 22.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 M28 tot 24.330 Pe 0.00 �10 q 0.00 2.469 Igth 17.500 Pt 79.85 to Q 2.33 120 T ftg 12.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 M29 tot 29.500 Pe 0.00 S2 q 0.00 6.065 Igth 50.000 Pt 101.51 to Q 2.33 120 E,ST ftg 164.00� 0.0��0 Pf 0.00 S10 tot 214.000 Pe -21.67 6/26/13 "THE" Sprinkler Program ;?001 _File: Island Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Page 7 of 8 Nozzle Flow Pipe Fittings Pipe Fric:tion Type & in Size & Eqiv. L.oss Req. Reference Location gpm inches Devices Length F�si/ft psi Notes M27 q 0.00 1.598 Igth 10.000 Pt 79.92 to Q 2.33 120 T fig 8.000 0.000 Pf 0.01 M30 tot 18.000 Pe 0.00 M30 q 0.00 1.598 Ig`h 98.750 Pt 79.92 to Q 2.33 120 19T f�g 152.000 0.000 Pf 0.08 M31 tut 250.750 Pe 0.00 M31 q 0.00 2.067 Igth 2.660 Pt 80.00 to Q 2.33 120 E, CV, BV ftg 22.000 0. ��00 Pf 0.00 �y32 tot 24.660 Pe 0.00 M32 q 0.00 2.469 Igth 17.000 Pt 80.00 to Q 2.33 120 T ftg 12.000 0.000 Pf 0.00 S11 tot 29.000 Pe 0.00 S9 q 0.00 6.065 Igth 50.OQ0 Pt 75.67 to Q 2.33 120 E,5T ftg 164.000 0.1)00 Pf 0.00 S4 tot 214.OU0 Pe 26.00 S13 q 0.00 6.065 Igth 4.000 Pt 74.37 to Q 0.00 120 E ftg 14.000 0.()00 Pf 0.00 S11 tot 18.000 Pe 0.00 S 12 q 0.00 6.065 Igth 4.000 Pt 74.21 to Q 0.00 120 E ftg 14.000 0.(100 Pf 0.00 gg tot 18.000 Pe 0.00 S8 q 0.00 6.065 Igth 10.000 Pt 75.51 to Q 0.00 120 T ftg 30.000 0.C�00 Pf 0.00 S10 tot 40.000 Pe 0.00 S11 q 0.00 6.065 Igth 10.000 Pt 80.01 to Q 2.33 120 T ftg 30.000 O.C�00 Pf 0.00 S9 tot 40.000 Pe -4.33 HV Hose q 250.00 4.026 Igth 4.000 Pt 100.00 to Q 250.00 120 E ftg 10.000 0.a20 Pf 0.28 102 tot 14.000 Pe 1.73 102 q 0.00 4.026 Igth 233.000 Pt 102.01 to Q 250.00 120 E,T ftg 30.000 0.020 Pf 5.24 101 tot 263.OU0 Pe 0.00 101 q 0.00 4.026 Igth 100.000 Pt 107.25 to Q 250.00 120 4E ftca 40.000 0,020 Pf 2.79 S6 tot 140.000 Pe -4.77 8/26/13 "TN E" Sprinkler Program 2001 File: Island Way Hyd Stdpipe7.the Page 8 of 8 Nozzle Flow Pipe Fittings Pipe Fric:tion Type & in Size � Eqiv. l_oss Req. Reference Location gpm inches Devices Length psi/ft psi fVote,s Qt 'L50.00 Pt 106.21 �8/26/13 "THE" Sprinkler Program 2001 170 - 160 150 140 13u 120 110 100 •�, 90 n � � N 80 a� a` 70 60 50 40 3C 20 10 0 0 i u0 20'v Water Supply vs. Sprinkler Demand 3v0 4uu 5UU 600 700 800 900 Flow (gpm) �ile: island Way Hyd Stdpipe7.ifie WATER SUPPLY INFORMATION: . Static (psi}: 145.00 Residual (psi): 105.00 @ (gpm): 754.00 Hose (gpm): 0.00 System req. (gpm): 250.00 @ (Psi): 106.21 Supply available: 139.81 psi Safety margin: 33.6Q psi Maximum velocity in the system is: Continuity at all nodes satisfied to: Pipe Type Legend CP = Central - BlazeMaster CPVC 10 = Schedule 10 40 = Schedule 40 fVOTES Hydraulic S�mm�ry 6.30 ft/sec in the pipe between Nodes: HV and 102 0.01 gpm Fitting Type Legend E = 90 degree elbow T= Tee - Flow thru branch CV = Swing check valve �V = Butterfly valve EE = 45 degree elbow Cr = Cross (flow tumed 90 degre Page 1 of 1 8/26/13 "THE" Sprinkler Program 2001