The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2013-11038.. p � ��.��t�� MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: CASE: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT January 21, 2014 F.4. FLD2013-11038 STAFF REPORT REQU EST: Flexible Development approval to permit a 314-room overnight accommodation use (including 189 existing units and 75 dwelling units converted to 125 overnight accommodation units previously approved and transferred under FLD2004-04025 and TDR2004-09011) in the Tourist (T) and Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) Districts with a lot area of 4.87 acres (3.908 acres zoned T District and 0.962 acres zoned OS/R District), a lot width of 467 feet, a front (north) setback of 15 feet (to building), zero feet (to entry plaza paving) and three feet (to parking), a side (west) setback of 15 feet (to building) and zero feet (to existing public access sidewalk), a side (east) setback of 10 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing parking and dumpster enclosure), a rear (south) setback of 106 feet (to building), a building height of 99.8 feet above Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to top of roof deck (113 to mid-point of peaked roof screening elevator and other mechanical equipment) and 407 parking spaces at 1.29 parking spaces per hotel room, under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.J; approval of a two- year development order; and to fulfill the shade tree requirement solely with palm and understory trees as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of 3-1202.G. GENERAL DATA: Agent ........................... Michael J. Palmer, Synergy Civil Engineering, Inc. Applicant / Owne►' .. ........... Decade Gulf Coast Hotel Partners, LP and J.K. Gulfview, LLC Location .......................... 521 South Gulfview Boulevard; south side of South Gulfview Boulevard, between Hamden Drive and Bayway Boulevard Property Size .................... 4.87 acres (3.908 acres Tourist District; 0.962 acres Open Space/Recreation District) Futu►'e Land Use Plan...... Resort Facilities High (RFH) and Water Zoning .......................... Tourist (T) District and Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District Special Area Plan .............. Beach by Design (South Beach/Clearwater Pass District) Adjacent Zoning.... North: Tourist (T) District South: Preservation (P) District East West: Existing Land Use......... Tourist (T) District Tourist (T) District Overnight Accommodations (189 units) with associated accessory uses including restaurant, meeting space, ballroom, retail, spa and gym. Proposed Land Use......... Overnight Accommodations (314 units) with associated accessory uses including restaurant, meeting space, ballroom, retail, spa and gym. � 1��(41 T1'ttll.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review ° ,�.�..i��✓.�.i'��^...�„ ...:��p� o�s�r.�...,;,�; . .. . ANALYSIS: Location and Existing Conditions: The 4.87-acre subject property is located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard, between Hamden Drive and Bayway Boulevard with 467 feet of frontage along South Gulf Boulevard and 600 feet of frontage along the Clearwater Pass. The property spans two zoning districts including Tourist (T) and Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) and one Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) classification, Resort Facilities High (RFH). The subject property is also located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design. The portion of the site within the T District is 3.908 acres and landward of an existing seawall. The remainder of the site is submerged land and constitutes 0.962 acres. It should be noted that the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) is shown on the submitted site plan and survey as terminating just west of the west property line. It should also be noted that only the portion of the site within the T District is considered with regard to development potential such as Impervious Surface ratio (ISR), Gross Floor Area (GFA) and density. The property is not oriented due north/south and for the sake of argument the property line along South Gulfview Boulevard will be referred to in this report as the north property line, the waterfront side as south and the other two sides as east and west. The immediate area is characterized by a variety of uses including overnight accommodation, retail, outdoor recreation and entertainment, restaurant and attached dwelling uses. The 440 and 450 West attached dwelling condominiums towers are located to the west of the subject property and are 157 feet in height (each tower). Shephard's is located to the east of the site. The City's Beach Walk project has been constructed transforming South Gulfview Boulevard to the north of this site into a winding beachside promenade with lush PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIV[SION ; � — — : � , . I ' � � ,r � f � � „ , - � i . 1 3 � . _ �' �' ".__- _ � I i�G � [��.� ''. ; _' M7WATER D72 .. _ _. __— s` a ��1� � �IFfH9T._ _. _ � \ � .� �; � � ,� , i ; � : q: �------ ---_ __ _" ,: , ;: �; O `2 -- ; o �� Bpy51DE DR '� ~ � � . ' _ . ... PROJECT (� s�� .. .. -- - _.,.d'9YK;AYg(Vp��_;__��. � _.. , , _. _ � ., ..., �. , , ; .___- -- _,, s��.., . ,� �, �_ ' _ _ .�_ &�_._ r � � , , _. l� �__ -- _. . .__ ��q�� '� �A .r; .71' . , '��rs ��l LOCATION MAP ' "�� Q �'d�� ..: �� n O / ��_J . as ,�'��! • � � -. � � �� . � � 6 , � C' I•�" r--� r� 1 L_J �� 9� � °- EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 1 ` Y C�ea� 1`t�ll.� Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT p PP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION � �1-._,-.�._,.-._,_.� ., � �� . �a ��a=�� . �.� - � �� , - landscaping, artistic touches and clear views to Clearwater's award-winning beach and the water beyond. The property is used as a 189-unit overnight accommodation use and has a valid Business Tax Receipt (BTR-0024076). The hotel units are located within two buildings ranging between seven and nine stories. These two buildings are located on the eastern two-thirds of the site. A 6,144 square-foot two story conference center is located at the southeast corner of the site. Parking is provided via a mix of surface parking and structured, under-building parking. A swimming pool and patio is located to the south of the western building. A landscape buffer approximately three feet in width is provided along the north property line adjacent to South Gulfview Boulevard. A public access easement with sidewalk runs along the west side of the site. Access to the site is provided from South Gulfview Boulevard via three two-way driveways with one centrally located and one each at the northeast and northwest corners of the site. Site History: ➢ On January 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved, with 14 conditions, Case Nos. FLD2004-04025/TDR2004-09011 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 289-room/unit hotel (where 156 rooms/units were permitted at that time); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (241-room/unit overnight accommodation use [including accessory restaurant, retail sales and wave runner business], 38 attached dwellings, a restaurant and an office use) with reductions to setbacks, an increase to building height and to permit direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights for two dwelling units from 850 Bayway Boulevard. ➢ On December 28, 2005, the Community Development Coordinator approved a minor amendment to the approved site plan including a revised roof plan and architectural detailing, modifications to the building elevations, re-routing of a sidewalk, modification to foundation landscaping and the elimination of a second story covered walkway. ➢ On April 5, 2006, the Community Development Coordinator approved a minor amendment to the approved site plan which converted 52 hotel units to 39 residential units where the requisite number of parking spaces would be provided. ➢ On May 15, 2007, the CDB approved with four conditions Case No. FLD2007-03008 to permit the addition of a 6,144 square-foot conference center as an accessory use to an existing hotel as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the (then) provisions of Section 2-803.C. All required time frames set for each of the above site plan approvals have been met and are considered vested. It is important to note that the Termination of Status of Nonconformity (TSN) request for density and the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) run with the land irrespective of the status of any associated site plan approvals. It should be noted that no residential units were physically established on the property. Community Development Board — January 2 l, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 2 �C�Q�� tl' al�l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT \N�,�. P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION u�✓.�.�.,r��.�,,.-�,,.�`;�°�.'1� ��:�°.s;�c .. . . . To summarize, in 2005 a Termination of Status of Nonconformity with regard to density (289 hotel units) was approved. That application also included a request to convert 48 hotel units to 36 dwelling units. The conversion rate of hotel units to dwelling units, at the time, was 0.75 residential units per one hotel unit based on a density of 40 hotel and 30 dwelling units per acre (30 divided by 40). In 2006 a minor amendment was approved which converted an additiona152 hotel units to 39 dwelling units at the aforementioned conversion rate which brought the total number of hotel units converted to dwelling units to 100 (48 plus 52). These 100 hotel units converted, at the time, to 75 dwelling units (100 times 0.75). Since 2006 the permitted density for hotel units increased from 40 units per acre to 50 while the density for dwelling units remained the same. That means that the conversion rate of dwelling unit to hotel unit increased from 1.33 dwelling units per hotel unit (40 divided by 30) to 1.67 (50 divided by 30). The applicant is now converting those 75 dwelling units to 125 hotel units (75 times 1.67). The tables below show how these conversions took place. 'YOrigir��l'p��si�ty. C��iit�jacy � � �' � Cur�en�,.,�1��'�it�(ur�i�s%acj, i Conversion Conversion Conversion Hotel Dwelling Hotel unit to DU to Hotel Dwetling Hotel unit to Conversion DU Hotel Dwelling DU to Hotel Unit 40 30 0.75 1.33 50 30 0.6 1.67 „ � . � . . s.. . �- �, , 2005�Conversibn� 200�>�on'version : =Totial';U'nits Total Hotel Hotel Conversion p� Hotel Conversion DU Units Total DU Units Rate Units Rate Converted Created 48 X 0.75 = 36 52 X 0.75 = 39 100 75 � 201�a or�v��rs.ia�n Total DU Created in Conversion Hotel 2005 and 2006 Rate Units 75 X 1.67 = 125 Development Proposal: The proposal is to construct a new hotel building on the property bringing the total number of overnight accommodation units to 314. The three existing buildings including the pool area will remain untouched with their compliment of existing hotel units and variety of accessory uses consistent with application FLD2004-04025 including convention center, support offices, restaurant, retail sales and service and a wave runner business. The primary change to the site will be the addition of a 10-story building 99.8 feet in height, displacing the existing parking lot located on the western half of the site. The result will be that nearly all required parking will be located under or within the proposed and existing buildings. Setbacks are consistent with a Level One Flexible Standard Development review with front (north) setbacks of 15 feet (to building), zero feet (to entry plaza paving) and three feet (to parking), side (west) setbacks of 15 feet (to building) and zero feet (to existing public access Community Development Board — January 2l , 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 3 ° p �.+�T } {. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT � C l.�`i �1' �l�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � ��.�.�.. �_ns.�,. , .,��,��^... � .. .� sidewalk), side (east) setbacks of 10 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing parking and dumpster enclosure) and a rear (south) setback of 106 feet (to building). The request includes flexibility from the CDC to permit a height of 99.8 feet where 50 feet would otherwise be permitted as part of a Level I Flexible Standard application. The proposal maintains the three existing two-way driveways. The proposal also includes eliminating the provision of canopy trees on site and fulfilling this requirement through the provision of palm and understory trees as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program. The site will include extensive landscaping along the north, east and west sides of the site as well as along the waterfront through the provision of a variety of plant material including specimen medjool date palms, silver buttonwood, foxtail palms, oleander, bird of paradise and ixora. The following provides the use of space within the proposed building by level: Level 1 Parkin 50 s aces; com letel within the buildin Trash com actor -- Retail 4,660 s uare feet Elevator Lobb , bike stora e, service uses -- Leve12 Parkin 73 s aces; com letel within the buildin Elevator Lobb , service uses -- Guest rooms seven units Leve13 Parkin 81 s aces; com letel within the buildin Elevator Lobb , service uses -- Guest rooms seven units Level 4 Parkin 81 s aces; com letel within the buildin Elevator Lobb , service uses -- Guest rooms seven units Leve15 Parkin 61 s aces; com letel within the buildin Elevator Lobb , laund facilities, service uses -- Guest rooms seven units Level 6 Guest rooms three units Gift Sho 450 s uare feet Meetin rooms 1,865 s uare feet Ban uet room 1,360 s uare feet Kitchen, buffet area, dining room, lobby lounge, swimming pool, exercise room, business center, gazebo -- and assorted back of house services Level 7 Guest rooms 27 units Assorted back of house services -- Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 4 � C�� 1TRL�1 Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION � a. ,...,..� ��ua.�=� . The total amount of commercial/accessory use square footage is 8,335 square feet which constitutes approximately six percent of the gross floor area (139,950 square feet) of the proposed building. The applicant has provided that the total amount of commercial/accessory use square footage for the entire site (including the proposed building) is approximately 34,595 square feet which constitutes 11.5 percent of the total amount of floor area. It should be noted that this figure may be slightly higher than it should be as the applicant has included some area which Staff does not consider commercial/accessory. Staff generally does not include space which is only accessible by guests and/or staff of the hotel such as exercise rooms or breakfast buffet areas. Staff also does not include such features as lobbies, preparation/pre-function areas and the like only considering those areas which could be used by the general public and could realistically be considered as "parking demand generators". The proposed hotel consists of a single tower just under 100 feet in height (all heights are measured from BFE). Since no portion of the building exceeds 100 feet in height separation requirements from other buildings greater than 100 feet in height as otherwise required by Beach by Design do not apply. The materials and colors of the building will support its Mediterranean Revival architectural style. The building will be painted four earth tones ranging from brownish- gold to medium brown to shades of white. The building facades are broken up with a variety of offsets, windows, balconies and rooflines. The proposed hotel design is compatible with the surrounding uses and complements the existing buildings on site. It will be located approximately 17 feet from the centrally-located building already on the site. All parking for the hotel guests and employees is provided within the first five floors of the building. Guest rooms begin on the third level. A total of 346 spaces are provided within the building. An additiona161 spaces are provided elsewhere on the site either as surface parking or under existing buildings bringing the total number of provided spaces to 407 or 1.29 parking spaces per hotel room where 1.2 spaces is required. The applicant anticipates the proposed hotel will create approximately 100 to 150 new jobs. The proposal maintains the existing 10 foot wide sidewalk which extends along the north side of the site. This sidewalk has already been improved by the City with palm trees and brick detailing. Bricker pavers will be used where the sidewalks cross driveways. The applicant is requesting a two-year development order due to market conditions. Section 4- 407 specifies that an application for a building permit must be submitted within one year of the date the CDB approves the project, unless otherwise specified under this approval. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 5 Y Cl�l4� 1'1'�le� Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PL`u�NING � DEV�LOPMErrr :�� o �.. °�°. P PP DEVELOPMENT REVffiW DIVISION Special Area Plan: Beach bv Des�n: South Beach/Cleanvater Pass District The City has demonstrated through the creation of Beach by Design and subsequent amendments to this plan that it recognizes the need for pedestrian-friendly development in order to create a vibrant active resort and waterfront destination serving tourists and locals alike. It is understood that a broad range of uses including retail sales and service, hotels and motels and restaurants contribute to the creation of the unique character and atmosphere that is Clearwater Beach. The vision of the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design recognizes that this district is a distinctive area of mixed use, high-rise condominiums, low- to mid-rise hotels, outdoor recreation and tourist- and neighborhood-serving retail uses. The document acknowledges that development within the District may be inhibited by though the lack of availability of off-street parking. This development would further the trend of quality redevelopment and/or improvements of properties along South Gulfview Boulevard within the District including the Harborview Grande, the Entrada and Shephard's. Beach by Desi�n: Section VII. Design Gufdelines: Beach by Design provides that the implementation of the document involves more than community redevelopment initiatives, it also involves private development and redevelopment that conforms to design objectives and principles established in Beach by Design. These objectives and principles will help the City promote safety, encourage cleanliness, and provide a comfortable environment. It should be noted that any issue not addressed in the Design Guidelines shall be governed by the requirements of the CDC. Furthermore, the Design Guidelines are intended to be administered in a flexible manner to achieve the highest quality built environment for Clearwater Beach. Section A specifically addresses the issue of density. The proposal includes an additional 125 overnight accommodation units bringing the total number of units on the site to 314. Based on the size of the portion of the site within the T district (3.908 acres) 195 units would be typically permitted where the proposed density is 314 units. The methodology by which this figure is arrived is examined in detail in the Site History section of this report and demonstrates compliance with this provision. Section B specifically addresses height and is delineated in three subsections. Section B.1 provides that a height of up to 150 feet may be permitted where additional density is allocated to the development either by TDRs, or via the Destination Resort Density Pool pursuant to the CRD designation, or via the Hotel Density Reserve where the subject property is located between South Gulfview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico or on the west side of Coronado Drive. The proposal provides for a building just under 100 feet in height, the site was the subject of an approved TDR application (TDR2004-09011) and is consistent with the locational provisions, above. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this provision. Section B.2 requires that portions of any structures which exceed 100 feet are spaced at least 100 feet apart. This section also includes overall separation requirements for structures over 100 feet in height as two options: (1) no more than two structures which exceed 100 feet within 500 feet; or (2) no more than four structures which exceed 100 feet within 800 feet. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 6 � C1La1 1►'aLl.� Level II Flexibfe Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION _.. s �� , �e. .,,, ... Since the proposed building does not exceed 100 feet in height this section is not applicable to the proposal. Section B.3 provides that the floorplate of any portion of a building that exceeds 45 feet in height is limited as follows: a) Between 45 feet and 100 feet the floorplate will be no greater than 25,000 square feet except for parking structures open to the public; and b) Between 100 feet and 150 feet, the floorplate will be no greater than 10,000 square feet; and c) Deviations to the above floorplate requirements may be approved provided the mass and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the m�imum building envelop allowance above 45 feet as described in Section C. 1.4 of the Design Guidelines. The proposal meets this provision in that the floorplate above 45 feet is 24,900 square feet and there is no floorplate over 100 feet. Therefore, this section is supported by the proposal. Section C addresses issues relating to design, scale and building mass. These topics are quantified in six parts as follows: Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet or a single dimension greater than 100 feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint is greater than 5,000 square feet. The applicant has provided that the design of the building meets the requirement of this Design Guideline and Staff concurs. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. No portion of the building fa�ade continues for more than 100 feet in length. The building incorporates a series of articulations of the fenestration with the single longest fa�ade extending approximately 100 feet. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation (with elevation being defined as that portion of a building that is visible from a particular point outside the parcel proposed for development) to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The application indicates compliance with this requirement using windows, balconies and architectural details including decorative grilles, stucco reveals and similar detailing on all facades. Coverage ranges between 61 and 81 percent of any given fa�ade. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C.4 provides that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical m�imum building envelope located above 45 feet will be occupied by a building. The applicant has demonstrated that the overall building mass between 45 and 100 feet constitutes approximately 28 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 7 ' C�l.[R� �1'�ll.� Level II Ftexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT �w��^� ,,.. P pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � � �. . � Section C.S requires that the height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The adjacent South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way is 70 feet in width. The closest point of the building to the north (front) property line is 15 feet. The proposal includes a generous entry plaza with planters and benches. In addition, the ground floor of the building will be dominated by the entry into the hotel itself as well as entry into retail space. The resulting effect is that the ground floor will be pedestrian in scale contributing to the pedestrian experience along South Gulfview Boulevard with active retail space. The mass of the building is mitigated through an extensive use of architectural detailing including awnings, canopies, staggered roof line and windows. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C.6 permits buildings to be designed for a vertical or horizontal mix of permitted uses. The proposal is for a single use; overnight accommodations with ancillary accessory retail and restaurant uses. Therefore, this guideline is not applicable to the development. Section D addresses the issues of sidewalk widths, setbacks and stepbacks. These topics are quantified in three parts as follows: �„ Section D.1 provides that the distances from structures to the edge of the right-of-way should be 15 feet along arterials, and 12 feet along local streets where the proposal provides a setback of 15 feet along South Gulfview Boulevaxd. In addition, a 10 foot pedestrian path is key to establishing a pedestrian-friendly place in the nonresidential environment. The proposal maintains the existing 10 foot sidewalk along South Gulfview Boulevard. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section D.2 provides that except for the side and rear setbacks set forth elsewhere in Beach by Design, no side or rear setback lines are recommended, except as may be required to comply with the City's Fire Code. The proposal includes side (west and east) setbacks of 15 and 10 feet (to building), respectively and a rear (south) setback of 28 feet. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section D.3 addresses setbacks and stepbacks along Coronado Drive. The proposal is not located along Coronado Drive. Therefore this guideline is not applicable to the proposal. Section E addresses issues of street-level facades and the incorporation of human-scale features into the facades of buildings in three parts. Section E.1 requires that at least 60 percent of the street level facades (the portion of the building within 12 feet of grade) of buildings used for nonresidential purposes which abut a public street or pedestrian access way, will include windows or doors that allow pedestrians to see into the building, or landscaped or hardscaped courtyard or plazas, where street level facades are set back at least 15 feet from the edge of the sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the facade is a landscaped or hardscaped courtyard or plaza. In addition parking structures should utilize architectural details and design elements such a false recessed windows, arches, planter boxes, metal grillwork, etc. instead of transparent alternatives. When a parking garage abuts a public road or other public place, it will be designed such that the function of the building is not readily apparent except at points of ingress and egress. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 8 � C�Ltil �l'Al�� Level II Flexibfe Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � r,a w�, H� � � .,: -� � . � The proposed building provides for a traditionally-designed building in a Mediterranean Revival style intended to match the other buildings on the site. The building design incorporates an extensive use of fa�ade offsets, windows and balconies on all facades. In addition, the site plan includes an extensive use of landscaping along the north side of the site along South Gulfview Boulevard. The overall length of the north fa�ade facing South Gulfview Boulevard is nearly 160 feet where nearly 70 percent of that distance is dedicated to retail storefronts and the entrance of the hotel itself. As noted, the first five floors of the building will contain over 300 parking spaces. As mentioned, the first floor will be dominated by retail storefronts and the entrance into the hotel. The second floor is effectively masked with awnings. The third floor fa�ade is articulated and incorporates a variety of architectural details such as grillwork and decorative windows. The fourth and fifth floors are screened with walls designed to resemble building spandrels similar in design to the functional balconies and windows on the rest of the building. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section E.2 provides that window coverings, and other opaque materials may cover no more than 10 percent of the area of any street-level window in a nonresidential building that fronts on a public right-of-way. While this is more of an operationally-related requirement, the applicant has committed to meet this provision. Section E.3 requires that building entrances should be aesthetically inviting and easily identified. The entrances to the building are distinguished with awnings and a generous plaza area including planters and benches. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section F addresses issues related to parking areas. Parking is addressed via five floors of structured parking completely integrated into the design of the building. Surface parking will be buffered from street rights-of-way by a landscape buffer three feet in width. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section G addresses issues related to signage. A sign package has not been included with the submittal. Any proposed signage will be required to meet the requirements of this section of Beach by Design and any applicable portions of the Community Development Code. Section H addresses issues related to sidewalks (also addressed in part by Section D, above) and provides that all sidewalks along arterials and retail streets should be at least 10 feet in width. The proposal maintains the existing 10-foot wide sidewalk along South Gulfview Boulevard. Any repairs to the sidewalk necessitated by construction of the proposal will tie into the existing sidewalk to the north and south of the site matching the existing sidewalk with regard to fit, finish and materials. Pavers will be used to distinguish driveways as they cross the sidewalk. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section I addresses issues related to street furniture and bicycle racks. Benches are proposed with this development. The applicant will coordinate with City Staff with regard to the placement and installation methodology for any street furniture located within the right-of-way which may be proposed at time of permit submittal. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 9 � p�1�t�l } 4. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT � C �.4t1 1'��lel Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION . ��;w , �. Section J addresses issues related to street lighting. Street lighting is not proposed with this development. Therefore, this section is not applicable to the proposal. Section K addresses issues related to fountains. A fountain is not proposed with this development. Therefore, this section is not applicable to the proposal. Section L addresses issues related to materials and colors. Finish materials and building colors are required to reflect Florida or coastal vernacular themes. The proposed hotel building utilizes a Mediterranean Revival design that will match the other buildings on the site. The materials and color of the building will support its Mediterranean Revival architectural style. The building will be painted four earth tones ranging from brownish-gold to medium brown to shades of white. The building facades are broken up with a variety of offsets, windows, balconies and rooflines. While the applicant may adjust the color scheme any such adjustment would require Staff approval and must meet the requirements of this portion of the Design Guidelines. The proposed color scheme and material schedule meets the requirements of this section. Community Development Code ➢ Purpose Intent and Basic Planning Objectives The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code as follows: Section 1-103.B.1. Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through innovative and creative redevelopment. The property owner will redevelop a portion of a site adding much needed overnight accommodation unit capacity. The proposal includes a new attractive building, a vibrant use (overnight accommodations) and contributes to the adjacent public space maintaining an existing sidewalk 10 feet in width, incorporating retail uses, a courtyard, benches and bike racks along South Gulfview Boulevard. The development is considered innovate and creative in that it ultimately results in three hotel buildings on a single property effectively breaking up what could otherwise be a single massive building. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties. Surrounding properties are generally developed with a myriad of uses indicative of a tourist destination including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, bars, nightclubs, outdoor recreation and entertainment, restaurants and attached dwellings. The proposed hotel will constitute an appropriate use for the neighborhood and is a targeted desired use within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design. Surrounding properties will be enhanced through the addition of a use which will contribute to an active and vibrant street life. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.B.3. Strengthening the city's economy and increasing its tax base as a whole. The proposal includes the addition of hotel units which is expected to create approximately 100 to 150 new jobs and will positively contributing to the City's economy and its tax base. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038—Page 10 r C��.l�� 1'�LiLl.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT .. __ ..., .'? .�.. . � � . . . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Section 1-103.D. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of the city a matter of the highest priority and to require that existing and future uses and structures in the city are attractive and well-maintained to the maximum extent permitted by law. The proposal includes a new attractive building characterized by a Mediterranean Revival style to match the other buildings on the site. It also provides lush landscaping along South Gulfview Boulevard and meets the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. The landscape design incorporates plant material that is native and/or naturalized and salt tolerant, while providing visual interest. Medjool Date Palms are proposed along the front of the site to provide height and scale to the building. The pedestrian scale along South Gulfview Boulevard will be enhanced with accent shrubs and dense groundcover beds. The west side of the building will be enhanced with Washingtonian Palms, tree-form Ligustrum and other salt tolerant vegetation to create a landscape that will contribute to the overall sense of place. The site will also be planted with silver buttonwood, foxtail palms, oleander, bird of paradise and ixora. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.E.5. Preserve the natural resources and aesthetic character of the communiry for both the resident and tourist population consistent with the city's economic underpinnings. The proposal will support both the residential and tourist populations with a new hotel with ground floor retail uses and a 10-foot wide sidewalk along South Gulfview Boulevard. The proposal will be consistent with regard to the desired form and function of the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design and meets the Design Guidelines of that document. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 2-401.1 Intent of the T District and RFH FL UP classification. The CDC provides that it is the intent of the T District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by state law. The uses and development potential of a parcel of land within the T District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property, including any acreage or floor area restrictions set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended from time to time. For those parcels within the T District that have an area within the boundaries of and governed by a special area plan approved by the city council and the countywide planning authority, maximum development potential shall be as set forth for each classification of use and location in the approved plan. Section 2.3.3.4.6 of the Countywide Land Use Rules provides that the purpose of the RFH FLUP classification is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, with high density residential and resort, tourist facility uses, and to recognize such areas as well-suited for the combination of residential and temporary lodging use consistent with their location, surrounding uses, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. The site has been developed with a hotel and the proposal provides for 125 additional hotel rooms within a new building which is a use permitted by the RFH FLUP classification. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 11 °ClearwaterLevel II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT :,`�� p PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION u "?x4*`�", a,�`'��:'�"�.its � . .2..; . .;, . .. ➢ Development Parameters Densi : Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation units per acre. Based on the 3.908 acres zoned T District, a m�imum of 195 overnight accommodation units would normally be permissible under current regulations. The site was the subject and approval of a Termination of Status of Nonconformity with regard to density (289 hotel units). That application also included a request to convert 48 hotel units to 36 dwelling units. The conversion rate of hotel units to dwelling units, at the time, was 0.75 residential units per one hotel unit based on a density of 40 hotel and 30 dwelling units per acre (30 divided by 40). In 2006 a minor amendment was approved which converted an additional 52 hotel units to 39 dwelling units at the aforementioned conversion rate which brought the total number of hotel units converted to dwelling units to 100 (48 plus 52). These 100 hotel units converted, at the time, to 75 dwelling units (100 times 0.75). Since 2006 the permitted density for hotel units increased from 40 units per acre to 50 while the density for dwelling units remained the same. That means that the conversion rate of dwelling unit to hotel unit increased from 1.33 dwelling units per hotel unit (40 divided by 30) to 1.67 (50 divided by 30). The applicant is now converting those 75 dwelling units to 125 hotel units (75 times 1.67). Therefore, given the fact that the Termination of Status of Nonconformity and the change in the ratio of hotel units to dwelling units since 2006 the proposed number of hotel units (314) is considered conforming. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR� Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95. The overall proposed ISR is 0.91, which is consistent with the Plan and this Code provision. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum required lot area for Overnight Accommodations is between 10,000 and 20,000 square feet. The subject property is 170,232 square feet in area landward of the seawall (zoned T District). Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for overnight accommodations can range between 100 and 150 feet. The lot width of this site along South Gulfview Boulevard is 467 feet. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum required front setbacks for Overnight Accommodations can range between zero and 15 feet, minimum side setback between zero and 10 feet and minimum rear setback between zero and 20 feet. In addition, CDC Section 3-903 provides that parking lots shall be set back from front property lines a distance of 15 feet, and shall be set back from all other property lines a distance that is consistent with the required perimeter landscape buffer width. However, for properties within the T District, the setback for parking lots shall be based a dimension consistent with the existing/proposed building setback, or at a dimension consistent with setbacks required or otherwise established by Beach by Design, whichever is less. Section F of the Design Guidelines within Beach by Design provides that all parking areas are to be separated from public rights-of-way by a landscaped decorative wall, fence or other opaque landscape treatment of not less than three feet and not more than 3.5 feet Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 12 : Clearwater p p PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT Level II Flexible Develo ment A plication Review DEVELOPMENT REV�W DIVISION :, ��°� � �;..�. � in height. Surface parking areas that are visible from public streets or other public places must be landscaped such that the parking areas are defined more by their landscaping materials than their paved areas when viewed from adjacent properties. The required setback to parking is therefore, three feet. The proposal includes a front (north) setback of 15 feet (to building), zero feet (to entry plaza paving) and three feet (to parking), a side (west) setback of 15 feet (to building) and zero feet (to existing public access sidewalk), a side (east) setback of 10 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing parking and dumpster enclosure), a rear (south) setback of 106 feet (to building. The proposal meets the setback requirements of CDC Table 2-803 for Overnight Accommodations as well as the requirements of CDC Section 3-903 and the applicable sections of Beach by Design. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the maximum height for Overnight Accommodations is between 35 and 100 feet. As examined in detail, above, Beach by Design provides further clarification as to the circumstances under which height may be increased to 150 feet. The proposed building height of just less than 100 feet to the top of the roof deck (113 to mid-point of peaked roof screening for elevator and other mechanical equipment) is consistent with this CDC section. In addition, it should be noted that this site is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design, which is indicated as a distinctive area of mixed use, including high-rise condominiums and resort hotels. The proposal complies with the Code requirements under the definition of "Height, Building or Structure" for elevator and stair overruns and mechanical rooms, which are permitted to extend a maximum of 16 feet above the otherwise permitted height. The design of this project creates a form and function that will be consistent with and enhance the character of this area. Minimum Of�street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum off-street parking requirement for Overnight Accommodations is between one and 1.2 spaces per unit (between 314 and 377 spaces). A total of 407 spaces (1.29 spaces per unit) are provided within the first five floors of the proposed building, under existing buildings and via surface parking spaces. The parking garage must comply with the Building Code and have a vertical clear height for all parking garage levels of not less than seven feet including the entrance and exit. This clear height includes any structural beams, fire sprinkler pipes and heads, electrical conduits and lighting, drainage pipes and any other building elements. The proposal is therefore consistent with the Code provisions of Article 2 Division 8 and Beach by Design and no flexibility from the Code is necessary. Mechanical E�uipment: Pursuant to CDC Sections 3-201.D.1 and 3-903.I, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. There will be mechanical equipment located within and on the roof of the building. The equipment on the roof area will be adequately screened from view from adjacent properties and rights-of-way by solid screening. The screening of the mechanical equipment will be reviewed at time of the building permit submission. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 13 � Clearwater Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVaL PO MENT REVIEW DIV S ON J... .. . . . . . . � . . Si�ht Visibility Trian�Zes: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the intersection of streets and/or driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. This proposal does not propose any structures within the required sight visibility triangles and landscaping within them will be limited to groundcovers and low shrubs, complying with this provision. This proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Landscaping located within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. There are no existing overhead utility lines, serving this development, within the rights-of-way along the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard. All utilities that will serve the site will be placed underground. LandscapinQ: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the T District for this site. This proposal meets the required minimum five-foot wide foundation planting along the north side of the building. It should be noted that plantings are not possible along most of the north farade due to building entrances. The proposal also includes a perimeter landscape buffer approximately three to five feet in width along the north side of the site. The landscape design incorporates plant material that is native andlor naturalized and salt tolerant, while providing visual interest. Medjool Date Palms are proposed along the front of the site to provide height and scale to the building. The pedestrian scale along South Gulfview Boulevard will be enhanced with accent shrubs and dense groundcover beds. The site will also be planted with silver buttonwood, foxtail palms, oleander, bird of paradise and ixora. It should be noted that the proposal is consistent with Section F of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design which provides that surface parking be buffered with landscaping at least three feet in width and 3.5 feet in height. The CDC requires that at least 10 percent of the vehicular use area be dedicated to landscaped area. Approximately 34,000 square feet of exterior vehicular use area is provided (structured or under-building vehicular us area does not count) which requires at least 3,400 square feet of landscape area where approximately 3,500 square feet of interior landscaped area is provided. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.B up to 75 percent of required shade trees may be provided with palm trees. The proposal seeks relief from this requirement in that no shade trees are provided. The applicant has opted to utilize the Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G and as permitted pursuant to CDC Section 6-109.C.4. The criteria for a Comprehensive Landscape Program are provided below: 1. Architectural theme. a. The landsc �� in a comprehensive landscape program shall be desiQned as a part of the architectural theme of the �rincipal buildin�s �ro�osed or developed on the parcel pro�osed for development; or Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 14 a ��i�q} t� PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT � C�Nl r1' Rl��l Level II Flexible Development Appiication Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � �� ;,�;"� "r .�, � ��. .,. . " :; . b. The des�n character location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the com�rehensive landscape pro�ram shall be demonstrablv more attractive than landscapin� otherwise permitted on the t�arcel proposed for development under the minimum landsca�e standards. The proposal exceeds the otherwise maximum percentage of palm trees in lieu of shade trees; no shade trees are provided. The proposal otherwise meets the requirements of the CDC and Beach by Design with regard to landscaping. The proposed landscape plan complements and supports the Mediterranean Revival style of the proposed and existing buildings. Therefore this criterion is met by the proposal. 2. Lighting Anv li�hting pro�osed as a part of a comprehensive landscape pro�ram is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned offwhen the business is closed. This criterion is not applicable to the subject site because the hotel does not close. However, the applicant will ensure that all lighting meets the requirements of CDC Article 3 Division 13. Outdoor Lighting. 3. Community character The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape p�o�ram will enhance the community character of the Citv of Clearwater. The additional landscaping proposed for site in combination with the existing landscaping will make the property more attractive thereby enhancing the community character. The landscape plan, with the exception of providing the entire shade tree requirement in palm trees, meets the requirements of the CDC and Beach by Design. The request to not provide any shade trees is reasonable given the context of the site. CDC Section 3-1202.E requires the provision of one shade tree per landscape island or one tree per 150 square feet of interior landscape space. There are 13 islands located within the surface vehicular use area resulting in the requirement of 13 shade trees. It should be noted that a significant portion of the vehicular use area is dedicated to drive aisles leading connecting structured parking. The islands are already or will be planted with more than 21 palms and 12 accent trees which equate to more than 13 shade trees. The provision of all required shade trees with accent and palm trees is reasonable given the location of the site directly along the Gulf, the limited amount of surface parking and the context of the immediate area which is dominated by a variety of accent trees and palm trees both on private and public lands. 4. Pro�erty values The landsc�e treatment�roposed in the comprehensive landscape pro�am will have a bene zcial impact on the value o f propert� in the immediate vicinitv of the �arcel �roposed or development. The landscaping provided is consistent with the requirements of Beach by Design and other development approved by the City in the area. The proposal will improve the aesthetics of the site and should have a beneficial impact on surrounding properties. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 15 � p�p�r +pr PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT = C\.Ltil 1'1' �Ll.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ��.�� .,�:� _ S. Special area or scenic corridor �lan The landscape treatment proposed in the com�rehensive landscape �ro�am is consistent with an�special area or scenic corridor plan which the Cit�of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel propose�or development is located. Perimeters buffers, as previously mentioned, are not required by the CDC in the T District except as otherwise required by Beach by Design. Parking areas are required by Section F of the Design Guidelines within Beach by Design to be buffered from public rights-of-way by a landscape buffer at least three feet in width and 3.5 feet in height. The site does include a perimeter buffer along South Gulfview Boulevard between five and 15 feet in width which meets the requirement of Beach by Design. Solid Waste: The proposal will include a trash collection facility within the building and roll-out dumpsters which will be moved outside to a staging area on collection days. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. SSi�nage: A sign package has not been included with the submittal. Any proposed signage will be required to meet the requirements of this section of Beach by Design and any applicable portions of the Community Development Code. ➢ General A�plicability Criteria Requirements The proposal supports the General Applicability requirements of this Code as follows: Section 3-914.A.1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposal includes a 125-unit hotel within a single 10-story building with five floors of parking and assorted accessory uses such as a restaurant, bar, gym, retail and meeting spaces. The proposal will bring the total number of hotel units on the site to 314. The proposed hotel building will match the Mediterranean Revival style of the other three buildings on the site. The subject site is surrounded by a myriad of uses indicative of a tourist destination including overnight accommodations, retail sales and services, baxs, nightclubs, outdoor recreation and entertainment, restaurants and attached dwellings. The proposed hotel will constitute an appropriate use for the neighborhood and is a targeted desired use within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design. The proposal includes lush landscaping which exceeds the intent of the CDC and will complement and enhance surrounding properties. The 440 and 450 West attached dwelling condominiums towers are located to the north of this subject property and are 157 feet in height (each tower). Otherwise, the immediate vicinity is typified by buildings between two and nine floors. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 3-914.A.2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposal is, as discussed in relation to CDC Section 3-914.A.1, above, consistent with the character of adjacent properties and with the intent and vision of Beach by Design, the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District and the Design Guidelines. The applicant has shown through Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 16 ° p� �Tn + PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT � C L(.�� 1 RL�� Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � �r.''�.-�N...' � v:�:;��3 r,;�v:x .� � k. � _ .. .... . substantial competent evidence that the proposal is similar in nature vis-a-vis form and function to adjacent and nearby properties. As mentioned, this site is already developed as a hotel with all other properties and specifically adjacent properties fully or nearly fully developed with a myriad of uses including mixed use, high-rise condominiums, resort hotels, outdoor recreation and entertainment, retail uses and other uses indicative of a tourist destination. The proposal will not impair the value of adjacent properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or workfng in the neighborhood. The proposal, similar to that as already existing on site and in the immediate vicinity, will likely have no effect, negative or otherwise, on the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffac congestion. The proposal has been designed to have a minimal effect on trafiic congestion. Naturally, the addition of 125 hotel units will increase the amount of traffic in the area. However, this expected increase in traffic has been mitigated with adequate on-site stacking space and parking in excess of the minimum required. The submitted Traffic Impact Study indicates that the proposal will have minimal effect on the Level of Service of the surrounding roadways. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A. S. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. As previously discussed, the community character consists primarily of a variety of uses including attached dwellings, outdoor recreation and entertainment, retail sales and service, hotels and motels and restaurants within multi-story attached dwellings between two and 15 stories. The proposal is to bring the total number of hotel rooms on the site to 314 with a new 10-story, 125-unit hotel. The proposed hotel building will match the Mediterranean Revival style of the three other buildings on the site and will complement and enhance adjacent properties. The proposal, as examined in detail elsewhere in this report, is consistent with Beach by Design. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Section 3-914.A.6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse visual and acoustic impacts on adjacent properties. There should be no olfactory impacts of any kind. The primary active use area of the proposal will be the pool and patio area located on the sixth floor (as well as the existing at-grade pool and patio centrally located along the south side of the site) and will be buffered from the adjacent residential use to the west with a stair tower and pool cabanas. In addition, the building to the west includes few windows on its east fa�ade overlooking the proposed pool. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 17 � C�l.�l Il'�I�l.l Level II Flexible Deve�opmentApplication Review DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDI�VISION o . ,.. , . � °:'. e ,ba ! �w,,..�x, - . . . . ➢ Overnight Accommodation criteria reyuirements The proposal supports the specific Overnight Accommodations criteria pursuant to CDC Section 2-803.J as follows: 1. With the exception of those properties located on Clearwater Beach, the parcel proposed for development shall.front on but shall not involve direct access to a major arterial street unless no other means of access would be possible. The property, already developed as an Overnight Accommodation, is located on a major arterial street. However, there are no other means of accessing the street. In addition, the proposal is located on Clearwater Beach. The proposal includes utilizing the existing driveways. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this criterion. 2. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance. The proposal includes a height of just less than 100 feet. The proposed height provides for the room to provide landscaping in excess of the intent of the CDC and to provide a building in scale with the other buildings on the site and adjacent to the property. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC criterion. 3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign program. A sign package has not been included with the submittal. Any proposed signage will be required to meet the requirements of this section of Beach by Design and any applicable portions of the Community Development Code. Therefore, while this criterion is applicable to the proposal is will be applied when a sign package is submitted to Staff for review. 4. Front setback: a. The reduced setback shall contribute to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance; and c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan It should be noted that the provided setbacks are consistent with that as otherwise required as a Level I Flexible Standard Development; it is the height which requires that the proposal be reviewed as a Level II Flexible Development. As discussed in detail, the proposal includes retail space along nearly half of the fa�ade facing South Gulfview Boulevard, an entry courtyard with seating and bike racks and extensive landscaping in excess of that as otherwise required by the CDC. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC criterion. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 18 a p�y� �7 } �+ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ; C\.tll /l'�l��l Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review navEr.orMENTaEV�wnrvisiox - �� .,.,,*�� o,,. . S. Side and rear setbacks: a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles and/or personnel; b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, andlor improved building design and appearance; and c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan As mentioned, all setbacks are met with the proposal and access to the rear of the building by emergency vehicles and/or personnel is not prevented. As discussed in detail, the proposal includes retail space along nearly half of the fa�ade facing South Gulfview Boulevard, an entry courtyard with seating and bike racks and extensive landscaping in excess of that as otherwise required by the CDC. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC criterion. 6. Off-street parking: a. The proposed development contains no more than 130 rooms; and b. The proposed development is within 1, 000 feet of an existing public parking garage with documented available capacity As mentioned, 1.2 spaces per room are required and 1.29 spaces per room are provided. The request does not include a reduction in parking. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable to the proposal. 7. The design of all buildings shall comply with the Tourist District site and architectural design guidelines in Section 3-501, as applicable. As discussed in detail in this document, the proposal is fully compliant with all applicable portions of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC criterion. 8. Lot area andlor width: The reduction shall not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity. The site exceeds the otherwise minimum lot area and width requirements of the CDC. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC criterion. 9. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area, have a hurricane evacuation plan (HEP) requiring the use close when a hurricane watch is posted; The applicant has committed to providing a HEP prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and a condition of approval to this effect has been included with Staf�s recommendation. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC criterion. 10. A development agreement must be approved by the city council pursuant to F.S. �� 163.3221-163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the development proposal exceeds the base density and/or base F.A.R. established for the underlying Future Land Use designation. The development agreement shall; a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to alternative density/intensity, and as amended from time to time; Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 19 � C�� ►1'[tl�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVEL PO MENT REVffiW DIV S ON u w �. �:. ° , xu� �r?. a ^" .. . . . . b. Be recorded with the clerk of the circuit court pursuant to F.S. � 163.3239, with a copy filed with the property appraiser's office, and a copy submitted to the PPC and CPA for receipt and filing within 14 days after recording; and c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which shall be recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County prior to the issuance of any building permit for the overnight accommodations use. The density associated with the site was approved as part of a Flexible Development request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity. There is no requirement for the provision of a Development Agreement. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable to the proposal. 11. Accessory Uses a. Accessory uses must be incidental, subordinate, and customarily accessory to overnight accommodations; The site will include a total GFA (excluding parking areas, stairwells and elevator shafts) of 139,950 square feet. Accessory uses will encompass 8,335 square feet which constitutes approximately six percent of the GFA of the proposed building. The total amount of commercial/accessory use square footage is 8,335 squaxe feet which constitutes approximately six percent of the gross floor area (139,950 square feet) of the proposed building. The applicant has provided that the total amount of commercial/accessory use square footage for the entire site (including the proposed building) is approximately 34,595 square feet which constitutes 11.5 percent of the total amount of floor area. It should be noted that this figure may be slightly higher than it should be as the applicant has included some area which Staff does not consider commercial/accessory. Staff generally does not include space which is only accessible by guests and/or staff of the hotel such as exercise rooms or breakfast buffet areas. Staff does not include such features as lobbies, preparation/pre-function areas and the like. Staff will only include those areas which could be used by the general public and could realistically be considered as "parking generators". Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC criterion. b. The following shall apply to required parking for accessory uses: i. Accessory uses located within the building interior may occupy between 15 percent and 20 percent of the gross floor area of the development, but only when additional parking is provided for that portion of the accessory uses which exceeds 15 percent. The required amount of parking shall be calculated by using the minimum off-street parking development standard for the most intensive accessory use(s). Where there is a range of parking standards, the lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calculate the additional amount of off-street parking required for the project. In projects where the interior accessory uses exceed 20 percent of the building gross floor area, all interior accessory uses shall be considered additional primary uses for purposes of calculating development potential and parking requirements; ii. Regardless of the gross floor area percentage, overnight accommodations with fewer than SO rooms that have a full service restaurant shall comply with the parking standards for the restaurant use as contained in Table 2-803. The lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calculate the additional amount of off-street parking required for the restaurant. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 20 � q� �in } PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT � C�tU �1'tll�� Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ��.� �,,�:...,. The proposal exceeds the 50-room limitation, above. In addition, the total amount of accessory space on the site constitutes approximately 11.5 percent of the total GFA. Therefore, parking may be based at 1.2 spaces per room where 1.29 spaces are provided. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC criterion c. In addition to the requirements above, for those projects that request additional rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design and whose interior accessory uses are between ten percent and 1 S percent of the gross floor area of the proposed building, density shall be calculated as follows: i. Calculate the maximum number of units allowed by the base density; ii. Calculate the maximum number of units that may be allocated from the Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design; iii. Add the figures determined in i. and ii. to determine the total number of units allowed for the site; iv. Divide the total number of units allowed, as calculated in iii., by the total land area to determine the resulting units per acre for the project site; v. Determine the total floor area of all interior accessory uses exceeding ten percent of the gross floor area of the proposed building; vi. Subtract the figure determined in v. from the total land area, and divide this difference by 43, 560 to determine the net acreage; vii. Multiply the net acreage derived in vi. by the applicable resulting units per acre figure determined in iv. The resulting product is the maximum number of rooms allowable for the project; and viii. The final allocation of rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve shall be determined by multiplying the net acreage determined in vi. by the base density and subtracting this product from the maximum number of rooms allowable for the project as determined in vii. No additional rooms are requested from the Hotel Density Reserve. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable to the proposal. d. Signage for any accessory use shall be subordinate to and incorporated into the primary freestanding signage for the overnight accommodation use. In no case shall more than 25 percent of the sign area be dedicated to the accessory uses. A sign package has not been included with the submittal. Any proposed signage will be required to meet the requirements of this section of Beach by Design and any applicable portions of the Community Development Code. Therefore, while this criterion is applicable to the proposal is will be applied when a sign package is submitted to Staff for review. e. Those developments that have obtained additional density from the Destination Resort Density Pool established in Beach by Design are not subject to the requirements set forth in Sections 2-803.I.11. a—d. The Pool is no longer in effect. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable to the proposal. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 21 � Cl�.f.�l 1'!'[il�i Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELO �MENTREVIEWDIVIS ON u ..:�.:.:°�.�.�.�4�£��:��r x.°."� - .. Section 4-206.D.4: Burden of proof. The burden of proof is upon the applicant to show by substantial competent evidence that he is entitled to the approval requested. The applicant has adequately demonstrated through the submittal of substantial competent evidence that the request is entitled to the approval requested as required by CDC Section 4- 206.D.4. Comprehensive Plan: The proposal is supported by applicable various Goals, Objectives and/or Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan as follows: Future Land Use Plan Element Policy A.1.2.1 - The City shall require new or redeveloped overnight accommodations uses located within the City's coastal storm area to have a hurricane evacuation plan, approved by the City, for all guests. This plan shall require the commencement of evacuation of hotel guests as soon as a hurricane watch is posted for the City. A Hurricane Evacuation Plan will be submitted to and approved by the City prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Therefore, the proposal will support this Policy Policy A.3.2.1 - All new development or redevelopment of property within the Ciry of Clearwater shall meet all landscape requirements of the Community Development Code. The proposal, as discussed in detail, meets the requirements of the CDC by meeting the criteria of a Comprehensive Landscape Program and providing landscaping in excess of the intent of the CDC and supports this Policy. Objective A.S.S - Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity. The proposal includes the redevelopment of lot currently developed with a 189-unit hotel. The proposal includes a new attractive overnight accommodations use with an additional 125 hotel units. As explored in detail, the proposed building meets the requirements of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design, is supported by the vision of the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District and supports this Objective. Policy A. 5.5.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. As mentioned above, the proposal is consistent with the vision of Beach by Design, the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District and the Design Guidelines and supports this Policy. Objective A.6.1 - The redevelopment of blighted, substandard, inefficient andlor obsolete areas shall be a high priority and promoted through the implementation of redevelopment and special area plans, the construction of catalytic private projects, city investment, and continued emphasis on property maintenance standards. In adopting Beach by Design the City recognized that large portions of the Beach could be classified as blighted, substandard and suffered from "obsolescence and age". One of the goals of Beach by Design is to reverse this trend of disinvestment. This goal is well on the way to being met (perhaps even exceeded) in many areas of the Beach. The South Beach/Clearwater Pass District is one area that has seen a great deal of redevelopment activity. The proposed hotel should be seen as an important linchpin in tying the Beach Walk District with the South Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 22 Y Clb(�t�1'1'�lt.l Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT � <�� s��... � ��, �. p pP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Beach/Clearwater Pass District and one more step in the revitalization of the Beach and supports this Objective. Policy A.6.1.2 - Renewal of the beach tourist district shall be encouraged through the establishment of distinct districts within Clearwater Beach, the establishment of a limited density pool of additional hotel rooms to be used in specified geographic areas of Clearwater Beach, enhancement of public rights-of-way, the vacation of public rights-of-way when appropriate, transportation improvements, inter-beach and intra-beach transit, transfer of development rights and the use of design guidelines, pursuant to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. As explored previously in this document, the site was the subject of a Termination of Status of Nonconformity. The continued development of this parcel with a hotel will play an important role in the renewal and revitalization of the Beach. Therefore, the proposal supports this Policy. Objective A.6.6 - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic sector. Policy A.6.6.1 - The City supports and encourages the continued development and redevelopment of overnight accommodation uses. The proposed redevelopment includes an overnight accommodation use which will serve tourists and locals alike contributing to a vibrant successful resort destination and supports this Objective and Policy. Policy A.6.8.3 - Where appropriate, development shall provide a sense of pedestrian scale on streets through minimal front setbacks, similar building heights, street trees and proportionaliry of building heights to street widths. The proposal includes an expansion of an existing successful overnight accommodation use with an overall height of just under than 100 feet. All required setbacks are met with the proposal. The design of the building incorporates an extensive use of windows, balconies and other architectural detailing. The street-level fa�ade of the building along South Gulfview Boulevard is dominated by storefronts and the entrance into the hotel lobby. The overall effect of the proposal will pedestrian-scale consistent with the goals and vision of Beach by Design and the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District and supports this Policy. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 50 overnight 314 overnight accommodation units X�° Z accommodation units (8035 units per acre based on that per acre (195 units) portion of the site within the T District) Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.91 X Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 23 � C�L141 �Rl�l Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIE.W DIVISION �s�'�. .. ., � Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Minimum Lot Area 10,000 - 20,000 sq.ft. 170,232 sq.ft. (T District) X 41,905 sq.ft. (OS/R District - submerged) Minimum Lot Width 100 - 150 feet 467 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: 0- 15 feet North: 15 feet (to building) XZ Zero feet (to entry plaza paving) 3 feet (to pavement) Side: 0- 10 feet East: 10 feet (to building) XZ Zero feet (to existing parking and dumpster enclosure) West: 15 feet (to building) XZ Zero feet (to existing public access sidewalk) Rear: 0- 20 feet South: 106 feet (to building) XZ Maximum Height 35 - 100 feet 99.8 feet above BFE to top of roof deck XZ (113 to mid-point of peaked roof screening elevator and other mechanical equipment) Minimum 1- 1.2 spaces per 407 spaces (1.29 parking spaces per hotel XZ Off-Street Parking room (314 to 377 room) s aces � Per Termination of Status of Nonconformity under FLD2004-04025, conversion calculations and Transfer of Development Rights under TDR2004-09011. Z See analysis in Staff Report. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.D (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent I. T'he development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X' the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of Xl the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X� development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed Xl development. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 24 Y��e�l 1'Y�L�1 Level II Flexible Development Application Review u��.'n'r�`��'�"'n'�'a...: ''��'_"�� ,�=.- , .:, - .. �:� �. � .. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscaoe desien and anvronriate distances between buildings. � See analysis in Staff Report. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Consistent �— .►� Inconsistent COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in hazmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. T'he proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 25 Consistent I Inconsistent X' X1 X� �► : Clearwater Level II Flexible Development Application Review ° �i.�...i..,../�.i.w,�.';,'�,'�?.a`��.,,"�°'� s" . . . . . 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. 1 See analysis in staff report. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Consistent � Inconsistent COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM STANDARDS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Comprehensive Landscape Program as per CDC Section 3-1202.G: 1. Architectural theme. a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. 4. 5. � Community character. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. Properry values. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Special area or scenic corridor plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. See analysis in Staff Report Consistent Inconsistent X� X� X� X1 X� COMPLIANCE WITH BEACHBYDESIGNDESIGN GUIDELINES 1. Section A: Density. 2. Section B: Height. 3. Section C: Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings. 4. Section D: Setbacks. 5. Section: Street-Level Fa�ades. 6. Section F: Parking Areas. 7. Section G: Signage. 8. Section H: Sidewalks. 9. Section I: Street Furniture and Bicycle Racks. 10. Section J: Street Lighting. 11. Section K: Fountains. 12. Section L: Materiais and Colors. 1 See analysis in Sta,�'Report. Communiry Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 26 Consistent I Inconsistent X1 X' X� X' X� X� N/A� X1 Xl N/A1 N/A� XI � Cll.�� ►1't�t�l.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review FLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � �.c�.� ... u ��s�✓v�_.i�r..^'". . . . SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of December 2, 2013, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Finding;s of Fact The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 4.87 total acres (3.908 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.962 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) is located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard, between Hamden Drive and Bayway Boulevard with 467 feet of frontage along South Gulf Boulevard and 600 feet of frontage along the Gulf of Mexico water (along the seawall); 2. On January 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 14 conditions Case Nos. FLD2004-04025/TDR2004-0901 l; 3. On December 28, 2005, the Community Development Coordinator approved a minor amendment to the approved site plan including a revised roof plan and architectural detailing, modifications to the building elevations, re-routing of a sidewalk, modification to foundation landscaping and the elimination of a second story covered walkway; 4. On April 5, 2006, the Community Development Coordinator approved a minor amendment to the approved site plan which converted 52 hotel units to 39 residential units where the requisite number of parking spaces would be provided; 5. On May 15, 2007, the CDB approved with four conditions Case No. FLD2007-03008 to permit the addition of a 6,144 square-foot conference center as an accessory use to an existing hotel as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the (then) provisions of Section 2-803.C. 6. A total of 100 hotel units were converted to 75 dwelling units by 2006. 7. Since 2006 the density for hotel units in the T District increased from 40 units per acre to 50 units per acre where the density for dwelling units remain constant at 30 units per acre thereby increasing the conversion rate of dwelling units to hotel units; 8. The 75 dwellings previously converted from 100 hotel units are now being converted to 125 hotel units. 9. The property is currently being used as a 189-unit hotel within two buildings; 10. That the subject property is located within the Tourist (T) and Open Space/Recreation (O/SR) Districts and the corresponding Resort Facilities High (RFH) and Water Future Land Use Plan categories; 1 l. That the subject property is located in the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design; 12. The proposal is to construct a new hotel building on the property consisting of 125 overnight accommodation units; 13. The proposal includes five floors of parking, new and existing surface parking and existing parking under existing buildings for a total of 407 parking spaces at 1.29 parking spaces per hotel room; 14. The proposed building height is 99.8 feet from the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) top of roof deck (113 to mid-point of peaked roof screening elevator and other mechanical equipment); Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 27 � C1L(��11ftL�l Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANMNG&DEVELOPMENT P pP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION - �>�� : a � °<z�� ., a . � 15. The proposal includes a front (north) setback of 15 feet (to building), zero feet (to entry plaza paving) and three feet (to parking), a side (west) setback of 15 feet (to building) and zero feet (to existing public access sidewalk), a side (east) setback of 10 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing parking and dumpster enclosure), a rear (south) setback of 106 feet (to building); 16. That the proposal is otherwise fully in compliance with all applicable portions of the Beach by Design guidelines; and 17. There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development is consistent with the vision and intent of the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design 3. That the development is consistent with the General Purposes of the Community Development including CDC Sections 1-103.B, D and E.S; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per CDC Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria for a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G; 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A; 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.J for Overnight Accommodations; 8. That the development is consistent with applicable portions of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and 9. That the application is consistent with the requirement for the submittal of substantial competent evidence as per CDC Section 4-206.D.4. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit a 314-room overnight accommodation use (including 189 existing units and 75 dwelling units converted to 125 overnight accommodation units previously approved and transferred under FLD2004-04025 and TDR2004-09011) in the Tourist (T) and Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) Districts with a lot area of 4.87 acres (3.908 acres zoned T District and 0.962 acres zoned OS/R District), a lot width of 467 feet, a front (north) setback of 15 feet (to building), zero feet (to entry plaza paving) and three feet (to parking), a side (west) setback of 15 feet (to building) and zero feet (to existing public access sidewalk), a side (east) setback of 10 feet (to existing building) and zero feet (to existing parking and dumpster enclosure), a rear (south) setback of 106 feet (to building), a building height of 99.8 feet above Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to top of roof deck (113 to mid-point of peaked roof screening elevator and other mechanical equipment) and 407 parking spaces at 1.29 parking spaces per hotel room, under the provisions of CDC Section 2-803.J; approval of a two-year development order; and to fulfill the shade tree requirement solely with palm and understory trees as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of 3-1202.G subject to the following conditions: Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 28 � p �Tq+ p�+ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT = C l.��l'1'[iLt�l Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review �EVeLOPMExrxEV�wDivisiox - :� ��.��_ , . Conditions of Approval: General/Miscellaneous Conditions 1. That the fnal design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 2. That there be no public/guest use 100 feet or higher; 3. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign and that all signs be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building, and that any freestanding signs be limited to the minimum permitted by the CDC with regard to area, height and number; 4. That amplifiers or amplified sound of any kind is prohibited outdoors or, when located within the building, when any window of any room where such amplification is produced is open, after 10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and after 11:00 p.m. Friday and Saturday; 5. That issuance of a development permit by the City of Clearwater does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the City for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law; 6. That all irrigation systems be connected to the City reclaimed water system where available per Clearwater Code of Ordinances, Article IX., Reclaimed Water System, Section 32.376. Reclaimed water lines are available in the Gulfview Blvd rights-of-way; 7. That all other applicable local, state and/or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development; 8. That application for a building permit be submitted no later than January 21, 2016, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407; Timing Conditions - prior to issuance ofpermit 9. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks or variances obtained; 10. That prior to the issuance of building permits, sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Engineering Division; 11. That prior to the issuance of any permits, a revised landscape plan be submitted to and approved by Staff which indicates all proposed plant material be CDC-compliant in all respects including but not limited to size; 12. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be shown to be painted the same color as the portion of the building to which such features are attached; 13. That prior to the issuance of any permits, revised site plan are submitted to and approved by Staff which indicate that pavers or some other suitable paving material, as coordinated with Staff with regard to materials and installation methodology, are used where driveways (existing and/or proposed) traverse sidewalks (existing or proposed); 14. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 29 ° Clearwater Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT p PP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION ; '..�.i`.i'�..i`-i�-'�,>s��m�.��3�"�": °� :. .,.� . . . . . . needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150 percent of its rated capacity; 15. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, evidence be submitted to and approved by Staff which indicates that the proposed dumpster will meet the requirements of NFPA-1, 2009 edition by providing a one-hour separation and a fire sprinkler system for the protection of the structure. Such evidence will be required to have been designed by a fire protection engineer in addition to the architect of record detailing the one hour rating of the area in question; 16. That prior to the issuance of any permits, all sub-standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be shown on plans to be improved to meet the requirement of Local, State and/or Federal standards including A.D.A. requirements (truncated domes per FDOT Index #304); 17. That prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of the General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Fire Departments be addressed, and that any applicable Parks and Recreation impact fees be paid; Timing Conditions - prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 18. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the sidewalk and any associated sidewalk amenities be installed to the satisfaction of City Staff along South Gulfview Boulevard; 19. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of a Hurricane Evacuation Plan be provided to the City; 20. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy that all required Transportation Impact Fees be paid; and 21. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all servi 'nes onto the property shall be installed underground. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Mark T. Parry, AICP, P anner III ATTACHMENTS: Photographs Community Development Board — January 21, 2014 FLD2013-11038 — Page 30 Luohi�� bti across l�ullvie�� lil��. � �. �,,,`�, s .x' `k� .; �� <�_' 4 � i� '' �� ■ • 1/ 1 �� 8 � �?` 1 � �/ I . � �� • 0 �� I� I . u_,_ �� ...:�:Ar;: � �� I y �� _.,..�� .�.�....��._.--�--°�.... ,.�,,. ----. i�. � Looking Ul1' across Gtil�view 131vd. �.� � _.. � ,.1 i f_ t r-_ -�, . ;i��. .. - . �.� ..� Looking E along the S sidc ��; �u_�j �_ �i� `.'+��. , �. -- �, � ��... �:�� _ , -� --��, � : x �� F `i ' , �� "'�tiq>°�' r,.,u y�.�y r�, w �,Six fk-,:f `' �?.'S: ��. . .... �.z:� . ._ .,.+»�,. . ..,.e�__,_ LookittgNEfromthc ��ti ci,in.i;,iui�,ii, ^ L_ �� _.-__ i_ . ._. = �i.a�,j[� . -'_ ...��,�' •,�.: r't`, . . -' , > .��..��} �� zJ.i�� d� �� \'�%/ �, �� s�b�i��.^��",-� �ii _ �� ,� �` "'�es�l" Y > '^ '3 '�,,° ��a��' �"�.,,•,;c�l� — , �;ria.�� "�s`�`---�_- -�'-�°�'" Loohing N Irum � sidc ul 5uc. . ., � �t. _---��, ` a.� �'" " ��,4.,n� ��', ��t �xistine huildines on ,itc 521 GULFVIEW BOULEVARD FLD2013-11038 MARK T. PARRY 1655 Linwood Drive Tel: (727) 742.2461 Clearwater, FL 33755 E-mail: mparry@tampabay.rr.com SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS A dedicated, AICP certified professional Planner focused on contributing to the field of Urban Planning experienced in public and private sector planning. An excellent communicator, able to effectively interact with clients, local government officials and business professionals at all levels. Experienced in various aspects of urban design and planning, zoning regulations and permitting. OBJECTIVE To secure a Planning position which will allow me to continue improving the built environment and my community through sound and innovative planning and design principals. EDUCATION COOK COLLEGE, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, New Brunswick, NJ B.S. Landscape Architecture Major, Urban Planning Certification B.S. Environmental Planning and Design Certificate Urban Planning Golden Key National Honor Society; Sigma Lambda Alpha American Planning Association (Florida Chapter); member AICP #020597 40-hour OSHA (Hazwoper) Training PLANNER III PLANNING DEPARTMENT, CITY OF CLEARWATER 04/12 - Present 08/98 — 04/05 • Responsible for nonresidential and single/multi-family site plan review and permitting. • Assist in the implementation and subsequent review of the Community Development Code. • Responsible for assessing and writing Community Development Code amendments. • Land Development Code development, interpretation and application. • Provide, inspect and direct landscape review/design. • Acting Development Review Manager 9/99 — 11/99 and 01/05 — 03/05. • Manage and direct Associate Planners. • Review, process and present variance/conditional use, land use/zoning atlas amendment and annexation applications at in-house and public review meetings. • Principle Planner in creating and implementing Clearwater's Downtown Design Guidelines. Assisted in the implementation and application of the Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan. SENIOR PLANNER DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, CARDNO TBE 04/05 — 04/12 . Planner of record for Cities of Indian Rocks Beach, Seminole and Clearwater and Town of Belleair. • Responsible for nonresidential and single/multi-family site plan review and permitting. • Perform site design and inspections. • Provide technical planning support for engineering department. • Provide support for Zoning Code, Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Land Use Plan amendments. • Research and write Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. • Create and update Special Area Plans/Form-based Codes. • Provide CADD support. . Assist with creating redevelopment marketing material. . Perform technical environmental services including soil and groundwater sampling. Designer/Owner GREENSCAPES-GLD, MARLBORO, NJ 9�92 - C�9$ • Founded and established a local garden and landscape business. • Plan and oversee installation of commercial and residential landscaping projects utilizing a variety of CADD and photo-manipulation programs. • Develop and implement advertising programs, brochures and graphics. • Estimate, bid and negotiate jobs. • Source and negotiate purchase of materials and equipment. • Manage, train and schedule installation crews. Program Supervisor LONGSTREET FARM, MONMOUTH COUNTY PARK SYSTEM, HOLMDEL, NJ • Assisted in formulating and running children's summer program ("Hayseed"). • Created and coordinated daily programs and schedules for 6-9 year old groups. . Supervised several other programs throughout the year. • Created a demand which was twice the program's capacity after the first year. COMPUTER SKILLS 6/87 - 8/93 Access, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Works, ClarisWorks, MS Word, Land Designer Pro, Permit Plan, Excel, Cornerstone, AutoCADD, PowerPoint, Publisher LL ° � ��r�ater � Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORREtT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES� TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE StHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVlEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SEi'S OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIESj. PLAiyS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLiCANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES T�D COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE C�MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELiMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $1,205 PROPEPtTY OWNER (PER DEED): Deeade Gulf Coast Hotel Partners, LP & J.K. Gulfview LLC MAI�ING ADDRESS: 13555 bishops ct Brookfield Wisconsin 53005 PHONE NUMBER: 262-797-9215 EMAIL: jkeier@decadegroup.com Synergy Civil Engineering, Inc. (Michael J. Palmer, P.E.), Joe Burdette, Istvan Psteranecb, AGENT OR REPRESENTATiVE: Jordan behar MAlLING ADDRESS: 3000 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Suite 201 PHONE NUMBER: 727-796-1926 EMAIL: mpalme�aJsynergycivileng.com 521 S. Gulfview 8lvd Clearwater, FL 33767 ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: PARCEL NUMBER(S): 17/29/IS/D0000/220/0200 LEGAL DESCRIPT�ON: See attaehment "A" PROPOSED USE(5): Existing 189 Room Hotel, Proposed 125 Room limited services Hotel & Existing on erenee enter DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include all requested code flexibility; e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot size, !ot width, specific use, etc.): ATTACHMENT "B" Planning 8� Development DepaRment, 100 S. Myrt�e Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01/12 LL ° � ear�vater U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE fOLIOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRE'lY. FAiLURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSiBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZOfVlNG DISTRiCT: �UTURE LAND USE PIAN DESIGNATlON: Tourist District "T" (UPLAND) TouristDistric7 "OS/R"(SUBMERGED) Resort Facilities High "RFH" EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): Existing 189 Room Hotel & Existing Conference Center austtng oom ote , opose aom imrte servrces ote xtsting PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain):Con/'erence Center UPLAND 170,242J1 UPLAND 3.908 +/- SITE AREA: SUBMERGED 41,905.29 Sq, ft, SUBMERGED 0.962+/- acres TOTAL 212,148.00 TOTAL �87 GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: 147,333 sq. ft. LESS THAN IS% ACCESSORY IISE=18,840 =12.79% Proposed: 316,885 sq. ft. 153,085 BLG. + 163,800 PARKING GARAGE Maximum Allowable: NA sq. ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses): First use: 153,085 + 163,800 sq. ft. = 316,885 OVER NIGHT ACCOMMONDATIUN Second use: sq. ft.LESS THAN 1S% ACCESSORY IISE=15,775 =10.29% Third use: sq. ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: N/A (IS% accessory use) Proposed: N/A (IS% accessory use) Maximum Allowable: N/A BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1�` floor square foota�e of all buildings): Existing: 28,065 + 7363=35,428 sq. ft. ( 1� �� 9� of site) Proposed: 45,897+2d,348+7363 sq. ft. ( 38.33 % of site)PROPOSED �dE EXISTINGHOTEL & Maximum Permitted: 161,731 sq. ft. ( 95 % of site) Conference Building =81,608 SF GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: 11,300 Sq, ft, � S 42 % of site) Proposed: 3,375 Sq. �. ( 1.59 % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: 98,481 sq. ft. ( 46.42 Proposed: 33,748 sq. ft. ( 15.90 % of site) % of site) Planning d� Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 01/12 1MP£RVi0U5 SURFACE RATIp ;totai square footaga �f ;rr�pervious araas tlivided by the tatal ;quare footage ot �ntire site} Exzs?irg: 0.9_i Pr�posers: �19{ �vtaximum Permi?ted: � 95 DENSI7Y (+.�nrts, raoms or bec3s per acre): Existing: !$9 units PsaposeC: (SeeExhibil „F,•) Max�rnum Perm.itted: IS� per acse 8UlLDING NEIGHT ��,� �xisting: �� Proposed: �� 6 ��' obnne BFE Maximum Permitted: JtN1'+BFE= 11�.0 � OF�-57RfE7 PARiUNG: �j� �� Existing: 20�0 (61 fn rt»urin) .� i�� G�� l �r�posed: � �� Totat Parking =7�fv�,+ hl =� Min�mum Required: 1.- .k 3J0 =.�77 i:z� �oo. �-c� WHAT IS 7HE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? S�+� ZONIWG DISTRlCTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: t�p�n: Ti�urfst Sauth: Tourist East: TourCst Wezt: !�S/R � /� STATE Of FLORIDA, COUNTY OF DlNELLAS f, *he undersigned, acknowledge that aii Sworn to and subscribec before me this �� 5� day pf r�presentatior.s madz in this application are true ana G�_�y�� -^��., accurate to ihe best of my knowiedge and authorize ____._I_�� Lo me and/or by Cicy r�sentatives to visit and phatograph the who }s pers�nally known has �raperky ��scribep �� ?'his appfication. produced � l` i �'�l C,' � + r ` 1 ` p C. AllEillF31 „ , _ , �1 _��.`�J�`�i-'�,..'�- + _ R _�_.�,.. � �� '. . c _ �t�92U5�3 21 S+gnature qf p►�opery owner or representative Notary public, My commfssian expiresr �. Planning 3 Devefopment DepaAment. 700 3. AAyrthe Avenue. GSearwator. F� 33?55. 7a1: 72]-562-4567; Fax: 727-362�865 Page 3 of 8 Revised 0�1112 LL ° � �arwater U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Site Plan Submittal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLiCATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ANDJOR PLANS: ❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Appiication Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of alt public and private easements including officiaf records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. ❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. ❑ A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum sca�e of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: ❑ Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individuaf sheet numbers referenced thereon. ❑ North arrow, scale, tocation map and date prepared. ❑ Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. ❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. ❑ Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. ❑ Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points of access. ❑ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and seawalls and any proposed utility easements. ❑ Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit. ❑ Location af solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection. ❑ Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406. ❑ Ail adjacent right�s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections and bus shelters. ❑ Dimensions of existing and proposed iot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. ❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and buifding materials. Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, F� 33756, Tel: 727-582-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01/12 ❑ Typical f�oor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. ❑ Demolition plan. ❑ Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. ❑ If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parki�g demand study will need to be provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information. ❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of al) existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying those trees proposed to be removed, if any. ❑ A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff. ❑ A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more of the following conditions: • Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the abutti�g streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable levels; or ■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or ■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors. ❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information, if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval: ❑ Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. ❑ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line. ❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. ❑ Location of existing a�d proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape. ❑ Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. ❑ Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations. ❑ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any. Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 01I12 LL ° � ��rwater U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WlTH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. SEEATTACHMENT "C" 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed devetopment will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The praposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, �Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: T27-562-4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12 LL ° � earwater U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(5) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAII, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). SEE ATTACKMENT "D" 1. � 3. 4. 6. 8. Planning 8� Developmen4 Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 7 of 8 Rsvised 01/12 . � . � � Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application �-�-� Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative :. Prp�iCe names of ail proper;y owners on deed - PRINT t��l names: Derade GuijCvost Nntet Paitnrrs, LP JefJKeierleber, Pnrtner 2. Tha� (I am/we are) the owneris) and record titie holoer(s} af ;he foilowing �escribed aropeRy: thvner 3. That thas �roper,y canstitutes the properLy for which a reques, for (describ� requestj: Constrrorction nf n Hotel. prtrking areas/garages und associated uti/irie�. 4. Tha� :he underzigned ihasfhave) appointed and �does/do) appaint: Svner,�� fivif Engineering, /nc /:Nichae! J. Palmer), Jue Burde7te, tsn�an Peterarrrr lordan behar as {his/:heir� agent{s) *o execu;e any petitions or other documenn necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to indc:ce the Ciiy af Clearwater, Flarida to consider and ar, on the above described property; 6, Tfiat sfte�,vis�ts <o :he propery �re necessary by City representatives in order ;o process ihis applitatior and the owner a�thon�es iity r�presentatrves *o visit and Fhotogtapn 'he proper.y eescribed in this application; 7. That {I,(we), the u�c�ersigned aujhorlty, hereby certify tha? ;he foregoing is true �nd correc:. r� 1 ! - �'' � :� :1 A��=`�:-��-- P"aP��Y ��e� Property Owner Pr�perry �wner Property Own�r STAT£ QF Fl.ORIDA, COUNTY OF I'1NELLAS SEFORE ME TriE UNDERSIGNED. AN OFFICER �ULY COMMISSIONED SY T;-iE LAWS OF THE St,aTE OF FIQRIDA. ON s k- �`� ., THIS �� OAY OF _ T% t- �C.; �� '�U� � PERSdNALLY APPEARED ��-� C t`'� y�`i,'� �'� [' �'� ��@ tr WHQ HAVI�IG $E�EiV FIRSi pUIY SWORN ; DEPOSED ANQ SAYS il-IA i NE/SHE FUILY U�IDERSTANDS ?}1E CONTENTS OF TNE AFFIDAVIT TSiAT HEiSHE SiGNED .' _ _. , ,''^� � "�':'� - j �� ♦ '.� 1 � '4� • :�.. . '�'��+x �` � ' � _-��_._.._, . r: . _.__.__ . m.. ,._._ � t' . ;� �lotary Public SFgrature 41y Commiss�on Exp�res ls.t?�--�t m�..; �~� ,.� C�,�_� �._�. X Planning 8 Develqpment Oepartment, 100 8. MIyr31e Avenue. Clearvrater. Fl 33756. Te1: 72'i•382-i363: F�: T27•562-488b Page 8 of 8 fiavi�ed 01112 ° �arwater �� U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 SUBMIT ORIGINALSIGNED AND NOTARIZEDAPPLICATION SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded iMo sets CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECENED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APP�ICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPIICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 04/24/2007) �PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT� APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATtON: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELI NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on Uie deed AGENT NAME: MAiIING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Decade Gulfcoast Hotel Partners 13555 Bishops Ct Suite 345 Brookfield, WI 53005-6218 (262)797-9215 Decade Gulfcoast Hotel Partners FAX NUMBER: EMai�: Jkeier@decadegroup.com Michael J. Palmer, P.E. w/ Synergy Civil Engineering, Inc. 3000 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Suite 201 Clearwater, �2�-a�a� saa 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: FAX NUMBER: EMAIL: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shail be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping othervvise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. Both the design and character are considerable more attractive than required under the minimum code standards. Medjool Date Palms are proposed in planters along South Gulfview Boulevard to enhance the streetscape. Due to the site's proximity to the Gulf of Mexico, no shade trees are being proposed (high salt exposure). In lieu of shade trees, palm and accenttrees which have high salt tolerance are being proposed. The plant palette for the proposed landscape will blend nicely with the existing landscape on site. C:IDocuments and Settingslderiek.fe�usonlDesktoplplanningfnrms 070TComprehensive Landscape Program 0424-07.doc Page 1 of 2 2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program wili enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 3. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a benefiaai impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcet proposed for development. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed fo� development is located. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHIChi SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE 1NFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authori City representatives visit and photograp prope escri i li . , .. t ' � - -� �` �- -- Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELI,�$ Swor to and subscribed before me this .1V��-day of r , A.D. 20 to me and/or by r wh 's personalty known has produced U as identifi atQn. . . Nota public, My commission expirp�� _ _ _ MY COMMIS$ION N EE 088439 EXPIRES: June 28, 2015 Bonded firu Nota�y Pub�C UrMervrtiters C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplp/anningfnrms 07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 0424-07.doc Page 2 of 2 0 ! 521 Gulfview: The Entrada E't'��_,-� �)�.�t'€�i�i��tw' �tttti [�t�t(�te,* The existing Holiday Inn has been a guest favorite for years, with breathtaking views, comfortable accommodations, swimming pool and a restaurant. Decade Gulf Coast Hotel Partners requests the construction of a new limited services hotel building which will add 125 overnight accommodation units, discrete enclosed parking, improved curb appeal, and landscaping. The property will include a waterslide, retail space, banquet facility, meeting space and a roof top bar. The new building will complement the surrounding buildings in color, height and architectural style. Pedestrians will be welcomed with attractive outdoor seating, and enhanced landscape areas. The goals of Beach by Design for the Clearwater Pass District call for just such revitalization which will add to the overall improvements of Clearwater Beach as a whole. The site is 4.87 acres, and currently consists of 189 overnight accommodations and 204 parking spaces. The proposed accessory building will add 125 overnight accommodations for a total of 314 rooms. There will be no residential units on site. Parking will be increased to 407 with the addition of an enclosed parking garage. The project will bring landscaping to current code and create a more attractive walk- able streetscape. ��}��e ,r;��[ic�;�r��t r-er.��=�,t� ks3�_� ?e�!(u��it��;; • Approval to construct a new 125 limited service hotel adjacent to the existing 189 unit building; • An increase in building height from 35' to 98.67' above base flood; • A two year development agreement with option to renew; and • Fulfill the shade tree requirement solely with palm and understory trees as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of 3-1202.G. s:��r�,sl E)��:i __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ___ __ _ _ __... _ _ Ag��tC' Synef gy Ciyil EngFneering, Irc. ;t4lichaei 1. Pa�mer, P E.l, Joe 84rd��t�, 1st��3n Pe*er�retz, anci Jorcfan Sehar _____,_ _....._ _ _._._._ ._._______.__,.�_._ ._..__,_�_.___..�.._._��._....____�___________.� _____ ___._ ___�._.___.. Appiicant/Owner: Decade Gulf Coast Hotel Partners, LP and 1,K. Gulfvievu LLC �JC3t;i};'� Property Size: F�ture L��d U�e P;an. Zoning: 4.87 Acres TOUftSi UISLfICt (T} Sf�ec�.3� Ar��,� Plari - . � � - � � Adjacent 2aning: Tourist District (T; & OS%R _ ._ __. _. __ _ . _ _ _ ___ _._. _ � �.�.,�...� �..�.�.,K��.��„ �,�.��,.�.��,,��,�..�.a.�,�, .��.u��,��,�. -�..�..,�,.�.�,,.��., � .e.,..,��.�.�.� ' tx:1+�r}g ta�,:1 lise. _ , , . ..,-: _ ,_., �ti�I:L`,I`. The subject property consists of 4.87 acres and is located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard, between Hamden Drive and Bayway Boulevard. The property is currently a Holiday Inn with 189 overnight accommodations, 204 parking spaces, an accessory wave runner and parasail business, retail sales, restaurant, conference and office space. The existing hotel sits on east side of the lot, with parking to the west. The property is located in the Tourist Zoning District, (T) and Open Space/Recreation (OS/R). The Upland Area consists of 170,242.715F or 3.908 acres; the submerged area consists of 41,905.29 SF or 0.962 acres. Total site area is 212,148.00 or 4.87 acres. The required impervious surface ratio is (ISR) =0.95. The allowable imperious area is 161,730.575 SF, and the required green area is 8,512,136 SF. Its future land use designation is Resort Facilities High "RFH". The property is located in the Clearwater Pass section of Beach by Design. The Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL} ends at the northwest property corner see survey map for exact location. The immediate area is characterized by primarily other overnight accommodations, condominiums, retail, outdoor recreation and entertainment. The City's Beach Walk project has been constructed transforming South Gulfview Boulevard to the north of this site into a winding beachside promenade with lush landscaping, artistic touches and clear views to Clearwater's award-winning beach and the water beyond. ��irt� �ii3t43rti� Development Order (FLD2007-03008) approved a mixed use 189 unit overnight accommodation use, (hotel), accessory wave runner business, restaurant, office and 77 attached dwellings on January 18, 2005 with a deviation to the required stacking spaces at the driveways, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803-C. Building permits were issued to remodel the existing hotel, reducing the number of rooms from 289 to 189. On January 18, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDBj approved with 14 conditions, a Flexible Development application for the subject property for the Termination of Status of a Nonconformity for density (existing 289 rooms/units overnight accommodation use-to be converted into 241 rooms/units overnight accommodation use and 36 dwelling units), to permit a mixed use (241 room/unit overnight accommodation use (including accessory restaurant, retail sales and wave runner business), 38 attached dwellings, a restaurant and an office use) and for the Transfer of Development rights for two dwelling units from 850 Bayway Boulevard (FLD2004-04025/TDR2004-09011) Development Order (FLD2007-03008) was issued to Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. as agent on May 16, 2007. The board reviewed and approved the Flexible Development Application with conditions. While renovations were made to the existing property, due to the downturn in the economy, construction of the second building did not commence. The development order remains current. � .,�x , s��,s.� ��,��.�.� �m,�.,�.� .�a.�:.�.�.��.�.�a...,. ��.,�.��,..,.,.�.r�.,� r�M�� .,...�.�.�.r��w..�,�.�a,��,..��,,�� z...,...�. ,...�� Dev�tapnient Proposal The proposal is to construct 125 limited service overnight accommodations. Parking will be provided under the new building. The proposed building will feature traditional architecture with an Andalusia flair which complements the existing architecture and that of neighboring buildings. The color palate will be in keeping with Beach by Design criteria. Amenities will include the existing swimming pool, an indoor/outdoor cafe, and a specialty slide. The design carefully considers Beach by Design and the project's compatibility with its surroundings. The project's metrics fall within the Flexible Development Application, Community Development Code and Beach by Design guidelines. There will be no rental units on the site. Special Area Ptan: Clearwater Pass District The area to the south and east of the Beach and Small Hotel Districts is distinctively eclectic with high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation, and small retail establishments. Beach by Design anticipates the Clearwater Pass District be an area of strategic revitalization and renovation lead by improving conditions on the rest of the Beach. The City has demonstrated through the creation of Beach by Design and subsequent amendments to the plan that it recognizes the need for pedestrian friendly development in order to create a vibrant attractive resort and waterfront destination serving tourists and locals alike. It is understood that a broad range of uses contribute to the creation of the unique character and atmosphere of Clearwater Beach. While Beach by Design contemplates the challenges of infill development, the eclectic nature of the uses and architecture and the lack of off street parking, development projects such as this help create visual continuity, provide much needed off street parking, and improve curb appeal with improved landscaping. Beach by Design ��►�h i�� I)e�3;;►� 5��,titas�� t[ f�c�5t�;i7 ��r.i��id=tir��-� The project will consist of 125 overnight accommodations, (see Exhibit F). The building height is proposed to be 98.67" to the top of the roof, and 113/ to the top of inechanical, stair and elevator runs. Maximum building height for Beach by Design is 150'. The proposed height is harmonious with the varied heights of buildings surrounding the subject property. The design has incorporated step backs on all faces of the building to provide the visual interest encouraged by Beach by Design. The proposed building is designed to complement the existing Holiday Inn, thus the facades are composed of decorative pilasters and arches. Colonnades accent the design along with barrel tiled roofs. v��,�,z,�. � ��.,,�� ,�.��.�. �,�. .�..�.�;�x�.�,��m �..,� ri��,��...��.�.� .,� .�.��,_.� The proposed building setbacks meet the requirements of the Development code for the districts and provide for fire and maintenance access at the rear of the property. Side setbacks are set at 15' and a 20.5' to structure setback from the existing seawall. All of the project's parking will be concealed in an enclosed parking garage. On the street level, parking will be masked with decorative windows featuring metal grillwork. The fourth and fifth floors of the parking level will appear as building spandrels of similar design to the balconies and windows of the residential portion of the building. The landscaping at the front of the building incorporates lush palms a stepped seating area, bicycle racks, decorative lighting and trash receptacles. The color palate is the old Florida Flagler style which includes pastels and white trim. Flexible D�velopment Standarcis The development has been designed within the Flexible Development Standards, including height, scale, bulk, parking, and signage. No reductions in setbacks are being requested. No reduction in parking is being requested. And the proposed accessory use is less than the maximum 15%. No requests from the Density Reserve are being requested, (see Exhibit F, Attached). Comprehensiv� Plan The proposal is supported by applicable various Goals, Objectives and/or Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan as Follows: Future Land Use Plan Element • Policy a.1.2.1.-The City shall require new or redeveloped overnight accommodations uses located within the City's coastal storm area to have a hurricane evacuation plan, approved by the City for all guest. This plan shall require the commencement of evacuation of hotel guest as soon as a hurricane watch is posted for the City. • Policy A.3.2.1 All new development or redevelopment i)��=�;i�;�� sttii«�I.7t�cf�� (:�7r�tr�i��nit�� 1=)z��tr��t��et�tt [:c�c1�� Community Development Code Section 2-801.1 "The Tourist District may be located in more than one land use category. It is the intent of the T district that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by state law. The uses and developrnent potential of a parcel of land within the T district shall be determined by the standards found in the Development Code as well as the County Wide Future Land Use Designation of the property, including any acreage or floor area restrictions set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of the County wide Future Land use Plan, as amended from time to time. For those parcels within the T District that have an area within the boundaries of and governed by a special area plan approved by the city council and the countywide planning authority, maximum development potential shall be set forth for each classification of use and location in the approved plan..." (See r��.�,< �w,:_�,ri,�w�,� �.�,,ti,�� ,,.�.,., �s��,�. ..u„ ��,w,.�x�,.-�,��.w,..._a.�. .,r�.�.�...��, .ux.,z.�.��,��,.ur..m ...... .......�.w,, '� � table)...or as set forth in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, the special area plan governing Clearwater Beach adopted by Ord. No 6689-01 and as amended. Section 3-501 Tourist District. "The design guidelines in the Tourist District located within the boundaries governed by Beach by Design are hereby incorporated by reference. (Ord. No. 6690-018.4-5-01) Ecc��tur��ic [�a��a�t The Entrada will have considerable positive economic impacts to the community including providing a variety of employment and entrepreneurial opportunities for local residents, as well as fiscal, indirect and induced economic opportunities for the community. Properties such as the Entrada are known to have a strong, positive effect on the local and regional economies. This brief assessment provides a summary of economic impacts and projections as to how such a project could favorably enhance the economy of Clearwater and progress its redevelopment plans for Clearwater Beach. It is anticipated that the Entrada will add approximately 126 new employees. Hotels provide both short and long term increases to the local economy. Short term direct impacts include all revenues from construction including building materials, payroll, professional services and service contracts. Long term direct impact sources of revenue includes room, food and beverage sales, restaurant and banquet services, spa services, retail and parking revenues and payrolt. Fiscal impacts include federal, state and local taxes from development, and operation of the hotel including property taxes and lodging taxes. Indirect impacts include local governments, hotel owners, employees, contractor suppliers, restaurant suppliers, laundry vendors, telecommunication vendors, utility companies, and food and beverage suppliers. Induced impacts are generated when employees, both full time and temporary spend their wages on local consumer purchases. Canclusion The beauty of Clearwater beach makes it a popular destination for visitors and residents. The City has created a master plan to guide the redevelopment process, preserving the beauty of the natural resources while creating districts that enhance the experience of visitors. Entrada at 521 5. Gulfview is designed to incorporate the Beach by Design vision with a pedestrian friendly destination, innovative architecture, breathtaking views and visual variety. The development metrics are well within Beach by Design, Flexible Standard guidelines and Community Development standards. �....�..,�� ,�..�,....��..�...��.r� ..��.�.,.,��,.�,�,g.��A..,.,�� ,,��,�a..� �.�,.,�....�n��.�..,��.,.� a ..�.x�,��.w a< .,.� s,�..� ,�..�.r,�. 521 South Gulfview Blvd. � 2013 ATTACHMENT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Description: (as furnishedj A survey of a parcel of land in Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, further described as follows: From the Northwesterly corner of Lot I, Block C of Bayside Subdivision No. 5 as recorded in Plat Book 38, Page 38 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence run North 54 deg. 25' 30" West 65.14 feet along the Southerly line of Gulfview Boulevard for a Point of Beginning; thence continue North 54 deg. 25' 30" West along said Southerly line of Gulfview Boulevard, 467.74 feet to the Northeasterly corner of Lot 43 in Lloyd- White-Skinner Subdivision as recorded Plat Book 13, Page 12 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence run South 35 deg. 34' 30" West 400.00 feet to the bulkhead line; thence South 54 deg. 25' 30" East 316.13 feet; thence along a curve to the left, radius 534.30 feet, arc 213.63 feet, chord bearing South 65 deg. 52' 45" East, chord 212.21 feet; thence South 77 deg. 20' 00" East 87.38 feet; thence North 12 deg. 40' 00" East 351.56 feet to the Point of Beginning. Prepared By: Suncoast land Surveying, Inc. 111 Forest Lakes Boulevard Oldsmar, Fla. 34677 Ph: (813) 854-1342 fax: (813) 855-6890 � 521 South Gulfview EXHIBIT B: Description of Request • Approval to construct a new 125 limited service hotel adjacent to the existing 189 unit building; • An increase in building height from 35' to 98.67' above base flood; • A two year development agreement with option to renew; and • Fulfill the shade tree requirement solely with palm and understory trees as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of 3-1202.G. Exhibit C: Flexible De�elopment Application General Applicability Criteria 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The Entrada located at 521 South Gulfview Boulevard, currently consists of 189 overnight accommodations and 204 parking spaces. The Owner requests approval to construct an accessory structure which will add 125 limited service hotel units, parking garage, and the improvement of curb appeal, and landscaping of the property. The additional rooms bring the property total to 314 overnight accommodations and increase parking spaces to 407. The building height is at 98.67' above grade which is within the guidelines 50' below the maximum guidelines. The building design is compatible in architectural detail with the existing building. The new building will complement the surrounding buildings in color, height, bulk and architectural style. The property is located in the Clearwater Pass District which consists of similar uses along with residential (condominiums) retail and restaurants, outdoor recreation and entertainment, restaurant and attached dwelling units. The 440-450 West attached dwelling condominium towers are located to the north of the subject property, and each tower is 157 feet in height The properties to the east are developed with retail sales and services and restaurant uses. The Cit�s Beach Walk project has been constructed transforming South Gulfview Boulevard to the north of this site into a winding beachside promenade with lush landscaping, artistic touches and clear views to Clearwater's beach. The project will bring landscaping to current code and create a more attractive streetscape. The immediate area is characterized by a variety of uses including overnight accommodation, reta 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The surrounding properties are fully developed; thus the subject would not hinder or discourage appropriate development or redevelopment The improvements will improve curb appeal; improve parking and the e�ciency of the subject property. Such improvements can only enhance the value of the subject property and those that surround it Several of the newly renovated properties are resort oriented with a variety of amenities for families, conventions and special events. The Entrada offers similar amenities addressing the tastes of today's visitors. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The building will be designed to meet all state, federal and local codes with respect to fire safety, potable water, sanitary sewer, traffic and pedestrian safety. The building maintains the existing use and does not introduce any new businesses that may adversely affect the health of persons residing or working in the area. The proposed structure will comply as required with applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Since the property is already an operaring hotel, it is not anticipated that the additional rooms will not significandy impact traffic. The results of a traffic study performed for this development indicates that the project will not cause significantly increased traffic congestion. The additional parking spaces will benefit the project, its guests and surrounding properties as it will provide more than the required number of spaces. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The properties immediately adjacent to the subject are similar in character, size and bulk. Redevelopment and new construction in the vicinity and along the beach. The subject property incorporates Mediterranean architecture offered in a neutral color palate which is similar and complementary to the properties to the east The properties to the north appear more contemporary, however due to the landscape and color palate, the subject complements its surroundings. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The building includes enhanced design elements on the fasade as required by Beach by Design including adequate windows, vertical and horizontal plane changes and the recommended color palette. The acoustic and olfactory impacts are minimized by providing all of the parking within an enclosed parking garage. Hours of operation will be 24/7 which is consistent with surrounding properties catering to the tourist industry. r 521 Gulfview Blvd. � ��3 Attachment D Applicable Flexibility Criteria 1. With the exception of those properties located on Ctearwater Beach, the parcel proposed for development sha(1 front on but shall not involve direct access to a major arterial street unless no other rneans of access would be possible. RESPONSE: The project is located on Clearwater Beach and will utilize and existing driveway entrance into the proposed parking garage from South Gulfview Blvd. 2. Height: The increased height resutts in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance. RESPONSE: The proposed height of 98'-8" above base flood elevation is within the range allowed within the ("Tourist District 35' to 100') and is compatible with surrounding buildings. The proposed building will replace a vacant parking lot that currently contains no landscaping. The new building will create continuity with respect to surrounding building heights and will add landscaping and beach by design architectural building features. 3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than siac feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign program. RESPONSE: A corraprehensive sign program will be submitted for approval as a separate package addressing signage locations, height and size. 4. Front Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life. RESPONSE: No reduction in required setbacks is being requested. b. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved buitding design and appearance. � Final 10-30-13 521 Gulfview Blvd. � 2�13 RESPONSE: No reduction in required setbacks is being requested. c. The reduced setback will not resutt in the loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. RESPONSE: No reduction in required setbacks is being requested. 5. Side and Rear Setbacks a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles and/or personnel. RESPONSE: No reduction in required setbacks is being requested. b. The reduced setback results in an improved site ptan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance. RESPONSE No reduction in required setbacks is being requested. e. The reduction in side and rear setbacks does not reduce the amount of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. RESPONSE: No reduction in required side & rear setbacks is being requested. 6. Off-street parking: a. b. The proposed development contains no more than 130 rooms; and The proposed development is within 1,000 feet of an existing public parking garage with documented available capacity. RESPONSE: ? Final 10-30-13 521 Guifview BIvd.12�13 No reduction in required parking is being requested. The project will be designed with a parking ratio of l.2 spaces per room. 7. The design of all buildings shall comply with the Tourist District site and architectural design guidelines in Section 3-501, as applicable; RESPONSE: SEE EXHIBIT "E" BEACH BY DESIGN CRITERIA) 8. Lot area and/or width: The reduction shall not result in a buitding which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity; RESPONSE: No reductio� in required in lot area/ width is being requested. 9. The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area, have a hnrricane evacuation plan requiring the use close when a hurricane watch is posted; and RESPONSE: A hurricane evacuation plan will be provided prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 10. A development agreement must be approved by the city counci( pursuant to F.S. §§ 163.3221-163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the devetopment proposal exceeds the base density and/or base F.A.R. established for the underlying Future Land Use designation. The development agreement shall: RESPONSE: No development agreement is being requested. a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to alternative density/intensity, and as amended from time to time; b. � Final 10-30-13 521 Gulfview Bivd. � 2�013 Be recorded with the clerk of the circuit court pursuant to F.S. § 163.3239, with a copy filed with the property appraiser's office, and a copy submitted to the PPC and CPA for receipt and filing within 14 days after recording; and c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which shall be recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County prior to the issuance of any building permit for the overnight accommodations use. 11. Accessory Uses: a. Accessory uses must be incidental, subordinate, and customarily accessory to overnight accommodations; b. The following shall apply to required parking for accessory uses: i. Accessory uses located within the building interior may occupy between 15 percent and 20 percent of the gross floor area of the development, but only when additional parking is provided for that portion of the accessory uses which exceeds 15 percent. The required amount of parking shall be calculated by using the minimum off-street parking development standard for the most intensive accessory use(s). Where there is a range of parking standards, the lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calcutate the additional amount of off-street parking required for the project. In projects where the interior accessory uses exceed 20 percent of the building gross floor area, all interior accessory uses shall be considered additional primary uses for purposes of calculating development potential and parking requirements. ii. Regardless of the gross floor area percentage, overnight accommodations with fewer than 50 rooms that have a full service restaurant shall comply with the parking standards for the restaurant use as contained in Table 2-803. The lowest number of spaces allowed shall be used to calcutate the additional amount of off-street parking required for the restaurant; c. In addition to the requirements above, for those projects that request additional rooms from the Hotet Density Reserve established in Beach by Design and whose interior accessory uses are between ten percent and 15 percent of the gross floor area of t6e proposed building, density shall be calculated as follows: RESPONSE: Proposed accessory use is less than 15% and will meeting the ratio of 1.2 spaces per hotel room, i. Catculate the maximum number of units allowed by the base density; ii. � � Final 10-30-13 521 Gulfview Blvd. � 2�13 Calculate the maximum number of units that may be allocated from the Hotel Density Reserve established in Beach by Design; III. Add the figures determined in i. and ii. to determine the total number of units allowed for the site; iv. Divide the total number of units allowed, as calculated in iii., by the total land area to determine the resulting units per acre for the project site; v. Determine the total floor area of all interior accessory uses exceeding ten percent of the gross floor area of the proposed building; vi. Subtract the figure determined in v. from the total tand area, and divide this difference by 43,560 to determine the net acreage; vii. Multiply the net acreage derived in vi. by the applicable resulting units per acre figure determined in iv. The resulting product is the maximum number of rooms atlowabte for the project. viii. The fmal allocation of rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve shall be determined by multiplying the net acreage determined in vi. by the base density and subtracting this product from the maximum number of rooms allowable for the project as determined in vii. RESPONSE: (SEE EXHIBIT "F "City of Clearwater's Legal Determination of Allowable Density) d. Signage for any accessory use shall be subordinate to and incorporated into the primary freestanding signage for the overnight accommodation use. In no case shall more than 25 percent of the sign area be dedicated to the accessory uses; RESPONSE: Acknowledged e. Those developments that have obtained additional density from the Destination Resort Density Pool established in Beach by Design are not subject to the requirements set forth in Sections 2-803.I.11.a—d. RESPONSE: Not Applicable j Final 10-30-13 2013 FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIPANNUAL REPORT DOCUMENT# A960000016Q1 Entity Name: DECADE GULFCOAST HOTEL PARTNERS LIMiTED PARTNERSHIP Current Principal Place of Business: 521 GULFVIEW BLVD. CLEARWATER FL 33767 Current Mailing Add�ess: 13555 BISHOPS COURT SUITE 345 BROOKFIELD, WI 53005 FEI Number: 59-3399884 Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: C T CORPORATION SYSTEM 1200 SOUTH PINE ISLAND ROAD PLANTATION, FL 33324 US FILED Apr 25, 2013 Secretary of State Certificate of Status Desired: No The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered offrce or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Generai Partner Detail Detail : Document # H34627 Name J K INVESTMENTS OF CLEARWATER, INC. Address 240 BAYSIDE DRIVE City-State-Zip: CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767-2503 I heraby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplementat report is true and accurate and lhat my electronic signature sha/l have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that ! am a general partner of the limded partnership or the raceiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 62Q Flonda Statutes; and that my name appea�s above, or on an attachment with all other7ike empowered. SIGNATURE: /S/ MICHAEL SWEET S 04/25/2013 Electronic Signature of Signing General Partner Detail Date Q3-36893D RUG-29-2003 2:57pM PENELLRB CQ BK 13Q28 PG i722 i)�� m� ��iu �i u� �i� r� iu� �cf�Y ��v�uv To: j`fl3 !ao �Fust Amcrican 'Titic 7ns, Co. 13�Q0 US 191�I, Suitc 13S Cleanvater, FL 337G3 `�' This Instrument re ared b• P P Y• William H. Diamond DeCampo, Diamond & Ash 80S Third Avenue, Sucth Floor New Yoric, New York 10022 � l'\ o �.� ti a,.,,,..�; ,� .,.:.._t..�,.�,..,,..,t �� Mary Neese FertI, Esq. Quarles & Brady LLP 411 East Wiscansin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53�02 ��,[� �� ; --G=,.g v� '� �� - cHC ,a�sr — Gs: A�ff ��_�- �-- �� a�,g �. �Q c�tr _ FEfiS KA� F. DE �.A#(fR`, �f ERi( E� �f �I�Li�fi t�€fY: FL�I�F C'�?) 4�-�9 �43. �-�-21�}3 �4:57:�5 1�1 51 Dm-JK GIQ.f�tIE� LLC I0011� I#;0�68930 �(:1.3a�8 �G.�7� EPG:f'�3 (�CORDI�+G 002 PAf� 1'� ', �10.5p � 5Tt� - �1� ,- - - - 3 '� ', �:44�.I0 �� t�: ��4J2.bD (�f �. t #94t452,�} _ � �.� $q � _- - ; �'� i(�! �. I�',BE�: E�ERS( � !�f _ -��1-�l�A,S i1LI�}'f,� fl.DRIDA E'�7) 464-3QOB _,. , ,� - A1TF � � �O� �-�J'�I� I�:�.�.� t� � �� .� � �.��#�-D� 1�F�' 3�E.IE� � �� .�o TDT�: � � CI�ECI( �.t�D�D: `, . . � - , (�fAi�: �PECIAL WARRAI�Y,��p� � �r � � , ,� ,_ , , THIS SPECIAL WARR�N'T�t DEED mad� as-of the� day of August, 2003 by AGH PSS I, INC., a Delaware corpc�ratio� �whose t�iaiIing address is �501 North Fairfax Ikive, Arlingto;a, Virginia 22203, hereiqxf�er,�allec� t�i,c Grantor, to (a} DECADE GULFCOAST H�TEL PARTNERS LIMI�'FD' ��'x�,RTN�.RSHIP, a Florida. lunited partnership whose mailing address is NI9 W24Z30 Riyerwgqd Drive, Suite 100, Waukeshx, WI 5318$ and whose Tax I.D. Number is 59-339�$�4 a� to an Llzriiivided 84% tenancy-in-common interest and (b) JK GULFVIEW LLC, a Fis�rid`a��iia�ii.ted liability company whose maiFing address is Ni9�W24134 Rivcrwood Drivc, Syiif� 140,�j�Van�Zesha, WI 53188and whose Tax I.D. number is� as to an undivided 16arb; L�aaacy-in-common interest, snch entities being hereinaRer col�ectively called the Grantoe �{v�tlter��rer used hereunder the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to thi� ,instcucnen�t a��b the heirs, legal representafives and assigns of individuals, and thc successors x#$ assigns o�'corporations, Iimited partnerships and timited liabiiity companies): „ ,, ,' , , `K�°'F�E�3�"I'�i: That the Grantor, for and in considera.tion of Ehe sum of Ten ($1 Q.00} DOitarg and_�t�ier valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby ,graziEs; bargaias;'se11s, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and conf'ums unto the grantee, all chat �ertain �d siivate in PineIlas County, Florida, described as fallows: �, . �� ; A survey and tie-in of a parcel af lartd in Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 15 E, , - � fiuther descnbed as foilows: From the Narthwester[y corusr of Lot I, Blocic C of Bayside 5ubdivision No. 5 as recorded ia Piat Book 38, Page 38 of khe PubIic Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence nxn Narth 54 deg. ZS'30" West 6S.i4 feet along the Southerly line of Gulfview Bouleva.rd for a Point of Beginning; thence continue North 54 deg. 2S'30" West along sazd Southeriy line of Gulfview Boulevard, 467.74 feet to the Northeasterty corner af Lot 43 in LIoyd-White-Skinner Subdivision as recorded Plat Book 13, Page 12 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence run South 35 deg. 34'30" West 400.00 feet to �.� �`+_�(? �.00 R - PINELLRS COUNTY FLA. DFF,REC.BK 13D28 PG 1723 the bulkhead line; thence South S4 deg. ZS'3d" East 316.13 fee�; thence along a curve ta the left, radius 534.30 feet, arc 213.63 feet, chord bearing South 65 deg. 52'45" East, ,� chord 212.2i feet; thence South 77 deg. 20'QO° East 8738 feet; thence North 12 deg. ', �, 40'00" East 351.56 feet to the �'oint of Begiuning. '� ', ___ __ A.nd beiug ihe same land conveyed to Grantor by Special Warranty Deed dated Febrj�a�y, I2, 1998 and recarded in Official Record Book 999b i'age 1418 ,', � ;; � , SUBJECT T4 taxes for the year 2003 and subsec�uent years and those� certain'Rer�iitfed F�cceptians {as defined in Sectian 3.03 of that certain I'urchase and Sale Agreement dat�c� as of July 10, 2003 between Grantor, as seiler, and Decade Properties, Inc., as -p�r�ef�aser, as �g¢iended and as assigned to Grantee}. ,� ,' �' __-_ � � `, �� N�TE: Tax Falio Number of said reai pmperty is 17/29/15/OOC�bQ1220!(}2U0. TOGETHER, with alI the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto beIongng or in anywise apgertaining. �', TU HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fe� sunp� for�vez��' ,��_; . ,, Ai�iD the grantor hereby warrants the tfita to sai� �Iand and will defend the same against the Iacvful claims of a11 persans claiming by,-t�r,o�tgA,or r�lder the said grantor, except as set forth above, but not ofhezwise. ", � " ' ` ' , , , � , -, , IN WITNESS WHEREO�,.the� said gan,tc�r has set grantor's hand and seaI the day and year first above written. - - Signed, sealed and delivered' �: � , AGH PSS C., a Delaware corporation zn the presence of ' `� , f,. ' - -- ► c_c-i a,,._. �s,�'� �,�, , �, - � ;' , � Name: jJ�� !�1��,��,�' ��,.� � ',\, ''7+`�`••�',' Name: _ i�.•�,�\ �' � c� Q�N IGk. �OMI�b� bQ.%�'�t �t Y ��c[S. R Er'�.4�' } � ' ) ss.: �, �'.'CC}U�;�'E'Y OF ARLINGTON ) By: ame: � ce�", l LEs Titic:ChPe� C�joert�fr'nc� �e er The for oin instrument was ackn wle by uCe► �. �. ��S . as�l Delaware carporation, on behalf o� lhe corporation, NOt3I'jr me his � day of Auge�st, 20U3, �s,.�. of AGH PSS I, Inc, w,w,:,,,,�.� ,� onally kno o me. ,�•w ��;' " .� . � .. +�` ��d-��,,... � o ,' -�if :..r y�� E.. !r. i� � � . .C' _ '� 0 1l . ti j!j y�k- � �� - _ � � .- � K� � �= Q � � � - � =t y• �-` _ � �� - ' T 3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Suite 201 Clearwater, FL 33759 � (727)796-1926 www. synergyciviteng.com SYNE RGY Certificate of Authorization No. 27692 Civil Engineering, Inc. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Prepared For: Entrada Hotel Clearwater, Fl Approving Agencies: Southwest Fiorida Water Management District City of Clearwater Submitted: November 01, 2013 Revised: STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT PREPARED FOR: Decade Gulf Coast Hotel Partners, LP N 19 W 24130 Riverwood Drive, Suite 100 Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188 SUBMITTED BY: Synergy Civil Engineering, Inc. 3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Suite 201 Clearwater, FL 33759 November 01, 2013 \\\\\\\\\�aq�a��V1{I I11I I I IIINiI/ \\ G��,�L J. �?��r�b''«� ,�� "'�,�C E N�� \;� �r �� i : - xi � %��—�--� � C� . T Tk,,.- . Micha s•' `,'� �I"14 v. ////!/�///I � I I I I I I I 1111 � 1� 63743) SYNERGY 3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Suite 201 Clearwater, Florida 33759 p,��;�p��,;p Civil Engineering, Inc r. � � Table of Contents NARRATIVE A. Introduction B. Historic & Existing Conditions C. Proposed Conditions D. Conclusion EXHIBITS A. Location Map B. GIS Aerial Map — Historic Conditions C. USGS Map DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS • PONDS software under drain calculations SYNERGY 3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Suite 201 Ctearwater, Florida 33759 �+�,��,�� Civil Engineering, Inc I. NARRATIVE A. INTRODUCTION Decade Gulf Coast Hotel Partners, LP is proposing to construct a Hotel Buiiding with covered parking at 521 South Gulf View Drive; Parcel ID # 07-29-15-00000-220-0200) that will include a storm water treatment vault with storm water infrastructure beneath the covered parking area, landscaping, walkways and associated utility connections on a 4.82 Acres +/-parcel of land. Decade Gulf Coast Hotel Partners, LP will be the Operation and Maintenance Entity and it will be shown that the treatment requirements will satisfy the criteria for both the SWFWMD and the City of Clearwater. B. HISTORIC & EXISTING CONDITIONS The 4.87 acre site located 5215outh Gulf View Drive currently contains an existing Hotel Building, Conference Building and associated parking areas. The upland parcel area contains approximately 3.90 acres of land and the submerged parcel area contains approximately 0.96 acres of land. There is no existing storm water management system in place for storm water treatment. Storm water runoff from the site is directed towards the property boundaries and flows off site into the City of Clearwater street �ight of way and storm water system. There is also a storm inlet connected to a 15" RCP that directs storm water run-off from the parking area located at the north east side of the site into the Gulf of Mexico. The site does not contain existing wetlands or surface waters. SYN E RGY Civil Engineering, Inc 3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Suite 201 Clearwater, Florida 33759 ��ge 4 af 10 C. PROPOSED CONDITIONS Decade Gulf Coast Hotel Partners, LP is proposing to construct a Hotel Building with covered parking at 521 South Gulf View Drive; Parcel ID # 07-29-15-00000-220-0200) that will include a storm water treatment vault with storm water infrastructure beneath the covered parking area, landscaping, walkways and associated utility connections on a 4.82 Acres +/-parcel of land. The proposed impervious area is equal to the pre-development condition and starm water run- off will be treated and directed into the Gulf of Mexico (See Grading Plan Sheet for Treatment Volume Calculations). The vault will be design with a 6" under drain which will allow the treatment volume to draw down within 24 hours. A minimum of 96 L.F. of 6" perforated PVC pipe will be required to meet the draw down time (See Ponds Calculations). All roof drainage will be directed into the vault and a control structure will aliow overflow to be discharged into an existing 15 RCP that will discharge into the Gulf of Mexico. Closed Vautt: City of Clearwater: • Treatment Volume = 3/4" over the area of disturbance (Discharging into the Gulf of Mexico — OFWj. • Full treatment volume recovery within 24 hours — Modeled in PONDS V3.2. • Meet 6" Freeboard Requirement. SWFWMD: • Drainage Exemption D. CONCLUSION The stormwater management systems have been designed to meet the treatment requirements of the SWFWMD for a drainage exemptian and the treatment volume requirements of the City of Clearwater. SYNERGY 3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Suite 201 Clearwater, Florida 33759 p,��;p Civil Engineering, lnc Ii. EXHIBITS A. LOCATION MAP B. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH C. USGS MAP SYNERGY 3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Suite 201 Clearwater, Florida 33759 p��,��;p Civil Engineering, Inc A. LOCATION MAP � � � � � � �� °.;� �� < �� , x�,�. �, ° � ��; � �s� d G'} b jk' ..,.� z &r� aora Ra � �� Par# ��r;t�,� ;, t9 g�� €sk� � * "� �� :� "� �� ... � �� x' �� z � � � � � �� °� � �„ ,�---.. �,�s; %r+dY � C�t► Eata�sa ��rr+ ""�� psr�s i�Saaza Ekew �t ?"5go ,, � �i@HfVV'8k@t C�� D � �ry; �3a►� 8�uns ,�`; c�xe St fae;, Cc�urt sa st �y �;� „ � � � � � Ga3#► V�t+bw � Carlw! R� � � �t � Sun T� APsntlatm�r+t ! nA�w»b�r Ktrf �s SYNERGY 3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Suite 201 Clearwater, Florida 33759 p��p�� Civii Engineering, Inc B. AERIAL MAP - RECENT SYNERGY 3000 Guif to Bay Boulevard, Suite 201 Clearwater, Florida 33759 Page8of10 Civii Engineering, Inc C. U5GS MAP ,:. � ._ __ — -m_ -- ; , � __� y� � ; °' P� U ..� ,� :� � Cleatwcater $each _ : : �� _ . r r+� � . . y" T� �-,Y,M t'at� , � ` ` ,., � � . a „z �r �� ra�., __ �' �' � � � r� "�nt � �� F c�+ ` � - R � � � .p�;� : � ;:�: � i i 14 t` 7 } ti `ti� �.e��!l►t�, �.,t.-..��......._. _�._� �. '� ` \ :::�ti SYNERGY 3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Suite 201 Clearwater, Florida 33759 Page9of10 Civil Engineering, Inc SYIV E RGY Civil Engineering, Inc III. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 3000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Suite 201 Clearwater. Florida 33759 �� .� �� Job Information Job Name: Engineer: Date: Inaut Data PONDS Side/Bottom Drain Analysis For Filtration System Version 3.3.0032 Copyright 2008 Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Entrada Hotel Michael J. Palmer 10-30-13 Surface area at high water stage, [Atop}: Surface area at low water stage, [Abot]: Permeability of filter sand, [k]: Driving head at high water stage, (Htop]: Driving head at low water stage, [Hbot]: Drawdown time, (t]: Average flow path length, [Xo]: Exposed underdrain width, [Lo]: Slope of underdrain face, [S]: Factor of safety for analysis, [FS]: Percent drawdown for analysis, [P]: Background seepage rate, [Q]: Results Note Total length of side/bottom drain filter required: Total length of sidelbottom drain filter required to recover treatment volume only: Total length of side/bottom drain filter required to accomodate background seepage: Maximum flow rate through filter: Average flow rate through filter: Volume of water between Atop and Abot: Recovery (or treatment) volume: Recovery (or treatment) volume: Drain pipe diameter should be checked to insure that peak ftow can be accomodated. 2088 2088 130 2.84 1.50 1 2 160 .005 2 94 0001 95.39512 95.39512 2.60689E-06 153.4395 76.71976 20931.24 19675.36 6.037752E-02 ft2 ft2 ft/day ft ft days ft ft ?H : 1 V % gpm ft ft ft gpm / lin ft gpm / lin ft gallons gallons acre-ft Entrada Hotel 10-30-2013 15:51:55 Page 1 : _ �, 521 Gulfview Bivd. I 2013 Attachment E Beach by Design Criteria 521 Gulfview Bivd. a) Density: 125 Rooms (See Exhibit "F") b) Height & Separation: 100 Ft permissible in the "T" District. The aroposed desipn is 98.67' to top of roof and 113.67' to top of inechanical, stair, and e/evator overruns. A �4' penthouse heiQht. c) Design, Scale and Mass of Building: 1. Buildings with a footprint of greater than 5000 square feet or a single dimension of greater than one hundred (100) feet will be constructed so that no more than two (2) of the three (3) building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. For this purpose, equal in length means that the two lengths vary by less than forty (40%) of the shorter of the two (2) lengths. The horizontal plan measurements relate to the footprint of the building. In the proposed buildinQ, no more than two of the three dimensions are epual in len4th The three main buildinq dimensions varv bv Qreater than the prescribed 40%. 2. No plane of a building may continue uninterrupted for greater than one hundred linear feet (100'). For the purpose of this standard, interrupted means an offset of greater than five feet (5'). None of the proposed buildina alanes continue more than 100' without an offset of at least frve feet. P/ease see Sheet A2 1. At the _around /evel, the buildin4 is an open Veranda, overlookinq the Pass and water slide. The parkinq is shie/ded from the veranda. The outline of the buildin_q above, showinq the steppinq is shown as dashed. 1 Fina110-30-13 521 Gulfview Bivd. I 2013 3. At least sixty percent (60%) of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. For the purpose of this standard, an elevation is that portion of a building that is visible from a particular point outside the parcel proposed for development. Percenta4es of facade that consists of window or Architectura/ decoration: North (Entnr) : 80% West: 61 % South: 81 % East: * 76 % * The east e/evation is Qartiallv occluded bv the existin_q buildin4. The 76% excludes the covered portion of the east facade. Because of fire code issues the openinqs in the buildinq facade direct/v between the buildinqs has been kept to a minimum. P/ease see Sheet A2-13A 4. No more than sixty percent (60%) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above forty-five feet (45') will be occupied by a building. However, in those instances where an overnight accommodations use on less than 2.0 acres that has been allocated additional density via the Hotel Density Reserve, no more than seventy-five percent (75%) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above forty-five feet (45') may be occupied by a building unless the property is located between Gulfview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico, then no more than 70% may be occupied by a building. The proposed desiqn and existinq buildinQ, occupies 28% of the buildab/e volume (Over the entire site), above 45'. Please see Sheet A2-13B. This Exhibit provides a Graphic and calcu/ated determination of the proposed built envelope versus fhe theoretical maximum buildin_q envelope. 5. The height and mass of buildings will be co�related to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The proposed buildinq desiQn, p/acement and massina is related to the adiacent properties as well as to the public street. The buildin_q provides for a 15 foot setback to the public street and it presents a aredominantiv open and activated face to the public. The street face is hi_qhlv decorated and open, aresentinq a verv articu/ated face. The East facade, adiacent to the existinq buildinq on the site, is stil/ verv open, but is massed to feel included as part of the existin_q buildin_q. Also the adiacencv to the existinar buildin4 shields and minimizes the main bulk of the proposed buildina►. 2 Fina110-30-13 521 Gulfview Blvd. I 2013 To address the condominium to the west the main tower is shaQed as an "L" To the South, the massin_q is also minimized bv placinq the thinnest face of the tower on this side as well as reducinp the mass of the buildinq bv p/acin_q the open pool leve/ openin_q to the south. There are a/so rooms overlookinq the Pass on this face. 6. Buildings may be designed for a verticai or horizontal mix of permitting uses. This building is designed wholly as a Hote/ but does include space for a prospective retail / tenant space at the ground /evel. The proposed retail spaces fal/ within the 15% allowab/e accessory uses. The proposed buildinq is a Hotel, the desi_qn a/locates retail space on South Gulfview Bou/evard facade at _qround /eve/ as we/l as the primanr hotel entrance. d) Setbacks & Stepbacks: 1. Rights-of-way. The area between the building and the edge of the pavement as existing and planned should be sufficiently wide to create a pedestrian-friendly environment. The distances from structures to the edge of the right-of-way should be: To create a pedestrian friendlv environment the buildin_q is set back the required 15 feet. The sidewa/ks have been previouslv imaroved and we are proposin4 to add a paved and landscaped plaza at the front of the buildin_q. The plaza allows for seatinq, _qatherin_q and access to the tenant spaces and Hote/ entrance, and arovides for differentiation between the pedestrian realm and the vehicular Porte Cochere. 2. Side and Rear Setbacks Except for the setbacks set forth above, no side or rear setback lines are recommended, except as may be required to comply with the City's Fire Code. While no setbacks are required, to the west, this proposa/ provides for a 15 foot setback to the property line and a 90 foot setback to the beach access walk, and proposes a 28 foot rear setback, The proposed desipn provides for a 15' side setback and a 22 foot, to structure, setback from the seawall. 3 Fina110-30-13 521 Gulfview Blvd. I 2Q13 3. Coronado Drive Setbacks and Stepbacks. To reduce upper story massing along the street and ensure a human scale street environment, buildings using the hotel density reserve along Coronado Drive shall be constructed in accordance with the following: N/A: a. Buildings constructed with a front setback greater than or equal to ten feet (10') and less than fifteen feet (15') shall stepback at a height not more than twenty feet (20'). The required stepback/ setback ratio is one and one-half feet (1.5') for every one foot (1') reduction in setback in addition to the minimum stepback of fifteen feet (15'). N/A, b. Buildings constructed with a front setback of less than ten feet (10') shall provide a building stepback required stepback/ setback ratio is two and one-half feet (2.5') for every one foot (1') reduction in setback in addition to the minimum stepback of fifteen feet (15'). N/A c. To achieve upper story facade variety and articulation, additional stepbacks may be required. To avoid a monotonous streetscape, a building shall not replicate the stepback configuration of the neighboring buildings including those across rights-of-way. N/A d. Required stepbacks shall span a minimum of 75% of the building frontage width. N/A e) Street-Level Facades The human scale and aesthetic appeal of street-level facades, and their relationship to the sidewalk, are essential to a ,� Finall0-30-13 521 Gulfview Blvd. I 2013 pedestrian-friendly environment. Accordingly: 1. at least sixty percent (60%) of the street level facades of buildings used for nonresidential purposes which abut a public street or pedestrian access way, will be transparent. For the purpose of this standard: The aroQOSed street /evel facade of the buildinp is 80% transoarent. While the North buildinQ face is avaroximatelv 160 feet lona, 3/5ths are dedicated to retail fronta_ae and the remaininq 2/5ths is the Hote/ aorte cochere / vehicular entrance. a) street level facade means that portion of a building facade from ground level to a height of twelve feet � � 2') b) transparent means windows or doors that allow pedestrians to see into: i. the building, or ii. landscaped or hardscaped courtyard or plazas, where street level facades are set back at least fifteen feet (15') from the edge of the sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the facade is a landscaped or hardscaped courtyard As stated above, the commercia/ spaces and aarape arovide for direct phvsical and visual access to the buildin_q from the sidewa/k. There is a plaza with built in benches and planters aroQOSed for the vard area immediatelv frontin_q the commercial spaces and hote/ entrance. c) parking structures should utilize architectural details and design elements such a false recessed windows, arches, planter boxes, metal grillwork, etc. instead of transparent alternatives. When a parking garage abuts a public road or other public place, it will be designed such that the function of the building is not readily apparent except at points of ingress and egress. 2. Window coverings, and other opaque materials may cover no more than 10% of the area of any street-level window in a nonresidential building that fronts on a public right-of way. 5 Final 10-30-13 521 Gulfview Blvd. � 2013 No more than 10% of the openings and windows shall be covered by opaque materials. 3. Building entrances should be aesthetically inviting and easily identified. Goods for sale will not be displayed outside of a building, except as a permitted temporary use. This standard does not apply to outdoor food service establishments. The Hote/ entrance was brought to the street with and is within a two story archway. The entry is direct/y connected to the vehic/e entry / Porte Cochere with a glass wall overlooking the guest drop-off and cross access drive within the building, The pedestrian experience is enhanced by the retail storefronts with Bermuda shutter type awnings, a well differentiated building entrance and awnings over the !wo automobile entry bays. 4. Awnings and other structures that offer pedestrians cover from the elements are recommended. Awnings help define entryways and provide storefront identity to both pedestrians and drivers. The entire first f/oor is accented with Bermuda Shutter stv/e awninqs as wel! as the arcaded and recessed hotel entrance f� Parking Areas To create a well-defined and aesthetically appealing street boundary, all parking areas will be separated from public rights of way by a landscaped decorative wall, fence or other opaque landscape treatment of not less than three feet (3') and not more than three and one-half feet (3%2') in height. Surface parking areas that are visible from public streets or other public places will be landscaped such that the parking areas are defined more by their landscaping materials than their paved areas when viewed from adjacent property. The use of shade trees is encouraged in parking lots. However, care should be taken to choose trees that do not drop excessive amounts of leaves, flowers, or seeds on the vehicles below. Entrances to parking areas should be clearly marked in order to avoid confusion and minimize automobile-pedestrian conflicts. Attractive signage and changes to the texture of the road (such as pavers) are recommended. When a parking garage abuts a public road or other public place, it will be designed such that the function of the building is not readily apparent except at points of ingress and egress. ( Fina110-30-13 521 Gulfview Blvd. I 2013 All parkinq within the new aroposed buildinq is shie/ded from view. We shall Qrovide perimeter plantinp to shie/d and buffer the remaininq existina suriace parkinQ. g) Signage Signage is an important contributor to the overall character of a place. However, few general rules apply to signage. Generally, signage should be creative, unique, simple, and discrete. Blade signs, banners and sandwich boards should not be discouraged, but signs placed on the sidewalk should not obstruct pedestrian traffic. Al/ siQnaQe for the proiect will be as per code and submitted for review and permittin_q. h) Sidewalks Sidewalks along arterials and retail streets should be at least ten feet (10') in width. All sidewalks along arterials and retail streets will be landscaped with palm trees, spaced to a maximum of thirty-five feet (35') on centers, with "clear grey" of not less than eight feet (8'). Acceptable palm trees include sabal palms (sabal palmetto), medjool palms (phoenix dactylifera `medjool'), and canary island date palms (phoenix canariensis). Sidewalks along side streets will be landscaped with palms (clear trunk of not less than eight feet (8')) or shade trees, spaced at maximum intervals of thirty-five feet (35') on centers. Portions of required sidewalks may be improved for nonpedestrian purposes including outdoor dining and landscape material, provided that: 1. movement of pedestrians along the sidewalk is not obstructed; and 2. non-pedestrian improvements and uses are located on the street side of the sidewalk. Distinctive paving patterns should be used to separate permanent sidewalk cafe improvements from the pedestrian space on the sidewalk. To enhance pedestrian safety and calm traffic, distinctive paving should also be used to mark crosswalks. DESIGN RESPONSE: The existinq sidewalk alon_q South Gu/fview is 10' wide with street trees and decorative liqht po/es. The proposed entrance into the commercial 7 Fina110-30-13 521 Gulfview Blvd. I 2013 spaces will include enhanced landscapinq, brick paver court area and benches for pedestrians. i) Street Furniture and Bicycle Racks Street furniture, including benches and trash receptacles should be liberally placed along the sidewalks, at intervals no greater than thirty linear feet (30') of sidewalk. Bicycle racks should also be provided, especially near popular destinations, to promote transportation alternatives. Complicated bicycle rack systems should be avoided. The placement of street furniture and bicycle racks should not interrupt pedestrian traffic on the sidewalk. We are a/annin_a for a aedestrian friendlv forecourt at the front of the commercia/ and hote/ entrance. The court shall inc/ude seatinp heiQht ptanters and qrade walls, and bicvc/e racks. There are a/so two sets of Bicvcle racks planned for within the Porte Cochere, at the NW corner of the buildin_q. j) Street Lighting Street lighting should respond to the pedestrian-oriented nature of a tourist destination. In this context, it should balance the functional with the attractive — providing adequate light to vehicular traffic, while simultaneously creating intimate spaces along the sidewalks. Clearwater's historic lighting is an attractive, single-globe fi�ure atop a cast-iron pole. There is currentiv decorative street li_qhtin_q inplace a/onq South Gulfview Blvd. k) Fountains Fountains provide attractive focal points to public spaces and add natural elements to urban environments. They should be interesting, engaging and unique. While it is important not to overburden architectural creativity regarding fountains, they should meet at least the following standards in order to be a functional and attractive component of the public space: 1. They should be supplemented with street furniture such as benches and trash receptacles, and 2. They should have rims that are: g Fina110-30-13 521 Gulfview Blvd. I 2013 a. Tall enough to limit unsupervised access by small children, and b. Wide enough to permit seating. Fountains should be encouraged in landscaped and hardscaped courtyards and plazas. N/A L. Materials and Colors 1. Facades Finish materials and building colors will reflect Florida or coastal vernacular themes. All awnings should contain at least three (3) distinct colors. Bright colors will be limited to trims and other accents. Glass curtain walls are prohibited. The co/or palate of the buildinQ is proposed to be in the o/d F/orida "F/a_a/er" stvle, paste/s and white trims. P/ease see the buildin_q e%vations for specific stucco co/ors. 2. Sidewalks Sidewalks will be constructed of: a. Pavers; b. Patterned, distressed, or special aggregate concrete; or c. Other finished treatment that distinguishes the sidewalks from typical suburban concrete sidewalks. Materials should be chosen to minimize the cost and complexity of maintenance. The sidewa/ks and plaza are proposed to be of concrete pavers, in co/ors to coordinate with the buildina. 3. Street Furniture Street furniture will be constructed of low-maintenance materials, and will be in a color that is compatible with its surroundings. The street furniture, consistinar of seatinq heiqht alanters and site walls, shall be stucco, coordinatinq with the buildinq co/ors.: 9 Fina110-30-13 521 Gulfview Blvd. I 2013 4. Color Palette A recommended palette for building colors is presented on the following page. As mentioned above, the stucco co/ors proposed for the buildinQ shall be "Old Florida" pastel colors, compatib/e with the beach vernacular.: � o Final 10-30-13 . . � x 521 South Gulfview Exhibit F From: Joe Burdette [mailto:hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 3:28 PM To: 'nina@comunitydevconcepts.com' Cc: 'Michael J. Palmer'; 'Istvan Peteranecz' Subject: FW: A04-01420: Development Order Validity: 521 S. Gulfview All Please see the email below that I received from Michael Delk following the city attorney's review of our termination of non-conformity for the units that we are now requesting for the new project. Michael clearly states we have a valid Development Order (which is for 189 hotel units and 75 condos which we are not converting to 125 hotel rooms). From: michael.delkCu�MyClearwater.com [mailto:michael.delkCa�MyClearwater.com] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 4:34 PM To: hunraf@aol.com Subject: FW: A04-01420: Development Order Validity: 521 S. Gulfview FYI. We appear to have reached a legally consistent conclusion that the project may move forward based on the retention of a valid DO . Have a good weekend. i�i1t:J Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning and Development Director City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Clearwater, FL 33756 P.O. Box 4748, 33758-4748 727-562-4561 727-562-4865 (fax) From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 4:28 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: A04-01420: Development Order Validity: 521 S. Gulfview I have reviewed the information contained in the above Request for Legal Services as well as the following: -Current and former versions of Community Development Code Section 6-109; -Development Orders dated 1/20/05 [FLD2004-04025/TDR2004-09011], 12/28/05 [same case numbers], and 5/16/07 [FLD2007-03008]; -Correspondence dated 4/5/06 concerning FLD2004-04025/TDR2004-09011; -Emails between Planning and Mr. Burdette concerning the development approvals. In my opinion it would be a reasonable legal position to take that the new construction for overnight accommodations may proceed to permitting based upon the continued validity of the Development Order(s) approving the original units and the reiteration of such approval in FLD2007-03008. I am assuming that the 77-unit figure representing the approved attached dwelling units is the correct number. Mr. Burdette mentions that those 77 units translate into 128 overnight accommodation units. I cannot confirm that figure at this time; however, Planning should use normal calculation procedures to determine the appropriate number of overnight accommodation units. Please let me know if there is anything further needed regarding this project. Leslie K. Dougall-Sides, B.C.S. Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 leslie.douaall-sidesCa)myclearwater.com (727) 562-4010 phone (727) 562-4021 fax Board Certified in City, County and Local Government Law Admitted in Florida, Oregon, and the District of Columbia �/ " x �� x ., r, Fuj__� ��z.�_ ;y ,» ;Z 4 Q 0 Q Z~ W= J LL 2 U Q m Q W a � a U 4 �- � �- �- g— o— �� ENT73.01 on.w.�o nne: LEVEL 1 �w 2013.11.01 A2 1 � �� < � �'. ' � � � � Q � Q Z~ W= J � S U Q W m � W < � w U A�•_ � �..= � �_ � gg— R— g— o_ �� ENT13.01 on.w.�o.mE: LEVEL 2 ree�o„� 2013.17.07 s�r: A2 2 � '� ' � �� ` � : �: � � �, � � 0 a z� w° J � _ U Q W m � w a � W U ENT13.01 ox•x*�ormE: LEVEL 3 �� 2013.11.01 A2 2a �'� ��` � ��, r � � � Q 0 Q z ~ W= ENT13.01 � LEVELS 4 �� 2013.11.01 +en: A2 3 ' I... �; � LEVEL FIVE SCALE t/ib' • 1'-0' PRO.IECi NpiTN � � r , � y '�a�'" .t, �„ . : � ^ � J .) � :x; d a 0 a z� W O LL i a W m � � 3 x w U LEVELS �w 2013.11.01 A2_4 � �; .� �� x f � � .,: � �� . � � � J � Q � � Z~ W= J LL i U Q W m Q W < � W U LEVEL 6 2013.11.01 A2 5 � ��'� x � �` �: � � � � Q � Q z ~ W � J LL i U ¢ m ¢ w a 2 W U ENT13.01 � LEVEL 7 �� 2013.11.07 �� A2 6 :� �� ;. �: � �: � � � Q � Q Z~ W= a.�_ � �.,— _ o_ � �— S= o— �� ENT13.01 � LEVEL 8-9 �� 2013.11.01 A2 7 � � � �5 � z��: � � 7 � <; Q � � Z~ W= J LL _ U Q W m Q W < � W U LEVEL 70 2013.11.07 A2 10 4 WESTELEVATION scn�.r.zs- � . �3. EASTEIEVATION � � � � . . . �. � � � unu:r.zr ,,i. �ii;' �' -, r- =i � � : ;-: . � �'�;��■ ��.��:�'�� w� �:s�- �:� _ �;; Q • • � .�. NORTHELEVATION � . . su��:r.zv . �: � � �-�: :x Q � � J Z ~ L1J � J LL i a m � � 3 a U ENT13.01 ELEVATION AREAS I�d 2013.11.01 A2 13.A ��a ser.ra� x.� a war� �n.. �w:>+w �H�, — ., „�.., XUW1uw1�MMp� m :/dl',t MqS �� -;�-- m m �— W m ��- - � uf�. V��KMALW�.'MF i1Kt� �A�' �u �'�?3 Mx a -� e� +zm� o:x. — -. ,� -...:.e � m .. _' ':., ,o.e.�.,. � .. �...N.�. . � .--- - ..:.5�; " ;s:� :3=}'. - r -�.,. .if i =i��h3f�` , .. �. � . -� ,� .. .. -- .�-+ _�— e�i i�� i I��) 11�17' `��rirr�� rillll!P�� '�■�'I� IIIIIiI►�IINII � ■�" 911IIII�l� � �1��1� �!'�Illlill� 111111►��1 ��I�� ■►�hll� (111►�i� ��i �i�r ��i �n�ii ii�� r� ��i �u�ii �s�i �!�� - I� II�I�IIIII Illll�llllilqlllplll� IIII�IIIII Il�llllp�_ (illl�/■ ■►Z�II� ililll�lll I�!!IiIP�I �� I�1 'I��I �N�II II� 11� 1��1 �II�II 1��1 11111 I Vil�l�Il 1!Ill�lill Ihlli�l;� ' IIII�IIII IIIIIU�i IIIIIII :I■ ■►:�'ll■ !C�I�III I�III!�;I /� �il I�N .....fN�N� !I� 11� 1��1 �II�II I��I �111 '� -�.' .� '�— �" Illl�llli IIIIIIIIU� �I�il�llll� ■II!fuiC�� II'NI�1;� I�Iliillll� � : �: :: ?i :� :: :: :� n � �� .- ��-.�.��.�� . _ ��i.i �! ��I�� .�� l1 �� NORTH ELEVATION iCAIEtMp'M15IBStt1) .�..��=I :i� 1 �� ,rar:can¢ a*vecacc.ttx� [f::�M.tl�.�r(, apn4F�.NLa'. C4!x:.> �'.%aAK. STIRCO C39Rs (taFMtc:WfVKKi9 svc�oarwaenrA+as x�wnr�:.w�..nntmm rw � OLCOM1\TT'YI.YDCN' AtTA�11L1ALC. ��'N.L� 9IlGC000.lT 1 8'1tlXG0.lqIE �6�W:OCO.OM ] '.6'.�c�:x:=. n.u. en�ccoco�.a� � YW t4(i16`VptY 5�M'XIw^:CR ��E<.nK LL � � � � � � � Z~ W � � o�E�,tiQ ENT13.01 uan..,uonns NORTH ELEVATION ��E wiE' 2013.11.01 A2 14 ft[fi Mn� hM �,r,.H�PE.�a.��= �w�, w�� r- _ Q 0 � J Z ~ W �2 � i v w m � � � v a..„�:= �ur�. vaoJE:ix ENT13,01 EAST ELEVATION 2013.1 t.01 A2 16 � W ST E (�V:�T10N vru •n , ..T;;�: --�w.+ �t�9„o �� --�4'+��t=�r► , u.,1 _ "","'-'``'� �7-�7PAr �'l: �4yV1� � � �� _ 1�� : _.�'- ZG� - - rsaecrnne. � � J Z~ W � � � Q m � � � � U ��E�� ENT13,01 VVEST ELEVATION ��`2013.17.01 ewa< A2 17 � COLOR 1 • SW 6129 RESTRAINED GOLD COLOR 2• SW 6127 IVOIRE COLOR 3• SW 6126 NAVAJO WH ITE COLOR 4• SW 6125 CRAFT PAPER Pa��.n� 0 � J z� w° ��F�� ENT 13.01 caori PALATE m� 2013.11.01 A2 18