The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2013-11044� �+ {, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD � ��t��i ��1�� T DEPARTMENT � � PLANNING AND DEVELOPMEN � �:,=�°_-`=�` � � �� ` � °��= STAFF REPORT °�r—�:�.i`-...,'` �._..� `�.�r`'�°'+�.. MEETING DATE: January 21, 2014 AGENDA ITEM: F.1. CAS E : FLD2013-11044 REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit a four-unit Resort Attached Dwelling use in � the Tourist (T) District with a reduction of minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,475 square feet and a reduction of minimum lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, a front (west) setback of ten feet (where ten feet is allowed), a side (north) setback of ten feet (where five feet is allowed), a side (south) setback of five feet (where iive is allowed), a rear (west) setback of zero feet (where five is allowed); and a height of 65 feet (to top of flat roo fl pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-803.K. and the Old Florida District of Beach by Design as well as an increase in the amount of palms on site from 75 percent to 100 percent of the total required as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provision of CDC Section 3-1202.G.; and a two-year Development Order. GENERAL DATA: Agent ........................... Landon, Moree & Associates (Randy Austin, representative) Applicant / Owner ............. Bay Esplanade Project, LLC Location ........................... 669 Bay Esplanade; the subject property (0.15 acres) is located on the east side of Bay Esplanade Ave. roughly 350 feet south of Somerset St. Property Size .................... 0.15 Acres Future Land Use Plan...... Resort Facilities High (RFH) Zoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Special Area Plan........... Adjacent Zoning Nortn: South: East: West: Existing Land Use............ Tourist (T) District . Beach by Design (Old Florida District) Tourist (T) District Tourist (T) District Tourist (T) District Tourist (T) District . Vacant Land Proposed Land Use......... Resort Attached Dwellings ',E--- _ :;:�.� � '■-'" �`� r I� ,�,.{� N * `� „� 4 "y � � � � �? �' � � � ��': � � �� 1 l M � � ,- u ��#'!� . L� � � +Y � � � � � �, • � _o� �I�M `� _ �► ,�. `' � �` r i .,, �a . � ' � �'7, .. , 1 A 1 4 � `� � X ' %��J1�1! %%1�%., t.t b� .._______ - _ _ _ � p��T�l+ p4. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT :�\.itl IFRL4t Level I Flexible Standard Devefopment Application Review oEVELOrMExr �v�w nivisiox e_�� ;�� ,ar.� � � ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.15 acre subject property is located on the east side of Bay Esplanade Ave. roughly 350 feet south of Somerset St. The property is vacant and has no improvements. According to City records it appears that the site was previously developed with an 8-unit apartment building which was demolished in 2005. The site was also approved for attached dwellings through FLD2004-03018, however this approval was never built and has expired. Even though this approval is expired it should be noted that it was first denied by planning and denied by the CDB before the application was revised and approved. Beach by Design, specifically the Old Florida District, was amended subsequent to that application. The requirements for the Old Florida district are different and more detailed than they were previously. The adjacent property to the north consists of the two-story condominium-style-motel building and its associated parking lot. The adjacent property to the south consists of a one-story and two-story attached dwellings and its back-out parking spaces. The properties to the west across Bay Esplanade are vacant but are currently proposed to be developed with 65 foot tall overnight accommodations. It should be noted that while the majority of the surrounding properties are one or two story buildings. They are typically non-conforming with back-out parking spaces. Any new development will face a challenge to fit code-compliant parking spaces on these small lots. This proposal was before the Community Development Board on April 16, 2013 and approved for three units. The current proposal includes four units and there are no changes to the site or building from the previously approved plans. The proposal is before the board as the increase in density does not allow the request to be processed as a minor revision. Development Proposal: The proposal before the Board was previously approved as part of FLD2010-02006 for three attached dwelling units. Community Development Board — January 21, 2013 FLD2013-11044 — Page 1 of 9 Due to the request to add ��lea�Walel level I Flexibie Standard Develo ment A lication Review FLANNING&DEVELOPMENT p PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION - m � �_� ��e�,e� � one dwelling unit bringing the total dwelling units to four, the proposal must be heard by the CDB. It is important to note that there are no changes to the site plan or building elevations including height. The additional unit is being created by reducing the stories of one of the units from three to two. The owners of the property propose to build a six-story, four-unit resort attached dwelling with a building footprint of 3,860 square feet on 0.15 acres in the Old Florida character district of Beach by Design. The building will be 65 feet in height (from base Flood Elevation to flat roo�. The building fa�ade will be a"Deco-esque" tropical modern architecture which is appropriate for the property and compliments the Florida coastal vernacular envisioned by Beach by Design. The first level is proposed to accommodate six parking spaces, where five are required. The second, third and fourth levels are individual units. The fifth and sixth levels are for the fourth unit. The units axe accessed by a common stairwell and elevator which opens to a foyer on each floor. The first three units have three bedrooms with baths and an office with a closet which could function as a fourth bedroom. There is also a covered deck overlooking the intracoastal waterways. The third unit will have a rooftop pool and deck area. The primary entrance will be along the Bay Esplanade and will consist of a door with a canopy for pedestrian and a metal/grated garage door for vehicular access. Solid waste will be accommodated by three roll- out barrels, one for each unit, with an interior storage area. The materials and color of the building reflect the Florida Coastal Vernacular while the design is reminiscent of the Art Deco style. The base of the building will be a white color (Sebring White) with the upper two levels of the building a light grey (Silent Night) and accents in a dark grey (Ocean Floor). The color massing creates a discernible base, middle, and cap. There is variation to the fenestration. Densitv: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 30 dwelling units per acre. The subject property consists of two parcels with the upland area zoned Tourist District totaling 0.15 acres which allows for a maximum of four dwelling units. The proposal for four dwelling units (20 dwelling units per acre) is consistent with the Code provisions. Im�ervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2- 801.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95. The proposed ISR is 0.67, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum lot area for Resort Attached Dwellings range from 5,000 to 10,000 square feet. The proposed subject property consists of 6,475 square feet lot area. Pursuant to the same Table, the required lot width for Resort Attached Dwellings ranges from 50 to 100 feet. The subject property has a lot width of 60 feet along Bay Esplanade. The proposed subject property complies with the lot width and area standards established for Resort Attached Dwelling uses. Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-802, the minimum required parking for resort attached dwellings is 1.5 parking spaces per unit, or a minimum of six parking spaces for Community Development Board — January 21, 2013 FLD2013-11044 — Page 2 of 9 ��etl1 ►T�Le1 Level I Flexible Standard Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 6 �,; �:.a��c: �.° the proposed four-unit resort attached dwelling. The proposal includes a first-floor parking area with six parking spaces, which is compliant with this Code provision. Special Area Plan: Beach by Design: Old Florida District The City has demonstrated through the creation of Beach by Design and subsequent amendments to the plan that it recognizes the need for pedestrian- and boater-friendly development in order to create a vibrant active waterfront serving tourists and locals alike. It is understood that a broad range of uses including attached dwellings, retail sales and service, hotels and motels and restaurants contribute to the creation of the unique character and atmosphere that is Clearwater Beach. Specifically, the vision of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design provides for the development of attached dwellings and resort attached dwellings. The District is envisioned to remain a transitional District between the single-family neighborhood north of the Acacia roundabout and the more intense tourist/resort-type uses with make up the bulk of the development on Clearwater Beach farther to the south. The Old Florida District also provides a set of development parameters addressing building height, minimum setbacks, required building stepbacks, landscape buffers and parking/vehicular access. These development parameters supersede any conflicting statements contained within the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design and the Community Development Code. Furthermore, the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design provide that "Any issue not addressed in [the] Design Guidelines shall be governed by the requirements of the Community Development Code." Therefore, the hierarchy of applicability is as follows: The parameters contained with the Old Florida District supersede the requirements of the Design Guidelines within Beach by Design and the Community Development. The Design Guidelines supersede the requirements of the Community Development Code. The Community Development Code is applicable to development within the Old Florida District when not in conflict with either the development parameters of the Old Florida District and/or the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Maximum Buildin� h�t�. Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the maximum allowable height for resort attached dwellings can range between 35 — 100 feet. The proposed building is 65 feet in height from Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the flat roof, which is within the Code maximum; however, as this property is located within the Old Florida character district of Beach by Design, and as set forth in Beach by Design Section B.2, the maximum height of Resort Attached Dwellings can be 65 feet in height provided the site is located on the south side of Somerset Street and 60 feet or more south of the southerly right-of-way line of Somerset Street. The subject property is approximately 258 feet from south line of Somerset Street. The proposed building is 65 feet in height from Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the flat roof. Beach by Design also states that greater setbacks and/or building stepbacks and enhanced landscaping for buildings exceeding 35 feet in height are contemplated. This height is mitigated by additional stepbacks and enhanced landscaping and is in compliance with this Code Provision. Minimum Setbacks: The Old Florida District of Beach by Design states that the minimum front setback be 15 feet and the side and rear setback be 10 feet. The site has one front (west), two Community Development Board — January 21, 2013 FLD2013-11044 — Page 3 of 9 � �Jr �T } f+ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT � C�A1 �!' �L�l Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � � , . ��-��F,4, .. _ sides (north and south) and one rear (east). Beach by Design also allows for a maximum reduction of five feet on the condition that the reduction results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance. Reductions to setbacks may also be requested if stepbacks are increased at the rate of two feet in increased stepback for every one foot decreased in setback. The development proposal meets the required side (north) setback of ten feet (to building), and includes reductions to setbacks to the front (west) setback of ten feet (to building) where 15 is required but ten may be requested, a side (south) setback of five feet (to building) where five may be requested, a rear (east) setback of zero feet (to proposed pavers) where ten is required but five may be requested. The proposed front (west) and side (south) setback reductions are to allow code-compliant enclosed parking spaces on the ground level. These setbacks are necessary to accommodate a 24- foot wide drive aisle and 9-foot by 18-foot parking spaces on a 60-foot wide lot. It should be noted that any new development in the Old Florida character district will face challenges of providing required parking on site that is not back-out. The provided parking will be enclosed in the building which results in an improved and pedestrian-oriented site plan and the reductions are justified. The proposed rear setback of zero feet is not able to be requested for buildings in excess of 35 feet where the required rear setback is 10 feet with a maximum reduction of 5 feet. The majority of the proposed paver patio at the rear (east) is setback five feet from the property line. This reduction down to a five foot rear setback may be requested; however any portion of the patio that extends beyond this point is not permissible by Beach by Design. It is a condition of approval that revised site plans showing the removal of that portion of the paver patio extending past the five foot setback to the sea wall be submitted prior to issuance of any building permit. Minimum Stepbacks: Old Florida District of Beach by Design states that buildings exceeding 35 feet in height shall provide at least one stepback on at least one side of the building at a point of 35 feet (or less). The dimension of the required stepback for a property on a 60-foot-wide right-of-way is one foot in stepback for every 2.5 feet in building height above 35 feet. For the proposed 65 foot tall building the required stepback is 12 feet. The proposal includes a 12 foot stepback on the front (west) fa�ade at a height of 27 feet. In addition to the one required stepback the proposal includes an additional five other stepbacks. The second stepback five feet in depth at a height of 4.6 feet on the side (south) fa�ade. This steps back directly over the ground level parking. On the south property line the proposed setback is 5 feet, however, the additional stepback of 5 feet creates an airspace of 10 feet on the south property line and is mitigating the reduction in setback. The third stepback is on the side (north) fa�ade at a height of 38.6 feet. The fourth stepback is on the front (west) fa�ade at a height of 52.6 feet. The fifth stepback is on the rear (east) fa�ade at a height of 38.6 feet. The sixth stepback is on the rear (east) fa�ade at a height of 52.6 feet. There is a stepback on every side of the building fa�ade, with two stepbacks on the front (west) and rear (east) facades. This collection of stepbacks helps to reduce the bulk of the building by more than 2/3 as it reaches the Community Development Board — January 21, 2013 FLD2013-11044 — Page 4 of 9 � n f� PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT : C e��[t�el Level I Flexible Standard Development Appiication Review navsLOrn�rrrxEV�wnrvisiorr �*;.�;:�::, �a height of 65 feet. The design and the stepbacks also break up the mass visually and articulated the planar facades. The proposal is meeting and exceeding the aforementioned Code provision. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. The location and screening of inechanical equipment complies with this Code provision. Sight Visibilitv Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the driveway on Bay Esplanade, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. Shrubbery planted within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements. The proposal complies with this Code provision. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines for these resort attached dwellings will be installed underground on-site in compliance with this requirement. The proposal complies with this Code provision. Landscapin�: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District; however, pursuant to Beach by Design, the Old Florida District requires a ten foot landscape buffer along the street frontage of all properties. The proposal includes a front landscape buffer width of ten feet. A Phoenix palm, which is a specimen palm and is equal to one shade tree, is provided in the front buffer along with three, pineapple guava, accent trees. This combination is equivalent to more than two shade trees and is more than the required one shade tree every 35 feet. Also provided will be flowering shrubs (hibiscus and fire bush) as well as flowering ground cover. Along the side (north) property line a ten foot wide landscape buffer is provided with native palms (sabal and paurotis) and shrubs. Five feet of the buffer must be ground cover to provide fire access around the building. On the side (south) property line there is limited area for landscaping with the reduced setback and walkway, however hedges (podocarpus and Simpsons stopper) are provided and well as native palms (sabal). Additional native plant material is provided along the rear (east) property line including sabal palms and coontie ground cover. It should be noted that some changes to the landscaping on the rear (east) property line will occur when the proposed patio and walkway are revised to meet the five foot rear setback, however the landscaping provided i� in addition to the minimum required and is in compliance with the Code Provisions. All landscaping plants and trees shall be Florida Grade # 1 plant material with an automatic irrigation system. Solid Waste: The storage area for the four black barrels, one for each unit, is located to the interior of the garage. The barrels will be screened by being inside the building. The pedestrian door and walkway provide access to the exterior staging area for the black barrels. While only three black barrels are shown on the site plan, a condition of approval is included that prior to any building permits, the location of the forth black barrel be shown. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Community Development Board — January 21, 2013 FLD2013-11044 — Page 5 of 9 ' ViQcll 1'1'alel Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review � , ... _ . . -�..�:a ;�. >:�> , , . .. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Additional Beach by Design Guidelines: Section B.3. requires that the floorplate of any portion of the building that is between forty-five feet and one hundred feet in height will be no greater than 25,000 square feet except for structures open the public. The total square footage of all levels is 11,094 square feet, therefore each of these floor levels comply with the guidelines. The gradual reduction in floor area per level creates a wedding cake affect as required. The proposed building is in compliance with the guidelines. Section L.1 requires finish materials and building colors to reflect Florida or coastal vernacular themes. The base of the building will be a white color (Sebring White) with the upper two levels of the building a light grey (Silent Night) and accents in a dark grey (Ocean Floor). The color massing creates a discernible base, middle, and top. There is variation to the fenestration. The development of resort attached dwellings on the subject property is consistent with the surrounding uses, and is consistent with the emerging pattern and standards of redevelopment in this character district. The building fa�ade will be a"Deco-esque" tropical modern architecture which is appropriate for the property and compliments the Florida coastal vernacular envisioned by Beach by Design. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Section 2-801.1 and Table 2-803 and Beach by Design; Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 30 units per acre 20 units per acre X (4 units) (4 units) Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.67 X Minimum Lot Area 5,000 —10,000 6,475 square feet X Minimum Lot Width 50-100 60 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front : 15 West: 10 feet (to building) X' Side: 10 South: Zero feet (to walkway) Xl 5 feet (to building) North: 10 feet (to building) X Rear : 10 East: Zero feet (to pavement) X� 10 feet (to building) Maximum Height 65 feet from BFE 65 feet (from BFE to top of roof X through Beach by slab) Design Minimum 1.5 per unit 6 parking spaces (1.5 per unit) X Off-Street Parkin � See analysis in staff report Community Development Board — January 21, 2013 FLD2013-11044 — Page 6 of 9 a�le��!'alet Level I Fiexible Standard Development Application Review u,.. .. . � _..��. �:.. ._ -. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2- 803.K (Resort Attached Dwellings): 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the pazcel proposed for development; 2. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appeazance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street pazking on the ground floor of the residential building 3. Front setback: a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 4. Side and rear setbacks: a. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the reaz of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more e�cient parking or improved design and appearance. 5. Off-street parking: Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level fa�ade comparable to the architectural chazacter and finishes of a residential building without pazking on the ground level. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. 6. Accessory uses: a. Accessory uses, including but not limited to restaurants, snack bars, and sundries shops, must be incidental and subordinate to the primary use, and the ma�cimum floor azea for interior accessory uses shall not exceed, in the aggregate, 15 percent of the building footprint; Consistent X X �/_ X E:j /� Inconsistent COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-914.A., CDC: l. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactorv and hours of operation impacts on adiacent nronerties. Community Development Board — January 21, 2013 FLD2013-11044 — Page 7 of 9 Consistent Inconsistent X X X X X X � Cle[4��r1'ul�e.L Level I Fiexible Standard Develo ment A lication Review PLn��rrc&nEVELOrMExT L ��.� n. .� p PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of January 2, 2014, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 0.15 acre upland subject property is located on the east side of Bay Esplanade Avenue, roughly 350 feet south of Somerset Street; 2. The subject property is currently vacant; 3. That the subject property is located in the Tourist (T) District and the Resort High Facilities (RFH) future land use plan category; 4. That the subject property is located in the Old Florida District of Beach by Design and is subject to all applicable requirements set forth therein; -5. That the proposal includes a reduction of minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,475 square feet and a reduction of minimum lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet; 6. The proposal is to construct a four-unit Resort Attached Dwelling; 7. The Resort Attached Dwelling is proposed at a height of 65 feet from the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the top of flat roof; 8. That the front building fa�ade has at least one vertical step back as set forth in Beach by Design guidelines, and overall six stepbacks are provided on the building; 9. That the proposal includes variation of fenestration, color massing which creates a discernible base, middle, and cap; 10. The first level of the building will provide a total of six fully enclosed and screened parking spaces; 11. The proposal includes a front (west) setback of 10 feet (where 10 is allowed), a side (north) setback of 10 feet (where S is allowed), a side (south) setback of 5 feet (where 5 is allowed), a rear (west) setback of 5 feet (where 5 is allowed); 12. That the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95 and the proposed ISR is 0.67; 13. That the proposal includes a request for a two year Development Order; and 14. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Community Development Code Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Community Development Code Section 2-803.K; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3-914.A; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the landscaping requirements of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G; Community Development Board — January 21, 2013 FLD2013-11044 — Page 8 of 9 ° rtI� } f+ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT = C��l rtaLel Level I Flexible Standard Development Application Review DEVELOPMENTREViEWDIVISION � �.�.,, e�<�� 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Old Florida character district of Beach by Design; and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a four-unit Resort Attached Dwelling use in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction of minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,475 square feet and a reduction of minimum lot width from 100 feet to 60 feet, a front (west) setback of 10 feet (where 10 is allowed), a side (north) setback of 10 feet (where 5 is allowed), a side (south) setback of 5 feet (where 5 is allowed), a rear (west) setback of 5 feet (where 5 is allowed); and a height of 65 feet (to top of flat roo� pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-803.K. and the Old Florida District of Beach by Design as well as an increase in the amount of palms on site from 75 percent to 100 percent of the total required as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provision of CDC Section 3-1202.G.; and a two- year Development Order, subject to the following conditions of approval: Conditions of Approval: 1. That revised site plans showing the removal of that portion of the paver patio extending past the five foot setback to the sea wall be submitted prior to issuance of any building permit; 2. That a Unity of Title for parcels OS/29/15/54756/077/0080 and OS/29/15/00000/310/0600 be recorded and submitted prior to the issuance of any building permit; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 4. That all landscaping plants and trees shall be Florida Grade #1 plant material with an automatic irrigation system; 5. That prior to the issuance of any building permits all conditions of the Fire Department be satisfied; 6. That prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all utilities, including individual distribution lines serving this development within the right-of-way along the east side of Bay Esplanade, as applicable, must be installed underground unless undergrounding is not practicable; 7. That prior to any building permits, the location of the forth black barrel be shown; and 8. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe andlor fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: ' Matt Jacl so , Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Maps, Photographs of Site and Vicinity Community Development Board — January 21, 2013 FLD2013-11044 — Page 9 of 9 ,� �� w�,� `i! r. r �.. �.� . �� ' ,.. ..a,. -r.c"L'�r -*... ...+a �� -..-. . / � .. � � _ �� "�' �: 4 Ac 1 \. . . 'r' i.�_ :._ � _ �� . � �� I ��y .� .. -y . .. . � .. - M_ . � .}.�TiC� Nfi' ..�_.'n 'S' � . ''"'^ „. . . . . . I . . .�.. w . . . � k� f�� l� t�� ` x Y � ��1�R+.,:rr,.��+ t. _._ ._ ., e , ..s:t . . ... . . . .... View looking east from southwest corner of site. View of the property to the north looking east from Bay Esplanade. .��= •-� � P �� ; 'r -+�""x°' ' �^^ti�f�",'�� ., _ ,, .�,.---.�._.�. � _- _ � t �� -- _ , . I ��'}« >.�_ � . y —' �1 �,}" .rd � ,`7kg'� r . :"' ,rr`'�I�i,.[�!:��, _ � . "g "' � xa ...3 �► � .a�,.��"IyIR'M+1' v"`l. � f. li" rt a$� ,� i' ., .�y� � � . �,y.,,, ,� �X"'a ,y,., � �, 7 .= ; ��,,,�,H: ,. y i{. ' y/��+T ��'{..�i +� vK�.�»�. �'�. N . !P� ` ..i' . a ... � . 1��e-'9��r �'lt`�L ''� J�.' . ... n .+�w..1:2 p �y . View of the property to the south looking south from the center of the subject property. ��-. �, .� — ,� a � t . .�., � .��. � ;sw;° r �� ' �' � r . . . . . . f.- ��: _ . �?�'t'" �?. 2� . _. .. _ -"LL.;. View looking west towards Bay Esplanade from the center of the subject property. �:'z ` Y J � ....._.. _ �' �' " View looking north from Bay Esplanade directly in front of View of the property to the south looking east from Bay the subject property. Esplanade. 669 Bay Esplanade FLD2013-11044 Matthew Jackson 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4504 matthew. i ackson(�a,mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ❑ Planner III February 2013 to present City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. ❑ Planner II City of Clearwater, Cleanvater, Florida May 2011 to February 2013 October 2008 to June 2010 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. ❑ Planner I Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007 Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances. In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead project kick-off ineetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs. Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities. ❑ Manager Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 2004 Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing and special events. ❑ Linguist US Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995 Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training. EDUCATION ❑ Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007 ❑ Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004 31822 U3 19 North P�Im Harhnr, Florida 34884 �� phone: ��z�� ysaso�o �� Toll Free: 1-8U0-262-7960 ��,�� Fax: �rzr� 7er-assa ��I�I� Landon, More� 8� Associate�, Inc. www.�nnA�NOR.coan Civil & Environmental Engineerffi - PI�„ners • Suwsyora AUSTIFI�LMAENOR COM December 10, 2013 City of Clearwater Planning & Development Dept. 100 South Myrtie Avenue, 2"d floor Clearwater, FL 33756 At�n: Matthew Jackson Re: DeNunzio Residentiai - 669 Bay Esplanade FLD2Q13-11044 Dear Mr. Jackson: Please find enclosed 15 (1 original & 14 copies) sets of the following items per City of Clearwater requirements: . Fiexibie Develapment Application & Associated Exhibits • Comprehensive Landscaping Application • Civil Engineering Construction Plans . Architectural Plans & Elevations • Landscape & Irrigation Plans (w/ 8.5x11 plans} . Drainage Calculations • Property Survey Please contact me if you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, LANDON, MOREE & ASSOCIATES, INC. �____�- Randy Austin Project Manager F:1Projecis�851-02 Denunzio CondolC�y oi Clearvrate�2013-12-10 Submlttal Letter.doc ° learwater � V U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $1,205 PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): The DeNunzio Group, LLC MAILING ADDRE55: 305 Cambridge Street, Suite 3, Cambridge, MA 02141 PHONE NUMBER: (617) 945-2555 EMAI�: DJD@TheDuNunzioGroup.com AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Landon, Moree & Associates, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 31622 US 19 NOrth, Palm Harbor, FL 34684 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 789-5010 EMAIL: AUSTIN@LMAENGR.COM ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 669 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767 PARCEL NUMBER(S): 05-29-015-54756-077-0080 & 05-29-15-00000-310-0600 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached Exhibit A PROPOSED USE(5): Resort Attached Dwelling DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See attached Exhibit B Specifically identify the request (include all requested code flexibility,• e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height setbacks, lot size, !ot width, specific use, etc.): Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01N2 ° learwater �C U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): Tourist District, Old Florida (Beach by Design) RFH, Resort Facilities High Vacant land PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): Resort AttaChed Dwelling SITE AREA: 6,475 Sq, ft. 0.15 acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: 0 sq. ft. Proposed: 11,094 sq. ft. Maximum Allowable: N/A sq. ft. GRO55 FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses): First use: 11,094 sq. ft. Second use: N/A sq. ft. Third use: N/A sq. ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: 0.0 Proposed: 1.71 Maximum Allowable: N/A BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1�` floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: 0 sq. ft. ( 0•0 % of site) Proposed: 3,860 sq. ft. ( 59.6 % of site) Maximum Permitted: 4,636 sq. ft. ( 71.6 % of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: 0 sq. ft. ( 0.0 % of site) Proposed: 0 sq. ft. ( 0.0 % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: 0 sq. ft. ( 0.0 Proposed: 3,266 sq. ft. ( 50.4 % of site) % of site) Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 01/12 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the totni square footage of entire site): Existi ng: 0.0 Proposed: 0.67 Maximum Permitted: 0.95 DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre): Existing: � Proposed: 4 units, 27/ac Maximum Permitted: 5 units, 30/ac OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: � Proposed: 6 Minimum Required: 6 BUILDING HEIGHT: Existing: � Proposed: 65' above BFE Maximum Permitted: 35' WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $ 1,500,000.00 ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: Tourist South: Tourist East: Tourist West: Tourist STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this ��' � day of representations made in this application are true and �-��,�,��, `-�.,,s,�'"•tti---�-__ ��"�. to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize � City representatives to visit and photograph the ��"� - 4 i �-.�� who is personally known has property described in this application. � produced asidentification. _ _.� / Signature of property owner or representative � My commission expires My Comm. Ezpirea I 15, 2015 Commission f 108821 Bonded Thra Notxy A�m. Planning � Development Department, 100 S. AAyrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33�56, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 3 of 8 Revised 01/12 o Planning & Development Department � � earwater Flexible Development Application � Site Plan Submittal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: ❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. ❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other si milar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. ❑ A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: ❑ Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. ❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. ❑ Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. ❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. ❑ Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. ❑ Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points of access. ❑ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and seawalls and any proposed utility easements. ❑ Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit. ❑ Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection. ❑ Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406. ❑ All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections and bus shelters. ❑ Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. ❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials. Planning 8� Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01/12 � ❑ Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. ❑ Demolition plan. ❑ Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. ❑ If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information. ❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying those trees proposed to be removed, if any. ❑ A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff. ❑ A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more of the following conditions: ■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable levels; or ■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or ■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors. ❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall incfude the following information, if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval: ❑ Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. ❑ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line. ❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. ❑ Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape. ❑ Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. ❑ Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations. ❑ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any. Planning & Development DepaRment, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 5 of S Revised 01/12 � o Planning & Development Department � C earwater Flexible Develo ment A lication P PP � General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAII, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See attached Exhibit B 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See attached Exhibit B 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See attached Exhibit B 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See attached Exhibit B 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See attached Exhibit B 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See attached Exhibit B Planning 8� Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/72 ° Clearwater U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). 1 See attached Exhibit B 2. 3. 5. 6. 8. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-56211567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01/12 � ° learwater �� Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application � Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: The DeNunzio Group, LLC 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: 669 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): See attached Exhibit B 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Landon, Moree & Associates, Inc. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. See previously submitted Authorization Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner Property Owner BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS DAY OF , , PERSONALLY APPEARED WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFiDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. Notary Seal/Stamp Notary Public Signature My Commission Expires: Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 8 of 8 Revised 01/12 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTI�N PMCEL 1: 1HAT PART OF UNPLATTED BLOCK 77, UWt N0. 5, NANDALAY REPUT, ACCORDING TO iHE MAP OR PUT iHEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, WHICH WAS fORNERLY KNOWN AS LOT 8, BLOCK 77, MANDAUY �TFIE ISLE OF A iHOUSAND PAL61S', CLEARWATER BEACH UNIT N0. 5, ACCORDING TO iHE MAP OR PLAT 1HEREOf, AS RECORDED IN PUT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, ALL OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNiY, FLORIDA. AND PARCEL 2: 1HAT PART OF TIIF DEED j17451, LYING EAST OF BLOCK 77, MANDALAY UNIT N0. 5, AS RECORDED IN PUT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, Of THE PUBUC RECORDS OF PINELUS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING �IORE PARIICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINI�NG AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 8, BLOq( 77, OF SAID MANDALAY UNIT N0. 5; THENCE RUN N06'S8'23�W, ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 8, FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; 1HENCE RUN S89'35'02'E, ALONG THE EASiERLY EXTENSION OF 1HE NORiHERLY BOUNDARY UNE UF SAID LOT 8, A DISTANCE OF 300.03 FEET; THENCE RUN SOfi'S8'23�E, ALONG A LINE PARAILEI TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY Of SAID LOT 8, FOR A DISTAN(� Of 60.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY EXTENSION Of iHE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY UNE OF SAID i0T 8; THENCE RUN N89'35'02'W, ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION OF iHE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY UNE OF LOT 8, FOR A DISTANCE OF 300.03 FEET TO iHE POINT OF BEG�IING. Exhibit "B" Flexible Standard Development Approval Resort Attached Dwelling 669 Bay Esplanade The DeNunzio Group, LLC The Applicant requests to amend the existing Development Order granted on April 19, 2013 pursuant to Case Number FLD2013-02006 ("Project"). On April 16 2013, the Community Development Board approved the Project as a three-unit Resort Accommodation. The Applicant now requests to increase the units from three to four. As discussed in the prior approval, the Project is located in the Old Florida character district, as defined by Beach by Design. The Old Florida District encourages a mix of residential, recreational, and tourist uses. The Project encompasses two infill sites located in the Old Florida District, which is a transition area from the commercial areas south of the District to the residential areas of North Clearwater Beach. The Project fits with this transition by providing a dwelling use that can be either transient or permanent in this area (per the definition of "Resort Accommodation") and increasing the density by one unit does not impact this compatibility. It is anticipated that the Project will be used for long and short term vacation stays. Specifically, the applicant requests approval of a resort attached dwelling project which is consistent with section 2-802(Q) of the Code and the Old Florida Character District design guidelines as follows: 1. Four (4) resort attached dwelling units (FLD2013-02006 approved three units); 2. 6 parking spaces when at least 6 are required by Code; 3. Height of 65 feet from Base Flood Elevation where 65 ft. is permitted by Beach by Design ("BBD"); 4. Setbacks a. 10 ft. side (north) setback when 10 ft. is required by Code b. 10 ft. front (west) setback when 10-15 is required by Code c. 5 ft. side (south) setback when 5-10 ft. is required by Code an additional 5' stepback above the first level. (excluding the elevator and stair tower) d. 5 ft. rear (east) setback when 5-10 ft. is required by Code 5. Lot area of .15 acres m.o.l. The Project is located more than 60 feet south of the southerly right of way of Somerset Street. The ProjecYs design meets the height, setback and stepback requirements of the Old Florida District. The Florida vernacular architecture and 1 compatibility with the neighborhood, including the proposed Hotel to be located across the street, provides for a desirable infill project in this area. General Applicability Criteria 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The very goal of the design of this development is to address the character of this area. This area is in a state of flux with redevelopment pressures coming to bear on the area. The Project exemplifies the City's planning and zoning goals, and demonstrates the design and planning intents of BBD due to its limited si2e, scope, and design. The height is consistent with the thresholds set forth in BBD and the design incorporates stepbacks and setbacks, consistent with the City's policies and the goals of the Old Florida Character District. The increase from three to four units is consistent with the Code. The change in density is solely within the previously-approved building and does not change the scale, bulk, coverage or character of the previously-approved Project. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The increase from three units to four units per this request keeps with the City of Clearwater's goals for the Tourist District and the Old Florida District, as well as each district's planning criteria. The Project sets a positive design and development standard and encourages similar (re)development in the area. The Project is an infill project and is an improvement to the existing area. The change in density makes financing and construction schedules fit within the owner's needs. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. By respecting the design criteria and building codes applicable within the District, the Project protects the general Health, Safety, and Welfare of, first, the neighborhood, and second, of all persons utilizing the development and any and all residents of the development. The increase in density is within the parameters of the Code and will not adversely affect the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The entry and egress points from the Project are designed to minimize impacts and to maximize the efficiency of the vehicular flow to and from the Project. Sufficient, on-site parking on the first floor also reduces traffic congestion as visitors or tenants will not have to park on the street. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The Old Florida District is a combination of residential and commercial developments. The Project fits with this development mix as it provides a residential atmosphere for visitors or vacation homes. A four-unit Project is consistent with density permissible in the area. The surrounding parcels are attached dwellings. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The Project includes state of the art facilities that will help to protect and preserve the visual, olfactory, and auditory environment of the area. The proposed increase in density does not modify this design. The Project is designed to comply with all applicable building codes. A Comprehensive Landscape Program application was previously approved in conjunction with FLD2013-02006 and provides a plan that will not only shield and buffer the property, but also beautify the neighborhood. The Applicant proposes no change to the approved landscape plan. Flexibility Criteria 1. Height a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; Per BBD, the proposed height is balanced by a greatly enhanced landscape program, totally concealing the parking and creating a readily identifiable front entrance, and by providing greater stepbacks on all sides of the building. On the south side, the building is stepped back back to the standard 10-foot building setback at the first floor above the parking. In light of the front setback reduction, the building is stepped back again at the approximate 27-foot height the full required stepback dimension. b. The proposed height allows for off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building; This Project was approved with a height of 65 feet (measured above Base Flood Elevation). This height is within the limits of the "Tourist District" and the "Old Florida District" as specified by BBD which permits attached dwellings to have a height of 65 feet and resort attached dwellings to have a height of 35 feet to 100 feet. The proposed height allows for a smaller building footprint and to provide necessary off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building. Because this development is in a FEMA flood zone proposing an enclosed, six-space, parking garage on the ground level. There is still ample parking even with the proposed increase in density from three to four units. 2. Off-street parking: Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level fa�ade 3 comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. The required off-street parking is housed entirely within the footprint of the building and the base is designed to hide the parked vehicles. 3. Front setback: The addition of one unit does not modify the previously- approved request with respect to setbacks. a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life. To accommodate the parking garage beneath the building a five-foot reduction to the front setback was previously approved. The building is stepped back at 27 feet as opposed to the higher 35-foot height stipulated in BBD to minimize this appearance of the reduction. Additionally, the Project includes an additional stepback at the 54-foot height to further reduce the scale of the building and the height. b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. The Project was approved with an improved landscape design. Enclosing the parking garage provides an aesthetically appealing and desirable design thus discouraging the typical "House on Stilts" streetscape. The Project provides a more pedestrian-feel than similar projects without stepbacks or enclosed garages. 4. Rear Setbacks. a. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. c. The reduction in rear setback does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. The proposed increase in density does not include a request to reduce the rear setback below what is permitted by Code or previously approved. Emergency vehicles have full access to the building. The Project includes a five-foot reduction to the south side-yard setback to accommodate the parking garage. Fire department access is provided on both sides of the building. The side setback relief allows for an enhanced streetscape, by taking cars off the street, near the entry of the Project and for a pedestrian-friendly design with landscaping. The parking garage design minimizes the side-yard setback relief while still having an enclosed parking area. See response 5(v) for additional justification regarding the previously reduced setbacks, consistent with BBD standards. 5. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. The Project is a catalyst for new development in this area of Clearwater Beach. It is located in the Old Florida Character District. The increase of density does not substantively modify the previously approved request. The approved design of the Project is consistent with the Beach by Design: Design Objectives in the following ways: i. Bulk: The bulk of the building is broken down by 6 total stepbacks on various 4 sides of the building and color changes in the fa�ade. The stepback distances total 54 feet and the building reduces more than 2/3 in bulk as it approaches the 65-foot requested height. These measures allow for the required sidewalks and landscaping along the perimeter of the site. ii. Density: This proposal increases approved density from three to four residential units. The four units, as proposed, are necessary to supporting the cost of the redevelopment while still allowing for the onsite parking and the overall building to fit within the parameters of the Code. iii. Height: The Project is 65 feet high and is within the "T" District and BBD standards for the Old Florida Character District for properties over 60 feet south of the southerly right of way of Somerset Street. iv. Design, Scale, and Mass: The approved Project's building footprint is less than 5,000 square feet and no dimension is longer than 100 feet. The design articulates the planar facades with slight plane, material and color changes. The design includes vertical stepbacks which create a discernible base, middle, and top to the building. There are also varying the window types and openings. The length of the building is interrupted by the building stepbacks, color, height variations, and material changes including varied fenestration styles, sizes, and designs. v. Setbacks and Stepbacks: The side setback is primarily related to the parking garage. As stated above, the building's design has the required stepbacks, along with many additional stepbacks on all four sides of the building. On the front farade the building steps back in two steps; the first, 12 feet, at 27-feet height and the second, 2.5 feet to 5 feet, at 54-feet height. Based on setbacks and height, the required first stepback is 12 feet (65'-35'= 30', 30'/2.5'=12'). The second stepback, at the 54-foot height, is 2.5 feet, curving back to 5.5 feet. According to BBD, Old Florida Character District, relief of up to 5 feet on a side setback is permitted if: (a) the decreased setback results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance; The approved plan includes a 5-foot deviation to the south side-yard setback to accommodate the garage parking compensated for by landscaping, fully shielded vehicular parking, and an enhanced building design and 5-foot building stepback immediately above the parking level (excepting the elevators and stairs to accommodate the parking aisle width). (b) To ensure that unimpaired access to mechanical features of a building is maintained there is a minimum of 5 feet unobstructed access; :� The approved Project maintains the required minimum 5-foot access on all sides of the building. (c) And the decrease is at a rate of 1 foot in required setback per 2 feet in additional required stepback. The above setback / stepback trade-off is not applicable. The Project complies with the Stepback guidelines. The required first stepback is 12 feet (65'-35'=30', 30'/2.5'=12); a second stepback of 2.5 feet at the 54- foot height is also included. The request to increase density does not change the Project's setbacks or stepbacks. vi. Street-level Facades: The street side fa�ade of the building is narrow but accommodates an 18-foot wide garage opening with a roll-up grill type door, a front door with a projecting canopy, and approximately 20-foot width of wall. The fa�ade, at the ground level, also steps back in to break up the, otherwise, flat unarticulated wall plane, meeting the BBD criterion. vii. Signage: Other than required street numbers and a small building name or rental number display, no signage is proposed. The applicant will separately submit its signage req uest. viii. Sidewalks: The approved Project replaces the existing sidewalk and installs the required sidewalk 24 inches from the curb line with low greenscape then to the property line. ix. Street Furniture and Bicycle Racks: There is no street furniture or bicycle storage as this is a primarily residential development. x. Street Lighting: Street lighting is provided by public utilities. xi. Fountains: The site is very small, as is the proposed development, and a fountain would likely be out of place and could not be incorporated into the design. xii. Materials and Colors: The materials and colors proposed reflect the Florida Coastal Vernacular while the design is reminiscent of the Art Deco style. The Project includes a somewhat light monochrome fa�ade with an accent colored entry cover, railings, and window spandrel panels. 0 � xiii. Landscaping. The Project maintains a 10-foot landscape buffer as required by the Old Florida Character District. xiv. Parking. The Project includes off-street parking in excess of the Code requirements. 6. Accessory uses: a. Accessory uses, including but not limited to restaurants, snack bars, and sundries shops, must be incidental and subordinate to the primary use, and the maximum floor area for interior accessory uses shall not exceed, in the aggregate, 15 percent of the building footprint; There are no proposed accessory uses proposed for the Project. b. No signage shall be visible from outside of the development. As there are no proposed accessory uses, there is no signage proposed for such use. � 4973394v2 � LL ° C earwat�r U Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application IT IS INCUMBENT UPOPI THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INPORMATION. ANY MISIEADING, DECEPTIV�, INCOMPIETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATI�N MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICAT{ON. ALL APPUCATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COM PLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING $ QEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADUNE DATE. A TOTAL OF il COMPLETE SETS OP PLANS AND APPLICAT(ON MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUlRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTHE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMtTTAI POR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD, IP NECESSARY, WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPlETE SETS aF PLANS AND APPLICATFON MATERIALS (1 OR{GINAL AND 14 COPIESj. PLANS AN� APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COUATED, STAPLED ANQ FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLIGWT, BY FIUNG THIS APPLtCAT10N, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH AlL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO�E. PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEEDj: The DeNunzlo Group, LLC MAILING ADORESS: 305 Cambrtdge St., Suite 3, Cambrldge, MA OZ141 PHONE NUMBER: 617-915-2555 EMAIL• DJD�TheDeNurtzloGroup.com AGENT QR REPRESENTATIVE: Candon, Morec & Associates, Inc. MAtIING ADORESS: 316Z2 US Huy.19 Nort12. Palm Harbor, FL 34G84 PHONE NUMBER: 727-789-5010 EMAtI: AusUn�lmaengr:com ADORESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 669BayEsplanade, Clearwater, Florlda DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST; Provlde Bexiblli�y tn the required placemenf and quanl111es o!laadecape malerlals and SpedjfcaMy tdendJy the request requlred percentages of palms, carropy Irees aod accenl lree�s Reduce the rcqulred (include all requested code /lewfbtUty; Q��u1�, of canopy Irees. e.g., redvction t� reqWred nwnber of parklnQ spvices, hNgh� setbacks, !ot slze, (ot width, specijic ux, etc.J: STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS �.,,�/' I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all 5woc to and subscribed before me this �� D" � day of representat9ons made in this applicatian are true and F accurate to the best af rny knowledge and authorize �'�` �'� ��' �.�• to me and/or by City representatives to visit and photograph the �-�' �'' Ly r� .S'� h�roho i� er nally� known has property described in this appllcatlan. produced as idenNHcation. Signature of property owner or representative Notary public, My commission Plsnning 6 Oewlopm�nt Dsparfrnsr�,100 S. Myrds Av�nue, ClearwaNr, FL Page 1 of Z IEUtNO E. �. a ° �learwater Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application ° Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE FIVE (5) FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA EXPLAfNING NOW, IN DETAII, THE CRITERION IS BEIN6 COMpIIED WtTH PER THI5 COMPREHENSIVE CAPI�SCAPING PROPOSAL. 1. Architectural Theme: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive la�dscaping program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings praposed or developed on the parcel p�oposed for the development. Tlie landscape program will provide a trapical Florida landscap� theme, utilizing palms, accent trees, shrubs and groundcovers that are in context with the bullding's Art Deco archlfecture. Thls troplcal Florida laridscape theme will also Pollow the aesthetic goals for the Old Flotida Dlsfrlct, as described withln the Beaclr by Design requirements. OR b. The design, character, (ocaHon and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaptng program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2 Lighting. My lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscaping program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. The bullding, slgnage and landscape accent !lglrting will be designed to Ilmit /Ig/Jting oil`'stte and reduce glare to any adjacent neighbors. Subtle IighNng wiI! be provlded for building slgnage as a way flnding /locatfo�2 cue for residerits and/orguuest during the r�ight time hours. 3. Community Chamcter. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program wiil enhance the community charader of the City of Clearwater. The project wlll provfde /andscape trearments along the roadway frontage which wfll act io sof7en the overal! visual aesthetic ofthe ImmedJate neiBhborhood area, whlch currentty has asphalt park�ng as the overall vlsua! lmpressloa from the roadway. 4. Property Va/ues. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive landscaping pragram wiN have a beneNcial impact on the value of the property in the nnmediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for developmertt. The buf[ding wII! have an up-scale vlsual aesthetic due to the proposed archltectural s[yle and Iandscaping. This wtl! enfrance the overa!! v/sual impresslon of the tmmedlate area and dierefore the percetved value of the surrounding nefghborhood. 5. Special Area or 5cenlc Corrtdor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any speclal area or scenic corrfdor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area (n which the parce{ proposed for development Is located. As stated prevlously, the tcoplcal Florida tandscape theme w!!I fo!!ow the aestheticgoals for the Old Florlda DIsUJci, as descrlbeed wlthln the Beach by Deslg�i requlrements. PlanNnq � Oavalopnwnt Dapartmsnt,100 8. Myrtle Avanue, qaarwater, FL 33758, Tal: M7•662�4667; Fax: 727•Si2�4866 Psge 2 of 2 Ravb�d 01h2 ar� �om VICINITY MAP r'°n n' 4 Y y * ywv�r aM.¢ 3 � � � 91E , �+x 4 � r � ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION � � .�. �..�. m:.:n;."�d::': '.�� iaurir:.iii�s�i ni�'s�i�s<w°•wsawcav�a� r� � �anr =.�w�a w.�r�rmrErr � �� iiai�t�`s� vi:�� w.^n�a PROJECTTEAM �>n.N �x�l �e+3�e5.I�roqv�punaNry.mm "�; �a"s�.°�a:�..w.�,>,� m�arinm3tsoi fPn.lWlaso��i ie�nPist.an�scrma.mp� Rn.lYllPll xS�x5B.4yAf+��iW �a'M.b c �++m'�sY.4�c. PnJ: f1ZlI k F� a3�1B1 IPn.I: f/nl �1ace1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR: DeNunzio Residential SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Prepared For: The DeNunzio Group, LLC 305 CAMBRIDGE ST, SUITE 3 CAMBRIDGE, MA 02141 Ph. (617) 945-2555 DJ D@The DeN u nzioGroup.com Prepared By: ""LMA .... �� ■■■■ Landon, Moree & Assoeiates, lnc. Gvll 8 Envkonmental Englnesrs - Planners - 8urveyon i16]3 Y.B. 19 NORTH ��lY IYpBOR RAMM�D� NW Monu 1]3111Y9S010. Fan li3)1]B).11W. TW F� tiaW6xaWo W W W11�11F.IIOR.fAM EB MOYB �� '�' � �� - �s �� ALL ELEVATIONS REFER TO NAVD 88 DATUM �o+o*�*o�+��+�� UNLE88 OTHERWISE NOTED OuOPYRIG�T�2o13 sur�oqo��u.cESnxo ununw n ;w �`� um� �aE ur,o� pm[WSIe[FO�cc�ihw GwOaH.vPOVOS[.oEwu[ ��oo� ue[�� PLANINDEX '1. COVER SXEET 2. EXISTIN6 GONDITIONS 3. SITE PLAN 4. PAVING� GRADING, DRAINAGE 8 UTILITY PLAN S. DETAILS 8 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 6. DETAILS SITE DATA �wxu� �o �� os�aa+sa��aeanaoso a our�w0000-a�oocoo ww.-�eencH ev cesi�� a�A��P�o��<,s�,o s.�AES, o.a E,z�ROS��,E,�E.,w..E�„��:,,��.��s, eu�oincSEiBr.GxSFnOni t5,5ro[�iaMlS��sBjFrttwa-in�auLLOV��srynip� ewsnra co�n�mrr: sr w.ou� �n o�r s SFO.ow� .o.woaexsPnce.c��s nmmsi s eosa.� i mu oveN sw,ct_..�i� s.��aax� �YIN111fi 11EpU111EMF1RM wt�aUNrts•bsPACEs «�,�s��F A..E�P ,=,o�,o��EE.F� ,,.�soEP�.EO�FE.�. � . � - - - - - DECEMBER 10, 2013 �oer ss�-oz.000 cw�ex�c sc,�e � .'., � � w I I � YF9F �� p�iM�� I 5 � �I 1 f" �a'I 11 N �� 1 II � II � I I ii ii I� II II 11 II II � I II 1 II � 11II 1� 1 I � �, , �� '� 1 ; '� 1,�„ � I i i � i i � � �i � ii � ii i ii � 11 1 11 11 I II s\ 11 11^ 11 1 I I �) I I II II 1 �f` I I �— 1 I �ssc a rax �-�-� 1 I I I I� � II � ii ii rr---i --tr—� i ' �� i 3 Q7 �r"i t'% � I i I {�ii �� -➢G i�i/ ii i °� rn �� . a. d.a-1- __ `�, '� � � �I -NO � � '� "' • i� � _�` r/ � � � R I I r A' � z �'� '� R�' � �I.� � � I �� I p �� Rp i �� /� �1 �i i� ; I p 11 II � �� :d"}� �� ii i ii �� i�i / i i i / II •� v�� I I/ I I �I II^ 1 II 11 �� III 1 'V{� —5--� i i �� i i i ii �..•w....a,..�� .i�i��---i ----*� i s� � � � msc .n -- � � � � s�' _ � � i _ saiMl �--��, 1 r`t l 1 �%/ ia�£/ / � xv.-t�r(p ` � � � I �/ � ii cm, r cas � I i; � �;i'� I I 1 � � � d4:,�" I J u STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENT{ON NOTES . �.�....m .�i .�.��...++a...r+� .e... a w.., ... w..c..e �, ti�..w. .�d`�.'r w.0. a u. mrnm. a�w.+r�/rra wr ........ ................ �... �....�+ a� � .°"+.°"�:..w � �.ew °" .� w': w �. �.�.�i° � .:..:.:� °.a ....�. . ..�.ti�.�.a .. .+-.-i.. ...-+ �...-� �.....�...y � "°' : w°"�a`� �.� � :.^ti`. .�... r."°'. `.� � ..' e:� :'� y♦��Yw ��s�ui + s ma�i m�� wn a w M 1sb�� . wr �e V� b d`s�Y w re� sr� w w e� bYw wli� q� wM�.Yw �Ytl M 14 � x� `y 4I � ri p 11 tl �r TWO STORY C.B.S. I! �" � 673 BAY ESPLANADE ' + , LO[$i F100i Fl[V. = S91' ` 1 4F�1 I p � i �� f� III � i�` � �� r1 �i1 ��°°° / I � ,�1� 1�`�'�'=�1� °"� : � '�°.��..; ''�. �_ , ��a_ _ ., � �, — �_ .� I5' �`�- �'� � �-- � -------b��-� - p��` e i � i _�...� mw �.. i � � �y-_______- I � �� ______________J � II � 9 II y� e�w I III�� I Ili I � I r l I� I�Ij L___�.Y 1 yw 1 � wK �J am � � �� a, � .•• � I � � , ,s > • � x 1I ��, °,,"'a� �.� 1 av. �.) ar /'�' n�wrt. � x c � / ° I ,a / I �. � � I I 9� ONE STORY C.B.S. 667 BAY ESPLANADE loKSt ROOrt FIEY. - Sbo' � /: �.'� � �'�� u� .�.� _,.� °:� �"— �' = 7CC�. ,� ° �� .� I II I �� ta �_�°'� — INSTALLING A .. FlI RT oR.j V�7. � u E ' � ' _�� 9 _� � � �� _�_ w��__�____lyl II'I �____y � �I� II � � �� I I � � ONE STORY C.B.S. � � y i��'� I I LV1E51 FLWi FIEY. _ S.IU m I I j III I I � . �!j �� I I ' � lill� LECExD � -,. �.� . - �.a e- ion ea[ -�aeiaxa B - Mp IEpI - -�-an.c — — — _ 0'BF/0 RS ��- NY �� — - 0 �� t� � ZONE "AE" �P� (B.F.E.= II') Gy � m.:> ., ��tl-_—_________________ ...J.._-9f �� . � � T� "�_'"� _ 0 . { � : t �--'e' �o ._ . , T_ � �.._ �� ,� � :: : � � -�-�- ` _� ° ..: r�- = �=-�-� . �......r ............. �.� �7 ........ o... � — °R3"'7 � � �� .'°��e '� INSTALLNC A '4 INSTALLNG A Fl TFR� nRlu LT N FILIER FABRIu SILT FENCE '��°�'+�" _`�� EXISTING CONDITIONS W �' U dl U J j �a w a�� m m �a� � � � �W� p 3 ��a N Q c�< �aU Z U �m m � g��t �ji �� #�! B 2 OF 6 GRAPNIC SCALE twev�� ..-�0 2 I �� I �� N � �� , �� 11 Im II �� , II II 1� II 1 II II I i� i� 1� II �i i� ii i� � ii 1 ii � �II 1 1� II 'I I � 1 I 1 1 1 �1 I 1 � � �� i �� ii � ii i �ii i i� � �ii i ii I �i i i� ii � � i i II 1 II �� i i � � i �� ,i �� i � � � �ii � ii I �� ,� ;�� ; � �, �,�, �,�� ; �, I R �,, ' \ � � - "� ° „ , ' � --` � � ,�� _, � �� , 11 '� a � �I u-, ', ; , � � � � m�, -�o � iii x r i i� i � �'1 y i jl I � � z 1� i� i J fi ➢ i�� '� p �� I I� ° �1 i ii � nl 1 j / � 11 11 il I'� / � i i m..K. i � � i 'm w� � I .I �1 II �� i I 1 1 I —� � �I I I I � I I � I I � � 1� � �I /�� j� � � 1 F � ll - _- ; ; --__, , , , - , „ � R�� ; ; �, �, ; , E�.,� � ,;;, : i�/ ,� i ,, . iio —______'____''_______J � ��11�,3 M I + li + II + TWO STORY C.B.S. �i; 1 � r � 673 BAY ESPLANADE ' tl 1 �a�¢r nom u¢v = s.or � �i i Y r � I11 I1 � �1 i`� i 1� �i� � I 1 Yj� O� /m" , ��m, �` i \ � � �� J "�- , � �" 1 ` � � �. � � w' � �" �.-' � �i i i i, ��f I ��` _�- � ------ fi �---- -� � p �4- � � � i .�.w�om.� i � n �i �� __________________________� A III 1� u r---� � u .� 'i, .�,n ii i �� i 'i � ' ,�+ �---J r ti,-� ° ', ,r. ��t-- _-------------- i 'm i � ;�. � �� mvm�mRC�u� ��r.rm u� U IECEND m - tILVAIpI'� • - Pp�l q[ - �.Q ro� - o�[a`Rio �es ..- � R �� L � -- e �' ___-- . _.- . � r �. I I Y=�� .� �__ __� �___� 1�-'��--�' � .�� ----�-- __ � ----------- --- — �_--_,� I I / i ��. ..,�� ---- m. �� i ' �� ,�� i i `� '� �'" ;;; ,, , ,� � ONE STORY C.B.S. I � ONE STORY C.B.S. I � h�'ili � I 667 BAY ESPLANADE I � �o+cn noaw Euv. = s.w• � m ii i i i / I LOCSi ROPI FIEY = SBO' I I I i� i �� _�� i � � � �I SITE PLAN I .. a;� i'. : ;x; a== o.> .�- �_° � .� o;, U'�- ~�: ��: F'': 0- _' i : � z� an a� � a9£, � �x �� ti � « L = J.� d) U¢ J j � w n�n q m �� w �N� Q 3 00° � Nmi N � <� ¢ �. U ❑ R � � � �� z . �� Q3 i 's4' � �=� �� i`� 4 a � S 3 E ; oF s GRAPHIC SCALE .e..��,o�o.,a...h,..�. .a.��,�.....«.. �,..,.....+. .-.4,+.w.,,.d.. " I Y��arl• ..�....., e.�.... ..i.� ti....r.��.,..a..�...n.........ww�...,.o-..w..�. �w.row..�..w -w �� o n ' ..«....,..n.�h...d.,.,�..�..,..,.........e.�..e.._. ..e......� �s....""°:;°.:�"'"...w.`r. =°�'�'�" dgg � . � . .w "`..w.,�...W....� ..�.....�.�..�.........w.....�.....r..,.m....ti .' �r.,.�.,..�.a.�......�....d. ��' N�...�r•v:....n ..°°�`.r...:"°... �03 � I , o¢� �_� . � � yy �� .V' � LE�E�� E�$ _�p,,� �i�w .-w..� :°°; _ �:. - IfPMFY M91E61 I F � , . ' .. . — . YtR IFmI _ I o �� -1-ORR i� 4aCU0 RS � . ... 4��. .__ _ I 1 k R 1 � 1 �. � � I 4 , . - , i ' . ' e . I se " I' � � � � , F c � ,,` ` � " �i 4Vy � u.a �� 1 �p 'A � .. �_... .. 4 � I K's � � ,.� " � � � �. �+r � a $ � 4 1V. f ne {Fi��- � \S � .. � . . .. A: 3 � i \ 1 y'�� ;+ A , y� 'q , j no�wrn M �'va�[ `�� p€ e� �S' 1o��Y�q l�M�,artIP) ' . � � \ � ; wsai M�t Rco� ' � ws m . � . w<ra,.� . � ro. ry.o�� . u .. Ynl Ye 1[B1 �Y •y ! �Y T � �� !4).�'WHA� __—_I � � , __.a . . . �:� � ,.. � OR.� �J� IO��m1 �`___ W �Y s�e�aw�si A A I jt . �e ;� . . ' O. . � �.; _ .%� ..e � � .: _ � �� . ... . y�R:t.� . .. . . �, � j�' � ._ -w � �/KV�s �'o oo� �is r 4 I � ws�q sr ` � _ '/ao _� ftr wwa �a�[ � Ya W I+ae � rm p � C -. ++ t �. #0-4�_! / �� . ��_i,, � .o,. C O m,.oawe.«°�aa' ��°� � � - g ��3� � �" � �t-y �.'�� ` n'�iii ots 1 � 1 „� 41 U J� � �.. ��`�� t, i V'°. m' �`as.na�.ia �. ' � m ��N � c �s.c. a� . � �� :, x - �� a, "� ak� � , .onr �.r.' ao y K � � $ lIMYIOt � � f '�5 a "'�:�f �'r 3.� ~ � �� 'b X� W�iLLTA11r �f<Ilpttli�9� _ � w �ww �... I / t " � � ;I� �� ` a � 0 00 ' I �.,� " . �. 3 c � � �I' I, � � L �� . '' e E:. i�me ni[� m wn .arrip��ii �i.ivw�uor� C w 7 V" �, � 1_ �" � 3 � z o ' * "' �� 1 � ;.�.^�, .� .�.�o�.�,:• Z U �m °�'e.�°'�as.e,iioaasn. �, e � ��.. �.n.�.�scw.�....i..m+.. 41 iY � {. _ _ �a..es. im.. raai w a.sw Q �G .-a..,.:,e,.-�y � � ' _ '°� �` � F � �w�w : �ps � � . . _ .' - '�� - � � �'�� -- y �� **}. / ! .ar suor�ur . ,. � � wa.srw � � n _ .. . % . � i J i oss wa z.w� . . �°�en�.ow.u...ow..w. .,.,y � �. . wa. Y iaL: w 6. i � � ir�n� A .. i � u .. . �, <u, � ; """ , _ , � � � i� � �� . ; � �.��a� � a�� g� �� a, d.�..�Q��p � � �; , , ,��.�,..o�,.E�..�� .,.� .�a.�, , ��.,,�,�� , �,�d�, �� .w.�..��aM�_n..�.M.o...��..�� ., ;o �,a�..�.�,a. ��....,.��.��.ro�.a.��.� �� ,��.o �m,�,��.�.M.� �.�.,. �,�..�aM�.�.�..�.�.�an �� W,� ��n�,��Kp� �� ------------ -------J.n .n ��e....�. �a ,wa w+o nav � w i m.a ru r rae. ..s"°'^�m° �.� A"am.�a�°m �� e�� o.no �� a. mc ,v �.. .a no. a..0 snue... w`w` a'�°.��c.a :n: w��.�-W",..x .w�.. ��.K� a.�. � -�.a. n nv. nor.... wi.r I � � �. � i orr. wcc w�w awa nav. w.o s�� .�.oc �..�n.n.s aw.: .m.:ti.u. mom n o�xa I v�wc �i �� I __'l -'_ __ __J � � � �f o a ru .mr wrm wu z nm uscar m swwnwia vxa*. `�� II� _______ �� xor�mswrrts�/ nv. no�w� aaFSnouero� � � � m �wo m�uns Nvw �nU � J � .. �,w a w.w ro a aw � wv-�. � � maMr ra r�aao R,,r.�, �q sECnoN n-n � ��:� � SECrION ea ��°° °M�°tl �� ` E°°� � 01MpO ALL ELCVATON4 REF[R TO NAVD N DATIIM '�Ti ��° secrwncc UNLESt OTNlRWIlE NOTED O u�rac�RsuM�EOt3 �u 5 4 �:�.�� °�`"�"•�°"�° PAVING, GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN E T oF s � 6r ipil ■< < ■ it• �i o e= i rr � r e c e rrrelt�rrr v vo r:sr= r e sr.• �v• •re r n !��?O i �� i�}' � �t� j�� I; t; �I, [' tl�. i��' ��' i` 1'� t' Cf� 4� f= t�, << �" E► �.! t� t�. �` �: f: ` i` j` fj , k i; � �.'�, Il� !'_ `'i t' �I I[ }�r� � i� 14p [e�� i} { �y_'l r �`�'�= 1� �;` � `tr� !�'�I y t1�( ; �� i' '1i �it � j�� i lb itoF� ��1 ! 1� F rl ll } • i 1 7 4 �11��' � t � lj � i�r� Fi [ � t� � � ! ��,• � y o f �! � F �t �� i�'�� j�I 1� �� j1 �. �, � 1 I � r+ �� 1 I � 1 �� •� l I' �f � , i 1 ,� ia �� z p�F(%� < < �� 1� �`�� I �{ � f{` � �I € r�St< < tta t r �� -1 } 1 j I �� F f ft• � �� F' �� r 1 � �t . �� I � �� { (� � � �� i c 1! � p F 'r ` J, �f � � � � f ft lI jt i it t t� et 1 f� �`` i,' � E< < f( ( i F� l� ll.t { �� 3 S1 = 1 } Pji f_y �� !� 1� l� �l1 l� 5 ii. i'�� q • i� `� F� �r r� ��r' � I 1� � ' r �� h� !`� ' �— e�[ �� Pr � rt ! � F � 1� `: �{ �T •+ �• T � . � (• � i1 � j� � F . 1 o t( z t 1 t � r et tr ! r r 1��1 �� ' •• ' ti%� ` F f! t t : I ��a�� [ It� �it Ill � 1( t I i �� e er �� r � � f•1 � t•T ��t � � r e i�l t•�F t��1 I•• j� �{) �i�� (� �� It� Ft� �� t. �.B�°m� 3r � �F. 11 1 ( � ��o �!li �� ) i�fi�i �i�• .;�I`" �� i1 i. � F i r� ' I�F�� i. 1�« _ � i � j' T h � � � t� s � � r, �j 1 { � ! �� ! 1 !� F < `< d'� � ! 1 � f+� � E t << � � E', j'i, k; � �p�� o�' �� ti� rr� f�l ��t il tit 1 �f : tl�j �1 l�P �r �; �{ x t. p4 li �! Il �t �� j� �` i t i t � f� E� � � �� f �.� � i �° r t�P I— �, f� r} �il t x. j�. }. [�t s ie ,t �� e �� i 1 I � 1 t 1(i � � � �� k ► E F �� r �; I� i� �, �� .�, I� ,, � ., << �,�1E. � .�, ,�� : f e �� j ��I 1 �1 , r k i�� !� ' j� �� E� �i � h1 �'� i�� :�I k�� .1 ��fi IF l � � 1�� F I�! 4� '� t l I� � f �� ft '1 I f��''� E� i F ;� �� 1 � �.1 ?�E �l �E 1� 7 ie�l� j � ' � �� f � �� et r � � ��"1� f � �� i � j t� ��1 � �' i� i �� i'{ ` � � } U ij�` � � #� ` t� 1 � }� E�i �c � � ' i i�l � �� {}f �1 �I i� :! ��o � �'� < < �� e s � � ; i� f ; �i `+ � �� a`- ! �{ f f �I ii � f< i � � i �� I � Ei A i ; �� ay � �; � ;,i �� t t� If � �, it! ` '!, ' I '< <, � ; ,s ! � ; I! (, ► � F I r t�; � ,• , < <� �; � �� +�'�, i ; ! i ; j � � ;� �� j � i �' ji� �ti � 'i li �i ri � 11 r� � i i � ; �i{[ I r ;x � � F �� F � ! �; tj! i �� t � �� i { !(� � � � �l 1'�} � i j i � r { � �}� 1►� � k E; {� � tl �t F I� �� tf) i �� IF � I q �� 1 �� f q:�' i F f 1� �1 �� d �'� iE ; � � j�, �} , ,i � tI ! f{� r 1 i �� I t { ti � ►l+i ��r fIf(t t� r l�j l il ►� }i s�� J E� �jt<<� �� 1j},�. f} fF F �� t e�f � � �!�� , � l � i 1 1� �� j i} 1{ t� 9 � ��} t{ i 1 i � 1� 1J E � �� t E� 1 < < t � r ,� 1 ! If t ii�—o r�cc c: rc.cr:s•.- ( 1��1� � }�= 1(e T�� f � i� � q r � � 1 j Er 1 t{ �� x �r :: �ry; r:` c n 1� rr �� • 1]" il�'t q t` s ! 1 f' t t' � r, r- � i i r• � 1� i,<<I � �� 3 t�� ( !1 r� : �j I� i � � I( �� ; s �(EE ` �F }( �' }1►' 1 { t�� li �{ � � ir� � t►� � �� .l`�1►�1 il'I ��" F�a �i� I 1!�<<:�►1� r��1i1, f� ��€•<<•II �• ' ��I n�°�� I 1` `: t' ►•�<< ►�: ��;�f� f=� �� I� c�f q:i'.�► Itj► i�� E:Ft<<j '� f��i��Ik !� ��f�l�t �+�1�,� �F, � Et ltf � p �� j 1 �� t j r � t�I , t ��6 1�1 r� jl t�� «.� ��} �� k � ' �) et[�'} �� # r �i !}� t ��t • � !1 T� f !j �' ! � i t � ( ` �• < <}c1�1 !• �t} I ,r'lF � a � F� � I�� .c; �., i t� � [ '1`: '] } e�t �t{'�S f91� f� i �i � i� j� � 1 � I# � I � �i i� !j[�}) I} �!}�t� � i N�f ( f j; I 7 r'� f�181f (�`rk �� j�t� �� 1�� r� 1t�b �� jp E � F + �i f � 1 i � i � �l � ( �. � �r"�� il � I F i � � � � � �• t' 1 ��; 1�4111i�1i�}i �� t�' � {°:3i � 1 � ! y f � j } � � t �� (" Ef ��Ef fr I . ��h . I B!� I� � t 4 � � � �� l�y;��{ Ij �� f � J �� > € ii� ' � 1 � ; 6 ; i i 1 � 'I � l� I ' �E ; � I : P : �I� r i ; ��' '�' �t) E��il�"i'� E� E r i i'�I�'^� j' r�.��(� �� + � ft ��,.�� .�;1� �<< �� rt,�•��.►��,j I-� 1 1 r � 1:[ � I k� � �.E eri�iF'[ � �ii fi �� f� � �# � �� , (i � � � . � �} �! �� l� �� e � � � �.{ 1 i ` e � j� � li �� i � 1 �� (� }er � . , t i �t f I. 7 t� j� 1� i" � f I p � jt f ��1 � T�t � r� � F i� �� ) i� � � �# i 1 } I t � ( I I( ,� �. l � ! .€ ► yt i r � f , tt ;`�� !,'f t► ' �i {��it �� ;i� � j' f� r 1.� � � f i li y y' 1} 1; i( 1� f11 1 I�� r!� �� i� � f �i� ��1� 1� ` i t l� t� j�;, i j�� i�;� i��'� E'� ' r 1i�; 4� 1�, t► I,►��<i<;; E I l.; I f,�;! t! f t t� " 1� � �' � �� i� ; lj r J(� !�,} 1 F j I';: i) � f;,[�:+ 1 l � � (� !! �� 1 �f �i , i{ �i;Ei�1�� :� �i'�� ( { (�i }1i��h ��ii,�6 �; �fii!;i'i? ,i; i ! �,e, � ��II�'f�l �� 'o� �� i! + � °�� °� `�i��p��,,�i a� �� .i � 1 ��f ( �� I t!� {� j .., n I��I ,I i�� i1� v E, � � � �� ; �j� � Fj,�'�1�� t- �� , � 1' il�� ,; �= R�� iit � �� f �j �� ; I q�t i` �, �; _; F j � '� �il 0 �I i: ��1 p'�, y` ' „ t F, t( �ji � � � • a � � � � ' - t rri � i�� i * � � � � � � ; F '8� r �� ' + ; ilf �� t � a' �� r ' { � i n' � , � y � { � I I ' �� +� $ i �� j� � '�J4i � � F °: � a ; � t �i! 1 w r ;� � � . �;t z � s �L 1 v ;� ' �.�— e � O c` � �� : � � Z � �� 7 � Tr4-�T � '� � �i� � T� SI � �L ' �m � 4 �� 1 � �� B' � -II� . �-,.,,. w ' C " � a ga � . n ;a r�?– : � � (� � ;�s :p . r . 1j s m , . E � :�� ai �a = T! � z� � �l '< <I T a " r� � . Z f ;; f -I I->,T ; � � � °— — � ` i ° Z P + " ��'� �i'� �� ti O ;� `[ �i;l+ �p� I �:E > � � � � '! ;; ��;; i� �T I. m i , � ;� � � "'"'"_" ��MA `°�` DeNunzio Residential �"°^ �• ^ 4� o �,,, '" � T ��4� CLEARWATERBEACH op�� o. , s a� N °'� K� �°��' DeNunzio Group, LLC a�°�°� "°"° � ,� 305 CnMBRIDGE STREET SURE 3 NOTICE TO CONTRACTOfLOWNER w (iiij�p i . : � (ii��m- GAMBRIOGE. hM02141 '_`�"' l l iis,�zi_ �_r.r.a_,'.�' �„ a_ _ �� - ��. 1 �a-=_F_=n.= : �.s.�ar __._' � � � � S -- �?.. _ ` ��ssr —�r �� - �'! —"� - ,� � «� TIc� e-� ;.�-- T� � � ' •• •} � �� •�_ ^� __ 1_� �a�. .'rr'.}se.i rl � �,�,Q; . _ O L..'.'F'^r` .. � ��iG" .RL'�4�:iL L� � •ailiif:� \. ._ _ �� • r• o �rauummrs� �sm.a��`°""-,� ��.•� _� ��.o. �.,.n „K ae��n. -- mwart rin Pi.w� - (iw)��.rr �Y.'..q�c.�r � T) �r_wrYir�aw N�I I/ I�If�i.�N ' = ° `_. N.+ ; �`°`""..e. "° •u...i+M. ... �w�........ .. a.. _ �. w �,.:, � ` �=��`� ' �� r � POND UNDERORAIN OETNL � � ,xx�x:�s�- � 1 ` '. .�,.�. .�. .. . � ��°�B d000v`ov cioo0caoo r�uucie:ior-. I. I: � � IY 11 11 II � 1 f � 1 ii i ii ii �� i �i i � I l I i I l ��i i II ii ii ii �i �� - „ �� „ „ �� !� �_'� �1 I � • � • � I I 1 a 1 F t ��:� ;.v':'„::i\ � fr_��+r\ \r m ��+ �r� �..�Y O �.a..� CH�ORINAl10N�:AP ^��— —I��.�,., ___.mi-• �� }�as�r._� O =�=M�_-- � - � ii}ri_ "_ t�_�'�'�� '- ��fi�'!3Y]H�ii i -,—.- __---�------- -� � �� '.�I � -----. 1 _r1n L] � r h.,. ' 4�- - -� �- r1 ---�----f====,;,'�i _ � � _ - - �----J - _--- � !I!1�_ PROPOSED TURNING TEMPLATE u.uc i- �o I I I I ! 'I°- Q� � .a 4p � �— � . e...v ' � (M�t � �� TYPICAL METER SE75 W/ BACXFLOW PREYEN7ERS 1-1 /Y k Y YO�ELS 19.00 }.00 11.00 P raat wdin zoo Tratk : 6.00 Lxk lo Lock Time : 6.00 Staering Angle : J7.6 PASSENGER VEHICI E SPECIFICATIONS � � � � � � �a 8�$ ^� F 8J �� ' U Q) Ua J j ,� W nu,: y m �wo 41 � �a� � F �w� O Q �oo � N�� j� �s< C w � �" Z U 0� d 0 � i � J ��$� Q n �R � /�� A ��°� ��'}�� "'�= �� O .`-�f S DETAILS E oF 6 I I_NTERNAL LANDSCAPE VUA REOIIIREMENTS INTERNAL WJDSCAPE VUA AREq REQUIRE�: 10R OF VUA PNRKING AREA VUA ARFA: 0 SF - PARKING CARAGE WRHIN BUILDING REQUIRED VUA lANpSCAPE r1REA: 0 SF (10R % 0 SF) PROVIOE� VUA LWDSCAGE MEA: 0 SF (OR) 1 TREE RE�UIREO PER 150 SF OF REpUIRED INTERN�IL LANDSCAPE WA NRFA: �/ 150 = 0 TREES REQUIRED TREES PROVIDED FOR INTERNAL LWDSCAPE VUA AREA: 0 TREES SHRUBS NRE REOUIREO FOR 50% OF THE REOUIRED INTERWIL IANOSCAPE VUA AREA. WITH REMAINING AREA COVERED BY GROUN� COVERS. NOT INCLUDING 500. EXISTING TREE REPLACEMENT REOUIREAIENTS E%ISTING TREES RATE� 3, 4, AND 5 PER CONOITION RATING SUMMARY ARE TO BE REPlACEO AT 1' OF REPtACEMENT FOR 1" OF EXISTING TREE REMOVED ANO Pr1LM5 ARE TO BE REPlACEO NT 1' PER PALM TREE� TREES RAiE� 1 qND 2 PER CONDITION RATING SUMANftY DO NOT REOUIRE REPLACEMENT. OUALIFYING TREES REMOVEO: 0 TREES O 0� REOUIRED REPLACEMENT OUALIFYING PALMS REMOVED: 0 PALMS O 0' REOl11RED REPtACEMENT TOTqL REPIACEMENT REOUIREO: 0' REOUIRED REPIACEMENT TOiAL REPIACEMENi PROVIDEO: 0" TOTAL (NO EXISTING TREES ON SITE) REOl11RE0 PERIMETER lAN�SC>PE BUFFER� NORTH BUFFER (ATfACHEO DWELLINGS RND LIKE USES) RE�UIRED: 10' WIDE BUFFER WITH 1 TREE PER ]5 LF k 100% CONTINUOUS HEDGE 109.95 LF / 35 = 7.14 = 3 TREES REpUIRED PROVIDED: 10' WIDE BUFFER, 9 PALM TREES & 100% CONTINUOUS HEDGE + GROUNDCOVERS SOUTH BUFV'ER (ATTACMEO DWELLINGS AND LINE USESJ REOUIRED: 10' WIDE BUFFER WITH 1 TREE PER 35 LF @ 100X CONTINUOUS HEOGE 109.53 LF / 35 = 3.13 = 3 TREES REQUIREO PROVIDED: 5' WIDE BUFFER, 4 PALIA TREES & 60R CONTINUOUS MEDGE + ADDIiIONAL SHRU85 k GROUNDCOVERS EqSi BUFFER (WATER FRONTAGE) REOUIRED: 10' BUILOING SEfHACK PROVIDED: 1D' WI�E BUFFER, 3 PpLM TREES, LOW HEIGHT SHRUBS k GROUN�COVERS WITMIN WATER FRONTAGE CLEAR SIGHT TRV.NGLES. WESi BUFFER (STREET FftONTAGE) WIDTH PER OLD FLORIDA. BEACH BY DESICN ftEpUIRE�: 10' WIDE BUFFER WITH 1 TREE PER 35 LF & t00R CONTINUOl15 HEDGE 59.66 LF / �5 = 1.] = 2 TftEES REOUIRED PROVIDED: 10' WIOE BUFFER, 1 IARGE SPECIES PALM iREE + 2 ACCENT TREES & t00R CONTINUOUS HEDGE + ADDITION4L SHRUBS & GROUNOCOVERS AI�IL�INC FOIINDATION InNDSC<PE REOUIRFNENTS FOUNDATION PLANTINGS t0 BE PROVIOED FOR 100X OF BUILOING FACPDE ALONC STREEf RIGHT OF WRY, E%CLUOING PRFAS FOR BUIL�INC INGRESS AND EGRESS. MINIMUM 5' WIDE WITH 2 ACCENT TREES OR 3 PALMS FOR EVERY 40 LF AND 1 SHRUB FOR EVERV 20 SF OF REOUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA. 50% OF 1ANDSCME ARE4 TO BE SHRUBS WITH REMAINING NREA TO BE GROUNOCOVERS. REOUIRED: i].8] LF BUILOING FACADE / 40 =.45 .45 % 2 ACCENT TREES = 1 ACCENT TREES REOUIRED (OR 1.5 PALMSJ 1�.0] X 5' = 89.35 SF REOUIRED IANDSCAPE PREA 89.35 / 20 = 4.5 = 5 SHRUBS REpUIRED PROVIDEp: 1 ACCENT TREES, 1� SMRUBS AN� 125 SF OF IANDSCNPE AREA WITH REMAINING AREA HAVING AODITIONAL SHRUBS & GROUNO COVERS I 1 I 1 / ,�� ii ii 11 11 �„ 11 1� 11 1I 11 � I'1 11 , 1 1 11 II 11 11 i11 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 III II II II 11 II I�i rs�sr I .smavl I � � I � �� „ ii ii 11 �� 11 11 I \ _ _.�/� �w- � � -__� / -__� /, /� /� � � ) I �'� �1 ;O�_,—��,_ �' ,Z ,_'� ; , r ��s'1� 1 J � � ��1 ` � ��/ ' o � � �� , - _ g -- �4_�____________�r______ � ��n �� i; ", i� � i! o j� n �i �� m �� ➢ I � I �1 �� II �� 1I1 I�I III �i � 1 1 I�I ��_�� lil 11 I�II� PLANTSCHEDULE Tarrc r y o_ GRLLI S5L SIZE 3 Noelo p e 9�1n Evar9laEe Polm - -i6' H. 8-10' S 3 p eenow�ana Pineapv�e cuovo iree - ] ccl 9'-i0' Ht.. 3-a p � �� Sono CoM lo is ci, vo.�.a f5 Homelo potena C po W Dwf.MFre B�aM1 g, 20'+3D'O .l' oc JB ycan��ea �mga ¢ pwn's SbDMr qoi., 30'wf0'O ]' oc 1] PaEO o oua ma v Y e PaCac ry e g, s:f0'O 3' oc 9 Stre iza �re e Bire OI Poradiae 3 qal.. 20'�30'O ]' oc ypyI ]] pe muvcari 'EmemlE GaECasv EmerolE GaEese � iope 17 �IB : 1 901.0 IB ac 20 Zoma pumiM Coonlie 14 � IV. I guLO 31 oc :�� K'�`'.y�•,ba�r" '��' � a� ,� £ scue i- in NORTH �� crs s�u �� g "�� a �mg� J O_ m 7 � O o �i N og � �E z sa y � � E � . t � � �o E 0 ��a a O �a ds N � � LL ❑ V Y F p�right - D�oxinga onG co pte y t be uaea, conaVU<leE or ap uceo �M1M1OUf xriften p iuion iram RoCmson Feaource p. �C. N Wiw��m. m m�ynia�a w n. . 0.n.. �'�ty°� u� r� u�.anaa rw�v :. e > e er u. [mex�v t. ud� nemn+. ww .iiWo4e s�'mwy �n�j� imp �iadN �io �rvw�9u�.� m nm- la�e� .iu ur� �lmevm. °� �a numi� num Y a�nt M1 Y Feu�nt r� 9 rmm emippw a a �u�ux � n�aaem4 m u� w ma wi o.er mIr wo�mw a� worw n�n� 4 atsi ��maryem M��ww ie��• m�1�un1gM Pr�'"o}�t .4cw�onm '� �'� mw+l�oz� mor a ut�ne�f wwy. t� luo �mon� �m w ywnw n u� �nnex� °y �Y m�e n�wi Me / v m�il�eml �w qm� xme�d ar Weuolm ol it�m avm mw b pMwhe unr q�dieotly ouxonua e� u� ln� pmt ibl o� nom m u� pm� b Iw tne fmtru�tv'a inrvmou.� Wr � no pwrw�x s ear�we �r Ynqlu w� aumuuw �nom IMM w •m�n w uot me irt s . nw emvx�u nuY e� ou yv.t mowa mo�n m w n orv naurce n w rmwetw � pb. W�t�. oi mi m.� .n�per a"°'..��t �u �.:s� v` w„-�� <wM."��°"�'�� ,o-.. ..a ..o� m�a�m.. �., �� .�� e. w � a�.�m..a s.,,�,,, r o .,.�,�„�,. ��,.. �..a .�� w � �. a� a4..�� a'" :y $;"4 dd�m � ��,� �,a:.<"e'" a a .... , �,�.... ' � � �w � � � '� °'" o�' �d u: �a � �' wm� m<� a'." -, °"bi .or a o. �w �. w. ,.,a..� � w �K "�.� °'� .w,� o.,.. �� e,_ m�.,..� ,M s,�.. ° � �,� � �c :.. � :..�. .� �,a �. ,� �.. �. «„a ma oo.,�... .""�.`»�� .� �. �.w�u., .g�m „e M.� ma.,d. �YCZ� �.e. a��.�,Nm q. w... > a�. ..a e.� a.�:..4.�,au» m. � ~.:"� u.�`°�� '��5,.m� ow.�w. w�. e�. d4 � „r �w�� .n-..,a� »4 m,«�,. �P„�. m. ��w �a. ., q..e.��,�, o, «, a.,.:'."9`p" : w ,..e...�b u...�„m.,aa,�.. b .�o.r' �..�' �b ua v ��ese) mn amn� s� e a m. .,a,�,�W..� :� u�°a.':c°"�: wa +�....� w. ..�� w>.. ,i w o.�,.. e�.. d m a. �,.e .ia w. ew�.,. w.,w mr � 1�mt�na iA � (wi h da��°a q.".`m eu�, ma 8�.4da.mwm ,..a':,d. oo �,� a�. da o w. o�. ma �,�. � , o��s� q. �a �� m.°�.Ikimo� �mapu . v.e,M,tlww.�r,Nw ,w. a w=u n.x.rn q�. >�m• m� m„in.a a,� m.. etlw. m sw ,vb� � r� ,�< : � � � � o: �o m�,,.°, �",�;a m u: „ �,'��',"._.�».: ...� .,�,�. _, �,,,h9 ma..br �>.. ..,,. ;'� � as ,:�".�"�. , �;,.��: �.w;�a m�'�� ,e, °�°�:=„a � �," �"K � �S. , - . u...�.. m , m .m „ �.o �. �„ , m,.M� e, . ,.�. ,.M�a �:w.,� �o. �«� � .� r d. ..�,e.. „ �. �,.M :a�. o�. � � ..n ��.n .d e. �.., w .� w��K�v. e. ��: ..�. a�„a .�... w � �,,,. .� U. �. a �a .s. .,.� a aa.b a„� o, �. wow�'"°'..."d°a,�9.�.�,�«..� � ..a,,,. we �.. na. ry. ��qa'��,..�.��M�, d.w �a. a.: �.°'�'e"'. s� uwb�"°'t `°"".��d m� e u. �.. � �. � v � d .w .,. . � .. . . ., �. M°e "°« � M e 9 a ma� e� �e s �,. w"w�u. m o.. „. o su. a.v.m. moi.w..�u. a. -�m. oi �s °�° w'":"w-':. ,. m. �.�,s.�.a_, d_ �,.. , _a .� �_ .,� �„ s �m ,�„ .,�e,� e �.. e..,�,,.... �k, ,� w,.�.�.u.�� A� tl�a°:d �:ra�„ �.�;,��, : �;�a�,�:.:o ��, oa�.,o,.�� m.�°�a�s �.om.,. ma.m_b,� a,,.. W,S.. ti,...,.,.��.. .,, m_, u..,�o.� �:, �� . �w.,s .� .��. �: :� o, .� ,_ .�__ �. mo,.,,. .��o. � �.�m o, M,e�� mma�k w�enw,..u��d u um. n u�•�wc w Y> �. '0 ('�l nO1,•n �W . v�x aaade�e.iu a� n,n�w „w �.....e. „ u.s sw�ma. b. r.....r s,a: (wrs zeo,-,wo,rt` omr me sto.mm a xu,w. pmt,. �at_t .aua 'i, pw< mawa ,rw� a., .�„� diii�4 �tnmr�vaa'�xwa�n� nmm ��vv �ne�niw aa�nw n„ e r w..ne aw enrry aaw awa`a �e u�x �a x �m nmia nepe. ewami w� aa/n 'Y wo�u <roto'v. n� ne�• un �u� aw .0 M�mn�4=� a�. erv� moYwn wmu. mr4+„9 Yrot� nuct aunm�. n.u�� o� une� ow ]/� xa x aan�l� Nat w,. m„a a w i�°�'� w... (.�mn � w� w.. b) .ne om.... .mw m ra ..a�,,..nw e. n� x� eW. ma,.. a,e / s nwer (a�e: W�w��r.ya p� e.� v�y �na e�w� u n>m u� row �-� ��.gw �u.�� -,��.m�d� w r am Mx .�rpr� .,�uqw��a ✓ u. m�. n.an .n ma nv..0 ae�. vi �n. e.. me�.0 .w °.i w�. b P�etaa •ae � u ed • ont� a� m �vn.� rvm� rn one w e a�..m .ot� ma x ntvmbu'n�i F�wwt m� er a uv �.�,...a.��,.�'�°.� ...a�,a..a oCb«,.. ��.�a':m"'"R;':�m�"°��`�ao e��. a .a�. e d ..w..a o. . �� ma'"w � � °"� �..°°�..w: �"wia.dw�� m. am� .n�.m . �o oar w vm� �. �; ��, ; „�� .. m. o , � �, ,,.�. �. m�°m� �,�, .o,..'W �. �.�. ;'�� .�" �o��, ..,� a�,�. e a�, m,,,,,,4 �, �..a m, o,. m, e,wa n i� . m. ce.e:w. w�n e eeWi w�M w�w.� we rv.e�.�p m.�..n e� wuMm.�� ei ni ww� ma�.n. .en m. ma�r�w✓..at.�.rt er an�� u>.�m�ma... to n..mi .. s e r�w..�w. � ux ow�a .�w�� .n�.. .ww��a �er u,..�(3)�� .in .nei w n.. er .n�a.a. na`. a�.0 (� �aw•� ey u. a�.�) mai e..u�:.e a�a M.mir �o a u. r.- a.�t MeKis (xdt Am.�.. a. roc�o.a w•a) .�ni e w m o,po.iK a�m m sam.a er ma•�aw..+..�..m.m�e,. u. qvy � m ewp�au� m xe o a iw iwn n4mw. mertd� tn� a�md�� w ume metwai� a~�ans ae�ne �e w.me �e .iu.roa al n 4i� y� • w q�ta� m�wn u arW we - me n wu x. imm - rvwn nn:la r ab we �il G nF�tm Rslmiw inol �V�m�w �I�� oX� t� e eZ �w:�� a vowa m�Cr� Nie. Y ue.�..a er u� a.i.s. R�a'��eu�., er�. mro'�b.a rq��ion �� r.cx wtw. �w�..�iTN� Nat u�� n �mW��. n.s m�u b�vbtnq utlliq�lum�. m �� ol�p:[m�we m u. bx�kn eM. �vr. ��em.�m n MaWV :ewn. cmtxlv nal mae a uwwN �M�m� Y� b uuur �wcw�r..tc, m, wp nwwm�oaa�bauwtw� �� m ti r�n�+a� ru a w amni�i�wt �� at tM cmvx�n na e� evM eY u� canvan ma n�tlre t�w� a�e e� .� o m.,m.m fl�. �n �� .a, e, q,� -°�9= w�pa',„,�„� ru �"P,�.., ..�� m�.. a a..,,m � o�; b o"°'.,. d «�.. � ��.0 � �%so: G: °'�= : ° � ::M: eu�'�°^�.• ei:".K'.� � m.� m�. � ,. M � � aa'::'e �.� ,m�„""°'c_..� .�'.�m �.�..�� mu °,�'M� �„u. � �. a`a'w�.'a >r„�,o.�:: n��,�ir a�: e wws, m .,. .. . .� ..w..,... �e,.d. o „� ,��,. „ a�, ��'°'�_ m„�d..,. .<, a m.� .� � �„� �.a d',�. e:.�,. ,.b. ::x m;� �: �� .,. � .,N mm�,.�i„°�� : w �,��, o, �. �....4....�„�� e... �, „., �,�m. ��e�a. e...F� e. u. �. w� °��A'° � �.. � �,�� a �a e. "u."��,o .,�,� �..d,. m me...a ..,� a. w u. m�. ,.,� a«.. �.� �..� r� M..,.... �,��« ��..,.� .. a,� a m�.m o� a wo. m��,.a � a,. a...,"a� .w�a. .e ..,n_m-aA .�a w w.w e a°.r ,u..r ..�.a. 4,r mWa .,d� e. �... .,u. u,. w,� �.. a � � s' i e> �.�w.. o..�. s eu.. ea e. .nr.e e.r.,. > a sxe .iu v� � mor �.w.. u. erW iwn�q��. xM. w. m�. e�n m�ro��t w e �. M b a.am.iw �a Nm� 9�.u. iea.� ..w te aw� .m V�watm .�... �� r��.e w� �� e. ,�Mm w<am.�. <i �. �em ., .w..a.n«w a w>v a=��w w. �q m. w. o� � w� nem��i.m) a��n tlw w dr �e ... r � �.� :.a v rov�w .ww. s Aia o-�. ( ��: wwwp.. mn�a� w dr me :mwvr v<a. �...,n rs �a�er� ��w v�� (�V w �M �..,� (eq ro�,• �a �.� � o, �,' � w�: :'e s � e;'� .� �,� . �, �.� ��,. ,.._ �, �,�, >,e.,,_ �., ,. , �..a., �. a �., ,��m�„� m �, .� �� o � �.,�. . �� w,=a°a. �w�.., .,� ,. �� : ,.� m Ps, , - ,�, .,a aa . � o..�� r� ,,, a,,, ..,,,a�. �.. ' en r,m �,dwv m .,..a�.."wmme m�.i` o - =., ..�:, ,� � � a w.��',�� U `e� � °"cu �= �.°"w � '"mm�NO..� m,i. � � m..d .�> ..,,,„. � `��. �,�...,,.w�w � . .� i:o..b o;,� �' � m<,° �� mm� `d°,.,: N. ��"� a°'� s � i.�� .. m. o� .,,, ,..�rd. ,�... : w�,°: � .,"'�°�"�'°..�"".«.:�«` �� b':: . .. p , „�.� o� u... �» w.e w A- o.m�, w m a. a�w: :m. oi u am�`w w m::m o m., or .,m�v,� aN,. �o ndn .�i.. a o. q: °'°�"° a ,..� ,., e � �� 4'� �;•�;� �°�. .. U. �,��dKK• �: � �; �, :°° �.�.. �,�, �m;.��.� ;� o,� �,,, ��m��. A:m�: u. n,� � o-°. ��tl .,. w a, m. m. a.a� a�,,.M. .��.,�:° �;�e�::�a°a;.u.ew_�»,�,.��.,.a�.�_ . ,. ..� d .. .�.� � �°°°s� °.°",d° e.�u� .��.,.� .. �a .m, sw �� a .,�.w wia. .m w�ma � m��w� � "i..�d w�la ea ,�,� u.� u .� n«.. �,o mm .,�,. „ <.�,� �,..,. �. .. ,. o„� „ ,�.. �.,�,e �, �. �,.� .�� ,. ��. , ,.,,�.. ��. <�,�.. �„ .�t�:;� �a. ��. ��°�, �, au. �m��. a�da�� ,...�,. ..� m,��.. .�. a� (» �a wnmq en.��no u aw (a` ra � � �tdbkn Iw Mn w� P ra�ix�n nw �...e.n �iv o t� nui n ��%. aa wi wns me m�(�) �r �mrw�r ornw, me� mn. u� .arawwuw ��ew vq�we ma tl`u� uutmaaw�«�M. I�n��in'o� �s�eu.��i �a1�m mm�r rwe �e u. ruu �n> .u.Jmn �.aa.n. e��ma u. tmwe�e�. m�ea .�w ne� e� �r�a mt� �nu .e�• (r.• wumwa ncwna W. '•^ a� (io)am ppF�,� o �' � °�: ai >w�� mo�.d. �a .m ia o m. �, o.+� �z� ...�., �.�.�� .,.w.��,v ,.m,�m a xEaimrExn. sl OSn) m+ �$( m �iww[i z�um/ar �u TY%CAL PEflIMETER LANOSCAPE pETAIL f�� m � r �i� ` _ii.:;li.- ' ruov SXRUBPIANTING � ��m O�O� ip0 �p\. - 00�\� �� aOflp �I/ ��?`.�;o0a I% I � .�ita � _,' - 'O.: �:. t�a1i0��^� - �O:O.OY::O �:'5......� � -�.�. ._ . AY.O:O;O.O:Y?::�:O:O �„\ PIANT MATERIAL IAVOUT �ETNL u 11 T�� n y�� _� �� i i � �i. _ � � II�I .� . �..� . ='I�I - � ... �.�. ...... ,.. � �, �� rr�� -� r � r 1 1 �1 � � / II� ° ��. ��\ MULTI-THUNKTREESirll(ING __� e �,b_Ri z��9e � � � �-=� � 1a`L4 r � � ` ,I � � TYPICAL 1AN0.5CAPE ISIAND DETAIL � � /r\ e�� ,,. CiyCii� �.. U J a O � &o O '" � N a� Z �u � � �� a� f F �� 0 ��a a O C � v 4 o�� s € � F opplq�t - �ro qa anE co p y ol Ee uaeE, consc�ucleU w ep oEUCeE �it�out xritlen permiuion fiam ftooereon Feawrce G p. �C. IRRIGATION SCHEDULE � ��_�—��— � � � a a .��F ,�-PRa- z a' ro°w`�e; �,. P�PP p � °�..,9� �a; �o:" o,m� Presaurea � ulot'�ng �a0paE5BOeket Fibrtl 5-]Ogpm. R n Bir` MOCiPCAP 2 fit pa. forvnap�p Gk �ald uev. � n98iMUNNJ 2 �/a' 1�Y(SE Ooi)tn �•iM iru n�pelowByPxBT�e c.ime. m�. o,°...: c�:�ou, n m'm:`o°.`tiKKxoe�. ,_/''� � a.a �o'e K.n.po.� i.e. \ /� RFp Bir P09-IY (12) >9t ro. 0.9GPHCem .C. �L`�`/ DrPline la t I3.Ottopor��9.� flea�INOn��PUryb iuGing9for Non-POta01e Woter. STdB'!L L Fv/uOOFi /oFC[' H 0 R�` B� RZ%4 FI� n Con4ocfoi-GraUa ConN011er. In . For FeaiOentiol anE gnt Lommerciol Uae. � OWo`BwN Roin Senaor. Fiiet�nq qeela�imeE Service, MJ 1 Meter. V y P51 Moilapie FVC Cloee 2,00 irrqo�ion p�pe�au ]00 SOR 3t ---- i,.�e�re� ua�mm.. rvc s�n.aw. w -------- : �MC 5 40 TYP�cal��p mn9otian P PIPe aa�ytia auqh� Neir re P��"E�te 4 e e�n e � C�,ry�on g ving o ronebuc4on. r�YaN� IM�Mf / Wlw FIaM Wlr� Yiq ffi F�II1R! �� '� '� � �11��''I�� 1� (I 1 1 �S 11 I 1 � � 1 1 1 i� i ii i S� ��1 �I � II � 11 � 1� � II � � 1 � iF � fl'11 � � I �II �1 1 1 i rn 1 11 I 1' C/7 � �1'I � � 1 y ��I � � z � C �I�!�i i i � � � i�'� �� u=, � i� � 1 I� � 1 ." ��' ' ' �,;--� � —' � � ��,� �s�� / ��_ _- Q �1 � 1 f 1�i CRITICAL ANALYSIS woter � NBER Oorma4o�. �� 11 11 11 11 11 �1 I I i i i a � � �� „N � �� g�� ;O�_,-j �,, '� ,—� � �1 0 ' tl \ Z �t '° �1 J �� ,L�� 's�� J ��` m � i____'_______��-'____ 1��-�� 11 D I 1 O'___ 1 j � 11 11 � ` �- , ❑ I i'`_________ h -----------J i r — u u r--� u i � u i i u ii 11 I I �� ! __� L___J � � u 'I 1 �]�� II ♦ t__JL______ � _______________J _ � I \`��//////////�//////// / /�� L-� � � �� % i fi �% ''��'!�i° � � �„i . � �; I 10. / 59.9 II.t. iw. nm�ioelv. ]a. gp Eftel , P�i V e al NL: �an9e: It �ptn o P�eaaure �wiioElu 50.00 �qi DESImN NN.LLT515 Yevi um St� t�on Flaw: B.2 qpm qeaiJ o�l�flov Rvailable�. 1.99,qpmm Preasure F at Cnfical Stofion. !t ]] pei l�Inqa: O.Ol pai e for M or PJC b ve ElwaCan: Lo e lor Bock 0.00 p i Cr�;w Stalon POC . 5 a Reaeuo Pnesure nra oee 5.1] pai�� ' — �� I— —r1�a� � P w„� / I I � I � I � t i / % I� � �� 'I _ �.� � I �_' / � . ��rr%��i%i:��i. � VALVESCHEDULE tl5lIdBEH M49EL SIZE ➢'PE ri19E PSf P513P9S: S.CM PkECIv ' xC2-1W-Pfte-R �i /n � Cam Bi O%CZ-100-PRB-R 1 Neo ior P-ip ne 5 ]I.52 10.9J 1.55 In/� .. _.� Il4!�ITiLL•] �= �� o Y� ��E� ��9 6 u iaa�cnTioH EouicmErv..o eE wsrnum ir� lAN0.SCAPFlSODOE� AREAS nND WIiHIN PROPERTV LINES. r awwc. vuvES. oR orHEa Eouivm�r sNOww ourvoE OF THE �ANDSCMFJ50 WE�AREq50R PRWERTY LWES IS FOR CURITY PURPOSES OF THE IRRIGAi WN PUN ONLV. S�EEVES UNCER SIOEWnLKSFN� PAVEMENT ARE TO BE P�ACEDAS NECESSARY N1iH EN�S IN 1AN0.5CPPESOp0E0 naEas. S� a.rtsv,.wm.� nw.��wexn � m �`� ��5 y � �, � . ■� `' scua. i= in NORTH �ahcn sEu � J � �$ N �$ C � �E Z � �� t � i � O C � m a �Q `m � � � � u 0 V Y F Capy�ig�t - Dra g and co capte y t ee useE, conatru<teE or p ucee �itnout wrilten p ueion irwn HoEwean Rewurce GrouD� C. �. � .. . . -:..: . ,� , ; � . 1 �/�i tC��"�� 'RI �Al��1�" _' /l�`�`'�''r�.=. ��.v� � ?�� ,� �%`li� � �� .�- � �' � �i A 1 . �yi � S v� ��J�. .,.. �. .-. .,, .: ... � � ��II I— ,.. �',. �� i ... III��INi . 1 ��'I , � .�. ': � �' �DflIPLINE CENTER FEEO L1YOUi `J w. r... m�a -.. Qi wc mn �.wraw nac pv.csu�ouwri pi K' ro�mxnuc rvarw: �. �c� .�rsExr�°`rm.�" "'a'"` �� .W.�,� O� � � ��w." i� � O� i�. �-� "o, m.° � �o,E, :-� �am � �SUB-SUPFACE DRIPLWE AROUND TREE �J.0 � %/� �` i I��.�� ` ' ��oJi ��,� . \��v\v\��\��\��'�\�.�\v\�, I � � �., �� E��FlG.p.s "` I1 �. n�� ,o �E .. ��.�m � � � � L wP � �'°,� �� Q BRA55 ISOLATION VALVE � i '°, . uss r �ca �� y� ��-` � �� n �DPIPLJ�E SUBGRADE INSTALLAiION � ,� �� ..� �°a��Y#%t6T�%��#6k}6Stb�� [�REMOiE CONTROL VALVE W/ PRV Q FILTER �Jo.�.c��-� IRRIGATION GENERAL NOTES na� r�s n� o�vE n ann �a�M�P svsieM.o aEraN AA�car orv sc�awA sH�rorr oEV¢e eavasEO aEn rHe nvw�rnc.uxEns �G�nr a+s?�xnaE so �.wisruAe He wucelwrv svstEw sHO��n ae ossc�o ro �srarvou�s uuosa�c ncnriw,s voq ruar wwo nrvo svrso unoru. nTwNa.wo cHrs sHU�i eE ns1��o vea r.ur�iuNncr�pERS aECOr.v.��n ias �aPo�A.�ow o�°ar�� .s � �a A,m� :�E'��'R�.,EO�.��P��E,�Ro w..w�sPUCea:s� �;�o`a:°r�"'a"o°�� LowoiH.� � �HUOeaw � A�isro .•y�.; •�ti� �� ; � 'Illl� II� II� ��11=�1' II��II-' � - - � II- II II �II . �I=11 II- I � . r•�1 �.,��,�"�� _��"��"��'�,��' !� ��I �� '' �\"��1. �1WIRE BUNDLE JIINCTION BO% wl � ��THRUST BLOCKING � _ � J J n. o - o �� N ?a C `_ Z �n � �u F � N f H �� 0 ��Q�QQ e O C� J a d � �� O � & �opr�gn� — u.a 9 �a co v y o� ee �,Da =o�an�cma o, v a�cea .nno�� ..�u p �aa�o� nam Roea.o� Ra,w�ce cro�v. ��c. i� — —_______ ,i ________ _ 'i I i I ,i �,�E r ,i �� ,i � i � 'i �=�oE.��..�E��= i �snE.�=.,,� � i . I �i o �i '��, o ,I i r�-- � II I a –�- -7m,,,,�'• I y I, I� �I ----� — � ;..-.�, — , ,i ____ —_______ , � i ' I ,i � y \ i .�E � I o �i � �� aES�E,�. �E��, � I I �i , I I � '° ° �� I 0 �'� ''- ! I �r� II ' :__ � . —_— —_— —..f.. __ —..— — . �� I � [__ _ _ i 'I i i T} � + �� III'T'Ill� I a e . 0 I ..—..—. ,.. ..-- �I rca�'uWr[ — _ o-� �,I � o.��.a,��.�Es �, � �, � �n� � „�.o.,u.��g.,e� � I , � � ; , . _. —..— —.. — .—..–..— _.._ —.. � � �� ' I� '� � I� � �== , , � , ., � i .— -- -- ----- - - -- - -- - ----------------------- ----------------------------- � —,.— �._..., � �� aE=��.�E3 � � - — — — — — � o o j �� I \ � � I �- / � - „eb,.� �_ , , e.. , . ---w------ Ig '- t- 'Yrrtn d a � I ^ �"'= oao.E�.;,; Ew�. � m C � � � � o � LL N °' C m � � Z � N ,�^, � U � J V�i � J U O y C� � o� N J � N � � E d IL– U aE _ �p��EDEN72.02 Schematic Building Plans 2012.03.15 A-001 uEA=.E�E�ar,� �:_ ...� m � j 3 D ,� � •�••••�•• Roberson u�o,.a, � a z DeNunzio m Reso�ce �^ D� �p � The DeNunzio Group,llC Gruup,Id.0 __ � — � LafdsCaOeAttl+YetluelDe�SCmuiYp ZD GeawaierBeecn, a�c,m.ayeseexswea mFw -ae 0 R��. o�, cmo��b c��e o o�,n ca,�wsa�. w, uzea� ""'' ,a„.w.,� DeNunzio Residential City of Clearwater, Florida January 2013 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Prepared for: DeNunzio Group L.L.C. 305 Cambridge Street, Suite 3 Cambridge, MA 02141 Ph. (617) 945-2555 Prepared by: ■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■ Landon, Moree � Associates, Inc. Civil 8� Environmental Engineers Planners- Surveyors 31622 U.S. Highway 19 North Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 (727) 789-5010 F. E. B. No. EB-0004096 LMA JOB # 651-02 ELEV, (ft} 3.0 4.0 7.00 �.00 7.00 7.00 DeNunzio Residential Detention Pond Water Quality Volume/Stage Summary AREA ' CUMUL. VOLUME GONTRIBUTING AREA (0.75" OVER BASIN AREA) (acre) Acres) (ao-ft) 0.008 0.000 WATER QUALITY O.U08 0.008 VOLUME (ac-ft) 0.008 0.016 0.008 0.023 WATER QUALITY 0.008 0.031 ELEVATION (ft) 0.008 0.031 0 008 0.031 �.15 0.009 4.20 UndrAn.xls q� w� I I = " I I I I I I M�I I � I I I I I I �aurwm I Iw�mn I� r:.:`:p � Y I ,r um � J ;:,.. . � C � THE FIVE PALMS MOIEL, A CONDOAIINIUAI CONDO P.B. 73, PGS. 69 & 70 m nmr us v�w��Q�xv�¢ '�.�::1, �' �� ..uo.emu � m ♦ —� ��I � 4wn +I�.� r� '� W fe5 �av .r 5�lOYE w INOOIt IIOA w W m� S� �'� m• �. V �M��p '� '� M � �� g�'� � � �'� 5"� PARC6L 1 � � ��'��1 �{ vm �, '�s �� Il� w LOT 8 s ! � ti� : ,� i �. ' w �' > � BLOCK 77 `' /. � '�� n � � / � ��', � g e � , '� s .. "' � �,r ��, v , s � � �� ,� .. � P.o.� a � / ec ��itls�� s'��`.'a.s. � �� sYm �Y � y ! �� . �"' .,�. � s � aD a za w � C �HICm9C'ALE LECEND r pMCy� • - P4OI FO[ O - RQ.Ym Mp11E1fP �- MIW IEiA -a.� -.. - _ 0'QIFM'�ES urE u �v�ut - iasnt uon SECTION 5, TWP. 29 S., RNC. 15 B., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA -��a....cow..W., A�� k n PARCBL 2 � (ir orm I �»sl � c`��P � v�a�[v�[au�\�mn v V �� 0 :� •r w�-m �� .��,�,.�wK WP OA M� oOFtt AS la� x NA1 BOa A. PA2 4 Na �/S fOeOlr ow� rs u. n aaa n. �wo�u. Tc � a. nwwo e�r. ac,wnm� �a w� w�. Mcao�c io �c .rc m rt.�r �wca..s ucwm x ru� wa 34 P.1� 1). ML a IIE PA[ IEL905 a YIQIAS OAMIY. RUM YO � �w� vui�N qr o� P�u�. ��MG USt aF aaa n. YNOMAr wl xu i As I WIX 8 VIR Y R N P.9L Rf W5 6 MWK fPM1Y. RYOA EM: MR YMILI/rtY LLW�HD AS iUltE iiNL A1 N ANpfAS� CO�p ff LOI 4 a901 ]!. � YOWI0.4.�1 UII Iq. k naa wi pssru��..uaxc n� usi �onr a vo wi a �a � m�x¢ a W W fF[110 �E IOIII[A51 [aNif 6 YQ WI 4�OR MM 51B"35'O!L MOW H I00.N 1¢I�. n04 0.x wcYV2. NuC � uE aevM1Il�W 0[4 AfhSml��lpMt � Lp L016 iq 1 p51M4 p! 60.W RI W.1 Yal p H LAtFRY [[pBO� Q P[ SW �OII WlMM111�E U YL 10I��O4 � IAS'OZYI IlY4 LD mm i¢� m� vun � aawc a vu m m�x� u ROOD ZOlE o[ wx ¢so� wv[xrc .wc.ws w a x zac c l� nam otr�ns s n xo i: F¢n. �.�uwa �x �c m wn a nE arv a a�xMnt ww�s cam. mrwn wax ixws pue x� �xwwam-W. wv wm vrt�ax a ma PF@N� FOfl aE mneo an�r. uc BUi�EY A�EMA710N6 !`.': � � � .�. Y': � � � _ _ � _ W = � � � '� �3' Y'.'7: � Y.'e° � � � � �m�a u�r�irmmsN.�o�m.a.YSY�wa�Ra�bu �i� �an�4fe.�om,Wxom�r.aom.am rumeFCUSeawinwvean kioam1`c ..°°n6�.�.�� M�..a.a.�a..w.o..Ha ��N� �Inlfwe�mi �mTliom�� rmor� .M.rifu � mrWrsio[wvvu�u��ura4 nwnamas�uemsm[j.a�lqan�IS��ti.Q � eouoafn.�aTnrocr�nrt�c au�i