Loading...
AMENDMENTS TO BEACH BY DESIGN� } � ��.������ J MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: COMMUNtTY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT November 19, 2013 F.1. ORDINANCE NO.: 8497-14 REQUEST: Amendments to Beach by Design INITIATED BY: City of Clearwater, Planning and Development Department BACKGROUND: At the June 17, 2013 Special Meeting on development issues, City Council directed the Planning and Development Department to conduct one-on-one meetings with City Council members to discuss Beach by Design, and determine if there was consensus on making amendments to the Plan. As a result of those meetings, the Department provided Council with a list of potential amendments at the August 12, 2013 Work Session. After a thorough discussion City Council directed staff to make two amendments which apply to properties located in the Small Motel District located between Hamden and Coronado Drives and along Brightwater Drive. Since that meeting, several hotel development agreement applications requesting units from the Hotel Density Reserve have been submitted and have raised issues that should be addressed in the Hotel Density Reserve criteria. ANALYSIS: Proposed Ordinance No. 8497-14 includes amendments related to side setbacks in the Small Hotel District and front setback/stepback requirements for properties along Hamden Drive as directed by City Council. The ordinance also proposes additional criteria for hotels requesting an allocation from the Hotel Density Reserve. Below is summary of the proposed amendments. Section II. Future Land Use, Subsection F. Small Motel District (page 2 of Ordinance) Due to the compact nature of the Small Motel District, the potential for intensive development and the desire to provide open space between buildings, Ordinance No. 8487-14 establishes a minimum side setback of 10 feet for all development in this character district which will ensure a 20 foot separation between new buildings. This requirement was added to the Small Motel character district so it is clear this is the minimum setback for this District and flexibility cannot be requested through the Tourist (T) District provisions. Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 Amendments to Beach by Design — Page 1 ` ����LU ►T al�l Level III Review PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT � �� x. . Section V. Catalytic Projects (pages 2— 4 of Ordinance) To ensure that hotels utilizing the Hotel Density Reserve are operating in a manner consistent with City Council expectations, the Planning and Development and Legal Departments have developed several new criteria for hotel projects receiving an allocation of rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve. A new requirement is proposed to the Reserve criteria that precludes Reserve units from being used to render a property with nonconforming density conforming. This provision was developed in response to Council's denial of the initial Quality Inn/Hampton Inn projects which involved a request to use units from the Reserve to render an existing hotel on a newly created lot conforming with regard to density. When the Hotel Density Reserve was originally created, the overarching goal was to incentivize the construction of limited service hotels to replace the numerous mom and pop motels that had been demolished to make way for new condominium development. To ensure that any project seeking an allocation from the Hotel Density Reserve operates as a typical hotel and not as a private residence club or other type of vacation home property, proposed Ordinance No. 8497-13 includes a new criteria for the Reserve that limits the occupancy of hotel units from the Reserve to less than one month or 30 consecutive day; specifies that all hotel units be submitted to a rental program requiring all hotel units to be available for members of the public as overnight transient hotel guests at all times; and prohibits hotel units from being used as a primary or permanent residence. A criterion is also proposed that prohibits the inclusion of full kitchens in hotels requesting rooms from the Reserve. Section VII. Design Guidelines (pages 4— 7 of Ordinance) The other amendment included in Ordinance No. 8497-14 expands the application of the setback and stepback requirements for buildings using the Hotel Density Reserve along Coronado Drive to also include properties on Hamden Drive. These provisions require building stepbacks of a certain depth at a certain height based on the front setback provided. The smaller the front setback, the greater the stepback required and at a lower building height. As the building moves closer to the right-of-way line, the scale and mass of the building along the roadway is minimized through these requirements. The goals of these standards are to prevent a canyon effect, reduce building massing along the street and to ensure a human scale street environment. Proposed Ordinance No. 8497-14 also replaces the existing graphics illustrating the setback/stepback concepts with graphics which better represent each setback/stepback option allowed. Architectural Analysis The Planning and Development Department engaged the services of Klar and Klar Architects to study the impacts of the proposed side setback standards for the Small Motel District and the front setback and stepback requirements proposed for Hamden Drive. Klar and Klar Architects analyzed a variety of parcel sizes and configurations to determine the impacts of the proposed requirements on new hotel development. A basic design solution was created for the analysis Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 Amendments to Beach by Design — Page 2 � C�l�L1,A �l aL�� Level III Review PLANNINCi 8 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . .� �.Y^,�595.`:•., �... . .... . that satisfied parking, setback, stepback and height requirements. It should be noted that it was not feasible to explore multiple design solutions or prepare final design drawings so all code issues or design guidelines may not be included in the basic design solution. The study concluded that the proposed new requirements will not negatively impact hotel redevelopment opportunities in the Small Motel District except for development sites that have frontage solely on Hamden Drive. (It is should be noted that the same condition already exists for sites with frontage only on Coronado Drive.) Because these parcels are very shallow (110 feet deep) and as the building increases in height it becomes more narrow, room sizes would be fairly small and it is unlikely balconies could be accommodated. It would be necessary to reduce densities to accommodate more reasonable room sizes and balconies. It should be noted that under the current regulatory environment it would also be difficult to design a hotel at maximum allowable density on parcels only fronting only on Hamden Drive. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPRHENSIVE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE A review of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan identified the following Objectives and Policies which will be furthered by the proposed amendments to Beach by Design: Objective A.5.5 Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity. Policy A.5.5.4 Update Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, the Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan, as needed. Objective A.6.1 The redevelopment of blighted, substandard, inefficient and/or obsolete areas shall be a high priority and promoted through the implementation of redevelopment and special area plans, the construction of catalytic private projects, city investment, and continued emphasis on property maintenance standards. Policy A.6.1.1 Redevelopment shall be encouraged, where appropriate, by providing development incentives such as density bonuses for significant lot consolidation and/or catalytic projects, as well as the use of transfer of developments rights pursuant to approved special area plans and redevelopment plans. Policy A.6.12 Renewal of the beach tourist district shall be encouraged through the establishment of distinct districts within Clearwater Beach, the establishment of a limited density pool of additional hotel rooms to be used in specified geographic areas of Clearwater Beach, enhancement of public rights-of-way, the vacation of public rights-of-way when appropriate, transportation improvements, inter-beach and intra-beach Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 Amendments to Beach by Design — Page 3 � '��ecu ►t t�l�� Level III Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ���... . transit, transfer of development rights and the use of design guidelines, pursuant to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. Objective A.6.6 Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic sector. The proposed amendments implement City Council's desire to provide more open space between developments and less building mass along Hamden Drive. These provisions help further define the envisioned pedestrian friendly character of the Small Motel District and ensure that a certain standard of site and architectural design is met. The additional criteria for the Hotel Density Reserve provides clarification regarding the necessary operational characteristics of hotels using this development incentive to ensure that such projects provide the necessary transient accommodations to support the City's tourism economy. The proposed amendments to Beach by Design will further the purposes of the Community Development Code in that it will be consistent with the following purposes set forth in Community Development Code Section 1-103: • Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through innovative and creative redevelopment (Section 1-103.B1., CDC�. � Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties (Section 1- 103.B.2., CDC). • Protect the character and the social and economic stability of all parts of the city through the establishment of reasonable standards which encourage the orderly and beneficial development of land within the city (Section 1-103.E.2., CDC). • Preserve the natural resources and aesthetic character of the community for both the resident and tourist population consistent with the city's economic underpinnings (Section 1-103.E.5., CDC). • Provide for open spaces through efficient project design and layout that addresses appropriate relationships between buildings on the project site and adjoining properties, including public rights-of-way and other public spaces (Section 1-103.E.6., CDC). • Establish use limitations for specified uses consistent with the zoning district in which they are allowed and the particular characteristics of such specified uses (Section 1- 103.E.10., CDC). . The amendments proposed by this ordinance will further the above referenced purposes by providing clear setback provisions for the Small Motel District that will protect the character of this area of Clearwater Beach and maintain open space between new buildings. The proposed front setback and stepback requirements along Hamden Drive will result in hotel development that is of an appropriate scale to create a pedestrian-oriented environment which is important to both residents and tourists. The additional criteria for the Hotel Density Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 Amendments to Beach by Design — Page 4 � C�e�L�ll.l Level III Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT •�- �, , Reserve require certain operational characteristics to be met to guarantee that such developments are available to the general public at all times. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The proposed amendments to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design are consistent with and will further the goals of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of the Community Development Code. Further, the proposed ordinance establishes minimum setback/stepback standards for property in the Small Motel District and further clarifies expectations regarding the operational characteristics of hotels receiving rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve on Clearwater Beach. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of Ordinance No. 8497-14 that amends Beach by Design. �' ^ Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: � � ina L. Clayton Assistant Planning and Development Director ATTACHMENT: Ordinance No. 8497-14 Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 Amendments to Beach by Design — Page 5 ORDINANCE NO. 8497-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAKING AMENDMENTS TO BEACH BY DESIGN: A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR CLEARWATER BEACH AND DESIGN GUIDELINES; BY AMENDING SECTION II. FUTURE LAND USE, SUBSECTION F. SMALL MOTEL DISTRICT, BY ESTABLISHING MINIMUM SIDE SETBACKS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE DISTRICT; BY AMENDING SECTION V. CATALYTIC PROJECTS, SUBSECTION 6.2 HOTEL DENSITY RESERVE, TO EXPAND THE CRITERIA HOTELS MUST MEET IN ORDER TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR AN ALLOCATION OF HOTEL ROOMS FROM THE RESERVE; BY AMENDING SECTION VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES, SUBSECTION D. SETBACKS AND STEPBACKS, CLARIFYING THAT SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS ARE GOVERNED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR APPLICABLE CHARACTER DISTRICT PROVISIONS AND EXPANDING THE PROVISION FOR CERTAIN SETBACK AND STEPBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR HOTELS USING THE HOTEL DENSITY RESERVE ALONG CORONADO DRIVE TO ALSO APPLY TO HAMDEN DRIVE; CERTIFYING CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PROPER ADVERTISEMENT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Clearwater Beach is a major contributor to the economic health of the City overall and the City desires to support the tourism industry; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater established the hotel density reserve in Beach by Design to incentivize hotel development on Clearwater Beach; and WHEREAS, to achieve the goals envisioned by the Hotel Density Reserve, hotels receiving units from the Reserve shall have certain operational characteristics; WHEREAS, it is desirable to minimize building mass along Hamden Drive and create an environment with a human scale; WHEREAS, appropriate in the properties; and minimum required side setback requirements have been deemed to Small Motel District to ensure that open space is provided between WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to Beach by Design have been submitted to the Community Development Board acting as the Local Planning Authority (LPA) for the City of Clearwater; and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency (LPA) for the City of Clearwater held a duly noticed public hearing and found that amendments to Beach by Design are consistent with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and the Clearwater Community Development Code; and WHEREAS, Beach By Design was originally adopted on February 15, 2001, and subsequently amended, now therefore, Ordinance No. 8497-14 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, Section II. Future Land Use, Subsection F. Small Motel District is amended as follows: F. Small Motel District The area to the east of the Beach District is an area of small motels, many of which have established clientele. The Small Motel District reflects a common paradox of beachfront communities -- improvements which were constructed in a different time before jet travel and air conditioning -- with limited on-site amenities and off-street parking. In many parts of the country, these kinds of units have evolved into residential uses. However, the relative intensity of adjacent land uses and the volumes of north south traffic have maintained the current condition between Hamden and Coronado. Beach by Design contemplates that the existing improvements in the Small Motel District will be sustained over time. Although the existing improvements may not represent the theoretical "highest and best" use of this area, the relatively good condition of most buildings and the economic value of the existing improvements make it difficult, if not impossible, to anticipate significant land assembly, demolition and new development. Brightwater Drive is also developed with small motel uses with building conditions and transient populations similar to those found along Hamden and Coronado. Brightwater's location on the Intracoastal Waterway, in between two other stable residential "fingers", makes it riper for redevelopment. Beach by Design calls for the redevelopment of Brightwater with land uses and building mass which are compatible with the residential cul-de-sacs to the north and south. Mid-rise townhouses and timeshares between 2— 4 stories above parking are contemplated. Additionally, consideration should be given to the development of a shared parking facility along the street to provide some of the required parking that will be associated with redevelopment. Due to the compact nature of this district. its location in the heart of the tourist area and the potential for intensive redevelopment, minimum side setbacks of 10 feet for all development are herebv established to ensure that adeauate open sqace is provided between properties. Section 2. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, Section V. Catalytic Projects, B. Community Redevelopment District, Subsection 2. Hotel Density Reserve, is amended as follows: 2. Hotel Density Reserve (208�13 Update) ********** The allocation of hotel rooms from the Reserve shall be made through the approval of a development agreement with the City of Clearwater with said allocation being strictly controlled. In order to be eligible to draw units from the Hotel Density Reserve, a development would have to incorporate, meet, and/or abide by each of the following: 2 Ordinance No. 8497-14 ❖ Those properties and/or developments that have acquired density from the Destination Resort Density Pool are not eligible to have rooms allocated from the Reserve; ❖ Those properties and/or developments that have had density transferred off to another property and/or development(s) through an approved Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) application by the City after December 31, 2007, are not eligible to have rooms allocated from the Reserve; ❖ The Hotel Densitv Reserve shall not be used to render nonconformina density conforminq� ❖ A maximum of 100 hotel rooms may be allocated from the Reserve to any development with a lot size less than 2.5 acres. Those developments with a lot size greater than or equal to 2.5 acres may use the Reserve to achieve a density of 90 hotel rooms per acre. However, in no instance shall the density of a parcel of land exceed 150 units per acre regardless of whether it has received benefit of transfers of development rights or units through a t_ermination of status of nonconformitv in addition to the Reserve, or not; ❖ Accessory uses inconsistent with amenities typical of a mid-priced hotel shall require compliance with the base FAR requirements of the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use category; ❖ No hotel room allocated from the Reserve may be converted to a residential use (i.e. attached dwelling); ❖ Occupancv in units from the Reserve is limited to a term of less than one (1) month or thirty (30) consecutive davs, whichever is less. No hotel unit in a hotel receivina units from the Reserve shall be used as a primary or permanent residence and each hotel unit shall be available to transient hotel guests. All hotel units shall be repuired to be submitted to a rental proqram requiring all hotel units to be available for members of the public as overniQht transient hotel quests at all times: ❖ No hotel room in a hotel allocated units from the Reserve mav have a full kitchen Mini kitchens defined as includin reduced sized kitchen a liances ma be ermitted� ❖ The maximum building heights of the various character districts cannot be increased to accommodate hotel rooms allocated from the Reserve; ❖ When both the allocation of hotel rooms from the Reserve and the transfer of development rights (TDR) are utilized as part of a development, only hotel rooms brought in to the project through the TDR process are eligible to be constructed above the otherwise maximum building height, but only provided that all TDR criteria are met; ❖ A legally enforceable mandatory evacuation/closure covenant that the overnight accommodation use will be closed as soon as practicable after a hurricane watch that includes Clearwater Beach is posted by the National Hurricane Center; ❖ Access to overnight accommodation units must be provided through a lobby and internal corridors; ❖ All hotel rooms obtained from the Reserve that are not constructed shall be returned to the Reserve; Ordinance No. 8497-14 ❖ The development shall comply with the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) countywide approach to the application of concurrency management for transportation facilities, and the transportation analysis conducted for the development shall include the following: ■ Recognition of standard data sources as established by the MPO; ■ Identification of level of service (LOS) standards for state and county roads as established by the MPO; ■ Utilization of proportional fair-share requirements consistent with Florida Statues and the MPO model ordinance; ■ Utilization of the MPO Traffic Impact Study Methodology; and ■ Recognition of the MPO designation of "Constrained Facilities" as set forth in the most current MPO Annual Level of Service Report; ❖ A reservation system shall be required as an integral part of the hotel use and there shall be a lobby/front desk area that must be operated as a typical lobby/front desk area for a hotel would be operated; and ❖ The books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room shall be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with these regulations as allowed by general law. Section 3. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, Section VII. Design Guidelines, Subsection D. Setbacks and Stepbacks, are amended as follows: ********** 2. Side and Rear Setbacks , , '' . Side and rear setbacks shall be qoverned bv the provisions of the Tourist District of the Community Development Code unless otherwise qrescribed in the applicable Character District provisions contained in Section II.. Future Land Use. 3. Coronado and Hamden Drives Setbacks and Stepbacks. To reduce upper story massing along the street and ensure a human scale street environment, buildings using the hotel density reserve along Coronado and Hamden Drives shall be constructed in accordance with the following: a. Buildings constructed with a front setback of fifteen feet (15') or more shall stepback with a minimum depth of fifteen feet (15') from the setback line at a height not more than twenty-five feet (25'). Insert new raphic: 4 Ordinance No. 8497-14 DIAGRAM 'A` b. Buildings constructed with a front setback greater than or equal to ten feet (10') and less than fifteen feet (15') shall stepback at a height not more than twenty feet (20'). The required stepback/ setback ratio is one and one-half feet (1.5') for every one foot (1') reduction in setback in addition to the minimum stepback of fifteen feet (15'). Insert new araphic: �♦ ;� ;J �� ;� �b �� 22'-b" �_ ,�- f0'-O" DIAGRAM '6' EXpMPIE � �.. _ - , _�.i�.=. c. Buildings constructed with a front setback of less than ten feet (10') shall provide a building stepback at a height not more than fifteen feet (15'). The required stepback/ setback ratio is two and one-half feet (2.5') for every one foot (1') reduction in setback in addition to the minimum stepback of fifteen feet (15'). Insert new praphic: Ordinance No. 8497-14 �♦ � Jy �F �� �� :� �� 40'-O" i_,i:.` 5'-�" DIAGRAM 'C' EXAMPLE � .•.- .._.,. ..: •,- �,a .- d. To achieve upper story facade variety and articulation, additional stepbacks may be required. To avoid a monotonous streetscape, a building shall not replicate the stepback configuration of the adjacent buildings including those across rights-of-way. Insert new graphic: DIAGRAM 'D' EXAMPLE Ordinance No. 8497-14 e. Required stepbacks shall span a minimum of 75% of the building frontage width. Delete the following two graphics 1 �EQ�EB �:t�A4� *********** Section 3. The City Manager or designee shall forward said plan to any agency required by law or rule to review or approve same. Section 4. The City of Clearwater does hereby certify that the amendments contained herein, as well as the provisions of this Ordinance, are consistent with and in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Section 5. Notice of the proposed enactment of this Ordinance has been properly advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with applicable law. Section 6. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 7. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED George N. Cretekos Mayor 7 Ordinance No. 8497-14 Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Rosemarie Call Assistant City Attorney City Clerk Ordinance No. 8497-14 Gina L. Clayton 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 727-562-4587 �ina.claytonna,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Assistant Planning and Development Director City of Clearwater September 2009 to present Responsible for assisting the Planning and Development Director in directing the day-to-day planning, zoning, building and code compliance operations including the supervision of the Long Range Planning, Development Review and Code Compliance Managers, as well as the Building Official. Serve as staff to the Community Development Board, Municipal Code Enforcement Board and City Council. • Assistant Planning Director City of Clearwater Apri12005 to September 2009 Responsible for assisting the Planning Director in directing the day-to-day planning and zoning operations including the supervision of the Long Range Planning Manager and Development Review Manager. Served as staff to the Community Development Board and City Council. Long Range Planning Manager City of Clearwater 2001 to 2005 Responsible for numerous aspects of the Growth Management Act of Florida including comprehensive planning, future land use plan amendments, rezonings, and annexations. Supervised long range planning staff. Served as staff to the Community Development Board and presented long range cases/issues to the City Council. Responsible for the preparation of special area plans and the site plan review process within the Downtown Plan area. Served as the city's representative on countywide and regional planning agency committees. • Senior Planner City of Clearwater 1999 to 2001 Responsible for various long rang planning projects/studies including the preparation of major amendments to the Community Development Code, updates of special area plans, and the development of neighborhood plans and test amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Served as staff to the Community Development Board, presented projects to the City Council and served as the city's representative on the Pinellas Planning Council's Planners Advisory Committee. �� Community Development Director City of Indian Rocks Beach 1997 to 1999 Responsible for the administration of the city's planning, building and code enforcement functions. Served as staff to the City Commission, Planning and Zoning Board and Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Administered the land development regulations, processed future land use plan amendments and rezonings. Prepared numerous amendments to the land development code and conducted special planning studies. Responsible for the administration of the Community Rating Systern and the flood regulations. Served as the city's representative on countywide and regional planning agency committees. • Planner City of Solon, OH 1993 to 1996 Responsible for drafting significant portions of a new zoning code. Drafted a new sign ordinance and new driveway regulations. Prepared proposal for CDBG funding for downtown streetscape project and prepared requests for proposals for master land use plan and master recreation plan. • City Planner City of Avon Lake, OH 1991 to 1993 Responsible for the administration of the planning functions of the City. Served as staff to the City Council and as Secretary to the Planning Commission. Administered subdivision regulations and zoning code. Updated planning documents including the Future Land Use Plan and the Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan. Revised sections of the Avon Lake Subdivision Regulations and zoning code. • Zoning Administrator City of Cleveland Heights, OH 1988 to 1991 Responsible for administering the zoning code which included the preparation of all research, agendas, legal notices, action sheets and resolutions related to variance and special exception requests. Presented zoning cases to the Board of Zoning Appeals, Planning Commission, Board of Control and City Council. Supervised zoning secretary and intern. • General Development Planner City of Cleveland Heights, OH 1987 to 1988 Responsible for preparing the City's first Strategic Development Plan. Compiled and analyzed demographic, housing, economic and land use data. Developed techniques far citizen participation and effective input from the Planning Commission in the strategic planning process. Conducted research on various issues including poverty, historic preservation and residential and commercial code enforcement methods. EDUCATION Master's Degree in Urban and Regional Planning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1986 Bachelor of Arts in History with a minor in Community Planning, Appalachian State University, 1984 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS & ACTIVITIES Pinellas County Historic Preservation Board - 2013 - Present Pinellas County Historic Preservation Advisory Board - 2009 — 2013 Chair, Toolbox Committee, 2010 — 2013 Urban Land Institute, 2013 - Present American Planning Association, 1987 — Present Florida Planning Association, 1997 — Present Ohio Planning Conference (OPC), a Chapter of the American Planning Association, 1987-1996 Co-Director, Cleveland Section of OPC, 1994-1996 Chair of Annual Zoning Workshop, Cleveland Section of OPC, 1994 and 1995. Coordinator and Moderator, "The Basics of Zoning and the Tools for Managing Change," 1995 Speaker, "Job of the Zoning Administrator," 1994