FLD2013-09032� l�ar����r
_�
�
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
CASE:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
November 19, 2013
E.4.
FLD2013-09032
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to allow a Medical Clinic in a 5,350 square foot
building in the Commercial District with a lot area of 0.30 acres; a lot width of 10130
feet (along Gulf to Bay Boulevard); a front setback (south) of 16 feet (to building); side
(east) setbacks of two feet (to canopy), three feet (to pavement), and 24 feet (to
building); side (west) setbacks of two feet (to structure) and five feet (to building); rear
setbacks of zero feet (to canopy) and 23 feet (to building); and a building height of 30
feet (to mid-point of pitched roo fl, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
pursuant to Section 2-704.E ; and a non-residential off-street parking lot in the Low
Medium Density Residential District with a lot area of 0.44 acres (19,484 square feet);
a lot width of 70.2 feet (along South Lake Drive) and 71 feet (along Yelvington
Avenue); a front (west) setback of 15.3 feet (to pavement); a front (east) setback of 70
feet (to pavement); a side (north) setback of five feet (to pavement) and a side (south)
setback of zero feet (to canopy structure); and 28 non-residential off-street parking
spaces as a Residential Infill Project pursuant to Section 2-204.E. as well as a reduction
to the width of the east perimeter landscape buffer from five feet to two feet; a
reduction to the width of the west perimeter landscape buffer from five feet to two feet;
a reduction to the width of the north perimeter landscape buffer from ten feet to five
feet; and a reduction of the rear (north) perimeter landscape buffer from five feet wide
to zero feet; and the use of 33 accent and palm trees in-lieu of 20 shade trees as a
Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3-1402.G.
GENERAL DATA:
Agent...........................
Applicanb Owner . . .. . ........
L oca tion . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property Size ....................
Future Land Use Plan......
Zoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Adjacent Zoning.... North:
South:
East:
West:
Existing Land Use .............
Proposed Land Use.........
k�:' �
Eric Egozi
Sam C. Liu & Judy Y. Liu
1608 Gulf to Bay Boulevard; north side of Gulf to Bay Boulevard, approximately 69
feet west of the South Lake Drive
0.74 acres (C District: 0.30 acres) (LMDR District: 0.44 acres)
Commercial General (CG); Residential Urban (RU)
Commercial (C) District; Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
Commercial (C) District
Commercial (C) District and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) and Commercial (C) District
Vacant land
Medical Clinic
? s,¢
,
}',� �� :
��J!; 1��� ��`�'� � ��. �"��'�"
�� � - �
� �
� � ���
� r... �
`• i
` y,, ,
if
T
r
t�� � -
�� �y� �.
,� � , � � �
!Ir',.,.
� �
� 'a ,>:�,
�
o � '�' � ,°' t�
�t i��� �< ~•� ��,�u!
, �
y � i�:
�
� ��
�
�;
�
„
..:
�i
,r M
�;
e
0
���1.4�,i �1' �tL4� Level II Flexible Development Application Review
�...,�..--..i-._i-� �... . . ..
-�. .^, i-.... ; . ..
.. . - ��._ ��_ �. . . .
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.747 acre subject property is located on the
north side of Gulf to Bay Boulevard
approximately 69 feet west of the South Lake
Drive and Gulf to Bay Boulevard intersection.
The subject property is comprised of two
properties that must be joined together through a
Unity of Title prior to the issuance of any
permits. The property has approximately 101.3
feet of frontage along Gulf to Bay Boulevard,
70.2 feet along South Lake Drive, and 71 feet
along Yelvington Avenue. This site has three
access points, one on each frontage.
The 0.3-acre southern parcel is zoned
Commercial (C) District and has direct access to
Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The land is vacant, but
according to City records, a restaurant use
previously operated on the parcel.
The 0.44-acre northern parcel is zoned Low
Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
and has two frontages with direct access to
Yelvington Avenue and South Lake Drive. It
has been used in the past for non-residential
parking when the commercial property consisted
of a restaurant use. At this time, according to
the applicant's representative, the existing
parking area is not being used by any
surrounding businesses.
The immediate vicinity is characterized by a
variety of non-residential uses including Pinellas
Federal Credit Union and USAmeriBank across
Gulf to Bay Boulevard to the south, a retail strip
plaza to the east, and a locksmith and tattoo
parlor to the west. A variety of other fast food
restaurants, offices, and other retail sales and
service establishments are located farther to the
east and west along Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The
neighborhood to the north is within a LMDR
district and consists of detached and attached
dwellings. Located directly across South Lake
Drive is Crest Lake Park.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REViEW DIVISION
— � _ _..: .,.��'� — �� �a�
r _LAURABT — � Ir � S
�1 � � � _' ,_ _
= i_ � _
CLEVEtAND ST
J — �_ _II —'� �I ��(��
�K ST �
, �
HARVARDST �� W I � I
J2CEST �� � � — � Z .
i
fRANKLINST �,-�-1 �P+�`I DqRTMOUTHST � �� Q.�
... .CASt1�X r .._ I ,F �.
� � E- 1 . I __ l _S�I —��I I
' RAINBOW OR: �.�� -
Q ' .... ( .� � PROJ�ECT � i I� I �� I I
-__ � I
�., ....,..¢ Q .:.,. " �
�uRr sr � - � _ ; _ Q � -cU�k-raenv e w � - l L I
— I �� aSr �I l� - — , , _ I��`5 IWI
N �
I I 3 (�L g��. � I I I I � li >
_ I I J TURNERST N o _TUaNER' T' �� —�XL
1 r <_ ,
4NE3`T I .._I I I Jr la, � I�'�,_
i I I M4RION ST I I
_ J _�� I� ��, �� -
J��I-orzlioko � ._ .. - .
�:r �_' "� 1�1J !1: i-
LOCATION MAP
RA/NBOWOR � � �
� '� _ so�.._. _-- s�
LMDR I O
, ; ,., � .,: �
, m, '� .� ; �
; � a�
� .v - - �
OS/R ' �
iwf�t����F��tL1� I M �I�
� I • � _ _ I � I ''
�a.�.6�€+�€F_; ��es:s€aaEg��
-�ssa�1 _. _ _. � _, ��.
outs-ro-eare�w
C
�'� 4 A � �� � € € e �658§�`6°6 � i "a �
a I � n. I�
� _ _ �
,,, ..o w ,,, I � - - ' > � i
,
,,,; ,. �
,,, ;
LMDR `�� "'
MDR "' i I �" "' '
� _ .., _ _ - -- .!
ZONING MAP
LAKE
PARK
/ e RA/NBOW OR
�
m Q
O
� AT�1C � �& a
� A� H�`° �
Z
o� �
R 7A ;SA E�' SI
ee� �s �i - 5� �
GU[F�O.BAYBLVD
� �
.�„
OFI E .� �
�
_ �
q
-,- - ,--,--
t1/I� 3 � „ �_
�z�@=i�:A�i:
p 9 �� 4 � � .��a� 5 6
�'� �RE T RANT$ 8� OFFT E '
w �
�
Q1 6f0 Q � Z � � G p
y p y� " —_ —_ f bf
�
� -a -,s s „ � � }., �
, .z
� N ns — —
B XI M� sts 2] 6t�
-- — - `° __ L-- - -
... .... a1.._ ... . ._...
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
Community Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 1 of 14
Y C�e(A1 1'�((�le� Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
U,. ��r�.� .,��. �, ;, �
Development Proposal:
The proposal is to construct a medical clinic on the northern portion of the property zoned C
District and construct the associated off-street parking on the southern portion of the property
zoned LMDR District. The properties will be joined together into a single development parcel
through a Unity of Title.
The northern lot will be redeveloped with 28 parking spaces, a dumpster enclosure, stormwater
pond, and a four-foot high masonry wall along the north property line to screen the parking lot
from adjacent properties.
A 5,350 square foot, single-story medical clinic is proposed to be constructed on the southern lot.
According to the applicant, the architectural style of the building will be Mediterranean Spanish,
and this style will be reflected on all building facades to form a cohesive and visually interesting
design.
The buildings primary entrance will face north so that the rear of the building will front on Gulf
to Bay Boulevard. The rear of the building will be setback 16 feet from the front property line to
be consistent with the adjacent properties building line. The south (rear) fa�ade will include
architectural details such as fa� archways with lattice work for planting material to grow within
each archway, arched windows, ceramic tiles, roof and window eave supports. The east, north,
and west facades of the building will be consistent with the south fa�ade with regard to
architectural style, materials, finish, color, and detail. The building design includes an extended
cupola with faux arched windows with a mix of blue ceramic tiles to substitute for glass. The
design also includes various roof forms that are both flat and hipped with Spanish tiles, to allow
the building to have a unique design. The proposed colors are light yellows and are being used to
accentuate the building by giving the appearance of a base, middle, and top. The building colors
are not garish, gaudy, loud, excessive, or ostentatious.
The south lot will have direct access to Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The owner proposes to retain and
improve the existing driveway to allow through access to the north side of the property; however,
it is expected that the South Lake Drive driveway will serve as the primary entrance. The
owner's representative stated that the Gulf to Bay driveway is necessary in case of an
emergency. An emergency access door will be located on the east side of the building. A canopy
with a minimum height of 14 feet is proposed over the doorway and driveway. Patients who
may need emergency care and transfer to local hospitals will be transported through this door, if
necessary. This doorway is not a primary entrance to the building. The primary entrance will be
located on the north side of the building where a canopy with a minimum height of 14 feet will
also be provided over a drop-off zone. Both driveways will allow for two-way traffic.
While landscaping is proposed along all property lines of the site a few of the buffer widths
however, do not meet the provisions of CDC Article 3, Division 12. These include a two-foot
wide perimeter landscape buffer along the east property line where five feet is required, a two-
foot wide perimeter landscape buffer along the west side where a five foot wide perimeter
landscape buffer is required, a rear perimeter landscape buffer of zero feet where five foot
perimeter landscape buffer is required, and a five foot wide landscape buffer along the northern
lots north property line where a ten foot wide perimeter landscape buffer required.
Community Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 2 of 14
� C1L�� 11(�l�i Level II Flexible Develo ment lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
P APP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION
y . . ...��.'�,.'.( . :. .
The applicant has mitigated the dimensional deficiency with regard to buffer widths through the
provision of landscape material in excess of the minimum otherwise required by the CDC, and
by providing added greenspace on site whereby reducing the overall impervious surface. The
landscape plan includes a variety of accent and palm trees (fox tail palms, crape myrtles,
ligustrum, and red cedar), as well as shrubs and ground covers (queen emma, Indian hawthorn,
red ti plant, wintergreen boxwood, flax lily, and giant liriope). The buffers will be planted in
such a manner as to create a tiered effect providing adequate buffers between the subject
property and adjacent rights-of-way and properties.
The proposal is being reviewed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as the proposal
does not meet the applicable development standards (front, side and rear setbacks as well as
height) for a medical clinic use through the Level One Flexible Standard Development (FLS)
application tier.
The non-residential off-street parking to be provided on the northern portion of the property is a
permitted use in the LMDR District; however, the requested reductions to the front (along South
Lake Drive) and side (north and south) setbacks are less than required so the request must be
reviewed as a Residential Infill Project.
Special Area Plan:
None
Development Parameters
Floor Area Ratio (FAR�:
Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-701.1, the maximum FAR for
properties with a Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) designation of Commercial General (CG) is
0.55. The proposed FAR is 0.41, which is consistent with Code provisions. Only parking is
proposed on that portion of the property with a FLUP of Residential Urban (RU); therefore there
is no associated FAR.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR�
Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-701.1, the maximum allowable ISR
is 0.90 for properties with a FLUP designation of CG. The proposed ISR is 0.77, which is
consistent with Code provisions. In addition, pursuant to CDC Section 2-201.1, the maximum
allowable ISR for properties with a FLUP designation of RU is 0.65. The proposed ISR is 0.54,
which is consistent with Code provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width:
Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no minimum required lot area or lot width for a
Comprehensive Iniill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to
CDC Table 2-703, medical clinics in the C District require a lot area of 10,000 square feet and
lot width of 100 feet. The lot area is 13,074 square feet and the lot width is 101.3 feet exceeding
the minimum axea and width otherwise required by Code.
Community Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 3 of 14
9 1i�l.fla fl'�ll.l Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION
� , ��_
Pursuant to CDC Table 2-204, there is no minimum required lot area or lot width for a
Residential Infill Project. Pursuant to the same table, there is no minimum required lot area or
lot width for non-residential parking lots.
Minimum Setbacks:
Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there are no minimum required setbacks for a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to CDC Table 2-
703, front, side, and rear setbacks for a medical clinic are 25 feet, 10 feet and 20 feet,
respectively.
The front setback to the building on the southern portion of the property will be 16 feet. This
setback is asked to allow the building to maintain the existing building line with adjacent
properties and allows for the required 15 foot wide landscape perimeter buffer along Gulf to Bay
Boulevard. The applicant has mitigated the front setback dimension to include the front
perimeter landscape buffer since Gulf to Bay Boulevard is a scenic corridor. The front landscape
buffer will be planted with clusters of palm trees with various shrubs and ground covers (fox tail
palms, red ti plant, indian hawthorne, mandevilla, and queen emma) in a tiered effect to
complement the Mediterranean Spanish architectural design of the building.
The southern portion of the property also includes a side (east) setback of two-feet to canopy, a
side (west) setback of two-foot to concrete pad, and a rear (north) setback of zero feet to
pavement. The side (east) setback is two feet to canopy where the canopy is 20 feet wide. The
length of the east property line is 130 linear feet. A side setback of five feet is provided for 75
feet of the 130 feet length of the side yard. The remaining 35 feet of the side (east) setback
narrows from four feet wide to three feet wide at the driveway apron. The west property line is
approximately the same length as the east property line. The side (west) setback is similar to the
east perimeter landscape buffer where 110 linear feet will have a five foot setback; the setback
will be reduced to two feet wide for 20 linear feet due to a concrete pad within the buffer. The
concrete pad is for outdoor mechanical equipment. The mechanical equipment will not be
enclosed within a building but such equipment is exempt from side and rear setback
requirements and shall be screened on all sides from street view and adjacent properties with
planting material. The rear setback is zero feet to pavement because of the shared access between
the parcels. These setbacks are necessary to allow for a code compliant driveway with through
access to the parking area that may need to be utilized for emergency vehicles. These setbacks
result in locating the building within the southwest area of the lot. This area will be greenspace
that includes the stormwater pond and twelve accent trees around the perimeter of the pond to
screen the parking lot from Yelvington Avenue.
With regard to the parking lot on the northern portion of the property, the proposed front (west)
setback of 15.3 feet exceeds the range of 10 — 15 feet for a Residential Infill Project. The front
(east) setback will be 76 feet to pavement which also exceeds code. However, the proposal
includes side (north) setback of five feet where ten feet is required and a side (south) setback of
zero feet to pavement where five feet is required. The side (south) setback is only zero feet for
100 linear feet, the remaining 170 feet will have a five foot setback to pavement. The reduced
setbacks allow for a code compliant drive aisle and parking spaces whereby allowing for a total
Community Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 4 of 14
� C�v(�l 1't[tL�l Level II Flexibie Develo ment lication Review PLa,xrrn�rG&DEV�corMErrr
P MP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
U .. . ^$� �°�e"". .
of 28 parking spaces where 26 parking spaces are required for medical clinic with 5,350 square
feet of gross floor area.
Wall or Fence:
With regard to the non-residential off-street parking lot in the LMDR District, code requires that
a wall or fence at least three feet in height which is landscaped on the external side with a
continuous hedge or non-deciduous vine be provided to screen the parking from adjacent
property and right-of-way. A four-foot high masonry wall will be built along the north property
line; however, due to an existing six-foot high wood fence along the north property line that is
owned by adjacent property owners, the required landscaping will be planted along the internal
side of the wall rather than along the exterior side of the wall. No wall can be built along the
front (west) property line as it would be located within the sight visibility triangle. The east side
of the parking lot is 71 feet from the east property line and it will be effectively screened by use
of landscape materials which include accent trees, shrubs and groundcovers, no wall shall be
required along east side of the property. However, a wall or fence can be built along the south
property line to aid in screening the parking lot from the adjacent properties. It shall be a
condition of approval that the owner provide a wall or fence at least three feet in height along the
south property line.
Mcxximum Buildin� Hei�
Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no maximum height for a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to CDC Table 2-703, the
maximum allowable height for medical clinic use is 25 feet. The proposed building height will
be between 21 feet (to flat roo� and 30 feet (to mid-point of pitched roo�, the latter of which
exceeds the maacimum allowable height.
The height for the majority of the building is 21 feet (to flat roo�. The additional five feet in
height over the allowable height is to allow for the cupolas as an architectural feature. The
cupolas add architectural elements that include arched windows with a mix of blue ceramic tiles
and varying roof heights which give the building a unique character. Staff supports the building
height of 30 feet to mid-point of pitched roof.
Minimum Of,f-StreetParkin�
Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704, there is no minimum off-street parking requirement for a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to
CDC Table 2-703, the minimum required parking for medical clinic is five parking spaces per
1,000 square feet of gross floor area. This results in a requirement of 26 parking spaces for a
5,350 square foot medical clinic. The proposal provides 28 parking spaces or 5.3 spaces per
1,000 square feet of gross floor area which is consistent with Code provision.
Mechanical Ec�ui,pment:
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened on all
four sides so not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. Based on the site
plan, mechanical equipment will be located to the northwest side of the building. The landscape
plan shows the equipment will be screened on all four sides using landscape plantings from
Community Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 5 of 14
r C�\.itil ►7�L�1 Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
P Pp DEVELOPMENT REVIPW DMSION
� � ��_�_�
streets and abutting properties; however, the screening of inechanical equipment will be
addressed at time of permitting.
SiQht VisibilitX Triangles:
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the proposed driveways on Gulf to
Bay Boulevard and South Lake Drive, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will
obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-
foot sight visibility triangles. This proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering
Department and been found to be acceptable. Any shrubbery or groundcovers planted within the
sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements.
Utilities:
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities
including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding
is not practicable. The layout and control erosion plan shows existing overhead lines along
South Lake Drive, Yelvington Avenue, and across the subject property. All utilities which serve
the site shall be underground or the applicant shall provide documentation from the utility
companies if undergrounding the existing overhead utility lines within the public right-of-way
along South Lake Drive and Yelvington Avenue as well as the overhead line across the site is
impractical. If is determined that the overhead wires can be placed underground, then provisions
for the future undergrounding of existing aboveground utility facilities in the public right-of-way
and on-site must be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy in a manner
acceptable to the utility companies and the City.
Landscaping_
Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, required perimeter buffers are based on adjacent uses and/or
street types. The required landscape liuffers are 15 feet (south — arterial street), 10 feet (west —
local street), 10 feet (east — local street), 10 feet (north — residential), five feet (south — non-
residential), five feet (east — non-residential), and five feet east — nonresidential). The proposal
includes the maximum practicable landscaping buffers and includes, at a minimum, a 15 foot
landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Boulevard west of the ingress/ egress opening and 15 feet
along South Lake Drive and more than 15 feet along Yelvington Avenue where the setback is 70
feet to pavement. Along the west, south and east property lines a five foot wide buffer is
required. Except for portions of the buffers that include pavement, canopy, and concrete pads,
each buffer width will be five feet wide. The side (north) buffer is required o be 10 feet wide but
will only be five foot wide to allow for code compliant parking spaces and drive aisles. The
buffers will have accent trees and palms as the landscape plan show the use of thirty-three accent
and palm in lieu of the required twenty shade trees. The buffers will also have a continuous
hedge, shrubs, and ground cover. The front (south) and front (west) buffers will be planted in
such a manner as to create a tiered effect providing adequate buffers between the subject
property and adjacent right-of-way.
The site is proposing the maximum practical landscaping improvements and is focusing
landscaping improvements in those areas that are most visible; the front (south) and front (west)
buffers. The proposed landscaping will be a significant improvement, is the maximum
practicable, and is supportable.
Community Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 6 of 14
r Cl�.t1l 17µLLl Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
P Pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
� ;:� .
Solid Waste:
A dumpster is proposed at the northeast corner of the site. The dumpster area will be screened
by a solid concrete masonry wall with finish to match the primary exterior color of the medical
clinic building. The proposed dumpster will be reviewed at time of permitting for compliance
with the requirements of the City's Solid Waste and Fire Departments.
Signage:
The submitted building elevations show an attached sign on the south fa�ade of the building.
However a formal signage package has not been presented at this time. Any forthcoming
signage package must meet Code requirements.
Comprehensive Plan: The proposal is supported by various Goals, Objectives and/or Policies of
the City's Comprehensive Plan as follows:
Future Land Use Plan Element
Policy A.3.2 Objective — All development or redevelopment initiatives within the City of
Clearwater shall meet the minimum landscaping / tree protection standards of the Community
Development Code in order to promote the preservation of existing tree canopies, the expansion
of that canopy, and the overall qualiry of development within the City.
The proposal includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program due to the reduction of buffers, and
foundation landscaping. However the proposal includes three compliant buffer widths two of
which are front buffers along Gulf to Bay and South Lake Drive that includes additional accent
trees, palms, hedges, shrubs, and ground cover and meets the spirit of this objective to the
m�imum extent practicable.
Objective A.6.4 — Due to the built-out character of the ciry of Clearwater, compact urban
development within the urban service area shall be promoted through application of the
Clearwater Community Development Code.
The proposal addresses this Objective through the use of the Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project and Residential Infill Project as part of a Flexible Development
application to redevelop a site that has been vacant, without the requested deviations from Code
would have its potential use severely limited.
Community Develo�ment Code: The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and
basic planning objectives of this Code as follows:
Section 1-103.B.1. Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through
innovative and creative redevelopment.
The property owners will make improvements to the site through the demolition of the existing
structures on site and construction of a new building with enhanced architectural treatments. The
landscaping proposed with a tiered effect providing enhanced buffers between the subject
property and adjacent right-of-way and subject properties.
Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative
impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development
and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties.
Community Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 7 of 14
p Cl�.�al 1'!'t�l�l Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
� ;� �,�, �: d: ���
Surrounding properties to the north, east and west have been developed with residential and a
variety of non-residential uses including retail sales and services, offices. The adjacent
commercial properties have been similarly developed with regard to setbacks (to pavement and
buildings). The proposed landscaping of the subject property will be an upgrade compared to the
landscaping of the surrounding properties. Also, due to the location of the stormwater pond no
run-off water will affect the residential properties to the north.
Section 1-103. B. 3. Strengthening the city's economy and increasing its tax base as a whole.
The property is vacant. The proposal will establish an allowable use for the site, while bringing
a new service to the area and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Section 1-103.E.3. Protect and conserve the value of land throughout the city and the value of
buildings and improvements upon the land, and minimize the conflicts among the uses of land
and buildings
The proposed use is not anticipated to have any conflict with the surrounding uses of land. The
site was previously used for a restaurant and its associated parking and has been vacant
according to City records since 2008. The proposal will establish a allowable use within a new
building and improved site.
General �urpose and Intent of the Commercial Zoning District (Section 2-701 � The intent and
purpose of the Commercial District is to provide the citizens of the City of Clearwater with
convenient access to goods and services throughout the city without adversely impacting the
integrity of residential neighborhoods, diminishing the scenic quality of the ciry or negatively
impacting the safe and efficient movement of people and things within the City of Clearwater.
The proposal will provide a new use conveniently located with access to the site from Gulf to
Bay Boulevaxd and South Lake Drive. The adjacent uses are commercial and the use will not
negatively affect residential properties to the north. The proposal includes establishing a medical
clinic use within a new building and improved site with landscaping to the maximum extent
practicable.
Code Enforcement Analysis:
There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property.
Community Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 8 of 14
� C1VN� rt�l��� Level II Flexible Develo ment Application Review PLnxrr�G & nEVeLOrMExr
P DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
i� '�*°�,�.� ... �t ^ -. .
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards for
restaurant as per CDC Tables 2-201.1, 2-204, 2-701.1 and 2-704:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Floor Area Ratio LMDR: N/A N/A X
C: 0.55 0.41 X
Impervious Surface Ratio LMDR: 0.65 0.54 X
C: 0.9 0.77 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 0.74 acres (C: 0.30, LMDR: 0.44) X
Minimum Lot Width N/A 101.3 feet (Gulf to Bay Boulevard) X
70.2 feet (South Lake Drive)
71 feet (Yelvington Avenue)
Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A South: 16 feet to building X
(C) Side: N/A East: 2 feet to canopy X
West: 2 feet to concrete pad X
Rear: N/A North: Zero feet to pavement X
Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A West: 15 feet to pavement X
(LMDR) East: 70 feet to pavement X
Side: N/A North: 5 feet to pavement X
South: 5 feet to pavement X
Maximum Height N/A 30 feet X
Minimum N/A 5.3 spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. GFA X
Off-Street Parkin 28 s aces
Community Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 9 of 14
� C1�L�1 �ttLl��l Level II Flexible Deve�o mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIViSION
� �.����������� �
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility
criteria as per CDC Section 2-704.C. (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project):
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
Consistent I Inconsistent
X
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the locai economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of
an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;
or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of
a working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking aze justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted
in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following
design elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters, por[icos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building stepbacks; and
❑ Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced
landsca e desi n and a ro riate distances between buildin s.
Community Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 10 of 14
' l�l�.(�tl 1'!'µlt.l Level II Fiexible Development App�ication Review
L Fc
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
1. T'he proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of
adjacent land and buiidings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the heaith or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
Consistent I Inconsistent
X
X
X
X
X
COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM STANDARDS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the
Comprehensive Landscape Program as per CDC Section 3-1202.G:
1. Architectural theme.
a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a
part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed
on the parcel proposed for development; or
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment
proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more
attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for
development under the minimum landscape standards
2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape progratn is
automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is
closed.
3. Community character. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive
landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Cleazwater.
4. Properry values. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape
program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
5. Special area or scenic corridor plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the
comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic
corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted far the area in
which the narcel nronosed for develonment is located.
Consistent Inconsistent
X
X
X
X
NA NA
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of October 3, 2013 and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient,
based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
Community Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 11 of 14
� Cl��i 1'!' �L�� Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
� ��� r .
Findin�s of Fact
The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the
applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial
competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That The 0.747 acre subject property is located on the north side of Gulf to Bay Boulevard
approximately 69 feet west of the South Lake Drive and Gulf to Bay Boulevard intersection;
2. That Parcel ID# 14-29-15-49716-000-0050 is located within the Commercial (C) District and
the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category;
3. That Parcel ID# 14-29-15-49716-000-0010 is located within the Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) District and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category;
4. That the commercially zoned property has 101.30 feet of frontage along Gulf to Bay
Boulevard;
5. That the residentially zoned property has 70.2 feet of frontage along South Lake Drive and
71 feet along Yelvington Avenue;
6. That the overall lot area for the project is 0.747 square feet;
7. That the commercially zoned property is vacant land;
8. That the residentially zoned property consists of a parking lot in a state of disrepair;
9. That the commercially zoned property previously consisted of a restaurant use;
10. That the residentially zoned property consisted of a parking area for the previous restaurant
which operated on the commercial property;
11. That adjacent uses to the south, east and west are zoned C District and developed with retail
sales and services, offices, and restaurant uses;
12. That adjacent uses to the north consist of detached and attached dwelling units;
13. That a 5,350 square foot medical clinic building will be built on the commercially zoned
property;
14. That 28 non-residential off-street parking spaces for the medical clinic use will be located on
the residentially zoned property;
15. The building will be setback 16 feet from the front property line along Gulf to Bay
Boulevard;
16. That the non-residential parking lot will be setback 15.3 feet from the front property line
along South Lake Drive;
17. That the existing driveway entrance to the parking lot along Yelvington Avenue will be
eliminated to allow for a stormwater pond;
18. That in order to provide the required off-street parking spaces, the proposal includes
reductions to required front, north, and south setbacks;
19. That the request includes a reduction to the east perimeter landscape buffer from five feet
wide to two feet wide; a reduction to the west perimeter landscape buffer from five feet wide
to two feet wide; a reduction to the north perimeter landscape buffer from 10 feet wide to
five feet wide; a reduction to the south perimeter landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet;
20. That the proposed overall ISR will be 0.63:
21. That the proposed FAR will be 0.41;
22. That the proposal includes a building height of 30 feet to midpoint of pitched roof; and
23. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Community Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 12 of 14
* lil�.lt��l.l.� Level II Flexible Development Application Review
. �� ..,�_' � i�.�"- : �. .. .
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
Conclusions of Law
The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the
following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-201.1. and 2-
204 of the Community Development Code
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-701.1. and 2-
704 of the Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
204.E of the Community Development Code;
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
704.E of the Community Development Code;
5
0
7.
That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria for a Comprehensive
Landscape Program as per CDC Section 3-1202.G;
That the development proposal is consistent with the applicable Goals, Objectives, and
Policies of the Comprehensive Plan;
That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; and
Flexibility criteria for a Comprehensive Landscape Program CDC Section 3-1202.G.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
this Flexible Development approval to allow a Medical Clinic in a 5,350 square foot building in
the Commercial District with a lot area of 0.30 acres; a lot width of 101.30 feet (along Gulf to
Bay Boulevard); a front setback (south) of 16 feet (to building); side (east) setbacks of two feet
(to canopy), three feet (to pavement), and 24 feet (to building); side (west) setbacks of two feet
(to structure) and five feet (to building); rear setbacks of zero feet (to canopy) and 23 feet (to
building); and a building height of 30 feet (to mid-point of pitched roo�, as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Section 2-704.E ; and a non-residential off-street
parking lot in the Low Medium Density Residential District with a lot area of 0.44 acres (19,484
square feet); a lot width of 70.2 feet (along South Lake Drive) and 71 feet (along Yelvington
Avenue); a front (west) setback of 15.3 feet (to pavement); a front (east) setback of 70 feet (to
pavement); a side (north) setback of five feet (to pavement) and a side (south) setback of zero
feet (to canopy structure); and 28 non-residential off-street parking spaces as a Residential Infill
Project pursuant to Section 2-204.E. as well as a reduction to the width of the east perimeter
landscape buffer from five feet to two feet; a reduction to the width of the west perimeter
landscape buffer from five feet to two feet; a reduction to the width of the north perimeter
landscape buffer from ten feet to five feet; and a reduction of the rear (north) perimeter landscape
buffer from five feet wide to zero feet; and the use of 33 accent and palm trees in-lieu of 20
shade trees as a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3-1402.G., subject to
the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. Prior to the issuance
49716-000-0050 and
of a building permit, that a Unity of Title for Parcel ID# 14-29-15-
Parcel ID# 14-29-15-49716-000-0010 be recorded and submitted to
staff;
2. That an application for a building permit be submitted no later than November 19, 2014,
unless time extensions are granted pursuant to the CDC;
Community Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 13 of 14
� Cl\.t�l 1'tf�L�i Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING @ DEVELOPMENT
P pp DEVELOPMENT REVffW DIVISION
� _,��� .
3. That the final design, color, and elevations of the proposed building be consistent with the
conceptual design, color, and elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
4. That the dumpster enclosure shall be made of a masonry wall or similar material,
architectural details and colors that match the building
5. That the final design and color of the proposed four-foot masonry wall for the non-residential
parking lot be consistent with the primary building, or as modified by, the CDB;
6. That prior to any building permit, the site plan shall show that a wall or fence at least three
feet in height along the south property line with landscaping to be on the external side of the
wall or fence;
7. That any electric and communication panels, boxes, and meters located on the exterior of the
building be painted the same color as the building;
8. That any future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated
with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of
a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff;
9. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, all Land Resource conditions are met;
10. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all of the proposed landscaping shall
be installed;
11. That prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all utilities, including individual
distribution lines serving this development within the right-of-way along the east side of
South Lake Drive and the west side of Yelvington Avenue as well as any overhead wire that
transects the subject property, as applicable, must be installed underground unless
undergrounding is not practicable;
12. That issuance of a development permit by the City of Clearwater does not in any way create
any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and
does not create any liability on the part of the City for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfll the obligations imposed by a state or federal
agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law;
13. That all other applicable local, state and/or federal permits be obtained before
commencement of the development;
14. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the
provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an
adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the
developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the
needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required,
then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. -
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff:
Kevin W. Nurnberger, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS: Photographs of Site and Vicinity
CommuniTy Development Board - November 19, 2013
FLD2013-09032 — Page 14 of 14
Kevin W. Nurnberger
100 S Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
727-562-4567ext2502
kevin.nurnberger(�a,mvclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Planner III March 2011 to present
Planner II October 2010 to March 2011
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees.
Planner
County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009
Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with
planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design
criteria, specifications, regulations,. codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents,
neighborhood organizations, contractors, and developers regarding future projects which included state
and local government agencies.
Site Assistant
Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007
Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on
procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site
assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage.
Development Planner
Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006
Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning
documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations,
the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Virginia Department of Transportation plan, and
Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building
expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties.
City Planner
City Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to 2005
Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with
the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and
conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the City Planning Commission and
Board of Zoning Adjustments.
EDUCATION
University of New Orleans, LA
MA Urban and Regional Planning (2004)
State University of New York at Buffalo, NY
BA Anthropology (1999)
LL
° C earwater
U � ,,�
Planning & Development Department
Fl�xible ��velop�ment Appli�ation
Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Use.s or 1Von-Residential Uses
IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANl' TO SllBMlT COMPLETL� ,41VD CORRECT INFORMATI(�N. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE,
INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION NlAY INVALIDATE Y�9JR APPLIC�lT�ON.
ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLV, ARID SUBMITTED IBN PERSQIV (IVO FAX OR {�ELIVERIES)
TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMEIVT DEPARTMEIVT BY NOON OIN TPiE SCHEDULED �E�4DLINE DATE.
A TOTAI.OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATlON MATERIALS (1 OItIGINAL ANQ 10 COPIES) AS REQUII�ED WITHIN
ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW B�l THE DEVELOPMENT RE!/9EV!/ CONlMI3TEE. SIIBSEQUENT SUBMITTA.L FOR THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WlLL REQUIRE 15 COMPL�TE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION NAATERIAlS (3 OftIGINAL
AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLEiTED, STAPLED AR1D FOLDED INTO SETS.
THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TQ� COIIVEPLY WIT6i ALL APPf.IG46LE REQUIftEMEN�'S OF Tl1E
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN FtEVIEW FEE: $200
APPLICATION FEE: $1,205
PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Liu, Sam C., Liu, Judy Y.
MAILING ADDRESS: 418 N. Moore Ave. Monterey Park Ca. 91754-1016
PHONE NUMBER:
EMAIL:
AGENT Oft REPRESENTATIVE: Eric Egozi
MAILING ADDRESS: 3467 Woodridge Parkway Palm Harbor, Florida 34684
PHONE NUMBER: (727)517-5999
EMAIL: egozimisc@gmail.com
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1608 GULF TO BAY BLVD CLEARWATER 33755
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 14-29-15-49716-000-0050
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LAKEWOOD REPLAT E 1.3 FT OF 5 61 FT OF W 20 FT OF LOT 4& E �{5 FT OF LOT 4& ALL OF LOT 5& W 10 FT OF
LOT 6
PROPOSED USE(S): 5350 SF Medical Office Building (Medical Clinic)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Redevelop existing parcels one in a C(Commercial) and one in a LMDR (Low Medium Density Residential.
Specifically identiiy the request The intent is to build a Medical Clinic on the Commercial portion of the property and park on Residential
(include all requested code flexibility; Portion. This request is to allow commercial parking on the residential lot with 5' and 3.3' side setbacks and
e. g., reduction in required number of 15' street setbacks. Also the request is to allow a Medical Clinic on the Commercial Portion with 5' setback
parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot from the west property line, a 2' setback on the east property line, a 16' setback on the Gulf to bay ROW.
size, iot width, specific use, etc.) (South Property line and a 0' set back between the two properties. The request is also to allow a 30' to the
midpoint of the roof for an Architectural feature on the Gulf to Etay side.
Pianning & Developmen4 Depart�aeret, �B 00 5. NAyrko� k'av�naa�, �9�aevvat�r, FL 337a�, 'iel: 727�•562-4567; Fax: 727-562�865
Page 1 of II f2ev6sed 07l12
�
LL
° � earwater
� . - :;. , .
Plannang & Development Department
Flexible Develop�ment Appli�ation
Data Sheet
PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM
WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOURiD INCOMPIETE AND POSSIBLY DE:FERRED UMTIL THE FOLLOWING
APPLICATION CYCLE.
�" `�'�.�e`u s4 . _.��?:� _ W _...
(MT (f'" �:i "� ..'. i,�� ., , ,. ..:, _.
EXISTING USE (currently existing on site):
C - (Commercia
CG - (Commercial General)
Vacant
PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): Medical Clinic
SITE AREA: (C) 13,074 sq. ft.
GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings):
Existing: 0 sq. ft.
Proposed: 5350 sq.ft.
Maximum Allowable: 7191 sq. ft.
.300
acres
GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses):
First use: 4886 sq. ft. (medical office)
Second use: 464 sq. ft. (storage)
Third use: sq. ft.
FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire siite):
Existing: �
Proposed: 0.41
Maximum Allowable: 0.55
BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (15S floor square footage of all buildings):
Existing: 0 sq. ft. ( 0 % of site)
Proposed: 5,350 sq. ft. ( .41 % of site)
Maximum Permitted: 7,191 sq. ft. ( .55 % of site)
GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer):
Existing: 0 sq. ft. ( 0 % of site)
Proposed: 0 sq. ft. ( 0 % of site)
VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area):
Existing: 4,800 sq. ft. ( 0.37
Proposed: 3,853 sq. ft. ( 0.29
% of site)
% of site)
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, CEearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727'-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 1 of 8 Revised 01/12
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: .37
Proposed: •82
Maximum Permitted; .90
DENSITY {units, rooms or beds per acre):
Existing:
Proposed:
Maximum Permitted:
OFF-STREET PARKING:
Existing: 4
Proposed: o
Minimum Required: 2�
BUlLDING HEIGHT:
Existing: �
Proposed: 30'
Maximum Perrnitted: z5'-5o'
WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $900,000
ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADIACENT PROPERTY:
North: LMRC
South: C
East: C/C
West: C/OS-R
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS , p
I, the undersigned, acknowiedge that ail 5worn to and subscribed before me this t� `'? �-�� da of
� � .. y
representations made in this application are true and , v
, R. ,,. P � b �, � ,!� �� _, � �.'. � E�: . to me and/or by
accurate to the best of rny knowledge and authorize
�,
City representatives to visit and photograph the ;[�' . ,; `'..� _J who is persona�ly know� has
,�_._ _.
property d�ribed in this appiication. produced as identification.
or representative
. _. _ .
Notar:�/ public,
My commission expires:
JANE A. CARPENTER
Gpmrp# EE1416F11
Gxpires 111312016
Planning � Devebpment Departrnent,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727� 62�567; Fax: 727-562�865
Page 3 of 8 Revised 01l12
0
o � � Planning & Development Department
� C earwate Flexible i�evelo ment �i li�ation
� pp
�� Site Plan Subrnittal Package Check list
IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCL.UDE A SITE
PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMa4TION �lND/OR PLANS�:
❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the
subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide
these responses.
❑ Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application
General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses.
❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor incl�uding the location of the property,
dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including
official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to tN�e site.
❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as
provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5.
❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar
marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications �,prepared by a Florida professional
engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair
or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on
private and commercial docks.
❑ A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to .a minimum scale of one inch equals
50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information:
❑ Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon.
❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared.
❑ Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases.
❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is loc:ated within a Special Flood Hazard
Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable.
❑ Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site.
❑ Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points
of access.
❑ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lir�es, storm drains, fire hvdrants and
seawalls and any proposed utility easements.
❑ Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed
stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building; construction permit.
❑ Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection.
0 Location of ofF-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406.
❑ All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and ir�tersections
and bus shelters.
❑ Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building
separations.
❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and Ibuilding materials.
Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwrater, FL 33756, Tel: 727'-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 4 of 8 Revised 01112
❑ Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage.
❑ Demolition plan.
❑ Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally
sensitive areas.
❑ If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the
difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be
provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are
approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further informatic�n.
❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying
those trees proposed to be removed, if any.
C] A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and
condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff.
❑ A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet ane or more
of the following conditions:
■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the
abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or
■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to
unacceptable levels; or
■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve
month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of rnost hazardous locations, provided
by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or
■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require s�ach assessment in the plan review
process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a coristrained roadway or developments
with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors.
❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change o1 use; or an existing use Es improved
or remodeled in a value of Z5% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reFlected on the property appraiser's
current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional
landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following inf�rmation, if
not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval:
❑ Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including
botanical and common names.
❑ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locatiom, including drip line.
❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape c:overage, expressed both in square
feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved araaa coverage of the parking lot and
vehicular use areas.
❑ Location of existing and proposed structures and imprdvements, including but not �limited to sidewalks, walls, fences,
pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overheacl obstructions, curbs, water lines,
sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all grour�d surfaces, and any other features
that may influence the proposed landscape.
❑ Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape
islands and curbing.
❑ Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations.
❑ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any.
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle ,4venue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727�62-4567; Fax: 727-562-4$65
Page 5 of 8 Revised 01;�l2
LL
° � earwater
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Develop►ment Appli�ation
� � " General Applicability Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPIAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE
CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL.
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage�, density and character of adjacent
properties in which it is located.
This single story Medical Clinic will have a moderate impact on the surrounding neighbors. The overall design character and size of the building
will enhance the neighborhood. The Mediterranean Spanish design is in keeping City of Clearwater design objectives.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development an�� use of adjacent land and buildings
or significantly impair the value thereof.
This development is compatible with surrounding neighbors and will not harm or hinder the developmc;nt of the surrounding properties.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the ne�ghborhood
of the proposed use.
This development is a Medical Clinic and will provide a need survice to Clearwater and its neighbors. IT will not affect the health and safety of the
Neighbors.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
This proposed use will have a lower impact when compared to the previous use which was a Restaura�nt.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
This development meets or exceeds the requirements of the community by providing a unique design that has mixed architectural details and
fenestration with a mix of forms, columns setbacks and distinctive roof forms.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, a�:oustic and olfactory and hours of
operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
This operation is primarily a day time use with minimal night time activity. The activities are quiet in nature and will not disturb the neighbors.
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727'-562a1567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 6 of 8 Revised 01l72
�l
� � earwater
U
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Develop�rnent Appli�ation
�� lexibilitv Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFI�' USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET
FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBlECT PROPERTV IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN FIOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION
IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PEit THIS DEVELOPMENT P[tOPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY).
1 See attached description.
�
Ka
4.
5.
6.
8.
Planning & Development Department, 100 S. IlAyrtle Avenue, Cleaew�ater, F'L 33756, Tel: 7a7-562�567; �ax: 727-562-4865
Page 7 of 8 Revised 01!12
o« } Pianning &�Deveiopment Dep�rtment
Y`� �t��� Flexible Standard Develop�nent A�plication
�-
° A�idavit #o Authu�ize Age�t/�Representative
1. Provide names of all pr�perty owners on deed — pRl NT f�ll names:
�.�,' �-1Vl C .cTvJ—.l��l 1� i .c � � _�-� '�1�f� � � �-1 �—
2. That {l am/o+re nare) the owner{s) and r�oerd title holder(s� of the following described property_
� I n !'7 X !-� r , �� � — � .- �Y/ , J C1Yi � / (�D eS t.�, ?.�'i �1�. I
3. That ttiis properiy constitutes.the property for which a requ+est for (describe request):
4. That the. undersigned �has/have) appointed and (dne5/do) ap.point;
as (his/tMeirj agent(s) to exeiut9:dny petitioas or other documents necessary to a€fert such perition;
5. fiat: thi� affidavit has been executed to induce the Gty: of Cieanwater, Florida to consider .ahd act on the above deseeibed
property;:
6: That sfte visits to the property dre n�cessa .ry by Gty representatives In nrder to proc�ss thls dppli�atlon and the nwner
au#horizes G:y representatives to atisit and phatograph the property destribed in this applitation;
7. That (I%we), the und igrred a rity, hereby ertify.that the foregoing is true and correct. ,
t_ r r�
c
Property
Owner � erty Owner
Property Ovrner Property Owner
STA:TE �3F FLORIDA, CO�IN3'X OF PINELLA,S
BEFORE ME THE UNDERSI{3NED, AN OFFICER DULY COMNi15SiONED BY THE LAWS OF 'FHE STATE OF FLORIDA, f�N
��S 18TH paY oF SEPTEMBER , 2013 r, P�RSONALLY APPEARED
SAM CHUN WEI LIU AND JUDY YU—FAR LIU V'+�HO HAVI�VG BEEN F�RS7 DU�Y S4'vORN
DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE,�SHE FULLY UNDERSTAND8 THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFII�AVIT THAT HFJSHE SIGIVED.
��
CHU 7A0 WP.NG �J
Commission # 1888274 (.� '�,' `i1'
Z,=� - Notary Public - California D Notary Public Si ature
z Los Angdles County
Not Y Comm. Exp+res �Aay 3, 2014 � My Commission'E ires� f'�'� � 3��
P16n�Mg � D9vebpment Dapar4nenl,100 3. MyWe Avenoe, Clearwater, FL 33756. Tet: 727-5�82at667; Fax: 727-SB2-+d885
Page 6 at 8 Revis�d O�fN2
Tampa Plastic Surgery
1608 Gulf io Bay
FLD2013-09032
2-704.E Comprehensive infil! redevelopment projects.
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use
andlor development standards set forth in this zoning district;
RESPONSE: The development would be impractical due to the finro zoning classifications C and
LMDR where the Medical Clinic cannot be partially located or� the residentially zoned
property and this creates a hardship unique to this property. The "C" zoning allov�s for
a maximum ISR of .90 this project proposes a ISR of .63 as a� total 2-parcels and .77
for the "C" zoned parcel. You will also note that with the current Zoning regulations on
this lot if the required set backs were imposed that the ISR max would only be .52 well
below that which is allowed.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and b�asic planning objectives
of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district;
RESPONSE: This development has proposed a 5' enhanced landscape buffer on all sides and rear
property lines and 16' along the Gulf to Bay frontage. The building design is in
concurrence with guidelines used elsewhere in the city to include: location of the
building aligned with adjacent buildings. Also the building ma:�sing and scale allowrs for
relief on the facade facing the street.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and ord�erly development an�
improvement of surrounding properties;
RESPONSE: This development is within the �ite and along similar set back lines and will not afFect
the neighboring properties for continuing to operate or impinge on the future
development of those properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of tt�e proposed developKnent;
RESPONSE: This developrraent will have a positive impact on the adjoining properties due to th�
increased value represented by a new development in this ar��a of the city.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be
compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristecs of
the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the follovving
okajectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum s,tandard, flexible standard
or flexible development use;
RESPONSE: Medical Clinic is permitted thru the flexible standard as a comprehensive infilF
Redevelopment Project. in this zoning district.
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the city's economic base by
diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
RESPONSE: The proposed Medical Clinic will have an economic impact to the city by prov�ding
a service to the City's population in need for this type of tireatment.
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing
economic contributor; IV/A
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; N/A
e. The proposed uss provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and
rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or NiA
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or pre�servation of a working
waterfront use. N/A
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off street parking are
justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following de:�ign objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly d�evelopment and
improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district;
RESPONSE: This development is within the site arad a9ong sirnilar set t�ack lines and will not
affect the neighboring properties for continuing to operate or impinge on the future
development of those propeeties.
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelirn�s adopted by the cifiy;
RESPONSE: The facades of the buildirag reflect a unified architectural :�tyle (Mediterranean
Spanish). There is a hierarchy of fa�ade treatment that foirms a cohesive and
visually interesting ciesign.
c. The design, scale and intensity of the praposed development support the established or
emerging character of an area;
RESPONSE: The design will help enhance and develop fhe emerging r.haracter of this corridor.
�
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesiing and aftracti�e appearance, the proposed
development incorporates a substantial number of the following des,ign elements:
• Changes in horizontal building planes; •
RESPONSE: Building planes very along the front, sides and rear of the building.
• Use of architectural dstails such as coiumns, • cornices, strino�courses, pilasters,
porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
RESPO�VSE: Columns, cornices, porticos and architectural details are a part of this de�ign.
• Variety in materials, colors and textures; •
RESPONSE: The building has a base with color difFerent from the I�ody, lattice work for
planting to grow in archways, cera,rrr�ic tiles and extended cupola .
• Distinctive fenestration patterns; •
RESPONSE: Fenestration patterns very as a part of the "Mediterr��raean Spanish" design.
• Building step backs; and •
RESPONSE: The building has 3 offset along the street frantage.
• Distinctive roofs forms. •
RESPONSE: The roof forms are both flat and hippeci to allov�r for this unique design.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and
appropriate distances befirveen buildings
RESPONSE: This development has proposed a 5' enhanced landscap�� buffer on all sides and
rear property lines and 16' along the Gulf to Bay frontage.
LL
° C earwater
�.
Resedentea! Infill
P�annang � Development Department
Flexible I)evelop�xnent Appli�ation
Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Use,s or Non-Residential Uses
IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COIVIPLETE AND CORRECT INFORIV9AT16)R�. �41VY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE,
INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT IMFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLI�A"�sON.
ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND C06tRECTLY, AND SU�MBT°fED IEiI PERSOAI (NO FAX OR �ELIl�ERIES)
TO THE PLANMING & DEVELOPIMENT DEPARTMENT BY IVOON OI� TliE SCHEDlIL�D �EADL9NE DA7E.
A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 OR9ialNAL AND� 10 COPIES) A5 REQIJIRED WITHIN
ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPIVIENB' REVIEW C011AR911�EE. SUBSEQUENT Sl1BMI1TA,L FOIt THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SE�S OF �L9�RE5 AND QIPPLICATION M/�TERIALS 11 ORIGINAL
AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATlOIVS ARE REQUIRED TO �E COLLATED, �3'/�PLED i4�JD EOL�ED INTO SETS.
THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AG6tEES TO COMPLX lMEYFI ALL A�P�ILICGlI�LE REQUIREMEN�'S OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELUPMENT CODE.
FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200
APPLICATION FEE: $1,205
PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Liu, Sam C., Liu,ludy Y.
MAILING ADDRESS: 418 N. Moore Ave. Monterey Park Ca. 91754-1016
PHONE NUMBER:
EMAIL:
AGENT OR REPRESEIVTATIVE: Eric Egozi
MAILING ADORESS: 3467 Woodridge Parkway Palm Harbor, Florida 34684
PHONE NUMBER: (727)517-5999
EMAIL: egozimisc@gmail.com
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1608 GULF TO BAY BLVD CLEARWATER 33755
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 14-29-15-49716-000-0010
LEGAL DESCRIPTIOIV: LAKEWOOD REPLAT S 71.2 FT OF LOT 1 LESS S 1 FT OF W 41 FT
PROPOSED USE(S): Parking for a 5350 SF Medical Office Building (Medical Clinic)
DESCRIPTION OF RE4UEST:
Specifically identify the request
(include all requested code flexibility;
e. g., reduction in required number of
parking spaces, height, setbacks, �ot
size, lot width, specific use, etc.)
Redevelop existing parcels one in a C(Commercial) and one in a LMDR (Low Medium Density
Residential. The intent is to build a Medical Clinic on the Commercial portion of the property and
place the parking on Residential portion. This request is to ��Ilow commercial parkinQ on the
residential lot with 5' and 3.3'side setbacks and 15' street se�tbacks..
Planning & Developmenk Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, C9earumak�r, �L 3375fi, Tel: 72� -562�6567; Fax: 727-562-4•865
Page 1 of 8 f3evesed 01 /12
° learwater
��
U' �
Plananing & Development Department
Flexible l��evelo�xnent Appli�cation
Data Sheet
PLEASE ENSIlRE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, I!V ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM
WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOSVIPLETE AND POSSI�LY DE:FEFtRED f1NTIL TIiE FOLLOWING
APPLICATION CYCLE.
��,d�,m., ,r e;,c.�.� ...,"f'.
q .'F � i I .. ' ' e, ;, _,,.. . . —.:.
EXISTING USE (currently existing on site)
LMDR- (Low Medium Density Residential
RU - (Residential Urba
Parkin� Lot
PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): Parking for Medical Clinic
SITE AREA: 19,484 sq. ft. .447 acres
GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings):
Existing: 0 sq. ft.
Proposed: 0 sq. ft.
Maximum Allowable: 7794 sq. ft.
GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multip�e uses):
First use: 0 sq. ft.
Second use: 0 sq. ft.
Third use: sq. ft.
FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: �
Proposed: �
Maximum Allowable: 0.40
BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRIIVT (1St floor square footage of all buildings):
Existing: 0 sq. ft. ( 0 % of site)
Proposed: 0 sq. ft. ( 0 % of site)
Maximum Permitted: 7,794 sq. ft. ( .40 % of site)
GREEN SPACE WITHIIV VEIiICULAFt USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site;. not perimeter buffer):
Existing: 0 sq. ft. ( 0 % of site)
Proposed: 0 sq. ft. ( 0 % of site)
VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area):
Existing: 19,283 sq. ft. ( 0.99
Proposed: 10,735 sq. ft. ( 0.55
% of site)
% of site)
Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 72T-562-4567; Fax: 727a�62-4t865
Page 2 of 8 P2evmsec9 Oi/12
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (totai square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existi�g: 0.99
Proposed: 0.54
Maximum Permitted: 0.65
DEN51'fY (units, rooms or beds per acre�:
Existing: �
Proposed: �
Maximum Permitted: 5
OFF-STREET PARKING:
Existing: 44
Proposed: 28
Minimum Required: �
BUILDtNG HEIGHT:
Existing: 0
Proposed: �
Maximum Permitted: 30'
WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $300,000
ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADIACENT PROPERTY:
North: LMRC
South; C
East: C
West: OS-R
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS : R
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that aii Sworn to and su6scribed before me this Ar `��� `k�`�"' _ day of
representations made in this application are true and „� J �,.` L� ,.,
accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize `�" `` - . to me and/or by
City representatives to visit and photograph the `'�`� �-: ,�;'% ' J who is personally know� has
.
property d�ribed in this apptication. produced as identification.
or representative
- r'^ �
Notar.y' pubtic,
My commission expires:
JANE A. CARPENTER
��
_, -
'y. - ,' � Gomm# EE1�1Fi41
's � ��� �xpires 111312016
Planning 8 Devebpment Depar6nent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tet: �27�62d56T; Fax: 72T-562-4865
Page 3 of 8 Revised 01/17
o Planning & Development Department
��earwater Flexible Develo ment A li�ation
_� . _ _ � p�
� � Site Plan Subxnittal Package Check list
IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCl.UDE A SITE
PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORNlATION AND/06t PLANS:
❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the
subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide
these responses.
❑ Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application
General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses.
❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of thie property,
dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including
official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site.
❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile horne park as
provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5.
❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar
marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida �rofessional
engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required far the repair
or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on
private and commercial docks.
❑ A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equats
SO feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following inf��rmation:
❑ Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon.
❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared.
❑ Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed ta be constructed in phases.
❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard
Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable.
❑ Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site.
❑ Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-sit�� and off-site, with proposed points
of access.
❑ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and
seawalls and any proposed utility easements.
❑ Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing th� proposed
stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demor�strate compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of buildin�; construction permit.
❑ Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for acce:ssibility for collection.
❑ Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406.
❑ All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and iritersections
and bus shelters.
0 Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setback��, structural overhangs and building
separations.
0 Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials.
Planning 8� Development Department, 100 S. Myrkle Avenue, Clearwater, FL, 33756, Tel: 72��-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-�865
Page 4 of 8 Revised 01�/12
❑ Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage.
❑ Demolition plan.
❑ Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally
sensitive areas.
❑ If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (exc:luding those standards where the
difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a par�Cing demand study will need to be
provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking st<�ndards are
approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further informatian.
❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, ancJ identifying
those trees proposed to be removed, if any.
❑ A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and
condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff.
❑ A TrafFic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generai:ed net new trips meet ane or more
of the following conditions:
■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the
abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or
■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensave Plan to
unacceptable levels; or
■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five report�ible accidents within a prior twelve
month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided
by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or
■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require soach assessment in the plan review
process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a coristrained roadway or developments
with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors.
❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change o1f use; or an existing use is improved
or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's
current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional
landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information, if
not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval:
❑ Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including
botanical and common names.
❑ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line.
❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape ��overage, expressed boi:h in square
feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and
vehicular use areas.
0 Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences,
pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overheaii obstructions, curbs, uvater lines,
sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features
that may influence the proposed landscape.
❑ Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape
islands and curbing.
❑ Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations.
❑ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sigl�t triangles, if any.
Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Adenue, CBearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 72i°-5621b567; Fax: 727-562-�865
Page 5 of 8 Revised 01/12
° learwater
�C
Plannang & Development Department
Flexible I�evelo�►ment Appli�ation
� �=� � � General A��'lica�iility Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLlCA�9LITV �RITERIA EXPLAINIIVG HOW, IN [�ETAIL, THE
CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED V111TH PER THIS DEVELOF'MENT PttOPOSA9..
1. The proposed development of Yhe land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coveragE�, density and character of adjacent
properties in which it is located.
The proposed use as a parking lot to replace and existing larger p�rking lot dvith enhanced landscaps and vNith
the addition of the retention area will visually improve the area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings
or significantly impair the value thereof.
This development is compatible with surrounding neighbors and will not harm or hinder the development of the surrounding properties.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of the proposed use.
This development is a Medical Clinic and will provide a need survice to Clearwater and its neighbors. It will not affect the health arid safety of the
Neighbors.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
This proposed use will have a lower impact when compared to the previous use ��hich was a parking lot for
a Restaurant.
The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate� vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
This development meets or exceeds the requiremeni:s of the community by providing a nPw
parking lot for a Medical Clinic that has mixed architectural details and fenestration with a
mix o orms, co umns setbac s an distinctive roof forms.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of
operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
This operation is primarily a day time use with minimal night time activity. The activities are quiet in nature and will not disturb the neighbors.
Planning & Developmenk �epartment, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearw�ater, FL �375�, Tel: 72i'-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4r865
Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12
0
� � earwater
�=,
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Develo�ment Appli�ation
�� lexibility Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFI�C USE(S) BEIIVG REQUESTED AS SET
FORTH IN THE ZONIN6 DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCAT�D. EXPLAIIV FlOW, IRl DETAIL, EACH CRITERION
IS BEING COMPIIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPe4ftATE SFIEETS AS IVECESSARY).
1 See attached description.
2.
4.
5.
6.
8.
Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Cleareivater, FL 33756, Tel: 72i'-562-4567; Eax: 727-562-4.865
Page 7 of 8 Revised O�112
o w Planning &�De'velopment Dep�rtment
r� ����t�� Flexible Star�dard Development A}�plicatic�n
.. .
° ,A#fidavit to Autha�ize Agent f Representative
1. Pravide names of all property awners on deed - PRI NT full names:
, � �,�2��.1._% i .c ���-�( �r'i� � �- � �-�---
2. That {! am/we are) the owner{s) a�d r�cord titie
1 I .,.. �i l' _�� ._" 1 � 9Z,.
3. fiat this propeci�t constifiutes.the prvpertY ft�r
of the following destribed property:
a �equestfor (descrik>e request}:
�F. That the undersigned {has/trave)appointed and (does/db) ap.point:
r
as (his/their) agent(s) to e�cecute:any petitions or other dxuments necessary ta affeet such F>elition;
5. fiat:thi� a#fidavit has been �cewted to induce the Gty of Clearwrater, florida to constder and act on the above deseribed
property;.
6. That site vfsits to xhe property 2re n�cessary by Uty rep�esentatives In order to process tt�is applicatlon and the awner
authoni�s G.y reprtseniatives ta xisit anrl phr�tqgraph the propercy destribed in this appiitaiian;
7. That (I/we), the unde igr�ed.�u rity, hereby ertify.that Che F�regoing is true and correct. ,
,. , �,_�'�Z��--
PirOp��1+
Owner �62�' �, s���� a'Perz1' Owner
{'coperty Owner PropertN Owner
STA'�E �DF F10RlDA. CO�iV7'X OF PINELLAS
BEFE?'RE METHE UNDEfZcSIGNEp, AN 4FFICER DULY COMNk15SIONEU BX SHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON
TM�S 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER _ 2013 �, PERSONALLY APPEAREQ
SAM CHUN WEI LIU AND JUDY YU-FAR LIU VvHO HAV�NG BEEN FIRST DU�Y Svo►ORN
DEPOSED AIVO SAYS THAT HE.�SHE FUiLY UNDERSTRNDS THE C4NTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THf43 HElSHE SIGNED.
CHU TAO WA.NG �J Q .
Commission # 1888274 C� T�,,,i, �' —
Z;�� - Notary Public - California D Notary Public Si ��ture
z ° Los Angetes County
Nn��� Y Comm.Tpires Ma 3, 2014' �y Cnmmission E ire5: �'� � 3�� —
PiBnning 8 DevetopmonC Departrnent,100 3. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33Y58. Tet: 727-582fi567; Fax�evls d O�SNY
page 6 ai 8
Residential infill
Tampa Plastic Surgery
1608 Gulf to Bay
FLD2013-09032
2-204 Flexibility Criteria - E.Residential infil/ projects.
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for redevel��pment is otherwise
impractical without deviations from one or more of the following : intensity: other development
standards;
RESPONSE: The development would be impractical due to the two zoning� classifications C an�
LMDR where the Medical Clinic cannot be partially located on the residentially zo�ed
property and this creates a hardship unique to this property. The "C" zoning allov+is for
a maximum ISR of .90 this project proposes a ISR of .63 as �� total 2-parcels and .77
for the "C" zoned parcel. You will also note that with the currE�nf Zoning regulations on
this lot if the required set backs were imposed that the ISR max would only be .52 well
below that which is allowed.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not
materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
RESPONSE: This development will have a positive impact on the adjoininc� properties due to the
increased value represented by a new development in this area of the city.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitked in tlie district:
RESPONSE: Parking lots have been accepted in this district where Commercial zoning districts abut
residential zoning districts.
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjaceni; land uses:
RESPONSE: There is an existing use is a parking lot which is being replaced and there are other
parking lots in close proximity IE. Across Yelvington Ave to the east.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residenti��l infill project will up�rade
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for developrrient.
RESPONSE: The facades of the building to use this parking lot reflect a un�ifed architectural st}�le
(Mediterranean Spanish). There is a hierarchy of fa�ade treai:ment that forms a
cohesive and visually interesting design. As a n�vv dev�lopm��nt oi this type vvill
increase the value of the surrounding parcels.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates form and function which enhances the
community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel p�roposed for developrnent
and the Coty of Clearwater as a whole;
RESPONSE: This development will have a positive impact on the adjoining properties due to the
increased value represented by a new development in this area of the city. The
proposed Medical Clinic will also have an ecanomic impact tc� the city by providing a
service to the City's population in need for this t�pe of treatment.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot with, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access, or other
development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for redevelopment ;and the city of Cleanroater
as a whole.
RESPONSE: This development is within the site and along similar set back lines and will not
affect the neighboring properties for continuing to operate or impinge on the f�ature
development of those properties. The facades of the buili�ing reflect a unified
architectural style (Mediterranean Spanish). There is a hierarchy of fa�ade
treatment that forms a cohesive and visually interesting design. This development
also has proposed a 5' enhanced landscape buffer on all sides and rear prop�rty
lines and 16' along the Gulf to Bay frontage. This develo��ment will also have �
positive impact on the adjoining properties due to the increased value repres�nted
by a new development in this area of the city. The propo�sed Medical Clinic will
have an economic impact to the city by providing a servic.e to the City's popul�tion
in need for this type of treatment.
LL �
°� �� ��ar�vater
U ..,
Planning & Development Department
Comprehensive Landscaping Application
IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE,
INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION.
ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DEUVERIES)
TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE.
A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPtES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN
ARE TO BE SUBMIITED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVEIOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE
COMMUNIT1f DEVELOPMENT BOARD, IF NECESSARY, Wlll REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION
MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOI.pED
INTO SETS.
THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABIE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
, COMMUNITY DE1fELOPMENT CODE.
PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Liu, Sam C., Liu, Judy Y.
MAILING ADDRESS: 418 North Moore Avenue, Monterey Park, CA 91754 �.
PHONE NUMBER:
EMAII: -
AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Eric Egozi
MAILING ADDRESS: 3467 Woodridge Parkway, Palm Harbor, FL 34684
PHONE NUMBER: 727 51T-5999
EMAII: egozimiscQgmaii.com
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
DESCRiPTION OF REQUEST:
Spec�colly identify the request
(indude vll requested code Jtexibility,•
e.g., reduction In required number of
parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot
size, loi width, specifrc use, etc.J;
1608 Gulf to Bay Bouievard, Clearwater, FL
Redevelop existing parcels one in "C" and one in "LMDR". Request to allow
commercial parking on residentiai lot. Reduced side setbacks of 5' to 3' in
limited areas, and 7 5' street setbacks.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS �
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this �
representations made in this application are true and day of �
accurate to the best of my knowiedge and authorize �--- d � . to me and/or by
City representatives to visit and photograph the � r � �., � q a�„t who is ersonaily known has
property described in this application. .
--°� ?
produced as identification.
y
5ignat e pe o er or representative N ary public, „�a�r •--- ���
� � � NO�`ARY PUBLIC
My commission expires: _ '������%A7E OF. FLORIDA
i4 ��
Panni1 � Zp�re�opment pepartmen}, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 3375B, Tel: 727-b6 �;�a1r 727��62.�{gg,�
�
Reviaed 01112
LL
° C earwater
�
U
Planning & Development Department
Comprehensive Landscaping Application
Flexibilitv Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE FIVE (5) FLD(IBIUTY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION
IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING PROPOSAL.
1. Architectural Theme:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscaping pragram shail be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the
principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
T�C�"' (�`htivSGa�l� 15 DG''�la•�Y, 7v �Yl�z.� ?� /9�L�T�'��-
7�tm6 �l vs�� P.9'�ryrs � o7��i�i� /j'��—axa� .
��A�Tr ltiCG v4�5 �i�L%��X-�'L!� .A'�.Gl� !�/�9�'r./,� i /Y!�'T11�[dl�CiS_
OR
b. The design, charader, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping
progrem shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for
development under the minimum landscape standards.
���G'�l�lu� ��ry�zn�h �-�2�r' /vv��C.�Pr��� v5��-�r
l�i�h20 j_�-� �GorP�L S�cfCCC?� �J � �4-D�il�'�i'
� lo /� d��-17�2. 7�� 5 �,Q.fLu�x�i� ��i�G�T7�i .
2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscaping program is automatically controlled so that the
lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the
community character of the City of Clearwater.
iJG/'�r�� 1j%� �'�il.��A'LS SU�7�G`��b� /tiGG�%.ti� /�'��AYI S� OT�/G�G
77Z�.o�G�s !,�-��ur p/��,/.� .4- �Ylvr��T� a� c�o�z,�n2.8rio
��N�s .
4. Properiy Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program will have a beneficial impact
on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development..
�E" G6v� o� �G�7'7�-6 � %� �,�- �SCUs�7� �x,r� Da��c`5
G�� u- � /�U� !/YIl�iell(/� ]?!6S �%���%' �� �/.�'d� �/� c��
�J�9c.�r n�l,2c c-�.s .
5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is
consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in
which the parcel proposed for development is located.
P�r�-� �z�n�c..� � �-,G rz ��' �.-cr,���s ,o•�► s
Gvo�.�2.a�w s � a7�l�Z �✓l�h�i Gs_ C'�srs7��
� <?� a�X� �r�=drL ��-o,���-r�5 i� ��� .
Planning & Development Departrnent,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727�62-4567; Fax: 727�62-4865
Page 2 of 2 Revised 01/12
� ��
�� �•
; Q.
, _ ___.__.w
;�
i�
' ��
�,
u
�
0
�
��
� �� �� ��
��
!�� ��
�°� �
9
.. _�
! .�1
j
1�'
�� ��
��
�
O •
Y� �
��
_,-�J
..... ._.�__........
.......-.-��Ii
i�
!�. .[►v�` s
6�
�[ k�
:.,.,_
,. : ._..
d.:,� _.
ir._' =.:: J
t�
1
1
� Y':e»S. �... `
� � E �� "� � # �� -��� �t' �ryt{ i .i
j ! `
_ � � f � � � 1 t��e•r-�
� m m ti � [< <� �
� p � �� � r �
� �t�
�— n —Ci j} z 1,i�' 1
m -� ,� �
� � � Z ;� Ei
o ....... n c �� d t '������
�f��. ��flii `isas�•aista.a.��� .S � f m �"iYr o iir �'R'-'f l � �t• C��ir{s� �l
£�1��lii»�y�■����E•tt�cyo� ����c��1�� �� � y���# ��{� � � il�r• �if� ji;�t� `���,�{P�i
R � � � r��s � �� '_' ��� �� 1 � h �s�i•�
������t� xl ��� i�1���t� fit����'` j� � t 1
� 1 F � � 1 � 1 f # �} 1 ` � ji� � •` • • r a .rr�•• c�
i� �i, � �1���' � ��1{�i �i���f�� �� ��!��� ei���#��(�f�t;fll:��,���i�����+r� ' ���.,�:.•�� ■z
� p � �j ± � � � ���� }�;�,�;�I�t jEff �,�F il;��� f�[(���;��3�,��e�� g
^ � t [ t t t j tt t if [ t m . • . t e. t 1.t��
d � Z s 1�[ t f.i1 i, t j �� i`� �� i� `i�� �!11 ��� ftir �� i� ��1'f }•�;;•;i�� ,
i}t�� �t41 i t1 �� � � i i!t � {! � . �l •.j t i .�� �Il�'�
��' �x � � ff# � �iJl jt �i� ri � f ` � � 5 �� � *} �t ��i `�;il.ii t!!.! t ��� ���f��`[ i 1
i 1 . i, E
o �� �
� � E _ ���� #fl ��1�� s�i
�� �i"� MR���RtiRKMX�K�IKM �i�4�FRFi � ��f i� � �t �i1 !�!I
r !rr'�!R R�FtfsFtiilR�ilR a:of..F.R � ! ,!� t�=� �i[1(� JI:
I� 1h4RR� kR��iX�[lRR�X�K4 �f#��1�t� p i�� �� i��J� r' l
�a }t�;}� iww���w�w������� �ij►� � � 1 ii�� �t� } itE �� �
! '�
�
t i!}
�_ ��M���Mt tKM�htMt�MKttRMK i�������� ;��� � j�l� 1`j;
R�c�R: ti��ititFtFRtiti (11tilfli � `��t t �
A C DA WPLEY DESIGN ASSOCIATES, itvc. Landscape Development Plan
� r.,, � �sse�.�< .,...a.m ..00,.F��,�o..3.se,.P���,,z„e,_:s�o
o -
LANDSCAPL ARCHfTCCTURL•SIYC PLANNING
� TAMPA PLASTIC SURGERY
��..��...�..uoai.e. i.=........nn�aor."c GWfin&�vBoukvard.Clenrv.akv.FlatlT
,
i�� ���,.�I (�� ��
t. , _
li! ����'. ��t�� �°
�';t'�ji'!�'�
II F� �1 • 1 �
�E�`��r�
, � �; �' i
� �
.
�
-
Nationai Society
of
Professionai Engineers
Florida Engineering
Society
American Society
of
Civii Engineers
Florida Surveying
and
Mapping Society
American Congress
on
Surveying and Mapping
Institute
of
Transportation Engineers
Florida Plannin9
antl
Zoning Association
National Association
of
Environmental Professionals
�
� �
� ' • • / • . .
Engineers - Surveyors - Planners
TAMPA PLASTIC SURGERY
Drainage and Detention System Design Calculations
J.N.: 37443
August 23, 2013
Revised October 8, 2013
This plan results in a net decrease in impervious area. Water quality treatment meeting the
requirements of the Southwest Florida water management district and the City of Clearwater has
been incorporated into the design. Water volume storage, as required for retrofit in accordance
with the City of Clearwater drainage manual, has been provided, and a 25 year storm, 24 hour
duration routing for both pre and post development conditions has been provided demonstrating
compliance with Environmental Resource Permit requirements.
All of the site currently has positive outfall to Crest Lake (AKA Excelsor Lake) which has a
positive outfall to Stevenson Creek which outfalls to the Gulf-of-Mexico.
Site Data•
1. Site Area = 32,558 S.F. (0.747 Acres)
2. Total Existing Impervious Area = 22,110 S.F. (0.508 Acres)
3. Total Proposed Impervious Area = 20,667 S.F. (0.474 Acres)
4. Exiting Soil Classification: "Urban Land" Astatula base soil group (HSG A)
Proposed Sta�e Stora�e Data:
El. Surface Area
70.05 0 S.F.
70.16 1,688 S.F.
71.0 2,238 S.F.
72A 2,997 S.F.
72.6 3,506 S.F.
Approved by:
� /D- �l3
om�s , . �Ra�e�iffe; ,�F�� °'-; (date)
...
�lor�`'���irs,in8�r;.s I,ic'e�,saiklcs:>�E 42044
' ��.` `�, e� �d 4�� • "r, w
� � . � •;'� r
� '• .a
.1':D.����i-T" ;';�y �
, \ • - Q+^
.� i� o � � ,
Y, � .
`.,� �1i��ad
"' " ; ` , v�9� � �. -��"
� .. :�
� � � ��� �� � , � + .
, ✓ � . tc� Cj •' e •
. . f `�' � t�� � ��� � '��.Y*�JwV
. yn�''y13�� `: t y'%+`t` •�`�,�i.• `�0�"� .
�" Q.• F `
• . "'�e•."'�Q.f'.gQ+'�'� . .
29228 U.S. Hwy. 19 North Pinellas: (72� 784-3965
Clearwater, Fiorida 33761 Pasco: (727) 842-7635
www.lbsonline.com Fax: (727} 784-8153
n
Water Qualitv
The detention system is designed to provide water quality treatment for the first 1/2" of run-off using
effluent filtration Volume is required to be reestablished in 72 hours with a safety factor of 2(36 hours.
The system as designed provides the required volume and reestablishes the required volume in 0.46 hours.
0.747 Ac x 43,560 S.F. / Ac / xl"/ 12"/ Ft. x'/z"= 1,355 C.F. Storage required
Storage Required for the First'/z Inch of Runoff 1,355 C.F.
FILTER DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
(USING DARCEY'S LAW)
WATER HEAD INCR TOTAL INCR DIST. HYD. AREA FLOW AVG. INCR
LEVEL W/L TO HEAD VOLUME VOLUME FILTER GRAD. FILTER Q=KIA FLOW TIME
IN C/L (FT) (CF) (CF) MEDIA I=H/TD A=LxW C.F.H Q1+Q2/2 (^T)
BASIN S/D (^H) (V) (^V) (FT) (SF) C.F.H (HOURS)
70.81 3.160 1355.1
0.152
70.66 3.008 1037.0
0.152
70.51 2.856 742.5
0.152
70.35 2.704 471.4
0.152
70.20 2.552 224.0
0.152
TOTAL TIME= 0.46 HOURS
2
318.08
2
294.55
2
271.02
2
247.99
2
223.96
1.58 390 3339.8
3259.48 0.10
1.504 390 3179.16
3098.83 0.10
1.428 390 3018.51
2938.18 0.09
1.352 390 2857.86
2777.53 0.09
1.276 390 2697.21
2616.89 0.09
L.W.L. or BOTTOM ELEVATION = 70.05 Ft. (N.A.V.D)
FILTRATION STORAGE WATER LEVEL= 70.81 Ft.-(N.G.V.D.)
AVERAGE CENTERLINE OF SUBDRAIN or CONTROL ELEVATION = 67.65 Ft.-(N.A.V.D.)
WATER SURFACE AT L.W.L. = 1,396 S.F.
WATER SURFACE AT FILTRATION WATER LEVEL = 2,170 S.F.
DRAINAGE AREA = 0.747 ACRES
REQUIRED STORAGE VOLUME:
0.747 Ac. x 43560 / 24 = 1,355 CUBIC FEET
1,355 CUBIC FEET - STORAGE AVAILABLE
Required Stora�e Volume and Maximum Discharge Rate for City of Clearwater
Water Ouantity Repuirements:
Volume of detention was established by multiplying time of concentration times DELTA Q. The design
provides for the outlet control structure (weir, pipe, etc.) designed to restrict other than pre-development Q.
Rational City required pre-development rate of run-off:
0.747 Ac. X 3.4"/hour x 0.20 = 0.51 C.F.S.
Size of discharge slot:
Top of slot Considered (projected City 25 year Storm water leve172.1 - slot invert 70.81 = 1.29' (H)
Page 2 of 4
Utilizing the Francis formula
Q = 3.33(L-0.2H) H ^1.5
0.51 C.F.S. = 333(L-0.2x(1.29)) 1.29^1.5
Solving for L, L=0.36' (432")
Therefore, a slot width of 432" will limit the discharge to the maximum allowable pre-development rate of
discharge.
Storage Required:
Existing Rational C used 0.20
Existing CxA = 0.747 x 0.2 = 0.15
Weighted Post Development Rational C
Pervious area: 0.20 x 0.22 = 0.044
Impervious Area 0.95 x 0.48 = 0.456
Water Surface Area 1.00 x 0.05 = 0.050
Weighted CxA = 0.55
Delta C= 0.55 - 0.15 = 0.40/0.747 = 0.5355
The existing time of Concentration is < 15 mins.
In accordance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria "The design hydrograph is an
isosceles triangle with a time of concentration equal to one half of the duration. Detention design shall
incotporate a minimum time of concentration of one hour & 25-year storm intensity."
The log-Pherson intensity curves show the 1 hour value for this 25 year storm to be 3.4".
Using the rational formula, Q=CxIxA modified as required for the Delta C per the City guide,
Q=(0.5355) x 3.4"/hr. x 0.747 Ac. = 136 C.F.S.
136 C.F.S. x 60 sec/min x 60 min/hr = 4,896 C.F.
STAGE STORAGE DATA
W/L SURFACE SURFACE VOLUME VOLUME
S.F. Acres C.F. A.F.
70.05 0 0.0000 0
70.10 711 0.0163 19
70.20 1709 0.0392 183
70.30 1781 0.0409 358
70.40 1854 0.0426 540
70.50 1929 0.0443 730
70.60 2005 0.0460 928
70.70 2083 0.0478 1133
70.80 2162 0.0496 1346
Water Quality Water Level = 70.81
(1,355 C.F. required for the first
0.0000
0.0004
0.0042
0.0082
0.0124
0.0168
0.0213
0.0260
0.0309
1/2")
Page 3 of 4
�
70.90 2243
71.00 2325
71.10 2408
71.20 2493
71.30 2580
71.40 2668
71.50 2757
71.60 2848
71.70 2941
71.80 3035
71.90 3130
72.00 3227
72.10 3325
Required 25 year
72.20 3414
72.30 3503
72.40 3593
72.50 3684
72.60 3777
0.0515 1567
0.0534 1796
0.0553 2034
0.0572 2280
0.0592 2534
0.0612 2797
0.0633 3069
0.0654 3351
0.0675 3641
0.0697 3941
0.0719 4250
0.0741 4569
0.0763 4897
storm City Volume
0.0784 5235
0.0804 5582
0.0825 5937
0.0846 6302
0.0867 6676
0.0360
0.0412
0.0467
0.0523
0.0582
0.0642
0.0705
0.0769
0.0836
0.0905
0.0976
0.1049
0.1124
4,896 C.F.)
0.1202
0.1281
0.1363
0.1447
0.1533
Page 4 of 4