The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2013-09031� � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD � 1��t�r - � EVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .�,.,,�,,. PLANNING AND D � �-- STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: CASE: REQUEST: November 19, 2013 E.2. FLD2013-09031 Flexible Development application for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for accessory structures (carports) located in front of the principal structure pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 6-109; as well as a reduction to the front (north, south and east) perimeter landscape buffers from 15 feet to zero feet, a reduction of the required interior parking island area from 150 to 80.15 square feet, a reduction in the square footage of interior landscaping from 14,981 to 12,425, an increase the number of parking spaces in a row from 10 to 21, a reduction in the number of required interior trees and a reduction to the required width of interior islands from eight to five feet, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G. GENERAL DATA: Agent ........................... Jerry Panagrossi; Regatta Beach Club Condominium Association, Incorporated Owner ............. Regatta Beach Club Condominium Association, Incorporated LoCation .......................... 880 Mandalay Avenue; west side of the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Kipling Plaza Property Size .................... 3.4 acres Future Land Use Plan...... Residential High (RH) Zoning .......................... High Density Residential (HDR) District Adjacent Zoning.... North: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District South: LMDR District East: LMDRT District West: Open Space/ Recreation (O/SR) District Existing Land Use ............. Attached Dwellings (349 units) Proposed Land Use.. ..... Attached Dwellings (349 units) � " T� ,` ,k �y - � . - " a . � �� .,'� ., t��q� � {�� i�� i � ,� `�R,,,� �� a�. \ �• � . � :� t�� •�.. r �� I `' �s ��'�-`��.� $ � {� , r,,.� ♦ t� �� r � . � !1� . ° �!� �" �f �• , � � „� M � �� j '.• � .\� •i r ��, � � � �,. ;', :.�. j a � �,� � '+ � � � �.:.' !' ' � _ ', ., � . . , r �, p,{� . 9. _ a,; . ..w .T '� • � � y'�:: .. �� h � �� 7s 1f � � ` . � � �� ...,l�1 � ! ' � 1 ^1 + ., . y�. r • r � � � � �� ,,�; "'� � i . . ,,, � � � w �� . � '� ��n �� { ' ' � �� :�y �< � � r ' �� , � � �!'�: ` ��_� ` „' � ri , _ _ x' � �1n-M- ' , it/:�� - '� ."'N 4�`. � •� n `�. j�� '�. r., ��_ !�� . f. � � � �w•�� l � a � q `�� s� w � � ` 1 � a�.akz�.� T V � � , �'� ��. 'T i^ � + �� * ^ ^�*a ,',� ' \ F '�' . ,:�'� �� r r� .. � �'.. �,� � .j� '� , . � y1 �' .jt'�� i x'�' � . . �� . ��' �. � � � l � T � � , � II4...� ,�, �. ' ° 6. � � �y�, ��'�� - � � � � `� *�� ' � O ., y+}^ ,' '� �. � Y ,'` 43 1 •� 1�� > b��'".� � t �t�'��y ., J *�.'... ..t . .. N� �,�' � r .:p � N" � 'M� '.,,, �j � I � � a.4 �� ,�' ' � •��' '�, � �i ;+��"r ``jt i �� '� i�� ''`��: � - y�, k, �.'- � � � . �� '� ' - fi�r,�.�. �',� � i itil � � .� r,._'� � L�e�r 1! �tlL� Level II Flexible Development Application Review _ .. ..�=i .. �i . . . �*?'�- . .. - � . . . . ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 3.4-acre site is located on the west side of the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Kipling Plaza. The subject property is comprised of one parcel with a frontage of approximately 1,071 feet along Mandalay Avenue and 610 feet of frontage along the water. The site is occupied by the Regatta Beach Club, a 349-unit attached dwelling use built, according to Pinellas County Property Appraiser records, in 1962. The subject property is zoned High Density Residential (HDR) District with an underlying Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) category of Residential High ��)• Access to the site is provided by four two-way driveways. Two of the entrances are on the south side of the site, one being the main entrance/ exit on the east side of the site and one on the north side of the site. Surface parking is provided throughout the site east of the building. The building is located on the west side of the side and oriented north to south. A pool area is located along the west side of the building overlooking the Gulf of Mexico. The site enjoys direct access to a narrow beach along Clearwater Beach. The beach area is adjacent to but not part of the subject site. An existing conforming freestanding sign is centrally located in a landscaped area at the main property entrance along the east side of the site. The immediate area is characterized by an established residential neighborhood consisting of one and two-story detached dwellings. Development Proposal: The application is a request to Terminate the Status of Nonconformity for the accessory structures (carports) that are located in front of a principal structure, pursuant to Section 6-109, CDC, as well as a reduction to the front (north, south and east) perimeter landscape buffers from 15 feet to zero feet, a reduction of the required interior parking island area from 150 to 80.15 square feet, a reduction in interior landscape area P T � t � t C � PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION r'`�V i� � , � � �� . �� . ..,d;� � s T� ; .:.,��. � rRp�ECr °"w s. s�� <°_hi aS � � � � ? � t ; � : r.�� r C y ,'-_. = s _ i Y " �: �,��. s- - : i f = � j . : _ , � � : LOCATION MAP �' ,; i --,,'� � `f i{`— ��. _�, �. .�� :-,�: y-_ r Y , � f ; �.. .�.,,,� � � , � ''`s -T�1 w '� � 1 � � ; � � ? �� : �_ .. ��: :; .t. r :``.� � j i f� + � r ' �•' S. • � � .....� - ..- -,�,' . � . : � r -- � � -- . .. j� �.��. �: �� - � -� ., � � � , ,. - _. �� , j� �� — ..;�"� - a �- � � �...�� ` :'� �� - .. . _, _ � ZONING MAP Detached U�•��ellin�s �; � _ " ' {"`'1- � � : _�`_. r — � ` L � J Cfet4�C1�G�CI � U�•, ellings ,�'� � .� 4 �� ` 1 1 � S _�� j � � ,- � . f--�-�—:.J .,- � h � , Uetacl�ed Gt�:ellii�gs �;,. � w {�� EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 FLD2013-09031— Page 1 of 10 ' Vie(� 1'1'alel Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLAxx�rrG&nEVe.r.orMENT p pP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ,; �_ ,�, ,�� °� from 14,981 to 12,425 square feet, an increase in the number of parking spaces in a row from 10 to 21, a reduction in the number of required interior trees and a reduction to the required width of interior landscape islands from eight feet to five feet, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G. The ultimate goal of the applicant, as provided by the submitted application and supporting documents, is to demolish the existing dilapidated carports for the construction of new carports. The carports are an important amenity to the residents, provide vehicles protection from the elements and are screened from view by a lush mature landscaped area along the east side of the north, south and east property lines. As the carports are accessory structures and located in front of the principal structure, the location is non-conforming pursuant to the accessory structure provision found in Section 3-201.B.4., CDC. Pursuant to the non-conforming provisions found in Section 6-102.B., CDC, only normal repair and maintenance of the carports is allowed. Due to the age of the carports dating back to 1960 and the physical state of disrepair, normal repair and maintenance of the carports is not possible and the carports need to be replaced. It is a condition of approval that there will be no expansion of the carports into other areas of the site. Community Development Code ➢ Purpose, Intent and Basic Plannin�; Objectives The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code as follows: Section 1-103.B.1. Allowin� property owners to enhance the value o their propertv through innovative and creative redevelopment. Approval of the application will provide long-term assurance to the property owner that the existing legally constructed carports will be able to be rebuilt, in the event of their destruction due to age, damage inflicted or natural event. The carports are constructed in a semi-circular pattern lining the east property line providing not only protection of vehicles from the elements but also the layout provides an architectural embellishment for the property. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 1-103.B.2. EnsurinQ that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surroundingproperties and wherever practicable promotinQ development and redevelo�nment which will enhance the value ofsurroundin�properties. Surrounding properties are developed with detached dwellings. The existing site used for attached dwellings including the carports has operated in harmony with the neighborhood since the 1960's and has undergone extensive remodeling projects over the years to maintain the property enhancing the value of the neighborhood. The demolition of the carports for the construction of new and improved carports will provide the opportunity to continue with promoting development that enhances the value of the surrounding properties. Approving the application for Termination of Status of Nonconformity with regard to the location of accessory structures, carports, in front of a principal structure should not hinder the redevelopment of adjacent properties nor adversely affect their value. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 1-103.B.3. StrenQthening the citv's economy and increasin� its tax base as a whole. Approving the application will provide a long-term assurance to the property owner that the existing carport amenity may be continue should the carports be damaged or destroyed and will Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 FLD2413-09031— Page 2 of 10 ' v��.Nl t'1' �ll-� Level II Flexible Development Application Review .. �?�s;.,,; . , . � PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION continue to provide an amenity for future condominium owners. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 1-103.D. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of the citv a matter o the highest prioritv and to require that existing and future uses and structures in the citv are attractive and well-maintained to the maximum extent permitted by law. The proposal, as detailed in this report, includes upgrades to the existing landscaping and the replacement of the existing dilapidated carports with carports built in compliance with current Building Codes. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 1-103. E. S. Preserve the natural resources and aesthetic character o� the communit� � both the resident and tourist population consistent with the citv's economic under innings. While there are no natural resources associated with the lot, the proposal will increase the aesthetics of the immediate area through the installation of additional landscaping and new carports. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 2-401.1 Intent of the HDR District and RH FL UP classification. The CDC provides that it is the intent of the HDR District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by state law. The uses and development potential of a parcel of land within the HDR District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property, including any acreage or floor area restrictions set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended from time to time. For those parcels within the HDR District maximum development potential shall be as set forth for each classification of use and location in the approved plan. Section 2.3.3.3.1 of the Countywide Land Use Rules provides that the purpose of the RH FLUP classification is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a highly intensive residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban and intensive qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. The site has been developed with attached dwellings which is a use permitted by the RH FLUP classification. ➢ Development Parameters Landscapin�: The applicant has opted to utilize the Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G and as permitted pursuant to CDC Section 6-109.C.4. The criteria for a Comprehensive Landscape Program are provided below: 1. Architectural theme. a. The landscapin� in a comprehensive landscape pro�am shall be desig.ned as a�art of the architectural theme of the principal buildin_gs proposed or developed on the arcel proposed for development; or b. The desiQn, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment p�osed in the comprehensive landscape prog�am shall be demonstrablv more attractive than Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 FLD2013-09031— Page 3 of 10 � Cleal 1'raLe.t Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT p pP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION � � ,��.�-. landscapin� otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed e or development under the minimum landscape standards. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, a 10-foot perimeter buffer along the east property line, as previously mentioned, is required by the CDC in the HDR District. Due to the location of the carports along the east property line, the applicant is requesting removal of the perimeter buffer requirement. The request is justified as there is a mature landscape buffer on the east side of the north, south and east property lines shielding the view of the carports from the adjacent right-of-way and surrounding properties. Additional plantings are proposed in this area where adequate room exists. Conditions of approval are included that a right-of-way permit is required as well as the applicant enter into an agreement with the City for the maintenance of the landscaping in the City right-of-way. The applicant is also requesting a reduction of the amount of interior landscaping from 14,981 square feet to 12,425 square feet, a reduction of the required interior parking island area from 150 to 80.15 square feet, an increase the number of parking spaces in a row from 10 to 21, a reduction in the number of required interior trees and a reduction to the required width of interior islands from eight to five feet. These reductions are justified as the site lacks area for the addition of interior landscaping and there are not excess off-street parking spaces that can be removed to provide additional interior landscape island areas. The landscape design incorporates plant material that is native and/or naturalized while providing visual interest. Plant species include bottle palm, California fan palm, carpentria palm, foxtail palm, king palm, ligustrum, medjool palm, robellini palm, sago palm, maple, elm, oleander, philodendron and various groundcover. While the site is deficient with regard to perimeter and interior landscaping it exceeds the requirements of the CDC with the provision of landscaping along the east side of the east property line and additional landscape material in the interior landscape islands. All proposed landscaping, as approved, will be required to be installed within one year of approval of this application. 2. Li�hting. An �Lli�htin�proposed as a part of a comprehensive landsca,pe program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. This criterion is not applicable to the subject site because the attached dwelling use is not a business and does not close. However, the applicant will ensure that all lighting meets the requirements of CDC Article 3 Division 13. Outdoor Lighting. 3. Communitv character The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landsca�e program will enhance the community character of the Citv of Clearwater. The additional landscaping proposed for site in combination with the existing landscaping will make the property more attractive thereby enhancing the community character. 4. PropertY values. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landsca�e pro�am will have a beneficial impact on the value o,�property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel �ro�osed for develo ment. Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 FLD2013-09031— Page 4 of 10 � Cl�.ul 1'1'al�t..l Level II Flexibie Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT p PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � Additional landscaping provided along the east side of the east property line as well as within the interior of the site will improve the aesthetics of the site and should have a beneficial impact on surrounding properties. S. Special area or scenic corridor plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program is consistent with anv special area or scenic corridor plan which the Cit-�of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the ap rcel proposed or development is located. This criterion is not applicable to the subject site because the site is not within a special area or scenic corridor plan. Si�nage: The proposal does not include any changes to signage and the existing freestanding sign at the main entrance to the site along the east property line conforms to Code standards. ➢ General A�plicabilitv Criteria Requirements The proposal supports of the General Applicability requirements of this Code as follows: Section 3-914.A.1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bul1� coverage, density and character o�djacent properties in which it is located. The immediate area is characterized by detached dwelling use. The existing site used for attached dwellings including the carports has operated in harmony with the neighborhood since the 1960's. The new carports will be of similar height and in the same location as the existing with no expansion onto other areas of the property. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 3-914.A.2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use o�djacent land and buildin��s or significantl � impair the value thereo,f Surrounding properties are developed with detached dwellings. The existing site used for attached dwellings including the carports has operated in harmony with the neighborhood since the 1960's and has undergone extensive remodeling projects over the years to maintain the property enhancing the value of the neighborhood. The demolition of the carports for the construction of new and improved carports will provide the opportunity to continue with promoting development that enhances the value of the surrounding properties. Approving the application for Termination of Status of Nonconformity with regard to the location of accessory structures, carports, in front of a principal structure should not hinder the redevelopment of adjacent properties nor adversely affect their value. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 3-914.A.3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or sa�ty o� persons residin� or working in the neighborhood. Approval of the application will permit the demolition of existing dilapidated carports for the construction of new Code compliant carports. The existing carports are a safety hazard to the residents of the property due to their structural integrity. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section_ Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 FLD2013-09031— Page 5 of 10 � C�eal f'!'�6�� Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Section 3-914.A. 4. The �roposed development is designed to minimize tra f ac congestion. Approval of the application will likely have no effect negative or otherwise, on traffic congestion. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 3-914.A. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinitv. Surrounding properties are developed with detached dwellings. The existing site used for attached dwellings including the carports has operated in harmony with the neighborhood since the 1960's and has undergone extensive remodeling projects over the years to maintain the property enhancing the value of the neighborhood. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. Section 3-914.A.6. The design o the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactorv and hours o�peration impacts on adjacent properties. Approval of the application will result in the replacement of dilapidated carports and the addition of interior landscaping and landscaping along the east side of the east property line further screening the view of the carports from surrounding properties. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section. ➢ Termination of Status of Nonconformity Criteria Requirements The proposal meets the specific criteria for Termination of Status of Nonconformity pursuant to Section 6-109 of this Code as follows: Perimeter buf ers conformin� to the requirements ofSection 3-1202.D shall be installed. A 10-foot perimeter buffer along the east property line, as previously mentioned, is required by the CDC in the HDR District. Due to the location of the carports along the east property line, the applicant is requesting removal of the perimeter buffer requirement The request is justified as there is a mature landscape buffer on the east side of the north, south and east property lines shielding the view of the carports from the adjacent right-of-way and surrounding properties. Additional plantings are proposed in this area where adequate room exists. Conditions of approval are included that a right-of-way permit is required as well as the applicant enter into an agreement with the City for the maintenance of the landscaping in the City right-of-way. 2. Of -street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-1202.E. Through the previously mentioned Comprehensive Landscape Program application, the applicant is requesting a reduction of the amount of interior landscaping from 14,981 square feet to 12,425 square feet, a reduction of the required interior parking island area from 150 to 80.15 square feet, an increase the number of parking spaces in a row from 10 to 21, a reduction in the number of required interior trees and a reduction to the required width of interior islands from eight to five feet. These reductions are justified as the site lacks area for the addition of interior landscaping and there are not excess off-street parking spaces that can be removed to provide additional interior landscape island areas. The landscape design incorporates plant material that is native and/or naturalized while providing visual interest. Plant species include bottle palm, California fan palm, carpentria Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 FLD2013-09031— Page 6 of 10 '_ Vl�.u� 1't Ltl�,l Levei II Flexible Development Application Review � •^z� �s�-, . . . . . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION palm, foxtail palm, king palm, ligustrum, medjool palm, robellini palm, sago palm, maple, elm, oleander, philodendron and various groundcover. 3. Any nonconformin� signs, outdoor li�htin� or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into con ormitv with this development code. No nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structures or accessory uses are located on the property. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. 4. The comprehensive landscapinQ and comprehensive si�program mav be used to satis the requirement of this section. The applicant has submitted a Comprehensive Landscape Program with this Level II Flexible Development review. The applicant asserts that the proposed landscaping is the maximum practicable given the manner in which the site has been developed. Likewise, the applicant has also committed to installing the submitted landscape plan within one year of approval of this. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. S. The use and structure complies with the �eneral standards for Level One and Level Two �provals set forth in Section 3-914. As explored in detail previously, each General Applicability criterion has been fully and satisfactorily addressed. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section. ➢ Burden of Proof Section 4-206.D.4: Burden of proof. The burden of proo is upon the a�plicant to show b�y substantial competent evidence that he is entitled to the a�proval requested. The applicant has adequately demonstrated through the submittal of substantial competent evidence that the request is entitled to the approval requested as required by CDC Section 4- 206.D.4. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adiacent properties. 1 See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 FLD2013-09031— Page 7 of 10 Consistent I Inconsistent X� X' X' X' X� X� '_ V��.Nl 1'!'�l�l Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplicatio� Review � . . . �'.° t.t;�� . . . . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 6-109 (Termination of Status of Nonconformity): 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(D) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-1202(E). 3. Any nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign program may be used to satisfy the requirement of this section. 5. The use and structure complies with the general standards for Level One and Level Two approvals set forth in Section 3-914. � See analysis in Staff Report Consistent � Inconsistent X1 X1 X1 X1 X1 COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM STANDARDS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Comprehensive Landscape Program as per CDC Section 3-1202.G: 1. Architectural theme. a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is tumed off when the business is closed. 3. Community character. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape progam is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. 1 See analysis in Sta, ff Report Consistent � Inconsistent X1 X� XI XI X1 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of October 3, 2013, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 FLD2013-09031— Page 8 of 10 � C11.R1 1'!'LLll.l Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P pP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � �rr.. :. Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 3.4-acre subject property consists of one parcel with a frontage of approximately 1,071 feet along Mandalay Avenue and 610 feet of frontage along the Gulf of Mexico; 2. The subject property is located within the High Density Residential (HDR) District and the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. The proposal is to Terminate the Status of Nonconformity of the accessory structures (carports) located in front of the principal structure; 4. The subject site is developed with 349 attached dwelling units; 5. There exist carports along the north, south and east property lines, all of which are in a state of disrepair; and 6. There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the application for a Termination of Status of Nonconformity with regard to use is consistent with Section 2.3.3.4.6, Countywide Land Use Rules; 2. That application for a Termination of Status of Nonconformity as requested is consistent with the Intent and General Purposes of the Community Development including Sections 2-501.1, 1-103.B, D and E.S., CDC; 3. That the proposal is currently inconsistent with the Accessory Structure Standards pursuant to Section 3-201.B.4., CDC; 4. That application for a Termination of Status of Nonconfortnity as requested is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Two Approvals as per Section 3-914.A., CDC; 5. That the application is consistent with the requirement for the submittal of substantial competent evidence as per Section 4-206.D.4., CDC; 6. That application for a Termination of Status of Nonconformity as requested is consistent with the criteria as per Section 6-109, CDC. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for accessory structures (carports) located in front of the principal structure pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 6-109; as well as a reduction to the front (north, south and east) perimeter landscape buffers from 15 feet to zero feet, a reduction of the required interior parking island area from 150 to 80.15 square feet, a reduction in the square footage of interior landscaping from 14,981 to 12,425, an increase the number of parking spaces in a row from 10 to 21, a reduction in the number of required interior trees and a reduction to the required width of interior islands from eight to five feet, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G., subject to the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: l. That the location of new carports be restricted to the existing carport footprint and there be no expansion into any other area of the subject property; Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 FLD2013-09031— Page 9 of 10 ' vl�.t�l 1'1'[tLei Level II Flexible Development Application Review u ;�`�� ua, ..o;c� . .. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 2. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the primary building; 3. That issuance of a development permit by the City of Clearwater does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the City for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law; 4. That all other applicable local, state and/or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development; 5. That installation of all landscaping consistent with the approved landscape plan be completed by November 19, 2014; 6. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of- way; 7. That an agreement with the City be entered into for the applicant to be responsible for the maintenance of landscaping located in the public right-of-way along Mandalay Avenue; 8. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150 percent of its rated capacity; and 9. That prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of the Land Resource Department be addressed. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Matt Jackson, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Photographs Community Development Board — November 19, 2013 FLD2013-09031— Page 10 of 10 View looking northwest at the subject property. View looking at a carport in disrepair. Vie�v looking north from the subject property. View looking at a carport in disrepair. View looking at typical interior landscape islands. Looking south from the subject property. 880 Mandalay FLD2013-09031 Matthew Jackson 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727)562-4504 matthew. i ackson(u�mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ❑ Planner III February 2013 to present City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. ❑ Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2011 to February 2013 October 2008 to June 2010 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. ❑ Planner I Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007 Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances. In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead project kick-off ineetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs. Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities. ❑ Manager Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 2004 Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing and special events. ❑ Linguist US Army, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995 Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training. EDUCATION ❑ Master of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 2007 ❑ Bachelor of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Rollins College, 2004 :� � a.r�ater �� ,- Planning & Development Department Flexible Develop�nentApplication Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Resrdential Uses IT IS INCUMgENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLlCAr�ONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NrJ FAX OR DELIVERIES) 70 THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL O F 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMI7TEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICAfION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14COPIES). PVaNS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS Of THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE; $200 APPLICATI�N FEE: $1,205 PROPERTI' OWNER (PER DEED).��,��► �—,�E�LN ��-.L�I� �1�•�`i��J�'%/.NlLyl�! l"�S ��C�/ ��L. L�%I �,N�C ��/IAILINGADDRESS:S�� %�°7/%N(� L�- i�TI ��'�/�il��. LZ.�"�i��I� %�r-", f1� 3.��4_% PHONE NUMBEP,: .�"j�'7 " ��-I��. ...-•�� % �_ —_ — — — EMA.IL: �� NI�"C'�."fY�(.?,�SI��SQL'iYcC C �RC�I��%'C�l'��,i?N• L"G�Y�— - — ACitN I Ut� F(tF'KtJtiv IA I iVt MAILING P,GDP,ESS PHONE NUMBER EMA!L ADGRESS OF SUBJECT PRUPERTY; P��.P,CEL NUMBER(S)�. LEGAL DE�CRIPT!OPd�. .�F ��i ��r��s:s�` � �,�e,�_�►l m�.<i�� _�___ ��' � J Ii!T�/,-±!✓�"l ��! T/ / '��i%�� '7 � � `--��-F�� '�l (.C"_v I _'i �.'1 � N 1G' - :��7 O � --- �_P�-��s��_-��.��z �:v��---�nrnc-��n-: G�� -- '�3 �� __;�1-�`�?�i`� f'7�iN!�C�[..i � _-- �2-�C�1?�AS __Q�- _�I1� � �-1`3_� �L-r�i? i ��I �,_, ;,�,=r �s�i�; ��.J %�Cz�-/�I�__ �'�..'U�>._L.�J.ME-�__ _---_--- -.- . �- ._ _.,_ _ r;i_ ��,i��ii�,�� , �� ,��r_, 1�.� f1'11N1��_ S_1�'l L.�� _��--�%`L?/!�"-_ `'t,�NI�C7,�2m� �_��. � � , ,, � , ,, -,, r;; . r; , e c c,.. 1 C] [2 �� '121=�Yfl � / .5 - � {'?_ C'� �; .5��L2 l.�- - % l�'i,�'� C I L�f /`��-'GG,� _ __ , � , _- -- --- -` � � , _:� od� . � - - — -' , � - , , _ ___ ----- -- _ — -- . --- — _— ---- c F., :, , � - �-=tt u'. - ;r,• __ — -- - - _ 1 _ - -- - ��!riric �� De�ielopment i��,��tr„=.r't iuD �,. ��'i�,lrtle "��✓enue, Ciear,, :'�.��, `l :s: i'�6 Tet: 127 :62 �!.;r, 7t �-w� 65 PaqE= � c`; g 4e�i>:u� �'��'i2 C-(�� / C;CI�f.Y1 i �� T � �� vate� . �� -� ,J, _ _ _ _ , Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFpRMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS fORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPtICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DIS7RICT: FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): SITE AREA: �� ,',��% I sq. `t GROSS FiQOR AREA (tocal square footage of all buildings): Existing sq. ft. Proposed __� sq. ft. Maxirnum f+llowable: d / �q. ft. --�-� �� n � I� � �I `Y acres �RO55 fL00R AREA (total square footage dFVOted to ea�h use, if there will be multlple uses)�, First use sq. ft. Secor�d use: sq. ft. T�.0 , �„ f± �� ,.��. _ _.,. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings dh✓ided by the tota! square footage of entire slte): Exlsting: Proposed Maximum Pllowable BUILDING COVERAGE�f00TPRINT (i�� floor squ�r� footage of ali building;): Exi�ting _ sq. ft _ % of site) PrO��-EO�. `-C1 't- ( _ °'u Uf i`.c� �..1� . r „��rtt�i � f1� �� c t�j GREFiV SPAC� V�ll I'Hlfi�d �/EHICuiI�.R U5� AReI� _, _;; �i � r ��_� r'<ir��_ !�� In,� i�r �_f : t� _- _ � � � . - J.� _ '-�i ' �-�'�� r,��____ ]";�. i[. ' _-.._.._,_V___ �� r . - - � t -f - , , , � i =rG �/� - ''. t ,�0 /� ` C r � ~ r' �r �- y 7 r"7- - -- �,/EHICULAR USE AREA i,��; � -� � �r_�= _I,=� I�-a �r�;�� - F;., _ ' � ��-� � -� -� - ' `- � �-j � . � - � _!_ _ _ _ _ � rr� � �=d ---�f �- - _ � �`� � �--1i� ��tei � -- � a �r��i?g 4 Grlr�n�rr.6r�� DF��a�Tn�c- ��0;� r:yrt!e ��_��ue, CI_��,aater �! ��. ,:, l�. . �62-i4"�"r �=ay 7?7 �S� 1265 p�g� 2 cf 8 �evis_:i u li`9 [ 0 l S IMPERVIOU -`�SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of imper�ious areas db✓ided by the total square footage of entire siCe): Existing. L Proposed: � Maximum P E'mitted: �� %� DENSITY (un is, rooms or beds per acre): Existing: ��' Proposed: � Maximum P E�mitted: OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: Proposed: Minimum Recuired: �� BUILDING HEIGHT: Exlsting: Proposed: Maximum Permitted: WHAT IS TH EESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $,.`��, ��_ ��j • C�� ZONING DISIRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: � �� South: "� East: � �'L West: r`j�j I` STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this � day of representations made in this application are true and �JC,f-��,�„� ._ �f' to me and/orby accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize r�, City representatives to visit and photograph the L]�l.-//�lA� �(��7�/�� , who is personally known has property described in this application. produced �>��.iL' �2. r7 �< <` �-%1� �� as identification. a Signature of prope G��,�1'1.- -� �k�2'C;�' �ner or epresentative Notary public, � My commission e � QERAlD T PANA6ROSSi Notuy PubNc - State M Flwida My Comm. E�Oir�s Se� 2, 2017 Commis�bn i ff li0;i56 rlanning & Development Departrren[, 100 S. IVly�le ,4�renue. CiearNater, �i_ 33756, TeL 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-567_-4E65 Pa ge 3 of 8 Revised 01112 � Planning & Development Department - C�ar�vater Flexible Develo mentA lication p pp 'J Site Plan Submittal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: ❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. 0 Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Rpplication General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. U A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor induding the location of the property, dimensions, aaeage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements induding official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. O If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. ❑ A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect tlrawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following Information U Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. ❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. ❑ Identlfication of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. '� Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located withln a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. ❑ Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. ❑ Location and dimensions of vehi�ular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, wlth proposed point� of access. � Location of all existing and proposed sldewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fiire hydrants and seav✓alls a'� � � ,yi�,� ❑ Location �� on�ite''an��d�'bffsit��s�ormwat ��iiriapa 'e�r�ent fac��lities as v��ell as a r�arr�tiv= de�cribing the prop��ed �", » <. tor-r�v.�t r�co;�tror p�an in`�fu`di�g°c��'IcuG�� i�is 'Ad tiur rl d�t� r�eces<,ary to d� ir�on��r�te c�inplianc� J�ith tr�e Ci*y o; � .`" � �jY , rt i r i�,�r�va*. Sto�t� �r��n ge Desipn'Cn�ena"�i �I � o��/ _�q�i F�r� at r�rne of b�ii�ai��a �or�si:ru t��on perr�it. � r,,t-r,>., a;;;�.� �} �_-:t��,o;, . c E �i�� r�d ;��o�✓i ,on� fci �rre�._il�i� t� �.`�,� coll�r_tl�n- � �, ..� Locatio--� of eff--tr�et Io�ding area, If requ'�red �� S_ctio-� 3�l�Oh '�,� .�� oC��CPYIr rl�rt,Sf-Of'vd�, VJI��', IIIC�ICa�IOn CJf C.r�`�"�.li .� ��.� b. L��.�i. L7�.v�G ��.�!C i , �_ I: IYl? 1._�_1 �Ut- J.I�(j I;"� -�-tl�''''- �.i�iG iJUS �h°I�tE,'"_. �_�� L fi�_r1�G".� O' F'Xl�tir�P� =.^�d p�ONO:;°0 I�l il".__, �`1:�=, � _, �L :i��lc i F5 _,�n _, ,il",-.�u,�� ✓E(ii Y�� , r'_.,'.!�,"'_ � ::'N�'�tIG(15. ''�_ � ��..�I!I�� Ci _;"::CfUY� °_le`./c�ilG�. �f��.. �r��C Lri jT G��, , i12 �J 0�.70�_� �_ IIG CC� I"i�'I,�I;�� „'�CV �JJ Ir� ,.:-a iliatE?��,r�I`_�. P!anning & D�veiopmeni Deperiment. �00 S. iklyrtle Avenue, Cl�a�rat2r, �L 33756. 72!: 727-56?-4567; Fax: 727-562-4365 Page G cf 8 Revis2d 0i! i 2 �7 Typical floor plans, including floor plans for eacn floor of any parklr�g garage. ❑ Demolition plan. � 0 Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. ❑ If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (exduding those standards where the difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidellnes for further information. ❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identlfying those trees proposed to be removed, if any. ❑ A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff. ❑ A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more of the following conditions: ■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable levels; or � The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or ■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other �mknown factors. ❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the princlpal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following informatlon, it not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approvai: U Location, size, description, speciflcations and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. ❑ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line. ❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. ❑ Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transforir�ers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storrn drains, seawalls, utility easemen�;, treatm�nt of all ground surfaces, ar�d any other feature; that may influenr_e the proposed landscap�. � Location of parking areas and o.her vehlcular u�e areas, �u�cluding parking spaces, r_irculation aisles, .ini:r�rioi landscopu Island; and curbing. , •. �• � ` �� dlr�d�'e �lriC� f2tECitIGr1 �!"EaS, IIIC�Udlil� Wc�ES, ; IG�� ;IOp�S �f1G� �?OrtOr�.`1 Fi2V?ti01lS. ❑ Delineati�n a��d dime�slons of all required per�meter landscap?d burfer; incf�iding �ighttri�ngles, if any. Pianninc & Deveiopment Department, 100 S. Miyrtle .�verue, Clear�vater, FL 33756, �(el: 727-502-4567; Fax: 72'7-562-4866 P�ye 5 of 8 �evised 01/12 } � r�ater Planning & Development Department Iea F _ lexible Development Applicatlon General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPlIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. �i'� � i?%�?D��s �� c��R-�L�� ; S' r'�-� Tc� l`��-'(.e�c' � i�i E�X� s�/N C-� �`7�1�f' �jt� �-L ��/ �� i C i E� j� r��i��'�S �� i�rH ni�J ,� � C�%1 i�i C 1� N�T� f°J�p�iE�9 i v.��Si �rl v�� N�i G��r� 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and bulldings or significantly impair the value thereof. ��1 n i t� C N� w c� � 1Z�� ,t �� e�� "�� .�i i�"� I t�i i�� C X!�} C—r � im � i�c:� C i� ,� I v jU v� t TH Y� �.-� j�! E�� -1 ��5 7 N j�`j" �� r � L '�-; �iA �N�T� �`� i u YY1 � i C.I-� �"l-t'� �i.,� o �bi hl C-� �i� I� �t�" Ut ��i � C� ��t� 3. The proposed development wlil not advFrsely affecc the health or safety or persons residing or working In the neighborhood o`the proposed use. �1� �'i"k+� S t"�2��r ►� �E�� t-r ' �i��TS i;�a � �:� i�t�,�� Nt�. ��v�-'I2�t: �-'1�FEc° "rS L�N i I�E N�Lt'H_ �1Z .��i11 ui� ��/�i S '�t�i`�i��—o�Z. v�o�.K.i�vf� iN 7H�� NE�f��'1fv�A. _ The proposed development is designed to minlrnize traffic congestion. �� f-►� �'�2 b��s�� `1�.i� C i�. �2 � i�.; i �-L �..jp. i��-r-C �'. �_ i�_. �i- J� - ��___� i N'� �"�'�-�l ilV_� i�.j'AV — — —T 5 The proposed development is cons�stent with the community character of the imr��ediate vicinity of �he parcel proposed for development � - — — — - - - ' -- --� �- -- , , / . 'f �Ef� � - !� G��oS �-� —C.�1 �0�2 i S .__1��_ ��_D _ !�_�-%�-� c"L, � ��T11! � -- �� l,� t: �.t�%'�--� U-�__��! CL�_1�: i_�i�%��>� �.�-- �ti`_!__iJ� L�11� -=�i-� .��'..� C`��/ j � ., � , G� �N_�� __ i _� —'��_t:. S I G-�N _ t��2 - �-1 �1 C �11�_ _ _ ----- _ _- --_— __ __ __ - T�i�_ � i�r, �� l".- Pi��. �d dc'JPIo.� �� nii� ,-ii7� dd��/F,r �f�c �, in�_'��u � f; �� ual, aCO�i ��-ic �,r�r{ _,��?Ct�.r� _r,d "l��cr'; _ n��F.r .� , �� p ��,<, �� rrij2r� �r a �� 'iF > '�. C � 7 ��: _�L�'L� . � ['�_ 1��fi� �� t2� � l��_ _,� __/�c.�t1� l _-- � �, `�'1 tc` i. -�-- _ �`3 LL____--- — �='-E=.�`�'i_!1_2�f? _.�C"Lti;___�C��>�:.5 _ ��;f-fLC/a _ c.�.%.� t-�_ ��1t E _ =if/t ---Siti�t�c�Tc.�.-�'� ___i�'1�� rL��*_1� r�lt�_:r�c: (h4_C�__.t��cc,� ei- LcJ�c_C._�c-_�i�c,�pc��f -� ��iN�i %�' -`li�E"__ �'��ti(� {�-�l.al�llall�lE� f�/2i1l�t�.jZ. I / �=�5' I°ianning � Develo�ment pepar[m�nt, !00 S. �ryrtle Avenue, Clea��ater; FL 337b6, Te!�. 727-56;i.-�?56?�, =ax: 727-56Z-�dS65 F2ye 7 0; 8 �L'YISBti i;1112 �� Cl arwater ,� e Planning & Development Department Flexible Develapment Application Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT fuil names: ��E,�13�% f4 ��}C'H C� L L�/� � G?/VI�t��'YI oe�I/G�I�'2 �} :�S�L�CIl��d/�� ,//�1C. 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: �� N/� L%� �� 'L`�iU l.� != C' �. � 19�r�.- �'3%C-� �L =� �'7( 0'-7 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): 'i � �� rn � �•i � ��= s T�a �� r��= �-�� e�v�o,�� i ��.2i� ��-r2+-� 2-rS C�1cr- �ss�,� .� i iZ��c-r � r� �� That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: l�� U ��!`I/-') L-��"c[�.S.S 1 ��%Z 1�,��►'e'- %�/ ��141`!�l F�r � as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5 That this affidavit has been executed to Induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above descrioed property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes Clty representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/wel; the undersi�ned authority, hereby certify that the foregoin� is true and correct. n � , ,%-' (`i , r, r �/�.�..�G��,'�L Prope�ty own� Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE QF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE �J1F THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LP,WS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, UN THIS _� DAY OF C� '`�- � _ _ , -�, (� I � PERSONALLY APPEAPED � ��L��__��!��._�___ ____ _ _V�1H0 HHVI��dG BEEN FiP.ST DULY SWORN � GEPOS� D AND �AYS THAT HE/SHE Fi�LLY U�JI�EP,SI �,P�1DS THE C!�NTENT� Or I H� AFFIDAVI I THAT HFrSHF 51GNEG ; rdo ar; Se� �� 3rnp �------- ��9y ��r��iss�on Exps Planning � Deveioprnent Deo�rtmFnt. t00 S. Myrtle A.v�r�ue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727 Page 3 of 8 GERAID T PANAGROSSI comm. Expfres Sep 2, p01 � Commission � FF 50556 6T, Fax: 727-56T�d�o.' Revised 01/'i2 �; Planning & Development Department y�l��r Flexible Deveio rrient Application ea p �- Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE fLEXIBI�ITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PERTHIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (U5E SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). �� i I-i� �X i S�o N� i�'�iZ. i�rn� TL�i2 �� r��-� i� i � S i�i i�� ' � w i��. r� �.vf�� , l7 SL: C i� U1�I "� i.� 0".� �C � W� �;�-?t� i 5 r��>t� �'_ i�� S��} ZI�'l �� i�t-�3 -1" r�r?�-L J S� i��--- � C� i4 � �f-l'� �� v� �! �'(,�l S i�� 1�"�' �- 't� tii �� t 7� i�J L�� i I�i �/'�/�� S�,H7�-��c i,�?�s �� i �� f�,E= e�-i _ C c,�r.�f-,— z. ''v�i E 1� 1 � L F'->"e� i-� �y ni C� SN'�3'1)t:� `r"'%z-� 5 iZo� �_ ��.�2i� ��iE� �`��n /'f �/�J �� I'7�1L`V 1 N C�a SU-'v G='�'-� L�Y11 xl 1�L, t��-1 L i'1�� `i C7 ��C l,.t�C �"�� 1� (>�% �i�'L>��727� 'ic� o�� i � ��r�nse �� .��r�� tii �-- � �c�� Ct� � 3. i� L U�' / c-L. i��- SC� 't��c� F� i�i�l hlE� Si,�/'YJ� C.�C..��! NI�C=� S�i-�'72�Z C�� C�/�l i�-tf". i �;12 ► 1'Y� ;��i�— `T Co i� X�/� %O %f-r`� �3c�fFi� -i� �-t%�t � =ti�� .ci � N'��rr�c' �i;�� N Si��-'� C� 5 - �' ^ �� ' � �!-��`I`7" /��x=�� i , �_ a i_�r�� ,�-1-�h�L� l�t� �1��f�C�tr- C>C>�/�/� C'�,N�t�%Z�"�'J l v i�-fL i�rv�EL�/�i7��".N:% C��l�r e,tic /''�r- f7,,��'�%/?��//�e'C� `;��..1NC-��1`r � ��l�" ("'w7Ti� i� Cl�C't%� sS�i2�> ST,?[iC�iuiz� l i o ��_ . 5. _.___. .: jz .; � [�oe !F 'hy. . N^ t. . �r 11'� %fuf §� y�(�iM ;. r� _ ___...__— �- .A r f :.,�y —s' ._ '� _ .. �. � t µ a�,O `� Planning & evelopmPnt �epartmen , 0 �. yrt e Avenu<:. Clear.�rater, F�_ �3756, TeL (27-562-u,567; �ax: 717-562-4865 Page 7 oi 8 R��sised G1/12 � �:--, � �� r�vater ��w.,�� °�� '�� Pianning & Development Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application 1T IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLlCANT TQ SUBMIT Cf3MPLETE AND CQRRECT iM1tFC7RMATfON. ANY MlSIEADIiVG, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR iNCORRECT IIVFORMATION MAY INVALI�ATE YOUR APPLICATION. Ait APPLI'CATIONS ARE TfJ BE F[LIEQ OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMl7TED IN PERSON tN0 �AX OR DEUVERIESj TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SY (UOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEAaCINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 C4MPLETE SETS QF PLANS AND APPL1CATtQN MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AM1tD 10 COPIES) AS KE{}UtRED WITNIN AR� TO E3E 5UBMITTEt7 FOR REVI�W BY TME pEVEI.f1PMEP�T REVIEVII COtVIMI'CfEE. SUBSEQUENT 5UBMlTCAI. F'{)R TME CQMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARQ, IF NECESSRRY, Wlt! REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APFLICATIQN MATERtAL5 (1 ORtGtNAL AIVD 14 COPIES). P�ANS AA1D APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE CQlLA7€D, STQPLED A1U[7 FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING TFiIS APPLICATION, AGREES TQ COMPLY WITH A!L APPLICABLE REQU[RfMENTS OF THE COMMtJNITY DEVEIOPMENT CODE. PROFfRTY OWNER (PER DEED�: MAILING ADDRE55: PHONE NUMBER; E:MAiI.: A6ENT QR REPRESENTATIVE: MAILING AI�C?RESS: PHQf4E NtJMBER: �_� ��ML� 1� _l�?%�,�1�'_�--(? c,L�1 C�,,,�,��.I�_ �[?��.!�1 d.t r,,�'L..!`?�..�:.�?G�� i.Q�,___�.�i.C� 3�S1.� 1"�'!I-iti 9>Y-�C,YI. ��d_I.,��,1`�'��--`�t��; i'�� 3:3��7L�a °7 'f �''T ° � �-I I.i� ° `�""1 t�i� � I�l� l`I %d� E� � G� : �a, i � (Z¢=; ��L�1..�1,�2 C � : ,��'L7��r',: �. `/ /7'1 �i/%�T. ��i�7 EM�II: ��N 1�.('�..�.. .�1.�`'��._I_..�..12.��S4ii,l.-.RC:_�..._��.7 i�--�s�a.r_i` _r/_`'!r..._�"L�� ...................... �7� ^7 ar�t�r�ESS �F sus�ECT Pr��p��rv: ��.. l�'I�i�iA�!�1�! �/.. f9�v�.�.u..�E" __L' LG�1?�`vr.�� , f.:_:C.. ...,33`7�a"7 L)ESCRIPTfON OF REtZUEST' i�'�:'E i�l-� 'F2�f:��,,f � S%//�/G /`i l��.I�G�'L %/AL`� /.N %/�� J`/U/l'!/�L=72 C�� pecif'rcally rdentify the reyuest �� Ti��.� 2�.C�{,�12�b t:'�f�/�SE� (�� f%i42JE� %S� 1�'19Li1�1 � {inclu�te oN rPquested eod� fl�xibility; e.g., redvction in rec�uired ��umber of R"1��...i��..%�1.�1G/ .�.......�./.l�''�..._i!�.%�il�/7S...�/��....-�.��''L!l.�S� ...�/_�.. ._�/��-�._....... porkrrrg s��ar.�:s, heigt�f; setharks, tat /�1"�=C'_Z�.i�O. ..%`�__.��.��''—..,G.�,.._. �?��._. �''��'��._.!�� _./-�� /�%�-'�. lV/�L-..,/V�-GLl _ _. size, lot widtii, s�ecifac use, etc.J: ��-fs�.A,� ��C� �(� �7��' .��/'i,��--�>�( / STATE OF FLORIDR, COUNTY OF PINElLAS i, ehe un�ersi�ned, acknowl�d�e that a!1 SU✓orrt to ar�d subscribed before rrie this _� c�ay �f represEntations made ir� tf�is �pp(icatiQn are true and .-�--, --q accur�aYe to the best of my kr�ov�rlecl�e and authorize ��! 1�._��%�_ __ �__:.�(;�+��..__. eo rrle andjor by City representatives to visit and phat�graph the L�'',7�L1,� }� 1� (�� /°-� %`-/ __, v��hp is personally known has property clescribed ir� this application. Signature of property ow,�r or rep�es�ntative , praducec� / �. � j, � j L-.I (' ' ____ Natary public, My comrnission as ident€ficaCior7. ALD T PANA6ROSS! Public - State of Florida Ptanning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtte Avenue, Clearwater, F �1 •�7��;� Page 1 ot2 ��lFp�FI�A� Commission �� vat�r � �� °`�"�""� "��.,�"°�"°�"°� '"°."� � e�� ` .,._�°"`�.��"^e,�,�';«';„,,� i'�anning & ��v�lc��ment I3epartment Comprehensive Landscaping Application Flexibilitv Criteria PRQViD£ CQMPLETE R�SPONSES TO EACH OF THE FIVE (5j FLEXIBIItTY CRITERIA EXPLAINING NQW, IN DETA[1., THE CRITERIQN IS BEING COMPLtED WITH Pf R THIS COMPREHENSIUE LAIVC3SCAPING PROPOSAL. 1. Architectiaral Theme: a. The landscaping in a Cam}�rehensive Landsca�ing program shall be designed as a part of the architECtural tfieme of the principal buildin�s propased or developed on the parcel propnsed for thP deveioprnent. OR #�. The design, c:haracter, Eacation andJor materials af che (anclscape treatrnerit �rop�sed in the Con�pretaer�sive Landscaping program shall be demc�nstrably mare attrac�iv� than landscapin� othPrwise permitked on the parce! prapased for c3evelopment under t11e minimum fandscape standards. �N.E.... ��c�P��,`...........�f t�.�.G�l.i �. Z/. .... lft�-.� . /��.......i��..T��,,, . C�-_._.._.�..i �... .. %?/`t �.-�.. % �k-��d..� 5.....�'� i i/� 0�_ `��+ �C � �!�t.��_ ��.�. /� � �tai�GS��_%a .� h,� .�i L��.� _.�_'��-�_- 1 ��is._..........�iN.l�.........,�'��E........�_�:1=�/�/hC"/_"=..._._..�.�._.��....% ......._.�%.%1�f_f_,.._L.:_Gt..,�-L�-'.t_.�'! .................�°_.(�%b..f�._��_........... 2_ trghting. Any iightin� proposed as a parz of a Comprehensiv� landsca�irig prograrn is autarriatically cor�firolied so that the iightin�; is t�umcaci oFf wh�n th� business is cicised. 1�% E 1�� /-�l��f-'U �/%UE� �lC� �yF�.c� ��l C�H i/N� l i i S %-G L�Xi �/�/E� .� L%6i� i i�`/�� I�'�I��' �' � 1�� l�t� DC•t l� t= E= ��[��l �N l� 1 S l'�ON T/��Ll � i`� �3� f L✓C-T.�-% SG i� rS��'S '� N�-r i i� l'��1 S�'�� t7N �l�i/� bi�i � i o��i ��-1-�/ � 3. Communiry Chc�racter. The laridscap� treatm�nt �ro�nsed in the Compreii�nsive Candscape Pragram will enhance the carrirnunity ch��rar.ter of thE� City of (:leartivater. i l�l"� � X �S'T/�4'L'� 1 �? i�.!'l� S � J�S�.��i � �L /�ui�-u' S �n�/�/�/��i � - � � 1�,� �, ��-� %`/ i� l�ll� i I�C C� i�� 2 Nc' i� bF %N ��1��1 � l�i l� f-h�l � i.�V � i� NC-�� " i�'_� 5 7�-�-C L' N?�'-�l c" i c--� �� C�r �t i.,� � L L vM"L l{ l'� �n i/�f1 x sl't2'� �4. f'roperty Va(ues. �I�he landscape tr�atr7ier�f pro��osec� in the Cornpreher�sive L�ndsca�ing �arc7grarn wsifl have a b�neficial im�acz on t�ie value of the �roperty in the iminediat:e vicinity of the parcei Faropose�! for r�euefoprnent. `{ES__iNC GX_I.�_c�/�l_C L1�ivI�SC'�� :S__.�1.��v,�--/S 1_14C'P��:u.�_ 1�LZ0/��-�7y � � �,_v__�� __ g�tiT __ � 1 f+ Nar_��_!'??� �� __��.s� _ �� _s�-`��--�-�-_ i nj � �-L (2/��l !' �1 �c'�H�ir� �/�rC� F��7 �� '��`' � /��-� i � " .�� : ' __ 5. 5�ecial Ar�ev �r Sc�nic Cvir�idor Plarfi. Tk�e lan��tsc_ap� treatrnent prUposed in tkie Corr�prel�ensive t�ndscape Pro�rarn is c�nsiszent with any s�ecial area or scenic corridor plari which the City of C.learwater has preparEd ancl adopt�r� fc�r tt�e area in v�f�iich thc� p��r�cHl �.�rc�pc�sc=d fc�r ��ve�l<aprri<sxr�t: is Ic�r:��t�eE�. 1 f-l�--r� � t`� N t� S�� C� I,qL �-�---�-� U� �S'C � �/� �C L` �'�--� i�� }�L� �.! �� 7`f� l%/ bY C'C t� Gv,� ��2 �- l�� %�IS L��'�i �� Pfanning &�evelopment Department, 10Q S. Myrtle Avenue, Ctearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-5&2-d865 Page 2 of 2 Revised 01192 . ' J .li:�� , �'.� � I Ir�. I� : _' I � � 9 � . t 'I l ' ' T�Y �__ —"_'__ _._ i I 1._lf. A'iA ?'GIS l5'!I: i.ti:5�� GM:3" `_�L:': 4G : �G Glfi StiG:SiUXIO iiY' _ifJVi C�1, 1'.i_!t ?:_ ��.�SL v.�LJ'i�.:I;G� .^.c�._" L L L I l GJ��'/ I � ��id�Tl� �F9� . l ii.l _ ��v�d��`� _,._m _�.. _ I I _ � r� � � _ � (. I . J I F— ' � Z � � � I I J I \ A �• � �� '' ^ � � M , ,+1►*:4U;�rI '�'a'�li:�+�►� ^ i ti �1`� 7 . ��R� ```. , ' , � `. . �,`\4 �j•f ; ' ♦ ...: � /# -:1� r��, � . , «: ... e�r ; � J► ��.i � � �. ,J � • �� ' �I Pi►+ �!► , �` � � .� ��- �:r +'J� +�`� f�': Y� . � � ��'.. �� , � + � . . . . . . �. � � •ar. �'. �- . t �y.. � �. � d dl {�,i::;��es �,:: p�t -•��q. z�w ^ � rJ� �. ., � � ,� . .. +.' � �` ww w. : r ' . ., ` a; �' � �� , �.. , .. ��or � ''' "'_ ., , ��, ° . " .� s :r" . � . � i. _ � — I� �r , ;�, � � � � � � : a� -. �niilw/' . ..,- • � � �� = ; . i �.• � ,,; . , , � { :f ` • �� . �� .� � � ��; t��} i.Ir.+�-. : � � : �,� ,:�,'�� : . . � � � �� 0 -- — ---- __ __ _----- - ------_ .— - - --- — --- _ --- . � __ _ �.[:�.�.1(`11 J�t1. A��.. �� 1�� . .. � . �L'I�(7l�i �'I'�7�`�i.iE'' 29 �TI� It14I3t�� TS R�'T. �'g+iffi�� I'Y; I�S{C� norES: . .. . - . -. . - � . .- - . . � � " - � . � _. � � � . . ._ � � � .� t. Remove NI carpoii siruciures In resiricte.:! -�-`--�-- -� -_. :�' -;.er-i.emctt _ � � � . � - � � .. .. oreo � �— - �_' �1 ' �_ , � � - � � � - -� _ � 2. Slructure to indude but no limiled lo �oaliny, ' vvv�� s�� . � �'� 1- �. - "" - - �. - slruclurol roo( componenis, a� A �olumn;. ��tli�Y�_ �� , . 3. All Debris confined to temparery demolition �� t� �t '��ti� � t - � . BBAFiIK' SCALE areo. � . �- -� � - � � � `� � _ `� - � � � � 4. NI Debris removed frorn ;ife beforc � . . . ... - � ' jA � t - ti . ' � � completion. � . . . �p. . ' r 1 ;��' - i � �- - ' S. Debris confainers in reslricied area anly. . .� . �t a . �, .�.. � °°a' �" - . � . —' _ �'�'-P,: � � �: �.,.�, � , � ,.Q . � . � �, ; ��_ �� 'j�� ,`LJ H :� � - . t .� � � � ;Y � - - - . � . . � � � � � � t - . . .� � � .. � . � u ' Restricted Fedeslrion nnd - �� . 1 .` . � . . -` �j ; t� . � _ �r� � �E . � Vehicular access o ' � . i N - . y , � � . . � �-7 � .� � � � .Z aew� � 1 � � . a�o .1 � �+ . �. . TaiB�11 � - . j - - i _ . - v � �' � �s � ��- NY� - . . . � � � J .i w - � ,. � _ !$ . . - _ , .._ � ra��urr x.� � -� �, � � ,: �o� ' - � . . O i �a ,� . . � - xw a-� � ...- -°T � ,., --� . . . �q ��n. �� . .. . - . � . - . � � -:.'0°�+'nu�i4�� . : . . . -� �_ . . j . _ . _ . � fDB. a+ N#ewo lnref 4�R � .' � . � 40t'�,� OtD4 7 f - . - . . •�" � . _ . _ .. . . # r � � �c �.n �r . � . ' . i . _ . � . -- . � � • . . .. �. -.� �-. iy. •. .. • . �lR - , �. n�-a�_�c ' : V�i/ � ��.,a�J � ..�;_,�.,� ...-.w-a..� . ..� ,�...�,.: .�_.._._�4__.__..�..� -- . � z � ,� �� DEMOLITIDN PLAN _ - I I _ __ ---- _ ___-1 1 . ___ .— — N.�:� r-i = � ' � ��_ � -� ' � <<� � �� m� - � �,- n n 2 � � o c - ��cnn � � � � i .- e� �, ;� ""�` NTS =,.t� ; -��_ - _ _ .* _ � � � „ � � .. �_ :1�'•+� :�.! . . . •;_ :.R • • ,+-��• :�� c,• . ; ' t i:l ;�. �;��' � R - �iiii'�:� ":.6 �:�C'r.a�' � ...w - ,.Y' .R z � �� • �•O� . •� � -��,.��1 � - , � � �� 1 � �"'-• : - .. ■ y �ir ��j� 01�'�' r "•�� d� !��,,,;��,��e,��, - � �-- � I � 1� �:� : �'�/,,i,i�,��". � I a = x..�. ,�-,Jf��.� ' r � w ��i�f'a r � � , + � 'i ��r I . �' � �� ''' � �� I • 'r, • �_ �� r = -� � �� !53 �.�.t�� Ii: tt•�s ai :�i �. � � \ � . ��IM, . GC i.'...e w � —+ _ ,r1' i w r:ya a �, � ..•� .. .., � y �� •� � I � ��'r , � �* � � „ ' . ,M . . _ • �, ,� I • V. � !.� •'17'r F"� ,. T ,` �' � � �� 1� � f's�f � �� i �`:�C.� � -, . * ?�'. s .�b 'i r � _ - �4 • i • •i � � • a • • a � . • • '`.,� � ____ _ _ _ � � NorES �I L Remove All corport slrudures - restncted I� - _ area � — _ I i �, 2 Structure lo include bul no limited lo roo(ing, � — structural roof componenls, and olumnti. I I 3. All Debris confined ta lemparai� aemol�lion = orca �� 4. All De6ri5 removed from site b�lore � completion. - --- --- 5. Debris containers m restncled area enly. I I� �Reslricted Pedestrian onA Vehicular access � • li c -; F i ,; �r ` ��; r � � �2 - u? u_ i- I L C/l {'; (1 L, . i � L C7 i t i1_ ,_ i` o� � � q _ ,,, ,: � k � � �_ —__ " _' i �� enr�- —U�/?7/;?C)1:j II Yf:FI,F. Nr� —_— I .— - 1 ��,��T � oF .--- REGATTA BEACH CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. 880 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER, FL 33767 727-446-3700 October 3, 2013 Case Number: FLD2013-09031 — 880 MANDALAY AVE The following are the answers to the Development Review Committee's comments: Fire Review 1. We are replacing the existing carports and rebuilding in the exact same location as they currently stand. We are not increasing the height or width of the structure. There will be no encroachment on the ingress or egress of emergency vehicles. 2. Affordable Aluminum Construction Inc, License number C3479. The contractor is required to meet all NFPA 241 requirements. 3. We will not require a Hotwork permit; those materials will not be used for this new structure. Land Resource Review 1. None of the proposed tree locations will become problematic for existing security lights and signage in the parking lot. 2. A very limited amount of asphalt will be removed to install the new foundation that is required in the new code. 3. The contractor, Affordable Aluminum will apply for a Clearing and Grubbing permit. Planninq Review 1. — 4. Changes have been made on the application 5. Regatta Beach Club has no agreement with the City of Clearwater to maintain the landscaping in the City right of way on the street side of the carports, but we have maintained the landscaping in this location and will continue to do so. 6. Revisions have been made to the landscape plans to add shrubs to the interior landscape islands. Some of the islands are very narrow and we are unable to add additional shrubs, but we will add more shrubs to a farger island that will make up for those narrower islands. 7. We have made the revision to the plans to show that we will add shade trees to the two of the three islands that do not have a tree, the third island is too small for a tree but we have added shrubs to that island along with several other islands and we will be adding an additional shade tree to a larger island to make up for the smaller island. Respectfully submitted, Jerry Panagrossi, LCAM Property Manager � ��Lrr>� r .,,��s�A`��',�� CITY OF CLEARWATER ic,'.�I;,�A �: P�.a:v_v�vr&D�,v��orr,is�n D�r�1�,rrE�r e� `r ��Q� POS'I` �rFICE BOX lf%4�, C(.�Altu�i�'CEIt, FLORIDA 3;�758-�}%fg �9�� _,��pQ�� tt.�vtc.ienL Sr:iz�lc�� B�riinuvr, 100 Sao�rx �t�irrc� A�-��ot; Ct.�n[t�n�reii. F�.oaina 337'i6 '��AT ERy,��' TL��Ptio:v� (72%7 �62-45G % Fax (72?.) �62-45'6 9:45 AM Case number: FLD2013-09031 -- 880 MANDALAY AVE Owner(s): Regatta Beach Club Condo Assn Inc 880 Mandalay Ave Clearwater, FL 33767-1242 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Jerry Panagrossi 880 Mandalay Ave Clearwater, FL 33767 PHONE: 7274463700, Fax: No fax, Email: Jpanagrossi@resourcepropertymgmt.Com Representative: Jerry Panagrossi 880 Mandalay Ave Clearwater, FL 33767 PHONE: 7274463700, Fax: No fax, Email: Jpanagrossi@resourcepropertymgmt.Com Location: 3.4 acres located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue directly west of the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Kipling Plaza. Atlas Page: 238A Zoning District: High Density Residential Request: Flexible Development application to (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for accessory structures (carports) location in front of a principal structure pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 6-109; (2) a reduction to the front (north, south and east) perimeter landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet, reduction of the required interior parking island area from 150 to 80.15 feet, reduction in the square feet of interior landscaping from 14,981 to 12,425, increase the number of parking spaces in a row from 10 to 21, reduction in the number of required interior trees from 100 to 20, a reduction to the required width of interior islands from eight to five feet, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Presenter: Matthew Jackson, Planner III 9/30/2013 °�QLrAI, ��fPLQ1'D1�N'1' r1��U t�l'1'IRAiA'TI�'E i1Cl'ION �Si�IPLOYER° DRC_Comments The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review General Note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Review General Note(s): 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), F.A.C. 62-621(2). 3. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Fiorida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the appiicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. Fire Review 1) Must meet the requirements of NFPA-1, 2009 edition (Florida) Chapter 18 Chapter 18 Fire Department Access and Water Supply 18.2.3.4 Specifications. 18.2.3.4.1 Dimensions.18.2.3.4.1.2 Fire department access roads shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 ft 6 in. (4.1 m). .Please note that the Clearwater Fire Department requires that the vertical clearance of 14 feet and should any additional repairs be made this dimension SHALL be met. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. 9/30/2013 2) Must meet the requirements of NFPA 241 Standard for Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations 2004 Edition Should any additional work be conducted on the existing carports. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. 3) Please note that should any additional work be conducted on the existing carports, The Division of Fire Prevention Services under the City Ordinance and NFPA-1, 2009 edition (Florida) requires a Hotwork Permit and Inspection PRIOR to commencement of work> ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. "Ec1t��t EN�rLO��1�r�r �L�n Art�xMn�r�� .crlor� En�nioY�a" DRC Comments Land Resource Review Land Resource Review: Prior toBuilding Permit: 1. Identify if any of the proposed tree locations will become problematic for existing security lights and signage in the parking lot. 2. Clarify if any asphait will be removed. Depending on the response to this comment more conditions could apply at time of building permit. 3. You will be required to apply for a Clearing and Grubbing permit. General Notes: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. Planning Review 1. On page two of the application, revise the future land use plan designation to read RH, not attached dwellings - carports. Planning Review 2. On page three of the application, provide the number of existing dwelling units. Planning Review 3. Revise the answer to criterion number one on page six of the application to discuss only that the proposed carports are to replace the existing structuraliy deficient carports with no significant changes to design or height. Planning Review 4. Revise the answer to criterion number five on page six of the application to be the same as criterion number one. Planning Review 5. It is expected that there is an agreement with the City for the property owner to be responsible for maintaining the landscaping in the City right-of- way on the street side of the carports. Please provide said agreement if it exists. Planning Review 6. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1, interior landscape islands are to have 50 percent shrub coverage. Revise the landscape plans as such. Planning Review 7. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1, one tree is required per landscape island. Revise the plans as such as there are three landscape islands that do not have a tree. Stormwater Review General Comments 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application Traffic Eng Review Generai Note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 9/30/2013 °�QC41L �NIl'LOI'il4EA''P A.nD L�r1'IR,%fA7T�'E i�CI'ION EMPLOYER�� DRC Comments REGATTA BEACH CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC 880 MANDALAY AVENUE CLEARWATER, FL 33767 727-446-3700 September 11, 2013 RE: FLD2013-09031 — 880 MANDALAY AVE — Letter of Incompleteness Dear Matthew Jackson: The following are the answers to your letter of incompleteness sent to us on September 4, 2013. On page three of the FLD application, provide the number of existing and proposed off- street parking spaces. a. The existing parking spaces are as follows we have 231 open parking spaces, 84 carports, 24 underground parking spaces, and 10 handicap spaces for a total of 349 spaces. We are not proposing to add or subtract any parking spaces; there will be no changes to the off street parking areas. 2. Provide the widths of all parking islands. a. The widths of all parking islands are provided on the attached blueprint. 3. Provide the areas of each of the parking islands. a. The areas of each parking island are also provided on the attached blueprint. 4. As one of the criteria for the application is to bring non-conforming signs into compliance, provide a dimensioned drawing or photograph of the sign. a. We have attached a photograph of the front sign for Regatta Beach Club. One of the criteria for the application is that the off-street parking area shall be improved to meet CDC Section 3-1202.E. As such, meet the aforementioned Code requirements or include the deviations in the description of request in the submitted Comprehensive Landscape Program. a. 95% of our parking islands more than comply with the 150 sq. ft. minimum. We have a total of 28 parking islands that total 150,469.85 sq. ft. which should be sufficient to meet the CDC Section 3-1202.E. of the Comprehensive Landscape Program. We are asking for a deviation of the Comprehensive Landscape Program due to Regatta Beach Club being and existing building that was built in 1962. We currently have 215 total palm trees with at least five (5) different species of palms. We are proposing adding ten (10) shade trees to the property seven (7) of those trees wili be added to the parking islands to include both Red Maples and Florida Elms to help meet the Comprehensive Landscape Program. Respectfully submitted, a .d.�-�°`�A ��-:,:�:�"�� J�'r"�--�-b�nagrossi, Property Manager Jessica Benedict, Assistant Property Manager � �r�ru�. ,��<�s�A`°`„`�'%=_ �ITY OF CLEARWATER a�' �� : � �,', ,�'i'` P��vtvc & Dsv�LO�>ti��°r D�t�aR»t�:��r `�.�J��+ Pc�st Orric:� Bo� 4?43, Ci�a�t��ai�a, �iax�na 33; 58-4'48 �� OQ�' ML«iciPnc Sri,�-�c�s I3�n�n�c,, 100 Socrx Ni�a« �1�-r��; C�.�.�tz�n�i�iz, Fc�izm� 33776 'oqjER,,,r� T��rriio��: (?2;> 562-�56i r.�x c�2?> SC2-4867 September 4, 2013 Jerry Panagrossi VIA FAX: Resource Property Management 880 Mandalay Ave Clearwater. FL 33767 RE: FLD2013-09031 -- 880 MANDALAY AVE-- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Jerry Panagrossi: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2013-09031. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the foilowing comments. 1. On page three of the FLD application, provide the number of existing and proposed off-street parking spaces. 2. Provide the widths of ali parking islands. 3. Provide the areas of each of the parking islands. 4. As one of the criteria for the application is to bring non-conforming sings into compliance, provide a dimensioned drawing or photograph of the sign. 5. One of the criteria for the appiication is that the off-street parking area shall be improved to meet CDC Section 3-1202.E. As such, meet the aforementioned Code requirements or inciude the deviations in the description of request in the submitted Comprehensive Landscape Program. Section 4-1008 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by September 12, 2013 at NOON. Failure to do so will result in the application being withdrawn. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4504 or matthew.jackson@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Matthew Jackson 9/4/2013 ��iic,r��_�L En��i.ol�l�n��l� �t<<n �r}�a�r:�'riv� r1r,l�ron� ENtnLr>�r:a�� e��e �_��_��o�,��e�e�ess ,�;,��; �' _ -..� �+i! 4g ��_ �' � � � 4x? � � 't., � + � �a �:,r �- . �.�.. r Y z �� .� � .�.i � f; ;'� ��I ol7�p K � !�°` � } -n . f � � 1 ,�� ;« -• • �c; �3� � a . x. - k _ , ,� F. 4i'l��i � I , . 4 u,� r t,:-aa N. ;...s� �� :,, .��.�,.� r.; `�"�p �r�„� �� y � 'i. ��' t , k ., »� p � F W yy.. '^l � 1 i'.. � k �' � , * . .. � 1� � . ., •: . � �� 1 . �b _� �� ; � . S�� < �A L `� � M �/' ..� .� i�', 'I' jt1.� M ,� M . � ,�� .... J� y r� f ��.,,,�;;ryrv...�� '� f�_ � "Fd.` 1� � 1 �' � ��'4 r .�k. � . - -,:� -. ' a, . . �li'4 � ��" �sr,� . ! I �� ,,. � ��_ � �....: x;, y .. `, — '�� ,� • � SI r ��,�.j: a .� .; �.y... � �l �'' ty ! i j�' !a. l!f ' . �� .'�'�' _ J �' : . .. . .... �: r!� �'^`:y�� " ''�' , � ;. � ; i ��-,_ � � �+ , � � ,� : �. ; �; : ft r+,.,;; � , gy ', !�}� 1' �'•, y � l: � d • , i F- ,. �- IMk�' •��iX��. .`ll . � ��.' •�+�'4� � �.tl �: � "� .T� ' �� ti ��' . I ��' II �� ,�� ,�.: � .' j µ /,� ! M ,��. �.f� � ? � e�Ysi9.k r. � �+� :'" r 1 ��"o�s.xa � � �' a +�� r .a . . : y ., t � � � � �'': ..�. I � y �ye� /F�� _�.,~�P h. ,.:, � !I't ,+ I�k,r�l��..:s �� .�"� � � w`-'�'�i."'.� ";�;, � r :� � �:, � 't � � � ... �� '. .i, ��,t"� "` f, r� °`#�;�'' ..,, i' � � �a� . r��t .u.,�... l � h l 1I n '. � :`� ~, � Y �� %. k} �� , � - � �A t r��i � f � r �� i 'a:',N ♦ , % �`.. . 'T � " �,y��*� i F � � y � L � y « , ; ., � �s,� ` u . c � �, �* + ' x: i "4 u�: '� ' � ��" �x� � I :' Y � � � � ..s;: .� , ...;� .. � �' .' � � ' n� Jx . � ...,� ..� �- � '.' ' �+. d � "`�,�'r�i + r��'s`�" ' .-�„ - � µ , , ... ::., , �.��n?-"� y<. �i t C . � i ) , . wz" t w > � � 7� . � � :% � p�� . , ��, +4 � i , � � a� � v �.�x.r,� , e� ' $� s%'� ,t : � t , . � � � � � � � - �{,; �, .�:�y 4�� 1� � �rr ,�� : � ;,y'�, t .F 1 — �� Fs t ; iii� �,,. c �` � ��} ��'� � �� "�� ``qF' a� �j� ' -� . � � �� : ��i��,f t��rr r � �j �,,,, � , t "{ � �� ! ,1 �, �� 4 e r�*i��'�� x P � �� I � ' ...4 *��,,�_�� a � f �. � z��k� � � �. _.� ,� � �yw�,,�?i �fw .,` � ..,�."'� i !z r � �t�;� 'i€°�. �r� �� :�m..�� 'k.t � � , yr J �,�'� � ,.� e �,•r � � , x / � � I � .. � �� i� � Y. \� � � �� " ,�� '�, f � _ �� k ;. j �,`` , o' � i�y �'i,, ` '�� f ,«;�•�. t ,,.r '� �. .s�— Y / � � q"; �� ' ,�� _C . � i y�� /a;t /f x" . i� ��+ ��,� �'�✓ j� F .��.� ,;''� ' � . ? �� t'r",�'"" .:1 i %'r� ,� �'�''�1� �jI �� . °� 1� � : t a �t ' �/ �; y;;� j�� ! t�.` i. — � 'r r �`'� �r � � ' ��ii� � �� _ � '� �, �', �� k � a w �, �, ` '�'� �- � ,s � �� `� � . t� + ,� ��, �, r �, � � `t ' ,r " , `, .� ��i rt a � . ''a�� a, �y, •� w •.. .- ' � d � �.- � � , : .�. � +; ,' i � F ♦ r ,,��'' �'.'�.�1 . �. ` �� ,�� ' � � ++''�� '�I �'�'�� . �'��tF� . .a � � » 1 � -`^�_: _. �` !. � ^.� 1 �� `�, 5.-w « r�� Y�� . . // �� ^w�� +,. � F , • yE h q e' ` � .,' 1 ,. �' : � i:. � �' wx..�. "^'�,.� � ,1� T� w ^Y . y� �..� y��,� ` � f Y�� d �kr � �� 1 p� �'� Y � � �l �kt� { �.� �'• '� \.� "'� "" _ ', �/ �dt �'� �+}h �:�' 1h �� } �� "� � 1'�... �.w+"�t � !� .f � ��} {`:�. �`L . " " .h+ � ..�� crmria++M �� ,.•' �'�,,,�k{�'„ � 4 itlr�,..£y ! �'_ _ . ....,' ' .: , . _. _„ .'��e �,: :;�, a�r l:P �k T 3 .P w ' :i sr�,a:sSE9S�..'x" } ,v _.. ,^, "� ' .. + �.s �.v, � t�i�' ,t'"' :� �� „t�. � } R ,M ;:.� � �y' ' . �� ;�f� "��• n � �__ ; �y4� t{.; r�y"��4��..�,�" ` . r"" Z� +�.z ��"'�� ' ,1� J , �,V .. � � ' 7,� t%+� � ,� s � 'j,�, �� t � �:p �' � �.✓ � � +�, � ""�.,,,, " . k. ; s� � �:. �r x w.��f" •� h'�� ft5��`�� : . t °� �. '� ,y r� � " � � ��.,'� °, ,y,,'e�.�---- '."y y � � y 1 ':Jr�` r" � �,, X"�� 1R,„ �k�,J a� I �� §- p'..E"e'i'rt i�%1.� �,,,,, r-..'v }�� p� P! r �'k^� 3 P � � ;� � I � ,�j � ��4 ,r ry,��,,�'�, � ; ,��k�`� v . � �ayn„� � .#� j �"f�. �� r�= '�- � �',,r n�� y yr�.,,r�r� i � ,� N � �sr �'�v' '`"w, ��`"� :z � �� ` ` �t, � �+`-,y,� . 7; • � . Y r .y P +.� ��c�.+r . � � w,: � � r�1 iir �. �,p �. ��. ` a f�'k .��Ja �nF �� k'+# yf ..�. t' :C `� � � y Sryi a � �" 'a �� .� - ' � �� y. �..%� s ° ` f �� h��R t� " a � .-w.r,�,��'",' �'' r"�"°'+ � � � a y: ,��._,,.�'. : '1�:, �,,.,,r.� � f" ' �: a � i`., � �..- � -. �L, � • d;�:: ,� �� A � a_ ,,,j� f � � 5. _T.� :• rXf � + ,. �, �� / r .u� ^ -Y '" �;� ¢� .?..-� rN ""�� ',�,�f, r,.+wy,,� m�.. . .wi a .�,N ' i�rr:RC:''.,' .. �/'� .,i}:! }'+°,f. � w:a' r �° . t e :�.. `�� T 1 � � - - [ ' �� 1 � � � � 1 � � � '�' z ..�.�� r � � , � t11 � ! : 4 '� ti+ i � �• _ ' �. � ?► ;- � � � ; � * r� . Y �" �� L ' . , �. , . � �� - � ' . . � . � . _i' � � . � r�,,,",� = � . .. . . � , p - ��1 . �� : a � '}. � .. � � , -� . . � � � � � '.� . I =► . • ► . •� �r r�:. r _ ,� �►� • , � �i � '�'. -.... ,. ► - /�. . , • �! /" t, . ,Mr , � � . � ,� • � . �- =� .e ,,,,,� ' . �"' � � - �-�- . , e�"," �_i r • ��► _bi�`'s.�� _ �_ - ( ■�1! �r �r M'" . ..- _..- � - '�"" + _ ,I� i� . � � � , � � �� ' �I. w� . �r � � � � _4 � � r � ' i . _ �� * �1 . '�1; ;� � � �r �► . , ,_ . � � �Ii�► �:- ,� �� .� �_ �� /` • , � � ' . �� . : + �"� L' � �,� � l ,� u i�► � . �� ' � ' � ' ,r- � u � �� rrrr� n w�n � in � A AIr+C 3� D.H. M/�i� � 16" O.H. MAX � 9' (�IAX . . . , aR 19' 6" MAX — 2X9X0.082 SMB 8" ROUND CONC. COLUMN 3'X3'X3' PIER ;: ..' r e. 3" 0.030 COMPOSITE ROOF PANEL ASPHALT ... .a a s . 7' MIN 4N �1�1i� ( DESGIN CRITERIA: FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 WIND SPEED: Vult = 1 �� MPH Vasd = 105 MPH WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY: [} RISK CATEGORY: 'I INTERNAL PREASURE COEFF: P TYPE OF STRUCTURE: _C1PEN DEFLECTION LIMITS: SUPPORTS U60 OTHER L/12Q 0 0 0 m � � � � M c+� O � c�'� `O d Ci ti >-. o � � �' �- ti .� z c � � � z�-� � � 0�0 � N � 00 U M � w ao� Y � � n �OM WOJ J �j LL � �wwo �Q� QU�ch zaa� U'N J � �`rUti � a � � �» �i � Z �� " WO �-�. Q � p �. 0.! Q } ^ `ti `.'� x J Y c�i �°�°�°�� Q � � � o �� oo� �� a°'g �� $ow � � � m �� 2/15/13 3/16"= 1'-0" 1 OF 4 FOUNDATION DETAIL: TYPE OF FOUNDATION: PIER PROPOSED OR EXISTING: �'��}�'�SE� DIMENSIONS: T=THICKNESS 36 IN D=DEPTH 36 IN W=WI DTH 36 I N REINFORCEMENT: SIZE BARS 4 # # OF BARS 2 CT 6X6 1010 VWVM NO FIBER NQ G�N�f�L NOTES: 9. SCREEN 18/14 2. ALUMiNUM EXTRUSION ALLOY = 6005-T5 3.THE SECTION MODULES SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN. 4. BOLTS & SCREWS: ALLOY 2024-T4, STAINLESS STEEL, &OR STEEL COATED MEETING IFI STANDARDS 5. ANCHOR BOLTS: GALVANIZED, STAINLESS STEEL, O°R STEEL COATED M�ETING IFI STANDARDS. 6. MlN1MUM CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH 3000PS1 AT 28DAYS. 7. REINFORCING STEEL: GRADE 60 8. SOtL BE,4RIN� PRESS�RE: 15U0 PSF (ASSI��D) G4�WTRACT4� RfSPO�+1S�8�E TO \fERI`FY 9. C01VCR'ETE ANCH'ORS: TAPCON SLEAVE ANCHC7R OR EQUAL M�N1`MUM 2" E'MBEIIM�ENT fM`O CONCRETE. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE EXISTING STRUCTURE TO VERIFY THE ADEQUACY TO SUPPORT LOADS OF THE NEW STRUCTURE UNDER ALL CONDITIONS. 11. WOOD MEMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2" THICK AND IN GOOD CONDITION. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN A ENGINEER TO PERFORM A FIELD INSPECTION IF THE CONTRACTOR BELIEVES THE CONDITIONS WARRANT FOUNDATION NOTES: 1. THE FOUNDATIOIVS SHOIl�/N ARE BASED ON A MINIMUM S01L BEARkNG PREASURE OF 1500 PSF. BEAR1lVG CAPACfTY OF S4�L S�-IALL BE VERI-�IED PRIOR TO PLACII�G TH� SLAB BY TEST OR SOItS LAB. 2. THE FOUNDATION SHALL BE CLEARED OF DEBRIS, VEGETATION, & COI�IIIPACTED PRIOR TO PLACE.�AENT O� GQ�I�R�TE. 3. NO FOOTING OTHER THAN 3 z" (4" NOMINAL) SLAB IS REQUIRED EXCEPT WHEN ADDRESSING EROSION UNTIL THE PROJECTION FROM THE HOST STRUCTURE EXCEEDS 20'-0". 4. ALL FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE 3KS1 MINIMUM. SLABS SHALL HAVE 6X6-1010 VWVM OR FIBERMESH. 5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SITE CONDITlONS. O O 0 m � � � � M m o � c� o Q C�i. ti � O � v d- � � � � � y � � � � � o�O � N �' 00 U C'7 � w a: d � Y � � o� �oM w 0 J J �j u- � � � � �WF-� oaQ�° QU.�M Zo � Ucv�t� � � U ti m d r � � � H Z �� OG � � � � � �� Q�� a� x �WM �� v m � �� w Qa� �° o �- � � � � a�� g �� S o w � m � � �� 2/15/13 NTS 20F5 � _ � � � � � _ � �� t� x � � �� t+� � � FOR� SITE RDRESS NRD LE(3AL� REGATTA BEACH RESORT �, 880 MANDALAY AVE O�� B°I�o�: AFFORDABLE ALUMINUM p�E�° RICHARD WASILEWSKI P.E. Clearwater< FL 33763 1990 STARKEY RD. 1520 CHATEAUWOOD DR. � W LARGO, FL 33771 CLEARWATER, FL 33764 727-531-"8104 32/28/15/74074/003/1000 as�u, cox�ncroR aes�vas �rt� era�r �o a��usm DIlIEtiSIONS RND DBTAILS ON 92TS AS 11k[�D NECESSARY. FIBI6H SIZS NAY VARY, � ' �' . rs rrcutt�l tniin � Mi� MLN WHERE AWiAINUM 5 C(INGRFfE '—' (2} �" X 5" ALUMINI PINS EAGH SIf�E IN CK}VER 6" A�AX fE CQLi1�4N EBAR 20" OvFRU►P kd�ra �UDARD 90 DEG H�OK ��I�+i{ �� RHALT 5" MIN � � g, �4 REBAR i�1T � � I t�AT INITH 3" C(}11ER �tl�i �'� �� m-I � �'� �':�HE�. ��-�E� �F�LL �E i`'' L�GER THE�, P�EL THI�'I�h1ESS �r1TH 1�" E��E DI�T��E, �f�.:.ED `" fFC�t� E�1[3'� �hJ� r��.xl►�:�� t�� .�, ::��:��i�� ;_ �� ,AT�(��TE �F � ��. �� L� �E�' �i 1 i� EF ,_ h!T TC� E�I�STI�I� �� H��r �,��i_� �F �t�� ni�r�� t�" � � .�. tt� �:Q�1�REfF t'l� � [i[:K�. ��l �' Il�' T�P�1�1fTH 1�" E�BE[�IEt�T T� EXI�TI�G H�T, 1 �" E�GE I�I`�TA��E i �" �.�. � � � � � � � �� .�.�. �N :��E 0 0 0 C�'� r � � M cj O W M O � C� t` ?-� O � V d- � Q � a� � � � z � �— � � � � � � 0�0 � N � 00 U M � ui ao� m Y p� �OM W � J J � � � � � �w�° �Q� Q U � M � UN Jf� ��U� a � � �� Z �� .r F+-1 Q � T� 'i'i � � � a � x J � M � � U m Y a� v� W aQLL �� 0 � � ��> � Q�'g �� °a @y � 57 � c°.. m oow 2/15/13 NTS 40F4