The URL can be used to link to this page

HDA2013-08007° C earwater � 625 S GULFVIEW HDA2013-08007 1 Clearwater Beach Econo Zoning: Tourist BLVD Atlas #: 285A _ _ ___r��y Reserve �nt Department � Development Agreement Application IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPUCATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR INITIAL REVIEW BY THE UTY tbUNqL. SUBSEQUENT REVIEW BY THE CITY COUNCIL WILL REQUIRE AN ADDITIONAL 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPUCATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPUCATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPUCANT, BY FILING THIS APPUCATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNI71f DEVELOPMENT CODE. APPLICATION FEE: $1,500 PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Ted Lenart and Maria Lenart, Tnistees of Lenart Family Trust UTD December 20, 1991 MAILING ADDRESS: 8556 W. Winnemac, Noridge, Chicago, IL PHONE NUMBER: EMAII: AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Hill Ward Henderson, PA. (E.D. Mnstrong III, Esq. and Katherine E. Cole, Esq.) MAILING ADDRE55: 311 Pa�lc Place, Sufte 240, Clearvwater, FL 33759-4904 PHONE NUMBER: 727-259-6791 EMAIL: kcole@hwhlaw.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 625 S. Gulfview Blvd., Clearvvater, FL 33767 PARCEL NUMBER(5): 17'29'�5-05�04-003'006� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: � attached Exhibit A PROPOSED USE(S): Ovemight acoommodations DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See attached Exhibit B Specifically idenrfy the request (include all requested code Jlexibility; e.g., reductlon in required number of parking spoces, heigh� setbacks, lot size, lot width, specific use, etc.): Planning 8 Developmeot Departrnent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727�62�567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 4 06H 3 LL Planning & Development Department ° � earwat�r Hotel Density Reserve � Development Agreement Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. T ZONING DISTRICT: FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: RFH/ P EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: HOTEL .• SITE AREA: 29•88$ sq. ft. ,gg acres GROS$ FLOOR AREA (approximate square footages): DENSITY (rooms per acre): Hotel Use: 63,849 sq. ft. Existing: 93 UNITS/ ACRE Accessory Uses: 1,559 sq. ft. Proposed: 149.2 UNITS/ ACRE Total: 65,408 sq. ft. Maximum Permitted: 150 UNITS/ ACRE BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (is` floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: 6,404 sq. ft. ( 21 •4 % of site) Proposed: 14,991 sq, ft. ( 50.2 % of site) Maximum Permitted: 28,394 sq. ft. ( 95 % of site) IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: $�•� Proposed: ��•$$ Maximum Permitted: 95 OFF-STREET PARKING BUILDING HEIGHT: Existing: 54 Existing: 5 STORIES Proposed: 126 Proposed: 10 STORIES: 91'-2" T.O. ROOF SLAB + 16' MECH. Minimum Required: 103 RMS X 12 = 124 Maximum Permitted: <100'-0" T.O. ROOF SLAB + 16' MECH. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this �'� day of representations made in this application are true and �;'lr\t �. Y accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize 1/ .__ � ��v�,� to me and/or b City representatives to visit and photograph the � .liA.�i • 1,�� , who is nersonally known has property described in this application. produced as identification. Y .�. . r� \ �i /^i r r. I '�._ . . • � . Sign�ture of property owner or representative � Nb�ary pu �'�s::��..,,. JENt�qFER PEFiFiU7Z1 ission expires: �� -� ;�,��' __.Mrcc�a�cSinNeFi 2014 Bonded Thru Notary PubHc Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-456'7!'FdR'7Zi-36Z� Page 2 of 4 06113 LL ° � earwater Planning & Development Department Hotel Density Reserve � Development Agreement Application Site Plan Submittal Package Checklist IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPUCATION, ALL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE AN INITIAL SUBMITTAL PACKAGE CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: ❑ A conceptual site plan that depids the building footprint, off-street parking, landscape areas, and ingress and egress points. ❑ Architedural elevations for all sides of the buiiding. ❑ A massing study that illustrates the building form (including stepbacks) on aii sides of the building. ❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage. ❑ A proposed development agreement which shall contain, at a minimum, the following information: ❑ A legal description of the land subject to the development agreement. ❑ The names of all persons having legai or equitable ownership of the land. ❑ The duration of the development agreement, which shall not exceed ten (10) years. ❑ The development uses proposed for the land, including population densities, building intensities and building height. ❑ A description of the public facilities and services that will serve the development, including who shall provide such public facilities and services; the date any new public facilities and services, if needed, will be constructed; who shall bear the expense of construction of any new public facilities and services; and a schedule to assure that the pubiic facilities and services are available concurrent with the impacts of the development. The development agreement shall provide for a cashier's check, a payment and performance bond or letter of credit in the amount of 115% of the estimated cost of the public facilities and services, to be deposited with the city to secure construction of any new public facilities and services required to be construded by the development agreement. The development agreement shall provide that such construdion shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy. 0 A desc�iption of any reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. ❑ A description of all local development approvals approved or needed to be approved for the development. ❑ A finding that the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Community Development Code. Additionally, a finding that the requirements for concurrency as set forth in Article 4, Division 10, Community Development Code, have been satisfied. ❑ A description of any conditions, terms, restrictions or other requirements determined to be necessary by the City Council for the public health, safety or welfare of the citizens of the City of Clearvvater. Such conditions, terms, restrictions or other requirements may be supplemental to requirements in existing codes or ordinances of the City. 0 A statement indicating that the failure of the development agreement to address a particular permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve the developer of the necessity of compiying with the law goveming said permitting requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions. ❑ The development agreement may provide, in the discretion of the City Council, that the entire development or any phase thereof be commenced or be completed within a specific period of time. The development agreement may provide for liquidated damages, the denial of future development approvais, the termination of the development agreement, or the withholding of certificates of occupancy for the failure of the developer to comply with any such deadline. ❑ A statement that the burdens of the development agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of the development agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the parties to the development agreement. ❑ All development agreements shall specifically state that subsequently adopted ordinances and codes of the city which are of general application not governing the development of land shall be applicable to the lands subject to the development agreement, and that such modificatio�s are specifically anticipated in the development agreement. Planning 3 Developrnent Departrnent,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Cl�rwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727�b62�4567; Fax: 727-662�865 Page 3 of 4 06H 3 LL Planning & Development Department ° �learwater Hotel Density Reserve � Development Agreement Application Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: Ted Lenart and Maria Lenart, Trustees of Lenart Family Trust UTD December 20, 1991 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the foilowing described property: 625 South Gulfview Bivd., Clearwater, FL 33767 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): Termination of non-conforming status of existing overnight accommodations and grant of units from hotei densit� reserve. 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Hill Ward Henderson, P.A. (E.D. Armstrong III, Esq. or Katherine E. Cole, Esq.) as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7, That (��e)1 the undersigned authority, her by certify that the foregoing is true and correc4. , � ��/, -� �E � � i, t�: C`'� l G`'� Property Owner Property Owner Ted Lenart, Trustee Property Owner Maria Lenart, Trustee STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON � i� ' 1 � THIS � � -- DAY OF ,�.t.,G r;,�r , .>^�� / � , PERSONALLY APPEARED � WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SFiE SIGNED. � �--� «OFFICIALSEAL" .�,�"�- `��,�� ANGELINE M. TERRANA �' ' -�- Notary Public, State of Illinois Notary Public Signature M Commission Expires 08-02-14 Notary My Commission Expires: C' ��/ �f Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 4 pg/�3 Hotel Density Reserve Development Agreement Application 625 S. Gulfview Blvd. Lenart Family Trust Exhibit "A" Legal Description Lots 6 and 7, Block C, BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION NO. 5, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 38, Page 38, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Exhibit "B" Description of Request The applicant requests approval of a development agreement which will grant 691 units from the Hotel Density Reserve as permitted by Beach by Design, consistent with the terms of the proposed Development Agreement. The proposed project is to replace the existing, 64 unit aged hotel property with a new, 103 unit mid-priced resort. The proposed design of the project meets the design requirements of Beach by Design and appropriate exhibits are included with this application showing the mass and scale of the proposed building as well as the distance between other structures. The existing hotel is currently five stories while the proposed project is ten stories to roof slab. The redevelopment of this property will increase the available parking (consistent with Code) and reduce the impervious surface ratio by providing structured parking rather than all surface parking. Beach by Design provides for the Hotel Density Reserve to allow for smaller property owners to maximize the use of their property with the construction of mid-sized, mid-priced hotel product which is indentified in Beach by Design as a community need. According to Beach by Design, these mid-priced hotels have an average of 100 units which is necessary to attract a"flag" or known operator. The applicant's request for units fits with this number of units and creates the final piece of successful redevelopment along the water on South Gulfview Blvd. The hotels on either side of the applicant's property have received density units and are currently undergoing redevelopment to attract this type of visitor to Clearwater Beach. Prior to submitting this application for approval of units from the Hotel Density Reserve, the applicant applied for a termination of nonconforming status as to the existing hotel. The property currently has 64 units which is 93 units per acre. Based on the land use category of Resort Facilities High, the property is nonconforming as to 30 of the existing units. In the event the community Development Board approves the termination of nonconforming status, then the number of units requested from the hotel density reserve will be reduced by 30. 1 In the event the termination of non-conforming status is granted prior to the adoption and approval of the development agreement, the request would be for 39 units from the Hotel Density Reserve. To illustrate the density, below is a chart of the units by right, existing unit count, and the proposed development. Number of Units Units per Acre NOTES (.69 acres) RFH land use 34 50 units/acre Existing 64 93 units/acre Requested termination of Development nonconforming status as to the 30 units in excess of Code Proposed 103 149.3 units/acre Request for 69 units from the Development — Hotel Density Reserve w/o termination of nonconforming status Proposed Request for 39 units from the Development — Hotel Density Reserve w/termination of nonconforming status 4774058v1 `-. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT") is dated the day of , 2013, and entered into between Ted Lenart and Maria Lenart, Trustees of the Lenart Family Trust, utd December 20, 1991 ("Developer"), its successors and assigns, and the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida acting through its City Council, the governing body thereof ("City"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, one of the major elements of the City's revitalization effort is a preliminary plan for the revitalization of Clearwater Beach entitled Beach by Design; and WHEREAS, Sections 163.3220 - 163.3243, Florida Statutes, which set forth the Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act ("Act"), authorize the City to enter into binding development agreements with persons having a legal or equitable interest in real property located within the corporate limits of the City; and WHEREAS, under Section 163.3223 of the Act, the City has adopted Section 4- 606 of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code ("Code"), establishing procedures and requirements to consider and enter into development agreements; and WHEREAS, Beach by Design proposed additional hotel units to equalize development opportunities on the beach and ensure Clearwater Beach remains a quality, family resort community by further providing for a limited pool of additional hotel units ("Hotel Density Reserve") to be made available for such mid-sized hotel projects; and WHEREAS, the Developer controls approximately 0.95 acres of real property ("Property") in the corporate limits of the City, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to develop the Property to add overnight accommodation units, minimal meeting space for guest use, pool/tiki bar, lobby and parking with parking spaces, generally conforming to the architectural elevation dimensions shown in composite Exhibit "B" (collectively, the improvements are the "Project"); and WHEREAS, upon completion the planned resort will contain 103 units, which includes a maximum of sixty nine (69) units from the available Hotel Density Reserve ("Reserve Units"); and WHEREAS, the City has conducted such hearings as are required by and in accordance with Chapter 163.3220 Fla. Stat. (2012) and any other applicable law; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that, as of the Effective Date of this Agreement, the proposed project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations; and WHEREAS, the City has conducted public hearings as required by §§ 4-206 and 4-606 of the Community Development Code; and WHEREAS, at a duly called public meeting on , 2013, the City Council approved this Agreement and authorized and directed its execution by the appropriate officials of the City; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Board approved the design and site plan as FLD2013- on , 2013, conditioned upon the approval and execution of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, approval of this Agreement is in the interests of the City in furtherance of the City's goals of enhancing the viability of the resort community and in furtherance of the objectives of Beach by Design; and WHEREAS, Developer has approved this Agreement and has duly authorized certain individuals to execute this Agreement on Developer's behalf. STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT In consideration of and in reliance upon the premises, the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound and in accordance with the Act, agree as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are a part of this Agreement. SECTION 2. Incorporation of the Act. This Agreement is entered into in compliance with and under the authority of the Code and the Act, the terms of which as of the date of this Agreement are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part of this Agreement. Words used in this Agreement without definition that are defined in the Act shall have the same meaning in this Agreement as in the Act. SECTION 3. Propertv Subiect to this A�reement. The Property described in Exhibit "A" is subject to this Agreement ("Property"). 3.1 The Property currently has a land use designation of Resort Facilities High (RFH) and is zoned Tourist (T). 3.2. The Property is owned in fee simple or under contract to be owned in fee simple by the Developer. 2 3.3 The Property is generally located at 625 S. Gulfview Blvd., Clearwater, FL 33767 as more further described in Exhibit "A". SECTION 4. Scope of Proiect. 4.1 The Project shall consist of no more than 103 overnight accommodation units. Such units may be traditional hotel rooms or fractional ownership units, as defined by the Community Development Code. 4.2 The Project shall include a minimum of 126 parking spaces, as defined in the Community Development Code. 4.3 The design of the Project, as represented in Exhibit "B", is consistent with Beach by Design, except as otherwise shown on Exhibit "B". 4.4 No more than 25% of overnight accommodation units shall have full kitchens. Such kitchens shall be limited to those units identified on the plans in Exhibit "B" as "suites" and shall not be located in any unit received from the Hotel Density Reserve. 4.5 The height shall not exceed one hundred (100) feet from Base Flood Elevation, as defined in the Code. SECTION 5. Effective Date/Duration of this Agreement. 5.1 This Agreement shall not be effective until this Agreement is properly recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and thirty (30) days have elapsed after having been received by the Department of Community Affairs pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 1633239 and Clearwater Community Development Code Section 4606G. 2. 5.2 Within fourteen (14) days after the City approves the execution of this Agreement, the City shall record the Agreement with the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County. The Developer shall pay the cost of such recording. The City shall submit to the Department of Community Affairs a copy of the recorded Agreement within fourteen (14) days after the Agreement is recorded. 5.3 This Agreement shall continue in effect until terminated, as defined herein, but for a period not to exceed ten (10) years. SECTION 6. Obligations under this Agreement. 6.1 Obligations of the Developer: �j 6.1.1 The obligations under this Agreement shall be binding upon and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to the Developer, its successors in interests or assigns. 6.1.2 At the time of development of the Property, the Developer will submit such applications and documentation as are required by law and shall comply with the City's Code applicable at the time of building permit review. Property: 6.1.3 The following restrictions shall apply to development of the 6.1.3.1 To retain the grant of Reserve Units provided for herein, the Property and improvements located thereon shall be developed in substantial conformance with the Site Plan attached as Exhibit "B". Any modifications determined by the Planning Director as either inconsistent with attached Exhibit "B" or constituting a substantial deviation from attached Exhibit "B" shall require an amendment to this Agreement in accordance with the procedures of the Act and the Code, as necessary and applicable. Any and all such approved and adopted amendments shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. 6.1.3.2 The Developer shall obtain permits, including appropriate site plan approvals pursuant to a Level One or Level Two development application, and commence construction on the development within four (4) years from the effective date of this Agreement ("Commencement Date"). Nothing herein shall restrict Developer from seeking an extension of this Agreement, and the Commencement Date, pursuant to the Code or state law. 6.1.3.3 The Developer shall execute, prior to commencement of construction, a mandatory evacuation/closure covenant, substantially in the form of Exhibit "C", that the accommodation use will closed as soon as practicable after a hurricane watch that includes Clearwater Beach is posted by the National Hurricane Center. 6.1.4 Covenant of Unified Use. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the Project, the Developer hereby agrees to execute the covenant of unified use and development for the Project Site providing that the Project Site shall be developed and used as a single project, the form of which covenant is attached as Exhibit "D"; provided however, that nothing shall preclude the Developer from selling the Fractional Share Units or from selling all or a portion of the Developer's Property in the event that Developer determines not to construct the Project. It is understood and agreed that, in the event that the Developer enters into the anticipated covenant of unifed use and development, and the Developer elects not to construct the Project and notifies the City of its election in writing, and, alternatively, as of the date of expiration, termination or 0 revocation any rights of Developer to incorporate the Hotel Density Reserve Units into the Project, the City shall execute and deliver to the Developer a termination of such covenant of unified use and development suitable for recording in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 6.1.5 Return of Units to Reserve Pool. Any Reserve Units granted to Developer not timely constructed in conjunction with the Project shall be returned to the Hotel Density Reserve and be unavailable to Developer for use on this Project. On October , 2013, the Community Development Board granted a Termination of Non-conforming Status pursuant to Case No. FLD2013- In the event the conditions associated with the Termination of Non-conforming Status are met thereby vesting the density approved in FLD2013- , Developer hereby agrees that the grant of Hotel Density Reserve Units as contemplated herein shall be reduced by the thirty (30) units determined to be conforming by FLD2013- 6.1.6 Transient Use. Occupancy in the overnight accommodation units from the hotel density is limited to a term of less than one (1) month or thirty (30) consecutive days, whichever is less. Nothing herein shall prevent a purchaser of a fractional share unit from owning a period of time greater than thirty (30) days, provided every occupancy is limited to thirty (30) consecutive days or one (1) month. 6.1.7 Inspection of Records. Developer shall make available for inspection to the City its books and records pertaining to each Hotel Density Reserve unit upon reasonable notice to confirm compliance with these regulations as allowed by general law. 6.1.8 Limitation on Am�lified Music. Developer agrees that there shall be no outdoor amplified music at the Project after 11:00 p.m. on Sunday through Thursday, or after 12:00 midnight on Friday and Saturday. 6.1.9 Termination of Nonconformin� S�. 6.2 Obligations of the City. 6.2.1 The City shall promptly process site and construction plan applications for the Property that are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Concept Plan and that meet the requirements of the Code. 6.2.2 The final effectiveness of the re-designations referenced in Section 6.2.1 is subject to: 6.2.2.1 The provisions of Chapters 163 and 166, Florida Statutes, as they may govern such amendments; and 6.2.2.2 The expiration of any appeal periods or, if an appeal is filed, at the conclusion of such appeal. G 6.2.3 The Project shall receive Fifty-Five (55) units from the Hotel Density Reserve as defined in Beach by Design. SECTION 7. Public Facilities to Service Development. The following public facilities are presently available to the Property from the sources indicated below. Development of the Property will be governed by the concurrency ordinance provisions applicable at the time of development approval. With respect to transportation and other public infrastructure and services subject to concurrency requirements, all applicable concurrency provisions for the proposed development have been met, including the Metropolitan Planning Organization concurrency management. 7.1 Potable water is available from the City. The Developer shall be responsible for all necessary main extensions and applicable connection fees. 7.2 Sewer service is currently provided by the City. The Developer shall be responsible for all necessary main extensions and applicable connection fees. 7.3 Fire protection from the City. 7.4 Drainage facilities for the Property will be provided by the Developer at the Developer's sole expense. 7.5 All improvements associated with the public facilities identified in Subsections 7.1 through 7.4 shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy. SECTION 8. Reauired Local Government Permits. The required local government development permits for development of the Property include, without limitation, the following: 8.1 Site plan approval(s) and associated utility licenses, access, and right-of- way utilization permits; 8.2 Construction plan approval(s); 8.3 Building permit(s); and 8.4 Certificate(s) of occupancy. SECTION 9. Consistencv. The City finds that development of the Property is consistent with the terms this Agreement is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and the Code. SECTION 10. Termination. G� 10.1 If the Developer's obligations set forth in this Agreement are not followed in a timely manner, as reasonably determined by the City Manager, after notice to the Developer and an opportunity to be heard, existing permits shall be administratively suspended and issuance of new permits suspended until the Developer has fulfilled its obligations. Failure to timely fulfill its obligations may serve as a basis for termination of this Agreement by the City, at the discretion of the City and after notice to the Developer and an opportunity for the Developer to be heard. SECTION 11. Other Terms and Conditions. 11.1 Except in the case of termination, until ten (10) years after the date of this Agreement, the Property shall not be subject to down-zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, unless the City has held a public hearing and determined: 11.1.1 That substantial changes have occurred in pertinent conditions existing at the time of approval of this Agreement; or 11.1.2 This Agreement is based on substantially inaccurate information provided by the Developer; or 11.1.3 That the change is essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. SECTION 12. Compliance with Law. The failure of this Agreement to address any particular permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve the Developer from the necessity of complying with the law governing such permitting requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions. SECTION 13. Notices. Notices and communications required or desired to be given under this Agreement shall be given to the parties by hand delivery, by nationally recognized overnight courier service such as Federal Express, or by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows (copies as provided below shall be required for proper notice to be given): If to the Developer: Ted and Maria Lenart, Trustees of the Lenart Family Trust, u/tJd/ December 20, 1991 8556W. Winnemac, Noridge Chicago, IL With Copy to: Katherine E. Cole, Esq. Hill Ward Henderson 311 Park Place, Suite 240 Clearwater, FL 33759 If to City: City of Clearwater, City Attorney ATTN: Pamela Akin, Esq. 112 South Osceola Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 7 Properly addressed, postage prepaid, notices or communications shall be deemed delivered and received on the day of hand delivery, the next business day after deposit with an overnight courier service for next day delivery, or on the third 3rd day following deposit in the United States mail, certified mail, return receipt requested. The parties may change the addresses set forth above (including the addition of a mortgagee to receive copies of all notices), by notice in accordance with this Section. SECTION 14. Assignments. 14.1 By the Developer: 14.1.1 Prior to the Commencement Date, the Developer may sell, convey, assign or otherwise dispose of any or all of its right, title, interest and obligations in and to the Project, or any part thereof, only with the prior written notice to the City, provided that such party (hereinafter referred to as the "assignee"), to the extent of the sale, conveyance, assignment or other disposition by the Developer to the assignee, shall be bound by the terms of this Agreement the same as the Developer for such part of the Project as is subject to such sale, conveyance, assignment or other disposition. 14.1.2 If the assignee of the Developer's right, title, interest and obligations in and to the Project, or any part thereof assumes all of the Developer's obligations hereunder for the Project, or that part subject to such sale, conveyance, assignment or other disposition, then the Developer shall be released from all such obligations hereunder which have been so assumed by the assignee, and the City agrees to execute an instrument evidencing such release, which shall be in recordable form. 14.1.3 An assignment of the Project, or any part thereof, by the Developer to any corporation, limited partnership, limited liability company, general partnership, or joint venture, in which the Developer (or an entity under common control with Developer) has either the controlling interest or through a joint venture or other arrangement shares equal management rights and maintains such controlling interest or equal management rights shall not be deemed an assignment or transfer subject to any restriction on or approvals of assignments or transfers imposed by this Agreement, provided, however, that notice of such assignment shall be given by the Developer to the City not less than thirty (30) days prior to such assignment being effective and the assignee shall be bound by the terms of this Agreement to the same extent as would the Developer in the absence of such assignment. 14.1.4 No assignee, purchaser, sublessee or acquirer of all or any part of the Developer's rights and obligations with respect to any one Parcel shall in any way be obligated or responsible for any of the Developer's obligations with respect to any other Parcel by virtue of this Agreement unless and until such assignee, 8 purchaser, sublessee or acquire has expressly assumed the Developer's such other obligations. 14.1.5 Notwithstanding any other provision of this paragraph, the sale of individual Interval Ownership Units in the ordinary course of business shall not be subject to the requirements of this paragraph. 14.2 Successors and Assigns. The terms herein contained shall bind and inure to the benefit of the City, and its successors and assigns, and the Developer and, as applicable to the parties comprising Developer, their personal representatives, trustees, heirs, successors and assigns, except as may otherwise be specifically provided herein. SECTION 15. Minor Non-Comuliance. The Developer will not be deemed to have failed to comply with the terms of this Agreement in the event such noncompliance, in the judgment of the City Manager, reasonably exercised, is of a minor or inconsequential nature. SECTION 16. Covenant of Cooneration. The parties shall cooperate with and deal with each other in good faith and assist each other in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement and in achieving the completion of development of the Property. SECTION 17. Approvals. Whenever an approval or consent is required under or contemplated by this Agreement such approval or consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. All such approvals and consents shall be requested and granted in writing. SECTION 18. Completion of Agreement. Upon the completion of performance of this Agreement or its revocation or termination, a statement evidencing such completion, revocation or termination shall be signed by the parties hereto and recorded in the official records of the City. SECTION 19. Entire A�reement. This Agreement (including any and all Exhibits attached hereto all of which are a part of this Agreement to the same extent as if such Exhibits were set forth in full in the body of this Agreement), constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof. SECTION 20. Construction. The titles, captions and section numbers in this Agreement are inserted for convenient reference only and do not define or limit the scope or intent and should not be used in the interpretation of any section, subsection or provision of this Agreement. Whenever the context requires or permits, the singular shall include the plural, and plural shall include the singular and any reference in this Agreement to the Developer includes the Developer's successors or assigns. This Agreement was the production of negotiations between representatives for the City and the Developer and the language of the Agreement should be given its plain and ordinary meaning and should not be strictly construed against any party hereto based upon 0 draftsmanship. If any term or provision of this Agreement is susceptible to more than one interpretation, one or more of which render it valid and enforceable, and one or more of which would render it invalid or unenforceable, such term or provision shall be construed in a manner that would render it valid and enforceable. SECTION 21. Partial Invaliditv. If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is declared invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, including any valid portion of the invalid term or provision and the application of such invalid term or provision to circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby and shall with the remainder of this Agreement continue unmodified and in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if such responsibilities of any party hereto, to the extent that the purpose of this Agreement or the benefits sought to be received hereunder are frustrated, such party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon fifteen (15) days written notice to the other parties. SECTION 22. Code Amendments. Subsequently adopted ordinances and codes of the City which is of general application not governing the development of land shall be applicable to the Property, and such modifications are specifically anticipated in this Agreement. SECTION 23. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida without regard to the conflict of laws principles of such state. SECTION 24. Counteraarts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall continue one and the same instrument. SECTION 25. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by mutual written consent of the City, the Developer, and the Association so long as the amendment meets the requirements of the Act, applicable City ordinances, and Florida law. IN WIT'NESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. In the Presence of: Lenart Family Trust, u/dd December 20, 1991 Print Name Print Name Maria Lenart, co-Trustee 10 Print Name Print Name As to "Developer" Print Name: Print Name As to "City" STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS Maria Lenart, Successor Trustee to Ted Lenart CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA I� William B Horne II, City Manager Attest: Rosemarie Call, City Clerk Countersigned: George Cretekos, Mayor Approved as to Form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2013, by He is [] personally known to me or has [] produced as identification. 11 Notary Public Print Name: My Commission Expires: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLA5 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2013, by WILLIAM B. HORNE, II, as City Manager of the City of Clearwater, Florida, who is [ ] personally known to me or who has [ ] produced as identification. Notary Public Print Name: My Commission Expires: 12 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Project Site 14 EXHIBIT "C" COVENANT REGARDING HURRICANE EVACUATION And DEVELOPMENT, USE AND OPERATION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ("Declaration") is made as of the day of , 2013, by Ted Lenart and Maria Lenart, Trustees of the Lenart Family Trust utd December 20,1991 ("Developer"). Developer is the owner of fee simple title to the real property described in Schedule 1 attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter, the ("Real Property"). The City of Clearwater, Florida (the "City"), has amended it's Comprehensive Plan to designate Clearwater Beach as a Community Redevelopment District pursuant to the Pinellas County Planning Council Rules in order to implement the provisions of Beach by Design, a plan for the revitalization of Clearwater Beach. The designation of Clearwater Beach as a Community Redevelopment District (the "Designation") provides for the allocation of Hotel Density Reserve Units as an incentive for the development of mid-size quality hotels. Pursuant to the Designation, the allocation of Hotel Density Reserve Units is subject to compliance with a series of performance standards, including a requirement that resorts containing a hotel developed with Hotel Density Reserve Units shall be closed and all Guests evacuated from such resorts as soon as practicable after the National Hurricane Center posts a hurricane watch that includes Clearwater Beach. The purpose of such evacuation is to ensure that such a Resort Hotel is evacuated in advance of the period of time when a hurricane evacuation would be expected in advance of the approach of hurricane force winds. The City has granted, by City Council Resolution , passed and approved on , 2013, Developer's application for Hotel Density Reserve Units pursuant to the Designation, subject to Developer's compliance with the requirements of the Designation. Developer desires for itself, and its successors and assigns, as owner, to establish certain rights, duties, obligations and responsibilities with respect to the use and operation of the Real Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of the allocation of the Hotel Density Reserve Units to the City and the Designation, which rights, duties, obligations and responsibilities shall be binding on any and all successors and assigns and will run with the title to the Real Property. THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and restrictions herein set forth and to be observed and performed, and in further consideration of the allocation of Hotel Density Reserve Units to Developer, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Developer hereby declares, covenants and agrees as follows: 1. Benefit and Enforcement. These covenants and restrictions are made for the benefit of Developer and its successors and assigns and shall be enforceable by them and also for the benefit of the residents of the City and shall be enforceable on behalf of said residents by the City Council of the City. 2. Covenant of Development, Use and Operation. Developer hereby covenants and agrees to the development, use and operation of the Real Property in accordance with the provisions of this Declaration. 2.1 Use. The use of the resort on the Real Property is restricted as follows: 16 2.1.1 A minimum of Fifty-five units, which is the number of hotel units allocated to Developer, shall be used solely for transient occupancy of one month or thirty (30) consecutive days or less, must be licensed as a public lodging establishment and classified as a hotel, and must be operated by a single licensed operator of the hotel. No such hotel unit shall be used as a primary or permanent residence. 2.1.2 All other units shall be licensed as a public lodging establishment. No unit shall be used as a primary or permanent residence. 2.1.3 As used herein, the terms "transient occupancy," "public lodging establishment," "hotel," "time share," and "operator" shall have the meaning given to such terms in Chapter 509, Part I, Florida Statutes (2012). 2.2 Closure of Improvements and Evacuation. The Hotel developed on the Real Property shall be closed as soon as practicable upon the issuance of a hurricane watch by the National Hurricane Center, which hurricane watch includes Clearwater Beach, and all Hotel guests, visitors and employees other than emergency and security personnel required to protect the resort, shall be evacuated from the Hotel as soon as practicable following the issuance of said hurricane watch. In the event that the National Hurricane Center shall modify the, terminology employed to warn of the approach of hurricane force winds, the closure and evacuation provisions of this Declaration shall be governed by the level of warning employed by the National Hurricane Center which precedes the issuance of a forecast of probable landfall in order to ensure that the guests, visitors and employees will be evacuated in advance of the issuance of a forecast of probable landfall. 3 Effective Date. This Declaration shall become effective upon issuance of all building permits required to build the project ("Project") and Developer's commencement of construction of the Project, as evidence by a Notice of Commencement for the Project. This Declaration shall expire and terminate automatically if and when the allocation of Reserve Units to the Developer expires or is terminated. 4 Governing Law. This Declaration shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Florida. 5 Recordin�. This Declaration shall be recorded in the chain of title of the Real Property with the Clerk of the Courts of Pinellas County, Florida. 6 Attorneys' Fees. Developer shall reimburse the City for any expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, which are incurred by the City in the event that the City determines that it is necessary and appropriate to seek judicial enforcement of this Declaration and the City obtains relief, whether by agreement of the parties or through order of a court of competent jurisdiction. 7 Severabilitv. If any provision, or part thereof, of this Declaration or the application of this Declaration to any person or circumstance will be or is declared to any extent to e invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Declaration, or the application of such provision or portion thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not be affected thereby, and each and every other provision of this Declaration shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer has caused this Declaration to be executed this day of , 2013. 17 In the Presence of: Print Name Print Name As to "Developer" Print Name: Print Name As to "City" : CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA : William B Horne II, City Manager Attest: Rosemarie Call, City Clerk Countersigned: George Cretekos, Mayor Approved as to Form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney 18 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this He is [ ] personally known to as identification. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS day of _ me or has Notary Public Print Name: My Commission Expires: 2013, by produced The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2013, by WILLIAM B. HORNE, II, as City Manager of the City of Clearwater, Florida, who is [] personally known to me or who has [ ] produced as identification. Notary Public Print Name: My Commission Expires: 19 EXHIBIT "D" COVENANT OF UNIFIED USE PLEASE RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO: COVENANT OF UNIFIED USE THIS COVENANT OF UNIFIED USE (the "Agreement") is executed this day of , 2013, by Bay Esplanade Project, LLC ("Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of the real property legally described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Real Property"); and WHEREAS, Developer and the City of Clearwater, Florida (the "City") are parties to that certain Development Agreement dated , 2013 (the "Development Agreement"), pursuant to which the City has agreed that Developer may develop and construct upon the Real Property a hotel project as described in the Development Agreement (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, Developer intends to develop and operate the Real Property for a unified use, as more particularly described in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Developer does hereby agree that, effective as of the date on which Developer receives all permits required to construct the Project and Developer commences construction thereof, as evidenced by a Notice of Commencement for the Project, the Real Property shall be developed and operated as a hotel and fractional share/interval ownership project, as described in the Development Agreement. The restrictions set forth in the preceding sentence shall expire automatically when and if Developer's allocation of additional hotel units (as defined in the Development Agreement) expires or is terminated. Nothing in this Agreement shall require Developer to develop the Project or restrict Developer's ability to sell, assign, transfer or otherwise convey its right in and to the Real Property or any portion or portions thereof to unrelated third-parties. Further, nothing in this Agreement shall preclude the purchase and sale of one or more Fractional Share Units to be constructed as a part of the Project (the "Fractional Ownership") (or Hotel Units (as defined in the Development Agreement) if sold in a condominium form of ownership), to separate, unrelated third parties, provided that such Fractional Share Ownership or Hotel Units are operated and occupied as part of the Project as a single unified project throughout the term of this Agreement. Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all Hotel Units may be operated by a single hotel operator and all Fractional Share Units may be operated by a different, single management firm/operator. 20 , + IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Developer has caused this Agreement to be executed this day of , 2013. In the Presence of: Bay Esplanade Project, LLC, a Florida limited Liability company By: Print Name Print Name As to "Developer" Print Name: Print Name As to "City" Dustin de Nunzio CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: William B Horne II, City Manager Attest: Rosemarie Call, City Clerk Countersigned: George Cretekos, Mayor Approved as to Form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2013, by He is [ ] personally known to me or has [ ] produced as identification. Notary Public 21 Print Name: My Commission Expires: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2013, by WILLIAM B. HORNE, II, as City Manager of the City of Clearwater, Florida, who is [] personally known to me or who has [] produced as identification. Notary Public Print Name: My Commission Expires: 22 4660336v1 rl�l ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 /32" = 1'-0" AUG. 30, 2013 SUMBITTAL FOR DVA w' ' �; �� Ct � j@ S t f., b c� n �SSOCIs'��'S TED LENART AND MARIA LENART, �;,' � � � F„� .t� �„ f TRUSTEES OF LENART FAMILY TRUST UTD o� � � � ` SHEET � 0 625 Gulfview Blvd. �� Clearwater Beach, FL Q� �.01 a GENERAL NOTES: O GARAGE IS AN OPEN GARAGE WITH 20% OPEN gO 10'-0" MINIMUM SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE KEY NOTES: 1O PAINTED STUCCO TYP. O2 DECORATIVESTUCCO,PAINTED O PAINTED ALUMINUM FRAMES- NO GLAZING TYP. @ PARKING GARAGE O4 ALUMINUM TRELLIS O5 CONCRETE FLAT TILE ROOF O6 ALUMINUM CANOPY O7 GLAZING TYP. OS SLIDING GLASS DOOR O9 SPANDREL GLA55 FALSE WINDOW 10 ALUMINUM PICKET RAIL 11 PARKING GARAGE ENTRY 12 FUTURE HAMPTON INN 13 FUTURE SHEPHARD'S 14 STUCCO TRIM BAND 15 DECORATNE BRACKET, TRIM COLOR. ------�� =====7= \� I � I � I � I � I � I �_1_�\ PercenW eofArchiteauralDeconNonPerElewtian Total Square Total Square Footage o( Percentage ot Elevation As BuildingElevation Footage Shown on Architectural Demration/ Architectual Decorotian/ Elevation Windows Windows North 10,661 6,773 fi3.53% East 18,453 i1,OB0 60.04% South 10,557 6,710 63.56% West 18,398 11,533 62.69% '•Architec[urel Deroration and windows indudes: Glazing, sliding glass doors and non-glazed window openings with their respec[ive trim pieces; Awnings, Trim Bands, 7rell ises, Standing Seam Me[al roofs, Decora[ive Hoof and Awning Bred�ets, Decorative Mechaniwl Endosure, Decoative Metal Screens, louvered Openings, Bahama Shutters, Decorative Stucw and eal<ony Railin s. NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" I i Mio aoiHr ornansnnn —�""�_ . 9J' 0" ' T.O. ROOF SLABI I II �86 a � � tOTH ROOft II �,b,e.. I I 9TH FLOOR I � II f°T � I I 8TH FLOOR �� 57' 4 ]TNfL00R � �Z �� F�. B.. � � 6TM FLOOR I I �� FlT 8 I I STH FLOOk �� F28' C � � 4TH FLOOR I I �� 19-8' FJXD iLOpi I � �� Fia e� � � ]ND FLOOR I � 5.6.• . .____ � ___._" ________.. B.f.E..11'VE I I FO' m FIRST FLOOR (.T-6" SITE ELEV) � '�� ...____ . .______ . ....___. � � � I „■ ■„I IIIIII��^iIIlPllf� �IlNlllli_ililNlf i�e� ■��i IIIIIU illlllhl, II111111U-il;llflb ❑0 � //�—_— ii � �� C / _ _ _ _ I—_ I � I I � � � � � 13 � � � � r = — � L —_—__ � I � ir______ � �_____ . � � AUG. 30, 2013 SUMBITTAL FOR DVA ..� °°-� � ° � � � � � �, � t � � a � ��,,� �15SQCt��E?`S TED LENART AND MARIA LENART, � � ' �I > " �- � TRUSTEES OF LENART FAMILY TRUST UTD a '�� E }�� < �A: � o° W ��! �F�i��'�"�i��i�l. A20.01 a 0 625 Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater Beach, FL GENERAL NOTES: , O GAR4GE IS AN OPEN GARAGE WITH 20% OPEN Og 10'-0" MINIMUM SEfBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE KEY NOTES: O7 PAINTED STUCCO TYP. OZ DECOR4TIVE STUCCO, PAINTED O3 PAINTED ALUMINUM FRAMES- NO GLAZING TYP. @ PARKING GARAGE O4 ALUMINUM TRELLIS OS CONCREfE FLAT TILE ROOF O6 ALUMINUM CANOPY O7 GLAZING TYP. O8 SLIDING GLA55 DOOR O9 SPANDREL GLA55 FALSE WINDOW 10 ALUMINUM PICKET RAIL 11 PARKING GARAGE ENTRY 12 FUTURE HAMPTON INN 13 FUTURE SHEPHARD'S 14 STUCCO TRIM BAND 15 DECORATIVE BRACKEf, TRIM COLOR. EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 0 � 11 't �� 1�i 11 '1 �� ■�,I I„ � 111111�111��=�IIII11 II'llllll�U�-tllllllll IIIP�III IIIIIIIU_=�I IIV�III IIIIIPJ ■,.I I,� �� IIIIIIIII_IIIIIIII II'lllllflo_,�IIIIIIIII, IllfllllllllllU=�11IIII'lIIIIllllq �I I„ ■._ II��II��U-1��lil� ��,.III��II��i-n��l��lll I�I��I��III��I-'I��IIi�.�l��ll�lll� ' � . __ ___...... � _ ' � O � ... , _ ........ . � � i � _.. .,_ _,,..._. i � - -� l�J 86'-f 10TH F100R �b-e• vm noou 6T P BTX FLOqf ST 4" 71H ROOR �'-a' brH rtoort lT C STH FLOOR 18-8' 4iH ROOR 19' !'. 3RD FLOOR is me-. zNO �oox 5'_6'. B.F.E. .il VE �' P FlRST FLOOR (�T-6'SITE EIFV) AUG. 30, 2013 SUMBITTAL FOR DVA .�' �� 1 t1 t i£' 5� E' k7 � ii ^� /aS5C7C3r��E'S TED LENART AND MARIA LENART, �� = ' � �� ' � � �� TRUSTEES OF LENART FAMILY TRUST UTD o� � �� % �' ` SHEET < . ,.. 0 0 625 Gulfview Blvd. �� Clearwater Beach, FL A2�.�2a GENERAL NOTES: O GARAGE IS AN OPEN GARAGE WITH 20% OPEN Og 10'•0" MINIMUM SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE KEY NOTES: iO PAINTED STUCCO TYP. O2 DECORATIVE STUCCO, PAINTED �3 PAINTED ALUMINUM FRAMES-NO GLAZING TYP. @ PARKING GARAGE O ALUMINUM TRELLIS OS CONCRETE FLAT TfLE ROOF O6 ALUMINUM CANOPY O7 GLAZING TYP. �8 SLIDING GLASS DOOR O9 SPANDREL GLASS FALSE WINDOW 10 ALUMINUM PICKET R41L 11 PARKING GAR4GE ENTRY 12 FUTURE HAMPTON INN 13 FUTURE SHEPHARD'S 14 STUCCO TRIM BAND 15 DECORATIVE BRACKEf, TRIM COLOR. Pertenbge o/Mhitectunl Decontion PerElevatian Total 5quare Tatal 5quare Footage of Pertentage W Elevation As Building Elevation Footage Shown on Ar hitectural Dewration/ Architectural Demration/ Elevation Windows Windows Narth 10,661 6,773 6i.53% East 18,453 11,080 60.04% South 10,557 6,730 G3.56% West 18,398 11,533 62.69% ••Architectural Decoration and windows indudes: Glazing, sliding glass doon and non-glazed wlndow openings wilh their respective trim pieces; Awnings, Tnm Bands, Trellises, Standing Seam Metal roofs, Dewrative Roof and Awning Bradcets, Deroretive Mechanipl Enclosure, Decontive Metal Saeens, Louvered Openings, Bahama Shutters, Demrative Stuao and Balcony Railin s. SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /32" = 1'-0" i � i �/=i = I I � I � I � I � ��_L_� (�7-6 SITE ELEV� AUG. 30, 2013 SUMBITfAL FOR DVA ° ° ��„ � ��: c� a � � � � � � �, � � � �SSt�Cir'��'S TED LENART AND MARIA LENART, �' � � � r �. " ° � 5 ' TRUSTEES OF LENART FAMILY TRUST UTD a � � �� h � � �:� � "� < . < : �° W �'�� A20.03a 0 625 Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater Beach, FL � GENERAL NOTES� O GARAGE IS AN OPEN GARAGE WITH 20% OPEN Og 10'-0" MINIMUM SETBACKS FROM PROPERN LINE KEY NOTES: iO PAINTEDSTUCCO TYP. O2 DECORATIVESTUCCO,PAINTED O PAINTED ALUMINUM FRAMES- NO GLAZING TYP. @ PARKING GARAGE O ALUMINUM TRELLIS OS CONCRETE FLAT TILE ROOF O6 ALUMINUM CANOPY O7 GLAZING TYP. O8 SLIDING GLA55 DOOR O9 SPANDREL GLASS FALSE WINDOW 10 ALUMINUM PICKET RAIL 11 PARKING GARAGE ENTRY 12 FUTURE HAMPTON INN 13 FUTURE SHEPHARD'S 14 STUCCO TRIM BAND 15 DECORATIVE BRACKET, TRIM COLOR. WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/32�� - ��'Oj1 (�T-6"SITEELEV) AUG. 30, 2013 SUMBITTAL FOR DVA rv��—�� t1 t �� S t�., �3 d tl AS5t7C1r'��@S � ry� � : TED LENART AND MARIA LENART, � �' � : ' � ��' �� 'E � TRUSTEES OF LENART FAMILY TRUST UTD w ��. " �� ' � 4a� SHEET � 0 625 Gulfview Blvd. �� -�� Clearwater Beach, FL Q2�. 04a MAXIMUM BUILDING ENVELOPE 45' TO 100' WITHIN SETBACKS/PROPERTY LINE _ ALLOWABLE BUILDING ENVELOPE ABOVE 45' =1,208,625 C.F. x.70 = PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE ABOVE 45' _ ""NOTE: ONLY MAIN BUILDING MASS TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION, CANOPIES Q SHADE STRUCTURES AND BALCONIES NOT INCLUDED. 1,208,625 CUBIC FEET 846,038 CUBIC FEET 665,727 CUBIC FEET 55.1% OF THEORETICAL BUILDING ENVELOPE NORTH / SOUTH AXIS EAST / WEST AXIS BUILDING ENVELOPE AUG. 30, 2013 SUMBITTAL FOR DVA � S a tl � 1 E? S t E' �7 c� it k /-�SSQC1a��'S � TED LENART AND MARIA LENART, � � �' � �� - � = E �� = f � �� _ � TRUSTEES OF LENART FAMILY TRUST UTD a � �� '.�� ` �� SHEET � 0 625 Gulfview Blvd. �� Clearwater Beach, FL Q2�.05a ' � � ,, �. �, � a� - �� .,,�� . � � �' �',. �.,'`` ; r �� „° � � ` ,� � ,,,,p��: ,� , � �� ,,, �'; ��e.��..:�,��= � ; � ; g,.,�� ; � � � �� :. � � _ ,... ,3ii � / , � ' � � � a y� � � /, �_. _ �.... � , � � � ��,, �°�. ; ii/i%j� � � 6 z �%� ... .�� .. �. � +` � �� 1 ... .. � .... . � . . ... .. .. � � \ � � .. � �5 £ � ; �j/ % _% � .. �'. ��. � �� rr �1 '�i �� ,, ..« .'" "' I�t,1/� �f� !�( III !i° 1, E �� A' (�I {M� I!� I�I � iE€ 1 li_€ 1,s 1 r (N[ �1� I/I , 11, , / � ��. .. �� .. d� y. .._ x.� ... � �� [ !I� F. � � � " �l �1 (�� U� !M� . �F �r€ iM� i�i j� �� ' �i� #� . •r'• � � 'M� �� jMl IMt !�� s"° f� %` �' � �� ////� � d �/�/ i y� �%/i� �iy� ��;. 9 �� ;' I�� Mi s� ; "'� �� (�� ( ` A i�� (�� o s�z I�:� „f �� -. `�l I!� .; „� � � �� ., , n� ,�� e3 �1M ��il'��`,., � �� r i�f �; .�+, �� ;�� 8� : � �b ` � r�� .� ' �� "` NE AERIAL FOR MASSING STUDY AUG. 30, 2013 SUMBITTAL FOR DVA � �;:;S�ilti�S��.'baCl �:� �sso�iates �,:� � TED LENART AND MARIA LENART, '��" �� } � t TRUSTEES OF LENART FAMILY TRUST UTD � �'° . <.` ` " ' ` � w SHEET 0 0 625 Gulfview Blvd. �� -�� Clearwater Beach, FL Q20. 06a ,,,, �„ � � � � „� ,�s„ ,, . �.., , ; � � , � `��,� �q�� ",'�;� ,,. �«>,, , ,. � � •�'. �°` d„. a .,v �� '� � �� .3 � � � � s€ � ��€ ' 6 z E �� . � �9�f t �� .. �� e �� , � a .E � i� �� , �E �� / �_ f ,, � � �' I� � E��,,� ��" �� a� In <, � � �� ' i' '� ii �� `Ii , �� " �� `li �� ?ii 3 �,' � �� t, N !i 1� 1� ;�I I�� I�� I R �i (� �� ' 't r, , i r � � . � N! i ;; ��I !1i ,. ;�i t � � � �� ' � �� . � �� ` ��:, ��.'� � � � � � ' �` � ��' 4� �° ��'_ �� « N�i MF �� % fMl ��;�� ' tM+ ' �� ; �l _. �� it �� SW AERIAL FOR MASSING STUDY �s>i� ,�a....� �:. .', � � ��` � . ` � %///nz; % }% ��:� � � ',��l,i.,'�. �, ii//�i, ............ ..... , �i AUG. 30, 2013 SUMBITTAL FOR DVA � � � � � � � � t � � � � � /-��St3Ct c�tE'S ��• � F.:�� TED LENART AND MARIA LENART, ,� a<Y�: = 3, � TRUSTEES OF LENART FAMILY TRUST UTD w �� , ' `" 0 �W �..'��i �� ,,.1�L� . SHEET 0 625 Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater Beach, FL A20. 07a LEGAL DESCRIPTION: L07S 6 AND ], 9LOCN C, BAYSI�E SUBDIVISION N0. 5, ACCORDING TO 111E PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PUT BOOK 39, PAGES 3B AND 39. OF 7HE PUBUC RECORDS Of PINELLAS COUNTY, FL�RIDA. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA LEGEND w.ro u`k""m:w�.w � „ � . a:u � � � � u.a.a � � P �« :aE ��a maK«e�c a.� • c�wo�� BEN[n uaw o coNCnErt M vpE IY/ I Muuaw o wm � w^^^ a. wcrzn svarO caunFrz m' s'�'��mczrN ��a R�= � � � � �� a; �; �� BOUNDARY AN� TOPO NOTES I. AS PEfl ME �EOERAL EMEPCENCY MRNAGEMENT AGENCY (fEMR) ROW INAIRANCE NAIE MAF (FlRM) NUMBEH �2103COIO�C, CdAMUNItt NUYBER �25096, PANEL 010I, SUfFI% C, EiFEC11YF DAIE OF SEPIEMBER J, 200], TIE AB04E-0ESCPIBEO PROPEFTY APPEARS i0 BE M 20NE RE 1N1H A BASE ROW ElFVATON Of i3 fEEi RN� ZONE YE, COASiAL ROOD MM �ElOptt HA2RR� (WAK ACTON), HANNG BASE R000 ELEV�TaNS OF I] FEEi ANO 16 FEET. f. tt00p ZONE PEMNEIERS SHONN NEREIXJ NERE TAKEN FRq,I PINELLAS COUNiY piIRM (DIqTAL F1000 INSURANCE flAIE MAP) RNO ARE i0 BE CONAOERED APPRO%14AiE M LOCA�ION. 3. FORIY-EIQIT (4B) MWRS BEfORE DICCINC, BORINC, PILE-�RINNC, PLANTNG ETC. CALL SUNSHME SiAIE ONE CRLL 5�'SRL, �-EQO-1J2-4)]0 50 111At UNOERGFWNO 11iIlITES MAT BE fIELD SPOTlEO. 4. ELEV1Tp15 SMONN MEREdI REFER TO ME NOR111 AMEFiCAN �ERIICAL �ANM Of 19E0 (NAVD 90). 5. BENCHMAFK USEO WAS 'LP 10 I RHO" IpCATE� iN lOP OF SOUT1WESi EN� OF SFA WALL RROUN� CLEMWRiER HARBIXi, ]l FEEi EASL OF CENIER4NE OF CORONA00 DflIVE, 10.3 fEEi NIXiM OF CONCIiFIE PONER POIE NUMBER ]5-�65, HANNC A PUBLISHE�O AmOJUS N� ELEV4Tq1 OF ].8t FEEL (N�Vp 98). M�OFIAATON BiAiNE� OM L E NGS DRiA SNEET, P1� AC�19). 6. PpPCEL ID 11-29-15-D50��-Op3-0060 � ZONING�TOURIST s.``� ✓ �\. /� � � � \•� � .. / ~`�� ..r`,� e � �ti.�.«m� � ._� , � . � �\ . / ZONING:TOUR�ST � � � / � ��s' 5.9�� q/ �:/ � ,5 1 � 33' / a� B �6. � � .. �j -%`, `I e . " ' 1 �a. ..» �% �� m/ I ZONING:TOURIST !~`° / � / `.�� /� v�� ` �. . � ��ti±��'J.SJ' ( I'� / ' / ��, C' J� / r I � I � 5' c�� 10• ��J ra l�`�e� 1 7 / �, `, ' �' aw I I � =j �� ./-. _]- / , ///1 s,15. ZONING:TOURIST � �"1 �,L / . j FUTURELANDUSE:RFH�P f� / / � / �� .a�� I �. \ �� / / I r�; / . `\\ I _� . . ��r1.� / J � A` j � \ av � ! Y ` \ / / ZONING:OS/A `\ / � � �LENART FAMILY TRUST azs cuu'viex e�w. CLFAFW4iER. L J3�6� "I1>-�O6-J<Op E%T 1JJ . .'\ ' George F. Young, Inc:=/°, � ��n,��.�.-;n.��;,s;:�,�:;n � �,�,,.�.��: �� "`"�`.,.w:,'a a LANO USE DATA N w V ` �� io fcVE f • M �.. - ` FOTEI, 'JN CLEARWATER BEACH 1301�5300SC Exisrinc SITE PLAN � TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR GULFVIEW HOTEL #625 S. GULFVIEW BLVD. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: LENART FAMILY TRUST PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. AUGUST 2013 PROJECT # 13-040 Robert Pergoli zi, CP/PTP AICP #9023 / PTP # 133 I. INTRODUCTION The applicant is proposing to redevelop their property on Clearwater Beach into a 105 room resort hotel. (See Figure 1) The proposal is for complete redevelopment with the new hotel to be constructed where there is currently a 64 room Econolodge motel at # 625 S. Gulfview Boulevard. The redevelopment of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment in the Tourist "T" zoning district. This application requires an assessment of the traffic impacts of development. Prior to completing this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. II. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The property has frontage on S. Gulfview Boulevard Drive east of Bayway Boulevard. South Gulfview Boulevard was reconstructed as a two-lane collector roadway with on-street parking running along Clearwater Beach. Coronado Drive was reconstructed as a three-lane collector roadway with on-street parking. Hamden Drive intersects with S. Gulfview Boulevard at a signalized intersection. The segment of S. Gulfview Boulevard between Hamden Drive and the Clearwater Pass Bridge is three lanes. Per the approved methodology traffic counts that were conducted on June 21, 2012 at the following intersections during the weekday PM peak period of 4-6 PM were used s a basis for this study: S. Gulfview Blvd. / Hamden Drive S. Gulfview Blvd. / Coronado Drive Coronado Drive / Hamden Drive All traffic counts were converted to annual average equivalents using FDOT seasonal adjustment factors. Existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Existing intersections were analyzed using the HCS+ and SYNCHRO software. The count data, HCS+ and SYNCHRO printouts are included in Appendix A. Presently the signalized intersection at S. Gulfview Boulevard / Coronado Drive operates at LOS A with average delay being 6.6 seconds per vehicle and an intersection capacity utilization (ICU) of 42.5%. Presently the signalized intersection at S. Gulfview Boulevard / Hamden Drive operates at LOS A with average delay being 5.7 seconds per vehicle with ICU of 41.8%. At the intersection of Hamden Drive / Coronado Drive the primary movements are eastbound-to-southbound and northbound-to-westbound, whereas the southbound approach (Hamden Drive) is stop controlled. The HCS+ analysis shows the primary movements operate at LOS A with delay of 8.2 seconds per 1 � � f J- - — z � � �,�-_� �. �- { " f � ,�� ,..� � ' � . �' # � `+� yr.. a , ��', �� r � ' ' , �� . ' �b K'.� o l�a!' ,G,'��h`'�� M' '� � ¢s+�. �� a ..r^4 t�^�` ��'�` � � ��' {��•�� v,,�' m�i��,��`�� t�� .yF�ii.,::. '''�-e .`e` :r, i.�.,a � `� i i— .r'�a E < � �( -- �r, :-.�,. ��. -�-�_� �' #�� ,,,,{ � '�, ._,�k ��,s:�:� i��'J`;��,.�,��+� �f'` � � �� Ti '---i_f4 ,i�i � .. ,�.,,��?; +?r� r ,� �. ,� , s� � w �� 4 c i �Fl� , , � 5`�'�» � �p.;��°,�a.l��E�.9 � �.�� " ' ., . t» ? � . .r -. � � i �, � -w � I �� . .�, . �.'� �� ,. .r �� G� � � { ,�� p .. � . 1 , �-, � � ;:, � � . a �ti; � � t, '','e'v- r ;: u -_ , �'�. a�� {'# .a �a� � . t� � i � f �' � r ' 1� f r� � , � i �' �+' �• �� .� %� � - • 1 i r � R l `� , r� j l ��' f��.,,� :�'�?�� t� k �� , x �'d� `' �w:< , � rr� . . � ' ` �F �� -." ds � � � �� 5 4 �� ;� . _ ,. .. . . �� I ifi .#3 '�tL ,x _.,„ � � j �� ` � �y � � ui�#1��11i�`�f�iii� � � � �� , ��`` `� F � � '�.11 � y ' � , � �'9 „ �: T �o . � `� � j.�,� t , �� u . �� .�y,yy� � � � .....�...r�—, ' '°°-. . �� _�,� t rl � `��L . �'"`'�v r� ��UI'el1AA�4�lR�l� �+q lll�!-y ' '+.' �� . t �`� t' � �#� �4 �, r ��r � ; y � �o� � �`�n�'� !r� �� P F„-; � . , .l1„�. �` 4`"��;� � s � ��. � �jX! i �� . � _ �� ' � i . . � � i,R i � • f� �, / � � �� : � S d� � 7 � .. � � � . � r � 3 .,� a� � �X ��l�� -� �i. f�� .�1� �p�yj � y w o ' fl � �� ce�, a� �� " � �,�,° q, �� !�} f� X L�,� ,.7 i '� ��7 f°`i,��, ,� � � `r i" vq�l` �l ► � '��.�( je �,/ r �i i'�.1� � s`,t��r+` `r ��'� �� . ��.Cf.+�. �Y'{1.i T 'J -�,�� .Y . .9°,M � '•-' la � • t ��, '� � +i.a.e. �,. : t� +r �� e ,.. � � � `��*.�'#�/'� i � ,�� t � rt r n �� ` . . . � �, � v ,y � � %� ��`��1��-'i��. �'�i�` ��, �- C,,;_ � a�, � � � � � �. ' �'Qt�jil-� �� r'' 61`.��j, _'��F.��.r� Ri- �+�#- !��, t � ;.ri��.�'�/"�Sr� }4,,�� f�'��.. ' ' ,�,l�`�, E �,' � ' ' fi � �; y I : � �' '"�`'� 4 �4, � f`�� ` j �� / i � •� y �� . \ ��. :�': � ~� �'��"r�� '�° J�`� � :� � :� �k' � �, - ��°� -�r a,.,�1,¢ '�°`"��`,��.�� rt� ,•"' • .,, . . . � � � �' t'�Z � o � : . .,.. ... ,, � i:K's �- ' ...: � ., . :A�. -- \ d��l,� �'x'�� ,�� : � . �.�,' -� y%v � , � trE- , f �..a ;;�,K �'�L `a..� � �t.��t�' .,�i ,. �. -t \~.9' .� ?� `.� ! ' .��,,i� � yi�L.Lr� � a �~��.��ca1L�i"��iAk��U�{'r , � � - �g y r 1 J � a¢ ` � � '�' b , � �4� /c `� ^�°."f�l�� Ya�,�j - � �� K ,+.q•at,a -� -..: ` ��6 '1 � h� � :_� ��`� }� ., �� - �� i � �'��t �� I � c �� .�=:-"' "� .s�;} -�� ,t, w,, .'s'��' �'` �� "�i ' / �a .`�19i1 }�.r- ' � ��"`�`-` � , � �. C;, , '��,� 'i � �i tk i� � y\�,,.�� r v.` `�:» � � - �.-�"�►��-.� �>+�``�y,".i:.� - v. -F �� fi.�A .l� .�ql. -1��.� :_,�„s��.. �m.-y��°`.. .�. :� � : .. aS, � ,� i ' + 'z.n � ° �/� � ��' . ..�r� � • � _ . � � �� l aw .er�'r{"e'e`s,tf '�fa4 �e,��,�� t � . . v - S tC � � � � _ r. . `, � , . ) i I :� 1 ��,,..a 'd Y � �� !t ` � }�� (�: . ��i� .y �� i� �"y� � � - $ P W ' \ �. ��...,�(, �a �.Y,i # e-�.�r - �� ., , _ .. , .:, ._ + . . w. ' F �. .. � � �s - g "'�, � ,.�„ � � :a .� � • ��R^„y� ''- �, j� �'� �� , � . �'` `'� � )' ,... i. � - ..,�a : i� s `i� €' ,v ..` �� , � � �. 2� ��,��, � �� y. -�� e,' ?�a r •� ��# *��' `�� . � i r:,�. �� :.f °�.' '_... ; '� �,, .. � ` � W „ . . ` .�, > "� � � ��i�s - . �" 1\ ' ;�'" � �� . . p{ � {� � � S � �S �i / .� �,��a � � ' � �� ;6 r ,�� . �° � � � r �-�' �! s u � , � . �, , . . , � �_� ' . � , ` �yt .f ' % ` °' .s -v' � _ .� A - � �� 4 „ ,..: .n..: . �. a � a ..z. .r.. , .a . .. , � . . �-.:. .. . a. . � _ , . , ".rv' . . _. 1 � _ � Y. � ...` x ' ' � �. : �� . . . _- �, � . . . � r.a.. .>_ . . . . � _. �� . -' ta � 1.:�� . .. . i .� . � , �.�.,. .,. 1 . ' �� .. . . , . ...... �; k ��_` .. . � ^_ s ., . ! �. . ','- .. � °; : � � . . �, ..' " 1!j w�', .,� .^ _. . _ .. � . � . . " � s,r . -- —'—'- ..-s�.. �Y ,, � � Y � �� / , � � �l� ry F � � T PROJECT NO: 1�, �, V Y'V 1V 1 3-040 DATE: FIGURE: Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. �� Land Development Consulting 8/ 2 01 3 ,�� ENGIIVEERING TRANSPORTATION PLANNAIG PERMiTI'ING �� 13325 ICOT BLYD., SUITE 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 D�WN BY' Phone: (727) 524-1818 FaY: (727) 524-6090 � www.gulfcoastconsultinginc.com � K C J �lf o� � DEVON DR. � Wa O � nnrr_u�r�x�n�rcn r�v 732 VPH TWO—WAY (355 NB, 377 SB) _�, a�j BLVD s63 ti O = TRAFFIC SIGNAL ■ ■ PROJECT SITE # 625--- ; . EXISTING PEAK I-�OLJR TRA�'FIC �... .. ,. , DATE: ' Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. �� +�� Lanfl vevelopment consutting 8� 2 013 � � ENGR�tQiG TRANSPOBTATION PLANd@IG PE6DIIITIlVG � 13825 ICOT BLVD., SUITE 605 Cleazwater, Florida 33760 DRAWN BY: Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fac: (727) 524-6090 �..o �lf�oast�ons,�ltingin�.�om M K C N PROJECT NO: 13-040 FIGURE: vehicle and the southbound stop-controlled movements operate at LOS C with delay of 16.6 seconds per vehicle. South Gulfview Boulevard functions as collector roadway and according to FDOT 2009 OLOS Handbook capacity tables has a LOS D capacity of 1,440 vehicles per hour on the undivided segment. The segment of Gulfview Boulevard east of Hamden Drive and Coronado Drive are both three-lane collector roads with a LOS D capacity of 1,520 vehicles per hour. The existing PM peak hour LOS for areas roadway segments is shown below: EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS (2013) PM Peak LOS D Roadwa�Segment Lanes Volume Capacity LOS S. Gulfview (E. of Bayway) 3-lanes 878 1520 B S. Gulfview (Bywy-Hmdn) 3-lanes 1080 1520 C S. Gulview (Hamden -Sth) 2LU 493 1440 B S. Gulfview (Sth — Coronado)2LU 611 1440 B Coronado (Hamden — Sth) 2LD 650 1520 B Coronado (Devon Dr - S. Gulfview) 2LD 967 1520 C Coronado (Gulfview to Roundabout) 4LD 1556 2900 C Hamden (S. Gulfview-Coronado) 2LD 732 1520 B Hamden (N of. Coronado) 2LU 96 1040 B Presently all roadway segments operate at LOS C or better. III. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing traffic was adjusted by a 2% annual growth rate to the expected build-out year of 2017 to account for background traffic from other nearby redevelopment projects. In addition, traffic from the proposed Clearwater Resort hotel complex was added, traffic from the proposed Hampton Inn at #655 Gulfview was added, traffic from the proposed Clearwater Beach Resort hotel at the corner of S. Gulfview and Coronado was added, and traffic from the Sea Captain redevelopment at #40 Devon Drive was added as background traffic. Background traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3. The site will be developed as an 105 room resort hotel with associated parking and amenities. Using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 9th Edition rates, the amount of new trips was calculated and estimates are shown below: TRIP GENER.ATION ESTIMATES Land Use Amount Daily Trips PM Peak Trips Resort Hotel 105 Rooms 858 52 (22/30) 2 O = TRAFFIC SI( BACKGROIJND I'EAK HOLJR TRAF�'IC (201'7) 13�040� DATE: FIGURE: � Gulf Coast Consulti.ng, Inc. ��► Land Development Consulting 8� 2 013 Q 1�� FNGINE�BING TRANSPOBTATION YI.AIVNING PSRMIITAIG �� 13825 ICOT BLVD., SUITE 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 DRAWN BY: Phone: (727)524-1818 Fax: (727)524-6090 �..��o$s�ons��.�om M K C The vehicular access will be taken from S. Gulfview Boulevard. Project traffic was distributed to the roadways based on the following percentages, and is shown in Figure 4. 60% to / from the north (31) 40% to / from the south (21) PROJECT IMPACT CALCULATIONS Project Road Segment Lanes Project Trips Capacitv Percent S. Gulfview (E. of— Site ) 3-lanes 21 1520 1.38% S. Gulfview (W. of SiteO 3-lanes 31 1520 2.04% Coronado (Hamden — S. Gulfview) 2LD 18 1520 1.18% Coronado (Gulfview — Roundabout) 4LD 31 2900 1.06% Hamden (Gulfview — Coronado) 2LD 18 1520 1.18% Project traffic impacts will be primarily to Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive. All intersections, roadway segments and project driveways were analyzed for future conditions. Future traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5, and the SYNCHRO and HCS+ printouts are included in Appendix B. The signalized intersection at S. Gulfview Boulevard / Coronado Drive would continue to operate at LOS A with average delay of 7.1 seconds per vehicle and an intersection capacity utilization (ICU) of 53.5%. The signalized intersection at S. Gulfview Boulevard / Hamden Drive would continue to operate at LOS A with average delay being 6.9 seconds per vehicle with ICU of 48.0%. At the intersection of Hamden Drive / Coronado Drive, the HCS analysis shows the primary movements operate at LOS A with delay of 8.5 seconds per vehicle and the southbound stop-controlled movements operate at LOS D with delay of 27.3 seconds per vehicle. At the project driveway to S. Gulfview Boulevard, the westbound left turns entering the site would operate at LOS A with average delay of 9.0 seconds per vehicle, and the northbound approach exiting the site would operate at LOS C with average delay of 24.4 seconds per vehicle. Future roadway segment conditions with the project impacts are shown below: 3 Q � a CA � W �, � w a � C7 � � � N PROJECT TRAFFIC DIS'TRIBLTTION PROJECTNO: 13-040 � �� DATE: FIGURE: � : � � �� Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. �► Land Development Con.sulting 8� 2 013 � `w�+� EN@�BING TR6NSPOBTATTON PLAM�iG PERbI1TTIlVG 13825 ICOT BLVD., SUITE 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 DRAWN BY: Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 www.gulfcoastconsultinginc.com M K C W L7 Q � � � � d a �f o� � � DEVON DR. � Wa O � e = TRAFFIC SIGNAL BDT(?LTT\II A TL'D TD 1026 VPH TWO–WAY (492 NB, 534 SB) � p,� BLVD p,A — 573 �g VI� — � I I 13�� ao N ■ ■ TOTAL P�AK I�OLJI� TRAFFIC ( 201'7 ) DATE: �� `" F„�' Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. ,�� `' Land nevelopment consulting 8/ 2 0 1 3 ENGIlVEOIING TRANSPOHTATION PI,ANNll�1G PERMITTIlVG �� 13825 ICOT BLVD., SUITE 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 D�iWN BY: Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fac: (727) 524-6090 .�.�,.w.��oaB�ons��.�m M K C N PROJECT NO: 13-040 FIGURE: FUTURE ROADWAY CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT PM Peak LOS D Roadwa ��Se�ment Lanes Volume Capacitv LOS S. Gulfview (E of Site) 3-lanes 1212 1520 C S. Gulfview (Bywy- Hmdn) 3-lanes 1435 1520 D S. Gulview (Hamden -Sth) 2LU 570 1440 B S. Gulfview (Sth — Coronado) 2LU 718 1440 B Coronado (Hamden — Sth) 2LD 858 1520 B Coronado (Devon. - Gulfview) 2LD 1468 1520 D Coronado (Gulfview to Roundabout) 4LD 2164 2900 C Hamden (S. Gulfview-Coronado) 2LD 1026 1520 C Hamden (N. of Coronado) 2LU 182 1040 B All roadway segments would continue to operate at LOS D or better. With background traffic from other nearby projects and the proposed Gulfview Hotel redevelopment, operations on the segment of Coronado Drive between Devon Drive and S. Gulfview Boulevard, and the segment of S. Gulfview Boulevard between Bayway and Hamden Drive would drop from LOS C to LOS D which is acceptable. I �+��K��i��s1]�i This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff. The project will generate 858 daily trips and 52 PM peak hour trips. This analysis demonstrates traffic operations at nearby intersections and on adjacent roadways would continue at acceptable levels of service with or without the project impacts. � Robert Pergolizzi From: Robert Pergolizzi Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 2:04 PM To: himanshu.patni@MyClearwater.com Cc: Katie Cole (kcole@hwhlaw.com) Subject: GUlfview Hotel - TIS Dear Himanshu — I just got approval to proceed with the Traffic Impact Study (TIS). This email is to confirm our telephone conversation of July 25 regarding the methodology for the TIS for this redevelopment at #625 S. Gulfview Blvd. We will use previously conducted PM peak period traffic counts from the following intersections: S. Gulfview Blvd. / Hamden Dr. S. Gulfview Blvd / Coronado Dr. Coronado Dr / Hamden Dr. The intersections analysis will consider as background traffic the total traffic from the Sea Captain TIS we recently completed in April 2013. Therefore, all approved projects to date will be considered as background traffic. Project traffic for the proposed 105 room redevelopment will be based on ITE Trip generation, 9th Edition. We calculated 858 daily trips of which 52 would occur during the weekday PM peak hour. Project traffic will be added to background traffic and these intersections will be reanalyzed. The project driveways will be analyzed too. Roadways segment conditions will be analyzed for S. Gulfview Blvd. from Coronado Drive to the Sand Key Bridge, Coronado Drive will be analyzed from Hamden Drive to the roundabout, and Hamden Drive will be analyzed as well. A Traffic Impact Study will be submitted with the application. I trust this accurately reflects our conversation, let me know if you need anything else. Robert Pergolizzi, AICP PTP Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: 727-524-1818 Fax: 727-524-6090 Cell: 727-644-2695 Email: per�o@gulfcoastconsultin�inc.com Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCATION: Coronado Dr -- S Guifview Blvd CITYISTATE: Ciearwater Beach FL 758 783 , �� *� 319 439 0 .� i 4 319 F 275 .} t 0 f• 0 o � 0.91 F o 2B6 .i 11 � r o.► o Method for determining peak hour: Totai Enfering Volume QC JOB #: 10778501 DATE: Thu Jun 21 2012 Peak-Hour: 4:45 PM -- 5:45 PM o.s �.o Peak 15-Min: 5:30 PM -- 5:45 PM �F t �.s o.z o.o �.� a �. 1.9 f25 J��t O.Of•0.0 � 0o t '!�;:� a o.a �t�r h t (� - 2.4 �M o.0 i� " C o.0 �! 0.0 h t t' 0 508 0 • a t� ��1«��.!'��' ��3'U'�1"�'� o.o o.z o.o 450 506 -1? :;��I;.¢.U?` "4'IC�i:.: :r.5`.� � i� 4 � C`_�::.t�E_i:r`�n, ._,.a'�'-=`-' 02 02 � � � �� 17 �'��114 ri � � � � i � � NA J t 4 « t _�i?4,: L « NA �► ?'�'_ � NA ��. �► '3 C �► h t f' �a NA * � � � � 1 1 1 � � 0 0 0 .� i 4 0 S�L o 0 �► U�J 4• 0 � 0 i I t' 0 'ti 4 (� � 0 2 0 � Tr� � NA � .j i 4 � ��I1,. � NA � �� 1. NA � C h f (' � NA � R" = RTOR Min Count Coronado Dr Coronado Dr S Gulfview Blvd S Gulfview Blvd Period (Northbound) Southbound) Eastbound) (Westbound) Hourly 3inning At Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R"` Total ToEals 4:00 PM 0 122 0 0 0 0 115 84 0 0 76 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 401 4:15 PM 0 121 0 0 0 0 94 68 0 0 61 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 345 4:30 PM 0 119 D 0 0 0 107 82 _ 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 379 5:45 PM 0 111 0 0 �� .�i �93 �� z�� 1 E —� E� p� � p St3 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 Pedestrians 16 Bicycles 0 i 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/26/2012 12:06 PM 0 107 60 0 0 1 69 0 0 0 4 0 D 0 0 4 0 0 12. 0 0 0 0 0 � D 0 0 0 0 I 353 I 1 0 0 D 104 0 0 0 Total 1704 8 132 1 SOURCE: Quafity Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCATION: S Hamden Dr -- S Gulfview Bivd CITY/STATE: Clearwater Beach FL 352 347 �a t� 20 0 332 � i 4 226 1E 39 � !. 308 f. 514 226 A 0.94: M 206 265 �i 0 : i 0�► 558 Method for determining peak hour: Toial Entering Volume QC JOB #: 10778505 ' DATE: Thu. Jun 21 2012 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM Peak 15-Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:30 PM h f P 0 0 0 �4J��.�� 11��5 �a r� 0 0 - =�<rri:r:.r:`. rir.+�.�; :ra`,�: ,.� �tiL'cr'i'-C)'�� __fi'ln�__ � � � 11 � � ?r`'k,� � a �� a *� NA ♦J i 4• ~ d 51:f!��i, 4 � ° .F.: NA �► ` �?' � NA �► i ,,aF� � �► � t � � + NA * � � � 4 -�, --� � � t �--- 0.9 0.6 �J� *� 0.0 0.0 0.9 .i i 4 2.2 � 0.0 f � 0,6 0� 1.4 �u 2.2 �M '��` � 2.4 �� 1.9 t 0.0 3 � C 0.0 e► 1.4 h t (° o.o o.o o.o � a r O.D 0.0 I 0 0 1 �—J .� i 4 0 1 �t o 1 �F �' � 1 0 "i C 0 h 4 P � 0 0 0 � I NA J .� i 4 � ,� � L NA � •� � NA � r � t � � NA � R* = RTOR Min Count S Hamden Dr S Hamden Dr S Gulfview Blvd S Gulfview Blvd Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly �inning A4 Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Totals 4:00 PM 0 D 0 0 0 78 0 6 0 1 4 54 0 0 0 0 48 46 0 26 263 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 92 0 6 0 1 10 59 0 0 0 0 30 53 0 28 279 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 3 0 0 10 45 0 0 0 0 71 56 0 35 303 4:45 PM 0 D 0 0 0 82 0 1 0 3 10 59_ _ D 0 0 0 43 30 0 29 257 1102 SF- I.al �'-' 33s 39_� � � ZZ°��, ,�3�f h— ? �OCo Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 Pedestrians 100 Bicycles 0 0 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Commenfs: Report generated on 6/26/2012 12:06 PM B 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 4 BO 20 0 0 0 D 0 0. 0 0 0 0 Total 1200 28 200 0 SOURCE: Quality Counfs, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 ype of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak LOCATION: S Hamden Dr -- Coronado Dr CITY/STATE: Clearwater Beach, FL 31 63 �i f� 3 0 28 d � V 294 �. 4 .} ti 59 {e 350 336 �R � 0.91.. (� 291 340 �Y 0 "L �C 0 r► 364 Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume QC JOB #: 10778504 Peak-Hour: 4:00 PM -- 5:00 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:15 PM -- 4:30 PM r1 ? !�' �0 0 0 a t � '�4�J�� £;t�� 0 0 T%.4tI.T:•l"t,'s�'a,ilCa�s �.a�i� - C:.�? i �.:'i`'�'?`�. .cii`:� ir_�_ ��` E � �� . 0 � ��y 18 � '�� + + � NA J i 4 ~ � .;;ii':�;a: � � NA �► ^�' « NA �y` ^ ,��,,,. ^ � ♦ ` • � � ■ � � a NA * � Nin Count S Hamden Dr Period (Northbound) �inning At Left Thru Riaht U :.m}x � � S Hamden Dr � 3.2 1.6 �� *� 0.0 0.0 3.6 .� i 4 2.4 f• 0.0 j t, 1.7 F+ 2.3 t i��' ,��" � 1.2 •Y .��"'�'"a 2.4 h�{f ��t:.h� 1.2 �► 0.0 � �� i' 0.0 �► 1.4 h t t� 0.0 0.0 0.0 � 8' : o.o o.o 0 0 0 d i 4 0 S�t 3 1 �► ��` � 4 u, 0 'i C' 0 �► * r► � o 0 0 � NA �.� i 4 � � rri L NA �► •� � NA � «y +� { � 1 � NA � R' = RTOR Dr �d) �. Total Hourl� 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 66 13 0 0 161 713 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0' 3 96 0 0 0 0 74 11 0 0 194 708 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 83 0 0 0 0 87 9 0 0 185 702 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 73 11 0 0 166 708 ��- �,OI 3 Z� � �J � � 39 g h � °Cal zg� Peak 75-Min Northbound Flowrates Left Thru Ri ht U R* All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 C Heavy Trucks 0 D 0 Pedestrians 26 Bicycles 0 0 0 Railroad Sto ed Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/26/2012 12:06 PM z u u U 0 4 364 0 0 D. 0 304 7Z 0 C 4 0 0 0 8 0 0. 24 4 20 D 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 2 Total 796 40 68 2 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 8/12/2013 � l � T � � . � . � �t_ n __ _ _. � .� ._ , _ �._ Lane,Group. , �,�:a t �EBL ..,'�EBR � :��NBL . � NBT� � ��SBT <. SBR �� - _ � Lane Configurations � �i'Y' �'�' �`�` � Volume (vph) 278 11 0 513 443 322 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 500 500 500 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.97 0.95 Frt 0.994 0.850 Fit Protected 0.954 Satd. Flow (prot) 3427 0 0 3539 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.954 Satd. Flow (perm) 3322 0 0 3539 3539 1502 ftight Turn on Red No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 354 Link Speed (mph) 20 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 331 260 350 Travel Time (s) 11.3 7.1 9.5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 17 33 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 305 12 0 564 487 354 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 317 0 0 564 487 354 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Heatlway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 2 2 1 Detector Template Left Left Thru Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 6 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Gulfview Coronado Existing 201312:00 pm 4/22/2013 Existing Synchro 8 Report RP Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 8/12/2013 � � � � � � Lane Group :% ' �. .EBL ; . -EBR NBL ; NBT .SBT < SBR W Permitted Phases 2 6 Detector Phase 4 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 41.7% 58.3% 58.3% 58.3% 58.3% Maximum Green (s) 21.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All-Retl Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leatl/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 9.9 32.6 32.6 32.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.65 0.65 0.65 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.25 0.21 0.32 Control Delay 20.0 4.4 4.3 1.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.0 4.4 4.3 1.5 LOS B A A A Approach Delay 20.0 4.4 3.1 Approach LOS B A A _ _ .:- - �- r� ,_ �, !Intersection Summa � ' �� ` " � � �� ° � � � '� � � ry Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 50.5 Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord __ __.___. Maximum v/c Ratio 0�,4Z._ ,� Intersection Signal Delay;,6 6,�� <., Intersection LOS: A""�� Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.5% IC�7l �Ce�t�erv ci e A�.�� Analysis Period (min)15 � Gulfview Coronado Existing 201312:00 pm 4/22/2013 Existing Synchro 8 Report RP Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 8/12/2013 � �, "� 'F.. `r• •� , � .,. . . �_ _.. _ ,. - :; _ Lane;G�oup � � EBL :. � �EBT � =�,WBT - � WBR �_ : SBL ; . SBR �� Lane Configurations �'�` �` � �� Volume (vph) 39 228 206 311 335 20 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.80 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.992 Flt Protected 0.993 0.955 Satd. Fiow (prot) 0 3514 1863 1583 3415 0 Flt Permitted 0.897 0.955 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3129 1863 1273 3415 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Sattl. Flow (RTOR) 331 86 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 300 500 300 Travel Time (s) 8.2 13.6 8.2 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 82 82 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 41 243 219 331 356 21 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 284 219 331 377 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Metlian Width(ft) 0 0 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm NA Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 6 Switch Phase Gulfview Hamtlen Existing 201312:00 pm 4/22/2013 Existing Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3; 8/12/2013 .� _.,, � '+�. 4 .� Lane Group.... # ,. YEBL , �.,�EBT 1NBT �WBR . ::" SBC< SBR� ; Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.5 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 35.0 20.0 20.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 21.4% 50.0% 28.6% 28.6% 50.0% Maximum Green (s) 10.5 31.0 16.0 16.0 31.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All-Retl Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 LeadlLag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Min Min Min None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Waik (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 10.4 10.4 10.4 7.9 Actuatetl g/C Ratio 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.30 v/c Ratio 0.23 0.30 0.47 0.35 Control Delay 6.0 6.9 3.4 6.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.0 6.9 3.4 6.8 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 6.0 4.8 6.8 Approach LOS A A A , Intersection Summary, t � �`�. ,a,>} ; .� ;� �._�, . ;{ Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuatetl Cycle Length: 26.4 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Intersection Si nal De a: 5.7 ,� o �1- ry µ Ye,�l4i.Y�..�Y� Maximum v c Ratio: 7�..,,_r g �j!,�„� ntersection LOS: A ,, Intersection Capacity Utilizaiioil"4�8 /o I ��.uis�-,A-�-�"' Analysis Period (min)15 and Phases: 3: Gulfview Hamden Existing 201312:00 pm 4/2212013 Existing Synchro 8 Report Page 2 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RP Intersection CORONADO DR/HAMDEN enc /Co. GCC DR urisdiction CLEARWATER Date PerFormed 8/12/13 nal sis Year EXISTING nal sis Time Period PM Peak Pro'ect Descri tion East/West Street: CORONADO DR North/South Street: HAMDEN DRIVE Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 4 349 294 61 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 383 0 0 323 67 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 -- -- 0 -- -- Median T pe Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 28 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 30 3 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 0 1 0 1 1 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR Dela , Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT TR (veh/h) 4 33 C (m) (veh/h) 9137 343 v/c 0.00 0.10 95% queue length 0.01 0.32 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.2 16.6 LOS A C pproacfi Delay (s/veh) -- -- 16.6 pproach LOS -- -- C Copyright �O 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 8/12/2013 2:44 PM file:///C:/Users/rpergolizzi/AppData/LocaUTemp/u2k7CCD.tmp 8/12/2013 � .q�t t�� q: T�',B LE 4 Generalizecl Peak Hour Two-W�y Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas soiaiso STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Class I(>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes B C D E Lanes Median B C D E 4 4,000 5,500 6,770 7,300 2 Undivided 930 1,500 1,600 *** 6 �6,000 8,320 10,150 11,290 4 Divided 2,840 3,440 3,SS0 *** 8 8,000 11,050 13,480 15,270 6 Divided 4,370 5,200 5,360 *** 10 10,000 13,960 16,930 19,250 8 Divided 5,900 6,970 7,160 *** 12 13,730 18,600 21,950 23,230 � �t,.�} ��tiPw�a os� �'��.� �''.�� I��r'� FreewayAdjustments � �. �.�,r �^ �.� G. � � � . � � z�. Class II(2.00 to 4�'0 signalized m ersectio �ier mile) Awciliary Ramp ,,r°�anes Median B C D E Lanes Metering 2 Undivided ** 1,020 1,480 1,570 _ + 1,800 + 5% 4 Divided ** 2,420 3 22.0> 3,400 6 Divided ** 3,790 4,880 5,150 jJjy�jNTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS 8 Divided . ** 5,150 6,530 6,880 Lanes Median B C D E 4�'7 �°rv°`°"'a ��'�� z��1 �7' Zq c� � 2 Undivided 730 1,460 2,080 2,620 C1a5S III/IV (more than 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) � Lanes Median B C D E 4 Divided 3,220 4,660 6,040 6,840 � 2 Undivided ** 500 1,150 1,440 6 Divided 4,840 6,990 9,060 10,280 4 Divided ** 1,220 2,730 3,100 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments 6 Divided ** 1,910 4,240 4,680 Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustmeirt factors 8 Divided ** 2,620 5,770 6,280 2 Divided Yes +5% Multi Undivided Yes -5% `"�- �uI'vr� a c� t.�;r� ��,.,,. o��, ��,, �� Wl.,i l�,.. Multi Undivided Na -25% Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments BICYCLE MODEZ (Alter corresponding state volumes by�the indicated percent.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximimm service volumes.) "�U�1� t�J Paved 5houlder/ Bic cle Lane Major City/County Roadways - 10 /o Y Other Signalized R�adway - 3 '��a �° Coverage B C D E 0-49% ** 310 1,180 >1,180 ,C�� TIcTM-�•c� Ceo� �7� t�4t7 50-84% 240 360 >360 *** State & Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) 85-100°/a 620 >620 ** * ** * Divided/LTndivided & Turn Lane Adjustments pEDESTRIAN MODEZ Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes F (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shorvn below by number of directional 2 Divided Yes No +5 ° roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) 2 Undivided No No -20% Sidewalk Coverage B C D E Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 0-49% ** ** 480 1,39D Multi Undivided No No -25% 50-84% ** ** 1,100 1,820 - - - Yes +5% ss-i00% ** 1,100 1,820 >1,820 One-V4'ay Facility Adjustment BUS MOD� (Scheduled Figed Route)3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Multiply the corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 0.6. Sidewalk Coverage B C D E o-s4% >5 >4 >3 >2 ss-100% >4 >3 >2 >1 � Values shown are presented as hourly two-way volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless speci$cally stated. Although presented as peak hour two- way volumes, they actually represent peak hour peak direction conditions with an applicable D factor applied This table does not constitute a standazd and should be used only for general plauning applications. The computer models from which this ta61e is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Calculations are hased on plan�inv applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedeshian LOS Model and Trensit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle, pedeshian and bus modes. 2 Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number of motorized vehicles, not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the ficility. 3 Buses per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single duection of the higher traffic flow. � S'OU7'Ce: ** c�ot te aolueved ��g table i�P,�tvatue fle�vlt5. Florida Department of Transportation "'** Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For the automobile mode, volumes greaffir than level of service D Systems Planning Office become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For the bicycle mode, the level of service letter grade (including 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 F) is not acluevable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. T3I13�1a55ee� FL 32399-0450 www.dot.state.fl.us/plarmin�/svstems/sm/los/default.shtm 2009 FDOT QUALIIY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK Hotel (310) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday Nurnber of Studies: 10 � Average Number of Rooms: 476 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 8.17 ""'°°�. 3.47 - 9.58 3.38 _ Data Plot and Equation . 18,000 17,000 16,000 15,000 14,000 13,000 N c 12,000 W �- 11,000 'i �."' v 10,000 � j 9,000 � 8,000 �. > 7,000 Q �� 6,000 � 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 ! 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 i X= Number of Rooms i X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve �-'-" Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T- 8.95(X) - 373.'16 . R2 - 0.98 Trip Generation, 9th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers 613 680 Resort Hotel (330) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: . Occupied Roc�ms . On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 10 Average Number of Occupied Rooms: 429 � ,. Directional Distribution: 43% entering, 57% exiting Trip Generation per Occ 0.49 Room �. Range of Rates 0.27 - 0.72 Standard Deviation OJO Trip Generafion, 9th Edition � Institute of Transportation Engineers n Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: � � � t � � 8/13/2013 � .� � � � � � .� -� � : �, �. Lane,Group �. ,��:,-�. � �- ��BL` EBR �� =NBL :,NBT SBT..: � �SBR ��, � :��, .;�� _�� , ��„�, t�„ _ . �, � �; ,- � Lane Configurations 'i�i'' � �'T 'F�' i' Volume (vph) 334 11 0 797 660 373 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 500 500 500 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.97 0.95 Frt 0.995 0.850 Flt Protected 0.954 Satd. Flow (prot) 3430 0 0 3539 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.954 Satd. Flow (perm) 3324 0 0 3539 3539 1502 Right Turn on Red No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 410 Link Speed (mph) 20 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 331 260 350 Travel Time (s) 11.3 7.1 9.5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 17 33 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 367 12 0 876 725 410 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 379 0 0 876 725 410 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 2 2 1 Detector Template Left Left Thru Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 6 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Gulfview Coronado Future 2013 8/13/2013 FUTURE WITH PROJECT Synchro 8 Report RP Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings g: 8/13/2013 � � "� T � .d �ane Group `�x=�:�,��.�>w��.��EB � „�EBI� �:-,x,NBL.'.F'.NBT � =,,SBT�,�;3s..SBR �° .,�,�,r3R�� s ��a �� .� .��. r , Permitted Phases 2 6 Detector Phase 4 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 41.7% 58.3% 58.3% 58.3% 58.3% Maximum Green (s) 21.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Leatl-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 10.7 31.7 31.7 31.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.63 0.63 0.63 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.39 0.33 0.37 Control Delay 20.1 5.6 5.2 1.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 20.1 5.6 5.2 1.7 LOS C A A A Approach Delay 20.1 5.6 3.9 Approach LOS C A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 50.4 Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.52 Intersection Signal� lay: 7�_1�.7 Intersection Capacity Utifization 53.5% Analysis Period (min) 15 { __ `"�-,ln#�rsection LOS: A ICU Level of Service•A �'' Gulfview Coronatlo Future 2013 8/13/2013 FUTURE WITH PROJECT Synchro 8 Report RP Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3; 8/13/2013 .� � � �l.. 4 ,.�' � � � .e. ,"�3' ' av qr�� . � � ��,� « � �* .,e.�,�. �* vs "'� �, ,> ?�-�,�'�i .,: &' ��* :��'�' ^. Lane Gr.,ouRr:��,�d��EBL,��EBT��;,�1NBT� `�INBR ��, �fr.aSBL� �; �.SBR. fi�_....,� �., � � � � � �� ,�� '; �,��.. � „�.. � � � � � ,. Lane Configurations �'T` �` �' �i�ii' Volume (vph) 43 262 243 443 487 22 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.80 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.994 Flt Protected 0.993 0.954 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3514 1863 1583 3420 0 Flt Permitted 0.892 0.954 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3118 1863 1273 3420 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 471 86 Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25 Link Distance (ft) 300 500 300 Travel Time (s) 8.2 13.6 8.2 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 82 82 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 46 279 259 471 518 23 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 325 259 471 541 0 Enter Blocketl Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm NA Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 6 Switch Phase Gulfview Hamden Future 12;00 pm 8/13/2013 FUTURE WITH PROJECT Synchro 8 Report RP Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vlc Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS � � �-- �l.. ti► .� 4.0 8.5 15.0 21.4% 10.5 3.5 1.0 Lead Yes 3.0 None 4.0 20.0 35.0 50.0% 31.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 3.0 Min 5.0 11.0 0 11.6 0.39 0.27 6.8 0.0 6.8 A 6.8 A 4.0 20.0 20.0 28.6% 16.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 Lag Yes 3.0 Min 5.0 11.0 0 11.6 0.39 0.35 8.1 0.0 8.1 A 5.9 A 4.0 20.0 20.0 28.6% 16.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 Lag Yes 3.0 Min 5.0 11.0 0 11.6 0.39 0.60 4.7 0.0 4.7 A 4.0 20.0 35.0 50.0% 31.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 4.0 3.0 None 5.0 11.0 0 9.7 0.33 0.46 8.4 0.0 8.4 A 8.4 A 8/13/2013 �`�is&,�s"+,' - a "�-�..�+ �� :a.# ' 1 ' P�,'� _ .�r .�,.. � � _ `"'T< - a': ��s, � "� .a'�'*� , o'-'"�-•�'�: -; � : �. :� � s � �' � � r lntersection,�Sur�marys� '„"��.� °��,t��`�''a.�� ,k.,��+z,Rr.,x��a..':; ?�iz�:=; 4�.,�a;.s�,;�,a"`?=:�:,��'?a�`�'F�°�,��'R �` �*ns�a��,%��r;?h.��;�*:'�'��x,,.�`� Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 29.6 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.60 ,�- Intersection Signal Delay: 6.9..� 'M�I�#et�ection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utiliz`aCr�'48.0% ICU Level of Service A„ / Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 3: Gulfview Hamden Future 12:00 pm 8/13/2013 FUTURE WITH PROJECT Synchro 8 Report RP Page 2 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RP Intersection CORONADODR/HAMDEN enc /Co. GCC DR Date Performed 8/13/13 urisdiction CLEARWATER nal sis Year FUTURE WITH PROJECT nal sis Time Period PM Peak Pro'ect Descri tion East/West Street: CORONADO DR North/South Street: HAMDEN DRIVE Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 4 459 392 61 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.99 0.97 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 504 0 0 430 67 veh/h Percent Hea Vehicles 9 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT T TR U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 75 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.99 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 82 3 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 0 1 0 1 1 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR Dela Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT TR v (veh/h) 4 85 C (m) (veh/h) 1038 245 lc ,_ _` 0. 00 0.35 95% queue length 0�9� 1.48 Control Delay (s/veh) �'*� 8.5 � 27.3 LOS !'" ___,�, D ,, pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- \`� 27.3 pproach LOS -- -- ��,, D Co ri ht O 2007 Universi of Florida, All Ri hts Reserved TM �' PY 9 tY 9 HCS+ Version 5.3 Generated:��/13f2013 12:33 PM �� file:///C:/Users/rpergolizzi/AppDataJLocal/Temp/u2k5A3.tmp 8/13/2013 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RP Intersection S. GULFVIEW/DRIVEWAY enc /Co. GCC urisdiction CLEARWATER Date Performed 8/13/2013 nal sis Year FUTURE WITH PROJECT nal sis Time Period PM PEAK Pro'ect Descri tion East/West Street: S. GULFVIEW BLVD North/South Street: DRIVEWAY Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 618 13 9 573 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 9.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 664 93 9 616 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0 Configuration T TR LT U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h 18 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 19 0 12 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Hea Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Confi uration LR Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 9 31 C (m) (veh/h) 911 216 lc 0.09 0.14 95% queue length 0.03 0.49 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.0 24.4 LOS A C pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 24.4 pproach LOS -- -- C Copyright OO 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 8/13/2013 2:12 PM file:///C:/Users/rpergolizzi/AppData/I,ocal/Temp/u2kC4AF.tmp 8/13/2013