The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2013-09033� � 1013 ELDORADO AVE ° C �ar�vater � FLS2013-09033 »�°"�"'��.-�°"4�.,��"`� °'_ •� James and Gaye Staskiel ��.�-.�..,�-°�� Det n.�"'"�,�x"'�"°�^�..•.�"`"`'��- `°'�trn�"` Zoning: Low Medium Density Re Atlas #: 238 pment Department t Application �ory Use/Structures fi t5 IiVCUMBENT UROiV THE APPLICAiVi i0 SUBMii COMRLETE AND CORRECT tNFORMAitOiV. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPIETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMtTTED FOR REVtEW BY 7HE DEVELOPMENT REV(EW COMMtTTEE. PLANS AND APPLICATiONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPL(CATION FEE: $200 (rf for detached dwellings or duplexesJ OR $100 (if for accessory uses/structures for detached dwellings/dup/exes) PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Staskiel A James, Staskiel M Gaye MAIUNG ADDRESS: 43S MU1TflleC� LOOp RelllllOri, FL 34747 PNONE NUMBER: EMAIL: AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: 7iacomo ,1C ri or Richard T arcel wi h The u�ta�nabilt,� r0 T.L,� MAILING ADDRESS: G31g ROWa.ri ROaC�, New Port Richey FL 34653 PHONE NUMBER: %2�]-()4S-S IOS Ennai�: giacomo@SGroupfl.com; richard@SGroupfl.com a��RESS oF sus�ECr PROPERTr: 1013 Eldorado Avenue_ Clearwater FL 33767 "' 1 • � •.• 1.. 11� 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 4, Block 68, MANDALAY "THE ISLE OF A THOUSAND PALMS" CLEARWATER BEACH, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 14, Pages 32-35, of the public Records of Pinellas Count, Florida. PROPOSE� usE(s): Sin�le Family Home DESCRIPT(ON OF REQUEST: See attachment "A" Specifically identify ihe request (include all requested rnde flexibility,• e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height, seibacks, loi size, lot width, specific use, etc.): Planning 8� Development Departrnent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clean�vater, FL 33766, Tel: 727-562�567; Fax: 727�62�865 Page 1 of 7 Revised 01J12 � r � C ea�wate " � �"�°°°"a.:.��-``�,."°"..�� , �'" �,,��`",�..�.�"'�.,,.��.��' Planning & Development Department Flexible Standard Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAiLURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ��;��6�d�C i�i�f"€�iCi: hiiT�i�t� �iitVCi i3�E PLs��i LbESI��tATiOhi: EXISTING USE (currently existing on site) "LMDR" Low Medium Density Residential District "RU" Residential Urban Single Family PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): Single F mi V SITE AREA: 3.381.13 SF sq. ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: 5 4�5 sq. ft. � Proposed: �4,84 sq. ft. Maximum Allowable: �55' 4 sq. ft. 0.15 AC acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses): First use: 5,484 sq. ft. Second use: N�A sq. ft. Third use: N/A sq. ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: 1.07 Proposed: 0.68 Maximum Allowable: � 4� BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (15S floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: 1,371 sq. ft. ( 21.48 °� of site) Proposed: 1,463 sq. ft. ( 22.92 °� of site) Maximum Permitted: 2,552.45 sq. ft. ( 40.00 % of site) GREEN SPACE WITHtN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: N�A sq. ft. ( % of site) Proposed: j�j/A sq. ft. ( % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: N/A sq. ft. ( % of site) Proposed: N/A sq. ft. ( % of site) Planning & bevelopment Departrnent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: i27di62-4865 Page 2 of 7 Revised 01/12 � . ,,� <r , j, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (totai square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: 0.51 Proposed: 0.55 Maximum Permitted: 0.65 DENSITY (units, rooms or beds pe� �:-�+ ';c ,"�;'` BUILDING HEIGHT: . .. . Existing: 1 Unit Existing: ±30'-0" (from Base Flood Elevation to roof midpoint) Proposed: 1 Unit Proposed: ±31'-8 1/2" (from Base Flood Elevation to roof midpoint Maximum Permitted: 1 Unit Maximum Permitted: 30'-0° �� OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: 2 Spaces Note: A parking demand siudy must be provided In conjuncrion with any request Proposed: 2 Spaces to reduce the amount of required off-streer parking spaces. Ptease see the Minimum Required: 2 Spaces adopred Parking Demand StudyGuidelines forfurtherinformariorr. WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PRCiJECT UPON COMPLETION? $ 350'000.00 ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: "LMDR" Low Medium Density Residential District South: "LMDR" Low Medium Density Residential District East: "LNIDR" Low Medium Density Residential District west: "LMDR" Low Medium DensiTy Residential District STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this �3 day of representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize ��'��''�`� _�-a % 3 . to me and/or by City representatives to visit and photograph the �D 4'� �r`c.lr'�� , who is personally known has property described in this application. produced �� ft.7� as identification. �P � �� • `� re of property owner or representative �.�.� � Notary public, My commission expires: � .��f �� :r+� �"''o. ALEX AREHER ' 2� Notuy. Pub1iC • 6l�tt Ot �loridt _� �= My Comm. Expires Alty 21. Z019 ��'�, h npt� Co�niRl�iOn I iF 020��13 Planning 8� Development Depar6nent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-d567; Fax: 727562-4865 Page 3 ot 7 Revised 01N2 U C ear�vater - 'o.4P✓°°"�.�`�.��`°°`,�...�'"L. a°'��.,° v� a�� °k.,.,�"'t-...�'"°"'«�, �' �-�'' -....��'""„�.�""`��a °.,..��'"°'°>,..M�`".,u._,�°, Planning & Development Department Flexible Standard Development Application Site Plan Submittal Package Check list IIY ADOtT(ON TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE STANDARD dEVELOPMENT (FLS) APPUCATION, ALL FLS APPLICATIONS FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING, DUPLEX� OR ACCESSORY USEfSTRUCTURE ASSOCIATED WITH EITHER A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING OR DUPLEX SHALL INCLUDE A PLOT PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: ❑ Responses to the General Applicability criteria as set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Standard Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is tocated. The attached Flexible Standard Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including ofFicial records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. ❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower (andings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. ❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH (diameter at breast height), and species on the parcel proposed for development with a DBH of four inches or more and identifying those trees proposed to be removed. ❑ A site plan with the following information: ❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. ❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Conirol Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. ❑ Location, setbacks and use of all existing and proposed building and structures. ❑ Location of all existing and proposed parking areas, sidewalks and driveways. ❑ Location, type of material and height of all existing and proposed fences. ❑ Location of all existing and proposed utilities, including water, sewer, gas, and stormwater. ❑ Location of all existing utility easements, including Official Records book and page numbers, and any proposed utility easements. ❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height, building materials, and concealment of all mechanical equipment located on the roof. Planning & Development Depar6nent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearvvater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562�567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 7 Revised 01/12 � r � e�r�vater - _-��.,��,�.�°°".,_.f�..�.-� Planning & Development Department Flexible Standard Development Application " ��-��-�� %�� General Applicability Criteria PROVfDE COMPtEiE RESPOiVSES TO EACH OF iHE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLtCABtLITY CRITERIA EXRLAfIYtIVG HOW, IN DETAtL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attached "B" 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Attached "B" 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Attached "B" 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Aitached "B" 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attached "B" 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attached "B" Planning & Development Department, 700 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562�L567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 5 of 7 Revised 01/12 LL ° � earwater Planning & Development Department Flexible Standard Development Application � Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(5) BEIN6 REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(5) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAI�, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPl1ED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). i. See Attached RCn St1Cl „D� 2. See Attached "C" and "D" 3. See Attached "C" and "D" 4• See Attached "C" and "D" 5. See Attached "C" and "D" 6. See Attached "C" and "D" �• See Attached "C" and "D" s. See Attached "C" and "D" PlanMng b Developmerrt Departrr�eM,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater. FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727,562-4865 P� g� � Revised 01 M 2 `�, Clearwater Planning & Development Department Flexible Standard Development Application ' Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: Staskiel A James Staskiel M Gave 2. That (I am/we are) the owner�s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: See attached Le�al Descriptions 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request�: See AtWchment A 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Giacomo l.icari and Richard .I Marcel with "l'he Sustainabil[} Group, I_LC as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersign ority, hereby cerIify that the foregoing is true and correct. aperty Owner Property Owner �- � � P ner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF Pt�f49'�{'l Ot��j� BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DUIY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FIORIDA, ON THIS / C��AY OF S F` \ , Z� ( 3 , PERSONALLY APPEARED � R`1L rn 5Tf1 `3K i c L `� `��'}�yy�� } STY� S 1-� � r L WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOS D SP{i(��j��-i�F��€�Y UNDERSI�AND E CONTE FIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA , Comm# EE120774 g ��u� �� •' E 19� Expires 12/7/2015 Notary Public Si nature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: Planning 8 Development Departrnen; 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4885 Page 7 of 7 Revised Ot/12 ATTACHMENT A DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS The subject property is located at 1013 Eldorado Avenue on North Cleaiwater Beach. The property formerly had a three store building, which it has been pardally demolished. Some of the first story vertical walls at the first level as well as the building foundations and the pool have been kept and they wiIl be udlized for the new construction. The project consists of a new three story bnilding, it is proposed to be constructed over the existing building footprints and foundations. The new three story building includes 5,484 SF floor area, 890 SF total garage area. The subject prnperty contains (1) full Lot as depicted on the survey. The progerty falls within the City of Clearwater's Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) and Residential Urban (Ril�. The community is a subdivision located on the northern portion of Ciearwater Beach. Homes within the community are similar in character, bulk with reduced setbacks to most of their property lines. The scope includes building a new three story building by utilizing what it was left from the demolitions including the building foundations. Site improvements include the reconfiguration of the access driveway. The third story will cantilever toward the front 18 inches in respect to the first floor and will encroach the required 25 feet front setback by 1.2 feet The second and third story will cantilever toward the south side of 12 inches in respect to the first floor and will encroach the required 5 feet side setback from 0 to 12 inches. The existing building respects all of the required maximum setback for the first floor. The second and third story of the demolished building encroached the south building setback for approximate 12 inches, the third story encroached the north (side) side setback of appmximate 18 inches. A reduction to the west setback [front) third story setback is being requested from 25.00 ft. to 23.80 ft A reduction of the side setback (south) for the second and third story building is being requested, from 5.00 ft. to 4.00 R. A building height increase is being requested from 30 feet from the Base Flood Elevation to 31.71 feet from Base Flood Elevation. An increase to the FAR is being requested from 0.40 to O.fi8 The reqnest includes: • Reduction to the front setback (east) for the building third story encroachment from 25.00 ft to 23.80 ft • Reduction to the side setback (south) for the second and third story building encroachment fmm 5A0 t�. to 4.00 ft. • Building height from 30 feet from the Base Flood Elevation to 31.71 feet from Base Flood Elevation. • Increase the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) from 0.40 to 0.68. • Increase of the maximum permitted roof overhang and roof eaves setback encroachments from 40 percent of the setback to 80 percent on the south (side) and to 58 percent on north (side) setback. ., ATTACHMENT B WRITTEN SUBMITTAI REQUIREMENTS i. Tfie proposed development of the la�d will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The subject renomtivn/reconstruction maintains and further enhances the harmony of the surrounding community by main[aining a simiiar medium residentiol intensity to adjacent properties. The propvsed building is a ihree story building wirh a first story square footage of approximate 1,46'3 square feet of covered building. The second story has approximote 1,932 square feet rnaered area; the third level has 2,089 square feet covered area. The totai covered area is 5,484 square feei with o gornge orea af 890 square feet, stairs and elevator area of 166 squore feet and a total grrns floor area of 4,328 squore feeL Low Medium intensity Residential zoning albws for a maximum FAR of 0.40. The builrling on the north /ot is also a three story building with an approximate 7,519 squore feet buiiding covered orea, with an existing FAR of 1.18. The structure on the south lot is a two story building approximate 3,365 square feet with an FAR of 0.35. The residence in j`�nnt of the subject property across Eldomdo Avenue is a three story building with on approximate 6,462 square feet with an FAR of 0.98 The proposed floor area ratio (FAR) for [he subject property is 0.68 which is similar in scate, bulk and densiiy of the other surrounding properties. The existing building height of ihe demolished three story 6uilding was approximate 31 feet from base flood elevation. The base flood elevation (BFE) 13.00 feet. The maximum building height ollowed within LMOR is 30 fieet above the BfF. With the proposed renovations/reconstruction the proposed building height from the BFE to the roof midpoint of the third level building is 31'-81/2" feet. The build+ng to the north is a three story bui►ding wiih similor building height. The closest building to the south is a two story buitding. There are several buildings on Eldorada Avenue that are three stories and have similar heigh� The subject property has existing building fiat story setback to the south (side) properry line of 5.2 feet The existing buitding setback to the north (side) is 3.OD fee� to the east (reor) is 33.31 feet and to the wpst (finnt) olong Eldorodo Avenue is 25.20 fee� the sernnd ond third story encraach the south (side) set6ock for approximaie 1 fooi and the third story encraached ihe north (side) setback for approximate 1.5 feet. The structure toward the north has a front setback along Eldomdo Avenue of approximate 25 fee� south (side) setback of 9 feet east (rear) setback of 11.35 fieet. The Nasest structur+e towards Lhe south has o front seiback of approximate 25 feet with a front porch and stoirs encroaching the front setback for approximate 3 feet, north (side) setbock of approximate 24.3 f+eet o»d east (rear) setback of 38.56 fee� rhe south property has aisa a detached structure adjocent ro subject property; the detached structure has o setbock from the property line of 2.6 feet which encroaches into the side setback The residence across the street in front of the subject property have a front setback of approximate 10 feet, and this reduced buiiding frant secback is neflected on almost all of the prnperties building located on the west side of Eidorada Avenue. The subject property proposed front setbacks are 25.32 feet for the fint story and 23.86 feei for the proposed third story, the proposed north (side) setback for the first story is 5.00 feet and the proposed souih (side) second and thinl story building setback is 4 f+eet. Ti►e subject property proposed setbacks are similar to the existing building setbacks of the adjacent properties. The subject property exisiing architeciurai style Contemporary style, the proposed renovation will be Florida Vernacular Style in harmony wifh the adjacent properties. The proposed building colors are white�ream with an aluminum roof. The existiny twiMing rnlor for the property to ihe north is a cream �ight color wfth a l�ght red roof. Ti►e property to the south is a yetlow light cblor with a dork roof. Overol! the redevelopment of the proposed structure wifl be in harmony wirh the bulk, sca/e, density and charocter of the surrounding properties. 2. The proposed development wil{ not hinder or discourage the appropriate devebpment and use of adjacent Fand and buildings or significar�tty impair the value thereof. The proposed development serves the surrounding !ow medium dens+ty residential community as a whole. Trie building will be renovoted and enhance per City of Clearwater' Building Department and is designed to set a high standanf, which is in harmony with the surrounding residencies. The subject property hos existing bu+lding first story setback to the souih (side) property line of 5.1 feet. The existing buiMing setback to the north (side) is 5.00 fee� to the eost (reor) is 33.31 feet and to the rvest (fr�nni) olong Eldorado Avenue is 25.20 feet, the second and third story encroach the south (sideJ setback for approximate 1 foot and the third story encroached the north (side) setback for approximate 1.5 feei. The structure toward the north has a front setback along Eldorodo Avenue of opproximate 25 feet, south (side) setback of 9 feet east (rearJ setback of 11.35 feet. The ctosest structure towords the south has o front setbock of approximate 25 feet with o front porch and stairs encroaching the front setback for approximaie 3 fee�, north (side) setback of opproximate 24.3 feet ond east (reor) setback of 38.56 fee� the south property has also a detached structure adjacent to subject property; the detached structure has a setback from the property line of 2.6 feet which encroaches into the side setback. The residence across the street in front of the subject property have a front setback of approximate 10 feet, and this reduced building front set6ock is reflected on almost all of the properties building located on the west side of Eldorodo Avenue. The subject property proposed setbocks are similar to the existing building setbacks of the adjacent properties. The proposed building height is in consistent with several residences located along Eidorado AvenuP including the one od/aceni to the north. The new building wi!► be in harmony of the neighborhood charocteristia and increases the neighborhood ond the odjacent homes value by bringing inio the comparison market a sirociure which is similar in bulk, size and dimensivns. The proposed buiMing first story respects alI the nequired setbatks. 'the front and side setback reduction is 1.2 feet and 1 foot respectfulty and it is for the second and third stories. The front and side setback reduction wi11 not obstruct accessibiliry to the building Adjacent properties use(s) are sing�e family homes, which are the same as the subject property. Furthermore, the renovation/reconstruction io ihe exisiing siruciure onty enhances the volues of the surrounding residences and in no way wiil hinder or impair the value of. The subject renovafion/reconstruction maintain minimum building setbacks and don't do not hinder visual interest of the existing communrty or prevent any abutting properties from development or being improved. 3. The proposed deveiopmsnt will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood o� the proposed use. The property is located within on the northern point of Clearwater Beach. The proposed renovaiionJreconstruction will not advenely affect ihe health of safety of ihe surrounding community, sincae constrvcti+vn will be limited to the proposed structure. Furthermore, once the reno�rtion is comp�te it wil� onty enhonce the rnmmunity char+acteristic, while maintaining a front setback of 25.00�eet fiom tt+e first and second stories to Eldorodo Avenue's ROW line. 4. The proposed developmerrt is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Tt►ere wil! no increase to tro�c demands, since there is no density increase to the subject P�Pe►'�Y• 5, 7'he proposed development is co�sistent with the community charader of the immediate vicinity o�F the parcel proposed for developmeM. The subject property had a Contemporvry architecturol style building, the proposed renovoiion wiU be a Florida Vernacular style which is consistent with the community character. The proposed building colors off-white%ream and aluminum mof. Tiie existing building colors for the property to the north are white light for the building and white light red color for the roof. The adjocent property to the south hns a residential two story building with a yeNow light color with o dark roof. The residential buildings in front of the subject property on the wesi side of E►dorado Avenue are two and three story building with similar architectural sty►es and sizes. The proposed renovation has similar exterior building look to the adjacent buildings. The subject property hos existing building seiback to the south property line of 5.1 feet. The existing building setback to the north (side) is 5.00 fee� to the east (rear) is 33.31 feet arrd to the west (front) along Ekiorodo Avenue is 25.20 feet. The structure toward the north has a froni setback along Eldorodo Av�nue of approximate 25 fee� south (side) setback of 9 feet east (rear) setback of 2135 fieet. The dosest structure towards the south has a front setback of approximate 25 feet with a front porch and stairs encroaching the front setback for approximate 3 feet, north (side) set6ack of approximate 14.3 feet and east (rsear) setback of 38.56 feet, the south property hos also a detached strocture adjacent to subject property; the detached structure has a setback from the property line o�2.6 feet which encroaches into ihe side setback. The residence across the street in front of the sublect property have o froni setback of opproximaie 10 fee� and this reduced building front setback is refiected on almost a!l of the properties building located on the west side of Eldo�do Avenue. The subject property proposed setbacks ane similar to the existing building setbacks of the adjocent properties. Overoll the subject property proposed setbacks ore similar to the existing building setbacks of the adjocent properties. Ti►e proposed buflding beighi, FAR bulk ond size are similar and rn harmony with the neighbor residences and it is consis#ent with the cbmmunity chanader. 6. The desiqn of the proposed devebpment minimi:es adverse effects, Induding visual, a�ustic and olfadory and hours of operation impacts, on adjaceM properties. The praposed renovation does not have adverse effects on surrounding properties. Ti►e proposed front setback reduction for the third story does not adverse impact the neighbon properties, the 1.2 extrusion into the maximum front setback is at an approximate height of 20 feet from finish floor and it does not visual impact the adjocent properties. The south (side) secback reduction of 1 foot far the second ond third stories is at opproximate height of 10 ond 20 feet from frnish floor elevation. The extrusion is within the property line at seibock of 4 feet ond ii does not visual impact the south adjacent property. ►n addition ii is less than the existing 2.6 feet setbock for ihe existing goroge located within the south property boundaries. The roof overhang is on the third story at approximate 31 fieet above the first finish �loor elevation and does not adverse impact visualty ihe adjacent properties. Furthermore, the subject property does not increase or contribute to any otfoctory or acoustic effecis. Hours of operotion are not applicable to the subject project. ATTACHMENT C FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA for RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS 1. Single-family detached dwellings are the only permitted use eligible for residerrtial infili project appliwtion;: a. The existing use is a detached residentiai dwelling located within the "LMDR" Low Medium Density Residential, There are no proposed changes to the use for redevelopment of ihe subjeci property. 2. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the foilowing: intensity; other development standanls; a. The subject renovotion/reconstruction wili use the same building firsc story building footprints and joundations. The extrusion of the third story to the front and side seiback and the second story io the side setback give a break on the building elevations which enhances the architectural look !n order to mainta+n the maximum front setback at 25 feet and to have the proposed architectura/ design, the first floor walls and foundation need to move 1.2 feet toward ihe inside of the parcel, which it makes the proposed renovation and reconstrurtion impracticol. The side building setback reduction varies from 0 to 1 foot and is proposed for the second story is olong the south side of building, which is the same as ihe existing build+ng that was recently demolished. 7'he front building setback of the majority of the residences along the west Eldorado Avenue, are below the maximum allowed setback. A similarsetback reduction was approved in the past to the residence located ot 1001 Eldorado Avenue under application No. FLS20Q4-11073. The overoll size and intensity of the proposed redevebpment is in harmony with the surrounding residences. 3. The deveiopment of the paroel proposed for development as a residentiai infili project will not mate�ialty reduce tfie fair market value of abutting properties; a. The redevelopment/reconstruction of ihe property is an effort io mainiain and increase the value of the subject property and it will positivety contributes to the va/ue of the overol! neighborhood and a6utting properties. The proposed building squore footoge is 5,484 square feet of covered. The dosest structure towards the south is approximate 3,365 square feet. The struciure towards the north is approximate 7,519 square feet. The subject property is a Colonia!/eeoch architectural style; the proposed renovation wil! be v Colonial/ Seach style more in harmony with the adjacent properties. The proposed buikfing colors ore white-cream with an aluminum roof. The exis[ing buiiding color fvr the property to the north is a cream light color with a light red roof. Overall the subject project redevelopment 1 similar in character and size and its similarity wili not reduce the markei value of the abutting properties. 4. The uses within the residential infiti project are otherwise permitted in the district; a. The existing residential structure is currently a one unit dwelling within LMDR zoning district. There are no chanyes proposed to the subject use and therefore adheres to uses permitted within LMDR district. 5. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; a. The proposed project consists of renovation/reconsiruction improvements io the existing residential structure. Surrounding properties consists of one unit detached dwellings and ar�e the only use within the LMDR zoning district. The proposed residence renovation is perfectly compatible with the adjaceni land uses as single family detached dwelling within a!ow medium density residential district. The subject property is fully compatible with adjacent land uses. 6. The de�relopment of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;: a. The parcei is an exi.sting singie famity detached dwelling. The renovation including the upgrade includes remodeling of the existing structure for both interior and exterior elemenis. The existing building was a three stvry building and the proposed renovation/reconstruction wit! also be a three story buildirtg. The overa/I renovation is in harmony ond similarity with the surrounding properties and wi11 enhance the overol/ architectural look by the addition of features such as the building front entronce, tall front windows and the extrusion of the third story. The overal/ front building architectural look enhancement will upgrode the closest rmmediate property 7. The design of the proposed resideMiai infili p�oject creates a form and fu�ction which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and tl�e C'ity af qean�rater as a whole; a. The subject property maintains and further enhances the harmony of the surrounding community by maintaining a similar /ow residential intensiiy to adjacent properties. The existir►g build+ng (recently demolished) square footage is 6,821 square feet of covered orea with an existing FAR of 1.07. tow Medium Intensity zoning aHows for a maximum FAR of 0.40. The closest structure towards the north is approximate 7,519 square feet, with an existing FAR of 1.18. The structure towards the south is approximate 3,365 square feet with an FAR of 0.98. The subject property at the proposed building square footage is 4,328 tota/ gross floor area with an (FAR) is 0.68 below the existing FAR and in harmony with the immediate adjacent parcels. The existing buiiding height elevation of the third story peok roof is approximate 45 feet above the garage elevation. With the proposed renovaiions the building height for the roof peak is 45'-3 3/16" and 31'-8 34" from the base flood e/evation to the roof midpoint. The building to the north is three story building with similar height above the base flood e/evation. The closest building to the south is a two story with approximate e%vation of 20 feet above the base flood elevaiion. b. The subject property has existing building first story setback to the south (side) property line of 5.1 feet The existing building setback to the north (side) is 5.00 fee� to the east (rear) is 33.31 feet and to the west (front) along Eldorado Avenue is 25.20 fee� the second and thfrd story encroach the south (side) setback for approximate 1 foot and the third story encroached the north (side) setback for approximate 1.5 feet The structure toward the north has a front setback along Eldorado Avenue of approarimate 25 fee� south (side) setback of 9 feet east (rear) setback of 11.35 feet The closeststructure towards the south has a front setback of approximate 25 feet with a front porch and sbairs encroaching the frontsetback for approximate 3 fee� north (side) setback of approximate 14.3 feet and east (rear) setback of 38.56 fee� the south property has also a detached structure adjacent to subject properLy; the detacT�ed structure has a setback from the property line of 2.6 feet which encroaches into the side setback The residence across the street in front of the subject property have a frontsetback ofapproximate 10 fee� and ti►is reduced building frontsetback is reflected on almost all of the properties build+ng located an the west side of Eldorado Avenu� The proposed redevelopment by interior renovation and exteriorstructures addition will positivety increase the residence value. The renovotion will be consisteni with the existing abutting residence s and with ihe overall community character of the neighborhood and the City of Clearwater as whole. 8. Fiexibility in regard to lot wvidth, required setbacks, height, off-street parking access or other development standards are justiiied by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the Ciiy of dearwater as a whole; a. The proposed flexibility in regard to the front and side seiback for the proposed renovation are justified because the reduced second and third story setback wiN enhances the building design and exterior look. The renovated building firsi story exterior waNs remain the same. The entrusion of the third story to the front and side setback and the second story to the side setbock give a break on the building elevations which enhances the architectural look. The front setback reduction is only 1.2 feet, and it extends for 32.5 feet of the building frontage for the third story only. The side building setback reduction varies from 0 to 1 foot and is proposed for the secor+d story is along the south side of building, ihis setback reduction is similor to the existing building (recentty demolished) second and third story south (side) setbocks. The proposed building height and square footage are similar to the exisiing one, the immediate building io the north and several building on Eldorado Avenue. The architectuml design with the proposed setback encroachments, building height and g�oss floor area, brings value and benef+ts co the subject property and to the immediate vicinity parcels and the City of Gearwater as a whofe. ATTACHMENT D DETACHED DWELLINGS FRONT SETBACK: a. A determination of the front setback shall consider the extent to which existing structu�es in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform set back from the right-of-way The subject property has existing building first story front setback the west (frontJ along Eldorado Avenue of 25.20 feet. The structure toward the north has a front setback along Eidorodo Avenue of approximate 25 feet. The closest structure towards ihe south has a front setback of approximate 25 feet with a front porch and stairs encroaching the front setback for approximate 3 feet. The residences across ihe street in front of the subject property have a front setback of approximate 10 feet, ond this reduced building front setbock is reflected on almost all of the properties building located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue. The proposed building first story respects all the required setbacks. The front setback reduction is 1.2 feet and it is for the thiM story. The front setback redudion will not obstruct oaessibility to the building. Overoil the redevetopment of the proposed structure wili be in harmony with the surrounding properties and similar setbacks. b. The redudion in front setbadc wiii not adversely affect adjacent property values. The redevelopment/reconstruction of the property is an effort io maintain and increase the value of the subject property and it wil/ positive/y contributes to the va/ue of the overall neigh6orhood and abutting properties. The proposed building square footage is 5,484 squore feet of covered. The closest strudure towards the south is approximate 3,365 square feet. The structure towards the north is approximate 7,519 square feet. The subject property is a Co/onial/Beach architectural style; the proposed renovation will be a Colonial/Beach style more in harmony with the adjacent properties. The proposed building colors are white-cream with an aluminum roof. The existing building color for the property to the north is a creom light color with a light red roof. Overall the subject project redevelopment / similor in character and size and iis similarity witl not reduce the market va/ue of the abutting properties. c. The reduction in front setbadc is consistent with �eighborhood character The subject property is o Colonial/eeach architecturai style, the proposed renovation will be a Cotonial/Beach style which is consistent with the community character. The proposed building colors off-whit%ream and aluminum roof. The existing building colors for the property to the north are white light for the buiiding and white light red color for the roof. The adjacent property to the south has a residential two story building with a yellow light co/or with a dark roof. The residential buildings in front of the subject property on the west side of Eldorado Avenue are two and three story building with similar architectura/ style and dimensions. The proposed renovation has similar exterior building look to the adjacent buildings. The su6ject property has existing building setback to the south property line of 5.1 feet. The existing building setback ro the north (side) is 5.00 feei, to the east (rear) is 33.31 feet and to the west (front) along Eldorado Avenue is 25.20 feet. The structure toward the north has a front setback a/ong E/dorado Avenue of approximate 25 feet, south (side) setback of 9 feet east (rear) setback of 11.35 feet. Tfie dosest structure towards the south has a front setback of approximate 25 feet with a front porch and stain encroaching the front setback for approximate 3 feet, north (side) setback of approximate 14.3 feet and east (rear) setback of 38.56 feet, the south property has atso a detached structure adjocent to subject property; the detached structure has o setback from ihe property line of 2.6 feet which encroaches into the side setback The residence across the street in front of the subject property have a front setback of approximate 10 feet, and this reduced building front setback is reflected on a/most all of the properties 6uilding located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue. The subject property proposed setbocks are similar to the existing bui/ding setbacks of the adjacent properties. Overoll the subject property proposed setbacks are similar to the existing building setbacks of the adjacent properties. The proposed building height, FAR bulk and siie are similar and in harmony wiih the neighbor residences and it is consistent with the community character. d. The redudion in front setback results in an eftident house layout. The subject renovation/reconstruction will use the same building first story footprints and building foundations. The extrusion of the third story to the front setback give a break on the building e/evations which enhances the architectural look. In order to maintain the maximum front seiback at 25 feet and to have the proposed architectural design, the �rst floor waUs and foundation need to move 1.2 feet toward the inside of the parcel, which it makes the proposed renovation and reconstruction impractical. The front building setback of the majority of the residences a/ong the west Eldorado Avenue, are below the maximum allowed setback A similar setback reduction was approved in the past to the residence located at 1001 E/dorado Avenue under application No. FLS2004-11073. SIDE SETBACK: i. The reduction in side setbadc will allow for the preservation of enisting vegetation which could not otherwise be preserved. All of the existing trees are proposed to remain and to be protected during construction. The proposed side setback reduction is only for the second and third story ond it varies from 0 to 1 foot. The proposed side south setback is the same as the previous building, recently demolished, which it olso had the north side setback reduced from 5 feet to approximate 3.5 feet for ihe third story. The proposed first story building south (side) setback will respect the minimum required set6ack of 5 feet. The proposed north (side) setback wil! respect the minimum required setback of 5 feet for a/l ihree stories. . The roof overhang is on the third story at approximate 31 feet above the first finish floor elevation and does not adverse impact any existing vegetations. �. . , .. �, � �A � �. f y . a . t a L 1�"-� .. , y . . 4 , e y �� - �� `� �� R � ��"�' °I� i . � �' ' � � � . j��_� .� , � � ..�,, � ,� � ' � � ��y�,,. -,� r7. !^ .. i _ � � . �_ � �� .'1 ' + r J. � . f` # � .. �••4 � • � � , _ 3 e .� . � . �� ! �SI p � �- k kS� � � 1 � � 1f �� 'y�� - • I � �� 1 R k "�! � * , �' ..,� �'�, r �;. �` , : � _. _ - .�, ��. - J�, ; . �}� � � � � ., , . 1 a �' �` � I� ��k�f �. . it �. °i � . 4 ,..,�� M . � .' � y ��'� + t" i � w .�� " �'' ! '� � � t �� 1`.' � .i�� ° �� ds ' i �i � �,.AY � q � '�[' ��; r� � �i � ? 'f,s'"' 'd� ' �� {� � ,sF•• '� ��e �.i,r� , 15.#� . �4 � � �.�f' ¢ � ' � ,. , ' �` C.� t �w r; � � ' � , � � ^ r � ";�; R� � , . ", • �� ,��t .t ir� F� �,. _ •t� ' �: � i n, , ��;� � .� . . »� * .�' .:I •'�,��,� z�.. '�� ; � _ a, �� .� A. t'�r4 � -, i +,�, �L... ��` �.�+ "� �'� .pf � . : i. .�, i i^ � �r's +'i'" • !f�' ��'� ,�i. � , � � ,��,'°-ri}'� � , - �► � z� ;.,.� ' �V= # ,� ' � , � ,.�ar � . � ,��d'� � � � .'wi • � ° "� �'�e�� . ' � � '„^ .: ' . � ,.. ,. r -` . � j �rR � �' � �y.. � _ `� �i t ., ,t* � � �i��:: .. r' r> �, "-�' �.° � - - o.� i � y y� � �!i�►� � � �� .s.. �� ;"' � r _. �� ,� i. °�, " �. �-� � ;� �' $ � � ..� i� " .� � � � ' �..'' � � � .� ,� �M�,e � � �; . �.� �� PqrY' " f i �a � f� � ��L � �f ' . n ' '�, ti ��' �� ;,!' '�� . `�^ti #� �. �.,�_.. . . � � � .� i +� �, 41- ''" � �*x"t'�, . r `�'► r ► - ' -_ r�.._ .� �� ;+� F : _ � � � : .� /� �» �.. �, r '�' � . � ''4�" q • ,� , t�:��. ��, �� ''� � i ��.w° � s .. � y� ' ��'.; � . � '. � Af \ i � a . � � ? � �° ti• ' ' t�!1� • '�°x �.s � ,'' 1.�1,11�1 - ,.� � �. � k L 1 � �� a Y �,,_ �. � � •,� �� ;�� , � � � :,� Y �''�`,'.e, � ; * , � 4 � �' � , � � � 1 R � � �+J� �4 i � , ' � � ' t � r, ' ' ��... T `ji° �i � � � �F ,�• *�y �� F� F''� a"�, •�� w y .. �, �fi +g4.�� * �Y : �<q�� ti ��, •' '`"w � �. ' � � , .. + ��, r p'� � +��';� �.r „r�., � � � • �� ; � � MMAI4 � � * _.Y, k � a' � � 1�, � �.;{ �....,� �� b'" �fi`i ` � � . ... . *�. � � �""' " �i;�a. _ " � ��.,�,� �''�' d . �� y �„ _t �,'•� "�';. �, � � � � � � w�;�� f � ,. �� ' �� ':. '1':i �_,. fi � "� r � �' � �� "'t i �"`� r �-�� }� -,�. �,�-rr�,�,�,d ��'�"�� a: �' � �� " � r � m� K"' �e , �� , � � * � x �. . � � �`� = � `��1! �� . �i � *".. {i .+',,' � �;. z' i.. �� " `" „* r� � ,� ��', .�; ��`� � � � t ' E, � "� � � y�.s `'«��,��„�� a� ,� _� � � 'ttt * � � a � �,d �` i T�� 'M ��. +•� �� .. 't��,� ��, �� .. 'i _ � ` -�'.3�.� t� � � ��. � . � . . .j '�� _. w a.��x t � � � � � � � '� ,�'F X . . . � . . �'Sy : , f 4 , � �� r k �' �� i� � � �� p. � . ` � «.��,.,;: � �� 'y ��_�, � �; � �� §.j.�� S�� ! F a-` � � �`a� � �� : ��4 . �'�^` z a T � A �.M. ,��` ' ,�, • � � �' �� `� , r -� �`,�' ��'�� g `. i,� �` "� •' � ;� F� � �� k � �� - � -h� � �S. �. : � � ,. � � �� `� � $ � � � x` 1t x . � , .' _ „u � �`" � � � �� - �� .F,�.�' � - i,j • y ' M'r,�' .. . :�... �. �` ` �� „, e �P"� � � '"r �. � � � ��. ."�: ' - � i �� ' :�: k� a w ��'rp,^��;� �� r� .y_ .. � - � ��i - r ` � � t : f�- } : � �.�� '' - � '- � ,�„�l.� s# "� �'� �M � . � € t '� � � ��' .� �'� �� P �� r - K � � �.: a1�:, • « .�rr1�`+.�`'?_�.. �' . .. -� .. �. � �a� ;:� � i � t� . , . . . � , . . � , .. , . . .. .� �d �` '�. . k'�Sj'gt b � � . 8 � "x k.:� �r . �: , #�.a • '� rr +�"�.. � �a � � �ye �� .,�"�, �'l . Ny ;p' . { � Y 3 � }'A.', � �, ' '. � .v h � ',.} �Y ;�� - ,w ,� �` . � , �'� � � iP� � �°�' �. k . . . S � '3 +d' *y �� +"e` v` w�" r .,�' . - .. �. - _ � �A� �"'^ � � _ . � . - `; ... . : , � �. � :` �. ,..�:;,� .,. _ � J�� .>�:; ,a..a �, . .,� � `y � ^q , `. � � \ i � \ � �, y � ' 4, ��,� � � , � �{i,�� , � -: � � ' \ �� . \ "• y . '� p \ \ P�' ;� tr � � ♦ Y ` � �� VF ? � , � �� ' 11 � � _ �i�V� ` �� `� � \� � � �y �` �' \ i �, ��`:, ��,. fa � N, � , . � �: f . � �� - , � ."� � tl _ . ,\ � # ;y �' � � �y.: '' 4� �R� �`, _r ? � � �. „� r f�' � f� ,\ `�µ� �.` . �, � %� �. �' F � q� ^+ � �E�� Y , � ''h � F `.. � �, . � � �`�W '�{�_ �^ ."� yMy E. � ..e.,��, .mr�' � � �� V� ��i �`' ':�' ��"' �'' ��. � �' ,� �� ,: � � ,� �.��# � . � � �_ e�; *� ��' ��' � � � T� � r� �� :a�' y� �" :� � � �' �� E :�i�� . .°�.�,, ��,., . ,� �� ,.�. �a �_a � �.t � s Y .0 : , #� � � � � . � � � Fx ,-�. � � , . �.. -.� : -� , , : ,; .: �5 „ � . ,. ., „�.:�. - . .:. :.., ; � a��:� . . , . .. � .: . � . . 0. ,. . .��- _ , �'e.� `: � .� � . . . ._..._": _'1 . . . . �. ..j;:. ��■° : ; �; � � ,, �,. ., �. _ � , �;�� , �. � . _ � �� _ F _ , , , °_ �., `�' � , �.�i��'i� -, , � - f, „ . , �i� � _ l ^ , f�� , . �� ,_ . . , , � .:. "��„ ��,� . �; ,� �., .. t� � , . G • �, ' ` ;�,�,. � � ` � ��,-��,� � `� � � .,� _ ;. ��,�w�i��* �, �',.m. �,�- . a;,� :�r� �` °' * '�► , ...� �' <�� , ' *� f, __ ,,, � � �� '�'r . � � � ".r` � �� e` ��.� k �" "�; � �� . T"' , ' a.. �" . >Y. t$., :' ., j. � . � . .N'"r ,+ M;�� : � � y � �4 . ... � �� " 9 a j ��. ! � . . � .A�. . � . 5 �* �.: r�� . .. . . . � F �l . � t�+ aI.'� .` ..i�.. "'is ...'� j# �` �.. � _if � ;yy�l, � P2 I�� *� • � �'` .� � *•' � nvm� . . . . . � y� �� '}. �� , . . � .� �� ... . � M�„ '., w " , . . r 'i �s . � . , - ��.- ' � � , � '� ' K`�,r,. > . , , .. . � � � �.' . .. � � � h r.u., :« . ,a'` � !�u � ��` : F .. �-> _ � �.;�,�, ,�--r� � ' 1 � 1 � _ �:.�. .... : ..R � . 1 1 1 1 ' � 1 1 � r.� �. � ��. �� . . � : �,Ni�� ; , ... :, -._. , x .� �