Loading...
07/24/2013 MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER July 24, 2013 Present: Duane Schultz Chair James E. Strickland Vice-Chair Michael Boutzoukas Board Member Sheila Cole Board Member Sue A. Johnson Board Member Michael J. Riordon Board Member Wayne Carothers Board Member Also Present: Andy Salzman Attorney for the Board Camilo Soto Assistant City Attorney Nicole Sprague Secretary to the Board Patricia O. Sullivan Board Reporter The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. The Chair outlined the procedures and stated any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty days of the execution of the order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — June 26, 2013 Member Johnson moved to approve the minutes of the regular Municipal Code Enforcement Board meeting of June 26, 2013, as submitted in written summation to each board member. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 3. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD RE ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 Case 30-13 Housh Ghovaee 300 S Belcher Road Graffiti Prohibited/Exterior Surfaces— Schaar No one was present to represent the owner. Inspector Shelby Schaar provided a PowerPoint presentation. Notices of violation were issued on May 8 and 28, 2013, following the first inspection. Violations at 300 S. Belcher Road relate to graffiti and exterior surfaces. Property photographs on April 17, 2012 showed exterior surfaces with graffiti on the rear, side, and front of the building and mismatched paint. Property Code Enforcement 2013-07-24 1 photographs on June 28, 2013 showed no corrective action had occurred and mildew was visible. Property photographs on July 5, 2013, showed paint remained mismatched on exterior surfaces and graffiti was painted over, although a shadow of the graffiti on the building's north side remains noticeable. An active business operates in this highly visible building on a major City road. No corrective actions were done for more than a year, but recently the property owner made minor concessions to bring the building into compliance. Area graffiti activity has diminished. No member of the public wished to speak on this issue. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Schaar said the graffiti violation had been corrected and she requested a declaration of violation. She recommended compliance for the mismatched paint and mildewed exterior surface by August 8, 2013, or a fine of$200 per day be imposed. At a meeting with the owner, scheduled for July 29, 2013, Inspector Schaar will advise him of today's board rulings and corrective actions necessary to meet compliance. No member of the public wished to speak on this issue. Assistant City Attorney Camilo Soto submitted composite exhibits. Member Boutzoukas moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation related to mismatched paint and mildew on exterior surfaces on or before August 8, 2013. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$200 per day for each day the violation continues to exist and to enter an order that no fine be imposed against the Respondent for the violation related to graffiti. If the Respondent repeats the violation related to graffiti, the Board may order a fine of up to $500 for each day the graffiti violation continues to exist after the Respondent is notified of the repeat violation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on July 24, 2013, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that exterior surfaces are mildewed and have mismatched and fading paint, with graffiti bleeding through. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section(s) 3-1502.113, as referred in the Affidavit in this case. Code Enforcement 2013-07-24 2 ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code by August 8, 2013. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$200.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Shelby Schaar, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of July 2013, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. AND This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on July 24, 2013, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the testimony and evidence received, it is evident the condition related to graffiti existed; however, it is further evident this condition was corrected prior to this hearing. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) was/were in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section(s) 3-1504 as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER Code Enforcement 2013-07-24 3 It is the Order of this Board that no fine will be imposed against the Respondent(s). The Board further orders that if Respondent(s) repeats/repeat the violations referenced herein, the Board may order the Respondent(s) to pay a fine up to $500.00 for each day each violation exists after the Respondent(s) is/are notified of the repeat violations. Should the violations reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of July 2013, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.2 Case 31-13 Elijah Jones Jr. 1312 Woodbine Street Home Occupation — Marked Vehicle/Res Grass Parking/Hauling Trailer— Franco Inspector Peggy Franco provided a PowerPoint presentation. Notices of violation were issued on May 8 and 28, 2013, following the first inspection. Violations at 1312 Woodbine Street relate to a truck with advertising for the home business in the driveway, a vehicle on the lawn, and an unscreened hauling trailer between the house and right-of-way. Property photographs on May 24 and June 11, 2013 showed a truck with advertising for the home business parked in the driveway, a trailer with a boat parked on the lawn, and a hauling trailer parked in the driveway between the house and right-of-way without required screening. Property owner Elijah Jones Jr. admitted to the violations, indicating that his son lives in the house and the violations have been corrected. Michael Jones said time had slipped by after he received notice of the violations and spoke with Inspector Franco. He said he made the corrections as soon as he understood them but did not feel they should be violations. He said the Code is not written in layman's terms and said he felt it was entrapment and the City's fault that the Code is difficult to understand. No other member of the public wished to speak on this issue. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Code Enforcement 2013-07-24 4 Inspector Franco said the violations have been corrected and requested a declaration of violation. In response to questions, she reviewed Code requirements for business signage on vehicles, and boat and hauling trailer storage on residential properties. Elijah Jones Jr. said he had thought the sign on the truck was allowed, the boat was legally parked, and the hauling trailer was permitted, as it was backed into the driveway. No member of the public wished to speak on this issue. Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits. Member Boutzoukas moved to enter an order that no fine be imposed against the Respondent. If the Respondent repeats the violation, the Board may order a fine of up to $500.00 for each day the violation continues to exist after the Respondent is notified of the repeat violation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on July 24, 2013, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the testimony and evidence received, it is evident conditions existed related to a truck with advertising for the home business parked in the driveway, a vehicle parked on the lawn, and an unscreened hauling trailer parked in the driveway between the house and right-of- way, however, it is further evident these conditions were corrected prior to this hearing. The Respondent(s) was/were present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) was/were in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section(s) 3-1102.A.7, 3-1407.A.5, 3-1407.A.2.c, and 3-1407.A.3.c as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of this Board that no fine will be imposed against the Respondent(s). The Board further orders that if Respondent(s) repeats/repeat the violations referenced herein, the Board may order the Respondent(s) to pay a fine up to $500.00 for each day each violation exists after the Respondent(s) is/are notified of the repeat violations. Should the violations reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's Code Enforcement 2013-07-24 5 decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of July 2013, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.3 Case 32-13 Andrew Jordan Jr. Jordan, Irene E. Est. 1353 Overlea Street Door &Window Openings— Franco Inspector Peggy Franco provided a PowerPoint presentation. Notices of violation were issued on March 20 and May 17, 2013, following the first inspection. The violation at 1353 Overlea Street relates to a boarded window and glass slats missing from jalousie windows. Property photographs on May 20, June 11, and July 12, 2013 showed the house's front window is boarded and glass slats are missing from several jalousie windows. Joint property owner Andrew Jordan Jr. admitted to the violation. No member of the public wished to speak on this issue. Member Cole moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Franco recommended compliance by August 23, 2013, or a fine of$100 per day be imposed. She said special circumstances exist. Andrew Jordan Jr. said he learned several days ago about the violation and today's meeting. He said his mother passed away in 1985 and left the house to her 9 children; the property did not go through probate. He said several of his siblings subsequently have died, including his sister who previously oversaw maintenance of the house. He said another sister and her son, who have mental disabilities, live in the house. He said he is struggling with personal health issues and requested 60 days so that his sister can pay for the window, which has been ordered. He said only one of his siblings works and none can help pay for maintenance. Inspector Franco did not object to the time extension. She reported she must be accompanied by a Police Officer when she visits the property due to the occupant's mental health issues. She said family help is needed to help bring the property into compliance. Code Enforcement 2013-07-24 6 In response to a concern, Attorney Soto said the property owners were properly noticed regarding the violation and today's meeting. No member of the public wished to speak on this issue. Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits. Member Riordon moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before September 23, 2013. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$100 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on July 24, 2013, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that the front window is boarded and glass slats are missing from jalousie windows. The Respondent(s) was/were present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section(s) 3-1502.C.1, 3-1502.C.3, & 3-1502.C.4, as referred in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code by September 23, 2013. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of $100.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Peggy Franco, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Code Enforcement 2013-07-24 7 Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of July 2013, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.4 Case 33-13 Chuck Williams 1431 Carlos Avenue Residential Grass Parking — Franco No one was present to represent the owner. Inspector Peggy Franco provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on April 18, 2013, following the first inspection. The violation at 1431 Carlos Avenue relates to vehicles parked on the grass in a residential neighborhood. Property photographs on May 24, 2013 showed one vehicle parked in the middle of the front lawn. Property photographs on June 7, 2013, showed two vehicles parked on the front lawn. Ms. Franco reported today a vehicle with its hood open is parked at an angle on the property's grass. No member of the public wished to speak on this issue. Member Strickland moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Franco recommended compliance by August 1, 2013, or a fine of$100 per day be imposed. In response to a question, she said the property is not homesteaded and she has not heard from the property owner; she did have contact with two women on the property. The certified mail was returned unclaimed; a resident at the property signed for the Affidavit of Service on May 6, 2013. Attorney Soto said the property owner was properly noticed regarding the violation and today's meeting. No member of the public wished to speak on this issue. Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits. Member Carothers moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before August 1, 2013. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$150 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on July 24, 2013, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: Code Enforcement 2013-07-24 8 FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that vehicles were parked on the grass. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section(s) 3-1407.A.5, as referred in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code by August 1, 2013. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$150.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Peggy Franco, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of July 2013, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.5 Case 34-13 -WITHDRAWN Carol A. Roberts 1430 S Hillcrest Avenue Permit Required — Swinton Case 34-13 was withdrawn. 4.6 Case 35-13 Wrobel Industries Inc. Tre Ferruggia Family Trust#1927 1927 N. Highland Avenue Code Enforcement 2013-07-24 9 Exterior Surfaces/Door &Window Openings/Roof Maintenance - Phillips No one was present to represent the owners. Inspector Julie Phillips provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on April 4, 2013, following the first inspection. Violations at 1927 N. Highland Avenue relate to exterior surfaces, boarded windows, and roof maintenance. Property photographs on April 3, 2012 showed that exterior surfaces are mildewed and have peeling and failing paint, many windows are boarded, and vegetation is growing out of the roof. No member of the public wished to speak on this issue. Member Jonson moved to find the Respondent(s) in violation of the City of Clearwater Code of Ordinances as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Phillips recommended compliance by September 2, 2013, or a fine of$100 per day per violation be imposed. She has received one call from a neighbor regarding the property but has had no contact with the property owners. No member of the public wished to speak on this issue. Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits. Member Riordon moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before September 2, 2013. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$100 per day per violation for each day each violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on July 24, 2013, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that exterior surfaces are mildewed and have peeling and failing paint, many windows are boarded, and vegetation is growing out of the roof. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section(s) 3-1502.113, 3-1502.C.1, 3-1502.C.3, 3-1502.C.4, 3-1502.D.1 & 3-1502.D.3, as referred in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER Code Enforcement 2013-07-24 10 It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code by September 2, 2013. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$100.00 per day per violation for each day each violation continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Julie Phillips, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of July 2013, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 5.1 Case 18-13 —Affidavit of Compliance Goodkids Village Inc. 2881 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Signage w/o Permits—Weaver 5.2 Case 22-13 —Affidavit of Compliance Jose & Josefina Rodriguez 600 Vine Avenue Exterior Surfaces - Franco Member Johnson moved to accept the Affidavits of Compliance for Cases 18-13 and 22- 13. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 6. NEW BUSINESS: 6.1 Case 26-12 - Fine Reduction Request First M Corp. Defined Benefit Pension Plan & Trust Minkoff, Sue & David Tre 708 Chestnut Street Exterior Surfaces -Weaver Code Enforcement 2013-07-24 11 No one was present to represent the owners. Inspector Mary Jo Weaver said the property was brought into compliance on April 23, 2013. Staff supports a reduction to the fine, which totals $11,000. Administration costs are $1,667.30. In response to a question regarding the property owners' request for a fine reduction, Inspector Weaver said she never was aware that the property owners did not understand that the property was subject to a fine when they did not bring the property into compliance by the deadline imposed by the board. Discussion ensued with comments that Ms. Minkoff had appeared before the board twice, accompanied by engineers associated with a proposal to develop the property. It was suggested that the delay in meeting compliance was not intentional and the property owners have the means to pay administration costs. No member of the public wished to speak on this issue. Member Riordon moved to enter an order reducing the fine for Case 26-12 to administration costs of$1,667.30, payable within 30 days or the lien will revert to its original amount. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. The Municipal Code Enforcement Board has considered the Respondents' request for reconsideration of fine at a hearing held on July 24, 2013, and based upon the evidence presented, enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. After considering the request for reduction of fine filed by the Respondent(s) and considering that the property is now in compliance, it is evident that a reduction in fine is appropriate in the above-referenced case. It is the Order of this Board that the fine previously imposed in the Order of the Board dated March 27, 2013, as recorded in O.R. Book 18025, Pages 414 -415, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby reduced to administration costs of$1,667.30 payable to the Petitioner by August 23, 2013. If the reduced fine is not paid within the time specified in this Order, a lien in the original amount of$11,000.00 shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of July 2013, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 7. NUISANCE ABATEMENT LIEN FILINGS: Javier Garcia PNU2013-00378 211 S Highland Avenue 14-29-15-18972-001-0110 $746.00 Curtis McAffee & Lily McCoy PNU2013-00085 404 Blanche B Littlejohn Trl. 09-29-15-37422-002-0080 $324.91 Code Enforcement 2013-07-24 12 Chow, Bih S Est. 201 S San Remo Avenue 14- 29 -15- 10476- 004 -0150 PNU2013 -00208 $360.95 Kristina Coleman PNU2013 -00563 118 N. Hillcrest Avenue 15- 29 -15- 22464- 000 -0020 $435.00 Okuboye Julius AMD REV LIV Trust PNU2011 -02031 605 Marshall Street 10- 29 -15- 61740- 002 -0050 $200.00 Angeliki Kiriazis PNU2012 -02145 1018 Sunnydale Drive 03- 29 -15- 86778 - 000 -0380 $200.00 Victor M. Ulloa PNU2012 -00989 1364 Overlea Street 10- 29 -15- 69066 - 004 -0100 $200.00 Member Cole moved to accept the Nuisance Abatement Lien filings. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA Attorney for the Board Andy Salzman said the procedure for red light camera appeals will be the same as for Public Hearings. If the board denies the appeal, the minimum fine will be $158 plus the board will determine the amount of additional administration costs to impose, up to $250. If necessary, the board may enforce its time limits for hearings. 8. ADJOURN: The meeting adjourned at 2:35 p.m. Chair Municipal Code Enforcement Board Code Enforcement 2013 -07 -24 13