LUP2013-06003� �l�ar��t�r
_ ��..��._:•""`,,.�' `.✓"`��...�'
;, �✓_�.-_.
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
CASE:
REQUEST:
GENERAL DATA:
Agent... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Applicant / Owner ..............
Location ... ........................
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
August 20, 2013
G.1.
LUP2013-06003
To amend the present Future Land Use Map designation from Residential Low (RL) to
Residential Urban (RU).
James M. Vernon, Esq., P.E.
Central Realty, Inc.
1569 and 1571 Sunset Point Road, approximately 0.24 mile east of the intersection of
Sunset Point Road and N. Highland Avenue.
Property Size .................... 0.37 acres
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
This case involves a 0.37 acre property located at 1569 and 1571
Sunset Point Road, which is approximately 0.24 miles east of the
intersection of Sunset Point Road and N. Highland Avenue. The
property is comprised of two parcels, which are currently vacant.
In February 2007, the City received a petition for annexation for
the property, which at the time was a single parcel (ANX2007-
02005, annexation effective May 2007). At the time the request
for annexation was received, there was a single family home
located on the parcel, but it was demolished in April 2007 while
still in Pinellas County. The City has received building permit
applications for a single family home on each parcel, but in order
to develop the parcels, the applicant must amend the present
Future Land Use Map designation from Residential Low (RL) to
Residential Urban (RU).
Request:
The request is to change the property's Future Land Use Map
designation of Residential Low (RL) to Residential Urban (RU).
The property is currently designated Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) in the Zoning Atlas, and there is no need to
amend the zoning designation as the LMDR District is
compatible with both Residential Low (RL) and Residential
Urban (RU) future land use designations. The existing and
proposed use is residential. The change in the Future Land Use
Map designation will result in sufficient densities to allow the
owners to build a single house on each parcel. The applicant is
aware that a minor lot line adjustment will be required to legally
create two conforming lots for development.
.�,�,� � � .� �D., � ��.R . � ,�1
��,� F�.N�
_�,� u_��.,,, �
s.�.��� � � �_ _p '
,�wp � �.,�,.,_. PROJECT
��, _. 3llE
� � uw �:�, � � g §,ye.rsn
; $ � � y � �rE,
s - � �,..o�
E4;�N.� .�,6-
�
i �ocarrorv a�AP i
F.3.
Y l��L�� ►1'�ll.l Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Review
- =�v��.-��`/�...` �:�u� v .,, . .
Vicinity Characteristics:
The applicant's property is surrounded on all sides
by single family residential homes. Approximately
375 linear feet, or 74 percent of the perimeter
property boundary, abuts properties with a Future
Land Use designation of Residential Urban (RU).
The remainder abuts properties with Residential Low
(RL) Future Land Use designations (see Figure 1
below).
Figure 1
Abutting Future Land Use
Designations
26 %
74%
�
■ Residential Urban
(RU)
Residential Low (RL)
The minimum lot size for detached dwellings in the
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district is
5,000 square feet, and lots must be at least 50 feet
wide. Lots in the vicinity of the subject property
range from 65 to 100 feet wide, and 7,860 to 11,360
square feet in total size. If the subject parcel is
subdivided into two equal parcels, each new parcel
would be 8,100 square feet in size and 67.5 feet
wide, which is consistent with the character of the
neighborhood and exceeds the minimum standards of
the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
District.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
LONG RANGE DIVISION
A complete listing of the surrounding uses, Future Land Use Map designations, and Zoning Atlas
designations are shown in Table l. In addition, a comparison between the uses and intensities
allowed by the present and proposed Future Land Use Map designations appears in Table 2.
Community Development Board — August 20, 2013
LUP2013-06003- Page 2 of 8
r��eGR� Tt �Ll.� Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Review
��.�: ., �.. . .
Table 1. Su�rounding Future Land Use and Zoning Designations
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
LONG RANGE DIVISION
Existin Use s FLUM Desi ation Zonin Atlas Desi ation
Direction
North: Single Family Homes Residential Urban (RU) Low Medium Density
Residential LMDR
East: Single Family Homes Residential Urban (RU) Low Medium Density
Residential LMDR
South: Single Family Homes Residential Low (RL) Low Medium Density
Residential LMDR
West: Single Family Homes Residential Urban (RU) Low Medium Density
Residential LMDR
Table 2. Uses and Intensities Allowed by Present and Proposed Future Land Use Designations
Primary Uses:
Maximum
Maximum
Consistent Zoning Districts:
REVIEW CRITERIA:
Low Density Residential
5 Dwelling Units Per Acre
FAR 0.40; ISR 0.65
Low Density Residential (LDR);
Low Medium Density Residential
(LMDR)
Urban Low Density Residential
7.5 Dwelline Units Per Acre
FAR 0.40; ISR 0.65
Low Medium Density Residential
(LMDR); Medium Density
Residential (MDR)
No amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or Future Land Use Map shall be recommended for
approval or receive a final action of approval unless it complies with the standards contained in
Section 4-603.F, Community Development Code. Table 3 below depicts the consistency of the
proposed amendment with the standards as per Section 4-603.F:
Table 3. Consistency with Community Development Code Standards
F.1 The amendment will further implementation of the
Comprehensive Plan consistent with the goals, policies
and objectives contained in the Plan.
F.2 The amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions
of the Comprehensive Plan.
F.3 The available uses, if applicable, to which the property
may be put are appropriate to the property in question and
compatible with existing and planned uses in the area.
F.4 Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the
properiy.
F.5 The amendment will not adversely affect the natural
environment.
F.6 The amendment will not adversely impact the use of
nronertv in the immediate area.
Community Development Board — August 20, 2013
LUP2013-06003- Page 3 of 8
X
X
X
X
X
X
a p�r n+ �+ PLANNING � DEVELOPMENT
� C vlai �[�L�l Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Review LONG RANGE DIVISION
L � ���,;.�:w
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
Consistency with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan (Sections 4-603.F.1 and 4-603.F.2J
Recommended Findin�s of Fact:
Applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan which support
the proposed amendment include:
Goal A.2 A sufficient variety and amount of Future Land Use categories shall be provided to
accommodate public demand and promote infill development.
Goal A.4 The City shall not permit development to occur unless an adequate level of service is
available to accommodate the impacts of development. Areas in which the impact of existing
development exceeds the desired levels of service will be upgraded consistent with the taxget
dates for infrastructure improvements included in the applicable functional plan element.
Policy A.6.4.1 The development or redevelopment of small parcels [less than one (1) acre] which
are currently receiving an adequate level of service shall be specifically encouraged by
administration of land development and concurrency management regulatory systems as a
method of promoting urban infill.
Objective B.1.4 The City shall specifically consider the existing and planned LOS of the road
network affected by a proposed development, when considering an amendment to the land use
map, rezoning, subdivision plat, or site plan approval.
Recommended Conclusions of Law:
The request does not conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the Clearwater
Comprehensive Plan and furthers said plan as indicated in the following. The proposed
designation of Residential Urban (RU) could result in the development of two single family
homes that are compatible with the uses and adjacent parcel sizes in the area, and would be
promoting urban infill. In addition, the proposal does not degrade the level of service for public
facilities below the adopted standards (a detailed public facilities analysis follows in this report).
Consistency with the Countywide Plan Rules
Recommended Findings of Fact:
Section 2.3.3.1.5 of the Countywide Plan Rules states that the purpose of the Residential Urban
(RU) future land use classification is to depict those areas of the county that are now developed,
or appropriate to be developed, in an urban low density residential manner; and to recognize such
areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban qualities and
natural resource characteristics of such areas. Section 2.3.3.1.5 also states that the Residential
Urban (RU) future land use classification is generally appropriate to those locations where use
and development characteristics are urban residential in nature; and in areas serving as a
transition between more suburban and more urban residential areas.
The subject property is located adjacent to Residential Urban (RU) and Residential Low (RL)
future land use categories on the south side of Sunset Point Road, a signalized arterial road, in an
Community Development Board — August 20, 2013
LUP2013-06003- Page 4 of 8
� �T } 4+ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
� C��l ���t��l Level III Comprehensive Plan AmendmentApplication Review LONGRANGEDIVISION
L �vy :
area that contains primarily residential uses. Future use of the subject property as two single
family homes is consistent with the purposes of both the adjacent Residential Low (RL) and
Residential Urban (RU) future land use categories and is compatible with surrounding properties
and the neighborhood.
Recommended Conclusions of Law:
The proposed Future Land Use Map amendment is consistent with the purpose and locational
characteristics of the Countywide Plan Rules.
Compatibility with Surrounding Property/Character of the City & Neighborhood [Section
4-603.F.3 and Section 4-603.F.6]
Recommended Findings of Fact:
Existing surrounding uses consist of single family homes. The future land use designations of
surrounding properties include Residential Urban (RU) and Residential Low (RL). The proposed
use of the subject property as single family residential homes is compatible with the surrounding
properties and neighborhood.
The proposed Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use designation permits 7.5 dwelling units
per acre and a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.40. The Future Land Use designations of surrounding
properties include Residential Urban (RU) (7.5 dwelling units per acre; FAR 0.40) and
Residential Low (RL) (5 dwelling units per acre; FAR 0.40).
Recommended Conclusions of Law:
The Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use classification requested is consistent with the
surrounding future land use classifications that exist in the vicinity of the subject property. The
proposed future land use designation will allow the development of two single family homes at a
density and scale that is consistent with existing residential uses in the vicinity of the subject
property. As such, the proposed amendment will allow development that is in character with the
surrounding area.
The proposed Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use designation is in character with the
overall Future Land Use Map designations in the area. Further, the proposal is compatible with
surrounding uses and consistent with the character of the surrounding properties and
neighborhood.
Sufficiency of Public Facilities [Section 4-603.F.4]
Recommended Findings of Fact:
To assess the sufficiency of public facilities needed to support potential development on the
property, the maximum development potential of the property under the present and requested
Future Land Use Map designations was analyzed (see Table 4). The request for amendment to
the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Map category would increase the amount of
development potential allowed on the site (see Table 4 below).
Community Development Board — August 20, 2013
LUP2013-06003- Page 5 of 8
� li������Ll.l Level III Com rehensive Plan Amendment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
p PP LONG RANGE DMSION
Table 4. Develo ment Potential or Existin & Pro osed FLUMDesi nations
Net Change
Site Area 0.37 AC 037 AC
(16,200 SF) (16,200 SF)
Maximum Development 1 DU 2 DU 1 DU
Potential 0.40 FAR 0.40 FAR 0.0 FAR
Abbreviations:
FLUM — Future Land Use Map DUs — Dweliing Units
AC — Acres FAR — Floor Area Ratio
SF — S uare feet
As shown in Table 5 below, the proposed change will not degrade public facilities and services
below acceptable levels.
Table S. Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis
Net Capacity
Chan e Available?
Public Facility/Service Present FLUM Requested FLUM
Desi nation "RL" Desi nation "RU"
Streets 19 Trips 25 Trips 6 Yes
Potable Water 260.4 GPD 520.8 GPD 260.4 Yes
Wastewater 234.36 GPD 468.72 GPD 23436 Yes
Solid Waste 2.53 Tons/Year 5.07 Tons/Year 2.53 Yes
0.009
Parkland 0.009 Acres3 0.018 Acres3 Acres Yes
Notes:
1. Based on average daily trips per acreage figure, Pinellas County Countywide Plan Rules.
• Residential Low (RL) — 50 vehicle trips per day per acre.
• Residential Urban (RU) — 68 vehicle trips per day per acre.
2. GPD — Gallons per day.
3. Based on 4.0 acres of arkland er 1,000 ersons and 2.2 ersons er unit.
As shown in Table 6 below, there is a slight increase in the potential maximum daily trips
associated with the request for amendment to the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use
designation, which would not impact the operating level of service for Sunset Point Road. The
change in Future Land Use designation is also projected to increase the PM Peak Hour trips from
959 to 960, which will not affect the operating level of service. The segment of Sunset Point
Road is currently operating at a Level of Service D, which is the adopted roadway level of
service standard.
Community Development Board — August 20, 2013
LUP2013-06003- Page 6 of 8
Y li�e[i�l TT�l�el Level III Comprehensive Plan Amendment Appiication Review
. . ... �s�`'..x'. , . �
Table 6. Maximum Potential Traffic
Sunset Point Road (Edgewater Dr. to Keene Rd.)
Potential Additional Maximum Daily Trips
Potential Additional Maximum PM Peak Hoi
Roadway Volume (Annual Average Daily)
Roadway Volume (PM Peak Hour)�
Roadway Level of Service PM Peak Hour
Adonted Roadwav Level of Service Standard
Existing
Conditions
N/A
N/A
10,0 08
958
PLANNING & DEVELAPMENT
LONG RANGE DIVISION
Current Proposed
FLUM' FLUMZ
19 25
2 2
10,099 10,105
959 960
D Peak Hour
Net New
6
Abbreviations and Notes:
N/A = Not Applicable.
FLiJM = Future Land Use Map, Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
1. Based on PPC calculations of 50 trips per day per acre in the Residential Low (RL) future land use category.
2. Based on PPC calculations of 68 trips per day per acre in the Residential Urban (RU) future land use category.
3. Based on MPO K-factor of 0.095.
4. Source: Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2012 Level of Service Report.
5. Based on a comparison between the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization 2012 Level of Service
Revort and the 2012 Florida Department of Transportation Quality/Level of Service Handbook. _
Recommended Conclusions of Law:
Based upon the findings of fact, it is determined that the traffic generated by the proposed
amendment will not result in the degradation of the existing level of service on Sunset Point
Road. There is a slight increase in demand for potable water and generation of wastewater and
solid waste, but there is adequate capacity to accommodate the maximum demand generated by
the proposed amendment. Furthermore, parkland and recreation facilities will not be affected by
the proposed amendment.
Impact on Natural Resources [Section 4-603.F.5]
Recommended Findings of Fact:
Based on current GIS data from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Wetland
Inventory, there are no wetlands located on the subject property. However, there are trees on site.
Recommended Conclusions of Law:
Any proposed development is required to be compliant with the City's tree preservation,
landscaping and storm water management requirements.
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Approval of the Future Land Use Map amendment does not guarantee the right to develop the
subject property. The Future Land Use Map amendment is subject to approval by the Pinellas
Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning
Authority. Based on the size of the property, review and approval by the Florida Department of
Economic Opportunity (Division of Community Planning) is not required. The property owner
must comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the time development permits are
requested, including transportation concurrency provisions of the Concurrency Management
System in Division 9, Community Development Code.
Community Development Board — August 20, 2013
LUP2013-06003- Page 7 of 8
� Cl�.t�l 1`!' �L�.1 Level III Com rehensive Plan Amendment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
p PP LONG RANGE DIVISION
y . . . -.. �.�$��,¢,'.,€.S ' ' . .
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the foregoing, the Planning and Development Department recommends the following
action:
Recommend APPROVAL of the request for Future Land Use Map amendment from the
Residential Low (RL) classification to the Residential Urban (RU) classification.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: �-•� �����%�
Andrew Hayslip
Planner II
ATTACHMENTS: Resume
Photographs of Site and Vicinity
Community Development Board — August 20, 2013
LUP2013-06003- Page 8 of 8
View looking east at the subject property, 1569 Sunset Point Rd.
from East Dr.
�.- `:,'
� �, ����� �,.,
View looking southerly on East Dr.
�. ' .� �,
' �� r ��_ ��� � �., _
_. ?, yFy
View looking west from subject property at 1569 Sunset Point
Rd. (across East Dr.)
- +`�"i�31�3't�1zt�+� F.'F i,��
}'
View looking south of 1569 Sunset Point Rd. from East Dr.
View looking northerly on East Dr. towards Sunset Point Rd.
�;' �I��'�R'JV ^• t.�'F!1 L N.rf+ . . � '�l�L�i �
� ✓ ''
� i ! �� 7 5'�'i '+Y` .�. � ' �
-...r� � _ �h..�i-f n�it�� �� i��'�..i.�s�%.(. .
View looking south towards subject properiy at 1569 Sunset
Point Rd.
LUP2013-06003
Central Realty, Inc.
1569 & 1571 Sunset Point Road
View looking westerly along Sunset Point Rd.
r �.
,x,�„r `•a.., ti ` �, ��_ §. ,�d,_ el?
� x� � �
View looking north from subject properiy at 1569 Sunset Point Rd.
arrkxc :. . _
View looking north from subject property at 1571 Sunset Point Rd.
View looking easterly along Sunset Point Rd.
a,� �� ��� �. � ' �` ,� ` �,r�'�'i�
'� "JE' '�t'x.- � `� �'`�f�.W ?j�r`�~` :. "+1� ' ; �
, si
,;
w .. .. .,... _ . .�. . . .wu-...... ..;m.«,._._svNk .. . , ,._.. ._ ...... .
. .. . . , ^
. _.. ... .... .
%,! � �.� . . ' .... � y;.. ,
�...... � - -- .
View looking south at subject property at 1571 Sunset Point Rd.
View looking east of subject property at 1571 Sunset Point Rd.
LUP2013-06003
Central Realty, Inc.
1569 & 1571 Sunset Point Road
ORDINANCE NO. 8435-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE
CITY, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHEASTERN CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF
EAST DRIVE AND SUNSET POINT ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY '/4 MILE EAST OF NORTH HIGHLAND
AVENUE, CONSISTING OF LOT 1, BLOCK A,
CLEARWATER HIGHLANDS UNIT A, ACCORDING TO
THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 28, AT PAGE 95, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 1569 AND 1571 SUNSET POINT ROAD;
FROM RESIDENTIAL LOW (RL), TO RESIDENTIAL
URBAN (RU); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the
comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable,
proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now,
therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the
City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter
described property as follows:
Property
Lot 1, Block A, Clearwater Highlands
Unit A, according to the map or plat thereof
As recorded in Plat Book 28, Page 95 of the
Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
(LU P2013-06003)
Land Use Cateqory
From: Residential Low (RL)
To: Residential Urban (RU)
The map attached as Exhibit "A" is hereby incorporated by reference.
Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent
with the City's comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, subject
to the approval of the land use designation by the Pinellas County Board of County
Commissioners, and subject to a determination by the State of Florida, as appropriate,
of compliance with the applicable requirements of the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, pursuant to
Ordinance No.8435 -13
§ 163.3189, Florida Statutes. The Community Development Coordinator is authorized
to transmit to the Pinellas County Planning Council an application to amend the
Countywide Plan in order to achieve consistency with the Future Land Use Plan
Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan as amended by this ordinance.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
George N. Cretekos
Mayor
Approved as to form: Attest:
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Rosemarie Call
Assistant City Attorney City Clerk
Ordinance No.8435 -13
�xnibit A
C:1Users1E11en.Ayo4AppDataU.ocaiuvficrosoftlWindows\Temporary.Intemet FileslContent.0utlookl3ZK07KOJ�FLULUP2013-06003
(2).dcex
Andrew Hayslip
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
727-562-4626
andrew.havslip(u�myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Planner II, City of Clearwater, Clearwater, FL – May 2013-Current
Responsible for numerous aspects of the Growth Management Act of Florida such as comprehen-
sive planning, Future Land Use Plan amendments, rezonings, and annexations. Update Commu-
nity Development Code by Ordinance. Prepare staff reports for the City Council and Community
Development Board. Coordinate and manage various projects.
• Planner, URS Corporation, Tampa, FL – May 2012-May 2013
Assisted with data collection, analysis, and documentation of information required to conduct
Project Development and Environment (PD&E) studies for transportation planning projects.
Collected and analyzed socioeconomic, environmental, and land use data for reports and
presentations to local, state, and federal clients. Assisted with feasibility analyses and alternatives
evaluations for transportation and environmental planning projects.
• GIS Analyst/Research Associate, Center for Spatial Analysis, Fish and Wildlife
Research Institute (FWC), St. Petersburg, FL — June 2009-May 2012
Created, analyzed, and managed spatial data in collaboration with diverse research projects.
Provided essential GIS support to FWC, the United States Coast Guard, Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, and British Petroleum (BP) in response to the Deepwater Horizon Oil
Spill.
• Planner, Town of Leeds; Leeds, UT — June 2007- July 2008
Served as the principal planner for the Town of Leeds, Utah. Worked with citizens, developers,
and town government to ensure that development within the town promoted social,
environmental, and economic sustainability. Created, revised, and implemented land use
ordinances and resolutions. Coordinated a complete revision of the Town's 2005 Land Use
Ordinance; conducted research on socioeconomic, land use, transportation, and environmental
data and incorporated findings in the 2008 Land Use Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
EDUCATION
Master's Degree in Environmental Science and Policy, University of South Florida, Expected
2013
Bachelor of Science in Geography, Minor in Urban & Regional Planning, Florida State
University, 2007
MEMBERSHIPS AND PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Planning Association
American Planning Association – Florida Chapter
Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA)
;
�.:� I�anning �r. D�velo�m�nt �epartme�t
. .
_: `� �� ���� Co�n r�h��sive �lant A.����irr��nt A l�eat�c��
� ��
' Inel�rding Future Lanc� �Tse Mrxp Amerzr�rrzents
ALL APPLtCA7tCtNS ARE TO BE �€LLED dUT CQMPLE7�LY AND �ORRE£iLY, l�iVB SUSN{ITfED fN P�RSQN {Nfl FAX f)ft
DELiVER[ES} TCi THE AE.AIVNiNf &�EVELOPMENT D�PARTiV1ENi SY NOQN C3N THE SCHEi3l.1i.ER �JEAf�LIt'dE �ATE.
A T�TAL flF 11 CQMPlEfE SETS �F APPilCA?'f0�11 MAT�RfALS [1 i)RiGItdA�. AND 1Q COPIES} A,s 1tEQUiREU W[7�ilN ARE TO
8� Sl1BI1AtTTEQ Ft)R REViEW 8Y Tlif I3E1tELdPMEt�i7' #�VtE1�1t C�MMt�'EE. SUBSEQUEI�IT �ilBMt3l';�L �Oft TFfE
COMMUIVI7'Y QEVELORMEM B�ARD 114![tL REQ.iIIRE 15 GOMPL�TE SETS OF APPLICAT10iV NIATERiAiS {I ORiGt3�iAL AND
14 Cf3PtES�. PWi�I� AA1€3 AFPLlCAT10NS,RF�� REtiU1RED i"t} �E CC?LLATED, 51'AP�.ED 1�tVQ FOLDED ItdT� S@TS.
!T i� IiVCUItlI$ENT UPOAi iftE APPLI£A1VT TQ SUSMlT COMPlETE AfVi3 CORR�CT 11UFOR�EATiON. RNY 111tlSL�DlNG,
OEC€PTtVE, WCOlV1PLE7E flf� II�tCORR€GT.111[FORMATIt7i� iUTAY tNV,4LiQAi� Y0tlR APPLtCATt��t.
TiiE APPLICAt�i3", SY FtLi14J6 THl� APPI:lCAT!£)i!�, AGREES Tt] CONtP£Y W!T}-I ALL }'€PPLICABIE REQLfIREi�tiElVTS E�F T1if
COM MUiVliY t��Vf LOPM�IVT GOU E.
APPLICATIflN FEE: $88� Future Cand Use Nlap Am�ndmant only, incl:�cfes Zoning At1as
Amendrr�ent
$o Comprehensive PCan Tex# Ar�endment
AAPLI�ATIDNTOAMENI7: � �UTURE tAiUDUSE M�IP
(se{ectone� _ COMPREHENS[VE PLAiV (7�XT}
pROP���r aw�v�� ���� n��n�:
r�n��!! �t��C ��Q��s:
Pxo�� �ua�►g��:
EMRiL:
AGEi�iZ QR REP�?ESET1TATfVE:
MAtUNG AQDRESS:
P�-(Oi�f� NIiMBER:
/ :� ^1
EMA(L: �'r� :� g "t.: .�...�� .� '�,;�,,:�.�.Ci t'N�;? � sf%i `�r__v__.c/;�t �+ _tI . _ �i� �' €�'`L_...__.....,_._ ... —.___._...,......._..��_
ADDRESS O� 5U8JECT ,
PRflPERTY (ifi applicable): f,��'� -~,�..t,,i' .� -' ii � � r'� �- �, t� i��,� � `�
""'. _.�{ .� � �. �. �--.__.�,.'� � �. :>� .t,;;� '''::".:�-' '''``' � �� 1` ^' ! r:.r .
�a�c��r�t��B�R(s�: �`'t��' _r`� �'-/` �.�ft i.5°" IC, �-d`:� �- Jf'���,%i. 1 ��Ir.� r;�� ._�: - {1�. --
�x!-'a-` _ � A._."` �4--�-'�---•-�-�--�1�1 � _.._�. � . ./_�
LEGACDESCRIPTIf.�tV: 1 iY— r�' � — %' �rr�r? ,,y 'i tii - ° •-- : �_—�� ;�`
_...__:.._._.��__._ �fC)t ��r-� �!7-__ �' 1`� Pr_ „� �.� 1�-��.� .�. �'�� �°:,�-
_/_ a =
�€SCRIATlflt�! QF TEXT t'L.`''� � f`�
AiVlENDMENi' {if app(icable}; �.y�����!_��
S�ecifica�ly ideratlfy th�
requested amet�dment to thz
Compref�ensive Plan
=' . .it�;)n!�
Planning � Develcpmant De�artmant, i00 S. �l+iyrkEe R�r2n��e, C;ear.va��r, EL 33756; TaL• i27•562-�SS7; �ax: ??T-562-4&65
Paga 1 of 5 Re�rissd 03142
� �3� Planning & D�velop�nent Departmen�
� ��;�� ����+� ��� � t ������I' ' -
_ � � ���� �� ������� �����������
" Including Future Land Use Map Amendments
PLEASE EiVSUR� THAT TNE FOLLOWiIUG INFORM}1TI0�1 1S FILIED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS
FORY+II WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEIiVG FOU�7D INCONIPLETE A�ID PflSSiSLY DEFEf2RED UiUTiL THE FOILOWit�G
AP�LiC�TlO�J CYCLE.
�U�"?J�� �4a i� IaSE P�i�l a3����1`���9t?i ! ��
PRESENT: �
REQUESTED: JG-�J _
—,--
zr��a��3� ��s-�q�c�r
PRESENT:
REqUESTED: �%��
SiTE AREA: �� �(,� sq. ft.
r��vc��u� �,uowAS�E ���s�rr/i�a-r��vs�zv(s) :
Y
Current/Existing
Future Land Use(s): {,! �,
Proposed Future
Land Use(s): . 5 (/ G�-
(units, rooms or beds per acre or no -
residential square footageJ
FUTU�t€ LA�iD US� �LA9V DES9GI�ATl�NS
North: ��iV � %�,E'J/.
South
East:
W est:
l..` —
�
c.
.
1 �! ��� �/I
_ �J� f �t/�7� c.��
F � 7 acres
us�(s}:
Existing (currentiy on site � ' /
or previous use if vacant): ����/ �.ct,��
Proposed (new use, if any; /� � ///� / ti
plus existing if to remain): �`C �/ C�L t"�t/ � c( `
��'dT ���PE4TY/: � /
� l v � ��/V
�.
STATE OF FLORfDA, C�UNTY OF Pi3�EltAS
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application.r�, �
Sworn to and subscribed before me this �`�' day of
�� �� . to me and/or by
� � �y�rho is personaily known has
pr ced ���1 � v4 %��. as identification.
Signa�t�re ¢f q`r�perty o,bGn�r or representative
Notary public,
My commission
(�
�*�� ���� ".'y C�;�rn. fx�lrs3 Jsa 17, 2�15
�$�'� � . �Comm�si�on�4' fE f �tr�� p
Pt:;nni�S" ��evelo ment e a men , S. ,, `rtls Avenue, Clearwater, FL 3375&, Tei: 727-562-4557; Fax: 727-552-4865
�y�"` b'r �`"�>;�:.,�'"y-w=�,. � .., :''--�''�,-. Revised 03I12
�� � r: ���r- �" ��a�ni�g Si �3��vel�p���t i�e�artrn��t
'_ ��� �� T�� ���
` ������������� ���� .������ ��� ���Ii��t���
���������� ������� ��������t
lIV A�i�IT1C3� Tt3 TP-#L C(}�IlPL1E7E�3 �t��311PRE�#ERl�i4lE �l..d�i'� Ai�`IEi1��,�EPiT ^�.,Pi�Li��7?C�l, ��L
C�i�JlP�t�t���+d�l�fE PLAtV Ai�JtE�t�PtiE�li AAd��ICATi�i�S ��lALL I�t�LL�I£3� A�L3B�i1Ti�iL �d�C�{�GE T��1T
��`aCCiT�FST��� ��LLC91.r1�3a�C,;
If �-��� ���rlica�ivrt is for t�rr atnen�lrrrertt to �h� �'ot�rp�eh�r-�siue �fan Fa�%ur� t�and Us� ,r1��'�r�a �f,t3�), in
w�t�:::..'�..� �v^ ��° �'1p2�yi'.':d°:�'ii3..�j» i-{$�+o�u'�" i w i�mv r rr1 »r ;.-d e$a d..t! •
y i p,�s.� �,''i ...l,s� s.aiS'J }ri ii�`iui trsc^lvaav's�' iaf���
Praof of ownershlp {e.g., copy of deed, titl� ins�aran.c� �o(ic;�, or �th�r instrument dernonstrating
o�r�;,e�s�iP) iNoie: Submrt two capr�s or�1}r at ttrra cf �rigr�aC e��aplic��ic�r�;
Lega! c�escriptic�n of ihe property, If the nr�perty €s r;�t ��fatte� lot afi r�cord, a current bc�un�ary
s�ar��rw�l �r�pared, signed and sealscf by � lan:� sur,�e��ar c�arr�nt�y register�ct in the S�a�e af r3�r��� is
required.
InfQrrnation d�rnc�ns�ratin� that th� prapds�d amendmenfi cotnplies with ti�� criteria set �orth in
5�ctic�n =?-G(}3.F. Th� a�achnd Comprehensive Plan �mendment Standards for Reviet�� sheet shali b�
used to provide these responses.
�r� a�sessment af the isnp�ct �f th� pra�os4c� c�tange cn �he a�equacy of public facilities, the
en�,-�rc�nr^ent, communi�y charact�r, and the �isca! con�i�ion o€ the c�ty.
If �h� ap�!`iccrticsrr i.s f�r art rz��ttra'x��nt f� �'he Crrrt��sr�h�rts�€�� �It�tt te�' (C�',��, and do�3 nm� cr�'f�cf� a�
inditi�s�f��r1 pa,�ef of lc�,�d, in rrddii�iar� �� i�e �ppd��crtican, �#re �np�fi��rate�trstaisc� n�°c�v�d� ��r��nld�a�i��•
C�ata �nd analysis tn support such an amendment under Florida Statutes.
ln�orrnation de€�sonstrating tha� the prapase�l arnen�rnenfi c��plies with the criteria s�t farth in
Section 4-6(�3.F, Th� ai-�a�.hed Comprehensive P1an �imendmen� Standar�fs for Review sheet shall be
�sed ta pra�ride thes� r¢sponses.
r� 7raffic Ir�paci Stu�y is n�t requirec! as part o� th� applicatian for an ar�endmeni to the Co;�prehensi�e
Plan Future land Use Map {Ll1€��. A Tra€fic Impact Stuciy rna� be prQViei�d at �h? �r�f�can�'s �'iseretion to
suppfement ths assessmer-�t �f fihe ir,��ac� or ti-�e �r��,osed ch�,ng� on th� ad�qu�c3� c�� �uc�lic `¢cilities
(existing roadwaysl. A Traific impacfi Study may be required at the time a site ;�I�� is suf�rr,i�f�d for
development revietiv ii the total gen�rated ne� new trips generatecf by the praj�osed developrr�enz rneet
�r�� �r �ior¢ c;�nt�itir�r� oaT�in�� on the ap{�rapriafe applic��ia�,
P�;yB� (� i�E��?��lG A�ii'Ei��:��;C�: The ��plicanfi or a;��lican-trs a�en� is acS�rised t� a�e�d al� ��biic
h�arings scheduled far the proposed ame�dr�ent including publ�c hearings beior� ti�e Cornmunity
Develapment Soard and City Coun�il.
Planr>inc� ?: a�evel�pm=nfi D��a�2m��nt, SCO S. �iy�i� 4r�nt��, Ci:�a�:�azer, FL 331:�6, T�l: 72i-562-�5C7; �=ax: ?27-5S2-42S�
:'��e 3 015 'r't�vi�ae� 03li2
4� a 4
� P�a�nin� & �evelc�p�e�� D�pa�en�
� ���� � ���.� �����°�����i�� ���� ��e�������
�������� €�� ��� �������
P�O�III�E CL3CY'iPLET� �2ES€�flNSES Ti� EA�1� �i� T�E 5(� (6} 5�"A�iT7A�i�� F��2 R�ViEL�I ���Cd�3i1tlNG HO�'tij ��v
aET�iL, THE C�itiE�2iC.�'�I ES B��tUC� C£�(tttPL1E� �'l�4-i ��€t i'�i4S CQ;11�l�i-i��#�l�d� P��i A�9��B�1,���1T.
1. The amendment �nrii! further irn�I�rrtQt��atic�n of the cornprehensive plan consis�ant v,rith the goals,
palicies and objecti�es contained irt the p{an. i �: „,=- ;'=' ; - �% .. -° .; '' �, :�<�t : �:a _..,`
` } J' % f
` ., �`` `r :-� � �`r ./.'' �� �f , `a� �" � •'fr .t �i�^ �`�� .� J,� �,:r: f t ,J,,�'
r"f,.- r 3 _. � f .;� `i , : B
.
: r � -
„ .
, � � � , i f" rr l.� � r�� �r � F 1 P' f . .-' � � ,x" ` . . �'i r ` P ;.f„ G�. r'� ,� � r, � {, f.
�/ �- d ,� r f; r` �! f f� a 3' J, r� �;_ ,� �� j
� 1 i ..� __ _---r -------f� �,-°-------- r . f,r �.�� �: � .._.�� .�....._ _
r . ,! -- f,
�P /J 1 I` �'i ; f � _ :� ' 'F' :>!^ °�f,r. .:v� �.r`��'.';�% �.E./ �r'.�J/i(! y',' �i /:t T;.
' ' " ' ;�- '' »r. './ # %i , i � `"r
J r-- /� { r..?�� ' 'j �. ,�. .,._.!. _ '.{ ;1 r� . _.f- .� qr/' i, � . �,�``� . ���� . ' i /�.r�-- .�f�'`.%%° .. ,,�`� -"✓ .
. ,, j � _ s ';, ` r,.
2. The amendment is nv� incansistent v,�ith other prr�visions of the comprehensi�e pian.
/ ,> f�� jj . � f�
�'S �.+r.r..-!.f j. j. ;i,� 1 .-''� y'..-.--' :" ,�.� .. :ti9_.,-` ,� "�! � ir� '`"'� IM( r���Jl P8 r' � ?" ����, "..�,,� Frr��y� ' 1* , /.!s
+. ��_ ;� r ._-�/ � t 9. ..Y �. � t y:.
,. , . . , .' , � .
, . ,r ' � .. . �' . . � � �,+,..
F '` ,i� , � "''
f
� ,.f jrr��/7 � s t_ r _.1': � /1%� i '`- ' ; � a �, �hW � s'"J��-'"/ /��:.'•f"�` !, 1='�.rj
�____ r� f ___
� � f �
t }� '�'� �i/ ke f�' �
' ,�, , f :�r �...:�..L....,,.., ^ f . .� ':;� . � _
A. .�....�._�.._..........V_....
3. The availabfe uses, if applicable, to which the r�reperty rt�ay be put �,:e �p�aropriate to the property in
questian and c�rra}�atible �vith existing and. plann�d us�s in the are�.
; .> , ,. �� � �,� ,,/
- > . _t.;a , r �ry _ ._..
�
v ,`�.J-r . , ,</,,:. f i , ., ._ ..-.. J;..: ..! (,� . �- . ;. �.� � r'0;.�./ T J /�� � !�j. ff ,`- ±, � ,`' . �
, . —
� i O
' � -
f z' ` �° -� ` f' — _
, r, /' `" ,. 7 f
t .{� �; � � i.. 1 r: �7� ..r y .,� ..;: j: . _ ...
�� r t r{ _-� • �'.�( :,fr f I f�r��.`�' �'� 'j r I�?; R J r '� ° li.�`
�. _ _. . �5 - S' ,� r
4. Suffiicient ptablic facitities ars avaiiaiale to serve the praperty.
/? ., �/'
>
�j;.,,-�a ,.�F d/,�: !� � ; -r� �l.di .;�'f � . %,✓j - . . ��4 ��"'-- � , s.�.._tf._ .i,•�7..d . .�.�i,;�^`fr:�;,,:
_� ..
�y.,.,..�.�_ �. � � � . . Y .
� ,, � �� � .. .. . �
�` J
P i i 4%' � /! - � � `� � �'" i ✓; ,i f � i
--� i - - --- �
%
5. The amandmant wi11 nat adversely affect the natur�l envirt�nment.
f,...- ; - �
- :� , �, .� .'s '' r '`:%' , , . _
,. _ � __ �_ � �_._ _
� i� i � J
-� ; . , �: � ,, .
, : . : - , . ,- ' . , �.,,, ,, _; _... , �, �.
,, �_ �
,.,, ; , -.
—'-._..�_.....�..�...::.__ _�...W.__._�___., .._ �_.._..__ - . . . � r . � ;.. ;
6. 1 he amendrr�ent will nat adv�, sely impacfi th� use of proper�}r in the immediate area.
, -
r� 3 � a . r 1 .� _
.. -" .. . . . -: . : _ � ,...�,_ .,. ,, f ...
. ,..y �..--. , � . . : �. , , . , . �� -r�
. ,, ;. �
. . � , . ,� F .� "-
.� . _ . � - t � __ � �...- _,.q j'A ,�.
.�._._�__._...__.. _:_.____..... _.._...__ ......._,..�____.._.._. .._.__�.�_ . .._...__ '
. ,7 � �.�..._w.__"_._` _.,,.�..� ___... .
a �� .� �r � � �
�
. �- .,� "i � '� .
+ ;
:. . � F . t .: : . � � z ,._ r .. ._... � j , .: -
._ . .. .:�� . . r.. .. . , _ . .
__i�..._t.:.. __ ...__..._,- .....,...�__.._. . .--_.__-.......... ._�..,n........._.
': r:,
Plannin� 8 Dwv�to;.,rrs2nt �e�a�:mani, 1Q0 S. l�;�r`s?v K�vc:r,�.��, Ciaar•,��acvr, ��. -33T�fl, 'iet: 72�-aS2-A.5�7; Fax: 7�'�-�62-�p65
Page �3 of 5 °.�uia�d 03it2
�� �'
� � ' � � d � � n��� �;; ����iYig � I}e�re�t��s��en�. i�� ��,t��3�ta�
�' � �P��� �
�...°tE�•��� �� ��'�i��tz'������x��'��� ��c�z�.�-a.��.�������a��.��
` 'ti.�..a'"�_
4 iii�� ��.�8� �' r''4 xx `�`i. ,�3� %s.a � jc. {
---° __�._�. _ fi �.�1 d':a_8LC li ,d"x� .CG.�'�'�� �a, f �� ������� G.S� �i�'3��
1. Pravic�e narnes o� all pro�e, c�w�ers an t�eec;–PRINTru�I names:
rr
-�--C�?,1,�7' i;`'zz- i�c%�.-R� y ` ..� �� _
—��
�. That (! �mjti�e are) the owrser�s) ar�d record tiile h�ider(s} afthe follotivi�g described propert�;
�cT..� �d•�. � � ,/ t/ /
� �
, .
._..�___ , - ... , ,/ � , ,!�
.� ' �
�._.._._�� ,._.._.�.. s t�z . �� � -
�c: `'� ....�...� !��'Z .-,'� r! �- f;f.. � } l �_t� �l�' I /�...I .� ....1 "`T� � % p. ��'�' � �i , t��,� 7-
...�.�_...._--` ...s z'- -- L-- - - 1 �.r..
�. T��t tl�is prc�p�rtv c�rsfi�u�es ? h� �r�pe�s,� for
-- C.'t�,°ri ?v��. tJ��rt S f (/'�. ���'tn ��, �r
�.._.�.,,.._..._.",__.._..___._.�-_.�-� _.� .L��-�
�.
S.
C=�
a r�r�uest far {descri�e reques�):
��,
Thatthe;undersign�d �h�sl�a.re) appointe� artci t�oesjdo) apPaint: _---_�___._.�
—�2'1,�.� ��� ��'� � , ,
as ;3.�/their} agent{s:) to execute any petitions or �th�r dacc�ment� ��cess�r}� ta affect such
peti ��an,
7hat this affidavii has #�een execut�cf to induce the Ci�y of Clear�yater, Florida ts� consider anr� act an ihe
al�ol�e de=crib�d prtipe�ty;
That site visits to t}te property sre n2cessa�y by City ��prsser�atives in vrder to pracess this appEication
�r,d ��e ���n�r �a,rch�riz�s"�1� �'{ `r� ps�;ntatives to visit and photograph the r� r
� c�,.- 1.' p A�rtY des,.ribec in t�iis
G�}.� � .'Liiii'I� .% ...�`°' .� lA .
7. T!-�at'(E/�t: cj,
� :-�'
voner
C3�v:�er
,.��q"�� ..:.....�.�.,� .w.�.,..�.,.k:�..,ti�..
. h�re���r�ify that the fore�oing is true and �orrect.
STAT� QF �I.4lR�[3A, EOUtilTY �F PI:�EtU�S
Pro�rty �3v: «er
Pra;�rty � :r; ser
S�FORE M� THk U€�CEPSlG4�ED, A�? 4FFlC�R pC �LY C{3PJiP✓ISS1ClidE{7 �Y TH� LA��JS Oi-THE STAi£ 0� FLbt�1DA, C:4
,�s r r�- ^�,
TH!S 1...'_ `� �__� €J�;YtiF �r 5�`.:..� �"���.�
�-.�.� � � ,� �
r , P�€�SO?�/�i:LY APPEAF�EL
n�=. � � Y�°� _._�`�w.� r��
� -- Vvrs-i�I I-�AVstJ� BEEI� FiRST C1UlY�lt!�G�P.{�
DEr�QSE� Atvt� S'�YS THAT H�fSHE �r41LLY UM1'DE�t57�1�D5 it3E CONTENTS �� i"!-I� AfFIGAsJiT7HriT F[�/SHE Sli:�;£I3_
��, � �si#��� �. �''��
r�"' -�"� r��'�� �i1�Ll� }• ,�,�
� � � S�r�� � ��.C2�i�,� M�., �`�;����'.� �t���""'�
� C�+s�f��' ��2�� ' ._..�__ �- �_ _— .__w.��._.._._...,_._._ _---
• ._� �1��ary Pu'�Iic Si�ature
� '��'6�'�° ��;�..t.� i�: r_,;t'{'iTi`� �,
t�ai3rwSealfStam�-, h4y�flmmissi�n Ex�ires: � f,�.°'� ""` ,� -„�
----- ^� n..f –�.�? -�--�.��
Pianning � DevelaprnenF t�w_pasiment, 400 S. f}i; r�11e #i���n:te, Cleanua°.er, FL 337'v5, Tel: 727-562 ti6S�, Fa�: 737_5&2-4&65
Pa ge S of 6
Rsvised 03?12
I#: 2047069236 BK: 15658 PG- 1606, 02/28f2007 a� 12:23 �, ^FCORT3ING 1 PAGES
$14.Ofl D DflC STAMP C�Li,ECTI. $980. d0 KEN BL7RECE, CLERK t3� )URT PINELLAS
COUNTY, FL BY DEi�UTY CLERK: CLKfiDi5
Pr�cred By:
Johv G Ge�ait
6it IDruid Aoed, Suite 5�fl
Cltanrater, i�7osi�e 33i56
PkitCEL NO. - 02129/1'S!i 6452�fiF17/0010
. �' � �': �: :' . �..
.�
i �
� �
� �
� �
- � 5 t
�l \� ♦i
� �� � )
� ,�/i _��* �., ♦
r � +
��►7t3 �iP6��f3f�tYC, m�de this �� day of February 20Q7, ; � �eh3+�� � � •
SUSAi! L. Gk.F�.931Y�F2, t�tescy�rriesf, �' ,�. � �,
- _�� .
whosc posi afYice address is 11713 Smi�t Boulevard, Hudson, f7prHia 34667, ofthe COunty of Paxo. �State oF�lorida, �yraatm y�*3d
CE�"'I'R.t�L REf4I.'Y'Y, LTMIC., � Ffargda corpQrseaon, �� ', �,',
� � , ,
wttiose post office address is 6580 7lr�i Avenue N., Pmeltas Park, Elarida 3318l, ofthe Counry of Pir�Fias,�iat�eflf�{{anda, "grentee";
�itt�CS$E��i9 thatsasd grazstor, fator� � considcrationofthc sum ofTcn Ibl(ars {S�3a�00) and ot}cergood and valz�abte oansiderations
to said grantor in hend paid by said grar.tce, du rtceipt whe�of is hcreLy ackswwfedg'e�1 �az Santed, j�rga�ned atsd safd to the said
g�ariaa. ar�d its s�cessors and assibms fa.ever. k}sc foilowing despibcd land, s;td�iq 1Ying and 8e�ng in.�ir�EllasCou�ity, State ofFic}rida
to wa: • � -
� ��
.. .
Le>t 2, Biock A, CZEr4RWATER RIGHi.A?Sii�S t�h`LT A, aecea�,3j6g «S[ie �sp ur pie# t�ereof $s
a+ecarde� �� Piat Boa7c 28, at page 95, af t�e ptcbCt r2sflircis oE �tin�llas Con�ty, Fforida.
-_ �
Subjc� io easement oCrecord and ta:ces far th�.year Z00T and't�ierea4�er.
i � � /
4 � ,� ` '
a�d said grantwdneshcmby fultywsrrantlhetislet9sa"rd i'�and u�71 defgny'1 thesameagai�tlav.�'ul e}aims ofa11 persons whomsoevea.
. ,
��`, .
�if �i$TtCSS �CiCO�, grantor hs; herydnm �hL�hacxi�.;ca4 on tht day and year firs! above written.
sesle3 and del iverc+d in our pre:unce:
_4 �---��� , .
��
�\.
,'
s� � �,. csra��� '
i / ,� � /
\./ + i i
+� .
STt�T� �3F`�L`t7�E�',,,
�€�i�A1TY (3�' �'IP+rEg.L,�$
� "_`,- -_' , �+
' T�ep,�vr¢g�iag' Istshvm�aet was acknowledged before me this �.s� day of Febnxa,y, 2Q07, hy S�3SAhT i<. C.4.RAn£R, wiw
���s per3Qnatly krwim to me w[ j haz produr,ed �t! J�_ as idemificaiion.
.\'�t �
�. r
.1 :
� P = lic
jAFFIX DFFICTAI. SEAC)
q�����E�Q4�EB6fftE�'8�
��`�9�,��y� �i. �j���e/,eoo
aaoeoai 6
mm°��i��e��4���f0hl ia° �Q �<
F
4 � ��IQ.= $ 29 �'Q�id� � '
m�,°� � �V� �� N•
` �e� •�
� a°
a a� �DA�45�t}4
. .
�' ' .�'
�7a',�y °�ni�B�`.a�.+�t:=°�e
Scrial Numbet, iFany:
Iviy Commission Expires: