FLS2013-08027,
801 BAY ESPLp►Np►DE
FLS2013-08027
�.
Wiiliam Biackwood Re ANas #: 249A
" Zoning: Low Medium Density
o l � , . Planning & Development Department
� i�1LA.I VYA,I�CT Flexible Standard Develo ment A lication
P Pp
� Detached Dwellings, Duplexes orAssociated Accessory Use/Structures
IT 15 IN[UMBENT UPON THE APPUCANT TO SUBMR COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTNE,
IPICOMPLEtE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVAUDATE YOUR APPLICATION.
ALL APPUCATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY QND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DEWERIESj
TO THE PLANNING & OEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE.
A TQTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN
ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. PtANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED
TO BE COUATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS.
THE APPUCANT, BY FILIPIG THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPUCABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
FIRE DEPT PREIIMARY SRE PLAN REVIEW FEE: ��
APPLICATIOIY FEE: �2�, (if for detached dweliings or duplexesJ OR
100 (if for accessory uses/strudures for detached dwellings/duplexes)
PROPER7Y OWNER (PER DEED): Will'�am Biackwood
MAlLIN6 ADDRESS: 627 Bay Esplanade
PHONE NUMBER: 727-251-7236
EMAIL• wblackwo�tampabay.rr.com
AGENT OR REPRESENTATNE: Terri Skapik, Woods Consutting
MAILIN6 ADDRESS: 1714 Couniy Road 1, Suite 22 Dunedin, FL 34698
PHONE NUMBER: 727-786-5747
EMAIL: terriskapik�woodsconsul�ng.org
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 801 Bay Esplanade
PARCEL NUMBER(5): 05-29-15-54666-033-0010
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: MANDALAY SUB BLK 33, LOT 1
PROPOSED USE(S): p�vate dodc for singie family residential property
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Construct single famify dock (996 sq ft) with 2 wet slips and 1 covered boat lift.
Specifcally identijy the requesr Variances for side setbacks, variances for marimum length and width allowed per code.
(include aIl requested code flexibility;
e.g., reduction in required num6er of
parking spaces, heigR� setbacks, lot
size, !ot width, specifrc use, eic.):
Planning 8 Development Departmertt,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwate�, FL 33756, Te1: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562�865
Page 9 of 7 Revised 01/12
° Clearwater
U
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Standard Development Application
Data Sheet
PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM
WILL RESUIT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLEfE AND POSSIBIY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING
APPIICATION CYCLE.
ZOAIiNG DISTRICT:
FUTLIRE LANO USE PLAN DfSiGNATION:
LMDR
RU
IXISTING USE (currently existing on site): singie family residen6ai
PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, ff to remain): no change
SITE AREA:
sq. ft. �•174 acres
GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of ail buildings):
Existing: WA sq. ft.
Proposed: wA sq. ft.
Maximum Allowable: �`1�A sq. ft.
GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses):
First use: �A sq. ft.
Second use: wA sq. ft.
Third use: wA sq. ft.
FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: N/A
Proposed: N�A
Maximum Aliowable: WA
BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1�` floor square footage of all buildings):
Existing: wA sq. ft. ( wA 96 of site)
Proposed: PUA sq. ft. ( WA % of site)
Maximum Permitted: WA sq, ft. ( WA % of site)
GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter bufFerj:
Existing: N/A sq. ft. ( N/A % of site)
Proposed: wA sq. ft. ( �`1�A � of site)
VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area):
Existing: N/A sq. ft. ( WA
Proposed: wA sq. ft. ( WA
9� of site)
% of site)
Planning & Development Departrnent,100 S. MyrUe Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fa�c: 727-562-4865
Page 2 of 7 Rev'ised 01112
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (totai square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: N/A
Proposed: N!A
Maximum Permitted: N/A
DENS(TY (units, rooms or beds per acre):
Existi ng: IV/A
Proposed: N/A
Maximum Permitted: WA
OFF-STREET PARIqNG:
Existing: N/A
Proposed: N/A
Minimum Required: WA
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Existing: N/A
Proposed: N/A
Maximum Permitted: WA
Note: A parking demand study must be provided In conjunction with ony request
io reduce the amount of required off-street porking spoces. Please see rhe
adop[ed Parking Demand Siudy Guidelines for further information.
WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $ 40,000
ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADIACENT PROPERTY:
North: L1'V► D �{
so�tn: L v►� .� �
East: L M � !2
west: L �'�► 1� 1'�
STATE OF FLDRIDA, COUNTY OF PINEUAS �7� �,�^
I, the u�dersigned, acknowiedge that all Swom to and subscribed before me this J"f �l day of
representations made in this appiication are irue and � L, ,��� , to me and/or by
accurate to the best of my knowiedge and authorize =7��—
City representatives to visit and photograph the L%�G�tl�l/ ���-�� who is personally known has
property described in this application. roduced
_ P _ as identification.
'� �_..�',�_��
��
Signature of property owner or
Notary p blic, . * ' ' * MYC4MI+�SSION�EE092145
M com i ex ires: ,., t EXPIRES: Juty 18, 2015
YP _A e_.�,�.a.._..,�_,._.�_:,....
Planntng & Devebpment Departrnent,l� S. MyrUe Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: T27�562-4865
Page 3 of 7 Revised 01J72
o Planning & Development Department
� C ear�vater Flexible Standard Develo ment A lication
p pp
� Site Plan Submittal Package Check list
IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT (FLS) APPLICATION, ALL FLS APPUCAT10N5 FOR A
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING, DUPLEX, OR ACCESSORY USE/STRUCTURE ASSOCIATED WITH EITHER A SiNGLE-FAMILY
DE'fACHED DWELLING OR DUPIEX SHALL INCLUDE A PlOT PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
I� Responses to the Generai Applicability criteria as sei forth in Section 3-914.A. T'he attached Fiexible Standard Development
Application General Appiicability Criteria sheet shali be used to provide these responses.
e� Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use�s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the
subject property is located. The attached Flexible Standard Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to
provide these responses.
❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the properry,
dimensions, acreage, location of all current structuresrmprovements, location of all public and private easements including
official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site.
h f�- 0 If the application would resutt in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as
� v provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5.
� If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar
marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional
engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shatl not be required for the repair
or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on
private and commercial docks.
�(� ❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH (diameter at breast height), and species on the parcel proposed for development
f�
with a DBH of four inthes or more and identifying those trees proposed to be removed.
€� A site plan with the following information:
❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared.
❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the propert}r is focated within a Special Flood Hazard
Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable.
❑ location, setbacks and use of all existing and proposed building and structures.
❑ Location of all existing and proposed parking areas, sidewalks and driveways.
❑ Location, type of material and height of all existing and proposed fences.
❑ location of all existing and proposed utilities, including water, sewer, gas, and stormwater.
0 Location of all existing utility easements, including Official Records book and page numbers, and any proposed utility
easements.
O Building or structure elevation drawings that depid the proposed building height, building materials, and concealment of
all mechanical equipment located on the roof.
Planning 8 Development Departrnent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tet: 727-562�i567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 4 of 7 Revised 01/12
LL
° �learwater
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Standard Development Application
� General Applicability Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA IXPLAININ6 HOW, IN DETAII, THE
CRlTERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent
properties in which it is located.
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES.
2. The proposed development wili not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings
or significantly impair the value thereof.
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES.
3. The proposed development wil� not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of the proposed use.
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
SEE A7TACHED EXHIBIT 1 FOR WRITfEN RESPONSES.
5. The proposed developme�t is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 FOR WRITfEN RESPONSES.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of
operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES.
Planning 8 Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwate�, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727�62-4865
Page 5 of 7 Revised 01/12
o f' Planning & Development Department
� l�` e��a�er Flexible Sta.ndard Develo ment A lication
P pp
� Flexibility Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLEiE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE�Sj BEING REQUESTED AS SET
FORTH IN THE ZONIN6 DISTRICT(5) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOGITED. D(PLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EAtH CRITERION
IS BEING COMPIJED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAI (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECFSSARY).
1. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES.
2_ SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES.
3. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WRITi'EN RESPONSES.
4. SEE ATTACNED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WRITfEN RESPONSES.
5. SEE AT("ACHED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES.
6. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES.
,. SEE ATTACHED EXHIB(T 2 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES.
$. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES.
Pianning 8 Devebpment Depa�tment, 100 S. MyrUe Avenue, Ciearwater, FL 33756, Tei: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727�62-4865
Page 6 of 7 Rev'�sed 01112
° �learwater
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Standard Development Application
° Aff'idavit to Authorize Agent/Representaiive
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names:
William Blackwood
2. That (I am/we arej the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the foilowing described properly:
801 Bay Esplanade, Parcei Identfication Number. 05-29-15-54666-033-0010
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe requestj:
Single Family Dock
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
Terri Skapik, Woods Consulting
as (his/their) agent{sj to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petifion;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above descr;bed
property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner
authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this appliption;
7. That (1/we), the undersigned auth ' eby certify that the foregoing is true and corred.
���,�.1'� �.��
Property Owner � Property Owner
Property Owner
BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED,
THIS
DAY OF
Properly Owner
STATB OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF F�ORIDA, ON
� � , PERSONALLY APPEARED
WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN
DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED.
�t�Y Pu�C VlK➢\ Wf7/'1IY
x� * MY COMMISSION 0 EE 092145
EXPIRES: July 18, 2015 N ary Public Signature
Notary SeallStamp ���'��n°"��T ��'"'B"�NO�'� My �mmission Expires:
Plannirtg & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtte Avenue, Clearwaber, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 7 of 7 Revised M112
EXHIBIT 1:
Written Submittal Requirements
Flexible Development Application
Genera) Applicability Criteria
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmonv with the scale bulk covera�e
dens�tv and character of adiacent properties in which it is located
The proposed single family private dock will be in character of the adjacent properties. The
existing properties are all residential properties and most, if not all, have private single family
docks. Therefore the proposed single family private dock is consistent with the docks at the
adjacent properties.
The proposed single family private dock will be in harmony with the scale, bulk and coverage of
the private single family docks in the immediate area even with an increased length as
requested. As proposed, the single family private dock is 79 ft in length which is similar in size
to the docks in the immediate area. The dock is moved out and away from the seawall to avoid
having slips located over top of submerged aquatic resources, particularly the sea grass beds.
The Pinellas County Environmental Management Department performed a site visit, at our
request, to map the extent of the seagrass beds and they are shown on the attached plan view
drawings. Based on their field inspection, they determined the dock should be located where
shown to avoid impacting the grass beds through propeller or shading effects.
As regards the existing private docks in the immediate area, please see the attached Woods
Consulting AERIAL Exhibit 1. This exhibit was created to show the proposed dock in relation to
the existing docks in the immediate area. Immediately to the north of the project site are four
private docks that are all 60 to 75 ft in length. All of these docks appear to have been
permitted so that the terminal platforms are located outside (waterward) of the grass beds.
The property immediately to the south is Mango St (public right of way) and there is no dock.
The properties farther to the south all have private docks but they are shorter. The aerial
shows the grass line diminishes toward the south.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discoura�e the appropriate development and use
of adiacent land and buildin� or si�nificantiv impair the value thereof
The proposed single family private dock will not hinder or discourage appropriate use and
development of adjacent land or impair the value thereof. In fact, a dock can significantly
improve the value of surrounding properties.
The proposed si:�gle family private dock will not hinder or discourage development at adjacent
properties as the proposed dock abuts a public right of way to the south where docl<s (with
mooring) will likely never be built. The dock was positioned closer to the south abutting
property line to provide as much side setback to the north as possible without reducing the size
of the slip spaces. Because the docks/slips will be parallel to the main dock, more width is
1
needed. Although variances for length and width are being requested, the proposed length is
consistent with several larger existing private docks in Clearwater Harbor. The width variance is
needed to allow boats to moor parallel to the seagrass beds and not back in to slips to prevent
prop scarring. The proposed docl< will not impede use of the waterway in this area.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safetv of persons residin� or
workin� in the ne��hborhood of the proposed use
The proposed single family private dock will be for the use by the upland resident and will not
adversely affect health or safety of the residents or persons working in the neighborhood. The
dock will be built to conform with County Dock Codes.
4. The proposed development is desi�ned to avoid traffic con�estion.
The proposed single family private dock will be for the use of the upland resident and therefore
no additional traffic will be created with the proposed dock.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the communitv character of the immediate
vicinitv of the parcel proposed for development
The proposed dock is consistent with the zoning, future land use for a private singfe family
residence. The proposed docic is consistent with the size and scale of larger docks that are
located in the immediate area.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects includin� visual acoustic
and olfactorv and hours of operation impacts on the adiacent properties
There will be no negative adverse effects visually as the dock will be constructed with wood
fixed in place by wooden pilings. The construction materials and installation requirements will
adhere to the Pinellas County dock construction code. There will be no walls or enclosures on
the dock; only the covered roof and one boat lift.
There will be no negative adverse effects acoustically as this will operate only as a single family
private dock for the upland resident. There are no high/dry slips, no load out, no wash racks,
no fueling facilities, etc.
2
EXHIBIT 2
Written Submittal Requirements
Responses to the Flexibility Criteria for the specific use being requested as set forth in
the Zoning Districts in which the subject property is proposed
Dock Criteria Section 3-601C1.g (i) and (ii)
g. Deviations.
(i) The applicant is aware the community development coordinator may grant
deviations from the requirements of this section as a Level One (minimum standard)
approval provided that signed and notarized statements of no objection are submitted
from adjacent waterfront property owners, as well as signed and notarized statements
on the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority permit application.
In the case of 801 Bay Esplanade, the City of Clearwater is the owner of the south
adjacent property (Mango Street Public Right of Way) and it's our understanding such
notarized letters of no objection can only be reviewed through this review process. The
other adjacent neighbor to the north is not willing to sign a notarized letter of no
objection for the proposed dock. Therefore, in the event that such statements cannot
be obtained, we understand the application for deviations may be approved by the
community development coordinator, provided that the proposed dock will result in no
navigational conflicts. We further understand, such deviations may be approved
through a level One (flexible standard) approval process based on one of the following:
(a) The proposed dock location needs to be adjusted to protect
environmentally sensitive areas; or
(b) The property configuration or shallow water depth precludes the
placement of a dock in compliance with the required dimensional standards; however,
the proposed dock will be similar in dimensional characteristics as surrounding dock
patterns.
The proposed dock location needs to be adjusted in length and width to protect the
environmental sensitive areas where seagrass beds are present. Attached is an aerial
that clearly the shows the seagrass beds in the near-shore areas. The seagrass beds are
widest to the north of the property and appear to thin toward the south. We requested
the Pinellas County's Environmental Management Dept. to perform a site visit to
identify, delineate and verify the presence of protected resources; specifically seagrass
beds. They visited and concurred that the seagrass line shown on the attached plans is
accurate (Sheet 2 of the Woods Consulting dock plan drawings). The seagrass line is
approximately 53 ft water-ward of the seawall. Therefore, the dock, as designed, will
have minimal to no adverse impacts to the marine environment. The proposed dock
has both slips positioned parallel and water-ward of 53 ft to prevent boats traveling or
mooring over seagrass beds. By moving the dock out it also provides greater depths for
boat mooring to prevent potentia) prop scarring of seagrass beds.
Positioning the slips parallel to the seagrass beds required a wider dock and exceeds the
maximum width and reduces the required setbacks. Our opinion was that it was less
impact to widen the dock than to further lengthen it if the slips were to be
perpendicular to the grass beds. Excessive length we agree would be out of character
with the docks in the immediate area.
ii) No dock shall be allowed to deviate from the length requirements specified in 3-
601.C.1.b by more than an additional 50 percent of the allowable length or project into
the navigable portion of the waterway by more than 25 percent of such waterway,
whichever length is less. In no case shall the length of the dock exceed 250 feet, except
as stipulated in Section 3-601.C.1.g.iii and iv below.
It is not possible to construct a dock even with the allowed deviation of 50% of the
maximum length requirements. The property at the waterfront is 67.5 ft and even with
this 50% additional length; the max deviation would be a total of 50 ft measured from
the seawall. The seagrass beds extend to approximately 53 ft. We are very certain the
dock will not impede navigation due to the width of the waterway in this location which
is approximately 900 ft. The dock as proposed with the length variance will extend only
9% of the width of the waterway which is less than 25% the width of the waterway — a
criterion generally accepted for the maximum length docks can extend into a waterway.
We believe the proposed length variance is consistent with the private single family
docks in the immediate area. Please see the attached Woods Consulting AERIAL Exhibit
1. This exhibit was created to show the proposed dock in relation to the existing docl<s
in the immediate area. Immediately to the north of the project site are four private
docks that are all 60 to 75 ft in length. All of these docks have terminal platforms are
located water-ward of the seagrass beds. The property immediately to the south is
Mango St (public right of way) and there is no dock. The properties farther to the south
all have private docks but they are shorter. The aerial shows the seagrass line thins
toward the south.
�AY E S P LANAD E AE R IAL 1
t. T '. . � . " . � -: .
� � ��° p,�
h � R... ' .�'
4 e.}��'g�" � '>`. * . i � F" `� :.`. d. r 4 w:f'. ` ;,� nS �!? �1,�"�'�+ r �' ' � V '.'k �y�=�'�9'�F°��' � 'a"''"�2S "�.. � ' �. ! y . �i. �' r;.
1� . _�d
.' ¢�' ��`•� ''''�° '� $: ( r �.� � 2�„`+1 t��,�" 3„�..��h : sr� �:��aY' y��',� ��, �:p� Y;�.
5�4,: ��1i .Y ��� (� .. �W �� �d'."b ��. � e _ x � e$� � i .
4 . . , t � i ' � jnf 'U .� �.
('O �° ... �E..`R f> �� ' a
, ... ^o t � Y,.,. . < ' �i�' i°= _. {�. .,.' � � r��i�. � .�.� . �� ai. �±��. �. }�.. u�.� '��, F �.a<�:� ��a 'Y ,#. �;"
�'� al 'c � � �r. r��� � "�j w ' �k, i �� ;�� a �k. .24 �' �:�. i I.
°.
�� � ,
.
. 4 ._
' ,�i; -�, o ��'�' r'''`�c,..� �i,.i, _ s� „� I Q�+ �; � +,� ".�t� �Z �' •!h '�i;�g - ,, . � �• �'�;^ i�r,
, . �,�,-y,��.,, � x p+ ^ y
�, �,.� �_. W � e�.°� .. �.,�c,Z'��a. ..w , �._
� �
, . , , .� � a �,. ,����. • o'� 1� �� x�.. �.i` � .. y � I �N
, � e
.. ... ,s,. - r . '1►,_� , . � �C � +v y 1 ' �� ,=a 1 - � � � '�j, `
j ^^`- ��`"t..��� a �t . f. � � • � - � ,:i� - . " ". ..�:� •,�r ��� -. � � .<r '} t� , �`?. i - d��;��'- �,�,��v�
_ ,, . i
. ,. , -� ,
�� �
.� �� '+ ?� . � � . � v� . o ; . �� ;; .. ,. � : . Z � , m 7: �>�� � � ,� .� e
a
; �,. ;.,. .� . .�
..a � } �
.
._ . �-. .
- - , � . � ._� ���� y� ; , a
f'� � �� -.,. �,R •,'��� a ,� � � _ _ �.� � � ° �" ', "'.�'� ,� ` �,. s � `
��„ .�J
.iF ^:S� �"�'l^�.d!9!�a����� �` 1'+R��9i�� � .� � � 4� „ ..-g,�Y�! .:. IQ; s'�.i.}��" F� '°", t
+ '
_"'7:.^^-��.rm- . F� .yprae�,,t'� ' �' ; ER�}cAIAST � °YERBEN A " `"�l-�
.�
�r _R �* .� _ i.. ,.� i�, x � � � � � R`1�, w. �.. }. ��� RBENa g `� �., ,'� xk
,..����: `. (, r .i"�...i I, ;?`.� ���`� ��s�.z ;,. „` . �." � V�. ; 4 T �'^+ �� P. � '.::,� UP'iY G P� IV ir .. �.,,;-� �,. i•~ �� I±.c.�'3
� -. . ... _ ,� ;
��' -.� � � �,�r . ����" �����'� :��.� �: � --°�`" � � '��.---hw __ S LA /� �N � r /r w
�.., 4y t� a . �i Q. ' .
..- _1��� � .� ..
n s � �3; �
� � �� � �° �� �- � � - ,-��"� '�� . �����",�`�„�:�,� �:. ' '�� ' � ° i -�.;- BAY ESPLANAC�� �� �`^� �'��` .��_ r� �"�� ��� ;
.,.i� — s �, : �:, `�;� � � � ` � : �+ .
� � '�., � � ° .� � -~ ,�' ��;
.
• : �. m r ,�.
�' , �, i�� ���'�� --�� f �°m '``�� ' ,� D �?� ,• � � - } ,� �� i� �� �t� E3AY ESPLANADr_ 111►. / ��� y
c�' ''�'�:,��a��.E; ,.�i °� ' +::"��i`'� ` ��1`%'�� .� �� •'>�s -�...,�,, ��' � �' � ; l.�l ',:�.
v .
. I
« �,' °���� a ��sr'� �< ^�' � :�; r��S ��,, )`� �, _ - � BAY ESPLANADE � �er �,'"'=��� � -, ``�
,
� " /
�R.�,. * �r'� ��,. _,�• , .,�+1 � ,{. y� ;k �y*� �. ��3.; ��. -_� 1, �?�.�ai. r ''�'" +. .�rR�F: . �-�
i ,' .I� '� "�• , ! ?' *, � µ f ^e� �/ ;
1 « A 1. � ; '�,;�'�`A, e '°y �.,�t,�; �, ' I �''`"'�
. , l �.^� ;' j� . . ��M�- t# �. .J� � � ._ �, .. *�.. �"
. _. »��� . : � x � 4 '� � . - � j�� � � .
r; 1!n; �� � �°�` tl � ,.•�jt s�it m .�",} ¢l � az�r,�'�i 1 �. �� � .� i a '��. ; a�ve �' �r �` i
�^ t ' �
%w ,� ,
�� ._, r y�� ,T. �' '��, � ,k .. ; ' .�„ x' ,� �, , MvNCO s7 .. � ^� �� ��, : � . v '� x �, �
: � r..
. ., _2.,� , . w . � NGO 5 ` � � :A � a`� �-�'� �+,"� �
. . . ,'�y �ST" f e a.+Fb�TIGOSi'� .�. _;� r �-z �, ��e'^$" v °.
I ' • .. - ' �y, ' . r _ �
,i
� , . x . �, -,� �,�t „a�.�s� 5..�,^tlt'� �� � �^4 � }� ,i�rti'i . g i.�Y'� ��.-�- v,ri '�� f
� K �
` "' �. �a' , Ib- ��' '�, t ., �9� �k'�
: , . •
� n 4 �!: �"r"�� y� ��I :.��a,� "'� ft 1 -' . W ry�, �� iA�° 4�r���
��� F � y�
�. .
,
I . 4 �: N7,�, � . � � ���� i�� N M�!?�' g4 � (�' � d .�—. �3 0 �7 ` �'���K,��, .s • . .. il. pI .. � ..t4..
�, r � ..� � �� :�a� ,� � � .� ' .,... � � , "•: �z �,� �x � ,?� '.. � .
, y LL .'�'� ' ��� � . }�
,.�, W�'� a 1�' _�y�� � j. �,�!,���;,.;�"P1�4.;' �2`�{ 11�i ..� T"?p+"' Jt °�Fi . �" � �t J���.�q�"'�' ; i I��.i y '� ���V t �� r~�. � 1: "� ��7
�r } . , � .�� �. � f/ j �
- �`'�' �,� � ';4 � �� r �oi "�`y", ' - ' ' �" j�,s�,_ � .� � � i,a
�t�. . I .. _ _
�+ � + : � t ��
.m�� .� Q ,
�y .
. R�� m d� t � � 1 y��� �r'� � f#+ � ��.-.•'? � � �°"� n +n-, � r a � M' � >. . � � ���
�.� �� D� � �.� ��! �t ��l. �K � � �.�� ��4• .g. ��A ..,'� »,�, �'�'.Y� . ���' - �`/ k� b-�� y��• . � � . <� �,� �
�
�% � � ��. �k ,. .M��. R �.�"�F ' �' L�i . . � .� - ' ._.,1:� ,�ui �
'�. O ,�s ?t R� �t � �• '�' .I I .. � t�
? •-�'� � �4 d, . .� ' e r5r�� � i k���,�?'�.�roa k��.-��+ F ' ��� 1�1.a� 1, "'�� ��� `+t �� � , � r � a� �, iZ�'
� � ' � � �
w -.
.
t. ,�
:'��t. �%� aa��' . +�-_-+l � ..: _. •, � A � ._ ',�� �s.,.' ' �+°� , I `' � �;�.;,'F.. � r�
, . , r
. , .. � 4 ry
. �� - I ,
� � . �" . 'NR,: � ,�� �.", ,� W ..� � . �7 m „" � -�, : �. f �w..�' � :~ ,. 7 �, � �. �-,', � � � ��
. .
„
e� �
_ }, , �I y�
��y - .. ... 4, �: m' . : t "+' ` � • i. a Rr. ...;+,' ..a+ y�,. �'t � ` $' E1, .'" �,"�.� �: r � .
..
S�
� r h �
�
__
�
�; .,., . k.. �:� �� �^ � ,;:�,.,, ,,.�;,, �„ � > : ,, � q i � ��
.� � �,f, � :� x. `c�s^b ��Lx`I m e F }. r�"'• S. �'`� .at y '",R,.'; +�G �7 4 4� ��+�'g`*`
� a ' - '� � . `-f � e r'' " . . ''L M �k�. q i � {t, �, uw �
;�. �� , " �' *' ,. �p.c�ar�'4 � • �� � �a, ' �, � � �.��; �� � � '�°�
j, ��
.
� � , ' �� $ t ��:
.�7� --L ! . ?�.x ...,., ..nY`�!s .: . —._.._il.a� :, . . . t, . . . . � . •�$ . _ _ .... . ,
.__.� '. X.s _ 1"'. L�.. F i�t..., �._.J=° �.. . . � : '�9 T� .
N
SCALE 1 : 3,139
� _ �� �
200 0 200 400 600
FEET
w
0
Q
z
Q
J
a
�
W
�--
¢
m
�
W
�
W
>
a
SURVEY OF
801 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33767
FIP
�
�°n A �
� 25.80'
�
y N N
�
Q O N
� �
27.40'
lN
N
FIR
LOT 1, BLOCK 33, MANDALAY, ACCORDING
TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED
IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGES 32 THROUGH 35,
INCLUSIVE, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
LOT 2
N90°00'00"E 111.Q0'(M)(P}
� o.r oF�
Z
WALL 0.8'OFF
�'�� �
N
.� `.�: N
�']. ... � . � 3,e4� � �� � � s
' °.. _.
14.80'
17.88'
14.92'
�
RES# 801 ^
LOT 1 E.52'
J
J
� • ¢
� BRICK
N � ' �
Q .
BAY
WINDOW �
N _ CLF 1.1'ON �
WALL 0.8'OFr
sso°oo�oo�w � � �.oa�t�n)(P)
MANGO STREET
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
12.96' .
I BAY
I
13.7b'
C�ON PILINGS ;�
�_3 .13' ° °
I �
z
w
W �
I � �
� ~
�
� W
J
� N
17.1$' 'Q °
v
Z
UNLESS NOiED OTHERWISE, THIS IS AN AS—BUILT SURVEY SHOWING IMPROVEMENiS
IN RELATION TO PROPERTY AND PLAT lAONUAIENTS FOUND
PRIOPERTY AN� ALSO TF1I�OSE WHO PURCHASESAIORTGAGECORRGUARANiEESniE nTiE O 1 O' ZO� � 4p'
THERETO WI�7-IIN ONE YEAR OF THE FlELD DATE NOTE� ON THIS SURVEY.
SCflEB! SCALE: 1 "= 20'
��jq� E� Euw�weo p �� - .
�R� � urtxrai - X - 1' CNAINLINKrENCE
- 6"NOODFENCE
NOTES: (1) IN COAdPL1ANCE NATH F.A.C. 61G17-6.0�31-4—E, IF IOCATION OF EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS—OF—WAY OF RECORD, OTHER THAN
iHOSE ON RECORD PLATS, iS REDUIRED, TFf15 INFORMATION MUST BE FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. (2) IF APPLICABLE,
FENCES SHOWN lAEAN�ER ON OR OFF LINES. (APPROX.) (3) NO EXCAVATION OR MAPPING OF UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS HAS BEEN
PERFORMED. CORNER MARKERS ARE 1/2" DIAMEiER UNLESS N07ED OTHERWISE.
BASIS OF BEARINGS IS R/W LINE (USING PLAT BEARING OR ASSUMED) UNLESS NOTED OiHERN7SE
LEGEND: (C) s CALCUU7ED, C� = p1RVE NUTABER , CB= CABLE BOX, LP— LIGHT POLE, C/S � CalCREfE SLAB, q,F m C{{,�N L1NK FENCE, ODNC = CONCRETE
CSW = CONCRE7E SIDEWALIC, (D) = DEED, DE _ �RAINAGE EASEAIENT, E� ELECTRIC BOM EOW = EDGE OF WATER, E/P = EDGE OF PAVEAIENT, (� = FlELQ,F/C = FENCE CORNER,
FCIR � FlR CAPPED, F%C = FOUND X GUT, FCA1 e FIX1N� C�NCRETE A/ONUTAENT, FlP e FWND IRON PIPE, FlR ° FWND IRON RQO, FN � FOUND NA14 �1D = FWND NAIL k DIS1C
GA = GUY ANqiOR, ID = IDENTFlCATON, (4) � MEASURE�, AIH = MANHOLE, NCF = NO ,IARKER FWND, OHW � OVERHEAD VARE, 0/A � O�rER All� (P) � PLAT, P/E=POOL EOUIP.
PP = POWER POLE, POB = pqNT OF BEqNNING POC = PqNT OF COIAAIENCEIAENT, PRM = PERAIANENT REFERENCE YDNUNENT, R/W = RIGHT OF WAY, SIR = SET 1/2' IRON ROD
LB 6912, SND a SET NAIL AND OISK LB 6912. 7NF� TRANSFORAIER, TOB e TOP OF BANK, TPa PHONE PmESTAL, UE � U7ILITY EASEAIENT. WB - WAiER BOX, NDF = WOOp FENCE
Know It Now, Inc.
FloddaBusinessCeNfipteOf LOCATION = 2011 HEIDELBERG A�ENUE, DUNEDIN, FL
ANhorizadonNUmberL86912 VOICE 727-415-8305 FAX 727-736-24
CERTIFIED EXCLUSIVELY TO THE BELOW PARTIES
WILLIAM BLACKWOOD
� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TH�S SKE7CH OF SURVEY WAS A1qpE UNDER
A1Y RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND TO THE BEST OF AIY KNOWLEDGE AND
BELIEF SAID SURVEY AIEEfS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STqNDMDS SEf
FORTH BY THE RORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAI LAND SURVEYORS
IN CW�PTER SJ-17 RORIDA ADlAINISfRATNE CODE FURTHER , THIS
DOCUlAINT IS ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND SEALED PURSUANT TO
SEC710N 472.027, OF THE FLORIDA STATUfES AND CHAPTER
5J-17 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION CODE.
Surveya 8 Mapper Number 4636
H hY DAiE OF FlELD WORK: 4—t-13
y 7
�'� �,` '� DATE SIGNED 4-2-13
� �, � ��
�,���.
� P
FLORIDASURVEYOR@AOL.COM BILL HYATT
SCALE: 1" = 30' PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY I Application#
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
N ADJACENT DOCK
?U E
S
31.8
67.5 LF OF WATERFRONT
A
�
PARCELBOUNDARY --
4.0 �
-- DOUBLE LINE DEPICTS 42" RAILING
./— APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SEA GRASS
� AS VERIFIED BY RECENT SITE VISIT
PERFORMED BY PINELLAS COUNTY
ENVIRONMENTAI MANAGEMENT DEPT.
103.0
��'� 12.3
TE DED PROPERTY LINE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �
--18.0 ; , � 9T3
�
71.0 1 .5 r�
� �: �� _____ _____JA�
�..�_ � � 47.0 '—'
I� i 50.0
i � ;
� �:_ ='i-�
24.0 J;_ �_`i ; ;
�� � �_ �)
COVERED SLIP 14 0(-'— �•3
CTENO D PROPERTY LINE �
23.0 CLEARSPAN
60 FT ROW MANGO ST. 4.5 K LIFT
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 -11:43am F:VPROJECTSiBlack►vood 8D1 BayEsptanade (544-12)\CAD1801 BAY ESPLANADE 01082013.chrp
FLORID�l�t@R�TI�J�jATE OF WOODS CONSULTING g41 BAY ESPLANADE
A U 4 � �� 4 courmr �ow �. suire zz
.
,�� ��•';C E N s��� �� PDUN(EO �� 86-5747
� : � � ��
FAX (727 �88-7478
. Np 1558Q •:���� PROPOSED DOCK
� * �,Q M REVISED:
_ , � PLAN VIEW
: - E oF : ��
�� �; N� TOTAL SQUARE FEET 996•�
�(� R � O�•a� Q CC WATERBODY WIDTH >$50 FT
� r,, �NAL�;,� `��`° �� MHW RFRONT WID MLW 67.5 LF
1 +o.�a� _,.zs�
� �t����« —
ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988
SHEET 2
SCALc: 1" = 10' -
PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
� e n v ne n ��� �rnr_n c+� �n
Appiication tt
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
SEE SHEET 2 FOR CROSS SECTION A- A' LOCATION
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 - 11:43am F:IPROJECTS1BIackwood 801 Bay Es�anade (544-12)1CADt8U1 BAY ESPLANADE 01082013.dwg
FI (1R111� [:FRTIFif`ATF (1F
`V �`� •������ :� �j�
ti. Q'.•�GENSfi'�'•,yis�'.
'+ :� t�
; '� • NO 1558l1 f*��R
.
= * � .� _ �a
� • �
�J • �,
19 A'j� � OF .•kj. �j NN
� � I� � P� •`��y-hC�
� .. `O.r �.,� `�,¢
� �1 ••••••• �v�'1 03_S�
�����j►,�NA �E�`�� ���'�-
WOOQS CONSULTING
��it couHn Ro,�o �, SIlRE 22
DUNEO�N FL 34698
PN. (72�5 786-57�7
FAX (727) 786-7479
REVISED:
801 BAY ESPLANADE
CRC�SS SECTION A - A'
SHEET 3
SCALE: NONE
PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY I pPP�ication�E
(t is the inteni of the fotlowing construction cletails to be a roference guide for quality, structurai and safety
standards. All structures to meet local, and or state guidelines for aquatic and marine construction.
GENERAL DOCK NOTES:
1. ALL DECKING TQ BE TRIMME�, BOTH SIDES.
2. ALL PlLINGS TO BE SEATED WITH A FREE FALLING HAMMER IF WATER JETTING IS INSTALLATION METHOD. ALL PILES TO BE
TRIMMED SAME HEIGNT.
3. PILING CENTER TO CENTER SPACING QN AlL FIXED DOCKS TO BE 10' NOMINAL. ANO NOT TO EXCEED 12'.
h. DOCK FRAMING AND DECKING TO BE CONSTRUCTED USWG STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS (SCREWS TO BE TYPE SPECIFIC FOR
MATERIAL UTfLIZED).
5. WOOO DECK BOARD SPAC}NG AT TIME OF INSTALLATION NOT TO EXCEED 1/8" TO ALLOW FOR CURING, COMPOSITE DECK
SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 1/4".
6. ALL DOCK FRAMING 07HER THAN DEGKING TO BE MINIMUM GRADE 2 LUMBER.
7. RASP OR FEATNER ALL SAWCUTS.
8. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO MEET OR EXCEED COUNTY REQUIREMENTS USTED IN SECTIONS 166-(332, 333, & 334) OF
THE PINELLAS COUNTY WATER AND NAVIGATION CONTROL AUTHORITY REGULATtONS MANUAI.
�J. CCA WOOD NOl" ACCEPTABLE FOR DECKING OR RAt1.1NG MATERIALS. WOOD TREATMENT AS FOLLOWS ARE ACCEPTABLE:
ALKAUNE COPPER QUATERNARY {ACQ), IF ACQ 7REATMENT IS UTI�IZED, THEN THE WOOD NEEDS TO BE SEAIED WITH AN
ENGINEER-APPROVED SEAIANT.
10. IF A MAIN DOCK SUPPORT PFLtNG FALLS !N CLOSE PROXIMITY {LESS THAN 2 FEE� TO A BOLLARD PILING REQUIRED FOR A
FINGER PIER, THE BOLLARD PILING MAY BE USED FOR BOTH PURPOSES PROVIOING THE CENTER TO CENTER SPANS OF THE
DOCK SUPPORT PIUNGS DO NOT EXCEED 12 FEET.
11. 5B" GALVANtZED FASTENERS ARE NOT TO BE USED IN WOQD WITH COPPER AZOLE TREATMEN7
12. PILES TO BE WRAPPED FROM THE MUD (SIL� LINE TO 2.0' ABOVE THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE (MHWL). WtTH PRIME HIGH
DEN�ITY P�LYETHY�ENE 30 MILS OR .030" THICK
13. ALL WOOD PLANKING WHICH IS TO BE OVER AN AREA OF SEAGRASS, IF PRESENT, SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 8" WIDE AND
HAVE A MINIMUM SPACWG OF NO LESS THAN 1/2" APART AFTER SMRINKAGE.
14. PILINGS TO BE INSTALLED tN AREAS CONTAINING SEAGRASS, IF PRESENT, TO BE INSTALLED BY JETTING WITH A 3" PUMP
REDUCED TO A 1 4" (JET PiPE), AUGERING AND DRIVtNG. SHOULD ANY ACCUMUTATION OF SEDIMENT OCCUR AT TNE BASE OF
THE PILING, IT IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE GRASS AREA.
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 -1'1:43am F:11'ROJECTS1BIackwood 801 Bay Esplanacie (544-12)1CAD1fS01 BAY ESPIANADE 01082013.dwg
,,�v r-.`GE��.�
�� . � S�
� � o .f 588lf
_
-� *
' o�
r
��
•
• ` Q Q`.
' •...•••�
�'�., NA� EN
� ►M�ii�►��`'
TE OF WOODS CONSULTING
�� i»4 courmr ao� i, suire 2z
�.�i��, �au�� �ss 4� i
�� ,A � FAX �727� 788-7479
�
REVISED:
� / : '' ' � ` �
PROPOSED DOCK
NOTES
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY}
ELECTRIC CONDUIT
PVC WATER LINE
UTILITY SECTION VIEW
DECK SCREW PATfERN
INTERMEDIATE STRINGER
�I LAP JOINT Iril
���
DOUBIE STRUJGERSMtN.
4' OYERLAP
IlJTERMEDIATE STRINGER
A1Itl. 2' OVERLAP
tx �.+nu. o.c. (
� 10' NOh11NAL SPACING O.C. !
SHEET [}
SCALE: NONE
2" X 6" RAIt
2" X 6" RAILS
EQUALLY
SPACEC
HANDRAIL DETAtL
(147A LF iOTAL)
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 - 11;Q�aqr1 kFj'if��tQJECT:
♦� �
. N0 1g�a�
:
. *
r •
. ' T T
: 1 '� OF
.� p ' O �.��,
��•• ....•• �
G
, L EN ��
� ..�r�,,,,�,,
PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMI�Y I Appiication�
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
NOTE: IF COh9POSiTE DECKiNG IS USED.
O.C. STRINGER SPACING TO BE VIA
MANUFACNRES SPECIFtCAT{ONS, NOT TO EITHER 514"X�" SAWN
EXCEED 24" O.C. p��LIAN HARDWOaD, 2" X �" PT, OR �\ � STANCHIONS PLACED 5ACO.C.E,
COMPOSITE DECKINO
4" X 4" HANORAIL
STANCHIONS
PLACED 5.0' O.C.
AUNG TO BE fASTENED TO
RINGERS WJ SHORT BOIT,
fD FASTENED TO PiLE WITH
�NGER BOIT WHEN AVAILABLE
�
�
��
2" X 10" INTERMEOIATE
STRINGER MAX. 2.0'
O.C. CCA OR ACQ .6U RET.
AlL BOLTING TO BE 5/8" S!S
MINIMUM PILE BENT BRACING:
nlL PILE BENTS TO BE
CROSS BRACED WITH
2" X 10" i�2 S4S CCA 2.5 RET.
ONE SIDE ONLY
0
0
O
0
�o �
0
° 22 DEG MtN
° 45 DEG MAX
0
DOUBLE STRINGER 7' X 10"
fl2 S4S CCA OR ACQ .60 RET.
� 2" X 10" 1�2 S4S CCA
2.5 RET. ONE [ACH SIDE
2" X 10` #2 S4S
CCA 2.5 RET. ALL PILE CAPS & CROSS
BRACING 8 BRACING TO BE DOUBLE
BLOCKING BOLTED AS 3PECIFtED
NOTE:
ALL INTERMEDIATE STRINGERS TO BE
LAP JOINTED AT BEN7S 2.0' MIN.
MAI N DOCK & WALKOUT h11N 10" TIP PILING 2.5 C.C.A. RET.
SET BU7T DOWN. MfN 8.0' PENETRATION.
801 Bay Esplanade (544-12)1CAD�801 BAY ESPLANADE 01082013.dvx,�
' WOODS CONSULTING g01 BAY ESPLANADE
171I COVNfY ROAD 1. SURE 22
OUNEDIN FL 34698
FAX f727) 788-7479
PROPOSED DOCK
REV�sEO: D ETA I LS
SHEET �j
SCALE: NONE PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY I Application�F
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
TYPICAL 4 POLE BOAT LIFT
MIN 4.5 K LIFT CAPACITY
Thu, 25 Apr 2073i�`�rf�MlF�p�OJECTS\Blackv�ood 801 Eiay Espionade (544-12)1C�D1fl01 F3AY [SPLANAD[ 01082013.d�vg
��l�t { {!.` F r1F
.,`
.
�
�
��
.
i
'%' r s =`�� =
� SeB � �w
• i
* , �r
� � � �
: ° �m
OF � $o
. � N�
I"� D p, �^^
� •`� � fl:NN
�AL�E���``� �a�c
�r;s1��+`� o �1�ud
N�V-�
N
U
WOODS CONSULTING
1714 CWNtt ROAD 1, SURE 12
DUItE01N FL 3469A
P}{. 72�� 786-5747
FAX �727) 78B-7�79
REVISED:
801 BAY ESPLANADE
PROPOSED
BOAT LI FT
DETA(LS
SHEET ('j
SCALE: 1" = 30'
TURBIDITY CURTAINS TO
REMAIN IN PLACE
THROUGHOUT
CONSTRUCTION
PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY I Application#
• , _�
jf
�, ��� ���.
f
.
�
i
;
f'
.._... ,..._......' r
WATER LEVEL CONNECTING RODS
FLOAT
�
S� LAMINATED
FLOOR VINYL-POLYESTER
� � 2�� M� FABRIC
CHAIN WEIGHTED
TYPICAL FLOATING TURBIDITY CURTAINS
NOT TO SCALE (DESIGN BY AER-FLO INC.)
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 -11:42am F:iPRoJECTS161ack�vood 801 f3ay Esplanade (544-72)1CA01,B01 BAY ESPLANADE 01082a13.dtivg
FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF �/OODS CONSULTING
AUTH �''I �66� t7t4 �►�,� ,, S�RE � 801 BAY ESPLANADE
I� pUfi(EOpJ FL 34698
•� C � Ai'�����i � (727� 788-7479
• � �%/,''���
,�� Q� i -N
f �
A 1 O P.•' w�i �
•••....•••
A L ENa�.����,
���r������t�
REV(SED:
TURBIDITY CONTROL
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
N
�� � ,
� s�
SHEET ]