04/15/2013
WORK SESSION AGENDA
Council Chambers - City Hall
4/15/2013 - 1:00 PM
1. Presentations
1.1Service Awards
Attachments
1.2Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2012.
Attachments
1.3Provide information on the development of the City’s Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan (PDRP). (WSO)
Attachments
2. Economic Development and Housing
2.1Approve request from 1409 Alpine Road, LLC to sell 4 condominium units at $117,000, write-off
remainder of HOME loan balance estimated at $401,131.54, and authorize the appropriate officials to
execute same. (consent)
Attachments
3. Human Resources
3.1Approve renewal of the City’s Statutory Death Benefits Policy with The Hartford Financial Services
Group, providing accidental death and disability coverages for all full-time Law Enforcement Officers,
Firefighters, and applicable Administrators, for the two-year period retroactive to October 1, 2012 and
continuing through September 30, 2014, at a cost of $21,818, pre-paid for the two-year period. (consent)
Attachments
4. Marine and Aviation
4.1 Authorize the execution of Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement (JPA) Number 1 between the City
of Clearwater and the State of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT); approve transferring
$6,215.16 from Airpark Retained Earnings to cover the City 20% match for Airpark improvements, and
adopt Resolution 13-07.
Attachments
5. Parks and Recreation
5.1Accept a Modification of Deed granted by U.S. Home Corporation, former owners of real property
currently owned by the City for use as the Countryside Recreation Center. (consent)
Attachments
5.2Award a contract (purchase order) to Landscape Structures Inc. of Delano, MN for the construction and
installation of a one of a kind Sand Castle Playground and Welcome sign at Pier 60 Park for $438,881 and
approve the transfer of $100,000 from unappropriated retained earnings to CIP 315-93624 Pier 60 Park
Repair and Improvement at mid-year, to construct a military flag plaza to be located in Pier 60 Park.
(consent)
Attachments
5.3Approve co-sponsorship and waiver of requested City fees and service charges for Fiscal Year 2013/14
special events, including five annual City events and twelve City co-sponsored events, at an estimated
General Fund cost of $381,860 ($24,300 cash contributions and $357,560 in-kind contributions) and
Enterprise Fund cost and fee waiver of $86,010, for the purposes of Fiscal Year 2013/14 departmental
budget submittals. (consent)
Attachments
6. Solid Waste/General Support Services
6.1Award a Contract (Purchase Order) for $253,497.00 to RingPower of Riverview, FL for one Caterpillar
M322 Hydraulic Excavator, Wheeled Type, in accordance with Sec. 2.564(1)(d), Code of Ordinances -
Other Governmental bid; authorize lease purchase under the City's Master Lease Purchase Agreement and
authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
Attachments
6.2Award a Contract (Purchase Order) for $303,520.10 to Rush Truck Center of Tampa, FL for one Peterbilt
Model 320 chassis with E-Z Pack CFL 35 Cubic Yard Body, in accordance with Sec. 2.564(1)(d), Code of
Ordinances - Other governmental bid; authorize lease purchase under the City's Master Lease Purchase
Agreement and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
Attachments
7. Public Utilities
7.1Approve a $252,000.00 Blanket Purchase Order, from May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2014, to Water
Specialists Technologies LLC, of Sanford, FL for the purchase of copper precipitant TR-50, and authorize
the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
Attachments
7.2Approve a Blanket Purchase Order to T. Wayne Hill Trucking, Inc., of Bartow, FL in the amount of
$1,636,000.08 for biosolids services for a one-year period with two optional annual extensions, and
authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
Attachments
8. Engineering
8.1Approve Change Order 2 to Layne Inliner, LLC in the amount of $420,000.00 for sanitary sewer line
cleaning and inspection at various locations throughout the City of Clearwater for a new contract total of
$1,620,000.00; and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
Attachments
8.2Approve Parking Consultant of Record contracts with Kimley-Horn and Associates; TimHaahs; and
Walker Parking Consultants for a period of three years, commencing April 22, 2013, and authorize the
appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
Attachments
8.3Award a contract to Steve’s Excavating and Paving Inc. of Clearwater, Florida, for Tropic Hills
Stormwater Outfall Project Phase III (11-0040-EN), in the amount of $1,449,371.28, which is the lowest
responsible bid received in accordance with the plans and specifications and authorize the appropriate
officials to execute same. (consent)
Attachments
9. Planning
9.1Approve the annexation, initial Future Land Use Map designations of Residential Low (RL), Preservation
(P) and Drainage Feature Overlay and initial Zoning Atlas designations of Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR) and Preservation (P) districts for 1861 and 1880 Diane Drive; 1744 Evans Drive;
1716 and 1733 Grove Drive; 1765 Lucas Drive; 1806 Marilyn Drive; 1848 and 1851 Skyland Drive; 2720
and 2724 Morningside Drive; and 2724 and 2728 Woodring Drive (all parcels are located in Section 05,
Township 29 South, Range 16 East); and pass Ordinances 8392-13, 8393-13 and 8394-13 on first reading.
(ATA2013-01001)
Attachments
9.2Approve the Annexation, Initial Land Use Plan Designation of Residential Low (RL) and Initial Zoning
Atlas Designation of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for 1825 Carlton Drive (Lot 4,
Block C, Carlton Terrace in Section 5, Township 29 South, Range 16 East); and pass Ordinances 8389-
13, 8390-13 and 8391-13 on first reading. (ANX2013-01002)
Attachments
10. Official Records and Legislative Services
10.1Appoint members to the Public Art and Design Board as follows: two members with terms to expire April
30, 2017 and one member to fill the remainder of an unexpired term to expire February 28, 2014.
Attachments
10.2Approve the 2013 Federal Legislative Package.
Attachments
11. Legal
11.1Adopt Ordinance 8383-13 on second reading, vacating that certain 40-foot platted right-of-way abutting
and lying east of Lots 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18, dedicated and described in the Plat titled “Elysium –
Phase 1” as recorded in Plat Book 93, Pages 41-46, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, subject to
conditions.
Attachments
12. City Manager Verbal Reports
12.1City Manager Verbal Reports
Attachments
13. Closing Comments by Mayor
14. Adjourn
15. Presentation(s) for Council Meeting
15.1Service Awards
Attachments
15.2Child Abuse Prevention Month Proclamation - Mike Carroll, SunCoast Regional Director of the
Department of Children and Families.
Attachments
15.3Arbor Day Proclamation - Chuck Porthouse, Parks and Rec.
Attachments
15.4Clearwater Fire and Rescue Local 1158 Appreciation Month Proclamation - Lt. Patrick Conrey with
Clearwater Fire and Rescue
Attachments
15.5National Crime Victims Week Proclamation - Yolanda Cowart, Founder of the Springtime Club
Attachments
15.6Pinellas County Economic Development Presentation - Mike Meidel, Dir. Pinellas County
Attachments
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Service Awards
SUMMARY:
5 Years of Service
John Pittman Solid Waste
Michael Hasty Police
Margaret Hasty Police
10 Years of Service
Felicia Leonard Parks and Recreation
Louis Beem Solid Waste
Kelly Hollinger Finance
Michael Olsa Public Utilities
15 Years of Service
Georgia Calder Parks and Recreation
20 Years of Service
James Charon Public Utilities
Ramon Cosme Police
Ethridge Hall Police
Joyce Kirchoffer Library
25 Years of Service
Larry Roberts Engineering/Stormwater
William New Public Utilities
Review Approval:1) Human Resources
Cover Memo
Item # 1
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2012.
SUMMARY:
The City's external auditors, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., will present the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and the
results of the City's audit for Fiscal Year 2012.
Review Approval:1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Assistant City Manager 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 2
2
0
1
1
/
2
0
1
2
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 184
Item # 2
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 184
Item # 2
George N. Cretekos
Mayor
Doreen Hock-DiPolito Jay Polglaze Bill Jonson Paul Gibson
Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
William B. Horne II
City Manager
Brian Jay Ravins
Finance Director
Prepared by: City of Clearwater Finance Department
City of Clearwater, Florida
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012
i
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 184
Item # 2
ii
City of Clearwater, Florida
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTORY SECTION:
Title Page and List of Elected and Appointed Officials .......................................................................................... i
Letter of Transmittal ............................................................................................................................................... v
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ....................................................................... ix
Organizational Chart .............................................................................................................................................. x
FINANCIAL SECTION:
Independent Auditor’s Report ................................................................................................................................ 1
Management’s Discussion and Analysis ............................................................................................................... 3
Basic Financial Statements:
Government-wide Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Assets ............................................................................................................................. 18
Statement of Activities ................................................................................................................................. 19
Fund Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet – Governmental Funds ..................................................................................................... 20
Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Assets ............... 21
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds .......... 22
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances
of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities ........................................................................... 23
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances -
Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Basis) – General Fund ...................................................................... 24
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances -
Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) – Special Development Fund ......................................................... 25
Statement of Net Assets – Proprietary Funds .......................................................................................... 26
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Assets – Proprietary Funds ................. 30
Statement of Cash Flows – Proprietary Funds ......................................................................................... 34
Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets – Fiduciary Funds ............................................................................. 38
Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Assets - Fiduciary Funds ........................................................... 39
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ...................................................................................................... 40
Required Supplementary Information - Pension Trust Funds:
Schedules of Funding Progress ................................................................................................................... 86
Schedules of Employer Contributions .......................................................................................................... 87
Notes to Schedules of Required Pension Supplementary Information ....................................................... 88
Required Supplementary Information – Other Post-Employment Benefits:
Schedule of Funding Progress ..................................................................................................................... 89
Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules:
Combining Balance Sheet – Nonmajor Governmental Funds .................................................................... 94
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances –
Nonmajor Governmental Funds ................................................................................................................. 96
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance –
Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis) – Community Redevelopment Agency Special Revenue Fund ......... 99
Combining Statement of Net Assets – Nonmajor Enterprise Funds ......................................................... 102
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Assets -
Nonmajor Enterprise Funds ...................................................................................................................... 104
Combining Statement of Cash Flows - Nonmajor Enterprise Funds ........................................................ 106
Combining Statement of Net Assets – Internal Service Funds ................................................................. 112
Attachment number 1 \nPage 4 of 184
Item # 2
iii
City of Clearwater, Florida
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Assets –
Internal Service Funds ................................................................................................................................. 113
Combining Statement of Cash Flows – Internal Service Funds ......................................................................... 114
Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets – Fiduciary Funds ..................................................................... 118
Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Assets – Fiduciary Funds ................................................. 119
Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities – Treasurer’s Escrow Agency Fund ....................................... 120
Supplementary Information:
Continuing Disclosure – Gas System Revenue Bonds, Series 2004, 2005, and 2007 ..................................... 122
Continuing Disclosure – Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2003, 2006, 2009A, 2009B and 2011 ....... 127
Continuing Disclosure – Stormwater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2004, 2005 and 2012 ......................... 130
Fire Services Program ......................................................................................................................................... 131
STATISTICAL SECTION:
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 133
Schedule 1 Net Assets by Component .................................................................................................................... 135
Schedule 2 Changes in Net Assets ......................................................................................................................... 136
Schedule 2a Program Revenues by Function/Program ............................................................................................ 139
Schedule 3 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds ............................................................................................... 140
Schedule 4 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds ........................................................................... 141
Schedule 5 Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property .................................................... 142
Schedule 6 Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates ........................................................................................ 143
Schedule 7 Property Tax Levies and Collections .................................................................................................... 144
Schedule 8a Principal Real Property Taxpayers ....................................................................................................... 145
Schedule 8b Principal Personal Property Taxpayers ................................................................................................ 146
Schedule 9 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type .................................................................................................... 147
Schedule 10 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding ....................................................................................... 148
Schedule 11 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt......................................................................... 149
Schedule 12 Legal Debt Margin Information ............................................................................................................. 150
Schedule 13 Pledged-Revenue Coverage ................................................................................................................ 151
Schedule 14 Demographic and Economic Statistics ................................................................................................. 153
Schedule 15 Principal Employers .............................................................................................................................. 154
Schedule 16 Full-time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function/Program ........................................... 155
Schedule 17 Operating Indicators by Function/Program .......................................................................................... 156
Schedule 18 Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program ...................................................................................... 157
SINGLE AUDIT / GRANTS COMPLIANCE SECTION:
Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other
Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government
Auditing Standards ................................................................................................................................................ 161
Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance with Requirements that Could Have a Direct and Material Effect
on Each Major Program and on Internal Control Over Compliance in Accordance With OMB Circular
A-133 and Chapter 10.550, Rules of the Auditor General of the State of Florida............................................... 163
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance Projects ............................................ 165
Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance Projects .............................. 168
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs ................................................................................................................ 169
Independent Auditor’s Management Letter ................................................................................................................... 171
Attachment number 1 \nPage 5 of 184
Item # 2
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
iv
Attachment number 1 \nPage 6 of 184
Item # 2
Attachment number 1 \nPage 7 of 184
Item # 2
Attachment number 1 \nPage 8 of 184
Item # 2
Attachment number 1 \nPage 9 of 184
Item # 2
Attachment number 1 \nPage 10 of 184
Item # 2
ix
Attachment number 1 \nPage 11 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater Organizational Chart
Customer
Service
Economic
Development &
Housing
Gas System
Marine &
Aviation
Emergency
Management
Police
Department
Public
Communications
City Auditor
Fire Department
Official Records
& Legislative
Services
Parks &
Recreation
Human
Resources
Information
Technology
Planning &
Development
Solid Waste /
General Support
Services
Library
Financial
Services
Public Utilities
Citizens of Clearwater
City Council
Office of
Management &
Budget
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
City Attorney
Assistant City Manager
Engineering
x
Attachment number 1 \nPage 12 of 184
Item # 2
1
Attachment number 1 \nPage 13 of 184
Item # 2
2
Attachment number 1 \nPage 14 of 184
Item # 2
3
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis report provides the reader with a narrative overview and analysis of the
financial activities of the City for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
(MD&A) should be read in conjunction with the City’s Transmittal Letter, which begins on page vii of this report.
Financial Highlights
The City’s assets exceeded its liabilities at the close of fiscal year 2012 by $765.8 million (net assets). Of this
amount, $231.9 million (unrestricted net assets) may be used to meet the government’s ongoing obligations to
citizens and creditors.
The City’s total net assets increased by $20.0 million, or 2.7%, during fiscal 2012. Net assets for governmental
activities increased by $811 thousand, or .21%, while the business-type net assets increased by $19.2 million,
or 5.5%.
Significant factors contributing to the $811 thousand increase in governmental net assets included an increase
of net program expense of $1.7 million from the prior year as a result of a decrease in charges for services of
$1.3 million and a decrease in operating and capital grants and contributions totaling $1.4 million, offset by a
decrease of $998 thousand in governmental expenses. General revenues remained flat in total as a $1.3
million decrease in property tax revenues due to declining property values was offset by an increase of $1.5
million in transfers from business-type activities.
The $19.2 million increase in business-type net assets is primarily the result of net program revenues of $24.5
million, an increase of $5.7 million from the prior year, as a result of an increase in program revenues of $5.1
million from the prior year in addition to a decrease in program expenses of $678 thousand. Revenues from
charges for services increased $2.9 million, primarily in the Water & Sewer Utility while operating and capital
grants and contributions also increased $2.2 million, also primarily in the Water & Sewer Utility.
At September 30, 2012, the City’s governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $112.5
million, an increase of $3.9 million, or 3.6%, in comparison with the prior year. Of this amount, $19.9 million (or
17.7%) is available for spending at the government’s discretion (unassigned fund balance).
At September 30, 2012, unrestricted fund balance (the total of the committed, assigned and unassigned
components of fund balance) for the general fund was $23.1 million, or 22.0% of total current year general fund
expenditures.
Total outstanding long-term debt decreased $5.2 million due to principal payments on bonds payable in the
amount of $7.7 million offset by an increase the liability for other postemployment benefits of $1.5 million, an
increase in claims payable of $700 thousand, and an increase in lease purchase contracts of $300 thousand.
Overview of the Financial Statements
This discussion and analysis (MD&A) is intended to serve as an introduction to the City of Clearwater’s basic financial
statements. The City’s basic financial statements are comprised of three components: 1) government-wide financial
statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other
supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves.
Government-Wide Financial Statements
The government-wide financial statements are the statement of net assets and the statement of activities. These
statements report information about the City as a whole using accounting methods similar to those used by private-
sector businesses. Emphasis is placed on the net assets of governmental activities and business-type activities, and the
Attachment number 1 \nPage 15 of 184
Item # 2
4
change in net assets. Governmental activities are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues.
Governmental activities include most of the City’s basic services, including police, fire, public works, parks and
recreation, and general administration. Business-type activities are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their
costs through user fees and charges. The City’s water and sewer system, stormwater system, gas system, solid waste,
recycling, marine, aviation, convention center, Clearwater Harbor Marina, and parking system operations are reported
as business-type activities.
The statement of net assets presents information on all of the City’s assets and liabilities, with the difference
between the two reported as net assets. Over time, increases or decreases in net assets may serve as a useful
indicator as to whether the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating. Net assets are reported in
three major categories: 1) invested in capital assets, net of related debt; 2) restricted; and 3) unrestricted.
The statement of activities presents information showing how the City’s net assets changed as a result of the
year’s activities. All changes in net assets are recorded in the period in which the underlying event takes place,
which may differ from the period in which cash is received or disbursed. The Statement of Activities displays the
expense of the City’s various programs net of related revenues, as well as a separate presentation of revenues
available for general purposes.
The government-wide financial statements include not only the City of Clearwater itself but also the Clearwater
Redevelopment Agency (CRA). The CRA, though legally separate, is reported as part of the primary government as a
blended component unit due to the City Council serving as the CRA’s governing board.
Fund Financial Statements
A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for
specific activities or objectives. The fund financial statements provide detailed information about the City’s major funds –
not the City as a whole. Fund accounting helps to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal
requirements. Based on restrictions on the use of monies, the City has established many funds that account for the
multitude of services provided to residents. These fund financial statements focus on the City’s most significant funds:
governmental, proprietary, and fiduciary.
Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to report most of the City’s basic services. These funds are used
to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial
statements. The funds focus on the inflows and outflows of current resources and the balances of spendable resources
available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government’s near-term financing
requirements.
Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide financial statements, it is useful
to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental
activities in the government-wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact
of the government’s near-term financing decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and the governmental
fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this
comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities.
The City maintains ten individual governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental funds
balance sheet and in the governmental funds statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances for
the General, Special Development, and Capital Improvement funds, which are considered to be major funds. Data from
the other seven governmental funds are combined into a single aggregated columnar presentation. Individual fund data
for each of these nonmajor governmental funds is provided in the form of combining statements in the supplementary
information section of this report.
Annual appropriated budgets are adopted for the General Fund, the Special Development Special Revenue Fund, and
the Community Redevelopment Agency Special Revenue Fund. Budgetary comparison statements and/or schedules
have been provided for these funds to demonstrate budgetary compliance.
The basic governmental fund financial statements can be found on pages 20-25 of this report.
Proprietary funds. The City maintains two different types of proprietary funds. Enterprise funds are used to report the
same functions presented as business-type activities in the government-wide financial statements. The City uses
Attachment number 1 \nPage 16 of 184
Item # 2
5
enterprise funds to account for the fiscal activities related to water and sewer, gas, solid waste and stormwater utilities,
along with recycling, marine, aviation, parking system, Harborview Convention Center, and Clearwater Harbor Marina
boat slip operations. Internal service funds are an accounting device used to accumulate and allocate costs internally
among the City’s various functions. The City uses internal service funds to account for the City’s building maintenance,
custodial services, self-insurance program, risk management program, employee group insurance, vehicle acquisition
and maintenance, and various support activities including data processing, legal, telecommunications, and postal
services. All of the City’s internal service funds predominantly benefit governmental activities and consequently have
been aggregated and included within governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements.
Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government-wide financial statements, only in more
detail. The proprietary fund financial statements provide separate information for the Water and Sewer Utility, Gas
Utility, Solid Waste Utility, and Stormwater Utility enterprise funds, which are considered to be major funds of the City.
The remaining six non-major enterprise funds are combined into a single aggregated presentation in the proprietary
fund financial statements. Similarly, governmental activity internal service funds are aggregated into a single
presentation. Individual fund data for the non-major enterprise funds and the internal service funds is provided in the
form of combining statements in the supplementary information section of this report.
The basic proprietary fund financial statements can be found on pages 26-37 of this report.
Fiduciary funds. Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the
government. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government-wide financial statements because the resources of
the fiduciary funds are not available to support the City’s own programs. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is
similar to proprietary funds.
The City of Clearwater maintains two different types of fiduciary funds. Pension trust funds are used to report resources
held in trust for retirees and beneficiaries covered by the city’s pension plans. An agency fund is used to report
resources held by the city in a custodial capacity for individuals, private organizations and other governments, such as
the Clearwater Downtown Development Board.
The fiduciary fund statements can be found on pages 38-39 of this report.
Notes to the Financial Statements
The notes to the financial statements provide additional information that is essential for a full understanding of the
information provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements, including the City’s progress in funding its
obligations to provide pension benefits and other post-employment benefits to its employees.
The notes to the financial statements can be found on pages 40-85 of this report.
Other Information
In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report also presents certain required
supplementary information concerning the City’s progress in funding its obligations to provide pension benefits and
other post-employment benefits to its employees.
Required supplementary information can be found on pages 86-89 of this report.
The combining statements referred to earlier in connection with non-major governmental funds, non-major enterprise
funds, and internal service funds, are presented immediately following the required supplementary information.
Combining and individual fund statements can be found on pages 91-120 of this report.
Government-Wide Financial Analysis
The overall financial position of the City improved in both the fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 years. As noted earlier, net
assets may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government’s financial position. In the case of the City, assets
exceeded liabilities by $765.8 million at the close of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. This represents an
increase of $20.0 million from the September 30, 2011 total net assets of $745.8 million. The City reports positive
balances in all three categories of net assets, both for the government as a whole as well as for its separate
governmental and business-type activities, for both the current year and the prior year, as indicated in the following
table:
Attachment number 1 \nPage 17 of 184
Item # 2
6
201220112012201120122011
Assets
Current and other assets170,954,873$ 165,204,443$ 229,378,382$ 224,466,572$ 400,333,255$ 389,671,015$
Capital assets273,939,267 277,160,493 387,040,148 379,223,599 660,979,415 656,384,092
Total assets444,894,140 442,364,936 616,418,530 603,690,171 1,061,312,670 1,046,055,107
Liabilities
Current and other liabilities7,316,832 7,287,274 15,612,447 15,210,298 22,929,279 22,497,572
Long-term debt outstanding:
Due within one year10,442,975 10,351,270 8,733,050 8,532,700 19,176,025 18,883,970
Due in more than one year31,581,421 29,984,731 221,859,874 228,928,800 253,441,295 258,913,531
Total liabilities49,341,228 47,623,275 246,205,371 252,671,798 295,546,599 300,295,073
Net assets
Invested in capital assets,
net of related debt254,580,741 257,542,168 163,315,616 159,912,679 417,896,357 417,454,847
Restricted60,764,393 57,244,544 55,204,599 55,039,183 115,968,992 112,283,727
Unrestricted80,207,778 79,954,949 151,692,944 136,066,511 231,900,722 216,021,460
Total net assets395,552,912$ 394,741,661$ 370,213,159$ 351,018,373$ 765,766,071$ 745,760,034$
City of Clearwater, Florida - Net Assets
Governmental ActivitiesBusiness-type ActivitiesTotal
A large portion of the City’s net assets (54.6%) represent its investment in capital assets (e.g., land, infrastructure, land
improvements, buildings, and equipment), less any related outstanding debt used to acquire those assets. The City
uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens, and consequently these assets are not available for future
spending. Although the City’s investment in capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the
resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other resources, since the capital assets themselves will not
be used to liquidate these liabilities.
There was a $3.0 million, or 1.1%, decrease in invested in capital assets, net of related debt for governmental activities
versus the previous year. The decrease was due to a decrease in related revenue bond debt due to $570 thousand in
scheduled bond principal payments, offset by an increase of $336 thousand in capital lease purchase contracts, plus a
net decrease of $3.2 million in governmental capital assets for the current fiscal year. The decrease in governmental
capital assets resulted from capital asset additions of $12.8 million that were offset by depreciation expense of $15.8
million and net capital asset retirements totaling approximately $200 thousand. See the following discussions of capital
assets and long term debt for more information on current year activity.
Invested in capital assets, net of related debt for business-type activities increased by $3.4 million, or 2.1%, due to
$26.3 million of capital asset additions, offset by $18.5 million in current year depreciation expense, $17 thousand in
capital asset disposals, and a $4.4 million increase in related bond debt, net of unspent bond proceeds. The $4.4 million
increase in related bond debt, net of unspent bond proceeds, was the result of $7.1 million of scheduled principal
payments, offset by the current year spend-down of bond proceeds.
An additional portion of the City’s net assets (15.1%) represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on
how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net assets ($231.9 million or 30.3%) may be used to
meet the government’s ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors.
Changes in Net Assets
The following table reflects the changes in net assets for the years ended September 30, 2012, and September 30,
2011:
Attachment number 1 \nPage 18 of 184
Item # 2
7
201220112012201120122011
Revenues
Program revenues:
Charges for services36,223,368$ 37,493,034$ 146,399,009$ 143,518,556$ 182,622,377$ 181,011,590$
Operating grants and contributions8,521,483 8,061,861 134,384 133,519 8,655,867 8,195,380
Capital grants and contributions845,083 2,765,599 7,469,212 5,289,674 8,314,295 8,055,273
General revenues:
Property taxes37,938,122 39,252,898 - - 37,938,122 39,252,898
Sales taxes14,092,330 13,384,678 - - 14,092,330 13,384,678
Utility taxes12,735,312 13,228,749 - - 12,735,312 13,228,749
Other taxes12,975,557 13,303,118 - - 12,975,557 13,303,118
Other2,859,190 3,090,805 3,644,389 3,496,865 6,503,579 6,587,670
Total revenues126,190,445 130,580,742 157,646,994 152,438,614 283,837,439 283,019,356
Expenses
General Government14,229,768 16,183,344 - - 14,229,768 16,183,344
Public Safety67,559,303 66,913,985 - - 67,559,303 66,913,985
Physical Environment3,189,096 3,868,026 - - 3,189,096 3,868,026
Transportation13,431,695 13,274,877 - - 13,431,695 13,274,877
Economic Environment2,240,637 3,113,409 - - 2,240,637 3,113,409
Human Services185,966 181,483 - - 185,966 181,483
Culture and Recreation32,814,030 30,606,145 - - 32,814,030 30,606,145
Interest on Long-term Debt708,978 1,216,684 - - 708,978 1,216,684
Water and Sewer Utility- - 59,405,815 61,010,369 59,405,815 61,010,369
Gas Utility- - 27,661,721 28,353,645 27,661,721 28,353,645
Solid Waste Utility- - 16,632,374 15,843,532 16,632,374 15,843,532
Stormwater Utility- - 12,846,590 12,234,015 12,846,590 12,234,015
Other- - 12,925,429 12,708,363 12,925,429 12,708,363
Total expenses134,359,473 135,357,953 129,471,929 130,149,924 263,831,402 265,507,877
(8,169,028) (4,777,211) 28,175,065 22,288,690 20,006,037 17,511,479
Transfers8,980,279 7,510,477 (8,980,279) (7,510,477) - -
Increase in net assets 811,251 2,733,266 19,194,786 14,778,213 20,006,037 17,511,479
Net assets - beginning394,741,661 392,008,395 351,018,373 336,240,160 745,760,034 728,248,555
Net assets - ending395,552,912$ 394,741,661$ 370,213,159$ 351,018,373$ 765,766,071$ 745,760,034$
City of Clearwater, Florida - Changes in Net Assets
transfers
Governmental ActivitiesBusiness-type ActivitiesTotals
Increase in net assets before
Governmental Activities
Net assets of governmental activities increased by $811 thousand from $394.7 million as of September 30, 2011, to
$395.5 million as of September 30, 2012. This increase in governmental activities accounted for 4.1% of the total
increase in net assets for the City, and represents a .21% increase in net assets for governmental activities.
Total expenses for governmental activities decreased by $998 thousand, or .74%, versus the prior year. This was
primarily due to reductions in staffing levels in Economic Development and Housing, Finance, Planning and
Development, and the Police and Fire Departments. Most operating expenditures remained status quo or were reduced
from the prior year’s budget.
Total program revenues for governmental activities decreased by $2.7 million, or 5.7%, versus the prior year. This
decrease was primarily due to a $1.3 million decrease in charges for services and a $1.9 million decrease in capital
grants and contributions, offset by a $460 thousand increase in operating grants and contributions. Revenues in most
programs, from most sources, have decreased.
Total general revenues for governmental activities decreased by $190 thousand, or .21%, primarily due to a $1.3
million, or 3.3%, decrease in property taxes, offset by an increase of $1.5 million, or 19.6%, in transfers from business-
type activities.
The cost of all governmental activities this year was $134.4 million. This reflects a $998 thousand, or .74%, decrease
from the fiscal 2011 total of $135.4 million. However, as shown on the Statement of Activities, the amount that the City’s
taxpayers ultimately financed for these activities totaled $88.8 million, because some of the cost was paid for by those
Attachment number 1 \nPage 19 of 184
Item # 2
8
who directly benefited from the programs ($36.2 million) or by other governments and organizations that subsidized
certain programs with grants and contributions ($9.4 million). This total of $88.8 million is $1.7 million greater than the
fiscal 2011 amount financed from general revenues.
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
Millions
Expenses and Program Revenues -Governmental Activities
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
Expenses Revenues
General
Government
Public
Safety
Physical
Environment
Transportation
Economic
Environment
Human
Services
Culture and
Recreation
Intereston
Long-term Debt
Charges for services
26.8%
Operating grants and
contributions
6.3%
Capital grants and
contributions
0.6%
Property taxes
28.1%
Sales taxes
10.4%
Utility taxes
9.4%
Communications
services taxes
4.3%
Other taxes
5.3%
Other revenues
8.8%
Revenues by Sources -Governmental Activities
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
Attachment number 1 \nPage 20 of 184
Item # 2
9
Business-type Activities
Net assets for business-type activities increased from $351.0 million for the prior year to $370.2 million. This increase
totaled $19.2 million, reflecting a 5.5% increase in business-type activities net assets. Net revenue from business-type
activities, before investment earnings and transfers, increased from $18.8 million for the prior year to $24.5 million for
fiscal 2012. This $5.7 million, or 30.5%, increase was primarily the result of a $678 thousand decrease in operating
expenses, along with a $2.2 million increase in capital grants and contributions and a $2.9 million increase in charges
for services. Most of this activity occurred in the Water & Sewer Utility, where net revenues increased $6.9 million in
this fund alone due to increased revenues and decreased expenses.
Total revenues for business-type activities increased by $5.2 million, or 3.4%, to $157.6 million versus the prior year
total of $152.4 million, primarily in the Water & Sewer Utility due to a 4.5% rate increase effective October 1, 2011, and
increased grant revenues received or receivable from the Southwest Florida Water Management District for reclaimed
water projects.
Total expenses for business-type activities decreased by $678 thousand, or .5%, from $130.2 million in fiscal 2011 to
$129.5 million for fiscal 2012. A significant portion of the $678 thousand decrease in expenses is attributable to the
Water & Sewer Utility. Water purchased for resale decreased $1.4 million due to reduced consumption and increased
production of City water and Interest Expense decreased $711 thousand due to refunding of the 2002 Water and Sewer
Revenue Bonds accomplished in fiscal 2011.
Finally, transfers for business-type activities changed from a net transfer out to governmental activities of $7.5 million in
fiscal 2011 to a net transfer out to governmental activities of $9.0 million in the current year. This net change of $1.5
million was primarily due to an increase in transfers from the Gas Utility Fund to the General Fund related to the
increased dividend to the General Fund on the fiscal 2011 gain in net assets.
$0
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
$40,000,000
$50,000,000
$60,000,000
$70,000,000
$80,000,000
Water and Sewer
Utility
Gas UtilitySolid Waste UtilityStormwater UtilityOther
Expenses and Program Revenue -Business-type Activities
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
Expenses
Revenues
Attachment number 1 \nPage 21 of 184
Item # 2
10
Financial Analysis of the City’s Funds
As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal
requirements.
Governmental Funds
The focus of the City’s governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of
spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City’s financing requirements. In particular,
unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government’s net resources available for spending at the
end of the fiscal year. The City reports the General Fund, Special Development Fund, and Capital Improvement Fund
as major governmental funds.
The City’s governmental funds for the year ended September 30, 2012, reflect a combined fund balance of $112.6
million versus $108.7 million for the prior year, an increase of $3.9 million. A total of $19.9 million, or 17.7%, represents
unassigned fund balance available for spending at the government’s discretion. The remainder of the fund balance is
classified as assigned ($9.5 million or 8.5%) to indicate that it is intended to be used for specific purposes supported by
management’s intent; committed ($17.3 million or 15.4%) to indicate that it can be used only for the specific purposes
determined by a formal vote of the City Council; restricted ($65.6 million or 58.3%) to indicate that it can be spent only
for the specific purposes stipulated by constitution, external resource providers, or through enabling legislation; or
nonspendable ($112 thousand or .1%) to indicate that it cannot be spent or is legally or contractually required to remain
intact.
The General Fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At September 30, 2012, unassigned fund balance of the
General Fund totaled $22.0 million, with the remaining $1.1 million in fund balance classified as nonspendable or
assigned. As a measure of the general fund’s liquidity it is useful to compare unassigned fund balance to total fund
expenditures. Unassigned fund balance represents 21.0% of total general fund expenditures (GAAP basis before
transfers) for the current fiscal year.
Charges for services
92.9%
Capital grants and
contributions
4.7%
Investment earnings
2.3%
Other
0.1%
Revenues by Source -Business-type Activities
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
Attachment number 1 \nPage 22 of 184
Item # 2
11
The fund balance of the Special Development Fund increased from $5.7 million to $8.4 million, for an increase of $2.7
million or 47.1%, during the current fiscal year versus a decrease of $782 thousand for fiscal 2011. The significant
increase for fiscal 2012 is primarily due to a reduction in the transfer of Penny for Pinellas revenues from the Special
Development Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund for initiation of new capital projects.
The fund balance for the Capital Improvement Fund increased from $43.0 million to $43.3 million during the current
fiscal year. This increase of $279 thousand is primarily the result of current year capital project funding received from
other funds ($16.5 million) and grant revenues received from federal, state, and local agencies ($371 thousand) in
excess of current year capital project expenditures ($15.8 million). This is typical volatility for the Capital Improvement
Fund due to timing differences between project funding and project spending.
The fund balances for Other (non-major) Governmental Funds increased from $36 thousand to $38 thousand during the
current fiscal year.
Proprietary Funds
The City’s proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government-wide financial statements,
but in more detail. The City reports the Water and Sewer Utility Fund, the Gas Utility Fund, the Solid Waste Utility Fund,
and the Stormwater Utility Fund as major funds.
The Water and Sewer Utility Fund realized a $8.7 million increase in net assets versus a $1.4 million increase for the
prior year. Operating revenues increased by $2.2 million, or 3.7%, while operating expenses decreased $1.2 million, or
2.4%. This resulted in a net increase in operating income of $3.4 million, from $7.7 million in fiscal 2011 to $11.1 million
in 2012. Additionally, capital grants and contributions increased by $3.0 million, or 81.0%; investment earnings
increased by $68 thousand, or 4.1%; and transfers out to other funds decreased by $62 thousand, or 2.0%. The
increase in operating revenues was the result of a 4.5% rate increase effective October 1, 2011. The decrease in
operating expenses was primarily the result of reductions in water purchased for resale due to reduced consumption
and increased production of City water, a decrease in Professional Fees and Repairs & Maintenance due to reduced
project activity, and a decrease in Interest Expense due to refunding of the 2002 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds
accomplished in fiscal 2011. The increase in capital grants and contributions was primarily the result of increased grant
revenues received or receivable from the Southwest Florida Water Management District for reclaimed water projects.
The Gas Utility Fund realized a $6.4 million increase in net assets versus a $6.9 million increase for the prior year.
Operating revenues decreased by $79,000, or .2%, from the prior year, primarily due to level fuel costs, while operating
expenses also decreased by $865 thousand (3.1%). The decrease in operating expenses was primarily due to an
decrease in gas purchased for resale in the amount of $1.4 million (9.9 %) offset by an increase of $202 thousand (4.4
%) in personal services; an increase of $176 thousand (74.9%) in operating materials and supplies; and an increase of
$149 thousand (9.4%) in depreciation expense. This resulted in a $786 thousand, or 9.0%, increase in operating
income from the prior year. Additionally, transfers out to other funds increased by $1.7 million, or 95.0% due to the
increased dividend to the General Fund on the fiscal 2011 gain in net assets.
The Solid Waste Utility Fund realized a $2.8 million increase in net assets versus a $3.1 million increase for the prior
year. Operating revenues increased by $267 thousand, or 1.4%, offset by an increase in operating expenses of $526
thousand, resulting in a $259 thousand decrease in operating income from $3.3 million in fiscal 2011 to $3.0 million in
fiscal 2012. The 1.4% increase in operating revenues was due to increased unbilled revenues coupled with a slight
increase in service level, as there were no rate increases approved for fiscal 2012.
The Stormwater Utility Fund realized an increase in net assets of $2.8 million versus a prior year increase of $3.8
million. Operating revenues increased by $659 thousand, or 4.3%, due to scheduled rate increases of 4.25% effective
October 1, 2011. Additionally fiscal 2012 realized a $723 thousand, or 7.0% increase in operating expenses, primarily
attributable to a 97.0% increase in repairs and maintenance due to the Stormpipe Improvement and Stevenson Creek
Estuary Restoration projects that were expensed as renewal and replacement, offset by a 58.9% decrease in
professional fees due to reduced project activity in fiscal 2012.
Unrestricted net assets and changes in net assets of the proprietary funds for fiscal years 2012 and 2011:
Attachment number 1 \nPage 23 of 184
Item # 2
12
Fund2012201120122011
Water and Sewer Utility52,455,090$ 46,633,516$ 8,659,108$ 1,435,607$
Gas Utility30,711,715 26,342,719 6,410,386 6,947,892
Solid Waste Utility25,211,308 22,328,536 2,812,541 3,099,936
Stormwater Utility26,930,359 23,679,353 2,765,426 3,760,362
Other funds13,475,524 12,528,360 192,404 152,297
Totals148,783,996$ 131,512,484$ 20,839,865$ 15,396,094$
Unrestricted Net AssetsChange in Net Assets
General Fund Budgetary Highlights
The final amended budget for General Fund expenditures reflected a net increase of $3.0 million, or 2.9%, from the
original budget. Key elements of this increase were as follows:
$100 thousand for the Economic Development Strategic Plan Matrix;
$108 thousand to fund the recommendations of the Business Task Force;
$342 thousand for retirement payouts and a union grievance;
$80 thousand for inventory purchases for resale at Pier 60;
$2.1 million increase in Police Department and Fire Department budgeted expenditures due to the accounting
for State tax contributions to the Police and Fire Supplemental Pension Plans, which are recorded as General
Fund revenues and employer contribution expenditures as recommended by the Governmental Finance
Officers Association;
$570 thousand to fund a 2.5% merit increase for CWA and SAMP employees; and
$251,000 decrease in Parks and Recreation salary and operating expenditures.
Final budgeted revenues reflect a net increase of $2.3 million, or 2.2%, from the original budget primarily due to the
following:
Mid-Year Budget Amendments included $16,483 in reimbursements supporting the Joint Terrorism Task Force,
Drug Enforcement Agency and informant payments; an increase of $115,000 in fire protection and EMS revenues;
an increase of $60,000 in Fire Inspection Fees; an increase of $80 thousand in Pier 60 revenues representing
fishing admissions, general admissions, concession sales and concession souvenirs; $1,300 representing
donations received from Volunteer Florida (AmeriCorps) and the Barsema Family Foundation.
Third Quarter Budget Amendments included a net decrease of $515 thousand in property tax revenues, franchise
fees, utility taxes, licenses and permits, sales tax, communication tax, state revenue sharing, various Parks and
Recreation fees, various Pier 60 revenues and other general revenue to bring the budget in line with actual and
anticipated receipts for the remainder of the fiscal year; $13,734 in reimbursements supporting the Joint Terrorism
Task Force, Drug Enforcement Agency and informant payments; $32,000 in FDOT reimbursements; $2.1 million
from state sources to reflect insurance monies received on behalf of the City’s police and fire supplemental pension
plans; an increase of $7,130 from the Pinellas Library Co-op; an increase of $45,000 in traffic signal
reimbursements; an increase of $408,500 in code enforcement fines from Flag Scientology building; a decrease of
$300 thousand in interest income due to lower than expected interest rates; a $200 donation received by the Police
Department in appreciation of the Honor Guard; $1,275 from the Florida Bar Association to fund an intern; and $187
thousand representing increased revenues in Pier 60 rental income.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 24 of 184
Item # 2
13
Final budgeted “transfers in” from other funds reflect a $2.4 million, or 29.7%, increase from the original budget primarily
due to:
$1.8 million from the Gas Fund representing an increase in the computed annual gas dividend payment to the
General Fund for fiscal 2012;
$593 thousand from the Capital Improvement Fund due to completion of the Beach Recreation Center Boat
Ramp Replacement project;
$25,637 from the Capital Improvement Fund due to completion of the Carpenter Complex Clubhouse project;
and
$3,968 from the Special Programs fund due to closure of the City Manager Flexibility Fund.
Final budgeted “transfers out” reflect a $5.3 million, or 130.0%, increase from the original budget primarily due to:
$3.2 million transferred to the Capital Improvement Fund for Carpenter Complex/Bright House Field
Improvements;
$200,000 transferred to the Capital Improvement Fund for Airpark Runway/Taxiway Extension and
Rehabilitation;
$200,000 transferred to the Capital Improvement Fund for Gas Main Extensions;
$200,000 transferred to the Capital Improvement Fund for the Natural Gas Vehicle project;
$1.1 million transferred to the Special Programs Fund for Police and Fire Department overtime at the
Republican National Convention;
$130,000 transferred to the Capital Improvement Fund for Main Library Entryway Improvements;
$20,000 transferred to the Capital Improvement Fund for Brighthouse Field Infrastructure
Repairs/Improvements;
$20,525 transferred to the Capital Improvement Fund for FDOT Median and ROW Enhancements;
$110 thousand transferred to the Capital Improvement Fund for restrooms on Clearwater Beach; and
$100 thousand transferred to the Capital Improvement Fund for North Greenwood Athletic Fields.
Total actual revenues for the General Fund for fiscal 2012 were $.6 million, or .59%, less than final budgeted revenues.
Contributing to this deficit of actual revenues versus final budgeted revenues was a deficit of $414 thousand (.73%) in
tax revenue; a deficit of $156 thousand (.81%) in intergovernmental revenue; a surplus of $299 thousand (2.29%) in
charges for services; a deficit of $459 thousand (45.8%) in fines and forfeitures; and a surplus of $137 thousand
(15.1%) in miscellaneous revenues.
Fiscal 2012 actual expenditures for the General Fund were less than final budgeted expenditures by $2.5 million, or
2.3%, primarily due to budget savings across all City departments for fiscal 2012.
Capital Asset and Debt Administration
Capital Assets
Capital assets include land, buildings and building improvements, improvements other than buildings, machinery and
equipment, and infrastructure. The infrastructure asset category includes long-lived capital assets, typically stationary in
nature, such as roads, sidewalks, and bridges. At September 30, 2012, the City had investments in capital assets
totaling $660,979,415 (net of accumulated depreciation).
Attachment number 1 \nPage 25 of 184
Item # 2
14
201220112012201120122011
Land80,627$ 79,114$ 31,368$ 31,281$ 111,995$ 110,395$
Buildings87,899 89,726 11,802 12,267 99,701 101,993
Improvements other than buildings15,740 16,614 323,084 320,856 338,824 337,470
Machinery and equipment17,048 18,238 2,323 2,619 19,371 20,857
Infrastructure67,492 68,279 - - 67,492 68,279
Construction in progress5,133 5,189 18,463 12,201 23,596 17,390
Total273,939$ 277,160$ 387,040$ 379,224$ 660,979$ 656,384$
* Net of accumulated depreciation
Governmental ActivitiesTotalBusiness-type Activities
City of Clearwater, Florida - Capital Assets*
(amounts in thousands)
Net capital assets for the City’s governmental activities decreased from $277.1 million to $273.9 million, reflecting a
decrease of $3.2 million for the current fiscal year. Capital asset additions of $12.8 were offset by depreciation expense
of $15.8 million and net capital asset retirements totaling approximately $200 thousand. Major fiscal 2012 completed
governmental capital projects included $733 thousand for the Gulf to Bay/Highland Gateway, $2.5 million for Phase II of
the Downtown Streetscape, $1.9 million for acquisition of the St. Pete Times property, $435 thousand for restrooms on
Clearwater Beach, $671 thousand for North Greenwood Recreation Center renovations, and $191 thousand for
acquisition of property for the expansion of Capitol Theatre.
Net capital assets for the City’s business-type activities increased from $379.2 million to $387.0 million, reflecting an
increase of $7.8 million for the current fiscal year. Capital asset additions of $26.3 million were offset by depreciation
expense of $18.5 million and net capital asset retirements totaling approximately $17 thousand. Major fiscal 2012
business-type capital asset transactions included $2.3 million for reclaimed water projects and $1.4 million for
wastewater treatment plant screw pump replacements.
Additional information on the City’s capital assets can be found in Note III (C) on the notes to the financial statements.
Long-term debt
The City’s total long-term debt decreased from $277.8 million to $272.6 million, a decrease of $5.2 million or 1.9%.
Long-term debt for governmental activities increased by $1.7 million, or 4.2%, while long-term debt for business-type
activities decreased by $6.9 million or 2.9%. Key factors contributing to these decreases included:
The increase in long-term debt for governmental activities is primarily due to increases in accruals for lease
purchase contracts, compensated absences, other post-employment benefits and claims payable, offset by
principal payment on the Spring Training Facility Revenue Bonds.
The decrease in long-term debt for business-type activities is primarily due to approximately $7.1 million of
scheduled principal payments and a $930 thousand reduction in principal payments achieved by issuing the
2012 Stormwater System Revenue Refunding Bonds to redeem the 2002 Stormwater Revenue Bond, offset by
increased accruals for lease purchase contracts and compensated absences, and a decrease in other post-
employment benefits.
The City’s bonded debt as of September 30, 2012, consists entirely of revenue bonds (secured solely by specified
revenue sources) with no general obligation debt or special assessment debt outstanding. Governmental activities net
revenue bonds totaled $10.1 million while business-type activities totaled $226.7 million.
The City’s Charter limits indebtedness to 20% of the assessed valuation of non-exempt real estate. The current debt
limitation is approximately $1.9 billion, which is significantly in excess of the City’s applicable indebtedness of
approximately $224 million at September 30, 2012.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 26 of 184
Item # 2
15
Additional information on the City’s long-term debt can be found in Note III (F) of the notes to the financial statements.
Economic Factors and Year 2013 Budgets and Rates
Factors considered in preparing the City of Clearwater’s budget for fiscal year 2013 included:
A 1% decline in property values, reflecting a 33% decline from the point at which City property values peaked
five years ago.
The unemployment rate for the Tampa Bay metropolitan area for September 2012 was 8.7%, a decrease from
the September 2011 rate of 10.8%. The unemployment rate for Pinellas County was also a decrease – from
10.3% for September 2011 to 8.4% for September 2012. The unemployment rate for Florida similarly
decreased – from 10.6% for September 2011 to 8.7% for September 2012. The national rate also reflected a
slight decrease – from 9.1% for September 2011 to 7.8% for September 2012.
Total taxable assessed values for the City of Clearwater decreased approximately 1% for fiscal 2013. The City’s
millage rate was unchanged from the fiscal 2012 rate of 5.1550 mills, reflecting a 1.6% decrease from the fiscal
2013 rolled-back rate of 5.2387 mills.
An increase of 3.8 full-time equivalent positions City-wide, primarily in the utility operations of Gas and
Stormwater, to a total of 1,685.3. The City has reduced City-wide full-time equivalent positions by 14% and
General Fund full-time equivalent positions by 21% over the past five years.
An increase of $2 million in the actuarially required contribution to the Employees’ Pension Plan, from $18.9
million, or 24.69% of covered payroll, for fiscal 2012 to $20.9 million, or 27.97% of covered payroll, for fiscal
2013. The 13.3% increase in the pension contribution rate is partially offset by the use of $625 thousand of the
credit balance, which is estimated at $6.6 million.
An increase in employee medical insurance costs of $62,000, or less than 1%, from fiscal 2012.
Budgeted Water and Sewer utility revenues for 2013 reflect a 4.5% rate increase effective October 1, 2012,
while fiscal 2013 budgeted Stormwater utility revenues reflect a 2.75% rate increase effective October 1, 2012.
Contacting the City’s Financial Management
This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the City’s finances for all those with an interest in our
government and to show the City’s accountability for the money it receives. Questions concerning any of the information
provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to: City of Clearwater,
Finance Department, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 27 of 184
Item # 2
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
16
Attachment number 1 \nPage 28 of 184
Item # 2
Basic Financial Statements
17
Attachment number 1 \nPage 29 of 184
Item # 2
GovernmentalBusiness-type
Activities ActivitiesTotal
ASSETS
Cash and investments$139,258,850 $129,534,090 $268,792,940
Receivables (net)20,080,041 14,467,828 34,547,869
Internal balances(2,827,863) 2,827,863 -
Due from other governments6,695,901 8,506,503 15,202,404
Prepaid items2,200,674 66,848 2,267,522
Inventories531,602 1,843,840 2,375,442
Restricted assets:
Cash and investments- 67,737,632 67,737,632
Due from other governments- 655,821 655,821
Deferred charges76,353 2,109,116 2,185,469
Net pension asset4,939,315 1,628,841 6,568,156
Capital assets:
Land80,627,282 31,367,558 111,994,840
Buildings87,899,148 11,801,853 99,701,001
Improvements other than buildings15,740,506 323,084,413 338,824,919
Machinery and equipment17,047,706 2,322,885 19,370,591
Infrastructure67,492,093 - 67,492,093
Construction in progress5,132,532 18,463,439 23,595,971
Total assets444,894,140 616,418,530 1,061,312,670
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and other current liabilities5,119,729 4,538,591 9,658,320
Accrued liabilities1,215,942 365,001 1,580,943
Accruedinterestpayable 41334 16281 57615
Primary Government
City of Clearwater, Florida
Statement of Net Assets
September 30, 2012
Accrued interest payable 41,334 16,281 57,615
Due to other governments283,676 - 283,676
Deposits2,400 66,364 68,764
Unearned revenue and liens653,751 19,879 673,630
Payable from restricted assets:
Construction contracts payable- 553,401 553,401
Accrued interest payable- 3,465,826 3,465,826
Customers deposits- 6,587,104 6,587,104
Non-current liabilities due within one year:
Compensated absences4,599,785 1,089,451 5,689,236
Capital lease purchases payable2,813,490 253,599 3,067,089
Revenue bonds payable590,000 7,390,000 7,980,000
Claims payable2,439,700 - 2,439,700
Long-term debt and liabilities:
Unearned revenue- 187,113 187,113
Compensated absences2,889,393 684,349 3,573,742
Other postemployment benefits5,753,692 2,324,954 8,078,646
Capital lease purchases payable6,244,778 511,846 6,756,624
Revenue bonds payable9,710,258 218,151,612 227,861,870
Claims payable6,983,300 - 6,983,300
Total liabilities49,341,228 246,205,371 295,546,599
NET ASSETS
Invested in capital assets, net of related debt254,580,741 163,315,616 417,896,357
Restricted for:
Capital projects37,648,165 9,300,000 46,948,165
Debt service521,396 21,708,928 22,230,324
Renewal and replacement- 16,549,765 16,549,765
Grant programs22,594,832 - 22,594,832
Impact fees- 7,645,906 7,645,906
Unrestricted80,207,778 151,692,944 231,900,722
Total net assets$395,552,912 $370,213,159 $765,766,071
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
18
Attachment number 1 \nPage 30 of 184
Item # 2
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
f
o
r
G
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
&
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
‐
T
y
p
e
Fu
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
/
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
C
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
C
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
A
c
t
iv
i
t
i
e
s
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
T
o
t
a
l
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
go
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
:
Go
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
1
4
,
2
2
9
,
7
6
8
$
20
,
4
0
1
,
0
8
4
$
1
6
,
9
9
8
$
‐
$
6
,
18
8
,
3
1
4
$
‐
$ 6,188,314$
Pu
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
6
7
,
5
5
9
,
3
0
3
9
,
2
6
5
,
1
0
1
4
,
4
8
7
,
8
1
7
‐
(
53
,
8
0
6
,
3
8
5
)
‐
(
53,806,385)
Ph
y
s
i
c
a
l
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
3
,
1
8
9
,
0
9
6
7
6
,
8
2
3
1
3
4
,
1
9
3
1
1
5
,
6
8
9
(
2
,
8
6
2
,
3
9
1
)
‐
(
2
,
862,391)
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
1
3
,
4
3
1
,
6
9
5
8
8
5
,
0
3
0
2
1
8
,
0
4
2
3
3
2
,
6
1
6
(
1
1
,
9
9
6
,
0
0
7
)
‐
(
11,996,007)
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
2
,
2
4
0
,
6
3
7
1
2
1
,
6
8
7
1
,
5
6
5
,
4
9
6
‐
(
55
3
,
4
5
4
)
‐
(
553,454)
Hu
m
a
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
1
8
5
,
9
6
6
‐
18
0
,
2
3
1
‐
(
5
,7
3
5
)
‐
(
5
,735)
Cu
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
3
2
,
8
1
4
,
0
3
0
5
,
4
7
3
,
6
4
3
1
,
9
1
8
,
7
0
6
3
9
6
,
7
7
8
(
2
5
,
0
2
4,
9
0
3
)
‐
(
25,024,903)
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
o
n
l
o
n
g
‐
t
e
r
m
d
e
b
t
7
0
8
,
9
7
8
‐
‐
‐
(
70
8
,
9
7
8
)
‐
(
708,978)
To
t
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
1
3
4
,
3
5
9
,
4
7
3
36
,
2
2
3
,
3
6
8
8
,
52
1
,
4
8
3
84
5
,
0
8
3
(
88
,
7
6
9
,
5
3
9
)
‐
(
88,769,539)
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
‐
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Wa
t
e
r
&
S
e
w
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
5
9
,
4
0
5
,
8
1
5
62
,
0
1
1
,
9
7
7
‐
6
,
80
0
,
4
1
7
‐
9
,
406,579
9
,
406,579
Ga
s
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
2
7
,
6
6
1
,
7
2
1
36
,
3
5
0
,
8
2
5
‐
‐
‐
8
,
689,104
8
,
689,104
So
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
1
6
,
6
3
2
,
3
7
4
19
,
4
6
2
,
4
2
1
‐
‐
‐
2
,
830,047
2
,
830,047
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
1
2
,
8
4
6
,
5
9
0
15
,
8
8
9
,
5
9
8
‐
7
1
,
9
5
0
‐
3
,
114,958
3
,
114,958
Re
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
2
,
8
5
5
,
4
4
4
2
,
68
0
,
8
4
8
8
3
,
3
5
5
‐
‐
(
91,241)
(
91,241)
Ma
r
i
n
e
4
1
6
8
2
0
5
4
1
8
0
6
2
4
‐
77
7
7
8
‐
9019790197
N
e
t
(
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
)
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
a
n
d
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
N
e
t
A
s
s
e
t
s
Ci
t
y
of
Cl
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
,
Fl
o
r
i
d
a
St
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
of
Ac
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
Fo
r
th
e
Ye
a
r
En
d
e
d
Se
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
30
,
20
1
2
19
Ma
r
i
n
e
4,16
8
,20
5
4,18
0
,62
4
‐
77
,77
8
‐
90,197
90,197
Av
i
a
t
i
o
n
3
6
5
,
9
5
8
25
6
,
6
5
5
‐
51
9
,
0
6
7
‐
409,764
409,764
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
S
y
s
t
e
m
4
,
2
0
0
,
0
4
1
4
,
89
0
,
3
6
9
‐
‐
‐
690,328
690,328
Ha
r
b
o
r
v
i
e
w
C
e
n
t
e
r
6
1
0
,
0
0
0
20
8
,
6
0
5
‐
‐
‐
(
401,395)
(
401,395)
Cl
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
H
a
r
b
o
r
M
a
r
i
n
a
7
2
5
,
7
8
1
46
7
,
0
8
7
5
1
,
0
2
9
‐
‐
(
207,665)
(
207,665)
To
t
a
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
‐
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
1
2
9
,
4
7
1
,
9
2
9
14
6
,
3
9
9
,
0
0
9
13
4
,
3
8
4
7
,
46
9
,
2
1
2
‐
24,530,676
24,530,676
To
t
a
l
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
26
3
,
8
3
1
,
4
0
2
$
18
2
,
6
2
2
,
3
7
7
$
8
,
6
5
5
,
8
6
7
$
8
,
31
4
,
2
9
5
$
(
88
,
7
6
9
,
5
3
9
)
2
4
,
530,676
(
64,238,863)
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
:
T
a
x
e
s
:
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
a
xe
s
3
7
,
9
3
8
,
1
2
2
‐
37,938,122
S
a
l
e
s
t
a
x
es
1
4
,
0
9
2
,
3
3
0
‐
14,092,330
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
t
ax
e
s
1
2
,
7
3
5
,
3
1
2
‐
12,735,312
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
s
e
rv
i
c
e
s
t
a
x
e
s
5
,
8
7
0
,
7
7
7
‐
5
,
870,777
O
t
h
e
r
t
a
x
es
7
,
1
0
4
,
7
8
0
‐
7
,
104,780
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
e
a
rn
i
n
g
s
2
,
7
5
8
,
2
4
1
3
,
644,389
6
,
402,630
M
i
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
ou
s
1
0
0
,
9
4
9
‐
100,949
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
8
,
9
8
0
,
2
7
9
(
8
,
9
8
0
,
2
7
9
)
‐
T
o
t
a
l
g
en
e
r
a
l
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
8
9
,
5
8
0
,
7
9
0
(
5
,
335,890)
84,244,900
C
h
a
n
g
e
i
n
n
e
t
a
s
s
e
t
s
8
1
1
,
2
5
1
19,194,786
20,006,037
Ne
t
a
s
s
e
t
s
‐
‐
b
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
3
9
4
,
7
4
1
,
6
6
1
351,018,373
745,760,034
Ne
t
a
s
s
e
t
s
‐
‐
e
n
d
i
n
g
3
9
5
,
5
5
2
,
9
1
2
$
3
7
0
,
213,159$ 765,766,071$
Th
e
n
o
t
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
a
n
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
l
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
hi
s
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
.
19
Attachment number 1 \nPage 31 of 184
Item # 2
SpecialCapitalOtherTotals
GeneralDevelopmentImprovementGovernmentalGovernmental
FundFundFundFundsFunds
ASSETS
Cash and investments $20,447,623 $6,811,985 $47,665,335 $15,441,852$90,366,795
Receivables (net where applicable, of allowances
for estimated uncollectible amounts):
Accrued interest 150,397 177,718 2,066 84,371414,552
Accounts and contracts 180,899 - - - 180,899
Mortgages, notes and other loans - - - 17,011,89917,011,899
Rehabilitation advances - - - 9,4019,401
Property taxes 193,286 11,444 - - 204,730
Utility taxes 959,958 - - - 959,958
Franchise fees 936,419 - - - 936,419
Other - - - 78,30178,301
Due from other funds (deficit in pooled cash)- - 87,329 - 87,329
Due from other governmental entities - grants - - - 2,536,211 2,536,211
Due from other governmental entities - other 2,401,885 1,606,031 - 151,774 4,159,690
Land held for resale - - - 4,839,411 4,839,411
Inventories, at cost 25,005 - - - 25,005
Prepaid items - - - 87,329 87,329
Advances to other funds - - - 974,267 974,267
Total assets $25,295,472$8,607,178$47,754,730$41,214,816$122,872,196
LIABILITIES
Accounts and contracts payable $640,542 $- $916,877$132,451$1,689,870
Accrued payroll 1,050,576 - - 28,1811,078,757
Due to other funds - - - 316,667 316,667
Due to other funds (deficit in pooled cash)- - - 87,32987,329
Due to other governmental entities 44,600 190,999 - 48,077283,676
Deposits 2,400 - - - 2,400
Construction escrows - - - 261,862261,862
Deferred revenue 455,768 11,444 - 15,696482,908
Advances from other funds - - 3,562,209 2,557,6006,119,809
Total liabilities 2,193,886202,4434,479,0863,447,863 10,323,278
FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable inventories and prepaid items 25,005 - - 87,329 112,334
Restricted - 3,185,266 29,876,952 32,582,920 65,645,138
Committed - 199,345 13,347,190 3,799,697 17,346,232
Assigned 1,042,958 5,020,124 51,502 3,415,641 9,530,225
Unassigned 22,033,623 - - (2,118,634) 19,914,989
Total fund balances 23,101,586 8,404,735 43,275,644 37,766,953 112,548,918
Total liabilities and fund balances $25,295,472 $8,607,178 $47,754,730 $41,214,816 $122,872,196
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Balance Sheet
Governmental Funds
September 30, 2012
20
Attachment number 1 \nPage 32 of 184
Item # 2
Total fund balances of governmental funds 112,548,918$
Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources, therefore,
are not reported in the funds. The cost of the assets totals $468,942,126 and the
accumulated depreciation totals $195,002,859
Total capital assets for governmental activities273,939,267$
Less: Land included in governmental funds as "Land Held for Resale"(4,839,411)
269,099,856
The net pension asset related to governmental activities does not represent financial
resources and is not reported in the funds.4,939,315
Accrued general long-term debt interest expenses are not financial uses and, therefore,
are not reported in the funds.(41,334)
Accrued property taxes are not financial resources in the current period and, therefore,
are reported as deferred revenues in the funds.204,730
Accrued liens are not financial resources in the current period and, therefore,
are reported as deferred revenues in the funds.179,482
Accrued permit fees are not financial resources in the current period and, therefore,
are reported as deferred revenues in the funds.83,000
The assets and liabilities of the internal service funds (funds used to charge the costs of certain activities
to individual funds) are included in the governmental activities in the statement of net assets.
Net assets of internal service funds 51,470,026
Less: Capital assets included in total governmental capital assets above(16,469,078)
Less: Net pension asset included in total governmental net pension asset above (382,603)
Add: Capital lease purchases payable included in total governmental below 7,679,502
Add: Compensated absences included in total governmental below 924,259
Add: Other post-employment benefits included in total governmental below750,830
Less: Adjustment to reflect the consolidation of internal service fund activities
related to enterprise funds (2,908,948)
41,063,988
Long-term liabilities, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the current
period and accordingly are not reported in the funds.
Long-term liabilities at year-end consist of:
Bonds payable (10,090,000)
Less: Deferred charge for issuance costs (to be amortized over life of debt)76,353
Add: Issuance premium (to be amortized as a reduction of interest expense)(210,258)
Capital lease purchases payable (9,058,268)
Other post-employment benefits (5,753,692)
Compensated absences (7,489,178)
(32,525,043)
Total net assets of governmental activities 395,552,912$
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds
to the Statement of Net Assets
September 30, 2012
21
Attachment number 1 \nPage 33 of 184
Item # 2
SpecialCapitalOtherTotal
GeneralDevelopmentImprovementGovernmentalGovernmental
FundFundFundFundsFunds
REVENUES
Taxes:
Property$36,145,961 $1,808,255 $- $- $37,954,216
Sales - 8,393,331 - - 8,393,331
Utility12,735,312 - - - 12,735,312
Communications services5,870,777 - - - 5,870,777
Other taxes1,914,425 1,393,638 - - 3,308,063
Total taxes56,666,475 11,595,224 - - 68,261,699
Franchise fees9,602,488 - - - 9,602,488
Licenses, permits, and fees1,786,292 331,122 - - 2,117,414
Intergovernmental:
Federal- - 370,000 3,951,721 4,321,721
State11,276,354 - 896 672,029 11,949,279
Local7,849,456 - - 1,629,024 9,478,480
Total intergovernmental19,125,810 - 370,896 6,252,774 25,749,480
Charges for services13,361,986 - - 1,320,212 14,682,198
Fines and forfeitures543,262 - - 441,366 984,628
Investment earnings599,609 782,965 8,070 328,578 1,719,222
Miscellaneous1,040,972 - 134,182 840,508 2,015,662
Total revenues102,726,894 12,709,311 513,148 9,183,438 125,132,791
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government11,491,688 - 758,385 514,314 12,764,387
Public safety61,003,424 - 682,780 2,484,435 64,170,639
Physical environment2,842,492 - 43,485 145,811 3,031,788
Transportation5,772,734 - 2,549,975 9,142 8,331,851
Economic environment1,105,014 - - 1,365,016 2,470,030
Human services- - - 181,989 181,989
Culture and recreation22,806,376 - 3,223,115 998,221 27,027,712
Debt service:
Principal- - - 1,048,769 1,048,769
Interest & fiscal charges- - - 548,088 548,088
Capital outlay- - 8,563,739 296,501 8,860,240
Total expenditures105,021,728 - 15,821,479 7,592,286 128,435,493
Excess (deficiency) of revenues
over / (under) expenditures(2,294,834) 12,709,311 (15,308,331) 1,591,152 (3,302,702)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers in10,657,902 - 16,530,420 4,185,059 31,373,381
Transfers out(9,222,538) (10,019,519) (1,256,858) (3,992,349) (24,491,264)
Other long term debt issued- - 313,804 - 313,804
Total other financing sources (uses)1,435,364 (10,019,519) 15,587,366 192,710 7,195,921
Net change in fund balances(859,470) 2,689,792 279,035 1,783,862 3,893,219
Fund balances - beginning23,961,056 5,714,943 42,996,609 35,983,091 108,655,699
Fund balances - ending$23,101,586 $8,404,735 $43,275,644 $37,766,953 $112,548,918
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances
Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
22
Attachment number 1 \nPage 34 of 184
Item # 2
Net change in fund balances ‐ total governmental funds 3,893,219$
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because:
Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures while governmental activities report
depreciation expense to allocate those costs over the life of the assets. This is the amount by
which capital outlays exceeded depreciation in the current period.
Expenditures for capital assets 8,329,540$
Less current year depreciation (10,986,282)
(2,656,742)
In the Statement of Activities, capital assets donated from enterprise funds are reported as transfers
in from governmental funds. Governmental funds do not report capital assets.8,951
In the Statement of Activities, capital assets donated from the general government to internal service
funds are reported as transfers. Governmental funds do not report capital assets.(1,805,153)
In the Statement of Activities the loss on disposition of capital assets is reported. The loss is not
a use of current resources and thus is not reported in the funds.(128,254)
Loan proceeds provide current financial resources to governmental funds; however issuing debt
increases long‐term liabilities in the Statement of Net Assets. In the current year these amounts are:
Capital lease proceeds (313,804)
Repayment of long term debt principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds, however the
repayment reduces long‐term liabilities in the Statement of Net Assets. Current year amounts are:
Revenue bond principal payments 570,000
Capital lease principal payments 478,769
1,048,769
Net pension asset is not a current financial resources and consequently is not reported in the
funds. However it is an asset in the Statement of Net Assets.
Current year change in the net pension asset (366,035)
Liability for other post‐employment benefits (OPEB) does not require the use of current financial resources
and consequently is not reported in the funds. However it is a liability in the Statement of Net Assets.
Current year change in the liability for other post‐employment benefits (908,553)
Some expenses reported in the Statement of Activities do not require the use of current financial
resources and therefore are not reported as expenditures in the governmental funds:
Current year change in compensated absences (185,629)
Amortization of issuance costs (10,511)
Amortization of bond discounts and premiums 25,858
Current year change in accrued interest expense 1,663
(168,619)
Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current financial resources are not
reported as revenues in the funds:
Current year change in property taxes receivable (16,094)
Current year change in liens receivable (9,127)
Current year change in permit fees receivable 21,400
The net revenues of internal service funds (funds used to charge the costs of certain activities
to individual funds) for governmental activities are reported in the Statement of Activities but not
in the governmental funds.2,211,293
Total change in net assets of governmental activities 811,251$
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and
Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
to the Statement of Activities
23
Attachment number 1 \nPage 35 of 184
Item # 2
Variance with
ActualFinal Budget
OriginalFinalAmountsPositive (Negative)
Taxes:
Property $35,888,190 $36,095,160 $36,145,961 $50,801
Utility taxes13,290,250 12,835,250 12,735,312 (99,938)
Communications services6,150,000 5,990,000 5,870,777 (119,223)
Other taxes2,160,000 2,160,000 1,914,425 (245,575)
Total taxes57,488,440 57,080,410 56,666,475 (413,935)
Franchise fees10,560,000 9,670,000 9,602,488 (67,512)
Licenses, permits, and fees1,490,000 1,735,000 1,786,292 51,292
Intergovernmental:
State8,842,020 11,433,284 11,276,354 (156,930)
Local7,681,100 7,848,230 7,849,456 1,226
Total intergovernmental16,523,120 19,281,514 19,125,810 (155,704)
Charges for services12,831,910 13,063,410 13,361,986 298,576
Fines and forfeitures594,000 1,002,500 543,262 (459,238)
Investment earnings 895,000 595,000 599,609 4,609
Miscellaneous 679,590 904,365 1,040,972 136,607
Total revenues101,062,060 103,332,199 102,726,894 (605,305)
EXPENDITURES
General government
City Council258,050 270,830 257,343 13,487
City Manager's Office1,190,800 1,201,300 1,182,912 18,388
City Attorney's Office1,514,610 1,558,335 1,534,083 24,252
Official Records & Legislative Services1,018,520 985,710 911,770 73,940
Public Communications885,430 894,440 866,512 27,928
Finance2,130,100 2,165,530 2,067,599 97,931
Human Resources1,030,420 1,065,270 989,991 75,279
Non-Departmental1,981,870 1,981,870 1,974,420 7,450
Engineering53,719 54,250 52,623 1,627
Parks and Recreation13,254 12,680 9,850 2,830
Planning1,260,140 1,288,630 1,271,512 17,118
City Auditor's Office190,340 192,610 188,531 4,079
Office of Management & Budget293,740 297,770 295,146 2,624
Total general government11,820,993 11,969,225 11,602,292 366,933
Public safety
Police35,063,040 36,135,894 35,177,556 958,338
Fire21,076,890 22,570,020 22,474,814 95,206
Development & Neighborhood Services3,225,210 3,358,960 3,139,558 219,402
Total public safety59,365,140 62,064,874 60,791,928 1,272,946
Physical environment
Engineering2,444,224 2,468,393 2,394,345 74,048
Parks and Recreation 603,057 576,942 448,180 128,762
Total physical environment3,047,281 3,045,335 2,842,525 202,810
Transportation
Engineering4,433,207 4,467,326 4,366,510 100,816
Parks and Recreation1,693,819 1,616,900 1,415,091 201,809
Total transportation6,127,026 6,084,226 5,781,601 302,625
Economic environment
Economic Development1,199,880 1,307,683 1,114,753 192,930
Total economic environment1,199,880 1,307,683 1,114,753 192,930
Culture and recreation
Parks and Recreation17,718,670 17,652,184 17,611,435 40,749
Library4,935,830 5,002,070 4,849,623 152,447
Marine 530,530 614,600 614,978 (378)
Total culture and recreation23,185,030 23,268,854 23,076,036 192,818
Total expenditures (budgetary basis)104,745,350 107,740,197 105,209,135 2,531,062
Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (budgetary basis)(3,683,290) (4,407,998) (2,482,241) 1,925,757
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers in8,049,010 10,437,701 10,657,902 220,201
Transfers out(4,073,890) (9,357,915) (9,222,538) 135,377
Total other financing sources (uses) (budgetary basis)3,975,120 1,079,786 1,435,364 355,578
Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources
over expenditures and other financing uses (budgetary basis)
Encumbered purchase orders, beginning of year- - (855,551) (855,551)
Encumbered purchase orders, end of year- - 1,042,958 1,042,958
Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources
over expenditures and other financing uses (GAAP basis)
Fund balances - beginning23,961,056 23,961,056 23,961,056 -
Fund balances - ending$24,252,886 $20,632,844 $23,101,586 $2,468,742
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
REVENUES
291,830 (3,328,212) (859,470) 2,468,742
291,830 (3,328,212) (1,046,877) 2,281,335
Budgeted Amounts
City of Clearwater, Florida
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances -
Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis)
General Fund
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
24
Attachment number 1 \nPage 36 of 184
Item # 2
Variance with
Final Budget
ActualPositive
OriginalFinalAmounts(Negative)
REVENUES
Taxes:
Property$1,802,780 $1,802,780 $1,808,255 $5,475
Sales 8,137,000 8,137,000 8,393,331 256,331
Other taxes1,400,000 1,400,000 1,393,638 (6,362)
Total taxes11,339,780 11,339,780 11,595,224 255,444
Licenses, permits, and fees195,000 313,900 331,122 17,222
Investment earnings35,000 535,000 782,965 247,965
Total revenues11,569,780 12,188,680 12,709,311 520,631
EXPENDITURES
Total expenditures- - - -
Excess of revenues over expenditures11,569,780 12,188,680 12,709,311 520,631
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers out(9,921,960) (10,019,519) (10,019,519) -
Total other financing sources (uses)(9,921,960) (10,019,519) (10,019,519) -
Excess / (Deficiency) of revenues and other
sources over expenditures and other uses1,647,820 2,169,161 2,689,792 520,631
Fund balances - beginning5,714,943 5,714,943 5,714,943 -
Fund balances - ending$7,362,763 $7,884,104 $8,404,735 $520,631
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
Budgeted Amounts
City of Clearwater, Florida
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances -
Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis)
Special Development Fund
25
Attachment number 1 \nPage 37 of 184
Item # 2
Water
and SewerGasSolid Waste
UtilityUtilityUtility
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and investments$42,081,467 $28,185,051 $24,101,823
Accrued interest receivable429,457 129,143 105,283
Accounts and contracts receivable:
Billed3,661,157 1,302,372 1,085,386
Unbilled charges estimated2,385,300 1,477,400 759,747
6,046,457 2,779,772 1,845,133
Less: Allowance for uncollectable accounts(124,895) (54,806) (34,180)
Total receivables, net5,921,562 2,724,966 1,810,953
Other receivables- 457,802 -
Due from other funds- - -
Due from other governmental entities4,941,623 - -
Inventories, at cost664,531 1,107,080 -
Prepaid expenses and other assets14,399 - 16,113
Total current assets - unrestricted54,053,039 32,604,042 26,034,172
Current assets - restricted:
Restricted cash and investments10,042,143 2,874,463 1,058,368
Business-type
Enterprise
City of Clearwater, Florida
Statement of Net Assets
Proprietary Funds
September 30, 2012
Due from other governmental entities655,821 - -
Total current assets - restricted10,697,964 2,874,463 1,058,368
Total current assets64,751,003 35,478,505 27,092,540
Noncurrent assets:
Restricted:
Restricted cash and investments39,960,948 300,000 -
Deferred charges1,500,904 217,866 -
Other receivables187,113 - -
Advance to other funds- - -
Net pension asset672,209 362,950 373,377
Capital assets:
Land and other nondepreciable assets19,346,149 336,684 1,041,913
Capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation221,645,124 45,517,680 1,747,585
Total noncurrent assets283,312,447 46,735,180 3,162,875
Total assets348,063,450 82,213,685 30,255,415
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
26
Attachment number 1 \nPage 38 of 184
Item # 2
Governmental
Activities -
StormwaterOtherInternal Service
UtilityFundsTotalFunds
$21,373,273 $13,792,476 $129,534,090 $48,892,055
102,561 95,993 862,437 237,407
931,622 108,056 7,088,593 -
1,316,200 180,193 6,118,840 -
2,247,822 288,249 13,207,433 -
(29,965) (3,111) (246,957) -
2,217,857 285,138 12,960,476 - -
- - 457,802 46,475
- - - 428,592
3,514,239 50,641 8,506,503 -
14,948 57,281 1,843,840 506,597
26,023 10,313 66,848 2,113,345
27,248,901 14,291,842 154,231,996 52,224,471
1,606,786 9,300,000 24,881,760 -
Activities
Funds
- - 655,821 -
1,606,786 9,300,000 25,537,581 -
28,855,687 23,591,842 179,769,577 52,224,471
2,594,924 - 42,855,872 -
390,346 - 2,109,116 -
- - 187,113 -
- - - 5,572,970
60,288 160,017 1,628,841 382,603
25,041,783 4,064,468 49,830,997 729,591
45,307,399 22,991,363 337,209,151 15,739,487
73,394,740 27,215,848 433,821,090 22,424,651
102,250,427 50,807,690 613,590,667 74,649,122
(Continued)
27
Attachment number 1 \nPage 39 of 184
Item # 2
Water
and SewerGasSolid Waste
UtilityUtilityUtility
Business-type
Enterprise
City of Clearwater, Florida
Statement of Net Assets
Proprietary Funds
September 30, 2012
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable2,171,234 1,596,310 303,846
Accrued payroll139,049 65,437 75,772
Accrued interest payable6,894 6,788 2,599
Deposits - - -
Unearned revenue and liens- - -
Current portion of long-term liabilities:
Compensated absences399,657 260,828 168,516
Revenue bonds910,833 756,250 -
Capital lease purchases payable40,493 - 79,039
Due to other funds- - -
Claims payable- - -
Total current liabilities (payable from current assets)3,668,160 2,685,613 629,772
Current liabilities (payable from restricted assets):
Construction contracts payable553,401 - -
Accrued interest payable2,815,660 51,713 -
Current portion of long-term liabilities, revenue bonds4,554,167 68,750 -
Customer deposits2,774,736 2,754,000 1,058,368 p ,,,,,,
Total current liabilities payable from restricted assets10,697,964 2,874,463 1,058,368
Total current liabilities14,366,124 5,560,076 1,688,140
Noncurrent liabilities:
Compensated absences251,048 163,841 105,854
Other postemployment benefits803,179 379,939 539,654
Revenue bonds (net of unamortized discounts and
deferred amount on refunding)168,455,484 13,279,210 -
Capital lease purchases payable99,127 - 94,104
Unearned revenue187,113 - -
Advances from other funds- - -
Claims payable- - -
Total non-current liabilities169,795,951 13,822,990 739,612
Total liabilities184,162,075 19,383,066 2,427,752
Net assets:
Invested in capital assets, net of related debt69,513,694 31,750,154 2,616,355
Restricted for:
Revenue bond debt service and sinking fund requirements18,351,901 68,750 -
Revenue bond renewal and replacement requirements16,249,765 300,000 -
Water and sewer impact fees7,330,925 - -
Stormwater system fees- - -
Developer agreements- - -
Unrestricted52,455,090 30,711,715 25,211,308
Total net assets$163,901,375 $62,830,619 $27,827,663
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
28
Attachment number 1 \nPage 40 of 184
Item # 2
Governmental
Activities -
StormwaterOtherInternal Service
UtilityFundsTotalFunds
Activities
Funds
276,425 190,776 4,538,591 3,167,997
37,907 46,836 365,001 137,185
- - 16,281 -
- 66,364 66,364 -
- 19,879 19,879 638,055
137,551 122,899 1,089,451 567,671
91,667 - 1,758,750 -
94,088 39,979 253,599 2,354,607
- 20,271 20,271 91,654
- - - 2,439,700
637,638 507,004 8,128,187 9,396,869
- - 553,401 -
598,453 - 3,465,826 -
1,008,333 - 5,631,250 -
- - 6,587,104 - ,,
1,606,786 - 16,237,581 -
2,244,424 507,004 24,365,768 9,396,869
86,404 77,202 684,349 356,588
230,888 371,294 2,324,954 750,830
36,416,918 - 218,151,612 -
298,203 20,412 511,846 5,324,895
- - 187,113 -
- 60,814 60,814 366,614
- - - 6,983,300
37,032,413 529,722 221,920,688 13,782,227
39,276,837 1,036,726 246,286,456 23,179,096
32,439,973 26,995,440 163,315,616 8,789,576
3,288,277 - 21,708,928 -
- - 16,549,765 -
- - 7,330,925 -
314,981 - 314,981 -
- 9,300,000 9,300,000 -
26,930,359 13,475,524 148,783,996 42,680,450
$62,973,590 $49,770,964 367,304,211 $51,470,026
Net assets of business-type activities$370,213,159
Adjustment to reflect consolidation of
internal service fund activities related to
enterprise funds
2,908,948
29
Attachment number 1 \nPage 41 of 184
Item # 2
Business-type
Enterprise
Water
and SewerGasSolid Waste
UtilityUtilityUtility
Operating revenues:
Sales to customers$61,381,316 $34,864,055 $19,063,602
Service charges to customers512,739 1,298,376 85,584
User charges to customers- - -
Billings to departments- - -
Rentals- - -
Other- - -
Total operating revenues61,894,055 36,162,431 19,149,186
Operating expenses:
Personal services10,229,494 4,787,473 6,028,738
Purchases for resale6,183,615 12,930,759 -
Operating materials and supplies2,887,270 410,119 393,493
Transportation1,017,280 523,616 3,644,567
Utility service2,860,685 100,295 89,945
Dumping charges- - 4,157,291
Depreciation12,322,669 1,728,617 263,867
Interfund administrative charges5,866,550 2,306,490 852,890
Other current charges:
Professional fees1,375,150 277,794 161,933
Advertising- 698,598 10,109
Communications145,756 88,710 51,569
Printing and binding- 14,795 2,468
Insurance667,000 382,824 182,370
Repairs and maintenance6,458,008 62,264 94,859
Rentals- 5,772 1,440
Miscellaneous360,028 141,479 38,169
Data processing charges428,080 293,320 136,880
Taxes- 1,894,788 -
Total other current charges9,434,022 3,860,344 679,797
Total operating expenses50,801,585 26,647,713 16,110,588
Operating income (loss)11,092,470 9,514,718 3,038,598
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Assets
Proprietary Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
30
Attachment number 1 \nPage 42 of 184
Item # 2
Activities
Funds Governmental
Activities -
StormwaterOtherInternal Service
UtilityFundsTotalFunds
$15,754,044 $8,717,388 $139,780,405 $-
70,108 7,255 1,974,062 -
- 1,807,930 1,807,930 -
- - - 41,002,382
- 1,926,180 1,926,180 -
- - - 88,680
15,824,152 12,458,753 145,488,577 41,091,062
2,905,581 3,437,424 27,388,710 10,046,517
- 2,488,188 21,602,562 4,960,473
328,331 343,384 4,362,597 2,158,483
856,093 708,936 6,750,492 269,943
- 404,340 3,455,265 518,711
- - 4,157,291 -
2,625,472 1,541,572 18,482,197 4,787,066
1,298,030 1,684,040 12,008,000 258,451
428,674 388,040 2,631,591 2,178,915
- 31,950 740,657 -
32,034 35,456 353,525 1,025,461
- 10,638 27,901 18,218
50,470 138,780 1,421,444 16,109,666
2,335,346 831,725 9,782,202 2,453,289
- 314,839 322,051 402,691
78,517 276,862 895,055 163,006
167,140 101,560 1,126,980 354,910
- 2,163 1,896,951 5,101
3,092,181 2,132,013 19,198,357 22,711,257
11,105,688 12,739,897 117,405,471 45,710,901
4,718,464 (281,144) 28,083,106 (4,619,839)
(Continued)
31
Attachment number 1 \nPage 43 of 184
Item # 2
Business-type
Enterprise
Water
and SewerGasSolid Waste
UtilityUtilityUtility
City of Clearwater, Florida
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Assets
Proprietary Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
Investment earnings1,731,277 565,554 475,072
Interest expense(7,920,762) (730,547) (10,005)
Amortization of bond issue costs(143,139) (26,883) -
Gain on exchange of capital assets- - -
Loss on exchange of capital assets- (773) -
Other117,922 188,394 313,235
Total nonoperating revenue (expenses)(6,214,702) (4,255) 778,302
Income (loss) before contributions and transfers4,877,768 9,510,463 3,816,900
Capital grants and contributions6,800,417 - -
Transfers in39,623 400,000 -
Transfers out(3,058,700) (3,500,077) (1,004,359)
Changes in net assets8,659,108 6,410,386 2,812,541
Total net assets - beginning155,242,267 56,420,233 25,015,122
Total net assets - ending$163,901,375 $62,830,619 $27,827,663
Adjustment to reflect the consolidation of internal service fund activities related to enterprise funds
Change in net assets of business-type activities (page 19)
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
32
Attachment number 1 \nPage 44 of 184
Item # 2
Activities
Funds Governmental
Activities -
StormwaterOtherInternal Service
UtilityFundsTotalFunds
465,350 407,136 3,644,389 1,061,475
(1,536,268) (4,958) (10,202,540) (188,411)
(32,244) - (202,266) -
- - - 255,956
- (15,800) (16,573) (14,936)
65,446 359,819 1,044,816 140,858
(1,037,716) 746,197 (5,732,174) 1,254,942
3,680,748 465,053 22,350,932 (3,364,897)
71,950 596,845 7,469,212 1,832,949
- - 439,623 2,353,877
(987,272) (869,494) (9,419,902) (255,715)
2,765,426 192,404 20,839,865 566,214
60,208,164 49,578,560 50,903,812
$62,973,590 $49,770,964 $51,470,026
(1,645,079)
$19,194,786
33
Attachment number 1 \nPage 45 of 184
Item # 2
rf1
Water
and SewerGasSolid Waste
UtilityUtilityUtility
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
Cash received from customers$61,471,344 $36,114,218 $19,081,843
Cash received from other funds- - -
Cash payments to suppliers(19,827,711) (17,324,298) (5,077,094)
Cash payments to employees(10,141,920) (5,081,736) (5,913,088)
Cash payments to other funds(9,063,735) (3,304,089) (4,868,276)
Other revenues117,922 188,394 313,235
Net cash provided by operating activities22,555,900 10,592,489 3,536,620
CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Transfers from other funds39,623 400,000 -
Transfers to other funds(3,058,700) (3,500,077) (1,004,359)
Receipt of cash on loans to/from other funds- - -
Payment of cash on loans to/from other funds- - -
Net cash provided (used) by noncapital financing activities(3,019,077) (3,100,077) (1,004,359)
CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND
RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on debt(5,250,790) (653,728) (83,128)
Interest paid(8,072,906) (737,929) (11,696)
Acquisition of capital assets(22,456,858) (2,684,606) (110,963)
Sale of capital assets- - -
Proceeds from issuance of debt9,553 - -
Payment of bond issue costs- - -
Capital contributed by:
Other governmental entities6,240,101 - -
Property owners1,900 - -
Developers558,416 - -
Net cash provided (used) by capital
and related financing activities(28,970,584) (4,076,263) (205,787)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
Interest on investments1,726,525 548,640 457,643
Net cash provided by investing activities1,726,525 548,640 457,643
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(7,707,236) 3,964,789 2,784,117
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year99,791,794 27,394,725 22,376,074
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$92,084,558 $31,359,514 $25,160,191
Cash and cash equivalents classified as:
Cash and investments$42,081,467$28,185,051$24,101,823
Restricted cash and investments50,003,0913,174,4631,058,368
Total cash and cash equivalents$92,084,558 $31,359,514 $25,160,191
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
Business-type
Enterprise
City of Clearwater, Florida
Statement of Cash Flows
Proprietary Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
34
Attachment number 1 \nPage 46 of 184
Item # 2
Governmental
Activities -
StormwaterOtherInternal Service
UtilityFundsTotalFunds
$15,677,369 $12,580,391 $144,925,165 $-
- - - 41,064,488
(2,714,092) (5,200,007) (50,143,202) (28,839,317)
(2,852,921) (3,350,311) (27,339,976) (9,870,918)
(2,452,023) (2,639,250) (22,327,373) (1,413,267)
65,446 359,819 1,044,816 66,675
7,723,779 1,750,642 46,159,430 1,007,661
- - 439,623 2,353,877
(987,272) (869,494) (9,419,902) (255,715)
- - - -
- (407,660) (407,660) (3,541,937)
(987,272) (1,277,154) (9,387,939) (1,443,775)
(21,186,488) (48,583) (27,222,717) (2,443,092)
(1,656,423) (3,838) (10,482,792) (188,411)
(967,849) (754,301) (26,974,577) (4,186,297)
- - - 249,268
20,051,085 - 20,060,638 2,944,116
(228,395) - (228,395) -
216,678 1,882,301 8,339,080 -
- - 1,900 -
- - 558,416 -
(3,771,392) 1,075,579 (35,948,447) (3,624,416)
447,228 399,120 3,579,156 1,038,183
447,228 399,120 3,579,156 1,038,183
3,412,343 1,948,187 4,402,200 (3,022,347)
22,162,640 21,144,289 192,869,522 51,914,402
$25,574,983 $23,092,476 $197,271,722 $48,892,055
$21,373,273$13,792,476$129,534,090$48,892,055
4,201,7109,300,000 67,737,632-
$25,574,983 $23,092,476 $197,271,722 $48,892,055
(Continued)
Activities
Funds
35
Attachment number 1 \nPage 47 of 184
Item # 2
Water
and SewerGasSolid Waste
UtilityUtilityUtility
Business-type
Enterprise
City of Clearwater, Florida
Statement of Cash Flows
Proprietary Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Operating income (loss)$11,092,470 $9,514,718 $3,038,598
Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss)
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Other nonoperating revenue117,922 188,394 313,235
Depreciation12,322,669 1,728,617 263,867
Capitalized labor (219,939) (429,946) -
Change in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable(588,127) (521,309) (126,861)
(Increase) decrease in amount due from other governments(280,756) - -
(Increase) decrease in inventory65,678 (86,510) -
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses6,823 - -
Increase (decrease) in accounts and contracts payable(345,243) (148,400) (127,387)
Increase (decrease) in deposits payable141,292 275,734 59,518
Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue- - -
(Increase) decrease in net pension asset49,657 24,143 28,735
Increase (decrease) in accrued payroll33,495 (34,522) (18,753)
Increase (decrease) in other postemployment benefits159,959 81,570 105,668
Total adjustments11,463,430 1,077,771 498,022
Net cash provided by operating activities$22,555,900 $10,592,489 $3,536,620
Noncash investing, capital and financing activities:
Capital assets transferred from General Government-$ -$ -$
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
36
Attachment number 1 \nPage 48 of 184
Item # 2
Governmental
Activities -
StormwaterOtherInternal Service
UtilityFundsTotalFunds
Activities
Funds
$4,718,464 $(281,144) $28,083,106 $(4,619,839)
65,446 359,819 1,044,816 140,858
2,625,472 1,541,572 18,482,197 4,787,066
- - (649,885) -
(146,783) 110,590 (1,272,490) (36,951)
163,171 - (117,585) -
(14,948) 7,367 (28,413) (5,764)
100 - 6,923 (784,189)
260,297 (85,723) (446,456) 1,414,687
- 10,887 487,431 -
- 161 161 (63,806)
12,738 13,021 128,294 49,798
(8,968) 1,232 (27,516) 27,105
48,790 72,860 468,847 98,696
3,005,315 2,031,786 18,076,324 5,627,500
$7,723,779 $1,750,642 $46,159,430 $1,007,661
-$ -$ -$ 2,735,275$
37
Attachment number 1 \nPage 49 of 184
Item # 2
Pension
TrustAgency
FundsFund
ASSETS
Cash and investments$6,241,408 $269,942
Managed investment accounts, at fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents19,653,025 -
Government bonds46,401,731 -
Agency bonds14,644,181 -
Domestic corporate bonds77,791,095 -
International equity securities60,027,026 -
Domestic stocks274,804,079 -
Mortgage backed bonds57,069,659 -
Asset backed securities1,386,427 -
Domestic equity mutual funds97,425,798 -
International equity mutual funds42,826,095 -
Real estate34,336,944 -
Total managed investment accounts726,366,060 -
Securities lending collateral131,525,918 -
Receivables:
Interest and dividends receivable2,013,320 914
Unsettled investment sales21,900,109 -
Securities lending earnings receivable33,298 -
Total receivables23,946,727 914
Total assets 888,080,113 270,856
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable725,350 -
Unsettled investment purchases10,344,475 -
Obligations under securities lending131,525,918 -
Other miscellaneous payables:
Downtown Development Board- 145,963
Special purpose funds- 7,640
Other - 117,253
Total miscellaneous payables- 270,856
Total liabilities 142,595,743 270,856
NET ASSETS
Held in trust for pension benefits745,484,370 -
Total net assets $745,484,370 $-
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets
Fiduciary Funds
September 30, 2012
38
Attachment number 1 \nPage 50 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Assets
Fiduciary Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
Pension
Trust
Funds
ADDITIONS
Contributions:
Contributions from employer$18,030,265
Contributions from employer - state tax2,010,690
Contributions from employees5,807,091
Total contributions25,848,046
Investment income:
Net appreciation in fair value of investments108,981,094
Interest8,288,417
Dividends6,848,634
124,118,145
Less investment expenses:
Investment management / custodian fees3,569,416
Net income (loss) from investing activities 120,548,729
Securities lending income:
Gross earnings412,642
Rebate received350,324
Bank fees(266,870)
Net income from securities lending 496,096
Total additions 146,892,871
DEDUCTIONS
Benefits and withdrawal payments:
Benefits34,919,353
Withdrawal payments565,865
Total benefits and withdrawal payments35,485,218
Income (loss) before administrative expenses111,407,653
Administrative expenses252,728
Net increase (decrease)111,154,925
Net assets held in trust for pension benefits:
Beginning of year634,329,445
End of year$745,484,370
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
39
Attachment number 1 \nPage 51 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
40
Note I – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The City of Clearwater, Florida (the City) was incorporated in 1923 per Chapter 9710, Special Laws of Florida, as
amended. The City is a Florida municipal corporation governed by a five member City Council including a mayor-council-
member. The City has an estimated population of 108,000 and is located in the four-county Tampa-St. Petersburg-
Clearwater Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), which has an estimated population of 2,783,000.
The financial statements of the City of Clearwater, Florida, reporting entity (City) have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) as applied to governmental units. The Governmental Accounting
Standards Board (GASB) is the standard-setting body for governmental accounting and financial reporting.
Pronouncements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued after November 30, 1989, are not applied in
the preparation of the financial statements of the enterprise fund types in accordance with GASB Statement Number 20.
The GASB periodically updates its codification of the existing Governmental Accounting and Financial Reporting standards
which, along with subsequent GASB pronouncements (Statements and Interpretations), constitutes GAAP for
governmental units. The City’s more significant accounting policies are described below.
A. Financial Reporting Entity
In evaluating the City as a reporting entity, management has included in the accompanying financial statements the City of
Clearwater (the primary government) and its component units, entities for which the government is considered to be
financially accountable. The City has adhered to the standards set forth in GASB Statement No. 14, as amended by GASB
Statement No. 39, in reporting the primary government (including blended component units), the reporting entity, and
related organizations.
Blended Component Unit – Clearwater Community Redevelopment Agency: Component units that meet the criteria for
blended presentation in accordance with GASB Statement Number 14, as amended by GASB Statement No. 39, are
reported in a manner similar to that of the primary government itself. Accordingly, throughout this report, data presented for
the primary government includes data of the following blended component unit. The Clearwater Community
Redevelopment Agency (CRA), created by authority of Florida Statute Chapter 163, Part III, and City of Clearwater
Resolution 81-68, although it is legally separate, is reported as if it were part of the City (blended component unit) due to
the City Council serving as the governing board of the CRA. Separate financial statements for the CRA are not available.
However financial statements for the CRA are included in the City’s comprehensive annual financial report as a
governmental non-major special revenue fund and a governmental non-major capital projects fund.
Related Organization – Clearwater Housing Authority (CHA): CHA is a public housing authority created by City Resolution
69-5 (1969), under Section 421.04 of the Florida Statutes. CHA receives primary funding from the Federal Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The City Council appoints the governing board, however the City Council is not
able to impose its will on the CHA, nor does the City have any responsibility for the budget, debt, financing deficits, or fiscal
management of CHA. Consequently it is not a component unit of the City of Clearwater. Separate audited financial
statements of CHA as of September 30, 2012, are available from CHA.
Related Organization – Downtown Development Board: The City of Clearwater serves as administrative agent for the
Clearwater Downtown Development Board (DDB). The Downtown Development Board is an independent special district of
the City of Clearwater with an independent board elected by its members, with its own levy (0.9651 mills for fiscal 2012) on
downtown properties, and is not financially dependent upon the City. Consequently it is not a component unit of the City of
Clearwater. The DDB’s cash balance held by the City as administrative agent is reflected in the City’s fiduciary agency
fund. Separate audited financial statements of the DDB as of September 30, 2012, are available from the DDB.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 52 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
41
Jointly governed organization – Florida Gas Utility: The City of Clearwater is a member of the Florida Gas Utility (FGU), a
non-profit municipal public entity created for the sole purpose of reducing the costs of purchased gas for its members. FGU
is a public body corporate and politic pursuant to Section 163.01 Florida Statutes (the Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act),
as amended, and the Interlocal Agreement, dated September 1, 1989, which was subsequently amended by the Amended
Interlocal Agreement on June 1, 1992, amended and restated by the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement, dated
July 1, 1996, and thereafter amended and restated by the Second Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement, dated
July 27, 1999, (the Interlocal Agreement), executed and delivered among FGU and its members, which include
municipalities, municipal utilities, and an interlocal agreement consisting of such entities. Due to the diverse needs of
municipal utility systems, FGU established itself as a project-oriented agency. Under this structure, each member has the
option whether or not to participate in a project. FGU has the authority to, among other things, plan, finance, acquire,
construct, manage, operate, deliver, service, utilize, own, broker, exchange, and distribute natural gas, or other energy and
energy services, pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement. As of September 30, 2012, FGU has 25 members. Separate
audited financial statements of FGU as of September 30, 2012, are available from FGU.
B. Basis of Presentation
The City’s Basic Financial Statements contain three components: government-wide financial statements, fund financial
statements, and notes to the financial statements.
1. Government-wide financial statements. The government-wide financial statements report information on all of the
nonfiduciary activities of the primary government and its component unit using the accrual basis of accounting, which is
similar to the accounting used by private-sector businesses. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by
taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which rely to a significant
extent on fees and charges for support.
The statement of net assets presents information on all of the assets and liabilities of the City. The difference between
assets and liabilities is reported as net assets. Changes in net assets may serve as an indicator of whether the financial
position of the City is improving or deteriorating.
The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or segment are offset
by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or segment. Program
revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or
privileges provided by a given function or segment and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the
operational or capital requirements of a particular function or segment. The operating grants include operating-specific and
discretionary (either operating or capital) grants while the capital grants column reflects capital-specific grants. Taxes and
other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. All revenues and
expenses are reported as soon as the underlying transaction has occurred, regardless of when cash is received or paid.
As a general rule the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government-wide financial statements.
Exceptions to this general rule are payments-in-lieu of taxes and other interfund services provided and used. Elimination of
these charges would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported for the various functions concerned.
2. Fund financial statements. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds, and
fiduciary funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government-wide financial statements. An emphasis is on the
major funds in either the governmental or business-type categories. Major individual governmental funds and major
individual enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. Non-major funds (by
category) are summarized into a single column.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 53 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
42
The City reports the following major governmental funds:
The General Fund is the government’s primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general
government, except those required to be accounted for in another fund.
The Special Development Fund is a special revenue fund used to account for impact fees, property taxes for road
improvements, local option gas taxes, infrastructure taxes, and other revenues which are restricted legally or by City
Council policy to be used for specific capital improvement projects.
The Capital Improvement Fund is used to provide combined accounting presentation for all City capital improvement
projects except those financed from proprietary funds or bond proceeds where bond ordinance provisions require the
segregation of bond proceeds in separate funds.
The City reports the following major enterprise funds:
The Water and Sewer Utility enterprise fund is used to account for the financing, construction, operation, and maintenance
of the water and sewer services of the City from charges made to users of the service.
The Gas Utility enterprise fund is used to account for the financing, construction, operation, and maintenance of the gas
services of the City from charges made to the users of the service.
The Solid Waste Utility enterprise fund is used to account for the financing, construction, operation, and maintenance of the
solid waste services of the City from charges made to the users of the service.
The Stormwater Utility enterprise fund is used to account for the financing, construction, operation, and maintenance of the
stormwater management system of the City from charges assessed against each developed property.
Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and
expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with the proprietary
fund’s principal ongoing operations. Operating expenses for proprietary funds include the cost of sales and service,
administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are
reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses.
Additionally, the City reports the following fund types:
Internal service funds account for fleet management, information technology, telephone, employee relations, facilities
management, radio communications, insurance, and risk management services provided to other City departments on a
cost reimbursement basis. The Garage, Administrative Services, General Services, and Central Insurance funds primarily
benefit governmental funds and are consequently included as governmental activities.
Pension trust funds account for the financial operation and condition of the Employees’ Pension Plan, the Firefighters’
Relief and Pension Plan, the Police Supplemental Pension Plan, and the Firefighters Supplemental Pension Plan.
The Treasurer’s Escrow Agency Fund accounts for the receipt, custody, and expenditure of monies held temporarily in an
agency capacity for other parties.
The pension trust funds and the agency fund are fiduciary funds used to account for resources held for the benefit of
parties outside the government. Fiduciary funds are not included in the government-wide financial statements because the
resources of these funds are not available to support the City’s own programs.
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City’s practice to use restricted resources
first, then unrestricted resources as needed.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 54 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
43
C. Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting
The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual
basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund and fiduciary fund financial statements. The agency fund included within
the fiduciary fund financial statements also uses the accrual basis of accounting but does not have a measurement focus.
Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of
related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar
items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met.
Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the
modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available.
Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to
pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the City considers property tax revenues to be available if they are
collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal year. Other revenues are considered to be available if they are
collected within 90 days of fiscal year-end. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under
accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and
claims and judgments, are recorded only when payment is due.
Intergovernmental revenues, representing grants and assistance received from other governmental units, are generally
recognized as revenues in the period when all eligibility requirements, as defined by GASB Statement 33, have been met,
and funds are available from the grantor agency or government.
Taxes, franchise fees, licenses, and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered susceptible to
accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period for the governmental funds. All other revenue
items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the City.
D. Assets, Liabilities, and Net Assets or Fund Balance
1. Deposits, pooled cash, and investments
Investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered to meet the definition of cash equivalents. The
majority of the investments in which the City's funds have equity are held by the City's consolidated pool of cash and
investments. The City utilizes the consolidated cash pool to account for cash and investments of all City funds other than
those that are required by ordinance to be physically segregated. The consolidated cash pool concept allows each
participating fund to benefit from the economies of scale and improved yield that are inherent to a larger investment pool.
Formal accounting records detail the individual equities of the participating funds. The cash pool utilizes a single checking
account for all City receipts and disbursements.
Since fund equities in this cash management pool have the general characteristics of demand deposits in that additional
funds may be deposited at any time and also funds may be withdrawn at any time without prior notice or penalty, each fund's
equity account is considered a cash equivalent regardless of the maturities of investments held by the pool.
All individual fund cash equity in a deficit (overdraft) position with respect to the consolidated cash pool is reclassified at
year-end to short-term interfund payables to the Capital Improvement Fund. The Capital Improvement Fund is the fund
selected by management to reflect the offsetting interfund receivables in such cases.
The City has an agreement with its depository bank to provide that all excess cash is swept daily and automatically into an
overnight money market account which pays interest at the federal funds rate, with no requirement for a minimum
compensating balance. The federal funds rate was 0.25% at September 30, 2012. This account is collateralized through
the State of Florida Public Deposits Program.
Under City Charter and the current Investment Policy, adopted by the City Council on September 9, 2010, consolidated
cash pool investments are limited to the following: United States Government Securities, Certificates of Deposit in Local
Banks, Repurchase Agreements, Savings Accounts in Local Banks, Federal Government Agency Securities, Municipal
Attachment number 1 \nPage 55 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
44
Bonds issued by governmental entities within the state of Florida (other than City of Clearwater issues), and State of
Florida Bonds. All investments are reported at fair value.
The City utilizes a very conservative investment philosophy when it invests its pooled cash funds in that the return of the
principal is more important than the return on the principal. The City does not actively trade its portfolio and generally holds
investments until maturity. Through the use of a laddered approach to maturities and by timing maturities to cash needs, the
City does not anticipate selling investments to meet cash flow requirements.
Under the City’s Investment Policy, a performance measurement standard has been established. The performance measure
chosen is a weighted average of: the overnight interest rate; and three month, six month, one year, three year, five year, and
ten year Treasury rates, respectively. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, the performance measure weighted
average was 0.44%. The actual pooled cash earnings performance before bank charges was 1.56%.
Investments being held outside of the consolidated cash pool include escrowed debt service investments and employee
retirement investments. Permissible escrowed debt service investments are specifically defined in each individual debt
instrument, but generally follow the same limitations applicable to consolidated cash pool investments. The City maintains
four different employee retirement programs, and each one has its own list of permitted investments. Generally, each plan
allows the same type of investments as the consolidated cash pool, but additionally allows some portion of its assets to be
invested in corporate bonds, notes of corporations, and stocks that are listed on one or more of the recognized national or
international stock exchanges.
2. Receivables and payables
Activity between funds that are representative of lending/borrowing arrangements outstanding at the end of the fiscal year
are referred to as either “due to/from other funds” (i.e. the current portion of interfund loans) or “advances to/from other
funds” (i.e. the non-current portion of interfund loans). All other outstanding balances between funds are reported as “due
to/from other funds.” Any residual balances outstanding between the governmental activities and business-type activities
are reported in the government-wide financial statements as “internal balances”.
All trade and property tax receivables are shown net of an allowance for uncollectibles. Trade accounts receivable less
than 60 days are included in the trade accounts receivable allowance for uncollectibles at the five-year average loss
experience rate of 3.45%. Trade accounts receivable in excess of 60 days are reserved at 40%. The property tax
receivable allowance for uncollectibles is 10% of the current year portion of the receivable, and 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and
95% for the receivable portions attributable to the prior five years respectively (fiscal 2007 thru 2011), and 100% of the
receivable attributable to fiscal years 2006 and prior.
Property tax revenue is recognized in the fiscal year for which the taxes are levied, provided the availability test is met, in
conformance with NCGA Interpretation No. 3. Property taxes for the following fiscal year are levied by Council action in
September of each year. This levy is apportioned to property owners based on the previous January 1 assessed values.
Tax bills are mailed out on or about November 1, and the collection period runs from November 1 through March 31. On
April 1, unpaid property taxes are considered delinquent and become a lien. Tax certificates are sold in June for real
property with delinquent taxes.
Since taxes are not collected prior to November 1, the City does not record revenue for advance collections. Uncollected
taxes receivable at year-end are recorded, with an appropriate allowance for estimated uncollectible amounts. The net
amount deemed to be collectible but not current (not expected to be collected within sixty days after the close of the fiscal
year) is shown as deferred revenue in the appropriate fund.
All delinquent property taxes, except those levied specifically for the restricted purposes of financing activities accounted
for in the Special Development Fund, are recorded in the General Fund. Property tax revenues are recognized in the
General Fund and the required transfers to the appropriate debt service or pension fund are recorded as operating
transfers from the General Fund.
The City is permitted by State law to levy ten mills without referendum. Additional millage not subject to the ten mill
limitation is authorized if approved by referendum. The tax rate of 5.1550 mills for the year ended September 30, 2012 was
the same rate that was levied in the preceding fiscal year.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 56 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
45
Water, gas, solid waste, stormwater, and recycling charges to customers are based on actual consumption. Consumption
is determined on a monthly cycle basis. The City recognizes the unbilled consumption as revenue as of September 30th.
3. Inventories and prepaid items
Inventories of proprietary funds are stated at cost and valued on the first-in first-out (FIFO) basis. In governmental funds, the
majority of inventory items are accounted for under the purchases method, which provides that expenditures are recognized
when the inventory item is purchased. The only governmental fund inventory that is accounted for under the consumption
method is the General Fund inventory of items for resale at the City’s public fishing pier. Under the consumption method, the
expenditure is recognized when the inventory item is sold (or consumed).
Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as prepaid items in both
government-wide and fund financial statements.
4. Restricted assets
Certain resources of the City’s enterprise funds are classified as restricted assets. Restricted assets include: Water and
Sewer improvement charges restricted by the authorizing ordinances to the construction of additions and improvements to the
water and sewer systems; Gas Utility and Solid Waste Utility restricted customer deposits; and assets of the Water & Sewer
Utility, Gas Utility, and Stormwater Utility funds restricted under the provisions of authorizing ordinances for revenue bonds to
the payment of future revenue bond debt service, system construction, and renewals and replacements.
5. Capital assets
Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, and certain infrastructure assets, (e.g. roads, bridges, etc.) are
reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activities columns in the government-wide financial statements.
Capital assets, as defined by the City, are assets with an initial individual cost of more than $5,000 (amount not rounded).
Individual assets that cost less than $5,000, but that operate as part of a network system, may be capitalized in the
aggregate, using the group method. Additionally, higher thresholds for capitalization apply to the following categories: land
improvements, $50,000; buildings, building improvements, and utility systems, $100,000; intangible assets, $100,000; and
infrastructure, $500,000. Capital assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or
constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair value at the date of donation. The costs of normal
maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend asset lives are not capitalized.
Major outlays for capital assets and improvements are capitalized as projects are constructed. Interest incurred during the
construction phase of capital assets of business-type activities is included as part of the capitalized value of the assets
constructed. The total interest expense incurred by business-type activities during the current fiscal year was $10,213,024.
Interest expense amounts were netted against related project interest earnings of $12,542, $0, and $0, respectively, to
arrive at net capitalized interest of $503,603, $67,489, and $20,655 for water & sewer, gas, and stormwater system
projects, respectively.
Property, plant, equipment, and intangible assets of the primary government are depreciated using the straight-line method
over the following estimated useful lives:
Attachment number 1 \nPage 57 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
46
Assets Years
Buildings 10 – 40
Public domain infrastructure 20 – 40
Utility systems 18 – 40
Machinery & equipment 5 – 15
Vehicles 5 – 10
Intangible assets 5 – 20
6. Compensated absences
It is the City’s policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and sick pay benefits. Vacation and sick
leave “caps” vary depending upon an employee’s bargaining unit, hire date, etc, but generally employees may accumulate
vacation time not exceeding 320 hours and sick leave not exceeding 1,560 hours. Upon retirement from City service a
qualified employee is paid for all vacation time not exceeding the applicable vacation “cap” and one-half of accumulated
unused sick leave not exceeding the sick leave cap (i.e. maximum pay-out of 780 hours for an employee with a 1,560 hour
cap). The City accrues for all earned but unused vacation pay up to the applicable cap and the portion of unused sick leave
estimated to be payable upon retirement. The current portion of compensated absences is the amount estimated to be used
in the following year. For governmental activities, compensated absences are liquidated within the same governmental funds
where the employee vacation and/or sick leave was earned.
7. Long-term obligations
In the government-wide financial statements, and proprietary fund types in the fund financial statements, long-term debt and
other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, or
proprietary fund type statement of net assets. Bond premiums and discounts, as well as issuance costs, are deferred and
amortized over the life of the bonds using the straight-line method. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond
premium or discount. Bond issuance costs are reported as deferred charges and amortized over the term of the related debt.
In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance
costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received
on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing
uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service
expenditures.
8. Fund balance policies
The fund balance of governmental funds is reported in various classifications that comprise a hierarchy based primarily on
the extent to which the government is bound to observe constraints imposed upon the use of the resources reported in the
governmental funds. Each classification of fund balance is based on the relative strength of the constraints that control how
specific amounts can be spent.
The order of spending follows the same hierarchy. Restricted resources are applied first when expenditures are incurred
for purposes for which either restricted or unrestricted (committed, assigned or unassigned) amounts are available.
Similarly, within unrestricted fund balance, committed amounts are reduced first followed by assigned, and then
unassigned amounts when expenditures are incurred for purposes for which amounts in any of the unrestricted fund
balance classifications could be used.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 58 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
47
Nonspendable fund balance represents amounts that cannot be spent, such as inventories, prepaid amounts, and
amounts that are legally or contractually required to remain intact.
Restricted fund balance includes amounts that can be spent only for the specific purposes stipulated by constitution,
external resource providers, or through enabling legislation.
Committed fund balance includes amounts that can be used only for the specific purposes determined by the adoption of
an ordinance prior to the end of the fiscal year by the City Council, the highest level of decision-making authority. Once
adopted by ordinance, a commitment can only be revised or removed by the adoption of another ordinance.
Assigned fund balance includes amounts that are intended to be used by the government for specific purposes but do not
meet the criteria to be classified as restricted or committed because they are supported by management’s intent rather
than a formal action of the City Council. The Finance Director is authorized by Section 2.511 of the Code of Ordinances to
assign fund balance. Since assignments only exist temporarily, no further action is required to revise or remove them.
Unassigned fund balance includes amounts not classified in the above categories. Positive unassigned fund balance may
only be reported in the general fund. In all other funds, unassigned fund balance is limited to negative residual fund
balances.
Minimum fund balance: Per City Council Policy a minimum General Fund unassigned balance of 8.0% of the subsequent
year’s budgeted expenditures must be maintained as a contingency fund for unanticipated financial needs. In addition,
0.5% of the subsequent year’s budgeted expenditures must be maintained to fund unanticipated retirements of employees
residing in General Fund departments. Budgeted appropriations will maintain these minimum reserves of 8.5% of
subsequent year’s budgeted expenditures, with excess reserves available for specific capital improvement projects or other
“one-time” needs.
Stabilization arrangement. As of September 30, 2012, the City Council has not established a revenue stabilization
reserve.
Note II – Stewardship, Compliance, and Accountability
A. Budgets and budgetary accounting
Annual budgets are legally adopted for the General Fund, Special Development special revenue fund, and the Community
Redevelopment Agency special revenue fund. The budget for the Special Development Fund is adopted on a basis
consistent with GAAP, and appropriations lapse at year-end. Appropriations for open encumbered purchase orders at year-
end in the General Fund do not lapse, but rather continue until liquidated or otherwise cancelled by City Council action. For
the General Fund budgetary comparison statements, actual expenditures have been adjusted to include end-of-year
encumbrances and to exclude beginning-of-year encumbrances, in order to provide a meaningful comparison. Except for the
treatment of encumbrances and certain transactions relating to interfund loans, the General Fund Budget is adopted on a
basis consistent with GAAP, and all non-encumbered appropriations lapse at year-end.
The level of budgetary control established by the legislative body, the level on which expenditures may not legally exceed
appropriations, is the individual fund. In accordance with provisions of Ordinance 5025-90 and with Section 2.519(4) of the
Clearwater Code, the City Manager may transfer part or all of any unencumbered appropriation balance among programs
within an operating fund, provided such action does not result in the discontinuance of a program. Such transfers must be
included in the next budget review presented to the City Council. Upon detailed written request by the City Manager, the
City Council may by ordinance transfer part or all of any unencumbered appropriation balance from one fund to another.
As established by administrative policy, department directors may transfer money from one operating code to another
within a program without a formal written amendment. Formal requests for budget amendments from department directors
are required for transfers, capital expenditures, and reserves. Thus, certain object classifications within departmental
and/or program budget appropriations are subject to administratively imposed controls, in addition to the legal controls
imposed by City Council action described above.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 59 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
48
The Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Fund annual budget is adopted by the trustees of that agency in accordance
with state law. The level of budgetary control is the total fund. The CRA Fund Budget is adopted on a basis consistent with
GAAP, and all appropriations lapse at year-end.
Budget amounts presented in the accompanying financial statements reflect all amendments adopted by the City Council
and the governing board of the component unit. All amendments were adopted in conformance with legal requirements.
Individual amendments, as well as the net effects of all amendments during the fiscal year, were not material in relation to
the original appropriations for the governmental funds in the aggregate.
Budgets for the Capital Projects Funds, the Special Programs Fund, the Local Housing Assistance Trust Fund, and the
Pinellas County Local Housing Assistance Trust Fund are adopted on a multi-year completed program basis, where
budgetary appropriations do not lapse at year-end, but may extend across two or more fiscal years. A comparison of annual
results with these budgets would not be meaningful and is therefore not included in this report.
All City Council adopted budgets are integrated into the formal accounting system to allow for monthly comparison of
projected and actual results in all funds for which budgets are adopted.
Note III – Detailed Notes on All Funds
A. Deposits and investments
Investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered to meet the definition of cash equivalents. The
majority of the investments in which the City's proprietary funds have equity are held by the City's consolidated pool of cash
and investments. Since fund equities in this cash management pool have the general characteristics of demand deposits, in
that additional funds may be deposited at any time and also funds may be withdrawn at any time without prior notice or
penalty, each fund's equity account is considered a cash-equivalent regardless of the maturities of investments held by the
pool. Funds with deficit (overdraft) positions within the consolidated pool report the deficits as interfund payables to the City's
Capital Improvement Fund.
Deposits
All cash of the City is entirely insured either by federal depository insurance or via banks’ participation as qualified public
depositories pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 280, “Security for Public Deposits”. The City is required to verify that
monies are invested in “qualified public depositories” as defined in Florida Statutes section 280.02.
Pooled Cash and Investments
To increase returns and minimize fees, the City follows the practice of pooling available cash and investments of all funds
with the exception of retirement plan investments and assets held under Bond Trust Indenture Agreements. Please refer
to Note (I)(D)(1) for a discussion of allowable investments under the pooled cash and investments investment policy. All
investments at year-end were in compliance with the pooled cash and investments investment policy.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 60 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
49
Carrying% ofWeighted avgMoody's
Pooled Cash and Investments Amount Portfolio maturity (years)Rating
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash on hand43,772$ 0.01%N/AN/A
Money Markets19,715,028 5.75%N/AN/A
Total cash and cash equivalents19,758,800
Investments:
Treasuries2,286,953 0.67%6.00Aaa
U.S. Agencies:
Farmer Mac (FAMCA)17,433,198 5.08%1.77Aaa
Government National Mortgage Assn (GNMA)25,454,772 7.42%2.81Aaa
Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB)30,804,887 8.98%1.66Aaa
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)47,065,679 13.72%4.71Aaa
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Assn (FHLMC) 19,522,682 5.69%2.22Aaa
Federal National Mortgage Assn (FNMA)57,708,994 16.82%6.19Aaa
Federal National Mortgage Assn (FNMA) Zeroes8,055,340 2.35%9.46Aaa
Dept of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)4,768,401 1.39%4.94Aaa
Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA)7,149,157 2.08%2.35Ba1/NR
Other Government Sponsored Agencies7,398,173 2.16%2.72Aaa
Other Government Sponsored Agencies - Zeroes6,910,143 2.01%5.37Aaa
Total U.S. Agencies232,271,426
Municipal bonds34,969,268 10.19%2.89Aa1/Aa2/Aa3
Municipal bonds17,580,117 5.12%3.54A1/A2/A3
Municipal bonds3,930,706 1.15%5.64NR
Total municipal bonds56,480,091
Asset Backed Bonds10,449,212 3.05%5.38Aaa
Collateralized mortgage obligations21,795,440 6.35%2.80Aaa
Total investments323,283,122
Total pooled cash and investments343,041,922$ 100.00%3.85
Attachment number 1 \nPage 61 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
50
Cash and investments as of September 30, 2012 are classified in the accompanying financial statements as follows:
Statement of net assets 09/30/12
Primary Government:
Cash and investments268,792,940$
Restricted cash and investments67,737,632
Fiduciary Funds:
Cash and investments-pension funds6,241,408
Cash and investments-agency fund269,942
Total cash and investments343,041,922$
Interest Rate Risk – Pooled Cash and Investments:
As a means of limiting exposure to fair value losses arising from rising interest rates, the City’s pooled cash investment
policy prohibits investments in securities maturing more than fifteen years from the date of purchase, unless matched to a
specific cash flow requirement. Additionally, the policy allows no more than 10% of the portfolio to have maturities in
excess of ten years unless specifically matched against a debt or obligation. Finally, the policy requires that the weighted
average maturity be four years or less, except for temporary situations due to market conditions and/or cash needs when
the average maturity may exceed four years but shall not exceed five years. Weighted average maturities for the City’s
pooled cash investments are indicated in the table above.
Credit Risk – Pooled Cash and Investments:
The City’s pooled cash investment policy, in accordance with Florida Statutes, allows investments to direct obligations of the
United States, federal agencies, debt issued by the State of Florida or any political subdivision, and commercial paper of
prime quality of the highest letter and numerical rating as provided by at least one nationally recognized rating service.
Ratings for the City’s pooled cash investments are disclosed in the preceding table.
Concentration of Credit Risk – Pooled Cash and Investments:
The City’s pooled cash investment policy limits the investment in any one issuer to 40% of the portfolio. Concentrations for
several issuers exceeded 5% as disclosed in the preceding table, though none exceeded the 40% limit per the policy.
Pension Plan Assets
The City reports four pension funds in the accompanying financial statements. Each of the plans has a separate governing
board of trustees, a separate investment policy, and differing investment restrictions/risks. Consequently each is disclosed
separately below. All investments at year-end were in compliance with the respective plan investment policies. Please
refer to Note (I)(D)(1) for a discussion of allowable investments under the pension plans.
Employees Pension Plan
At year-end, the Employees’ Pension Plan cash and investment balances were as follows:
Attachment number 1 \nPage 62 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
51
Carrying% of Weighted avgS&P
Employees' Pension Plan Cash and Investments Amount Portfolio maturity (years)Rating
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and cash equivalents - pooled cash 2,707,983$ 0.39%N/AN/A
Cash in managed investment accounts 19,123,176 2.74%N/AN/A
Total cash and cash equivalents 21,831,159
Investments:
Government bonds 32,290,462 4.62%Aaa
Government bonds 865,937 0.12%Aa2
Government bonds 3,819,796 0.55%A1
Government bonds 2,003,981 0.29%A2
Government bonds 1,005,606 0.14%A3
Government bonds 2,974,461 0.43%Baa1/WR
U.S. agencies 4,362,747 0.62%AGY
U.S. agencies 5,163,076 0.74%Aaa
U.S. agencies 404,416 0.06%Aa1
U.S. agencies 707,097 0.10%Aa3
U.S. agencies 141,815 0.02%Baa1
Domestic corporate bonds 3,383,824 0.48%Aa1/Aa2/Aa3
Domestic corporate bonds 22,031,996 3.15%A1/A2/A3
Domestic corporate bonds 43,584,459 6.24%Baa1/Baa2/Baa3
Domestic corporate bonds 1,680,796 0.24%Ba1/Ba2/Ba3
Domestic corporate bonds 515,000 0.07%B1/B2/B3
Domestic corporate bonds 1,802,208 0.26%NRWR
Asset backed bonds 1,386,427 0.20%16.1 Aaa/Baa2/NR
Domestic stocks 264,952,603 37.94%N/AN/A
International equity securities 60,027,026 8.60%N/AN/A
Mortgage backed bonds 55,656,320 7.97%24.2 AGY/Aaa
International equity mutual funds 38,990,976 5.58%N/AN/A
Domestic equity mutual funds 94,454,202 13.52%N/AN/A
Real Estate/Timber 34,336,944 4.92%
Total investments 676,542,175
Total cash and investments 698,373,334$ 100.00%
9.7
7.4
6.3
Interest Rate Risk – Employees’ Pension Plan:
As a means of limiting exposure to fair value losses arising from rising interest rates, the Employees’ Pension Plan
investment policy limits the investment in fixed income investments to no more than 50% of the portfolio. There are no
limits related to weighted average maturities due to the long-term nature of pension plan investing.
Credit Risk – Employees’ Pension Plan:
The Employees’ Pension Plan investment policy limits credit risk by restricting equity investments to corporations that are
listed on one of the national or international stock exchanges. Additionally, fixed income corporate bonds must carry an
“investment grade” rating as established by one of the nationally recognized rating agencies. At September 30, 2012, the
Plan had $3,998,004 invested in domestic corporate bonds that had fallen below investment grade (Ba1 and lower) as the
result of investment downgrades, as indicated on the table above. The respective money managers notified the Plan
Attachment number 1 \nPage 63 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
52
administrators of the downgrades and the planned courses of action related to these securities on a timely basis,
consistent with the policy’s individual manager guidelines.
Concentration of Credit Risk – Employees’ Pension Plan:
The Employees’ Pension Plan investment policy limits concentration of credit risk by limiting the investment in common
stock or capital stock of any one corporation to 3% of the plan equity assets, unless due to a higher percentage included in
a nationally recognized market index at least as broad as the Standard and Poor’s Composite Index of 500 companies, or
upon a specific finding by the investment committee that such higher percentage is in the best interest of the fund.
Additionally, the individual manager guidelines associated with the policy provide further diversification of both equity and
fixed income investments to minimize concentration of credit risk.
Foreign Currency Risk – Employees’ Pension Plan:
Risk of loss arises from changes in currency exchange rates. The Employees’ Pension Plan investment policy does not
have a formal policy to limit foreign currency risk, other than a guideline of no more than 25% of the plan assets invested in
international equities. The Pension Plan’s exposure to foreign currency risk is as follows:
Investment Currency Fair Value Investment Currency Fair Value
Common StockHong Kong Dollar6,376,677 Common StockHungary Forint564,152
Common StockUnited Kingdom UK Pound3,496,736 Common StockEgypt Pound553,372
Common StockJapanese Yen2,888,967 Common StockQatar Rial546,186
Common StockTaiwan Dollar2,376,626 Common StockMorocco Dirham542,592
Common StockSouth Korea Won2,296,135 Common StockColombia Peso492,286
Common StockMexico Pesos2,225,706 Common StockU.A.E. Emirati Dirham477,912
Common StockSouth Africa Rand2,170,369 Common Stock Netherlands Euro 359,772
Common StockBrazil Real2,121,500 Common StockNigeria N'aira309,026
Common StockIndia Rupee2,091,316 Common StockKenya Shilling305,433
Common StockAustria Euro1,626,168 Common StockPakistan Rupee283,873
Common StockNorwegian Krone1,331,155 Common StockJordan Dinar280,279
Common StockSingapore Dollar1,302,312 Common StockOman Rial280,279
Common StockThailand Bath1,182,204 Common StockCroatia Kuna244,346
Common StockPoland Zloty1,160,644 Common Stock France Euro 237,432
Common StockIndonesia Rupiah1,149,864 Common StockPeru nuevo sol222,786
Common StockMalaysia Ringgit1,128,304 Common StockRomania N'ew Leu190,446
Common StockChile Peso1,121,118 Common StockMauritius Rupee129,360
Common StockTurkey Liras1,121,118 Common StockTunisian Dinar104,206
Common StockSwedish Krona1,032,545 Common StockBangladesh Taka93,426
Common StockCzeck Rep Koruna977,890 Common StockBotswana Pula64,680
Common StockSwiss Franc744,728 Common StockGhana Cedi21,560
Common StockGermany Euro590,026 Common StockRussian Ruble14,373
Common StockKuwait Dinar589,305 Common StockChinese Yan Renminibi3,593
Common StockPhilippines Peso578,526 Common StockBulgaria Lev3,593
Total48,004,902$
Attachment number 1 \nPage 64 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
53
Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan
At year-end, the Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan cash and investment balances were as follows:
Carrying% ofWeighted avgMoody's
Amount Portfolio maturity (years)Rating
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and cash equivalents2,713,437$ 45.71%N/AN/A
Total cash and cash equivalents2,713,437
Investments:
U.S. agency - Farmer Mac (FAMCA)1,219,675 20.55%4.40Aaa
U.S. agency - Fannie Mae (FNMA)1,008,977 17.00%4.55Aaa
U.S. agency - Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)993,822 16.74%4.59Aaa
Total investments3,222,474
Total managed cash and investments5,935,911$ 100.00%
Interest Rate Risk – Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan:
As a means of limiting exposure to fair value losses arising from rising interest rates, the Firefighters’ Relief and Pension
Plan investment policy limits the target investment in fixed income investments to no more than 70% of the portfolio. There
are no limits related to weighted average maturities due to the long-term nature of pension plan investing.
Credit Risk – Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan:
The Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan investment policy limits credit risk by restricting the fixed income investments to
investment grade securities, per a nationally recognized ranking agency.
Concentration of Credit Risk – Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan:
The Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan investment policy limits concentration of credit risk by limiting the target allocation
of the plan to domestic fixed income to 70% of the portfolio, with the remainder of the portfolio allocated to the City’s well-
diversified pooled cash portfolio (see above disclosure). There are no additional limitations on concentrations with
individual issuers or agencies due to the relatively small portfolio of this closed pension plan.
Foreign Currency Risk – Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan:
The Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan investment policy does not permit investment in foreign fixed income or equity
securities.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 65 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
54
Police Supplemental Pension Plan
At year-end, the Police Supplemental Pension Plan cash and investment balances were as follows:
Carrying% ofWeighted avgMoody's
Amount Portfolio maturity (years)Rating
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash in bank 819,988$ 5.2%N/A N/A
Cash in managed investment accounts151,634 1.0%N/A N/A
Total cash and cash equivalents971,622
Investments:
Treasuries2,942,887 18.7%7.40Aaa
U.S. agencies642,556 4.1%1.90Aaa
Domestic corporate bonds946,367 6.0%A1/A2/A3
Domestic corporate bonds81,586 0.5%Aa3
Domestic corporate bonds148,339 0.9%Baa1/Baa2
Domestic corporate bonds39,030 0.2%N/R
Domestic stocks7,721,708 49.0%N/A N/A
Mortgage backed bonds1,739 0.0%0.003N/A
International equity mutual funds2,253,561 14.3%N/A N/A
Total investments14,777,773
Total managed cash and investments15,749,395$ 100.0%
6.20
Interest Rate Risk – Police Supplemental Pension Plan:
As a means of limiting exposure to fair value losses arising from rising interest rates, the Police Supplemental Pension
Plan investment policy limits the duration of the fixed income portfolio to 125% of the duration of the Barclays
Government/Credit Bond Index subject to quarterly review. Additionally, no issues, Treasury, or Corporate Bonds may be
purchased with more than 15 years to maturity.
Credit Risk – Police Supplemental Pension Plan:
The Police Supplemental Pension Plan investment policy limits credit risk by restricting equity investments to corporations
that are listed on any one or more of the recognized national stock exchanges. Additionally, fixed income security
investments are limited to U.S. Government and agency obligations; “A” rated or higher corporate bonds, debentures and
preferred stocks; and bonds and other evidence of indebtedness issued or guaranteed by a corporation organized under
the laws of the United States, any state, or organized territory of the United States or District of Columbia provided the
corporation meets the standards set forth in section 185.06(1)(b), Florida Statutes as amended from time to time. Finally,
the investment policy requires that investment managers dispose of any issue that has been downgraded below “A” as
soon as is economically feasible.
Concentration of Credit Risk – Police Supplemental Pension Plan:
The Police Supplemental Pension Plan investment policy limits concentration of credit risk by limiting the stock position of
the equity portfolio to no more than 3 percentage points in excess of the S&P 500. Additionally, any sector position of the
equity portfolio may not exceed the S&P 500 sector weighting by more than 10 percentage points without written approval
from the Board. Investments in fixed income securities of a single issuer with the exception of the U.S. Government and its
agencies may not exceed 5 percent of the fixed income portfolio’s value at cost.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 66 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
55
Foreign Currency Risk – Police Supplemental Pension Plan:
Risk of loss arises from changes in currency exchange rates. The Police Supplemental Pension Plan investment policy
does not have a formal policy to limit foreign currency risk, other than a guideline of that no more than 25% of the total
portfolio at cost may be invested in foreign securities. The Plan has no current exposure to foreign currency risk.
Firefighters Supplemental Pension Plan
At year-end, the Firefighters Supplemental Pension Plan cash and investment balances were as follows:
Carrying% ofWeighted avgMoody's
Amount Portfolio maturity (years)Rating
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash in managed investment accounts378,215$ 3.0%N/A N/A
Total cash and cash equivalents378,215
Investments:
U.S. Treasury obligations307,033 2.4%11.80Aaa
Municipal obligations123,471 1.0%A2, Aa3
Municipal obligations35,353 0.3%Baa1
Municipal obligations32,743 0.3%N/R
Domestic corporate bonds1,600,899 12.8%A1, A2, A3
Domestic corporate bonds125,329 1.0%Aa3
Domestic corporate bonds94,612 0.7%Ba2
Domestic corporate bonds1,548,824 12.3%Baa1, Baa2, Baa3
Domestic corporate bonds37,137 0.3%N/A
Domestic corporate bonds170,690 1.4%N/R
Domestic stocks2,129,769 17.0%N/A N/A
Mortgage backed bonds1,411,600 11.2%18.50N/A
Domestic equity mutual funds2,971,595 23.7%N/A N/A
International equity mutual funds1,581,558 12.6%N/A N/A
Total investments12,170,613
Total managed cash and investments12,548,828$ 100.0%
8.00
7.80
Interest Rate Risk – Firefighters Supplemental Pension Plan:
As a means of limiting exposure to fair value losses arising from rising interest rates, the Firefighters Supplemental
Pension Plan investment policy limits the duration of the fixed income portfolio to 135% of the duration of the Barclay’s
Capital Aggregate Bond Index.
Credit Risk – Firefighters Supplemental Pension Plan:
The Firefighters Supplemental Pension Plan investment policy limits credit risk by restricting equity investments to
securities that are fully and easily negotiable. Investments in corporations whose stock has been publicly traded for less
than one year are limited to 15% of the equity portfolio. Investment in equity securities whose market capitalization is less
than $2 billion dollars shall be limited to 25% of the total equity portfolio. The average credit quality of the bond portfolio
shall be “A” or higher, and those securities rated below “BBB” shall not exceed 15% of the entire fixed income portfolio.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 67 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
56
Concentration of Credit Risk – Firefighters Supplemental Pension Plan:
The Firefighters Supplemental Pension Plan investment policy limits concentration of credit risk by limiting the investment
in common stock or capital stock of any one issuing company within an investment manager’s portfolio to 5% of the
portfolio. Similarly, no more than 5% of a fixed income investment manager’s portfolio may be invested in the securities of
any single corporate issuer per the plan investment policy. Finally, investments in collateralized mortgage obligations are
limited to 25% of the investment manager’s total portfolio.
Foreign Currency Risk – Firefighters Supplemental Pension Plan:
Risk of loss arises from changes in currency exchange rates. The Firefighters Supplemental Pension Plan requires that no
more than 25% of the plan’s total assets may be invested in foreign equity securities, commingled or mutual funds. Direct
investment in foreign companies is limited to those traded on a national exchange and/or American Depository Receipts
(ADR’s).
B. Receivables
Receivables as of year-end for the City’s governmental, proprietary and internal service funds, including the applicable
allowances for uncollectible accounts for the proprietary funds, are segregated on the fund financial statements. The
Mortgages, Notes, and Other Loans amount of $17,011,899 reported on the Governmental Funds balance sheet includes
$16,930,566 of long-term loans receivable that are not expected to be collected within the next fiscal year. Mortgage notes
receivable and related payment history are reviewed individually on an annual basis to determine collectability for
allowance and bad debt determinations.
Receivables as of year-end for the primary government’s individual major funds, as well as non-major funds and internal
service funds in the aggregate, are as follows:
Receivables, net of applicable allowances for uncollectible accounts (amounts in thousands):
Franchise
Taxes Fees Interest Accounts Notes Other Total
General fund1,715$ 936$ 150$ 181$ -$ -$ 2,982$
Special Development 64 - 178 - - - 242
Capital Improvement- - 2 - - - 2
Non-major governmental funds- - 84 - 17,281 88 17,453
Internal service funds- - 237 - - 47 284
Total governmental1,779 936 651 181 17,281 135 20,963
Less: Allowance for uncollectible(614) - - - (269) - (883)
Net governmental receivables1,165$ 936$ 651$ 181$ 17,012$ 135$ 20,080$
Water and Sewer Utility-$ -$ 429$ 6,047$ -$ 187$ 6,663$
Gas Utility- - 129 2,780 - 458 3,367
Solid Waste Utility- - 105 1,845 - - 1,950
Stormwater Utility- - 103 2,248 - - 2,351
Non-major enterprise funds- - 96 288 - - 384
Total business-type- - 862 13,208 - 645 14,715
Less: Allowance for uncollectible- - - (247) - - (247)
Net business-type receivables-$ -$ 862$ 12,961$ -$ 645$ 14,468$
Attachment number 1 \nPage 68 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
57
C. Capital assets
Capital asset activity for the year ended September 30, 2012:
BeginningEnding
Governmental Activities:BalanceIncreasesDecreasesBalance
Non-depreciable capital assets:
Land79,113,502$ 1,513,780$ -$ 80,627,282$
Construction in progress5,189,267 7,394,898 (7,451,633) 5,132,532
Total non-depreciable capital assets84,302,769 8,908,678 (7,451,633) 85,759,814
Depreciable capital assets:
Buildings129,260,822 2,391,816 - 131,652,638
Improvements other than buildings29,097,221 408,706 - 29,505,927
Machinery and equipment76,682,651 4,602,341 (2,528,532) 78,756,460
Infrastructure139,403,762 3,863,525 - 143,267,287
Total depreciable capital assets374,444,456 11,266,388 (2,528,532) 383,182,312
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Buildings(39,535,033) (4,218,457) - (43,753,490)
Improvements other than buildings(12,482,708) (1,282,713) - (13,765,421)
Machinery and equipment(58,444,342) (5,621,633) 2,357,221 (61,708,754)
Infrastructure(71,124,649) (4,650,545) - (75,775,194)
Total accumulated depreciation(181,586,732) (15,773,348) 2,357,221 (195,002,859)
Net depreciable capital assets192,857,724 (4,506,960) (171,311) 188,179,453
Net governmental activities capital assets277,160,493$ 4,401,718$ (7,622,944)$ 273,939,267$
BeginningEnding
Business-type activities:Balance Increases Decreases Balance
Non-depreciable capital assets:
Land31,280,681$ 86,877$ -$ 31,367,558$
Construction in progress12,201,126 12,872,127 (6,609,814) 18,463,439
Total non-depreciable capital assets43,481,807 12,959,004 (6,609,814) 49,830,997
Depreciable capital assets:
Buildings25,769,172 472,129 - 26,241,301
Improvements other than buildings528,165,333 19,164,259 (415,837) 546,913,755
Machinery and equipment9,654,877 329,741 (285,672) 9,698,946
Total depreciable capital assets563,589,382 19,966,129 (701,509) 582,854,002
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Buildings(13,502,688) (936,760) - (14,439,448)
Improvements other than buildings(207,309,028) (16,936,151) 415,837 (223,829,342)
Machinery and equipment(7,035,874) (609,286) 269,099 (7,376,061)
Total accumulated depreciation(227,847,590) (18,482,197) 684,936 (245,644,851)
Net depreciable capital assets335,741,792 1,483,932 (16,573) 337,209,151
Net business-type activities capital assets379,223,599$ 14,442,936$ (6,626,387)$ 387,040,148$
Attachment number 1 \nPage 69 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
58
Depreciation expense was charged to functions / programs of the primary government as follows:
Governmental activities:
General government763,433$
Public safety 1,110,511
Physical environment128,503
Transportation, including depreciation of general infrastructure assets4,610,851
Economic environment22,957
Culture and recreation4,350,027
Capital assets held by the governmental internal service funds are charged
to the various functions based on their usage of the assets
Total depreciation expense - governmental activities15,773,348$
4,787,066
Business-type activities:
Water and sewer utility12,322,669$
Gas utility 1,728,617
Solid waste utility263,867
Stormwater utility2,625,472
Recycling utility127,024
Marine operations111,273
Aviation operations197,481
Parking system operations275,688
Harborview Center operations502,792
Clearwater Harbor Marina operations327,314
Total depreciation expense - business-type activities18,482,197$
Construction commitments
At September 30, 2012, material outstanding construction commitments were as follows:
Construction
Commitments
ProjectFundOutstanding
Reverse Osmosis Plant Expansion - Reservoir #2Water & Sewer Utility enterprise fund907,747$
Reverse Osmosis Plant Expansion - Reservoir #1Water & Sewer Utility enterprise fund1,815,818
Reclaimed Water Distribution SystemWater & Sewer Utility enterprise fund1,202,378
Sanitary Sewer Renewal & ReplacementWater & Sewer Utility enterprise fund1,269,780
Water Pollution Control Repair & ReplacementWater & Sewer Utility enterprise fund619,300
Facilities Upgrades & ImprovementsWater & Sewer Utility enterprise fund6,785,587
Wastewater Treatment Plant New Presses Water & Sewer Utility enterprise fund582,600
Storm Pipe System ImprovementsStormwater Utility enterprise fund645,355
Total Construction Commitments 13,828,565$
Attachment number 1 \nPage 70 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
59
D. Interfund receivables, payables, and transfers
1. Interfund balances
As discussed in Note III-A, individual fund deficits in the consolidated cash pool, if any, have been reclassified as of
September 30, 2012, as interfund loans from the Capital Improvement Fund, which was selected by management for this
purpose. This reclassification results in a corresponding reduction in the cash equity in the Capital Improvement Fund,
offset by an increase in interfund receivables.
As of September 30, 2012, the Notes and Mortgages debt service fund reported a cash pool deficit of $87,329.
The amounts of the reclassified cash pool deficits, if any, as well as the current portion of other individual fund interfund
payable and receivable balances are classified as Due from/to Other Funds. The long-term portions of other interfund
balances are classified as Advances to/from Other Funds.
Due fromDue toAdvances toAdvances from
FundOther FundsOther FundsOther FundsOther Funds
Special Revenue Funds:
Special Programs-$ -$ 974,267$ -$
Community Redevelopment Agency- 316,667 - 2,557,600
Debt Service Fund:
Notes and Mortgages- 87,329 - -
Capital Project Fund:
Capital Improvement87,329 - - 3,562,209
Enterprise Fund:
Aviation Operations- 20,271 - 60,814
Internal Service Funds:
Administrative Services- 91,654 - 366,614
Central Insurance428,592 - 5,572,970 -
515,921$ 515,921$ 6,547,237$ 6,547,237$
Descriptions of interfund loans as of September 30, 2012:
An internal ten-year loan from the Central Insurance Fund to the Administrative Services Fund for purchase and installation
of fiber optic cable and termination equipment. The loan provides for ten annual payments of $91,654 plus interest at the
cash-pool rate, due on September 30 of each year. The loan commenced September 30, 2003 with the first annual
principal payment due September 30, 2008, the year that the infrastructure project was completed. The current portion
($91,654) is classified as due to/from other funds, while the long-term portion ($366,614) is classified as an advance.
An internal five-year loan from the Central Insurance Fund to the Aviation Operations enterprise fund, for the construction
of a new multi plane hangar, in the amount of $101,357. The loan provides for five annual payments of $20,271 plus
interest at the cash-pool rate, due on September 30 of each year. The loan commenced April 2, 2008, with the first
principal payment due September 30, 2012, the year that construction was completed. The current portion of this loan
($20,271) is classified as due to/from other funds, while the long-term portion ($60,814) is classified as an advance.
Three internal loans from the Special Programs special revenue fund to the Community Redevelopment Agency special
revenue fund totaling $974,267 related to the purchase, remediation, and development of downtown parcels. A loan in the
amount of $350,000 approved on May 19, 2005, and a subsequent loan of an additional $350,000 approved on June 5, 2008,
are related to the Clearwater Automotive site. An unused portion of $51,173 was repaid in fiscal 2010, leaving a balance of
$648,827 for these two loans. A third loan in the amount of $325,440, approved on September 1, 2011, is related to the Car
Attachment number 1 \nPage 71 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
60
Pro site. These loans are interest-free and are to be repaid upon sale of the developed parcels. Because the first principal
payment is not due within one year, these loans are classified as an advance.
An internal loan from the Central Insurance Fund to the Community Redevelopment Agency special revenue fund in the
amount of $1,900,000 to underwrite the acquisition, closing costs and site demolition costs related to the acquisition of the
Economy Inn and surrounding properties in the East Gateway area for redevelopment purposes. This loan, which
commenced on September 9, 2010, provides for interest-only payments at the cash-pool rate through fiscal year 2012, and
level debt service (principal and interest) from fiscal year 2013 through fiscal year 2018. The current portion of this loan
($316,667) is classified as due to/due from other funds, while the long-term portion ($1,583,333) is classified as an advance.
An internal loan in the amount of $3,562,209 from the Central Insurance Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund for the
expansion and renovation of the Capitol Theatre. This loan, which commenced on September 20, 2012, provides for
payment from infrastructure sales tax (“Penny for Pinellas”) revenues when available, which is projected for fiscal 2015.
Because the first principal payment is not due within one year, this loan is classified as an advance.
2. Interfund transfers
Interfund transfers for the year ended September 30, 2012, consisted of the following:
Transfers to General Fund from:
Capital Improvements Fund 618,646$
Water & Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund 3,058,700
Gas Utility Enterprise Fund 3,466,077
Solid Waste Utility Enterprise Fund 999,060
Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund 783,050
Nonmajor governmental funds 862,875
Nonmajor enterprise funds 869,494
Total10,657,902
Transfers to Capital Improvements Fund from:
General Fund 6,292,175
Special Development Fund 10,019,519
Nonmajor governmental funds 25,000
Internal service funds 193,726
Total16,530,420
Transfer to Water & Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund from:
Internal service funds 39,623
Transfer to Gas Utility Enterprise Fund from:
General Fund400,000
Transfers to Nonmajor governmental funds from:
General Fund 2,434,011
Nonmajor governmental funds 1,728,682
Internal service funds 22,366
Total4,185,059
Transfers to Internal service funds from:
General Fund 96,352
Capital Improvements Fund 638,212
Gas Utility Enterprise Fund 34,000
Solid Waste Utility Enterprise Fund 5,299
Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund 204,222
Nonmajor governmental funds 1,375,792
Total2,353,877
Total interfund transfers 34,166,881$
Attachment number 1 \nPage 72 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
61
Transfers are primarily used to 1) transfer revenues that have been collected in the required fund per state law to the funds
and activities that state law allows for expenditures; 2) transfer of “payment in lieu of taxes” contributions from the utility funds
to the General Fund; 3) transfer funding from governmental funds to debt service and capital improvements funds; and 4)
transfer matching funds from the General Fund to various grant programs.
Other non-routine interfund transfers occurring during the current fiscal year included a transfer of $1.8 million from the Gas
Fund to the General Fund representing an increase in the computed annual gas dividend payment, a transfer of $593
thousand from the Capital Improvement Fund to the General Fund due to completion of the Beach Recreation Center Boat
Ramp project, a transfer of $26 thousand from the Capital Improvement Fund to the General Fund due to completion of the
Carpenter Complex Clubhouse project, a transfer of $4 thousand from the Special Programs Fund to the General Fund due to
closure of the City Manager Flexibility Fund, a transfer of $21 thousand from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement
Fund to provide for the installation of an irrigation system in the medians on State Road 60, a transfer of $2.9 million to the
Capital Improvement Fund from the General Fund for Carpenter Complex/Bright House Field Improvements, a transfer of
$1.9 million to the Capital Improvement Fund for Airpark Runway/Taxiway Extension and Rehabilitation, a transfer of $200
thousand from General Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund to provide for gas main extensions, a transfer of $90 thousand
from the Parking Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund to complete the demolition and removal of the Mandalay Pier, a
transfer of $105 thousand from the Administrative Services Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund for the Citywide Camera
System project, a transfer of $130 thousand from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund for Main Library
Entryway Improvements, as transfer of $350 thousand for Carpenter/Bright House Field Improvements, a transfer of $100
thousand from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund for improvements at the North Greenwood Athletic Fields,
a transfer of $822 thousand from the Solid Waste Utility Fund for renovations at Philip Jones Park, and a transfer of $185
thousand from the Administrative Services Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund to fund a portion of the City Enterprise
Timekeeping System.
E. Leases
The City purchases various equipment for governmental and business-type activities under lease purchase financing
agreements. The equipment is purchased with cash and subsequently provided as collateral via a “lease purchase” financing
arrangement, typically for a five-year term. Obligations under these lease purchase agreements are recorded at the present
value of their future minimum lease payments as of date of inception. Purchase of the assets is recorded as a cash outflow
and the subsequent receipt of the financing proceeds is recorded as “proceeds from issuance of debt” for Statement of Cash
Flows reporting.
Capitalized equipment subject to lease purchase financing as of September 30, 2012:
GovernmentalBusiness-type
Activities Activities
Equipment16,362,697$ 1,300,182$
Less: Accumulated Depreciation(4,727,569) (320,386)
Total11,635,128$ 979,796$
Attachment number 1 \nPage 73 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
62
The future minimum lease payments under capital lease purchase agreements are as follows as of September 30, 2012:
GovernmentalBusiness-type
Year Ending Sept. 30 ActivitiesActivities
20133,032,741$ 272,797$
20142,456,270 227,439
20151,937,835 169,396
20161,342,732 100,930
2017726,350 35,553
201881,147 -
9,577,075 806,115
Deduction of the amount of imputed interest necessary to
reduce net minimum lease payments to present value
9,058,268$ 765,445$
(518,807) (40,670)
The City also leases personal computers under a three-year operating lease that is cancelable on an annual basis. Lease
payments for fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, totaled $327,519.
F. Long-term debt
1. Revenue Bonds
$14,810,000 in Spring Training Facility Revenue Bonds, Series 2002; issued to provide a
portion of the costs of the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation and equipping of a
spring training facility to the used by the Philadelphia Phillies major league baseball
team; serial bonds due in annual installments of $590,000 due March 1, 2013, to
$295,000 due March 1, 2022, with maximum principal of $845,000 due March 1, 2021;
interest at 3.70% to 5.375%; 5.375% term bonds in the amount of $1,730,000 due March
1, 2027; and 5.375% term bonds in the amount of $1,750,000 due March 1, 2031. $10,090,000
Total revenue bonds for governmental activities 10,090,000
$8,410,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2003; issued to
advance refund the City’s Water and Sewer Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 1993;
serial bonds due in annual installments of $215,000 at December 1, 2012, to $260,000
due December 1, 2018, interest at 3.30% to 4.00%. 1,635,000
$26,430,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2006; issued to pay the costs of
the design, acquisition, construction, or reconstruction of capital improvements to the
City’s water and sewer system; serial bonds due in annual installments of $1,410,000 at
December 1, 2019, to $2,070,000 due December 1, 2028, interest at 4.25% to 4.50%;
4.50% term bonds in the amount of $4,410,000 due December 1, 2030; and 4.625% term
bonds in the amount of $4,795,000 due December 1, 2032. 26,430,000
$67,715,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2009A; issued to pay the costs of
the design, acquisition, construction, or reconstruction of capital improvements to the
City’s water and sewer system; serial bonds due in annual installments of $420,000 at
December 1, 2019, to $495,000 due December 1, 2023; interest at 4.375% to 5.00%;
5.125% term bonds in the amount of $5,655,000 due December 1, 2032; and 5.25% term
bonds in the amount of $59,780,000 due December 1, 2039.
67,715,000
Attachment number 1 \nPage 74 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
63
$41,700,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2009B; issued to
advance refund the City’s Water and Sewer Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 1998;
serial bonds due in annual installments of $3,880,000 at December 1, 2012 to
$5,150,000 due December 1, 2018; interest at 5.00%. 31,280,000
$47,025,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2011; issued to
advance refund the City’s Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2002; serial bonds
due in annual installments of $1,370,000 at December 1, 2012, to $3,175,000 due
December 1, 2030, interest at 2.00% to 5.00%; 4.50% term bonds in the amount of
$6,850,000 due December 1, 2032. 47,025,000
$8,890,000 Gas System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2004; issued to advance
refund the City’s Gas System Revenue Bonds, Series 1996A; serial bonds due in annual
installments of $205,000 due September 1, 2013, to $1,575,000 due September 1, 2026,
interest at 3.20% to 4.375%.
7,475,000
$7,195,000 Gas System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2005; issued to partially
advance refund the City’s Gas System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1997A and
Series 1997B; serial bonds due in annual installments of $250,000 due September 1,
2013, to $325,000 due September 1, 2025, interest at 3.40% to 4.375%; and 4.375%
term bonds in the amount of $2,400,000 maturing on September 1, 2027. 5,780,000
$3,700,000 Gas System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2007; issued together with
other funds of the City to refund and redeem on December 1, 2007, all of the outstanding
principal amount of the City’s Gas System Revenue Bonds, Series 1998; serial bonds
due in equal annual installments of $370,000 due September 1, 2013, through
September 1, 2017; interest at 4.00%.
1,850,000
$14,430,000 Stormwater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2004; issued to finance the
costs of capital improvements to the City’s stormwater management system; serial bonds
due in annual installments of $380,000, due November 1, 2012, to $865,000 due
November 1, 2032, interest at 3.25% to 4.75%. 12,035,000
$6,925,000 Stormwater System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2005; issued to
partially advance refund the Stormwater Revenue Bonds, Series 1999; serial bonds due
in annual installments of $240,000 due November 1, 2012, to $470,000 due November 1,
2029, interest at 3.25% to 4.50%. 6,095,000
$19,365,000 Stormwater System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2012, issued to
advance refund the Stormwater Revenue Bonds, Series 2002; serial bonds due in annual
installments of $480,000 due November 1, 2012, to $1,350,000 due November 1, 2032,
interest at 2.00% to 5.00%. 19,365,000
Total revenue bonds for business-type activities 226,685,000
Total revenue bonds $236,775,000
Attachment number 1 \nPage 75 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
64
2. Restrictive covenants and collateral requirements
The Spring Training Facility Revenue Bonds are special, limited obligations of the City, payable solely from and secured by
a lien upon and pledge of the (i) payments received by the City from the State of Florida pursuant to Section 212.20,
Florida Statutes (State payments); and (ii) payments received by the City from Pinellas County, Florida pursuant to the
Interlocal Agreement dated December 1, 2000 (County payments). The pledge of the State Payments and County
Payments does not constitute a lien upon any property of the City. Furthermore, neither the City, Pinellas County, the State
of Florida, nor any political subdivision thereof has pledged its faith or credit or taxing power to the payment of the bonds.
The Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, and Series 2009A; and the Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding
Bonds, Series 2003, Series 2009B, and Series 2011; are limited obligations of the City payable solely from and secured by
a lien upon and pledge of the net revenues of the City’s water and sewer system (System). The pledge of the System’s net
revenues does not constitute a lien upon any property of the City. The covenants of the ordinances authorizing the bonds
include, among other things, an obligation of the City to fix and maintain such rates, and collect such fees, rentals and
other charges for the services and facilities of the System and revise the same from time to time whenever necessary,
which will provide gross revenues in each fiscal year sufficient to pay the cost of operation and maintenance of the system;
one hundred fifteen percent (115%) of the bond service requirement becoming due in such fiscal year on the outstanding
bonds; plus one hundred percent (100%) of all reserve and other payments required to be made pursuant to the
ordinances authorizing the bonds. The City further covenants that such rates, fees, rentals and other charges will not be
reduced so as to render them insufficient to provide gross revenues for such purpose.
The Gas System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2004, Series 2005, and Series 2007 are limited obligations of the City
payable solely from and secured by a lien upon and pledge of the net revenues of the City’s gas system (System). The
pledge of the System’s net revenues does not constitute a lien upon any property of the City. The covenants of the
ordinances authorizing the bonds include, among other things, an obligation of the City to fix, establish, revise from time to
time whenever necessary, maintain and collect always, such fees, rates, rentals and other charges for the use of the
product, services and facilities of the System which will always provide revenues in each year sufficient to pay, and out of
such funds pay, 100% of the cost of operations and maintenance of the system in such year and all reserve and other
payments provided for in the ordinances authorizing the bonds, along with one hundred twenty five percent (125%) of the
bond service requirement due in such year on all outstanding bonds.
The Stormwater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2004; and Stormwater Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2005 and
Series 2012, are limited obligations of the City payable solely from and secured by a lien upon and pledge of the net
revenues of the City’s stormwater management system (System). The pledge of the System’s net revenues does not
constitute a lien upon any property of the City. The covenants of the ordinances authorizing the bonds include, among
other things, an obligation of the City to fix, revise from time to time whenever necessary, and maintain and collect always
such fees, rates, rentals and other charges for use of the products, services, and facilities which will always provide net
revenues in each year sufficient to pay one hundred fifteen percent (115%) of the bond service requirement becoming due
in such fiscal year on the outstanding bonds. The City further covenants that such rates, fees, rentals and other charges
will not be reduced so as to render them insufficient to provide revenues for such purpose. Additionally, the covenants of
each of the above issues includes a “Reserve Requirement” equal to the lesser of: the Maximum Bond Service
Requirement for any given year; 125% of the Average Annual Bond Service Requirement; or the largest amount as shall
not adversely affect the exclusion of interest on the Bonds from gross income for Federal income tax purposes. A Reserve
Fund has been funded for the Series 2004 and Series 2012 Bonds while the Series 2005 Reserve Requirements has been
satisfied with Reserve Fund Surety Bonds.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 76 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
65
Annual debt service requirements to maturity for revenue bonds are as follows:
Year Ending
September 30 PrincipalInterestPrincipalInterest
2013590,000$ 485,096$ 7,390,000$ 10,374,698$
2014610,000 462,774 7,855,000 10,079,019
2015635,000 438,606 8,130,000 9,757,011
2016660,000 412,376 8,520,000 9,401,434
20173,820,000 1,506,116 8,880,000 9,022,910
2018-20221,640,000 802,567 36,690,000 39,506,845
2023-20272,135,000 298,447 40,245,000 31,615,229
2028-2032- - 40,270,000 22,333,025
2033-2037- - 40,380,000 12,698,738
2038-2042- - 28,325,000 2,282,569
2043-2047- - - -
Totals10,090,000$ 4,405,982$ 226,685,000$ 157,071,478$
Business-type ActivitiesGovernmental Activities
3. Pledged revenues
State of Florida and Pinellas County Payments Pledged: The City has pledged future revenues derived from payments
received from the State of Florida pursuant to Section 212.20, Florida Statutes, and payments from Pinellas County,
Florida pursuant to an Interlocal Agreement, together with any investment income earned on the revenues, to repay $14.8
million in Spring Training Facility Revenue bonds issued in September 2002. Proceeds from the bonds provided financing
for a portion of the costs of the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, and equipping of a spring training facility to be used
by the Philadelphia Phillies major league baseball team. The bonds are payable solely from the State of Florida and
Pinellas County, Florida payments and are payable through March 2031. Annual principal and interest payments on the
bonds are expected to require less than 100 percent of net revenues. The total principal and interest remaining to be paid
on the bonds is $14,495,982. Principal and interest paid for the current year and total revenue received were $1,075,986
and $1,097,586, respectively.
Water and Sewer Utility Net Revenues Pledged: The City has pledged future net revenues of the City of Clearwater,
Florida, Water & Sewer Utility defined as all income or earnings, including any income from the investment of funds,
derived by the City from the operation of the utility after deduction of current expenses for the operation, maintenance and
repair of the system, but not including reserves for renewals and replacements, for extraordinary repairs or any allowance
for depreciation to repay:
$8.4 million in Water & Sewer Revenue Refunding bonds issued in October 2003. Proceeds from the bonds provided
financing to refund and redeem the City’s then outstanding Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1993. The
bonds are payable solely from the Water and Sewer Utility net revenues and are payable through December 2018.
$26.4 million in Water & Sewer Revenue bonds issued in August 2006. Proceeds from the bonds provided financing for the
costs of design, acquisition, construction or reconstruction of capital improvements to the City’s water and sewer system.
The bonds are payable solely from the Water and Sewer Utility net revenues and are payable through December 2032.
$67.7 million in Water & Sewer Revenue bonds issued in May 2009. Proceeds from the bonds provided financing for the
costs of design, acquisition, construction or reconstruction of capital improvements to the City’s water and sewer system.
The bonds are payable solely from the Water and Sewer Utility net revenues and are payable through December 2039.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 77 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
66
$41.7 million in Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding bonds issued in May 2009. Proceeds from the bonds provided
financing to refund and redeem the City’s then outstanding Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1998. The
bonds are payable solely from the Water and Sewer Utility net revenues and are payable through December 2018.
$47.0 million in Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding bonds issued in September 2011. Proceeds from the bonds
provided financing to refund and redeem the outstanding principal maturing after December 1, 2011 of the City’s Water and
Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2002.
Annual principal and interest payments on the bonds are expected to require less than 85 percent of net revenues. The
total principal and interest remaining to be paid on the bonds is $307,786,236. Principal and interest paid for the current
year and total net revenue were $13,197,593 and $25,891,515, respectively.
Stormwater Utility Net Revenues Pledged: The City has pledged future net revenues of the City of Clearwater, Florida,
Stormwater Utility defined as all income or earnings, including any income from the investment of funds, derived by the City
from the operation of the utility after deduction of current expenses for the operation, maintenance and repair of the
system, but not including reserves for renewals and replacements, for extraordinary repairs or any allowance for
depreciation to repay:
$14.4 million in Stormwater Revenue bonds issued in September 2004. Proceeds from the bonds provided financing to
make capital improvements to the City’s stormwater management system. The bonds are payable solely from the
Stormwater Utility net revenues and are payable through November 2032.
$6.9 million in Stormwater Revenue Refunding bonds issued in May 2005. Proceeds from the bonds provided sufficient
funds to be available on November 1, 2008 to pay and redeem the City’s outstanding Stormwater Revenue Bonds, Series
1999. The bonds are payable solely from the Stormwater Utility net revenues and are payable through November 2029.
$19.4 million in Stormwater Revenue Refunding bonds issued in 2012. Proceeds from the bonds provided sufficient funds
to be available on March 5, 2012 to pay and redeem the City’s outstanding Stormwater Revenue Bonds, Series 2002. The
bonds are payable solely from the Stormwater Utility net revenues and are payable through November 2032.
Annual principal and interest payments on the bonds are expected to require less than 60 percent of net revenues. The
total principal and interest remaining to be paid on the bonds is $54,971,094. Principal and interest paid for the current year
and total net revenue were $2,703,792 and $7,883,795, respectively. An additional $20,295,000 of principal was paid to
defease the 2002 bonds effective February 2, 2012.
Gas System Utility Net Revenues Pledged: The City has pledged future net revenues of the City of Clearwater, Florida,
Gas System Utility defined as all income or earnings, including any income from the investment of funds, derived by the
City from the operation of the utility after deduction of current expenses for the operation, maintenance and repair of the
system, but not including reserves for renewals and replacements, for extraordinary repairs or any allowance for
depreciation to repay:
$8.9 million in Gas System Revenue Refunding bonds issued in February 2004. Proceeds from the bonds provided
financing to advance refund the outstanding principal of the City of Clearwater Gas System Revenue Bonds, Series 1996A.
The bonds are payable solely from the Gas System Utility net revenues and are payable through September 2026.
$7.2 million in Gas System Revenue Refunding bonds issued in June 2005. Proceeds from the bonds provided financing to
advance refund the outstanding principal of the City of Clearwater Gas System Revenue Bonds, Series 1997A. The bonds
are payable solely from the Gas System Utility net revenues and are payable through September 2027.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 78 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
67
$3.7 million in Gas System Revenue Refunding bonds issued in October 2007. Proceeds from the bonds provided
financing to refund the outstanding principal of the City of Clearwater Gas System Revenue Bonds, Series 1998. The
bonds are payable solely from the Gas System Utility net revenues and are payable through September 2017.
Annual principal and interest payments on the bonds are expected to require less than 60 percent of net revenues. The
total principal and interest remaining to be paid on the bonds is $20,999,148. Principal and interest paid for the current year
and total net revenue were $1,444,301 and $11,996,510, respectively.
4. Advance refunding of bonds
On February 2, 2012 the City issued $19,365,000 at par value of Stormwater System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series
2012, to redeem, effective March 5, 2012, $20,295,000 principal of Stormwater Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, maturing after
November 1, 2011. The City paid a 1% call premium in the amount of $202,950. This refunding transaction resulted in an
aggregate debt service reduction of $4,211,598 and a net present value savings of $2,936,083.
There was no outstanding principal on refunded bonds as of September 30, 2012.
5. Changes in long-term liabilities
BeginningEndingDue Within
Balance Additions Reductions Balance One Year
Governmental activities:
Revenue bonds payable10,660,000$ -$ (570,000)$ 10,090,000$ 590,000$
Add (subtract) deferred amounts:
For issuance premiums (discounts) 236,116 - (25,858) 210,258 -
Net revenue bonds payable10,896,116 - (595,858) 10,300,258 590,000
Lease purchase contracts (a)8,722,210 3,257,919 (2,921,861) 9,058,268 2,813,490
Compensated absences (b)7,283,234 4,600,734 (4,394,790) 7,489,178 4,599,785
Other postemployment benefits (c)4,746,443 1,804,495 (797,246) 5,753,692 -
Claims payable (d)8,688,000 3,377,406 (2,642,406) 9,423,000 2,439,700
Governmental activity
Long-term liabilities40,336,003$ 13,040,554$ (11,352,161)$ 42,024,396$ 10,442,975$
Business-type activities:
Revenue bonds payable234,755,000$ 19,365,000$ (27,435,000)$ 226,685,000$ 7,390,000$
Less deferred amounts:
For issuance premiums (discounts) 3,157,535 1,120,575 (506,200) 3,771,910 -
On refunding(5,103,157) (628,886) 816,745 (4,915,298) -
Net revenue bonds payable232,809,378 19,856,689 (27,124,455) 225,541,612 7,390,000
Lease purchase contracts807,879 203,950 (246,384) 765,445 253,599
Compensated absences (b)1,801,023 1,013,676 (1,040,899) 1,773,800 1,089,451
Other postemployment benefits1,856,107 839,943 (371,096) 2,324,954 -
Unearned revenue187,113 - - 187,113 -
Business-type activity
Long-term liabilities237,461,500$ 21,914,258$ (28,782,834)$ 230,592,924$ 8,733,050$
Attachment number 1 \nPage 79 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
68
(a) Governmental activities lease purchase contract additions of $3,257,919 includes $2,944,115 attributable to internal
service funds and $313,804 attributable to governmental funds. The lease purchase contracts reduction of $2,921,861
includes $2,443,092 for internal service funds and $478,769 for governmental funds.
(b) Compensated absences are paid by the fund where salaries are incurred, which is primarily the General Fund for
governmental activities.
(c) Since the plan’s inception in fiscal 2008, other postemployment benefits costs are allocated to and paid by funds based
on their percentage of full time equivalent employees, which is primarily the General Fund for governmental activities.
(d) The Central Insurance Fund, an internal service fund, accrues for estimated claims and pays claims for all
departments.
G. Restricted assets
Restricted assets are classified as current or noncurrent on the Statement of Net Assets on the basis of the underlying
liabilities payable from the restricted assets.
1. Water and Sewer Utility Fund
Assets in the Water and Sewer Utility Fund restricted for construction include:
Water Improvement charges, the use of which is restricted by the authorizing ordinance to the
construction of additions to the water system; assets remaining at September 30, 2012, are:
Cash and Investments $ 1,593,522
Sewer Improvement charges, the use of which is restricted by the authorizing ordinance to the
construction of additions to the sewer system; assets remaining at September 30, 2012, are:
Cash and Investments 5,737,403
Assets of the Water and Sewer Utility Fund restricted under the provisions of the ordinances authorizing
the issuance of Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds consisted of the following at September 30, 2012:
Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds Debt Service:
Cash and Investments 21,167,560
Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds Renewals and Replacements:
Cash and Investments 16,499,691
Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds Construction:
Cash and Investments 2,230,179
Assets of the Water and Sewer Utility Fund consisting of amounts Due from Other Governments for
advances to the Florida Department of Transportation for utility relocations related to improvements to
State Road 55 (U. S. Highway 19) 655,821
Assets of the Water and Sewer Utility Fund representing Customers' Deposits and therefore restricted,
consisting entirely of Cash and Investments at September 30, 2012 2,774,736
Total restricted assets – Water and Sewer Utility Fund $50,658,912
Attachment number 1 \nPage 80 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
69
2. Gas Utility Fund
Assets in the Gas Utility Fund restricted under the provisions of the ordinance authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds
consisted of the following at September 30, 2012:
Gas System Revenue Bonds
Debt Service:
Cash and Investments $ 120,463
Renewals and Replacements:
Cash and Investments 300,000
Assets of the Gas Utility Fund representing Customers' Deposits at September 30, 2012:
Cash and Investments 2,754,000
Total restricted assets – Gas Utility Fund $ 3,174,463
3. Solid Waste Utility Fund
Restricted assets in the Solid Waste Utility Fund represent customer deposits in the amount of $1,058,368 at September 30,
2012, and consisted entirely of Cash and Investments.
4. Stormwater Utility Fund
Assets restricted under the provisions of the ordinances for the issuance of revenue bonds consisted of
the following at September 30, 2012:
Stormwater Revenue Bonds – Series 2004
Debt Service: Cash and Investments $ 1,469,380
Stormwater Revenue Refunding Bonds – Series 2005
Debt Service: Cash and Investments 323,693
Stormwater Refunding Revenue Bonds – Series 2012
Debt Service: Cash and Investments 2,093,656
Fees received in lieu of on-site drainage retention for new or improved businesses within the
Prospect Lake Drainage District, restricted for stormwater improvements, at September 30, 2012:
Cash and Investments 314,981
Total restricted assets – Stormwater Utility Fund $ 4,201,710
5. Parking System Fund
Assets in the Parking System restricted under the provisions of a development agreement between
L.O.M., Inc. and the City of Clearwater as of September 30, 2012:
Equity in Pooled Cash and Investments $ 9,300,000
Total restricted assets – Parking System Fund $ 9,300,000
Attachment number 1 \nPage 81 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
70
H. Fund Balances Classification
SpecialCapitalNon-Major
GeneralDevelopmentImprovementGovernmental
FundFundFundFunds
Non Spendable:
Inventories$25,005 $- $- $-
Prepaid items- - - 87,329
Restricted for:
General government- - 169,285 281,844
Public safety- - 7,339,004 1,874,925
Physical environment- 85,538 646,527 1,021,461
Transportation - 1,082,019 14,265,450 -
Economic environment- - - 28,308,836
Human services- - - 363,557
Culture and recreation- 162,507 7,456,686 169,567
Debt service reserve- - - 562,730
Infrastructure capital projects- 1,855,202 - -
Committed to:
General government- - 3,040,546 295,207
Public safety- - 782,838 3,233,254
Physical environment- - 700,671 -
Transportation- 199,345 5,409,229 -
Economic environment- - - 47,770
Human services- - - 939
Culture and recreation- - 3,413,906 222,527
Assigned to:
General government255,408 - - 275,195
Public safety295,228 - - 1,628,005
Physical environment- - - 487,134
Transportation28,905 - - -
Economic environment66,850 - - 664,490
Human services- - - 173,828
Culture and recreation396,567 20,004 51,502 186,989
Infrastructure capital projects- 5,000,120 - -
Unassigned 22,033,623 - - (2,118,634)
Total Fund Balances$23,101,586 $8,404,735 $43,275,644 $37,766,953
Note IV - Other Information
A. Risk management
The City is self-insured within certain parameters for losses arising from claims for general liability, auto liability, police
professional liability, public official’s liability, property damage, and workers' compensation. Insurance coverage has been
maintained by the City to pay for or indemnify the City for losses in excess of certain specific retentions and up to specified
maximum limits in the case of claims for liability, property damage, and workers' compensation. The liability excess
coverage is $7,000,000 per occurrence ($14,000,000 aggregate) with self-insured retention of $500,000. There is workers’
compensation coverage to the statutory limit, with self-insured retention of $500,000. The property damage excess
coverage is $50,000,000 per occurrence after either a $100,000 self-insured retention for perils other than a named storm
or 5% self-insured retention for named storm with a $500,000 minimum. Settled claims have not exceeded excess
coverage in any of the past three years.
The transactions relating to the self-insurance program are accounted for in the Central Insurance Fund, an internal service
fund. The billings by the Central Insurance Fund to the various operating funds (the interfund premiums) are based on
Attachment number 1 \nPage 82 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
71
actuarial estimates of the amounts needed to pay prior and current year claims. The claims liability reported at September
30, 2012, is based on the requirements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 10, which requires
that a liability for claims be reported if information prior to the issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is
probable that a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss can be
reasonably estimated.
Changes in the claims liability amounts in fiscal years 2011 and 2012 were:
Self
Insurance
Balance at September 30, 20108,095,000$
Current year claims and changes in estimates3,613,433
Claim payments(3,020,433)
Balance at September 30, 20118,688,000
Current year claims and changes in estimates3,377,406
Claim payments(2,642,406)
Balance at September 30, 20129,423,000$
B. Statements of cash flows
For purposes of the statements of cash flows, investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered to
meet the definition of cash equivalents. The majority of the investments in which the City's proprietary funds have equity are
held by the City's consolidated pool of cash and investments. Since fund equities in this cash management pool have the
general characteristics of demand deposits in that additional funds may be deposited at any time and also funds may be
withdrawn at any time without prior notice or penalty, each fund's equity account is considered a cash equivalent regardless of
the maturities of investments held by the pool. Funds with deficit (overdraft) positions within the consolidated pool report the
deficits as interfund payables to the City's Capital Improvement Fund.
C. Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from the estimates.
D. Employee retirement systems and pension plans
1. Defined benefit pension plans
The City contributes to two separate single-employer, self-administered defined benefit pension plans covering approximately
three-fourths of all City employees. The Employees' Pension Plan covers all permanent, full-time City employees who
successfully pass the required physical examination, except for firefighters employed prior to July 1, 1963, and certain
unclassified (primarily managerial) employees. The Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan covered eligible firefighters hired
prior to July 1, 1963, and is closed to new entrants. Neither of these plans issues a stand-alone financial report. As indicated,
both plans are self-administered, and the administrative costs of the plans are financed from the respective plan assets.
Benefits and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the terms of both plans.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 83 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
72
The Employees' Pension Plan is authorized by and operates under the provisions of Sections 2.391 through 2.411 of the
Municipal Code of the City of Clearwater. Plan provisions have been duly approved as required by the voters in referendums.
There were no changes in plan provisions or actuarial assumptions for the current year. The normal retirement benefit is a
monthly benefit equal to 2.75% of average monthly compensation for the highest five of the final ten years of service
multiplied by the number of years of service to date of retirement. The minimum benefit under the plan is $300 per month.
Eligibility for normal retirement occurs upon completion of at least 10 years of service and the attainment of age 65, or
completion of at least 20 years of service and the attainment of age 55, or completion of 30 years of service regardless of
age, for employees engaged in non-hazardous duty. For those engaged in hazardous duty, eligibility occurs upon completion
of 20 years of service. The normal monthly benefits are payable for the life of the participant and continue, after the
participant's death, to be paid at the same amount for 5 years to eligible surviving beneficiaries; after 5 years, the survivor
annuity is reduced to 50% of the original amount. The plan provides for an annual cost of living increase of up to 1.5%. The
plan also provides for disability and death benefits, vesting after completion of 10 years of service and the refund of employee
contributions in case of a non-vested termination. There are seven other benefit payment options that are computed to be the
actuarial equivalent of the normal benefit. Covered employees contribute 8% of their compensation. It is the City's obligation
to provide a sufficient additional contribution to maintain the actuarial soundness of the fund but, in any event, not less than
7% of participating employee’s compensation per the ordinance governing the plan.
The Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan is authorized and operated under the provisions of Subpart B, Article I (Laws
of Florida, Chapter 30658, 1955 and amendments), Sections 1 through 27 of the Municipal Charter and Related Law of the
City of Clearwater and Chapter 26, Article III, Sections 26.50 through 26.52 of the Municipal Code of the City of Clearwater.
Since the last actuarial valuation as of January 1, 2010, the investment yield assumption was lowered from 4.5% to 3.5%.
There have been no other changes to the actuarial assumptions. The normal retirement benefit is a monthly benefit in the
amount of 50% of the prevailing wage at the date of retirement of the lowest rank held by the participant during the three
years immediately preceding retirement plus 2% of such prevailing wage for each year of service in excess of 20 years up
to a maximum of 60%. Participants retiring at the age of 65 years are entitled to a benefit of 60% of the prevailing wage of
the lowest rank held by the participant during the three years immediately preceding retirement. The ending rate of pay
specified above may not exceed the highest rate of pay for the rank of Captain. Eligibility for normal retirement occurs upon
completion of 20 years of service or attainment of age 65. The monthly benefits are payable for the life of the participant
and continue, after the participant's death, to be paid to certain eligible surviving beneficiaries at an amount that is one-half
of the amount received by the participant. Benefits are also provided for children of the deceased participant who are less
than 18 years of age subject to certain limitations as to amount. The plan also provides for disability and death benefits and
for vesting upon completion of at least 12 years of service. The plan provides for post retirement cost of living increases
equal to the increase in the prevailing wage for the rank at which the participant retired with a limitation for those retiring on
or after January 1, 1972, of 100% of the initial pension benefit for total cost of living increases. Participating employees are
required to contribute 6% of their salaries up to the equivalent of the salary of a fireman holding the rank of Captain.
Effective with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, the Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan, with no remaining active
members (only retirees), is fully funded per the requirements of the governing Ordinance. The City may elect to contribute
should future valuations show an actuarial need for such.
As of the most recent actuarial valuation date, January 1, 2012 for both the Employees’ Pension Plan and the Firefighters’
Relief and Pension Plan, the membership of the plans was as follows:
Employees'Firefighter's Relief
Pension Planand Pension Plan
Retirees and beneficiaries currently receiving benefits101032
Terminated employees entitled to benefits but not yet receiving them62-
Active employees1,468-
Total number of participants2,54032
Attachment number 1 \nPage 84 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
73
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, the covered payroll for the Employees' Pension Fund was $69,798,379. The
City's total payroll for the same period was $82,771,355. Annual pension cost and contributions information for the last three
fiscal years for both the Employees’ Pension Plan and the Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan follows:
Employees’ Pension Plan
EndedPensionEmployer PercentPension
Sept 30 Cost (a)Contributions (b)ContributedAsset
201022,799,051$ 15,886,314$ 70%8,414,390$
201118,730,913$ 17,428,806$ 93%7,112,283$
201218,353,146$ 17,809,019$ 97%6,568,156$
(a) The actuarially determined contribution requirements for the City’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, are based on
actuarial valuations as of January 1, 2011. Since the City’s contributions are made during its fiscal year (which
commences nine months after the date of the actuarial valuation), the City, with approval of State regulatory authorities, is
following the practice of adding interest to its required contributions at the assumed rate of return on investments for a
period of one year.
(b) The employer contribution is less than the annual pension cost due to a “drawdown” of the net pension asset. The net
pension asset is the result of legally required contributions in excess of actuarially required contributions in prior years.
Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan
Year Annual
EndedPensionEmployerPercent
Sept 30CostContributionsContributed
2010-$ -$ -
2011-$ -$ -
2012-$ -$ -
Effective with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, the Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan, with no remaining active
members (only retirees), was fully funded per the requirements of the governing Ordinance. The City may elect to contribute
should future biennial valuations show an actuarial need for such.
The Employees’ Pension Plan net pension asset at September 30, 2012, totaled $6,568,156. It was comprised of the
following components:
Annual required contributions (ARC) 18,014,403$
Interest on the net pension asset(533,421)
Adjustment to annual contribution872,164
Annual pension cost 18,353,146
Fiscal 2012 employer contributions 17,809,019
Decrease in net pension asset(544,127)
Net pension asset beginning of year7,112,283
Net pension asset end of year6,568,156$
Attachment number 1 \nPage 85 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
74
The net pension asset for the Employees’ Pension Plan, representing excess contributions as calculated per GASB 27
requirements, is identical in amount to the plan “credit balance” as disclosed in prior years. A total of $4,556,712 of the
current net pension asset balance is attributable to governmental funds and therefore is not reflected in the governmental
fund financial statements in accordance with the modified accrual basis of accounting. The remaining $2,011,444
attributable to proprietary funds is reflected in the proprietary fund financial statements on the accrual basis of accounting.
Each pension fund is accounted for as a pension trust fund; therefore each is accounted for in substantially the same manner
as proprietary funds with an economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Fund assets,
primarily investments, are valued at fair value for balance sheet purposes, in accordance with GASB No. 25. Investment
values are determined using the estimated fair value determined by averaging estimated fair values obtained from three or
more nationally recognized brokers.
The Employees’ Pension Plan has invested in real estate and timber limited partnership funds. The strategies of these
funds are long term and illiquid in nature. As a result, investors are subject to redemption restrictions which generally limit
distributions and restrict the ability of limited partners to exit a partnership investment prior to its dissolution. These
investments partnerships are valued using their respective net asset value (NAV), and are audited annually. The most
significant input into the NAV of such an entity is the fair value of its investment holdings. These holdings are valued by the
general partners on a quarterly or semi-annual basis, in conjunction with management and investment advisors, and
consultation with valuation specialists. The management assumptions are based upon the nature of the investment and the
underlying business. The valuation techniques vary based upon investment type and involve a certain degree of expert
judgment. All timber acquisitions are valued per an independent expert third party appraisal within one year of acquisition
and similar independent third party appraisals of fair value are conducted at least every three years thereafter.
As of September 30, 2012, neither the Employees' Pension Plan nor the Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan held
investments (other than U.S. Government or U.S. Government guaranteed obligations) in any one organization comprising
5% or more of the net assets available for benefits.
Significant actuarial assumptions utilized in the most recent actuarial valuation date, January 1, 2012 for both the
Employees’ Pension Plan and the Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan, are as follows:
Employees' Pension Plan
(1) Assumed rate of return on investments of 7.5%, before investment expenses.
(2) Projected salary increase at a rate of 6% per year, including both cost-of-living adjustments of 3% and merit or
seniority increases at 3%.
(3) Mortality based on the RP 2000 Combined Healthy Mortality Table.
(4) Pre-retirement withdrawals assumed to occur in accordance with a table of declining withdrawal rates for
hazardous and non-hazardous duty categories.
(5) Pre-retirement incidence of disability is assumed to occur in accordance with a standard scale of moderate
disability rates (Class 1, 1952 Inter-Company); rates for females assumed to be twice that for males.
Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan
(1) Assumed rate of return on investments of 3.5%.
(2) Assumed benefits grow at an annually compounded rate of 2%. There are no longer any active members in this
plan.
(3) Mortality based on the 1994 Unisex Mortality Table for retired participants; assumed disabled participants will
experience mortality according to PBGC Tables 3 and 4 for males and females, respectively.
(4) Assumed no withdrawals will occur.
(5) Assumed probability of an active participant becoming disabled is zero (no active participants).
(6) Assumed value of one mill of ad valorem tax will increase at rate of 5% per year.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 86 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
75
It is the City's policy to fund pension costs accrued as determined on an actuarial basis. Annual required contributions
(ARC) for the Employees' Pension Plan are calculated using the Entry Age Normal with Frozen Initial Liability method. The
initial unfunded actuarial accrued liability determined at July 1, 1963, was amortized over a 40-year period; changes made
in 1979 and subsequent years, which have had the effect of either increasing or decreasing the actuarial liability, are being
amortized over a 30-year period from their effective dates in accordance with State law. The amortization method is level
dollar closed.
Annual required contributions (ARC) for the Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Fund are based on a variation of the
aggregate actuarial cost method, under which the unfunded portion of the present value of the projected benefits is
allocated over the present value of a 6.0% per year increasing annuity for the remaining years in the 35-year funding
period which began January 1, 1972, pursuant to an agreement between the City and the Plan participants. For this
purpose, the unfunded actuarial liability is determined after consideration of the available assets at the valuation date. The
increasing fixed schedule produced by this method was established in 1988 and will be modified in the future only to the
extent that a current valuation indicates a higher required cost level, or if the resulting cost level exceeds 60% of a mill in a
current year. Since the plan currently has only inactive members, the funding method could be presently be described as
either aggregate or entry-age normal, both of which normally converge after the end of the active participant phase. Under
the non-standard cost method used for funding of this plan, all liabilities are unfunded actuarial liabilities and are being
amortized according to the closed cost method. This method does not identify or separately amortize unfunded actuarial
accrued liabilities, consequently information about funded status and funding progress is presented using the entry age
actuarial cost method. This information is intended to serve as a surrogate for the funded status and the funding progress
of the plan.
As of January 1, 2012, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the Employees’ Pension Plan was 97.4 percent funded.
The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $681.9 million, and the actuarial value of assets was $664.1 million, resulting
in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) of $17.8 million. The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees
covered by the plan) was $74.8 million, and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 23.8 percent.
As of January 1, 2012, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan was 112.0
percent funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $5.7 million, and the actuarial value of assets was $6.3
million, resulting in $682 thousand of funding in excess of the actuarial accrued liability. The covered payroll was $-0- with
no active employees covered.
The Schedules of Funding Progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial
statements, present multiyear trend information regarding the change in the actuarial value of plan assets versus the
actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits over time. Also included as required supplementary information following the notes
to the financial statement, per Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement Nos. 25 and 27, are the Schedules of
Employer Contributions, which provide similar multiyear trend information on required employer contributions versus the
actual amount contributed.
2. Police Supplemental Pension Fund
A supplemental defined contribution pension plan exists for all eligible policemen, which is funded by earmarked revenues
received from the State and is administered by the Board of the Police Supplemental Pension Plan. The revenues received
from the State are allocated among eligible police officers on the basis of days employed as Clearwater Police Officers.
These revenues received from the State of Florida “on-behalf” of the City’s employees, which comprise the plan
contributions, totaled $819,117 for the year ended September 30, 2012, and are obtained from an eighty-five one
hundredths of one percent (0.85%) excise tax on the gross receipts from premiums collected on casualty insurance
policies covering property within the City's corporate limits. These monies were recognized as General Fund revenues and
General Fund police department expenditures in the current year. The current year contributions represent 4.5% of current
year covered payroll. The fair value of cash and investments at September 30, 2012, totaled $14,929,407.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 87 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
76
The Police Supplemental Pension Fund is authorized by and operates under the provisions of Sections 2.471 through 2.480
of the Municipal Code of the City of Clearwater and Chapter 185 of Florida Statutes. Under the plan provisions, the total
monies received during each fiscal year, after payment or provision for all costs and expenses of management and operation
of the plan, are allocated to participants on the basis of the total number of shares to which each participant is entitled. Each
participant is entitled to one share in the fund for each day of service as a police officer of the City.
All police officers, as defined in Section 26.70(g) of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Clearwater, who are elected,
appointed, or employed full-time by the City are eligible to participate in the plan. There are no employee contributions to
the supplemental plan. Benefits are fully vested for a lump sum distribution after twenty years from the date of hire, with
provision for partial vesting after ten or more years under the plan. Accumulated benefits are payable in full in case of
death while employed by the City or in case of total and permanent job-related disability. Non-vested participants' account
values upon termination of employment during any fiscal year are added to the monies received during that fiscal year for
allocation to the remaining participants in the plan on the basis of total days worked.
Plan assets, primarily investments, are valued at fair value for balance sheet purposes, in accordance with GASB No. 25.
Investment values are determined using the estimated fair value determined by averaging estimated fair values obtained
from three or more nationally recognized brokers.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, the payroll of the covered officers’ was $18,554,670; the City's total payroll for
the same period was $82,771,355.
Since the entitlement to benefits is based entirely upon the allocation of monies received by the plan to the participants' share
accounts, there is no actuarial liability on the part of either the State or the City.
3. Firefighters Supplemental Pension Fund
A supplemental defined contribution pension plan exists for all eligible firefighters, which is funded by earmarked revenues
received from the State and is administered by the Board of the Clearwater Firefighters Supplemental Pension Plan. The
revenues received from the State are allocated among eligible firefighters on the basis of days worked during the previous
year. These revenues received from the State of Florida “on-behalf” of the City’s employees, which comprise the plan
contributions, amounted to $1,179,573 in the year ended September 30, 2012, and are obtained from a one and eighty-five
one hundredths percent (1.85%) excise tax on the gross receipts from premiums collected on property insurance policies
covering property within the City's corporate limits. These monies were recognized as General Fund revenues and General
Fund fire department expenditures in the current year. The contributions represent 9.2% of current year covered payroll. The
fair value of cash and investments at September 30, 2012, totaled $12,548,828.
As the plan is described as a money purchase pension plan, whereby contributions are allocated based on the number of
days worked during the fiscal year ended September 30, and interest earnings allocated based on the beginning balances
in each participant's account, there is no actuarial liability on the part of the State or the City.
The Firefighters Supplemental Pension Fund is authorized by and operates under the provisions of Sections 2.441 through
2.450 of the Municipal Code of the City of Clearwater and Chapter 175 of Florida Statutes. Eligibility requires two years of
credited calendar year service as a firefighter with concurrent participation in the Employees' Pension Plan. There is no
employee contribution to the supplemental plan, and benefits are vested for a lump sum distribution at ten years unless
there is early retirement, disability or death. Non-vested participants' account values upon termination of employment are
reallocated among the remaining participants on the basis of days worked during the previous year.
Plan assets, primarily investments, are valued at fair value for balance sheet purposes, in accordance with GASB No. 25.
Investment values are determined using the estimated fair value determined by averaging estimated fair values obtained
from three or more nationally recognized brokers.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, the covered payroll was $12,864,475; the City's total payroll for the same
period was $82,771,355.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 88 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
77
4. Pension Plan Financial Statements
Separate financial statements are provided in the Notes per the guidance of GASB Statement No. 34 as follows:
Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets:Defined BenefitDefined Contribution
Pension Trust FundsPension Trust Funds
PoliceFirefighters
Employees'Firefighters'SupplementalSupplemental
ASSETS
Cash and investments$2,707,983 $2,713,437 $819,988 $-
Managed investment accounts, at fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents19,123,176 - 151,634 378,215
Government bonds42,960,243 - 2,942,887 498,601
Agency bonds10,779,151 3,222,474 642,556 -
Domestic corporate bonds72,998,283 - 1,215,322 3,577,490
International equity securities60,027,026 - - -
Domestic stocks264,952,603 - 7,721,708 2,129,768
Mortgage backed bonds55,656,320 - 1,739 1,411,600
Asset backed securities1,386,427 - - -
Domestic equity mutual funds94,454,202 - - 2,971,596
International equity mutual fund38,990,976 - 2,253,561 1,581,558
Real estate34,336,944 - - -
Total managed investment accounts695,665,351 3,222,474 14,929,407 12,548,828
Securities lending collateral131,525,918 - - -
Receivables:
Interest and dividends1,858,102 43,595 51,767 59,856
Unsettled investment sales21,900,109 - - -
Securities lending earnings33,298 - - -
Total receivables23,791,509 43,595 51,767 59,856
Total assets 853,690,761 5,979,506 15,801,162 12,608,684
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable 725,350 - - -
Unsettled investment purchases10,344,475 - - -
Obligations under securities lending131,525,918 - - -
Total liabilities142,595,743 - - -
NET ASSETS
Net assets held in trust for pension benefits$711,095,018 $5,979,506 $15,801,162 $12,608,684
Attachment number 1 \nPage 89 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
78
Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Assets:Defined BenefitDefined Contribution
Pension Trust FundsPension Trust Funds
PoliceFirefighters
Employees'Firefighters'SupplementalSupplemental
ADDITIONS
Contributions:
Contributions from employer$18,030,265 $- $- $-
Contributions from employer - state tax12,000 - 819,117 1,179,573
Contributions from employees5,807,091 - - -
Total contributions23,849,356 - 819,117 1,179,573
Investment income (loss):
Net appreciation (depreciation) in
fair value of investments105,446,690 9,649 2,132,662 1,392,093
Interest7,676,310 211,218 173,643 227,246
Dividends6,550,007 - 226,128 72,499
119,673,007 220,867 2,532,433 1,691,838
Less investment expenses:
Investment management / custodian fees3,408,690 5,298 83,605 71,823
Net income (loss) from investing activities 116,264,317 215,569 2,448,828 1,620,015
Securities lending income:
Gross earnings412,642 - - -
Rebate received350,324 - - -
Bank fees(266,870) - - -
Net income from securities lending 496,096 - - -
Total additions (losses)140,609,769 215,569 3,267,945 2,799,588
DEDUCTIONS
Benefits and withdrawal payments:
Benefits32,707,456 680,500 1,061,191 470,206
Withdrawal payments565,865 - - -
Total benefits and withdrawal payments33,273,321 680,500 1,061,191 470,206
Income (loss) before administrative expenses107,336,448 (464,931) 2,206,754 2,329,382
Administrative expenses232,286 - 7,633 12,809
Net increase (decrease)107,104,162 (464,931) 2,199,121 2,316,573
Net assets held in trust for pension benefits:
Beginning of year603,990,856 6,444,437 13,602,041 10,292,111
End of year$711,095,018 $5,979,506 $15,801,162 $12,608,684
5. 401(a) defined contribution plan
For all management employees not covered under either of the defined benefit pension plans, the City provides pension
benefits through a 401(a) defined contribution plan. In a defined contribution plan, benefits depend solely on amounts
contributed to the plan plus investment earnings. Employees are participants from the date of employment and are fully
vested upon enrollment. The plan is totally contributory on the part of the City in an amount equal to 15% of compensation
on behalf of the City Manager and the City Attorney; 14% of compensation on behalf of the Chief of Police; and 8% of
compensation on behalf of all other management contract employees and Assistant City Attorneys. The City makes bi-
weekly contributions to the Trust throughout the plan year to meet its funding obligations under the plan. Plan provisions
and contribution requirements are established and may be amended by the City Council.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 90 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
79
The International City Management Association Retirement Corporation (ICMA-RC), the trustee for the defined annuity,
offers participants a variety of investment options.
The City’s total payroll for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 was $82,771,355. The Plan members’ payroll for the
same period totaled $4,822,710. The City’s contribution, per the above contribution rates, totaled $407,502. The assets,
reported at fair value based on quoted market prices, totaled $5,588,655 at September 30, 2012.
6. Deferred compensation plan
The City offers its employees a deferred compensation plan created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457.
The plan, available to all City employees, permits them to defer a portion of their salary until future years. Participation in the
plan is optional. The deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death, or
unforeseeable emergency.
Effective January 1, 1997, Federal legislation converted the Section 457 deferred compensation assets from City assets to
employee assets. As a result of these changes, plan assets are no longer subject to the claims of the City’s general creditors.
Consequently, these assets are no longer reported in the accompanying financial statements, in compliance with
Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 32.
E. Post-employment Benefits Other Than Pension
Plan Description - The City of Clearwater administers a single-employer defined benefit healthcare plan (the “Plan”) that
provides medical insurance benefits to its employees and their eligible dependents. Because the City provides a medical
plan to active employees of the City and their eligible dependents, the City is also required by Section 112.0801 of the
Florida Statutes to provide retirees with the opportunity to participate in this Plan. Benefit provisions for the Plan are
established by the City Council and may be amended by the City Council. The retirees pay the full group premium amount
for health insurance with no explicit subsidy from the City. Additionally the City provides and pays for $1,000 of term life
insurance for retirees who retired before October 1, 2008. The term life insurance benefit provision was also established,
and may be amended, by action of the City Council. The City does not issue stand-alone financial statements for these
programs.
Funding Policy – Contribution rates for the Plan are established on an annual basis by the City Council. Eligible retirees
and their covered dependents receiving benefits contribute 100% of their premium costs for health insurance and 0% of the
cost for the $1,000 term life insurance. For the year ended September 30, 2012, the estimated retiree contributions for
health insurance premiums totaled $1,286,998. While the City does not directly contribute towards the costs of retiree
premiums via an explicit subsidy, the ability of retirees to obtain health insurance coverage at a group rate which includes
active employees, constitutes a significant economic benefit to retirees, or an “implicit” subsidy. This implicit subsidy is
considered an “other post-employment benefit” (OPEB) obligation of the City. The City is currently funding this OPEB
obligation on a pay-as-you-go basis. For the year ended September 30, 2012, the City estimated it subsidized $1,149,677
of health care costs for retirees and their covered dependents, and $18,665 of life insurance benefits for retirees.
Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation – The City’s annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on the annual
required contribution of the employer (ARC), an amount actuarially determined in accordance with parameters of GASB
Statement 45. The ARC represents a level of funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal cost
each year and to amortize unfunded liabilities of the plan over a period not to exceed thirty years.
The following table shows the components of the City’s annual OPEB cost for the year, the amount actually contributed to
the plan, and changes in the City’s net OPEB obligation to the Plan, including both the implicit rate subsidy for health
insurance and the term life insurance benefit:
Attachment number 1 \nPage 91 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
80
Annual required contribution2,634,280$
Interest on net OPEB obligation264,102
Adjustment to annual required contribution(253,944)
Annual OPEB cost (expense)2,644,438
Contributions made(1,168,342)
Increase in net OPEB obligation1,476,096
Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year 6,602,550
Net OPEB obligation - end of year8,078,646$
The actuarially determined contribution requirements for the City’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, are based on an
actuarial valuation as of January 1, 2012.
No trust or agency fund has been established for the plan and there were no adjustments to the annual required
contribution or interest earnings.
The City’s annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation
(asset) for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012, are presented below.
Percentage of
Fiscal YearAnnualAnnual OPEBNet OPEB
EndedOPEB CostCosts ContributedObligation
9/30/2010$2,699,09045.43%$5,255,500
9/30/2011$2,615,03048.49%$6,602,550
9/30/2012$2,644,43844.18%$8,078,646
As of September 30, 2012, the accrued liability for benefits was $30,721,086, all of which was unfunded. The covered
payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan) was $68.3 million and the ratio of the unfunded actuarial
liability (UAL) to covered payroll was 45.0%.
Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as understood by the
employer and the plan members) and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical
pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and
assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce the effects of short-term volatility in actuarial accrued
liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long-term perspective of the calculations. Actuarial
valuations for other post-employment benefits involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about
the probability of events far into the future, and consequently actuarially determined amounts are subject to continual
revision as results are compared to past expectations and new estimates are made about the future.
For the September 30, 2012 actuarial valuation, the entry age normal actuarial cost method was used, with an increasing
normal cost pattern consistent with the salary increase assumptions. The Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL)
reflects a 26-year, closed level percent of expected payroll amortization method. The actuarial assumptions included a
4.0% investment rate of return and a 4.0% payroll growth rate. Annual medical costs are assumed to increase 8.5% in
2013 and decrease ½% each subsequent year until reaching the ultimate goal of 5.00% in 2019.
The actuarial valuation of the Plan as of January 1, 2012, reflected changes in actuarial assumptions and methods from
the previous valuation as of January 1, 2010 as follows: The remaining amortization period for the Unfunded Actuarial
Accrued Liability (UAAL) has been reduced from 28 to 26 years. The Investment Discount Rate has decreased from 4.3%
to 4.0%. The Health Care Cost Trend Rate has been increased from 7.5% to 8.0% in 2013, decreasing ½% each
subsequent year so that it is now projected to reach the ultimate goal of 5% in 2019 rather than 2018. The estimate of
Attachment number 1 \nPage 92 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
81
employees hired after April 1, 1986 to not have Medicare taxes withheld and therefore not be eligible for future Medicare
benefits has decreased from 100% to 50%. The estimate of employees retired prior to January 1, 2001 who would
become eligible for Medicare benefits has increased from 25% to 40%. The estimate of employees retired on or after
January 1, 2001 who would become eligible for Medicare benefits has increased from 75% to 90%.
F. Securities lending transactions
The City of Clearwater Employees’ Pension Plan participates in securities lending transactions, as authorized by the Pension
Trustees on April 14, 2003, via a Securities Lending Authorization Agreement with Northern Trust Company, who is also the
pension plan’s custodian. Securities are loaned versus collateral that may include cash, U.S government securities, and
irrevocable letters of credit. U.S. government securities are loaned versus collateral at 102% of the fair value of the securities
plus any accrued interest. Non-U.S. securities are loaned versus collateral at 105% of the fair value plus any accrued interest.
The Plan’s investment policy places no restrictions on the amount of securities that can be loaned.
Non-cash collateral cannot be pledged or sold unless the borrower defaults. All securities loans can be terminated on demand
by either the lender or the borrower. The average term for the pension plans loans at September 30, 2012 was 29 days. If a
borrower fails to return the loaned security because of bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, liquidations, receivership,
conservatorship, or a similar event, Northern Trust Company shall, at its expense, credit the City with the difference between
the fair value of such loaned security and the fair value of the related collateral. At September 30, 2012, there was no failure
by a borrower to return a loaned security.
Cash “open” collateral is invested in a short-term investment pool, the Core USA Collateral Section, which had an average
weighted maturity of 29 days as of September 30, 2012. Cash collateral may also be invested separately in “term loans” in
which investments match the loan term. These term loans may be terminated on demand by either the lender or the borrower.
There were no significant violations of legal or contractual provisions, nor any borrower or lending agent defaults known to the
securities lending agent. The Plan did not impose any restrictions on the amount of loans made by Northern Trust during
fiscal year 2012.
Northern Trust has indemnified the Plan for losses attributable to violations by the entity of the Standard of Care set out in the
Agreement. Northern Trust has also indemnified the Plan for all losses as a result of borrower default and for any losses
resulting from related collateral insufficiency. At year-end the Plan has no credit risk exposure to borrowers because the
amounts the Plan owes the borrowers equal or exceed the amounts the borrowers owe the Plan and the lending agent
indemnifies the Plan if the collateral is inadequate to repay the borrowers.
The following is a summary of securities on loan and their collateral:
Security Type Fair Value Cash Collateral Fair Value Non-Cash Collateral
U.S. Equity90,633,802$ 93,157,977$ 554,852$ 570,248$
U.S. Corporate Fixed7,490,729 7,681,563 - -
U.S. Government Fixed27,848,617 28,530,549 - -
U.S. Agencies1,214,569 1,241,708 - -
Global Equities859,620 914,121 - -
Total128,047,337$ 131,525,918$ 554,852$ 570,248$
Securities Collateralized by Cash Securities Collateralized by Non-Cash
On the statement of fiduciary net assets, a securities lending asset of $131,525,918 was reported that represents the fair
value of the investments made with cash collateral at September 30, 2012. In addition, a securities lending obligation of
$131,525,918 was reported that represents the collateral that the City is required to maintain to cover the fair value of the
loaned securities.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 93 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
82
G. Contingencies and commitments
Loan Guarantee - PACT, Inc.
PACT, Inc. is a nonprofit corporation formed in 1978, for the purpose of financing, constructing, and operating a performing
arts center. Per a Guaranty Agreement dated May 18, 2001, the City guaranteed $1,000,0000 on a $5,000,000 mortgage
note for PACT, Inc., used to refinance a previous mortgage with a similar City guarantee. City management does not
consider it probable that this guarantee will be called, and, accordingly, no amounts have yet been accrued or otherwise
recorded in the accompanying financial statements to reflect this possibility.
Loan Guarantee – Chi Chi Rodriquez Youth Foundation, Inc.
On March 30, 1992, the City Council approved a contingent loan guarantee of $1,000,000 on a $2,500,000 note for the Chi
Chi Rodriquez Youth Foundation, Inc. The proceeds of the note were used to refinance existing foundation debt incurred to
construct a golf course on a parcel of City-owned land. Subsequently, the note was refinanced with Variable Rate Demand
Revenue Bonds (Chi Chi Rodriquez Youth Foundation Project), Series 1998, on August 1, 1998. In the event of default, the
City is obligated to contribute $1,000,000 out of legally available non-ad valorem revenues. In addition, the City has the
option to retire the entire unpaid balance and assume ownership and operation of the golf course facility.
Pollution Remediation Claims Liabilities
Pursuant to GASB Statement 49, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pollution Remediation Obligations, the City is
required to analyze known polluted sites to determine future component cost outlays, including estimation where required,
for pollution remediation. At September 30, 2011, total GASB 49 accruals equaled $879,447, of which $382,763 was
accrued for initial site assessment and support at two sites acquired by the Community Redevelopment Agency (a Special
Revenue Fund), $450,763 in the Gas Utility Fund (a major proprietary fund) for legal assistance and for a five year project
to analyze and treat contaminated soils at the former manufactured gas plant site (see the Soil and groundwater
contamination site note below) and $45,921 in the Airpark Fund (a non-major proprietary fund) for contamination cleanup
from a fuel spill.
During fiscal year 2012 additions to estimates and contractual commitments totaled $83,673 with payments totaling
$462,184. At September 30, 2012, accruals totaled $396,447 consisting of $7,509 for assessment and remediation at two
sites for the Community Redevelopment Agency and $388,938 for assessment and remediation at the Gas Plant site.
In addition to the above sites for which accruals exist, the City has twenty other sites that have known contamination from
petroleum products, metals, arsenic, chlorine or coal tar. Ten of these sites are on the State of Florida Petroleum Clean-up
Program. When any of these ten sites will be scheduled for cleanup cannot be determined at this time. The remaining ten
sites are under monitoring plans or are awaiting responses from the FDEP on data submitted by the City. Any additional
cleanup costs for these sites cannot be estimated at this time.
The Public Utilities Water Pollution Control Northeast site received a No Further Action (NFA) designation and has been
removed from the list. A Stormwater Utility Fund site that was under evaluation for the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP) has been removed due to a determination that there are no known pollution impacts. The
Solid Waste fuel site is awaiting a NFA designation from the Pinellas County Health Department and FDEP, and remains
on the list until such notice is received.
Soil and groundwater contamination site
The City is the owner of property located at 400 Myrtle Street, Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida ("Property"). The
Property occupies approximately six acres and is currently used by the City Gas Division as its administrative offices and
operating facility. The City operated a manufactured gas plant at the Property from approximately 1929 to 1960. Following
the discovery in June 1990 of soil and groundwater impacts at the Property allegedly resulting from the prior operation of
the manufactured gas plant, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("FDEP") directed the City to implement
measures to delineate the area and vertical extent of the impacts at the Property and, if necessary, implement appropriate
remedial actions.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 94 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
83
Contamination assessment activities were initiated at the Property in 1995. On April 17, 1996, the City executed an
Intergovernmental Agreement with FDEP, governing the scope of assessment and remediation work performed at the
Property. The material terms and conditions of the Intergovernmental Agreement require the City to perform contamination
assessment activities to delineate the area and vertical extent of soil and groundwater impacts and, if necessary, to
remediate such impacts to the extent required by Florida law.
Field activities to delineate the extent of impacts were performed from 1995 to 2003. The results of the final field work are
presented in a Supplemental Assessment Report dated May 2003, in which the City's consultant concluded that field
activities to delineate the extent of soil and groundwater impacts were complete and that a risk assessment should be
undertaken to evaluate an appropriate remedy for the reported impacts.
By letter dated April 19, 2004, FDEP directed the City to install two additional monitoring wells within the source area on
site to delineate the vertical extent of groundwater impacts. The City and FDEP previously discussed the potential harm to
the underlying aquifer that may result from the installation of monitoring wells through a source area and the underlying
clay confining unit during a meeting with FDEP held on November 29, 2003. Based on the advice of its environmental
consultant and other specialists consulted concerning this issue, the City has consistently maintained that the installation of
the additional monitoring wells requested by FDEP will likely provide a pathway for the migration of impacts into the aquifer
underlying the clay confining unit that is otherwise not presently impacted by the former operations of the MGP based on
existing perimeter monitoring well data. The City responded to the FDEP by letter dated April 29, 2004, requesting that
FDEP advise the City whether the directive to install the additional vertical extent wells was deemed by FDEP to be final
agency action that would otherwise be subject to review in an administrative proceeding. The City's April 29, 2004
response included a request for an extension of time to file an administrative proceeding in the event that FDEP deemed
the April 19, 2004 FDEP communication to be final agency action.
During fiscal 2005, the Myrtle Avenue Utility and Roadway Widening project began, requiring extensive dewatering during
construction. Consulting, equipment, laboratory, permitting, and labor costs for dewatering in areas where there was
suspected or known contamination from the former MGP plant were charged to the City of Clearwater Gas Division. All
activities related to the Myrtle Avenue dewatering project were documented in the “Supplemental Site Assessment Report
– North Myrtle Ave Roadway Corridor” dated March 2007.
On January 17, 2008, FDEP issued a letter to the City stating FDEP was willing to replace the need for additional vertical
delineation wells with periodic sampling of existing deep wells, as long as they remain unaffected by the contaminants of
concern on the site. In May 2009, FDEP issued a status report on all Manufactured Gas Plant sites in Florida. In the
report it referenced the January 17, 2008 letter and reaffirmed FDEP’s agreement to forego additional on-site vertical
delineation if the City continues to monitor the perimeter wells on the facility. On June 22, 2009, the perimeter monitoring
wells were tested and the results were reported to FDEP. On February 3, 2010, FDEP issued a letter that formally
accepted Clearwater Gas System’s Contamination Assessment Report (CAR) and required no further site assessment
activities. Furthermore, the DEP required CGS to re-sample all monitoring wells on the site within 60 days of the February
3, 2010 letter.
In May 2010, CGS issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) to prepare a Feasibility Study, for DEP approval, that would offer
a long-term corrective action plan for the gas plant site. Arcadis, Inc. was selected to conduct the Feasibility Study;
however, two months into the project the City’s Environmental Attorney, Bill Pence, recommended an alternate method of
site remediation. He proposed that the City work with the University of Waterloo (Canada) to treat the contaminated soils
with sodium persulfate, a chemical oxidant, which would stop the off-site groundwater impacts that are currently
experienced on the Pinellas County Health Department site. Chemical oxidation is accepted as a very effective method of
dealing with Manufactured Gas Plant residuals. This project was approved by the City Council in January 2011. The
project is scheduled to last approximately 5 years at an estimated cost of $425,000.
In addition, the City has pursued insurance claims under certain insurance policies covering the Property for the period of
time from June 1961 through July 1986. On September 17, 2001, the City agreed to reduce its claim against Southern
American Insurance Company ("SAIC"), the sole remaining excess carrier with the City, at an undiscounted value of
Attachment number 1 \nPage 95 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2011
84
$300,000. In December 2007, the liquidator managing the SAIC liquidation made an initial payment to the City in the
amount of $96,000. In September 2008, a second distribution payment of $174,000 was issued to the City. Finally, in
December 2009, the City received a payment of $30,000 for a total collection amount of $300,000. In summary, the City
has recovered $787,500 on all of its outstanding insurance claims.
From 1993 through September 30, 2012, the City spent $1,050,812 on the MGP assessment activities, which includes both
environmental consultant and outside attorney fees.
Contractual Commitment – Water and Sewer Utility
Under the terms of a 30-year contract between the City and Pinellas County, which is effective through September 30,
2035, the maximum amount of water available to the City is 15 million gallons per day on an annual average basis with no
minimum quantity purchase requirement. Effective October 1, 2011, the rate, which is set by the Pinellas County Board of
County Commissioners (BOCC), was $3.4277 per 1,000 gallons. The rate effective October 1, 2012 is $3.5648 per 1,000
gallons. The cost of water purchased from the County during fiscal years 2011 and 2012 was $7,616,248 and $6,183,614
respectively.
Contractual Commitment – Parking System
Under the terms of a put agreement dated October 29, 2010, related to a development agreement between the City and
L.O.M., Inc. (developer) for development of a condominium retail/commercial project including a parking garage, the City is
obligated to purchase the parking garage component of the project for $9,300,000 from the lender if the developer defaults
under the terms of the financing agreement within five years of the project’s completion on July 1, 2011. The City has
segregated and restricted $9.3 million of Parking System enterprise funds per the terms of this put agreement, which
expires on June 30, 2016.
Grant Revenues
During the current fiscal year and prior fiscal years, the City received revenues and contributions related to grants from the
State of Florida, the federal government, and other grantors. These grants are for specific purposes and are subject to
review and audit by the grantor agencies. Such audits could result in requests for reimbursement for expenditures
disallowed under the terms of the grants. Based upon prior experience, City management believes such disallowances, if
any, will not be significant.
Encumbrances
Encumbrance accounting is used in governmental funds to ensure effective budgetary control and accountability and to
facilitate effective cash planning and control. At September 30, 2012, the amount of encumbrances expected to be
honored upon performance by the vendor in the coming year were:
H. Pending litigation
In the normal course of operations the City is a defendant in various legal actions, the ultimate resolution of which is not
expected to have a material effect on the financial statements, other than for amounts that have been reserved and recorded
as liabilities in the Central Insurance Fund.
I. Conduit debt
The City has one issue of conduit debt outstanding as follows:
General fund1,042,958$
Capital Improvement fund20,369,168
Nonmajor governmental funds426,440
21,838,566$
Attachment number 1 \nPage 96 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
For the Year Ended September 30, 2011
85
OriginalAmountAmount
IssueOutstandingOutstanding
Description / Purpose Amountat 9/30/11at 9/30/12
Drew Gardens Refunding Bonds / residential rental facility3,425,000$ 2,380,000$ 2,280,000$
The bonds do not constitute a debt, liability, or obligation of the City of Clearwater, the State of Florida, or any political
subdivision thereof and accordingly have not been reported in the accompanying financial statements.
J. Subsequent Events
On November 6, 2012, Clearwater voters passed a referendum approving several changes to the Employees’ Pension Plan.
These changes, which are effective January 1, 2013 for those employees who are not yet eligible to retire, include
extending the normal retirement date, decreasing the multiplier, changing beneficiary options for nonhazardous duty new
hires, addressing reemployment, increasing employee contributions and changing overtime inclusion calculation for certain
hazardous duty employees, delaying cost-of-living pension increase and changing beneficiary options for employees not
eligible to retire, and making changes to disability retirement provisions. Some pension benefit levels will be reduced for
new hires and for current employees who are not eligible to retire as of the date the changes go into effect. These
changes are expected to provide an actuarially estimated savings to taxpayers of approximately $4.5 million in the first
year after implementation and approximately $400 million during the next 30 years.
On December 17, 2012, the Pension Trustees of the Clearwater Employees’ Pension Plan accepted the consulting
actuary’s recommendations for changes to the assumptions and methods used in the plan’s annual actuarial valuation.
These changes, as described in the actuary’s Experience Investigation for the Five Years Ended December 31, 2011,
include changes to the salary increase assumption, assumed rates of future employee terminations, assumed rates of
future retirements, assumed rates of future disability, assumed mortality rates, and a change in the investment return
assumption. The net effect of all approved changes increases the annual required contribution to the plan by an estimated
$1,665,000, or 2.28% of covered payroll. These changes are to be initially incorporated into the Actuarial Valuation Report
as of January 1, 2013 for determination of the Annual Employer Contribution for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30,
2014.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 97 of 184
Item # 2
86
Page 1 of 3
Schedules of Funding Progress:
Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Unfunded AAL
Valuation Value of Accrued Liability Unfunded Funded Covered as a Percentage
Date Assets (AAL) - Entry Age AAL Ratio Payroll *of Covered Payroll
(a)(b)(b-a)(a/b)(c)((b-a) /c)
1/1/2007 559,830,590$ 582,248,127$ 22,417,537$ 96.1%79,385,090$ 28.2%
1/1/2008 610,979,087$ 632,559,753$ 21,580,666$ 96.6%80,371,617$ 26.9%
1/1/2009 536,834,473$ 557,515,503$ 20,681,030$ 96.3%82,104,837$ 25.2%
1/1/2010 618,444,906$ 638,109,349$ 19,664,443$ 96.9%80,443,199$ 24.4%
1/1/2011 646,956,800$ 665,701,475$ 18,744,675$ 97.2%76,505,599$ 24.5%
1/1/2012 664,087,199$ 681,871,531$ 17,784,332$ 97.4%74,765,020$ 23.8%
Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Unfunded AAL
Valuation Value of Accrued Liability Unfunded Funded Covered as a Percentage
Date Assets (AAL) - Entry Age AAL Ratio Payroll *of Covered Payroll
(a)(b)(b-a)(a/b)(c)((b-a) /c)
1/1/2005 6,744,043$ 8,938,022$ 2,193,979$ 75.5%-$ n/a
1/1/2006 7,445,172$ 8,773,238$ 1,328,066$ 84.9%-$ n/a
1/1/2007 8,375,505$ 8,320,672$ (54,833)$ 100.7%-$ n/a
1/1/2008 8,063,338$ 7,815,729$ (247,609)$ 103.2%-$ n/a
1/1/2010**7,069,681$ 6,752,633$ (317,048)$ 104.7%-$ n/a
1/1/2012**6,341,468$ 5,659,565$ (681,903)$ 112.0%-$ n/a
* Covered payroll is for the calendar year period used for the actuarial valuation.
**Effective 1/1/2008 the fully funded Firefighters'Relief and Pension Plan has opted for biennial actuarial
valuations. Consequently there was no valuation performed on 1/1/2009 and 1/1/2011.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
Required Supplementary Information - Unaudited
Employees Pension Plan
Firefighters' Relief and Pension Plan
Attachment number 1 \nPage 98 of 184
Item # 2
87
Page 2 of 3
Schedules of Employer Contributions:
Year Annual (a)
Ended Required Percent
Sept. 30,Contribution Contributed
2007 13,180,855$ 78%(b)
2008 10,805,681$ 96%(b)
2009 8,451,471$ 122%
2010 22,150,490$ 72%(b)
2011 18,332,319$ 95%(b)
2012 18,014,403$ 99%(b)
Year Annual
Ended Required Percent
Sept. 30,Contribution Contributed
2007 1,467,259$ 100%
2008 -$ (a)n/a
2009 -$ n/a
2010 -$ n/a
2011 -$ n/a
2012 -$ n/a
(a) Effective with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, the Firefighters' Relief and Pension Plan, with no remaining active
members (only retirees), was fully funded per the requirements of the governing Ordinance. The City may elect to contribute
should future valuations show an actuarial need for such.
(b) The actual contribution is less than the annual required contribution due to a "drawdown" of the net pension asset.
(a)The actuarially determined contribution requirements for the City's fiscal year ended September 30,2012 are
based on actuarial valuations as of January 1,2011.Since the City's contributions are made during its fiscal year,
which commences nine months after the date of the actuarial valuations,the City,with approval of State regulatory
authorities,is following the practice of adding interest to its required contributions at the assumed rate of return on
investments for a period of one year.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
Required Supplementary Information - Unaudited
Employees' Pension Plan
Firefighters' Relief and Pension Plan
Attachment number 1 \nPage 99 of 184
Item # 2
88
Page 3 of 3
City of Clearwater, Florida
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
Required Supplementary Information – Unaudited
Notes To Schedules Of Required Pension Supplementary Information
Annual required contributions for the Employees' Pension Plan are calculated using the Entry Age Normal with Frozen Initial Liability
method. The initial unfunded actuarial accrued liability determined at July 1, 1963 is being amortized over a 40-year period; changes
made in 1979 and subsequent years which have had the effect of either increasing or decreasing the actuarial liability are being amortized
over a 30-year period from their effective dates in accordance with State law. The amortization method is level dollar closed.
Annual required contributions for the Firefighters' Relief and Pension Plan are based on the aggregate actuarial cost method, under which
the unfunded portion of the present value of the projected benefits is allocated over the present value of a 6.0% per year increasing
annuity for the remaining years in the 35-year funding period which begin January 1, 1972, pursuant to an agreement between the City
and the Plan participants. For this purpose, the unfunded actuarial liability is determined after consideration of the available assets at the
valuation date. The increasing fixed schedule produced by this method was established in 1988 and will be modified in the future only to
the extent that a current valuation indicates a higher required cost level, or if the resulting cost level exceeds 60% of a mill in a current
year. The amortization method for the Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund is a non-standard (no active employees) closed cost method.
The actuarially determined contribution requirement for the Employees’ Pension Plan for the City's fiscal year ended September 30, 2012,
are based on an actuarial valuation as of January 1, 2011. Since the City's contributions are made during its fiscal year, which
commences nine months after the date of the actuarial valuations, the City, with approval of State regulatory authorities, is following the
practice of adding interest to its required contributions at the assumed rate of return on investments for a period of one year in the case of
the Employees' Pension Plan.
Significant actuarial assumptions utilized in the actuarial valuation as of January 1, 2011, in the determination of the annual required
contribution are as follows:
Employees' Pension Plan
(1) Assumed rate of return on investments of 7.5% per annum (gross before pension expenses).
(2) Projected salary increase at a rate of 6% per year, including cost-of-living adjustments of 3% and merit or seniority increases at
3%.
(3) Mortality based on the RP 2000 Combined Healthy Mortality Table.
(4) Pre-retirement withdrawals assumed to occur in accordance with a table of declining withdrawal rates based on hazardous
versus non-hazardous duty categories.
(5) Pre-retirement incidence of disability assumed to occur in accordance with a standard scale of moderate disability rates (Class
1, 1952 Inter-Company); rates for females assumed to be twice that for males.
(6) Assumed inflation rate of 3%
Effective with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, the Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan, with no remaining active members
(only retirees), was fully funded per the requirements of the governing Ordinance. The City is electing to perform actuarial valuations
biennially for the fully funded plan. Significant actuarial assumptions utilized in the actuarial valuation as of January 1, 2012:
Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Plan
(1) Assumed rate of return on investments of 3.5% compounded annually.
(2) Assumed benefits grow at annually compounded rate of 2% related to cost of living adjustments only.
(3) Mortality based on the 1994 Unisex Mortality Table projected to 2010 for participants.
(4) Assumed no withdrawals will occur.
(5) Assumed probability of an active participant becoming disabled is zero (no active participants).
(6) Assumed value of one mill of ad valorem tax will increase at rate of 5% per year.
(7) Assumed inflation rate of 3%.
Significant changes affecting the presented 6-year trend information include:
The actuarial valuation of the Employees’ Pension Plan as of January 1, 2007, reflected changes in actuarial assumptions as follows: The
mortality assumption was updated from the 1994 Group Annuity Reserving Table to the RP 2000 Combined Healthy Mortality Table; the
retirement assumption was updated to reflect the City’s experience and expected future retirement rates; and the withdrawal assumption
was updated to reflect the City’s experience and expected future withdrawal rates. The impact of these changes decreased the unfunded
actuarial accrued liability from $37,113,063 to $22,417,537.
There were no significant changes in actuarial assumptions affecting the 6-year trend information for the Firefighters’ Relief and
Pension Plan.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 100 of 184
Item # 2
Page 1 of 1
Schedule of Employer Contributions:
FiscalAnnual
YearOPEBEstimated PercentageNet OPEB
EndingCostContributions (1)ContributedObligation
September 30, 20102,699,090$ 1,226,290$ 45.43%5,255,500$
September 30, 20112,615,030$ 1,267,980$ 48.49%6,602,550$
September 30, 20122,644,438$ 1,168,342$ 44.18%8,078,646$
(1) Since there is no funding, these are the estimated benefit payments.
Schedule of Funding Progress:
ActuarialActuarial AccruedUnfunded AAL
ActuarialValue ofLiability (AAL) -UnfundedFundedCoveredas a Percentage
ValuationAssetsProjected Unit CreditAALRatioPayroll of Covered Payroll
Date(a)(b)(b-a)(a/b)(c)((b-a) /c)
October 1, 2008-$ 23,215,500$ 23,215,500$ 0.00%83,100,000$ 27.94%
January 1, 2010-$ 32,823,521$ 32,823,521$ 0.00%80,987,124$ 40.53%
January 1, 2012-$ 30,721,086$ 30,721,086$ 0.00%68,293,356$ 44.98%
City of Clearwater, Florida
Other Post-Employment Benefits
Required Supplementary Information - Unaudited
Significantchangesaffectingthepresentedtrendinformationinclude:TheactuarialvaluationofthePlanasofJanuary1,2012,reflected
changesinactuarialassumptionsandmethodsfromthepreviousvaluationasofJanuary1,2010asfollows:Theremainingamortizationperiod
fortheUnfundedActuarialAccruedLiability(UAAL)hasbeenreducedfrom28to26years.TheInvestmentDiscountRatehasdecreasedfrom
4.3%to4.0%.TheHealthCareCostTrendRatehasbeenincreasedfrom7.5%to8.0%in2013,decreasing½%eachsubsequentyearsothatit
isnowprojectedtoreachtheultimategoalof5%in2019ratherthan2018.TheestimateofemployeeshiredafterApril1,1986tonothave
MedicaretaxeswithheldandthereforenotbeeligibleforfutureMedicarebenefitshasdecreasedfrom100%to50%.Theestimateofemployees
retiredpriortoJanuary1,2001whowouldbecomeeligibleforMedicarebenefitshasincreasedfrom25%to40%.Theestimateofemployees
retired on or after January 1, 2001 who would become eligible for Medicare benefits has increased from 75% to 90%.
89
Attachment number 1 \nPage 101 of 184
Item # 2
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
90
Attachment number 1 \nPage 102 of 184
Item # 2
91
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Special Revenue Funds
Special revenue funds are used to account for specific revenues that are legally restricted to expenditures
for particular purposes.
Special Programs Fund – to account for grants and contributions, the use of which is restricted for certain
programs.
Community Redevelopment Agency Fund – to account for receipt, custody, and expenditure of property tax
increment funds associated with related redevelopment projects.
Local Housing Assistance SHIP Trust Fund – to account for monies allocated to the City under the State
Local Housing Assistance SHIP grant program.
Pinellas County Local Housing Assistance Trust Fund – to account for monies allocated to the City under
the Pinellas County Local Housing Assistance grant program.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 103 of 184
Item # 2
92
Debt Service Funds
Debt service funds provide separate accounting records for all debt interest, principal, and reserve
requirements for general government long-term. Debt of proprietary funds is serviced through restricted
accounts maintained within the individual enterprise or internal service fund associated with the debt.
Notes and Mortgages Debt Service Fund - to account for the advance monthly accumulation of resources
by transfer of General Revenues from the General and Special Revenue Funds and the payment of
currently maturing installments of principal and interest on the various note and mortgage obligations of the
governmental funds during each fiscal year.
Spring Training Facility Revenue Bonds Debt Service Fund – to account for the advance monthly
accumulation of resources received from the State of Florida and Pinellas County, and the payment of
currently maturing installments of principal and interest each year.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 104 of 184
Item # 2
93
Capital Projects Funds
Capital projects funds are used to account for resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of
major capital improvement projects, other than those financed by proprietary funds. A major capital
improvement project is a property acquisition, a major construction undertaking, or a major improvement to
an existing facility or property, with a cost greater than $25,000 and a minimum useful life of at least five
years.
Community Redevelopment Agency Capital Projects Fund – to provide separate accounting records for the
acquisition or construction of capital improvement projects for the Clearwater Community Redevelopment
Agency.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 105 of 184
Item # 2
SHIPPinellas County
CommunityLocal HousingLocal Housing
SpecialRedevelopmentAssistanceAssistance
ProgramsAgencyTrustTrustTotal
ASSETS
Cash and investments$8,731,019 $930,006$277,737 $331,408 $10,270,170
Receivables:
Accrued interest48,69929,738 1,215 2,343 81,995
Mortgage notes9,190,627- 7,035,546785,72617,011,899
Rehab advances9,401- - - 9,401
Other61,98815,696 - - 77,684
Due from other governments - grants2,536,211- - - 2,536,211
Due from other governments - other151,774- - - 151,774
Land held for resale220,7414,618,670- - 4,839,411
Prepaid items- - - - -
Advances to other funds974,267- - - 974,267
Total assets$21,924,727$5,594,110$7,314,498$1,119,477$35,952,812
LIABILITIES
Accounts and contracts payable$55,953$68,782 $- $- $124,735
Accrued payroll28,181- - - 28,181
Due to other governmental entities7748,000 - - 48,077
Construction escrows193,547- 7,70260,613 261,862
Due to other funds- 316,667- - 316,667
Due to other funds (deficit in pooled cash)- - - - -
Advances from other funds- 2,557,600- - 2,557,600
Deferred revenue- 15,696- - 15,696
Total liabilities277,7583,006,7457,70260,6133,352,818
FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable- - - - -
Restricted14,449,9134,618,6707,306,7961,058,86427,434,243
Committed3,799,697- - - 3,799,697
Assigned3,397,359- - - 3,397,359
Unassigned- (2,031,305) - - (2,031,305)
Total fund balances21,646,969 2,587,365 7,306,796 1,058,864 32,599,994
Total liabilities and fund balances$21,924,727$5,594,110$7,314,498$1,119,477$35,952,812
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
Special Revenue Funds
City of Clearwater, Florida
Combining Balance Sheet
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
September 30, 2012
94
Attachment number 1 \nPage 106 of 184
Item # 2
Capital
SpringProject
TrainingFundTotal
NotesFacilityCommunityNonmajor
andRevenueRedevelopmentGovernmental
MortgagesBondsTotalAgencyFunds
$- $560,354 $560,354 $4,611,328 $15,441,852
- 2,3762,376 - 84,371
- - - - 17,011,899
- - - - 9,401
- - - 617 78,301
- - - - 2,536,211
- - - - 151,774
- - - - 4,839,411
87,329 - 87,329 - 87,329
- - - - 974,267
$87,329 $562,730$650,059$4,611,945$41,214,816
$- $- $- $7,716 $132,451
- - - - 28,181
- - - - 48,077
- - - - 261,862
- - - - 316,667
87,329 - 87,329 - 87,329
- - - - 2,557,600
- - - - 15,696
87,329 - 87,329 7,716 3,447,863
87,329 - 87,329 - 87,329
- 562,730 562,730 4,585,94732,582,920
- - - - 3,799,697
- - - 18,2823,415,641
(87,329) - (87,329) - (2,118,634)
- 562,730 562,730 4,604,229 37,766,953
$87,329$562,730$650,059$4,611,945$41,214,816
Debt Service Funds
95
Attachment number 1 \nPage 107 of 184
Item # 2
SHIPPinellas County
CommunityLocal HousingLocal Housing
SpecialRedevelopmentAssistanceAssistance
ProgramsAgencyTrustTrustTotal
REVENUES
Intergovernmental:
Federal$3,951,721$- $- $- $3,951,721
State172,025- - - 172,025
Local184,079857,295 - - 1,041,374
Charges for services1,320,212- - - 1,320,212
Fines and forfeitures441,366- - - 441,366
Investment earnings190,724 105,7868,904 13,232 318,646
Miscellaneous738,33470,01828,213 - 836,565
Total revenues:6,998,4611,033,09937,11713,2328,081,909
EXPENDITURES
Current:
General government514,314- - - 514,314
Public safety2,484,435- - - 2,484,435
Physical environment145,811- - - 145,811
Transportation9,142- - - 9,142
Economic environment470,362430,378100,214 1,769 1,002,723
Human services181,989- - 181,989
Culture and recreation998,221- - 998,221
Debt service:
Principal- - - - -
Interest & fiscal charges- - - - -
Capital outlay214,365 - - - 214,365
Total expenditures5,018,639430,378100,2141,769 5,551,000
Excess (deficiency) of revenues
over / (under) expenditures1,979,822602,721(63,097)11,4632,530,909
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers in1,591,234756,740- - 2,347,974
Transfers out(1,748,818)(1,672,615)(51,161)(373,958)(3,846,552)
Total other financing sources (uses)(157,584)(915,875)(51,161)(373,958)(1,498,578)
Net change in fund balances1,822,238(313,154) (114,258)(362,495)1,032,331
Fund balances - beginning19,824,7312,900,5197,421,0541,421,359 31,567,663
Fund balances - ending$21,646,969$2,587,365$7,306,796$1,058,864$32,599,994
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
Special Revenue Funds
City of Clearwater, Florida
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
96
Attachment number 1 \nPage 108 of 184
Item # 2
Spring
TrainingFundTotal
NotesFacilityCommunityNonmajor
andRevenueRedevelopmentGovernmental
MortgagesBondsTotalAgencyFunds
$- $- $- $- $3,951,721
- 500,004 500,004 - 672,029
- 587,650 587,650 - 1,629,024
- - - - 1,320,212
- - - - 441,366
- 9,9329,932 - 328,578
- - - 3,943 840,508
- 1,097,5861,097,5863,943 9,183,438
- - - - 514,314
- - - - 2,484,435
- - - - 145,811
- - - - 9,142
- - - 362,293 1,365,016
- - - - 181,989
- - - - 998,221
478,769 570,000 1,048,769 - 1,048,769
41,502 506,586 548,088 - 548,088
- - - 82,136 296,501
520,2711,076,5861,596,857444,4297,592,286
(520,271)21,000(499,271)(440,486)1,591,152
520,271- 520,271 1,316,814 4,185,059
- - - (145,797) (3,992,349)
520,271- 520,2711,171,017192,710
- 21,00021,000730,5311,783,862
- 541,730541,7303,873,698 35,983,091
$- $562,730 $562,730 $4,604,229 $37,766,953
Capital
Project
97
Attachment number 1 \nPage 109 of 184
Item # 2
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
98
Attachment number 1 \nPage 110 of 184
Item # 2
Variance with
Final Budget
ActualPositive
OriginalFinalAmounts(Negative)
REVENUES
Intergovernmental - Local$872,614 $857,295 $857,295 $-
Investment earnings120,000 120,000 105,786 (14,214)
Miscellaneous 70,018 70,018 70,018 -
Total revenues1,062,632 1,047,313 1,033,099 (14,214)
EXPENDITURES
Current - Economic environment551,402 548,870 430,378 118,492
Total expenditures551,402 548,870 430,378 118,492
Excess of revenues over expenditures511,230 498,443 602,721 104,278
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers in1,187,699 756,740 756,740 -
Transfers out(1,698,929) (1,672,615) (1,672,615) -
Total other financing sources (uses)(511,230) (915,875) (915,875) -
Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other sources
over expenditures and other uses- (417,432) (313,154) 104,278
Fund balances - beginning2,900,519 2,900,519 2,900,519 -
Fund balances - ending$2,900,519 $2,483,087 $2,587,365 $104,278
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
Budgeted Amounts
City of Clearwater, Florida
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances -
Budget and Actual (GAAP Basis)
Community Redevelopment Agency
99
Attachment number 1 \nPage 111 of 184
Item # 2
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
100
Attachment number 1 \nPage 112 of 184
Item # 2
Nonmajor Enterprise Funds
Enterprise funds are used to account for the financing, acquisition, operation, and maintenance of
governmental facilities that are supported primarily by user charges.
Recycling Utility Fund – to account for the financing, processing, operation and maintenance of the City's
recycling service from charges made to users of the services and funds received from the sale of recyclable
commodities processed to meet market requirements. The service area extends beyond the City limits
Marine Operations Fund - to account for the financing, operation, and maintenance of the City’s marine
operations (excluding the downtown boat slips) and associated real property from rents collected from users.
Aviation Operations Fund - to account for the financing, operation, and maintenance of the City’s airpark
operations from rents collected from users.
Parking System Fund - to account for the financing, construction, operation and maintenance of the City's
parking system, including on- and off-street parking on Clearwater Beach and Downtown Clearwater, from
parking charges.
Harborview Center Fund - to account for the operation of the City’s convention center and related facilities.
Clearwater Harbor Marina Fund - to account for the financing, operation, and maintenance of the City’s
downtown boat slips from boat slip rentals.
101
Attachment number 1 \nPage 113 of 184
Item # 2
RecyclingMarine
UtilityOperations
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and investments$4,824,388 $342,500
Accrued interest receivable21,367 1,167
Accounts and contracts receivable:
Billed 89,709 -
Unbilled charges estimated180,193 -
269,902 -
Less: Allowance for uncollectable accounts(3,111) -
Total receivables, net266,791 -
Due from other governmental entities- -
Inventories, at cost- 57,281
Prepaid expenses and other assets10,313 -
Total current assets - unrestricted5,122,859 400,948
Current assets - restricted:
Restricted cash and investments- -
Total current assets - restricted- -
Total current assets5,122,859 400,948
Noncurrent assets:
Net pension asset85,214 52,597
Capital assets:
Land and other nondepreciable assets- 670,086
Capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation356,991 453,945
Total noncurrent assets442,205 1,176,628
Total assets5,565,064 1,577,576
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable14,256 111,290
Accrued payroll14,440 13,177
Deposits - 33,346
Unearned revenue and liens- -
Current portion of long-term liabilities:
Compensated absences19,747 66,667
Notes, loan pool agreement and acquisition contracts39,979 -
Due to other funds- -
Total current liabilities88,422 224,480
Noncurrent liabilities:
Compensated absences12,404 41,878
Other postemployment benefits107,284 82,241
Notes, loan pool agreement and acquisition contracts20,412 -
Advances from other funds- -
Total non-current liabilities140,100 124,119
Total liabilities228,522 348,599
Net assets:
Invested in capital assets, net of related debt296,600 1,124,031
Restricted for:
Developer agreement- -
Unrestricted5,039,942 104,946
Total net assets$5,336,542 $1,228,977
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
September 30, 2012
Nonmajor Enterprise Funds
Combining Statement of Net Assets
City of Clearwater, Florida
102
Attachment number 1 \nPage 114 of 184
Item # 2
AviationParkingHarborviewClearwater
OperationsSystemCenterHarbor MarinaTotal
$419,108 $6,472,351 $760,716 $973,413 $13,792,476
688 67,935 3,297 1,539 95,993
- - - 18,347 108,056
- - - - 180,193
- - - 18,347 288,249
- - - - (3,111)
- - - 18,347 285,138
50,641 - - - 50,641
- - - - 57,281
- - - - 10,313
470,437 6,540,286 764,013 993,299 14,291,842
- 9,300,000 - - 9,300,000
- 9,300,000 - - 9,300,000
470,437 15,840,286 764,013 993,299 23,591,842
2,025 20,181 - - 160,017
1,478,550 989,832 926,000 - 4,064,468
2,073,243 3,298,347 4,518,998 12,289,839 22,991,363
3,553,818 4,308,360 5,444,998 12,289,839 27,215,848
4,024,255 20,148,646 6,209,011 13,283,138 50,807,690
4,198 54,041 474 6,517 190,776
752 15,909 - 2,558 46,836
- 1,873 - 31,145 66,364
- 17,090 - 2,789 19,879
2,422 32,448 - 1,615 122,899
- - - - 39,979
20,271 - - - 20,271
27,643 121,361 474 44,624 507,004
1,522 20,383 - 1,015 77,202
6,705 148,162 - 26,902 371,294
- - - - 20,412
60,814 - - - 60,814
69,041 168,545 - 27,917 529,722
96,684 289,906 474 72,541 1,036,726
3,551,793 4,288,179 5,444,998 12,289,839 26,995,440
- 9,300,000 - - 9,300,000
375,778 6,270,561 763,539 920,758 13,475,524
$3,927,571 $19,858,740 $6,208,537 $13,210,597 $49,770,964
103
Attachment number 1 \nPage 115 of 184
Item # 2
RecyclingMarine
UtilityOperations
Operating revenues:
Sales to customers$1,049,612 $2,778,226
Service charges to customers7,255 -
User charges to customers1,623,981 164,373
Rentals- 1,134,248
Total operating revenues2,680,8484,076,847
Operating expenses:
Personal services1,066,143 963,988
Purchases for resale200,695 2,287,141
Operating materials and supplies171,865 58,940
Transportation536,451 9,101
Utility service9,332 222,642
Depreciation127,024 111,273
Interfund administrative charges543,520 195,790
Other current charges:
Professional fees4,282 89,611
Advertising17,136 11,166
Communications6,267 14,614
Printing and binding1,097 -
Insurance35,460 35,660
Repairs and maintenance9,150 27,214
Rentals- 1,440
Miscellaneous9,944 66,101
Data processing charges33,400 27,470
Taxes- -
Total other current charges116,736273,276
Total operating expenses2,771,7664,122,151
Operating income (loss)(90,918)(45,304)
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
Investment earnings90,898 5,645
Interest expense(2,562) -
Loss on exchange of capital assets- (15,800)
Other83,355 103,777
Total nonoperating revenue (expenses)171,69193,622
Income (loss) before contributions and transfers80,77348,318
Capital grants and contributions- 77,778
Transfers out(148,260) (217,320)
Changes in net assets(67,487)(91,224)
Total net assets - beginning5,404,0291,320,201
Total net assets - ending$5,336,542$1,228,977
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
City of Clearwater, Florida
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
Nonmajor Enterprise Funds
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Assets
104
Attachment number 1 \nPage 116 of 184
Item # 2
AviationParkingHarborviewClearwater
OperationsSystemCenterHarbor MarinaTotals
$8,040 $4,881,510 $- $- $8,717,388
- - - - 7,255
- - - 19,576 1,807,930
237,481 - 108,605 445,846 1,926,180
245,5214,881,510108,605465,42212,458,753
56,192 1,178,891 - 172,210 3,437,424
- - - 352 2,488,188
3,133 42,262 - 67,184 343,384
1,600 159,848 235 1,701 708,936
43,643 56,186 18,847 53,690 404,340
197,481 275,688 502,792 327,314 1,541,572
20,440 877,800 6,480 40,010 1,684,040
10,597 255,296 3,722 24,532 388,040
- - - 3,648 31,950
- 14,292 - 283 35,456
- 9,224 317 - 10,638
23,050 31,770 - 12,840 138,780
262 717,661 75,381 2,057 831,725
- 313,399 - - 314,839
200 192,389 - 8,228 276,862
730 35,630 - 4,330 101,560
- - 2,163 - 2,163
34,8391,569,66181,58355,9182,132,013
357,3284,160,336609,937718,37912,739,897
(111,807)721,174(501,332)(252,957)(281,144)
- 289,165 13,237 8,191 407,136
(2,396) - - - (4,958)
- - - - (15,800)
11,134 8,859 100,000 52,694 359,819
8,738298,024113,23760,885746,197
(103,069)1,019,198(388,095)(192,072)465,053
519,067 - - - 596,845
(14,140) (487,354) - (2,420) (869,494)
401,858531,844(388,095)(194,492)192,404
3,525,71319,326,8966,596,63213,405,08949,578,560
$3,927,571$19,858,740$6,208,537$13,210,597$49,770,964
105
Attachment number 1 \nPage 117 of 184
Item # 2
RecyclingMarine
UtilityOperations
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
Cash received from customers$2,803,710 $4,085,444
Cash payments to suppliers(473,226) (2,665,562)
Cash payments to employees(1,043,597) (915,232)
Cash payments to other funds(1,121,698) (307,818)
Other revenues83,355 103,777
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities248,544 300,609
CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Transfers out to other funds(148,260) (217,320)
Payment of cash on loans to/from other funds- -
Net cash provided (used) by
noncapital financing activities
CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND
RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on debt(48,583) -
Interest paid(2,290) -
Acquisition of capital assets- (59,875)
Capital contributed by other governmental entities- 77,778
Net cash provided (used) by capital
and related financing activities(50,873) 17,903
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
Interest on investments89,124 5,333
Net cash provided by investing activities89,124 5,333
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents138,535 106,525
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year4,685,853 235,975
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$4,824,388 $342,500
Cash and cash equivalents classified as:
Cash and investments$4,824,388 $342,500
Restricted cash and investments- -
Total cash and cash equivalents$4,824,388 $342,500
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Combining Statement of Cash Flows
Nonmajor Enterprise Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
(148,260) (217,320)
106
Attachment number 1 \nPage 118 of 184
Item # 2
AviationParkingHarborviewClearwater
OperationsSystemCenterHarbor MarinaTotals
$245,521 $4,881,533 $108,793 $455,390 $12,580,391
(115,014) (1,579,247) (207,286) (159,672) (5,200,007)
(54,276) (1,169,727) - (167,479) (3,350,311)
(46,020) (1,094,279) (8,086) (61,349) (2,639,250)
11,134 8,859 100,000 52,694 359,819
41,345 1,047,139 (6,579) 119,584 1,750,642
(14,140) (487,354) - (2,420) (869,494)
(20,272) - - (387,388) (407,660)
- - - - (48,583)
(1,548) - - - (3,838)
(685,876) (8,550) - - (754,301)
568,426 - - 1,236,097 1,882,301
(118,998) (8,550) - 1,236,097 1,075,579
303 283,598 13,222 7,540 399,120
303 283,598 13,222 7,540 399,120
(111,762) 834,833 6,643 973,413 1,948,187
530,870 14,937,518 754,073 - 21,144,289
$419,108 $15,772,351 $760,716 $973,413 $23,092,476
$419,108 $6,472,351 $760,716 $973,413 $13,792,476
- 9,300,000 - - 9,300,000
$419,108 $15,772,351 $760,716 $973,413 $23,092,476
- (1,277,154) (34,412) (487,354) (389,808)
107
Attachment number 1 \nPage 119 of 184
Item # 2
RecyclingMarine
UtilityOperations
City of Clearwater, Florida
Combining Statement of Cash Flows
Nonmajor Enterprise Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net
cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Operating income (loss)$(90,918) $(45,304)
Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss)
to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Other nonoperating revenue83,355 103,777
Depreciation127,024 111,273
Change in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable122,862 -
(Increase) decrease in inventory- 7,367
Increase (decrease) in accounts and contracts payable(16,325) 66,143
Increase (decrease) in deposits- 8,597
Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue- -
(Increase) decrease in net pension asset5,327 3,330
Increase (decrease) in accrued payroll(3,638) 25,579
Increase (decrease) in other postemployment benefits20,857 19,847
Total adjustments339,462 345,913
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities$248,544 $300,609
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
108
Attachment number 1 \nPage 120 of 184
Item # 2
AviationParkingHarborviewClearwater
OperationsSystemCenterHarbor MarinaTotals
$(111,807) $721,174 $(501,332) $(252,957) $(281,144)
11,134 8,859 100,000 52,694 359,819
197,481 275,688 502,792 327,314 1,541,572
- - 188 (12,460) 110,590
- - - - 7,367
(57,379) 32,231 (108,227) (2,166) (85,723)
- (138) - 2,428 10,887
- 161 - - 161
229 4,135 - - 13,021
396 (20,656) - (449) 1,232
1,291 25,685 - 5,180 72,860
153,152 325,965 494,753 372,541 2,031,786
$41,345 $1,047,139 $(6,579) $119,584 $1,750,642
109
Attachment number 1 \nPage 121 of 184
Item # 2
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
110
Attachment number 1 \nPage 122 of 184
Item # 2
Internal Service Funds
Internal service funds are used to account for services and commodities furnished by a designated
department to other departments within the City or to other governments on a cost reimbursement basis.
Garage Fund - to account for the cost of automotive and other motorized equipment of the City. The
acquisition cost of new or upgraded equipment is financed through user departments and the asset value is
simultaneously contributed to the Garage Fund. The cost of replacement of existing equipment is financed
by the Garage Fund.
Administrative Services Fund - to account for various support activities including information technology,
printing, mailing, and telephone services. The cost for these services is charged to user departments based
on the cost of providing units of service.
General Services Fund - to account for various support activities including building maintenance and
custodial services for all City departments and facilities. The cost for these services is charged to user
departments based on the cost of providing units of service.
Central Insurance Fund - to account for the City's limited self-insurance program wherein all funds are
assessed charges based on damage claims incurred and on management's assessment of individual funds'
risk exposure. All claims and premiums are paid out of this fund, together with other costs necessary to
administer the program. Medical insurance premiums and employee health clinic operating expenses are
also paid from this fund.
111
Attachment number 1 \nPage 123 of 184
Item # 2
AdministrativeGeneralCentral
GarageServicesServicesInsuranceTotal
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and investments$5,647,234 $8,073,917 $1,397,765 $33,773,139 $48,892,055
Accrued interest receivable24,089 37,580 6,647 169,091 237,407
Other receivables19,901 - - 26,574 46,475
Due from other funds- - - 428,592 428,592
Inventories, at cost506,597 - - - 506,597
Prepaid expenses and other assets420,782 72,464 - 1,620,099 2,113,345
Total current assets6,618,603 8,183,961 1,404,412 36,017,495 52,224,471
Noncurrent assets:
Advances to other funds- - - 5,572,970 5,572,970
Net pension asset94,031 268,574 10,162 9,836 382,603
Capital assets:
Land and other nondepreciable assets729,591 - - - 729,591
Capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation12,046,151 3,643,059 50,277 - 15,739,487
Total noncurrent assets12,869,773 3,911,633 60,439 5,582,806 22,424,651
Total assets19,488,376 12,095,594 1,464,851 41,600,301 74,649,122
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable611,568 51,935 57,433 2,447,061 3,167,997
Accrued payroll34,209 64,132 31,403 7,441 137,185
Unearned revenue638,055 - - - 638,055
Current portion of long-term liabilities:
Compensated absences113,690 307,998 125,893 20,090 567,671
Notes, loan pool agreement and acquisition contracts1,992,861 361,746 - - 2,354,607
Due to other funds- 91,654 - - 91,654
Claims payable- - - 2,439,700 2,439,700
Total current liabilities (payable from current assets)3,390,383 877,465 214,729 4,914,292 9,396,869
Noncurrent liabilities:
Compensated absences71,415 193,473 79,080 12,620 356,588
Other postemployment benefits163,512 371,779 179,427 36,112 750,830
Notes, loan pool agreement and acquisition contracts4,543,452 781,443 - - 5,324,895
Advances from other funds- 366,614 - - 366,614
Claims payable- - - 6,983,300 6,983,300
Total noncurrent liabilities4,778,379 1,713,309 258,507 7,032,032 13,782,227
Total liabilities8,168,762 2,590,774 473,236 11,946,324 23,179,096
NET ASSETS
Invested in capital assets, net of related debt6,239,429 2,499,870 50,277 - 8,789,576
Unrestricted5,080,185 7,004,950 941,338 29,653,977 42,680,450
Total net assets$11,319,614 $9,504,820 $991,615 $29,653,977 $51,470,026
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Combining Statement of Net Assets
Internal Service Funds
September 30, 2012
112
Attachment number 1 \nPage 124 of 184
Item # 2
AdministrativeGeneralCentral
GarageServicesServicesInsuranceTotal
Operating revenues:
Charges for services$11,754,482 $8,575,606 $4,361,239 $16,311,055 $41,002,382
Other- - - 88,680 88,680
Total operating revenues11,754,4828,575,6064,361,23916,399,73541,091,062
Operating expenses:
Personal services2,442,888 4,744,834 2,350,500 508,295 10,046,517
Purchases for resale4,960,473 - - - 4,960,473
Operating materials and supplies195,403 60,515 372,925 1,529,640 2,158,483
Transportation1,334 107,378 158,365 2,866 269,943
Utility service109,488 - 406,116 3,107 518,711
Depreciation3,835,231 933,927 17,908 - 4,787,066
Interfund administrative charges254,451 4,000 - - 258,451
Other current charges:
Professional fees647,338 239,401 - 1,292,176 2,178,915
Communications18,292 970,530 31,042 5,597 1,025,461
Printing and binding- 18,218 - - 18,218
Insurance
Premiums35,310 19,450 25,650 12,651,850 12,732,260
Claims incurred- - - 3,377,406 3,377,406
Repairs and maintenance493,797 940,288 1,005,234 13,970 2,453,289
Rentals2,062 333,235 18,559 48,835 402,691
Miscellaneous13,440 87,503 19,838 42,225 163,006
Data processing charges101,820 164,490 75,970 12,630 354,910
Taxes5,101 - - - 5,101
Total other current charges1,317,160 2,773,115 1,176,293 17,444,689 22,711,257
Total operating expenses13,116,428 8,623,769 4,482,107 19,488,597 45,710,901
Operating income (loss)(1,361,946) (48,163) (120,868) (3,088,862) (4,619,839)
Nonoperating revenues (expenses)
Investment earnings107,782 166,061 28,226 759,406 1,061,475
Interest expense(157,241) (31,170) - - (188,411)
Gain on sale of capital assets255,956 - - - 255,956
Loss on disposal of capital assets(6,688) (8,248) - - (14,936)
Other140,768 - - 90 140,858
Total nonoperating revenue (expenses)340,577 126,643 28,226 759,496 1,254,942
Income (loss) before contributions and transfers(1,021,369) 78,480 (92,642) (2,329,366) (3,364,897)
Capital grants and contributions1,830,292 2,657 - - 1,832,949
Transfers in904,983 - - 1,448,894 2,353,877
Transfers out(39,623) - - (216,092) (255,715)
Change in net assets1,674,283 81,137 (92,642) (1,096,564) 566,214
Total net assets - beginning9,645,331 9,423,683 1,084,257 30,750,541 50,903,812
Total net assets - ending$11,319,614 $9,504,820 $991,615 $29,653,977 $51,470,026
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Assets
Internal Service Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
113
Attachment number 1 \nPage 125 of 184
Item # 2
AdministrativeGeneralCentral
GarageServicesServicesInsuranceTotal
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
Cash received from other funds$11,754,482 $8,575,606 $4,361,239 $16,373,161 $41,064,488
Cash payments to suppliers(6,199,449) (2,604,750) (1,792,581) (18,242,537) (28,839,317)
Cash payments to employees(2,394,552) (4,598,272) (2,349,244) (528,850) (9,870,918)
Cash payments to other funds(579,055) (498,530) (303,485) (32,197) (1,413,267)
Other revenues66,585 - - 90 66,675
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities2,648,011 874,054 (84,071) (2,430,333) 1,007,661
CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Transfers in from other funds904,983 - - 1,448,894 2,353,877
Transfers out to other funds(39,623) - - (216,092) (255,715)
Payment of cash on loans to/from other funds- (91,653) - (3,450,284) (3,541,937)
Net cash provided (used) by
noncapital financing activities865,360 (91,653) - (2,217,482) (1,443,775)
CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND
RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on debt(2,180,413) (262,679) - - (2,443,092)
Interest paid(157,241) (31,170) - - (188,411)
Acquisition of capital assets(3,417,414) (768,883) - - (4,186,297)
Sale of capital assets249,268 - - - 249,268
Proceeds from issuance of debt2,376,730 567,386 - - 2,944,116
Net cash provided (used) by capital
and related financing activities(3,129,070) (495,346) - - (3,624,416)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
Interest on investments104,127 161,028 27,704 745,324 1,038,183
Net cash provided by investing activities104,127 161,028 27,704 745,324 1,038,183
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents488,428 448,083 (56,367) (3,902,491) (3,022,347)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year5,158,806 7,625,834 1,454,132 37,675,630 51,914,402
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$5,647,234 $8,073,917 $1,397,765 $33,773,139 $48,892,055
Cash and cash equivalents classified as:
Cash and investments$5,647,234 $8,073,917 $1,397,765 $33,773,139 $48,892,055
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Combining Statement of Cash Flows
Internal Service Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
114
Attachment number 1 \nPage 126 of 184
Item # 2
AdministrativeGeneralCentral
GarageServicesServicesInsuranceTotal
City of Clearwater, Florida
Combining Statement of Cash Flows
Internal Service Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net
cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Operating income (loss)$(1,361,946) $(48,163) $(120,868) $(3,088,862) $(4,619,839)
Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss)
to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Other nonoperating revenue140,768 - - 90 140,858
Depreciation3,835,231 933,927 17,908 - 4,787,066
Change in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable(10,377) - - (26,574) (36,951)
(Increase) decrease in inventory(5,764) - - - (5,764)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses(111,438) (34,819) - (637,932) (784,189)
Increase (decrease) in accounts and contracts payable177,007 (123,453) 17,633 1,343,500 1,414,687
Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue(63,806) - - - (63,806)
(Increase) decrease in net pension asset12,858 23,446 11,187 2,307 49,798
Increase (decrease) in accrued payroll15,307 50,895 (9,174) (29,923) 27,105
Increase (decrease) in other postemployment benefits20,171 72,221 (757) 7,061 98,696
Total adjustments4,009,957 922,217 36,797 658,529 5,627,500
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities$2,648,011 $874,054 $(84,071) $(2,430,333) $1,007,661
Noncash investing, capital and financing activities:
Capital assets transferred from General Government$2,735,275 -$ -$ -$ 2,735,275$
115
Attachment number 1 \nPage 127 of 184
Item # 2
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
116
Attachment number 1 \nPage 128 of 184
Item # 2
Fiduciary Funds
Fiduciary Funds are used to account for resources that are managed in a trustee capacity or as an agent for
other parties or funds.
Employees’ Pension Fund - to account for the financial operation and condition of the major employee
retirement system.
Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Fund - to account for the financial operation and condition of the Firefighters'
Relief and Pension Plan, closed to new members in 1962, and containing 39 retired members with no active
members. The Plan was fully funded effective with fiscal year 2007.
Police Supplemental Pension Fund - to account for the financial operation and condition of a supplemental
pension plan funded by the State for sworn police officers.
Firefighters Supplemental Pension Fund - to account for the financial operation and condition of a
supplemental pension plan funded by the State for firefighters.
Treasurer’s Escrow Agency Fund - to account for the receipt, custody, and expenditure of funds held
temporarily in trust for other parties.
117
Attachment number 1 \nPage 129 of 184
Item # 2
City of Clearwater, Florida
Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets
Fiduciary Funds
September 30, 2012
Defined BenefitDefined Contribution
Pension Trust FundsPension Trust Funds
PoliceFirefighters
Employees'Firefighters'SupplementalSupplementalTotals
ASSETS
Cash and investments$2,707,983 $2,713,437 $819,988 $- $6,241,408
Managed investment accounts, at fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents19,123,176 - 151,634 378,215 19,653,025
Government bonds42,960,243 - 2,942,887 498,601 46,401,731
Agency bonds10,779,151 3,222,474 642,556 - 14,644,181
Domestic corporate bonds72,998,283 - 1,215,322 3,577,490 77,791,095
International equity securities60,027,026 - - - 60,027,026
Domestic stocks264,952,603 - 7,721,708 2,129,768 274,804,079
Mortgage backed bonds55,656,320 - 1,739 1,411,600 57,069,659
Asset backed securities1,386,427 - - - 1,386,427
Domestic equity mutual funds94,454,202 - - 2,971,596 97,425,798
International equity mutual funds38,990,976 - 2,253,561 1,581,558 42,826,095
Real estate34,336,944 - - - 34,336,944
Total managed investment accounts695,665,351 3,222,474 14,929,407 12,548,828 726,366,060
Securities lending collateral131,525,918 - - - 131,525,918
Receivables:
Interest and dividends1,858,102 43,595 51,767 59,856 2,013,320
Unsettled investment sales21,900,109 - - - 21,900,109
Securities lending earnings33,298 - - - 33,298
Total receivables23,791,509 43,595 51,767 59,856 23,946,727
Total assets 853,690,761 5,979,506 15,801,162 12,608,684 888,080,113
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable 725,350 - - - 725,350
Unsettled investment purchases10,344,475 - - - 10,344,475
Obligations under securities lending131,525,918 - - - 131,525,918
Total liabilities142,595,743 - - - 142,595,743
NET ASSETS
Net assets held in trust for pension benefits$711,095,018 $5,979,506 $15,801,162 $12,608,684 $745,484,370
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
118
Attachment number 1 \nPage 130 of 184
Item # 2
Defined BenefitDefined Contribution
Pension Trust FundsPension Trust Funds
PoliceFirefighters
Employees'Firefighters'SupplementalSupplementalTotals
ADDITIONS
Contributions:
Contributions from employer$18,030,265 $- $- $- $18,030,265
Contributions from employer - state tax12,000 - 819,117 1,179,573 2,010,690
Contributions from employees5,807,091 - - - 5,807,091
Total contributions23,849,356 - 819,117 1,179,573 25,848,046
Investment income:
Net appreciation (depreciation) in investments fair value105,446,690 9,649 2,132,662 1,392,093 108,981,094
Interest7,676,310 211,218 173,643 227,246 8,288,417
Dividends6,550,007 - 226,128 72,499 6,848,634
119,673,007 220,867 2,532,433 1,691,838 124,118,145
Less investment expenses:
Investment management / custodian fees3,408,690 5,298 83,605 71,823 3,569,416
Net income (loss) from investing activities 116,264,317 215,569 2,448,828 1,620,015 120,548,729
Securities lending income:
Gross earnings412,642 - - - 412,642
Rebate received350,324 - - - 350,324
Bank fees(266,870) - - - (266,870)
Net income from securities lending 496,096 - - - 496,096
Total additions 140,609,769 215,569 3,267,945 2,799,588 146,892,871
DEDUCTIONS
Benefits and withdrawal payments:
Benefits32,707,456 680,500 1,061,191 470,206 34,919,353
Withdrawal payments565,865 - - - 565,865
Total benefits and withdrawal payments33,273,321 680,500 1,061,191 470,206 35,485,218
Income (loss) before administrative expenses107,336,448 (464,931) 2,206,754 2,329,382 111,407,653
Administrative expenses232,286 - 7,633 12,809 252,728
Net increase (decrease)107,104,162 (464,931) 2,199,121 2,316,573 111,154,925
Net assets held in trust for pension benefits:
Beginning of year603,990,856 6,444,437 13,602,041 10,292,111 634,329,445
End of year$711,095,018 $5,979,506 $15,801,162 $12,608,684 $745,484,370
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Assets
Fiduciary Funds
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
119
Attachment number 1 \nPage 131 of 184
Item # 2
BalanceBalance
October 1,September 30,
2011AdditionsDeductions2012
TREASURER'S ESCROW FUND
ASSETS
Cash and investments$423,275 425,253 578,586 $269,942
Accrued interest receivable1,508 1,048 1,642 914
Total Assets$424,783 426,301 580,228 $270,856
LIABILITIES
Other miscellaneous payables:
Downtown Development Board$309,959 414,651 578,647 $145,963
Special purpose funds7,640 96 96 7,640
Other107,184 11,066 997 117,253
Total Liabilities$424,783 425,813 579,740 $270,856
The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities
Agency Fund
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
120
Attachment number 1 \nPage 132 of 184
Item # 2
Supplementary
Information
121
Attachment number 1 \nPage 133 of 184
Item # 2
122
Page 1 of 5
City of Clearwater, Florida
Continuing Disclosure – Gas System Revenue Bonds
Series 2004, 2005, and 2007
Supplementary Information
The System:
Rates, Fees and Charges
The City Council has established a schedule of rates and charges by ordinance, which includes a
purchased gas cost adjustment provision allowing the City to pass-through to customers any increase or
decrease in the purchased price of gas. The City is not subject to regulation by any State agency in
establishing or revising its rates. Where competitive fuel sources or transportation service are available to
the customer, the City Council has authorized the City Manager to enter into contract gas service rates at
special rates and/or conditions as required to obtain/retain the customer load. Such contract service must
meet the normal construction feasibility formula to insure profitable payback to the City. For the fiscal
year ending September 30, 2012, contract rates applied to an average of 152 customer accounts per
month and impacted 8.82% of total annual revenues.
The rates charged by the System through September 30, 1996, were part of the Phase I Gas Rate Case
implemented October 1, 1995, which was based on a comprehensive cost of service study performed by
the Utility Advisory Services Group of the international accounting firm of Coopers & Lybrand, LLP (the
“Rate Study”). This Phase I implementation resulted in an extensive overhaul of the Gas System
customer rates, providing numerous classes of service and a modernized billing methodology.
The new rates, effective October 1, 1996, were designed to be industry-based and responsive to the
competitive energy challenges. The goal of the Rate Study was to establish rates which would be fair to
all classes of customers, provide funding to implement planned expansion in both existing northern
Pinellas County services area and into the newly acquired southwestern Pasco service area, and provide
an adequate growth potential in return to the City of Clearwater to further offset the ad valorem tax rates
(current impact is about 0.5 mills).
As the result of experiences during the first seven months of the Phase I implementation, adjustments
made to the Phase II rates were implemented October 1, 1996, and additional adjustments (Phase III)
were implemented effective October 1, 1997. The total projected impact of both new phases of the rate
case was $1.05 million, or less than 7.9% of total gas sales revenues.
The rate ordinance containing the Phase II and Phase III rate changes was approved by the City Council
on June 6, 1996. Gas rates for customer charges were increased effective April 1, 2005. The total
estimated annual impact of this rate increase was $373,352.
New rates, effective October 1, 2008, were designed to recover the costs of providing service to
respective classes of customers. The goal of the “Cost of Service and Rate Study” was to establish rates
which would be sufficient to meet Clearwater Gas System’s total revenue requirements and reflect cost of
service consideration and practical rate implementation constraints as required.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 134 of 184
Item # 2
CL
E
A
R
W
A
T
E
R
G
A
S
S
Y
S
T
E
M
NA
T
U
R
A
L
G
A
S
R
A
T
E
B
I
L
L
I
N
G
F
A
C
T
O
R
S
FO
R
A
U
G
U
S
T
1
,
2
0
1
2
-
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
3
0
,
2
0
1
2
B
A
S
E
D
O
N
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
G
A
S
A
D
J
U
S
T
M
E
N
T
F
A
C
T
O
R
S
In
t
e
r
r
.
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
F
i
r
m
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
G
a
s
R
a
t
e
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
s
NG
R
a
t
e
NG
R
a
t
e
R
S
S
M
F
M
M
F
L
M
F
S
G
S
M
G
S
L
G
S
R
A
C
G
A
C
L
A
C
S
L
SL
w
/
M
&
N
G
V
N
S
S
I
S
C
N
S
(C
l
o
s
e
d
1
/
0
9
)
R
e
l
i
g
h
t
(N
o
n
-
R
e
s
l
)
(
N
o
n
-
R
e
s
l
)
App
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
A
n
n
u
a
l
T
h
e
r
m
R
a
n
geN
A
(1
-
N
A
(4
+
N
A
(4
+
N
A
(4
+
0
-
1
8
,
0
0
0
-
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
N
A
(1
-
N
A
(0
-
N
A
(15
0
N
A
NA
NA
NA
10
0
,
0
0
0
N
A
o
r
O
t
h
e
r
R
a
t
e
D
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
n
t
3
U
n
i
t
s
)
U
n
i
t
s
)
U
n
i
t
s
)
U
n
i
t
s
)
17
,
9
9
9
9
9
,
9
9
9
&
u
p
3
U
n
i
t
s
)
14
9
t
o
n
s
)
to
n
s
&
+
)
&
u
p
Mo
n
t
h
l
y C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
C
h
a
r
ge
$
1
0
.
0
0
$
2
5
.
0
0
$
4
0
.
0
0
$
9
5
.
0
0
$
2
5
.
0
0
$
4
0
.
0
0
$
9
5
.
0
0
$
1
0
.
0
0
$
2
5
.
0
0
$
4
0
.
0
0
$
2
0
.
0
0
$
2
0
.
0
0
B
y C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
$
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
5
0
.
0
0
B
y C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
(Fo
r
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
a
s
c
o
T
e
r
r
i
t
o
r
y)
($1
8
.
0
0
)
($4
0
.
0
0
)
($7
0
.
0
0
)
($1
6
0
.
0
0
)
($4
0
.
0
0
)
($7
0
.
0
0
)
($1
6
0
.
0
0
)
($1
8
.
0
0
)
($4
0
.
0
0
)
($7
0
.
0
0
)
($3
0
.
0
0
)
($3
0
.
0
0
)
(By C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
)
($7
5
.
0
0
)
$4
0
0
.
0
0
(By C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
)
if
n
o
t
p
r
e
v
.
if
n
o
t
p
r
e
v
.
i
f
n
o
t
p
r
e
v
.
No
n
-
F
u
e
l
E
n
e
r
g
y
C
h
a
r
g
e
/
T
h
e
r
m
bi
l
l
e
d
b
i
l
l
e
d
b
i
l
l
e
d
No
n
-
F
u
e
l
E
n
e
r
gy
C
h
a
r
ge
$
0
.
4
8
$
0
.
4
8
$
0
.
4
8
$
0
.
4
8
$
0
.
4
6
$
0
.
4
0
$
0
.
3
4
$
0
.
2
0
$
0
.
1
5
$
0
.
1
0
$
0
.
2
0
$
0
.
3
5
B
y C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
$
0
.
4
6
$
0
.
2
8
B
y C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
En
e
r
gy
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
A
d
j.
(EC
A
)
0.
1
3
0
.
1
3
0
.
1
3
0
.
1
3
0
.
1
3
0
.
1
3
0
.
1
3
N
A
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Re
gul
a
t
o
r
y I
m
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
d
j.
(RI
A
)
0.
0
3
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
3
N
A
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Us
a
ge
&
I
n
f
l
a
t
i
o
n
A
d
j.
(UI
A
)
0.
0
8
0.
0
8
0.
0
8
0.
0
8
0.
0
6
0.
0
6
0.
0
6
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
To
t
a
l
N
o
n
-
F
u
e
l
E
n
e
r
g
y
C
h
a
r
g
e
$0
.
7
2
$
0
.
7
2
$
0
.
7
2
$
0
.
7
2
$
0
.
6
8
$
0
.
6
2
$
0
.
5
6
$
0
.
2
0
$
0
.
1
5
$
0
.
1
0
$
0
.
2
0
$
0
.
3
5
B
y C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
$
0
.
4
6
$
0
.
2
8
B
y C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
d
G
a
s
A
d
jus
t
m
e
n
t
(PG
A
)
0.
7
6
0.
7
6
0.
7
6
0.
7
6
0.
7
6
0.
7
6
0.
7
6
0.
7
6
0.
7
6
0.
7
6
0.
7
6
0.
7
6
0.
6
8
0.
7
6
0.
6
8
0.
6
8
To
t
a
l
E
n
e
r
g
y
C
h
a
r
g
e
/
T
h
e
r
m
14
8
14
8
14
8
14
8
14
4
13
8
13
2
09
6
09
1
08
6
09
6
11
1
06
8
12
2
09
6
06
8
City of Clea
Continuing Disclosure -
Series 2004
Supplement____________________________
123
To
t
a
l
En
e
r
g
y
Ch
a
r
g
e
/
T
h
e
r
m
1.48
1.48
1.48
1.48
1.44
1.38
1.32
0.96
0.91
0.86
0.96
1.11
0.68
1.22
0.96
0.68
+
N
o
n
-
F
u
e
l
+
N
o
n
-
F
u
e
l
Mi
n
i
m
u
m
M
o
n
t
h
l
y B
i
l
l
$
1
0
.
0
0
$
2
5
.
0
0
$
4
0
.
0
0
$
9
5
.
0
0
$
2
5
.
0
0
$
4
0
.
0
0
$
9
5
.
0
0
$
1
0
.
0
0
$
2
5
.
0
0
$
4
0
.
0
0
$
2
0
.
0
0
$
2
0
.
0
0
B
y C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
$
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
5
0
.
0
0
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
(Fo
r
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
a
s
c
o
T
e
r
r
i
t
o
r
y)
($1
8
.
0
0
)
($4
0
.
0
0
)
($7
0
.
0
0
)
($1
6
0
.
0
0
)
($4
0
.
0
0
)
($7
0
.
0
0
)
($1
6
0
.
0
0
)
($1
8
.
0
0
)
($4
0
.
0
0
)
($7
0
.
0
0
)
($3
0
.
0
0
)
($3
0
.
0
0
)
(By C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
)
($7
5
.
0
0
)
$4
0
0
.
0
0
C
h
a
r
ge
+
@ p
r
e
m
i
s
e@ p
r
e
m
i
s
e
@ p
r
e
m
i
s
e
+
F
A
C
+
F
A
C
+
F
A
C
+
F
A
C
+
N
o
n
-
F
u
e
l
T
hNo
n
-
F
u
e
l
T
h
e
r
m
Ra
t
e
f
o
r
C
o
n
t
Ra
t
e
f
o
r
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
#
o
f
T
h
e
r
m
s
#
o
f
T
h
e
r
m
s
Co
m
p
a
r
e
s
t
o
L
P
/
G
a
l
l
o
n
R
a
t
e
o
f
$1
.
3
5
$
1
.
3
5
$
1
.
3
5
$
1
.
3
5
$
1
.
3
2
$
1
.
2
6
$
1
.
2
1
$
0
.
8
8
$
0
.
8
3
$
0
.
7
9
$
0
.
8
8
$
1
.
0
2
$
0
.
6
2
$
1
.
1
2
$
0
.
8
8
w
i
t
h
6
.
0
%
F
r
a
n
c
h
i
s
e
$
1
.
4
4
$
1
.
4
4
$
1
.
4
4
$
1
.
4
4
$
1
.
4
0
$
1
.
3
4
$
1
.
2
8
$
0
.
9
3
$
0
.
8
8
$
0
.
8
3
$
0
.
9
3
$
1
.
0
8
$
0
.
6
6
$
1
.
1
8
$
0
.
9
3
Ch
a
n
ge
f
r
o
m
1
/
2
0
0
6
T
h
e
r
m
R
a
t
e
-
$
0
.
7
8
-
$
0
.
7
8
-
$
0
.
7
8
-
$
0
.
7
8
-
$
0
.
7
1
-
$
0
.
7
1
-
$
0
.
7
1
-
$
0
.
9
2
-
$
0
.
9
2
-
$
0
.
9
2
-
$
0
.
9
2
-
$
0
.
8
7
-
$
1
.
1
0
-
$
0
.
9
3
-
$
0
.
7
8
-
$
0
.
7
8
%
C
h
a
n
ge
f
r
o
m
1
/
2
0
0
6
T
h
e
r
m
R
a
t
e
-
3
4
.
5
%
-
3
4
.
5
%
-
3
4
.
5
%
-
3
4
.
5
%
-
3
3
.
0
%
-
3
4
.
0
%
-
3
5
.
0
%
-
4
8
.
9
%
-
5
0
.
3
%
-
5
1
.
7
%
-
4
8
.
9
%
-
4
3
.
9
%
-
6
1
.
8
%
-
4
3
.
3
%
-
4
4
.
8
%
-
5
3
.
4
%
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
N
o
t
e
:
Fu
e
l
R
a
t
e
p
e
r
T
h
e
r
m
1
0
/
0
1
/
1
9
7
3
$
0
.
0
6
9
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
5
5
$
0
.
0
0
0
No
n
-
U
t
i
l
i
t
y T
a
x
a
b
l
e
F
u
e
l
/
T
h
e
r
m
$
0
.
6
9
1
$
0
.
7
6
0
$
0
.
7
6
0
$
0
.
7
6
0
$
0
.
7
6
0
$
0
.
7
6
0
$
0
.
7
6
0
$
0
.
7
6
0
$
0
.
7
6
0
$
0
.
7
6
0
$
0
.
7
6
0
$
0
.
7
6
0
$
0
.
6
8
0
$
0
.
7
6
0
$
0
.
6
2
5
$
0
.
6
8
0
BT
U
F
A
C
T
O
R
=
T
H
E
R
M
S
/
1
0
0
C
U
B
I
C
F
E
E
T
(
C
C
F
)
10
/
2
0
1
1
11
/
2
0
1
1
12
/
2
0
1
1
01
/
2
0
1
2
02
/
2
0
1
2
03
/
2
0
1
2
04
/
2
0
1
2
05
/
2
0
1
2
06
/
2
0
1
2
07
/
2
0
1
2
08
/
2
0
1
2
09
/
2
0
1
2
FY
1
1
/
1
2
A
v
e
r
a
ge
Fi
r
m
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
R
a
t
e
s
1
.
0
3
5
1
.
0
3
6
1
.
0
3
6
1
.
0
3
6
1
.
0
3
5
1
.
0
3
5
1
.
0
3
5
1
.
0
3
4
1
.
0
3
9
1
.
0
3
4
1
.
0
3
6
1
.
0
3
4
1
.
0
3
5
In
t
e
r
r
u
p
t
i
b
l
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
R
a
t
e
s
1
.
0
1
5
1
.
0
1
6
1
.
0
1
6
1
.
0
1
6
1
.
0
1
5
1
.
0
1
5
1
.
0
1
5
1
.
0
1
3
1
.
0
1
9
1
.
0
1
4
1
.
0
1
6
1
.
0
1
4
1
.
0
1
5
City of Clearwater, Florida
Continuing Disclosure -Gas System Revenue Bonds
Series 2004, 2005, and 2007
Supplementary Information __________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 5
123
Attachment number 1 \nPage 135 of 184
Item # 2
Page 3 of 5
Table 1 Breakdown of Transportation Capacity
Phase II (FTS-1)Phase III (FTS-2)Total
MMBtu Per DayMMBtu Per DayMMBtu
Contract Period 2/01/07 - 1/31/1712/9/91 - 2/28/15Per Day
October 170,43841,788212,226
Nov-Mar1,543,069268,9311,812,000
April216,57053,430270,000
May-Sept711,756206,244918,000
Total Annual2,641,833570,3933,212,226
ThetwonaturalgastransmissioncompaniesthatservewithintheStateofFloridaareFloridaGasTransmission(FGT)
andGulfstream.CurrentlyFGTisthesoleprovideroftransportationservicetotheCity.FGTisownedbyCitrusCorp.
CitrusCorpisowned50%byEnergyTransferPartners,LLCAND50%byKinderMorgan,Inc.FGTisoperatedby
Panhandle Energy, a subsidiary of Energy Transfer Partners.
TheCityjoinedFloridaGasUtility(FGU)inOctober2000byResolution00-35.FGUisresponsibleforthepurchase&
managementoftheCity'snaturalgassupply.AnupdatedAllRequirementsGasServiceAgreement,whichwas
approvedbyResolution02-02inJanuary2002,requiredtheCitytopurchase100%ofitssupplythroughFGU.FGUwas
formedthroughanInterlocalAgreementamongitsmembers.TheInterlocalAgreementbecameeffectiveonSeptember
1,1989andconsistedoffivemunicipalutilities.Overthenextseveralyears,additionalelectricandgasdistribution
utilities joined FGU, bringing its current membership to 25 entities.
Inaddition,theCityhasenteredintoaGasSupply&TransportationAgreementwithPeoplesGasSystem(PGS),dated
12/02/04,topurchasenaturalgastoservecustomerslocatedinourCentralPascoterritory,generallyeastofthe
SuncoastParkwayinPascoCounty.TheCityreceivedaletterfromFGUCouncil,dated8/31/04,grantingtheCity
permissiontoutilizeTECOPeoplesGasasathirdpartygassuppliersinceFGUisunableandunwillingtoprovidegasto
theCitywithinthemeaningoftheprovisionsofSection3(a)(i)and(ii)oftheALLRequirementsGasServiceAgreement
between the City and FGU.
TheCityhastwoFirmTransportationServiceagreements(FTS-1&FTS-2)withFGTinordertodelivernaturalgasto
theCity'sfourgatestations.FGUiscurrentlymanagingtheCity'sPhaseII(FTS-1)andPhaseIII(FTS-2)transportation
capacityonadailybasis.Table1showsthebreakdownoftheCity'sannualgassupplyentitlementswithFGT.Thetotal
annual entitlement is 3,212,226 decatherms of natural gas transportation.
City of Clearwater, Florida
Continuing Disclosure - Gas System Revenue Bonds
Series 2004, 2005, and 2007
Supplementary Information
GAS SUPPLY
OnAugust1,1990,theFederalEnergyRegulatoryCommission(FERC)deregulatedthenaturalgaspipelineindustry.
Thisallowsothernaturalgassuppliersandlocaldistributioncompanies,liketheCityofClearwater,totransportgasover
the Florida Gas Transmission (FGT) pipelines as opposed to purchasing natural gas supply from only FGT.
124
Attachment number 1 \nPage 136 of 184
Item # 2
125
Page 4 of 5
City of Clearwater, Florida
Continuing Disclosure – Gas System Revenue Bonds
Series 2004, 2005, and 2007
Supplementary Information
Service Area
The Clearwater Gas System (CGS) is owned and operated as an enterprise utility by the City of
Clearwater. CGS operates over 830 miles of underground gas main and handles the supply and
distribution of both natural and propane (LP) gas throughout northern Pinellas County and western Pasco
County. As a “full service” gas utility, CGS provides gas appliance sales, installation of inside customer
gas piping, domestic and commercial gas equipment service, construction and maintenance of
underground gas mains and service lines, and 24-hour response to any gas emergency within the service
area. CGS is regulated for safety by the Florida Public Service Commission and the Federal Department
of Transportation.
CGS has been serving customers in the Clearwater area for over 88 years (since 1923) when operations
were begun with a manufactured gas plant operation from coal and coke. In 1959, when natural gas
transmission lines were finally extended to the Florida peninsula, CGS discontinued manufacturing gas
and began receiving piped natural gas from Florida Gas Transmission.
Clearwater Gas System serves over 19,807 customers in a 330 square mile service territory, which
includes 20 municipalities as well as the unincorporated areas of northern Pinellas County and western
Pasco County. The Pinellas County service territory is 158 square miles and extends generally from
Ulmerton and Walsingham Roads on the south to the Pasco County line on the north and from the Gulf of
Mexico on the West to the Hillsborough County line on the east. This includes all of the Pinellas beach
communities south to Redington Beach. The Pasco County service territory is 172 square miles and
extends from the Gulf of Mexico on the West inland about 20 miles to just east of State Road 41 and
Land O’ Lakes and from the Pinellas and Hillsborough County lines on the South to generally State Road
52 on the north. The CGS service territory extends 42.3 miles from the southwestern-most to the
northwestern-most points.
Clearwater Gas System prides itself in being a competitive and public service-minded utility, providing
safe, economical and environmentally-friendly gas, which is made in America, available in our
communities for all of the homes and businesses in our service area, with special focus on the residential
customers who make up 88.79% of our customer base.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 137 of 184
Item # 2
Page 5 of 5
City of Clearwater, Florida
Continuing Disclosure - Gas System Revenue Bonds
Series 2004, 2005, and 2007
Supplementary Information
As of September 30, 2012 the System's active natural gas customers were located as shown in the
following table:
LocationMetersPercentage
Belleair4372.43%
Belleair Beach1801.00%
Belleair Bluffs280.16%
Belleair Shores250.14%
Clearwater6,62536.80%
Dunedin1,0936.07%
Indian Rocks Beach1020.57%
Indian Shores740.41%
Largo8924.95%
New Port Richey3301.83%
North Redington Beach140.08%
Oldsmar1030.57%
Port Richey110.06%
Redington Beach730.41%
Redington Shores420.23%
Safety Harbor5843.24%
Tarpon Springs1,4508.05%
Unincorporated Areas Pasco2,73615.20%
Central Pasco4282.38%
Unincorporated Areas Pinellas2,77615.42%
Total18,003100.00%
The following table shows the five largest interruptible customers by peak monthly consumption and
the percent of the System's revenues derived from such customers during the 12 months ending
September 30, 2012:
Peak Monthly% of Gross
Customer Name ThermsRevenues
Morton Plant Hospital125,3573.93%
Metal Industries96,9082.12%
Ajax Paving Industries105,2722.11%
Angelica Textile Service63,2551.92%
Largo Medical Center44,0931.46%
The following table shows the breakdown of the System's customers by category as well as the volume
of gas sold and the sales revenues generated by each category for the year ended September 30, 2012:
Average No.Gas Gas
Customers VolumeSales
Interruptible16 27.49%16.72%
Residential15,761 13.64%21.12%
Commercial2,156 58.87%62.16%
ThermsRevenues
Interruptible6,042,116 5,132,349$
Residential2,998,580 6,481,018
Commercial12,937,800 19,073,907
Totals21,978,496 30,687,274$
126
Attachment number 1 \nPage 138 of 184
Item # 2
127
Page 1 of 3
City of Clearwater, Florida
Continuing Disclosure – Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds
Series 2003, 2009B and 2011; and Revenue Bonds Series 2006 and 2009A
Supplementary Information
Historical Financial Information
Water System:
Source and Volume of Water Pumped
(in million gallons per day, averaged over the fiscal year)
FY City Wells County Total
20073.570 9.090 12.660
20083.075 8.844 11.919
20093.738 7.781 11.519
20104.105 6.820 10.925
20114.946 6.371 11.317
20125.925 4.999 10.924
Historical Growth in Number of Water Customers
(all figures are as of September of the year indicated)
Ten Largest Water Customers
Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2012
Water Used
( in 100Revenues
Name of User Cubic Feet)Produced
1. City of Clearwater73,875 703,389$
2. Chruch of Scientology FSO Inc.106,766 571,997
3. Morton Plant Hospital64,054 422,641
4. Pinellas County Schools34,077 307,777
5. IMT-Capital Macarthur Park Apartments LLC36,101 194,947
6. Crystal Beach Capital LLC33,313 190,909
7. Pinnacle Management Corp.35,143 172,506
8. Clearwater Housing Authority34,947 169,854
9. Sandpearl Resort LLC31,653 167,153
10. Brenntag Mid-South Inc.26,180 152,059
476,109 3,053,232$
Water
Year Customers
200740,407
200840,131
200939,935
201039,971
201141,391
201241,988
Attachment number 1 \nPage 139 of 184
Item # 2
128
Page 2 of 3
City of Clearwater, Florida
Continuing Disclosure – Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds
Series 2003, 2009B and 2011; and Revenue Bonds Series 2006 and 2009A
Supplementary Information
Sewer System:
Average Sewage Flow and Historical Growth in Number of Sewer Customers
(as of September of the year indicated)
FiscalAnnual Avg. Daily
Year Flow in MGD Sewer Customers
200713.6 33,255
200814.0 33,146
200913.6 33,084
201014.3 33,041
201114.8 33,063
Ten Largest Sewer Customers
Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2012
Sewer Used
( in 100Revenues
Name of User Cubic Feet)Produced
1. Church of Scientology85,619 528,021$
2. Pinellas County Schools33,470 413,666
3. Morton Plan Hospital57,848 443,682
4. City of Clearwater29,087 393,667
5. Pinnacle Management Corp.35,143 198,063
6. IMT-Capital Macarthur Park Apartments LLC36,101 201,986
7. Clearwater Housing Authority33,470 206,153
8. Crystal Beach Capital LLC33,313 189,821
9. Publix Supermarkets12,077 177,188
10. Bre/Clearwater Owner LLC33,441 188,870
389,569 2,941,117$
Rates, Fees And Charges
The City uses a three-tiered rate structure for water and sewer usage. The base rate includes a
minimum usage for residential and nonresidential water rates. Any usage over the minimum is
billed at one rate per 1,000 gallons up to a designated level and at a second rate for usage over
that level. For irrigation, there is a base rate, with no minimum, and a charge per 1,000 gallons of
water usage up to a designated level and a higher charge for usage over that amount. The sewer
base rate includes a minimum usage and a fixed charge per 1,000 gallons of water usage over
the basic allowance. The minimum usage and second tier usage level vary with the size of the
meters. For fiscal year 2012 there were no changes to the three-tiered rate structure for water or
sewer usage.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 140 of 184
Item # 2
129
Page 3 of 3
City of Clearwater, Florida
Continuing Disclosure – Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds
Series 2003, 2009B and 2011; and Revenue Bonds Series 2006 and 2009A
Supplementary Information
Residental and October 1,October 1,October 1,October 1,October 1,
Nonresidential Water Rates 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Minimum - Under 1 inch13.65$ 14.58$ 15.60$ 16.30$ 17.03$
1 inch31.85 34.02 36.40 38.04 39.75
1.5 inch455.00 486.00 520.00 543.40 567.85
2 inch1,060.15 1,132.38 1,211.60 1,266.12 1,323.10
3 or 2 inch manifold1,633.45 1,744.74 1,866.80 1,950.81 2,038.60
4 inch3,144.05 3,358.26 3,593.20 3,754.89 3,923.86
6 inch8,076.25 8,626.50 9,230.00 9,645.35 10,079.39
8 inch13,650.00 14,580.00 15,600.00 16,302.00 17,035.59
Size of Meter
Additional charges are assessed for usage in excess of designated minimums.
Rates for Irrigation October 1,October 1,October 1,October 1,October 1,
(Lawn) Meters 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Minimum - Under 1 inch4.86$ 5.20$ 5.56$ 5.81$ 6.07$
1 inch14.58 15.60 16.69 17.44 18.22
1.5 inch72.94 78.05 83.51 87.27 91.20
2 inch200.22 218.52 233.82 244.34 255.34
3 or 2 inch manifold403.59 431.84 462.07 482.86 504.59
4 inch778.03 832.49 890.76 930.84 972.73
6 inch2,348.65 2,513.06 2,688.97 2,809.97 2,936.42
Size of Meter
October 1,October 1,October 1,October 1,October 1,
Sewer Rates 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Minimum - Under 1 inch18.75$ 20.07$ 21.48$ 22.44$ 23.46$
1 inch43.75 46.83 50.12 52.36 54.74
1.5 inch625.00 669.00 716.00 748.00 728.00
2 inch1,456.25 1,558.77 1,668.28 1,742.84 1,822.06
3 or 2 inch manifold2,243.75 2,401.71 2,570.44 2,685.32 2,807.38
4 inch4,318.75 4,622.79 4,947.56 5,168.68 5,403.62
6 inch11,093.75 11,874.75 12,709.00 13,277.00 13,880.50
8 inch18,750.00 20,070.00 21,480.00 22,440.00 23,460.00
Per 1,000 gallons of water used
over the allowed minimum6.256.697.167.487.82
Size of Meter
Additional Indebtedness
Additional indebtedness was incurred for capital improvements to the water and sewer systems or for the
lease purchase of capital equipment in the amount of $9,553.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 141 of 184
Item # 2
130
Page 1 of 1
City of Clearwater, Florida
Continuing Disclosure – Stormwater System Revenue Bonds
Series 2004, 2005, and 2012
Supplementary Information
Rates, Fees, and Charges
The City uses a measurement of one equivalent residential unit or ERU as the basis for the
stormwater management utility fee. The rates per ERU from the inception of the utility are as
follows:
Rate
Effective Date Per ERU
January 1, 1991$3.00
October 1, 19984.00
October 1, 19994.17
October 1, 20004.35
October 1, 20014.54
January 1, 20026.13
October 1, 20027.16
October 1, 20038.01
October 1, 20048.65
October 1, 20059.35
October 1, 20069.71
October 1, 200710.51
October 1, 200811.14
October 1, 200911.80
October 1, 201012.51
October 1, 201113.04
October 1, 201213.40
October 1, 201313.77
Single-family homes, multifamily units, condominium units, apartments and mobile homes are
rated as one ERU per dwelling unit. Nonresidential property is charged at the rate of 1,830
square feet of impervious area per ERU.
HISTORICAL NET REVENUES
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Net Operating Revenues (Excluding
Depreciation)5,681,465$ 5,750,323$ 7,471,323$ 7,247,625$ 7,343,935$
Interest Income and other
Non-operating Revenues (Expenses)550,935 787,426 1,045,752 491,646 539,860
Total Net Revenues6,232,400$ 6,537,749$ 8,517,075$ 7,739,271$ 7,883,795$
Maximum Annual Debt Service2,889,994$ 2,889,994$ 2,889,994$ 2,889,994$ 2,693,144$
Coverage2.16 2.26 2.95 2.68 2.93
Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
Attachment number 1 \nPage 142 of 184
Item # 2
131
City of Clearwater, Florida
Fire Services Program
Supplementary Information
Pursuant to agreements between the City of Clearwater, the Pinellas County Fire Authority and the Pinellas
County Emergency Medical Services Authority, the City has provided fire and emergency medical services to
the respective authorities. With respect to fire services, the services are provided for the benefit of properties
located outside the corporate limits of the City, but within a designated service area. Emergency medical
services are provided for the benefit of persons residing both inside and outside the corporate limits of the City,
based on the Authority's nearest unit dispatch policy.
With respect to the Fire Services Program, a budget was prepared by Fire Department personnel covering
proposed expenditures for fiscal year ending September 30, 2012, for the Fire Department as a whole. Since
the funding for the Emergency Medical Services Program is based on the level fixed in prior years, the Fire
Services Program budget is essentially the residual obtained by deducting the approved level of funding for the
Emergency Medical Services Program from the budgeted amounts included in the total Fire Department
budget. This budget was submitted to, and duly approved by, the relevant Authority prior to the commencement
of the fiscal year. Income received from Pinellas County Fire Protection Authority and valid program
expenditures for the Fire Services Program for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 are summarized
below.
Total Revenue Received from Pinellas County Fire Protection Authority2,055,358$
Total Fire Service Expenditures for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 201218,833,812$
The Fire Services Program does not currently utilize an equipment reserve.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 143 of 184
Item # 2
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
132
Attachment number 1 \nPage 144 of 184
Item # 2
Financial Trends
Schedule 1Net Assets by Component
Schedule 2Changes in Net Assets
Schedule 2aProgram Revenues by Function/Program
Schedule 3Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
Schedule 4Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
Revenue Capacity
Schedule 5Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property
Schedule 6Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates
Schedule 7Property Tax Levies and Collections
Schedule 8aPrincipal Real Property Taxpayers
Schedule 8bPrincipal Personal Property Taxpayers
Debt Capacity
Schedule 9Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type
Schedule 10Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding
Schedule 11Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt
Schedule 12Legal Debt Margin Information
Schedule 13Pledged-Revenue Coverage
These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City’s current
levels of outstanding debt, and the City’s ability to issue additional debt in the future.
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
STATISTICAL SECTION
This section of the City’s CAFR presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the
information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information say
about the City’s overall financial health. This information has not been audited by the independent
auditor.
These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the City’s financial
performance and well-being changed over time.
These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the City’s significant local revenue,
the property tax.
133
Attachment number 1 \nPage 145 of 184
Item # 2
Economic and Demographic Information
Schedule 14Demographic and Economic Statistics
Schedule 15Principal Employers
Operating Information
Schedule 16Full-time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function/Program
Schedule 17Operating Indicators by Function/Program
Schedule 18Capital Assets Statistics by Function/Program
These schedules offer economic and demographic indicators to help the reader understand the
environment within which the City’s financial activities take place.
These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the
information in the City’s financial report relates to the services the City provides and the activities it
performs.
Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in this section is derived from the City’s
comprehensive annual financial reports for the relevant year.
STATISTICAL SECTION (CONTINUED)
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
134
Attachment number 1 \nPage 146 of 184
Item # 2
20
0
3
20
0
4
20
0
5
20
0
6
20
0
7
20
0
8
20
0
9
201020112012
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
Go
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
I
n
v
e
s
t
e
d
i
n
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
a
s
s
e
t
s
,
n
e
t
o
f
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
d
e
b
t
a
10
3
,
0
1
5
$
1
3
3
,
7
1
1
$
1
4
3
,
5
0
5
$
1
8
2
,
4
7
4
$
2
0
5
,
0
7
9
$
2
1
8
,
3
8
4
$
2
4
0
,
5
5
0
$
2
4
9
,
0
4
3
$ 257,542$ 254,581$
R
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
5
3
,
9
3
9
5
0
,
8
0
1
3
4
,
6
6
8
4
1
,
2
0
4
4
1
,
5
4
3
3
9
,
0
2
0
4
2
,
6
8
1
4
9
,
6
8
2
57,245 60,764
U
n
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
6
2
,
5
9
9
6
1
,
1
6
3
9
2
,
7
3
9
1
0
0
,
2
3
4
1
0
8
,
2
6
2
1
1
4
,
2
4
7
1
0
3
,
5
5
6
9
3
,
2
8
3
79,955 80,208
To
t
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
n
e
t
a
s
s
e
t
s
2
1
9
,
5
5
3
$
2
4
5
,
6
7
5
$
2
7
0
,
9
1
2
$
3
2
3
,
9
1
2
$
3
5
4
,
8
8
4
$
3
7
1
,
6
5
1
$
3
8
6
,
7
8
7
$
3
9
2
,
0
0
8
$ 394,742$ 395,553$
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
-
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
I
n
v
e
s
t
e
d
i
n
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
a
s
s
e
t
s
,
n
e
t
o
f
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
d
e
b
t
1
0
5
,
8
2
4
$
1
3
6
,
9
6
4
$
1
4
6
,
4
7
6
$
1
5
6
,
7
2
8
$
1
6
4
,
2
4
6
$
1
7
0
,
7
3
5
$
1
5
8
,
1
2
9
$
1
6
5
,
7
0
4
$ 159,913$ 163,316$
R
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
3
3
,
4
1
3
3
7
,
1
0
8
3
5
,
3
5
4
3
5
,
0
5
4
3
5
,
7
7
5
3
9
,
6
3
5
4
1
,
3
3
3
4
4
,
3
3
2
55,038 55,204
U
n
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
9
0
,
7
6
9
6
7
,
7
2
3
7
1
,
6
5
5
7
7
,
4
3
5
8
4
,
0
2
1
8
3
,
6
8
1
1
2
0
,
4
6
1
1
2
6
,
2
0
4
136,067 151,693
To
t
a
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
-
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
n
e
t
a
s
s
e
t
s
2
3
0
,
0
0
6
$
2
4
1
,
7
9
5
$
2
5
3
,
4
8
5
$
2
6
9
,
2
1
7
$
2
8
4
,
0
4
2
$
2
9
4
,
0
5
1
$
3
1
9
,
9
2
3
$
3
3
6
,
2
4
0
$ 351,018$ 370,213$
Fi
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
(a
m
o
u
n
t
s
i
n
t
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
)
Schedule 1
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
,
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
Ne
t
A
s
s
e
t
s
b
y
C
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
,
La
s
t
T
e
n
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
s
(a
c
c
r
u
a
l
b
a
s
i
s
o
f
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
)
135
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
I
n
v
e
s
t
e
d
i
n
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
a
s
s
e
t
s
,
n
e
t
o
f
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
d
e
b
t
2
0
8
,
8
3
9
$
2
7
0
,
6
7
5
$
2
8
9
,
9
8
1
$
3
3
9
,
2
0
2
$
3
6
9
,
3
2
5
$
3
8
9
,
1
1
9
$
3
9
8
,
6
7
9
$
4
1
4
,
7
4
7
$ 417,455$ 417,897$
R
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
8
7
,
3
5
2
8
7
,
9
0
9
7
0
,
0
2
2
7
6
,
2
5
8
7
7
,
3
1
8
7
8
,
6
5
5
8
4
,
0
1
4
9
4
,
0
1
4
112,283 115,968
U
n
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
1
5
3
,
3
6
8
1
2
8
,
8
8
6
1
6
4
,
3
9
4
1
7
7
,
6
6
9
1
9
2
,
2
8
3
1
9
7
,
9
2
8
2
2
4
,
0
1
7
2
1
9
,
4
8
7
216,022 231,901
To
t
a
l
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
n
e
t
a
s
s
e
t
s
4
4
9
,
5
5
9
$
4
8
7
,
4
7
0
$
5
2
4
,
3
9
7
$
5
9
3
,
1
2
9
$
6
3
8
,
9
2
6
$
6
6
5
,
7
0
2
$
7
0
6
,
7
1
0
$
7
2
8
,
2
4
8
$ 745,760$ 765,766$
a
F
i
s
c
a
l
2
0
0
3
a
n
d
2
0
0
4
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
i
n
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
v
e
s
t
e
d
i
n
n
e
t
a
s
s
e
t
s
,
n
e
t
o
f
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
d
e
b
t
w
e
r
e
d
u
e
t
o
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
ct
i
o
n
o
f
a
s
p
r
i
n
g
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
s
p
o
r
t
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
(
$
2
8
.
9
mi
l
l
i
o
n
)
,
a
n
e
w
m
a
i
n
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
(
$
1
7
.
2
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
)
,
d
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
io
n
c
e
n
t
e
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
(
$
5
.
8
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
)
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
w
o
n
e
w
f
i
r
e
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
$
3
.
6
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
)
o
v
e
r
t
h
e
t
w
o
-
y
e
a
r
p
e
r
i
o
d
.
T
h
e
f
i
s
c
a
l
20
0
6
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
w
a
s
d
u
e
t
o
t
h
e
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
t
r
o
a
c
t
i
v
e
i
n
f
r
as
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
of
G
A
S
B
S
t
a
t
e
m
en
t
#
3
4
,
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
$
3
6
.
3
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
o
f
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
as
s
e
t
s
.
135
Attachment number 1 \nPage 147 of 184
Item # 2
20
0
3
20
0
4
20
0
5
20
0
6
20
0
7
20
0
8
20
0
9
201020112012
Go
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
1
1
,
3
5
3
$
1
1
,
7
7
2
$
1
1
,
9
4
5
$
1
3
,
2
0
3
$
1
3
,
1
6
9
$
1
4
,
3
4
2
$
1
3
,
5
1
5
$
1
5
,
9
6
6
$ 16,183$ 14,230$
P
u
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
4
7
,
4
2
9
5
1
,
4
5
4
5
6
,
4
5
6
6
0
,
1
7
8
6
8
,
6
3
6
6
6
,
5
8
2
6
4
,
9
7
7
6
9
,
4
5
7
66,914 67,559
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
2
,
2
7
1
2
,
6
8
4
2
,
8
2
6
3
,
0
9
8
3
,
0
2
7
2
,
7
3
0
4
,
2
6
6
4
,
9
4
1
3,868 3,189
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
8
,
8
7
8
1
2
,
5
1
0
1
2
,
0
0
1
1
3
,
8
9
8
1
3
,
6
9
4
1
2
,
3
2
2
9
,
5
9
5
1
3
,
7
6
0
13,275 13,432
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
4
,
2
8
8
3
,
2
2
5
3
,
3
9
5
3
,
3
2
1
3
,
1
4
2
4
,
5
3
4
3
,
9
2
4
4
,
1
5
5
3,113 2,240
H
m
a
n
s
e
r
i
c
e
s
57
1
55
5
53
0
44
4
44
8
44
0
40
2
97182186
(a
m
o
u
n
t
s
i
n
t
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
)
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
s
Schedule 2
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
,
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
Ch
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
N
e
t
A
s
s
e
t
s
La
s
t
T
e
n
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
s
(a
c
c
r
u
a
l
b
a
s
i
s
o
f
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
)
Pa
g
e
1
o
f
3
Fi
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
H
u
m
a
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
5
7
1
5
5
5
5
30
4
4
4
4
4
8
4
4
0
4
02
97 182 186
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
2
2
,
0
9
4
2
5
,
4
0
2
2
8
,
8
7
5
3
2
,
6
3
6
3
2
,
8
7
2
3
7
,
6
8
8
2
8
,
7
4
0
3
0
,
6
1
0
30,606 32,814
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
o
n
l
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
d
e
b
t
3
,
2
8
4
3
,
0
1
3
2
,
6
9
9
2
,
3
7
3
2
,
2
4
8
1
,
9
9
8
1
,
8
5
0
1
,
4
4
6
1,217 709
To
t
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
1
0
0
,
1
6
8
1
1
0
,
6
1
5
1
1
8
,
7
2
7
1
2
9
,
1
5
1
1
3
7
,
2
3
6
1
4
0
,
6
3
6
1
2
7
,
2
6
9
1
4
0
,
4
3
2
135,358 134,359
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
-
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
W
a
t
e
r
a
n
d
s
e
we
r
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
4
0
,
8
2
5
4
1
,
9
9
5
4
3
,
8
5
2
4
8
,
5
9
2
4
9
,
8
4
0
5
2
,
0
1
5
5
4
,
5
2
0
5
7
,
2
2
9
61,010 59,406
G
a
s
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
2
6
,
6
3
8
2
9
,
1
5
2
3
3
,
3
9
4
3
6
,
9
4
7
3
3
,
5
7
9
3
5
,
9
4
4
2
9
,
2
8
5
3
1
,
2
0
0
28,354 27,662
S
o
l
i
d
w
a
s
t
e
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
1
4
,
2
3
2
1
5
,
0
9
6
1
5
,
6
1
5
1
6
,
0
1
3
1
6
,
1
7
2
1
6
,
0
3
6
1
4
,
8
0
1
1
5
,
6
1
8
15,844 16,632
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
7
,
0
2
2
8
,
2
5
0
8
,
7
6
8
9
,
0
1
3
9
,
4
6
5
1
1
,
0
7
0
1
1
,
7
7
5
1
0
,
9
3
7
12,234 12,847
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
2
,
1
6
5
2
,
3
8
8
2
,
5
7
4
2
,
5
7
9
2
,
8
9
5
3
,
2
0
7
2
,
5
1
8
2
,
7
5
9
2,954 2,855
M
a
r
i
n
e
3
,
0
6
0
3
,
2
4
9
3
,
8
0
1
4
,
3
0
3
4
,
3
6
6
4
,
6
9
6
4
,
0
2
5
3
,
8
6
8
4,136 4,168
A
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
2
1
1
2
9
9
3
5
0
4
6
8
3
8
2
4
1
7
7
4
3
3
8
8
515 366
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
3
,
2
8
1
3
,
6
1
7
3
,
8
4
6
3
,
9
7
6
3
,
4
2
7
3
,
5
2
1
3
,
7
5
2
4
,
3
0
2
3,867 4,200
H
a
r
b
o
r
v
i
e
w
c
e
n
t
e
r
2
,
5
2
5
2
,
4
1
8
2
,
5
5
2
2
,
6
1
8
2
,
6
6
4
2
,
8
0
0
2
,
3
4
5
9
8
4
579 610
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
H
a
r
b
o
r
M
a
r
i
n
a
-
-
-
-
-
2
3
4
7
4
4
7
3
657 726
To
t
a
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
-
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
9
9
,
9
5
9
1
0
6
,
4
6
4
1
1
4
,
7
5
2
1
2
4
,
5
0
9
1
2
2
,
7
9
0
1
2
9
,
7
2
9
1
2
4
,
2
3
8
1
2
7
,
7
5
8
130,150 129,472
To
t
a
l
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
2
0
0
,
1
2
7
$
2
1
7
,
0
7
9
$
2
3
3
,
4
7
9
$
2
5
3
,
6
6
0
$
2
6
0
,
0
2
6
$
2
7
0
,
3
6
5
$
2
5
1
,
5
0
7
$
2
6
8
,
1
9
0
$ 265,508$ 263,831$
136
Attachment number 1 \nPage 148 of 184
Item # 2
20
0
3
20
0
4
20
0
5
20
0
6
20
0
7
20
0
8
20
0
9
201020112012
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
f
o
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
b
12
,
2
6
8
$
1
2
,
9
6
1
$
1
3
,
5
8
5
$
1
4
,
6
2
8
$
1
4
,
5
0
8
$
2
1
,
6
3
9
$
2
1
,
6
7
9
$
2
1
,
4
8
4
$ 20,869$ 20,401$
P
u
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
7
,
9
6
0
7
,
7
4
2
7
,
5
0
0
8
,
2
2
2
8
,
4
4
4
9
,
8
0
3
1
0
,
2
9
1
8
,
9
6
6
9,980 9,265
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
1
8
0
7
6
1
1
9
1
5
0
1
2
3
9
1
2
4
9
3
3
1
147 77
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
1
2
6
1
5
9
1
6
3
2
3
5
2
6
1
1
9
4
3
9
7
8
5
7
852 885
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
9
1
8
7
1
6
4
1
1
0
1
0
7
1
0
8
2
1
1
1
2
4
153 122
H
u
m
a
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
3
,
1
9
1
4
,
3
4
4
4
,
7
5
3
5
,
2
9
6
5
,
5
7
4
5
,
3
1
8
5
,
3
3
4
5
,
1
7
4
5,491 5,474
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
g
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
8
,
2
6
7
6
,
6
0
5
6
,
2
7
3
7
,
1
8
1
9
,
6
8
7
9
,
1
2
3
8
,
5
4
2
7
,
5
6
1
8,062 8,521
Fi
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
(a
m
o
u
n
t
s
i
n
t
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
)
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
Schedule 2 (continued)
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
,
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
Ch
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
N
e
t
A
s
s
e
t
s
La
s
t
T
e
n
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
s
(a
c
c
r
u
a
l
b
a
s
i
s
o
f
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
)
Pa
g
e
2
o
f
3
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
g
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
5
,
2
0
7
3
,
1
2
9
1
5
,
0
5
8
3
,
4
0
5
1
1
,
7
4
8
7
,
6
3
2
3
,
1
6
9
1
,
3
1
5
2,766 845
To
t
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
37
,
2
9
6
3
5
,
1
0
3
4
7
,
6
1
5
3
9
,
2
2
7
5
0
,
4
5
2
5
3
,
9
0
8
4
9
,
8
7
2
4
5
,
8
1
2
48,320 45,590
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
-
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
f
o
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
:
W
a
t
e
r
a
n
d
s
e
w
e
r
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
3
9
,
2
0
7
4
3
,
1
4
3
4
5
,
3
0
6
4
9
,
1
5
9
5
0
,
3
8
1
5
2
,
1
1
1
5
3
,
9
6
5
5
5
,
8
0
1
59,810 62,012
G
a
s
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
3
0
,
0
6
4
3
3
,
0
0
1
3
7
,
4
6
9
4
3
,
1
6
0
3
8
,
9
0
6
4
0
,
9
0
2
3
9
,
0
7
9
3
6
,
6
2
2
36,470 36,351
S
o
l
i
d
w
a
s
t
e
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
1
5
,
9
6
0
1
6
,
4
0
3
1
6
,
5
4
1
1
6
,
8
1
6
1
7
,
3
0
1
1
7
,
5
1
2
1
7
,
8
4
7
1
8
,
4
2
2
19,205 19,462
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
8
,
4
8
5
9
,
5
2
6
1
0
,
3
1
9
1
1
,
1
3
8
1
1
,
8
8
5
1
2
,
7
7
0
1
3
,
4
9
3
1
4
,
7
1
7
15,222 15,890
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
2
,
4
2
7
2
,
6
4
9
2
,
7
8
4
2
,
7
4
0
3
,
2
0
4
3
,
4
1
1
2
,
2
2
7
2
,
6
9
5
3,135 2,681
M
a
r
i
n
e
2
,
9
4
9
3
,
0
7
2
3
,
7
2
1
4
,
0
7
5
4
,
3
2
3
4
,
7
9
8
4
,
0
3
1
4
,
0
6
4
4,387 4,181
A
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
1
7
6
1
8
7
2
0
5
2
1
3
2
2
4
2
2
7
2
1
6
3
3
2
237 257
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
4
,
0
0
3
4
,
4
1
8
4
,
7
5
2
4
,
9
8
1
4
,
6
5
5
4
,
1
6
6
5
,
0
0
7
4
,
3
5
8
4,677 4,890
H
a
r
b
o
r
v
i
e
w
c
e
n
t
e
r
1
,
6
6
1
1
,
6
5
4
1
,
6
4
6
1
,
8
4
2
1
,
8
4
6
2
,
0
3
2
1
,
6
4
1
4
4
0
51 209
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
H
a
r
b
o
r
M
a
r
i
n
a
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
0
4
4
325 467
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
g
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
1
4
4
2
0
5
9
5
9
8
3
8
3
8
3
1
8
7
133 134
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
g
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
9
,
4
0
6
5
,
5
9
1
6
,
1
3
8
6
,
6
3
9
6
,
3
8
2
1
,
0
8
6
2
,
6
0
9
1
1
,
0
6
0
5,290 7,469
To
t
a
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
-
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
11
4
,
3
5
2
1
2
0
,
0
6
4
1
2
8
,
9
4
0
1
4
0
,
8
2
2
1
3
9
,
1
9
0
1
3
9
,
0
9
8
1
4
0
,
2
4
8
1
4
8
,
7
4
2
148,942 154,003
To
t
a
l
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
pr
o
g
r
a
m
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
15
1
,
6
4
8
$
1
5
5
,
1
6
7
$
1
7
6
,
5
5
5
$
1
8
0
,
0
4
9
$
1
8
9
,
6
4
2
$
1
9
3
,
0
0
6
$
1
9
0
,
1
2
0
$
1
9
4
,
5
5
4
$ 197,262$ 199,593$
137
Attachment number 1 \nPage 149 of 184
Item # 2
20
0
3
20
0
4
20
0
5
20
0
6
20
0
7
20
0
8
20
0
9
201020112012
Ne
t
(
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
)
/
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
Go
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
(
6
2
,
8
7
2
)
$
(
7
5
,
5
1
2
)
$
(
7
1
,
1
1
2
)
$
(
8
9
,
9
2
4
)
$
(
8
6
,
7
8
4
)
$
(
8
6
,
7
2
8
)
$
(
7
7
,
3
9
7
)
$
(
9
4
,
6
2
0
)
$ (87,038)$ (88,770)$
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
-
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
1
4
,
3
9
3
1
3
,
6
0
0
1
4
,
1
8
8
1
6
,
3
1
3
1
6
,
4
0
0
9
,
3
6
9
1
6
,
0
1
0
2
0
,
9
8
4
18,792 24,531
To
t
a
l
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
n
e
t
(
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
)
/
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
(
4
8
,
4
7
9
)
$
(
6
1
,
9
1
2
)
$
(
5
6
,
9
2
4
)
$
(
7
3
,
6
1
1
)
$
(
7
0
,
3
8
4
)
$
(
7
7
,
3
5
9
)
$
(
6
1
,
3
8
7
)
$
(
7
3
,
6
3
6
)
$ (68,246)$ (64,239)$
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
O
t
h
e
r
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
N
e
t
A
s
s
e
t
s
Go
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
T
a
x
e
s
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
3
3
,
9
2
7
$
3
7
,
1
5
7
$
4
1
,
5
8
8
$
4
8
,
0
7
6
$
5
3
,
7
1
7
$
5
0
,
3
4
7
$
4
6
,
8
9
3
$
4
4
,
0
4
0
$ 39,253$ 37,938$
S
a
l
e
s
1
4
,
5
2
9
1
5
,
2
6
3
1
6
,
3
5
1
1
7
,
1
5
5
1
6
,
0
7
9
1
5
,
6
7
5
1
3
,
8
5
0
1
3
,
2
5
3
13,385 14,092
F
r
a
n
c
h
i
s
e
a
7,
1
4
0
7
,
5
0
5
8
,
2
2
6
9
,
4
3
5
9
,
5
0
5
-
-
-
- -
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
1
0
,
3
6
3
1
0
,
2
3
7
1
0
,
6
1
1
1
1
,
2
6
4
1
1
,
4
1
0
1
1
,
5
3
3
1
2
,
0
2
1
1
3
,
5
7
4
13,229 12,736
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
7
,
0
1
9
6
,
7
9
0
6
,
8
8
3
6
,
8
5
4
6
,
7
8
4
7
,
3
1
6
6
,
3
9
8
6
,
1
0
7
5,852 5,871
O
t
h
e
r
t
a
x
e
s
b
3,
9
7
4
4
,
4
3
5
5
,
1
8
3
5
,
5
2
3
5
,
7
7
9
8
,
1
5
4
7
,
5
8
1
7
,
7
7
3
7,451 7,105
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
s
2
,
1
8
8
3
,
2
3
1
2
,
6
4
8
5
,
3
5
2
7
,
4
0
2
5
,
8
3
7
8
,
6
3
5
5
,
0
1
5
2,965 2,758
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
16
8
75
8
15
1
39
6
13
1
43
7
11
3
128125101Schedule 2 (continued)
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
,
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
Ch
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
N
e
t
A
s
s
e
t
s
La
s
t
T
e
n
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
s
(a
c
c
r
u
a
l
b
a
s
i
s
o
f
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
)
Pa
g
e
3
o
f
3
Fi
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
(a
m
o
u
n
t
s
i
n
t
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
)
138
Mi
sc
e
ll
an
e
o
u
s
16
8
75
8
15
1
39
6
13
1
43
7
11
3
128 125 101
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
i
t
e
m
s
c
5,
8
1
0
1
0
,
0
4
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
5
,
4
4
3
4
,
5
1
5
4
,
7
0
7
3
,
6
5
8
6
,
9
4
8
4
,
1
9
6
(
2
,
9
5
8
)
9
,
9
5
1
7,511 8,980
To
t
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
9
0
,
5
6
1
9
9
,
9
3
8
9
6
,
3
4
8
1
0
7
,
7
1
3
1
1
7
,
7
5
5
1
0
3
,
4
9
5
9
2
,
5
3
3
9
9
,
8
4
1
89,771 89,581
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
-
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
s
2
,
1
4
8
1
,
9
8
7
2
,
2
1
0
4
,
3
4
1
5
,
3
7
3
4
,
3
1
3
6
,
9
0
4
5
,
2
8
4
3,497 3,644
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
(
5
,
4
4
3
)
(
4
,
5
1
5
)
(
4
,
7
0
7
)
(
3
,
6
5
8
)
(
6
,
9
4
8
)
(
4
,
1
9
6
)
2
,
9
5
8
(
9
,
9
5
1
)
(7,511) (8,980)
To
t
a
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
-
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
(
3
,
2
9
5
)
(
2
,
5
2
8
)
(
2
,
4
9
7
)
6
8
3
(
1
,
5
7
5
)
1
1
7
9
,
8
6
2
(
4
,
6
6
7
)
(4,014) (5,336)
To
t
a
l
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
8
7
,
2
6
6
$
9
7
,
4
1
0
$
9
3
,
8
5
1
$
1
0
8
,
3
9
6
$
1
1
6
,
1
8
0
$
1
0
3
,
6
1
2
$
1
0
2
,
3
9
5
$
9
5
,
1
7
4
$ 85,757$ 84,245$
Ch
a
n
g
e
i
n
N
e
t
A
s
s
e
t
s
Go
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
2
7
,
6
8
9
$
2
4
,
4
2
6
$
2
5
,
2
3
6
$
1
7
,
7
8
9
$
3
0
,
9
7
1
$
1
6
,
7
6
7
$
1
5
,
1
3
6
$
5
,
2
2
1
$ 2,733$ 811$
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
-
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
1
1
,
0
9
8
1
1
,
0
7
2
1
1
,
6
9
1
1
6
,
9
9
6
1
4
,
8
2
5
9
,
4
8
6
2
5
,
8
7
2
1
6
,
3
1
7
14,778 19,195
To
t
a
l
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
c
h
a
n
g
e
i
n
n
e
t
a
s
s
e
t
s
3
8
,
7
8
7
$
3
5
,
4
9
8
$
3
6
,
9
2
7
$
3
4
,
7
8
5
$
4
5
,
7
9
6
$
2
6
,
2
5
3
$
4
1
,
0
0
8
$
2
1
,
5
3
8
$ 17,511$ 20,006$
a
F
r
a
n
c
h
i
s
e
f
e
e
s
r
e
c
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
e
d
f
r
o
m
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
t
o
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
f
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
w
i
t
h
f
i
s
c
a
l
2
0
0
8
,
p
e
r
g
u
i
d
a
n
c
e
f
r
o
m
S
t
a
t
e
o
f
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
,
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
B
u
r
e
a
u
o
f
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
.
b
O
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
s
r
e
c
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
e
d
f
r
o
m
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
f
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
L
o
c
a
l
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
T
a
x
(
O
t
h
e
r
T
a
x
e
s
)
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
w
i
t
h
f
i
s
c
a
l
2
0
0
8
,
p
e
r
g
u
i
d
a
n
c
e
f
r
o
m
S
t
a
t
e
o
f
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
,
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
B
u
r
e
a
u
o
f
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
.
c
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
i
t
e
m
s
f
o
r
f
i
s
c
a
l
2
0
0
3
a
n
d
2
0
0
4
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
d
o
f
a
d
o
n
a
t
e
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
a
n
d
a
c
a
s
h
d
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
a
n
e
w
S
p
r
i
n
g
T
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
s
p
o
r
t
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
,
r
e
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
.
No
t
e
:
T
h
e
C
i
t
y
b
e
g
a
n
t
o
r
e
p
o
r
t
a
c
c
r
u
a
l
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
w
h
e
n
i
t
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
GA
S
B
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
3
4
i
n
f
i
s
c
a
l
y
e
a
r
2
0
0
2
.
138
Attachment number 1 \nPage 150 of 184
Item # 2
20
0
3
20
0
4
20
0
5
20
0
6
20
0
7
20
0
8
20
0
9
201020112012
Fu
n
c
t
i
o
n
/
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Go
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
1
2
,
3
4
0
$
1
3
,
0
9
0
$
1
3
,
6
0
5
$
1
4
,
6
9
7
$
1
4
,
5
1
4
$
2
1
,
6
4
0
$
b
21
,
6
8
1
$
2
1
,
5
1
2
$
2
1
,
5
3
3
$ 20,418$
P
u
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
9
,
6
6
1
9
,
0
0
9
9
,
2
0
7
9
,
2
7
5
1
1
,
7
6
3
1
2
,
7
8
4
1
3
,
2
8
4
1
2
,
3
0
9
1
2
,
6
3
1
13,753
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
1
,
1
1
8
7
9
6
4
4
8
1
,
2
7
4
7
0
4
6
9
5
3
0
4
3
6
0
3
4
4
327
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
3
,
9
8
2
2
,
0
0
3
1
4
,
0
5
6
a
2,
3
0
0
1
0
,
4
9
1
6
,
6
2
8
1
,
8
5
2
2
,
0
2
4
2
,
6
5
1
1,436
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
4
,
0
2
8
2
,
6
2
9
2
,
4
2
5
2
,
7
0
8
3
,
2
9
8
2
,
8
4
4
3
,
3
2
7
1
,
9
8
2
2
,
4
4
4
1,687
H
u
m
a
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
1
1
180
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
6
,
1
6
1
7
,
5
7
6
7
,
8
7
4
8
,
9
7
3
9
,
6
8
2
9
,
3
1
7
9
,
4
2
4
7
,
6
2
5
8
,
5
0
6
7,789
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
3
7
,
2
9
6
3
5
,
1
0
3
4
7
,
6
1
5
3
9
,
2
2
7
5
0
,
4
5
2
5
3
,
9
0
8
4
9
,
8
7
2
4
5
,
8
1
2
4
8
,
3
2
0
45,590
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
-
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
W
a
t
e
r
a
n
d
s
e
w
e
r
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
4
3
,
1
2
0
4
6
,
3
5
7
4
7
,
6
5
6
5
2
,
2
6
4
5
6
,
0
7
1
5
2
,
8
0
7
5
5
,
2
9
1
6
3
,
4
2
6
6
3
,
5
6
6
68,812
Ga
s
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
30
0
6
4
33
0
0
1
37
4
6
9
43
1
6
0
38
9
0
6
40
9
0
2
39
0
7
8
366723647036351Schedule 2a
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
,
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
b
y
F
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
/
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
La
s
t
T
e
n
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
s
(a
c
c
r
u
a
l
b
a
s
i
s
o
f
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
)
Fi
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
(a
m
o
u
n
t
s
i
n
t
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
)
139
Ga
s
ut
i
l
i
t
y
30
,06
4
33
,00
1
37
,46
9
43
,16
0
38
,90
6
40
,90
2
39
,07
8
36,672
36,470 36,351
S
o
l
i
d
w
a
s
t
e
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
1
5
,
9
7
4
1
6
,
8
2
3
1
6
,
5
4
1
1
6
,
8
1
6
1
7
,
3
0
1
1
7
,
5
1
2
1
7
,
8
4
7
1
8
,
4
2
2
1
9
,
2
0
5
19,462
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
1
3
,
4
1
1
1
1
,
1
5
8
1
4
,
0
6
1
1
4
,
3
4
3
1
2
,
5
5
9
1
2
,
9
4
1
1
4
,
4
7
8
1
5
,
6
8
2
1
6
,
5
2
3
15,961
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
2
,
4
2
7
2
,
6
4
9
2
,
8
4
3
2
,
7
9
9
3
,
2
8
7
3
,
4
9
3
2
,
3
1
0
2
,
7
7
9
3
,
2
1
8
2,764
M
a
r
i
n
e
2
,
9
5
3
3
,
7
5
0
3
,
7
2
1
4
,
1
2
8
4
,
3
2
3
4
,
8
1
0
4
,
0
3
1
4
,
0
6
4
4
,
3
8
7
4,259
A
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
7
3
9
2
5
3
2
5
1
4
8
9
2
4
2
3
3
5
3
6
5
4
9
1
4
5
4
776
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
4
,
0
0
3
4
,
4
1
8
4
,
7
5
2
4
,
9
8
1
4
,
6
5
5
4
,
2
6
6
5
,
1
5
7
4
,
3
6
4
4
,
6
7
7
4,890
H
a
r
b
o
r
v
i
e
w
c
e
n
t
e
r
1
,
6
6
1
1
,
6
5
5
1
,
6
4
6
1
,
8
4
2
1
,
8
4
6
2
,
0
3
2
1
,
6
4
1
4
4
0
5
1
209
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
H
a
r
b
o
r
M
a
r
i
n
a
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
0
2
,
4
0
2
3
9
1
518
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
-
t
y
p
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
1
1
4
,
3
5
2
1
2
0
,
0
6
4
1
2
8
,
9
4
0
1
4
0
,
8
2
2
1
3
9
,
1
9
0
1
3
9
,
0
9
8
1
4
0
,
2
4
8
1
4
8
,
7
4
2
1
4
8
,
9
4
2
154,002
To
t
a
l
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
1
5
1
,
6
4
8
$
1
5
5
,
1
6
7
$
1
7
6
,
5
5
5
$
1
8
0
,
0
4
9
$
1
8
9
,
6
4
2
$
1
9
3
,
0
0
6
$
1
9
0
,
1
2
0
$
1
9
4
,
5
5
4
$
1
9
7
,
2
6
2
$ 199,592$
y
e
a
r
2
0
0
2
.
a I
n
2
0
0
5
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
a
$
1
0
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
r
e
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
g
r
a
n
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
f
o
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
n
e
w
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
C
a
u
s
e
w
a
y
B
r
i
d
g
e
.
b
F
r
a
n
c
h
i
s
e
f
e
e
s
r
e
c
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
e
d
f
r
o
m
G
en
e
r
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
t
o
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
f
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
w
i
t
h
f
i
s
c
a
l
2
0
0
8
,
p
e
r
g
u
i
d
a
n
c
e
f
r
o
m
S
t
a
t
e
o
f
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
,
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
of
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
B
u
r
ea
u
o
f
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
.
No
t
e
:
T
h
e
C
i
t
y
b
e
g
a
n
t
o
r
e
p
o
r
t
a
c
c
r
u
a
l
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
wh
e
n
i
t
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
G
A
S
B
St
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
3
4
i
n
f
i
s
c
a
l
139
Attachment number 1 \nPage 151 of 184
Item # 2
20
0
3
20
0
4
20
0
5
20
0
6
20
0
7
20
0
8
20
0
9
20
1
0
20
1
1
c2012
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
:
N
o
n
s
p
e
n
d
a
b
l
e
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
2
4
$
2
5
$
R
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
5
6
1
,
0
4
3
U
n
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
3
,
0
8
1
2
2
,
0
3
4
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
2
,
6
1
8
2
,
7
6
2
3
,
0
6
4
2
,
9
4
1
3
,
4
7
6
3
,
5
0
0
3
,
1
6
8
1
,
1
6
4
-
-
U
n
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
1
2
,
0
7
5
1
3
,
0
7
7
1
5
,
5
7
5
2
1
,
4
7
9
2
3
,
5
8
0
1
7
,
5
6
4
1
9
,
1
7
1
2
2
,
9
0
3
-
-
To
t
a
l
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
1
4
,
6
9
3
$
1
5
,
8
3
9
$
1
8
,
6
3
9
$
2
4
,
4
2
0
$
2
7
,
0
5
6
$
2
1
,
0
6
4
$
2
2
,
3
3
9
$
2
4
,
0
6
7
$
2
3
,
9
6
1
$
2
3
,
1
0
2
$
Al
l
O
t
h
e
r
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
:
N
o
n
s
p
e
n
d
a
b
l
e
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
9
0
$
8
7
$ Schedule 3
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
,
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
Fu
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
o
f
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
La
s
t
T
e
n
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
s
(m
o
d
i
f
i
e
d
a
c
c
r
u
a
l
b
a
s
i
s
o
f
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
)
140
R
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
d
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
1
,
9
9
1
6
5
,
6
4
5
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
7
,
1
3
1
1
7
,
3
4
6
A
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
,
4
0
4
8
,
4
8
8
U
n
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(
1
,
9
2
1
)
(
2
,
1
1
9
)
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
3
5
,
5
5
5
2
9
,
4
2
1
3
0
,
0
4
0
3
5
,
3
6
3
4
8
,
7
2
2
3
6
,
6
4
1
3
7
,
2
5
9
2
9
,
9
7
0
-
U
n
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
,
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
i
n
:
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
f
u
n
d
s
1
5
,
1
9
9
1
5
,
3
2
5
1
7
,
3
4
0
1
9
,
6
0
8
1
8
,
6
5
6
1
6
,
4
2
6
1
6
,
8
9
9
1
3
,
9
4
4
-
D
e
b
t
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
f
u
n
d
s
3
0
2
8
2
,
2
4
8
6
4
9
0
1
1
3
1
3
6
7
,
7
2
6
-
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
f
u
n
d
s
2
2
,
2
4
7
1
7
,
7
9
6
2
5
,
4
6
2
2
7
,
7
4
6
1
9
,
2
2
5
4
0
,
6
8
5
b
36
,
7
5
7
3
6
,
2
4
0
-
To
t
a
l
a
l
l
o
t
h
e
r
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
f
u
n
d
s
7
3
,
0
3
1
$
6
2
,
5
7
0
$
7
5
,
0
9
0
$
8
2
,
7
8
1
$
8
6
,
6
9
3
$
9
3
,
8
6
5
$
9
1
,
0
5
1
$
8
7
,
8
8
0
$
8
4
,
6
9
5
$
8
9
,
4
4
7
$
a
T
h
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
f
i
s
c
a
l
2
0
0
2
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
f
u
n
d
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
i
s
p
r
i
m
a
r
i
l
y
d
u
e
t
o
a
n
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
f
u
n
d
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
f
o
r
e
n
c
u
m
b
r
a
n
c
e
s
f
r
om
$
7
.
1
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
i
n
f
i
s
c
a
l
2
0
0
1
t
o
$
3
5
.
0
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
i
n
f
i
s
c
a
l
2
0
0
2
,
a
s
a
r
e
s
u
l
t
o
f
m
a
j
o
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
n
e
w
m
a
i
n
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
a
n
d
n
e
w
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
C
a
u
s
e
w
a
y
B
r
i
d
g
e
.
A
l
s
o
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
n
g
w
a
s
a
$
1
0
.
5
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
f
u
n
d
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
f
o
r
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
s
a
n
d
n
o
t
e
s
,
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
i
n
t
e
r
f
u
n
d
l
o
a
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
f
u
n
d
f
o
r
a
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
b
e
a
c
h
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
a
g
e
,
a
l
o
n
g
w
i
t
h
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
f
o
r
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
m
o
r
t
g
a
g
e
n
o
t
e
r
e
c
e
i
v
a
b
l
e
s
.
b
T
h
e
f
i
s
c
a
l
2
0
0
8
u
n
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
f
u
n
d
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
f
o
r
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
s
d
u
e
t
o
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
o
f
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
n
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
o
f
p
r
o
j
ec
t
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
.
c
G
A
S
B
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
N
o
.
5
4
w
a
s
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
1
a
n
d
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
s
n
e
w
f
u
n
d
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
c
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
2
0
1
1
.
T
h
e
n
e
w
c
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
ha
v
e
n
o
t
b
e
e
n
r
e
s
t
a
t
e
d
f
o
r
2
0
1
0
a
n
d
p
r
i
o
r
.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 152 of 184
Item # 2
20
0
3
20
0
4
20
0
5
20
0
6
20
0
7
20
0
8
20
0
9
201020112012
To
t
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
:
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
a
x
e
s
3
3
,
9
2
7
$
3
7
,
1
5
7
$
4
1
,
5
8
8
$
4
8
,
0
7
6
$
5
3
,
7
1
7
$
5
0
,
3
4
7
$
4
6
,
5
7
9
$
4
4
,
0
9
7
$ 39,290$ 37,954$
S
a
l
e
s
t
a
x
e
s
8
,
6
6
2
9
,
1
2
0
9
,
9
7
8
1
0
,
7
0
5
9
,
9
3
1
9
,
8
6
3
8
,
5
7
4
7
,
9
8
7
7,929 8,393
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
t
a
x
e
s
1
0
,
3
6
3
1
0
,
2
3
7
1
0
,
6
1
1
1
1
,
2
6
4
1
1
,
4
1
0
1
1
,
5
3
3
1
2
,
0
2
0
1
3
,
5
7
4
13,229 12,735
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
a
x
e
s
a
7,
0
1
9
6
,
7
9
0
6
,
8
8
3
6
,
8
5
4
6
,
7
8
4
6
,
7
4
7
6
,
9
6
6
6
,
1
0
7
5,852 5,871
O
t
h
e
r
t
a
x
e
s
2
,
7
8
0
2
,
8
9
1
3
,
0
0
2
3
,
0
1
6
3
,
0
1
5
3
,
6
6
9
4
,
1
6
7
3
,
6
1
3
3,561 3,308
F
r
a
n
c
h
i
s
e
f
e
e
s
7
,
1
4
0
7
,
5
0
5
8
,
2
2
6
9
,
4
3
5
9
,
5
0
5
9
,
2
5
4
1
0
,
2
0
4
1
0
,
5
4
0
9,994 9,603
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
s
,
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
,
a
n
d
f
e
e
s
2
,
9
0
8
3
,
1
6
8
3
,
6
5
6
4
,
7
8
0
4
,
4
4
1
2
,
7
1
9
1
,
9
1
8
1
,
7
6
6
2,364 2,117
I
n
t
e
r
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
2
5
,
0
7
0
2
2
,
0
8
9
3
6
,
7
0
4
2
5
,
4
0
7
3
4
,
6
2
2
3
1
,
4
7
3
2
7
,
9
7
2
2
5
,
4
0
0
26,693 25,750
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
f
o
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
1
0
,
4
7
1
1
2
,
1
9
8
1
2
,
5
7
0
1
4
,
6
6
9
1
4
,
8
0
6
1
4
,
8
9
5
1
4
,
9
3
3
1
4
,
8
0
3
14,081 14,682
F
i
n
e
s
a
n
d
f
o
r
f
e
i
t
u
r
e
s
2
,
0
7
8
1
,
7
4
2
1
,
2
6
3
1
,
5
5
7
1
,
4
0
1
1
,
2
9
8
1
,
4
7
8
1
,
1
0
1
1,638 985
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
s
2
,
3
0
9
2
,
4
9
1
1
,
7
5
6
3
,
7
8
4
5
,
4
0
0
4
,
1
0
1
5
,
7
6
8
3
,
3
6
0
1,937 1,719
M
i
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
3
,
0
9
7
3
,
2
5
7
2
,
8
1
3
2
,
0
8
9
4
,
1
7
3
4
,
9
6
1
1
,
8
8
0
1
,
7
0
9
2,963 2,016
To
t
a
l
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
1
1
5
,
8
2
4
1
1
8
,
6
4
5
1
3
9
,
0
5
0
1
4
1
,
6
3
6
1
5
9
,
2
0
5
1
5
0
,
8
6
0
1
4
2
,
4
5
9
1
3
4
,
0
5
7
129,531 125,133
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
To
t
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
:
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
1
0
,
5
8
6
1
1
,
1
8
9
1
1
,
3
2
8
1
2
,
5
9
0
1
3
,
3
5
7
1
4
,
1
7
0
1
3
,
6
3
3
1
5
,
6
7
6
15,042 12,764
P
u
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
4
8
,
1
6
2
5
0
,
3
0
3
5
5
,
4
0
5
5
7
,
2
6
5
6
5
,
0
9
9
6
4
,
6
3
6
6
4
,
2
4
2
6
4
,
7
3
4
63,610 64,171
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
2
,
2
8
9
2
,
4
9
8
2
,
7
3
7
3
,
0
3
5
2
,
9
6
4
2
,
6
7
3
4
,
0
8
5
3
,
7
7
7
3,722 3,032
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
6
,
6
7
3
9
,
7
0
2
9
,
6
0
4
1
0
,
2
6
7
1
1
,
1
6
2
9
,
9
5
0
7
,
7
6
8
9
,
1
2
8
8,536 8,332
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
4
,
3
0
7
3
,
2
3
9
3
,
3
9
2
3
,
3
2
4
3
,
1
7
5
4
,
2
1
3
3
,
1
6
6
3
,
0
8
9
2,773 2,470
H
u
m
a
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
5
7
6
5
6
2
5
3
0
4
4
2
4
5
3
4
3
7
4
0
5
1
0
0
180 182
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
Schedule 4
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
,
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
Ch
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
o
f
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
La
s
t
T
e
n
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
s
(m
o
d
i
f
i
e
d
a
c
c
r
u
a
l
b
a
s
i
s
o
f
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
)
141
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
2
2
,
2
5
2
2
4
,
2
2
8
2
5
,
0
1
1
2
8
,
5
4
4
2
9
,
9
3
9
3
0
,
3
1
7
2
7
,
1
1
4
2
5
,
8
8
3
25,198 27,028
D
e
b
t
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
:
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
6
,
9
2
1
7
,
4
8
3
7
,
3
4
5
7
,
2
5
7
7
,
1
9
2
7
,
4
1
4
7
,
8
2
5
1
1
,
6
7
0
9,510 1,049
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
&
i
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
c
o
s
t
s
3
,
1
4
6
2
,
9
2
2
2
,
6
1
0
3
,
0
2
9
b
1,
9
9
9
1
,
7
2
8
1
,
6
1
7
1
,
3
3
9
856 548
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
o
u
t
l
a
y
3
2
,
2
7
2
1
9
,
8
5
9
1
0
,
2
5
2
9
,
8
3
4
2
4
,
1
2
6
2
1
,
9
7
0
2
2
,
3
1
2
1
0
,
1
4
5
9,165 8,860
T
o
t
a
l
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
1
3
7
,
1
8
4
1
3
1
,
9
8
5
1
2
8
,
2
1
4
1
3
5
,
5
8
7
1
5
9
,
4
6
6
1
5
7
,
5
0
8
1
5
2
,
1
6
7
1
4
5
,
5
4
1
138,592 128,436
Ex
c
e
s
s
(
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
)
o
f
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
o
v
e
r
(
u
n
d
e
r
)
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
(
2
1
,
3
6
0
)
(
1
3
,
3
4
0
)
1
0
,
8
3
6
6
,
0
4
9
(
2
6
1
)
(
6
,
6
4
8
)
(
9
,
7
0
8
)
(
1
1
,
4
8
4
)
(9,061) (3,303)
To
t
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
:
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
i
n
2
9
,
2
4
1
2
9
,
8
5
4
2
8
,
2
0
5
3
5
,
2
5
8
4
7
,
3
3
4
4
2
,
4
8
1
3
8
,
9
5
6
5
2
,
4
8
1
34,908 31,373
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
o
u
t
(
2
4
,
5
8
6
)
(
2
6
,
7
5
0
)
(
2
4
,
1
6
0
)
(
2
9
,
8
5
0
)
(
4
0
,
7
7
9
)
(
3
9
,
0
2
3
)
(
3
1
,
3
1
2
)
(
4
2
,
4
4
0
)
(30,204) (24,491)
S
a
l
e
o
f
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
a
s
s
e
t
s
9
2
5
7
2
0
-
1
2
0
-
-
-
-
- -
L
a
n
d
h
e
l
d
f
o
r
r
e
s
a
l
e
f
r
o
m
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
-
-
-
1
,
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
- -
L
o
n
g
t
e
r
m
d
e
b
t
i
s
s
u
e
d
6
5
1
2
0
1
4
3
9
8
9
5
2
5
4
4
,
3
7
0
5
2
5
-
1,066 314
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
s
o
f
r
e
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
b
o
n
d
s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
P
r
e
m
i
u
m
o
n
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
b
o
n
d
s
i
s
s
u
e
d
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
t
o
r
e
f
u
n
d
e
d
b
o
n
d
e
s
c
r
o
w
a
g
e
n
t
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
To
t
a
l
o
t
h
e
r
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
(
u
s
e
s
)
6
,
2
3
1
4
,
0
2
5
4
,
4
8
4
7
,
4
2
3
6
,
8
0
9
7
,
8
2
8
8
,
1
6
9
1
0
,
0
4
1
5,770 7,196
(1
5
,
1
2
9
)
$
(
9
,
3
1
5
)
$
1
5
,
3
2
0
$
1
3
,
4
7
2
$
6
,
5
4
8
$
1
,
1
8
0
$
(
1
,
5
3
9
)
$
(
1
,
4
4
3
)
$ (3,291)$ 3,893$
De
b
t
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
s
a
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
n
o
n
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
1
0
.
5
%
1
4
.
1
%
8
.
7
%
8
.
5
%
6
.
9
%
6
.
8
%
7
.
4
%
9
.
6
%
8
.
2
%
1
.
4
%
b T
h
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
f
i
s
c
a
l
2
0
0
6
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
a
n
d
i
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
c
o
s
t
s
i
s
d
u
e
t
o
$
7
4
2
t
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
o
f
a
r
b
i
t
r
a
g
e
r
e
b
a
t
e
o
n
t
h
e
2
0
0
1
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
b
o
n
d
s
.
a E
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
1
,
2
0
0
1
,
t
h
e
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
L
e
g
i
s
l
a
t
u
r
e
r
e
p
e
a
l
e
d
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
t
a
x
o
n
t
e
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
d
a
s
i
m
p
l
i
f
i
e
d
t
a
x
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
f
o
r
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
.
Ot
h
e
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
s
(
U
s
e
s
)
Ne
t
C
h
a
n
g
e
i
n
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
141
Attachment number 1 \nPage 153 of 184
Item # 2
Le
s
s
:
Go
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
T
o
t
a
l
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
an
d
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
L
e
s
s
:
Ta
x
a
b
l
e
T
o
t
a
l
A
c
t
u
a
l
V
a
l
u
e
a
s
a
Fi
s
c
a
l
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
I
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
O
t
h
e
r
C
a
p
T
a
x
E
x
e
m
p
t
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
D
i
r
e
c
t
T
a
x
a
b
l
e
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
Ye
a
r
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
i
a
l
b
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
Val
u
e
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
cValueActual Value
20
0
3
5
,
2
9
0
,
8
9
7
$
1
,
4
5
0
,
8
0
5
$
1
0
9
,
8
5
2
$
1
,
0
1
8
,
6
7
0
$
6
2
9
,
5
9
1
$
5
6
,
3
1
9
$
7
2
2
,
7
6
5
$
1
,
7
2
8
,
2
9
1
$
6
,
1
0
5
,
0
7
8
$
5
.
7
5
3
0
7
,
1
8
2
,
4
4
5
$ 85.0%
20
0
4
6
,
0
4
3
,
6
1
1
1
,
5
3
7
,
6
1
2
1
1
6
,
8
2
2
1
,
0
8
3
,
1
8
6
6
1
6
,
8
8
3
6
3
,
7
4
6
9
6
6
,
8
3
0
1
,
8
0
1
,
7
6
5
6
,
6
9
3
,
2
6
5
5
.
7
5
3
0
7
,
8
7
4
,
4
2
9
85.0%
20
0
5
6
,
9
2
3
,
8
6
3
1
,
7
1
4
,
6
8
4
1
3
1
,
5
1
8
1
,
2
0
1
,
4
6
3
6
0
4
,
7
4
7
6
2
,
3
3
9
1
,
2
4
6
,
7
7
9
1
,
9
2
3
,
1
0
8
7
,
4
6
8
,
7
2
7
5
.
7
5
3
0
8
,
7
8
6
,
7
3
8
85.0%
20
0
6
8
,
3
2
5
,
1
3
4
1
,
9
0
2
,
6
2
7
1
5
3
,
0
3
5
1
,
3
2
9
,
2
1
9
6
0
5
,
1
0
2
7
0
,
6
6
5
1
,
6
9
0
,
2
0
8
2
,
0
4
5
,
3
4
3
8
,
6
5
0
,
2
3
1
5
.
7
5
3
0
1
0
,
1
7
6
,
7
4
2
85.0%
20
0
7
1
0
,
9
6
7
,
9
1
0
2
,
2
9
4
,
4
9
2
1
7
8
,
9
8
7
1
,
4
9
9
,
4
3
4
6
3
7
,
3
0
8
6
7
,
4
7
8
2
,
7
6
7
,
0
3
5
2
,
2
2
2
,
3
2
9
1
0
,
6
5
6
,
2
4
5
5
.
2
0
8
8
1
2
,
5
3
6
,
7
5
9
85.0%
20
0
8
1
1
,
3
5
9
,
7
5
2
2
,
3
8
5
,
9
4
3
1
8
7
,
5
5
7
1
,
5
0
0
,
6
3
3
6
4
0
,
3
8
7
7
2
,
9
1
3
2
,
6
9
1
,
2
9
8
2
,
3
0
7
,
1
3
2
1
1
,
1
4
8
,
7
5
5
4
.
6
7
7
7
1
3
,
1
1
6
,
1
8
2
85.0%
20
0
9
9
,
9
6
5
,
5
8
9
2
,
3
5
3
,
5
6
3
1
9
2
,
9
4
0
1
,
5
8
6
,
8
8
2
6
4
5
,
4
6
0
8
9
,
6
8
6
1
,
7
2
1
,
7
7
3
2
,
9
5
1
,
3
5
7
1
0
,
1
6
0
,
9
9
0
4
.
7
2
5
4
1
1
,
9
5
4
,
1
0
6
85.0%
20
1
0
8
,
1
6
3
,
8
9
7
2
,
3
4
6
,
4
6
2
1
8
5
,
3
5
3
1
,
1
5
6
,
8
1
1
6
5
7
,
9
3
3
9
5
,
2
5
9
9
0
7
,
0
8
7
2
,
8
7
8
,
1
3
6
8
,
8
2
0
,
4
9
2
5
.
1
5
5
0
1
0
,
3
7
7
,
0
4
9 85.0%Schedule 5
As
s
e
s
s
e
d
V
a
l
u
e
a
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
,
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
As
s
e
s
s
e
d
V
a
l
u
e
a
n
d
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
A
c
t
u
a
l
V
a
l
u
e
o
f
T
a
x
a
b
l
e
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
La
s
t
T
e
n
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
s
(i
n
t
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
o
f
d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
142
20
1
0
8,
1
6
3
,
8
9
7
2,
3
4
6
,
4
6
2
18
5
,
3
5
3
1,
1
5
6
,
8
1
1
65
7
,
9
3
3
95
,
2
5
9
90
7
,
0
8
7
2,
8
7
8
,
1
3
6
8,
8
2
0
,
4
9
2
5.
1
5
5
0
10,377,049 85.0%
20
1
1
7
,
0
6
9
,
2
3
6
2
,
0
4
3
,
8
1
3
1
6
2
,
5
2
9
9
9
9
,
8
8
4
6
3
0
,
0
4
4
1
1
2
,
8
6
4
4
7
2
,
7
9
3
2
,
6
7
9
,
1
6
7
7
,
8
6
6
,
4
1
0
5
.
1
5
5
0
9
,
2
5
4
,
6
0
0
85.0%
20
1
2
6
,
7
3
2
,
5
8
5
2
,
0
0
1
,
9
4
5
1
4
9
,
1
6
6
9
7
3
,
9
1
7
6
0
9
,
7
0
4
9
4
,
7
5
0
3
9
1
,
6
7
0
2
,
5
7
3
,
4
4
8
7
,
5
9
6
,
9
4
9
5
.
1
5
5
0
8
,
9
3
7
,
5
8
7
85.0%
a P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
a
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
a
t
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
8
5
%
o
f
m
a
r
k
e
t
v
a
l
u
e
t
o
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
c
o
s
t
o
f
s
a
l
e
s
,
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
m
a
r
k
e
t
v
a
lu
e
,
e
t
c
.
b F
l
o
r
i
d
a
S
t
a
t
u
t
e
s
,
1
9
3
.
1
5
5
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
f
o
r
a
n
a
n
n
u
a
l
c
a
p
o
n
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
f
o
r
"
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
"
(
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
q
u
a
l
i
f
y
i
n
g
f
o
r
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
e
x
e
m
p
t
i
o
n
)
.
T
h
e
c
a
p
i
s
t
h
e
l
o
w
e
r
o
f
3
%
o
f
t
h
e
a
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
v
a
l
u
e
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
r
t
h
e
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
i
n
t
h
e
C
o
n
s
u
m
e
r
P
r
i
c
e
I
n
d
e
x
f
o
r
A
l
l
U
r
b
a
n
C
o
n
s
u
m
e
r
s
.
c R
a
t
e
i
s
p
e
r
$
1
,
0
0
0
o
f
a
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
v
a
l
u
e
Attachment number 1 \nPage 154 of 184
Item # 2
Fiscal
YearOperating
GOB Debt
Service
Total
Direct
Pinellas
County
Pinellas
County
Schools
Pinellas
Transit
District
Emergency
Medical
Services
Other
Districts
Downtown
Development
Board a
20035.7530 0.00005.75306.14108.44900.63190.66001.65621.0000
20045.7530 0.00005.75306.14108.24300.63190.66001.65621.0000
20055.7530 0.00005.75306.14108.12200.63770.66001.65571.0000
20065.7530 0.00005.75306.14108.39000.63770.66001.65551.0000
20075.2088 0.00005.20885.47008.21000.60740.63001.63781.0000
20084.6777 0.00004.67774.87307.73100.56010.58321.51210.9651
20094.7254 0.00004.72544.87308.06100.56010.58321.55510.9651
20105.1550 0.00005.15504.87308.34600.56010.58321.51060.9651
20115.1550 0.00005.15504.87308.34000.56010.58321.44100.9651
20125.1550 0.00005.15504.87308.38500.73050.85061.2390 b 0.9651
Source: Pinellas County Property Appraiser
a A separate taxing district established by referendum which affects only downtown properties.
b "Other" includes Pinellas County Planning Council 0.0125; Juvenile Welfare Board 0.8337;
SW Florida Water Management District 0.3928.
Schedule 6
City Direct RatesOverlapping Rates
City of Clearwater, Florida
Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(rate per $1,000 of assessed value)
143
Attachment number 1 \nPage 155 of 184
Item # 2
Fiscal
Year
Taxes Levied for
the Fiscal YearAmount
Percentage
of Levy
Collections in
Subsequent
YearsAmount
Percentage
of Levy
200335,122,516$ 33,835,841$ 96.34142,664$ 33,978,505$ 96.74
200438,506,35437,015,835 96.13125,919 37,141,754 96.46
200542,967,58541,463,597 96.50120,564 41,584,161 96.78
200649,764,77947,957,449 96.3752,923 48,010,372 96.47
200755,506,24853,668,684 96.69136,082 53,804,766 96.93
200852,150,53450,215,870 96.29186,079 50,401,949 96.65
200948,014,74046,405,161 96.65195,716 46,600,877 97.06
201045,469,63843,912,287 96.57141,898 44,054,185 96.89
201140,551,36339,163,100 96.5827,069 39,190,169 96.64
201239,162,29537,874,151 96.71- 37,874,151 96.71
Note1:Discountsareallowedforearlypayment:4%forNovember,3%forDecember,2%forJanuary,and1%for
February. No discount is allowed for payment in March. Penalties are assessed beginning in April.
Note2:Priortofiscalyear2012,thePinellasCountyTaxCollectordidnotallocatedelinquenttaxescollectedbythe
originaltaxyearlevied.Consequently,allcollectionsofdelinquenttaxeswereappliedtotheimmediatelyprecedingtax
year.Beginningwithfiscalyear2012,theTaxCollectorhasallocateddelinquenttaxescollectedbytheoriginaltax
year levied.
Schedule 7
Collected within the Fiscal
Year of the LevyTotal Collections to Date
City of Clearwater, Florida
Property Tax Levies and Collections
Last Ten Fiscal Years
144
Attachment number 1 \nPage 156 of 184
Item # 2
Taxpayer
Taxable
Assessed
ValueRank
Percentage of
Total City
Taxable
Assessed
Value
Taxable
Assessed
ValueRank
Percentage of
Total City
Taxable
Assessed
Value
REAL PROPERTY
Bellweather Prop. LP Ltd.119,775,938$ 11.67%91,974,300$ 11.65%
Crystal Beach Capital LLC75,324,551 21.05%
Taylor, John S. III43,283,00030.60%27,401,70030.49%
Standard Grand Reserve LLC38,350,00040.53%
Centro NP Clearwater Mall37,470,91150.52%
Sand Key Association Ltd.35,750,00060.50%24,000,00050.43%
Sandpearl Resort LLC33,917,23370.47%
ZOM Bayside Arbors Ltd.31,958,92580.45%19,268,000 90.35%
Weingarten Nostat Inc.25,832,00090.36%24,939,600 40.45%
Radsk Assc LTD23,250,000100.32%
California State Teachers27,600,00020.49%
Clearwater Land Co.23,848,70060.43%
St Joe Co 23,549,30070.42%
Northwood Plaza 22,309,10080.40%
Furnary, Stephen J Tre19,200,000100.34%
Total464,912,558$ 6.48%304,090,700$ 5.45%
Source: Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Schedule 8a
City of Clearwater, Florida
Principal Real Property Taxpayers
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
20122003
145
Attachment number 1 \nPage 157 of 184
Item # 2
Taxpayer
Taxable
Assessed
ValueRank
Percentage of
Total City
Taxable
Assessed
Value
Taxable
Assessed
ValueRank
Percentage of
Total City
Taxable
Assessed
Value
PERSONAL PROPERTY
Progress Energy (1)73,432,624$ 117.33%52,567,280$ 210.03%
Verizon Florida LLC (2)49,426,455211.66%69,230,480 113.21%
Bright House Networks LLC (3)15,057,48333.55%11,255,200 42.15%
Publix Super Market10,319,58542.44%
Florida Gas Transmission 8,089,00451.91%
Hyatt Regency Clearwater Beach7,196,74261.70%
Instrument Transformers7,049,40171.66%5,656,53051.08%
Model Screw Products INC6,906,66681.63%
Monin Inc5,343,88991.26%
Sandpearl Resort LLC5,112,921101.21%
GTE Americast 11,812,59032.25%
Bausch & Lomb Inc 5,351,33061.02%
Burdines INC 4,562,58070.87%
TW Entertainment Advance/N4,452,87080.85%
Sheraton Sand Key 3,545,35090.68%
American Tool & Mold, Inc.3,426,470100.65%
Total187,934,770$ 44.35%171,860,680$ 32.79%
Notes:
(1) Progress Energy was Florida Power in 2003
(2) Verizon Florida, Inc. was GTE in 2003
(3) Bright House Networks was Time Warner Entertainment in 2003
Source: Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Schedule 8b
City of Clearwater, Florida
Principal Personal Property Taxpayers
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
20122003
146
Attachment number 1 \nPage 158 of 184
Item # 2
Sp
r
i
n
g
T
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
W
a
t
e
r
/
S
e
w
e
r
G
a
s
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
T
o
t
a
l
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
Fi
s
c
a
l
O
b
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
T
a
x
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
I
n
t
e
r
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
L
o
a
n
s
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
T
a
x
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
o
f
P
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
P
e
r
Ye
a
r
Bo
n
d
s
Bo
n
d
s
Bo
n
d
s
Re
v
e
n
u
e
B
o
n
d
s
Pa
y
a
b
l
e
Le
a
s
e
s
Bo
n
d
s
Bo
n
d
s
Bo
n
d
s
Bo
n
d
s
Le
a
s
e
s
GovernmentIncome (a)Capita (a)
20
0
3
-
$
1
0
,
9
2
5
$
4
1
,
3
4
5
$
1
4
,
6
4
5
$
-
$
1
1
,
6
7
1
$
1
2
7
,
5
0
5
$
2
8
,
0
0
0
$
3
1
,
8
3
5
$
8
0
$
2
,
0
7
5
$
2
6
8
,
0
8
1
$ 7.48%2,436
20
0
4
-
1
0
,
5
9
0
3
6
,
0
7
5
1
4
,
1
8
5
-
1
0
,
6
7
2
1
2
3
,
6
9
0
2
8
,
0
4
0
4
5
,
6
9
5
5
5
2
,
3
5
8
2
7
1
,
3
6
0
7.37%2,460
20
0
5
-
1
0
,
2
4
1
3
0
,
6
1
5
1
3
,
7
2
0
-
9
,
8
9
1
1
1
9
,
4
4
1
2
7
,
7
5
5
4
5
,
7
5
5
2
9
2
,
3
3
0
2
5
9
,
7
7
7
6.73%2,344
20
0
6
-
9
,
8
8
5
2
4
,
9
5
5
1
3
,
2
4
5
-
1
1
,
0
4
7
1
4
1
,
5
2
4
2
6
,
9
3
0
4
4
,
8
3
0
-
1
,
9
0
6
2
7
4
,
3
2
2
6.69%2,480
20
0
7
-
9
,
5
6
5
1
9
,
0
8
0
1
2
,
7
5
5
-
1
0
,
8
4
0
1
3
6
,
9
5
5
2
3
,
0
1
5
4
3
,
8
4
5
-
1
,
3
6
6
2
5
7
,
4
2
1
5.91%2,330
20
0
8
-
1
3
,
0
0
0
1
2
,
9
7
5
1
2
,
2
5
5
-
1
0
,
5
6
0
1
3
2
,
2
9
0
1
8
,
2
4
0
4
2
,
8
3
0
9
,
1
3
5
9
3
2
2
5
2
,
2
1
7
5.46%2,288
20
0
9
-
1
2
,
5
4
5
6
,
6
2
0
1
1
,
7
4
0
-
9
,
2
3
0
1
9
0
,
4
1
5
1
7
,
4
7
0
4
1
,
7
8
0
9
,
1
3
5
6
6
0
2
9
9
,
5
9
5
6.31%2,726
20
1
0
8
5
4
0
11
2
1
0
8
2
7
9
18
5
7
3
0
16
6
9
5
40
7
0
0
63
0
271784574%2524Schedule 9
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
-
T
y
p
e
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
Go
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
,
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
Ra
t
i
o
s
o
f
O
u
t
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
D
e
b
t
b
y
T
y
p
e
La
s
t
T
e
n
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
s
(a
m
o
u
n
t
s
i
n
t
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
,
e
x
c
e
p
t
p
e
r
c
a
p
i
t
a
)
147
20
1
0
-
8,54
0
-
11
,21
0
-
8,27
9
18
5
,73
0
16
,69
5
40
,70
0
-
63
0
271,784 5.74%2,524
20
1
1
-
-
-
1
0
,
6
6
0
-
8
,
7
2
2
1
7
9
,
2
7
5
1
5
,
9
0
0
3
9
,
5
8
0
-
8
0
8
2
5
4
,
9
4
5
5.75%2,365
20
1
2
-
-
-
1
0
,
0
9
0
-
9
,
0
5
8
1
7
4
,
0
8
5
1
5
,
1
0
5
3
7
,
4
9
5
-
7
6
5
2
4
6
,
5
9
8
5.45%2,285
No
t
e
:
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
o
u
t
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
d
e
b
t
c
a
n
b
e
f
o
u
n
d
i
n
t
h
e
n
o
t
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
(a
)
S
e
e
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
1
4
f
o
r
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
i
n
c
o
m
e
a
n
d
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
d
a
t
a
.
T
h
e
s
e
r
a
t
i
o
s
a
r
e
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
u
s
i
n
g
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
i
n
c
o
m
e
f
r
o
m
t
w
o
f
i
s
c
a
l
y
e
a
rs
p
r
i
o
r
,
a
s
n
o
t
e
d
o
n
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
1
4
.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 159 of 184
Item # 2
Percentage of
GeneralPublic ServiceSales TaxActual Taxable
FiscalObligationTax RevenueRevenueValue ofPer
YearBondsBondsBondsTotalProperty (a)Capita (b)
2003-$ 11,005$ 41,345$ 52,350$ 0.73%476$
2004- 10,645 36,075 46,720 0.59%423
2005- 10,270 30,615 40,885 0.47%369
2006- 9,885 24,955 34,840 0.34%315
2007- 9,565 19,080 28,645 0.23%259
2008- 13,000 12,975 25,975 0.20%236
2009- 12,545 6,620 19,165 0.16%174
2010- 8,540 - 8,540 0.08%79
2011- - - - - -
2012- - - - - -
(a) See Schedule 5 for property value data.
(b) Population data can be found in Schedule 14.
Note: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements.
Schedule 10
General Bonded Debt Outstanding
City of Clearwater, Florida
Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(amounts in thousands, except per capita)
148
Attachment number 1 \nPage 160 of 184
Item # 2
Estimated
EstimatedShare of
DebtPercentageOverlapping
Governmental Unit Outstanding Applicable a Debt
Debt repaid with property taxes -$ n/a-$
Other debt
Pinellas County School District State Bonds b 24,760 13.7%3,393
Pinellas County School District Capital Leases21,608 13.7%2,961
Subtotal, overlapping debt 6,354
City direct debt 19,148
Total direct and overlapping debt 25,502$
Sources: Assessed value data used to estimate applicable percentages provided by Pinellas County Property
Appraiser Debt outstanding data is provided by each respective governmental unit.
and businesses of Clearwater. This process recognizes that, when considering the City's ability to issue and repay
long-term debt, the entire debt burden borne by the residents and businesses should be taken into account.
a The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using taxable assessed property values. Applicable
percentages were estimated by determining the portion of another governmental unit's taxable assessed value that
is within the City's boundaries and dividing it by each unit's total taxable assessed value.
schedule estimates the portion of the outstanding debt of those overlapping governments that is borne by the residents
b The School District State Bonds are secured by a pledge of the District's portion of the State-assessed motor vehicle
license tax. The State's full faith and credit is also pledged for the bonds.
(amounts in thousands)
Schedule 11
City of Clearwater, Florida
Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt
As of September 30, 2012
Note: Overlapping governments are those that coincide, at least in part, with the geographic boundaries of the city. This
149
Attachment number 1 \nPage 161 of 184
Item # 2
Total Net Debt
Applicable
Total Net Debtto Limit
FiscalDebtApplicableLegalas Percentage
YearLimitto LimitDebt Marginof Debt Limit
20031,116,032$ 243,518$ 872,514$ 21.82
20041,236,804 249,370 987,434 20.16
20051,395,730 236,154 1,159,576 16.92
20061,631,179 247,706 1,383,473 15.19
20072,028,832 230,639 1,798,193 11.37
20082,128,847 224,224 1,904,623 10.53
20091,942,045 271,594 1,670,451 13.98
20101,672,462 248,800 1,423,662 14.88
20111,982,900 232,771 1,750,129 11.74
20121,911,916 224,409 1,687,507 11.74
Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2012:
Assessed valuation of non-exempt real estate9,559,578$
Debt Limit (20% of assessed valuation per City Charter)1,911,916
Debt applicable to limit:
Revenue bonds236,775$
Capital leases9,823
Less: Amount set aside for repayment
of bonded debt(22,189)
224,409
Legal debt margin 1,687,507$
shall not exceed 20 percent of the current assessed valuation of all real property located in the City.
Note: Per City Charter, the City's indebtedness, to include revenue, refunding, and improvement bonds,
(amounts in thousands)
Schedule 12
City of Clearwater, Florida
Legal Debt Margin Information
Last Ten Fiscal Years
150
Attachment number 1 \nPage 162 of 184
Item # 2
Less:Net
FiscalGrossOperatingAvailable
Year Revenues Expenses Revenues Principal Interest Coverage
20038,662$ -$ 8,662$ 5,100$ 1,882$ 1.24
20049,120 - 9,120 5,270 1,674 1.31
20059,978 - 9,978 5,460 1,432 1.45
200610,704 - 10,704 5,660 1,896 (a)1.42
20079,931 - 9,931 5,875 889 1.47
20089,863 - 9,863 6,105 641 1.46
20098,574 - 8,574 6,355 397 1.27
20107,987 7,987 6,620 132 1.18
2011- - - - - -
2012- - - - - -
20031,115$ -$ 1,115$ 165$ 629$ 1.40
20041,086 - 1,086 460 623 1.00
20051,098 - 1,098 465 614 1.02
20061,107 - 1,107 475 603 1.03
20071,112 - 1,112 490 591 1.03
20081,107 - 1,107 500 577 1.03
20091,104 - 1,104 515 561 1.03
20101,105 - 1,105 530 544 1.03
20111,099 - 1,099 550 526 1.02
20121,098 - 1,098 570 507 1.02
Public Service Tax/Improvement Revenue Bonds (c)
200317,381$ -$ 17,381$ 355$ 506$ 20.19
200417,027 - 17,027 360 496 19.89
200517,493 - 17,493 375 485 20.34
200618,118 - 18,118 385 473 21.12
200718,194 - 18,194 320 464 23.21
200818,280 - 18,280 330 450 23.44
200918,987 - 18,987 340 438 24.40
201019,680 - 19,680 355 425 25.23
201119,081 - 19,081 8,540 (d)291 2.16
2012- - - - - -
(a) Pledged revenues for the Infrastructure Sales Tax Revenue Bonds include the City's share of
revenues derived by Pinellas County, Florida, from the levy and collection of a one-cent
discretionary infrastructure sales surtax pursuant to Section 212.055(2), Florida Statutes, as
amended. Interest for 2006 includes arbitrage rebate of $742,000.
(b) Pledged revenues for the Spring Training Facility Revenue Bonds include payments received
from the State of Florida pursuant to Section 212.20, Florida Statutes, and payments from
Pinellas County, pursuant to an inter-local agreement dated December 1, 2000, along with
related interest earnings.
(c) Pledged revenues for the Improvement Revenue Refunding Bonds, issued October 2001, were
public service taxes. Effective October 1, 2001, the Florida Legislature repealed the public tax
on communications and created a replacement communications services tax. Consequently
the pledged revenues effective October 1, 2001, include both public service taxes and the new
communications services taxes.
(d) Principal payment in 2011 includes an additional principal payment in the amount of $8,170,000
on February 1, 2011 to redeem all outstanding principal as of that date.
Debt Service
Infrastructure Sales Tax Bonds (a)
Spring Training Facility Bonds (b)
Schedule 13
City of Clearwater, Florida
Pledged-Revenue Coverage
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(amounts in thousands)
Page 1 of 2
151
Attachment number 1 \nPage 163 of 184
Item # 2
Less:Net
FiscalGrossOperatingAvailableMaximum
Year Revenues Expenses Revenues Principal Interest Coverage Coverage (a)
Water & Sewer Utility Revenue Bonds
200340,243$ 29,611$ 10,632$ 5,430$ 3,334$ 1.21
200444,193 31,206 12,987 6,575 2,964 1.36
200546,379 32,243 14,136 7,000 2,892 1.43
200651,197 36,546 14,651 7,020 2,711 1.51
200752,815 37,109 15,706 7,115 3,588 1.47
200854,014 38,325 15,689 7,080 3,817 1.44
200956,952 36,305 20,647 7,195 3,773 1.88
201058,220 37,358 20,862 4,685 9,310 1.49
201161,473 40,304 21,169 4,935 9,627 1.45
201263,743 37,851 25,892 5,190 8,008 1.96
Gas Utility Revenue Bonds
200330,373$ 23,729$ 6,644$ 630$ 1,470$ 3.163.05
200433,229 26,316 6,913 675 1,370 3.383.18
200537,797 30,584 7,213 770 1,228 3.613.35
200643,772 34,154 9,618 825 1,195 4.764.47
200739,756 30,483 9,273 855 1,162 4.604.31
200841,582 33,562 8,020 765 741 5.333.73
200939,992 26,813 13,179 770 730 8.796.13
201040,515 28,517 11,998 775 704 8.115.75
201137,021 25,934 11,087 795 678 7.535.16
201236,916 24,919 11,997 795 649 8.315.58
Stormwater Utility Revenue Bonds
20038,660$ 4,727$ 3,933$ 125$ 1,104$ 3.20
20049,680 5,923 3,757 570 1,445 1.86
200510,523 5,754 4,769 580 1,830 1.98
200611,589 6,020 5,569 925 1,906 1.97
200712,458 6,161 6,297 985 1,874 2.20
200813,270 7,038 6,232 1,015 1,845 2.18
200914,231 7,684 6,547 1,050 1,814 2.29
201015,283 6,766 8,517 1,080 1,782 2.98
201115,656 7,917 7,739 1,120 1,741 2.70
201216,364 8,481 7,883 1,155 1,712 2.75
(a) Maximum debt service coverage is presented for continuing disclosure on the Gas System
Debt Service
Revenue Bonds and is based upon the maximum annual debt service for outstanding bonds
and parity bonds.
Schedule 13 (continued)
City of Clearwater, Florida
Pledged-Revenue Coverage
Last Ten Fiscal Years (a)
(amounts in thousands)
Page 2 of 2
152
Attachment number 1 \nPage 164 of 184
Item # 2
YearPopulation (a)
Personal
Income
(thousands of
dollars)
Per Capita
Personal
Income (b)
Median
Age (c )
School
Enrollment (d)
Annual Average
Unemployment
Rate (e)
2003110,0553,586,142$ 32,585$ 43.916,2955.4
2004110,3253,680,552 33,36144.016,3234.7
2005110,8313,858,581 34,81544.215,9643.4
2006110,6024,101,233 37,08144.215,6962.9
2007110,4694,352,147 39,39744.515,5003.8
2008110,2514,621,722 41,92044.515,4825.5
2009109,9074,746,334 43,1854514,97510.1
2010107,6854,736,848 43,98845.314,70412.4
2011107,8054,431,864 41,11046.314,37510.9
2012107,9064,528,167 41,96446.514,2108.7
(a)
(b)
(c )
(d)
(e)
Note:
DataisforPinellasCountyforprioryear.SourceistheUniversityofFlorida,BureauofEconomicand
Business Research.
Source of data is the Pinellas County School District.
Sourceforfiscalyears2003thru2009istheUniversityofFlorida,BureauofEconomicandBusiness
Research,FloridaStatisticalAbstract,AnnualAveragesoftheindicatedfiscalyear.Sourceforfiscal2010
thru 2012 is the US Dept of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Tampa Metro Area as of September 30.
Dataisthelatestpublishedannualdataavailableforanunspecifiedpointineachyear,notspecifically
September 30.
Schedule 14
City of Clearwater, Florida
Demographic and Economic Statistics
Last Ten Fiscal Years
SourceistheUniversityofFlorida,BureauofEconomicandBusinessResearch:April1,2012estimate
for current year and Florida Statistical Abstract for prior years.
Dataisfrom percapitapersonalincome forPinellasCountyfortwoyearsprior.SourceistheUniversity
of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research.
153
Attachment number 1 \nPage 165 of 184
Item # 2
EmployerEmployeesRank
Percentage
of Total
County
Employment EmployeesRank
Percentage
of Total
County
Employment
Pinellas County School District15,895 13.84%
Bay Pines VA Medical Center4,405 21.06%
City of St. Petersburg3,157 30.76%
All Children's Hospital2,900 40.70%
St. Petersburg College2,705 50.65%
Raymond James Financial2,600 60.63%
Pinellas County Sheriff2,580 70.62%
Morton Plant Hospital2,550 80.62%
Mease Hospital2,100 90.51%
Bayfront Medical Center2,025 100.49%
Total Employment b 414,204
a Data is for Pinellas County. City data is not available.
c Data for 2003 is not available.
b Source: Florida Research and Economic Database and Pinellas County Department of Economic Development.
2012 b 2003 c
Schedule 15
City of Clearwater, Florida
Principal Employersa
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
154
Attachment number 1 \nPage 166 of 184
Item # 2
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Function/Program
General government287.0 286.4 287.3 307.5 322.0 327.3 321.6 346.6 326.6 316.5
Public safety
Fire200.0 202.0 202.0 215.0 221.0 212.0 212.0 211.0 205.0 201.0
Police397.6 399.9 405.9 407.9 407.9 393.9 389.9 370.9 344.0 342.5
Physical environment36.0 36.0 36.0 38.7 38.7 34.0 33.5 28.5 27.5 17.5
Transportation73.0 73.0 71.0 74.3 74.3 69.0 67.5 57.5 53.5 52.5
Economic environment64.3 67.3 67.1 69.5 66.5 64.5 62.5 11.0 11.0 8.0
Human services4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 - - -
Culture and recreation
Library83.4 95.9 95.9 94.9 93.9 88.4 78.3 73.2 73.2 73.6
Parks & Rec217.0 241.9 235.4 239.8 240.8 221.8 203.7 191.1 184.1 184.7
Water & Sewer Utility 170.0 169.0 169.0 175.0 175.0 168.0 169.0 164.0 166.0 167.0
Gas Utility 90.0 90.0 90.0 90.0 90.0 90.0 84.0 77.0 77.0 79.0
Solid Waste Utility 106.0 107.5 109.5 112.0 112.0 112.0 112.0 112.0 112.0 112.2
Stormwater Utility40.0 40.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 47.0 46.0 47.0 48.0
Recycling23.5 23.5 23.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3
Marine35.9 35.9 36.4 32.6 18.1 18.6 18.8 17.1 16.1 17.1
Clearwater Harbor Marina 5.6 5.6 5.6
Aviation2.4 2.4 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.4
Parking System14.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.7 20.7 20.7 31.6 31.6 30.8
Total1,844.9 1,895.5 1,900.7 1,951.4 1,954.31,893.61,846.51,766.8 1,703.9 1,679.7
Source: City of Clearwater Office of Management and Budget
Schedule 16
City of Clearwater, Florida
Full-time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function/Program
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Full-time Equivalent Employees as of September 30
155
Attachment number 1 \nPage 167 of 184
Item # 2
20
0
4
20
0
5
2
0
0
6
2
0
0
7
2
0
0
8
2
0
0
9
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
Fu
n
c
t
i
o
n
/
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
i
s
s
u
e
d
1
,
9
0
5
1
,
8
2
2
1
,
8
5
8
2
,
0
0
9
1
,
6
3
9
1
,
3
4
9
1
,
3
6
5
1
,
4
0
0
1,809
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
i
s
s
u
e
d
6
,
4
8
2
7
,
4
8
6
6
,
7
5
9
5
,
3
3
0
4
,
7
7
3
4
,
2
7
3
4
,
7
9
4
5
,
1
0
8
4,946
Pu
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
Po
l
i
c
e
Av
e
r
a
g
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
r
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
h
o
u
r
s
1
4
1
a
15
0
a
55
1
0
5
7
8
8
3
5
1
7
5
83
To
t
a
l
v
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
h
o
u
r
s
1
,
2
2
9
1
,
0
1
7
9
3
2
1
,
0
2
3
1
,
0
0
1
7
3
5
3
9
3
5
5
385
Fi
r
e
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
f
i
r
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
u
n
d
e
r
7
.
5
m
i
n
u
t
e
s
9
2
%
9
1
%
9
0
%
9
1
%
9
2
%
9
6
%
9
0
%
9
2
%
9
5
%
Ph
y
s
i
c
a
l
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
Sq
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
o
f
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
r
e
p
a
i
r
e
d
/
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
5
3
,
5
2
8
3
7
,
0
3
9
4
8
,
4
5
8
8
8
,
0
2
8
6
4
,
2
0
1
4
7
,
0
7
6
5
3
,
1
5
7
4
5
,
1
6
9
45,416
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Mi
l
e
s
o
f
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
r
e
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
d
1
3
1
2
1
0
1
4
1
0
1
0
5
8
8
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
Co
d
e
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
c
a
s
e
s
b
r
o
u
g
h
t
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
9
,
4
3
9
8
,
7
0
1
9
,
7
6
2
8
,
7
9
4
9
,
3
0
0
8
,
5
5
3
6
,
0
2
9
4
,
3
4
6
4,664
Hu
m
a
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Ci
t
y
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
t
h
a
t
m
e
n
t
o
r
i
n
a
r
e
a
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
2
8
3
0
3
8
3
4
2
4
2
0
2
2
1
8
20
Cu
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
Li
b
r
a
r
y
s
y
s
t
e
m
Schedule 17
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
,
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
Op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
I
n
d
i
c
a
t
o
r
s
b
y
F
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
/
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
La
s
t
N
i
n
e
F
i
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
s
*
Fi
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
E
n
d
e
d
S
e
p
t
3
0
:
156
Li
b
r
a
r
y
sy
s
t
e
m
Li
b
r
a
r
y
v
i
s
i
t
s
8
5
4
,
0
0
4
9
7
5
,
5
4
7
9
0
2
,
1
3
5
9
7
9
,
5
4
4
9
7
6
,
9
8
7
8
6
4
,
3
5
0
8
6
0
,
0
4
4
8
3
3
,
0
3
6
820,000
Ci
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
1
,
1
6
4
,
4
2
4
1
,
1
9
0
,
5
7
7
1
,
1
9
3
,
6
3
7
1
,
1
2
1
,
4
8
0
1
,
1
8
1
,
1
8
4 1
,
1
6
1
,
0
5
9
1
,
1
4
7
,
4
2
8
1
,
0
8
7
,
9
7
6
1,058,038
Pa
r
k
s
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
c
e
n
t
e
r
v
i
s
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
1
,
0
9
8
,
4
0
7
1
,
1
0
6
,
2
1
6
6
2
3
,
5
0
0
9
6
7
,
8
1
7
1
,
0
5
0
,
7
8
2
8
6
8
,
4
4
5
7
2
4
,
7
6
9
7
5
9
,
8
0
7
738,577
At
h
l
e
t
i
c
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
v
i
s
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
6
6
,
2
7
6
5
1
1
,
6
2
0
5
1
5
,
1
0
0
4
1
4
,
8
0
5
6
4
3
,
9
9
5
5
4
6
,
4
4
6
5
4
7
,
4
9
2
5
1
5
,
6
6
5
541,433
Wa
t
e
r
a
n
d
S
e
w
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
Wa
t
e
r
c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
4
0
,
2
3
5
4
0
,
1
7
8
4
0
,
4
6
7
4
0
,
4
0
7
4
0
,
1
3
1
3
9
,
9
3
5
3
9
,
9
7
1
4
1
,
3
9
1
41,988
Vo
l
u
m
e
o
f
w
a
t
e
r
p
u
m
p
e
d
(
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
g
a
l
l
o
n
s
/
d
a
y
)
1
3
.
1
5
1
4
.
1
8
1
4
.
0
9
1
2
.
6
6
1
1
.
9
2
1
1
.
5
2
1
0
.
7
6
1
1
.
3
2
10.92
Se
w
e
r
c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
3
3
,
2
3
4
3
3
,
3
0
5
3
3
,
2
7
9
3
3
,
2
5
5
3
3
,
1
4
6
3
3
,
0
8
4
3
3
,
0
4
1
3
3
,
0
6
3
33,093
Mi
l
e
s
o
f
s
e
w
e
r
s
c
l
e
a
n
e
d
1
6
8
1
6
9
1
6
6
1
6
8
9
1
7
6
2
0
8
2
1
5
230
Ga
s
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
1
8
,
4
5
4
1
8
,
5
4
8
1
9
,
0
3
5
1
9
,
4
7
0
1
9
,
5
2
7
1
9
,
5
2
7
1
9
,
5
8
1
1
9
,
8
0
7
20,029
So
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
So
l
i
d
w
a
s
t
e
t
o
n
n
a
g
e
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
a
n
d
d
i
s
p
o
s
e
d
1
3
0
,
9
1
4
1
2
8
,
0
8
0
1
3
2
,
7
4
1
1
3
0
,
3
0
8
1
2
3
,
0
1
8
1
1
2
,
8
5
1
1
1
0
,
9
0
5
1
1
2
,
9
3
6
114,317
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
e
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
9
8
,
6
2
1
9
7
,
6
6
9
9
7
,
2
9
7
9
8
,
5
1
3
9
7
,
9
8
6
9
8
,
4
3
6
9
9
,
5
3
6
1
0
0
,
1
2
5
100,461
Re
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
Ma
r
k
e
t
a
b
l
e
t
o
n
s
r
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
1
4
,
4
4
3
1
4
,
3
2
4
1
4
,
4
3
3
1
4
,
4
9
2
1
4
,
0
0
6
1
2
,
1
1
4
9
,
5
6
4
9
,
2
5
0
8,605
*
N
o
t
e
:
O
n
l
y
n
i
n
e
y
e
a
r
s
o
f
d
a
t
a
a
r
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
.
F
i
s
c
a
l
2
0
1
2
i
s
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
i
f
n
o
t
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
.
N
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
o
r
s
a
r
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
f
o
r
m
a
r
i
n
e
,
a
v
i
a
t
i
o
n
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
,
C
l
e
a
r
w
a
t
e
r
H
a
r
b
o
r
M
a
r
i
n
a
,
a
n
d
H
a
r
b
o
r
v
i
e
w
C
e
n
t
e
r
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
a
Tr
a
i
n
i
n
g
h
o
u
r
s
f
o
r
f
i
s
c
a
l
2
0
0
4
a
n
d
2
0
0
5
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
g
r
a
n
t
-
f
u
n
d
e
d
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
f
o
r
H
o
m
e
l
a
n
d
S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 168 of 184
Item # 2
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Function/Program
Public safety
Fire
Stations7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Police
Stations9 9 10 10 10 9 6 5 6 6
Transportation
Paved streets (miles)304 305 305 305 305 305 313 314 315 316
Culture and recreation
Library system
Volumes in collection (thousands)557 557 570 565 590 601 606 606 601 598
Parks and recreation
Parks acreage1,370 1,370 1,374 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,427 1,427 1,427
Recreational paths (miles)7 7 13 14 16 16 16 16 16 16
Playgrounds31 31 32 33 33 29 29 29 27 27
Baseball and softball fields36 35 35 35 35 32 32 32 32 32
Soccer and football fields17 17 24 25 25 20 20 20 20 20
Recreation centers12 12 7 7 7 7 7 6 5 5
Water & Sewer Utility
Water mains (miles)559 567 567 568 571 575 593 592 592 591
Sanitary sewer mains (miles) 363 363 363 365 368 362 362 363 363 363
Daily treatment capacity
(millions of gallons)29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29
Gas Utility
Gas mains (miles)686 729 753 786 816 814 821 826 830 843
Stormwater Utility
Stormwater mains (miles)147 147 147 148 156 146 148 148 148 150
Marine
Boat slips209 209 209 209 209 209 207 207 207 203
Clearwater Harbor Marina
Boat slips 126 126 126
Aviation
Airpark spaces177 177 177 177 177 177 177 177 177 177
Parking system
Parking spaces3,615 3,653 3,686 3,636 3,322 3,382 3,497 3,297 2,475 a 2,460
a The decrease in parking spaces for fiscal 2011 was loss of Sand Key and some management decision to not charge for certain lots.
Sources: Various city departments
Note: No capital asset indicators are available for the general government, physical environment, economic environment,
human services, solid waste, recycling, and Harborview Center functions.
Schedule 18
City of Clearwater, Florida
Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program
Last Ten Fiscal Years
As of September 30
157
Attachment number 1 \nPage 169 of 184
Item # 2
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
158
Attachment number 1 \nPage 170 of 184
Item # 2
Single Audit /
Grants Compliance
159
Attachment number 1 \nPage 171 of 184
Item # 2
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
160
Attachment number 1 \nPage 172 of 184
Item # 2
161
Attachment number 1 \nPage 173 of 184
Item # 2
162
Attachment number 1 \nPage 174 of 184
Item # 2
163
Attachment number 1 \nPage 175 of 184
Item # 2
164
Attachment number 1 \nPage 176 of 184
Item # 2
FY 2012
Federal Grantor / Federal
Pass-through Grantor / CFDAShare of
Program TitleNumberGrant I.D. NumberExpenditures
FEDERAL AWARDS
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development:
Community Development Block Grant - Entitlement14.218B-09-MC-12-0002 379,229$
14.218B-10-MC-12-0002 889,075
ARRA-Neighborhood Stabilization Program 314.218B-11-MN-12-003124,460
ARRA-Community Development Block Grant Recovery (CDBG-R)14.253B-09-MY-12-00027,776
1,300,540
Home Investment Partnerships Program14.239M-07-MC-12-023056,979
14.239M-08-MC-12-0230363,025
14.239M-09-MC-12-0230263,761
14.239M-10-MC-12-023039,714
14.239Program Income457,871
14.2391,181,350
Passed through Florida Suncoast Housing Partners
Passed through Pinellas County
Neighborhood Stabilization Program 214.25625,836
Total U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 2,507,726
U.S. Department of the Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service:
Clean Vessel Act - Pumpout Vessel15.616 DEP Agreement MV051 CVA 11-614 74,813
Clean Vessel Act - Pumpout Vessel Operation, Maintenance & Repair15.616 DEP Agreement MV051 CVA 11-615 5,514
Total U.S. Department of the Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service 80,327
U.S. Department of Justice:
Federal Forfeiture Sharing16.000FL0520300113,687
Office of Victims of Crimes
Services for Trafficking Victims - Human Trafficking Task Force16.3202010-VT-BX-0022103,798
CATFHT Enhancement Project 201116.3202011-VT-BX-K002110,504
16.320214,302
Bureau of Justice Assistance
Passed Through City of Tampa, FL
Edward Byrne Memorial State & Local Law Enforcement
Discretionary Grants Program
Republican National Convention16.5802012-NC-BX-30701,835,891
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program - Report
Review Team Pilot Program16.7382011-DJ-BX-223974,010
Passed Through FDLE
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program - Patrol
Camera Program16.7382010-JAGC-PINE-5-C4-15829,988
16.738103,998
City of Clearwater, Florida
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
and State Financial Assistance Projects
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
165
Attachment number 1 \nPage 177 of 184
Item # 2
Total U.S. Department of Justice 2,267,878
U.S. Department of Transportation:
Federal Highway Administration
Passed through Florida DEP - OGT:
Recreational trails Program - Lake Chautauqua Trails20.219T102135,970
Recreational Trails Program - Lake Belleview Trail20.219T113415,890
Total U.S. Department of Transportation 51,860
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:
Congressionally mandated Projects - Sanitary Sewer Extension66.202XP-95455010-0167,255
Congressionally mandated Projects - Clarifier Rehab66.202XP-95478811-03,861
66.202171,116
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
ARRA-Brownfields Assessment and Cleanup Cooperative Agreements66.8182B-95427409-090,200
Brownfields Assessment and Cleanup Cooperative Agreements66.818BL-98487299-570
66.81890,270
Total U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 261,386
U.S. Department of Energy:
ARRA-Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program (EECBG)81.128DE-SC0002363134,569
Passed through Florida Office of Energy
ARRA-State Energy Programs81.041ARS007 (DE-EE0000241)66,000
Total U.S. Department of Energy 200,569
Corporation For National and Community Services:
Passed through FL Commission on Community Services
AmeriCorps - 201194.00641,041
AmeriCorps - 201294.006121,870
Total Corporation for National and Community Services 162,911
Total Federal Financial Assistance 5,532,657$
166
Attachment number 1 \nPage 178 of 184
Item # 2
FY 2012
State Grantor / State
Pass-through Grantor / CSFAShare of
Program TitleNumberGrant I.D. NumberExpenditures (a)
STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
Florida Department of Environmental Protection:
Water Protection and Sustainability Program -
Skycrest Reclaimed Water37.066Agreement 07CON000033161,724
Total Florida Department of Environmental Protection 37.066 161,724
Florida Department of Community Affairs:
Florida Housing Finance Corporation
State Housing Initiative Partnership Program (SHIP)52.901 n/a137,113
Total Florida Department of Community Affairs 137,113
Florida Department of Transportation:
Aviation Development Grants -
Install New Security Fencing and Cameras 55.004FPN:415770-1-94-01, Contract APF54 3,143
Multi Plane Hangers55.004FPN:414342-1-94-01; Contract AQ663487,060
Airpark Runway/Taxiway Extension and Rehabilitation55.004FPN:422554-1-94-01; Contract AQJ2850,641
Total Florida Department of Transportation 540,844
Florida Department of Revenue:
Phillies Stadium73.016500,004
Total Florida Department of Revenue 500,004
Total State Financial Assistance 1,339,685$
Total Expenditures of Federal Awards
and State Financial Assistance Projects 6,872,342$
City of Clearwater, Florida
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
and State Financial Assistance Projects - Continued
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
167
Attachment number 1 \nPage 179 of 184
Item # 2
168
City of Clearwater, Florida
Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
and State Financial Assistance Projects
For the Year Ended September 30, 2012
NOTE 1 – Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance Projects
presents the activity of all federal financial and state grant activity projects of the City of Clearwater, Florida
(the “City”). Federal and state financial assistance received directly from federal and state agencies, and
federal financial assistance passed through other governmental agencies are included on the schedules.
The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-133,
Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations and Chapter 10.550, Rules of the
Auditor General.
NOTE 2 – Basis of Accounting
The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance Projects is
presented using the modified accrual or accrual basis of accounting, depending on the type of fund in which
the grant is recorded, as described in Note 1.C. to the City’s basic financial statements.
NOTE 3 – CFDA/CSFA Numbers
CFDA numbers represent Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance and apply only to federal awards. CSFA
numbers represent Catalog of State Financial Assistance and apply only to state financial assistance.
NOTE 4 – Subrecipients
Of the federal and state expenditures presented in the Schedule, the City provided federal and state awards
to subrecipients as follows:
Federal CFDA/ Amount Provided
Program Title State CFSA To Subrecipients
U.S. HUD Community Development Block Grant 14.218 $290,863
U.S. HUD Home Investment Partnerships Program 14.239 $516,734
Florida Housing Finance Corporation, State Housing
Initiative Partnership Program 52.901 $42,428
NOTE 5 – Loans Outstanding
The City had the following loan balances outstanding at September 30, 2011. The current year additions
related to the loans are included in the Schedule of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance.
14.218 Community Development Block Grant $ 2,331,574
14.239 Home Investment Partnership 6,767,943
52.901 State Housing Initiative Partnership 7,035,546
$ 16,135,063
Attachment number 1 \nPage 180 of 184
Item # 2
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
Year Ended September 30, 2012
Section I – Summary of Auditors’ Results
Financial Statements
Type of auditors’ report issued: Unqualified
Internal control over financial reporting:
• Material weakness(es) identified? Yes X No
• Significant deficiency(ies) identified that are
not considered to be material weaknesses? Yes X None reported
Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? _____ Yes X No
Federal and State Awards
Internal control over major programs:
• Material weakness(es) identified? _____ Yes X No
• Significant deficiency(ies) identified that are
not considered to be material weaknesses? _____ Yes X None reported
Type of auditors’ report issued on compliance
for major programs: Unqualified
Any audit findings disclosed that are required
to be reported in accordance with Section 510(a)
Circular A-133? _____ Yes X No
Identification of major programs/projects:
Federal Programs CFDA Number
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development:
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 14.218
ARRA Community Development Block Grant (CDBG-R) 14.253
U.S. Department of Energy:
ARRA Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program 81.128
169
Attachment number 1 \nPage 181 of 184
Item # 2
Federal Programs - Continued CFDA Number
U.S. Department of Justice:
Passed through City of Tampa, FL
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program
- Republican National Convention 16.580
State Programs CSFA Number
Florida Department of Transportation: 55.004
Aviation Development Grants
Florida Department of Revenue: 73.016
Phillies Stadium
The threshold for distinguishing Type A and Type B programs was $300,000 for federal programs and
$300,000 for state projects.
Auditee qualified as low-risk auditee? X Yes No
Section II – Financial Statement Findings
This section identifies the significant deficiencies, material weaknesses, fraud, illegal acts, and instances
of noncompliance related to the financial statements that are required to be reported in accordance with
Government Auditing Standards.
There were no findings required to be reported in accordance with Government Auditing Standards.
Section III – Federal and State Award Findings and Questioned Costs
This section identifies significant deficiencies, material weaknesses, and material instances of
noncompliance, including questioned costs, related to the audit of major federal awards and state financial
assistance projects, as required to be reported by OMB Circular A-133 and Chapter 10.550, Rules of the
Auditor General.
There were no findings required to be reported in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 and Chapter
10.550, Rules of the Auditor General.
Section IV – Summary of Prior Audit Findings
There were no audit findings reported in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs in the prior year.
170
Attachment number 1 \nPage 182 of 184
Item # 2
171
Attachment number 1 \nPage 183 of 184
Item # 2
172
Attachment number 1 \nPage 184 of 184
Item # 2
w fi
Y A
Cit of Clearwater Floriday
2012 Financial Statements
s t i .r l
1 i
k i ; e€:
vt w¢r
Nc" rr t
1ct o i o r',.,,.,,,,,
our ` run de p
x I
f .. `.i .%. 'ti.
7 L
i, -.i '.
t..`
y `\ ;
1y
f
r"° ,,` ,
I 1
Scope of Services
Independent Auditor's Report on Financial Statements (unqualified)
Audit Opinion at the Fund Level
Management's Discussion and Analysis (unaudited)
Basic Financial Statements
Notes to Financial Statements
Required Supplementary Information (unaudited)
Regulatory Items
I nternal Control Report
Compliance Report
q.
r r<, '
R A ...1 1 ..1-.
IVIG111GIyG1 I IGl ll LGIIGI
1
F *}.
Condensed Statement of Net Assets (In Thousands)
September 30, 2012 and 2011
Assets
Current and other assets $
Capital assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities
2012 2011 2012 2011
Total
2012 2011
170,955 165,204 229,378 224,467 400,333 389,671
273,939 277,161 387,040 379,223 660,979 656,384
444,894 442,365 616,418 603,690 1,061,312 1,046,055
Current and other liabilities 7,317 7,287 15,612 15,210 22,929
Long-term liabilities 42,024 40,336 230,593 237,462 272,617
Totalliabilities 49,341 47,623 246,205 252,672 295,546
Net Assets
Invested in capital assets,
net of related debt
Restricted net assets
Unrestricted net assets
Total net assets
254,581 257,542 163,316 159,913 417,897
60,764 57,245 55,204 55,039 115,968
80,208 79,955 151,693 136,066 231,901
395,553 394,742 370,213 351,018 765,766
22,497
277,798
300,295
417,455
112,284
216,021
745, 760
2
0
Condensed Statement of Activities (In Thousands)
Years Ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010
Function / Program Activities
Governmental activities:
General government
Public Safety
Physical environment
Transportation
Economic environment
Human services
Culture and recreation
Interest on long-term debt
Total governmental activities
Business-type activities:
Water and sewer
Gas
Solid waste
Stormwater
Other
Total business-type activities
2012 Totals
2011 Totals
2010 Totals
Expenses
14,230
67, 559
3,189
13,432
2,241
186
32,814
709
134,360
Charges for
Service
20,401
9,265
77
885
122
5,474
36,224
Operating Capital
Grants and Grants and
Contributions Contributions
17 -
4,488 -
134 116
218 333
1, 565 -
180 -
1,919 397
8,521 846
2012 2011 2010
Totals Totals Totals
6,188 5,351 5,547
53,806) (54,284) (57,148)
2,862) (3,524) (4,581)
11,996) (10,623) (11,737)
554) (669) (2,173)
6) 29 (97)
25,024) (22,100) (22,985)
709) (1,217) (1,446)
88,769) (87,037) (94,620)
59,406 62,012 - 6,800 9,406
27,662 36,351 - - 8,689
16,632 19,462 - - 2,830
12,857 15,900 - 72 3,115
12,915 12,674 134 597 490
129,472 146,399 134 7,469 24,530
263,832 182,623 8,655 8,315 (64,239)
265,508 181,012 8,196 8,055 (68,245)
268,190 174,432 7,748 12,375 (73,635)
2,556 6,197
8,116 5,473
3,361 2,804
4,288 4,745
470 1, 766
18,791 20,985
r
3
y
z :
i, '
Condensed Statement of Activities (In Thousands)
Years Ended September 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010
General revenues
Taxes:
Property taxes
Sales tax
Utility taxes
Communication services tax
Other taxes
Investment earnings
Miscellaneous
Total general revenues
Change in net assets
E
2012
37,938
14,092
12,735
5,871
7,105
6,403
101
84,245
1 11:
2011
39,253
13, 385
13,229
5,852
7,451
6,462
125
85, 757
2010
44,040
13,253
13, 574
6,107
7, 773
10,299
128
95,174
17,511 21,539
4et:y
iy
0
s i r w w
a
F"
r
w , a , :.
r ._ .
Adjustments and Control Deficiencies
Adjusting Journal Entries
Audit Adjustment (1)
Passed Adjustments (none)
Control Deficiencies and Management Letter Comments
None reported
i."
5
i ii
d
a
Compliance Audit - Federal and State Single Audit
Federal Programs
o Four (4) Grants Selected for Compliance Testing
State Programs
o Two (2) Grants Selected for Compliance Testing
Results
o No Findings
nt k k.
a h
ues ons.
b
a
s
a r
7
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Provide information on the development of the City’s Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan (PDRP). (WSO)
SUMMARY:
The City began development of a Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan (PDRP) in early 2011 when such a plan was required for all
coastal communities by Rule 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code. Creation of the PDRP is also required by Policy E.4.1.9 of the
City’s Comprehensive Plan. Due to Florida’s vulnerability to a number of regularly occurring natural disasters, particularly hurricanes,
the mandate was viewed as another tool to increase resiliency and decrease vulnerability. In June 2011, the Florida Legislature repealed
Rule 9J-5 in its entirety, and the requirement for coastal communities to develop a PDRP was not integrated into the remaining
provisions in Florida Statutes, Chapter 163. However, the requirement remains in the Comprehensive Plan and development of such a
plan will increase the City’s ability to successfully recover from a disaster.
The purpose of the PDRP is to guide City decision making affecting long-term recovery and redevelopment following a disaster. The
Plan addresses five goals: (1) housing and structural repairs; (2) infrastructure and public facility recovery; (3) environmental
restoration; (4) economic resumption; and (5) land use and development; and includes a concise set of implementable action plans that
aid in achieving these goals. It does not address immediate response and emergency operations, which are already covered by the City’s
Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP).
Disaster management is typically viewed as a cycle with the following overlapping phases: (1) pre-disaster planning and emergency
management preparedness; (2) emergency response; (3) short-term recovery; and (4) long-term recovery and redevelopment. The PDRP
has an implementation role in the pre-disaster phase, but the intent of all the PDRP implementation actions is to improve the
community’s ability for long-term recovery and redevelopment. The PDRP is one component in the local framework for achieving
successful disaster preparedness, response, recovery and redevelopment—it is one part of a larger suite of guiding documents, including
the CEMP, Comprehensive Plan and the countywide Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS).
The PDRP is organized into seven chapters:
1.Introduction
2.Local Plans Integration and Capacity Assessment
3.Vulnerability Analysis
4.Issues
5.Plan Goals
6.Public Communication Plan
7.Plan Maintenance and Implementation
Staff has completed work through Chapter 4 and anticipates completion of the additional three chapters within the next two months. The
PDRP is currently scheduled for approval at the June 19 City Council meeting.
Review Approval:1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Assistant City Manager 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 3
PO
S
T
PO
S
T
-
-
D
I
S
A
S
T
E
R
DI
S
A
S
T
E
R
RE
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
RE
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
W
o
r
k
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
W
o
r
k
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
4.
1
5
.
2
0
1
3
4.
1
5
.
2
0
1
3
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 10
Item # 3
Wh
a
t
i
s
a
P
o
s
t
D
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
Wh
a
t
i
s
a
P
o
s
t
D
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
Re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
(
P
D
R
P
)
?
Re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
(
P
D
R
P
)
?
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
g
u
i
d
e
s
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
g
u
i
d
e
s
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
ma
k
i
n
g
o
n
l
o
n
g
ma
k
i
n
g
o
n
l
o
n
g
-
-
t
e
r
m
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
a
n
d
te
r
m
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
a
n
d
re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
f
t
e
r
a
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
f
t
e
r
a
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
f
t
e
r
a
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
f
t
e
r
a
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
In
c
l
u
d
e
s
c
o
n
c
i
s
e
s
e
t
o
f
In
c
l
u
d
e
s
c
o
n
c
i
s
e
s
e
t
o
f
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
b
l
e
a
c
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
s
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
b
l
e
a
c
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
s
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 10
Item # 3
Di
s
a
s
t
e
r
C
y
c
l
e
Di
s
a
s
t
e
r
C
y
c
l
e
Pr
e
Pr
e
-
-
D
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
Di
s
a
s
t
e
r
Ke
y
Ke
y
Re
s
p
o
n
s
e
Re
s
p
o
n
s
e
Sh
o
r
t
Sh
o
r
t
--Term Term
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Lo
n
g
Lo
n
g
-
-
T
e
r
m
R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
Te
r
m
R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
o
r
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
o
r
Di
s
a
s
t
e
r
Di
s
a
s
t
e
r
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 10
Item # 3
Lo
c
a
l
P
l
a
n
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
D
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
Lo
c
a
l
P
l
a
n
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
D
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
Cy
c
l
e
Cy
c
l
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
Pr
e
-
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
:
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
Lo
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Lo
c
a
l
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
(
L
M
S
)
Lo
c
a
l
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
(
L
M
S
)
Pr
e
-
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
:
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
Attachment number 1 \nPage 4 of 10
Item # 3
Lo
c
a
l
P
l
a
n
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
D
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
Lo
c
a
l
P
l
a
n
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
D
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
Cy
c
l
e
Cy
c
l
e
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
(
C
E
M
P
)
Re
s
p
o
n
s
e
Sh
o
r
t
-te
r
m
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
Sh
o
r
t
-te
r
m
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
Po
s
t
-
D
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
(P
D
R
P
)
Pr
e
-
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
:
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
Lo
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
a
n
d
re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Attachment number 1 \nPage 5 of 10
Item # 3
Pl
a
n
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
Pl
a
n
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
In
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
In
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Lo
c
a
l
P
l
a
n
s
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
&
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
Lo
c
a
l
P
l
a
n
s
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
&
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
As
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
As
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
Vu
l
n
e
r
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
Vu
l
n
e
r
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
Is
s
u
e
s
Is
s
u
e
s
Pl
a
n
G
o
a
l
s
Pl
a
n
G
o
a
l
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
Pu
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
Pl
a
n
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Pl
a
n
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Attachment number 1 \nPage 6 of 10
Item # 3
Pl
a
n
G
o
a
l
s
Pl
a
n
G
o
a
l
s
1.1.
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
a
n
d
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
a
n
d
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
2.2.
In
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
P
u
b
l
i
c
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
In
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
P
u
b
l
i
c
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
3.3.
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
4.4.
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
R
e
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
R
e
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
5.5.
La
n
d
U
s
e
a
n
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
La
n
d
U
s
e
a
n
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Attachment number 1 \nPage 7 of 10
Item # 3
Go
a
l
&
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
Go
a
l
&
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
Go
a
l
1
:
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
n
d
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
Go
a
l
1
:
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
n
d
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
b
l
e
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
b
l
e
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
a
t
i
m
e
l
y
m
a
n
n
e
r
w
h
i
l
e
d
e
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
a
t
i
m
e
l
y
m
a
n
n
e
r
w
h
i
l
e
d
e
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
a
t
i
m
e
l
y
m
a
n
n
e
r
w
h
i
l
e
d
e
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
a
t
i
m
e
l
y
m
a
n
n
e
r
w
h
i
l
e
d
e
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
vu
l
n
e
r
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
t
o
f
u
t
u
r
e
vu
l
n
e
r
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
t
o
f
u
t
u
r
e
di
s
a
s
t
e
r
s
.
di
s
a
s
t
e
r
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
:
S
t
r
e
a
m
l
i
n
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
:
S
t
r
e
a
m
l
i
n
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 8 of 10
Item # 3
Ne
x
t
S
t
e
p
s
Ne
x
t
S
t
e
p
s
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
s
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
s
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
Ch
a
p
t
e
r
s
Ch
a
p
t
e
r
s
Re
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
l
i
z
e
P
l
a
n
Re
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
l
i
z
e
P
l
a
n
Re
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
l
i
z
e
P
l
a
n
Re
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
l
i
z
e
P
l
a
n
Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
Attachment number 1 \nPage 9 of 10
Item # 3
PO
S
T
PO
S
T
-
-
D
I
S
A
S
T
E
R
DI
S
A
S
T
E
R
RE
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
RE
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
W
o
r
k
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
W
o
r
k
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
4.
1
5
.
2
0
1
3
4.
1
5
.
2
0
1
3
Attachment number 1 \nPage 10 of 10
Item # 3
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve request from 1409 Alpine Road, LLC to sell 4 condominium units at $117,000, write-off remainder of HOME loan balance
estimated at $401,131.54, and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
SUMMARY:
On May 19, 2006, the City of Clearwater provided a loan to 1409 Alpine Rd., LLC (Alpine) to purchase and renovate four
condominium housing units located at 1409 Alpine Road, Clearwater (units 1, 2, 5 and 6). There are a total of 16 units in
the condominium complex. The HOME Program funded a loan in the amount of $440,000 which was provided through
1409 Alpine Rd., LLC to purchase, renovate and resell to 4 eligible low to moderate-income families. A breakdown of the
original loan shows that $360,000 was used for acquisition; $14,075.92 was used for settlement costs and $65,924.08 for
renovation costs.
On September 26, 2006, the City modified the original loan to 1409 Alpine Rd., LLC to approve their request for an
additional $40,000 for renovation costs. The City also granted another request from Alpine for an additional $11,216 to pay
for taxes and other costs. All total, the City provided Alpine $491,216 to purchase and renovate four condominium units for
an average cost of $122,804 per unit. An appraisal of a comparable unit (1409 Alpine Rd. Unit 10) at that time showed a
sales approach value of $155,000. The loans were deferred for six months with no payment or interest required. After the
six-month deferment period, the loan was due and payable for the full amount.
After renovations, the units were offered for sale at $154,000. The sales price was later lowered to $129,900 due to a
downturn in the housing market. Due to lack of interest from homebuyers and the HOME Program mandate that requires
the units to meet occupancy guidelines, it was determined that the project should be altered from a homebuyer project to a
rental project and worked with Alpine to try to stabilize the project. In July 2008, Alpine informed the City that two of the
units were going to be rented for $800 each per month through the Clearwater Housing Authority Section 8 Program. The
remaining two units were later rented for the same amount.
Due to problems with maintaining high occupancy levels, Alpine verbally requested the City’s approval to sell the four
condominium units on October 25, 2012. Prior to approval, the City requested an appraisal of the units and complete
financials on all activity from the date of loan approval.
It was later noted that Alpine had moved forward with listing all 4 units with an asking price of $180,000. The listing price
was later lowered to $140,000 and then to $135,000. The highest bid received was $110,000 in which Alpine countered at
$120,000 and the buyer agreed. However, due to some repairs, the buyer requested that Alpine pay half of a $6,000
repairs, which results in a net sales price of $117,000.
An April 24, 2012 appraisal listed the comparable sales price at $25,000 per unit. The value listed through the income
approach was listed at $35,400 per unit.
A review of Alpine’s annual financial statements from 2007 through 2012 shows that revenues were approximately $25,000
a year with expenses slightly exceeding revenues in some years. In summary, there were insufficient funds for debt service
of the city's loan. From the time of loan origination to present, the City has not received any payments on the loan, initiated
foreclosure or modified the loan.
The HUD-1 Settlement Statement lists a contract sales price of $117,000. Through the sales proceeds, Alpine is requesting
that $89,896.46 be provided to the City, $26,830.75 be provided for settlement costs and reimbursements to the managing
member of the LLC: Tampa Bay Community Development Corporation (TBCDC). From a total City investment of $491,216
over six years, the City will net only $89,896.46.
The property has a land use restrictive covenant that mandates that the property be sold to a homebuyer whose income is
less than 80% of area median income. The restrictive agreement will need to be modified to include tenants whose income
is less than 80% of area median income. The affordability period on the restrictive covenant runs to Fiscal Year 2021.
Through a memo received on March 26, 2013, Alpine is requesting that the City approve the sale of the 4 units and write-off
the remaining balance of the loan estimated at $401,131.54. Per City policy, this write-off amount needs City Council
Cover Memo
Item # 4
approval.
As this loan is in default, the City Council has two options to proceed per City policies and HUD regulations:
1) Approve request to sell the 4 units and write-off the HOME loan balance; or
2) Accept Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure for 1409 Alpine Road Units 1, 2, 5, and 6.
Should Council approve the sale and write-off request, it will establish a precedent for writing off loans in which the value of
the property is less than the loan value. Given the downturn in the housing market over the last five years, there are other
city loans in this position where the owners may either request a write-off of their negative equity or a short sale. While this
option creates exposure for the City’s housing programs, it is the most expeditious route to cut the City’s losses on a
homeownership turned rental project that was not successful and is not likely to be successful in the future.
Should the Council accept the Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure, the City would prepare the necessary documents to transfer
ownership, provide settlement costs and reimburse TBCDC for their approved investment in the property. Upon transfer,
the City would secure the vacant units and evaluate options for improvements. The City would then declare the property
surplus, per City Code, and sell the property to the highest responsible bidder. While this option creates the potential for a
higher payout, it creates additional financial burdens and risk given the necessary staff time, upfront funding to prepare the
property for sale, and uncertainty in the real estate market.
After careful review of the options, Staff recommends allowing the sale and write-off of the HOME loan.
Type:Other
Current Year Budget?:None Budget Adjustment:None
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Current Year Cost:Annual Operating Cost:
Not to Exceed:Total Cost:
For Fiscal Year: to
Review Approval:1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Assistant City Manager ED 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 4
TAMPA BAY CDC
MEMORANDUM
TO: City of Clearwater
FROM: GREGORY E. SCHWARTZ, Tampa Bay Community Development Corporation
L. DUKE TIEMAN, Bruce Taylor Realty
RE: 1409 Alpine LLC – Sale of 4 Units
DATE: MARCH 26, 2013
_____________________________________________________________________________
This memorandum serves as a request for the City of Clearwater to approve the sale of 4 units
located at 1409 Alpine Road in Clearwater.
In May 2006, the City of Clearwater requested that Tampa Bay Community Development
Corporation work with them to purchase, renovate and sell four units located at the above-
referenced property. The building (consisting of four units) was purchased in July 2007, using
HOME funds, for a purchase price of $360,000.00 (or $90,000 per unit). It should be noted that
at the time of purchase, the real estate market was extremely active and real estate was selling for
some of its highest prices. It should also be noted that there was a competitive complex located
within one-half mile of this project (Fountain Square), which was selling comparable units for
$98,000 at that time.
The Alpine Association charged a monthly Fee of $251.00 and this was to cover the following
expenses: water, trash, landscaping, maintenance of the exterior of buildings and pest control six
times per year. Unfortunately, the Association did not have sufficient funds to cover these
services, so it ended up that the only services being covered by the monthly fee was water and
trash.
When the units were listed for sale, Duke Tieman was instructed to list them at $135,000 (even
though the real estate market had declined and even though our research showed that Fountain
Square units were then selling for $88,000). We were unable to sell any of the units, so it was
agreed that they be rented for $850/month (and we worked with the Clearwater Housing
Authority to provide assistance through the Section 8 Program).
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 3
Item # 4
City of Clearwater
Sale of Alpine Property
March 26, 2013
Page 2
After the building was purchased, there were several additional expenses incurred by us,
including the following:
a) REPAIR OF THE ROOF OVER THE ENTRYWAY TO THE BUILDING. The
Seller had agreed to repair this, but he did not do it. Because the roof had rotted so badly,
it posed a safety hazard, so we had to repair it ourselves, at our own expense.
b) WATER AND TRASH COLLECTION FOR ALL BUILDINGS. Shortly after the
units were rented out, the City of Clearwater turned off the water in all buildings, due to
non-payment by the Association. For two months, we paid for the water and trash
collection for all buildings (since they were all tied into one water system).
c) NUMEROUS AIR CONDITIONING REPAIRS. These were due to the lawn not
being mowed by the Association causing weeds and high grass to get into the A/C units.
d) REMEDIATION OF MOLD INSIDE UNITS. We made several attempts to remedy
this problem, but it kept returning. We called in a Professional to assist us with the issue
and they discovered that the structural status of the building was changing and cracks on
the outside of the building were getting larger and longer. These structural issues caused
the windows to become loose and moisture was getting into the units. All windows had
to be re-sealed.
e) PLUMBING ISSUES. Moisture from the upstairs laundry room was getting into the
downstairs units and it was discovered that there was leaking plumbing inside the walls
that needed to be repaired.
f) LEGAL COSTS. As tenants have continued to turn over in this complex, we have had
some that have caused problems and had to be evicted. One eviction took 5 months and
we had excessive legal fees.
While incurring these above-referenced maintenance/legal issues, we also found that we had to
reduce the rent (to stay competitive with other complexes in the immediate area). It was reduced
from $850.00 to $800.00. After that, we found that we had difficulty renting the upstairs units.
Because of its proximity to Kings Highway School, Sandy Lane and Dunedin Middle School,
this location was desirable to many of the families being served under the Section 8 Program.
However, because many families had small children, they did not want to be on the second floor
for safety reasons. It was recommended that the rent on the upstairs units be reduced to $750.00.
Because we were working with the Housing Authority/Section 8 Program, we knew that they
would not allow rent to be different in the same building, so the rent on all units was reduced to
$750.00.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 3
Item # 4
City of Clearwater
Sale of Alpine Property
March 26, 2013
Page 3
The property was placed on the market again and it was listed for a price of $140,000. There
were seven potential Buyers, but in the end, two were very interested in the property. The
highest bid we received was $110,000 and we countered at $120,000. The Buyer agreed to that
price subject to an inspection. The inspection was done and the Structural Engineer estimated
the cost of repairs to be $6,000.00. The Buyer initially requested that we incur that cost, which
we refused, and then he agreed to split the cost with us.
We respectfully request you approve this transaction, and please consider the following factors
when making your decision:
a) THIS OFFER IS A CASH OFFER AND READY TO CLOSE IMMEDIATELY.
The Seller has already wired the funds for closing to the Title Company (McFarland,
Gould, et. al).
b) BUYER IS PAYING A PRICE PER UNIT WHICH IS COMPARABLE TO
OTHER UNITS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY. At the price of $120,000, the Buyer is
paying $30,000 per unit. It should be noted that Fountain Square (which is located within
one-half mile) is currently selling their townhouses for $37,000 and their condominium
units for $28,000. Their units are 2 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, and the Alpine units are 2-
bedrooms, 1 bathroom.
c) BUYER IS ACCEPTING THE HIGH ASSOCIATION FEES EVEN THOUGH IT
DOES NOT PROVIDE MANY SERVICES/AMENITIES. As noted earlier, the
monthly fees for the Alpine units are $251.00, and this only covers the cost of water and
trash collection. The Fountain Square residents pay $290.00 months, and while this is
$49 more per month, the fee offers considerably better amenities including a pool,
clubhouse, well-maintained landscaping/lawn service and monthly planned activities.
d) HIGHER CRIME RATES ON ALPINE ROAD. The Clearwater Police Department
has provided us with information on the increase in crime in the area surrounding the
complex. In the last 3 months they have received 235 calls from that area. They have
responded to 2 drug-related calls, 3 criminal mischief calls, 4 shots fired, 12 vehicle
burglaries, 13 stolen vehicles found in that area/complex, 15 breaking and entering theft
calls, 57 investigations of suspicious persons, 5 weapons violations, 13 assault and
battery calls and 19 burglary calls.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact us. Thank
you, in advance, for your positive consideration in this matter.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 3
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 1 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 2 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 3 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 4 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 5 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 6 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 7 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 8 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 9 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 10 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 11 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 12 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 13 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 14 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 15 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 16 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 17 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 18 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 2 \nPage 19 of 19
Item # 4
Attachment number 3 \nPage 1 of 3
Item # 4
Attachment number 3 \nPage 2 of 3
Item # 4
Attachment number 3 \nPage 3 of 3
Item # 4
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve renewal of the City’s Statutory Death Benefits Policy with The Hartford Financial Services Group, providing accidental death
and disability coverages for all full-time Law Enforcement Officers, Firefighters, and applicable Administrators, for the two-year period
retroactive to October 1, 2012 and continuing through September 30, 2014, at a cost of $21,818, pre-paid for the two-year period.
(consent)
SUMMARY:
The City’s policy with The Hartford to provide statutorily required accidental death and disability benefits to sworn Police and Fire
personnel expired on September 30, 2012. The City’s Agent of Record, the Gehring Group, obtained a renewal quote from The Hartford
for a two-year premium rate of $21,818 on a pre-paid basis, an increase of 6.8% from the prior two-year renewal with Hartford. Two
other providers were contacted; AIG declined to submit a quote and Chubb provided a quote that was not competitive. This policy is
effective retroactively for the two-year period from October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2014, provides for a discounted rate
guaranteed for two years, with no annual renewal application requirement and the ability to cancel the policy at any time with no
penalty. Funds are available from a pre-paid account in the City’s Central Insurance Fund.
Appropriation Code Amount Appropriation Comment
0590-00000-155130-000-000-0000 $21,818 2 years pre-paid premium
Review Approval:1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Assistant City Manager 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 5
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Hartford Plaza
Hartford, Connecticut
(A stock insurance company)
Will pay benefits according to
the conditions of this
policy.
Policyholder Name: City of Clearwater
Policyholder Address: P O Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Policy Number: ETB-105344*
Place of Delivery: Clearwater, FL
Policy Effective Date: October 1, 2012
Policy Expiration Date: October 1, 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Schedule
Participating Firms (if any)
Contract Provisions
Definitions
Determination of Individual Coverage
Exclusions
Hazards
Benefits
Claims
Riders (if any)
*This policy replaces the prior policy bearing the above number as of the
effective date of this policy.
Signed for the Company
Terence Shields, Secretary Ronald R. Gendreau, President
Form 7679 A2
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 25
Item # 5
SCHEDULE
ELIGIBLE PERSONS
Class Description
1 All Full-time Law Enforcement Officers of the Policyholder.
2 All Full-time Firefighters of the Policyholder.
Form 7679 B6
BENEFIT DESCRIPTION:
AD means Accidental Death Benefit
Loss Period: 365 days (not applicable to residents of Pennsylvania)
ADD means Accidental Death and Dismemberment Benefit
Loss Period: 365 days
For residents of Pennsylvania, the 365 days loss period is not applicable for loss of life only.
ATD means Accident Total Disability Benefit.
Maximum Payment Period: 104 weeks
REHAB means Rehabilitation Benefit.
Loss Period: 365 days
SBLT means Seat Belt Benefit.
ED means Education Benefit.
SPOED means Spouse Education Benefit.
DCARE means Day Care Benefit.
HAZARDS, BENEFITS, AND AMOUNTS
Class Hazard Benefit Amount
1 C-31 VL118 AD $192,455.70 Unlawful & Intentional Death
ATD $100
DCARE $5,000
ED $5,000
SBLT 5% of Principal Sum to a Maximum of $25,000.
SPOED $5,000
C-62 ADD $65,000 in the Line of Duty
DCARE $5,000
ED $5,000
REHAB 5% of Principal Sum to a Maximum of $25,000.
SBLT 5% of Principal Sum to a Maximum of $25,000.
SPOED $5,000
C-64 AD $65,000 Fresh Pursuit
DCARE $5,000
ED $5,000
SBLT 5% of Principal Sum to a Maximum of $25,000.
SPOED $5,000
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 25
Item # 5
2 C-31 VL118 AD $192,455.70 Unlawful & Intentional death
ATD $100
DCARE $5,000
ED $5,000
SBLT 5% of Principal Sum to a Maximum of $25,000.
SPOED $5,000
C-62 ADD $65,000 in the Line of Duty
DCARE $5,000
ED $5,000
REHAB 5% of Principal Sum to a Maximum of $25,000.
SBLT 5% of Principal Sum to a Maximum of $25,000.
SPOED $5,000
C-64 AD $65,000 Fresh Pursuit
DCARE $5,000
ED $5,000
SBLT 5% of Principal Sum to a Maximum of $25,000.
SPOED $5,000
• The ATD Benefit amount is subject to 80% of salary.
Form 7679 B7
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 25
Item # 5
POLICY PREMIUMS:
Premium Not Subject To Audit: $21,818
Premium Subject To Audit: $0
Total Premium For Policy Period: $21,818
Total Premium Payable on Effective Date
Form 7679 B8
Attachment number 1 \nPage 4 of 25
Item # 5
POLICY MODIFICATIONS: This policy as issued is amended as follows:
1) The definition of injury under this policy is amended to include the following:
a) Any occupational condition or impairment of health of a fireman or any law enforcement officer or
correctional officer caused by tuberculosis, heart disease, or hypertension resulting in death shall be
presumed to be accidental, suffered in the line of duty, and to be a covered injury. To be entitled to this
presumption, the definitions and requirements of Section 112.18 must be met.
b) Any firefighter, paramedic, emergency medical technician, law enforcement officer, or correctional officer
who suffers an occupational condition or impairment of health that is caused by hepatitis, meningococcal
meningitis, or tuberculosis, that requires medical treatment, and that results in death shall be presumed to
have been accidental and to be a covered injury. To be entitled to this presumption, the definitions and
requirements of Sections 112.181 must be met.
c) Any covered firefighter, paramedic, emergency medical technician, law enforcement officer, or correctional
officer who suffers an occupational condition or impairment of health that is caused by exposure to a toxic
substance, adverse results or complications from a smallpox vaccination, or a mental or nervous Injury, that
requires medical treatment, and that results in death shall be presumed to have been accidental and to be
a covered Injury. To be entitled to this presumption, the definitions and requirements of Section 112.1815
must be met.
2) This policy provides accidental death coverage for police officers and firefighters which is no less restrictive
than benefits specified by Florida statutes 112.19, paragraphs 2) a, b, c, f, and j and 112.191, paragraphs 2) a, b, c
and i.
This policy provides a Day Care Benefit if:
a) We pay a death claim for the unlawful and intentional death of the Insured Person;
b) the Insured Person had a Dependent Child under age 11 at the time of death; and
c) proof of enrollment in a Day Care Program is provided as described below.
Payment will be made to the person who has legal physical custody of the dependent child and who has primary
responsibility for the dependent child's expenses. Payment will be made in accordance with the Claims provision of
the Policy.
Proof of enrollment for each child in a Day Care Program may be in the form of, but will not be limited to, the
following:
a) a copy of the child's approval enrollment application in a Day Care Program; or
b) canceled check(s) evidencing payment to a Day Care facility or Day Care provider; or
c) a letter from the Day Care facility or Day Care provider stating that the child is attending within 365 days of
the date of the Insured's death.
Proof of enrollment must be sent to us prior to the last day of the 12th month on or next following the date of the
Insured's death.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 5 of 25
Item # 5
One Day Care Benefit payment will be made each year, for a maximum of 2 Day Care Benefit payments, for each
Dependent Child.
The Day Care Benefit is the lesser amount of:
a) $5,000.00; or
b) the actual cost charged per year by the Day Care Program.
Day Care Program means a program of child care which:
a) is operated in a private home, school or other facility; and
b) provides, and makes a charge for, the care of children; and
c) is licensed as a Day Care center or is operated by a licensed Day Care provider, if such licensing is
required by the state or jurisdiction in which it is located; or
d) if licensing is not required, provides child care on a daily basis for 12 months a year.
Child or Children means the Insured's unmarried child, stepchild, legally adopted child, child in the process of
adoption or foster child who is less than age 11 and primarily dependent on the Insured for support and
maintenance.
This policy provides a Spouse Education Benefit to the Spouse if We pay a death claim for the Insured Person's
unlawful and intentional death.
The Insured Person's Spouse, to qualify for this Education Benefit, must enroll in an Occupational Training program
within one year of the date of the Insured Person's death for the purpose of obtaining an independent source of
income.
The Education Benefit is an amount equal to the lesser of:
a) $5,000.00; or
b) the Expense Incurred for Occupational Training.
The expense must be incurred within 3 years of the date of the Insured Person's death.
We will pay the Education Benefit due immediately after we receive proof that the Insured Person's Spouse has
enrolled in an Occupational Training program.
Occupational Training means any educational, professional, or trade training program which prepares the Insured
Person's Spouse for an occupation for which he or she otherwise would not have been qualified.
Expense Incurred means:
a) the actual tuition charged, exclusive of room and board; and
b) the actual cost of the materials needed;
or the Occupational Training program.
Spouse means the Insured Person's wife or husband who was not legally separated or divorced from the Insured
Person when he or she died.
Form 7679 B10 (FL)2
Attachment number 1 \nPage 6 of 25
Item # 5
CONTRACT PROVISIONS
Entire Contract: The entire contract between the Policyholder and us consists of this policy, and any papers made
a part of this policy at issue.
Changes: No agent has authority to change or waive any part of this policy. To be valid, any change or waiver
must be in writing, approved by one of our officers and made a part of this policy.
Time Periods: All periods begin and end at 12:01 A.M., Standard Time at the place where this policy is delivered.
Certificates: If required by the laws of the state where this policy is delivered, we will give certificates to:
a) the Policyholder; or
b) any other person according to a mutual agreement among the other person, the Policyholder and us;
for delivery to Insured Persons. The certificates will state the features of this policy which are important to Insured
Persons.
Data Furnished by Policyholder: The Policyholder:
a) with our approval, may keep the records which affect this policy;
b) will give us information from those records, when and in the manner we ask.
These records will be open for our inspection at any reasonable time.
Not in Lieu of Worker's Compensation: This policy does not satisfy any requirement for worker's compensation
insurance.
Conformity with State Statutes: On the Policy Effective Date, any part of the policy which is in conflict with a statute
of the state in which the policy is:
a) delivered; or
b) issued for delivery;
is hereby amended to agree with the statute's minimum requirements.
Cancellation: This policy may be cancelled at any time by written notice mailed or delivered by us to the
Policyholder or by the Policyholder to us. If we cancel, we will mail or deliver the notice to the Policyholder at its
last address shown in our records.
If we cancel, it becomes effective on the later of:
a) the date stated in the notice; or
b) the 31st day after we mail or deliver the notice.
If the Policyholder cancels, it becomes effective on the later of:
a) the date we receive the notice; or
b) the date stated in the notice.
In either event:
a) we will promptly return any unearned premium paid; or
b) the Policyholder will promptly pay any earned premium which has not been paid.
Any earned or unearned premium will be determined on a pro rata basis.
Cancellation will not affect any claim for loss due to an accident which occurs before the effective date of the
cancellation.
Form 7679 D1
Attachment number 1 \nPage 7 of 25
Item # 5
CONTRACT PROVISIONS (Continued)
Policy Period: This Policy becomes effective on the Policy Effective Date and continues in force to the end of the
period for which premium was paid unless cancelled at an earlier date. This Policy terminates on the earlier of:
a) the Policy Expiration Date unless continued in force in accordance with the Renewal Provision; or
b) the last day of the period for which premium has been paid subject to the Grace Period.
The Policy Effective Date and Policy Expiration Date are shown:
a) on page 1 for the original Policy Period; and
b) in a Renewal Rider for any Renewal Policy Period.
Renewal: We will send the Policyholder a notice of policy renewal. The Policy will be renewed if the Policyholder
signs and returns the notice prior to the current Expiration Date. If the Policyholder does not receive the notice, the
policy may be renewed if we receive a written request from the Policyholder and a deposit renewal premium of
$350 on or before the current Expiration Date. Once we have received the deposit renewal premium, we will
request information from the Policyholder necessary to calculate the actual renewal premium and either return any
excess premium or bill the Policyholder for the remaining unpaid renewal premium.
However, in no event will this policy be renewed if:
a) we have refused to renew this policy on or before the current Expiration Date;
b) this policy has been cancelled on or before the current Expiration Date; and
c) the Policyholder does not give us, in advance of the current Expiration Date, the information we request.
Premium Due Dates: Each Premium is due in advance of the date the Schedule states that it is payable. If the
Schedule shows an amount for Premium Subject To Audit, the earned premium will be calculated for each date on
which the Policyholder is required to furnish data for determining Units of Exposure. If the earned Premium:
a) is greater than the premium paid, the additional premium is payable on the date we notify the Policyholder
of the amount;
b) is less than the premium paid, we will promptly return the unearned portion of the premium paid.
Grace Period: A Grace Period of 31 days is allowed for payment of each premium due after the initial premium,
unless this policy is cancelled on or before the due date. If the Policyholder has returned the notice of renewal prior
to the Policy Expiration Date, a Grace Period of 31 days from the Policy Expiration Date is allowed for payment of
the renewal premium. This policy will continue in force during the Grace Period. The Policyholder is liable to us for
the payment of Premium accruing for the period this policy continues in force.
Payment: Premiums are to be paid to us by the Policyholder. However, they may be paid to us by any other
person according to a mutual agreement among the other person, the Policyholder and us.
Change of Premiums: We have the right to change the rate at which Premiums will be calculated for each Policy
Period.
Form 7679 D2 (Rev.-1)
Attachment number 1 \nPage 8 of 25
Item # 5
DEFINITIONS
Each term listed, when used in this policy, has the following meaning:
We, us, or our means the insurance company named on page 1.
You, Your, or Insured Person means an Eligible Person while he or she is covered under this policy.
Injury means, and an Insured Person is covered for, bodily injury resulting directly and independently of all other
causes from accident which occurs:
a) while he or she is covered under; and
b) in the manner specified in;
a Hazard applicable to his or her class.
Loss resulting from:
a) sickness or disease, except a pus-forming infection which occurs through an accidental wound; or
b) medical or surgical treatment of a sickness or disease.
is not considered as resulting from injury.
Business Trip means a bona fide trip:
a) while on assignment or at the direction of the Policyholder for the purpose of furthering the business of the
Policyholder;
b) which begins when a person leaves his or her residence or place of regular employment, whichever last
occurs, for the purpose of beginning the trip;
c) which ends when he or she returns to his or her residence or place of regular employment, whichever first
occurs; and
d) excluding travel to and from work, bona fide leaves of absence and vacations.
Trip means a trip which:
a) begins when a person leaves his or her residence or place of regular employment, whichever last occurs,
for the purpose of beginning the trip; and
b) ends when he or she returns to his or her residence or place of regular employment, whichever first occurs.
Passenger means a person who is not:
a) the operator or driver; or
b) the pilot, student pilot, or a crewmember;
of a conveyance at the time of accident.
Common Carrier means a conveyance operated by a concern, other than the Policyholder, organized and licensed
for the transportation of passengers for hire and operated by an employee of that concern.
Form 7679 E1
Attachment number 1 \nPage 9 of 25
Item # 5
DEFINITIONS
Civil Aircraft means a civil or public aircraft which:
a) has an Airworthiness Certificate;
b) is piloted by a person who has:
1) a current pilot certificate with the appropriate aircraft category rating for that aircraft; and
2) a current medical certificate which is appropriate for the operation of that aircraft; and
c) is not operated by the militia, or armed forces of any state, national government or international authority.
Scheduled Aircraft means a Civil Aircraft operated by a scheduled airline which:
a) is licensed by the FAA for the transportation of passengers for hire; and
b) publishes its flight schedules and fares for regular passenger service.
Military Transport Aircraft means a transport aircraft operated by:
a) the United States Air Mobility Command (AMC); or
b) a national military air transport service of any country.
Policyholder Aircraft means an aircraft which is owned, leased, or operated by or on behalf of the Policyholder.
Airworthiness Certificate means a valid and current “Standard Airworthiness Certificate” issued by the FAA.
FAA means:
a) the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States; or
b) the similar aviation authority for the country of the aircraft’s registry, if the country is recognized by the
United States.
Extra-Hazardous Aviation Activity means an aircraft while it is being used for one or more of the following activities:
Acrobatics or Stunt Flying Aerial Photography or Banner Towing
Racing or any Endurance Test Any Test or Experiment
Crop Dusting or Seeding Firefighting
Spraying Any flight which requires:
Exploration a) a special permit; or
Pipe or Power Line Inspection b) waiver;
Any Form of Hunting from the FAA, even though granted.
Bird or Fowl Herding
Form 7679 E2
Attachment number 1 \nPage 10 of 25
Item # 5
DETERMINATION OF INDIVIDUAL COVERAGE
Effective Date: Each Eligible Person becomes an Insured Person on the later of:
a) the Policy Effective Date; or
b) the date he or she enters a Class of Eligible Persons.
Termination: Coverage of each Insured Person terminates on the earlier of:
a) the date this policy terminates; or
b) the date he or she does not qualify in any Class of Eligible Person.
Termination will not affect any claim for loss due to an accident which occurs before the effective date of the
termination.
The Policyholder's failure to report that a person ceased to qualify in a Class of Eligible Persons will not continue
coverage in that Class beyond the date he or she ceased to qualify.
Hazards and Benefits Determined By Class: Each Insured Person is covered under the Hazard and for the
Benefits applicable to the Class in which he or she qualifies:
a) beginning on the date he or she enters the Class; and
b) ending on the date he or she leaves the Class.
If an Insured Person qualifies in more than one Class on the date of accident, he or she will be considered to
qualify in the one Class with the largest Benefit Amount.
Form 7679 F1
Attachment number 1 \nPage 11 of 25
Item # 5
EXCLUSIONS AND AGGREGATE LIMITATION
Exclusions: This policy does not cover any loss resulting from:
1) intentionally self-inflicted Injury, suicide or attempted suicide whether sane or insane, (in Missouri, while
sane);
2) war or act of war, whether declared or undeclared;
3) Injury sustained while in the armed forces of any country or international authority;
Aggregate Limitation: Not Applicable
Form 7679 G1
Attachment number 1 \nPage 12 of 25
Item # 5
HAZARD C-31 V.L. 118
Unlawful and Intentional Death
While on the Business of the Policyholder
Coverage: This Hazard covers death resulting from the unlawful and intentional killing of the Insured Person which
occurs anywhere in the world;
a) in the performance of actual duties; and
b) while on the business of the Policyholder.
The term “while on the business of the Policyholder” as used herein means while on assignment by or at the
direction of the Policyholder whether on or off the premises of the Policyholder, for the purpose of furthering the
business of the Policyholder.
Refer to the Policy Modifications, Definitions and Exclusions sections for modifications, limitations and exclusions
affecting this coverage.
Form 7679 H-31 V.L. 118
Attachment number 1 \nPage 13 of 25
Item # 5
HAZARD C-62
24-Hour Coverage
While on the Business of the Policyholder
Coverage: This Hazard covers Injury resulting from:
a) an accident; and
b) an accident while the Insured Person is a passenger (but not as a pilot, operator or member of the crew)
on, boarding or alighting from a Civil Aircraft or Military Transport Aircraft; or
c) being struck by an aircraft;
which occurs anywhere in the world while On the Business of the Policyholder.
On the Business of the Policyholder means business while on assignment by or at the direction of the Policyholder
whether on or off the premises of the Policyholder for the purpose of furthering the business of the Policyholder.
Refer to the Policy Modifications, Definitions and Exclusions sections for modifications, limitations and exclusions
affecting this coverage.
Form 7679 H-62
HAZARD C-64
Fresh Pursuit Coverage for
Police Officers and Firefighters
While on the Business of the Policyholder
Coverage: This Hazard covers Injury resulting from:
a) for law enforcement, correctional, or correctional probation officers results in Accidental Death that occurs:
1) as a result of the officer's response to fresh pursuit;
2) as a result of the officer's response to what is reasonably believed to be an emergency;
3) at the scene of a traffic accident to which the officer has responded; or
4) while the officer is enforcing what is reasonably believed to be a traffic law
or ordinance.
b) for firefighters, results in Accidental Death as a result of the firefighter's response to what is reasonably
believed to be an emergency involving the protection of life or property.
Fresh Pursuit means the pursuit of a person who has committed or is reasonably suspected of having committed a
felony, misdemeanor, traffic infraction or violation of a county or municipal ordinance. Fresh Pursuit shall not
necessarily imply instant pursuit, but pursuit without reasonable delay.
Refer to the Policy Modifications, Definitions and Exclusions sections for modifications, limitations and exclusions
affecting this coverage.
Form 7679 H-64
Attachment number 1 \nPage 14 of 25
Item # 5
ACCIDENTAL DEATH AND DISMEMBERMENT BENEFIT
If an Insured Person's injury results in any of the following losses within the Loss Period after the date of accident,
we will pay the sum shown opposite the loss.
We will not pay more than the Principal Sum for all losses due to the same accident.
The amount of the Principal Sum and the Loss Period are determined in the Schedule.
For Loss of:
Life....................................................................................................The Principal Sum
Both Hands or Both Feet or Sight of Both Eyes...............................The Principal Sum
One Hand and One Foot..................................................................The Principal Sum
Speech and Hearing.........................................................................The Principal Sum
Either Hand or Foot and Sight of One Eye.......................................The Principal Sum
Movement of Both Upper and Lower Limbs (Quadriplegia).............The Principal Sum
Movement of Both Lower Limbs (Paraplegia).........Three Quarters The Principal Sum
Movement of Both Upper and Lower Limbs
of One Side of the Body (Hemiplegia)........................One Half The Principal Sum
Either Hand or Foot...........................................................One Half The Principal Sum
Sight of One Eye...............................................................One Half The Principal Sum
Speech or Hearing............................................................One Half The Principal Sum
Thumb and Index Finger of Either Hand.....................One Quarter The Principal Sum
Loss means with regard to:
a) hands and feet, actual severance through or above wrist or ankle joints;
b) sight, speech or hearing, entire and irrecoverable loss thereof;
c) thumb and index finger, actual severance through or above the metacarpophalangeal joints.
d) movement of limbs, complete and irreversible paralysis of such limbs.
EXPOSURE
Exposure to the elements will be presumed to be injury if:
a) it results from the forced landing, stranding, sinking or wrecking of a conveyance in which an Insured
Person was an occupant at the time of the accident; and
b) this policy would have covered injury resulting from the accident.
DISAPPEARANCE
An Insured Person will be presumed to have suffered loss of life if:
a) his or her body has not been found within one year after the disappearance of a conveyance in which he or
she was an occupant at the time of its disappearance;
b) the disappearance of the conveyance was due to its accidental forced landing, stranding, sinking or
wrecking; and
c) this policy would have covered injury resulting from the accident.
Form 7679 J3
Attachment number 1 \nPage 15 of 25
Item # 5
SEAT BELT BENEFIT
Coverage: This Benefit covers Injury resulting from Accident which occurs while the Insured Person is:
a) a passenger riding in; or
b) the licensed operator of;
a duly registered Automobile, and while wearing a Seat Belt at the time of the Accident as verified on the police
report of the Accident.
Accident, as used in this Benefit, means the unintentional collision of an Automobile during which the Insured
Person is wearing a Seat Belt.
Automobile means a four-wheeled, private passenger car, station wagon, van or jeep-type vehicle which is not
being used as a Common Carrier.
Seat Belt means a belt, lap restraint or shoulder restraint installed by the manufacturer of the Automobile.
Exclusions: This Benefit does not cover Injury resulting from Accident which:
a) occurs while the Insured Person is under the influence of any intoxicant, excitant, hallucinogen, or any
narcotic or other drug, or similar substance as verified on the police accident report and is operating the
Automobile; or
b) is not a payable Loss under the Accidental Death and Dismemberment Benefit or the Accidental Death
Benefit.
For residents of Minnesota, the above Exclusions are deleted and are replaced by the following:
Exclusions: This Benefit does not cover Injury to an Insured Person who is the operator of an Automobile if such
Injury results from Accident which:
a) was sustained or contracted in consequence of the Insured Person’s being under the influence of any
narcotic unless administered by a physician; or
b) was the result of the Insured Person’s operating the Automobile while under the influence of alcohol as
evidenced by a blood alcohol level in excess of the jurisdiction’s legal intoxication limit; or
c) occurs while the Insured Person is voluntarily taking drugs which federal law prohibits dispensing without a
prescription, including sedatives, barbiturates, amphetamines, or hallucinogens, unless the drug is taken as
prescribed or administered by a licensed physician.
The Seat Belt Benefit Amount is shown in the Schedule. Refer to the Policy Modifications, Definitions and
Exclusions sections for further modifications, limitations and exclusions affecting this coverage.
Form 7679 H-45
Attachment number 1 \nPage 16 of 25
Item # 5
ACCIDENTAL DEATH BENEFIT
If an Insured Person’s injury results in loss of life within the Loss Period after the date of the accident, we will pay
the Principal Sum.
The Principal Sum and the Loss Period are shown in the Schedule.
DISAPPEARANCE
An Insured Person will be presumed to have suffered loss of life if:
a) his or her body has not been found within one year after the disappearance of a conveyance in which he or
she was an occupant at the time of its disappearance;
b) the disappearance of the conveyance was due to its accidental forced landing, stranding, sinking or
wrecking; and
c) this policy would have covered injury resulting from the accident.
Form 7679 L1
ACCIDENT TOTAL DISABILITY BENEFIT
We will pay the Weekly Benefit for each week of an Insured Person's Total Disability. Payment will not exceed the
Maximum Payment Period.
Total Disability must:
a) result from injury;
b) begin within 30 days after the accident; and
c) require the regular care of a legally qualified physician.
For Total Disability of less than one week, one seventh of the Weekly Benefit will be paid per day.
The Weekly Benefit and Maximum Payment Period are shown in the Schedule.
Total Disability: means the Insured Person's inability to perform the duties of his/her occupation for one year and
thereafter unable to perform the substantial duties of any occupation for which he of she is suited by education,
training and experience.
Termination of this policy will not affect any benefits payable under this benefit for any accident that occurred while
the Insured Person was covered under this Policy.
Form 7679 M3
Attachment number 1 \nPage 17 of 25
Item # 5
REHABILITATION BENEFIT
If an Insured Person's injury results in any loss payable under this policy, other than loss of life, within the Loss
Period after the date of accident, we will pay a benefit equal to the lesser of:
a) the Expense Incurred for Rehabilitative Training;
b) a Percentage of the Insured Person’s Principal Sum; or
c) the Maximum Amount;
for Rehabilitative Training.
The expense must be incurred within 2 years of the date of accident.
The Loss Period, the Percentage of Principal Sum and the Maximum Amount are shown in the Schedule.
Rehabilitative Training means any training which:
a) is required due to the Insured Person’s injury;
b) prepares the Insured Person for an occupation in which he or she would not have engaged except for the
injury.
Expense Incurred means the actual cost:
a) of the training; and
b) of the materials needed for the training.
Form 7679 R1
Attachment number 1 \nPage 18 of 25
Item # 5
EDUCATION BENEFIT
If a Principal Sum is payable under the Accidental Death and Dismemberment Benefit because of the Insured
Person's death, We will pay an Education Benefit to each Student as follows:
A Student is a person for whom we receive proof that he or she:
a) is your Dependent on the date of your death; and
b) is a full-time post-high school Student in a school for higher learning on the date of the Insured Person's death;
or
c) became a full-time post-high school Student in a school for higher learning within 365 days after the Insured
Person's death and was a Student in the 12th grade on the date of the Insured Person's death.
He or she is not considered to be a Student after the first to occur of:
a) our payment of the 4th Education Benefit to or on behalf of that person; or
b) the end of the 12th consecutive month during which We have not received proof that he or she is a Student.
The Education Benefit is an amount equal to the lesser of:
a) the Maximum Amount; or
b) the amount determined by applying the Percent to the amount of the Insured Person's Principal Sum.
We will not pay more than one Educational Benefit to any one Student during any one school year.
The Education Benefit is payable to each Dependent Child:
a) on the date; and
b) for whom;
We receive proof that he or she is a Student.
If he or she is a minor, We will pay the benefit to the Student's legal representative.
If:
a) a Principal Sum is payable because of the Insured Person's death; and
b) no Dependent Child qualifies as a Student;
we will pay the Minimum Amount due in accordance with the claim provision for payment of benefits for loss of life.
The Insured Person's amount of the Principal Sum is determined in the Schedule.
The Maximum Amount, Percent of Principal Sum, and Minimum Amount are shown in the Schedule.
Form 7679 T1 (FL)
Attachment number 1 \nPage 19 of 25
Item # 5
CLAIMS
Notice of Claim: The person who has the right to claim benefits (the claimant or beneficiary, or his or her
representative) must give us written notice of a claim within 30 days after a covered loss begins. If notice cannot
be given within that time, it must be given as soon as reasonably possible.
The notice should include the Insured Person's name and the policy number. Send it to our office in Hartford,
Connecticut, or give it to our agent.
Claim Forms: When we receive the notice of claim, we will send forms to the claimant for giving us proof of loss.
The forms will be sent within 15 days after we receive the notice of claim.
If the forms are not received, the claimant will satisfy the proof of loss requirement if a written notice of the
occurrence, character and nature of the loss is sent to us.
Proof of Loss: Proof of loss must be sent to us in writing within 90 days after:
a) the end of a period of our liability for periodic payment claims; or
b) the date of the loss for all other claims.
If the claimant is not able to send it within that time, it may be sent as soon as reasonably possible without affecting
the claim. The additional time allowed cannot exceed one year from the date proof of loss is due, unless the
claimant is legally incapacitated.
Time of Claim Payment: We will pay any daily, weekly or monthly benefit due:
a) on a monthly basis, after we receive the proof of loss, while the loss and our liability continue; or
b) immediately after we receive the proof of loss following the end of our liability.
We will pay any other benefit due immediately, but not more than 60 days, after we receive the proof of loss.
Payment of Claims: We will pay any benefit due for loss of the Insured Person's life:
a) according to the beneficiary designation in effect at the time of his or her death; otherwise;
b) to the surviving child or children and spouse in equal shares; otherwise
c) to the parents or parent.
If there is no survivor in these classes, payment will be made to the Insured Person's estate.
All other benefits due and not assigned will be paid to the Insured Person, if living. Otherwise, the benefits will be
paid according to the preceding paragraph.
Form 7679 Z2 FL Statute
Attachment number 1 \nPage 20 of 25
Item # 5
If a benefit due is payable to:
a) the Insured Person's estate; or
b) the Insured Person or a beneficiary who is either a minor or not competent to give a valid release for the
payment;
we may pay up to $1,000 ($3,000 for residents of Florida) of the benefit due to some other person.
The other person will be someone related to the Insured Person or the beneficiary by blood or marriage who we
believe is entitled to the payment. We will be relieved of further responsibility to the extent of any payment made in
good faith.
Physical Examinations and Autopsy: While a claim is pending we have the right at our expense:
a) to have the Insured Person who has a loss examined by a physician when and as often as is reasonably
necessary; and
b) in case of death to make an autopsy, where it is not forbidden by law.
Legal Actions: You cannot take legal action against us:
a) before 60 days following the date proof of loss is sent to us;
b) after 3 years (6 years for residents of South Carolina) following the date proof of loss is due (for Florida
residents, after the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations following the date proof of loss is due).
Naming a Beneficiary: The Insured Person may name a beneficiary or change a revocably named beneficiary by
giving your written request to the Policyholder. His or her request takes effect on the date you execute it,
regardless of whether he or she is living when the Policyholder receives it. We will be relieved of further
responsibility to the extent of any payment we made in good faith before the Policyholder received his or her
request.
Assignment: We will recognize any assignment the Insured Person makes under this policy, provided:
a) it is duly executed; and
b) a copy is on file with us.
We and the Policyholder assume no responsibility for the validity or effect of an assignment.
Form 7679 Z3
Attachment number 1 \nPage 21 of 25
Item # 5
SCHEDULE
RIDER #1
This rider forms a part of Policy Number ETB-105344 issued to City of Clearwater and all certificates given in
connection with the Policy.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This rider becomes effective on the later of:
1) October 1, 2010; or
2) the effective date of the policy or certificate to which this rider is attached.
Family Medical Benefit
If a covered individual suffers a catastrophic injury or loss of life in the line of duty that is payable under this policy,
and such loss is a result of:
1) an act of violence committed by another person while the insured is engaged in the performance of
your duties;
2) an assault under riot conditions; or
3) the insured’s response to fresh pursuit, the insured’s response to what is reasonably believed to be an
emergency, or an unlawful act perpetrated by another;
this rider provides an annual reimbursement for the Insured Person’s dependents' health insurance premium for the
specified duration and up to the specified annual maximum.
Notwithstanding the Payment of Claims Provision, payment under this benefit is made to the Policyholder for the
benefit of the Insured Person’s dependents.
Catastrophic injury means a permanent impairment constituted by:
a. Spinal cord injury involving severe paralysis of an arm, a leg, or the trunk;
b. Amputation of an arm, a hand, a foot, or a leg involving the effective loss of use of that appendage;
c. Severe brain or closed-head injury as evidenced by:
1. Severe sensory or motor disturbances;
2. Severe communication disturbances;
3. Severe complex integrated disturbances of cerebral function;
4. Severe episodic neurological disorders; or
5. Other severe brain and closed-head injury conditions at least as severe in nature as any
condition provided in subparagraphs 1.-4.;
d. Second-degree or third-degree burns of 25 percent or more of the total body surface or third-
degree burns of 5 percent or more to the face and hands;
e. Total or industrial blindness; or
f. Any other injury that would otherwise qualify under this chapter of a nature and severity that would
qualify an employee to receive disability income benefits under Title II or supplemental security
income benefits under Title XVI of the federal Social Security Act as the Social Security Act existed
on July 1, 1992, without regard to any time limitations provided under that act.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 22 of 25
Item # 5
Dependent means:
1. The Insured Person’s spouse or domestic partner who is not legally separated or divorced from the
Insured individual on the date of the accident; and
2. The Insured Person’s dependent child until the end of the calendar year in which he or she reaches the
age of 25, and
a. at the time of the Insured Person’s death, the child was dependent upon him or her for support; and
b. the surviving child continues to be dependent for support, or the surviving child is a full-time or part-
time student and is dependent for support.
We must receive Proof of Loss, in accordance with the provisions of the Policy within 12 months of the Insured
Person’s death.
The benefit amount will be the lesser of:
a. $5,000; or
b. the annual actual cost of the dependents’ health insurance premium;
each year, for a maximum of 5 years.
Proof of payment of health insurance premium must be submitted annually.
If, within that 5-year period, the Insured Person’s:
1) spouse dies or remarries; or
2) dependent child is no longer dependent for support, dies or reaches the end of the calendar year in
which he or she reaches the age of 25,
the benefit will not longer be payable for that person’s portion of the health insurance premium, and the benefit
amount shall be re-determined. The re-determined amount will be based on the health insurance premiums of the
dependents eligible for this benefit at the time of re-determination.
In all other respects, the policy and certificates remain the same.
Signed for Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company.
Ricardo A. Anzaldua, Secretary John C. Walters, President
Form PA-9408
Attachment number 1 \nPage 23 of 25
Item # 5
Privacy Policy and Practices of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. and its Affiliates
(herein called “we, our, and us”)
This Privacy Policy applies to our United States Operations
We value your trust. We are committed to the responsible:
a) management;
b) use; and
c) protection;
of Personal Information.
This notice describes how we collect, disclose, and protect
Personal Information.
We collect Personal Information to:
a) service your Transactions with us; and
b) support our business functions.
We may obtain Personal Information from:
a) You;
b) your Transactions with us; and
c) third parties such as a consumer-reporting agency.
Based on the type of product or service You apply for or
get from us, Personal Information such as:
a) your name;
b) your address;
c) your income;
d) your payment; or
e) your credit history;
may be gathered from sources such as applications,
Transactions, and consumer reports.
To serve You and service our business, we may share
certain Personal Information. We will share Personal
Information, only as allowed by law, with affiliates such as:
a) our insurance companies;
b) our employee agents;
c) our brokerage firms; and
d) our administrators.
As allowed by law, we may share Personal Financial
Information with our affiliates to:
a) market our products; or
b) market our services;
to You without providing You with an option to prevent
these disclosures.
We may also share Personal Information, only as allowed
by law, with unaffiliated third parties including:
a) independent agents;
b) brokerage firms;
c) insurance companies;
d) administrators; and
e) service providers;
who help us serve You and service our business.
When allowed by law, we may share certain Personal
Financial Information with other unaffiliated third parties
who assist us by performing services or functions such as:
a) taking surveys;
b) marketing our products or services; or
c) offering financial products or services under a joint
agreement between us and one or more financial
institutions.
We will not sell or share your Personal Financial
Information with anyone for purposes unrelated to our
business functions without offering You the opportunity to:
a) “opt-out;” or
b) “opt-in;”
as required by law.
We only disclose Personal Health Information with:
a) your proper written authorization; or
b) as otherwise allowed or required by law.
Our employees have access to Personal Information in
the course of doing their jobs, such as:
a) underwriting policies;
b) paying claims;
c) developing new products; or
d) advising customers of our products and services.
We use manual and electronic security procedures to
maintain:
a) the confidentiality; and
b) the integrity of;
Personal Information that we have. We use these
procedures to guard against unauthorized access.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 24 of 25
Item # 5
HPP Revised September 2012
Some techniques we use to protect Personal Information
include:
a) secured files;
b) user authentication;
c) encryption;
d) firewall technology; and
e) the use of detection software.
We are responsible for and must:
a) identify information to be protected;
b) provide an adequate level of protection for that data;
c) grant access to protected data only to those people
who must use it in the performance of their job-related
duties.
Employees who violate our Privacy Policy will be subject to
discipline, which may include ending their employment with
us.
At the start of our business relationship, we will give You a
copy of our current Privacy Policy.
We will also give You a copy of our current Privacy Policy
once a year if You maintain a continuing business
relationship with us.
We will continue to follow our Privacy Policy regarding
Personal Information even when a business relationship
no longer exists between us.
As used in this Privacy Notice:
Application means your request for our product or service.
Personal Financial Information means financial
information such as:
a) credit history;
b) income;
c) financial benefits; or
d) policy or claim information.
Personal Health Information means health information
such as:
a) your medical records; or
b) information about your illness, disability or injury.
Personal Information means information that identifies
You personally and is not otherwise available to the public.
It includes:
a) Personal Financial Information; and
b) Personal Health Information.
Transaction means your business dealings with us, such
as:
a) your Application;
b) your request for us to pay a claim; and
c) your request for us to take an action on your account.
You means an individual who has given us Personal
Information in conjunction with:
a) asking about;
b) applying for; or
c) obtaining;
a financial product or service from us if the product or
service is used mainly for personal, family, or household
purposes.
This Privacy Policy is being provided on behalf of the following affiliates of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.:
American Maturity Life Insurance Company; First State Insurance Company; Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company; Hartford Administrative
Services Company; Hartford Casualty Insurance Company; Hartford Equity Sales Company, Inc.; Hartford Fire Insurance Company; Hartford Fire
General Agency, Inc.; Hartford HLS Series Fund II, Inc.; Hartford Insurance Company of Illinois; Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest;
Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast; Hartford International Life Reassurance Corporation; Hartford Investment Advisory Company, LLC;
Hartford Investment Financial Services, LLC; Hartford Investment Management Company; Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company;
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company; Hartford Life Insurance Company; Hartford Lloyd’s Insurance Company; Hartford Mezzanine
Investors I, LLC; Hartford Retirement Services, LLC ; Hartford Securities Distribution Company, Inc.; Hartford Series Fund, Inc; Hartford Specialty
Insurance Services of Texas, LLC; Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company; Hartford-Comprehensive Employee Benefit Service Company; HL
Investment Advisors, LLC; M-CAP Insurance Agency, LLC; New England Insurance Company; New England Reinsurance Corporation; Nutmeg
Insurance Agency, Inc.; Nutmeg Insurance Company; Pacific Insurance Company, Limited; Hartford Life Distributors, LLC; Property and Casualty
Insurance Company of Hartford; Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.; The Hartford Alternative Strategies Fund ; The Hartford Mutual Funds II, Inc.;
The Hartford Mutual Funds, Inc.; Trumbull Insurance Company.; Twin City Fire Insurance Company.
Questions about this Privacy Policy may be directed to the following address: The Hartford, GB Compliance Department, 200 Hopmeadow St.,
Simsbury, CT 06089
Attachment number 1 \nPage 25 of 25
Item # 5
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the execution of Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement (JPA) Number 1 between the City of Clearwater and the State
of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT); approve transferring $6,215.16 from Airpark Retained Earnings to cover the City
20% match for Airpark improvements, and adopt Resolution 13-07.
SUMMARY:
On April 2, 2009, the City Council approved a contract with FDOT to provide $166,799.00 in funding at 100% to install new security
fencing, cameras, digital recorders, card readers, and signage at the Clearwater Airpark.
There is $24,860.66 left in the agreement and FDOT has agreed to allow the funds to be used for remaining Airpark improvements, if
the City provides $6,215.16 as a 20% match. This will bring the agreement total up to $173,014.16.
FDOT will provide $24,860.66 (80%) reimbursable funding and the City will pay $6,215.16 (20%) of project costs from Airpark
retained earnings.
Upon execution of the JPA, a mid-year amendment will transfer $6,215.16 of Airpark Fund reserves to capital project 315-94858,
Airpark Security Improvements to fund the City’s share.
Type:Capital expenditure
Current Year Budget?:Yes Budget Adjustment:Yes
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Mid-year amendment to transfer $6,215.16 of Airpark Fund reserves to capital project 315-94858, Airpark Security Improvements.
Current Year Cost:$6,215.16 Annual Operating Cost:
Not to Exceed:$6,215.16 Total Cost:$6,215.16
For Fiscal Year:2012 to 2013
Appropriation Code Amount Appropriation Comment
315-94858 $6,215.16
Review Approval:1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Assistant City Manager ED 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 6
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 6
Item # 6
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 6
Item # 6
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 6
Item # 6
Attachment number 1 \nPage 4 of 6
Item # 6
Attachment number 1 \nPage 5 of 6
Item # 6
Attachment number 1 \nPage 6 of 6
Item # 6
Resolution No. 13-07
RESOLUTION NO. 13-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF
SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
(JPA) NUMBER 1 BETWEEN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER
AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, AMENDING CONTRACT APF54 TO
USE REMAINING $24,860.66 FUNDS AS FDOT’S 80%
CONTRIBUTION, AND INCREASE THE CITY’S 20%
CONTRIBUTION AN ADDITIONAL $6,215.16 FOR
IMPROVEMENTS AT THE CLEARWATER AIRPARK NOT
ORIGINALLY CONTEMPLATED IN CONTRACT APF54;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on April 2, 2009, the City of Clearwater (City) authorized the
execution of a Joint Participation Agreement (JPA) APF54 between the City and
Florida’s Department of Transportation (FDOT) for a project to install new security
fencing, cameras, digital recorders, card readers, and signage at the Clearwater
Airpark; and
WHEREAS, the (FDOT) has agreed to amend JPA APF54, a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” via Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement Number
1 to use the remaining $24,860.66 funds in the agreement for Airpark improvements not
originally in JPA APF54 as part of FDOT’s 80% contribution to Clearwater Airpark
improvements and increase the City’s 20% contribution to the project an additional
$6,215.16; and
WHEREAS, adoption of Resolution 13-07 would authorize the appropriate
officials to execute Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement Number 1, which is
attached hereto as Exhibit “B;” now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Council hereby accepts and approves the Supplemental Joint
Participation Agreement Number 1 between the City and the State of Florida
Department of Transportation, Financial Project No.: 415770-1-94-01, Contract No.:
APF54 at the Clearwater Airpark.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this resolution in the public records of
Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption.
Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
Attachment number 2 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # 6
Resolution No. 13-07 [A04-01371 /122271/1] 2
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _______ day of _____________, 2013.
____________________________
George N. Cretekos
Mayor
Approved as to form: Attest:
__________________________ _____________________________
Camilo A. Soto Rosemarie Call
Assistant City Attorney City Clerk
Attachment number 2 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # 6
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Accept a Modification of Deed granted by U.S. Home Corporation, former owners of real property currently owned by the City for use
as the Countryside Recreation Center. (consent)
SUMMARY:
The subject property was donated to the City by U.S Home Corporation in 1978. The deed used to convey the property has restrictions
requiring the property to be maintained and used only for the purpose of a public park and recreation area.
In addition to these allowable uses, the Modification of Deed will allow the property to be used for the construction and use of a public
library.
Acceptance of this Modification of Deed by U.S. Home Corporation does not require the City to construct a public library but allows for
the construction and operation of a public library.
Staff recommends acceptance of the Modification of Deed.
Review Approval:1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Assistant City Manager 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 7
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # 7
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # 7
Attachment number 2 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # 7
Attachment number 2 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # 7
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Award a contract (purchase order) to Landscape Structures Inc. of Delano, MN for the construction and installation of a one of a kind
Sand Castle Playground and Welcome sign at Pier 60 Park for $438,881 and approve the transfer of $100,000 from unappropriated
retained earnings to CIP 315-93624 Pier 60 Park Repair and Improvement at mid-year, to construct a military flag plaza to be located in
Pier 60 Park. (consent)
SUMMARY:
In Fiscal Year 2010/11, the City Council approved a new Capital Improvement Project for $510,000 to fund repairs and improvements
to Pier 60 Park.
The scope of the project included the repair of existing seating wall, site furniture, ground renovation, walkways, irrigation repairs,
special event layout improvements in order to make the park consistent with the major improvement made in the Beach Walk project as
well as the addition of a new concept in play structures that will become a focal spot on the beach.
The purchase of the sandcastle playground and entry sign will become that focal point for all persons visiting Clearwater Beach and
become a prime photo opportunity for all visitors to the beach and Pier 60 Park. In time staff believes it will be a prime quality tourist
attraction and a destination place for visitors and residents.
The playground is unique in that the main structures are constructed from concrete and is designed to withstand the harsh beach weather
with little to no maintenance. It is colorful and full of unique play areas that allow children to explore the wonders of a life-size sand
castle, including a main central tower and a portion of the sand castle being washed away with the tide.
Staff is recommending the purchase from Landscape Structures Inc. as a sole source item as all playground manufactures design and
make equipment that while similar is unique to their product line and not competitive. The City has traditionally purchased equipment
from various vendors in order to take advantage of special pricing and quality designs.
If approved, it will take approximately 4 months for construction and delivery with installation scheduled for September of this year.
Additional funding is being requested in this project to construct a military flag plaza in Pier 60 Park at the end of State Road 60 and the
roundabout to honor all of the branches of the military. While the plaza has not been fully designed, it will incorporate the same type
of coquina style material used for the doughboy statues at the beginning of the Memorial Causeway Bridge. If approved, funds will be
transferred at mid-year from unappropriated retained earnings.
Type:Capital expenditure
Current Year Budget?:Yes Budget Adjustment:Yes
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Requesting $100,000 for Military Flag Plaza at Pier 60 Park.
Current Year Cost:$538,881 Annual Operating Cost:-0-
Not to Exceed:$538,881 Total Cost:$538,881
For Fiscal Year:2012 to 2013
Appropriation Code Amount Appropriation Comment
315-93624 $438,881 Cost of Playground
Cover Memo
Item # 8
315-93624 $100,000 Flag Plaza
Bid Required?:No Bid Number:
Other Bid / Contract:Bid Exceptions:Sole
Source
Review
Approval:
1) Financial Services 2) Office of Management and Budget 3) Legal 4) Clerk 5) Assistant City Manager 6) Parks and
Recreation 7) Financial Services 8) Office of Management and Budget 9) Legal 10) Clerk 11) Assistant City Manager 12) City
Manager 13) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 8
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 4
Item # 8
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 4
Item # 8
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 4
Item # 8
Attachment number 1 \nPage 4 of 4
Item # 8
Attachment number 2 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # 8
Attachment number 3 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # 8
&
It
e
m
#
8
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve co-sponsorship and waiver of requested City fees and service charges for Fiscal Year 2013/14 special events, including five
annual City events and twelve City co-sponsored events, at an estimated General Fund cost of $381,860 ($24,300 cash contributions and
$357,560 in-kind contributions) and Enterprise Fund cost and fee waiver of $86,010, for the purposes of Fiscal Year 2013/14
departmental budget submittals. (consent)
SUMMARY:
According to City Council Policy 4M, Special Event Fees, there shall be an annual review of City sponsored/co-sponsored events
during the budget process. An agenda item approving co-sponsorship and level of support for these events will be brought before the
City Council at the beginning of the budget process each fiscal year.
In the event additional money is requested beyond what is included in the approved budget, City Council approval will be needed.
Staff recommended level of cash and in-kind contributions to be included in the various departmental budgets for Fiscal Year 2013/14
for City sponsored and co-sponsored special events, which includes 34 additional special events requiring some type of in-kind support
from the Parks and Recreation Special Events Division during Fiscal Year 2013/14.
It should be noted, that this represents an increase of $18,520 in General Fund support from Fiscal Year 2012/13 and a total decrease in
Enterprise fund support of $17,780. The increase in General Fund is due primarily to:
· Overall 3% increase in salaries
· Fire service increasing staffing levels to meet National Best Practice Standards
· Police support of Tri Rock increase based upon operating the event for one year
The decrease in enterprise funds is for adjustments made for the Tri Rock event with reductions in lost parking revenue and a reduction
of sanitation costs for Tri Rock event. The overall Tri Rock level of support remains the same.
Cash Requests of $24,300 is the same as Fiscal Year 2012: Clearwater Veterans Alliance ($5,000), Clearwater Jazz Holiday ($14,550),
and the Martin Luther King, Jr. Day March and Rally ($4,750).
For Council's consideration, the following four events are requesting City support and co-sponsorship for Fiscal Year 2013/14.
Council direction is requested for which events to be included in the departmental submittals.
1. Light It Up Clearwater - The Clearwater Beach Chamber has requested $10,000 in cash support for fireworks to support
events on Clearwater Beach. (Increase $10,000 cash, 500 in attendance)
2. Christmas Boat Parade - This event has been held in Clearwater for many years and continues to grow. In order to
accommodate more people viewing the event from Coachman Park, staff is requesting $825 in additional in kind support for
portalets, security, police and marketing. (Increase $825 operating budgets, 3,000 in attendance)
3. Clearwater Beach Restaurant Week – The Clearwater Beach Chamber of Commerce is requesting $2550 in total in kind
services including police security, parking services, dumpsters, barricades and barricade trailer, in-kind marketing support and
tent inspection. Funds raised to benefit local non-profits like Clearwater Marine Aquarium. (Increase $2,550 operating budgets,
3,000 in attendance)
4. Run/Walk for Willa - This event is a fundraising event for the Willa Carson Health and Wellness Center. Last year's event had
less than 50 participants. In-kind service of $3,100 representing police security, sound tech and equipment, chairs, tables,
staging and in-kind marketing support is being requested ($3,100 operating budgets, 350 anticipated attendance).
Cover Memo
Item # 9
Type:Operating Expenditure
Current Year Budget?:No Budget Adjustment:No
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Current Year Cost:$467,870 Annual Operating Cost:-0-
Not to Exceed:$467,870 Total Cost:$467,870
For Fiscal Year:2013 to 2014
Appropriation Code Amount Appropriation Comment
Various $381,860 Various General Fund Costs
Various $86,010 Various Enterprise Fund Costs
Bid Required?:No Bid Number:
Other Bid / Contract:Bid Exceptions:None
Review Approval:1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Assistant City Manager 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 9
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # 9
Attachment number 2 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # 9
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Award a Contract (Purchase Order) for $253,497.00 to RingPower of Riverview, FL for one Caterpillar M322 Hydraulic Excavator,
Wheeled Type, in accordance with Sec. 2.564(1)(d), Code of Ordinances - Other Governmental bid; authorize lease purchase under the
City's Master Lease Purchase Agreement and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
SUMMARY:
The Excavator will be purchased through the Florida Sheriff's Association Contract 12-10-0905, Specification 20 and
quote dated March 18, 2013.
The Excavator will replace G2615 (2002 Gradall Excavator with 2286 hours and 1306 hours). The Excavator is
included in the Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Garage CIP Replacement Fund. The Excavator is assigned to Stormwater in
Engineering.
Type:Purchase
Current Year Budget?:Yes Budget Adjustment:None
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Current Year Cost:$52,727.38 Annual Operating Cost:$5,857.59
Not to Exceed:Total Cost:$58,806.38
For Fiscal Year:2013 to 2014
Appropriation Code Amount Appropriation Comment
0316-94241-564100-519-
0000
$253,497.00L/P CIP
Bid Required?:Yes Bid Number:
Other Bid / Contract:
Florida
Sheriff's
Association
Contract #12-
10-0905
Bid Exceptions:None
Review
Approval:
1) Financial Services 2) Office of Management and Budget 3) Legal 4) Clerk 5) Assistant City Manager 6) City
Manager 7) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 10
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Award a Contract (Purchase Order) for $303,520.10 to Rush Truck Center of Tampa, FL for one Peterbilt Model 320 chassis with E-Z
Pack CFL 35 Cubic Yard Body, in accordance with Sec. 2.564(1)(d), Code of Ordinances - Other governmental bid; authorize lease
purchase under the City's Master Lease Purchase Agreement and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
SUMMARY:
The Front Loader will be purchased through the Florida Sheriff's Association Contract 12-10-0905, Specification 12
and quote dated February 15, 2013.
This truck will replace G2773 (2002 Peterbilt front loader with 68,339 miles). The front loader is included in the
Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Garage Replacement Fund. The front loader is assigned to Solid Waste.
The front loader will be CNG powered and the cost to upgrade is $34,545.00. The payback term is 6.9 years.
Type:Purchase
Current Year Budget?:Yes Budget Adjustment:None
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Current Year Cost:$63,132.18 Annual Operating Cost:$28,998.99
Not to Exceed:Total Cost:$92,131.17
For Fiscal Year:2013 to 2014
Appropriation Code Amount Appropriation Comment
0316-94241-564100-519-
0000
$303,520.10L/P CIP
Bid Required?:Yes Bid Number:
Other Bid / Contract:
Florida
Sheriff's
Association
Contract #12-
10-0905
Bid Exceptions:None
Review
Approval:
1) Financial Services 2) Office of Management and Budget 3) Legal 4) Clerk 5) Assistant City Manager 6) City
Manager 7) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 11
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Change Order 2 to Layne Inliner, LLC in the amount of $420,000.00 for sanitary sewer line cleaning and inspection at various locations
throughout the City of Clearwater for a new contract total of $1,620,000.00; and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
SUMMARY:
The City has initiated a comprehensive maintenance program to clean, inspect, rehabilitate and repair existing sanitary sewer
pipelines and manholes throughout the City of Clearwater. A key element of the maintenance program is preventative cleaning and
inspecting with closed circuit television to identify deficiencies in the underground infrastructure. This type of work is performed by
a combination of both City and contract crews in order to meet program goals. The program objective is to maintain the integrity of
the sanitary sewer system and minimize disruptions in service to our citizens.
April 15, 2010, the Clearwater City Council awarded a contract to Reynolds Inliner, LLC for the Sanitary Sewer and Televising
Inspection per Bid 09-0047-UT in the amount of $800,000 with two one-year extensions, when agreed by both parties.
August 16, 2012, City Council approved Change Order 1 to Reynolds Inliner, LLC, who has changed their name to Layne Inliner,
LLC, in the amount of $400,000 to provide continued services to the City with the same terms and conditions of the contract.
The goal of this agenda item is to extend the contract one more year and add $420,000 to the current contract for the same pricing,
terms and conditions.
The City Utilities staff will coordinate with in-house crew progress and direct the contractor, on an ongoing basis, to those areas as
prescribed in the preventative maintenance schedule to meet program goals.
Sufficient revenue is available in Utility Renewal and Replacement project 0327-96665, Sanitary Sewer R and R to fund this change
order.
Type:Capital expenditure
Current Year Budget?:Yes Budget Adjustment:No
Budget Adjustment Comments:
See Summary
Current Year Cost:$420,000 Annual Operating Cost:
Not to Exceed:$420,000 Total Cost:$420,000
For Fiscal Year:2012 to 2013
Appropriation Code Amount Appropriation Comment
0327-96665-563800-535-000-
0000
$420,000 See Summary
Bid Required?:No Bid Number:09-0047-
UT
Other Bid / Contract:Bid Exceptions:None
Review
Approval:
1) Engineering 2) Financial Services 3) Office of Management and Budget 4) Legal 5) Clerk 6) Assistant City Manager 7) City
Manager 8) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 12
CHANGE ORDER 2 DATE: 3/20/2013
CONTRACTOR:
Layne Liner, LLC
14413 62nd Street North
Clearwater, FL
SCOPE OF CHANGE: THIS CHANGE ORDER ACCEPTS REVISIONS TO THE CONTRACT
STATEMENT OF CONTRACT AMOUNT ACCEPTED BY:
Layne Inliner, LLC
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $800,000.00
CO 1 - City Council - 8/16/2012 $400,000.00
$420,000.00 By: (SEAL)
NEW CONTRACT AMOUNT 1,620,000.00$ Mark Harris, Vice President
APPROVED AS TO FORM: Date:
Witnesses:
Camilo Soto, Assistant City Attorney
George N Cretekos, Mayor
ATTEST:
Recommended By:
Rosemarie Call, City Clerk City of Clearwater
Date:
CITY OF CLEARWATER, in Lan-Anh Nguyen, PE, Project Manager
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
William B. Horne, II City Manager Michael D Quillen, PE, City Engineer
PROJECT: 2009-2010 Sanitary Sewer and Manhole Rehabilitation - Sanitary
Sewer Cleaning and Televising Inspection
0327-96665-563800-535-000-0000 B
PROJECT NUMBER: 09-0047-UT
This change order is to extend the contract for another year and increase the funding with all unit prices, terms and conditions
remaining the same-see attached for details. as they have changed names.
PO REFERENCE NO.: ST106417
DATE OF CONTRACT: May 18, 2010
CODE: 0376-96665-563800-535-000-0000 A
COUNCIL AWARD: April 15, 2010
CO 2 - City Council - 4/16/2013
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # 12
RE: Change Order 2 - 2009-10 Sanitary Sewer and Manhole Rehabilitation Sanitary Sewer Cleaning and Televising Inspection
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT COST TOTAL COST
Code B: 0327-96665-563800-535-000-0000
Increases:
1. Sewer Line Cleaning
a. Mobilization LS 20 $0.01 $0.20
b. Heavy Cleaning (per lf)
8"-10" Diameter LF 50,000 $0.01 $500.00
12"-15" Diameter LF 3,000 $0.01 $30.00
16"-24" Diameter LF 4,000 $0.01 $40.00
30"-36" Diameter LF 2,000 $10.00 $20,000.00
c. Root Removal
8"-10" Diameter LF 1,000 $0.01 $10.00
12"-15" Diameter LF 1,000 $0.01 $10.00
16"-24" Diameter LF 1,000 $0.01 $10.00
30"-36" Diameter LF 560 $0.01 $5.60
d. Easement Access Additional
8"-10" Diameter LF #######$0.01 $2,000.00
12"-15" Diameter LF 15,000 $0.01 $150.00
16"-24" Diameter LF 15,000 $0.01 $150.00
30"-36" Diameter LF 1,500 $0.01 $15.00
e. Turberculation Cleantion
8"-10" Diameter LF 5,000 $0.01 $50.00
12"-15" Diameter LF 5,000 $0.01 $50.00
16"-24" Diameter LF 5,000 $0.01 $50.00
30"-36" Diameter LF 5,000 $0.01 $50.00
$0.00
f. Manhole Clean/Jet-Vac EA 400 $10.00 $4,000.00
2. CCTV Pipe Inspection with PACP/CUES Granite XP compatibility
a. Mobilization include Traffic Control LS 20 $0.01 $0.20
b. CCTV pipe inspection
8"-10" Diameter LF #######$1.40 $140,000.00
12"-15" Diameter LF 30,000 $2.00 $60,000.00
16"-24" Diameter LF 45,000 $3.50 $157,500.00
30"-36" Diameter LF 4,100 $6.50 $26,650.00
c. Manhole Inspection EA 500 $10.00 $5,000.00
d. Smoke Testing LF 3,529 $1.00 $3,529.00
e. Additional Set-Up LS 200 $1.00 $200.00
Total Increases:$420,000.00
Page 2 of 2 continued:
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # 12
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Parking Consultant of Record contracts with Kimley-Horn and Associates; TimHaahs; and Walker Parking Consultants for a
period of three years, commencing April 22, 2013, and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
SUMMARY:
On February 4, 2013, Requests for Qualifications (RFQ 13-13) were solicited from parking consulting firms to serve as
Parking Consultants of Record for the City for a three-year period.
Three firms responded. All three of these firms have previously served as parking consultants for the City and have
performed quality work; consequently, staff is recommending entering into contracts with all three firms. Entering into
contracts with these firms will enable the City to continue to utilize well-qualified firms to complete a large variety of
parking related tasks over the next three years.
Bid Required?:No Bid Number:
Other Bid / Contract:Bid Exceptions:None
Review Approval:1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Assistant City Manager 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 4 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 5 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 6 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 7 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 8 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 9 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 10 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 11 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 12 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 13 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 14 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 15 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 16 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 17 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 18 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 19 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 20 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 21 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 22 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 23 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 24 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 25 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 26 of 27
Item # 13
Attachment number 1 \nPage 27 of 27
Item # 13
AGREEMENT
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This AGREEMENT is made and entered into on the ______ day of _________________, 2013
by and between the City of Clearwater, Florida (CITY) and
_________________________________, (CONSULTANT).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS the CITY desires to engage the CONSULTANT to perform certain professional
services pertinent to such work in accordance with this Agreement; and
WHEREAS the CONSULTANT desires to provide such professional services in accordance
with this Agreement; and
WHEREAS the CITY selected the CONSULTANT in accordance with the competitive selection
process described in Section 287.055 of the Florida Statutes, and based on information and
representations given by the CONSULTANT in a proposal dated March 15, 2013:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits which will accrue
to the parties hereto in carrying out the terms of this Agreement, it is mutually understood and
agreed as follows:
1.0 GENERAL SCOPE OF THIS AGREEMENT
The relationship of the CONSULTANT to the CITY will be that of a professional
consultant, and the CONSULTANT will provide the professional and technical services
required under this Agreement in accordance with acceptable engineering practices and
ethical standards.
2.0 PROFESSIONAL TECHNICAL SERVICES
Attachment number 2 \nPage 1 of 15
Item # 13
2.1 It shall be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to work with and for the
CITY to perform an array of services for the City as it relates to creating additional
parking garages and related parking facilities/operations. Representative assignment
areas are expected to include, but not be limited to, planning, studies or design services as
listed below:
1. Supply/Demand Study
2. Financial Feasibility Study
3. Parking Garage Operational Review (including access and revenue control equipment)
4. Parking Garage Functional Review
5. Parking Garage Site Analysis
6. Design and Construction Management
2.2 The CONSULTANT’S services under this Agreement will be provided under Work
Orders, Generally, each Work Order will include the services for a single project or
assignment, and it will contain a mutually agreed-upon detailed scope of work, fee, and
schedule of performance in accordance with applicable fiscal and budgetary constraints.
Total compensation for all services shall not exceed $100,000 per Work Order unless
specifically authorized by the City Council.
2.3 The CONSULTANT shall maintain an adequate and competent staff of professionally
qualified personnel available to the CITY for the purpose of rendering the required
engineering and/or architect services hereunder, and shall diligently execute the work
to meet the completion time established in Work Order.
2.4 The CITY reserves the right to enter into contracts with other consulting firms for similar
services. The CONSULTANT will, when directed to do so by the CITY, coordinate and
work with other consulting firms retained by the CITY.
3.0 PERIOD OF SERVICE
3.1 The CONSULTANT shall begin work promptly after receipt of a fully executed copy of
each Work Order, in accordance with Paragraph 2.2, above. Receipt of a fully executed
Work Order shall constitute written notice to proceed.
3.2 If the CONSULTANT’S services called for under any Work Order are delayed for
reasons beyond the CONSULTANT’S control, the time of performance shall be adjusted
as appropriate.
3.3 It is the intent of the parties hereto that this Agreement continue in force until three (3)
years from the date of initiation, April 18, 2013, subject to the provisions for termination
Attachment number 2 \nPage 2 of 15
Item # 13
contained herein. Assignments that are in progress at the Contract termination date
will be completed by the CONSULTANT unless specifically terminated by the CITY.
4.0 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
See Exhibit “B” attached.
5.0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/CONSULTANT’S COMPETITIVE
NEGOTIATION ACT (CCNA) - Florida Statue 287.055
Professional Services provided under this Agreement are within the scope of the practice
of architecture, landscape architecture, professional engineering, or registered land
surveying, as defined by the laws of the State of Florida. Provisions of F.S. 287.055
apply.
6.0 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
6.1 All documents including field books, drawings, specifications, calculations, geotechnical
investigation reports, etc., used in the preparation of the work shall be supplied by the
CONSULTANT and shall become the property of the CITY. The CITY acknowledges
that such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for use by the CITY or
others for purposes other than those for which the documents are prepared. Any reuse of
these documents without written verification or adaptation by the CONSULTANT for the
specific purpose intended will be at the CITY’s sole risk without liability or legal
exposure to the CONSULTANT.
6.2 The CONSULTANT shall prepare preliminary construction cost estimates with each
design submittal to verify the proposed design is within the City project budgets. The
CONSULTANT shall prepare a final estimate of probable construction costs, following
CITY approval of the bid documents and other prebid activities. The CITY hereby
acknowledges that estimates of probable construction costs cannot be guaranteed, and
such estimates are not to be construed as a promise that designed facilities will not
exceed a cost limitation. Should the lowest, responsive and acceptable bid price received
by the CITY within three (3) months from the date of the CITY’s approval of the bid
documents exceed the CONSULTANT’S final cost estimate by more than ten percent
(10%), the CONSULTANT shall perform a detailed evaluation of the low bid. The
evaluation will review the bid prices on a line item basis, identifying areas of
disagreement and providing a rationale for the difference.
6.3 The CONSULTANT will provide expert witnesses, if required, to testify in connection
with any suit at law. A supplemental agreement will be negotiated between the CITY
and the CONSULTANT describing the services desired and providing a basis for
compensation to the CONSULTANT.
Attachment number 2 \nPage 3 of 15
Item # 13
6.4 Upon the CONSULTANT’S written request, the CITY will furnish or cause to be
furnished such reports, studies, instruments, documents, and other information as the
CONSULTANT and CITY mutually deem necessary.
6.5 The CITY and the CONSULTANT each bind themselves and their successors, legal
representatives and assigns to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners,
successors, legal representatives and assigns of each other party, in respect to all
covenants of this Agreement; and, neither the CITY nor the CONSULTANT will assign
or transfer its interest in this Agreement without written consent of the other.
6.6 The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold harmless the CITY, and its officers and
employees, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to,
reasonable attorneys’ fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or
intentionally wrongful conduct of the CONSULTANT and other persons employed or
utilized by the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement and any Work
Orders issued under this Agreement.
6.7 The CONSULTANT agrees not to engage the services of any person or persons in the
employ of the CITY to an allied capacity, on either a full or part-time basis, on the date of
the signing of this Agreement, or during its term.
6.8 Key personnel assigned to CITY projects by the CONSULTANT shall not be removed
from the projects until alternate personnel acceptable to the CITY are approved in writing
by the CITY. Key personnel are identified as: Project Manager and technical experts.
6.9 The CONSULTANT shall attach a brief status report on the project(s) with each request
for payment.
6.10 Unless otherwise required by law or judicial order, the Engineer and or Architect agrees
that it shall make no statements, press releases or other public communication
concerning the Agreement or its subject matter or otherwise disclose or permit to be
disclosed any of the data, technical processes, business affairs or other information
obtained or furnished in the conduct of work under this Agreement without first
notifying the City and securing its consent in writing. The Engineer and or Architect also
agrees that it shall not publish, copyright or patent any of the site specific data or reports
furnished for or resulting from work under this Agreement. This does not include
materials previously or concurrently developed by the Engineer and or Architect for “In
House” use. Only data and reports generated by the Engineer and or Architect under this
Agreement shall be the property of the City.
6.11 Pursuant to Florida Statute 287-132-133, effective July 1, 1989, the City of Clearwater,
as a public entity, may not accept any proposal from, award any contract to, or transact
any business in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, F.S., for
Category Two (currently $35,000) with any person or affiliate on the convicted vendor
list for a period of 36 months from the date that person or affiliate was placed on the
convicted vendor list unless that person of affiliate has been removed from the list
Attachment number 2 \nPage 4 of 15
Item # 13
pursuant to Section 287.133 (3)(f), F.S.
7.0 COMPENSATION
7.1 The CONSULTANT shall be compensated for all services rendered under this
Agreement in accordance with the provisions of each Work Order, upon presentation of
CONSULTANT’S invoice. An hourly rate schedule and typical methods of
compensation are attached hereto as Exhibit “C”.
7.2 Except as may be addressed in the initiating Work Order, the compensation for services
shall be invoiced by the CONSULTANT and paid by the CITY once each month. Such
invoices shall be due and payable upon receipt.
7.3 The CONSULTANT agrees to allow full and open inspection of payroll records and
expenditures in connection with hourly rate and cost plus fixed fee work assignments
upon request of the CITY.
8.0 PROHIBITION AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
The CONSULTANT warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or
person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT to solicit
or secure this Agreement and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any persons, company,
corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working for the
CONSULTANT any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or any other consideration,
contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement.
9.0 TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by either party with seven (7) days prior written
notice, in the event of substantial failure to perform in accordance with the terms hereof
by the other party through no fault of the terminating party. If this Agreement is
terminated, the CONSULTANT shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of
outstanding Work Orders for all work performed up to the date of termination.
10.0 SUSPENSION, CANCELLATION OR ABANDONMENT
If the project described in any Work Order is suspended, canceled, or abandoned by the
CITY, without affecting any other Work Order or this Agreement, the CONSULTANT
shall be given five (5) days prior written notice of such action and shall be compensated
for professional services provided up to the date of suspension, cancellation or
abandonment.
Attachment number 2 \nPage 5 of 15
Item # 13
This Agreement shall be administered and interpreted under the laws of the State of
Florida.
11.0 TERMINATION OF CONVENIENCE
Either the CITY or the CONSULTANT may terminate the Agreement at any time by
giving written notice to the other of such termination and specifying the effective date of
such termination at least thirty (30) days before said termination date. If the Agreement
is terminated by the CITY as provided herein, the CONSULTANT will be paid for
services rendered through the date of termination.
Attachment number 2 \nPage 6 of 15
Item # 13
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement on the
date and year first above written.
______________________________
By: ______________________________
WITNESS:
By: ______________________________
Countersigned: CITY OF CLEARWATER
___________________________ By: ______________________________
George N. Cretekos William B. Horne, II
Mayor-Commissioner City Manager
Approved as to form and ATTEST:
correctness:
___________________________ By: ______________________________
Camilo Soto Rosemarie Call
Assistant City Attorney City Clerk
Attachment number 2 \nPage 7 of 15
Item # 13
EXHIBIT “B”
RISK MANAGEMENT / INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
FOR
AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE: The City of Clearwater enters into agreements and contracts
for services and/or products with other parties.
Agreements and contracts shall contain Risk Management/Insurance terms to protect the City’s
interest and to minimize its potential liabilities. Whenever applicable, the following terms shall
be included in agreements and contracts.
CITY DEFINED: The term “City” (whenever it may appear in this Exhibit) is defined to mean
the City of Clearwater itself, its Council, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Clearwater, a Florida governmental agency created pursuant to Part III, Chapter 163, Florida
Statute, its duly appointed officers, or other public bodies, officers, employees, volunteers,
representatives and agents.
OTHER PARTY DEFINED: The term “Other Party” (whenever it may appear in this Exhibit)
is defined to mean the other person or entity which is a party to an agreement or contract with the
City, any subsidiaries or affiliates, officers, employees, volunteers, representatives, agents,
contractors, and subcontractors.
HOLD HARMLESS DEFINED: The term “Hold Harmless” (whenever it may appear in this
Exhibit) is defined to mean the City shall be held harmless against all claims for bodily injury,
personal injury, sickness, disease, death or damage to property or loss of use resulting there
from, or arising out of, the agreement or contract unless such claims are a result of the City’s sole
negligence.
PAYMENT ON BEHALF OF CITY DEFINED: The term “Payment on Behalf of City”
(whenever it may appear in this Exhibit) is defined to mean the Other Party agrees to pay on
behalf of the City, and to pay the cost of the City’s legal defense, as may be selected by the City,
for claims or suits arising from the fault of the Other Party or other persons employed or utilized
by the Other Party in performance of the contract. Such payment on behalf of the City shall be
in addition to any and all other legal remedies available to the City and shall not be considered to
be the City’s exclusive remedy.
INSURANCE: The Other Party shall, at its own cost and expense, acquire and maintain (and
cause contractors and subcontractors, if utilized, to acquire and maintain) during the term with
the City, sufficient insurance to adequately protect the respective interest of the parties.
Specifically the Other Party must carry the following minimum types and amounts of insurance
Attachment number 2 \nPage 8 of 15
Item # 13
on an occurrence basis or in the case of coverage that cannot be obtained on an occurrence basis,
then coverage can be obtained on a claims-made basis with a minimum three (3) year tail
following the termination or expiration of the Agreement. These insurance requirements shall
not limit the liability of the Other Party. The City does not represent that these types or amounts
of insurance to be sufficient or adequate to protect the Other Party’s interests or liabilities, but
are merely minimums:
1. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY: $1,000,000 per occurrence, including
but not limited to, bodily injury, personal injury, property damage, premises-
operations, products/completed operations, contractual liability, independent
contractors, and liability assumed under an insured contract. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the
general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general
aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
2. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY: $1,000,000 per accident combined single limit, for
bodily injury and property damage for any owned, non-owned, hired, or borrowed
automobile.
3. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION: Other Party will obtain and maintain during the
life of this contract, Workers’ Compensation insurance in accordance with the laws of
the State of Florida, for all of Other Party’s employees employed at the site of the
project. Coverage should include Voluntary Compensation and U.S. Longshoremen’s
and Harbor Worker’s Act coverage where applicable.
4. EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY: $100,000 each employee, each accident, and
$100,000 each employee/$500,000 policy limit for disease, and which meets all state
and federal laws. Coverage must be applicable to employees, contractors, and
subcontractors, if any.
5. WATERCRAFT/AIRCRAFT LIABILITY: If the Other Party’s provision of
services involves utilization of watercraft or aircraft, watercraft and/or aircraft
liability coverage must be provided to include bodily injury and property damage
arising out of ownership, maintenance or use of any watercraft or aircraft, including
owned, non-owned and hired.
6. PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS COVERAGE: The Other Party is
required to continue to purchase products contract or agreement, for minimum of
three (3) years beyond the City’s acceptance of renovation or construction projects.
ACCEPTABILITY OF INSURERS: Insurance must be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.
Attachment number 2 \nPage 9 of 15
Item # 13
DEDUCTIBLES AND SELF-INSURED RETENTIONS: Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Other Party
to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and
defense expenses within the retention.
ADDITIONAL INSURED: The City is to be specifically included as an additional insured on
all liability coverage described above except for the Workers’ Compensation and Professional
Liability coverage’s.
OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS: The General Liability and Automobile Liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1. PRIMARY INSURANCE COVERAGE: For any claims related to this Agreement,
the Other Party’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City,
its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess
of the Other Party’s insurance and shall not contribute to it.
2. RIGHT OF RECOVERY: Except for Workers’ Compensation, the Other Party
waives its right of recovery against the City, to the extent permitted by its insurance
policies.
3. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST/CROSS LIABILITY PROVISION: The Other
Party shall request that its insurers’ policies include or be endorsed to include a
Severability of Interest/Cross Liability provision so the City will be treated as if a
separate policy were in existence without increasing the policy limits.
4. HOLD HARMLESS/INDEMNIFICATION: The Other Party shall indemnify, and
hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, from liabilities, damages, losses,
and costs, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys’ fees, to the extent caused
by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Other Party
and other persons employed or utilized by the Other Party in the performance of this
Agreement and any Work Orders issued under this Agreement. Other Party
acknowledges that it is solely responsible for complying with the terms of the
Agreement or a purchase order or contract arising out of the Agreement (Revised
7/9/12).
5. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OR RESTRICTION: Each insurance policy
required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled
by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice sent via certified
mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. It is the Other Party’s
responsibility to ensure the notice requirement is met.
Attachment number 2 \nPage 10 of 15
Item # 13
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE/CERTIFIED COPIES OF POLICIES: The Other Party,
if selected, will provide the City with a Certificate or Certificates of Insurance showing the
existence of coverage as required by the Agreement. In addition, the Other Party will provide to
the City, if asked in writing, certified copies of all policies of insurance. The Other Party will
maintain the required coverage with a current Certificate or Certificates of Insurance throughout
the term of the Agreement with the City. New certificates and new certified copies of policies
shall be provided to the City whenever any policy is renewed, revised, or obtained from other
insurers.
The address where such certificates and certified policies shall be sent or delivered is as follows:
City of Clearwater
Attention: City Clerk
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
CONSIDERATION FOR HOLD HARMLESS/PAYMENT ON BEHALF: The Other Party
agrees to accept, and acknowledges as an adequate amount of remuneration, the consideration of
$100.00 for agreeing to the Hold Harmless, Payment on Behalf of the City, Insurance and
Certificates of Insurance provisions in the Agreement.
SUBCONTRACTORS: Other Party shall require and verify all subcontractors, if used,
maintain insurance, including Workers’ Compensation insurance, subject to all of the
requirements stated herein prior to beginning work.
LOSS CONTROL/SAFETY: Precaution shall be exercised at all times by the Other Party for
the protection of all persons, including employees, and property. The Other Party shall be
expected to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, or ordinances related to safety and
health, and shall make special efforts where appropriate to detect hazardous conditions, and shall
take prompt action where loss control/safety measures should reasonably be expected.
The City may order work to be stopped if conditions exist that present immediate danger to
persons or property. The Other Party acknowledges that such stoppage will not shift
responsibility for any damages from the Other Party to the City.
ADDITIONAL INSURANCE FOR REPAIR OR SERVICE OR OTHER CONTRACTS:
If checked below, the City requires the following additional provisions or types of insurance for
repair or service or other contracts to afford added protection against loss which could affect the
work being performed:
_____ INSTALLATION FLOATER INSURANCE: Installation Floater insurance is to be
provided to cover damage or destruction to equipment being installed or otherwise being
handled or stored by the Other Party. The amount of coverage should be adequate to
provide full replacement value of the equipment being installed, otherwise being handled
or stored on or off premises. All risks coverage is preferred.
_____ MOTOR TRUCK CARGO INSURANCE: If the Installation Floater insurance does
not provide transportation coverage, separate Motor Truck Cargo or Transportation
Attachment number 2 \nPage 11 of 15
Item # 13
insurance is to be provided for materials or equipment transported in the Other Party’s
vehicles from place of receipt to building sites or other storage sites. All risks covered
are preferred.
_____ CONTRACTOR’S EQUIPMENT INSURANCE: Contractor’s Equipment insurance
is to be purchased to cover loss of equipment and machinery utilized in the performance
of work by the Other Party. All risks coverage is preferred.
_____ FIDELITY/DISHONESTY INSURANCE-COVERAGE FOR EMPLOYER:
Fidelity/dishonesty insurance is to be purchased to cover dishonest acts of the Other
Party’s employees, including but not limited to theft of vehicles, materials, supplies,
equipment, tools, etc.; especially property necessary to work performed.
_____ FIDELITY/DISHONESTY INSURANCE-COVERAGE FOR CITY:
Fidelity/Dishonesty/Liability insurance is to be purchased or extended to cover dishonest
acts of the Other Party’s employees resulting in loss to the City.
ADDITIONAL INSURANCE FOR RENOVATION OR CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTS: If checked below, the City requires the following types of insurance for
renovation or construction contracts. This is in addition to the required coverage’s previously
cited and the Additional Insurance for Repair or Service or Other Contracts.
_____ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PROJECT AGGREGATE: Because the
Commercial General Liability form of coverage includes an annual aggregate limitation
on the amount of insurance provided, a separate project aggregate limit is required by the
City for this contract or agreement.
_____ OWNERS PROTECTIVE LIABILITY: For renovation or construction contracts the
Other Party shall provide for the City an Owners Protective Liability insurance policy
(preferably through the Other Party’s insurer) in the name of the City.
_____ BUILDER’S RISK: Builder’s Risk Insurance is to be purchased to cover all risks of
loss in the complete and full value of the project with no coinsurance penalty provisions.
This insurance shall insure the interests of the City, the Other Party, and all
subcontractors in the work and shall insure against special form causes of loss (all risk
perils), including collapse during construction, for replacement cost (including fees and
charges of engineers, architects, attorneys and other professionals). The Other Party shall
obtain and maintain similar property insurance on equipment, materials, supplies and
other property and portions of the work stored on or off site or in transit. Builder’s Risk
Insurance shall be endorsed to permit occupancy until such time as the facilities are
completed and accepted by the City and written notice of the fact has been issued by the
City.
PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY, MALPRACTICE AND/OR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS:
If checked below the City requires the following terms and types of insurance for professional,
malpractice, and errors or omissions liability.
Attachment number 2 \nPage 12 of 15
Item # 13
__X__ HOLD HARMLESS: The following replaces the previous Hold Harmless wording:
The Other Party shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, and it’s officers, employees,
from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable
attorneys’ fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally
wrongful conduct of the Other Party and other persons employed or utilized by the Other
Party in the performance of this Agreement and any Work Orders issued under this
Agreement. The intent of this includes all claims for financial loss with respect to the
provision of, or failure to, provide professional or other services resulting in professional
malpractice, or errors, or omissions liability arising out of the negligent performance of
this agreement or contract, unless such claims are a result of the City’s own negligence.
(Revised 7/9/12).
__X__ PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY/MALPRACTICE/ERRORS OR OMISSIONS
INSURANCE: The Other Party shall purchase and maintain professional liability or
malpractice or errors or omissions insurance appropriate for the type of business engaged
in by the Other Party with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence.
If a claims made form of coverage is provided, the retroactive date of coverage shall be
no later than the inception date of claims made coverage, unless prior policy was
extended indefinitely to cover prior acts.
Coverage shall be extended beyond the policy year either by a supplemental extended
reporting period (ERP) of as great a duration as available, and with no less coverage and
with reinstated aggregate limits, or by requiring that nay new policy provide a retroactive
date no later than the inception date of claims made coverage.
WRITTEN AGREEMENT/CONTRACT: Any party providing services or products to the
City will be expected to enter into a written agreement, contract or purchase order with the City
that incorporates, either in writing or by reference, all of the pertinent provisions relating to
insurance and insurance requirements as contained herein. A failure to do so may, at the sole
discretion of the City, disqualify any Party from performing services or selling products to the
City provided, however, the City reserves the right to waive any such requirements.
Attachment number 2 \nPage 13 of 15
Item # 13
EXHIBIT “C”
PROVISION OF PAYMENT
BASIS FOR PAYMENT
The owner shall pay CONSULTANT and CONSULTANT agrees to accept as full compensation
for its services (as established by Work Order) compensation as computed by one of the
following methods:
Method “A” – Costs Times Multiplier Basis –
Compensation in the form of actual costs times a multiplier as determined by the following
formula:
Actual raw Salary Cost (Hourly Rate) x Multiplier + Subconsultant Cost + Other Direct Costs.
Multiplier ________ includes fringe benefit rate, overhead, operating margin and profit and is
subject to annual review.
Subconsultant Costs are actual costs incurred times a factor of 1.00. Actual costs shall be based on
billing rates for required labor classifications.
Other Direct Costs are actual costs incurred for travel outside of Tampa Bay area, printing, copying,
long distance telephone calls, etc., times a factor of 1.00.
Method “B” – Lump Sum –
Compensation in the form of “lump sum” for all work associated with a Work Order or task and
shall be determined by mutual agreement between the CONSULTANT and the City. The lump sum
amount shall be negotiated based upon the Work Order scope of services and approved by both the
City and the CONSULTANT.
Hourly Rates -
The estimated hourly rates below represent 2013 costs and categories. Periodic changes are
anticipated and modification can be made annually upon City and CONSULTANT review.
(Note: All rates are hourly salary)
CITY OF CLEARWATER CONSULTANT OF RECORD
Attachment number 2 \nPage 14 of 15
Item # 13
RFQ 13-13 2013 DIRECT HOURLY RATES
Job Classification
Minimum
Rate
($ / hour)
Typical
Maximum
Senior Vice President
Vice President/Officer-in-Charge
Senior Project Manager/Group Manager
Project Manager/Associate Principal
Construction Manager
Construction Engineer
Senior Engineer/Scientist
Engineer/Scientist (III-IV)
Engineer/Scientist (I-III)
Planner
Landscape Architect
Field Technician
Senior Designer
Drafter/CADD Operator
Operations Specialist
Fiscal/Accounting
Administrative/Clerical
MULTIPLIER: .
Attachment number 2 \nPage 15 of 15
Item # 13
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Award a contract to Steve’s Excavating and Paving Inc. of Clearwater, Florida, for Tropic Hills Stormwater Outfall Project Phase III
(11-0040-EN), in the amount of $1,449,371.28, which is the lowest responsible bid received in accordance with the plans and
specifications and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
SUMMARY:
The Tropic Hills neighborhood experienced severe flooding in June 1997 and February 2006. The existing outfall is undersized and
during heavy rainfall, water backs up in the neighborhood, flooding streets and houses. Tropic Hills Drainage Improvements Project
consists of 3 phases. Phase I is complete and FDOT is working on Phase II with the US 19 Project.
This project is the last Phase, which consists of the following tasks:
Replacing approximately 900 LF of undersized pipe with a new 10 ft. by 4 ft. box culvert; Installing a 10 ft. -diameter stormwater
treatment structure; Installing 130 LF of 30 in. PVC drainage pipe within the Tropic Hills neighborhood; and Replacing 325 LF of
existing old 8 in. VCP sanitary pipe with the new PVC pipe.
Construction of this Phase will improve water quality by minimizing sediment transport into the bay.
The completion of this last Phase will provide significant improvements to the stormwater conveyance system for the Tropic Hills
neighborhood and reduce potential flooding.
The Project is anticipated to be completed within 180 calendar days.
The Project will be cooperatively funded by the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) at 50% of the design and
construction cost or up to $1,250,000, and 50% by the Stormwater Utility Fund.
Sufficient funding is available in the amounts of $1,394,090.78 from 0315-96179, Tropic Hills Phase III, $42,339 from 0327-96634,
Sanitary Utility Relocation and $12,941.50 from 0327-96742, Line Relocation - Capital, for total funding in the amount of
$1,449,371.28.
Type:Capital expenditure
Current Year Budget?:Yes Budget Adjustment:No
Budget Adjustment Comments:
See summary
Current Year Cost:$1,449,371.28 Annual Operating Cost:
Not to Exceed:$1,449,371.28 Total Cost:$1,449,371.28
For Fiscal Year:2012 to 2013
Appropriation Code Amount Appropriation Comment
0315-96179-563700-539-
000-0000
$1,394,090.78See summary
0327-96634-563800-535-
000-0000
$ 42,339.00 See summary
Cover Memo
Item # 14
0327-96742-563800-533-
000-0000
$ 12,941.50 See summary
Bid Required?:Yes Bid Number:11-0040-EN
Other Bid / Contract:Bid Exceptions:None
Review
Approval:
1) Engineering 2) Financial Services 3) Office of Management and Budget 4) Legal 5) Clerk 6) Assistant City
Manager 7) City Manager 8) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 14
BI
D
I
T
E
M
S
U
N
I
T
Q
T
Y
U
N
I
T
P
R
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
P
R
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
PR
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
P
R
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
P
R
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
P
RICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNT
1.
0
1.
1
Mo
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
,
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
,
D
e
m
o
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
LS
1
9
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
8
,
9
4
0
.
0
0
$
9
8
,
9
4
0
.
0
0
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 177,750.00$ 177,750.00$ 56,075.00$ 56,075.00$ 90,000.00$ 90,000.00$
1.
2
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
L
S
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 5,400.00$ 5,400.00$ 5,760.00$ 5,760.00$
1.
3
E
r
o
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
S
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
L
S
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
8
5
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
8
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 3,875.00$ 3,875.00$ 6,750.00$ 6,750.00$
SU
B
-
T
O
T
A
L
11
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
3
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
1
1
,
2
9
0
.
0
0
$
6
0
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 192,250.00$ 3,875.00$ 65,350.00$ 102,510.00$
2.
0
2.
1
B
y
p
a
s
s
i
n
g
o
f
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
l
o
w
s
L
S
1
2
5
0
0
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 8,950.00$ 8,950.00$ 19,075.00$ 19,075.00$
2.
2
D
e
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
LS
1
1
4
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
4
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
6
8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
6
8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 79,450.00$ 79,450.00$ 24,750.00$ 24,750.00$
2.
3
Un
s
u
i
t
a
b
l
e
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
&
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(P
i
p
e
/
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
&
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
B
e
d
d
i
n
g
O
n
l
y
)
CY
6
1
5
2
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
5
.
0
0
$
4
6
,
1
2
5
.
0
0
$
3
5
.
0
0
$
2
1
,
5
2
5
.
0
0
$
5
7
.
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
5
5
.
0
0
$ 0.01$ 6.15$ 40.50$ 24,907.50$ 53.00$ 32,595.00$
SU
B
-
T
O
T
A
L
15
9
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
6
,
1
2
5
.
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
2
5
.
0
0
$
7
1
,
0
5
5
.
0
0
$ 35,006.15$ 113,307.50$ 76,420.00$
3.
0
TR
O
P
I
C
H
I
L
L
S
P
H
A
S
E
I
I
I
1
1
-
0
0
4
0
-
E
N
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
STEVE'S EXCAVATINGRAM EXCAVATINGROWLANDS, INC.
MO
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
A
N
D
S
I
T
E
P
R
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
EA
R
T
H
W
O
R
K
ST
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
QR
C
,
I
N
C
MT
M
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
S
GI
B
B
S
&
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
K
A
M
M
I
N
G
A
&
R
O
O
D
V
O
E
T
S
3.
0
3.
1
10
'
x
4
'
B
o
x
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
LF
8
7
0
9
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
8
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
0
2
5
.
0
0
$
8
9
1
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
0
7
5
.
0
0
$
9
3
5
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$
9
6
3
.
0
0
$
8
3
7
,
8
1
0
.
0
0
$ 1,209.00$ 1,051,830.00$ 940.00$ 817,800.00$ 811.00$ 705,570.00$
3.
2
30
"
R
C
P
(
C
l
a
s
s
I
I
I
)
LF
3
0
1
6
5
.
0
0
$
4
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
7
5
.
0
0
$
2
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
5
.
0
0
$
3
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
5
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 137.00$ 4,110.00$ 236.00$ 7,080.00$ 132.00$ 3,960.00$
3.
3
24
"
R
C
P
(
C
l
a
s
s
I
I
I
)
LF
5
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
5
.
0
0
$
4
7
5
.
0
0
$
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 150.00$ 750.00$ 255.00$ 1,275.00$ 240.00$ 1,200.00$
3.
4
12
"
R
C
P
(
C
l
a
s
s
I
I
I
)
LF
2
0
1
3
5
.
0
0
$
2
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
5
.
0
0
$
1
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
5
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$ 100.00$ 2,000.00$ 113.00$ 2,260.00$ 125.00$ 2,500.00$
3.
5
Di
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
(
w
/
W
e
i
r
&
F
D
O
T
Ty
p
e
"
F
"
I
n
l
e
t
)
EA
1
2
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
5
,
5
7
5
.
0
0
$
1
5
,
5
7
5
.
0
0
$
1
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 4,600.00$ 4,600.00$ 18,250.00$ 18,250.00$ 18,240.00$ 18,240.00$
3.
6
28
'
x
5
'
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
EA
1
3
6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
4
,
6
8
5
.
0
0
$
3
4
,
6
8
5
.
0
0
$
2
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 98,000.00$ 98,000.00$ 55,350.00$ 55,350.00$ 38,880.00$ 38,880.00$
3.
7
Gr
a
t
e
d
R
i
s
e
r
o
n
B
o
x
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
EA
3
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
3
8
2
.
0
0
$
1
0
,
1
4
6
.
0
0
$
2
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$ 2,300.00$ 6,900.00$ 2,870.00$ 8,610.00$ 2,130.00$ 6,390.00$
3.
8
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
T
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
EA
1
7
7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
0
,
9
5
4
.
0
0
$
9
0
,
9
5
4
.
0
0
$
6
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 67,850.00$ 67,850.00$ 64,195.00$ 64,195.00$
3.
9
Ty
p
e
"
C
"
I
n
l
e
t
(
B
r
e
n
t
w
o
o
d
D
r
i
v
e
O
u
t
f
a
l
l
)
EA
1
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
0
4
6
.
0
0
$
3
,
0
4
6
.
0
0
$
3
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$ 5,750.00$ 5,750.00$ 4,925.00$ 4,925.00$ 4,575.00$ 4,575.00$
3.
1
He
a
d
w
a
l
l
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
LS
1
1
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
5
,
7
7
5
.
0
0
$
1
5
,
7
7
5
.
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 28,750.00$ 28,750.00$ 17,575.00$ 17,575.00$ 10,280.00$ 10,280.00$
3.
1
1
Ch
a
n
n
e
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
(
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
,
R
i
p
r
a
p
B
l
a
n
k
e
t
&
T
u
r
f
R
e
i
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
M
a
t
)
LS
1
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 9,125.00$ 9,125.00$ 4,210.00$ 4,210.00$
3.
1
2
Ma
s
o
n
r
y
P
i
p
e
P
l
u
g
(
B
o
x
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
)
EA
1
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,525.00$ 2,525.00$ 2,170.00$ 2,170.00$
3.
1
3
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
D
o
w
n
s
t
r
e
a
m
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
EA
1
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
3
8
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
3
8
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,925.00$ 4,925.00$ 1,350.00$ 1,350.00$
3.
1
4
30
"
C
o
n
t
e
c
h
A
2
0
0
0
(
B
r
e
n
t
w
o
o
d
D
r
i
v
e
O
u
t
f
a
l
l
)
LF
1
2
0
7
5
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
1
0
.
0
0
$
2
5
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
3
.
0
0
$
8
,
7
6
0
.
0
0
$ 170.00$ 20,400.00$ 79.00$ 9,480.00$ 110.00$ 13,200.00$
Ou
t
f
a
l
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
(
M
i
t
e
r
e
d
E
n
d
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
Ri
p
r
a
p
B
l
a
n
k
e
t
&
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
)
(
B
r
e
n
t
w
o
o
d
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
3.
1
5
Ri
p
r
a
p
B
l
a
n
k
e
t
&
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
)
(
B
r
e
n
t
w
o
o
d
Dr
i
v
e
O
u
t
f
a
l
l
)
LS
1
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 7,400.00$ 7,400.00$ 3,550.00$ 3,550.00$
SU
B
-
T
O
T
A
L
98
2
,
6
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
2
1
3
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
1
5
6
,
5
3
6
.
0
0
$
9
9
0
,
6
7
0
.
0
0
$ 1,311,590.00$ 1,034,430.00$ 880,270.00$
4.
0
PA
V
I
N
G
A
N
D
M
A
R
K
I
N
G
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 3
Item # 14
BI
D
I
T
E
M
S
U
N
I
T
Q
T
Y
U
N
I
T
P
R
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
P
R
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
PR
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
P
R
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
P
R
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
P
RICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNT
TR
O
P
I
C
H
I
L
L
S
P
H
A
S
E
I
I
I
1
1
-
0
0
4
0
-
E
N
STEVE'S EXCAVATINGRAM EXCAVATINGROWLANDS, INC.
QR
C
,
I
N
C
MT
M
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
S
GI
B
B
S
&
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
K
A
M
M
I
N
G
A
&
R
O
O
D
V
O
E
T
S
4.
1
As
p
h
a
l
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
SY
5
,
8
3
0
2
2
.
0
0
$
1
2
8
,
2
6
0
.
0
0
$
4
2
.
0
0
$
2
4
4
,
8
6
0
.
0
0
$
2
3
.
0
0
$
1
3
4
,
0
9
0
.
0
0
$
2
6
.
0
0
$
1
5
1
,
5
8
0
.
0
0
$ 8.50$ 49,555.00$ 54.25$ 316,277.50$ 29.30$ 170,819.00$
4.
2
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
M
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
/
S
t
r
i
p
i
n
g
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
LS
1
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$ 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 2,400.00$ 2,400.00$ 1,540.00$ 1,540.00$
4.
3
St
r
a
i
g
h
t
C
u
r
b
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
LF
1
8
0
1
7
.
0
0
$
3
,
0
6
0
.
0
0
$
3
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
5
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
8
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
4
0
.
0
0
$ 30.00$ 5,400.00$ 13.75$ 2,475.00$ 25.00$ 4,500.00$
4.
4
Va
l
l
e
y
G
u
t
t
e
r
C
u
r
b
(
B
r
e
n
t
w
o
o
d
D
r
i
v
e
O
u
t
f
a
l
l
)
LF
2
0
2
5
.
0
0
$
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
4
.
0
0
$
6
8
0
.
0
0
$
2
5
.
0
0
$
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 30.00$ 600.00$ 40.00$ 800.00$ 27.00$ 540.00$
4.
5
Co
n
c
r
e
t
e
D
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
SF
2
5
0
8
.
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
.
5
0
$
1
,
8
7
5
.
0
0
$
8
.
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
.
0
0
$
1
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$ 7.00$ 1,750.00$ 5.90$ 1,475.00$ 6.80$ 1,700.00$
4.
6
Re
m
o
v
e
&
R
e
s
e
t
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
LS
1
1
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
5
5
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
5
5
0
.
0
0
$
3
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 17,250.00$ 17,250.00$ 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 4,585.00$ 4,585.00$
4.
7
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
S
l
a
b
(
M
a
t
c
h
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Th
i
c
k
n
e
s
s
)
CY
3
0
1
7
5
.
0
0
$
5
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$
3
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
9
5
.
0
0
$
8
,
8
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
5
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 200.00$ 6,000.00$ 755.00$ 22,650.00$ 160.00$ 4,800.00$
4.
8
Re
s
e
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
B
o
l
l
a
r
d
s
/
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
N
e
w
B
o
l
l
a
r
d
s
LS
1
7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 8,600.00$ 8,600.00$ 3,120.00$ 3,120.00$
SU
B
-
T
O
T
A
L
15
9
,
5
7
0
.
0
0
$
2
7
6
,
8
1
5
.
0
0
$
1
6
6
,
5
9
0
.
0
0
$
2
1
0
,
1
7
0
.
0
0
$ 87,555.00$ 384,677.50$ 191,604.00$
5.
0
Tr
e
e
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
(
i
f
n
e
e
d
e
d
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
&
S
O
D
D
I
N
G
5.
1
Tr
e
e
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
(
i
f
n
e
e
d
e
d
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
)
EA
3
40
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 1,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 1,200.00$ 3,600.00$ 1,450.00$ 4,350.00$
5.
2
Tr
e
e
R
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
EA
2
30
0
.
0
0
$
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
5
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 1,200.00$ 2,400.00$ 1,800.00$ 3,600.00$ 300.00$ 600.00$
5.
3
T
r
e
e
B
a
r
r
i
c
a
d
e
(
w
/
C
u
s
h
i
o
n
i
n
g
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
L
F
2
2
5
6.
0
0
$
1
,
3
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
.
0
0
$
4
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
.
0
0
$
2
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$ 12.00$ 2,700.00$ 24.30$ 5,467.50$ 19.25$ 4,331.25$
5.
4
R
o
o
t
P
r
u
n
i
n
g
LF
1
0
0
11
.
0
0
$
1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
5
.
0
0
$
5
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 12.00$ 1,200.00$ 12.00$ 1,200.00$ 15.30$ 1,530.00$
5.
5
Re
s
e
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
F
e
n
c
i
n
g
&
M
a
i
l
b
o
x
e
s
(
B
r
e
n
t
w
o
o
d
Dr
i
v
e
O
u
t
f
a
l
l
)
LS
1
2,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
7
5
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
7
5
.
0
0
$
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 3,085.00$ 3,085.00$ 1,750.00$ 1,750.00$
5.
6
S
o
d
d
i
n
g
SF
5,
7
0
0
0.
7
0
$
3
,
9
9
0
.
0
0
$
0
.
7
5
$
4
,
2
7
5
.
0
0
$
0
.
7
5
$
4
,
2
7
5
.
0
0
$
0
.
5
0
$
2
,
8
5
0
.
0
0
$ 0.50$ 2,850.00$ 0.66$ 3,762.00$ 0.70$ 3,990.00$
SU
B
-
T
O
T
A
L
1
0
,
7
4
0
.
0
0
$
1
2
,
9
7
5
.
0
0
$
2
2
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
9
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$ 14,150.00$ 20,714.50$ 16,551.25$
1,
4
2
6
,
2
6
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
7
4
2
,
5
1
5
.
0
0
$
1
,
6
5
6
,
8
4
1
.
0
0
$
1
,
3
5
1
,
9
9
5
.
0
0
$ 1,640,551.15$ 1,618,479.50$ 1,267,355.25$
6.
0
14
2
,
6
2
6
.
0
0
$
1
7
4
,
2
5
1
.
5
0
$
1
6
5
,
6
8
4
.
1
0
$
1
3
5
,
1
9
9
.
5
0
$ 164,055.12$ 161,847.95$ 126,735.53$
1,
5
6
8
,
8
8
6
.
0
0
$
1
,
9
1
6
,
7
6
6
.
5
0
$
1
,
8
2
2
,
5
2
5
.
1
0
$
1
,
4
8
7
,
1
9
4
.
5
0
$ 1,804,606.27$ 1,780,327.45$ 1,394,090.78$
7.
0
7.
1
By
p
a
s
s
i
n
g
o
f
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
F
l
o
w
s
LS
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
7
7
5
.
0
0
$
1
,
7
7
5
.
0
0
$
6
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
6
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$ 4,500.00$ 4,500.00$ 8,475.00$ 8,475.00$ 5,980.00$ 5,980.00$
7.
2
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
P
r
e
c
a
s
t
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
M
a
n
h
o
l
e
(4
'
-
D
i
a
m
e
t
e
r
)
EA
1
8
0
0
0
8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 6,900.00$ 6,900.00$ 5,070.00$ 5,070.00$ 7,880.00$ 7,880.00$
Co
n
n
e
c
t
t
o
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
M
a
n
h
o
l
e
/
M
o
d
i
f
y
SE
W
E
R
SU
B
-
T
O
T
A
L
S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
(
1
.
1
-
5
.
6
)
10
%
O
W
N
E
R
'
S
C
O
N
T
I
N
G
E
N
C
Y
(
S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
)
UT
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
TO
T
A
L
S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
(
1
.
1
-
6
.
0
)
7.
3
Co
n
n
e
c
t
t
o
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
M
a
n
h
o
l
e
/
M
o
d
i
f
y
Be
n
c
h
EA
2
1
5
0
0
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
7
5
.
0
0
$
3
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 700.00$ 1,400.00$ 900.00$ 1,800.00$
8"
P
V
C
(
S
D
R
-
3
5
)
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
S
e
w
e
r
LF
3
2
5
9
0
2
9
,
2
5
0
.
0
0
$
5
7
.
0
0
$
1
8
,
5
2
5
.
0
0
$
3
5
.
0
0
$
1
1
,
3
7
5
.
0
0
$
4
0
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$ 63.00$ 20,475.00$ 77.15$ 25,073.75$ 60.00$ 19,500.00$
7.
5
Sa
n
i
t
a
r
y
L
a
t
e
r
a
l
R
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(4
"
&
6
"
)
LF
9
0
8
0
7
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
5
.
0
0
$
3
,
1
5
0
.
0
0
$
2
6
.
0
0
$
2
,
3
4
0
.
0
0
$ 50.00$ 4,500.00$ 50.70$ 4,563.00$ 37.00$ 3,330.00$ Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 3
Item # 14
BI
D
I
T
E
M
S
U
N
I
T
Q
T
Y
U
N
I
T
P
R
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
P
R
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
PR
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
P
R
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
P
R
I
C
E
A
M
O
U
N
T
U
N
I
T
P
RICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNT
TR
O
P
I
C
H
I
L
L
S
P
H
A
S
E
I
I
I
1
1
-
0
0
4
0
-
E
N
STEVE'S EXCAVATINGRAM EXCAVATINGROWLANDS, INC.
QR
C
,
I
N
C
MT
M
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
S
GI
B
B
S
&
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
K
A
M
M
I
N
G
A
&
R
O
O
D
V
O
E
T
S
57
,
4
5
0
.
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
2
5
.
0
0
$
2
4
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
3
,
1
4
0
.
0
0
$ 38,375.00$ 44,581.75$ 38,490.00$
7.
6
5,
7
4
5
.
0
0
$
3
,
5
0
2
.
5
0
$
2
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
3
1
4
.
0
0
$ 3,837.50$ 4,458.18$ 3,849.00$
63
,
1
9
5
.
0
0
$
3
8
,
5
2
7
.
5
0
$
2
6
,
8
4
0
.
0
0
$
3
6
,
4
5
4
.
0
0
$ 42,212.50$ 49,039.93$ 42,339.00$
7.
7
6"
D
.
I
.
P
.
P
o
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
M
a
i
n
Re
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
s
t
r
a
i
n
A
s
-
N
e
e
d
e
d
)
LF
1
1
0
8
5
.
0
0
$
9
,
3
5
0
.
0
0
$
9
4
.
0
0
$
1
0
,
3
4
0
.
0
0
$
4
5
.
0
0
$
4
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
3
8
.
0
0
$
4
,
1
8
0
.
0
0
$ 115.00$ 12,650.00$ 47.50$ 5,225.00$ 49.00$ 5,390.00$
7.
8
Re
s
t
r
a
i
n
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
o
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
M
a
i
n
J
o
i
n
t
s
EA
3
1
0
0
0
3
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
5
0
1
,
0
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
5
0
.
0
0
$
4
5
0
.
0
0
$ 5001,500.00$ 590.00$ 1,770.00$ 140.00$ 420.00$
7.
9
Du
c
t
i
l
e
I
r
o
n
F
i
t
t
i
n
g
s
TO
N
0
.
2
1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
8
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
6
2
0
.
0
0
$
5
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
$
1
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
2
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$ 100002,000.00$ 19,150.00$ 3,830.00$ 11,550.00$ 2,310.00$
7.
1
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
F
i
r
e
H
y
d
r
a
n
t
EA
1
4
5
0
0
4
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$
3
9
5
0
3
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
$
3
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
3
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$ 26152,615.00$ 3,735.00$ 3,735.00$ 2,620.00$ 2,620.00$
7.
1
1
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
6
"
G
a
t
e
V
a
l
v
e
EA
1
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
7
9
0
7
9
0
.
0
0
$
7
7
5
7
7
5
.
0
0
$
9
0
0
.
0
0
$
9
0
0
.
0
0
$ 16501,650.00$ 13251,325.00$ 1,025.00$ 1,025.00$
19
,
8
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
7
,
0
5
0
.
0
0
$
1
1
,
8
2
5
.
0
0
$
1
2
,
1
3
0
.
0
0
$ 20,415.00$ 15,885.00$ 11,765.00$
7.
1
2
10
%
O
W
N
E
R
S
C
O
N
T
I
N
G
E
N
C
Y
(
W
A
T
E
R
)
L
S
1
1,
9
8
5
.
0
0
$
1
,
7
0
5
.
0
0
$
1
,
1
8
2
.
5
0
$
1
,
2
1
3
.
0
0
$ 2,041.50$ 1,588.50$ 1,176.50$
21
,
8
3
5
.
0
0
$
1
8
,
7
5
5
.
0
0
$
1
3
,
0
0
7
.
5
0
$
1
3
,
3
4
3
.
0
0
$ 22,456.50$ 17,473.50$ 12,941.50$
85
,
0
3
0
.
0
0
$
57
,
2
8
2
.
5
0
$
39
,
8
4
7
.
5
0
$
49,797.00$ 64,669.00$ 66,513.43$ 55,280.50$
10
%
O
W
N
E
R
'
S
C
O
N
T
I
N
G
E
N
C
Y
(
S
E
W
E
R
)
TO
T
A
L
S
E
W
E
R
(
7
.
1
-
7
.
6
)
WA
T
E
R
SU
B
-
T
O
T
A
L
S
E
W
E
R
(
7
.
1
-
7
.
5
)
SU
B
-
T
O
T
A
L
W
A
T
E
R
(
7
.
7
-
7
.
1
1
)
TO
T
A
L
W
A
T
E
R
(
7
.
7
-
7
.
1
2
)
TO
T
A
L
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
(
7
.
1
-
7
.
1
2
)
85
,
0
3
0
.
0
0
$
57
,
2
8
2
.
5
0
$
39
,
8
4
7
.
5
0
$
49,797.00$ 64,669.00$ 66,513.43$ 55,280.50$
1,
6
5
3
,
9
1
6
.
0
0
$
1
,
9
7
4
,
0
4
9
.
0
0
$
1
,
8
6
2
,
3
7
2
.
6
0
$
1
,
5
3
6
,
9
9
1
.
5
0
$ 1,869,275.27$ 1,846,840.88$ 1,449,371.28$
TO
T
A
L
B
I
D
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
(
1
.
1
-
7
.
1
2
)
TO
T
A
L
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
(
7
.
1
-
7
.
1
2
)
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 3
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 1 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 2 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 3 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 4 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 5 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 6 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 7 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 8 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 9 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 10 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 11 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 12 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 13 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 14 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 15 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 16 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 17 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 18 of 19
Item # 14
Attachment number 2 \nPage 19 of 19
Item # 14
CHINABERRY
Old T a m p a B a y
AVE
AVE
AVE
AVE
AVE
AVE
AVE
EDENVILLE
AVE
BURNICE DR
BLVD
DR
BLVD
DR
SUMMERLIN
DR
FAIRBANKS
SUMMERLIN
FAIRBANKS
GLENANN DR
MORELAND
HARN
DICKENSON
MORELAND
BRENTWOOD
DRIVE
DR
FLUSHING HERMITAGE
FRUITLAND
GRENADA
EVERGLADES
CARACAS
DRIFTWOOD
AVE
TROPIC HILLS DR
Pearce Dr
SR-55
BURMA
DR
BYPASS
EVELYN
FERNWOOD AVE
KILMER
RD
ST
EVELYN AVE
EDENVILLE
RD
AVE
SHELLEY ST
SEVILLE
Altira
BLVD
SR-60
HARBO
R
SKY
HAMPTON
OLD COACHMAN RD
Phase IPhase II
Phase III
TROPIC HILLS PHASE III
Prepared by:Engineering DepartmentGeographic Technology Division100 S. Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756Ph: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)526-4755www.MyClearwater.com
PROJECTSITE
MBK PV
N.T.S.310A 20-29s-16e
3/27/2013Drawn By:Reviewed By:
S - T - RGrid #
Date:
Scale:
Tropic HillsPhase III
Path: V:\GIS\Engineering\Location Maps\Tropic Hills PHASE III.mxd
Attachment number 3 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # 14
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a $252,000.00 Blanket Purchase Order, from May 1, 2013 through April 30, 2014, to Water Specialists Technologies LLC, of
Sanford, FL for the purchase of copper precipitant TR-50, and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
SUMMARY:
The City of Clearwater owns and operates three Water Reclamation Facilities (WRF) and must comply with regulatory
requirements as set forth in the operating permits issued through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(FDEP). TR-50 is a copper precipitant that is used to maintain permit compliance for copper removal limitations in effluent
discharged into receiving surface waters. The FDEP permitted effluent limit is 3.7 parts per billion.
TR-50 is a proprietary, sole source product. It was selected for use in 2006 after an extensive engineering study was
undertaken to find the product best capable of allowing the City’s facilities to meet FDEP permit requirements while not
causing any toxicity, creating any chemical interaction side effects, and being the most cost-effective.Sole source purchase
of this chemical meets all requirements of Section 2.564 (1)(b) of the Code of Ordinances.
Water Specialists Technologies (WST) is the sole source and manufacturer of TR-50. They hold patent number 4,943,377
for Thio-Red, a method for removing dissolved heavy metals from waste oils, industrial wastewaters, or any polar
solvent. Thio-Red is the primary ingredient in TR-50, and Water Specialists Technologies is the sole manufacturer of this
product. WST does not currently have any other TR-50 distributors within the state of Florida.
WST has held Clearwater’s discounted price ($0.55/lb.) for TR-50 at or below their distributors’ pricing for many years. The
attached letter reflects pricing, our arrangement for the return of used totes (an offer that is not extended to any of their
other customers), and WST’s continued regard of Clearwater as a preferred customer.
This product has met all expectations and has performed very well. It has not exhibited any toxicity and has not created any
chemical interaction related ill-effects. The plants have met the permit-required FDEP copper limitation ever since the
chemical began being used.
Sufficient budget is available in the Water and Sewer Utility Fund operating cost center 0421-01351-551000-535-000-0000,
WPC Operations, to fund $105,000.00 of the current year cost and is planned in the budget request to be brought forward
for Fiscal Year 13/14 in the amount of $147,000.00.
Type:Operating Expenditure
Current Year Budget?:Yes Budget Adjustment:None
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Current Year Cost:$105,000.00 Annual Operating Cost:
Not to Exceed:Total Cost:$252,000.00
For Fiscal Year:FY12 to FY13
Appropriation Code Amount Appropriation Comment
0421-01351-551000-535-
000-0000
$105,000.00FY12/13
0421-01351-551000-535-$147,000.00FY13/14
Cover Memo
Item # 15
000-0000
Bid Required?:No Bid Number:
Other Bid / Contract:Bid Exceptions:Sole Source
Review
Approval:
1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Purchasing 5) Clerk 6) Assistant City Manager 7) City
Manager 8) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 15
DATE: April 1, 2013
TO: City of Clearwater
ATTN: Dave Porter, WET Manager
SUBJ: TR-50
Water Specialists Technologies is the sole source and manufacturer of TR-50, the City
of Clearwater’s long-standing waste water treatment chemistry. We hold patent number
4,943,377 for Thio-Red, a method for removing dissolved heavy metals from waste oils,
industrial wastewaters, or any polar solvent. Thio-Red is the primary ingredient in TR-
50, and Water Specialists Technologies is the sole manufacturer of this product.
We do not currently have any other TR-50 distributor within the state of Florida. The
shipping costs provided to Water Specialists Technologies by our LTL carriers are in
turn reflected in Clearwater’s lower in-state freight charges.
Your sales representative (and Water Specialists Technologies’ owner), Dean
Schmelter, has held Clearwater’s discounted price for this chemistry at or below our
distributors’ pricing for many years. It reflects both our arrangment for the return of your
used totes (an offer that is not extended to any of our other customers), and our
continued regard of Clearwater as a preferred customer.
Current pricing of TR-50 in 2580 pound 275 gallon totes remains at $0.55/lb.
Please call if you have any questions, or if there is anything else you need to set up a
blanket purchase order with us again this year. We look forward to continuing to serve
you in the future, and appreciate your business.
Pam McKenzie
Business Manager
1515 Kastner Place, Sanford, FL 32771 * 407-321-7910 * fax: 407-321-3098
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # 15
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a Blanket Purchase Order to T. Wayne Hill Trucking, Inc., of Bartow, FL in the amount of $1,636,000.08 for biosolids
services for a one-year period with two optional annual extensions, and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. (consent)
SUMMARY:
The City of Clearwater’s Water Reclamation Facilities (WRF) produces a residual product (biosolids) that requires hauling
and disposal. The City’s current contract for the hauling and disposal of these biosolids expires April 30, 2013.
In response to the Request for Proposal 14-13 (RFP), three responses were received March 18, 2013. T. Wayne Hill
Trucking, Inc. represented the lowest responsive bidder for Base Bid Services at $24.46/wet ton for stabilized biosolids
cake removal and disposal and $0.03/gallon for unstabilized liquid sludge transport.
The contractor is required to provide two basic services: (1) to remove and dispose of stabilized (Class B) dewatered
biosolids; and (2) to transport unstabilized liquid domestic wastewater residuals from the City’s East WRF to the Northeast
WRF for treatment and dewatering. In addition, alternate services as outlined in the RFP, and for which unit prices were
provided in the contractor’s bid, may be provided at the City’s direction should specific emergency conditions develop at
one or more of our facilities.
The contractor accepts full responsibility and liability for the hauling and disposal of residuals from the points of loading
from the source facility, in accordance with Chapter 62-640, F.A.C., and shall be responsible to comply with existing Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
residuals treatment and disposal regulations, all other applicable federal, state and local regulations, and any changes
made to these regulations during the contract period.
Sufficient budget is available in the Water and Sewer Utility Fund operating cost center 0421-01351-530300-535-000-0000,
WPC Operations, to fund $228,591.79 of the remainder of the current year cost of this contract and is planned in the budget
request to be brought forward for Fiscal Year 13/14 in the amount of $545,333.36, for Fiscal Year 14/15 in the amount of
$545,333.36, and for Fiscal Year 15/16 in the amount of $316,741.57.
Type:Operating Expenditure
Current Year Budget?:Yes Budget Adjustment:None
Budget Adjustment Comments:
Current Year Cost:$228,591.79 Annual Operating Cost:$545,333.36
Not to Exceed:Total Cost:$1,636,000.08
For Fiscal Year:2013 to 2016
Appropriation Code Amount Appropriation Comment
421-01351-530300-535-
000-0000
$228,591.79 FY12/13
421-01351-530300-535-
000-0000
$545,333.36 FY13/14
421-01351-530300-535-
000-0000
$545,333.36 FY14/15
Cover Memo
Item # 16
421-01351-530300-535-
000-0000
$316,741.57 FY15/16
Bid Required?:Yes Bid Number:RFP 14-13
Other Bid / Contract:Bid Exceptions:None
Review
Approval:
1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Purchasing 5) Clerk 6) Assistant City Manager 7) City
Manager 8) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 16
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP 14-13
Proposers:
HH H&H LIQUID SLUDGE DISPOSAL, INC.AMS APPLACHIAN MATERIAL SERVICE, INC.
6990 US HIGHWAY 27 P.O. BOX 97
BRANFORD, FL 32008 TERRA CEIA, FL 34250-0097
STEVE HACHT or RICK HACHT JON WIMPY
800.653.0386 941.776.8706
TWH T. WAYNE HILL TRUCKING, INC.
595 W. SUMMERLIN STREET
BARTOW, FL 33830
DOUGLAS W. HILL
863.519.6677
Proposal Prices:TWHHHAMS
Cost Basis
Base Bid - Stabilized Cake To LA $/Wet Ton 24.46$ 36.48$ 39.73$
Base Bid - Unstab. Liq. East to NE $/Gallon 0.0300$ 0.0350$ 0.0439$
Alt - Class B Cake Incorporated $/Wet Ton 54.00$ N/A 47.73$
FOR THE CITY OF CLEARWATER
BIOSOLIDS SERVICES
Alt - Unstab. Cake to RMF $/Wet Ton 54.00$ 47.67$ 61.89$
(Class B stabilized not meeting vector)$/Wet Ton 36.48$
Alt - Unstab. Cake to LF $/Wet Ton 54.00$ 52.10$ 61.89$
Alt - Unstab. Liqd. Marsh. To NE $/Gallon 0.0400$ N/A 0.0439$
Alt - Unstab. Liqd. East to Marsh.$/Gallon 0.0400$ N/A 0.0439$
Weekly 156 Weeks
TWH Base Bid Items Total: 9,532.60$ 1,487,085.60$
HH Base Bid Items Total:13,583.80$ 2,119,072.80$
AMS Base Bid Items Total:15,169.80$ 2,366,488.80$
ADVERTISED: TAMPA BAY TIMES 2/16/2013
myclearwater.com 2/14/2013 - 3/18/2013
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # 16
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the annexation, initial Future Land Use Map designations of Residential Low (RL), Preservation (P) and Drainage Feature
Overlay and initial Zoning Atlas designations of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) and Preservation (P) districts for 1861 and
1880 Diane Drive; 1744 Evans Drive; 1716 and 1733 Grove Drive; 1765 Lucas Drive; 1806 Marilyn Drive; 1848 and 1851 Skyland
Drive; 2720 and 2724 Morningside Drive; and 2724 and 2728 Woodring Drive (all parcels are located in Section 05, Township 29
South, Range 16 East); and pass Ordinances 8392-13, 8393-13 and 8394-13 on first reading. (ATA2013-01001)
SUMMARY:
The City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department identified an area within the Clearwater Planning Area with a large
concentration of properties with Agreements to Annex (ATAs) that are eligible for annexation. These properties are located east of U.S.
Highway 19, north of State Road 590 and south of Sunset Point Road. Subdivisions in this area include Virginia Grove Terrace and
Carlton Terrace. The Department identified a total of 189 properties in this area that could be annexed through a phased approach over
the next several years, and to date 146 properties have been annexed.
This application, which has been identified as Phase E of the overall annexation project, includes 13 of the 189 properties. Current or
previous owners of these properties entered into ATAs between 1983 and 2011 to obtain sanitary sewer service. The Planning and
Development Department is initiating this project to bring the properties into the City’s jurisdiction in compliance with the terms and
conditions set forth in the agreements. The Phase E properties are occupied by 13 detached dwellings on 2.57 acres of land. It is
proposed that approximately 1.64 acres ofright-of-way throughout this area on Woodring Drive, Grove Drive, Lucas Drive, Marilyn
Drive, Skyland Drive, and Terrace Drive right-of-way not currently within the city limits also be annexed (please refer to the attached
annexation map for the specific locations). It is proposed that the 13 properties be assigned a future land use map designation of
Residential Low (RL). A major drainage ditch traverses one of these properties (1744 Evans Drive) for which the Preservation (P) and
Drainage Feature Overlay designations are proposed consistent with the ditch boundaries. It is proposed that all parcels be assigned the
zoning designation of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District. In addition, it is proposed the property with the drainage
ditch also be assigned the Preservation (P) zoning category.
The Planning and Development Department has determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the provisions of
Community Development Code Section 4-604.E as follows:
· The properties currently receive sanitary sewer service from the City and water service from Pinellas County.
Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City. The properties are located within Police District III and
service will be administered through the district headquarters located at 2851 N. McMullen Booth Road. Fire and
emergency medical services will be provided to these properties by Station 48 located at 1700 Belcher Road. The
City has adequate capacity to serve the properties with solid waste, police, fire and EMS service. Water service will
continue to be provided by Pinellas County. The proposed annexations will not have an adverse effect on public
facility levels of service; and
· The proposed annexation is consistent with and promotes the following objectives and policy of the Clearwater
Comprehensive Plan:
Policy A.7.1.3: Invoke agreements to annex where properties located within enclaves meet the contiguity requirements of Florida
Statutes Chapter 171.
Objective A.6.4: Due to the built-out character of the City of Clearwater, compact urban development within the urban service area
shall be promoted through application of the Clearwater Community Development Code.
Objective A.7.2: Diversify and expand the City’s tax base through the annexation of a variety of land uses located within the
Clearwater Planning Area.
· The proposed Residential Low (RL), Preservation (P) and Drainage Feature Overlay Future Land Use Map
categories are consistent with the current Countywide Plan designation of the properties. The Residential Low
(RL) designation primarily permits residential uses at a density of 5.0 units per acre. The Preservation (P) and
Drainage Feature Overlay categories proposed to be applied to one property (1744 Evans Drive) recognize the
watershed and drainage feature on the property. The proposed zoning districts to be assigned to the properties are
the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and Preservation (P) District. The uses of the subject
Cover Memo
Item # 17
properties are consistent with the uses allowed in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District. All of the
properties meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District;
therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with the Countywide Plan, Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, and
Clearwater Community Development Code; and
· The properties proposed for annexation are contiguous to existing City boundaries along at least one property boundary; therefore,
the annexations are consistent with Florida Statutes Chapter 171.044.
Review Approval:1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Assistant City Manager 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 17
LOCATION MAP
Owner MULTIPLE OWNERS Case: ATA2013-01001
Site: DIANE AREA PHASE E: Multiple lots south of Sunset Point
Road, east of US 19 and north of SR 590 (see next page)
Property Size (Acres):
Rights-of-way (Acres):
2.57 acres
1.64 acres
Land Use Zoning
PIN: Parcels—see next
page From:
To:
RL, P (County) R-3 (County)
RL, P / Drainage Feature LMDR, P (City)
Overlay (City) Atlas Page: 264A
TERRACE
DR
D R
CIR
WOODRING
SOUTH
DR
HARBOR
DR
OWEN
OWEN
DR
SKYLAND
LUCAS
EVANS
DR DR
MARILYN
DR
DR
AUD
RE
Y
CARLTON
Co
a
c
h
m
a
n
DR
CARDINAL
Pl
a
z
a
AUDREY
DR
CA
RD
INAL
DR
MORNINGSIDE
N TERRACE
DR
D R
CR-576
SPR
DIANE
GROVE
DR
THOMAS
DR
DR
DIANE
ANTHONY
DRDR
ST CROIX
EL TRINIDAD
ST JOHN
S
T
E
TER
D
Winwood Dr
C
SA
ST CR
DR
SR-590
SUNSET POINT RD
[
PROJECT
SITE
-N
o
t
t
o
S
c
a
l
e
-
-N
o
t
a
S
u
r
v
e
y
-
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 11
Item # 17
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Owner MULTIPLE OWNERS Case: ATA2013-01001
Site: DIANE AREA PHASE E: Multiple lots south of Sunset Point
Road, east of US 19 and north of SR 590 (see next page)
Property Size (Acres):
Rights-of-way (Acres):
2.57 acres
1.64 acres
Land Use Zoning
PIN: Parcels—see next
page From:
To:
RL, P (County) R-3 (County)
RL, P / Drainage Feature LMDR, P (City)
Overlay (City) Atlas Page: 264A
1716
1733
1765
1744
27242720
1806
1848
1851
18 61
1880
2
7
2
8
2
7
2
4
SR 590 SR 590
EVANS DR
EVANS DR
OW
EN DR
OW
EN DR
LUCAS DR
LUCAS DR
MORNINGSID E D R MO RNIN GSIDE DR
SOUTH DR SOUTH DR
DIANE DR
DIANE DR
GROVE DR
GROVE DR
WOODRING DR WOODRING DR
AUDREY DR
AUDREY DR
ST. CROIX DR
ST. CROIX DR THOMAS DR
THOMAS DR
TERRACE DR TERRACE DR
EL TRINDAD
DR E
EL TRINDAD DR E
SKYLAND DR
SKYLAND DR
MARILYN DR
MA
RILYN DR
ST.
A
NT
H
O
N
Y
D
R
S
T. A
N
TH
ONY D
R
CARDINAL DR
CARDINAL DR DIAN E TER DIANE T ER
N T ERRACE DR N TERRACE DR
WINWOOD DR
WINWOOD DR
AUDREY DR
AUDREY DR
OWEN DR
OWEN DR
-N
o
t
t
o
S
c
a
l
e
-
-N
o
t
a
S
u
r
v
e
y
-
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 11
Item # 17
PROPOSED ANNEXATION MAP
Owner MULTIPLE OWNERS Case: ATA2013-01001
Site: DIANE AREA PHASE E: Multiple lots south of Sunset Point
Road, east of US 19 and north of SR 590 (see next page)
Property Size (Acres):
Rights-of-way (Acres):
2.57 acres
1.64 acres
Land Use Zoning
PIN: Parcels—see next
page From:
To:
RL, P (County) R-3 (County)
RL, P / Drainage Feature LMDR, P (City)
Overlay (City) Atlas Page: 264A
60
6
0
60
60
6 0
50
50 50
50 50
50 60
60
60
60 60
6 0
50
50
50 50
50
60
66 66
66
66
66
66
66 66
66
66
66
60
60
60
6 0
60
50
50
50
30
30
50
66
6
0
3536
13554
71424
94392
94374
94356
94338
94320
94410
21092
98470
B
F
K
D E E G H I
J
L
A
7 6 6 5 5 44 2 2
3
3 3 3 3
1
A A
B
C
D
J
2
1
2
3
7
8
9
10
11
17181920212223 24 25 2627
34 5 6 7 8
91011121314
1 23 4 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
151617181920
0
1
2
13
4
5
6 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
12345 6 789 10
1 23456 7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2223
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
3637
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
5051
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
6465
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 12345678910111213141516
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 1920212223 24 25 26 2
1 2 3 4 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
1 3
24
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1
2 345 6 7
8
9
101112131415
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910
11 12
13141516171819
31/01
5.85
14.75
42/01
42/02
25.9
60 5060
5050
60
50 5060 606060
8496012021341
20 4391234567891011
1
TRACT A
22/01
A C(C)
A C(C)
1
1
1
A C
1716
1733
1765
1744
27242720
1806
1848
1851
18 61
1880
2
7
2
8
2
7
2
4
SR 590
EVANS DR
OW
EN DR
LUCAS DR
SOUTH DR
MO RNIN GSIDE DR
DIANE DR
GROVE DR
WOODRING DR
AUDREY DR
ST. CROIX DR
THOMAS DR
TERRACE DR
EL TRINDAD
DR E
SKYLAND DR
MARILYN DR
CARDINAL DR DIANE TER
N TERRACE DR
AUDREY DR
OWEN DR
-N
o
t
t
o
S
c
a
l
e
-
-N
o
t
a
S
u
r
v
e
y
-
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 11
Item # 17
FUTURE LAND USE MAP
Owner MULTIPLE OWNERS Case: ATA2013-01001
Site: DIANE AREA PHASE E: Multiple lots south of Sunset Point
Road, east of US 19 and north of SR 590 (see next page)
Property Size (Acres):
Rights-of-way (Acres):
2.57 acres
1.64 acres
Land Use Zoning
PIN: Parcels—see next
page From:
To:
RL, P (County) R-3 (County)
RL, P / Drainage Feature LMDR, P (City)
Overlay (City) Atlas Page: 264A
P*
1716
1733
1765
1744
27242720
1806
1848
1851
18 61
1880
2
7
2
8
2
7
2
4
IRL
RL
RLRLRL RLRLRL
RL RU
RL
RU
RL
RL
RL RL RL
RU
RL
RL
RL
RM
RL
RL
RM
P
RL
P
RU
RU
RL
RURLRLRU
RU
RU
RL
RU
RU
RU
RL
SR 590
EVAN
S D
R OW
EN DR
LUCAS DR
SOUTH DR
MO RNIN GSIDE DR
DIANE DR
GROVE DR
WOODRING DR
AUDREY DR
ST. CROIX DR
THOMAS DR
TERRACE DR
EL TRINDAD
DR E
SKYLAND DR
MARILYN DR
DIANE TER
N TERRACE DR
WINWOOD DR
AUDREY DR
OWEN DR
-N
o
t
t
o
S
c
a
l
e
-
-N
o
t
a
S
u
r
v
e
y
-
* - Parcel 1744
Evans Dr. has “P”
(Preservation) and
Drainage Feature
Overlay
classifications in the
rear of the property.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 4 of 11
Item # 17
ZONING MAP
Owner MULTIPLE OWNERS Case: ATA2013-01001
Site: DIANE AREA PHASE E: Multiple lots south of Sunset Point
Road, east of US 19 and north of SR 590 (see next page)
Property Size (Acres):
Rights-of-way (Acres):
2.57 acres
1.64 acres
Land Use Zoning
PIN: Parcels—see next
page From:
To:
RL, P (County) R-3 (County)
RL, P / Drainage Feature LMDR, P (City)
Overlay (City) Atlas Page: 264A
P*
1716
1733
1765
1744
27242720
1806
1848
1851
18 61
1880
2
7
2
8
2
7
2
4
SR 590
EVANS DR
OW
EN DR
LUCAS DR
SOUTH DR
MO RNIN GSIDE DR
DIANE DR
GROVE DR
WOODRING DR
AUDREY DR
ST. CROIX DR THOMAS DR
TERRACE DR
EL TRINDAD DR E
SKYLAND DR
MARILYN DR
S
T.
A
N
THONY D
R
CARDINAL DR DIANE TER
N TERRACE DR
WINWOOD DR
AUDREY DR
OWEN DR
LMDR
O
LMDR
P
P
MDR
-N
o
t
t
o
S
c
a
l
e
-
-N
o
t
a
S
u
r
v
e
y
-
* - Parcel 1744
Evans Dr. has
Zoning “P”
(Preservation)
in the rear of
the properties
*Parcel at 1744 Evans
Dr. will have “P”
(Preservation) zoning in
the rear of the property
to reflect corresponding
Future Land Use
designation.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 5 of 11
Item # 17
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
Owner MULTIPLE OWNERS Case: ATA2013-01001
Site: DIANE AREA PHASE E: Multiple lots south of Sunset Point
Road, east of US 19 and north of SR 590 (see next page)
Property Size (Acres):
Rights-of-way (Acres):
2.57 acres
1.64 acres
Land Use Zoning
PIN: Parcels—see next
page From:
To:
RL, P (County) R-3 (County)
RL, P / Drainage Feature LMDR, P (City)
Overlay (City) Atlas Page: 264A
60
6
0
60
60
6 0
50
50 50
50 50
50 60
60
60
60 60
6 0
50
50
50 50
50
60
66 66
66
66
66
66
66 66
66
66
66
60
60
60
6 0
60
50
50
50
30
30
50
66
6
0
3536
13554
71424
94392
94374
94356
94338
94320
94410
21092
98470
B
F
K
D E E G H I
J
L
A
7 6 6 5 5 44 2 2
3
3 3 3 3
1
A A
B
C
D
J
2
1
2
3
7
8
9
10
11
17181920212223 24 25 2627
34 5 6 7 8
91011121314
1 23 4 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
151617181920
0
1
2
13
4
5
6 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
89
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
12345 6 789 10
1 23456 7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2223
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
3637
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
5051
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
6465
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 12345678910111213141516
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 1920212223 24 25 26 2
1 2 3 4 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1516
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
1 3
24
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1
2 345 6 7
8
9
101112131415
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
910
11 12
13141516171819
31/01
5.85
14.75
42/01
42/02
25.9
60 5060
5050
60
50 5060 606060
8496012021341
20 4391234567891011
1
TRACT A
22/01
A C(C)
A C(C)
1
1
1
A C
1716
1733
1765
1744
27242720
1806
1848
1851
18 61
1880
2
7
2
8
2
7
2
4
SR 590
EVANS DR
OW
EN DR
LUCAS DR
SOUTH DR
MO RNIN GSIDE DR
DIANE DR
GROVE DR
WOODRING DR
AUDREY DR
ST. CROIX DR
THOMAS DR
TERRACE DR
EL TRINDAD
DR E
SKYLAND DR
MARILYN DR
CARDINAL DR DIANE TER
N TERRACE DR
AUDREY DR
OWEN DR
-N
o
t
t
o
S
c
a
l
e
-
-N
o
t
a
S
u
r
v
e
y
-
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Attachment number 1 \nPage 6 of 11
Item # 17
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
ATA2013‐01001 (Diane Area ATAs, Phase E)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel ID Legal Description Address
05-29-16-13554-010-0010 Lot 1, Block J 1861 Diane Drive
05-29-16-13554-006-0100 Lot 10, Block F 1880 Diane Drive
05-29-16-13554-007-0100 Lot 10, Block G 1806 Marilyn Drive
05-29-16-13554-008-0080 Lot 8, Block H 2720 Morningside Drive
05-29-16-13554-008-0090 Lot 9, Block H 2724 Morningside Drive
05-29-16-13554-008-0170 Lot 17, Block H 1848 Skyland Drive
05-29-16-13554-009-0010 Lot 1, Block I 1851 Skyland Drive
05-29-16-13554-006-0150 Lot 15, Block F 2724 Woodring Drive
05-29-16-13554-006-0140 Lot 14, Block F 2728 Woodring Drive
together with:
All Right of Way of Woodring Drive abutting Lot 15, Block F thru Lot 1, Block J, and all Right of Way of
Skyland Dr. abutting Lot 1, Block I, and Lot 9, Block H, and all Right of Way of Marilyn Dr. abutting Lot 8,
Block H
all the above in Carlton Terrace First Addition subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 43 on Page 39, of the
Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel ID Legal Description Address
05-29-16-94338-004-0050 Lot 5, Block 4 1716 Grove Dr.
05-29-16-94338-002-0220 Lot 22, Block 2 1733 Grove Dr.
together with:
All Right of Way of Grove Drive abutting Lot 5, Block 4
all the above in Virginia Grove Terrace First Addition subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 37 on Page 62, of
the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel ID Legal Description Address
05-29-16-94374-005-0160 Lot 16, Block 5 1765 Lucas Dr.
together with:
All Right of Way of Lucas Drive and Terrace Drive abutting Lot 16, Block 5
all the above in Virginia Grove Terrace Third Addition subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 37 on Page 74, of
the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel ID Legal Description Address
05-29-16-94392-007-0120 Lot 12, Block 7 1744 Evans Dr.
all the above in Virginia Grove Terrace Fourth Addition subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 37 on Page 75, of
the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment number 1 \nPage 7 of 11
Item # 17
1861 Diane Drive1880 Diane Drive
1806 Marilyn Drive2720 Morningside Drive
2724 Morningside Drive1848 SkylandDrivegy
ATA2013-01001
“Diane” Area –Phase E (13 lots)
Generally located south of Sunset Point Road, east of US 19, and north of State Road 590
Page 1 of 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 8 of 11
Item # 17
1851 SkylandDrive2724 WoodringDrive
2728 WoodringDrive1716 Grove Drive
1733 Grove Drive1765 Lucas DriveATA2013-01001
“Diane” Area –Phase E (13 lots)
Generally located south of Sunset Point Road, east of US 19, and north of State Road 590
Page 2 of 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 9 of 11
Item # 17
1744 Evans DriveLooking westerly along WoodringDrive
Looking easterly along WoodringDriveLooking northerly along Marilyn Drive
Looking southerly along SkylandDriveLooking northerly along SkylandDrive
ATA2013-01001
“Diane” Area –Phase E (13 lots)
Generally located south of Sunset Point Road, east of US 19, and north of State Road 590
Page 3 of 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 10 of 11
Item # 17
Looking southerly along Evans DriveLooking southerly along Lucas Drive
Looking easterly along Terrace DriveLooking northerly along Grove Drive
ATA2013-01001
“Diane” Area –Phase E (13 lots)
Generally located south of Sunset Point Road, east of US 19, and north of State Road 590
Page 4 of 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 11 of 11
Item # 17
Ordinance No. 8392-13
ORDINANCE NO. 8392-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED GENERALLY EAST OF US HIGHWAY 19,
NORTH OF SR 590, AND SOUTH OF SUNSET POINT
ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF SECTION 5,
TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST
OFFICE ADDRESSES ARE 1861 AND 1880 DIANE DRIVE,
1806 MARILYN DRIVE, 2720 AND 2724 MORNINGSIDE
DRIVE, 1848 AND 1851 SKYLAND DRIVE, 2724 AND 2728
WOODRING DRIVE, 1716 AND 1733 GROVE DRIVE, 1765
LUCAS DRIVE AND 1744 EVANS DRIVE TOGETHER WITH
ALL RIGHT OF WAY OF WOODRING DRIVE ABUTTING
LOT 15, BLOCK F THRU LOT 1, BLOCK J, AND ALL RIGHT
OF WAY OF SKYLAND DRIVE ABUTTING LOT 1, BLOCK I,
AND LOT 9, BLOCK H, AND ALL RIGHT OF WAY OF
MARILYN DRIVE ABUTTING LOT 8, BLOCK H IN
CARLTON TERRACE FIRST ADDITION SUBDIVISION; ALL
RIGHT OF WAY OF GROVE DRIVE ABUTTING LOT 5,
BLOCK 4, IN VIRGINIA GROVE TERRACE FIRST
ADDITION SUBDIVISION; ALL RIGHT OF WAY OF LUCAS
DRIVE AND TERRACE DRIVE ABUTTING LOT 16, BLOCK
5, IN VIRGINIA GROVE TERRACE THIRD ADDITION
SUBDIVISION INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE
CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE
CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the
map attached hereto as Exhibit B has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the
property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has
complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance;
now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of
Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
See attached legal descriptions, Exhibit A. (ATA2013-01001)
The map attached as Exhibit B is hereby incorporated by reference.
Attachment number 2 \nPage 1 of 4
Item # 17
Ordinance No. 8392-13
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be
consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Council hereby
accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the
public, which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed
property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning and Development Director
are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and
records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City
Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with
the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County,
Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida
Department of State within 30 days after adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
________________________________
George N. Cretekos
Mayor
Approved as to form: Attest:
___________________________ ____________________________________
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Rosemarie Call
Assistant City Attorney City Clerk
Attachment number 2 \nPage 2 of 4
Item # 17
Attachment number 2 \nPage 3 of 4
Item # 17
Attachment number 2 \nPage 4 of 4
Item # 17
Ordinance No. 8393-13
ORDINANCE NO. 8393-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE
LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED
GENERALLY EAST OF US HIGHWAY 19, NORTH OF SR 590,
AND SOUTH OF SUNSET POINT ROAD, CONSISTING OF A
PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16
EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESSES ARE 1861 AND
1880 DIANE DRIVE, 1806 MARILYN DRIVE, 2720 AND 2724
MORNINGSIDE DRIVE, 1848 AND 1851 SKYLAND DRIVE, 2724
AND 2728 WOODRING DRIVE, 1716 AND 1733 GROVE DRIVE,
1765 LUCAS DRIVE AND 1744 EVANS DRIVE TOGETHER
WITH ALL RIGHT OF WAY OF WOODRING DRIVE ABUTTING
LOT 15, BLOCK F THRU LOT 1, BLOCK J, AND ALL RIGHT OF
WAY OF SKYLAND DRIVE ABUTTING LOT 1, BLOCK I, AND
LOT 9, BLOCK H, AND ALL RIGHT OF WAY OF MARILYN
DRIVE ABUTTING LOT 8, BLOCK H IN CARLTON TERRACE
FIRST ADDITION SUBDIVISION; ALL RIGHT OF WAY OF
GROVE DRIVE ABUTTING LOT 5, BLOCK 4, IN VIRGINIA
GROVE TERRACE FIRST ADDITION SUBDIVISION; ALL RIGHT
OF WAY OF LUCAS DRIVE AND TERRACE DRIVE ABUTTING
LOT 16, BLOCK 5, IN VIRGINIA GROVE TERRACE THIRD
ADDITION SUBDIVISION, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL LOW (RL),
PRESERVATION (P), AND DRAINAGE FEATURE OVERLAY;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan
of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is
consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of
Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property,
upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows:
Property Land Use Category
See attached legal descriptions, Exhibit A Residential Low (RL)
(ATA2013- 01001) Preservation (P)
Drainage Feature Overlay
The map attached as Exhibit B is hereby incorporated by reference.
Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with
the City’s comprehensive plan.
Attachment number 3 \nPage 1 of 4
Item # 17
Ordinance No. 8393-13
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon
and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 8392-13.
PASSED ON FIRST READING _____________________
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL _____________________
READING AND ADOPTED
__________________________
George N. Cretekos
Mayor
Approved as to form: Attest:
__________________________ __________________________
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Rosemarie Call
Assistant City Attorney City Clerk
Attachment number 3 \nPage 2 of 4
Item # 17
Attachment number 3 \nPage 3 of 4
Item # 17
Attachment number 3 \nPage 4 of 4
Item # 17
Ordinance No. 8394-13
ORDINANCE NO. 8394-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY
BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED
GENERALLY EAST OF US HIGHWAY 19, NORTH OF SR
590, AND SOUTH OF SUNSET POINT ROAD,
CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP
29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESSES ARE 1861 AND 1880 DIANE DRIVE, 1806
MARILYN DRIVE, 2720 AND 2724 MORNINGSIDE DRIVE,
1848 AND 1851 SKYLAND DRIVE, 2724 AND 2728
WOODRING DRIVE, 1716 AND 1733 GROVE DRIVE, 1765
LUCAS DRIVE AND 1744 EVANS DRIVE TOGETHER WITH
ALL RIGHT OF WAY OF WOODRING DRIVE ABUTTING
LOT 15, BLOCK F THRU LOT 1, BLOCK J, AND ALL RIGHT
OF WAY OF SKYLAND DRIVE ABUTTING LOT 1, BLOCK I,
AND LOT 9, BLOCK H, AND ALL RIGHT OF WAY OF
MARILYN DRIVE ABUTTING LOT 8, BLOCK H IN
CARLTON TERRACE FIRST ADDITION SUBDIVISION; ALL
RIGHT OF WAY OF GROVE DRIVE ABUTTING LOT 5,
BLOCK 4, IN VIRGINIA GROVE TERRACE FIRST
ADDITION SUBDIVISION; ALL RIGHT OF WAY OF LUCAS
DRIVE AND TERRACE DRIVE ABUTTING LOT 16, BLOCK
5, IN VIRGINIA GROVE TERRACE THIRD ADDITION
SUBDIVISION; UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, AS LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(LMDR) AND PRESERVATION (P); PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the
City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is
hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning
atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property Zoning District
See attached legal descriptions, Low Medium Density
Exhibit A Residential (LMDR)
(ATA2013-01001) Preservation (P)
The map attached as Exhibit B is hereby incorporated by reference.
Attachment number 4 \nPage 1 of 4
Item # 17
Ordinance No. 8394-13
Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in
accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 8392-13.
PASSED ON FIRST READING ___________________________
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL ___________________________
READING AND ADOPTED
_______________________________
George N. Cretekos
Mayor
Approved as to form: Attest:
__________________________ ______________________________
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Rosemarie Call
Assistant City Attorney City Clerk
Attachment number 4 \nPage 2 of 4
Item # 17
Attachment number 4 \nPage 3 of 4
Item # 17
Attachment number 4 \nPage 4 of 4
Item # 17
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Annexation, Initial Land Use Plan Designation of Residential Low (RL) and Initial Zoning Atlas Designation of Low
Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District for 1825 Carlton Drive (Lot 4, Block C, Carlton Terrace in Section 5, Township 29
South, Range 16 East); and pass Ordinances 8389-13, 8390-13 and 8391-13 on first reading. (ANX2013-01002)
SUMMARY:
This voluntary annexation petition involves a 0.176-acre property consisting of one parcel of land occupied by a
single-family dwelling. It is located on the east side of Carlton Drive, approximately 233 feet south of Woodring
Drive. The applicant is requesting this annexation in order to receive sanitary sewer and solid waste service from the
City. The property is located within an enclave and is contiguous to existing City boundaries to the west. It is proposed
that the property be assigned a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Low (RL) and a zoning category of
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR).
The Planning and Development Department determined that the proposed annexation is consistent with the provisions of Community
Development Code Section 4-604.E as follows:
The property currently receives water service from the City. The closest sanitary sewer line is located in the adjacent Carlton Drive
right-of-way. The applicant has paid the City's sewer impact and assessment fees and is aware of the additional costs to extend City
sewer service to this property. Collection of solid waste will be provided by the City of Clearwater. The property is located within
Police District III and service will be administered through the district headquarters located at 2851 N. McMullen Booth Road. Fire and
emergency medical services will be provided to this property by Station 48 located at 1700 N. Belcher Road. The City has adequate
capacity to serve this property with sanitary sewer, solid waste, police, fire and EMS service. The proposed annexation will not have an
adverse effect on public facilities and their levels of service; and
The proposed annexation is consistent with and promotes the following objective of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan:
Objective A.6.4 Due to the built-out character of the City of Clearwater, compact urban development within the urban service
area shall be promoted through application of the Clearwater Community Development Code.
Objective A.7.2 Diversify and expand the City’s tax base through the annexation of a variety of land uses located within the
Clearwater Planning Area.
Policy A.7.2.3 Continue to process voluntary annexations for single-family residential properties upon request.
The proposed RL Future Land Use Plan category is consistent with the current Countywide Plan designation of this property.
This designation primarily permits residential uses at a density of 5 units per acre. The proposed zoning district to be assigned to
the property is the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District. The use of the subject property is consistent with the uses
allowed in the District and the property exceeds the District’s minimum dimensional requirements. The proposed annexation is
therefore consistent with the Countywide Plan and the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code; and
The property proposed for annexation is contiguous to existing City boundaries to the west; therefore, the
annexation is consistent with Florida Statutes Chapter 171.044.
Review Approval:1) Office of Management and Budget 2) Legal 3) Clerk 4) Assistant City Manager 5) City Manager 6) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 18
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations (ANX)\Active Cases\Carlton Drive 1825 ANX2013-01002 - Granata\Maps\ANX2013-
01002 Location Map.doc
SKYLINE
LAWSON
TERRACE
E
R U NSTAG
DR
D R
CIR
WOODRING
SOUTH
DR
HARBOR
DR
OWEN
OWEN
DR
SKYLAND
LUCAS
EVANS
DR DR
MARILYN
DR
DR
AUDREY
CARLTON
B L V D
Co
a
c
h
m
a
n
DR
CARDINAL
Pl
a
z
a
AUDREY
DR
CARDINAL
DR
MORNINGSIDE
N TERRACE
DR
D R
C
DIANE
GROVE
DR
THOMAS
DR
DR
DIANE
TER
Winwood Dr
DR
DR
HAAS AVE
ROBINWOOD
SR-590
SUNSET POINT RD
[
PROJECT
SITE
U
S
H
IG
H
W
A
Y
1
9
N
S
R
5
5
-N
o
t
t
o
S
c
a
l
e
-
-N
o
t
a
S
u
r
v
e
y
-
LOCATION MAP
Owner: Granata, Joseph and Kelly Case: ANX2013-01002
Site: 1825 Carlton Drive Property
Size (Acres): 0.176 acres
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 05-29-16-13536-003-0040
From :
To:
RL R-3
RL LMDR Atlas Page: 264A
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 7
Item # 18
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations (ANX)\Active Cases\Carlton Drive 1825 ANX2013-01002 - Granata\Maps\ANX2013-
01002 Aerial Photograph.doc
US 19
US 19
SOUTH DR SOUTH DR
CARLTON DR
CARLTON DR
AUDREY D
R
AUDREY DR
CARDINAL DR
CARDINAL DR
WOODRING DR WOODRING DR
MORNIN GSID E D R MO RNINGSIDE DR
AUDREY DR
AUDREY D
R
-N
o
t
t
o
S
c
a
l
e
-
-N
o
t
a
S
u
r
v
e
y
-
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Owner: Granata, Joseph and Kelly Case: ANX2013-01002
Site: 1825 Carlton Drive Property
Size (Acres): 0.176 acres
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 05-29-16-13536-003-0040
From :
To:
RL R-3
RL LMDR Atlas Page: 264A
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 7
Item # 18
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations (ANX)\Active Cases\Carlton Drive 1825 ANX2013-01002 - Granata\Maps\ANX2013-
01002 Proposed Annexation Map.doc
SEE PLAT FOR DIMENSIONS*
100
66
60
60
60
60
50
50 50
50
13536 B
C D E
A
78910
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 161718192021 22 23
123 4 5 6 7 8
910111213141516
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
17 1 23456
32/01
1.04
3.28
32/02
32/03
2.88
33/01
32/021
100
100
151.15
146.65
100
153.68
41/01
)
1
A C
A C(C)
A C(C)
US 19
SOUTH DR
CARLTON DR
AUDREY DR
CARDINAL DR
WOODRING DR
MO RNINGSIDE DR
239
238
236
26
3
7
26
7
1
26
4
3
26
4
9
26
5
4
26
6
5
26
5
9
26
7
7
26
2
5
1818
1836
1807
1813
1819
1831
1837
1807
1815
1821
1825
1831
1837
1800
1812
1830
1836
26
6
5
2672
1813
1819
1825
1831
2674
2670
2664
2658
2652
2675
2641
2665
2671
2653
2647
1836
1860
2612
2618
2624
2634
2636
2642
2648
2654
2660
2666
2672
1837
2675
1866
1854
1848
1842
1830
1812
1806
1804 1800
1806
1865
2635
2645
2650
1801
1824
1818
1800
2631
1843
23837
23611
237
1812
1824
1830
1824
1807
2659
2684
2646
2640
2634
1818
1806
1825
-N
o
t
t
o
S
c
a
l
e
-
-N
o
t
a
S
u
r
v
e
y
-
PROPOSED ANNEXATION MAP
Owner: Granata, Joseph and Kelly Case: ANX2013-01002
Site: 1825 Carlton Drive Property
Size (Acres): 0.176 acres
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 05-29-16-13536-003-0040
From :
To:
RL R-3
RL LMDR Atlas Page: 264A
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 7
Item # 18
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations (ANX)\Active Cases\Carlton Drive 1825 ANX2013-01002 - Granata\Maps\ANX2013-
01002 Future Land Use Map.doc
R/O/R
RL RL RL
RL
RL
RM
CG
RL
CL
RU
R/O/R
CL
US 19
SOUTH DR
CARLTON DR
AUDREY D
R
CARDINAL DR
WOODRING DR
MO RNINGSIDE DR
AUDREY DR
239
238
236
26
3
7
26
7
1
26
4
3
26
4
9
26
5
4
26
6
5
26
5
9
26
7
7
26
2
5
1812
1818
1824
1836
1830
1807
1813
1819
1831
1837
1807
1815
1821
1825
1831
1837
1800
1812
1824
1830
1836
26
6
5
2672
1807
1813
1819
1825
1831
2674
2670
2664
2658
2652
2675
2641
2659
2665
2671
2653
2647
1836
1860
2612
2618
2624
2634
2636
2648
2654
2660
2666
2672
2684
1837
2675
1866
1854
1848
1842
1830
1812
1806
1804 1800
1806
1865
2635
2645
2646
2640
2634
1818
1806
2650
1801
1818
1800
2631
1843
23837
23611
237
2642
1825
1824
-N
o
t
t
o
S
c
a
l
e
-
-N
o
t
a
S
u
r
v
e
y
-
FUTURE LAND USE MAP
Owner: Granata, Joseph and Kelly Case: ANX2013-01002
Site: 1825 Carlton Drive Property
Size (Acres): 0.176 acres
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 05-29-16-13536-003-0040
From :
To:
RL R-3
RL LMDR Atlas Page: 264A
RL
Attachment number 1 \nPage 4 of 7
Item # 18
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations (ANX)\Active Cases\Carlton Drive 1825 ANX2013-01002 - Granata\Maps\ANX2013-
01002 Zoning Map.doc
US 19
SOUTH DR
CARLTON DR
AUDREY D
R
CARDINAL DR
WOODRING DR
MO RNINGSIDE DR
AUDREY DR
C
MDR
LMDR
LMDR
LMDR
LMDR
LMDR
239
238
236
26
3
7
26
7
1
26
4
3
26
4
9
26
5
4
26
6
5
26
5
9
26
7
7
26
2
5
1812
1818
1824
1836
1830
1807
1813
1819
1831
1807
1815
1821
1825
1831
1837
1800
1812
1824
1830
1836
26
6
5
2672
1807
1813
1819
1825
1831
2674
2670
2664
2658
2652
2675
2641
2659
2665
2671
2653
2647
2624
26
34
2636
2642
2648
2654
2660
2666
2672
2684
1837
2675
1866
1854
1848
1842
1830
1812
1806
1804 1800
1806
1865
2635
2645
2646
2640
2634
1818
1806
2650
1801
1824
1818
1800
2631
1843
23837
23611
237
1837
1836
1860
2612
2618
1825
-N
o
t
t
o
S
c
a
l
e
-
-N
o
t
a
S
u
r
v
e
y
-
ZONING MAP
Owner: Granata, Joseph and Kelly Case: ANX2013-01002
Site: 1825 Carlton Drive Property
Size (Acres): 0.176 acres
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 05-29-16-13536-003-0040
From :
To:
RL R-3
RL LMDR Atlas Page: 264A
LMDR
Attachment number 1 \nPage 5 of 7
Item # 18
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Annexations (ANX)\Active Cases\Carlton Drive 1825 ANX2013-01002 - Granata\Maps\ANX2013-
01002 Existing Surrounding Uses Map.doc
SEE PLAT FOR DIMENSIONS*
100
66
60
60
60
60
50
50 50
50
13536 B
C D E
A
78910
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 161718192021 22 23
123 4 5 6 7 8
910111213141516
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
17 1 23456
32/01
1.04
3.28
32/02
32/03
2.88
33/01
32/021
100
100
151.15
146.65
100
153.68
41/01
)
1
A C
A C(C)
A C(C)
US 19
SOUTH DR
CARLTON DR
AUDREY DR
CARDINAL DR
WOODRING DR
MO RNINGSIDE DR
239
238
236
26
3
7
26
7
1
26
4
3
26
4
9
26
5
4
26
6
5
26
5
9
26
7
7
26
2
5
1818
1836
1807
1813
1819
1831
1837
1807
1815
1821
1825
1831
1837
1800
1812
1830
1836
26
6
5
2672
1813
1819
1825
1831
2674
2670
2664
2658
2652
2675
2641
2665
2671
2653
2647
1836
1860
2612
2618
2624
2634
2636
2642
2648
2654
2660
2666
2672
1837
2675
1866
1854
1848
1842
1830
1812
1806
1804 1800
1806
1865
2635
2645
2650
1801
1824
1818
1800
2631
1843
23837
23611
237
1812
1824
1830
1824
1807
2659
2684
2646
2640
2634
1818
1806
1825
-N
o
t
t
o
S
c
a
l
e
-
-N
o
t
a
S
u
r
v
e
y
-
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP
Owner: Granata, Joseph and Kelly Case: ANX2013-01002
Site: 1825 Carlton Drive Property
Size (Acres): 0.176 acres
Land Use Zoning
PIN: 05-29-16-13536-003-0040
From :
To:
RL R-3
RL LMDR Atlas Page: 264A
Single Family Homes
Single Family Homes
Multi Family Homes Truck
Rental
Vacant
Commercial
Va
c
a
n
t
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
O
f
f
i
c
e
Single Family Homes
Attachment number 1 \nPage 6 of 7
Item # 18
ANX2013-01002
Granata, Joseph and Kelly
1825 Carlton Drive
View looking east at the subject property, 1825 Carlton Drive
North of the subject property
Across the street, to the west of the subject
property
South of the subject property
View looking northerly along Carlton Drive View looking southerly along Carlton Drive
Attachment number 1 \nPage 7 of 7
Item # 18
Ordinance No. 8389 -13
ORDINANCE NO. 8389-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARLTON DRIVE
APPROXIMATELY 233 FEET SOUTH OF WOODRING
DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 4, BLOCK C, CARLTON
TERRACE, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1825
CARLTON DRIVE, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF
THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF
THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the owner of the real property described herein and depicted on the
map attached hereto as Exhibit A has petitioned the City of Clearwater to annex the
property into the City pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes, and the City has
complied with all applicable requirements of Florida law in connection with this ordinance;
now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following-described property is hereby annexed into the City of
Clearwater and the boundary lines of the City are redefined accordingly:
Lot 4, Block C, Carlton Terrace, according to the plat thereof, as
recorded in Plat Book 41, Page 16, of the Public Records of Pinellas
County, Florida.
(ANX2013-01002)
The map attached as Exhibit A is hereby incorporated by reference.
Section 2. The provisions of this ordinance are found and determined to be
consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The City Council hereby
accepts the dedication of all easements, parks, rights-of-way and other dedications to the
public, which have heretofore been made by plat, deed or user within the annexed
property. The City Engineer, the City Clerk and the Planning and Development Director
are directed to include and show the property described herein upon the official maps and
records of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. The City
Clerk shall file certified copies of this ordinance, including the map attached hereto, with
the Clerk of the Circuit Court and with the County Administrator of Pinellas County,
Florida, within 7 days after adoption, and shall file a certified copy with the Florida
Department of State within 30 days after adoption.
Attachment number 2 \nPage 1 of 3
Item # 18
Ordinance No. 8389 -13
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED
________________________________
George N. Cretekos
Mayor
Approved as to form: Attest:
___________________________ ____________________________________
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Rosemarie Call
Assistant City Attorney City Clerk
Attachment number 2 \nPage 2 of 3
Item # 18
Attachment number 2 \nPage 3 of 3
Item # 18
Ordinance No. 8390-13
ORDINANCE NO. 8390-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE
LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
EAST SIDE OF CARLTON DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 233 FEET
SOUTH OF WOODRING DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 4,
BLOCK C, CARLTON TERRACE, WHOSE POST OFFICE
ADDRESS IS 1825 CARLTON DRIVE, UPON ANNEXATION
INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL LOW (RL);
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan
of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is
consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of
Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property,
upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows:
Property Land Use Category
Lot 4, Block C, Carlton Terrace according to the Residential Low (RL)
plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 41, Page 16,
of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
(ANX2013-01002)
The map attached as Exhibit A is hereby incorporated by reference.
Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with
the City’s comprehensive plan.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon
and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 8389-13.
PASSED ON FIRST READING _____________________
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL _____________________
READING AND ADOPTED
__________________________
George N. Cretekos
Mayor
Approved as to form: Attest:
__________________________ __________________________
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Rosemarie Call
Assistant City Attorney City Clerk
Attachment number 3 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # 18
Attachment number 3 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # 18
Ordinance No. 8391-13
ORDINANCE NO. 8391-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY
BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF CARLTON DRIVE APPROXIMATELY
233 FEET SOUTH OF WOODRING DRIVE, CONSISTING
OF LOT 4, BLOCK C, CARLTON TERRACE, WHOSE POST
OFFICE ADDRESS IS 1825 CARLTON DRIVE, UPON
ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS
LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LMDR);
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this
ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the
City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is
hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning
atlas of the City is amended, as follows:
Property Zoning District
Lot 4, Block C, Carlton Terrace, according Low Medium Density
to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book Residential (LMDR)
41, Page 16, of the Public Records of Pinellas
County, Florida.
(ANX2013-01002)
The map attached as Exhibit A is hereby incorporated by reference.
Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in
accordance with the foregoing amendment.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent
upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 8389-13.
PASSED ON FIRST READING ___________________________
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL ___________________________
READING AND ADOPTED
_______________________________
George N. Cretekos
Mayor
Attachment number 4 \nPage 1 of 3
Item # 18
Ordinance No. 8391-13
Approved as to form: Attest:
__________________________ ______________________________
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Rosemarie Call
Assistant City Attorney City Clerk
Attachment number 4 \nPage 2 of 3
Item # 18
Attachment number 4 \nPage 3 of 3
Item # 18
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Appoint members to the Public Art and Design Board as follows: two members with terms to expire April 30, 2017 and one member to
fill the remainder of an unexpired term to expire February 28, 2014.
SUMMARY:
APPOINTMENT WORKSHEET
BOARD: Public Art and Design Board
TERM: 4 years
APPOINTED BY: City Council
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Not Required
RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater resident except for the Clearwater Arts Alliance, Inc., formerly, Clearwater Arts Foundation,
and the Pinellas County Arts Council representatives
MEMBERS: 7
Liaison: Parks and Recreation
CHAIRPERSON: Howard Warshauer
MEETING DATE: Quarterly - March, June, Sep., Dec.
TIME/PLACE: Long Center
APPOINTMENTS NEEDED: 3
THE FOLLOWING BOARD MEMBER(S) HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW
TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW APPOINTEE:
1. Robert J. Entel – 521 Mandalay Ave., #902, 33767 - Physician
Original Appointment: 2/18/10
(Resigning due to work conflicts) – (serving 1st term to expire 2/28/14)
(Citizen)
2. John P. Timberlake – 2891 Sweetgum Way S., 33761 – Dir. Florida Operations
Office: Phillies Florida LLC, 601 Old Coachman Rd. N., 33765
Original Appointment: 4/6/06
Interest in reappointment: No, moving out of Clearwater - (Ending 2nd term to expire 3/31/13)
(Citizen)
3. Howard Warshauer – 808 Allen Dr., 33764 – Consultant
Original Appointment: 4/6/06
(2 Absences in the last year)
Interest in reappointment: Yes (Ending 2nd term to expire 3/31/13)
(Citizen)
THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FILL THE ABOVE VACANCIES:
1. Carolyn Byrd - 2636 Brewton Ct., 33761 – Retired College Professor
2. Karen Cunningham - 2392 Stag Run Blvd., 33765 – Retired/MPO Planner
3. Bruce Dennis - 1851 Glenville, 33765 – Housing Mgt./BS Business Adm.
4. Phyllis Franklin - 1861 Venetian Pt. Dr., 33755 - Realtor
5. Laurie Meggesin - 1600 Walnut St., 33755 – Former Atty/Non profit Mgt and Consulting
6. Michael Potts -1155 Jackson Rd., 33755 – General Contractor/Inspector
(Currently serving on NAHAB)
7. Eric Seiler - 2513 Dogwood Ct., 33761 – Construction Mgr.
8. Neale A. Stralow - 2257 Bascom Way, 33764 – Urban Planner/Landscape Architect
Cover Memo
Item # 19
Zip codes of current members:
1 – 33713
1 – 33755
1 – 33759
1 – 34683
Current Categories:
1 Architect; 1 Artist; 1 Pinellas County Arts Council; 1 Clearwater Arts Alliance, Inc.
Review Approval:1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 19
CITY OF CLEARWATER - APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS
must be Clearwater resident)
Name: Carolyn Byrd
Home Address:Office Address:
2636 Brewton Ct
Clearwater Zip 33761 Zip
Telephone: Telephone:
Cell Phone: 786-1156 E-mail Address: tecebe @att.net
How long a resident of Clearwater? 42 Years
Occupation Retired College Professor Employer:
Field of Education:Other WorkExperience: Seminole HS 3yrs
B.S. Comprehensive Business Education, NC A&T UNIV Dunedin HS, 4yrs
M.S. Human Resources Management, NOVA UNIV St. Petersburg College 28 Yrs
If retired, former occupation: Division of Business Technologies, Clearwater Campus
Community Activities: US Coast Guard Auxiliary - Clearwater Flotilla Sand Key
Ruth Eckerd Hall Usher/volunteer, City of Clearwater Parks and RecreationNolunteer
Other Interests: Disney Sports EnthusiastNolunteer
Board Service (current and past): Board Preference:
Current: Eckerd college 011ie Advisory Board Public Art and Design Board
Past: Head Start of Pinellas County
Additional Comments:
Signature: 641,14,,,, Date:March 24, 2013
See attached list for boards that require financial disclosure at time of appointment. Please return this
application and board questionnaire to the Official Records & Legislative Services Department, P. O. Box 4748,
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748, or drop off your application at City Hall, 2nd Floor, 112 S. Osceola Avenue.
Note: For boards requiring Clearwater residency, this application must be accompanied by a copy of
one of the following:
Current voter registration within city limits
Valid current Florida Drivers' License issued to an address within city limits
Declaration of Domicile filed with the city clerk affirming residency within city limits
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # 19
BOARD QUESTIONNAIRE
1. What is your understanding of the board's duties and responsibilities? This seven-
member board is tasked with developing guidelines, procedures and policies to administer
Clearwater's Public Art & Design Program and present recommendations for public art
purchases, commissions, and donations to the City Council.
2. Have you ever observed a board meeting either in person or on C-View, the City's TV
station?
Yes, I have viewed City Council and board meetings and attended several
3. What background and/or qualifications do you have that you feel would qualify you to
serve on this Board?
As you can see I have been a long time resident of Clearwater. I met my husband, Terry Byrd, here,
had my two sons, Vincent & Chris here, worked and retired here. I have always had an interest and
appreciation for the arts. I have taken many painting and photography classes here in Clearwater.
The beauty of the city has been the subject of many of my paintings and photographs. My travels
across the country and abroad always include tours of the city's architect and art museums. From
the Schomberg Center in NY, Art Institute of Chicago, the Spoleto Festival in Charleston, to the
Palace of Versailles and the Louvre in Paris, lust to name a few art fill places of the world I have had
the pleasure of visiting. I feel my love for the city I live in and the many years of not only loving and
appreciating the world of art but also learning and participating by creating art, qualifies me to serve
on Clearwater's Public Art and Design Advisory Board.
4. Why do you want to serve on this Board?
Because of my love for the city and it's beautification, by participating in keeping Clearwater the
beautiful city that it is by serving on the Public Art and Design Advisory Board, would allow me an
opportunity to share with the city how art has enlighten and been so benefitual to my life.
Name: Board Name: Carol Byrd
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # 19
CITY OF CLEARWATER -APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS
Name: Karen Cunningham
Home Address: Office Address:
2392 Stag Run Blvd
Clearwater, FL Zip 33765 Zip
Telephone: 727-724-8809 Telephone:
Cell Phone: 727-418-9803 E-mail Address: webfloateragmail.com
How long a resident of Clearwater? 32 years (18 within City limits)
Occupation: retired Employer:
Field of Education: Other Work Experience:
Undergraduate: Degrees in Education and in Interior Planner for Pinellas County MPO; teacher (middle
Design, and a Masters Degree in school and adult education); commercial interior
Communication (emphasis on public education designer/space planner,
issues)
If retired, former occupation: Recently retired after 11 years as a Program Planner for the Metropolitan
Planning Organization (Planning Dept of Pinellas County Government). I was also assigned regional planning
responsibilities.
Community Activities: Presently, I lead the Progress Energy Trail study committee of my Coachman Ridge
Neighborhood Homeowners Association, which is an Overlay District of the City of Clearwater. I also
volunteer as a writing teacher and a group leader at the Aging Well Center at Clearwater's Long Center.
Other Interests: Painting, drawing, writing. I participate as a student in various painting cases at the Dunedin
Art Center and other facilities. I am recently retired, and I travel to Europe and to various ens ited
States. I am currently restoring an Arts and Crafts bungalow in Brevard, North Carolina. L'1 ` La
MAR 1 1 2013
Board Service (current and past): Board Preference:
OFFICIAL RECOitba A,:<:1;
At various times I served on Boards (Example League Public Arts and Design AdvisliirMatE givcs BE E
of Women Voters). However, my position as a
planner restricted that participation in recent years
Additional Comments: In interior de - n courses, I studied history of art and architecture. As a
planner, I learned to val - the •rinciple of economic development and livable communities.
1 ./ ISignatures -41 1 Date: March 9, 2013
Attachment number 2 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # 19
BOARD QUESTIONNAIRE
l. What is your understanding of the board's duties and responsibilities?
Develop guidelines, procedures and policies to administer Clearwater's Public Art & Design program, and work
with other members to present recommendations for public art purchases, commissions, and donations to the
City.
2. Have you ever observed a board meeting either in person or on C-View, the City's TV station?
Yes. I was a planner for the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)/Pinellas County Government. As
such, I frequently observed board meetings of the MPO, and of the affiliated government agencies, including
the City Council of Clearwater. I am also a member of the Coachman Ridge Homeowners Association, which
gave me an interest in Clearwater's Board meetings.
3. What background and/or qualifications do you have that you feel would qualify you to serve on
this Board?
As a retired person, age 66, I have a varied professional background, including the fields of education, art and
design and planning. My undergraduate degree was in teaching. I had 10 years experience, serving middle
school to adult education levels. I then returned and got a degree in Interior Design from the Fashion Institute
of Technology in New York, one of the most prestigious design schools in the nation. I studied interior design
which included study of the history of architecture. I practiced commercial design and passed the NCIDQ
qualifying exam, becoming a professional member of American Society of Interior Designers (A.S.I.D). The
exam at that time had a heavy emphasis on designing for people with disabilities. I taught Interior Design at
Pinellas Technical Education Center.
After practicing interior design, I realized I wanted to return to academic studies and I completed my Masters
Degree. This resulted in a new career in community development, and eventually in a position as a planner. I
was promoted to the position of Program Planner, and during that time I took many training programs in
planning, community development, environmental justice, etc. I continued my interest in art and design by
taking many classes at the Dunedin Arts Center (pottery, painting, felting, etc.)
4. Why do you want to serve on this Board?
My interest is in balancing art and design, with the need for economic development and livable communities.
I believe my diverse background - namely my interest and education in art, architecture history and design —
will be useful in this voluntary position. But my experience in identifying public needs and wants and
responsibility for contributing to their implementation; and my realism concerning the financial limitations of
governments will be equally valuable.
Name:Karen Cunningham
Board Name: Public Art and Design Advisory
Attachment number 2 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # 19
M
s
CITY OF CLEARWATER -APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS
J
must be Clearwater resident)
Name: ,45-Ro ,e-
Home Address: , Offic Address:
61 4-6 P1''' - dso 7'2
i.42_ Zip '33:761r yd °, ,0 Zip -337
Telephone: 4217 6c3, 1-0( Telephone:7 ' ?
Cell Phone: E-mail Address: RG/C',11/53c) ,- 1;-*
How long a resident of`Clearwater? /77/41
Occupation: / itf y itl77 Employer: <.1,r
Field of Education: Other Work Experience:
If retired, former occupation:
Community Activities:‹ll Vol- M Z-vl 11-P z ere97 J4. e(57-
VoLuivrtErt
Other Interests:
Board Service (current and past): Board Preference:
i/J kw 1b O N f -P a av1 fdiv7 7 7(Al, J- /41 - 7W7
g -p ' —fit 1t9, A iff -Cr s 4 22/.`' ‘v Cef t)1 GEC-
voi Ad itional Go mends: -" oz/5" trkIffair 611/.1`, - .+ a P
7b jM17L 164y rblAiy,1
77
Signature: Date: j1-°9
See attached list for boards that require financial disclosure at time of appointment. Please return this
application and board questionnaire to the Official Records & Legislative Services Department, P. O. Box 4748,
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748, or drop off your application at City Hall, 2nd Floor, 112 S. Osceola Avenue.
r
Note: For boards requiring Clearwater residency, this application must be accompanied by a copy of
one of the following: r, ,
Current voter registration within city limits
Valid current Florida Drivers' License issued to an address within city limits
Declaration of Domicile filed with the city clerk affirming residency within city l*t*S 6 0 En
4/03 - PL, e,..,,e 1-it.
hws s hit 0%451 A.:+...
LEGISLATIVE s rocs DEFt
tkt P..61-;,c Qv--t 4. moil, I3",a_.
ft
Attachment number 3 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # 19
BOARD QUESTIONNAIRE
1. What is your understanding of the board's duties and responsibilities?
A-24 .01— A-, a u 4127- Ai7 ( 1A
141t6P,40(- I " 11961ir 110
01C;
1 tvc-
A. IA_L P-1 ;ea--7 74---kWie_ eecare-(6)4*'Dvf • cipe ttreDak
2. Have you ever observed a board meeting either in person or on C-View, the City's TV station?
imA-)9/ vi4Es,
3. What background and/or qualifications do you have that you feel would qualify you to serve ongqYY
this Board?
y/6744) vr- y
C t - w 5- T h7-i-.r
rAL e 1,v- ., ` - l ynivv C i
4. Why do you want to serve on this Board?
Name: &CT >e)I
Board Name:
Attachment number 3 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # 19
011-Aug-15 03: 36 PM City of Clearwater O.K. L. S . '/G'/ 6G4UdEl G/b
CITY OF CLEARWATER-APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS
Name: k . l i s _ RAkitc_t/ A)
Home Addres * 0114 Address:
lg 6l
s C zip 37sS-
Zi• J
TeeTelephone: d("1
c C 3 3 Telephone:p
Cell Phone:
t- t — 7 0 2-9 E-mail Address: 1>kl.9 L RC- 14--(12, C1.,1'z
How long a resid
L-(t of Clearwater? 6t3
Occupation: 1 -`e Nl K Employer: ¶ A J L4A Reit 4(1
Field of Education: Other Work Experience: j
doA-0- VS ' ecS C u +i47A 1' ,
If retired, former occupation:
j ,,Q
Community Activities: {,W I ,O- 71--(2-34 2 a ce
Other Interests:_ RT I TT 4_ 11t L c f- .O ,
Board Service (curr and t): Board Preference:
Bg0C-60,0 v (0 S A-P 4- +- .be. (.1 0
Additional Comments: , -\c-` 'E/)s(-11 .-L Q 6, r/
Signe•. iP Date: 4I
See attac ed list for boards that require financial disclosure at time of appointment. Please return
this application and board questionnaire to the Official Records & Legislative Services Department,
P. O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748, or drop off your application at City Hall, 2nd Floor, 112
S. Osceola Avenue.
Note: For boar s rd ai iT.rIna Clearwater residency, this application must be accompanied by a copy of
one of the following:
Current voter registration within city limits
Valid current Florida Drivers' License issued to an address within city limits
a--Deciara on ofIFIrrri cile-flfe-d with'the city clerk affirming residency within-cit p-_ ---- -
AUG ?_ 22011
lCIAL ra.ECORL. AN
LEGISLATI'1' C,k Cn DEP'^.
00ij dno.19 uTT)Iusad Z1I'9 9tt LZL XVd Et:8T NUS TTOZ/TZ/80
Attachment number 4 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # 19
011-Aug-15 03 : 37 PM City of Clearwater U. K.L. S. '/L'f be4Uf3b i/b
BOARD QUESTIONNAIRE
1. What is your and anding of the board's duties and responsibilities?
0 a (A) ( ( 6te e 91A-- CIA-61'6Ai--2
2. Have you ever observed a board meeting either in person or on C-View, the City's TV st-tion?
t a 4" A i bee,e) Gt ! F
OCI---CI &iJ4/L lam/ ..1f II A s .r%
3. What background and/or qualifications do you have that you feel woula qualify you serve on
this Board?
i k 4uQ-- C c,vc kj& c4019,R a s
occ _coce&v,cti .ce_ ce7A-
luecte-
rm,S , HAve -4-0-*Leceete
Ath 4 0 , 0/e 0 A(L&_ a 6 A/ e)Pr(C9S
6eit_) gif /
p/o2Seiw-a5l-- Cgfre.ci2-46) 5 s ilycc3ielina
4. Why o you want to serve Qn this Board?
Tv tp ./eti A d_ belkA 7p(,/- ' I --(7 ,
gam.
De AMP, ip e /0 0 / (6d(
00i-c_e iAittiMILSOA POSC ,-04.0k 7z-- 7162,f .c
P&_ .I.LiN.AL-1A 4( AIll Gz5La , -. i 0,
m
I 2/,I%_
Name:
Board Name:-ame: , , l`-S t
ZOOCJ dnodD uTTtiuUJd Zi69 9Ii LZL XV3 Et:ST AIRS ITOZ/TZ/80
Attachment number 4 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # 19
CITY OF CLEARWATER-APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS
must be Clearwater resident)
Name: Laurie Meggesin
Home Address: Office Address:
1600 Walnut Street
Clearwater, FL Zip 33755 Zip
Telephone: Telephone:
Cell Phone: 727-488-8877 E-mail Address:
How long a resident of Clearwater? Seven years
Occupation: Former attorney; currently studying nonprofit management and doing consulting work
Field of Education: Other Work Experience:
J.D. University of Texas School of Law
Nonprofit Management, University of Shareholder, Baron & Budd, P.C.;
South Florida School of Public Affairs (student) Partner, Rosenthal Pennington LLP
B.A., Creative Writing, Columbia College Other experience includes public participation
consulting, marketing consulting, nonprofit
program management,
English as a Second Language teacher
in Bogota, Colombia and Dallas,Texas)
If retired, former occupation:
Community Activities: Overall Advisory Committee, IFAS/Pinellas County Extension Service; Master
Volunteer, Sustainable Floridians Program; Development Committee, Community Tampa Bay
Other Interests: Fluent Spanish Speaker; community development; environmental sustainability
Board Service (current and past): Board Preference:
Previous): Member, board of directors, Public Art and Design Advisory Board
Womens Advocacy Project and Dallas SER-
Jobs for Progress. Past Board President,Texas Law RECEIVED
Fellowships
FL
Additional Comments:14
p..pp'': M ,
t gyp (/,"
uOSS
Yji ld v.i`'`)
a
ap '
Z.'xn'Wr
r(
b'''-'
Signat a r •i -) Date:`r—Q ) . I
Attachment number 5 \nPage 1 of 4
Item # 19
1
See attached list for boards that require financial disclosure at time of appointment. Please return this
application and board questionnaire to the Official Records & Legislative Services Department, P. O. Box 4748,
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748, or drop off your application at City Hall, 2nd Floor, 112 S. Osceola Avenue.
Note: For boards requiring Clearwater residency, this application must be accompanied by a copy of
one of the following:
Current voter registration within city limits
Valid current Florida Drivers' License issued to an address within city limits
Declaration of Domicile filed with the city clerk affirming residency within city limits
Attachment number 5 \nPage 2 of 4
Item # 19
BOARD QUESTIONNAIRE
1. What is your understanding of the board's duties and responsibilities?
The duties of the board are to assist with the development of guidelines, procedures and policies with
respect to the City's Public Art and Design Program
2. Have you ever observed a board meeting either in person or on C-View, the City's TV station?
City Council meetings
only
3. What background and/or qualifications do you have that you feel would qualify you to serve on
this Board?
I enjoy collecting local art and as a result, have some knowledge of the local arts community. My
document drafting skills from years of legal practice could help with the wordsmithing of policies and
guidelines. I enjoy working collaboratively with diverse stakeholders to achieve common goals and
have done so successfully in a variety of projects and settings.
4. Why do you want to serve on this Board?
I would like to lend my skills to make a positive contribution to our City.
Attachment number 5 \nPage 3 of 4
Item # 19
Name: I Q_„ ,r-n 9 S1 n.
Board Name- b L* G 0,7÷ AV s c,c' 0-3J r c
Attachment number 5 \nPage 4 of 4
Item # 19
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF CLEARWATER -APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS
must be Clearwater resident)
Name:
Home Address: Office Address:
iL5744.__2 _L-)4c4i.\
Zip i'l-- --,, ni...1...4,-,A),trctv, liff___. zip 7 5 _
Telephone: -7-2- 7 -2'7 4-0 qs-7 Telephone: -71:-? - 1.....-c--k - .(-_-)
Cell Phone: -7-72-7-.1,..:"/2-4-0 tE:),--t.,-7 E-mail Address: VA sK/_.C.-.11.1,4'F.„67-1-.Cool\
How long a resident of Clearwater? 'LS '12,All
k rcmOccupation: .:y- it.,‘ ,,,, Employer: m:1,„"-, ,.' 4, .,_, .2. _ Ili '\''
Field of Education: Other Work Experience:
A__ 1,0.--s%.1 ter/v--51.. .:' CA1,..giviNi.w 4--i.\\c =1- b.),
4 GA tic\N\r,,,V,M,...— -ts 2,\* 1._..pv L-,-,. .--1-e_„ ..›.)7.- %kJ-M/1A PA ,
If retired, former occupation:
Community Activities: Cm. Lit-,:%-tixtt, (iv/OA Psz._;3'A)-2, 14A i 1.1.Ah 7 fi' col,e,CA-S7 A tiv4,101.1-?r),Pi)t)
c> -
Other Interests: Avt11, 7,/4t-t v--;..)/ 1,\...n t_A_. Cr"-Ii-4-\1 0 i RA./o\JrztlooLY-m ./C-2))...f71"/40e..TYC'a_\
Board Service(current and past):Board Preference:
b
Additional Comments: '
e ::$,
At..-t.... ct per14,11..-.)44t.L.c._..i .,.1,1 t-,-0/Ai T c:c-1, )4: ivkyr%
thyr CA,i N1\ k- ., Z.N .n\•1,
Signature: sth\t Date:
1
i
See attached list for boaOps that require financial disclosure at time of appointment. Please return this
application and board questionnaire to the Official Records & Legislative Services Department, P. 0. Box 4748,
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748, or drop off your application at City Hall,2nd Floor, 112 S. Osceola Avenue,
Note: For boards requiring Clearwater residency, this application must be accompanied by a copy of
one of the following:
Current voter registration within city limits
Valid current Florida Drivers License issued to an address within city limits
Declaration of Domicile filed with the city clerk affirming residency within city limits
RECEIVED
MAR 1 2 2013
OFFICIAL RECORDS AND
LEGISLATIVE SRVCS DEPT
Attachment number 6 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # 19
Page 2 of 2
BOARD QUESTIONNAIRE
1. What is your understanding of the board's duties and responsibilities?
Covoi-vm`tdr-ci Ci 14,11.1A "rr'fr-VV51 i
IAc ) Crt 0AYN--kfk -
UV,(.. \.7t.,0111-it.S64%sti- Atqa
iskAireces.
2. Have you ever observed a board meeting either in person or on C-View, the City's TV station?
I"t,15
3. What background and/or qualifications do you have that you feel would qualify you to serve on
this Board?
Lcr-i 4U\)itcl 'F'.>15tN
JAL, C---7-LXLVIT"
4. Why do you want to serve on this Board?
Gm)
4_1\ , AN ITVIAAAs1
7
AD k-)"OtAA\AA\J‘1,11t,
Name: \t AiVta b*VVS
Board Name7;\21AL)))ski\.'
Attachment number 6 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # 19
CITY OF CLEARWATER -APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS
Name:
67,
0e- SI /L62
Home Address:Office Address:
a 125-/3 b okir4Jdot CT. 3830 S8 TIf 5rr eT M 'Tk
LcEHRw4re< ) tL Zip .3Y26 / 6_642 id 4rEk L Zip 337 c
Telephone: 7..x'7 77B5 Telephone: 77?7 5 5- &9o?
Cell Phone: 7,?7- 63,5- 0062 E-mail Address: Se.'+ Ie.c-e(c) Pe te-bt-own& ,is
Cow
How long a resident of Clearwater? I ycivs
Occupation: eon/5r40C'Tro,.i /11130167e- Employer: P-To< l?Ra,i)A) Coki571Z1)c..TiOA)
Field of Education: Other Work Experience:
14 EC NAnl l eAc_ en/elr Ale"-- ,, eONSrR x 1-, iU M f}NAe7EK Fck OTtiek
1075 fl`Nd Q bLSiii. C//4-7/At k
If retired, former occupation: 1-00 4A1 A Au AZ.it)& kAc 'kE
Community Activities: A:Mei-27 OF' / 9itir /97<c/tAleL r- 14),(LAN4
ei/v/fc H
Other Interests: ecue- SPz zrs e4/Nis , eecyr 1k(L. RiDz,v4) , Ai Fars/
Board Service (current and past): Board Preference:
RFCRVED
Additional Comments: MAR 18 2013
O F1CiAL ECORDS AN
LA FiVES ACS DE '
Signature: 7-i
Date: 3' 1 /3
L
See attached list for boards that require financial disclosure at time of appointment. Please return this
application and board questionnaire to the Official Records & Legislative Services Department, P. 0. Box 4748,
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748, or drop off your application at City Hall, 2nd Floor, 112 S. Osceola Avenue.
Note: For boards requiring Clearwater residency, this application must be accompanied by a copy of
one of the following:
Current voter registration within city limits
Valid current Florida Drivers' License issued to an address within city limits
Declaration of Domicile filed with the city clerk affirming residency within city limits
Attachment number 7 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # 19
BOARD QUESTIONNAIRE
1. What is your understanding of the board's duties and responsibilities?
H6.S 7Z 9 s Pieoce .+;ES ,7„;;g JsrE
ogu c- leigls 12,2064w" ) 14-0 S" t 9s A gvsQqa /yJr
r a eve AN ,4Aoll?a' t /i.OLE" /tie e ,re 76 "0.50 Pafivi
fir ffeo6.W'1
2. Have you ever observed a board meeting either in person or on C-View, the City's TV station?
A 6) vi=P I/74 /oed gerae,>'c, Avp 4V
Pt---WA/.44c7 4w I AA-77Pa ?aged, r oAk) P/cerbv6s
3. What background and/or qualifications do you have that you feel would qualify you to serve on
this Board?
RS AN 6vhr sie 4AP, f- e,vs e t' cu73u rvA/PE D
C.D0IS7xu` ro 1 ?4. 1edc ? S )9PO Ti u I t /"57-41-4.L47io.,) OF `Pv8u,_ 1441
ffA44r 4 Ury/Q 6 5,0 L c_ S c"T mar (®v6A
ee en/eu/gtee____ (R)3c_i 44Ts ra.vi t"-i.
4. Why do you want to serve on this Board?
Y UJ'h AND Xi/nay 1441x£ 4 y o F Soepacri.0 4 4Rt/S7-s
N fuggy 6 /fikl D W 01)1.4) A t At 1`i9 C,e_r THE/.e P4S5/0 c,1
7-1:/ 'Y / c i s c) o me ) i w4/cfl T/tr (zWew ee Pveo
Name: Cx/4_ 5 ez-
Board Name: Pogue- 41.:r 14D 7
Attachment number 7 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # 19
I
CITY OF CLEARWATER - APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS
Name: Mr. Neale A.Stralow
Home Address: Office Address:
2257 Bascom Way 2205 N.20th Street
Clearwater,Florida Zip 33764 Tampa,Florida Zip 33605
Telephone: 727.669.5554 Telephone: 813.223.9500,ext 355
Cell Phone:813.220.3237 E-mail Address: neale.stralow @stantec.com
How long a resident of Clearwater? In Pinellas County since 1988,Clearwater Area since 1992,and within City limits since 1998.
Occupation: Urban Planner/Landscape Architect Employer: Stantec Consulting Services,Inc.
Field of Education:Other Work Experience:
Bachelors of Landscape Architecture-University of Illinois Florida Registered Landscape Architect-LA0001639
American Institute of Certified Planners-#114358
If retired, former occupation: 12 Years Professional Experience with Hillsborough County Planning
Community Activities: Clearwater High School CAICC Advisory Board;Clearwater Chargers Soccer Club Travel Rec Coach(6 seasons);
Clearwater Little League former Board Member and Coach
Other Interests: Photography,Cultural Arts,Golf
Board Service (current and past): Board Preference:
Hillsborough County MPO's Livable Roadways,ASLA Alternate Public Art&Design Advisory Board
Hillsborough County Historic Preservation,Staff Representative
FDOT Tampa Interstate Design Guidelines,HC Representative
Additional Comments:
C"-------4C; ;;ISigned: Date: March 20,2013
See attached list for boards that require financial disclosure at time of appointment. Please return
this application and board questionnaire to the Official Records & Legislative Services Department, P.
O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748, or drop off your application at City Hall, 2nd Floor, 112 S.
Osceola Avenue.
Note: For boards reguiring Clearwater residency, this application must be accompanied by a copy of
one of the following:
Current voter registration within city limits
Valid current Florida Drivers' License issued to an address within city limits RECE ED
Declaration of Domicile filed with the city clerk affirming residency within city limits
MAR 2 0 2013
OFFICIAL RECORDS ANC)
LEGISLATIVE SRVCS DEFT
Attachment number 8 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # 19
BOARD QUESTIONNAIRE
1. What is your understanding of the board's duties and responsibilities?
My understanding of the Public Art&Design Advisory Board is to develop guidelines,procedures and policies that help to administer
the City's public art program and through cooperative discussion support and recommend public art to the City Council.
2. Have you ever observed a board meeting either in person or on C-View, the City's TV station?
I have observed and participated within many public board meetings and hearings,however none in relationship to this board.
3. What background and/or qualifications do you have that you feel would qualify you to serve on
this Board?
I believe that the combination of my 26 years of professional experience as a Registered Landscape Architect and Urban Planner including
12 years in senior planning positions with a local government,and remainder as a private consultant in national A/E/P firms provides me
a solid understanding of the implicit needs of this board. Public art and design installations touches the very core of personal preference.
Supporting cultural expression is critically important in any civilization. To ensure continued public support it is important to establish and
implement defensible recommendations. I have served boards,designed projects including public art,and written and enforced regulations.
4. Why do you want to serve on this Board?
I am keenly aware that community organizations and appointed boards have been affected by the economic recession. As a resident with
two children I have often served organizations associated with their interests. Appointment to this board may fulfill my personal need to
support public realm improvement in our community. I believe that insights gleaned from my 26 years of professional development will
help in the planning,design,and implementation of public realm enhancement in the City.
Name: Neale A.Stralow, RLA,AICP
Board Name: Public Art&Design Advisory Board
Attachment number 8 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # 19
CITY OF CLEARWATER - APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS
must be Clearwater resident)
Name:Howard Warshauer
Home Address: Office Address:
808 Allen dr
Clearwater, FL Zip 33764 Zip
Telephone: 727 442 7411 Telephone:
Cell Phone: 727 776 7932 E-mail Address:
How long a resident of Clearwater? 9 years
Occupation: Farmers Market Manager Employer: Intercultural Advocacy Institute
Field of Education: Other Work Experience:
Mathematics Teacher Finance, City Commissioner, Business
Consultant
If retired, former occupation:
Community Activities: Clearwater Downtown Partnership, Volunteer, 4th Friday
Other Interests:
Board Service (current and past): Board Preference:
Public Art and Design Board Public Art and Design Board
Charter Review Board - twice
Additional Comments:
Signature: HOWARD WARSHAUER Date:January 27, 2013
See attached list for boards that require financial disclosure at time of appointment. Please return this
application and board questionnaire to the Official Records & Legislative Services Department, P. O. Box 4748,
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748, or drop off your application at City Hall, 2nd Floor, 112 S. Osceola Avenue.
Note: For boards requiring Clearwater residency, this application must be accompanied by a copy of
one of the following:
Current voter registration within city limits EC '
Valid current Florida Drivers' License issued to an address within city limits
Declaration of Domicile filed with the city clerk affirming residency within city limit ' 2 8 2813
OFFICIAL RECORDS
LEGISLATIVE SRVCS DEFT'
Attachment number 9 \nPage 1 of 3
Item # 19
BOARD QUESTIONNAIRE
1. What is your understanding of the board's duties and responsibilities?
We decide upon public space art projects that are funded by a set aside percentage of new
construction project budgets. We also oversee distribution of funds that are set aside by projects that
decide to give cash instead of creating public art.
2. Have you ever observed a board meeting either in person or on C-View, the City's TV station?
Yes
3. What background and/or qualifications do you have that you feel would qualify you to serve on
this Board?
I have served on this board since its inception.
4. Why do you want to serve on this Board?
It allows me to give back to the city in which I live.
Name: Howard Warshauer
Board Name: Clearwater Art and Design Board
Attachment number 9 \nPage 2 of 3
Item # 19
LaCosse, Judith
To: Howard Warshauer
Subject:RE: Public Art and Design Board
From: Howard Warshauer jmailto:captainhw@gmail.coml
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 3:51 PM
To: LaCosse, Judith
Subject: Re: Public Art and Design Board
I have attached the document you requested.
Howard Warshauer
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:08 AM, <Judith.LaCosse @myclearwater.com> wrote:
Mr. Warshauer,
You're currently finishing your 2nd term on the above board that will be expiring on March 3151 this year.
If you wish to be considered for another term, we need a more current application along with a questionnaire for our files.
Please complete & sign the attached forms and return to my attention when you get a chance.
An appointment agenda item will be going to the first council meeting in March.
Thank You.
Judith LaCosse
Staff Assistant
Official Records and
Legislative Services Dept.
727-562-4093
1
Attachment number 9 \nPage 3 of 3
Item # 19
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the 2013 Federal Legislative Package.
SUMMARY:
Review Approval:1) Clerk
Cover Memo
Item # 20
City of Clearwater
2013 Federal Legislative
City of Clearwater, Florida
Federal Legislative Agenda
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 27
Item # 20
Prepar
Mayor George Cretekos
Councilmember Doreen Hock-
Questions regarding the information
Greg Burns
(202) 737-8162
Copyright 201
Prepared by Van Scoyoc Associates for
Clearwater City Council
George Cretekos Vice Mayor Paul Gibson
-DiPolito Councilmember Bill Jonson
Councilmember Jay Polglaze
Bill Horne, City Manager
Questions regarding the information in this book may be directed
Rosemarie Call
(727) 562-4092
March 2013
Copyright 2013 Van Scoyoc Associates Inc.
Gibson
uncilmember Bill Jonson
in this book may be directed to:
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 27
Item # 20
Water Resources
1) Stevenson Creek Estuary Restoration Project
2) Clearwater Inlet Maintenance Dredging; Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund
Transportation
3) Transportation Authorization
4) Alternative Fuel Tax Incentives
Public Safety
5) Public Safety Programs
6) The Corporation for National and Community Service
Grant Program
7) Prescription Drug Abuse
Local Government Finance
8) Tax-Exempt Bonds
9) Sales-Tax Legislation
10) Transient Occupancy Taxes
Economic Development & Social Services
11) Economic Development Administration
12) Department of Housing and Urban Development
13) Supportive Housing for the Elderly
Housing and Urban Development’s
14) Homeless Assistance – Continuum
Energy & Environment
15) Offshore Energy Exploration
16) Environmental Protection Agency
17) Land and Water Conservation Fund
General Government Issues
18) Public Pension Reform
19) National Flood Insurance Program
Stevenson Creek Estuary Restoration Project
Inlet Maintenance Dredging; Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund
Transportation Authorization
Alternative Fuel Tax Incentives
National and Community Service – AmeriCorps’ State and National
Local Government Finance
Transient Occupancy Taxes
Economic Development & Social Services
Administration
Department of Housing and Urban Development Formula Programs
Supportive Housing for the Elderly and for Persons with Disabilities - Department of
Housing and Urban Development’s Section 202 and 811 Programs
Continuum of Care Program
Offshore Energy Exploration
Environmental Protection Agency’s Brownfields Program
Land and Water Conservation Fund
General Government Issues
National Flood Insurance Program
Inlet Maintenance Dredging; Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund
AmeriCorps’ State and National
Department of
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3 of 27
Item # 20
201
Stevenson Creek Estuary Restoration Project
Support continued Corps participation in the Ste
the City of Clearwater. Support continued Federal participation
Continuing Authorities Programs, particularly Section 20
Section 206 project from $5 million to at least $10 million.
Clearwater Inlet Maintenance Dredging; Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund
Support adequate annual funding for the Corps of Engineers Operations & Maintenance account,
including additional funding for dredging not identified in the
funding specifically provided for “Small, Remote, or Subsistence Navigation” dredging activities.
Support legislation which would require the expenditure of funds for O&M activities equal to the level of
receipts plus interest credited to the HMTF for tha
Alternative Fuels Tax Incentives
Support the extension of a $0.50 per gallon equivalent tax incentive for natural gas when used as a motor
fuel.
Transportation Authorization
Monitor proposed changes to Federal highway and transit programs.
transportation revenue streams. Support
Clearwater priorities via this legislation or other means.
Public Safety Funding
Support adequate annual funding for a wi
grants, e.g., Community Oriented Policing Services, Byrne Justice Assistance Grants, Emergency
Management Performance Grants, Assistance to Firefighters Grants, and Staffing for Adequate Fire and
Emergency Response Grants. Support
The Corporation for National and Community Service
Program
Support continued annual funding for grant programs within the
Community Service, particularly for the AmeriCorps State and National grant program.
Prescription Drug Abuse
Support the Safe Prescribing Act and other
abuse.
Tax-Exempt Bonds
Oppose legislation that would threaten the tax exe
cap on tax-exempt municipal bonds.
Sales-Tax Legislation
Support legislation that requires companies making catalog and internet sal
associated taxes to local authorities.
City of Clearwater
2013 Federal Legislative Agenda
Stevenson Creek Estuary Restoration Project
continued Corps participation in the Stevenson Creek Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration
continued Federal participation in, and funding of, Corps of Engineers’
Continuing Authorities Programs, particularly Section 206. Support an increased authorization level for a
million to at least $10 million.
Inlet Maintenance Dredging; Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund
adequate annual funding for the Corps of Engineers Operations & Maintenance account,
including additional funding for dredging not identified in the President’s budget. Support
funding specifically provided for “Small, Remote, or Subsistence Navigation” dredging activities.
which would require the expenditure of funds for O&M activities equal to the level of
receipts plus interest credited to the HMTF for that fiscal year.
the extension of a $0.50 per gallon equivalent tax incentive for natural gas when used as a motor
proposed changes to Federal highway and transit programs. Monitor efforts to enhance Federal
Support any and all opportunities to secure funding for
priorities via this legislation or other means.
funding for a wide variety of Departments of Justice and Homeland Security
grants, e.g., Community Oriented Policing Services, Byrne Justice Assistance Grants, Emergency
Management Performance Grants, Assistance to Firefighters Grants, and Staffing for Adequate Fire and
Support the City of Clearwater’s applications for these funds
The Corporation for National and Community Service – AmeriCorps’ State and National Grant
funding for grant programs within the Corporation for National and
, particularly for the AmeriCorps State and National grant program.
he Safe Prescribing Act and other legislation or initiatives that aim to reduce prescription drug
threaten the tax exemption on state and local bonds, including a 28 percent
exempt municipal bonds.
legislation that requires companies making catalog and internet sales to collect and remit the
.
Restoration Project in
in, and funding of, Corps of Engineers’
an increased authorization level for a
adequate annual funding for the Corps of Engineers Operations & Maintenance account,
Support additional
funding specifically provided for “Small, Remote, or Subsistence Navigation” dredging activities.
which would require the expenditure of funds for O&M activities equal to the level of
the extension of a $0.50 per gallon equivalent tax incentive for natural gas when used as a motor
efforts to enhance Federal
any and all opportunities to secure funding for City of
of Justice and Homeland Security
grants, e.g., Community Oriented Policing Services, Byrne Justice Assistance Grants, Emergency
Management Performance Grants, Assistance to Firefighters Grants, and Staffing for Adequate Fire and
Clearwater’s applications for these funds.
State and National Grant
oration for National and
, particularly for the AmeriCorps State and National grant program.
reduce prescription drug
mption on state and local bonds, including a 28 percent
es to collect and remit the
Attachment number 1 \nPage 4 of 27
Item # 20
Transient Occupancy Taxes
Oppose legislation that would exempt Internet travel brokers from paying taxes on the full room rate paid
by the consumer, thereby costing Pinellas
Economic Development Administration
Support continued funding of the Econ
grant applications through the program.
Department of Housing and Urban
Support adequate funding for future fiscal years
the HOME Investment Partnerships p
support those that are least fortunate.
Supportive Housing for the Elderly and for Persons with Disabilities
Urban Development’s Section 202 and 811 Programs
Support continued adequate annual Federal funding of the Department o
Development’s Supportive Housing for the Elderly Program
Persons with Disabilities Program (Section 811).
Homeless Assistance – Continuum of Care Program
Support continued adequate annual fundi
Homeless Assistance Grants, particularly for the Continuum of Care Program.
Offshore Energy Exploration
Monitor the potential expansion of offshore energy exploration in Florida’s Federal waters.
Environmental Protection Agency’s Brownfields Program
Support adequate annual funding for the Environmental Protection Agency
including at least $90 million for the Section 104(k) competitive grant program.
reauthorize the Environmental Protection Agency’s brownfields program.
Land and Water Conservation Fund
Support a $900 million annual appropriation from the Land and Water Conservation Fund, including at
least $100 million for the state grant program.
Public Pension Reform
Monitor federal legislative proposals related to public pensions, e.g., the Public Employee Pension
Transparency Act, which could significantly impact the
National Flood Insurance Program
Monitor FEMA’s implementation of the reauthorization of the National Flood Insurance Program.
Monitor changes to flood insurance rates for homeowners and businesses in the City of Clearwater.
legislation that would exempt Internet travel brokers from paying taxes on the full room rate paid
Pinellas County the opportunity to collect significant tourist revenue
Economic Development Administration
continued funding of the Economic Development Administration. Support City of Clearwater
through the program.
using and Urban Development Formula Programs
for future fiscal years for both the Community Development Block Grants and
the HOME Investment Partnerships programs because of their critical role in the City’s
support those that are least fortunate.
Supportive Housing for the Elderly and for Persons with Disabilities - Department of Housing and
Urban Development’s Section 202 and 811 Programs
d adequate annual Federal funding of the Department of Housing and Urban
Supportive Housing for the Elderly Program (Section 202), and Supportive Housing for
Persons with Disabilities Program (Section 811).
Continuum of Care Program
continued adequate annual funding for Department of Housing and Urban Development
Homeless Assistance Grants, particularly for the Continuum of Care Program.
the potential expansion of offshore energy exploration in Florida’s Federal waters.
Environmental Protection Agency’s Brownfields Program
funding for the Environmental Protection Agency’s brownfields program,
including at least $90 million for the Section 104(k) competitive grant program. Support
authorize the Environmental Protection Agency’s brownfields program.
Land and Water Conservation Fund
a $900 million annual appropriation from the Land and Water Conservation Fund, including at
least $100 million for the state grant program.
federal legislative proposals related to public pensions, e.g., the Public Employee Pension
Transparency Act, which could significantly impact the Clearwater Employees Pension Fund
National Flood Insurance Program
MA’s implementation of the reauthorization of the National Flood Insurance Program.
changes to flood insurance rates for homeowners and businesses in the City of Clearwater.
legislation that would exempt Internet travel brokers from paying taxes on the full room rate paid
significant tourist revenue.
City of Clearwater
Community Development Block Grants and
overall efforts to
Department of Housing and
f Housing and Urban
(Section 202), and Supportive Housing for
ng for Department of Housing and Urban Development
the potential expansion of offshore energy exploration in Florida’s Federal waters.
rownfields program,
Support legislation to
a $900 million annual appropriation from the Land and Water Conservation Fund, including at
federal legislative proposals related to public pensions, e.g., the Public Employee Pension
Clearwater Employees Pension Fund.
MA’s implementation of the reauthorization of the National Flood Insurance Program.
changes to flood insurance rates for homeowners and businesses in the City of Clearwater.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 5 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Stevenson Creek Estuary
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with standing authorization, known as the Continuing Authorities
Programs (CAP), to respond to a variety of water resource probl
congressional authorization or funding for each project. In theory, this decreases the amount of time
required to budget, develop, and approve potential projects for construction.
The CAP Section 206 program authoriz
restoration and protection projects in partnership with non
dictates that the maximum Federal cost for planning, design, and construction of any one project
million. Each project must be economically justified, environmentally sound, and technically feasible.
The City and the Corps of Engineers have been engaged on
Creek Estuary Restoration, since 1999.
dredge and remove polluted material from Stevenson Cre
feeds into Clearwater Harbor.
The construction phase of the project began in August of 2009, but
performance issues with the first and second firms
material. These issues resulted in the
increased project costs to the point that
$5,000,000 cost limit. The City has contributed
100 percent of project overruns, an additional $571,091,
40 percent. To date, the project is only 20 percent complete.
At the end of the 112th Congress, and again, in the 113
Chairwoman of the Senate Committee on
Resources Development Act (WRDA
$5 million to $10 million. Senate Democratic and Republican leadership have indicated that bringing
WRDA to the floor is a priority. The
Committee, Rep. Bill Shuster (R-PA)
to address during the 113th Congress.
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Support
Restoration Project in the City of Clearwater.
Corps of Engineers’ Continuing Authorities Programs, particularly Section 20
authorization of the Water Resources Development Act, with
million to at least $10 million for Section 206 projects
NOTES:
Page 1
Stevenson Creek Estuary Restoration Project
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: Congress provides the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with standing authorization, known as the Continuing Authorities
Programs (CAP), to respond to a variety of water resource problems without the need to seek specific
congressional authorization or funding for each project. In theory, this decreases the amount of time
required to budget, develop, and approve potential projects for construction.
program authorizes the Corps of Engineers to engage in aquatic ecosystem
in partnership with non-Federal government agencies. Current law
dictates that the maximum Federal cost for planning, design, and construction of any one project
Each project must be economically justified, environmentally sound, and technically feasible.
The City and the Corps of Engineers have been engaged on a Section 206 CAP project, the Stevenson
since 1999. This objective of the Stevenson Creek Estuary Project is
and remove polluted material from Stevenson Creek to improve the health of the
The construction phase of the project began in August of 2009, but has encountered major delays due to
issues with the first and second firms selected to dredge the creek and remove the polluted
. These issues resulted in the termination of these previously awarded contracts
costs to the point that the Corps’ Federal expenditures have reached their authorized
The City has contributed a $2,692,308 cost share to the project, and
100 percent of project overruns, an additional $571,091, thereby increasing the City’s overall
To date, the project is only 20 percent complete.
, and again, in the 113th Congress, Senator Barbara Boxer (D
Chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (EPW), released
WRDA) that proposes raising the per project CAP Section 206 limit
Senate Democratic and Republican leadership have indicated that bringing
The new Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure
PA), has also indicated that WRDA is a priority the committee intends
Congress.
Support continued Corps participation in the Stevenson Creek
in the City of Clearwater. Support continued Federal participation in, and funding of
Corps of Engineers’ Continuing Authorities Programs, particularly Section 206. Support
authorization of the Water Resources Development Act, with an increased authorization l
for Section 206 projects.
: Congress provides the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with standing authorization, known as the Continuing Authorities
ems without the need to seek specific
congressional authorization or funding for each project. In theory, this decreases the amount of time
engage in aquatic ecosystem
Federal government agencies. Current law
dictates that the maximum Federal cost for planning, design, and construction of any one project is $5
Each project must be economically justified, environmentally sound, and technically feasible.
a Section 206 CAP project, the Stevenson
Estuary Project is to
ek to improve the health of the waterway which
encountered major delays due to
to dredge the creek and remove the polluted
contracts and have
expenditures have reached their authorized
t, and has provided
overall cost share to
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), the
released a Water
Section 206 limit from
Senate Democratic and Republican leadership have indicated that bringing
hairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure
ommittee intends
enson Creek Estuary
continued Federal participation in, and funding of,
Support a new
an increased authorization limit from $5
Attachment number 1 \nPage 6 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Clearwater Inlet Maintenance Dredging
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
channel, the Army Corps of Engineers are supposed to be 100 percent responsible for the cost of
maintenance dredging of Clearwater Pass. The Clearwater pass requires maintenance dredging about
every 5 years due to shoaling, which
fishermen, charter boats, and other recreational vessels
constraints, this only occurs about eve
Clearwater Pass was last dredged and fully paid fo
2012, but the City of Clearwater paid the entire
Corps may have funding available to complete the dredging
City for about a third of the cost of that dred
The dredging project has a double benefit, as the sand that is removed is then used to renourish North
Clearwater Beach.
To fund dredging projects that are not generally budgeted for b
competition for funds from the Army Corps of Engineers, Congress has adjusted their funding strategy in
the age of no-earmarks to add additional funding for what Congress terms “Additional Funding for
Ongoing Work.” Among these amounts, Congress in Fiscal Year
additional funding to the Corps for “Small, Remote, or Subsistence Navigation” operations &
maintenance (O&M) activity. This will likely be the funding from which the
compete in the future to maintain the channel.
or Subsistence Navigation” will be limited to $28.5 million.
On another front, in an effort to alleviate the annual shortage of
the United States, some have advocated that disbursements from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund
(HMTF) be increased dramatically. The Harbor Maintenance Tax, which funds the HMTF, is levied on
importers and domestic shippers using coastal or Great Lakes ports and is assessed at a rate of $1.25 per
$1,000 in cargo value. When O&M funding is provided for a Corps dredging project, it comes from the
HMTF.
At the end of 2012, the HMTF has a balance of more than $
over $100 million alone in recent fiscal years. However, because the HMTF is not a separate, or “off
budget,” account within the Federal budget, the “surplus” in the HMTF has in effect already been spent
elsewhere on other general government activities.
Expenditures by Congress out of the HMTF to pay for routine O&M expenses have remained relatively
stagnant for decades. In essence, Congress has decided to provide less funding for Corps O&M activities
than would be provided if there were a legislative mandate to spend all funding provided annually via the
HMTF. Over the past 15 years, HMTF expenditures by Congress have consistently been less than the
collections and interest into the HMTF. The difference between what
fluctuated, from a low of roughly $50 million in Fiscal Year 2002 to a high of roughly $500 million in
Fiscal Year 2009.
Page 2
Inlet Maintenance Dredging; Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: As a Federal navigation
channel, the Army Corps of Engineers are supposed to be 100 percent responsible for the cost of
Clearwater Pass. The Clearwater pass requires maintenance dredging about
, which cuts off an important navigation channel for local commercial
and other recreational vessels. However, due to City and Corps budget
constraints, this only occurs about every 10 years.
dredged and fully paid for by the Corps in 2001. The Pass was again dredged i
paid the entire $750,000 cost of the project, as it was uncertain
may have funding available to complete the dredging. Eventually, the Corps did reimbur
for about a third of the cost of that dredging operation.
The dredging project has a double benefit, as the sand that is removed is then used to renourish North
To fund dredging projects that are not generally budgeted for by the Administration due to the difficult
competition for funds from the Army Corps of Engineers, Congress has adjusted their funding strategy in
earmarks to add additional funding for what Congress terms “Additional Funding for
” Among these amounts, Congress in Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 provided $30 million in
additional funding to the Corps for “Small, Remote, or Subsistence Navigation” operations &
maintenance (O&M) activity. This will likely be the funding from which the Clearwater Pass
compete in the future to maintain the channel. After sequestration, FY 2013 funding for “Small, Remote,
or Subsistence Navigation” will be limited to $28.5 million.
On another front, in an effort to alleviate the annual shortage of funding for O&M activities throughout
the United States, some have advocated that disbursements from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund
(HMTF) be increased dramatically. The Harbor Maintenance Tax, which funds the HMTF, is levied on
shippers using coastal or Great Lakes ports and is assessed at a rate of $1.25 per
$1,000 in cargo value. When O&M funding is provided for a Corps dredging project, it comes from the
a balance of more than $7 billion. Interest on collections has been
over $100 million alone in recent fiscal years. However, because the HMTF is not a separate, or “off
budget,” account within the Federal budget, the “surplus” in the HMTF has in effect already been spent
ther general government activities.
Expenditures by Congress out of the HMTF to pay for routine O&M expenses have remained relatively
stagnant for decades. In essence, Congress has decided to provide less funding for Corps O&M activities
ovided if there were a legislative mandate to spend all funding provided annually via the
HMTF. Over the past 15 years, HMTF expenditures by Congress have consistently been less than the
collections and interest into the HMTF. The difference between what is collected and what is spent has
fluctuated, from a low of roughly $50 million in Fiscal Year 2002 to a high of roughly $500 million in
; Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund
Federal navigation
channel, the Army Corps of Engineers are supposed to be 100 percent responsible for the cost of
Clearwater Pass. The Clearwater pass requires maintenance dredging about
ff an important navigation channel for local commercial
. However, due to City and Corps budget
was again dredged in
uncertain when the
, the Corps did reimburse the
The dredging project has a double benefit, as the sand that is removed is then used to renourish North
y the Administration due to the difficult
competition for funds from the Army Corps of Engineers, Congress has adjusted their funding strategy in
earmarks to add additional funding for what Congress terms “Additional Funding for
2012 provided $30 million in
additional funding to the Corps for “Small, Remote, or Subsistence Navigation” operations &
Clearwater Pass must
After sequestration, FY 2013 funding for “Small, Remote,
funding for O&M activities throughout
the United States, some have advocated that disbursements from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund
(HMTF) be increased dramatically. The Harbor Maintenance Tax, which funds the HMTF, is levied on
shippers using coastal or Great Lakes ports and is assessed at a rate of $1.25 per
$1,000 in cargo value. When O&M funding is provided for a Corps dredging project, it comes from the
n. Interest on collections has been
over $100 million alone in recent fiscal years. However, because the HMTF is not a separate, or “off-
budget,” account within the Federal budget, the “surplus” in the HMTF has in effect already been spent
Expenditures by Congress out of the HMTF to pay for routine O&M expenses have remained relatively
stagnant for decades. In essence, Congress has decided to provide less funding for Corps O&M activities
ovided if there were a legislative mandate to spend all funding provided annually via the
HMTF. Over the past 15 years, HMTF expenditures by Congress have consistently been less than the
is collected and what is spent has
fluctuated, from a low of roughly $50 million in Fiscal Year 2002 to a high of roughly $500 million in
Attachment number 1 \nPage 7 of 27
Item # 20
To rectify this situation, some in Congress have called for increasing disbursements from the t
In the 112th Congress, legislation was
expenditure of funds for O&M activities equal to the level of receipts plus interest credited to the HMTF
for that fiscal year. This type of legis
Development Act.
In the 113th Congress, this legislation has been reintroduced in the House of Representatives and the
Senate. The House bill currently has 92 cosponsors,
Nelson and Rubio have once again signed on as cosponsors with 32 of his colleagues.
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Support
& Maintenance account, including additional fund
Administration budget. Support additional funding specifically provided for “Small, Remote, or
Subsistence Navigation” dredging activities.
the expenditure of funds for O&M activities equal to the level of receipts plus interest credited to the
HMTF for that fiscal year.
NOTES:
Page 3
To rectify this situation, some in Congress have called for increasing disbursements from the t
was introduced in the House and Senate that would require the
expenditure of funds for O&M activities equal to the level of receipts plus interest credited to the HMTF
for that fiscal year. This type of legislation is ideally suited for inclusion in a Water Resources
Congress, this legislation has been reintroduced in the House of Representatives and the
Senate. The House bill currently has 92 cosponsors, including 8 from Florida. In the Senate, Senators
Nelson and Rubio have once again signed on as cosponsors with 32 of his colleagues.
Support adequate annual funding for the Corps of Engineers Operations
& Maintenance account, including additional funding for dredging not identified in the annual
additional funding specifically provided for “Small, Remote, or
Subsistence Navigation” dredging activities. Support H.R. 335 and S. 218, both of which would require
ture of funds for O&M activities equal to the level of receipts plus interest credited to the
To rectify this situation, some in Congress have called for increasing disbursements from the trust fund.
would require the
expenditure of funds for O&M activities equal to the level of receipts plus interest credited to the HMTF
lation is ideally suited for inclusion in a Water Resources
Congress, this legislation has been reintroduced in the House of Representatives and the
In the Senate, Senators
adequate annual funding for the Corps of Engineers Operations
ing for dredging not identified in the annual
additional funding specifically provided for “Small, Remote, or
, both of which would require
ture of funds for O&M activities equal to the level of receipts plus interest credited to the
Attachment number 1 \nPage 8 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Transportation Authorization
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
short-term authorizations, Congress passed and the President signed the
the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) on July 6, 2012. MAP
at roughly the levels of the previous authorization ($48 billion) through September 30, 2014, which
means that Congress will need to begin to craft the follow
of the 113th Congress.
MAP-21 eliminated, consolidated, or changed
transportation grant programs into formula programs, and left much discretion to state Departments of
Transportation on how to allocate funding
One of those changes was the removal of de
to School, Recreational Trails, and the Transportation Enhancements program. The legislation instead
created a new program called Transportation Alternatives (TA). Under this consolidated progra
funding for these activities will be reduced by approximately $300 million annually from current levels of
funding. Fifty percent of Florida’s estimated $
within the state based on population, a
200,000 will be given project selection authority ov
City of Clearwater will go through the
In developing MAP-21, Congress did not address the need for a long
nation’s transportation infrastructure. Fuel taxes, which currently provide most of the money for surface
transportation, do not provide a solid long
growth, even if Congress were to authorize a modest increase
sources of income for an expanded program, or alternately, to settle for a smaller
very different than the one currently in place. Less Federal funding via a future transportation
reauthorization bill would mean significantly less funding available to
and ultimately the City of Clearwater
programs.
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Monitor
Monitor efforts to enhance Federal transportation revenue streams.
secure funding for the City of Clearwater’s
NOTES:
Page 4
: Transportation Authorization
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: After several years of
term authorizations, Congress passed and the President signed the Moving Ahead for Progress in
n July 6, 2012. MAP-21 funds Federal surface transportation programs
revious authorization ($48 billion) through September 30, 2014, which
means that Congress will need to begin to craft the follow-on legislation to MAP-21 well before the end
, or changed many programs, transformed nearly all discretionary
transportation grant programs into formula programs, and left much discretion to state Departments of
Transportation on how to allocate funding among the remaining programs.
the removal of dedicated funding for several programs, including Safe Routes
to School, Recreational Trails, and the Transportation Enhancements program. The legislation instead
created a new program called Transportation Alternatives (TA). Under this consolidated progra
funding for these activities will be reduced by approximately $300 million annually from current levels of
funding. Fifty percent of Florida’s estimated $49 million TA allocation for FY 2013 will be sub
within the state based on population, and census-designated urbanized areas with populations above
200,000 will be given project selection authority over its portion of these funds. Funding
the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organizati
21, Congress did not address the need for a long-term, sustainable plan to finance our
nation’s transportation infrastructure. Fuel taxes, which currently provide most of the money for surface
a solid long-term foundation for generally desired transportation funding
authorize a modest increase. The choice then becomes finding new
sources of income for an expanded program, or alternately, to settle for a smaller program that might look
very different than the one currently in place. Less Federal funding via a future transportation
reauthorization bill would mean significantly less funding available to FDOT, the Pinellas County MPO,
Clearwater, to support both surface transportation and transit projects and
Monitor proposed changes to Federal highway and transit programs.
efforts to enhance Federal transportation revenue streams. Support any and all opportunities to
the City of Clearwater’s priorities via this legislation or other means.
After several years of
Moving Ahead for Progress in
21 funds Federal surface transportation programs
revious authorization ($48 billion) through September 30, 2014, which
21 well before the end
transformed nearly all discretionary
transportation grant programs into formula programs, and left much discretion to state Departments of
dicated funding for several programs, including Safe Routes
to School, Recreational Trails, and the Transportation Enhancements program. The legislation instead
created a new program called Transportation Alternatives (TA). Under this consolidated program,
funding for these activities will be reduced by approximately $300 million annually from current levels of
TA allocation for FY 2013 will be sub-allocated
designated urbanized areas with populations above
unding available to the
Planning Organization (MPO).
term, sustainable plan to finance our
nation’s transportation infrastructure. Fuel taxes, which currently provide most of the money for surface
term foundation for generally desired transportation funding
. The choice then becomes finding new
program that might look
very different than the one currently in place. Less Federal funding via a future transportation
the Pinellas County MPO,
, to support both surface transportation and transit projects and
proposed changes to Federal highway and transit programs.
y and all opportunities to
priorities via this legislation or other means.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 9 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Alternative Fuel Tax Incentives
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
authorization bill known as SAFETEA
vehicle fuel. The $0.50 per gallon equivalent incentive is provided to businesses, individuals, and tax
exempt entities that sell the fuel and essentially becomes a rebate. The $0.50 incentive originally expired
at the end of Fiscal Year 2009, but has since been extended three times to the end of calendar year 2013,
most recently as part of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012
In the fall of 2011, the City of Clearwater opened
Bay area, and takes advantage of this tax incentive
provided to the City is estimated to be $75,000
years.
There remains an underlying feeling among some in Congress that the free
fuels, etc. we use to power the nation and that the Federal government should not in essence pick winners
and losers via tax policy. An example of this is was legislation introduced in the 112
Pompeo (R-KS) that would have terminated all energy incentives.
In another example, Rep. John Sullivan (
Americans Solutions Act in 2011. Senator Robert Menendez (
the Senate. The Sullivan-Menendez
natural gas, including extending the natural gas fuel tax incentive. During the 112
retained bipartisan support in the House with over 180 cosponsors
very unusual step to remove their names as co
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Support
natural gas when used as a motor fuel.
NOTES:
Page 5
Alternative Fuel Tax Incentives
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: An older
authorization bill known as SAFETEA-LU provided a tax incentive for natural gas when used as a motor
per gallon equivalent incentive is provided to businesses, individuals, and tax
and essentially becomes a rebate. The $0.50 incentive originally expired
at the end of Fiscal Year 2009, but has since been extended three times to the end of calendar year 2013,
American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, albeit partially retroactively.
Clearwater opened the first public natural gas filling station in the Tampa
takes advantage of this tax incentive with every gallon of gas sold. For 2012, t
estimated to be $75,000 and is expected to grow significantly over the
There remains an underlying feeling among some in Congress that the free-market should determine what
the nation and that the Federal government should not in essence pick winners
and losers via tax policy. An example of this is was legislation introduced in the 112th Congress by Rep.
KS) that would have terminated all energy incentives.
, Rep. John Sullivan (R-OK) introduced the New Alternative Transportation to Give
Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) introduced companion legislation in
Menendez bill would have amended a variety of laws to promote
, including extending the natural gas fuel tax incentive. During the 112th Congress, t
bipartisan support in the House with over 180 cosponsors, but 18 members of the House took the
unusual step to remove their names as co-sponsors of the legislation.
Support the extension of a $0.50 per gallon equivalent tax incentive for
natural gas when used as a motor fuel.
: An older Transportation
LU provided a tax incentive for natural gas when used as a motor
per gallon equivalent incentive is provided to businesses, individuals, and tax-
and essentially becomes a rebate. The $0.50 incentive originally expired
at the end of Fiscal Year 2009, but has since been extended three times to the end of calendar year 2013,
rtially retroactively.
filling station in the Tampa
For 2012, the rebate
over the next several
market should determine what
the nation and that the Federal government should not in essence pick winners
Congress by Rep.
OK) introduced the New Alternative Transportation to Give
NJ) introduced companion legislation in
promote greater use of
Congress, the bill
, but 18 members of the House took the
the extension of a $0.50 per gallon equivalent tax incentive for
Attachment number 1 \nPage 10 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Public Safety Programs
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
many Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) programs are provided
as block grants with each state receiving a certain
That funding is then passed through to local jurisdictions to help support police, fire, emergency
management, and homeland security functions of government. In other instances, funding from federal
programs is made available to local governments via competitive grant solicitations. Specifically,
program funds can be used to hire police officers through Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS)
or firefighters through Staffing For Adequate Fire & Emerg
equipment through the Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) or Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG).
The City of Clearwater benefits from annual allocations from several of these
other programs offer competitive grant opportunities from which the City has
Most federal public safety programs saw a decrease in funding from Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 to FY 2012
However, in FY 2013, some actually received a slight increase
· For FY 2012, COPS hiring grants were funded at $166 million
increase to $176.7 million, even after sequestration
· For FY 2012, the JAG program
to $372.8 million after sequestration
· For FY 2012, the AFG program
$320.15 in FY 2013 after sequestration.
· For FY 2012, the SAFER grant program
$320.5 million in FY 2013 after sequestration
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Support
Justice and Department of Homeland Security grants
Justice Assistance Grants, Emergency Management Performance Grants, Assistance to Firefighters
Grants, and Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grants
Clearwater’s future applications for these funds
NOTES:
Page 6
Public Safety Programs
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: Federal grant funding for
many Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) programs are provided
as block grants with each state receiving a certain amount of funding, generally linked to population.
That funding is then passed through to local jurisdictions to help support police, fire, emergency
management, and homeland security functions of government. In other instances, funding from federal
rams is made available to local governments via competitive grant solicitations. Specifically,
program funds can be used to hire police officers through Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS)
or firefighters through Staffing For Adequate Fire & Emergency Response Grants (SAFER), purchase
equipment through the Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) or Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG).
The City of Clearwater benefits from annual allocations from several of these Federal programs, while
er competitive grant opportunities from which the City has traditionally
Most federal public safety programs saw a decrease in funding from Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 to FY 2012
However, in FY 2013, some actually received a slight increase.
FY 2012, COPS hiring grants were funded at $166 million, and in FY 2013 experience
, even after sequestration.
program was funded at $352 million, and in FY 2013 also had an increase
after sequestration.
the AFG program was funded at $337.5 million, but experienced a decrease to
after sequestration.
grant program was funded at $337.5 million, but also saw a decrease to
after sequestration.
Support adequate annual funding for a wide variety of Department of
Justice and Department of Homeland Security grants (e.g., Community Oriented Policing Services, Byrne
Grants, Emergency Management Performance Grants, Assistance to Firefighters
Grants, and Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Grants). Support the City of
applications for these funds.
Federal grant funding for
many Department of Justice (DOJ) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) programs are provided
amount of funding, generally linked to population.
That funding is then passed through to local jurisdictions to help support police, fire, emergency
management, and homeland security functions of government. In other instances, funding from federal
rams is made available to local governments via competitive grant solicitations. Specifically,
program funds can be used to hire police officers through Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS)
ency Response Grants (SAFER), purchase
equipment through the Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) or Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG).
programs, while
traditionally sought funds.
Most federal public safety programs saw a decrease in funding from Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 to FY 2012.
FY 2013 experienced an
FY 2013 also had an increase
, but experienced a decrease to
, but also saw a decrease to
a wide variety of Department of
e.g., Community Oriented Policing Services, Byrne
Grants, Emergency Management Performance Grants, Assistance to Firefighters
the City of
Attachment number 1 \nPage 11 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: The Corporation for
National Grant Program
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
signed the National and Community Service Trust Act
for National and Community Service
programs under the umbrella of one central organization.
network of national service programs
the United States to meet critical needs in education, public safety, health, and the environment.
the success of the program, and underscoring its bipartisan support,
Strengthen AmeriCorps Program Act, which
members in all categories.
For the past 18 years, the City of Clearwater’s Police Department has received Federal funding from
AmeriCorps’ State and National grant program through Florida’s State Service Commission, Volunteer
Florida. The Clearwater Police Department’s program offers a two
college students, which provides them the opportuni
These students are offered shadowing oppo
participating in day-to-day activities in the police department. After the two years, if the stu
proven themselves, they have the opportunity to be hired on as police officers. Since the inception of this
program, the Clearwater Police Department has hired permanently 20 police officers and promoted 4 to
supervisor positions.
The aforementioned bipartisan support for CNCS programs, including the AmeriCorps’ State and
National grant program, has waned in Congress during the past
and 2013, the House of Representatives approved their versi
and Education Appropriations bill, which included a 74 percent funding reduction
overall, and eliminated all AmeriCorps grant programs. Ultimately, in FY 2012, the CNCS was funded at
$1.048 billion, with the AmeriCorps’ State and National grant program receiving $344.3 million. It has
been determined that the CNCS will see an overall reduction in funding for FY 2013 of approximately
$53 million from its FY 2012 level.
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Su
Corporation for National and Community Service
grant program.
NOTES:
Page 7
Corporation for National and Community Service – AmeriCorps’ State and
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: President Bill Clinton
signed the National and Community Service Trust Act in 1993. This initiative established the Corporation
for National and Community Service (CNCS) and brought the full range of domestic community service
programs under the umbrella of one central organization. This legislation also created AmeriCorps,
rograms that provide intensive community service opportunities
to meet critical needs in education, public safety, health, and the environment.
the success of the program, and underscoring its bipartisan support, President George W.
Strengthen AmeriCorps Program Act, which authorized nearly double the number of AmeriCorps
For the past 18 years, the City of Clearwater’s Police Department has received Federal funding from
AmeriCorps’ State and National grant program through Florida’s State Service Commission, Volunteer
Florida. The Clearwater Police Department’s program offers a two-year public safety program to local
, which provides them the opportunity to work directly with law enforcement officials.
These students are offered shadowing opportunities such as going on ride-alongs with police officers, and
day activities in the police department. After the two years, if the stu
proven themselves, they have the opportunity to be hired on as police officers. Since the inception of this
program, the Clearwater Police Department has hired permanently 20 police officers and promoted 4 to
The aforementioned bipartisan support for CNCS programs, including the AmeriCorps’ State and
National grant program, has waned in Congress during the past few years. In both Fiscal Year (FY) 2012
and 2013, the House of Representatives approved their version of the Labor, Health and Human Services,
bill, which included a 74 percent funding reduction for CNCS programs
AmeriCorps grant programs. Ultimately, in FY 2012, the CNCS was funded at
lion, with the AmeriCorps’ State and National grant program receiving $344.3 million. It has
been determined that the CNCS will see an overall reduction in funding for FY 2013 of approximately
$53 million from its FY 2012 level.
Support continued annual funding for grant programs within the
Corporation for National and Community Service, particularly for the AmeriCorps State and National
AmeriCorps’ State and
President Bill Clinton
tablished the Corporation
and brought the full range of domestic community service
This legislation also created AmeriCorps, a
community service opportunities throughout
to meet critical needs in education, public safety, health, and the environment. Due to
George W. Bush signed the
nearly double the number of AmeriCorps
For the past 18 years, the City of Clearwater’s Police Department has received Federal funding from the
AmeriCorps’ State and National grant program through Florida’s State Service Commission, Volunteer
year public safety program to local
ty to work directly with law enforcement officials.
alongs with police officers, and
day activities in the police department. After the two years, if the students have
proven themselves, they have the opportunity to be hired on as police officers. Since the inception of this
program, the Clearwater Police Department has hired permanently 20 police officers and promoted 4 to
The aforementioned bipartisan support for CNCS programs, including the AmeriCorps’ State and
years. In both Fiscal Year (FY) 2012
Health and Human Services,
CNCS programs
AmeriCorps grant programs. Ultimately, in FY 2012, the CNCS was funded at
lion, with the AmeriCorps’ State and National grant program receiving $344.3 million. It has
been determined that the CNCS will see an overall reduction in funding for FY 2013 of approximately
funding for grant programs within the
, particularly for the AmeriCorps State and National
Attachment number 1 \nPage 12 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Prescription Drug Abuse
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
prescription drugs in the United States has resulted in reactions
Administration, Congress, and the s
reduction efforts due to complications
sold. In 2011, the Administration released the Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention Plan, which proposes
to increase enforcement, improve education, monitoring, and ensure the proper disposal of medication
While Florida and other states have enacted their own legislation
reduce prescription drug abuse on a national level
In 2010, the Florida Medical Examiner's Commission
showed Pinellas and Pasco Counties lead
Florida Prescription Drug Monitoring
whenever they prescribe and dispense
pain medication such as Xanax, Vicodin, OxyContin, etc.
already been prescribed or dispensed to an individual is not mandated
According to Chief Holloway, prescription drug abuse remains
The Drug Enforcement Agency classifies drugs based on t
are classified as schedule II, III, and IV drugs)
drugs (Vicodin, Norco, Lortab) have a
misclassified as Schedule III drugs.
providers that these painkillers are less dangerous or less powerful than their Schedule II counterparts.
In an effort to combat this problem,
in the House, and Senators Joe Manchin (D
“The Safe Prescribing Act of 2013.”
improve prescription standards for hydrocodone combination drugs
period, as Schedule II drugs. This would make
passed, the bill would also require the Government Accou
this legislation on legitimate patient access to these drugs.
The Safe Prescribing Act of 2013 has 4 additional cosponsors in the Senate and 40 in the House,
including several Florida delegation members from
prevention, health care and law enforcement organizations, including
Prescription Drug Abuse and the Fraternal Order of Police.
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Support
that aim to reduce prescription drug abuse.
NOTES:
Page 8
Prescription Drug Abuse
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: The growing abuse of
prescription drugs in the United States has resulted in reactions from both Federal and state officials. The
the state of Florida are supporting widespread prescription drug abuse
efforts due to complications that arise when prescription drugs are moved across borders to be
In 2011, the Administration released the Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention Plan, which proposes
rcement, improve education, monitoring, and ensure the proper disposal of medication
ve enacted their own legislation, Congress continues to discuss how to
on a national level.
the Florida Medical Examiner's Commission released a report on prescription drug abuse that
Counties leading the state in prescription drug overdose related
onitoring Program requires doctors and pharmacists to enter
whenever they prescribe and dispense controlled substance drugs. This has curbed access
such as Xanax, Vicodin, OxyContin, etc.. But, checking to see if one of these drugs has
already been prescribed or dispensed to an individual is not mandated, leaving an obvious loophole
According to Chief Holloway, prescription drug abuse remains a problem in the City of Clearwater.
The Drug Enforcement Agency classifies drugs based on their abuse potential and addictive nature
are classified as schedule II, III, and IV drugs). Research has shown that Hydrocodone combination
drugs (Vicodin, Norco, Lortab) have a high potential for addiction and abuse, indicating
This misclassification sends the wrong message to patients and
providers that these painkillers are less dangerous or less powerful than their Schedule II counterparts.
, Congressmen Vern Buchanan (R-FL) and Edward Markey (D
Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Mark Kirk (R-IL) in the Senate, ha
” This legislation would amend the Control Substances Act (CSA
improve prescription standards for hydrocodone combination drugs by reclassifying them
, as Schedule II drugs. This would make them much harder to prescribe and thus acquire
he bill would also require the Government Accounting Office to issue a report on the impact of
this legislation on legitimate patient access to these drugs.
has 4 additional cosponsors in the Senate and 40 in the House,
including several Florida delegation members from both parties. It is also supported by
prevention, health care and law enforcement organizations, including the National Coalition Against
and the Fraternal Order of Police.
Support the Safe Prescribing Act and other legislation
reduce prescription drug abuse.
The growing abuse of
from both Federal and state officials. The
prescription drug abuse
that arise when prescription drugs are moved across borders to be
In 2011, the Administration released the Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention Plan, which proposes
rcement, improve education, monitoring, and ensure the proper disposal of medication.
to discuss how to
released a report on prescription drug abuse that
prescription drug overdose related deaths. The
to enter into a database
access to addictive
checking to see if one of these drugs has
, leaving an obvious loophole.
ty of Clearwater.
heir abuse potential and addictive nature (these
Hydrocodone combination
, indicating they are currently
This misclassification sends the wrong message to patients and
providers that these painkillers are less dangerous or less powerful than their Schedule II counterparts.
and Edward Markey (D-MA),
have introduced
the Control Substances Act (CSA) to
reclassifying them, for a 3 year
much harder to prescribe and thus acquire. If
on the impact of
has 4 additional cosponsors in the Senate and 40 in the House,
supported by 17 drug
the National Coalition Against
legislation and initiatives
Attachment number 1 \nPage 13 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Tax-Exempt Bonds
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
bonds have been tax-exempt for almost 100
which target the tax exemption of tax
or reduce Federal spending. With local governments facing severe budget difficulties
limit the tax exemption would put more pressure on local finances by reducing demand for tax
bonds and increase borrowing costs for state and local governments, ultimately leading to higher taxes or
reduced services. Specifically:
· The Administration has proposed as part of a jobs and deficit reduction plan to limit the benefit of
itemized deductions and certain exclusions to 28 percent for higher income taxpayers.
· The Administration’s plan also includes a new debt reduction
exclusion for tax-exempt bond interest income below 28 percent. The new trigger could limit the
tax savings from tax-exempt bonds every year, increasing the risk and the cost of all tax
bonds.
· The Administration’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, also called
Simpson-Bowles, recommended a tax reform plan which would end the tax exemption for newly
issued state and local bonds.
· The Bipartisan Policy Center has proposed a tax reform plan, al
which would end the tax exemption for all new private
· Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR)
Simplification Act which would replace tax
· Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK)
which authorizes tribes to issue tax
· The Congressional Budget Office has released a report on r
a proposal to replace the tax exemption of municipal bonds with a direct subsidy for issuers.
Estimates have been provided that the difference in the rate of earnings that local governments would
need to offer prospective buyers of their taxable bonds would depend on the market, but may be roughly
1.35 percent more for those offerings. On $10 million borrowed, this would likely cost $1,660,000 over a
20 year term, a cost that would be borne by local taxpayers.
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Oppose
local bonds, including a 28 percent cap on tax
NOTES:
Page 9
Exempt Bonds
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: Although municipal
exempt for almost 100 years, a number of Federal proposals continue to be discussed
which target the tax exemption of tax-exempt bonds, particularly as part of the debate to end the sequester
or reduce Federal spending. With local governments facing severe budget difficulties, any proposal to
limit the tax exemption would put more pressure on local finances by reducing demand for tax
bonds and increase borrowing costs for state and local governments, ultimately leading to higher taxes or
The Administration has proposed as part of a jobs and deficit reduction plan to limit the benefit of
itemized deductions and certain exclusions to 28 percent for higher income taxpayers.
The Administration’s plan also includes a new debt reduction trigger which could further limit the
exempt bond interest income below 28 percent. The new trigger could limit the
exempt bonds every year, increasing the risk and the cost of all tax
n’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, also called
Bowles, recommended a tax reform plan which would end the tax exemption for newly
issued state and local bonds.
The Bipartisan Policy Center has proposed a tax reform plan, also known as Domenici
which would end the tax exemption for all new private-purpose bonds.
OR) and Dan Coats (R-IN) introduced the Bipartisan Tax Fairness and
Simplification Act which would replace tax-exempt bonds with taxable bonds and a tax credit.
OK) has proposed a tax reform plan which would repeal the program
which authorizes tribes to issue tax-exempt bonds for economic development purposes.
The Congressional Budget Office has released a report on revenue-raising options which includes
a proposal to replace the tax exemption of municipal bonds with a direct subsidy for issuers.
the difference in the rate of earnings that local governments would
tive buyers of their taxable bonds would depend on the market, but may be roughly
1.35 percent more for those offerings. On $10 million borrowed, this would likely cost $1,660,000 over a
20 year term, a cost that would be borne by local taxpayers.
Oppose legislation that would threaten the tax exemption on state and
local bonds, including a 28 percent cap on tax-exempt municipal bonds.
Although municipal
years, a number of Federal proposals continue to be discussed
exempt bonds, particularly as part of the debate to end the sequester
, any proposal to
limit the tax exemption would put more pressure on local finances by reducing demand for tax-exempt
bonds and increase borrowing costs for state and local governments, ultimately leading to higher taxes or
The Administration has proposed as part of a jobs and deficit reduction plan to limit the benefit of
itemized deductions and certain exclusions to 28 percent for higher income taxpayers.
trigger which could further limit the
exempt bond interest income below 28 percent. The new trigger could limit the
exempt bonds every year, increasing the risk and the cost of all tax-exempt
n’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, also called
Bowles, recommended a tax reform plan which would end the tax exemption for newly-
so known as Domenici-Rivlin,
introduced the Bipartisan Tax Fairness and
bonds and a tax credit.
has proposed a tax reform plan which would repeal the program
exempt bonds for economic development purposes.
raising options which includes
a proposal to replace the tax exemption of municipal bonds with a direct subsidy for issuers.
the difference in the rate of earnings that local governments would
tive buyers of their taxable bonds would depend on the market, but may be roughly
1.35 percent more for those offerings. On $10 million borrowed, this would likely cost $1,660,000 over a
threaten the tax exemption on state and
Attachment number 1 \nPage 14 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Sales-Tax Legislation
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
only required to collect sales tax in states where they have brick
to consumers to report to state tax departments any sales taxes they owe for online purchases. Often,
consumers do not report those purchases when completing their tax returns. As a result, local retailers are
at a competitive disadvantage because they must collect sales taxes while out
many large online and catalog retailers,
local sales taxes. Consumers are left with the confusing yet legal responsibility to report the sales taxes
owed on online purchases on their tax returns.
The current sales tax system is perceived as being unfair to brick
residents, including local stores as well as national chains like Best Buy or Home Depot. It is also a drain
on local government revenues. In 2012, uncollected sales tax is estima
billion nationwide.
To correct this inequity, legislation
as having the best chance of becoming law. The bipartisan legislation
and for the first time had the backing of some major online retailers such as Amazon.com. In the House,
similar, bipartisan legislation also gained traction with 5
both pieces of legislation exempted
from the requirement to collect the tax.
Local, state, and national business groups, such as the Florida Chamber of Commerce, Associated
Industries of Florida, Florida TaxWatch, Flori
favor of these types of bills.
This bill has been reintroduced in the
support with 22 cosponsors in the Senate and
Crenshaw, Deutch, Ross, and Diaz-Balart. Legislation of this type
spending reduction or tax reform measure in the 113
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Support
sales to collect and remit the associated taxes.
NOTES:
Page 10
Tax Legislation
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: Currently, retailers are
only required to collect sales tax in states where they have brick-and-mortar stores. The burden then falls
to consumers to report to state tax departments any sales taxes they owe for online purchases. Often,
nsumers do not report those purchases when completing their tax returns. As a result, local retailers are
at a competitive disadvantage because they must collect sales taxes while out-of-state retailers, including
many large online and catalog retailers, in effect give their customers a discount by collecting no state or
local sales taxes. Consumers are left with the confusing yet legal responsibility to report the sales taxes
owed on online purchases on their tax returns.
perceived as being unfair to brick-and-mortar retailers that employ local
residents, including local stores as well as national chains like Best Buy or Home Depot. It is also a drain
on local government revenues. In 2012, uncollected sales tax is estimated to cost local governments $23
was introduced in the Senate during the 112th Congress and
as having the best chance of becoming law. The bipartisan legislation was cosponsored by 19 Se
the backing of some major online retailers such as Amazon.com. In the House,
also gained traction with 56 cosponsors. To protect small, online retailers,
sellers who make less than $500,000 in total remote sales to qualify
from the requirement to collect the tax.
Local, state, and national business groups, such as the Florida Chamber of Commerce, Associated
Industries of Florida, Florida TaxWatch, Florida Retail Federation, and Amazon.com have spoken out in
been reintroduced in the House and Senate in the 113th Congress, and already has significant
cosponsors in the Senate and 42 cosponsors in the House, including Florida Reps.
Balart. Legislation of this type could be also wrapped up into a future
spending reduction or tax reform measure in the 113th Congress.
Support legislation that requires companies making catalog and internet
sales to collect and remit the associated taxes.
Currently, retailers are
mortar stores. The burden then falls
to consumers to report to state tax departments any sales taxes they owe for online purchases. Often,
nsumers do not report those purchases when completing their tax returns. As a result, local retailers are
state retailers, including
in effect give their customers a discount by collecting no state or
local sales taxes. Consumers are left with the confusing yet legal responsibility to report the sales taxes
mortar retailers that employ local
residents, including local stores as well as national chains like Best Buy or Home Depot. It is also a drain
ted to cost local governments $23
Congress and was seen
cosponsored by 19 Senators,
the backing of some major online retailers such as Amazon.com. In the House,
cosponsors. To protect small, online retailers,
remote sales to qualify
Local, state, and national business groups, such as the Florida Chamber of Commerce, Associated
da Retail Federation, and Amazon.com have spoken out in
Congress, and already has significant
the House, including Florida Reps.
wrapped up into a future
equires companies making catalog and internet
Attachment number 1 \nPage 15 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Transient Occupancy Taxes
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
attempts were made by senior Senators to insert language into various pieces of legislation that would
have exempted online travel brokers (Expedia, Travelocity, etc.) from remitting the full bed tax rate
collected from consumers to the appropri
were to pay $60 for a room in the City of Clearwater
would be able to, under the proposal, only remit $6 dollars to the local government in
10 percent bed tax for illustrative purposes).
In late 2009, 17 Florida counties, including Pinellas,
companies alleging that the companies
development tax ordinances. During 2012, there were several Florida State Circuit Court cases that ruled
in favor of the online travel brokers. Two cited that Florida law is not clear on the issue, while a Circuit
Court Judge ruled more directly in July that the
discounted rates they paid for the rooms.
In Fiscal Year 2012, Pinellas County collected
is used to support the tourism industry in our region.
Aquarium have suggested using a portion of the transient occupancy tax that currently goes toward
paying the debt on Tropicana Field for the proposed Clearwater Marine Aquarium, once it sunsets in
2016. This “stadium tax” alone generates nearly $5.5 million per year in revenue. Given the importance
of this project to the City of Clearwater,
revenue source and the need to ensure it is not constrained by detrimental legislation.
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Oppose
taxes on the full room rate paid by the consumer, thereby costing
collect the appropriate Transient Occupancy Taxes from visitors to the region.
NOTES:
Page 11
Transient Occupancy Taxes
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: In the 111
attempts were made by senior Senators to insert language into various pieces of legislation that would
have exempted online travel brokers (Expedia, Travelocity, etc.) from remitting the full bed tax rate
collected from consumers to the appropriate local government. For instance, if an online travel broker
the City of Clearwater and then sell that room to a consumer for $100, they
would be able to, under the proposal, only remit $6 dollars to the local government instead of $10 (using a
10 percent bed tax for illustrative purposes).
, including Pinellas, filed an action against a number of online travel
the companies have failed to collect and/or pay taxes under the
During 2012, there were several Florida State Circuit Court cases that ruled
. Two cited that Florida law is not clear on the issue, while a Circuit
led more directly in July that the online travel broker only owes local tourist taxes on the
discounted rates they paid for the rooms.
County collected a record $27.1 million in transient occupancy taxes, which
is used to support the tourism industry in our region. Recently, officials with the Clearwater Marine
Aquarium have suggested using a portion of the transient occupancy tax that currently goes toward
Tropicana Field for the proposed Clearwater Marine Aquarium, once it sunsets in
2016. This “stadium tax” alone generates nearly $5.5 million per year in revenue. Given the importance
arwater, and this level of funding, underscores the significance
revenue source and the need to ensure it is not constrained by detrimental legislation.
Oppose legislation that would exempt online travel brokers from paying
y the consumer, thereby costing Pinellas County the opportunity to
collect the appropriate Transient Occupancy Taxes from visitors to the region.
In the 111th Congress,
attempts were made by senior Senators to insert language into various pieces of legislation that would
have exempted online travel brokers (Expedia, Travelocity, etc.) from remitting the full bed tax rate
an online travel broker
and then sell that room to a consumer for $100, they
stead of $10 (using a
an action against a number of online travel
er the respective tourist
During 2012, there were several Florida State Circuit Court cases that ruled
. Two cited that Florida law is not clear on the issue, while a Circuit
local tourist taxes on the
in transient occupancy taxes, which
the Clearwater Marine
Aquarium have suggested using a portion of the transient occupancy tax that currently goes toward
Tropicana Field for the proposed Clearwater Marine Aquarium, once it sunsets in
2016. This “stadium tax” alone generates nearly $5.5 million per year in revenue. Given the importance
significance of this
travel brokers from paying
County the opportunity to
Attachment number 1 \nPage 16 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Economic Development Administration
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
Development Administration (EDA) is primarily a granting agency that funds economic development
projects throughout the country. Successful projects usually leverage roughly 200 new jobs and $24
million in private investment for every $1 million of EDA investment.
The City of Clearwater has identifie
with the highest growth potential. The City recently entered into an agreement
Innovation Center to create and implement a “Virtual Incubator Program
and learning opportunities to help foster
offer all of the benefits of the traditional “bricks and mortar” incuba
Should this prove to be a successful endeavor,
location space and partially transition th
The President’s Deficit Commission, as well as more recent Congressional proposals, has proposed the
elimination of EDA, as its mission is seen as duplicative by some. In June 2012
the “Economic Development Revitalization Act,” which would have reauthorized the Economic
Development Administration (EDA) through 2015. EDA’s authorization expired in September 2008, but
funding via the appropriations process has kept it functioning without an authori
reauthorizing EDA, the Senate legislation would increase the authorized funding for the program from
$300 to $500 million annually. Despite the failure to pass the legislation, the EDA will continue to
operate through the annual appropriations process if provided sufficient funding by Congress.
In Fiscal Year (FY) 2011, Congress provi
$257 million in funding. For FY 2013, Congress ultimately provided $221 million for the ED
includes $184 million for Economic Development Assistance Programs
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Support
Administration. Support City of Clearwater
NOTES:
Page 12
omic Development Administration
HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: The Economic
Development Administration (EDA) is primarily a granting agency that funds economic development
ojects throughout the country. Successful projects usually leverage roughly 200 new jobs and $24
ion in private investment for every $1 million of EDA investment.
identified information technology and software as one of its
. The City recently entered into an agreement with the Tampa Bay
Innovation Center to create and implement a “Virtual Incubator Program,” which will offer mentoring
and learning opportunities to help foster and grow this promising industry in Clearwater. It
aditional “bricks and mortar” incubator, but without a physical location.
Should this prove to be a successful endeavor, it may be possible to work with the EDA to
transition the City’s program to a more traditional business
The President’s Deficit Commission, as well as more recent Congressional proposals, has proposed the
elimination of EDA, as its mission is seen as duplicative by some. In June 2012, the Senate failed to pass
Development Revitalization Act,” which would have reauthorized the Economic
Development Administration (EDA) through 2015. EDA’s authorization expired in September 2008, but
funding via the appropriations process has kept it functioning without an authorization. In addition to
reauthorizing EDA, the Senate legislation would increase the authorized funding for the program from
$300 to $500 million annually. Despite the failure to pass the legislation, the EDA will continue to
propriations process if provided sufficient funding by Congress.
In Fiscal Year (FY) 2011, Congress provided $283 million for the EDA, and in FY 2012
$257 million in funding. For FY 2013, Congress ultimately provided $221 million for the ED
includes $184 million for Economic Development Assistance Programs.
Support continued funding of the Economic Development
City of Clearwater grant applications through the program.
The Economic
Development Administration (EDA) is primarily a granting agency that funds economic development
ojects throughout the country. Successful projects usually leverage roughly 200 new jobs and $24
industry clusters
with the Tampa Bay
” which will offer mentoring
and grow this promising industry in Clearwater. It is expected to
tor, but without a physical location.
work with the EDA to fund co-
business incubator model.
The President’s Deficit Commission, as well as more recent Congressional proposals, has proposed the
the Senate failed to pass
Development Revitalization Act,” which would have reauthorized the Economic
Development Administration (EDA) through 2015. EDA’s authorization expired in September 2008, but
zation. In addition to
reauthorizing EDA, the Senate legislation would increase the authorized funding for the program from
$300 to $500 million annually. Despite the failure to pass the legislation, the EDA will continue to
propriations process if provided sufficient funding by Congress.
n FY 2012 they provided
$257 million in funding. For FY 2013, Congress ultimately provided $221 million for the EDA, which
omic Development
Attachment number 1 \nPage 17 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Department of Housing and Urban Development
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
receives direct allocations of funding from two Department of Housing and Urban Development (
formula programs: the HOME Investment Partnership
Grants (CDBG).
HOME funds are designed to create affordable housing for low
annually as formula grants to participating jurisd
establishes HOME Investment Trust Funds for each grantee, providing a line of credit that the jurisdiction
may draw upon as needed. The program allows local governments to use HOME funds for grants, direct
loans, loan guarantees or other forms of credit enhancement, or rental assistance or security deposits.
CDBG is a flexible grant program that provides communities with Federal funding to address a wide
range of unique community development needs. The CDBG
formula basis to units of local government and
In Fiscal Year (FY) 2012, HOME was reduced by 38 percent, from $1.6 billion in
in 2012. In FY 2011, the City of Clearwater
City received a significant 40 percent reduction to
Similarly, CDBG funding was cut by nearly 12 percent, from $3.3 billion in
FY 2012. In FY 2011, the City of Clearwater
received a 14 percent reduction to $719,955
each community as well as changes to the type of data they use
For FY 2013, the CDBG formula program will
FY 2012 due to the fact that it includes $300 million in funding that was removed from the CDBG
program to be put toward emergency supplemental bill for Superstorm Sandy recovery. The
program will see a cut of $50 million
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Support
the Community Development Block Grants and the HOME Investment Partnerships p
their critical role in the City’s overall
NOTES:
Page 13
Department of Housing and Urban Development Formula Programs
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: The City of Clearwater
direct allocations of funding from two Department of Housing and Urban Development (
formula programs: the HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) and Community Development Block
HOME funds are designed to create affordable housing for low-income households and are awarded
annually as formula grants to participating jurisdictions, including the City of Clearwater
establishes HOME Investment Trust Funds for each grantee, providing a line of credit that the jurisdiction
may draw upon as needed. The program allows local governments to use HOME funds for grants, direct
oans, loan guarantees or other forms of credit enhancement, or rental assistance or security deposits.
program that provides communities with Federal funding to address a wide
range of unique community development needs. The CDBG program provides annual grants on a
formula basis to units of local government and states, including the City of Clearwater.
2012, HOME was reduced by 38 percent, from $1.6 billion in FY 2011 to $1 billion
City of Clearwater received $500,323 in HOME funding, while in
a significant 40 percent reduction to $301,560.
Similarly, CDBG funding was cut by nearly 12 percent, from $3.3 billion in FY 2011 to $2.948 billion in
the City of Clearwater received a total of $838,241, while in FY
$719,955. HUD explains that this is due to changing demographics in
each community as well as changes to the type of data they use to make their funding decisions.
formula program will be funded at $3.1 billion. This is a small increase from
FY 2012 due to the fact that it includes $300 million in funding that was removed from the CDBG
program to be put toward emergency supplemental bill for Superstorm Sandy recovery. The
lion from FY 2012 to $950 million for FY 2013.
Support at continued adequate funding for future fiscal years
Community Development Block Grants and the HOME Investment Partnerships program
overall efforts to support those that are least fortunate.
Formula Programs
The City of Clearwater
direct allocations of funding from two Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
(HOME) and Community Development Block
income households and are awarded
the City of Clearwater. HUD
establishes HOME Investment Trust Funds for each grantee, providing a line of credit that the jurisdiction
may draw upon as needed. The program allows local governments to use HOME funds for grants, direct
oans, loan guarantees or other forms of credit enhancement, or rental assistance or security deposits.
program that provides communities with Federal funding to address a wide
program provides annual grants on a
2011 to $1 billion
, while in FY 2012, the
2011 to $2.948 billion in
FY 2012, the City
HUD explains that this is due to changing demographics in
to make their funding decisions.
. This is a small increase from
FY 2012 due to the fact that it includes $300 million in funding that was removed from the CDBG
program to be put toward emergency supplemental bill for Superstorm Sandy recovery. The HOME
for future fiscal years for both
rograms because of
Attachment number 1 \nPage 18 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Supportive Housing for the Elderly
Housing and Urban Development’s
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
Development (HUD) Section 202 program helps expand the supply of affordable housing with supportive
services for the elderly by providing interes
finance the development of housing. The capital advance does not have to be repaid as long as the project
serves very low-income elderly persons for 40 years.
The Section 202 program also provides
HUD-approved operating cost for the project and the tenants' contribution towards rent. Project rental
assistance contracts are approved initially for 3 years and are renewable based on
The HUD Section 811 program is authorized to provide funding to develop and subsidize rental housing
with an availability of supportive services for very low
Section 811 program provided interest
developers of affordable housing for persons with disabilities
program. However, in Fiscal Year 2012, Congress
moved toward providing funding for
entered into partnerships with state health and human services and Medicaid agencies
to multifamily housing complexes that provide a range of services for the disabled.
In Pinellas County, the non-profit Boley Centers, Inc. receives
distribute to several housing complexes throughout the County, including
Apartments in Clearwater, which provides housing for disabled veterans.
In Fiscal Year (FY) 2012, the HUD Section 202 program received $374.6 million, and the Section 811
program received $165 million. For FY 2013, b
their FY 2012 levels due to sequestration
additional reductions in future years, particularly as the House
spending.
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Support
of Housing and Urban Development’s
Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities Program (S
NOTES:
Page 14
: Supportive Housing for the Elderly and for Persons with Disabilities
t’s Section 202 and 811 Programs
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: The Housing and Urban
Section 202 program helps expand the supply of affordable housing with supportive
services for the elderly by providing interest-free capital advances to private, nonprofit sponsors to
finance the development of housing. The capital advance does not have to be repaid as long as the project
income elderly persons for 40 years.
The Section 202 program also provides project rental assistance funds to cover the difference between the
approved operating cost for the project and the tenants' contribution towards rent. Project rental
assistance contracts are approved initially for 3 years and are renewable based on the availability of funds.
The HUD Section 811 program is authorized to provide funding to develop and subsidize rental housing
with an availability of supportive services for very low-income adults with disabilities. Traditionally, the
interest-free capital advances and operating subsidies to nonprofit
developers of affordable housing for persons with disabilities, in a similar manner to the Section 202
program. However, in Fiscal Year 2012, Congress chose not to fund these activities, and instead have
for rental assistance. These funds go to state housing agencies
entered into partnerships with state health and human services and Medicaid agencies, and are distributed
that provide a range of services for the disabled.
profit Boley Centers, Inc. receives HUD Section 202 and 811
distribute to several housing complexes throughout the County, including the Jerry Howe Transitional
, which provides housing for disabled veterans.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2012, the HUD Section 202 program received $374.6 million, and the Section 811
For FY 2013, both of these programs will see about a 5
sequestration, to $355.87 and $156.75 respectively. These programs
additional reductions in future years, particularly as the House of Representatives seeks to reduce Federal
Support continued adequate annual Federal funding of the Department
of Housing and Urban Development’s Supportive Housing for the Elderly Program (Section 202), and
Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities Program (Section 811).
and for Persons with Disabilities - Department of
: The Housing and Urban
Section 202 program helps expand the supply of affordable housing with supportive
free capital advances to private, nonprofit sponsors to
finance the development of housing. The capital advance does not have to be repaid as long as the project
project rental assistance funds to cover the difference between the
approved operating cost for the project and the tenants' contribution towards rent. Project rental
the availability of funds.
The HUD Section 811 program is authorized to provide funding to develop and subsidize rental housing
Traditionally, the
free capital advances and operating subsidies to nonprofit
, in a similar manner to the Section 202
ctivities, and instead have
to state housing agencies that have
, and are distributed
HUD Section 202 and 811 funding to
Howe Transitional
Fiscal Year (FY) 2012, the HUD Section 202 program received $374.6 million, and the Section 811
5 percent cut from
. These programs may face
ks to reduce Federal
annual Federal funding of the Department
(Section 202), and
Attachment number 1 \nPage 19 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Homeless Assistance
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act
population in the United States. It originally created several
and Urban Development (HUD) that focused on combating the root causes of homelessness.
McKinney-Vento Act has been amended many times, most recently in
signed the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act
updated and expanded the definition of homelessness and
McKinney-Vento. Under the HEARTH Act,
programs, the Supportive Housing Program
Occupancy (SRO) program, were grouped under
The CoC program provides competitive grant
communities seeking funds to develop
problem of homelessness through a coordinated community
building a system to address them.
not caused merely by a lack of shelter, but involves a variety of underlying, unmet needs
economic, and social.
Under the CoC program, the SHP provide
state to a more stable living situation. The
homeless achieve residential stability, and increase their independence through progr
their skill and/or income levels.
The S+C program provides rental assistance that, when combined with social services, provides
supportive housing for homeless people with disabilities and their families. The program allows for a
variety of housing choices such as group homes or individual units, coupled with a range of supportive
services.
The SRO was created to expand suitable residential opport
accomplished through compensating
improvements made to kitchen and bathroom facilities in eligible SRO
assistance for the residents that occupy those units
Under the HEARTH Act, HUD also
program, which include the following: housing search
repair; provision of security or utility deposits; rental assistance
with moving costs; and/or other activities that help homeless
or would benefit individuals who have moved into permanent
HUD requirement is that established
renewal projects, which are most likely to receive funding, and Tier II renewal projects, wh
dependent on the resources still available and the strength of the CoC’s applicati
Leadership Board (HLB) is the CoC for
The CoC competitive grants are funded in the Homeless Assistance Grants account
Year (FY) 2012, the whole account received $1.901 billion
Tier I renewal projects, from which several HLB CoC projects were funded. This included
Page 15
Homeless Assistance Competitive Grants – Continuum of Care Program
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: In 1987, Congress passed
Vento Homeless Assistance Act in response to the issue of an increasing homelessness
population in the United States. It originally created several programs within the Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD) that focused on combating the root causes of homelessness.
has been amended many times, most recently in 2009, when President Obama
signed the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act
updated and expanded the definition of homelessness and made changes to existing programs
Under the HEARTH Act, three previously separate HUD homeless assistance
Supportive Housing Program (SHP), Shelter Plus Care program (S+C), and Single Room
grouped under the single umbrella Continuum of Care
competitive grant funding to local governments and non-profits
to develop a Continuum of Care system designed to address the critical
problem of homelessness through a coordinated community-based process of identifying needs and
The approach is predicated on the understanding that homelessness
not caused merely by a lack of shelter, but involves a variety of underlying, unmet needs
provides assistance to help the homeless transition from their current
state to a more stable living situation. The goals of the program are to provide assistance that helps the
achieve residential stability, and increase their independence through programs that
program provides rental assistance that, when combined with social services, provides
supportive housing for homeless people with disabilities and their families. The program allows for a
of housing choices such as group homes or individual units, coupled with a range of supportive
SRO was created to expand suitable residential opportunities for homeless individuals. This has been
compensating owners of eligible SRO residences, for a period of 10 years, for
to kitchen and bathroom facilities in eligible SRO residences, and providing
the residents that occupy those units.
also added 12 new eligible activities for funding under the single
the following: housing search mediation or outreach to property owners; credit
repair; provision of security or utility deposits; rental assistance for a final month at a locat
with moving costs; and/or other activities that help homeless individuals move immediately into housing
or would benefit individuals who have moved into permanent housing in the last 6 months.
quirement is that established CoC’s rank their projects for funding into two categories: Tier I
renewal projects, which are most likely to receive funding, and Tier II renewal projects, wh
dependent on the resources still available and the strength of the CoC’s application. The Homeless
is the CoC for Pinellas County.
The CoC competitive grants are funded in the Homeless Assistance Grants account for HUD and i
the whole account received $1.901 billion. Approximately $1.5 billion went to
, from which several HLB CoC projects were funded. This included
Continuum of Care Program
In 1987, Congress passed
in response to the issue of an increasing homelessness
n the Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD) that focused on combating the root causes of homelessness. The
President Obama
signed the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act, which
programs under
assistance
and Single Room
Continuum of Care (CoC) program.
profits, and requires
a Continuum of Care system designed to address the critical
based process of identifying needs and
on the understanding that homelessness is
not caused merely by a lack of shelter, but involves a variety of underlying, unmet needs - physical,
assistance to help the homeless transition from their current
goals of the program are to provide assistance that helps the
ams that increase
program provides rental assistance that, when combined with social services, provides
supportive housing for homeless people with disabilities and their families. The program allows for a
of housing choices such as group homes or individual units, coupled with a range of supportive
unities for homeless individuals. This has been
eligible SRO residences, for a period of 10 years, for
providing rental
the single CoC
mediation or outreach to property owners; credit
for a final month at a location; assistance
individuals move immediately into housing
housing in the last 6 months. Another new
CoC’s rank their projects for funding into two categories: Tier I
renewal projects, which are most likely to receive funding, and Tier II renewal projects, whose funding is
on. The Homeless
for HUD and in Fiscal
pproximately $1.5 billion went to CoC
, from which several HLB CoC projects were funded. This included $166,740 to
Attachment number 1 \nPage 20 of 27
Item # 20
renew two CoC projects in the City: Baty Villas, which provides permanent supportive housing with 16
single-family units, and Carlton Home,
including veterans. FY 2012 Tier II
but the Haven of RCS (Religious Community Services),
domestic violence and their families
For FY 2013, the amount for to the Homeless Assistance
due to an anomaly, or an exception,
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Support
and Urban Development Homeless Assistance Grants, particularly for the Continuum of Care Program.
NOTES:
Page 16
: Baty Villas, which provides permanent supportive housing with 16
and Carlton Home, which provides long-term group living for 8 single adults,
Tier II projects had not been announced as of the completion of this agenda,
but the Haven of RCS (Religious Community Services), which offers transitional housing to
domestic violence and their families, could also ultimately receive funding.
to the Homeless Assistance Grant account was increased to $
due to an anomaly, or an exception, in the Continuing Resolution.
Support continued adequate annual funding for Department of Housing
and Urban Development Homeless Assistance Grants, particularly for the Continuum of Care Program.
: Baty Villas, which provides permanent supportive housing with 16
ngle adults,
projects had not been announced as of the completion of this agenda,
transitional housing to victims of
to $1.931 billion
annual funding for Department of Housing
and Urban Development Homeless Assistance Grants, particularly for the Continuum of Care Program.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 21 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Offshore Energy Exploration
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
drilling currently occurs in both the western and central Gulf of Mexico. However, nearly the entire
eastern Gulf is protected from drilling unti
(GOMESA).
In the 112th Congress, the House of Representatives voted to dramatically expand offshore oil drilling in
an effort to lower gas prices and increase domestic revenue.
of legislation that would reverse all current oil moratoriums
oil projects that were rejected after the Deepwater Horizon spill
Continental Shelf that is currently unavailable to lease available for drilling, including the eastern Gulf o
Mexico and the Atlantic Coast. Similar legislation was introduced in the Senate, but it failed to receive
the necessary votes to be considered.
In November of 2011, the Administration proposed its Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas
Leasing Program for 2012-2017. Within the program, the Administration proposes to lease two new
areas in the eastern Gulf of Mexico (among other areas of the Gulf and near Alaska). T
proposed for lease in the eastern Gulf are south of the coast of Florida and are as far west as you can get
without being in the central Gulf. There are already active leases near the two new areas. These are the
only parts of the eastern Gulf that are not protected by GOMESA.
In response to the plan, 180 members of Congress from both political parties sent a letter to the
Administration asking that they open up more areas of the OCS to drilling, including additional areas in
the eastern Gulf. Four members of the Florida House delegation signed the letter. If this policy was
accepted, it could open the door for an expansion of drilling
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Monitor
Florida’s Federal waters.
NOTES:
Page 17
: Offshore Energy Exploration
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: Active offshore
drilling currently occurs in both the western and central Gulf of Mexico. However, nearly the entire
eastern Gulf is protected from drilling until 2022 by the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006
Congress, the House of Representatives voted to dramatically expand offshore oil drilling in
an effort to lower gas prices and increase domestic revenue. Specifically, the House passed three pieces
rse all current oil moratoriums, require the Department of Interior to revisit
ter the Deepwater Horizon spill, and make acreage of the Outer
s currently unavailable to lease available for drilling, including the eastern Gulf o
. Similar legislation was introduced in the Senate, but it failed to receive
the necessary votes to be considered.
e Administration proposed its Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas
2017. Within the program, the Administration proposes to lease two new
areas in the eastern Gulf of Mexico (among other areas of the Gulf and near Alaska). T
proposed for lease in the eastern Gulf are south of the coast of Florida and are as far west as you can get
without being in the central Gulf. There are already active leases near the two new areas. These are the
lf that are not protected by GOMESA.
In response to the plan, 180 members of Congress from both political parties sent a letter to the
Administration asking that they open up more areas of the OCS to drilling, including additional areas in
f. Four members of the Florida House delegation signed the letter. If this policy was
accepted, it could open the door for an expansion of drilling in the eastern Gulf.
Monitor the potential expansion of offshore energy exploration in
offshore energy
drilling currently occurs in both the western and central Gulf of Mexico. However, nearly the entire
co Energy Security Act of 2006
Congress, the House of Representatives voted to dramatically expand offshore oil drilling in
House passed three pieces
, require the Department of Interior to revisit
, and make acreage of the Outer
s currently unavailable to lease available for drilling, including the eastern Gulf of
. Similar legislation was introduced in the Senate, but it failed to receive
e Administration proposed its Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas
2017. Within the program, the Administration proposes to lease two new
areas in the eastern Gulf of Mexico (among other areas of the Gulf and near Alaska). The two areas
proposed for lease in the eastern Gulf are south of the coast of Florida and are as far west as you can get
without being in the central Gulf. There are already active leases near the two new areas. These are the
In response to the plan, 180 members of Congress from both political parties sent a letter to the
Administration asking that they open up more areas of the OCS to drilling, including additional areas in
f. Four members of the Florida House delegation signed the letter. If this policy was
exploration in
Attachment number 1 \nPage 22 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Environmental Protection Agency
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
Protection Agency (EPA) administers a cleanup program to provide financial assistance to state, local,
and tribal governmental entities for certain types of
“brownfields.” Sites eligible for this assistance tend to be where the known or suspected presence of
contamination may present an impediment to economic development, but where the risks generally are
not high enough for the site to be addressed under the Superfund program or other rela
authorities. The brownfields program focuses on providing Federal financial assistance for “orphan” sites
at which the potential need for cleanup remains unaddressed. EPA’s brownfields program awards two
different categories of grants: one com
eligible for the former of the two.
Clearwater’s Brownfields Area (CBA) covers 1,842 acres and includes
over 7,000 properties. Over 125 of these sites hav
from less than one acre to over 40 acres. The CBA economic development potential has greatly decreased
over the past 30 years. Private disinvestment combined with environmental decline has left an indel
mark on the area, characterized by business and job loss
abandoned lands tainted by former gas stations, dry cleaning facilities, print shops, and other similar uses.
As a result of crime, distress, and econ
Justice Operation Weed & Seed site
Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) by the U.S. Small Business Administration
The City of Clearwater has implemented one of the most successful
having completed over 100 assessment projects,
environmental issues that need to be addressed
contaminated sites in the CBA that may require env
funding for these and previously assessed
In Fiscal Year (FY) 2012, Congress provided the EPA with $144.1 million for their brownfields grant
programs. Of that amount, a little more than $94 million was available via the Section 104(k) competitive
grant program. In the two fiscal years prior to FY 2012, fun
overall and the competitive grant programs.
In FY 2013, the Congress funded the program at FY 2012 level
was reduced by 5 percent to $133.86 million
to the Section 104(k) competitive grant program.
Within the competitive grant program, the EPA offers assessment, cleanup, and revolving loan fund
grants. An eligible entity may apply for up to $200,000 per site. In
a need to obtain additional cleanup funding for various sites.
$200,000 of Federal funding per project
To facilitate site remediation and reuse, the funding maximum should be
resources to remediate orphan brownfield sites.
In the 113th Congress, Senators Frank Lautenberg (NJ), James Inhofe
Mike Crapo (ID) introduced the Brownfields Utilization, Investment, and Local Development (BUILD)
Act of 2013 to reauthorize the brownfields program through 2015. The bill would maintain the current
Page 18
Environmental Protection Agency’s Brownfields Program
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: The Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) administers a cleanup program to provide financial assistance to state, local,
and tribal governmental entities for certain types of contaminated industrial sites, referred to as
or this assistance tend to be where the known or suspected presence of
contamination may present an impediment to economic development, but where the risks generally are
not high enough for the site to be addressed under the Superfund program or other related cleanup
authorities. The brownfields program focuses on providing Federal financial assistance for “orphan” sites
at which the potential need for cleanup remains unaddressed. EPA’s brownfields program awards two
different categories of grants: one competitive and one formula-based. The City of Clearwater is only
Clearwater’s Brownfields Area (CBA) covers 1,842 acres and includes over 250 regulatory listed sites in
Over 125 of these sites have reported contamination. These sites range in size
from less than one acre to over 40 acres. The CBA economic development potential has greatly decreased
Private disinvestment combined with environmental decline has left an indel
mark on the area, characterized by business and job loss, impacting the CBA by leaving a legacy of
abandoned lands tainted by former gas stations, dry cleaning facilities, print shops, and other similar uses.
As a result of crime, distress, and economic deterioration, the CBA was designated a U.S. Department of
Justice Operation Weed & Seed site in 1996, and a portion of the area has also been designated
Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) by the U.S. Small Business Administration
implemented one of the most successful brownfields programs in the country,
having completed over 100 assessment projects, but continues to have significant health, welfare, and
to be addressed. Clearwater has identified more than 125 additional
that may require environmental assessment. The City will need Federal
these and previously assessed sites to complete reuse planning and cleanup.
ar (FY) 2012, Congress provided the EPA with $144.1 million for their brownfields grant
programs. Of that amount, a little more than $94 million was available via the Section 104(k) competitive
grant program. In the two fiscal years prior to FY 2012, funding was relatively similar for both the
overall and the competitive grant programs.
funded the program at FY 2012 levels, but due to sequestration
to $133.86 million for the overall program, with just over $89 million
to the Section 104(k) competitive grant program.
Within the competitive grant program, the EPA offers assessment, cleanup, and revolving loan fund
grants. An eligible entity may apply for up to $200,000 per site. In the near future, Clearwater
nup funding for various sites. Unfortunately, the current
of Federal funding per project is extremely restrictive, as many site cleanups exceed $1
site remediation and reuse, the funding maximum should be increased to allow
orphan brownfield sites.
Congress, Senators Frank Lautenberg (NJ), James Inhofe (OK), Tom Udall (NM), and
Crapo (ID) introduced the Brownfields Utilization, Investment, and Local Development (BUILD)
Act of 2013 to reauthorize the brownfields program through 2015. The bill would maintain the current
: The Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) administers a cleanup program to provide financial assistance to state, local,
sites, referred to as
or this assistance tend to be where the known or suspected presence of
contamination may present an impediment to economic development, but where the risks generally are
ted cleanup
authorities. The brownfields program focuses on providing Federal financial assistance for “orphan” sites
at which the potential need for cleanup remains unaddressed. EPA’s brownfields program awards two
based. The City of Clearwater is only
regulatory listed sites in
These sites range in size
from less than one acre to over 40 acres. The CBA economic development potential has greatly decreased
Private disinvestment combined with environmental decline has left an indelible
impacting the CBA by leaving a legacy of
abandoned lands tainted by former gas stations, dry cleaning facilities, print shops, and other similar uses.
U.S. Department of
has also been designated an
Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) by the U.S. Small Business Administration.
rownfields programs in the country,
to have significant health, welfare, and
more than 125 additional
assessment. The City will need Federal
ar (FY) 2012, Congress provided the EPA with $144.1 million for their brownfields grant
programs. Of that amount, a little more than $94 million was available via the Section 104(k) competitive
ding was relatively similar for both the
, but due to sequestration, each program
just over $89 million allocated
Within the competitive grant program, the EPA offers assessment, cleanup, and revolving loan fund
Clearwater may have
Unfortunately, the current limitation of
, as many site cleanups exceed $1 million.
increased to allow for necessary
OK), Tom Udall (NM), and
Crapo (ID) introduced the Brownfields Utilization, Investment, and Local Development (BUILD)
Act of 2013 to reauthorize the brownfields program through 2015. The bill would maintain the current
Attachment number 1 \nPage 23 of 27
Item # 20
authorization level of $250 million per year, and provide
This would be accomplished through several changes, including increasing the previously mentioned
$200,000 funding limit per project to $500,000, while providing the EPA the discretion to raise the limit
to $650,000 if necessary, and providing for the creation of multipurpose grants, allowing local
governments to obtain up to $950,000 to do site inventory, assessments, planning, or
more brownfields sites.
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Support
Protection Agency’s brownfields program, including at least $90 million for the Section 104(k)
competitive grant program. Support
brownfields program.
NOTES:
Page 19
authorization level of $250 million per year, and provide greater flexibility and fix issues in current law.
This would be accomplished through several changes, including increasing the previously mentioned
$200,000 funding limit per project to $500,000, while providing the EPA the discretion to raise the limit
and providing for the creation of multipurpose grants, allowing local
governments to obtain up to $950,000 to do site inventory, assessments, planning, or cleanup
Support continued adequate annual funding for the Environmental
rownfields program, including at least $90 million for the Section 104(k)
Support legislation to reauthorize the Environmental Protection Agency’s
greater flexibility and fix issues in current law.
This would be accomplished through several changes, including increasing the previously mentioned
$200,000 funding limit per project to $500,000, while providing the EPA the discretion to raise the limit
and providing for the creation of multipurpose grants, allowing local
cleanup for one or
Environmental
rownfields program, including at least $90 million for the Section 104(k)
legislation to reauthorize the Environmental Protection Agency’s
Attachment number 1 \nPage 24 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Land and Water Conservation Fund
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
Conservation Fund (LWCF) Act of 1965 was enacted to help preserve, develop, and assure
outdoor recreation facilities for our nation. The law created the Land and Water Conservation Fund in the
U.S. Treasury as a funding source to implement outdoor recreation goals.
The LWCF has been the principal source of monies for land acquisi
Federal agencies—the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service,
and Forest Service. The LWCF also funds a matching grant program via the National Park Service to
assist states (and local governments as sub
outdoor recreational facilities. A portion of the appropriation is divided equally among the states, with
the remainder apportioned based on need, as determined by the Secreta
award their grant money through a competitive selection process based on statewide recreation plans and
establish their own priorities and criteria. Finally, beginning in Fiscal Year (FY) 1998, LWCF has been
used to fund other federal programs with related purposes.
The LWCF is authorized at $900 million annually. While the fund accrues revenues and collections from
multiple sources, nearly all of the revenues are derived from oil and gas leasing in the Outer Continental
Shelf. Congress determines the level of appropriations each year, and yearly appropriations have
fluctuated widely since the origin of the program.
Of the total revenues that have accrued throughout the history of the program ($33.5 billion), less than
half have been appropriated ($15.8 billion). FY 2001 marked the highest funding ever, with
appropriations exceeding the authorized level by reaching nearly $1 billion. In FY 2002, Congress
provided the most LWCF funding of the past twenty years for the sta
However, this has trended downward over the past decade. For FY 2011, the appropriation was $300.5
million. Within the FY 2011 appropriation, $177 was provided for land acquisition, $40 million for the
state grant program, and $84 million for other programs. In FY 2012, Congress provided $45 million for
the state grant program. Florida received nearly
Clearwater. Congress funded the state grants program
about 5 percent due to sequestration to
likely be reduced by about 5 percent
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Support
Conservation Fund, including at least $100 million for the state grant program.
NOTES:
Page 20
Land and Water Conservation Fund
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: The Land and Water
Conservation Fund (LWCF) Act of 1965 was enacted to help preserve, develop, and assure
outdoor recreation facilities for our nation. The law created the Land and Water Conservation Fund in the
U.S. Treasury as a funding source to implement outdoor recreation goals.
The LWCF has been the principal source of monies for land acquisition for outdoor recreation by four
the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service,
and Forest Service. The LWCF also funds a matching grant program via the National Park Service to
l governments as sub-recipients) in acquiring recreational lands and developing
outdoor recreational facilities. A portion of the appropriation is divided equally among the states, with
the remainder apportioned based on need, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior. The states
award their grant money through a competitive selection process based on statewide recreation plans and
establish their own priorities and criteria. Finally, beginning in Fiscal Year (FY) 1998, LWCF has been
her federal programs with related purposes.
The LWCF is authorized at $900 million annually. While the fund accrues revenues and collections from
multiple sources, nearly all of the revenues are derived from oil and gas leasing in the Outer Continental
helf. Congress determines the level of appropriations each year, and yearly appropriations have
fluctuated widely since the origin of the program.
Of the total revenues that have accrued throughout the history of the program ($33.5 billion), less than
lf have been appropriated ($15.8 billion). FY 2001 marked the highest funding ever, with
appropriations exceeding the authorized level by reaching nearly $1 billion. In FY 2002, Congress
provided the most LWCF funding of the past twenty years for the state grant program: $144 million.
However, this has trended downward over the past decade. For FY 2011, the appropriation was $300.5
million. Within the FY 2011 appropriation, $177 was provided for land acquisition, $40 million for the
, and $84 million for other programs. In FY 2012, Congress provided $45 million for
received nearly $2 million to provide to applicants like the City of
the state grants program for FY 2013 at FY 2012 levels with a reduction of
sequestration to about $42.75 million, so the amount Florida will receive will
percent as well.
Support a $900 million annual appropriation from the Land and Water
Conservation Fund, including at least $100 million for the state grant program.
: The Land and Water
Conservation Fund (LWCF) Act of 1965 was enacted to help preserve, develop, and assure access to
outdoor recreation facilities for our nation. The law created the Land and Water Conservation Fund in the
tion for outdoor recreation by four
the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service,
and Forest Service. The LWCF also funds a matching grant program via the National Park Service to
recipients) in acquiring recreational lands and developing
outdoor recreational facilities. A portion of the appropriation is divided equally among the states, with
ry of the Interior. The states
award their grant money through a competitive selection process based on statewide recreation plans and
establish their own priorities and criteria. Finally, beginning in Fiscal Year (FY) 1998, LWCF has been
The LWCF is authorized at $900 million annually. While the fund accrues revenues and collections from
multiple sources, nearly all of the revenues are derived from oil and gas leasing in the Outer Continental
helf. Congress determines the level of appropriations each year, and yearly appropriations have
Of the total revenues that have accrued throughout the history of the program ($33.5 billion), less than
lf have been appropriated ($15.8 billion). FY 2001 marked the highest funding ever, with
appropriations exceeding the authorized level by reaching nearly $1 billion. In FY 2002, Congress
te grant program: $144 million.
However, this has trended downward over the past decade. For FY 2011, the appropriation was $300.5
million. Within the FY 2011 appropriation, $177 was provided for land acquisition, $40 million for the
, and $84 million for other programs. In FY 2012, Congress provided $45 million for
to provide to applicants like the City of
with a reduction of
, so the amount Florida will receive will
rom the Land and Water
Attachment number 1 \nPage 25 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: Public Pension Reform
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
Public Employee Pension Transparency Act
public pensions are significantly underfunded and are aiming to ensure what, in their opinion, will be
more realistic asset projections compared with expected liabilities.
Specifically, the legislation would require additional reporting of assets and liabilities and more
significantly, require that assets in a public plan such as the
projected to grow at the rate of Treasury securities in
stock market indices, thereby greatly increasing plan liabilities. This might require projected growth rates
of less than 1 percent annually instead of growth rates of 7.75 percent, which is what the F
Retirement System used between 2009 and 2011. The legislation would also disallow any future federal
bailout of public pension plans, and
disclosure requirements of the bill by removing t
the legislation would likely make local government participation in
would also aim to make them more secure.
In 2012, Sen. Orrin Hatch (UT), the Ranking Member
saying that public pension debt “threatens America” and that “defined benefit pension plans are
inappropriate for state and local governments.” He concluded his report by stating his intention to
introduce a legislative solution in the future.
Rep. Nunes has begun to seek cosponsors for this legislation in the 113
it will also be reintroduced in the Senate.
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Monitor
Public Employee Pension Transparency Act
Pension Fund.
NOTES:
Page 21
: Public Pension Reform
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: The sponsors of the
Transparency Act (Rep. Nunes of CA and Sen. Burr of NC), have stated that
public pensions are significantly underfunded and are aiming to ensure what, in their opinion, will be
more realistic asset projections compared with expected liabilities.
pecifically, the legislation would require additional reporting of assets and liabilities and more
significantly, require that assets in a public plan such as the Clearwater Employees Pension Fund
projected to grow at the rate of Treasury securities instead of more optimistic projections tied to historic
stock market indices, thereby greatly increasing plan liabilities. This might require projected growth rates
of less than 1 percent annually instead of growth rates of 7.75 percent, which is what the F
Retirement System used between 2009 and 2011. The legislation would also disallow any future federal
, and would penalize local governments that do not comply with the
disclosure requirements of the bill by removing the tax-exemption on their bonding authority.
local government participation in pension plans more
would also aim to make them more secure.
. Orrin Hatch (UT), the Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee, released a report
saying that public pension debt “threatens America” and that “defined benefit pension plans are
inappropriate for state and local governments.” He concluded his report by stating his intention to
e a legislative solution in the future.
Rep. Nunes has begun to seek cosponsors for this legislation in the 113th Congress, and it is expected that
it will also be reintroduced in the Senate.
Monitor federal legislative proposals related to public pensions
Public Employee Pension Transparency Act) which could significantly impact the Clearwater Employees
The sponsors of the
, have stated that
public pensions are significantly underfunded and are aiming to ensure what, in their opinion, will be
pecifically, the legislation would require additional reporting of assets and liabilities and more
Clearwater Employees Pension Fund are
stead of more optimistic projections tied to historic
stock market indices, thereby greatly increasing plan liabilities. This might require projected growth rates
of less than 1 percent annually instead of growth rates of 7.75 percent, which is what the Florida
Retirement System used between 2009 and 2011. The legislation would also disallow any future federal
comply with the
exemption on their bonding authority. Ultimately,
expensive, yet it
of the Senate Finance Committee, released a report
saying that public pension debt “threatens America” and that “defined benefit pension plans are
inappropriate for state and local governments.” He concluded his report by stating his intention to
Congress, and it is expected that
elated to public pensions (e.g., the
Clearwater Employees
Attachment number 1 \nPage 26 of 27
Item # 20
FEDERAL ISSUE: National Flood Insurance Program
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT
passed, and the President signed a 5
that attempts to restore the program to firmer financial footing by making
program that are likely to impact the C
In 1968, Congress established the NFIP to address the nation’s flood exposure and challenges inherent in
financing and managing flood risks in the private sector. Private
that the flood peril was uninsurable and, therefore, could not be underwritten in the private insurance
market. A three-prong floodplain management and insurance program was created to (1) identify areas
across the nation most at risk of flooding; (2) minimize the economic impact of flooding events through
floodplain management ordinances; and (3) provide flood insurance to individuals and businesses.
Until 2005, the NFIP was self-supporting as policy premiums and
payments. Today, the program is in roughly $25 billion in debt due to a number of large storms, the most
recent being Sandy.
The biggest threats to the solvency of the NFIP are generally thought to be inadequate pricing of
risks, repetitive loss properties, and the lack of enforcement of mandatory flood insurance purchase
requirements. The 2012 reauthorization takes steps to address the first two of these items.
· Requires the following pre-
true risk of flooding):
o non-primary residences
o severe repetitive loss properties
o any properties where flood losses have exceeded the property value
o any business property
o any property that has sustained substant
value) or substantial improvement
o resold property
· Allows FEMA to increase premiums by
percent cap on annual increases
These changes, along with others, are likely to make flood insurance significantly more expensive for
many residents of Clearwater who live in established flood plains. The Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) is in the midst of implementing
work with FEMA and Congress to better understand th
FEMA implements the legislation.
RECOMMENDED POSITION: Monitor
Flood Insurance Program. Monitor
the City of Clearwater.
Page 22
National Flood Insurance Program
BACKGROUND; HOW IT MAY AFFECT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER: In mid-2012, Congress
passed, and the President signed a 5-year reauthorization of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
that attempts to restore the program to firmer financial footing by making a number of changes to the
program that are likely to impact the City’s residents.
In 1968, Congress established the NFIP to address the nation’s flood exposure and challenges inherent in
financing and managing flood risks in the private sector. Private insurance companies at the time claimed
that the flood peril was uninsurable and, therefore, could not be underwritten in the private insurance
prong floodplain management and insurance program was created to (1) identify areas
nation most at risk of flooding; (2) minimize the economic impact of flooding events through
floodplain management ordinances; and (3) provide flood insurance to individuals and businesses.
supporting as policy premiums and fees covered expenses and claim
payments. Today, the program is in roughly $25 billion in debt due to a number of large storms, the most
The biggest threats to the solvency of the NFIP are generally thought to be inadequate pricing of
risks, repetitive loss properties, and the lack of enforcement of mandatory flood insurance purchase
requirements. The 2012 reauthorization takes steps to address the first two of these items.
-FIRM properties to pay actuarial insurance rates (rates that reflect the
primary residences
severe repetitive loss properties
any properties where flood losses have exceeded the property value
any business property
any property that has sustained substantial damage (more than 50 percent of fair market
or substantial improvement (more than 30 percent of fair market value)
Allows FEMA to increase premiums by 20 percent per year, an increase from the current 10
reases
These changes, along with others, are likely to make flood insurance significantly more expensive for
who live in established flood plains. The Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) is in the midst of implementing the reauthorization legislation. The Ci
work with FEMA and Congress to better understand the future cost of flood insurance to City residents
Monitor FEMA’s implementation of the reauthorization of the National
Monitor changes to flood insurance rates for homeowners and businesses in
2012, Congress
year reauthorization of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
a number of changes to the
In 1968, Congress established the NFIP to address the nation’s flood exposure and challenges inherent in
insurance companies at the time claimed
that the flood peril was uninsurable and, therefore, could not be underwritten in the private insurance
prong floodplain management and insurance program was created to (1) identify areas
nation most at risk of flooding; (2) minimize the economic impact of flooding events through
floodplain management ordinances; and (3) provide flood insurance to individuals and businesses.
fees covered expenses and claim
payments. Today, the program is in roughly $25 billion in debt due to a number of large storms, the most
The biggest threats to the solvency of the NFIP are generally thought to be inadequate pricing of flood
risks, repetitive loss properties, and the lack of enforcement of mandatory flood insurance purchase
requirements. The 2012 reauthorization takes steps to address the first two of these items.
rates (rates that reflect the
(more than 50 percent of fair market
(more than 30 percent of fair market value)
percent per year, an increase from the current 10
These changes, along with others, are likely to make flood insurance significantly more expensive for
who live in established flood plains. The Federal Emergency Management
ity may need to
to City residents as
FEMA’s implementation of the reauthorization of the National
changes to flood insurance rates for homeowners and businesses in
Attachment number 1 \nPage 27 of 27
Item # 20
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Ordinance 8383-13 on second reading, vacating that certain 40-foot platted right-of-way abutting and lying east of Lots 4, 5, 6,
14, 15, 16, 17 and 18, dedicated and described in the Plat titled “Elysium – Phase 1” as recorded in Plat Book 93, Pages 41-46, public
records of Pinellas County, Florida, subject to conditions.
SUMMARY:
Review Approval:
Cover Memo
Item # 21
Ordinance No. 8383-13
ORDINANCE NO. 8383-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA, VACATING THAT CERTAIN 40-FOOT PLATTED
RIGHT-OF-WAY, ABUTTING AND LYING EAST OF LOTS 4,
5, 6, 14, 15, 16, 17 AND 18, DEDICATED AND DESCRIBED
IN THE PLAT TITLED “ELYSIUM – PHASE 1” AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 93, PAGES 41-46, PUBLIC
RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUBJECT
TO CONDITIONS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Rhonda B. Harms; Karsten Jacoby; Thomas G. and Karen L. Hackett;
Phyllis D. Perron; Kerry B. Meyer; Laura D. Irion; Kevin E. Dunbar; and Mark A. and
Deeann Kerrutt owners of real property located in the City of Clearwater (the “City”), have
collectively requested that the City vacate the right-of-way depicted in Exhibit “A” attached
hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that said right-of-way is not necessary for
municipal use and it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City and the general public
that the same be vacated; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The following:
That certain 40-foot platted right-of-way, abutting and lying East of Lots 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 16,
17 and 18, dedicated and described in the plat titled “Elysium – Phase 1” as recorded in
Plat Book 93, Pages 41-46, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more
particularly described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated by reference
hereof, is hereby vacated, closed and released, and the City releases all of its right, title
and interest thereto, contingent upon the following conditions:
1. The City hereby retains a drainage and utility easement over the described
property for the installation and maintenance of any and all utilities thereon
by the City of Clearwater, Bright House and/or Knology consistent with any
vested rights of occupation in existence on the Effective Date of this
ordinance, including any rights vested under any valid franchise agreement
between each private utility and the City; and
2. All property owners abutting the west boundary of the right-of-way vacated
hereby shall individually grant Progress Energy distribution easements, the
location and terms of which are acceptable to Progress Energy.
Collectively, Progress Energy’s easement rights shall encompass the
property described herein. This vacation ordinance shall be null and void if
this condition is not met within forty-five (45) calendar days from the
adoption of this ordinance.
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1 of 2
Item # 21
Ordinance No. 8383-13
Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public records of
Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING _________________________
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED _________________________
_______________________________
George N. Cretokos
Mayor
Approved as to form: Attest:
______________________________ _______________________________
Camilo A. Soto Rosemarie Call
Assistant City Attorney City Clerk
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2 of 2
Item # 21
ELYSIUM - PHASE 1
Plat Book 93, Page 45
ELYSIUM - PHASE 1
Plat Book 93, Page 45
Legal Description
A Right-of-Way vacation described as follows:
The 40' platted right-of-way, abutting and lying East of Lots 4, 5, 6,
14, 15, 16, 17 and 18, dedicated and described in the plat titled
"Elysium - Phase 1" as recorded in Plat Book 93, Pages 41-46,
Pinellas County Public Records, Florida.
Attachment number 2 \nPage 1 of 1
Item # 21
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
City Manager Verbal Reports
SUMMARY:
Review Approval:
Cover Memo
Item # 22
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Service Awards
SUMMARY:
5 Years of Service
John Pittman Solid Waste
Michael Hasty Police
Margaret Hasty Police
10 Years of Service
Felicia Leonard Parks and Recreation
Louis Beem Solid Waste
Kelly Hollinger Finance
Michael Olsa Public Utilities
15 Years of Service
Georgia Calder Parks and Recreation
20 Years of Service
James Charon Public Utilities
Ramon Cosme Police
Ethridge Hall Police
Joyce Kirchoffer Library
25 Years of Service
Larry Roberts Engineering/Stormwater
William New Public Utilities
Review Approval:
Cover Memo
Item # 23
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Child Abuse Prevention Month Proclamation - Mike Carroll, SunCoast Regional Director of the Department of Children and Families.
SUMMARY:
Review Approval:
Cover Memo
Item # 24
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Arbor Day Proclamation - Chuck Porthouse, Parks and Rec.
SUMMARY:
Review Approval:
Cover Memo
Item # 25
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Clearwater Fire and Rescue Local 1158 Appreciation Month Proclamation - Lt. Patrick Conrey with Clearwater Fire and Rescue
SUMMARY:
Review Approval:
Cover Memo
Item # 26
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
National Crime Victims Week Proclamation - Yolanda Cowart, Founder of the Springtime Club
SUMMARY:
Review Approval:
Cover Memo
Item # 27
Work Session
Council Chambers - City Hall
Meeting Date:4/15/2013
SUBJECT / RECOMMENDATION:
Pinellas County Economic Development Presentation - Mike Meidel, Dir. Pinellas County
SUMMARY:
Review Approval:
Cover Memo
Item # 28