The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2013-07025July 10, 2013 Mr. Matt Jackson City of Clearwater Planning and Development 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 2855 GULF TO FLS2013-07025 1 Bayview Gardens Zoning: Commercial BAY BLVD Atlas #: 300B RE: FLS2013-07025- 2855 Gulf to Bay Boulevard — Response to Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Jackson: �� Cardno TBE Cardno TBE 380 Park Place Blvd Suite 300 Clearwater, FL 33759 USA Phone 727 537 3505 Phone 800 861 8314 Fax 727 5391294 Email tbe@CardnoTBE.com www.CardnoTBE.com Please find below responses to the Planning Staffs comments associated with the Incompiete Letter for FLS2013-07025 issued July 2, 2013. 1. The survey includes all required information but is very difficult to read due to the amount of line work. As such, staff suggests breaking the survey into at least two documents with one not containing the elevation and grading information. RESPONSE: A revised survey has been provided as requested. 2. On the detailed site plan sheets, provide the width dimensions of the access driveway from Gulf to Bay. RESPONSE: Dimensions have been provided as requested. 3. Either remove all references to outdoor lighting, or submit a dimensioned photometric plan showing the distance from the proposed pole lights adjacent to property lines as well as foot candle measurements along and across the property lines. RESPONSE: Per 07/05/13 phone conversation with Matt Jackson, we will add the footcandle light levels to the legend on sheets L6-06-A & B. 4. On the detailed site plan sheets, provide the adjacent right of way centerlines and widths as well as street light poles, bus shelters, signage and utility company facilities as applicable. RESPONSE: Requested items have been added to detail sheets. 5. Provide the method of solid waste disposal and if dumpsters are to be used, the location and design of dumpster enclosure and Code required screening. RESPONSE: Solid waste facility and the enclosure requirements have been added. 6. With regard to the tree inventory, there needs to be a consolidated list. The tree inventory on Sheets L6- 02-A and L6-02-B is difficult to read and there no inventory list was provided. Contact Matt Anderson at 562-4558 with any questions on the inventory or tree survey requirements. RESPONSE: Tree inventory sheets have been added (L6-01-C through L6-01-H). Page 1 of 2 Mr. Matt Jackson FLS2013-07025- 2855 Gulf to Bay Boulevard July 10, 2013 7. There are a number of plants on Sheet L6-07-A that have a quantity of zero. Either provide the quantities or remove them from the list. RESPONSE: Plants with quantities of 0 have been removed. 8. On Sheets L6-04-A and L6-04-B, show the existing trees to remain including type, size and drip line. RESPONSE: Existing trees to be saved have been added to sheets L6-04-A 8� B. 9. Provide the area of each of the landscape islands. RESPONSE: Areas of islands have been added to sheets L6-04-F & G. 10. Provide the width of all landscape islands. RESPONSE: Widths of islands have been added to sheets L6-04-F 8� G. 11. Show the required sight visibility triangles at the Gulf to Bay entrance on both the landscape and site plans. RESPONSE: Required site visibility triangles have been added to the landscape plans and site plans. 12. Either provide the required perimeter buffer landscaping along the southeast property line, or request removal of this requirement through the comprehensive landscape plan application. RESPONSE: Buffer has been added along the southeast property line. Note that 7 selected trees were removed from the buffer along the east property line as these are wooded areas (see newly added L6-04-D & E for aerial photographic information. Shrubs/trees that are located in water were also removed. 13. Revised plans are due by noon on 07/11/13. It is the responsibility of the applicant to collate the plans into the submitted sets. RESPONSE: Acknowledged. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727.431.1605 or marc.mariano@cardno.com Sincerely, Marc A. Mariano, AICP Assistant Director of Site Development Page 2 of 2 ° lear�vater �C U Planning & Development Department Flexible Standard Development Application Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELYAND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTCODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $475 PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: BVG Acquisition Inc. Att: Santa Fe Senior Living 4300 NW 89th Blvd, Gainesville, FL 32606-5688 352.337.8671 EMAIL: Troy.Hart@avmed.org Anthony Everett—AB/PSREG Bayview Venture, L.L.C. a Delaware limited liability company, AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: an affiliate of Pollack Shores Real Estate Group MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: EMAIL: ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5005 Interbay Blvd, Tampa, 33611 813.902.9179 aeverett theeverettcompanv com _ 2855 Gulf to Bay Blvd PARCEL NUMBER(S): 17/29/16/03006/000/0200 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See survey included in this application package PROPOSED USE(S): 426 Multifamily Residential Units with ancillary club house uses and resident/visitor parking DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Flexible Standard Development Approval to redevelop a 37.55 acre portion of a 40.07 acre 5pecifcally identify the request existing senior apartment complex in the MHDR and O Zoning Districts with 426 (include all requested code flexibility,• multifamily residential units in 12 individual buildings. A maximum building height of 49.84 e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height setbacks, lot feet is proposed in accordance with the Flexible Standard Development parameters and size, lot width, specifc use, etc.): minimum lot area, lot width, setbacks and off street parking all conform with the MHDR's Minimum Standard Development parameters for attached dwellings. An enhanced landscape package is also included with this application as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program (Sect3-1202G) Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01/12 ° lea�water �� U Planning & Development Department Flexible Standard Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): SITE AREA: 1,745,449 sq. ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: 254,829 sq. ft. Proposed: 572,155 sq. ft. Maximum Allowable: 689,598 sq. ft. MHDR (37.21 AC), O(0.34 AC) and C(2.52 AC) RM (28.55AC), R/OG (0.34AC), CG (2.52AC) and Water (8.66AC) Multifamily (MHDR & O Zoning) and 94 ALF (C Zoning) 426 Multifamily Units (no existing uses to remain) 40.07 acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses): First use: 542,080 sq. ft. Multifamily Second use: 15,444 sq. ft. Accessory (Leasing, Clubhouse, Pavilion, Mailroom) Third use: 14,631 sq. ft. Individual Garages FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: 245,829 SF / 1,368,219 = 0.179 (17.9%) Proposed: 572,155 SF / 1,368,219 = 0.418 (41.8) Maximum Allowable: 689,598 SF (MHDR/O = 0.50 FAR and C= 0.55 FAR) BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1�` floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: 189.814 sq. ft. (_ 14.38 % of site) Proposed: 198,302 sq. ft. ( 11.36 / of site) Maximum Permitted: N/A sq. ft. ( N/A � of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: 20,019 sq. ft. ( 1.14 % of site) Proposed: 44,507 sq. ft. ( 3.25 % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: 205.152 sq. ft. (_ 14.9 % of site) Proposed: 341,430 sq. ft. ( 24.9 � of site) Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 01/12 IMPERVlOUS SURFACE RATIO (totai square footage of impervious areas divided by tiie fotal square footege ot entire site): Existing: 517.800 SF ! 1,368,219 = 0.37$ (37.890) Proposed: 644,841 /1,368,219 = 0.471(47.1%) Maximum Permttted: 689.598 SF �MHDR/O = 0.75 FAR and C= 0.90 FAR) DENSITY {units, rooms or beds per acre): BUILDING HEIGHT: Existing• 8.4 DUA (229 MF Units & 94 ALF Beds) Existing: 30 feet MHDR & 91 feet C Proposed: 14J4 OUA (426 MF Units 128.89AC of RM & ROG) Proposed: 49.85 feet Maximum Permittedc 433 MF Units (15 DUA * 28.89AC} Maximum Permitted: 3U - 50 feet OFF-STREET PARKING: fxisting: 307 Spaces Noie: A parking demand study must 6e provided tn conjunction with any request Proposed: 85Z Snaces to reduce the amount of required off-street parking spaces. Please see the Minimum Required: 2 spaces/unit or 852 Spaces °�dopted Parking Demand Study Guideirnesforfurtherinfarmation. WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VAtU€ OF TH€ PROJECT UPON COMPLETIQN? $$32,000,0�0 ZONING DISTR14T5 FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: Commercial South: N/A - Water/ Tampa Bay East: MDR & Commercial West: MHOR Institutional & Mobile Home Park 5TATEOFFLORfUA,COUNTY�FPINELLAS .�-7 /�� I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Swor' n to and subscribed before me this G—U� day of representations made in this application are true and u 20 � 3 . to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the �• 112!" who is personally known has property d�cr�bed in this a�tion. � � produced ► G-cc'n � asidentification. � � MJ41MLE1r 5ignature o property owner or representative otary publie, �. .�`Y �1C - SWe.o1 Flori�� MY �oa�m,.Expin:Oct Et, 201! My commission expires: �' n�; " �� Pfanning & Development Deparlment, 100 S. Myrt(e Avenue, Ciearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-458T; Fax: 727-562-48B5 Page 3 of 8 Re�ised 01/92 IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT (FLS) APPLICATION, ALL FLS APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: � Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Standard Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shail be used to provide these responses. � Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Standard Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. � A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the properry, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of ail public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. N/A If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. N/q If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other si milar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. � A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer, certified planner or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: � Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. [�] North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. N/A Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. � Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. � Location, footprint, size and height of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. � Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points of access. �{ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, gutters, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains; manholes, inlets, lift stations, fire hydrants, underground conduits, seawalls and any proposed utility easements. � Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities, including offsite elevations, as may be required by the Engineering Department to evaluate proposed stormwater management, as well as a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. � Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibilityfor collection. � Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406. � Location, type and lamp height of all outdoor lighting fixtures. N�q Location of all existing and proposed attached and freestanding signage. Sign Plans to be submitted as separate application �] All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections, street light poles, bus sheiters, signage and utility company facilities. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tei: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01/12 [�%] Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. � Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height, building materials, and concealment of all mechanicai equipment located on the roof. � Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. �f] Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. N/A If there is any requested deviation to the parking standards a parking demand study will need to be provided. Prior to the preparation of such study, the methodology shall be approved by the Planning and Engineering Departments. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. � Tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees; as weil as a tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying those trees proposed to be removed, if any. � A traffic impact study shall be required for any development which may degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recen t edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. (�] An application for a certificate of concurrency/capacity or a nonconcurrency affidavit. No development approval shal� be granted until a certificate of concurrency/capacity is issued or a nonconcurrency affidavit is executed. � A landscape ., �...,.. ,. ,.... :. .� ,.,. . ,�� -., _•.,.- ".. ... „�..� r.. e or a change of use; or an exi sting use is improved or remodele GOMPREHEN$IV,E LAND.SCAPE PRO.GRAM AP.PLICATIQN I structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current reco S,UBMITTEDAS:PARTOFTHISDEV.ELOPMENT.REQUEST. ed site plan; or a parking lot requires a dditional landscaping . ' ape plan shall include the following information , if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval: [y� Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. � Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line. � Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs, and ground cover plants, including planting instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching, staking and protective measures. � Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. � Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, sign locations, curbs, gutters, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, manhoies, inlets, lift stations, fire hydrants, underground conduits, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape. � Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. � Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations, and drainage structures and other drainage improvements. � All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections, street light poles, bus shelters, signage and utility company facilities. �! Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any. � An irrigation plan. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-0865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 01/12 ° lear�ater � V Planning & Development Department Flexible Standard Development Application � General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Generally the proposed 3 and 4 story buildings will be of a similar scale and intensity with the surrounding properties and of a lesser height than the existing 8 story assisted living facility tower currently located within the campus. The proposed buildinqs will be in direct harmony with the adjacent 2 story rehabilitation facility, on a separate parcel but within the campus. To limit any impact on the single family residential use to the east and mobile homes to the west, the taller 4 stories buildings have been located within the southern portion of the site which is at a much lower elevation due to site grades to limit visual impact. In additional a generous landscape package is also proposed and as part of numerous design iterafions with the project arborist a substantiai number of existing mature trees have been preserved to not only buffer the proposed multifamily buifdings from all adjacent uses, but to maintain the areas aesthetic and natural quality, which is paramount to the character of the area. In addition, only a 1 story club house is located in close proximity to the adjacent single family use the east. These consciences design techniques incorporated into the proposed development have ensured a limited impact on the natural vitality and character of the area. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The existing campus consists of an 8-story assisted living facility, approximately 62 residential dwellings and ancillary uses that were constructed in the mid-1960's and as such are approaching the practical life span of buildings of this nature. replacement of these structures with an amenity-rich, state-of- the-a�t development that incorporates high quality building and landscape architectural features and design will not only enhance the visual quality for the adjoining property owners, but will without question positively impact property values in the general vicinity. As identified in the landscape and building elevation plans the architectural details and embellishments, as well as the handsome landscape package used to enhance all of the buildings and property boundaries, ensures that the proposed development will surely enhance the value of and encourage redevelopment, if desired, for the adjoining property owners. Additionally, while many of the properties in this area are commercial in nature, the influx of new residents will produce an economic boost for these commercial entities. Finally, the adjoining residential uses to the east and west of the property will be buffered by attractive fencing and the existing mature vegetation, as well as enhanced by the proposed supplemental landscaping to ensure the privacy of all parties. Again, as identified above the layout of this site allows consistent development types to be located in close proximity to each other. As such, no deleterious impact on any of the adjoining property owners is anticipated. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The health safetv and welfare of residents and persons in the area will be qreativ improved as a result of this application due to 1.) the removal of dated dwellin4 units• 21 the inclusion of a stormwater manaqement svstem that meets current Local Reqional and State criteria� 3) the certification or replacement of the existinq bridqes on site to confirm that the structures can supqort the 80,000 Ib. weiqht limit required by the Citv of Clearwater Fire and Rescue Departmenfi 4.) the upqrade of existinq sewer and water lines that are in a dilapidated state which in some locations includes crackinq, IeakinA and blocka4e• 5.) the removal of existina veaetation and trees that due to poor conditions mav create a safetv hazard to the residents and visitors of the site� 6.) the inclusion of a upqradetl ADA desiqn compliant sidewalk throuqhout the campus that will allow for safe and efficient pedestrian circulation throuqh the site and out to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd� 7.) the conformity of all site and buildinq desiqn requirements included in the Clearwater Fire Protection Desian and Construction Guidelines� 8.1 the use of fencina seciutlinq landscapina and a Qated roadwav svstem to ensure the arivacv of residents and adioininq propertv owners as well as the safetv and securitv of residents on site; and 9.1 the uparade to site liQhtinp throuph the use of new, decorative Planning & Development Deparbnent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562�+L865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01112 ° l�ar�ater �C Planning & Development Department Flexible Standard Development Application � General Applicability Criteria street li htinq and pedestrian bollards to ensure safe and effective niqhttime vehicle and pedestrian travel throuqh the site. The proposed development will have no adverse impact on the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working on-site or in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. To help reduce traffic congestion the proposed development will maintain the two entry/exit points to the site. This will assist in helping to efficiently disperse traffic to the Gulf to Bay Boulevard a major arterial In adtlition the site provides direct side street access to the Clearwater Mall, a regional shopping center Finally the site includes pedestrian access to the transit options along Gulf to Bay as well as the Greyhound Bus Station. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed development will actually be an enhancement to the character of this immediate vicinity in that all of the proposed buildings will incorporate a modern architectural desi n that is will be an im rovement over the current uses on site. This will be done in a manner that will not overwhelm the existinq neiqhborhood fabric as the scale of the proposed development will be subsumed by the preservation of numerous existing mature trees and enhanced by the inclusion of new landscaping features The increased height while of lesser height than the existing ALF building that has existed for over 40 years without any deleterious impact on surroundinq property owners will allow the area's primary amenitV its natural beauty, to be preserved and enjoyed by the residents and adjoining property owners for years to come. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Numerous techniques have been incorporated into the overridinq desiqn of the project to limit any deleterious impacts to the adjoininq property owners, as well as the residents of the tlevelopment The primarV desiqn feature that will minimize all of the above listed impacts will be the use of omamental fencinq around the entire property boundary in areas where the proposed development site abuts a residential use. The bufferinq capabilities of this_ ornamental fence will be enhanced throuqh the use of shrubs and trees to dampen any visual and acoustical impacts that may occur from the proposed development which is minimal but also decrease visual and acoustical impacts on the proposed residents from the adioininq propertv owners such as the rehabilitation facility and the fire station Additionally the implementation of an environmentally conscious buildinq layout has afforded the preservation of numerous mature trees on site which provide a natural visual and acoustical buffer for the adjoining property owners and minimizes the developments impact on the natural environment As the proposed development is residential there is no impact anticipated due to atypical hours of operation. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01/12 o Planning & Development Department � C earwater Flexible Standard DevelopmentApplication � Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). 1. 6.1. Reduction in rear setback — The project meets the Minimum Standard for rear setback. As such, no reduction to the rear setback is requested. 6.2. Increase in Height — The height increase will allow the proposed development to achieve a viable density count through the use of smaller building footprints that allow for the preservation of numerous existinq mature trees on site which helps protect the natural beautv of this area that has existed for decades The heiqht increase creates a project that recoqnizes the importance of the natural environment and incorporates that natural beauty into the plans throuqh the developments amenity packaqe and hiqhly landscaped open and resident qatherinq spaces The requested heiqhts do not exceed 50 feet antl the tallest buildings are actually located in the lower portion of the site (outside of the floodplain) to help maintain views for other building and properties. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land zoned LDR, as there are no LDR zoned properties in close proximity to the project. 3, B.3. LDR Zoning Encroachment - As indicated, there are no LDR zoned properties adjacent to or in close proximity to the project. 6.4. Screening of Off-street Parking — As identified in the landscape package, the project includes a mix of enhanced site buffering along all parcel lines through the utilization of existing mature vegetation, new landscape stock and a 6-foot high ornamental fence. These provisions will not only buffer the adjacent uses from the proposed development, but will also buffer the proposed development from the adjacent uses. 5. 6.5. Waste Disposal Containers Which Serve Proposed Overnight Accommodations — Overnight Accommodations are not a proposed use in the development. Planning 8� Development Department, 700 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 8 of 8 Revlsed 01/12 May 14, 2013 Pollack Shores Development, LLC c/o Anthony M. Everett Director-Central Flo[ida 50051nterbay Bivd. Tampa, FL 33611 RE: Permits for a 425 unit apartment community to be constructed on the old Bayview Gardens property generally described at 2855 Gulf to Bay eoulevard, Clearwater, Florida ("Subject Property") and more particularly described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "A". To Whom It May Concern: This letter shall constitute the Owner's authorization for Pollack Partners, LLC (including any affiliate or related company of Pollack Shores Development, LLC) (collectively, Pollack Partners} to act as Owner's agent to sign, file applications and apply with the appropriate governmental entities to obtain necessary approvals, permits and any necessary amendments for construction of a 4Y5 unit apartment community on the property described in Exhibit A, including without (imitation, City of Clearwater development approval, Southwest Florida Water Management ,. „ District (SWfWMD) permits, Army Carps of Engineers permits, Florida Department of Transportation permits, Water and Navigatlon Authority approval, the City of Clearwater and/or Pineilas County Development Orders, permits, and utility approvals. Sincerely, Owner (sj Rv� errn ncannN. �rvc'. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ALACHUA " �' �� _+✓i ti' on behaU of Owner(s). The person Swom to and s�rbSScib�ed before me this� day of �,'� t,� 2013, by _ �.—� i��s known by me) (has produced as id ntification) and as such (di )(d'id not) take an oath. �1 -, \ i � i, � •,t rf J�, �, ,Q,,G,. `�,--� N ary P Ii� � P�intName� % �� Commission Expires: C� � � �}484696v1 LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC. ��s Planners May 28, 2013 Mr. Bennett Elbo Pubiic Works Administration — Traffic Operations City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 Re: Bay View Gardens Development South of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and east of Sky Harbor Drive Trip Generation Comparison Lincks Project No. 13045 Dear Mr. Elbo: The purpose of this letter is to provide the trip generation comparison between the existing and proposed land uses for the above referenced project to determine if a detailed traffic study is required. According to the City of Clearwater's Community Development Code, a detailed traffic study is not required if the proposed developmentgenerates less than 1,000 net new daity trip ends. The site in question currently contains the following land uses: • 94 Bed Assisted Living Facility (ITE Land Use Code #254) • 229 Multi-Family Dwelling Units (tTE Land Use Code #220) The proposed development will consist of the following residential land uses: • 425 Multi-Family Dwelling Units (ITE Land Use Code #220) The trip rates utilized in the analysis are based on the latest computerized version of the Online Tra�c Impact Study Software "OTISS" which utilizes the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trjp Generation, 9'h Edition, 2012, as its database. Table 1 provides the estimated daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation for the existing and proposed land uses stated above. The results show that only 938 net new daily trip ends would be generated by the proposed development, which is less than the threshold of 1,000 net new daily trip ends. Therefore, a detailed traffic study is not required. If you have any questions regarding this analysis, please contact Steve Henry or myself. Sincerely, U 8� A� TES, tNC, a �'`� w. ��, .�'� Senior Project Manager RWF/cvc Enclosures 5023 West Laurel Street Tampa, Florida 33607 813 289 0039 Telephone 813 287 0674 Telefax www.lincks.com Website Scenario Proposed Existing 1 Land Use Apartments Apartments Assisted Living TABLE 1 ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Daily Trip Ends (9) Trip Ends (1) LUC Size Triq EndS (1'� In Out Total In Out Total 220 425 DU's 2,699 42 170 212 163 88 251 220 229 DU's 1,511 23 93 116 93 51 144 254 94 Beds � 8 5 13 9 12 21 1-,�fi1 31 98 129 102 63 165 Difference 938: 11 72 83 61 25 86 (1) Source: ITE Trip Generation, 9th Ed., 2012 LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, 1 Print Preview Analysis Name: Project Name: Date: State/Province: Country: AnalysYs Name: Land Use 220 - Apartment 220 - Apartment Page 1 of 2 Daily Bayview Gardens No: 5/1I2013 City: ZiplPostal Code: Client Name: Edition: 9th Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total , ___ _. _ . � �. . . __ _ __ — _-- 1349 1350 2699 � - Dwelling Units ^_� 425 (^'.-----Weekday ��_ y Best Fit (LIN) R_� Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction �°!0 1349 �% Adjusted Exit 1350 h Weekday Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 220 - Apartment ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by% for this case. Total Entering Total Exiting Total Entering Reduction Total Exiting Reduction Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction Total Entering Pass-by Reduction :tps://otisstraffic. com/proj ectstudy/printpreview?guid=d84fdd88e27b8 e32e5 cd7fc23 d43 5 5 fb 1349 1350 0 0 0 0 0 5/20/2013 Print Preview Total Exiting Pass-by Reduction Yotal Entering Non-Pass•by Trips Total Exiting Non-Pass-by Trlps 1349 1354 Page 2 of 2 https://otisstraffiacarnfprojectstudy/printpreview?guid=d84fdd88e27b8e32eScd7fc23d4355fb 5/�0l2Q13 Print Preview h Analysis Name: Project Name: Date: StatelProvince: Country: AnalysYs Name: AM Peak Hour Bayview Gardens 5/1/2013 No: City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: 9th Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method � __ � . ____.. _.__..___. � . �.._. ___.._. 220 - Apartment � Dwelling Units ,�25 Weekday, Peak Hour of � Best Fit (LIN) " -�� ^""-- Ad�acent Street Tra�c, ----�� One Hour Between 7 and 9 a. m, Page 1 of 2 Entry Exit Total 42 170 212 ,,�. _ . �IC:�OC1S. �� `� � �u��. . . :_� " � � � _ . . Land Use Entry Reciuction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 220 - Apartment p��o 42 p�o/o 170 __ _ __ ET� Devia#ion Details �.;�` Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Trafflc, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 220 - Apartment ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by% for this case. Total Entering Total Exiting Total Entering Reduction Total Exiting Reduction Total Entering lnternal Capture Reduction tps://otisstraffiacom/proj ectstudy/printpreview?guid=a91 l O 1 f5554cb6b907b87aee 1 fa97b65 42 170 0 0 0 5/20/2013 Print Preview Total Exlting Internal Capture ReductiQn Total Entering Pass-by Reduction Total Exiting Pass-by Reduction Total Entering Non-Pass-by Trtps Total Exiting Non-Pass-by Trips Page 2 of 2 42 170 https://otisstraffic.com/projectstudy/printpreview?guid=a911 O1f5554cb6b907b87aee 1fa97b65 5I20!"2U13 Print Preview Analysis Name: Project Name: Date: StatelProvince: Country: AnalysYs Name: PM Peak Hour eayview Gardens 5/1/2013 No: City: Zip/Postal Code: Client Name: Edition: 9th Page 1 of 2 Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 220 - Apartment Dwelling Units 425 Weekday, Peak Hour of Best Fit (LIN) 163 88 251 �_ ___ _._._._ , . � Ad�acent Street Traffic, �"�—"--""— �` One Hour Beiween 4 and 6 p.m. _ _ _. „,�e , .� _ 3di�Ctians � �. F b _ Land Use 220 - Apartment _ . _ __. _ __ ___. � � Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit �% 163 p�% 88 _ _...._ I7E [l�viat�an Details __, , . �� ,u., � �Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 220 - Apartment ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by% for this case. Total Entering Total Exiting Total Entering Reduction Total Exiting Reduction Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction tps://otisstraffic.com/proj ectstudy/printpreview?guid=eb924570b61673f�89a029a1 b9adce8a 163 88 0 0 0 5/20/2013 Print Preview Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction Totaf Entering Pass-by Reduction Total Exiting Pass-by Reduction Tota1 Entering Non-Pass-by Tripa Total Exiting Non-Pass-by Trips Page 2 of � 0 163 88 https://otisstraffic.com/pzojectstudy/printpreview?guid=eb924570b61673f989a029alb9adce8a 5120/2013 Print Preview Petlod Setting , . � � � � � Page 1 of 2 Analysis Name: Daily Project Name: Bayview Gardens - Existing No: Date_ 511 /2013 City: StatelProvince: ZiplPostal Code: Cou�try: Client Name: AnalysYs Name: Edition: 9th Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total . _ �....,_ 229 C Weekday Best Fit (LIN) 755 756 1511 220-Apartment (� --- �Dwelling Units ____.� 9 __._._. _ .___ _____—._ � � .... ____ _ _-- _.__ . S __ __. __ __ _ .__ _ 125 125 250 254 - Assisted Living Beds �� s Weekday ( Average � � � _ __�___ _ � � __._� ___.� l_ .e,a. .,� __ _._..._r� 220 - Apartment 254 - Assisted Living 220 - Apartment Exit 756 Entry 755 220 - Apartment Entry Exit Total 254 - Assisted Living Entry Exit Total Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry p�% 755 (�—;o�0 125 �----� Demand Exit: 0�'% (0) Demand Entry: 0�% (0) Balanced: 0 Balanced: 0 Exit Reduction �°lo a�,� Adjusted Exit 756 125 254 - Assisted Living Demand Entry: �% (0) Entry 125 Demand Exit: �% (0) Exit 125 Internal Trips Total Trips -� - �- - .-- -. � - - _- -----� Extemal Trips 254 - Assisted Living i Total [ _. _ . . _ . _ __ --. _ .—. _ _755 (100%) __ _ o (o%) - __ 0 (0%) � 755 (100%) 756 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 756 (100%) 1511 (100%) 0 (0%) � 0 (0%) 1511 {100%) Total Trips 125 (100%)� 125 (100%) 250 (100%) internal 7rips _.____ ___ _ __ __ .._� 220 - Apartment _ ._ ____ _ ___.___.__.,_._.._ 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) � Total 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) External Trips _____.__ ____---.. 125 (100%) 125 (100%) 250 (100%) https://otisstraffic.com/proj ectstudy/printpreview?guid=e 143ced2cca49d3dacc6b271902154bd 5/20/2013 Print Preview La�d Use 220 - Apartment 254 - Assisted Living External Trips 1511 250 Weekday Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from tTE. External Trips 220 - Apartment ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by% for this case, 254 - Assisted Living ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by% for this case. Total Entering Total Exiting Total Entering Reduction Total Exiting Reduction Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 7ota1 Entering Pass-by Reduction Total Exiting Pass-by Reduction Total Entering Non-Pass-by Trips Total Exiting Non-Pass-by Trips PeSS•by°/a �% �% Page 2 of Pass-by Trips Non-pass-by Trips 0 1511 0 250 880 881 0 0 0 0 0 0 880 881 2 https://otisstraffic.com/projectstudy/printpreview?guid=e143ced2cca49d3dacc6b271902154bd 5I20/2013 Print Preview Analysis Name: Projeck Name: Date: Staie/Province: Country: AnalysYs Name: Land Use 220 - Apartment 254 - Assisted Living Page 1 of 2 AM Peak Hour Bayview Gardens - Existing No: 5/1 /2013 City: ZiplPostal Code: Client Name: Edition: 9th Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total -- --_ _._ � �_��...e�._ ____ �..__ 23 93 116 Dwelling Units 229 Weekday, Peak Hour of Best Fit (LIN) ��' � ..� �� — � � Adjacent Street Traffic, � � -`� ��` One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. _ _.__----. _.. .u_. �� _. �____ --- __ _ , Beds � 9`� Weekday, Peak Hour of � Average 8 5 1 ' �� -- �-` AdjacentStreetTraffic, �� -- _� ` �� One Hour Between 7 and � � 9 a.m. Traffic Reductions Land Use 220 - Apartment 254 - Assisted Living 220 - Apartment Exit 93 Entry 23 220 - Apartment _,. _ . _.. - — Entry Exit Total 254 - Assisted Living Entry Exit Total Demand Exit: ��% (0) Demand Entry: �°Jo (0) Total Trips 23 (100%) � 93 (100%) 116 (100%) Total Trips 8 (100%) 5 (100%) 13 (100%) � Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry �% 23 �% $ Balanced: 0 Balanced: 0 Exit Reduction I� I% � � lo�a I� I Adjusted Exit 93 5 254 - Assisted Living Demand Entry: �% (0) Entry 8 Demand Exit: �% (0) Exit 5 Internal Trips __ _ . __ �_._.__. 254 - Assisted Living E _ - ___0 (0%)_._ _ _ __ 0 (0%) 0 (0%) � i Intemal Trips � �220 �- Apartment � � � _ ._-_ __. _ 0 (0%) ____�___ � _... 0 (0%) � 0 (0%) � . __ . 7otal ..�._. �� ...�. �. . 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0°/a) Total 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) Extemal Trips 23 (100%0) �� 93 (100%) 116 (100°/a) - - � External Trips � w ._ .._. _ ., __8 (100%) � 5 (100%) � 13 (100%) https://otisstraffic.com/projectstudy/printpreview?guid=8a4f37d86S8dOfU226e95595e391 d58c 5/20/2013 Print Preview Eattetr�at�'�rt�ts< � � Land Use External Trips Pass-by% 220 - Apartment � 16 �% 254 - Assisted Living 13 �o�o Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 220 - Apartment ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by% for this case. 254 - Assisted Living ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by% for this case. � __ _. _ _ _ _ Summary Total Entering Total Exiting Total Entering Reduction Total Exiting Reduction Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction Total Entering Pass-by Reduction Total Exiting Pass-by Reduction Total Entering Non-Pass-by Trips Total Exiting Non•Pass-by Trips Pass-by Trips 0 0 Page 2 of 2 Non-pass-by Trips 116 13 https://otisstraffic.com/proj ectstudy/printpreview?guid=8a4f37d865 8dOfb226e95 595 e391 d58c 5/20/2013 Print Preview Analysis Name: Project Name: Date: StatelProvince: Country: AnalysYs Name: PM Peak Hour Bayview Gardens - Existing 5/1/2013 No: City: ZiplPostal Code: Client Name: Edition: 9th Land lJse Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry - � - — - � �� _ �M______ 93 220 - Apartment Dwelling Units 229 Weekday, Peak Hour of Best Fit (LIN) �._..___ _ ._---- — ----------� Adjacent Street Traffic, � �— .`�..y� . One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. _,. .__ _ .,_._ _,� _ _._ _._., , ___ ___ ___ __ 254 - Assisted Living � Beds � 94 Weekday, Peak Hour of !� Average , 9 ��,_�. _._ .-�- _ ---- � AdjacentStreetTraffic, j �- -----__ _�____ _...__..__ _�F � One Hour Between 4 and j a 6 p.m. __ _ � _ __ . . _. __ Tra�c Reductinns Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry 220 - Apartment �% 93 254 - Assisted Living �% 9 220 - Apartment Exit 51 Entry 93 220 - Apartment Entry Exit Total 254 - Assisted Living Demand Exit: �% (0) Demand Entry: a% (0) Total Trips __._.__ __. __. 93 (100%) 51 (100%) 144 (100%) Balanced: 0 Balanced: 0 Exit Reduction �% �% Page 1 of 2 Exit Total 51 144 12 21 Adjusted Exit 51 12 254 - Assisted Living Demand Entry: �% (0) Entry 9 Demand Exit: 0�% (0) Exit 12 Internal Trips ' .. . ,.�_ ... _...__ _ . __ _ -- � External TNps 254-Assisted Living Total G _ _________� �_ ____ _ _ _ _. _ _ 0 (0%) _. � __. _ 0 (0%) _ 93 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) , 51 (100%) 0 (0%) � 0 (0%) I 144 (100%) Internal Trips ° � Total Trips j _--.-- .--_ .---.--. __ _ _ __._ _______.�..�� __. , External Trips � 220 - Apartment ; Total '. _ _____ ____� � _ . _ ._ _ __ . �e, ___. . _ _ _ „_. . �...._.� E.-.. T.-�_ .,__� . L Entry � 9(100°/a) 0(0%) 0(0%) 9(100%) Exit 12 (100%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 12 (100%) Total I 21 (100%) 0(0%) � 0(0%) � 21 (100%) https://otisstraffic.com/proj ectstudy/printpreview?guid=7712107baafLd416854f20733bc 13b24 5/20/2013 Print Preview Land Use 220 - Apartment 254 - Assisted Living External Trips 144 21 Pass-by% �% �% Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External 7rips 220 - Apartment ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by% for this case. 254 - Assisted Living ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by% for this case. Tota! Entering Total Exiting Total Entering Reduction Total Exiting Reduction Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction Total Entering Pass-by Reduction Total Exiting Pass-by Reduction Total Entering Non-Pass-by Trips Total Exiting Non-Pass-by Trips Page 2 of 2 Pass-by Trips Non-pass-by Trips: 0 144 Q 21 102 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 63 https://otisstraffic.com/proj ectstudy/printpreview?guid=7712107baafZd416854fZ0733bc 13b24 5/20/2013 r LL ° C eai�ater V Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Land�caping App�ication IT IS INCIiMBENT UPON TWE APPLICANT TO 5UBMIT COMPL�TE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MIStEADiNG, DECEPTFVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECf INFORMATFON MAY IN5/ALIDA'fEYOIIR APPLICATION. /kLL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT CUMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITFED IN PERSUN (NO FAX OR DEUVERIES) TO �'HE PLANNING & DEVEIOPMENF DEPARTMEN7' BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADUNE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLEFE SETS OF RLANS AND �1PPLICAI'ION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAt AND 10 COPIESj AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITa'ED FOR REVIEW BY TME DEVELORMENT REVfEW COMM4TTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITfAL FUR THE CUMMUNITY UEVfLOPMENT BOARD, IF NECES�ARY, Wlil REQUIRE 15 CUMPLfTE SEFS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIAtS (1 URIGFNAt kND 14 CUPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATfU, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO S�TS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ACL APPLIGABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELUPMENTCODE. FROPER'fY01NNER(PER DEED:j: B�G Acquisifi'ron Inc. Att: Santa fe Senior living MAILING ADQRESS: 43U0 NW �9 Blud, Gainesvilte, �L 32606-5688 PHONE NUMBER: 3�52.337:8671 EMAIL, �roy.Hart@avmed:org AGENT OR REPRESENTAiIVE: Ar�thonV Evet'eft �B�PSREG BaWiew Venture, A Uelaware ljmited liaiiility company, an affiliate ofi Pollack Shores Real fstate Group MA4LING ADDRESS: 50051nterbaV Blvd, Tampa, ��54� PHOME NUMBEfi; 813.90�.917:9 EMAtI: aeverett@theeverettcompany.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROFER'fY: 2$�5 Gu4f to Bay B�tvd UESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The comprehensive Iandscape program appf�ication associated with the redeveloprnent 3pecifiml/y identify rhe request of a 37.55 acre project to construct 42� tnultifamily residential units. We saved nearly (include all requested code flexibiliry; 300 trees on site. Majority of th�m are large in size. Also, we provided Jarger interior e.g., reducEion Tn requlred number of , pa�king spaces, heighr, serbacks, ►ot 151ands than city standards to accomodate shade'trees and saved trees. The appiication sfze, lot width, speciJic use, ete.): requests �elief f�orn providing 1 tree/150 SF required VUA green space. _ STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTaf OF PINElLAS f, the undersigned, acknowledge Ehat all Sworn to and subseribed before me this �� day of representations made in this application are true and -�; ��e , q�v �� . to me and/orby accurate to the best ofi my knorvledge and muthorize °'°r` Ctty representatives to visit and �hotograph the /��'�/,P�2�if' � who is personaFly known has property�cr�bed in this ap lication. produced �i. ��L as identification. � � � n � sr �fj( �G��."r.----- of property owner or representative My commission expires: `��t1Y III ',�o,� .�sjning &.lff��k��men 700 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33766, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4665 _. �t�y Rublic - 5tatb of Florida Revlsed 01H2 �� = My 6omm. Expfros Mar 16, 2016 P �� "`,:`FOF� d��'� Commission # EE 1%5506 ��a,��r,t� r� o Plannfng & Development Department � �� Com. rehens�ve Landscaping �pplication p � Flexibil�ty Crifieria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE FIVE (5) �LEXIBILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING MOW, IN DETAII, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMFLI�D WITH PER THIS COMPREMENSIVE LANUSCAPING PROPOSAL. 1. Arc�itecturalTheme: a. The landscaping in a CompreMensive tandscaping program shahl be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The proposed �andscaping will exc�ed eode minimums in both siae and quantity pa:rCicularly at the residential bufldings and c,ornmon areas. 2. 1lghting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscaping program is automaticaliy controlled so that the lighting is turned a�F when the business is closed. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character af tMe City of Clearwater. �n adaiiion to exceeding rod� m_inim�mc �p(.e.h3.v�gon o xtravagant meas�rec to nrPCprve as manv trees as nossibie on the heav�y wooded site�j.�ciuding nearly 300 trees�mainly mature live oaks but a so 18 pafms �o be relocated, 4. Property Values. The landscape treatm2nt proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ThQ new devetoprnent is a si.gnificant upgrade #rom the existing development. As such, the landscape treatment wiif be on par with the architecture, increasing.the prope- rty values in the immediate vicinity. 5. Speclal Area or Scenlc Corridor Plan. The fandscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Eandscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which tHe� City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The site Is not located within a special area or scenic corridor. � Planning & Development Department,100 S, Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Fage 7 of 2 Revised 01/12 ° learwater r � U� Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE FIVE (5) FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PERTHIS COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING PROPOSAL. 1. ArchitecturalTheme: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be designed as a part of the architecturai theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The proposed landscaping will exceed code minimums in both size and quantity particularly at the residential buildin�s and common areas. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscaping program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. Lighting will be controlled as required by Code 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. In addition to exceeding code minimums, we have gone to extravagan m a �r to nr rv as many tr P�s _ as possible on the heavily wooded site, includin�nearly 300 trees mainly mature live oaks, but also 18 palms to be re 4. Property Va/ues. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The new development is a significant upgrade from the existing development. As such, the landscape treatment will be on par with the architecture, increasing the property values in the immediate vicinity. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The site is not located within a special area or scenic corridor. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 2 Revised 01/12 Pollack:Shores Development, LLC �c/o Anthony M,;Everett pirector-Centra( Florida 5005Interbay Bivd. Tampa, FL 33611 RE: To Whom It May Concern: May 14, 2013 Permits for a 425 unit apartment community to be constructed on the old Bayview Gardens praperty generally described at 2855 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater; Florida ("5ubject Property") and more particularly described in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 7his letter shall constitute the Owner's authorization for Poliack Partners, LLC (inciuding any affiliate or retated Company of Pollack Shpres Development, LLCj (collectively, Poilack Partners) to act as Owner's agent to sign, file appiications and apply wlth the appropria2e governmental entities to obtain necessary approvals, permits and �ny necessary amendments for construction of a 425 unit apartment community on the property described in Exhibit "A," tncluding without limftatio�l, City of Cleatwater development approvaf, Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) permits, Army Corps of Engineers permits, Florida Department of 7rensportation permits, Water and Navigation Authority approval, the City of Clearmtater and/or Pinellas County Development Orders, permits, and utility approvals. Sincerely, Owner (s) BVG ACQUISITION, ING Print . � � i�� vl.%�� As its_ -�' �,�� STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ALACHUA Sworn, to and seibScFi�ed beforQ rne thia �� day of. � +�' `� 2019, b_ f� � �� '� r" � . on behalf of Owner(s). The person is{fs known by mej jhas produced .. as id nt'rfication) and as such (did} (did not) take an oath. �-,.�..._....._--% �; , '�\\`�� 411�� /�� ♦ ,..... E �< � �.��'M�be ��'�F�f i • � � � � Qg �?Q�N' � �� 6� � 7C ,'�7�C i �� • ' �• #EE 196172 � Q' • . . �o � �J' '. � �nded 1h� �e �: OQ� ''i99 •• °YFain•Inso�;.• v �� /� f�B�IC, STA�� ` iltlf i14111\\ 448�}69Gv i r �- . � L- ��-�, t �- �.l t.� �; � .t� ,�- � � `��- No�aryP II� . P�int Name t'�I (��}!� {�� • � . � � �i. (�% � Commission Expires: C� � � Bayview Gardens Responses to 07/02/13 Letter of Incompleteness THE PRESTON PARTNERSHIP, LLC A MULTI-DISCIPLINARY DESIGN FIRM 115 Perimeter Center Place Suite 950 Atlanta, GA 30346 770 396 7248 1: To be addressed in the civil engineering drawings. 2: To be addressed in the civil engineering drawings. 3: Per 07/OS/13 phone conversation with Matt Jackson, we will add the footcandle light levels to the legend on sheets L6-06-A & B. 4: To be addressed in the civil engineering drawings. 5: To be addressed in the civil engineering drawings. 6: Tree inventory sheets have been added (L6-O 1-C through L6-O 1-H). 7: Plants with quantities of 0 have been removed. 8: Existing trees to be saved have been added to sheets L6-04-A & B. 9: Areas of islands have been added to sheets L6-04-F & G. 10: Widths of islands have been added to sheets L6-04-F & G. 11: Required site visibility triangles have been added to the landscape plans. 12: Buffer has been added along the southeast property line. Note that 7 selected trees were removed from the buffer along the east property line as these are wooded areas (see newly added L6-04-D & E for aerial photographic information. Shrubs/trees that are located in water were also removed. 13: Yes.