FLD2013-04012� �1����ate�r
�
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
CASE:
REQUEST:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
July 16, 2013
F.4.
FLD2013-04012
Flexible Development application to allow a driveway with a side (west) setback of zero
feet (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project where standards for Residential Infill
Projects are guidelines and may be varied in the Low Medium Density
Residential/Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District
(LMDR/IENCOD), under the provisions of the Community Development Code (CDC)
Section 2-1602.F.
GENERAL DATA:
Agent ........................... Anthony Saravanos
Applicant / Owner ............. Gus and Zoe Saravanos
Location ........................... 350 Harbor Passage; located on the north side of Harbor Passage, approximately 104
feet east of Snug Island
Property Size .................... 0.268 Acres
Future Land Use Plan...... Residential Urban (RU)
Zoning .......................... Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District
SpeCial Area Plan .............. Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD)
Adjacent Zoning... North: LMDR/IENCOD District
South: LMDR/IENCOD District
East: Preservation (P) District
West: LMDR/IENCOD District
Existing Land Use ............. Detached Dwelling
Proposed Land Use......... Detached nwelling
,-:.�' ��
� ,�� ,,,� �,
; }: � �� �e���
�--.""'";a.t �:�'�t ! "r� `
;',�� �� � ��
:! �„ . � !�
> � �
' �; "+' � � *�. w
�:�i'` r- �' ,
�" + :�,
�, T h � �' , : � ''
j ����'V � ` :
� ,
�t`R'��� �i� �_ .
,�
�+;.. �;
, � ,���
�
,
.� ,�►�
r� J�J� d
i!; a`'�
s..
�. �
�� �'.
� 4 "
�?
' l��l.�� ►T KLI.� Level II Flexible Development Application Review
�� '� , �_�^.N�:,� : �. ... _ ,_ .. .,. .
,.. ` _/`�./".... `�. . .
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 0.268 acre subject property is located on the
north side of Harbor Passage approximately 104
feet east of the Snug Island and Harbor Passage
intersection. The property is presently
developed with a detached dwelling and it is
located in the Island Estates Neighborhood
Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD). The
properties to the north, south and west are zoned
Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)
District/IENCOD and are developed with
detached dwellings. The canal to the east is
zoned Preservation (P) District and a part of
Clearwater Harbor.
Development Proposal:
The proposal is to remove the existing concrete
driveway and replace it with brick paver
driveway that will match an existing paver
walkway already on the property. The existing
driveway is a nonconforming structure because
it was constructed with a side (west) setback of
zero feet prior to the adoption of the current
code and overlay district development standards.
The side (west) setback of zero feet (actual 0.7
inches) does not comply with the side setback of
7.5 feet as set forth in the LMDR/IENCOD. The
current owner states that he purchased the
property in 1981, and, based on a submitted
survey done in February of 1981, the driveway
remains today as it was when the property was
purchased. Pursuant to CDC Section 6-102, a
nonconforming structure shall not be altered,
enlarged or changed in any way that increases its
nonconformity. Any structure or site
improvement may, however, may be altered to
decrease its nonconformity. For this reason, the
applicant proposes to reduce the area of the
driveway by 27 square feet and replace it with
greenspace thereby decreasing the
nonconformity.
Special Area Plan: Island Estates Neighborhood
Conservation Overlay District
�
i I �' �
i �� �,
°- �--, �� -, �
�� �' ', �',
� � �
, , „
��� ��=r'
� --
, �. �
, , �:
� ,�
� � ';��
� -' ,� ,� �
J
I W�
�� � - -
;� � -
, ��
�A., """L,,�`�.
; -- _
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
� F
; ;
,:
% �I �
s '�
PROJECT - � �
SITE
� _
\ ��E - '
�,\ , . _
__ , ,:�,,; _- --
- �--:
_ . f , �
LOCATION MAP
Community Development Board — July 16, 2013
FLD2013-04012 — Page 1
° p��.�ct�n} �+ PLANNWG & DEVELOPMENT
� C\.t�l 1'Tf�iel Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
Y r
The designation of IENCOD in the zoning atlas provides requirements in addition to those
contained in the LMDR District. The provisions contained in the LMDR/IENCOD District (CDC
Section 2-1602.D) such as lot area, lot width, front setback, side setback, rear setback, height and
number of required parking spaces shall govern in the overlay district. However, the standards
for Residential Infill Projects are guidelines and may be varied based upon the criteria specified
in CDC Section 2-1602.F. Issues not specifically addressed in this overlay district such as
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR) and density shall be governed by the LMDR District (CDC
Section 2-201).
Develonment Parameters
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR� Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-
201.1, within the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category, the allowable ISR is
0.65. The existing ISR is 0.62; and although the applicant will remove 27 square feet of
impervious surface area of the property will continue to have an ISR of 0.62.
Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-201.1, within the
Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category, the allowable density is 7.5 units per
acre. As the lot area is 11,647.08 square feet (0.268 acres), one dwelling unit is allowed and
therefore, the existing density is in compliance.
Minimum Lot Area: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1602.F., within the LMDR/IENCOD there is no
minimum lot area for Residential Infill Projects. The lot area of the subject property is 11,647.08
square feet which exceeds the detached dwelling minimum standard of 7,500 square feet found
in CDC Table 2-1602.D.
Minimum Lot Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1602.F., within the LMDR/IENCOD there is no
minimum lot width for Residential Infill Projects. The subject property has a lot width of 118.48
feet which exceeds the detached dwelling minimum standard of 50 feet found in CDC Table 2-
1602.D.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1602.F., within the LMDR/IENCOD, Residential
Infill Projects allow for a side setback to range between zero and 7.5 feet. The property consists
of a side (east) setback to pavement and rear (north) setback to pool deck that are
nonconforming; this request is only requesting flexibility in the side (west) setback of zero feet
to driveway. The driveway will continue to have a zero foot side (west) setback as the owner
wishes to maintain as much of the driveway area as possible. The owner proposes to remove 27
square feet of driveway along the side (west) property line that will result in a side (west) setback
that varies between zero and six feet. The owner states that due to his disability and age, he
wants to maintain the width of the driveway to allow for two vehicle lanes 12 feet wide and a
five foot wide loading area with an accessible path that leads to the primary entrance. The
existing width of the driveway allows for typical handicap parking requirements from the 2012
Florida Accessibility Code and the ADA. Nevertheless, the owner submitted photos of seven
homes in the area of the subject property with wide driveways and they are finished with
decorative brick pavers. The subject driveway is similar in width to these properties and will be
constructed of brick pavers consistent with the properties.
Community Development Board — July 16, 2013
FLD2013-04012 — Page 2
� v1�.R1 1`TaLel Levei II Flexible Devel ment lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
�P APP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION
u. . .. , �a;, . ;�. ...
The modification to the driveway will result in a portion of the driveway with a 6 foot side
setback and 27 square feet of greenspace area. The proposed reduction to the impervious surface
area of the driveway with the addition of green space, and adding decorative brick pavers rather
than the concrete slab driveway is an improvement that Staff supports.
Maximum Buildin�He�i� Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1602.F. within the LMDR/IENOCD,
Residential Infill Projects allows for a maximum building height of 30 feet. The height of the
detached dwelling is 23.5 feet as measured from the Base Flood Elevation to midpoint of pitched
roof, which is consistent with the above.
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1602.F. within the LMDR/IENOCD,
Residential Infill Projects require two parking spaces per dwelling unit. The driveway and the
gaxage will have sufficient space for two vehicles or more to park on-site, which is consistent
with the above.
Comprehensive Plan: The proposal is supported by various Goals, Objectives andlor Policies of
the City's Comprehensive Plan as follows:
Future Land Use Plan Element
Polacy A.S.S.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or
envisioned character of the neighborhood.
The proposed brick paver driveway will be similar in style to many detached dwellings
driveways in the area. The reduction of the impervious surface area improves the existing
conditions on the property that support the envisioned chaxacter of the IENCOD. Therefore, this
Policy is supported by the proposal.
Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlav District: Character of Redevelopment
5. Goal.• To ensure that development and redevelopment is compatible with the character and
scale of surrounding properties to promote high property values, a good quality of life, and
consistent and appealing appearances throughout the neighborhood.
The redevelopment of the driveway from concrete slab to decorative brick pavers is consistent with
existing driveways on surrounding properties. The new driveway will result the improved
appearance of the property. Therefore, this Goal is supported by the proposal.
Community Development Code: The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and
basic planning objectives of this Code as follows:
Section 1-103.B.1. Allowing property owners to enhance the value of their property through
innovative and creative redevelopment.
The property owner will be able to enhance the � property with a new decorative brick paver
driveway while decreasing the area of a nonconforming structure. Therefore, the proposal
supports this Code section.
Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative
impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development
and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties.
Community Development Board — July 16, 2013
FLD2013-04012 — Page 3
' Vie�Rlel Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT
p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
L
The replacement of the existing driveway with a decorative brick paver driveway and adding
greenspace will not have a negative impact or devalue adjacent properties.
Section 1-103.D. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of
the city a matter of the highest priority and to require that existing and future uses and structures
in the city are attractive and well-maintained to the maximum extent permitted by law.
The proposal decreases the area of a nonconforming structure, and it will add a new decorative
brick paver driveway. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section.
General purpose and Intent of the LMDR/IENCOD Zoning District (Section 2-1602) • The intent
and purpose of the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) is to
provide overlay requirements to ensure that infall and redevelopment activities are consistent
with the protection of the existing established character within the district and to protect the
health, safety and general welfare of the district. Development and redevelopment shall be
reviewed for consistency with the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan. Any development
requesting flexibility from the minimum development standards of the IENCOD shall be
consistent with the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan.
The existing concrete slab driveway connects to a brick paver walkway that leads to the house
and mailbox. The use of different materials for the walkways and driveway give an unfinished
appearance to the property. The applicant submitted twelve photographs of driveways in the area
with wide driveways that consist of decorative brick pavers. The photos show seven driveways
similar in width and proposed materials to the subject driveway. The width of the driveway is
similar to other driveways. The use of brick pavers for the driveway is consistent with the
existing character of the area.
The proposal supports of the General Applicability requirements of this Code as follows:
Section 3-914.A.1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The owner will upgrade the driveway generally within the existing driveways footprint. The
proposed decorative brick paver driveway is consistent with the use of decorative brick paver
driveways in the neighborhood. The applicant submitted seven photographs of driveways in the
immediate area with wide driveways made of brick pavers. The use of brick pavers is consistent
with the character of the area. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section.
Section 3-914.A.2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and
use of adjacent land and buildings or signifacantly impair the value thereof.
The new driveway will not discourage or significantly impair use andlor value of the adjacent
property. Therefore, the proposal supports this Code section.
Section 3-914.A.3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood.
The proposal will have no effect on the health and/or safety of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
Community Development Board — July 16, 2013
FLD2013-04012 — Page 4
� C��ui 1'T ale� Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
� . . . ..._ . .. .
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION
Section 3-914.A.4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffc congestion.
The proposal will have no effect on traffic congestion. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with
this CDC Section.
Section 3-914.A. S. The proposed development is consistent with the communiry character of the
immediate vicinity.
The submitted photos of homes in the area show that seven homes with wide driveways that are
finished with brick pavers in the area of the subject property. The proposed driveway is similar
in width and will be constructed of brick pavers. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the
character of driveways in the neighborhood and is consistent with this Code section.
Section 3-914.A.6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
The design of the driveway should not result in any adverse olfactory, visual and acoustic
impacts on adjacent properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
The proposal supports of the specific criteria for Residential Infill Projects of this Code as
follows:
Section 2-404.F. Residentiallnfill Projects.
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise
impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development
standards.
The owner will decrease the nonconformity through the Residential Infill Process. Therefore, the
proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not
materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
Reducing the area of the driveway will not reduce the market value of adjacent properties.
Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are othenvise permitted in the district.
Detached dwellings axe a permitted use within the IENCOD. Therefore, the proposal is
consistent with this CDC Section.
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent lands uses.
The driveway is consistent with other properties driveway in the area. Therefore, the proposal is
consistent with this CDC Section.
S. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infrll project will
upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Renovating the driveway with brick pavers similar to the existing walkway gives the property a
finished appearance. Such curb appeal will upgrade the appearance of the neighborhood as well
as nearby properties. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
Community Development Board — July 16, 2013
FLD2013-04012 — Page 5
� C�eRl �'1 �Lel Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNiNG & DEVEI.OPtvIENT
P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
u . �AqdO; ..
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which
enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The subject property is well maintained in regard to landscape and upkeep of the property. The
brick paver driveway is similar to surrounding driveways and its improvement will enhance the
character of the neighborhood with a unified appearance. Therefore, the proposal is consistent
with this CDC Section.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified
by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinfty of the parcel proposed for
development and the Ciry of Clearwater as a whole.
The reduced side (west) setback will not have a negative effect on the community character,
adjacent properties or the City of Clearwater. The owner of the adjacent property to the west
submitted a letter of support. The removal of a portion of the driveway allows for added
greenspace and reduces the existing nonconformity. Renovating the driveway with brick pavers
similar to the walkway gives the property a finished appearance. Renovating the driveway with
brick pavers similar to driveways in the area is consistent with the character of the neighborhood.
Therefore, the proposal is consistent with this CDC Section.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated
with the subj ect property.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the detached dwelling with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-201.1 and 2-
1602.F.:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Density 7.5 du/ac (1 unit) 1 unit (existing) X
ISR 0.65 0.62 X
Minimum Lot Area N/A 11,674.08 square feet X
Minimum Lot Width N/A 118.48 feet X
Minimum Setbacks Front: 15 - 25 feet South: 25 feet X
Side: 0- 5 feet West: Zero feet X
East: Zero feet X
Rear: 0- 15 feet North: Zero feet X
Maximum Height 30 feet 23.5 feet X
Minimum Off-Street 2 spaces per dwelling unit 2 spaces X
Parkin
Community Development Board — July 16, 2013
FLD2013-04012 — Page 6
� 1���.A1 17�Le1 Level II Flexible Development Application Review
u �,a"w : ' �. .
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the
consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-
1602.F. (Residential Infill Project):
Consistent
1. T'he development or redevelopment of the pazcel proposed for development is I X
otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity
or other development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project
will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district.
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project
will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which
enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access
or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character
and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
X
X
X
X
X
X
Inconsistent
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards
for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the heaith or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize tra�c congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and oifactory and hours of operation impacts on adiacent nroperties.
Consistent � Inconsistent
X
X
X
X
X
X
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of June 6, 2013, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move
forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact
and conclusions of law:
Community Development Board — July 16, 2013
FLD2013-04012 — Page 7
� C��.i�� 1'1' a`el Level II Flexible Develo ment A licabon Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
P PP DEVELOPIvfENT REVIEW DIVISION
� s
Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence
submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that
there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
1. That the 0.268 acre subject property is located on the north side of Harbor Passage; 104 feet
east of the Snug Island and Harbor Passage intersection;
2. That the property is located in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)/ Island Estates
Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD);
3. The property has a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Urban (RU);
4. That the property is developed with a detached dwelling;
5. That the owner will remove 27 square feet of area from the driveway thereby decreasing a
nonconforming structure;
6. That the proposal is to remove the existing concrete slab driveway and replace it with
decorative brick pavers;
7. That the proposal includes a reduction of the side (west) setback from 7.5 feet to zero feet
where zero feet is allowable as development standards for Residential Infill Projects are
guidelines and may vary; and
8. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above
findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law:
l. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-201.1 and 2-
1602.F.of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
1602.F.2 of the Community Development Code; and
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914 of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development application to allow a driveway with a side (west) setback of zero feet
(to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project where standards for Residential Infill Projects are
guidelines and may be varied in the Low Medium Density Residential/Island Estates
Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (LMDR/IENCOD), under the provisions of the
Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-1602.F, with the following conditions of
approval:
Conditions of A�proval:
1. That the final design of the brick paver driveway be consistent with the site plan approved by
the Community Development Board; and
2. That a building permit be obtained for the demolition and construction of the driveway.
, ---,
,
,
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: _
K' W. Nurnberger, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS: Photographs of Site and Vicinity
Community Development Board — July 16, 2013
FLD2013-04012 — Page 8
i ^. �
�, R �j � ��+
....... � ,�
........ �`ai-Ni ��
,� � ���1l��
�
;� ,;�:. � �
`, ���
l.uokin� at subjecl drivc�ti�iy.
�;�.:}.�;� :, ;�,��;„:
,, ,._
4Y.', ;C�:. . � k'_�_ .
�►
. t.��. .i� . � . �
Adjacent property rcar yard abuts subject property sidc yard.
�
� `� ����,� ` - �
Y ��y�, ,, .� �°`�:
a S,
��,, '•�'�\.\ ..
I
� � - - ��,
,,
�`� ����
Lu��king wcst �'rom subject property.
��.
''
, �/' � ��
� �—� _ �. ... . 'C .. . _. _ .. ..
�
-'� `„"'— �
:'►��, v�y:.._ '' r�i��4 ... .. . � ,
a
View of existing concrctc clrivcw�ay
Looking south at prop�rly across Harhor Passage.
�I�It. �, "` i' � � + '
' '4J=,��I� �' ? I � �j�.
�+.. I I �
.. � . �. � t ! �� •:
. � . . ` ` � � . ., -.
! � �
�,ii � } t I . l i ��G1�rlc3! rd.�.� �h ;+J � , g��
`* " � i �` � �.` �,1 � , 1�, r r .�. ,4 �5'� �R u�.. F)`
� , i1,:-Ll. �� I��,�1._...i�� 3�u��i. ,,. ;:'Sin�!�i-.:�lc�,.`.'Y
t _ �. ,• _ .. .
� `
. �.
Concrete area to be removed to allow f��r greenspace.
350 Harbor Passage
FLD2013-04012
Kevin W. Nurnberger
100 S Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
727-562-4567ext2502
kevin.nurnber�er(c�myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Planner III March 2011 to present
Planner II October 2010 to March 2011
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, FZorida
Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land
development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and
provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boaxds and Committees.
Planner
Counry of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009
Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with
planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design
criteria, speciiications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents,
neighborhood organizations, contractors, and developers regarding future projects which included state
and local government agencies.
Site Assistant
Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007
Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on
procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site
assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage.
Development Planner
Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006
Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning
documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations,
the Virginia Deparhnent of Historic Resources, the Virginia Deparhnent of Transportation plan, and
Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building
expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties.
City Planner
City Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to 2005
Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with
the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and
conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the City Planning Commission and
Board of Zoning Adjustments.
EDUCATION
University of New Orleans, LA
MA Urban and Regional Planning (2004)
State University of New York at Buffalo, NY
BA Anthropology (1999)
,
LL
° C earwater
U
Planning & Development Deparhnent
Flexible Development Application
Detached Dwellings, Duplexes orAssociated Accessory Use/Structures
IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISIEADiNG, DECEPTIVE,
INCOMPLETE OR INCORRER INFORMATION MAY INVAUDATE YOUR APPUCATION.
ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELNERIES)
TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE.
A TOTAL OF 11 EOMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPUCATION MATERIAIS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN
ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMI7'fEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPUCATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL
AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS.
THE APPUCANT, BY FIUNG THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABIE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
COMMUNtTY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
FIRE DEPT PREUMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200
APPUCATION FEE: $300
PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED):
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
EMAIL:
SARAVANOS, GUS SARAVANOS, ZOE
350 HARBOR PASSAGE, CLEARWATER, FL 33767-1811
727-442-1400
N/A
AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: �HONY S1�tAVANOs
MAILING ADDRESS: 3164o US HIGHWAY 19, NORTH,SUITE 1, FALM HARBOR, FL 34683
PHONE NUMBER: 72�-643-8922 -
EMAIL: asc�boardwalkcompany.com
ADDRESS OF SUBIECT PROPERTY:
PARCEL NUMBER(S):
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PROPOSED USE(S):
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
350 HARBOR PASSAGE, CLEARWATER, FL 33767-1811
OS-29-15-43456-071-0120
ISLAND EST OF CLEARWATER UNITS 6D,7A,7C,UNIT 7A,LOT 12
REPLACING EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY WITH DECORATIVE PAVERS. MAINTAIN
Specifically iden[ify the request EXZSTING DRIVEWAY DIMENSIONS DUE TO OWNER�S HANDICAP STAT[TS (SEE
(include all requested code �lexibifity,• ATTACHED DOCTOR � S LETTER) .
e.g., redudion in required number of
parking spaces, height setbacks, lot
size, lot width, specific use, etc.J:
Planning � Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 72T-562-4865
Page 1 of 7
Revised 01N2
LL
° � earwater
U
Planning & Development Departrnent
Flexible Development Application
Data Sheet
PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOILOWING iNFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS fORM
WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPUCATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTiI THE FOLLOWING
APPUCATION CYCIE.
ZONING DISTRICT:
FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING USE (currently existing on site):
PROPOSED USE (new use, ff any; plus existing, if to remain):
SINGLE FAMILY HOME
SITEAREA: 11, 674 .08 Sq. ft. .268
acres
GROSS FLOOR AREA (totai square footage of all buildings):
Existing:
Proposed:
Maximum Allowable:
4 , 773 Sq. ft.
4,��3 sq.ft.
sq. ft.
GRO55 FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses):
First use: N�A sq. ft.
Second use:
Third use:
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire sitej:
Existing: . 4 o e
Proposed: . 4 0 8
Maximum Allowable:
BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (lrt floor square footage of all buildings):
Existing: i, 845 Sq_ ft. �. isso %ofsite)
Proposed: 1, e45 Sq, f�_ � . 1580 % of site)
Maximum Permitted: sq. ft. ( 9� of sitej
GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICUtAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer):
Existing: 3, � 8 � mol sq. ft. ( 3 2. 0 2 % of site)
Proposed: 3, �s� moi Sq. ft. � 32. 02 %of sitej
VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area):
Existing: 1290 S, ft, . iios
4 � % of site)
Proposed: 129a s
q. ft. ( . iio5 % of site)
Planning & Development Departrnent, 100 S. My�tle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562�567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 2 of 7
Revised 01N2
�
.
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: 62 . es
Proposed: 62.ee
Maximum Permitted:
DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre):
Existing: x/A
Proposed:
Maximum Permitted:
OFFSTREET PARKING:
Existing:
Proposed:
Minimum Required:
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Existing: .xf�, aa �
Proposed:
Maximum Permitted:
x/A Note: A parking demand study must be provided In conjundion with any request
to reduce the amouni of required off-street parking spaces. Please see the
adopted Porking Demand Study Guidelines for further information.
WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $ 5, o 0 0
ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADIACENT PROPERTY:
North:
South:
East:
West:
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEILAS
I, the u�dersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this �`��- day of
representations made in this application are true and {�/� (��_
accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize - "-� '^ ! �a ( 3 . to me and/or by
City representatives to visit and photograph the �( �.�[,Z,,rGt\/Q.�-� � who is personally known ha
property describ " this application. --
L� Produced as identification.
D� /� %%�[ l� /� � �� "�,�, _ �
Signature of property owner or representative
Notary public,
My commission expires: J I
._
�.�'�`� LESUE SVARC�COPF
, Conxnission # EE 205139
- E�ir�es June 5, 2a16
e�.e n� r� vw r.,..,,. �ooa�s.ro»
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 3 of 7
Revised 01/12
LL
° C earwater . planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
� Site Plan Submittal Package Check list
IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVEIOPMENT (FLD) APPUCATION, ALL FLD APPUCATIONS FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY
OETACHED DWEWNG, DUPLEX, OR ACCESSORY USE/STRUCTURE ASSOCIATED WRH EITHER A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED
DWELUNG OR DUPID( SHALL INCLUDE A PIOT PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
O Responses to the General Applicability criteria as set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application
General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses.
❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning Distrid(s) in which the
subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Ftexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide
these responses.
❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property,
dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including
official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site.
❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as
provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5.
❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other si milar
marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional
engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engi�eer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair
or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on
private and commercial docks.
❑ A tree survey showing the location, D6H (diameter at b�east height), and species on the parcel proposed for development
with a DBH of four inches or more and identifying those trees proposed to be removed.
❑ A site plan with the following information:
❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared.
❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard
Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFEj of the property, as applicable.
❑ Location, setbacks and use of all existing and proposed building and structures.
O Location of all existing and proposed parking areas, sidewalks and driveways.
❑ Location, type of material and height of all existing and proposed fences.
❑ Locatio� of all existing and proposed utilities, including water, sewer, gas, and stormwater.
❑ Location of all existing utility easements, including Official Records book and page numbers, and any proposed utility
easements.
❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height, building materials, and concealment of
all mechanical equipment located on the roof.
Planning � Development DepaRment, 900 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 4 of 7
Revised 01N2
�
LL
° C earwat Planning & Development Department
_ er Flexible Develo ment A licatio
p pp n
� Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative
i. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names:
cus s�v�os
ZOE SARAVANOS
2. That (I am e ar the owne�(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property:
A SINGLE FAMiLY RESIDENCE THAT WE HAVE OCCUPIED SINCE 1981 - 350 HARBOR PASSAGE, CLEARWATER
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request):
TO REPLACE THE AGZNG EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY WZTH A NEW DRIVEWAY THAT IS IN THE SAME
VERNACULAR APPEARANCE AS THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND MAINTAIN THE EXISTING WIDTH OF DRIVEWAY.
4. That the undersigned (ha have appointed and (does do) ppoint:
�oxx s�v�xos
as (hi . their agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affed such petition;
S. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and ad on the above described
property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner
authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That (I/we), the und rsigned authority, he�eby certify that the foregoing is true and corred.
� Dl
Property Owner Property Owner
°�--�-c�a.il�A/l►�,ne7
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON
THIS � I�•� DAY OF /"IGL�� � �3 , PERSONALLY APPEARED
_� k� SAJ'�Y �) as i�l� �P �� 0.�� p� �/HO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN
DEPOSED ANO SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED.
NMI� �Y��
:��*.� ����on#E�E � 39
..
�' Expires,hxie 5, 2016
9aded Thm T�oy Poin Yuu�na AOD3lF7019
Notary Seal/Stamp
,J j ,
Notary Public Signatur� �
�
My Commission Expires: J�.4.�� S, �� ��
Planning � Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 72T-562-456T; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 7 of 7
Revised 01/12
/ L / �+�+J �V ! L P. 1
FLORIpq pEpA�-��T p� �G�AY SAFETY AIVp 1�pTpR V�HICLES
APPUCATION FOR DISAg�p p�g�N P���G PERMtT
"""'SUBNYTAPPLIC,t710N TO YOUR LOCA! COUIrTY TAX COLLECTpR'S C�FICE OR UCENSE PLATE AG�JMCY`"'�»•
w� �TV OOV�OI�ICQS/ . s�
This form is nat valid far more than �2 mon�s trorrr the date of d�e ce�tify�Rg autho '�
iVT e beiow
APPI.ICATION BY DiSAB1.Fp pERSON See yllarrij ge�oy � s�g���
I oe�tty fl�at l am a P�rso� with one of Ihe �as listed in sectlo
�Y�r� P�tia�er tqs con�l�ed tha statement ot ceKiFieaHon beloNr�p}��� Fbrida Sdtut�s. I furtfw stata Mat
�7/ bahalf. as requind in � 32Q0848. Florids Statubss,
Gus Sc�rczvanos 56E -2i�o-2 -oza-d .
Aame of OPaabiad Pason a� prinled A� theit
Rorida Driver Liceeaear Pbrida Ip Cad Curra�i Drsabkd Patkinp P�Ani tilumber
� icabfe SiD�a«w d Dtrabled Person or Guart�an dthe pisepbd
P«son
��8�► 0�-2 q-,� �T- �2- ��oo
Sez D'esaelsd paeson•s E-mai 1lddress
Address 350 �{ar�o � P SS �d p�non s PAoee Numhx Dabe S' sd
Ffaida Or1wr llcanar or FbrWa lo Numbx G 1 � � Staee � I Z 33 76 7
(Reqwnaa ror pem+enent aea bmporary p� v�aits
�"°°�a a vny�,,, y�,wy �r ePpicab+e. a►eac one of u�e rwowi�,g:
� 1 am a frequerrt braveter. ❑ I am a quadriplegic.
PFI1�SIqANlCER71FY1NG PRACTRlONER'S STATEMENT OF C�tTIFICATl01�( Sse
❑ �MPORARY PERYIT: This is Lo oeA/y Ihr, ths � W�lig BO�OW)
wNk or is 1em �Pa�ca�t nwree above is a psrso� wifh a lemporary disabiipr (aa marAhs w l�ss) that Mni� or'
P��lI aght in�paind. Due b ths Eemporyp �Px%c dsebilfqr�� �dc1d balow � h's,'her abB�r b
i��) tlKOUpA (Z�. fh� disabfed person perkino Pert�1t thould hs issued hnm
PERMANENT PEl�IWT: Th's is t� � ��� •
hislher abilky b walk 2o01Ew wilhw� riat 1he aP�lnnt nemed abows 's :agatY Mind or ia a eisaDled Pe�son rdtt+ a Parn+anent diaadi'
DtSAD1UT1/ ' �OPP�+� 10 rrs[ Speciy peJOw CZ-� eithsr kpaly blind a fhe sP+e�c Qisabilily (tiesJ� �' �11Aat J'unRs or imaa�s
7YP� AS dSPt!rEb W FRV18- .
❑ 2. lnabif�r b warc wifhout Mre uee af or a�'stancs hortt a bne
aasixive dsvFee sgntficsHfr res� ths paaorfa abYity to wa �� that ths e�s�on � �s� �O�' ar wiCfout assklanoe o( �nolh� Persa�. � the
ebert+pCOr� parkipD Perrnit P walk wfRwut severe �edt�tion� tl!e person ia aot diyiae for fhe
a
3- Ths need lo pennanerMly use a wheeldiac
�D4 �° � �� �YH� b(ess �me60 m�vng� ,n� ���7f) e�irztory rolume for 1 seqnd, when metsured bY aP�Y. ic le:s th�n one Noer or
S_ Ux ot portabl� ozypso. .
D6. Rs�stricYon by �ardhc condlHon to Ne sxEent that th� . .
l�metiean Heart As��, OMOn'a funclienel limi�ns �����, as dass pl or Cloas N aocading to stanQmds aet 6y Ihe
� �. Severe Rmiratio� in a persan'a abi,ity hi walk due to a� �t
K. narrole9ieal. orathcps�aeor�tion.
a� b • on d • an O�om tt esn ce�U � -
WARNEhiG: Anll P�rsa+ who ImowinBh� �kes a false or mah
misdemeanor of fhe t&st d�yre�. W+n4habN as �� �ement &� aw aPP�atbn or eertiliettlon rnder s�clfon 3a0.Ci�8. Florlda �a4�t�. Qo�Nes a
P�vvid.d rn s.eeton ns.oa or rrs.osa. F.S. Z1N pentltY i� up E� on� !�'s�r in Jail or a fsie of Sl.000 or 6eek
CerUficatlon or Uoense No. (R�q�iredJ , i�.l
OPb�metriat Advanoed Re�ed Nurse
_ oF a PAys�. Ostaop��tye or Po6aUic PMs��n. CKm �/
a liasnrrd PhYsician or a Physida� �s�iKantGOeried und.r � C�
=C, � �7�-Y
��wa�t Ft 33 ��. � /,/—/3 _
� • (Araa Cade)Tekahone Nw
P�„E�'.YCL EXCEPiION Tha sevarefy dsa�aQ applicant nemel �
Ifth� Sp�eld E:espaio� box Ia d+acJaid, the c� � �r^0 � a Penaanenl Plaeard �s unaWe b aMain a Flaida driver tioense a Iden
ff It+e SDeaal Exi�eoGon boz is �' 9 P�Y�+an iaust pravldeJ�isJh�r siynaiun and dao� sign�d bslow. �cation qrd.
— ehecked one of �e wndiYo�a n baxs 2-s at�. ,.,,.�. ..._- �- --. .
APPLICATION BY AN OR "a�O' `1°°•
TA�s is fo oertiy y�at �IZATION (Sae Warning Above)
Y�drffiiGly b wa(k or are aarUfied b be iegafy blinC. Prwdes ragVar trantportaYon serviee b dsaded
Pe�sons havirg disabilRies tl�at Yr.x� or R�j�
d
uSE
HSMV 83039 - REV. 09107/12 �
— -...---- - -- wrvw.Rhsmv aov
04/15/2013
RE: 350 Harbor Passage
City of Clearwater
Permit Dept.
Dear Sirs,
My name is Teresa Gazda-Kennedy, and i live at 643 Snug Island. I am writing to you in
regards to my neighbors property at 350 Harbor Passage. My property is located directly next
to the Saravano's property at 350 Harbor Passage. My neighbors are looking to re-pave their
driveway and put in new pavers next to my property. I have absolutely no problem with the
work they are wanting to do. The Saravanos property is one of the most beautiful and well kept
homes in our neighborhood and any additional work they may do would only enhance the
property. If you have any questions rega�ding this matter please feel free to contact me at
anytime, my home " is 445-1017.
Sincerely,
Teresa Gazda-Kennedy
rineiias wunty ruo��c vi� viewer
Property Report: � qose Window
673 HARBOR IS
OS/29/15/43456/073/0170
:v.�. �� .•,�.r- .-u
General
Mu�icipality: CIEARWATER
Subdivison: ISLAND EST OF CLEARWATER UNITS 6D, 7A, 7C
Tax District:
Census Block:
Census Tract:
Zipcode:
Flre District:
CV11
1000
026001
33767
.259
OS - Clearvvater
Evacuation Level: q
Political
Voter Precinct: 515
At-Large District: ���^� 2
Norm Roche
District 4
Single Member District: Susan Latvala
Environmental
within 330Pt. of Eagles Nest: rya
within 660ft. of Eagles Nest: No
Re clin b Ci
Curbside: nuil
Dropoff: null
Pickup: null
. �=��-��>
� .�:,�.-
ze �
ragelotl
http://gis.pinellascounty.org/public_gis/web/parcel_report2.cfin?TYPE=ADDRES S&STNUM=673 &STR... 4/26/2013
♦
�(
�
.�
-'i-
�
�
�
Pinellas County Public GIS Viewer
Property Report: 0 Close Window
807 HARBOR IS
OS/29/15/43456/073/0370
'��-#�..
/«
PronerN Anoraiser
General
Municipality: CLEARWATER
Subdivison: ISLAND EST OF CLEARWATER UNITS 6D, 7A, 7C
Tax District: CW
Census Block: 1000
Census Tract: 026001
Zipcode: 33767
Acreage: .259
Public Safe
Fire District: 05 - Clearwater
Evacuation Level: A
Political
Voter Precinct: 515
At-Large District: District 2
Norm Roche
Single Member Distrid: District 4
Susan Latvala
Environmental
within 330ft. of Eagles Nest: No
within 660ft. of Eagles Nest: No
R clin b Ci
Curbside: null
Dropoff: null
Pickup: null
. � ,�;°'
f� �
Tax Colledor
Page 1 of 1
http://gis.pinellascounty.org/public�is/web/parcel_report2.cfin?TYPE=ADDRESS&STNUM=807&STR... 4/26/2013
�'� ` T �'
,,�`.. � �
u ��� ��
� � � __ ��
��.
..�,� �-�
� �, � �. °:�
! , � ��AFBOR IS� �:
y ,;y��� � -
�,
'�
\
M
Pinellas County Public GIS Viewer
Property Report: � Close Window
707 ISLAND WAY
05/29/15/43458/000/0180
7:...;..
�w
Prooertv Aooraiser
General
Municipality: CLEARWATER
Subdivison: ISLAND ESTS OF CLEARWATER UNIT 8
Tax District:
Census Block:
Census Tract:
Zipcode:
Fire Distrid:
CW
1008
026001
33767
.276
05 - Clearvvater
Evacuation Level: q
Political
Voter Precinct: 515
At-Large District: District 2
Norm Roche
Single Member District: District 4
Susan Latvala
Environmental
within 330ft. of Eagles Nest: No
within 660ft. of Eagles Nest: No
Re clin b Ci
Curbside: null
Dropoff: null
Pickup: null
, , �-- :
r ,
� ✓,plj.
'»i<:,�, :.c�s" .
Tax Colledor
Page 1 of 1
http://gis.pinellascounty.org/public_gis/web/parcel_report2.cfin?TYPE=ADDRES S&STNUM=707&STR... 4/26/2013
�
�
�
s
-�
�
�
�
.
��v��
_..,».w'S� � 6��'.� . .4: �2 ��':.x�.�i i�
, `��' `'a�"E,,t� ` I .�
w.
. � ?� � �.y " �
�;��.
�; � : : �:�
;,, �� s���f � -�
�i . . ,�-. � }�
,. .
:. ,� �
� ` �.� .., ..
�, - . �
__ ...� _
� - �--�-:�:,._..::...�, � s��;; � �. -
�.�„�� ,' . ��r� . .
..
; . _ , ..,, , -... _
��. .
,. _.
; : � : - _
�, `: '"' �,i - . _..
, ,.
� � �
,1 ;. �-�r,�I i�'
���
�.
,. x
i�
� '
- .! .. .� �'. - .
..... : . �..._� .._..... .' f .
, :- , � -
, . �
. .,
. .�, . . . .:M� ... �J�. F. . /!r '
^ .. . � ...... _ . . . � .� �
� �� ��� � r � v i. ' �ii���ritlt 7 j�
' i ' . �t F . t . , �
1� S- � � 1� ii I i � �� 4.
� �x v i;t � 5 ��1 t�L� !"{r�y���`�`�i � #t��1 "�.
t
� � � � �x � � � � �' � ����� ` � � �
�
�':. �,� .: � r �.� .
• j ,� � �,, _ ,� , :
'.. � .,.._.,.. ,t�i� it .t
,
. �
$E � �r � � -._
_ �
�. �
� � � r � r *,�..
� � }
�` 'x` � � ��R _.�.
t � �� '� a.,,� �a �
T' i ��,�
z :x
� r. -
3, i "�' _
� °
'�� � �f�� • f
. ,��, � �r-.' .. '� ��Y.Y� , ij
'��� � i
f � i �,�. ` i5 t � '
sd. 1
' f '�.. t � t . i
.. � . . . , ' . �.r
�!, , �
� i�
5� p+
�
:�. ,� ,
�� ` �
. � �i�k � �?b �{
y% { f "
i
. jiS c r. �.� � .
.. � . � • ,�.. .
�! f
Ct"�
. . � ' . � � � !i�.
}
... � ��''�^
' . - . 7 t�� .$� .
.. .. . : . d, .
. � . . . . .� . � �� ��.r�:�
. ���' . . �� .
v� i a
j <i� �
` 4 _ �.;
:3
.. . . � ..... . . u �n��
, � , ' ; ��� � �I, '
. �' ; �
. . . . .. �..y�+�� r s.. . • ` � r` �,. � ,�°a:
. . - ... 'ei�... h�,"��? �!F����` A 4!
-r�
� � . .. . "���+� ���1
. #�, .. - .. '��++.�� �. � ��; i" . '.
•",t. , •
. . :e +. , �.�,
. , �. i.
,
. f1 .
.
..
.
+� .
n.°�x'4��� �.. t'� + ,�� � '�' < .�
� �. r t . i� P" .�. t ��i',. � •'. -T'
.; . �j. � .� 1 y.. . . '
fr`-� S�' " 5 � � ���. � r �',r fr .C.r �•�`.+� , . .
�yi ', : f. w�, .,� y�� s,� w', �, r, .. J,_y •.
u �+ • �2 ° j �� : ; � f � � �'.� � , ti
� ��s, ����t ' fs � i/�.�,j„�� .J!i� � i5e; T.r.� , .
Ni '�7
�X ,.�. '+ F�i �..J�, ���,: r:�. ..
' � J'�j}y , � i- � s .
j �� i .. � :
� � tY � � � J�' K . 4� , � .
' � l, � t c•�� +'� � ..,� t•= ` .
��` : } �., � � ( :;� � �:-;� � � • ! ;.
S �r �}' ,'� .�r �t�►�� r �.f' . Y
t { �
1 (
, _ - �L� �•� ��I *'� .
}�r ♦ t`
l��� '���'' p}'F• V' �� ♦ • J.• . .
` r .. ����. .� ' . �•f,• .
. . . . .. ,�' . y� �''�� �' �•! . ;1�*. .y, �' y� �.
. . . . . � .. . � Y,� ' , � . . ~` J{ .
t M.,:` . � j
. . � '�� �. . � (�:�.
�� Li , h, ,„ �. ��
'f 1t �f�i .. � .i �
� �'' � a ' ' Y� i: ��
;
- . �. . . . �' ��..'t. '''f►r
. . . � _ � r ����,��
� ` �
. ,' ��
�
.. . . � ,. � � .. � . .� . +
�5: ,
✓',��;,' . . ! r' .i
r'� Rr � . . .. .�� '�t w�,t y ' _ � '�. . . � ' .. .
�� �' , .�� , � .� i�-r.: . �'
irc '. . 't ' d _ � . ..
. . . . � - � _ _ .. - . ._ .
� ' � . . —�.. T' _ .. � ..
�
.`.'
` � +i .
ii -
S',. '±f
�
� � '" .,._ � �.G it � .
. '�'" �M1+i�' �.� ���' ,- . _.
. __� � ..:� •- - . . .
�:
.._. ��:; .. . � � ' . ,u
. - . - . ._ '=� mm .: , �„y_i `T''_ ...4 . . . .
`.`.+'±
� '� �' � ai ` �, ' ,;,
r� i i -
af�
♦9
'�
�+ r,,�� � � -� �j
� ,� .� : ;,,�+
. +�y•� �' ^� � 's . �i ..i�'�„w •
7' �V- 4.fJ . i � .� • •- �` t� _n .
� .� ' ' ` 1 ��} �,wt Y'' '� y� .' -',`'
�:i'��y ,y y � ���� ;s ��
' %• �' s''i lr�'� R R �� �4i
7`� �i �%�'�' ���I E ��- i
!. �
�� ��, � � � � � , ^ ' . �
+ � �t"�'i'� t��t � � �� �;�,a� ~;.. ��
y."'+_ I!b� �' r7 . + �� ��R' ��t�
* a�. ,'.�'�, � '°�, , � ,�-- .�� ra+► .,��. �.
� � ; :,
.� -�' ,�:r '� ,� ;�„'�, a " ,-;, �,. �
�, _ -„�;;� +u"
� �, � � ti . � ,� „� . .�,..,..;:�.
�c�:� a r ` `':"' .�_.. � �� �� * _ - - . . " �� °�, .
x'
` j f f f tt� � � �, �'. � � � .
���;� ��. �.(� . � .. . . .y,r *,s� : � .. .
� �,
1 ������, 'c:, � ;� ` `',�r�,,�,�. �
P� 'y q t �'� �,�' y l'� ��^Nr .xyn",' ... . .
�� ; �
4 .r,�,?: A^ � � '
... ... . ... , , �;�� .9$ _"y � ��`^M."` S'�`„tt`"ri� ':�7 I � .
�v �
+ r' � . ` t a, Szd '�' .
. . . . . � �y= �'; A�'�''i+!
JN '
.+� � � ��� �+ 3
. '
, . x.-
.,..a , . . .. _ :
...zpw;w--,,, � � w,..�. .
� "`
. . .±LC". �^_ .. '.� ... xi`°�.���t ..._. �,., .;, .
. _ , ..,... . ;3' .
,. �.'��t. � .
ir D �'. . � . � .
�. y^� 1
�: � b �.
� �+� �� �� , <
� � . , ,� t h �' ��.�
�. � °� �� �� ..
. r ; � .
i �� ° � j '��.+
` S�' �. il' • ' a �.': w
� t' .�, .,/� �r.,, � , ��
� ° ' �
.:i�'. 6 . . , � . . .
� `',r, �"f•
,. _ a '
,�°' : .i,; .
�
b S
,� ,
'� . ....� �h6 ur � . , , _ .
���:-� ,. _
i
� �
,
v-� . . �! � �' .� `, � �
: v � ,'�x`
;,.. s
�� `�. ; .
.. .. { ' . . . . . .
. -' �
i.�' .► r . ,.. ;A
+ � `' -�� ..,
. x� .
: �:,r��► .
�.�.���
v, , • �'
��� ;�~�. i,
� _
,_�'1 .
�r'
'�
n
4 �-, .
* '� ,
� � �' .e,F.
R '� ,�, ` ��1' ", t r
,r
: ;,,,�;., �
}i . , • : . it'.
if .
�
R. .,..., i4�.:�� ,F,'..?'f:'"
"�� f
�� e
".Y.�,,�� . .
�'
t
' •.
It � , � .. � � � � •�+
�� . ,
;..' t�t� , .
�� . , : :.
� -:.� : " j k. <t.�tt
.. . ' . ` i ''4i `..r. � ��S
Y
� . � V i.�' � .�
1 . ! • d
. .. �� � � F 1 + � F�i'.�*.
: .
. � ;�,�
` �� x
� ' ' '° ^ Y � ��,;yrs
� ,� ,� f �,.:
� � �: � .
�r� � y,,
�� 3P' � . _ '� F , � ,� �. �..F � �s
T k � Y
. '' x� � r. � �.
� :r • _ : a v �
r= . '' � �r� 1 It,•q .,
'{' . .. . b � �.� � �
�v� , �
^� � � �
gg Y' S y`Y _
'Y�7�.' , � �'���' y,..
f
r ;�, y� �:��i,�°
i ��,� ��Yf'
;ti.'. , ,�i.
� ,�� �
�-;: ' ` + << �'�'
� ��
:� `�1 � ��
6 � , y.•: -. ��
a 4'+ i
+k .�1' . . . p
7��y,� � ��.
�d<,ra;�".
,j.:; s �'` �. ;i� .�F .
G�. �Y 1
` �.'4' ej� . .
� y ;- ��'� +.'e� F (1 , :
wY .� �� �'� � �, � i ;
f �y,t'lM : i
7
�,y �< . . . � a3 , .k c
Y��� .� � �
.±v.+k,w+•
fi �` N}`'Y' � i h�i Y.Y: P
. �' :�t � ' i� '
�3�:• . ,�^ . 7: � �
€i �'� A' ' �Y, a^
; s ` < k'
� ° ,� t r
� 3 ly�S 1 . {� i 2`•SI�}� ' jt i..�
Y x h,
� �1�"�e�atv6. . � .{��'y� �• f� �.,
. �� _ �- .,�a' y� .
s ; �s
�...- . r �x �� .
._�, � �* ' � iti.
`, y n K� ;.
` � t -� l
. � � ���, � ��, ���.
� :
,d ti� �
1�.. .:q .P %,
� �
�' � �
�: �� .
t � �.. � z } •
i. _ �: �� ' �� �
�j# g, t.' �.s��� �::
4£ x F��E±""k ��• e„ ��k LS
::: y `.:' "": C . :�. :.
m . Z ;
'` �r- '�
.. y.
Tr�.
�: -.i
.- " '
* si `- rY. . -�
....,.�: ..
_ � � _�
� { �....,,,:a �' � _ �� : �
y �� s:.ns�,�`' ' p - . . S�.r ��.,.
���td r ? � �'i
9'� .. � .. . . �.; , . . .
� _ ''�-". .,."�'r°'* '
3 � �� �i�
icv'�°�
, _. .,
- '-.a;+-• � . ",� - . _ -
, �
�; � .— :����,-
`�-�.� *�� s�r _,..._-%:�-„"'"'
� � N �. � �
,a ��k� ' � ' � � � �
� � . , �,�.,,.
�I ��=. .�PS` � ..b ' e. ' `�.i�` � : + � . .
�' �� ' ;�{ }� �:' �� � �� � ��.�� �� � 4 � ` , ._ .
�'�`2� � µ�II y; .� � � .�{�� T '�t'' . .
.y� ,/�t'..� `� �i� `� . � . .� ' . , , ..
'P rt ��j '' . ��s�/' � �r � . ,Y.: ' l
�� e4r 'C !�� .� 'i. � '�+rl•"•'�°r7� . � `,t� •
. - � . . w 7 '+ �1' �''a,�� - �
- - .. �' �.r+ � � _ ��' �, ,, �rt�,t3 ���- T:a�'7
; - =-�r�,��.,�� , �,
� � . . � "" ,� _ •
.� .a_ �. � : .-- ___�// .
,.. .,. . _„. - .. _. � � r ' ��yq��^ r �
._.: - .: .� .. � .. . .
��:�. ..-,_ �. � �. � ���
' , � �
r. .
:.- :
. . _ . �l �� , . ,�,..
. .. � . � -� � ;'.
• _, -'} .�.�' .�:� i�-3'
r� � . . .... ; .�, - . t `
. � ._- .. . :<.._ __ . _: _,,. _ . _. , _
_ s�' •. . " .. _ % � �
y � �p -r .1, r r� � -.. L ..P� ♦ v� . . ,y� '. �y„ �'. \�'�i ! � ,? �' ' . '*
� , +� . �4+y��.� � '"� ^ p� . � y ' ,s � t � -
� �. � P a «'.� >' i .�,. � y�. .r � , - ,, j,. ` .c '�
, ��S • . � � 3� .r � . - . � 3 „ ,` - � � t± r}' � � ; ny 1 '�� J � �' N �� _
'-v �r � .a. r . ��►
.� �°'� ,� �! .�� •c' _ � , a� ✓ s . .� ?�� v= .-r �� t �,.� ,S-� �'�, `�; ++� �' -.r-.
• � � *� "� � + _ �` s �.3 � '�'.�'�` � .' .'a,. �% r f �,�s � .s �. . �
� ' �i � .. �3 � � � s,1'f
�''/t � :1, .� �i . �;i�►�' � s��3• �Jl��" �€ �'� � _ ♦
. •`f�,.> � .+�s�� ±. _ �.r � � i."_ :� � ,, - ..
. , '�i- .�. w�� ��,y � _ x. . ��'Yf . �r. �y#�'1t��,'f �� ,
„ 3. ��_ fi. '�' � { � f 3 .�i �_ ,'�:�� �"°�,:,'�j�� -� r.! '�
. � y�4 . � 'T.t.� �p � �..��ywn � � � ��~ '�} .
. �.%. �� �,.� ' qf i� f - . �� . �.y �
� T .,�y'1���, s '�� _ . �y� . ..
�fr T:s� e ��� �rJ������.� .�ty, 1�
'��+ii� .A "�`� � r .` ��1� , . - . ,- .,
• �Y
'- ".., � �. +� • .
_� � � jr � � - , ; 4 s
. �
� =�- ,� .,.�
a-� s�
� � � :: �. �J - -- -
�`,� $. .� � _ . p _ -
r _
`�, �.� �
, � ,.
. , . -,....
- ,,_ F �
--- - __ _ _�� -
__ . _
~,,,�=;,�..:: _....
Z
�
�
c
� /� +
�
6,�p0
��
,^�R
Y'
t • A� I � I �/� �
«
\ �,�Q �
�. T'� .
_ `� `
�
�o �-�.
�
�- �
-�._ �
� 1� A SURYEY OF: Lot 12, Unit 7A,
�� UNITS 6D, 7A, 7C ISLAND ESTATES
� _
� OF CLEARWATER, as recorded in
\ •�, Plat Book 64 Pages 1 and 2,
Public Records of Pinellas
c� County, Florida.
� ..
,.M �''.�• � Pinellas County Florida
'. �b,�; wv.
, �pQ, � �
ws��,� For: 6us & Joyce Saravanos
� 4
0_ � 9R`• Order No. 32753
�//J aB �'\•Y, � �� `''<< February 25, 1981 �
�
V
v
�
/ �
� , � rE € ���� � � _ . . ..
�_„K 1' ti�Y,
� �'R�i✓ � � � � � ��d 11eue� and ��oaocia.leo f ��c.
. �
,+� iT, r[TERSOURG NUGl07N CL6ARWATER
o� ctA�— �
7sAYVpY11 1 � .i^�^.".'.`1.
0
�
T �
r�
,. , N "I'"' t /' e,
_
��� .s� �a• �� ; a�c,r
, • _ ' "'o� , ` 1=� �e
� /� �,?�`;9 'Pr -
7 . M/i��• i' �,• � . �.1
., �
�.0�CK. � ' ' � • � ' �� .
' . - - . • . '`= c.s�
, O� ���� - - . =�-:� v��
•�� , . • ..• � -� '
6' . ,.9 s PooL2.,�,,�-1 �� � g: !'�.
N� . . . • ��" � 3� . . . - • '. � ��1
a,� . _ _
. .. �
IP �"
� a°� , � ' " � . � . p��K�NG. � " �.31 ��oR ��X , � ��.
. . . / . � b ��p ` :� �' �
? ' .�}�. � . . ���` • ' ' �\ ,fY � a"�'
w '. �' - � � � '' � � Sr��r MAs� � � ''=-. �
O 9 • • � rjd0 +. �
� ` Rr M °"Rr \
Os w o �,a /�s 9. • �,
� �: • QjyE J� c�
. � �i ..
� �
�. ` ?'f O � z� �� y, s ��0� `i�
� � ? : : .- � � 3° �„ E` �`_
. - - � %
��; �, j�L- • . . . . • . ��f : • �� F � 'k'9.r
F � y ,q�.�
�\ •_ �_ . - • � " �. o •�.• 0 '4
,�3� - � � � � . � � � : . � �� .¢g'
. . - � � Da,�E . o �����=. �/8
. .�,�y�,PA� . • . . O- � �'. . .. M
.� K .
Q . . , . . . . . r � , f�/j6 • � .
i
�
�
�
�
c
� � �
O - . . , ' . • • . S�Z��� . . .
V`� � �
'?9S, RNG .s E.
N
A SURYEY OF: Lot 12, Unit 7A,
UNITS 6D, 7A, 7C ISLAND ESTATES
OF CLEARWATER, as recorded in
Plat Book 64 Pages 1 and 2,
Public Records of Pinellas
County, Florida.
Pinellas County Florida
For: Gus & Joyce Saravanos
'''g`.
� � �ys�„� Order _No. 32753
- : �. � � .�:o = 4 February 25, 1981 �
�- . ' �- �
,
O
ti
V
�
�
� � . � . . - i
q �.' - ' . ' . -. - - - � E Gv'`e� � ,
. �' r P . . � � . - - . � � � J� � EMBOSSED W(TM SEA!
��.� �r, z �.: . o . � . � : � . o, .. - . . `R�� � �P �2ed �eue�
� `� LP . . . . �s � 6� and ��aocia.�ea, �nc.
�� n�cAGi � ST. PETERSBURG M13pS��AS CLEARWATER
O
P� �
R ZEPHYRN I LLS
11,A��o �e1�' aa � m • .
, �•
/�° /l .
FlORIOA�vRVEY�pR'S liEG'N. NO, eZ7
FlAR10A ENGINEER'S REG'N. NO 3896
.. � . n�i _ . _