Loading...
05/22/2013 MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING MINUTES CITY OF CLEARWATER May 22, 2013 Present: Duane Schultz Chair James E. Strickland Vice-Chair Michael Boutzoukas Board Member Sheila Cole Board Member Sue A. Johnson Board Member Michael J. Riordon Board Member Wayne Carothers Board Member Also Present: Andy Salzman Attorney for the Board Camilo Soto Assistant City Attorney Nicole Sprague Secretary to the Board Patricia O. Sullivan Board Reporter The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. In a prerecorded statement, the Chair outlined the procedures and stated any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty days of the execution of the order. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —April 24, 2013 Member Johnson moved to approve the minutes of the regular Municipal Code Enforcement Board meeting of April 24, 2013, as submitted in written summation to each board member. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 3. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD RE ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 Case 12-13 Status Check re 4/24/13 Order Britta Kolar 1742 Sunset Drive Docks/Exterior Surfaces/Doors &Windows — Franco Inspector Franco reported that property owner Britt Kolar is a civilian employee at a military base and does not qualify for the Soldier Relief Act. Inspector Franco advised her re violations. Code Enforcement 2013-05-22 1 4.2 Case 15-13 —Continued from April 24, 2013 World United Investments LLC 1501 Farrier Trl Exterior Surfaces — Fletcher No one was present to represent the owner. Inspector Vicki Fletcher provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on March 11, 2013, following the first inspection. Violations at 1501 Farrier Trail relate to exterior surfaces. Property photographs on May 16, 2013 showed exterior surfaces with mold and peeling paint. Inspector Fletcher recommended compliance by June 24, 2013 or a fine of$100 per day be imposed. Member Cole moved to find the Respondent in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Member Boutzoukas moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before June 24, 2013. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$100 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Assistant City Attorney Camilo Soto submitted composite exhibits. This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on May 22, 2013, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that exterior surfaces have mold and peeling paint. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section(s) 3-1502.13, as referred in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code by June 24, 2013. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$100.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Vicki Fletcher, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Code Enforcement 2013-05-22 2 Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of May 2013, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.3 Case 16-13 —Continued from April 24, 2013 Casey Simmons 612 S. Hillcrest Avenue Public Health, Safety or Welfare Nuisance—Anderson Case 16-13 was continued automatically to June 26, 2013. 4.4 Case 17-13 Louis J. & Angeline Chaconas 1732 Drew Street Sidewalk Signs/Signage without Permits —Weaver Inspector Mary Jo Weaver provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on March 23, 2013, following the first inspection. Violations at 1732 Drew Street relate to unpermitted sidewalk signs more than two feet from the business; most do not meet design criteria. Property photographs on September 11, 2012, January 30, February 7, April 17, and May 10, 2013 showed unpermitted illegal sidewalk signs most more than two feet from the business' wall. Property photographs on April 3, 2013, showed an unpermitted sidewalk sign and unpermitted prohibited sidewalk signs, most more than two feet from the business' wall. A property photograph on May 21, 2013, showed no sidewalk signs. Property owner Louis Chaconas admitted to the violation. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Weaver recommended compliance by May 29, 2013 or a fine of$100 per day per violation be imposed. Code Enforcement 2013-05-22 3 Mr. Chaconas said he is part owner of the property; the person running the restaurant when his mother was sick had displayed the signs. He complained that City sign regulations are unfair, change often, and should be modified so that small Clearwater businesses can compete fairly with businesses in nearby communities. Member Riordon moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before May 29, 2013. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$100 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits. This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on May 22, 2013, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that unpermitted and unlawful sidewalk signs were located more than two feet from a business wall. A representative of the Respondent(s) was present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Sections 3-1804.J, 3-1807.113.4, 3-1807.B.4.a, 3-1807.b.4.b.ii, 3-1807.B.4.c.i, and 4-1002, as referred in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code by May 29, 2013. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$100.00 per day for each day the violations continue to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Mary Jo Weaver, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Code Enforcement 2013-05-22 4 Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of May 2013, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.5 Case 18-13 Goodkids Village, Inc. 2881 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Signage without Permits/Attached Signs in Non-Residential Districts—Weaver Inspector Mary Jo Weaver provided a PowerPoint presentation. Notices of violation were issued on June 11, 2012, February 11, and March 26, 2013, following the first inspection. Violations at 2881 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard relate to unpermitted attached signage. Property photographs on March 7, 2012 showed unpermitted attached signage larger than permitted by Code. Property photographs on February 6, April 17, and May 21, 2013 showed no change. Ryan Higgins, business manager for Hope International Ministries, admitted to the violation. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Weaver recommended compliance by June 26, 2013 or a fine of$200 per day be imposed. Planner III Matt Jackson said in response to an application submitted in June 2012, staff approved a larger sign through the Comprehensive Sign Program in December 2012. A permit application is required; the permit would be valid until December 2013. The sign program approval allows the top portion of signage to remain; everything below "thrift shop" needs to be removed. Mr. Higgins apologized, stating the first sign company he hired did not obtain a permit. He said he gave permission to that company to submit a Comprehensive Sign Program application, but they had provided him no information regarding the submittal or approval. He reviewed his discussions with City staff and said he will work with his new sign company to comply with Code. He requested additional time as the approved sign is incorrect as the words at the bottom of the sign need to remain. He said altering the sign will be costly. Concern was expressed that the Comprehensive Sign Program application did not reflect the property owner's wishes. Mr. Jackson estimated processing a new permit would take 3 to 8 weeks. Ms. Weaver said the sign has been out of compliance for 15 months. Member Riordon moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before June 26, 2013. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$200 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. Code Enforcement 2013-05-22 5 It was requested that the motion be amended to provide the property owner additional time. The amendment was not accepted as it was felt the property owner has had sufficient time and easily could make changes necessary to meet Code. It was noted that the property owner is a charity and its resources should not be wasted on making multiple changes to the sign. Member Boutzoukas moved to amend the motion to require the Respondent to correct the violation on or before July 6, 2013. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Upon the vote being taken, the amended motion carried unanimously. Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits. This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on May 22, 2013, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that the unpermitted attached sign is larger than allowed by Code. A representative of the Respondent(s) was present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Sections 4-1002 & 3-1807.113.3.a, as referred in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code by July 6, 2013. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$200.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Mary Jo Weaver, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Code Enforcement 2013-05-22 6 Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of May 2013, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 4.6 Case 19-13 -Withdrawn Brightwater Blue Resort LLC 184 Brightwater Drive Public Nuisance Condition/Abandoned Buildings—O'Neil Case 19-13 was withdrawn. 4.7 Case 20-13 —Withdrawn/ Brightwater Blue Resort LLC 190 Brightwater Drive Public Nuisance Condition/Abandoned Buildings—O'Neil Case 19-13 was withdrawn. 4.8 Case 21-13 Jaggers C. Keene 1020 Charles Street Building Permit— Swinton Inspector Sam Swinton provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on March 28, 2013, following the first inspection. Violations at 1020 Charles Street relate to a partially constructed, unpermitted shed. Synopsis: 1) 2/7/11 —original permit issued; 2) 9/20/11 —Stop Work order issued after inspection determined work was beyond permit scope; 3) 1/12/13— permit expired; and 4) staff denied new permit applications. The structure is not permitted, does not meet code, passed no inspections, and cannot be permitted as constructed. Property photographs on October 6, 2011 showed framing for a shed that is taller than the house. A recent photo showed the framing is covered with plastic. Property owner Jaggers Keene denied the violation. He said his contractor had submitted incorrect drawings, began construction, and then abandoned the project. He said he hired a design engineer and has had multiple meetings with staff to modify the design to meet Code. He admitted the project surpassed the scope of the permit and a technical violation exists. He said flexible standards in the Code are subject to interpretation. Member Riordon moved to find the Respondent in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Swinton recommended compliance by June 5, 2013 or a fine of$250 per day be imposed. Code Enforcement 2013-05-22 7 Building Official Kevin Garriott said none of the plans submitted after the Stop Work order was approvable. The City recommends removing the unfinished structure; the permit was issued more than two years ago. Approval of new plans for a structure outside the setback would take a week. Planner III Mark Parry reviewed Development Code flexibility criteria for the zoning district; the last two applications were inconsistent with those criteria. It is possible to meet Code if structure is removed from the setback and the structure is attached to the house as an air- conditioned addition. Property owner Keene said new plans reflect those changes and were to be submitted today, however the engineer was injured last night. Designer Richard Badders discussed previous submittals and said this application is for a straight building permit. He suggested approval may take longer than one week. Concern was expressed that requiring the unfinished structure to be razed by June 5 seemed aggressive, especially if a portion is salvageable. Discussion ensued regarding time necessary to issue a permit. It was felt the property owner has made efforts and the item should be continued to provide time for a permit to be issued. Member Riordon moved to continue Case 21-13 to June 26, 2013. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits. 4.9 Case 22-13 Jose & Josefina Rodriguez 600 Vine Avenue Exterior Surfaces — Franco No one was present to represent the owner. Inspector Peggy Franco said a relative of the owner had been present but left earlier. Inspector Franco provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on May 18, 2012, following the first inspection. Two structures are at 600 Vine Avenue; violations for the corner house relate to exterior surfaces. Property photographs on November 7, 2012 and March 19, 2013 showed exterior surfaces have peeling and faded paint and bare wood. Property photographs on April 22, and May 10, and 22, 2013 showed some changes but building materials remain on the roof and more work is needed. She reported the property owner said work would be completed but he needed more time. She said extenuating circumstances affecting the homeowners delayed City enforcement. Member Boutzoukas moved to find the Respondent in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Inspector Franco recommended compliance by June 27, 2013 or a fine of$100 per day be imposed. Code Enforcement 2013-05-22 8 Member Riordon moved to enter an order requiring the Respondent to correct the violation on or before June 27, 2013. If the Respondent does not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$100 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits. This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on May 22, 2013, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT Based upon the testimony and evidence received, it is evident that exterior surfaces have peeling and faded paint and bare wood. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) is/are in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section 3-1502.113, as referred in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of the Board that the Respondent(s) shall comply with said Section(s) of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code by June 27, 2013. If Respondent(s) does/do not comply within the time specified, the Board may order a fine of$100.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist. Upon complying with said Section(s) of the Code, the Respondent(s) shall notify Inspector Peggy Franco, who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. If the Respondent(s) fails/fail to comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real property owned by the Respondent(s), pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of May 2013, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. Code Enforcement 2013-05-22 9 4.10 Case 23-13 Jose & Josefina Rodriguez 600 Vine Avenue Exterior Surfaces - Franco No one was present to represent the owner. Inspector Peggy Franco provided a PowerPoint presentation. A notice of violation was issued on May 18, 2012, following the first inspection. Two structures are at 600 Vine Avenue; this house is on the second lot. Violations relate to exterior surfaces. Property photographs on April 22, 2013 showed the structure had unpainted bare wood. Property photographs on May 1 and May 10, 2013 showed a portion of the house was painted. Property photographs on May 22, 2013 showed painting was completed and the property was in compliance with Code prior to today's meeting. Member Cole moved to find the Respondent was in violation of the City of Clearwater Code as referred to in the affidavit in this case. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Member Cole moved to enter an order that no fine be imposed against the Respondent. If the Respondent repeats the violation, the Board may order a fine of up to $100 for each day the violation continues to exist after the Respondent is notified of the repeat violation. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits. This case came before the City of Clearwater Code Enforcement Board on May 22, 2013, after due notice to the Respondent(s), and having heard testimony under oath and received evidence, the Board issues the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the testimony and evidence received, it is evident the condition existed; however, it is further evident this condition was corrected prior to this hearing. The Respondent(s) was/were not present. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Respondent(s) was/were in violation of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section 3-1502.13 as referred to in the Affidavit in this case. ORDER It is the Order of this Board that no fine will be imposed against the Respondent(s). The Board further orders that if Respondent(s) repeats/repeat the violation referenced herein, the Board may order the Respondent(s) to pay a fine up to $100.00 for each day the violation exists after the Respondent(s) is/are notified of the repeat violation. Should the violation reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. Code Enforcement 2013-05-22 10 The Respondent may request a rehearing of the decision of the Board, in writing, and delivered to the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the postmark of the written order. A request for rehearing shall be based only on the ground that the decision was contrary to the evidence or that the hearing involved an error on a ruling of law which was fundamental to the board's decision. The written request for rehearing shall specify the precise reasons therefor. Upon receipt of a request for rehearing, the Board shall determine whether or not to rehear the matter; the Board will not hear oral argument or evidence when making this decision. Any aggrieved party may appeal a final Order of the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Order to be appealed or after final disposition of the request for rehearing of the Order to be appealed. Florida Statute 286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of May 2013, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 5.1 Case 26-12 Affidavit of Compliance First M Corp Defined Benefit 708 Chestnut Street Exterior Surfaces —Weaver 5.2 Case 07-13 Affidavit of Compliance VJ706MAPLE LLC 401 Palm Is NE Door &Window Openings - Franco 5.3 Case 48-12 Affidavit of Non-Compliance Clearwater Espacio Dev LLC 1100 Cleveland Street Public Nuisance Condition/Abandoned Bldg —Schaar 5.4 Case 08-13 Affidavit of Non-Compliance James & Donna Dean 405 S. Comet Avenue Ext. Storage/Public Nuisance Condition/Lot Clearing Violation/Fences &Walls - Schaar Member Johnson moved to accept the Affidavits of Compliance for Cases 26-12 and 07- 13 and to accept the Affidavits of Non-Compliance and issue Orders imposing fines for Cases 48- 12 and 08-13. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 6. NEW BUSINESS: 6.1 Case 57-12 — Lien Reduction Request Michael T. & Laura Holzwarth Home Equity Asset Trust 2002-01 US Bank Natl. Assn. Tre. c/o/Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. Code Enforcement 2013-05-22 11 303 N. Highland Avenue Exterior Surfaces - Phillips Jerry Sigler of Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. said he is the broker for the bank that owns the property following foreclosure. He said the property is in compliance and requested that the lien be reduced. Staff reported the lien is $6,600; administration costs total $1,353.20. Member Carothers moved to enter an order reducing the fine for Case 57-12 to administration costs of$1,353.20, payable within 60 days or the lien will revert to its original amount. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Attorney Soto submitted composite exhibits. The Municipal Code Enforcement Board has considered the Respondent's request for reconsideration of fine at a hearing held on May 22, 2013, and based upon the evidence presented, enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. After considering the request for reduction of fine filed by the Respondent(s) and considering that the property is now in compliance, it is evident that a reduction in fine is appropriate in the above-referenced case. It is the Order of this Board that the fine previously imposed in the Order of the Board dated February 27, 2013, as recorded in O.R. Book 17916, Pages 2107-2110, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby reduced to administration costs of$1,353.20 payable to the Petitioner by July 21, 2013. If the reduced fine is not paid within the time specified in this Order, a lien in the original amount of$6,600.00 shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of May 2013, at Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. 7. NUISANCE ABATEMENT LIEN FILINGS Thomas W. Martin PNU2012-01525 1267 Pierce Street 15-29-15-38574-008-0060 $272.42 Lisa Lewis PNU2012-01946 1138 Engman Street 10-29-15-33552-004-0520 $200.00 Kendra T. Blanks PNU2012-02027 1357 Springdale Street 10-29-15-69066-004-0050 $200.00 Roosevelt Freeman PNU2012-02108 1408 Pennsylvania Avenue 10-29-15-51948-003-0010 $447.84 Code Enforcement 2013-05-22 12 Kristi & James Hazel 1621 Drew Street 14- 29 -15- 46566- 001 -0060 PNU2012 -02172 $399.17 Charlene Battle PNU2013 -00026 1120 Palm Bluff Street 10- 29 -15- 33552 - 006 -0430 $200.00 Maya Ellie Hamblet PNU2013 -00058 502 Palm Bluff Street 09- 29 -15- 65466- 000 - 0060 $423.00 Jairo A. Guzman PNU2013 -00132 1484 De Leon Street 14- 29 -15- 10476- 005 -0050 $362.00 Hillard Sanders Est. PNU2013 -00137 608 Minnesota Drive 10- 29 -15- 57420 - 000 -0220 $200.00 Jeanette Rolle & Doris Moore PNU2013 -00203 1118 LaSalle Street 10- 29 -15- 33552 - 005 -420 $393.00 Charlene Battle PNU2013 -00227 1120 Palm Bluff Street 10- 29 -15- 33552 - 006 -0430 $200.00 Member Boutzoukas moved to accept the Nuisance Abatement Lien filings. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: Attorney Soto reported the State modified the appeals process for red light camera infractions. The MCEB (Municipal Code Enforcement Board) has been tasked with hearing these appeals. Staff is working on rules; appeals will not be heard before August. 8. ADJOURN: Att -st: • The meeting adjourned at 3:16 p.m. ecretary for th Boar Code Enforcement 2013 -05- Chair Municipal Code Enforcement Board 13