FLS2013-06022�.
� � ��
� ��;;° �� � �� � = v� � � � � � �° � � � �., �� ;,
�
� ����.���� ��,� � ��.� �,���� �`y
Florida State Certified
Professional Engineering
Firm Certificate of
Authorization: 29400
iviark Parry
City of Clearwater Building Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearvvater, Florida 33756
(727) 562 4567
June 11, 2013
Re: WTT' Residence
1140 Mandalay Point, Clearvvater, FL
Case Number: FLS2013-06022
Mr. Parry,:
� 140 MAN�ALAY
FLS20� 3_06022
1
Where's the Tu��e�
Zoning� �o`^� �ensity Residential
��`�� 6~g �^�
� � ,�
�; �` �
�,'� �.�, ��''`
We are a member of the
USRr=r'
pO1NT R�
Atlas #: 227 A
Enclosed please find the following itemized list below in reference to Letter of Incompleteness received
on June 5, 2013. Starting on page 2 is a response addressing each comment as required by the City.
. (1) Original copy of the Submittal Package.
. (10) copies of the Submittal Package
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at Giacomo�SGroupfl.com
ar call at 727-645-5105
Best Regards,
Giacomo Licari, P.E.
6318 Rowan Road, New Port Richey, FL 34653
Website: www.SGROUPFL.com — Email: info@sgroupfl.com
/D1/C1 7'77 GAC C1f1C
PLANNING REVIEW (Mark Parrv1:
General Site Plan and Application Comments
Please provide some first and last names with regard to, at least, the agent for the property. I also
need to some Garification as to who is legally able to represent Where's the Turtle?, LLC and
therefore able to appoint Sustainability Group to act as their representative. This is the most
important comment, really, because if I cannot ascertain who is authorized to act on whose behalf I
cannot process the application.
a. Richard Flynn is the authorized Agent for Whe�e's the Turtle?, LLC which has
signed the Affidavit that assigns The Sustainability Group, LLC to act on their
behalf on this applicaiion.
2. Please include full addresses for the property owner and representative.
a. See enclosed the revised Application with the correct full address for the property
owner and the property owner representative.
3. The request inGuded with Attachment A is confusing. The requests states a reduction in the side
(north) setback from 10 feet to five feet and a reduction in the same setback from 10 feet to 7.58
feet for a balcony. Clarify what the first request is for. In addition, requests to reduce the front (east)
setback are required.
a. The first request referred to the existing building setback, it has been removed
since it refers to an existing structure and not for a proposed one. P/ease see
revised Attachment A with the additional request for the reduction of front setback
for the proposed addition and the proposed balcony.
4. The site plan appears to incorredly portray the property lines. It appears that there is a property
line, according to the submitted survey, roughly aligning with the westem edge of pavement of
Mandalay Point with a second parcel on the east side of Mandalay Point. Please revise and
resubmit a site plan which accurately shows all property lines.
a. Please see revised Site Plan Sheet C1 of Ct, the property lines have been revised
to match the survey.
5. Clarify what the south unlabeled hatched feature is on the east facade.
a. The subject feature is a box bay window. See revised Site Plan Sheet Ct of C1.
6. The rear setback is inaccurately shown. GDC Section 3-905.A provides that the coastal
construction control line is the line of reference from which setbacks shall be measured along the
Gulf of Mexico for buildings and structures. Revise the site plan to accurately show the proposed
rear setbacks.
a. P/ease see Site Plan Sheet C1 of C1 wifh �►e revised rear existing and proposed
setbacks.
7. Please provide the area of the site within the RL FLUP classification and provide the existing and
proposed ISR as related to that portion of the site.
a. Please see revised Site Data Table and Notes on Sheet C1 of C1. The proposed and
e�sting /SR are calcufated based on the RL FLU area.
8. Provide dimensioned elevations which indicate heights as measured from base flood elevation
(BFE).
a. Please see enclosed the revised Building Elevations Sheet A5 1 with the building
height measured from the base flood elevation.
6318 Rowan Road, New Port Richey, FL 34653
Website: www.SGROUPFL.com — Email: info@s�roupfl.com
(P)(F) 727-645-5105
9. Clarify what, if any, kind of fencing is located on the site. Provide materials, condition and height.
a. There no proposed fencing. There is an existing 4 feet high chain link fence along
the south properiy line. See Site Plan Sheet C1 of C1 for location.
10. Clarify the size of the house. The application states that the existing area is 6,129 square feet with
proposed as 6,955 square feet but Attachment B provided the area as 4,572 square feet.
a. The existing bui►ding square footage is 5,425 SF which includes the existing
garage and second story (598 S�. The proposed building square footage is
5,489.57 SF which a/so includes the existing garage and second story (598 S�.
Please see revised Application and Attachment "B" with the correct building
square footage.
General Applicability Criteria Comments
Criterion 1- Perhaps add a discussion as to how exactly the proposal is similar to and consistent
with adjacent properties. Include details such as what the existing setbacks are along Manda!?y
Point.
a. Please see enc/osed the revised Reiteration 1 of Ariachment "B"
2. Criterion 2- It is unclear how the proposal will serve the surrounding community. Perhaps provide a
discussion as to how the proposal is similar to surrounding homes and that the proposal will not
prevent any abutting property from developing or being improved.
a. Ptease see enc/osed the revised Reiteration 2 ofAttachment "B"
3. Criterion 3 through 6- No comments.
a. Acknowledged.
Residential Infill Project Criteria Comments
1. Criterion 1- No comment.
a. Acknowledged.
2. Criterion 2- The criterion has not been addressed. The criterion requires that a discussion as to
how the parcel is not developable without the request deviation. Perhaps a discussion as to how
the site is similar with regard to dimensions and area to other properties in the neighborhood. In
addition, the site has been developed with a single-family home also similar to other homes in the
neighborhood with regard to size and dimensions. Simply stating what the proposed improvements
are and what the setbacks will be does not address the criteria. Perhaps a narrower discussion of
how the proposal constitutes redevelopment and that redevelopment is in the form of interior and
exterior renovations in an effort to maintain and increase the value of the home thereby positively
contributing to the value of the neighborhood and is warranted. In addition, it may be worthwhile to
discuss, at this point at the least, how most of the proposed encroachments into the front (east)
setback do not encroach any farther than the existing footprint of the home and that redevelopment
the selected portions of the house without encroaching into the already encroached-upon front
setback would be impractical.
a. Please see revised Criterion 2 of the Attachment "C"
3. Criterion 3- Clarify how the redevelopment of the propeRy will increase the architectural look.
Clarify what an architectural look is. Clarify how, exa�tly, will increase the overall value and look of
the abutting property. Keep in mind that all that is required is that one does not reduce the value of
abutting property not necessarily increase them. It may warrant a discussion as to how the proposal
is similar to abutting properties with the assumption that what i� similar should not be detrimental.
a. Please see revised Criterion 3 of the Attachment "C"
6318 Rowan Road, New Port Richey, FL 34653
Website: www.SGROUPFL.com — Email: info@s�roupfl.com
(P)(F) 727-645-5105
4. Criterion 4 through 5- No comment.
a. Acknowledged.
5. Criterion 6- Again, ciarify exactly how the architectural look will be improved. Again, a discussion
as to how the proposal will specifically improve the property and how the improvements are similar
to surrounding homes. You may want to talk about the extent to which the proposed additions
protrude farther than the existing building into the front and/or side setback as applicable or not, as
the case may be.
a. Please see revised Criterion 6 of the Aitachment "C"
6. Criterion 7- While in many ways ! do not necessarily d9sagreP With ths meat �f your respo!?�e +.�
this criteria and, as factually accurate as it may be, it may be worthwhile, considering that your
submittal is a public record open to scrutiny by anyone, to slightly revise the response. Perhaps a
brief discussion, once again, regarding how the proposal will be consistent with the character of the
existing home as well as surrounding homes.
a. Please see revised Criterion 7 of the Attachment "C"
7. Criterion 8- This criterion is, in fact, applicable and needs to be addressed.
a. Please see revised Criterion 8 of the Attachment "C"
6318 Rowan Road, New Port Richey, FL 34653
Website: www.SGROUPFL.com — Email: info@s�roupfl.com
(P)(F) 727-645-5105
� (� Planning & Development Department
Y L�ii��.��� Fiexible Standard Development Application
-- ;�� ,�,.�''.-�,,�,�.� Detaci�ed Dwellings, Duplexes orAssociated Accessory Use/Structures
IT tS INCUMBEiVT U�ON TFiE APPttCANt i0 SUBMtT COMPtEi'E AIVO CORREC7 iiVFORMAt10N. ANY MIStEADtN6, DECEPTIVE,
INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATIOPI MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION.
ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETEIY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIE51
TO THE PLANNIN6 & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE.
A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES} AS REQUIRED WITIilN
ARE TO BE SUBMfTTED FOR REVtEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVtEW COMMITTEE. P[ANS AND APPLICAT(ONS ARE REQU(RED
TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS.
THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200
APPLICATION FEE• $Z00 (if fnr detached drMel/ings or duplexes) OR
$100 (if for accessory uses/structures for detached dw�ellings/duplexes)
PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): ��e'S �'�le 'j'urt]e� j,j.,C / R1C1C F1yilII aS AUthOTiZeC� A�eIIt
MAILING ADDRESS: j 3SO AVeIlUe Of t�le A111eT1C1S 1 Stll FL�New �ork NY 10019
PHONE NUMBER: gl%-43g-39$f)
EMAIt:
AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
EMAIL:
(];.,.....,�,n i ir�ri nr Rirhar� T Mar[�Pl �vith ThP Custainabiltv TO �_ I.I.0
,�.. ��� . ., - -- ,
6318 Rowan Road New Port Richey FL 34653
727-645-S1Q5
giacomo@SGroupfl.com; richard a SGroupfl.com _
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1140 MaTiC�SlaY POlIlt. CIeBTWat�I'. FL 33767
PARCEL NUMBER(5): 3Z-Zg-1 S-S4%OZ-OOO-OI OO
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S�e AL�Ched
PROPOSE� usE(s�: Sin�le Family Home
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See attachment "A"
�pecifically identify the requesf
(include aN requested mde Jlexibility;
e.g., redudion in required number of
parking spaces, height, setback� lot
size, lot width, specific use, etc.):
Planning 8� Developrnent Deparirne�,100 S. Myrtie Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 7Z7-562�56T; Fax^727-562�d865
° r�vater
����
= � �-
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Standard Development Application
Data Sheet
PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWIN6 INFORMATIUN IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM
WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPUCATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLEfE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWIPIG
APPLICATION CYCLE.
ZON1N6 t�fST�tICT:
FUTURE CANi} USE PLAN {3ESiGNATIUN:
EXISTING USF (currently existing on site):
"LDR" Low Density Residential; "OS/R" Open Space / Recreational District
"RL" Residential Lov��; "P" Preser`,�ation District
Single Family
PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): Single Family
SITE AREA: 18�181.49 SF j*1 �• ft•
GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings):
Existing: ,�,425_00 sq. ft.
Proposed: 5,467.76 sq• �•
Maximum Allowable: �_2']2.6Q sq. �.
0.42 AC j*1 acres (*) �thin the RL FLUP
GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be muftiple uses):
First use: 5_467_7b �• ft•
Second use: N�A sq. ft.
Third use: NIA sq. ft.
FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of ali buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: 0 30
Proposed: 0.30
Maximum Allowable: � a�
BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1�` floor square footage of all buildings):
Existing: 4,827.00 sq• ft• i 26.54 % of site)
Proposed: 4,891 _57 sq. ft. ( 2�, qp °� of site)
Maximum Permitted: 7�2'72,60 �• �• � 30.00 °.6 of site)
GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICUlAR USE ARFA (green space within the parking !ot and interior of site; not perimeter b�ffer):
Existing: N�A sq. ft. ( °% of site)
Proposed: N/q sq. ft. ( °.G of site)
VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aistes, loading area):
Existing: N/A sq. ft. (
Proposed: N/A sq. ft. (
°� of sitej
°� of site)
Planning & Development Departmerrt,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727�62�567; Fax: 727-562�4865
� Planning & Development Department
;- �, �,'�.�t��e� Flexible Standard Development Application
✓, � ������r
Site Plan Submittal Package Check list
IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT �FIS) APPLIfATION, ALL FLS APPLICATIONS FOR Q
SINGLE-FAMILY DET�4CHED DWELLING, DUPLIX, OR ACCESSORY USE/STRUCTURE ASSOGIATED WITH EITHER A SIN6lE-FAMILY
DETACHED DWELLING OR DUPLEX SHALL INCLUDE A PLOT PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
❑ Responses to the General Applicability criteria as set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Standard Development
Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses.
❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the
subject property is located. The attached Flexible Standard Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to
provide these responses.
0 A signed and sealed survey of the properry prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property,
dimensions, acreage, location of all current structuresJimprovements, location of all public and private easements including
official records book and page numbers and street right(sj-of-way within and adjacent to the site.
❑ tf the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as
provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5.
❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar
marine structure, then the appl'tcation must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional
engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair
or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on
private and commerciai docks.
❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH (diameter at breast height), and species on the parcel proposed for development
with a DBH of four inches or more and identifying those trees proposed to be removed.
❑ A site plan with the following information:
❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared.
❑ Location of the Coastal Construdion Control Line (CCCLj, whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard
Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable.
❑ Location, setbacks and use of all existing and proposed building and structures.
❑ Location of all existing and proposed parking areas, sidewalks and driveways.
❑ Location, type of material and height of all existing and proposed fences.
❑ Location of all existing and proposed utilities, induding water, sewer, gas, a�d stormwater.
❑ Location of all existing utility easements, including Official Records book and page numbers, and any proposed utility
easements.
❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height, building materials, and rnncealment of
all mechanical equipment located on the roof.
Planning 8� Development DepartmeM,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Cl�rwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562�567; Fax^T27�62d865
il
� � �ar�ater
u� ,��,..,�...,^�,�.�'",,v�r
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Standard Development Application
General Applicability Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX [6j 6ENER�►L A►PPLICABiIJTY CRITERfA EXPiAiPiii�iG HQW, iN D€itlit, Tric
CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL.
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent
properties in which it is located.
See Attached "B"
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings
or significantly impair the value thereof.
See Attached "B"
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health ar safety or pers4ns residing or working in the n�igh4orhoQd
of the proposed use.
See Attached "B"
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
See Attached "B"
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the narcel proposed for
development.
See Attached "B"
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of
operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
See Attached "B"
Planning 8� Developrr�ent Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727�62.M15567; Fax^727-562�865
� (� Planning & Development Department
�� l� �tl��t�r Flexible Standard Development Application
� ��`'M�'� Flexibility Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPEGFIC USE(S) BEiNG REQUESTED AS SET
FORTH IN THE ZONIN6 DISTRICT(S) IN WHIQi THE SUBIECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. IXPLAIN HOW, IN DEfAIL, EACH CRITERION
IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARI�.
1 See Attached "C"
2. See Attached "C"
3. See Attached "C"
4_ See Attached "C"
s See Attached "C"
6 See Attached "C"
�. See Attached "C"
8 See Attached "C"
Pl�ning 8 Development Depa�trnent,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562�567; Fax^T27-562�865
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire s[te):
Ex�st�ng. � d6
Proposed: 0.44
Maximum Permitted: n �5
DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre):
Existing: 1 Unit
ProRased: 1 Unit
Maximum Permitted: 1 Unit
OFF-STREET PARKING:
Existing: 2 Spaces
Proposed: 2 Spaces
Minimum Required: 2 Spaces
BUItDING HEIGHT:
Existing:
Proposed:
Maximum Permitted:
10'-7" (from Base Flood Elevation)
13'-4" (from Base Flood Elevation)
30�-On
Note: A pprking demand study must be provided /n conjunction with any request
to reduce the omount of required off streei porking spaces. Please see the
adopted Porking Demand Study Guidelines for further information.
WHAT tS TFlE ESTIMATED TOTAL VAWE OF THE PROIECT UPON COMPLETION? $ 650,000.0(?
ZONING DISTRICTS fOR ALL AQlACENT PROPERTY:
North: "LDR" Low Density Residential; "OS/R" Open Space / Recreational District
south: "LDR" Low Density Residenrial; "OS/R" Open Space / Recreational District
East: 'P" Preservahon Distnct
West: "P" Preservation District
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this �2"�h day of
representations made in this applica#ion are true and T � _
accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize --`�- —�_• to me andJor by
�ty representatives to visit and photograph the �a 1 Q CD Id�D s. L. i CCi r i who is personally known has
property described in this application.
� n produced__ �L ����L,'b Li „��,p asidentification.
�
o# property owner or representative
��pY P � I
;20�� �«��= LINELYSOTO
. .: Notary Public - State of florida
=N` : P„ My Comm. Expires Dec 8, 2014
- a o,.
��'%',FOFF�o;� Commission # EE 48005
mm�"
commission expires:
��1>RY pV � .
, o a:�•. LINELY SOTO
. �,
'r� ._ Notary Fublic - State of Florida ;
:•« •'c
:�, o;; My Comm. Expires Dec 8, 2� 5
��'o;FO�� �d;:� Commission # EE 48r-
Planning & Developmer�t peparbnerrt,100 S. Myrtte Avenue, Clearwaber, FL 33756, Tel: 727-�62-466T; Fax: 727-562-4865
� :Planning & Developmeat Department
� . � ���� : `b e Standard i�ev�l�r n�ent ,� lica�o�.
� � �� _ . _ _ �lex� 1 P pP : _
� Affida�t to Au�horize Ag�nt�Representative
1. Prt�vide names of aii pfoperty owrters an deed — PRiNT ftill names:
wb��g�r�e�.rJ:c / Richard Flynn as authorized representafive.
`,
2. That (t amJwe a�e} the ownef(s) and record'titEe fiaider(s), ofthe ioflawing descrihed property:
w,�'sTheTmUe?,LI.0 See Legal Descriptian
3. That this properky consiitutes the properiy for whith a request for (describe requestj:
See Attachment A -
4. That the undersigned (has/havej appoir�ted and (daes/doj appotrtts
Richazd J Marcel or Giacomo Licari w/ The Sustainabliry Group, LI.0
as:(hiz/their) agent(s} to �ecute any petitians ar other docum�nts necessary to af€ecc such petition;
5. ihai this affid�v+t has been executed to induce the CiLy of Gearwater, Flarida to consider and att on the above described
ProPertS+:
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by'Gty representath+es ir► order to prc�e5s this application and'the owner
authorizes Gtty representativ�s to visi� and photagraph the proper�y descxibed in this appi�cation;
7. Yhat (f/w , the unde 'gned hort y, t�e�eby certiiy that the fo�egoing is true and correct.
� : �`
PrapertY Owner Property Owrer
Properiy �wne� P%perty Ow�ter
STATE U� FL�IiiDA, C4UNTY OF PilVE�.LAS
BE�4RE ME THE UND�,FtStGNED, AN QFFiCER DL1LY COMMIBStpNED SY TNE LAWS OF THE STATE E3F Fl.OFtIQA. ON
Ti-!!S %��„� _ D?rY OF V�, � � C3 (�` , PER54NALLY APPEARED
� C� G�. C� ��� WHO HAV{NG BEEN FiRS'� Olit.Y SWORN
DEROSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FUU.Y tJNDERSTA1�tDS T#�{E COfitTEfdTS O� 'CHE AFFIDAVCi TNAT NE/SNE'StGNEQ.
KIM K. S�HUTZ �../
NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New ` � t�`�._ �
No. O1SC5029237 � `.`�) t �
Quatified i n N a s s a u C o u N o t a ry P ubEic Si gr�ature
' Cammissian Expires June i3�f �
Notary Seai/S#amp My Commission E�ires' � tP f 13 � 1�
PlanMt� & tievelaprt�ent Cepartrnent,' 100 3, Myrtla Avenue, Glaa�r, fL 33T88, Tei; t2T.66�•43�67; Fax::12T-562-4B5S
Paga T oiT ltaYised f�#t72
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL 1:
LOTS 10, 10A, 11, 11A, AND N. 1/2 OF LOT 9 AND 9A, FIRST ADDITION TO
MANDALAY POINT SUB., ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 71, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 2
NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER THE
TRACTS MARKED PALMER-HAYWARD RESERVED ON THEPLATS OF MANDALAY
POINT SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 68, AND FIRST ADDITION TO MANDALAY
POINT SUB., ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 71, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTRY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 3:
THAT LAND LYING BETWEEN THE WATERS OF THE GULF OF MEXICO, AND THE
WESTERLY WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE FOLLOWING:
(LOTS 10, 10A, 11, 11A, AND N 1/2 OF LOT 9 AND 9A, FIRST ADDITION TO
MANDALAY POINT SUB., ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK20, PAGE 71, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS
COUNTY, FLORIDA), THE NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY BOUNDARIES OF THE
ABOVE PARCEL EXTENDED OF THE NORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY
BOUNDARIES OF THE ABOVE PARCEL EXTENDED WESTERLY TO THE WATERS
OF THE GULF OF MEXICO.
ATTACHMENT A
DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS
The subject property is located at 1140 Mandalay Point on North Clearwater Beach. 1'he project
consists of an existing residential structure within Mandalay Point's Homeowner's Associarion being
renovated to include the addition of 64.57 SF of conditioned covered area and 1,598.31 SF covered
patio and porch areas. The subject property contains (4) full plus two-half Lots as depicted on the
survey. Along the eastern property line (front setback) contains a"non-Exclusive" easement for
ingress/egress access onto Mandalay Point The property falls within the City of Clearwater's Low
Density Residential (LDR) and Open Space / Recrearional District (OS/R). Mandalay point
subdivision is a gated community located on the northern portion of Clearwater Beach. Homes within
the community are similar in character, bulk with reduced setbacks to most of their property lines.
'I'!te scope includes remodeling of the eacisting structure for both interior and e�rterior elements
including the reconfigurarion of screened porches areas (rear of the building) covered entry porch
and covered verandah (at the front of the building�. The balcony above the e�risting garage facing
Mandalay Point is proposed to be removed and replaced and increasing the area of approacimate 20
SF. Site improvements include the addition of an enclosed Verandah at the front of the building and a
reconfiguration of the residence entrance from Mandalay Point The proposed covered screened
porch at the southwest corner of the building will also have a second story with an observation area
and sleeping porch. T'he proposed height for the sleeping porch and observation deck is 13'-4" from
the base flood elevation of 13.0 feet
A reduction to the north setback (side) balcony setback is being requested from 10.00 f�t. to 7.58 ft. A
reduction of the front balcony setback is being reyuested from 25.00 ft to 2.77 ft Furthermore a
reduction to front setback for the proposed verandah addition is being requested from 25.00 ft to
11.53 ft
The request includes:
. Reduction to the side setback (north) for the balcony encroachment from 10.00 ft to 7.58 ft
. Reduction to the front setback (east) for the balcony encroachment from 25.00 ft to 2." �.
. Reduction to the front setback (east) for the proposed breakfast verandah encroachment
from 25.00 ft to 11.53 ft,
ATTACHMENT B
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage,
dens'rty and character of adjxent properties in which it is bcated.
The subject property maintains and further enhances the harmony of the surrounding community
by maintaining a similar low residential intensity to adjacent properties. The proposed building
square footage is 5,489.57 square feet of covered. Low Intensity zoning allows for a maximum
FAR of 0.40. The dosest structure towards the south is approximate 6,203 square feet, with an
existi»g FAR of 0.31. The structure towards the north is approxlmate 4,302 square feet with an
FAR of 0.28. The subject property at the proposed floor area ratio (FAR) is 0.30 below other
surrounding properties by 3.346 and above of 6. T.6
ihe existing building height of the second story above the garage, is 10'-7" ft from base flood
elevotion. 7Y►e base flood elevation 13.00 feet. The maximum building height altowed within tDR
is 30 feet. �th the proposed renovations the buildirtg height for the observation deck located on
the southwest corner of the building is maintained at 13' 4" ft from the base fiood etevatior
below the alJowable 30 feet. 7tre building to the north is a one story building with approximate
height 9' above the bose flood elevotion. The closest building to the south is a two story with
approximate e►evotion of 13 feet above the base fiood elevation.
The subjed property has existing building setback to the western property line of 5.92 ft along
Mandalay Point. The existing building setback to the north (side) is S.QO feet, to the south (side) is
11.83 feet and to the west (rear) is 47.32 feet. The structure toward the north has a front setback
along Mandalay Point of approximate 8 feet, south (side) setback of 9 feet and north (side)
setback of 3 feet. The closest structure towards the south has a front setback of approximate 10
feei, south (side) setback of approximate 3 feet and north (side) setback of 21 feet. The subject
property proposed front setbacks are 2.77 feet for the second story balcony and 11.53 feet for the
proposed covered verandah. 7he subject property proposed north (side) setback for the second
story balcony is 7.58 feet.
The subject praperty proposed setbacks are similar to the existing building setbacks of the
adjacent properties.
The subject property existing architedural style is Ranch Style, the proposed renovation will be a
Key West style more in harmony with the adjacent propert+es. The proposed building color are
white-cream with a brown color roof. The existing building color for the property to the north +s a
white light calor with a white roof. The property to the sovth is undeveloped.
Overatt the redevelopment of the proposed structure will be in harmony with the bulk, scale,
density and character of the surrounding properties.
2. The proposed devebpment will not hinder or discourage the appropriate devebpment and
use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
The proposed development serves the surrounding low density residentiol community as a whole.
The building will be renovated and enhonce per City of Clearwater' Bui(ding Departmerrt and is
designed to set o high siondard, which is in harmony with the surrounding residencies.
The subject property has existing building setback to the western property line is 5.92 ft along
Mando/ay Pant. The existing building setback to the north (sideJ is 5.00 feet, to the south (side) is
11.83 feet and to the west (rear) is 47.32 feet. The structure toward the north has a front setback
along Mandalay Point of appronimate 8 feet, south (side) setback of 9 feet and north (sideJ
setback of 3 feet. The closest strurture towards the south has a front setback of approximate 10
feet, south (side) setback of approximate 3 feet and north (side) setback of 21 feet. The subject
property proposed front setbacks are 2.77 feet for the second story balcony and 11.53 feet for the
proposed mvered verandah. The subject property proposed north (side) setback for the second
story ba(cony is 7.58 feet. The subjed property proposed setbacks are similar to the existing
buildings setbacks of the adjacent properties.
Adjacent properties use(s) are singie fomily homes, which are the same as the subject property.
Furthermore, the renovation to the existing strudure only enhances the val�es of the surrounding
residences and in no way wiH hinder or impair the value of. The subject renovation maintain
minimum building setbacks and don't do not hinder visual interest of the existing rnmmunity or
prevent any abutting properties from development or being improved.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The property rs located within a private gated community within Mandalay Point Subdivision on
the northern point of Clearwater Beach. The proposed renovations will not odversely affed the
heo(th of safety of the surrounding community, since construction will be limited to the proposed
structure. Furthermore, once the renovation is complete is will only enhance the community
characteristic, while maintaining a front setback of 2.77 feet from the balcony to Mandalay
Point's ROWline.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
ihere will no increase to traffic demands, since there is no density increase to the subject
property.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The subject property is a Ranch architectural style is, the nroposed renovation wift be a Key West
style which is consistent with the community character.
The proposed building cotors off-whit%ream and brown color for the roof. The existing building
colors for the property to the north are white light for the building and white cream cotor for the
roof. The adjacent property to the south is undeveloped.
The proposed renovation has similar exterior building colors to the adjacent buitdings.
71ie subject property has existing buiJding setback to the western property line is 5.92 ft along
Mandalay Point. The subject property proposed front setbacks are 2.77 feet for the second story
balcony and 11.53 feet for the proposed covered verandah. The subject property proposed north
(side) setback for the second story balcony is 7.58 feet. Tt�e existing building setback to the north
(side) is 5.00 feet, to the south {side) is 11.83 feet and to the west (rear) is 47.32 feet. The
structure toward the north has a front setback along Mandalay Point of approximate 8 feet,
south (side) setback of 9 feet and north (side) setback of 3 feet. The adjacent property to the
south is undeveloped. The subject property proposed setbadcs are similar to the existing buitding
setbacks of the adjacent properties.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic
and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposed renovation does not have odverse effects on surrounding properties. The proposed
verandah front setback is within the existing building and will not adverse effect the visibility of
the adjacent properties. Furthermore, the subject property does not increase or contribute to any
olfactory or acoustic effeds. Hours of operation are not applicable to the subject project.
ATTACHMENT C
FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA for RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS
1. Single-family detached dwellings are the only permitted use eligible for residential infill project
application;:
a. The existing use is a detached residential dwelling ►ocated within the "LDR" tow Density
Residential, There are no proposed ci�anges to the use for redevelopment of the subjed
property.
2. The development or redevebpment of the parcel proposed for devebpmeM is otherwise
impractical without deviatans fr+am one or more of the following: intensity; other
development standards;
a. The renovation of the subject building consists of interior renovation, and the addition of
attached porch/deck area ot the rear of the building, the addition of a proposed
attached covered verandah and an entry porch at the front of the property. The
redevelopment of the property witl increose the value of the property contributing to an
increase of the val ue of the neighborhood. The existing front building setback 5.92 feet
which is tees then the minimum of 25.00 feet. The proposed covered verandah front
setback is 11.53 feet which is Iess than the existing building setback.
The addition of any existing structures at the front of the building is not pradical without
encroaching the required building setback, being the existing building already within the
minimum front setback. The proposed covered verandah addition +s further west the
existing structure setback.
The subject structure side setback (north) is 5 feet and the existing second story balcony
north (side) setback is 7.65 feet. The existing second story balcony is proposed to be
removed and replaced with a wider and deeper balcony of 20 SF additional area, the
proposed second story balcony side setbock is 7.58 feet, with an overafl side setback
decrease less than one inch. The existing second story balcony front setback is 3.2 feet.
The proposed second story front setback is 2.77 feet with a setback reduction of less
than 6 inches.
The existing second story balcony at its current conditions encroaches the minimum
required setback of 25.00 feet and the side setbock of 10.00feet. The replacement of the
balcony is impractical without the deviation from the front setback requirement
3. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not
materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
a. The redevelopment of the property is an effort to maintain and increase the value of the
subject property and it will positively contributes to the value of the overall
neighborhood and abuKing properties.
The proposed building sq�are footage is 5,489.57 squore feet of covered. 7i�e closest
structure towards the south is approximate 6,203 square feet. The structure towards the
north is approximate 4,302 square feet.
The subject property is a Ranch architedural style; the proposed renovotion will be a Key
West style more in harmony with the adjacent properties. The proposed building colors
are white-cream with a brown color roof. The existing building color for the property to
the north is a white light color with a white roof.
Overall the subject project redevelopment 1 similar in character and size and its similarity
will not reduce the market value of the obutting properties.
4. The uses within the resider�tial inFill project are otherwise permitted in the district;
a. The existing residential structure is currently a one unit dweUing within LDR zoning district.
There ar2 no �hcr,�es proposeri ta t;;P suvject use and therefore aCheres ta uses perm;�ted
within D!R district.
5. The uses within the resider�tial infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses;
a. The proposed project consists of interior and exterior improvements to the existing
residential structure. Surraunding properties consists of one unit detached dwellings and
are the only use within the LDR zoning district of Mandalay Point subdivision. The
proposed residence renovation is perfectly compotible with the adjocent land uses as
single family detached dwelling within a low density residential district. The subject
property is fully compatible with adjacent land uses.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential in�ll project will
upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;:
a. ihe parcel is an existing single family detached dwelling. The renovation including the
upgrade includes remodeling of the existing structure for both interior and exterior
elements including the reconfiguration ofscreened porches areas (rear of the
buildinq) covered entry porch and covered verandait (at the front of tite building). The
new additions at the front of the building will have architectural features such as
columns. The balcony above the existing garage facing Mandalay Point is proposed to
be modified by increasing the area of approximate 20 SF and its architectural look will
enhanced by being covered and columns.
The overall renovation is in harmony and similarity with the surrounding properties and
will enhance the overall architedurat look by the addition of features such as the
col umns and new covered roof above the proposed additions. The overalf front building
architecturai look enhoncement wili upgrade the ciosest immediate property
7. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and tunction which
enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
a. The subject property mointains and further enhances the harmony of the surrounding
community by maintaining a similar low residentia� intensity to adjacent properties. The
proposed building square footage is 5,489.57 square feet of covered. Low lntensity
zoning allows for a maximum FAR of 0.40. The closest structure towards the south is
approximate 6,203 square feet, with an existing FAR of 0.31. The structure towards the
north is approximate 4,302 square feet with an FAR of 0.28. The subject property at the
proposed floor area ratio (FAR) is 0.30 below other surrounding properties by 3.3�6 and
above of 6.7%
The existing building height of the second story above the garage is 10'-7" ft. With the
proposed renovations the building height for the observation deck located on the
southwest corner of the building is maintained ot 13'-4" ft from the base}lood elevation.
The building to the north is a one story building with approximate height 9' above the
base ffood elevation. The ciosest building to the south is a two story with approximate
etevation of 13 feet above the base flood elevation.
The proposed setback to the north (side) is 7.58 feet for the second story balcony; the
proposed front setback for the proposed covered verandah is 11.53 feet. The structure
toward the north has a front setbock along Mandalay Point of approximate 8 feet, south
(side) setback of 9 feet and north (sideJ setback of 3 feet. The closest structure towards
the south has a front setback of approximate 10 feet south (side) setbock of
approximate 3 feet and north (sideJ setback of 22 feet. The subjed property proposed
setbacks are similar to the existing building setbacks of the adjacent properties.
The proposed redevelopment by interior renovation and exterior structures addition will
positively increase the residence vatue. The renovation will be consistent with the
existing abutting residence s and with the overall community charader of Mandalay
Point Subdivision and the City of Clearwater as whole.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking access or other
development standards are justified by the be�efits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole;
a. The proposed flexibility in regard to the front and side setback for the proposed additions
are justified because the existing front and side setbacks are already encroaching the
required minimum setbacks. Ti�e proposed balcony is replacing an existing baicony at the
same location with a net increase of the side setback less than one inch and the front
setback of approximate 0.5 feet . The proposed setback for verandah/porch addition at
the front of the building does not exceed the existing front building setback. The overnll
buitding renovation will increase the property vatue and positively contributing to the
neighborhood value.
. � � * _ � . �' f. � �A . . r' ..�
� ��':, : �;,'�;+�. �.� " �
.
r
., .
��,� c�„�" ' s ° � � 4� � • ,??� � i . ?!ir F
.�"` .: . �y.� ,,G '� � i ►� � .
.
.
;, � .-.
, ,..;
c
�� �,`� �,y� � �s�. �� � ' f � 5 � -
€ R e, iR
,..� � � �r . . ir& � ` _
�n���p tl ` �
r�
a y� �! 'i�7L- F t } �
��� ' �� ��� � � �i
� �. �
�
. :m �
.
� � e "� ��� � �
,� �,.�.• �
� ,, �, . . -, �. � � �
�;�,�',z ������ . � _ �
�. , � .,� � � �
`� `�*� `� � ' �r �-' � �
� i .�� � k�"'� � �'�' �� :� -� �
� �''�`�' ++ .,�n`� � s , r: _ � ! � '�'� .. ` � - a i
.
y, '�'g� � +w. '�„`�� ��... � a �` Fi
,� . � * �� . _. �t' i
'�r16�„»._ �4 _. .'� 'l�NI �,�
+ ,�
I
U�
�
.
�1k i� +�: ' �P;
',� '
, �
. �Y � ' � ..�
..
,I�+� �, �
�$ r � -
�,.
.
� ,
.
y.., ?_c -
�` � �T ''-';� �'� � _.,, # -• t �,�
'�' ,,, `� „�, +
�
�
ar� � —
x F '� �.�� �" �, � � � � i�+�
' s � � ��, � - `�,, � �
-� ' f' �� �' '�`'�. EXISTING BUILDING = �'M'�� ` ��
� � �" �•,�=�: � �` � RESIDENCE #1150 w � � � �
��� ` � ��"�° t 4,302 SF (EXISTING) ,�' �2'4�
�` .. � ,-� �
�
, , , . ,.
f r i � 'y �
.+�� ,�,.`�r �� � � ��. ��.. . ���,'+ � �
� _ • • -' • � � ,. �r.
` � �
� �`•f � ..,ns '�� 4�� �
a°� �` , � :k•� `
�F a � !�
4� ^ + �'� '��� s � �'� ic � 'y,
,. t .x.; �� . �' ' ,. a „v''LL�� �'� , ��� .� '�; k�'^:. '"� �
e �; ` . �� �,.��'� ��"� � � n `` SUBJECT PROPERTY �
� �y
'� � T
'«q �� � � ^ ti � L� �;
4 �;:: Y � � k p�, M f��. �4�" ' . � � .. . � ;�' , y �i �
� P . ai f.. � ��"'g a* ^� � �R� � �
,i^„� � ��•r ` '"�`..+�' ,�,�w - .. � � �i,� �..� ��}� �"' ..
w �� �� � � � . � . . , .. � �. �' "r' �
� ,. . ^� � �^ A '� . �''�� � � �
p - � ��.�+���.rF, .9, t�
I�' k �c y"�, � � � '� � r
,{�t"� � '� �; � �ia. } � e � `.� � � -q�� �� �i
� � '�' ° �a' � �x ' �# ��f , . � "!le
_ ��.t� � '�,� . �a, .�;.., ..•R a�
yF' '�� °; 0 �R'M��� ,y� �`� � Y�� ' ,. �� I F .b
�� � . *� ' _{V � 'iv�1 '4 ! T � ..�#, � � �� i
�� Y �.' � � ��::� �yF�,°~b �� 'R•�� �r�� '�S e•1 . �£?
�T . ��.. � �I . t «� e
� ' . ,.:1�.��.�� • � � . � °, a .� � �N . e
� • �R . M p� r �
� � �' `�F ° � ,,� . =� �
. � � § -.
* � a�y ,'*M 4 � � ' � ' �� .
. 8 � � � �� ... � N .
• �
� ry r
..
� >Nkbt.� � i ,
. . ' � , • � , .. �
�.; , .ti,��� �.: �� �
� °� ��. �' — ` � ,�� '�ti � ��; t 1
� � ; .
. �
�� �" � :- � F�• � u � �
,�„ � ` z,
� _ ti .
w�
'� �� �' � �` ° �. ,.
� `��y" �• . +� � � v ' '� c � EXISTING BUILDING
� � 4 �� ��� x ,� X'�, : �" ' � RESIDENCE #1114 .�i=
� ;s , � , �," � :,J, ± 6,203 SF (EXISTING)
,� ��, � �` ' �` �.,.:� � � .��� �"` � ;.
�.. . _ �, � ': _ .
+�,� �' � :;�. ,� '�` +� � � +'.� �
�R'p' ,a. m..4-• � �,� . �,''� .. !� � ,
,y� k:
� ��a. � �r . � '� � =s�..� i'K,kR'r � «•i � ,�' '� � .� +�1�' �. .i
� � � .> �� �r'. , ��.� � _��— �" � �'' :Ii �+ � '
' � .�. , �
. � �� � � � � � r,
a � ,� �`.� � �'���"�"' �� €� `r' ' .�,.�� � � � � �
�` �° � �, . � '�.,: -+ rr- r - - .�1
— --- �� -�
i. ,.. �_ �
i �;����� �„ �� . ,
� � ; ,� , „ ��� �
9� ��
t�' ,��' � �' � �i G��t t���� ��� 1�� �r i6t��(� � ; �
��i I mi���q� i �� ` � �
i��� �6 , � _.�
.,� ��� ;
� u .t
. ,�
,
:
-� � �, , ; . ,.
` � �, �' .. ti `�`�s
'�; , o � �
_��� ,� �t
.�.�� �' � ."'` '
� .�,:
� �,, � .
r: � �v ,. �� `"���
.� f '�:;�: ���.� ���-�'*�
� � y<
` � 't' ~ � _tR :
,,
� �: . r�. :�:"�►, �• . �
. ,, : ,
� �` � -C *:.y��i F � �i� � h ~'` ��' } "� y� �n��
� , ji ,� / r .
.��� � �. ``,# �, x��,. � " . �J ��, � ��'
� x , /1 �' ' 'X�j
} � �� ' � rt�' F i . _ .
�\. ��,� ��} +i� ) .K,` t� t � " i:. rr/"illi , � .
, •
� � . � . "p� ' �.
�� . � .�
� � v
i � P.. �
'` .� 4 ��`x.. ' ' .j' , . �'.� �.. � i .'..... E�
. ,
� �, � , . .. . . . _
� /
n..
y. �: � . ., . : t ; . �3 .
., �
«
� �'p �� f � ' � r �'S,� si 1 �� �� . .
x.'� �� � � � v. , p � � � 1 7 r' " ' � ^i„�'� : _`-,,,,,,y�.
�. y
� �r _.� . 4. � n
• +a y � ,i'� f€ � t 'I
�yr. +0.�, 3 � .
��
. .
1 �� F "
t ^�' �
. . : �;
s - ��`�'�S;�l^���� tR' r� �'�p�r�3� , �
.
�
_ , , �; , ..
P :
,
��e� ; � ►� !-�, �„�+{! "���.���_��y �.. t : ,�Y �* ! �� � `1 ��w,:i> { �t -�.
y '� ':ll �..��� �' ,� � � t� "� t �. _ l� /dyi. ;,- i `�
tr_*�. ' : p
.�� �!(. � i 7�` _ ��' "3� '.� �" �// Y �t� ,y^ ��N V
. _� � ` t ` .' � � - ` t ��� f 4 ' ' °�,." �" i � ,.
R �;`� a � ,�'� ..,� . �y1
� .� tj �,� � � r'� .�,. .� 1; a, .�:.� ' .1 � �'+ �;} �,� { ' r� �'��:
, '` i � s,.. r� � *�c���{. . � � � � ,. ) � �� `�.0 ' � �� .. T' �
� �. � t ���� � � � `;,^w t t� y f- � .��e �� '� ,
. � � � �i ,�,y* a Y s ' ;'t �� � �.t�. "� � � t
�
�� �_ �i � .� �- ,�( �..� � .�t �` t `4`
, . . �rv� Ift� �� . ,'����+lA��� ���� _yt.�»R
. *�.� � ,;� ♦ �� �\J✓ �.. 'f�1..�� ".4 . w _�
_ . ; ���ry' �� � ., i * � • `��'/;�l�� t���+`g� xi ���% `
ri •
, - � ° ' „1r' v„ ' _ . _ i�„'�rM ° �fi� �„�. Y ,��� �, ,�'� .�'��
�
,: .. . �� . , �_ k ��_ � � , j_ � �s r i .`�t
1
a-.' - � , .�, ,. , ` � y, ' �
...w„a t ... " ..%+. � . . }� c. , ;,„ ; , � � `r� � ...�j� �",'� ;r xs�
��` �
# t R
, �. . � � � .�.�.,.m`.,�� '"�t �� �.�i ��i'• i ��h�"• . 1'��i �'' '
,m�. � ... � .. i . . i s, . .. �j i��'� � �' 9. `�� � `�� i. " t.
•�d�.���' a s:� '` i w.,,�-.r..„� rn.�e� a+. .'y. �, +!,� �r C ~ Y�� � ��� ..'z� �. ��� �: � i�r ^c,,
.
i h
.
� , . . � � ,. . '��i i au!`g ti',y ti .� �
,
,
�,� �x a;.' ' .. � .. '� ' � :,� �� i �: :xr*i . �_e•� . .. �
.
� ,.: ,, . ... . , , . .� .
.�
; �*
. . , ,.. .� . .
w, .
4 .�' R .
i. �I`�� ' i� 4 •�.
. T.' rK A% '� � � �yZ�`" q,`
�i. �
.: p#`� � � ytr�.V �'' � S�
«
�,�.�^�""k`� .� ,� , d .. gt�,'y�
�
r'
� � . , *:i+�". . .
_ �...
r
�?s
� x �".w,� r..�
�fw
W
� '.
�
� ���_ -:.��.
:
t, �
. s �. �
�;��
. t� _. .
. s�„ °� . «- ..�
�� �
�� �� .
��
�
�.
��-
�'x
�:
� -
kir
�;
�:�E,
�. � � �
j' l 1
, ;
� 4:i
� :� �
C _ , �'°''__,—�—`
.� a �
:.
� � t, � . ��
�i �
� ='"°„a
i ,�� � � � ' i��
� I
� � �� � � �
�
� `�'�� `E� �� � ` ��`
��`�,' �
.' :. . . .. . . . .
���, ; �r."'�' .� �m �
,'�. f,
�: , , . �a
��-; 1 t Y
',q_ sy E � c ± +, r° '}
.dib}�,t� .� {t,.
�i Ua��fl �4 � ;,;�.,��'.p..
� , '� `� � � �.�,
w_h . +ty�+ �...4 .
�as
,i � i '`' �„ +�-
.� y ` �,. '� �3.��' "
. 4 1 +�i
.� ��� �,s�'� �✓��.� � .j.'�a
�' ;�� �°�� ���i.�.;� fi ..'' ,} �,e
. �.... . A i�l,.
+q�,L�M�,�YLf} t,S�t� { .�,, i����� '�/e��}
�' l 7� �l'S a i.�1� 1, 4'� � r' �'`� r�
A.Ei � �� �•4��1'"�. .� "�ha.'�'+/S P t' �5 m 1�.' )frM.'. Ji,,.�+1� +...I
\ 1
S
W� � � ;�.n,Y,� (4' '" .`��,y „a
" �" t',�`i.T �I�� (�i yefl,. g.t"'t��,�l .^4i��� ���:.?� �. �
j`�. S�� ,'(� 1 R�^�' ` 4Rtii�� �1`a'�{. 3 g '��,�' R
f ; .j. �. v "� �. � '`� �1f ` � � ���
� ti¢� y� ��. �.�y r• ,� ��y ��i.T.%��''�_ # a .' �..
2� � �' .i
!i' . t '�" r �.°. �
� l -,� '�'"i"3'�$ c�-�� �� R� ��,.�,�rZ.' .''t1 k��ti t a��""S",,
� �
ir �.*
.�@ . �r *4� x t ❑ � ��� �,� �4y � �;."^,�`'i�4
' � T -t t � �'.- t Pt 'i Zt. . a 84^' l'' ' ,..+. t'A[�,� ' � ,
V +� !� , � �... t t�.� *, : � � �I,
� -C1� �-� �"` �y� J''C . � 7� � T w �.
'�, fy� '' t �
� � . � � � W � � � 1 y�'Y� ��
'\ �} �.$a � �.;�".� � �'c�� �}9i���� �� �� . _j '' ,,�f . . �.;
t: ��
i : � ♦ i f t �` 6 +�` 7 -. `hJ 6� � v .. � \�;
Z ", }��.� �`�W�M� r. �ar �.^�f iiy�� :"�41y�'x��� }'y �+�.x�`�`�}-'�,:w I
� �..i ��£� �L `4\-,� . �
`; ` ` '�,�t s- y'�t"t� ""�R.: a�4,,4 t �'�= r` �
�a ' ����y�c, q yi � t �� '� } r !�'S '�' ��� � �'±, '�` ` � :i
,. �.;G :i� �'���� 4,t'`t"i �.,1 ��`�. ,�'�,�` ` `� ,�.t �'s�
.�'z ..�`� �7.� � 4 }i.. 7i, � .,�.e*„t(�rY 5�w,l�?' '..�r
S '> `ti ;. `� � �i.� 1 i'� 2 'k" ,k'�, �y � a� �..
�,"` �-. ,t� `� v^ � 'h`6. � '�+w`)y s Tt
�4 � f 'q�♦ .\S`��t'���� ?l�'}�' * .A. �Z�+ �� �;
y{w�E � 'F.�a�i.; �+ .:�., a�.�,t,tj,.�4x�:':'�Y+4}��� �•�,
4 '� 'z,K fr1� � �"�, ,1,,,�"i 4f;"t. � • y�, ^Y i. '"d�-� �^i� �� i� `t'�i �.:;
"� �.: � 1�} � i �� �����:��4�� . . 'f
� :t �_:." 6'{^``'7 �K,.`-: {,�ty4r+ly2�. �-�`"4'N, 4A �;,- 1
u �
w #`k ��.� ` t.-T �� �R i� Rw"� ti,���
,,� ,�
�4
:4�
k � t . .,.� �!.' t^�`' �� ��f' ny„`,;s;t'� �j .�" � '...6:�,
. �`� � . �� ����, ' � „,�' � ,�� �� ''�`
, �
8 r *�`
b � � �. �i. ��, �F QC. "'�+q,_.i'.. �7 46'3Lti.�Y �� : ^�y� �Y= �•
l:','� Y � E ! y; £ w Y j1�',�y s�'*�-iw �+ "� .i �q�, �t,,,k,. .
., �, -�, � - t�y�.- ,� y,t �, �, '�d �'�- �. x's"'t t'"�-� �
1 , �t t ,., t� :,'�k+ '�f n..,�zh ,"'.,�'�t..�, r��1 �Y""4`� `�' �-^
i l'�.i ��� T� �,1,(Lk'�.� k �GS; i
' � ��. �` t ��r '��tl'4} � !}�t � � �'���iA��
' •�' �1 �{'� ,i;,,� + r *�� i w " � �`q} 1�"- �� 4 �'1� t
'1� tr,v �` ��-., �' ,,,,i. ��� .r.."+ �� � r�
r ,+. i; � �', �r+r 'y't `Yi ' 4,. ..t 'R'*ti�.��r 1 ,.�"4�s
r,�t£ ._���5 : t r `+�, . � +,'.a '�,fi.2 �
� � �,, ' � 4.�'' i t.�y,+ �L °�,*..`>�y�z.�''
� hv;'�_ � yi`�•�� 4�� Yl Il:ecs ��'ati�� 2\� �
:, , , : f i� ,TYv f l { htt •�t \ �r
'� `"�i �'�� N..R .�,pk�'Sr�:��i 1���.*���`..i�
, � ' ,`�. � }.> � .,� �, � . �s,�, \'9�
T y� lr*��� .: � �,}'Z��� � `'�e
X�, 4, r��'� ,� � aa+�, a�irl��l';'1�t.,` ,.} v�,�s� �
1 A s A n . t�� -' 'P i:�
'' � �� �"S�. � ��1ec 1 S �`' � � 7,
i `di„�� �+ Z . �i �. i' �az � � ��
�5 � � , .� , �� �i'' �"i
a '� � ��� �' � C` '��'k. ��� " '; � '�' ^�; �
;� �° � �p � i � '�,�tit'", '' �t� �,,�,, �',g�'*1
t 3�i^�,`.. .�. ` `sti, �•,..
� r '< �1 � �, �* �p ° + °
� � 4 �., � a �� t1; tfi ,� .r,� `;,,�.
. '.� Y,]'}, ���*��,� 4 �'.. , �� � � �-0.
� y, � " �.�i..��`" ::i.� � �*�,u*+ ,�
� � � + � `�•�+�"`a,''t� s '# �
• +�'.�
� � - � l��Y.,`�, ;•� � .' �l g'�.k���� �
ti:,. �., 1 , . �� �1�':. ,
r � � '
, . � �`.°�
�fi,� k °.�� .
�
•�- , �, x
�°�' ��.�..� �_ _. � . ,
� � � z� Y
n �,
���' +
°��� r: ����'�:.
�` ��
.�� � �
� � � �� �
�
�, . ., �
d¢� ��: �ry��..�
;�' L���� �A t T�Ar.
�. � * ��� �. I
j�. �P'�` .�,
��� 4 . , ��}3
Iu�"��� �� �
� �� � ��
€ �
�.�Y'�����
.'� � a� �� ��.�
�