The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2013-02006 � , 31622 US 1S North �� PaEm Harbor�Florida 34684 � � Phon�:t727)785t--s010 � . � Tail FFaxt(72fi)w7'8T-A39�4 �� L�tndon, More� & Asst�ci��— ' wti�rw:�.�a��.con� ��Y�� n��an��+�� E- - BAY EgpLANADE �USTNN�LMIIEN+GR.CQ� g50 FLg2013-02006 � Atlas#:258A Ap�il 10, 2013 DeNunzTo°st Zoning: City of Clearwater Nlanning & Development Dept. 100 South Myrtle Avenue, 2"d floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Attn: Kevin Nurnberger Re: FLS2013-02006 —650 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Nurnberger: Please find enclosed the following items per City of Clearwater requirements: • Development Agreement Application & associated documents • Flexible Standard Development Application & associated documents • Comprehensive Landscaping Application • Civil Engineering Construction Plans • Architectural Plans & Elevations • Landscape & Irrigation Plans, Tree Inventory • Drainage Calculations • Traffic Study • Property Survey Please find below our responses to City comments dated March 1, 2013: FLS2013-02006 Parks & Recreation 1. Acknowledged. The Developer will comply with the Public Art fee prior to issuance of C.O. Enaineerinq F:\Projects�651-01 Denunzio Hotel\City of Clearwater�2013-04-10 Revised Submitta1�2013-04-10 FLS Response Letter.doc 1. No adjacent sidewalks exist. Proposed sidewalks to be constructed in accordance with City Construction Standard Index 109 and ADA Standards per FDOT Index #304. Detectable warnings have been removed from the plans. 2. Please see sheet IR1. Proposed irrigation is connecting to the existing reclaimed water meter as requested. 3. Acknowledged. Certificate of Occupancy 1. Acknowledged. General Note 1. Acknowledged. 2. Acknowledged. Environmental 1. Acknowledged. 2. Vault specifications and maintenance agreement to be provided prior to issuance of building permit. See Sheet 4 of the Engineering plans for maintenance notes. Fire 1. Fire flow calculations have been ordered. Results and water study to be provided prior to issuance of building permit. 2. Acknowledged. Standpipe locations to be provided during permitting process. 3. See revised Sheet 4 of the Engineering plans for FDC location. 4. See revised Sheet 4 of the Engineering plans for FDC location and "No Parking Fire Department Connection" sign. 5. Acknowledged. 6. Acknowledged. 7. At time of construction (completion of floors and outer walls) the structure will be tested and must meet the minimum requirement of Negative 95 BDM. If this requirement is met, the radio system will not be required. If we do not meet the requirement an RF engineer will be consulted and the required radio system installed. 8. No gate is proposed, main entrances to be open and will not require a knox box. 9. The height of the highest occupiable level will be 58'-2" from grade. 10.Acknowledged. Land Resource 1. Please see revised tree inventory prepared by Rick Albee. 2. Tree in question has been shown for removal as suggested. Please see revised Sheet 2 of the Engineering plans. 3. Tree in question has been shown for removal as suggested. Please see revised Sheet 2 of the Engineering plans. 4. Acknowledged. Parks & Recreation 1. The previous use of the property was a 23 unit overnight accommodations development. Please see the revised site data table. Planninq 1. Proposed hotel has been modified. See attached Exhibit B for revised statements. 2. Proposed hotel has been modified. See attached Exhibit B for revised statements. 3. Acknowledged. 4. The project would generate only 833 daily trips, of which 62 would occur during peak hours. The report confirms acceptable levels of service will be maintained at the critical intersections and on Mandalay Avenue. 5. Acknowledged. 6. See Sheet 3 of the Engineering plans for solid waste note. Hours of operation for the tiki bar will be 10am-10pm and will not include live music. Compliance with Flexibility Criteria 1. Acknowledged. 2. Acknowledged. 3. Acknowledged. 4. The proposed patio has been removed from the plans. A mechanical room has been added to store mechanical equipment. Please see revised Architectural plans. 5. Request was a typo, no side setback reduction is being requested. 6. Acknowledged. 7. Acknowledged. 8. Acknowledged. See attached Development Agreement. 9. Acknowledged. 10.Indoor eating area is for guests only. The accessory uses are as follows: 600 sf fitness center, 2,600 sf ineeting area and 1,450 sf eating area. These uses total 7.2% of the GFA. Beach by Design 1. Proposed hotel has been modified. See attached Exhibit B for revised statements. 2. The proposed patio has been removed from the plans. A mechanical room has been added to store mechanical equipment. Please see revised Architectural plans. Request was a typo, no side setback reduction is being requested. 3-9. Proposed hotel has been modified. See attached Exhibit B for revised statements. 10.The Landscape Plan, Sheet LA1, will be revised to include some Phoenix palms (Indian Date Palms) along Bay Esplanade, in lieu of the Washingtonia and Queen Palms that were originally proposed. The Landscape Plan will also be revised to include groundcovers in the areas that were originally proposed to be sodded within the project boundary. 11.Acknowledged. C.3. Proposed hotel has been modified. See attached Exhibit B for revised statements. E.1.c. Proposed hotel has been modified. See attached Exhibit B for revised statements. E.3. Proposed hotel has been modified. See attached Exhibit B for revised statements. L.1. Proposed hotel has been modified. See attached Exhibit B for revised statements. L.1. Proposed hotel has been modified. See attached Exhibit B for revised statements. L.1. Proposed hotel has been modified. See attached Exhibit B for revised statements. L.2. The sidewalks have been revised to a paver sidewalk per Beach by Design standards. Please see revised Sheet 3 of the Engineering plans. General Site 1. See revised Sheet 3 of the Engineering plans for the requested sight visibility triangles. 2. See revised Architectural plans for height dimension at the entrances of the parking garage. 3. See revised Sheet 4 of the Engineering plans for the proposed ramp slopes. 4. Per discussions at previous BPRC & DRC meetings, ramp aisle widths may be narrower than 24 ft. provided that no parking is provided along said drive aisle. 5. Acknowledged. See note regarding existing utilities on revised Sheet 2 of the Engineering plans. 6. Wheelstops have been removed from the plans as requested. 7. Acknowledged. 8. The pool depth will not interfere with parking below. Draft Conditions of Approval 1-10. Acknowledged. Beach by Design 1-4. Proposed hotel has been modified. See attached Exhibit B for revised statements. Solid Waste 1. Acknowledged. See note on revised Sheet 3 of the Engineering plans. Stormwater 1. The entirety of the parking garage is closed and therefore will not produce any stormwater discharge to the right-of-way. All building runoff will come from the roof and is routed directly to the stormwater vault. For this project, the grading of the parking garage does not serve as a means to convey stormwater. The purpose of grading the parking garage is to transition from the building finished floor down to the existing road grade. 2. The water drainage system is designed to be concealed and will not be apparent from the exterior of the building. All decks and roof drains will tie into the stormwater vault system within the perimeter of the garage. General Note 1. Acknowledged. Traffic 1-5. Acknowledged. 6. Wheelstops have been removed from the site plan as requested. 7. No barrier gate is proposed at either entrance. 8. No parking is located on any drive aisle exceeding 5% slope. See revised Sheet 4 of the Engineering plans. 9. Acknowledged. 10.Acknowledged. Dead end parking on the third floor of the parking garage has adequate room for back-out maneuvering at the end of the aisle. Please see proposed turning templates on Sheet 6 of the Engineering plans. 11.Please see Sheet 3 of the Engineering plans for the requested sight visibility triangles. General Note 1. Acknowledged. 2. Acknowledged. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions ar camrnents regarding the praject or responses. Sincerely, LANDO(�, MOREE & ASSOCIATES, INC. w�.� . �� -,-.� �. Randy Austin Project Manager . � Q Planning&Development Department � � �arwater Flexible Standard Develo ment A lication P PP � Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING,DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY,AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON(NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS(1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES)AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED,STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $475 PROPERTY OWNER(PER DEED): Bay Esplanade Project, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 305 Cambridge Street, Suite 3, Cambridge, MA 02141 PHONE NUMBER: (617)945-2555 EMAI�: DJD@TheDeNunzioGroup.com AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Landon, Moree&Associates, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 31622 US 19 North, Palm Harbor, FL 34684 PHONE NUMBER: (727)789-5010 EMAIL: AUSTIN@LMAENGR.COM ADDRE55 OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 650 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767 PARCEL NUMBER(S): 15/29/15/54756/082/0010, 15/29/15/54756/082/0020, 15/29/15/54756/082/0110, 15/29/15/54756/082/0120 and 15/29/15/54756/082/0130 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached Exhibit A PROPOSED USE(S): Hotel (overnight accommodations) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See attached Exhibit B Specifically identify the request (include all requested code flexibility; e.g., reduction in required number of porking spaces, height, setbacks, lot size,lot width,specific use,etc.): Planning 8 Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562�567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01H2 , � o (`� � � Planning&Development Department � �.+ �� a�� Flexible Standard Develo ment A lication P PP � Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: Tourist District, Old Florida(Beach by Design) FUTURE LAND USE PIAN DESIGNATION: RFH, Resort Facilities High EXISTING USE(currently existing on site): VaCant land PROPOSED USE(new use,if any;plus existing,if to remain): Hotel (overnight accommodations) SITE AREA: 41,232 sq.ft. 0•95 acres GROSS FLOOR AREA(total square footage of all buildings): Existing: 0 sq.ft. Proposed: 64,125 sq.ft. Maximum Allowable: N/A sq.ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA(total square footage devoted to each use,if there will be multiple uses): First use: 59,500 sq.ft. Second use: 600 sq.ft. Third use: 2,600 sq.ft. Fourth use: 1,450 sq.ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO(total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: 0.0 Proposed: 1.56 Maximum Allowable: N/A BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT(1�`floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: 0 sq.ft. (0•0 %of site) Proposed: 6,422 sq.ft. ( 15.6 %of site) Maximum Permitted: 29,332 sq.ft. (71.1 %of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA(green space within the parking lot and interior of site;not perimeter buffer): Existing: 0 sq.ft. (0•� %of site) Proposed: 0 sq.ft. (0.0 %of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA(parking spaces,drive aisles,loading area): Existing: 0 sq.ft. (0.0 %of site) Proposed: 53,320 sq.ft. (129.3 %of site) Planning 8 Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562�865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 01N2 IMrERV10US Sl1RF110E RAT10{t�otal squarc foota�e of impervious arcas divided by cAe total square foot�e of dntire site�: E�atsetn� 0.0 rroposed: 0.� Ma�amum Permitted: 0.95 OENSlTY(uf►its,rooms or beds pe�atre): BUILDING NE16HT: Extsti�; 0 Exiuir�g: 0 proposed; 102{107/ac) �roposed: 65'above BFE Maximum Pcrmitted: 48(SQrac) Maxtmum Penriitted: 35' OFF-STR�T PNtKING: �� Note:A parlriny demand study rnusi be pnarided M rnr�jur�ction w�Th ony rcquest pro�ed: 129 M rcduce the amor�M af ►+e'Qc+i�rd o�-sUret pwk� spares. Pkase see the Minimum Requi�ed: t 23 odopted Pnrkirp Onv+ond Studf�G+j+�'h�f++�� MIHAT IS THE FSTIMATEO TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON OOM�LETION? $8,�•�,� ZONING�T�CI'S FQR wLL ADIACENT PROPERTY: Nonh: Tourist South: Tou� East: Tou�at west: Tou�ist STATE QF FIORIDA,COUNTY Of PINELIAt i. the unde�ned, acknawicd�e chat all Awarn to and submibed before me Mis �� day of representabio�s made in this application xe true and �,�2,�„ ��1 � ,ro me a�d/o�by accu�e to the 6e�of m�r lawwled�e and authorize Qty oeprese� to visit and photograph the J�---y �a�' �'`�-�J a�1 ..,_.; .who�rson cwnhas property desaibed Irt ttis a�plication, p�oduced as identificallon. Sisnaturc of property owncr or�taHve Notary puWit, My commission expirc� . Noqtr • 1�C�n.lxl�i�s�NN 1�.t�1� ,��EE 1N�ti MM1 TkM�ll M1�MN1 MMII� �Y��t 10�s.M�I►d�Aw�ClaNratK,F�337�i,Tii:7t7d�Z�!N7;Fa�717di2�ti6 ��.s or e �ewa.a ein s � � � Planning&Development Department � C ear�vate Flexible Standard Develo ment A lication P PP `� Site Plan Submittal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT (FLS) APPLICATION, ALL FLS APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: ❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Standard Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Standard Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor inciuding the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including ofFicial records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S.§723.083,the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. ❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift,catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other si milar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. ❑ A site plan prepared by a professional architect,engineer,certified planner or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: ❑ Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. ❑ North arrow,scale,location map and date prepared. ❑ Identification of the boundaries of phases,if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. ❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area,and the Base Flood Elevation(BFE)of the property,as applicable. ❑ Location,footprint,size and height of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. ❑ Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site,with proposed points of access. ❑ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks,curbs,gutters,water lines,sanitary sewer lines,storm drains, manholes, inlets,lift stations,fire hydrants,underground conduits,seawalls and any proposed utility easements. ❑ Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities, including offsite elevations, as may be required by the Engineering Department to evaluate proposed stormwater management, as well as a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. ❑ Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection. ❑ Location of off-street loading area,if required by Section 3-1406. ❑ Location,type and lamp height of all outdoor lighting fixtures. ❑ Location of all existing and proposed attached and freestanding signage. ❑ All adjacent right(s)-of-way,with indication of centerline and width,paved width,existing median cuts and intersections, street light poles,bus shelters,signage and utility company facilities. Planning 8 Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01112 ❑ Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. ❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height,building materials,and concealment of all mechanical equipment located on the roof. ❑ Typical floor plans,including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. ❑ Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. ❑ If there is any requested deviation to the parking standards a parking demand study will need to be provided. Prior to the preparation of such study,the methodology shall be approved by the Planning and Engineering Departments.The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. ❑ Tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees;as well as a tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more,and identifying those trees proposed to be removed,if any. ❑ A traffic impact study shall be required for any development which may degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. ❑ An application for a certificate of concurrency/capacity or a nonconcurrency affidavit. No development approval shall be granted until a certificate of concurrency/capacity is issued or a nonconcurrency affidavit is executed. ❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use;or an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information,if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval: ❑ Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. ❑ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site,by species,size and location,including drip line. 0 Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs, and ground cover plants, including planting instructions, soil mixes, backfilling,mulching,staking and protective measures. ❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. ❑ Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, sign locations, curbs, gutters, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, manholes, inlets, lift stations, fire hydrants, underground conduits, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landscape. ❑ Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. ❑ Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations, and drainage structures and other drainage improvements. ❑ All adjacent right(s)-of-way,with indication of centerline and width, paved width,existing median cuts and intersections, street light poles,bus shelters,signage and utility company facilities. ❑ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles,if any. ❑ An irrigation plan. Planning 8 Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 01N2 o � � Planning&Development Department � � �t��t�te Flexible Standard Develo ment A lication P PP U General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX(6)GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW,IN DETAII,THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverege, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See attached Exhibit B 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See attached Exhibit B 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See attached Exhibit B 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See attached Exhibit B 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See attached Exhibit B 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,on adjacent properties. See attached Exhibit B Planning 8 Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 07/12 a Planning&Development Department � � ear�vater Flexible Standard Develo ment A lication P pP u Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S)BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(5)IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW,IN DETAIL,EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL(USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). 1 See attached Exhibit B 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Planning 8 Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised Oi112 , , , . o �� Planning&Development Department � � ar�vate Flexible Standard Develo ment A lication P PP U Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed—PRINT full names: Bay Esplanade Project, LLC 2. That(I am/we are)the owner(s)and record title holder(s)of the following described property: 650 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for(describe request): See attached Exhibit B 4. That the undersigned(has/have)appointed and(does/do)appoint: Landon, Moree&Associates, Inc. as(his/their)agent(s)to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That(I/we),the undersigned authority,hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. See previously submitted Letter of Authorization Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED,AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA,ON THIS DAY OF , , PERSONALLY APPEARED WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. Notary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: Planning 8 Development Deparhnent,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562�567;Fax:727-562�865 Page 8 of 8 Revised 01N2 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 82, UNIT N0. 5, MANDALAY REPLAT, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20. PAGE 27, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY. FLORIOA. PARCEL 2 LOT 2, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT #5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNN, FLORIDA, LOT 2, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 82, OF UNIT 5, MANDALAY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, PINELLAS COUNTY RECORDS, RUN SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF CHEROKEE AVENUE, 248 FEET FOR POB, THENCE RUN N68'04'43"E, 121 FEET; THENCE RUN S01'37'47"E, 70 FEET; THENCE RUN S88'06'02"W, 123 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF CHEROKEE AVENUE; THENCE RUN NORTH 70 FEET TO POB. (CHEROKEE AVENUE IS NOW KNOWN AS POINSETTIA AVENUE) PARCEL 3 LOT 11, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT N0. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 4 LOT 12, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT N0. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINEILAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 5 LOT 13, BLOCK 82, MANDALAY UNIT N0. 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27, AND PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Exhibit"B" Bay Esplanade ProjeGt, LLC Overnight Accommodations Application 650 Bay Esplanade The Applicant is requesting Flexible Development Approval for the development of a 102 room hotel on north Clearwater Beach, located in the Old Florida District as identified by Beach by Design ("Hotel"), as shown on the site plan included as part of this application. The hotel is located generally on .95 acres at 650 Bay Esplanade and fronts both Poinsettia Ave and Bay Esplanade. It is surrounded by multifamily and transient accommodation uses. Concurrent with this application, the Applicant has submitted a request for the approval of a Development Agreement for the grant of fifty- five (55) overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve. The Old Florida District is an area of transition between the higher intensity uses in the East Shore District and the North Clearwater Beach residential neighborhood. The location of the proposed Hotel is situated in the center of this district and is scaled in such a way to provide a transition from the larger hotels to the south and the single family homes to the north. In addition to the Hotel, an application for a three-unit resort attached dwelling development is being submitted across the street which results in the infill of two centrally-located properties within the Old Florida District and enhances the Districts identify as a mixed use District. Beach by Design "supports the development of new overnight accommodations and attached dwellings throughout the District." Specially, the applicant requests approval of an overnight accommodations project, consistent with the Code Section 2-803(J) with: 1. 102 overnight accommodation units; 2. 129 parking spaces when at least 123 is required by Code; 3. A height of 65 feet from Base Flood Elevation; 4. Setbacks of a. 10' feet and 15' on the north side when 10' is permitted by Code b. 21' feet on the east side when 15' is permitted by Code c. 15' feet and 21' on the south side when 15' is permitted by Code d. 15' feet on the west side when 15' is permitted by Code 5. Lot area of 41,232 sq. ft. for a total of .95 acres m.o.l. General Applicability Criteria 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. • The very goal of the design of this development is to address the Character of this area. This area is in a state of flux with redevelopment pressures coming to bear on the area. We sought to create a project that exemplifies the City's planning and zoning goals, and demonstrates the design and planning intents of Beach by Design. Our belief is that this development will set the standard for quality development in the area. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. • The development of this property is in keeping with the City of Clearwater's goals for the Tourist District and the Old Florida District, as well as each district's planning criteria. This proposal will, in our opinion, set a positive design and development standard and encourage similar (re)development in the area. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. • By respecting the design criteria applicable within the District, this development makes every effort to protect the general Health, Safety, and Welfare of, first the neighborhood, and second of all persons utilizing the development and any and all employees of the development. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. • The entry and egress points from this development have been designed and placed so as to minimize impacts and to maximize the efficiency of the vehicular flow to and from the development. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. • This development, being a mid-priced, hotel is in character with the transient accommodatior / rental resort character of the area. Being in the Tourist and Old Florida Districts, this development strengthens the character and uses of the facilities within the area. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. • Because this project is in character with the area (The Old Florida District), the use proposed is compatible with adjacent properties and this project addresses the desired planning goals for the area, we have planned and, in our opinion, designed facilities that state of the art and will protect and preserve the visual, olfactory, and auditory environment of the area. The project is designed to comply with all applicable building codes and we are proposing a Comprehensive landscape Program that will, not only, shield and buffer the property, but also beautify the neighborhood. • We believe this development will set a very high environmental standard for the area. Written Flexibility criteria: 1. With the exception of those properties located on Clearwater Beach, the parcel proposed for development shall front on but shall not involve direct access to a major arterial street unless no other means of access would be possible; The Hotel is located on north Clearwater Beach and fronts on finro minor arterials, Poinsettia Avenue and Bay Esplanade. .the site is in effect a peninsula with the only access to the site from those two roads. 2. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design and appearance; The proposed maximum building height of 65', above Base Flood Elevation, is within the Development code allowances for the Tourist District and the Beach by Design Criteria in the "Old Florida District". 3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign program; The Applicant will submit a comprehensive sign program application prior to occupancy 4. Front setback: a. The reduced setback shall contribute to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduced setback shall result in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance; and c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. This proposed development maintains the required minimum front setbacks, of 15', on each of the three frontages and increases the setbacks on the West frontage and on the western half of the south frontage. On the west side we have increased the setback to 21', an increase of six feet, to allow a reduction in the step-back of 12 feet. Along the south elevation the 65 foot, main building setback is increased to 21 feet to allow the step back to be reduced by 12 feet. Additionally, in many areas along the building perimeter the building setback is greater than the minimum, creating a varied building fa�ade and allowing for more opportunities for landscaping. 5. Side and rear setbacks: a. The reduced setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles and/or personnel; b. The reduced setback results in an improved site plan through the provision of a more efficient off-street parking area, and/or improved building design and appearance; and c. The reduced setback will not result in a loss of landscaped area, as those areas being diminished by the setback reduction will be compensated for in other areas through a Comprehensive Landscape Plan. The proposed development maintains the minimum required 10 foot side / rear setback. 6. Off-street parking: a. The proposed development contains no more than 130 rooms; and b. The proposed development is within 1,000 feet of an existing public parking garage with documented available capacity. The development proposes 102 hotel rooms with 129 parking spaces in the on- site parking garage. The resulting parking ratio, of 1.25 cars per room, is above the minimum required 1.2 parking ratio. There is no public parking garage within 1000 feet but there are a number of public and private parking areas. 7. The design of all buildings shall comply with the Tourist District site and architectural design guidelines in_Section 3-501, as applicable. • This proposed development is a catalyst for future development and redevelopment within the Old Florida District. The Proposed Hotel will be located in the Old Florida character district, as designated by Beach by Design. This is District serves as a transition area from commercial to residential areas on Clearwater Beach. The design of the Hotel is consistent with this transition area because the proposed height is 65 feet, 10 feet less than the permitted height in this area of the Old Florida District. The Old Florida District encourages the establishment of tourist and residential uses. The design of the proposed Hotel respects the Beach by Design: Design Objectives in the following ways: • Bulk: The bulk of the building is broken down by stepping and color changes in the fa�ade and by maintaining the minimum 15 foot front yard setbacks. These measures allow for the required sidewalks and landscaping along the perimeter of the site. • Density: The 102 rooms proposed for this development are optimal for supporting the cost of the development while still allowing for the onsite parking and the overall building to fit within the parameters of the development code. • Height: The requested 65' height is within the "T" District and Beach by design standards. • Design, Scale, and Mass: To break the apparent mass of the building the design steps the footprint horizontally to follow the curvature of the site, steps the building, vertically, to create a discernible base, middle, and top to the building, and varies the window types and openings. The length of the building is also interrupted by building steps, balcony placement, color, height variations, and material changes. Beach by Design specifically encourages the increase in transient accommodations on Clearwater Beach. The materials and colors reflect the Florida Coastal Vernacular while also addressing the requirements of the prospective hotel brand. 8. Lot area and/or width:The reduction shall not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity; This proposal is not requesting a deviation from the required lot width or area. 9.The parcel proposed for development shall, if located within the Coastal Storm Area, have a hurricane evacuation plan requiring the use close when a hurricane watch is posted; and The Applicant will implement a hurricane evacuation plan consistent with the requirements of the brand/flag that is adopted upon development. Furthermore, the inclusion of a development agreement will require the hurricane evacuation plan to be implemented consistent with Beach by Design. 10.A development agreement must be approved by the city council pursuant to F.S. §§ 163.3221-163.3243 and Community Development Code Section 4-606 if the development proposal exceeds the base density and/or base F.A.R. established for the underlying Future Land Use designation. The development agreement shall: a. Comply with all applicable requirements of the "Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan" as they pertain to alternative density/intensity, and as amended from time to time; b. Be recorded with the clerk of the circuit court pursuant to F.S. § 163.3239, with a copy filed with the property appraiser's office, and a copy submitted to the PPC and CPA for receipt and filing within 14 days after recording; and c. Have its development limitations memorialized in a deed restriction, which shall be recorded in the Official Records of Pinellas County prior to the issuance of any building permit for the overnight accommodations use. Concurrent with this application, the Applicant has submitted a request for approval of a Development Agreement for the grant of fifty-five (55) units from the Hotel Density Reserve. 11. Accessory Uses: a. Accessory uses must be incidental, subordinate, and customarily accessory to overnight accommodations; b. The following shall apply to required parking for accessory uses: 1. Gross Floor Area of Accessory Uses 2. this Hotel has more than 50 rooms c. For projects that request additional rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve: i. Maximum number of units allowed by Base Density; ii. Maximum number of units that may be allocated from Reserve iii. Total number of units permitted on site; iv. Units per acre (total/land area) . , v. Total floor area of accessory uses exceeding 10 percent of Gross Floor Area in Hotel vi. net acreage vii. Net acreage (vi) x units/acre (iv) viii. net acreage (vi) by base density—max rooms (vii) d. Signage for accessory uses e. Destination Resort Density Pool This Hotel is not requesting units from the Destination Resort Density Pool This development falls under the Beach by Design: Design Guidelines and . The design of the proposed Hotel respects the Beach by Design: Design Objectives in the following ways: • Bulk: The bulk of the building is broken down by stepping and color changes in the fa�ade and by maintaining the minimum 15 foot front yard setbacks and increasing the building setback along the west and half the south frontages to 21'. These measures allow for the required sidewalks and landscaping along the perimeter of the site. • Density: The 102 rooms proposed for this development are optimal for supporting the cost of the development while still allowing for the onsite parking and the overall building to fit within the parameters of the development code. • Height: The requested 65' height is within the "T" District and Beach by design standards. • Design, Scale, and Mass: To break the apparent mass of the building we are stepping the footprint horizontally to follow the curvature of the site, stepping the building, vertically, to create a discernible base, middle, and top to the building, and varying the window types and openings. The length of the building is also interrupted by building steps, balcony placement, color, height variations, and material changes. • Proposed materials and colors reflect the Florida Coastal Vernacular while also addressing the requirements of the prospective hotel brand. The design of proposed development contemplates the emerging character for other redevelopment within this area. We believe that with the burgeoning land values and the generally aging structures in the area create a positive environment for redevelopment and future development proposals for the area will be similar to this proposal. Specific design elements include: (i) The proposed building facades are stepped to break down the mass and to create movement and liveliness and interest to the design, (ii) Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, string-courses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; (iii) The building's fa�ade design includes a variety of balcony and railing styles, string course type banding, and a variety of awnings and low roofs to further enliven and differentiate the fa�ade, (iv) a stucco and stone veneer is proposed to accent the fa�ade and to address the hotel brand requirements, (v) The building has several window and door styles, sizes, and patterns of organization; (vi) As required by Beach by Design the design steps the building back at the 35' height. With the stepping footprint and the building step-backs the overall building has tremendous design movement and liveliness to the fa�ade; (vii) While the building is essentially limited to the 65' height, we have modulated and accented the roofscape with red tile roofing alternating with a decorative parapet walls. Additionally, we reinforced the primary entrance and approach to the building (SV� by creating a slightly taller tower element (which roof is at a similar height to the elevator and stair tower roofs.) and accented the pedestrian and vehicular entry with a "Gate House.) In addition we added a pool level, roofed, Tiki bar, and roofed elements to vary the facade of the three-story garage. With the above architectural design features we believe the building sufficiently breaks down the overall scale of the building into comprehensible and more human scaled building elements. #128106v1 _. _-- __ _ � Pfa�ni��E Devcb�a�+�wt Dc�ent °, � �� ater �- � �� Comprehensive Landsc�ping�lpplic�tton U IT IS MICl1M�ENT!JK'�1 TME MI�IACMIi'TO SWMIT COMM,tTE ANO CI�tRECT MIff�RMA1'ION. AMf MISL�AOtN6.OECEt'1'IV�. M�IGOMPLE'�'E OR MICOR�ECt INFORMATION MAY NWIWOA1t YOWt A�rlICA1�ON. ALL APM'�#CA�'IONS ARE TO�E FIL4id 01J�'00MPLETELY AND COR�ltCTLY,ANQ fUAMITTW IN�RSON(NO EAX OR OEt1VER1�3) TO Tt1E'LANNIMti i OEN�.O�IIAENt'OQARIMENT sY NOON ON THE SCN�OIlLtO INADUNE 0l1TE. A?OTAL OF il COM�tETt SET'S Of rLMIS ANB AMLIGTION MATERIALS(1 ORt61NAl JW910 CONE'S)A3 R�QUIREO WITNlN ARE 1�0 �E �D FOR R!N!W �Y 1NE DEVELO'MENT REVItW COMMI'FTEE. SUBStQU�!'1' SUMIAM'�'AL fOR tHE OOMMI�N�Y �EYEtf!'NIENT r011R�, IF NEC�ARY, MtILL RE4UIRE ls CONI�LETE fETS OF 'IANf MIO MKIGTN�N MAT6RIALS(1 ORI�NAL MID 14 COM�4�. �WVS AND APPLICATIONS ARt REQUtItEO TO iE OOLLA'f�,SI'A�LEb ANO POI.OEQ IM'O SEf'S. TNE AM{dCANT, SY l7ltN6 tFpS A!'lKAT10N, A�aIIEES TO COMPLY WITH All AKIICA�LE REQUIR�AEN�'4 OF TNE COMMWMIiTY DEVBOPMd�T GOOE. PROrERTY owNQt(��t 0�0� BaJ'F.�lSnade Prg�LLC MAtLING AO�RESS: �S C�3k.S�e�,C,amb�r�A!A OZl!! -- PHONE NUMBER: 61�,lRf#'P5 EMAIL: D.ID�?T�eD�dV�oam AGENT OI!REP1tE5EtfTA?iVEa C�oq,�[eroe k As�da�!nc MA�fNG AOORE55: l�i?2 US fftq:L!lVorth.Pa/at ffar�6or,FL$�t8ld � PHONE NUMOffR: ftY-7b�01� EMAII: A�sa�r.c� .�....... - AODRESS OF SUBIECT PROPERTY: 65�B�l6�l�t�Cl�tl+er'.F7anfda .�.�. DESC.R�r�oN of RE4uESr: �'�'�mep6c�d�eMofa+ee�,patmsandsbnr�r�ed�nr�re�aar �P�N � � � P�'�'� �eez�jm me ro¢r�md�rae�ya«f� (�ndr+ak a�r�t+�e aoeie 1►a�ty: •��••�••, �QN�� anoenr cra�s asd caaop�e�.du�ro rr�dwaj&p�a�e as�tNu sa�/s�aeaw P�+�9� h�C � � �� - s�lot wi�l�spec�k YsC� STATE OF RORI�A.COUNIY OF'INEUAf �, / I, the u�de�nsd. adanawkd�e th�t all Sworn u��nd sub�uibeA be�ore me this �l s'b`" • day of �epresenhitoAS ma�e in this aplkat�llo� ar+e true and 2� v�,oo me and/or b1► accunte �o the best ef m�I lonowled�e and authori:e P Gty rcpresentaNvcs �o visit a�d � the � t�f�rlw is p�non�y k�wn� -�•�--- ProP�Y�scribed in d+is a�plicado�. pcoduced as identiftcation. ' � Si�ture oi property owner Or�ese�tathre pubNc, tltANO E. �I My commission expins: MMar ' � iN1l1 _ PI�i Orwlopn�t Oq�t.100 s.MyAh Avweu�.Clprvvaar,N�.S�7J�„ : p� �a�1 ot 2 o ; . Plaanla�&Developa�e�t L1�partment > � ��r Comprehensive L�ndscap��Applic�t�on .. � � Fle�dbilit�r Cr�teria __.� --� - - ��onsES m�oF rwE�vt(51 a�c�u��r a�n�u►oc�w�i�How.iH oEr�u.tr�atrtae� I��NQ�NATM NEIt TMIf COMMMtEHENSiv!LAN�ISCAMNN�i�Ito�oSAl.. 1. Mthitectur�i Theme: a. The la�dsc�n�ta a CompreMnsive land�cspir�s Pro�nm shaN 6e dr�ecl as a part oF tt�t archicartur�[theme oF the p�indP�buildi��{s PnoAosed o�dtveloped or+the parcel pfoposed fa the deve4apment. ?�b�p�e pr�ra�wd!!pr»vide a tt+optcal 1470�la�e tl�a�,�r��tm��6�' aa�I�r�a�ku�ers tbat�r+�In conhat wlth the bulld�rg's Art l�erao�� TWs tno,p�ca1 l�r�da htt�dy�e tbrer�r w�tl xlsn fio�die aesfheNc g�ls for tfk Old N'b�ri�6�1�as de�a�ibed wlthln the Baa�a�bp l�r'�r� OR b. The desi�n,ct+anct�r.bc�ion and/or materials of tl+�landxape tratment proposed in the Comprehen�ive 6sndscapins pro�+ shaN be de�nonstrab�r more atlttractive th�n land�capint otherwise pe�mitted on the pm:d Proposed fo� daMdopme�under the mini�r�urn landscape sWndards. 2 tlQhLi�g,My Ii�ttK pnoposed ss a part of a C�mprd+ensi+re landuapin`protrartE is au�omaticaliy oo�trotled so that the I�!#n�is tumed olF wl�rt die business is dosed. ��,��r�r��u��rr��a��r�ro �en�t�er� 1�an�Gk�kvd's mtll,be prr,�k�d�or�e bu��u s�er,+e as a wa,i►Bndirig /bradtor�aae f+ordx�r�t aa�d/ar other crfstaraers dur�ir�tl�r�nJaht Nm�e hour.�. �, �w�r Crior�er. The landsrrape treatment proposed in the Comp�n�ive landuape P�nm v�iil enhance the co�rnunity d�er o#the City of dearvvater. ?�x�r�d t�'rer�de lard�rape tnatrau►ts along dle rnadwa,�frorr�e wl�rh wil!ad to s�oRui the ov�erall tf�l a�d�c aFdl��r+ei�fiborhoad area, whlch cvmendj bas a�p�r�drg as tbe o�ra!/v�sua! i�n&as d�raad�al 4. P�perty VolY+t�,The landstape treatrr�ent proposed in the G�mpreh�tnive landsppin�pro�ram vriq have a beneflcisl impact on t�vaiu!of tli!prop�rty i�the immediatt vtcinit�t of t#��parcel proposed For d�veloprtKnG 1�e i�w�!lia�+e an up-srate v�usl aesthe�tc drre to�ie�r�o,pt�ed anat��d��e and��d�pi�g T�s w�ea�asce dl�arrrsll�isual�Iba ef dre Imnr�rllHe�a x�d�t�p�v�[ue of thc s�i��uq'��bar�ood 5. Specio�!A�a or S¢enie Co�mPdor Plan. The I�ndscape treatme�rrt propased in �he Comprehenifve la�dsape Fro��m 1s co�istent witfi arry spedal ara or saoic coKidc�pl�n which the Cky of dearvrater has prepa�ed and adopted Wr the a�ea ir+ which th�ps�cel pr�o�x�ed for de�re[oprnent is bcated. As sfat+ed prc�lp,d�e trnpl�l Flor�a landscape t�w/l!folto�v the a�'he�caaals f+vr Il�e Old Ftortda �ss�esa�cd withtn tlr�Beach b3'Dr�l�re r'e9ul�r�n��t� . _ _ _ _ M.,,��a o.�.iop,,.nc 0.p.�nn�,�oa s.uhrra•�wew,ca..�w.e.r,�.s»s��.i:rlrau.�ssr Fa�c rn-�2-�u�s �.=ot t ie.�r�sad o�r�i CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR: DeNunzio Hotel PLAN INDEX VICINITY MAP �� SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH,RANGE 15 EAST 1• COVER SNEET Y Y=�� '' � CITY OF CLEARWATER� FLORIDA 2. �sT�"a�oNOirioNs a, srrE ruN N 0. PAVING,GRADIN6,DRAINA6E 8 YTIYTY PLAN ou a � � � �� 'J. OlTAILE 8 CONdTRUGTION NOT[S � 8. DETAILS I `°w�c Y ""'"� N Prepared For: F 81TE DATA � ' Bay Esplenade Project, LLC .,�o.,.,�,.,..,..�.,4,.v,,.�.,,.M,�. ,.�,�..,,�.,,a,.,,�„�.,..�.,..,.,�„d,.,.�.,,.,� 305 CAMBRIDGE ST,SUITE 3 �•��m�� LEGAL DESCRIPTION CAMBRIDGE,MA 02141 �..:;�.�,��.,�F�.�� ,,�:�,.�..�:,m Ph.(617)945-2555 �°'°�� .�,��.�F°�..�a.��a o ,.ao�.o.o.�.�>�a„�wE.�w�,�P.a�.,�a.,..�,�,o. ��..,.a�o..� DJD@TheDeNunzioGroup.com ....�.� , a��»��a.�,,�s�,�o,. o.,�a,.o�e��aE�o�a owE,,.:�w.rc a�o..,o.z.,w�,��.�:� m.,.w eaano'w '°`•o"� ar�aoxi �wDSV ro�� --- - - ,,�c.cc w�w xowm,o�a.,o r *o.a arv�ar.cE�..;�sz�mm�x� i�l•'.Hnu�n xn..x�w..s nowsemn nK ur) MMlOY�COMqipIM fO110Y1OlIAOIIM u�disrn[wa.aiaiMa.��l .�o. ao.P.�z,.� ..w�.zo.P.�.�,�,�E o�K��os a�w�E.�.�« Prepared By: KE,. ,o,r oau eP,�.i:,.,�aui.� a�. zoP�=,.�PU.a�.�aP�aaTMEP��«��aP�ELL.=�, ....LMA .�.�� .... � .,��.,a�� z�a.�.,.�o�.a�=oP.�.e�TMEP��mR.ELL.=� .... �s��.��_, �°" ■■�■Landon,Moroe 8 Associates,ine. ;"�"'�"TM,••""„�`�°°°�°'E�"��,�"`��"°°F"��„� arY t Envkonm�nw enylnNrs•Plannus•s�srayoa 'ROJECT TEAM �tw u.s.u Monx r�ar wiiuo�,nauo�aws REVISIONS �MM�(fi1�1MlOt0.!m(ml'l�f4iM.TM Inr tJW6D1M0 � YYYYYYAYNMOIIROY F�i�OY� n.l�.(�s�l��e5i��og.nmpwrve�hgmm a RqpnlSVm�i.�cleavaierFlaw.vtx ;.�:ie�oi�s„�e;6"�v:��e�.��'�, PERMITE �.� �.r v>,i�s<zsa.w�:��,��e.re� �:r c;zi�`.FSy��, �.r n�se,.e�e, ELEVATION8 REFER TO NAVD 88 DATUM ��„ ,,,,,,,�„1O„��,�°'�".'�'�, � UNLESS OTFIERWISE NOTED I�+�e�io�o��TMW+��,�r�� I wreu suwrwua.a,r .rHo-w�whooimw�s�un :OxcRsW�YSr_"�rvo�� qEauu� s�fo��fas�c��s��w��ii�i�qnw o�ES�wv��N�uuwa�m ,�,�.:-�x�;�i E .��,..�,o��,��a,,,. "N��,�� o��""�'��s,.,E��,.�.�,;�,.:n,�� APRIL 10 2013 ��.��..,'"��,�,��o�. ��e��,��.�a,,,�,��.. �osssa�o+aoo CRAPHIC SCALE I t� . ._'�e�ro�a . _.— LEGEN� � � n P.00� m-caENeFn[s�x �� i vue v-��i��ww� �r.. ._��, � I 'p•p 1 .-v�Kna[ �� T�0 YsG POIE � I ��T 3 ■-PCU.YfDMIfMYf[R li o-IKa/YO MRM YN�[ -swiwr gn ywnc k � � II �i �'a�9 � �I I I 1 I . � i� q e-rt�imn�rtrcsrx � ° � �,n:.�6�`o`�r�" � ��I i . � i.w�wn � niu s�imr cWC I�� am[�cac i$� �nao caz �� '�� ii� 1>�''y°0`n i_�� 4 �,off'.,a�i--I � i. �° r —, • I � ---�--- � � �� . � � �;.,� � ..� � � — -.�- � --�1 bd wi;�, � _=�===u`�°�� . � ---- - - -- _ - u �a 6��4.��.�. � /�� eon u�'n i1I --�--_u&51cM5MUE E � I I r, �� I ��qon�m.�� r I a�µrt i.er I THE FIVE PALAIS MOTEL, __�___us sm�xn uc aa wn rvr 4 I il lr� "rt I �� . usu[xu[rtaunim.v i I �� I �•x �^ +'m�^'�� 1°'��"'" � i� ya� A CONDOAIINIUM _�� I � il � 1 ��°O' � „x�,. „R Ili I, CONDO P.B.73,PGS.69&70 _�� . _.-o= � � II �a g g' LOT 11 � �111 m w=v� :�>� §. � I �� or z "'�",� � BLOCK 82 I� u reRCea s � � {�� I� � :w�a,�ff� �" � $g � PARCBL Y 1�� . � II I y � ° .� � �.,...,,��», "` � I" �'��' �t-� .��\ � I 'd I rx a� •� .�ii =v il� � �� 1 � `� �� I '�i I� � LOT 13 � . . — . . — . . — . . — . . } i� ,.{'�'w,�� d � � �� '�oe�or. a PARCSL 5 n= �i � �� e 'I i I . . . — . . _ Cu�wO � '�� '. � i i r' i .�I �ii � 0 �m`..` �� / �� ii � � LOT 12 n i �° . ..,� iii � no.M. :. �nc I`� +x PIRCBL 4 �� PARCBL 1 W� �n � . wo.,a „r �4 ii /( i�i d° S LOT 8 = i u I +`�� .�.�g.,..w w `�i /I �� I'° BLOCK 77 ;'<I �° $ , � ;,;M, i� � '� � �v�cµn U ¢ �x i� �� LOT 1 %� roc m�. �.��. �"� ryc // �� ` J 0 0� � i' �� PIRCBL I �p - � �� ° = J �( �� s.�,,� �.�.:��r�u.aw>"_�r', �p —�— ———�———~::,w� � / ��=r '' e ° ,o.. '" O D U � i�� '� /a�`'°� �".r=�_�-__ __=____�_ ___-=-__%---�Y=`-= - \ '��'' 4''rL� =m Q � ;;I I � f�-=--`"_ � ---- - - - - ;; � � a�� m�m„c n,v��r � ��i �� ;,s,%'"� �p�pDE� — �� '��.. _ —•—7�r''�� I I en'a°�w"�� j,�� m 9s,.e'o„�,�.u.c4 . .o a��a��,..0� � ,�ro.sm�crK«. � � I ��' � BP'�E�.r � � �I - q ' ' 7 o3c �� ,I� � � � � »� --�------------•----J \ a �m� I ��I I � /// ��i�s' `p�-�1B.r �J (A'2 �I� I r/( �/��/ � mos�a�m u�m' oiam wvoo urs�� Q V W�4 I N � ,�f �(�'.v.j T i? a-n��e�i �j� � x• L J� l6 uri ii�I �I� I � ro i/Y %�/ ��/ m �.�. .w»v� 1�� f' /�// �;� ��\ /� ,�.,;�, -��.�, .._,,�s,� o,�.; ,_� � �i I � �� -� i � i� ` � �' �:v�.�, � i�i ; � �i , � _ �__ _ � o - �.�._�..� _ � �� i �°x; r'/' ��'� .� �� - - _ Q-! �!� , � i ,,.-asx�l f / � �,"°a._� ��f� ._ . y 1 T� m _ ;. — ��i�� wv- •ro�m � ' �/' I :� �' ....... � ......�.. .�.., �.� �`, m.'�".�.a ls➢._q..� ., c ..n.o�m A....a� �°` ..e..m,� �...�..w..� �� c _ MWATERPOLLUTIONPREVENTIONNOTES ' . � �"'°m�°"`�°°` ow.�+..� — r�o,..,�a.a m �e,m.b«ca.�,�,o,....��ro,m.a....m ,.�.. v-.-" m�ncam. 9r� ;. . j�. ,F � � �� W..�..w,�� '°�,.,.�..�,�a��,�.��k, ;,:�_-� — � -�r��. ,� ~'n 1�- , �,,..,� ..�.�� a � : .v�.�.,�::,::�,�, � Y: ��_�-" �.� .� -� o ;� °' T� ...m.e..�..�r �� — INSTALLING A '� INSTALLING A "G gi``y-,` INSTAWNG A ��n��`��i'�' ..o�.� o a mnmw�. . FI R FABRI SILT F N- FlITER FABRIC SILT FENCE � �'� FlLTER FABRIC 9LT FENCE��p�� wa e..aiw m.,.wn� s�,.�m � �� .�: �:. . o,. .n �v� ._ i TZ�, °^ ... a' _ :OPVRIGHT I013 —�Re.�awee.�u.�m..emmno�.��wn.m�r. I tl� •s��•o� y�� H � ,�p-:�:a4� EXISTING CONDITIONS T oF 6 GRAPHIC SCALE o ,a n « o �'. m� �: __._.-.._ ��P �;e�`��',. ;�a �� t.� S�� s =y� iFr,FHO ; 3�� ' � �"_��„„�µs., a� ��n i o-p.mro�e e � LOT 3 �OT 10 � a-x�u�iwm��r� r �� _'s e eEa�mr.rza.r �� ii wr �-� �. . ii ° P� w,mir � � ,a�� i a-�mia�pau" dl �i �.,�rK,i � '�E�°i�:.� �'e� mrrtcs�w+cas. �� a�i P4 �i - . -�-o �� g tt�simrce.s �� ii � _ _.ertn�vk�c i i cwsmucr aece�.r wxecnori vo e�ww..0 �r � - Ww vi s - q � axwwsm —��_____ �ru� ' _ � wr _ . � ' ba �� .�..n. , --�--- �< �F � � roor wu P�> �n r. j�m � •r.a BE1aV e'wa1 wI1 � �--f- � w f .r � .Yri1Wx A1fA ull '� I ° I � .• I I i FtnulllYUU' �¢ � � i oo �.o�u.os�.��v�,�eu.�.c ssre..�. °'° - i� � THE F V PALMS OT L � a � � � .��:":��,"�R� � .. u�r v�ur� � � a rPae°ss"aµo°OY 1 ' „ .I. � I E M E .. ad srca urc � 6„��« . , . -: , ._.�.. .�. . ii • � . . . . ad�au�=w��rcu . � �� '• � A CONDOMINIUM °EA � n y � �i � � � ��m ,�, CONDO P.B.73,PGS.69&70 � � °�� A.r� �,� �o�ec O� p � � " � r -aw � 5 g� � �� , '� wP.�. � " �� . � m`� � .o-ow� � ' I i� � �.. ��..�.."`m � �ii'i �I��i i!.C��m�� a ■ y r �, ��,�.�,.�o ��x b. � � � ' _► .a.� .,► °i� I '��z �� —„ ' i a ,, �, i I � i�' I I cgE �:� a,., � i'i�i I��i�� !!; � i�� I .�n�w n�«:Fin" p � � O i� i �i '. iiI ��•I. � I _ I I � lii �It'� —�Y J ��i e... '°:i:. i, `p i �i ' J � •� � i �' . i � 'II � �V � II 1 I _ - iu � • r f, in �i � 41 x _ w � 'ii ,�.i o�w�.wE�w �i O � � �� I �jl '��i �� PARCEL I �� N�e . .� I� �u ' I m.wcia. °'°"°x"' i � lii �i I L0� 8 00 ��io i � � - � - - - i� I � BLOCK 7? � d� � �'� � a.ni�g� �d � _ _ � „sa.� .w� �.�x �<<Ek -� - '�� i � cucaxp 0 w $ i �� s �+ I � :iz:�s� — _ . �� ' ' C¢ �O'"° I �� •I I � �.� � / . �� ii �� ° ,.e. ,d. 7 Q �E< d � � / i . __ . _— '` __ -- __, i �,�rn1t�-i 41 V �V � iii � � "' � ..�'=5=- - � - -- �� i `�'� l j^ �,1 d ' ! �/ / I �s��s I � T .,�,,,,, ��I �•-.I•• / � � rv Pi�E_ G Y/.ut(a Mv�'roKY �/ / I '�&�[�µy I 7 (� I I�� I / ii �� P1 C'\ � mu�al rEn un ff�a er�scv��.rms . � � � �II �]� /�/ / /J` ��R I :-I �/ / �� I V� � i��/ bE wrcspieaxrccnw � i I� I � �uc(o�.wnio�m ��I �� o�r"a� uo iw I �I� /// / uci eun(w wvn�os � �� ., �/ ��a°�sa��,' � �� I i ° \ �—=''�� I �' �� °� � , �� J�� ' ::::a a � / I � ' �oP�R��HT�0,3 q� 6 3 __� SITE PLAN T oF 6 I CRAPHIC SCALE .nii.re�m.ar�rarw.a�e.o�.�� I �. m? �i�„<n"m tl. •.w. ,m�...n.atl.� +.r.....a.........�..ve.n..,....�o.s.�.�...w....wu•n.��..�...�,.. ..w.. �� .a...�..w�r�.��wx�....�..�.�..U�.s.,.i.�.,..«.�....�..w�.........�...�..w��w�s��.....er�.dan �� .w�s.e......�w.ro ..r��...ee.aw..�...w..�.+.v.oi........ee..�.a�...+w..�`......�w... ��. �W� LECEND �� ', �_ i o ��arcsru �i� ��K � ■-�.�E"�"µ' ii r=n I =o� & �€w � AEa,�m..�w�hw =�s psixa�wms�.mµw Y �b I �t�� I vw � e � I wwr.s�orw� �o� _itutiia[rcocstu { I�'S I �/ I 0 1Q�qp�VF➢[5tx �A'��o�.Yi�FeO�0.rro�� i hMLLiMw�WilF�6inIXarw�rz� I -�1fA�h'.£ - -oz I 6�r R ' ^ I I ______ 5 e±. �x n �p� �y I 4 I � AKr�T��R J ' { ————_ eyyFq�NC ' 4 � A 1 ��.�,I I ,i i � h...� � I I �� __-__ ��,� � a°� �g w�a oe�xc ar¢� I F—� if]Y wxi R)� xv.. � I"�°p � �p � � ��Ntq OoSIq • _ ��[ ��u�r uM � � u �� msmic awe � I I ( eo C �ao P ou) � �UV� m�rc `� �� € � � 1 °°r°1� ,�} _ ?� �Y„��,,.��„� ; � �r a. �°�"�.� „��..��.«.,� '� '� �� I 1 �,�,�� c�"s.wc`w.�n � g�� m�n rm�ei6 ��evnu swe� � ' � � .eu ax ta�.ar a , /,;�il� ._"° .�,�auec n..,� � t4' 1� .� �•I r �.�o _ G„ �° � .�-�,�.�., �_W��..�� ..��.a� =,s��.W.. ��i n�xgw. I I I � �awRia� �_ � �� W � ,�y ' Y .. � J � � im �\��n../zm :�- � ��r � � �` � �2 q .w a�nN.xu��/ I � i m��M '_-� -[� �� i�U Um .i � I 'f � � Q Q ��a � � rr. � ' � v�r�am 1.� �t � �� Z m Q�� I r �w,na r�..,.m ;�� r's, v swc ;,°v'n,� � o� a p� � w �� • �� . .�� , � � '�� ,� �,�.,,. � , �„� — i .�..,,,� _� o ,� __ i i � � � ,�� . � i � �.x;; — �- o�. , ,_ _ N Q �"� ��,u.�.�. . � � 7 � �� I i � m- ---------�--- ----�� =�/-- �'� � • Z w w" I � , ��, - _�-�---- / ,��,.,��,,�.�R II � � �- �- ��-' �j ,i—' m ��,��,°'-�i ��' r�, �,.-�., � � ,�� —'—— m � I I m. �s�—=-------------�----� � «,,. I � i �� ' a�� L � �..�.«._�. � i ` �� „= 9 I � 1 , �i.,,,�'�� / ,��..,�M,.�.,� � �+� �� , za I ��_'-� ,.,1 A�P �� _-;�,,, _-�_.�__ ,, .o Wa�� E � � �, �E� �. ��..� =.��aW,�aA�Ea��a��um�.o,��.�.�,W��., =��k�� , ; � � ; � w�=,s, .ti ..,�.�PEA�E�n�,m�R�asµ.��.��E.�..��«.�µo�ww�t� �� , , � E, on � �_ . L - ::::� �1� � �„-�;�; °;�—q ,� �._>,. �.��,�,��,� ��g��_��.o oa�.�.».s,��naE= ��„A,�,�x �� :.C.a a a ' ——1I __��__ �.�o. �•-� ,��Pw«��ww`.��,��p�.,�aE��nw,�.oE��o a,omEa,�ff �I � ,�_ ,,��A,�-o�9.LL aE R�>a��2,.o=,�..,�w�,��, ..�..nw�w�w,wc�aw.o s��.w,E�nw�n..a,� E.�EEa.�.,ro.�.o�,��,,o..�o ow,..�.�. µo.µo�+w.Ro�s v SECTIONAA •*�z SECPONe-s ALL[LEVATIONS REFERTO NAVD BB DATIIM "'�-s UNLESS OTNERWIBC NOTlD .oP�R��zo,3 5 4 � ""`""°"""E�'°� pAVING, GRADING, DRAINAGE � UTILITY PLAN E __�i �,.o�o��,w�,� T oF s UCTIOMTEGXNICALBPEGFICI1iNN6 W11TLRtYtTEMMOTEt .wwaa..e.wrs�nu. �a� r�wv�wrwnrr i�.��r � I .._. _,.�..,.w.,,.....�.m�.�.«...�.,�.,.,..�..p �„ ... �'~.._ ..rv`°"��:..�'"y"` ..r'-..r.��"•�""� I °°C �.�"o:.d.,... I ��.., �w�� ucnoNnores �y-�,�+ ��-�+�-+ � � o � g _e,,. .,.e.7.,,,. ...�.».,m..,�.e.�. ..:.'�`.."-"-.�e.,c'..`°."7..;..� � �........».. - . . �2��9 . .. . h,,...m....a_.e,..ti "' ,�... ...�-m. n��. � ,�.�...-�. ` � � M ..... . �3 _.�...�.e e�.�...,«>m.�. .�«... � � ...� �. ,.... . e . .r....�. ...,. ...m ..,.:-:.1::_-,.»..........,M-_ � � �� Y .�,.,�x, ,....<,a�,�,. ., a .,....m,...�. .._ ..��m. .. �.........._�_„e � ;''..°..•. '�� o�m '.�....u_W..�,..,,,.._;""_.�.,_....._.,...__.. ,m _.,.,.�_.�..o�......»�...._...... � "�„��:.'""° «..�h�.�,��r � ,.._.�:r..'� W�p ,�• ^�� f°�� CONCRETE SWALE Y�� - ,<+`�� tly +�m �� °�`�r�� '�'� cTREET AND pRIVEWAY RFPLACFMFNT FOR� OETAII O� •• ^-°-^ . R � � "'^��°�"'""��"'�"""'"�^�"'" ON R &AGPHA TI ON R T RFA VALLEY GUTTER C11R8 �� ......��"°"....�..H.m...y�...w..�.»�..+...+ �.m.� �`.�e-`°'7.`..�..`."...�......a......s.`�...�..�Y.. ��' o�.��..�a� fr a.w � ... °' � I y � . � �.. ' ._.. ` .. _..... �,'O� 1�r�`6��, � �2��.r � -....-,a'"+K•"_, .........�.�.........,...... �5,... .�+�"� � �� p;' "� § � ....�....�..,...'.�......~,.......,.......�.,.d.--,..,.. .� ....,.r..�....,...rm.+...w....�...�+ �e � f19 �� :.1 I'� � 8�$g�� - ,.. " xu�� ,_..,.._ ..:_��:�.�..._...�........._.. __,� �-.��.� .... `_ �_a �..�.,, 1 r..,�_ ..�.A..�1 r�� p �� ....,.,�.........,....... w+_.s...m...i-.� .Y..... �,e... 'e�^��'�La:w T F �— � � $ { � �� :I�..'9�.'.�.::.'��'.... '�2��.__..-. x �.•••-*,••••M»• p-• 0••. '"'•••'"�`.m••`•-• ro�wern�wve a ur es►uruoe mw w�r�arRUCrax xo�� ::�• � — ' •••e••• i �� 1 i �� J- � o � 6 f� �� ...�� r1i��. • ' ..��.,��.p�...,«��........,,.,�....s....._.m.,... _.:�:�.�..w �..._..._....q".e.._......r.. =��'—__ — L�,-,.�T � LI— T � �,d. - �•.:.,.v,--'2;�^- � ....Y.._�...,.o.:�.". �^' �4s�-`�'-?'ir�^+,s`:•�•'Y .., a�no��. �ab P� �c_ w � ,s.s.. .. . d..�..,...,�..._.... . .... ..,. ......�....� (YWC�L SIDEWALK CONSiRUCTION k RAMP�OETAIL MN£EZ S7[1?S IIL�NfFAPlEO L1]VGPFIE ��m�.Y...�,.,,......`..�..tl^^^ ��.......,.... .� ` ..��.<.b.....��.q.....Nw ��.=�� —...o� ...e., �= J ...._s...�.....m��o w �...�.e......�..�.. ,e ..,, .�..^�..�...��a...tlw.�� `� �� '�� `� Yj �� ....ee� °'� �� ]`(�-i'..... ""7h7z � a�ry8 . , �y�...��,.a,.�...��..,......,..,..,_m..�, �— ��.......,_.e_........�m.�- :..,.,. j " 1A�" .�.�.� �°= -��n`(\ .,_ 0 W ��3 "" ,.....a,..�.......,.,......,......,, �-�.._.�..,,.�.......4.�...,...w.._.... O � v�a— ��m.s, . —'�»_� —`�r� N� m�"� �/ � r �= L Cma �...+.�.........�..�.....:$:�.�.... �._ ;�:' Q.� � I—"� =�.:v:.�. g- �` Z� p,i� _ ,�m ..�.... ..�. �,��..�:..^�':,.d'°�.:�'_ � I "'�''�' �'"` �►J vr n - , �� ,s�s`_ � �-` Q U W� ... ^ _ ..,�........�.». � ,n,,,�6.�..�-3�°.:..9w�..�..,"="�,�.^.....�.,o ��;.I .A.. _� ! � � U m .,,,,,,„,e,,,,.,,„,,,.,..,,,,.,,..,,,„.,_,,.,,.,,...„,,..,,,.,._,. ��R,��F��,�� TYPICAL DOUBLE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SiALL M1 naexrcasvarErNOrra� �wrECnoMOfsroa�w�nwr�uufES °" .._ " TYPIC�ACCESSIBLE SIC:_DETRII .. ..,....�..�a m..a.e..w....w�..�.e :�`e` .....r�wrr r+✓rn.a........��r °�mFU u� �.. ,. . n..e.+......�...� �r�..s..i�.e... T w.. ii.:r wwrai..... ......r.�o-b."'..�i.n":=�,..�...o.+,...,.m,........�.. .:::..�:':'.�7..`.+'....,_.....��..�-.�... g,�"'"m_`�SV�+.�,m:a. �'C'�'�,.�.�"..�-..,.M,.,..�.. y' ...�°s.C::�..,w�...�.�e...-..a..e .�........�. �1 � � �'tv-^ ...�.. � f � —{�� .°:A' W�S.',T::-._.... , �... � � � IWNLOCAiMNMOTE6�� II--a�/�. 'I ' •�••�•�.."6u•�•`+• :�s^„°.'..."�....�...r e.�......m..�.....�.. �-a�K—�7 ..._,nr ��$% �°a��.�.�- .m ......,.,,..,_. -.. m.. �g�:� � �.is.. `� �M ��£ ° ._�....:�o°;�.- ._.'� _,..s_ �.,..�.�„�>,.,�..�....>.«. �1 f� _�..�..�... ..._. _ _..._� p� w�m�� - .._... •— ' __ _ . "'"=� J�� i �~F�~ ��..-.r�-a�.-�r.` SANITARY SENER MANHOLE CO�ERm4 � � ��C .a.......w.,..,.n.......�..�............u...s mCAST IRON. �� :OPYRIGF�3013 S �-�� DETAILS & CONSTRUCTION NOTES ; oF 6 �,..� :=— r.�-sr— �N�o.rn�saw�ow. a... ' _ _ _ ' I ��`� T i�xzzSz:��r.r.•r��..._ • ---�- �;- . �� r�� .,..�, -%- - — ""^'�:.:::.^S'...f .. = °$�'-si-smss�:�.scr._.�Y _r aemr ___- `r' .= w�� •s°��.....,.�.. � =:z:.�� :�_. �� `�l -- gg � � �Y _,.�. .s — I�- .:�=-- ,� ._ g �4��,...� o '�""."��w� °..'�' ��..".�.".� -.. ��.s i � ��Y.�""' F�� _y� �� ---� :.�� I-_�, �� GREAS£/N7FRCEPTL4P "6 '��"7::�m �� ..�� rw�amEVmu xwxur �TZ�^4K"� '� �� 750-1250 CALLQV 'ff �� ',$� - �� pE �YgNL�g� �,�• � _�... ' � � ..a +.C.`.........« � � �*'� cw�ai �.,. . pr�{. - �c.A��"°'......"' � � � � ___ — o�y ""_'°'��"'�°°"°' �`_"'I�m".a,w+,a awi I��7( r�;.I �......�.,�,�•, �cy,w..,r'� ��$'��... ......._�..,��.�/�._.�� .'°`............. mr�am, ,w,,..�m �3 ` �..�,mu�..� � ��.� .�,.��-•��y ..�.. �L W -N-o= � ��lS:s- • p3' � 4 ., �:.d. = ..`.od.�, .....,�� _._� 9J�� ° � ��eg s� ,a��d.,� ....,.. - � ., � a � � STeTS�� - s.�.um i vc��c aa m. . a ruu 3 x>m �� d � �r �� 4nsa� � 3 I ,,/ ,.�..�.....�.�m �°�� 44�47� �I� � � i #�� "'°`°°:.a./ L°��a� e�`v°esWJ �...,,_�,. '__ . � iw:� ': PVC PIPE 7HRLST RFC_7{tAINING TYPICAL METER SETS W/ a � 9 ��~emw��TYPICAL FIRF HYORANT cFT71NG � ^�y oa BACKFI.OW PRFVE�TERS 1-1/;'h 2'IAODELS � 5 5 �# ""— ..... liw'� .._� �-r �l ' �•x`..x � � ti°^ � `� I I c..�w.+.�rlw.rn•r ° a�� ...�o o..........� o ° +-M.�°:.�... � L......�....... �� ...«...o.. ""'°'° ,o,�°°'°', H' Y\ U ...n �........ '"�� ..._mo � �� .� �� o._omn n.�^ww.� � J � ....W .�,,.,... ...� M UQ �� ...F""° a o.. ..��... �.......� .._�� y*,....�..,� ....�,.e ""� . .�o�m :,�� m ......�.a�.°:d`,�r:. O W �8 . _ � � � y _ e�a� O 0� d�� e.� '�`��a�._'P""':��.:: �.'"`" �m��4=�:�„�:°�� -.__...� -� ,>.._._ -°-- .,"... N a ��w� �W�� ,�TYPICAL COMPWND�WATER METER SET µ TYPICAL��COMPOVND WAIER METER SET pARALLEL uETER SET �� CHLORIN.BION TAP =Q �� 90°RISE 3' 4'd�6'MODELS 45' � 4'k 6�A10DEL5 ��. on.� rn.m.o�ar. °^'°°°°' ' ,�.ma�,,. ��a,.>> ..� .., Z o,` _ -- _ -- ..� ..�, ,�^s - G� W� .... ��'m"°�.� .� _..,�.�.. � '�"'. m �` .�.,,�, � .a..� .. --� --... � � � �..� �� .e �,N.._a �� 6�..�,��°,��„�,� � � � � � nam_,� __ .w.. .�_� �� POND UNDERDRAIN DETNL ��W tl�� y � i y � � PLAN 2: _ ,5.00 , s. J�� o �� J a �� `�'� � i�� f ', �� ', � - .__ �� ,�' '------� a.00 ,,.00 �'� --- / s� � — � i O i O i P faec �°�° ° ;; %% � ' � Wdth :7.00 ORIFICE DETAIL ' �'�" ____ _________� Tro<k :6.00 ---- --� �«k io�ook rme :a.00 +�*.s SECTION A-A Steering Angle :31.6 SECTION B-B ,,,s __.'__ __�� .—_.-__—_ � r�.t.s. ------ F.D.O.T. INDEX 232 TYPE D •MODIFIED• :oPVRic� so,a OUTFALL STRUCTURE s2 S s THIRD FLOOR'DEAD END'7URNING TEMPLATES E ��-- DETAILS T oF 6 PCL XL error warning: I11ega1MediaSize warning: I11ega1Mediasize Warning: I11ega1MediaSize Warning: I11ega1MediaSize Warning: I11ega1MediaSize Warning: I11ega1MediaSize Warning: I11ega1MediaSize I � e 7 �!. � I I I I I ' ' ��e�r�um�civa� �� I 1 ... ........... , , � � . . ,. I � � `°w"° � . . . �. ....'' � I I � ; O, ,-, : O % I i h� � � � � � � � D � . . . . . . , .. I I C , .._," �V ' I�m ... . . . .. I � M �^c.'"` .�'W' e.,.o � 1 ' �9 , � _, F i I � � m _......; w�.°M�`e..'� ra. —.,r _„�,. i � I� � ..:K "�w I � � wsiw o . ; � • � w � a I � ,m. 1 E 1 1 1: -s--= I m W W g� � g y,� � � I � �.�..W � �C 1 ; i � ;- O: � � � a z , � 1 . ...... �- ; € ' = � i : . .. - - I i 1 � g j��a .� �,ob '., O �� k ° ,� "� :...................... W ,�.. . ; W < � I 54I M,.� �-._..—.--- �� N Y I� 1 1 �� . �n„µ..o�.w„rc¢ '_T_.._"'_, -a—^ I� ww�a O �I� ' i K ( �e ; � ............_........... i i namw a ; I ��. w � � � ---- � _ ,r..�.� — ------------� . U � � 1 � �M $� .�..� ��--'�� I � � i i I � �� ---- I -�--- �-----' �� '' _�- ------------� c'�y J � �� '� $ 1 � � � � � ti� � I'� � � O q �.crS � �_ � �� . . = LL a ,p I � i �� .�� * p � � � i � �� ,,��P�E � -—�' C � ai c � j �� i� ESC`;/ � $ �'v I I i � ,' /'' �� Z � w a � y �,E � � �� / � U mU ✓ /. � /. II l .e - _�'� /, � FIRST FLOOR PLAN esra--- /' — I / ssoeay�spa�ude:aem�rcxcommomuon DEN12.02 Level PrincipalUse AcreuoryUse Garage No[es wuwwtmF: L-6 36,125 0 0 P13fIS �-s ie,us a o �� 44 35,505 620 ExercizeROOmasACCasory � L-3 5,080 0 18530 �a� 42 2,650 2,690 18510 MeetirgROOmandVrefunctbnasAccezsory 2013.04.10 l-1 4AL` 1,3/0 16,300 BreaNast Area as Accasory;LevN 1 is above Base Flood Ekvation ToWk 59,500 4,650 53,320 w�r: 7.82% %IkcessorytoPrincipalUSe A-001 POINSETTIA AVENUE _ _ CHEROKEEAVENUE(PLAT) ea Puauc Rnv - _ �------ -------- � ------- — i 4 - - � [----- -z� ------- �..,b...�� r----, --------- --- � ' ------ ------ ---; r---, � �- -- -- ----'- ' �--��_� � , , � � � -- � i � \ �. �� i � ` � \ � � �-� � � ' � � � .\ ` � \ i i = . �--� i \ � �� i � �` � � # \ ` ` � � -_, . � �-- ' . � �� ` j 3 ..M , - \ . � , _ E .... _. ` � �� ... '__"""'i � j"f:... �", , 'o� ,� (�,> I< _� , , ; � i ' `--� ! , a � � , :..._� � \ ` , --� ; �� i `� `--� 7.�-- -- � � ;--' t � _ -- � . 1 o� � ; —.�. a I � .,` � .c .__, ,___....__„_� --� � m � , ' .............. .. ::.,�:::::::::::::. � N , - C£g+�� \ s __�� tn .c � ,1 6 .................__ � ....................... �� ..... p � ._...................... $ ................._._..."� �z \ 1 � a --,� �� .o , , _. _ . � _ .. � , , g � ; � � _ _ _ _ p � --. , ,--. _ , � , , o . , , . s I � , .__, _ �,, --, Z � .__. o � � , , � �-- . , � , .--. , , � � .�... ; - � �� I � � _ -- � � _.. I I ' � _.. € .....:::::::..... .. g- . _... .. ` .. . ......... . � � o � ..r......... � � :�........._:. I � ; , _........... � � �--------------. .-----------_-- � � � :-----�-------: � � , e � , ...�.. __ � , .. � i � , P � ---_� � ' ' I ' I ° ; ' g ' ' ', ' as W.sa�� I I � --- ---- — � � �_��„–�r.�r. ,� � @ ��S�l�� ,\ ___—_---- -- sss"A°�a`�� p €g ��9 °°i __—_�--� __�-�a� � �� -'�— 3UdMd'1dS3 Atl9 � °� ° x [ � � �R � �p� Rg 8 � y � ; � �� m� I I I�I�� DeNunzio Hotel � � � �' �m �Z ClearwaterBeach,Florida � �� °" O S N� N ,`,�. N a s � Bay Esplanade Project,lLC , > , ^ � z�;,�s .. .y c. Cambridge,Massachusetts " '--' � '` POINSETTIq qVENUE _ _ _ CHEROKEE AVENUE(PLqT) oo'we��c ww - ' �------ i _ 4 __—___—__ — - - � [----- -Tt+we.nw--______ __Mwnr.w�,srx �� - __�� -- -'- 1 _ - ___ ` ` __ _ _ __ _ \ � \ _ \ � � --� `\ �� p � tl �\ � � � � i � i � � � tl \ \\ I I Y J I \\ \ ` � S � E ` ` \ a � X 1\ � � --� � ` ` � ♦ � � � \ \` � � .. ... .� 4........ __"'I'"''�O q_ '_� i, ' I h � _1 � � � \ ` � ` ! ! F I �--' -- �� ; �� _................ j � �--• a ; " t "1 � � \ ;-- 8 .. y - \�N ` `�, ._h....... .. .............._.. "�, �� ` 1 � .................... ..................... __� � _ _ � 4 � -� � 1 � --�� , , �,.. .. � , , , , __� � � i , � � , ._ , __, , ,__. __ ____ , _ '� � 0 ; � � , , I , -- , �--. I , � ,.,.----� �-� � ; , , � �- _, , � � �--� � ; m " ` ' � �� x � :_ ................�-. - m , � � ......................... .......................... � " ii .._..................... .......................... � � ' o - .�, .�. __ , _ ; . . . , , . _ � , , � _ I ; . . - � � � `----------'-� t-�--------- E� I ' � �......................... � � -a— •-----�-------' i � �. v ........................_i a � I 1 I 1 . .,_,_...... i � I N M g � � i �:; 1 �:'SL'as�� I � i �`�;: i .�___ __' � N I \` I�-�w:aero�.ww+x-_� � I � ��,� '� �__ __ — ��o�ee�� -------� \ � �� °°i � �� ---- _�—- 3� � �._-----'__--- 3a��vs B aa a � � 9 € �7 � �8 S � D � � � r �m� IIIII I �g � � w Z DeNunzio Hotei � �� ro �� Clearwater Beach,Fbrida O � Q �� n� Y ... W o W g � Bay Esplanade Projed,LLC � Cambridge,Massachusells �.�.. �.. �. c.I::��>. POINSETTIA AVENUE _ _ CHEROKEE AVENUE(PLqT) ov Pueuc ww - ' �----- ------- . - ------- — � § - — � [----- —Ttrew�aa.-------- ._mo_r.._a��ra_ \ -- ��_ \ ; _'$__�'___ i ' � \ -- — -- \ `� `� � A \ �� k 9 � A Y �\ � � � i � i i .\ � \\ p � i i � '\ . ` _ ' a � ` � ' � � s s � � a \ � � � � � _ — � � � � �\ � N i � B \ \ � , � _ _ j � � & �\N ` . � � "n �C+`� � 9 - � , _ i �� r �\ � � � �� - _ J � �� __ , , � T � � � r � g 's I 1 - - � 8 � _ r s , � Q - : Z �I � , ; i 8 _ e ; � i _ S 1 $ a ; I ge � � r...� � �� x � � � � i p i I � 9 9 s I I I i �� , � I i� I � � ;� �r_==_=_ _��_:_a , ; �� ----- �� , , � � � � � �� o . , , � � , � �: W.�� i I i --- ---- --- � �-�a,-�-.�„ � �� . _____ -- — � ��"�°�°°!� '�— ---- �y�� °o�� _-- _- � _.---��,�,d� � � �---.---�— 34tlNV'1dS3 Atl8 e �§ § � `a ° � �� a � ; � � �m� I I I�� DeNunzio Hotel � � � � 'po � �� N � Clearwater Beach,Florida � �� A A a � Bay Esplanade Projed,LLC � � 'o . CamWidge,Massachusetts �> s?�t'�. �-.��:•;'��-c ,tt:�z.S• ..*,<> POINSETTIA AVENUE - _ _ CHEROKEEAVENUE(PLA� ao'w�euc ww " - �----- -------- ------- � o — � [----- —,rr+�e.--r----- 1, POINSETTIq AVENUE - _ CHEROKEE AVENUE(PLAT) ea we��c ww - - - �---—-- --—--—-- I� 4 __—__�-- — - _ � �;_�� —Ti�aw__��__�� ,�r�now�rr._mxn�� r �� \ � �� \ \ � `` \ \ � \ `� � � � Q � � `\ \ \ \ 1 1 I _ � � �\ 0 \ \ \ I I t _ `\ ♦ ` � � 0 \ ` \ r �` �` 9 A �\ ` � � � � - e � \ \ A , �\ ` -N I \ 0 � � � ` � _ 9 � , 9 \N ` Y \ + �`� � � 0 _ - _ 3 � � � I` ��C 1 ' _ ' :_ � 1 1 Q � � E� ;T 1 1 � � r � � � Q � � � � , - _ � , Z i � 8 _ - � I I I _ - . W I a � � 9 � - � � � � �� I � � �� a I I � ° — � � I I i i g � �d� i � � ' I i I �� i � � i �:FwlSd�� I I ( --- _ __ 1 � \ �—�„yew.tiwuTn� a �� . --—" ��"�°�°°�� '�— --- �@ �G�� eeg� 1 � �� --- -- 3i � ��------�y yia 3�nve 8 R� � � � € r }arp � �p3 %p 8 � D � ° � � �m� I I I I�� DeNunzio Hotei � f� 'o� R �� N � c�earwater eeacn,F�orlda � �P� . o da a � ' o � Bay Esplanade Project,LLC � Cembridge,Massechusetts �(�?:t �:�: � 2t �S a. ."�<<; � �� ; :.�' r ,. � ��;'' ,, ,__ , , ,` _.._.�� . _ _ _, — , :� �a:. � ��. � _ , s. �.:� ,�� .� . �•—... ' � � �� ou r � t .� ,,,.�' -"` 3 F1 a �"?" >2..: . ,_,y _ ,.,.• � .. ,i,.x. - — . ,,;,[I I �ll_. �..L.a.J._-.. . .. "' . . .....,.. * .. .,-- � �..o. .- IRi,-,' ,u. 'IIf . �. _ � 'k. � c1.� ' . ... " r.� J _r�c: � � ' � , , i�- � �d� rn . � � _�. � � � •` g „ , � _ . _ , _. � , „� _ �_� - ,+tc• � �'�,� � ,.r � ., " � ,- . _ , ,� ,. . �. , _. �.;�.,.,,�, _ � ^r �Grm _ � �,,�' ,� , �, , . . �, .t _ - ' > ,_ _. ., �" ..�' �v°�, .. �= i... -- ,.-,, � .�,. � � � � 7 . . =t !� � ;� I ��, �� a ,�- � I � �� j , � ; � - �� . � _ .. � x , _ —� '��- ��' � ; �� 1��.a� _ - `�� ;�� --- ,�< � . , , �m��.�__u.�.� ,� ---_ _ .��m . - _— : _ . _ ,x—'� , ��South Elevation . - ....�� IIJ N �&i��)wk� 3µ,�':. �� . 9.wa >�'.�,��z,",£ • . . � O I d U ... .. . . .. . . .. . Z � � N a y O � �� N � C � d . ='' r,,,w°��y�,-.."..`°.,". __,_ 3 m i u�'c '' �.-� ._Y...�-�'{F'� ��W a . _ ....._ .o,=,., -- '' ....__ . � �;. . .. _,... s=-.. .,� �. , ��,. . ., � m � A E .. � � , ' .. � � �1 m . , �, � '�� { ....._... � U 1 m U ° ,::� � ; ' : % ' ? � _' ' } �. '1" - � � � # Y' �,g� .,GL2, � . � � ;. �- -'" - _ f i . ; / 1 � .._.__. , � '� � � ""�y � � � � � S� Y � ' — .� � i — . � — _— �° ��,:,'� fi '� � _ _ __. _ .. . . � 4. . .�. - " v a . - • � � 1, � � „ � v » 4 ��_ ._ _ _ . . _ .,> � _ . �.. ..� ?-j ;. _. ,. .� , r -r � : . � � _ -b..' _ : � � k� � ��r.� �, . , _ , " --{��. � s � DEN1202 . 't"T .r. �. 7-' .� r, 7 k ;,3 }�;.�_ _ '6, ,� wu.« n.� � � (� :r'. _`� c ` - � ,. ...... s �fi I�i - - -_s" _,. - x . ,,. , �j� - - - --- _ North&South �r... ---------------------------�- � . ,. . .. _ . _._ ', .. . �.. -.-_._, Elevations � /�1 North Elevatlon .... . . . � �.. ,,,,,E�,� � � '� 2012.04.�0 A-007 ._..----__—. ----.—._._�.... � �� '�"" �.�� ,��°� ,� � � . ��,. �� ..... .... _ � � � � _�� Buiiding Color 1 Building Color 2 Roof:Color 3 Railings:Color 4 BM OC-108 BM 2097-50 Red Tile BM 1613 - , .. Pale Moon Hint of Mauve Silent Night ' � �"� - � - �. MATERIALS LEGEND � ' � `� ' � � q ,..., w ,.».o � . . <. . . . . ..�. i;-.. _.. �., _, i _ . .>�<_ s- . . ».,;.: .. ... _ . �� ,-.-. k-,. F:�.: � .. � _ > �, i- � Red Tile Roof -- ' - _ ^e � � �� . �� ..} � ..�F ._...� . ' - . . � .. .k� o �" ,< ;s�� . . r �/; .�. . . < .... Stucco Trim,Color 2 ' t �� I i f�_ p� � „r� ,_ .._ , ;r ; stucco,ca«z , -, .'� •" -j - - ,as�,. ...�.� �,o, . . �i. ��, ;�: -, >� � � � �� . � � ..�� ,._- w� , . . -1 " ,� .....� � _ _, ,. .,.�. - F �"" Slgnage Location. � • `v Tw��YP°�^°� . ��-.„" . . � ��West Elevation . � ° � q '_. ' '_ - u.�-=e �mv.�v�ru.�cz � m •'.^ ..... �� .:,r�`�'� *romvraom��-,sco i ��.•�-"' ... � '` .�.W,r—,r.,,, �.. , o�ar�ne < .... ,�� .-� �f '" . _, i ( ,. '°. .,'L, .. T � . {° � 'fi/ �`-�'m� � Prefinished metal ! � , -, ,,. � �•. f � � �" " railings typical.White � _�,..._. . ,.. -�..�'� . ,�«sa c,.a.r .. - _,. .,...m -.;�,� � '-- . _—_ ,,,.� -e -,.a,� � ! ' _ -- . _. .. � � �V y q �r,�� stucco body caor z I�� c � ; c. , Y- '�. � � � � .� `Ei � x � ' � a� .:;.t3' �m � �rN�.,c�. " "_ .e.. - � o -, `J . =� � �,��€-,,,, ��'' � ��d a�i � ; tl b �'k j P� ,� �c;: h J. a: ' � tucc0.Cdor 1 . .. � U:m� . .. � ; � :.x � ,,..� .;_. '., .� E � � , " "' � _.. ,... � ' .,�. � N g .. ' Y __.. ° , .�, � 1� �� C ��10 ao _ . ._m..rA " n o ' '.[��'�" , .:. ,� °` Red dle roof � � � �' c r " _ � s � Z wa m �y„ ;K , a p�� . ; `; § p 1`��l� �i . , � "` `#t4� �.. - , . Q� � T� � � .�... .. " � ; «. .� - ,. ��" �."r.�, Stucco Trim.Color 2 =>�.- � U.m U .� - .,...�.. :.,.,_.. �: -. . . - �'� .,�.9s. _ ,° , ....._ � .' � �� , �� , , .. ,,�;�:; �� . - _ Aeu-� ! � _...��v � _ � � �,.�a .,,'//Gi% / /i�r n ,. � �� — � ' s�' s�ucco,caor� - — � � ,�N,b E_ �, _ , . — m � �' — � � � - � — �_- i p- __.�idingBaseCda2 �. y � _� ; i /, ,v �,� _ �. i� JLx� — � r � ,�'� , , i� �^�,<; � ° ,,�• '�r �_ _ �, : .g r r .. . „ . .. ..r � _... , '� � ---� r� _ „� ,..�o..,E�,��m .._ �. , ._ — , . � ._ � t ,. � * , _. �� _ � .� �^��sy--�� ' _ �'� - --' 3":` .s� �`.<`f."� L�1Li.1 " °`� DEN12A2 . T _._ < < � � , _. „ _ , .r .. - —' . r. - - , :�. �. , „�, -.A ,�� t . .�� "�' � " .__..., � �.l _�� ww,me. .. � a ' . ,.� : � �.. . �.�v � - _; " - T �y �� ElevaUOns� „. .;?4�;,, ��: �.: _'_.e.... .... . ... . .. ... N . _„ �. ;. �. - �- r f x � ;; � . �. � _ � s � ��xx�n .. . ,�Ea� 2o�2.oa.�o 3 ENLARGED TYPICAL BUILDING ELEVATION , q�,.N.,�...,. . . .. „ East Elevation �. �,..,e A-008 °CINSfTTIA AVENUE �;��"'� , __ _ � ,Q',... � � • .^`-: .. . ��'. ��,. '' � �~�, �C� �;�' . r ' f �_��e2 � -- .' *, c p� _ .�� > �, ,•� •,. . . . , 1 .. _ —�b o L • Y 1 I . �. . � i � i y� I 1I I/ � I }�� y � •. � � `� I � �._� ti. ¢ ° ° � • I �, �e � � �l� �ra � _` ''- � l ., I /' � o c o ,+' , . .i • � � , . f��..� . t i '( u �'�• � � �`:.,: _ y� I . 1 ,'� o o � '' I I •: � Y � o o c . I �� r , � o o . � — , — n � � •--.�• .,,.� - . r . .. `�-��-f ' �� "�. . �1__. � � � � ; � , _._.__..- , , __- _ .._ 3oaNV�as3 �de � ._-.__ ____-_ _- I , -'.._-._ - .-- _-._-_.. - �y"... ..- .. \ I ' -.-.� M�.11a. aASSOCe�F.lnc. �.�'�� . �A _. _ _........ Kobrrwin z`" DeNunzio Bay Esplanade K«o�«r `��` X : ' n�°m Hotel Project,LLC Grnup,I.LC _ zn�1 .��d,�:az,�n,nkw�ni�e��a a:��,..��-a ' •..• ,: �' �m ctrtxrwa�x-e„a�l �: . . . wscn..e,m�usbo«s:sa - anb�ap�UA111�' �'.�.""s' - m p i o�ae . . .. . , � ,.=aa�: F t ! Tree Inventory 650 Bay Esplanade Clearwater Beach, Florida March 7, 2013 Prepared by: Urban Forestry Solutions, llc Rick Albee, Member For:Randy Austin Landon,Moree&Assoc. Inc 31622 U.S. 19 N. Palm Harbor,Fl 34684 The following report is submitted by Urban Forestry Solutions, llc, and includes findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and my report is factual and unbiased. The following Tree Inventory Report will identify each tree by its size, species and overall condition with accompanying notes justifying the Condition Rating. The Tree Survey indicates the location of the tree on the site by the tree identification number. This tree identification number corresponds to the number on the Tree Inventory Report. Tree Inventory Data A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. Problems not apparent upon visual observations cannot be noted and were not noted. A tree inventory is also a valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and/or removal of trees with problems that could lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The following is an explanation of the data used in the inventory: Tree#- location -Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds with a number on the Tree Survey that identifies the location of the tree in the field. Size—Diameter at breast height(DBH) is the size of the tree's trunk measured at 4.5' above grade. If there is a fork in the trunk at that point,the diameter is measured at the narrowest area below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of clear trunk(C.T.). Species—The first time the tree is listed in the inventory, it is listed by its common and botanical name. For simplicity,the tree is listed by its common name thereafter. Condition Rating — The Condition Rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood and/or split, cracked, or rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments 1 � � (i.e., well-spaced branches vs. several branches emanating &om the same area on the trunk; co- dominant stems vs. single leader trunk;presence of branch collars vs. included bark). T'he overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0-6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as follows: 0-A dead tree 1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease. A tree with a rating of#1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage. 2—A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as: dominant stems with included bark at or near the base; large cavities; large areas of decayed wood; extreme crown dieback; crackedlsplit scaffold branches; etc. Also included is a tree with health issues (low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems). A tree with a rating of#2 should be removed unless the problem(s) can be treated. A tree with a #2 Condition Rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the Condition Rating. 3-A tree with average structure and systemic health, minor crown dieback and problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a co-dominant stem not in the basal area that can be subordinated, cabled and braced or a co-dominant stem that will soon have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of#3 has average appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible. 4-A tree with a rating of#4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees e�chibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of #4 is valuable to the property and should be preserved. 5 — A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should be of a species that possess characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation. 6—A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness. A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the 2 �. i tree. A specimen tree should have an undisturbed growth area equal to its drip line (equal to the branch spread). Only an experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.)Certified Arborist should be allowed to perform maintenance work on a specimen tree. TREE INVENTORY REPORT Please note: Trees are living organisms, and with all living organisms, certain degrees of stress may be experienced when they are disturbed in any way. It must be pointed out that it is not humanly possible to entirely ascertain the full extent of stress that the tree may experience. Nor is it possible to assure with 100% probability that the trees will survive. However, with professional arboricultural consulting, it is hoped that the stress factors can be held to a minimum and that the trees will continue to thrive during and following construction. Tree # Size Species Rating 1 14' CT sabel palm (Saba/palmetto) 4.0 2 12' CT queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana) 2.0 3 15' CT sabel palm 3.0 4 15' CT sable palm 4.0 5 15' CT sable palm 3.0 6 20' CT sable palm 3.0 7 16" Norfolk Island pine (Araucaria heterophylla} 1.0 8 7' CT sable palm 4.0 9 27' CT sable palm 2,0 Comment: Basel decay. 10 18' CT sable palm 2,p 11 16' CT sable palm 4.0 12 17' CT sable palm 4.0 13 15' CT sable palm 4.0 14 6' CT sable palm 1.0 15 12' CT queen palm 2.0 3 � , 16 15' CT sable palm 4.0 17 17' CT sable palm 4.0 18 5' CT sable palm 4.0 19 5' CT sable palm 3.0 20 10' CT sable palm 4.0 21 10' CT sable palm 4.0 22 10' CT sable palm 4.0 23 9", 13" Norfolk Island pine 1.0 Comment: Co-dominant trunk with included bark. 24 14' CT sable palm 4.5 25 20' CT sable palm 4.5 26 18' CT sable palm 4.0 27 15" Australian pine (Casuarina ssp) 1.0 Comment: On the Florida EPPC's Invasive Plant Species List 28 18' CT sable palm 4.5 29 27" rubber tree (Ficus elastica) 2.0 30 19' CT sable palm 3.0 31 10" Australian pine 1.0 32 6" Australian pine 1.0 33 8" Australian pine 1.0 34 8" Australian pine 1.0 35 5" Australian pine 1.0 36 5" Australian pine 1.0 37 4" Australian pine 1.0 4 � t 38 6" Australian pine 1.0 39 7" Australian pine 1.0 40 10" Australian pine 1.0 41 10" Australian pine 1.0 42 13' CT sable palm 3.0 43 20" Australian pine 1.0 44 18", quad Australian pine 1.0 45 12" Australian pine 1.0 46 7' sable palm 3.0 47 10", twin Australian pine 1.0 48 9",twin Australian pine 1.0 49 16" Australian pine 1.0 50 11", twin Australian pine 1.0 51 14"tri Australian pine 1.0 52 10" Australian pine 1.0 53 12"twin Australian pine 1.0 54 17" Australian pine 1.0 55 7' sable palm 4.0 56 14" laurel oak(Quercus laurifolia) 2.0 Comment: Co-dominant trunk with included bark. Moderate die-back, low energy tree. 57 4", 6", 9" Norfolk Island pine 1.0 58 18" carrotwood (Cupania anacardioide) 1.0 Comment: On the Florida EPPC's Invasive Plant Species List 59 20" live oak(Quercus virginiana) 4.0 5 60 18' CT sable palm 4.0 61 11' CT sable palm 4.0 62 7' CT queen palm 0.0 63 14' CT sable palm 4.0 64 5' CT sable palm 4.0 65 13' CT sable palm 4.0 66 8' CT sable palm 4.0 67 6' CT sable palm 4.0 68 10' CT sable palm 2.p 6 . . , � � U �� 9 � y N �� m � �� w� � �W �� >�a°� �, a� LEGEND �F°a°'�g`� � �p y m�g LL I �- 'G�F 1V iEDFSGL � m o 3 z C ��` -flflM1NM i$��e a 2 az .,�-��11hN�E7 w � � �� -P�IRIQE o�v° � I •-POlA PQF w m 0 A � N-RBO/�ED w7FR IE1ER � ��'IE�/�ED NAt 1GLYE ....-SW VRY SElR YANqE y o-yp� .: �� Z I I � ' � �-t1Ei10E PFffSfAL ' � Ppprox.Tree Ganopy-Typ. � I I p � I I Y-�FAmI PE',�$fIL '. I I �s I JI—{I I - - _ — I d wa '1�1II Palm y 1 _____��-._OM1�4pf�ip� a � F-yI— I � w � � I L __ 5�' 'LLG GlS UE I�� ... � .� I TaMS "=` . .. F'.�v� �� O �� .v _ � — — — _ — s��g � —— __ _— __ �K 1 I N _LL6 SNRNtY g�R IlE 'IB �abal Palm r � ----�-U.6 SION SEER UE L__—__—_ I� s�. �¢ * ir� Ciueen Palm I I -O 1 U.0 SNfGRI'g!R UE P8t URIIY YAP � 22 19 •�r scbal Palm � : 1 5tlaal Pdl9n 6 5abal Palm =,pypl Palm 21 . e,�yal Pa m0 � �O �1� y � � 'U.0 M1FR UE PFR UL1Y�MP � I� � �8 Q� 5abal Palm 5abal Palm 2 I I p r�-�iRMWI q[ �� • • •• +r� �1 I m �o-BNryNI �I 23 24 �'� Sabal Palm 14 5 O3 1 '', I 1 r�-NOFOIK PIE ��... I �� Sabal Palm � ....,1 I �e-ON( � �� H Norfolk laland Plne •� Eipb�pl Palm ��1 I PNL �7 Sobol Palm � I�- �I 5daol Palm S- -`+�I Palm 27 q�tralim Pins ��-I 1 i 1 �'� �I�� Sabal Palm 25 i� 4 � ��I I I '�� r 26 '�I i � � �, i i � rO 67 2H K� sabal Palm �� I I �I �� \ � U � �� Sabal Palm � ,, '.I 1 �I 1 L=i 1� 1 N J N N ;I 29ro 30 N �'II �I 1� C J °�o° I� �id�al Palm 3531��(`-��I Palm I : ��`I 1 �I ti� � ;�� I 65 OSobol Palm � 3 36 \#� ��32 'I I I �� Q�'j o 0 l � � Is fA a p �� x r � '�� F�g 41��r�r"r�33 � .._ ..,1 I 11 i � W .� a� f ■■ 5¢pa�Potrr� u� 63 s s /3837�Sabal Palm 1 . �I j I�j I' I �°M"" m a V ci �I Auetrallm Pine 6raupingJ 42 :xbal Palm I 1 1 y � I� 9abal Palm II �I 1 ¢ �� .�4� o� 13 I I �� s , _� �I raue✓ Z� �I � � ,r 5 SaUOI Palm I I �I 1 @ � p Sabal Palm Sobol Palm �� .. ¢� I I PueLrallvi Pira 6roupi�g �s � I I s Z v. �p r• g sata�Pqy� �� ¢�`' �� I i�'.�47 5 �� 1 �~-- ¢ j I �. 1 48 �7 �//�� II 1 vWiw I� � � -'11 5atrairaim �' --T R ' .{4� . I�� Z I (Ueen Palm 52 M,. 0�49 �� 9 m _ � d —� I Australian Pin�6rouping 5 I ,.oYK '� �� i r�� I x� w�.�'� �0 ._. _ . ..��r �ial Palm s M�. � 11 .._ 1 �� o° = i� 6 2 S a b a l Pa l m �a u r e i o a k � w s� s�ai Pai __-�---- ---- ------ %i _ ��-___ -� t l, " i i ��5� ss --- ---- ---- ----- a�� i �� mjZ o `i� -- ---- ----- i O _ --- --- _—__ — ---- �� I ir� C� � Sabal Palm��.�;—� �� / � i� ' ito§s / ...�� /// / I I I� :xbal Palm � ��/ Norlolk I�land Rro � �� / �� /� / I �aarnmatt-sn I MP''�x.Tree Garopy'T�p. i i I v. so 57 ./ BAY ESPLANADE ,�ox.T��c��y-.yp. ,;�� i i �� , I r.�j _. -. . . ._ _ . .. �� 58 / � � ff° � I� / � ii' //MOrrolk�elvei Flro .. " i i Llve Oak � �� Existing Tree Inventory Lec�end ii �* : �I $9 �� Gcrro!wood � i� �%' �Existing Tree per Survey �I� -i i ��a rc i <<' �—Tree Number, Correspord to Report \\ o. �.. - iii -26 � � �*��i� �Tree Species �► Sabal Palm EXISTING TREE PROT CTION GENERAL NOTES � � � EXISTING TREES AND PALMS WITNIN AND ADJACENT TO THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND SPECIFiED TO REMAIN � � m� ARE TO BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUC?ION PROCESS WITH TREE BARRICADES PER THE CITY OF � m�� CLEARWATER REQUIREMENTS OR MORE STRINGENT PER THESE PLANS. O o Q �� THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN WTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORIST (ISA) CERTIFIED ARBORIST WITH A � MINIMUM OF 5 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH SIMILAR PROJECTS, TO DIRECT APPROPRIATE PRUNING (ROOTS, BRANCHES) AND/OR OTHER TREATMENT NECESSARY TO ENSURE THE HEALTH, VIABILITY AND ATTRACTIVENESS OF € TREES TO REMAIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMP�EMENTATfON OF THE CERTIFIED * ARBORIST'S INSTRUCTIONS. PRUNING SHALL CONFORM TO ANSI A-300 PRUNING STANCARDS WITH FINAL SPECIFICAT�ONS TO BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. EXISTING , ALL TREE ROOTS EXISTING WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREAS AND ORIGINATING FROM A PROTECTED TREE, SHALL BE TREE SEVERED CLEAN AT THE LIMITS OF THE PRESERVED AREA WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ROOT PRUNING INVENTORY SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MECHANICAL TRENCHER WITH SHARP BLADES AND UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION �e�� OF THE CERTIFIED ARBORIST. ROOT PRUNING SHALL MEET THE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF oa� CLEARWA?ER AND ISA. NpRTM o3/i i/is � ET1 t � DeNunzio Hotel City of Clearwater, Florida January 2013 Revised April 2013 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Prepared for: Bay Esplanade Project L.L.C. 305 Cambridge Street, Suite 3 Cambridge, MA 02141 Ph. (617) 945-2555 Prepared by: ■■■■ ��■ ��■ ■■�■ Landon, Moree � Associates, Inc. Civil 8 Environmental Engineers Planners-Surveyors 31622 U.S. Highway 19 North Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 (727) 789-5010 F.E.B. No. EB-0004096 LMA JOB#651-01 DeNunzio Hotel Water Quality Volume/Stage Summary ELEV. AREA CUMUL. CONTRIBUTING AREA(1/2" RUNOFF) O.U� VOLUME CONTRIBUTING OFF-SITE AREA (acre) 0.00 (ft) (Acres) (ac-ft) (RUNOFF FROM 1" RAINFALL) 4 50 0 042 0.000 WATER QUALITY 5 50 0 042 0.042 VOLUME (ac-ft) t?.0-�0 6 50 0.042 0.084 7.50 0.042 0.126 WATER QUALITY 8 50 0 042 0.168 ELEVATION (ft) 5.44 9.50 0.042 0.210 10.00 0.042 0.231 Stage vs. Storage 10.00 ____..----- _ __ _ _ _. I ____.._.___ 9.00 8.00 — 7.00 � 6.00 —�—Stage vs.Storage � 5.00 Treatment Volume N 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 Storage(ac-ft) Drainage Calcs2 I � . DeNunzio Hotel DRAWDOWN WORKSHEET FOR UNDERDRAIN WATER QUALITY ELEVATION = 5.44 FT NAVD BOTTOM OF POND ELEVATION = 4.50 FT NAVD WATER VOL AT QUALITY ELEV = 1725 CF UNDERDRAIN CENTERLINE ELEV = 3.75 FT NAVD TOTAL HEAD = 1.69 FT INCREMENTAL HEAD STEP = 0.1 FT #STEPS TO BOP = 9.4 STEPS #STEPS TO ZERO HEAD = � 16 STEPS INCREMENTAL VOL = 184 CF FLOW LENGTH THROUGH FILTER MEDIA = 2 FT HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY(K) = 5 FT/HR UNIT PIPE LENGTH(L) = 1 FT ACTUAL PIPE LENGTH = 25.0 FEET ACTUAL DRAWDOWN TIME = 19.1 HOURS (Actual length*Actual Ume)_(Unit length*Time for unit length) Note:For detention with effluent filtration system, detention volume must be available again within 24 hours. � �: ..1� iMJ,i ��j, '��'�+ �y�"'R�� c a ^� ��7' � �u �h '� °A ;�� 0 <4 r�yi' �;� i�. ��"+� i �Mlw� Te4i �r +� +�°� �k��fi �"# c '� � � � �"��,�G � � '�p'�� T�1i : ,�,_ IW �IW �: � 'i�INwr��, c� � �. t ��i ��? �.�+ ��.�� 5.M0 1.890 1 .0 2.00 0.845 31.3 132.03 0. 0.100 183.5 128.13 1.4 5.310 1.590 1541.5 2.00 0.795 J1.3 121.22 1.4 0.100 183.5 120.31 1.5 5.240 7.�90 1358.0 2.00 0.7�3 31.3 116.41 3. 0.f00 183.5 112.50 1.8 5.f40 1.390 117�.5 2.00 0.895 31.3 108.SY 4.6 0.100 183.5 104.89 1.8 5.040 1290 991.0 2.00 O.BtS 31.3 f00.78 6.3 0.100 183.5 96.88 1.9 l.910 1.190 807.{ 2.00 0.595 31.3 92.97 8. 0.700 tE3.5 89.08 2.1 ♦.610 1.090 .9 2.00 0.5{S 31.3 85.18 10.3 0.100 163.5 81.25 2.3 4.7M 0.080 N0.! 2.00 0.{9S 31.3 77.74 12.8 0.100 183.5 73.�4 2.5 4.6{0 O.B90 256.9 2.00 O.NS 31.3 �.53 15.1 0.f00 183.5 85.83 2.8 {.540 0.790 73.4 2.00 0.195 31.3 81.72 17.9 O.WO 73.{ 80.16 1.2 4.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.39 19.1 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 4.soo 0.7 0.0 2.00 0.375 37.3 58.59 19.1 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 4.300 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 SB.SB 18.1 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 �.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 19.1 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 1.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 19.1 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 I.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.9 19.1 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 /.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 19.1 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 4.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 19.1 0.000 0.0 SB.59 0.0 4.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 1g.1 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 l.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 i9.1 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 1.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 1g.1 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 4.500 0.750 0.0 2,00 0.375 31.3 58.59 ig.t 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 l.500 0.750 0.0 2.00 0.375 31.3 58.59 19.1 0.000 0.0 58.59 0.0 �� 4�� 0.0 Z,00 0.375 31.3 58.59 19.1 UnQdm DeNunzio Hotel RATIONAL METHOD *50 year storm event `zone 6 Overland Flow = 60 minutes Curb Flow = 0 minutes Time of Concentration= 60 minutes PREDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS Historical Peak Disharge-------->Q =C* I *A WEIGHTED"C" FACTOR= 0.22 INTENSITY(in/hr) = 4.1 in/hr AREA(acres) = 0.95 acres 0.86 cfs PROPOSED CONDITIONS "C"factor Impervious = 0.63 acres * 0.95 = 0.599 Rock = 0.00 acres " 0.65 = 0.000 Pond = 0.04 acres " 1.00 = 0.040 Open Space = 0.28 acres * 0.22 = 0.062 0.95 acres WEIGHTED"C"= 0.737 PEAK STORM RELEASE RAINFALL INTENSITY FLOW RUNOFF FLOW REQUIRED DURATION I Q=CIA VOLUME VOLUME STORAGE min sec in\hr cfs c c c ac ft 60 3600 4.1 2.89 10406 3106 7299 0.168 <- Drainage Calcs2 DeNunzio Hotel '� Volume/Stage Summary � � ELEV. AREA CUMUL. CONTRIBUTING AREA 0.95 VOLUME OFF-SITE CONTRIBUTING AREA (acre) O.UO ' (ft) (Acres) (ac-ft) 4.50 0 042 0.000 50 YR VOLUME PLUS 5.50 0.042 0.042 WATER QUALITY VOLUME (ac-ft) 0,207 6.50 0.042 0.084 7.50 0.042 0.126 50 YR 8.50 0.042 0.168 POND (ft) 9.43 9.50 0.042 0.210 ELEVATION 10.00 0.042 0.231 Stage vs. Storage 12.00 _ . _ __ .._ _ , 10.00 —�— � � 8.00 � d 6.00 — --- -- a� `.S i N 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 Storage(ac-ft) , , , . Orifice Calculations VERTICAL CIRCULAR ORIFICE FLOW Q=C a(2 g h)� Diameter(d)= 4.09 Inches Orifice Area(a)= 0.0914 Sq.Ft. h C Value= 0.60 Coefficient of discharge �____ �d � ORIFICE FLOW AT DHW Orifice DHW Orific�e Head Q Ft. Centerline Ft. s rt 2 h 0.86 9.43 5.61 3.82 15.68 f 1 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. ��;;::;;;;;::, Land Development Consulting Engineedng.Ptanning.Txansportat�on.Per�nitting ICOT Center 13825 ICOT BoulevaM,8uite 805 �=��- ~ ��a> Claarwater,FL 33780 :-:s:.:M.�::..; �' Phone:(727)524-1818 ' Fax:(727)524-8090 January 28, 2013 Mr. Randy Austin Landon,Moree&Associates,Inc. 31622 US Highway 19 North Palm Harbor,FI 34684 Re; Bay Esplanade Hotei—Traffic Impact Study Dear Randy: Please find enclosed three (3) signed copies of the Traffic Impact Study fax the above- referenced property. This study concludes the surrounding roadways and intersections presently operate at acceptable Ievels of service and would continue to do so with the propased redevelopment. Please submit three (3} copies with your plans package to the City of Clearwater. Sincerely, Robert Pergolizzi,AICP/PTP Principal Cc: 13-QOS � r TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR BAY ESPLANADE HOTEL #650 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA I PREPARED FOR: BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT, LLC PREPARED BY; GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. JANUARY 2013 PROJECT# 13-005 Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, PTP AICP#9023,PTP#133 • � r I. INTRODUCTION The 1,02 acre project site is located alon� the Bay Esplanade on the east side of Poinsettia Avenue in north Clearwater Beach(See Figure 1). The site is proposed to be developed as a mid-price hotel conta.ining 102 rooms. The development of the property is the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment. This application requires an assessment af the traffic impacts of development. Prior to completing this anaIysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. II. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The property has frontage on Bay Esplanade and Poinsettia Ave��ue which are two-lane local roads. Mandalay Avenue is a four-lane divided collector roadway between the roundabout and Bay Esplanade, and a two-lane collector no�th of Bay Esplanade. Roya1 Way is a two-lane local road that intersects with Mandalay � Avenue and provides access to the area of the proposed hotel. As agreed to by Clearwater staff, tra£�c counts were conducted between 4 - 6 PM on in January 2013 at tlie following intersections: Mandalay Avenue/Bay Esplanade(signal) Maiidalay Avenue/Royal Way All traffic counts were converted to annual average equivalents using FDOT seasonal adjusttnent factors. Existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2, Existing intersections were analyzed using the HCS 2010 software. The HCS 2010 printouts are included in Appeiidix A. Presently the signalized intersection at Mandalay Aveiiue / Bay Esplanade operates at LOS A with average delay of 7.2 seconds per vehicle during the PM peak hour. At the Mandalay Avenue/Royal Way intersection southbound left tut�s operate at LOS A with average delay of 7.8 seconds and the westbound approach (Royal Way} operates at LOS B with 11.9 seconds average delay. Traffic volume on i Royal Way is extremely low. Mandalay Avenue south of Bay Esplanade is a four-lane divided collector � roadway and according to FDOT 2012 OLOS Handbook capacity tables has a LQS D capacity of 2,630 vehicles per hour. The segment of Mandalay Avenue � north of Bay Esplanade is a two-lane undivided collector roadway with a LOS D capacity of 1,200 vehicles per hoi.u. Exis�ing roadway conditions are shown below. 1 I � 4,�yY �. .yi� � ..t l� _ V♦ �t 4M .��6 Y.�] ��? 1� � �t ��r ,�`� d �y ~��'��1'E,i i.`..� r�, �4��";1 � �'� �F� .9��,��,a�r; �—c� i�ai �.�z T , i�;7�. �k� ��r �,4 ,`9_C"P'" ��A'`��t'Si�� +�""�"Y� ��k'�'�. vf., :�:; { . `c.'F��". 1�r ��; 111,1� ' =l�.��l,��`1��. 1}."� ;��r rs� i ti '�" �- � ' �� ;:r;� -''� �� , ��. , ;��!x;� ��D� �. ; S� µ,�j. r �z ��, r t'�,`�'� ��:. ��'��' ; y�1 '° •��-, !� �' ��; 'rt i x � �,-�;� � �� `�1� k- f +� ��+1`� ��` �, � �d��y ` . ` r , ; 1�"r�. r: .- { � �I i. ` ��i�� 7-u /imifi,r ��wo�'.�� .�.�, � p , �y�� j � ��[��t I ' �t � �,\'�� ;.�5. I� 1�,�� i,`r.,�� w� "�R ! 4.� � '�C��'��E t �;: , �'�! r �� F i,�� , r .. w � ��' e �' ,� � �� ■{�i��@gJ�,��if�l� � � i.i� Y� i�� -1� ,,11�,+ �' �i :� �j'�'+iV^q�e� ��I' �� n7 i�� . .t «5��. �F 4 d. �, �'k�� [,., �11 :� �;_—� {�I}�Y.". t ��1.� �� .r'�i- �9• t ! iF `� +'`.' yyy�'��t� �� 1' (�t '� �r 4 5p�� "�!�`�. � . � ��y�, 3 �?�� nA jlt'�',.A {i' � �� ,.'t � ' � 1- r fY n 'f'r _ �,��i li �7.y,3�1� � �.,f' ,� r�' ��E�} I�,, rnw� � ��st 6 � r ` � (��`.c.�� i � �;- ..,�+y fy' 4�� ?�I�.■�� \��y,+��. �i �,�� F �� .. �"p ..�]�-.�; � � � ��t� � '° � f ,�f �_��- �� .;�!��y� ��.� . ;��,+I �� i f�� • , , �'4 � `iiii��ib7tlN�i`�,�i7I ��p�r��,`� '�9L . ti , 1�...,i 4�� Q�" 1�� eS; � ��( �l� I�+ 1 � t. �9! .J,� �� .�y. I I-:�i/ ._,�x4.�� ?'t ` �7 •..` �IJ 3�. .,� � � '�.. ��`: i �q�j. s �i _ }'� .i y�r�''nT. f�_ �'{�'il ,..,�..'�. ''t'�`��I�`�i�"��5�. i� i_ �iS�� {� 3 � ��i' ��. �`: �!��r�f��.�::�li�'� �.�3 y S .� �\,�S S � �.f ; i ��I�t<� � '�l�':Attr� �.,' _ [;. � E j �� '��' ., '�� ]t, `��,`' �� A , �y �f'`? �� rY �.�' ��n`E�.� �-"r. �-� • - f+ �� ' '� ��'� r ;� �'�>: , t�� , "�:: � r '�•`� ' � , � � r `' ') -- . �, , ,. �i � �q ]f �� r � �� j ,�� t;�,�,-- � �,� � �'� a� t ��F � -3� �_�i . � ! `` �� 43�_Ytf�F � i d ;� 1�� •� l e, l � ,'�1 ,;� � >. � �� '�� .��1 ..��,i1'. � �I ' � �.. �� "�'�.�� , '�.�. �I� -�°; i,. �s S � ��'- , �'`. ��, �, �' +"��' ��'i - � ; : �� I�f��i �G .� � � a:�� t' � . l�i�:'�i��1� �i � j ��' �, c j �' ` �:> =w�wai; kl'i� 6:J's:�� ` ; �-�y`�� ' 'p�'�1 '� r ��i i ti'� �` . ��'? �,�:r�y'A��\��;k� r_�• `.. � �'° �; , �:� '� �,��r� , ;,.- ,� r- r r � ' � i � ��7� ' � Es �:. i� �`�� , ,� V` �a, �� Q\\ � �,��, � r:�� '� ��';- � ��:.5 �� -�� "" ``"r' '��..�"; .ti}':�clr 1L.� .��. k V., _na,t>+._,. � t . �4� 7 k;.- �.. ��` "�"'' . . ��:,{�y;�M"�3.. j � • ' � d �-'f� L �'Y�� f�� '� :��.. � �"ti "',.� ��. I ��'£ �' '�� `�n; �� 1��_ ',��i' 1 i I t ��fi; y �' ��, i�� 1 ,6rz„�%' � - - Ip,,, � -� I, F.`'" ��#T,,�Y J,�'',I�1��--.�, � r �� 1 . r,.� I � ;` -':�=-*=:�=" � � �r- "��'�` '��,�, �!i�I '�� F �jj11l��Mr�"i.'�r:,i�, � `� (';f tl.}� ��, t� F.b. � I. d ° �� . �� .._ oy �,,� �r�t ii�;� ��.j� V ��-�}--t'� � J� `� '� E . il\ C �°`�'a�� f ti , � d�7�� IrI:�Mi'��°i�•t�-'�� 'A��j�'��.?�,�,6 �?S �7 I i '� • ■ . � 1 � � : ' ' ' ` � � � 1 � s • . � • � �- • •� � � � � - � . N �� i N n a N 17 N .- Q } � ��Rova� war fr n ca a �- a � a O � � z d � � � M � N� N � � «� � I �t �4 rr N� .f—} ; �? �J T � �26 31 ; � BAY ESPLANADE_ � � 6 � --� t r 32 � 30� � N `r z � S i � I � �T M� � � � C r .� Q� 7 I � PROJEC'f NO: � EXISTIIVG PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (2013) 13-005 a = Gulf Coast Consulting, YriC, DATl:: FIGUItE; � �y.�'` 1 2013 a Land Development Consulting � � � �. � � ';�. DRAWN BY: Z VT � EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS -2013 Roadway Se ent nes PM Volunle PM LOS Mandalay Ave(S.of Bay Esplanade) 4LU 638 C Mandalay Ave.(Bay Esplanade—Royal) 2LU S 18 C Mandaley(N of Royal) 2LU 461 C As shown above all roadway seginents aud intersectioiis operate at LOS C during PM peak hour. III. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing traf�c was adjusted to include expected traffic from the approved Frenchy's Restaurant and traffic from the approved Marriott East Stzore Hotel. Using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 9�' Edition rates,the amount of new trips was calculated and estimates are shown below: TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Land Use TTE LUC Amount Dailv Mid-Day PM Peak Hotel 312 102 rooms 833 62(31/31) 61 (31/30) The expected distribution of vehicular trips is as follows: 10%to/from the north 90%to/from the south PROJECT IMPACT CALCULATIONS (PM PEAK HOUR) Proj ect Road Segment Lanes Project Trins Canacitv Percent Mandalay Ave.(S—Bay Esplanade 4LU 55 2630 2,09% Mandalay Ave{Bay Esplanade—Royal) 2LU SS 1200 2,09% Mandalay Ave(N.of Royal Way) 2LU 6 1200 0.5% ; i i Background trafFic and project tra£fic were added to determine total traffic for 2015 and the intersections and roadway segrnents were xeanalyzed. The future � traffic volumes are sl�own in Figure 3, and the HCS 2010 prii�touts are included in Appendix B. Under future conditions the signalized intersection at Mat�dalay Avenue / Bay Esplanade would operate at LOS A with average delay of 7.0 seconds per vehicle during tlie PM peak hour. 2 61 PM PEAK NOUR TRIPS (31 IN / 30 a�T, N �� N� N� �, �`� W cv a 3 1 � �2ROYAL WAY fl N V aN Q � � � Z � � � I N � W � � N � � "� 4 m ., � N ¢ � M f�`/ � -•---� � � 1 � �2b 31 �, BAY ESPI�AMADE � s� —� r r 3? z � � � � Q30 � � � a � � � I � �� 1 $ � r I � M �I � M . � � � � � E � � PROJECT NO: ' � FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (2015) 13-405 = Gu1f Coast Consultin , Inc. DATE: EIGU1tE: � �::��.. g � � � " Land Development Consulting 1/2 013 B A+ G� DRAWN BY: � W .::;; VT � > At the Mandalay Avenue / Royal Way intersection southbound left turns would operate at LOS A with average delay of 7.9 seconds and the westbound approach (Royal Way)operates at LOS B with 12.5 seconds average delay. At the project driveway all movements would operate at LOS A with minimal delay. FUTURE ROADWAY CONDITIONS -2015 Roadway Se ent Lanes PM Voluine PM LOS Mandatay Ave(S.of Bay Esplanade) 4LU 704 C Mandalay Ave.{Bay Esptanade—Royal) 2LU 584 C Mandalay(N of Royal} 2LU 478 C As shown above �ll roadway seginents and intersections would continue to operate at LOS C during the PM peak hour, IV. CONCLUSIQN This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Cleaiwater staff. This analysis demonstrates tzaffic operations at nearby intersections and on adjacent roadways would eontinue at acceptable levels of service with the proposed hotel during the PM peak hour, I i � i � �. � 1 i . 3 APPENDIX A Robert Pergolizzi From: Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater,com 5en� Tuesday,January 22, 20131:29 PM To: Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com; Robert Pergolizzi Subject: RE: Bay Esplanade Hotel Robert- The methodology is accepted. Please proceed with the TIS. Thanks Be�t�aett Elbo Engineering Specialist Traffic Engineerdng 727-562-4775 phone 727-562-4755 fax Bemiett.Elbona_,myclearwater.com __.___..�_.....__._.__...�_._.___._.._....._......._....._...._.........._.._..._.............._....._....._.........................................._...._... From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Wednesday,]anuary 16, 2013 5:04 PM To: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FW; Bay Esplanade Hotel Ben,take a look at this when I'm gone and give Robert a call to discuss.Thanks ..._.. _..._...._._-.............-----...._.............................._.........._...._._............._.................._...........__...._...__.__ From: Robert Pergolizzi [mailto:pergoCa@guifcoastconsuitinginc.com] Sent:Wednesday,January 16, 2013 4:03 PM To: Patni, Himanshu Subject: Bay Esplanade Hotel Himanshu—Happy New Year! I will be doing a Traffic Analysis for a proposed 102 room hotel on Bay Esplanade in north Clearwater Beach.7he sifie is off of Royal Way. I propose to conduct PM peak period(4-6 PM}traffic counts at the following locations: Mandalay Ave/Bay Esplanade (signal) Mandalay Ave/Royal Way{stop) These intersections and Mandalay Avenue(Bay Esplanade to north)would be analyzed for existing conditions. Background traffic conditions will include the potentlaf trafflc from the Marriott Courtyard hotel on East Shore and the Frenchy's on East Shore both of which are approved projects that I completed the Traffic Studies for. ITE Trip Genaration,9`h Edition shows this new 102 room hotel as generating 833 daily trips and 60 PM pea[c hour trips.This will be added to accumulated background traffic to estimate tota)traffic with the project. Future conditions for the intersections and Mandalay Avenue will be anaEyzed.A written TIS Report will be submitted with the appfication. Please let me know if there is anything else you need. 1 PEAK HOUR f P.H.F.DATA PROJECT: BAY ESPLANADE HOTEL PROJE NO: 13-005 • LOCATI N: Mandalay Ave(N-S) & Bay Esplana�(E-1N� DATE: January 23,2013 LANE TYPE: SPEED LIMIT_ SIGNAL TIMING: ,� G Lf R (SECONDS) (E-W greert oen demdnd only) NB 4 Lane NB NJA NB SB 2 Lane 5B WA SB EB 2 Lane EB N/A EB YVB 2 Lane WB WA WB PM PEAK HOUR COtlNTS TIME NB NB NB SB SB SH ES EB EB WB WB NB TOTAL HOURIY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 4:00-4:15 �87 4:154:30 '129 4:30-4_45 169 4:45-5:00 166 657 S:Oo-5:15 161 625 5:15-5:3Q '175 671 530-5:45 'I53 655 HOURLY FLOW DIAGRAM 5:45-6:Q0 161 650 235 288 94 542 63 3 443 21 9 3 58 52 B 7 5.301 � * I PEAK HOUR T1ME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB ES WB WB WB TOTAL 13 22'1 � PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME � I I Ly 4:34-4:45 9_ „ 3' - 169 74 �— 6 —a L 4 s--31 4:45-5:00 �� 5' �;��,� 186 2 —�-► � 1 5:00-5:15 761 38 —� 30 —� � 26 � 32 5:155:30- p 0 -- -� _� _._.__ 175 � * �-+ � I 60 278 29 1 221 13 6 2 30 26 9 4 671 60 278 29 i t INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 4:30-530 INTERSECTION PHF 0.96 277 367 lNTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOtUME 671 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 367 PHF NB 0.95 PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 235 PHF SB 0.90 C' _ � n, �� PEAK HOUR VOLUME ES 38 PHF EB 0.79 '�l` • ' ' PEAK HOl1R VOLUME WB 37 PHF WB 0.78 �� L�" � � � � �� - -� .s...,.. r � �_ Z�` J� �I � � f :�r� �J —-�:— PEAK HOUR i P.H.F.DATA PROJECT: BAY ESPL.ANADE HOTEL PROJEC�T NO: '13-0OS " LOCATIpN: AGdndal8y Ave{N-5) g Royal Way(E-11V) DATE: January 24,2013 LANE 7YPE: SPEED LIMIT: SIGNAL TIMlNG: A G Y R (SECONOS) (NOT APPUCABLE) NB 2 Lane NB N/A NB SB 2 Larte SB IWA SB EB 2 Lane EB N!A EB WB 2 Lane WB N/A WB PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TIME NB NB NB SB SB 5B EB EB EB W$ WB WB TOTAL HOURLY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 4:00-4:�5 -- -- 'I 30 4:15-4:30 1Q5 4:30-4:45 �32 4:45-5:00 115 482 5:00-5:15 91 443 5:15-530 100 438 5:30-5:45 92 398 HOUR FLOW DIAGRAM 5:45-6:00 143 426 - --- -- ---- --- ----- -- ---- 216 20.9 0 488 32 2 385 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 908 1 * I PEAK Hpl1R SIME NB NB NS SB SB SB EB EB ES W6 W6 WB TOTAL 0 215 'I PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME I I I f._I i L� 4:00-4:15 13Q 0 �— Q � � 0 «--1 4:154:30 105 0 —► �— 0 4:30-4:45 132 U---► 0 --�, .� 1 —� 17 4:45-5:00 ---- -- --- ---- ---- -- --- --- --- ---- --- .115 � � � 0 249 16 'I 215 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 482 O 249 16 i � INTERSECTION PEqK HOUR 4:00-5:00 INTERSECTION PHF 0_91 276 265 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 482 PE/UC HOUR VOLUME NB 265 PHF NB O.S7 � PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 216 PHF SB 0.93 ^� r. — = PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 0 PHF EB #DIV/0! �� :�y PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 1 PHF WB 025 � L� � � � � j i ?�'; #`� 2011 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALL _ Categoxy: 150D PINELLAS COIINTYwIDE MQCF: 0.92 ' Week Dates S£ PSCF _ --- - -----------_ ---�-s�= 1 O1/O1/2011 - O1/O1/2017. 1.06 1.15 2 Q1/02/2011 - 01/08/2011 1.05 1.14 3 O1/09/2011 - 01/15/2011 1.04 1_12 4 O1/16/2011 - O1/22/2011 1.0 1.09 5 01/23/2011 - O1/29/2011 .99 1_07 6 O1/30/2011 - U2/OS/2011 Q. 1.05 * 7 02/06/2011 - 02/12/2011 0.95 1_03 * B 02/13Jz011 - 02/19/2011 0.93 1.01 * 9 02/20/2011 - 02/26/2011 0.92 1.00 *10 02/27/2011 - 03/OS/2�11 0.91 0.98 *11 03/06/2011 - 03/22/2Q11 0.30 0_97 *12 03/13/2011 - 03/I9/2Q11 0.90 0.97 *13 03/20/20I1 - 03/26/2011 0.90 0.9� *14 03/27/20I1 - 04/02/2011 0_91 0.98 *15 04/03/2011 - 04/09/2011 0.92 1.00 *16 04/10/2011 - 04/16/207.I 0.93 1.01 *17 04/17/2011 - 04/23/2U11 0.94 1_02 • *18 04/24/2011 - 04/30/2011 0.95 1_03 *19 OS/tll/20I1 - OS/07l201i 0.96 1.04 „ 20 OS/08/2011 - 05/14/2011 0.97 I._05 21 OS/15/20I1 - OS/22/2011 0.99 1.07 22 .OS/22/20I1 - OS/2B/2011 0.99 Z.07 23 OS/29/2011 - 06/04/2011 0_99 1.07 24 06/OS/2011 - 06/li/2011 1.00 2.08 25 06/12/2011 - 06/18/2011 7._00 I.08 26 06/19/2D11 - 06/25/2011 J._03. 1.09 , 27 06/26/2011 - 07/02/2011 1.01 1.09 28 Q7/03/2011 - 0�/09/2011 1.01 1.09 29 07/10/201i - 07/36/2011 1.02 1.10 30 67/7.7/2011 - 07/23/2011 1.03 1.11 31 07/24/2017. - 07/30/2011 1.03 1.I1 . 32 O7/31/2011 - 08/06/2011 1-04 1.I2 33 08/07/2011 - 08/13/2011 1.05 1.14 34 Q8/14/2011 - 08/20/2011 1.06 1.15 35 08/21/2011 - 08/27/2Q11 1.06 1.15 � 36 OB/28/2011 - 09/03/2011 1.fl7 1.16 37 09/09/2011 - 09/10/2011 1.07 1.16 • ' 38 09/I1/2011 - 09/17/2011 1.06 1.17 39 09/18/2011 - 09/29/2011 1.07 1.16 40 09/25/ZO11 - 10/07./2011 1_06 1.7.5 41 10/02/2Q1I - 10/08/2011 1.05 1.14 42 10/09/2011 - IO/15/207.J. 1.04, I.12 43 10/7.6/2011 - 10/22/2p11 1.04 1.12 44 1Q/23/2011 - 10/29/2011 1_OS 1_14 45 10/30/201T - 11/05/2011 1.05 1.14 A6 11/06/2011. - 11/12/2011 1.05 1_14 • 47 11/13/2011 - 11/39/2011 1.05 1.14 88 I1/20/2011 - 7.1/26/2011 1.05 I_14 49 11/27/2011 - J.2/03/2011 1.05 2.14 50 12/04/2Q1I - 12/10/2011 1_06 J..15 51 12/11/2Qli - 12/17/2011 1.06 1.15 52 12/J.8/207�7. - 12/24/2011 1.05 I_lA 53 i2/25/2011 - 12/31/2011 1.04 1.12 * Peak Seasoa Paqe 1 of 2 HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Infonnation Intersectlon Information ��''°��*` 'b� Agen GCC Duration,h 0.25 a � AnaEyst VT Anal sis Date 1/24/2013 Area Type Other '� " � ,lurisdiction Clearwater Time Period PM PHF 0.96 � ?' Intersection Mandalay/Ba Eaplanade Analysis Year 2013 Analysis Perfod 1>4:00 � � File Name MNDBAYX.xus Project Deacription PM Peak Hour Existing 2013 �'"� `'"''""r Demand Information EB WB NB � SB Approaoh Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Demand(v},veh/h 6 2 30 28 1 4 59 27S 29 1 219 13 Signal Information '�" a - Cycle,s 100,0 Reference Phase 2 x., , ' - �'" ;: ;i. .; `:.`:::a `:`;;!.;..: . . �: ., Offset,s 0 Reference Point End Green 75.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated Yes Simult.Gap EIW On Yellow 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Fores Mode Fixed Simult.Gap N/S On Red 1.0 1.0 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 � `:::::!: ::::`'•`�``�+'��`:'::': °� ': '`:: Tfiner Results EBl EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBI. SBT Assigned Phase 4 8 2 6 Case IJumber 8,0 8.0 6.0 S.0 Phase Duration,s 20.0 20.0 80.0 80.0 Change Period,(Y+Ro),s 5.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Allow Headwa (MAHJ,s 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 Queue CEearance Time(g8), s 4,1 3.5 7.3 5.7 Green Extension Time(go), s 0.1 0.1 1.2 1.2 Phase Call Probab(Iity 1.00 1.00 1.Q0 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement Group Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 1 6 16 Adjusted Flow Rate(v),veh/h 40 32 81 317 243 AdJusted Saturation Flow Rate(s),veh/h/in 1829 1497 1156 1868 1880 Queue Service Time(gs),s 0.0 0.0 1.6 5.'f 0.0 Cycle Queue Clearanc$Time(gr},s 2.1 1.5 5.3 5.1 3.7 Capacity(c),veh/h 286 291 896 1401 1448 Volume-to-Capacity Ratio{X) 0.138 0.1'[1 0.069 4.226 0.168 : Available Capacity(ce},veh/h 286 291 896 1401 1446 Back of Queue(Q),vehiln(50th percentile) 0.8 0,7 0,3 1.5 1.1 Overflaw Queue{Qs),vehlin 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Queue Storage Ratio(RQ}(50th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 � Uniform Delay(di),s/veh 37.0 36.8 4.4 3.8 3.6 ! Incremenfal Dela {dz),s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 i Initial Queue Delay{ds),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; Control Delay(d},s/veh 37.1 36.8 4.4 3.8 3.6 Levei of Service(L,OS) D D A A A Approach Delay,s/veh/LOS 37.1 D 36,8 D 3.9 A 3.6 A Intersection Delay,s/veh/LOS 7.2 A Multimodal Resutts EB WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score/LOS 2.3 B 2.1 8 2,0 B 2.0 B Bicycle LOS Score/LOS 0.6 A d,5 A 1.1 A 0,9 A Copyrfght�2013 University of Florida,Ail Rights Reserved. HCS 2010T'�Streets Verslon 6.41 Generated:1124l2013 9:06:18 AM Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROI.SUMMARY General Information ite Information al st VT Intersection Roya!Way and Mandalay ve enc /Co. GCC urisdictfon Clearwater Date Performed 9/25✓2013 I sis Year 2013 nal sis Time Period �dstln PM Pro ect Descri tion 13-005 Ba Es lanade EasWVest Street; Ro !Wa Narth/South Street: Mandala Ave Intersection�rientation: North-South tud Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad ustments Ma'or Street NorthE�ound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/fi 247 46 9 293 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.99 1.Oa Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 271 17 1 234 0 veh/h ercent Hea Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- __ Median T e Undivided RT Channelized 0 D Lanes 0 9 0 1 1 0 Confi uration 7R L T U stream Si nal D 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/h � p Peak-MourFactor, PHF 1.00 1.�0 1,00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Hourly Flow Rate, MFR 0 � Q � Q � � veh/h � � Percent Hea Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(°k) 0 0 lared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 p nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 onfi uration LR Dela Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound 3 Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 14 12 ; Lane Configuration L L.R � (veh/h) 1 1 C(m)(veh/h) 9286 523 Ic 0.00 0.00 5%queue Isngth 0.00 0.01 ConErol Delay(s/veh} 7.8 11.9 LOS ,q B pproach Delay(s/veh) -- .- ��,g pproacti LOS -- -- g Copyright�2010 University of Florida,Atl Rlghts Reserved yCS+T� Version 5.6 Generated: 1/25/2013 9:15 RM file:///C:/Users/vtoma/AppData/LocaUTemp/u2kDE54.tmp 1/25/2013 � APPENDIX B I . . ; Generalized Peak HouY Two-Way Volumes for Florida's TABLE 4 Urbanized Areas1 iz/�s/u � • � • � + + STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FR�EWAYS Lnnas B C D E Class I(40 mph orhiglierposted speed limit) 4 4,120 5,540 6,700 7,190 I.anes Mcdian B C D E 6 6,130 8,370 10,4b0 11,100 2 Undivided * 1,510 1,600 "`* g 8,230 11,100 13,390 15,010 4 Divided * 3,420 3,580 ** 10 14,330 14,040 16,840 18,930 6 Divided * 5,250 S,390 ** 12 14,450 18,880 22,030 22,860 8 Divided * 7,090 7,210 ** Class II(35 mph or slower posted speed fimit) Freeway Adjustmenfs Lanes Median B C D E Auxilsary T..nnes Ramp 2 Undivided * 660 1,330 1,414 Present in Both Directions Metering 4 Divided "' 1,310 �2,�92Q� 3,(}44 +1,800 +5% 6 Divided * 2,090 4,500 4,590 8 Divided * 2,880 6,060 6,130 �c�°i�� 2 t_v (7b4 I 2.0� Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjnstments {Alter comsponding state wlumes by the indicated percent.) Non-State Signalized Rosdways -10'/0 �l�% ��.P 1100 Z.Cfl3a Mediatn&Turn Lane AdJustments ��UpTED k`LOW HIGHWAYS Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment �es Median B C D E Lanes Median Lett Lanes Right Lanes FacWrs 2 Divuled Yes No +5°h 2 Undivided 770 1,530 2,170 2,990 2 Undivided No No -20% 4 Divided 3,300 4,660 5,900 b,530 Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 6 Divided 4,950 6,990 8,840 9,790 Multi Undivided No No -25% - - -- Yes *5% Uutnterrupted Flow I3ighway Adjvstments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors One-Way Facitity Adjustment 2 Divided Yes +5% Multiply the corresponding two-clirectional Multi Undivided Yes -5% volumes in this table by 0.6 Multi Undivided No -25% .,.,.:;:...:..::..:..::::.:....;:: - - - - -- .:.�:_5=' _ -- _ - -=;i�;�.4c;�: _�.:!r:_>,< ;;{�::•.C.:=:::::=f_'rx_�z.-F..'� - '-,� '.rz'w �j�.� ...:, ....•.::..�'c;. a.:c°..: �_��;hl:r:_s� ��:. :..��.:::..,.:.,. .. ... ........ aT ` ��. ' ' n.it'i_ii':,�cc:cA:��_�_�..2::_..:'t_:=_..:::-�_:'_...." ' BICYCLL�'MODEZ ::'.i��Vwliiepelipivua�epieseiued�°pgik=[�ouctwo-�veYro(ui�xfor:k `6:ofae neiid�:�" .... . , _ '!4.,._._,�Y..�,-.. _..... • ::�:�;pre'tor'the'autoiiiob_. ':._,k_iriodes un�leas apec[t5catiy;eteted_+7`6is febk d'oea:nof6='�z,- (Multiply snotonzed vehicle volumes shown below by nurnber of - ��..�-..n.- --xn-"�.;-:;{�r-_.,, �� - ''=;corotl(ote��faiida[d-at�t1`sGp�Id.b4E��dd.oDly� I.pla'ailf►I.�iP�Ci 1�1516';7"lie:�;',iti: direcrional roadway]anes to detenuine two-way maximum scrvicc �;:_��.��y.��a-�. �y�.'.deP(vad.�u��b�_�al tb%1ao�"'�k`io"='�^_:�'; volumes. �,.�.,.__,,,,.,. .... �f�°, - ) `::�l!��B�Pp,:.� ioin,"fYc�etib`6ricf.'deil�►in�eoiripatei itiodeb slwuld:not be inad fo��.Y_' _ g::.t -.t� ,.:. -..r.r �j :.: -.�. ,.:. PavedShoUld�Bic Cle �':-:comdo`t__or,io��to°.��'gat;�i`i�a�iiortitif�qa:i«�lyy�:_o'xnes'�'eEu9e�oiis:,a�:<,:i,; Y ?"��based&up�owngap�Lcainm:oPttlp�FfiglnYe'yCqiqy_[y'.Meaiel,�midttie_Tiaroit:-:'.;:`;':; Lane Coverage 13 C D E cep�c�ym��i��st��s�`vle�a�auua� 'j � U-49% * 2b0 680 1,770 �::1 F:�f_��_,�Jfi 1 IF�i�s�t� . ..� . ' . ...�.. .. ,_..,._< .:,... . ;.�_,.;;Gere[ot'aecv�Ior the 6�ycle'.'a'ud.pedca4len modw'in fhie:tablq'is bascd op;nu�nber�: 50-84% 190 600 1,770 >1,770 °_f_-at,nsro'i��ed'�iit,i��'z�'iHSLtiuii�btoftitcyc161'ao''rpedeetrlans':�irigtliei'aci{iy:.:;';;';:';;_:;i.. o Ni�h •;'y'R'9:i��=.*�.r:;�c=�==k'�;<+S,=:ii`::I�� .::mm -��- � _::�.�i--.�-.'k'_-.:.:�;?:':�:=:r:,.:.�.:._:;'r�.',:,:';': ;:';.;-'�•,':::.:;:t::__i:;::;i:.:'':':':':<''...":!::`.::::';:':_'.';. , 85-100% 830 1,770 1,770 "" ...: :..... .. .. . ::. _r.._.kr.�.... _..... _ . ;__?Buses per laur�hujm ere onlY.�v±'I�Pes1c Sn�in H�esingk:dfrectlonoftha.Ligler ea�c.;;::: 2 =;." i 1- ,..... �..;..-...:,:. :....._ . .F" _ _ _ _ . ........ ..�.._.... ..:�::....... ..._....._. ... _... .. .i:.'::'"':'.:::�_':::=:;f..:....�. ::...:.......::::. ...:::'_:_}__, ;e:�_w,>'�.�'__:;=':';r�€;s:;�'i;:,;;t::-;!:::�..'.:';,',�.,':t,:_:::°=.t:.:._-;;::=:.>_:;..,.:'..- - P�DESTRIAN MODE _::_:._ L.:-._.:_ ...., :::....: , ..:....:. ....::._:::..::.:::._�:..:.::.....: . - - - - ..._.l'_�',i:_.v__r°::'.�....�. -... .... __ - _ - _ .. ...�r'....r___.._.......:.........�:.:::�:�......:... - ___ •;•-- ........._. .. ...............::'..::.'.:.�.;.:.....:......: '.-..":'-'�.:::��!i'::'.:'__'.'::'i�:i'....:t...:i�,'.;;:',:.:�:'.;:'.::_-':'_.:_.:.=::::.:.:....:�',',.:..:..:..:.'.:''.:'::':�v-'::.::._�.: ulti I motoriud vehicle volumes ahown below b number of ==+�, -' - • -:.....-.-:�._�__,.._,ti� � 9 Y Y �-. Ca o acluoved us ' ebk ut. "'"""" - _ ---_- = .:.-:.,._:.�"?Pth.::;._....::........�St.,.. :inP. �lued.4feu1�3,:_:::�-:::;::�?::::;j:;::�._;;:: €;:;;_,"_::':Gi_. 1M � i ' __ _ :::�_i;cE.-.r._:�. l ro dwe i w -wa maximum service - -= - ::;.'�`,:.`_'.:�':`::::�s:.::c:__..;-.:.;..:.:,r::r;:=':_'=.�__�::�.,....,. directiona a y lanes co delcrm ne t o y � ": ` r-> `` � ;• :? --- _- _ :::.:"__"'=t:..::i==�_::.�,;�..:�:::':::'::.:'�::::.....:......_..�,___i�:::::-h:_.:�.�::...,..,,_ .. ........ .. .-:ss.Npt.... lica6k. . ... . .. �:�ti�.;; volumes.) - gp�...,,. .8urflptlevelofayiytcelgtt'erg"Fadq;�Fort,ye;�iitqmoDile'iriode,�_,.�,;;:: _:rQ�ume€BredtertLan bveE.oea�rvna p bcao�C btcpino int«sc�tbnca�acdieayl�0.ve_:: _.. i:'6een'rea�hed.Fon c� � mod the lev k ado u�cludiu T Sidewalk Coverage B C D E .. .. .... ....... � tt�r�b w �kofxrvice. acr� Y g )��ac.:-. .�..Y ��- ,�-- . . . I '. .. ]�p - _ `.'ac[ievebte beaeuse Uxie'b rio iiwximum vc6�16 voluriie'ttues Id ns '"'" la h''u i::,.i::` .:...::..-__.,:_:.::-,::...,....... 0-49% * * 250 850 _ _��:_.!p-:,_��:;;- ... ... ..:: .......:.......... .. . . .:...,:.:_. E�,�..... ......... _:... - - - - --_-- ,,.:.�:::.z. :•::';QeNe.dERuka.;`..::..:'.:ti;`e:l;":;�s,::i::Cr�':':__'?:'s':€`_:::'.4;'tir;.::,::>r.:,,::.>.�:.;.._:}s::,-.:-:.-,:�_:: _....__..._.._ 50-84° * 15 80 1 420 <,.,..,..:..:::..:::::::..:.:.:..:.:r�:c;:;';;':;.;::-:�:_-;.•,;,;.��tti;".-:::;:_;:-.::,::�:::::::.:�;=t��:��4r.L`�°-.'-;;,.;i;,.;:. /0 0 7 � �.;.:..::::�,.,:,::,.:,-.::....,....,,...:.-,,.:............:-_:,.� :.:.:.,....,,.:.,.,.:::....�.,._.,..,-�.-,..:...,.<... ,.... ....::..:...:::_,_._:,:.....:.;:.;.:::.,_�.-:::.;,:.�._:,;.fi:..,:�...:rf_:-`:��:r:-:::r:.'::::_,.;.:'>=r:�.a;x::<;:=_.:;:�::_�;r; � � r:'::'`...:'tL`.E:i.!l::.:'i��:;�_;'.�rl�'.:.;�:_;�::.{:,'.,::?`:F,e:_..}:�c:.?�<k;:'::::,.r.:;�.,.;::ti.rA'.ra':.'yzi:�i�.:::a:i'.:::-r:_.. 85-100% 340 9b0 1,560 1,770 , _ _ _- __ -_-_-- . .,._........_.. .._......___.:....z,......�. _._.a::x• .._. . .._.�.�..... . . ..._.�::..�,.:_:.._..: ..,a,...J�;�_'l..:... ...:....... __ ';d"'.:_ _.. :....�. ..... ............ ...... . ' " '_ ' _ .......... .....:......:......:.:.:r�....c:::.�.:,.._.._�_...._._ .�W...,i-.;._._�i_:�:?:.. -= _ __ _3i-E:fs�_ _- - - �;tji_a:�ii:'-`�'�- .��-. - .:s:�'.":.�::::'.:,: '- :=:3;:'s,y. ' ' ' .....�.:. ._.:_.... ...�:�.�::�"i'.. ...... .. ,....._:..:. i:.::,, �.. .,... ..... ._�:",�-•.:,:.;�i . .,.::�.,.�_,�-.:.:..:... _.,i:.�i:..{� - 3 ,-:,:::_.._ ._._,�.-- .:.. ............. �, .... �:_ ::.-s;•.=;;: ....... ,.o-::::..::.:.......::_,...a.o._,,._,_�-i-;. ... ,7=',;:.,.. __- '...'��<__'::'`S'.;:'.?:'ld:. �.......... "� . ..::�.._:�.._.,..�...;.... �...i ... ,:�L'....:=.:.-::�::.:•.:':'::�::::i�.,�-.::-�. _.�._.....w_.._...._..� BUS MOD� Scheduled Fixed Route -..._....:._,,.,.:.,::.:�._...._..a......_._.:....:_.,..,._„,-r._;;��t. ,.>....:.... ......: .,.,:.�. x � ) _...................:.r _, _ -... _ -- _- - - __ .,h;.'_;i;�='I�:S'CL'Si ::q".�.,.,�:. y�{:ti.�,. ,��.�:z�s.� ::L.: j'.'__ _ .a}.:�... --'^:.Y. ;:-i�.-t1...:.. ..�.;:� _:.J::,7.;u.'�1'_� - �::'.�:'.r'r_•.::':':i_-:'t_t'-.LL.:.-i_,�,�"-.'_�'�__a. .t i-�_.,.�::.:.;:...: _ _ _i�.1'_.>i:::':;.�:.:'`_:�:..:_::�'� usesin eakhourin cakdirection :;:;?,:��-..,;:,,,; ..�:,,E�.•-.,�.; _.�..-.:z;;-�:�°.a:-,,.._...�.�...,..r'''.:`-'`_��'':._�;,,::r_�-::�:-:,�::;:;:..... (B P P ) ,�_ �;y�sf �. , �' s -e _c�. � .� �'r��n 'S il:ltlkl[w��c�=.�u'?��-,�-� � . ��'�7y� � � .k Sidewalk Coverage B C D E { ��ht 1,i r :; ��F��'�'.�RCf,�anepon,�«n:: ��., 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 °,��:;s}�stei,n R�an�in�"oi;'xo�'s�_�-r^ _ __>�-._�_ �1�;.�,, . - .n��, -, »a�-=-t_ - __ :_'c;:;�r;.'.r�'`;;:Y=�_�:z:;:3,;.c;Fc_�;�`:';:;:i-:r"l;�::€=�:<''= a > �!www.d�afa'�e.t�"tiislolann'm�Yif4II141A�,` ..�.:;::__ __.3-';_:. .. � iivavdefiwN.shtm>-_;: 85-10U/o >4 >_3 _2 >_ 1 �.�F-.� ;m_:.- �-_;,::,, _ <F�:.- �:�.�:-�,._::::;;>:.::;; ___- __-�_=. �"� -�... ,�:,:.. ,.... �. ,:,��._. �_�,.�...:. :..... -� ,,,,;,,;,,,,;;,��_.. ��-.<., ....�: -------- - ,...... _...: ....:....:..._..._. ........,...,.._- ...... . ,..,:-,,... . -�_......-�..._.. . ....::--<.. 2012 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK TABLES :r �� Hotel (310} Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 10 Average Number of Rooms: 476 w: Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50%exiting Trip Generation per Room `� Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 8,17 3.47 - 9.58 3.38 _: Data Plot and Equation �a,000 . . . , . , , . . . . . , , . . , x i�,oaa �- , - - . .. : .. : .. : . . : .. : .. : . . : . . � - , - � , - - ; . . .. ; .. ; .. ' . . 16,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..: . . . . . . . . .. :.. . . . . .; .. . , .. , . . . ;. .. , . . , .. , .. . 15�000 -. :._..;.. _. '.._.; . . . . . . :•••••- - . . '. ...:... .� .---• • ••,••..:.. . .:. . ..: . ' .. : . . � . � . � . � . � . . . . •y�r 14,OOQ . .. , . . . . . , . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . . , • • '''• . . . - . . . , . . . . . . . , . . .'� . i 3,000 � ��--. .:.. ..:.. . .:. . . .: . . • : •• : -- - :. . ..:... .:. . ..;. . . .:... ' . . . . .;. . ..:. . . c 12,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .. � . . . :_. . � . . � . . � . . � . .'.M. . . � .. . . W , , . . . . : ; : : ; ' �.' : . ; : •�' 11,000 .. , .. , . ; . . , . . , .• . • - . -- . . , .. , -• � ,�:, . . , . . .. , . . , .. � 10,000 • ••:.. . .:. . .. :.. . .:.. . .: . . : . . .:. .. . :. ...:••••• . --;-... ;. . . .:. ..•.• ••.:.. ..:... �� ; 8,U00 ' ;-•• ; • . , . . ; . . : •• ; . . ; _. ; . . : . . : . . : . . . .. : .. : _. . . ; •- � 8,000 -..�....:. . : . . : .. . : ...:... � . . :. „a;:.. : ..;. . . � . . . ; .. ••;••. : .. .. � . . a7,000 -- ; - � ; . . . . , . . , . . . . . � ��. . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . ' . . . _. ' . . . .. � 8,000 • ; •• ; - - - - : • - : - = • : .. : .. : .. .: . . . : .. : . . . . : .. : . . ; . . : .._ ,t� �`� 5.000 .. :.. . .:. . . . :. . . .:. . . . ;• - . .; . . . ;. ...;..._; . . .;. . . .;. •••: . .. .;. . . .:.._;.. . .; . . _ 4,0� • • . •• . - - . . • • . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • , • - . . . , .. , . . . . . . . 3�000 •- : -._:. .... .:... .: .. . :.. . .:. . . :... ; .. : . . :. . . .:. . . : - . : . . : - :. . . :. .. ; X,� : : : : : : : : : : : ; ; ; ; 2,000 •• . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . 1,000 �x','- • -� . ; . . , . . ; .. , .• . -- , •• . •• . . . . . . . . . : .. . .. . . . .. . . . Q . . . . . . . . . . , . , . , , 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 8(1p 900 1000 i100 1200 1300 1400 1540 i&00 1700 1800 1800 X=Number of Rooms X Actual Date Polnts Pitted Curve ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equatlon: T=8.95(X)-373.1 G R2�0.98 I i i Tirp Ganeratfon,9th Edition � lnstitute of Transportation Engineers 613 � I Hotel �,��p^.��,� (310) Average Vehicie Trlp Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour of Generator . Number of Studies: 35 Average Number of Raoms: 294 Directional Distribution: 58% entering, 42% exiting - Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range ot Rates Standard Deviation _ 0.61 0.20 - 1.23 0.81 Da#a Plot and Equation soo ' : ; : x : 500 •........ ..:.. . . . •- . ... . .:. . . . . . . .... . ..-- -..••• . . . . .._ . .. .... .. .. ., - • --- -.. ... - c 40D •-� - - - - - - • , ••• . .. . . . . . . . . .... • -••. � ... . . . . . . . . � . .-•-•• - . . . � ••• •••- - . . W . . : : ; (,-'t. .� . . . . , � ; : : ; ; �X � 300 . . . . . . . . . . •-•... . . . . . . . ...• •• ••• -- . . . . .. . __ ..X...x. .,X'��`x' rn � � � X xX : . . . . .. . -- Q . � ' : 'x X . X ��'� . � 200 . . . . . . ... . .:. . . . . . . . .. . X;. . . .. ... _ . .. , --- •x• • ; •• • - - • • - .. .•r• ••••--- - . . : X : X ; ; ; X ° : : �� ; : ; - 100 � - - - . .. . . � .X .7lISRr �./:. . ... . . . . . . . ... . . . .... .. . . .: .. . . .. . . . .. :. . . . . . . . . . . ,�C��k'' x• X � X� : � x : ; ; ; x : ; : ; ; 0 � � 0 100 200 300 400 500 800 ' X=Number of Rooms :,. �.. X Actual Data Polnts --°--- Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Qiven R2_**•* Trfp Generafion,9th Edition � fnstitute of Transportatfon Engineers 617 . . -_ i i l ; ; I Hotel . (310) ' Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 33 Average Number of Rooms: 200 Directional Distribution: 51°/a entering, 49°/a exiting Trip Generation per Room Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.60 Q,21 - 1.06 0.81 Data Plot and Equation soo , • � ; � ; : � x aoo •• - �--••. . .. . . . ... . ... .. . .. ..'. . . . . . . . ._. . . . . 1 . . . . . . . --•--. . .'. . .. . . w � : �X ; � 300 •- . .. . . . . ... . . . . . . . .. ...... ' .. . . . .. . -• •-•• ; •• •- - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N � ' : X X� �'' � . • ' , i:�� ....... .. . . . . . .. . .. . . ... . . . . .x.••• . . . . . . . • . . �'.. •• . -•- . . {r. U�I 2�� • , . . . . . .. . {;. Q � x� , . �;- II • ; x ; � H : � • ; ; , X . • >': 'X.X. . .X�.:'�"��' X . . . . . . .... . . � •-•. . . . . . . . . .. , . . . .. •••• ._ .. t.,.: i00 . . . . . . . . . . . .. , . �.'. � 'x • X : �� .-' x � • ' ��> x�� x x : ; ; �; : ; . , � o � ipp 200 340 400 590 - X=Number of Rooms X Actual Date Polnta ------ Average Nate R2_.**,� Fitted Curve Equatlon: Not Glven . Trip Generatlon,9th Edition a institute of Transportation Engineers 815 ; i HCS 2010 Signalized Intersection Results Summary General Information intersection Information ��'a�•� '"`� Agency GCC Duration,h 0.25 � k Anal st VT Analysis Date 1/24/2013 Area Type Other ; y � fr Jurisdictlan Clearwater Time Period PM PFiF 0.98 ;� Intersecfion Mandalay/Ba Esplanade Analysis Year 2015 Analysis Period 1>4;00 � �: File Name MNDBAYWP.xus Project Description PM Peak Haur Future 2013 �`'� �+'�� ' Demand Information EB WB NB SB Approach Movement L T R L T R L T R L 'C R Demand(�,vehm 6 2 30 26 1 4 59 308 29 1 252 13 8lgnal Information ;.,, ..., : Cycle,s 100.0 Reference Phase 2 �;, , ' �'�� 'r� ,', i. ::;.;':.`.:`::>e`�:`4 Offset,s 0 Reference Point End Green. 75.Q 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Uncoordinated Yes Simult.Gap E/W On Yellow 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ForceMode Flxed Simult.GapN/S On Red 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 `::�:� `;:::::`:°::':i� ;:`° 'x `':'::::`: :e 7imer Results EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL N67 SBL SBT Assigned Phase 4 8 2 6 Case Number 8.0 8.0 6.0 B.0 Phase Duration,s 20.0 2Q.0 80.0 80.0 Change Period,(Y+Rc),s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 MaxAllow Headway(MAH),s 3.2 3.2 3,1 3.1 Queue Clearance Time(ge), s 4.7 3.5 8.0 6.3 Green Extension Time(ge),s 0.1 0.1 1.3 1.3 Phase CaIE Probability 1.00 1.b0 1.00 1.00 Max Out Probability 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 Mavement G�oup Results EB WB NB SB Approach Movement l. T R L T R L T R L T R Assigned Movement 7 4 14 3 8 18 5 2 12 9 6 16 Ad'usted Flow Rate(v),veh/h 40 32 61 351 277 Adjusted Saturation Fbw Rate(s),veh/h/ln 1829 1497 1121 1871 1883 Queue Service Time(gs),a 0.0 0.0 1.Z 5.8�. 0.0 Cycle Queue Clearance Time(�),s 2.1 1.5 6.0 5.8 4,3 Capacity{c),veh/h 286 291 864 1403 1448 Volume-fo-Capacity Ratio(X) 0.138 0.111 0.077 0.250 0.191 Availabie Capacity(ce),vehm 288 291 864 1403 1448 Back of Queue(Q),vehAn(50th percentile) 0,8 0.7 0.3 1.7 1.2 I Overflow Queue(Q3),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Queue Storage Ratio(RQ)(50th percentile) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 ` Uniform Defay(dr),s/veh 37.0 36,8 4,5 3.8 3.7 j Incremental Delay(dz),s/veh 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 ; Inifial Queue Delay(d3},s/veh 0.0 0.0 O.d 0.0 0.0 Control Delay(d),s/veh 37.1 38.8 4.6 3.9 3.7 Level of Service(LOS) D D A A A Approach Delay,s/veh/LOS 37,1 D 36.8 D 4.0 A 3.7 A lntersection Delay,s/veh/LOS 7.0 A Multimodal Resuits E8 WB NB SB Pedestrian LOS Score/LOS 2.3 B 2.1 B 2.0 B 2.0 B , Bicycle LOS Score/LOS 0.6 A d.5 A 1.2 A 0.9 A Copyright�2013 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved. HCS 2010TM Streets Version 6.41 Generated:112b12013 1:34:00 PM , , Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General information Site Information al st VT ntersection oya!Way and Mandalay ve en /Co. GCC urisdiction Cleanaater Date Performed ?/25JZ093 na sis Year 2095 nal sis Time Period uture PM Pro ect Descri tion 13-005 Ba Es lanade EastlWest Street: Ro a/Wa Nocth/South Street: MandaJa Ave [ntersection Orientation: North-South tud Period hrs : 025 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma or Street Northbound Southbound ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume vehlh 252 44 4 219 eak-Hour Factor PHF 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 0,91 9.00 ourly Flow Rate,NFR � 27g 48 4 240 0 vehlh ercent Hea Vehicfes 0 -- — 0 -- -- ed€an T e Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Canfi uration TR L T U stream Si nal 0 � Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 1'f 12 L T R L T R olume velUh 28 3 Peak-Hour Factor,PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 0 0 0 30 0 3 veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 D RT Channelized o a nes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Confl ura#ion LR Dsia Queue Len th and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound i Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 91 12 I Lane Configuration L LR (veh/h) 4 33 C(m�(veh/h) '1247 514 !c 0.00 0.06 95%queue length 0.01 0.21 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 12.5 LOS A B pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 12.5 pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright�2010 UnNersity of Fbrida,Ail Righta Reserved }{pS+TM Version 6.8 Generated: 1/2512013 1:33 PM file:///C:/Users/vtoma/AppData/LocaUTexnp/u2kGC4E.nnp 1/25/2013 • Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General lnformation Site Information nal st VT Intersection Bay Esplansde and Drivewa en /Co. GCC urisdiction Clearvvater Date Performed 1/25J'2013 nal sis Year 20l5 nal sis Time Period uture PM Pro'ect Descri tion 13-005 Ba Es lanade East/West Street: ea Es lanade North/South Street: Drrvewa Inter�ection Orientation: East-West tud Perlod hrs ; 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R l. T R alume veh/h 31 5 0 5 0 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.91 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.91 9.00 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 34 5 0 0 5 D veh/h Percent Heav Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median T e Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 9 0 1 1 1 Confl uratlon LT l. T R U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume veh/t� 30 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF J.00 1.00 9.00 1.00 1.04 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR p � 0 0 0 32 veh/h Percent Hea Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade{%) a 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 ; RT Channelized 0 0 ; Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 9 � Confi uration R � Dala Qusue Len th anci Leve!of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 8 10 11 12 ! l.ane Configuration LT L R (veh/h) 34 0 32 (m)(veh/h) 1630 1630 i084 Ic 0.02 0,aa 0.03 95°�queue length 0.06 O.U� 0.09 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.3 7.2 8.4 LOS A A A pproach Delay(s/veh) -- -- 8.4 pproach LOS -- -- A Capyrlght�2010 Universily of Florida,All Rights Reserved }�S+T� Veraion 5.6 Generated: 1/25l2013 1:38 PM file:///C:/Users/vtoma/AppDaYa/Local/Temp/u2k9CFF.tmp 1/2S/2013