The URL can be used to link to this page

2316 DREW ST1'1/25/2003 16:32 8136550643 BOLLENBACK BUILDERS PAGE 01 OID%--, E34CK BUILDERS, INC. FAX COVER SHEET Drew Professional Park 2316 Drew Street Clearwater, FL 33765 To: i 7r < hj//,-hV to Frorrr: Jamie Phipps Phone: (727) 725 -1207 Fax: (727) 7253652 Company: `C Fax: Phone: �� 2 -�— 417311 Pages: _ (Including cover sheet) Re: f re ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment 0 Please Reply ❑ originals to Follow via: Comment /Contents: Rere � 4�t° mv�3e� A'W iP% d1ti r�P �uVe/P� Fl3, 36 The information in this transmission is confidential and is intended only for the ueip . of the individual or entity named above. (f the reoder of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have receioed this transmission in error, or ifyou ore not the individual or entity nomad above, please note us by telephone (collect), and return the oe;git9ol message to us at the above address via US, Postal Service. You will be rgimbursed for any —r— nr ten„ Arbor 0Y."on e, aecArtated with the return orthis document. Thank vutu. r } Westenberger Tree Service Inc. Certified Arborist & Tree Installation 2030 58th Street N Clearwater, Florida 33760 (727) 535 -9770 (727) 507 -8733 (fax) E -Mail: info @wesoveyourtrees.com - Website: www.wesaveyourtrees.com r"s"'d Tree Inventory With Condition Ratings For Bollenback Builders, Inc. Dr' d v Professional Park, Clearwater, Florida The Tree Inventory performed on June 22, 2003, by Westenberger Tree Service is summarized below. The site previously had a Tree Appraisal prepared on November 6, 2002. This report comprises data on 86 trees. No tree tags have been physically placed on the trees. The tag # reflects the number assigned on The Tree Preservation Plan Survey. The original tree appraisal did not include the condition rating of the trees. The condition rating is needed by the City of Clearwater for mitigation purposes; thus, we have provided that data. The following spread sheets are provided: 1. Master List (All trees on the survey). 2. Not On Property List (Trees on the survey possibly impacted by construction). 3. Preservation List (Trees to be protected; Above 50% Condition Rating). 4. Removal List (Trees allowed to be removed; Below 50% Condition Rating and smaller than 8" DBH, diameter -at- breast - height). In summary the Preservation List is of importance in determining any mitigation. A review of the site would possibly be needed to document any existing trees. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, 040K s Lynn N. Scheer Vice President Certified Arborist, FL -1076A Roadside Vegetation Management Specialist Cc: Rick Albee, City of Clearwater Attachments Bollenback Builders, Drew Professional Park, Clearwater, FL_ June 22, 2003 TAG # COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME DBH inches CONDITION RECOMMENDATIONS 2 Live -Oak Quercus virglniana 8 60% Class III prune, Elevate 12 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 45 60% Mechanical support 13 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 11 60% Class III prune, Elevate 14 Live -Oak Quercus virglniana 12 60% Class III prune, Elevate 15 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 8 55% Class III prune, Elevate 18 Live- Oak Quercus virglniana 18 60% Class III prune, Elevate 22 Live, Oak Quercus virglniana 19 65% Class III prune, Elevate 24 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 9 60% Class III prune, Elevate 37 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 9 70% Class III prune, Elevate 38 Camphor Camphora 11 70% Class III prune, Elevate 39 Mimosa Tree Acacia 20 60% Class III prune, Elevate 48 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 12 70% Class III prune, Elevate 50 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 9 70% Class III prune, Elevate 53 Live -Oak Quercus virglniana 16 65% Class III prune, Elevate 55 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 19 70% Class III prune, Elevate 61 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 20 70% Class III prune, Elevate 63 Live Oak Quercus virglniana 12 60% Class III prune, Elevate 64 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolla 12 55% Class III prune, Elevate 69 Live -Oak Quercus virglniana 21 65% Class III prune, Elevate 83-86 Live-Oak Quercus virglniana multi 65% Class III prune, Elevate Westenberger Tree Service On utility easement On utility easement On utility easement On utility easement On utility easement On utility easement preserve preserve Mechanical Support Group not on Survy Condition report for original tree inventory Page 1 of 1 Preservation List Bollenback Builders, Drew Professional Park, Clearwater, FIB June 22, 2003 TAG # COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME DBH(inches) CONDITION RECOMMENDATIONS 1 Live -Oak Quercus virglniana 8 75% 2 Live -Oak Quercus virglniana 8 60% Class III prune, Elevate 3 Live<Oak Quercus virglniana 8 cull Remove tree & stump Melaleuca Melaleuca 9,10,12,12 cull Remove tree & stump Melaleuca Melaleuca 14,9 cull Remove tree & stump Melaleuca Melaleuca 7 cull Remove tree & stump Melaleuca Melaleuca 10,.9,9,10,8 cull Remove tree & stump 4 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 15 25% 5 Cherry Laurel ,Prunus caroliniana 6 25% 6 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 11 25% 7 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 14 25% 8 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 20 25% 9 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 15 25% 10 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 11 25% 11 Golden Rain Koelreuteria elegans 5 60% 12 Laurel Oak Quercus laurffolia 45 60% Mechanical support 13 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 11 60% Class III prune, Elevate 14 Live<Oak Quercus virglniana 12 60% Class III prune, Elevate 15 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 8 55% Class III prune, Elevate 16 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 4 cull 17 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 4 cull 18 Live -Oak Quercus virglniana 18 60% Class III prune, Elevate Westenberger Tree Service Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property On utility easement On utility easement On utility easement On utility easement Condition report for original tree inventory Page 1 of 4 Master List f; Bollenback Builders, Drew Professional Park, Clearwater, FL June 22, 2003 TAG # COMMON NAME ;BOTANICAL NAME DBN inches CONDITION RECOMMENDATIONS 19 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 4 cull 20 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 4 cull 21 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 9 50% Class III prune, Elevate 22 Live- Oak Quercus virg/niana 19 65% Class III prune, Elevate 23 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 5 cull 24 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 9 60% Class III prune, Elevate 25 Mimosa Tree Acacia 49 60% Remove tree & stump 26 Mimosa Tree Acacia 6 cull 27 Mimosa Tree Acacia 20 60% Remove tree & stump 28 Mimosa Tree Acacia 21 60% Remove tree & stump 29 Mimosa Tree Acacia 34 60% Remove tree & stump 30 Mimosa Tree Acacia 18 40% Remove tree & stump 31 Mimosa Tree Acacia 11 40% Remove tree & stump 32 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 5 cull 33 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 5 cull 34 Mimosa Tree Acacia 20 60% Remove tree & stump 35 Mimosa Tree Acacia 20 60% Remove tree & stump 36 Mimosa Tree Acacia 30 60% In power lines 37 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 9 70% Class III prune, Elevate 38 Camphor iCamphora 11 70% Class III prune, Elevate 39 Mimosa Tree Acacia 20 60% Class III prune, Elevate 40 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 6 cull Westenberger Tree Service On utility easement hazardous hazardous . hazardous hazardous hazardous hazardous hazardous hazardous On utility easement Condition report for original tree inventory Page 2 of 4 Master List Bollenback Builders, Drew Professional Park, Clearwater, FL June 22, 2003 TAG # COMMON NAME i3OTANICAL NAME DB¢i(inches) 41 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 6 42 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 5 43 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 5 44 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 30 45 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 5 46 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 6 47 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 4 48 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 12 49 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 4 50 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 9 51 Live Oak Quercus virglniana 35 52 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffrana 15ft 53 Live Oak Quercus virglniana 16 54 Live Oak Quercus virglniana 6 55 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 19 56 Live Oak Quercus virglniana 19 57 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 8 58 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 5 59 Slash Pine .Pious elliothi 6 60 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 8 61 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 20 CONDITION RECOMMENDATIONS cull cull cull cull cull cull cull 70% Class III prune, Elevate cull 70% Class III prune, Elevate 65% 60% 65% Class 111 prune, Elevate cull Remove tree & stump 70% Class III prune, Elevate 65% 60% cull cull Westenberger Tree Service Not on property Not on property Not on property On utility easement preserve Not on property Not on property Not Present On Site 70% Class III prune, Elevate preserve Condition report for original tree inventory - Page 3 of 4 Master List Bollenback Builders, Drew Professional Park, Clearwater, FL June 22, 2003 TAG # COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME 62 Live- Oak Quercus virglniana 63 Live Oak Quercus virglniana 64 Lauiel Oak Quercus laurifolia 65 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 66 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 67 Live- Oak Quercus virglniana 68 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 69 Live -Oak Quercus virglniana 70 -80 Live -Oak Quercus virglniana 81 Live, Oak Quercus virglniana 82 Turkey Oak Quercus laevis 83 -86 Live -Oak Quercus virglniana DBH(inches) CONDITION RECOMMENDATIONS 52 80% 12 60% Class III prune, Elevate 12 55% Class III prune, Elevate 18 50% Class III prune, Elevate 10 cull Remove tree & stump 22 60% 6 cull 21 65% Class III prune, Elevate 70% as aj group 9 45% Remove tree & stump 22 cull Remove tree & stump multi 65% Class III prune, Elevate Westenberger Tree Service Not on property diseased Not on property Mechanical Support Not on property Growing in, Turkey Oak Decay & Conks Group not on survey Condition report for original tree inventory Page 4 of 4 Master List Bollenback Builders, Drew Professional Park, Clearwater, RL June 22, 2003 TAG # COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME DBH( inches) CONDITION RECOMMENDATIONS 3 Liv&Oak Quercus virglniana 8 cull Remove tree & stump Melaleuca !Melaleuca 9,10,12,12 cull Remove tree & stump Melaleuca Melaleuca 14,9 cull Remove tree & stump Melaleuca Melaleuca 7 cull Remove tree & stump Melaleuca Melaleuca 109'9'10'8 cull Remove tree & stump 11 Golden Rain Kdelreuteria alegans 5 60% 16 Cherry Laurel Rrunus caroliniana 4 cull 17 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 4 cull 19 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 4 cull 20 Cherry Laurel ,Prunus caroliniana 4 cull 21 Cherry Laurel Rrunus caroliniana 9 50% Class III prune, Elevate 23 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 5 cull 25 Mimosa Tree Acacia 49 60% Remove tree & stump 26 Mimosa Tree Acacia 6 cull 27 Mimosa Tree Acacia 20 60% Remove tree & stump 28 Mimosa Tree Acacia 21 60% Remove tree & stump 29 Mimosa Tree Acacia 34 60% Remove tree & stump 30 Mimosa Tree Acacia 18 40% Remove tree & stump 31 Mimosa Tree Acacia 11 40% Remove tree & stump 32 Cherry Laurel Rrunus caroliniana 5 cull hazardous hazardous hazardous hazardous hazardous hazardous Westenberger "free Service Condition m. -port for original tree inventory Page 1 of 2 Removal List Bollenback Builders, Drew professional Parr, Clearwater, RL_ June 22, 2003 TAG # CQMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME DBIA(inches) CONDITION RE. OMMENDATIONS 33 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 5 cull Cherry Laurel 34 Mimosa Tree Acacia 20 60% Remove tree & stump 35 Mimosa Tree Acacia 20 60% Remove tree & stump 36 Mimosa Tree Acacia 30 60% Remove tree & stump 40 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 6 cull 41 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 6 cull 42 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 5 cull 43 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 5 cull 45 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 5 cull 46 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 6 cull 47 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 4 cull 49 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 4 cull 54 Live -Oak - Quercus virg /niana 6 cull 58 Slash Pine Pinus elliottii 5 cull 59 Slash Pine Pinus elliothi 6 cull 65 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 18 50% 66 Laurel Oak Quercus Iaurffid is 10 cull 68 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 6 cull 81 Live-Oak Quercus virglniana 9 45% 82 Turkey Oak Quercus laevis 22 cull Remove tree & stump Westenberger Tree Service hazardous hazardous On utility easement In power Girses Class III prune, Elevate Remove tree & stump diseased Remove tree & stump Growing irt Turkey Oak Remove tree & stump Decay, conks Condition report for original tree inventory Page 2 of 2 Removal List Bollenback Builders, Drew Professional Park, Clearwater, FL June 22, 2003 TAG # COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME DBH(inches) CONDITION RECOMMENDATIONS 1 Live Oak Quercus virglniana 8 75% 4 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 15 25% 5 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 6 25% 6 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 11 25% 7 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 14 25% 8 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 20 25% 9 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 15 25% 10 Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 11 25% 44 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifotia 30 cull 51 Live- Oak Quercus virglniana 35 65% 52 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzofana 15ft 60% 56 Live- Oak Quercus virglniana 19 65% 57 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifotia 8 60% 60 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifotia 8 Not Present On Site 62 Live Oak Quercus virglniana 52 80% 67 Live-Oak Quercus virglniana 22 60% 70 -80 Live!Oak Quercus virglniana 70% as angroup Westenberger Tree Service Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Not on property Condition report for original tree inventory Page 1 of 1 Notion Property I, T 4� o D Tree Appraisal prepared for J. J. Sosa & Associates 5211 Memorial Highway Suite 207 Tampa, FL 33615 -5000 (813) 888 -6525 by David M Zaparanick November 6, 2002 DEC 2CQ2 h JL Tree appraisal for corner lot of Drew St. and Anna Ave. in Clearwater, Fl., as shown on survey plan provided to me by J.J. Sosa & Associates. Overall this property has nine species of trees that are of significance size and value to be commented on for this report. I used the tree survey provided to me by J.J. Sosa & Associates to identify the trees listed in my report. Of the oaks identified most are either Quercus vir iniana, Live Oak, or Quercus laurifolia, Laurel Oak, one tree is Quercus falcata, Southern Red Oak. The trees identified in the legend as Mamosa (incorrect spelling, should be Mimosa) is Enterlobium contortisiliquum,or Earlobe tree. The pine trees are Pinus palustris, Longleaf pine; the Cherry Laurels are Prunus caroliniana, the Camphor tree, is Cinnamomum camphora. The Chinaberry was incorrectly identified and actually is Golden -Rain Tree, Koelreuteria ele amens, and Queen Palm, S yagrus romanzo f anum. I did find that the survey to not be completely accurate. There is a significant clump of native oak trees close the eastern property line that was not included in the survey. I included them at the end of my report This property has a total of 86 trees. Of these trees, a small percentage of trees will be directly or adversely affected by proposed buildings or proposed parking or travel lanes as shown by the master plan provided to me on November 4, 2002 by J. J. Sosa & Associates. One exception is a 45" Live Oak that grows in center of the plot on the western third of the property. I have described it in further detail below in item number 12. 1. Quercus sp., 8" Oak. There are some pruning cuts, but overall the tree is in good health. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 2. Ouercus sp., 8" Oak. There are some pruning cuts, but overall the tree is in good health. This tree is leaning onto the said property because pruning has kept it from growing straight up to avoid power lines. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 3. Ouercus sp., 8" Oak. There are some pruning cuts, but overall the tree is in good health. This tree is growing almost parallel to the ground because pruning has kept it from growing straight up to avoid power lines. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 4. Prunus caroliniana, 15" Cherry Laurel. This tree is on private property. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. This tree is in poor health as two major branches have major decay and rot. 5. Prunus caroliniana, 6" Cherry Laurel. This tree is on private property. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. This tree is in poor health as the trunk has major rot and not worth saving. 6. Prunus caroliniana, 11" Cherry Laurel. This tree is on private property. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. This tree is in good health although it has as two wounds. 2 7. Prunus caroliniana, 14" Cherry Laurel. This tree is on private property. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. Generally it is in good health although it does not have good form as it has been pruned to avoid overhead power lines. One branch, overhanging the above property, is rotting and should be pruned off. 8. Prunus caroliniana, 20" Cherry Laurel. This tree is on private property. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. The tree is in good health, although it has been pruned to avoid overhead power lines. 9. Prunus caroliniana, 15" Cherry Laurel. This tree is on private property. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. The tree is in good health, although it has been pruned to avoid overhead power lines. 10. Prunus caroliniana, 11" Cherry Laurel. This tree is on private property. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. The tree is in good health, although the entire tree overhangs the above property. It has been pruned to avoid overhead power lines. 11. Koelreuteria elegans 5" Golden -Rain Tree. This is an exotic tree. One branch is growing into a man made structure and is severely girdled. Therefore, that branch is weakened and will ultimately fail. This tree will be removed to allow for proposed development of this property. 12. Quercus virginiana, 45" Live Oak. This is a native tree. This is a magnificent specimen of a Live Oak. It has no obvious flaws. In fact, it is so near a perfect tree it should be a serious consideration to incorporate it into the master plan. Few, large, nearly perfect specimen Live Oaks exist in Pinellas County. Live Oaks can live to between 200 -300 yrs old. This tree, I hesitate to estimate, is around 150 yrs old. It is approximately 45 feet tall, and has a canopy spread of 60'. It has perfect symmetry, which is unusual, but is due to the fact that it is not bound on any side. If not incorporated into the site plan, protected during development, and given plenty of space for its roots, it will be removed. The only thing that this tree would need is to removed the undergrowth and a few dead branches in the canopy of the tree. It is natural for a tree to have dead branches, so they are no cause for concern. 13. Prunus caroliniana. 11" Cherry Laurel. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. The tree is young and in good health. It is leaning over because of pruning to avoid overhead power lines and to grow towards light. 14. Quercus sp., 12" Oak. This tree is in good health, although it is leaning over because of pruning to avoid overhead power lines. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 15. Quercus sp., 8" Oak. This tree is in good health, although it is leaning over because of pruning to avoid overhead power lines. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 16. Prunus caroliniana. 4" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is healthy, although it is growing towards the light and is one - sided. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 17. Prunus caroliniana, 4" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is healthy, although it is growing towards the light and is one - sided. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 18. Quercus sp., 18" Oak. This tree is in good health. Although, it is growing in one direction because it has been pruned to avoid overhead power lines and is growing towards the light. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 19. Prunus caroliniana. 4" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is healthy, although it is growing towards the light and is one - sided. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 20. Prunus caroliniana, 4" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is a healthy, although it is growing towards the light and is one - sided. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 21. Prunus caroliniana, 9" Cherry Laurel. This is a young tree. It is healthy, although it is growing towards the light and is one - sided. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 22. Quercus sp., 19" Oak. This tree is in good health. Although, it is growing in one direction because it has been pruned to avoid overhead power lines and is growing towards the light. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 23. Prunus caroliniana, 5" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. Although, it is growing towards the light and is one - sided. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 24. Prunus caroliniana, 9" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. Although, it is growing towards the light and is one - sided. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 25. Enterlobium contortisiliquum, 49" Earlobe Tree. This is an exotic tree. The seedpods and branches can be messy and will require maintenance to remove from parking spaces. It is a healthy tree that provides much shade. The proposed development of the property encroaches significantly into the root system of this tree. This will significantly impact the tree and cause it to decline and eventual removal.* 26. Enterlobium contortisiliquum, 6" Earlobe Tree. This is an exotic tree. The seedpods and branches can be messy and will require maintenance to remove from parking spaces. It is a healthy tree. The proposed development of the property encroaches into the root system of this tree. This will impact the tree, but because it is a small tree it will likely recover.* 27. Enterlobium contortisiliquum, 20" Earlobe Tree. This is an exotic tree. The seedpods and branches can be messy and will require maintenance to remove from parking spaces. It is a healthy tree. The proposed development of the property encroaches significantly into the root system of this tree. This will significantly impact the tree and cause it to decline and eventual removal. * 28. Enterlobium contortisiliquum, 21" Earlobe Tree. This is an exotic tree. The seedpods and branches can be messy and will require maintenance to remove from parking spaces. It is a healthy tree. The proposed development of the property encroaches into the root system on one side of the tree. This will impact the tree, but with proper protection during construction it will like recover. * 4 I I 29. Enterlobium contortisiliquum, 34" Earlobe-Tree. This is an exotic tree. The seedpods and branches can be messy and will require maintenance to remove from parking spaces. It is a healthy tree that provides much shade. The proposed development of the property encroaches into the root system on one side of the tree. This will impact the tree, but with proper protection during construction it will like recover. * 30. Enterlobium contortisiliquum, 18" Earlobe Tree. This is an exotic tree. The seedpods and branches can be messy and will require maintenance to remove from parking spaces. It is a healthy tree. The proposed development of the property encroaches into the root system on one side of the tree. This will impact the tree, but with proper protection during construction it will like recover. * 31. Enterlobium contortisiliquum, 11" Earlobe Tree. This is an exotic tree. The seedpods and branches can be messy and will require maintenance to remove from parking spaces. It is a healthy tree. The proposed development of the property encroaches significantly into the root system of this tree. This will significantly impact the tree and cause it to decline and eventual removal. * 32. Prunus caroliniana. 5" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is a healthy tree. It is growing between trees number 26 and 31. The proposed development of the property encroaches significantly into the root system of this tree. This will significantly impact the tree and cause it to decline and eventual removal. * 33. Prunus caroliniana. 5" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is a healthy tree. It is growing between trees number 26 and 31. The proposed development of the property encroaches significantly into the root system of this tree. This will significantly impact the tree and cause it to decline and eventual removal. * 34. Enterlobium contortisiliquum, 20" Earlobe Tree. This is an exotic tree. The seedpods and branches can be messy and will require maintenance to remove from parking spaces. It is a healthy tree. This tree will have to be removed because of the proposed development of the property. 35. Enterlobium contortisiliquum, 20" Earlobe Tree. This is an exotic tree. The seedpods and branches can be messy and will require maintenance to remove from parking spaces. It is a healthy tree. This tree will have to be removed because of the proposed development of the property. 36. Enterlobium contortisiliquum, 30" Earlobe Tree. This is an exotic tree. The seedpods and branches can be messy and will require maintenance to remove from parking spaces. It is a healthy tree. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 37. Prunus caroliniana. 9" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is a healthy tree. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 18 Cinnamomum camphora, 11" Camphor tree. This is a young healthy tree. It is an exotic tree. This is a long -lived tree, somewhat invasive, but when large can provide much shade. It is surround by other invasive exotic species, and when they are removed this tree may be damaged. It will need protection during clearing and grubbing. The proposed development around the tree will encroach significantly into the root system and will likely severely damage it to the point that it will not survive. 39. Enterlobium contortisiliquum, 20" Earlobe Tree. This is an exotic tree. The seedpods and branches can be messy and will require maintenance to remove from parking spaces. It is a healthy tree. This tree will have to be removed because of the proposed development of the property. 40. Prunus caroliniana. 6" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is healthy, although it is growing towards the light and is one - sided. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed 5 development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 41. Prunus caroliniana, 6" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is healthy, although it is growing towards the light and is one - sided. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 42. Prunus caroliniana, 5" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is healthy, although it is growing towards the light and is one - sided. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 43. Prunus caroliniana, 5" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is healthy, although it is growing towards the light and is one - sided. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 44. Quercus sp., 30" Oak. This tree is in good health. It does have one major branch that is broken and should be pruned off. It is unlikely to be affected by proposed development as it is far enough away that its roots and branches will not likely be affected. 45. Prunus caroliniana, 5" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is a very healthy tree. It has good form and should be kept if possible. It is far enough away from the proposed development that it will very likely recover from any disturbance. 46. Prunus caroliniana, 6" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young health tree. This tree will have to be removed because of the proposed development of the property. 47. Prunus caroliniana, 4" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young healthy tree. It has good form and should be kept if possible. Although proposed development may disturb some of the root system, it should be able to recover well if properly protected during development. 48. Prunus caroliniana, 12" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young healthy tree. It has good form and should be kept if possible. Although proposed development may disturb some of the root system, it should be able to recover well if properly protected during development. 49. Prunus caroliniana. 4" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is a very healthy tree. It has good form and should be kept if possible. It is far enough away from the proposed development that it will very likely recover from any disturbance. 50. Prunus caroliniana. 9" Cherry Laurel. This is a small young tree. It is a very healthy tree. It has good form and should be kept if possible. It is far enough away from the proposed development that it will very likely recover from any disturbance. 51. Ouercus sp., 35" Oak. This oak is on private property. Overall the tree is in good health. It should have some routine maintenance done to remove some dead branches. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 52.S agrus romanzo fianum 9 "Queen Palm. This palm is on private property. This palm is in good health. It has approximately 15' of clear trunk. The palm canopy is growing in the canopy of the nearby oak, number 51. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. S3 uercus sp., 16" Oak. This tree is leaning over, and is almost dead. This tree should be removed. 54. Quercus sp., 6" Oak. Overall the tree is in good health. It is leaning over. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. R 55. Quercus sp., 19" Oak. Overall the tree is in good health. It has great form. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 56. Ouercus sp., 19" Oak. This tree is on private property. Overall the tree is in good health. It has great form. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 57. Ouercus sp., 8" Oak. This tree is on private property. Overall the tree is in good health. It has great form. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 58. Pinus palustris, 5" Longleaf Pine. This pine has a straight trunk, and looks to be in good health. Removing the invasive exotics around it should release the pine to allow it to fill out and grow normally. If this tree is affected by grading for the proposed retention pond, it not likely that the tree will survive. 59. Pinus palustris, 6" Longleaf Pine. This pine has a straight trunk, and looks to be in good health. Removing the invasive exotics around it should release the pine to allow it to fill out and grow normally. If this tree is affected by grading for the proposed retention pond, it not likely that the tree will survive. 60. Supposedly an 8" Oak. I was not able to locate this tree. 1.Quercus sp., 19" Oak. Overall the tree is in impeccable health. It is a magnificent tree. Depending on how much grading is done around the tree to make the proposed retention pond, it has a good chance to survive. The more root protection, and with minimal root disturbance I would give the tree a good chance to survive. I would have to see the ading lan to make any further assessment. 62. Ouercus sp., 52" Oak. This tree is on private property. Overall the tree is in impeccable health. It is a magnificent tree. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 63. Ouercus sp., 12" Oak. Overall the tree is in good health. It has great form. The vines growing on it should be removed. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 64. Quercus sp., 12" Oak. Overall the tree is in good health. It has great form. The vines growing on it should be removed. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 65. Quercus sp., 18" Oak. Overall the tree is in good health. It has great form. The vines growing on it should be removed. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 66. Ouercus sp., 10" Oak. Overall the tree is in moderate health. It has great form. This tree does have a disease that is affecting approximately 95% of the leaves. The disease may weaken the tree over time but is not likely to kill it. It should be watched. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 67. Ouercus sp., 22" Oak. This tree is on private property. Overall the tree is in good health. It has great form. The vines growing on it should be removed. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 68. Quercus sp., 6" Oak. This tree has bad form, as it is leaning to one side. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 7 69. Quercus sp., 21" Oak. Overall the tree is in good health. It has great form. It is unlikely that this tree will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 70. through 80 Quercus sp., 12" Oak. These trees are on private property. Overall the trees are very healthy. They have great form. They provide much afternoon shade for the building to the east of them. As long as they are protected during development, it is unlikely that these trees will be affected by development on the above said property, as it is far enough away that the roots and branches should not be affected. 81. Ouercus sp., 9" Oak. Overall the tree is in good health. This tree is young and with proper protection during development could survive, given that the proposed development has enclosed it into a parking island. 82. Quercus falcata, 22" Southern Red Oak. Overall the tree is in poor health. Some branches are rotting and have shelf fungus growing on it. It would be a hazard to people and property if left standing. It is recommended that it be removed. 83. through 86. Quercus sp., Oak. These trees were not listed on the survey. They are a significant clump located about 75 feet from the eastern property line. There are four oak trees of about 10" diameters each. Overall the tree is in good health. They have good form. The surrounding vegetation should be removed. Due to proposed development these trees will be removed. * Trees from number 25 through 33 are growing closely together. Their roots and branches are growing very closely and are intertwined. Because of this, if one or more trees are removed, the ones remaining will be affected, albeit - adversely. Because of this, I loosely recommend, that this group of trees almost be considered as one tree. A decision to either keep or remove any one tree should be applied to all the trees. If the trees are to be kept, I would recommend that the parking island, ten spaces to the east, be moved to join the parking island that surrounds these trees 25 through 33. This will give the trees a much better chance at surviving, given proper tree protection. The 1 I" tree, number 38, is not as valuable to save, as it is an exotic and is much smaller in comparison to this large group of trees. Respectfully submitted, David Zaparanick Certified Arborist Certificate Number 171 -1010A n. LLJ 1i tt iJ '10� NbNNt�pN! D9Zgtbp?BLZL 6G :eQ MUSCAT • 1. * 11/25/2003 16:32 8136550643 BOLLENBACK BUILDERS PAGE 02 g�e�6 �_ tea►^ � M r tt� ► � �► f �t�'t r � i 'i , %p y w r - WINI �rJ"! A 00 low INS 1 �f i r � 40 4% UY tp jop K ; 3 �ci N3IVS NN"" b�Z`3ZVOOZZL 65;80 CMI Z /TT d' SL�ESfif�E C 8 SM39 1 i na ADHSNaiiou WdEO s Z T CODE S2 A0W ff memwoomm I F n F N n STORM SEKR Lb COORDINATION MAP FU'R TREE APPRAISAL SECTION 7, TWP9 29 Sol RNG,, 16 E, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA UNE a�RECTtON aisraNCE 4 LAE Ll N00 14 E 38.11 a'm �'�` N00.24IR 38.12'M ��' 3 JURISDIC70AI. DELINEATION BY 0 ) _ PTA ( AIL) 1 1�• '34401 20.01 1 i ' 1 i "• . 15. i FCM 44' LBI 2610 S.E. COlM OF DREW OFFICE PARK A CONDOMINIUM — PHASE 1 ti � r■ us OM COMMONLY RECOGN17ED AND /OR ACCEPTED ABBREVIATIONS ARE ALSO LlTlUZED BUT NOT SPECIFIED HEREW -r c FOUND PINCHED r .•y, r.y.l,- T "M PT - PONT OF TANG04CY ALUM - ' PAVEMENT 1 _ . 1 . ASPHALT MASS ENCLOSURE • FENCE y19t. FLOOD ! 1 �BUILDING .GH. WATER LINE +7 T7 yE BILK BLOCK CK INVERT LB LAND SLIRMINO BUZESS ' ES RESIDENCE RL - RADIAL ME EM BENCH MM .ry BOUNDARY LFE LOWEST 11• M .L V!: !`I!1 L40 * r" ERG WRE FENCE LS LAND v ' /: RNG = RANGE R . RAL .y.l SPIKE _ CALCULATED M ., MEASURE) '. CONCRETE M.00K STRUCTURE 1 = UMM 7U "J r;; I SCM - SET CONCIZETE MONUMENT S/E - mma ! y lm air CIOD CL - CENTERIM 1 r LE MHWL - MEAN HIGH WATER ME SEC - SECTION CIF - CHAIN LINK FENCE USE. - MEAN SEA LEVEL SET .•1 - SET NAL ARNAD) 1 S%K ; kLy • ySR it :1 ... ` 'f '.y:I ' Yy' - COLUMN & - i ti DISK ry SQUARE 'I FENCE CONC - CONCRETE Y.r yl r ..1. �.t 1 • 1 y l +ry,. VERTICAL DATUM ROAD r OVERALL ` .1 .1.... yy• CORNER :1 - COVERED AREA on 1.7•. 1 Mole. . 1 - 1.77) OR 1 "Y Yr �I ' , i DOT - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION O/S - OFFSET TBM - TEMPORARY BENCH MARK 1. 1,` :ry: TOB 1,, OF �`, EL OR ELEV = ELEVATION 'i NIT OF y 1.. OF a r "E ECP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT PCC - PONT OF COMMID CURVE TRANS - TRANSFDRMTR ED'# - EDGE OF WATER POP - PERMANENT CONTROL POINT TYP - TOWNW C - FOUND CONCRETE UONUWNT PARKER ON UG = UNDERGROUND FES - FLARED END SECTION Pi. - PROPERTY LINE UTIL - UlM FIP - FOUND VZON PIPE POD - POINT OF EEGIMG WD - WOOD FIR - FOUND IROR ROD POC - POiNT OF COMMENCEMENT V - WOOD FENCE +. .. . � .r POINT ON v r IRON FENCE .1 El rr .r.., ,1.' WITNESS END - FOUND PRC - PONT OF REVERSE CURVATURE FOUND OPEN PIPE I PERMANENT h7 ! 7 y r ii !. VALVE FLORIDA PURR OR . us OM COMMONLY RECOGN17ED AND /OR ACCEPTED ABBREVIATIONS ARE ALSO LlTlUZED BUT NOT SPECIFIED HEREW -r c S EX§NG W d TY EASEMENT .t wP A % V 591 6' 4 g .m^ - b4 d" �pyn 8 628- @ F R R 6' R FULL G IPLINE EXISTING TREE 2/3 DRIPLINE SECTION 7, TWP. 29 S., RNG. 16 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA I 59 59 PR 2 "X" SQ. ��,�_ —, 1 %flYRPR A4 r — BPT!'P1 y r r HAND PRUNING OF ROOTS TREE APPRAISAL NUMBER 44' MITI i ,R .k. IIMI�I�IIFIIIIIII � �r Ili , t"1�� Sheet: +w 1 44' MITI i ,R .k. IIMI�I�IIFIIIIIII � �r Ili , t"1�� Sheet: FIR 5/6' 1762 a22'K; 0.09 ' W. OF FCW STORM SEWER MANHOLE K RM GA- 57,56 K W EL- 5C66 W RASC PTE) VICINITY MAP nU A 017 1/17V (w wfw EXISTING 10' UTILITY EASEMENT--,, A EXISTING 10' UTILITY EASEM�NT—\ SECTION 7, T11'P. 29 S., R_1'G. 16 F,., PLITLLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ..... ............ .......... .. GRAPHIC SCALI 1 inch = 30 ft. N001 NOO*24'36"E Ll wl I1"M wr4piklm (SEE DETAIL) ros I Zym ,&17* 20® Ca _j ck� Ca C5 L E G EN D Em, �w. i S5C30'40"W 20.03' S22'03'OCE 4 S22'OSOTJE 15,95' 3 S26*32'5'Ej 2' 17.19' S35*55'49"r 4.01' (389.67 SQ. FT. M,OLl S00*22'14"W 45.04' DETAIL OF UTILITIES AT SITE'S S.E. CORNER SCALE: 1" = 10' O 65' CURB L SIR----- N8922,51,w Co APPLICANT: DREW PARK, LLC Lij Lu ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES LEGEND LEGEND 60 v) EXISTING SITE / DEMOLITIOM PLAN SHEET 2 3281 LANDMARK DR. CLEARWATER, FHONE: 727-772-1776 FL 33761 & 55' SILTATION GRADE SILTATION SCREEN COORDINATE GEOMETRY PLAN SHEET 3 P / N_� 11 "o CL Cl- LEGAL DESCRIPTION 11 x ®- JOB NUMBER: D A TE'.. "' FAX: 727-772-0095 OWNER'S REPRESENTITIVE: EMERSON ATKINSON 0 THE ATKINSON COMPANY 3403 CYPRESS HEAD COURT o 13,0. TAMPA, FL 33618 PHONE: 813-789-9548 —37,0'— FAX: 813-961-7591 PROJECT SITE ENGINEER: GALEN J. HOFMANN, P.E. o C.O. 8620 AIRWAY BLVD. ------ 0 NEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34654 PHONE: 727-844-7686 PROJECT ENGINEER: J.J. SOSA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. LJ. 5811 MEMORIAL HWY., SUITE 207 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLANDS TAMPA, FL 336155000 STOP SIGN PHONE: 813-888-6525 EXT. 212 SURVEYOR: GEORGE A. SHIMP ii AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 3301 DeSOTO BLVD., SUITE D PALM HARBOR, FL 34683 PHONE: 727-784-5496 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 11 x ®- JOB NUMBER: D A TE'.. "' PROPOSED HYDRANT ASSEMBLY PROPOSED WATER METER 0 PROPOSED BACK FLOW PREVENTER PROPOSED GATE VALVE o 13,0. PROPOSED BLOW OFF PROPOSED REDUCER —37,0'— EXISTING ELEVATION 0 PROPOSED MANHOLE o C.O. PROPOSED CLOSE OUT ------ 0 PROPOSED STUB PROPOSED 4' OR 6' CONCRETE SPILLWAY Ell ROCK OR SAND-CEMENT LJ. RIP- RAP IC o N INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLANDS -0- STOP SIGN VELOCITY DISSIPATOR BLOCK PAVING LEGAL DESCRIPTION 11 x ®- JOB NUMBER: D A TE'.. "' PHASE LINE 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE H,C. &1 HANDICAPPED SPACE 12.0' X 19.0' DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW UTILITY EASEMENT —37,0'— EXISTING ELEVATION RETAINING WALL ------ 0 JURIS11CTIONAL LINE 25' UPLAND BUFFER LINE LJ. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLANDS -0- STOP SIGN LEGAL DESCRIPTION 11 x ®- JOB NUMBER: D A TE'.. "' 2/1 SLOPE BOT = = 410' SECTION 7, TWP* 29 ®S RNG* 16 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA TOO 46V 4x 35 8'XI6' CONC. BLOCK T7AWLlNK7EffT ' — ' — ' —' —' -T'C-HW N N ff—' NOTES: ' CEMENTED IN PLACE TYPE C�109.0 TYPE C TO! TYPE B FE= 51.75' N4/1 4/9 5a0' TYPE A BUZOING 7:1 71' 2364 DREW STREET ---LINE ---T--DIRECTION -7--DISTANCE -- r ' NOTE: —NR —00-2—V—1 UPLAND BUFFER REQUIERED 1,376.7 S.F. L E G E N D Li )3 32 W/ USE OF STANDARD 2V BUFFER ]0�0-24�36*E�3�&12�14 x POWER POLE UPLAND BUFFER PROVIDED 1,48&8 S.F. o W I n 0 W1 PROPOSED 35-20' BUFFER I w"r m nw r HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1 " =20' WITH - F. , D.O.T. - INDEX , , No, - 5 , 1 , 5 G-17 Burl ix/ 11 LO U) L EGEN D LEGEN D cn 6 cf) I 00 U-) -1 < 11 49 - P"� GRADE --cb� _�jll-TATIQN -SCREEN CL- CL z ui 0 Z) Ll- LL- PROPOSE H AASEMBLY P OSEb H ASEMBLY PHASE LINE Lij 0 0 z LJ M Z z 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE L Li LLJ p6 Lol 0 2 cy- 0 Of LL 0 0 =) 0 PROPOSE PROPOSE WA ME H.C. HANDICAPPED SPACE &F V) 111 < 0.- uj M 0 Li PROPOSED ACK FLOW P 3ED ACK FLOW P EVENTER EVENTER 12.0' X 19.0' cr- -i Li a- z < 0 0 (n IL 0 V) 0 OS GA L PROPOS GA L DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW V) (-4jl z Li Li m 0 W IL z Li 0 B.O. PROPOSE BL"--E�r7r 3 UTILITY EASEMENT CD 10, PROPOSEb RE ELEVATION 0 POS E P P ROPOS M ANHO 37�0'— —° EXISTING 59 59 0 C.O. -V�UT RETAINING WALL PR PROPOSE) CLO ELL I PROPOSE STUB ------ 0 JURISTICTIONAL LINE 57 PROPOSED 57 PROPOSED 4' OR CONC P LL 4Y 25 UPLAND BUFFER LINE 60.1 0 , 0 MATCH USISTIN G G RADE ROCK OR RIP-RA SAND -EV TYPICAL 1 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLANDS EXISTING ELEVA11ON�'------.— L j- VELOCITY' DISSIPATOR I 5 5 55 LOCK B �ZA�MZNG� 1 -0- STOP SIGN 1 1 OSS CR93) SECTION A ( .0' rlT*Tsj9wmm NOTES: SECTION 'i, TPP. 29 Sol R,;1 C. 16 L'., PINELLaS COUNTY, FLORIDA] "TNE. bl!RECTION DISTANCE-7 Li NOO2121:4'E 38,11 R V= M ::NOO'24'36"E =38.122 m L E G E N D 0 - POWER POLE * - LIGHT POLE nD - STORM SFWFR MH 4a RbaAT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 4F, SOUTH FM- I l iW'SiCFER, SANITARY SEVER ESV'T N RU M.- 4&44 ,A25 &E —6: pi: SIDE OF EXISTING M.H. N 19-A r- O.R. 4135, PG. 508 N. "I �3 -311, �1� VICIP zl�l ollzl� I /I n wv: 'ELL: 4 Fi (APPLICABLE FEES TO BE - - - - - - NZ INV. EL- 4192 (V VCP) PAID BY OWNERS X UK EL- 4110 (ads 44 r-L ---- --------- —PRIVATE 1" METER & 'A i. STORM SEWER MANHOLE BUTOING "A" N, RM M- 57.56 N, W EL- R66 (V PXIIC PIPE) % 2322 DREW STREET 1 -1 f 2" PVC SER�CE LINE j — - - - - - - bl IL To . . . CONNEC 50 46V 58 59 EXISTING M.H.- 4. AW 0 NV= 4131' LJ Lo 2'X2*Xl-1 '2" TEE-' 1� a c� SIR ...... 81 82 5' S/W 106 7 CURB 87 2,xl—1 R UVW. I. EOP I I"N I I I P dqn RF INV=4VAU 41160' '95,130, PYLON PH SE I I ULlfkIL OF UIILIIILJ SIGN 4,750 SF DTI IN "H11 AT SITE'S S.E. CORNER 2 2358 DREW STREE , 100 95 94 88 0.954 85 SCALE: 1" 10' PRIVATE I" METER & PRIVATE 1' METER & 1-1/2' PVC SERVICE LINE 1-1/4" PVC SERVICE 101 160'-3* PVC WATER MAIN IZZ4 I*" 1 0.65' CURB TEE 3'X3'Xl—l/ - TE 3#X2"— 0' ELBO I HANDICAPPED 1-6 1 ! I �lj ON SITE TBM SET NAIL IN P.P. ELEV,= 64,311' WATER TER - MAID ft —kT TAP VALVE CONNECT TO EXISTING 8 CITY�F CLEARWATER TOP M�- 57A.2 D.I.P. WATER MAIN VIA WET TA AND VALVE THROAT EL. 56 62 P0 (AND TWO DOUBLE Ll� � N CP S� Y. EL- 50,42 (IV R) - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - ---z — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - r--) I L-L-i I L-Lj S. BNDY. OF SECTION 7-29-16 u') C/D 1W ""TREET COUNTY ROAD 528 LEGEND 54.48' PROPOSED GRADE o C. 0, PROPOSED CLOSE OUT PROPOSED HYDRANT ASSEMBLY PROPOSED WATER METER H.C. PROPOSED BACK FLOW PREVENTER PROPOSED GATE VALVE o B.C. PROPOSED BLOW OFF PROPOSED REDUCER BLOCK PAVING 0 PROPOSED MANHOLE o C. 0, PROPOSED CLOSE OUT L Eb" E N E 100' R/W Li-i L-Li cn I cn SILTATION SCREEN PROPOSED STUB PROPOSED 4' OR 6' CONCRETE SPILLWAY H.C. ROCK OR SAND-CEMENT RIP -RAP ICAL DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW VELOCITY DISSIPATOR BLOCK PAVING L Eb" E N E 100' R/W Li-i L-Li cn I cn SILTATION SCREEN NOTES: c D b DEC 2 223 t1l L. PHASE LINE 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE H.C. HANDICAPPED SPACE 12.0' X 19.0' DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW UTILITY EASEMENT —37, 0'— EXISTING ELEVATION RETAINING WALL c6 ------ 0 JURISTICTIONAL LINE 25' UPLAND BUFFER LINE 177-7-77"\ INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLANDS_ -0- STOP SIGN NOTES: c D b DEC 2 223 t1l L.