640 CHESTNUT STCITY OF CLEARWATER - ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION
=�. TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION FORM
1432
,q -=
w�
NAME OF OWNER: ((e(� f h 077d 5 Fee Rec. $ 1
Dale Rec: a 3
LOCATION OF WORK: lwz, �rH %� sip r','�,� aN�sv�ru�NOr•'rs Rec. By:
Clearwater, FL Rec't # ./ �-
�-7
REQUIRED REPLACEMENT TREES
......v,....... -. ��w® ��s���s® �® �s�os�a— ���o����a���asw •���r�aaor ®�,._. -..:..
PERMIT TO REMOVE TREE(S) 1.432 c
NAME OF OWNER 6e) A Dm eA 5 REASON FOR REMOVAL:
OWNER'S ADDRESS tf,4.�IN �N- �c►a. ❑Construction
PHONE 5�3 ❑ Hazardous
SITE ADDRESS �o�� rf, t�s� Amt �>'�s /,��{ pDeclining
LOCATION OF TREE(S) ON LOT << ti o p, �7 p Dead
SPECIES AND NUMBER OF TREE(S) 33 2 c n 66 ti aA /.ter 0 Other (Specify)
TO APPLICANT: A non - refundable fee of $15.00 for up to five trees to
be removed, plus $3.00 for every tree above 5 to be
removed is required.
Fee Rec'd. $
Receipt # _
Date
1. For new construction, additions or other modifications of a property which Involve the removal of a protected tree(s),
a site plan Is required. This site plan must have a minimum scale of V =20' for single family lots, or 1' =50' for all others. The
site plan must Include:
a. Major Changes of Grade 1. All easements and Rights -of- Way,,,
b. Structure Locations J. All Protected Trees Including:
C, Driveways and Walks (I;) Diameter of 4.5' above grade (DBH)
d. Parking Arrangement (ii.) Surveyed Location
e. Required Number of Parking Spaces (iii.) Species `q /
f. Proposed Number of Parking Spaces (iv.) Diseased or Insect Infested Trees `V
g. Proposed Underground Utilities (v.) Trees to be Removed
h. Zoning Setbacks k. Tree Barricade Datall & locations
2. Protective barriers are required around all trees remaining on site during construction. These barricades must remain
Intact during construction. The barriers must meet City Specifications.
3. Tree replacement minimum standards: 8' overall height, 2' caliper, Florida Grade 11. See Inspectors note below to
determine the number of replacement trees required:
I hereby certify that as property owner or as representative of the property owner, I have verified that the tree(s) sought
to be removed Is wholly on property owned by the above- identified property owner, and should it be determined that
the tree(s) are located wholly or partially on property owned by some other person, then, 1. agree to hold the City of
Clearwater harmless in any claim made for wrongful removal of such tree(s). I hereby certify that this application to-
gether with any plans submitted is a true representation of all facts concerning the,proposed removal of the tree(s). Any
deviation from the permit issued shall render it null and void and be considered a violation of Chapter 52, Code of
Ordinanc
-�seu—G�
Signature of owner or applicant Printed Name
//N 9j /o 5i-
Address Agency Representing (If Not Owner)
City State Zip Phone
Applicable Code Section:
Inspector
Based on the Inspector's comments arid Information sub7nitted, the above removal application is:
p Approved as Submitted proved- Modified as Noted Above p Denied
Signed: Date:
City Manager or Designee
1362.0001 -GC
&94
APPLICATION FOR LAND CLEARING & GRUBBING PERMIT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DATE 2 /Ae/I �D
(813) 462 -6747 RECEIPT NO. -�
gad
A non - refundable filing fee of $ 10.00 is required. Permit applicable for 6 months from date of approval.
In accordance with Section 50.22,1 hereby apply for permit to land clear and /or grub the property described below.
1. Location of Property: 640 Chestnut Stropt
2. Project Name: Demolition
3. Purpose of clearing and /orvubbing: ❑ New Construction M Demolition D Tank Removal 0 Other
4. General description of existing vegetation, topography, and surface water (including all existing and /or pro-
posed ditches, canals, and swales)
5. Proposed method of debris disposal W4.0 nff -
6. Date you plan to begin work Dec. 23, 1996
7. Proposed method of soil erosion control
8. 9�-No -Tree Verification Required O Tree Removal Permit Required
I AM AWARE AND UNDERSTAND THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 52.08, CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING
TREE PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SEC11ON 50.43 REGARDING EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL.
sigKC -M of Owner or Owners Representative
Roy Grimes
Printed Name
Address
Largo F14 3 /i3
City state zip
Sonny Glasbrenner, Inc. 536 -6607
Representatives' Firm Telephone
Applicant must include Aerial Photograph or Scaled Drawing showing property boundaries and limits of work. This is
NOT a Tree Removal Permit.
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE_
Comments /puP t� �tir� °� ��' h /!1` 74 c
Environmental Inspector Date
Comments / ✓B� r� c�C� a ���' �jF:nts, i�.
Urban Forester
Based on the above comments and information submitted, the above clearing & grubbing application is:
z -17 -94
Date
roved As Submitted D Approved - Modified As Noted Above ❑ Denied
Signed: Date.
Citv Mrfnno?r or Desionee
APPLICATION FOR LAND CLEARING & GRUBBING PERMIT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
(813) 462 -6747
DATE 2 ��
RECEIPT NO. g
A non - refundable filing fee of $ 10.00 Is required. Permit applicable for 6 months from date of approval.
In accordance with Section 50.22,1 hereby apply for permit to land clear and /or grub the property described below.
1. Location of Property: 642 Chestnut Street
2. Project Name: Demolition
3. Purpose of clearing and /or grubbing: u New Construction YC) Demolition u Tank Removal u Other
4. General description of existing vegetation, topography, and surface water (including all existing and /or pro-
posed ditches, canals, and swales) rraSS Dirt, Ftr
5. Proposed method of debris disposal
Haul Off
b. Date you plan to begin work npce rte? gg6
7. Proposed method of soil erosion control
8. %�No -Tree Verification Required u Tree Removal Permit Required
I AM AWARE AND UNDERSTAND THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 52.08, CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING
TREE PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SECTION 50.43 REGARDING EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL.
Sidin--ai6e of Owne7r or Owners Representative
Roy Grimes
Printed Name
6409 123rd Avenue N.
Address
Largo, Fl. 33773
City state Zip
Sonny Glasbrenner, Inc. 536 -6607
Representatives' Firm Telephone
Applicant must include Aerial Photograph or Scaled Drawing showing property boundaries and limits of work. 'This is
NOT a Tree Removal Permit.
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
Comments
Comments
P',S
/Z -1 7 ?16
Environmental Inspector Date
Urban Forester Date
Based on the above comments and information submitted, the above clearing & grubbing application is:
pproved As Submitted u Approved - Modified As Noted Above u Denied
Signed. Date:
City Manager or Designee
el, _ : -R.
Albee, Rick
From: Quillen, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 1998 3:12 PM
To: Albee, Rick
Subject: FW: Eng. approvals.....
Rick F.Y.I. No action required. Interesting?
From:
Perkins, Robert
Sent:
Wednesday, March 26,1008 12:52 PM
To:
Kronschnabl, Jeff
Cc:
Chodora, Vic; Doherty, Steve; Glatthorn, Sandra; Baier, Richard; Quillen, Michael
Subject:
RE: Eng. approvals.....
We have never received any engineered drawings showing drainage concerns. After reviewing plans from
Architect, it is still unclear as to grades, elevations, outfalls, swales, retention volumes, etc. Another issue appears
to be the use of existing shell parking /driveway, which you may have already addressed with Rich. I have relayed
these comments to Vic and also discussed at BPRC this morning with members, as well as, Sandy and Steve. I
believe the consensus was to approve the Park in phases to allow for the immediate construction of the
monument. This approval should not include the compactor as I will need to further discuss this item with the Solid
Waste Department. Thanks.... Bob
Just as a note, I feel this item is another project that should have been presented to the BPRC. Thanks for your
consideration.
From:
Kronschnabl, Jeff
Sent:
Tuesday, March 24, 1998 5:01 PM
To:
Perkins, Robert; Glatthorn, Sandra
Cc:
Doherty, Steve; Chodora, Vic
Subject:
RE: Eng. approvals.....
I was stopped at a meeting last night after we agreed to complete Mr. Thomas construction permit and his
contractor was again refused...... Why..... and is this now corrected?
From: Glatthorn, Sandra
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 1998 1:25 PM
To: Perkins, Robert
Cc: Doherty, Steve; Kronschnabl, Jeff; Chodora, Vic
Subject: FW: Eng. approvals.....
Bob: Steve says that you have been coordinating this project for Eng. Would you please find out exactly
what Mike wants, then call the contractor to get them permitted. I am told that Fred Thomas has sent his
contractor in on 2 occasions now to get his permit. He needs to at least be able to go forward with the
Freedom Park.
Let me know how it works out. Thanks.
S"4
From: Chodora, Vic
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 1998 11:12 AM
To: Kronschnabl, Jeff; Glatthorn, Sandra
Cc: Doherty, Steve
Subject: RE: Eng. approvals.....
I talked to Mike Gust, and he said that for Freedom Square, he needs the following:
• South driveway needs signage indicating left turn only, and stop sign. The site
sign may have to be relocated.
• North driveway needs to be more defined as a driveway and properly sized.
A, • Need a three foot buffer from the parking spaces and the East Ave. ROW.
v�
Page 1
�l
458?
From: Glatthorn, Sandra
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 1998 10:44 AM
To: Kronschnabl, Jeff
Cc: Chodora, Vic; Doherty, Steve
Subject: Eng. approvals.....
Vic mentioned to Steve D. and me this morning about a few projects which have gone through the
planning stages for months with the understanding from Eng. that everything is ok as planned and
then when these folks come in for permits /co's, Eng. has put a hold on the plans and requires
something different. This is not good - maybe it is a communication problem between a few staff
members in Eng.
Two sites in particular right now are: Fred Thomas' parking lot behind the train station and Marcus
Vernon's Oakbrook Subdivision on Landmark Dr. Steve D. has just checked with Bob Maran on these
two. Apparently Mike Gust put a hold on the Thomas parking lot, now Bob M. says it was discussed
at their staff meeting this morning and it has been approved.
Regarding the Oakbrook Sub., Bob Maran is working with the contractor., Marshal of Ryland Homes,
to straighten out a current drainage problem because Ryland Homes brought in a lot of soil and it
exceeded their capability to control runoff of sediments. The CM's office may get a call from
neighbors complaining about Ryland Homes. I have asked Bob M. to call Denise to alert them about
this.
Another item: Pools in easements. Steve D. will be sending you an e-mail on this issue. Some years
back, Eng. said they wanted Zoning to look closely at these and if the pools were close to easements
to check with Eng. for signoffs. And if they were in existence prior to 1985 (enactment of the LDC) ,
then they would go forward for vacation of that portion of the easement.
This is something to consider in discussing getting Eng. staff in our dept.
S"4
Page 2
Albee, Rick
From:
Quillen, Michael
Sent:
Friday, April 17, 1998 11:54 AM
To:
Garriott, Kevin; Doherty, Steve
Cc:
Albee, Rick; Dussault, Earl; Gust, Mike; Perkins, Robert
Subject:
RE: freedom park
The landscape buffer along East Avenue is still not acceptable, as a 5' average width is not provided. We see no
reason why the spaces can not be shifted west to provide the required 5'. This would also alleviate Steve's last
concern described below. M.Q.
From: Doherty, Steve
Sent: Friday, April 17, 1998 11:44 AM
To: Garriott, Kevin
Cc: Albee, Rick; Dussault, Earl; Gust, Mike; McCarky, Don; Perkins, Robert; Quillen, Michael
Subject: RE: freedom park
Here's my comments:
1. Landscaping Buffer between development and East Ave. - A minimum width of 3 ft. is required at any one
point. Avg. width required is 5 ft.
2. Monument wall relocation. No problem.
3. Proposed Restrooms. Looks fine; only note is that any building overhanging a street r.o.w. cannot extend
closer than 5 ft. from curbline and min. 9 ft. vertical clearance is req'd.
4. Compactor enclosure. Wall to be built around dumpster excepting monument wall needs approval of a
variance from DCAB. According to Legal, DRB may not review as this is not to be regarded as a structure. I
discussed this with Carl Struthers w /Audi -Shand and Williams. He is aware that the next deadline to file
variance is 4/22 for 5/28 DCAB. Bob may push for 5/24 DCAB and I am checking with John Richter in advance
to see if that would be a problem.
5. Monument Wall Design. No problem. This is regarded as a structure so height o.k.
Kevin, please also pass along my concern that the parking aisle north of unpaved parking lot is not aligned
with aisle serving unpaved spaces. Northerly most parking space in unpaved lot interferes with traffic flow and
does not have 24 ft. aisle required. Suggest elimination of this parking space and that landscaping be provided
instead to more properly direct traffic. Carl agreed and also said that this might be a good area to provide for
improved public pedestrian accessway to trail.
From: Garriott, Kevin
Sent: Friday, April 17, 1998 10:10 AM
To: Albee, Rick; Devers, Gert; Don McCarty; Dussault, Earl; Jeffrey Daniels; Mike Gust; Robert Guercia; Robert Perkins;
Stephen Sarnoff; Steve Doherty; Udoh, Etim; Vic Chodora
Subject: freedom park
I have received no comments from anyone.
I will relay to architect that all is well as shown. And permit is available.
Page 1
—FSW—FVi MD permit:
2. Submit a landscape plan showing req'd ?' min. 5' average buffers adjacent
to all rights -of way and required plant material, adjacent zonings, vehicle
use area in sq.ft., 6% interior landscape islands, irrigation, legal
description, owners name, address and phone.
3. Clearing and grubbing permit
�z
�Tfc'
. 'ey
�G
c�
1. SWFWMD permit.
2. Submit a landscape plan showing req'd 3' min. 5' average buffers adjacent
to all rights -of way and required plant material, adjacent zonings, vehicle
use area in sq.ft., 6% interior landscape islands, irrigation, legal
description, owners name, address and phone.
3. Clearing and grubbing permit
Dn A t, �<
VTO
+— Praiva.ge -cabs -and SWFWMD permit.
2. Submit &-e�/landscape plan showing req'd 5' buffers and required plant
;material, adjacent zonings, vehicle use area in sq.ft., irrigation, legal
;description, owners name, address and phone,
Helier, and s.
3. Clearing and grubbing permit
6 XO
'4TE?
CENTRAL PERMrmNG DEPARTMENT
ApA120, 1009
Mr. Robert J. Aude
Aude, Shand, & Williams, Inc.
19353 U.S. Highway North - Suite 101
Clearwater, FL 33764
Proposed Freedom Park A -063820
Dear Bob:
I
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIIDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AvENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33'56
TELEPHONE (813) 562 -4567
The following is a listing of comments that have come back to me in response to your latest plans, submitted 4/10/98, for this project.
Landscaping Buffer:
Buller between development and East Avenue - a minimum width of 3' is required at any one point with and average of 5'.
Monument Wall:
No concerns over relocated monument wall location.
Proposed Restrooms:
Note: any building overhanging a street right -of -way cannot extend closer than 5 feet from curb and 9' minimum vertical clearance is
required.
Compactor Enclosure:
Wall to be built around dumpster (except monument wall) will require a variance from DCAB to be installed as shown. City of
Clearwater attorneys have stated that Design Review Board has no authority and this is not be regarded as a structure.
Next deadline to apply for variance is 422/98. This will receive a hearing on 528/98 if applied for by422.
Monument Wall Design:
No concerns.
Traffic engineering is not able to approve the unpaved parking surface. They state that although zoning may not require the parking,
installation of parking spaces without paving must have the City Engineer's approval. 'Ile City Engineer has not given that approval.
We do not have any comments on any of the site work that Florida Design Consultants will provide engineering on.
Please feel free to contact any of our staff with design questions you may have. I may be reached at 5624588.
Sincerely,
Kevin. 'ott f
Central Permitting Supervisor
EQUAL E.MPLO) MENT A:tiD AFFIRMAms ACTION EMPLOYER"
.Art E.trr,ti Oppertumty btlikver
James L Allen
Chairman, Bushnell
James E. Martin
Vice Chairman. St. Petersburg
Sally Thompson
Secretary. Tampa
Ronald C. Johnson
Treasurer, Lake Wales
Ramon F. Campo
Brandon
Joe L. Davis, Jr.
Wauchula
Pamela Jo Davis
Largo
Rebecca M. Eger
Sarasota
John P. Harllee, IV
Bradenton
Curtis L Law
Land C* Lakes
Brenda Menendez
Tampa
E. D. "Sonny" Vergara
Executive Director
Gene A. Heath
Assistant Executive Director
Edward B. Helvenston
General Counsel
Excellelice
Throu;lt
Qu llittl
�,, r t I it' ;�
Southwest Florida
Water Management District
2379 Broad Street • Brooksville, Florida 34609 -6899 • 1 -800- 423 -1476 (Florida Only)
or (352) 796 -7211 • SUNCOM 628 -4150 • T.D.D. Number Only (Florida Only): 1- 800 -231 -6103
Internet address: http : / /www.dep.state.fl.us /swfwmd
7 cC' = ighwey 301 North
170 Century Boulevard
115 Corporaticn Wcy
2303 Highway 44 West
icccc. Florida 33637 -6759
Bartow, Florida 33830.7100 -
Venice. Ronde 34292.3424
Inverness, Florida 34453 -3809
I -KC -036 -0791 or (813) 985 -7481
1. 800. 492. 1862 or (941) 534.1448
1.800 -320 -3503 or (941) 486 -1212
(352) 637 -1360
'Vi. -COM 578.2070
SUNCOM 572 6200
SUNCCM 526.60M
SUNCOM 667 -3271
April 21, 1998
Fred Thomas
Pinch - A- Penny, Inc.
14480 62nd Street North
Clearwater, FL 34620
Subject: Project Evaluation/Permit Not Required
Project Name: Freedom Park
Inquiry Number: 42764
County: Pinellas
Sec/Twp/Rge: 15/29S/ 15E
Latitude /Longitude: 27 057'40.98 " /82 047'49.33"
Reference: Chapter 40D- 4.041, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.)
Dear Mr. Thomas:
The District has reviewed information received on April 10, 1998, for the project referenced above
to determine if the activities proposed are regulated by District rules. Based on the information you
provided and the statutes and rules in effect at the time of this determination, the District has
concluded that an Environmental Resource Permit will not be required for the 5,200 sf of building
and sidewalk. Plans and information submitted will be kept on file in the Tampa Service Office in
support of this decision.
This notification to you does not mean that the District has determined that your project is
permanently exempt from permitting requirements nor does it relieve you of the responsibility of
obtaining other permits or approvals (federal, state or local) that may be required for the project.
This determination may not be valid in the event future changes occur in the applicable statutes or
rules. Additionally, project modifications may necessitate further evaluation or permitting by the
District. Therefore, you are advised to contact the District before beginning any work which is not
specifically described in your submittal.
The District's notice of its determination that your project qualifies as an exempt activity constitutes
final agency action by the District. You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by
the District's determination regarding your project may request an administrative hearing in
accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes (F.S.) and Part V of Chapter 40D -1,
F.A.C. A reciuest for hearing must (1) state anv disputed issues of material fact: (2) explain how
each petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the District's action: and (3) otherwise
comply with Rule 40D- 1.521, F.A.C. A request for hearing must be filed with and received by the
Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Brooksville address within 14 days of receipt of this
notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the
United States mail. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a
waiver of any right such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57
F. S.
Pinch - A- Penny, Inc.
Page 2
April 21, 1998
Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., of any administrative dispute regarding the District's determination
in this matter is not available.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please contact Richard M. Alt, P.E., at the Tampa Service
Office, extension 2045. Please reference the Project Name and Inquiry Number in future communications
concerning this project.
Sincerely,
Alba E. Mds, P.E.
Director
Tampa Regulation Department
AEM:dsw
cc: Inquiry No. 42764
Richard D. Harris, P.E., Florida Design Consultants, Inc.
FREEDOM PARK
EAST AVENUE & CHESTNUT STREET
QAFREEDOM PARK COVER
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
APRIL 16,1998
PROJECT NO. 999-36
lu • c
PINCH -A- PENNY, INC.
1448062 ND STREET NORTH
CLEARWATER, FL 33760
W. � .
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS,, INC.
2639 McCORMICK DRIVE
CLEARWATER, FL 33759
}
{rte e� 9t
�� i
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS
2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759
Tel, (813) 724 -8422 - Fax, (813)724 -8606
job no. y
��
description yL 3/
computed by 2�Clf date
sheet / of 3 checked by date
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS a PLANNERS
2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759
Tel (813) 724 -8422 - Fax, (813)724 -8606
job no.
description computed by ���date
/5�� c e io sheet 2 of I checked by date
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS
2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759
G Tel, (813) 724 -8422 - Fax, (813)724 -8606
job no. / ?
description
computed by ��date
-sheet--' of 3 checked by date
N
POLLUTION ABATEMENT VOLUME ANALYSIS
USING 'MODRET 4' PROGRAM
Written by: Nicolas E. Andreyev,P.E. (May, 1992)
( Sponsored by: SWFWMD /PSI )
SUMMARY OF INPUT PARAMETERS
POND NAME / NUMBER : FREEDOM PARK
-------------- - - - - --
AVERAGE WETTED POND LENGTH _ _____________________> 120.000 ft
AVERAGE
WETTED POND WIDTH _ ______________________>
6.500
ft
AVERAGE
ELEVATION OF BOTTOM OF AQUIFER = _________>
19.200
ft
AVERAGE
ELEVATION OF DESIGN GROUNDWATER TABLE ___>
21.700
ft
AVERAGE
ELEVATION OF POND BOTTOM _ _______________>
23.750
ft
AVERAGE
HORIZONTAL HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY = ______>
14.000
ft /d
AVERAGE
EFFECTIVE STORAGE COEFF. OF SOIL = _______>
0.200
AVERAGE
STORAGE COEFFICIENT OF POND AREA = _______>
1.000
POLLUTION ABATEMENT VOLUME TO BE TREATED = _______>
0.021
ac -ft
TIME INCREMENTS AFTER STORM EVENT _ ______________> 12.00 hours
No. OF
TIME INCREMENTS
AFTER STORM EVENT = _______>
6.00
NUMBER
OF GROUNDWATER
CONTROL FEATURES = _________>
0.00
SUMMARY OF POLLUTION ABATEMENT MODEL RESULTS
POND NAME / No.: FREEDOM PARK
---------- - - - - --
CUMULATIVE
WATER
INSTANTANEOUS
AVERAGE
TIME
ELEVATION
INFILTRATION
INFILTRATION
(hrs. )
---- - - - - --
(feet)
----- - - - - --
RATE (cfs)
------- - - - - --
RATE (cfs)
------ - - - - --
0.000
24.914
0.032
0.0237
12.000
23.602
0.016
0.0074
24.000
23.190
0.006
0.0042
36.000
22.960
0.003
0.0028
48.000
22.805
0.002
0.0021
60.000
22.689
0.002
0.0016
72.000
22.602
* This value (with associated time) is an equivalent instantaneous
infiltration rate 'to be used with a stormwater routing model
( such as ADICPR or others ). Just before this time, the
infiltration is zero (prior to runoff reaching the pond).
DATE: April 1, 1998
T0: Mr. Richard Harris, P.E.
Florida Design Consultants
2639 McCormick Drive
Clearwater, Florida 34619
RE: Geotechnical Engineering Services
Proposed Freedom Park Development
Chestnut Street
Clearwater, Florida
Dear Mr. Harris:
In accordance with your request, we have completed the
geotechnical study for the above referenced project. This letter
report summarizes the results of our field testing, and presents
our geotechnical engineering evaluations and recommendations.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Based on our review of the site plan you provided, the proposed
project consists of the design of the infrastructure for a public
park including access drives and retention areas. One (1}
retention area is planned as part of the development.
Project Approach
The objective of our geotechnical study for the proposed project
was to obtain information concerning the subsurface conditions over
the site in general in order to make geotechnical engineering
estimates and recommendations in each of the following areas:
13555 Automobile Boulevard ■ Suite 510 4270 L.B. McLeod Road
Clearwater, FL 33762 Orlando, FL 32811
(813) 573 -1986 ■ Fax (813) 573 -2295 (407) 841 -0005 ■ Fax (407) 841 -0075
Foundation Soils Study
Proposed Freedom Park Development
Clearwater, Florida
Page 2
1. Soil stratigraphy at the boring locations and the
development of the approximate soil profile within the
depths of the auger borings conducted.
2. General location and description of potentially
deleterious materials which may interfere with
construction progress, including buried or surf icial
existing fills, organics, construction debris, etc.
3. Identification of some critical design or construction
details, including present groundwater levels, estimated
wet season levels, and seasonal fluctuations in the
walkway pavement and retention areas.
PROJECT SCOPE
The objective of our geotechnical study was to.obtain shallow
subsurface data over the site in general, in order to provide
geotechnical engineering evaluations and recommendations for the
project. The following summarizes the scope of our work:
1. Performed a series of shallow hand auger borings to
depths of 5 feet each along the proposed walkway. Soil
samples were classified using the Unified Soil
Classification Systems..
2. Measured the shallow groundwater levels at the auger
boring locations. Normal wet season high groundwater
levels over the site and the potential groundwater
impacts were estimated considering available soils data.
Foundation Soils Study
Proposed Freedom Park Development
Clearwater, Florida
Page 3
3. Evaluated the presence of potentially deleterious
materials which may interfere with construction progress,
including surficial or buried fills, organics, etc.
4. Developed geotechnical engineering evaluations and
recommendations; including normal wet season high
groundwater level estimates.
Existing Site Conditions
The site is currently undeveloped. The site consists of grass
lands with scattered oak trees. The site grade is relatively
level. The site is bounded on the south by Chestnut Street.
The USGS topographic survey was reviewed for the site. The site is
found on the map entitled "Clearwater, Florida." From this review,
the natural ground surface elevation for the site is approximately
+25 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929. The USGS Map is
included on Plate No. 1.
Subsurface Soil Conditions
Based upon a review of the "Soil Survey of Pinellas County Area,
Florida ", published by the USDA SCS, Urban land is the dominant
soil type for this site. The USDA soil map for this site is shown
in Plate No. 2. Due to the site specific nature of Urban Type
land, no information is given in the survey.
Foundation Soils Study
Proposed Freedom Park Development
Clearwater, Florida
Page 4
FIELD EXPLORATION PROGRAM
For our geotechnical study, four (4) shallow hand auger borings
were conducted along the proposed walkway. The boring locations are
indicated on Plate 3. The borings were conducted to depths of
between 5 and 5.5 feet each. The results of our auger borings are
included on Plate 4. Soil samples from each auger boring were
collected and visually classified in the laboratory using the
Unified Soil Classification Systems.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Generalized Soil Stratigraphy
The results of our field work, including the stratification
profiles and pertinent exploration information, are summarized on
Plate 4. A legend describing the different soil types encountered
is included on Plate 5. Soil stratification was based on the
review of recovered soil samples and interpretation of field boring
logs by a geotechnical engineer. The stratification lines
represent the approximate boundaries between soil types as the
actual transition may be gradual. Small variations not considered
important to our engineering analysis may have been abbreviated or
omitted for clarity.
In general, all of the shallow auger borings encountered gray and
brown fine sands to slightly silty fine sands (Strata 1, 2 and 3)
to depths of 5.5 feet.
The shallow groundwater levels were measured.in all of our borings
performed for this study after a brief stabilization period. In
general, the groundwater level was measured at about 3.0 to 3.5
Foundation Soils Study
Proposed Freedom Park Development
Clearwater, Florida
Page 5
feet deep at the time of our field work. Based on this and our
review of the SCS soil survey, we estimate that the seasonal high
groundwater level at this site would be about 3.0 feet below
existing grade. The shallow groundwater level should be expected
to vary during wet seasons and heavy rainfall events.
etention Area Testin
As part of our geotechnical study, a single boring was conducted in
the proposed retention area. This boring was found to contain fine
sands to slightly silty fine sands (Strata 1 through 3) to .a depth
of 5.5 feet below the existing surface.
For our retention area testing, we also conducted borehole falling
head permeability test in a shallow piezometer installed in the
proposed retention area. The piezometer was installed by first
drilling a hole to the desired depth using augers with a 3 -inch
diameter. The piezometer was constructed of 2 -inch dia. SCH 40 PVC
pipe and .010 -inch slotted screen.
The piezometer was surcharged for a period of 5 minutes prior to
testing to saturate the surrounding soils. Then a falling head
test was conducted which consisted of filling the piezometer up to
the top of the pipe and then measuring the rate of fall for several
0.25 -foot intervals. This procedure was repeated several times to
ensure consistent results. The results were then calculated and an
average horizontal permeability value was derived using the formula
given on the following page:
Foundation Soils Study
Proposed Freedom Park Development
Clearwater, Florida
Page 6
K= d2 Ln (Hl4H2)
(2Hi +2H2 +4Ds +d) (t2 -tl )
K = Hydraulic conductivity (CFS /Ft.2 -Ft. Head)
d = Diameter of test hole (Feet)
H,.= Height of water in hole above water table at
time t, (Feet)
H,= Height of water in hole above water table at
time t, (Feet)
Ds = Saturated Hole Depth (Feet)
tl, t2 = Time (Seconds)
Based on the results of our testing, the average permeability value
for the shallow soils in the retention area was determined to be
about 14 feet per day or 1.62 * 10-4 CFS /Ft.2 -Ft. Head.
Foundation Soils Study
Proposed Freedom Park Development
Clearwater, Florida
Page 7
Closing
Mevers & Associates has appreciated this opportunity to provide you
with our engineering consulting services on this project. If we may
be of further service to you, or if you have any questions
regarding the information contained herein, please do not hesitate
to give us a call.
Sincerely,
MEVERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGLNZERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
Je f y E. Eller, E.I.
P o ct Manager
David A. Mevers, P.E.
President
Attachments: Plates ? through 5
98- G- 1-425.geo
PLATE
li
U S G S QUAD MAP
SCALE: 1:24,000
SOURCE: USGS 7.5 MIN. TOPOGRAPHIC MAP,
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA QUADRANGLE (1987)
SECTION 16/T.29 S. /R.15 E.
PROJECT No. 98 —G -1425
DATE: MARCH 1998
GEOTECHNICAL STUDY
PROPOSED
FREEDOM PARK
PLATE No. 1 I CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
Mevers siaeea &Associate
sa cw gwt=t.
taus lnNUA-M
0
m
0M
®7' I
w
a
d
I
�
Y
o
uj
oil
V)
O2
W
W
00
� W
0
�
W
awe
i
I
I
=
v
M
O
F
V
W
�
2
W
�
VI
t
I
I
2
+ + + I
z
z
j S
t t t t
4 + t +
O
t 4 + t
++
U
wi
0 ®
I
'.R
U1
A
I
LLJ
LL-
z 5
01
HA -1 HA-2
(D
0W.T. 3.0' W.T. 3.0'
N
ri
Ld
Ll-
z 5
We
PROJECT No. 98—G-1425
DATE: MARCH 1998
HA-3
W.T. 3.5'
PB— 1 PB-2
1 5 1
.990
(D (D
(z)W.T. 3.0 W.T. 3.01
...... ......
....... .....
SOIL PROFILES
FOR LEGEND SEE PLATE 5
GEOTECHNICAL STUDY
PROPOSED
FREEDOM PARK
PLATE No. 4 1 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
HA-4
0.T. 3.0'
Mevers &Associate ms
znguummftg cmumat&uu
PAV,�(
y /z3/9�
1. SWFWMD permit.
2. Submit a landscape plan showing req'd 3' min. 5' average buffers adjacent
to all rights -of way and required plant material, adjacent zonings, vehicle
use area in sq.ft., 6% interior landscape islands, irrigation, legal
description, owners name, address and phone.
3. Clearing and grubbing permit
Albee, Rick
From: Garriott, Kevin
Sent: Friday, March 20, 1998 10:30 AM
To: Doherty, Steve; Albee, Rick
Subject: Freedom Park
I have a fax from Bob Aude regarding this project. They would like to get underway and have open by 7/4/98.
I will give you both copies of Bob's response. Please call him and discuss. I think we can do an elimination of
parts of the project that do not meet requirements and add them as they get worked out by plan amendments.
443 -4585.
Thanks.
Page 1
Mar -19 -98 04:43P Aude Shand Williams 813 539 0099 P.02
Freedom Park
Page 2
March 18, 1998
MAR 2 u 1998
CENTRAL PERMITTING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
b. Civil/Landscaping Plan: Florida Design. Consultants will
submit civil engineering data to satisfy this comment. This
drawing will indicate adjacent zoning and area tabulation
of impervious surfaces. It should be noted that the subject
06 was forn'marly occupied by two residential structures
which occupied a greater impervious area than the
proposed Freedom Park development.
C. Clearing and Grubbing Permit: The proposed site was
cleared under a demolition permit issued by the City of
Clearwater which is a matter of record. Since this site is
contiguous to the Pinch -A -Penny store and Clearwater
Train Station, it is possible that the demolition permit was
issued under this file.
3) Zoning Department
Below is a response to five comments issued by the Zoning Department
a. Free Standing Signs: The proposed gateway feature' will
display the words "Freedom Park" to identify the entrance.
As such, the text of the gateway feature is not considered
a commercial sign. Rather it shall be considered a public
use element not subject to sign ordinance. This matter was
discussed with Sandy Glatthom and Steve Doherty during
a meeting in Central Permitting on February 24, 1998.
b Maximum Height for Fences or Walls: The proposed
structure for display for public documents is proposed at
9' -0" in height. In a preliminary discussion with Mr.
Doherty and Ms. Glatthom, the Freedom panels are
proposed as a public monument, not subject to height
requirements of a fence or wall. If the City has changed its
interpretation of this structure, please so advise. However,
material has been ordered at height of 9 feet to be carved
with Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and
the Ten Commandments for public viewing.
Mar -19 -98 04:43P Aude Shand Williams 813 539 0099 P.03
Freedom Park
Page 3
March 18, 1998
C. Parking Spaces and Property Line:
It is our understanding that the City has proposed to
abandon the southbound vehicle lane on East Avenue,
thereby allowing for greater pedestrian access and more
generous landscaping adjacent to the Pinellas County
Trail. Fred Thomas, the property owner, has expressed a
willingness to share the expense of landscaping the
abandoned right-of-way which should provide adequate
buffer between the Pinellas Trail and the eastern boundary
of the parking area. This item was a matter of discussion
during a conference with Central Permitting officials on
February 24, 1998. If the City has withdrawn from a
proposal to abandon subject right -of- -way, please advise
and the plan will be modified to reflect the three foot
limitation.
d. Landscape Buffer: See item c. above
e. Flagpoles: Flagpoles are proposed flanking each side of
the entrance to Freedom Park. Since the entrance feature
is considered a public use element, the flagpole proposal
should also be considered a public use element, not
intended to enhance a commercial oriented retail business.
For this reason, flagpoles should be permitted for the
benefit of the public. Please advise whether this condition
is acceptable subject to public use purpose.
The owner has requested that the City issue a construction permit for this
Freedom Park development, we request this permit be issued listing the
above items as contingencies. The owner intends to make the Park
available in time for the July 41" holiday celebration. Therefore, it is
imperative that the construction work begin immediately Mr. Thomas
understands that all information, as requested, must be submitted prior
to receipt of a Certificate of Occupancy.
0
iv #(�
I
Mar -19 -98 04!43P Aude Shand Williams 813 s39 0099 P -04
Freedom Park
Page 4
March 18,1998
If there are any additional questions or comments, please advise this office
Sincerely,
A D & WILLIAMS, INC., AIA
7
Robert J. Aude, AIA
Principal
RJA:Inh
cc: Fred Thomas - Pinch A Penny Stores, Inc.
Ed Mazur, Richard Harris - Florida Design Consultants
A
Mar -19 -98 04•
March 18, 1997
City of Clearwater
Central Permitting Department
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: Building Permit Application #A -063820
Freedom Park
640 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, FL
Gentlemen:
P.01
In response to comments received by this office on March 5, 1998, we are
pleased to respond to review comments as follows:
1) Building Department
The Building Department requested that footings for the flagpole for
manufacturers installation data be furnished. We attach standard
foundation criteria for the 25 ft. high metal flagpole, as requested.
Precise anchor bolt configuration will be submitted upon selection of e
specific manufacturer.
2) Environmental
Under separate cover, the firm of Florida Design Consultants will
respond to three comments issued by the Environmental Engineering
Department. Subject of these comments are as follows:
a. Drainaae calculations and SWFWMD Permit: Florida
Design Consultants will submit drainage calculations and
exemption letter from SWFWMD to clear this comment.
N.OBtk; J AU4 1. NA #M%9
ARIHOi + S,O NIA IIfiA 000137J9
f$.!t.�.�;;j 5 th1'l b1Mi; r ":�:1 1957 1
AUDE, SHAND & WILLIAMS. INC
AW)k ;: KIK.;r.r Fk I r'Akx
����•:! U.S. Hl4•Y I., ••;,.;r•.�ri. ;urlt ,!::
:.1I/t}N J.A. I I R. Ir ?i: f,4 ::i. 1: '��y <'�iS'. (Al til'91(,t (Y14 1 '.i1 UI1'i1i
PROJECT
LOCATION
LOCATION MAP ---
N.T.S.
SECTION 15 TOWNSHIP 29 S. RANGE 15 E.
CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
VICINITY MAP
CLEARWATER,
PHONE {813)- 531 -8913
PREPARED BYE
FLORIDA 33760
G /Y�,7 / /VCG�'I7 G /YV /i7 VIYMCIYI �'1LI71 7 7V/'1 VG 1 Vrlt7 a( �'L�'11YIYGr1V
2639 MCCORMICK DRIVE
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34619
(813)724-8422 FAX(813)724-8606
i
o c
--k- v,
SHEET
1
2
3
DRAWING INDEX
TITLE
COVER SHEET
PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS
//s3 gY13 J
it
•..... ` .
JOB NO. 999-36
_r
s
00
v
a,
r�
L
C1
r
ti
U
CJ7
U
0
L1J
t
11_
/
LL)
I
CT
Cr
LEGEND
Overland Flow Direction
= Concentruted Fic, v Plrection & Cra .' ient'
Hard Surface Drau a�e Pon & Giadrnt
Proposed Spot Llevation
x
= E- fisting Spot Elevation
PaoFr Sidewalks
EXISTING THEE LEGEND
V PALM
(9 SILK OAK
SIZE AS NOTED
0
EXiSPING
ONE STORY
F.F.E.= 28.1!
Or
EAST AVENUE �Q� � `��
\ PINELLAS TRAIL
i
PROPOSED OPENING IN NN
EXI iING RAIL.AILSJNGG
DO'rWN ---------- - - - - -I __. - - - -- - -- -- - - - - - - -- 300 LF SILT SCREEN
297.82' F
-- •• • ii '.!$iii ••• •.• ••• •••
r-- --- -i --_ -- L r - - --
I
I I n� III I
Y-T o
CL
tl j L � -- CONCRETE WHEEL STOP ,SIG AL
IJ11LITY COMPOUND'S
u s 1 la
00
t�
126. 00
'\ I 14- PARKING SPACE
PROVIDE CONCRETE EDGING BETWEEN !1 1
` s SHELL PARKING AREA AND LANDSCAPING, EXISTING SHELL----
I TYPICAL do PERIMETER. �5; �,
_ (BASE TO REMAIN AS IS).
0.509
X
/
\ FXICTING FXICTING
30 -YARD, SELF -C
CITY OF CLEARWA
(813) 462 -6121
COMPACTOR DIMEn
23' -0" LONG x 8'
SHADING DENOTES
8" CMU ENCLOSUF
TO BE 9',-0* HIGH
— _45.00
5- PARKING SPACES 0 9' -0" EACF#
7.50
PAVER SIDEWALKS
T`TPICAL
ENTRANCE GATE
W/ PARK SIGNAGE
_J.
n
0
Cn
10- PARKING SPACES 0 9' -0' EACI#
cr
0
N
O
J
\ {' / )) `
C
It
I
i4v — --
tF
SI IE__
SIGN
ii
CONCRETE FLUME— 3
N
LL. Q
Iv
RR X -iNG
STOP GATE
W
�CE)
C O
U
CC
a- ><
U QLJ
Z
W 5
u_
Ld0
` -T08 EL = 25.35 I I r 3
25' -0" HIGH FLAGPOLE I 1 » 4.50 I "� °
1 A
CIRCULAR PLANTING BED, `~ ��
8'-0" DIA., TYPICAL. r \ x' - RIP - RAP --� ! 2
T j ° N u
Q 1 Q /' �- - I I °LQ w
h /
cr
�' X O
uJ
CO
x
J S TRENCH DR N / �' `56 \ \� z ML`
iT IRON GRATE A S
\ / I ul
� � \ \ � `�= -� = -- PICNIC �.� DETENTION AREA � �� ('nl� Xo
IF MONUMENT WALL i� \\ - 8- PERSON CONIC Ct C D.H.W. EL = 25.34 EQ w
�� �. , °�� \`�`� ._ // \ SLABETYPICAL FOR DiA. D.L.W. EL = 24.92
� 4- PERSON CONC. PICNIC c4
STEEL BICYCLE RACK, MODEL NO �^ TABLE ON 10' -0" DIA. CONIC. SLAB. ���
2170 -11, BY: TIMBERFORM TYPICAL FOR EIGHT.
\ y 1\ _ --_�_— / 34 / CONTROL U RE
h/ ON BRICK PAVERS. \` SIR
1 I �— { O 0 GRATE El( 25.34
_ X' i VYEIR EL. 2
\ I/ = ^\� IE = 22.40
HAY BALES
tih h , (SEE DETAIL)
DOUBLE LINE DENOTES 4' -8" WIDE GRANITE • I - -- l < ~ - ___- ____._ - - -_ -- - -- -
VENEER PANELS, ETCHED WITH THE FOLLOWING TEXT: I 16" `\ 15 ", 5 ", 12" 17" 0
- THE TEN COMMANDMENTS
i c
- THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE )
TTTE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES I \� 131, �` - ? SWALE t3+
r!i
OF AMERICA
- THE BILL OF RIGHTS ' - - - -- , -- - -- - - -- � ^— .
ON A 9' -0` HIGH $" CMU 'rNALL I 16" —CONC. BENCH ON CONC. SLAB ¢\ O 1 45'(S1,C
-_� 36" HIGH YV}iITE, PVC EXISTING - -- — J
PICKET FENCE, TWO STORY MASONRY
- -T�_- TYPICAL K3 PERIMETER. CONNECT TO EXISTING
CURB INLET
I
I �-
L
W
2
Li
ui
�a
a
o
z
L
J
a
L
U
MEMO
Q
� I
X
O
a
a
a
i
W I'
I
�.
J P Q
0
I -
IE N = 22.33 , PROP 15 RCP
i
I I -
*PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN GRAPHICALLY
TO INDICATE NUMBER OF SPACES
STRIPING 'iMLL NOT OCCUR ON SHELL BASE
ryyti.4i,r„
1 ,
C•ESIG?ED
THE SIONATURC OF THE OVAl.1TY
_.... _ ..,
_
+,
-. - -- - -- -- - -- - -
JHE= T CE 'S '. P TiO�,
JOB N0' ' %.+
A
--
CONTROL OfFKER iN THIS SPA<E
FREEDOM PARK
999
-
F.R.H.
INDICATES THAT ALL REOUiPED
FLORIDA
DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
PINCH-A -PENNY INC.
�
-36'
2
CRA.4N
F.B. 9 PG.
PERMITS HA4E BEEN C•pTAiNEO
W.L.A.
AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS
AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE
'
-'^
ENGINEERS,
ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS
2639 McCorrr;ck Gr. G?e0r�aler FL, 33759
14480 62nd STREET NORTH
CLEARWA TER, FLORIDA 33760
(CLEARWATER)
PAVING GRADING AND
F.B.8PG.
SHT.
CHECKED
+?ATE.
3/30198
R. HARRIS
"e' �'3` ��1 -3422 ` ax: (?I�! 7% 1 3F !1
(813) 531 -8913
T
DRAINAGE PLAN
a.�.
AB D
NO.
CATS
PEYISIONS
S
i�
U
0
LL_
ao
Ln
w
0
a
0
rn
C:7)
CD
O
M
LiJ
w
cc
LL
/
D
co
I
Ln
rr
/
c`
DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE Of THE QUALITY
CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE
F.R.R. INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED
DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED
W.L.A.
AND THAT CONSTRUCTION iS
CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE.
R. HARRIS
D.C.
FILTER FABRIC __- HAY BALES
(MARAFI 600X) -
S
PROPOSED GRATE. BALE TIES
6' (TYP,) -
FILTER FABRIC
(MARAFI 600X)
SEDIMENT CONTROL DES
N.T.S.
POST (OPTIONS: 2' x 4' WOOD
OR 2 1/2' MIN. DIA.
STEEL 1.33 LBS /FT. MIN.) \
EDGE OF PAVEMENT F-- A
8' TAPER 8' TAPER
B
% o
SECTION A -A 6
w
0
2 15' TO 18"
o
8'
((_1
6" l— ii— A
PLAN VIEW
.I
N 1k
t
(Of
SECTION B -B
1 8' TAPER 1 I 8• TAPER I
FRONT ELEVATION,
TYPICAL CONCRETE FLUME DETAIL
N,T,S,
BALES Of STRAW SHEET FLOW
STAKED DOWN I I I
SINGLE ROW OF BALES OF STRAW TO BE PLACED PRIOR TO THE
START OF ROUGH GRADES
PLAN VIEW
SECURELY BWND
BALES REQUIRED FOR
DURABILITY
NOTE: TO BE USED 40 CONSTRUCTING ADJACENT TO ANY
ENYMMENTAL PRE` RVAT)ON AW-AS.
ANCHORING BALES
TEMPORARY STRAIN SEDIMENT BARRIER
N.T.S.
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
T14E CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTROL RUNOFF AND EROSION DURING
CONSTRUCTION THROUGH THE USE OF SEDIMENT BASINS, STRAW
OR HAY BALES AS APPRCPRIATE.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SPRINKLE OR OTHERWISE MANUALLY APPLY
WATER TO THE AFFECTED CONSTRUCTION AREA TO CONTROL BOTH
SIGNIFICANT WIND EROSION AND FUGITIVE DUST.
6' MAX.
FILTER FABRIC (IN
CONFORMANCE WMTH
SEC. 985 FOOT SPEC.)
ELEVATION
SILT SCREEN BARRIER DETAIL
N.T.S.
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS S PLANNERS
2639 McCormick Dr. Clearwater FL, 33759
Tel: (813) -724 -8422 - Fax (813)724 -8606
PREPARED FGR:
IN
U
it
SECTION
OPTIONAL POST POSITION
//PATTERN POST
PATTERN (CANT -
ED 20 DEGREES
TOWARDS FLOW)
FILTER FABRIC
SILT FLOW
2 -S -0' 15 REBAR
NOTE CONCRETE WHEEL STOPS SHALL BE INSTALLED 11
2 FEET FROM THE ENO OF THE 19' DEEP I I
PARKING SPACES WHICH DO NOT ABUT A CURB I I
II
II
WHEEL STOP DETAIL
N.T.S.
PINCH -A- PENNY, INC.
14480 62nd STREET NOR iH
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33760
(813) 531 -8913
a
0
1' 9 ' 3'
/ ----3' HT. WHITE PVC
PICKET FENCE
T.O.B. =25.35
MATCH EXIST. GRADE � ^
�tl'�.
NOTE
EL. =24.50
VARIES
T.O.B.-25.35
� DHW EL.-25.34
DLW EL. =24.92
BOTTOM EL. -23.00
1. IF CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED AS DESIGNED, THIS DETENTION AREA
WILL PROVIDE TREATMENT AND ATTENUATION FOR A 25YR /1HR DESIGN
STORM THAT WILL NOT HAVE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE ADJOINING
PROPERTIES.
2. SOD ENTIRE POND AREA TO 5' BEYOND TOP OF BANK.
TYPE 0
Strarght Bars ex �
ReNouline Sors 17 x f
Bands l }'x 4'
Approx. Wer9ht /80 Lbs.
GRATE DETAIL.
I
kr
WEIR OPENING
2' -3 3/8'
DETENTION AREA SECTION A-2
N,T,S.
C
C•
PLAN
1-4'-.5'
SEE DETAIL 'A',
1'
2' -3 3/8'
TOP OF GRATE do SKIMMER - 25.34
OVERFLOW SLOT EL. = 24,92
o �
F-7
BOTTOM OF SKIMME t
15" RCP, IE- 22.40
RECOMMENDED MAXIMUM PIPE SIZE,
3' -1' WALL - 24' PIPE
4' -1' WALL - 36' PIPE
SECTION
C —C
EDGES TO BE ROUNDED
12"
02_
Q
3
6
I
f-
6
S
MATCH EXIST. GRADE
(- -1 TOP OF STRUCTURE
GALV. LATE 1/4 P S
S SMOOTH FNISH KTHIS SIDE Y ''
BAR
O.C. 3' x 3 1/2' x 5/16'
GALV. ANGLE IRON 24
` �- -5/16"
1 15' RCP, IE =22.40
13 1/2-
1/4- WELD /8' x 2 1/2' S.S. BOLT
EACH SIDE 3' x 3 1/2' x 5/16'
SECTION E3--B DETAIL 'A' GALV. CUP ANGLE
MODI IED TYPE 'D' CONTROL STRUCTURE
F.D.O.T. INDEX 11232 .•` °`" t ,,:
N.T.S,
Illy
SHEET DESCRIPTION roa No.
FREEDOM PARK 999 -36
f ®.aPa.
(CLEARWATER) SHT,
F.
PAVING, GRADING AND DATATB.SPG.
E.
APPO
DRAINAGE DETAILS NO. DATE REVISION$ 3/30/98 OF
LOCATION MAC'
c Syr
i A _. A4t!il
n�
1� i.;iN
yi `r' x�, •±Si Rr a,v F,
��G• ^ .. + mil. +` � f�N�, .�'
rj r j Z s
I 1•tl 1{ A,1 ti
F �s� {( v1.A'i
CA
-4J, act
0
T. w2
-
i
� ; c
I KI A I MAY Z IN Z
'c"IN-310iffm -- iva I I -- 1, 2-
T- s\.
N.
VICINITY MAP
i
L 0 CA Fll_�N �
1
I
SHEE r
1
2
3
LAND USE SUMMARY
PINCH - -A —PENNY — COURT STREET
ZONING DISTRICT:
USE:
LOT AREA (S0. FT. AND ACRES)
GROSS AREA (WITHIN'PROPERTY LINES)
LOT WIDTH:
LOT DEPT14:
BUILDING COVERAGE
(SQ. FT. AND % OF CROSS SITE):
GROSS FLOOR AREA 1,ND F.A.R.
(SO. FT. AND % OF GROSS SITE):
PAVED VEHICULAR Af_AS AND SIDEWALKS
(S0. FT. AND % OF `OE);
OPEN SPACE:
DRAWING INDEX
.TT. LE
COVER SHEET
HOWOWAL COWHOL , 8- THPINO
AND "AGE PLAN
PAVING, GPADI C� DRAINAGE AND
UTILrfiY PLAN
EXISTING
PROPOSED
UC(C)
UC(C)
RETAIL
RETAIL
0.9538 ACRES —
41,550 SF
153 F T.
298 FT.
153 FT.
298 FT.
9,198 S.F. -- 22% 8,400 SF — 20%
9,198 S.F. — .22 6,846 SF — 20
19,972 S.F. — 48%
12,380 S.F. -- 297.
15,078 SF — 36%
19,626 SF — 4-8%o
REQUIRED
MIN. OR MAX.
k � So ,iti
�-
I� re�2
CL
Evy 0
8)
J06 NU. 999-3
� o
y r
►' -r 9q9 wp ' t ,
` qF
s
s
g
y €9
V
I
C
1;)Ci�iiit`1C� \
� I
i
�'xi��t +t,JG1 �xI�,T1�1G
17MIM
v11 A 4-
- li�j��TlclG#
Go1r1 Paa ND
V14)1
_ GD }1G•!Z64E= W/ %1t\LP1 d
"%�� YArjtp. ��L G- Gv�ITAI�IIQ GOMPAGYdt2.
�>'f ; Glt•( cat= GL�rtif�r�lA(�� -- ��o:l�
1�1ti�.�t� plvl <>Ir�r1 0813) �G,2 -121
GOl�lf'A�,`fG� �IMti�151v�1G> =
0" t»it4 �' -oy WIPe x 8' -`111 Nle/io
4NADIdi DeWvT 5 fxle >T106 6P' -o" H1611
r� "G1'ltl t:�1GLr�,IJ¢ kALL NgM,6! 1LT
TD r3� ��' -o'► f�ICiH TO 0195 Gil- tP�Gro -
OW /If LItJ5 Df 06 -f',l, 4RA1•JI•T. VE�1M,M
510leo WI tit 101� N/ LOWII.16i Tg�xT
• 14 , Gf4LAt2ATIa0 OF Ii1pt:P OPF,EJG6
• 14e GO }iSTITl1T10,1 Df; uFll t'r lj
• 1 }� IN L L. /if% 9160Th
dtJ 81.01' NIG }J
5x15-T1r161
air, eiToR f
t4mvo t -Y
1,
�t•1G 405U K��
1 go I ann t1 its II 1 ► /ltr
Gi 24t.1 L.,kV.
F-1. A4 L'T I1, 1C1
oollgl -o "pd
r'' I I
u '1
1 1 1 1 1 ! I I I I { 1 I
1 1 + ' � ' ' ' , I t•JES*t /.G`t1G ?�1'� GAS 5 %,� I
F'ALI�{�� , � � i t t 1 ; � � � � l�l`1li��i� {� ►/ (2) �� s?gl�� ,"t'i ?,
4- prROV106 Guj-t?�
dlz �t2601(1 !fllebI.
S
lot �n;2Y.10ei b.u�A t,AF1C�xl �1G
TYV16AL (,P
I
1 j .
I � '
i I I
1 ' 1
i 1 t
1 t
I
O e,l G12LULAV_ =1ti111�� tai 11F1 i►
�ft1xY 51 PeVIAL K --
J1J) ,�
1
i 51
�A
�
k•' MM
s.
1� a.<
jkA 1>
•
_
V �
.CdyyriAAtit f , <•
ki�lia�ls
1� ,
archlE�cti1 `z � sy
All Aightr Re>~PrY�4
lSSU6 OAlE
� ---,o
IC
1161M ON$"
(Eta/ �
GI?G //5 1 14
poiNT 60
FE8 2 3 108
� >IG�FIII!- n
1k TE�
im
w
x
i* I VVV
V �4 2y ` co
i i + j � IU f�Pi2K1E1Cil 5FAG8h � �I10� �A,+GI -j � �
I
' t
1 1
� 1 1 ► � 1 __ ' 1 ! c qQ
1
eW9At,J h,T
3
wl/ 'AUK- >}�ifJaGlr Lo'?� 110�v14' ,
1" j ----r
I, Ij 1 -11111 1 -�
oleo
v 2w
41 111 1Yt �I� X
111. 111 �I t ; -- •a___. __._. __
i
1 .. �IGf11G TA13L�. OFI ` !
VIA, *LAeP
�Z. �.: -' � •TIxASN ". "1`tPIGAt, FU,2 (r1� \ � (_ � I
TYt�iGhL-
Fdt2
dfY jl% REW1 ll SI 5A
�;,I - rIzT1C.:l►} 11,_,113
:Nla'ilwr�= {;I °I11 111:.:.11
= =111 =1 =la���!li 3t1_,zt1i31�
ill 111 � It1 ,1
� tll M ;S s 14111, it ,a ls! 5
�'� 4!! l ! 1 IR ut1 ! R;tRR!l11RRRl RI 1/!lI/IUJtib! t '! i1 ! ! 1 ill
'TA}3L1;
�'� - i�'•Q'` CIA• SLt�� _ x � � � l
T(Ple,,AL Nit N ! tJ I�
lot
via
211 !} , PS`t'; -ftt•13�1?,'or� I� r�1 . _ � # _ _.,
i
__.
• j � , ` ,1 • 3G1' NIC ;�I r1Nli� QV/ x i I�0
TYPICAL. y
01110 Y� x . x zc — ___ __._„ __ . zc _ • ,� _ - �c N Ti=
Ex�sriNq
`r rrec W, t 00
gcnLe
�7
i
Y
11.
1 M h f
111 MM � i
0 '
l
to
Ci
j.
IA-
4 . 4
S i
u.� �1 l 1a�► •, �� s:F
b
> ; <*
-"c
i
tt
K
SOO
��. q�
key
7
,
PNELLA5 TRAIL.
FR0P03ED OFENMG IN
i
EXISTING RAIL 5XViNG
1 i W-s
•
- s0rii•� i .wr�s+i ii'oi -i "d ii �Tio,�iii ` t•. J'.- 00..00 s .rwr r r c.ns . a wloo e o mri+r r r .t or s d .rrwr +, e. wrr .r arrr sr w wri r r o r A rrr A o wow� r �, � r r eas ew r srr �r +wrr .� �r� r o sort s .� �r rrr r s &Aw r r � .D r +,am1 .0 'm � r rr� + .0 .00.0 co s --Awe .0 � ® Y minim .0 .0 a,rr,D eaM a�r
3'•0' LANGSCAPiNG Bi,11•TER
Jj
r.
I I � � Y .. /r r�'���sj, ,•1�� � I i � i I I � � i v
f�f1��
� M`I1.7
TI,'
NEW 2J CAR AlO PICAL S
ONE STORY M° 1-, I 1 x -ItiG
_-. ►- 1 it { . ��
I 1 STOP GATE
UTILITY COMPOIrtiO
` f I
to�
•,;r, >; 14- PNC9�Ks 8i'AGS 01' Ow EAGN 1
�1 C �'�? �� ��f�>����.��•�'���1��5��;? %��� �:J�� f'�:��:..� PROVIDE CGNGF;I-:TE CUF0 OR
lC �I EDGjN. SEMEEN %%ELL PARKING AREA I
— -- — -- - —_ -- -- AND LAND6CAPiNG, TYPICAL t PERIMETER,
1 EXISTING Si-+ELL �_ 1
_ - -- - -3LOFED CL+R'B FOR BASE TO REMAIN. 1
DISABLED ACCESS n
1
5- PAFC,NG SPACES *V-0' EACH !O -PAl M SPACES V -0' EACH 1
1 _ 3
\&0FED C,W FOR
66 i
VoAI3Leo AGGE 317E
EXISTING EXISTING*
A5PIWT I CONCRETE I JJ LL
-.- -- - - - - -- ----- - - - -,_ PAVER 31DE0ALK6 i 1
V CQ4C. 0143 1
Tl'R?'tm t e
I
ExISTiN_G I r
W/ PAW 644AGE
A31--el) LINE DENOTES
EXISTNG 6' CM
1 i
OU"2'STER LOCATION
I
I
To BE RED Io vSD
Syr,,
NEO 9' "
Ct1;2CUl.AR PLANT�*iCs BED,
'
1
II
WALL t0 25 0 NiGS� FT�OLE i7�1
o �n
SCREEN 8 -9 N� DI TYPICAL.
V-011 A, -
}�
�
COW ACTOR
ACT' /tom
I ":r
Y
Y
j r /
CONfiiM10 h TFVNCt4 DRAIN
,
r
.-� -- -- ,, _ �r�
7777 BASE T �...r ; .. - .'`� -L —�- _, �.,�,,,� ` �.r A ' - rRGN , , r� �,�i
�„•�, r` W/ CAST GRATE AT � \ � 11
/. ;.
• .>- ;� /r / . 1 - R6GN GGtiC. PICNIC
% , BA$E of N ENT WALL > j > �� �' ' $ .
y ,�,,� >, r � .� -a .�•. raBLE aN IV-0l DIA ccNc. 3LAB
TYPICAL TWO, -
.:�;'�` P CAI. FOR
EX16TiNCs <i?
ENCLOs31.RE '�,,r�J.c. <..'S`<�'C .',' _'1��. .�r ' ( ^- 'r�r'^�'t..<` -`e' `✓ �' ''' X
/ t
xy�
r S `
30 -YARD, 6E'LF -CGNTA P COMPACTOR BY:
' VVV
CITY OF GLEARWATER SOLID WASTE DIVISION
(613) 462.6121 �r� ?Y � ��' jti, < .,ti .. Yf l� ;� , z - ,
iii 'S ✓� b ./ ,/. /`i , v\ n � r � r
COMPACTOR 01'1"!" ARE �''\ 1' . R ' 4 -- 4- PERSON GOTvG. PICNIC
" " f r;v ,} / 1 1 1: ' 1. i' �a {' 61EEL BIGYU.I~ TRAM MODEL NO. � l � TABLE ON 10' -0' DIA CONC. %-AB.
23 -0 LGNG x 8 -0 WIDE x 8 -9 N,CiN. -
/' .,� y, , '�� y. ,�� a,I- • �:v � � �`,'� �, �, t r �'. ir-'�_± � ' . t � ,; F ��} t 2110 -I1, BY: T l�O�'1 ' T7PaC� FCR EKsNT
ONt 8R}QC PAVER3.
` - smc l 1.' y �'C r,;. ,/ ; ,;,€ F.,;li- .1 �� ii., +!� ✓.. >x %'�C 1.;' i' 1 z' r!..E _ _ V . . �i ,;•r%/ i 1
--
,/ � ( ,t �I <�t '�'� �J"i ' r - i � � �„{,�.;y,� l�Z���l.' br° yi. y S r T � •�'- r vy -- __ f 3a
c
314ADMs DENOTES EXISTN G 6'-V' 1-1614 CN ''/ r ����,� \y,� \,r�;�ty, f�iY ,r_ >// / , ��..', 3 '�''_.;�� ,I._� � li' '. `v y`�,��r ,.�..,•Y<<�'�. ' / ,/t � I�'� f- 111 �� �
— ___`_ >- '/ .. � �• . ,;. I- m r r :: � -,� ,Stir' ,� r s . r
"
8 GM ENCLOSURE WALL O`ER BUILT,
9' -0' NIGH
���� . �' �,y ` :.. _., ..._• -• -- - ,, t .:''' 3!�. ,,,f� ✓x� .`i ;;.aC�-�! i\�..,�rj�i.�< ^. �. Y, `�` -f _._._- __ __ _- •_ __- -^._._ _ _._ _ �� -_ '� ''j Y yY 1�' �/ � 1
.
CiRCUL R PLHI\T"R3 D . C " _ . rrt / _ ,{ < (x - .. _ _ _ - -- ��' < I
y y� }
12' -O' DI� ,EMR. i -� V-
DOl1Bl._ LINE DE'�lOTE8 8 DE RATE / � _
.! i j r l�`I,i{`. I,t� �I � y <..•c�'�. rt✓1 . l
YEEER PANELS ETCHED tWITN THE FOLLOWMI TEXT: // ; < �r //1Z �^ ' ���' . Y : v / w,� •, 1 1 " ■ , r r r
,�\� � `ti r� � t�•� `'� ;� b '� �� 15,+5,f2,tl 6'N 11,NlE.PY
THE MN t TS � 3 iGN 1 C 1 d
/
- THE DECLARATION OF NPEPENDb.E j! �v o �S < • f � r \ / • : '� �� ' �? � ,< 13" yy�^p%(��/�.�'A 1 p�� (}�� Cry "
< ,• <, Y\'. �'l, i� % .!'•.. ^t. r- v: t t`r� �, O o 111 -IVW. PERM TER , i _ 13
TI I t LNIT STATER - - -
- Ti•�CCNNj33 TUtONCE THE ED
CF AMERICA
- iii, 3- �f�i -� MI.
- THE BILL OF RIC 'l61 C) - - : ' _ -
163.4�3 _ _. 1 WATER
CONG E GN GUtvr, SLAB
� ME1ER
I
t
I
I
i
iI
I
i
I x
SEE SKEET A -2 FOR DETAIL WALL PLAN AND
0• + Our v a.rs0r • r .r o0aw r T rYr P01ICiAL FOR 1
0I �rw • +IM • • 010/. .r �. o.:.:.. r ..'..r..... . ,.
' )
-3 FOR DETAL WALL ELEVATION. w� v 3uEET A
/ /
I /
TVO STORY MASONRY / I
1
I
/ I gXOTW4 IEEE LErntw
1 L
V PALM
0 OAK
-
o,: r;sl�oi r / r/ t 0 / .0/r%o1u/ /ti ./ ' // /r / � / � �/ %/'%'' ' / 1 � 4/ . ' ! A r r • # i im. T a/ /ti_ r ,Y , .•, T- -- ,% — -/- % r- j����- f+r ' J l/ I I _ _ -...
� O 40 40 ILK OAK
; t 51z A NOTED
. r a - 51TE APR 10 1998 • o0lrar • s. 010rsy o 00 0b..1w *,W '110✓ / PLAN CENTRAL PERMITTING 7/j /j ! %i /,/
/ /
- + ; CITY OF CLEARWATER
,,A
JOB START DALE
�J copinb'lt
Aude, Shand & Williams
Aithitects,
,1.11 Rights Resen-d
ISSUE DATE t
4.10 -93
MN.
SMSKNS
I
APR
I
CA
LY-
0
- 11_
l/ N.
n\ 1Y--
O�
I
ILI
� 1 ILI
11- V In
SHEET NO.
<C
0M-
Sc
0
00
LL
u
F—
F F
p
_j
i
•C�
a
Q
cl-
,J
..A..
w
L
�
U
(
2
®
O
,r
z
Z
�C w
U)
�
3
v
W
MU
r
I
CA
LY-
0
- 11_
l/ N.
n\ 1Y--
O�
I
ILI
� 1 ILI
11- V In
SHEET NO.