The URL can be used to link to this page

940 COURT STTREE EVALUATION, COURT STREET PROJECT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA February 15, 2006 Written for: Wilson Miller Prepared by: Kettles' Environmental Services, Inc. . Project Consultant: Michael Kettles RCA, CA, CF, President TREE EVALUATION, COURT STREET PROJECT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Written for: Wilson Miller Summary I conducted my initial field evaluation at the site on February 13, 2006, in order to evaluate the overall condition and species of 47 trees. The City of Clearwater required that every tree on the property that is in excess of four (4 ") inches DBH (diameter at 4 1/2 feet above the ground) be evaluated, as to their condition, canopy spread, and other observations pertaining to health and structural attributes. On February 10, 2006, after accepting my proposal, I was subcontracted by Shaun Drinkard, of WilsonMiller, and asked to carry out the above referenced tree evaluation. Assignment I was asked to conduct a field evaluation of the trees, to number them individually for later identification, and to prepare a written report, including spread sheets, listing the condition, and health /structural attributes of all trees exceeding four (4 ") inches DBH. Also, I was to place the tree numbers on the AutoCAD tree survey drawing that was provided to me by WilsonMiller. Purpose and Use This Tree Evaluation serves as an informational guide, providing the condition, canopy spread, and health /structural attributes of all trees that were evaluated in this study. Kettles' Environmental Services, Inc. Page 1 of 8 TREE EVALUATION, February 13, 2006 COURT STREET PROJECT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Written for: Wilson Miller Observations Site The site is presently developed with several commercial buildings and parking lots for various uses. The predominant species of the trees that exist on this site were identified as follows- Live oak (Quercus virginiana), Laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), and Cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto). Other species that were found scattered in small numbers on the site were: Italian cypress (Cupressus sempervirens), Water oak (Quercus nigra), Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Arborvitae (Thuja spp.), Queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana), Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta), and Rubber tree (Ficus elastica). Three species listed by Florida and invasive species was also found on the site, and are as follows: Chinese Tallow (Sapium sebiferum), Silk oak (Grevillia robusta), and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). The site is located within the city limits of Clearwater, Florida. This commercial parcel of land is surrounded by other commercial properties on the south and west, a city park on the north, and multi- family residential on the east. Physical Description The overall condition of a majority of the live and laurel oak trees was found to be unsatisfactory, due to co- dominant leaders with included bark, poor form, areas of decay from old limb breakage and wounding, and various stages of decline. The overall condition of the palms was generally good. Testing and Analysis The conditions of the trees were evaluated using the scale system recommended by the City of Clearwater. This system identifies the condition of trees based on a scale of 0 - 6. Zero is a dead tree. One is in very poor or hazardous condition, or in severe decline, and unfit for the final landscape. Two is also in poor health or structurally unsound and unfit in the final landscape. Three is in relatively overall good health and structurally sound, but occasionally exhibits structural problems that can be corrected. Four is in very good health and structurally sound. Five is in excellent health and an excellent specimen of its species. Six is an outstanding specimen of its species. Kettles' Environmental Services, Inc. Page 2 of 8 TREE EVALUATION, COURT STREET PROJECT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Written for: Wilson Miller February 13, 2006 Each tree was numbered on the plan, and their physical attributes evaluated and recorded on the data sheets. Discussion Most of the interior trees fail to have adequate physical qualities to warrant their preservation into the final landscape. Live oak tree # 28, which is a 52" tree, exhibits many physical problems. These problems are identified on the evaluation data form. Laurel oak tree # 45, which also is a 52" tree, appears in relatively good condition for a laurel oak of its age. I did not see any indication of included bark in any of the main lateral points of attachment, and the trunk appears structurally sound. There are several good quality live oak trees located along the east perimeter edge (Ewing Ave) of the site that could be saved in the final landscape, excepting obvious concerns with overhead power lines. Live oak tree #29, which is a 20" tree, is in relatively good condition with minor multi-branch caused bark inclusions away from the trunk out on several of its main lateral branches. This condition is correctable. Please refer to the attached Tree Quality and Canopy Evaluation Plan and the Tree. Evaluation Data sheets to identify the locations and condition of these and other trees evaluated in this report. Recommendations Do to the close proximity of overhead power lines to the row of live oaks along Ewing Ave., and the fact that they are not exceptional trees, I recommend that they be removed at this time, and replaced with a substantial number of smaller growing evergreen trees (ie. Japanese blueberry, Yaupon holly). This should provide for an adequate buffer along the east perimeter of the property. Proposed parking within the drip line area of Laurel oak # 45 should be designed utilizing grass crete, turf block, or similar materials that will allow aeration of the soils around the roots. Furthermore, no cutting into the natural grade should be permitted within this area. All subgrade and finish grade materials should be placed upon the natural grade, so as to avoid root cutting damage to the tree. Kettles' Environmental Services, Inc. Page 3 of 8 TREE EVALUATION, COURT STREET PROJECT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Written for: Wilson Miller February 13, 2006 Prior to site clearing, . all trees to be saved shall be barricaded according to tree barricade specifications of the City of Clearwater. The barricades shall extend to the drip lines of trees to be saved in most situations. Tree barricades shall remain in place during all phases of site clearing and construction. They shall be removed only when permitted to do so by Rick Albee, of the City of Clearwater. No grubbing, excavating, or filling shall be permitted within tree barricaded areas, nor shall the placement of any vehicles, equipment, out houses, building supplies, soils, chemicals, fuels, or other materials that could be harmful to the trees to be saved shall be permitted. All of the cabbage palms that fall within future construction areas are in good health and worthy candidates for relocation into the final landscape. Kettles' Environmental Services, Inc. Page 4 of 8 TREE EVALUATION, COURT STREET PROJECT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Written for: Wilson Miller February 13, 2006 Assuml2tions and Limiting Conditions 1. Any legal description provided to the consultant /appraiser is assumed to be correct. Any titles and ownerships to any property are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. Any and all property is appraised or evaluated as though free and clear, under responsible ownership and competent management. 2. It is assumed that the property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes, or other governmental regulations. 3. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however, the consultant /appraiser can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 4. The consultant /appraiser shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule and contract of engagement. 5. Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. 6. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant /appraiser. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report, nor any copy thereof, shall be conveyed by anyone, including the client, to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media, without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant /appraiser particularly as to value conclusion, identity of the consultant /appraiser, or any reference to any professional society or institute or to any initialed designation conferred upon the consultant /appraiser as stated in his qualification. 8. This report and the values expressed herein represent the opinion of the consultant /appraiser, and the consultant's /appraiser's fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value, a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported. 9. Sketches, diagrams, graphs, and photographs in this report, being intended as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys. 10. Unless expressed otherwise: 1) information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection; and 2) the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation, probing, or coring. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the plants or property in question may not arise in the future. Kettles' Environmental Services, Inc. Page 5 of 8 TREE EVALUATION, COURT STREET PROJECT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Written for: Wilson Miller Certification of Performance I, Michael W. Kettles, Kettles' Environmental Services, Inc. Certify: February 13, 2006 • That I have personally inspected the tree(s) and /or property referred to in this report and have stated my findings accurately. The extent of the evaluation or appraisal is stated in the attached report and the Terms of Assignment; • That I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; • That the analysis, opinions and conclusion stated herein are my own and are based on current scientific procedures and facts; • That my analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices; • That no one provided significant professional assistance to me, except as indicated within the report; • That my compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause on the client or any other party nor upon the results of the assessment, the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any subsequent events. I further certify that I am a member in good standing of the American Society of Consulting Arborists, the International Society of Arboriculture, and the Society of American Foresters. I have been involved in the field of Arboriculture in a full time capacity for a period of more than twenty years. Signed: Date: Michael W. Kettles RCA, CA, CF Kettles' Environmental Services, Inc. Page 6 of 8 TREE EVALUATION DATA Tree # Tree Species Tree Condition 1 Live oak 3 2 :Live oak 3 3 Live oak 2 COURT STREET PROJECT Tree DBH ( ") Observations Page 7 of 8 16 ' 13 15 11 Included bark; Power line conflict Included bark; Power line conflict Included bark; Power line conflict 4 5 Live oak 2 2 Included bark; Power line conflict Laurel oak 7,9 Included bark; Poor form 6 Laurel oak 2 5 Poor form 7 Laurel oak 2 8 Poor form 8 Brazilian Pepper 1 8 Invasive species 9 Cabbage palm 3 18' j ' ` Power line conflict 10 Live oak 2 6,4,6 Poor form Poor form 11 Laurel oak 2 2 5 12 Live oak 9 Poor form 13 Live oak 2 15,15,9 Poor form; Dieback 14 Washington palm 3 14' '+ Power line conflict 15 Cabbage palm 3 18 16 Water oak 2 5,9 Poor form 17 Cabbage palm 3 15 "' Poor form 18 Chinese Tallow 1 17 Invasive species; Extensive dieback 19 Live oak 2 6,7,8 Included bard; Poor form 20 Live oak 2 5 Poor form 21 Laurel oak 1 6 Poor form 22 Live oak 2 15,8 Poor form; Power line conflict 23 Brazilian Pepper 1 10,9,5,8 Invasive species Tree # Tree Species Tree Condition Tree DBH ( ") Observations Page S of 8 Poor form; Power line conflict 24 Live oak 2 7 25 Live oak 2 11,10 21 17," ' _ 52 Included bard; Power line conflict Invasive species 26 27 28 Chinese Tallow 2 3 2 Cabbage palm Live oak Heavy lean_ Internal decay(ganoderma); Serious mechanical damage and bark seperation; Poor form; Broken main laterals with decay 29 Live oak 3 20 ` Included bark in main laterals 30 Cabbage palm 3 10 f '' 31 Cabbage palm 3 20 32 Cabbage palm 3 14 33 34 Silk oak 1 7,10 Poor form; Dieback Silk oak 1 9 Poor form; Dieback 35 Sweetgum 3 4 17 Minimal storm damage; Major surface roots 36 Cabbage palm 15 37 Queen palm 2 10 Nutrient deficiency 38 Queen palm Italian cypress 2 8 Nutrient deficiency 39 1 5 Decline 40 Arborvitae 3 5 Considered a shrub 41 Italian cypress 2 4 Minor decline 42 Italian cypress 3 8 43 Italian cypress 2 6 Minor decline 44 Rubber tree 4 40 (base) Multi- stemmed; Limited freeze and pruning damage 45 Laurel oak 4,3 52 Multiple main laterals -no evidence of included bark 46 Live oak 2 16 Girdled by old support wires; Poor form 47 Water oak 2 124 Included bark; Dieback and decline in canopy a A Z5 /- 24 ' 0 29.53 1 12 UNDERDRAIN DETAIL NTS T TABLE 51RUL-TUE" DESCRIPTION 7 FDOT STRUCTURE #201 22, 227j 5x 22.25X22„x23.45 '22 95 �235 .23.84 x24.40 RIM EL= 27.25 INV, EL. SE= 21.70 (2:� RCP INV EL W= 23.00 (12 - RCP) 22 4,' ----------- 4� PROP. 137' MODULAR INV EL NW= 22.10 (15. RCP x24.8 x24�8 .25.0 .26.50 - 29.ig INV EL SW= 21.35 (24 RCP INV EL E= 2&30 (6 PVC FROM FOUND BLOCK RETAINING WALL HAVEN STREET 40 4' HIGH CHAIN 28.90 x x 2 FDOT TYPE F GRATE INLET UG GAS W' P 2 3�5 -L---f:� rm 23,40 (DESIGNED BY OTHERS) UE 23.9--- VACATED 7w" "24 DUMP STER --A ENCLOSURE 28.6 PROP 90 MODULAR 6' UNK FENCE HIGH BLOCK RETAINING WALL--------, ,WOOD FEN - CE&,SjIrNFfY-RY-nT4FRl;) L---i 29.53 1 12 UNDERDRAIN DETAIL NTS 10113 m-� QRAItlAQE STRUCTURE 51aucLa" DEaQaalm I FDOT STRUCTURE #201 TABLE 51RUL-TUE" DESCRIPTION 7 FDOT STRUCTURE #201 STORMWATER MANHOLE STORMWATER MANHOLE RIM EL.= 26.60 INV, EL. NE= 22-40 (12: RCPj RIM EL= 27.25 INV, EL. SE= 21.70 (2:� RCP INV EL W= 23.00 (12 - RCP) INV EL NW= 22.10 (15. RCP INV. EL N= 23.42 �8" PVC FROM ROOF DRAIN �) INV EL SW= 21.35 (24 RCP INV EL E= 2&30 (6 PVC FROM FOUND 8 FOOT STRUCTURE #201 2 FDOT TYPE F GRATE INLET STORMWATER MANHOLE RIM EL.= 26.50 RIM EL= 26.80 INV. EL W= 21.90 (24* RCP� INV EL, N= 22.60 (12- RCP) INV. EL E= 22.00 (18° RCP INV. EL SE= 22.50 (15- RCP INV. EL NE= 24.50 (6" PVC FROM FOUND DRAIN) FOOT STRUCTURE #2 9 FDOT STRUCTURE #201 3= MWATER 0 LE 27.10 STORMWATER MANHOLE ZA -\ A IN W= 2�1. 18- RCP) RIM EL= 24.50 INV EL N= 20.75 (2-8- PVC) 00 (1 P) V. EL. E= 22.00 (1 P) INV EL. E= 20.75 (15- RCP) Z4 INV. EL, SW= 20.65 (15 - RCP) 3 FDOT TYPE F GRATE INLET FDOT STRUCTURE #201 RIM EL.= 27.40 MWATER MA INV. EL W= 22.70 RCP 45 �18: INV. EL. N= 22.80 15 RCP INV E - 12- RCP) �2. I S= 22i.85�" CP) 4 FDOT STRUCTURE #201 ---INV. EL. E= 23.45 8" PV STORMWATER MANHOLE RIM EL.= 26.50 11 FDOT TYPE F GRATE INLET INV. EL S= 2310 15: RCP RIM EL.= 25.00 INW= V. EL. i 15 � POUND INV. EL, W= 21,70 (15" RCP) INV. EL 23 . FROM DRAIN) 5 -"�-DOT STRUCTURE #;a�-� FDOT TYPE F GRATE INLET RIM EL= 26.20 STDRUWATER JLWTOLE INV. EL. SE= 23.55 (15- RCP) RI V--ZI:5-:�--27.45 IN S= 213 " RCP) 6 FDOT STRUCTURE #201 INV El - 23.454(5 10- PVC FRO F DRAIN) STORMWATER MANHOLE RIM EL= 27.25 INV. EL W= 22.60 (12- RCP) FOOT STRUCTURE #201 INV. EL. NE= 2170 (12- RCP) RMWATER MA -M*-F- INV. EL. N= 2142 (8- PVC FROM ROOF DRAIN) 50 4- INV E - 1 18" �M INV. EL. E= 24.90 (6- PVC FROM FOUND DRAIN) �RCPJ . I W= 19.05 CPI lb!YEETS AT EXISTING STORM STRUCTURES 14 FDOT TYPE F GRATE INLET STRUCTURE EX.l: INV, NE= 21.10 RIM EL.= 22.50 STRUCTURE EX.2: INV. E= 18.75 INV. EL S= 21.03 (8" PVC) STRUCTURE EX.3: INV. S= 20.40 NOTES. ALL STORM DRAIN PVC PIPES FROM THE BUILDING SHALL EXIT THE BUILDING AT AN ELEVATION OF 23.50 AND CONTINUE AT A 1% SLOPE TO THE PROPOSED MANHOLE OR CLEANOUT, FOUNDATION DRAIN LOCATION, INVERTS, AND CONNECTION POINTS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED FOR POTENTIAL CONFLICTS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR FOUNDATION DRAIN DETAILS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR CONTINUATION OF STORM DRAIN LINES IN BUILDING. 10113 m-� THE FOLLOWING ARE EASEMENTS INCLUDED IN SCHEDULE B — SECTION 2 OF THE TITLE COMMITMENT ORDER No. 41230649CA ISSUED BY = CENTERLINE COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 22, 2004 AT 8:00 A.M.: L1j Easement in favor of Florida Power Corporation (Progress Energy) recorded in O.R. Book 741, Page 64B. FH (PLOTTED HERON) GA 7- Easement in favor of Florida Power Corporatinn (Progress Energy) recorded in O.R. Book 4191, Page 1171. HC (BLANKET IN NATURE — NOT PLOTTED HEREON) LTP 8. Easement in favor of Florida Power Corporation (Progress Energy) recorded in O.R. Book 4606, Page 1447. > OC LL! O.F.S. 9. Easement over and across the West 15 feet of Parcel 1 < in Deed recorded in O.R. Book 4009, Page 176. PP (PLOTTED HEREON) PP/ LT NOTE: ALL RECORDING REFERENCES REFER TO THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DIKII71 I A(z r1nI IKITY n nPInA = PHONE SERVICE Lj < 5 = PHONE SERVICE BOX PSP Z� uj TB LJ I > = TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX CL b- >- WP = WARNING POST WM = WATER METER P[mrs" - &Oxwe Ecobgbta Smeyora - Larxftepe Architecis -Tr a Con%danfs 0 Uo-, VERTICAL SCALE: V)!� INDEX NU CL W&=APT,er, Inc. Akp�as, Fort Afyers - Sarawt ton . Thuipa -Ta CL RESIDENCE INN 0;� CIN ICROSS REFERENCE FILE NO.: PROJECT NUMBER: U) Lu C PW Charm—wd� Drive, Ste 4M - TwpA FbddR WW2 - Phmsa- W-223-M - r-ar 0-223--= - Web-SO& nwKZ=mPrc= C !"J (10 0 LID 1 05211-001-000 4 9 V., 02. 2006 - 15!32°13 JDOMX.-\ENG\05211\01\R.,00\05211-001004-d+9 Q STORM MANHOLE RIKIL-�� ELEV.=22.70 THE FOLLOWING ARE EASEMENTS INCLUDED IN SCHEDULE B — SECTION 2 OF THE TITLE COMMITMENT ORDER No. 41230649CA ISSUED BY = CENTERLINE COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 22, 2004 AT 8:00 A.M.: 0. Easement in favor of Florida Power Corporation (Progress THE FOLLOWING ARE EASEMENTS INCLUDED IN SCHEDULE B — SECTION 2 OF THE TITLE COMMITMENT ORDER No. 41230649CA ISSUED BY = CENTERLINE COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 22, 2004 AT 8:00 A.M.: CONC. Easement in favor of Florida Power Corporation (Progress Energy) recorded in O.R. Book 741, Page 64B. FH (PLOTTED HERON) GA 7- Easement in favor of Florida Power Corporatinn (Progress Energy) recorded in O.R. Book 4191, Page 1171. HC (BLANKET IN NATURE — NOT PLOTTED HEREON) LTP 8. Easement in favor of Florida Power Corporation (Progress Energy) recorded in O.R. Book 4606, Page 1447. MTP (BLANKET IN NATURE ® NOT PLOTTED HEREON) O.F.S. 9. Easement over and across the West 15 feet of Parcel 1 as reserved in Deed recorded in O.R. Book 4009, Page 176. PP (PLOTTED HEREON) PP/ LT NOTE: ALL RECORDING REFERENCES REFER TO THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DIKII71 I A(z r1nI IKITY n nPInA = PHONE SERVICE QT-*Rlffx-y"�M CB = CATCH BASIN CL or = CENTERLINE Co = CLEANOUT CONC. = CONCRETE CS = CABLE SERVICE FH = FIRE HYDRANT GA = GUY ANCHOR GV = GATE VALVE HC = HANDICAP LTP = LIGHT POLE MH = MANHOLE MTP = METER POLE O.F.S. = OVERFLOW STRUCTURE PB = POWER BOX PP = POWER POLE PP/ LT = POWER POLE wl LIGHT PS = PHONE SERVICE PSB = PHONE SERVICE BOX PSP = PHONE SERVICE PEDESTAL TB = TOP OF BANK TSB = TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX UG = UNDERGROUND WP = WARNING POST WM = WATER METER =10711-010(t0wo `TO 'JU6 IV S.I.R. = SET IRON ROD, 5/Er F.I.R. = FOUND IRON ROD, 51Er F.C.M. = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT, 4%4* F.O.P. — FOUND OPEN PIPE, 1/2� D. — FOUND #/ No. = NUMBER P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT O.R- = OFFICIAL RECORDS P.B. = PLAT BOOK (D) = DEED (M) = MEASURED (P) = PLAT AREV NO. I REVISION I DATE DRAWN BY / EMP. NO, SITE INFO PROPERTY AREA: BUILDING USE: BUILDING FOOTPRINT. GROSS FLOOR AREA: F.A.R: BUILDING HEIGHT REQUIRED PARKING: 1.0 PER ROOM PROVIDED PARKING: Q STORM MANHOLI�11:6�1)1� ELEV,=25-.25 RMATION 2.219 Ac (96,656 SF) HOTEL 11,864 sq. ft. 81,439 sq, ft. 0.84 67 feet 115 Rooms 115 Spaces STANDARD: 114 Spaces HC PARKING: 5 529—cu TOTAL: 119 Spaces TOTAL PAVED AREA: 48,113 SF (50% of property area) IMPERMEABLE SURFACE RAT10: 0.69 BEr59'1 1"W, 15.00' JEX. 6" PVC WATER MAIN 5145 &'Z'. 2 5 mam 0201 -1 MANHOLE RIM ELEV.-27.66 INITIALS/EMP. NO, KMJ 6005 DATE 02 02 A, In -R 1, Mill v CLIENT : DATE: OaZL2/06 TITLE: THE CLARKSON COMPANY HORIZONTAL SCALE: SITE AND UTILITIES PLAN KA , KMJ/1 605 02 6 1R =30' 1"=30' FLORIDA MT69CATE 39 1 P[mrs" - &Oxwe Ecobgbta Smeyora - Larxftepe Architecis -Tr a Con%danfs PROJECT: DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER VERTICAL SCALE: INDEX NU W&=APT,er, Inc. Akp�as, Fort Afyers - Sarawt ton . Thuipa -Ta RESIDENCE INN NLA SEC: TWP: RGE: ICROSS REFERENCE FILE NO.: PROJECT NUMBER: SHEET NUMBER: PW Charm—wd� Drive, Ste 4M - TwpA FbddR WW2 - Phmsa- W-223-M - r-ar 0-223--= - Web-SO& nwKZ=mPrc= 15 29 15 1 1 05211-001-000 4 9 V., 02. 2006 - 15!32°13 JDOMX.-\ENG\05211\01\R.,00\05211-001004-d+9 I$ am W-11 I - T- z 13 1 i 4 � I 1 3 Z--- "� ImAgm LANDSCAPE TABULAT1011 TREES RETAINED TREES REMOVED '041aw 337 • TOTAL DEBIT wwwwom TOTAL CREDIT 272 in. TOTAL DEBIT 337 in. 272 TOTAL CREDIT (IN.) IN. REQUIRED 65 in. TOTAL PROVIDED 142 in. NET INCHES + 77.0 in. 19,11:11241,1k • mw-- low" IN19101110 PARKING CALCULATION: TOTAL REQUIRED- 115 SPACES TOTAL PROVIDED: 119 SPACES NOTE: Refer to landscape detail sheet for protective barrier requiren 1 i I I 4 I 15 9 0409111 MO. IN COOPERATION WITH: lounds and Gillespiz 1� L110 we?,, I TOTAL TYPE TOTAL INCHES INCHES PROVIDED PROVIDED Drake Elm 9 2.5 22.5---- Live Oak 9 2•5 22.5 Chinese Fan Palm 33 1 33 Mediool Date Palm 8 2.5 20 Crape Myrtle 14 1 2.0 28 Ligustrum 8 2.0 16 TOTAL PROVIDED 142 in. NET INCHES + 77.0 in. 19,11:11241,1k • mw-- low" IN19101110 PARKING CALCULATION: TOTAL REQUIRED- 115 SPACES TOTAL PROVIDED: 119 SPACES NOTE: Refer to landscape detail sheet for protective barrier requiren 1 i I I 4 I 15 9 0409111 MO. IN COOPERATION WITH: lounds and Gillespiz 1� L110 we?,, I 2 3 5 PARKING AND INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA SCIENTIFIC NAME VEHICULAR USE AREA (COMMERCIAL)- 47,928 SF REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA (10%): 4,792 SF PROVIDED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA- (12.1%): 5,808 SF REQUIRED INTERIOR SHRUB AREA (50%): 2,904 SF D PROVIDED INTERIOR SHRUB AREA: (50.9%): 2,958 SF PARKING CALCULATION- Chinese Fan Palm TOTAL REQUIRED: 115SPACES TOTAL PROVIDED: 119 SPACES Lagerstroemia indica PARKING & INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA LAODSCAPE PLANTING SCHEDULE 0 j " ; "tj -ml loo- IF. NO.Nw .1k UIP11-1.44 NowporwIl"9011 " + Pmw f000inspection, fecs 073 mcmdat-If ar 0 LZA M A jwi SN 4 to 45 goyass v, 0 gj U UY. 61I� DSCAPE T i 'OR 11M ,min 50 livin( ALL A!"I %lb"IS "-"I WHHOUT THE 00N� 1",bMING DIREC'101� PLAN PP, ALL tANIDSCAPINI,37 TO BE PROTECTED , I D �' q T,"�' FRO%,,l VEH?Mic CULA zv� `AN TRAFFIC BY A HIGH CU',�� qv ic al SCIENTIFIC NAME 0 r GF /PALMS L JUL in D e G vc 4,4 1 Livistona chinensis Chinese Fan Palm 10'-12'CT. straight trunk Lagerstroemia indica 8'-10'HT. 4�-6SP., 2.0"CAL. MIN-STANDARD Lig # # ;II NEI 1I M %11 WA#j KOY.11 r-boenix dactylitera'Medjool' 116'CT. stralghttrunk Quercus virginiana "-14'HT. 4-6'-SP., Ulmus pandfolia'Drake' NTAL GRASSES 18%24" HT., 18-24" SP. �Loropetalum chinense rubrunI Muhlenbergia capillaris 16%18"HT., 16"-18"SP. Plumbago'Imperial Blue' II� IM Mail ------- ,ADDITIONAL ITEMS Smeaded Haidwood Mulch 138 cy INSTALL TO A3"DEPTH Ung Soil wf extra sand 6-8" depth - I Stenotaphrum secundatum - St. Augustine 'Floritam' Sod INSTALL'FLORITAM'VARIETY AS SHOWN ON PLANS, QUANTITY IS ESTIMATED 0 j " ; "tj -ml loo- IF. NO.Nw .1k UIP11-1.44 NowporwIl"9011 " + Pmw f000inspection, fecs 073 mcmdat-If ar 0 LZA M A jwi SN 4 to 45 goyass v, 0 gj U UY. 61I� DSCAPE T i 'OR 11M ,min 50 livin( ALL A!"I %lb"IS "-"I WHHOUT THE 00N� 1",bMING DIREC'101� PLAN PP, ALL tANIDSCAPINI,37 TO BE PROTECTED , I D �' q T,"�' FRO%,,l VEH?Mic CULA zv� `AN TRAFFIC BY A HIGH CU',�� qv ic al Ic � I 0 r GF L JUL in D e G vc 4,4 v C E Z- G, Ic � I M In „_._ I 8 IrlLtrpre-Laiion OT ine mapped data. Extent of Tree Cono DBH of Tree in inche,,ms, -Tree Reference Number � sqnMiller) it 12 - SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST Base Drawing by WilsonMiller I — - I 0 �Court Street Project. a Me