410 FT HARRISON AVE NCITY OF CLEARWATER - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT
99�AiE14E��� I I �/ GPI t I- ii �tL-1 -
�JU
NAYDRESS OWNER %/kidL
SITE w*W —SO 6i
PHONE I Z,. - —40 & il
OWNER'S ADDRESS 35e-Z
LOCATION OF TREE(S) ON LOT
SPECIES AND NUMBER OF TREES)
RL�v,�i✓i�lla ��- /,Q� db��i�l�i
TO APPLICANT: A non -refuin le fee c
1 be removed, plus $3.
removed is required.
I Tarr ��
A) CONSTRUCTION
1. For new construction, additions or of
a site plan is required. This site plan must
site plan must include:
2�W&V'T U9AI
f) Aw
yt5 L- /5r, e:i)
15.0 car uD to five tree
e T TO
4 nT„3r
ice hs of a property w
a '
n.�
REASON FOR REMOVAL:
❑ Construction
•See "A" below
q Hazardous
Declining
❑ Dead
Z
O
❑ Other (Specify)
Fee Rec'd. $
�J
Date
G
oive the removal of a protected tree(s),
In le family lots, or 1 " =50' for all others. The
$
o�
a. Major Changes of Grade f. PropUe�lTur15 Fob aAil Protected Trees Including:
b. Structure Locations g. Proposed Underground Utilities (i.) Diameter of 4.5' above grade (DBH)
C, Driveways and Walks h. Zoning Setbacks (ii.) Surveyed Location
d. Parking Arrangement i. All easements and Rights -of -Way (iii.) Species
e. Required Number of Parking Spaces (iv.) Diseased or Insect Infested Trees
k. Tree Barricade Detail & Locations
2. Protective barriers are required around all trees remaining on site during construction. These barricades must remain
intact during construction. The barriers must meet City Specifications.
B) REPLACEMENTS
1. Tree replacement minimum standards: l0' overall height, 2.5" caliper, Florida Grade #1. See Inspectors note below to
determine the number of replacement trees required. Replacements required within 30 days.
I hereby certify that as property owner or as representative of the property owner, I have verified that the tree(s) sought
to be removed is wholly on property owned by the above - identified property owner, and should it be determined that
the tree(s) are located wholly or partially on property owned by some other person, then, I agree to hold the City of
Clearwater harmless in any claim made for wrongful removal of such tree(s). I hereby certify that this application together
with any plans submitted is a true representation of all facts concerning the proposed removal of the tree(s). Any deviation
from the permit iss shall nder it null and void and be considered a violation ofn Community Development Code.
Signature of o rler or appli ant Pri ted Name
Adarress Agency Representing OCL #
?.51 .72 2-37 -S
City State Zip Ph ne /Cell Fax
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - Not Valid- Until Signed By City Manaaer or his Desianated Aaent
ments:
Required Replacement Trees:
Applicable Code Section: __, s /zcfc�
0
Based on the Inspector's comments and inform ion submitted, the above removal application is:
❑ Approved as Submitted Approved- Modified as Noted Above ❑ Denied
Signed: � -' Date:
CommunikOevelopment Coordina r or Designee /Inspector Valid for six onths from the date of issuance.
1362.0001 -GC White - Planning & Development Services Yellow- Applicant Rev. 2 -03
b
C
D
Cn
D C
m C
BOEN'S TREE SERVICE 1
P.O. Box 86
Ozona, Fl., 34660 -0086
Tree inventory for Harrison Village and Island View Condominium
Site overview and. tree canopy analysis: The subject property consists of two parcels.
The first parcel is located west of North Osceola Avenue and is a natural bluff that slopes
to the shoreline of Clearwater Harbor. The property consists of two single family home
lots with old houses perched atop the bluff. The property contains relatively few of the
older native shade trees typical of the bluff environment. Many properties ringing the
bluff in Clearwater still retain mature specimen quality trees that pre- existed development
on the bluff. Native tree species that are common to the bluff include live oak (Quercus
virginiana), Southern red cedar (Juniperus silicicola) and pignut hickory (Carya glabra)
on the uplands and sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana) which grows on the slopes where
seepage creates a moist environment. Additionally, the native sabal palm (Sabal
palmetto) grows throughout the bluff. There were no trees inventoried that approached
specimen quality and only one tree, a 38" diameter live oak tree (rated in the inventory)
warrants consideration to alter the site design to preserve. Existing trees have suffered
from improper tree care and general neglect. Essentially all native understory vegetation
has been removed and exotic invasive species such as the Brazilian pepper (Schinus
terebinthifolius) tree and air potato vine (Dioscorea bulbifera) have colonized on the
property.
The second parcel inventoried is a mixed commercial/residential tract located between
North Fort Harrison Avenue and North Osceola Avenue and between Jones Street and
Georgia Street. This parcel has retained only a few of the mature live oak or hickory trees
such as those that are commonly observed flanking the Ft. Harrison corridor in
Clearwater. The parcel is for the most part characterized by younger second growth trees
or trees that have been planted for landscape purposes. The one commonality of the trees
growing on this parcel is that they have been poorly. maintained. Many shade tree species
have experienced flush and stub cuts or have been repeatedly topped: to the extent that
their structure is ruined. In addition, many trees have suffered from insufficient irrigation
and in some cases nutritional deficiencies. The native understory vegetation has been
removed and replaced by sod or common hedge plant species.
In summary, neither of the parcels supports trees or native vegetation of a quality that
enhances the uniqueness and beauty of the bluff environment while providing a
vegetative link to Clearwater's past. Consequently, the impact of development to either
site's urban forestry resources will be minimal.
Tree Inventory Data
The tree inventory provides a "snapshot" of the property and establishes a hierarchy of
ti existing trees to assist the site designer in the process of choosing trees to be incorporated
into the site design. The inventory includes the following information:
1. Tree location — Each tree is listed by a number that corresponds to the
same number physically located on the site plan indicating the location of
the tree in the field.
2. Tree size is expressed as diameter at breast height (DBH — the trunk
diameter measured at 4.5'above grade). If there is a fork at 4.5, the
measurement is taken at the narrowest point below the fork.
3. Tree species are shown by both common and botanical names the first
time listed in the inventory and only by common name thereafter.
4. The trees overall value rating ranks the tree on a scale of 0 -6 (half
increments are used to increase accuracy) based on the trees overall health
(condition). Factors such as the size, species and appearance are also
considered. An explanation of the overall value rating system is provided
below.
S. The crown spread for larger shade trees is shown as distance and
direction from the trunk (the crown spread is only shown within the
property lines).
6. The comment section provides commentary discussing specific points
both positive and negative of the subject tree.
NOTE: The Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius) and the punk tree (Melaleuca
quinquenervia) are invasive exotic trees that are recognized as category one ecological
pests by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council and consequently have been so
designated with an IE (invasive exotic) on the inventory and assigned a zero value in the
inventory. There are other trees such as the camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora) that
have also been recognized as ecological pests but have not been recognized as such in the
inventory as their degree of invasiveness is not as severe in the bluff environment in
Clearwater.
Rating System
0 — A dead tree.
1 — Trees that are dying, severely declining, or hazardous and trees designated by the
State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1 ecological pest, i.e.,
Brazilian pepper tree. A tree with a #1 rating should be removed.
2 — Trees exhibiting .serious structural defects (i.e., codominant stems with included
bark), large cavities, crown dieback, low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease
or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or pH related problems. A tree with a #2
rating should be removed unless the problems will be mitigated.
3 — Trees that have good overall structure, crown density and systemic health with
problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a #3 rating
should be preserved if possible.
4 — Trees with good structure and systemic health with problems that can easily be
corrected with minor maintenance. Trees should exhibit good form with above
average crown density. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or
other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if
they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. Trees with
a #4 rating should be preserved and warrant site plan modification for preservation.
5- Trees with high live crown ratio, exceptional structure, systemic health, good form
and free from any serious disease, insect problem or nutritional deficiency. A tree in
this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic qualities. Trees
with a #5 rating lend considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into
the site design.
6- Specimen tree — A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior
qualities relating to size, specie, form, uniqueness, structure, systemic health and
crown density. A specimen tree must be preserved and incorporated into a site design
with an undisturbed area equal to the tree's dripline.
r)
Tree# Size Species
Tree Inventory
Rating
C- ; 25" Laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia) 2.5
Crown spread
24' -N, 14' -S, 2l' -E, 15' -W
Comments: This tree has overall poor structure and an asymmetrical root flare due to the
presence of asphalt and a curb. The tree has experienced flush cuts that will cause cavities
to develop in the trunk and has old stub cuts present that will also promote decay..
Recommend removal.
11" Podocarpus (Podocarpus macrophyllus) 2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has stubs left on the tree and has poor overall structure.
3 = 20" Laurel oak 2.5 12' -N, 18' -S, 24' -E, 20' -W
Comments: This tree has a potentially hazardous codominant stem in the trunk 10' above
grade. The tree will experience structurally weakness due to previous flush cuts and small
cavities on the main leaders. It also has a thinning canopy with minor dieback occurring
in the upper crown. Recommend removal.
t4 - 3" Citrus (Citrus spp.) 2.0 N/A
Comments: Not protected under the City's tree ordinance due to size. This tree is poor
specimen - recommend removal.
5 -s 12" Camphor (Cinnamomum camphora) 2.0 12' =N, 5' -S, 18' -E, 0' -W
Comments: IE, This tree is one -sided with the canopy growing to the east. It has an
under- developed crown. Recommend removal.
J'-, 13" Podocarpus 2.0 N/A
Comments: Poor form, recommend removal.
7 = 25" Laurel oak 2.5 15' -N; 20' -S, 16' -E, 18' -W
Comments: This tree has a sparse crown and low energy. The upper crown has a large
percentage of dieback, recommend removal.
F8 -? 20" Laurel oak 2.5 18' -N, 15' -S, 20' -E, 20' -W
Comments: This tree has overall poor structure with a thinning crown and dieback in the
canopy. The tree has suffered from stub cuts and flush cuts and decay will increase in the
future. Recommend removal.
9 10" Podocarpus
1.0
Qrn
Comments: This tree is located on the property line and has poor structure and is covered
with vines. Recommend removal.
10. 16" Laurel oak 1.5 18' -N, 20' -E, 5' -W
Comments: This tree has large deadwood and vines in the canopy. Very poor tree overall,
recommend removal.
[11 7-' 23" Laurel oak
2.0 25' -N, 20' -E, 20' -W
Comments: This tree is located on the property line and has an asymmetrical base due to
the presence of a concrete slab on the north side. The tree also has a thinning canopy,
mistletoe, trunk cankers, crossing branches, surface roots and a large rebar imbedded in
the trunk. Recommend removal.
10" Laurel oak 1.5 5' -N, 0' -E, 20' -W
Comments: This tree is located on the property line and has very poor overall structure. It
is covered with vines and has a one -sided crown. Recommend removal.
F13 - 18" Laurel oak 2.5 14' -N, 22' -E, 15' -W
Comments: This tree is located on the property line and has poor structure with the root
flare located 6" from a 3'high retaining wall. The tree will cause problems in the future
due to its location.
14 =. 8" Podocarpus
2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has poor form. Recommend removal.
�15 -= 10" Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal.
Fl =, 10" Sabal palm ( Sabal palmetto) 2.0 N/A
Comments: Tree has 6' of clear trunk (C.T.) and is not protected by the City of
Clearwater's Tree Protection Ordinance which protects palms with a clear trunk of 10' or
greater. This tree is growing under the canopy of an adjacent 38" diameter live oak tree.
Recommend removal.
1 - 38" Live oak (Quercus virginiana) 4.0 28 " -N, 22' -S, 20' -E, 29' -W
Comments: This tree has above average structure with minor basal decay on the
southwest side and an old wound that is closing on the west side. The tree has a healthy
systemic system and average crown density. The tree is pushing over a 4' high retaining
wall. This is a good tree and warrants consideration for preservation. If the tree is
incorporated into the site design, the original grades will have to be maintained through
new retaining walls.
2 -10" Jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia) 2.0 18' -N, 25' -E, 12' -W
Comments: This tree is on the property line and has a codominant stem low in the trunk.
This species is weak wooded and susceptible to periodic freeze damage. It could be
preserved for aesthetic amenities (only blue flowering tree).
19 14" Camphor 1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is on the property line and has been severely topped. The structure
is permanently ruined. Recommend removal.
20 — Row of Pittosporum (Pittosporum tobira) 3.5 N/A
Comments: A row of mature pittosporum is located near the south property line and
provides screening from the adjacent property. If pruned they will provide both a
functional and aesthetic amenity.
21'= Brazilian pepper cluster 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal.
[ 22`r Brazilian pepper cluster 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal
3 ? Senegal date palm cluster (Phoenix reclinata) 2.5 N/A
Comments: Multi -stem cluster with 8 -9' of clear trunk. The palms have been neglected
and need pruning. An adjacent oak tree is interfering with the crown development. Could
prune oak to accommodate the palm cluster or move on site. If palm cluster will not be
utilized contact a palm broker who may be willing to purchase.
(Z) Live oak 3.0 20' -N, 20' -S, 15'- E,18' -W
Comments: This tree is systemically healthy and has average structure and canopy. The
tree is covered with vines and could be a good tree with pruning and vine removal.
25`x- Senegal date palm cluster 3.5 N/A
,5
Comment There is minor damage from bird pecking on one trunk but could be an asset
if cleaned up,
X2`6 29" Laurel oak 2.0 18' -N, 26' -S, 23' -E, 18' -W
Comments: This tree has minor basal decay, a thinning canopy and large deadwood. It
also has poor structure and a heavy vine infestation. Recommend removal.
27 ; 9 ",17" Live oak 1.5 N/A
Comments: Severe dieback and decline. Recommend removal..
2 :, - 18" Southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora) 1.5 15' -N, 15' -S, 10' -E, 14' -W
This tree has, a severely thinning canopy with a high percentage of dead wood. It is also
covered with vines. Recommend removal.
291�- 6" Laurel oak
1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has severe dieback and virtually no crown. Recommend removal.
30 =' 6" Laurel oak 1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is severely declining and should be removed.
31 ` 40" Laurel oak 1.5 16' -N, 24' -S, 20' -E, 14' -W
Comments: This tree has extremely poor structure and heavy dieback on the west side.
Recommend removal.
r321: 6" Citrus
2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has severe crown dieback. Recommend removal.
10 Sabal palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has a heavy vine infestation but will be a good palm once vines are
removed.
34 - 10" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A
Comments: This tree has heavy vine infestation but will be a good palm once vines are
removed.
35`- 20" Camphor
2.0 15' -N, 20 %S, 14' -E, 10' -W
Comments: This tree has a codominant stem at the base and has dieback and branch
stubs. It is also infested with vines. Recommend removal.
36 - 23" Mango (Mangifera indica) 2.0
N/A
Comments: This tree has a codominant stem 3' above grade, damage from past freezes, a
cavity in one leader and steel imbedded in the trunk. Recommend removal.
C7,,- 14" Hickory (Carya glabra)
2.5 20' -N, 0' -S, 12' -E, 10' -W
Comments: This tree has a misshaped one -sided crown. It is systemically healthy and is
growing 1' from a retaining wall. Could be preserved if pruned and retaining wall is
removed and present grade maintained.
'3- 35" Live oak 3.5 26' -N, 15' -S, 25' -E, 14' -W
Comments: This tree is overall systemically healthy but has minimal dieback. It has
above average structure and needs to have vines removed. It is located 6" from a concrete
retaining wall. This tree is worthy of preservation but the retaining wall will have to be
removed and the present grade maintained.
39. 7" Cherry laurel (Prunus caroliniana) 2.0
N/A
Comments: This tree has very poor form and is growing beneath the canopy of tree # 38..
Recommend removal.
404" Holly (Ilex attenuata `East Palatka') 3.5 12' -N, 12' -S, 12'-E, 12'-W
Comments: This tree has an attractive form and is in good condition but prone to
infestation from Sphaeropsis Knot disease.
41 = Podocarpus 0 N/A
Comments: Dead tree, remove.
�4Z' 26" Laurel oak 3.0 26' -N, 24' -S, 14' -E, 22' -W
Comment: This tree has a codominant trunk 15' above grade that Could be strengthened
with cabling and bracing. The tree needs pruning to improve structure and is growing 1'
foot from house and 4' from retaining wall. Recommend preservation if maintained.
43 _ - Sabal palm 0 N/A
Comments: No clear trunk — remove.
F44�- 6" Podocarpus 2.5 N/A
Comments- Below average form, recommend removal.
45 = 10" Sabal palm 2.0 N/A
Comments: This palm has 4' of clear trunk and is not a protected tree by City ordinance.
Recommend removal.
46 30" Live oak 3.0 28' -N, 22' -S, 26' -E, 21' -W
Comments: This tree has a thinning crown with 15% dieback and is covered with vines. It
could be preserved but will require substantial pruning.
47 '- 38" Ficus ( Ficus spp.) N/A N/A
Comments: This tree is located on the adjacent property to the north. It is a poor
specimen but its root system should be protected during construction to prevent further
decline.
a- 12" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A
Comments: Good palm with gentle curve in trunk. Recommend removing vines and
preserve palm or transplant on site.
49, - 12" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A
Comments: Tall palm with healthy crown. Recommend preserving.
010 - 10' Sabal palm 4.5 N/A
Comments: Located just north of property line. Protect during - construction.
D- 10" Sabal palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: Located off property line, protect during construction.
t52' 10" Saba] palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: Good palm, remove vines and preserve if possible.
(::5> 12" Laurel oak 3.0 8' -N, 18' -S, 12' -E, 16' -W
Comments: This tree has a one -sided crown but has good structure and systemic health.
Remove vines if tree will be preserved.
(54 )- 10" Sabal palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: Located on property line, good palm, preserve if possible.
55- 12 stem Senegal date palm 3.5 N/A
o
07
Comments: This palm cluster has been neglected and needs heavy maintenance to restore
appearance. However, it could be a very valuable addition to the site landscaping.
[56ti15" Brazilian pepper cluster 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal.
57 — 12" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A
Comments: Good palm, worthy of preservation.
58 —12" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A
Comments: Good palm, worthy of preservation.
59 ~ Brazilian pepper cluster 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal.
!�Oy 6" Hickory 3.0 10' -S
Comments: Located on adjacent property, protect during construction.
61; 40" Punk tree (Melaleuca quinquenervia) 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal.
62. = 37" Punk tree 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal.
4" Hickory 3.0 N/A
Comments: Tree is located on the property line at the northeast corner of the property and
is growing beneath the canopy of an adjacent oak tree.
64 - 14" Live oak 3.0 18' -N, 16' -S, 10' -E, 16' -w
Comments: This tree has a one -sided crown and several large stubs. It is located 1' from
a building foundation. It has good structure but will probably have to be removed due to
proposed demolition.
66 Senegal date palm cluster N/A N/A
Comments: Palm stems have 1' of clear trunk and are not protected by City ordinance.
The cluster could be moved and allowed to grow.
6 b -11" Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta) 3.0 NIA
Comments: Palm is located on the street right of way and belongs to the City of
Clearwater. All trees growing in City rights of way should be protected during
construction. If a tree needs maintenance or removal contact the City's Urban
forestry Division @ 562 -4950 x7220.
67 - 11" Washington palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: Palm is located on street right of way.
68� 12" Washington palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: Tree is located on street right of way.
C93-1 0" Norfolk Island pine (Araucania heterophylla) 3.5 N/A
Comments: Attractive tree with good form and overall health. This tree is susceptible to
freeze damage and should only be preserved if it is desired in the proposed landscape
theme.
70 --)Y Live oak
2.5
N/A
Comments: Tree is not protected under City code due to size. It has an underdeveloped
crown and is growing beneath trees # 69 &71. Recommend removal.
71` -10" Live oak
Qj
3.0 15' -N, 12' -S, 13' -E, 12' -W
Comments: This tree has poor structure but good systemic health. It has a codominant
stem that can be mitigated through subordinate pruning.
Q72� 28" Live oak
3.5 33' -N, 36' -S, 31' -E, 12' -W
Comments: This tree is located on the City right of way and has a codominant stem on
the southwest side with included bark. Tree is pushing out curb and has a girdling root,
deadwood, and dead palm stump next to the trunk — all should be removed. Call City to
perform required maintenance.
73'- 40" Live oak 4.0 25' -N, 39' -S, 27' -E, 30' -W
Comments: This tree has good structure and average systemic health. The crown is not
developed on the north side due to competition from tree #74. Good tree — preserve if
possible.
. r- 50" Live oak 3.5 36' -N, 24' -S, 37' -E, 28' -W
Comments: This tree is located on the City right of way and has a codominant 3.5' above
grade but it has a wide crotch with the branch bark ridge present. The west side of the
tree has minor damage at the root flare and basal decay that is not debilitating. The
systemic system is healthy. The tree's root system has broken the curb which could be
repaired by City crews. The crown is open and aesthetically appealing. This tree
compliments tree # 73, protect during construction.
6" Slash pine (Pinus ellioud) 3.0 7' radius all directions
Comments: This tree is systemically healthy but has a sparse crown. Could be preserved
and appearance will improve with proper care.
(76,x- 6" Slash pine 3.0 7' radius in all directions
Continents: See comments for tree # 75 above.
(77,- 13" Crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) 5.0 N/A
Z
Comments: This is a beautiful tree with a full well developed crown. It has no diseases or
insect problems and would lend aesthetic qualities to this site. Recommend preservation.
78 10" Washington palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: This palm is located on the right of way and has an interesting crook in the
trunk. Protect during construction.
6" Live oak
2.0
N/A
Comments: This tree is located in a buffer strip and has been topped (lollipop). It is also
growing under a rack of utility wires. Recommend replacing with an accent tree.
80 -; 6" Live oak 2.0 N/A
Comments: See comments for tree # 79.
C81-;- 8" Crape myrtle 3.5 N/A
\J 2
Comments — This tree is growing in an interior landscape island. It has an attractive
crown and is healthy. Minor decay is present from improper pruning at base. This tree
will develop into a good tree if cared for properly.
C2,— 8" Crape myrtle 3.5 N/A
2
Comments: See comments for tree # 81.
X83 ~ -, 15" Laurel oak 2.5 20' -N, 15' -S, 15' -E, 2' -W
Comments: This tree has a good systemic health but has a one sided crown due to
competition from adjacent tree. It is growing 6" from building wall. Recommend
removal.
54,-' 14" Laurel oak
2.5 19' -N, 18' -S, 2' -E, 9' -W
Comments: This tree is located 1.5' from building and will develop basal decay from
injury. Recommend removal.
85 ---17" Laurel oak
2.5 15' -N, 16' -S, 10' -E, 16' -W
Comments: This tree has good structure and systemic health but two 7" long flush cuts on
leader will cause serious decay. If preserved it will have to be periodically monitored.
86 - 42" Live oak
4.5 27' -W, 40' -S, 48' -E, 42' -W
Comments: This tree has a large spreading crown with good systemic health except for a
thinning upper center crown. It has minor dieback and deadwood. If tree is properly
pruned it would be worthy of shifting structures to incorporate into site plan design.
Recommend preservation.
[8T _� 23" Camphor
2.0 10' -N, 21' -S, 15' -E, 16' -W
Comments: This tree has two fissures in trunk from crotch to the base that will
compromise the structural integrity of the tree. It also has poor form. Recommend
removal.
88 = 25" Live oak
3.0 39'-N, 27' -S, 28' -E, 24' -W
Comments: This tree has an irregular form and is suffering from previous poor pruning. It
could develop into a better tree with proper maintenance.
8 22" Live oak
3.0 0' -N, 36' -S, 24' -E, 24' -W
Comments: This tree has a pronounced lean to the south due to competition from tree
#90. The trunk has a corkscrew effect and tree has a large stub and heavy moss. This tree
needs proper pruning. It could be preserved as a stand with trees #88, 89 & 90.
90 24" Live oak
3.0 T -N, 21' -S, 15' -E, 24' -W
Comments: This tree has a narrow crown due to competition from adjacent trees. It has a
large stub that needs removal and heavy moss.
15" Hickory 3.5 5' =N, 23' -S, 16' -E, 24' -W
Comments: This tree has a lean to the south due to competition from tree #92. It has good
crown density and systemic health. It has surface roots and is growing 3' from adjacent
hickory. Preserve if possible.
92� - 15" Hickory
3.5 22' -N, 7' -S, 12' -E, 22' -W
This tree has an arrow straight trunk with good structure and crown density. Preserve
along with adjacent hickory, tree# 91, if possible.
C93 -7 5" Hickory
2.0
N/A
Comments: This tree is growing beneath the canopy of tree # 92. It has poor structure.
Recommend removal.
94 - 14" Hickory
3.5 18' -N, 12' -S, 24' -E, 10' -W
Comments: One sided crown to east due to competition. Good structure and systemic.
health. Utility wires are growing through canopy. Good tree to preserve, especially if
wires will be relocated.
(?:5,,7 13" Laurel oak
2.0 12' -N, 15' -S, 8' -E, 16' -W
Comments: This tree has poor form and minor damage to root flare on the southwest side.
It has a large cavity in crotch with sporophores present. It is growing 1' from parking lot
edge. Recommend removal.
96f= 30" Live oak
4.5 15' -N, 36' -S, 16' -E, 27' -W
Comments: This tree has good structure and crown density and an exceptional systemic
system. It is growing into the edge of the parking lot. This tree should be preserved but
will need the pavement to be saw -cut to accommodate the expanding root flare.
79" Crape myrtle 3.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has a symmetrical crown and good systemic health but is growing
under tree #96. It could be preserved with minor pruning. on the oak to accommodate the
crown.
Ng_� 9" Crape myrtle
3.5
N/A
Comments: A good tree with symmetrical crown and above average systemic health.
99 8" Crape myrtle
2.5
N/A
Comments: This tree has a below average crown and systemic health but would improve
With a program of watering and fertilization.
100 ,6" Multi - stemmed Wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) 2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has considerable dieback and decay in the trunks. Recommend
removal.
101 — 9" Crape myrtle
2
3.0
N/A
Comments: Tree is in overall good shape but has minor decay at base where stems were
removed.
1 2 10" Crape myrtle 4.0 N/A
2
Comments: A multi - stemmed tree with a full healthy crown. Recommend preservation.
1031 -10" Sabal palm — 8' Clear trunk (C.T.) 3.0
N/A
Comments: This palm is growing in a raised planter along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue.
Planter is too small for this tree. Recommend removal.
104 —;8" Queen Palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana) 2.0 N/A
Comments: This palm is in the same planter as tree # 103. Recommend removal.
105 13" Saba] palm 9'C.T.
3.5
N/A
Comments: In planter, good tree — could preserve or transplant on site.
106'' -13" Sabal palm 9' C.T. 3:5 N/A
Comments: See comments for tree # 105.
coi -12" Sabal palm 8' C.T. 3.5 . N/A
Comments: This palm is a healthy specimen with a good appearance. It is located in a
landscape buffer located between a parking lot and N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. It is growing
with trees # 105, 106 & 108. Recommend preserving all of these palms.
lO' - 14" Saba] palm 6' C.T. 3.0 N/A
Comments: See remarks for tree # 107.
1 9 11" Sabal palm 10' C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: This is a healthy palm that is located in a landscape buffer along N. Ft.
Harrison Avenue. It is located in a row with trees # 110, 111, & 112. The buffer is
conducive to a palm landscape. Recommend preservation.
001 -13" Sabal palm 9' C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: See comments for tree # 109.
111 ' =11" Sabal palm 2.5 N/A
Comments: This palm has a small crown and has pits on the trunk. Recommend replacing
with a new sabal palm to blend in with trees # 109 & 110 if they are preserved.
11—,, 11" Live oak
2.0
N/A
Comments: This tree has poor structure with two codominant stems at the main fork
located 6' above the grade. It is in a planter too small to accommodate its future growth.
Recommend removal.
1.1- 12" Sabal palm 9' C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: This palm along with trees # 114 & 115 are all growing in a planter between
a parking lot and N. Ft. Harrison Avenue and are in very good condition. As the buffer is
sure to remain they can be used to meet buffer landscape requirements. Recommend
preservation of all three.
114.. -12" Sabal palm 10' C.T. 4.0 N/A
Comments: See comments for tree # 113.
1- 13" Sabal palm 8' C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: See comments for tree # 113.
Note: Recommend a landscape of sabal palms along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue tying trees #
103, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 113, 114 & 115 together and fill in the gaps with new
sabal palms.
116_ Brazilian pepper 0 N/A
Comments; 1E, Recommend removal.
1� 17 = 5" Live oak
1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has been repeatedly topped. Recommend removal.
1 1= 5" Live oak 1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has been repeatedly topped. Recommend removal.
119_= 6" Live oak 1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has been repeatedly topped. Recommend removal.
20'::- 12" Sabal palm 8' C.T. 3.0 N/A
Comments: This is a good palm but is growing against the building and cannot be
transplanted. Recommend removal.
1217= 5" Hickory 3.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is growing in a parking lot island and has been topped — but with
proper pruning will regain good structure. Recommend preservation.
122,— 35" Laurel oak 2.5 27' -N, 25' -S, 35' -E, 30' -W
Comments: This tree has a dense crown and a healthy systemic system but is loaded with
stub cuts. It also has cavities in two of the leaders and one leader has been stubbed. It has
poor structure with 6 codominant leaders emanating from the main crotch, with a canker
beneath. Recommend removal.
123 8" Multi - stemmed (6) Crape myrtle. 2.5 N/A
Comments: This tree has below average crown. Could be removed or preserved if
maintained properly to restore.
T241- 10" Crape myrtle 3.0 N/A
2
Comments: This tree has an average crown that will improve if incorporated into a
maintained landscape.
125-10" Crape myrtle 3.0 N/A
2
Comments: Trees # 123, 124 & 125 are a cluster growing in a landscape planter at the
corner of Jones Street and N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. They could be used for landscaping
and will improve with proper maintenance. Recommend preservation.
1267– 5" Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) 3.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is growing in a retention pond adjacent to Jones Street and has been
previously topped along with trees # 127 & 131. Proper pruning can restore the structure.
Recommend preservation if retention pond will remain.
127 – 6" Bald cypress 3.0 N/A
Comments: See comments for tree #126.
@R,– Sabal palm 6' C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: Good palm growing on the top of bank of retention pond. Recommend
preservation.
129 1" Sabal palm 5' C.T.
M
N/A
Comments: Good palm on top of bank of retention pond. Recommend preservation.
(30 '; 9" Live oak
2.0
N/A
Comments: This tree is located on the slope of the retention pond and has poor structure
with a codominant stem 3' above grade. Recommend removal.
131 7" Bald cypress 3.0 N/A
Comments: See comments for tree # 126.
132 –19" Live oak 3.5 27' -N, 26' -S, 40' -E, 5' -W
Comments: This tree has a lean to the east due to competition from tree # 133. The tree
has good crown density, a healthy systemic system and good structure. Recommend
preservation.
13-3–',, 16" Laurel oak 1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is severely declining and has dieback in leaders with sporophores
present on the trunk. The upper crown is mostly dead. Recommend removal.
134 73" Live oak 1.5 N/A
Comments: This tree is growing in a landscape buffer near Jones Street and has been
severely topped and is in poor condition. Recommend removal.
r115 – 24" Jacaranda
2.0 22'-N, 24' -S, 25' -E, 20' -W
Comments: This tree is located 2' from the edge of the parking lot pavement. It has decay
in several leaders and some leaders have been previously topped. The tree also has large
surface roots, deadwood and stubs. Recommend removal.
13 14" Arbor vitae (Platycladus orientalis) 2.5
N/A
Comments: This tree has an average crown that has been somewhat suppressed by tree #
135. The foliage on the west side is sparse and detracts from appearance.
137 – 5" Live oak 1.5 N/A
L%
Comments: This tree is located in a parking lot island and has been repeatedly topped and
has poor structure. Recommend removal.
138 — 6" Crape myrtle 2.5 N/A
Comments: This tree has nutrient deficiencies, has been pruned too hard and has a poor
appearance. Recommend removal or treatment to improve overall health.
139.' 10" Sabal palm 1" C.T. 1.0 N/A
I—
Comments: This palm is growing against the building and cannot be transplanted.
Recommend removal.
140` 30" Hickory
1.5 24' -N, 27' -S, 30' -E, 22' -W
Comments: The upper crown of this tree is dead. Recommend removal.
141 % – 5" Laurel oak
2.0
N/A
Comments: This tree is growing in a narrow area between a building and the sidewalk.
There is no room for the canopy to develop. Recommend removal. -
1 4 11" Washington palm
3.0
N/A
Comments: Tall palm growing in the City right of way. Bark has sloughed off in some
spots and needs pruning. Protect during construction.
143' -10" 12- stemmed Crape myrtle 2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has poor form due to competition from other trees. Recommend
removal.
1( 44 J— 20" Live oak 3.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is growing in a tight area between two buildings. It has stubs and
the bark.on the lower east side is sloughing off. Paint has been sprayed on the trunk. It
has a good systemic system but an irregular crown. This is a borderline tree that could be
removed or preserved if maintained.
145. 18" 4 trunk Podocarpus 3.0
N/A
Comments: This tree has good form and appearance but is growing against a building. It
can be preserved after demolition.
146 --5" Live oak 1.5 N/A
Comments: This tree has no 'form due to competition from adjacent tree. Recommend
removal.
147' =j 24" Schefflera (Schefj`lera actinophylla) 0.5 N/A
Comments: This is a weak wooded tree with decay present. Recommend removal.
148 15" Cherry laurel
1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is severely declining with large deadwood. It is a hazardous tree and
should be removed.
149 12" Sabal palm 9' C.T.
3.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is healthy with an average crown. Recommend preservation.
150 —13" Sabal palm 20' C.T.
3.0 N/A
Comments: This would be a very good palm but the crown has been pruned back to
accommodate adjacent power wires. Recommend transplanting on site.
7" Golden rain tree (Koelreuteria elegans) 2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is growing into the wires and has a lop -sided crown. Recommend
removal.
152 —15" Golden rain tree
2.5 5' -N, 10' -S, 8' -E, 16' -W
Comments: This tree has a large cavity developing in the base and is growing into the
wires. It has poor form and should be removed.
1513" Golden rain tree 2.5 N/A
Comments: This tree has an irregular crown and a cavity in the trunk 2' above the grade.
It has poor form and should be removed.
1 8" Cherry laurel 2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has virtually no crown formation. Recommend removal
X155 =15" Cherry laurel 2.0 6' -N, 21' -S, T -E, 12' -W
Comments: This tree has decay in the trunk and mistletoe in the crown. Recommend
removal.
I =15" Cherry laurel 1.5 N/A
Comments: This tree has a wound on the trunk, mistletoe in the crown. The crown is
thinning and dying back. Recommend. removal.
q57--,,- Jacaranda 2.0 34' -N, 28'' -S, 9' -E, 15' -W
Comments: This tree has a large cavity at the base on the southwest side and a small
cavity on the east side. It has a codominant stem with included bark in the main crotch.
Recommend removal.
158 —15" sabal palm 8' C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: Tree is growing in the Osceola street right of way. It is a good palm, protect
during construction.
159 — 20" Saba1 palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: This palm has a lean to the west due to the presence of a three story house.
Recommend preserving at its present location or transplant on site.
160 —16' hickory 3.0 18' -N, 14' -S, 15' -E, 15' -W
Comments: This tree is growing 1' from a house but has good crown density and a
healthy systemic system. It can develop into a good tree with proper pruning.
Recommend preservation.
BOEN'S TREE SERVICE
P.O. Box 86
Ozona, Fl., 34660 -0086
Tree Inventory - Prepared for Triangle Development Inc:
To: Mr. Thomas Coates, Triangle Development Inc.
Re: Tree Inventory: 312 — 404 North Osceola Avenue
4/5/2005 '4� V
Site overview and canopy analysis '
The following report is submitted by Boen's Tree Service, Inc., and includes findings that we believe are accurate based on our education,
experience and knowledge in the field of Arboriculture. Boen's Tree Service has no interest personally or financially in this property and our
report is factual and unbiased. This report is the property of Triangle Development Inc., and will not be given to other entities unless so directed.
Site Overview and Canopy Analysis
The subject property is located on a bluff that slopes down to the shoreline of Clearwater Harbor and has historically been utilized for single
family homes. The site has been essentially cleared of all old growth trees and native mid -story and understory vegetation. The tree canopy is
comprised of second growth native tree species typical of the bluff environment and dominated by live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak
(Quercus laurifolia), pignut hickory (Carya glabra) and the native sabal palm (Sabal palmetto). The invasive exotic Brazilian pepper tree
(Schinus terebinthifolius) has colonized throughout the site forming dense thickets close to the shoreline. The inter -tidal zone supports a moderate
population of mangroves including red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle), black mangrove (Avicennia germinans) and white mangrove
(Laguncularia racemosa). The site's understory vegetation is an admixture of ornamental shrubs, grasses and vines.
The site supports few high quality trees but is laden with valuable palms including picturesque mature sabal palms and two potential high quality
clusters of the Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata). The preservation of the high quality palms should be a priority. The palms can be
preserved in place or transplanted on site. The overall condition of the site trees is below average as they reflect general neglect and improper
maintenance. Several trees have suffered from natural stresses including wind damage, drought, lightning and vine accumulations in the crown.
In addition, numerous trees had poor form and weak structure. This site does not contain trees of the quality that would warrant major site plan
modification to ensure their preservation. There are however, trees that are sufficient in health, structure and appearance that should be preserved
if possible. The ultimate purpose of a tree inventory is to provide the development team a hierarchy of existing trees by identifying the trees and
palms most worthy of preservation. The criteria used for evaluating individual trees are described in the following narrative.
Tree Inventory Data
A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove
trees with problems that could lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four codes and also has a
comment section. The following is an explanation of the inventory data:
Tree# - location - Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the
location of the tree in the field.
Size — Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is
measured at the narrowest area below the fork.
Species — Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its
common name thereafter.
Condition Ratine — The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. Elements of structure
include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments, i.e., well
spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs.
included bark.
Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used).
A tree with good systemic health will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree as needed. Indicators
of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its
mass), 2) crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the tree is making and storing energy.
The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0 -6 with 0 being a
dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as follows:
0- A dead tree
1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest
Plant Council as a category #1 ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). A tree with a rating of 1 should be removed as
it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage.
2 — A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with included bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of
decayed wood, crown dieback, cracked/split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low energy, low live crown ratio,
serious disease or insect problems,' nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems, A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the
problem(s) can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade
of the condition rating.
3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a
codominant stem not in the basal area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon have included bark can
be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible.
4- A tree with a rating of 4 has.good structure and systemic health with minor problems that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The
tree should have an attractive appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above
average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating
can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of 4 is
valuable to the property and should be preserved.
5 — A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free.of insect or disease problems or
nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should
be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends
considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is worthy of significant site plan
modification to ensure its preservation.
6 — A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength,
crown density, live crown ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness. A great effort should be
made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an
undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an experienced and competent International Society of
Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree.
Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not covered in the inventory data or expands on information
in the inventory data. It may include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It may also have
recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree.
NOTE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3 -5 years. However, .events such as drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze,
improper maintenance and severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial maintenance can upgrade the
value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely affected have the tree inspected by a qualified International Society of Arboriculture
(ISA) Certified Arborist.
* * * * * * * * * * * * ** NOTE: This inventory was performed on March 29 & 30 and at that time deciduous trees such as the pignut hickory (Carya
glabra) had no foliage present and trees such as the evergreen live oak (Quercus virginiana) and semi- evergreen laurel oak (Quercus
laurifolia)trees were in flower (catkins) and had very little foliage present. The systemic health and live crown ratio was determined by the
presence and concentration of flowers and leaf buds. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Tree Inventory
Tree# Size Species Rating Crown Spread
30" red bay (Persea borbonia.) 2.0
Comments: This tree's crown is composed of four large scaffold branches two of which have severe dieback and large dead wood and will need
to be removed. The deadwood is over the public sidewalk and constitutes a hazard. The tree is in an overall state of decline and should be
removed.
12" podocarpus ( Podocarpus macrophyllus) 3.0 6' radius
Comments: This tree has a codominant stem with included bark in the upper crown but it is not considered a hazard in this species. This tree has
an attractive crown and could be preserved.
9" laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia) 3.0 13'N, 12'S, 15'E, 14'W
Comments:
4 4 ", 5" arborvitae (Thuja orientalis) 2.0
Comments: This tree is growing between the steps of the house's porch and has no crown on the west side. The tree has very poor aesthetic
appeal.
NOTE: All tree species identified as invasive exotic trees on the category #1 list published by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council will
be given a rating of 1.5 or less and recommended for removal.
5 8" camphor (Cinnamomum camphora) 1.5
Comments: Invasive exotic.
10" laurel oak 3.0 10'N, 79S, 9'E, 12'W
Comments: n/a
7 8" laurel oak 2.5
Comments: This tree has a mistletoe infestation on two branches and has flush cuts on the trunk that will cause decay. This tree also has a
codominant stem in the scaffold branches of the crown that down grades the tree. Recommend removal.
*8 6' Canary Island palm (Phoenix canariensis) 3.0
Comments: *This palm is not protected by City code as it has less than 10' of clear trunk. However, it is healthy and could be utilized in the site
�landscaping and if maintained properly will evolve into a good palm. This palm could be preserved in place or transplanted on site.
nd
�9 j 12' C.T. sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 3.0 6' radius
10 13' C.T. queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana) 3.5 6' radius
Comments:
1 � 39" live oak (Quercus virginiana) 3.5 20' N, 40'S, 33'E, 2 F
Comments: n/a
12 4" pignut hickory (Carya glabra) 2.5
Comments: This tree is young and healthy but is growing directly into the lateral branches of tree #11 and has no where for the crown to grow.
13 6" hickory 2.0
Comments: The crown of this tree has been smothered by vines and the live crown ratio is very low.
14 40" strangler fig (Ficus aurea) 1.5
Comments: This native ficus tree is a menace to properties as it can reach a width of 90' and produce massive surface roots that damage
pavements and other structures. Recommend removal.
15 18' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: n/a
16 15' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 6'. radius
Comments: n/a
17 20' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: n/a
18 7" camphor 1.5
Comments: category #1 invasive exotic
28" live oak 3.0 30'N, 25'S, 35'W, WE
Comments: This tree has a sound trunk, root flare and very good overall structure. The down grading factor of this tree is the below average live
crown ratio and twig dieback. It is difficult to pinpoint the source of the dieback but it could be a combination of root loss, wind damage from
last year's severe storms and a vine infestation. Even minimal impact to the root system from new construction will adversely affect this tree.
This tree is only recommended for preservation if a rooting area equal to the dripline formula can be provided. This tree's crown is one -sided to
the west.
20 16' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius
Comments, n/a
21 7 ", 79', 6 ", 6 ", 599, 4 ", 4" laurel oak 1.0
Comments: This tree has seven stems that emerge from a single trunk and they are all codominant to one another l' above grade. This type of
attachment is a prescription for future failure and cannot be corrected through pruning. The tree has very good systemic health but the structure is
severe, recommend removal.
22 14' C.T. sabal palm
5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm is at the shoreline and has a sweeping trunk. It would provide high aesthetic value. Recommend preservation.
23 13' C.T. saW palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: See comment for #22.
24 10' C.T. sabal palm 2.5
Comments: This palm has a trunk restriction 7' above grade and the crown has been impacted by Brazilian pepper trees. This palm could be
preserved however and the condition should improve when the pepper trees are removed.
25* < 10' C.T. cluster Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata) n/a
Comments`. This palm cluster does not have a stem with at least 10' of clear trunk and therefore is not protected by city code. However, it is
identified in the inventory because it is healthy and has high aesthetic appeal and commercial value. The palm has not been pruned but once
pruned and maintained properly should evolve into a landscape centerpiece.
(-367__; 28" live oak 3.0 20'N, 30'S, 24'E, 26'W
Comments: This tree is covered with vines. The structure is above average but the down grading factor is the below average live crown ratio. The
crown has dieback and deadwood but if pruned will improve in appearance. Recommend preservation only if a rooting area equal to the dripline
formula is provided.
10' C.T. sabal palm .
�C— o�mments: n/a
28 20" red bay
3.0 6' radius
3.5 30'N, 34'S, 28'E, 0'W
Comments: A one -sided tree that needs pruning to improve the appearance. It has good structure and above average live crown ratio.
29 " 12" laurel oak
3.0 0'N, 15 "S, IO'E,,ITS
Comments: This tree has a one -sided crown with very good live crown ratio and overall structure: The trunk is growing 6" from a sabal palm and
2' from an oak to the north. If the sabal palm and oak tree were removed this tree would evolve into a good tree.
30 26' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm is downgraded because it is growing against an oak tree trunk for 5' above grade. It cannot be transplanted and will likely
be injured when the oak is removed. However, if the oak is removed very carefully this palm could stay and would be upgraded as it is a beautiful
palm.
31 18" ! laurel oak 2.5
Comments: This tree is growing in competition with tree #29 and palm #30. The palm is actually growing against the trunk and causing a slight
indentation. This tree has below average upper crown structure and poor form and is downgraded accordingly. If this tree is carefully removed
the palm could be preserved.
32 cluster ear tree (Enterolobium cyclocarpa) 0.5
Comments: This exotic tree species is highly undesirable as the wood is very brittle and it shears readily in high winds. In addition, the ear tree
has weak roots and is prone to uplift completely during severe weather. Recommend removal.
Q,' 27" hickory 4.5 25'N, 21'S, 24'E, 30'W
Comments: This tree was completely bare when it was assessed however, it had an extremely high concentration of leaf buds indicating
high live crown ratio. The overall structure is very good. The tree needs pruning to remove stubs and minor deadwood. Recommend preservation.
34 14" cherry laurel (Prunus caroliniana) 1.5
Comments: This tree has decay in the trunk and upper scaffold branches. It is in an overall state of decline and should be removed.
35 4" citrus (Citrus spp.) 1.0
Comments: This tree has a fungus disease that is causing decline. It is irreversible and the tree needs to be removed.
36 20' C.T. queen palm 3.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
37 23" laurel oak 1.0
Comments: This tree has a large cavity in the main crotch that has weakened the crotch and predisposed it to failure. The tree is a hazard and a
threat to fail. Remove as soon as possible.
38 8" camphor 1.5 .
Comments: Category #1 invasive exotic
39 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
40 12" laurel oak 3.0 15'N, 13'S, 15'E, 14'W
Comments: This tree has a symmetrical crown with above average overall structure. The live crown ratio is good. This tree could evolve into a
good tree if preserved and maintained properly.
41 10" Chinaberry (Melia azedarach) 0.5
Comments: This tree has very poor form and structure as it has been topped. In addition, it is a category #1 invasive exotic. Recommend removal.
42 5" chinaberry 0.5
Comments: category #1 invasive exotic
43 6" red bay 2.0
Comments: This tree has very poor structure and form. Recommend removal.
25' C.T. queen palm 4.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm is a very good palm but is growing 2' from the existing house and will need to be protected during demolition if the palm
is to be preserved.
45. <10' C.T.Canary Island palm n/a
Comments: This palm has only 4' of clear trunk and as such is not protected by city code. However, it has a beautiful crown and could be
preserved in place or moved on site. Recommend preservation.
46 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: This palm is growing against the foundation of the house and will be very hard to preserve.
7 20' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: n/a
48 27" live oak 4.0 45'N, 42'S, 25'E, 45'W
Comments: This tree has a good root flare and trunk. In addition, it has good form and structure in the upper crown. The most downgrading
factor is that large diameter branches have been stubbed off on the east side due to the presence of utility wires. The stubs need to be removed.
However, this is a very good overall tree. Recommend preservation.
49 12" cherry laurel 2.5
Comments' This tree is starting to show dieback in the crown and it has a damaging girdling root at the base.
50 8" cherry laurel 2.0
Comments: This tree has a one -sided crown and is starting to dieback. In addition, it has a large wound on the trunk.
51 14" live oak 3.0 20'N, 18'S, 25'E, 09W
Comments: This tree has below average structure and form. The tree is rated 3.0 because it is systemically healthy and could evolve into a good
tree if preserved and maintained properly.
S2 20' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: Na
5( 3 11' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
54 17" red bay 2.0
Comments: This tree has poor form and structure and has several broken branches in the crown.
55 6" laurel oak 2.5
Comments: This tree is downgraded because it has very poor form.
56 4" cherry laurel 2.0
Comments: The top has been broken out of this tree and it needs to be removed.
57 7" cherry laurel 1.5.
Comments: The crown of this tree is bent over due to the overhead canopy of adjacent trees. The tree has poor form and structure.
58 8" cherry laurel 2.0
Comments: This tree has poor form and structure.
59 9" cherry laurel 2.0
Comments: This tree has poor form and structure and dieback in the crown.
60 12" cherry laurel 0.0
Comments: dead tree
61 4" cherry laurel 1.0
Comments: This tree has very poor overall form and structure.
62 11" cherry laurel 1.5
Comments: This tree has a codominant in the main fork and very poor form.
63 20 ", 10 ", 6" red bay 1.5
Comments: This tree was shown on the survey as a 13" tree but is actually 28" diameter at the base and 36" in diameter at 4.5' above grade. The
10" diameter leader has a large vertical crack and it will have to be removed. The remainder of the tree has very poor structure. Recommend
removal.
64 4" red bay 1.5
Comments: This tree has very poor form as it bends beneath the canopy of an adjacent tree.
65 12" chinaberry 1.0
Comments: This tree is a category #1 invasive exotic species and an overall noxious tree. Recommend removal.
66 5 ", 511, 6" red bay
1.5
Comments: This tree is tri- dominant at the base and has very poor overall. structure and form.
67 911,111, laurel oak 2.0
Comments: This tree has a severe codominant attachment with included bark 1' above grade. Recommend removal.
68 11' C.T. cabal palm 3.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
69 24' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 6' radius
Comments: This tree is very attractive but needs vines removed from trunk if it is preserved.
70 8" hickory
2.5
Comments: This tree has a one -sided crown growing to the southeast. It has a codominant stem with included bark 6' above grade in two scaffold
branches.
71 23' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm is exceptionally attractive and healthy. It is located on the slope of the bluff and could be preserved in place or transplanted
on site. Recommend preservation.
72 22' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm has a superb crown and should be preserved or transplanted on site.
73 11 ", 6" camphor
1.5
Comments: This tree has poor form, dieback, a codominant stem and is a category #1 invasive exotic species.
74 29" live oak 3.5 0'N, 50'S, 0'E, 42'W
Comments: This tree has a sound trunk and root flare. The overall structure is exceptional and live crown ratio is above average. The form is
slightly below average as it is essentially a one -sided tree.
75 7 -stems >10',i% Senegal date palm cluster 5.0 12' radius
Comments: The Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata) is extremely valuable as a landscape feature. This cluster has seven stems with over 10' of
clear trunk and several others of various sizes. The palm has not been pruned for an extremely long time and presently presents a shabby
appearance. However, once pruned it will be striking. It is located at the toe of the slope and could be preserved in place if it is not in conflict
with the site development. Otherwise the palm should be transplanted on site if feasible. Recommend consulting with a palm broker.
76 30' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This'palm has an attractive curve to the west. There is a branch from a nearby oak tree that is rubbing the crown. This branch should
be removed if the palm is preserved.
77 17" red bay
1,
Comments: This tree has a 12" diameter dead stem and the remainder of the tree is in decline. This tree is a hazard, recommend removal.
78 4 —stems >10' Senegal date palm cluster 4.5 12' radius
Comments: This palm cluster is located by the shoreline in an area where it should be able to be preserved. It will make a beautiful landscape
feature if pruned properly. Recommend preservation..
79 20" C.T. sabal palm
4.5 6' radius
Comments: This palm is located by the shoreline and is a beautiful palm. Recommend preservation.
80 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
81 32T .T. cabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm would be a specimen except for a few small wounds on the trunk. Recommend preservation.
82 12' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
83 ` 20' C.T. cabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm has an attractive trunk that curves to the east and then back to the west. Recommend preservation.
84 8" camphor 1.5
Comments: This tree is covered with vines and has poor form. It is also a category #1 invasive exotic. Recommend removal.
85 4" laurel oak 0.5
Comments: The crown of this tree was blown off in the storm. Recommend removal.
86 6" hickory 2.5
'Comments: This tree has suffered storm damage to the crown on the south side and the crown is saturated with vines. Recommend removal.
87 8" hickory 3.5 10'N, 5'S, 0'E; 15'W
Comments: This tree has a straight trunk with good overall structure. The live crown ratio is above average. The form is irregular which
downgrades the tree's value. If this tree is preserved and maintained properly it will evolve into a good tree. Recommend preservation.
88 10" hickory 0.5
Comments: The top of this tree has suffered irreparable damage. Recommend removal.
(`89) 30' C:T. sabal palm 5.5 6' radius
�C--o-- moments: A near specimen quality palm. It is picturesque. There are a few blemishes on the trunk that downgrade this palm. Recommend
preservation.
90 30' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm has an attractive curve in the trunk. This palm if preserved with #89 would make an attractive feature. If they are in the
way of new construction recommend transplanting on site.
91 20' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius
Comments: A beautiful palm, recommend preservation.
92 4" hickory 2.5
Comments: This tree has poor form and is covered with vines.
93 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: A good palm, recommend preservation.
94 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: A good palm, recommend preservation.
95 IF CT. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
96 6" cherry laurel 2.0
Comments: This tree has below average form and structure.
97 11" hickory 4.5 15'N, 15' S, 15'E, 15V
Comments: This tree has a sound trunk and root flare and good overall structure. The form is basically symmetrical and the live crown ratio is
very good. Recommend preservation.
98 20' C.T. queen palm 2.5
Comments: This palm has a beautiful crown but has a large decayed area on the north side of the trunk that is a significant down grade,
99 10' C.T. queen palm 2.5
Comments: This palm has wires wrapped around the trunk and an anemic trunk.
100 14" laurel oak 2.5
Comments: This tree has a codominant stem 7' above grade that has included bark. It has a bulge at the fork indicating interior wounding. This
tree also has a minor mistletoe infestation. Recommend removal.
101 16 ", 15 ", 15 ", 8" hickory 2.0
Comments: This tree is downgraded because of the severe codominant attachment at the base of the three large codominant stems. The 16"
diameter stem is severely included to one of the 15" diameter stems. The two 15" stems have connective tissue between the stems but there is
some decay in the crotch. There is also a girdling root that is causing a problem. The upper crown structure is very good and the live crown ratio
is superb. The form is also exceptionally good and the tree has high aesthetic value. However, the codominant situation in the base is a major
concern as this type of a situation can lead to dramatic failure. If the tree was braced with rods its condition would be upgraded however, this
procedure is relatively expensive. This tree may be in the public right of way, if so check with the City of Clear-water's Urban Forestry Division
(562 -4950) to inquire if they would be willing to perform cabling and bracing on this tree. Recommend removal if this tree is not secured by
cabling and bracing.
02 23" laurel oak 3.5 25'N, 22'S, 20'E, 14'W
Comments: This tree has good upper crown structure and above average live crown ratio. The tree has a cavity 8' above grade but the tree should
solve this wound. The overall form is good and this tree will evolve into a good tree if preserved. Recommend preservation.
103 21' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm is almost a specimen. Recommend preservation.
104 - 18' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm has a beautiful crown and an almost flawless trunk.
105 r 21' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
1.06 20' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
107 19' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
108 14' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: A good palm.
109 18" laurel oak 2.5
Comments: This tree has two large branches that are rubbing against each other causing a wound. The tree has a large trunk canker on the west
side. The main fork has poor structure. The upper crown structure has mostly epicormic growth likely from topping or storm damage a long time
ago. The live crown ratio is very good. Recommend removal.
110 15' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: A good palm.
11.1' 15' C.T. sabal palm
4.0 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
112 20' C.T. sabal palm
4.5 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
113 17' C.T. sabal palm
4.5 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
114 20' C.T. sabal palm
3.5 6' radius
Comments: A good palm.
115 16' C.T. sabal palm
4.5 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
116 20' C.T. cabal palm
5.0 6' radius
Comments: A superb palm.
117 20' C.T. cabal palm
5.0 6' radius
Comments: A superb palm.
118 19' C.T. sabal palm
4.5 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
119 20' C.T. sabal palm
4.5 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
120 24' C.T. sabal palm
4.5 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
121 13" laurel oak
2.5
Comments: This tree is growing next to a laurel oak tree, #122, and is codominant at the base with that tree. The two trees are fused together at
the root collar. The upper crown structure and live crown ratio are average.
122 10" laurel oak
2.0
Comments: This tree is attached at the base to tree #121 which downgrades the tree's overall condition. In addition, it has poor form and is
covered with vines.
123 12" camphor
1.5
Comments: This tree is diseased, has deadwood and is a category #1 invasive exotic species. Recommend removal.
124 18' C.T. sabal palm
3.5 6' radius
Comments: A good palm.
125 14' C.T. sabal palm
2.5
Comments: This palm is covered with' vines and
Brazilian pepper trees. If the vines and peppers trees are removed it will evolve into a good
palm.
126 5" laurel oak
3.0 79N9 7'S, 7'E, 5'W
Commentg: Thig tree has average Structure and form. The live crown ratio is above average. It is surrounded by pepper trees. If they are removed
the tree will evolve into a good tree.
Note: Tree's #127 & 128 appear just south of the property line of 312 N. Osceola Avenue and may have been inventoried in the previous tree
inventory for the property south of 312 N. Osceola. If this determination is made the trees will be removed from the survey to avoid incorrect
assessments in the tree mitigation process.
127 17' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
128 16" laurel oak 3.5 159N, 24'S, 12"E,18V
Comments: This tree has very good upper crown structure and a high live crown ratio. The crown is somewhat one -sided to the south but is
attractive. The tree has a palm growing into its base that has caused a slight indentation but it is not at all debilitating.
Q29 25" live oak 3.5 40'N, 37'S, 25'E, 30'W
Comments: This tree was not located on the original tree survey but was field located and the location has been identified on that survey. It will
appear on the revised tree survey. This tree has average live crown ratio and good overall structure. It has a vase shaped crown and needs pruning
to remove minor deadwood and heavy moss accumulations. Recommend preservation.
L �i
7-0
mx
13
ci)
<,- 01�15
G) mm
PIX 2!
-- ----- U Ow - -----
iJi . . .... ... ..... .... . . .....
CD e,
x
----- -----
-
-----------------
44
AW
....... .... .
.. .. ... ...
A174 1-' .... . ....... . . .. . ... ...
EP 13 2006
00 Po MD E SN
NE A?' IR CE S.
L-E A R
OSCEOLA &
BOUNDARY SURVEY ADOR400
410 S EETE
EARWATER, FLORIDA.
SCALE:
E.' " =
1 3Q'
N.BT4923-E. 41.J1'(M)
N07E ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN N 89'4108'E 41.77'(L)
70 IEY
10'.
PARENTHESIS AND BASES ON 1986 NAVD. .
29.J') f
8 0. d6 M) %1 491
M r FCM JXJ
pyE1dUE � Era t /z• s
nS 20• QV5
_
40' 4g0) F)P 3
Poe
5;1 /�,� � , Q -ASH TREE
Pf,YV 0.8'
(6.-
rIZX�N) RP 3' ' ^ -PALM TREE
S00'4400�Y � � w
.4 1 , 1 -PINE TREE
�U' 41
l 151 TROPICAL TREE
FlP ro 0 RP S69 ) (M) 04K TREE
QtR44' 14
� 1O EASf 79.25 (L P
, -[4CARINLI4 TREE
3
A PORTION a
jl
BLOC 2
(NOT INCLUDED) K oNi o o
Q
W �) H89'48'40 96.68(72) $ l �v
9 7.00 (C) 2 +'t
NAIL
�i RR I g O H
I FO 6 g 2 ui
.
� 2
k65 $ CURVE TABLE
y
o ' ,� 5
cL w g �, .00'0'
DELTA
,et•0� n
^ A
� � �• 20'ARC
j` 10 S 2 r
P LO �( 2 _ g 15.96'
N$ %6.4* �y0v �0�10.t0 131 �jl TANGENT '
Lo
✓1
o f0 0'0
12• �4 15.60' M
((
15.88, L)
o O
^ CHORD BEARING
EA►
i Z ro' 10' fV S.49'42'46'W. M)
C S 5.49'42.461Y.(cs
501 n 0.8• to 5P 3�
1 p
`458
2 0.6 PoB
2'' FlR 1/2• FCM JXJ
��r
589'4928 -1: 96.83'(72) 5.89'4904 -W.. 150.76'(72) S.89'48.191Y. 5193'(M)
97C0'(C) S89'4I 06W I .56(C)) S89- 4I06W. 53.95'(L)
(OVER AU)
`'W�
�5•fl� JONES STREET 1 19-
00' RA
PARCEL f1
1H£ WEST 2/J OF LOT Z BLOCK Z JONES SUBDIVISION OF FRCNOLSONS ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1. PAGE 14 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HALSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLOROK OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A
PART OF LESS THE NORTHWEST CORNER AND BONG MORE PAR71CULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS
BECOR04G AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT Z BLOCK Z OF SAID JONES SUBDAISfON FOR A POINT OF BMNNING: THENCE N.00'231OOW. ALONG
THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT Z 169.80 FEET,- THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE; ( SAID CARVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET,- A UNCENT OF
8.07 FEET,• A CHORD OF 1555 FEET; A CHORD BEARING MAT42461E). A DISTANCE OF 15.96 FEET. THENCE N89-411081E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF-
SAID LOT Z 41.77 FEET. THENCE SOO.2J001E. 180.00 FEET,• THENCE SB9'4106W. 53.95 FEET M THE POINT OF BEGINNING
PARCEL12
THE SOUTH 76 FEET OF LOT 1. BLOC( 2. JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSONS ADDTION To CLEARWATER HARBOR. ACCORDING TO THE PUT M£REOF
RECORDED IN PUT BOOK 1. PAGE tJ OF WE PUBLIC RECORDS OF Nt<LSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINELAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A
PMT. T)GEmm wm 7wr CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THE NEST LINE OF THE ABOVE DE SCRIBED LAND AND THE EAST RICHT- OF-WAY
UNE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE: LYING AND 88100 IN PINELLAS COUNTY, 110004,
PARCEL /3
BEGINNING AT ME SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK Z OF THE JONES SUBOMSM OF AjChVL50NS
ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR ACCORDING IV THE CORRECTED MAP OR FLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PUT BOOK I. PAGE r3, OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS. OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLOR104 Of' WHX H PI NELIAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART- RUN THENCE NOO'2J O0W, KONG THE EAST LINE
OF SAID LOT 1, 157 FEET FOR A POINT OF OMMMING.• THENCE S7924'06W.. 80.28 FEET- THENCE S00'44WW.. IZ21 FEE-T. THENCE EAST, PARALLEL
7F THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT, 79.25 FEET, WORE OR LESS. TO THE EAST UNE OF SAO LOT- THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT, 27
FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
N O TE: This survey was conducted without the benefit of an abstract of title, therefore there may be other easements, right- of-way,
setbock hoes agreements reservations, restrictions, or other similar matters o/ pubric record, not depicted on this survey.
A - AVIC Cf®= CNa/a0 BF.IRUAG DE - ORADIACE EASEMENT IN = FIRE NYpWR fAll = FIAIOfDCE PP - ftlMER POLE
O UII - flElA7H Illre( CH = CHORD EDP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT FRS = FOUND WON PIPE (MP -MANHOLE FUME, LIME SIP � PMf
BAG - 6EAAPIG CLF =CHITIN LNC FEN1'E EDW = EDOIC OF INTER FIR - FOUND IRON ROD P - PUT
C - CURVE CONC. - CDYAORE'lE FCC - FOUND CROSS CUT IN - FOUND NN. PC - POAVr OF CURVA11M W - STOW OW WW OW 14M
CILC - C4tCWATED CS W - CCNKJW'TE SlODY1LK fDY =FOUND fPP - fDI/RID I'RUCYI PWE PCP - PF7AINEMf MY/RlI. PCM TIC = URUn' fA58MdT
CB - Glpl BtSHI D =DEED M - MFASIA E1eNr R - AW OF 94ERSECTON a NOW FENCE
FLOOD INFORMA DON:
LEGAL: I SEC710M 9 TOWNSHIP - 29 RANGE: 15
1 CER77FIED TO:
ZONE.. X
PROPEIMM LLC.
COLONIAL BANK
NUMBER: 125096 -01060
SEE ABOVE
105GLULA-JaVES
CHIG400 TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Q47E 09 -03 -03
CHKACO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
FLORIDA BENCHMARK, INC.
CERTIFICATION:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS WAS MADE UNDER
D
CHARGE MSEIY
MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND EIfE75 THE MINIMUM
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR
TEC MIC-4L SrAN61RAS AS SET FORM BY ME BOARD OF
D
PROFESSOWAL LAND SURVEYORS M CFNPIER 61G17 -6 OF
1298 LAKEVIEW ROAD PH. (727) 298 -0286
THE FLORM ADMNISTRATVE COOL; PURSUANT TO SECIro10
472427 OF THE RORM STATUTES, NOT VAUD WTINOUT
CLEARWA7ER. FL. JJ756 FAXjf (727) 461 -0696
SCNATURE AND EMBOSSED WIN SURVEYOR SEAL
AUTHORIZATION NO- L8 6947
FIELD WORK BY:
'Lr�
MO F
1111E 05 -20-04
RENSIOw DATE
1 --
Z:
1,3.
PACE f
DRAWN BY:
WD8
DATE 05 -20-04
JOB# 04-1579
M. G. MAYIR PLS 4495 DATE
C� r
•
S�IJ1L "`% CITY OF CLEARWATER - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
9goQ TREE REMOVAL PERMIT
NAME OF OWNER 1 i, I Ck ne. Y'I o �5 -non
SITE ADDRESS °-1 ► o 't-J,
PHONE i - 44�0--cw,u
OWNER'S ADDRESS USA
LOCATION OF TREE(S) ON LOT
SPECIES AND NUMBER OF TREE(S) 'See-
TO APPLICANT: A non - refundable fee of $15.00 for up to five trees to
be removed, plus $3.00 for every tree above 5 to be
removed is required.
REASON FOR REMOVAL:
*Construction
•See "A" below
O Hazardous
0 Declining
0 Dead
a Other (Specify)
Fee Rec'd. $
A) CONSTRUCTION Date
1, For new construction, ddditionS or other modifica'tions'of a property which involve the removal of a protected tree(s),
a site plan is required. This site plan must have a minimum scale of 1 " =20' for single family lots, or 1 " =50' for all others. The
site plan must include:
a. Major Changes of Grade f. Proposed Number of Parking Spaces j. All Protected Trees Including:
b. Structure Locations g. Proposed Underground Utilities (i.) Diameter of 4.5' above grade (DBH)
c, Driveways and Walks h. Zoning Setbacks (ii.) Surveyed Location
d. Parking Arrangement i. All easements and Rights- of -Wdy . (iii.) Species
e. Required Number of Parking Spaces (iv.) Diseased. or Insect Infested Trees
k: Tree Barricade Detail & Locations
2. Protective barriers are required around all trees remaining on site during construction. These barricades must remain
intact during construction. The barriers must meet City Specifications.
B) REPLACEMENTS
1. Tree replacement minimum standards: 10' overall height 2.5" caliper, Florida Grade #1. See Inspectors note below to
determine the number of replacement trees required. Replacements required within 30 days.
I hereby certify that as property owner or as representative of the property owner, I have verified that the tree(s) sought
to be removed is wholly on property owned by the above - identified property owner, and should it be determined that
the tree(s) are located wholly or partially on properly owned by some other person, then, I agree to hold the City of
Clearwater harmless in any claim made for wrongful removal of such tree(s). I hereby certify that this application together
with any plans swbA4W,,ed is a true representation of all facts concerning the proposed removal of the tree(s). Any deviation
from th it issue shall render it null and void and be considered a violation of the Community Development Code.
Signature of owner or applicant Printed Name
_30S >J - 1�`:-�- a N(L-9--, so
Address Agency Representing OCL #
3,Y1 6 S -7 a - �i to _ ou a0 > '� a�— a -1 sus
City State Zip Phone /Cell Friy
Required Replacement Trees:
Applicable Code Section:'
Based on the Inspector's comments and information submitted, the above removal application is:
0 Approved as Submitted °Approved- Modified as Noted Above 0 Denied
Signed:`` Date: Oths
Community evelopm t Coordinator or Designee /Inspector Valid for six from the date of issuance.
1362.0001 -GC White - Planning & Development Services Yellow - Applicant Rev. 2-03
BOEN'S TREE SERVICE
P.O. Box 86
Ozona, Fl., 34660 -0086
Tree inventory for Harrison Village and Island View
1/20M.
Site overview and tree canopy analysis: The subject property consists of two parcels.
The first parcel is located west of North Osceola Avenue and is a natural bluff that slopes
to the shoreline of Clearwater Harbor_ The property consists of two single family home
lots with old houses perched atop the bluff. The property contains relatively few of the
older native shade trees typical of the bluff environment. Man ringing the
bluff in Clearwater still retain mature specimen quality trees .that pre-existed development
on the bluff. Native tree species that are common to the bluff include live oak (Que1 cus
virginiana), Southern red cedar (Juniperus silicicola) and pignut hickory (Carya glabra)
on the uplands and sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana) which grows on the slopes where
seepage creates a moist environment. Additionally, the native sabal palm ( Sabal
palmetto) grows throughout the bluff. There were no trees inventoried that approached
specimen quality and only one tree, a 38" diameter live oak tree (rated in the inventory)
warrants consideration to alter the site design to preserve. Existing trees have suffered
from improper tree care and general neglect. Essentially all native understory vegetation
has been removed and exotic invasive species such as the Brazilian pepper (Schinus
terebinthifolius) tree and air potato vine (Dioscorea bulbifera) have colonized on the
property_
The second parcel inventoried is a mixed commercial/residential tract located between
North Fort Harrison Avenue and North Osceola Avenue and between Jones Street and
Georgia Street. This parcel has retained only a few of the mature live oak or hickory trees
such as those that are commonly observed flanking the Ft. Harrison corridor in
Clearwater. The parcel is for the most part characterized by younger second growth trees
or trees that have been planted for landscape purposes. The one commonality of the trees
growing on this parcel is that they have been poorly maintained. Many shade tree species
have experienced flush and stub cuts or have been repeatedly topped to the extent that
their structure is ruined. In addition, many trees have suffered from insufficient irrigation
and in some cases nutritional deficiencies. The native understory vegetation has been
removed and replaced by sod or common hedge plant species.
In summary, neither of the parcels supports trees or native vegetation of a quality that
enhances the uniqueness and beauty of the bluff environment while providing a
vegetative link to Clearwater's past. Consequently, the impact of development to either
site's urban forestry resources will be minimal. ;
REMOVE 130 TREES) (FLLD2006- 05030)
A R nei VI L) nn�n i n in n Dnr \ •;fu LAUL, 114 7- 77P
T 1
Tree Inventory Data
The tree inventory provides a "snapshot" of the property and establishes a hierarchy of
existing trees to assist the site designer in the process of choosing trees to be incorporated
into the site design. The inventory includes the following information:
1. Tree location — Each tree is listed by a number that corresponds to the
same number physically located on the site plan indicating the location of
the tree in the field.
2. Tree size is expressed as diameter at breast height (DBH — the trunk
diameter measured at 4.5'above grade). If there is a. fork at 4.S, the
measurement is taken at the narrowest point below the fork.
3. Tree species are shown by both common and botanical names the first
time listed in the inventory and only by common name thereafter.
4. The trees overall value rating ranks the tree on a scale of 0 -6 (half
increments are used to increase accuracy) based on the trees overall health
(condition). Factors such as the size, species and appearance are also
considered. An explanation of the overall value rating system is provided
below.
5. The crown spread for larger shade trees is shown as distance and
direction from the tntnk (the crown spread is only shown within the
property lines).
6. The comment section provides commentary discussing specific points
both positive and negative of the subject tree.
NOTE: The Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius) and the punk tree (Melaleuca
quinquenervia) are invasive exotic trees that are recognized as category one ecological
pests by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council and consequently have been so
designated with an IE (invasive exotic) on the inventory and assigned a zero value in the
inventory. There are other trees such as the camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora) that
have also been recognized as ecological pests but have not been recognized as such in the
inventory as their degree of invasiveness is not as severe in the bluff environment in
Clearwater.
11
Rating System
0 — A dead tree.
1 — Trees that are dying, severely declining, or hazardous and trees designated by the
State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1 ecological pest, i.e.,
Brazilian pepper tree. A tree with a #1 rating should be removed.
2 — Trees exhibiting serious structural defects (i.e., codominant stems with included
bark), large cavities, crown dieback, low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease
or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or pH related problems. A tree with a #2
rating should be removed unless the problems will be mitigated.
3 — Trees that have good overall structure, crown density and systemic health with
problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a #3 rating
should be preserved if possible.
4 — Trees with good structure and systemic health with problems that can easily be
corrected with minor maintenance. Trees should exhibit good form with above
average crown density. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or
other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if
they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. Trees with
a #4 rating should be preserved and warrant site plan modification for preservation.
S- Trees with high live crown ratio, exceptional structure, systemic health, good form
and free from any serious disease, insect problem or nutritional deficiency. A tree in
this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic qualities. Trees
with a #5 rating lend considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into
the site design.
6- Specimen tree — A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior
qualities relating to size, specie, form, uniqueness, structure, systemic health and
crown density. A specimen tree must be preserved and incorporated into a site design
with an undisturbed area equal to the tree's dripline.
r e
Tree Inventory
Treed Size Species
1 - 25" Laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia)
Rating Crown spread
2.5 24' -N, 14' -S, 2l' -E, 15' -W
Comments: This tree has overall poor structure and an asymmetrical root flare due to the
presence of asphalt and a curb. The tree has experienced flush cuts that will cause cavities
to develop in the trunk and has old stub cuts present that will also promote decay.
Recommend removal.
Podocarpus (Podocarpus macrophyllus) 2.0 NSA
Comments: This tree has stubs left on the tree and has poor overall structure.
3 - 20" Laurel oak 2.5 12' -N, 18' -S, 24' -E, 20' -W
Comments: This tree has a potentially hazardous codominant stem in the trunk 10' above
grade. The tree will experience structurally weakness due to previous flush cuts and small
cavities on the main leaders. It also has a thinning canopy with minor dieback occurring
in the upper crown. Recommend removal.
4- 3" Citrus (Citrus spp.) 2.0 N/A
Comments: Not protected under the City's tree ordinance due to size. This tree is poor
specimen - recommend removal.
5 - 12" Camphor (Cinnamomum camphora) 2.0 12' -N, 5' -S, 18' -E, 0' -W
Comments: IE, This tree is one -sided with the canopy growing to the east. It has an
under- developed crown. Recommend removal.
6 - 13" Podocarpus 2.0 N/A
Comments: Poor form, recommend removal.
7 - 25" Laurel oak 2.5 15' -N, 20' -S, 16' -E, 18' -W
Comments: This tree has a sparse crown and low energy. The upper crown has a large
percentage of dieback, recommend removal.
8 - 20" Laurel oak 2.5 18' -N, 15' -S, 20' -E, 20' -W
Comments: This tree has overall poor structure with a thinning crown and dieback in the
canopy. The tree has suffered from stub cuts and flush cuts and decay will increase in the
future. Recommend removal.
9 - 10" Podocarpus 1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is located on the property line and has poor structure and is covered
with vines. Recommend removal.
10 - 16" Laurel oak 1.5 18' -N, 20' -E, 5' -W
Comments: This tree has large deadwood and vines in the canopy. Very poor tree overall,
recommend removal.
11 - 23" Laurel oak 2.0 25' -N, 20' -E, 20' -W
Comments: This tree is located on the property line and has an asymmetrical base due to
the presence of a concrete slab on the north side. The tree also has a thinning canopy,
mistletoe, trunk cankers, crossing branches, surface roots and a large rebar imbedded in
the trunk_ Recommend removal.
12 - 10" Laurel oak 1.5 5' =N, 0' -E, 20' -W
Comments: This tree is located on the property line and has very poor overall structure. It
is covered with vines and has a one -sided crown. Recommend removal.
13 - 18" Laurel oak 2.5 14' -N, 22' -E, 15' -W
Comments: This tree is located on the property line and has poor structure with the root
flare located 6" from a 3'high retaining wall. "The tree will cause problems in the future
due to its location.
14 - 8" Podocarpus 2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has, poor form. Recommend removal.
15 - 10" Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal.
16 - 10" Sabal palm ( Sabal palmetto) 2.0 N/A
Comments: Tree has 6' of clear trunk (C.T.) and is not protected by the City of
Clearwater's Tree Protection Ordinance which protects palms with a clear trunk of 10' or
greater. This tree is growing under the canopy of an adjacent 38" diameter live oak tree.
Recommend removal.
17 - 38" Live oak (Quercus virginiana) 4.0 28 " -N, 22' -S, 20' -E, 29' -W
Comments: This tree has above average structure with minor basal decay on the
Southwest Side and an old wound that is closing on the west side. The tree has a healthy
systemic system and average crown density. The tree is pushing over a 4' high retaining
wall. This is a good tree and warrants consideration for preservation. If the tree is
incorporated into the site design, the original grades will have to be maintained through
new retaining walls.
18 - 2 -10" Jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia) 2.0 18' -N, 25' -E, 12' -W
Comments: This tree is on the property line and has a codominant stem low in the trunk.
This species is weak wooded and susceptible to periodic freeze damage. It could be
preserved for aesthetic amenities (only blue flowering tree).
19 — 14" Camphor 1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is on the property line and has been severely topped. The structure
is permanently ruined. Recommend removal.
20 — Row of Pittosporum ( Pittosporum tobira) 3.5 N/A
Comments: A row of mature pittosporum is located near the south property line and
provides screening from the adjacent property. If pruned they will provide both a
functional and aesthetic amenity.
21 — Brazilian pepper cluster 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal.
22 - Brazilian pepper cluster 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal
23 - Senegal date palm cluster (Phoenix reclinata) 2.5 N/A
Comments: Multi -stem cluster with 8 -9' of clear trunk. The palms have been neglected
and need pruning. An adjacent oak tree is interfering with the crown development. Could
prune oak to accommodate the palm cluster or move on site. If palm cluster will not be
utilized contact a palm broker who may be willing to purchase.
24 - 19" Live oak
3.0 20' -N, 20' -S, 15'- E,18' -W
Comments: This tree is systemically healthy and has average structure and canopy. The
tree is covered with vines and could be a good tree with pruning and vine removal.
T
25 - Senegal date palm cluster 3.5 N/A
Comments: There is minor damage from bird pecking on one trunk but could be an asset
if cleaned up,
26 - 29" Laurel oak 2.0 18' -N, 26' -S, 23' -E, 18' -W
Comments: This tree has minor basal decay, a thinning canopy and large deadwood. It
also has poor structure and a heavy vine infestation. Recommend removal.
27 - 9 ",17" Live oak 1.5 N/A
Continents: Severe dieback and decline. Recommend removal.
28 - 18" Southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora) 1.5 15' -N, 15' -S, 10' -E, 14' -W
This tree has a severely thinning canopy with a high percentage of dead wood. It is also
covered with vines. Recommend removal.
29 - 6" Laurel oak 1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has severe dieback and virtually no crown. Recommend removal.
30 - 6" Laurel oak 1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is severely declining and should be removed.
31 - 40" Laurel oak 1.5 16' -N, 24' -S, 20' -E, 14' -W
Comments: This tree has extremely poor structure and heavy dieback on the west side.
Recommend removal.
32 - 6" Citrus 2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has severe crown dieback. Recommend removal.
33 - 10" Saba] palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has a heavy vine infestation but will be a good palm once vines are
removed.
34- 10" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A
Comments: This tree has heavy vine infestation but will be a good palm once vines are
removed.
35 - 20" Camphor 2.0 15' -N, 20' -S, 14' -E, 10' -W
Comments: This tree has a codominant stem at the base and has dieback and branch
stubs. It is also infested with vines. Recommend removal.
36 - 23" Mango (Mangifera indica) 2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has a codominant stem 3' above grade, damage from. past freezes, a
cavity in one leader and steel imbedded in the trunk. Recommend removal.
37 - 14" Hickory (Carya glabra) 2.5 20' -N, 0' -S, 12' -E, 10' -W
Comments: This tree has a misshaped One -sided Crown. It is systemically healthy and is
growing 1' from a retaining wall. Could be preserved if pruned and retaining wall is
removed and present grade maintained.
38 - 35" Live oak 3.5 26' -N, 15' -S, 25' -E, 14' -W
Comments: This tree is overall systemically healthy but has minimal dieback. It has
above average structure and needs to have vines removed. It is located 6" from a concrete
retaining wall. This tree is worthy of preservation but the retaining wall will have to be
removed and the present grade maintained.
39 - 7" Cherry laurel (Prunus caroliniana) 2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has very poor form and is growing beneath the canopy of tree # 38.
Recommend removal.
40 - 7" Holly (17ex attenuata `East Palatka') 3.5 12' -N, 12' -S, 12' -E, 12' -W
Comments: This tree has an attractive form and is in good condition but prone to
infestation from Sphaeropsis Knot disease.
41 - Podocarpus 0 N/A
Comments: Dead tree, remove.
42 - 26" Laurel oak • 3.0 26' -N, 24' -S, 14' -E, 22' -W
Comment: This tree has a codominant trunk 15' above grade that could be strengthened
with cabling and bracing. The tree needs.pruning to improve structure and is growing 1'
foot from house and 4' from retaining wall. Recommend preservation if maintained.
43 - Sabal palm 0 N/A
7 6
Comments: No clear trunk — remove.
44 - 6" Podocarpus 2.5 N/A
Comments: Below average form, recommend removal.
45 - 10" Sabal palm 2.0 N/A
Comments: This palm has 4' of clear trunk and is not a protected tree by City ordinance.
Recommend removal.
46 - 30" Live oak 3.0 28' -N, 22' -S, 26' -E, 21' -W
Comments: This tree has a thinning crown with 15% dieback and is covered with vines. It
could be preserved but will require substantial pruning.
47 — 38" Ficus ( Ficus spp.) N/A N/A
Comments: This tree is located on the adjacent property to the north. It is a poor
specimen but its root system should be protected during construction to prevent further
decline.
48 - 12" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A
Comments: Good palm with gentle curve in trunk. Recommend removing vines and
preserve palm or transplant on site.
49 - 12" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A
Comments: Tall palm with healthy crown. Recommend preserving.
50 - 10' Sabal palm 4.5 N/A
Comments: Located just north of property line. Protect during construction.
51 - 10" Sabal palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: Located off property line, protect during construction.
52 - 10" Sabal palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: Good palm, remove vines and preserve if possible.
53 - 12" Laurel oak 10 8' -N, 18' -S, 12' -E, 16' -W
J ,
Comments: This tree has a one -sided crown but has good structure and systemic health.
Remove vines if tree will be preserved.
54 - 10" Saba] palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: Located on property line, good palm, preserve if possible.
55 —12 stem Senegal date palm 3.5 N/A
Comments: This palm cluster has been neglected and needs heavy maintenance to restore
appearance. However, it could be a very valuable addition to the site landscaping.
56- 15" Brazilian pepper cluster 0 N/A
Comments: M, Recommend removal.
57 —12" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A
Comments: Good palm, worthy of preservation.
58 —12" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A
Comments: Good palm, worthy of preservation.
59 — Brazilian pepper cluster 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal.
60 — 6" Hickory 3.0 10' -S
Comments: Located on adjacent property, protect during construction.
61 — 40" Punk tree (Melaleuca quinquenervia) 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal.
62 - 37" Punk tree 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal.
63 - 4" Hickory 3.0 N/A
Comments: Tree is located on the property line at the northeast corner of the property and
is growing beneath the canopy of an adjacent oak tree.
64 - 14" Live oak 3 .0 18' -N, 16' -S, 10' -E, 16' -W
Comments: This tree has a one -sided crown and several large stubs. It is located 1' from
a building foundation. It has good structure but will probably have to be removed due to
proposed demolition.
65 - Senegal date palm cluster
N/A I N/A
Comments: Palm stems have 1' of clear trunk and are not protected by City ordinance.
The cluster could be moved and allowed to grow.
66 —11" Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta) 3.0 N/A
Comments: Palm is located on the street right of way and belongs to the City of
Clearwater. All trees growing in City rights of way should be protected during
construction. If a tree needs maintenance or removal contact the City's Urban
forestry Division @ 562 -4950 x7220.
67 - 1 I" Washington palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: Palm is located on street right of way.
68 - 12" Washington palm 3.0 N/A
Comments: Tree is located on street right of way.
69 -10" Norfolk Island pine (Araucaria heterophylla) 3.5 N/A
Comments: Attractive tree with good form and overall health. This tree is susceptible to
freeze damage and should only be preserved if it is desired in the proposed Iandscape
theme.
70 - 3" Live oak
2.5
N/A
Comments: Tree is not protected under City -code due to size. It has an underdeveloped
crown and is growing beneath trees # 69 &71. Recommend removal.
71 — 10" Live oak
3.0 15' -N, 12' -S, 13' -E, 12' -W
Comments: This tree has poor structure but good systemic health. It has a codominant
stem that can be mitigated through subordinate pruning.
72 — 28" Live oak
3.5 33' -N, 36' -S, 31' -E, 12' -W
Comments: This tree is located on the City right of way and has a codominant stem on
the southwest side with included bark. Tree is pushing out curb and has a girdling root,
a r,
deadwood, and dead palm stump next to the trunk —all should be removed. Call City to
perform required maintenance.
-)V-
73 - 40" Live oak
4.0 25' -N, 39' -S, 27' -E, 30' -W
Comments: This tree has good structure and average systemic health. The crown is not
developed on the north side due to competition from tree #74. Good tree — preserve if
possible.
74 - 50" Live oak 3.5 36' -N, 24' -S, 37' -E, 28' -W
Comments: This tree is located on the City right of way and has a codommant 3.5' above
grade but it has a wide crotch with the branch bark ridge present. The west side of the
tree has minor damage at the root flare and basal decay that is not debilitating. The
systemic system is healthy. The tree's root system has broken the curb which could be
repaired by City crews. The crown is open and aesthetically appealing. This tree
compliments tree # 73, protect during construction.
75 - 6" Slash pine (Pinus elliottii) 3.0 7' radius all directions
Comments: This tree is systemically healthy but has a sparse crown. Could be preserved
and appearance will improve with proper care.
76 - 6" Slash pine
Comments: See comments for tree # 75 above.
3.0 7' radius. in all directions
77 - 13" Crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) 5.0
N/A
Comments: This is a beautiful tree with a full well developed crown. It has no diseases or
insect problems and would lend aesthetic qualities to this site. Recommend preservation.
78 - 10" Washington palm
3.0
N/A
Comments: This palm is located on the right of way and has an interesting crook in the
trunk. Protect during construction.
79 - 6" Live oak
2.0
N/A
Comments: This tree is located in a buffer strip and has been topped (lollipop). It is also
growing under a rack of utility wires. Recommend replacing with an accent tree.
80 - 6" Live oak 2.0 N/A
Comments: See comments for tree # 79.
n
a q
81 - 8" Crape myrtle
3.5
N/A
Comments — This tree is growing in an interior landscape island. It has an attractive
crown and is healthy. Minor decay is present from improper pruning at base. This tree
will develop into a good tree if cared for properly.
82 — 8" Crape myrtle 3.5 N/A
Comments: See comments for tree # 81.
83 - 15" Laurel oak 2.5 20' -N, 15' -S, 15' -E, 2' -W
Comments: This tree has a good systemic health but has a one sided crown due to
competition from adjacent tree. It is growing 6" from building wall. Recommend
removal.
84 - 14" Laurel oak 2.5 19' -N, 18' -S, 2' -E, 9' -W
Comments: This tree is located 1.5' from building and will develop basal decay from
injury. Recommend removal.
85 - 17" Laurel oak 2.5 15' -N, 16' -S, 10' -E, 16' -W
Comments: This tree has good structure and systemic health but two 7" long flush cuts on
leader will cause serious decay. If preserved it will have to be periodically monitored.
86 - 42" Live oak 4.5 . 27' -W, 40' -S, 48' -E, 42' -W
Comments: This tree has a large spreading crown with good systemic health except for a
thinning upper center crown. It has minor dieback and deadwood. If tree is properly
pruned it would be worthy of shifting structures to incorporate into site plan design.
Recommend preservation.
87 - 23" Camphor 2.0 10' -N, 21' -S, 15' -E, 16' -W
Comments: This tree has two fissures in trunk from crotch to the base that will
compromise the structural integrity of the tree. It also has poor form. Recommend
removal.
88 - 25" Live oak 3.0 39' -N, 27' -S, 28' -E, 24' -W
Comments: This tree has an irregular form and is suffering from previous poor pruning. It
could develop into a better tree with proper maintenance.
89 - 22" Live oak 3.0 0' -N, 36' -S, 24' -E, 24' -W
rr a
Comments: This tree has a pronounced lean to the south due to competition from tree
#90. The trunk has a corkscrew effect and tree has a large stub and heavy moss. This tree
needs proper pruning. It could be preserved as a stand with trees #88, 89 & 90.
90 - 24" Live oak 3.0 7' -N, 21' -S, 15' -E, 24' -W
Comments: This tree has a narrow crown due t0 c0lllpet1t on from adjacent trees. It has a
large stub that needs removal and heavy moss.
91- 15" Hickory 3.5 5' -N, 23' -S, 16' -E, 24' -W
Comments: This tree has a lean to the south due to competition from tree #92. It has good
crown density and systemic health. It has surface roots and is growing 3' from adjacent
hickory. Preserve if possible.
92 - 15" Hickory 35 22' -N, 7' -S, 12' -E, 22' -W
This tree has an arrow straight trunk with good structure and crown density_ Preserve
along with adjacent hickory, tree# 91, if possible.
93 - 5" Hickory 2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is growing beneath the canopy of tree # 92. It has poor structure.
Recommend removal.
94 - 14" Hickory 3.5 18' -N, 12' -S, 24' -E, 10' -W
Comments: One sided crown to east due to competition. Good structure and systemic
health. Utility wires are growing through canopy. Good tree to preserve, especially if
wires will be relocated.
95 - 13" Laurel oak 2.0 12' -N, 15' -S, 8' -E, 16' -W
Comments: This tree has poor form and minor damage to root flare on the southwest side.
It has a large cavity in crotch with sporophores present. It is growing 1' from parking lot
edge. Recommend removal.
96 - 30" Live oak 4.5 15'-N,,36'-S, 16' -E, 27' -W
Comments: This tree has good structure and crown density and an exceptional systemic
system. It is growing into the edge of the parking lot. This tree should be preserved but
will need the pavement to be saw -cut to accommodate the expanding root flare.
97 — 9" Crape myrtle 3.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has a symmetrical crown and good systemic health but is growing
under tree #96. It could be preserved with minor pruning on the oak to accommodate the
crown.
98 - 9" Crape myrtle 3.5 N/A
Comments: A good tree with symmetrical crown and above average systemic health-
-99 - 8" Crape myrtle 2.5 N/A
Comments: This tree has a below average crown and systemic health but would improve
with a program of watering and fertilization.
100 — 6" Multi- stemmed Wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) 2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has considerable dieback and decay in the trunks. Recommend
removal.
101 — 9" Crape myrtle 3.0 N/A
Comments: Tree is in overall good shape but has minor decay at base where stems were
removed.
102 — 10" Crape myrtle 4.0 N/A
Comments: A multi- stemmed tree with a full healthy crown. Recommend preservation.
103 —10" Sabal palm— 8' Clear trunk (C.T.) 3.0 N/A
Comments: This palm is growing in a raised planter along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue.
Planter is too small for this tree. Recommend removal.
104 — 8" Queen Palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana) 2.0 N/A
Comments: This palm is in the same planter as tree # 103. Recommend removal.
105 — 13" Sabal palm 9'C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: In planter, good tree — could preserve or transplant on site.
106 — 13" Sabal palm 9' C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: See comments for tree # 105.
107 — 12" Sabal palm 8' C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: This palm is a healthy specimen with a good appearance. It is located in a
landscape buffer located between a parking lot and N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. It is growing
with trees # 105, 106 & 108. Recommend preserving all of these palms.
108 —14" Sabal palm 6' C.T. 3.0 N/A
Comments: See remarks for tree # 107.
109 —11" Sabal palm 10' C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: This is a healthy palm that is located in a landscape buffer along N. Ft.
Harrison Avenue. It is located in a row with trees # 110, 111, & 112. The buffer is
conducive to a palm landscape. Recommend preservation.
110 —13" Sabal palm 9' C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: See comments for tree # 109.
111 — 11" Sabal palm / 2.5 N/A
Comments: This palm has a small crown and has pits on the trunk. Recommend replacing
with a new sabal palm to blend in with trees # 109 & 110 if they are preserved.
112 —11" Live oak 2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has poor structure with two codominant stems at the main fork
located 6' above the grade. It is in a planter too small to accommodate its future growth.
Recommend removal.
113 —12" Sabal palm 9' C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: This palm along with trees # 114 & 115 are all growing in a planter between
a parking lot and N. Ft. Harrison Avenue and are in very good condition. As the buffer is
sure to remain they can be used to meet buffer landscape requirements. Recommend
preservation of all three. .
11.4 — 12" Sabal palm 10' C.T.
Comments: See comments for tree # 113.
115 — 13" Sabal palm 8' C.T.
Comments: See comments for tree # 113.
4.0 N/A
3.5 N/A
Note: Recommend a landscape of sabal palms along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue tying trees #
103, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 113, 114 & 115 together and fill in the gaps with new
sabal palms.
116 — Brazilian pepper 0 N/A
Comments: IE, Recommend removal.
117 — 5" Live oak 1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has been repeatedly topped. Recommend removal.
118 — 5" Live oak
1.0
N/A
Comments: This tree has been repeatedly topped. Recommend removal.
119 — 6" Live oak
1.0
N/A
Comments: This tree has been repeatedly topped. Recommend removal.
120 — 12" Sabal palm 8' C.T.
3.0
N/A
Comments: This is a good palm but is growing against the building and cannot be
transplanted. Recommend removal.
121— 5" Hickory 3.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is growing in a parking lot island and has been topped — but with
Proper pruning will regain good structure. Recommend preservation.
122 — 35" Laurel oak 2.5 27' -N, 25' -S, 35' -E, 30' -W
Comments: This tree has a dense crown and a healthy systemic system but is loaded with
stub cuts. It also has cavities in two of the leaders and one leader has been stubbed. It has
poor stricture with 6 codominant leaders emanating from the main crotch, with a canker
beneath. Recommend removal.
'3 — 8" Multi- stemmed (6) Crape myrtle 2.5 N/A
Comments: This tree has below average crown. Could be removed or preserved if
maintained properly to restore.
124 — 10" Crape myrtle 3.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has an average crown that will improve if incorporated into a
maintained Iandscape.
r i
125 —10" Crape myrtle
3.0
N/A
Comments: Trees # 123, 124 & 125 are a cluster growing in a landscape planter at the
comer of Jones Street and N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. They could be used for landscaping
and will improve with proper maintenance. Recommend preservation.
126 — 5" Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) '3.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is growing in a retention pond adjacent to Jones Street and has been
previously topped along with trees # 127 & 131. Proper pruning can restore the structure.
Recommend preservation if retention pond will remain.
127 — 6" Bald cypress 3.0 N/A
Comments: See comments for tree #126.
128 —13" Sabal palm 6' C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: Good palm growing on the top of bank of retention pond. Recommend
preservation.
129 — 11" Sabal palm 5' C.T. 3.5
N/A
Comments: Good palm on top of bank of retention pond. Recommend preservation.
130 — 9" Live oak
2.0
N/A
Comments: This tree is located on the slope of the retention pond and has poor structure
with a codominant stem 3' above grade. Recommend removal.
131 — 7" Bald cypress 3.0 N/A
Comments: See comments for tree # 126.
132 —19" Live oak 3.5 27' -N, 26' -S, 40' -E, 5' -W
Comments: This tree has a lean to the east due to competition from tree # 133. The tree
has good crown density, a healthy systemic system and good structure. Recommend
preservation.
133 — 16" Laurel oak
1.0
N/A
Comments: This tree is severely declining and has dieback in leaders with sporophores
present on the trunk. The upper crown is mostly dead. Recommend removal.
134 — 3" Live oak
1.5
N/A
Comments: This tree is growing in a landscape buffer near Jones Street and has been
severely topped and is in poor Condition. Recommend removal.
135 — 24" Jacaranda 2.0 22' N, 24' -S, 25' -E, 20' -W
Comments: This tree is located 2' from the edge of the parking lot pavement. It has decay
in several leaders and some leaders have been previously topped. The tree also has large
surface roots, deadwood and stubs. Recommend removal-
13 6 —14" Arbor vitae (Platycladus orientalis) 2.5 N/A
Comments: This tree has an average crown that has been somewhat suppressed by tree #
135_ The foliage on the west side is sparse and detracts from appearance.
137 — 5" Live oak 1.5 N/A
Comments: This tree is located in a parking lot island and has been repeatedly topped and
has poor structure. Recommend removal.
138 — 6" Crape myrtle
2.5
N/A
Comments: This tree has nutrient deficiencies, has been pruned too hard and has a poor
appearance. Recommend removal or treatment to improve overall health.
139 —10" Sabal palm 1" C.T.
1.0
N/A
Comments: This palm is growing against the building and cannot be transplanted.
Recommend removal_
140 — 30" Hickory
1.5 24' -N, 27' -S, 30' -E, 22' -W
Comments: The upper crown of this tree is dead. Recommend removal.
141 — 5" Laurel oak
WE
N/A
Comments: This tree is growing in a narrow area between a building and the sidewalk.
There is no room for the canopy to develop. Recommend removal.
142 — 11 " Washington palm
3.0
N/A
Comments: Tall palm growing in the City right of way. Bark has sloughed off in some
spots and needs pruning. protect during construction.
143 — 10" 12- stemmed Crape myrtle 2.0 N/A
Comments: This tree has poor form due to competition from other trees. Recommend
removal.
144 — 20" Live oak 3,0 N/A
Comments: This tree is growing in a tight area between two buildings. It has stubs and
the bark . on the lower east side is sloughing off. Paint has been sprayed on the trunk. It
has a good systemic system but an irregular crown. This is a borderline tree that could be
removed or preserved if maintained.
44: —18" 4 trunk Podocarpus
3.0
N/A
Comments: This tree has good form and appearance but is growing against a building. It
can be preserved after demolition.
146 — 5" Live oak 1.5 N/A
Comments: This tree has no 'form due to competition from adjacent tree. Recommend
removal.
147 — 24" Sche$lera (Schefflera actinophylla) 0.5 N/A
Comments: This is a weak wooded tree with decay present. Recommend removal
148 — 15" Cherry laurel
1.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is severely declining with large deadwood. It is a hazardous tree and
should be removed.
149 12" Sabal palm 9' C.T
3.0 N/A
Comments: This tree is healthy with an average crown. Recommend preservation.
150 —13" Sabal paten 20' C.T.
3.0 N/A
Comments: This would be a very good palm but the crown has been pruned back to
accommodate adjacent power wires. Recommend transplanting on site.
151— T' Golden rain tree (Koelreuteria elegans) 2.0 NIA
Cornments: This tree is growing into the wires and has a lop -sided crown. Recommend
removal.
152 —15" Golden rain tree 2.5 5' -N, 10' -S, 8' -E, 16' -W
Comments: This tree has a large cavity developing in the base and is growing into the
wires. It has poor form and should be removed.
1.53 —13" Golden rain tree 2.5 N/A
Comments: This tree has an irregular crown and a cavity in the trunk 2' above the grade.
It has poor form and should be removed.
154 — 8" Cherry laurel
2.0
N/A
Comments: This tree has virtually no crown formation. Recommend removal
155 —15" Cherry laurel 2.0 6' -N, 21' -S, T -E, 12' -W
Comments: This tree has decay in the trunk and mistletoe in the crown. Recommend
removal.
156 —15" Chevy laurel 1.5 N/A
Comments: This tree has a wound on the trunk, mistletoe in the crown. The crown is
thinning and dying back. Recommend removal.
157 — 23" Jacaranda 2.0 34' -N, 28' -S, 9' -E, 15' -W
Comments: This tree has a large cavity at the base on the southwest side and a small
cavity on the east side. It has a codominant stem with included bark in the main crotch.
Recommend removal.
158 —15" sabal palm 8' C.T. 3.5 N/A
Comments: Tree is growing in the Osceola street right of way. It is a good palm, protect
during construction.
159 — 20" Sabal palm
3.0
N/A
Comments: This paln has a lean to the west due to the presence of a three story house.
Recommend preserving at its present location or transplant on site.
160 —16' hickory
3.0 18' -N, 14' -S, 15' -E, 15' -W
Comments: This tree is growing P from a house but has good crown density and a
healthy systemic system. It can develop into a good tree with proper pruning.
Recommend preservation.
BOEN'S TREE SERVICE
P.O. Box 86
Ozona, Fl., 34660 -0086
Tree Inventory - Prepared for Triangle Development Inc.
To: Mr. Thomas Coates, Triangle Development Inc.
Re: Tree Inventory: 312 — 404 North Osceola Avenue
Site overview and canopy
The following report is submitted by Boen's Tree Service, Inj_r T ��M NJ we
believe are accurate based on our education, experience and knowledge in the field of
Arboriculture. Boen's Tree Service has no interest personally or financially in this property and
our report is factual and unbiased. This report is the property of Triangle Development Inc., and
will not be given to other entities unless so directed.
Site Overview and Canopy Analysis
The subject property is located on a bluff that slopes down to the shoreline of Clearwater Harbor
and has historically been utilized for single family homes. The site has been essentially cleared
of all old growth trees and native mid -story and understory vegetation. The tree canopy is
comprised of second growth native tree species typical of the bluff environment and dominated
by live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), pignut hickory (Carya glabra)
and the native sabal palm (Sabal palmetto). The invasive exotic Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus
terebinthifolius) has colonized throughout the site forming dense thickets close to the shoreline.
The inter -tidal zone supports a moderate population of mangroves including red mangrove
(Rhizophora mangle), black mangrove (Avicennia germinans) and white mangrove
(Laguncularia racemosa). The site's understory vegetation is an admixture of ornamental
shrubs, grasses and vines.
The site supports few high quality trees but is laden with valuable palms including picturesque
mature sabal palms and two potential high quality clusters of the Senegal date palm (Phoenix
reclinata). The preservation of the high quality palms should be a priority. The palms can be
preserved in place or transplanted on site. The overall condition of the site trees is below
average as they reflect general neglect and improper maintenance. Several trees have suffered
from natural stresses including wind damage, drought, lightning and vine accumulations in the
crown. In addition, numerous trees had poor form and weak structure. This site does not contain
trees of the quality that would warrant major site plan modification to ensure their preservation.
There are however, trees that are sufficient in health, structure and appearance that should be
preserved if possible. The ultimate purpose of a tree inventory is to provide the development
team a hierarchy of existing trees by identifying the trees and palms most worthy of
_I
REMOVE 130 TREES (ELD2006- 05030)
1"%RRiSON VILLAGEIISLAND VIEW __
Inn; n: D u il-a -s ' 277P i h%
T
preservation. The criteria used for evaluating individual trees are described in the following
narrative.
Tree Inventory Data
A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a valuable
tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could lead to failure and
cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four codes and also has a
comment section. The following is an explanation of the inventory data:
Tree# - location - Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds
with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the field.
Size — Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If there
is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area below the fork.
Species — Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in the
inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter.
Condition Rating — The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural
strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities,
decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments,
i.e., well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk, codominant
stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included bark.
Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net
photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health will
have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree as needed.
Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating include: 1) live
crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2) crown density (density
of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the tree is making and storing
energy.
The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique
features. The rating scale is 0 -6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are
used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as follows:
0- A dead tree
1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease or a
tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1 ecological
pest i:e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). A tree with a rating of 1 should be
removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage.
2 — A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with included bark at
or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback, cracked/split
scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low energy, low live crown
ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems. A tree
with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s) can be treated. A tree with a 42
condition rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an
upgrade of the condition rating.
3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be corrected
with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal area that will be
subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon have included bark can
be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appearance, crown density and live
crown ratio and should be preserved if possible.
4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems that can
be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appearance and
be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above
average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small
cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if
they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of
4 is valuable to the property and should be preserved.
5 — A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and
virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this category
should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category
should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding
construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value to the site and should be
incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is worthy of significant site plan
modification to ensure its preservation.
6. — A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities
in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio, form (balanced
,.crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness. A great effort should be
made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the
tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to
the branch spread) to grow in. Only an experienced and competent 'International Society of
Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree.
Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not covered
in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may include
maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It may also have
recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree.
U
NOTE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3 -5 years. However, events such as drought,
lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance and severe storms can
downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial maintenance can upgrade the
value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely affected have the tree inspected by a
qualified International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTE: This inventory was performed on March 29 & 30 and at that time
deciduous trees such as the pignut hickory (Carya glabra) had no foliage present and trees such
as the evergreen live oak (Quercus virginiana) and semi - evergreen laurel oak (Quercus
laurifolia)trees were in flower (catkins) and had very little foliage present. The systemic health
and live crown ratio was determined by the presence and concentration of flowers and leaf buds.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Tree Inventory
Tree# Size Species Rating Crown Spread
1 30" red bay (Persea borbonia.) 2.0
Comments: This tree's crown is composed of four large scaffold branches two of which have
severe dieback and large dead wood and will need to be removed. The deadwood is over the
public sidewalk and constitutes a hazard. The tree is in an overall state of decline and should be
removed.
2 12" podocarpus (Podocarpus macrophyllus) 3.0 6' radius
Comments: This tree has a codominant stem with included bark in the upper crown but it is not
considered a hazard in this species. This tree has an attractive crown and could be preserved.
3 9" laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia)
Comments:
4 4 ", 5" arborvitae (Thuja orientalis)
3.0 13'N, 12'S, 15'E, 14'W
2.0
Comments: This tree is growing between the steps of the house's porch and has no crown on the
west side. The tree has very poor aesthetic appeal.
NOTE: All tree species identified as invasive exotic trees on the category #1 list published
by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council will be given a rating of 1.5 or less and
recommended for removal.
5 8" camphor (Cinnamomum camphora) 1.5
Comments: Invasive exotic.
6 10" laurel oak
Comments: n/a
7 8" laurel oak
3.0 10'N, 7'S, 9'E, 12'W
2.5
Comments: This tree has a mistletoe infestation on two branches and has flush cuts on the trunk
that will cause decay. This tree also has a codominant stem in the scaffold branches of the crown
that down grades the tree. Recommend removal.
*8 6' Canary Island palm (Phoenix canariensis) 3.0
Comments: *This palm is not protected by City code as it has less than 10' of clear trunk.
However, it is healthy and could be utilized in the site landscaping and if maintained properly
will evolve into a good palm. This palm could be preserved in place or transplanted on site.
9
12'
C.T.
sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 3.0
6' radius
10
13'
C.T.
queen palm (Syagrus romanzojfzana) 3.5
6' radius
Comments:
11 39" live oak (Quercus virginiana) 3.5 20' N, 40'S, 33'E, 2 P W
Comments: n/a
12 4" pignut hickory (Carya glabra) 2.5
Comments: This tree is young and healthy but is growing directly into the lateral branches of
tree #11 and has no where for the crown to grow.
13 6" hickory 2.0
Comments: The crown of this tree has been smothered by vines and the live crown ratio is very
low.
14 40" strangler fig (Ficus aurea) 1.5
Comments: This native ficus tree is a menace to properties as it can reach a width of 90' and
produce massive surface roots that damage pavements and other structures. Recommend
removal.
15 18' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: n/a
16 15' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
17 20' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: n/a
18 7" camphor
Comments: category #I invasive exotic
19 28" live oak
1.5
3.0 30'N, 25'S, 35'W, WE
Comments: This tree has a sound trunk, root flare and very good overall structure. The down
grading factor of this tree is the below average live crown ratio and twig dieback. It is difficult
to pinpoint the source of the dieback but it could be a combination of root loss, wind damage
from last year's severe storms and a vine infestation. Even minimal impact to the root system
from new construction will adversely affect this tree. This tree is only recommended for
preservation if a rooting area equal to the dripline formula can be provided. This tree's crown is
one -sided to the west.
20 16' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 . 6' radius
Comments: n/a
21 79, 7 ", 659, 6 ", 5 ", 4 ", 4" laurel oak 1.0
Comments: This tree has seven stems that emerge from a single trunk and they are all
codominant to one another 1' above grade. This type of attachment is "a prescription for future
failure and cannot be corrected through pruning. The tree has very good systemic health but the
structure is severe, recommend removal.
22 14' C.T. cabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm is at the shoreline and has a sweeping trunk. It would provide high
aesthetic value. Recommend preservation.
23 13' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: See comment for #22.
24 10' C.T. sabal palm 2.5
Comments: This palm has a trunk restriction 7' above grade and the crown has been impacted
by Brazilian pepper' trees. This palm could be preserved however and the condition should
improve when the pepper trees are removed.
25* < 10' C.T. cluster Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata) n/a
Comments: This palm cluster does not have a stem with at least 10' of clear trunk and therefore
is not protected by city code. However, it is identified in the inventory because it is healthy and
has high aesthetic appeal and commercial value. The palm has not been pruned but once pruned
and maintained properly should evolve into a landscape centerpiece.
26 28" live oak 3.0 20'N, 30'S, 24'E, 26'W
Comments: This tree is covered with vines. The structure is above average but the down grading
factor is the below average live crown ratio. The crown has dieback and deadwood but if pruned
will improve in appearance. Recommend preservation only if a rooting area equal to the dripline
formula is provided.
27 10' C.T. sabal palm
Comments: n/a
28 20" red bay
3.0 6' radius
3.5 30'N, 34'S, 28'E, 0'W
Comments: A one -sided tree that needs pruning to improve the appearance. It has good structure
and above average live crown ratio.
29 12" laurel oak 3.0 0'N, 15 "S, 10'E, 12'S
Comments: This tree has a one -sided crown with very good live crown ratio and overall
structure. The trunk is growing 6" from a sabal .palm and 2' from an oak to the north. If the sabal
palm and oak tree were removed. this tree would evolve into a good tree.
30 26' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius
I
Comments: This palm is downgraded because it is growing against an oak tree trunk for 5'
above grade. It cannot be transplanted and will likely be injured when the oak is removed.
However, if the oak is removed very carefully this palm could stay and would be upgraded as it
is a beautiful palm.
31 IV laurel oak 2.5
Comments: This tree is growing in competition with tree #29 and palm #30. The palm is
actually growing against the trunk and causing a slight indentation. This tree has below average
upper crown structure and poor form and is downgraded accordingly. If this tree is carefully
removed the palm could be preserved.
32 clugter ear tree (Enterolobium cyclocarpa) 0.5
Comments: This exotic tree species is highly undesirable as the wood is very brittle and it shears
readily in high winds. In addition, the ear tree has weak roots and is prone to uplift completely
during severe weather. Recommend removal.
33 27" hickory 4.5 25'N, 21'S, 24'E, 30'W
Comments: This tree was completely bare when it was assessed however, it had an extremely
high concentration of leaf buds indicating high live crown ratio. The overall structure is very
good. The tree needs pruning to remove stubs and minor deadwood. Recommend preservation.
34 14" cherry laurel (Prunus caroliniana) 1.5
Comments: This tree has decay in the trunk and upper scaffold branches. It is in an overall state
of decline and should be removed.
35 4" citrus (Citrus spp.) 1.0
Comments: This tree has a fungus disease that is causing decline. It is irreversible and the tree
needs to be removed.
36 20' C.T. queen palm 3.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
37 23" laurel oak 1.0
Comments: This tree has a large cavity in the main crotch that has weakened the crotch and
predisposed it to failure. The tree is a hazard and, a threat to fail. Remove as soon as possible.
l Y.
38 8" camphor
Comments: Category #I invasive exotic
39 10' C.T. sabal palm
Comments: n/a
40 12" laurel oak
1.5
3.0 6' radius
3.0 15'N, 13'S, 15'E, 14'W
Comments: This tree has a symmetrical crown with above average overall structure. The live
crown ratio is good. This tree could evolve into a good tree if preserved and maintained
properly.
41 10" Chinaberry (Melia azedarach) 0.5
Comments: This tree has very poor form and structure as it has been topped. In addition, it is a
category #I invasive exotic. Recommend removal.
42 5" chinaberry 0.5
Comments: category #1 invasive exotic
43 6" red bay
2.0
Comments: This tree has very poor structure and form. Recommend removal.
44 25' C.T. queen palm 4.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm is a very good palm but is growing 2' from the existing house and will
need to be protected during demolition if the palm is to be preserved.
45 <10' C.T. Canary Island palm n/a
Comments: This palm has only 4' of clear trunk and as such is not protected by city code.
However, it has a beautiful crown and could be preserved in place or moved on site.
Recommend preservation.
46 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: This palm is growing against the foundation of the house and will be very hard to
preserve.
47 20' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: n/a
48 27" live oak 4.0 45'N, 42'S, 25'E, 45'W
Comments: This tree has a good root flare and trunk. In addition, it has good form and structure
in the upper crown. The most downgrading factor is that large diameter branches have been
stubbed off on the east side due to the presence of utility wires. The stubs need to be removed.
However, this is a very good overall tree. Recommend preservation.
49 12" cherry laurel 2.5
Comments: This tree is starting to show dieback in the crown and it has a damaging girdling
root at the base.
50 8" cherry laurel 2.0
Comments: This tree has a one -sided crown and is starting to dieback. In addition, it has a large
wound on the trunk.
51 14" live oak 3.0 20'N, 18'S, 25'E, 0' W
Comments: This tree has below average structure and form. The tree is rated 3.0 because it is
systemically healthy and could evolve into a good tree if preserved and maintained properly.
52 20' C.T. cabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
53 11' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
54 17" red bay 2.0
Comments: This tree has poor form and structure and has several broken branches in the crown.
55 6" laurel oak 2.5
5 s
Comments: This tree is downgraded because it has very poor form.
56 4" cherry laurel 2.0
Comments: The top has been broken out of this tree and it needs to be removed.
57 7" cherry laurel 1.5
Comments: The crown of this tree is bent over due to the overhead canopy of adjacent trees. The
tree has poor form and structure.
58 8" cherry laurel 2.0
Comments: This tree has poor form and structure.
59 9" cherry laurel 2.0
Comments: This tree has poor form and structure and dieback in the crown.
60 .12" cherry laurel 0.0
Comments: dead tree
61 4" cherry laurel 1.0
Comments: This tree has very poor overall form and structure.
62 11" cherry laurel 1.5
Comments: This tree has a codominant in the main fork and very poor form.
63 20 ", 10 ", 6" red bay 1.5
Comments: This tree was shown on the survey as a 13" tree but is actually 28" diameter at the
base and 36" in diameter at 4.5' above grade. The 10" diameter leader has a large vertical crack
and it will have to be removed. The remainder of the tree has very poor structure. Recommend
removal.
64 4" red bay 1.5
Comments: This tree has very poor form as it bends beneath the canopy of an adjacent tree.
� r
65 12" chinaberry 1.0
Comments: This tree is a category # 1 invasive exotic species and an overall noxious tree.
Recommend removal.
66 5 ", 5 ", 6" red bay 1.5
Comments; This tree is tri- dominant at the base and has very poor overall structure and form.
67 953, 11" laurel oak 2.0
Comments: This tree has a severe codominant attachment with included bark 1' above grade.
Recommend removal.
68 11' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
69 24' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 6' radius
Comments: This tree is very attractive but needs vines removed from trunk if it is preserved.
70 8" hickory 2.5
Comments: This tree has a one -sided crown growing to the southeast. It has a codominant stem
with included bark 6' above grade in two scaffold branches.
71 23' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm is exceptionally attractive and healthy. It is located on the slope of the
bluff and could be preserved in place or transplanted on site. Recommend preservation.
72 22' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm has a superb crown and should be preserved or transplanted on site.
73 11 ", 6" camphor 1.5
Comments: This tree has poor form, dieback, a codominant stem and is a category #1 invasive
exotic species.
74 29" live oak 3.5 0'N, 50'S, 0'E, 42'W
I
Comments: This tree has a sound trunk and root flare. The overall structure is exceptional and
live crown ratio is above average. The form is slightly below average as it is essentially a one -
sided tree.
75 7 -stems >10' Senegal date palm cluster 5.0 12' radius
Comments: The Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata) is extremely valuable as a landscape
feature. This cluster has seven stems with over 10' of clear trunk and several others of various
sizes. The palm has not been pruned for an extremely long time and presently presents a shabby
appearance. However, once pruned it will be striking. It is located at the toe of the slope and
could be preserved in place if it is not in conflict with the site development. Otherwise the palm
should be transplanted on site if feasible. Recommend consulting with a palm broker.
76 30' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm has an attractive curve to the west. There is a branch from a nearby oak
tree that is rubbing the crown. This branch should be removed if the palm is preserved.
77 17" red bay 0.5
Comments: This tree has a 12" diameter dead stem and the remainder of the tree is in decline.
This tree is a hazard, recommend removal.
78 4 —stems >10' Senegal date palm cluster 4.5 12' radius
Comments: This palm cluster is located by the shoreline in an area where it should be able to be
preserved. It will make a beautiful landscape feature if pruned properly. Recommend
preservation.
79 20" C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius
Comments: This palm is located by the shoreline and is a beautiful palm. Recommend
preservation.
80 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
81 32' C.T. sabal palm 1 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm would be a specimen except for a few small wounds on the trunk.
Recommend preservation.
82 12' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
83 20' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm has an attractive trunk that curves to the east and then back to the west.
Recommend preservation.
84 8" camphor 1.5
Comments: This tree is covered with vines and has poor form. It is also a category #1 invasive
exotic. Recommend removal.
85 4" laurel oak
0.5
Comments: The crown of this tree was blown off in the storm. Recommend removal.
86 6" hickory
2.5
Comments: This tree has suffered storm damage to the crown on the south side and the crown is
saturated with vines. Recommend removal.
87 8" hickory 3.5 10'N, 5'S, 0'E, 15'W
Comments: This tree has a straight trunk with good overall structure. The live crown ratio is
above average. The form is irregular which downgrades the tree's value. If this tree is preserved
and maintained properly it will evolve into a good tree. Recommend preservation.
88 10" hickory 0.5
Comments: The top of this tree has suffered irreparable damage. Recommend removal.
89 30' C.T. sabal palm 5.5 6' radius
Comments: A near specimen quality palm. It is picturesque. There are a few blemishes on the
trunk that downgrade this palm. Recommend preservation.
90 30' C.T. cabal palm 5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm has an attractive curve in the trunk. This palm if preserved with #89
would make an attractive feature. If they are in the way of new construction recommend
transplanting on site.
91 20' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius
Comments: A beautiful palm, recommend preservation.
92 4" hickory 2.5
Comments: This tree has poor form and is covered with vines.
93 12' C.T. sabal palm. 3.5 6' radius
Comments: A good palm, recommend preservation.
94 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: A good palm, recommend preservation.
95 11' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius
Comments: n/a
96 6" cherry laurel 2.0
Comments: This tree has below average form and structure.
97. 11" hickory 4.5 15'N, 15' S, 15'E, 15'W
Comments: This tree has a sound trunk . and root flare and good overall structure. The form is
basically symmetrical and the live crown ratio is very good. Recommend preservation.
98 20' C.T. queen palm 2.5
Comments: This palm has a beautiful crown but has a large decayed area on the north side of the
trunk that is a significant down grade.
99 10' C.T. queen palm 2.5
Comments: This palm has wires wrapped around the trunk and an anemic trunk.
100 14" laurel oak 2.5
Comments: This tree has a codominant stem 7' above grade that has included bark. It has a
bulge at the fork indicating interior wounding. This tree also has a minor mistletoe infestation.
Recommend removal,
101 16 ", 1551, 15 ", 8" hickory 2.0
Comments: This tree is downgraded because of the severe codominant attachment' at the base of
the three large codominant stems. The 16" diameter stem is severely included to one of the 15"
diameter stems. The two 15" stems have connective tissue between the stems but there is some
decay in the crotch. There is also a girdling root that is causing a problem. The upper crown
structure is very good and the live crown ratio is superb. The form is also exceptionally good
and the tree has high aesthetic value. However, the codominant situation in the base is a major
concern as this type of a situation can lead to dramatic failure. If the tree was braced with rods
its condition would be upgraded however, this procedure is relatively expensive. This tree may
be in the public right of way, if so check with the City of Clearwater's Urban Forestry Division
(562 -4950) to inquire if they would be willing to perform cabling and bracing on this tree.
Recommend removal if this tree is not secured by cabling and bracing.
102 23" laurel oak 3.5 25'N, 22'S, 20'E, 14'W
Comments: This tree has good upper crown structure and above average live crown ratio. The
tree has a cavity 8' above grade but the tree should solve this wound. The overall form is good
and this tree will evolve into a good tree if preserved. Recommend preservation.
103 21' C.T. sabal palm
5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm is almost a specimen. Recommend preservation.
104 .18' C.T. sabal palm
5.0 6' radius
Comments: This palm has a beautiful crown and an almost flawless trunk.
105 21' C.T. cabal palm
Comments: A very good palm.
106 20' C.T. sabal palm
Comments: A very good palm.
107 19' C.T. sabal palm
Comments: A very good palm.
4.5 6' radius
4.5 6' radius
4.0 6' radius
108 14' C.T. sabal palm
3.5 6' radius
Comments: A good palm.
109 18" laurel oak
2.5
Comments: This tree has two
large branches that are rubbing against each other causing a
wound. The tree has a large trunk canker on the west side. The main fork has poor structure. The
upper crown structure has mostly epicormic growth likely from topping or storm damage a long
time ago. The live crown ratio is very good. Recommend removal.
110 15' C.T. sabal palm
3.5 6' radius
Comments: A good palm.
111 15' C.T. sabal palm
4.0 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
112 20' C.T. sabal palm
4.5 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
113 17' C.T. sabal palm
4.5 6' radius .
Comments: A very good palm.
114 20' C.T. sabal palm
3.5 6' radius
Comments: A good palm.
115 16' C.T. sabal palm
4.5 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
116 20' C.T. .. sabal palm
5.0 6' radius
Comments: A superb palm.
117 20' C.T. sabal palm
5.0 6' radius
Comments: A superb palm.
k it, *
118 19' C.T. sabal palm
Comments: A very good palm.
119 20' C.T. sabal palm
Comments: A very good palm.
120 24' C.T. sabal palm
Comments: A very good palm.
121 13" laurel oak
4.5 6' radius
4.5 6' radius
4.5 6' radius
2.5
Comments: This tree is growing next to a laurel oak tree, #122, and is codominant at the base
with that tree. The two trees are fused together at the root collar. The upper crown structure and
live crown ratio are average.
122 10" laurel oak 2.0
Comments: This tree is attached at the base to tree #121 which downgrades the tree's overall
condition. In addition, it has poor form and is covered with vines.
123 12" camphor 1.5
Comments: This tree is diseased, has deadwood and is a category #1 invasive exotic species.
Recommend removal.
124 18' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: A good palm.
125 14' C.T. sabal palm 2.5
Comments: This palm is covered with vines and Brazilian pepper trees. If the vines and peppers -
trees are removed it will evolve into a good palm.
126 5" laurel oak 3.0 7'N, 7'S, 7'E, 5'W
Comments: This tree has average structure and form. The live crown ratio is above average. It is
surrounded by pepper trees. If they are removed the tree will evolve into a good tree.
Note: Tree's # 127 & 128 appear just south of the property line of 312 N. Osceola Avenue and
may have been inventoried in the previous tree inventory for the property south of 312 N.
Osceola. If this determination is made the trees will be removed. from the survey to avoid
incorrect assessments in the tree mitigation process.
127 17' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius
Comments: A very good palm.
128 16" laurel oak 3.5 15'N, 24' S, 12 11E, 18' W
Comments: This tree has very good upper crown structure and a high live crown ratio. The
crown is somewhat one -sided to the south but is attractive. The tree has a palm growing into its
base that has caused a slight indentation but it is not at all debilitating.
129 25" live oak 3.5 40'N, 37'S, 25'E, 30'W
Comments: This tree was not located on the original tree survey but was field located and the
location has been identified on that survey. It will appear on the revised tree survey. This tree
has average live crown ratio and good overall structure. It has a vase shaped crown and needs
pruning to remove minor deadwood and heavy moss accumulations. Recommend preservation.
s7s° t'-)
tea"
y
amsm
m«
0
m
., `
m
g/®
por
5�4
49.6`
AIR CONDITIONER UNIT
BLDG =
BUILDING
ci
(C) =
CALCULATED DATA
= BOLLARD or POST
CCR =
CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD
= BOX, CABLE TELEVISION
CLF =
COLUMN CORNER
= BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY
Lw
•'°
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
FA-1 = BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY (TRANSFORMER)
0.3' N X 0.2' E
CONCRETE
= BOX, TELEPHONE
,
CORNER
CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK
= DECORATIVE LIGHT POLE
= FIRE HYDRANT
C DT =
) =
/(}�'
= FLAGPOLE
DB =
DEED BOOK
- RED END SECTION
DIP =
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
4.
ECMP =
ELUP11CAL CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
= GROUND LIGHT
EL =
ELEVATION
E- = GUY ANCHOR
EP =
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
x = LIGHT POLE, CONCRETE
CP =
ELLIPTICAL REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
= LIGHT POLE, METAL
(F) =
FIELD DATA
= LIGHT POLE, WOOD
FCM =
FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT
= MAILBOX
FOOT =
SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 S., RANGE 15 E.2
3 G 07ez (p
( C ( rA
HARRISON BASED ON BOEN'S TREE SERVICE INVENTORY REPORT FOR
VILLAGE AND ISLAND CONDOMINIUM
OSCEOLA AVENUE
l
1 r-r- LA1'11 I I A IZ)l. N VILLAUL ANU
11,
ISLAND VIEW CONDOMINIUM
A/C =
AIR CONDITIONER UNIT
BLDG =
BUILDING
MM = BACKFLOW PRE TER
(C) =
CALCULATED DATA
= BOLLARD or POST
CCR =
CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD
= BOX, CABLE TELEVISION
CLF =
CHAIN LINK FENCE
= BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY
CMP =
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
FA-1 = BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY (TRANSFORMER)
CONIC =
CONCRETE
= BOX, TELEPHONE
COR =
CPB =
CORNER
CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK
= DECORATIVE LIGHT POLE
= FIRE HYDRANT
C DT =
) =
CURB TIE
DEED DATA
= FLAGPOLE
DB =
DEED BOOK
- RED END SECTION
DIP =
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
- = GRATE INLET
ECMP =
ELUP11CAL CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
= GROUND LIGHT
EL =
ELEVATION
E- = GUY ANCHOR
EP =
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
x = LIGHT POLE, CONCRETE
CP =
ELLIPTICAL REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
= LIGHT POLE, METAL
(F) =
FIELD DATA
= LIGHT POLE, WOOD
FCM =
FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT
= MAILBOX
FOOT =
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FIR =
FOUND IRON ROD
= MANHOLE, ELECTRIC
FND =
FOUND NAIL do DISC
= MANHOLE, GREASE TRAP
FOP -
FOUND OPEN PIPE
O = MANHOLE, SANITARY SEWER
FPP =
FOUND PINCHED PIPE
= MANHOLE, STORM SEWER
FRRS =
FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE
= MANHOLE, TELEPHONE
F/T =
FENCE TIE
= METER, ELECTRIC
FXC =
FOUND X -CUT
= METER, GAS
GE =
GRATE ELEVATION
gg = METER, RECLAIMED WATER
IE -
(L) =
INVERT ELEVATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATA
90 = METER, WATER
LB -
LICENSED BUSINESS
= MITERED END SECTION
LS =
LICENSED SURVEYOR
= MONITORING WELL
MAS =
MASONRY
= PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNAL
MHW =
MEAN HIGH WATER
= SANITARY CLEANOUIT
NP =
NORMAL POOL
= SCHEDULE B -2 ITEM
O/A =
OVERALL
= TELEPHONE RISER
OR =
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
-W- = TRAFFIC SIGN
(P) =
PLAT DATA
= TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX
PB =
PLAT BOOK
= TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE
PG =
PLS =
PAGE
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
= UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION MARKER
POB =
POINT OF BEGINNING
= UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION WARNING SIGN
POC =
POINT COMMENCEMENT
= UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC MARKER
PRM =
E MONUMENT
PERMANEE NT T REFERENCE FERENN CE M ONUMENT
= UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WARNING SIGN
PSM =
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR do MAPPER
= UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC MARKER
P/T =
PAVEMENT TIE
= UNDERGROUND FIBER OP11C WARNING SIGN
PVC =
POLY VINYL CHLORIDE
= UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN MARKER
RCP =
REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
= UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN WARNING SIGN
RLS =
REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
= UNDERGROUND GAS MARKER
R/W =
RIGHT -OF -WAY
= UNDERGROUND GAS WARNING SIGN
SEC =
SHW =
SECTION
SEASONAL HIGH WATER
= UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER MARKER
SIR =
SET IRON ROD 1/2" LB 6113
= UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER WARNING SIGN
SND =
SET NAIL & DISC LB 6113
M = UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER MARKER
SR =
STATE ROAD
= UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER WARNING SIGN
S/T =
SIDEWALK TIE
= UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE MARKER
STY =
STORY
= UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WARNING SIGN
SW =
SIDEWALK
= UNDERGROUND WATER MARKER
TBM =
TEMPORARY BENCH MARK
= UNDERGROUND WATER WARNING SIGN
( ) =
TYPICAL
® = UTILITY POLE, CONCRETE
VCP =
VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE
= UTILITY POLE, METAL
W/ =
WF =
WITH
WOOD FENCE
= UTILITY POLE, WOOD
W/T =
WALL TIE
=VALVE' GAS
RV 001 = VALVE, RECLAIMED WATER
+ 25.25
= POINT OF ELEVATION
sv = VALVE, SANITARY
25.2'
= DIMENSION FROM BUILDING TO
WV = VALVE, WATER
BOUNDARY / RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE
- WELL
STOR CURB INLETS:
' °: = CONCRETE
= ASPHALT
_ CONCRETE, PAVERS
= BRICK
= TOP OF BANK
= TOE OF SLOPE
or CENTER LINE OF DITCH
= 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
= OVERHEAD U1ILITY LINES
-
- - -° --G- -- = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND GAS LINE
-
-W ®- - = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER LINE
-
-� - - -F- •- = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FORC AIN
- = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER LINE
- - - = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER LINE
R — = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER LINE
3 G 07ez (p
( C ( rA
HARRISON BASED ON BOEN'S TREE SERVICE INVENTORY REPORT FOR
VILLAGE AND ISLAND CONDOMINIUM
OSCEOLA AVENUE
l
1 r-r- LA1'11 I I A IZ)l. N VILLAUL ANU
11,
ISLAND VIEW CONDOMINIUM
PREPARED FOR:
TRIANGLE V L L
CD '7;
0 LAR98 ASSOCIATES
IaI�
u
�,a j�j-
�'�'
2915 S.R. SUITE 1
` L
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759
(%2% fig` -05�
�$g� �
kF(a, y¢`�'�Iyw p/y C)
> V/
i3
CHECKED BY: SCALE: DRAWN BY: JOB NO. I DRAWING PATH:
e
SHEET_p ,
JOD 1 =40 1GRM1/MEP 02 -3324 1 H: \JN\ 3324\ dwg \treeexhibitharrisanondisf and. d
g 1 OF : °ry ; I nJ
CO
F3
FIN
1y,
TREE INVENTORY
BOEN'S TREE i
CONDITIONER
BLDG
►
CALCULATED DATA
CCR =
CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD
CLF =
CHAIN LINK FENCE
CORRUGATED
O,
cca
O.
CORNER
r. =
j
APPROXIMATE r r OFUNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER LINE
T
CURB
%T
z
1:
DEED BOOK
DIP
DUCTILE Yr PIPE
ECMP
ELLIPTICAL CORRUGATED ..
EL
® yA
EP
EDGE OF
r C•
ELLIPTICAL REINFORCE r ■ r►
FIELD DATA
FCM
FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT
• =
FOUND IRON •r►
► =
FOUND NAIL w DISC
#r
J f l t+J
s. Y
FOUND PINCHED PIPE
FRRS =
FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE
F/T =
FENCE TIE
CIV
Lu
GRATE ELEVA11ON
IE =
fJ
d
"t
DESCRIPTION ► "...
LB =
03
LS =
�^
MASONRY
MHW-
MEAN HIGH WATER
NP
NORMAL r r
1 .
OVERALL
OR
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
r
PLAT DATA
Y .
Y ; ►......:
PG
PAGE
PLS
PROFESSIONAL I SURVEYOR
■Or
POINT BEGINNING
POC
POINT OF i
MONUMENT
■r
J
P/T
PAVEMENT TIE
PVC
POLY VINYL CHLORIDE
RL
REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
R/W
RIGHT-OF-WAY
SEC
SECTION
SHW
SEASONAL HIGH WATER
SIR
SET rr '•I w r
i
SET NAIL & DISC LB 6113
SR
STATE ROAD
S/T
SIDEWALK TIE
STY
STORY
SW
SIDEWALK
TB
jjf wa
J 750- (L)
(TYP)
TYPICAL
VCP
VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE
W/
WITH
rrI FENCE
NUMBER
R =
TREE RATING
d
cd
�
fff
P
ja�yy gg ..qq
B.:iA 6i
7a
cry
s��.aot
CO
F3
FIN
1y,
TREE INVENTORY
BOEN'S TREE i
,'
CONDITIONER
BLDG
►
CALCULATED DATA
CCR =
CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD
CLF =
CHAIN LINK FENCE
CORRUGATED
O,
CONCRETE
O.
CORNER
r. =
CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK
APPROXIMATE r r OFUNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER LINE
T
CURB
%T
DEED 1 • a
1:
DEED BOOK
DIP
DUCTILE Yr PIPE
ECMP
ELLIPTICAL CORRUGATED ..
EL
ELEVATION
EP
EDGE OF
r C•
ELLIPTICAL REINFORCE r ■ r►
FIELD DATA
FCM
FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT
• =
FOUND IRON •r►
► =
FOUND NAIL w DISC
#r
FOUND OPEN PIPE
s. Y
FOUND PINCHED PIPE
FRRS =
FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE
F/T =
FENCE TIE
GE =
GRATE ELEVA11ON
IE =
INVERT ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION ► "...
LB =
LICENSED BUSINESS
LS =
LICENSED SURVEYOR
MASONRY
MHW-
MEAN HIGH WATER
NP
NORMAL r r
1 .
OVERALL
OR
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
r
PLAT DATA
Y .
Y ; ►......:
PG
PAGE
PLS
PROFESSIONAL I SURVEYOR
■Or
POINT BEGINNING
POC
POINT OF i
MONUMENT
■r
PROFESSIONAL r SURVEYOR MAPPER
P/T
PAVEMENT TIE
PVC
POLY VINYL CHLORIDE
RL
REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
R/W
RIGHT-OF-WAY
SEC
SECTION
SHW
SEASONAL HIGH WATER
SIR
SET rr '•I w r
i
SET NAIL & DISC LB 6113
SR
STATE ROAD
S/T
SIDEWALK TIE
STY
STORY
SW
SIDEWALK
TB
TEMPORARY r■ MARK
(TYP)
TYPICAL
VCP
VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE
W/
WITH
rrI FENCE
NUMBER
R =
TREE RATING
,'
Y OFBANK
OF SLOPE or - LINE OF DITCH
♦ OTHERWISE NOTED
= OVERHEAD U11UTY LINES
r
APPROXIMATE LOCA11ON OF UNDERGROUND
APPROXIMATE r • OF r •r
UNDERGROUND
APPROXIMATE r r OFUNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER LINE
-1-2t-F
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF I Yr SANITARY SEWER LINE
■ r
= APPROXIMATE r y! r OF UNDERGROUND r r SEWER LINE
lalcom
i • :t �`` mot` !`
a
0
a®
�s
c�
e^$
•:-
D E S C R I P T I O N
ix « a r a r: •� r # * •# • •.' • r + *r fix.
• r a �r �r rr � + Ii r r � « + � 1* •
CONTAINING 1.215 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL TWO
i � « k # s ,r� � r # i �..: « « ".a k � • � r ,r� �.:.. • #. r #. rir �,:
k � - ► r » w � « r k r « * • � • # # a � •fir � » �
jut
101AM 11
1010'" 741
PARCEL FOUR
TOGETHER WITH
TOGETHER NTH ALL LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND BOUNDED BY WESTERLY EXTENSIONS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH
BOUNDARY LINES AS DESCRIBED ABOVE, EXTENDED TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL IN CLEARWATER BAY AND ALL LITTORAL RIGHTS AND RIGHTS OF
ACCRETION APPURTENANT TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND,
LESS THE FOLLOWING:.
PARCEL THREE
- «rrr�r�#kir,k�
MGM • • x �y # « F ♦ + • R
» •x» +�� r r: r k • r
• a.
P#RTION PARCEL
Y
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OWNER'S POLICY NUMBER
10279610600000017.
NO VISIBLE ENCUMBRANCES
#
DIMENSION BUILDING
BOUNDARY / RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE
STORM C l LETS
® p
�*
r«r�rir�n
_.... , ,......
O« O..... BANK
A/C =
AIR CONDITIONER UNIT
CHAIN r.
BLDG =
BUILDING
aP = BACH
(C) =
CALCULATED DATA
= BOLL
CCR =
CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD
® = BOX,
CLF =
CHAIN LINK FENCE
IM = BOX,
CMP =
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
= BOX,
CONC =
CONCRETE
= BOX,
COR =
CORNER
= DEC(
CPB =
CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK
C/T =
CURB TIE
=FIRE
D) =
DEED DATA
= FLAG
DB =
DEED BOOK
C� = FLAB
DIP =
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
IM = GRAI
ECMP =
ELLIPTICAL CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
< = GROL
EL =
ELEVATION
F = GUY
EP =
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
= LIGH'
ERCP =
ELLIPTICAL REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
= LIGH°
(F) =
FIELD DATA
= LIGH'
FCM =
FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT
= MAILI
FDOT =
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FIR =
FOUND IRON ROD
Q =MAN!
FND =
FOUND NAIL & DISC
Q = MAN[
FOP =
FOUND OPEN PIPE
Q = MANt
FPP =
FOUND PINCHED PIPE
0 = MW
FRRS =
FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE
Q = . MANt
F/T =
FENCE TIE
® = METE
FXC =
FOUND X —CUT
= METE
GE =
GRATE ELEVATION
® = METE
IE =
INVERT ELEVATION
(L) =
LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATA
= METE
LB =
LICENSED BUSINESS
= MITEF
LS =
LICENSED SURVEYOR
�w = MONI
MAS =
MASONRY
= PEDE
MHW =
MEAN HIGH WATER
= SANI'
NP =
NORMAL POOL
0 = SCHE
O/A =
OVERALL
® = TELEI
OR =
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
= TRAF
(P) =
PLAT DATA
rsa = TRAF
PB =
PLAT BOOK
= TRAF
PG =
PAGE
= UNDE
PLS =
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
POB =
POINT OF BEGINNING
= UNDE
POO =
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
=UNDE
PRM =
PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT
ws = UNDE
PSM =
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER
= UNDE
P/T =
PAVEMENT TIE
ows = UNDE
PVC =
POLY VINYL CHLORIDE(
= UNDE
RCP =
REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
Fw = UNDE
RLS =
REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
= UNDE
R/W =
RIGHT —OF —`NAY
= UNDE
SEC =
SECTION
= UNDE
SHW =
SEASONAL HIGH WATER
SIR =
SET IRON ROD 1/2" LB 6113
= UNDE
SND =
SET NAIL & DISC LB 6113
= = UNDE
SR =
STATE ROAD
UNDE
S/T =
SIDEWALK TIE
= UNDE
STY =
STORY
= UNDE
SW =
SIDEWALK
= UNDE
TBM =
TEMPORARY BENCH MARK
= UNDE
(TYP) =
TYPICAL
a = UTILI®
VCP =
VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE
= UTILI`.
W/ =
WITH
UTILI`
WF =
WOOD FENCE
=
W/T =
WALL TIE
Gv = VALVI
RV = VALM
+ 25.25
= POINT OF ELEVATION
sv Doi = VALVI
DIMENSION BUILDING
BOUNDARY / RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE
STORM C l LETS
® p
�*
r«r�rir�n
_.... , ,......
O« O..... BANK
TOE OF l or OF DITCH
CHAIN r.
OVERHEAD
--G — — —G— —
= APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND GAS LINE
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER
APPROXIMATE LOCATION UNDERGROUND : Or i.
-R- — — --R— —
= APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER LINE
-12" PVC — — —
= APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER LINE
24" RCP— —
= APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER LINE
08/23/06 2
08/21 /06 1
DATE NUMBER
REVISED PARCEL 3 DESCRIPTION
ADDED SOUTH 24' PARCEL
REVISIONS
OD
SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 S., RANGE 15 E.1
k
6 2606
PREPARED
TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC
POLAF'?I ASSOCIATES INC.
PROFESSIONAL SURVE YING LB 6113
j
18850 HIGHWAY NORTH, i
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA .. a..
524-6500
O B NO. DRAWING Sl ra * !
!• 'G i +
I
g- - " - 7 .,,:, ��;-�_' ,_,',� �,-,-'- / � A -
, , - �,�, � , - �,�.�,,I,,.,�- �,� . �i`,`- 1,� I -
�., z . q,. ", �., ", n �� � " i�� _,,
`,-� , 19 / V
T32 16.59 16.58 +14.57 -,-, � I ", I
-, ,,x � . . . 4 1
5�19 - IZ95 . ��, -�,,�i���.�,�.',,',,-��-:��� I -; -_n,��,J_P,F�'Z',�-1�: , . � LOT I � 1
2,1 � . - . ' �;"�._ - � _ .,. , : � - � �
' ' ' - , -
11 . I . � ,
I - I � � _ ,�� . I �
� � . .
. . I - ,
� , , �1, ,
� . I � . I I I , MASONRY BUILDING M -_�,�5, _,��7 -,,,�,��,- zz�!,; // I I �' � 34_6`' - � ,
, Ill.' , , 4 � - I -�� � �'��, , ,g, �,Ilrrr ,
. I ��::V',,.'� _� �. � ,,��,' ,��c, �, �, ��i, -- e�
" � - - I � W�
. �_',, � -, ��, �i , -. -. -,� -,' �. _,�,'.� �, '51,.- -, '- -"S';1- -
� - 11
I , . .. / FF. ELEV=27,9 ,�,,,�!�-;�,���,��-,�"-:��,'z�', ."-,T-, ',�,',,,'�714�t� .
, ,
- ,il', ,
- - ,
A' ti_ - 7,46 1, ,
. ��'4�z�, ",-il',, 3Y.99- � I . .
�, ---_ .
� ��'� 4
,,
,
- .
I � � ��.' " . ,
�, � � fLj- POOL I I _��,_ -,,,�,��,,',,!�,',�;�;! Z
� _j � A � I I I
.
� TOP OF BLDG. ELEV=117.6 _-��, k'il
; � I I .
1 2.29 ' <' � � . , � 16.58 , -. -- , - �,�,,j',� ,., , -�� _'��117e_ -,-. " 4� -
_ �,�7 __� -
Lu . . � . 4 7�52- 1 +14,05 +26.86 ,6��'��f;� "�-!�,L"",I����,.,��l-'.��,-,�� � �,,�� ,,�, - ,
. I _5� A SANITARY MANHOLE . , ? z.-'.�'._,��",O , I
V.152 ;�; ,��',,-,',,,'-'�,�. � �_,,,-,,,�-,!N� ., 4-
t, �,, -- , . �
� - 1z " , - . 16�59 RIM EL = 28,86 _4� �Tz ,___ 11 . .
., �,k) 1. ` � -1-6-4 1 - - ,
, ..L". ',_A,.�. j,. .
,
_ ��,�f, �
- I � 4" �
I / � _�,,�__ - _� , 'I
. , , ��q -4-;mg3� -,, -
"I I I . � . � � /'-*------- APPROXIMATE � .r . .
�
- , �- � I � � N IE = 2t57 11 1_ 0, - , .. -
16-1, 1. , � I � "I , DRAT INL , NE IE = 2 - g�i,7,0.,�',� - ,:� ��_ "T, �
I FLOOD ZONE LINE - "�"-,--, . - '-, '.�g� -�- --� ... - .
. I ' " ' GE = f2.10 5.04 �6j- ,,;' " -- .- ; g _�.,��t, ,�, -,�ZN,,-, - ,� � -
. - �, ,, , z _
IE = L50 - . � - - OR ASS SE IE = 22�94 1 m ',2a , , 4,�'11';:'�V"�_, .- _ ' , �4 - _
0 . � � , � I /�-- - WALL 25.53 I .., .,92 111. �_- . - 0 -_ . � ,* I ' ' 0, ,
� r+ 1 �6 � -7.2a - o� ,� . CQN�C DEdK I ' ' ' AREA W IE 2. 1 / CONCRETE RETAINING 18.63 20,07+' COLUMN CORNER W IE = 21.57 :, ���'��;�,-,,�4'-,'�-�'�� - _� i� '4z,' .30.43. - -
I 1�1 ,�,�'T - - I � �
��, - b §5' . 1�
' ' ' ' ' 7 ' " "M_�`,�L *.. . . - , . .
c; � _j _ � ' . 7�80 � - �r 10 1 0,3! N X 0 2' E - �- - �
d � - '. 14- _
® -.. -4 � . �3 ):x 1 6.6 , 14.3 - � �-�:�?,rg_', , I ,
;I- 12. 12.52 E . . ", � .� , - - , - � - I - . . �4 � � c�
� - "', - * I , � I � -
c� 22,3 �_�,,.�,�-,.,�,,.� �-,'.,_`-,,� I !,� ,,, � "I. n
-1 . u � 1: , - .� 11
. 16,8
,.-s" �0 - ,� 30.01 ; � �. 30.86
, L- _'L -_ m'.v .. I .
&24 % 11s:91 I I I 28.94
�,
�
1�v,;O I
,-,�', -- - " ,, .5, ,!`.-,,,-,,A_�,�:7_ � , , -11.11, T_� j-, 111
2.77 � <_3 � ,_6.� �t-� - -4,-, ',- �� ,--
. , , -
4-�` ,,�'__'-��,-_`��_-,t.i _ , � *� i! �_Ilw '111, 1�r�-�- �;:��
N �� L16Z,�,- �_M, � ", , - � 7 Z_i �,-3; - -�'. 11C �.
- �-,`,-,�,�7,i�-,-,w� !'A, �, �- i - _,A._j. ;, � , -`-&,�
, , -_ - ,,, , - , �_, �, -1 ,-.; -�j,'---',_"v
I �rf��,�;,,,�-_,�,,,-�'_ ` ,� - -1 -1 -, -i 11� _1� __� __L - .��-;-p' - r: , I
_ _
., , :1 �
I +cl�,� / +N,�)_ +\% I _'� ,, F, cl, W_ 24,--7, a _. i�110�1832 �___ T�L _�, .. "Ill z J 1�11_,__, ���r'L�-�ix.�-".,r,�-F��-�-,�-r""'���, pm�,p
14 . , � � �� 7� �. , - �;,��,-,�.-,���',-,.,-,�?,-:,'�,j,
r, :-_ -1 -, - � . .- " , I
__�, '.�_�� 'P-�,Jx, ., , , , .: , i F,-���,�-i'�:7�--f�-,,.�,-��,-.-.
1� - -�, � �- .`� . . � , M '�,,,-rg,, -,'��--g�- , f �i�j ,._
- - , - - - :,��2R _ - Q_ _ � " ��, ',,--,' _�� `�7 ` -,7 �;I - -� , •4
,� - " �, - ,
Iq . ,t,� ,�,�,, 7�_� �.,� 5. ,' ,
+ #110 I - ,,, ,,, �!N - ,_ N "�.�� g,., - , - - s �
30 -''�� �_� "L'�--'-�*'�-'.��,�!,--�i---,-�'z'- !M,�,-r���,�-��44�.!�,�,-i---"�'46�:���,�, -���-�--�,���,�����,.,7-_,Pr�,��,'-",�,,�--"-����,,r.�L,��,,�'���'� �'-,.�-,�'�,�-z�,;�� "�,�,1,3�� F , �, ., /
, - - -�-.-- i'�k��, ---,,�.-,' , _ 'Y
,� .... .. �.
e
111_.&,;� _
, �
�
" - - - �',
, - - __ ' I _�'. ,�� !T� ,-,11 � _
- , �_
--.j�,_Q - 1`11, ,,, - �,�; - , - - -,-� �,� - 11 �_ - -'.i,___zs,�`-�'L- I
, - - , -- �Z.�5,2"`_� - ,9:141p- ,� . , - �' , ' -,,"�,, �, !� -,�' �; , ,_
'X�: � -, , _ Z,
'I. - ��k�,
I$= . f� F 4j-�,7 Q�'�,:f, �'Tr�_- �
� ,� - _ 'i;��_� _ ,!;�
, .I ��;_� u;,1��,��-,, _,," 77 ,
fill . , � , �j �_ -,
+0.3, +5.6 20' 1 ,�., - , % -,
�� �_1111 - 1 .. ,r
-� -, LLr,�,-,,, -,-r��m,
I I i ,�";� � t I �111 ; ,�� ro-,LL�� �T,r,mTg� ', �-3,; � -
+2.61 ; - 1. � , � �,�K�F,� - " � -,-,�',�s 7-.',r r ,,,,�;
;�,;��,,� E __ `,.`11.�., _4 ... _',_,�,_ - 11,� I
: 1�� , N " .- ,, �, -
H=44 �,� ,� _� �_ _,. Zl�, I _T1 � � -- t ___ - __ - -
iih ,�
#109 12' �1, - ;�,;,� � It,
EHH' iEEEEE - ' 14' 0 26.23 9.26 29.90i 30-7 1
6 q � . + W R-_Z5' + , I JID5 4b % O5 ,_ 31,00 �
1) �, 12. - . -.1 29.53 29.94 1_�•
/ � . 12 11 / 11=4�* 11 23' ij�k_ &� 4 ' 11
I ,=I 1 114' 1114 #113 to' - 14. 4,66 . 29.96 30.5 - -
SCALE: 1 " =30 ' ! 1-7 I:$ 2.65 115 R-3 5 R=4 5 41 11 11 26.4"" 692 , I '.. 1�� . 29.17 2 �51 29.64 .05
,
,
� + -13 END = �5,8 ,Q� #106 I'll, . . . . . . I . ---" � -
.
I ,D - ' R �5 1108 . 11 26.82 2114 � , . '-. . �
R-4 5 Q�* R C5 @),F= 13.5 9A 1 26.17 2665 - (9)6' ,,V I , ri�
I / _41� - I 4� R=3.5 1 19
,
I __ . ,, __ � ;: , c
-
;� ... �-_,,.- o __ .
,
i - - _' __ 2� -j- 4 ,� ��
I V ,; %�� �, � �
- , - ,� ,
L) <. �f,,�, _,,O: �i_-,'��
11 / 26,65 27.15 . A�11-
-
v,
� �1"'," ��-
. -
�je�::�,��k 7
Z�if ' cli
'
- -, "'� c � -
-1 12 it" 5.4 1 '4b #107 � , ,,-:D_,,,� ,Ey; , , .. '_ . I I ,i_
f,, / R=4.0 � � " - �.� �*�,-__ � :4 - , �, ,
n #117 / � I r - ,�,Icl I �",'�%t;,
. F , Z, Z�,_,-,_,�u�10 f Cl! � 1 �6 4 � 4 1
a) / _'.� R-V #119 - �-i'll-'--�'A �� , . -
�, � . � .
2 ... _ / � ;n . �, F,
, - / ,__', .
tv I '�V 264'13=4.5 - , IT- , _,� , ,�� " ,�-� I . � , �
- [ - 15 1, - 1� . . .
I 1� I . �
12
' I
�
�� I / / - . 1
#121 #120 _� 1, �--,M 7, 1,� � 4 � . '� '
f 2 4b , I I i . I I
/ 12' R-4 5 J2 1 , �', I _� �� CP 7 I �
r� . ,:,�!(,�X'�4-- I � �
-J, � R=ZS# I "R -_i7 t-',-,� � � .
- ilia s ID' - ' - / - �F
- �3 c3 - R=4.5 12 #122 1 4� R 5 .4i . I I .
1�11 / ro _�_ -I. -* - .
t�l ,t!tyc�
� ",
- T / #123 R=2.0 / / #9 �7 �.
/ �,- � , +11.6, 1_� �, "�' - -,
I r `."'�_,`��
+ IR I � i 11x A
Q� 111- � �
I< , �- ry All
'
-
,�� 14� Ov +17 R=L5 IV. .
R / Q� ,z_ 16, , I -1 P
�� / rv, 41* 1�1� ��,W,_;'-
+ 6' 1 _,F.
2jj , "I"a-1 �r- -
-
124 3. - -N-1w � -, � -q-_ - - - - __ - _ _ , -
ffl3 %L_ �,'&,e!-._",�-' ,-,W�4;,
# - - - ";', � - lz
I i,
."� i�l 11 �-
Qz� 1�� - , ;. ',-, r - � 1-.- ( -
R=1541 I- 11!_�_ R�3 , �_`,__,N - 1_� -, 4'5"6'7'7'
1 �11
c� `4- - - - - __ __ - - - L-6. --k ____F7 - R-5 �,"F�2_'1_115f 92541�1 I
,�� / R=3,518 16�8 ki
1A I 12' T-..,.,�,.� ��rr�"4�--, I-
��,_ . R-1d5 � K!3�_t���-_-'t . 1
__4____ . 12' 1�-,.,,!,�q n; ;
(3 5"R# =2.5 1,d 4 190 #91 .r, - �� ,
,
r
- , - - ., � I 6.
�, - `-, ��, �
r'.1 - 1+02-7 /�; A�� �, . 43 1 1
Q) Q) I�R R=5.0 C514 ,,-��,�V i�.',', �
��,.�--�-Z,",�ii�,� il-l�r',Sr,j-`-- . 1*0. , -
��IIF I #85 � �� 11 . ,�
.,
412 co C� 4� 03 / R=0.5 1 $= 61-1/ ',� , 2 # ---, .-
13- 1 #92 - ,-�`.`P �`;-""V�'--. �i,,�t-,�'� . -
,�
c- �" ��,�S�'F` � -
8`+2 8 5. R=5.� I 09 " �f;,�,�`�-,, - -
L84 11;6 ,_-;,�'! -_,�,;4,v , r2
I Qi Qe I ;Iq �kl
11 Y, AS-11 / J82 * 1 31 1 / R-L5 R=55 R=f - T-7-9 I I
`
,�, #81 I i,f. �� �i`�,�I�,_��`,,, � ,�;ff,��,','!�, I - �11
R=4.04 2 .-
,
- t� R=5.0 , \
� � 42
it"
(9 y - 7i '.
___� 4 " Ill-6. 1,�'cFl.�
I 7,�;,y,n�-, 7`��i,U-,�,-,,,7�,,�,'
- 17' 12' 5"5°5'4`4" #73 "I I
/ � , ,� , � I r
- � 1
. I
! g=4 R= 1,5 1 - , ."; .� - -_ --,--- ______ - - - -
I
/ 14 13* 10,8, : , , I I
"I -Ij 1 +2, � 11 ., -1 I � I
" . �
/ o 0, R=5 R=50 08 167 / � 1, � A V(
* I 13. R=&O R=2,0 llz� 1, I I :- TlimMA!tl��Iltl: PO E -
�__ 6d Q, CLUSTER W= 0 4;1� 4 -
I 45 lq� , imlowz i�
P8 4 1§0 @ 15' pp N li� , �8 \ (" Ov
I __Isz + �� R-- 1 32" (#72 #69 4- 4 : ,_ � 4 vo, A A
� __,?"
,_�__p_!g ,,,,:� � -
= 11 #74 R-510 R=4,0 � 'b" 1�� +1�1* 'A
/ � =C5 1 I. �
/ � + .1 - - I 1p 25 ' 34 1 rv\ . R: ib- ,?�,Mrl`,41��'._ _�IER�_,_'��`,L_ -11 - .. � 4�* 1
, I , - I __ - - - .. � � -.,-,---,-
13 1 4�; ,qII, - -, _.,. - `t_ - - -
,
1.53� 15 R=3,5 '0� __ __ _ �! ::::: !: I I 1!11 :: �., �. = - � 2 0
" " - -,
� - ! ,, -.5, -,!' ,
I r - -�7 ' � - ' �� '_�-- , '�� � f � " �, - <4 �
_ � ,
JD-10 � ., . �;.,
- - I—— I _. ___w -P-1- IV ,; _____ - - ----.'-- - - -, - ��, C, �'!� -3, -, _�; .
�. 2&0
119 �� ,I 9co
-
_' .�,�L:.-"��.-',,,-ii,-,, -k,�,-11`�i-.-L -
. I— �r .5- ' +3,6 �9 .A+ <61 44 . �.,,r_
L !� 4_ - __ __ - - - - 1 +2' 5ff , .-, . - gl�,.,,,-., ,0_00,,-�� I I
- , �,-,,,g ,
,
- - -- __ -,-,,
,
.
�K4_ 4`= �V"11,_i_�'_,'.��,,_ ',!;.--,.,i,�4`,_,: � ',� "�, � , "P I ;�xl
I- -
, #70 �� �-,,j,�-,_-_., , ,,�,,�', �
IZ- I jl;��',�-�;�j�,',�',' I ro
R=2.5 I 1-111KI, � , - .
.
clo t-4j 1�1 � \___ BROKEN ASPHALT :��l 1 , ,� , I v , ,� giils �
,,:III -, � ,
I �� 1
/ -4 k- I , +19,6 ___11\ , I �o . m 2&I :r�
1:):: I- 0 2.0 1 10 , .
�y Q-1 -4 k I j�
� ( ')
�,_
I ' I . .
4-- - 1 +153 A . R
Ill / cl) - - 0:,, �y I I . - . I . � . .. �j
,
0) 1_1�;, / - -I- I I
z 11� I ,
"
" . ;,� w 28.0
0�- 1�_ __)e +® �
8Q / i,�- / - lz� 6 I � I "._.__,"k,�; �,�'�'�*, -,
, - f-4, -
__ 11 -1 �.�, -
z " 121 � .... .... .. , 1; , V - 11� -
-
_��., ",
, ; _ � I "
�
", ,�,�___, � ,_ " �
_
d ,c 'r +2.0 / i I vo_��2"`__��_ R) 28A ..
R I I I , -, - - . I [ - - - __ - ___ - __ _____ ___ - ___ -
lzz� _._ . . . . . . . . � _�
, .
1.92 , � _ _I , .� t�
, 1, � I . . . . .
,,j - LIj , #32 1 1 -1- L . I- 4ry�* 12�
'Z� JD-9 5�9 +1�11 �wl I
� - �, �7
c-- � 1b �, �,� , "I %_I�%-_!� . . _1 11.1 - - 1%� _. IN
7'7"V4'4' "� -
1 4) 1\ __�� -
+3� I �_ -
�5 " " �, 11�
- +1�11
/ ,� +111 " p 4 - P��
Q) 1�y I 11=05 - �� 1�, �7 - I I -
I .1 _�,
� �.,
IN- / I - - r , 1: �,�
� � ��'
_,� . . -
�
�
I,- @ - /__�_ - - - jLn> - - - - - - - - - __ -ai-I 19 �
0 /�_ , - cj - __ - - - - __ - - -+17.1 - .-
- - - +i 3 13 F, ,"'11-1
4- � 51 ' ," .,,_s_4,a_5
#125 / IPAR6EL FO�JR R=N , � , V�, ," ' f 7.9
v '�._� ,,.-_-_��,
,
1 8. -1 % ;�_, " , t,'� . --- � ' ,
,_ - ,
',_,�_
cy I!,_j 0 Z�_.Xljl�
-7 R=2.5 I I . IV. r_z �1 4T ,
i!"� +1,0 , +15 , �J ARCEL
�> / 25o'l r_ lq� I / 131 F;1. 4",L",.�,,�-�,�"-",�,'t��.,�;-�*�*�.-",� �
� ��0R�Li�,�
- , VI�M . I
1� ' lrl_� - .
0 (Y "I J15#126 / R=2.5 26A6 ' � �,��,��";.i,��',_` -__�,11�,7 1�1�11'P;i --- < I
�__ +01, � ) ; �_
-'!,�
;_,--_, �z R=3,0 I L, - � I I
0, 417�8 � ;.�---�r_�', ��,�-f�Qi�.
04 . 5A _1�c Z�- �; . `1_ � E
05' -0 , "
� t2® Cr - ,-z -_
6S R =3.0 4' z",
?,rl� " " , a�! . . . . . 1�;!;', � ", �
/ . I zl� ,,,,,;-�', I - 14
.., 7
� v � .�
,
I-
�,!;-,���'-`,�,�
I%? 1\
,�,,N;K�_,� - lc\ - ,%�,
-
� N,,- -�-Z, 1% - r� ,�4 :
: �,,
1c) tu"--. %, - ��, 4
cli - I "' - ,�'V-
I CLUSTERS I / � #27 " - �
#25 ' . I
Rt -
.._�L !Z. _ ,,� -
2,98 +7,1 #25 , 7zj � i�',_��7,-"��`�V,� - f� - ___ __ -__ - ----.-- ____ - - ------- ____ -_ -_ I
p 212 _ I --I-
+3,0 _ + - __ 4v __ - -
1
, --I ,
,
,
, 1 �`-
R=N/A4b G; , ,-i�', .�, �c
0.2+ jD_ - - - - - 4 -R= - , I I "'i- �` �Oz�� q.-
- - cd I ,�-, �� z -
- - � � " �! `q
/ L - - - -4 -- - _1417 if � �_ �,, '-Q��,- -`
� ��,, 15, �, I m
0-3 04 .��'R�,' - � 14 ;;
15M
1� / � . . - ,;,� "
12D . . - � �1,1_'13_ffl- �,, ,,V,. � .
r�ll . ' '.
�
I 1 #24 R=kS I. : -p-,
0 j 14" Q� . / � ..
,
1'i".�
- ,,�; ,ri
/ / AR t 14 , `� ; .
+0�8 R=215 29' 1 . �,�� I .
I I +6.0 2Le - .--',7 ," I - -'-- I
-
.,�, ;,.
-
- .;i; -I
(I--, /I .: oN � 1�o _ p
10� #19 I � ,", I �� .
, , , ,`Z�:� ,`�P'e .�
. I . , -
IN. , 11 - �� ,V_', Ld .pi _+ ,
17 I I 0 � " �;'Tl �� �. �,,Tr�, � I �0
I il' . � , _x� b�"-. ��_�-_,,,,�T� �,�,��;K_', . . < - . ..
I I c �:'�,�"'O`,- , � 1� � �-,?,, , m r'!
L 44 JD-6 =5.0 _�_,, �
` �` .
,- / IAl 23 -A . �� 2
�
- , � x
_� - I / t 7.8 1 1 � ,i� � ,�, ,q 1 0 - il .
I ;� ;q 1! � 2,§,,c! , ,�,
7 � 5Q111
- V . .�5-� 0�
�F, 5�'.
1 - �11 pF-lr,-'- 9 . . �
-
co . -1 11`, I - I CL ..
j 122 �,-I�--., �. a.
5'4 4'7' / 21J+ +11� I *,,,"" " � I
c5_1 I \ ,4: , w
_ r, 'd 'n 1�1
,
, ,&, �
EW I @ 6,T9, /15' 5. 12'22'28`� ..' � � %,��!n,, -1 < _2 cic�
121 7- .1 I - 9
1 - Q, le= 6"7'7'4' 1 #127 1 7 114 % , , '.. 11 ��.. - p 1 `
IV R= 1,0 I? '? I D . - 4
- I - -
L 4*5*6'9' 11 , R=1.5 411 1-11 . � - 111P
/ \�- 750� Q 4le X-5 , � a t4l' R-L 11' , 11 I . le 4�\ + + -
_j�y 4_4 ( - cl- - - - - : , ,� - R=3.5 1 V,2L9 lo!'. - IT* . �
, : i � - .
Q� ; i .
, i - T'��, � 1, ,_ �,._,,e_ 2 � 'R
I l�! I - --- ______ - �,y .
Q1 co __4 17 � I I 1 1 0 it =� i -
10-6 !,I 1 0,6+ , , - - I -
1 2.35 24 I I � it 219 1 r,'-,,r" -
'�.,,�,�-'.�--i-�',-,�,,� - --
I ,
1, 1�1+ . . . V14' i�,1113_ - ����4 1.i�
� u7I JD-4 R / R I ,� .� pl " �, : 1
,�CO ,,� -
/ / , -111, t'. I
d 17 . !I�l-l�-"�7i�,��,,�,i�-�l-1 �,P�r��_"`__I�q, �1 pi�n_
cz� czi 16, , ��`� I , 1�1 11 - n " �, . .
I 1 J128 R-3. (i.�,',, 1
+14 / 'S's 13, 1 "',!�� 11A . .6
I �_
(@ 0 1 R-3 5 25' �11 , - t,�.-ht" "'��:�,gs��"r . �
I z 11 - " - I
- / 1� +4�O t . 1) . ,11 � /
/ 61.4 __�&i , - +21.7 < �,-,,��,�-�--�,�,,�,,�7"�-�*..',!,�L"�y .,
r 24 1 � g,
, , I R:', V �k"�
1 2,88 �t 1 03 1 f�,..-;��g�-".",��-,,,,�,R�,,, 1
10-3 / i 6.3 � / 0 23, � ... _zl'riP " , - 4 � I
_K "I'll ,�',�-__,
"
-
I 01 - -
� �
� ,
,,, . � 4
1 ` I -�K z'g 20.1
c4 1 - +19.2 . I - � ,,I Ll /
/ fc-1 �,-,.,q','%V.' -...j 0 I4
_�, 43 1 '�� 11 il '1 , 28.1 C�
f-, ,�� / , _/ � 1�,� !i�7*16,� -
�
�.;, _,��4_111�_, 6
�i / I I lw_ " N Q, . !-, : ��A +0y -
...
<4- � Z9 1 , � Yj I ,,� �E-
'�' -
�_,�
_-
+u 3,01 � + & �!��-",.- � 41�-vi
. � � , �; �,'2..
jo-2 q�u ; �!��', '10 ,�:
. .,
- _ "
.). "2 4�1
/ 6.6+� 1 1 / g 1.0�1.` �� -
I
,�,r - 'Ili'. - j-_4 4V '17.92 .
,-
It -,_�-,r'..., �,-ik�j, � +,�) 1�� - ,� (. -i 41. I
I 1� +11�1 411 b
11 111 111P -1 I m
� 1'1111�1_1 1 4.-t 2LU-
, -
- .
�
-I.- __�, 0 Mi�,EW',!�!:�Y - -
T,t`��-IRR`!:-�` I n � .
I +16,8 i 1\ :1 r7 - . .-
� / . � --�,l ,iM- - -
. �.
�,, 9i I
� � � I 0* � - PARCEL TWO
- �
��
co cl) . 1--_r',1,1r.,-,.1�
,
13* 1 - , !,
,,�1_11, -
ae / / 14 / �'271 - `,.;%, ,- ,If_`�,� .
c� �y +4A 6.1 . I � ,
16 . ,�i
" � , o
4 lq� ,. -� k'u_.�,
lz� I I
I 1�� ;�.;'*,, iWR;,'�'42"t -, - 4� I
_ - (:�
I A5 Z91 � 6-10- - I '. ,�'�i'�-�`�,',��`, -I' �' N 411
" k ,?-, .
W��""
26. � -�� �_ -g-l't
/ jD_ I I ", � , A +If,, ,�, + � +
12� / . . . . . --. 1 �,T_*�y - 11b.
"...
,
,
,
10 6` � ul , 1 13' 22' 23.4 22, 0 � - ;7 , - r 1, � ' -'�",7,�,*u +IV � V- ,�,
0.92 1 I 6. 6' 12"24'1 4' 14 j 0 ___ . _-_- 7,1 �
_ 1-
.;'
- -
: i ====9 " - -1 - 's
,38 139JD L1 4� _ 11, __+_p - - -
,
- -*23.04 p 2617 �� + (1)
; , I - - �
- - __ __ _+ __ - . - 5'5'4!'4' 5.77» � I , R) t 5; ' _ . . . � _ :W , __ - - - - - _..
630,00' 4,40
-
'2� f 0 11 .... _ 23,05 cct ' ' t��;, , I 41� I
c�a 019 7 5' 26L . / __ ' . ' L� � ,.Vo IT, - .98 I .
4 ', r4'7� 23' 26�yj,�,,, � , ,. � - �. - _4 �
), .- _Yqmr�l � ,;r,
/ z: A 15, � 60 @ �-, V� �-,,,
- - (R) ----@ - - - -- Z,2- - 24 12.. 24,2Q_ - - , �_r_--,��?,-,,-,' .
� / __�_ - - - - - 4- � , - �_ __ r, ,,,, 0 � � 11� w
ITO / � _ - - 25,94 � .. �. /_��10 , - - _��,.! " * �-' - , � .
___w - , , _'-� *,,� - ,� -_, - - - _® -
282.41 4, , '... . ,12p _,,�
/ , . , r7 2'i!-N,�,--,,`�,-��_`� , � - li� M ... I ...... 171.1� - __ - -
-
--- --�'� -"'r� ,_N'11
24,37 �.�f- ;� , ji-hi- - Jl'& I 11 '?
, ,
,
/ 2r, QR '\,�- "', - _W��a
/ ,-- ",,p -- _,!�,,j5-,, -, - -,
z �,, " i_"Y'Z - _ 7_ ,
. ,-',-�-1,�.)":,-��--,��-Z--.?��,,,,�7.,,�,-,�."-����,�- IZ,..-,'�:�-�f""l-"e.,�'I'�LZI, , �-�-�, � i-� i;_� �, ��-. �
, ,
- , - +
27' � ". - I
, , �� '��.�_-,�11_-,�,',`,,'! e U,
. , .,,__ ; 4 �i
, _` "I , �_., `1� , > i
.�
N / to' . -k �� _', � 1�, ,--",*���-,i��---�,114�?"-i�-z-�,�',�K', - , , . RIM EL A 26�33
-
� , 6A 1 IV . R ',� � I 7 p _§,1!--':--`,p'�,,,, W t, N, � , - - . Y, �% , - . NITAR ( MANHOLE
/ I � � _g - zp2 'i - 4f- - wF,m ` ,c,V N�_ -§)
I 4R I
�j " ! , I
2"" � � zi lga-� R� "NF Li� 1,
�
� __ ,� " -
-
, � , - , " ,�
-9 - I . ,,.��__ �,
-I L_ � , @ c� I � �
C, � 2229 - , SA � 3135, "75
.
� ,�,�� -
, - i_ �
3k R
� , , 0� ,
R
�
/ +5.1 / � 11 - - " - 2 . . . . . .j �� \
1� ,_ A, - r I k1l N IE = 22.87 �
- 1> -
� , '.- �;, *,5" %
t'��,� � � ,- - -
-,-�,, 1� i �', � " � -,
t ",*,`�-,(`_ _� �, " ,
� -
I I . I w - - , I . , - J,� ,�.;,; __ S IE = a2.89 3t,27 ' -
, ��. ��;,
1 15,6 - SANITARY MANHOLE --�;"'.`,�` , 7 y�Y,� ,-, .� t� . I 1 4
- � - i ,-;,-��,�,; ". I �
.. . , -, �_,', �-; ','.'i 4 ,, ��_
, �� - �,i�,P��-��-6V,�--; -,�Ii,4_
,��.,,t,-�,,��-,%,,�;.,;�"i'�.'�,,,.-� �'i.t,!�,,�'�:,�,._r co
R", I I a/
RIM EL = 25.82 � ,,,x,-,- ;-!41' -, - ;-__!��",i,i"�..-r� .4 SW IE = 2105 \ I 4 , ..
- / 23 - � - ��-p",y"n'u,--g -, - - IN IE = 103 a'
NE IE = 23,03 � P'�.i4,�'-��t-�'i'����'It�""I�'�,,�� _ ,,, _. �_-�, �_ 11 6*6 910'8* ,
- _ 11-11, 11"'. � _ � � 1 ,
Qe I / T 1_.!�P -:�t �
S BE = 2M5 //, �9 4-
1 ,_,�4*L�!,�.F-.� _�,-_!' - � 1.
,FF.: _ 31,38
+u SW E = 23.54 1� 11 .,- 5- 0 __� - - - - - - - - - E
2" 4
I --, �, . " z,!P�_-�-,�,�-� .; �. � \�_ - _17
,� ��
. , ,, "a r :
. ,1-1,1 111-
111?� / I � NW IE = 23,39 A ".." 11 PARCEL FOUR ' 1:z� 1- 3u3,
- :1� ,,� "�4'
/ cli / Tj�5 / +10 6_r4l,_ - - 1 4 V� � > o -� � I
@ 13 6�,, - '9N L -
- - - - - - - / - - - - - - _ .,._,2"�", " 0
.
lz� - - - +0 1 ; 11
`� ,12
�-:,,,�,,�,�;.�, -
5.0 + � I� ... 1 42' ". _ , , - V I I I
/ 1 .52 � ,��,`�,--'.�3�,,A e�
,
,
,
,
- 12'
.�
/ / 11, �
11
,
1:�j
..
,�_
d , �
" `,"� -
I / � T , - ,
. --A, - -------- �_ " i 113 -
15. ,A/ _. +1%;V -i
� �111 A `� , ��,'������:-,�,.'�,,�',�,'�",��.�-"�,:� -1 , 26® .� ,
"
j � In+ � �
10, -� 7,0 . - - -,--,--- ,� 10' I I 1�11 �
/ / IV13, 17.4 " (9) g! 4 ,,,.�,,� �,,,_: I (9) 1�11
; � � 11
, � I . 27.21 -,
630roL)' @ / , z ,�_ � 30�q 2-
A A 7,21 / 27.1 : 1`:
.... �_ _ &37 1 � , '; .� ; �;;a-
� I
.
�-,
- - - - - - _ a, . - ". � . .11, 8.25 � � � 11. �,, `�,�e - 11 - - :4 28.1
+ , � . )0-5 16.� . k : I i I I
/ � / I /,q. 19. , / I
, -
11-11
/ . 1'1:_I�i , / Q 0
ZONE VE 10* 27' 14' _ �, I �
21.91 - (R) 93 _ b1K
�25 �� �f. - 'N ,%,, 1 WE --r- _- I .�
(EI 15) PUILDING P=z.-"? I I �
. � , 911� __�:�� '
/ 14�86' , _ ,1117�-,k,M . .21152. ' -- 2�,13/-INI�iHED FLOOR zMz 2a.E a - .
FF, ELEV=11.1 810 8,86 4=84 -1 1� 7 3: 3 2 .18 2 '.41 . 25�5 25 49 lzl! 11��O�,,,�, r,�.�r� , N � ,
I - 18.01 - , = 2 .1 - � .
9 4 02 7-VCFF �' ,,,j.,.,,,.',, "3i ,�6 ®„ --: / 0
/TOP OF BLDG, ELEV=76.5 A 18,54 / 20�47 ZD-j �.. _. 1, 11 � F_', , - � ,,-,� I
ED IB 9-85 1418- / I �,� . / I I
`��,_ ,,�,,76iA� - �4-' n
�0, ..., 1:� . I I
� ��"_; Im cq
':
j,,�� �n-M-;
I '�"'11 4 � �
IE - 0.95 1 /. IL95 / C T - ��_,�_ $; r , I / +2&2 1 .
�� � -�� � ". �Ii_, �
�, �V,' �[Ir
�, �? �� -
, ,
iry ,r �?� . X, WO D
11 "
�, , �, - I .�,rO.
� -� ..
I I , _14 - ... 26�24 6.19 SH D 0 %
""r �U
19�34 , w,"', - %
i,7,j; , .- .�
I ,1. V `_ � I !,-
, A �
A 13.1? / 20� 55 overhang 2 21 1 ,�'�.,�;-,3��,,,�,', 1 1 - - �
8' CLAY a 5 l%Qw1BH3 - � -_ , 75i_ - ",----,- __ n
`L09 :10 8114), 19- -7 Ty 3 20,42 0,6 .g,62-- - - - � . - _", - - ___1_1
20.4 20,60 1 5 I z,�,�, ,,.S�� � X _!.�* +�4 ,
- .5B-, -, -_,-�,:- - , -,,,�tlF7',,�j',`��;� - - - - - 1�11 1
1 � T,�', _-, �,g "
�fF,f , - ,,v�`,' �1,1� '47"7'7'4'
,*�
. MR - 25,07 "-" L - , , , '.."', � , g �, , 61 �
YARD INUE' ' r,oi I � _;;, 2 1!:
RE -� , '.
" _
,_,: "'�Ii_�, � - '_'IVI�11'91[
I I _�,� � -
,� % ,�_.,"�,`�-..,�,-�..;,111 �_�,�5,e',,,�',�,,l ...
1; . , "� - 'S'�*w-� ��
/ T","� 02-,�, - &9 - - II I .)
a C09 YE 34 -,- lam 1 " ' , ,��_ - -1-11'. - � SAM ARY MANHOLE 0 i
, _� '_ �"`� `- �7, F I M EL =
4,0 � +19�02 ZONE 21.24 +2112 "_ r�,�"'11__,Tl `01_� , ,�l I
+ . 2 .- 18 1 1 +24,85 �'� "�'��`� �*,"� �� , �� ',,-.'!'-,m��, , �
iT-', ,�,�,,,,,-,-,",'-,�
, , .
3.6 4,6 +9,9 8,6=. 10.3 . shadJ I N IE = 22,1B +27�O 301 0 .
,,1`1 2D.2 � ' I
,- 4 -�-�I�rs Z S IE = 2Z97 +27,8 3-3-5-6- 3 �
15,86-, !,- / ,,,..,��i�4.1-1,;Y . � :: , ,f, , � �. I
_'.,n"
- * - �'1111' - I
� [`,�,- ` �,;
/ s" I I
"�'r�,` i� -,mk _!'�
� � n' '
� -, �,,,,,�
,. ,,�.5 12, W IE = 24.02
� k"
,.,:� .,,,,�."".,,,,
� �� -
/ 1 251 , -* , ,",,-_�'k�`,, ]:,R� _ >
I , �,F�� .
. . _,
3 . .. , L�i�llj�l� _�� -, -1
Li 25. .� ,�Iz,?,��,F F 305
� , I ,- Ax " ��",,,�, <
. ,
/ -L� _"I � q 17�
,! � r� ", 4� 4 2 �2'9, i
�! "Ir-1 A
I - -� -1 L�.j, � .
�,11;1 " 11,
� p;l �`,_U� �2 --i ., 1,'*'-11; � A,!,��,5 , -
. lwl .�, ., , -,-,���f--"-j,---"!..".i.�, � I I I ,,��, + 1:� I
, - ,-,., -��
i�l V / < i�_�I-Z,�,�., �� . ,�, ��%f -, -,u_�,.",.
,
I _� ��i , , "� - ',
3 i -'?' I , -�,�N'6-_, -1,_-6 -, ,7-,,,
, w I 1-11-1, .-"-- , +1�1_ .
" ; ,_ - -�,, ,,g 1: ., 0
-, �� , � � , +281
_j - ,"','���,:"���.,,'���,,�, � .., , . I
.r!_ �,�_� _: �
, -, , - , �� .
"Ir '�;, `i�;__�-',�'.�,,,,`j, +253 14' 9� 2f
,",�'�'��,l,'�,�-";,,i��.��,��.� e��it""--rl,,.,�'-"�,�,�","t,'�,�i,��.�', `�_"13�1'1_
_ - I-- -, 14 ir
I I - z ZONE X .��',,',��,.�,�,,�,�,,�l,'��!f""��",,, "" 2 x6i GRATE INLET - ,
I �',',�,4'N!,im_l _j .
><I C) Q?0 . -
/w , " ��, , - , ,rY`--,,---,-,,- `,, `�.' GE = 30.29 �
I 0 N ,_� "-7`�i'_'I'� -,,Qr,, _,,' .,_,
"-",.����,.,,,,�.:��-7��,,,---�l.,'�,.� , R)
- �', Sir RM MANHOLE
z ZONE VE �� �--,��,;�,?�,�,,�,',,-';�����.�,,7�I L 9 I I .
>< / ct: ��-,��'�'�..-�,-",,'�,�����_;�,��,4�"",�,�", i-i". I . -- �_.�._N_;�� ,�,��'�l-"�-7-,;���,�"Ila7���,,�- . 14" N IE = 27.7 41.74 � "
0.0 (EI 14) CL. Q , I ; . � I I r " �,Z f 6 5,�-'F��5?""';�Z4�t "" 4' Q� RIM = 26J6 1 1 BE IE - 27�79 0 - -4
. n () 'r,F�5?,`;�Z42--- �'5' N IE = 19�34 - - --+290 - Y T9_3 - T--12'-12-
Of \4 1 " _ we z ! 29.2
., '. �1�z�.Ivr��4 -.�� ,TO
8 <10 RI �- �) , z-.-"�.,��.�t�-������.,���,- , E :j : 11.45 (66- RCP) (9) I 11 2813 It, . � (
Q IS, : �': . f!ii-,T_ � -* 28A
" � _� ,q .7-27.9- - - I'277,T_ - I ..
Ic " -21,�__,(, 1 1 !, 9
1�c 0 / .If f�' _11,RP1 "' - _� E 9.88 (42" RCP) 24' 14' l59:1.-74 - - - -
_
- . - �,_, ,A----M,-�Q__., � '� r
- -�_ - 5
, -1.1. 11 I- 1- n � 274
1 n. � - ,;"�� W I - &52 0
_j �Z. 1: , - ,�Ti�r,�V,:__117 -
- @) @)
P. I ,�. 41 e
L�_ t �:__ . � � I � 29,5t3l%7� ' +275 _j 31.6-- ,
�
- , 11 .�� -
- " - . ,�� �, i�" �o
- I � .1 1� r i�,r�'L'1,11"�� �, +27�O +27.4 = .
,- * -
!,�' ��4 , 11 - �1�_ 6
1 - 11 _Q� 1 � I I ,.- i��_"� 25.80 ,ep 9: v 'I I
, 819 +27,8 +
23 1 " , _ 2Z2 4 d. 28.1 1
� �,,_,� -" 6. 7,2 28,2
,��
14' 1 1 �
. - :
IN , �; 5 9- 2582 1 1 * 'L. 19. 1 f- - - - '_ - -'I- 7! -34-6- - - 1 3113
� , 0 ----f-
eq r, ,. ' @) 3Q.57 - - � 2 13 284
, 54 1", 5. 28 ' � @
STORM MANHOLE , - @� 41b3- - 31�,j
\ 2�4 . ,_1 �2�3 +3 .
I RIM EL = 25�03 24.34 O`�4
_� o. " 079 - � .-
N m al � " 0 31 ,
I I I I E IE = 8,80 1 _,�,,,,,, I 2. :_ I -I---- 111 I f
, "', �, ;_
- \ 5 IE = 19,21 2fi . �,�,-,N- . - - I _7!.86 . 28.65 -_ x,; " !" -� - 9q IR 29.65 O.. 2
� I I � W IE - 8,79 �'�Z40&,- - � __�;.-q-�%-,�"- _1� , -, t I _r, 1. , - _T 1-1 , 'm" .- 4 _ I ��, 'v
r "'.1111 �, .. ;; -.1 , I ��� 1, - ,
�,` , � ,:. , � - ��, 1, �eli 11-1 �_ .;? 1 �.r
I - � ,�,!:,�-,9"4;�-��1--��.,,-.���.,�l- 'c I � ,:_�f ,, ; , r �11
, - UP (, r " -'-"
� ,�,�i,,
- , "", �
�- ,01,' . ��_11_�� .� I , -- ., � ,��, u �,, ,� 4 �,, r� "'111'� -- ,", 1-�
. T� kT��11:� ; 1, � --i .g ��g -_ , - --. .t -1-
:y�
I . _7�� , I ,� , - " _ ,� - 1,
I , �- ��, -, , �_ �m -,
I � - , �- � , - , , �-Z- �g � �t V�-,'� -,�r��-',�'RgEq,!F - `z -'��`�'.'19'1�
� - . . - - -, , - �
- - � -p- .1" -4;!_ ,"
I 411's�? " - "" �,;w !III `�,� ,;.", It .L _��
, " I _rt
0 1 " - I i�i� - � ,�,� ., , A ,
S - - ___ - I �1� 1� .5, Ekmw�ql i'�, ,".-7, �
.1-3 �, r ",-.-��Frr�l�,`,- ',_'7�� ,,,,, .1 _11' - ,
, Ri .-,", �,,J_, ,,,,, � E
. ��' ,,,,' r 11 I -IA _ -1- .--lb" I.. ,-W.
.,� 7.. �".'�iltR�4`�� - -1 , _`1 - I - , , - - - f, .-I 'I
� - � _�'_ ,� _ _:"�,L� - , '� ,,��-_, --' �1'
I 'I' , �, 7- _g a
, 1, . li- _Ii!.`�`f ."-, - -
, ,�_,� _�
% ,
o _' 'i' _ �,� 1111111 __ - , " --, -�'�, .,.� .
- - - - -Ig �p N S. �',-,�,'�J,-,',-.-'-��ii " �7,-�,�--__AF,'-#�t;,94 t g ---�' _- ,
- , -- - - -- �,�-,gy;- ,� �: � � " '007-, __U
- ff4 i4 1 31-, ,� I I
- A "j , J " " _ - "�-_�� -,-
I I I (: �_ 17- ",,L! �'mi7 ., _1 i V1.1 __,", -,
1�,,�,,Pfj - a,r--pt9_A,, �,,- %, ,�
" .T,��i, _,,' ., �,�_�,_ ;�e -�,�vq,_ _, .7 �.. -
a ?11.1 ,� - , � , s T I - , , - ,�,, - -, ", , LE ,
�_ �, -,q,-",-,.-�,,�,,,-,,,�-,�,,,-- ,, - _L� - -- " � �, _ ,,N`-�!.���'.,'��n ,�`;` ,�� � -
i& LA�, T_ -
,, �, 511 � JwZ�-N, ,,�,% 02-�I.�,,--�-,'t_ W,A,,��,-�,- ,,
� - - �11.. . , q I , -�_,';,K _1�5,4�6 2_�,,� -g-�,,�7'.,!,- N,'�Rut-��,4,�,
, , A � , � _�, r-
- =-, '.�'_ '_ ' ' , � , - -, - ".�' �10_rwll C , - , � _yf,;,;,�'t, I
w � �.; � �
- - . , " "I - " '�_, ,��r __`11y1'_'1_ -1 , '. _� ;
. I ,L- ;_�_-.� � ' _' .- t-IM " - - - -�- , - , , , M�,, 5�43�,�,�',�' a: � - , 1 . R
,� -.-r
, , �, � �', �'
, - -
R� ;,�_�,�Kri� I- -, IN- _�,.N:��,N�'.,,M,�0�,"_, __ - Irl S��-�, _T�f�,� _J,�,__, _�I� -, f� � -, � - " 11 %� .1 -, __`__'� I - Z,,� 1.- �.. - -,.�, _ . , � ., -
_�, �,, . -__� ��_, Mi� -1 I ... 1� I ,--- - " � y
__ �,_�7",�-,�� � ,5_,_1.71z1 ;1,1 ; ,��""I"�""-.�,,,,.,�-,.�7,-,.���,,���,,� , g, ,�,il��,�--til.",�w-,,-B,-,Vu�v�- ',,3,�,�,r
� *�7�r�.ii..�,",,,,,�5�,,���L,---,,,-,r,-, Aii-, rw , ,_� , ,", , , -, " - ��,r _ , �1�1 - , - , , - .--,,� � , ,��4,,_,;-,�-,, -��12,'
I __. -Z , 4 __ - ,,; - A - � , ,��,,-��
- _ W."'. - - - , 1. , , -- - . - -ti
.
-x iq�,.-,j �,�'. r. _,tn ".'m I , . _ , . , - - ;7-; ,� - ` 'y ;0� F, - 11
__ Zir 1111�#Iqj ft __z�t,z-�-, -��;14'�i�� , p�t��n-,- � 't, .-, , 11 - � -�&,��,-.I,i,5�7 �� _ ���, • - , 1 ,I -
-
, I --I J�W!)��;' ��.'r�,��` ,,, m . !-, - - ft-jg ( , wl �.�i�,,,'�,,�,�-.�,��,-,,i��,�'-,, ,'��71 ��,�!:�'---, _. 1. "_,Z . , " I
.
agz��, -,;-',-�---,� � K -, q N,%�, " �,,�i -, -�','� �T.`�,�,',-� J',=-�,�j�- ',-,,, 7 I "' , " -�!!�'�'�,- ;L-�'�,�L',, I
*7� � �,
�
'21, � �� - I., `
�
- , - �- _�, -
, -
-
, :=�_�" -y""J., lit'-f."', �-__-�-��!,.,��-,� - - - - �m�_, ,�_!, .; ;,
,,� , - � -, , - - . _3_� -, 1. , , ,� � ,
.
- ` . I , �� , - -
� -f ,� �
,
� / I � " i__1RA_ T " I -4- . , , , N ml�p_ -
�� � , __ Z, .; _. �_
� 7_ -
� , _. � . Y' , _,, - W� _1�1_1 4 lt,i�,
-11 � *2 ,\ , " - - �.r -- _ , " - , _,__ . .-I - tT��
M4 -A ,J- 0, ,�,� �11, - _,n- -Y fimr" ,_ ,-,�. 7,-�t�, , . r __ - 211, 11-11" "N .��'.,
- �jq,� - I� �j -�,�,'tT��5-__�,j',', _� 6!�R��_ ,_ ... 7"�fv 11 I �__11� �;��,'Z_k___ �, �_ z EM-PR 0. - -0--alk'Alli, "'e"k u- � . I- i
A 11
19 - "' .,; It -",,. _ _ -, .. �� 7, . ,'V,�' 5,'� " �`��,,� m .,,--� ,,, ,
3 i - �,�,.���;�-�,:��r--,�i,-�,,,--.--,--,,��-� ,��,U!
24 I....
04 , i L - __ ,� � rr-" � r I 11 i � � " -,, � �L, ",
.
2 1 3 REVISED PARCEL 3 DESCRIPTION 211 , �� S. fl " �_ .� " _.._---- ____ - % -_
I / Fk11hgf -�t�s ,�','zq - �� i , .%T �7;,27_ Z/ 40, - . � - - i ri . � . 4 , � � - , x . I ---" . I'll, �� I, I
JOD .. 6 � . �L � """!
- ��,
,
4 • - - I "'! 'i
e� 1, , - � ..1-1 I � SANITARY �
- - fg-"-,�,�,�,T,V.i�-��,�*-�'�;�2Z� - �' . � )l - , a, I � -,,,.
, � - 1AII , - __ , 110 � . . W�T ��_ "a � I I �, 2.9,6 p � . ,� , I
" . __ ,, - - *�� . 1. .,
� � -
C11 � � - , - - - � 71 - .
-
- �
, �, M 7,�
m 08/21/06 2 ADDED SOUTH 24' PARCEL JOD . ,�49! -, - 1 1 .43 12" PVC � 'al
,� T65 _mT 29.97
m ��:.��S` g,,�NLL Mim, AJTR�,�-, .R "
I - - .�.,i-'. 1, - � - `
� ,
'� � .I.! r If M , r .
, Xv I ..
ff
"
.1 P - � �. �
,a JOD / / �� , '. ,*L �,v"u',,,��,, ,.,SI;E- ,: � . 27.64 3062
�
I POST-DEMOLITION TOPO CATCH BASIN _ , . c N
'��_ � , �� 7, 11 I � 1V CATCH BASIN 79
i , " � - I .
- - - RIM EL = 25.79 I 4�;,_;R`,�_'�_',.'� , _ , - �,
I �,!� i "', � ,,V�� 1. �'
. ,
. ,
. , c'.
,
,
A � . , , , , 1, .. I I RIM EL = 25.138
N IE - 20.55 ��_,f,�,�,. I I I �1, . -
�-'I-gtq�,'�b I - .. i, ,
�:, ,
m ii ;;�; - - - L ,- j� , NE IE = 2131
:; - E IE = 21.59 � I ��� r � � � ---- n__ , , .. 1; LL -
16� � � . i i . .! i ; ���� � - _ - - - - � SE
9 r
:4
I
I .
� .
1> I
A/C =
AIR CONDITIONER UNIT
M = BACKFLOW PREVENTER
_.'
BLDG =
BUILDING
6 = BOLLARD or POST
,
"z
(C) =
CALCULATED DATA
KE =BOX, CABLE TELEVISION
� -
t--;t; .
CCR =
CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD
EM = BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY
R .,
CLF =
CHAIN LINK FENCE
g] = BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY (TRANSFORMER)
� ,
I.,
I
CMP =
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
03D =BOX, TELEPHONE
1.
I
CONC =
CDR =
CONCRETE
CORNER
A = DECORATIVE LIGHT POLE
-1 - =
CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK
i
=
CURB TIE
G- = FLAGPOLE
.
bi
I Iq
%T
D
D) =
DEED DATA
ION
+1 ;;;
DB =
DEED BOOK
[M = GRATE INLET
.� A-
• x
DIP =
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
LIGHT
_z
�n
. A
ECMP =
ELLIPTICAL CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
=GUY ANCHOR
rt
t
EL =
ELEVATION
* = LIGHT POLE, CONCRETE
1 , ,
4
I
�
EP =
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
* = LIGHT POLE, METAL
n p
.
ERCP =
ELLIPTICAL REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
* = LIGHT POLE, WOOD
W. W �
. ;;
I
(F) =
FCM =
FIELD DATA
FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT
NE = MAILBOX
. I A
FOOT =
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(D = MANHOLE, ELECTRIC
I
. , w
FIR =
FOUND IRON ROD
GQ = MANHOLE, E TRAP
•,J
-
FND =
FOUND NAIL & DISC
ARY SEWER
-
j .4 -
I _.,
FOP =
FOUND OPEN PIPE
o = MANHOLE, STORM SEWER
FPP =
FOUND PINCHED PIPE
a) = MANHOLE, TELEPHONE
+. 1.
FRRS =
FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE
EM = METER, ELECTRIC
I
F/T =
TIE
FENCE TIE
[m = METER, GAS
1.
FXC =
FOUND X-CUT
RM = METER, RECLAIMED WATER
11
GE =
GRATE ELEVATION
[E] = METER, WATER
g
IE =
INVERT ELEVATION
Iw
(L) =
LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATA
C�g = MITERED END SECTION
I .
LB =
LICENSED BUSINESS I
@ = MONITORING WELL
. _. .
LS =
LICENSED SURVEYOR
IN = PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNAL
MAS =
MASONRY
0 = SANITARY CLEANOUT
°1 .
. 1..
�
MHW =
MEAN HIGH WATER
0 = SCHEDULE B-2 ITEM
I
. ,
�t -_2-
NP =
NORMAL POOL
@ = TELEPHONE RISER
I
t �
O/A =
OVERALL
, = TRAFFIC SIGN
TA I
�1-:-. ;I -
OR =
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
no = TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX
�� .
't .,�
(P) =
PLAT DATA
@ = TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE
"
`� -
4
_
PB =
PC =
PLAT BOOK I
PAGE
CABLE TELEVISION MARKER
_
-
PLS =
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
CABLE TELEVISION WARNING SIGN
'r`
;�!Fl
POB =
POINT OF BEGINNING
m = UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC MARKER
. 1.
POO =
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
M] = UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WARNING SIGN
.1
PRM =
PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT
FIBER OPTIC MARKER
"_a
�
PSM =
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER
LLwjs = UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC WARNING SIGN
,7 , -:
?.?_11).,;
P/T =
PAVEMENT
RCEMAIN MARKER
1+,
�
-
PVC =
POLY VINYL CHLORIDE
RCEMAIN WARNING SIGN
7 m
17
I
--24CP =
REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
=UNDERGROUND GAS MARKER
I
n
,
RLS =
REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
WARNING SIGN
2
R/W =
RIGHT-OF-WAY .
RECLAIMED WATER MARKER
SEC =
SECTION
.
SHW =
SEASONAL HIGH WATER
CLAIMED WATER WARNING SIGN
SIR =
SET IRON ROD 1/2- LB 6113
NITARY SEWER MARKER
SND =
SET NAIL & DISC LB 6113
NITARY SEWER WARNING SIGN
,
!Z?
SR =
STATE ROAD
I In 1�
.
I
S/T =
SIDEWALK TIE
M] = UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WARNING SIGN
- '
STY =
STORY
0 = UNDERGROUND WATER MARKER
�
;; -
1q,
I
SW =
SIDEWALK
TER WARNING SIGN
I�
.. �
TBM =
TEMPORARY BENCH MARK
o =UTILITY POLE, CONCRETE
-
,
IF *
I
(TYP) =
VCP =
TYPICAL
VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE
-0 _> = UTILITY POLE, METAL
-
n .
W/ =
WITH
= UTILITY POLE, WOOD
+
. -
":
WF =
WOOD FENCE
Gv Doo =VALVE, GAS
I
W/T =
WALL TIE
RV PQQ = VALVE, RECLAIMED WATER
FEE
X
# =
TREE NUMBER
sv m = VALVE, SANITARY
.
�
R =
TREE RATING
wv Do,a = VALVE, WATER
,
*
-
= WELL
- -
+ 25.25
= POINT OF ELEVATION
4�
25,2'
r,-\
��
= DIMENSION FROM BUILDING TO = ITEM NUMBER IN SCHEDULE B-2 OF TITLE COMMITMENT
m_;�
.,! u �
-,
�
BOUNDARY / RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
.�
.. In
p
-
I
1p
+
= POST DEMOLITION ELEVATION
a d =CONCRETE
i,
� = ASPHALT
I -
INLETS
MM = CONCRETE PAVERS
E OP
I E
.�E2 = BRICK
ff=-i
I
, I
_z�
,A ,�ss_ c::::i;3 c=:;;::-_n
= TOP OF BANK
- .
4 ! '
= TOE OF SLOPE or CENTER LINE
OF DITCH
I
. 2
- 11 -
X_ ______y_ = 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
= OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES
- -G -
- --G- - = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND GAS LINE
E
LO
- -W -
- ---IN- - = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER LINE
19
- --I- -- - --F- -- = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN
I
® -R - - -R®- =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER LINE
- ,
�
- - 42'!-PV6 - - - = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER LINE
: I.'
. •
- 24!LR0fL- --- = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER LINE
%• 4
, 9:, .
-
I .
- I
,
I .
I
,
I
I
. -
I ,
, 11
PROJECT:
.
.
.
TYPE OF SURVEY,
I I
.
.
I.. "
GRAPHIC
PREPARED FOR:
TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, LLC
, , �
"
-1
-1
1,
�,
-
ASSOCIATES J C.
_jL_pQ&&Rfl0
7Z5,0V(Q
SECTION y TOWNSHIP ., RANGE 15 E.y
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
30 15 0
30
A/C =
AIR CONDITIONER UNIT
BLDG =
SOAL:1 " =30' !
03 = BACKFLOW PRE TER
(C) =
CALCULATED DATA
= BOLLARD or POST
CCR =
/eB
= BOX, CABLE EVISION
CLF =
CHAIN LINK FENCE
M = BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY
CMP =
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
= BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY (TRANSFORMER)
CONC =
CONCRETE
= BOX, TELEPHONE
COR =
CPB =
CORNER
CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK
= DECORATIVE LIGHT POLE
= FIRE HYDRANT
C T =
D) =
CURB TIE
DEED DATA
= FLAGPOLE
DB =
DEED BOOK
= FLARED END SECTION
DIP =
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
= GRATE INLET
ECMP =
ELLIPTICAL CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
= GROUND LIGHT
EL =
ELEVATON
e- = GUY ANCHOR
gF
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
= LIGHT POLE, CONCRETE
ERCP =
ELLIPTICAL REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
= LIGHT POLE, METAL
(F) =
FIELD DATA
= LIGHT POLE® WOOD
FCM =
FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT
= MAILBOX
FOOT =
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FIR =
FOUND IRON ROD
= MANHOLE, ELECTRIC
FND =
FOUND NAIL do DISC
Q = MANHOLE, GREASE TRAP
FOP =
FOUND OPEN PIPE
Q = MANHOLE, SANITARY SEWER
FPP =
FOUND PINCHED PIPE
= MANHOLE, STORM SEWER
FRRS =
FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE
= MANHOLE, TELEPHONE
F/T =
FENCE TIE
= METER, ELECTRIC
FXC =
FOUND X ®CUT
= METER, GAS
GE =
GRATE ELEVATION
= METER, RECLAIMED WATER
IE =
INVERT ELEVATION
= METER, WATER
(L) =
LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATA
= MITERED END SECTION
LB =
LS =
LICENSED BUSINESS
LICENSED SURVEYOR
= MONITORING WELL
CL
MASONRY
= PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNAL
MHW =
MEAN HIGH WATER
= SANITARY CLEAN OUT
NP =
NORMAL PODL
0 = SCHEDULE B -2 ITEM
cca°
OVERALL
= TELEPHONE RISER
OR =
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
-®- = TRAFFIC SIGN
(P) =
PLAT DATA
= TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX
co
PLAT BOOK
q..
PG =
PAGE
= UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION MARKER
PLS =
POB =
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
POINT OF BEGINNING
= UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION WARNING SIGN'
POC =
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
= UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC MARKER
PRM =
PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT
=
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WARNING SIGN
PSM =
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER
= UNDERGROUND FIBER OP11C MARKER
P/T =
PAVEMENT TIE
= UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC WARNING SIGN
PVC =
POLY VINYL CHLORIDE
t
2,50y
REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
= UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN WARNING SIGN
RLS =
REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
= UNDERGROUND GAS MARKER
R/W =
RIGHT-OF-WAY
= UNDERGROUND GAS WARNING SIGN
SEC =
SECTION
= UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER MARKER
SHW =
SIR =
SEASONAL HIGH WATER
SET IRON ROD 1/2" LB 6113
If
SND =
SET NAIL & DISC LB 6113
= UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER MARKER
SR =
STATE ROAD
= UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER WARNING SIGN
S/T =
SIDEWALK TIE
= UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE MARKER
STY =
STORY
= UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WARNING SIGN
SW =
SIDEWALK
= UNDERGROUND WATER MARKER
IBM =
TEMPORARY BENCH MARK
= UNDERGROUND WATER WARNING SIGN
( C
TYPICAL
o = UTILITY POLE, CONCRETE
=
VCP =
VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE
= UTILITY POLE, METAL
W/
WITH
= UTILITY POLE, WOOD
WF =
W/T =
WOOD FENCE
WALL TIE
cv = VALVE, GAS
RV WO = VALVE, RECLAIMED WATER
+ 25.25
= POINT OF ELEVATION
sv ooi = VALVE, SANITARY
25.2°
= DIMENSION FROM BUILDING TO
= VALVE, WATER
BOUNDARY / RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE
=WELL
STORM CURB INLETS
CONCRETE
ASPHALT
= CONCRETE PAVERS
750' (
BRICK
= TOP OF BANK
= TOE OF SLOPE or CENTER LINE OF DITCH
= 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
= OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND GAS LINE
-
-w -- - - = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER LINE
7Z5,0V(Q
SECTION y TOWNSHIP ., RANGE 15 E.y
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
A/C =
AIR CONDITIONER UNIT
BLDG =
BUILDING
03 = BACKFLOW PRE TER
(C) =
CALCULATED DATA
= BOLLARD or POST
CCR =
CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD
= BOX, CABLE EVISION
CLF =
CHAIN LINK FENCE
M = BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY
CMP =
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
= BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY (TRANSFORMER)
CONC =
CONCRETE
= BOX, TELEPHONE
COR =
CPB =
CORNER
CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK
= DECORATIVE LIGHT POLE
= FIRE HYDRANT
C T =
D) =
CURB TIE
DEED DATA
= FLAGPOLE
DB =
DEED BOOK
= FLARED END SECTION
DIP =
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
= GRATE INLET
ECMP =
ELLIPTICAL CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
= GROUND LIGHT
EL =
ELEVATON
e- = GUY ANCHOR
EP =
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
= LIGHT POLE, CONCRETE
ERCP =
ELLIPTICAL REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
= LIGHT POLE, METAL
(F) =
FIELD DATA
= LIGHT POLE® WOOD
FCM =
FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT
= MAILBOX
FOOT =
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FIR =
FOUND IRON ROD
= MANHOLE, ELECTRIC
FND =
FOUND NAIL do DISC
Q = MANHOLE, GREASE TRAP
FOP =
FOUND OPEN PIPE
Q = MANHOLE, SANITARY SEWER
FPP =
FOUND PINCHED PIPE
= MANHOLE, STORM SEWER
FRRS =
FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE
= MANHOLE, TELEPHONE
F/T =
FENCE TIE
= METER, ELECTRIC
FXC =
FOUND X ®CUT
= METER, GAS
GE =
GRATE ELEVATION
= METER, RECLAIMED WATER
IE =
INVERT ELEVATION
= METER, WATER
(L) =
LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATA
= MITERED END SECTION
LB =
LS =
LICENSED BUSINESS
LICENSED SURVEYOR
= MONITORING WELL
MAS =
MASONRY
= PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNAL
MHW =
MEAN HIGH WATER
= SANITARY CLEAN OUT
NP =
NORMAL PODL
0 = SCHEDULE B -2 ITEM
O/A =
OVERALL
= TELEPHONE RISER
OR =
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
-®- = TRAFFIC SIGN
(P) =
PLAT DATA
= TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX
PB =
PLAT BOOK
= TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE
PG =
PAGE
= UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION MARKER
PLS =
POB =
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
POINT OF BEGINNING
= UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION WARNING SIGN'
POC =
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
= UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC MARKER
PRM =
PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT
=
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WARNING SIGN
PSM =
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER
= UNDERGROUND FIBER OP11C MARKER
P/T =
PAVEMENT TIE
= UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC WARNING SIGN
PVC =
POLY VINYL CHLORIDE
= UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN MARKER
RCP =
REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
= UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN WARNING SIGN
RLS =
REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
= UNDERGROUND GAS MARKER
R/W =
RIGHT-OF-WAY
= UNDERGROUND GAS WARNING SIGN
SEC =
SECTION
= UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER MARKER
SHW =
SIR =
SEASONAL HIGH WATER
SET IRON ROD 1/2" LB 6113
= UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER WARNING SIGN
SND =
SET NAIL & DISC LB 6113
= UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER MARKER
SR =
STATE ROAD
= UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER WARNING SIGN
S/T =
SIDEWALK TIE
= UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE MARKER
STY =
STORY
= UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WARNING SIGN
SW =
SIDEWALK
= UNDERGROUND WATER MARKER
IBM =
TEMPORARY BENCH MARK
= UNDERGROUND WATER WARNING SIGN
( C
TYPICAL
o = UTILITY POLE, CONCRETE
=
VCP =
VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE
= UTILITY POLE, METAL
W/
WITH
= UTILITY POLE, WOOD
WF =
W/T =
WOOD FENCE
WALL TIE
cv = VALVE, GAS
RV WO = VALVE, RECLAIMED WATER
+ 25.25
= POINT OF ELEVATION
sv ooi = VALVE, SANITARY
25.2°
= DIMENSION FROM BUILDING TO
= VALVE, WATER
BOUNDARY / RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE
=WELL
STORM CURB INLETS
CONCRETE
ASPHALT
= CONCRETE PAVERS
BRICK
= TOP OF BANK
= TOE OF SLOPE or CENTER LINE OF DITCH
= 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
= OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND GAS LINE
-
-w -- - - = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER LINE
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER LINE
-
- - - - = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER LINE
--�
24E-RC-P- ® = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER LINE
0
675' (1_)
L1
N
m
N OT:
TREE
INVENTORY WITH NUMBERS AND RATINGS PREPARED BY
OEN'S TREE SURVICE
A/C =
AIR COND111ONER UNIT
= BACKFLOW PREVENTER
BLDG =
BUILDING
0 = BOLLARD or POST
(C) =
CALCULATED DATA
Ell = BOX, CABLE TELEVISION
CCR =
CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD
= BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY
CLF =
CHAIN LINK FENCE
= BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY (TRANSFORMER)
CMP =
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
= BOX, TELEPHONE
CONC =
CONCRETE
1X = DECORATIVE LIGHT POLE
COR =
CORNER
=FIRE HYDRANT
CPB =
CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK
= FLAGPOLE
C T =
CURB TIE
D) =
DEED DATA
= FLARED END SECTION
DB =
DEED BOOK
= = GRATE INLET
DIP =
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
= GROUND LIGHT
ECMP =
ELLIPTICAL CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
= GUY ANCHOR
EL =
ELEVATION
= LIGHT POLE, CONCRETE
EP =
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
= LIGHT POLE, METAL
ERCP =
ELLIPTICAL REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
= LIGHT POLE, WOOD
(F) =
FIELD DATA
= MAILBOX
FCM =
FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT
= MANHOLE, ELECTRIC
FOOT =
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FIR =
FOUND IRON ROD
= MANHOLE, GREASE TRAP
FND =
FOUND NAIL & DISC
= MANHOLE, SANITARY SEWER
FOP =
FOUND OPEN PIPE
= MANHOLE, STORM SEWER
FPP =
FOUND PINCHED PIPE
= MANHOLE, TELEPHONE
FRRS =
FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE
= METER, ELECTRIC
F/T =
FENCE TIE
= METER, GAS
FXC =
FOUND X —CUT
= METER, RECLAIMED WATER
GE =
GRATE ELEVA11ON
= METER, WATER
lE =
(L) =
INVERT ELEVATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATA
= MITERED END SECTION
LB =
LICENSED BUSINESS
= MONITORING WELL
LS =
LICENSED SURVEYOR
= PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNAL
MAS =
MASONRY
= SANITARY CLEANOUT
MHW =
MEAN HIGH WATER
(j = SCHEDULE B -2 ITEM
NP =
NORMAL POOL
= TELEPHONE RISER
O/A =
OVERALL
= TRAFFIC SIGN
OR =
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
= TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX
(P) =
PLAT DATA
= TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE
PB =
PLAT BOOK
= UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION MARKER
PG =
PLS =
PAGE
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
= UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION WARNING SIGN
POB =
POINT OF BEGINNING
= UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC MARKER
POC —
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
= UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WARNING SIGN
PRM =
PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT
= UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC MARKER
PSM =
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER
= UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC WARNING SIGN
P/T =
PAVEMENT TIE
= UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN MARKER
PVC =
POLY VINYL CHLORIDE
= UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN WARNING SIGN
RCP =
REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
= UNDERGROUND GAS MARKER
RLS =
REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
= UNDERGROUND GAS WARNING SIGN
R/W =
RIGHT —OF —WAY
= UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER MARKER
SEC =
SECTION
= UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER WARNING SIGN
SHW =
SIR =
SEASONAL HIGH WATER
SET IRON ROD 1/2" LB 6113
= UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER MARKER
SND =
SET NAIL & DISC LB 6113
= UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER WARNING SIGN
SR =
STATE ROAD
= UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE MARKER
Sf T =
SIDEWALK TIE
= UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WARNING SIGN
STY =
STORY
= UNDERGROUND WATER MARKER
SW =
SIDEWALK
= UNDERGROUND WATER WARNING SIGN
TBM =
TEMPORARY BENCH MARK
4 = UTILITY POLE, CONCRETE
( ) =
TYPICAL
= UTILITY POLE, METAL
VCP =
VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE
= UTILITY POLE, WOOD
W/ =
WITH
Gv Po4 = VALVE, GAS
WF =
W/T =
WOOD FENCE
WALL TIE
RV = VALVE, RECLAIMED WATER
=
TREE NUMBER
sv Do< = VALVE, SANITARY
R =
TREE RATING
wv Doi = VALVE, WATER
= WELL
+ 25.25
= POINT OF ELEVATION
2.5.2'
= DIMENSION FROM BUILDING TO
BOUNDARY / RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE
STORM CURB INLETS
a; .° CONCRETE
E:== = ASPHALT
= CONCRETE PAVERS
= BRICK
= TOP OF BANK
TOE OF SLOPE or CENTER
LINE OF DITCH
6' CHAIN LINK FENCE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND GAS LINE
— = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER LINE
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER LINE
— — 4-2"° —PV£— — — = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER LINE
-- " R , -- = APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER LINE
(G) = GONE
BASED ON BOEN'S TREE SERVICE INVENTORY REPORT FOR
312-404 NORTH OSCEOLA AVENUE
2,
V2 A,
3,-
X 34 Xi�-
p
7
4
. �
4"
5 7 7 2
Q
CD A NP 6�.E
Hjrt
st �E
i i r:ccm A, TOR -P&
0 )`!AFuP7GqrVP�,"sI'
SPACING 6F,--POSTS FILTER FABRIC -C At
11 41,�
'7 i,l V - #; 21 0-Rf- b1i L ALL,"' 25'
MATERIAL r
TO BE 6-10 -,FEET APART�!,,�, PAN, EI ,� C
ill. P, EX r�>TJ
P,
1 F
4 7 CC' CRETE CC' '�43 Ct LRILI
v-5 A 21.57 j -5t P -�i C, E T0,7
C,. �55
7� `w
ROM
IW, ',VCCD FE�,,(,� "i yp') �-j L:e 5 5 9 PLA 7 sif
-�E Iz 2 5, C
P
R-
V,� 1 '9.79 1
x S E E -_ �c�v'
R
A R, L L
�07
L 2�,
7 J X-.�
Rfl-�— 5, T, t !IIn
77, 1 a Y frk I
`;ik R-15 7 -7� R MbVE
'5j 01 - -f-EL -"SL�l -C
2
In- 0 TRA�TJ
a c� P `4 2tY-1L-i ALL 2)
-7
r. , - �x I UNK-3) si AGF &
1, 21 —c
0
,i�- An
LEAF E �4 GRAPHIC SCALE
LL 3 :D �-FTE
I 4', 2'1,^," vo"V V N/ 01
R-
130 0 15 30
c .
k 7,
C R E
I - 11 -
PJ
4, 60
A Y MA,. UHz ...... GEgRGIA STREE-d t,1 �-ao i 71 1�
TTT-T
4 ED 2 7 2
2 7
t
--L 7 ii �'z El 27, 74
1H F
FOR ADDITIONAL STRENGTH i At
T_
FILTER FABRIC- � MATERIAL CAN
BE ATTACHED TO A 6-INCH,(1dX)
4 27. r;
IN FEET
MESH WIRE '
_SCREEN WHICH 2
I inch 30 &
-BACKFILLED TRENCH BEEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS�,-
im 77,
V -
7
'j 277171- Al
-A1
0/ X4
L
7
107
71 z�zlz-lr "I v LA
E7
011
'ZZZZ
zz
2,
MATERIAL f�f 11 N,
FILTER FABRIC � I F
ATTACHING TWO SILT FENCES S31
FASTENEDJO. THE
POSTS OR ff, USED
2, 5
MESH 7// 01.
: � —;
L
-D A 17- LEGEND
# 'r , aAPPROXIMATELY 8
x
POST OF THE 12'*
MUST EXTEND INTO
SECONDFENCE
A TRENCH AND BE
F
�,-INCHES OF FILTER
PLACE THEEND
FABRIC MATERIAL��
INSIDE THE END P-3
ANCHORED VATH-- POST x xm�
2, 2
S E I §L= 0 FNI) Ld p2j
EXISTING ITEM TREE TO BE REMOVED
} x
FIRST FENCE
BACKFILL MATERIAL -7 2-
PLA)GROU 0 '471"
A
WOOD,'OR-
RuIATE uuiH ',037X AR
X, EA
t
FOSTS A x
7 . X
/A-OLOCKW E
DIRECTION TO
+
L P, I A 1, 4
RUNOFF 4, X?v ' ; -X--X—X X�
25k.2,17
CREATE A TIGHT
P 41c;�
P
P
'P
Iq SEAL WTH THE 7 -F -�h PAVEMENT/BUILDING/CURBING
x
4,-
-zl
--zl
7� -zl 2- wN
�S: I 1H, ", x-
P
FABRIC MATERIAL,' -4 IL TO BE REMOVED
"(7-5 5
"Al x-
_-x
x -0 \x-xx-r`-
4-
14
DIRECTION,
X
L
TE
Tu
10 INCHES
RUNOFF WORS 5-
i 3
1�p 711
T,H X
(MI N)
\e SAOB T /1"0 7�, "x
X
f'ICI
4 21RO X� PROJECT LIMITS
1 .3
6 R1=2 C
i P BURY,' Vjp�
) " j -, �) '^ x
'4r - " 1. 1- - --
7 SILT FENCE
14 ;I
T"z
4i
Av
il
t.
F� -7
f
?
X.-
7%
-7
CIVIL ENGINEERING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
PLANNING
KEITH ZAVA" &
ASSOC11ATES9
M.11
INC.
(7 2 7 )
7 9 3-
9 8 8 8
701 ENTERPRISE ROAD E, STE 404
SAFETY HARBOR,
FL 34695
WWW.KE1THZAYAC.00
EB 9351 LC 2600212
il
t.
F� -7
f
?
X.-
7%
-7
CIVIL ENGINEERING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
PLANNING
KEITH ZAVA" &
ASSOC11ATES9
INC.
(7 2 7 )
7 9 3-
9 8 8 8
701 ENTERPRISE ROAD E, STE 404
SAFETY HARBOR,
FL 34695
WWW.KE1THZAYAC.00
EB 9351 LC 2600212
P-1000
C)
I PL-4
i�
U
124
C)
U
F=mi
en
Mal
6m
01
J
Mal
6m
01
�8
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
NORTHEAST GARNER OF A/C =
AIR CONDITIONER UNIT
TREE LEGEND
LOT 1, A.B. & JENNIE CATES BLDG =
BUILDING
= BACKFLOW PREVENTER
SUBDIVISION (C) =
CALCULATED DATA
= BOLLARD or POST
DESCRIPTION
= BAY TREE
CCR =
CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD
® — BOX, CABLE TELEVISION
= BOTTLE BRUSH TREE
CLF =
CHAIN LINK FENCE
= BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY
CMP =
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
® = BOX, ELECTRIC UTIUTY (TRANSFORMER)
= CAMPHOR TREE
CONC =
CONCRETE
011 = BOX, TELEPHONE
A PORTION OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, BLOCK 2 OF JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWATER
= CEDAR
GOR =
CORNER
= DECORATIVE LIGHT POLE
HARBOR AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 13, PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY OF WHICH
CPB =
CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK
=FIRE HYDRANT
PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
a -- CHINABERRY TREE
—
SF38'40'45 ° °W 150.03
G T =
CURB TIE
= CITRUS TREE}
=
DEED DATA
=FLAGPOLE
C = FLARED END SECTION
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF A.B. &JENNIE GATES SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 64 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
DB =
DEED BOOK
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, ALSO BEING THE
= CYPRESS TREE
DIP =
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
= GRATE INLET
INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET AND THE WESTERLY
= ELM TREE
ECMP =
ELLIPTICAL CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
<f = GROUND UGHT
RIGHT -OF —WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE
EL =
ELEVATION
E- = GUY ANCHOR
OF GEORGIA STREET S.88`40'45 "W., 150.03; THENCE 5.00'16'19 "E., 397.79 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
C> = EUCALYPTUS TREE
EP =
PAVEMENT
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
o = LIGHT POLE, CONCRETE
�
THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID LINE, 5.00'16'19' °E., 129,41 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY
= MAGNOLIA TREE
FRCP =
ELLIPTICAL REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
= LIGHT POLE, METAL
RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF JONES STREET, S.89 °58'23 "W., 187.62 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY
=MAPLE TREE
(F) =
FIELD DATA
�x = LIGHT POLE, WOAD
RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF NORTH OSGEOLA AVENUE, N.00`50'40"E., 130.36 FEET; THENCE 5.894418 , " E., 185.09
= MULBERRY TREE
FCM =
FDOT =
FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT
FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
= MAILBOX
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINMNG.
20 10 0 20
= OAK TREE
oa
FIR =
FOUND IRON ROD
O = MANHOLE, ELECTRIC = MANHOLE, GREASE TRAP
Q
CONTAINING 0.5556 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
= OTHER SPECIES
END =
FOUND NAIL & DISC
FOP =
FOUND OPEN PIPE
Q = MANHOLE, SANITARY SEWER
SCALE 1 "=20' = PALM TREE
FPP =
FOUND PINCHED PIPE
= MANHOLE, STORM SEWER
= PECAN TREE
FRRS =
FOUND RAILROAD SPIKES
= MANHOLE, TELEPHONE
t = PERSIMMON TREE
® = METER, ELECTRIC
= PINE TREE
FXC =
GE =
FOUND X- CUT
GRATE ELEVATION
®= METER, GAS
= SYCAMORE TREE
o
IE =
INVERT ELEVATION
m{ = METER, RECLAIMED WATER
= METER, WATER
= WAX MYRTLE TREE
m
(L) =
LB =
LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATA
LICENSED BUSINESS
® = MITERED END SECTION
= WILLOW TREE
LS =
MAS =
LICENSED SURVEYOR
MASONRY
= MONITORING WELL
= PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNAL
1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE, BEING ASSUMED AS SOO ®21'07 "E.
MHW =
MEAN HIGH WATER
= SANITARY CLEANOUT
2. SURVEY MAP AND REPORT OR THE COPIES THEREOF ARE NOT VAUD WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL
=
N�OpRMpAL POOL
(} = SCHEDULE B -2 ITEM
RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR
nN(P
it /A =
OVFRAI I.
!i� = TFI FPHnMF RISFR
nr-i1An[ O nV nn Irn 71 Ait TI I° Palk l ll— MAt',TV - B AYf T- In -- °In1°t°rrt
�8
ti
o
vi
n to
R
to
vi vi
vi (4
w
9
9
zz
L
N.00'08'12'W. (LI 76.03'(M)
76.00'
//V7'�
,,qCo.4_
'r
SOUTH 5JO.J7'(M)
SOUTH 5JO.23'(L)
N. FORT HARRISON AVENUE
,3j7,1::Z6 / I
CLEARWATER, FL. FAX (727) 461-0696
AUTHORIZATION 6947
FA N.M49911m . mi
VEy SECTION. 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH,
1&=
E'
-WATER VALVE
+
+
-TELEPHONE BOX
+
-CABLE BOX
0
-SANITARY MANHOLE
PARCEL 1:
-WATER BOX
30O-410 OSCEOLA AVENUE
-POWER POLE
LOTS I THROUGH 7 AND THE 10 FOOT ALLEY LYING WEST OF LOTS I THROUGH J OF AS. & JENNIE CATES SUBDMSION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK f,
-LIGHT POLE
@
-WATER PIPES
BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. •
-VALVE BOX
BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 7 OF SAID AD & JENNIE !RTES SUBDIVISION. 7HEWCE N.88-5821-E, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF
-FIRE HYDAANT
A
-TRAmc Box
E]
-LIGHT BOX
0
-ELECMIC BOX
CURVE TABLE
NO. I
RADIUS
45.00'
DELTA
20`19'15'
ARC
15,96'
7ANGENr
8.06'
CHORD
15.60�ff)
1588'1,)
OR BEARING
ImIm
9
911
M
0
D
0
FILE NO.
SUR VEYE D B yi:
V1 S / N �3
OOD ZONE- NO' 2 G'l
Ell i
MAYER r 4495
<177-7
r
Cj\
At
0 20 40 80
LEGAL-
1 401
PARCEL 1:
30O-410 OSCEOLA AVENUE
LOTS I THROUGH 7 AND THE 10 FOOT ALLEY LYING WEST OF LOTS I THROUGH J OF AS. & JENNIE CATES SUBDMSION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK f,
PAGE 64, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA AND A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST
Llyf—rAELL
BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. •
L-L S.01'02'11"E. 12.34'SM)
BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 7 OF SAID AD & JENNIE !RTES SUBDIVISION. 7HEWCE N.88-5821-E, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF
S.OL7441001W, 12.21'(4
GEORGIA STREET (A 40 FOOT' RIGHT OF WAY), A DISTANCE OF 211.75 = TO THE WE37ERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AvhwUE (A 55
L-Z S,89*57'32'E, 79.04*(M)
FOOT RIGHT OF W4)9; THENCE SOU7K ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 337.16 FEET- THENCE LFAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE
EAST 79.25'(L)
N89756102-W., A DISTANCE OF 211.11 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE (A 40 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE NOO.06-14 `W,
L-Z N.00'I3'41'W. 26.8J'(M)
ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOr 4 THROUGH 7 OF SAID A.B. & JENNIE CA TES SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF
NORTH 2ZOO'(L)
333:12 FEET 70 THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
L-A S-79*3959"W. 80.46ywo
PARCEL 2.
S.79-2406-W. 80.28'(4
LOTS A AND 8 OF BERGENS REPLAT AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 26 PAGE 41, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINE LLAS COUNTY FLORIDA TOGETHER WITH THE EAST
L-5. N.00'00'2JE. 156.99'(M)
1/5 OF LOT Z AND THE WEST' 113 OF LOT 3 OF JONES OF NICHOLSONS ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, AS RECORDED IN PLAT H1, PAGE IJ PUBLIC
RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART, ALSO TOGETHER WITH A VACATED ALLEY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL
NORTH 15ZOO'(L)
RECORD BOOK 7546, PAGE 607 OF THE' PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY ALL LYING IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST BEING
L-& S.00*145J"E. 76.06'(M)
FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
7&00'(L)
L-7. N.00'07'J4W. 169.92'(M)
BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 6 OF SAID BERGENS REPLAT• THENCE SOUTH, ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT
N.00.2300 W, 169.60'(L)
H4ATISON AVENUE (A 55 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY) AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS A AND 8 OF SAID BERGENS REPLAY; A DISTANCE OF 179.99 FEET TO
THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF JONES STREET; THENCE N69*4945'W, ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID JONES STREET AND THE
L-& N.89492JE. 41,31'(M)
SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT A AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE EAST 1/3 OF LOT 2 AND THE WEST 1/3 OF LOT J OF SAID JONES SUBDMSION OF
N.89-41108-E. 41.77(L)
N I C H O L S O N ' S A D D I T I O N T O G LEARWATER HARBOR, A DISTANCE OF 186 65 FEET, THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF _WD EAST I/J Or LOT 2,
L-9. M.00'00'47W. 180.04'(A4)
JONES SUBDMSION OF NICHOLSONS ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, A DISTANCE OF 179.99 FEET, THENCE S69-49-47t A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEEr,
NORTH 179,99(L)
THENCE NORM A DISTANCE OF I2.47 FEET, THENCE S89-4947-E, A DISTANCE OF 161.65 FEET TO THE WEMERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT
HARRISON AVENUE THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH, A DISTANCE OF 1226 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
L-10. S.8949 47`E. 25.00'(hf)
589'49 47E 25.00'(L)
AND
L-11. N.00'50'13W 12.48'(M)
NORTH 12,47'(L)
PARCEL /I
L- 12. N.89*58'02'W, 49.55*(M)
301 OSCEOLA AVENUE 400 & 410 JONES STREET
N.89-581021W. 49.46(L)
THE WEST 213 OF LOT 2 BLOCK 2, JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSONS ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED
L -13 S.00*38'00V 87.64(M)
IN FLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINE LLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART OF LESS THE
s,ocria,00-w. 87.65 '(c)
NORTHWEST CORNER AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST' CORNER OF LOT Z BLOCK 2. OF SAID JONES SUBDMSION FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE N.00'230O`W., ALONG THE
S.00'38'00-W. 77.65(P)
WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2• 169.80 =; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURV& (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET- A TANG MT OF 8,07 FEET
A CHORD OF 15,55 FEE• A CHORD BEARING N.49*4246-E), A DISTANCE OF 15.96 FaT; THENCE N.89-41-08-E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAJO LOT Z
41.77 FEET;• THENCE SX0723'001E., 180.00 I=, THENCE S89w06w, 53.95 FEET To THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL12
THE SOUTH 76 FEET OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, JONES SUBDIVISION OF XICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA OF WHICH PINE-LAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A FARr
TOGETHER WMI THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THE WEST LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND AND THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
OSCEOLA AVENUE, LYING AND BEING IN PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA
FARCELIJ
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK Z OF THE JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON's
ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, ACCORDING TO THE CORRECTED MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS
OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA. OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART; RUN THENCE NOT230O'W, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1,
157 FEET FOR A POINT- OF BEGINNING, • THENCE 57924'06`W, 80.28 FEET' THENCE S.0044001W, 12.21 FEET, THENCE EAST, PA94LLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID LOT 79.25 FEET MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST` LINE OF SAID LOT' THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT, 27 FEET MORE OR LESS, TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
AND
302-308 OSCEOLA AVENUE
FROM THE SO EST (SW) CORNER OF THE SOUTH EAST QUARTER (SE 114) OF THE SOUTH EAST QUARTER (SE 114) OF SEC77ON 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH,
RANGE 15 EAST- RUN WEST 398.68 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 38 MINUTES E4Sr ALONG THEW LINE OF
OSCEOLA AVENUE 545.68 FEET' TO THE NORTH LINE OF AN ALLEY AS SHOWN IN JONES SUBDIVISION 70 THE TOWN OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA; THENCE EAST
58.0 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 83.16 FEET MORE OR LESS, THENCE WEST 250.55 FEET MORE OF LESS TO THE WATERS OF CLEARWATER
BAY THENCE SOUTH 22 112 DEGREES WEST 90.01 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT 285 FEET WEST OF THE POINT' OF BEGINNING; THENCE EAST 285.0 FEET
TO POINT BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH ALL SUBMERGED LAND A RIPARIAN RIGHTS APPURTENANT` TO SAID TRACT DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
TRACT 23, FROM AN INTERSEC770M OF THE NORTH LINE OF JONES STREET AND THE WEST LINE OF-OSCEOLA AVENUE OF JONES SUBDIVISION /N CLEARWATER,
FLORIDA RUN NORTH ALONG WEST LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE 190 FEET THENCE WEST 213:9 FEET -70 AVERAGE HIGH WATER LINE OF CLEARWATER BAY TO
POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE 725 FEET TO CHANNEL IN CLEARWATER BAY' THENCE 725 FEET TO CHANNEL IN CLEARWATER BAY • THENCE NORTHEASTERLY
ALONG EAST SIDE OF CHANNEL A DISTANCE OF 83.17 FEET DUE NORTH, THENCE EAS7`- 725 FEET TO AVEPAGE HIGH WATER LINE OF CLEARWATER SAY; THENCE
IN A SOUTHWESTERLY COURSE ALONG THE AVERAGE HIGH WATER LINE 70 POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS THAT POR77ON DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN ORDER FOR
TAKING FILED JANUARY 13, 1961, IN O.R. BOOK 1083, PAGE 97, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINE LLAS COUNTY. FLORIDA
LOTS A AND B OF CLOWS C. LUTZ SUBDMSION ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGE 76 PUBLIC RECORDS OF
PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA TOG ER WITH ALL SUBMERGED LANDS, BAY BOTTOMS AND RIPARIAN RIGHTS 7HEREUNTO APPERTAINING OR IN ANYWISE BELONGING,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST` CORNER OF GLOMS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGE 76 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY
FLORIDA, AND RUN THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 06'15® WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 65.48 FEEr TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 5400' WEST 630.0 FaT MORE OR LESS TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE CHANNEL IN CLEARWATER BAY-
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CHANNEL, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
SAID COLVIS C. LUTZ SUBDMSION, • THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY SION OF THE SAID NORTHERLY LINE 637.0 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT TO TP-m- WEST COAST INLAND NAWG4770N DISTRICT ON THAT PART LYING
KTTHIN 250 FEET OF THE CE LINE OF THE WEST C04ST INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY CANAL, CONTAINING 0.28 ACRE, MORE OR LESS.
THAT PART OF A CERTAIN TEN (10) FEET OF UNNAMED ALLEY DUENDING WEST TO THE WATERS OF CLEARWATER HARBOR FROM THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF
OSCEOLA AVENUE AND LYING SOUTH OF THE FREXER PROPERTY AND LYING NORTH OF LOT A OF CLOVIS C.,_4UrZ SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK
35 PAGE 76 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA SAID ALLEY HAVING BEEN VACATED BY THE C17Y OF CL WATER, PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA.
AND BEING THE SAME PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON QUIT CLAIM DEED FROM AK, FRE&ER AND SARAH RAY FREILER, HIS WIFE, IN O.R. 589, PAGE 289, PUBLIC
RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA
A PARCEL OF SUBMERGED LAND IN CLEARWATER HARBOR IN SEC77ON 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 LAST PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA MORE
PAR77CULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A OF THE GLOMS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGE 76 PUBLIC RECORDS OF
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA SAID POINT BEING ON THE AVERAGE HIGH WATER LINE OF CLEARWATER HARBOR, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING 555??.97 FEET
NORTH AND 1949.66 FEET WEST OF THE SOUTHEAST' CORNER OF _WD SECTION 9, FROM AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN THENCE N89 DEGREES 24'16'
WEST 282.41 FEET TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER BULKHEAD LINE; THENCE RUN N07 DEGREES 28'50- 64Sr 10.07 FEET ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE, RUN
THENCE S89 DEGREES 24-16- EAST 281.21 FEET TO THE AVERAGE HIGH WATER UNE OF CLEARWATER HARBOR, RUN THENCE SOO DECREES 38 00' WEST 10,00
FEET ALONG S41D AVERAGE HIGH WATER LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
FILE NO.
SUR VEYE D B yi:
V1 S / N �3
OOD ZONE- NO' 2 G'l
Ell i
MAYER r 4495
<177-7
r
Cj\
H
12
m
1
SrR
SIY Ls-
A '4 PO
$ ?
C7,j7/ 4
SO
-SVVMJN =3 K(O
M. MRr WWON AVENUE
40
an
M.89'58'020W.
49.551(m)
0
-LXK &)X
-uwwwm I= -now Box
-MAMC4 TREr
VO
11 me
Ly
+
7�
rM�Jroj 111TIVOW1 SISSWW�, 4* 0 r,
W—MAY's IMM-Alm"Fo RAITGE- 15 EAS.
a
10
pm
1" = 40'
Harrison Village
Tree Inventory
Page I of 2
I
O
e.4
Mr
4XV
0
-LXK &)X
-uwwwm I= -now Box
-MAMC4 TREr
VO
11 me
Ly
+
7�
rM�Jroj 111TIVOW1 SISSWW�, 4* 0 r,
W—MAY's IMM-Alm"Fo RAITGE- 15 EAS.
a
10
pm
1" = 40'
Harrison Village
Tree Inventory
Page I of 2
I
____ � _-__~_-__�_____-__
�� _�_
11
r�
Harrison Village
Tree Inventory
Page 2 of 2