445 HAMDEN DRqy,- IClffidel) -�( .
Jo e 4-s /" de- --E
Tree Inventory
Dockside II Site
445 Hamden Drive
Clearwater Beach
7/12/2005
Prepared by Alan Mayberry
For: Sea Stone Resort/ Fulvio Divello
The following report is submitted by Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist, and includes
findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in
the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and
my report is factual and unbiased. This report is the property of Fulvio Divello and will
not be given to other entities unless so directed.
Site Overview and Canopy Analysis
The subject property is presently being utilized as commercial property on Clearwater
Beach. The tree canopy is composed mostly of palm species dominated by the native
sabal palm ( Sabal palmetto) and the exotic Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta).
The only native tree species is the live oak (Quercus virginiana), which is being utilized
to meet parking lot landscape code requirements. The palms are in good overall condition
with a few exceptions and most of the palms are worthy of preservation.
A large percentage of the sabal palms have nicks, gouges or areas where the bark is
sloughing off. Sabal palms are not raised in nurseries but are typically taken from the
wild and it is common for them to experience some damage to the trunks. This factor
downgrades the palm as it affects the aesthetic qualities of the palm but rarely affects the
health. If the trunk damage is minor the palm should be preserved if it is otherwise
healthy. This inventory will endeavor to rate both the aesthetic and health related aspects
of all trees and palms. All trees existing on this site that are designated as protected
species per the criteria of the City of Clearwater code are identified herein with overall
condition ratings and specific recommendations.
Tree Inventory Data
A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a
valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could
lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four
codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the data used in
the inventory:
Tree# - location - Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that
corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the
field.
Size — Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If
there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area
below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of clear trunk (C.T.).
Species — Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in
the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter.
Condition Rating — The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural
strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities,
decayed wood,. split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and
attachments, i.e., well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the
trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included
bark.
Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net
photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health
will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree
as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating
include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass); 2)
crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a signn that the
tree is making and storing energy.
The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any
unique features. The rating scale is 0 -6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen.
Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as
follows:
0- A dead tree
1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease
or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1
ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). A tree with a rating
M
of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury
or property damage.
2 — A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such -as - codominant stems with included
bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback,
cracked /split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low
energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies
or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s)
can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable
amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating.
3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be
corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal
area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon
have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average
appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible.
4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems
that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive
appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree
should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees
exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can
be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic
amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the property and
should be preserved.
5 — A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health
and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this
category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in
this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity
and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a 95 rating lends considerable value
to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is
worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation.
6 — A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior
qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown
ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness.
A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures
that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an
undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an
experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified
Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree.
Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not
covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may
include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It
may also have recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree.
NOTE: A. tree inventory is typically valid for 3 -5 years. However, events such as
drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance and
severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial
maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely
affected, have the tree inspected by a qualified International. Society of
Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist.
Note: Whenever possible it is advised to adhere to inventory recommendations when
selecting trees to be preserved. For example, trees rated 4.0 and higher should be
preserved if at all , possible, while trees rated 2.0 and lower should be removed unless
otherwise noted in the inventory. Trees rated 2.5 are generally recommended for relnoval
unless remedial work is performed to upgrade them. Trees rated 3.0 and 3.5 are average
trees that have good potential and warrant serious consideration for preservation but not
to the extent that site plan modifications are necessary.
NOTE: This inventory was performed on June 30 and July 1, 2005 and includes every
tree and palm on site that is protected according to the criteria of the City of Clearwater
code.
Tree Inventory
Tree # Size ,Species Rating
1 4" ponytail (Beaucarnea recurvata) 3.0
Comments: The ponytail is an evergreen tree mistakenly called a palm. This tree has two
stems, one 14' in height and the second 7'. This tree is growing in an island that is a focal
point for landscaping in the front of the existing building. The ponytail tree can evolve
into an attractive specimen and has the potential to make a striking landscape statement
with its unique form. As this area is a focal point for a landscape feature preservation of
this tree is recommended or replacement with a plant that will provide a more immediate
effect.
2 18' C.T. sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 3.5
Comments: This palm has an attractive curve in the trunk and the crown is very healthy_
The trunk has a few pits but overall it is an attractive and healthy palm and worthy of
preservation.
3 22' C.T. sabal palm 4.0
Comments: This palm is growing against a fenced enclosure and has a small gouge on the
trunk 1' above grade and some bark has sloughed off. These conditions are not
debilitating and detract little from the overall appearance. The palm has a slight curve in
the trunk that enhances its aesthetic value. The crown is very healthy and this palm is
recommended for preservation.
4 13' C.T. sabal palm 3.0
Comments: This palm has a few vertical splits in the trunk most likely from too much
water at some point in its life. This condition is not serious but is a slight downgrading
factor. The palm also has a gouge at the base of the trunk and several nicks on the trunk..
However, the palm is healthy and the trunk sweeps up towards the east creating a
pleasing appearance. Recommend preservation.
5 20' C.T. sabal palm 3.5
Comments: This palm is very healthy but its overall condition is downgraded due to
small wounds on the trunk. It is still an attractive palm overall and worthy of
preservation.
6 15' C.T. cabal palm 2.5
Comments: This palm has a trunk restriction 12' above grade that is approximately one
half the diameter of the trunk, The overall condition has been downgraded because of this
condition that was likely caused by previous over pruning. A restriction this severe could
lead to breakage and failure and consequently, this palm is not recommended for
preservation.
NOTE: Palms # 7 and several other palms on this site have been pruned to a 10 — 2- cut.
(A configuration that causes the crown to have the appearance of the hands of a clock in
the ten minutes until two position). Pruning palms this hard over time causes them to
weaken and makes them more susceptible to insect attack or diseases. These palms can
be restored to good health and appearance if they are pruned and maintained properly
(palms often suffer from nutrient deficiencies and benefit from fertilization with a slow
release fertilizer designed for palms). Ideally, only dead/dying fronds and seed pods
should be removed, however they can usually tolerate a 9 -3 cut if a "cleaner" look is
desired.
7 15' C.T. sabal palm 2.0
Comments: This palm has several wounds in the lower trunk that girdle the trunk. The
wounds appear to be caused by a chainsaw probably from pruning when the palm was
young. The palm is still healthy overall but the appearance of the palm has been affected
significantly and downgraded accordingly. Recommend removal unless aesthetics are not
a concern.
8 12' C.T. sabal palm
3.0
Comments: This palm is healthy but is being pruned in a 10 -2 fashion. Recommend
preservation of this palm and implementing proper pruning.
9 20' C.T. Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta) 3.5
Comments: This palm has been over pruned and still has many of the boots (the bases of
old fronds that have been removed) attached to the trunk. However, the trunk and crown
are healthy and the appearance will improve if the boots are removed. Recommend
preservation and cease over pruning.
10 14' C.T. sabal palm
M
Comments: This palm has a sound trunk and the crown reflects a very healthy systemic
system Recommend preservation.
11 12' C.T. sabal palm
MR
Comments: This palm has a few nicks in the lower trunk and two minor trunk restrictions
but is otherwise very healthy and worthy of preservation.
12 14' C.T. sabal palm
3:0
Comments: This palm has a trunk restriction 12' above grade that is not serious. The
trunk and crown are sound and this palm is worthy of preservation.
13 14' C.T. sabal palm
3.5
Comments: This palm grows up straight then has a crook at about 11' and the crown
grows to the east. Palms often develop leans, crooks and sweeping curves and it is
generally considered to add to their beauty. This is a good palm and is recommended for -
preservation.
14 14' C.T. sabal palm
9
Comments: This palm has a crook to the west 11' up and therefore compliments palm
#13 that is growing nearby. It is healthy and just needs a few loose boots removed.
Recommend preservation.
15 14' C.T. sabal palm
3.5
Comments: This palm also has crook in the trunk and is very healthy and attractive. This
palm is growing along with palms # 13'& 14 and forms and attractive cluster. If at all
possible they should be preserved together or transplanted and placed in the same
orientation.
16 11' C.T. sabal palm
2.5
Continents: This.pahn is downgraded due to the presence of several gouges on the trunk.
It is however healthy and could be preserved if aesthetics are not a great concern.
17 11' C.T. sabal palm
Ulf]
Comments: This palm has a small trunk restriction 9' above grade and then the crown
bends slightly to the north. This palm is healthy and worthy of preservation.
18 355, 4 ", 6" 7" ficus (Ficus spp.)
1.0
Comments: This tree is growing in a small cut out in an area of ornate paver tiles. The
ficus is a tree capable of growing to massive proportions and in time produces large
destructive surface roots. In addition, it is not cold hardy and is subject to periodic freeze
damage. It is strongly recommended that this tree be removed.
Note: Palms # 19 — 39 are a row of sabal palms growing adjacent to the seawall along the
eastern property line and are similar in size and condition. They have very full crowns
and have not been over pruned and all are healthy and recommended for preservation.
The only downgrading factor on this row of palms is an assortment of old wounds in the
form of nicks and vertical cracks. But they are not serious and as these palms are in the
background the blemishes are virtually unnoticeable.
19 12' C.T
sabal palm
:1
Comments: This palm has a good trunk with some pits and a small trunk restriction.
Recommend preservation.
20 13" C.T. sabal palm
3.5
Comments: This palm has a slight trunk restriction 7' above grade and a few small old
wounds but is very healthy. Recommend preservation.
21 12' C.T
sabal palm
4.0
Comments: This pahn has a few nicks but is otherwise very healthy. Recommend
preservation.
22 13' C.T. sabal palm
3.5
Comments: This pahn has a few blemishes but is very healthy. Recommend preservation.
M
23 13' C.T. sabal pahn 3.5
Comments: This pahn also has a few blemishes but is otherwise very healthy.
Recommend preservation.
24 13' C.T. sabal palm 4.0
Comments: This pahn has a beautiful crown. Recommend preservation.
25 12' C.T. sabal pahn 4.0
Comments: This palm has a few nicks but a very full crown. Recommend. preservation.
26 12' C.T. sabal pahn 3.0
Comments: This palm has two trunk restrictions (one just below the bud) and a small slit
6' above grade on the south side but is healthy and recommended for preservation.
27 12' C.T. sabal pahn 3.5
Comments- This palm has a small restriction beneath the bud and a few pits but has a
very full crown and is healthy. Recommend preservation.
28 11' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 .
Comments: This pahn also has a restriction just below the bud indicating that at one time
this palm like many others in this row was likely pruned too.hard. Currently the crowns
are full and they should continue to be maintained with full crowns. In addition, the
pahns would benefit from fertilization with a slow release palm fertilizer. Recommend
preservation.
29 13' C.T. sabal palm 3.5
Comments: This palm has a few pits and a minor trunk restriction but is otherwise
healthy and recommended for preservation.
30 14' C.T. sabal palm 4.0
Comments: This palm has a slight trunk restriction just below the bud but has a beautiful
crown and is recommended for preservation.
31 15' C.T. sabal palm 4.0
Comments: This pahn has a few small gouges but is beautiful and very healthy.
Recommend preservation.
32 16' C.T. cabal palm
4.0
Comments: This palm has a few blemishes but is otherwise a very high quality palm.
Recommend preservation.
33 15' C.T. sabal palm
1
Comments: This is another very high quality palm with a few minor blemishes on the
trunk. Recommend preservation.
34 15' C.T. sabal pahn
.l
Comments: This palm has a minor trunk restriction and some pits on the trunk but is
otherwise very healthy and attractive. Recommend preservation.
35 14' C.T. sabal palm
4.0
Comments: This palm is very healthy and has a large crown. It has minor damage from a
string trimmer at the base but is very attractive and should be preserved.
NOTE: Several of the palms in this row are receiving minor damage from string
trimmers in the process of removing grass growing around the base of the palms. If the
grass is kept away from the base this will not occur.
36 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.5
Comments: This palm has a few slices in the trunk and a trunk restriction but is healthy
and recommended for preservation.
37 13' C.T. sabal palm 3.5
Comments: This palm has a trunk restriction 9' above grade and has had some bark that
sloughed off in a few areas. But it is very healthy and is recommended. for preservation.
38 14' C.T. sabal palm 3.0
Comments: This palm has a trunk restriction one half the size of the trunk located 8'
above grade that downgrades its value. The trunk bends to the east past the seawall and
then sweeps upward. It has very high aesthetic value, is healthy and is worthy of
preservation.
39 15' C.T. sabal palm 4.0
Comments: This palm also bends to the east and then grows straight upward. It is healthy
and has a beautiful form. Recommend preservation.
40 15' C. T. sabal palm . 2.5
Comments: This palm has been downgraded because it has decay at the base on the
northeast side. The decay is not debilitating at this time but could progress into a
problem. The crown is healthy and this palm could be preserved but should be inspected
annually to determine if the decay is progressing.
41 13' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 -
Comments: This palm has a few nicks and minor string trimmer damage but overall is
healthy and worthy of preservation.
42 13" live oak (Quercus virginiana) 3.0
Comments: This tree is located in a 10' wide landscape buffer located at the north end of
the property. This tree was planted with the root ball surrounded by a synthetic burlap
bag. The bag was never removed and its presence has caused the development of girdling
roots within the bag. The trunk is sound but forks 8' above grade forming a codominant
stem The crotch is not included at this time but will be in the future. The south side of
the crown is very healthy with a high live crown ratio and crown density. However, there
is about 6" of dieback on the top and also some dieback on the north side of the crown.
This tree may have suffered from salt -water inundation from last year's severe storms,
which could account for the dieback. Another cause of the dieback could be the synthetic
burlap causing girdling roots. This tree is worthy of preservation but needs to have the
burlap removed and should be inspected annually for the presence of included bark. If the
crotch becomes included it should be cabled and braced. It should also be noted that the
crown of this tree is growing very low on the north side and needs to be elevated.
43 8" live oak 1.5
Comments:'This tree is located within a landscape buffer between the parking lot and
Hamden Drive. There is a large rack of six overhead utility wires located approximately
5' to the west of this tree. Consequently the tree has been severely pruned on the west
side and will always be a one -sided tree. This tree should be removed and replaced with
accent trees or palms that meet the City of Clearwater's criteria for landscape buffers.
44 14" live oak 2.0
Comments: This tree is also located in the same buffer strip as tree #43 and is contending
with the wires and a utility pole. This tree branches into three codominant stems 3' above
grade. The crotches are not included at this time but will likely become included in the
near future. The tree has good systemic health at this time but will be a one -sided tree due
to the presence of the wires. This tree should be replaced with accent trees or palms that
meet the City's,landscape code requirements.
NOTE: Trees #45 — 62 are a row of sabal palms growing within planters between the
existing building and Hamden Drive. Most of the palms have trunk restrictions at a
similar height that indicate previous hard pruning or a nutrient deficiency. However, they
are for the most part healthy and attractive and warrant preservation with the exception of
tree #49. Tree #51 is rated 3.0 but will have to be removed as it is growing against a
utility wire. In addition palms #54, 55 & 56 are growing very close to the wires and
should be checked out by Progress Energy for safety. Call Progress Energy for
assistance as an electrical hazard exists with the removal of any of these palms.
45 . 13' C.T. sabal palm 3.0
Comments: This palm has a major trunk restriction 12' above grade that downgrades its
condition. In addition some of the oak branches from tree #44 are growing into the
crown. Overall the palm is healthy and attractive and should be preserved.
46 17' C.T
sabal palm
4.0
Comments: This palm has a very good trunk and crown and is recommended for
preservation.
47 17' C.T. sabal palm
3.5
Comments: This palm has a minor trunk restriction but is otherwise healthy. Recommend
preservation.
48 16' C.T. sabal palm
3.0
Comments: This palm has a restriction 2' below the bud then the trunk up to the bud is
about two - thirds the size of the uniform trunk. This situation has caused a slight
downgrade but the palm is healthy and attractive and warrants preservation.
49 14' C.T. sabal palm 2.5
Comments: This palm has a trunk restriction 8' above grade and 2' below the bud the
trunk tapers to a diameter of two - thirds the trunk. The crown is dipped to the west and it
appears that the bud could collapse although this is not certain. This palm is not
recommended for preservation.
50 15' C.T
sabal palm
UK
Comments: This palm has a few gouges and areas where the bark is sloughing off.
However, it is healthy and warrants preservation_
51 15' C.T. sabal palm 3.0*
Comments: This palm has a trunk restriction and narrows below the bud. The crown
leans to the west and grows against one of the utility wires running parallel with Hamden
Drive. The palm is rated 3.0 because it is basically healthy and attractive but it should be
removed due to the presence of the wire. One of the fronds rubbing against the wire could
start a fire; consequently the palm should be removed. Call Progress Energy of Florida
for assistance with removing this palm, as an electrical hazard exists.
52 14' C.T. sabal palm
3.5
Comments: This palm has minor damage to the trunk and is a good overall palm.
Recommend preservation.
53 12' C.T. sabal palm
3.0
Comments: This palm has a trunk restriction 11' above grade. The crown is healthy.
Recommend preservation.
54 14' C.T. sabal palm
3.5*
Comments: This palm has a trunk restriction 13' above grade but has a beautiful crown.
This is a very good palm and should be preserved. This palm is also growing very close
to the wires and may have to be transplanted a few feet to the east. Recommend that
Progress Energy look at this palm while they look at #53. If they advise removal ask
for their assistance.
55 13' C.T. sabal palm 3.0*
Comments: This palm is healthy but has a trunk restriction and is growing close to the
wires. Consult with Progress Energy per the recommendations for palms #53 & 54.
56 15' C.T. sabal palm 4.0*
Comments: This palm has a slight restriction in the trunk but has a very attractive crown
and is healthy. However, this palm is interfering with the pole that is supporting the wires
and some of the insulators. Recommend consulting with Progress Energy as in the
case of palms #51, 54 & 55.
57 15' C.T. sabal palm
3.5
Comments: This palm has a good crown and is healthy. It has a trunk restriction but is
worthy of preservation.
58 14' C.T. sabal palm
M
Comments: This palm has a slight trunk restriction but has a beautiful crown and is very
healthy. Recommend preservation.
59 16' C.T. sabal palm 4.0
Comments: This palm has a large crown and is very healthy. Recommend preservation.
60 14' C.T. sabal palm 4.0
Comments: This palm has a beautiful crown and is very healthy. Recommend
preservation.
61 14' C.T. sabal palm 4.0
Comments: This palm has a very slight restriction 13' above grade but has a beautiful
crown and is healthy. Recommend preservation.
62 14' C.T. sabal palm 3.5
Comments: This palm has two slight restrictions in the trunk but has a good crown and is
healthy. Recommend preservation.
63 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.0
Comments: The trunk of this palm is charred from 5' above grade to 9' above grade.
However, this condition does not affect the palm but downgrades its appearance. There is
a slight trunk restriction 10' above grade. However, the tree is healthy and the crown is
attractive. Recommend preservation.
64 14' C.T. sabal palm 3.0
Comments: The appearance of this palm has been downgraded due to the presence of
several chainsaw cuts on the trunk from 4' to 9' above grade. The remainder of the palm
looks good and it is healthy. Recommend preservation.
65 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.0
Comments: This palm also has minor charring on the trunk and some slices as well. The
crown is attractive and the palm is healthy. Recommend preservation.
66 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.5
Comments: This palm has an unusual appearance as it grows at a slant to the northwest
and has a very large crown. The trunk tapers and is narrow but it is not a problem and the
overall palm is healthy. Recommend preservation.
67 1 1' C.T. sabal palm 4.0
Comments: This palm also ,grows at a slant to the northwest and has a very attractive full
crown. Recommend preservation.
68 13' C.T. sabal palm 4.0
Comments: this palm is healthy and has a very good crown. Recommend preservation.
69 10' C.T. sabal palm 1 3.5
Comments: This palm has a few gouges in the trunk but is very attractive and healthy.
Recommend preservation.
70 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.5
Comments: This palm has a slight trunk restriction but has a beautiful crown and is very
healthy. Recommend preservation.
71 11' C.T. sabal palm 3.5
Comments: This palm has a trunk restriction 1' below the bud. The crown is very
attractive and the palm is healthy. Recommend preservation.
72 14' C.T. sabal palm 3.0
Comments: This palm has an elongated bud and a rather skimpy crown. It also has a slit
in the trunk 3' above grade on the northeastern side that has a small area of soft decay
present. The palm is healthy and will improve if-pruned correctly and fertilized with a
slow release palm fertilizer. Recommend preservation.
73 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.5
Comments: This pahn has an elongated bud and a very attractive crown. Recommend
preservation.
74 25' C.T. Washington pahn . 2.0
Comments: This palm has major sections of the trunk that are sloughing off at the base up
to 3' above grade and then again about 10 — 15' above grade. This factor causes a
significant downgrade in the palm's aesthetic value. However, it is systemically healthy
and has an attractive crown and could be preserved if the property owner approves in the
appearance, otherwise recommend removal.
75 25' C.T. Washington palm 2.0
Comments: This pahn also has a large amount of bark sloughing off that downgrades its
aesthetic value. This palm and #74 may have been spiked as a good deal of bark is
peeling off and there is evidence of wounds. The crown is attractive and the palm is
otherwise healthy and this palm could be preserved if the property owner approves,
otherwise recommend removal.
76 25' C.T. Washington palm 2.0
Comments: This is another palm with extensive decay at the base and with large areas of
bark sloughing off The inner core is solid and the crown is attractive and healthy. This
palm is recommended.for removal unless the property owner approves of the appearance.
If this palm and palms 475 & 76 are preserved they should be inspected annually to
determine if the decay is progressive and the palms are in danger of failing.
77 <I0' C.T. cabal palm N/A
Comments: This palm is growing in the right of way of Hamden Drive and is not
protected by City of Clearwater code as it has less than 10' of clear trunk. The palm is
growing beneath utility wires and will cause problems in the future. Call the City's Right
of Way Maintenance Division (5624950) and ask them to remove this palm..
i
AL PR V Et EN 3 2 E
PAVE-1 ENT AND R R1`R,,1G 1-0-
10 BE 'IURUED 011 RE-CE VE- OUN,7--r.)
LN,DSCIUING TIREATINUE
g-
FP
Nodyetio Bifurocato
272
Y, —
Ixora Nora Grant
1460
Pi
Juniperus Chinen5is
330
LAC
Lantana sop.
1&0
LAN
Lontono sap.
b5q
Lr'IG
A'NY 0444GES IN Spr--,
SPECIRCAMmrS r040 DEE
WITHOLn, T4 S!G,
-k-�041SENT OF NE
LAP IN' &Rk�--jop
RENDZr,es-,
PLAIN A=P PP,OV,�
IL VOID,
To
L�f � I lklk�j fail
-'I'll(jk D Oil) pg)pq7rjp-q
L,11 it 1-jrVilk
I 11f
"i
.1 iv u 11C 5 1
D 1 1,0
Flont I'-Iotef-iols ScheGk:�-�
Quantity Code Botanical Name
25
FP
Nodyetio Bifurocato
272
ix
Ixora Nora Grant
1460
Pi
Juniperus Chinen5is
330
LAC
Lantana sop.
1&0
LAN
Lontono sap.
b5q
Lr'IG
Liriope Nuscari
2
l
Ligustrurn spp.
24
NOS
Nerlur-n oleander
322
NOP
Neriurn oleander- petite
90
POI
Fodocor-pus 5PP.
I
QV
Quercus virginiona
453
RI
Rophiolepis indices
22
SP
Sobal palmetto
170
TJV
Trochelosper-mum josrniniodes
1q4
NR
Gonocarpu5 Erectu5 Ser.
Ex�str( I I
Code Corn
,� Plant 'oteriols--
'on Name Code Common Norne
AP Areco Folrn
ARO Queen PoIrn
CV Bottlebrush
FIB Ficus Tree
IVS Dwarf Youpon Holly
LJT Liqustrum Tree
NR Ponytail Palm
C,oi-Tir-ron Name
Specif icotion
of room I V� 0
Spacing
Foxtail, Palm
B x B 12' - 14' OA
L bber ho
U
4t gauge W!
Sol,
0.r—
Nora Grant Ixora
3 qol., 24" x 24''
V 10 rd 41k
Sol,
O.C.
Parwriii Juniper
3 gol., 12" x 15''
Finish gra
30"
Purple Lantana
I qol.i/ 12'' Ht. x
12 ''
S P r4� "
L
Golden Lantana
I got./ 12" ht. x
12''
spr;�"
Giant Liriope
1 12" ht. x
12''
epr+ "
Ugustrurn Tree
B, ht x 81 5 P r-.
2 1/2'' Col.
Oleander Standards
8' ht 4' spr, 2" cal.
Z
0
10
Pink Dwarf Oleander-
3 qol 1, 24' ht. x
24'
spr-30"
0-c-
Podocorpus
I
3 cjol 24" Ht. x
24"
spr-3C)''
0-c--
Live Oak
144 —IG'i ht. x S, spr./
31, Col,
Indian Hawthorn
ht. x
is',
Spr-3011
O.C.
Cabbage Palm
In-, —,iG, c.-7.
iol
Var. Confederate -ja5rinine
3 got., 12'' x
Silver Buttonwood
3 got., i 24" x 24"
PRO Pygmy Dote Palm
QV Live Oak
SP Cabbage Palm
NR Noshingtonio Palm
%0
0
0
2" r-lutr- 0 0
r00M 11
Mkj��A kVj�NMjjL=
FERTILIZATON
Shrubs and Trees
All trees and shrLb5 shall be fertilized with "Agriform"20-15-15 planting tablets of time of planting and prior to
installation of plant pit backfill, Tablets shall be placed uniformly around the root ball at a depth that is between
the middle and bottom of the root balL
Application Rate
of room I V� 0
1- 21 gram tablet
#Ve fig p i
0
L bber ho
U
4t gauge W!
3 - 21 gram tablets
211 UIC
4 - 21 gram tablets
Trees:
V 10 rd 41k
3" Tree
7�
Finish gra
>
2x4 pt sto V,
Root b
51* dye i
9ve 91 1
L
TREE PL-AINTING.
DETAIL
%0
0
0
2" r-lutr- 0 0
r00M 11
Mkj��A kVj�NMjjL=
FERTILIZATON
Shrubs and Trees
All trees and shrLb5 shall be fertilized with "Agriform"20-15-15 planting tablets of time of planting and prior to
installation of plant pit backfill, Tablets shall be placed uniformly around the root ball at a depth that is between
the middle and bottom of the root balL
Application Rate
I Gallon Container,
1- 21 gram tablet
3 Gallon Container.
2 - 21 gram tablets
5 Gallon Container:
3 - 21 gram tablets
1 Gallon Container:
4 - 21 gram tablets
Trees:
3 tablets per each Ill' caliper of trunk
Groundcover Areas
All qroindcover areas shall receive fertilization with '0zmocote" time release fertilizer per monacicturer's
specil"icatilons,
FOR HATER VIEW. ALL SHRUBS TO BE
MAINTAINED UNDER 3Q" NT,
11
on
■
I
Its!
a
1�1
JN
>
C)
C)
LL
7�
>
L
Ln
W
1�1
JN
>
1�1
JN
(lJ2,11
W
:4
Ljj
P 1�
Z
0
10
Rol,
F-
III)r,
uj q
r:
".11
U) [,,j
L
ff
Ull
LL
ra
QS
cm
ti a
LN
00
Qw
W
dam_ t
dJ
L,N MB
BASIS OF FIELD BEARINGS
S? METAL s 2'NIETAL c LAY
OVERHFAD
81r,'IAL PIPE PIPE P:,'E GAS L ME E-A'S)TERLY Rl(-JH-F-0E--W,-f\,Y LINF-'
TRAFFIC lNrq. 0--l. = I 3j, IVA FLR NV, ELEV.. t33' WMETAL AV. ELE�,/. u,-x VJA-rp kVArE:R
/,-"LIIIES i7'hiETAL PIPE -7 VALVE VAL'VE
V- VALVE 12'ME-rAL C�AS
7-7 FIIPE--
A PIPE 'VALVE
Sl ORM
S�,N mfi INV. ELEV, 1 39' micm A — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
IVATER
/STORM WNTER 17ME7AL H
i 1 VALVE
VAYVE HAMDE�
DRAN p I
12l, METAL 7,
PIPE. N 57 -----4 T
ASPHAi,' -P Mow
16" Cf-Nl�A-ltl�
IWI Ed
Ev 6(FR(G(jF-WAY
WATER—j STORM*' 56 54 53
CONC, P08TS U �W FY PIPE IN F -!
TPAPF;c VE ELEC� t,,ETEr4-- -BOXES sp sp sp sp sp
POE MA 1,14 DRAIN -\ , 19
.1 � I=- I r, 1311 clr"�'. -INV. ELEV. 0-
1ELFCOV-i/
POLE --16"Cl MIATE-F N.1234'30"E.(L) 21727' )I(C)
A
b,'kCkFLCYvV M IN
VALVES
P CURB
a VCP S LV, "If/fEV-
(3A S L INE'
HARBOR V11--:W
GRANDE
A CONDOARNIUM
MOTRECORDED
M, �l
0
LMSEC,k, WOOL) DUCK
sl�M
C L E A R WA TER H A R B 0 R
Lam
Plni-14- KAn4-,c=,t-in1=
I I 1 4.• 1 V I T—A 4, %-01 1 a C14 1 —.0 %—.01 %—.1 1 1 1 t—f I
Quantity Code Botanical Name
5
COV
Croton spp.
92
M113
Mlbl-5CU5 5pp.
2
UP
11ex Vomitoria Pendulla
G(5
IX
Ixora Nora Grant
114
LAM
Lantana 5pp.
2
LM G
briope Mu5can
301$0.0.
LJT
U,-3u5trum spp.
3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" -5pr.
N05
Nenum oleander
174
POM
Fociocarpu5 -5pp.
40
P5
Philodendron 5ellOUM
90
N
Nerium oleander "dwarf pink''
35
P11
Raphiolepi5 inclica
2G
SP
5abal palmetto
ANY CHANGES IN SPECIES, SPECIFICAVONS, OR
DESIGN WTHOUTT F CONSENT OF THE PLANNING
DIRECTOR RENDERS PLAN APPROVAL VOID.
5pecification
Spacing
3 gal., 24" x 24"
3011 OZ.
3 gal, 24" x 24"
3011 O.C.
12- l 4' ht. x 5' 5pr., 2 1/2" cal.
3 gal., 24" x 24"
3011 O.C.
I gal- 12" ht. x 12" Epr.
1811 O.C.
I gal, 12" ht. x I 2" Apr.
1811 O.C.
&ht. x 8' 5pr., 2 112" cal.
B
&ht. x 5t 5pr,, 2 112" cal.
grade 0 ®
3 gal,, 24" ht. x 24" 5pr.
301$0.0.
3 gal., 24" x 24"
30" o.c.
3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" -5pr.
3011 O.C.
3 gal., 15" ht. x 15" 5pr.
3011 O.C.
C.T. a5 noted on plan
10, o.c.
Ott x.°86 I " I J
I I C A I I t v , I V I CA I I CA 1 1
Code
Common Name
Code
Common Name
AP
Arer-a Palm
NO
Oleander
AP,O
Queen Palm
N
Dwarf Pink Oleander
B
Banana
grade 0 ®
EX15TING PLANT CODE
00
>
NR
Ponytail Palm EX15TING PLANT
COV
Croton
OY
Oy,5ter Plant 5YME30L
C U
Sea Grape,
PA
a.
Plumbac3o
CV
Bottlebru5h
PP
Papyrus
fB,
ficu5 Tree
P5
Philodendron
1-1113
Hlbl5cus
P P10
Py&jmy Date Palm
IV5
Dwarf Yaupon Holly
PTV
Var. Pitto5porum
Ix
Nora Grant Ixora
QV
Live Oak
LAM
Lantana
KI
Indian Hawthorn
UT
bc3u5trum Tree
5P
Cabbage Palm
LMG
Giant briope
5K
Bird of Paradise
P
Poaocarpu5
WK
Wa5hingtonia Palm
Yf-
Yucca
U SITE VISIE31LITY TRIANGLES (TYP )
ALL 5HRUDS, TO DE MAINTAINED
UNDER 30" HT.
Trim all 5hrubs to maxi
1 11 ht. of 30" in clear zone.
k5C3
35-1
Remove —
cxi5tin 3 curb
F-3--]
PARKING LOT TO BE TURM
OTHER LANDSCMING
51TE V1515ILITYTRIANGLES, (TYP.)
ALL SHRUB5 TO 13E MAINTAINED
UNDER 30" HT.
r—Trim all 5hrub5 to a maximum
I ) ht. of 30" in clear zone.
IN
N.
I
4-0011111111111
Exi5tine,3 tree, to
remain
11
I
Set tree plumb,
f 0
with top of 0
0
rootbail 1 112"
V)
0
above fini5h
ae=
grade 0 ®
00
>
Rubber ho5e
Z
L-
# 12 gauge wire
rN
0
0
2" Mulch
U—
12" length red
3" Tree well
pla5tic flag
firi5h grade
E4-J
tv
tape-
2x4 pt 5take
r:
EXi5tin(,j native
Root ball
Lu
W
soil
Native
backfill
K I C: 0 AI I A K I r"N r-' /-% A M 1= K I /-N-r C: f"
W&WINW11410talm WITRIVIRWILWIMIEWWWARM
Groundcover ArCa51
All Iroundcover areas Shall receive fertilization with "Ozmocote" time release fertilizer per manufacturer`5
5pecificatfon5.
M11
116
Of
0
LO
ZM0
LWIJ
Z Z
X of
•
OWW
U) U)
W Ui
F- I--
U) (1)
MWW
in In
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTS
1666 Laney Drive
Palm Harbor, Florida 34683
Phone 727 787-2840
Fax 727 785-4017
Landscape Architecture
Site Planning
Construction Management
0
V)
Liu
ae=
LIJ
>
it
Z
L-
rN
0
0
U—
E4-J
tv
M
r:
Lu
Ln
CZ
0)
1i 8 a
Imp,(3
�O E
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTS
1666 Laney Drive
Palm Harbor, Florida 34683
Phone 727 787-2840
Fax 727 785-4017
Landscape Architecture
Site Planning
Construction Management
0
V)
Liu
ae=
LIJ
>
it
Z
L-
rN
0
0
U—
E4-J
tv
M
r:
Lu
Ln
CZ
0)
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTS
1666 Laney Drive
Palm Harbor, Florida 34683
Phone 727 787-2840
Fax 727 785-4017
Landscape Architecture
Site Planning
Construction Management
0
Lc)
0
1.0
0
V)
Lf)
(D
0
CN
1-1
UD
i.
0
0
q)
Lr)
0
to
0
Q)
;t-_
V)
0,
q)
U)
(7)
V)
0
C)
0
Lf)
0
0
z
PHASE 11 ----r—PHASE I
SAN MI I
BASIS OF FIELD BEARINGS
NEW DOGHOUSE 6"CLAY
1, EASTERLY RIGHT— —WAY LINE
SW Y.H. Go N IVE
12" N1171AI VAt AL% I
'IRM R SIONAL LY� / /1,"' 4," %111, 1 IN IN\ All -R
.7+ \VA 11'
Vr 12"NIFIAL INV ELEV =
----- — -------------------------- I. " V
INV. ELEV, WAI I R INV. I'L RIM ELM
�\ 9 V""t, I�E VAIA 1:
LINF1 ;�>! I. GAS
1,jv 1�1 �zk r I t1l, nn' -C)F-Z� -L-
HARBOR VIEW GRAND
E
A CONDOMINIUAl
NOTRECORDED
WATER CONNECTIONDETAIL
NTS
STORMSTRUCTURE4 TABLE4
nyzl� / I
yd
2
1
PAIAI
EX POW RRIC. 9-
TO REM41} B07.
�5
—2-5
TYPE A "C' INLET
FDT INDEX 2J2
UNKNOWN
%
PE "C" INLET
7 _Y
FDAT INDEX 2J2
PIPE THRU W,
. ," WATER T7GHT)
TYPE "C" INLET
F D. 0. T INDEX 2J2
PIPE THRU WALL
7P
;(MORTAR WATER T7
S I trtta, DRAIN
TL CONI
Im .
4.1
3z,
.1-1. /
BA
S,
-
HARBOR VIEW GRAND
E
A CONDOMINIUAl
NOTRECORDED
WATER CONNECTIONDETAIL
NTS
STORMSTRUCTURE4 TABLE4
STORMPYE SUMDULE
PAIAI
OAK
TYPE A "C' INLET
FDT INDEX 2J2
UNKNOWN
PE "C" INLET
7 _Y
FDAT INDEX 2J2
PIPE THRU W,
. ," WATER T7GHT)
TYPE "C" INLET
F D. 0. T INDEX 2J2
PIPE THRU WALL
;(MORTAR WATER T7
C L E A R W A T E R
LEGEND
STORMPYE SUMDULE
PAIAI
OAK
0
UNKNOWN
C L E A R W A T E R
LEGEND
- TREES
PAIAI
OAK
0
UNKNOWN
170.00' (P1
170.02'(A,I)
I
RJR,
FIL, i site]
RAM A. GOEL, MD., P.E. #47431 'Jun b
COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VAUD UNLESS
EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SE&L
t