311 GULFVIEW BLVD STree Inventory
Britts Cafe /Surf Style
201 S. Gulfview Boulevard
Clearwater, Florida
Prepared by Alan Mayberry
For: Keith Zayac & Associates Inc.
July 6, 2009
The following report is submitted by Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist, and includes
findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in
the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and
my report is factual and unbiased.
Tree Inventory Data
A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a
valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could
lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four
codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the data used in
the inventory:
Tree# - location - Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that
corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the
field.
Size — Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If
there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area
below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of clear trunk (C.T.).
Species — Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in
the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter.
Condition Rating — The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural
strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities,
decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and
attachments, i.e., well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the
trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included
bark.
Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net
photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health
f
V /
i
G
0
Old
S V'
Y'
CIO
0
will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree
as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating
include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2)
crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the
tree is making and storing energy.
The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any
unique features. The rating scale is 0 -6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen.
Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as
follows;
0- A dead tree
1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease
or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1
ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). A tree with a rating
of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury
or property damage.
2 — A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with included
bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback,
cracked/split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low
energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies
or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s)
can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable
amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating.
3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be
corrected with moderate maintenance.. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal
area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon
have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average
appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible.
4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems
that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive
appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree
should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees
exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can
be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic
amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the property and
should be preserved.
5 — A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health
and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this
category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in
this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity
2
and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value
to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is
worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation.
6 — A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior
qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown
ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness.
A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures
that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an
undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an
experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified
Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree.
Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not
covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may
include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It
may also have recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree.
NOTE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3 -5 years. However, events such as
drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance and
severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial
maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely
affected, have the tree inspected by a qualified International Society of
Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist.
Note: Whenever possible it is advised to adhere to inventory recommendations when
selecting trees to be preserved. For example, trees or palms rated 4.0 and higher should
be preserved if at all possible, while trees or palms rated 2.0 and lower should be
removed unless otherwise noted in the inventory. Trees or palms rated 2.5 are generally
recommended for removal unless remedial work is performed to upgrade them. Trees or
palms rated 3.0 and 3.5 are average trees that have good potential and warrant serious
consideration for preservation but not to the extent that site plan modifications are
necessary.
This tree inventory was conducted on July 4, 2009.
NOTE #1: Tree noted as off -site in the inventory indicate trees that are on adjacent
properties within 25' of the property line. These trees are included in the inventory per
City of Clearwater code.
NOTE #2: Trees noted as right of way trees are located in the street right of way adjacent
to the site.
3
Tree Inventory
Tree # Size
Species
Rating
1 14' C.T.
sabal palm (Sabal palmetto)
3.5
2 12' C.T..
sabal palm
3.0
3 14' C.T.
sabal palm
3.0
4 12' C.T..
sabal palm
3.0
5 4 ", 4" .
strangler fig (Ficus aurea)
1.0
Comments: The strangler fig is a native tree that begins
its life as an epiphyte in a host
tree and ends up overtaking the host and can become a massive tree. They are unique but
are not desirable in
confined sites. Recommend removal to preserve the host, palm #4.
6 10' C.T.
sabal palm
3.0
7 12' C.T.
sabal palm
3.5
8 multi -stem.
Arbor vitae (Thuja occidentalis)
3.5
9 6"
Italian cypress (Cupressus sempervirens) 2.0
10 multi -stem
arbor vitae
2.5
11 multi -stem
arbor vitae
2.5
12 14' C.T.
sabal palm
4.5
13 12' C.T.
sabal palm
4.0
14 10' C.T
sabal palm
4.0
Comment: In right of way
15 10' C.T
sabal palm
4.0
Comment: In right of way
16 6"
live oak (Quercus virginiana)
2.0
4
I
v
This tree was topped V above grade which produced three codominant trunks.
17
13' C.T.
sabal palm
3.5
18
13' C.T..
sabal palm
3.5
19
14' C.T.
sabal palm
3.5
20
6"
live oak
2.5
Comments: This tree is very healthy but has been previously topped. The structure could
be restored through structural pruning.
21 10' C.T. Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta)
4.0
22 12' C.T. sabal palm
3.5
23 11' C.T. sabal palm
4.0
24 12' C.T. sabal palm
3.5
NOTE: Trees #25 - #27 are located off -site on abutting property to the north.
25 16' C.T. sabal palm
4.0
26 11' C.T. sabal palm
3.5
27 15' C.T. sabal palm
3.5
NOTE: Trees #28 — #31 are located off -site on abutting property to the south.
28 15' C.T. sabal palm
3.0
Comments: Over - pruned
29 14' C.T. sabal palm
3.0
Comments: Over - pruned
30 11" carrot wood (Cupaniopsis anacardioides)
2.0
31 5" Carrot wood
2.0
Comments: This tree is growing from the base of a concrete wall that separates the
properties.
5
I
Cli
Ci
us
es
cs
et
n.
2
P
ALA land.tcaping use be properly
installed per approved plan pilor
0 A TWEEN CLEAN C QUIN�_R_OCK_8�
rc I 0 to CO inspeon
BUILDING NORTH PR'P�rPERTY Ins ,
cti
Re! pecto fme cue MM Ri LINE I5 BE PROTEPT
I L
IDSCAPG ED
A LAN IN TO I
IIIFROM VEHICUIAR OR PEDES131AN
TRAFFIC BY A MINIMUM SIX INCH
IHIGH CURBING AND WHEEL STOPS
I7777=HE) DR 20 R I PR
C A ROCK- B ET WE E (R k LEAN LLF
7 — /2' ZONE R, (fit WB ��L R A ND
R !L"I AROUPD FDC'aa'ONNECTION,p 3 4 II M �rH D L I
A e y- /4 L
<
J Co
P.
L 1 IHD tR1 IL Vi I I �Hf) It"RI 0 2 IT I HP, t5 DR jr rp 6D R, R �[-� 25 -77 tIDR I�Rl IWR 49-. IH D w 15 3 L5\ R GENERAL LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION NOT E:
d. 'APING AND IRRIGAT ION WITHIN S. GULFVIEVV BLVD. MUST MEET
AH LANDSC
1 5 rFS OF THE CITY (CON I ACT TIM KURTZ, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
REQUIREMENTS DR N AT 727-562-47371, PRIOR TO PLANTING OR INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM
38
I
01 20
GRAPHIC SCALE
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
PR ®PQSED BUILDING
I N ORDE M E M NI H .
ti
7, IPROPOSED D
. 1
ten, t47
WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA
PHOENIX ROBELENII
WODYEFTIA BIFURCATA
LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA
SHRUBS
I LANT LIST
COMMON NAME
MEXICAN WASHINGTON PALM
PYGMY DATE PALM
FOXTAIL PALM
CREPE MYRTLE
SR 5 STRELITZIA REGINAE BIRD OF PARADISE
P
RI 45 RAPHIOLEPIS INDICA INDIA HAWTHORN
0
go
LM LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS PURPLE LANTANA
VS 74 VIBURNUM SUSPENSUM SANDANKWA VIBURNUM
HO 95 HELIANTHUS DEBILIS DUNE SUNFLOWER
DR 98 dS DURANTA REPENS GOLDEN DEWDROP
;
a
PM PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLIJi PODOCARPUS
To
j
l e. n , cape plant material shall be installed in any Visibility Mangle
that is greater than 30 inches and less than 8 feet in height
SIZE- REQUIREMENTS
39 C.T.H. MIN.
(1) TRIPLES & (3) SINGLES; 10'-17 HT.
(3) TRIPLES & (4) SINGLES; 10'-I2' HT.
21/2" CAL. (8I HT)
7 GAL-, FULL
3 GAL., (24- O.C. SPACING)
3 GAL., (24!' O.C. SPACING)
3 GAL., (24!'O.C. SPACING)
I GAL, (IS- O.C. SPACING)
3 GAL., (24- O.C. SPACING)
3 GAL., (24" O.C. SPACING)
0
0
•
SIGHT VISIBILII
WITHIN _Y TRIANGLES
------
fOR
ADJACENTT
"O'VMTER NO STRUCTURE,
LANDS CAPING MAY BE
LLJ
CL
fi
INSTALLED,
OTHERTHAN NON-OPAQUE
ca
z
FENCE
NOT EXCEEDING 36,1
IN HEIGHT
M
<
C11
L_-4
CL
=
<
0
F_
0
z
-------- ---
df
1 N G
I-0 'U
ca Uj
LLJ
fr-
-- ------- - -
,W)SCAP�i\j T FATM F
LL1 <
0
En
(n
to
W
I
m.
"NEC I E01
CAT�ON S. OR DES, ;, !
' C;ONSE� U OF T1
OU E
,V iTH
!G L ECTO
t1i
0
a-
I
Cli
Ci
us
es
cs
et
n.
2
P
ALA land.tcaping use be properly
installed per approved plan pilor
0 A TWEEN CLEAN C QUIN�_R_OCK_8�
rc I 0 to CO inspeon
BUILDING NORTH PR'P�rPERTY Ins ,
cti
Re! pecto fme cue MM Ri LINE I5 BE PROTEPT
I L
IDSCAPG ED
A LAN IN TO I
IIIFROM VEHICUIAR OR PEDES131AN
TRAFFIC BY A MINIMUM SIX INCH
IHIGH CURBING AND WHEEL STOPS
I7777=HE) DR 20 R I PR
C A ROCK- B ET WE E (R k LEAN LLF
7 — /2' ZONE R, (fit WB ��L R A ND
R !L"I AROUPD FDC'aa'ONNECTION,p 3 4 II M �rH D L I
A e y- /4 L
<
J Co
P.
L 1 IHD tR1 IL Vi I I �Hf) It"RI 0 2 IT I HP, t5 DR jr rp 6D R, R �[-� 25 -77 tIDR I�Rl IWR 49-. IH D w 15 3 L5\ R GENERAL LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION NOT E:
d. 'APING AND IRRIGAT ION WITHIN S. GULFVIEVV BLVD. MUST MEET
AH LANDSC
1 5 rFS OF THE CITY (CON I ACT TIM KURTZ, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
REQUIREMENTS DR N AT 727-562-47371, PRIOR TO PLANTING OR INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM
38
I
01 20
GRAPHIC SCALE
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
PR ®PQSED BUILDING
I N ORDE M E M NI H .
ti
7, IPROPOSED D
. 1
ten, t47
WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA
PHOENIX ROBELENII
WODYEFTIA BIFURCATA
LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA
SHRUBS
I LANT LIST
COMMON NAME
MEXICAN WASHINGTON PALM
PYGMY DATE PALM
FOXTAIL PALM
CREPE MYRTLE
SR 5 STRELITZIA REGINAE BIRD OF PARADISE
P
RI 45 RAPHIOLEPIS INDICA INDIA HAWTHORN
0
go
LM LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS PURPLE LANTANA
VS 74 VIBURNUM SUSPENSUM SANDANKWA VIBURNUM
HO 95 HELIANTHUS DEBILIS DUNE SUNFLOWER
DR 98 dS DURANTA REPENS GOLDEN DEWDROP
;
a
PM PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLIJi PODOCARPUS
To
j
l e. n , cape plant material shall be installed in any Visibility Mangle
that is greater than 30 inches and less than 8 feet in height
SIZE- REQUIREMENTS
39 C.T.H. MIN.
(1) TRIPLES & (3) SINGLES; 10'-17 HT.
(3) TRIPLES & (4) SINGLES; 10'-I2' HT.
21/2" CAL. (8I HT)
7 GAL-, FULL
3 GAL., (24- O.C. SPACING)
3 GAL., (24!' O.C. SPACING)
3 GAL., (24!'O.C. SPACING)
I GAL, (IS- O.C. SPACING)
3 GAL., (24- O.C. SPACING)
3 GAL., (24" O.C. SPACING)
e.
0
0
0
UJI
LLJ
CL
fi
ca
z
e.
0
0
0
UJI
LLJ
CL
ca
z
M
<
C11
L_-4
CL
=
<
0
F_
0
z
ca Uj
LLJ
fr-
LL1 <
0
En
(n
W
_j
t1i
0
a-
> > Z
>
LLJ
>
UJI
>
W
4=
o
0
"t
Ci
N
Mr
LO
z
vt
0 0:
M LIA
p. 2 Uj
Uj z
.50
0 Z
M
W Uj U (O zo
w
fr
Lu
w
z w
7- Z LLJ
CL LL (Mr
w <
C0 >
z PROJECT#: 785 ORGINALT DATE: 1120.09
CHECKED BY: Ss
FLOOD PROOF NOTE:
1. BUILDING SHALL BE FLOOD-PROOFED UP TOTHIE IMYEAR FLOOD DRAWN BY:
MF ELEVATION
SHEET NO,
I0 F .... .. ------------ - ------
a
9" Y.'-,en raad:vav ease is B" ti
7" When ravd:eay Lase is 6" &
:r cases.
.�3
{ NaTE:L
L� Lamp hales shall Far _ c waterproof
74 I bitarniious cow :ia on Vic exterior,
Kopper a Situmastic Etock 300M, or
Prcco EP -214.
Plug to be plcstfe with "0` ring or
VC with '0' ring.
P.14C. pipe entry requires trarsite
- arhole cau�nfinq acessary by
Schn= Mmll °3.e a, zqu" dyed
water step coupling.
M'D' Cy ;i.F-ARWA>.r_n, FLeRIDA
ENGINEERING DE PARENT
o
r�� I . _ 1 .r
T_Ga I i I m 1
DEMOLITION NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL
ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING REQUIRED PRIOR TO DEMOLITION.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING SITE WORK.
3. INSTALL SILT FENCE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
AND SHALL HAVE A BACKFILLED TRENCHED. THERE SHALL BE
NO TRENCHING WITHIN DRIP LINE OF TREE CANOPY.
4. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TREE BARRICADES PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT TO CITY STANDARDS, 2x2 POST.
W/ 1x4 RAILS AT TWO THIRDS OF EACH TREE DRIP LINE AND /OR
PARALLEL TO THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SITE.
5. THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AT APPLICANT'S EXPENSE,
WILL REMOVE/RELOCATE ANY /ALL WATER METERS,
INCLUDING RECLAIMED WATER MAINS.
6. ALL EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES WITHIN THE ADJACENT R -O -W
SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND (ALONG CORONADO).
7. ALL PROPOSED ON -SITE ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATION LINES
SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND_
SPACING OF POSTS FILTER FABRIC
TO BE 6-10 FEET APART MATERIAL
2 MIN. FOR ADDITIONAL STRENGTH
FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN
BE ATTACHED TO A 6-INCH (M
MESH WtREE SCREEN WHICH HASAX)
BACKRLLED TRENCH BEEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS
FIum FABRIC
FAS ENED TO IT ELY ATTACHING TWO SILT FENCES
POSTS OR IF USED
THE YhR£ MESH 0� 0__
APPROXIMATELY 8
INCHES OF FILTER PLACE THE END
FABRIC MATERIAL POST OF THE
MUST EXTEND INTO SECOND f c"FIC£
A TRENCH AND BE INSIDE THE END
ANCHORED 447TH POST OF THE
COMPACTED
P BACKFTLL MATERIAL FIRST FENCE
VOW OR rr..j ROTATE BOTH
Si EEL POST j.,'I POSTS AT LEAST
a :!
180 DEGREES IN
RUNOFF A I.. DIRECTION TO
CREATE A TIGHT
SEAL V07H THE
FABRIC MATERIAL
. 1
10�IINNCHES \
DIRECTION OF RUNOFF WATERS
\APPROXIMATE DRIVE BOi"
I 4-INq{ BY POSTS ABOUT 10
+� 4-TNCH TRENCH INCHES INTO THE
.. INCHES AND
V, BURY FLAP
IFLOOD PROOF NOTE:
1. t HE PROPOSED BUILDING SHALL BE FLOOD- PROOFED UP TO THE 100 -YEAR
FLOOD ELEVATION
1 TOTAL TREES TO BE REMOVED FROM
TREE NO.
RAT CT/.: H _WP-_.
#1 -3.5
LEGEND
SABAL PALM
#2 -3.0
1218"
PROPERTY LINE
#3-3.0
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LOCATION
SABAL PALM
#4-3.0
12719"
EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE TO BE
45-1.0
4 ",4"
STRANGLER FIG
REMOVED
10715"
SABAL PALM
#7 -3.5
12'
SABAL PALM
#8 -3.5
EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN Wf DRIP
ARBORVITAE
LINE, RATING & TREE BARRICADE
6"
EXISTING TREE W1 DRIP LINE
b
TO BE REMOVED
ARBOR VITAE
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
DEMOLITION NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL
ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING REQUIRED PRIOR TO DEMOLITION.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING SITE WORK.
3. INSTALL SILT FENCE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
AND SHALL HAVE A BACKFILLED TRENCHED. THERE SHALL BE
NO TRENCHING WITHIN DRIP LINE OF TREE CANOPY.
4. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TREE BARRICADES PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT TO CITY STANDARDS, 2x2 POST.
W/ 1x4 RAILS AT TWO THIRDS OF EACH TREE DRIP LINE AND /OR
PARALLEL TO THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SITE.
5. THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AT APPLICANT'S EXPENSE,
WILL REMOVE/RELOCATE ANY /ALL WATER METERS,
INCLUDING RECLAIMED WATER MAINS.
6. ALL EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES WITHIN THE ADJACENT R -O -W
SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND (ALONG CORONADO).
7. ALL PROPOSED ON -SITE ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATION LINES
SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND_
SPACING OF POSTS FILTER FABRIC
TO BE 6-10 FEET APART MATERIAL
2 MIN. FOR ADDITIONAL STRENGTH
FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN
BE ATTACHED TO A 6-INCH (M
MESH WtREE SCREEN WHICH HASAX)
BACKRLLED TRENCH BEEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS
FIum FABRIC
FAS ENED TO IT ELY ATTACHING TWO SILT FENCES
POSTS OR IF USED
THE YhR£ MESH 0� 0__
APPROXIMATELY 8
INCHES OF FILTER PLACE THE END
FABRIC MATERIAL POST OF THE
MUST EXTEND INTO SECOND f c"FIC£
A TRENCH AND BE INSIDE THE END
ANCHORED 447TH POST OF THE
COMPACTED
P BACKFTLL MATERIAL FIRST FENCE
VOW OR rr..j ROTATE BOTH
Si EEL POST j.,'I POSTS AT LEAST
a :!
180 DEGREES IN
RUNOFF A I.. DIRECTION TO
CREATE A TIGHT
SEAL V07H THE
FABRIC MATERIAL
. 1
10�IINNCHES \
DIRECTION OF RUNOFF WATERS
\APPROXIMATE DRIVE BOi"
I 4-INq{ BY POSTS ABOUT 10
+� 4-TNCH TRENCH INCHES INTO THE
.. INCHES AND
V, BURY FLAP
IFLOOD PROOF NOTE:
1. t HE PROPOSED BUILDING SHALL BE FLOOD- PROOFED UP TO THE 100 -YEAR
FLOOD ELEVATION
1 TOTAL TREES TO BE REMOVED FROM
TREE NO.
RAT CT/.: H _WP-_.
#1 -3.5
14710"
SABAL PALM
#2 -3.0
1218"
SABAL PALM
#3-3.0
1479"
SABAL PALM
#4-3.0
12719"
SABAL PALM
45-1.0
4 ",4"
STRANGLER FIG
#6-3.0
10715"
SABAL PALM
#7 -3.5
12'
SABAL PALM
#8 -3.5
MULTI
ARBORVITAE
##9 -2.0
6"
ITALIAN CYPRESS
#10 -2.5
MULTI
ARBOR VITAE
#11 -2.5
MULTI
ARBOR VITAE
#12 -4.5
1478"
SABAL PALM
##13 -4.0
12711"
SABAL PALM
#14 -4.0
10711"
SABAL PALM (RON
##15 -4.0
10712"
SABAL PALM (RON
#15 -2.0
6"
LIVE OAK
#17 -3.5
1378"
SABAL PALM
#18 -3.5
13'19"
SABAL PALM
##19 -3.5
1479"
SABAL PALM
#20 -2.5
6.
LIVE OAK
#21 -4.0
10'110"
WASHINGTON PALM
#22 -3.5
12711"
SABAL PALM
#23 -4.0
111/9"
SABAL PALM
#24 -3.5
12710"
SABAL PALM
x`26 -3.5
117101,
SABAL PALM
TOTAL PALMS TO BE
REMOVED = 216'
TOTAL TREES TO BE
REMOVED = 26"
(MULTI -ARBOR VITAE NOT INCLUDED)
MOEN
J
•n
s'
•
,.i
.,
I
I
..
rn
}
}
LIJ
S
i
}
. £ i
s
�)
c
w
5
'a
SHEET NO.
J'ti ti...O
C1