Loading...
2265-2271 GULF TO BAY BLVDbcp2009-10244 CITY OF CLEARWATER - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Z? y Aij v. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NAME OF OWNER SITE ADDRESS 2 - 22 -7 PHONE 72 %7- ' 0 6Q OWNER'S ADDRESS LOCATION OF TREE(S) ON LOT f.G` SPECIES AND NUMBER OF TREE(S) TO APPLICANT: A non - refundable of $ be removed, plus $3.00 foi removed is required. =L' Q*Ar R FOR REMOVAL: kconstruction •See "A" below • Hazardous • Declining ❑ Dead ❑ Other (Specify) A) CONSTRUCTION Li L3 - _ 1. For new construction, additions or other mod Icati rQn,��_ a site plan is required. This site plan must have a site plan must include: a. Major Changes of Grade f. Proposed Number of Parking Spaces b. Structure Locations g. Proposed Underground Utilities c, Driveways and Walks h. Zoning Setbacks d. Parking Arrangement i. All easements and Rights -of -Way e. Required Number of Parking Spaces Fee Recd. $ Date the removal of a protected tree(s), mile lots, or 1 " -50' for all others. The j. All Protected Trees Including: (i.) Diameter of 4.5' above grade (DBH) (ii.) Surveyed Location (iii.) Species (iv.) Diseased or Insect Infested Trees k. Tree Barricade Detail & Locations i. b O 2. Protective barriers are required around all trees remaining on site during construction. These barricades must remain intact during construction. The barriers must meet City Specifications. B) REPLACEMENTS D 1. Tree replacement minimum standards: 10' overall height, 2.5" caliper, Florida Grade #1. See inspectors note below to -' determine the number of replacement trees required. Replacements required within 30 days. v I hereby certify that as property owner or as representative of the property owner, I have verified that the tree(s) sought D to be removed is wholly on property owned by the above - identified property owner, and should it be determined that 0 the tree re located wholly or partially on property owned by some other person, then, I agree to hold the City of Clearw ter armless in any claim made for wrongful removal of such tree(s). I hereby certify that this application together vJlti i ,y pl- �S Subs i iiiied iS a +'Y'e repreSei �fatiai of aii faCIJ concerning Ali �g tl IG� proposed lei I IVVal al ti Ie Iles. (J). AI ly deVlUllal I fr he rmit iss sh der it II and void and be considered a violation of the Community Development Code. ' S' nature of owner or a plicant Printed Name Address Agency Represen ' g OCL # J,d �s�°,�itiftS G 3�d 7 y3 2 - 0 27 City State Zip Phone /Cell Fax DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - Not Valid Until Signed By City Manager or his Designated Agent Inspecto's Cory) ments: RG{uire¢[2eplacement Trees: U f/, Applicable Code Section:, Based on the Inspector's comments and information submitted, the above removal application is: ❑ Approved as Submitted AApproved- Modified as Noted Above ❑ Denied Signed: Date: 10 Community evelopmen Coordinator or Designee /Inspector Valid for six months from the date of issuance. 1362.0001 -GC White - Planning & Development Services Yellow - Applicant Rev. 2-03 Tree Inventory -- gE s 0"1_y c0 iUC -e2 Gulf - to - Bay Plaza S u$s�, -r Pte, 0,EAry , a� Clearwater, Florida -4 i aH - '+ 3s— Prepared by Alan Mayberry November 15, 2005 For: RMC Development LLC The following report is submitted by Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist, and includes findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and my report is factual and unbiased. This report is the property of RMC Development LLC and will not be given to other entities unless so directed. Site Overview and Tree Canopy Analysis The subject site is commercial property located in Clearwater. The site consists of trees planted to meet landscape requirements that are growing in landscape islands within parking lots or in landscape buffers adjacent to parking lots_ The tree canopy is comprised primarily of two native shade tree species: the live oak (Quercus virginiana) and the winged elm (Ulmus alata). In addition, the site supports a quantity of the exotic crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) tree, and a few additional tree and palm species. The trees and palms in general are suffering from poor overall maintenance, insufficient irrigation and compacted soil conditions. The winged elms in particular have been adversely affected from improper pruning practices such as topping and rounding over, which have caused serious structural problems in these trees. Consequently, the majority of the elms have been downgraded and recommended for removal. A large percentage of the live oak trees also have structural issues and are recommended for removal. The opportunity for tree preservation at this site is limited to a relatively small percentage of trees that are structurally sound and systemically healthy. The inventory identifies several trees that have minor structural problems but are otherwise healthy and could be preserved per the remedial measures defined in the comments section for the individual trees. Trees in this category should not be preserved if the remedial work will not be performed. As trees and people will closely interface on this site it is paramount that the site trees have good structure. A second problem facing the site trees is their locations relative to space issues such as growing in or around small landscape areas, adjacent structures, overhead utility wires, billboards etc. Tree preservation options are limited at this site and the best strategy may be to plant new trees with good structure and species characteristics and ensure that they have sufficient space and are maintained properly. Following this overview is an explanation of the terms and codes used in the tree inventory and then the actual inventory which will rate the individual trees. Please pay attention to the site notes within the inventory as they contain specific information to assist the development team with the site design in regards to tree preservation. NOTE: This inventory will include an addendum that will breakdown the number of trees (converted to diameter inches) that have a condition rating of 3.0 or above (considered worthy of preservation and requiring mitigation) and the number of trees that have a condition rating of 2.5 or less and do not require mitigation. This information can be used in designing a landscape plan that meets the City's tree replacement requirements. Tree Inventory Data A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the data used in the inventory: Tree# - location - Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the field. Size — Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of clear trunk (C.T.). Species — Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter. Condition Rating — The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments, i.e., well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included bark. Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2) crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the tree is making and storing energy. The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0 -6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as follows: V 0- A dead tree 1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category 41 ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). A tree with a rating of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage. 2 — A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with included bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback, cracked/split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s) can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating. 3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible. 4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the property and should be preserved. 5 — A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation. 6 — A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness. A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an 3 experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree. Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It may also have recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree. NOTE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3 -5 years. However, events such as drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance and severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely affected, have the tree inspected by a qualified International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist. Note: Whenever possible it is advised to adhere to inventory recommendations when selecting trees to be preserved. For example, trees rated 4.0 and higher should be preserved if at all possible, while trees rated 2.0 and lower should be removed unless otherwise noted in the inventory. Trees rated 2.5 are generally recommended for removal unless remedial work is performed to upgrade them. Trees rated 3.0 and 3.5 are average trees that have good potential and warrant serious consideration for preservation but not to the extent that site plan modifications are necessary. This tree inventory was conducted on November 15 & 16, 2005. The weather was clear with good visibility. The leaves were beginning to fall on some of the winged elm trees consequently their systemic health was judged by inspection of the stems. The remainder of the species had not started leaf senescence. Per City of Clearwater requirements the tree inventory will provide specific information in the comments section as justification for each tree with an overall condition rating of 2.5 or below. In addition, trees rated 3.0 and higher may also have specific comments to assist the development team in their decision making process. Tree Inventory Tree # Size Species Rating 1 13" live oak (Quercus virginiana) 3.0 2 16" live oak 3.0 3 16" live oak 2.0 117 7" winged elm 2.0 Comments: This tree forms a codominant trunk 18" above grade and indicates internal fracture. The upper crown structure is below average. Recommend removal. 118 9" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree develops four scaffold branches emanating from the same area 011 the trunk. Two of the codominant branches are included and there is a wire embedded in one of the crotches. The tree has been topped previously and the overall structure is very poor. Recommend removal. 119 7" winged elm 2.0 Comments: This tree forms a severally included codominant trunk 3' above grade. 5.5' above grade the tree develops three more codominant stems. This tree has suffered from poor pruning in the form of flush cuts and stub cuts. The form and live crown ratio are below average. Recommend removal. 120 9" winged elm 2.5 Comments: This tree develops a severally included codominant trunk 4.5' above grade. The crotch is displaying the swellings on each end that indicate internal fracture. The tree is leaning and is slightly mounded at the root collar. The eastern trunk forks into two codominant branches that have included bark. The crown has good form and high live crown ratio but the tree is recommended for removal due to poor structure. 121 7" winged elm 3.0 NOTE: Trees # 122 -134 are part of an annexed property and as such reflect different maintenance patterns. The pruning performed on these trees exhibit a higher standard of professional treecare. 122 12' C.T. queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana) 3.0 Comments: This palm is systemically healthy but may not warrant preservation due to scarring on the trunk. 123' 20' C.T. queen palm 2.0 Comments: This palm develops a trunk restriction 14' above grade. In addition, the bark has sloughed off from most of the trunk in the first 7' of the trunk and has diminished any aesthetic value. Recommend removal. 124 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 125 26" live oak 4.0 Comments: This tree has very good structure in the trunk and throughout the crown and has very good systemic health as indicated by vigorous shoot growth at the branch tips. The live crown ratio is only average due to extensive pruning to accommodate this tree to vehicular traffic and the former mobile homes. The pruning reflects proper cuts and professional maintenance. This tree is very worthy of preservation. Allow as much undisturbed rooting area as possible, preferably equal to the tree's dripline (outermost branch spread). 126 36" live oak 4.5 Comments: This tree has exceptional structure and systemic health. The trunk forms two large scaffold branches 7' above grade but the crotch is u- shaped with connective tissue present. A large branch was removed 8' above grade but it was a correct collar cut and the tree will compartmentalize the wound. The live crown ratio is high and the tree is showing vigorous growth at the tips, mostly likely due to the extensive rooting area available. The form is good and this tree lends high aesthetic value to the property. This tree should be preserved if at all possible. If preserved, allow as much undisturbed rooting area as possible, preferably equal to the tree's dripline. 127 35' C.T. Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta) 4.5 Comments: Recommend preservation in place or relocation on site. 128 23" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree is located on or within a foot of the east property line. The tree has a large wire running through the center of the crown and it appears to be lying on a lateral branch. The branch that it is laying on grows to the southeast and onto the roof and wall of an adjacent building. This entire large branch could be removed and it would solve the wire problem and the interference with the building. A second solution would be to relocate the wire or place a wrap on the wire to protect both the wire and the branch. This tree is border line as to whether it should be preserved. The crown is irregular due to the pruning to accommodate the wire. The structure is below average but the live crown ratio is very good. however, as it is growing on the property line it likely will end up in a landscape buffer. This tree could be incorporated into the site design; however it will need maintenance to solve the wire issue. NOTE: The tree survey shows a palm south of tree #128, but it has less than 10' of clear trunk and is not protected by city code. 129 32" live oak 3.0 Comment: This tree forks into three trunks 4' above grade. Both crotches are included and displaying early signs of internal fracture as there is slight swelling on the outside of the crotch. This is the type of codominant attachment that can lead to failure in live oak trees. The live crown ratio and the upper crown structure are good. The form is beautiful as the tree has a wide- spreading picturesque crown. This tree is young and healthy and could evolve into a signature landscape centerpiece if maintained properly. If preserved this tree should be cabled and braced to ensure structural stability. It is warranted given the aesthetic amenities that this tree will impart to the site. 130 24" Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) 0.0 Comments: This tree is a noxious exotic species that is on the category one list of the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council list. It is against the law in the City of Clearwater to plant this tree and state law requires its removal in new developments. Removal is mandatory. Note: The site plan shows a palm tree existing to the west of tree #130 but it has less than 10' of clear trunk and is not protected by city code. 131 11" laurel oak 3.0 Comments: This tree is an exceptional tree except for a codominant leader 10' above grade. This codominant could easily be corrected through subordinate pruning. Recommend preservation. 132 5" golden rain (Koelreuteria paniculata) 2.0 Comments: This tree has a sparse crown and the scaffold branch on the north side is dead. Recommend removal. 133 38" laurel oak 3.0 Comments: This tree appears to be a hybrid laurel /water oak. It is a mature tree with an attractive form as it displays a large rounded symmetrical canopy. The live crown ratio and overall structure are slightly above average. The tree has several large scaffold branches emanating from the same general area of the trunk but they do not appear to be in jeopardy of failing. The tree has an open cavity on the west side of the trunk 6' above grade that is 1' high by 10" wide. It is not causing serious structural problems. On the north side at the base there is a cavity that extends into the tree about 2'. This type of cavity is a concern. The decay is not serious now, but it is progressive and will undermine the tree's stability in the future. The tree also has some trunk cankers but they are not serious. The systemic health is average. The tip growth is minimal and the canopy slightly thinning which in indicative of the onset of old age. This tree is ready to begin the mortality spiral common to water or laurel oak trees of this age. They typically reach an age of about 65 years in urban areas. In its current condition it is worthy of preservation. However, this tree as noted is entering an irreversible health decline stage of its life which will be accelerated by any impact from the proposed development. And as its root system covers such a vast area, impacts are inevitable. Consequently, this tree is not recommended for preservation. The site would be better served to preserve the higher rated live oak trees which can live up to 300 years and are more able to withstand construction impacts. 134 31" live oak 2.5 Comments: This tree iS downgraded due to very poor structure. The trunk has a codominant beginning at 1' above grade that is included for 3'. The crotch is displaying the swelling around the crotch that indicates internal fracture. This type of basal codominant is prone to fail when the tree becomes large however; it could be stabilized with cabling and bracing procedures. The upper crown structure, form and live crown ratio is very good. If secured by cabling and bracing this tree could evolve into a beautiful tree, otherwise removal is recommended due to poor structure. 135 19" live oak 3.0 Comments: This tree has a utility pole 7' west of the trunk and a rack of wires are running north and south and east through the crown of this tree. The crown has been pruned considerably due to the presence of the wires and will have to be pruned in the future if the wires stay. The structure and systemic health are good. The form has suffered due to the pruning and the crown is somewhat irregular. If the wires will be relocated as part of the new development then this tree could be preserved and it will- evolve into a good tree with proper pruning. If the wires will stay removal is recommended. * 5 1l 3/23/2010 q Receipt #: 1201000000000002094 3:39:54PM _ �� Date: 03 /23/2010 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid BCP2009 -10244 Tree Fund 018199970351101000 2,160.00 Line Item Total: $2,160.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check ELLIS AND CO LTD R_D 2294 In Person 2,160.00 Payment Total: $2,160.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. CRCCCiP1.1nt Page 1 of I REMOVE ABANDONED SANITARY SEWER , MANHOLE SILT FENCE (TYP) SPACING OF POSTS FILTER FABRI TO BE 6-10 FEET APART WATETIAL "PLUG EXISTING FOR ADDITIONAL STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN BE ATTACHED TO A 6-INCH (MA MESH VARE SCREEN MICH HAS BACKFILLED TRENCH BEEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS r. FILTER FABRIC M"R M[Romoo Run 777 MATERIAL SECURELY FASTENED TO THE ATTACHING TWO SILT v ........ . ....... POSTS OR IF USED NOV 0 5 2009 LNECI THE WIRE MESH CONTRACTOR TO E 'X T REMO v Eij z EROSION CONTROL MEASURES NOTE: APPROXIMATELY 8 DETERMIN E L❑CATf❑N "'_AH N Of' INCHES OF FILTER B A R R 1 A 1,) "E-3 WL" PLACE THE END FABRIC MATERIAL mss C"P� Ef", By Cl AP .... ... .... 4D 4 A? 4, 4 POST OF THE AIG-1 NV ERT"OF"' MUST EXTEND INTO SECOND FENCE N A TRENCH AND BE ANCHORED WITH INSIDE THE END EXISTING SANIT Y ( /AN RE"IL", IN b, IPENAL N 'I POST OF THE FIRST FENCE PER N SEE L; SJ k,7 0s. %: S 'H f-'-Al- i I RING W K,' VK" a. BACKFILL MATERIAL R;11 UB RIOR 0 kNY Tb' N. WOOD OR ....,CONSTRUCTI, ........... �4 Q0 --.,.,INGRESS & EGRESS STEEL POST ..... .... W w CL :: EASEM T BOOK RUNOFF A CLOCKWISE co ... ..... PAGE 2533 DIRECTION TO F- F- > z CREATE A TIGHT IZ) 0 E-4 SEAL WITH THE W m cr w W CONTRACTOR TO .. .. ....... . ...... .. FABRIC MATERIAL IN //1 xl� 0 1 / 1 DIRECTION OF RUNOFF WATERS REFER TO IRE 'N 10 INCHES N \x :0 (MIN) PRESERVWTION A AY APPROXIMATE DRIVE BOTH `-SHEEJ/tA FOR POSTS ABOUT 10 INCHES INTO THE 13 4—INCH TRENCH GROUND AND FtrER DETAILS BURY FLAP o TEMPORARY SILT FENCE DETAIL TREE/ BAE RICADE (TYP)—\ CD O 0 REMOVE ABANDONED SANITARY SEWER , MANHOLE SILT FENCE (TYP) SPACING OF POSTS FILTER FABRI TO BE 6-10 FEET APART WATETIAL "PLUG EXISTING FOR ADDITIONAL STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN BE ATTACHED TO A 6-INCH (MA MESH VARE SCREEN MICH HAS BACKFILLED TRENCH BEEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS r. FILTER FABRIC M"R M[Romoo Run Type MATERIAL SECURELY FASTENED TO THE ATTACHING TWO SILT FENCES ........ . ....... POSTS OR IF USED NOV 0 5 2009 LNECI THE WIRE MESH 0- E 'X T REMO v Eij z EROSION CONTROL MEASURES NOTE: APPROXIMATELY 8 `0N. CONSI'R�; C1 "'_AH N Of' INCHES OF FILTER B A R R 1 A 1,) "E-3 WL" PLACE THE END FABRIC MATERIAL mss C"P� Ef", By Cl AP .... ... .... 4D 4 A? 4, 4 POST OF THE 0 0 MUST EXTEND INTO SECOND FENCE N A TRENCH AND BE ANCHORED WITH INSIDE THE END COMPACTED ( /AN RE"IL", IN b, IPENAL N 'I POST OF THE FIRST FENCE PER N SEE L; SJ k,7 0s. %: S 'H f-'-Al- i I RING W K,' VK" a. BACKFILL MATERIAL R;11 co WOOD OR �4 Q0 ROTATE BOTH STEEL POST CC w 0 CL W w CL POSTS AT LEAST 180 DEGREES IN RUNOFF A CLOCKWISE co U) w DIRECTION TO F- F- > z CREATE A TIGHT IZ) 0 E-4 SEAL WITH THE W m cr w W FABRIC MATERIAL IN //1 xl� 0 1 / 1 DIRECTION OF RUNOFF WATERS 10 INCHES N \x :0 (MIN) AY APPROXIMATE DRIVE BOTH 4—INCH BY POSTS ABOUT 10 INCHES INTO THE 13 4—INCH TRENCH GROUND AND BURY FLAP o TEMPORARY SILT FENCE DETAIL REMOVE ABANDONED SANITARY SEWER , MANHOLE SILT FENCE (TYP) SPACING OF POSTS FILTER FABRI TO BE 6-10 FEET APART WATETIAL "PLUG EXISTING FOR ADDITIONAL STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN BE ATTACHED TO A 6-INCH (MA MESH VARE SCREEN MICH HAS BACKFILLED TRENCH BEEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS r. ma 3 50) M\ In 1 mic mwvBvsv� W�� Mp� a-1Z �Lv �--FULL DRIPLINE PINES LEED CONSULTING ARRIER 0 LL (D M"R M[Romoo Run Type R E C E E C E I V E D V E D Laurel Oak ........ . ....... NOV 0 5 2009 LNECI 0- E 'X T REMO v Eij z ma 3 50) M\ In 1 mic mwvBvsv� W�� Mp� a-1Z �Lv �--FULL DRIPLINE PINES LEED CONSULTING ARRIER 0 LL (D M"R M[Romoo Run Type R E C E E C E I V E D V E D Laurel Oak NOV 0 5 2009 LNECI 0- E 'X T REMO v Eij z EROSION CONTROL MEASURES NOTE: w w CL `0N. CONSI'R�; C1 "'_AH N Of' B A R R 1 A 1,) "E-3 WL" R1­"";';'.';'1 PIJ A'C" i j N ft""i MAY N'U"f")"' N& AS mss C"P� Ef", By Cl AP .... ... .... 4D 4 A? 4, 4 0 0 P'J' j N 1'rl 'A"I"ON OF N J 37"), �29, F k C ( /AN RE"IL", IN b, IPENAL N 'I PER N SEE L; SJ k,7 0s. %: S 'H f-'-Al- i I RING W K,' VK" a. � I R;11 co �4 Q0 CC w 0 CL W w CL co co U) w F- F- > z IZ) 0 E-4 W m cr w W 0 :0 13 Z o E-4 CD O 0 < z PIL, 0 _j I_ 1:1�4 di 2 < z LLI 0 0 w 0 w w 17-1 10- C w CL Fg m U) 9 LD m �E LL (D M"R M[Romoo Run Type R E C E E C E I V E D V E D Laurel Oak NOV 0 5 2009 LNECI G E D VELOPIAENT a H 0 4 0 SE NER111"ORHOOD SERVICES v IT R D RT ECS 0 F 0 0 IC CITY OF CLEARWATER E A A ER E 'X T REMO v Eij z EROSION CONTROL MEASURES NOTE: ;'R R E_'Q U11, R FE'! j EROSION CON"i" OL "E'AS"URES' REMAIN "'I"P01,J _,ri" `0N. CONSI'R�; C1 "'_AH N Of' B A R R 1 A 1,) "E-3 WL" R1­"";';'.';'1 PIJ A'C" i j N ft""i MAY N'U"f")"' N& AS mss C"P� Ef", By Cl AP .... ... .... 4D 4 A? 4, 4 0 0 P'J' j N 1'rl 'A"I"ON OF A CIVIL, PENA'Ll �RES P$' "RS� N T SF­�'__`ON J 37"), �29, F k C ( /AN RE"IL", IN b, IPENAL N 'I PER N SEE L; SJ k,7 0s. %: S 'H f-'-Al- i I RING W K,' VK" a. � I R;11 9 LD m �E LL (D z 0 0 U_ 0 z 0 0 a. F_ co CC w 0 CL W w CL U) w F- F- > W m cr w W :0 13 CD O 0 w cl d z (y_w>—w—ozw ri: LU w ❑FS Z <Z O ow LU z w 0 Df C) J) vs C ": 1w wo z w -i co LU 00) zo gg m w PROJECT #: 100-09 . ORIGINAL DATE: 5/6/09 DRAWN BY: JOB N SCALE: 1"= 20' SHEET NO. 3 OF 8 y ,' SS-SECTION A-(-) HORIZTONTAL SCALE= V-20" VERTICAL SCALE " -` r PLANNING LEED CONSULTING 1350 ADMIRAL WOODSON CLEARWATER, 727-48 www.weaverboyd.com TREE RESERVATION PLAN AREAS.; LEGEND. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING GRADE ® PROPERTY LINE 72.7a PROPOSED GRADE PROPOSED STORM SEWER TYPE C INLET PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE r PLANNING LEED CONSULTING 1350 ADMIRAL WOODSON CLEARWATER, 727-48 www.weaverboyd.com TREE RESERVATION PLAN AREAS.; REFER TO SHEET 5A co AREA 1: TREE BARRICADES, DYDRO--- AERATION AND ON GRADE IRRIGATION SYSTEM Zil COMPLETED PER SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS HEREIN. co AREA 2: TREE PRUNING, W.A.N.E. AERATION UNITS AND REINFORCED CONCRETE co COMPLETED PER SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS HEREIN. 0 co AREA 3: ROOT PRUNING COMPLETED PER SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS HEREIN. AREA 4: DIRECTIANL DRILLING OF SANITARY SEWER LINE TO BE COMPLETED PER SCHEDULE HEREIN. IF DIRECTIONAL DRILLING CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISHED THE 0 co SANITARY LINE WILL BE INSTALLED VIA OPEN TRENCHING AND BOTH SIDES OF THE TRENCH SHALL BE ROOT PRUNED PER THE SPECIFICATONS HEREIN. 0 w w TREE PRESERVATION PLAN NOTES; 1. TREE BARRICADES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AROUND PROTECTED TREES BEING PRESERVED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION OR SITE CLEARING ACTIVITIES. BARRICADES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED USING 2" X 4" LUMBER FOR UPRIGHT POSTS INSTALLED 5' ON CENTER TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 ", WITH A HEIGHT OF AT LEAST 3' EXTENDING ABOVE GRADE. THE UPRIGHT POSTS SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH PLASTIC ORANGE MESH EQUAL TO THE HEIGHT OF THE 2" X 4" UPRIGHTS AND FASTENED SECURELY TO THE co z UPRIGHT POSTS. THE BARRICADES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AND SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER'S LAND RESOURCE SPECIALIST ONCE INSTALLATION IS COMPLETED. IF THE BARRICADES NEED TO BE REMOVED CONTACT THE LAND RESOURCE SPECIALIST AT 727 - 562 -4741 FOR APPROVAL. THE LOCATION OF (24 z THE TREE BARRICADES WILL BE DELINEATED ON THE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN (SHEET 5A). 2. THE AREA WITHIN THE LIVE OAK TREES DRIP LINES THAT IS BEING LEFT UNDISTURBED SHALL BE HYDRO — AERATED TO IMPROVE THE SOIL STRUCTURE AND POROSITY. HYDRO — AERATION INJECTS WATER INTO THE SOIL AT HIGH pq PRESSURE AND IN THE PROCESS REDUCES SOIL COMPACTION. THE SOIL SHALL BE HYDRO— AERATED TO A DEPTH OF 1' WITH INJECTIONS OCCURRING 2' ON CENTER. HYDRO — AERATION SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE w a START OF SITE WORK. < 6i . AN ABOVE GROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM PROVIDING COMPLETE COVERAGE TO a THE UNDISTURBED ROOTING AREA OF THE LIVE OAK TREES SHALL BE III INSTALLED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO OFF —SET THE ROOT LOSS AND Q a cn INCREASE THE FUTURE ROOT DENSITY. NO LANDSCAPE PLANTS OR TRENCHES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THIS AREA. y- 4. ALL PRUNING AND OTHER APPLICABLE ARBORICULTURAL PRACTICES ° ° ° ° ° ° ° cc, C ONDUCTED ON THIS SITE SHALL BE PERFORMED BY OR UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF AN INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE (ISA) w CERTIFIED AR ORIST AND. IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE AMERICAN 0 e c a t: NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI) CRITERIA FOR TREE CARE W z w w w y OPERATIONS A DEFINED IN ANSI A -300. ° � w CL 5, TREE CANOPIES THAT WILL BE IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OR o o a J ° a_ THAT ARE LOCATED OVER PROPOSED VEHICULAR USE AREAS WILL BE RAISED ? ° ® W a Ir OT A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 15' ABOVE GRADE TO FACILITATE CONSTRUCTION ® w w w ul EQUIPMENT AND FUTURE VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. PRUNING SHALL BE COMPLETED ce 0 w a > ul PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE WORK. IN ADDITION, DEAD WOOD m `� a W GREATER THAN 1" IN DIAMETER AND AND BRANCHES POSING AND IMMEDIATE cc cc THREAT TO FAIL SHALL BE REMOVED. 6. ROOT PRUNING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A VERMEER OR DOSCOCIL ROOT a Q Q a ® Lu PRUNING MACHINE TO A DEPTH OF 12 ". ROOT PRUNING SHALL BE COMPLETED n Q Lo BEFORE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ENTERS THE SITE OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES COMMENCE. TREE BARRICADES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE ROOT Q — E= P RUNE LINES IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ROOT PRUNING IS COMPLETE AND THE ROOT PRUNE TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH THE SAME SOIL REMOVED DURING THE ROOT PRUNING OPERATION. IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO CONSULT w WITH THE SITE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE r ,aa�� mi oz ROOT PRUNE LINE. THE EXACT AREA TO BE ROOT PRUNED IS DELINEA w °" ¢ �` $ ° ®,`':f, ®Z THE SHEET 5A AND WILL BE PAINTED BY THE CONSULTING ARBORIST 114&DiE � ` 2B FI ELD. ''# ► cncn 7. THE PARKING AREA WITHIN THE DRIPLlNE'S OF THE TWO LIVE OAK THEt'$� cil _jw BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CONSTRUCTED ON GRADE k �'' ` a� OVER SOILS COMPACTED TO CITY OF CLEARWATER SPECIFICATIONS, S. W.A.N.E. AERATION UNITS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE REINFORCED CO CREW r< ;� *� ocn WITHIN THE OAK TREES DRIP LINES AFTER THE CONCRETE IS CURED. 14BUi ' 4- z 0 LOCATION AND SPACING OF THE UNITS WILL BE BASED ON THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS, PROJECTM 100-09 . THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE BETWEEN THE TWO LIVE OAK T OPJGINAL DATE: 516/09 WILL BE INSTALLED VIA DIRECTIONAL DRILLING WITH IN THE AREA OF e JDB TREE'S DRIP LINES IF POSSIBLE. OTHERWISE THE AREA WILL BE ROOT NED ad" ...... ....... co k--4 . ........... EXISTING SANITARY . ... ...... EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE PROPOSED VALVE A BACKIFLOW PREVENTOR PROPOSED WATER METER PROPERTY LINE _ss —ss — PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER — PROPOSED FIRE LINE & FDC d PROPOSED WATER co PROPOSED STORM SEWER 14111111111110 co 31/ 0 ul z 0 0 u- uj E-q w oz: Z(Di <Z: C wi 3 Luo� Z Lu: uj co Iu w U) f �s f M. i z cc �j ad" UTILITY NOTES ...... ....... co k--4 . ........... EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE PROPOSED VALVE A BACKIFLOW PREVENTOR PROPOSED WATER METER PROPERTY LINE _ss —ss — PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER — PROPOSED FIRE LINE & FDC UTILITY NOTES PLANNING LEED CONSULTING 1350 ADMIRAL WOODSON LN CLEARWATER, FL 33755 7 2 7 -4 8 3 -7513 www.weaverboyd.com LEGEND co k--4 00 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE PROPOSED VALVE PROPOSED BACKIFLOW PREVENTOR PROPOSED WATER METER PROPERTY LINE _ss —ss — PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER — PROPOSED FIRE LINE & FDC PROPOSED WATER co PROPOSED STORM SEWER PLANNING LEED CONSULTING 1350 ADMIRAL WOODSON LN CLEARWATER, FL 33755 7 2 7 -4 8 3 -7513 www.weaverboyd.com <� co k--4 00 Q0 I'll co r'- rm, Go 0 i 0 z co 14111111111110 co 0 ul z 0 0 u- uj E-q w oz: Z(Di <Z: C wi 3 Luo� Z Lu: uj co Iu w U) cj- �D <� k--4 N i co 14111111111110 co C;6 uj w oz: Z(Di <Z: C wi 3 Luo� Z Lu: E--q co Iu U) �D -j Lu z cc �j 00) C) z • F4 ui mroopuy" F-1 zo E--1 < z 0 6i 2 < Z w 0 w -7 0 �4 F-D J_ w 'r c� CL w CL U) 1 FF i 14111111111110 uj w oz: Z(Di <Z: C wi 3 Luo� Z Lu: co Iu U) -j Lu z cc �j 00) z • ui mroopuy" r W W �, ��•� i PLANNING LEED CONSULTING 75.00 7COG 73,00 72.00 CROSS-SECTION A-A HORIZTDNTAL SCALE: 1"=20' VERTICAL SCALE 1/1-5/ LEGEND (MI O EXISTING SANITARY SEWER I EXISTING WATER MAIN G EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING GRADE PROPERTY LINE 72 i0 PROPOSED GRADE M PROPOSED STORM SEWER per the schedule and specifications on sheet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan. TYPE C INLET @) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE 2 —Tree pruning, WAKE aeration units and reinforced concrete completed per the schedule and specifications on,3heet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan. co z 0 #3 — Root pruning to be completed per the schedule and specifications on sheet 0 #5 of 8 — Grading Plan. 4— Directional drilling of the sanitary sewer line to be completed per the schedule and specifications on sheet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan. A 75.00 7COG 73,00 72.00 CROSS-SECTION A-A HORIZTDNTAL SCALE: 1"=20' VERTICAL SCALE 1/1-5/ *Refer to Sheet # 5 of 8 — Grading Plan for schedule and specifications • • for the tree preservation measure, LEGEND (MI O EXISTING SANITARY SEWER I EXISTING WATER MAIN G EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING GRADE PROPERTY LINE 72 i0 PROPOSED GRADE M PROPOSED STORM SEWER per the schedule and specifications on sheet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan. TYPE C INLET @) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE *Refer to Sheet # 5 of 8 — Grading Plan for schedule and specifications • • for the tree preservation measure, I (MI O I IN W 1- Tree barricades, hydro-aeration and on grade irrigation system completed M C.0 per the schedule and specifications on sheet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan. 2 —Tree pruning, WAKE aeration units and reinforced concrete completed per the schedule and specifications on,3heet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan. co z 0 #3 — Root pruning to be completed per the schedule and specifications on sheet 0 #5 of 8 — Grading Plan. 4— Directional drilling of the sanitary sewer line to be completed per the schedule and specifications on sheet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan. CZ) > > E-4 0C W z 0 W LLoz 0- PD OCT 2 12009 CITY so 0. I (MI O I W z M C.0 co z 0) �4 0 CZ) > > 0C LLJ LLoz V) Uj cl� W > 0 0 z 0 W CL W 09 Uj Z < (D Z Uj C) W W C) CC z 0 9 Z W 2 M G) _j M v) LU F_ C\1 M 0 F-T-4 6i Z. < V) () �.4 W 0" �D z W 7� cc (L M 0. SHEET NO. OF 8 I (MI O I W M co 0) LLoz cl� W > 0 0 z 0 W W 09 Z < (D Z C) W W C) > < Z W 2 M G) _j M v) LU F_ C\1 M C/) U) W V) _j W z Er D < 7� M < 0 > W 0 Cn z0 M < < :E W LL < < T— __j I a Q_ CL PROJECT #: 100-09 M >- C' M< C<D a- ORIGINAL DATE: 5/6/09 C) Cq Q0 DRAWN BY: JDB ILO CL u- _j _j SCALE: 1 1"= 20' 1 C'4 co (9 No SHEET NO. OF 8