2265-2271 GULF TO BAY BLVDbcp2009-10244
CITY OF CLEARWATER - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Z? y Aij v.
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT
NAME OF OWNER
SITE ADDRESS 2 - 22 -7
PHONE 72 %7- ' 0 6Q
OWNER'S ADDRESS
LOCATION OF TREE(S) ON LOT f.G`
SPECIES AND NUMBER OF TREE(S)
TO APPLICANT:
A non - refundable of $
be removed, plus $3.00 foi
removed is required.
=L' Q*Ar R
FOR REMOVAL:
kconstruction
•See "A" below
• Hazardous
• Declining
❑ Dead
❑ Other (Specify)
A) CONSTRUCTION
Li
L3
- _
1. For new construction, additions or other mod
Icati
rQn,��_
a site plan is required. This site plan
must have a
site plan must include:
a. Major Changes of Grade
f. Proposed Number of Parking Spaces
b. Structure Locations
g. Proposed Underground Utilities
c, Driveways and Walks
h. Zoning Setbacks
d. Parking Arrangement
i. All easements and Rights -of -Way
e. Required Number of Parking Spaces
Fee Recd. $
Date
the removal of a protected tree(s),
mile lots, or 1 " -50' for all others. The
j. All Protected Trees Including:
(i.) Diameter of 4.5' above grade (DBH)
(ii.) Surveyed Location
(iii.) Species
(iv.) Diseased or Insect Infested Trees
k. Tree Barricade Detail & Locations
i.
b
O
2. Protective barriers are required around all trees remaining on site during construction. These barricades must remain
intact during construction. The barriers must meet City Specifications.
B) REPLACEMENTS D
1. Tree replacement minimum standards: 10' overall height, 2.5" caliper, Florida Grade #1. See inspectors note below to -'
determine the number of replacement trees required. Replacements required within 30 days.
v
I hereby certify that as property owner or as representative of the property owner, I have verified that the tree(s) sought D
to be removed is wholly on property owned by the above - identified property owner, and should it be determined that 0
the tree re located wholly or partially on property owned by some other person, then, I agree to hold the City of
Clearw ter armless in any claim made for wrongful removal of such tree(s). I hereby certify that this application together
vJlti i ,y pl- �S Subs i iiiied iS a +'Y'e repreSei �fatiai of aii faCIJ concerning Ali �g tl IG� proposed lei I IVVal al ti Ie Iles. (J). AI ly deVlUllal I
fr he rmit iss sh der it II and void and be considered a violation of the Community Development Code.
'
S' nature of owner or a plicant Printed Name
Address Agency Represen ' g OCL #
J,d �s�°,�itiftS G 3�d 7 y3 2 - 0 27
City State Zip Phone /Cell Fax
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - Not Valid Until Signed By City Manager or his Designated Agent
Inspecto's Cory) ments:
RG{uire¢[2eplacement Trees:
U f/,
Applicable Code Section:,
Based on the Inspector's comments and information submitted, the above removal application is:
❑ Approved as Submitted AApproved- Modified as Noted Above ❑ Denied
Signed: Date: 10
Community evelopmen Coordinator or Designee /Inspector Valid for six months from the date of issuance.
1362.0001 -GC White - Planning & Development Services Yellow - Applicant Rev. 2-03
Tree Inventory -- gE s 0"1_y c0 iUC -e2
Gulf - to - Bay Plaza S u$s�, -r Pte, 0,EAry , a�
Clearwater, Florida -4 i aH - '+ 3s—
Prepared by Alan Mayberry November 15, 2005
For: RMC Development LLC
The following report is submitted by Alan Mayberry, Consulting Arborist, and includes
findings that I believe are accurate based on my education, experience and knowledge in
the field of Arboriculture. I have no interest personally or financially in this property and
my report is factual and unbiased. This report is the property of RMC Development LLC
and will not be given to other entities unless so directed.
Site Overview and Tree Canopy Analysis
The subject site is commercial property located in Clearwater. The site consists of trees
planted to meet landscape requirements that are growing in landscape islands within
parking lots or in landscape buffers adjacent to parking lots_ The tree canopy is
comprised primarily of two native shade tree species: the live oak (Quercus virginiana)
and the winged elm (Ulmus alata). In addition, the site supports a quantity of the exotic
crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) tree, and a few additional tree and palm species. The
trees and palms in general are suffering from poor overall maintenance, insufficient
irrigation and compacted soil conditions. The winged elms in particular have been
adversely affected from improper pruning practices such as topping and rounding over,
which have caused serious structural problems in these trees. Consequently, the majority
of the elms have been downgraded and recommended for removal. A large percentage of
the live oak trees also have structural issues and are recommended for removal. The
opportunity for tree preservation at this site is limited to a relatively small percentage of
trees that are structurally sound and systemically healthy. The inventory identifies several
trees that have minor structural problems but are otherwise healthy and could be
preserved per the remedial measures defined in the comments section for the individual
trees. Trees in this category should not be preserved if the remedial work will not be
performed. As trees and people will closely interface on this site it is paramount that the
site trees have good structure. A second problem facing the site trees is their locations
relative to space issues such as growing in or around small landscape areas, adjacent
structures, overhead utility wires, billboards etc. Tree preservation options are limited at
this site and the best strategy may be to plant new trees with good structure and species
characteristics and ensure that they have sufficient space and are maintained properly.
Following this overview is an explanation of the terms and codes used in the tree
inventory and then the actual inventory which will rate the individual trees. Please pay
attention to the site notes within the inventory as they contain specific information to
assist the development team with the site design in regards to tree preservation.
NOTE: This inventory will include an addendum that will breakdown the number of
trees (converted to diameter inches) that have a condition rating of 3.0 or above
(considered worthy of preservation and requiring mitigation) and the number of trees that
have a condition rating of 2.5 or less and do not require mitigation. This information can
be used in designing a landscape plan that meets the City's tree replacement
requirements.
Tree Inventory Data
A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a
valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could
lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four
codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the data used in
the inventory:
Tree# - location - Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that
corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the
field.
Size — Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If
there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area
below the fork. Palm species are measured in feet of clear trunk (C.T.).
Species — Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in
the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter.
Condition Rating — The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural
strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities,
decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and
attachments, i.e., well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the
trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included
bark.
Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net
photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health
will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree
as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating
include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2)
crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the
tree is making and storing energy.
The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any
unique features. The rating scale is 0 -6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen.
Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as
follows:
V
0- A dead tree
1- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease
or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category 41
ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). A tree with a rating
of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury
or property damage.
2 — A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with included
bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback,
cracked/split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low
energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies
or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s)
can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable
amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating.
3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be
corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal
area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon
have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average
appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible.
4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems
that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive
appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree
should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees
exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can
be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic
amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the property and
should be preserved.
5 — A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health
and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this
category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in
this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity
and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value
to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is
worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation.
6 — A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior
qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown
ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness.
A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures
that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an
undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an
3
experienced and competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified
Arborist should be allowed work on a specimen tree.
Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not
covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may
include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It
may also have recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree.
NOTE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3 -5 years. However, events such as
drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance and
severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial
maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely
affected, have the tree inspected by a qualified International Society of
Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist.
Note: Whenever possible it is advised to adhere to inventory recommendations when
selecting trees to be preserved. For example, trees rated 4.0 and higher should be
preserved if at all possible, while trees rated 2.0 and lower should be removed unless
otherwise noted in the inventory. Trees rated 2.5 are generally recommended for removal
unless remedial work is performed to upgrade them. Trees rated 3.0 and 3.5 are average
trees that have good potential and warrant serious consideration for preservation but not
to the extent that site plan modifications are necessary.
This tree inventory was conducted on November 15 & 16, 2005. The weather was
clear with good visibility. The leaves were beginning to fall on some of the winged
elm trees consequently their systemic health was judged by inspection of the stems.
The remainder of the species had not started leaf senescence.
Per City of Clearwater requirements the tree inventory will provide specific
information in the comments section as justification for each tree with an overall
condition rating of 2.5 or below. In addition, trees rated 3.0 and higher may also
have specific comments to assist the development team in their decision making
process.
Tree Inventory
Tree # Size Species Rating
1 13" live oak (Quercus virginiana) 3.0
2 16" live oak 3.0
3 16" live oak 2.0
117 7" winged elm 2.0
Comments: This tree forms a codominant trunk 18" above grade and indicates internal
fracture. The upper crown structure is below average. Recommend removal.
118 9" winged elm 2.5
Comments: This tree develops four scaffold branches emanating from the same area 011
the trunk. Two of the codominant branches are included and there is a wire embedded in
one of the crotches. The tree has been topped previously and the overall structure is very
poor. Recommend removal.
119 7" winged elm 2.0
Comments: This tree forms a severally included codominant trunk 3' above grade. 5.5'
above grade the tree develops three more codominant stems. This tree has suffered from
poor pruning in the form of flush cuts and stub cuts. The form and live crown ratio are
below average. Recommend removal.
120 9" winged elm 2.5
Comments: This tree develops a severally included codominant trunk 4.5' above grade.
The crotch is displaying the swellings on each end that indicate internal fracture. The tree
is leaning and is slightly mounded at the root collar. The eastern trunk forks into two
codominant branches that have included bark. The crown has good form and high live
crown ratio but the tree is recommended for removal due to poor structure.
121 7" winged elm 3.0
NOTE: Trees # 122 -134 are part of an annexed property and as such reflect different
maintenance patterns. The pruning performed on these trees exhibit a higher standard of
professional treecare.
122 12' C.T. queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana) 3.0
Comments: This palm is systemically healthy but may not warrant preservation due to
scarring on the trunk.
123' 20' C.T. queen palm 2.0
Comments: This palm develops a trunk restriction 14' above grade. In addition, the bark
has sloughed off from most of the trunk in the first 7' of the trunk and has diminished any
aesthetic value. Recommend removal.
124 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.5
125 26" live oak 4.0
Comments: This tree has very good structure in the trunk and throughout the crown and
has very good systemic health as indicated by vigorous shoot growth at the branch tips.
The live crown ratio is only average due to extensive pruning to accommodate this tree to
vehicular traffic and the former mobile homes. The pruning reflects proper cuts and
professional maintenance. This tree is very worthy of preservation. Allow as much
undisturbed rooting area as possible, preferably equal to the tree's dripline (outermost
branch spread).
126 36" live oak 4.5
Comments: This tree has exceptional structure and systemic health. The trunk forms two
large scaffold branches 7' above grade but the crotch is u- shaped with connective tissue
present. A large branch was removed 8' above grade but it was a correct collar cut and
the tree will compartmentalize the wound. The live crown ratio is high and the tree is
showing vigorous growth at the tips, mostly likely due to the extensive rooting area
available. The form is good and this tree lends high aesthetic value to the property. This
tree should be preserved if at all possible. If preserved, allow as much undisturbed
rooting area as possible, preferably equal to the tree's dripline.
127 35' C.T. Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta) 4.5
Comments: Recommend preservation in place or relocation on site.
128 23" live oak 3.0
Comments: This tree is located on or within a foot of the east property line. The tree has a
large wire running through the center of the crown and it appears to be lying on a lateral
branch. The branch that it is laying on grows to the southeast and onto the roof and wall
of an adjacent building. This entire large branch could be removed and it would solve the
wire problem and the interference with the building. A second solution would be to
relocate the wire or place a wrap on the wire to protect both the wire and the branch. This
tree is border line as to whether it should be preserved. The crown is irregular due to the
pruning to accommodate the wire. The structure is below average but the live crown ratio
is very good. however, as it is growing on the property line it likely will end up in a
landscape buffer. This tree could be incorporated into the site design; however it will
need maintenance to solve the wire issue.
NOTE: The tree survey shows a palm south of tree #128, but it has less than 10' of clear
trunk and is not protected by city code.
129 32" live oak 3.0
Comment: This tree forks into three trunks 4' above grade. Both crotches are included
and displaying early signs of internal fracture as there is slight swelling on the outside of
the crotch. This is the type of codominant attachment that can lead to failure in live oak
trees. The live crown ratio and the upper crown structure are good. The form is beautiful
as the tree has a wide- spreading picturesque crown. This tree is young and healthy and
could evolve into a signature landscape centerpiece if maintained properly. If preserved
this tree should be cabled and braced to ensure structural stability. It is warranted given
the aesthetic amenities that this tree will impart to the site.
130 24" Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) 0.0
Comments: This tree is a noxious exotic species that is on the category one list of the
State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council list. It is against the law in the City of
Clearwater to plant this tree and state law requires its removal in new developments.
Removal is mandatory.
Note: The site plan shows a palm tree existing to the west of tree #130 but it has less than
10' of clear trunk and is not protected by city code.
131 11" laurel oak 3.0
Comments: This tree is an exceptional tree except for a codominant leader 10' above
grade. This codominant could easily be corrected through subordinate pruning.
Recommend preservation.
132 5" golden rain (Koelreuteria paniculata) 2.0
Comments: This tree has a sparse crown and the scaffold branch on the north side is
dead. Recommend removal.
133 38" laurel oak 3.0
Comments: This tree appears to be a hybrid laurel /water oak. It is a mature tree with an
attractive form as it displays a large rounded symmetrical canopy. The live crown ratio
and overall structure are slightly above average. The tree has several large scaffold
branches emanating from the same general area of the trunk but they do not appear to be
in jeopardy of failing. The tree has an open cavity on the west side of the trunk 6' above
grade that is 1' high by 10" wide. It is not causing serious structural problems. On the
north side at the base there is a cavity that extends into the tree about 2'. This type of
cavity is a concern. The decay is not serious now, but it is progressive and will undermine
the tree's stability in the future. The tree also has some trunk cankers but they are not
serious. The systemic health is average. The tip growth is minimal and the canopy
slightly thinning which in indicative of the onset of old age. This tree is ready to begin
the mortality spiral common to water or laurel oak trees of this age. They typically reach
an age of about 65 years in urban areas. In its current condition it is worthy of
preservation. However, this tree as noted is entering an irreversible health decline stage
of its life which will be accelerated by any impact from the proposed development. And
as its root system covers such a vast area, impacts are inevitable. Consequently, this tree
is not recommended for preservation. The site would be better served to preserve the
higher rated live oak trees which can live up to 300 years and are more able to withstand
construction impacts.
134 31" live oak 2.5
Comments: This tree iS downgraded due to very poor structure. The trunk has a
codominant beginning at 1' above grade that is included for 3'. The crotch is displaying
the swelling around the crotch that indicates internal fracture. This type of basal
codominant is prone to fail when the tree becomes large however; it could be stabilized
with cabling and bracing procedures. The upper crown structure, form and live crown
ratio is very good. If secured by cabling and bracing this tree could evolve into a
beautiful tree, otherwise removal is recommended due to poor structure.
135 19" live oak 3.0
Comments: This tree has a utility pole 7' west of the trunk and a rack of wires are
running north and south and east through the crown of this tree. The crown has been
pruned considerably due to the presence of the wires and will have to be pruned in the
future if the wires stay. The structure and systemic health are good. The form has
suffered due to the pruning and the crown is somewhat irregular. If the wires will be
relocated as part of the new development then this tree could be preserved and it will-
evolve into a good tree with proper pruning. If the wires will stay removal is
recommended.
* 5 1l 3/23/2010
q Receipt #: 1201000000000002094
3:39:54PM
_ �� Date: 03 /23/2010
Line Items:
Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid
BCP2009 -10244 Tree Fund 018199970351101000 2,160.00
Line Item Total: $2,160.00
Payments:
Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid
Check ELLIS AND CO LTD R_D 2294 In Person 2,160.00
Payment Total: $2,160.00
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT.
This is a receipt for an application for a permit.
This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application.
CRCCCiP1.1nt
Page 1 of I
REMOVE
ABANDONED
SANITARY SEWER ,
MANHOLE
SILT FENCE (TYP)
SPACING OF POSTS FILTER FABRI
TO BE 6-10 FEET APART WATETIAL
"PLUG EXISTING
FOR ADDITIONAL STRENGTH
FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN
BE ATTACHED TO A 6-INCH (MA
MESH VARE SCREEN MICH HAS
BACKFILLED TRENCH BEEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS
r.
FILTER FABRIC
M"R
M[Romoo Run
777
MATERIAL SECURELY
FASTENED TO THE
ATTACHING TWO SILT
v
........ . .......
POSTS OR IF USED
NOV 0 5 2009
LNECI
THE WIRE MESH
CONTRACTOR TO
E
'X T
REMO v Eij
z
EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES NOTE:
APPROXIMATELY 8
DETERMIN E L❑CATf❑N
"'_AH N Of'
INCHES OF FILTER
B A R R 1 A 1,) "E-3 WL"
PLACE THE END
FABRIC MATERIAL
mss C"P� Ef", By Cl AP .... ... ....
4D 4 A? 4, 4
POST OF THE
AIG-1 NV ERT"OF"'
MUST EXTEND INTO
SECOND FENCE
N
A TRENCH AND BE
ANCHORED WITH
INSIDE THE END
EXISTING SANIT Y
( /AN RE"IL", IN b, IPENAL N 'I
POST OF THE
FIRST FENCE
PER N SEE
L; SJ k,7 0s. %: S
'H f-'-Al- i I RING W K,' VK"
a.
BACKFILL MATERIAL
R;11
UB RIOR 0 kNY
Tb'
N.
WOOD OR
....,CONSTRUCTI, ...........
�4
Q0
--.,.,INGRESS &
EGRESS
STEEL POST
..... ....
W
w
CL
::
EASEM T BOOK
RUNOFF
A CLOCKWISE
co
... .....
PAGE
2533
DIRECTION TO
F-
F- >
z
CREATE A TIGHT
IZ)
0
E-4
SEAL WITH THE
W
m cr
w
W
CONTRACTOR TO .. .. ....... . ...... ..
FABRIC MATERIAL
IN
//1
xl�
0
1 / 1
DIRECTION OF RUNOFF WATERS
REFER TO IRE
'N
10 INCHES
N
\x
:0
(MIN)
PRESERVWTION A
AY
APPROXIMATE
DRIVE BOTH
`-SHEEJ/tA FOR
POSTS ABOUT 10
INCHES INTO THE
13
4—INCH TRENCH
GROUND AND
FtrER DETAILS
BURY FLAP
o
TEMPORARY SILT
FENCE DETAIL
TREE/ BAE RICADE (TYP)—\
CD
O 0
REMOVE
ABANDONED
SANITARY SEWER ,
MANHOLE
SILT FENCE (TYP)
SPACING OF POSTS FILTER FABRI
TO BE 6-10 FEET APART WATETIAL
"PLUG EXISTING
FOR ADDITIONAL STRENGTH
FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN
BE ATTACHED TO A 6-INCH (MA
MESH VARE SCREEN MICH HAS
BACKFILLED TRENCH BEEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS
r.
FILTER FABRIC
M"R
M[Romoo Run
Type
MATERIAL SECURELY
FASTENED TO THE
ATTACHING TWO SILT
FENCES
........ . .......
POSTS OR IF USED
NOV 0 5 2009
LNECI
THE WIRE MESH
0-
E
'X T
REMO v Eij
z
EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES NOTE:
APPROXIMATELY 8
`0N.
CONSI'R�; C1
"'_AH N Of'
INCHES OF FILTER
B A R R 1 A 1,) "E-3 WL"
PLACE THE END
FABRIC MATERIAL
mss C"P� Ef", By Cl AP .... ... ....
4D 4 A? 4, 4
POST OF THE
0 0
MUST EXTEND INTO
SECOND FENCE
N
A TRENCH AND BE
ANCHORED WITH
INSIDE THE END
COMPACTED
( /AN RE"IL", IN b, IPENAL N 'I
POST OF THE
FIRST FENCE
PER N SEE
L; SJ k,7 0s. %: S
'H f-'-Al- i I RING W K,' VK"
a.
BACKFILL MATERIAL
R;11
co
WOOD OR
�4
Q0
ROTATE BOTH
STEEL POST
CC
w
0 CL
W
w
CL
POSTS AT LEAST
180 DEGREES IN
RUNOFF
A CLOCKWISE
co
U)
w
DIRECTION TO
F-
F- >
z
CREATE A TIGHT
IZ)
0
E-4
SEAL WITH THE
W
m cr
w
W
FABRIC MATERIAL
IN
//1
xl�
0
1 / 1
DIRECTION OF RUNOFF WATERS
10 INCHES
N
\x
:0
(MIN)
AY
APPROXIMATE
DRIVE BOTH
4—INCH BY
POSTS ABOUT 10
INCHES INTO THE
13
4—INCH TRENCH
GROUND AND
BURY FLAP
o
TEMPORARY SILT
FENCE DETAIL
REMOVE
ABANDONED
SANITARY SEWER ,
MANHOLE
SILT FENCE (TYP)
SPACING OF POSTS FILTER FABRI
TO BE 6-10 FEET APART WATETIAL
"PLUG EXISTING
FOR ADDITIONAL STRENGTH
FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN
BE ATTACHED TO A 6-INCH (MA
MESH VARE SCREEN MICH HAS
BACKFILLED TRENCH BEEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS
r.
ma
3
50) M\ In 1
mic
mwvBvsv� W�� Mp�
a-1Z �Lv
�--FULL DRIPLINE
PINES
LEED CONSULTING
ARRIER 0
LL
(D
M"R
M[Romoo Run
Type
R E C E
E C E I V E D
V E D
Laurel Oak
........ . .......
NOV 0 5 2009
LNECI
0-
E
'X T
REMO v Eij
z
ma
3
50) M\ In 1
mic
mwvBvsv� W�� Mp�
a-1Z �Lv
�--FULL DRIPLINE
PINES
LEED CONSULTING
ARRIER 0
LL
(D
M"R
M[Romoo Run
Type
R E C E
E C E I V E D
V E D
Laurel Oak
NOV 0 5 2009
LNECI
0-
E
'X T
REMO v Eij
z
EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES NOTE:
w
w
CL
`0N.
CONSI'R�; C1
"'_AH N Of'
B A R R 1 A 1,) "E-3 WL"
R1"";';'.';'1 PIJ A'C" i j N ft""i MAY N'U"f")"'
N& AS
mss C"P� Ef", By Cl AP .... ... ....
4D 4 A? 4, 4
0 0
P'J' j
N 1'rl
'A"I"ON OF
N
J
37"), �29, F k C
( /AN RE"IL", IN b, IPENAL N 'I
PER N SEE
L; SJ k,7 0s. %: S
'H f-'-Al- i I RING W K,' VK"
a.
� I
R;11
co
�4
Q0
CC
w
0 CL
W
w
CL
co
co
U)
w
F-
F- >
z
IZ)
0
E-4
W
m cr
w
W
0
:0
13
Z
o
E-4
CD
O 0
<
z
PIL,
0
_j
I_
1:1�4
di
2
<
z
LLI
0
0
w
0
w
w
17-1
10-
C
w
CL
Fg
m
U)
9
LD m
�E
LL
(D
M"R
M[Romoo Run
Type
R E C E
E C E I V E D
V E D
Laurel Oak
NOV 0 5 2009
LNECI
G E
D VELOPIAENT a
H 0 4 0 SE
NER111"ORHOOD SERVICES
v
IT R D RT ECS
0 F 0 0 IC
CITY OF CLEARWATER
E A A ER
E
'X T
REMO v Eij
z
EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES NOTE:
;'R
R E_'Q U11, R FE'! j EROSION CON"i" OL "E'AS"URES' REMAIN "'I"P01,J _,ri"
`0N.
CONSI'R�; C1
"'_AH N Of'
B A R R 1 A 1,) "E-3 WL"
R1"";';'.';'1 PIJ A'C" i j N ft""i MAY N'U"f")"'
N& AS
mss C"P� Ef", By Cl AP .... ... ....
4D 4 A? 4, 4
0 0
P'J' j
N 1'rl
'A"I"ON OF
A
CIVIL, PENA'Ll �RES P$' "RS� N T SF�'__`ON
J
37"), �29, F k C
( /AN RE"IL", IN b, IPENAL N 'I
PER N SEE
L; SJ k,7 0s. %: S
'H f-'-Al- i I RING W K,' VK"
a.
� I
R;11
9
LD m
�E
LL
(D
z
0
0
U_ 0
z
0 0
a.
F_
co
CC
w
0 CL
W
w
CL
U)
w
F-
F- >
W
m cr
w
W
:0
13
CD
O 0
w
cl
d
z
(y_w>—w—ozw
ri:
LU
w
❑FS
Z
<Z O
ow
LU
z w
0 Df
C)
J) vs
C ":
1w wo
z w
-i co
LU
00)
zo
gg
m
w
PROJECT #:
100-09
.
ORIGINAL DATE:
5/6/09
DRAWN
BY:
JOB
N
SCALE:
1"= 20'
SHEET NO.
3
OF 8
y ,'
SS-SECTION A-(-)
HORIZTONTAL SCALE= V-20"
VERTICAL SCALE " -`
r
PLANNING
LEED CONSULTING
1350 ADMIRAL WOODSON
CLEARWATER,
727-48
www.weaverboyd.com
TREE RESERVATION PLAN AREAS.;
LEGEND.
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING WATER MAIN
EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE
EXISTING GRADE
®
PROPERTY LINE
72.7a
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
TYPE C INLET
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE
r
PLANNING
LEED CONSULTING
1350 ADMIRAL WOODSON
CLEARWATER,
727-48
www.weaverboyd.com
TREE RESERVATION PLAN AREAS.;
REFER TO SHEET 5A
co
AREA 1: TREE BARRICADES, DYDRO--- AERATION AND ON GRADE IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Zil
COMPLETED PER SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS HEREIN.
co
AREA 2: TREE PRUNING, W.A.N.E. AERATION UNITS AND REINFORCED CONCRETE
co
COMPLETED PER SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS HEREIN.
0
co
AREA 3: ROOT PRUNING COMPLETED PER SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS HEREIN.
AREA 4: DIRECTIANL DRILLING OF SANITARY SEWER LINE TO BE COMPLETED PER
SCHEDULE HEREIN. IF DIRECTIONAL DRILLING CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISHED THE
0
co
SANITARY LINE WILL BE INSTALLED VIA OPEN TRENCHING AND BOTH SIDES OF
THE TRENCH SHALL BE ROOT PRUNED PER THE SPECIFICATONS HEREIN.
0
w
w
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN NOTES;
1. TREE BARRICADES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AROUND PROTECTED TREES BEING
PRESERVED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION OR SITE
CLEARING ACTIVITIES. BARRICADES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED USING 2" X 4"
LUMBER FOR UPRIGHT POSTS INSTALLED 5' ON CENTER TO A MINIMUM DEPTH
OF 12 ", WITH A HEIGHT OF AT LEAST 3' EXTENDING ABOVE GRADE. THE
UPRIGHT POSTS SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH PLASTIC ORANGE MESH EQUAL
TO THE HEIGHT OF THE 2" X 4" UPRIGHTS AND FASTENED SECURELY TO THE
co
z
UPRIGHT POSTS. THE BARRICADES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGHOUT THE
CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AND SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE BY THE
CITY OF CLEARWATER'S LAND RESOURCE SPECIALIST ONCE INSTALLATION IS
COMPLETED. IF THE BARRICADES NEED TO BE REMOVED CONTACT THE LAND
RESOURCE SPECIALIST AT 727 - 562 -4741 FOR APPROVAL. THE LOCATION OF
(24
z
THE TREE BARRICADES WILL BE DELINEATED ON THE TREE PRESERVATION
PLAN (SHEET 5A).
2. THE AREA WITHIN THE LIVE OAK TREES DRIP LINES THAT IS BEING LEFT
UNDISTURBED SHALL BE HYDRO — AERATED TO IMPROVE THE SOIL STRUCTURE
AND POROSITY. HYDRO — AERATION INJECTS WATER INTO THE SOIL AT HIGH
pq
PRESSURE AND IN THE PROCESS REDUCES SOIL COMPACTION. THE SOIL
SHALL BE HYDRO— AERATED TO A DEPTH OF 1' WITH INJECTIONS OCCURRING
2' ON CENTER. HYDRO — AERATION SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE
w
a
START OF SITE WORK.
<
6i
. AN ABOVE GROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM PROVIDING COMPLETE COVERAGE TO
a
THE UNDISTURBED ROOTING AREA OF THE LIVE OAK TREES SHALL BE
III
INSTALLED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO OFF —SET THE ROOT LOSS AND
Q
a
cn
INCREASE THE FUTURE ROOT DENSITY. NO LANDSCAPE PLANTS OR TRENCHES
SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THIS AREA.
y-
4. ALL PRUNING AND OTHER APPLICABLE ARBORICULTURAL PRACTICES
°
° °
°
°
° °
cc,
C ONDUCTED ON THIS SITE SHALL BE PERFORMED BY OR UNDER THE
SUPERVISION OF AN INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE (ISA)
w
CERTIFIED AR ORIST AND. IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE AMERICAN
0
e
c a
t:
NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI) CRITERIA FOR TREE CARE
W
z w
w
w
y
OPERATIONS A DEFINED IN ANSI A -300.
°
�
w
CL
5, TREE CANOPIES THAT WILL BE IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OR
o
o
a
J °
a_
THAT ARE LOCATED OVER PROPOSED VEHICULAR USE AREAS WILL BE RAISED
? °
®
W
a
Ir
OT A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 15' ABOVE GRADE TO FACILITATE CONSTRUCTION
®
w
w w
ul
EQUIPMENT AND FUTURE VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. PRUNING SHALL BE COMPLETED
ce
0
w
a
>
ul
PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF SITE WORK. IN ADDITION, DEAD WOOD
m `�
a
W
GREATER THAN 1" IN DIAMETER AND AND BRANCHES POSING AND IMMEDIATE
cc
cc
THREAT TO FAIL SHALL BE REMOVED.
6. ROOT PRUNING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A VERMEER OR DOSCOCIL ROOT
a Q
Q
a ®
Lu
PRUNING MACHINE TO A DEPTH OF 12 ". ROOT PRUNING SHALL BE COMPLETED
n Q
Lo
BEFORE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ENTERS THE SITE OR CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES COMMENCE. TREE BARRICADES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE ROOT
Q —
E=
P RUNE LINES IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ROOT PRUNING IS COMPLETE AND THE
ROOT PRUNE TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH THE SAME SOIL REMOVED
DURING THE ROOT PRUNING OPERATION. IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO CONSULT
w
WITH THE SITE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE
r ,aa�� mi
oz
ROOT PRUNE LINE. THE EXACT AREA TO BE ROOT PRUNED IS DELINEA
w °" ¢ �`
$ ° ®,`':f,
®Z
THE SHEET 5A AND WILL BE PAINTED BY THE CONSULTING ARBORIST 114&DiE
� `
2B
FI ELD.
''#
►
cncn
7. THE PARKING AREA WITHIN THE DRIPLlNE'S OF THE TWO LIVE OAK THEt'$�
cil
_jw
BE CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CONSTRUCTED ON GRADE
k �''
`
a�
OVER SOILS COMPACTED TO CITY OF CLEARWATER SPECIFICATIONS,
S. W.A.N.E. AERATION UNITS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE REINFORCED CO CREW
r<
;� *�
ocn
WITHIN THE OAK TREES DRIP LINES AFTER THE CONCRETE IS CURED. 14BUi
' 4-
z 0
LOCATION AND SPACING OF THE UNITS WILL BE BASED ON THE
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS,
PROJECTM
100-09
. THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE BETWEEN THE TWO LIVE OAK T
OPJGINAL DATE:
516/09
WILL BE INSTALLED VIA DIRECTIONAL DRILLING WITH IN THE AREA OF
e
JDB
TREE'S DRIP LINES IF POSSIBLE. OTHERWISE THE AREA WILL BE ROOT NED
ad"
...... .......
co
k--4
. ...........
EXISTING SANITARY
. ... ......
EXISTING WATER MAIN
EXISTING SANITARY
MANHOLE
PROPOSED
VALVE
A
BACKIFLOW PREVENTOR
PROPOSED
WATER METER
PROPERTY
LINE
_ss —ss —
PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER
—
PROPOSED
FIRE LINE & FDC
d
PROPOSED
WATER
co
PROPOSED
STORM SEWER
14111111111110
co
31/
0
ul
z
0
0
u-
uj
E-q
w
oz:
Z(Di
<Z:
C wi
3
Luo�
Z Lu:
uj
co Iu
w
U)
f
�s f
M.
i
z cc
�j
ad"
UTILITY NOTES
...... .......
co
k--4
. ...........
EXISTING SANITARY
SEWER
EXISTING WATER MAIN
EXISTING SANITARY
MANHOLE
PROPOSED
VALVE
A
BACKIFLOW PREVENTOR
PROPOSED
WATER METER
PROPERTY
LINE
_ss —ss —
PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER
—
PROPOSED
FIRE LINE & FDC
UTILITY NOTES
PLANNING
LEED CONSULTING
1350 ADMIRAL WOODSON LN
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
7 2 7 -4 8 3 -7513
www.weaverboyd.com
LEGEND
co
k--4
00
EXISTING SANITARY
SEWER
EXISTING WATER MAIN
EXISTING SANITARY
MANHOLE
PROPOSED
VALVE
PROPOSED
BACKIFLOW PREVENTOR
PROPOSED
WATER METER
PROPERTY
LINE
_ss —ss —
PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER
—
PROPOSED
FIRE LINE & FDC
PROPOSED
WATER
co
PROPOSED
STORM SEWER
PLANNING
LEED CONSULTING
1350 ADMIRAL WOODSON LN
CLEARWATER, FL 33755
7 2 7 -4 8 3 -7513
www.weaverboyd.com
<�
co
k--4
00
Q0
I'll
co
r'-
rm,
Go
0
i
0
z
co
14111111111110
co
0
ul
z
0
0
u-
uj
E-q
w
oz:
Z(Di
<Z:
C wi
3
Luo�
Z Lu:
uj
co Iu
w
U)
cj-
�D
<�
k--4
N
i
co
14111111111110
co
C;6
uj
w
oz:
Z(Di
<Z:
C wi
3
Luo�
Z Lu:
E--q
co Iu
U)
�D
-j Lu
z cc
�j
00)
C)
z •
F4
ui
mroopuy"
F-1
zo
E--1
<
z
0
6i
2
<
Z
w
0
w
-7
0
�4
F-D
J_
w
'r
c�
CL
w
CL
U)
1
FF
i
14111111111110
uj
w
oz:
Z(Di
<Z:
C wi
3
Luo�
Z Lu:
co Iu
U)
-j Lu
z cc
�j
00)
z •
ui
mroopuy"
r W W
�, ��•�
i
PLANNING
LEED CONSULTING
75.00
7COG
73,00
72.00
CROSS-SECTION A-A
HORIZTDNTAL SCALE: 1"=20'
VERTICAL SCALE 1/1-5/
LEGEND
(MI
O
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
I
EXISTING WATER MAIN
G
EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE
EXISTING GRADE
PROPERTY LINE
72 i0
PROPOSED GRADE
M
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
per the schedule and specifications on sheet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan.
TYPE C INLET
@)
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE
2 —Tree pruning, WAKE aeration units and reinforced concrete completed per
the schedule and specifications on,3heet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan.
co
z
0
#3 — Root pruning to be completed per the schedule and specifications on sheet
0
#5 of 8 — Grading Plan.
4— Directional drilling of the sanitary sewer line to be completed per the
schedule and specifications on sheet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan.
A
75.00
7COG
73,00
72.00
CROSS-SECTION A-A
HORIZTDNTAL SCALE: 1"=20'
VERTICAL SCALE 1/1-5/
*Refer to Sheet # 5 of 8 — Grading Plan for schedule and specifications
•
•
for the tree preservation measure,
LEGEND
(MI
O
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
I
EXISTING WATER MAIN
G
EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE
EXISTING GRADE
PROPERTY LINE
72 i0
PROPOSED GRADE
M
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
per the schedule and specifications on sheet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan.
TYPE C INLET
@)
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE
*Refer to Sheet # 5 of 8 — Grading Plan for schedule and specifications
•
•
for the tree preservation measure,
I
(MI
O
I
IN
W
1- Tree barricades, hydro-aeration and on grade irrigation system completed
M
C.0
per the schedule and specifications on sheet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan.
2 —Tree pruning, WAKE aeration units and reinforced concrete completed per
the schedule and specifications on,3heet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan.
co
z
0
#3 — Root pruning to be completed per the schedule and specifications on sheet
0
#5 of 8 — Grading Plan.
4— Directional drilling of the sanitary sewer line to be completed per the
schedule and specifications on sheet #5 of 8 — Grading Plan.
CZ)
>
>
E-4
0C
W
z
0
W
LLoz
0-
PD
OCT 2 12009
CITY
so
0.
I
(MI
O
I
W
z
M
C.0
co
z
0)
�4
0
CZ)
>
>
0C
LLJ
LLoz
V)
Uj
cl� W >
0 0 z 0
W
CL
W
09
Uj
Z
< (D Z
Uj
C) W
W C)
CC
z 0
9
Z W
2 M
G) _j M
v) LU
F_
C\1
M
0
F-T-4
6i
Z.
<
V)
() �.4
W
0" �D
z
W
7�
cc
(L
M
0.
SHEET NO.
OF 8
I
(MI
O
I
W
M
co
0)
LLoz
cl� W >
0 0 z 0
W
W
09
Z
< (D Z
C) W
W C)
> <
Z W
2 M
G) _j M
v) LU
F_
C\1
M
C/)
U)
W
V)
_j W
z Er
D <
7�
M
< 0
> W
0 Cn
z0
M
< <
:E
W
LL < <
T— __j I
a Q_ CL
PROJECT #:
100-09
M >-
C' M< C<D a-
ORIGINAL DATE:
5/6/09
C)
Cq Q0
DRAWN BY:
JDB
ILO CL u-
_j _j
SCALE:
1
1"= 20'
1
C'4 co (9 No
SHEET NO.
OF 8