The URL can be used to link to this page

09-02-2003S�l""� ��'' • Community Redevelopment Agency Worksession Item #: �,� � , 9��.� Agenda Cover Memorandum Finai Agenda Item #: _� Meeting Date: 09-02-G3 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan. and that the SUMMARY: officials be authorized to execute same. The purpose of the proposed Downtown Plan is two-fold: to serve as a Special Area Plan in accordance with the Countywide Rules of Pinellas Planning Council and Florida Growth Management Rules and to serve as the Community Redevelopment Plan (CRA) in accordance with Florida's Community Redevelopment Act. The Community Redevelopment Agency has the authority and responsibility to make a recommendation on th:e CRA Plan to the City Commission. The Commission has the authority for the final decision on the Plan. Numerous public meetings have been held on the Downtown Plan. The City Commission directed the Planning Department to incorporate recommendations from various boards at the August Sth Special Meeting. Furtl�ermore, the Commission provided direction on numerous issues and revisions have been made and are attached in Exhibit B. It should be noted, however, that one recommendation made by the Downtown Development Board regarding the need for design flexibility to preserve significant trees is not included. Further research has determined that this flexibility is already available through provisions in the Community Development Code. If the Commission desires to specifically include this issue, the most appropriate place to emphasize it would be in the Design Guidelin�;s. Pinellas County has requested that the City provide tax increment revenue projections for the County's p��rtion at the 50% level for the expanded Community Redevelopment Area (CRA). These projections are attached for information purposes; however, the Downtown Plan supports the County allocating 100% of the tax increment in this area as currently provided for in the original CRA. The City Commission received the Planning Department staff report on the Downtown Plan prior to the Atagust Stn meeting. This report is on file in the City's Clerk's office and details major plan concepts and identifies m�ijor policy issues. It also documents the Downtown Plan's consistency with objectives and policies of the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Reviewed by� Legal Budget u/� ��T Purchasing � Risk Mgmt Info Srvc � Public Works /lf ` DCM/ACM I� Other Originati Gina L.0 User De� Attachments: ORDINANCE NO. 7153-03 Exhibit B to Ordinance Tax Increment Revenue Projections Table Costs Total Current FY Submitted by: City Manager ❑ None A ropriation Code: GJ Printed on re er Funding Snurce: CI � OP Other Exhibit "B" Proposed Amendments to the Clearwater powntown Plan Ordinance No. 7153-03 on lst Reading No. LOCATION/ PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BOARD/AGENCY PAGE OF RECOMMENDING REVISION IN *Strikethroughs indicate deletions and underlines indicate additions REVISION PLAN . Chapx�r � I�%trtidu+�ion 1 Title of Plan Clearwater powntown Redevelonment Plan City Attorney 2 Page 6— first "The purpose of this 20 vear Plan is two-fold: to serve as a Special Pinellas Planning Council sentence of first Area Plan in accordance with the Countywide Rules of Pinellas paragraph County and Florida Growth Management Rules and to serve as a Community Redevelopment Plan in accordance with Florida's Community Redevelopment Act. . ." 3 Pages 6— 7 Revise Periphery Plan to Downtown Clearwater Periphery Plan Planning Deparhnent and revise Downtown Redevelopment Plan to Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan 4 Page 9- Map 1 See Exhibit B(cont'd) — Revise Map 1 Comparison of Existing Pinellas Planning Council and Expanded CRA and Periphery Areas. Highlight Downtown boundary on map and add to legend. Exhibit B— Amendments to Downtown Plan Clearwater Beach. The other ma'or issue im actin Downtown is the deterioration of the commercial and residential area east of the ori�inal CR.A identified as the East Gatewav character district and ortions of the Town Lake Residenhal character distnct m this Plan. Since the East Gatewa is a main atewa into Downtown from the eastern sections of Clearwater its acceleratin decline will have a ma'or affect on the traditional Downtown core. Based on the above factors the ori 'nal boundaries for the CRA were reassessed. The Cit�vrepared a Findin�s and Declarations of Necessitv Analvsis for 201 acres �enerallv located to the east of the CRA includin land overned b the Southeast and Southwest Expansion Areas of the Clearwater powntown Periuherv Plan. The studv clearlv demonstrated the need for revitalization outside of the existin CRA boundanes and documented the followin�Lconditions: • Poor lot lavout relatin¢ to size accessibilitv and use; • Site and environs deterioration • Inadeguate and outmoded buildin� densitv vatterns; • Defective or inadeQuate street confi�urations transportation facilities and parkinQ facilities; • Excessive emerg,encv calls; • Unsanitarv and unsafe environment; • Excessive violations of the Florida Buildin� Code; • Diversitv of ownershiv; • Fallin� lease rates; • High residential and commercial vacancv rates; and • Lack of appreciable increase in the past five vears of the a��egate assessed values The Cit Commission and Board of Count Commissioners ex anded the Clearwater Downtown CRA boundaries to include this area (see Map 1). LAND USE , � . . . , � � , , �-��—Downtown is characterized by a variety of uses with varying intensities and densities. . . . .. 12 Exhibit B (cont'd) AMENDMENT 9, PAGE 49 OF PLAN VISION OF PLAN The intent of the Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan is to provide a flexible framework for the redevelopment of Downtown into a place that attracts people to_ live, work shop and plav The principles that guided the development of the Downtown Plan are as follows: • Downtown is Clearwater's center of activity business and �overnments; • The revitalization of Downtown Clearwater is critical to the Citv's overall success. The Cit will use all tools and incentives available in the CRA to revitalize the Downtown. • Cleveland Street is downtown's "Main Street" and is valued both for its historic character/settin�and as the major retail street; • Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues should be redeveloped as nedestrian oriented streets and in coniunction with Cleveland Street form the maior retail core of Downtown; • Downtown's unique waterfront location should be a focal point for revitalization efforts Views of and access to the water must be nreserved; • The existing City Hall site may be redeveloped with uses other _than �ovemmentaU�ublic uses to facilitate the renewal of Downtown; • Quality urban desi� is critical to new construction and renovated buildin�s; • Automobile-oriented uses should not be nermitted; • The visual and performin� arts are a vital part of Downtown; • An adeguate parkin�supplv must be available coterminous with new uses; and • The elimination of bli tina conditions and the revitalization of the existin�_and expanded CRA are critical to the future health of Downtown. These conce�ts �uided the formation of the Plan's goals obiectives and policies. Thev also rovided the basis for the establishment of character distncts which divide the Downtown i nto s eparate �eog,raphical a reas a nd s et t he p arameters f or r edevelopment. These conc�ts also provided direction for the types of Citv strategies pubhc investments and development incentives that should used to encourage and help facihtate pnvate investment that will make Downtown a place in which all Clearwater residents and tourists can eniov. 13 Exhibit B (cont'd) AMENDMENT 36, PAGE 124 OF PLAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS As outlined in Chapter 2, numerous transportation improvements are currently under construction or have been approved. Others will result from other powntown projects. They are illustrated on Map 11, page 125, and are listed below: • New Memorial Causeway Bridge; • Redesignation of Alternate U.S. Highway 19 from Fort Harrison Avenue to Missouri Avenue and to Myrtle Avenue; and • Redesignation of SR 60 from Cleveland Street to the Court/Chestnut Streets Corridor. After the new Memorial Causeway Brid�e opens the Citv will conduct a traffic analvsis of the Downtown area to fullv evaluate the effect the new bnd�e ahgnment has on Downtown This analvsis will include an evaluation of the intersections and roadwav segments within the Downtown area to deternune the need for transnortahon enhancements due to an increased capacrtv. If it is concluded that improvements are needed the Citv will determine how to best alleviate anv identified �rnpacts on the road network. It should be noted that the traffic analvsis prepared in anticipation of the new Memorial Causeway Bridge construction indicated that the Court Street se�ments between Highland Avenue and Martin Luther Kin� Jr would be de�raded from a level of service LOS of E to F when the new brid e o ens. Due to the urban nature of Downtown and the limited abilitv to make many si�rificant improvements to the street network, the Plan; reco izes that a LOS F is acc table in these hmrted locations. It should be noted that: when the brid�e is opened to traffic the State Road 60 desisnation will shift from Gulf to, Ba Boulevard to Court and Chestnut Streets and anv roadwav improvements to these streets will be implemented bv the Florida Department of Transuortahon. AMENDMENT 40, PAGE 130 OF PLAN RELATIONSHIP OF DOWNTOWN PLAN TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE In addition to the Clearwater Com rehensive Plan the Downtown Plan is the official statement of policv re ardin� the Downtown and in particular with re�ard to the use o:f land and public policies All development of land both pubhc and pnvate undertaken within the Downtown shall be consistent with and further the �oals of the Plan. All nev�i_ or amended develo ment re ulations for powntown shall be consistent wrth and furthe.r the��oals of this Plan. 14 Exhibit B (cont'd) The Plan establishes cateQOries of permitted uses and prohibited uses; based on this Plan, the Community Development Code will enumerate the specific tvpes of permitted and �rohibited uses and their related development standards consistent wrth this Plan. The Plan establishes development potential and hei�ht for each character distnct that will overn all redevelo ment activit . The tools identified in tlus Plan to consider addrtional devel�ment potential (Transfer of Development Rights and the Public Amenities Incentive Pool) may be used to increase the development notential in excess of that �ecified i n t he C haracter D istrict u pon a d etermination t hat t he i ncrease i s c onsistent with and furthers the aoals of this Plan Other than those two tools snecified above, the Plan's statements re ag rdin� development potential allowable and prohibited uses and, maximum height shall not be varied except throu�h an amendment to this Plan. Although the maximum hei�ht established bv the Plan cannot be varied the nrocess to reach maximum permitted hei�hts within the allowable ran�e is �overned bv the Commumtv Develo�ment Code. Anv development regulation not specificall�addressed in the Plan obiectives, policies, character districts and design guidelines shall be �overned bv the Communitv Development Code However should there be anv discreuancv between this Plan and_the Communitv Development Code the goals and policies of this Plan shall Qovern. AMENDMENT 41, PAGE 130 OF PLAN PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL Purpose To overcome the numerous constraints affectinQ redevelopment the Downtown Plan establishes the Public Amenities Incentive Pool to provide an opportunitv for the private sector to gain additional develo�pment potential while assistinQ the public to achieve its redevel�ment goals for powntown Clearwater. Eligible Amenities All,�ropertv within the Downtown Plan boundaries will be eligible to use the Public Amenities Incentive Pool Allocations from the Pool will be available to pro�ects that provide one or more imp,rovements and/or fees in-lieu of certain improvements that ! rovide a direct benefit to Downtown revitalization. There shall be a correlation between the amount of the bonus and the incentive�rovided and the actual bonus amounts shall be set forth in the Community Devel�ment Code The allocation of increased densitv or intensitv throuQh the Pool shall be at the discretion of the Citv as determined throu�h the Communitv Development Code site�lan review process. The tvues of amenities eli�ible for density/intensity bonuses mav include but are not limited to: • Uses in particular locations and/or mixed use projects that further the Plan's maior redevelopment �oals and character district vision; • Da�care facilitv; 15 Exhibit B (cont'd) • Portion of�roiect reserved for Affordable Housing; • Significant Public Space on site; • Public Art on site; • Preservation of a historic buildin� to the Secretarv of Interior's Standardss • Construction ofpublic.parking�,on site; • Cultural or Performin� Arts Facilitv on site; � Contributions to Master Streetscape and Wavfindin� Plan; • Contributions to Coachman Park or Station SQuare Master Plan; • Contributions to Pinellas Trail or connector trails; • Contributions to public parking�facilitv; or • As determined by the Citv Commission. Amount of Development Potential in Pool The amount of floor area and dwelling units available in the Pool is created bv the difference between the development.,potential allowed bv the sum total of the notenhal �rescribed b the 1995 Clearwater powntown Redevelonment Plan: Downtown Clearwater Peripherv Plan Update and the underlyin� land use cate�ones of areas not govemed by one of these Plans as compared to the development potenhal permitted in this Plan The methodology used to determine the amount of the Pool is contained in the Appendix 7 The amount of density/intensitv available in the Pool is as follows: 2 326 dwellin� units and 2 119 667 square feet of floor area for non-residential uses. In the event that either the total number of dwelling units or non-residential sauare feet available in the Pool i s s ubstantially or completelv allocated the Citv shall determine whether or not to allow a conversion of all or part of the remainin� notential between dwelling units and non residential floor area In its sole discretion the Crtv shall establish the conversion methodolo�v. When all of the development potential in the Pool has been allocated the Pool will cease to exist U_pon the Pool's termination the only tool to increase densitv and intensrtv that will remain available is the use of Transfer of Development Ri ts. If the Pool is com�letelv allocated durina the valid term of this Plan the Citv may elect to study alternatives to replenish the Pool The alternatives studied mav include, but are not limited to a reduction in all or Qarts of this Downtown Plan area to create development potential or an evaluation of available facility capacitv which would facilitate increased development �otential in all or �arts of the Downtown Plan area. It is reco�ruzed that replenishin� the Incentives Pool will r�uire the review of the Pinellas Plamm�� Council and the Board of County Commissioners in their capacrtv as the Countvwide Planning Authoritv. 16 Exhibit B (cont'd) Pool Allocation Process The allocation of additional density/intensitv shall be made in coniunction with a site plan a�plication reviewed bv the Community Development Board (CDB) throu _a �,rocess defined in the Communitv Development Code. The CDB will be responsible for ensurin� that al�rojects utilizing the Pool meet the �oals, ob�ectives and pohcies of the Plan and is in kee in with the vision estabhshed for the character distnct in which the ro�ect is located. Develo ment otential obtained throu h the Pool shall not be transferred to anv other site under anv circumstance. AMENDMENT 42, PAGE 130 OF PLAN �;��: Amend the Community Development Code to establish the Public Amenities Incentives Pool. ''' '' '''' D '''� ""'°"''�� '" "'' `"'��+," � 7 � ' � 1 � �' F �1, 7 � .. � �1,; u Y ,....... ... ----r---------- — .. �ir2c�ca�vcr�cs, + 1:..�;�a�l +,.. � 7'1.,. • e F ..;1;+..• ��''T � � � � D 1 1' A,-f .. �;+� � � � � � � - ' � - - � _ _ _ __ - - ' � - � - - - _ _ - � - - - - - _ � - - 17 Exhibit B (cont'd) AMENDMENT 46, PAGE 163 OF PLAN TAX INCREMENT REVENUE PROJECTIONS Introduction Chapter 163, Part III, Florida Statutes, authorizes the County to approve the use of t� increment revenues for community redevelopment. According to the statute, the assessed valuation of the parcels noted on a certified tax roll within the CRA is "frozen" as of a specified date; after this base year, all future increase in tax revenues may be used by the CRA for approved redevelopment projects. These revenues may be used to purchase property, improve property, or used as security for bonds. In t he case o f t he C ity of C learwater's r ecently approved e xpanded C RA, t he C ounty must first approve the CRA's Redevelopment Plan, and upon adoption of this Plan by the City and County, a request can be made to the County by the CRA for the creation of a. Redevelopment Trust Fund. Prior to establishing a Redevelopment Trust Fund, the CRA must (according to Florida. State Statute 163.386) submit a list of each parcel, by parcel I.D. number that lies within. the CRA district to the Pinellas County Appraiser's office. The Appraiser's office will. certify the list and prepare to code each parcel for the base year to be established when a, trust fund is approved. Historical Overview In its 20 vear historv the CRA has been a criticallv effective tool in positionin� downtown for redevelopment In the 1980s the tool was heavilv used to _ nurchase ke�r real estate prouerties and conduct multiple capital urotects. A slowm real estate marke�, in the 1990s combined with the loss of several ro erties from the tax roll due tcr institutional investment produced a dramatic drop in the tax increment affectin� the CRA's abilitv to imulement maior proiects However, dunng tYus tune, the CR� continued to facilitate projects downtown concentrating on parkin� alternatives and beautification�roiects The CRA is currentiv seeing visible signs of improvement with increases in ro ert values in each of the last three ears. Planned and future redevelo_pment proiects couuled with the Citv's infrastructure improvements will serve tc> develou the t� base further. The City of Clearwater's CRA was established in 1981, with the taacable property value totaling $84,658,490 frozen in 1982. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenues commenced in 1983 with approximately $56,000. The CRA increment increased quite rapidly through 1989 with revenue at approximately $801,000. The tax increment peaked during the period 1989 through 1991 and fell quite dramatically through to 1998 wit:h revenue down to $251,000. Since 1999, the increment has continued to rise. Most recently, tax increment in 2003 rose to $840,549. ^ ", +'' + + �, 18 Exhibit B (cont'd) Between its peak in 1989 and its low in 1998, the tax roll lost roughly $54 million in value. This period of decline may be explained by the fact that multiple buildings within the CRA were taken off the tax roll, including the original Mass Brothers Department Store (now the Harborview Center), the Fortune Federal Savings and Loan Building purchased by Pinellas County, and the Oaks of Clearwater Retirement Center and Nursing Facility. These transactions alone accounted for over $22 million dollars of valuation. Additionally, in 1993, many Church of Scientology properties totaling roughly $24 million were taken off the tax roll. Overall, throughout the last 20 years, the tax roll experienced an average annual increase of 3.21 percent. The benefits of having TIF in place during these years cannot be overlooked, as it allowed the CRA to spend the ensuing years stabilizing the Downtown area in preparation for a major redevelopment program which is now underway. The CRA has collected a cumulative total of $9 9 million in increment revenues since its inception in 1982 The ma�ority of these funds ($7.9 million) were used for £�e��e� ca rtal projects and im�rovements �� s�e including_t�ie land acquisitions. Administration costs have totaled $1 6 million (16% of revenues) with revenues from the sale ofproperties fundin�parkin� beautification and other incentive pro�'ams. �e , , , • Many of the CRA's c�ital projects occurred in the 1980s Durin� these vears, the CRA concentrated on acquirin�properties to eliminate slum and bli�ht condrtions downtown as well as finding viable uses for properties that became vacant. The CRA was instrumental in acquiring ke�parcels such as the City's Municipal Services Buildin� and Harborview Center sites In addition the CRA plaved a maior role in advancinQ parlcin� atternatives includin� the Station ScLuare parkin¢ lot and Park Street Garaee. Table 10 below identifies the CRA's Capital Im�rovement Proiects over the first twentv vears of its historv. In the 1990s the CRA focused its efforts on investments that spurred private development especiallv by nroviding parkin� solutions for downtown. The CRA has reimbursed the Citv parking svstem so that free parkin� in two crtv lots and on weekends was provided The CRA has also offered parkin� incentives that have been successful in retaining high profile com�anies with over 100 emplovees. Furthermore, the CRA has subsidized the Jollev Trolley,. a non-profit trolley system to provide reduced rate serv_ice between the downtown and the beach. The CRA has also been activelv involved in the b�autification of downtown. The CRA has coordinated a Fa�ade Improvement Grant Pro�ram that has nrovided over $100,000 worth of exterior im�rovements to 36 buildin�s in the Downtown. Additionallv, the CRA�rovided fundin� for the Cleveland Street Streetscape in past vears as well as the renovation and beautification of downtown parks. 19 Exhibit B (cont'd) In the last four years, the CRA has paved the way for significant private investment. Two examples include the CGI complex and Mediterranean Village Towhomes. The construction of the 50,907 square foot CGI (formerly IMR) office building with a 77,889 research and development facility reflects a$50 million investment. 5imilarly, with the Mediterranean Village in the Park Townhomes, the CRA purchased the land and is paying impact fees, permit fees, utility connections fees and stormwater fees for this 100- unit residential project worth $18 million next to the City's Town Lake. These are examples of CRA funds strategically used to eliminate slum and blight conditions and redevelop these sites into viable properties. Table 10 Community Redevelopment Agency Schedule of Capital Outlay and Improvements Fiscal Years 1982 - 2001 Enhancement and beautification of downtown narks includin¢ varkinQ area west of Citv Hall Bavfront Tennis Comvlex and Coachman Park AccLuisirion of�rouerty for JK Financial proiec� Clearwater Sauare complex S E Corner of Garden Ave and Cleveland Street (Atnuml Construction of Park Street parkin� ¢az'age with 195 uublic oarkin� svaces Revision of downtown redevelonment ulan . Landscaping of Pazk Street varkinQ �araee AccLuisition of Bileore prouerty bounded bv East Avenue, Pierce Street. Mvrtle Avenue and Park Street (Locarion of new MSB Buildm�l Coachman Park Imnrovements - extensive renovation includine terrain modification brick walkways lands�ape materials and unQahon. Cleveland Street streetsca,pe vroiect - oak trees decorative brick, tree �ates and ards for the 500 600 and 700 street blocks Phase 1 Coachman Park bandshell proiect - CRA nortion of entire vroiect Ac�uisition of CETA buildin� site - 1180 Cleveland Downtown sidewalk proiect - antique lamu vole liQhtinQ fixtures Cleveland Street streetscape protect - decorative brick vlanters trees - the 400 throu�h 700 street blocks, Phase 2 Downtown electrical improvements 20 Exhibit B (cont'd) FY 1984 - 1986 �_., 9,989 FY 1985 $ 1,Oi�3,362 FY 1985 - 1986 FY 1986 FY 1986 FY 1986 FY 1987 FY 1987 FY 1987 FY 1988 FY 1988 FY 1988 - 1990 FY 1988 $ 1 •241.057 �_ 5.825 $ 23,375 �6,91,852 $ 100.011 �_ 27,000 �_ 12,061 $ 450.000 $ 17.647 $ 342.555 �_. 7,500 Acauisition of Clearwater Towers MAS1 project site (Starion Sa. Parkl Devel�ment of Cleveland Street minipark adjacent to new Clearwater Towers Building f Station Square Park) Purchase of Maas Brothers vroperty (Harborview/Steinmart) Purchase of Kravis provertv (Station Square Parkin� Lot) Parkin.g lot expansion - Kravis proQerty�Station Square Parkin� Lot) Dimmitt �Lroperty_purchase (Mediterranean Villa�e Townhomes) FY 1989 $ 229,278 FY 1989 - 1990 $ 230,000 FY 1992 $ 1,926,710 FY 1992 $ 357,058 FY 1993 $ 67,518 FY 2000 $ 1,171328 $ 7,994,126 The redevelo„pment of downtown Clearwater is at a critical point in its historv. In order to revitalize downtown additional housin� units and infrastructure improvements are needed CRA tax increment revenues are crucial to entice private investrnent and nrovide incentives t hat m ake a proi ect f easible A e xample i s t he C itv's r ecent s election o f a devel�er for an infill condominium and retail project adiacent to Station Sauare Park. The CRA plans to use TIF funds to assist this project. In coniunction with the Citv's capital im�rovement pro�am these investments will encoura�e private develotiment and pave the way for continued downtown redevelopment TIF will be one of the tools that will make these proiects successful Redevelopment Objectives On a very conservative basis, the original and expanded CRA district is projected to increase in value substantially over the next 20 to 30 years. This is driven primarily by the accelerating demand for new urban housing within the Downtown and adjacent beaches, and the strategic economic development goals and objectives of the City Commission. The Commission envisions a"destination" Downtown to be enjoyed by both residents in the region and tourists to our beaches. This redevelopment strategy was implemented by the City in 2002, and details the investment opportunities now available on several key redevelopment parcels and a large array of prime infill parcels. Several potential projects are described below: • Calvary Baptist Church "Bluff' Parcels on Osceola Avenue—Accounts for 137,510 square feet or 3.16 acres, this parcel is designated in the Downtown Core District for a FAR of 4.0 or 70 units per acre, which would generate up to 550,040 square feet of redevelopment or over 220 residential units. Additional square footage of retail uses and residential units may b e available through the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. City Hall on Osceola Avenue—Contains approximately 130,000 square feet or 2.98 acres, this parcel currently houses City Hall, but the Commission has indicated that it would be made available for redevelopment if it were a key 21 Exhibit B (cont'd) component of a quality redevelopment proposal with the adjacent parcels. This parcel could be developed ., ' with up to 520,000 square feet or over 208 housinQ units. Additional square footage of retail uses and residential units may be available through the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. Sale of the City Hall site will require approval of a referendum by Clearwater voters. .�ee Arnold/Brown Parcel at Drew Street/Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues— An announced redevelopment site containing 70,131 square feet or 1.61 acres. According to published reports, the developer envisions a high-rise condominium, a boutique hotel and ground floor retail uses. Potential for development on this site is over 280 000 sguare feet 112 units or 152 hotel rooms. • AmSouth Block between Osceola Avenue, Fort Harrison Avenue, Cleveland Street and Drew Street or "Superblock" Parcel—Contains one large parcel, along with a few smaller properties. In total, the greater parcel � could ultimately contain approximately �A;A98 178.000 square feet or 4.$� 4.1 acres. Development.potential at this site could be over 712 000 s4uare feet or 287 units. • Harborview Parcel at Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue—This City-owned "� 77,000 square foot or �--1_8-acre parcel, currently houses a 54,000 square foot Stein Mart Department Store, the City's civic and conference center space, the Pickles Plus Restaurant along with an adjoining small parking lot. It is envisioned that some time in the future, Stein Mart would be relocated to another Downtown site, and the structure demolished for redevelopment as a major mixed-use development with a combination of retail, entertainxnent, hotel, and conference destination space. The Commission has interest in redeveloping the parcel if a quality developer can be identified who would meet the stringent requirements for redevelopment on this critical parcel. Sale of the Harborview site will require approval of a referendum by Clearwater voters. • Station Squaxe Parking Lot Infill Parcel on Cleveland Street—Currently used as a. City surface parking lot, this prime redevelopment parcel is owned by the CRA. and has been offered to the public for redevelopment. The parcel contains �9 42,124 squaxe feet or &8� 0.97 acres, and is envisioned as a site for a garage structure (including public parking), ^�� retail restaurant, and residential. units. Development potential at this site could be over 168 000 square feet or 67. units. • Town Lake Area between Myrtle and Missouri Avenues—This Downtown area; , surrounds the new urban Town Lake that has recently been completed by the City. The initial private redevelopment project in the are� under construction is the 100-unit Mediterranean Village in the Park townhouse project. This area has been identified by developers as a prime location for future infill townhouse and apartment projects due to its proximity to the beaches, regional employment centers, and the fact that a housing product can still be 22 Exhibit B (cont'd) developed at a$150,000 to $300,000 price range, whieh accommodates the needs of many young professionals, young families and empty nesters. It is also envisioned that the adjacent Town L ake Business Park District might attract additional professional office users to expand the campus office setting now in place at the CGI office complex. East Gateway—Between Missouri and Highland Avenues and lying within the recently expanded CRA district are multiple infill parcels that over time will become attractive for redevelopment. Tax Increment Revenue Projections Based on this overview, it is evident that the CRA has the potential for developing several million square feet of development over the next two decades, including the attraction of up to 1,000 new urban housing units in the next five to ten vears in the downtown core which will �� act as a catalyst for a substantial amount of new office use, retail and entertainment establishments. If all of these projects described above are realized, the increase in the tax roll could be upwards of $390 million. However, while e� opportunities are outstanding, it is the intent of the CRA to proceed forward cautiously with our TIF projections. The TIF projections are calculated separately for the original CRA and the expanded CRA because the base years for the property values are different. The CRA envisions continuing to use Tax Increment Financing dollars for capital projects in the original and expanded CRA. TIF is identified as one of the funding sources for several capital and infrastructure improvement projects outlined in the Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) section of this plan. These projects include the Cleveland Street, Fort Harrison, and Gulf to Bay Streetscapes and the Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Highland Avenue Gateway Intersection. Tn addition, TIF will be used for paying impact fees, "buying in" of public parking in private projects, assembling redevelopment sites, purchasing land and/or buildings, and fa�ade improvement grants. Tax Increment Revenue Projections for the Original CRA District The tax increment projections for the original CRA district are based on a yearly variable percentage increase of the tax roll valuation over a 30-year period. Increases in annual percentages reflect estimates of when major projects, described above, come on line. For the purposes of these projections, -•�° ��°a +'��* the city and county millage rates remain constant. The base year for calculating this increment is 1982. An estimate from 2004 through 2033 projects that property values will rise and that new projects will come on line resulting in $195 million in property value added to the tax roll. This corresponds to a cumulative tax increment of over $64 million over 30 years. Again, millage increases, additional new development, and increases in assessed property values � mav result in greater returns. 23 Exhibit B (cont'd) A summary table of the tax increment financin� projections follows detailing the citv and countv nortions of the revenues. Tax Increment Revenue Projections for the Expanded CRA District Similar to the original CRA district, the expanded CRA district TIF estimate is based on a yearly variable percentage increase of the tax roll valuation over a 30-year period. Given that this area is predominantly residential, it is not expected that the values in the area will rise significantly. In fact, �e the estimated a� annual average increase of the tax roll is e€ 1.42 percent. Property values are expected to rise and new projects will come on line resulting in a$37.9 million in property value added to the tax roll. This corresponds to a cumulative tax increment of over $7 million over 30 years. The key to successfully redeveloping and stabilizing the new CR.A Expansion District is to maintain the city's and county's TIF allocation at the 100% level. The CRA anticipates needing to allocate TIF dollars from the original district to "leverage" redevelopment in the expansion area. Any reduction in county TIF allocation would negatively impact the success of downtown Clearwater. A summary table of the tax increment financing projections follows detailin� the citv and count�portions of the revenues (pages 169 - 170). 24 Exhibit B (cont'd) �� T T o t Ti�irn.+nixR D.��inn+:�+ b J lly' 1!'� ..�...+ ..•'�c> D.�lo..e.l.,,�..+ «t A v.n.. r �n v n �;,.., � ,,.,, �nn�__ �� ». � �..J��_..� __ ____ — _ � �� Q1 c2 ��4 �4n �;$,q.g-�Qg , > > �AA4 Q i c � Q �� n � n �;$�6-$�6 > > � �-� Qi�� nn� �� ,� > > �� Q� n�n ��c > > �;°� �99-� Q > > z Q � 04 > > ��° �8�$ Qi Q� n�c �on Qi �n� n�� > > �°°� �g Qio� ��n n�� Qi �� Q� > > �°°-r �A Q�n4 c�� c� et ci� ��a > > �� $-1� Q�i Q ocn n�� Qi ��n �o� > > �°''n°� �� n4 n4� Qi �c� �� > > �z� �� Q��n c�o �n-► Q� o�c onn > > �t° �4 Q�z� ��n c�� Q� Q�Z �� > > �°'�� Q�nn ni c i no Qi nc� nn4 > > ��°° �9� Q��Q Q�c ncn Q� ni i �04 > > �T°° �$�-� Q�c� Q�� c� Q� n�� n > > �°t �g Q�co �cn o�� Q� i�.+ ocn > > �� Q��n �� onz Q� i �Q �n4 > > �',�° �$�A Q��o �� n�n Q� �� n� > > �°T Q� �� n� �� $� Q�Qn �n� �n� a�� n� � f 7 �j�% V��7T �� Q�QC on� z�� n�c inn > > �r°° �$�4 Q��i ��n �o� � c�c � n� > > ;��z �� Q�n� n cz � nz > > �8�r-� �� Q�n� nrn ��c Q� �� nc� > > �"'T,- �'� Q�no n�n �n� " Q� �c� �o� > > ��° �$�8 Q�� c�cn �� z Q� Q�n �m > > �';°°z �� e�� o�� onc � �n� o�n > > �°°�� A�9 Q��Q ni� ��i Q� �QC Qi� > > �� ia�-�- , , �-;e�s � e� ,�Q �� , , �-+�� ,� Q�n4 c�� o ez �� nn� > > ��z Q�A ^I1 � 1 A'1 ! f A.�l.�l't'.. T D 11 tT.,l,,.. �i.+�... �nn� Q1OC 72G (1Z(1 �- i f f A ., V.�.,.-1.� 7..�.......�.. i.. V..1., . b ✓ y-�� • � • � � � 25 Exhibit B (cont'd) T.,-r-scvic°�r T T o t L"«., D..n«....+� „a � '� � 1 1 1 � � � � � - - �VV"F � �"'� 1::11G"r tt�Vb z:tri/� i�-� �-� � � Y.•�V-t't v �� i �8 �-� �� 4 �5 �A� �A�-� �9 �&38 ��- �� • i � � • • � • � � • • � • � ' �. .� . � . � _ � . . � •� � � .. � •� •� � •�� . �� s.. �� _ •. � , � . � � • • • . � � � � �� . � . . _.• ., •. ; . . , _ ... • . . . • .. • �� • _• � . • •. . �� . . �� 26 Exhibit B (cont'd) �1��Tt . i � _ • � � � � � � � • • � � ..� . �• •�� • . . � _ � � .. � • • � � • � . .. „ . _.. . . . �,. ,, . �, . , . •�i .� � Table 11 Tax Increment Revenue Proiections Ori�inal Community Redevelopment Area 30-Year Proiection from 2003-2033 Total Tax Citv Taxes at Countv Taxes Increment (95% of Year Tax Roll Valuation 100% at 100% DDB Taxes Taxes) 2003 $153,278,680 394 772 421 397 68 620 840 549 2004 $157,877.040 421 226 449 635 73 219 896 876 2005 $163,402,737 453 016 483 568 78 744 964 562 2006 $169,938,846 490 618 523 707 85 280 $1,044,625 2007 $177,586,094 534 613 570 668 92 928 $1,138,298 2008 $186.465,399 585 695 625 196 101 807 $1,247.063 2009 $196,720.996 644 696 688 176 112 063 $1,372,687 2010 $208.524.256 712 600 760 660 123 866 $1,517,269 2011 $218.950,469 772 582 824 687 134 292 $1,644.983 2p�2 $227,7pg,4g7 g22 g67 878 470 143 050 $1,752,262 2013 $234,539.742 862 267 920 421 149 881 $1,835.940 2014 $239,230.537 889 253 949 227 154 572 $1.893.399 2015 $244,015.148 916 779 978 609 159 357 $1,952,008 2016 $248.895.450 944 855 $1.008,579 164 237 $2.011,788 2017 $253.873,359 973 493 $1,039.149 169 215 $2.072,764 2018 $258.950.827 $1.002,704 $1.070,329 174 292 $2.134.959 2019 $264,129,843 $1,032.499 $1,102,134 179 471 $2.198.398 2020 $269,412,440 $1.062,889 1 134 574 184 754 $2,263.107 2021 $274,800.689 $1.093.888 $1,167.663 190142 $2.329.109 2022 $280,296,703 $1.125.507 $1,201,414 195 638 $2.396,431 2023 $285,902.637 $1.157,758 $1.235,840 201244 $2.465,100 2p24 $291,620,689 $1.190.654 $1.270,955 206 962 $2.535,142 2025 $297,453,103 $1,224.207 $1.306,772 212 795 $2.606,585 2026 $303,402.165 $1,258,432 $1,343.305 218 744 $2.679,457 2027 $309,470,209 $1.293,342 $1,380,569 224 812 $2,753,786 2028 $315,659,613 $1,328,949 $1,418,578 231001 $2.829.602 2029 $321,972,805 $1,365,269 $1.457,347 237 314 �2,906,934 2030 $328,412,261 $1,402.315 1 496 892 243 754 $2.985.813 2031 $334,980.506 $1,440,103 $1.537,228 250 322 $3,066.269 2032 $341.680,116 $1,478,645 $1,578,370 257 022 $3,148,335 2033 348 513 719 1 517 959 1 620 335 263.855 3,232,042 Cumulative Total $30,394,551 $32,444,453 $5,283,252 $64,716,143 Addition in Tax Roll Value since 2003 Averaqe Yearlv Increase in Value Assumptions 1 Base vear is 1982 at $84,658.490 2 Countv and citv millaae rate is constant 27 Exhibit B (cont'd) $195,235,039 2.78% Table 12 Tax Increment Revenue Proiections Expanded Communitv Redevelopment Area 30.Year Proiection from 2003-2033 Citv Taxes at Countv Taxes at Total Tax Increment Year Tax Roll Valuation 100% 100°/a (95% of Taxes) 2003 $72,258,935 Base Year� 2004 $72.981,524 157 4 437 8 165 2005 $73.711,340 8 356 8 919 16 411 2006 $75.185.566 16 837 17 972 33 069 2007 $76.689.278 25 488 27 207 50 060 2008 $78.989,956 38 724 1 335 76 056 2009 $81.359,655 52 356 55 888 102 832 2010 $82.986.848 61 718 65 880 121 218 2011 $84,646.585 71 266 76 073 139 972 2012 $85.916,284 78 571 83 870 154 318 2013 $87.205,028 85 985 91 784 168 880 2014 $88,513.103 93 510 99 817 183 661 2015 $89,840.800 101 148 107 970 198 663 2016 $91.188,412 108 901 116 246 213 890 2017 $92.556.238 116 770 124 646 229 345 2018 $93.944.582 124 758 133 172 245 033 2019 $95.353.750 132 864 141 825 260 955 2020 $96,784,056 141 093 150 609 277 117 2021 $97.751,897 146 661 156 552 288 053 2022 $98.729.416 152 285 162 555 299 098 2023 $99,716,710 157 965 168 618 310 254 2024 $100,713.877 163 701 174 742 321 521 2025 $101.721,016 169 495 180 927 332 901 2026 $102.738.226 175 347 187 173 344 395 2027 $103.765.608 181 258 193 482 356 003 2028 $104.803.265 187 228 199 855 367 728 2029 $105,851,297 193 257 206 291 379 570 2030 $106.909,810 199 346 212 791 391 531 2031 $107,978,908 205 497 219 356 403 611 2032 $109,058.697 211 709 225 987 415 812 2033 110 149 284 217,983 232,685 28,134 Cumulative Total $3.624,234 $3,868,664 7 118 254 Addition in Tax Roll Value since 2003 Averaqe Yeariv Increase in Value Assumptions 1. Base vear is 2003 2. Countv and citv millaqe rate is constant 28 Exhibit B (cont'd) $37,890,349 1.42% AMENDMENT 47, PAGE 174 OF PLAN APPENDIX 2 DOWNTOWN MILESTONES Actions and Public Review of this Redevelopment Plan August 8, 2002 City Commission approves Findings of Necessity for Expanded Community Redevelopment Area . . . . . . . . . . . . .. July 30, 2003 Second Public Input Meeting on Design Guidelines AuQUSt 4 2003 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Meeting on Downtown Plan August 5 2003 Special Citv Commission Worksession on Downtown Plan August 6 2003 Downtown Development Board Meeting on Downtown Desi�n Guidelines �� September 2, 2003 �� September 4, 2003 Community Redevelopment Agency Public Hearing to review the Downtown Plan City Commission Public Hearing to review the Downtown Plan (lst Reading of Ordinance) September 18, 2003 City Commission Public Hearing to review the Downtown Plan (2nd Reading of Ordinance) .. . � � _ - . .. � � � - - . • . _ .. � _ . . . October 7 2003 Pinellas Countv Board of Countv Commissioners Public Hearing to review the Downtown Plan as the Redevelopment Plan and delegate authority to the City to establish a Redevelopment Trust Fund 29 Exhibit B (cont' d) October 13 2003 Communitv Redevelopment Agencv Public Hearing to recommend establishin� a Redevelopment Trust Fund/TIF for the expanded CRA October 15, 2003 Pinellas Planning ��ssie� Council Public Hearing on Downtown Plan as a Special Area Plan October 16 2003 Citv Commission Public Hearing to establish a Redevelovment Trust Fund/TIF ordinance (lst ReadinQ of Ordinance) , f� November 4, 2003 Countywide Planning Authority Public Hearing on Downtown Plan as a Special Area Plan November 6 2003 Citv Commission Public Hearing to establish a Redevelonment Trust Fund/TIF ordinance (2nd Readin� of Ordinance) November 18 2003 Board of Countv Commissioners hearin� to authorize the Citv to use the Countv's portion of the TIF 30 Exhibit B (cont'd) AMENDMENTS 49, PAGE 204 DOWNTOWN-GATEWAY STRATEGIC ACTION PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2002-2003 ` Program Project Evaluation $(e) Status Memorial Causewa Brid e x 64.2M O en to traffic 1Q 2004 Main Libra x • 20.2M O enin Earl 2004 Town Lake Construction x 7.3M Suggestions for names being accepted/Grand Opening Fall 2003 Fort Harrison Avenue Improvements x 5.397M Construction started from projecYs southern boundary. DOT working with the city to ' ensure night lane closure doesn't impact traffic. East Street Railroad Tracks Mediterranean Village (Public Investment) Super Block Property Update Downtown Redevelopment Plan Character District/Urban Design Guidelines Streetscape and Wayfinding Slgnage Gateway Redevelopment Findings of Necessit� Gateway CRA Expansion Redevelopment Plan : �i CSX 2.5 Completed 1 M Phase I broke ground 8/02, expected completion of Ph�ec 1 _ 1!1/f1Z x In uiries bein received x AmSouth building purchased by 400 Cleveland LLC in 3/03. Earlier this year, the Commission agreed to sell the city owned parking lots on Drew between Ft. Harrison 8� Osceola to Colliers Arnold if they moved forward with their mixed use project at corner o Drew & Osceola. The Commission will be asked to approve the contract for the sale of this property on 7/17. x 0 0 x x Downtown and Bluff Parking Study � x 31 �f Exhibit B (cont'd) Draft released for public input. Presentations scheduled to DDB 7/2/03, CDB 7/15/03, CRA 8/18 & Commission 9/4/03 Part of Downtown Plan 28K Commission approved contract to Bellomo-Herbert for construction drawings for wa�nding signage. Drawings to be complete 9/03. Signage to be installed by 1/04 (750K). BCC a roved 10/29/02 Presented to Commission. Part of Downtown Plan above. 98K Completed. Report received & presented to Commission in .June 2002. Commission endorsed the implernentation of the recommendations. reduced meter times, reorganized & increased enforcement, Streetscape Plan adds estimated 75 spaces. Looking at options. ` AMENDMENTS 49, PAGE 204 DOWNTOWN-GATEWAY STRATEGIC ACTION PROGRAM . Fi�r_al Year 20�2-2003 (Cont'dl Program Project Evaluation Downtown Property Maintenance Marketing Downtown Business Retention Fall Color on Cleveland Street Homeless Alternatives Guideway Phase II Marina Multiplex Theater Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Parking Garage Location Myrtle Avenue Reconstruction Clearwater West End Connection (DOT Pinellas Trail Connection Define Marketable Properties for Lease Rptail Exnertise/Storefront Workshop On Street Parking by Employee: Develop Connection with: Pinellas County Government 0 . � x x x x TOTAL 2002 Program Project x x Faith Based Organizations Banks Main Street Retail Signage Downtown Publication (quarterly Main Street U G! � x x date 32 x Exhibit B (cont'd) x x x S�atus 20K 2,500 copies of the Marketing brochure distiributed. Follow- up cails to be made to developers. Attending ICSC Conference in August 2003. Ongoing. City stait coordinating 6usiness Growth Meetings. Downtown Forum created with Chamber, City, Main Street & Downtown Merchants Assoc. Main Street volunteers visiting businesses. --- _ - Ongoing. Change out of lants schedu4ed 2x year._ -- -- -- --- --. : . _ _•:_: . - .. . . ; On-going. Public/private I Task Force created 10/02. ' Working with Pinellas County Homeless Coalition on a proposed Nor#h County Inebriate Family Care/ Emergency Center. Commission approved contract to Grimail Crawford for Phase II of the stud . 99K Consultant hired to assess the feasibility and permitting process assaciated with the future design and development af a waterfront marina. Proposed schedule for permit in 2004 and construction in 2005: Status Under anal sus. 13.3M Contract awa�d expected in Se tember 2UO3. IOT 3 Underwa b staff. Under anal s�s. 10K Planned for late summer. Enforcement increased. Meeting held 3/03. City Proclamation presented to Countv in Ma�v 2003. I Work with local bank seeking downtown s .ace. 24K AMENDMENTS 49, PAGE 204 DOWNTOWN-GATEWAY STRATEGIC ACTION PROGRAM ; Fiscal Year 2003-2004 (Cont'd Program Project Eva�wation $(e) Status Station Square Parking Lot Mixed Use Infill Project x 1 M Two RFP proposals received. (Public investment) Selection made and commission will be asked for approval to negotiate with The Beck Group (18M). Art District x Steering Group formed with artists. Planning Department preparing Art District ordinance 10/03. Charter Review x . Underway by Charter Review Committee. Qualit Evenin Restaurant s X Pro e Owners Association X Public Art Ordinance x Cultural Arts Division preparing Publ'ic Art Ordinance. Waterfront Design x Conceptual design of future waterfront park approved by Commission in June 2003. Tota12003 17.3M --- ----- _ __- _--- _ . _ Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Program Project Eva�uation � S(e) Status Public Art Pro'ect s X Remove Industrial Pro erties X Ke Real Estate Develo ment O ortunities/Strate ies x Drew Street Corridor Stud x Marborview Lon Ran e O tions X Alle s for Pedestrian Connection X _ ___.___ 33 Exhibit B (cont'd) Tax Increment Revenue Projections for the Expanded Community Redevelopment Area 30-Year Projection with County Taxes at 50% County Taxes at Total Tax Increment Year Tax Roll Valuation City Taxes at 100% 50% (95% of Taxes) 2003 $72,258,935 Base Year 2004 $72,981,524 $4,157 $2,219 $6,057 2005 $73,711,340 $8,356 $4,460 $12,175 2006 $75,185,566 $16,837 $8,986 $24,532 2007 $76,689,278 $25,488 $13,603 $37,137 2008 $78,989,956 $38,724 $20,668 $56,422 2009 $81,359,655 $52,356 $27,944 $76,285 2010 $82,986,848 $61,718 $32,940 $89,925 2011 $84,646,585 $71,266 $38,036 $103,837 2012 $85,916,284 $78,571 $41,935 $114,480 2013 $87,205,028 $85,985 $45,892 $125,283 2014 $88,513,103 $93,510 $49,908 $136,248 2015 $89,840,800 $101,148 $53,985 $147,377 2016 $91,188,412 $108,901 $58,123 $158,673 2017 $92,556,238 $116,770 $62,323 $170,139 2018 $93,944,582 $124,758 $66,586 $181,776 2019 $95,353,750 $132,864 $70,913 $193,588 2020 $96,784,056 $141,093 $75,304 $205,578 2021 $97,751,897 $146,661 $78,276 $213,690 2022 $98,729,416 $152,285 $81,278 $221,884 2023 $99,716,710 $157,965 $84,309 $230,160 2024 $100,713,877 $163,701 $87,371 $238,519 2025 $101,721,016 $169,495 $90,463 $246,961 2026 $102,738,226 $175,347 $93,587 $255,487 2027 $103,765,608 $181,258 $96,741 $264,099 2028 $104,803,265 $187,228 $99,927 $272,797 2029 $105,851,297 $193,257 $103,145 $281,582 2030 $106,909,810 $199,346 $106,396 $290,455 2031 $107,978,908 $205,497 $109,678 $299,416 2032 $109,058,697 $211,709 $112,994 $308,468 2033 $110,149,284 $217,983 $116,342 $317,609 Cumulative Total $3,624,234 $1,934,332 $5,280,638 Addition in Tax Roll Value since 2003 Average Yearly Increase in Value Assumptions 1. Base year is 2003 2. County and city millage rate is constant $37,890,349 1.42% � � � � �! � � LL 0 } �� U Interoffice Correspondence Sheet TO: BILL HORNE, CITY MANAGER FROM: CYNDI TARAPANI, PLANNING DIRECTOR G� � RE: DOWNTOWN PLAN DATE: AUGUST 29, 2003 Upon our iinal internal review of the proposed amendments to the Clearwater powntov�m Redevelopment Plan, we identified several revisions necessary to fully implement the Plan. I request that the City Commission review and approve these revisions as part of the scheduled first reading of the ordinance adopting the Downtown Plan. The specific items are listed below. AMENDMENT REVISED LANGUAGE 9 On Page 13 of Exhibit B, add new bullet # 3 under section titled "Vision c}f Plan" as follows: The development of a varietv of residential projects to attract new residents to Downtown is critical to the success of a revitalized Downtown. 15 Page 52- ��l�e Policv 9 No change to amendment language. 16 The Harborview/Coachman Park parcel is located west of Osceola Avenue from Drew Street south to Cleveland Street and is currentiv developed wit:h uses open to the public. The City will therefore onlv contemplate redevelopment containing uses open to the public such as restaurant, retail, convention center, hotel and/ or entertainment uses within the footprint of th�e existing Harborview Center. AMENDMENT REVISED LANGUAGE � Cont'd. 17 For the long term, the existing footprint of the Harborview Center may be redeveloped solely with restaurant, retail, convention center, hotel and/ or entertainment uses so the site remains open and accessible to the public. 41 On Page 14 of Exhibit B, add the following as the first two bullets in the section titled "Eligible Amenities:" � Residential uses in the Downtown Plan area: � Ground floor retail in the Downtown Care Character District• On Page 16 of Exhibit B, change the word "will" to "may" in the fourth paragraph of the section titled "Amount of Development Potential in Pool so that sentence now reads: It is reco�nized that replenishin� the Incentives Pool mav require the review of the Pinellas Plannin� Council and the Board of Countv Commissioners in their canacitv as the (�'rnmtvw;rlP Pla,,,,;,,a A„thr„-;t� cc: Garry Brumback, Assistant City Manager Ralph Stone, Assistant City Manager Pam Akin, City Attorney � � ORDINANCE NO. 7153-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORlDA, RELATING TO THE DOWNTOWN PLAN WHICH ENCOMPASSES LAND PREVIOUSLY GOVERNED BY THE CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER PERIPHERY PLAN AND ADDITIONAL LAND CONTAINED IN THE NEWLY EXPANDED DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; ADOPTING AN AMENDED DOWNTOWN PLAN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has the authority pursuant to Rules Governing the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended, Section 2.3.3.8.5, ta adopt and enforce a specific plan for redevelopment in an urban center in accordance with the Central Business District plan category, and said Section r equires t hat a s pecial a rea p lan t herefore b e approved by the local government; and WHEREAS, the City Commission approved the 1995 Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan o n A ugust 17, 1995 a nd t he D owntown P eriphery P lan u pdate o n A pril 19, 2001, and it is advisable to update and amend said Plans to reflect both current conditions and current pNanning principles and stimulate and support both specific and general private sector projects; and WHEREAS, the Plan has been reviewed by the Pinellas County and the local pllanning agency, t he P inellas P lanning C ouncil, a nd h as b een a pproved b y b oth g overnmental agencies, specifically as to Pinellas County by passage of a Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency has reviewed the Plan and recommends it to the City Commission; and WHEREAS, the Proposed Plan was reviewed by the Community Development Board, which is the land planning agency for the City of Clearwater for purposes of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, and the Community Development Board found the Proposed Plan to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 95-65 was adopted on August 8, 2002 which declared the area generally east of the Redevelopment District as containing slum and blighted conditions and detrimental to the sound growth of the area; and WHEREAS, the Proposed Plan conforms to the general plan of the City of Clearwat�r as a whole; and WHEREAS, the proposed Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the rehabilitation or redevelopment of the Plan area by private enterprise; and S:IPlanning DepartmentlDOWNTOWN PLAN UPDATEIOrdinance and Staff ReportslDowntown Plan Update Ordinance - Ord 7153-03.doc Ordinance No. 7153-03 WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Clearwater has examined the map of the boundaries of the Plan area, a copy of which is attached to this resolution within and part of Exhibit A, and believes upon careful consideration that the map is an accurate representation of the boundaries of the area; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds it necessary to adopt the map as the official map of the boundaries of the Plan area; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Downtown Clearwater Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby adopted. Section 2. The City Manager or designee shall forward said Plan to any agency required by law or rule to review or approve same. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, subject to the approval by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners and the Pinellas Planning Council. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk S:\Planning Department\DOWNTOWN PLAN UPDATE\Ordinance and Staff Reports\Downtown Plan Update Ordinance - Ord 7153-03.doc Ordinance No. 7153-03 2 No. LOCATION/ PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BOARD/AGENCY PAGE OF RECOMMENDING REVISION IN *Strikethroughs indicate deletions and underlines indicate additions REVISION PLAN CHAFTEIt 2 EXISTTI'�� 1�11�I'�i��TS 5 Page 15 — Insert See Exhibit "B" (cont'd), page 11, Insert Amendment 5- The Pinellas County/Pinellas new section Planning Area Planning Council before Land Use section 6 Page 17 — Map See Exhibit B(cont'd) - Revise Map 2 Downtown Plan Area. Pinellas Planning Council 2 Highlight Downtown boundary on map and add to legend. 7 Page 37 —Map 6 See Exhibit "B" (cont'd) — Revise Map 6 Existing Parking Pinellas Planning Council Facilities - insert corrected map. 8 Page 43 — Add Downtown-Gatewav Strategic Action Program City Commission new program to In 2002, the Citv's first Downtown-Gatewav Strategic Action Existing Program was developed throu h a partnership of the CR.A, Downtown Downtown Development Boaxd, Ma3n Street Joint Venture Redevelopment Committee and Regional Clearwater Chamber of Commerce. This Programs is a three-�_pro�ram that defines the work program for the Section City's Economic Development Department with re arg d to Downtown. The program identifies various rograms, projects, and costs and is reviewed and revised on a yearl�sis. Exhibit B— Amendments to Downtown Plan No. LOCATION/ PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BOARD/AGENCY PAGE OF RECOMMENDING REVISION IN *Strikethroughs indicate deletions and underlines indicate additions REVISION PLAN Chapter 3- Land Use Pla�ii�2�.development Plan 9 Page 49 — insert See Exhibit "B" (cont'd), page 13, Insert Amendment 9- Vision Pinellas Planning Council/ new section of Plan Planning Department entitled Vision of Plan before the Goals and Obj ectives 10 Page 50 — Goal Create an environment where both people and e-��vehicles can City Commission 2 circulate throughout Downtown safely and effectively. 11 Page 50 — Pursue a�-a� monorail connection from Downtown to Community Development Objective 2E Clearwater Beach and ensure a connection from Downtown to the Board and Pinellas Planning proposed countywide light rail system and the statewide high- Council speed rail system to improve traffic circulation and encoura�e economic development opportunities. 12 Page 51— Insert Monorail and li�ht rail stations shall be located in close proximitv Planning Departxnent new Objective to emplovment centers entertainment/retail centers and in areas of 2F (renumber existin� and planned concentrations of residential development. remaining The desi�n and scale of these stations shall be consistent with the objectives) vision and scale of the character district in which they are located. Exhibit B— Amendments to Downtown Plan No. LOCATION/ PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BOARD/AGENCY PAGE OF RECOMMENDING REVISION IN *Strikethroughs indicate deletions and underlines indicate additions REVISION PLAN 13 Page 51 — Encourage improvements to, and the expansion of, Pinellas City Commission Existing Suncoast Transit �4ge�e�} Authoritv (PSTA) services and routes to Objective 2F — include connections between Downtown and Clearwater Beach and (to be from Downtown to other regional attractions in Pinellas County. renumbered to 2G) 14 Page 51— Encourage the future development of a joint use public/private City Commission Objective 2I parking garage and bus terminal located at either ^� +'�° '�'^�L ..,�� the current PSTA tezminal-�es�es location on the west side of Garden Avenue from Park Street to Pierce Street or at another Downtown location determined bv the Citv and PSTA. 15 Page 52 — Projects located at or near City Commission Objective 9 e� the border of the Downtown Plan azea; shall use effective site and building design features to ensure an appropriate transition and buffer between the different areas. 16 Page 59 — 2n The Harborview/Coachman Park parcel is located west of Osceola City Commission and 3rd sentence Avenues from Drew Street south to Cleveland Street and is of 4`h paragraph currently developed with uses open to the public. The City will therefore onlv contemplate redevelopment containing uses open to the public such as retaillrestaurant/hoteUentertainment uses within the footprint of the existing Harborview Center. 17 Page 61 - For the long term, the existing footprint of the Harborview Center City Commission Policy 1— 2nd may be redevelopment solely with restaurant, retail convention sentence center and/or hotel uses so the site remains open to the ublic. 4 Exhibit B— Amendments to Downtown Plan Noe LOCATION/ PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BOARD/AGENCY PAGE OF RECOMMENDING REVISION IN *Strikethroughs indicate deletions and underlines indicate additions REVISION PLAN 18 Page 64 — Delete drive-through facilities as prohibited and add adult uses as Planning Department and Prohibited Uses prohibited Downtown Development Board 19 Page 64 — Height — West of Osceola Avenue City Commission Height —150'; Between Osceola and Ft. Harrison Avenues and between Jones and Drew Streets —150'; East of Osceola Avenue — 40' 20 Page 65 — T'�° °° r�� ° Existing commercial uses fronting on North City Commission Policy 5— ls` Fort Harrison Avenue may be expanded or redeveloped through sentence the block to North Osceola Avenue. 21 Page 68 — Add adult uses as prohibited Downtown Development Prohibited Uses Board 22 Page 69 — Use More intense commercial and office development may be Planning Department section — 4th permitted, however, along major streets such as Myrtle Avenue, sentence Cleveland Street, Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue and Court and Chestnut Street. 23 Page 70 — Add adult uses as prohibited Downtown Development Prohibited Uses Board 24 Page 70 — � 75' City Commission Height Exhibit B- Amendments to Downtown Plan No. LOCATION/ PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BOARD/AGENCY � PAGE OF RECOMMENDING REVISION IN *Strikethroughs indicate deletions and underlines indicate additions REVISION PLAN 25 Page 71— One dwelling unit may be permitted as accessory to *'�° rri„��„^' Pinellas Planning Council Policy 3 a sing,le-family or two-familv dwelling provided sufficient parking exists on site. The unit will not be considered when calculating density for the site. 26 Page 73 — Add adult uses as prohibited Downtown Development Prohibited Uses Board 27 Page 73 — �8'— 75' City Commission Height 28 Page 75 — Add adult uses as prohibited Downtown Development Prohibited Uses Board 29 Page 76 — The se�ie� rehabilitation of existing motels into residential Community Development Policy 5 apartments s�ie� shall be prohibited. Board 30 Page 83 - last In fact, ' Pinellas County sentence of lst this Plan antici ates a paragraph maximum build-out of 9,000 housing units and it is anticipated that an additional 600 — 1000 units could be supported in the Downtown Core in the near future. 31 Page 83 — ', City Commission Policy 10 Su�port non- profit a�encies _that assist the_ Hispanic population, especiallv in the East Gatewa�character district. Exhibit B— Amendments to Downtown Plan Noo LOCATION/ PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BOARD/AGENCY PAGE OF RECOMMENDING REVISION IN *Strikethroughs indicate deletions and underlines indicate additions REVISION PLAN 32 Page 84 — Continue to work with #�e Pinellas County and other coordinating City Commission Policy 13 organizations t o a ddress t he p roblem w ith t he i nebriate, a ddicted and ��e�e chronic homeless population. 33 Page 84 — Add Increase lobbving efforts to obtain more appropriations for housin� City Commission Policy 15 proQrams and to secure new sources of fundin�. 34 Pages 117 insert See Exhibit "B" (cont'd) - Add six Wayfinding Pages Planning Department Wayfinding pages to the Master Streetscape and Wa�nding Plan 35 Page 121— See Exhibit "B" (cont'd) — Insert revised Coachman Park Master City Commission Coachman Park Plan which includes additional parking spaces for Pickles Plus Master Plan 36 Page 124 — add See Exhibit "B" (cont'd), page 14 - Insert Amendment 36 — Pinellas County new paragraph paragraph regarding the transportation level of service in after first three Downtown. bullets Exhibit B— Amendments to Downtown Plan No. LOCATION/ PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BOARD/AGENCY PAGE OF RECOMMENDING REVISION IN *Strikethroughs indicate deletions and underlines indicate additions REVISION PLAN ChaPter'4 — P�an. Im�pl�m�nta,ti`on 37 _ Page 129 — ls This Plan will be implemented in �we four major ways: throu�h the Planning Department sentence of lst application of Plan objectives, policies and design guidelines to paragraph �ecific redevelopment projects during the site plan review process, the use of the Public Amenities Incentive Pool, public strategies and �r�gl� capital improvements to the Downtown. 38 Page 129 — 2n Compliance with Plan objectives, policies and design �uidelines Planning Department paragraph — add will ensure that �rivate development results in a development new first Uattern consistent with the vision for powntown. The Public sentence Amenities Incentive Pool provides a powerful tool to assist the private sector and the public attain the Plan vision. The public strategies are actions to be taken to implement the goals, objectives and policies of the Downtown Plan. 39 Page 129 — lst The t� fifth section of the Implementation Chapter lists the Planning Department sentence of 4th existing Redevelopment Incentives currently available to paragraph development. 40 Page 130 — See Exhibit "B" (cont'd), page 14 - Insert Amendment 40 - Planning Department Insert new Relationship of Downtown Plan to Community Development Code section before Downtown Strategies Exhibit B— Amendments to Downtown Plan No. LOCATION/ PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BOARD/AGENCY PAGE OF RECOMMENDING REVISION IN *Strikethroughs indicate deletions and underlines indicate additions �VISION PLAN 41 Page 130 — See Exhibit B(cont'd), page 15, Insert Amendment 41 — Public Pinellas Planning Insert a new Amenities Incentive Pool CounciUPlanning section after the Department above new section 42 Page 130 - See Exhibit "B" (cont'd), page 17, Insert Amendment 42 — Pinellas Planning CounciU revise Strategy 4 Planning Department Strategy 4 43 Page 131— Amend the Community Development Code regarding Transfer of Pinellas Planning Council Strategy 5 Development Rights to be consistent with this Plan, including the removal of the 20 percent limited transferred to a receiving site for �roperty located within the Central Business District Future Land Use Plan categor� 44 Page 132 — Add Continue to implement the Downtown-Gatewav Strate�ic Action City Commission a new Strategy program and update on a vearlv basis. 19 and renumber remaining strategies 45 Page 136 — Add Strateg�y: Downtown-Gateway Strategic Action Pro�ram City Commission new Strategy 19 Lead De�t.: Economic Development and renumber Timing: Ongoing Strate�y remaining strate ies Exhibit B- Amendments to Dovcmtown Plan No. LOCATION/ PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BOARD/AGENCY PAGE OF RECOMMENDING REVISION IN *Strikethroughs indicate deletions and underlines indicate additions REVISION PLAN 46 Page 163 — See Exhibit B(cont'd), page 18, Insert Amendment 46 — Tax Pinellas County revise Tax Increment Revenue Projections Increment Revenue Proj ections section ��c�� .. 47 Page 174 — See Exhibit B(cont'd), page 29, Insert Amendment 47 - Revise Planning Department Appendix 2 meeting dates in the "Actions and Public Review of this Downtown Redevelopment Plan" section. Milestones 48 Page 197 — Add data. source and preparation date to Appendix 6 as follows: Planning Department Appendix 6 Source: Ci� of Clearwater Planning and Economic Develo�ment Land Use Departments. Prepared b� Citv of Clearwater Plannin� Distribution by Departrnent, Januarv 2003 Character Districts 49 Page 204 — add See Exhibit B(cont'd), page 31, Insert Amendment 49 — City Commission Appendix 8 Appendix 8 Downtown-Gateway Strategic Action 50 Entire Renumber Plan pages as required by these amendments Planning Department Document 10 Exhibit B- Amendments to Downtown Plan EXHIBIT "B" (cont'd) PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN PLAN AMENDMENT 5, PAGE 15 OF PLAN THE PLANNING AREA The Downtown Clearwater Plan encompasses 539.7 acres comprised of 1,740 parcels of land (see Map 2, page 17). This document serves a dual function as both the S ecial Area Plan for the entire planning area and as the Redevelopment Plan for 83% (448.7 acres) of the land axea that is located within the Citv's Communitv Redevelopment Area. Those areas not contained within the CRA boundaries are considered part of the Downtown and are governed by this Plan. This Plan will replace previouslv adopted special area plans including�the 1995 Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan which governed the CRA, as well as the Downtown_ Clearwater Peripherv Plan, ori 'nally adopted in 1995 and amended in 2001. This Plan is intended to guide Downtown redevelopment for the next 20 years. Ori�inal and Exuanded Community Redeveloument Area The cit 'Y s original Cornmunitv Redevelopment Area (CRA), illustrated on Map l, �age 9 encompassed 247 acres. The bli ting factors identified for this area in 1981 include: • A predominance of defective or inadequate street lavout bv modern standards; • Faultv lot lavout limiting the nature and extent of uses of �r�erties; • Deterioration of sites, buildings, and other improvements: • Diversitv of ownership which prevents the free alienabilitv of economically feasibl, sized ro�erties; • Unusual conditions of title based on large institutional holdin�s in this area which restrict the market supplv and size of private enterprise land: and • A static tax base, with conditions of ownership which portend a continuing relative decline in the downtown area's values. Over the past 20 vears, the CR.A has had a positive impact on Downtown as evidenced by the public and private investment detailed in this Chapter in the section titled "Investment in Downtown." Certain issues identified above, however, still exist. Additionallv, Downtown lacks activity. It has numerous nonconforming uses as a result of the ado�tion of the 1999 Community Development Code, as w ell as Brownfields, deteriorating and unattractive infrastructure and lack of housing diversity. These issues combined with the recent slowdown in the economy, the construction of several major capital projects and other chan�in.g conditions presented an opportunity to redefine the vision and boundaries for the CR.A. The most important c�ital project impacting Downtown is the re-ali�nment of the new Memorial Causewav Bridge, which is scheduled to open in early 2004. This pro�ect, which is discussed in detail later in this Chapter will have a tremendous impact on Downtown because it will si�nificantiv change commuting patterns from the mainland to 11 Exhibit B (cont'd) � I • _^� � MF T� 'tfp�'\ c W AGS��y �V \ �t7B` ` V � � 3 z c N W E S 0 400 800 Feet L�-- � METTO ST 3 a N = rQ CEDAR ST � � ~ PALMETTO ST � {•' PALMETTO ST PALMETTO ST �' A�RGO AVE a ._ � � i / , w NICHOLSON ST NICHOLSON ST � u.// � /�.�� w w ✓ / � / 2 � Q Q J Csrf 1'�(t• c c� �� Y Oi t h W 2 S t, / j � W Z SEMINOLE ST W SEMINOLE ST W � SEMINOLE ST F ipFiery/P�;lan z Q -> Q W Q W m � � J a � � LL W F 2 Q � LL � 1 E < ¢ � ELDRIDGE ST > � ELDRIDGE ST � � O z � } � m ELDRIDGE ST O o Z z � Y a MAPLE ST w W MAPLE ST MAPLE ST a LEE ST F J PLAZA ST ? � W G R A � � � ¢ � � > � O JACKSON RD � y Z � � AR ST j HART ST � HART ST � � � p � N LL V O � �� j Q 2 > � ' j W Z � Z a a a z a Y 0 W Z JONES ST � �' �. 3 y w � � a � z a m W � � z � � _ � w a � DREW ST •• � � •�� Noctheast � � W Pe'iiphery'Pla.n N Q I'aROVE ST > GROVE ST O � HENDRICKS ST Q = W ' W U O LAURA ST � � LAURA ST a a m LAURA ST 3 a a w c F � o � c a CLEYELAND ST W Existing CRA � � CLEVELAND ST Q Z PARK ST � pARK ST PARK ST Q � W (�/l � W �---� a% > � >) � g � �� '� " PIERCE ST O F PIERCE ST PIERCE ST a Y w � LL p To1vn ( ��++ O � a Lake ! W FRANKLlN ST ` � > W Q � COURT ST o � W — J / � COURT ST ' ~ -� - � v� QP W PALMETTO ST Q w � FOREST RD 0 � j � PINEWOOD ST U= 9CARANDACIR � j OAKWOOD ST x w Q CRESNIEW ST a ° z 3 � = R�SEWOppST w a c� – � x DREW ST � '� �� W z ° w w � �f' BROWNS�CT Z � � J Q o Q � GROVE ST GROVE ST � O Z z a �' Z m GROVE ST � W a � GRQYE ST Y o a W i W O � LAURA ST j LAURA ST m y � � W a � O � CLEVELAND ST W o Z CLEVELAND: > a � N � Q � PARK Sa PARK ST � W � Q � � � g Z Z m yG LLPIERCE ST w G' PIERCE ST � �� G�� '� w TO V D W j @91 FRANKLIN S o a FRANKLIN ST e!L G�� Q N � F�NK�`�a Q FRANKLIN ST U DE LEON L T � DE LEON ST S � : r - �- Southeast MARKLEY ST � /P e � i h e r' P I a n SANTA ROSA S7 � , P .Y SAN JUAN CT w Q Q 0 T S CHESTNUT ST RSSTm R ' � • _ __ D 3 a TURNER ST m ' PINE STW Q t ON Y � O � RD _ > o'uthwes i p'h';e`r:y�P W < W � � � > a a � z Y � PINE ST W x � J Z K a f �Downtown Plan Existing CRA Area � �247.5 AC) (539.7 AC) Source: City of Clearwater Planning Depa ¢ � O � z u > Q c O w c� 0 w w ¢ Y g w a Y 5 GULF TO BAY BLVD Legend Expanded CRA (Includes portions of Periphery � Periphery Plan Areas ST Plan Area) (120.5 AC) (201.2 AC) snt Prepared by: City of Clea►water Planning Department, January 2003 Revised Exhibit "B" • This is not a map of Survey- G:1GIS\TBEUnxd�cra_periph.mxd • u - O � �F � MpR�qt c � ��S��4 Y � \ `II C \ V N W E S 0 400 800 Feet rQ CEDAR ST ~ PALMETTO ST O • 4 �GO AVE � W NICHOLSON ST J � ; Q Q � w a --+ > O SEMINOIE ST � ,L�, W w SEMINOLE ST W Y � z � � �� w � ' z ¢ 0 ELDRIDGE ST a ¢ y ELDRIDGE ST J � $ w � �' t� O Z Z � y a MAPLE ST W � `T' Q a w �_ O �� LEE ST F -1 J . .---- � PLAZA ST ? GEORGIA 5T � \ Q I � � .i \ .- HART ST HART ST j HART ST w a > a Q z Q JONES ST p � JQNES S'C . � i JONES ST � ,a � : a � i : � �y �Q''_ . _. ,_ I I ' � 2 �� . '�: i � �'.. �1. i. , W W � DREW ST ! .. LQ� .O �. ��. . c�l '� �: __. .._ ._ . _y � , .� ' : _�� _ � , ��11E5T �_�w �q �� _, � HENDRICKSST � �+ � � r PA�METTO ST PALMETTO ST NICHOLSON ST SEMINOLE ST W a z � ELDRIDGE ST y N i MAPLE ST a ¢ OJACKSON RD � � O = w ai Q Q f 3 O N °a � GROVE ST � � � .LAURA ST - W . . _ j � . � U ��. O 1 _��„�-. Q LAUIj�1 ST � � ' m LAURA�,ST � o. � a • _ w � 0 GROVE ST W a p SEMINOLE ST � w LL LL w ' ELDRIDGE ST MAPLE ST z J � m w a j w o = 'a � J F W V O LL Z U W J y ' � J a � w m � ��'. - .. . . !` i I ,, � � . '�*. . '�IiII .iii� : '- . . Q .. , � , . . ��, '.� � � E-- T +�� ___ �Ey�� Q CLEVELAND ST CLEVELAND — V ' � � - i � . ii 1 i IwQ' fl �AI2K�� 7 i'� ' 1�� J��ARK $T> � �,> ___ R�i \ � ;� � y. � � �,I��,— � � ��.,y '�'°"s " .K z �S I ._ ,; � - .. ;J � Q Q; � Q �;: ...Z Q' � i ES z O PIERCE ST ` 7� 0 = PIERCE ST �T PIERCE ST W r–�- i Y �' � m _' � O � I O' T°titi�n . . _i� _, . _.. �� I� � .. , . Ri � I , a� L_ake � � FRANlCLIN ST � o- , � _ W _- 7 �J�-_ ., .. . _.. -. �` ' � Q�- � ' W .. ? COLBT ST { wi ;� ' L � W _ ,o�,. ' . � � � _ Q COURT ST ~ � _ r: � � � -' W MARKLEY S� � ._ � w Q !�1� — T ST � . � CHESTNUT S7 OGERS S7m OGERS ST D > 3 a D �. � TURNER ST m - . TIIRNER ST • Z 0 :H ST pINE STW Q �( ON Y '� o �d tUID RD w > Q This is not a mao of Survev. G:\GIS\TBE\mxd\cra extents.mxd HAROLD CT PINE ST > a � C > � N � a PINE ST w Q a; 1- Z �-, U O O� , p N u� z � f FRANK� � ¢ GOULD ST � i � SANTA ROSA ST BROWNELL ST ; ��- COURT ST 'a � TURNER ST � � Z Y � _ � � J Z � f DRUID RD �Downtown Plan Area ' (539.7 AC) a o � a � � 0 w r � g r v g v� QP W PALMETTO ST a W o ° > - <. MAPLE ST . � � MAPLE ST � ¢ O � � > JACA�NDA CIR = 3 a W F FOREST RD � � PINEWOOD ST � = y9CARANDACIR U � � OAKWOOD ST s w Q CRESNIEW ST a � a = y � g �osew000 Sr 3 Q � w � _ DREW ST �a �� GROVE ST z z c� _ w ST > W a 0 � W � CLEVELAND � � � PARK � � PARK ST Q Z , �i w Legend Existing CRA � Expanded CRA (247.5 AC) (201.2 AC) � GROVE ST p m w -1 a LAURA ST m w Q � O z � Periphery Plan Areas (Not Included in ! Expanded CRA) (91.1 AC) W ¢ O O 0 w c� 0 W BLVD Source: City of Clearwater Planning Department I Prepared by: City of Clearwater Planning Department, April 2003 i DRUID RD DRUID RD z !'7_'_!__J r'__V7V71 ��!"�1� r�cv�acu `w��u�� u • � 7-J•a ':; IT� i' 7li ;.:��:-: a � i i _ _�+ y '_-': p;:::_ _�_- ti � � • �, � , � �� `� � .`�1 Metal Cutout Lamp Graphlcs � � �.��. __. `.�. �y : �� Garden ��. .' � Street � ;— Library j�� Parking � �� ,:�. Garage _ '1 �• � City,Hall v � � Courthouse _ �.� �._. �� CITY OF CLEARWATER SIGNS & GRAPHICS • Beu.o�io � f Irat�:xi S1IAUGHN666Y HART . ._ +.,ri', - .. � � � GD � � �3 � � �.• C UCi b .o. � 0 • � � Planter Marquee � i ' a�`� � - - -. � sae, s�i s�i�a�, .�ri� .��':'.`s�� CITY OF CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN GRAPHICS • 1- j �` . `� . ,. � • .�,^ � � � ��YV� . � I' - �� - � � � . �CJ/�nV�' i . �' �� • i•• � �� , � • Ei1:I.I 11h1U � � �ERNIJ:I' SPAUGH!1666Y iiART � ', .,.'It. �..'.. � � ... � �. � W � � p a B' �a b � p • • • l � �� ._. ,� _ � �, / �� n w� l � ``. V � ` . Metal Cut-out Lamp Graphics 400 P��J� ST. �� Planter Marquee �� ',��' � �� .cv�V. _ , � :1 i � .�r, II� �-. a� --_��, S 4 :\ I'•�� • { 7 ��.�. ��__ � I 1_ , Garden � • Street " � Parking � �� Garage � �� Information Signs ,`�� '�► ''_t i, � � .-� (0�(�Im�N r ' ,. p�', � �, ► P��! �[�i: �,�� .,: �� r�• #� � -� _ ^ --- I x Directionai Signs � _T _ ;'.,. : : �k�::� s�;._ �� ; : � �� . , , . ,��'�b�� + � ' �� I � ' CITY OF CLEARWATER � I I Lam Gra hics • Directional Si ns • Planter Mar uee p P 9 q ti�:..,�� e��:�_�� :��, �, ° w:.�,��.. :.r. � � � Cd � � � d �o � � • � CITY OF CLEARWATER '-��,� ,rf��. DOWNTOWN CORRIDOR CLEVELAND STREET OVERHEAD DIRECTIONAL SIGNS ' � CO Be � City Hall ..N �.� � � � �. � � bd I � � � � � ... � � ''d � � � � kq '� � � Exl�ibi� � — �ayf�ncling Plan � ��'!r ,+�' _. ___ ;. . : 's-_� .+.. ..._ __ .__ .i =. # � y� _ _ i � � i i . �, p �' , a�!' .. , ; �-- y,.^^ � . ��; . . _ ,�__*---- - :.e-r7R:k�L-t�- �� : -- _ .. _ . --- --- --- � ' ' -- � i r�r.� :... _ �;y,�.�. • , - , - �. �- . * ; s . � n . . � � � I }l. ,a : 1 - �-,� �, - -� � � �..iJ ... O�a.��„F:`�i',°..T-, T� - i_P4 .�.t�1� ti �.4,'; 9C BP�i � T �I�-:-:..E?:J! ,, . , ._..._ . . ;��-_�. _ p t � a a, u- �. �� e� �,_a� t- ; 1 1 �tc, H � °: _�. � '. � ' �_ - i '��-. t='+� . . - n.-...I � _ . I..____.:.. i�4 — - ,. . ., i:�..�.� ,....::�:�-�.:-i�. 0'�' , . . �__.. _.. .. . ___ . . . .__.-.F ,.�.:T.��t,'i.y� °' �, �. , J�v -�r _ s.� — • � . _— . _# 1'--• : � �- — - � , G . ' . �� } r - :.ye�P - ' d 1 ` X �� - . b i � `,� , : s . �+. � � � ��.�a. H ks�:!. '�':��! ' ' _ .,�".. , _ ..��3 = 4 _ g� � � € _ ..__� •,.,.. ._.._. t ..�.--^.��.�.�, . _;�::•'. �� . .,��3 e .�..-.=i ' �' .a9-_ - .. . _ � �; _ 1 u. x _ � . ' # � �� ` - `,y II - � �t � � �. =�r'i • � ��n■ - .::,..,; ��. � ,, __.. --- _ .. __x � \J � � � � W • � ` ��r , "' '�'n��"?!`�':�'.�'J�1��, ,a,,� " �� _...», �"" � ��'�'",�_.. _- �, ��,,,,� t � � ; � . .,� � , � �' _ � �� w� �a, �� ?, ,� ` ,,. � �,} , - d� I i,� ,��r „�'�r�r __-- ,",� r , . , � � � �,��, ,� . � �. �" . � ^��`' i j�° ' �„ �' � k � I �� ' �.._ i� ` �`�� I ,api ,� ,'a I�- � '� ,�pn ,w� �. ; �lYU .. �ml �l i � � ��'M�ydk'y4"�," `.'^� ` �i t4' ' � � '��1"� #'1'73x"1: "�Mi L� � ti �; ��pY � `>b# 7� St°�,. ,�, .. � ��r "" ,�� "'+��'� n �, �' � ��;rt^�� a.� �� fa : y�,�' � � � " ' � n �'` .. � � � �,�v� : ,� � �ti � , r :� !1:1 n . G5'� :;l:i k" t, 4 �� --- F :#C � ;� s dy', k''� �� + WI I . . �.. � I� '�" ,� � ;�� , � :� � ,r� �� ;:b i ;; 4�^ �'�' �'�' � � I� � y�' I1�� Y , ^� fiu �.. I � �-- ✓ ( , � � . f'� .� . � ' �`� �:�� I� �,�, j P i - + I i i I��,,�'�N �� ,'� a CS�u��.�rti�p 4,,$ati.�..�i1±.aaµ�"#�'l�� '�=. �\�'� � i 1 . t�,,4 � �i�i.,�+u�^'v�.�:!k��'TY'-�?iirA'�"-�Y�'r4p,�� n��,r .. tiV, ! i� �^�i, ^ �''�"_ i ��'� �! ` ��J�� I,,.. � � I�� e i y� � r,, r, C.� ^"�A , y ��j � � � �e � I j u l k:��--- I i �i � � � . .—_— '�'. �� ; � � '�� "*�r 'Ra� � `�'�j i 1q. . ,� �, , � . 2 J � �i i . � �_ �_ �� v : ' , ,�� . � f' �. ,� �' , �� ----- ___ � �( .;' � , � ��- I "� <y '��:q '� �� .:� ,. �t'�► I . � � � '� �� . , . ,, � � r �, � ._. ' . �. ...�... . � � x . _ .....� 'ta . . �,� ��,�,. 4 .. _ C �. , ',, � _.. . � _ � .. __ � y . �. . �„ , .�y„ ,p�, „ ;s �� , . ,. :, .1 . .._ �, i �}�} , , 3 ' . i ' � ., . . . . . ... . � � �� ' ..., :9 L.... !� - - .-. � ; � —_ , ;.,� !� �6 c�.-.`�� = �R . ,�a �� _ ,- , . �, , n u r . '�.... °�-'— 'r�� _ i- �� I �� . • W � � W�l ^ f"'� ✓' t"' J ��: � ` �\.i � � � � �� 1� � � � � y�� _;; -I - � � � � � � � �.d' � � �==� � "��,In��,> � �', ,. • O � � � y., �� C,q� S �y,q,- > : c7, w - a - z. _ .. - > , , ,,... , a � �� - ' - , JONES �T.Z _ _ ut. � _ - Map G 'y - p. - �_ JONES ST . - - �j_ cn Q � � ;Z Existing Parking Facilities �� Q I 1'i - — - - - � � ;� �.- DREW SI .. . W ST � � . � � .. , i �_ i _h - _ ,- , � ,, , � . a I. �o � I �-- �i' :� I - �� . , ` �� - ' , ; � � , W �,,, . _ , - � � w � -• v � � -,- , � . _ ,_._. . , ,I_ I' I ' � - O , I , � � "'- _ _._. ,,, II Q �' �ROVE ST' ,'- - w: -_- , : GROVE�ST ��II z ' : ; -- a , ; �P � �� i --- - ' y - HEND : KS ST - -- -!t --- � G�`�� d - -- � — _ LAURA ST ��lj� ` :� •: URA ST _ - � - �- --- 7tt --- - O. —RA ST .. ._- .- , . .. a .. _ �._ LAll � � �r c a i Q , O ', '_ � , . , _ _,_. � � � � W � ,.,..W...y, ..., '.......� �„��.. .......{ ...L.� .� a _ d ._ _'_ _ _ _ ' _.. '_ - - -- .. ' C � V ,� 'a N ,�,�E OGI S W 0 250 500 Q � i reet i p,j � I � ', Z TM.s�a.�rva�s�vw. c:r,�s�ree�.mmy.nanc.�ma � � -,._ *• - ....� . �.. . . ..-. . �.r. rt _ � - � - - . S --W --, - .. � ��- D T , __ i I I , , � ;. ' , W , ___ I� � _ _ � � -� ; -� ' ' '� - : � , � a_ : . , , I, >; �, I � ulI i� ; i - , z i , � _,_ ' , _ 1 _ � ''__ �a PARK ST " I I ---�AR1� ST =----�. �� PARKST>._. � , I ..:�. �... - � . _ - - O 'l� T ��, � - -, � 'a __ . -- . .::•.. . - �.,-.::•..::•.;: : � � .......,. ,, \ ' z ul v� ;:_:•;:::::: W .' '� 0-' I I .•.`.::::;:.:,::, :�ti��' (n ; 9� ti -. � � ',� , _ ; ' Q � .._::.•.�.:.. �� ' iQ �,_.. , �. � i ' : PIERCE ST � a P � ,� _ ., ' �- a - �"` - - -- _ � O � T- .._ _ � PIERCE ST i� � - � - � w � `R' d, a ; �W_ �__ � C) --, Q TOYb l2 , � - ' � tq � ' _ _ — . .•.• • u. � �C �2 • FRIANKL ..., . ... . . � ':: . . = . _ _ � CX G' ---_ � � .. ..., , ; _ , F= . , ' „ � _ a. , ' , ; � `� W' - - , - , 'J _ _ _. _ , :. .. •...•..::; IN •••••:.::•.• - _ - - .:. . ... : -- . . ..... .::: , �� • ..:... =� .. ... .. . ...:.......�.. >' � -- - .:...........• Q � ( W ; ' �W �. r a_ '•::::.::;::.: I ' � - - ,' ' . , ' ' _ _. _ � Q_, COURTST - Cj o W - . _ _ __ � � __. �.._i � � -- i � _ ''�- _ . - ,2 _- i j-r 6 [� a couRT sT � � ' � �_ _ .' ' ' ....:... - � _.- ,� --- - � ,� _ , � � , ; - - � - .. - ,- , � LEY ST i � � - ..: .• _ �w • ARF� , -,� - - _ � � j � � - - . ,. ___ _. � , � , � -- - - - - ` . > �Y _ _ ; : � Legend L a Q CHESTN.UT ST - � _ _ - ' Y O ' i ; ' : ; � � Private Garage _ ST m � '� � �� I Private Lot On-Street Parking Meters i � , W ROGERS ST - ;� - • • • • • • 2-Hour Parking (No Meters) � a , : - ;- _. : ' -- . - � Public Gara9e �i 3 a, � Untimed Parking � iURN�R ST �_ _ � PUbIIC LOt Source: City of Cleanvater Engineering Department _._.�i h-- fihr nf ^laar✓�re:�r 1' at` ^ DCC�R.^,:�.^.r p - �URNER ST ;. . . _ . - -- - a: , �- Exhibit B �?nng ' SI_ • � • CEDAR ST METTO ST 3 � � _ 2 O= PALMETTO ST PALMETTO ST PALMETTO S7 / / 4 j% �GO AVE � / � NICHOLSON ST � ;' � j �� W NICHOLSON ST �? / / / R �/ / r` w w Z ��,�,,, ,� � � � J / N O r�t�Yl`w e S t?/,' /+�u W w SEMINOLE ST W SEMINOLE ST W 0 SEMINOLE ST � � Pe�'ripher,y� P'lari � c�i > � a y ,�: , z iQ Q ; � W m � � W.� � � W J 2 Q � !� F- D DG ST �• a } ELDRIDGE ST > � ELDRIDGE ST y � � Z � y m EL�RIDGE ST o Z z � �' < MAPLE ST Z Y O a W MAPLE ST MAPLE ST LEE ST F � J PLAZA ST = w E Gt ST � j � a w W a a z Q > O JpCKSON RD � y Z a H T HART ST HART ST � p W O �- a z � LL � c�i a / 'a a a a � ' � w � K � W Z JONES 5T � 3 y a � Q � � Z , z f m Q = W W i- DREW ST l g � ...L�_ North.e`as't . W \ O � i r i > > r� QP PALMETTO ST F FOREST RD 0 � PINEWOOD ST � _ ✓9CARANDACIR Q U Q � � OAKWOOD ST � ¢ CRESNIEW ST < Z t�7 3 � _ ��gEWOpp Sr w W � _ � DREW ST O w LL W ; Per.iphery Plan a� W = o z � p Z S9ROVE ST W > GROVE ST a0�'� BROWNS CT 4 O O = Q p Q O n � O > Q �� W Z a � � GROVE ST GROVE ST p � y HENDRICKS ST ; Q = � O ? z V � W m � ,v � w � U O GROVE ST a a J Y � � � 1 F O� � W a a w GROVE ST � df w LAURA ST w �qUR71 ST > W � LAURA ST _� y � D �P� o Q Q Q m �.��"" ❑ W LAURA ST j LAURA ST m � c 3 . W `� N � a � a AGSF o t�o � a � J W o f n` q�' CLEVELAND ST a � � CLEVELAND ST CLEVELAND ST �� w � � CLEVELAND �, W Existing CRA � a ° � � o PARK ST � PARK ST pARK STQ � J � Q � PARK �j PARK ST � K w O Q � a � a' �, ' � 9 LL J W c � Z Z m � PIERCE ST �w G PIERCE ST (j � PIERCE ST o = PIERCE ST PIERCE ST w- ) Y � p � !,� r . W � y � �.� � � \.! y o ; p', Toirrt ; w ; w O r i > � � ' o�.l Lul� ` ,' � D W � '9{. FRANKLIN S y ; FR�INKLIN ST _ i / �/,. `� Z � � FRANKLIN ST eCLO a j �. �' '= F12ANKLIN ST w COURT ST w W � f%� fj ' �� NKV�� Q v DE LEON o • � %� / � /� . ' C;OU}.0 S� / � DE LEON ST dj Q COURT ST • � i' ;' i� % � � '� % ;f 2 c� r � ,; ;Soutlieast' % % W MARKLEY ST � � P"e r i�p hr2,� y; P I a�ll %�, SANTA ROSA ST SAN JUAN CT i w Q ' � � � BR�OVYNEl.L�SL� Q � T S CHESTNUT ST / GERS ST W R S' 'o a N a' 3 a � � W E Z TURNER ST m R T a � o S o u t h w e s t� a Z Downtown Plan $ P e r i p ti:e�r:yb P�I a n Y EXIStltlg C' W Area � �247.5 AC 0 400 800 CH ST p�NE S� / � gT W PINE ST � (539.7 AC) a � oN cRe � � Feet o '' W � Z � � � RUID RD = Source: City of Clearwater Planning D j s � DRUI[ � is not a map of Survey G\GIS\TBE4nxdlcra�eriph.mxd w a 0 0 3 Z W � GULF TO BAY BLVD I Legend Expanded CRA (Includes portions of Periphery Periphery Plan Areas ERST Plan Area) � (120.5 AC) (201.2 AC) ;nt Prepared by: City of Clearwater Planning Department, January 2003 Exhibit B • • u _^� � �F \ ��R �<� Q� AGS�k4y �v � n�' �\ V N W E S 0 400 800 Feet rQ CEDAR ST ~ PALMETTO ST O . 4 �GO AVE �W >w �C Q z � SEMINOIE ST'� � o W ELDRIDGE ST a 0 O 0 � Y Q O GEORGIA ST - _ HART ST -- w w a J > � Q � Z � w 0 4 NICHOLSON ST W > W SEMINOLE ST W z � a w g > Z a ELDRIDGE ST J � � > � y Z MAPLE ST W Y a � w LEE ST F � PLAZA ST ? � � HART ST j HART ST Q w Q w a Q 2 a Z W , .� , a _ _ � � Q I.I w z JONES ST � , oaFSSr�� c ��ESSx, -- � — � Q � f/1 _ ' _', (Q� � .. ,' � Z I � { I I+ �.. ��.�� 1,L '.! � i W W � F- DRE1Pl ST • • . . - • PALMETTO ST SEMINOLE ST W 'a R' � ELDRIDGE ST � N y g MAPLE ST NiCHOLSON ST � a � SEMINOLE ST � � w � LL w � ELDRIDGE ST MAPLE ST PALMETTO ST _ W m w Q W a ¢ z a > � JACKSON RD O � � o O ? W N LL Z V a, 'a � � � W � � � 3 p a N m G � - - ' - - - - !,-- � , � �, � i,IT .I ., I(. ; Q Q ' � L _ � I _I � 1( � I ,�� w Z ° > — � � i 120 E�7 w_ , GROVE ST �O�' BROWNS CT ¢ O O z Q p _ 1� . {' � �.� �, !++ ' F� I �i' z �� -, � I � � �` _ - � = - HERD CKS,I¢S --1 ' _ � � �� I ��(�� Q � � m �' ¢ �I I i I \ \�`__ _ �� _I._ - I � ! _j�. � _ _ ` GROVE ST � W GROVE ST Y � r �- , -'. �. a I ,__ .�A �.'..ST _ � ; __ - � , .LAU�2A� . - j , � � f -URq$T ST LL �A Y � ( � ;I , �:! � �, ' I � � _-- -� I i � I ; i � !� ua I � - ' ! - ; "' _ � . __'� . '�_!. .__� ' , � --� � �� _ __� � �.- --J � : ; � I'I � ' ��I � _ _'_- , [ 1 T_�, �_J l _ � � 1 � i .� i � _ _ _ l i � � i� '_ �___l I . ': ' i� _ � _' � � �, � � � ._ __1 � �,_ ---- ,-CLF�1lE .. .._ '- . , _CLEVEL,AN 3T _ CLEVELAND ST v� QP W PALMEfTO ST a w � O � � —_ _._. _�` C---�. Map 2 Downtown Plan Area MAPLE ST W �ACp,RpNDA CIR a � a � FOREST RD � � = y9CARANDACIR U J ; = W a CRESNIEW ST Q � Z V1 � J W � _ _ -� s_`-� E � � W � = � ¢ z - � w w � � � W W � W - I I I �'� Ll ll" �_I �i� ..i_r i�,-1�I�, �� . I i i �1 it - �' t]Ci�Jti�I� � ' � �, ., __. _. _...._-I- iJ.� (_ �_. i I _�-_.� a��. Q _ ---a .s — 'L VtWND� .. r- ' I � � �y�,I I � � �� ][7.. i i I _ �--"---.. .. _ l 1 _ G � . � _ __. _, li � , � Q _.. � � . ��{ . _.. � i - V'� I L .i_ �....., �1:� I `� r , � I c-�� I �� _ .I . � ( — -.. ; } � ; - � '._�- - ► 4 . � ---. --- �:: . . . _. .. _._... � � . � � �-- -� >.�... Ll �1 I F � ��'_ ,_ � �r;I1CTlrC i , -- w�_ 1 � v a T i�pA K S`f c. P/�Rlt ST 37� I I �> PARK ST � PA _ - �N l r T �, ;. � _ i � i.,• ��\' �:? Id L� I' I a.: o r RK�i - � C __�� ! � i � �� i � , � � � � � � � - � I , I � � I I�' 1 � �' I 1��= � z =; _- z , ` \ �. 2l�RCE.ST , Q - �_ 1_ 1 i _ . �_ I- - -� �-- � I - �� ' � �.._ � ' � ,U � 3� _ � � IK ' � , ` I _ I _. � I.` _ L ` ' 1 ' PlERCE ST m: 9� LLPIERCE ST � �,G __ _ i g.:... I E R E S T -� -.i --T P R C E T _ A Y. .., � I I � T=- ?� � t- ,_ C7 C,p `_ _ _ � I l� I �-_. �•�, � I � I-�_I I� �� j W 1,p - -_ i m � � - � i � � , 7 �� Lake �� c�i ,� � � ° � w w '` ��9�, L i i I I "� —_ I � rlll � i , �� ;� ,. . s > .�. � , p . S,T (-_ at J ' � ¢ , '� � ¢ F� �C � � � �_ l . i�►N�� ( ' _ --- i ii m v�i . G`� °z � � �� _N � � �4� i � � �_ 1 I � a . _ � � � � ='i � ' � � Q - � Q �� FRAWKLIN S7 ��_ - � _ ' , I .� � � ��-_ i , � ° �* > -_�°_ - - - - l � Z 1 I : i I - �� - -- � � � i FRANK�? Q �, V � � DE LEON _ CUIlRT-S7 ., w�- � I ol1.I- � 1 - - � -, i � . 1.. _ � x GOULD ST ,��SI' - � - Q COURT ST : K \.. � e.- �_ . . - [--- _� C7 � � �t 1i \ . T ` � � � �" � �� ,� - - �_ �-� �� _ _;__ �� _ � SANTA ROSA ST SAN JUAN CT ,� � �� - - � , !l. � 1ll ll �_ � [ _' T �T I R06ER5 STm o r OGER3 ST I�� l� �� I I � TURNER ST � TURNER ST �� ST p�NE STW Q � ON Y '� o � D RD Tlifs is nul a mao of Survev. G\GIS\TBE1mxd\cra extents.mxd HAROLD CT PINE ST W Q W � r � I � � � - BROWNELL ST i _ iT �1 r . COURT ST I _ � 1 I�I I �- PINE ST > a � TURNER ST � Z Y � w F=- � ..1 z x � DRUID RD j`�, Downtown ,( —� Plan Area '�� (539.7 AC) j MAPLE ST � a O O O 3 3 2 W � PINEWOOD ST OAKWOOD ST �oSEw000 sr DREW ST GROYE ST � m � s LAURA ST m W 'a G O � 2 J � COURT ST Gl1LF' Legend Periphery Plan Areas j � Existing CRA �; Expanded CRA (Not Included in � -�(247.5 AC) �(201.2 AC) ! Expanded CRA) (91.1 AC) Source: City of Clearwater Planning Department Prepared by: City of Clearwater Planning Department, April 2003 DRUID RD DRUID RD Exhibii B � a G O O w C� 0 w BLV[ ; I �� I, i I n.. ' �. I I�I'ul�� .il. e lii � , i � 1 N�'., b y � � � ��:", � � � p�,� '{ a � � �� r �� , ' � �; bao � '�� r�.w � � M �°��. r� ,��i1 I' �I � �.. � q��i� n i i ��i i �i i� �� ir '�iYiii4Y� i �: � „��I;,.n � �m � ii �� '� il li. i��+��id�jll N' u �6iGi�j � � h � ��IIN�n "��,,�j� � ti, r I ' "� ��';� �i � � S�1 � � ��I�II�'lll�l�, �I��Illhll I I ' �� I i��' � � �`� 'IN��'; •. '` �1 ' � ^i'_'''_�^C—^,a ��'��. � I� il� ��u I u ,; w. ; �I ili,: , illk�hll�lq lill d�,, �� i �� i��i i � 'iil@ i ��I�hl�fll�lu�i: , ; ^ ��uy �,�W��n� ,,�� '--. _ __ . _._ _._ , .... - o � � ��. � : , �'q �, , i qlllUlul i II ilip i �. i ini � ��P . , � .. i u i il� i I �"�� I�hN I . n 1 �Ip�ry�,�ipiy� � � I m��,, � � hill�lll � � �f � III I i • ��VI�� . � J � �Illl�lmlll�iip�ip � ,�.,, ,�rp, �pu��I'', I �, � � � i j� I i ' �I�I�yiNi I��ItlwesW... jh: °°�.��. . ....... .,, .. �..«��„w,,,1��y , � �!�' �. Ik�..:..�� ;,,, ��Tl �I' I I�� ._I' � � Y m yn �� .. � p-'�I� +':. ul .. � I " .�u!� ' 4 ��h� �� T � .. . I I i .. ai .....,,.. � i � � -- -- _' • � • COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY � �� Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 1 of 1 � Ciry Commission Item ID: 304 Preferred Date: � 2-� $-2003 �''' Latest Possible Date: 12-1$-2003 ]''`. __.._.....__ ....... ........................_.......�� +. -Subiect / Recommendation: Submitted: 11�14-2003 Actual Date: __._..�.__� APPROVE amendments to the Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan and PASS Ordinance No. 7231-03 on first reading. -Summary: - For the summary section of the City Commission Cover Memo, please refer to the attachE.d word dacument titled, "Memo for the Summary Section of the City Commission Downtown Plan Amendments Cover Memo." - For the summary section of the Community Redevelopment Agency Cover Memo, please refer to the attached word cYocument titled, "Memo for the Summary Section of the Community Redevelopment Agency Downtown Plan Amendments Cover Memo." Originating Department: Section: Administrative public hearings Category: Code Amendments All Number of Hard Copies attached: 9�_�__..____� Yes —` � Public Hearing: Advertised Dates: ,11_-01�-2003 ; ' __�______..___ �......__� �._...__-__-� ^---'---- �__-----�-�^� —� - � ��--�-- --- -„ [ "MEMO FOR THE SUMMARY SECTION OF THE CRA DOWNTOWN PLAN AMENDMENTS COVER MEMO" LL �� Y � �� 4 F- S,p# U MEMORANDUM To: Bill Horne, City Manager From: Cyndi H. Tarapani, AICP, Planning Director Date: November 7, 2003 RE: Amendments to the Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMEND APPROVAL of amendments to the Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan and PASS Ordinance No. 7231-03 on frst reading �U IU_: ' This is a Community Redevelopment Agency item. The City Commission approved the Cleanvater Downtown Redevelopment Plan on September 18, 2403. The draft Plan was initially submitted to Pinellas County staff for review in June 2003 and multiple meetings were held between City and County planning staff to discuss the proposed Plan. As a result of these discussions, the City agreed to incorporate certain clarifications and additions requested by County staff into the Plan on first reading. After the City adopted the Plan, the County staff requested additional information regarding how tax increment revenues will be used to implement the Plan. T'he County staff asked for an account of tlxe amount of tax increment financing (TIF) funds to be used for each project as compared to other eligib�e sources of funding. The City prepared an estimate of this information and provided it to the County in early October. On October 21, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) discussed the Plan under the County Administrator's Reports. The Board indicated its general support for the Plan as the Redevelopment Plan and Special Area Plan for powntown but had concerns with the Plan's use of TIF. In particular, the Board appeared to concur with the County Administrator's concerns about the length of the term of th�e Tax Increment District as well as objecting to certain intended uses of TIF funds. The Gounty Administrator's report indicated that the Board should delay a decision on the Plan until the City made amendments to the Plan to address the County's concerns regarding the use of TIF fund. Senior City and County staffs have held several meetings to resolve as many of the outstanding issues associated with the Plan as possible. Of the 4 major areas of concern, City and County staffs have reached agreement on two. These issues and their resolution are described below and are included in th.e proposed amendments. http://netfyi/NetFYI/Clients/14c3231 d-164e-41 dl -b716-7667bffa0573/Doc75C1.DOC 1. Use of Countv TIF Only for Capital Projects and Ca ital Programs The Downtown Plan supported the use of TIF funds for a variety of capital projects, as well as redevelopment programs and initiatives. The County requested more specific information on the types of programs to be funded, the amount of funding and the timeframe for expenditures. The City submitted the requested information. Upon the review of this information the County Administrator indicated the County would not support the County portion of TIF for redevelopment incentives and other non-capital programs such as a revolving loan program and retail lease/relocation incentives. It should be noted that the Board of County Commissioners requested the City to compile information detailing how other CRAs throughout the State use their TIF revenues. Based on the survey conducted, it was determined that other Florida CRAs use TIF to fund the type of programs the County does not want to fund. The proposed amendments to the Downtown Plan clarify that County TIF will only be used for capital projects and programs (see Amendment 7— pages 8-12 of Exhibit A of Ordinance). City TIF will be available to be used for non-capital programs and initiatives. 2. Cost Estimates for Several Identified Capital Projects. Three capital projects did not include cost estimates because the project timeframe for construction is years away. The County staff wanted estimates included for all projects. The City's best possible estimates have been developed and are proposed to be included in the Capital Improvement Plan. These revisions are reflected in Amendment 5, pages 5— 7 of the ordinance. Two remaining issues require specific policy direction from the City Commission and are discussed below. 1. Len of TIF. The length of the TIF has not been resolved. Originally, the City Administration desired TIF to be in effect for 30 years from the date of the approval of the updated Plan which is as established by the Florida Statutes. In addition, a longer period of time is more useful to affect redevelopment through the capital projects and programs whose purpose is to eliminate slum and blighting conditions in an under performing downtown. The County Administration desires TIF to be approved for a short- term period of 15 years due to concerns about the uncerta.in future of the County budget. Several solutions have been explored between County and City staff. One solurion discussed was that the County would approve the use of TIF for a 30-year term with a review after 15 years. However, when the County reviews the Downtown progress in 15 years, the County would be limited by the Florida Statute provision that restricts the decision to a continuation of TIF funds at the 95% level or complete elimination of both County and City TIF. This option clearly carries enormous risk for the City since elimination of a major source of funding could be done prior to completion of substantial improvements within the Downtown. A second alternative explored was a TIF term for 15 years if no bonds are issued by the City OR a 20 year term if bonds are issued within the first year after final Plan approval. The City Administration prefers this alternative since it allows the City more flexibility in funding options. In addition, three current or pending projects have obligated substantially all of the TIF project funding for the next three years. These projects include the loan payment for the Dixnmitt property, incentives to be provided for the Beck project and payment for the Cleveland Streetscape and Station Square Park capital projects. At this point, it is not clear if the County administration will support this option. 2. Inclusion of Table Identi ing Funding Sources for all Ca itap 1 Projects in Plan The County Administrator requested that the City include an amendment that adds a table entitled Clearwater powntown Redevelonment Plan Capital Proiects — Table Identifyin Funding Sources for http://netfyi/NetFYl/Clients/14c3231 d-1 b4e-41d1-b71 b-76b7bffa0573/Doc75C2.DOC all Capital Projects (copy attached as an exhibit). The Table estimates the funding sources for each project, differentiating the amount of TIF funds versus other eligible funding sources. This chart is not included in these amendments because the City Administration believes this requested level of detail is not appropriate for inclusion in a 20-year plan, but more appropriately should be reflected in the City's five-year capital improvement budget adopted annually by the City Commission. All redevelopment capital improvement projects conducted to implement the Downtown Plan must be consistent with the Capital Improvement Plan, but the City reserves the right to determine the ex�.ct amount and source of funding at the time that the project is formally initiated by its inclusion in the capital budget. The City Administrarion recommends that this table not be included in the Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan. T'he Community Development Board will review the proposed amendments to the Clearwater pownto�un Redevelopment Plan in its capacity as the Local Planning Agency (LPA) at its regularly scheduled meeting on November 18, 2003 and the Planning Department will report its recommendation at the November 20`� Commission meeting. http://ne�i/NetFYI/Clients/14c3231 d-164e-41 dl-b716-76b76fj'a0573/Doc75C2.DOC ORDINANCE NO. 7231-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED AND AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 7153-03 IN ORDER TO AMEND CHAPTER 3 LAND USE PLAN/REDEVELOPMENT PLAN REGARDING THE ATTRACTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF A RETAIVENTERTAINMENT COMPLEX; TO AMEND DOWNTOWN STRATEGIES, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND THE TAX INCREMENT REVENUE PROJECTIONS SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 4 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLAN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has the authority pursuant to Rules Governing the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended, Section 2.3.3.8.5, to adopt and enforce a specific plan for redevelopment in an urban center in accordance with the Central Business District plan category, and said Section requires that a special area plan therefore be approved by the local govemment; and WHEREAS, the City Commission approved the 1995 Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan on August 17, 1995 and the Downtown Periphery Plan update on April 19, 2001; and WHEREAS, the City Commission approved the updated 2003 Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan on September 18, 2003 by adopting Ordinance No. 7153-03; and WHEREAS, the requirements of Florida Statutes Section 163.360 regarding the adoption of community redevelopment plans have been met regarding that portion of the amendments proposed hereby which affect the Downtown Community Redevelopment Area, andl the requirements of Florida Statutes Section 163.346 regarding notice to taxing authorities and other required notice, as well as all other requirements of Florida Statutes Chapter 163, have been met; and WHEREAS, the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners reviewed the Plan adopted by Ordinance No. 7153-03 on October 21, 2003 and recommended that certain amendments to the Ordinance be made regarding the use of tax increment financing by the �ity of Clearwater); and WHEREAS, it is advisable to add certain provisions to the Plan regarding attraction and development of a retail/entertainment complex, and to amend downtown strategies; and WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency has reviewed the pro�osed amendments and recommends them to the City Commission, and the amended Plan shall serve as the Community Redevelopment Plan for the downtown Community Redevelopment Area of the City of Clearwater; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were reviewed by the Community Development Board, which is the land planning agency for the City of Clearwater for purposes of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, and the Community Ordinance No. 7231-03 , Devetopment Board found the proposed amendments to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Clearwater; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 95-65 was adopted on August 8, 2002 which declared the area generally east of the Redevelopment District as containing slum and blighted conditions and detrimental to the sound growth of the area; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments conforms to the general plan of the City of Clearwater as a whole; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the rehabilitation or redevelopment of the Plan area by private enterprise; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The amendments to the Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby adopted. Section 2. The City Manager or designee shall forward said amendments to any agency required by law or rule to review or approve same. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, subject to the approval by the Pinellas County Board of County Commissioners and the Countywide Planning Authority. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to form: ta ` ,. : �� . �,:- � i L. _;�,%1 �`, �,; , ' � �, Leslie K. Dougall-Sid s Assistant City Attorney Brian J. Aungst Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk 2 Ordinance No. 7153-03 EXHIBIT A Ordinance No. 7231-03 AMENDMENT 1— CHAPTER 3 LAND USE/REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES SECTION Insert new Policy 23 on Page 53 of the Plan and renumber the remaining Policies. Policv 23: The City shall evaluate the need, size and location for a parkin�garag,e�s) to support entertainment, retail and/or restaurant uses. The Citv mav support the development of these uses through the construction of a gara�participation in a public/private partnership to build a gara�e or contributions to assist in the construction of a garage. AMENDMENT 2— CHAPTER 3 LAND USE/REDEVELOPMENT PLAN DOWNTOWN CHARACTER DISTRICTS SECTION — TOWN LAKE BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT Amend District Vision — Use Subsection on Page 72 of the Plan as follows: Use The Town Lake Business Pazk District is envisioned to be a Downtown location for office park development. The District should be redeveloped with corporate and professional offices, as well as those conducting research and/or light assembly. Incidental support commercial uses are anticipated to serve the offices in the District. . Residential development or entertainment with supporting retaiUrestaurant uses mav be considered in limited locations along major streets and if an entire block is assembled for the redevelopment project. ***� AMENDMENT 3— CHAPTER 4 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION DOWNTOWN STRATEGIES SECTION Insert new Strategy 20 on page 146 as follows and renumber the remaiHing strategies: (this strategy is to be located as a new item within the Downtown Strategies and before the beginning of Downtown Core Character District Strategies) *��* Strategv 20: Market the Downtown as a location for a movie theater and assist the developer, as needed, in the acquisition and assembly of land for either the theater and/or parkin� facilities, and/or development of parking facilities to su�port the use. **�* Exhibit A- Ordinance No. 7231-03 , AMENDMENT 4— CHAPTER 4 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION DOWNTOWN STRATEGIES SECTION Insert new Strategy 20 in Table 7 Summary of Public Strategies on page 149 and renumber the remaini�zg strategies as follows: (This strategy is to be located before the beginning of Downtown Core Character District Strategies) Table 7 Summary of Public Strategies # Strate Lead De artment Timin 20 Movie Theater MarketinQ Economic Development Ongoing Strate,g.v AMENDMENT 5— CHAPTER 4 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CAPTIAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) SECTION Ame�d Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Section (including Tables 8 and 9) starting ott page 152 of the Plan as follows: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) To implement the Downtown Plan, the City is committed to investing in the Downtown. Below are a variety of significant Capital Improvement Projects, short- to long-term in nature, addressing streetscape, road improvements, public uses, utilities and pazks (Map 12, page 157). The costs of projects identified range between Q' ^^ ��"�^M *� Q' AO �ke� $157 million to $161 million. This Cauital Improvement Plan was based on several assumptions• the cost for each capital proiect is based on the best estimate available durin dg evelopment of this plan• all costs are shown in 2003 dollars: proiect scope and funding sources mav varv as determined durin� snecific proiect bud e� t and planning nhase• Penny for Pinellas fundin� is assumed to be extended and will be based on the City'�riorities as determined at time of extension. Revisions to the Downtown Capital Improvement Plan may be made b,�the Citv Commission durin� their annual bud�et process and all changes shall be reflected in the Citv's adonted Annual Operating and Capital Imnrovement Budget. All chan es shall be consistent with the oals, objectives and nolicies of this Plan. 2 Exhibit A- Ordinance No. 7231-03 Table 8 Redevelo ment Pro'ects/CIP Project Name FY Location Existing/Potential Cost Fundin Source Wayfinding Sign 2003/2004 S.R. 60 & Highland CDBG*, TIF**, $750,000 Package Avenue intersection General Fund directing traffic to Downtown; Court & Chestnut Streets at their intersections with Missouri, Myrtle, Osceola & Fort Harrison Avenues; Drew Street at its intersection with Missouri, Fort Harrison, Osceola & Myrtle Avenues Fort Harrison 2003/2004 The entire length of Fort FDOT*** $8.6M Avenue/Alternate Harrison Avenue within U.S. Highway 19 Clearwater Resurfacin Pump Station 2003/2004 South side of the west Water and Sewer $698,500 #16 end of Pierce Street Bond Pump station #12 2003/2004 900 North Osceola Water and Sewer $186,000 Avenue (in front of Bond Clearwater Ba Marina). Cleveland Street 2004 - Between Osceola and Penny for Pinellas, $3.7M Streetsca e 2006 M le Avenues TIF and Private Intersection 2004/2005 Based on traffic study Gas Tax and $1 M Improvements after bridge opens Transportation Im act Fees Myrtle Avenue 2004/2005 Myrtle Avenue between Stormwater Utility $12M Reconstruction North Fort Harrison TIF 1M and Avenue & Lakeview Streetscane Road (including stormwater outfall from Town Lake to Clearwater Harbor) Station Square 2005/2006 The north side of Private and TIF $1M Park Cleveland Street between Redevelo ment East & Garden Avenues Clearwater 2004/2005 Turner Street to Oak Pinellas County, $1.2M Beach Connector Avenue to beach (2,000 Penny for Pinellas, (includes Spur (Pinellas feet within Downtown) CMAQ**** entire Trail ro'ect Exhibit A- Ordinance No. 7231-03 Table 8, cont'd Redevelo ment Pro'ects/CIP Gulf to Bay 2004 - Gulf to Bay Boulevard & FDOT (for paving $1.SM Boulevard and 2006 Highland Avenue only), TIF and Highland Avenue Intersection CDBG, Penny for Gateway Pinellas Intersection Im rovement Fort Harrison 2004 - Drew Street to Private, Pinellas $3.7M Avenue 2006 Court/Chestnut Streets County, Grants and Streetsca e TIF Glen Oaks Park 2004/2005 Immediately south of the Stormwater Utility, $4.3M Stormwater powntown area at the SWFWIVID Retention intersection of Court Facilit Street & Bett Lane Memorial 2004 - Chestnut Street to the FDOT, Grant and $500,000 Causeway Bridge 2006 east end of the Memorial Special Landsca in Causewa Brid e Develo ment Fund Cleveland Street 2005 Between Fredrica & FDOT $870,000 and Gulf to Bay Highland Avenues Boulevard R avin Cleveland Street 2005 Between Island Way & FDOT $960,000 & Memorial Fort Harrison Avenue Causeway R avin Main Fire Station 2005/2006 Originally planned to Penny for Pinellas $4.6M rebuild on existing site. Currently reviewing available property on the S. Fort Harrison Avenue corridor between Court Street & Lakeview Road Osceola Avenue 2005 - East side of North Parking fund= � $�-- Gara�e (�58-- 2007 Osceola Avenue between Private, TIF and �-5_5 �AAA- ap� 375 — Drew &-�a Cleveland Bonds — 7.SM 500 spaces) Streets ��„ +'�° ��°� ��+'�° ***** Redevelopment 2005 - To be determined based Parking fund, 5.5 — Garage ( app. 2010 on location of major Private, TIF and 7.SM 375 — 500 entertainment and/or Bonds �aces) (*==**1 restaurant/retail ro'ect s Exhibit A- Ordinance No. 7231-03 Table 8, cont'd Redevelo ment Pro'ects/CIP Reuse of 2006/2007 Current site of Penny for Pinellas, TBD Existing Main Downtown Main Fire TIF and Grant Fire Station Station Coachman Park 2005 - Coachman Park — Park portion: $14.SM Redevelopment 2008 expanded to include the General Fund, ($7.S1Vn and 450 existing park site and the Private, Penny for space Garage area on the south side of Pinellas and TIF ($7M) Cleveland Street Garage portion: Private, Parking S stem and TIF Downtown 2006/2007 Coachman Park on the Revenue Bond, $SM Marina north and south sides of Private and TIF the brid e Pinellas Trail 2006/2007 East Avenue between Grants and Penny $3M and East Avenue Drew Street & Druid for Pinellas widenin Road New City Hall 2006/2007 Vacant site to the south Sa1e revenue from $13.SM and associated of the MSB along Pierce existing site and parking Street between South Bonds M le & East Avenues Osceola Avenue 2005 - Osceola between Drew & Private, Pinellas $3M Streetsca e 2010 Court Count and TIF Cleveland Street 2007 — Between Highland & TIF, Private and $8.6M and Gulf to Bay 2015 Myrtle Avenues CDBG Boulevard Streetsca e Commercial 2010+ Per Master Streetscape TIF, Bond, Private �B Streets "A" and Plan and Penny for SM "B" Pinellas Court/Chestnut 2010+ Per Master Streetscape TIF, Private, Bond �B Beach Corridors Plan (from bridge to SR and Penny for SM Streetscape 60 & Highland Avenue Pinellas intersection Beach to Bluff 2010+ Along the Memorial Federal Grant, $40M Guideway Bridge between the Private, FDOT, Downtown and the Federal Transit Marina area of the Beach Authori Exhibit A- Ordinance No. 7231-03 Table 8, cont'd Redevelo ment Pro'ects/CIP New PSTA 2010+ Existing PSTA Site at the PSTA, Penny for �� Multi-modal SW corner of Pierce Pinellas, Pinellas 3M transportation Street and Garden County, Parking Citv center Avenue Fund. TIF Share * Community Development Block Grant; ** Ta1c Increment Financing; *** Florida Department of Transportation; ****Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement= ***** The snecific size of the two ara�es will be determined at the time of project plannin� based on redevelopment activitv and intensities• the sizes of the two �ara�es mav varv from the sizes stated to accommodate the parking demand up to a maximum of $15 million combined cost for the two �� 6 Exhibit A- Ordinance No. 7231-03 Table 9 Redevelo ment Pro'ects/CIP Arran ed b T e of Pro'ect Pro'ect Name FY Cost Street Re avin esurfacin (total $2�4.43 M) Fort Harrison Avenue/Alt. U.S. Hi wa 19 Resurfacin FDOT) * 2003/2004 $&.6M Myrtle Avenue Reconstruction * and Streetscaue 2005 �� 13M Cleveland Street and Gulf to Ba Boulevard R avin FDOT) * 2005 $870,000 Cleveland Street & Memorial Causewa R avin (FDOT) * 2005 $964,000 Intersection Im rovements* 2004/2005 $1 M Utilities and Infrastructure (total $16.184M— $20.184 M Osceola Avenue (�-59---�A9A 375 — 500 spaces) 2005 - 2007 $�-}-� 5_5 — 7.SM Redevelo ment Gara e 375 — 500 s aces 2005 — 2010 $5.5 --- 7.SM Pum Station #16* 2003/2004 $698,500 Pum Station #12* 2003/2004 $18G,000 Glen Oaks Park Stormwater Retention Facilit * 2004/2005 $4.3M Streetsca e Im rovements/Landsca in (total e'� 31.75M ** Wa findin Si Packa e 2003/2004 $75Q,000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Highland Avenue Gateway Intersection 2004 - 2006 $1.SM Im rovement Fort Harrison Avenue Streetsca e 2004 - 2006 $3.7M Memorial Causewa Brid e Landsca in 2004 - 2006 $SOf},000 Cleveland Street Streetscape Funding available upon approval of revised 2004 - 2006 $3,.7M Penn or Pinellas list durin FY 03/04 Bud et a roval rocess Osceola Avenue Streetsca e 2005 - 2010 $3M Cleveland Street and Gulf to Ba Boulevard Streetsca e 2007 — 2015 $8.6M Commercial Streets "A" and "B"* 2010+ �� SM Court/Chestnut Streets Beach Corridors Streetsca e* 2010+ �� SM Parks and Recreation Facilities total $24. 7 M Clearwater Beach Connector Spur (Pinellas Trail)* 2004/2005 $1.2M (incl:udes entire ro'ect Coachman Park Redevelo ment $7.SM and 450 s ace Gara e$7M 2005 -2008 $14.SM Downtown Marina 2006/2007 $SM Station S uare Pazk Redevelo ment 2005/2006 $1 M Pinellas Trail and East Avenue widenin 2006/2007 $3M Public Uses (total $3&�-61.1 M**) New Cit Hall and Associated Parkin 2006/2007 $13.SM Main Fire Station* 2005/2006 $4.6M Reuse of Existin Main Fire Station 2006/2007 TBD** Beach to Bluff Guidewa 2010+ $40M New PSTA Multi-modal transportation center 2010+ �� 3M * Funding approved in adopted CIP or awarded grant ** Total does not include those projects the costs of which are to be determined at a future date 7 Exhibit A- Ordinance No. 7231-03 AMENDMENT 6- CHAPTER 4 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CAPTIAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) SECTION Amend Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Section, Capital Project Descriptions subsection on Page 162 by revising the Osceola Avenue Parking Garage description and by inserting a project description for Redevelopment Garage following the Osceola Avenue Parking garage as follows: ***** Osceola Avenue Parkin� Garage (�38�A88 375 — 500 saaces): Due to the strategic location of this prime redevelopment site "Superblock", a public/private partnership may enable the construction of a major powntown parking garage to service the block's redevelopment potential, and the redevelopment activities which might occur on the parcels lying west of Osceola Avenue. This parking garage will also provide additional parking for the new Main Library, currently under construction Redevelopment Gara�e (375 — 500 suaces): As maior redevelonment occurs, it is anticipated that one or more major entertainment and restaurant mixed use vroiect(s) will be developed Downtown. Due to the high parkin� demand of these types of uses, this garage would be sited and constructed to support the entertainment activitv. The specific location of the �a�e will be determined based on the location of the entertainment project(s) and will provide parking for it and other nlanned/approved downtown redevelopment projects. **** AMENDMENT 7- CHAPTER 4 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION TAX INCREMENT REVENUE PROJECTIONS SECTION Amend Tax Increment Revenue Section of Plan on page 183. The amendments are located prior to the "Tax Increment Revenue Projections for the Original CRA District" subsection of the Plan and are as follows: Tax Increment Revenue Projections Based on this overview, it is evident that the CRA has the potential for developing several million square feet of development over the next two decades, including the attraction of up to 1,000 new urban housing units in the next five to ten years in the downtown core which will act as a catalyst for a substantial amount of new o�fice use, retail and entertainment establishments. If all of the projects described above are realized, the increase in the tax roll could be upwards of $390 million. 8 Exhibit A- Ordinance No. 7231-03 However, while opporiunities are outstanding, it is the intent of the CRA to proceed forward cautiously with our TIF projections. The TIF projections are calculated separately for the original CRA and the expanded CRA because the base years for the property values are different. The CRA envisions continuing to use both the City's and the Countv's share of Tax Increment Financing dollars for capital projects in the original and expanded CR.A. TIF is identified as one of the funding sources for several capita.l and infrastructure improvement projects outlined in the Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) section of this plan. These projects include the Cleveland Street, Fort Harrison, and Gulf to Bay Streetscapes and the Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Highland Avenue Gateway Intersection. In addition, TIF will be used for paying impact fees, "buying in" of public pazking in private projects, assembling redevelopment sites, purchasing land and/or buildings, affordable and transitional housin�projects, and fa�ade improvement grants. Below is a summarv of the programs and initiatives that will use TIF as well as the estimated costs associated with each. The County's share of TIF shall only be used for the capital nrojects included in the table below. The Citv's share of TIF inav be used for any initiative listed in the table. * � � On�g Ongoing �g On�g ��g On�g *Capital projects and iniriatives - County TIF shall onlv be used for these programs CRA Area Brownfields Environmental Cleanuu Proiects $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $21,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Due to the limited availabilitv of state and federal environmental cleanup funds, TIF dollars will be required for environmental remediation for multiple projects, particularly those that have a historv of petroleum contamination. A case in point is the Clearwater Auto Salvage Yard that is being acquired bv the City, as well as a number of sites lving adjacent to the CGI (formerly IMR l�obal�pus west of Missouri. Project Cost: $5.0 million Time Frame: On� ing 9 Exhibit A- Ordinance No. 7231-03 CRA Buildin� Fa�ade Imqrovement Pro�ram This is an on�oin�pro�ram funded by the CRA in concert with our Main Street Pro� The Facade Improvement Prog� provides �rants and loans to eli�ible business Qroperty owners and tenants who wish to upgrade their exterior building facades. Project Cost: $1.0 million Time Frame: On o�ing Downtown Land Acauisition A critical function of the CRA is to assemble propertv for resale and redevelopment by the private sector. The principal purpose of p�erty assemblv is to assist in eliminati� the slum and bli�ht conditions that exist within the CRA bv facilitatin� rivate redevelovment of these under-uerformin� sites. This program enables the CRA to assemble, purchase and option property and structures within the CRA for redevelopment purposes consistent with this Plan. Examples of nropert ��acquisitions anticipated by this pr�am include but are not limited to: acpuirin� propertv in the Town Lake Business Park Character District to facilitate the development of a suburban office campus• acquirin�property in the East Gatew� Character District to eliminate the problematic uses and/or contaminated sites to imnrove the substandard housin� condirions and to consolidate obsolescent and/or sites undersized as comnared to current zonin requirements to allow commercial redevelopment• acauirin� uropertv within the Downtown to assist in the develonment of a major entertainment attraction including a movie theater entertainment retail and/or restaurant uses. Other nropertv acquisitions that implement the oals objectives and policies of this Plan may be achieved through the use of this CRA pro�. Total Cost: $21.0 million Time Frame: Ongoing CRA Redeveloument Incentive Fundin� Historicallv, the CRA has utilized TIF revenues to assist redevelopment efforts in a variet o�ys such as• landscape and streetscaUe improvements property acquisition construction of nublic narkin� �arages, pavment of project permit and impact fees pavrnent of nroiect utilitv connection and stormwater fees parkin� incentives to retain downtown businesses. subsidv to the Jolley Trolle�perations and the fa�ade improvement program. Downtown redevelonment is eg nerallv considered to be more exnensive and risk i� unproven market than develonment in other areas of a cit� d especiallv when compared to development in �reenfields. This situation currentiv exists in Downtown Clearwater as demonstrated bv the lack of substantial new private redevelopment with few exceptions 10 Exhibit A- Ordinance No. 7231-03 The lack of investment in Downtown has resulted in the poor economic health of Downtown to which the Cit i�pondin� with this Plan. This program will provide financial incentives to developers to offset the high land, development and construction costs within the Downtown and to encourage investment in Downtown that will revitalize the_center citYwith people, emplovees, businesses and activities. The types of incentives contemplated by this program include, but are not limited to: pavment of project permit and impact fees; pavment of project utilitv connection and stormwater fees; parking and other financial incentives to retain and attract downtown businesses• and contributions for parking facilities. Total Cost: $10.0 million Time Frame: On�oing Retail Lease/Location Incentives In order to achieve the concentration and/or location of the desired retail mazket in the Downtown, it may be necessarv to negotiate with existing tenants in regard to existing leases or terms for relocation. This consideration mav require significant cost to achieve a desired mix and phvsical orientation/location for these businesses. Total Cost: $5.0 million Time Frame: On oing CRA Affordable and Transitional Housing Proiects The development of one or more mixed-income housin��nrojects within the CRA has been identified as a necessarv strategv due to the need to retain affordable housing �tions in this environment. Typically, the CRA would leverage its position in a public- private partnership b,y contributing funds to effectuate the lower income criteria in a new r� oi ect• A major component of the rehabilitation of the CRA Expansion Area and the need for affordable housin� is the redevelopment of the Clearwater Homeless Intervention Pro'�ect �CHIP) site into a"transitional" and "permanent" housing campus. The campus concept for CHIP would entail assemblin�propertv between Park Street, the Stevenson Creek channel, Evergreen Avenue, and Cleveland Street into a self-contained and secure c�us• TIF funding would be used to assist in the purchase of properties, while other state and federal funds would be used for housing construction and operations. Total Cost: $5.0 million Time Frame: On�oing 11 Exhibit A- Ordinance No. 7231-03 CRA Revolving Loan Fund A key component of our future redevelopment strategy for the downtown is the implementation of a public-private revolving loan program with local financial institutions. Modeled after successful programs in other cities, a ioint pool would be established and loans provided for expanding businesses, buildin� improvements, relocation costs, etc. The CRA would provide seed capital to the pool, alon�private capital from the banks. Total Cost: $1.0 million Time Frame: Ongoing **** 12 Exhibit A- Ordinance No. 7231-03 Updated 11/'14/2003 CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CAPITAL PROJECTS continued YEARS 2003-2018 YEARS 2019 - 2033 TIF OTHER TOTAL TIF OTHER TOTAL PROGRAMS & INITIATIVES Brownsfield Cleanup 2.5M 0 2.5M 2.5M 0 2.5M Building Farade Improvements .5M 0 .5M .5M 0 .5M Downtown Land 16M 0 16M 5M 0 5M Affordable Housing Project 3M 0 3M 2M 0 2M SUBTOTAL - $22M $0 $22M $10M $0 $10M PROGRAMS & INITIATIVES GRAND TOTAL $58.2M $28.95M $87.15M $23M 0 $23M s\Planning Dept\Downtown Redev. Plan Capital Projects.xls :? of 2 CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CARITAL PROJECTS Wayfinding Sign Package Myrtle Ave Reconstruction Cleveland St. Streetscape Station Square Park Redev. Gulf-To-Bay Blvd/Highland Gateway Intersection Fort Harrison Ave Streetscape Osceola Ave Garage � Redevelopment Garage Reuse of Existing Main Fire Station Coachman Park Redev. & 450- Space Garage Downtown Marina Osceola Ave. Streetscape Commercial Streets A/B Court/Chestnut Beach Corridor Streetscape PSTA Transportation Center SUBTOTAL- CAPITAL PROJECTS YEARS 2003-2018 ti TIF OTHER TOTAL ' Shown in MiJlions of Dollars 0 .75M .75M 1M 12M 13M 0 3.7M 3.7M 1M 0 1M 0 1.5M 1.5M 3.2M .5M 3.7M 4M 3.5M 7.5M 4M 3.5M 7.5M 4M 12.5M 4M 2.5M 0 4M 2M 14.5M 1M 5M 5M 3M 0 5M 0 5M 3M $36.2M $28.95M $65.15 $13M Updated 19/14/2d03 2019 - 2033 �� 0 5M 0 5M 3M $0 $13M slPlanning DeptlDowntown Redev. Plan Capital Projects.xls 1 of 2 Exhibit "B" Other Activities: BARTOW: CEDAR KEY: PALMETTO: BOYNTON BCH: SAFETY HARBOR: COMPARISON OF FLORIDA CRA's TIF Expenditures and Activities Cultural Heritage Facility & Annual Aeritage Summit Grant Writing Rehabilitation of Public Facilities First Station, City Hall and Library Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Promotion and Marketing Trolley Underwrite Bonds for Museum Special Events Public Art Utility Payments Chamber Sponsorship Downtown Brochure JACKSONVILLE BCH: Duval County adopted ordinance allowing for construction of a new fire station ESCAMBIA COUNTY: Utility cost for outdoor lighting and sprinkler system Development Incentives: CAPE CORAL: C�I�X��11��.��7__.�'1 HOLLY HILL: PALMETTO: PUNTA GORDA: BOYNTON BEACH: Impact Fee Rebate (max $15,000) Fast Track Development Review Property Improvement Grants Property Improvement Grants Rebate of Impact and Permit Fees (case-by-case) Property Improvement Grants 50% Refund of Increment (over 10 years) EXCERPTS FROM APPROVED CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CHAPTER 3 LAND USE PLAN/REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Goals, Obj ectives, and Policies Section Policies Subsection - page 53 of Plan Downtown Character Districts Section Town Lake Business Park District Subsection — page 72 of Plan -page 53 of Plan- Policy 15: The City shall make use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for Downtown infrastructure and increasing affordable housing options. Policy 16: Prior to the disposition of City and/or CRA-owned properties, the City shall determine the most appropriate use consistent with the Plan in consultation with the applicable neighborhood associations and/or business groups. Policy 17: Property owners/developers are encouraged to meet with area neighborhood associations/business groups prior to submitting a major redevelopment project for City review. Policy 18: The City shall assist neighborhoods in the formation and development of neighborhood associations that empower residents to improve their neighborhood and strengthen ties between residents and government. Policy 19: Residential development shall provide appropriate on-site recreation facilities based on the scale of the proj ect. Policy 20: Shared parking for commercial, office and mixed uses should be accomplished wherever possible. Policy 21: The City shall pursue all funding options to accelerate the implementation of the Master Streetscape and Wa�nding Plan and Coachman Park Master Plan. Policy 22: The City shall monitor and evaluate traffic operation changes as a result of the new bridge alignment and make any necessary capital or operational improvements to the Downtown traffic network. Policy 23: The City prefers and shall encourage alternative stormwater management solutions rather than installation of on-site stormwater retention ponds. These alternatives may include neighborhood or regional stormwater programs that make significant improvements to the overall stormwater system and environment. Policy 24: The City shall give priority to sidewalk construction within Downtown that enhances pedestrian linkages and/or completes a continuous sidewalk system on all streets. Policy 25: The CRA will evaluate participating with the private sector in land assembly to facilitate projects consistent with this Plan. Policy 26: The CRA will consider abatement of impact fees and permit fees as an incentive for redevelopment projects that are consistent with this Plan. -page 72 of Plan- Town Lake Business Park District The Town Lake Business District is bounded by Cleveland Street on the north, Missouri Avenu�e on the east, Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue on the west and Court Street on the south and is depicted on Map 8, page 57. This District is 43.6 acres in area and is comprised of 120 parcels, which represents 8 percent of the land area of the Downtown Plan area. Existing Character A portion of the area previously known as the Southeast Expansion Area of the Periphery Plan is included in the Town Lake Business Park District. The area is now part of the expanded CRA. At the District's entry point at the southwest corner of Cleveland Street and Missouri Avenue, a new corporate headquarters, suburban in character was constructed within the last three years. A mi:x of uses including retail, office, utility/infrastructure, residential and nonconfornung industrial uses chazacterizes the remainder of the District. Even though this major office redevelopment has occurred, there are numerous vacant and underutilized parcels found throughout the District. In particulaz, single-family dwellings are scattered throughout the area west of Madison Avenue. District Vision Use The Town Lake Business Park District is envisioned to be a Downtown location for office park development. The District should be redeveloped with corporate and professional offices, as well as those conducting research and/or light assembly. Incidental support commercial uses are anticipated to serve the offices in the District. Residential redevelopment may be considered in limited locations along major streets or if a minimum of four acres of land is assembled. Function The primary function of the Town Lake Business District is to provide employment opportunities and a location for office uses that prefer a business park setting but enjoy the benefits of being in close proximity to the Downtown Core. Excellent access and opportunities for significant lot consolidation enhance the DistricYs redevelopment opportunities. Development Patterns Office development within the Town Lake Business Park District shall be campus-like in nature. Traditional setbacks, significant landscaping and adequate parking should characterize redevelopment in this area. Commercial uses are encouraged to locate within the office park and/or office buildin.g to provide easy access to their customers and reduce the need for external vehicle trips. EXCERPTS FROM APPROVED DOWNTOT��1V CLEAR WATER REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CHAPTER 4 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Downtown Strategies Section — pages 146 and 150 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Section — pages 152 —156, 162 Tax Increment Revenue Projections Section — page 183 -pages 146 and 150 of Plan- Strategy 12: Prepare a traffic analysis to evaluate traffic operations and make intersection improvements subject to that evaluation, after the new bridge opens. Strategy 13: Prepare a traffic analysis to evaluate the ability to designate all or parts of Downtown as a No-Fee Transportation Zone after the new bridge opens. Strategy 14: Evaluate whether or not there are any active septic tanks within the Downtown. If a;�tive septic tanks exist, develop program to eliminate the tank and connect the property to City sewer system. The City shall prioritize the use of CDBG and any other available iunds to accomplish eliminating the septic tanks. Strategy 15: Identify needed improvements to the sidewalk system within Downtown and incorpmrate those improvements into the Capital Improvement Budget beginning in Fiscal Year 2004/2005. Strategy 16: Continue to market redevelopment sites and develop tazgeted markets or sites within each character district to encourage their redevelopment. Strategy 17: Evaluate and develop a flexible Building Code that addresses the special challenges of redeveloping/retrofitting old structures while maintaining the goals of health, safety and welfaze. Strategy 18: Evaluate implementation of the State legislation establishing a Nuisance Abaternent Board to address serious and recurring Code violations and criminal activity. Strategy 19: Continue to implement the Downtown-Gateway Strategic Action program and update on a yeazly basis. Downtown Core Character District Strategies Strategy 20: Continue to implement the agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to redesignate Alternate U.S. Highway 19 from Fort Harrison Avenue to Myrtle Avenue. The City shall also continue to implement the agreement with the FDOT to redesignate State Road 60 from the existing Cleveland Street to the Court/Chestnut Streets pair. Strategy 21: Amend the Community Development Code to revise the payment in-lieu of parking provision. The amendment shall define the applicable geographic area, establish the fee amount by type of use, establish uses that shall not be eligible for the payment in-lieu of fee and establish the allowable uses of the collected fees. Old Bay Character District Strategies Strategy 22: Coordinate with the Salvation Army to ensure that the future redevelopment of the site is compatible with the surrounding areas and at an appropriate scale. Town Lake Residential Character District Strategies Strategy 23: Evaluate engineering alternatives to the stormwater system to effect the elimination of the existing stormwater pond located on the south side of Gould Street midway between Missouri and Madison Avenues. East Gateway Character District Strategies Strategy 24: Evaluate the ability to amortize problematic uses, develop and implement an amortization schedule within the legal framework. Strategy 25: Evaluate the potential public/open space use of the triangular property bounded by Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Cleveland Street and Hillcrest Avenue. The site's prime location could serve as both a gateway for the East Gateway District and as a significant component of the Cleveland Street Streetscape Improvements. The City may consider vacation of Hillcrest Avenue to consolidate the site. Strategy 26: Explore creative solutions to provide a playground to serve the area generally located south of Cleveland Street and southwest of Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Strategy 27: Continue to assist the Clearwater Homeless Intervention Project (CHIP) in its mission to serve the homeless population in Downtown. 5trategy 28: Assist the business owners in creating a Merchants Association to work with the City on marketing and neighborhood employment issues which would improve communications between the City and business owners. Strategy 29: Assist the residents of the East Gateway in creating a Neighborhood Association to serve as the neighborhood's voice, improve communications between the neighborhood and the City and help foster neighborhood-based solutions to local problems. Strategy 30: Assist the residents of the East Gateway residential areas in the formation of one or more neighborhood crime watch associations. Strategy 31: Provide a more visible community policing presence within the East Gateway neighborhood. Strategy 32: Continue to support the Police Department's Hispanic Outreach Program and Apoyo Center. The Apoyo Center addresses many of the service needs of the neighborhood through partnering with other organizations and businesses. Programs of the Apoyo Center include interpretation services, recruitment of bilingual officers, a victim advocacy outreach program, a domestic violence program, crime prevention and drug and alcohol education. Strategy 33: Continue to support the YWCA/City of Clearwater Hispanic Outreach Center and emphasize continuing and enhanced partnerships with social service agencies to �ssist East Gateway residents. Programs include childcare, diplomatic intervention, adult education, English classes, GED instruction, computer and job training and other related services as the need arises. Strategy 34: Research implementing a low-interest loan program to assist businesses with a variety of activities including the acquisition of buildings and/or properties and the rehabilitation or new construction of new office or commercial space. Strategy 35: Work with the Clearwater Regional Chamber of Commerce to target small business needs. Strategy 36: Establish partnerships with local banks to facilitate conventional loans to businesses in the area. Table 7 Summa of Public Strate ies # Strategy Lead Department Timing 1 a Residential Incentives Study Planning/ Economic Within one year of Development Plan adoption lb Commercial Incentives Study Economic Development Within one year of Plan ado tion 2 Zoning Study Planning/ Economic FY 04/OS Develo ment 3 Code Amendment on Planning Within one year of Minimum Standard Uses and Plan adoption Plan Consistency 4 Code Amendment on Public Planning Within one year of Amenities Incentives Pool Plan adoption 5 Code Amendment on TDRs Planning Within one year of Plan ado tion 6 Evaluation of Historic District Planning FY 03/04 Potential 7 Historic Preservation Pla.nning FY 03/04 Incentives Study 8 Educational Program for Neighborhood Services Within one year of Owners Division Plan Adoption 9 Fa�ade Grant Program Economic Development FY 03/04 Expansion 10 Impact Fee Ordinances & Planning FY 03/04 Payment In-Lieu of Providing Parkin Review 11 Designate Downtown as Planning FY 03/04 Urban Redevelo ment Area 12 Traffic Analysis on Public Works/ FY 03/04 Intersection Improvements Engineering 13 Traffic Analysis on Public Works/ FY 03/04 Concurrency Management Engineering Area 14 Septic Tank Study Public Works/ Utilities FY 03/04 Table 7, cont'd. Summa of Public Strate ies 15 Sidewalk Improvements Public Works/ FY 03/04 Study Study Engineering FY 04/OS Begin Incorporation into Capital Improvement Bud et 16 Market Redevelopment Sites Economic Development Ongoing Strategy 17 Evaluate Flexible Building Development Services/ FY 03/04 Code for Old Buildings Planning/ Economic Develo ment 18 Evaluate Establishment of Development Services/ FY 03/04 Nuisance Abatement Board PolicelLegal 19 Downtown-Gateway Strategic Economic Development Ongoing Strategy Action Pro am 20 Redesignation of Alternate Public Works/ By Mid-2004 U.S. Highway 19 (Downtown Engineering Core) 21 Code Amendment on Planning Within one year of Payment in lieu of Parking Plan adoption (Downtown Core) 22 Coordinate with Salvation Planning/ Economic Ongoing Arm Odd Ba Develo ment 23 Stormwater Pond Evaluation Public Works/ FY 03/04 (Town Lake Residential) Engineering 24 Amortization of Problematic Economic Development/ FY 03/04 Uses Study Legal (East Gatewa ) 25 Gateway/Public Use Site Economic Developmenb FY 04/OS Study Planning (East Gateway) 26 Playground Evaluation Parks FY 03/04 (East Gatewa ) 27 Assist CHIP Economic Development Ongoing Strategy (East Gateway) 28 Merchants Association Neighborhood Services/ Monitor and assist Creation Economic Development upon critical mass of East Gatewa ) business activi Table 7, cont'd. Summa of Public Strate ies 29 Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Services/ Within one yeaz of Creation Economic Development Plan adoption (East Gateway) East Gatewa 30 Neighborhood Crime Watch Neighborhood Services/ Within one year of Association Creation Police Plan adoption (East Gatewa 31 Continue Community Police Begin within six Policing months of Plan (East Gateway) adoption; Ongoing Strate 32 Hispanic Outreach Program Police Ongoing Strategy and Apoyo Center (East Gatewa 33 YWCA/City of Clearwater YWCA, Social Service Ongoing Strategy Hispanic Outreach Center Agencies (East Gatewa ) 34 Loan Interest Loan Study Economic Development FY 04/OS (East Gatewa and Housin 35 Small Business Partnership Economic Development Ongoing Strategy (East Gatewa and Housin 36 Local Bank Partnerships (East Economic Development Ongoing Strategy Gatewa and Housin -pages 152 —156 of Plan- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) To implement the Downtown Plan, the City is committed to investing in the Downtown. Below are a variety of significant Capital Improvement Projects, short- to long-term in nature, addressing streetscape, road improvements, public uses, utilities and pazks (Map 12, page 157). The costs of projects ider�tified range between $144 million to $148 million. Table 8 Redevelo ment Pro'ects/CIP Project Name Fy Location Existing/Potential COSt Fundin Source Wayfinding Sign 2003/2004 S.R. 60 & Highland CDBG*, TIF**, $750,000 Package Avenue intersection General Fund directing traffic to Downtown; Court & Chestnut Streets at their intersections with Missouri, Myrtle, Osceola & Fort Harrison Avenues; Drew Street at its intersection with Missouri, Fort Harrison, Osceola & Myrtle Avenues Fort Hairison 2003/2004 T'he entire length of Fort FDOT*** $8.6M Avenue/Alternate Harrison Avenue within U.S. Highway 19 Clearwater Resurfacin Pump Station 2003/2004 South side of the west Water and Sewer $698,500 #16 end of Pierce Street Bond Pump station #12 2003/2004 900 North Osceola Water and Sewer $186,000 Avenue (in front of Bond Clearwater Ba Marina . Cleveland Street 2004 - Between Osceola and Penny for Pinellas, $3.7M Streetsca e 2006 M le Avenues TIF and Private Station Square 2005/2006 The north side of Private and TIF $1M Park Cleveland Street between Redevelo ment East & Garden Avenues Clearwater 2004/2005 Turner Street to Oak Pinellas County, $1.2M Beach Connector Avenue to beach (2,000 Penny for Pinellas, (includes Spur (Pinellas feet within Downtown) CMAQ**** entire Trail) ro'ect) Gulf to Bay 2004 - Gulf to Bay Boulevard & FDOT (for paving $1.SM Boulevard and 2006 Highland Avenue only), TIF and Highland Avenue Intersection CDBG, Penny for Gateway Pinellas Intersection Im rovement Fort Harrison 2004 - Drew Street to Private, Pinellas $3.7M Avenue 2006 Court/Chestnut Streets County, Grants and Streetsca e TIF Glen Oaks Park 2004/2005 Immediately south of the Stormwater Utility, $4.3M Stormwater powntown azea at the SWFWMD Retention intersection of Court Facilit Street & Bett Lane Memorial 2004 - Chestnut Street to the FDOT, Grant and $500,000 Causeway Bridge 2006 east end of the Memorial Special Landsca in Causeway Brid e Develo ment Fund Cleveland Street 2005 Between Fredrica & FDOT $870,000 and Gulf to Bay Highland Avenues Boulevard R avin Cleveland Street 2005 Between Island Way & FDOT $960,000 & Memorial Fort Harrison Avenue Causeway R avin Main Fire Station 2005/2006 Originally planned to Penny for Pinellas $4.6M rebuild on existing site. Currently reviewing available property on the S. Fort Harrison Avenue corridor between Court Street & Lakeview Road Osceola Avenue 2005 - East side of North Parking fund and $11 - Parking Garage 2007 Osceola Avenue between Private 15M (750 - 1,000 Drew & Laura Streets (in spaces) the area of the AM South buildin Reuse of 2006/2007 Current site of Penny for Pinellas, TBD Existing Main Downtown Main Fire TIF and Grant Fire Station Station Coachman Park 2005 - Coachman Park — Park portion: $14.SM Redevelopment 2008 expanded to include the General Fund, ($7.SM) and 450 existing park site and the Private and Penny space Garage area on the south side of for Pinellas ($7M) Cleveland Street Garage portion: Private and Parkin S stem Downtown 2006/2007 Coachman Park on the Revenue Bond and $SM Marina north and south sides of Private the brid e Pinellas Trail and 2006/20U7 East Avenue between Grants and Penny $3M East Avenue Drew Street & Druid for Pinellas widenin Road New City Hall 2006/2007 Vacant site to the south Sale revenue from $13.SM and associated of the MSB along Pierce existing site and parking Street between South Bonds M le & East Avenues Osceola Avenue 2005 - Osceola between Drew & Private and $3M Streetsca e 2010 Court Pinellas Count Cleveland Street 2007 — Between Highland & TIF, Private and $8.6M and Gulf to Bay 2015 Myrtle Avenues CDBG Boulevard Streetsca e Commercial 2010+ Per Master Streetscape TIF, Bond, Private TBD Streets "A" and P1an and Penny for "B" Pinellas Court/Chestnut 2010+ Per Master Streetscape TIF, Private Bond TBD Beach Corridors Plan (from bridge to SR and Penny for Streetscape 60 & Highland Avenue Pinellas intersection Beach to Bluff 2010+ Along the Memorial Federal Grant, $40M Guideway Bridge between the Private, FDOT, Downtown and the Federal Transit Marina area of the Beach Authori New PSTA 2010+ Existing PSTA Site at the PSTA, Penny for TBD Multi-modal SW corner of Pierce Pinellas, Pinellas transportation Street and Garden County, Parking center Avenue Fund * Community Development Block Grant; ** Tax Increment Financing; *** Florida Departrnent of Transportation; ****Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement. Table 9 Redevelo ment Pro'ects/CIP Arran ed b T e of Pro'ect Project Name Fy COSt Street Re avin esurfacin (total $23.43 M Fort Hamson Avenue/Alt. U.S. Hi wa 19 Resurfacin (FDOT) * 2003/2004 $8.6M M le Avenue Reconstruction * 2005 $12M Cleveland Street and Gulf to Ba Boulevard R avin (FDOT * 2005 $870,000 Cleveland Street & Memorial Causewa R avin (FDOT * 2005 $960,000 Intersection Im rovements* 2004/2005 $1 M Utilities and Infrastructure total $16.184M— $20.184 M Osceola Avenue Parkin Gaza e(750 - 1,000 s aces) 2005 - 2007 $11 - 15M Pum Station #16* 2003/2004 $698,500 Pum Station #12* 2003/2004 $186,000 Glen Oaks Park Stormwater Retention Facili * 2004/2005 $4.3M Streetsca e Im rovements/Landsca in (total $21. 75 M**) Wa mdin Si Packa e 2003/2004 $750,000 Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Highland Avenue Gateway Intersection 2004 - 2006 $1.SM Im rovement Fort Harrison Avenue Streetsca e 2004 - 2006 $3.7M Memorial Causewa Brid e Landsca in 2004 - 2006 $500,000 Cleveland Street Streetscape Funding available upon approval of revised 2004 - 2006 $3.7M Penn or Pinellas list durin FY 03/04 Bud et a roval rocess Osceola Avenue Streetsca e 2005 - 2010 $3M Cleveland Street and Gulf to Ba Boulevard Streetsca e 2007 — 2015 $8.6M Commercial Streets "A" and "B"* 2010+ TBD** Court/Chestnut Streets Beach Corridors Streetsca e* 2010+ TBD** Parks and Recreation Facilities (total $24. 7 M Clearwater Beach Connector Spur (Pinellas Trail)* 2004/2005 $1.2M (includes entire ro'ect Coachman Park Redevelo ment $7.5 and 450 s ace Gara e($7M 2005 -2008 $14.SM Downtown Marina 2006/2007 $SM Station S uare Pazk Redevelo ment 2005/2006 $1M Pinellas Trail and East Avenue widenin 2006/2007 $3M Public Uses (total $58.1 M** New Cit Hall and Associated Parkin 2006/2007 $13.SM Main Fire Station* 2005/2006 $4.6M Reuse of Existin Main Fire Station 2006/2007 TBD** Beach to Bluff Guideway 2010+ $40M New PSTA Multi-modal trans ortation center 2010+ TBD** * Funding approved in adopted CIP or awarded grant ** Total does not include those projects the costs of which are to be determined at a future date -page 162 of Plan- Osceola Avenue Parking Garage (750 -1,000 snaces): Due to the strategic location of this prime redevelopment site "Superblock", a public/private partnership may enable the construction of a major powntown parking garage to service the block's redevelopment potential, and the redevelopment activities which might occur on the parcels lying west of Osceola Avenue. This parking garage will also provide additional parking for the new Main Library, currently under construction. Reuse of Existin� Main Fire Station: Should the existing Fire Station facility be relocated to an alternative site, the existing Fire Statio� may be reused to store a variety of Police Department or Parks and Recreation Deparhnent equipmen.t and vehicles. Coachman Park Redevelopment and Garage: As part of the future redevelopment of the prime Downtown parcels lying adjacent to Osceola Avenue, the City is planning to construct a park which will act as a significant Downtown waterfront destination. The Coachman Park Amphitheater will be enlarged and relocated on site and Drew Street will terminate at the water providing for a pedestrian promenade along the waters edge and water:&ont restaurant which could be leased to a private operator. A unique interactive fountain would be built as a major focal point. Cleveland Street, west of Osceola Avenue, would be closed and converted into a meandering pedestrian pathway between Downtown and the water. As part of this project, the City may construct or enter into a public-private partnership to construct a gazage in the less appealing southern portion of this 18-acre site near the start of the new bridge. In addition, the current surface parking would be removed in favor of a large "great lawn." Downtown Marina• The City has awarded a consulting contract for the purpose of analyzing the regulatory process for permitting the future construction of a 150 - 200 slip waterfront marina. The marina would be publicly-owned and operated accommodating both power and sail crafts with a mix of permanent and transient slips. A limited number of tourist related ferries and pleasure crafts would be allowed, however, commercial fishing operations would be prohibited. Pinellas Trail and East Avenue Widening: The portion of the Fred E. Marquis Pinellas Trail along East Avenue constitutes the last remai.ning unimproved segment of the trail. The project provides for the addition of a multi-use trail facility� and roadway improvements for approximately 0.7 miles within the East Avenue right-of-way between Drew Street and Druid Road. This includes the replacement of the southbound lane of East Avenue and the sidewalk on the west side of East Avenue with a landscaped, asphalt surface consistent with the Pinellas Trail standards in 2006/2007. Between Turner and Drew Streets the southbound traffic lane of East Avenue and the sidewalk on the west side of East Avenue will be removed. The Pinellas Trail will be reconstructed in the center of this area with landscaping on either side. Exhibit "A" _ __ CRA's _ Aubumdale __ __ _____ Avon Park -. - --- -._-- Bartow _ Bayfront Pa1m,Bay.--- Blountstown Boca Raton _ _ Cape Coral CedarKey , _ Dunetlin _ Holly Hill Palmetto Pensacda Plantation Punta Gorda _ __ Sarasota Tallahassee. _ I � Winterhaven_ 21 Boynton Beach 22 St. Johns Coun� 23 Escambia __ 24 Englewood _ 25 Gulfport 26 Largo -- 27 Miami Beach 29 Omni, Miami 30 Plant Clty 31 Safety Harbor 32 SE OvertowNPark West Wlle Beach Park Contact Andy Stewart _ C.B. Shirey Bob Weeker _ Lee Feldman _ _ Jimmy Hand Chet Hunt _ James Brown Richard Wells Frances Hodges Kevin Campbell Joseph Forte Tonya Lukowiak Donna Prevatt Rochelle Bach/M. Berk Willard Beck _ Billy Robinson Michael Parker Sam Hamilton Michael McMahon Doug Hutchinso� Tom Crewford Jodie Manale Chris Davis Mike Konefal Michael Staffopoulos Alexandra Rolandelli Creg Scoville Alejandro Vlarello Davfd Sollenberqer lejandro �larello Robert Jeffrey Charlie Attardo Steve Lindorf � _ —L--- -1_ -- . _ ' _- —�- 1--- - ----- _. ... . _ _ _ - ----1- —_ : _ _--- _ '-- -- -- Comparison of Florida CRA's - TIF Expenditures & Activities - - ----- r - -- -- -t-.- I. _- -- . _ - - � -- -- . . . � Land - --� - � -- � - � - -- � - . :� Development Debt Service on ' Acquisition S Publlc Parking i Fagade Relocation I Affortlable � Impact Fee Incentives TelephOne # Bonds '��, Assembly Garages 8 Lots Streetscapes �mprovements Costs � Housing ��, Abatement (Define) __ _ � - -- {- _ _.. - ----- - . . _ ___. _. _ _- -�--� - -J___ _ _ (863) 965-5530 No i Yes Yes Yes �_ Yes No No Yes Yes .. .-..— . _ . .- --- - (863)452-4403 _No ' No No No �_ Yes No I No . No No --�-- - - -- - -�. _._. _ . . .-- (863) 534-0'100 Yes ��, Yes Na Yes �. No No � Yes '- No No . _--- - --- . . _..__ (321) 952-3413 No � Yes No � Yes �� Yes No � No No Yes --- ---� � - `---- ------_._r__ -..-.. <..____. (850) 674-5488 No No No No j No No i No No No (561j 367-7070 Yes Yes Yes Yes _� No Yes No Yes No (239) 549-5615 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes � No Yes Yes (850) 697-2727 No � No No Yes No No No No No — - .___ ... .-.-- - - ----- � � - - (407) 262-7700 No � Yes No Yes Yes Yes No � No Yes (353) 543-5732 Yes '� Yes Yes Yes No No No No No -- -. _. . . . .. .-� ----- - - � - � - (727) 298-3199 No ,__ No No Yes � No No No No No (386) 248-9425 No i No No Yes Yes No No No Yes -----. _. ;- ---_._ . .. _- (941) 723-4570 No � Yes No Yes Yes No Yes � No Yes ._ .. .,----- --'— -- - - ;.._. (850) 435-1695 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No . . --� - �.----- - - ... ., .__ (954) 797-2622 Yes � No Yes Yes No No No � No No — ��--- r--- - --- �- ��-- (941) 575-3302 Yes Yes No Yes _ Yes Yes No ! Yes Yea (941) 954-4169 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes (850) 889-2067 __No _. j No No Yes No No Yes . No No (813�274-8795 Yes ^ No No Yes No No No No No — -------- �- ---..._ �,..._ (863) 2915600 Yes { Yes No Yes Yes No No No No -- -- -- --- .. ..__.. .._.. (561) 737-3256 No I No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes — --___.. i--- --- � -'- - (904) 823-2507 Yes Ves Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes (850)595-3216 ,No �'_ Yes No Yes No No No ��.�, No No (941) 473-9795 No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No — - -- - (727) 893-1000 No ' No No No Yes No No No No (727) 586-7490 No _ j-_Yes No No No No No . No No �305)673-7193 No j Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes (813) 749-1103 _No __� No No Yes No No No ! No No _ (305) 416-1800 Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No (813) 659-4200 Yes i Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No (727)724-1555 No No No Yes Yes No No No No (305) 416-1800 Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes j No No (T27) 551-3254 Ves Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes (727)942-5638 Yes No No No No No No No No (904) 247-6231 Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes (727) 541-0751 No Yes No No No No No � No No (352�Sq4-5430 No No No Yes No No No � No No CRA Activities Slatewide.xls �� Planning-Surve� Cash Grantsi Admin. Costs Consultants No----.�__ _ No No : _ No No Yes No Yes No _ _ I_ -No No No Yes L Yes No I No No ' No No.__._i__ Yes No I No i- - No No Yes j Yes No No No r Yes Yes � _ No No �I No No _� Yes No _� Yes No I Yes No � Yes No r Yes No i Yes -�- No _ i Yes No t� No No I No No I Yes No t No No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No � '�. Environmental Testing - Demolition j Cleanup ' ---- Yes ; Yes _. N° � ...._No - Yes No No ; --.......Yes No �� ._.._ No __ Yes No No � No _. . ..------ No No Yes � Yes --_ -__.__t _----- No No __ No_ �. .--- No No � No __- Yes � Yes - . . . --� ----- . � Yes Yes - - � --}----...- No I No - - -+ --- Yes No - , _. Yes Yes _Yes -�----NO � No � No --rt--- ---Yes --.�. --..._No Yes � Yes ---._.+. . - Yes Yes N� Yes j__ _. No � Yes ---} - No ',� No Yes i _ Yes No I Yes No _ No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes � No No No Yes Yes No •No No Nn Utili Communft �Y Y Infrastructures Policing Other Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No v.� No _ __ N� No _ No _ No _ No -- Ves _ No No Yes No _ Yes Yes - Yes No _ No No No No No _ Yes Yes _ Yes __ No _ No _ No __ No _ No _ No No No No No No Yes No !dc None None Yes None None None None None None Yes Yes None Yes Yes None None None None None None Yes None Yes None None No�e None None None None Yes None None None Yes !io Date: November 3, 2003 Department M Ecorwmic Devalopment and Housing