Loading...
FLD2012-11023 (RELATED TO DVA2012-11001) . � � a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD } l��r����r � � PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT �' STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: .tanuary 15, 2012 AGENDA ITEM: D.2. CASE: FLD2012-11023 (Related to DVA2012-11001) REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit a 91-room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist(T) District with a lot area of 27,446 square feet (0.63 acres), a lot width of 83.97 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard, front (north) setbacks of zero feet (to existing brick pavers), 0.8 feet (to existing covered wood deck), 8.1 feet (to proposed structure), and 19.7 feet (to existing building); side (east) setbacks of zero feet (to existing wood frame structure), 6.5 feet(to structure), and 10 feet(to existing building); side (west)setbacks of zero feet(to proposed canopy), four feet (to existing pavement), and 5.6 feet (to existing structure); rear (south) setbacks of zero feet (to existing brick paver pool deck), 14 feet(to cover wood structure), and 26.6 feet(to existing building}; a building height of 49_5 feet (from Base Flood Elevation to top of roo�; and five off- street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2-803.D; and an increase in the maximum allowable density through the allocation of 60 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design; as well as a reduction to the required foundation landscaping width along South Gulfview Boulevard from five feet to zero feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G. GENERAL DATA: Agent........................... Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (Housh Ghovee and Renee Ruggiero) AppliCant/Owner.............. Clearwater Grande Development, LLC LoCation........................... 655 South Gulfview Boulevard; located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard, approximately 894 feet west of Gulf Boulevard Property Size.................... 0.63 Acres Future Land Use Plan...... Resort Facilities High(RFH) Zoning.......................... Tourist(T)District Specia/Area Plan.............. Beach by Design(Clearwater Pass District) Adjacent Zoning... North: Tourist(T)District South: Open Space/Recreation(OSlR)District East_ Tourist(T)District West: Tourist(T)District Existing Land Use............. Overnight Accommodations Proposed Land Use......... Overnight Accommodations ��f�� �p, # � � �� ■ �s • . . . � �' � �,.t , ��w ; ��- - �� n,,. � „�� * . .�"` �5fi: � ���° ,_.• , „� _ ,,,�� ``� ��; . ' �. -� �°'� '" '� . � � � �.,, $° _ti �� � , `. ,w,:. , • ; . , _ ,� �.; .,;; �. , ; .� ;,;„ �� < � F ,.. , "'�'• -� � ♦ w � _ ;.� .� •�� "° � . �� � ' - � ._ , ,, �� ... � .. k I�� � �I� I." .. b � _ a '�3�.., .,.� .. �`. : . , .s;, '� ..' > fJ��' ` �F'� �•� � � � � *'�e�a ::. �'�+_.w,�`�.rv 2 +� ... I , * ��, ��.�:. �! � "�it � "� -,:��iYik D.�. , ° p�1�T�1+pr PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT � C�l.[tl !'r[all,l Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOPIv1ENT REYIEW DIVISION � �u.. ANALYSIS: � �—_—�- Site Location and Existing Conditions: � �� � sr$ � � The 1.438 acre subject property is located on ' � _ the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard I 1 � e^'�r w��A �—��. approximately 894 feet west of Gulf Boulevard. � °�� o��_—�='� I, ' \ �� �„s,oE—� The subject property is currently developed � `� ��� � , �, with a 91-room hotel (Quality Inn) and its � � ��;�( � � associated parking lot. The existing building is �I ��� located on the east side of the site and oriented I �.'/e \\\\�" � _ north/south. `��L�,�� \ �`�"��C� �-- �, e,. -- �� _ . Retail Sales and services uses are located to the �\� p north of the subject property. The adjacent � �� \PRS/TECT �SS property to the west consists of the Econo � / Lodge hotel. The adjacent parcel to the east LOCATION MAP consists of the Continental Towers condominium property. The land area to the south consists of a beach that overlooks Clearwater Pass. i Development Proposal: i� P C<FA/p�qTFR ' # The sub ject pro pert y consists of a existin g 91- I y room hotel (Quality Inn) and its associated �, � � g � ARe�R � parking lot on 62,620 square feet of lot area a s°�� 9 g od��� � _ (1.43 acres). The owners of the property � �`"a<,., �� , ,��� �Bq?ao�,,��3 propose to complete a minor lot ad justment j - � ° �""`B<�o ' ""� separating the hotel building from its parking �I T ,._ 3�_���._ ` ; lot to create two lots of record to allow for the ; �''•�.,,s �II g , a� `�e d e v e l o p m e n t o f a n e w m i d-p r i c e d h o t e l �' , `� d ��' . (Hampton Inn & Suites on Parcel B; see � ;' ; b � Agenda Item D3). The existing Quality Inn = hotel will then be situated on a parcel of land � (Parcel A) with a lot width of 83.97 feet (along � P �cFqR South Gulfview Boulevard) and 27,446 square ZONING MAP feet in lot area(0.63 acres). The existing Quality Inn has 91 hotel rooms that were approved in the late 1970's. The proposal is to bring the density of the existing hotel to conform to current Code provisions through the Hotel Density Reserve. Based on current Code provisions which allow fifty hotel units per acre, ninety-one hotel rooms on the subject parcel exceed the number of allowable hotel rooms on a lot with 62,620 square feet; only seventy-one hotel rooms are permitted on the subject parcel. The existing use on site is nonconforming in regards to allowable number of hotel units per acre. After the proposed minor lot adjustment,the nonconformity will increase. As noted above, the owners propose to reduce the acreage of the Quality Inn parcel to 0.63 acres (Parcel A). That amount of land area allows for a maximum of 31 hotel rooms based on maximum density standards. However, Beach by Design allows for a maximum of 100 hundred Community Development Board—January 15,2013 FLD2012-11023 —Pa�e 1 � Clearwater Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION - ��,�_. hotel rooms to be allocated through the Hotel � Density Reserve to any development with a lot , �� `FARWArFR ' ` size o f less t han 2.5 acres. For t his reason t he � ��� --' y'QReoR owners of the Quality Inn hotel are proposing a • �-— ���� , = `�� , _� �—-, 91-unit overnight accommodation use at a density Automobile Smim Statiou 1' � �?L�� �._„__._ ' of 144.44 units per acre, which includes the ,�= , ' ;, �, � r�„ - BA N s �• � �-.,Y � ���=a� � allocation of 60 units from the Hotel Density ; ; ; < <''�;r ,;� ��-B<� � _ Reserve under Beach by Design. ° � : ,� � Retail Sales and Sm�ce ';• �„��;'s� � ` - ,° ; �c � Hotd +`�y.� � ���� Hotel ' r R",�?i. � , � � 17 `` \�-C.`�'i '� �e � , i Also on this CDB agenda is a companion .o ;° � �����Fy A�,e�58���d S�;re Development Agreement (DVA2013-11001) that Hote� A11eC� ���, . p t=-,- � � , i„ aaeWngs ��; ' —�.._L°�wu must be approved by City Council, which � — „o,�, Vacam y provides for the allocation of the 60 units from ",�°;. ;� the Hotel Density Reserve. � , ' c�F In regards to off-street parking spaces, the EXISTING SURROUNDING USES existing Quality Inn and proposed Hampton Inn & Suites will share 252 off-street parking spaces through a shared parking and access agreement. The first five levels of the Hampton Inn building will be a parking garage. Guests of both hotels will access the parking garage from South Gulfview Boulevard through a shared driveway to the garage entrance. The ground level will have eight designated check-in parking spaces. A ground floor elevator lobby in the parking garage will take Hampton Inn guests to the main lobby. Quality Inn guests will exit the parking garage and walk under a new covered pedestrian walkway across the shared driveway to its main lobby. The applicant's representatives have stated that the developer plans to obtain temporary parking locations and a valet service for Quality Inn guests durin�the construction of the Hampton Inn. The applicant will remove the existing canopy to add a new canopy that will cover the walkway between the Hampton Inn property and Quality Inn property. Other proposed changes to the hotel include adding architectural elements such as architectural trim banding and bahama shutters to the fa�ades. They will also paint the exterior of the building using colors that support the coastal vernacular theme as set forth in the Beach by Design Guidelines. The primary color of the building will be a light beige (ambitious amber) with a white (modern white) accent color. The new canopy roof will be standing seam metal material teal green in color. The blue roof color of the IHOP restaurant will remain the same. Densitv: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation units per acre. Based on the proposed minor lot adjustment the Quality Inn property will have 27,446 square feet of land area (0.63 acres) zoned Tourist District; a maximum of 31 overnight accommodation units are permissible under current regulations. The applicants are requesting 60 hotel rooms from the Hotel Density Reserve, adopted as an amendment to Beach by Design under Ordinance 7925-08. The overall density for this project is 144.44 overnight accommodation units/rooms per acre, which is below the maximum of 150 units per acre established in Beach by Design for projects that have acquired units from the Hotel Density Reserve. Community Development Board—January l 5,2013 FLD2012-1 1023—Pa�e 2 � C1L�1 1`��ll.�Level II Ftexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNMG&DEVELOPIvIENT P Pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION - �:� Impervious Surface Ratio �SR� Pursuant to CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The proposed I.S.R. is 0.93,which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there are no minimum lot area and lot width for Comprehensive Redeveiopment Infill Projects; however, for comparison purposes the minimum lot area for overnight accommodations can range between 10,000 — 20,000 square feet. The proposed Quality Inn property will consist of 27,446 square feet of lot area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for overnight accommodations can range between 100 — 150 feet. The proposed minor lot adjustment will create a parcel with a lot width of 83.97 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard. Staff supports the proposed lot width. The minor lot adjustment will allow for the Hampton Inn & Suites property to be built. The redevelopment project will result in a total of 252 off-street parking spaces available for two mid-priced hotels on Clearwater Beach that comply with the standard development requirements for the number of parking spaces (1.2 spaces per unit) for each hotel. The main structures of the hotels will be separated by a distance of 28 feet. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there are no minimum front, side, and rear setbacks for Comprehensive Redevelopment Infill Projects; however, for comparison purposes the minimum front setback for overnight accommodations can range between 0 — 15 feet, the minimum side setback can range between 0 — 10 feet, and the minimum rear setback can range between 0 - 20 feet. The development proposal includes front (north) setbacks of zero feet (to existing brick pavers), 0.8 feet(to existing covered wood deck), 8.1 feet (to proposed pavement), and 19.7 feet (to existing building); side (east) setbacks of zero feet (to existing wood frame structure), 6.5 feet (to pool deck), and 10 feet (to existin� buildin�); side (west) setbacks of zero feet (to proposed canopy), four feet (to existing pavement), and 5.6 feet (to existing structure); rear (south) setbacks of zero feet (to existing brick paver pool deck), 14 feet (to cover wood structure), and 26.6 feet(to existing building). The requested setbacks will facilitate a new parking garage as a part of the redevelopment on the adjacent parcel which will improve the existing parking conditions for the hotel. The existing Quality Inn hotel will share a total of 252 off-street parking spaces with the new hotel on Parcel B. The overall project will result in a total of 207 mid-priced hotel rooms on the beach with on- site parking that is in compliance with Code provisions. For this reason, Staff supports the requested reductions to setbacks. Maximum Buildin� Hei h�t�. Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum height requirement for Comprehensive Redevelopment Infill Project; however, for comparison purposes, Beach by Design restricts the height of overnight accommodations prescribed by its respective zoning district which in the T District allows a height for overnight accommodation to range between 35 — 100 feet. There are no proposed changes to the height of the hotel through this application. The existing building is 49.5 feet in height from Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the top of roof, which is below the Code maximum. Community Development Board—January 15,2013 FLD2012-1 I 023—Pa�e 3 '� U�l���1��Ll,l Level II Flexibie Develo ment A lication Review PLrWNING 8c DEVELOPMENT P pP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION J ...'d'=:�..�` .' ... Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum required parking for overnight accommodations is 1.2 parking spaces per unit, or a minimutn of 109 parking spaces for the Quality Inn hotel with 91 hotel rooms. The minor lot adjustment and proposed redevelopment project will result in only five surface parking spaces on the subject property. However, the minor lot adjustment will create an adjoining parcel allowing for the development of a fifteen story Hampton Inn& Suites. The first five levels of the Hampton Inn & Suites will consist of a 245 space parking garage with an additional two surface parking spaces while the Quality Inn site will have five surface parking spaces for a total number of 252 off-street parking spaces for both properties. The hotels will share these spaces through a shared parking and access agreement. Located within the hotel is a 3,534 restaurant (IHOP) which includes an outdoor seating area that is for the use of hotel guests as well as tourists and beach goers. The square footage of the restaurant is less than 15 percent of the overall gross floor area of the hotel; therefore, as set forth in CDC Section 2-803.I.11, no additional parking spaces are necessary. The number of parking spaces required by the requested number of hotel rooms for the overall project is 248 parking spaces at 1.2 parking spaces per room. The number of parking spaces provided for both hotels exceeds the minimum number of spaces required by Code. The project will result in a total of 207 mid-priced hotel rooms on the beach with on-site parking that is in compliance with Code provisions. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of Occupancy, the owners shall submit evidence of a recorded shared parking, pedestrian, and access agreement between the Hampton Inn & Suites and Quality Inn properties. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. No new mechanical equipment is shown on the plans; however, if additional equipment is added later, it will be reviewed at the time of submission for a building permit. The existing location and screening of inechanical equipment complies with this Code provision. Si�ht Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the driveways on, and the street intersection of South Gulfview Boulevard, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. Some existing landscaping has been within the sight visibility triangle. These encroachments have been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable, given the circumstances of this site. Shrubbery planted within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements which specifies that landscaping will not obstruct views between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Any changes to the electric and communication lines for this hotel will be installed underground on-site in compliance with this requirement. The proposal complies with this Code provision. Community llevelopment Board—January l 5, 2013 FLD2012-I 1023—Page 4 , � ��L�1 ►1�ll.l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DNIS(ON x�:�.- _� _. Landscapin�: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this overall site; however, pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.2, foundation plantings shall be provided for 100 percent of a building facade with frontage along a street right-of-way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress, within a minimum five- foot wide landscaped area. The applicant requested a reduction to the foundation planting through a Comprehensive Landscape program. The existing landscape foundation strip varies in width from five foot wide to zero feet (0.8 inches) wide. The existing plantings are mature and consist of queen palm trees, royal palm trees, and white fountain grasses. Staff believes the existing foundation plantings are acceptable; however, the applicant shall restore andlor replace any unhealthy or dead landscaping found within landscape strip with Florida Grade #1 plant material. Solid Waste: The Quality Inn will utilize the trash room located on the first level of the Hampton Inn & Suites parking garage. The trash room will be equipped with a garage door that will allow Solid Waste access from South Gulfview Boulevard. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si��e�. There is no sign request a part of this application; however, any future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish and must be submitted to and approved by Staff. Additional Beach bv Design Guidelines: Beach by Design anticipates that properties located in the Clearwater Pass District will renovate and revitalize in response to improving conditions on Clearwater Beach. This renovation of the existing hotel and reconfiguration of the site is such a proposal. The proposed changes to the subject property will remain consistent with surrounding development in this character district. Section L.1 requires finish materials and building colors to reflect Florida or coastal vernacular themes. The applicants propose to repaint the fa�ade of the entire hotel to blend and be compatible with the proposed Hampton Inn & Suites hotel. The colors of the building support the coastal vernacular theme as set forth in the Beach by Design Guidelines. The primary color of the building will be a light beige (Ambitious Amber) with a white (Modern White) accent color. The various hotel roofs and canopy roof will be standing seam metal material teal green in color. The blue roof color of the IHOP restaurant will remain the same. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subj ect property. Community Development Board—January 15,2013 I'LD2012-11023—Pa�e 5 ' � C�l.[�l ���Ll.t Level II Flexible Develo ment A licatlon Review pLnrr�v�rrG&nEVeLOrMENr P Pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION . . . .fi;a........ ..... . � COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Section 2-801.1 and Table 2-803 and beach by Design: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 50 units/rooms per acre 91 units/rooms(144.44 units room X (max.of 40 per acre:requesting 60 rooms units/rooms) through Beach by Design Hotel Density Reserve) Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.93 X Minimum Lot Area N/A 26,447 sq.ft. X Minimum Lot Width N/A 83.97 feet(along S.Gulfview) X Minimum Setbacks Front:N/A North: zero feet(to pavers) X 0.8 feet(deck) 8.1 feet(to structure) 19.7 feet(to building) Side: N/A West: zero feet(to wood X structure) 6.5 feet(to structure) 8 feet(to building) East: Zero feet(to pavement X and pianters) 13.4 feet(to building) Rear: N/A South: Zero feet(to pavement X planters) 2.9 feet(to pool deck) 14.6 feet(to pool) 20.6 feet(to building) Maximum Height 150 feet from BFE 49.5 feet(from BFE) X iiiivu�,ii p�uCii vj' Design Minimum Off-Street Parking N/A 5 parking spaces X� 1 -See discussion under Minimum Off-Street Parking section. Community Development Board—January 15,2013 F�LD2012-1 1023—Page 6 • � CiL[tl 1t�Ll.l Level II F�exible Devel ment A lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT OP PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION u "zr"s.;s°. . � COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use chazacteristics of the neighborhood;and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an azea that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan arnendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The oroposed use nrovides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regazd to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive,visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.; ❑ Variety in materials,colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building step backs;and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landsca e desi n and a ro riate distances between buildin s. Community Development Board—lanuary I 5,2013 FLD2012-1 1023 —Pa�e 7 • • ° (�ip �] pf� PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT : lill.��t��l,l Level II F�exible Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914: Consistent Inconsistent l. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adj acent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual,acoustic and olfacto and hours of o eration im acts on ad�acent ro erties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of December 6, 2012, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent i_ �_ _ r_i i_ • r i• r r_ eviuence io suppori ine ic.�iie.�wing iinuings oi iaci: 1. The 1.438 acre subject property is located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 894 feet west of Gulf Boulevard; 2. The subject property is currently developed with a 91-room hotel (Quality Inn) and its associated parking lot; 3. That the subject property is located in the Tourist (T) District and the Resort High Facilities (RFH) future land use plan category; 4. That the subject property is located in the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design and is subject to all applicable requirements set forth therein; 5. The owners of the property propose to complete a minor lot adjustment separating the Quality Inn hotel building from its parking lot to create two lots of record to allow for the development of a Hampton Inn& Suites hotel; 6. The proposed Quality Inn parcel will have a lot width of 83.97 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard and a lot area of 26,447 square feet; 7. The proposal is to bring the density of the existing hotel to conform with current Code provisions through the Hotel Density Reserve; 8. The applicant proposes a mid-priced 91-unit overnight accommodation use at a density of 144.44 units/acre, which includes the allocation of 60 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design; Community Development Board—January 15,2013 FLD2012-1 1023—Page 8 ' � ���(1�1 ►��ll.l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review e�nrm�G&nEVaLOrMENr P PP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION 9. A companion Development Agreement (DVA2012-11001) that must be approved by City Council is also on this CDB agenda is, providing for the allocation of the 60 units from the Hotel Density Reserve; 10. The existing height of hotel is 49.5 feet from the Base Flood Elevation(BFE); 11. That the subject property will have five off-street parking spaces; 12. That the subject property will share a total of 252 off-street parking spaces and driveway access with the proposed Hampton Inn& Suites property; 13. That the request includes reductions to the front (north) setbacks of zero feet (to existing brick pavers), 0.8 feet (to existing covered wood deck), 8.1 feet (to proposed structure), and 19.7 feet (to existing building); side (east) setbacks of zero feet (to existing wood frame structure), 6.5 feet (to structure), and 10 feet (to existing building); side (west) setbacks of zero feet (to proposed canopy), four feet (to existing pavement), and 5.6 feet (to existing structure); rear (south) setbacks of zero feet (to existing brick paver pool deck), 14 feet (to cover wood structure), and 26.6 feet(to existing building) 14. That the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The proposed I.S.R. is 0.93; 15. That the request includes a reduction to the required foundation landscaping width along South Gulfview Boulevard from five feet to zero feet(0.8 inches); 16. There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Community Development Code Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Community Develonment Code Section 2-803_C_ . . 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3-914.A; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program as per Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Clearwater Pass character district of Beach by Design•, and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit (1) a 91-room overnight accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 27,446 square feet (0.63 acres), a lot width of 83.97 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard, front (north) setbacks of zero feet (to existing brick pavers), 0.8 feet (to existing covered wood deck), 8.1 feet (to proposed structure), and 19.7 feet (to existing building); side (east) setbacks of zero feet(to existing wood frame structure), 6.5 feet (to structure), and 10 feet (to existing building); side (west) setbacks of zero feet (to proposed canopy), four feet (to existing pavement), and 5.6 feet (to existing structure); rear (south) setbacks of zero feet (to existing brick paver pool deck), 14 feet (to cover wood structure), and 26.6 feet (to existing building); a building height of 49.5 feet (from base Flood Elevation to top of roo fl; and five off-street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infili Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-803.D; and (2) Increase in the Cornmunity Development Board-January 15,2013 PLD2012-11023 -Pa�e 9 I • � Cll.ul Yl�i.l.�Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review pL^rrr���&DEV�LOrMExr p PP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION - �.�rx permitted density by the allocation of 60 overnight accommodation units from the Hotel Density Reserve created pursuant to Beach by Design as well as a reduction to the required foundation landscaping width along South Gulfview Boulevard from five feet to zero feet as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of the Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G., subject to the following conditions of approval: Conditions of A�proval: l. That approval of this Flexible Development application is subject to the approval of a Development Agreement with the City (Case DVA2012-11001); 2. That prior to the issuance of any permit, a minor lot adjustment shall be recorded and submitted consistent with the site plans approved by the Community Development Board; 3. That a demolition permit be obtained for the removal of any structures part of the Quality Inn redevelopment proposal; 4. That no permits be issued for the Quality Inn property until appropriate cross access and shared parking agreements serving the Hampton Inn & Suites property and the Quality Inn property(FLD2012-11024/DVA2012-11002) are recorded in the public records; 5. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, cross easements for drainage, fire systems, maintenance etc. be recorded in the public records; 6. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 7. That any future freestanding signage must be monument-style meeting Code requirements and be designed to match exterior materials and color of the building. Any proposed signage for the hotel shall be reviewed and approved by Staff through a separate sign permit; 8. That the books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm comnliance with the Hotel Densitv Reserve criteria of Beach bv Desien as allowed bv generallaw; + , v + 9. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a hurricane evacuation plan for the Quality Inn hotel be submitted and approved by the City for all Guests; 10. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be painted the same color as the portion of the building to which such features are attached; 11. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all requirements of General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering, and the Fire Department be addressed; 12. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity; 13. That prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all utilities, including any individual distribution lines serving this development within the right-of-way along the east side of South Gulfview Boulevard must be installed underground. Community Development Board—January 15, 2013 FLD2012-1]023—Pa�e 10 , Y Cl���!'t�Ll.l Level II F�exible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT p pp DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVIS[ON " ��-,:. � Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Kevin W. Nurnberger, Planner III ATTACHMENTS:Photographs of Site and Vicinity Coinmunity Development Board—January l 5,2013 FLD2012-11023—Pa�e 1 1 r Kevin W.Nurnberger 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater,FL 33756 727-�62-4567ext2502 kevin.nurnberger r.(�,mYClearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Planner III March 2011 to present Planner II October 2010 to March 2011 City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports,and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. Planner County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009 Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents, neighborhood organizations, contractors, and developers regarding future projects which included state and local government agencies. Site Assistant Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007 Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage. Development Planner Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006 Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations, the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Virginia Department of Transportation plan, and Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties. City Planner City Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to 2005 Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the City Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustments. EDUCATION University of New Orleans,LA MA Urban and Regional Planning(2004) State University of New York at Buffalo,NY BA Anthropology(1999) . . � .� ,� � I ^� ,; '� , ; : . . '� { .y ,..� �"'� } '' � '!�'4y+ �;�N 1►' � „ ��� �� ��� .... . �. y., � � : :r. r� — ��N i�F'i �_� '' :t. � �'F`• .� y /-i..�-�ii�� . .T`- ^^'. � �,t,• � .a � , ` . \� S I Fr. I �A Looking southcast at Oualit� Inn tcom S.Gull���ie��. Lookin�� ��est at subjcct propert��along S.Gulfview. .� �v �_ � / ��� � 11',.��\' .. _ r, ,. ... `r.. ��� , ��� - �""`�%�= v• - '� .. . � �.;,; '� � ' ��.•. �^ � -- `� /r'. •� ,;;. .:5 +,, � ?',' ��, � '�k � ;��� � ;�:.. .�.; w �t , o ' ', � 1 t � � , a 9.r � '� s" — • �,. � � ., _} � . , �..,a,( _ � �'f .._. r �, ' — _ �, - - -- ; � — r — ,.,_ •;••,ti�;g��, „� n�r ' � � i�, �i�, _- -----___—_—-_- ,."; — Louking cast from rcar of subject property�. Looking north across South Gulfview from subject property. K�''��.,�� f , �`�µ � � �� � 1 1 �Jr,� ul.'�• �`) ! F " 'F ~� �r-, r� - i ��, • ` ka i �� ,- 'L� � i��a � _ _ _ � _ .� � •---�� �` _ e^ �..-.., e�e` . - , _ "a ..�; ._ _ . - _ o'�'. �r� �_ ._-, . � . _ � . r 1 �� .,+.�.. �xx: _ � �� �� Looking west along South Gulfview from subject Looking east along S.Gulfvie�v irom subject property proper[y.. 655 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2012-11023 � Civil Land Planning Due Diligence Reports � y� Re-Zaning,Land Use,Annexation ;;cZ�G�t����:!'� .3YJtf.<GC'+L's� ��LG. Stormwater Management Utility Uesign Traffic Construction Aciministration December 12`h, 2012 City of Clearwater Planning & Development Review Department Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: FLD2012-11023 and DVA2012-11001 655 S. Gulfview Blvd. - Quality Inn -Parcel A NES #1228 Dear Mr. Nurnberger, Below please find our responses to the DRC comments associated with the above referenced project: FLD2012-11023 � Engineerin� Review Prior to Community Development Board: 1. Acknowledged. See note on C4.1 Prior to Building Construction Permit: 1. Acknowledged. Any sidewalks or sidewalk ramps adjacent to or part of the project will be brought up to standard, if required. General Note: � � 1. Acknowledged. Environmental Review General Note(s): l. Acknowledged. Fire Review 1. Acknowledged. EYisting 91-imit hatel, proposed 91-unit hotel. No interior changes proposed. (Developer had proposed converting 3 offices back into hotel rooms but this is no longer a part of the project.} 30Q �o�.atl�i 3elchr>r S�nad �I+�ar�r�;�t�r.(=1<>rida 331b5 t��Ch;;`lt'i�7r rl��id� ,�rr�ii3.:�rin�s i ��.�:,.cr,i��2 `l27 h43 ?�3`v9 f=ax 7�7 �4•i6 8Q�.3�G 2. Acknowledged. Land Resource Review 1. Acknowledged. 2. All trees to be removed are delineated on demo plan, the project landscape design will contact the Land Resource Specialist to discuss the project as per our discussion at DRC. Parks and Recreation Review l. Acknowledged. 91 hotel units existing, 91 hotel units proposed. Planning Review General Comments: 1. Acknowledged. See revised site data table. Existing 91-unit hotel, proposed 91-unit hotel. (Developer had proposed converting 3 offices back into hotel rooms but this is no longer a part of the project.) 2. See site revised date table. 3. See revised cover sheet; providing 80 existing parking spaces. 4. ARCHITECT RESPONSE — Total Garage parking: 245 + 7 surface parking = 252 Total available parking spaces. The surface and garage parking were numbered separately. 5. Developer to lease temporary parking from surrounding sites with valet services while the Hampton is under construction. 6. A plan of the project has been sent to Progress Energy (formerly Florida Power Corporation) for review and comment (please see provide correspondence). Approval has not yet been received, it is understood that approval to construct within their easement is required with approval provided prior to permitting. 7. The surface parking spaces closest to Gulfview Blvd. have been designed to provide the appropriate amount of backup space to allow the vehicles to backup and exit the site. The surface spaces more to the south or internal to the site will exit through the garage. 8. Yes, the design provides the necessary backup room for turning radius. 9. Please see reviscd plans providing the 20'x 2�' site visibility triangles as per your request. Distinctive pavers have been provided within the crosswalk, with pedestrian crossing signage for drivers at the exit of the garage and site. 2 10. ARCHITECT RESPONSE - The canopy cannot attach to both buildings when it crosses over the new property line. It will attach to the Quality Inn and not to the Hampton Inn. 11. ARCHITECT RESPONSE - Canopy shall be constructed of a painted steel structure/truss system with a metal roof to match that of the Hampton Inn. The Quality Inn's exterior fa�ade is being brought up to date to compliment that of the Hampton Inn. 12. Acknowledged. Please see revised sheet C3.1 13. Please see additional discussion added to the Beach by Design Section of the Narrative. The existing IHOP restaurant occupies 7% of the GFA of the hotel and therefore is well within the allowable areas for accessory amenities. Comments to General Applicable Criteria: 14. Please see revised narrative, the assignment of units from the Hotel Reserve was at the suggestion of City Staff as a means to provide the City of Clearwater with additional mid-priced hotel room as desired by Beach by Design to aide in maintaining and increasing tourism within Clearwater. 15. No Comment 16. Please see revised Narrative. 17. No Comment 18. Please see revised Narrative 19. ARCHITECT RESPONSE — Sight lines from the existing Quality Inn were taken into account and helps shape the form of the Hampton Inn Parking Garage. Sight lines were preserved from the balconies to the beach. A conditioned space for the trash room will control the olfactory concerns and noise will be handled by the owner and his operation control. The proposed parking structure is appropriately shielded and blending with the hotel above, such that the exterior has the same architectural style, Einish and architectural decoration as the tower above so as not to stick out as a parking structure. Comments to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Elexibility Criteria: 20. No Comment 21. No Commeut 22. No Comment 23. No Comment � 3 24. No Comment 25. ARCHITECT RESPONSE—The existing metal roof over the lobby will be painted to match that of the Hampton Inn to help identify the two structures as an individual site. Color will be used to adhere to the Key West Coastal Design theme as well as breaking up the mass of the building. Colored building elevations with all improvements were waived. Massing, color and alignment of datum lines will be noteworthy elements within these designs. The design intent is that, while close in proximity, each building will still be seen as its own individual site only with the cross easement for the sharing of parking spaces. Comments on Beach by Design Criteria: 26. ARCHITECT RESPONSE —Will comply with colors/ materials/tri-colored canopies if applicable according to Beach by Design criteria. Through the use of color, patterns and alignments the Quality Inn will fit much better into the Beach by Design criteria. As it stands now it already features awnings which can be brought up to date along the front fa�ade, in addition to large portions of openness along the restaurant at the front fa�ade with windows. Along the front of the building the landscape and benches lend to a soft and inviting feel. Solid Waste Review l. ARCHITECT RESPONSE — The area has been increase from existing size and will be shared by Hampton Inn, Quality Inn, and Ihop. The trash from the Quality Inn will exit the Quality Inn from the door near the bar and will travel through the main entrance of the garage in low traffic times only to the trash room location. Stormwater Review General Notes: 1. Acknowledged. 2. Acknowledged. 3. Acknowledged. Traffic Engineering Review Cener�l I�Iote(s): l. Acknowledged. 2. Acknowledged. 4 DVA2012-ll001 Parks and Recreation Review 1. Acknowledged. 91 hotel units existing, 91 hotel units proposed. Plannin� Review l. The DVA has been revised to show 0.63 acres. 2. Acknowledged. Provided. 3. Acknowledged. Please see revised documentation; the building height is 49.5' above BFE Public Art Review 1. Acknowledged. We trust this information is sufficient to respond to the DRC comments and allow the project to move forward to the Community Development Board. Please feel free to contact us if you have questions or require additional information and we will respond immediately. Sincerely, Renee Ruggiero, Senior Project Planner Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 5 , �- � u�a � . - �r� o Planning& Development Department � � ea�Water Flexible Develo ment A lication p pp � Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY,AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AN� 14 C9PIES1. PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED,STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $1,205 PROPERTY OWNER(PER DEED): Clearwater Grande Development, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 20001 Gulf Blvd. Suite 5, Indian Shores, FL 33785-2417 PHONE NUMBER: 727-595-0366 EMAIL: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Housh Ghovaee, CEO and/or Renee Ruggiero Senior Project Planner MAILING ADDRESS: 300 S. Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL 33765 PHONE NUMBER: 727-235-8475 (Renee mobile) - 727-446,8036 (office) EMAIL: Renee@northsideengineering.net ADDRESS OF SUBIECT PROPERTY: 655 s. Gulfview Blvd. PARCEL NUMBER(S): 17-29-15-05004-003-0080, LEGAL DESCRIPT�ON: See Attached PROPOSED USE(S): 9; Unit Hotel DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Attached Narrative Specifically identify the request (include all requested code flexibility; e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height, setbacks, IoY size,lot width,specific use,etc.J: � Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567; Fax:727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01/12 , ` � ., �� �- ��.�� , LL o Planning&Development Department } earwater Flexible Develo ment A lication � p pp � Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT; Tourist FUTURE LAND U5E PLAN DESIGNATION: Resort Facilities High EXISTING USE(currently existing on site): Existing Quality znn xotel (91 Units) PROPOSED USE(new use,if any;plus existing,if to remain): Existing Quality Inn Hotel (9# Units) SITE AREA: 27,446 sq.ft. o.63o acres GROSS FLOOR AREA(total squarefootage ofail buildings): please see attached Site Data Table Existing: sq.ft. Proposed: sq.ft. Maximum Allowable: sq.ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA(total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses): First use: sq.ft. Second use: sq.ft. Third use: sq.ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO(total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: Proposed: Maximum Ailowable: BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT(15t floor square footage of all buildings): Existing; sq.ft. ( %of site) � Proposed: sq.ft. ( %of site) Maximum Permitted: sq.ft. ( %of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA(green space within the parking lot and interior of site;not perimeter buffer): Existing: sq.ft. ( %of site) ' Proposed: sq.ft. ( %of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA(parking spaces,drive aisles, loading area): Existing: sq.ft. ( %of site) Proposed: sq.ft. ( %of site) , ��, `'� Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865 �; Page 2 of 8 Revised 01/12 � , � Z . 1 w.- v 1 r � ', �,t� "5;�:. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO(total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: �roposed: Maximum Perrrsitted: DENSITY(units, rooms or beas per acre): BUILDING HEIGHT: Existing: Existing: Proposed: Proposed: Maximum Perrniited: Maximum Permitted: OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: Proposed: Minimum Required: � � WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $ � 0��� �" ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY: North: Tourist South: os/R EaSt: Tourist WeSt: Tourist STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY aF PINELLAS � I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this �� day of representations made in this application are true and � /,�to me and/or by accurate o the best of my knowledge and authorize � �.,„,;,. City re resentatives to visit and photograph the ���W` �W ,who is personally known has pr 'per y described in this application. produced �� (�. . as identification. _ �,�.�:�.--_ � Signature of property owner or representative Notary public, ° My commission expires: �� � �� �p'(PNY AVB`i � F� "� * h1Y COM�p�p�949832 N P �XPIRES:May 3,pp14 l 9�OF F40RP Bonded 7hru gudget Nolary Services Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 3 of 8 Revised 01/12 . Q ✓ I t`"" l�t.� � , � �""��,.. LL o Planning&Development Department � � earwater Flexible Develo ment A lication p pp " General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX(6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL,THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attached Narrative 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the vaiue thereof. See Attached Narrative 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Attached Narrative 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Attached Narrative 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attached Narrative 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,on adjacent properties. See Attached Narrative � , ` `, Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567; Fax:727-562-4865 ' Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12 . � LETTER O F AUTH CI RlZATI O N This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee (afl�nt Name) with Northside Enqineerina Services. Inc. to act as an agent for Clearwater Grande Development, LLC (Property Ow�er's Name} And to execute any and aIC documents related to securing permits and approvals for the canstruction on the property generally located at 645 - 655 Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater FL 33767 (Property Lacation) PINELLAS County, State of FLORIDA. � _____.— — —__________-__----__. _.._.. C�� �._� _ -''"�-- �'`;���.�- �i���...,�'' `�, .r"��c'" Signature of Property Owner Print Name of Property Owner t���'x�l �rul��''�'�it� �.`7 l�l`�.-. Address of Property Owner `fitle � �`/�-��,� ,���f��s ��� ��:�?f'� '7�7 ���--/�,�:7 City/State/zip Cod'e Telephone Number State of f--�� .,_, The Foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this �`'��day i � � County of�1��-- of�.��-t..., 20,,,�-by_�,�„L��, as who is personally known to me nr who has produced____ as idenEification and who did(did nnt) lake an oath. ��<<�;�P�`,,,' JANEr L.KRUEQER Notary Pub1iC �'� �, Nof�ry Puhllc-81it� i �j } .•=My Camm.Explr�t Juh 2 , 16 �=;� �=' Commiselon A�EE ��"'/� G �°�%+°��t�`� BondM Thrauph NMk�ul�'o�j��. n# S'" • `�✓ 1��0 �rr.� (SEAL ABOVE) (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) .•1 C�:a.- _.� . � � � LEGAL DESCR/PTION LEGAL DESCR/PTION L OTS 8, 9, �0 & � �, BL OCK C, BA YSIDE SUBDIVISION NO. 5, AS RECORDED lN PLA T BOOK 38, PA GE 38, OF THE PUBL lC RECORDS � OF P/NELLAS COUNTY, FL�RIDA. TOGETHER VI/lTH ALL RIPARIAN RIGHTS APPERTAINING THERETO, lF ANY, PRO VIDED, HO INEVER, THA T NO FILL SHALL BE MADE BEYOND THE SEA VI/ALL L lNE ES TABL ISHED ON THE PLA T. CONTAINING 626�9. 83 SQ. FT. OR �.438 ACRES MORE OR LESS. , f �� : �L-.� LL ° C earwater Planning&Development Department � Comprehensive Landscaping Application IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY,AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON(NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PlANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS(1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES)AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD, IF NECESSARY, WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS(1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED,STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPIICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. PROPERTY OWNER(PER DEED): Clearwater Grande Development, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 20001 Gulf Blvd. STE 5, Indian Shores, FL 33785-2417 PHONE NUMBER: 72�-595-0366 EMAIL: stevepage@tampabay.rr.com Northside Engineering Services, Inc. AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: u,,,,�h rh,,,,app� CEO - Renee Ruc,�g�r_n, S n�or Pro�ect P�anner MAILING ADDRESS: 300 S. Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL 33765 PHONE NUMBER: Renee 727-235-8475 - Housh 727-709-0943 EMAIL: Renee@northsideengineering.net ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 655 s. Gulfview slvd. DESCRIPTION OFREQUEST: Request a reduction to the required foundation planting from 5' to 0.80' Specifically identify the request (include all requested code flexibility; e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot size,lot width,specific use,etc.J: STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS -� I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this �3 day of representations made in this application are true and ��� �t)�� .to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photo�raph the �US� ���Q� ,who is personally known has prop ty scribed in this application. a�`;�•P��% RAMA * MYCOMMISSIO�� �• � � as identification. EXPIRES:May 3,2014 + � �_. �9�oF Fl.�`P ihtu 8udpet Not�9 6ervicea �....... � . (��nA Y�.-"�'"�-'�- ���./ �r•�/- Si ature of property owner or representative Notary public, My commission expires: ,3 20� Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562�3567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 1 of 2 Revised 01112 ,.� LL o Planning&Development Department � � ear�vater Com rehensive Landsca in A lication p p g pp � Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE FIVE(5) FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL,THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING PROPOSAL. 1. Architectural Theme: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. The landscape design provides a tropical theme as appropriate for the Clearwater Beach community; the existing landscaping is full and presents layers of colors and textures. AND OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The project Landscape Designer has identified areas where new plantings can be placed or replaced if existing plantings are not healthy. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscaping program is automatically controiled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. Acknowledged 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. The landscaping provides aesthetically pleasing views and utilizes plant materials which are conducive to the Clearwater Beach Environment. 4. Property Values.The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The mature existing landscape together with the proposed improvements will have positive and beneficial impacts on the immediate vicinity 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The landscape design is tropical in theme as appropriate for the Clearwater Beach community the existing mature plantings present layers of color and texture. Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567; Fax:727-562-4865 Page 2 of 2 Revised 01/12 � Civil �and Planning D�ie Diligence Repores �_ �� � Re-Zoning,I.�ind Use,Annexatinn ;� ��t�Gt�t�'�J',G�� ��'�'t-G�� ��tC. Stormwat�r Management QUALITY INN HOTEL- EXISTING Utility Design Tra�c 655 - GULFVIEW BOULEVARD� CLEARWATER BEACH Construction Adminisu-ation Na�TIVE Description of Request The Applicant, Clearwater Grande Development, LLC. proposes a transfer of land from the existing Quality Inn site to a new proposed neighboring hotel while retaining the existing Quality Inn 91 units through receipt of 60 units from the Beac/t by Design Hotel Density Reserve. The subject property is proposed at an aggregate of 0.63 acres and is currently bounded by Clearwater Pass to the south, Gulfview Boulevard to the north, Econo Lodge hotel to the west and by the existing Continental Towers Condominium to the east. The site area of the Quality Inn currently utilized as a surface parking lot is area of the proposed new hotel with a structured parking garage below; the proposal contemplates a shared parking garage designed to serve both the existing Quality Inn and the new proposed Hampton Inn. Specifically, the Applicant requests flexible development approval to permit 91 overnight accommodation units in the Tourist District, which includes an increase in density of 60 overnight accommodation units from the Beach by Design Hotel Density Reserve, with a. a Lot Area of 0.63 acres (27,446 square feet); b. a Lot Width of 83.97 feet on Gulfview Boulevard; c. a maximum Building Height(above BFE) 49.5' d. a front (North) setback along Gulfview Boulevard of 19.7' to the building, 0.8' to the covered wood deck and 8.1' to parking lot pavement; e. a side (West) interior setback of 6' to the building, 5.6' to the covered wood deck, 0' to pavement and entrance canopy; f. a side (East) interior setback of 10' to the building, 0' to the wood deck and 6.5' to the pool pavers; g. a rear (South) waterfront setback of 26.6' to the building, 0' to the pool pavers, 14' to the covered patio; 0' to the stage and 15.8' to the pool; h. Providing 252 Parking Spaces through a shared garage; and i. a Twenty (20) Year Development Agreement :� as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- j 803.0 oF the Development Code �.vith a reduction to the landscape requirements through a r� Comprehensive Landscape Application to allow a reduetion to the foundation planting from 5' to 0.80'. Additionally, the Applicant request approval of a Development Agreement �vhich sets forth terms of use associated with the 60 rooms from the Beach by Design Hotel Density Reserve. 3�`0 So!ath �'�>IctS��r �2c�:�ii c.����,�v�,�r.��i;r=��,����ia .33�rr.�5 1 i,�cPi����7nc>rtii�icicc=n�;ir �riri;��.r��ir.r_s.r.urn 7"1�1 �1�13 2t369 Fax `727 �1��6 �3t)3G 1 Discussion The site is located within an area designated by 13each by Design as the "Clearwater Pass District " Beach by Design identifies this as a distinctive area, offering a diversity of uses including high rise condominiums, resort hotels, hotels, motels, retail and restaurant uses. Beach by Design contemplates that the "Clearwater Pass District" will be an area of strategic revitalization and renovation in the response to improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach. Beach by Design identifies a disparity between hotels and condominiums, and strongly encourages mid-priced hotel development. Beach by Design indicates Clearwater Beach can support an addition 1,385 hotel rooms and further provides increased densities through the Hotel Density Reserve to aide in achieving the additional mid-priced hotel units on Clearwater Beach. NOTE: Application(s), Site Plan and Narrative simultaneously submitted in association with the proposed Hampton Inn located at 635 - Gulfview Blvd. The parcels associated with both the Quality Inn and the proposed Hampton Inn are under the same ownership control. Proposed Use The existing Quality Inn with 91 (existing) and 91 (proposed) overnight accommodation units will continue to offer reasonable room rates, appropriate for mid-priced family vacations as it has since 1994. Twenty-seven percent (27%) the guests of the Quality Inn are return visitors. This proposal allows the Quality Inn to continue to operate as it has for many years with a new parking garage to service the guests. The site area of the Quality Inn currently utilized as a surface parking lot provides the area for the new proposed hotel with a structured parking garage below; the proposal contemplates a shared parking garage designed to serve both the existing Quality Inn and the new proposed Hampton Inn. General Applicability Criteria l. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony �vith the scale, bulk, coverage, density �nd character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The Quality Inn Hotel has been in existence for many years and is siinilar in bulk, scale and coverlge as the adjacent properties. The eYisting contemporary strticture is in keeping with the character of the adjacent properties and will continue to be an anchor for this area of the I3each. The proposed assignment of units from the density reserve �vill, in the end, result in additional mid-priced liotel units for Clearwater Beach. 2 I 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposal will not discourage appropriate development and use of the adjacent land and buildings, the area is already developed and the value of adjacent and surrounding properties will not be compromised. The development proposal will continue to enhance this area of the Beach in a number of ways, including: l. A nationally-recognized hotel chain which attracts guests who will become patrons of Beach restaurants, shops and tourist attractions, offering support to many local businesses. 2. The property value will significantly increase. 3. The existing architecture and proposed upgraded landscape design will continue to enhance the area. 4. Mid-priced hotel accommodations on Clearwater Beach with adequate parking meet a current need of the City. 5. The existing hotel will continue to contribute to the City's economic and job base. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the pro�osed use. The existing hotel development complies with applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code in association with existing structures. Through this development plan a single shared access point is proposed; the access point is existing and will serve both the existing Quality Inn and the proposed Hampton Inn and Suites. Improvements to safety of pedestrians, bicyclist and motorist is achieved through the deletion of the existing most western access point; this access point will be limited to the Sanitation Department vehicles for trash staging and pick up. The proposed parking structure is designed to accommodate hotel guests of both the existing Quality Inn and the proposed Hampton Inn and Suites including access ro the garage that is internal to the site. The project crosswalks provide decorative pavers as per Beach by Design requirements and the proposed stop signs include "Caution Pedestrian Crossing" language ro further insure safety. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 3 The proposed garage located below the proposed neighboring Hampton Inn provides parking which is primarily internal to the building, is appropriately screened and is architecturally integrated into the design of the building. Valet service is provided in addition to several surface "guest spaces" intended to allow short term (30 min) parking and designated "Check-In" spaces within the garage providing further mitigation of traffic related issues. Adequate access, signage and parking are provided within the design to insure smooth traffic flow at the entrance of the sites along Gulfview Boulevard. Traffic will not be negatively impacted by the proposal; it is anticipated that nearby intersections and adjacent roadways will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service after the proposed Hampton Inn with parking structure is completed. Please see formal Traftic Impact Study for additional information. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The area provides high rise condominium, hotel and resort developments in addition to some mid-rise and low-rise developments, all are of varying character, heights and uses. The existing hotel is consistent with the surrounding and nearby uses and the character of the community; the proposed division of land will result in an appropriately scaled developments for the Clearwater Pass District of Clearwater Beach similar to Sheppard's and will provide mid-price hotel units as desired by Beach by Design. The proposal utilizes the incentives intended to encourage mid-priced hotel development and to allow the economic feasibility of mid-priced hotels on Clearwater Beach through increased density and height. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and otfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent �roperties. The existing hotel development will continue to operate as in the past with the exception of the guest parking being provided within the adjacent parking structure. Improvements to the existing landscape design are proposed in addition to a reduction to vehicular access points from the Gulfview Blvd. The development plan includes shared facilities for sanitation staging and pick-up, parking and access. The proposed shared trash collection area located within the proposed neighboring Hampton Inn is screened and climate contro(led and will not negatively impact the passerby whether on a visual or olfactory basis. Adequate parking with parking control is provided and will minimize congestion. � COMPREHENS(VE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT-PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development stanc�ards. The proposed deviations from Code are necessary and the minimum required to maintain the existing Quality Inn and to accomplish the division of land to accommodate the new proposed neighboring mid-priced hotel utilizing the Hotel Density Reserve. Certain deviations are necessary to accommodate the restoration of mid-priced hotel rooms as desired and envisioned by Clearwater Ordinance No. 925-08 and to meet the Beach by Design guidelines. Setbacks Beach by Design encourages minimal setbacks to support a more pedestrian environment; the existing design offers reduced building setbacks along the street frontage with the remaining areas in-filled with mature tropical plantings adjacent to the right-of-way. The east side setbacks were established at the time of the original construction of the hotel and are similar to many other sites in the vicinity, and constructed in the same era. The proposed reduced setback between the two hotel sites is appropriate as the sites will share the parking garage structure, driveway and walkways within the internal east side yard. The proposal will further enhance and promote a pedestrian-friendly environment as desired by Beach by Design. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. The proposal will provide allow the continuance of a highly desired use which contributes to the city economy; overnight accommodation uses are allowed in the "Resort Facilities High" land use category and are consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive plan and Beach by Design. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Goals/Policies/Objectives include but are not limited to: A.6.6 Objective - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic sector. A.6.7 Objective - Redevelopment activities shall be sensitive to the city's waterfront and promote appropriate public access to the city's watertront resources. 5 The availability of affordable overnight accommodations is integral to the success of tourism, both locally to Clearwater Beach and the Community as a whole. The proposal to retain the existing waterfront hotel and allow the distribution of land needed to develop the new proposed Hampton Inn promotes tourism activities and enjoyment of our natural resources. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed development is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and 2 together with Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development. The proposed redevelopment project will benefit the community as a whole and this district. The proposed hotel may encourage additional investment and improvement to the surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of this proposal. The existing overnight accommodation use is an allowable use and is well established within the neighborhood and district. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor d. The proposed use provides for the provision of afforclable housing e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use ptan amendment and rezoning would result in spot land use or zoning designation; f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new ancl/or preservation of a working waterfront use The "Resort Facility High" land use category and the "Tourist" zoning district both permit overnight accommodation uses; the distriet allows overnight accommodation uses as a minimum standard and tleYible standard use. The eYisting mid-priced hotel is a significant economic contributor to the City, promoting tourism and generates jobs for the community. 6 � 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height, and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; Overnight accommodation uses are permitted in the Tourist (T) zoning district without special approval. As the surrounding properties are made up of overnight accommodations, high rise condominiums and various retail and restaurant establishments the existing hotel does not impede normal and orderly development and improvements of the surrounding properties as previously discussed within General Applicability Criteria 2. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; The Quality Inn is an eYisting contemporary structure with metal roofs similar to the proposed Hampton Inn. Through this development proposal, with the use of color on the roof and on the building mass, the existing structure will be nicely updated to compliment the Key West Coastal Design of the proposed neighboring Hampton Inn. Massing, color and alignment datum lines will be noteworthy elements within the design. The design intent is that, while close in proximity, both hotels will still be seen as its own individual site and identity; it is not intended that the two hotels look alike but compliment one another. Through this development proposal, with the creative use of paint bands and coordination alignments of the adjacent base colors and patterns the existing building mass will appear more broken up as desired by Beach by Design. Decorative shutters and new tri-colored canopies will be present to better meet the applicable design guidelines. The proposed landscape improvements will also help to unite the developments as a whole as the pedestrian level. The new pool deck and amenity area on grade on the Hampton side will also introduce rich landscaping which will further enhance some of the more plain walls of the Quality Inn near the south west end of the building complying with the intent of the Beach by Design Guidelines. Please see additional discussion under Section d. below. c. The design, scale, and intensity of the pro�osed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The emerging character of area is varying and transitional as ne�ver and older developments exist, tlle area primarily otfers overnight accommodation, condominiums and retail/sei�vice uses of similar scale and intensity. Please see additional discussion under General f�pp(icability Criteria 1. 7 i • d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantiai number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontai building planes • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,porticos,balconies, railings,awnings,etc. • Variety of materials and colors • Distinctive fenestration patterns • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roof forms Some of the above elements are present within the existing architectural design of the building. The Quality Inn is an existing contemporary structure with metal roofs similar to the proposed Hampton Inn. Through this development proposal, with the use of color on the roof and the building mass this building will be nicely updated to compliment the new Key West Coastal Design of the proposed neighboring Hampton Inn and Suites. Through the use of color, the building mass of the existing Quality Inn would appear more broken up with the creative use of paint bands and coordination alignments of the adjacent base colors and patterns. The proposed landscape improvements will also help to unite the developments as a whole as the pedestrian level. The new pool deck and amenity area on grade on the Hampton side will also introduce rich landscaping which will further enhance some of the more plain walls of the Quality Inn near the south west end of the building. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhances landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The proposed/eYisting buffers and setbacks provide appropriate buffers and distances between buildings; the development provides a shared parking structure with access which is internal to the site. The landscape design presents an inviting tropical appearance and meets the intent of Beach by Design. Beach bv Desi�n The existing 91 unit hotel, with 60 units trom the Beuch Uy Design Hotel Density Reserve is below the density allowed by l3each by DesiKn. The project meets the criteria contained �vithin the B�ach by Design Hotel Density Reserve Section as the site has not previously received density from the reserve, has not transferred density to another site, is less than 2.5 acres and is therefore eligible to receive up to 100 units. The accessory restaurant is consistent with mid- priced hotels and is comprised of approYimately 7% of the GFA �vell within the allowable limits for accessory amenities. 8 � The existing height meets the Beach by Design District height allowances, a Hurricane Evacuation Plan has been provided within the DVA package, the rooms are accessible through the interior lobby of the hotel; and a reservation system is in place with books and records available for inspection as needed. A traffic impact study has been provided and addresses transportation concurrency. The Quality Inn is an existing contemporary structure with metal roofs similar to the proposed Hampton Inn. Through this development proposal, with the use of color on the roof and on the building mass, the existing structure will be nicely updated to compliment the Key West Coastal Design of the proposed neighboring Hampton Inn. Massing, color and alignment datum lines will be noteworthy elements within the design. The design intent is that, while close in proximity, both hotels will still be seen as its own individual site and identity; it is not intended that the two hotels look alike but compliment one another. Through this development proposal, with the creative use of paint bands and coordination alignments of the adjacent base colors and patterns the existing building mass will appear more broken up as desired by Beach by Design. Decorative shutters and new tri-colored canopies will be present to better meet the applicable design guidelines. The existing design and proposed upgrades are respectful of the architectural vocabulary within Beach by Design and the community character; the building is in scale to its height and length. The existing hotel use is well established on the Beach, enjoying a strong yearly guest return rate and provides a highly desired mid-priced accommodations to Clearwater Beach; this proposal will not only retain the overnight accommodation units associated with the existing Quality Inn but will provide an additional 116 overnight accommodation units to the Beach and our local economy. Quality Inn 12.13.2012 by Renee Ruggiero/rmr C) : � p _ ¢ w� '���y. i`��`+�y�, t X'�..��, _ � �'��� '6 ii��"'�i{�b2a �i 4 I.Y��.=.. . i '*G��,+�y1x �`i. . . .'� .: '�/r� � .��',�'i Y . ♦ � (p � ,,:+.y ,�j �� r�. , fi1{�fl��� � ;�.� � `��= ••r.� �. , -�--•� y�� � �:�• �� • � , , , � � __:�.. .I#r � �. �i��:� ��,� ,�7/���. ���r��r,�. �' - `�� • / �f�1 �,r i ?��� ,�b�� ��% _ py , s 4� -. �< �s � � � -- �� � � � � �egr ►., ��' `�/��li. �.. ,'� '° '. �' �, ,*��� , �.,,�� ��i �/ ,����:i�, i;: ..�.��yi�+,��k ,/ � �;��,, I ___I ♦ �..�� t �� `�/��� � `� + � �� ��,:�i �����- ��� r'� �!���x ��„�a � r� �� :_ ��� °a",a� ;I`r- ��/ / / °: � Cy �� _ ':�,� i -= QS��,t % `. _ _ , , ; , � : h , . . :- . �• ►.�.., , I � - , �, ���►�,�,� ,���r. �:�,:: - v�.;��,;,�, , • _�. � • � a;�� . • � � �� �,�,„'!' � ,i • % � i w.i�'�1 � o����� '`� � � �. �� �jMlYryt#�,%���p��� w ��� ., , l��a',��a� - ` ��� . :. �_ . . , . r�� � ' , 1,.,�i;� � - �._��,j� ., . ,,. �t�-��o/ LEGEND � ��� 'a� � � L�164.03' NEw 6'TMicit � R=2700.00' �+�R����N � �.;. BRG�S81°57'29"E(M) VEHICUTARIlSE�RE1 t-� � '�u..w� x[w�'rHCr � �' . .a, ��sia ^ mwnnc � y� � ,,'+°'� "�:r� PA CRS�� � � ,� � A' M' ����I' �.r !,y �� � � �� � �N+. .r ��. aO�' Q � � ¢ ,/ a YGM�CNI 4d-�a_ y �� '� 'e� m x m L�83.9T y��' ....,�`�!Q R=2700.00' �me.•`°�'°��i.wcam�or v� C 9pa t � '�.,. . �� BRCa�S 66°35'2T'E�M) f 0 �lp y a^s4"' � +�88�s i � '�R� K�"�rorv- . ��..u.v sw�r�ar r.wrs ro wrw � � � �yn�;µ h �.-�'- . ��'�r�i � i 4�� � ��5 �.� iYl�MV�sxua Mw�O[Y 4GMx¢r n�uc�Na 1VBWISSTORY � "�y ������ � q ! lrwawJ xmu awa as v�x er�a n ucva�arai.wacxrs o�v�we � �� BUQ.DINCW/ "`°;.-�n ��d�Il� ' �'i����h���� �mor�m �"... a rwnv�xrr u nnrm ne�roo..m Nvo r uv � ���� PdRdClVCGARAG6,' �. q» � i� � �� ` ;,t'^� sr swx i� a�rm n�ae�ru ur m.an�nuv�ar c.nmir d V � � i I�,y �: � ` "`om"""' �..R,un..inw uraw �.'�� a��, ; p��ti ., �� � ��� ",,a��rwac�cscw r.anc.r. rwmc � ����� RnJ w� �� �; a �, : _d , �� r awrrm m wn rmr....mv � �;-�...... anmuivc�u. ' -' �„ a. �� ..� �`�� tk � �yi `" . S°y 6 � � � .. �� '. "° „'"Tmo- � We�u�N��3d: i x .,�x .. �°^�.. �; � ��,,� �n���aa �" -�" ��a� �� _ �� ,� y aP FDOr INDfX 515 � .��� tiA�`� �'� e � � � -�� _ s �q - (URBAN) �,... r a � � �'�a9'�a��t 3 '� - � � � NEW . . � t �, �� r . � . >.,., = a� . �` '' I�e� �� �'� � �`�` . �- � ''°�' AD, �� R � .r � � f; € i �y � � t�,,,,,.� FD( 20..A.�G, � � x :(,'-� � y e� �,'1�5 i �, :� �a.n" i y � � a. tvtanz i � ° �9� w� � i r�a t �"- ,nofiw-, i ;, ��3� f< ' �g ,,� �'� �G � "o �� ° ° Jt iCfP, ==__�_ �W ' ,�s�.�a@ ��`^ 4 � ,�" ii� re� °�� r � s�sm car.� �H ! : i � E i � �� � 'a�ii�� � -r�T � , 1 `c� �'r .�� d �.z ��ai �. �� �� �� 2k�.. '� rm•es azae - �� � � 8�4 :� � @s x ��� ti�€5. ,� F. , ; . �.dei+s.ldY,•rc .7 `�� `' I��. � luw Dy�: 70/tb/12 2 ��� �. `� a . �IU� t /lt'4S,?���`,5"�'YX��' . �' "!" �.we: n io� f - ��Nb7 ��� s . �6 p 2�� "��E �4 y t,°°ira:�?Uti,�l�}-��,'Zs4E rA� t ���� � �.��- � � a i � �p ! �� - rt Nn�p��q����8 aa ��p� �86tlik � � ' �al' � �F � ''� Y�',;..� �° i �� :S� � '����' ,ty.���� N'� � ��� y �s �,p " �4 �� �a,.�,� ;'" � �. � � ��� , a� �H� � w�r' �� � �'. � ��d° `t- ',•,�� � ' i� � ��� � ��P� � a �� � 1aC�.�: � �,F ` • r � �,� r '� � ,�' � �� PARCfL�A ��� � � � �I�N �&�d.o: �; '* �3 s i � � RAMP �9 � ��'�y����ua �fU3f! �a'" � ��� 4 r ,( . � '1�\, z �,'�.� c�,.�t"� ,i�!�"°: _a ' � n .r°w'" ; j a � � I p� � o M �` `� k �, , " , �1; s � ' � p��° sr 1 �,-.t< i� >� �s:3�w ��� � . .:� � mh. �fsi �'$ � 0 '^�'�� .�.y �r.�{ � •,\��`'�"1 �°� � # V �y�. �7 F W F � '°° 'V ,�"','•'+n-` � � �'� � `' FLUSH � �� ��� ��,° ' ' C� �e �� . �« ' , � ,� � � o �.� �_,'» �shz� �.::�� : : . x,i..eer.,, . � � �� � ��'''"�.,, � ��40bp.° C{ �� v _ p�� `' 0 -..,.� ` . �. a� _ � ! �"° � . � ..�S 32' w � �� �� ��� � v�y 7'-i� �-_� u`�_� e� ti. �'�: N�p� ��` �w e,.ti z-� � �� �o,3a, �oo°w u" ° � ,.�:,��.��41'°,Q, � ':�#� � X SCALE: 1"=10'� (i� N� 6 � y � : �%�-�-z � Rh ; �;r l :;:;i � ' n� C s S ���Y r %y}/' M cO8 Cb�g \ ~ r' V d�n f"+�.. �.. rM. ` � 10����G � °�k� - � � � � � NORTH � _�'° . , � L-102.d8' � � „ SCALE: 1"=20' ����w� �'��.R`1000.00' . ���....... Y - BRG=N 60'28'01"W�P)r � ��� BRCa N60°35'S4"W(M) po o io zo w ��0� � � LEGEND: #O 3 1. COVER OVER EXISTING - Q 2 SPLIT-FACED CMU WITH A _ C 2 � " PAINTED STUCCO. � � �" O � � C 2. PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM ��������x w��� �'�`��"�""°� BANDING. �� 3. PROVIDE BAHAMA SHUTTERS . O4. EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN, A O B , A �N�� EXISTING AWNING TO BE O O UPDATED TO TRI-COLOR. o- 5 s, � � 5. EXISTING CANOPY TO BE � �� � �� w` � `° REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH . �,� � �� K.�_ ,�;,, � ' v ��.. � �; � � � °` � ��, �� �� �, NEW CANOPY COVERING WALK . � � , � F � � � � - '��, ' a �, �� �� �`�� TO HAMPTON INN. �� � ���� �9 � � �- �i_�"� ��i/ % � %� � ���� e ��r � � , � � �� ��� _�= j�,� � � � �� � � ����� ,, � 6. EXISTING METAL ROOF PAINTED � �� �,'� ���� � �, ��� °�� � � � r ..,.� ' i ��'�, „.�g k��i',s�� 4'�j � , � �� i�i„ ���... � ��� �� � -� � � ��� � ��� � � � � � � , �� TO NEW COLOR. �� �� _ . `� � �,, , . �i . �i �t�' ' %j i .� � ��,� //r �i ✓"j// _ a L�. �'" / �r�i � ,��/ ��r � �� '�� i�i � � ° ��; � 3��� � ir/ /��0�� ,r� / 2 �;j� �i//r��% � � � � � k � � ���� �.�1, �/ �:s���j ,< � � � �. i� �� ///�/ �� � � r � � :� � ;: � � ��1;��,� , ��£ ,���y ,, � � � � � � , �� COLOR LEGEND: C � � ,� .. . , , �, ��: � �� �� ���� ` ` , � �� ' �� A. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: � q� ��. �" .�`� �y � � �' ii�„� ��s �� �� �r�"'" NR, e��h , � p 4� > j 2 S � � �. ��^1 % �� � .. / � � j ..�,,,,,,. �d."� ' x �i � � ;� � � � �,� � y�� � � u MODERNE WHITE SW6168 � � � �€ � � ,�� � � ,�� �� ���,�� % `�, �,���� � �� � ,.i � ..,.�� � _ ;�/�r,�i��% � �i r� ,�: � g�, +�a,a / ii c.» `.r �� . �i' � � e; i� %%i% y i//� /i��i �,"i�°.� � . i�"� � " w: � 'j�y tk �`s�,zn;:�_ .: . � � /��/ /�,i �,�/�,/��, �j//�"✓q 90 �.^e � ;;�� � .rq, 9��.�, g�r �iN�/t,� �,.i��'r��� �"�„���'"-'r`"� ,. � -:,�. ,a,,,,'�- `s',';� . � B. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: � �` ��. ��,, ��'�� � �°;,,, �,� �,,,,� a,,,,,�,,.,v � , �. � � �,�� -, ..., .�, .,., �„ �� .,..�� °� � '�"` '� �� � r' ��° AMBITIOUS AMBER SW6366 ,� �; �k� � �,y � � �;�� �, _ � - e..: � �,- � � � � �'� �- � C. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: � ` �� � ' �� �' ,; - FAMILIAR BEIGE SW6093 .� '-� - -a9�`� � �'?' ; �"'�'� ,xs:,t, � ='"�� � '' � D. BERRIDGE METAL A�OF ' �� �� �� �� � ��� � ,� KEY PLAN COLOR: TEAL GREEP� NOR�H SIDE ��� i DEC. 14, 2012 RESUMBITTAL FOR CDB �� . ' �Jt� 3�°i�t�,'S�CF��c�C°i �� i ' � ,. " �S�C)������ I ks I � � � i STEVE PAGE - PAGE COMPANIES g� TT T�T � � SHEET � w ^� ' I BOB LYONS - COASTAL CONSTRUCTION w o 655 Gulfview Blvd. �v1NN 1 I Clearwater Beach, FL A10.�L I 0 - LEGEND: #O 1. COVER OVER EXISTING - SPLIT-FACED CMU WITH A C 2 ,� PAINTED STUCCO. � 2. PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM ��,� ��*�.�,,w.,� � .w:.,,,�.,,� � �� BANDING. -�� 3. PROVIDE BAHAMA SHUTTERS . �_�`'�~� OO ' g $ ; 4. EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN, � Q� � � , ,� � � � ��� ��� ������� � � �� EXISTING AWNING TO BE ' - w _,���yR O , y 5 �m �, " � �< A ���" � � � � ,�� UPDATED TO TRI-COLOR. � _ �ti�,����jjj,,,������� �. �,,, ���� ' y �; 5. EXISTING CANOPY TO BE '; ,., ��� ,,. . �k� ���;, �B ��� � " REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH , � � � ; '/� / "� 4 p� � NEW CANOPY COVERING WALK ,�l'��� � 77�� �i �� �' �-�� ` ���� ���� TO HAMPTON INN. m ,,,, �. � � ' � a' '� , ,o � , `�` � � ��,�� �� - �„a ' � a,, , � �� 6. TAL R OF PAINTED � , XISTING ME s % � ou � �� �`° ��� � � � � TO NEW COLOR , < � ,� ,., ���, '' �� � , �i �. � � g _ , : ,�� , � . . �� ,. ,i . 9 , • , a� a�� � ::�/���� `"�y - ..<- ,.Ea:,., ' ,,,,_ . / ra �� /y 9 y ��i� �s �.< �/. v � �as � COLOR LEGEND: A r , ,�, ��� .i�'�, a� � �� e ,. � ��, � ������i ��i � ' l � � �� ` ��� � �. ��� a` � '� _ � $_ A SHERWIN WILLIAMS: 1�� ���� �„��� . • r ��. � � �r� � �` ����� "� W 168 Y� � , � .��� ��> � �r � � ' , ii/ � �� �,, �: � � �� . �,,, �� '� w� MODERNE WHITE 5 6 � ;. � � � '` � � .i „ �, ,�,�G/�i irii , ,�i,� � i h ,A�, �' k-�.,. ri � � . .A� �k":a` , . ��. ,;;�5„a � � .� � r. ���. 9" � "f� ,✓ �",' '� ✓. �.����;��9`�"�,�.��i%u,�,,,, .. � � °`zjiYr< "s'er.%c%:. � � B. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: .� �� � '�. ef n c.... ...' "���� u:_,.: ����`° '� '� � AMBITIOUS AMBER SW6366 '°� .� �'i- ix f �;,� � k � � '?� �/� P C. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: ��` ' a� a ` �' 'd 1' ,� FAMILIAR BEIGE SW6093 " g'�,'� �� a i. � � f .a !' +�yy�'�.%ai ,�' ' �`:�c - r��'���� D. BERRIDGE METAL ROOF � ��; �, �� �� �� � � �� � % : , �� ,_�.._, ...,.. ._�.,,w,,:... <._. .:.,.__�.�� _„ . r�.��,___ ,.�a�, .�_s, . � ,.:.��____ ..��� . .... , _ . COLOR. TEA�GREEN NORTH-EAS� SIDE KEY PLAN �I 'DEC. 14, 2012 RESUMBITTAL FOR CDB .� '�z�.Y1$�t�'�f:��� C; i ' . . �.5.�`.����C���;��A _ i ' � _ ,. _, , .. .. � i ! STEVE PAGE - PAGE COMPANIES o� �UALIT�' � / SHEET � i BOB LYONS - COASTAL CONSTRUCTION o 0 655 Gulfview Blvd. INN Clearwater Beach, FL A10.�3 " LEGEND: #O � � � � ��� 1. COVER OVER EXISTING � � � ���� '��"��' � �� � SPLIT-FACED CMU WITH A � `° �", � �,,, PAINTED STUCCO. �._ °^ "�< 2. PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM ��,° � � �'� BANDING. B A ���� ,� � ����� . " �_ 4" _ 4 y� � � . ,, �"��:°°�� � , � ��� � „ . EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN, ,� , � ���'�`� '°' �„�, ,� , °"���"� '� � ����„i �� a� `" � EXISTING AWNING TO BE a �F _ o: -, <� �,w �� , �� � � _ � ��,. � ��f � � � � w�' � " � UPDATED TO TR COLO � ' � � � �� ' ,;' � . ...�� �.rc�� .., � .,.� _ � m.. . ���� ;� ' - . �.._, I R 6 � , � � `����� ; � - ' � � � �� � , ;�. ���� � ' �� '� ' 5. EXISTING CANOPY TO BE ���� ,�� � ��� �<_ . � ��, �� �� ���� � � „ � � �� �/� , REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ,._ ������ '� � p� 6 � � ,� . A ' � ��,'%� ' �% „ ""� , RING WALK .. � f �� ' � � � • NEW CANOPY COVE �� , �, , � ° ; � �� , � ' f�� �'�� � oD i� A ,,,,u, ��� , , "�� o,� y��� ,,,�., � � �� � z� <,.o.� fs �` "� � � ��� � �`�� �� '����� -� '� " ' 6. E IS�T NG ME�TAL ROOF PAINTED F Pxn M , �� , 3 . ��,y �.� ,.�.� � /�y i /c, �5� . ,; f�� y/�,y�'% � s i � � � �e �f� - � � � � � �� TO NEW COLOR. , ; ��� � A F, ; i �.� � _, � , � � � 1 � �'� � a � � � ,� , � � "° ! �� �� a . � I ' ,° �40>h � � � ` �� ��� � r r i s ii/h � � �,�,� ,,tiy ` � ���� �� �° ���tt ���I�� ki�i���t �1� �i�������t (��,�,���t�:' %�� �.'ti�������� ����, COLOR LEGEND: A� � � � �� �, � �.. a�� a��t 3a�; , � i ,s�J@b�� ��� � s � � r� A. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: � �� a i � ���.� �, � '�'� � '�� _ ...�„ .. �s�^3��`��r � r?° -w m,�z���, .�, +" w �,. , , �°` .. .: .� ' , , € ? A� �' , _ . '�` .' �. ,�- .�� �'�� ��� ��� - : �� � ' `� ,, - MODERNE WHITE SW6168 4 / � � . ' �� £ � ��. + J1.�* p „ - . � � �� ,�� ��, � ' ' �. ,t�`�x ��tii> � E; �� � �� ��T N��� �.. B. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: � � ,����� ,,�' � � �� �i��'� �� AMBITIOUS AMBER SW6366 �� � '� �,�� , i ���r ���, � � � C. SHERWIN WILLIAMS; � >�� � ' �- ; ,' �� FAMILIAR BEIGE SW6093 . . q g�� .:j�. -.., A � 9 7 ' �+i���r�. `�wm; ' n � � � � ����� �� � =��� �• �`�''' � D. BERRIDGE METAL R�OF � KEY PLAN COLOR: TEAL GREEN SOUTH SIDE DEC. 14, 2012 RESUMBITTAL FOR CDB ',�r�1'i�l'�;'��f?�e� I1 � �SSCJf;"(���� �,��: � � I Q , � , � I STEVE PAGE - PAGE COMPANIES g� �UALITY �� SHEET � wi '����, BOB LYONS - COASTAL CONSTRUCTION �0 655 Gulfview Blvd. INN Clearwater Beach, FL Q� �.�L� j - LEGEND: #� 1. COVER OVER EXISTING � SPLIT-FACED CMU WITH A PAINTED STUCCO. 2. PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM B C 2 BANDING. C 2 3. PROVIDE BAHAMA SHUTTERS . ��v"` °"`' 4. EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN, � � �° �� /� �' °~~�"'"`�""� � ��� � EXISTING AWNING TO BE a.v � , .:.. • ..... . .� , ,,,.a. � � , ,� � F g ,,. UPDATED TO TRI-COLORo � � < � �, ����' � �� w „�,- � Q 5. EXISTING CANOPY TO BE , ,�,� --~ "�.` , �., �� :: /a � REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH �, ,i�'� �,� '� � � , 5 �� � � ,� .� �., ����� �...:����� �� .� �,� � p �; �� RING WALK NEW CANOPY COVE ,.�� ,�� , ��, , � � , ;� TO HAMPTON INN. �� ,, � �� � . � �� '��� �,f.�: 6 � �� 6. EXISTING METAL ROOF PAINTED . �� � � � � D 6 �...., . � �n � � �� TO NEW COLOR. g ,,�r�� ��� � � Q � I y��, g � � ,: � � i ,� r � � -� ie,�s . �� �, �oi o � � . � � `L' �` ��. �' �n � i „ „ „� „ ��%/ P , ,, , .. ' � A ,^�� '-`� .�"..,b'Z�..,�.�; , ,,,� ... � " COLOR LEGEND. A , _�,�, ,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,� , , � �. - � ti � �� � � A. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: ��°� � � � �r �� � � � ; k,� ��a .� � , � , ��� � �� � �. � , s �r � ; � n MODERNE WHITE SW6168 .., � - � /ii%�� ,, � '� y�// � � �`�'y�' �, �� � uF ; 4 3 i s ,a..p .���,,,,,� �°�.`��"�';,, "' . , i�„� , / i//%i j/��� i j��/� % /,s /.: /y/�' � n ��,t,,'�,+�a �'4"Y,i:, ��-Y, �.,:� �.^'_ ��'' ��; ,ivii��//% �% . .. -�'�y� „ � �" nr � �� :�"� B SHERWIN WILLIAMS � � .� , � �a� � � . , : , � � � �, �b ��- � rc� • . � � � � � '�: �_� � r�°� � '�`�" F� �'��;� AMBITIOUS AMBER SW6366 %/%//,., /ii/ * a: s � ���. � <;,� ;��� �'�/,�/���%��i� �� �" �� , t ' �i�,<,,,<,. � � ,���,a�����,� �� � � � �� ���/��� �< '����`� �� �:.� w� ; � C. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: � . ��, '�l��////�/��� �/�///ii�aii�/�f/r „ ,� �_ �,���j �', �, FAMILIAR BEIGE$W6093 i��y�s r i / ���� ///// -��_s /�/i_� j i�� / �j��%%///i// <9R �:.� ���(.,� . i r! /� '�'����i'�ii ��/ - d��L�, eO $'`�,'� r:; .�.� .. �. �� � E �� �'�?`"'� D. BERRIDGE METAL ROOF� v �� „ r������ � , � ' �,,�,_�:... ,. :;.�,������,, " KEY PLAN COLOR: TEAL GREEN iNEST SIDE � \` �� , �� i DEC. 14, 2012 RESUMBITTAL FOR CDB � ��p� j�,���p� ��; . ��Z�3�Iz'���`� I '_— __.._ � , � � � , ��- ' , i � ��;�� � I STEVE PAGE - PAGE COMPANIES g� �UALITY SHEET ww ' BOB LYONS - COASTAL CONSTRUCTION o 0 655 Gulfview Blvd. INN Clearwater Beach, FL A10.�5 - � LEGEND: #O � 3 1. COVER OVER EXISTING . A 2 SPLIT-FACED CMU WITH A . C 2 � �� PAINTED STUCCO. � OB � 2 C 2. PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM µ ��"""�"' BANDING. � � � -- 3. PROVIDE BAHAMA SHUTTERS . 4. EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN, O ! O ` � EXISTING AWNING TO BE � 3 _ O O � 5 � UPDATED TO TRI-COLOR. �'" ��` "� �' '"" D 5. EXISTING CANOPY TO BE � a �`"'" ` °'' �� � �y j���� ° 6 � REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH 4 �_ .� �. �... .' • i , . ,, �� � � � � � ° �`°� �� �a NEW CANOPY COVERING WALK �� � � -� ` "' TO HAMPTON INN. � � ° � � r��. ��� ��`* �� °� ��� ���:���'.��� �'��i � 6. EXISTING METAL ROOF PAINTED � � � 4 TO NEW COLOR. ' i � COLOR LEGEND: AO ' � ' ; A. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: > '� °-��� ���,'�,� ' � � � MODERNE WHITE SW6168 � '� '��: ; . � ��.�, .,"�, , �� - ` m� �� • B. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: � � :, AMBITIOUS AMBER SW6366 s ,,. ��. .. _�, .�. �. �, � � ���- `�� ` ��` ' C. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: s� �� : "" .�, . , - t�,��:�._._ ,� • - , ,�,�� ',-�-'� � • FAMILIAR BEIGE SW6093 , ?'•�,� _' ,, � � �; �fJ D. BERRIDGE METAL ROOF NORTH SI DE ��KEY PLAN COLOR: TEAL GREEN \I�V . DEC. 14, 2012 RESUMBITTAL FOR CDB S a n t i e s t e b a n � � Associates ��� A R C H I T E C T S — ��� ci5 ti � dn ,�.i ti�cF �ho 813. �t i P F ,'i 5 J'� STEVE PAGE - PAGE COMPANIES g� �� ����� ���,,������ SHEET �UALITY BOB LYONS - COASTAL CONSTRUCTION o 0 655 Gutfview Blvd. INN Clearwater Beach, FL A') O.02 - `" LEGEND: #O � <" 1. COVER OVER EXISTING . C 2 SPLIT-FACED CMU WITH A � PAINTED STUCCO. � _,.-.,,,,� 2. PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM � BANDING. O 3. PROVIDE BAHAMA SHUTTERS . O O4. EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN, B EXISTING AWNING TO BE O O UPDATED TO TRI-COLOR. , . B � �I 5. EXISTING CANOPY TO BE O `''� REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH B �m � _ � �.� �_� ,.,�,,� � � NEW CANOPY COVERING WALK � �� TO HAMPTON INN. ��� ��C� , �������' ' ; ' � j $ , ' I � 6. EXISTING METAL ROOF PAINTED �.��_ � � ��"""'�'�� ��� � TO NEW COLOR. m _..�. ._, „ t �� `� _. . � , .. ,�� _� __ .., � COLOR LEGEND: A� ! .����, '� . ' � ' � °'- A. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: �- , '" "�"\ -,,�:;+.`�` � � �' '�� ,��: MODERNE WHITE SW6168 , . . � � '� �, � «-�.., � � � ��,.� �-, ,N. � �� 'x '},`' �_� � . ' .;,. ,. B. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: � � ��`�� '�� �� ��� �� AMBITIOUS AMBER SW6366 . � C. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: �,u�.., Q .�,�;�'�,��- � ^�� FAMILIAR BEIGE SW6093 �y"p, ; ; JqA,'`w'R��3 . . �� ry"'I� ` D. BERRIDGE METAL ROOF � N KEY PLAN COLOR: TEAL GREEN NORTH-EAST SIDE � , DEC. 14, 2012 RESUMBITTAL FOR CDB �S a n t i e s t e b a n Associates ;:�A R C H I T E C T 5 - A15 5 Ho a d A .�n F 13FOt STEVE PAGE - PAGE COMPANIES o� �� � 8 3����� � � SHEET �UALITY BOB LYONS - COASTAL CONSTRUCTION o 0 655 Gulfview Blvd. 1NN Clearwater Beach, FL Q'� o.03 - LEGEND: #O ���� ��4�� � 1. COVER OVER EXISTING `���` SPLIT-FACED CMU WITH A �P� PAINTED STUCCO. .,,�'` 2. PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM B A BANDING. . , 3. PROVIDE BAHAMA SHUTTERS . �' � 4. EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN, _ . �"`„°?�" M ,, ° ' ;� ��+M�a� � ��� EXISTING AWNING TO BE D : . ' " � — --��"'°—'� � UPDATED TO TRI-COLOR. 6 . : � y,�"'* ..,�'.� � ,.•, _ ,�� .. �� 5. EXISTING CANOPY TO BE , � .,' � ; � REMOVED AND REPIACED WITH A �' ���``' � �,� . NEW CANOPY COVERING WALK � j � � � TO HAMPTON INN. r�.� � �, � '; 6. EXISTING METAL ROOF PAINTED v 11� �',� ��, 1� '�� �� � � � ��� � � '�, TO NEW COLOR. ��y�y��" � !, 'II►C��Ill "►� �'� I 1�_ , _._.._....._ ._ . .�..�,�..,�.. _-'T^�k�'. �,�`�� "� �l "J _ � 4 'lyyl � !� p�����1 I.il���' ���� ���� �}It� ��l� i � g � ' ,t�w �� - � 1� + � ��������t�r �,�� r�� COLOR LEGEND: A� � � � � ' �d��������_�� t�� �9n �x �11 a��t � � � ,,,. :�r . � � - A. HER I � � S W N WILLIAMS. ' . �. , , '4 e � ;'? "�. d _ _� � ,�� � � '`"�, � `- ' � ' '�-�� \ ��\' MODERNE WHITE SW6168 � z . :�n. y , �`,ri� ;� �: - -� • •�� "'` B. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: � � , , . '��" � a AMBITIOUS AMBER SW6366 �.: ' � C. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: ,,,� � ,,,,.,r� �� .�..�-i�' �„,�-�� ^��� FAMILIAR BEIGE SW6093 '� '' e / f � I r ».�' �„ ��. ?' �yi �. .. . . + .' , .. � � . .� } q � - !I ' �� �� � � "�� �� �``—' D. BERRIDGE METAL ROOF I SOUTH SIDE � � KEY PLAN COLOR: TEALGREEN � , DEC. 14, 2012 RESUMBITTAL FOR CDB ��S a n t i e s t e b a n Associates ;:�A R C H I T E C T S - At5 H � d a ;FCE � � ,■ i�ho 0 3 2�� , ,'i. 5 � (. STEVE PAGE - PAGE COMPANIES o� �UALITY SHEET BOB LYONS - COASTAL CONSTRUCTION o 0 655 Gulfview Blvd. INN Clearwater Beach, FL A'� O.04 ' LEGEND: #O 1. COVER OVER EXISTING � ""� SPLIT-FACED CMU WITH A PAINTED STUCCO. 2. PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM B C 2 e BANDING. � 2 ,. 3. PROVIDE BAHAMA SHUTTERS . I 4. EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN, B A � � EXISTING AWNING TO BE � �a"�er°°'€ UPDATED TO TRI-COLOR. A � 5. EXISTING CANOPY TO BE � �;:: O ; REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH 5 � _ t .�,,:,�, ��.� `" � � ` � NEW CANOPY COVERING WALK ��� � 1 TO HAMPTON INN. �3. � ; . �, .:u� �� _��' ��� �"^°�~� ���� � � � 6 �` � 6. EXISTING METAL ROOF PAINTED ` F •�— � TO NEW COLOR. � _ , .�,�._,_,.. � - � _ �� � ,� � A � � � _� � �p ' � COLOR LEGEND: A `� .r O �g�—_µ — ' ` �. ! �- ��- A. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: �. ^a�, ' ` rr ' '* �� r��. MODERNE WHITE SW6168 . �-�, �Mws � � �E. " ""�°�° � B. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: ; ,� � � ,� � . ..,: �,���.-� � �` � �� ��� �� AMBITIOUS AMBER SW6366 ' C. SHERWIN WILLIAMS: ° �, �s'' � '� '�� FAMILIAR BEIGE SW6093 � � ��.�`�f ' �, t I �`� � ' D. BERRIDGE METAL ROOF ��� � N KEY PLAN COLOR: TEAL GREEN WEST SIDE , DEC. 14, 2012 RESUMBITTAL FOR CDB ��S a n t i e s t e b a n Associates . ,:: A R C H I T E C T S ,�a�s H � d r ,� n i ace— f'ha 313. .I 5 .,..'.. � STEVE PAGE - PAGE COMPANIES o� �UALITY a � SHEET BOB LYONS- COASTAL CONSTRUCTION �0 655 Gulfview Blvd. INI�T Clearwater Beach, FL A'� o.05