The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2012-10017; 45 PAPAYA ST� � � �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD r � e� � - � PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT � '�`��- STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: December 18, 2012 AGENDA ITEM: D. 2. CASE: FLD2o1z-iooi� REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit a Restaurant use of 522 square feet in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 2,799 square feet; lot width of 60 feet; a front (north) setback of 3.5 feet(to patio) and five feet(to building), a front(east) setback of 3.25 feet (to patio) and 26 feet (to building), a side (south) setback of 0.75 feet (to patio), 0.5 feet(to service driveway) and six feet(to building); a side(west) setback of 0.5 feet (to service driveway) and 7.9 feet (to building) and to delay the undergrounding of adjacent overhead utilities until such time as adjacent parcels are redeveloped, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-803.0 and to permit a 500 square foot, 28-seat outdoor cafe located within the Poinsettia Avenue right-of-way under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-909. GENERAL DATA: i Agent........................... Alex Azan; The Sustainability Group, Inc. . I Applicant/Owner............. John and Christina Pimenidis � LoCation.......................... 45 Papaya Street; southwest corner of Papaya Street and Poinsettia Avenue Property Size.................... 0.064 Acres Future Land Use Plan...... Resort Facilities High(RFH) Zoning.......................... Tourist(T)District Special AreB Plan.............. Beach by Design(RetaiURestaurant District) Adjacent Zoning.... North: Tourist(T)District South: Tourist(T)District East: Tourist(T)District West: Tourist(T)District Existing Land Use............. Attached Dwellings(two units) P►'oposed Land Use......... Restaurant (522 square feet) with an 80-seat onsite outdoor cafe and a 500 square foot, 28-seat outdoor cafe within the Poinsettia Avenue right-of-way ?...,,_ ' � .! r' ',.� � '` ��. '�',',��, ` �.. "I +l /'1� �+ ��. . . � �:� '�. ? ..,...�.....r_! �� • r'z. _ . , ��1, � "'"' . • ��.�..�� .'�° �i,c at�_�-� �I a.: M • t �t�a � e,, '*"� �, � ��i;��i i�i �r . �. �'- "� � � � .r�'� `t� ;�, ' , � �.t,y'',.� � �" �� .. ' "� �� ~ � 1 G 1'. !� . � Y ��.. �,��r� , ::1 , .� � J M , ' !u"` ,'�7 ` � �►� . ,; -;,1 � � � � ' "' � a , � *� k . r'r 1,�-_�-y. , +� � �� ,� '�' �� ♦> � � I = �r� � � � ��l �� '1�� ,�' ��— { .i l� � . ,,t . �4 ��l+� � �, r � � " • ! -4ia._.,,� �� '� ' �, �,� � � � � �� ` � �, h J i�' . � r�� .�►�.��,�r� .', i� �,��+r...�' ,�,��►,+ � ___ _ � � C��1►�t1.1 Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLArrrrING&�EV�LOPMENT P Pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION . —�/\/\/�/�.� _.. �.,h`:'... � . EN�FLL �"•^^'� ANALYSIS: o 08�� a �� Location and Existing Conditions: _ _ The 0.064 acre site is located at the southwest R� �« Pa corner of Papaya Street and Poinsettia Avenue �' within the Tourist (T) District. The subject �YM�T �` � ��FF P�`�t� property, comprised of one parcel with frontage PROJECT �,,,�,a o` sire � so of approximately 60 feet along Papaya Street � � _ � °� P�� j PFPNTh and 50 feet along Poinsettia Avenue, is also > k H ,-�, o�ar f^ss located within the Retail and Restaurant District � � � of Beach by Design. The immediate area is P,,,,a U �.,�, �,,, ,� characterized b a variet of uses includin � """°"" Y Y g older overnight accommodation, retail and � i � attached dwelling uses. Several lots and � �„ buildings in the neighborhood are vacant. For �sE�o�o°� �F�--� �� example, the True Value hardware store across LOCATION MAP Poinsettia Street to the east has been vacant for approximately seven years. Many of the �. , tl. properties along Papaya Street and Poinsettia �� a� Avenue include parkin g s paces located at least � �� M; µ = £ ri ht-of-wa . Redevelo ment in this area of the - -4 PAP �I « W partially within and which back out mto the "' . R p.. a ' I uv ' W g Y P AvA sT - - ., Beach has mostly been though the refurbishing , : ,►•e•a; ; � of a few properties with the notable exception ,,, - �•••.' � of Belle Harbor at the northeast corner of °' °' Q ' " Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. The � =�T... W °' 2 „ properties to the north and south along Q a �°°' a Poinsettia Avenue are generally characterized Q °' �_� , _ by the back ends of businesses fronting on � ; � �9 Mandalay Avenue and small motels and -.�= I , P attached dwellings generally located on the east ': .aH side of and fronting on Poinsettia Avenue. p' �°� Properties along Papaya Street to the east and ZONING MAP west are a mix of attached dwellings, restaurants, motels and retail. The properties at the northeast and southeast corners of Papaya Street East Share Drive have recently been the subject of site plans recently reviewed and approved by the Community Development Board including a seven-story, 134-unit mid-priced hotel including a 6,500 square foot restaurant and a 10,749 square foot restaurant with a 28-slip commercial dock, respectively. Both development proposals include 15-foot wide publicly- accessible boardwalks along the Intracoastal Waterway. The site is currently developed with a two-unit attached dwelling located in a one-story building. The site does not include any Code-compliant parking spaces. Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 1 of 16 • � �1.�t� + r PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT : C �t�i n alel Levei II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION ��: Development Proposal: T'he proposal is to construct a 522 square foot restaurant with two outdoor cafes consisting of 80 seats onsite and 28 seats located within the Poinsettia Avenue right-of-way along the east property line of the subject site. The proposed building will house the kitchen, restrooms and storage areas; all proposed seating will be outdoors. The existing building and a11 other structures on site will be removed with the proposal. Setback reductions are requested on all sides of the site with a front (north) setback of 3.5 feet (to patio) and five feet (to building), a front (east) setback of 3.25 feet (to patio), a side (south) setback of 0.75 feet (to patio), 0.5 feet (to driveway) and six feet(to building) and a side (west) setback of 0.5 feet(to service driveway) and 7.9 feet(to building. The one-story restaurant is proposed at a height of approximately 12 feet from Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the mid-point of the highest roof structure (17.5 feet from grade). As mentioned, the building will only contain the kitchen, serving area, storage space and restrooms. A gated service driveway eight feet in width will be located along the west property line providing access to the operational rear of the building as well as a four yard dumpster. The dumpster will be maneuvered into place along Papaya Street for servicing. As mentioned, all 108 seats will be outdoors with 80 seats located onsite and an additional 28 seats located adjacent to the site within the Poinsettia Avenue right-of-way. The restaurant will operate between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. seven days a week with additional hours for breakfast on the weekends starting at 7:30 a.m. The applicant anticipates the proposed restaurant will create six new jobs. The proposed building can be characterized as an interpretation of a mix of tropical bungalow vernacular with elements of traditional Key West-style of architecture including a metal standing seam roof, exposed rafter tails, wide accent corner trim and a wide frieze running the perimeter of the building. A solid bamboo fence six feet in height will be provided along the south and west sides of the site. A three foot non-opaque fence will be located along Papaya Street and Poinsettia Avenue providing physical separation from the streets but allowing a visual connection between the private and public realms. Please note that this is in contrast to the submitted site plans which indicate a four foot fence. The applicant indicated their preference to maintain the fence at three feet subsequent to their package submittal to the CDB. Two gates will provide pedestrian access to the site with one gate located along the north side of the site near the proposed building and the second gate roughly centrally located along the east side of the site. Two exterior colors are proposed including the natural grey of the metal roof and light gray for the siding(see color samples included in the submittal packet). The site is designed to be pedestrian-friendly with the provision of entrances along Papaya Street and Poinsettia Avenue, tropically-themed landscaping along the north (Papaya Street), east (Poinsettia Avenue) and south sides of the site, a six foot wide sidewalk along Papaya Street and a 15 foot wide sidewalk along Poinsettia Avenue. Approximately seven feet of the sidewalk along Poinsettia Avenue will be occupied by the 28-seat outdoor cafe. The proposal will also include street tree plantings along Poinsettia Avenue (location, materials, fit and finish to be coordinated with and approved by City Staf�. A minimum of five feet will be provided on the sidewalk along Poinsettia Avenue in any given area. Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 2 of 16 � � C�bN,I R�l�r Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPNIENT REVIEW DIVISION � . .,z�s:��,>�::-,.. .. Special Area Plan: Beach b Dy�gn: Retail and Restaurant District The City has demonstrated through the creation of Beach by Design and subsequent amendments to this plan that it recognizes the need for pedestrian-friendly development in order to create a vibrant active resort and waterfront destination serving tourists and locals alike. It is understood that a broad range of uses including retail sales and service, hotels and motels and restaurants contribute to the creation of the unique character and atmosphere that is Clearwater Beach. The vision of the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design provides that North Mandalay Avenue is to be an attractive street with limited functionality as a two-sided "retail street." As a result, it is desired and envisioned that the land area between North Mandalay Avenue and Poinsettia Avenue will transform into a pedestrian-friendly retail/restaurant district. The document further acknowledges that development within the District may be inhibited by existing parcel size and depths and that a key to success is the construction of a parking garage. A recent Code amendment further recognizes the limitations of the properties within this district and eliminates the requirement for the provision of off-street paxking. This is one of the first restaurant redevelopment projects proposed within the Retail and Restaurant District since the adoption of Beach by Design. Beach b Dy esi,�n: Section VII. Design Guidelines: Section A specifically addresses the issue of density. The proposal does not include any dwelling units or overnight accommodation units. Therefore this section is not applicable to the proposal. Section B specifically addresses height. The proposal provides for a building approximately 12 feet in height as measured from BFE where a height of up to 35 feet is permitted. Therefore this section is not applicable to the proposal. Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet or a single dimension greater than 100 feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint of the building is 522 square feet and no single plane of the building exceeds 30 feet therefore this guideline is not applicable to the application. Regardless,the design of the building is broken up by offsets in the fa�ade and varying heights of the roofline providing for a modest yet interesting and attractive building. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. No building fa�ade is greater than 30 feet in length. Therefore this section is not applicable to the proposal. - � Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation (with elevation being defined as that portion of a building that is visible from a particular point outside the parcel proposed for development) to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The application indicates compliance with this requirement through the use of windows, doors and architectural details into the north and east (front) fa�ades. The south and west facades face adjacent buildings and are not readily visible from off site. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section D addresses the issues of sidewalk widths, setbacks and stepbacks. The distance between the edge of the right-of-way along local streets and a building should be a minimum of 12 feet where the proposal provides a distance of six feet along papaya Street and 15 feet along Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-]0017—Page 3 of 16 � ld�.(�l 1'1'Rlei Level II Flexible Develo ment lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT ' P MP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION u .. .��,,,...�?."__�..._ . . . Poinsettia Avenue. Currently, the only existing sidewalk adjacent to the subject site is along a portion of the site at the corner of Papaya Street and Poinsettia Avenue. Otherwise sidewalks do not exist adjacent to the subject site. Given the diminutive size of the site parceling a portion of the site for use as part of a sidewalk is not practicable. The proposal provides the m�imum amount of sidewalk width practicable. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section E addresses issues of street-level facades and the incorporation of human-scale features into the facades of buildings. The proposed building provides an interpretation of the classic Key West-style architecture through the provision of a variety of building materials common to the vernacular such as a metal standing seam roof and board and batten siding. The building is approximately 12 feet in height as measured from BFE to the mid-point of the highest peaked roof structure and is proportionally-sized for the site. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section F addresses issues related to parking areas. No parking is proposed to be located on the site. Therefore this section is not applicable to the proposal. Section G addresses issues related to signage. A sign package has not been included with the submittal. Any proposed signage will be required to meet the requirements of this section of Beach by Design and any applicable portions of the Community Development Code. Section H addresses issues related to sidewalks (also addressed in part by Section D, above) and provides that all sidewalks along arterials and retail streets should be at least 10 feet in width. An existing sidewalk approximately four feet in width is located along Papaya Street adjacent to the subject site. No sidewalk currently exists along Poinsettia Avenue. The proposal includes increasing the width of the sidewalk along Papaya Street to five feet and providing a sidewalk 15 feet in width along Poinsettia Avenue. While the proposed sidewalk along Papaya Street does not strictly meet the vision of this section it is the widest sidewalk possible between the subject site and the street. Incorporating a portion of the sidewalk on the subject property is not practicable given the small size of the site. Therefore the proposed six foot sidewalk along Papaya Street meets the intent of this section while the proposed 15 foot sidewalk along Poinsettia Avenue meets the letter of this section. This section also provides that portions of a required sidewalk may be used for outdoor dining and landscaping. A 28-seat outdoor cafe is proposed along the east side of the site within the Poinsettia Avenue right-of-way extending approximately seven feet into the sidewalk space. Two at-grade landscape planters three feet in width are proposed within this right-of-way as well. The minimum pedestrian walkway width will be five feet. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section I addresses issues related to street furniture and bicycle racks. Street furniture is not proposed with this development, however, a bike rack is. The exact location as well as material and style of the bike rack will be approved by and coordinated with City Staff. Therefore, this Guideline is met by this proposal. Section J addresses issues related to street lighting. Street lighting is not proposed with this development. Therefore this section is not applicable to the proposal. Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 4 of 16 > lr�LUl 1'►�Le�Level II Flexible Development Application Review nEVELOrMErr&r xev�w nrv�ox � ..,�,y�,.. . , . Section K addresses issues related to fountains. A fountain is not proposed with this development. Therefore this section is not applicable to the proposal. Section L addresses issues related to materials and colors. Finish materials and building colors are required to reflect Florida or coastal vernacular themes. The proposal includes a tropical Key-west style vernacular and meets the intent of this section. The installation methodology, materials, fit, finish and/or styles for the proposed sidewalks, bike rack and right-of-way landscaping will be approved by and coordinated with City Staff prior to installation. Two exterior colors are proposed including the natural grey of the metal roof and light gray for the siding (see color samples included in the submittal packet). The applicant may adjust the color scheme however any such adjustment would require Staff approval and must meet the requirements of this portion of the Design Guidelines. The proposed color scheme and material schedule meets the requirements of this section. Development Parameters Floor Area Ratio: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-801.1, the maa�imum FAR for properties with a Future Land Use Plan(FLUP) designation of Resort Facilities High is 1.0. The proposal is for a total of 522 square feet of floor area which yields an FAR of 0.19, which is consistent with the Code provisions and less than the existing FAR of 0.59. Impervious Sur�ace Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Section 2-801.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.95. The overall proposed ISR is 0.80, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no minimum required lot area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to CDC Table 2-802, Flexible Standaxd Development Standards, the minimum lot area for restaurants can range between 5,000 and 10,000 square feet. The lot area is 2,787 square feet. Pursuant to the same Table,the minimum lot width for restaurants can range between 50 and 100 feet. The lot width along Papaya Street is approximately 60 feet. The proposal does not meet the lot area requirements for restaurants of CDC Tables 2-802 or 2-803 and must therefore be reviewed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there are no minimum required setbacks for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to CDC Table 2- 802 (Flexible Standaxd Development Standards), the minimum front setback for restaurant uses can range between zero and 15 feet and minimum side setback between zero and 10 feet. Rear setbacks, under the provisions of 3-903.D, do not apply to the subject site as it is a corner lot with two front and two side setbacks. The proposal includes a front (north) setback of five feet (to building and 3.5 feet (to patio), a front (east) setback of 26 feet(to building) and 3.25 feet(to patio), a side (south) setback of 0.75 feet (to patio), 0.5 feet (to driveway) and six feet (to building) and a side (west) setback of 7.9 feet (to building) and 12 feet (to patio). The proposal does meets the setback requirements of CDC Table 2-802 and would otherwise be reviewed as a Level I Flexible Standard Development application notwithstanding the request to reduce the required lot area and width. Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 5 of 16 ' ��L[aL 1'�al�e,t Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ��.J"U/'�1^�../1�./�„i '"�°"F-.: .... . Ma.ximum Building Hei,ght: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, there is no maximum height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, pursuant to the aforementioned CDC Table 2-802, the maximum allowable height for restaurant uses can range between 35 and 50 feet. The proposed building height of 12 feet from Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to the mid- point of the highest roof structure is below the range of height provided in the Code and no variation from the Code is requested. Minimum O,�'f-street Parkin� Pursuant to CDC Tables 2-802 and 2-803, there is no minimum off-street parking requirement for properties within the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design. The proposal does not provide any off-street parking and is therefore consistent with the Code provisions of Article 2 Division 8 and Beach by Design and no flexibility from the Code is necessary. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, a11 outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets andlor abutting properties. There will be mechanical equipment located on the west fa�ade of the building. This area will be adequately screened from view from adjacent properties and rights-of-way by a six-foot high fence and the building itself. This screening of the mechanical equipment will also be reviewed at time of the building permit submission. Sight Visibilitv Trian�les: � Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the intersection of streets andlor driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. This proposal does not propose any structures within the required sight visibility triangles and landscaping within them will be limited to groundcovers and low shrubs, complying with this provision. This proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Landscaping located within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. There are existing overhead utility lines, serving this development, within the rights-of-way along the south side of Papaya Street and the west side of Poinsettia Avenue that will need to be undergrounded. The applicant has requested that the undergrounding of these utilities is not practicable at this time given the modest size of the lot. The applicant has agreed that adjacent overhead utilities will be relocated underground when either adjacent property is redeveloped but such undergrounding will be limited to the utilities along the street where such redevelopment is occurring and if practicable. In other words, when the property to the south of the subject site along Poinsettia Avenue is redeveloped the property owner of this site (45 Papaya Street) will coordinate the undergrounding of the adjacent utilities along the east side of the subject site along Poinsettia Avenue with the undergrounding of the overhead utilities adjacent to the neighboring property to the south. The same applies for the redevelopment of the parcel to the west of the subject site Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 6 of 16 *_ V�Q�1 naLei Level II Flexibie Develo ment lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P APP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION U �.v'�:?;t�3"�. . . along Papaya Street. The only exception will be if the undergrounding of overhead utilities is deemed to be impracticable due to the existence and direct conflict of existing underground utilities and/or if the owning entity refuses to allow the undergrounding of their respective utility. However, the applicant will place all service lines leading onto the property underground, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Landscaping_ Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D,there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this site. This proposal meets the required minimum five-foot wide building foundation landscape area along Papaya Street and also includes perimeter plantings approximately five feet in width along the remainder of the north side of the site as well as the west property line and a portion of the south side of the site. The site will be planted with palm trees (Mexican Washingtonian and Florida Royal Palms), accent trees (crape myrtle and wax privet), shrubs (hibiscus, sage and ixora) and ground covers (India hawthorn, lantana, perennial peanut and beach sunflower). Solid Waste: A dumpster, proposed at the southwest corner of the site, will be screened by the building on the north and east and a solid wall with a stucco finish matching the primary exterior color of the restaurant on the south. A six-foot solid fence is proposed along the west side of the site. The dumpster will not be visible from off-site. The access gate to the dumpster will match the proposed six-foot high fence proposed along the west and south sides of the site. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste and Fire Departments. Si�naQe: The proposal does not include a freestanding sign at this time. However, any future freestanding sign must be designed as a monument-style sign, maintain a setback of five feet, match the exterior materials and color of the building and be a maximum height of four feet. Attached signage is not proposed at this time but must also meet Code requirements. All signage will be required to meet the applicable portions of the Community Development Code and the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Comprehensive Plan: The proposal is supported by applicable various Goals, Objectives and/or Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan as follows: Future Land Use Plan Element Policy A.3.2.1 All new development or redevelopment of property within the City of Clearwater shall meet all landscape requirements of the Community Development Code. The proposal, as discussed, meets the requirements of the CDC providing foundation planting along the north fa�ade of the building and perimeter landscaping along the north, east and a portion of the south sides of the site. Objective A.5.5 - Promote high quality design standards that support Clearwater's image and contribute to its identity. The proposal includes the demolition of a dated two-unit attached dwelling use and the redevelopment of the site with a new attractive restaurant. The proposed restaurant meets the Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 7 of 16 r C��tiL�.l Level II Flexible Develo ment lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P APP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION un=�^. .. . . requirements of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design, is supported by the vision of the Retail and Restaurant District and supports this Objective. Policy A.5.5.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or envisioned character of the neighborhood. As mentioned above, the proposal is consistent with the vision of Beach by Design, the Retail and Restaurant District and the Design Guidelines and supports this Policy. Objective A.6.1 - The redevelopment of blighted, substandard, inefficient andlor obsolete areas shall be a high priority and promoted through the implementation of redevelopment and special area plans, the construction of catalytic private projects, city investment, and continued emphasis on property maintenance standards. In adopting Beach by Design the City recognized that large portions of the Beach could be classified as blighted, substandard and suffered from "obsolescence and age". One of the goals of Beach by Design is to reverse this trend of disinvestment. This goal is well on the way to being met (perhaps even exceeded) in many axeas of the Beach. The Retail and Restaurant District is one area which has not seen a great deal of redevelopment activity. For example, the property across Poinsettia Avenue to the east (formerly a True Value hardware store) has been vacant for the better part of a decade. The proposed restaurant should be seen as an important first step in revitalizing this area of the Beach and supports this Objective. Policy A.6.4.1 - The development or redevelopment of small parcels [less than one (1) acreJ which are currently receiving an adequate level of service shall be specifically encouraged by administration of land development and concurrency management regulatory systems as a method of promoting urban infill. The proposal includes the redevelopment of a parcel with an area of 0.064 acres which currently receives an adequate level of service. Furthermore, the proposal is consistent with the redevelopment goals of Beach by Design as well as the vision of the document's Retail and Restaurant District and Design Guidelines. The proposed redevelopment constitutes a classic example of urban infill redevelopment and supports this Policy. Objective A.6.6 - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base and as such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement of this important economic sector. The proposed redevelopment will serve tourists and locals alike contributing to a vibrant successful resort destination and supports this Objective. Policy A.6.8.3 - Where appropriate, development shall provide a sense of pedestrian scale on streets through minimal front setbacks, similar building heights, street trees and proportionality of building heights to street widths. The proposal includes a modest building 522 square feet in area appropriately scaled for the small property on which it will be located with a large outdoor dining area along Papaya Street and Poinsettia Avenue. The proposal also includes an outdoor cafe within the Poinsettia Avenue right-of-way adjacent to the subject site. The overall effect of the proposal will a pedestrian- scale restaurant similar is scope and scale to surrounding properties, consistent with the goals and vision of Beach by Design and the Retail and Restaurant District and supports this Policy. Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 8 of 16 4 C��.(�l 17 Rl�el Level II Flexible Develo ment lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P APP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION J a ."C:i� .. .. � Policy A.6.8.9 - Promote a variety of transportation modes such as walking, bicycling, ride sharing and mass transit to increase transportation choices and decrease dependence on the single-occupancy automobile. The proposal encourages the use of bicycles and walking as modes of transportation for potential customers through the provision of bike racks and by not providing on-site parking. Customers will need to use centralized public parking lots or on-street metered parking. This will result in getting cars off the street more quickly, encouraging walking and helping to reduce traffic congestion. It should be noted that the elimination of parking requirements for properties within the Retail and Restaurant District was recently added to the CDC. Therefore, the proposal supports this Policy. Community Development Code: The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code as follows: Section 1-103.B.1. Allowing property owners to enhance tlie value of their property through innovative and creative redevelopment. The property owner will remove an unattractive, outdated and inefficient duplex improving the site with a new attractive building, a vibrant use (restaurant with an outdoor cafe) and contribute to the public space with sidewalks between eight and 10 feet in width along Papaya Street and Poinsettia Avenue. Therefore,the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties and wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding properties. Surrounding properties are generally developed with retail sales and services, offices, restaurants, attached dwellings and overnight accommodations. The proposed restaurant will constitute an appropriate use for the neighborhood and is a targeted desired use within the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design. Surrounding properties will be enhanced through the addition of a use which will contribute to an active and vibrant street life. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.B.3. Strengthening the city's economy and increasing its tax base as a whole. The proposal includes the removal of an outdated attached dwelling use and replacing it with a new restaurant and outdoor cafe within the Poinsettia Avenue public right-of-way. The new restaurant is expected to create six new jobs thereby positively contributing to the City's economy and its t�base. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.D. It is the further purpose of this Development Code to make the beautification of the city a matter of the highest prioriry and to require that existing and future uses and structures in the city are attractive and well-maintained to the maximum extent permitted by law. The proposal includes a new attractive building characterized by a mix of tropical bungalow vernacular with elements of traditional Key West-style of architecture including a metal standing seam roof and board and batten siding. Most of the site will be dedicated to a patio containing the majority of the restaurant's dining area. The remainder of the site's seating will be located within a 500 square foot outdoor cafe within the Poinsettia Avenue right-of-way along the east side of the site. Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 9 of 16 • ° p�� } PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT : C Vµl 17�1��Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOPMENT REVfEW DIVISION G .,,i�� u, . This proposal meets the required minimum five-foot wide building foundation landscape area along Papaya Street. The applicant has provided perimeter plantings approximately five feet in width along the remainder of the north side of the site as well as the west property line. A landscape buffer is also provided along a portion of the south side of the site. The site will be planted with palm trees (Mexican Washingtonian and Royal Palms), accent trees(crape myrtle and w� privet), shrubs (hibiscus, sage and ixora) and ground .covers (India hawthorn, lantana and beach sunflower). Therefore,the proposal supports this CDC Section. Section 1-103.E.S. Preserve the natural resources and aesthetic character of the community for both the resident and tourist population consistent with the city's economic underpinnings. The proposal will support both the resident and tourist populations with a new restaurant, eight- to 10-foot wide sidewalks along Papaya Street and Poinsettia Avenue and an outdoor cafe. The proposal will be consistent with regard to the desired form and function of the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design and meets the Design Guidelines of that document. Therefore, the proposal supports this CDC Section. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Floor Area Ratio 1.0 0.187 3� Impervious Surface 0.95 0.80 X Ratio Minimum Lot Area N/A 2,787 square feet(0.064 acres) Xl Minimum Lot Width N/A 60 feet X Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A North: 5 feet(to building) X' 3.5 feet(to patio) East: 26 feet(to building) X� 3.25 feet(to patio) Side: N/A South: 6 feet(to building) X' 0.75 feet(to patio) West: 7.9 feet(to building) X� 0.75 feet(to driveway) Maximum Height N/A 12 feet (from BFE to midpoint of X the highest roof structure) Minimum N/A Zero pazking spaces X� Off-Street Parkin � See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 10 of 16 Y C�\.N�l l7alel Level II Flexibie Develo ment lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P APP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION u �xy,�„,:� . .. . . COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent Inconsistent l. T'he proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage,density and chazacter of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual,acoustic and olfacto and hours of o eration im acts on ad'acent ro erties. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. T'he development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning wouid result in a spot land use or zoning designation;or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 11 of 16 � ��.iil n�Le�Level II Flexible Development Application Review PLnr��xG&DEV�LOPMErrr DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION y .. N '3',: . � � � Consistent Inconsistent 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging chazacter of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters,porticos,balconies,railings,awnings,etc.; 0 Variety in materials,colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks;and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landsca e desi and a ro riate distances between buildin s. COMPLIANCE WITH OUTDOOR CAFE CRITERIA Consistent Inconsistent 1. Outdoor cafes are restricted to the sidewalk frontage of the subject business applying X for a permit, except that outdoor cafes located within the Cleveland Street Caf� District may extend the linear distance of any adjacent business frontage, in accordance with the provisions of section 3-909.D.10. 2. A minimum of one unobstructed pedestrian path at least five feet wide shall be X maintained at all times. Within the Cleveland Street Caf�District the path shall abut the building faqade. 3. All furnishings shall be of good design and made of quality materials. X 4. No furnishing shall be chained or attached to any tree,post,sign or other fixture. X 5. No furniture shall be permitted within the sight visibility triangle as required by the X Community Development Code.Furniture shall not be placed within four feet of bus stops,telephone booths,fire hydrants,or counter service windows or within two feet of any entrances and/or exits. 6. Outdoor cafes pursuant to Section 3-909.A.1.d, above, are restricted to sidewalk X frontage of the subject business applying for a permit and may extend no more than 25 feet from the fa�ade of the subject business. Under no circumstances may any portion of an outdoor cafe extend into or obstruct any portion of the main pedestrian thoroughfare(promenade)of Beach Walk.In addition,access to outdoor cafes from the public right-of-way shall be limited to no more than one entranceway. The perimeter of outdoor cafes shall be clearly delineated through the use of self- supporting fencing and/or landscape planters and/or other such devices and methods as presented to and approved by the city. 7. Any area in which an outdoor caf� is permitted shall be clearly delineated on a X drawing accurately depicting the area and specifically delineating where alcohol beverage sales are intended to occur. Such a drawing shall be submitted to and approved by the city as part of a minimum, flexible standard or flexible develo ment a lication,as a licable. Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 12 of 16 � C�e[�1 11�1.4�Level II Flexible DevelopmentApplication Review DEVEL Po MErrr�v�wnMESiox � , .. COMPLIANCE WITH BEACHBYDESIGNDESIGN GUIDELINES Consistent Inconsistent 1. Section A:Density. N/A� 2. Section B:Height. X 3. Section C:Design,Scale and Mass of Buildings. X 4. Section D:Setbacks. X 5. Section:Street-Level Fa�ades. X 6. Section F:Parking Areas. N/A� 7. Section G:Signage. X� 8. Section H:Sidewalks. X 9. Section I:Street Furniture and Bicycle Racks. X 10. Section J:Street Lighting. N�AI 11. Section K:Fountains. N�A' 12. Section L:Materials and Colors. X � See analysis in Sta�'f Report SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of November 1, 2012, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 0.064 acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of Papaya Street and Poinsettia Avenue; 2. That the subject property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High(RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the subject property is located in the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design; 4. The subject property is comprised of one parcel with approximately 60 feet of frontage along Papaya Street and 50 feet of frontage along Poinsettia Avenue; 5. The parcel contains two attached dwellings within a one-story building; 6. The proposal is to construct a 522 square foot restaurant with all seating located outdoors including 80 seats on the subject site and an additional 28 seats located in an outdoor cafe within the Poinsettia Avenue right-of-way adjacent to the subject site; 7. The proposed building height is 12 feet from the Base Flood Elevation(BFE)to mid-point of the highest roof structure; 8. The proposal includes zero parking spaces; 9. The proposal includes a front (north) setback of 3.5 feet(to patio) and five feet (to building), a front(east) setback of 3.25 feet (to patio) and 26 feet(to building), a side (south) setback of 0.75 feet (to patio), 0.5 feet (to service driveway) and six feet (to building) and a side (west) setback of 0.5 feet(to service driveway) and 7.9 feet(to building}; Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 13 of 16 � C�LUl 17�1e1 Levei II Fiexible Development Application Review DEVELO�MENT�REVIEW DI¢VIS ON � ..;.:.��z. .. . . 10. The proposal includes a six foot sidewalk along Papaya Street and a 15 foot sidewalk along Poinsettia Avenue consistent with the Design Guidelines provided by Beach by Design; 11. The proposal includes a bike rack to be located within the public right-of-way along Poinsettia Avenue (specific location of which as well as installation methodology, style, fit and finish to be approved by and coordinated with City Staf fl; and 12. There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: l. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2- 803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 803.0 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 3-909. Outdoor cafes located within public right(s)-of-way of the Community Development Code; 5. That the development is consistent with the General Purposes of the Community Development including Sections 1-103.B, D and E.S; 6. That the development is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan including Policy A.3.2.1, Objectives A.5.5, A.6.1 and A.6.6 and Policies A.5.5.1, A.6.4.1, A.6.8.3 and A.6.8.9; 7. That the development is consistent with the Retail and Restaurant District of Beach by Design; and 8. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a Restaurant use of 522 square feet in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 2,799 square feet; lot width of 60 feet; a front (north) setback of 3.5 feet (to patio) and five feet (to building), a front (east) setback of 3.25 feet (to patio) and 26 feet (to building), a side (south) setback of 0.75 feet (to patio), 0.5 feet (to service driveway) and six feet (to building); a side (west) setback of 0.5 feet (to service driveway) and 7.9 feet (to building) and to delay the undergrounding of adjacent overhead utilities until such time as adjacent parcels are redeveloped, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2-803.0 and to permit a 500 square foot, 28-seat outdoor cafe located within the Poinsettia Avenue right-of-way under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-909 subject to the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: General/Miscellaneous Conditions 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 2. That any freestanding signs be limited to the minimum permitted by the CDC with regard to area, height and number; Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 14 of 16 9 C�4ul 1'��Lel Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVEL MENTREVIEW DMS ON � � 3. That issuance of a development permit by the City of Clearwater does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the City for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law; 4. That fences greater than three feet in height be specifically prohibited along any adjacent street; , 5. That all irrigation systems be connected to the City reclaimed water system where available per Clearwater Code of Ordinances, Article IX., Reclaimed Water System, Section 32.376. Reclaimed water lines are available in the Poinsettia Avenue and/or Mandalay Avenue rights-of-way; and 6. That all other applicable local, state and/or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development. Outdoor Cafe Conditions 7. That a11 requirements of CDC Section 3-909.D be met prior to the issuance of any permits for the outdoor cafe. Timing Conditions 8. That application for a building permit be submitted no later than December 18, 2013, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407; 9. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the sidewalk and any associated sidewalk amenities be installed to the satisfaction of City Staff along Papaya Street and Poinsettia Avenue; 10. That prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy that all required Transportation Impact Fees be paid; 11. That prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all service lines onto the property sha11 be installed underground; 12. That adjacent overhead utilities will be relocated underground when either adjacent property is redeveloped but such undergrounding will be limited to the utilities along the street where such redevelopment is occurring; 13. That prior to the issuance of any building permits the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be shown to be painted the same color as the portion of the building to which such features are attached; 14. That prior to the issuance of any permits, any applicable Public Art and Design Program Impact Fees be paid; 15. That prior to the issuance of any permits, any applicable Parks and Recreation impact fees be paid; 16. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150 percent of its rated capacity; Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD2012-10017—Page 15 of 16 � V�ec1� 1"►c�le�Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVEL MENT REVIEW DI¢VIS ON � ��:::>,:.�:^y . .. 17. 'That prior to the issuance of any building permits, evidence be submitted to and approved by Staff which indicates that the proposed dumpster will meet the requirements of NFPA-1, 2009 edition by providing a one-hour separation and a fire sprinkler system for the protection of the structure. Such evidence will be required to have been designed by a fire protection engineer in addition to the architect of record detailing the one hour rating of the area in question; 18. That prior to the issuance of any permits all sub-standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be shown on plans to be improved to meet the requirement of Local, State and/or Federal standards including A.D.A. requirements (truncated domes per FDOT Index#304). 19. That prior to the issuance of any permits all improvements as specified by City Staff shall be made at the intersection of Papaya Street and Poinsettia Avenue; 20. That prior to the issuance of any permits, a site plan, accompanied by a vault maintenance schedule, signed and accepted by the owner, which provides stormwater vault specifications indicating that the vault provides water quality benefits is submitted to and approved by City Staff; 21. That prior to the issuance of any permits a grading and drainage plan is submitted which provides for City Staff-acceptable levels of stormwater attenuation and that the design of the on-site stormwater facility satisfactorily meets the six-inch freeboard requirement provides a six-inch vertical clearance between seasonal high water table and the bottom of the rock layer and ensures that the entire quality and attenuation volume shall percolate within 24 hours or less; and 22. That prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of the General Engineering, Stormwater Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Fire Departments be addressed. Sidewalk Conditions 23. That the final location of the sidewalks along Papaya Street and Poinsettia Avenue be consistent with the plans approved by the CDB or as otherwise determined/required by City Staff; and 24. That the fit, finish, materials, installation methodology of the sidewalk and any associated sidewalk amenities (such as benches,trash receptacles,trees, lighting), as the case may be, be coordinated with and approved by City Staff prior to the issuance of any permits. __---� Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Mark T. Parry,AICP,Planner III ATTACHMENTS:Existing Sunounding Uses Map and Photographs Community Development Board—December 18,2012 FLD20l 2-10017—Page 16 of 16 /// � . /// I ) .// � r \l— 1 � -�•= / i % �� . d1'�� , � - � � t �, '. _ � i ' . �� i '�i" ^-� - 1 � �` .. - .. � -� �� ,. . �� , .__. .,:;. 1 . .. -:�.. �� . ' .,.-w'_. C � � � t , ` � ' _ �{ ,�� 'I � 1 i _ __- _ .- -� �. \ �. -.`' �"� - . - _ i—_ _ _ �;�� . � .. t_ ' ..� , ' - � _.. " . ��q � �`~� - . .. � .,.I .� ,.. �•'. ., . � I �;��I�in� �iA ai �ni��r,�r�i�m ol Papa�a:ir��' ' � .� .��;i�i Looking�F,fr�mi I'n��a�a n�ur��1� rorncr ul�;iir 1 � .tePti,nc��pi• � � � � t�r�•. ��di��' ' � �� o, �I �� ° �, � �� :�a�ar}{��,�1�- � � ��.� �ii� �� ,�,i, , I� ppBq� j. ii °.Z' i � � � , .•++�..�.....;iyi �':. - �' ( �'r �. � �i �� :\11 � .. � ' 9 1 � �. I ,. � '�', _. il a�i �, i �1: J{.+I � i +'„ ,.-� :,i� � .�•",�. I ':.-. ! U�� ''�.- I� r � � �1�� . � � _ �r-". ' j .!', �1 %' l � __ i�` ��s-,. �''� l{ '� � ,P■ !�` �; ��3 0�l. , �.: . -,� ':,l �;. -;_� �� - � .� ��; ,j�, LL5� ;' ; _ '%., '. . , �.. - - , � � - ;� �� '� _ - � � .� 3„ .. . . _ i. , ' � T'� .`��.. �.�- �,��'.� . . �j�.��q�,�.S�,l . y vj jJ� 5 I I 1� . --.. i''�:1 . ...:�'� �5:',. � � _ � .��- .� .:r:�� \`�,. _. ,� ':� __.__._ . -._.. � ' �.; , � � v ti-- --_. ' . I f*J_�`-^ r.. _ . •.4, i �K:�. �;h J. , ,_. .. .. ,. .,.,, . ; ,,��L �.uuking S at NE corner of sitr �, , - ; --_- �p /f ' c. . _ �_ „�.�M�*, , � . :� ---�. -- .---' � ' �f "�r ��. _ - ��7 ��'ii ., = �hl� - --- � , � .-`�� r� .�. ,•f. �.o{ '._ - � ... I . k !�� ,. : �/ '��' F ��--i. ` �. �i ��"c. -1:t' . . . .. ' _ ■a�• �� . . � � � �� _� ��YYY + �.. • �i� .� . ` �� .... . � ..=a� . � ,.� - ., . . ti �� , -_ • . !; ..,. .,-Tl t � '' ��R/ _ . .._ -_ . . �+�---�„ - -- � . ,.�..,,. . .—_ . .... __"_ ._. .. '..'._,,, _..� ,_.��_...� � ... __ . . .:.._ __.� � _... �"�� .,,:: '4:_'�''"-"`'�..�:,�� ¢ II�� r� •�� I ��d4iF��''!�`i,� x ,� � i'�III j � � � �.:�,, � �� - . - � i '„�„,,.,;� . �,y. ' � ,� .. Lookin� ��l Ii��m Poui�cllla ncai SF c��rncr of;itc Lu��kine�b� tinm P��inse�tia 45 PAPAYA STREET FLD2012-10017 � 456 • 79 � _451 - -2 - - - - - - � M 1 452 454 M ra � $� 45T � 449 - �• � 3 � 450 Q � � 1� 2C ai - - - - - 454 � ��$ � � � 81 � 2 z — �0 4a� �2_ - - - -19 � Z - - 83 � _aas _ _18 � - -14 MOTEL �e � F — 1 - — — — — � 0 84 N � _ _ _ RESTAURANT 15 W �i - or- +pr �� lll ATTACHED �o �a3 0 85 DWELLINGS � RE5TAURANT 4 � ' �� F � W A C7 2 z a3s 3 U � - - � V � ��- - - - - .. �z W > 2 � H3 RETAIL PLAZA Q d A 430 429 CJ 1 Q - - - - - - - — - - —► 40 y ass � w 3 427M�r - � � E,,,� � - - - - 7 N 39 4 � z - � - - Q g � ua o � 423- - - - a - - - - - - E W � Q - - - -��- � 38 "'' 5 d1A y 5 � _ 11 a z Q z _ N 12 37 � ; 6 W � U 4 a — — — � � — — 13 36 � 4sz 7 a, a 14 A � 7 - ao: F i 1 � — oc a 8 (� 40: �V � W 4 $ v $ H 4es,� _17 _ ,► � � a» 9 — — aoa _ 18_ _ 34 � � 9 4os — — N - - - EXISTING CONDITIONS Owner: John and Christina Pimenidis Case: FLD2012-10017 Site: 45 Papaya Street Property Size: 0.064 acre site PIN: 08/29/15/02592/001/0421 Atlas Page: 267A MARK T. PARRY 1655 Linwood Drive Tel: (727) 742.2461 Clearwater, FL 33755 E-mail: mparry@tampabay.rr.com SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS A dedicated, AICP certified professional Planner focused on contributing to the field of Urban Planning experienced in public and private sector planning. An excellent communicator, able to effectively interact with clients, local government officials and business professionals at all levels. Experienced in various aspects of urban design and planning, zoning regulations and permitting. OBJECTIVE To secure a Planning position which will allow me to continue improving the built environment and my community through sound and innovative planning and design principals. EDUCATION COOK COLLEGE, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, New Brunswick, NJ B.S. Landscape Architecture Major, Urban Planning Certification B.S. Environmental Planning and Design Certificate Urban Planning Golden Key Nationa/Honor Society; Sigma Lambda Alpha American Planning Association (Florida Chapter); member AICP#020597 40-hour OSHA (Hazwoper) Training EXPER/ENCE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, CITY OF CLEARWATER 04/12 - Present 08/98—04/05 Lead Planner; Senior Planner/Acting Development Review Manager • Responsible for nonresidential and single/multi-family site plan review and permitting. • Assist in the implementation and subsequent review of the Community Development Code. • Responsible for assessing and writing Community Development Code amendments. • Land Development Code development, interpretation and application. • Provide, inspect and direct landscape review/design. • Acting Development Review Manager 9/99— 11/99 and 01/05—03/05. . Manage and direct Associate Planners. . Review, process and present variance/conditional use, land use/zoning atlas amendment and annexation applications at in-house and public review meetings. • Principle Planner in creating and implementing Clearwater's Downtown Design Guidelines. Assisted in the implementation and application of the Clearwater powntown Redevelopment Plan. DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, CARDNO TBE 04/05—04/12 Senior Planner • Planner of record for Cities of Indian Rocks Beach, Seminole and Clearwater and Town of Belleair. • Responsible for nonresidential and single/multi-family site plan review and permitting. • Perform site design and inspections. • Provide technical planning support for engineering department. . Provide support for Zoning Code, Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Land Use Plan amendments. • Research and write Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. • Create and update Special Area Plans/Form-based Codes. • Provide CADD support. • Assist with creating redevelopment marketing material. • Perform technical environmental services including soil and groundwater sampling. GREENSCAPES-GLD, MARLBORO, NJ 9�92—6�9$ Designer/Owner • Founded and established a local garden and landscape business. • Plan and oversee installation of commercial and residential landscaping projects utilizing a variety of CADD and photo-manipulation programs. . Develop and implement advertising programs, brochures and graphics. • Estimate, bid and negotiate jobs. • Source and negotiate purchase of materials and equipment. • Manage, train and schedule installation crews. LONGSTREET FARM, MONMOUTH COUNTY PARK SYSTEM, HOLMDEL, NJ 6/87 - 8/93 Program Supervisor • Assisted in formulating and running children's summer program ("Hayseed"). • Created and coordinated daily programs and schedules for 6-9 year old groups. • Supervised several other programs throughout the year. • Created a demand which was twice the program's capacity after the first year. COMPUTER SKILLS Access, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Works, ClarisWorks, MS Word, Land Designer Pro, Permit Plan, Excel, Cornerstone, AutoCADD, PowerPoint, Publisher ... tS. - ;� " . 5��. . � , � �_� � i¢ � ti � � ,__ � .. 4"r_....�. a_ .- f ... � -'�,',:�' .F . .. � 4. Civil Engineer+ng,Land Planr�ing Permitting, Landscape Design November 8,2012 Mr. Mark Parry, Planner ill Gity of Clean+vater Planning 8 Development Review Departmen� 10U South Myrtle Avenue, Ciearwater, Fi 33756 (727) 5f:2-4567 Re: IcMeewawa—45 Papaya 8treet, Clearwat�r, FI Response to DRC Comments for Case Number�LD2012-1d017 Dear Mr. Parry: Enclosed please find{15)fifteen revised sets of documentation addressing camments issued during the Developmen#Review committee in anticipation of moving fo�nra�d with Communiiy Development Board review. Listed befaw is a copy of each comment as issued by the city with the design teams'appropriate response belQw_ !f you have any questions or concerns pfease contact us at 727-488-1Q02. Best Regards,,,.� 'w-'/� //� :- �f� , ' f: ._. _ .�� _ . � �- ,� --- Richard Marcet, LEED AP+ BD-�-C 727�t8$-1002 10l3012012 1 �RC Comm�nts ;,,g��-t ;�,�� '�j�''.`= � I �i �r �.� F � � L� ,L 7►. A� Y� 1`�►e "�, E R v� •Cy. •, �C� � 1,Si�r,.�4 () F e��til\ �)il ? "1J�."�F �r�4+c �� F� •; S.IF`11 ' 3��+A 3 E5. Z f +4i1 �f� ! -� �i 1`,�- �� ^ Q�� ! 1� �'s.. �G4'G,�` j�r .�� 1 �E::�u � �=' ii : , �UEi \��32iiSf�3�:z ��I ., l.?;3f �rlf;, �.n,t ��}�lT -��rEa- � , _ _ . . - `'�+I1I�f4� �.J:•�:�.�,i f.^_'�l�t)�•il;� � ..�,t,'_�)�t�� }� (t 90:35 AM Case number: �LD2012-10017--45 PAPAYA ST Owne�(s): Pir►�enidis, John H & Christina Revacabie Trust 6122 River Raad New Port Richey. FL 34652-2515 PHONE: No phvne, Fax: No fax, Email: Nfl emai� Appiicant: Pimenfdis, John H &Ch�is �122 River Road New Port Richey, FL 34652-2516 PHONE: No phone. Fax: Na fax, Emai(_ No email Representative: Alex Azan 4124 Headsail Dr New Port Richey, F� 34652 PHONE: 727�881(�02, Fax: 7273734262, �mail: Aixazanfa�t.t�maii.�orrt Loaatian: The 0,064 acre site is located at the southwest comer of Papaya Street and ?o'rnse�ia Avenue. Atlas Page: 267A Zvning District; Tourist Reque�t: Fiexible Development applicatian ta permit a Restaurant use of 522 sguare feet in the Tounst(T) District with a lot area of 2,799 square feef; lot width of 60 feet; a front(nor#h}setback of 3.5 feet(to pafiv)and five fe�t(ta building�; a front(east} setback of 3.25 feet(ta patia} and 26 Feet(to building), a side�south)setback of 0_?5 feet(to patio). ti.5 feet(#o d�iveway) and six feet lta building j: a side(west} setback of 0.5 f+�et(to servic�driveway) and 7,8 feet(to building)and ta delay the undergrounding of adjacent overhead uti{ities until such time as adjacent parcels are redeveloped, as a Comprehensive Infiii Redevelppment Project, under the provisions of C�mmunity Development Cade Section 2-803.0 and#o permit a 500 square foot, 28-seat outdoor cafE located with�n the Poinsettia Avenue right-af-way under the provisions of Community Development Code�ection 3-909. Proposed Use: Restaurants Neighborhvvd Clearwater Beach Associatian Associatian(s}: Prese�ter: Mark Parry, Pianner Ili 10/30/2012 2 DRC Camments The DRC reviewed this application wlfh the following comments: Engineering Review Pr+or to Community Qevelopment Board: 1. Please�aordinate with Rob Pawers on a grease trap for the project site_ Contact Rob Pawers(phone 727-462-666Q x227) in Industrial Pretreatment for details and praper sizing of grease traps. a. The slie of the grease/nterceptor has been cvordinated with Mr. Powers aad sr`zed approprietely. Or►Sheet G6, the pJans have beea revfsed to depict a Trapzilla TZ-640 w;th a rafe capacfiy of�5Q GPM. Pri�r to Building Construction Permi#: 1.Applicant shap bring all sub-standard sidewalks and sidewaik ramps adjacent ta or a part of the project up to standard, 'rncluding A.D.A, standarcis {raised detectable tac�tile surtaces or truncated domes per�C)OT Index#304j. a. Acknvw/edged and will be imp/emenCed during building construction ret�tew. 2.As per Cornmunity Developrr�ent Code Section 3-19�S.B-UtilitiesGeneraily, ali utility �acitities existing and proposed throughou#the property served or to be served shall be shown on the construction improvement plans. Piease p�ovide th�following notes on the plans: —All utilities shalf be cut and capped prior to demalition. The Wastewater Supervisor shall tre notified. a. On sheet C3, Utlllty Dem�lFtion Notes have been addeat fo the p/arrs. —All existing utilities shall lae protected during demolition. a. On sheet C3', Utiliiy Demolftian Notes have besn added to the plarts. —DemoGtion shal!not cause any service interruptians for other utility customers. a. 0�sheef C3, Utilnty 8emoliti�n A/ates have bee�added ta the p/ans. --Water meters, double-detectar checks and backflaw prever►ters are owned by the Ci#y of Clearwater. The City shall remove and retain these items. a. On sheet C3, ihe fext leader hes 6een mod�ed to read"City af Clean+vater UtiJity DepaKment to Relocate and remove....." Prior ta Receipt of Certifi�ate of Occupancy: 1. The applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and s�aied by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. a. Acknowledged �enerai Not�: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Pertnit Review. Additional comments may be fo�fh�oming upon submitta#ofi a Building Permit Application. a. �fcknowledged. Environmentai Review Genera) t�atelsl 9. DRC review is a prerequisite for 8uilding Permit Review, additianal comments may be forthcoming upon submittaf of a Suilding Permit Appiication. a. Acknow/edged. 2.An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to canducting any demolition or renovations. Contact Pineilas County Air Quality {727;4&4-4422}fo�more informatian. a. On sheet C3 under Genera/Notes, ftem#2 h$s been added ro fhe p/ans tnstructing the contractor appropriate/y. 3. Prior to issuancs of building permi#, provide stomz water vault specifications shawing the vault provides water quality benefits and pravide a vault maintenance sched�le that has been signed and accepted by tlie owner. a. Acknowrlsdged and will be submitted prior to iasuance of building permit Fire Revi�w 1} Show location of fire hydrant for fiireflghting use. Must be within 3pp' of buitding as hose lays and on same side of street as building. PRIOR TO CDB a. On sheet C6 a h�e laying lengrh from the proposed hydrant and typical hydiant coverage has been added to the ptans. The proposed fire hydrant is depicted on the norfh slde af Papaya due to ex/sfing utiJiry infrastructure on the south-slde of Papaya. This was dlscussed during the origina/pre-appllcallon meeting.A hose layfng lenqth of 743LF is depicted frarr�the hydrant to southeas#comer of the bullding.Also,on su6sequent sheets the exJs�ing fire frydrant at tlte intersecfion of Papaya and Mandalay Avenue has 6aen depicted with a break/ine. The utlllty plan has bsen revised to depict"contractor ta in�taf!hXdrani durin�demoliUan phase"for e�cfra prote�tfoR. 2) Must meet the requirement of FAC 69A60 Fiorida Fire Prevention cade to instaA signage at entry doors to identify if this building has been corstructed with ligh#weight truss floor and roof systern You may contact fhis office fior a copy o#details at 727-552-4327 X 3462, Add note to cover sheet of plan showing intent PRIOR TO CDB a. A Fire signage note has been added to tfre cvver sheet as requested. 3) Plan shows 4 yard roli-out dumpster Must meet the requirements of NFPA- 1. 20Q9 editian Chapter 19 19.2.1,4 Rubbish Within Dumpsters. Dumpsters and containers with an individuat capacity of 1.5 yd3 [40.5 it3(1.15 m3}]or more shall n�t be stored in buildings or pfaced within 14 ft{3 m} of combustible wails, openings, or cpmbustible root eave lines. 19.2.1.4.1 Areas containing dumpsters or containers shalt be protected by an approved automatic sprinki�r system and enclflsed with a fire resistance rating of 1 hvur_ 19.2 1 4.2 Structutes of Types! and li fire-resistive construction used for dumpster or contain�r storage shall be iocated not less than 1Q ft(3 m}ftom openings and oth�r buildings.ACKNOWLEDGE PRlOR TQ CD8 On Sheea`C6 a 1"�fre service tine with backflow dev/ce has besn depicted tar fire prviecffon of tlte dumpster encfasure a�ea.An autornaGe spnnkler devlce sha!!be rnstalfed infema/ty and wil!6e submifted dur�ng bullding revraw by a Fire Protection En�ineer 1br appnc�va/, �) " Note: This is a D_R.C.apprQVa! Qnly. Other issues may develop and will be addressed at buikling permit stage such as cooking equi�ment, hoods, fire suppression, emergency lighting, fire extinguishers �. Ackaowledged. Land Resource Review Land Resaurce Review: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite fnr Buikiing Permit Revierv, additional comments may be fortficaming uRon submittal af a Buikting Permit Apptication. a. Acknawledged. Pianning Review General S�te Plan and Appfication Comments 7. Clarify the haurs of operatian and where employees are anficipated to park. a. The narra#ives are rsevised appropriateJy,which incJudes hours af operation a»d employee transportationlparkfng to and from wark. 2. Provide elevatians alang aIl sides of the sifie. a. Encloaed are revtsetl eievations far aU sides of the building. 3. Clarify that only two shades af grey are proposed for the building-na accent cofors or trim cvlors. Grey on gre�+is not consistent with the color palette in Beach by Design. Please revise the colour scheme#o meet the requirements of Beach by Design. a. Enclused please see �svisad architectural renderings along with prapased calors. 4. Include landscaping directly at the corner bf Papaya and Poinsettia - this area is just left blank. a. The landscapa p/an is revised ta depict Per,ennial Pe�anut grass Inste�d of sod. 5. Remove and�eplace the Miamasty(e fwo-foot curb alon�the streets with a standard six-inch curb in order to provide as mueh sidewa(k width as possihle. a. During DRC i#was discussed with staff#hat Ure existfrrg curbing would remain as-is due b storm water concerns. 6. Clarify if signage is proposed at ttfis time. Please keep in mind that signage will have to meet the requirements of Code. a. SlgRage is pr�posed, but wil�be submitte�f under separate cover far approval. 7. Indicate wher�e one nr bike racks wili be located. a. �n shee#C4 a remo+rable tritan(6 bikeJ powdere+d coated rack is depicted,wh3ch can be removed and/orstored on-slte ifneeded or at tire city's ieques� 8. The sight visibifity triangle is drawn a big too large-if ihe dashetf iine is intended to be the edge of khe�riangle. The shown edge o##he patio is the true edge of the sigh#visibil�ty triangle. The triangle, as rlrawn, runs through a porfion of the pativ. To be clear, th� patio is drawn outside the true sight visibility triangie. a. The site visibility frrang/e has been r+ev;sed to dep►cf o»ty 20' (not 22.4'},A/1 proposed dinfngr areas and fencing w111 remain o�fside the s+ght visibility triangle. 9. Has the provisian of some sort of covering besn discussed?It is recarnmended that either remvvable or permanent coverings vf some sort be provided. This is not a Code requirement-�ust a suggestion. a. A cam4jnatfon of table with umbrel/as and pa/m pl�nt;ngs wi!) create a shaded area for patrons. 10. The Mro ptanters+n the center af the patio area would be ideal spots for sFrade trees or specimen paim. a. We are proposing to prvvide severa!talJer, fu11,and shading spaclmen palms to be planted wlthln the seafing areas. The /andscape p/an will be revised appn�riatei}r upan resubmission. 11. Clarify the materials of al�fences, a. T/te�enci»g, as showrr on the appt►cation drawings,is to be a 10/30t2012 5 DRC Camments 6ambov fence wiih large 4"fv 6"diameter prfmary uprights,4" p/us diameter horitonta!ralfs,and%"pickets groe�ped in iwos and threes and spacas approxlrnately 4"apart. The Gates are proposed tr�be built in fhe same fashi�n. 12. C�arify the materiat of the gate at the northwes#comer of the site for the service driveway. e. The Service Alsle Gate is to be bulli in the same fashion as the fencing but the plckets wip be tfghtly spaced to fully sh/e/d the service aisie from public view. 13 1n the T zoning di5tric#, brick or other masonry walls ar walis with masonry columns linked by substantial grill w�rk shalf be permitted to a ma�cimum height of six feet in a required frant setbacic. Clarify the heights and materiats of al{proposed fencesJwalls. 14. Please add a cantact narne ta the applicant far Agent or Representative. a. The apptication has been rsvised to depict contact information of fhe company and representative. 15. How many new jobs are expected to be created by the new restaurant? a. There are 12 jobs anfici�ateat to be created. Please see revl$ed narrative for mar�e detarts. 16. Pravide details regarding the tabies and seats and any other items to be placed within the public righ#�f-way. a. See revised architec#uraf ret�dering and architectura!s�te p/an far phatos arrd deiails. 17. Clarify where mechanical equipment will be Iocated and how it will be screened. a_ Mechanical eqttfpment will be fixed to fhe building 8nd Is depicted o�the rev/sed architectural renderings. Plan�ing Review General Appficability Criteria Comments 18. Criferion 1 -Include a discussian of how, generally, the proposa! meets the Design Guidelines af Beach by Design. 19. Criteric�n 2-No camment. 20. Cnterion 3 -Talk more about the Iack of si�ewalks and haw the proposal will include sidewalks�long Papaya and Poinsettia. 21. Criterion 4-Suggest swinging the dfscussion to how parking is completely elimina#ed thereby eliminating traff�c cor�apletely. Keep the point about foot traffic, though and also the recent Code amendment eGminating the requirement fQr parking in the R�tail�nd Restaurant District. 22- Criterion 5- Perhaps mentian that the proposal meets ihe requi�ments ofi the Design Guide{ines pro�iding specific ex-amples. 23. Criterion C-Cla�fy what the haurs af operation wil! be. Mention that the use, a restaurant, is a desired use in this district. a. For items 18 tfrrvugh 23 above,please see rev;sed narratfves for each crrteria specified. Planning Review Cor�prehensive fnfill Redevelopment Criteria Comments 24. Criterion 1 -Mention when the properky was crea#ed (pre- 1999lcurrent adoption date). 25. Criterion 2 -No comments. 26. Criterion 3 -IVo comments. 27. Critenon 4-Perhaps talk about what the surrounding uses are- 28. Criterion 5-Na comments: 29. Criterion 6-Atlache�dwellings are no�necessarily nonconfarming uses. Yau may vrant to chanae your language to sta�that the existing residentiai use(s}are not supported by the vision of the Retail and Restaurant District. a. For ii�ems 24 thr4ugh�9 above,please see revlsed narratives far each critella spec�ed: Planning Review 8each by Des�gn, Design Guidelines 30. Provide fmages of the propased fencing, paving, etc.?The ane image provided indicates a nan-opaque fence about three fe$t in height where the site plan lists so(id fences six feet in height. The fencing alang ali street frontages wiU be fimited to three in height in arder to contribute tb a vibrant street life-ferrcing the ent�re use off wiih a soi+d fenc�six feet in F�eight is contrary to the spirit of 6each by Design. a. Please see revised architectural rende�ings et�ctosed with the resubmittal package. 31. Consider providing a water�afl featu�e in the seatEng area. a. A waterfatl feature will be implemented witho�t the outdoor seating area an�i is depicted on the landscape ptan sheet C8. Solid Waste Review The Dumpster area is not big envugh ta accammodate any of our Dumpsters. It needs#o be widened and made deeper wi#h some sor#of buffer ie. bollards. a. The dumRst�r enck�sure is adequa#e fo�the demand that the restaurant wtN produce. Roll-aut containers wf#t be maneuvered from the storage room tn staging area by restauraM staff fw collectian. Stormwat�r R�view The following shall be add�essed pridr to Corrtmunity Development Board: 1_ Please address storm water attenuatian req�i�ements besides water quafity requirement, a. Tha storm wgter managerrrent system will provide attenuatian in acc�rdance with City of Clearwater criteria. Regarding attenuation calculations�the City provides for 50%crcdtt of existing impervious area. 2. Please acknowledge in writing that the design wiil meet the failowing: a} 6" ireeboard requirement, b)6"veriical clearance between sea�onai high water table and the bottom of the rock layer, c; Entire quality and aftenuation volume shail percolate within 24 hours or fess. a. The requirements listed above will be met as part of the sto�m water system dssign. Genera!notes: 7. All resubmittals shall be accompanied with a response lett�r addressing how each departme�t condition has be�n met a. Acknowledg�d. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additionai comm�nts may be forthcaming upor+submittai of a Building Permit A�plrcation. a- Acknowledged. 3. Approvat from Sta�rnwater Divisian does not relieve the applicant from the obligation to obtain all other required perrrtits and au#harizations. a. Acknowledged. 10I30/2012 7 DRC Comments Traffic Eng Review Rrior ta GDB: 1. Pfease acknawledge in writing that objects inside the right-af-way shall be remaved at any time through the City of�learwabe�'s request i.e. fence railing, chairs, tables, etc. a. A/I adjects within fha City's rlght ot way sha/l be remevab/e and stared appropl�aCely on-site. 2. Acknowiedge in writing that the sidewalk shall be ADA campliant when fencetrailing posts are ren�oved from the right-of-way. a, Sidewa/k Improvements assaciated rrrfh the project shall be AQA cnmp/aint per federa!standarrls and cfty o�Clearwater Gvr�s#n►ctiorr Spec�cations. 3. Where wiil employees park? Please acknowledge in writing that the Tra�c Operations Di�ision does not a11ow on street parkis�g alang Papaya St ar Poinsettia Ave a. Locat residenis af C/earwater Beach wit/be errtpleyed and requlred to provlde an altemative mode of iransportation. lt is acknowfedged tlrat City of Gfearwater Tra�c Operations Divisian daes not a/lew street parking aJong Papaya Street or Poinsettia Avenue. As part vf empbyr»ent condiGons, empJoyees wftl be required to sign forrn stating they(empfeyee)are aware of Gifjr's no parkin�regWatiQns and agree to ab/de by same. And, as such they{employee)agree not#a street park a/ong the aforementianed roadways. Pfease see revr`sed narratives for comp/ete defails. Genera{Note{5): 1 Applicant shatl cvmply with the current TransPortation Impact Fee Ordinance and f�e sct►edu(e and pay pr►ar to a Certificate of Occupancy(C.O.). a. ��knowledged. L. DR� review is a pr�requisite far Building Permit review; adrlitional comments may be forthcaming upon subm�ttal of a$uilding Permit Appiication. AcknowJedged. fJ �� Plann��g&Developtnent Department = � ai"�vat�r . . _ Flexable Dev�lopment Apphcatic�n Attached Dwellings, Mrxed-Uses or Non-Residentiat Uses IT 15 INCUMBENT UPON THE ARPUCAIdT TO SUBMiT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFQRMATION. ANY M151EADiNG, DECEPTlVE, INCOMPIETE OR ItVCORRECT INFORMATIpIV MAY INVAIIDATE YOUR APPLtCAT(OIV. AU APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FlLLED DUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY,APID SUBMITTED IN PERSON(NO FA?(DR DELNERIES} TO THE PtANIVlNG&DEVEtAPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NODN ON THE SCHEDUIED QEADtlNE DATE. A TOTAL OF ii COMPLETE SETS OF PCANS�IND APPIiCATlOtV MATERIALS(1 ORiGINAL QND 10 COPlES}AS REQUIRE[3 WITHIN ARE TO 8E SUBMITTED FOR REVlEW BY THE pEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SIlBSEQUENT SUBMlTTAL FOR 7tif CaMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARp WILL REQUIR�15 CCIMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AIVD APPLiCAT101V MATERiALS tl QRiGf1YAL AND 14 CORiES}. PLANS AND APPIICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLAtfD,STAPIEQ AND FOLDED iNT�SETS. 'niE APPLICANT, BY fiUi� THIS APPUCATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH al� APPUC,48LE REQUIREMENiTS Oi 7HE COIVIMlJNITY OE5lELI�PMENT Cl1DE. FtRE DEPT PRELIMARY SiTE PLAW REVIEW FEE: $200 APPIttATION FEE: $1,2Q5 PROPERTf OWNER(PEft DEED�: pf��idES,John H and Christina Revocabl�Truat MAIL{NG ADDRE55: 51lY Rh►eF Road,New Part Richey,FI 3+{852-2545 DHOME NUMBER_ EMAII: AGENT OR REPRESEN7ATIVE; R;�},ard J Marco!ar Alex Azan w/The Sustairtability Graup,LLG MA1liNG aDDRE55: 4421 Madiaon Stree�guite 109,New Port Richey,F134$52 RH�NE IVUMBECt: (P)727-I88-10a2(F)T27-643-5105 EMAIl: Richard�agroupfl.com � ADDRESS OF SU6IECT PROPER�v: �Papaya St.e�t,�Ig��r,F133767 PARCEI NUMBER{5j: p�28_i6-02592-OOa-Oa21 IEGA�.DESCRIPTtON: ��r�'=�sco�°a°oFa:,a�;R-?�tC�RR6ttSU[ivi�tStG> +�C�[�Rqf;yG;p1HEp�.�tix�p��p��;�p�A1�WK,3.P:1GE-t:. AF{1ti AT Tilt!YOFLlH N�h-y[L�OR.'ti'ER OF�-►kD LIYf•\��rZLSti F�STERLY.4LQ}:(r I:1E NURTI$RLt`LIN@ 1HFltF.nF i�1 pF,ET IIIitiCC lell17 F..(7i.TF.E.*iCE N'E.4TFRI.Y RJ!A±FEET'O SLs7$GL�IHtL"tS�fERLY.r.4R`iER THPh`C'F 1bRT1t AL6hG ikE 4�'Fy7�;1.1��LiT'E OF S::ill L4T T(1 THE Pt11`'T OF f3FC,t�.�1T..iG PRQPQSED USE(5}: ��twf outdoorsearing DESCRIPTlON OF REQUEST: See Attachment"A" Specijrcally rdenrify the requesf (inz/ude oll requesreL+c��e jlexik�iliiy, -- e.g., reduc[;on rn regu�red number of parking spcces, i►eigh�, setbocks, tot sizP,lot width,sperific use,etc.): � Pianning b[isvelopment Departrnent,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tef:727-562-�S6T;Fax:TZ7-562-486b Page 1 of 8 Re�ised 42f12 } � �� , Planning& Development Department Flexible Development Appiication Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE F�LLOWING fNFQRMATION IS fILIED OUl', lIV iT5 ENTIRETY. FA11L1RE TO COMPLETE THtS FORM WiLI RESULT IN YQt1R APPLICATION BEING FOU(YD IrItOMPLETE AND P65518LY DEFERRED U{YTIL THE FOLLOWiIYG APPUCATtON CYCLE. ZONING DIS'rRiCT: 'T'Tourlst&Baach bv Oesit�n:RetaiURestaurant FUTIIEZE LAND USE Pt.AN DESIGNATiQN: "RFM"Resort Facilities High EXlS'fiNG USE{currently existing on site): Residential-0820{Ouplax,Triplex,Fourpl�x) PROPOSED liSE�new use,if any;plus existing,i�ta remain): R��urant w/144 Outdoor Dining{72 on-site+28 Poinsattla 8iti0walk} SlTE AREA: __ 2,7g9.26 sq.ft. p,06 acres 6RQ55 FIOOR AREA(totat square footage of all build+ngs�: Existing: 522,pa sq.ft. Proposed- _. sq.ft. Maximum A(lowable: sq.ft. GRO55 fLOOR AREA(tatal square footage devoted tv each use,If there will 6e muhiple uses�: First use: 522.40 sq.ft. 5econd use: sq,{�. Third use: s�.ft. FLOQR AREA RAT14�total square footage of alI 4uitdings divided tsy the totai square footage of entire srte): Existing: Proposed: Maximum Aliowabte: BUIIDING t01lERAGEJFOOTPRtNT(19 ftoor square fovtage of all buildings): Existing: �,656.2$ sq.ft. � 5�.16 %of Site} Proposed: 522.00 sq.ft. j 38.B4 %of site) Maximum Permitted: 2,659.?9 sq,k, ( 98.00 96 of sitej 6RfEN SPACE WITHtN VEHICl1lAR USE AREA(green space within the�arking lot and interior of site;not permeter buffer}: Existing: 0.00 5q.ft, ( 0 36 of site} Proposed: 0.0p sq.ft. f. 0 r�af site} VEHICULAR 11SE AREA{parking spaces,drive aisles,loading area): Existing: 0.00 sq.ft. { Q �6 of sitej Proposed� 0.00 sq.ft. ( p 96 of site) PlanMng 8 Qsvetopment Departrnont,100 S.Myrt1e Avenua,Clearwater,FL 337�6,Tvl:TZ7-562�567;Fax:72T�&2�d$66 Page 2 of 8 Revised o1H2 IMPERVl�DUS SURFACE R�TIO(totat square footage of impervious areas d�vided by the total aquare iootage of entire site): Existing: 9.822.28 sf t0.65 I3R) Proposed: Z,y3Q.40 sf(4.791SR} Maximum Permitted: 2,B�g,�g sf(4.95!�R) DEN5ITY(units,rooms or beds per acre): BUILDtNG 1iEiGHT: Existing: p Existing: Na Propased: 3 Proposed� 11'-8"ft(From 8FE=itA to Mid-Poitit of Roof} Maximum Permitted: 3 hlaximum Permitted: Sp•_Q^{�, OF�-STREET PARKING: Existing: .� Proposed: 0 Minimum Required� 0(Beach bv Oesign Retail 8 Re�urant District) WHAT IS 7HE ESTIMATEd TOTAL VAIUE QF THE PRQIECT UPUN COMPLETfON� $ � m�: ZONING bISTRICTS FOR Al!AQIACENT PROPERTY: North: "T'Tourist South: "T'Tourist fast: °T"Tourist ;+'Jest: �T`Tourist STATE OF FLQRIDA,COUNTY OF PiNELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this `-'"� ��` day of representations made in this appiication are true and � J accurate ta the best of my knowledge and authorize-� `�''��`'t ��' �� ' r -' 1 �- .ta me and/or by � Ciry representatives to visit and phatograph the �� ' : �-- s � ��'� . � r � ,wha is personalty known has j j property descri this application. � ' � � � produced �" , �� ' � �(�:k ►�,� as identification. ' � �� ,,' !�-�r �; i' 1(L dl+ S�:_`�4" - .�'�:C - C� i � ��.�J f��. ..j. � ... � r: . __ i.,�� '^'a,`." ," �✓L Signature of property owner or representativ�+ Nutary ublic, ^-.`- - My cQmrnission expires� } �:�, i � �` K�T9�INA MAVt� NOTARY PUBlIC STATE OF F�p�pq • ��#EE1599�7 Expires 1/22l2016 Planning d,Development Deparhrient,idti S.Mlyrds Avenue,Ci�arwater,FL 33T56,Tei:72T-6d2-d567;Fax:727-563-486v Page 3 of 8 Revised O1H� � Planning&Devetapment Department � � ear�ater - . . Flex�ble Development Applicatron " --��--' Site Flan Submittal Fackage C��l� list iN ADDITlON TO tHf COMPLETED FLEXtBIE DEVELOPMENT(FLD) APPLiCAT10N,ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCI.UDE A 5iTf PLAN SUBMiTTAL PACKRGE THAT fNCLt1DES THE FflLtOWING{NFQRMRTIaN AND/QR PLAMS: SI Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific u�c(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning Dist�itt�s) in which the subJect prope�y is locatea. The attached Flexibfe Development Application Flexibitity Criteria sheet shaU be usect to prvvide chese responses. I$1 Responses to the Genera)Appfticability cri#�ria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexlble Development Application General App(icability G�teria sheet shall be used#o provide these responses. � A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land suroeyar inciuding the location of the properiy, dimensio�s, acreage, location af all current strurtures!improvements, location of a!I public and private easements including official records book and pa�e numbers and street right{s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. � If the applicatian wauld result in the re�nova9 or rel�cation of mobife home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. §723.083,the application must prov+de that infa�mation required by Section 4-2QZ.A.S. �I ff this application is being submiited for the purp�s�of a baatlift,catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, Se�walf or other si milar marine structure, then the appticatinn must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bea;ing the seal and signature of the engineer,except signed and sealed plans shali not be required for the repair � replacement of decking, stringers, railing, tower landings, tie piles, or the patthing �r reinforeing of existing piling on private and cammercial dotks. � A site plan prepared by a professional architect,engineer ar landscape aahitect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a 5heet size not te exteed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the f�Hov�ing intormation: �I Index shect of the same size shall be included with individuaf sheet numbers referenced thereon. +"9 North arrow,scale,location map and date prepared. � Identifitatian of the boundaries of phases,if development is praposed t�be canstructetl in phases. ❑ lacation of the Caasta!Construction Contral line ,CCCL), whether the praperty is located within a 5petial Fiood Hazard Area,and the Base Fload Elevation(BFE)of the property,as applicable. �1 Location,footprint and size o#alf existing and praposed buiidings and structures on the site. �3 Latation and dimens+ons of vehicular and p�destrian circulation systems,both on-site and off-site, with proposed paints of access. � Location of all exist+ng and propased �idewalks,curbs, water Nnes, sanitary sewer (ines, storm drains, fire hydrants and seawalls and any prapased utility easements. 0 location of nnslta and offsite stormwater management facilitie> us �vel1 as a narrative descri6ing the propased stvrmwater cantrol plan inciuding calculations. Additional data necessary to demanstrate compiiance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building canstruction perrttit. � Locatfor�af salad waste collection faciiit�es,required screening and provisians for accessibility for collectian. � Locatian of aff-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406. � All adjacent right(s►-o#-way,with indication qf centerlirse and wiu2h, paved width,existing median cuts and inter�ections and bus sheiters. �] Dimensions of existing and propased !�t fines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, struetural overhangs and buiiding separations. � Buiiding or structure efevation drawings that depict the proposed building he�ght and bui(ding materials. Pfanning�pevelopment Oepartment,t00 S.Myrtie Avenue,Ciearwater,FL 337�6,Tet:727-562�4,i6T;Fax:737-5CZ-d865 Page 4 of 8 Revtsed D1/12 � Typica!floar piarts,induding floor plarts tor each floor of any parking gara$e. � Dpmotition plan. 5� identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, iree masses, specimen trees, and other enviranmentatty s2rsitiv�areas. '�!' If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the difference between the#op and bottom of the range is �ne parking space), then a parking demand study wil! need to be pruvided. The �rndings oF the study wiN he used in determining rnrhMher ar not deviations to the parking standards are approved.Please see the adopted Parking Demand 5tudy Guide(ines for iurther intormation. � A tree survey shawing the location, DBH a�d species of all existirtg trQes with a OBH of Pour +nches vr more,and identifying those trees prapased to be remaved, if any. � A tree in�entary, prepared by a certified arb�rist, of all trees four inches 09H or more that re#lects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicabfe by staff.Check with stafF. t� A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for alf propo;ed develapments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more of the follawing condiiions: ■ Proposal is expected t�generate 1fl0 or more new trips in any given haur(directional irips,inbo;�nd or outbound on the abutting stree#s)andjor 1,000 or more new trips per day;or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the Citv's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable ievels;or � The study area contains a segrnent of roadway and/or intersect+on with frve reportable accadents within a �rior#welve month period, or the segmer�t ac�d/or intersettion exisis on the City's annual list of most hazardous tocations, provided by the City of Clearwate�Police Department;�r ■ The TraffiC Qperations t�lanager �r their designee deems ii necessary ta require such assessment in the plan review prpcess. Exampfes inctude,developments that are expected to r�egatively impact a cQnstra�ned roadway or dev�lopments with unknown trip generation ahd/or other unknown factors. � A landscape plan shal�be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use;or an existing use is improved ar remodeled in a value of Z536 or rnore af the valuation of the prindpal structure 3s refiected on ihe property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required ta an existin� approved site plan; ar a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Artic±e 3,Division 14. The landscape pfan shall include the following in#ormation, if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for deveiopment approval� 82 lotation, size, descriptian, specificatians and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, induding botanica(and cammon names. f� Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site,by species,size and location,including drip line. 5c7 Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exciusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking iot and vehicular use�reas. � lotation of existing and praposed struttures and improvements, inciuding but nat limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patiosl dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs; water lines, sanitary sewer iines, stflrm drains, seawalls, utility easements,treatment af all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed landse�pe. Si Lacatian af parking areas and other vehicular use areas, induding parking spaces, circulatian aisles, interior landstape islands and turbing. �7 Drainage and retention areas,inctuding swales,side slopes and bottom elevations. K� Delineation and dimension;af all required perimeter landscaped buffers inckuding sight tnangles, if any. Pfannir�8 D�velt�pment Depertmant�160 S.Myrtle Avenue,C[earvrater,FL 33T56.TeI:72T-5624387;Fax:T2T-5S2�d86b Page 5 ot 8 Revissd 01J9? ° ` ��t , Plann€ng&Development Department � � � 1 i'1�a�� Flexible Develapment Application " �eneral Applicability Criteria PRQVIDE COMPtETE RESPON5F5 TO EACH OF THE SIX(6)GENEitAI APPUCABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAt1NiN6 HOW, IN DETAIL,THE CRtTERi�N IS BElNG COMPLIED WITH PER Tt115 DEVELUPMENT PR�POSAI. 1. Thc praposed development of the land will bc in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density anci character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Attachment"B" 2. The proposed develapment will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantfy impair the value ther�of. A#taChmBrlt"6" 3. The propased develapment will not adversely affect#he heaith or safety or persons residing or working in the nei�hborhood ofthe proposed use. Atkachmerrt"B" 4. The proposed develapment is designed to minimize tra��congestion. Attachmont„B,� 5. The proposed development is cansistent wrth rhe community tharacter af the im�ediate vicinity of the parcei prtiposed f�r development. Attaehment"B" 5. Tt�e design of the proposed development minimizes advPrse effetts, induding visual, acoustic and olfactory and h�urs of aperation impacts,on adjacent properties. Attaahmant°B" Plannln a Devetopmertt�--- ____ DepBr�nertt,100 3.Myrtle Avonue,ClearwatAr,FL 33T58,Tel:727-362-4567;Fax:72T-562�d868 Page 6 pf 6 Revised 01/i2 � � � �a�at�r Planning&Development Department Flexible Development Application `' Flexi�i�ity Criteria PROVIDE C�MPLETE RESPUNSES TO THE APPLiCABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S}BEING REQUESTED AS SET FQRTH IH THE ZONING DISTRICT(5}{N WH1CH THE SUBJECT FROPERTY t5 LOCA7ED. EXPLAIN HQW, iN DETAtL, EACH CRfTERION tS BEING COMPUEO WITH PER THIS DEYELQPM�NT RROPO�SAI(U5E SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY), 1. Attachment"C" 2. Attachment"C" 3. ��lr►t��L..� d. AEtachmern"C" 5. Attachment"C° 6. Attaehrrwnt"C" 7. Attachmen#"C"' $� Attachment"C" Planning�pevelopment pepartment,100 S.Myrtle Avenus,Glearwater,FL 33756,TeF:727-SSa-a587;Pax:72T-562-4865 Page 7 of 8 RevisQd fl1/12 '�. � + �� '�a�In:t�� :��E�t��a�;�c E�r�ar�n��rta _ �`t�x��I+� D��r��op�� i��cat��n ��t t� ��i�� •��r�� ={r�nidls;,�Chn!�i an�Chr'rsti�s�Rev��ab�e 7rusE .. � , ::f�rki ri�Qth.i��,?��5f C=°!� _.,.:(� - ..� ,r_�t..... .. �t . �f:'�i}.i'i"�stacryYi��:�q}"�'.�Dr:°t�: �:�ari�js$tS�Et,vi$clR4��', YE 337�' _ _ � •��}� G,'��,"''y ,.:;n._�.�.�f.nr,i � ,�Ft��. � C� �d`1�C� - , .._T�^"i�.".�'tn_ r_ _ . iA. C}..2{l!: ��=,a Att�Chrn�,�'„�. i�^*.°.+€�i:Cf_i��1�'�J(E"_ . ,. . =�t._.°i4en`�j e"� :a�.��,'� �! .3�`�C:�7" ��S�stainahilit?a�r��;�. �LG aad Behar P�lera�ezc Architecture . .«._ _ , . ,�"1�i�; . ;��c��s�;iv PX��_�2 2Pti ��.�:"?,";�v'f�?iiiE:` �7r:;ix`(x t.�1"�t(?.:�;��'}�ts ,.�'�C�_�l � �f��.(T. ..._ __._.—._ _. ___. Y �� ,r . . , C^-i� ��'�t, i�_ J�E[ L;='Pf.U�°� .c: inrJ�±=c ��i �.i'V Ci' :.��1'�Ne�_Af,- !=�Cf7Cir `,� ':t1-.�ts'�,�- n 4� F��i,e _ . CC:' ;3^! i. � r'n... 't2 c._;j'.�p�< - ��ia'-�I��'. _. �. S�i� dl�f�� v .^� �::��c" c.',. E1P.ti�e-..�fV .��r i;T' f rsn'�r+.,r� � , tt � �+Y° ' P�<4�E�,act':t'.v Wfv2:" 2 :3t"'J`f?y� �°'!i: .��E uL?�?' d ,� .i,� K�i�'f��. ...G"is'i''s 4,_�r`.,� 'L°FrL�=�=,��'�arivES -�:'J?�S?.;^L"�. ;Ch�`'�F:ci��l�}'?€'DfG�2t"'4'�et._'i�2C �ifl ii'i5 c'�}:.�iC�i�??^., .. - ,. _.> • ; � . - - (,;;2�r;. � "� ` " _ Y .r P,.t -il �t � � - � }�'tt, wt'��?C�i�..��. 3t,.;,�tsi4', ,�=suay:Ce!`,*r'•t�9'cTt pro��!i�+�C d"�f t _ a_.m. �� .. � . ___.- _ �,,�—---:=',.-^°" "°'"'_-�- _ � ._.__�_—._,�_ _ ��1�� _ �.: ..c - ?ry'y'L�dl•:'#��-_.},._�..�.__.__,. -- �,. - ,-.. -� _ . . . _ _. _....._--- i ..:r � .� � .. �vcrt'�".��J'�cl� .___._._ _ ..... ��.�'�E�S' f'�.�iR��?�.x��1!4 i i Q�P�$=,�� i " '� ._ _ �. _={ '�;2r- i d, � � ..��_. �5,f�.rVt�. r�.�'�F��}`v�.�° ..v��!`�.i.��'�iv'�77v;��''.�.��"` �h`� i.n°.".�� + �± :,`, "�� *'� !�- -�`+� t+t"� L.., �<=* �.+� - __ °y:_� r' '�,'t;;= - - r _�_. " - Fc�;�`'JN+�+��`v 4�s=,�ri�� - , . . . ° ` . . ,'�� _.. _'l°'.v a-i.�.:r`�'`�}s..� �t-'v '�-i.`"F°`�r'",�.V_ �.�.fr:.�� ,.- '._. .- ..- .. �-. .� -.. .. . _ �._ ' . � ,-'h'1✓v '�f~vi�I��Y 1.�1 ��'R'=lt�'��:�+Y Y?�T�'1l:�4"��-�I-� vti.7^\�'f_,-`i . i . % . ._ ` _��. ��y�� . . - .. _-_-,-.-.,._..,��"__' „ � ' . . ..._ �B .. � , l: _4^�.f� .-�i�9�L �.X`��Ei . ��. .._. . � ��'`�{`i "' • �: ��«� 'ictary��biir,.5z�t�G!�kGiiQ� ",�__ �-� �,-�--_ �,- _-- :�+ = �X Cor�m.:x��r�s Ges 2,?i}t5 >,, .... _ ,, � _ r . , - :� �: u . .- s, w, r�. _,__ _ - -- _ _ �_ .t�,:` �;,�,� �E . .':°�r "�_- _ .... . 7'?,., �1:�ie . ..,r.., --t r3 . ^.i�, . . . . -`.4'� er r_ _.. �n '1t; :Zr-�.� •3St�. .x' .� -ih�-�$�� ' �,�,.5_,-�'�. c ATTACNMENT A DES�RIPTIC�N 8F REQUE�TS The subj�ct pra�rty is located at the sauthwest corner vf Papaya Street an� Far�settia Avenue on Clearwater Beach within the `Retail and Restaurant' dis�rict o#Beach by �esign. A r�quest is being made for a reduction ta minimum parcei s�te under th� tourist zoning designation frpm S,OQ4 sf ta 2,739 s#. An additianal request is being made for a change in land-use firom "r�sidentiai attached dweilig' to `restaurant' with outdvor dining cafie 48D outdoor seats and 28 seats located ai�ng the sidewalk a� Poinsettia Avenuea, �atron din+ng aiong Poinsettia wili consist of removable table, chairs, raili�g sys'tem and bicycle�ack. Redeveloprnent of the subject parcel will require several setback reductions as outlined beiow. The appltcant is al$o asking for relief fram placing large transmissian eiectrical service lines, poles and soft utilities underground that are lacated adjacent to the subject prvperty aiong the right-af-way o# PoinSetfia Avenue and Papaya Street. Roinsettia and Papaya contains severa) underground utifities that�rould be in dir�ct tonflict with any relocation{utility vaults,gas main, sewer main,tra�c signal lines &box, ett. lt is impractica!#or the applitant ta piace such ufitities underground without redesign �ndjtsr major relocativn of tity owned services impatting �urrounding properties. All ser►rice lines into the property wii! be placed underg�vund as required by City of Clearwater Land Deuel�pment Code. The request includes; � Minimum parcef 5ize f�ortt 5,000�f to 2,799 sf. + 1{l8 seat Qutdoar Dining Cafe (80 autdoor seats on-site&28 seats within the pubtic sidew�lk af Poir�settia Avenue). • Cvnversion frorn residential dup(exJtriplex to restaurant use. � Reduction in f�ont(northj �etlaack from 15.i�ft to 5.00 ft. building$c 3.5D ft.paver. � Reduction in frvnt(east}setback frtarn 15 ft to 3.25 ft. paver. � Redudion in side (south)setback from i0 ft ta 6.Q0 ft. building&OSi�ft. s�aver. i Reduction in side (west� setba�k frarn IO ft ta 7.9Q bu�iding&OSp ft. paver. • Elimination of relocating any transmissic�n lines along t�e right-c�f-way vf Papaya Str�et and Poinsettia Avenue undergrvund. ATTA+CHMENT � GENERAL APPLI�IBILITY CRITERIA 1. The propased devefopment of the land wilf be in hQrtrtony witn srnfe,hutk,coverage densfty and chararter of vdjacent properties in which it is lacvfed�n The redevelvpment af the property i�car�si�tent with revitalEzation goalS arrd the character set forth in Seach by Design for the Ffestaurant and Retail d'+str+ct,lmprovernents wi(I help act as a�atalyst for redeuelopment to�urrounding properttes,while c�ntinu�ng ta connect r�tail ant!commercial activsties. Papaya Street contains several unimpraved properties between Mandalay Avenue and Poinsett€a. Pmperties narth and so�th of the subject site, contain a mi�tture of restaurant and/or r�tail activities. The Buildi�g wil[be smalier it� nature consisting df onfy a kitche�area, roll-out container stQrage e�closure, and restroom facilities. A tota!of 8t1 seats wifl be provided vutdoars capturing walk-up�raffic from fc��a1 ernployees,#ourist, neighbars and pedestrians from the beath.The applicant is aiso reguesting th�t an additional 28 removable seats be allovued as an outdaor cafe use within the public sidewalk o#P$ir�settia Avenue. The building wilf campiement the adjacent neighbars in lieu flf a bi�bax st�ucture over powering them with zero lot(ines.This vuil! hel�r treate inviting step ba�ics ir� plan for both pragrammatic and visual interest dov►+n Papaya. Beach by Design guldeiines do nat specify specific design triteria fvr this dis#rict but does discu�s gen�rai bui#ding pararrteters witt►in the Bea�h by Design overfay. Npwever the design of the proposed praject; buildings, outdoor areas, and iandscaping meet the int�nt of Beach by Design. The Bulk c�f the propvsed struttute is in keeping with the sing{e st�ry character ihe neighbvring buildings,since the site is a rather small parcel;the building is kept smail�with adequate setbacks,thus allowing far adequate landscaping and visua)space from its neighbc►rs_The bui{ding is designed as a srr,a{I"tropical beach house" with board a�►d batten siding,wid�white t�im, and a standing seam meta# roof;typical treatment fr�r smaller stru�tures on the beach. The lush and inviting dining areas, the enhanced perimeter landscaping,the semi see-#hreugh fendng, and th�wide sidewaiks,encourages and prornotes pedestrian friendly street I�vel activity arvund and within the site. Our goal for the res#aurant is tv create a people friendly�lace where an"average Jve"wi11 feel comfarta�ile. 2. the proposed devetoprr�erl�rvrl!not�tn�ter or discourage the approprfate develaAment and use af the arl�acent land and buitdings or signf�cantiy irr�pai�the vatrre thereof. Th�current use c�fthe building is a residential attached sCructure within ihe restaurant and retaii distritt of Beach by DeSi�n in rega�ds ta lot width.The current use is not supparted by the vision a�d us� within the restaurant antf retail dastrict. Rede�elopment of the property al(ows far the capturing af waik- up traffic from tcrcal empioyees, neighb�rs,tourist and pedestrians from the beach with a limited service restaurant,The developrnent wiN nr�t hinder its neighbors, but wiil bring�atue and pedestrian traffic to Attachment"B" Page 1 adjacen# praperties.The develapm�r�t will be a"trvpicai beaeh h8t�se"theme contributing to a cnore pedestrian frienday and aetiue fa�ade aiong Papaya and Poinsettia.The ualue af the abutting properties wii)t�ot be tompromised,and will likely be enhanced by the developm�nt of�he project. 3. The prvposed wifl not adversely affect the hea/#h ar safety af persans residing or wvrking Jn the r�eighbarhaod of the propased use. Construtt�an of a new faciliLy replaces the vlder attac�ed residential dwelfing,which cont2ined nan- cs�nforming ba�k-ou#stalls within the right of way af Poinsettia Avenue. The prc�posed design el�minates back-out statis;thus, 3t1CCEHS1Rg Sofe#y to vehicular street mvvemen#as wel{as increasing safety ofi pedestrians. Several pro�er[fes along Poinsettia and Papaya cantain discontinuous or substandard sidewalks connecting ped�strian$t� surrounding districts. Upgrade to pedestrian friendly pathways within Roinsett+a �erving the restaurant and retail distritt.There are na uses p�oposed that will have a detrimenta{effect an the health of persons residin�or wc�rking in the neighborhood. 4. The praposed dev�lapment is designed ta minimize traffic congestion. The praposed project is a iimited-s�rvice restaurant prorno#ing the concept of pedestrianisrti as an alternative fortrt of transportation for vis+tar�,resident5 and employees resid'mg or visiting Clearwater 8each,The existing site contains several non-conforming"`back-out"stalls al�ng Poinsettia creating a conflictin�pt�int€or vehicular movements at the inter�ettian.The City of Clearwa±er recently re�ised cade tfl elim+nate�ark�ng requirements fgr restaurants within the retail and restaurant distrift per Beath by Design. Redevelopment of the parcel alfows for upgrade vf pedestrian friendly environments afong Papaya and Poinsettia Acrenue.AI(employees will be required to�either walk,sk�tebvarci,ride bicytles, ar may be reimbursed fcyr public transportation to wc�rk;thus elirninating traffic to the establishrrtent cflmpletely. 3. The propvsed develo�tment is canslstent wrth#he communi#y thart�cter of the immediate virin�r a,�ti�e parcet prvpc�sed far deveiopmen� The visual interest of th�development wiA provide a #ropica! beach house theme w'rth a mixture of ei�ments,which is tonsistent tnrith surrounc#ing uses. 7he architectufal design af the building wil� provid�most af the desired elements that are listed in eeach by Design's retai!&restaurar�t distrlct. The Bufk of the pro�aosecf structure i�in keeping with the single story character the n�ighboring buildings, since the site is a rather sma{I parcel;the bui(d#ng is kept small,with adequate setbacks,thus allawing tor adequate landscaping and vi$uai spa�e frorn its neighbors.The buitding is d�esigned as a small"tropica! beach house"with board and batten siding,wide white trim,and a sianding seam metal roa#;typical treatment for smalfer structures on the beach� The iush and inviting dining areas, the enhanced perim�ter iandseap'rng,the semi see-through fencing(fronti�g Papaya and Poin�ettia►,and the wicle sidewalks,en�oura�es and pramotes pedestrian frien�ily stre�t leve3 attivity around and within the site. {)ur goai fvr the restaurant is to create a people friendly place where an"average Joe"will fee! cvmfortable.A water fountairt wiN be irnplemerttetf creating a stunning outdoor en�irQnment. Attachment••6„ Page 2 6. The design of the pr�pased devetapment minimizes adverse�ffects�intluding vis�al,acoastic a�nd alfoctory and hours of impacts, �rr adjacent praperties. The prc�posed develapment minimizes adverse effects on adjacent properties by creating a more acti�e street levei fas�de contributing to the redevelapment of propertie�dawn bath Papaya and Poinsettia Avenue.The redevelopment flf ihe parcQl far a restaurant use is ccrnsistent with what is allawabfe within the tourist zoning designaiion and Beach by QeSign'�gauerning retail and re�taurant district.The r�deveiopment of the property wifi reduce acoustic and offactory effects by improving on-site utilities, while insta{i�ng a decvrative-themed baml�oo�opaque� "fence" along the back of the prc�perty. �encing along Poinsettfa and Papaya w,11 be serni-opaque with landscaping further screening adJacent use{s�.The �rc�urs of aper�tion will (ae 7 days a week from 1I:(l0 am to 10;f�0 pm with 6re2�kfast being served on weekends from 7:30 to B:Ofl am. �►ttaGi'SR'121'yt"8" Pi3g2 3 ATCACNMENT C CC}NfPREFlENSIVE IN�ilt REQEVELC}PMENT PROIECT �, The development or r+edeveJopr»ent is otlterwise ir»pracfical without dev�a�ir�n�from the us�andfar devetapment sfandards set forth �n this zon�ng district; a. The subject parce! is located at the intersectivn of Papaya and Poinse#iia Avenue surrounded by existing estab#ishments within the tourist district created pre-circa199g. 7he development is impra��cai without a dacrease to minimum parce! size, setbacks and installation af underground utiGties within the city`s right-af-way. P�acing overhead fines underground is imRractical due to a clus#er of existing undergraund infrast�ucture �iong papaya and Poinsettia. Relocation o#such {ines {water, sewer, gas, traffic signal box, reciaimed, progr�ss energy wauffslunderground conduit}wvuld inuolve extenaive plamm�g, financiat contribe�tion and re[ocation of rnajor ufilities owned by others. A Reducti�n ta severai setbacks an�i allawance below minimum parc�l size is requested giving the pro#�erty the abiiity for revitafization,whiie irr�proving#he pedestrian environments along Papaya Street and Poinse#ti�. Withvuf a deviati�n from code the subject prpperty would be impractical far red�velop. 2. The devel�pm�nt vr redeve/apme»t wi(1 be consistent with the goa/s and policies of the Comprehensive Plan,as well as with the general purpose, intent and basi�ptarrning objecfives of ttris Cade,a»d with the intent ar�d purpase af#his zantng disfrict= a. Redevelopment of the property is consistenf with the goals a�d poliaes set forth within the Cvmprehensive Plan and Taurist zoning standards by changing the Iand-use fram residential fo restaurant conforming to Beach by Design's Retail and Restaurant district. 3. The development or redeye%s�m�nt wilt n�t im�ede the normat and ord�rlj+deve%pment and impravemerr#of surroundingr properties; a. The revi#alizatian of#he property wiil not irnpede or hinder surrounding prapertfes, but act as a as a catalyst fior fuRher redeveiopment to sub- standard prop�rties between Manc3alay Avenue and alor3g Poinsettia. Red�velopme�t af the prrsperty wiil only enhance property�aiu�s to surrounding �reas while creating a pedestraan fr[endiy environmen#. Attachment"C' Page I 4. Adjoirling Propertles witl rrot suffer subsfantfaJ d�triment as a re�utt of the proposed devetopment; a. Papaya Street c.+antains several unimpraved pr�perties betwe�n Ma�dalay�v�nue and Painsettia. Pro�e�-ties n4rth and s�uth of the suf�ject site, cantain a mixture of restaurant andtor retail activities. Adjoining properties will no#suffer substarrtia! detriment as a resuft t�the proposed development. Rectevelopment af the setbje�p�p�rty only increases property vatues while contrikruting tv a more dynarriic and active street life. 5. The propnsed use sha(t athe►wis�6e permitfed�y the underlyin�future land use ca#egary, be compatib/e wi#h adjacerrt land uses, wit!naf st�bstan#ialty atter the essenfial use charac�erisfics af the naighborhood;and shall demonstrate�mpliance with vne or more af the foilawing obfectives: a. The proposeri use Js perr»itted in fhis zoning dfs#rict as a minimum standard, flexi,ble sfandard or flexible developmerrt user i• The prapased use is cansistent with raquieements set#arth within tourist designation and Beach by Design for the retail and restaurant district. b. The prapased use�rouJd be a sigrr�cant economrc cantrihufor#c� the c�ty's ecanomic base by dnrersifying Hte local ecvnomy ar by creating jobs; i. The propased development wi11 help contribute to the city's economic base by creating 6 jobs to loca( residents t�f Cl�a�vv�ter Beach. c. The development proposal accammodates the�pansion or redevel�opment ofan existing ecor�amic contnibutor; i, The redevelapment af the pra#�erty allows#or compliance within �each by Design's retail and restau�ant distr�ct by changing the land-�se from residential to restaurant, thus economically contributing to the area. t� 7he proposed use pro�rdes f�r the provis�on af afforda�tJs h4usirtg; i. The subject project consists of a restau�ant use and is nat appiicabfe. e. Th�proposed use p;rosride�for development or redevetopment in an area that is cttaract+�riaed by ofher similar development and v�here a fand use p/an arttendmen#and rezoning wauld resu/f in a spo#land use ar zQning designatiorr,8� A#t�chment„C" Page 2 i. The redevelopment of the subject praperty con�it�utes to revitalization efforts ta#he surraunding �rea by changing fi�om a non-c�nfvrming residential use to one characterized within Beach by Design's retail and r�sta�rant dis#rict. f. The pmpased use pravides for the devetopmenf af a new,andlor pr+es�rvat3on of a worktng waterfrvr�t use. i. The proposed dsvelopment helps con�rib�+e to adjacent waterFront uses within the Marina and Des#ination Resort districts, 6. Flearib�tfty with regard fo use,lot width, requined setbacks,height and off-street parking are justified based on demanstrated ca�»pJiance wrfh a!l of the faltowing deslgn v6jectivQS: a. The proposed develapment witt not impsde the nvrmal and order►y . development an�1 improvement�f the surmunding properties for uses pe�mifted in Zhis roning district; i. The proposed develapment w�l1 nat imp�de, but act as a cata(yst far recievelapment for other non-conforming praperties wi�hin#h� retail and restaurant district. �irectly#owards the west contains a residentiat attached dwelling within the districf that is nat support�d by the vision of the district. Narti�► and Sauth of the subject property cantain severai rest�urants along with retail establishment. b. The prapased d8ve/opmenf comp/ies rvith applicabfe design guideJines adopted by the cif�; i. The propased redevelopment is cansistent with Beach by Des'sgn's revitalization efforts for a retai! and res#aurant dist�ict_ The project altows for enhanced pedestrian envirflnments while cannecting s�rr�unding properties. The restaur�nt further supports connection to Mandalay Av�nue's retai!district along with Marina towards the east. Th� parcel and buiiding is smaile� in scate, thus eliminating many Qf Beach by Design's guidefines. c. The design, scale and intensify af th�proposed devefapmenf su�ports the estab/ished ar emerging character vf an area; i. Ti�e design, scale and inCensity of the prop+�s�d project supports 8each by De�fign's retaif and nestaurant by providing pedestrian friendly environments canneeting adjacent use(s} particular Mandalay Avenue's retail area. d. /n arder to torm a cohesira, visualiy inferestingr and attracfive appearance, the propnsed developmerit inCOrporates a substantial number of the foltowirr�r design e1�r»ents: i. Changes in horizontat buitdln�pt�nes, Attacnrnent"C" Page 3 1. The buiiding i�ju�t 1� feet a�o�e base fload elevatian, therefore making it imprac#ical and unnecessary to create a�fificial harizontal building breaks. However we are propc�sing a signif�ant�3" to 36" roof eav�t�affectively create a harizontal visual line a�d buiiding mass break dawn. Il= �1se�rf archit�Ctural detail�such as cvfunt�r�, �c�rniC�s, stringcourses,pilasters, porticos, baicc�nies,railr'ngs� awnings, etc.; 1. This quaint buiiding incc�rpo�ates a variety a�tex�ures�nd architectura121ements. We use board and batten siding with wide accent c�mer trim, artd a�ride frieze running the pe�imeter of the bui�ding. We are also proposing ex�osed rafter tails and stan�iing seam or r„orrugated roofing. Tt►e order and pick up areas are under a coiumned and screer�ed pc>rch. iii. Variefy in materials, cnlors and te�ctc�res; 1. The�ropased design incarporates ctear finished standing seam metal roofing, smoott�white frieze and corner trim, anti a iight pastel gray bc�ard and batten�iding. The neutral building w'r!! serves as a background f4r very colQrful seating. signage, and landscaping. lv. Distinctive fenestration patterns, 1. Because o#th�small scale of the building, we have minimal fenestra#ion, but the order and pick-up area is distinguished from the r�st of the building by being wtthin a cafumned screeneti in porch. v. 8uitding stepbacks;and 1, Ev�n with the diminutive size of this praptased buitding we provide stepping in the buitding foo#pnnt. vi. �istinctive roafs fornrs. 1. The praposed buildin� is r�ther smal! b�t with the h�PPed rvofs and smaller dorme�s the design provides for a varied slcyline and also senres#o breaks down the massing. e. The pniposed c�e�retopmet�t provides far appropriate buffers, enhanced Ianalscape ctesig�and appropriate distar�ces between buildr'ngs. i, Th�propqsed developm�nt prorrides for apprapriate buffers for #he said use frorrr adjac�nt neighb�rs while providing impraved pedestrian friend[y watkways within Poinsettia and Papaya. Attachment••C, Page 4 Emergency access is available ta a11 sides of the propetty. The establishmsnt is confained within an vpaque bamt�o fence further screening adja�ent uses compiimented by a `trapical' f�nds�a��d environment. BEACN BY DES1��V DESfGN GU(DElINES A. Densi#yr The maximum permitted density ot residenfia!development shail be 30 dweiling units per acre. Through tF�e use �f Transfer of Qeveiopment Rights {TORs) from other property iacated within the Clearwater Beach Community Redevelopmen# DistriGt, the maximum �rmitted density for r�sidential d�velopment may be inereased by nat m�re than 2a percent. Historicaf�y the m�ximum permitted density for avernight accommodafion uses has been 4d units per acre. in c�rder ta a�sis#in the redevelopmen# �f Glearwater Beach, the maximum permitted densi�y in Beach by Qesig� shall be 50 units per acre_�` it also allows this maximum density crf 50 units �r acre to t�exceede�thr�ugh the allo�c��ion �f uni#s frr�rt� the Qestinatian Resort Qens�y Paol; th� allocation of units from the Hotel density i�eserve, and the use of TDRs frc�m other properties tacatet!within the Clearwater Sesch Gomrnunity Redevelopment �is#rict in campliance with the failowing pravfsians= 1� Th�amour�t t�f TDRs used fo�resorts/ovemight accommodat►on pr�jects shall not be limited provided such projects can demonstrate �ampliance with the prowisions of this Plan, the Commun�ty Development Cv+de and concurrency requirements. Z. Any T�Rs gained frc�m the �t#ditional '10 ovemigh# accQmmodation units per acr� authvrized by fhis section of Beach by Design shall anly be used for overnight accommodation uses. The conversion of such density to anath�r us�is prohibited, Beach by D�sign also supports the aifocation of additional d�nsify for resort d�veiopment through the aestinatian Resort Density PoQI estabfished in Sec#ian V.B.1 pf this plan, as well as the atiocation vf additi�nal density for mid-price hotels through the Hotel �ensity Reserve est�blished in Sectic�n V.B.2 oithis plan. The maximum �ermitted floor ar�a ratso for nonresiden#development is (imit�d to 1.0 pursuanf to the Pinellas County Planning Caunci� intensity standards. The proposed proje►cfi daes no#inclnde a request for TDR's. B. Height Attachment°C" Page 5 Maximum height is prescribed by the respect►ve zoning districts in the Community Development Gode untess otherw+se restricted by Beach k�y Design. The height may E� incrsasad, hawever, to one hundred fifty feet (15Q') if: 1. additi�nal density is aliocated to the dev�lr�pment either by transferrect development rights, or via t�e Destination Resart Density Poo# pursuant to the CRD ttesignation, �r via the Hotel Density Reserve where the subject property is located between Sou#h Gulfview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico or on th�west side of Coronado ��ive; 2. portions of any structures which exceed an� hundred feet (100'� are spaced at least one hundr�d f�et{1Q4') apart (w+th no more than two (2) structur�s which exceed ane hundred feet (1�0'� within five hundred feet (50f3'}; ar f�u�(4� structures wh�ch �xceed o�e hundred#eet (10Q'} within eight hundred feet {$04') so long as the �I�va#ic�ns af ail StfLICtUr@5 WhECh G'XC@+@CI 011$ I�UCI�r@CJ'FBEt ('I OD'j when suCh structures are viewed fram the east do not occupy a total Qf#orty percent �44%� of a nart� south vertical plane which is parallel to the aiignm�nt af Cor�na�io and North Mandalay Qf the buil�ing envelope abave one hundred f�et (10a"}; and Tlte Proposed development is limited to 11'-8" abovs base f�oad elevation, thus nat applicahle to the above criteria. 3. the floorpl�te of any portion of a building tha#excee�s forty-five feet(4�'� in height is limited as fallows: a� betwe�n forty-five feet(45`) and one hundred fee# (1�0"), tl��floor�iate will be no great�r#han 25,OOt} square feet except far parking stru�tures apen ttr the pubiic; and b} between on� hundred feet {�1�0�) and one hundred fifty feet�150'}, the floorpia#e will be no greaterthan 1�,000 squar�f�t; and �} devia#ions ta the above floorplate requirements m�y be approvsd provided the mass and scale of the design creates a#iered effect and complies wifh the maximurn buitding envelop allawance above 45' as described in sec#ion C_ 1_d be{ow The P�opased deve{opment is iim�ted #011'-8" al�ave base flaod etevation, thus nat applicabl�to�e ab+ave criteria. C, Design, �cal�ar�d Mass of Building� Att�chment"C•, Page C Na particuiar architectural s�yle is prescribed. However, good architecture, from a community character perspectiv�, cames in all shapes �nd styfes. There is, however, in every communi�y an established vocabulary of the "good,"the"bad,' and the "ugly." New buifdings shautd respect fhis vocabulary and enhance the community character wFt�erever pQSSibie. The more darirtg the design, fhe more sensitive the particular architecture is to faiEure. Quant�ab�e aspects �f the architecturaf vocab��ary �re: 't. Bui(dings with a foo#prirrt of greater than 5,aao s��a�e��t o�a ��,��d��,��,��n ot greater than ane hundred {�100) fe�t will be constrtacted so that no mor�than two (2) Qf the three {3) building dimensians �n the uertical or hor�zonta{ p(anes are equal in length. For this purpos�, equal in leng#h means that the two lengths v�ry by less #han forty percent (40°�6} of the shorter of the #wo (2} le�gths. The harizontai plane rneasuremertts relate tc�t�e foatprint �f the building a. The propt�ed deveiopm�nt onty cons�sts of a 5�2 sf strvcture afong with parcet size ofi 2,799 sf, which is below the 5,�00 sfi threshalds. No building dimensions measure aver 1 D� If. 2. M1lo piane of a building may continue uninterrtapted for g�eater#han one hundred lineaf feet(1 L30'}. Far#h� purpc�se of this standa�d, interrupted means an affs�t pf gr�a#er thart five feet (5'}. a. The prapvsed development anly cQnsists of a 522 s#structure along with parcel size af 2,799 sf,which is I�low the 5,0��sf threshqfds, Nb building d�mensions rneasure over 100 If. 3. At least siac#y p�rcen# {6�%} of any elevation will be cavered wi#h windows t�r archit�ctural decvration_ �ar the purpose of this standard, �n elev�ti�n is thaf partion of a building that is visibEe from a particular pvint outside the parcek propo$eti for dev�lopment. a. At ieast&t!% c�f the building fia�ade wilf be covered by architecturat decoratiQn. �. No mote than sixt}r percenf (6Q°.'o) of the theoretical maximum building envel4pe (ocated above forty-�ve feet {45') will be occupied by a building. However. in thr�se in�tancas where an ovemight accor�-�modations use on tess#han 2.Q acres tha# has been altocated additivnal density via the �iotel Density Reserve, no mor�than s�venfy-five perc�ent (75°/Aj af the thevretical ma�cirr�um building enveiqpe loca#eti above farty-five feet(45') may be occ�pied by a b��iding unless the property is ic�cated kr�tween Gulfview Boulevard and the Gu(f of Mexicot then no more than 70°lo may be accupied by a building. a. The Propased development is litmi#ett to i 1'-8" above base flood elevation, thus not applicabte to#he above�riteria. �. The height and mass af bu�ldings wiil be cnrr�[ated to: (1)the dimensianal aspects ofi t�e parcel proposed far developmE�nt and (2) adja�ent public spaces such as streets and parks. a. The prop�sed structur� �s onty 522 sf in size further�omplimenting th� Attachment„C., Page 7 srna11 p�rc�l size, while improving the pedestrian environmen��i�ng Pai�settia and Papaya Stree� 6. Buildings may be desi�ned for a vertical or horizantal mix of perrnitted uses. a. Redevefapment of the subject properky oniy atlow�for a res#aurant use, thus not reques#ing mixed•use occupancy. Attathment"C" Page 8 D. Setbacks and Sfeptaack$ 1_ Rights-r�f-way. The �� w�n �he building and the edg� of tt�� v�men� as exisfing and planned �h�uid be sufficisntly wide t4 ueate a pedestrian-fri�ndiy environmer�t. The distances from �tructures to#he edge of the right-o#-way shnuid be: �. Fifteen�eet (15') aiong ar�erials, and b. T�nrelv�f�et�1�') along I�al streets A ten foot(i0') pedestrian path is key to establishing a pedestnan fr�endly pfac� in the nonresidential enviranment. Accordingly, arcades may be construGted in the public space: but rrray r�of narrow the pedestrian p�th to les� than #en feet {1�'). Decor�tive awnings and arcades and public balconies may eactend into the public space and even intQ the right-of-way (provided they d� not obstruct vehicular traffic). Qutdaor cafe#alales are also permitted irr the public spar,e, subject to the requirements in Sectian H, Sidewa�lks_ �he buildirtg is propased on the inside cvrner af#/te lat, keeping sig►»i#'rcant setbacks to #he buildfng fram fhe corRer and right af-ways. Many structures in i't�e Qis#rict are buitt ta the righf of way prodercing bulking�zero lat lirr�bulidings, we are propasing ho%fing#he building arr�t paviny back ta allow for#ropic�l tandscaping between fhe new sidewalks and seating areas, and building campli�nented by barr�boo fencing. 2. Side and R�ar Setbacks Except far fhe setbacks set forth above, na side or�ear setback lines are recommended, except as may be required to comp4y with the City's Fir�Cade. A. Side�nd/or re�r setbacks will be maintained at a minimum ofi 5 fee# allowing for emerger�cy access to atl sides of the buiiding. 3. +Coronado Driv� �etbaracs �nd Stepbac[cs. To reduce upper stary massing along ths �treet 2�nd ensure a hurrtan scaie street environment, buildings using the hotei density reserve along Goronada Llrive shall be constructed in aceardance with the following: a, Buiictings c�n�tructed with a front setback of fifte�n feet�15') or more shall stepback vvith a minimum depth of fifteen feet (15'j frorrt#he �etback line at a hei�ht not rr�are than twenty-fi�e feet{25'�. b. Buildings construct�d with a froni se#back greater than or equa�to ten feet �1 p') and less than fifteen fieet (1�') shall stepback a#a height not more than t�enty feet(24'�. The requi�ed s#epback!setback ratio is ane and one-half feet (1.5')fc�r every one fQat (1'} reduction in s�tb�ck in addi�ion to the minimum stepback of f,fteen feet (15'�. Suildirtgs �onstructed with a front setback of fess than ten feet (10°� shalt provide a buildir�,q stepback at a height not more than fifteen feet ('{5'). The requlfed Attachrnent"C„ Page 9 s#e�aackl�efba�k ratia is two and one-half feet(2_5'}far every one foot('I') reduction in setback in addition to the minimum stepba�k of fifteen fe�t(15`). d. To achieve upper story facade variet}r and articulation, additional stepbacks may be required. Ta�void a monotc�nous streetscape, a tauilding shall not replicate the stepback configuration af the neighbor�ng buildings inciuding those across rights-of-way. e. Required stepbacks shall span a mmimum vf 75°/a of th� buiiding frontage width. The �r4po�ed devefcpment is located along Poinsettia and papaya Stre�t, white mainta�ning an 11'-8" hei�ht above base fload elevation. Therefore the above c�iterion is not a�plicable to the derralopm�nt. E. Street-�evel F�cades The human scale and aesthetic�ppeai of street-leve! facades, and their relatic�nship to the sidewalk, are�sser�tia!to a pedestrian-frisndly environment. AccordingCy: '�_ At {east sixty percent (6a°�o) af the s#reet leve!facades of Buitdings used fvr nonresidenti�l purpvses which abut a pub(ic strest or pedestrian access way, wif! b�transparent. For the purpose vf this standard: a� street level facade means that portion of a building fa�ade#rom ground leve(to a height of twelve feet t'1�'y b) transparent means windows or doors#hat allow p�dest�ians to see in#o: i. #he buildin�, or ii. [andscaped ar hardscaped ��urtyard ar plazas, wh�re str�et ievel facattes are set back af least fifteen feet (15`�from the edge of fhe sidewaik and the area between#he sidewalk and the facade i�a {andscaped or hardscape courtyard or plaza �} parking structures should utiiize archi#ectural details and design e�ern�nts such a false recsssed windows, arches. plar�tei boxes, metal g�iilwork, etc, instead af transparent afternatives. When � parlcing garage abuts a public road or other publi�place. it will be design�d such that the function o#the building is nQt�eadily apparent except at paints of ingress and egress. The propa�ed dewelvpment contr�bute� to a more dynamic and friendly �edestrian environmen#aiong Papaya and Poinsettia Aveaue. The subject development allows for pedes#rians to look into the buitding and autdoor dlning tandscaped area. 2. Windaw coverings, and ather apaque materials may cover no mare than 1 a°la of the are� of any street-level window in a nonresidential huilding Attachment••C•page lfl that fronts on a pubtyc right-of-way. The proposed structure wi11 not atfow for any�rindow cowerings ar ather�opaque materials ta any areas gre�fer than 10%. 3. Bui(ding en#rances shouid b� �esthetically inviting and ea�ily identified. �ovds for sale wilE n�t t�di�p{ayed outside� af a building, �xcept as a permitted temparary use. This standard does not appiy to outdoor food service estabGshments. This requir�ment does not apptX to the subject propert�r �ince if wltl be coRSidered an �uttivor food esfabllshrne�tt. 4. Awnings and oth�r structure5 that offer pedestrians cover from the et�ments are recflmmendeci. Awnings h�Ip define entryways and pravide �tarefrdnt identit�r Ea both pedestrians �nd driuers. O�dr�or dirt�ng tabte will consist of remavable umbreJlas atong with planted tr�es producing addifianal sttade. �. PaMcing Areas To create a wef!-ciefrned and 2estheticaUy appeating street boundary, all parking areas wi(! be separated from pubiic rights ctf way by a landscaped deco�at�ve wall, fence t�r other apaque land�cape tneatment of not less#han three#eet(3') and not more than three and one-hatf f�e# (3112') in height_ Surface p�rking areas th�t are visible firom pub{ic st��ets or otfier public places will be landsc�ped such that the parking �reas are tl�ned ma�re by th$ir landscaping materi�ls than their paved areas when viewe� from adjacent property. The use of shade#rees is encouraged in �arking lots. However, care shouid be taken ta choose trees th�t�ia not�irop exce�sive amounts of leaves, fiowers, or seecls on the vehicles belaw. Entrances#o parking areas should be cleariy marked in arder t�avoid confusion and minir�i�e automobile-pedestrian conflicts, Atkractive signage and changes ta the texture of the road (such as pavefs} are recammended. When a parking garage abuts � public road 4r o�her public place, it wil! be designed such that the funct�€�n of the building is not readily apparenf exc��at at points Qf ingress anti egress. The subject property rernaves several non-canforrning parking staHs atong Poinsettia Avenue af which require backing ou#into the rigfit-of-way. The redevefopment of#he prop�eriy wilt capture 4�% pedes#�ian cu�#omers #ravelin�, residing or shopping on +Cte�rwafer beach. �. Signage Signage is an important contribufar to the overail character of a piace. However, few general rules apply tQ signage. �enerally, signage shouid be creative, urtique, simple, Attathment�r4 P�gQ �1 and disc�e#e. Blatte signs, banners and �andv�+ich baards should not ba di�eouraged, but signs piaced on the sidew�afk shauld nc�t obstruct pedestrian traffic. Signage will be provided aiortg the b�ild�ng fa�ade shaped within allowabte pararneters of the sign code and witi be submitte�f under separate caver. H. 5idewalks Sidewalks a(ang arterials and retai! streets should be �t ieast ten f�e# (i�'} in width. Alf sidewalks a[ong arterials and retaii str-eets will be lar�dscape�l with palm#rees, spac�d to a maximurn of thirty-five feet{35'} an cerrters, with °clear grey" of not less than eight fee# (8'�. Acc�pta�l� palm trees include sabal pa1mS (sabal palmett�}, mecijoo{ palms 4pho�nix �actylifera `�rnedjool'}, anc# canary island d�te palms (phoenix canarie�sis�. Sidewalks along side streets will be landscaped with palm� (clear trunk of not less than eight feet ($')y ar shade trees, spaced at maximum in#ervals t�f thirty-five feet(35'j an centers. 'i. Portions o€r�er{uired sidewalks may be improved for non-pedestrian purposes including outdoor dining and lands�ape material, provided that mov�ment of pedestnans along the sidewaik is not obstr�ctsd: and �- non-�edestrian improvements and uses are located on the street si�ie af the sidewalk. Dis#inctive paving patterns should be used to se�arate permanent sidewalk caf� improvem�nts fi�om#he pedestrian space on the sidewa(k. To enhance pedestrian s�fety and calm traffic, distin�tive paving should also be used tQ mark c�vsswalks. The proposed development altows fQr an improrred ped�strian friendty �nvironment aiong Poinsettia an�l Papaya ave�tue. An outdoar cafe is propt�ssd along Poinsettia, del�neat�d by a removabie raii syst+�m, aitowing for separation between pedestrians and patrons of the r�staur�nt. 1. 5tre�t F�rr�iture and Bicycle Racks Street fum�ture, including benches and trash re�ptacles should � liberaliy placed along the sidewalks, at intervals no grea#er than#hirty linear feet (30') of sidewalk. Bicycle racks shauld aiso be provided, especi�lly near�pular destinatians, ta promute transportatiQn altemafives. Co�piicated bicyck� r�ck systems should be avoided. The placement of s#re�t fumiture and bicycte racks should nQt interrupt pedestrian iraff�vn the sidewaik. Tha propose deveiopment wi11 affer a removable 5-statt bicycle cack for visitars of the estabiishm�n#within the �ight-�af way of Poin�ettia ar on-site where #easible. If plac�d within the righ#�f-way a pedestrian�tear path will be mainta�ned �#ati tim�s. J. Stt'eet Ligthting Attachment"`C"Page 12 Street iighting sh�uid respond to the pedesttian-oriented t�a#ure of a #OU�iSt des#inatian. ln#hiS conteXt, it should balance the€unctional w'rth the attractive—providing adequate light to vehicular traff'ic, while simultansausly creating intimate spaces along the sidewalks. Ciearwater's his#�ric liah6ng is an at#ractive, single-globe fixture atop a cast-irt�n po(e. The praposed developmen# is n�t propasing placement andlor improvemen#tt,existing street Ii�hts. K. Faun#ains F�untains provide aMractive focat points to public sp�ces and add natural element� t� urban errvironments. Th�y should be interestir�, engaging and uni�ue. While it rs impartarrt not to t�verburden architectural creativity regarding fountains, t�ey s�toultf ineet at Eeast#he following standards in order to be a functic�nal �nd attractive campanent of the public�pace: 'l. They should be�upplemented with street furniture such as benches and trash receptades, and 2. They shouid have �ims that are. a. Tail enovgh to limit unsupervised access by small chifdren, and b. Wide enaugh to permit seating. Faunta�ns should be encouraged in landscaped �nd hardscaped court��ards and plazas. A watec fountain �s �roposed within the dining area adjacent to the southernfy lan�scaped buffer. The styie and appearance wil! match the buitding's archit+�ctural style and color. Property impmvem+�»ts da� naf include the use vf foun#ains. L. Material� �nd�olor� 1. Facades Finish materi�fs anc� 6uilding cvlQrs will reflect Fiorida ar coastaf vemacutar themes. Alt awnings should can#ain at leas#three (3} distinct colors. Bright cvlors wil! be limit�d to trims �nd ather accents. �fass cur#ain waNs are prahib�ed. 2, Sid�wa�ks: Sidewaiks shalt be canstn�cted af: a Favers; b. P�ttemed, distressed c�special aggre�ate concret�; ar c. C�tther infused treatmant that distinguishes th�sid�wafks fram the typical suburban concrete sidewalks, Attachrnent"C" Page 13 . . This project is intended to evvke the feeling nf o1d Flarida and the beach cc�mmu»ity. The building uses siding and stu�co and metat roo�ng fo reflect fhe character of the oid 6each hvuses in the area. Also the autdoor seating and landscaping w111 be insta!!ed to an extent and size fltat the area wiil feel "mature" and lush, as though it has been part of #he community for many years. The paving �+vili also be concrete pavers, adding fo the rich f�xture of fhe building and richness of the landscaping. Materials should be chosen to minirniae the cost and camp(exity of maintenance. 3. Street Fumiture d. Street fumiture wili be constructed of low-maintenance rnaterials, and will be in a color that is compatible with its surroundings. Any outdoor di»ing areas will be consistent in celor wifh the buildings and property theme and architectural style. 4. Cvlar Palette i. Recammended pa(�tte for building colors is presented within Beach �y Design criteria. See architectural renderings for cotor setection. Attachment"C' Page 14 IVII ENGINEERING,PEHMITTIN VICINITY MAP ��. GATB BBFORB YOU SRCAVATS� LANDPLANNING,LANDSCAPE 8 SUSTAINA9LE DESIGN • ' FIRE SIGNAGE NOTE: E ` � ' CONTRACTOR TO INSTAL SIGNAGE AT ENTRY DOORS PER " �'` � FAC69A60 OF FlRE PREVENTION CODE FOR IDENTIFICATION OF _ " +� �-• i °` UGHTWIEGHT TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOf SYSTEM. FOR QUESTIONS 4 �•r CONTACT CLEARWATER FIRE & RESCUE AT 727-562-4327 � . AT EXT. 3062. CONTRACfOR SBAiL CALL ° .` SUNSHIIVB • 1-800-492-4770 POR R[GH1'-OF-1/AY k ON-31TE UTIIdTY LOCATIONS ' iL STAME 36Sd51 1979)REOlNR6 A rn+.a z wvs wo�uuc.ov s ... »• 011Y5 NO710E BEFORE YOU O(GVAIE � ., l � � INDEX �., PROJEC �° "` a VICINITY ,,,,,Po`�� COVER SHEET Ct 0 R DEMOLITION PLAN C3 N.T.S. ....� `""" SITE PLAN C4 � PREPARED FOR: � � P I M E N I D I S, J O H N H & 6ENElih6 BET/1i�S �.� n ,�: LANDSCAPE PLAN&DETAILS CS CHRISTINA REVOCABLE TRUST SITEDATATABLENOTEs I.OWNER NAME: PIMENIDIS,JOHN H 8 CHRISTINA REVOCABIE 7RU5T 6122 RIVER ROAD PROJECT 6122 RIVER ROAD NEWPORTRICHEY.FL3L652 2.ENGINEERlLANDSCAPE DES16N: THE SUSTAINABILITY GROUP,LLC LOCATION 4421 MADiSON STREET,SUITE 105 N E W P O RT R I C H EY, F L 34652 NEW PORT RICHEY,FL 34652 PHONE:727.488.1002 FAX:727 bG5.5165 LOCATION MAP y i-� . „ 3.ARCHITECT NAME: BEHAR+PETERANECZ ARCHITECTURE ' � � 103 ROGERS STREET � p ' "� f CLEARWATER.FL 33756 A� y`� 1 PHONE:727.488.9490 �.,K'-;� FGX:727.478.3074 �'� �'� ��fi� 3.SURVEYOR NAME: C.C.L SURVEYING 6 MAPPING.INC. � �""! �''- -�a /� �/\� 5830 NEBRASKA AVENUE �� 4,�.. ��{ ,t[ �■ \O� �V� �O V/ \�I O� . PH NEOR 2 R 3 E35 i 34652 � �.� FAX:727$7L2042 �;{��'• �S II II 4.PROJECT ADDRE55: 45 PAPAYA STREET �� , .. .+-, ��. � ; Ii� CLEARWGTER,FLORIDA 33767 ` �� -"�S��j � PARCEL ID#: OB49-IS-02592-001-OL21 � I CHEEWAWA RESTAURANT n jy , i i � , I, �3 �1� i � ��'I'��i ..� ��r�r T ,,..,f � ir �I'��' h�i I� II I Id I�il , s.zowNO �r°-rouRisT � r�'w-1 t " �II 6.FUTURE LAND-USE: "RFH'-RESORT FACIlIT1ES HIGH ' ._ ..� �+��'Z ° I 7.B E A C H B Y D E S I G N D I S T R I C T: R E T A I V R E S T A U R A N T �°c� . ' � � 4 5 P A P A Y A S T R E E T 8.E%ISTINGUSE: RESIDENTIALDUPLE%/TRIPLEX �" � � '4 ��^'� i 9.PROPOSED USE: RESTAURANT W/OUTDOOR DINING { ` F .,�� . � i�M 10.OVERALL PROJECT AREA: EXIS ING: PROPOSED: RE�UIRED: . „_ ,..;�: , . ' {�-�� CLEARWATER FL 33767 PROJECTAREA �F 7 f � � i ��_ � BUILDING AREA: 1,656.28 SF 522.00 SF - ��y��`�� .: SIDEWALK/PAVERS/M�SG: 166.00 SF 1,708.40 SF +�� - , �. ...-.._ . . - VEHICULAR USE AREA(PVMTJ�. 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 1� TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: I,B2228 SF(0.65 ISR) 2,230.40 SF(0.)9 ISR)2,65919 Sf(0.95 ISR)MA%, . �'�" r �•�:f .� � 'J�" TOTAL OPEN SPACE�. 6. S . 6 . I ,� �`� � t""° �. .�,y�„4 � PARKING SPACES: 3 SPACES 0 SPACES 0 SPACES - � ' �� +��, s ^ 11.SETBACKS�. EXISTING: PROPOSED RE�UIRED: �� -�� 'a : r�y ✓ NORTH(FRONT): 0.00 FT.(TO BUILDING) 5.00 FT.(TO BUILDING) I5' ,.. � - ;,�, � ;j,.,� +',y,1�,L'. � �' ` 0.00 FT.(TO PAVERS) 3.50 FL(TO PAVERS) art. y,dr �w,r "� � ,rt � � .. ��,..... ///�� SOUTH(StDE): 0.00 FT.(TO BUILDING) 6.00 FL(TO BUILDING) 10' r - �y, �,�w _� � ( , ^ 4 ' � A ��C I I D• 0.00 FT.(TO PAVERS) 0.50 FT.(TO PAVERS) m .' ' ,?s.�` �. `�tldi"""'° . '.' - _ .;.._�,.,. '� � i-f'.�::Jj':3.A.��.: �"� G L EAST(FRONT): 2.60 FL(TO BUILDWG) 26.80 FL(TO BUILDING) 15' 0.00 fT.((TO PAVERS) 3.25 FT.(TO PAVERS) LEGAL DESCRIPTION WEST(SIDE): 0.00 FT (TO PAVERS)� 0.50 FT.(TO P4VER�S)� �� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OH-29-15 02592-001-0421 12.BUILDING HEIGHT(FROM BFE-II.O TO MID-POINT OF ROOF): II'-8"FT, LOT 42, BLOCK �A'OF BARBWR-MORROW SUBDIVISION, ACCOROING TO THE PIAT 13.PARKING CALCULATIONS: p THEROF AS RECOROED IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 45, PUBl1C RECORO55 OF PINELLAS PER BEALH BY DESIGN RESTAURANT AND RETAIL DISTaICT CWNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLONANG PORTION OF SAIO 10T: NO PARKING IS REOUIRED a BEdN AT THE N�tTHWEST CORNER OF SAIO LOT ANO RUN EASTERLY ALONG THE PARKING RE�UIRED: � NORTHERLY LJNE i}iEREOF 58.4 FEET THENCE SOIJTH 49.2 FEET TO A PqNT ON TFIE RESTAURANT osaac S w SWTH UNE OF SAID LOT, SAID PqNT 8EIN6 64.06 FEET FROIA 7HE SOUTHWE57ERlY PARKING PROVIDED:0 SPACES � CORNER OF SAID LOT, THENCE WESTERLY 6�.06 FEET TO SND SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER, THENCE NORTH AIqVG 7HE NESTERLY IJNE OF SAID LOT TO THE POINT OF BEqNNING. R E D B . 14.THIS PROPERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN FLOOD ZONE"AE-II"(El=IU,AS SHOWN ON THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP,COMMUNITY PANEL#12103C0102G,PUBLISHED BY THE SECT:8,TWN:ZJS,RNG:15E _ T h e FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY,EFFECTIVE 09/OS/03 Q FLOOD ZONE: j'�' I5.ALL UNPAVED 9 PAVED AREAS DISTURBED WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE RESTORED TO � ORIGINAL OR BETTER CONDITION. o a'°ti+, ■ ■ ■ 16.ANY WORK WITHIN THE R-O-W.WILL REQUIRE A RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT FOR THIS PROPERTY APPEARS TO 8E LOCA7ED IN ZONE �AE�� AREA WITHIN S �� S u s t a i n a b� I �ty �QNDSCAPING AND ALL OTHER�MPROVEMENTS ASSOCI4TED WITH THE PROJECT. z I7.SOLID WASTE WIIL BE PROVIDED BY A ROLL-OUT DUMPSTER. R'W>-Cn-O 2(n THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN, PER F.I.R.M. (BFE=11') FEMA MAP IB.PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS SHAIL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF #�Z�OSCO�OLG, DATED 09�O3�Z003. � � CLEARWGTER'S REpU1REMENTS AND STANDARDS.ALL PROPOSED SIDEWALKS SHALL NOT - ' �� EXCEED A CROSS SLOPE OP 2%. �p - 19.GUTTERS,DOWNSPOUTS,UTILITY BOXES,AND OTHER MISC.SITE FI%TURES WILL BE ��\�� t � ��i N � PAINTED,SCREENED,OR OTHERWISE CONCEALED,OR BLENDED IN BUILDING ARCHITECTURE. `��,�aJ' •'• i N w� 4421 MADISON STREET, SUITE 105 20.ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLGCED WITH CURB,SIDEWALK,AND ?ao; , � :� �w� NEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34652 LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXISTING COt�ITIONS OR BETTER =� �W�� 21.EXTERIOR UGHTING SHALL BE ATTACHED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. ¢;�� (p wN NOTE P: (727) 488-1002 F: (727) 645-5105 22.THERE ARE NO fREE-STANDING SIGNS PROPOSED.SIGNS WILL BE ATTACHED TO THE ., �9.g� �y� www.SGrou fl.com 23 BSEE PARKING REDl1CT ON STUDY FOR DETAIL D PA KI NG DEMA DI�INfORM4TI0N ��/ *��\"'`\`` U om CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST AGENCY APPLICATIONIPERMRY DATEISSUEDIDATEE%PIRES Z�.APP�ICANT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT TRANSPORTATION IMP4CT FEE z EDITIONS OF FLORIOA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ORDINANCE AND FEE SCHEDULE AND PAID PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT OR ROADWAY AND TRAFFlC DESIGN STANDARDS AND CITY OF cirvoFC�eaawnreRORC F�osoizaoon i�oi�z CERTIFICATE OP OCCUPANCY. . CLEARWATER CONSTRUCTION STANDAROS. SW�+� 25.AN ABESTOS SURVEY IS USUALLY RE�UIREO PRIOR TO CONDUCTIN6 ANY DEMO�ITION OR ciw��w*e NPDES RENOVATIONS.OWNER SHA��CONTACT PINEILAS LOUNTY AIR aUALITY 027/L64-4L22)POR MORE INFORMATION. ar�er FDEP SEWER 8 WA7ER 26.APPLICANT SHALL BRING ALL SUBSTANDARD SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALK RAMPS �sic�cev CITY OF CLEARWA7ER R-0.W ADJACENT TO OR A PART OF THE PROJECT UP TO STANDARD,INCLWING LATEST A.D.A. STANDARDS FOR RAISED DETECTABLE SURFACES OR TRUNCATED DOMES PER FDOT INDEX SnEEiNO. REV. DATE: 10.08.2012 #304,LATESTEDITION C� of �8 __ �I p ° +' LANU P ANN NIG LANDSCAPiEG R T ��.; &8USTAINABIE DESIGN CONTRACTOR TOINSTALL CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT & REMOVE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP , � a��$ 35LF OF EXISTING TYPE "I" CURB (TYP.) AT EXISTING INLET(s) PER GTY � _ t�a� OF CLEARWATER INDEX #604 (TYP.) �"T_'°e �/}� ^� W N ly K rVi"� CONTRACTOR TO COORDWATE WITH PAPAYA STREET(F) , .0 ogo 3 CITY TO RELOCATE EXISTING WATER PALMSTREET(P) y � °� s 10� �s �� W 0 METER, BACKFLOW & "NO PARKI NG" (40 R/!� �;r.,i;v ,,s;:, �(n �Z� CITY OF CLEARWATER UTILITY DEPARTMENT � `�`` � �� '_ ` SCALE:1"=10' �-- � � � TO RELOCATE AND REMOVE METER & CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT GRAPHIC SCALE (n a BACKFLOW DEVICE (TYP.) & REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) �• ��' `�,� „_ ,�.� _ _ TinN . � i ' � , 51' � � �� - n , � . ,• ..__ �� r. __ . _ _ � —_ " 158LF± TO EXIST -�-� � =_ � � N ,. _- HYDRANT AT PAPAYA & MANDALAY � . � � , r -,_ °�F— M 0 ' � �:�� Z J Q ti �' � � - � a _ =Q � � / ' EXISTING PALM R �� W = I � X ` � X , �—� TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) Q� � � _. �/ \ � \ � `� v I� s � � � � + � � ZQN � ' WZ r I\ � �� a �� i �, �� .�� T I Z CONTRACTOR TO INSTA�L �X � � � V FILTER FABRIC SILT ' "� FENCE PER CITY OF CLEARWATER ` INDEX #607 (TYP.) � z • � r I � WM g �� a I E �;�, f r ,J ;:,;f CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT & REMOVE �� Z ;r r £d - EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING AREA (TYP.) � Q W � � �.� O CON RAC OR 0 SAW CU � w a Q w T T T T & REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE 8 RECONSTRUCT 2 4 �J � EXISTING BOLLARD AS NECESSARY IN ORDER < U � V� SIDEWALK (TYP.) TO FAGLITATE CONSTRUCTION (TYP.) � w ��, a a m � t��,��_' ,''_; , €�:' < � ? �_ X ,+;L(�C�K.. � a tt U W Q � _ , �; � X � SITE BENCHMARK ; �� ; -- -- -1 -- — — _ � & _ � � .,,� _ �° < 0 �� CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE �'a' �w>–cn–o z cn `\\``�p��i*�I�f�3��, Q� EXISTING WOOD FENCE & POST � f� ` �� N�� (CONCRETE BLOCK WA�L TO REMAIN) (TYP.) LEGEND r. � � -� GENERAL NOTE: w � � GENERAI DEMOII ON NOTES: ��',� � °?j� �_° —PROPERTYLINE UTILITY DEMOLITION NOTES: Q � ='i° '� g'z'W�„ L SEE SHEET C2 FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION & DEMOLITION NOTES. i,coNrRacroR sHa��ee ResPONSie�e Foa a�� ' � �"O= m i�, �/�/�/�/�/�7/J/J/�/]�EXISTINGINFRASTRUCTURETOBE �, qLL UTILITIES SHALL BE CUT & CAPPED PRIOR TO Q Q" 2. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT PINELLAS COUNTY AIR QUALITY C.L_LLl1C_CrLO REMOVED �1 � q ENVIRONMENTAI TESTING REQUIRED PRIOR TO DEMOUTION. ��i��'".""•�ib�q� ��'a oEPARTMENT (727-464-4422) PRIOR TO START OF DEMOLITION � DEMOLITION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF F., [�, 0 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND �/ij��ll;'PR�� o°m TO OBTAIN ASBESTOS SU V .. R IREMENTS. � EXISTINGTREE W/DRIPLINE CLEARWATER'S WASTEWATER SUPERVISOR, PRIOR TO START [��,' �' b UTILITIES PRIOR TO START�NG SITE WORK. g � , TO BE REMAIN 1 � �' L.INSTALL SILT FENCE PER MANUPACNRER'S SPECIFICATIONS. OF DEMOLITION. � � AND SHALL HAVE A BACKFIL�ED TRENCHED. :*+ 3s�ao CAUTION NOTE: \�-�/ 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES O O 5.CON7RACTOR TO INSTAIL TREE BARRICADES PRIOR TO a�� o3�s,� DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION. issuaNCe oF sui�oiNe PeRn�r. ��K6a� I. CONTRACTOR TO USE CAUTION OVERHEAD TRANDMISSION 6.THE GTY OF CLEARWATER,AT APPLICANT'S EXPENSE, 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE TNAT ALL SERVICES ARE NOT 4 4 wi��RenoveiRe�ocare aNria��wareR nereRS, cE51G�e� AND UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTINGTOPOGRAPHIC INTERRUPTED TO OTHER PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. sHE�rNO- OF POINSETTIA AVENUE AND PAPAYA STREET. sPOT e�evArioN INCLUDING RECLAIMED WATER METERS 7.ALL PROPOSED SERVICE UNES FOR ON-SITE ELECTRICAL C� AND COMMUNIC/TION LINES SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND Of C� IYIL ENGINEENING,PEXMITTING LAND PLANNING,LANDSCIIPE CENERAL NOTE: LEGEND .g sr � . EDESIGN � I. SEE COVER SHEET FOR SITE DATA TABLE 8 NOTES. n/ � °�Ns 2. SIGN PACKAGE TO BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE — PROPERn,uNE /Y � ��a �LL�� 3oAPPLICANT SHALL BRING ALL SUB-STANDARD SIDEWALKS` � EXISTINGTOPOGRAPHIC �J � �=r� 20'x20' INTERSECTION VISIBILITY TRIANGLES SPOTELEVATION AND SIDEWALK RAMPS ADJACENT TO OR A PART OF THE (ALL OBJECTS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT C �aLL� PROJECT UP TO STANDARD, INCLUDING LATEST A.D.A. 30" INCHES OR LESS WITHIN TRIANGLE) Z� STANDARDS FOR RAISED DETECTABLE SURFACES OR °' ' 10' �tp �gg TRUNCATED DOMES PER FDOT INDEX #304, LATEST EDITION. YP �� f�� CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4' TALL SCALE:1"=�0' �-- � � � PAPAYA STREET(F) SEE THROUGH FENCE W1 (2) 3' WIDE SW GRAPHIC SCALE (/) � PALMSTREET(P) GATES AT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS POINTS ',. � (TYP.) (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR �. �- y� CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 32LF OF �40�� FENCE 8 GATE DETAILS) (TYP.) � VALLEY GUTTER PER CITY INDEX #101 EXISTING PUBLIC H.C. RAMP 3' U I T U B A SI ON (SEE GENERAL NOTE THIS SHEET) 8' ROLL-OUT 4' PER CITY OF CLEARWATER � CONTAINER STAGING (TYP.) 6'(TYP.) �NDEX #101 (TYP.) j j � , � �� M S J Q LL 158LFt TO EXiS ye2� } =Q � � HYDRANT AT PAPAYA a MANDALAY � _ � �SI�LN��T E� q ��•S�(R�Py �� W = \ �O � �P�� '(`�`�P �w � � QP �� , � � . ' Z¢ N � CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL URBAN FLARE 6� - - � w i " �� co O ROLL-OUT CONTAINER STAGING AREA W/ 6" r�=- - - - - - — \ in REMOVABLE TRITON (6 BIKE) a� � THICK CONCRETE W/ 3,000 PSI 0.54' I ' ' � -- - - BICYCLE RACK � W I "' � POWDER COATED CONCRETE & FIBER MESH REINFORCING V Z W/ 6"x6"/IOx10 WELDED WIRE MESH PER y I CITY OF CLEARWATER DETAIL #103 (TYP.) 8' I � � � � - - - -� � .. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL "'TC"E" oReP°� 6' HIGH OPAQUE FENCE W/ I I 29•24' \ � Z¢ � (2) 3' WIDE SWING GATES � � � j � �: � m � I � 3.25' � , Q W c`Mi fA I � � � �� Z TYP. ROOF OVERHANG I Q � � � � CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 48" MAX. HEIGHT OPAQUE � c~i�� I Q v� r I \ FENCE (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DESIGN & DETAILS) � Q� � I � � � � � _ � REMOVABLE OUTDOOR CAFE' 28 CHAIR SEATING Q a 3 � ( W � � r x � � AREA OFF & ON-SITE (SEE ARCHITECTURAL W a a� �1�t3:'Z' .`;1 �t`�_��1`,d; 2 " � -� �� w � `�'w (n � =-„ ,, PLANS FOR DESIGN, DETAILS 8 FINISH) = v� ' (� � x I �I , i U 8 V W . ; ,� ;�,:,:f_i � � 4YD ROLL-OUT DUMPSTER I ? � ��?11 I CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4' TALL SEE THROUGH o a STORAGE AREA W/ ROLL-UP � Y FENCE W/ (2) 3' WIDE SWING GATES � DOOR (SEE ARCHITECTURAL � � "``"'' � AT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS POINTS (TYP.) (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR FENCE & GATE m PLANS FOR DETAILS a FIRE I I � DETAILS) (TYP.) PROTECTION METHOD) � ._.._..�___.,...,,,�.a. I � , �--s --°--°� CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4" THICK I ' � �� 26' I PAVER DINING AREA W/ 6" WIDE PAVER � � BANDING (TYP.) (COLOR 8 STYLE TO � f "��' j �;;` � BE SELECTED BY OWNER) o � I "° ,� � i 7�9� I I I E I f CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT I I CONCRETE PUBLIC SIDEWALK PER Q I CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX #103 ° 0.5' � _�_ , 4.24' I � — - - - - - - - - - J � (TYP.) � �w>-cn-oz�n ` OPTIONAL 6'x3' TREE WELL (TYP.) ' 4� � � - - - _ - 5 `\`\`��U11*III�I/3�.,,' O�¢ ' MIN. ;��'� ��''%s., N '� � � = � � PEDESTRIAN �L� =�:_` � � °'�= ��g o ^. TH W �" 4' �O o �o Pq AY � \. =3i5 � '� o�2c w�y� � �ry J�� N F�� EXISTING 6' HIGH BLOCK WALL � ''� �y :,''b.,' '�gg` o�� ; � � ,',��/l��PA��O O gm CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6' HIGH RAILING SYSTEM FOR DELINEATION � OPAQUE FENCE BETWEEN W/ 3' CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6' TALL OPAQUE � A Q' � � '�, �` "'°° 6' HIGH OPAQUE FENCE 8 CONNECT yy�DE SWING GATE & CONNECT FENCE a CONNECT TO EXISTING 24"0 TREE WELL � Q' � �� '� TO EXISTING BLOCK WALL (TYP.) TO EXISTING BLOCK WAL BLOCK WALL (SEE ARCHITECTURAL W/ PAVER BANDING (TYP.) � M ��E�ev «s��oa. PLANS FOR FENCE & GATE TYPICAL REMOVABLE TABLE UMBRELLA 4y b SHEETNO 4M ; ,; a; : ' rr, i. . DETAI�S) (TYP.) ,,� C4 (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DESIGN & DETAILS) of C8 IVIL ENGINEERIN('a,PERMITTING LANO PLANNING,LANDSCAPE USTqINA D SIGN • � CAUTION NOTE: A/ a,�j ��„� PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT � I. CONTRACTOR TO USE CAUTION OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION /� '— SITE BENCHMARK #1 ASSEMBLY � AND UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY v � '"�$N � OF POINSETTIA AVENUE AND PAPAYA STREET. (p �� C N�LL3 Z � o' S. �o� $�o 0 �� Z� x � SCALE:1"=10' � � $ � �� CONTRACTOR TO CONNECT PROPOSED GRAPHIC SCALE (n CONTRACTOR TO MATCH EXISTING GRADE AT ' 15" RCP INTO EXISTING INLET - a SIDEWALK & TYPE "I" CURB (TYP.) � C� INV ELEV=0.00 LEGEND r;�� - - - ' - PROPERTY LINE PAPAYA STREET(F) CONTRACTOR TO MATCH EXIST / EXISTINGTOPOGRAPHIC PALMSi'REET(P) SIDEWALK ELELV=4.8 � SPOTELEVATION � N 12" ADS YARD DRAIN #I > � � � W/FILTER BASKET (`10`R/� 22LF-10" HDPE PIPE �� M MATCH EXISTING RIM ELEV=4.80 =w � � VALLEY GUTTER , 81F-15" HDPE PIPE Z m O LL �u�.; - O U � W i �p w = � f �w > U 12" ADS YARD DRAIN #2 � TYPE "C" INLET MOD.CONTROL STRUCTURE �� W/ FILTER BASKET RIM ELEV=4.90 W Z � � 158LF± 0 EXIST RIM=4.8 ,, � a� � � � HYDRANT AT PAPAYA & MANDALAY � � /' � �GN�(TYE � W 4.90 5.00 � �/ # V Z ` � i MATCH EXIST 4 � _ _ _ _ _ � 4.90 BACK OF CURB (TYP.) � - - � ~ 3 .::._. ' I � � � a � _.. t = F'� w 5.00 4.90 4.90 � � W M C� L — � 20LF-15" HDPE PIPE w �LL Z ��"` � � � � � � 7LF-12" HDPE PIPE I I � I � 4.90 ' � Q Q ,�y � � J � 5.0 0 � � � � � O � w a� z { 00 � i I i � �— _ _ \ ` w Q `r'w � GREASE INTERCEPTOR Q N co \ < U � �v w (SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR DETAILS) � � }� � I L _ , � U I \ � � _ �� ` a a I w � t�i z o I I I � °o � 12" ADS INLINE DRAIN W/ HEEL PROOF � �, t ;;E �, w H �ry I � � � � GRATE & FILTER BASKET m '� �� ; � z I f J F , (� c� ° � 4•9� � RIM ELEV=4.80 J Q � 5.45 r i � - � � � � � � � �— v� � } � � ALL SIDEWALK (ON-SITE 8 OFF-SITE) � � 5.50 i I � °a Z `" I I SLOPES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT W/ A - ° � � � w - MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 5.0% MAX. � I - � ( � `� Q I � & 2.0% CROSS SLOPE - (TYP) o � � x � ) 32LF-10" HDPE PIPE I -� I � � 5.00 5.00 I I I - - - - - U—' I "' � � � a - - - -- -� � o ADS YARD DRAIN #3 W/ ' I �,, ,: — � RIM ELEV=5.3 � 5.50 5.50 � � O � `-,,y _--- Z �w>—cn—ozcn li � _ _ FILTER BASKET & HEEL PROOF GRATE ' I w ;� � � a -----.._ .� I N __.._ � \```��u#nlLlu��,�� N"'¢ ____...._ `� ...33,y�o� N�� I ` '� .. , Z� I I � _�.u` � a o�'- �"u J� �w _ _ � � _ _ _ _ —.....� — _ J =�: CONTRACTOR TO MATCH ?J', g � ,°'o m»� 5.50 EXISTING GRADE AT ��'•..._.-•'�99� �y� SITE BENCHMARK # � \ � �_< � � � � _ � ,� � BACK-OF-CURB & SIDEWALK (TYP.) � .P �,'��4�IIPINO�\`\ o gm � � .00 �� s,m GENERAL NOTE: �� '"`°"'� °�"" I. SEE SHEET C2 FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION. GRADING & �V � `��eY "" DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY NOTES. ADS YARD DRAIN #4 W/ �s�^��eY � 12" ADS INLINE DRAIN W/ HEEL PROOF GRATE & SHEETNO FILTER BASKET & HEEL PROOF GRATE FILTER BASKET. RIM ELEV=4.80 , � � C5 RIM E�EV=5.3 of C8 i IVIL ENGINEERING,PENNITTING '� LAND PLANNING,LANDSCAPE 'L,) _ 8 SUST INR IGN CONTRACTOR TO INSTAL� (i) FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY PER CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX #402 ( 0 I ST L D G E P � �„�g � F F F F F � � ��ae e SITE BE C�M RK #1 (I) 6" G.v. W/ BOX � �aLL; PER CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX #402 � ogo3 ( (PERFORMED BY GTY AT OWNER'S EXPENSE) ��o� ° 10 �� awm S- ,�(n �_< FIRE FIGHTING HOSE LAYING LENGTH OF 143LF CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT L� � � p SCALE:1"=10' �-- � � � REMOVE & REPLACE EXISTING ASPHALT, 'A GRAPHICSCALE (n �� ` CURB AND CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) 92� � -- ° CONTRACTOR TO CONNECT �L�.� LEGEND ,�� PROPOSED SAN. SEWER 9C� _ _ _ -PROPERTY LINE LATERAL TO EXISTIN6 8° CLAY PIPE C� RELOCATED 3/4" W.M. �` ��y SPOT'E EVAOTON�PHIC � N 1.009'o MIN. SLOPE & BACKFLOW DEVICE PA T E t�` (CITY TO RELOCATE) AL S R ET(P) (I) I" TAPPING SADDLE & CORPORATION STOP • � � CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT Qr PER CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX #401 > � > °�I- ch REMOVE & REPLACE � � (PERFORMED BY CITY AT OWNER'S EXPENSE) Z m O � EXiSTING ASPHALT, I" S D R-14 FIRE S E R V I C E (S E E F I R E P R O T E C T I O N =a � }' C U R B A N D C O N C R E T E O U W SIDEWALK (TYP.) I PLANS FOR DESIGN & DETAILS) �O W U FIRE SERVICE TO DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ' o w� � � (�) I" DDCV ASSEMBLY W/ BYPASS METER, (I) I" G.V. �- � � W/ BOX & (I) 90° ELBOW (SET BY CITY Q,T W Z r � OWNER'S EXPENSE) �� a ' 1581.Ft TO EXIST , �� Y HYDRANT AT PAPAYA & MANDALAY � �RE N (TYP) � = Z \ � . V 1� �` � C�NTRACTOR TOINSTALL DOUBLE-SWEEP _ � � C.O. PER CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX #304 (TYP.) \ � ` — - - — — \ H ' Z CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 30LF OF 6" PVC SAN SEWER ' � � c�o @ I.00% MIN. SLOPE (TYP.) v �'' � � Q W M z I I `� �" g CONTRACTOR TO DOUBLE-SWEEP � _ _ _ � , w N a. C.O. AT ALL BENDS PER _ , :,4:�:,: - Q ¢w � GTY OF CLEARWATER INDEX #304 (TYP.) i � — — —I ' Q a� � J CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL I � �y , I � � \ W Q a W = O .. W v (SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION ONLY) � p0 � \� I � \ '� � U � U w 6LF OF 6" PVC SAN SEWER PIPE � Q N �p �'I j L _ — - __, \ G - � _ (4 1.00�3'o MIN. SLOPE W/6" SAN. PLUG (TYP.) I Q v►A � \ � � w � � � � I - - --: ( 3/4" RECLAIMED WATER m = ( W O � � -- METER PER GTY OF �'`•,I' ';1 fi i:> f�' `�.1?:��.s', I 2 � - I O ' � CLEARWATER INDEX #501 ' TRAPZILLA TZ,Er0�0��REp,sE INTERCEPTOR (150 GPM MIN.) U ' _' �; � ' I (OR EQUIVALENT MANUFACTURER) RIM ELEV=5.25 � � I �-�' � ' � CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL ° (PER MANUFACTURER'S, GTY OF CLEARWATER � & FLORIDA BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS) � I (I) I" SADDLE TAP W/ (2) � our000RSeoriric i CORPORATION STOPS @ EACH w (SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR DESIGN, I � _ I � °°'�"`s ! END & I" SDR9 PIPE PER GTY � SLOPE & DETAILS) ; f OF CLEARWATER t ' ;i;, t; � - ' � _._..-- .-� : :_ '.. � � _ I NDEX #501 FOR � C.O. AT ALL BENDS PER I ( __ _.._ __, ___ __. __ _, _ RECLAIMED WATER SERVICE o , . t $�: � CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX #304 (TYP.) � �,.��. ' � � , wc I RC Z �w>-cn-oz�n CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL � � °°' 6REASE INTERCEPTOR ONLY I � M R M---- .��`��*�a33''%, o Ba c � � I O _ RC .� -�:ti,,, � �� .,y i SLF OF 6" PVC SAN SEWER PIPE � 4 M�— RCIV� �?'.w:�' � ��+: �o o� C�1 I.00% MIN. SLOPE W/6" SAN. PLUG (TYP.) � � '�i= � • � I F F I =,.o p � ff;i-w°� �,�,;, 2 �i 4.0� Q7 . _ _ _ _ _ _ J . ��i�b•" •�.4q� ��< � SITE BE ��6jni�n�Piio��o° o am g � � � � � � � /"° 35�o FIRE FIGHTiNG HOSE LAYING LENGTH OF 143LF L � ' ``� P��E�� oA��.��,,�� ,,,z \ CONTRACTOR TO SAW CUT ` 4, / ��ea F REMOVE & REPLACE EXISTING ASPHALT, � [�, SHEET NO CURB AND CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) �y� � C6 or es IVIL ENGINEEXING,PEHMITTING LAND PLANNING,LANDSCAPE &SUSTAINABLE DESIGN PROPOSED PLANT LIST � E 'V$MB04 j{Q, SGIENTIFIC Fl ME COMMON N4ME SIZE REOUIREMENtS � O'�N� C�� E 3 ROVSTONIA ELATF FLORIDA ROYAL PALM 10'G.T.H.MIN. � � N LL b� u 2 LACeERSTROEMIAINDICA TONTdCRAPEMYRIlE zurcn�ier+r� PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY '� �=n'" U t LIGUSTRUM JAPONIGUM SOUTHERN WAX PRNET 2117 CAL.(8'H� � W V..� SHRU85 � ��LL; H % HIBISCUS ROSASINENSIS HIBISCUS 3 GAL.,(38"O.C.SPACiNG) z� EP 61 ERANTMEMUM PULCHEILUM BLUE SAGE 3 GAL.,(36'O.C.SPACING) O' iQ' �� N a o 0 GROUND COVER ��J Q w� RI <t RAPHIOLEPIS INDICA IN�IA HAVJfHORN 3 GAL.,(24"O.C.SPACING) r � �Z� lM 28 LANTANA MONTfViDENS15 PURPLE LANTANA 3 6AL.,(]4"O.C.SPACING) i '� � r �za�o.c.sPnar+c� SCALE:1"=10' I— � $ ^ AG 385F ARACHISGLABRATA,BENTH PERENNIqLPEANUT ROLL , GRAPHICSCALE � " 'All other non paved areas outside of planting beds to be sodde0 with SL Augustirre"Floritam". ° 'Non paved areas of tree wells shall have clean coquina shell. � NOTE:THERE SHAIL BE NO ITEMS WITHIN 17-IE 20k20'SIGHT VISBILIN TRIANGLES WHICH DO NOT MEET THE qT1"S ACCEPTABLE VERTICAL HEICaHT CRITERIA AT A LEVEI LEGEND ��!^ BENJEEN 361NCHES ABOVE 6RADE AND 8 FEET ABOVE GRADE. �V f — — — — PROPERTY LINE GENERAL NOTE: EXISTING TOPOGR4PHIC � I. SEE COVER SHEET FOR SITE DATA TABLE & NOTES. PAPAYA STREET(F� SPOTE�EVATION � N COVER PACKAGE TO BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE PALMSTREET(P) � c`�o (4�'R/{� °a� "v'' PROPOSED 4' HIGH SEE THROUGH FENCE (SEE _� Q � ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DESIGN 8 DETAILS) (TYP.) H A� =Q � } H H 13 8 SF �O W = 3 19 �� H w Z cn WR 20'x20' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE W Z � � T o - 3 NO OBJECTS GREATER THAN �� cn � il 158LF± TO EXIST � � � 30-INCHES SHALL BE PLANTED WIHTIN AREA a c!� � Y HYDRANT AT PAPAYA a MANDALAY � � • � � rn � W � m LM V Z � � 28 � \ g � _ . — r-- - - — — — H � Z 'I \ � � ., ' I � \ HB = W`'' g I 27 � r> I = EP w �� w � Igg � - - - -� � N� a � , „ lo \ H Q U �':�+FN vREGqREA I \ I � RE \ 6 Q Q� Z � � � `� W a� I � � � � W 4 �W g � m � I � < � � `��w PROPOSED 6' HIGH OPAQUE FENCE (SEE � Q N �p � ( / WR (W/ TREE GRATE) � — _ ARCHITECTURAL PLANS I � � �ci Z \ � a a FOR DESIGN & DETAILS) (TYP.) I � � �jj W � � I W � �' � a� ( 5' LANDSCAPE m �, .i- . � , ; ;.€, , , � H �� EP BUF U cn �^ / 6 / FER .. ! ( _ �— o I � I W ; ` o f � a E � I �� > � � � JUTDOORSEATWG � . o I . .. .,.. I eo sen.rs Z �. J ( . .......,.._: ..�........ '� � . � � F� ��' ` �� PROPOSED 4' HIGH SEE THROUGH FENCE (SEE o ' ` ��'' �� ( I � ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DESIGN & DETAILS) (TYP.) o (30 GAL.IPOTTED) �: � i �i I PROPOSED RECLAIMED METER wc I Z �w>—�n—OZCn ( �X � i ( I I .� �� 4.6'B qNDSCAPE ``��u*�a3��i o�w �� I UFF R _ . . I E ;�:•- - •=�.o% N � ♦ � yu�� m o� I I '�:: � �'��= �� _�;. .� �;<_ J,o �c o'2�W,', :�L��. � ��/:� z° n F:'�o� [p"_ � _ _ _ .� _ _ _ _ _ ._. _ _ J �`�, 9g� �� -- WR (W/ TREE GRATE) ��''.,,�,,,*�?R°�`�`�� <m _ _ �_ � � � Og d, � � k . � vc�cra " omwnn�wre EXISTING 6' HIGH BLOCK WALL U W EP WR H �� EDeY N N � 25 3 ` oES,a�oa� I WATER FOUNTAIN (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DESIGN & DETAILS) � Q m PROPOSED 6' HIGH OPAQUE FENCE (SEE �5 ,W � sHEeTNO RM I � ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DESIGN & DETAILS) (TYP.)Z � CH of C8 f '�l - ' E- . ' .::�. �� - . . �, � �. � .� i i� ?s �� , �, ti � �� +� . � . �''�'�',�2��h�j�t��"��Sy i��1��yn��5�� ..t': ; .�%' ' s: � , �r �� ,��:Y�r 4�r:,�;�'..��a� , , , .r, � ,. . t., },.._.�S ;�.'_ . ...� �.. .y, � .. -, t°� ` ' _'_ ` ... ' _ � � � i � �?.t'�. �;. r^ - -�� w " ' J , �I r:l�}�T /��'.' ;1�- ' � � I� � � '` '�"� b � _._._�. . + � ��:,' i . . , _ . � .' ; ;i " ; o� '- .� ;- .�� '�`x;r ' � , p . �.;� , r �°� _ �, tal roofing: Clear Finis i Me h ' F4 ` l � � � � � - �j,� ��,N� ,�� , .�� , ' , �. ,.� � Galvanized or Aluminum 1 + ' n� '. . ' `- " ( ��► � ,��,- :,�'"'�� ,�-`' �� " � ` ' �� t�; ` ' � . ' ,, r ' 3 ` A� ��t,+ ' � ; � : �� ! r � E , . _ . ", � . � . ; i , � � . j ' + � � — � — s��- - � � � � � _ •,�r - �. �, .� . , _ . • 41 � "v �� r.T � . � �f � ��♦ . V � ,�i!� -.. � `_ �i� _ . .. ._ . __. . ._._� .. ._.. _ _ .._� _..__ .. _ ._ _'.._ � �._ � � . `. � , , ., r i 3� , � .'9`. . -•,. _. _ _ .__ —_._ _ r � � ..��. ' . ; ., � � Painted Cemenfitious Trim �� -��.� ,� — ' ` �. � � � .� .� Y�,; � }�_ ,�_ �t , ; 1 Board&Botien Sidin9-rYFicot .. ,.,"G�.;:r.,,,.... .. . . , .. . . y�f./i• i � f.l � �{ � . , � . '; - i�j� � � . �b =�. � � � � � ' � o Fence, Landscape, I ,.t � , � j � � �,; �'{�� i , �r,�,,�, �,�� ,: ,�� Paint: Light Dove Gray i # � , F ' f I ��r . . � � � I,YY- � ' '.� and Paving Concept , , � . 4 , u.�- , 3 , � ;�i �i �,� �E,, :,, � �K � • �� i qP � S ��1-+ I�:�c�:.. � _.. ,: _ _ ��-t� . -- - . East Elevation (Poinsettia Avenue) , ��.:. �"M�u.� �'� ?��, � ,`c�,« y � :.� s;��' �,I�, �� 7yy � B.A,. � �.`t"'°"+-. � �I��`i{•. , a � �- ' .- � �. I� � i / S +y�� :� Yw-. ,� '. I � 1 6ri �S7 x ��'��°'�S � ' '?�`^;,�E� .. i . i= ...... _ 1� —l �� , : �� ' r �.�� •,, � "� � U'n !�i ' ^--F � '`v� T `,*o x, �'�� ' i ,�� 'h � ��"'�`�' .� .!;��'� ;,�:'�' ; .�,' �s'' , �� :>� ,L � 1 .°�� y�. $,� ��;;�, �_�" , . � y� ��:: , ,-, f -r�T•�,. ��i . ;_:� : � � : , � � . � °�' �� .-..� - – � � � � ;�1.' .L� � ,� ' - °.�,: - r � _�i •_� � a � .��- �` ' - � -,�ti F -----_ .� . � � � `^�' �,� Pamied Cementihous 7nm � .s � � �, ` � ,,� ( � � � I — � � � '�� '�{I',� iii �--:,�. --- �_;� iI � � , � ��,DO •�►� �� l�, �; l) �;i� ' � �I ' � �� , , � ( � � �I . ( , , �; f � �.� � � �� t � �, �" �, i ,,,�;^' , ' � , „ ; � I ' ; � � - ' 1� _ _ � I � � k�� ,�* �.i ��_��(� � _ ii� � . � � �___j � � _1..:� �,.��.,_ � �� ,.,,,L, �r� � ... , ��<.��_. ,. - ._ _— _ . ______ _ ___ _ --- -- – __ -- s -- --- ' �Eoard&Batfen Siding-iypical North Elevation Pa a a Street �� ( Y p ) 9 November 2012 1/8" = 1'-0" .. � • � : . __- . - i " • � • • i i . � •..— —. . • � '• • : s • a• - : � : � ( . ` ' ,,..�� ) ��...`�.7- r�:. ' � ; . _ _ ��i• �'-1�XlC7`! � � . . � . , _ •��3 { � � --�� '�1� . � '�...� � �F �F,� �� ' ` �S'L ✓,��`° � s .. .�; ' � � � � '�. ��e�� ''"*� � .�� E � ` ' -:�� _ Metai roofing: Clear Finish � . r � ° � � � � � � �� `'��+� Galvanized or Aluminum � � � , �. : � � i : � � , f � � , � � � s �, � ,� � � _ � �� .w = � � __ _ _ __. _ �. - i '°'�_'..:Ir ,., _ � � -- • � . -_. - - -- _ _ . _ �_._.___. ._ ____ _ _ _.. � _ _._.____ __._ _ _„� ___ �-,_. _� r `�''�• �� µ�;� ; Wo:,� �''^Gt-lc.�. !ka�tio��--ti i , ____. __ �M��t; ;,1�.1, ' �, �.M ,_ - � - �' - - - - .--it-: , , � _ - �_--�-��:��-=__ , '� 1i i,� �j � •:r �';` ti �i i �3� i � r � �� \ �' � f f � ,.( � � �. i � �; � � t � � Paint: Light Dove Gray : _ ___ , ,� � u � _ -- - �- _--t�=:- . �_-��- _ ___ ____ _ _-�-_-_____ � _ . __� �{ -- -=- -- - ---..-�..._.� _.. �� _ __ __ � _._ _._ _�._____ _ _ ____. __ ___ _�-_ . } _�__ ___ _ _ __.�___..� _ _ �_ __ �____ __.�_ ___.____. �,,� �``*, � E ��. South Elevation -;:, � • :;;� f, � � � � �#�` , �� ; ; � ��. � � ..�`�� , �- �� ,�, . � �' � � i _� � �� a s �k . �.�w � � _ � � ' i _ ., ; ' �� . � . ��.�A�'�. _: � �=�-i- :,-.7�i` , � ,.., ,� s.�: ,, '��«-,F�„ 4y �� ` N ' �. � �,� � . , . , , � ,�- �(�/]�`i— -;-- � � �� i ; ; � # � �` � __ -� -/�/�y'_ _-- ��, '�, � ' ' � � � , .� —_• f� I � � . . �k':�, // �� rs��Y.�i4ea8i h�-r'�. '�� . _ _--- . � �� . j � � � � � t ; ' � � ; , � ,, �: �� ; � � � � f a � � � � � �� t , , � r� � Fence, Landscape, ; ; �, ` � � ; � . ; , ' � � � � ` , ; �° ` � � ' � � � , � � �::, � . � � ' , � � ; � � r � t � l , i t � � , : _ _. _ �- _ � ___ �_ _ .- •3 s , and Paving Con�ept _ _._ ____ -- --- -- -- � .��z„ �,�,, G�-� +� _ ___- ---- _ - --— _ ____ � -�i •-- � �� AC. T � �.�e,N� , ! � � � � �G Mt� �N n � � , � n� .�__�rt___ n'� � ___ , ..____�_._._.._____.___.. __ .. .. __ -- _ --- � � �� _ , � � , ,� , � � � CP�.�� ! � _� . � i � j � � �/ I. ' � i �, i � ',:�''' $ i � 4 + / � , ,_ _ _.._ . __ _ _ . . ___ ___ __ _ �1'' ___. - -. _ .___ .. ...__ _ __ -----� -- -- _ __ __ _. _____.___.________ ----- - _ ___ _.------ _. _._ J i,ht,- t�a,r�Z- � F � West Elevation ��s�� = ��-o„ ovem er- � � �. � � i_ i _ _ d, _ e • � • .. � '`. � � 'r ♦ ` 1 `sa° -- -• . e _ ..� a s ;a �e ° ' � S . ��' � ��r` � ��, � , �� • ��, ,� t ��,�' , � �, _� >,,� � ��. 4� .'�� ' � '�. L' � `� � � �� PAPAYA STREET � .� �,�4 � �a�. =j � � � �� k �� $�� _ :� � �' � �� . � �.��' ;. �v � � �k� � �� , F �, �. � r �� , � ` � � �; ° , � � ,��.��.��#;�� `� tx � , � � w' s-..1 � � � f'� ��. �,y�c .'t "`a°�� :.�£�� ~;,�•, f `, � � ... �° ��,�`�'�'��'�±� «. `4 �' ,�. - � , � ��' . . m `� � ._. � �' � � � i ro �. ...,: t � : ; „� . " PUBUC SlDEWALK-6'-8'WIDTH �� -_ �' : 4� x^ �s� �� { � � .�.l.�.r.r tr�.�. .�'::�. ��z.�`n �.��.� , � u�'fi. �. �. r4ka i A'��1!y�;��.A 't, r.,., .v. C _ � �� .i �r �� t�h �� i Tti ��', IAN�SCI�PE AREA ;t.� °�- �` • � . � > 4 �,i; � �� t��l '� „� .� r � .. ^,� ��:e� ' IANdSCAPE ARFA ' � --"— �n � , S � � ` ' � ; �. {�`�� -- _: � . + .___ . - .., � ��: ; ;.,. -- ----- -� --- �AhDSCAPEAREA � � , � ? x J � �- ' . _ ;�� ENTRY GATE �h�-�IAPlDSCAPE j3RE�� : .��-r.uc . � .,.;� . � t�,.�,. '>- . . � t ....u-.� — - - � ,�_ _____°°--. .._ _�.L� . . � ^- . � i � �_ i �. 3 / \ !-- �� - t'-.. `� �-- . . ...... _ . `..�f � r , �� i / 1 �� . i .. . . . � j � � ' L t ' ' ` � i . � C � � � ._.. i "_. _ —: ..� �__" � `� t } ' �l�,w � �"��.. • � • , . � '_'> _" � .:—' ��-_ _p. � Z ��.-r._�— � � �,�� ; � ., 72" Fence, Paving, and ��: � ��.. .. . _ , li � . � . j. / � : ._t ♦ �- ---- -- - - ' � ° � � � � �- � � �--� Furniture Color Concept a GREASE�'RAP KITCHEN t PREP AREA �' ��-�� t-�i�\ r � p ,� ¢ ::v�,.w;.�•aa ��xn? � � i _ ♦ L_� . ' � � i - .:`. ° �' �_�' .. � / i �l � � i��I i . �'��..� ; :� - ` � '_ r��--_-...._, . ;� � � -� �; � -_ . __ ► __ �-_�� _=��, ,�r �� — i i �`� � I � � FENCE j � ��• � � gp � ; ;`_��. ��.�/ .._ �i� � `'\ {a° � . , - � . � 10'-Q M�mmum } -J �� : � 1 I � r 9 � � \ ///�` �7 `\ ' f... �, i � 1 W � \.. J�V'. � r � � ` F}'. ��}.�� C�� ,. t�,�� 3 � � `� j I i �-` �L �__, ' � , ._.t---- � . . 4� ``� �l . �i � �, I R i - ' w , � . � S' � z �' / �� . . � � / ' .w- , J.w tu / �1 � � � .r > � � _E � I _� ' �.'�\r i-� _y r _ � : 'a ;; a. �� ,'� � �.�'1 � � K - _ � f ",�," �� . � � � i �� , o o I� - _ �� _�� _ !j c<i !i t� , �I� �d,� '�,�, � , .af � a I I ' E ' I� / �� lt�� ! I_� � 1 �_ f O i! p � i t , �P��e �±'�'�, ; e u, > � i� '-- 1 J z � � ,� � ' � � � � � ' � _ �� —— ------ 1 Q '� ' � f - �� "�t a ' � ; �I i �. �� p ^ :�� .., ., ----- --, � ----__ r '� �i � � ; `4- � z # �� ,n ��:� .. � �;�� 3� `��¢ � f�PR ry �Y . i I� I� � 1I I I -. aV� . - u � � � � �. /! = _l _! � � I ' � . ; w � . + 7 �� 4� � � �� f O `ll. " • .! ' - i_� !_ � �� __ � ---...�� w � .��=� � x� t��i �� 1 4`�ti� �j.� t S f,7' I LLl I �'��,.- ..I -1 _ O �A �I '�. P,{ �-Nf � -� . ' I 4 i Z �J� �' � I �:. '. � '_.'� S�' _: .c" ,• il* � W , , L ; , Q � � a � _ � W �=- =- ___.._ -- . , o a .. a -----' ENTRY GATE � � . . � � V Z � r° t§ '� �( i � OUTOOOR SEATING c�- � C� � x � � j�� iF �� ,�r«r-�. .. 4 Z a Q ,i Sjs, � � � �:.:>otrcrns•c»uu� � �� •-..�` aasen?s � � � � �tti y,� �`�t�,,' •,.,� ' �_—_. 1� i Q �€E��{, � __-------� ..--- - -.. �"� { � _ 1 I � (l� M1 � � is4�$ 4f 1( F .�4� � �1 A , �. I __. !n '�, J . � �� I �� ! � . , . , � - � V �'±I t � ji.r4 Z t �.. -( I � . • 1 i_-'I - .. �. � -� _ w � I �- vJ .,.i � �. s � ._a- � `i �`_ m � ---- ___ _ __ — -------��- + ' " � ', '� � . �� 'V � � _ i-;� ---�v a � �� j � •� � �'�. ; � ', "� i� i � � � `�. .•M. n � ' °-"� � __ `/ �_ ,, ' Q � �--�1 �; +� � -#ta�-, .s ,��'.. < �? DUMPS7ER WC-1 WC-2 i �._____ . i � _� / 1 �w i! �-.{ + ' L tt , � � _ • . ' t � ----- - - a = � _� :�s,� �ti�.k: e.,X� : , , � _ enc , an e Conc pt . , .. ' � � � � � � a r t' � a : ; r � � � i!� ,i' � _ � � � �....._ � �� , 1 �' ...r � -.�-. ! � , F __-_ �C� L_ _. a i w .,, � :,r '�` . . � � � � � f/q �z -1 W �� ,,, �� ;sy�'� .. . � { � �/ �* � ' �' ' i � ` �9 LyC� n f , __ , ...._.._ ..... . .. __� �- .ti�-at . #° � . . �\ �_ t �` . � q � r -1 . � � i i i iI �f �"'i � i t � � j :� � �J I __ � �, ,j ��4�^t , -7� � � , . __..._._ .,_. . .. ._�..s.......a...1! . +f "�' I � �� rL�� ` ' .. . ` -� � - � � � p _ �+ :y� , ` jl jl � � � �/�/ � \v�' i I : i I �t�''� 4.�f�ro„ `. `. � � T i � I� I� � I �----- �i��.l 1�.� � � "" r, t� r , ._ ___'_'..,' i U "� ro _ `��+, ,�L ° J� i! '�--- �'�,. ''l.� � �m - � ; �,+� "�'�� t� `; t ,�,`'"`+' � ,� ryj '�� ' . . ��. . ,,.,..r �.�_.__".', •�' •_� � ..... .... 3�C'^t . ��,"a.�, a � 4' '¢'�F ��.J t c i . ....-,.... , � :x,�n,� -� �. °�`•`� ..; �� ' ��,� .. � � X� �,�� ., � ;�� . � __—�. Ex�snw�wnu-rz~ � 1 -,' � -� � '; -- c��.'C�i �''e, � �� t'! � _ , -� .,c �'� � „ . , .;v_ �_o__,._..,� i — ------- — - --- __ _ ---- -_ . __,_._. _�_-- — '' - — — — — — — __ , ,#� � �� ;`� '3 .. �� u f �''�"� ,�. rc�u�mor�erc.e.rypKa ' '' � 'M +1!a� R � .r�� _�p � '.F�4 � "'„ '�� j �". � . •� � �8+++�8.; 21'-0" �, .� �,' � � "_ *�,4� a..-, � 5�. .�� ,# �ri.�.� ;�� a��'� �' �.; ' 4� =r '-''�' t `� ,vr,�� ;� ��. .,��'F��`q. .34_� .J, -f .�r � �a� � 1 � �4 �{x '�r. �,�� J T. x.a.. # %"�'_ . . - • . 9 November2012 Site Plan �/s" _ �'-o°� 48" Fence, and Landscape Concept - - � � „ :- . ` - . - • � " • ' � • ! 'ss- -s • -m � a e �� : 0 » 1 LEGA� DESCRIPTION: �OT 42, BLOCK "A" OF BARBOUR—MG�RROW SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEROF AS RECORDED IN SECTION 8 TON'NSHIP 29 SOUTH RANGE 1 S EAST PINELLAS COUNTY F�ORIDA PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 45, PUBLIC RECOROSS OF PIMELLAS COUNTY', F�ORIDA, LE55 AND EXCEPT iHE > > > f FOLLONANG PORTION OF SAID LOT: U BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER GF SAID LOT AND RUN EASiERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY UNE THEREOF 58.4 FEET THENCE SOUTH 49.2 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT, SAID POINT BEING 64.06 � FEET FF'OM THE SOUTHWESTERLY COkNER OF SAID LOT, THENCE NrESTERLY 64.06 FEET TO SAID �.-� SOUTHWES7ERLY CORNER, THENCE NORTH ALONG TF�E WESTERLY LINE OF SAID �OT TO THE POINT OF �p BEGINNIIVG. /�� o V n � z � Fi 0 N � h d � > � � �-ix m�.n.aa+e Q J C�1 � ~ Q O Yv, T N � /t.5'GMOZIf 41A9 / � � _ (d L U � .a U N F" P ' Q Z � C ►� � sh�aw�ec�, a �``� � p � a c � ai�`OV•na:°a.«�"��r+o m) r axaare socwKa (n � � 3 � ' z a Q � , (� Z rar�ox.un.¢rur � LL v�nan-a.u• �za'x� � a caaa[t[ane swin i�v.i.x�' qWNME M{FT mr[.itv.nw-a.oe' W LL� F Fv PAPAYASTREE7'(F) �TM MV 0.� saun�wv--o.sa• \ U PALMSTREET�� °�-''0Y � uiun wrwaF� (10'��) � uwx wa+w[� � � !'P�C RIP E{EVAII(Y1�a.2Y Z{'MCP dtAR1IGE MIET iW 4EV�MM.�.51' � NptM HV.O.T' ///SNNiMY-SEMqt MIiM1QE •�NKT(TP) EIST MV._O�. �T(D EIEY�MM.l2S' /2�.� I^ N6iMV.--. / v, /7 CWaK1E qM9 / Si091 u�NldE r Ta¢n��-�.ir Natlil INV.-asY FpRq 3�M]'WMPEIE soun�wv.-asa' SCALE: 1"=20' `-9°'<^" `J� . � ,�r M�__,,, y� r�auuExr po ro) \ �r ca+aere wcw.ix wii mknc scn.�am� u•aa rroo'oo'oo�o(aa� tee.eo'�n� ��,.� �" l �„ � e�.ss oF'eeua�s �ee.9r(r') /p, � cwcPErE ca2'r�arsrsn�e a�•�ESr) � 50.��( rwr�m s z r cwa��c \�y p�y � �r/ Q�J Yw1lMFN1'(Na w) �iWM NK Nro q9t(18-�TB) .Q WNOIEtE IiM) 'aw ,�QO �v�r HqiT111E5T CqR�FSf pR LOT 1.BL00(� �OT a'wro rcx¢ �sio�uuw/ac (zr vcsr) a �cwach IOP EI.EVAMM��.19� � a¢ic �i3 � °�T xcatH ixv--aao' cor r.eu�cti a ro.r us» � g y� ��rn�m scun�Mv._auo• � MLT � �\ 5. /BQUMm(TTP) � / � (�v�n ° �"'� � �/ s� .ib (fa Q UNESTORYBUILDING ONISSTORYRG'll,DINC Y R� /� Q qJl&13 #45&J7 � \ � I 11 tan�n[�c ame ' q LL � �� O ��«o•�� .. —W � LOI2,BLOCA.1 RE.Hi1�DERlIf/,IITf1.Bi.(KF.1 ��. �Y �.a LL �� te CGNqiEIE(I.S'EI3T) b � �C/� �' PoRTLON(�i F LOT Q2,BLOCK A �� LEriEND Fcr¢(az�nwix�zr xES7 s woao Fv�cc cm> >i.r W ��oY,� ,s. ��,,,�,z � Q� a �� s zY us*1 r C CNCl�A1ED�(f NDOOO' 342 R wu�(ar xann� �� a vp�naw�e unu(no o) if D OFSCRPIION IFAAIflEYQlf rwno aros ar �� 6t.3�' o.ss'xat � O p 7 m�i � L 'i"Q � d!TOP Oi YMLL 0.5'�lE��KL 0.8Y X 1..35' � � MO NAII MIO � 4.4 � FEZD IEA�F.�H� MNL(0.]J'SWTX) YMG W/ � � � P PIAT IIFA911d1iM cors.xr.ocF.a °�n�� ;�� R �IIEASIIIELLQIf �ri ;� /R COIOfIIONER ,�;F^� e COIIC COIICRETE `�5 yS� � O aFV aeamar ��, Q U H�ID �FRD IM toraasa�ce.a <Z� D Dfl111FICATION M � �BIbMR3 NINiBER "�'""'" y y � OIIIP O�EFMFi�O MFE � W EF ONE STORY BL+lLDING o PSM PROfE590N11 ARVEN7R WO YAPPFR #J23 8 432 n/w ��-MAY lYP ue unm eox w a�hx� � wv ahx vr�v� o� �� DATE OF SURVEY: SEPTEMBER 08, 2012 CERTIFIED T0: BENCHMARKS CONTROL BENCHMARK: FOUND CITY OF CLEARWATER BENCHMARK. BENCHMARK IS I HE�EBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNUER MY w � LOCATED IN THE FRONT OF THE CLEAF'WATER BEACH POST OFFICE. DIRECTION AND MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARD ELEVATION = 4.75' (NaVD88) � � � REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 5J-17 OF THE FLORIDA SuRUEYOR'S IvOTES: � o� � T ADMINISTRATIVE ��ODE. SITE BENCHMARK #t FOUND NAIL AND TAB (NO ID). BENCHMARK IS LOCATED IN 1. THIS SLIRVEY MAP AND/OR REPORT OR THE COPIES HEREOF ARE VOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RA'SED SEAL Z H T THE ASPHALT OF PAPA1'A STREET 29 FEET NORTH 01- THE NORTHW'=ST PROPERTY OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DE'�ETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN T-iE SIGNING N W w - PARTY OR PARTIES ARE PROHIBITED WIl'HOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PF�RTY OR PARTII-S. ; � `� W � CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL ELE:VATION = 4.4E3' (NAVD88) 2, BASIS OF BEARINGS: PLAT BEARING OF N90'00'00°E, ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT—OF—WAY LWE CF PAPAYA STREET, AS SHOWN HEREON. � � 3. THIS OFFICE HAS NOT ABSTRACTED THIS FOR ANY RECORDED CLAIMS OF TITLE EASEMENTS OR RESTRICTIONS. THE PRESENCE OR "� N a � SE tember 1Z, 2012 SITE BENCHMARK //2: FOUND NAIL AND TAB (NO ID). BENCHMARK IS LOCATED IN ABSENCE OF ANY SUCH CLAIMS IS NOT CERTIFIED HEREON. '� r �-. P THE ASPHALT OF POINSLTTA STREET 42 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHE:AST PROPERTI' 4. NO UMDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS OR UTILITIES WERE LOCATED EXCEPT THOSE SHOWN HEREOV. � �"' Christophe� C. Cl�ltt(Jn'] DOtE of Siqnature CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL ELEVATION = 4.42' (NAV088) 5. ELEVATIONS BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM 1988. � PSM ��5167 6. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, NO UNDERGROUND FOUPJDATIONS LOCATED. I