FLD2012-10019; 2100 NURSERY RD � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
r � �e���a��r
. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
s STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: December 18,2012
AGENDA ITEM: D. 1.
CASE: FLD2o I Z-i o019
REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit the expansion of a parking lot serving
existing attached dwellings in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District
with a front (south) setback of 1.5 feet (to pavement) where 10 feet is allowable but
may be varied based on the Flexibility criteria, as a Residential Infill Project as per
Community Development Code Section 2-404.F.
GENERAL DATA:
Agent........................... Chris Weddle,P.E.,Aurora Civil Engineering, Inc.
Applicant/Owner............. Imperial Gardens Company
LoCation.......................... 2100 Nursery Road; north side of Nursery Road, approximately 405 feet west of Belcher
Road
Property Size.................... 12.16 Acres
Future Land Use Plan...... Residential High(RH)
Zoning.......................... Medium High Density Residential (MHDR)District
Special Area Plan.............. None
Adjacent Zoning.... North: Unincorporated Pinellas County
South: Unincorporated Pinellas County
East: Commercial(C)District
West: Low Medium Density Residential(LMDR) District
Existing Land Use............. Attached Dwellings
Proposed Land Use......... Attached Dwellings
, �w .. �`. � .�. �
' � � '��S�d� � � + , ^;
'"�-. � �
� " ` ; �,y�", ,�, � .�a�
,.* . .' � , . r
= ' � ' � r;.t!��v�i "��� ��,� � , � �
'� , n
�` t ;4;� f J � . �± �: �. � .
� Yrj• � �" •� � � � .
..��x _ �' 4 � � �� � �� �' " . �� � 7 I � 1
� i 7 ��e`� /� . �Z �1� .�f. � T .f.!.
i � q w� . .. �1��1 't�� •♦ �/��
i} '� � w '1 . r _ �,�'� -�� r�,",�"�' • � f � ; �� � �
-�� 1 'j �; 1 A E ..��}',�Y� . !�y ,
.`� ' • a� • - - - �`1 `.
•
� ,�a � a� � ��^ts . � � ar �a�� � � "1'+� 4,�
� ,y �
` 'A�_. . � , � ��',�- �� � r �
.� , � � ,�w d `,��,
,,,a. � ,d �� �s"^�ti a� w' i � :
:� - r� V`� +� ' �` �,r ra.rt�y� � � ' .` ' ` �
.� � .1 �� . ,r-.. ` � x
� • • �y�t��1�,�r �� - ,
��� ,� �_ �. 1 �, ��e�� � � �♦ ti�•�WAtiti�� �.�� - + �� i`:
� ( ��+ � � 'a,w'�Lt�
� ' �S�F .. . � '"�+► ' ' - � �''' �� s , , r
.
` q.. " � �'4 y s �� ( j;l � �� � g.
,
�
'�•/^ . .+ � � � -
.
� �� � � � �- '� � �'� - � I � � .�.
� � •�
;
'
. , a �� , *t. '�� 1' , ;�: , m � •
. .,t . � NM�* i � '�, f � ��;
„ `
�
Hj. �� �^ � .,�,� : .,,�.,�..�.,,'. •� � �'�i�%i�J� ,'
, , �,
. _, . •
` �� + � y�.. � . , . , �w �
� �� �;. r� �. .�.Y i !
iti' . .. , .� . �,. - r„i�+ow.awr�.-,. o,
. .
, ,
.
, I � n� � � �' „`�
, �' • 1
�,�°""'r.'.y
- � �i r '�
� ti„ - � � —• . ■ ' ._ ;- 1 I� � . ! �P,,�,.` �
_ � ,. __ , . �� ��'
D. 1.
h
� ���T��`�l Level II Flexible Develo ment lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
P MP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION
u . .. �>°�,�� . _ .
ANALYSIS� •I �OAK GiiOVE DR MORNINGSIDE
� CORONET LN i i
��
Site Location and Existing Conditions: � �� 5:;auit7iS:��?:''�AR.t1•�:� #
-� DIPLOMAT DR ..::, .... p.,'� �
The 12.16 acres is located on the north side of °�����`� �`����������� � � �
i � � :;:;::�.....:.�;::.:.;;';•�::. �
Nurse Road a roximatel 405 feet west of a � ENVOY o �,;.�,R;;&.:_.�a:�,:$;�:;
i i °
rY � pP Y � C7 r--;;�-• .::. .�,� �.,;.,w._ ..:�.,.:,::.<::���::�;;i o
Belcher Road. The subject property is currently � `�"�_ �`��"`;�
j PROJECT :.�•.... •.:�.�-::.�'.. S'`:�.'.:.�.��:�+�::: o
i � SITE •..�.�.•.......... :.:'.:: I•::;�.::��::.�,.� �
developed with 240 attached dwellings and � y "n^` . �°�"�'��"��� °R..:t.:' '.:..::.,,_;;>.:{ '
, y .. .• �'�;:..:..::;�r, �:.::;:::'.:�.:; �
< <•�•�'.� ':��
i cr � .,. .� .4 kt,l[.•_,'r i:..4�5�.{�:':f::--'..
accessory parking. The subject property has 5 � � ;:,:::�.:�_.;�.:�.,.::
785 feet of frontage along Nursery Road, which f IMPERIAL WA� � � ;..;:;�::
� � � �::iF� o j�,:.:...
is a right-of-way of 80 feet in width. The : N��ER� $ RD �R�74 � � ��
existing parking running along the south �; :;:,:::g��:;:?:'Y�';�j o � �
�:��..�:::::..:::.::.::�.:. ._., o �;:.
property line fronting Belcher Road has a ��������'��a��������:���::�>:��:����:;• .=�.� : :�� �:��:
' th f 21.5 feet. :: :.::���� -: ; ;::�;..�.
maximum aisle wid o ':.��:;�[�>,:•n:=:�.. �� ;:;::
;<-,. _.__���
�:::i;:;' g
:���.�,{° `-<>:...;.;,..,:
,#.
�.i'F;��l:r`�;b`s<`�`;-`�:�':_�;?::''�4:
g :�. �� �
��$.' �..Y$. •:.�'�'�' �..;":''_'He�srye
...::... ... .,,: . .: . Hes
:.�:'.:.'�,`:..':�:.',�:.'.��:'...:':;..:.:.;`{�:�ts>;:'�;;:,'::}:::.:<:,J'.;,�. IYqhU- �••.:::.::::.:...�.:•
DevelopmentProposal: � ° � �::�:..:.:��.;;:�::�:�.
�� �
The proposal is to permit the construction of �� �
LOCATION MAP
four off-street parking spaces to reduce the � - :
. . �>::F':;:�:'.;.��;,:s.
- .. :x...:. x._.:...:. : . .:a.F ... .�.. .
deficiency of existing off-street parking. L- - � ���'�:���'::�.���'''������ ��� �������� � .� e
:.:,w.::,:;: ;;: •o•�•, o :;x:3•.S..k;�:�. :c, �� i j
Pursuant to the attached dwelling parking -�� °=:�:�:�.�:�::��:�:�:q�`�p F ��"` � ��.� �
. . � �,
_ � or ..;.w?:�'� ' .�.:A c.#:a�' '�':!.•. Y':: ::�.; :� C.':
re uirements in the MHDR District 480 s aces ��-�� ' - °`��� � �p ��� �� � ���°��� - �
q � P -�__�y ��5.. ".R..S•'�.�,:•���.�...M_:ni:�:.�.; �I
are required and 314 exist. Due to existing site 'a "' _ ���:.. ��� � -� � �� ' -
---�-�,m .,:x�::a �; ���� :��_��
� m._ .:;�.��.�:�.k.�.._ a.� �:�;...�..�:�,:.
conditions prohibiting the addition of parking �'�-�'W��� �������� � � ���������"-�� - � � � _
spaces in other areas in the site, only four !� ���_� .. "� -� ;�' D
s aces are proposed in the existing parking area ��_{ ';�- F ;,� �i�j��
p - C_ M1fDR �W '�,
along the southern property line. s�r_�-i�� � ,�, �W
Pursuant to Communi Develo ment Code ����� '� •� "•°���°°�~• Rs� � y� -
� i
tY P _ -. -�................... -�— -- -
��
,7:;.;� �:e,:;i:::•,�:: :�:..::.. ..
�CDC Section 2-402, the front setback for �;r:.::� :>::::::::::~.:_::�:<;:°.:':'���'='����:�F F x
) .;. .;�:::::...:. ,.::>:;,;...-..:..u�a.�;; � ,� i-----. �
attached dwellings is 25 feet. The existing ;::::.,�s; ,��::-.:�::a;�:.::�:.::: :..:::::���;�:::; a
� �, � ..:
front south setback alon Belcher Road is 1.5 �:��.�:::�:I:����:�::";::�;:��.��;�''�;:.����:;�:����;�'� ' _ ��:
� ) g ..:..:�:�;::.::.:tr,�,:::�.::�- : .�._ ,.
(to pavement) and the proposal is for a 1.5 foot ���.���:�:�:�`::::�:��::°:��":::;:�::����'=- ��
- -�------ �:
setback (to pavement). For this reason, this ZONING MAP
application is being processed as a Level II
Residential Infill Project since the attached dwelling use in the MHDR District does not afford
such flexibility to the front setback.
Other proposed modifications to the existing parking lot include adding curbs around the edge of
the parking lot, expanding the throat of the driveway from 28 feet to 33 feet, removing 48 linear
feet of four foot sidewalk, removing pavement from a landscape island and relocating existing
palm trees. The proposal also includes a new stormwater pond adjacent to the east side of the
proposed parking area.
As all proposed development is restricted to a small portion of the subject property only affecting
the south property line setback, only that section of property will be analyzed and discussed in
the staff report.
Community Development Board—December 18,2012
FLD2012-10019—Page 1 of 5
� Vl���lel Level II Flexible Devel ment lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
� �p DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION
u . �.�.. a"`" ,�. ..
Densitv: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan for the Residential High (RH) land
use category and Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-401.1, the maximum density
of 30 dwelling units per acre would allow for a maximum of 364 dwelling units on this parcel.
There exist 240 dwelling units on the property (19.74 dwelling units per acre), which is
consistent with the above.
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR�, Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan and Section
2-401.1, CDC, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.85. The proposed ISR is 0.520, which is
consistent with the above.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-404, there is no minimum required lot
area or lot width for a Residential Infill Project. However, for a point of comparison, the
minimum lot area requirement for attached dwellings is 15,000 square feet. The existing lot area
for this parcel is 529,690 square feet (12.16 acres). For comparative purposes, the minimum lot
width requirement for attached dwellings is 150 feet. The lot width along Belcher Road is 785
feet. The proposal exceeds these comparative Code provisions for attached dwellings.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-404, the minimum front setback for Residential
Infill Projects can range between 10—25 feet but may be varied based on the Flexibility criteria.
It is noted that for attached dwellings, the minimum required front setback is 25 feet. The
proposal includes a reduction in the front(south) setback to 1.5 feet. Staff recommends approval
of the setback reduction as the reduction will a11ow for additional parking spaces with a setback
consistent with the existing parking area.
Maximum Building Hei� Pursuant to CDC Table 2-404, the maximum allowable height for a
Residential Infill Project (and attached dwellings) can range between 30— 50 feet. The height of
the existing two-story residential building is 28 feet to the top of flat roof, which is less than the
allowable height.
Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-404, the minimum required parking for
a Residential Infill Project (and attached dwellings) is two spaces per unit. The purpose of this
application is to upgrade the site as much as practicable to the current Code requirement of two
spaces per unit (480 spaces). There are currently 314 parking spaces and the additional parking
four spaces will bring the total to 318 spaces. One of these spaces will be a handicap space
meeting Code requirements. The existing driveway is also being widened to the required 24-foot
width.
Sight Visibility Trian� Pursuant to Section 3-904.A, CDC, to minimize hazards at the
existing driveway on Nursery Road, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will
obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-
foot sight visibility triangles. The proposal was reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering
Department and found to be acceptable.
Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-912, CDC, for development that does not involve a subdivision,
all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such
Community Development Board—December 18,2012
FLD2012-10019—Page 2 of 5
� C1�N�L 17�1�\+i Level II Flexible Develo ment lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
p �p DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION
� .... . . ... .
undergrounding is not practicable. The proposal does not include and work related to utilities
and as such undergrounding of utilities is not required.
Landscaping: No additional landscaping is required since the cost of the project is less than 25
percent of the value of the principle structure and the additional parking lot area is less than
4,000 square feet. However, the proposal does include Code compliant landscaping in an
interior landscape island and a row of hedges along the east side of the proposed parking area to
screen the parking area from the view of the apartment building to the east.
Solid Waste: There are multiple dumpster enclosures on the subject property that serve the
attached dwellings. The applicant has proposed no changes to the existing method of waste
collection. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject
property.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards of
the Residential High (RH) future land use plan category and the Medium Density Residential
(MDR) District as per Section 2-401.1., CDC, and Table 2-404:
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
ensity 30 dwelling units per acre 19.74 dwelling units per acre X
(max.of 364 dwelling units) (240 existing dwelling units)
Impervious Surface 0.85 0.52 X
Ratio
Minimum Lot Area N/A 529,690 sq.ft.(12.16 acres) X
Minimum Lot Width N/A 785 feet X
Minimum Setbacks Front: 10—25 feet South: 1.5 feet(to pavement); Xl
60 feet(to existing building)
North: N/A X
Side: 0-10 feet East: N/A X
West: N/A �(
aximum Height 30—50 feet 28 feet(to mid-point of roo fl X
inimum 2 spaces per unit(480 parking 318 parking spaces XZ
Off-Street Parking spaces)
1 A front setback of 10-25 feet is required but may be varied based on the Flexibility criteria.See setback discussion above.
z See analysis in Sta„�'Report.
Community Development Board—December 18,2012
FLD2012-10019—Page 3 of 5
� V�v(al�aLbi Level II Flexible Develo ment lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
p �p DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
°�.,r��.vr..�..•�..��,.r dk� � �
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility
criteria as per CDC Section 2-404.F (Residential Infill Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
l. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X
otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following:
intensity;other development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function X
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regazd to lot width,required setbacks,height,off-street parking access X
or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character
and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General
Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A:
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage,density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. T'he proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community chazacter of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual,acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials
at its meeting of November l, 2012 and deemed the development proposal to be legally
sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the
following:
Findings of Fact
The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the
applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial
competent evidence to support the following findings of fact:
Community Development Board—December 18,2012
FLD2012-10019—Page 4 of 5
' 'V14II�t 1T t�ll.l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT
p pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
� ,.,�� �
1. That the 12.16 acres subject property is located on the north side of Nursery Road,
approximately 405 feet west of Belcher Road;
2. The subject property has approximately 785 feet of frontage along Nursery Road;
3. The site is currently developed with 240 attached dwelling units and 314 off-street parking
spaces;
4. The proposal is to construct four additional off-street parking spaces;
5. The proposal includes a reduction of the front (south) setback to 1.5 feet where 10 feet is
allowable but may be varied based on the Flexibility criteria;
6. The proposal includes landscaping for an interior landscape island and screening of the
proposed parking area; and
7. There is no active Code Enforcement case for the subject property.
Conclusions of Law
The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the
following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-401.1 and 2-
404, Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-
404.F., Community Development Code; and
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two
Approvals as per Section 3-914.A., Community Development Code.
Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of
the Flexible Development application to permit the expansion of a parking lot serving existing
attached dwellings in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a front
(south) setback of 1.5 feet (to pavement) where 10 feet is allowable but may be varied based on
the Flexibility criteria, as a Residential Infill Project as per Community Development Code
Section 2-404.F, with the following conditions:
Condition of A,�proval
1. That a building permit be obtained for the parking lot and landscaping improvements; and
2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Deparhnent may require the
provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an
adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the
developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the
needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe andlor fire pump. If a fire pump is required,
then the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity.
Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staf£
Matt Jackson, Planner II
ATTACHMENTS:Existing Surrounding Uses Map and Photographs of Site and Vicinity
Community Development Board—December 18,2012
FLD2012-10019—Page 5 of 5
9 �
� Y OAK GROVE DR MORNINGSIDE
CORONET LN � 2
�
� � y
z 2
`�C�JRTiS bR 1� �
DIPLOMAT DR ��: _'_ �
c� p �
J � �° �,; �
v ENVOY p , �: �
;
� � � � ; CUF2Tt5� � � � ,
� W � � _ .
_
D S •�
s , _
� U
CT ` ° A���AR/�ND� °{�t'� � , O
� PROJECT � �eQ
U
�� a N
Q ATTAC SITE 8/�R�E�DI�A �� ��`e ; ° '� .��s
Q 0 � a � . � 3
� CT m � ..;�A7,ALfN�4. �F� u.. ��..
¢ w �, ,. �_ ,
�,
0
IMPERIAL T WAY � �
� V �� �
� a; z
�
; � a � pU
NURSERY � RD CR-474
° x � :-: � , W.
4
� o � .
. o �
� o �
OAkADI,A� �p� � O�° �
� �
�, � , �
� . �
� g � � . � �
'.. . . w ' �g@�n
�
� �
� , � ...,.. �
. v . . � ,...:
.
� � �4 "��� � � ��:,
.:::::::�.:�.:
`-� '� oo Preserve"
m �
.;•...::••:•:.:: ...:•..:•...::•;•:.::. ..:•.
— q`, : • ••••.:•.:•:.•..,•..........•..•.::•.•.•.•.:.;.......�..
— ......�.�..�.... .:.. ......•.�.:....�.•... .,
n� �p .}:�i:':��'r;:''d::'.�::i�:::�:':��'•::`:`:::'.:;=����`` Wis IVistaDr ' '
...,
. •.•�.....•:.:•.:r.•::......•........ ....o
, .• .... ..
: . ° : ; . :'::
....�_.J� }�.�.� - �.<n,�°:xow. v 1-�
•�.:•..•.::.•....,-.•.:.iy•..••::.•.....•....:•..•....•.....•...::•.. •...•..:.,...•.,';
'.'.'.::•.::::•:
:'���V
LOCATION
Owner: Imperial Gardens Co Case: FLD2012-10019
Site: 2100 Nursery Road Property Size: 12.16 acres
PIN: 24-29-15-0000-410-0100 Atlas Page: 316B
0 0 ��e•,s �`+ ,� .r .,'�D o �,•� `� .•m•, .
N N 1405 N N .N N ••tV Ne N N ,� �� 4DO
.���^ .. . •�C� N •N N �N
�'��9 'dN .^. . �.• � •��� •• �' '• .• '� v
ii 'u`� ••14oG �S` :�',.`�i' °+'i v'v e 'an:�i�.� °w�•�n^•��{L �p :a• •� �S �
N N 1413 e�C�••h �� .H• � N N .�Y •W�.N .ry.l�L �N •'tFy ��y �y.� a {
:1 z �
� 1417 ��� � 'ad. ' ' � �• :.. . ... . � •. . ..
I wN vw �.}4$P •v'�,•� .� �•��.�•ve �•r�vHO ��.. .�•.;•:� ••,D•�•.:Sr. .
N N 1423 c, �i a .Fi fc3�.#�v� .ry. .cv ,� e r'�•�.
� •9,4P6 v•�AR •�� �
0 1425 •y432e ;�v. v�i.••�'•�O"'� N. ��•�,,°X ����•� ''a..� °"°• •°� ., •�1430 ^ ��i
a�o � �¢i'• �°: 'iy, 'n7e.;K 'c� 'd.v. •.,c�i •N ,ca, c� 14
�°v �°v y 1429 •tid'�a.' ' 1439
m 1435 . '%44 . ..S �.P N•� � ��° .����.�.� .�.•� :�..v�
� .��• :;`hT,'��i. xY. �iY c�',�� ••a '.Fi�.:�° �'`L' '.� ',ty; 1432
� N N �LI 1441
� ;��$ 1444 144q�1 ]1
N N 1453 144q7 L
1478 1451
1459 1480 14� �
'� � 1465 $ 8r� Q 1467 I
N N N ��BG �/y 'I4��
� �L �477
� M�DR = 1481
N N N N 1IS2 V
W
m
N
� � y
� � � � � `� 9�498 1496 1499
N N N N
NURSERY RD
°t�oo° f5°of.° ;�pa° ' ,t5o1� _ „ �
a ...�',�� , .p� m '� 1500 d.
. ���• e • •r'�J°II�. s1 .1J• e°5�.� N N N N �II
.
h
. o .
1505
�J� c�
a . �{
�1•�• N I
...°l33a v ta�13. ° •.�•% e•.� �'.
�.'. ..e��6 4.a .U`28�• • °�F�25,e, °,1�51 • � :ot� ,,•
w. e �� •�' �•�
M.•• e ° � ••:,� • �� �••� . . h��
e •�e ..�f ',�,r e, ' �
;.• . ° � •v;e��'163��' ••,95 :.
,.•�°e •?�•s,,° ° '•,9�1 �� • • °463�.. 1545 •�•°�
. K• oo ��' ..•'.' e v. �� .�. �,
=r=e••` • ��•�r�,465L v. . j54�;�p. �;^
. . , � a ° , :W;•.°..
. . .
. .
.
. .'�4"s. . . . . .
.
, � .
. ...�. • ��e��' 155 °' I
.. :.: e . ::15� ,. :;.;Ii$4�•.�•:: ,.� �,.
I
ZONING
Owner: Imperial Gardens Co Case: FLD2012-10019
Site: 2100 Nursery Road Property Size: 12.16 acres
PIN: 24-29-15-0000-410-0100 Atlas Page: 3168
I
s o .3 •. •
N 1405 �N • N N •.N ' tt�.�N N eN.`�V. N N•N N � Q� W _
157 ,
n h 8 1409 .i1�1d0.�•.: •e'• �• •' ., ...' ,• �• ,• '•. ;°� '• •..,T� 8 �
h h • q •'�••• '~•.a.'ay :�..� �•�•�•^••,�*•'° ;q• " �
o O 14 3 •.a� �•A.'•oec�:�:�n- •an .�• �. g ,a� �•N � �e�.'� � a 4
i�N +�e3 �� , . . e�'!•'m�; sf� Ae. •pt'o - �
•.�;�� • �• � etached Dwellin s • ' • ; � " ;; ;; 8 z �
1417 �� •� ���. ' ' ' '�
e�93 �3x n� '•z�14 0 >> � �ia• �. -reA � �:ny���.� a� I
0 0 � � �.'~`.�' �. a' f �.�ii' N�•.0 r'�a. ,9+ .h �
N N � 1423 •?42Q, ' L
e � 1425� •.M, .«:^' :F��•N�..•w. M �'.�,�'g �b�.{:�'o. '�� ;�.4,�:� '.a: r
� v� ,ze .�• .�,' �, ,t. .. .. .... .T �,.N • :a' .. .� aso
° H 1429 �° � �. 'R. 'sF� �ya .sN .eN ., 1439 Laia
�� ��" Q �=B :_;•� • •' � etached Dwellin s '. . .� p
m . • .��';.• '•� ::� '� . .;� �g:�� u :� � ,�
ise � 1435,n �ad. �• �q jo '� •�F� •:�d•�`Y .t�+��.�:ty •� 432 r
�n �.ga.�45 e m �a�
N W 1441�� � �� p
---+
$ 1447�� "
�
�$� Restaurant �
0 0 1453 I
'�N� Detached 1478 �
h" 'Dwellings ,aso i
g� .,,� � i
N N ,a „� A� Retail Sales
g �
� � �y z1 & Services = ' i
N N N N �49Z C,' I
1 118 119 1p
W �
o ,� ,� ,o, , •_--. �'° m I
° � � m �� Retail Sales tq � �
N N N N N�{9$ 1499
&Services
� � NURSERY RD
p p x & e a � � a �„m,
,° °fSbfY }• 15a1e°.°." .°1500 . �..a ....�. e'��Q�.�= a
'"`,r�•��:Q:., •°° :_�;q,=° ••,s::,"s.� ;:+o,`h � Restaurant 1500 N �^
° �°Q . ° ° N u,m
�•'IS B�° • •'N �-- -� N N
08219
:z.���e: °';;e•o ��"°' etached Dwellin s °'qr' �—J N
..���2 i�,�.• • ;°. , N
°,``.��� .1535=' '.. ��5�o� •�•'�'•`�5��.. J .
�` ,. �.: . � 4 .•) ' ttached Dwellings , .�
{y'` • ..�•° �° •T • • �'e
. •• .,s•; �..:.•, e :oz°, .. �:• �1619,.
. • °���y`/y .a'.
�;•e°:• e..•�1 .' �..I ••li.", • •.....1 . ..
�a0,: . ;43, ••• :° .:,,�• � �'�'l'; 1545„ °,:
.?"�. °e°.
°•N:'�� �' :�° .�l — a: ': ... �' �°:�
� `r°� ' =�1 =u'� •"�'• °,.�.�9�6e •'•s �.• i��`i��r°
°.e.'. �,��; . . .....ai � . �
•,1 � �6se ,e , •� � _ �
' .. .••�45 �:�....e. ..a•� •.�6�. Lo��ss � 155 .. ..
,. ,^ .• •�, �' :•.��:::•::: :.'i5rf5';�:: °'�° '.
.;
� .t58 :.5:•.:.:::: :•a.;;:;.•.:
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Owner: Imperial Gardens Co Case: FLD2012-10019
Site: 2100 Nursery Road Properfy Size: 12.16 acres
PIN: 24-29-15-0000-410-0100 Atlas Page: 3168
r
,� � � -� ,�: - , �
► �
,. � • � ;,� � , ,; , �� ,F � � �
�.�,. -�� t �, , � � _ � i �
� r.. �. i � .
• �,.
� 's i_ . ' � �-
� Y �� � ��l�,{ y� � :l , ' �1
` F �' � ...�i- �' I �.'! �+ ���, ��� . T�..' � � ` �
. �,,�--"1 � �.%t� � yjt ,k.Y �, �'
�� � `
� � j
�a� �
s �
.
�,;�..�..` ` ' � . � •.�
7 •
�-r�F ,. . * , � l�1LI�Y�I`�rl:�� � � r �,� � '
;; r. + r , � � ►`. �+ � `� I_ - ¢ ;:
� l !� '��''W�.� r ,� ���`
��' ��� � . - _ �"T� , � � ��� �. •
+ + l� . �" � j �7+ 1 _ '��y+1� 1 ~* � .��� r I
�• �A� / Y+. �I � �M ��
. � �. ��� 4 � �R* � *A . J. � ��.f_.'/ � � 11
J r }�
€' � ...� � � •� "+"�t�i�� �� '^ �� I�..
x'fd v '. _ ,�. i.�11
t ~' �1 �� */.�`t�:. r , � � ' .A., t..
.� _� , • +� . � . . ; ,
., , . ,�,,,�.�,�,��� ,
�� . r.. / .�„ �� � �1�. ;. �I � •+�!':
_ � , • t �
1 �� . � � _ �� _
y �+ :� �l
�° , sp •. .. . , ,� I ,1 �l . � � �
l� � " 1�; �� 5' � . . � . �'(,.
j��d "�Wk'` .. � � v �` �u � 1 1
� � �.�i�, � �� ,�. ��s � ��� r ��y,� ..
-n� �. � :ni.. .- �...�.. � � �n � .,'cua,m,.�� �� I �%t�I�J �r ��..*..T�.',:
� , ��� � r.: d. , � ..
. .� _ � � .. � y �-:E , �� ' W .. .�( .�•M 1 �
•.
� A . �t+w.+�Mw—..r..P�rw a
V i ` •� � ' � � � ��
�1'J��jy IY t'
� '�.� i � • . � ��'}!. 1 r������ '� x}y� ` ��
w �. � ��Y I
�, 3 �_� I . � � + �� . . -rc� ' -
,�. � �., � �� i�� �
.'� . ' .. • • —
� - '� ,� ��
� �`= , �-
� o �� � �
� �� . ,�. �t .��. w. ��t�,��,
, ` �- � " � ' � "'rn
-, ' ,� -,
. ' �'-�, �
" ,�,� � � `�
_ ,�,
; , , � �ev
;y� x ,
AERIAL
Owner: Imperial Gardens Co Case: FLD2012-10019
Site: 2100 Nursery Road Property Size: 12.16 acres
PIN: 24-29-15-0000-410-0100 Atlas Page: 316B
� ' � � vM1
� �•
'w � p
. 'r '� ��� � � � ��,�•i
,a -�. �
-w-k � _ �A
�q���ll'� �i, •�� :���
� ,,,.�;,1 ' t ,� ,
c� ° � -,,i,�,5� y,:, „�� �,..`
,�,�. �
i An l �
M �k'���,(v
�, \,� V , . �
,� �� .
t' '�, 1:
N,�,+
,ii��. . ..... . ,r. .. . . . _. ' "° ' � ` ;r n ' 4t .s. �. ��}
' :
� , a "r, �c y�;e*?? �����, ' �, � 'ra,`l,,x"./ rF .� Yt`3 r � :�''"4.r,.
;! ,�. . + �I L�t.�/S: � �,�j .� �5i'•;t, �}{ l jt� PYr t,�'.� .�,. r;i
,r � ' k A � �
View looking north at the primary development area on View looking west at the primary development arca.
the east side of the parking lot.
� , � ` �� ,��. -
i, � a ,.,,,: -;r
Pr �� _ 1 �
-_,��-- '
� ,n
I �•
.. . I! i;�-. } . � '
` � �
f �f" - ., q i'il 1 r A-:—■
.+ h .
` —-� y •�i �, " � i��{.� ►' �
,�� F,.�� t,, c.. ..�: -
' �_1";... _
—.�.,...._
=�<•
�
:
,, �„-; . . . .- ' .-' �
. --
-
, . � .
t :..•'
� �.�,.+'
. � '�� �.
View looking northeast at the primary development View looking east at the development area.
area and adjacent building.
��� � ' - ,.
,.�;,: :;,
;,
,.: . ,:
�.- _
-.,,,;. , _. ,- ., , , , _
...�.R, s _ �.��r .. 4
, a� . .v �... � i
,i
t
� �
i .i i
�I��'
4vk` `$ �
»�y,�' ' '
_�� ��h . R r yz ' F �4 • aFr ��
3 .. .N�. 1 3 J A 'l� �1� � ` y . .
. F.� '�-•..� tq♦ i' l `'�t�s L� a' �Y
� � '- ' .. ..:...F�r.r:ir� �- � _i�i,,,,�.c, . i� �,� �„��. '��1' �+
� ^-.'i�nt��F'1... ,`Y�h•i �','3�*,1 }�yy� �11.��•����.S�� .
. . -r��►j�..���t''�y� ?.t�t t,�''.v��tk'�� •M�@ r�:-a.li.
.'"t ., i.i, Sf'+ `�`ii..(.��
View from the soufh property line looking west. View trom the south property line looking east.
2100 Nursery Road
FLD2012-10019
Matthew Jackson
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater,Florida 33756
(727)562-4504
matthew.iackson(u�mvclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
❑ Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2011 to Present
October 2008 to June 2010
Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and
regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and
variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of
development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning
assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning
ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review
committees,boards,and meetings.
❑ Planner I
Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007
Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances.
In-depth government agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained
submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead
project kick-off ineetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting
documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject
matter such as zoning, land uses, densities, available public utilities and land development costs.
Member of emergency mitigation committee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or man-made
disasters affecting Calvin, Giordano and Associates and local municipalities.
❑ Manager
Church Street Entertainment, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 2004
Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment
complex including 100+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and
inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and
delivering deposits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, marketing
and special events.
❑ Linguist
USArmy, Fort Campbell, KY October 1991 to October 1995
Maintain fluency in the Arabic language and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military
readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering
operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian
authorities. Interpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison
between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training.
EDUCATION
❑ Master of Arts,Urban and Regional Planning,Florida Atlantic University,2007
❑ Bachelor of Arts,Urban and Regional Planning,Rollins College,2004
�
` /
C / �/ / L E N G3 / N E E R / N 4, / N C..
November 8, 2012 07-124
Mr. Matthew Jackson, Planner II
City of Clearwater
Planning and Development
100 South Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater,FL 33756
RE: Imperial Gardens,Building H—Parking Lot Modification
' FLD2012-10019--2100 Nursery Road
Dear Matt
In accordance with DRC comments of October 30,2012;please find attached the following revised items and
responses for our Flexible Development Application for the above referenced site.
1. (15)revised Flexible Development Applications;
2. (15)copies of the letter of authorization,
3. (15)revised site plans,
4. (15)copies of site survey;
5. (15)copies of the drainage and geotechnical reports.
Responses:
Engineering Review:
- 1. Truncated domes have been specified on sidewalks adjacent to construction area,
2. Noted(5-sets of signed&sealed as-builts will be required),
3. Noted(DRC is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review),
Environmental Review:
1, Noted(DRC is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review),
F'rre Review:
l. Noted(No changes to site affecting fire department assess or water supply),
2. Noted(No changes to site affecting fire department assess or water supply),
Land Resource Review:
1. Plans have been revised per discussions with Matt Anderson,
2. Noted, (DRC is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review),
3. Plans have been revised per discussions with Matt Anderson,
Planning Review:
1. Existing building height(s)have been added to site plan and application,
610 E.Morgan Street • Brandon,FL 33510.4607
813.643.9907 • Fax: 813.643.9917
-
2. The locations of the relocated or replaced palms with a 10 foot clear trunk have been added to the
plan,
3. Landscaping had been added to the interior island where pavement is being removed,
4. A hedge has been specified along the east side of the proposed parking,
5. Additional annotation has been added to indicate the property line; legend updated as well,
Stormwater Review:
1. Attenuation volume has been provided in addition to the treatment volume,
2. Proposed pond design has 6"of freeboard and the bottom is 18"above the seasonal high ground water
elevation,
3. The proposed pond is designed without an outfall and therefore is designed to the 50-year storm event,
4. Noted, (DRC is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review),
Tra�c Engineering:
]. . Noted, (DRC is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review),
Please feel free to call me at(813) 643-9907 with any questions.
Sincerely,
Auror� ivil Engineering,Inc.
�,"J,
�
r
C I eddle,P.E.
President
-
.
� � �� ���I i��t.. f`�,����1��,�1
'saai� ���.[
�� �` � �a.r�i�i':;�a, '`.zset�s�'.ai<.�iis.d �a�+,�1�
� .
Phone: (919)926•3D96
;� I'acsimite: (4I9J 84b-5&I4
� Eniait:jhlaitman@ricertrestrealty.com .
�
Via Emai�
'°,;
Septe,mber 4, 2012 �
To �liom It b�ay Coneern:
Please consider t6is letter authorization £or Chris Weddle, P.E. of Aurora Civil
Engineering, Iiic. to'act as agent; for Imperial Properties, LLC for the gurpases af
applying for and obtaining requirecl permits for tl�e p�rking lot modifications for
our facility at 2100 Nursery Road, Clearwater, FL, Parcel ID #24-�9-15-Ot�040-
410-01d0. °
Plcase feel free to contacC tve sl�ould you have questions regarding tlie foregoing.
Very truly yours,
Jason ILlaitman
Authorized Agcnt far Tniperial Properties,LLC
STATE OI�'N�RTH GAROLTNA
COUNTY OF�AKE
I certify tl�at the following person(s)personally appeared before me this
day, each acknowledging to me that I�e or slie signed tlie foregoing documentc
name{s) of principals.
Date: �� ,�}�•c�C�l�.
t f
(Of�cial Seal)
(ufficial signatur�o notary)
.�`'��TtNEI'''�.
.�` P�S l. '�.
; � �o-,
. c, ,
= N°r'�9�p� ��,p.,�y r.v� �,.. C �G �n 2.
w� ������1r� �' {notary's printed name
�x ,�y ¢
"v�,`y LBLIG �V;
.
����.9�cO�N�����`,
�'��t„����t+�''
o Planning&Development Departm ent
� C earwater Flexible Develo mentA lication
p PP
� Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses
IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE,
INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPIICATION.
ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY,AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON(NO FAX OR DELIVERIES)
TO THE PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE.
A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS(1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES)AS REQUIRED WITHIN
ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL
AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED,STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS.
THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200
APPLICATION FEE: $1,205
PROPERTY OWNER(PER DEED): Imperial Gardens Co
MAILING ADDRESS: 8816 Six Forks Road, Suite 201 Raleigh, NC 27615-2983
PHONE NUMBER:
EMAIL;
AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Chris E.Weddle, PE
MAILING ADDRESS: 610 E.Morgan Street Brandon, FL 33510
PHONE NUMBER: 813-643-9907
EMAIL: chris@auroracivil.com
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2100 Nursery Road,Ctearvvater, FL 33764
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 24-29-15-00000-410-0100
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Beg at SW wr of NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 run N 40 ft E,86.01 FT to POB,Thence N 27 Deg W 142.53 ft,thence N 493 FT MOL
to N Une of S 1/2 of NE 1l4 of SE t!4 Thence E 860.65 FT S TO N Bndy of Nursery RD,thence W along said Iine to POB
PROPOSED USE(S): Apartment Complex
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Modify existing parking lot in front of building"H"of the Imperial Gardens Apartments to:
Specifcally identiJy the request (1)Construct 3 new parking spaces and a drive aisle, (2) Remove above grade planter&a dd a
(include all requested code flexibility; parking space,(3)Remove above grade planter&convert space into full size landscape island,
e.g., reduction in required number of
porking spaces, height, setbacks, lot �4)Remove 48 LF of 4'sidewalk. (5)Construct treatment sump for 1/2"of runoff for new
size,lot width,specifrc use,etc.J: impervious areas.
Planning 8�Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562•4865
Page 1 of 8 Revised 01112
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO(total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: 0.517
Proposed: 0.520
Maximum Permitted: 0.85
DENSITY(units, rooms or beds per acre): BUILDING HEIGHT:
Existing: �9•7 Existing: 2•STORY
Proposed: �9•7 Proposed: 2-STORY
Maximum Permitted: 30 Maximum Permitted: 30-40 FEET
OFF-STREET PARKING:
Existing: 314
Proposed: 318
Minimum Required: 480(2/unit)
WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPlETION? $15,000
ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY:
North: 2 LMDR lots,otherwise not in City zoning
South: Southeast parcel is MHDR, otherwise not in City zoning
East: C
West: LMDR
STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS T�/
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this � day of
representations made in this application are true and p�ToBC�E'_
accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize / ��•to me and/or by
City represe tives to visit and photograph the Ch 'riS�c,���'/' C'Ue���� ,who is personally known i�s�-
property de ibed in this ap lication. � �
w�N'� Notary PuNic Sta of Fbrid
:r .' Stephen G Co tt
"""� My Commisaion E 178855
Sign ure of property owner or representative N public,
y commission expires: �aCCJ��
Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel;727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865
Page 3 of 8 Revised 01/12
o Planning&Development Department
� C earwater Flexible Develo mentA lication
P pP
U Site Plan Submittal Package Check list
IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT(FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE
PLAN SUBMITTAI PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS:
❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the
subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide
these responses.
0 Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914,A, The attached Flexible Development Application
General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses,
❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property,
dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including
official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site.
O If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as
provided in F.S. §723.083,the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5.
❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar
marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional
engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair
or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on
private and commercial docks.
❑ A site plan prepared by a professional architect,engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals
50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information:
❑ Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon.
C1 North arrow,scale, location map and date prepared.
O Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases,
O Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard
Area,and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE)of the property,as applicable.
O Location,footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site.
❑ Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site,with proposed points
of access.
O Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and
seawalls and any proposed utility easements.
O Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed
stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit.
0 Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection.
❑ Location of off-street loading area,if required by Section 3-1406.
❑ All adjacent right(s)-of-way,with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections
and bus shelters.
O Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building
separations.
0 Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials.
Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Te�:727•562•4567; Fax:727-562-4865
Page 4 of S Revised 01/12
❑ Typical floor plans,including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage.
❑ Demolition plan.
❑ Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally
sensitive areas.
❑ If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the
difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space),then a parking demand study will need to be
provided. The findings of the study wiil be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are
approved.Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information.
O A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying
those trees proposed to be removed,if any.
❑ A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and
condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff.Check with staff.
❑ A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more
of the following conditions:
■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour(directional trips, inbound or outbound on the
abutting streets)and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day;or
■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to
unacceptable levels;or
■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve
month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided
by the City of Clearwater Police Department;or
■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review
process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments
with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors.
❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use;or an existing use is improved
or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's
current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional
landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information, if
not otherwise required in conjunction with the appiication for development approval:
O Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including
botanical and common names.
❑ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species,size and location, including drip line.
0 Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square
feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and
vehicular use areas.
❑ Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences,
pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines,
sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features
that may influence the proposed landscape.
❑ Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape
islands and curbing.
❑ Drainage and retention areas,including swales,side slopes and bottom elevations.
❑ Delineation and dimensions of ali required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any.
Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearvvater,FL 33756,Tel:727•562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865
Page 5 of 8 Revised 01112
o � Planning& Development Department
� C earwater Flexible Develo ment A lication
P pP
� General Applicability Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX(6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL,THE
CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL.
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent
properties in which it is located.
Existing Buildings/Site - No buiiding changes proposed. The addition of 4 parking spaces to
the 12 acre site will not affect the harmony, bulk, coverage and character of the 240 unit
apartment complex.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings
or significantly impair the value thereof.
Existing Buildings/Site - No significant changes proposed. The addition of 4 parking spaces to
the 12 acre developed apartment complex will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development
and use of the adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair their value.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of the proposed use.
Existing Buildings/Site - No significant changes proposed. The addition of 4 parking spaces to
the 12 acre developed apartment complex will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
Existing Buildings/Site - No significant changes proposed. The additional parking spaces will
improve traffic congestion.
S. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
Existing Buildings/Site - No significant changes proposed. The addition of 4 parking spaces
is consistent with the surrounding community character.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of
operation impacts,on adjacent properties.
Existing Buildings/Site - No significant changes proposed. The addition of 4 parking spaces
to the 12 acre apartment complex should pose adverse effects on the adjacent properties.
Plannfng&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562•4567; Fax:727-562-4865
Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12
o Planning & Development Department
� C earwater Flexible Develo ment A lication
p PP
� Flexibility Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(5) BEING REQUESTED AS SET
FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S)IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW,IN DETAIL,EACH CRITERION
IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL(USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY).
1 The proposed parking spaces do not affect the intensity or other development standards.
Z, The proposed parking spaces will not reduce the fair market value of the
abutting properties. The parking spaces front Nursery Road.
3, The parking spaces are an allowed use within the district.
4. The parking spaces are compatible with the adjacent land uses.
5, The addition of the parking spaces should upgrade the immediate vicinity of
parcel; overflow vehicles should no longer be parking in the drive aisle.
6, The design of the additional parking spaces meets the development criteria of the City of
Clearwater. Rernoved overflow parking from the drive aisles and allowing then to
park in a parking space will improve the overall function and aesthetics of the site.
,. The addition of the 3 parking spaces does not affect the lot width, req'd setbacks
or height requirements of the parcel. The net affect to the off-street parking
are as noted in item # 7 above.
$,
Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865
Page 7 of 8 Revised 01/12
�� U � �c� �'� �r,'2...4 �l��
S ee ��
o Planning&Development Department
� C earwater Flexible Develo ment A lication
p PP
� Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed—PRINT full names:
Imperial Gardens Co
2. That(I am/we are)the owner(s)and record title holder(s)of the foilowing described property:
Imperial Gardens Apartments at 2100 Nursery Road, Clearwater, FL
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for(describe request):
Parking lot modifications.
4. That the undersigned(has/have)appointed and(does/do)appoint:
Christopher E. Weddle
as(his/their)agent(s)to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Ciearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described
property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representadves in order to process this application and the owner
authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That(I/we),the undersigned authority,hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner Property Owner
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS
BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED,AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA,ON
THIS DAY OF , , PERSONALLY APPEARED
WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN
DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED.
Notary Public Signature
Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires:
Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Ciearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567; Fax:727•562-4865
Page 8 of 8 Revised 01/12
IMPERIAL GARDENS— PARKING LOT EXPANSION 11/6/12
Design Hydrograph Calculations:
Design Frequency 50-yr Detention areas without outfalls
Tc 1-hour (Min)
I 4 in/hr (per IDF Curve,Zone 6 for 50-yr, 1 hr)
�C 0.68 (per"C" calcs attached)
Basin Area 1,840 SF (0.0422 AC)
Runoff Volume:
�Q=OCIA=0.68(4 in/hr) (0.0422 ac)=0.115 CFS
Volume @ 1 HR: 0.115 CFS (60)(60)(1) =414 CF
ModRet analysis (attached) demonstrates 414 CF applied over 1 hour provides the following:
DHW= 19.30FT@3.06hours
Recovery of Pond at 13.84 hours
Max infiltration rate= 15.625 ft/day
,,���o���r�,,,�
oe� �,�C,p.E. * .,
�o OQ �..... �� `�e�,�
!' .•
o `V • �. �'�e `:�
.
���p �O �� � S� ����
� �V s � 4' ��'�'� �
� �Y f,e,f * � �• x.� �
�. t-�-� � —. J �
�:,G . . �„ .
• � f1a� :
�..�. 2 Q �,
9 �
'y '
M'�` ••• ���( ��o����
Y J
"'°y� • ��••'�✓b�r.
� PR�Y,��-`
e...a.��
MODRET
SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS
PR07ECT NAME : Imperial Gardens
MANUAL RUNOFF DATA USED
UNSATURATED ANALYSIS INCLUDED
Pond Bottom Area 90.00 ftz
Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL 236.00 ft3
Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) 2.80
Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base 12.40 ft
Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table 17.40 ft
Elevation of Starting Water Level 18.90 ft
Elevation of Pond Bottom 18.90 ft
Design High Water Level Elevation 19.90 ft
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis 0.25
Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity 32.00 ft/d
Factor of Safety 2.00
Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity 30.00 ft/d
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis 0.25
Avg. EfFective Storage Coefficient of Pond/Exfiltration Trench 1.00
Hydraulic Control Features:
Top Bottom Left Right
Groundwater Control Features - Y/N N N N N
Distance to Edge of Pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Elevation of Water Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
impervious Barrier- Y/N N N N N
Elevation of Barrier Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MODRET
TIME - RUNOFF INPUT DATA
PROJECT NAME: IMPERIAL GARDENS
STRESS INCREMENT VOLUME
PERIOD OF TIME OF RUNOFF
NUMBER (hrs) (ft3)
Unsat 0.56 33.75
1 0.25 103.50
2 0.50 103.50
3 0.75 103.50
4 1.00 103.50
5 36.00 0.00
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROJECT NAME : Imperial Gardens
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (cfs) RATE (cfs) (ft3)
00.00 - 0.00 17.400 0.000 *
0.00000
0.00 17.400 0.02366
0.03093
0.81 19.098 0.03820 0.00
0.04268
1.31 19.211 0.03868 0.00
0.03269
2.06 19.276 0.03020 0.00
0.02690
3.06 19.304 0.02624 0.00
0.00246
13.84 18.900 0.00
Maximum Water Elevation: 19,304 feet @ 3.06 hours Recovery @ 13.839 hours
*Time increment when there is no runoff
Maximum Infiltration Rate: 15.625 ft/day
INFILTRATION : IMPERIAL GARDENS
440 _ _ _ _ _
420 '
400 _ _
380 _ ' '
360 _ _ __ __
340 _
320 __ _ ,
,� 300 _ _
� 280 _ _ _
a�i 260 _
�
� 240 _
� 220 _
a� 200
� 180 _ _
� 160 _ _
140 _ _ _ .
' 120
100 - -
80
60 _
40
20
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Time (hrs)
Total Volume Infiltrated = 448 ft3
1NFILTRATION : IMPERIAL GARDENS
�
�
�
�
0
�
c�
>
a�
w
a� I
�.
c�
�
19-
, � � �
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1£0 11 12 13
Time (hrs)
Max Water Elevation = 19.30 ft
POnd VOlume Calc Treatment Volume
;,�wr�c� � Incr. = To�l �� Total����� Area 4sf� �/���S/o�{C�� � Af :
Elev. � Ai�e�; , Volurrie ; vaiume volume �1840.Cf0 76.7 OA018
{fe�t : ��F�= , ;,�cub�c ft,}, cubic ft.� tacre it,.j
-���, , r o.o a.o o.0000
-� � ;' , a.a o.o o.000a
O.Q 0.0 Q.OQt}0 Interpolate Treatment Elev
a.o o.o a.aaoo
0.0 0.0 O.00OU �leuatian �r�a (sf) Area (ac)
'��'��� .,,::'.. ._ .�aV����., G�.7.L Yi,7w7.� V.iJ 1 I 1 .:.��� .y, .�F��i'1►LIVV- V.VV�JY
����� �.: _,� ���.s �ss.� o.aos4 ����.3�g� x��.s7aa o.aoss
. ���. �,�'��«�,. 78.4 78.4 O.Q018 �� '1$�90 ' 9�.t14��' O.Od21
Bottom�_ > �.., ��
fi�:9� ` �q. ',
Treatment Volume Elevation
'�.��� „��`` � - " 76.9 76.9 0.00�i 8 Use� 1.�»4 :
B��Orn� � r��� � ����
CN & "C" Calculation cN ��C��
AC SF Coefficients:
' Basin Are�= 0.00 1,840.Q0 CN C
Totai imperious Area ,�;� ���lq , : '�,��1.�p`t� ' Impervious CN = �� "t�.89
Pond/UVetland Area ` � ��t� j x 4�1�at��" Pond/Vl/etland CN = 1 t�0 ��t1p
Penrious Area (1) - t��00 ' �19�:�0 Penrious CN (1)= 8� �}.�0
Pervious Are�(2J ' fl:0�; , Pervious CN (2) _; F' �'� ,.,.. �.18'
Weighted Curve Number= 0.0 0.88
DELTA�N or C= ' 0',CI U.�8''
Pre-Developed Curve Nurnber r ; �0;°00 = 'Ci.20'
INC.
GEOTECHNfCAt 6 MATERIALS
ENGtNEERlNG,TESTiNG b JNSPECT/ON
May 30, 2012
Rivercrest Realty Investors
8816 Six Forks Road
Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27615
Attn: Mr.Jason Klaitman
Subject: Proposed Drainage Swale
Imperial Gardens Apartments
2100 Nursery Road
Clearwater, Hillsborough County, Florida
Test Lab Project No: 12-3705
Dear Mr. Klaitman:
Test Lab, Inc. (Test Lab) has completed one (1) Double-Ring Infiltrometer(DRI) test and one (1) hand auger
boring at the Imperial Gardens Apartments located at 2100 Nursery Road, Clearwater, Hilisborough County,
Florida. These tests were performed within the proposed limits of the drainage swale.
One (1) DRI test was conducted in accordance with ASTM Procedure D-3385. One (1) hand auger
boring was performed to an approximate depth of 5 feet to evaluate the seasonal high water table
(SHWT). The soils encountered were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System
(USCS) and are shown on the attached Soil Profile. The locations of the DRI test and hand auger boring
may be found on the attached Field Test Location Plan.
The data obtained from the DRI test indicates that the infiltration rate of the soils encountered at the
location of DRI-1 is approximately 16 inches per hour.
At the time of this study, the water table was not encountered. The United States Department of
Agriculture "Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida" indicates that the shallow soils at the Imperial
Gardens property are composed of Adamsville soils and Urban land, 0 to 5 percent slopes. According to
the soil survey, the seasonal high ground water table for Adamsville soils and Urban land, 0 to 5 percent
slopes is at approximately 2 feet below natural ground surface elevation, from June to November during
normal years; the permeability rate ranges from 6 to 20 inches per hour. Based on a review of soil sampled
from boring P-1, the estimated SHWT is approximately 3 feet. Considering fiil has been added to this site for
P.O. BOX 15732 • TAMPA, FLORlDA 33684 � PHONE(813)872-7821 • FAX(813)872-1876
Report of Double Ring Infiltrometer Test and Seasonai High May 30, 2012
Imperial Gardens- Proposed Drainaae Swale Test Lab Proiect No.: 12-3705
development, the estimated SHWT from our boring appears to be consistent with the Web Soil Survey
SHWT estimation for this site.
Test Lab, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to be of service. Should you have questions concerning this
information, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Test Lab, Inc.
Jeanne Berg, P.E.
Florida License No. 50699
Copies Submitted: (2) Client
Enclosures: Field Test Location Plan
Soil Profile(P-1)
Soil Legend
� � ,�;; ..� .
�m���� y` � � �
� � � .
� APPROXIMATEHAND .. ` �y ��� '�
AUGER LOCATiON �
e. . 9 /�.jt��., � .,,,�..��. � � .,.
�
�:�t a.
6\9�. �� � ',:A�����\ i� ��� I
.�
APPROXIMATEDRI � "'�
��
<. � �„ ,. Y�.�. , ,. °'a.� fe�� >.. �r,�
O IOCATION > .. � � �- � , : fv? " .�.� ... . �_.. ,.f.n,�� �" � ��� � �
Uc .h�� ev�"` �a� Y� ��
. >. _ � � �.. ...., a..,
. . . ,,.,�.J..��.. y. ...
���" �' �;..
�a�;: �.,... :...
� `�����,�__ _' _..
� _
��,,,, .,,.�
�
. '. .• r � � � �
� ,
„ � ; �
� ,� : I
�� �� � � � I
�
�:. � �� �- , '. � a
e
� � � � ��
�� � � � ` � �� �.�z
q ` � � � �a
�' �
�
�: � �
�; . �, a ,��F
� �y
�� � ��:. � �; � � ' � ,�,
,�, �� � ,j��,,,��"�"�`' -���� �
� ���
�.
� �
i
�,�, �'� � ``� �� �_ 3� � �"' � ��
�-
SA���' - � , ,r' _
�
I �. � �;- ,
� �
c, �� :� �: �°� � � �,�,,, �� "
��� ��,r �� � �� ;
x �� `" � �� ar/vi" �
� ��� �� �� ��
� � .. �. �� ���� '���
� .. �� ��
� � � � �
o , - dr �`� �,��.,.p� , �
� _�'. .1 _��. . _' '.- a\ .�_�,� .. �:. . .��. .�; �,�� ��'� - �i �t� s�s ,'
, �
���b_� `�� �y �v �y
° ..•.: „ ,. . .�� �.
r . _.�o . . . ,�
,: 'l�ly' �F %
� � �
�m �c�
�_ -;.�yq�,��.'�.� ,�✓*��.'.. „90 ,.: _ �� . � � ?
m �
n � �X.. MW 38�'K Ys-.�� � � .
3 . . ,.,sg .Wf.. �:�
x � '> �
- �� � � s�r s
a � � �� �
° �'��. ,�� r " �� � �� . �. �� i yi � "� ��h
� ��� � � �� � �� '.� a .. � ,��,n
= � �
m ''
m r �"� .<, v� ,,;
� �
�«"�c �'�rota� '�. .
�,n�. - _ .. � �=. .
�
� ����
s
y
m ��m��� .. - _ . .
a . .� . . �.. _ .
4�
r
� . ... t�uc � ' -� � � �;
� � �� x�
cw�.«m„+,-esr,.,,i�.-in:� �,m � ? � �x
a � � � � �� ��� .
�f-' f �"
g �.,....�.� `" L''� � �'� �y'�� y r i �� si
� � � ' ,
� ��"��: � �
E �
Imperial Gardens � � �� � `� ����� �
� 2100 Nursery Road �� - ��i:: � �� � � � � � '= �
� Clearwater,FL �� '� s
� � 'r�,g� �- �"� �y� � ,a t �'� ���
�
a , y �'.' �`� �; �� � � l'
'� �GE12-3105 � �: � ': . .� s .:.�.b+,+ ..'t����,. . ��e a�' � 'y,�� 3in, � �Vi41, � ����
� ^
£ ...��. °��.�G d ' -_ � � .... .. .... >�!�-.em,e ".. �.�:'�''�.
�
f�k !
{�
�� _ �
F_`.; , i✓6:. . .� , .
n w. __4. . .,_ ,.>�., s�a�a..�.=, <_:; � . m� .., . . -�,iw.. '. .�:,� ��.,�be . v��
� May 30,2012 �
" �"ss�"° FIELD TEST LOCATION PLAN
�� �
LEGEND
SOIL PROFILE
O � Gray to Brown to Very Pale Brown SAND to SAND
With Silt(SP/SP-SM)
P-1
A-Trace Roots
W ~
W
� 0 O � � SP Unified Soil Classification System(ASTM D 2488)
Z . . 1A Z Group Symbol As Determined By Visual Review
� GNE Groundwater Table Not Encountered
� � , O a � Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater
� W 5 5 W
' o 0
R
R
�
�
z
U
�
E
�
�
9
$
S 11z Pw�en/l�w 0[b
� rrr�
�
g YYG �
a �[OtfG�C�[YIiqEYet
� AaM.M�4:4i�:f�W
O
�g Notes:
a '^""" 1. The prolpes depicteA are of a general¢ed nature to highigM the major
- subsurface straUfication features aM mateiial characterktics.The soi
Imperial Gardens proties indude soil description,stratlflcatbns and penatratlon resktances.
2f 00 Nursery Road The stratlficatlons shown on the borirg profYeS repesent the cabMbns
� Clearvrater,R onty at the actual borirg bcatbn.Variatbns may occur and should be
expecteE between boring bcations.The stratlficatiorx represent the
approximate boundary behveen subsurface materials ard the acWal
9 transitlon may be gretluel.
g �GE12d105 2- Groundwater lavels gene211y fluctuate durin9 periods of prdwged drtxght
a arM extended 2intaq a�may be aRected by man+nade influences.In
� �uay w.miz 2 addiGOn.a seasonal etkct wil also ocwr in wh�ch higher g,ourWwater
riw io s� levels w lemP��Y Oerched condttbns are rortr�aly recaded in ralny
seasons.
SOIL SYMBOLS
SAND CLAY SHELL
Clayey SAND Gravelly CLAY Silty SHELL
� Gravelly SAND Sandy CLAY COQUINA
� `�'
t .:} Shelly SAND Shelly CLAY MUCK/PEAT
l
.�:?'
�.
;':
Silty SAND �" � ' Silty CLAY CAVITY
,`
g;;
_. �._:.
SILT GRAVEL SOFT LIMESTONE
,�`�
Clayey SILT ; � Clayey GRAVEL HARD LIMESTONE
,
�F
E
_�.i
Gravelly SILT Sandy GRAVEL ORGANIC SAND
� �'',
5rv.
Sandy SILT � �:�t Shelly GRAVEL DEBRIS/TRASH
s °•::,
� y;:
i,v
Shelly SAND ! � °, Silty GRAVEL
�'
Granular Materials Silts and Clays
Safety Hammer Automatic Safety Hammer Automatic
Relative Density SPT N-Value Hammer SPT Consistency SPT N-Value Hammer SPT
(Blow/Foot) N-Value (Blow/Foot) N-Value
(Blow/Foot) (Blow/Foot)
Very Loose Less than 4 Less than 3 Very Soft Less than 2 Less than 1
Loose 4-10 3-8 Soft 2-4 1 -3
Medium Dense 10-30 8-24 Firm 4-8 3-6
Dense 30-50 24-40 Stiff 8- 15 6- 12
Very Dense Greater than 50 Greater than 40 Very Stiff 15-30 12-24
Hard Greater than 30 Greater than 24
Strata Changes -ir,tne coiumr,"Soil Descriptions"on the drili log the horizontal lines represent strata changes. A solid
line(—)represents an estimated observed change.
GPOU11d W8t@t' -Observations were made at the times indicated. Porosity of soil strata,weather conditions, site
topography, etc. may cause changes in the water levels indicated on the logs.
EST L� �N�.
S O I L L E G E N D GEOTECHNICAL&MATERIALS
ENGINEERING,lEST1NG&INSPECTION
j
._-_______. ...
,_ _.._ .-..-. .
....-'_-_'—_-_.__--_— ____._ .. . .
_ . .._ _: . . . _:..._ . O"1-Ky�
-�---------� -----�-��-----�-��-�----�-- - � .. .
... --r .. _--------- -- .. . . - . . - . R�F�,
- - -- - , __ - -- � --_ , . . r _ CATALINA DR�i�E� �� s �azT� F�..:».,
. �---�-- \
. � .-.�r .�� ,\�' ys / y,,.. .IA� �� � _ � � � .: �, � - SEGTION 2q.TOWNSHIP�29�SOUTH.RANGE IS EAST
-� � � .ne.r.. �s3`,. ; ' .r� `��y . -���-��--- . . ,. _ . . ..ae � . PMELLAS COUNTY.FLDRIDA
� yf �.J. �� • � �� "�,°,'o,���".'��m,4�..�
� �9� � � ��-r5.88; SE'44' E� `�- I � . . ,,..• rs� . g��p. . w::� .
� € .° ,��� I % � I . . . � f . . . m..,, . �'� ��°� �..... „a.. . � - I- �.� . - y -
� � �1,� 1 ' T•..I -T_'ip.,,_�.r.W.�_._,.....—� ,�!�-..�`�-_�� l� . - - .r . . II �....I;. —-? „+�e- .._... - — �— y «S� ts�.w°r^ i . � .
� � ti � � I�£ � i � _ . . � - ��'f . : . ' � - .
_- � 1 ,� i l - � � I�_J - � R�e�o I _ r » 3d � �r
��` /
� � �iti', I,� - � � � � _ I � " �� •�•
� �j�,,; ; : j r`= � .,... I � _ ' � �...,�,
r�' {s � , _ I I �: � I
� � �S}: �� }'i r 0 �r „a., �.. ��., ..,. � � �t _ � .��• i ����°w°��....�...
. 1�' �E�T r
l `
I '�
,i, �� . .�..
�'I . i ,
I
I
;� ��� I I I .. I' � .,.a.
�.'� ' ( oI "�_:_ -- � � I Id -- - _ � I' i �, I. ....,
� �,. _ � � � . .�
y �,� � 1 � I� I I � � ' �
_ s;i�r� •e 1" � o ' 3
',t�1'I S � I . a —J � . � �f � p , r I, r
- ; �ii,�1�1'i..� '�y,___' __ � 1 ,.' Q I[S4 °�:'`-=�°�""".' . � �' � i 2 i I I! I� � _ . . .6.�.a`°�.._ .o.,� o-,,.....a,.e,a -
� :
�1 � , � , ' d
. �� � : -- " � i� ' � ': . � - � - . �i _ � . . . ro��. .
_ � � - . � m.,nm.. n:..,.�.a�,w a.a.
0
� t : . o
_ It1t�'� ° " ; : � ' ;• '� I�I: . _ � .�� �. :_I is „ \� a
.
� '
, . � � Y , _ _e` _ I I I � '. ; i �` , ;.
.
,.
� ,:
;
;
- � �';'�i.t U i 3 �7 . . '. . I i u y � - . .
„ I
�YI � � I ' _�.aR. �e. 6.RO�.,.Pr. �ry I � '' � ..J- +' - �{-. ,,� °'
� _ •--•• -
.
. � �, i' �.; _ �e ! i �. �-�'- _m F T - i �I " - � � ° I r�, i .r
. ...
...•-
' , U �` �z h o �
. _ . j� � r�4 e.. . _ a� : �t >. 'P _ . ' . i 'r I� 9 - I '� � _ r ._ . � __.___.._-__.-__ -' _.___. ___... _ .. �....... ... .
� i . , •
��
'
� ���t�i?;; ?I z,. c s , �. . '3 a o I ;; •• � ��a� oj' $ - F�, - � � � �
.e .
� £
� - . �` . ) ..... . .� ; .. - o ; _. _ `.�^ � . ; 6 _ _ _ --- � .� � i i . .
I : '^� I
, « : „
. •i���'�I j -- • ..� _- .:. . _ . . . t U a '
V y
� �
__ ` '. '- � . . 1.
. .� -_-_. ... .� i . . + �� .
� ♦
_- -_". : �i� i . ., �_ y
I I . '�' .�; �
e I
.._ �_ � I 1� ii.� ' . ..a . � ,' . �. � t . . � aa .a�.�� �.�.� . � I I� �I II V l� � �VJ� ..�� � � .
� � -°___�°__ __ �____ ___ ._� � � I Oo a:.. ...�.,
',� � :..o.
�� � ry f Pi� � _-�. „ , , �,... I , � �; .
� y� 'Ir ; I�� • I '°' { I ' '. .��. { . •r r � r. �� I - � � a � .., a. ... �.s � .�...,o. . .�e...m
� v� �i � i��I�� sy � ��r I _ — T i' II. I'� --- ':�. ��...�
� ��iii;�;� i V ' . MO �� I ' ' �r ' •�d�•,�.�uu:�. o..�. . ,yxs t ' wi� ��3 3 I i• I� , j e . . '�.�, _ . awat.�,�„a,,•,,.a e,.oe,m.m .wim.a.zsm
tl �� .I�� � � �i I
li.;',li�l' '�,,: � t� � � -`°'=� _ ,�s a e,
i7'i�,��'�� Ir 1..�...... _ I•, - ^� . i� g I -� -- -- rw I 1�I , �,�,m. ...o......�.. ,�
.� ��;u j� ��«a:c+3-e,,._9 yr� . � °_____ 'xF..�- . . a� I I 3'�j1 - .. .�
�� i.�� i�, �ti .�7�.=L-_ �, rv�' I _ I _ . _ , � : _ �.-e.s ,. - I �50 (.i�c� i .mr � ..
�. � �1 I �`�� __'___ _ -..,. ���' ` ��� . ' .ee� E � _ _ _ „ 3. _ 0 .c . °`w' .
JIi �� --- :" W i, j s.; _ �.=,,s; � w�,.,�m�.�
�4 +I P�� ��_�_� \� . .[ iL�- — — — i
� ��;�-� j �. �s: I = � � z _, , ��::: v a ,
� �� � — —°_ � .I � .��' i ' � — �' ..a. �� .,, ia,
,
,
— � , Y� I � � ..�. , ..r � ,, _ - - __— � i H '- .. w
� ,�1 i� t �°,I . �'' _ ��s. _ .s.< ' I o 3� ____— -- �w,... �.i `; } � � - i . - . ����,. ::�.,x.enev..�i ..a...+�a-�a�.w .�....�:�...�.R
+ Y� ��lr�� '� :I � � -- --- — I �It � ` '� ,��...�u..,�,.,.� �..w "".,e.:.:.. .:°��
�-hj Wc ���UrA�,r'1' I NI S, �' ` Q, . � n � o ���`''�`���b�m..
5 ' _ �1. . • '°m.<.wo.=.r'�i.o+ :""° � "."""'°'°
� W t � ;� � o � � - - - �I �n i I °�`c �«,��...�.�.,a ' ........:...,w�;`w��
d � ;,� � ^� I, I,_ � � ;' , ..�...�,..�a .��.a��..,.. m ...�
Q': Q , '• 1 0 ��r . r.. � _. �.e--s' iJ / - ♦ I. I• ;` i- . , .�.� .s��.� �..a'°n.....ro»:a:
m U� r'' . � p F . �._..,� I �I � i ..I t ��,��r . .mc..+.exn ';.w•.a �.�.'�`r�..��.. ""
� �
� � � n _ _
W m...
' {�1� � _
- - y �
- ��
,� Y �� „ � ; � I
� - _
„ , � , . �
� o , � _ _ �
a , . , ,_ . v. . �
' • � � � ��'�1ii Y `i L f � "-_'���� I U I � ��.vu .. -_ \• ^I 6 � �� . p I I�� =f � . 5.e-s1�
� � � .... . � .... ... � .
. . p ' ` • s ':' i ; a ' _ _'t. 3I � 1. �.I. e ..�i .V ,—_ ' .._- m .
o � i � I .� . f - _ - - - � . .. �. .
__ „ .
�
. •
< e ';°li � _ y. : _ '°°'� � �
il,...,,., ' � , z , � .
< O y u;� � '�I .1 i : .. � � I.�. ,, _ . _�J : 1- l r . i-� .�...m e., , .,,.°j.,�.a a.aio...we.�
, �' , .
� ��,��n;� � , - _ � � �
> ' -- _ � . .. ... . .
, ° ��;�'r,;Il��;l'�' � 1 g : ' = � _ _ __ - j 0 �w��,
, � i I
' ' , ", i , - -;
�� ��� � .a. �� :.� _ ,�� :o.a.�..�
...
... Z . � „ . , .
_. � ��;it��;i �I�� � . ; 'i _ . t ..._L. � �� � �reaY r . 'S t'J p i, '�.: �.�:a
.. .. .
. �.{�����+11 �� •I S �� o !. 7 . ' ' " . .
"
_ ��� .� -. .. e �..� �/. .e��, �..:oew � I � .��.R`:"
i � f � �' � r
i �P1uh � .'I ' � f ' - %. G I #_ a _ °J_ i 0 I v�
8 il�'±'I���,; . .�.\�' '� S �Q '/ i Ir 'J�' 4 i��L � : . . ' .o..... S � � � 1 � '�., � �� a.�� '°°;�.`°[�.a..e..a�b,..�.n�,.�.��. .
1 �I IP;I�,i ;�'� `� '� a � a `��`"zc.'^'S° _ , . _ I o ; I � � , r�sm w�'� ,b..a.�, �..e.�e
E � � i'y+';�" � I��•` : , 1 � � I.! _J ' •'� I _I., ' i: ; d� �o I i �' .....�.�' _ .. ............. .�.R,�e�,..._...
_ .P. ,, ,', �`� � uF I� - ��.n a.f.......-_ . . � � I` �. . , . ma.w.wo.. e.w..e�.« r eos.���u�..�r
I= ; >, �� o .`t 1 � � �l :, �: � " !; ' .�.
�;' z I,1'` :'' �".� 'i Y I�� M. '' il� :' I- I I' I i �.M.,.,...d..a'°°"�...,.��.�. �. � .tl u.. �
f � 1 � ts.`'� ,\ � '� I� {�' � - �„o�., --Ree� ..r , I I�I � i � ��d „�...�..o„ 'ee ._....
� �+y �'r
f `,„� + , s' �• 'Y 1 .I � � � � ��..�
� �, ' I t I; � -, Y I +� � • I � � v/•�»
�?�i'\ �\I�4- ° � ' o .s,• � l t � � r '
t e �� : � '" q.� - i
: .
�o �o oa I„�, � , � - � _ ,,.., -- — „ ..,�., t �' .,. - ' �n.m,�., ro.:;�:a ,�:��.
� ".�� ;��I � _.. � .� . r � � _ �
�� - -- -_ - -l• ., -- __ � • ��;5 ` �~ / ��
_ __ ,g�.�"o:�°�
,; ,� 7 ., :T u , � . - � `;� -�__ :� ± , .,�..�°�,
�, t � I �� �G ' ,i �C;�- � I � ^ 3 � �. . L;.=-^:c'_ � , ,�..�...,.o.n..�.sµ��,...
K .. � . .�.�.e.s
,� -
i ��"'- ��'. - .. - ". . . __ �' -- -_ "' '� i IMPERIAI GARDENS
d o ^
'� °i=
il. . - " '' . . _ . . . . . . �� .� - ' - .
_ . � ' . ..�. . .:-. ; . f _ � . � w�
. �.��
. _ ' __ _ __ - .., �... �.� .� 'r•° � �, '� - __ _ . �-f� vu•m.� uw w`vc"�amum � MMHV W.WsRIOW UIC.
� . ___ _ - ___ _ �. ��.,. '_' __ t_ R .. ..°6�en:.v++�cus�.�m �� ns
_� ..-,:.. N URSERY � ROAD cAP�e�S�T�:�Nw; .e.. �.� ,, ', . ' . I �.��.� ,,.. � _..,. .,,,.
. _
i �"vo' cu+.w+c*e7 � �5{�pcn�b� -- _ ' _ _ - - -- - -----.._ _- :-----�- '- ---- - ---- -- - - -- -
_ ----�-- _ _
_ _ ___. - _ -----
_ -- _
-- ------ _ _-_ ____. - -