The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2012-08015; 300 VENETIAN DR CDB Meeting Date: November 20, 2012 Case Number: FLD2012-OSO15 Agenda Item: D. 1. Owner/Applicant: Nick Szirmai, Venetian Shores Condo Assoc. President Representative: Lisa Ryan; Advanced Marine Construction Address: 300 Venetian Drive � CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND D�VELOPM�NT DEPARTMENT S'1'Al+'1� KE!'OK'1' � � +�ar�at�r _ �.f.�..�., - U i - t- t�. rx�� .;�:,.,; � • .g• `'� � �; � , � t `� • . � �`� � � • t � . tt. . � �, � ,_ ; �� pr �•�� ti �L. � �' Y " � 'i • �iv �: .� �� '+,t ?�� R � � , �r ;� � ,.- .� .. '. � - � � 3 � • ti ,,�� - - . �` '��• . U: '^�� "-'...' � �� .- ' �`� � ��--� � r�` �� . .. . � ,. :� � �,,i` '�� , �;�;�,,� �;, , .,, t ,a- � , `, , �..�-� +� � �� . ° � -:� , .. , .,� � v� � i �.< .�„ :' ` �, y '� �E� '� � ta" Y � +► �': � � . . , � I� :�� y. . � �, � f ,/y ��y "MiY: �*/�yrr .1 '1 � � � -, 9"►p�w � � �1.. . � �.�� '�� 't 4�f�•. e - .. � . o . � �N� � .r� �x� � . ! � ' - "' � , `+�" '" .:� �`"°�, . �• . .._._.T. ,,,� . . i � D *�r �` � 8�rre . '- . � '� f, � ' 1 I� , �{,, �' ,S��'.., '' x. � �. ..� ;;,�. ,p; � � ., i�.i. � .'i� • � �i , 4j.. v ' �� 4 ', ;"i �:,� S�_�� y � i► _ �° _ � � :� s! � �� Contents GFNERALINFORMATION:......................................................................................... 1 ANALYSIS:.......................................................................................................................2 Site Location ancf Existin�Conditions:.......................................................................2 DevelopmentPro�osal: .................................................................................................3 SpeeialArea Plan: .........................................................................................................4 Dcvelopment Parameters..............................................................................................4 ComprehensivePlan:.....................................................................................................6 CommunityDcvelopmcnt Code:..................................................................................6 CodeEnforcement Analysis: ........................................................................................7 COMPLIANCE WITN STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:...........................................$ COMPLIANCE W['fH GF NF.RAI. APPLICABILITY STANDARDS: ....................8 COMPGIANCE Wt'CN GF;NERAL CRtTERIA FOR COMMERCIAL DOCKS....t3 COMPLIANCF WiTtl D[MENSIONAL STANDARDS:............................................9 COMPLIANCE WITH DEVIATION STANUARDS................................................. 10 SUMMARY AND�2ECOMMENDA"fION:................................................................. 12 ' l��ec�rwaler Level II Flexible Devel ment IicaUon Review-DRAFT PLANNI4G&UEYELOPtv1tVT � � �p DEVF,IAPNENT RF.VILW DIYISION . . . . . . � . . . xs�. .. GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: I�lexible Development application to permit a 96 square foot addition to an existing 852 square foot Multi-Use Dock as accessory to an existing attached dwelling with a decrease in the side (west) setback from 32 fcet (une-third ol'the width of the pruperly) to 10 feet to an extension of an existing catwalk and 12 feet to a proposed boatlift associated with slip seven and approximately 26 feet to a proposed boatlift associated with slip six, a decrease in the side (east) setback from 9.5 feet {one-tenth �f the width of the pr�perty) to five feet t� a proposed davit and an increase in the rnaximum width of a dock from 71.25 feet (75 percent of the width of the property) to 75 feet (78.9 percent of the width of the property), under the provisions of Community Development Code(CDC) Section 3-601.C.3. ZONING: Medium Density Residential(MDR) District FUTURE LAND USE ' , PLAN CATF.GORY: Rcsidcnti�l Urban (RlJ) PROPF.RTY USE: C'urrent: Attached dwellings (nine units) and an 852 square loot I i1CCCSSUIy C�UCIC Proposed: Attached dwellings (nine units) (no change) and 96 square feet af new dock resulting in a total of 948 square feet EXISTING North: Preservation(P) District Intercoastul Wa�erwuy SURROUNDING South: Low Medium Density Detached Dwellings ZONING AND USES: Residential (LMDR) District East: Medium Density Residential Altached Dwellings (MDR)District West. I,ow Medium Density Detached IhveJlin�s Residential (LMDR)District �M� . I . � �. 1...� 1 , 1•..1�w.� . . f .__'�� . �. ' , ., �i� 1��i ,^`^ ;:. . `. � __L� � � -, � , .,. ,,�T S'r , . { � « , �r� � I �� ,� � i. I� , t,�i i �� , �� ° ��F �,� � _�A�� -1—�—� _' , �•... + ,u i. �,.:` � G ! u�. • __.J _. � �...1 � � � ZONING MAP . '" � """I =' - � � Community Develapment Board—November 20, 2012 FLD2012-08015 Pa�e 1 �f 14 � 4�Irt�l►�fsl�.l Level II Flmclbk Dev�elopment AppGqtion Review—DRAFT P��NG1 DEVELOPP�NT DEVELOPI�NT REVIEW DIVISION ANALYSIS: Site Location and Eaisting Conditions: The 0.498 acre site is a waterfront lot located on the north side of Venetian Drive at the northeast corner of Venetian Drive and Venedan Point Drive/Sunset Drive. The subject property is zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) District. The inteiit and purpose of the MDR is to protect and preserve the integrity and value of existing, stable residential neighborhoods of inedium density while at the same time, allowing a cazeful and deliberate redevelopment and revitalization of existing neighborhoods in need of revitalization or neighborhoods with unique amenities which create unique opportunities to increase property values and the overall attractiveness of the City. The subject property is comprised of nne parcel with a frontage of appmximately 95 feet atong Venetian Drive and 95 feet of frontage along a small man-made bay which leads directly int� Clearwater Harhar. A nine-unit �ttached dwelling, built in 1959, is centrally located on the site. An 852 square foot dock is located along the north side of the site extending 41 feet into the bay. '1'he 75 foot wide dock consists of a main dock structure with four catwalks providing eig,ht slips. The dock also includes a single boattift attached to slip five centrally located within the dock structure. The existing dock is 10 feet from the side (east and west)property lines. The irnmediate vicinity is characterized by a mix of attached and detached dwetlings with a va�riety of aecessory uses ineiuding, pools, decks, patios and docks. The prevalent uses in the area are, however, detached dwellings. Several overnight accommodation uses exist farther to the east along North Fort Hamson Avenue. A few of these properties are waterfront with frontage along the same bay as the subject property. An informal analysis of the location of docks vis-a-vis side property lines for properties along V�iietiaii Drive a�id Venetian Puint Drive/Sunset Drive was conducted utilizing aerial photographs via Googte Maps and the City of Ciearwater's GIS rnapping services. The analysis resulted in the identification of nine properties with accessory docks and/or boatlifts which appear to be within 10 feet of their respective extended side property lines. It must be ernphasized that this was an informal study and precise measurements are not possibte without the submission of scaled surveys for each property. In addition, with one exception (an overnight aecommodations use) all such noted docks are associated with detached dwellings. The analysis does appear to indicate a pattern of development in the neighborhood which includes docks and boatlifts with side setbacks similar to the proposal. The properties in question are marked with stars and include extended side property lines(in yellow)on the following aerial photograph. Community Development Board-November 20,2012 FLD2012-0801 S-Page 2 of 14 Clea�Wt�t�r Level II Flexible Oeve ment A lication Review-DRAFf P��NC�aeve�opn�vr _� �;, � � DFVF.I.OPMENT Rf,VIEW DIVISION . ✓a..�.i rr�i• ... ..,.. k�,...x.�.. .;; � ,.1 ._�,.,, ,_ ._ , . ...... .. . ,.,,.�,�..:. �rn � ��i� .� •1 :� f ,'. �� r`..� � _. �`N'�� ,. .. . t� , - �,�-r �-� . �� ,�;�."'�, � _ � --: . �� [y � �� ,•� t'� �� r� .r 1� � ,,, .'?�F'��,-> . r, �,' � :a i �, f'.. r � i. ��" ��`,��,, �� ,x ',,. � ;�'' ,�';�. � E �t�,, � 'f ' �,,,•.a-- ,,,�. .� � �,��''"'"''�,,� "j�"' -,�y��'!�;�• +N�� ►. �' .� '�' ��' � � ,� ,�" .� � � N� ,k � �� ... 1 'r �� r " � . . � A' � i! :I � � s!S �~ +I� i. .. $ �a 1�. � . �. . �:�� fi + . Jy� �� ` �' ,h . ,�,,*�.. s�►�,, .�,� �!M��. #��r�r'� �� ');F r `, � .., � �,`_ (�.�y�.��.•4.. � 1 r� � �. .�� `�� !� � A[ f. < :� �.. �r�� 4 ^t< J;,' . , , �, /� :��'�t-�" �:w �; ': �� 1 .�� , : .._ ,�. � , ` r"�� r?'�yi�*w. 14 �� 4 �"' 74 � :�. - ��'�=%- `� �." , „ � ,��E .. t ��► ��,7 ;,�� —�-�''�i�r,� ;°ti`r Mr,�..��.—...--v�� rT�, y Y'(? . 'i !1w � .� ' ~ .,:�4 ,,.; ' 'i': , .�.. �E! y,; �� ,r�`". ,N! .rr .�", �, � �,�1. � f: � � ,>'.� t�� .� _ 91•� 1 �� p , �� i ��•�, Y� -� v '. ��, Y�� ' ..j,• .�� ` �• t�� .~ '�Y��} �� `. `yi �d 1 •� �Y � _ �� r� � �� ` •;�,��i �r �; .� � . � 1� �?� � ��t �.y� �.. � ± � �,lS' ,y ." � r . � r ,S ;� � � 1 �''\� 'i#'.. � �' ".- ''�%�.�� '' � �]l��C "y�.. `Y � �,��' ;' ';�. , ,,y'• Y^•r� C� •.;� ' ' M t �� * � �t �j � `� � � t,� • � � "'-.c � �t� � � �y�f � /��.} _ , � � � ,�� "�'�'h^ , ' �'`a, ��'�. � .i ',� ''�� . �, :� �: .k�V�� ,,� �..7 • �-......�� 1"!; y,�y'`e;�J.�� .t ��i.� , r�w•�»� aF'.� � � � •�� i�� s`�li �eP�� ° �tNi ir4N�� r� » �� , w �<`�'j �� . ,r. j� �;,� h . t � .yC``:�Z! '".�d� ~ . � 31�r. 1 r 1 Uevelopment Proposal: The proposal is to extend all four existin� catwalks 12 feet to the north and install one davit on slip 1 on the easternmost catwalk and boatlifts on slips 6 and 7. The four catwalk extensions are 24 square feet each{two teet by 12 feet) and total 96 square feet. The westernmost catwalk will maintain the existing although nonconforming 14 foot setback. The boatlifts an slip 7 and 6 will be setback 14 feet and approximately 26 feet, respectively, from the extended side (west) property line. While the davit arms on slip 1 will be within five feet(when fully extended)of the extended side {east) property line the setback to the proposed easternmost catwalk extension will be maintained at the existing C�de-c�mrliant 1 Q feet. Tt should he �inted oi�t that the supporting structure of the proposed davits will be mounted to the easternmost catwalk. The existing dock is 41 feet in len�th and 75 teet in width and, as mentioned, 852 square teet. "I'he proposal will bring the total square footage of the dock to 948 square feet and increase the overall tength of the dock to 53 feet. While nonconforming, the width of the dock will not change with the propasal. The proposal is being reviewed as a Flexible Development application because the dock exceeds 500 square feet in area and does not meet the minimum side setbuck requirements or the maximum width limitation. Section 3-601 provides, in part, that a multi-use dock is any dack owned in comman or used by the residents of a multi-family developrnent and may be permitt�d as a I.evel I (minimurn standard) use provided such dack is less than SOU square feet in Community Development Board—November 20,2012 FLD2012-08015 Page 3 of I� ` V�`\.i LeVCI II fkxlblC IWtl011 R2YIEYV—DRAFT MANNU/GBDEVELOP[r1ENT �� DF VFLOPMENT RF.VtEW DIV ISION �: ,.. deck area. The Cade section further provides that multi-use docks which exceed 500 square feet in area shall be treated as a commercial dock. All commercial docks must be reviewed as Level II Flexible Development uses. Therefore, irrespective of the deviations with regard to side setback and dack width, the proposal would need to be reviewed by the Community Development Board as paR of a Level II Flexible Development application. In addition, Section 6-102 provides that nanconforming struch�res may not be altered, enlarged or changed in any way that increases its nonconformity. The extension of the westernmost catwalk and the proposed boatlift ►�vill be nonconforming with regard to setbacks. ln addition, extending the two outermost catwalks would be in conflict of CDC Article 6 Nonconformity Provisions in that a nonconforming structure may not be altered except to reduce its nonconformity. The two outer catwalks are a component of the dock which is directly related to its nonconforming width as based on the width of the property. Therefore, the two outer catwalks and the boatlifts/davits associated with slips 1, 6 and 7 are not permitted except as deviations frorn the provisions of Section 3-601. Note that the definition of "docks" per Article 8 of the Community Development includes boatlifts and othcr acccssory structures. It should also be noted that na other changes to the site or use are proposed and that only the proposcd dock is subject of this r+eview. It should also be painted out that the praposal c�oes iiot increase the total number of slips (eight) associated with the praperty thereby keeping the effective intensity of use the same as it is now. Finally, it should be noted that the proposed two inner catwalk extensions do not deviate from the dimensional standards of Section 3-601 however,they, too, would in and of themselves require a Level II Flexible Standazd Development review due to the fact that the dock exceeds 500 square feet in azea. Special Area Plan: None Development Parameters Densi Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-301.1, the maximum density for properties with a Future Lund Use Plan (FLUP) designntion of ResidentiAl Urban (RU) is 7.5 units per acre. The 0.498 acre property yields a permitted density of three dwelling units where nine exist. The site is, therefore, nonconforming with regard to density. While density has no bearing on the proposed dock extension Staff feels it is important to note that the existing use is considered an existing> legally permitted nonconformity. Based on aerial photographs and the submitted survey it appears that the site is also nonconforming with regard to front {south) side (wesl) ancl rear (north) setb�u;k�. Sh�uld lhi� builciing be damageci ur destroyed to an extent greater than 50 percent of the assessed value of the huilding it would not be permitted to be rebuilt as it currently exists. It is highly recornmended that a termination of status of nonconformity with regard, at least, to lot width, density and setbacks, be requested. Planning staff can provide additional information and advice�n this if requested. To reiterate,the density and existing site conditions exclusive of the dock are not the subject of this application and/or review and have no bearing on whether ar not the submittal may be approved, approved with conditions or denied. Community Development Board-November 20,2412 FI.D2012-Q8Q1 S-Page 4 of Id p�r��Vl LEY2�lI FIE7fIbIC DEV2ID(Nll�flt/1�ICd[IOfI RBVICW-DRAFT PLANNING B DEVELOPMENT u ... ,,,.._ . DF.VELOP�fF:MT Rf:YtEW DIYISION Impervious Surface Ratio jISR,� Pursuant to CDC Section 2-301.1,the maximum allowable ISR is 0.65. The overall existing ISR is approximately 0.52, which is c�nsistent with anPlicahle Code provisi�ns. N� changes are proposed which will change the ISR of the site. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-303,the required lot area and lot width aze to be a minimum of 10,000 squarc fcct and 100 fcct, respcctivcly. The lot arca is 21,693 squarc fcct and the lot width is 95 feet. While the lot area exceeds the otherwise minimum area required by Code the width daes nat. As mentioned above one way to address this shortcoming is to apply for a termination of status of noncanfartnity. However, lot width, widi regard tu the proposal, oniy icnpacts the required side setbacks, length and width of the dock. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-303, front, side and rear setbacks to the principal structure are 25 feet, five and 10 feet, respectively. According to the submitted survey the front(south), side(east and west)and rear (north}setbacks are 11 feet,zero feet(east and west)and 11 feet, respectively. As mentioned, while these setbacks as applicable to the existing building are not the subject of this application it is suggested that these nonconformities be addressed at some point to protect the owners of the pmperty. With regard to the dock, Section 3-bO1.C.3.h provides that the required side setbacks aze calculate�l Jifferently bx�ed un lhe lype uf adjacent use. In lhe evenl lhal. the sile conlaining the commerciaUmulti-use dock is adjacent to a site occupied by a detached dwelling and that use is consistent with the zoning district the side setback shall be one-third the width of the property as measured along the water. A second provision provides direction for calculating the side setback if the dock is located on non-residentially zoned property. That provision is not applicable in this case because the subject site is within the MDR district. The final provision relating to side setbacks for commeroial/multi-use docks provides that otherwise the side setback shall be 10 percent of the property width. As noted, the subject site is residentially zoned and is bordered by a property on the west within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district and occupied by a detached dwelling and is bordered on the east by attached dwellings located on property within the MDR district. Therefore, given the property width of 95 feet the side (west) setback is 31.5 feet (one-third of the properiy width) and the side (east) setback is 9.5 feet (10 percent of the praperty width). The existing dack has a side (west) setback of 10 feet (nonconforming) and a side (east) setbuck of 10 feet (conforming). The propostil includes an extension of all four catwalks and the provision of a set of davits on the eastern-most catwatk on slip 1 resulting in the continuation of the existing 10 foot side(east)setback and the reduction of the side (east) setback to five fect(to the davits when fully cxtended) neither of which meets the requirements of Code. The proposal also includes boat lifts on slips 6 and 7 with side (west) setbacks of 14 and 26 feet, respectively, which would also violate the required 31.5 foot side setback. , Community Development Board—November 2Q,2012 FLD2012-08015—Page 5 of l4 : ��Le1/!�II FllXIWC A ICa�I0f1 RCV�CW—OR/�fT PLANNING Ac DEVEI.OPMENT �P�� PI� UEYELUP.MENT REV[EW DIVI514N � �^„��+fi�` ... Mecha»ical E�uinment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. Mechanical equipment is not proposed with the application. Sight Visibilitv Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.B, to enhance views of the water from waterfront property, no structure or landscaping may be installed,other than a fence around a swimming pool or any non- opaque fences not exceeding 48 inches, within 20-foot sight visibility triangles located at each rear corner of the lot. No objects are proposed within any required sight visibility triangle. Comprehensive Ylan: The propasal is supported by applicable various Goals, Objectives and/or Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan as follows: Future Land Use Plan Element Ubje.c.tive. A.S._S - Promote high quality design standards that s:ipport Clearwaler's image arrd contribute to its identity. The proposal includes extensions to four existing catwalks and the addition of two boatlifts and a set of davits to an existing dock which serves as an accessory use ta an existing attached dwelling use. The proposal will rnaintain the existing 10 foot side (west) setback and reduce the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet where the Code requires side setbacks of 31.5 and 9.5 feet, respectively. While not meeting the requirements of Code the proposal is consistent with the placement of other docks in the irnmediate area although it should be noted that most of these docks serve detached dwellings. The proposal would enhance an existing waterfront use and is sup�rted by this Objective. Policy A.S.S.1 Development should be designed to maintain and support the existing or e.nvisione.�'charac.ter of the neighborhood As mentianed above, the proposal is consistent with other docks in the area with regard to side setback and is consistent with this Policy. Cornmunity Development Code: The proposal is supported by the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code as fopows: Sectlon 1-103.B.1. Allow�ng property owners to errhance the value of their properry through innovative and creative redevelapment. The subject site is located within a four-lot(MDR district enclave within a larger LMDR district area. The size, location and shape of the parcel are similar to other parcels in the associated MDR district. The proposed dock extensions, set of davits and boatlifts are similar to other docks and boatlifts in the area with regard to side setbacks. The proposal will decrease the arnount of disturbed silt by providing the opportunity for boat owners to pull into their slips bow- first thereby keepins propellers in deeper water. Currently, the catwalks do not extend the full length of the docked boats. Extending the existing catwalks will allow for safer boarding and de- Communiry Development Board-November 20,2012 FLD2012-08015—Page 6 of 14 �\ri��lbl Level II fle�cible Dev ment lication Review—DRAFT PLANNING�DEVEI.OPAiENI' � � UEYELqP�1EVT REVtEW piVIS[()N b .. -.a��s�� - . .. . boarding of boats providing an enhancement of the property. Therefore this Code section is applicable to and in support of this proposal. Section 1-103.B.2. Ensuring that development and redevelopment will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties arrd wherever practicable promoting development and redevelopment which will enhance the value of surrounding praperties. Surrounding properties are a mix of attached and detached dwellings with a variety of accessory structures typical of waterfront detached dwellings such as pools, patios, decks and docks. The proposed dock extensions and boatlifts/davits will result in a property developed similarly to surrounding properties. The proposal will not increase the number of existing slips(eight). The proposal is consistent with the established character of the neighborhood aiid ineets this Cod� section. Section 1-103.8.3. Strengthening the city's economy and increasing its tax base as a whole. The proposal includes the enhancement of an existing attached dwelling with nine dwelling units with dock extensions totaling 96 square feet, a new set of davits (associated with slip 1) and two boattifts (associated with slips 6 and 7). The proposal will be consistent with the character of the azea with regard to the proposed side setbacks of the dock extension and boatlift and would enhance the value of the existing development. Therefore the proposal meets this Code sectiort. Section 1-103.D. It is the further purpase of this Development Code to make the beautification of the ciry a matter of the highest prioriry and to require that existing and future uses and structures in the city are attractive and well-maintained tn�the. maximurra exte.nt pe.rmitte.nl hy law. The proposal includes professionally installed extensions to an existing dock, a set of davits and two new boatlifts. The proposai will have limited aesthetic impact, positive or negative. Therefore this Code section is not strictly applicable to this proposal. Code Enforcement Aaalysis: There aze no active Cade Compliance eases for the subject property. Communiry Devetopment Board-November 20,2012 FLD2012-0801 S-Page 7 of 14 : VibAd nAl\.l Levei II Fle�dble tw,,.,1icatlon Review-DRAFT �LANNING k D6VELOPMENT � ��Mf^ DEVELOPMETIT REVIEW D[VIS�ON u�� ........_ �e �a�,�,FC� ��- .. . . COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the developrnent proposAl with the applicable standards for accessory uses/structures as per CDC Tables 2-201.1 and 2-202: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconaistent Minimum SetbACks Addressed in the Compliance wTth Dimerrsional Standards N/A section of this document. Maximum Hcight I S fcct 0 fcct X COMYLIANG�; Wl'1'H(��;N1:1ZAL AYYLICAl31L1TY STANDA1tDS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standazds for Level One Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Cod�istent Inconsistent 1_ The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, Dulk, X coveragq dcnsity and character ofadjacent prope�ties in which it is located. 2_ The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or signi�cantiy impair the value thercof. 3. The proposcd dcvelopment will not adversely affect the hcalth or safcty of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is dcsigncd to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Thc proposcd dcvclopmcnt is consistcnt with thc community charactcr of thc X immediate vicinity. b_ The design of the proposed devetopment minimizes adverse effects, including X visual,acoustic and olfacto and hours of o ration im acu on ad'acent ro nies. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL DOCKS (SECTION 3-601.C.3.a-g): The development proposal has been found to be consistent with the criteria for commercial docks. Specific responses ta each of these criteria have been pmvided by the applicant and are included with their application. The individual criteria for commercial docks (and mutti-use docks which shatl be reviewed as commercial docks based on square footage)are set forth in the following table: Consistenl leconsistenl 1. The proposed dock shall be subordinate to and contribute to the comfort, X canvenience or necessitics of the uscrs ar the occupants of the principal use of the property. 2. The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent X properties and the neighborhaod in general. 3. The proposed dock shall be compatible with dock pattems in the general vicinity. X 4. Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities. 7�e use of the proposed dock X shall not adversely impact the health,safety or well being of persons cwrently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercisl uses. Furthermore, it shall not hinder or discourage 1he existing uses of the adjacent watcrway by uses including but not limited to non-motoriud boats and motorizcd boats. Conununity D�cvelopment Board-Nov�mber 20,2012 FLD2012-0801 S-Page 8 of 14 ` C��ai nRl�LeWd II Plexible Develo M Review—DRAFT n.nrm�no a DevE�o�Mexr Pme ADPN�� DEVBLOPt�N'TREVIEWDIVIS[ON u ��mro�w� Conautent lnconaistent 5. Impacts on Navigation. The existence and use of the proposed dock shall not have a X detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigatfon, trensportation, recreational or other public conveaiences. 6. Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid injury to marine X gracsbeds or other�quatic rosourcec in the surcounding azcas. 7. Docks shall not have an adverse imp�t upon natural marine habitats, grass flats X suitable as nursc[y feeding grounds for marine life, or established matine soil suitable for producing plant growth of a type useful as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life;menatee sanMuaties;natural reefs and any such aRificial reef which has developed an associated tlora and fauna which have been determined to be approaching a typical natural assamblage stnecture in both density and diversity; oyster beds;clam beds;known sea mrtle nesting site;commercial or sport fisheries or shell tisheries areas;and habitats desirable as juvenile tish habitat. R. All lurning basin,access channels,boat mooring areas and any other erea associated X with a dock shall have adequate circulation and existing water depths to ensure that a minimum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the water body at mean or ordinary low water(-0.95 NCV D datum). 9. The dock shall not effectively cause erosion,extraardinary storm drainage, shoaling X of channels, or adversely afl'ect the water quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to be located. 10. The dock shali not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of X wildlife,marine life,and other natural resources,including beaches and shores,so as to be contrary to the public interest. 1 L The dock shall not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas;vegetative,terrestrial, X or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species providing one or mor�of the requirements to sustain their existence, such as range, nesting or feeding grounds;habitats which display biological or physical attributes which would serve to make them rare within the confines of the Ciry; designated preservation arcas such as those identified in the comprehensive Iand use plan, national wildlife refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated prescrvation areas, and bitd sanctuaries. 12. Impacts on Wctlands Habitat/Uplands. Thc dock shall not havc a matcrial advcrsc X affect u on the u lands surroundin . COMPLIANCE WITH DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS: The dimensional standards criteria set forth in CDC Section 3-601.C.3.h state that commercial and multi-use docks, when adjacent ta waterfront property used as a detached dwelling shall be located no closer to any property line as extended into the water than the distance equivalent to one-third of the width of the waterfront property line. Othervvise the required side setback shall be 10 percent of the width of the waterfront property line. The property adjacent to the �vest is used as a detached dwelling. The property on the east is used as attached dweliings. Therefore, the side (west) setback must be one-third the width of the property�nd the side (east) setback at least 10 percent of the width of the property. The width of the waterfront property line on the subject property is 95 feet; therefare the proposed dock must be set back from the west property line 31.5 feet and 9.5 feet from the east property line. As proposed, the two outer dock extensions will be sct back fram the west and east property lines a distancc of 10 fcct. Thc boatlift proposed for slip 7 will be 14 feet from the west praperty line and the boatlift proposed for slip 6 will be approximately 26 feet from the west property line. The proposed davits Community Development Board—November 20.2012 FLD2012•08Q 1 S—Page 9 of 14 ' lalVA�l RAl�bl Level II Fkndble Deve M li�tion Review—DRAFT PLANNIKG�DEVE(APMENT � APP UEVELOPMENT REYIEW UtV]SION � u .. ..^�,�.,�.a.<M , . � � associated with slip 1 on the east side of the site will be approximately five feet from the side (east)property line when fully extended. W ith regard to length, commercial docks shall not extend from the mean high water line or seawall of the subject property more than 75 percent of the width of the subject property as measured along the waterfront property line; thus the length of the dock is limited to 71.25 feet. As proposed, the dock has a length of 53 feet and meets the requirements of Code. The same threshold that applies to length also applies to width; therefore the width of the proposed dock should not exceed 71.25 feet. The total existing width of the dock, which is not proposed to change,is 75 feet or five percent greater thar►provided for by Code. The applicunt is requesting u five percent v�riution from the mfucimum width of the dock from 71.25 feet to 75 feet and reduction in the side(wcst)setback from 31.5 feet to 10 feet(to existing catwalk and proposed catwalk extension), 14 feet to a boatlift associated with slip 7 and 26 feet to a boatlift associated with slip 7 and a reduction in the side (east) setback from 9.5 feet to five feet to a set of davits when fully extended. The following table depicts ihe development proposals consistency with the standards and criteria as per CDC Section 3-bO1.C.3.h: Standard Proposed Coesiatent Inconsistent Doek Setbacks 33.3%of the width of the subject West: 10 feet(to dock), 14 X� (Miaimum) property(31.51'eetr feet to boatlift(slip 7) and 26 feet to boatiift (slip 6) 10%of lhe width of the subject East: 10 feet(to dock;S feet X� properiy(9.5 feet) (to daviu when fuily extended) Dock L,ength 75%of the width of the subject 53 feet X (Ms:imum) ptape.rty(7125 fect) Doek Width 75%of the width of the subject 75 feet X� Maximum ro 71.25 feet � See axalysts tn S�a,$Report COMPLIANCE WITH DEVIATION STANDARDS Sectlon 3-601.C.3.i.i-vi: The dimensional standards criteria set forth in CDC Section 3-601.C.3.h may be varied should all the criteria, per Section 3-601.C.3i —vi, listed in the table below be met. These cciteria must be met in addition to the General Applicability Criteria listed in Section 3-914.A. Specific responses to each af these criteria have been provided by the applicant and are included with their application. As mentioned previously, the proposed length of the dock will be 53 feet where 71.25 feet is permitted. In addition the general location of the dock will remain the same. Therefore, the first two criteria are not strictly applicable to the proposal. Community Development Board-November 20,2012 F LD2012-0801 S-Page 10 of I4 6 ViL�tl 11'at�.i Level II Rexiblen�.,d,,,.,.,�nt tlon Review-ORAFf p��NMG Qc DEVELOPLI�N'f �+�•��F^�F AP� DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDtVIS10N . The applicant asserts that the primary reason for the catwalk extension to provide for a safer enviranment with regard to boarding and de-boarding boats by extending the catwalks to exisring tie-poles. This will also allow boat owners to pull into their slip baw-first keeping the propeller in deeper water reducing the amount of silt disturbed thereby maintaining clearer water in the bay. The applicant further asserts that the subject property is unique in that it is a waterfront attached dwelling use located within a small MDR district in a neighborhood largely within the LMDR district consisting of waterfiont detached dwellings. While the circumstances of the site as they relate to zoning provide a somewhat unusual juxtaposition of uses and zoning districts it is not unique and it is not clear how the literal enforcement of this Code Section would result in extreme hardship as the site has already been developed with attached dwellings and a dock. Therefore, it is unclear how the third criterion is satisfied by the request. Likewise, the fourth criterion is difficult to aff'irmatively apply to the site and proposal because, as mentioned, the site has been developed with attached dwellings and a dock. Requiring any extension and/or addition to the existing dock to meet the requirements of Code will nat dcprive the owner(s) of reasonable use of the property. Dacks serving attached dwellings are, by their nature, accessory. Accessory uses are defined as those uses which serve an existing conforming use wntribuling lu the cumfort, wnvenience ur us� of thal prineipal use. As such, il is difficult to envision a scenario where restricting or even prohibiting outright an accessory use would result in an"extreme"hardship or make the reasonable use of a property impossible. Criterian five provides that the requested deviati�n mu.ct he in harmc►ny with the general intent and purpose of the section and will not be detrimental to the public interest and welfare essentially requiring that the proposal will do no harm. A"general intent" is not provided in the Code far this section however, it may be reasonable to assume that the general intention of this section is to provide for the development of docks as accessory to permitted uses which do nat degrade the natural enviranment, prevent other pr4perty owners from reasonably using their properties and/or cause navigational conflicts. The proposal will not restrict any other waterfront property owner from accessing the water from their respective docks, installing and using a new dock for those properties currently without a dock, cause ar contribute to environmental dcgradation or hindcr in anyway nautical navigation. Thcrcforc, thc fiflth critcrion is mct with this proposal. The sixth and last criterion is not applicable as it address the issue of deviating from the length requirements of this section and the proposal is almost 20 feet less than the maximum length permitted. Consistent Incoasiahnt i. A dock of lesser length poses a threat to the marine environment, natural N/A resources,wetlands habitats or water quality. 2. The proposed dock location needs to be adjusted to minimize impacts rclating N/A to criteria set forth in Sections 3-601.C.3.b.—g. 3. A literal cnforccment of thc provisions of this section would result in cxtromc X� hazdship duc to the unique nature of thc project and the applicant's property. Community Development Board-November 20,2012 F1.D2012-08015-Psge 11 of t 4 ' 4ivRi nAt4i Level ll Flexible Development Application Review—DRAFT oFVe or�Giv�i�x�vr�n�rv¢rs►ox Consistent Incooaiatent 4. The deviation sought to be granted is the minimum deviation that will make X� possible the reasonable use of the applicant's property. However, wherc an applicant demonstrates riparian or littoral righk5 which will affect the location of the dock, the minimum further deviation to provide for exercise of such rights shail he aliowed. 5. The granting of the requested deviation will be in harmony with the general X inten[and purpose of this section and will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental or of adverse effect to the public interesl and welfare. 6. No dock shall be altowed to deviate f�om the length requirements specified in N/A Section 3-601.C.3.h. by more than an additional 50 percent of the allowable Irngth or to project into thc navigable portion of the waurway by more than 25 percent of such waterway, whichever length is less, except for those docks located on the east side of Clearwater Harbor adjacent to the mainland, which shell be allowed to devis►te up to a maximum length equnl to 25 percent of the navi able ortion of the waterwa . SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supparting materials at its meeting of October 4, 2012, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conctusions of law: Findings of Fact The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substnntiul competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. The 0.498 acre site is a waterfront lot located on the north side of Venetian Drive at the northeast corner of Venetian Drive and Venetian Paint Drive/Sunset Drive; 2. The subject property is located within the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and the Residential Urban(RU)Future Land Use Plan category; 3. The subjee;! pruperly is comprised of one parcel with approximately 95 feet of frontage along Venetian Drive and 95 feet of frontage along the water; 4. The subject property is not located in a special plan area; 5. The proposal is to increase the square footage of an existing 852 square foot multi-use dock hy 96 square feet t� a total of 94R �quare feet by extending four existing catwalks by 24 square feet each(two feet by 12 feet); 6. The proposal includes a side (east) setback of 10 feet (to dock) and five feet (to davit when fully extended}, a side (west) setback of 10 feet (to dock), 14 feet ta a boat lift associated with slip 7 and approximately 24 feet to a boat lift in association with slip 6; 7. The dock is and will continue to be accessory to an existing attached dwelling use; and 8. There�re no active Code Campliance cases for the subjeat property. Conclusions of Law Thc Planning and Dcvclopmcnt Dcpartmcnt, having madc the abnvc findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: Community Development Board—November 20,2012 FLD2012-08015—Page 12 of 14 � V��1�►i�lL� Level II Flexible Dev�e da�Review-DRAFT PLANN[NG�DEVFIOPMENi �1�APP�� pEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION ��«�.;; l. That the Deviations standards as per Section 3-601.C.3.i. i, ii and vi are not applicable to the proposal; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the fo(lowing: • The pattern of development of the surrounding neighborhood; • Applicable portions of the Comprehensive Plan including Future Land Use Plan Element Objective A.5.5 and Policy A_5.5.1; • The general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of the Community Development Code Sections 1-103.B.1 — 3 and D; • Applicablc Standards as per Tablc 2-303 of thc Community Development Code; • The General Standards for Level One and Two Approvals as per Section 3-914.A.1 —6 of the Community Development Code; • The Deviations standazds as per Section 3-601.C.3.i. v; and • The General Criteria for Commercial T�ocks as per Section 3-601.C.3.a—g. 3. That the development pro�sal is inconsistent with the fflllowing: • The Dimensional Standards with regard to dock setback and width as per Section 3- 601.C.3.h.i.a and c and 3-601.G3.h.iii of the Communiry Developrnent Code;and • The Deviations standazds as per Section 3-601.C.3.i. iii and iv. Dased upon the above,the Planning and Developmcnt Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Developrnent application to permit a 96 square foot addition to an existing 852 square foot Multi-Use Dock as accessory to an existing attached dwelling with a decrease in the side (west) setback from 32 feet(one-third of the width of the property) to 10 feet to an extension of an existing catwalk and 12 feet to a proposed boatlift associated with slip seven and approximately 26 feet to a proposed boatlift associated with slip six, a decrease in the side (east) setback from 9.5 feet(ane-tenth of the width of the properry) to five feet to a proposed davit and an increase in the maximum width of a dock from 71.25 feet (75 percent �f the width of the property} ta 75 feet (78.9 percent of the width of the property), under the provisions of Community Devetopment Code (CUC)Section 3-(i(�I.C.3. However, should the applicant limit the request to extending the two center catwalks and instalting any prnposed boatlifts/davits as consistent with all appiicable setbacks (i.e. boatlifts/davits associated with slips 2, 3 and/or 4), they the request could be supported by the Planning and Development Department. In the event that the application is approved as submitted or modified as suggested by staff or in some other fashion by the Community Development the following are propased Conditions of Approval: Condi#ions of Approval: General/Miscellaneous Conditio�is 1. That the final location of all catwalk extensions, docks and davits be consist with those as appmved by the CDB; 2. That use of the docks be for exclusive use for the mooring of boats residents and/or their guests and that the docks are not permitted ta be rented, leased or sold separately; 3. That issuance of a development permit by the City of Clearwater does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and daes not create any liability an the part of the City for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails Communiry Development Board-November 20,2012 FLD2012-08015-Page 13 of 14 � V�I�A�I ni�W.i Levei II Flexible t Applicatbn Review-DRAFT ��NIIVG k D8YE40Pl�NT �� DF VEI.OPM75NT REYtE;W DI V ISIUN u � � .�,.. .: . .. . � . tu obtain reyuisite apprcrvs�l5 or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state ar feciert�l ageney or undertalces actions that result in a violation of state or federat law; 4. That all other applicable tocal, state and/or federal permits be obtained before cornmencement of the development; Timing Conditions 5. That application for a building permit be submitted no later than November Z0, 2U13, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407; 6. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150 percent of its rated capacity;txnd 7. That prior to the issuance of any permit, all requirements of the General Engineering,Traffic Engineering and Fire Departments be addressed. �_______--- Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: �-----'��j~Hh~, r Mazk T. Parry,AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS:Location Map;Aerial Map;Zoning Map;Existing Surcounding Uses Map;and Photographs Community Devalopment Board November 20,2012 FLD2012-08015-Page 14 of t 4 MARK T. PARRY . 1655 Linwood Drive Tel: (727)742.2461 Ciearwater, FL 33755 E-mail: mparry(p�tampabay.rr.com SUMMARY OF QUAL/FICATJONS A dedicated, AICP certified professional Pianner focused on coM�ibuting to the field of Urban Pia�ning experienced in public and private sector planning. An excelient commurncator, able to effectively ir�teract wifh ci�ents, local govemment o�cials and business professionals at all levels. Experienced in various aspects of urban design and planning, zoning regulations and permitting. os.fECnvE To secure a Planning position which will allow me to continue improving the buift environment and my community through sound and innovative planning and design principals. EDUCATION COOK COLLEGE, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, New Bnanswick, NJ B.S. Landscape Archibaccfiare Major, Urban Planning Certiflcation B.S. Environmental Planning and Design Certificate Urban Planninp Golden Key NationaJ Honor Society; 5igma Lambda Alpha American Planning Association(Florida Chap#er); member AICP#020597 4U-hour OSHA (Hazwoper) Training EXPERIENCE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, CITY OF CLEARWATER 04/12-Present 08/98—04/05 Lead Planner; Senior Planner/Acting Development Review Manager • Responsible for nonresidential and single/multi-famity site plan review and permitting. . Assist in the implementation and subsequent review of the Community Development Code. � Responsible for assessing a�d writing Communiry Development Code amendments. • Land Development Caie development, interpretation and application. • Provide, inspect and direct landscape review/des�n. . Acting Development Review Manager 9/99—11/99 and 01/05—03/05. • Manage and direct Associate Planners. • Review, process and present variancelconditional use, land use/zoning aUas amendment and annexation applications at in-house and public review meetings. • Principle Planner in crea6ng and implementing Clearwaters Downtown Desig�Guidelines. Assisted in the implementation and application of the Clearwater powntown Redeveiopment Plan. DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, CARDNO TBE 04/05—04/12 Senior Planner • Planner of reco�d for Cities of Indian Rocks Beach, Seminole and Clearwater and Town of Belleair. . Responsible for nonresidential a�d sinqle/multi-family site plan review and permitting. • Perform site design and inspectbns. . Provide technical planning support for engineering department. • ProviKie support far Zoning Code, Comprehensive Ptan, Zoning and Land Use Plan amendments. • Research and write Evaluation and App�aisal Reports. • Create and update Special Area PlanslForm-based Codes. • Provide CADD support. • Assist with creating�edevelopment markedng rnaterial. • Perform technical environmental services including soil and groundwater sampling. GREENSCAPES-GLD, MARLBORO, NJ 9�92—6�98 Designer/Owner • Founded and estabiished a local garden and landscape business. • Plan and overaee installadon of comme�cial and residential�andscaping projects utilizing a variety of CADD and photo-manipulation programs. • Develop and impiement advertising prvgrams, brochu�es and graphics. . Estimate, bid and negotiate jobs. • Source and negotiate purchase of materials and equipment. • Manage,train and schedule installation crews. LONGSTREET FARM, MONMOUTH COUNTY PARK SYSTEM, HOLMDEL, NJ fi/87-8/93 Prograrn Supervisor • Assisted in formula4ng and running children's summe�program("Hayseed"). • Created and cao�dinated daily programs and schedules for 6-9 year old groups. • Supervised several other programs throughout the year. • Created a demand which was twice the program's capacity after the first year. COMPUTER SK/LLS Access, Micrasoft Office, Microsoft Works, ClarisWorics, MS Word, La�d Designer Pro, Permit Plan, Excel, Comerstone, AutoCADD, PowerPoint, Publisher .1,1,� ..'_' ^, i i n U v i. _ � .7 rt. •,;1,. ,,�. ;:tS� I �,1� _ '�I�� . � , - i `;� �""�'� ' )� �+ , 1 � f � , � � ` +' � �t � � I� � e, �� f 1 ; � t . .�t,' �h, _ — -w�., � �j� , ��; � ',�,.�► � � � �+ �1�1 J ,: ; I �� .... . 'y`�• d.a '°,.. . .,,..-.,,. ,.'.i��:'�.:,._ t.. ^. � � � ..�:�:_�*.. .� � �� ^ �� . k��;�.. ,�, �'i. ' �� yi�. .� � ' . . ��i<<. - Lu��hulf� �A'� �u V'I�.i.urn�� ; ,.,,;�. �i ;�t 1�', i�,;i , ��..,, � r � ��i�� , � 4 fi ,�` � '�� , _w r , ..,,.: ......, . . .. , . . � . � � �-- . _ . _ ,��. ..,:�, '' ' � , ' y�� , � n n� f�►�"�+" �� _ . ; .-_: -- �,yl�,;.� e..�. , �,�w,; � ;�' • i' 'a�, ,�, ;. � i . ._ nw��. f... t�?��\�• �cJ '^ , • LL � .. �r �,. �� —.b �,�,-..c�� f; � � � �.��i,�� . r � , �� _: .. ;. �� . � - '� . � �� , �,.. ♦ , . �,, ��.�r � ! � � � � �. �, �� . ; • - � �, _� ,��'��•;, �.. �.._ _. _ , . •, ,;� ,;: � � " r ' � � �, �t�� ;`"'�=� ._ ,��t � � _.,_ .. . � � a . . `�� ,�.;,: �� r � j. � ........... ,..,..c ..:��, . . •�' € � � • .�: ` , ___� �.�` �__..�._.�� _ - �' .l" t\'\, , . .�:, '`., � I r,�:b,ni ,��. . � tb��urr nt ,nc l uukin:�t V ,��,nc n1�tlic ccntci ialt�all.�.nni c�i�lin� huatlilt. �i � � � # � .� . ,.,�.` '... -,, .� _ .. ; _ , *ar`...l;�A' � � . - r �+�: �� y�i�,�� , i1N�,.�� t �__"', � . �� e. �} � ��y� �. �� ..,.. *�1 ' �—.t i��. ! r.�� .� �' LLl.. • �� *S :.. r . ;� 'M I � ��"'{ ( �� S �'�> .� �� . .. .. r�._. � ( ,��...: \ �� , ,.... ,, � k A � � ! � _ '1 �.11.:, rti ,�� , �rt�r 300 VENETIAN DR1VE Fi,n2012-08015 GRANADA ST it � � ` • k� � x .� 3� CHARLES Z ST ' �' � IVA ST 3 _ �SEOEEVA ST SEDEEVA SUNNYnN F pR � {{� W ` < ��- SUNSEI POINT RD w POINT � PROJECT ca� � � � s --�. $/TF = � � �, s � � �F�'S� pJ� Q j CALUMET i��'t' ,�n� � 1 I�� ai NOKOMIS � � �E�—��I_—.—_ �� \ �e� r �oQUOis -7 --- � ----- � PRINCESS � _ /-J ,� OSAGE �peG��\� � PLEASANT� �---J i ` � /- MOHAWK <� ? eu 5---___� ��°� / cr � � �--� o Z 0 A W ST � �� M�rvr ��o oHr n < 3 � c� yt� MINNE`� �6 BECKETi g �� --.J` J� MARSl�fA�L � � BECKETT ST -- ._ �-...._-------�� MARSHALL ST a --- � �ocarioN Owner: Nick Szirmai,Association President Case: F1D2012-08015 Site: 300 Venetian Drive Property Size: 0.498 acre site PIN: 04/29/15/93895/000/0010 Atias Page: 259B II � GLEA R WA?'ER HARBOR � , , � �.'� � � : . ,..: ,, . x _. � � , '� ~'�� ► � . "'" �a" „ �� . �+� } '� ��. ,� # �� • i� �e �Y +� .� � �� , , a� 1�� i � ' , - � � ..,..� . . � � • � �. - A � �„«�r � ,� �� , ..' '�� 4 . v �� ., � : �, �� x . � ' . .. �. �". � �,, , � � � . +t" �, � ; �, � + . .. - � /} „ " �r �.� � r� � �,� # .� ��..._.� s. `,„� ,t. _ , � � � .�n /� � �.;.. . � ' .c _a,:t .:�i �� r� �� ' ,R t� ... , s .. r- _ , ... ..... � . ., q �I . I �, ~ . .p ' .'.._¢I a y� �� .� �J �w�wr . �, d �� . ' *r ..,� � _. . � � � . . � , � � ' '„� '�� ' � �1 � � 1 ^� �," , '� ��l.yl..'�llL� �7" � � � �, � �. � ,„ �� ,� � , ,,., ,.. ..�° j � ��-�� y„ 'w '� �. � .+� �'" d►' +1 �, , � °� ti , �x e � a � .� , ,� ,, x �� ♦ ,�,> -�, � � � , . , . . � � � - .: ... � ,�, , r. , 9 �� , . . .., ,, ,, �,.. �� , � . � � � #,.•..�` i �+, �� _ - � I 4 u�k. � � i �• � . „ „ � z u t,71� �r+�� ,7 f z�+� � t iY`� �z �� .., . � .., _ � � . . , .. � � , _ . . � - E�► ��. • s `or�e%_ �',t ,. �.. "� . � � _ n._ �- AERIAL Owner: Nick Szirmai.Association President Case: FLD2012-08015 - -- --- - _--- _ __ --P - Y __ __ -- - ---____. Site: 300 Venetian Drive Pro ert Size: 0.498 acre site _ _ _-- __ ___ . -- _ _ . __ - PIN: 04/29/15/93895/000/0010 Atlas Page: 2598 � � 3 CLEARWATER HARBOR � _ a I , -� � 1; _ 1, ' i ;' i � � I �, `, � � �S � � ,' � I � ' 0�, / i i .- .. � ; � , � f � � � '�,� ., ��--`� / ; ; ___ _ _ � �� _...._ - � �I8� 1880 � i D � I �-� � i �� --._... _ ' � -- �� ; / � � �i � ,, m �---j''a� -- � � �� e5o �J � i �� `\� , m ''�� \ � �� ;' '�Os/R : 7810 '}B'f � � i i f81a � i f837 i i i � � � � j � .. ..______ _--.. I I � ,a� I, , T ' ' ta.� � � ;, � � t933 � _ te3� i , 18� ` � -- 1840 i - �---'--.".. 1810 ,' � 1` �` __� \ ^ / i , � ,� M�R � , , . � � ,a��;� �_" ' � � ' � � � �� - � � _ � ; � / ' � I'ro .._ ... .y �� MIN'N �I I i J`/ `J \ * I� '•, �� I ! .- ry 0 �o i 0; ' � _. .. 18?4, . ....fBtS . . .. � * `• �� o h �' � � * b a� r $ $ ' v e I *�-�-f-�.ir_.__ � . .'. �, � , �'. '�� ' 1 1811 ' i � � � � ( � � � ' ��1ti�DR � i � __ _ . . . ..._ . .. ___ `:,. 0 ! fdi5 � � i ..' m n '�; n i. a ---1a18� ��. 1Ef21 �+ � � � n � $ i � � ° v� 18i8�' .... . o '�. iBi1 � {�� j � � � 180f �, ^ NOKO� � y � 1 1 �an ' I- ' j ; _ �__ __ _ M1S ST ' �l �aos � _ , ,soe, -- - - , zoNiNG Owner: Nick Szirmai.Association President Case: FL02012-08015 _ — _ - _ Site: 300 Venetian Drive Property Size: 0.498 acre site __ . . �__ __ _... _---- __ _--- -- __ __ PIN: 04/29/1 S/93895/000/0010 Atlas Page. 2598 ' Q0 � i CLEARWATER HARBOR � � - - - - - .--- - � ____ _ a ,S ,e „ ,a ,9 � ,� r � ,� � t� 2t ei ' 13 N o m � � a .°p'. x � ° $ �°• I�� I o ( _ °3 J t2 ' `�Si _ ---------— ____;` 18� g s� `M � - — �a�.eo — — — r $ n „ �8 � � - ,� , _ - - - �� 1560 � SEE PLA f R�1 � � h � E � � � t ' � � � � y � _ � � � � � — � _ — — + �� 29 2B 27 � 28 �' 25 2� � —_ � �ye(�Iao 1 / � 6 ' ,._... . ... .. ___-._____. ._. ..�� I�.' _I 9 1811�p r — � ° _i0 �s� 938f►4 � — r � In� �' .-- -- _ � 0 _ _ a_ , L'_ � ! e � 1a37 31 L +Z ( I _ 7_ i is3b � � � ld�0 � � " —,— —•— r-� __._ _ ____ uim Q - - 2 � I � � i e . Z — - -� � � � I �eas � 19J7-33 � _ —;— ��7 � k � I 5 1t9a i -- - --" _ �cww... +e•o (� — — ,'— -�� + li � r — � � I � � 2 — _ — .��o�n P�Ma �+ I�- ..{_� � 1a3� 0 � 35 � � � 83872' � I 6 � 5 I 1 3 ' Z ( t — _ _s_ � I � � ' I I s I '" � ��'�i'�o e w I � � � �„a a ;r s , ��i � � 1s 8 CALUMET ST �J3 '' A �N�--- -_ - �' * p� r' i°^y q.�'. ''�'� � ' I � � I ! b 4 .�L� ,8,r �'r z f w � � � � ` �<o ta �oa � 1 � — —�— (� (° I i � O �� —I Z #��t■ � � g I... I � tatt• ' P° M° "M� c � e VENETIAN POINT DR 5 .,roz y 1a ( �' �°'„I � a� � y „�. wt iara - - � ,o�„��a�r��,. ,s �a�2 �s� 9 � � � «, � � g� i : M—TM•�a�e _ �� 1 � I g � 8 5 � � 3 � � 1 2 -�- z � 2 ' $ NOKOMIS ST - — — �so taoe Exisr�NG coNQirroNs Owner: Nick Szirmai,Association President Case: FLD2012-08015 --- ----- -- ------ �-- . _ __ -—._ _----- Site: 300 Venetian Drive Property Size: 0.498 acre site - -- - _______ _ ____ _ _ __ ___._ _ PIN: 04/29/15/93895/000/0010 Atlas Page: 2598 � j o Planning & Development Department � C earwater Flexible DevelopmentApplication � Detached Dwellings, Dupfexes orAssociated Accessory Use/Structures IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFpRMAT10N. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, iNCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICAT�ON. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY,AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLtCATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED,STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FIIING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $300 PROPERTY OWNER(PER DEED): �I I C. SZ Y'YYl \ �"1 �C�.�(�O(/� T{,eSIC��► !I MAILINGADDRESS: � �Sl�lil�� C.�� .�7�7 PHONE NUMBER: �a�' Ua� — ��-q3 EMAIL: I1jC.ICSZ1f'YY1Q� Qn �QI��I'VI�.ICIk .nP� AGEIV I OF(F(tl'FZt�tIV I A I IV[: � MAILING ADDRE55: I O4 �Q-- � PHONENUMBER: —(�—��a—c�D� ��, C��.�c�� I��O EMAIL �.._�SA 1°U ArnG�OG�.S;COh"1 ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERIY: ��-h0.n �jh�V'�.� l Q��. � V 2�(32iy1 ��'� PARCELNUMBER(5): Q�- a�- � 5"Q3��5 — OQQ — DDO1 V�IA�� — � c�� LEGAL DESCRiPTI�N: �,�"L,Q,� �� SI Lp1�p�S U¢�Vy�yy�0� <� PROPOSED USE(S): Lxl�flnq l.R)NCXO 4�CX� —� DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTOE ca �1 � I � l�.IwQt,Q S O TY� I P� `�.�4�T Specificolly identify the request , 15 (�2�2� r � �'��Q�1c. ��"�L (indude alf requested code flexibiliry; � �/ �f�� , 1�„_v /�l,,r� � e.g., reduction in required number o� �Q d-"t �"�«•'�`tC�S�� porking spaces, height, setbacks, lo n � �--�� size,lot width,specific use, etc.) ,��-�-��I�� p#'� (J�p A�d h(�U'�, a �- C� ��(1,�� ' �$ � � _SIx.P#-_(� Ir1.�C9...��k.dt lL VC�.<��lcQ,1c.��°.�_�S �� -� -- r:��c��-�_, S � .#1._� Irt� a s�b ��vc�,rim.m-c� � I' �(�C�f�X' ��ns�-aA1L l�f1v�-1's ��n�s sl-� . Planning&Development Depar�ment, 0 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756,Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562�3865 Page 1 of 7 Revised 0�/12 � � o Planning& Development Department � C earwater Flexible DevelopmentApplication � Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: �dJ� FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: �,` EXISTING USE(currently existing on site): 1"tT�i(�Q� ��Jl�?('X� W 1'1"V\ �� PROPOSED USE(new use,if any;pius existing,if to remain): ��iY�c Il./17�J� �� b (� Q v SITEAREA: p�l, �Q`l� sq.ft. � 4 -I acres GROSS FLOOR AREA(total square footage of all buildings): N�� Existing: sq.ft. Proposed: sq.ft. Maximum Aliowable: sq.ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA(total square footage devoted to each use,if there will be multiple uses): N'�' First use: sq.ft. Second use: sq.ft. Third use: �; �? FLOOR AREA RATIO(total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): IfJ'�" Existing: Proposed: Maximum Allowable: BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT(1�`floor square footage of all buildings): �I� s ft. %of site � Existing: q ( ) Proposed: sq.ft. ( %of site) Maximum Permitted: sq.ft. ( %of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA(green space within the parking lot and interior of site;not perimeter buffer): NI�} Existing: sq.ft. ( %of site) Proposed: sq.ft. ( %of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA(parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): +\ Existing: sq.ft. ( %of site) NI� Proposed: sq. ft. ( %of site) Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567; Fax:727-562-4865 Page 2 of 7 Revised 01/12 __ __ , , IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO(total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: N� Proposed: Maximum Permitted: DENSITY(units,rooms or beds per acre): NI�} BUILDING HEIGHT: �� Existing: Existing: Proposed: Proposed. Maximum Permitted: Maximum Permitted: OFF-STREET PARKING: NI 1 � Existing: Note:A parking demand study must be provided In conjunction with any request Proposed: to reduce the amount of required off-street parking spaces. Please see the Minimum Required: adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information. _ _ __ _ - - _ . _ — ------ — --- --- -----—— WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $ �D 00 /��,�.¢„�� l��u�-�w ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALLADJACENT PROPERTY: � � ��/— I North I� / �m pR so�cn: L_.f(11 p� East: �p�R West: � � L..Y11�R STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this 8� day of representations made in this application are true and ��r ��.to me and/or by accurate to the best of my kn ledge and authorize City representati s to s a d photograph the , who is pe s nally known has property describe in this p cati'on. produced as identification. � � `�S � Signature pert ow er or r present ive Notary public, My commission expire : �� L.�YIt�- Nawr RMiNa•�b of f1orW� • .• Mr CoaMn.E�pNM Non�.2014 CoR�ab�bn A►��Ot�S sond�d TMa�ph MMlon�l Notry A�.. Planning&Development Department, 100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearvvater,FL 3375fi,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562�865 Page 3 of 7 Revised 01112 i o Planning& Development Department Y Clearwater Flexible DevelopmentApplication � Site Plan Submitrtal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALI_ FLD APPLICATIONS FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING, DUPLEX, OR ACCESSORY USE/STRUCTURE ASSOCIATED 1MITH EITHER A SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING OR DUPLEX SHALL INCLUDE A PLOT PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 0 Responses to the General Applicability criteria as set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of ali public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S.§723.083,the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. 0 If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatiift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawail or other si milar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. ❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH (diameter at breast height), and species on the parcel proposed for development with a DBH of four inches or more and identifying those trees proposed to be rernoved. ❑ A site ptan with the following information: ❑ North arrow,scale,location map and date prepared. ❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Controi Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area,and the Base Flood Elevation(BFE)of the property,as applicable. O Location,setbacks and use of all existing and proposed building and structures. O Location of all existing and proposed parking areas, sidewalks and driveway�. ❑ Location,type of material and height of all existing and proposed fences. O Location of ali existing and proposed utilities,including water,sewer,gas, and stormwater. ❑ location of ali existing utility easements, including Official Records book and page numbers, and any proposed utility easements. ❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height, buiiding materials, and concealment of all mechanicat equipment located on the roof. �� ° Clearwater P�anning & DevelopmentDepartment Flexible Development Application " General Applicability Criteria 1.The proposed development of land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. There is similar land development in this Cove.The dock immediately to the left has a boat lift on the shared property line with the subject property.The Condos across the Cove have similar coverage and character(#1850/1840 N.Ft.Harrison) and have docks within close proximity. 2.The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposal to extend the 4 existing catwalks 12'to the Tie Pilings does not negatively affect navigation in and around the Cove, or otherwise prevent any property owners from accessing their docks.Any boat lifts in these slips would have no impact on navigation or the accessing of neighboring docks.The proposed catwalk extensions would not prevent neighbors from installing a code compliant dock if one is not present. 3.The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood or the proposed use. There will be no adverse effect to health or safety with the proposed catwalk extensions or the boat lifts.These catwalk additions would in fact add to safety in boarding and disembarking from vessels in these slips. Most of the boats at this small condo dock have to bow in due to low water in the Cove. It can be very precarious to board from the bow of a boat, especially with children or elderly parents. 4.The proposed deve/opment is designed to minimize traffic congestion. N/A-There will be no effect on traffic congestion. S.The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. , The proposed development is consistent with in this Cove.There are many docks and boat lifts here, some that come very close to property lines, there are Condo docks with 30' catwalks or longer, with boat lifts. The docks in the Cove vary in size and there are over a half a dozen roofs in existence here. 6.The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The proposal to extend the catwalks 12' to the existing Tie Poles will not adversely affect the surrounding properties here in the Cove.The proposal to install Boat lifts in some of the slips does not adversely affect the surrounding properties either.Almost every dock in the cove has one or more boat lift of one kind or another.The condo next door to this project has approx.4 slips with boat lifts in them. Therefore this project does not have any adverse effect visual or acoustic in nature. J�•�tiy� o Planning& Development Department � C earwater Flexible DevelopmentApplication � Flexibility Criteria Venetian Shores Condo "Any Multi-use Dock with a deck area exceeding S00 sq.ft. shall be treated as a Commercial Dock. " All Commercial docks shall be reviewed for compliance with the following criteria: a.Use and Compatibility- The addition of 12 ft. in length to these 4 existing catwalks will aid in the boarding of Owners Boats safely and with more ease for elderly and younger family members. The overall length of the catwalks will be 24' and this length is consistent with the slips/docks in the vicinity. The installation of several boat lifts and a set of davits is compatible & consistent with the Cove, where almost every dock has a way of picking up a boat in its slip. b. Impacts on existing water Recreation Activities- The catwalk extensions and the requested boatlifts are within the existing slips and will not impact the any type of recreation activities. c. Impacts on Navigation- The catwalk extensions only go out to the existing tie poles, as do the boatlifts and therefore will not affect or have any changes on navigation of adjacent waters. d. Impacts on Marine Environment- The catwalk extensions and boatlifts will not impact the natural marine habitats; this area is mostly muck over sand. There are no grass flats or shell fish in this location. ° e. Impacts on Water Quality- The catwalk extensions and boatlifts will not affect water circulation nor cause erosion or any change in existing water quality. f. Impacts on Natural Resources- The catwalk extensions will not have an adverse impact on wildlife, marine life, vegetation, aquatic habitat or other natural resources. This is a minimal dock addition to an existing dock. A boatlift does not adversely affect marine life, in fact it helps by letting more sunlight get thru to under the bottom of a boat. Planning 8 Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567;Fax:727-562-4865 Page 6 of 7 Revised 01/12 ° Clearwater Planiiing & DevelopmentDepartment Flexible Development Application � Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S)IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL(USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). Venetian Shores Condo Section 3-601 C.3.i. Deviations. "Applications for Deviations to the Dimentional Standards set forth in C.3.h, have the approval process based on the following:" Request:This is an existing dock with 8 slips. Please see the attached permit from 1989.The dock itself has a 10' side setback from each side property line.The owners are proposing to extend the existing 4 catwalks out to the existing tie poles that are located at the ends of the slips. They are also requesting the installation of several boat lifts that also need a setback variance. Please see the drawing of the dock with the proposed additions. The Owners are requesting these catwalk extensions to aid in boarding and disembarking their boats.The biggest concern is Safety. They want these small slips "user friendly" and safer for family members, elderly parents and small children, and that is why we have come to this hearing. The water is relatively shallow here in the Cove, the boats have to be bow in, and/or up on a boat lift, e�ther way, the extended catwalk will create a safer environment for boarding a boat. i.A dock of/esser length poses a threat to the marine environment, natural resources, wetlands or water quality. There is no length variance. The catwalk extensions and boatlifts will not affect the marine environment or habitats. This area is mostly muck over sand.There are no grass flats or shell fish in this location. ii.The propsed dock location needs to be adjusted to minimize impacts relating to criteria set forth in sec.3-601.C.3.b-g. - The proposed Catwalk extensions could actually help with water quality. With lower water situations a boat moored bow into a slip helps keep the props out of the muck and keeps the silt from being churned up. The proposed boat lifts are considered beneficial to the marine environment because they raise a boat out of the water which allows more sunlight to reach the subsurface. iii.A literal enforcement of the provision of this section would result in extreme hardship due to the unique nature of this project and the applicants property. This property is a higher density residential tucked in with a lower density residential on the water, towards a corner, in a small Cove. This is a bit less common in Clearwater.The age of these docks associated with the silting in of the Cove inside corners makes it more difficult to access and use your boat. The catwalk extensions would give you access to the stern of your boat, and make it easier to board. The boat lifts are the most common way for boat "storage" in a boat slip. Planning&Development Department, 100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567; Fax:727-562-4865 Page 6 of 7 , Revised 01112 Cpin a;nu�c- iv.The deviation sought to be granted is the minimum deviation that will make possible the reasonable use of the applicants property. This request is minimal and much needed to help with reasonable use by these Owners and their families.The catwalk extensions are only 12' long and go out to the slips existing tie pole. Making the catwalk as long as the siip helps you to access your boat from the stern. Boarding over the bow of a boat can be very difficult. Sometimes impossible,especially for families with children and elderly parents. Safety is of the utmost importance. v.The granting of the requested deviation wi/l be in harmony with the genera/intent and purpose of this section and will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimenta/or of adverse effect to the public interest and welfare. The catwalk extensions are consistent with docks in this area. There are other docks with similar setbacks, as seen in the dock immediately to the left. The catwalks at the dock immediately to the right are as long as the slips which aid the owners in boarding their boats. It is safer to board your boat from the catwalk at the stern and definitely much easier. There are boat lifts on either side of this property and additional lifts at this property will be consistent with this area. vi.No dock shall be allowed to deviate from the length requirements....N/A. Definitions: Boat lift:A metal structure that lifts a boat with a cradle from underneath the bottom of the boat. Has two upper beams held in place by four pilings.The boat sits between the upper beams and is parallel a dock or catwalk.The boat is lifted out of the water for storage. Davit:A metal cantilevered arm or crane, that uses one pole (per davit) set along side a dock or catwalk or seawall. It picks a boat up at the bow and stern, from the top of the vessel. No outer or far side poles needed. The boat is lifted out of the water-for storage.This system works fine for small boats only. bCOr> �Q ° Clearwater Ptanning& Development Department Flexible Development Application � Affidavit to Authorize ,Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed—PRINT full names: �1 P,��a.+0�1.� �S �o��.� �.�', N ic�Z. S�i r mr��. , ��o�Q,►.�' 2. That(I am/we are)the owner(s)and record title holder(s)of the following descrik>ed property: V�mo�_.�n.� �I1k31�QA.� �-� , 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for escribe r t : � �c�d �+ Ex�s+in9��a��yo�,+-�o��;r�g��o�es c,��rn�.�-.��.�ip. � Zr� '6vv� o to s • 4. That the undersigned (has/have)appointed and (does/do) appoint: � ��.C�4Q.�/h1>> l".�0��-�`� � �,�� as(his/their)agent(s)to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affec uch petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City rep,resentatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That(I/we),the undersigned authority,hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. f�rop Owner Property Owner 1. �_ �A , !�l i c� �2.i r mac:�, , �B'�p(�,N , P o rt wner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THIS C�J� DAY OF ��_ I�. , PERSONALLY APPEARED �� -��M�- _WHO HAV�NG BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. '�' WA M AYAN ��a�� Nota PublicSi nature ' ' M1►Con�.Ex/�►M Nov�,401� �' 9 �an�i0n i��t41 Notary Seal/St p eo�TM��y ommission Expires: _ Planning&Development Department,100 S.Myrtle Avenue,Clearwater,FL 33756,Tel:727-562-4567; Fax:727-562-4865 Page 7 of 7 Revised 01/12 _ '�.: "'d' .Tl.�— " _'" __ .,.._, ;L,�rICIr,L U�c ONLY} ._ , � ' � (I S�P�''`� � � ��i :G'•; G � � � 5'�' rot�le View _��.��.;L�: �„_ ao' T�TAL SQUARE FEET �J NEW SQUARE FEET WATERWAY WIDTH '�- $' \ � WATERFRONT WIDTH —��5 � , , / �i \ Plan Yiew I��(�d(�} �aPPlicant nnd edjaccntdock9) �.x1�+n �oVc�x�e�Cir,�D� � � 314-'3�1� � _ �. � I � $� ISaS � �.'a,x c a'�-o �et�av.Slr��r�s��Cor�do �(e,c�.�$,on,� �(�an �� `�� -�l�t�t�c�te -- 7�` � � � '� ,1�', �-----�- I D p� � �� 8 O I ( I oi' t2 �� 1` 11� �, DA�liks _ °—� u�. �i�o 1..►%4' ! ° — �a��. _ . _ �o�, i '- I 12' �� I � I � a ._1� ��-E� $� � �! ��, ___.�_8 -� �' c, - � � s z , 1 m � ,,� � , �' � ��E � n �� ti�8' � , . �� n . - � �L-U/ q = � � ' fl � � e � �v� `� �. �,' . ,� . - ;�� ' 1� � \'�' � �� I � - , S2�wa�u� . '1�30'--- SHOREL[NE , ) �„/��/J� h1unici ali A roval . alJ c.�' Water and Ravi atioa A rov�l �nuineer's_Seal -. �" , ��, vw��vr��y�� .(r � �w _- � b`�U.�� '�✓ � �� ; }�r; � u�� ;` �'�� ^^„�r,, �, a �- P;�. y�yF Q:� �V.C.�(y� �Y : . '�7Y ai'; �'��y. , ' �n es<, ,. ��:r� �'� � �.1r��h �� . � £� �'11 `rl3��_�.. �'� :, ��.v.� ��`,��' • '.�.+��a�� 1 d �'- �- �"'�' "�� o. J'i��p��Sa7��5"'��.e� ��4 i � 472^5�� - BOUNDARY SURVEY SEC7'ION 4, T09fNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANCE 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTY, FLOR[DA VENETIAN SHORES CONDOMINIUM � _ I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: C�MDrSiq�uCEME SWiw�.f5�[ORUEP K�0 uUF'��SNDN[ �HBEGmuHNG�IXD�MENCE'rvCkin�Pn�Rn�GEi:0 ir[Lw[R*FFROBOUwO RE��.Sj[C�ti�v.�V'�qiiU�.!t . �(OU�!rfR�v BW�+D�Fr O�„EPIr L0� BWt�O�Rr p�p�0�a[p[i[�UVVCO NC� rvnn[' v.t 95.5��(El uORF OR�E55.� Pqtit�,iwt�+IX+i C Cx1EN50rv N�iHt v.ESi R�� 0 � :nip P�OCxs�t.�rExC[�:OUiw.n I� � �S�auC[J]5�CC'uOPE DR�(55.�� . .� fu� f0, nu,!X�q.�LO �rCN[C E�51 n OSrqyCC O�55.0�C(* uOkC OR,.C55. 0�NC PqNi 0!8[G�vNf. Ih � � _ �_ Y��' i;'�, 'i I ��/, o . �,f. 4�� LEP.RWAI�R i%'%1. E�AY I,'� NEST(D) 95.50'D /�'�wr. r...i� ... - �N89'2}'05'N(N 95.27 M ;f� s..e =�o ____-_-- _ ' _ �ruw __----_-- � � 2� �i.r J W,' i �e I .�a �b I �or�s 1O ¢ ,A ,-, I Ks�BOi�sP�N'sxn ps III � �3 � �.e.i� ccs z N� � �R �� = u � I ��\\\ \\` ho _ Q � b ° _ �: � � i y �m 00 I �� \ R ``��\\ _� `d,. NZ _d b v[u[,�^COV[ "sy, _ �o q ; n �„�ccs n.ze SURVEY NOTES: I -� `�� $ x ,a»«»�,.K,�.��:�.��«�a.��,��o�.z,.w,wo,2,��.��K�os i �Nf nAN PaNT �a F LOT i/ma � .�n o,roc.,.u.r a KK�,.�oK wbo�„�o.��.<.,00no,r Pia j ��.' ORlyf BLOCK 7 � r��o�.,ucMa i � � ..,�o.:m��H: � i � -'='� �,� .,a nc...��..ss..�,..o Ka�.n oo��c ,..,.5��t s.,o-.�o-., ,a ` tm•s I \ �� asnr� ..�a„a we,w acmos a�A.��.:«. . �mm. � ��'� � ��cs:o�.�w.4 vEOrao - � �I s (�-o� �p �° �.�..ar...a.c o.s oaai. _ �..000 ra.a .��,: a.< SYA90L LEC�D � � ° � �y� 8 2� ~ "'s PE.�:a� �,EO o p.�Fp �> 2 $TORV � mwu[x,.no��rs rww[o�o.�5 sa.t+ro o-nh.o v.. .x p CONOOMINIUM BUILDING �03 k3oo �.:.'�;,."`o, E J »PaEK.�Ea Wn�N. � z z >> _ -s*o��..,�.ac �n ,I u no' ^� . �[� . .. .. ' SURV VOP'S Rill-1 4il�. II . � E CE C O'- ; % G � EAST(D �95 0 D �_ '^s . � .a �e�a 3 O I e I�N89'S706'�M BS B'M ' ____ _____ � � � .�.c E.c�.�o. �� .ew.�. ��o�.. £_—e_�_.�.. �.�.. �.r.w.w..om r..o��......�sso v.,o..�.o..n..�o � € r ce.c cwe i - " n,...�.. ' ° ABBFEYIA710N LFC,BA L_--_ SUN-SET DRIVE�o�•n �...,��.,,,,. I i _. -r-. VENETIANpDRIVE�re�� - —__. .'— .___ _ ,- --_ .__- _ -, £ �` ....,�� arz�^�^^ w� c�K'°" so i I . _ _- �._—_ __. -- t-- I R n en e � i av I—_ _._- .__._ _ .—__—. ! c4n : Iuy _ _ r-- .-. -- � _-�..—_ —_— ._ € � �� = �,,,,�„w .... �F,IiU�� 1 .`};N�'�('E�` i�l� � f� �'"°" ��: °°' _ 1822 DREW SL SUITE 8 ova°' � . � W C AR AT R F , LE E L 33765 ,i w o , �m o�.xt.s M�i I � .� ..,�,�.<o„��,�..,�. FtZ,4�i:F'wP. � ..�.«w,.��w,�,� ��. � a•a..so� -��..M.� ��'..i d - ` PHONE: (727) 447-1763 iLJJ .A.. � �_ _--- tB)ab6 � . • ,, , ,,. ; _ v - ,,, .._ � i ,� � e�,'�"4�.`1�'� _ 1u) . +�.... � . i�,,. .... . .. .. : A.. . � ,� w; ., . ..r �r . -�°==� m„�r�r� . , � _... .. _,y''"' � , ...� —�.--.._� . ...... . °:: _ . ._._ .. �� R� , ., � < q {°�+ ,:' �' _ ��; I P�M��4� � ��'. 3'� . _ ` � . • ' /� _' / f .a � ,`� ' . . _ _ .':-�� . '.�i;::�'_- � , * ..� r d t �" .. � j x � �'�� . i�4� _ .�:,�. �.k, '4 ..\ �\ i �. � I _... �, t . .,.... . » ' . . ..�� . , , ._ r� � _' ' , \ �� \� \ ` � �l��Q.vJ O�r �C�S-�n9 Ca'�C�-�C,S �y ' F „ _ 'Y"' W ......_ .. • �` � • '�' � � � � . ail�'` - - "F"�'f _ . � �... .aAr. .�, .� .. , . -«� ., � �,-_ . ._--- _ . . . ��' :� �� -- . _ . .::. _ ° : _ . - : - .. . `?` .__.,.__ �� w �� .a, - �. _.._� ��. ."�__..y..� ..�� _ 'sz� � : v ��` �' a - °.,�-�� -a�-.. _�.. .. ...:..� .� � � , . `� � �`��`�,. � , .. .�... ._.. . ...., .. . , �� - Yxk- . • �, �, -cw � t�a.° , �; ,� ".. . ,�. — �-� a.� � � . ,` � ' � ...� �� 1,f„� . � � .___ . . . -F _.- _ r. i1,� � , � , '11. . � � i " � .,�� '�' . � �l. ., '.w!�-'�`i�" � -._ _� rw� . .�: .. . ._. � " 7�� .. ^,.,� � ......4�.. . _ 6�`�� '» � � . v -:. . ,..�_< , --.��-- `'r��..r im;.'.- . . `� �� . .�.- -. �. � ' '�a: I � . �� . . �"r�. .,. ......_...,.. �,� - _ �.,_:- �._._._, a _ _ � `y:��T�U '`�J '��, a�. =* �..� . � 9�` �' � � _ '� �,�� . � °'� �- ��M�� . � ; � �r , � - - - ,. ., , - <��.� � ,°;� � � , . ._„ p. � � - ___ . _,_ �: �; .� .. r'� ;,,�.:. ,, �R , .. �._.�_. o'�` ,�{y...ry�1M1� �a � §� .� ' � y�.`I�K' ._ _� c:��' ..��_y0..�" � � ... �,�� v�t�� _ C�� w�,►,, �z�- �� ; � � �. �... ,,. p.�. : r <� x c _ir...�..�� _ : . �. . .:, .. , _. . . ,. - �iaa - _ . „ � - . - - � �' .- ' , ,�r- - - • : : , x'�`�#� lI w*�r�< . ��.� a��. _ � � 4 A "4 �< . x w� i � � ��', � � ... � � � � �. � �. . . . � . � � � � � � 4 W� � � � � �_� .�,�_ - ._........�. r �'" . a ti: _� .. ., � �, _ ' . ��' d � e"- �.:_.-_ ...., � � . r ` -� —�� . . - �?" .,: � .r - _ � - _ �- � � �;+ . � ��.,.. • -,_ . �, '� - ��,,.,�.;.�,.<... . � � � - . _ -��- �- � - � - .�- ° � � . .., . ��,.. - '�'7`.��'r,�;r+, � -` � �� _`�," , „ , �,�.'`,�� .. , _ . .,._. � �.-�� . .,., -- � � . � _ �,fr __ � ; � , ; *, � '... �3 �4� . .. ~ �� . � � „ 4 w /'°�%/i h�`l� i %r� t x. - 1 :��"�!� _ " '`f J,I►.�� ; 4 �� , , �' � ?�� t _ � . , - � t� �� i�� - � � �.. , . .�; .�, � • s ^ �!. A11." x �� : y � { . _ ' _,...-.^""""� . . — ' . _— '. . . ..v .,,�,a_. i .� � +�'l= . ....�.--._-- t � . , ,., ' -:► _.. . .. ` ,..,., ,. .. . _ � �'.»'. I � � _ _ � � -� _. �l��1i1 ` - - _ �. � -� ��1111�' '' _ � � _ . � �,� - � - �� . __ . � _ __ �: :�r: _ . .. r . _ .. . _ : ,_ j. -__ { . �.�. _ � __ .� � � .�, _ �' ' . . ..w . . ._. �y '.a� � "- . � �. , ' .. � , �.� , ` �a ` wi: -. .. `� ;�� . �=".�,"� _' � __ � . , _ _, , ...�. . _- - .� . � . � _ , �°� �, - - � � _ ..---�,—�°�=_ �_ -- - � 1 _ � � ._. _ _ L r �- _ 1�c�-� b� 3;'`�- �:t?lo��;i;st;s�,- �� t.�2�u2-- 'J�dcSL�'C�jOa"�C11�- `'�S ��P�n�.�-� "�U• � :�r �`a -. � _-. t � � ° .' � \ _ _ ,f�„ _ k � ` . � _ : � . �: ,�' - - - -- � - .�. - = �- .� � r _ fi, ,. �� ,w , ��(�''""' i � i ,� - .K . �,��i�/' • ,� . . ��.. . � .� �..��*�� ' " �� iG' � � � . r . . ��, �.. � �; �� .� . 3T. � - �. � � , _ �� . �� ,. __ ..�._.:- � _ �. . �� . �-y�_ • -.., - � - � _ ... . _t _ _ f - - - - � _.. • �,. ; r _ .�.- - ,_ .__.. , -,�• . _ - - � _ �i � - . . ..� ,.. .. . . . �..�.. . � � � � r — .v�.. .�- . . .c ��yue. . _� " ... ". "e ,..::.n 1 � : �e... �� " � i �,,. �.. 'di..a.. .r"• _. y� -- .'M�"' _ F 1C". � ^�� .,,_.. . . .. ,t:. M _.._�. r :. ��. . , . ".. _� Y� " . � ��. .. _ ...�� ... _ . . ... _ .. .. . ...�'`... -_ �ov ��..�;�, ��- a � �reui�s ��rr�t �c�k— 19`c��( . �O'O,� ,�,�1. n �1 , • r,• '�Q,~ �, �• �{''�_..L'�' �'��c•:.��t!..la' • ' � ��i � ' Q o �� kl � q � � 4• s'.�s' Rivaras � ^/�►►e'w+►k1 'Tt0 Aortot+� i; � ��" �YN�U W►.TtD AT WYN n , .• 'V K�rrs. rs�w�►►s s�w�s � o �.�s'�s►�rt� o o � _ x:�'►.r, s4L'r.r. � �aer.xWa � . .e � • Q � _ � • G �- MANJ U'*�lA1.K DO►lELQ =�A" PT N�iID[as OVS+Ia I A01/OLL PI(,i GAf's. 'rMR11 iOLT�p AriViRY rILINO EX�bf1616 OoCX o � W11[R LAIJD�ud j.�r7f� ` AppOG�1c.Ib'0it-01J EwST. DOC�C uI /1!�FICf D��PtD 4�u-�IiW�sifl COLT3, 2':i., '3 pt'QLiUa. O N O` N=o� �.��T _ . o' �� 3�ALJALL F'ROrt1c'fV � I ��KICrY L,�� -� � P �� E D �� <<�E � ��„ � � �' pV Wr�;t;:^ 6 UTIUTIES �I� ( ..� �l�' I I �= � O N U �fST011 o - uEU nJ. 6 . tt�TRSi►rnaur� r�oncr: 8- �I.IP P�T DOGK • - i'Ki�rflNb �►� s G�.EActl�ld.TG�. ,Ft_ �3-,1 ., rRa�sso ro�: _ � �;,... ��c�c o�d�us ��QLIA!/�iTN.Lti.lAC. $ SL.IP �ipAT' �Q ,� �•• •r w� � a;'� � VLLIIG� DRIVE ��7i/EY[N6�VENUE�/0 WXIt)� � � .r • �'. OI.O{MA11./L01110Al�!{/ 'i .°k;.jN�,�. !.4; '.��'�' GL4►?JaAT`iZ,Fl. Ihq�•tnn r�wst ;;., .A` • ' '.•��k�•'��I ��i FII•8 �� .� �C 11 MM�t40. .p Z . �_ . . . 'W'�1 . ' , . .'-IlI,�Ct� :i' ... . . ' . . ' � . . ... . . � . . •_' � �—, �- � �� _ � � ��I � , �� v � ` , �w. � �,� a � - .,rs�" , tx i . ��'�".,��, ��r G Y. _v �,u."''� ,.�'��" '" .. � �y. ? . ;�"*" 'K �. 3'�;a: nt�..� � 3 'R,'. . � �§�i"�,*rhN��,�ss�"* . '�Yati�'��"&=F � A��. d�. � �" *�R ,. ��# w �;„.� . *,", { . "c.'^;. �� ' ,4fi..� � �.. r r":..°.�°�°+�. 1^� '�' ��;.� ..�..*� .„ � ,^.. , ..�,z ; 't�,��`�g :. ''��,. ' o , =��,r'.� „, �i .� a� . �a �,;M1�s;:S� s� �.+ , r + w �� , . +�.<'. . ' .��.5. ,� ._. �. . r„�t �. � .,. �:: . � ,s�� .. ',. � x3�^ �i� � re":��. 4 . �. .. v ' � - . . .,4.. � . . "� ., .�� , £ �,r . t, YK ,,.� .��. 1 �* : m. � �cr".€x� ! ' �1 . P j4Af.f . .:4...'� ��'£d. :a�'� m ��F3 t '� �M' * �*� ,,�,z �� y4 �� r �� , � . � , " ' ,�.qne i�rt s�� a. ;c �-� �.A .a. �Y.g .'� .9 �S '�`'J�, .� � . ,� � ` � 1� � ��.. ��! „y� F �.w`5M� ��. 'i�..� a .§ 3 t:� .��/. .'1. • �F "� v ��i �� WI�W?".� . � ,�'y'� ? , ,�,'{jMy� fi�lx '�' �Ar_ 1 . . M - �- '�r � ��. ��:: �+ d � � ' �±�.., �t�� £ �J.M41� +� 4 � � �� • ,.�,��. _ ` ` M. "��, � ��'�' n '� +L+C° ..� ��r "� �4 '� "P±� �� `� �� , ; � , kk• ..� ryYa �K �` :# ."k. `w.:t9� k i WT^I . .�, � {. Ya �^ E � �R � � M � � k'�� ¥ �. � �� - �*, �� b � � '� " a' �� ' �' � .r_;�- � �" v�' �``°-� ..�a4.. � � t�'.. ��: � a.k a ��e 4, . ; �� . � .� , . . . �.p � �� " ? � "a3,�i".7� ' .., ii� - � 'Y§ �� ♦, . ' . . — _ � . ' �;� ��;'�""�- "�_ ..,,"�1 t , k �' f�, :.�„ '' ' � " ._.�.:� � . e � , -�; ... �� . >- ,.;� � ; r �' �� . , , � � � � . � : � ` x� �" �+ ,. . rF. .I��. ,. �' x, ��• rr '� ..e-$ � , � �.- � � � ,+�� '� � " , � �� _ ." .�, �;,.. _��k y,., � �.„ 6j��` r�: � ,'� � � E �}*��! wY '+� �� !,� .!k�.fi �y.�.��.. I� ��T �� +� I� • Ys L� �k, '� -� .: I\ �q � ( � � .. �-1 da . �a,�� s�l � -�.; � �.",.d a• � �+ . '« . �,.�� . a .• +- -. � :: �x,r� .,: .- . w „ = r %` � � �<�, . �,r _ , � .r . �� «; • � • �`�'��• � t�;!�.r� �'►#`.' ,� a, �.'1� 14 �, 5 + � �� „�'�r� »�".A a , �ibr e� � .� . - .. � .. , § Y-� ..r . *....� v � ir . a � � r,x.,. . + ` . I .��_. . �� . -_�_ �1825_._z _... i�"'e(.l_lk� `. ._..:._l...__ ._. . ._._ . �_ �� .: _ �� 2.5 �oo �� 4- �2l� . ��r�� — . I ¢.�;- �� ""1�e 'r � , k""� �� —�'��r`�" - - �-i--� , � - " + ` !#}�i-� '"'� �`. r` � i� r$�..;..�r' ' . ��T��'��- F j�� ,seQ `f"�1 �', .. � � r .y�l .._. ,., `.�1 f..sc . j _ � s_. t; �� .. ,RC' I �^ �s. 4, 1841 .. ^'w^'cw tG,f; � f � � �€,..:�+^' � ..} . ' i ^�.. r3�. �.� �'if.,.. `� ( t. �. G� .7.,.-.1 � .. �4 ,.�,� r�,�� '`' �� *tY�-^� �� f � � ` } ' �I s nyc,; �,'. ::r A ig �'�'� p . ,� I� �;i � ,a � ��.= .. �'1-� t vE r{ ,g I 1837'�� t ;�; �"��' ' ��. � 4 L� �..(fii 't" �� t�„' r*.'�1'; ,,�},� i f� ....«r-.> � r� �. � ,<^ �."-y7- .� °�°" 4 "s. em ` _ .{ �i � " � ,. � � i� ��k� -:��i"'� � ''. � . � y.. .� .... ...\ l ,� ,_ i ' ., � + # � �,�. ° *� y�'`t y�} {I f 835 � � � �, � h '_' r 1 11�,.t f .y l� � '` � 1 �'f.... ` `1 . . ..�4 �°�` �� iS• a""�1� ` ; • # l c _ t1.' : . � . �` '*�y� _.� � r� �� - `4: �.rr ` . ; �� :=r;4�.-�'' . , ,., � , _ . , ��, �,�. �, ,f I � _ }�� t: � r . .� �� ..,.�� J '"x -: �. � .� �� f'. I� �,. . �. , . , . _ . *. . . ". . l l ��.I . n�"�. .. �y ��" .r �. .ie Y.� --.^ .2. •.. k a.r:_�. . �. .:1 ' '.� ��. .. xx^•.yr�..'� �_P 4 'M � �— �I�I _.�� ..zy.�1�`'� .� ��; �-��'4-L � : ., �� i,' �� "`�"" �� n'-''vs� .� r^ � .x � � w. �� ,,;::�• �, , �':ii�,��- 1 r �� : q� ��'�� ' t , � � 4 ro��.'k� �Y `� ��;�""".r° tix �-�� J : � { ��;,,yi>�.�' rt�•.�'�_��.-� L ��.'.v �� .:.� .�, ` �� °�'��,:,..` _ ..,n y , r�� `� , �� f�, " � a M k ( � �k �. a y*1,.� .. �.. .[� �.rc��' " 1� � L a1�` � ' 1,' 2�^ph�--�.�. } " r _ " r . . i�'. .3;.a''�4�`��'.�. �$� • r 1 M1 9�.�� ,�"1.r �:. �.�• .. '.� 'k'`� 1t ..#` ..t' � *�`t � , � C*.,�M�.: r�. .. . t P . } _'� ,� : __ " '`' J _ . .. . ��. �T'v i�6 . ....wW. 1_....... . �_. . ._.. .. .a _ ._ . .. ..€. � � �� _. �J,e.use �,,�,. U �v-e� IL R--- rat�ie View TOTAL SQUkM FEET NEW SQUARE FEET WATERWAY WIDTH WATERFRONT WIDTH Plan View (apph=t and 5dj acut docks) WS41 om V, r7i -a- '514 - 3a ( 7 I)Mi+s Marine C0175trLlCtI017 /roc. We, u-- Cull am G- - ( �- C6 ^, w fNI �` .. k-3 fhl VTNIS-, '(q 1, 12 VV -.2, �-r -Z�115 1041 Harbor Lake Drive . Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Licensed, Banded, Insured • License 9 C -7853 Office: (727) 712 -3909 • Fax (727) 736 -8703 ,;�� i Marine C017StrUCtI017 /roc. U-)'0 -`-- /,0 }eta I � �- �- 1/0 --J, 18 5(0 Z _. Ink. 19,33 `�Crie4 avl i n+ Dr 1041 Harbor Lake Drive • Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Licensed, Banded, Insured • License # C -7863 Office: (727) 712 -3909 • Fax (727) 7368703 � � ,T `c� ., � �� CTe J rai�fe View i";"- U N LY) j k TOTAL SQUARE FEF-7 NEW SQUARE FEET WATERWAY WIDTH 'YATERFRONT WIDTH Plan Vitw (hPP1 iCant Bnd 4di Uzlit d"ks) VeoeA�an D, eoe� L , ZkV51 ITA I boa* V. hiltY A roval Water n SHORELINE rioVRI n Nzyl atioti A V,