FLD2006-08048FLD2006-08048
19080 US HWY 19
TRUCK DEPOT
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727 -562 -4567
Fax: 727-662-4865
❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
CASE #: / �D oZ 966 - CIM %
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUI RED (APPUCATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/28/2006)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT—
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: 0 ate! t 6 4 W t� S 0 YI ,1
MAILING ADDRESS: 1 7 S O A/. Q r C m i r S AytP .
PHONE NUMBER: '� �7, 4 Y CJ's7 CELL NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S): L4/I I I; A� S' R A A A.
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME:
MAULING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
-7i 7 - 6 t//- S, ,C 7 FAX NUMBER: 12 7 - L/ yb
7 z 7- 01- 3- lrs_- 17 E MAIL ADDRESS: C a N,, ,► e,r�@ L ;
EL PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORM
PROJECT NAME: r u C k
STREET ADDRESS �0. 3
PARCEL NUMBER(S): !�� 1 9 _ L/--
_
PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0-2-9
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Ftao —1 for-if
ZooF-r iW AN iD
PROPOSED USE(S): M I V,:,) VSr- : rt
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: & W!
Specifically identify the request
b
(include number of units or square
footage of non4esidential use and all
requested code deviations; e.g_
�� `
reduction in required number of
o
parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
h
(Code Section 4- 202.A)
coin i PROJECT VALUATION:
9 C l ea►ri m-ptr -37A
o - I yo - /1 a a
s PARCEL SIZE (square feet):
H_r !/V TH A19I D 4t/ 100 E
f S11 D E Lod FT TH
0
$ 2 3d 60 1 00
/ZOOn C-0
r- I .
Page 1 of 8 NOV 1. 4 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
S
Conditions Associated with FLD2006 -08048
Truck Depot Addition
19080 US Highway 19 N
This is a re- submittal following the DRC review of 10/05/06. The building addition was
scaled down (920 sf to 720 sf) and moved from adding to the north side of the rear
building to joining the front and rear buildings together. All conditions of the DRC
review have been addressed as noted below by Response: and underlined.
Engineering Conditions:
1. Provide utility plan showing how building addition is to be connected to City
water and sanitary sewer.
Response: Water is already connected and will remain one meter. Sewer connection
will be added to utility plan prior to applying for building permit.
2. Pay required sewer and water impact fees. Fees are based on water meter size.
Response: Fees will be paid prior to Bldg permit.
3. Signed and sealed as-built drawings.
Response: Drawings will be provided prior to CO.
Environmental Condition:
No issues
Fire Condition:
1. Radius on North side not provided. Must be a 30' radius. Acknowledge prior to
CDB.
Response: 30' radius has been added to the site plan.
2. Hydrant shown on the plan at 240' and is south of the property, a hydrant will be
needed on the same side of the street as you enter the drive.
Response: New Fire Hydrant has been added to the Southeast side of the property.
3. Dumpster shall be a minimum of 10'away from the building.
Response: Dumpster has 13' of clearance to the nearest building..
4. The building is going to be used for vehicle service so it must adhere to NFPA
30A 2000 Edition for repair garages. Acknowledge prior to CDB.
Response: Line -X falls under NFPA 33 Chapter 12 Miscellaneous Spray Operations.
12.1 Vehicle Undercoating and Body Lining states that "Spray undercoating or spray
body lining of vehicles that is conducted in an area that has adequate natural or
mechanical ventilation shall be exempt from the provisions of this standard, if all of
the requirements of 12.1.1.1 through 12.1.1.4 are met. Line -X meets all reWj�p=nts
of 12.1.1.1 through 12.1.1.4. Data sheets will be provided. RECEIVED
NtOy 14 2006
Truck Depot DRC Responses 1 of 4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Landscape:
1. Provide a landscape plan with all required features pursuant to Section H of the
Flexible Development Application.
Response: Additional landscape features have been added to the site plan.
Land Resource Condition:
No issues
Parks and Recreations Condition:
No issues
Storm Water Condition:
No issues
New Dumpster Enclosure:
1. The dumpster enclosure needs to be constructed to City specifications.
Response: Dumpster enclosure has been revised to meet City specifications. Details
of the enclosure are on Sheet 2 of the drawings.
Traffic Engineering Condition:
1. Remove accessible route that shares and traverses along the 24'wide.drive aisle.
Response: Route has been removed.
2. Relocate the segment of accessible route from (public sidewalk to building) to the
front of the two eastern parking spaces.
Response: Access to the public sidewalk has been moved to the south side of the
easternmost parking spaces.
3. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant to City standards. (Part
C Section 100, Index No. 118 and No. 119)
Response: Stall and sign details are noted on sheet 2 of the drawings.
4. Redraw the 20'x20' sight visibility triangles from property line. There shall be no
objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria.
(City Community Dev Code, Section 3 -904)
Response: Sight triangles have been relocated and obstructions removed.
5. Add 1' length to the parallel parking spaces.
Response: Parallel parking spaces have been increased by 1 ft in length.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 14 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Truck Depot DRC Responses 2 of 4 CITY OF CLEARWATER
Zoning Condition:
1. It appears that the freestanding sign is located partially in the US 19 ROW. The
survey and sight plan show the freestanding sign as a monopole, but the
photograph provided indicates the sign has 2 poles. The sign has a 5' setback
from all property lines.
Response: The sign would only need to be moved 3 feet. The sign has been there for
20+ years so we are asking for an exception in this case..
2. Revise site plan to include all minimum setbacks (as a dashed line). The front
setback is 25', sides are 10' and rear is 20'.
Response: All set backs have been added to the site plan.
3. Revise site plan to include required interior landscape area as crosshatched area.
If none are required then add a note to the plans indicating Interior Landscape
areas not required.
Response: Site plan has been revised to indicate interior landscape not practical for
the parking space reduction needed and size of the lot.
4. All mechanical and like equipment shall be screened from adjacent properties and
street rights of ways. Show on the plans where such equipment will be located
and how it will be screened.
Response: Site plan will be revised to show design and locations of equipment
screening.
5. The Gross Floor Area (GFA) in the FAR calculation appears to be for only the
existing buildings. Provide the total GFA for the 2 buildings as proposed at 4,185
sq ft. FAR = GFA/Overall site area. Revise the calculations on the site plan.
Response: Calculations have been corrected and site plan amended.
6. Revise site data table to include the "Required" column as indicated in the Section
G of the Flexible Dev application.
Response: Site data table has been revised to indicate "Required" column.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 14 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Truck Depot DRC Responses 3 of 4
7. Parking reduction study is insufficient. Clarify. It is not understood how the
service /install areas are not of parking demand - generating purposes.
Response: Customers are not permitted in the service /install areas of the buildings.
The customer vehicles will be parked and serviced in the install area of the building,
which further reduces the parking spaces required. The rear building can
accommodate up to 3 vehicles while being serviced and the front building can
accommodate 3 vehicles as well, which increases the overall number of parking
spaces on the property.
The business has been in operation on Hercules Ave for over 3 years with only
having 6 parking places on the property, so scheduling for that amount of parking is
well understood. The average number of vehicles serviced per day for the past 3
months is 4 in an 8 hour period with a high of 8. Wholesale (Auto Dealer) vehicles
are picked up at the dealership, serviced and then returned within 2 -3 hours.
The restaurant to the south side of the property has over 70 parking spaces and will
only need 50% of the required parking between the hours of 9am to 4pm. A high
percentage of the walk in business comes from the Hess Gas Station on the north side
and they leave their vehicle parked there and walk on to the property.
8. Clarify. How do vehicles parked in the parallel spaces (turn around) exit the
property? (Section 3 -1402: With the exception of parking spaces for detached
dwellings, no off - street parking space shall be designed so that a vehicle is
required to back into a public right -of -way)
Response: Vehicles parked in the parallel spaces will turn around at the west side of
the property and exit to the east side.
9. Re- clarify. How does the reduction in side and/or rear setback result in an
improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved design and appearance
and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required.
Response: Proposed development does not result in more efficient parking but does
enhance the look of the property by not only adding more landscape area but also
bringing the landscape up to current standards of the City of Clearwater. Joining the
rear building to the front building and continuing the he fagade the entire length
improves the appearance in addition to converting one of the garage doors to a glass
door entrance.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 14 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Truck Depot DRC Responses 4 of 4
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TD.R A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
L&Mejj>; ►1,
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5)
df SUBMIT A 00PY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTINGMV�1,'EkSI11q
page 7)
r
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A)
or Provide complete responses to the sic (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain haw each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
�Be� —ae �ieYl� 'S w oYIC 540('y (k1J ' -J6,% 446,± will heuk _A
SqA c, nrwr -gyp,- as 4kt- fAtfilmF bu4 J lmy # a %a Ard5#11
u. A � e S ,1 1l�s�.t a be;, -- -W a a-�-
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
P
A 1-iA," ±ea .JeAldf Stro'e a t{s Ide f l 102A 44eps S Faft- a,�-fd -14 t
Nyr4l% , 7k e_ ar e 4.0 499- Soo !S C(40reK-r(y I(kc artTcl.oL c� —'�ar 544,
P U S 1►iWv iS f-0
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
ka Lam) • .50 h S \fir a r' AlelL/14 isJ fA e r-
i wL e r a/'1t0Ad _
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. L \
2e �fS1Ao �:it11�9� /'e�pfe`) IA,fP C
b 4�,Sid051 I'S 4c.4&eh US 9 W'.4 k a tr.r,r 14kKe It.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
-AR 1 J¢ T*10LA -V /S c ans;s¢Qht ra�f� fie eJG f,'q �Q -FigJ� biy!! ess a n ,E�
�� —� I!A& k Aces -e a s a l
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties. / r J �'�
��^ 1 b�: a w; cr ;,lyre DIN !60- rook o } -tie Q7C:S�'!
Al�wt) ro igiva :X Le Cursph :6 -r-- he 0.A:f
Ex4gv�A3 ��� �t�fl Le LIU �.' ►� re bu;
c.tcrt"u. y kas AO ar��► - Sac- Fu►�►�i �aia�`s e►..t� vS�GI �2 :r rsUei �S al��hav►b6'
late h1, rs of 6pera,6;o , aJc A —F pa -,S aKa - ere core Ito 6 g.46fy
f. pa 2of8 � r
l,�P�.�f vlor 1ew� word( �kqt W�(l �,Ef8 e PjAep. a �-�S1de a� -{ke builaa�
At
IN
10,
ORIGINAL
Truck Depot Addition
RECEIVED
NOV 14 2006
Written Submittal Requirements: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Commercial Zoning for Limited Vehicle Service: CITY OF CLEARWATER
1. Lot area and width: The single story 720 sq ft. (24'X30') addition is well within
scale of the existing buildings on the property and the properties of the immediate
vicinity.
2. Front Setback: No changes proposed and 25 ft setback requirement is met.
3. Side and Rear Setback:
a. The side setback is reduced to 5 ft to properly align the front and rear
buildings.
b. The addition creates an improved building appearance and increases the
amount of landscaped area to the rear of the addition.
4. Off - street parking: The proposed building and usage will only use a small
percentage of the area for parking demand - generating purposes. Only 31 % of the
total square footage is used for Office, Bathroom, and Showroom area, the
remaining 69% is used for service and stocking inventory.
Usage
Bldg #1
Bldg #2
Totals
Office /Showroom
952 sq ft.
240 sq ft.
1192 sq ft.
Service /Storage
1253 sq ft.
1456 sq ft.
2709 sq ft.
The parking demand for 1192 sq ft. equals 1192/1000 X 5 = 5.96 = 6 parking
spaces. There will be 6 parking spaces available including one required handicap
space.
Customers are not permitted in the service /install areas of the buildings. The
customer vehicles will be parked and serviced in the install area of the building,
which further reduces the parking spaces required. The rear building can
accommodate up to 3 vehicles while being serviced and the front building can
accommodate 3 vehicles as well, which increases the overall number of parking
spaces on the property.
The business has been in operation on Hercules Ave for over 3 years with only
having 6 parking places on the property, so scheduling for that amount of parking
is well understood. The average number of vehicles serviced per day for the past 3
months is 4 in an 8 hour period with a high of 8. Wholesale (Auto Dealer)
vehicles are picked up at the dealership, serviced and then returned within 2 -3
hours.
The restaurant to the south side of the property has over 70 parking spaces and
will only need 50% of the required parking between the hours of 9am to 4pm. A
high percentage of the walk in business comes from the Hess Gas Station on the
north side and they leave their vehicle parked there and walk on to the property.
5. Garage Doors: All garage doors are perpendicular to the only abutting street and
does not need access to a street. The addition also eliminates an existing garage
door and adds a new double glass door entry. There are landscaped areas on both
sides of the property.
6. FaVade: The building that fronts the public road is not being altered and has
existing windows and decorative overhangs on the side that fronts the public
street.
7. Vehicle Storage: The proposed use does not involve the overnight outdoor
storage of automobiles.
8. Zoning: The parcel is contiguous to Commercial Zoned parcels only.
9. Compatibility: The design of the proposed development is compatible with and
fits well with the surrounding area including gas stations, storage facilities, and
small retail businesses.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
N10V 14 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
11- 09 -'06 18;20 FROM-
0
o_
. y
`1
� r
7277896275
T -614 P001I001 F -397
i
1 1
I
ol
m
Fffl�
O
UjLU
Q
f
V LU
LU
0
C.,
o
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project CritN 142006
I/ Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE INRLL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — lain how each criteria
is achieved, in detail: PLAN�NG DEPARTMENT
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or developn'Q" a&h fp"his
zoning district
Le
s.cea S:dAr A &A S19thOlLk c +`
2. The development or redevelopment 11 be consistent with the goals and polices of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
Tkf- cP- ������n, I r 1 a! e �h�
Ak
D
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
TMe r .v_ joTn/1s� j►dt —A 0— a� cx�_s ty
!.a - 7 1 : /
e 1117'
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
e i ' 1J bt cin QN� /
Jrcae, 11 J, Iasral�c
5. The proposed use shall oth6hvise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
0 tectives:
a The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor,
The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use.
lie te ; (s U: k 1 Se l4 e -
4 As
l nio-r 3 ya r f :t* 4kr- C,',6v al
6. Flexibility regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off -street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectives:
it The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
(� In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
Variety in materials, colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building stepbaccs; and
V Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
42"J d:,t: 'o,Kt tJ a t ro r. f
r d �-�+1 : �; n a to! n.�' (J �` ' ►fig
F'aaz'
aS a 1;�tr►,.�frn� a @w 6- 4t door w:{6. e. new I owbLe. tats Jeor Qr�f�sncQ.
t� Page 3 of 8
E STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL
Manual and 4- 202.A.21)
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. A I applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
Vif a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
• At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
• Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
• Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all strictures;
• All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
❑ Proposed stomiwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
• Proposed stormwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
• Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
!� ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stonnwater plan as noted above is included
C Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided. r
S+6tP1- %* r a f CA ^114 Pc � �ot7 /� aP0.►�
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A)
tV SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) —One original and 14 copies;
IV TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4° or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing frees; �A (p,� �� 6 S� 'Vah
Q TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
such trees; S 1 tE PL AM
t9' / LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
U/ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Cbordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
Ifi4 GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
JgAr PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
ALA- COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
qV 14 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Page 4 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A)
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36'):
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
_✓ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
y/ All required setbacks;
✓ All existing and proposed points of access;
_✓ All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
sel Location of all street rights -of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
✓ and water lines;
_V/ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
✓ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
{per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701);
Location of all landscape material;
✓ Location of all onsite and offsite stomwwater management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
d SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
EXISTING
REQUIRED PROPOSED
Land area in square feet and acres;
_✓
✓Number of EXISTING dwelling
units; q O
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
A A- A/
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
1/ number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
_V easement;
Building and structure heights;
T permeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11);
!9 A FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
_ One -foot contours or spot elevations on site;
— Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
ORIGINAL
All open space areas;
RECEIVED
_ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
NOV 14 2006
— Streets and drives (dimensioned);
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Budding and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
—
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Structural overhangs;
Page 5 of 8
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A)
W'
LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36'): SL E $ TE Ptah
./ All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
_✓ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
_✓ Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
_I/ tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
✓ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
%Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backtilling, mulching and
✓ protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
✓ percentage covered;
7 Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
YIrrigation notes.
4 REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11);
NAr COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23)
V/ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information;
41 sides of all buildings;
: / imensioned;
Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations);
Materials;
./ Sight visibility triangles;
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8 % X 11.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3 -1806)
W All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
(9/ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
YAComprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
INk Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
Page 6 of 8 K11-9V 14 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) NOV 14
v Include if PLANNING D)
required by the Traffic Operations Manager or designee or if the proposed development: CITY OF CLE
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a ° Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Departments Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 562 -4750)
Refer to Section 4801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and postdevelopment levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
e_ j j1r Traffic Impact Study is not required. !lv 8 pa [ ZEQUIREMENT �'CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If afire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
Acknowledgement of fire flow calculationslwater study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow CalculationslWater Study is included.
G _ Fire Flow Calculations /Water Study is not required. Pit r B pQ �, A r th 114/d6
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUSI BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize C*V representatives to visit and
photograph the pyy caibed in this application.
Signature of propfljr owner or representative
• F.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Swo to rlsubscribed before me this A day of
A 6 r� A.D. 20 to me an r b
who is personally kn as
produced F r' i NJ° t
as identification. ��
notarypuDirc, 0C,4 21�
My commission expires:
yi ` VB`'sNotary Puuii- !, )rida
Page 7 of 8 , ,, .; ; 2008
camissic" ,5129
Bonded By - itaryAasn.
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names:
2. That p am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to vi ' and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That (I ), the igne here fythat the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner Property Owner
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before Lme the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of t he State of Florida, on this
personally appeared wIWim rNv7�'i
J1 day of
who having been first duly swom
s s a el a II a contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
TRACY CoM wA tart
• • .,1: Nolory PU NC - am Of FIM,
80KOdI21.21XIII
a = CWW*6lon * W 365129
I On vA Notary. Public Signature
Notary Seal /Stamp My Commission Expires: ael 7— t -z en
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
N'0V 14 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Page 8 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER
Ilh: 2006039501 BK: 14907 PG: 1446, r 1/2006 at 07:11 PM, RECORDING 1 PAGES
$10.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $3115. IAN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS
COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC1
Prepared by:
James Farr, Esquire
Tri-County Title Insurance Agency, Inc.
8660 College Pkwy.. Suite 200
Fort Myers, Florida 33919
File Number. 05WIS478
General Warranty Deed
Made this January 12,206 ,'Xp,.ily CAPSTAN REALTY, L-P., A FL ORMA LIMITED LUBILITY CORPORATION, whose
address is: 9150 N Ccrin'O`Xkreseaay #1000, Dallas, Texas. 75206 -1815, hereinafter called the grantor, to WELLI[AM S BOOZER,
whose post office addil ts'is 630 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL. 33756, hereinafter called the grantee:
(Whcwv usbdt"'K @6e wm'grntal' snd'gnmtev, ioclode ell the parch to this iarmumeat sad the hear, legal mpmsrnIWve and ecaigat of
individuals, ,ar4l.tha sucomama and usigas of cammations)
WltnPSSetf1, that the grantor, for and in oonsidrration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) and other valuable considerations.
receipt wherEda hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys end corms unto the grantee,
all tMt ceT%fr land situate in Pinellas County. Florida, viz:
1. EXEWT A
From the Southeast comer of the Northeast 114 of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Run Notch 89 deg. 29'13"
West, along the East -Wear centerline of said Section 19, 100.00 feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of U.S.
Highway 19 for a point of beginning; thence continue North 89 deg. 2913- West along said East -West centerline 200.00 feet;
thence run North 0 deg.. 52'25; East 10.00 feet; thence run South 89 deg. 29'13; East 200.00 feu; thence rum South 0 deg.
5225; West along the said Westerly right of way of US. Highway 19, 60.00 feet to the point of beginning, lying and being
situate in Pinellas County, Florida
Parcel ID Number: 19- 29.16- 00000 - 140 -1100
Subject to taxes for the cttrrent year, limitations, covenants, restrictions and easements of record, if any.
Together with at) the tenements, heroditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining.
To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever.
And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully aeized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor
has good right and lawful authority to sell and cnnvey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend
IM same. a ,-Piim the tawfnl ctnirns of all persons WMm.eneveC And that raid Innd is free of all rncumhranre.c Pxccpr Iaxrs nrcminZ
subsequent to December 3 t, 2005.
In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed rood delivered in our presence: 4'd /J ' TIeSi�Pnfi
Pall 6r
All 11 (Seal)
CAPSTAN REALTY, L.P.
curia Neme I
Address; 8150 N Central Expressway #1000• Dallas, Texas.
75206 -1815
Wi&. fti..d N. Lk 91,4= Address:
State of Florida
County of Q�6
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1L1 day of January, 2006, by CAPSTAN REALTY, L.P., A FLORIDA
LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION, who islarc personally known to the or who has produced as identification.
IX/WNE ADAMS
W COLUAS810N EXPIRES N~ypubtfc -
AUGUST 25.2006 Print Narm: h ` _ --
y omdraon txOM: 1+145-St =c._� L
DEED Indavtdual Wam-ry Decd - L.SA on Fece
Ctmea' Choice
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 14 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
' Section 19, Twp. 29 - S, Rng. 16
�
FIari l a Power Easement
N0'52'25. "E`' -- 6:0.0' PB,F�
End of Asp.
0
0.06'
24.03
5.0 30.92'
ti Y o+ DESCRIPTION:
u 'a _
i o -° m Fran the Southeast Corner of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 19 ,
m
a c c E Q Township 29 South, Range 16 -E4st, Run N 890 29' 13 ",W, along
Ivi " E It
in o e the Fast -West centerline of said Section 19, 100.00 feet to a' ORIGINAL
, U V
point on the Westerly right of way line of U S: Highway 19 for RECEIVED
° 30.92 a point of beginning: thence continue N 89° 29' 13" W, along
24.06 said East -West centerline 200.00 feet; thence run N 0° 52' 25" E {� Q
60.00 feet; thence run S 890 29' 13" E, 200.00 feet; thence +�� 4 2006
C
I c a run S 00 52' 25" W, along he said Westerly right of way of
Q
E g y g` y PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1 O N ,o I e U.S. Highway 19, 60.00 feet to the point of beginning lying CITY OF CLEARWATER
N 10 M I a and being situated in Pinellas County, Florida.
o c
_..._.._ _._
N U
24.00'
5.0 30.98 ' N
—r 0
O
N
a
CERTIFIED TO:
V 'r
:at O
C a
W1111am S. Boozer
O m 3 N v O a0a
p0 m tD O
O
N N v
v v o o a o
ca 0� O a •
3 0 °► E LL
� o
M y u I m
Of x V N
1.65 ° o
o �( m LEGEND =
m m N Co I.R. iron roa
_
0 0
N ro J.P. iron pipe
i C.M. cone marker
5.0 23.86 31.15 0.05 pRM perm ref. point,
a i
238 1.6 °�° P plat value
M.H. OI 10.66 F Yield. value
m -
San. o Asphalt o 9'Steel P.p. Po#e'r Pole
Sign
M.H. Parking �,
I.R.found °. I.R.found 2Q.Q •qo -or less
Lom ".y SO'S2'25"W 60.0'Pa IF 5' Sidewalk -
P .9
B.
5' Sidewalk
o Drop r
o inlet
o ,
Edge- of Pavement Not valid ualess:eigned and sealed
CERTIFICATION
I hereby Certify, that this drawing Is a correct representation of the
property described above and that there are no encroachments.
That this survey meets with the minimum requirements of Chapter 21 HH 6
Florida Administration Code. ;
-� Florida Registered Surveyor No. 1928 Claus F. Fasting.
N
o+ Date TED F. FASTING _9837 Scale
ao 1 e 1 24�� 1382 Sandalwood Drive 7,?7- 7341
Dunedin Florida 34698
Carniencing at the Centerline U.S. Rte. 19
Southeast corner of
the Ne 1/4 of Section 19, 7wp. 29 -S, Rng. 16 -E
T.,... .- . -.
N CD
gg
1. �a
3�
s �e d
�
S S z
s t
113331 i�7s
i �•
L E
I
f` O $ Rya JCn: I
3g3u
P
�€
n
ft"�
MQ,TTNEw$
DESIGN WORKS
o
10. s
tz
L-ALJ
Al..A.M�a
19
of
'aa
g'N9S
o
v
XX�XX�
1
O
uau�'°Xaz22
�DDm
°cm
F
i
�gg
0
H
mo
�XX
I
f` O $ Rya JCn: I
3g3u
P
�€
n
ft"�
MQ,TTNEw$
DESIGN WORKS
o
tz
L-ALJ
of
'aa
g'N9S
o
v
XX�XX�
ti
O
uau�'°Xaz22
�DDm
°cm
F
is
�gg
0
H
mo
�XX
83 $
a z -
(s1
ft"�
MQ,TTNEw$
DESIGN WORKS
o
tz
L-ALJ
I.-
W W
� N � Q
d u3
.� Z 0
a�C Z
g�
I�
;a
A 0;0
0—
rm
:z
m
aa� ask
O
M
I>
r le
i'q j=
� 6
OI o
o�w �
6�'I
L
O
M
I>
r le
i'q j=
r r n6:;N
DESIGN WORKS
1L-A2d
N
71=
m r"
ER]
it
r r n6:;N
DESIGN WORKS
1L-A2d
r�
ORIGINAL,
RECEIVED
NOV 14 2000
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
I
:Clearwater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727.562 -4567
Fax: 727 -6624865
❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
O SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
CASE #: Fit�a.Oc� O O�
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
' 11
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUI RED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/28/2006)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT—
AL APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A)
APPLICANT NAIVE 0 0,A 116 in �em 104
MAILING ADDRESS: 1? S" O N, e t G, le s At✓e . C %e /' W fit, _'r
PHONE NUMBER 72-7- 4,11- C fS -7 CELL NUMBER 72 7
PROPERTYOWNER(S): Will.'
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: C A „h 0 n Hen S b
MAILING ADDRESS: 1% 3 n N, H e rt. u it t Av C lee c td A% �
-C
PHONE NUMBER: -717 - 6 q1_ 5 u 7 FAX NUMBER "1.7 % - 91V �
CELL NUMBER: 717- 6 4/- 3 S r1 E, MAIL ADDRESS: a h ri e h L i
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A)
PROJECT NAME: Tr µ c �( AW f ' 6In PROJECT VALUATION: 23400,0.*
STREET ADDRESS C e
PARCEL NUMBER(S): .. 1
PARCEL SIZE (acres): �, 2 -PLC r GS PARCEL SIZE (square feet): J Z 0 0
LEGAL. DESCRIPTION: s X r % Ed URI DW 106 fr Cog
2aaF D La SO 11/ 6aF
PROPOSED USES) V S : _Y A14 Ser 1 S
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: L� i ? . , t1
Specifically identify the request r L, r 1 I Q sgig- 4a (hdude number of units or square
footage of non - residential use and all u i q r e
requested code deviations; e.g. ` e A
reduction in required number of 0
paddng spaces, specific use, etc.)
ORIGINAL
Page 1 of 8 RECEIVED
OCT 3 1200
�Ile i PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Conditions Associated with FLD2006 -08048
Truck Depot Addition
19080 US Highway 19 N
This is a re- submittal following the DRC review of 10/05/06. The building addition was
scaled down (920 sf to 720 so and moved from adding to the north side of the rear
building to joining the front and rear buildings together. All conditions of the DRC
review have been addressed as noted below by Response: and underlined.
Engineering Conditions:
1. Provide utility plan showing how building addition is to be connected to City
water and sanitary sewer.
Response: Water is already connected and will remain one meter. Sewer connection
will be added to utility plan prior to apples g for building_ permit.
2. Pay required sewer and water impact fees. Fees are based on water meter size.
Response: Fees will be paid prior to Bldg permit.
3. Signed and sealed as-built drawings.
Response: Drawings will be provided prior to CO.
Environmental Condition:
No issues
Fire Condition:
1. Radius on North side not provided. Must be a 30' radius. Acknowledge prior to
CDB.
Response: 30' radius has been added to the site plan.
2. Hydrant shown on the plan at 240' and is south of the property, a hydrant will be
needed on the same side of the street as you enter the drive.
Response: New Fire Hydrant has been added to the Southeast side of the property.
3. Dumpster shall be a minimum of 10'away from the building.
Response: Dumpster has 13' of clearance to the nearest building
4. The building is going to be used for vehicle service so it must adhere to NFPA
30A 2000 Edition for repair garages. Acknowledge prior to CDB.
Response: Line -X falls under NFPA 33 Chapter 12 Miscellaneous Spray Operations.
12.1 Vehicle Undercoating_ and Body Lining states that "Spray undercoating or spy
body eg of vehicles that is conducted in an area that has adequate natural or
mechanical ventilation shall be exempt from the provisions of this standard, if all of
the requirements of 12.1.1.1 through 12.1.1.4 are met. Line -X meets all requirements
of 12.1.1.1 through 12.1.1.4. Data sheets will be provided. ORIGINAL.
RECENED
Truck Depot DRC Responses 1 of 4 OCT 3 12006
pLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Landscape:
1. Provide a landscape plan with all required features pursuant to Section H of the
Flexible Development Application.
Response: Additional landscape features have been added to the site plan
Land Resource Condition:
No issues
Parks and Recreations Condition:
No issues
Storm Water Condition:
No issues
New Dumpster Enclosure:
1. The dumpster enclosure needs to be constructed to City specifications.
Response: Dumpster enclosure has been revised to meet City specifications Details
of the enclosure are on Sheet 2 of the drawings
Traffic Engineering Condition:
1. Remove accessible route that shares and traverses along the 24'wide drive aisle.
Response: Route has been removed..
2. Relocate the segment of accessible route from (public sidewalk to building) to the
front of the two eastern parking spaces.
Response: Access to the public sidewalk has been moved to the south side of the
easternmost parking spaces.
3. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant to City standards. (Part
C Section 100, Index No. 118 and No. 119)
Response: Stall and sign details are noted on sheet 2 of the drawings
4. Redraw the 20'x20' sight visibility triangles from property line. There shall be no
objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria.
(City Community Dev Code, Section 3 -904)
Response: Sight triangles have been relocated and obstructions removed
5. Add 1' length to the parallel parking spaces.
Response: Parallel parking._ spaces have been increased by 1 ft in length
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
OCT 3 12006
Truck Depot DRC Responses 2 of 4. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Zoning Condition:
1. It appears that the freestanding sign is located partially in the US 19 ROW. The
survey and sight plan show the freestanding sign as a monopole, but the
photograph provided indicates the sign has 2 poles. The sign has a 5' setback
from all property lines.
Response: The sign would only need to be moved 3 feet. The sign has been there for
20+ years so we are asking for an exception in this case..
2. Revise site plan to include all minimum setbacks (as a dashed line). The front
setback is 25', sides are 10' and rear is 20'.
Response: All set backs have been added to the site plan.
3. Revise site plan to include required interior landscape area as crosshatched area.
If none are required then add a note to the plans indicating Interior Landscape
areas not required.
Response: Site plan has been revised to indicate interior landscape not practical for
the parking space reduction needed and size of the lot.
4. All mechanical and like equipment shall be screened from adjacent properties and
street rights of ways. Show on the plans where such equipment will be located
and how it will be screened.
Response: Site plan will be revised to show design and locations of equipment
screening.
5. The Gross Floor Area (GFA) in the FAR calculation appears to be for only the
existing buildings. Provide the total GFA for the 2 buildings as proposed at 4,185
sq ft. FAR = GFA/Overall site area. Revise the calculations on the site plan.
Response: Calculations have been corrected and site plan amended.
6. Revise site data table to include the "Required" column as indicated in the Section
G of the Flexible Dev application.
Response: Site data table has been revised to indicate "Required" column.
Truck Depot DRC Responses 3 of 4
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
OCT 3 12006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
7. Parking reduction study is insufficient. Clarify. It is not understood how the
service /install areas are not of parking demand - generating purposes.
Response: Customers are not permitted in the service /install areas of the buildings
The customer vehicles will be parked and serviced in the install area of the building,
which further reduces the parking spaces required The rear building can
accommodate up to 3 vehicles while being serviced and the front building can
accommodate 3 vehicles as well, which increases the overall number of parking
spaces on the property.
The business has been in operation on Hercules Ave for over 3 years with only
having 6 parking places on the pro e�rty so scheduling for that amount of parking is
well understood. The average number of vehicles serviced per day for the past 3
months is 4 in an 8 hour period with a high of 8 Wholesale (Auto Dealer) vehicles
are picked up at the dealership serviced and then returned within 2 -3 hours
The restaurant to the south side of the property has over 70 parking spaces and will
only need 50% of the required parking between the hours of 9am to 4pm A high
percentage of the walk in business comes from the Hess Gas Station on the north side
and they leave their vehicle parked there and walk on to the property.
8. Clarify. How do vehicles parked in the parallel spaces (turn around) exit the
property? (Section 3 -1402: With the exception of parking spaces for detached
dwellings, no off - street parking space shall be designed so that a vehicle is
required to back into a public right -of -way)
Response: Vehicles parked in the parallel spaces will turn around at the west side of
the property and exit to the east side.
9. Re- clarify. How does the reduction in side and/or rear setback result in an
improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved design and appearance
and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required.
Response: Proposed development does not result in more efficient parking but does
enhance the look of the property by not only adding more landscape area but also
bringing the landscape up to current standards of the City of Clearwater. Joining the
rear building to the front building and continuing the fapade the entire length
improves the appearance in addition to converting one of the garage doors to a glass
door entrance.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
OCT 312006
Truck Depot DRC Responses 4 of 4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ORIGINAL
RFeEPAID
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR)r A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI"
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO rf yes, attach a copy of tl@Cappli�bje Rs ents)
PLANNING UEPARImENT
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) CITY OF CLEARWATEk
SUBMIT A OJPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 7
Q
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A)
V
Provide complete responses to the son (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA— Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1.
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, buk coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which x
is located.
`` 1 /
TI►eSe� aQy�l Pn.� IS A oAe- 54ory �O alon Ak+ will half]
V r )► r t b tt Lit a We ,'f
akn,� 5 be
2.
9!5r 4-11
The proposed development wi0 not hinder or discanage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
irrgair the value thereof.
Thie dt lasel Li'ai te) Veh;rle Sertn'ce tis We[( to, "A 44e p-1 S�ajj.'j -14
—:to
era,e� 7 -�. {I, e. Soc E� ; Cuorewtt se yncgL4t 4. "L S iar- S44
ra ;15 ck r s -felm t,,n N% aL r xa S awy i
3.
The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
Z La A r D.-If&,e kautacr Au /L tk S4Xe ,.- At- h r jL SS a e s for
-t�Q /1 l7ljr, in •ire_ AQ� ePh6n�-
4.
The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
a ' Qa"fA 44 - O
L 6ks` 24
�JUS;KQ�; iS )sc�,4e)i 6A US /9 «t;-I a f��rri n! - & en-� / ♦...' -i'
5.
The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
/
/ C Olifr' Ni:fi1 e i 9NJ�� N
-1 cc loo a s a e t l 1
0
reL4fp • ; avt
6.
tq
The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties.
ex4- . bu.' d66
�►—�pr lose 1v' AAI w:fl iiyet -Je. or% 4-4e- laak of -&*_ h
r
Pais yt ��e: CurfiPh:6 c a is r. Ike ���: f.'ah 0 41 i ah-, -1� y_ i-f`an M4
to • Ul tlfi k ¢ 'e
EXfQ>1at -t t "l Ie -� Ae rve tj �u;IJ:n 'rk* tfar bw
It
C %kr-f v k"s no axch 4 cfA� be+%s'jr a,,j aj or, �n 7r6V4E enac4oy
-Tke. hb%rs o f oPer- oh are, lq -F f,. -SP aKa Aem are do
ae 2of8
,MP,u fs Aor lout work •fkat w.fC fak¢ rllace, ewfflde e� -{1►t? budWti
ORIGINAL
Truck Depot Addition RECEIVED
Written Submittal Requirements:
OCT 3 12006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Commercial Zoning for Limited Vehicle Service: CITY OF CLEARWATER
1. Lot area and width: The single story 720 sq ft. (24'X30') addition is well within
scale of the existing buildings on the property and the properties of the immediate
vicinity.
2. Front Setback: No changes proposed and 25 ft setback requirement is met.
3. Side and Rear Setback:
a. The side setback is reduced to 5 ft to .properly align the front and rear
buildings.
b. The addition creates an improved building appearance and increases the
amount of landscaped area to the rear of the addition.
4. Off - street parking: The proposed building and usage will only use a small
percentage of the area for parking demand - generating purposes. Only 31% of the
total square footage is used for Office, Bathroom, and Showroom area, the
remaining 69% is used for service and stocking inventory.
Usage
Bldg #1
Bldg #2
Totals
Office /Showroom
952 sq ft.
240 sq ft.
1192 sq ft.
Service /Storage
1253 sq ft.
1456 sq ft.
2709 sq ft.
The parking demand for 1192 sq ft. equals 1192/1000 X 5 = 5.96 = 6 parking
spaces. There will be 6 parking spaces available including one required handicap
space.
Customers are not permitted in the service /install areas of the buildings. The
customer vehicles will be parked and serviced in the install area of the building,
which further reduces the parking spaces required. The rear building can
accommodate up to 3 vehicles while being serviced and the front building can
accommodate 3 vehicles as well, which increases the overall number of parking
spaces on the property.
The business has been in operation on Hercules Ave for over 3 years with only
having 6 parking places on the property, so scheduling for that amount of parking
is well understood. The average number of vehicles serviced per day for the past 3
months is 4 in an 8 hour period with a high of 8. Wholesale (Auto Dealer)
vehicles are picked up at the dealership, serviced and then returned within 2 -3
hours.
The restaurant to the south side of the property has over 70 parking spaces and
will only need 50% of the required parking between the hours of 9am to 4pm. A
high percentage of the walk in business comes from the Hess Gas Station on the
north side and they leave their vehicle parked there and walk on to the property.
5. Garage Doors: All garage doors are perpendicular to the only abutting street and
does not need access to a street. The addition also eliminates an existing garage
door and adds a new double glass door entry. There are landscaped areas on both
sides of the property.
6. FaVade: The building that fronts the public road is not being altered and has
existing windows and decorative overhangs on the side that fronts the public
street.
7. Vehicle Storage: The proposed use does not involve the overnight outdoor
storage of automobiles.
8. Zoning: The parcel is contiguous to Commercial Zoned parcels only.
9. Compatibility: The design of the proposed development is compatible with and
fits well with the surrounding area including gas stations, storage facilities, and
small retail businesses.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
OCT 3 12006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ORIGINAL
Dcr+eniern
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) 0-" j1
Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE lNB-lLL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain hhwveach a#te(
is achieved, in detail: PLANNIN -
���t t1ttAFr
1. The development or redevelopment fs otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development stantri t' U�jforth Sri_ _�
zoning district U �.•LEAR
e e we l
s • j b c+
2. The devek~ or redevelopment vil U be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
r a r e IK
(_ n 0.V% AA4ftMb -fiVt -t ct' k Q-i_e—a',
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
Tin t
.�, f I
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
Q. i ' 0111 bl ' eps
1 6 h
so
5. The proposed use shall ottmerwise be permitted by the underlying land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially after the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
JeCFNes:
The proposed use is pemdited in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
The proposed use would be a significant economic contnbutor to the City s economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor,
The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
ke ri Ak-c ,I r L: 1 Se t c -
'e hldfAi ` Af
e e. C ' C"4v al C
6. f=lexibility regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off -street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectives:
® The proposed development will riot impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
❑ Charges in horizontal building planes;
W Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pil asters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
li Variety in materials, colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building stepbacks; and
V Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
a %,L: 'oiMd 1+t -two b ' •►1 a t C ; w ju ro a s kwill.
r e 4a`
two -A'-dtAt,1j
LENT
IER
N4a4'
as a ► ;r�l;Hw -frA� a �wR4,4. door w-{I. e. new ewbl.:. I"s dear enfr4Acty.
Page 3 of 8 Y
STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4- 202JL21)
❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stomnwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clear aW Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not quality as an exemption to this requirement.
1/lf a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt
❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shalt include the following;
• E sting topography extending 50 feet beyond all property tines;
• Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
• All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
• Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control struclre;
❑ A narrative describing the proposed stomiwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
• Proposed stomrnrater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
• Signature and seat of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to wwnoe of City Building Permit), if applicable
ACKKW&EDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stomwrater plan as noted above is included
Stomnwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shalt be provided.
6tor0t'0412r- 0'r u. A134 ptr- gob Mar-km ,
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
ff you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A)
V/ SIGNED AND SEALED SURV EY (including legal description of property) —One original and 14 copies;
It/ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by specs, size (DBH 4' or greater), and location,
including drip rum and indicating trees to be removed) —please design around due existing trees; ..) 6 h
trd TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a `certified arborist°, of all trees 8° DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of
such trees; S I YE 01-AM -
a / LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
W/ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior bo the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shalt be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
I1A GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
14 hr r PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required ( Note: Building permits will not be issued unlit evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
I VA- COPY OF RECORDED PEAT, as applicable;
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
Page 4 of 8 OCT 3 1 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CtEARWA,TER
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A)
✓ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 361:
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Ll All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
✓ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED bun#&& and structures;
All required setbacks;
✓ All existing and proposed points of access;
✓ All required sight triangles;
Identification of envmmnentaly unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
V1 Location of all street rights of-vay within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, stone and sanitary sewer fines, manholes and lift stations, gas
t/ and water lines;
_t/ All panting spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
✓ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
(per Section 3- 201(D)(n) and Index #701 };
Location of all landscape material;
✓ Location of all once and offsite stomwvater management facilities;
✓ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
d SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenitabular form:
EXISTING REQUIRED
_✓ Land area in square feet and acres;
(Number of EXISTING dwelling units; aL O
_1Z Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the ?��_
1/ number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
� easement;
7 Building and stricture heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.}, and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11);
NA FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
_ One -foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offske elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot fines and building Ines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
4041Df--
Page 5 of 8 ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
OCT 312006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARINATEq
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A)
W' LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 361: St= E SITE PIA41
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
_✓ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on -site and immediately adlacen t to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plard schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
✓ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
/Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, sod mixes, backfiffing, mulching and
V Protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
✓ percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
91h REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/ X 11);
NCOMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape
Ar Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where mnimum Code will not be met
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23)
✓ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information;
AH sides of all buildings;
: dimensioned;
Colas (provide one full sized set of colored elevations);
_ Materials;
.� Sight visibility triangles;
121 REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8 % X 11.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS f Section 3 -1806)
tl AN EXISTING freestanding and attached skins; Provide photographs and dimensions ( area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
• removed or to remain.
Ill/ All PROPOSED funding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
0 Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required.
qf.k Reduced signage proposal (8 %X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
Page 6 of 8
OCT 312006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
K TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C)
0 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. .
• Wit generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• VA affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with fire (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual fist of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a `Scoping Meedrxf held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 5624750)
Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the fctlowing):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and postdevelopment levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scopirg Meeting.
e_ ik— Traffic Impact Study is not required. I'v 8 �Q ( e e ft '11' /1 b ik 6
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE ZQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT
STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND
SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Wofics Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
Provide Fine Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 22004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
ru Acknowledgement of fire flow calaflationsMrater study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow CalculationslWater Study is included.
G t_ Fire Flow CalculationslWater study is not required. r�
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE RE UIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
if you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
Signature of property owner or representative
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Swom to and subscribed before me this day of
.A.D. 20 to me and/or by
. who is personally known has
as identification.
Notary public,
My commission expires:
ORIGINAL
Page 7 of 8 RECEIVED
OCT 3 12006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names:
W i 1 1 l a-m- S. ✓ 0.0
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
1010 Q S un, 1 `) C
3. That t``hi`s property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) %
A U1t+...,. � —7% ei S�. -f'. iAiw 4RQ Z,a/l'f A .&)I 6IL /111Ao
k
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
�sA A on 66.d.44
as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner Property Owner
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duty commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
personally appeared
Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Seal/Starnp
who having been first duty sworn
Notary Public Signature
My Commission Expires:
Page 8 of 8
ORIGINAL.
RECEIVED
OCT 312006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
24: 2006039501 BK: 14907 PG: 1446, 02/07 '06 at 07:11 PM, RECORDING 1 PAGES
$10.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $3115.00 BURL, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS
.COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC1
(
Prepared by:
James Parr, Esquire
Tri-County Title Insurance Agency, Inc.
8660 College Pkwy., Suite 200 '
Fort Myers. Florida 33919
File Number. 05FM15478
i
General Warranty Deed
Made this January ' 6 A p „Fly CAPSTAN REALTY, L, °., A FLORIDA L1MrrED LLIBJLITY CORPORATION, whose
address is: d 150 N CattrytR,x'l .sway #1000, Dallas, Texas. 75206 -1815. hereinafter called the grantor, to WILLIAM S BOOZER,
whose post office addles is: 630 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL. 33756, hereinafter called the grantee:
(When— uttal ipti ttie term'grantat and'graaroe” iadode ell the paetia to This insvuenew and the h6u, legal repmuntuiw and usigar of
individtuls, ,.{td . [ha suaasara and wigns t><carpaations)
i
Witntsetfi, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) andother valuable considerations.
receipt wh '°p hereby aclrnmv[edged, hereby grantx, bargains. sells, aliens, rtmisec, releases, conveys and conrirmr. unto the grantee,
all that ceTtlibrland situate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz:
Ekbrr A
From the Southeast corner of the Northeast 114 of Section 19, Townsbip 29 South, Range 16 East, Run Notch 89 deg. 29'13"
West. along the Fast -West centerline of said Section 19, 100.00 feet to a point on the Westerly right of way line of U.S.
Highway 19 for a point of beginning; thence continue North 89 deg. 29'13- West along said East -West centerline 200.00 feet;
thence run North 0 deg.. 5275; Laa 60.00 feet, thence run South 89 deg, 29'13; East 200.00 feet; thence rum South 0 deg.
5225; West along the said Westerly right of way of U.S. Highway 19, 60.00 feet to the point of beginning, lying and being
situate in Pinellas County, Florida
Parcel ID Number: 19- 29.16 -00000 -140 -1100
Subject to tears for the current year, limitat ions, covenants, restrictions and casements of record, if any.
Together with all the tenements, heroditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining.
To Have And to Hold, the same in fee simple forever.
And the grantor hereby covenant; with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor
has goad right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend .
IM sam .. 9�*P,nct the lowfid claims of all persons whotnsnevcr: Pnd that void land i.. free or all enctimbrantY.0 except tars arcnrin!
subsequent to December 31,2005.
In Witntgg Whereof, the said grantor has signed and scaled these pprreseru the day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and deiivered in our presence.
��� 6efet� R>1�►w-
(Seat)
CAPSTAN REALTY, L.P.
lbaeis N.nre Add=: 8150 NCentral Expressway #1000. Dallas, Texas.
75206 -1815
1sG -ice. Q I - -- - - - --- (Seal)
Wfb..p,j.tadName Lk ✓ &'rGs Address:
State of Florida
County of (A2j
The foregoing instrument was acknowlcdgcd before me this i.;7- day of January, 2006, by CAPSTAN REALTY, L.P., A FLORIDA
LTMITED LIAAR.ITY CORPORATION, who islarc personally known to me or who has produced
as identification.
. ._DE ANNE ADAMS ORIGINAL .... ..:....:.:...
W C.OWASSICH EXPIRES Notary Per htrr
T' 25.20N PrratName:y@ RECEIVED
My Comrtdeebn lSr<p[racaS +t�
DEED Iadlvldual Wamnry Deed - tsgalmFete OCT 3 12006
a-c", Choice -
PLANNING Ut� rr' ;,RENT
CITY OF CLEARW.k?'Lt,;
If
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria)
I /Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is
requested (use separate sheets as necessary) – Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL
Manual and 4- 202.A.21)
(City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design
❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stomwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
VIf a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
❑ Proposed stormwater detentiordretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
Iia / ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
L, Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finis ed fl
elevations shall be provided. Per (Ztvie w k Oev: n 9y gob M4l a—
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4.202.A)
C+' SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) –One original and 14 copies;
Iff/ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) – please design around the existing bees; ON 31 -/,c -/,c AAA/
at / TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and
condition of such trees;. ON S 1-rC PL Aty
(1/ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; S, YE PLAN
Cti PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards lie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved; s E NEXT Pa (i. E O F F EKE IEr T PAQKtN
�/� GRADING PLAN, as applicable; �6 �-40- h t s be +'y rn4f , EX%.)4;r Rlo� l.t.
�/ i,, GG
i(A PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording @&gfts provided);
14AC COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
SEA' 0 5 2006
Page 3 of 7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
tti'ftr
'th n,
M
FAX ND. :72756241365 Sep. 01 2006 12:39PM P2
RITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (comprehensive Inflll Redevetopmertt Project Ctrrterta)
V/ Provide e�nplM rasportses M the eight (a) CowREHENSNE **ILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA – Explain h= each criteria
is schloved. in detall-
1. The dsveloprnent Or radeveWmant is otheow lse imPWIcel without deviation from the use and(or development standards set forth in this
zoning district.
e s e qxt y_qp-I' �le �t �e vai
--
2. The development or redevelopment win be consistent with the goats a policies of the Compretmm"a Plan as well as with the general
purpose, intent and basic planning obj dhw of On Code. and with the intent and of this mNtg district
_1 re 4 �, ' (.f �- i �S'r _- 'f"d ANA.
=11Y yYV3:& g— 4 ,T S r_ c Yl t ( d1 y l 4t ✓l,e vJ _
a(
3. The development or redo wdl not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surmuindling Mpertles.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed de t.
-
5. The proposed ehaN otharwdse be pencilled by the underlying future land use cAboory, be compa ttxle with adincent land uses. will not
substantially aher the essential use charactadattcs of the end shall demonstrate oomplimtee with One or more of the following
obierUves.
(aJ The proposed use is permitted in this zoning dxsW an a mirwnu n standard. flexible standard or flexible dewslopmern use.
The proposed nua would be a slgntttcart eoonomlc cortrb" to the City's eCnnomic base by clarslfying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
The development proposel aDCormunaMees the expansion Or ►edevdoprnertt of an existing BCOnWnIC coniriibutot;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing-.
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment In an area that is Characterized by curer similar development and where a
tend u%e plant amendment and rezenirV world result In a spot Land use or zodrig designation: or
f. The proposed use provides for the devetopmov t of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
1
- —FA e - -W .e � ( --t s—L-� _ tb S�sJ� E e '� �Q - e _
v lit_ —sue uah,A sue__' /.S` cu rrAV. �,tiR,�las a/-
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width. required setbacks. height and off- street ptakiniq am Justified besed on demonstrated comp with all of
t foNnwing design objectives:
The proposed devebMW will not impede the normal and orderly development and inprovement of the surrounding properties. tot usas
perttxlttad in this zoning district;
The proposed development oorrows with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the asfabNshed or dnwV g character of an yea;
In order to form a cohesive, visually Inlerestingi and attractive appearanco, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the fopovnng d"n elemetft
Ur Changes in horizontal building tom;
U Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices. stringcoursea, pilasters. portirxxs, balconies. railings. awnings, etc.;
iv Variety in materials. oolars and textures;
D Distinctive fenestration patterns;
yf/
Building stepbw.K and
Q Distinctive mnfs forms.
The proposed development prov" for appropriate buffers. enhanced tanttsn-dpe design and appropriate distances betwoot budckVs.
lot der A. 3 er ovxgv, �rnr
.r. ^ ►��,a 1� a oak �G.n, � �- -
r"1 IP1IAI AI -
s.rannirtg DepedmentMPppc'.atlen FormsVimsiopment reviewm20 * FtumsmCornprohensive milli Project (FLD) '. RECEIVED
Page 3 of 8
SEA' 05 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names:
W t J)1'0' l S boo 2f r
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
4.
That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint*(/
Cc�n>7on tiensa✓�
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the - property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to yisi and photograph the property described In this application;
7. That (JA6), thg,�;6dqAkned_ythority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Property Owner
Property Owner
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
"d 2V f7 personally appeared fjy! /� , I F12i 04' who having been first duly sworn
e, ,and says VM0Yeti 9Wfk ��lerst s the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Public - Slate of Flo f
•�CorrrrMogB0w0ct21,211 S
CommWIoh # DID 365129
Bonded By NoBonol Notary Attcn.
Notary Public Signature
Notary Seal /Stamp My Commission Expires: QC-� ?q' �d
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
cE° 05 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
SAPlanning DepartmentWpplication Forms�development review12006 FormskRexible Development (FLD) 2006.doc
Page 7 of 7
V
n
Z €!)
OZ ��
m�
00 o
mGi
r0 C5
2r-T rl%j
CZ
09
mm —
z is Z z
\°rtA N89 °29'13 "W. 100.0 0 00. - O p
o $ w / n =.' = N89° 29'13"W 200.0 P
- • Gross
9. O 5.0�
N -w :
91..5
� . N 0
A N House No.19100
m
tA
c N °f I- Story Conc. Block'
o) °i Commercial Bulidinq
^' m 71.62
M 25.08 12.03 _
C a p 7.85 a w
O S a1'
Asphalt
to
N S o •„ p m
aa, O O • O » < -c o tT
d s o« n n `m 0D °
c • 3 -n', ace of Cone. Curb
o S89 °29'13° 200,0 P 200.2`F
Cone. Curb
e -1 m o s o y•N cn
e T a : Q al
o m
a° n
s .a Z.
°_
Sc a
o N 3 n :2
1Z
e
< 3 n e D m
A ° ' -d b C7 H H
y
V c e Z
A y 3 s y p' iq�1 �i p7 y
o Q • M F ° '. R7 M R7 'O O W F'• C•i � O
m 1 r o• � O
o m a mp~ 8° b p C n
w d m a a p o a
v ct
M e m m W o
W M a
•« o p o m mF o a tu
ta fa
dD
I . m
is
a ---
a
0 ` F Horn Boulevard 80'
` m
a
200. 2' F - 9ost
30:10 '
Conc. Slab A
o o
o
30.05
w
O
Pavement
N
44.00
I- Story
Conc. Block
Comm. Bldg
44.07'
0' M oar r�
O
o •
A �.
M
O M
br ffi
U) oo $ a i6
En
r� r (D z A z
ID
r� o o En o
�kr C
$• � N pi r p
MtNn W O pOi �c
= rl W •
9.4 Of0
A NA o
O N f
w � m
rn
m
B� o
N
m
rn 3
w o
� 6 0 y m
�o
0 O
N D 9
P
O
m
0
i
v
N
m
Rt
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Property Appraiser Home
Search @yr W;j4 @se
Apprai ct trt40me
Chang 8f AWWWpage
Forms By Parcel Numberp
Exempi 09 P4A4W ge
Homes Sales Search
How to fti8ul1diTh3kes/
Tangibl
Data a
Tax Authority List D
Links
Glossary / FAQ's P
How to Challenge Your
Appraisal Video (19 min)
Sale and other Deed
Transactions /Map Data
Evacuation Information
News and News Archives
Privacy & Security Policy
FL Law Governing
Assessments
2006 Notice of PROPOSED
PROPERTY TAX
Information
Contact Us
View "HOW TO
CHALLENGE YOUR
APPRAISAL"
A 19 minute video
(requires Real Player)
Page 1 of 1
Building Data for this Map of this Back to Query New Tax Collector Question/Comment about tK
arcel parcel Results Search Information pa>;e
Parcel Number 19/29/16/00000/140 /1100
Data Current as of September 05, 2006 [10:35 am Tuesday September 5]
Nonresidential Property Owner, Address, and Sales
FROM SE COR OF NE 1/4 TH N89DW 10OFT FOR POB TH N89DW 20OFT TH N01DE 60FT TH S891
20OFT TH SO1DW 60
* * Click here for full legal
2006 Exemptions
Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0%
Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0
2006 Value
Comparable Sales value based on
historical sales from 2004 -2005:
$0
Just/Market Value: $375,000 History
Assessed Value /Save our Homes Cap:
$375,000
Taxable Value: $375,000
Warning: A significant taxable value
increase may occur when sold. Click
here for details.
2006 Tax Information
Tax District: CW
Proposed Millage: 22.4816
Special Tax: $.00
Estimated Taxes: $8,430.60
Estimated Taxes without eQ r1z1) An
Parcel Information
Book/Page: Land Use: Auto Sales, auto rep...
14907/1446 (271
Census Tract: 254.04 Evacuation Zone: D
Mailing Address Property Address
BOOZER, WILLIAM S
630 CHESTNUT ST 19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
CLEARWATER FL 33756 -5337
Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s)
Not Platted
Sale Date Book/Page Price QIU V/I
2/2006 14907/1446 $445,000 Q I
5/2002 12009/775 $350,000 Q I
2/1999 10417/2102 $159,000 Q I
3/1985 5953/1730 $35,200 U I
Land Information
Seawall: Frontage: None View:
http: / /www.pcpao.org/ 9/5/2006
c
o1 ^� Planning Department CASE #:
C earwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY (staff initi Is):
Clearwater, Florida 33756 DATE RECEIVED: D
Telephone: 727-662-4667
Fax: 727-662-4866
❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 12 0 .�
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUI RED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICA
(Revised 03/2$/2006)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Sec ' n 4- 202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: (f q h 116 n 1"/ 4 YI S�
MAILING ADDRESS: 1-7:5'6 N. H e t* c tx 1e S AV* Cfeerwo,.4ir (5'
PHONE NUMBER: -71 77_ 6 q/ _ jr j-S- -7 CELL NUMBER: -7a 7 _ cal _ �j-S -7
PROPERTY OWNER(S): W ; U a► rvl S'• /, 6 Q e
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: C A
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER: 7-7,7-
FAX NUMBER:
E MAIL ADDRESS:
M
- 7GS
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORM ION: (Code Section 4- 202.A)
PROJECT NAME: f PROJECT VALUATION: $ Z 3 od o.0*
STREET ADDRESS 19020 As H Wy / q C L Q L�I_g
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 9- - 0000c) 1&16 - 0 6
PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0. O'Cres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 1 7_0 6 O s
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: t:r ��her a NS �y pi 9f3DW 1aoF7 Fp -r4 N� D 206FT
NOIVE 60 FT TN S 9 6a Ft T sod of o
PROPOSED USE(S/se i Z Use fA4 I otIQ S &A S ice Caw , f bN; d;
Lir►i-ltad y�kicic Se rd /cam �.r rc.P bald %Kg.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST- A Ia inn a R L O s f f e c @ N 0 0 US
Specifically identify tt f C
(include number of uuare • s ' � a: M
footage of non-residand all f� 3 L�s1J�� a At requested code dev. reduction in required f parking spaces, spe tc.)
Page I of RECE w vD
AuG 3 0 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Rut,, 25 06 11:17a HARRIS & CO. 727 797 -4722 p.l
' Iii: 2006039501 8K: 14907 PG: 1446, 02/0' 36 at 07:11 PM, RECORDING 1 PAGES
$10.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $3115.00 -r BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS
COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC1
t
Prepared by:
James Farr, Esquire -
Tri-County Title insurance Agency, Inc.
8660 College Pkwy.. State 200
Fort Myers, Florida 33919 /
File Number. 05FMIS478 `
General Warranty Deed
Made this January l2, 2006'A.D„ By CAPSTAN REALTY, L» °., A FLORMA LIMIT® LUBILITY CORPORATION, whose
address is: 8150 N CrntiyS;iressaay #1000, Dallas, Texas. 75206 -1815. hereinafter called the grantor, to WILLIAM S BOOZER.
whose post office addfrAs'iF: 630 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL. 33756, hereinafter celled the grantee:
(w'hcwv urbdiu ri d;e term -g."e and'gnsft.' iaelade all the parties to this idffiumew and the heirs, legrl mpmswtoa ves and ssrigas of
individuals,.# ibe, sucomsors and sasigns ofcarpmations)
Wltnes;kfi that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) and other valuable considerations.
receipt whe4ofls hereby acknowledged. hereby grants. bargains. sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys end confirms unto the grantee,
all that ce(thin'lanA situate in Pinellas County, Florida, viz:
Eatl�iBTf A
From the Soutfteast corner of the Northeast 114 of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Run North 89 dcg. 29'13"
West. along the East -West centerline of said Section 19, 100.00 feet to a point on the Westerly right of way line of U.S.
Highway 19 for a point of beginning; thence continue Nonh 89 deg. 2913" West along said East -West centerline 200.00 feet;
thence run North 0 deg -. 52'25: Last 60.00 feet; thence run South 89 dug. 29'13: East 200.00 feet; thence run South 0 deg.
52'25; West aloug the said Westerly right of way of U.S. Highway 19, 60.OD feet to the point of beginning, lying and being
situate in Pinellas County, Florida
Parcel ID Number: 19- 29.16 - 110000-140.1100
Subject to taxes toot the ctuTCnt year, (imitations, covenants, restrictions and casements of record, if any.
Together with all the tenements, hereditantents and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining
To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever.
And the gantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor
has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend
the same »gpinct the tawfnl clnirns of all persons whomsnevrr. snd rhat said innd it free of all eneumbranrec r-xeept taxes accnrinZ
subsequent to December 31, 2005.
In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presew the day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence:
t Imes, led Nnom
Wit —as Prin4d Nude rk 9
State of Florida
County of Qgj
i—ezvzt" #n6r
(Sea[)
CAPSTAN REALTY, L-P.
Address: 8150 N Ceotral Expressway #1000, Dallas, Texas.
75206 -1815
Address '
(Seal)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1Z day of January, 2006, by CAPSTAN REALTY, L.P., A FLORIDA
LTMrMD LIABI11TY CORPORATION, who is/arc personally known to the or who has produced as identification.
....... DtMNE ADAMS
My ComwsstON EXPIREa
AUGUST 25.2909
DEED tadlvI&W Warranry Deed - LrS31 on Face
Clo,or' Chmcc
Notary PuMe
Print Naurc:-b /✓C
MyConmdialonNxptres: a& 4 re a aDd6
RECEIVED
NuG3020
PLANNING DEPAR TMENT
CITY OF CLW\gATER
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), APR EVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
C\.� PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4202.A.5)
SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP
(see page 7)
D.
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A)
d
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1.
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which
it is located.
1
—rA¢ nr6r,oSe �Q1(et1�0� QY►-j iS o.
ir
.S ctilwfOLs -ttr ens -{fie a ;a ; b o�rj��� '' ljl
f
p rI� �A,Ik -re a-um �Q ��1e A S /� O nPw Yl�; l dry�� 4 Po yQ:►�� ���
2.
The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
n
r �I�s� L+i+l;taci �%('►?`r�e_��lica -F.�f4 urQl� 04"ik ,Eke ao,-r fo
40 r
wesf Is a
3.
The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
G4l OfQ ilk S @�
11
-41Ze u���`c. 7 I 4he hel-OkAOrk .
4.
The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
e�t;�IQ((
0. 0 s 0. �t hL&S "ness T9 e bus.y,eSs !f
loea-+!e� ;„ Ae re e r bw- A; #xb4�r4j aL,, Us /� ✓4 ar
5.
The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
�e af✓% s c --kk 4ke exlsWP%- c ; r' -- s
Q.r4v1&01 a t We 11 �s ile�`d%, r'i✓, A as
6.
The design the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
7A ,n �, 1�W.i(I )tw (A)IM of T -Oe c-dar " /ooh'( Q4 4e
Q 3 " ¢ )a es ,cam
Ae J a.or, 'TI�e knw i er re. M -):
a -#\e r e FLA o cl,[. g-r ( c! e- o wa Work `kA w i l i
Pla-, e o 4*- b .
Q Page 2of7 RECEIVED
AUG 3020
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
co OF CLEAR
as;:
S,
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria)
117 Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is
requested (use separate sheets as necessary) — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
A-HaGhit3 , Ne -Z4 17*.
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of C
Manual and 4- 202.A.21)
Drainage Design Criteria
❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stomwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
U/If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
❑ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
l� ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
�,,,� Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finis ed fl
elevations shall be provided. Per P_a v le v ] Oa s i,n y
o y 9b M.Q rq ^
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A)
C+' SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) —One original and 14 copies;
d/ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) —please design around the existing trees; O yV S 1 pC PLAN
1Y TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arbodst ", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and
condition of such trees;. 0k S /7E PLAN
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; Stye, PLAN
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved; s S E NEXT YA t;. E C F G 6*Ke li T P,49KI A16-
UA GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
TVA PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
{qAr COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; XCU VED
Page 3 of 7 AUG 3 0 2FIS
PLANNING DEPARTMENY
CITY OF CLEARWATER
A°100-6
Truck Depot Addition
Written Submittal Requirements:
Commercial Zoning for Limited Vehicle Service:
} 4. Lot area and width: The single story 920 sq ft. (20'X46') addition is well within
scale of the existing buildings on the property and the properties of the immediate
vicinity.
0 -2. Front Setback: No changes proposed and 25 ft setback requirement is met.
3. Side and Rear Setback:
- a. The side setback is reduced to 10.4' and will not hinder vehicles from
accessing the side or rear of the building.
j S b. The addition creates an improved building appearance and increases the
amount of landscaped area to the rear of the addition.
4.
Off - street parking: The proposed building and usage will only use a small
percentage of the area for parking demand- generating purposes. Only 32% of the
total square footage is used for Office, Bathroom, and Showroom area, the
remaining 68% is used for service and stocking inventory.
Usage
Bldg #1
Bldg #2
Totals
Office/Showroom
952 sq ft.
396 sq ft.
1348 sq ft.
Service /Storage
1253 sq ft.
1584 sq ft.
2837 sq ft.
fs 21
The parking demand for 1348 sq ft. equals 1348/1000 X 5 = 6.74 = 7 parking
spaces. There will be 8 parking spaces available including one required handicap
space.
��5. Garage Doors: The garage door is perpendicular to the only abutting street and is
located in the rear building on the property, so it does not need access to a street.
<gar/a The addition also eliminates 3 existing garage doors that were not perpendicular
lithe abutting street. There are landscaped areas on both sides of the property.
6. FaVade: The building that fronts the public road is not being altered and has
existing windows and decorative overhangs on the side that fronts the public
street. REGEi!/ED
7. Vehicle Storage: The proposed use does not involve the overnight outdoor AUG 3 0 2006
.� storage of automobiles. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLF.�RWATER
Q 8. Zoning: The parcel is contiguous to Commercial Zoned parcels only.
9. Compatibility: The design of the proposed development is compatible with and
fits well with the surrounding area including gas stations, storage facilities, and
small retail businesses.
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A)
K
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36 "):
V Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
All dimensions;
�
ootprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
—All required sight triangles;
d
_ entification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights- of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
_ a d water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
{per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701);
,,-'Location of all landscape material;
V--'Location of all onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities;
•Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
C,, ovation of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
V/ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabularform:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and oaae numbers of all existina utility
—1� easement;
V Building and structure heights;
7 Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
V Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/ X 11);
EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED
S,E,E 511 P[ AN
IA
A/A
$Et' PAEYtou� l7l}Gr-
SEE O4F.060S PA-&:.
SF E S fTE PLAN
Vt/afu' 3696 (rAS 3093 SANI!Agy U iB
SCE s vr45 tAW
39 E 'S 119 21-AA/
s EE std PzA!V
)V,& FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
_ One -foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas; ���e� /�®
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; G W �J
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); AUG 3 0 2006
_ Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); PLANNING DEPARTMENPI
Structural overhangs; c11Y OF cLEARWATER
Page 4 of 7
rx
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A)
LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): 5-61C
S IT c PLAN
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
elineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
tree survey);
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
_ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8%X 11);
PA COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23)
W BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information;
/AIL sides of all buildings;
imensioned;
N Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations);
_/ Materials;
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8' /z X 11.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806)
M/ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
—/ removed or to remain.
GT All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
..��//
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
PA Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
AJA Reduced signage proposal (8'/ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
RECEIVED
Page 5 of 7 AUG 3 0 2006
MANNING DEPARTMENT
Cull OF CLEARWATER
1 F
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C)
LJ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a " Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 5624750)
Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
Well Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
Traffic Impact Study is not required. Q£ t, 13 i7Q C M £ E TIN 6 0Yll6/0(D
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC
IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED
AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
Ur Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included.
<fo Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. PlEk -81PQC 17EET1n1(r O1r//b/OL, Ir I/tlt H WvKAVT
W/7N1N 3o0'
CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the property described in this application.
Signature of propertg'Wner or representaple
'010
VG
E9 �
y N `'F GO
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Swop to an subscribed before me this dJ day of
rtoW A.D. 20 C& to me and /or by
CA w who i ersonal kno as
produced
as identification'
`7_ . /)
My
Page 6 of 7
Notary Public - State of
Commisskin # OD 365129
Bonded By National NotavAn
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names:
2. That (I am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
) q0 0 U�, �4WY 19
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
4. That the undersigned (has /have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
CAnnan 14 %1-VA56A
as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to vi_it and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That e), th " d ned a thority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
PjW
per)y Owner Property Owner
Property Owner Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
cuP 1° o 4100 personally appeared �'j1/� �/, P„ee„ �n ,per✓- who having been first duly swom
;1;4nd says VACrfeGMfftTWerstaAds the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed.
Notary Public - State of Flodda
1MVC0nv ftm180w0cf21,2t)O6
Commission # M 365129
Bonded By National Notary Assn
Notary Seal /Stamp
Notary Public Signature
My Commission Expires: oc'�
AUG 3 0 2066
SAPlanning DepartmentlApplicalion Forms \development review12006 Forms \Flexible Development NW93EPARTMENT
Page 7 of 7 OF CLEARWATER
� o�S
FLD2006 -08048
19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
Date Received: 08/30/2006
TRUCK DEPOT
ZONING DISTRICT: C
LAND USE: CG
ATLAS PAGE: 309B
PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED
CLWCoverSheet
8/30/2006
Receipt #: 1200600000000008862 11:39:18AM
-p �= Date: 08/30/2006
r
Line Items:
Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid
FLD2006 -08048 04 Flexible Commercial 010 - 341262 1,205.00
Line Item Total: $1,205.00
Payments:
Method Payer. Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid
Check WILLIAM S BOOZER eca 4920
In Person
1,205.00
Payment Total: $1,205.00
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT.
This is a receipt for an application for a permit.
This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application.
cReceipt.rpt
Page 1 of 1
• Nationwide Lifetime Warranty
• Over 2 million in service
www. Li nexTampal3ay. com
LINE.X of Tampa Bay
Cannon Henson
Cell: (727) 641 -5557
(727) 446 -7777
CITY OF C LEARWATE R
?
n : ^L►�d
r' PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE. Box 4748, C1.1-ARWATFR, FLORIDA 33758 -4748
° ee+010 MUNICIPAL, SERVICFS BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVF,NUF, CLEARWATFR, FLORIDA 33756
TFLFPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT RFVIFW
December 20, 2006
Mr. Cannon Henson
Line -X of Tampa Bay
1750 North Hercules Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33765
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2006 -08048 — 19080 U.S. Highway 19 North
Dear Mr. Henson:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development
Code. On December 19, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for Flexible
Development approval to allow a Limited Vehicle Service use in addition to an existing Retail Sales and
Service use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the minimum number of parking spaces from 20
spaces to seven spaces; a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to five feet (to pavement); and a
reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to match the existing building), as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 704.C. The Community Development Board (CDB)
DENIED the application with the following bases:
Bases for Denial:
1. The development proposal is not consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2 -704 of the
Community Development Code;
2. The development proposal is not consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2 -704.0 and 2 -704.E
of the Community Development Code; and
3. The development proposal is not consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per
Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code.
An appeal of a Level Two denial (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the
applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of this Development Order. The
filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of
the case.
Pursuant to Section 1 -104B. providing that no building, structure, water or land shall be used or occupied and
no building, structure or land shall be developed except in accordance with the zoning district regulations, all
applicable regulations, and all development approvals.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner II,.at 727 -562 -4547.
Very truly yours,
Mic ael Delk, P
Planning Director
FRANK IIIBBAIM, MA) OR
101IN DORAN, Ccn NC ILNIFNusRl; I Icn-r 1 uN, Ccx Nc 1I.>11:m1 1\'
131I.I. JoNscm, Coum,1L .\1h:mlwiS Cm,,u;N A. Pi: rr•.RSr:N, Ccx:ncu.w;> iwi:,
"EQUAL EMPI.MiNIFNT ALAI) AFFIR;MATIVI{ AcrION EmITO, I:K"
[err
e�
�`��►�
C C
ITYOF LEARWATER
t�
a
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE: BOX 4740, CLEARWATER, F1.oPJDA 33758 -4748
�prf7adAII)
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRl7J; AVFNUF, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
December 20, 2006
Mr. Cannon Henson
Line -X of Tampa Bay
1750 North Hercules Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33765
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2006 -08048 — 19080 U.S. Highway 19 North
Dear Mr. Henson:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development
Code. On December 19, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for Flexible
Development approval to allow a Limited Vehicle Service use in addition to an existing Retail Sales and
Service use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the minimum number of parking spaces from 20
spaces to seven spaces; a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to five feet (to pavement); and a
reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to match the existing building), as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 704.C. The Community Development Board (CDB)
DENIED the application with the following bases:
Bases for Denial:
1. The development proposal is not consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2 -704 of the
Community Development Code;
2. The development proposal is not consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2 -704.0 and 2 -704.E
of the Community Development Code; and
3.. The development proposal is not consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per
Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code.
An appeal of a Level Two denial (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the
applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of this Development Order. The
filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of
the case.
Pursuant to Section 1 -104B. providing that no building, structure, water or land shall be used or occupied and
no building, structure or land shall be developed except in accordance with the zoning district regulations, all
applicable regulations, and all development approvals.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner H, at 727 -562 -4547.
Very truly yours,
Mic ael Delk, l?
Planning Director
FRANK 1111MARU, MAYOR
JouN DoR:\N, lion I kmluoN, CouNcn.w:.%mrR
Biu.JON.um, COUNCILME:N'1151T Cmu:n A. Pis rrRSi;N, Cot:Ncii.%n::m m:i,,
'T'Q1JAI, EMPLOYMENT AND Ari nil,MATiw Ac,rtoN I?au)LO -ER'
LONG RANGr PLANNING
DFVF.I,OPMFNT MEVIFW
December 20, 2006
Mr. Cannon Henson
Line -X of Tampa Bay
1750 North Hercules Avenue
ITT OF C LEARWATE R
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OHIO,. Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748
MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVF,NUE, CLFARWATF,R, FLORIDA 33756
Tr1,rPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865
Clearwater, FL 33765
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2006 -08048 — 19080 U.S. Highway 19 North
Dear Mr. Henson:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development
Code. On December 19, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for Flexible
Development approval to allow a Limited Vehicle Service use in addition to an existing Retail Sales and
Service use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the minimum number of parking space's from 20
spaces to seven spaces; a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to five feet (to pavement); and a
reduction to the side. (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to match the existing building), as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 704.C. The Community Development Board (CDB)
DENIED the application with the following bases:
Bases for Denial:
1. The development proposal is not consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2 -704 of the
Community Development Code;
2. The development proposal is not consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2 -704.0 and 2 -704.E
of the Community Development Code; and
3. The development proposal is not consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per
Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code.
An appeal of a Level Two denial (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the
applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of this Development Order. The
filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of
the case.
Pursuant to Section 1 -104B. providing that no building, structure, water or land shall be used or occupied and
no building, structure or land shall be developed except in accordance with the zoning district regulations, all
applicable regulations, and all development approvals.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner II, at 727 -562 -4547.
Very truly yours,
--% °gig %��
Mic ael Delk, QP
Planning Director
PRANK I IIISRARM, MAYOR
J011N D>RAN, CMN01 -MEMBER I IOrr I kmll.w..y, Co[:'ycn.w.Nn3rR
13111 J<mSON, COUNCIIAILM131T Gu;i.r.N A. lli• ri:RSEN, C01:NC 1- v1FMMPR
"I:QtIAL l:ntPLOYM ENT AND ArFrRMArivlt ACTION EMPLOYER"
off'
FLD2006w08048
19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
LINE X &TRUCK DEPOT
PLANNER OF RECORD: JVS
ATLAS # 309B
ZONING: C
LAND USE: CG
RECEIVED:
INCOMPLETE:
COMPLETE:
08/30/2006
MAPS:
PHOTOS:
STAFF REPORT:
DRC:
CDB:
CLWCoverSheet
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865
0
FAX: y46 -765(p
Phone: 6111 —S5577
FROM: Phone: 642- 4Sy-7
DATE: ! 2 1 0.0G SUBJECT: HN6-X !d5 . 19 - FI-0Zo (6-Q$O��
MESSAGE: 64AWPA), -> IS .: 641PV OF: u
1 i fT� ez1qm-.:r- p6tZ., yqo& pr4ozTee�-
commuri • i Ji rM2i
•I Am
MEAA11941 06 WILL- BE 610106 PR :Sf5h: M DnJ9_
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
Dec. 18 2006 10:16AM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94467656 Dec.18 10:10AM 05'09 SND 12 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' ##84.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1 -800 -HELP -FAX (435- 7329).
�,- �s
°fit CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COmMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings
on Tuesday, December 19, 2006, beginning at 2:00 PM, in the City Council Chambers, in City
Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the
meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property
owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the
beginning of the meeting.
1. (Cont'd from 11- 21 -06) Dorothy B. LeBlanc and Sexton Enterprises, Inc. (Housh Ghovaee,
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a
restaurant in the Commercial District with a reduction to the lot width from 100 ft to 89.77 ft (south
along Dempsey St), reductions to the front (north along Lakeview Rd) setback from 25 ft to 18.1 ft
(to existing building), from 25 ft to 14 ft (to sidewalk) and from 25 ft to 4 ft (to pavement),
reductions to the front (south along Dempsey St) from 25 ft to 1 -ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to
zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to existing
building), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), an increase to
building ht from 25 ft to 29.5 ft (to existing midpoint of the pitched roof), a reduction to the
required parking from 43 spaces to 16 spaces and a deviation to allow direct access to Lakeview
Rd, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2- 704.C, with
reductions to the perimeter landscape buffers along Lakeview Rd from 15 ft to 4 ft (to pavement),
along Dempsey St from 10 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to dumpster
enclosure) and along the east from 5 ft to 3 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the interior
landscape requirement from 10 percent to 5.5 percent and a reduction to the foundation
landscape area from 5 ft wide to zero ft wide, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under
the provisions of Sec. 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Restaurant.) at 921 Lakeview Rd., Lake
Belleview Add, Blk 1, Lots 13 -15 & part of Lot 16, & Lots 17 -21. Assigned Planner: Wayne M.
Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006 -05032
2. Tezaris & Bieber Aguisitions, LLC. (Clearwater Gardens Condo) is requesting Flexible
Development approval for 18 attached dwellings within the Downtown (D) District as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Sec. 2 -903.0 of the Community Development
Code. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (18 units)] at 601 N. Ft. Harrison Ave, Nicholson &
Sloan's Add, Lot 1 & Bidwell's Oak Wood Add, Lots 19 -20. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft,
Planner III. FLD2006 -06041
3. New Horizons Properties, LLC and Affordable Dental, LLC. (Mako Condominiums) are
requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 11 attached dwellings within the Medium
High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay
District (IENCOD) with an increase to ht from 30 ft to 46.2 ft (roof deck) with an additional 10.3 ft
for a mechanical equipment enclosure; a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 15.3
ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 15 ft to zero
ft (to pavement), reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), and a
reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project
under the provisions of Sec. 2 -4041 of the Community Development Code; and a reduction to
the perimeter landscape buffer widths along the east and west sides of the property from 10 ft to
5 ft as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Sec. 3- 1202.G of the
Community Development Code. [Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings (11 units)] at 240 & 250
Skiff Point, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5 -A, Lots 40-41. Assigned Planner: Robert G.
Tefft, Planner III. FLD2006 -07045
4. Church of Scientology Religious Trust is requesting Flexible Development approval for the
conversion of an existing dormitory to a interim office /overnight accommodations mixed -use
(112,739 sq. ft) (Phase 1) and subsequently to a permanent overnight accommodations use (251
rooms) within the Downtown (D) District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
under the provisions of Sec. 2 -903.0 of the Community Development Code; and a Transfer of
Development Rights (TDR2006- 11032) of 81 overnight accommodation units from the property
located at 652 Court St. under the provisions of Sec. 4 -1402 and 4 -1403 of the Community
Development Code. [Proposed Use: Office /Overnight Accommodations (Phase 1) and Overnight
y,;7 ccommodations (Phase st 210 S. Osceola Ave. Oak Cove A k imercial Condo Unit 1,
AKA Floors 1 & 3 —13, U111L 2, AKA Convalescent Area. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft,
Planner III. FLD2006- 04019/TDR2006 -11032
5. William S. Boozer /, Line -X of Tampa Bay is requesting Flexible Development Approval to
allow a Limited Vehicle Service use in addition to an existing Retail Sales and Service use in the
Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the minimum number of parking spaces from 20
spaces to 7 spaces; a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 5 ft (to pavement); and a
reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to match the existing building), as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Seca 2- 704.C. (Proposed Use: Limited Vehicle
Service) at 19080 US Hwy, 19 N.. Sec.19- 29 -16, M & B 14.11. Assigned Planner: 'John
Schodtler, Planner II. FLD2006 -08048
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or
objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to
appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such
hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community
Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi -
judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s /he is substantially affected.
Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross -
examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be
requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB.
An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi - judicial public
hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and
spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the
CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case
the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be
available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL
33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns
about the project and /or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan.
Michael Delk
Planning Director
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC
City Clerk
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND
LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE
ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727)
562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST.
To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go
tohttp:// cearwater .granicus.comNiewPublisher.i)hi)?view id =11 and click on "Resident
Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public
library.
Ad: 12/7/06
4 ` 1
A Y 0 ENTERPRISES INC
PO BOX 5244
TAMPA FL 33675 - 5244
FT,T)200f "048. 259
A Y 0 ENTERPRISES INC
PO BOX 5244
TAMPA FL 33675 - 5244
i1/c
ABILITIES MORNINGSIDE INC
2735 WHITNEY RD
CLEARWATER FL 33760 - 1610
AHRENS, ETHELYN E ALEXANDER, GEORGE A THE AL- QASEM, MOHAMMED H
1285 EVERGLADES AVE ALEXANDER, MARCIA F THE 10337 GOLDEN BROOK WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4915 2420 SHERWOOD LN TAMPA FL 33647 - 2930
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6551
AMBROSE, ANGELO V ANDERSON, FRANCIS L ANDERSON, LEONARD W JR
AMBROSE, SUSAN R ANDERSON, BONNIE S 710 ROBIN AVE
1830 ASPEN CT 2541 BRENTWOOD DR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 1911
HEATH OH 43056 - 1722 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5017
ANES, SAMUEL ATKINSON, JANICE E BAKER, DORTHA A
ANES, DIOSDADA 2635 PAGODA DR BAKER, JERRY R
2500 HARN BLVD # F1 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030 2645 OSAKA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5058 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1028
BAKER, JOHN THE BASSOLINO, ANTHONY THE BASSOLINO, CRESCENZO
BAKER, THELMA THE BASSOLINO, MARY D THE BASSOLINO, GAIL
7730 E ANTHONY 1210 ALAMEDA AVE 3 KRISTEN CT
BRANCH M1 49402 - 9611 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3305 WAYNE NJ 07470 - 5061
BASSOLINO, MARY D THE BASSOLINO, MARY BECIROVIC, HIDAJET
BASSOLINO, ANTHONY TRUST BASSOLINO, CRESCENZO BECIROVIC, EDINA
1210 ALAMEDA AVE 1210 ALAMEDA AVE 8232 44TH ST
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3305 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3305 PINELLAS PARK FL 33781 - 1627
BENNETT, DARRELL R BOJANOVIC, MILORAD BONILLA, JOSE 0
BENNETT, PATRICIA G BOJANOVIC, MILA 2560 HARN BLVD # 13
1311 SUMMERLIN DR 2560 HARN BLVD # 12 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5048
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2817 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5047
BORDIER, PHILIP BOSSIE, JUDITH M BOWYER, TIMOTHY R
BORDIER, LORRAINE 2636 PAGODA DR BOWYER, PATRICIA A
2635 FUJIAMI DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1029 2500 HARN BLVD # A -A1
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1020 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5050
BRAUN, CHARLES A BROADWELL, B L BROCK, MICHAEL
BRAUN, ANNA R BROADWELL, JOYCE H DUFFY, JANINE
1283 TEAHOUSE DR 1302 MORELAND DR 2566 HARN BLVD # 13
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1004 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2907 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5045
BRONSON, ABILENE W BRYANT, JACK L BURBACK, PAMELA S
WARDAN, KAY BRYANT, LELA 1 2627 FUJIAMA DR
PO BOX 125 2626 PAGODA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1020
SWEET VALLEY PA 18656 - 0125 CLEARWATER FL 33764 -
CABRAL, JAMES CAFFEE, LONNIE L CAKIC, NENAD
CABRAL, MARIA CAFFEE, GLENNA CAKIC, JADRANKA
1285 BURMA AVE 1265 DRIFTWOOD AVE 3447 MADISON ST
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5027 HOLIDAY FL 34690 - 2412
CARNARIUS, SUSAN CHIONI, ELAYNE CLARK, JOHN W THE
91 BUCHANAN WAY 2641 SUMO DR CLARK, MARIE E THE
WARMINSTER PA 18974 - 5401 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1040 2631 JAPONICA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1022
COHN, CHRISTOPHER L COOK, SPENCER B COURTNEY, DAVID A
COHN, CYNTHIA L COOK, LARA F 2524 BRENTWOOD DR
1304 MORELAND DR 1328 SUMMERLIN DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5018
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2907 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2818
CUMMINGS, PAMELA DALTON, PHYLLIS DANCHYSITYN, MICHAEL
VOHSEN, BARBARA M 2640 SUMO DR DANCHYSITYN, HUGETTE
2758 SUMMERDALE DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1039 2637 SUMO DR
CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2954 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1040
DE GRAAF, CAROLE DE SILVA, SYDNEY V DEDECKER, EDVINA J
2629 PAGODA DR DE SILVA, BETTY M 2560 HARN BLVD # 22
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030 19029 US HIGHWAY 19 N # 21 E CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5049
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 3067
DELCUETO, JULIE A DEMAREST, SALLY A DENINNO, PATRICIA
1267 CARACAS AVE 108 NINA WAY MEGURA, PAMELA
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5076 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2208 1292 EVERGLADES AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4952
DI DONATO, LEAH DWYER, MARGARET M DYS, JUSTIN A
39 2ND ISLAND RD DWYER, STEPHEN A DYS, JENNIFER
WEBSTER MA 01570 - 1730 2644 NAGANO DR # 1 1320 SUMMERLIN DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1011 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2818
EIKELBERGER, LLOYD A THE EIKELBERGER, LLOYD A ENGLISH, JOHN L
2640 FUJIAMA DR EIKELBERGER, MARGARET ENGLISH, MARGARET R
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1019 2640 FUJIAMA DR 2513 POMMEL DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1019 ST LAZARE QC 00030 -
CANADA
EVANGELIST, PHYLLIS FERBER, ORLEAN A FLORIDA POWER CORP.
1266 CARACAS AVE 1315 SUMMERLIN DR PO BOX 14042
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2817 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 4042
FLUM, ANTHONY J FOGARTY, MICHAEL E FOLEY, LILA L
FLUM, PATRICIA A 2323 SULPHUR AVE 2632 PAGODA DR
2626 FUJIAMA DR ST LOUIS MO 63139 - 2829 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1029
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1019
FREEMAN, PATRICIA K
FULTON, RODNEY
FURLONG, DUSTY C
HEITZMAN, JACK
2491 BRENTWOOD DR
1324 SUMMERLIN DR
1291 EVERGLADES AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4945
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2818
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4915
GRAND RAPIDS MI 49506 - 3530
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019
GALINSKY, JODI L
GANG, SUSAN L _
GATES, HELEN M
2560 HARN BLVD # 18
GANG, JOSEPH R
1283 S KIMONA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5049
2652 OSAKA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1024
DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 9659
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1003
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2816
GESLING, STEPHEN T
GLUSZEK, JAN
GOLDEN SHORELINE LTD PTNSH
GESLING, KATHY
GLUSZEK, BEATA
1225 DUBLIN RD
2566 HARN BLVD # 7
1276 BURMA AVE
COLUMBUS OH 43215 - 1024
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5043
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020
ST PETERSBURG FL 33710 - 7744
GRABIANOWSKI, LOUISE
GRAYDON, BRYAN A
GRENIER, GLENN L
1331 SUMMERLIN DR
2643 PAGODA DR
1275 BURMA AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2817
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019
GRIMM, GAIL GUERRERO, CESAR SR H K INV CO
1285 CARACAS AVE 229 W 105TH ST # 44 2557 NURSEY RD STE A
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5076 NEW YORK NY 10025 - 3971 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1781
H K INV CO
HALL, BEVERLY K
HANNEL, ROBERT E SR
PO BOX 4276
HALL, MARVIN N
HANNEL, BETTY
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4276
1120 BRETON SE
1289 BURMA AVE
GRAND RAPIDS MI 49506 - 3530
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019
HARDY, CRAIG G SR
HARTMAN, DAVID P
HARVEY, RANDALL W
MARTIN - HARDY, ROSEANNA M
HARTMAN, SHEILA
HARVEY, AGENES G
2956 MAPLE CT
1323 SUMMERLIN DR
1348 RANCHWOOD DR
DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 9659
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2817
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2816
HEENAN, EDWARD B
HENDRY, SCOTT
HINES, PHILIP D
HEENAN, ROCHELLE A
1273 EVERGLADES AVE
EVERLOVE, NORA J
2630 NAGANO DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4915
412 65TH ST N
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1025
ST PETERSBURG FL 33710 - 7744
HOFSTEADTER, FRANK P THE
HOPKINS, CHARLES B
HOPPER, WILLIAM R
HOFSTEADTER, PATRICIA THE
2500 HARN BLVD # E7
HOPPER, ETTA A
1224 N CHERRY BLOSSOM DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5057
2622 BUTTERFLY DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1049
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1015
HULKA, HELEN E
HYNES, KATHLEEN A
JAHREN, ADOLPH
2651 PAGODA DR
2634 FUJIAMA DR
8470 BARDMOOR PL
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1019
SEMINOLE FL 33777 - 1301
JAMES BOND JANSSEN, DONALD H THE JAPANESE GARDEN MOBIL
319 SOUTH GARDEN AVENUE 9525 BLIND PASS RD # 801 ESTATES
CLEARWATER, FL 33756 ST PETE BEACH FL 33706 - 1335 19709 US HIGHWAY 19 N
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1006
JEDREZEJOWSKA, EWA JERSEY, ANNE E THE JONES, STEVEN L
2547 BRENTWOOD DR NATION LAND TRUST JONES, REGINA W
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5017 12360 66TH ST 1290 CARACAS AVE
LARGO FL 33773 - 3434 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026
KAISER, R MARLENE KASTRENAKES, MANUEL THE KASTRENAKES, MANUEL THE
2630 FUJIAMA DR KASTRENAKES, EVANGELINE THE KASTRENAKES, EVANGELINE THE
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1019 1780 MCCAULEY RD 1780 MCCAULEY RD
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1541 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1541
KELLEY, RICHARD F KENYON DODGE INC KING, RENEE LYNN
KELLEY, JOAN M 19400 US HIGHWAY 19 N 2500 HARN BLVD # C -2
2650 NAGANO DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6016 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5064
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1011
KLAPKA, MICHAEL P KLJAJIC, HARIS KNIGHT, JAMES P
KLAPKA, SHARON L KLJAJIC, ZUMRETA 509 HARBOR DR
1305 SUMMERLIN DR 2560 HARN BLVD # 10 BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3253
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2817 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5047
KOEHLINGER, NATHAN KRIVDIC, ZIJAD KUSS, DONALD J
KOEHLINGER, MICHELLE MUSKIC, TEHVIDA KUSS, KATHLEEN M
2460 HARN BLVD 1277 DRIFTWOOD AVE 2632 FUJIAMA DE
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2921 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5027 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1019
LA BONTE, CAROLINE LA ROU, GERALD LARIOS, RAMON
2481 BRENTWOOD DR LA ROU, DOROTHY 1150 8TH AVE NE
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4945 1282 BURMA AVE LARGO FL 33770 - 1636
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020
LEE, EDWARD M THE LEONARDI, DANIEL A LESNER, SUSAN
LEE, SARAH J THE 81D EDGEWATER PARK GRUSS, VALERIE
2638 SUMO DR BRONX NY 10465 - 3518 2627 PAGODA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1039 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030
LEWIS, ELAINE LINCARE HOLDINGS INC LORENZO, CAREN
1211 N KIMONO DR 19387 US HIGHWAY 19 N CARNAZZA, VITO
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1052 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 3102 2566 HARN BLVD # 2
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5077
LOWERY, MARIE J LUTZ, WILLIAM J M N M INVESTMENTS LLC
LOWERY, PATRICIA 7422 3RD AVE 2500 HARN BLVD # A -3
2560 HARN BLVD # 17 MAYS LANDING NJ 08330 - 4150 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5012
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5048
MAHMOUD, MAHMOUD A MALLIE, DONNA L MALLIE, DONNA
2500 HARN BLVD # E -08 509 E MT VERNON ST 1217 TEAHOUSE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5057 PO BOX 302 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1044
METAMORA IL 61548 - 0302
MAMMOSER, THOMAS E MARNIE, ANGELINE MARONTO, JOHN A
2656 OSAKA DR 1275 S KIMONA DR MARONTO, ADDIE J
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1003 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1024 3003 S ATLANTIC AVE #6C5
DAYTONA BEACH SHORES FL 32118
-6168
MARTIN, JAMES E MARZHEUSER, MICHELLE L MASCIARELLI, JOHN
MARTIN, CATHERINE A 2500 HARN BLVD # F24 6501 17TH ST N
1312 SUMMERLIN DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5059 ST PETERSBURG FL 33702 - 7215
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2818
MASON, EDWARD V MAYER, JODY B MC KAY, ANDREW L
MASON, MISA B 3108 N 4TH ST 18304 GULF BLVD # A305
1272 CARACAS AVE ARLINGTON VA 22201 - 1614 REDINGTON SHORES FL 33708 -
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026 1018
MEANS, KARL MERLY, MARIA 0 MERRICK, LISA
1275 TEAHOUSE DR 2500 HARN BLVD # A4 2560 HARN BLVD # 11
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1004 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5012 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5047
MEYER, HELEN M MICHAEL, JOYCE B MILLER, CAROL
LOHKAMP, NORMA L 2560 HARN BLVD # 21 1206 N KIMONO DR
2645 PAGODA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5049 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1050
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030
MILLER, LOU A MINOTTI, SHARON A MOLDENHAUER, ALICE U
COOLEY, JIM 2625 BUTTERFLY DR 2612 BUTTERFLY DR
1284 CARACAS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1016 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1015
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026
MONTAN, VICTOR MORNINGSIDE EAST CONDO 1 MORNINGSIDE EAST CONDO 2
2566 HARN BLVD # 19 ASSN ASSN
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5044 2566 HARN BLVD 2560 HARN BLVD
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5042 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5046
MORNINGSIDE EAST INC MULLEN, EILEEN MUNGER, MICHAEL
2500 HARN BLVD 1269 BURMA AVE MUNGER, KAREN
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5050 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019 1327 SUMMERLIN DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2817
MUSTAFARAJ, ALFRED MYERS, WILLIAM J NEVERS, RHONDA L
MUSTAFARAJ, LJULJIETA ANTICOLA, RITA M 1306 MORELAND DR
1647 BAYHILL DR 909 VERCELLI ST CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2907
OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 1957 DELTONA FL 32725 - 3535
NICOL, ELIZABETH A NIEVES, FRANK NIMBLETT, LEO
59 CHARLOTTE DR NIEVES, NIDIA NIMBLETT, DORIS J
WINTER HAVEN FL 33880 - 4909 2560 HARN BLVD # 9 2652 RICE PADDY DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5047 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1033
O'DONNELL, THOMAS E PAGE, J B PECKHAM, KELLY M
O'DONNELL, SHIRLEY M PAGE, LAURA 1 2566 HARN BLVD # 15
2624 BUTTERFLY DR 2644 OSAKA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5045
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1015 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1027
PETSCHER, MENASHEN PHILLIPS, VERNON F PHIRST
PETSCHER, PHILIP PHILLIPS, DIANE R 2352 HARN BLVD
2341 INDIGO DR 2730 KO BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 3729
CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1430 LAKELAND FL 33809 - 8076
PICCIRILLO, RAFFAEL POSTON, ERVIL M POULOS, CATHERINE A
PICCIRILLO, MARIA 1278 CARACAS AVE 1279 CARACAS AVE
2500 HARN BLVD # F32 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5026 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5076
CLEARWATER FL 33764- 5061
PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE QUATTROCKI, ANTHONY J JR QUIZHPE, GEORGE A
419 E SHORE DR QUATTROCKI, JILL A 2566 HARN BLVD # 11
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 1269 EVERGLADES AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5043
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4915
REID, GEORGE D RIPLEY, CARLTON L ROBITAILLE, HILDEGARD H
REID, BARBARA A 1200 TEAHOUSE DR 1288 BURMA AVE
2548 BRENTWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1043 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5035
ROCCA, ANTHONY T RODETIS, MARY RODGIGUEZ, DAVID
23 ELIOT RD 2560 HARN BLVD # 16 520 DR MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD
BELMONT MA 02478 - 4119 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5048 NEWARK NJ 07102 -
ROGERS, ROBERT W RUSSO, FRANK SAKEMILLER, CHARLES W
ROGERS, EDWARD A 2626 SUMO DR 1276 S KIMONA DR
312 N FLORIDA AVE # 112 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1039 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1023
TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 -
SAMPAIO, AILTON A SANDVIK, ROBERT J SATMARY, JEFFREY
2566 HARN BLVD # 20 SAN DVIK, MARY M 12311 TWIN BRANCH ACRES RD
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5044 P O BOX 175 TAMPA FL 33626 - 4420
LA CRESCENT MN 55947 - 0175
SCARGLE, JOHN G JR SCHOOP, ROBERT V SCHROTH, HAROLD C SR
2300 HANNAH WAY S SCHOOP, DELL VIVACE- SCHROTH, CAROLE A
DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 9453 2634 JAPONICA DR 2636 JAPONICA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1021 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1021
SCIBETTA, VINCENT R
SECCIA, ALTA M
SHEA, DONNA J
SCIBETTA, RUTH I
MORIARITY, TOM
1319 SUMMERLIN DR
36 CORNELL AVE
1263 BURMA AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2817
BUFFALO NY 14226 - 4208
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019
SHIRAH, CHARLES S
SHUGART, FRANCES I
SIMPSON, CARMEN THE
SHIRAH, MARTHA B
2560 HARN BLVD # 5
ALVAREZ, KRISTIN
1316 SUMMERLIN DR
CLEARWATER FL. 33764 - 5071
8151 SIMPSON PL
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2818
WESLEY CHAPEL FL 33544 - 4509
SMITH, DARYL E
SMITH, DONNA E
SMITH, GEARY M
1264 BURMA AVE
3224 ELKRIDGE DR
3342 ORANGEWOOD AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020
HOLIDAY FL 34691 - 4625
LOS ALAMITOS CA 90720 - 3814
SMITH, SCOTT A SOLLAZZO, JOSEPH L JR SPRINGER, SUSAN G
2560 HARN BLVD # 19 SOLLAZZO, KRISTEN 1332 SUMMERLIN DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5049 2535 BRENTWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2818
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5017
STEWART, SHEILA STOCKSDALE, EILENE MALUCCIO STOKLOSA, GERY
STEWART, CHARLES 2120 SHORELINE DR 2560 HARN BLVD # 3
2629 NAGANO DR PISMO BEACH CA 93449 - 1823 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5071
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1026
STOLDT, WILLIAM E STRELOW, WILHELMINA STRUPP, WILLIAM C JR
STOLDT, PAMELA J 2500 HARN BLVD # A6 2376 SUNSET POINT RD
2489 BRENTWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5012 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1423
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4945
STRUPP, WILLIAM C JR SULLIVAN, BEVERLY A SUNSET PONTIAC GMC TRUCK S
2376 SUNSET POINT RD 2560 HARN BLVD # 2 INC
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1423 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5071 19320 US HWY 19 N
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 3176
SWANSON, RONALD E SZAKONYI, JULIUS J THE TARTARONE, VINCENT
13011 SW 14TH PL 2500 HARN BLVD # F -28 TARTARONE, ANNA
DAVIE FL 33325 - 5718 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5061 541 LOGAN AVE
BRONX NY 10465 - 2509
TAWSE, LINDA J TENJIDO, NEMESIO TONCHAK, VIRGINIA S
TAWSE, ARTHUR F JR TENJIDO, MARY M 2629 JAPONICA DR
5 CHESTERS ST 2529 BRENTWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1022
DANVERS MA 01923 - 2729 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5017
TREMBLAY, MARYJANE TRUEMNER, ROGER TRUST NO 1218
2633 PAGODA DR TRUEMNER, DOROTHY 13498 WALSINGHAM RD
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1030 10288 BREWSTER BLVD S LARGO FL 33774 - 3527
GRAND BEND ON NOM 1T0 00030-
CANADA
TURNER, ANTHONY TWOMLEY, WALTER VOJNIKOVIC, HASAN
TURNER, AMELIA TWOMLEY, KATHERINE E VOJNIKOVIC, ESMA
160 RIDGE RD 2523 BRENTWOOD DR 2565 BRENTWOOD DR
VALLEY COTTAGE NY 10989 - 2351 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5017 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5017
WAGNER, JACK B & DOLORES J REV
2630 JAPONICA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1021
WILLIAM S. BOOZER
C/O CANNON HENSON
1750 N. HERCULES AVE.
CLEARWATER, FL 33765
WONG, SIU P
LAM, JESSICA Y
8204 UPAVIA BLVD
VENICE FL 34292 - 5342
YACKOSKI, DEIDRE L
YACKOSKI, ROBERT
1283 BURMA AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5019
CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS
COALITION SONDRA KERR,
PRESIDENT
P.O. BOX 8204
CLEARWATER, FL 33758
WHYTE, GEORGE R
WHYTE, CATHERINE L
2627 NAGANO DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1026
WILSON, TRUE
1212 N KIMONA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 -
WILCOX, ROBERT THE
WILCOX, KATHRYN THE
1271 DRIFTWOOD AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5027
WINGFIELD, C DAVID
WINGFIELD, KATHLEEN
1050 718 BLUFF VIEW DR
LARGO FL 33770 - 1315
WOOD, ELIZABETH M
2640 NAGANO DR
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1025
YAGODA- STREIT, PATRICIA
2500 HARN BLVD # C -3
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5064
WYLIE, CHERYL L
1284 EVERGLADES AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 4952
YOUNGBLOOD, CLARENCE L
1270 BURMA AVE.
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5020
Page 1 of 2
Schodtler, John
From: Schodtler, John
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:13 AM
To: 'Cannon @LineXTampaBay.com'
Subject: RE: Turn around drawing
Ok. please have them in before 4:00 so we can process them immediately.
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Cannon, Line -X of Tampa Bay [mailto :Cannon @LineXTampaBay.com]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 9:52 AM
To: Schodtler, John
Cc: Cannon @LineXTampaBay.com
Subject: RE: Turn around drawing
John, I found the table on municode.com. I was asked to illustrate how a turn - around can be completed on
the property and I have done that. I will add a designation for the turn around area to the plan and submit
15 sets today. I am willing to present my case to the CDB as is while I pursue the cross access with Hess
in parallel.
Thanks, Cannon
Line -X of Tampa Bay
From: John.Schodtler @myClearwater.com [mailto: John .Schodtler @myClearwater.com]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 9:16 AM
To: Cannon @LineXTampaBay.com
Subject: RE: Turn around drawing
Importance: High
Cannon,
The engineering department does not support this latest turn around method.
Neil's two suggestions (1. the cross access /parking easement with Hess, or 2. a hammerhead, into a
carport in the building providing the 42 feet required to turn around (see engineering comment below)) are
still viable possibilities.
THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. NO TURNAROUND AREA IS DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS.
THE EXISTING STRUCTURE, DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPING DOES NOT
PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR VEHICLES TO TURN AROUND MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS
OF CODE SECTION 3- 1402.A. (24 -FOOT DRIVE AISLE + 18 -FOOT SPACE = 42 -FEET. REQUIRED
WHILE 31 -FEET IS AVAILABLE). DSR 11/13/06
John Schodtler
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Cannon, Line -X of Tampa Bay [mailto :Cannon @LineXTampaBay.com]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 6:49 AM
To: Schodtler, John
Cc: Cannon @LineXTampaBay.com
Subject: Turn around drawing
John, please take a look at the attached drawing for the turn around. I will try to find a fax number to
fax it to you as well in case you do not get this email. Please share this with Neil and let me know
11/16/2006
Page 2 of 2
what you think so I can get it incorporated and submit on Monday. I talked to the Store Manager at
the Hess station and they are corporate owned and he is going to talk to the next in command
today. Please call me or email an acknowledgement that you go this email so I don't have to drive
down there.
Thanks, Cannon
Did you know that Line -X is the only Spray -On Bedliner
with a Lifetime Nationwide Warranty? Come by today to
see why Line -X is #1 in Customer Satisfaction.
Ask for a FREE sample!
www. Line -X.com
727 - 446 -7777
Line -X of Tampa Bay
1750 N. Hercules Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33765
11/16/2006
Page 1 of 2
Schodtler, John
From: Cannon, Complete Design Solutions [Cannon.Henson @CDS- FL.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 11:10 AM
To: Schodtler, John
Cc: Cannon Henson, Line -X
Subject: RE: Truck Depot status
John, here are my questions to your responses:
1. What else do you need for the parking reduction? I am not sure of what else I can do. I want to talk to whoever
is saying they want more to find out what they want.
2. You told me in the DRC review meeting that I can hold off on the sign for now that you would not hold us up on
that. Has that changed too?
3. Where can I find the definition of what a turn around area? I can't design something if I don't have a
requirement to design to. The turn around is no different than the business is operating today.
I'm getting a little tired of jumping through all these hoops and doing everything that is asked of me to get shot
down each time because of someone's personal opinion. I busted my butt to get the plans to you early and now I
get feedback the day before the application is due.
I just got your 2nd email. Thanks for the extension to 11 -12 to submit, but that doesn't lessen my frustration.
Thanks, Cannon
From: John.Schodtler @myClearwater.com [ mailto:J ohn.Schodtler @myClearwater.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:41 AM
To: Cannon.Henson @CDS- FL.com
Subject: RE: Truck Depot status
1. The parking analysis does not demonstrate how the two businesses will operate with a parking reduction
of 13 parking spaces.
2. The freestanding sign is required to be brought into compliance with all aspects of the Sign Code when a
building permit is required for the redevelopment of a principal use or structure. Your request to place an
additional primary use and the additional building square footage are triggering this requirement.
3. 10/10/06 - WITH THE RELOCATION OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION, ALL NON - HANDICAP
PARKING SPACES ARE ORIENTED TOWARD THE BACK OF THE LOT. DEMONSTRATE HOW
VEHICLES WILL REVERSE DIRECTION TO EXIT THE LOT. 11/7/06 - NO RESPONSE TO THIS
COMMENT IN TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. RESPONSE NO. 8 IN ZONING INDICATES THAT VEHICLES
WILL TURN AROUND AT THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. NO TURNAROUND AREA IS
DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS. THE EXISTING STRUCTURE, DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND
PROPOSED LANDSCAPING DOES NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR VEHICLES TO TURN
AROUND WITHOUT MULTIPLE EFFORTS.
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From:. Cannon, Complete Design Solutions [mailto:Cannon.Henson @CDS- FL.com]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 3:13 PM
To: Schodtler, John
Subject: Truck Depot status
John, have you gotten all your feedback on my recent plans?
11/8/2006
Page 1 of 2
Schodtler, John
From: Schodtler, John
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 9:16 AM
To: 'Cannon @LineXTampaBay.com'
Subject: RE: Turn around drawing
Importance: High
Cannon,
The engineering department does not support this latest turn around method.
Neil's two suggestions (1. the cross access /parking easement with Hess, or 2. a hammerhead, into a carport in
the building providing the 42 feet required to turn around (see engineering comment below)) are still viable
possibilities.
THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. NO TURNAROUND AREA IS DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS. THE
EXISTING STRUCTURE, DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPING DOES NOT PROVIDE
SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR VEHICLES TO TURN AROUND MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CODE
SECTION 3- 1402.A. (24 -FOOT DRIVE AISLE + 18 -FOOT SPACE = 42 -FEET REQUIRED WHILE 31 -FEET IS
AVAILABLE). DSR 11/13/06
John Schodtler
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Cannon, Line -X of Tampa Bay [mailto :Cannon @LineXTampaBay.com]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 6:49 AM
To: Schodtler, John
Cc: Cannon @LineXTampaBay.com
Subject: Turn around drawing
John, please take a look at the attached drawing for the turn around. I will try to find a fax number to fax it
to you as well in case you do not get this email. Please share this with Neil and let me know what you think
so I can get it incorporated and submit on Monday. I talked to the Store Manager at the Hess station and
they are corporate owned and he is going to talk to the next in command today. Please call me or email an
acknowledgement that you go this email so I don't have to drive down there.
Thanks, Cannon
Did you know that Line -X is the only Spray -On Bedliner
with a Lifetime Nationwide Warranty? Come by today to
see why Line -X is #1 in Customer Satisfaction.
Ask for a FREE sample!
www.Line -X.com
727 - 446 -7777
11/16/2006
Schodtler, John
From: Schodtler, John
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 8:16 AM
To: 'Cannon @LineXTampaBay.com'
Subject: FLD case comments.
Cannon,
This could be a viable alternative to your proposal. You still need to address the rest of the comments (see attached)
generated by the Development Review Committee (DRC). There were only two major issues from Planning. 1) The
parking study 2) The method for the vehicles to exit the site. Look over all the comments, revise the plans fully and provide
written responses to the comments. Resubmit three sets to Sherry Watkins in Planning. I need this no later than
November 3 to make sure it is able to go on to the CDB next cycle. Heads up, if it is deemed acceptable to continue on to
the CDB, I will need 15 sets of everything resubmitted to Sherry Watkins by November 9 at 12 noon (no later).
John Schodtler
CaseConditions.rtf
John, How does everything look? I got a call from Bennet Elbo and he said everything is done as he asked and had no
more issues. Let me know if there is anything else you would like me to change. Do you know if there is a utility ROW at
the front of the property? Not between the sidewalk and the US 19, but between the sidewalk and the parking area. The
reason I ask is I need to put the new hydrant somewhere and I wasn't sure if I could put it in front of the Hess if it was on
the property.
Thanks, Cannon
11:30 am
Case Number: FLD2006 -0804x -- 19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
Owner(s): William S Boozer
630 Chestnut St
Clearwater, Fl 33756
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email
Applicant Cannon Henson
1750 Hercules Avenue
Clearwater, Fl 33765
TELEPHONE: 727 - 641 -5557, FAX: 727 - 446 -7656, E -MAIL: cannon @linextampabay.com
Location: 0.28 acres located on the west side of U.S. Highway 19 approximately 200 feet south of Ham Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 309B
Zoning District: C, Commercial
Request: Flexible Development Approval to permit an a building addition to allow a Limited Vehicle Service use in
conjunction with an existing Retail Sales and Service use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to
the minimum number of parking spaces from 21 to 8 spaces; a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20
feet to 10 feet (to building); and a deviation to allow the garage/bay doors to be located parallel from the
abutting street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 704.C.
Proposed Use: Vehicle service, limited
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758
P O Box 8204
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email
Presenter% J John Schodtler, Planner II
Attendees Included:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
1 . Prior to CDB:
1. Provide utility plan showing how building addition is to be connected to City water and
sanitary sewer.
U�j Prior to issuance of a building permit:
2. Pay required sewer and water impact fees. Fees are based on water meter size.
Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy:
` 3. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional
engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public
Works/Engineering to field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
No Issues
Fire:
1 . Radius on the north side not provided, must be a 30' radius. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB.
2. Hydrant shown on the plan at 240' and is south of the property a hydrant will be needed on the
same side of the street as you enter the drive.Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
3 . Dumpster shall be a minimum of 10' away from the building. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
4. This building is going to be used for vehicle service must adhere to NFPA 30A 2000 edition
for repair garages. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
Harbor Master:
No Comments
Legal:
No Comments
Land Resources:
No Issues.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 - Page 27
Landscaping:
1 . Provide a landscape plan will all required features pursuant to Section H of the Flexible
Development Application.
Parks and Recreation:
1 . No issues - addition to Building #2 - only 28% increase to project.
Stormwater:
I . No Issues.
Solid Waste:
1 . That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be constructed to City specifications.
Traffic Engineering:
1 . Remove accessible route that shares and traverses along the 24' wide drive aisle.
2. Relocate the segment of accessible route (from public sidewalk to the building) to the front of
the two eastern parking spaces.
3. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section
100, Index No. 118 and No. 119) Go to link
»»» http: / /www.myclearwater.conVgov/ depts/ pwa /engin/Production/stddet/index. asp
4. Redraw the 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles from property line. There shall be no objects in
the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria.
(City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904).
5. Add 1' to the length of all parallel parking spaces.
All of above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing.
General Note(s):
1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee
schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.).
2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Planning:
1 . It appears that the freestanding sign is located partially in the US Hwy 19 ROW. The survey and
site plan show the freestanding sign as a monopole, but the photograph provide indicates it has
two poles. This sign has a five foot setback from all property lines.
2. We would like to see as much unused asphalt lot area removed and replaced with landscaping.
At DRC we can highlight possible area where this may be possible.
3 . The two parking space along US 19 are only required to be 18 feet in depth. We would like to see
the remaining 4 feet of asphalt removed and replaced with landscaping.
4. Revise site plan to include all minimum setbacks (as a dashed line). The front setback is 25 feet,
the sides are 10 feet, and the rear setback is 20 feet.
5. Revise site plan to indicate required interior landscape area as crosshatched areas. If none are
require than add note to the plans indicating Interior Landscape areas not required.
6. All mechanical and like equiptment shall be screened from adjacent properties and street rights of
ways. Show on the plans where such equiptment will be located and how it will be screened.
7. The Gross Floor Area (GFA) in the FAR calculation appears to be for only the existing buildings.
Provide the total GFA for the two buildings as proposed at 4,185 square feet. * **
FAR = gross floor area / Overall site area. Revise the calculations on the site plan.
8. Revise site data table to include the "REQUIRED" column, as indicated in section G of the
Flexible Development application.
9. Parking Reduction Study is insufficient. Clarify. It is not understood how the service /install
areas are not of parking demand - generating purposes.
10. Clarify. How do vehicles parked in the parallel spaces (turn around) exit the property? (Section
3 -1402: With the exception of parking spaces for detached dwellings, no off - street parking space
shall be designed so that a vehicle is required to back into a public right -of -way.)
11 . Re- clarify. How the proposed addition and dumpster do not prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles
12 . Re- clarify. How does the reduction in side and/or rear setback result in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking, or improved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of
the minimum required.
13 . It is not understood how you are in compliance with Section 2- 704.E.5 that states, "Garage doors
and bays shall be located perpendicular to the abutting streets. Bays shall be screened from
adjacent property by landscaped walls or fences"
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 - Page 28
Other:
No Comments
Notes: The case is insufficient. See the above mentioned comments.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 - Page 29
Conditions Associated with FLD2006 -08048
Truck Depot Addition
19080 US Highway 19 N
Engineering Conditions:
1. Provide utility plan showing how building addition is to be connected to City
water and sanitary sewer.
Response: Water is already connected and will remain one meter. Sewer connection
will be added to utility plan.
2. Pay required sewer and water impact fees. Fees are based on water meter size.
Response: Fees will be paid prior to Bldg permit.
3. Signed and sealed as -built drawings.
Response: Drawings will be provided prior to CO.
Environmental Condition:
No issues
Fire Condition:
1. Radius on North side not provided. Must be a 30' radius. Acknowledge prior to
CDB.
Response: Radius will be added to the site plan.
2. Hydrant shown on the plan at 240' and is south of the property, a hydrant will be
needed on the same side of the street as you enter the drive. Acknowledge prior to
CDB.
Response: Does this mean that we need to add a new one? If so, who can we talk to
get that started and a cost estimate.
® t)lara 15O wa he�dr nv y,,,provide
move bui4dingse as- mt- to-be past-the 1 -50' requirement .- ckn,@wJedge -praoL
�B.
Response: Possibly removing _a parking space between the two buildings to provide a
T- Turn area.
4. Dumpster shall be a minimum of 10' away from the building. Acknowledge prior
to CDB.
Response: Possiblv moving the dumpster between the 2 buildings.
5. The building is going to be used for vehicle service so it must adhere to NFPA
30A 2000 Edition for repair garages. Acknowledge prior to CDB.
Response: Line -X falls under NFPA 33 Chapter 12 Miscellaneous Spray Operations.
12.1 Vehicle Undercoating and Body Lining states that "Spray undercoating or spray
body lining of vehicles that is conducted in an area that has adequate natural or
mechanical ventilation shall be exempt from the provisions of this standard, if all of
the requirements of 12.1.1.1 through 12.1.1.4 are met. Line -X meets all requirements
of 12.1.1.1 through 12.1.1.4. Data sheets will be provided.
r4
Landscape:
1. Provide a landscape plan with all required features pursuant to Section H of the
Flexible Development Application:
Response: Additional landscape features will be added to the site plan.
Land Resource Condition:
No issues
Parks and Recreations Condition:
No issues
Storm Water Condition:
No issues
New Dumpster Enclosure:
1. The dumpster enclosure needs to be constructed to City specifications.
Response: Dumpster enclosure will be revised to meet City specifications.
Traffic Engineering Condition:
1. Remove accessible route that shares and traverses along the 24'wide drive aisle.
Response: Route will be removed.
2. Relocate the segment of accessible route from (public sidewalk to building) to the
front of the two eastern parking spaces.
Response: Access to the public sidewalk will be moved to the south side of the
easternmost parking spaces.
3. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant to City standards. (Part
C Section 100, Index No. 118 and No. 119) Go to link
www.myclearwater.com/ og v/ depts/ engin /Production/stddet/index.asp
Response: Detail 4 of drawing S -1 provides the sign details. Stall details are noted on
the site plan.
4. Redraw the 20'x20' sight visibility triangles from property line. There shall be no
objects in the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria.
(City Community Dev Code, Section 3 -904)
Response: Sight triangles will be relocated and obstructions removed.
5. Add 1' length to the parallel parking spaces.
Response: Parallel parking spaces will be increased by lft.
All of the Traffic Engineering to be addressed prior to CDB hearing.
Zoning Condition:
1. It appears that the freestanding sign is located partially in the US 19 ROW. The
survey and sight plan show the freestanding sign as a monopole, but the
photograph provided indicates the sign has 2 poles. The sign has a 5' setback
from all property lines.
Response: Possibly move sign west enough to be 5' away from property line or move
to the rg een spaces at southeast corner of property.
t
2. We would like to see as much unused asphalt lot area removed and replaced with
landscaping. At DRC we can highlight possible areas where this may be possible.
Response: Unused asphalt areas will be removed and landscapin added.
3. The 2 parking spaces along US 19 are only required to be 18' in depth. We would
like to see the remaining 4 feet of asphalt removed and replaced with landscaping.
Response: 4 feet of landscaped area will be added to the area.
4. Revise site plan to include all minimum setbacks (as a dashed line). The front
setback is 25', sides are 10' and rear is 20'.
Response: Site plan will be revised to add the setbacks.
5. Revise site plan to include required interior landscape area as crosshatched area.
If none are required then add a note to the plans indicating Interior Landscape
areas not required.
Response: Site plan will be revised to indicate no interior landscape required.
6. All mechanical and like equipment shall be screened from adjacent properties and
street rights of ways. Show on the plans where such equipment will be located
and how it will be screened.
Response: Site plan will be revised to show design and locations of equipment
screening.
7. The Gross Floor Area (GFA) in the FAR calculation appears to be for only the
existing buildings. Provide the total GFA for the 2 buildings as proposed at 4,185
sq ft. FAR = GFA/Overall site area. Revise the calculations on the site plan.
Response: Calculations will be corrected and site plan amended.
8. Revise site data table to include the "Required" column as indicated in the Section
G of the Flexible Dev application.
Response: Site plan will be revised to indicate "Required" column.
9. Parking reduction study is insufficient. Clarify. It is not understood how the
service /install areas are not of parking demand - generating purposes.
Response: Customers are not permitted in the service /install areas of the buildings.
The customer vehicles will be parked and serviced in the install area of the building,
which further reduces the parking spaces required. The rear building . can
accommodate up to 3 vehicles while being serviced and the front building can
accommodate 3 vehicles as well, which increases the overall number of ap rking
spaces on the property.
10. Clarify. How do vehicles parked in the parallel spaces (turn around) exit the
property? (Section 3 -1402: With the exception of parking spaces for detached
dwellings, no off - street parking space shall be designed so that a vehicle is
required to back into a public right -of -way)
Response: Possible using the handicap space as a dumpster are with no parking,
parallel parking customers will use that are to turn around.
11. Re- clarify. How the proposed addition and dumpster do not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency vehicles.
Response: Misunderstanding. Didn't think that access was needed if there were no
entrances to the rear of the building Dumpster is going to be moved.
12. Re- clarify. How does the reduction in side and/or rear setback result in an
improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved design and appearance
and landscaped. areas are in excess of the minimum required.
Response: Proposed development does not result in more efficient parking but does
enhance the look of the property by not only adding more landscape area but also
brimming the landscape up to current standards of the City of Clearwater.
13. It is not understood how you are in compliance with Section 2- 704.E.5 that states,
"Garage doors and bays shall be located perpendicular to the abutting streets.
Bays shall be screened from adjacent property by walls or fences ".
Response: Misunderstanding. We thought that doors facing the street were considered
perpendicular, couldn't find a picture to define perpendicular. Does this really apply
to buildings that aren't on the street (i.e. the rear building of a property located 180'
from the street)?
October 02, 2006
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758 -4748
Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone (727) 562 -4567 Fax (727) 562 -4576
CANNON HENSON VIA FAX: 727 - 446 -7656
1750 HERCULES AVENUE
CLEARWATER, FL 33765
RE: FLS2005 -12103 LOCATED AT - 19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
Dear: CANNON HENSON
The following are comments generated at the City's Pre - Development Review Committee
(PRE -DRC) meeting regarding your case number: FLS2005 -12103 . These comments are generated
early to give you assistance in preparing responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Meeting
on:
Thursday, October 5, 2006
Please be prepared to address these comments and any others that may be generated at the DRC
meeting. Resubmittals will not be accepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to
Sherry Watkins after the DRC meeting.
If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727 -562 -4582.
Sincerely,
John Schodtler, Planner II
cc: File
DRC Pre -DRC Comments Mail Out
Conditions Associated With
FLD2006 -08048
19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562 -4773
09/19/2006 Prior to CDB: Not Met
1. Provide utility plan showing how building addition is to be connected to City water and sanitary
sewer.
Prior to issuance of a building permit:
2. Pay required sewer and water impact fees. Fees are based on water meter size.
Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy:
3. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional
engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public
Works /Engineering to field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may
be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental Condition Heather Faessle 562 -4897
09/19/2006
No Issues
Not Met
Fire Condition
James Keller 562 -4327 x3062
09/21/2006
Radius on the north side not provided, must be a 30' radius.Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB
Not Met
09/21/2006
Hydrant shown on the plan at 240' and is south of the property a hydrant will be needed on the
Not Met
same side of the street as you enter the drive.Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
09/21/2006
This building is more that 150' down the driveway, provide a T- Turn,Y -Turn or move the building
Not Met
so as not to be past the 150' requirement. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
09/21/2006
Dumpster shall be a minimum of 10' away from the building. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
Not Met
09/21/2006 This building is going to be used for vehicle service must adhere to NFPA 30A 2000 edition for Not Met
repair garages. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
Landscape John Schodtler 727 - 562 -4547
09/27/2006 Provide a landscape plan will all required features pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Not Met
Development Application.
Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727- 562 -4741
09/19/2006 No Issues. Not Met
Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562 -4818
09/19/2006 No issues - addition to Building #2 - only 28% increase to project. Not Met
Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752
09/19/2006 No Issues. Not Met
New Dumpster Enclosure
That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be constructed to City specifications. Not Met
CaseConditons
Print Date: 10/02/2006
Page 1 of 3
FLD2006 -08048
19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562 -4775
09/15/2006 Remove accessible route that shares and traverses along the 24' wide drive aisle. Not Met
2. Relocate the segment of accessible route (from public sidewalk to the building) to the front of
the two eastern parking spaces.
3. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section
100, Index No. 118 and No. 119) Go to link
» »» http: / /www.myclearwater.com /gov /depts /pwa /engin /Production /stddet/index.asp
4. Redraw the 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles from property line. There shall be no objects in the
sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria.
(City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904).
5. Add 1' to the length of all parallel parking spaces.
All of above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing.
General Note(s):
1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule
and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.).
2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727 - 562 -4547
09/02/2006
It appears that the freestanding sign is located partially in the US Hwy 19 ROW. The survey and
Not Met
site plan show the freestanding sign as a monopole, but the photograph provide indicates it has
two poles. This sign has a five foot setback from all property lines.
09/02/2006
We would like to see as much unused asphalt lot area removed and replaced with landscaping.
Not Met
At DRC we can highlight possible area where this may be possible.
09/02/2006
The two parking space along US19 are only required to be 18 feet in depth. We would like to see
Not Met
the remaining 4 feet of asphalt removed and replaced with landscaping.
09/02/2006
Revise site plan to include all minimum setbacks (as a dashed line). The front setback is 25 feet,
Not Met
the sides are 10 feet, and the rear setback is 20 feet.
09/02/2006
Revise site plan to indicate required interior landscape area as crosshatched areas. If none are
Not Met
require than add note to the plans indicating Interior Landscape areas not required.
09/02/2006
All mechanical and like equiptment shall be screened from adjacent properties and street rights of
Not Met
ways. Show on the plans where such equiptment will be located and how it will be screened.
09/02/2006
The Gross Floor Area (GFA) in the FAR calculation appears to be for only the existing buildings.
Not Met
Provide the total GFA for the two buildings as proposed at 4,185 square feet. * **
FAR = gross floor area / Overall site area. Revise the calculations on the site plan.
09/02/2006
Revise site data table to include the "REQUIRED" column, as indicated in section G of the
Not Met
Flexible Development application.
09/27/2006
Parking Reduction Study is insufficient. Clarify. It is not understood how the service /install areas
Not Met
are not of parking demand - generating purposes.
09/27/2006
Clarify. How do vehicles parked in the parallel spaces (turn around) exit the property? (Section
Not Met
3 -1402: With the exception of parking spaces for detached dwellings, no off - street parking space
shall be designed so that a vehicle is required to back into a public right -of -way.)
09/27/2006
Re- clarify. How the proposed addition and dumpster do not prevent access to the rear of any
Not Met
building by emergency vehicles
09/27/2006
Re- clarify. How does the reduction in side and /or rear setback result in an improved site plan,
Not Met
more efficient parking, or improved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess
of the minimum required.
Print Date:
CaseConditons
10/02/2006
Page 2of3
FLD2006 -08048
19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727 - 562 -4547
09/27/2006 It is not understood how you are in compliance with Section 2- 704.E.5 that states, "Garage doors Not Met
and bays shall be located perpendicular to the abutting streets. Bays shall be screened from
adjacent property by landscaped walls or fences"
Print Date: 10/02/2006
Page 3 of 3
CaseConditons
Oct. 02 2006 01:17PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94467656 iOct.02 01:15PM 01'38 SND 04 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1 -800 —HELP —FAX (435- 7329).
Conditions Associated With
FLD2006 -08048
F
19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562 -4773
09/19/2006 Prior to CDB: Not Met
1. Provide utility plan showing how building addition is to be connected to City water and sanitary
sewer.
Prior to issuance of a building permit:
2. Pay required sewer and water impact fees. Fees are based on water meter size.
Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy:
3. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional
engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public
Works /Engineering to field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may
be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental Condition Heather Faessle 562 -4897
09/19/2006 No Issues Not Met
Fire Condition James Keller 562 -4327 x3062
09/21/2006 Radius on the north side not provided, must be a 30' radius -Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB Not Met
09/21/2006 Hydrant shown on the plan at 240' and is south of the property a hydrant will be needed on the Not Met
same side of the street as you enter the drive.Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
09/21/2006 This building is more that 150' down the driveway, provide a T- Turn,Y -Turn or move the building Not Met
so as not to be past the 150' requirement. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
09/21/2006 Dumpster shall be a minimum of 10' away from the building. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Not Met
09/21/2006 This building is going to be used for vehicle service must adhere to NFPA 30A 2000 edition for Not Met
repair garages. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
Landscape John Schodtler 727 - 562 -4547
09/27/2006 Provide a landscape plan will all required features pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Not Met
Development Application.
Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727 - 562 -4741
09/19/2006 No Issues. Not Met
Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562 -4818
09/19/2006 No issues - addition to Building #2 - only 28% increase to project. Not Met
Storm Water Condition Phuong Vo 562 -4752
09/19/2006 No Issues. Not Met
New Dumpster Enclosure
That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be constructed to City specifications. Not Met
Print Date: 09/27/2006
Page 1 of 3
CaseConditons
FLD2006 -08048
19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562 -4775
09/15/2006 Remove accessible route that shares and traverses along the 24' wide drive aisle. Not Met
2. Relocate the segment of accessible route (from public sidewalk to the building) to the front of
the two eastern parking spaces.
3. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section
100, Index No. 118 and No. 119) Go to link
»»» http: / /www.myclearwater.com /gov /depts /pwa /engin /Production /stddet/index.asp
4. Redraw the 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles from property line. There shall be no objects in the
sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria.
(City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904).
5. Add 1' to the length of all parallel parking spaces. .
All of above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing.
General Note(s):
1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule
and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.).
2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727 - 562 -4547
09/02/2006 It appears that the freestanding sign is located partially in the US Hwy 19 ROW. The survey and Not Met
site plan show the freestanding sign as a monopole, but the photograph provide indicates it has
two poles. This sign has a five foot setback from all property lines.
09/02/2006 We would like to see as much unused asphalt lot area removed and replaced with landscaping. Not Met
At DRC we can highlight possible area where this may be possible.
09/02/2006 The two parking space along US19 are only required to be 18 feet in depth. We would like to see Not Met
the remaining 4 feet of asphalt removed and replaced with landscaping.
09/02/2006 Revise site plan to include all minimum setbacks (as a dashed line). The front setback is 25 feet, Not Met
the sides are 10 feet, and the rear setback is 20 feet.
09/02/2006 Revise site plan to indicate required interior landscape area as crosshatched areas. If none are Not Met
require than add note to the plans indicating Interior Landscape areas not required.
09/02/2006 All mechanical and like equiptment shall be screened from adjacent properties and street rights of Not Met
ways. Show on the plans where such equiptment will be located and how it will be screened.
09/02/2006 The Gross Floor Area (GFA) in the FAR calculation appears to be for only the existing buildings. Not Met
Provide the total GFA for the two buildings as proposed at 4,185 square feet. * **
FAR = gross floor area / Overall site area. Revise the calculations on the site plan.
09/02/2006 Revise site data table to include the "REQUIRED" column, as indicated in section G of the Not Met
Flexible Development application.
09/27/2006 Parking Reduction Study is insufficient. Clarify. It is not understood how the service /install areas Not Met
are not of parking demand - generating purposes.
09/27/2006 Clarify. How do vehicles parked in the parallel spaces (turn around) exit the property? (Section Not Met
3 -1402: With the exception of parking spaces for detached dwellings, no off - street parking space
shall be designed so that a vehicle is required to back into a public right -of -way.)
09/27/2006 Re- clarify. How the proposed addition and dumpster do not prevent access to the rear of any Not Met
building by emergency vehicles
09/27/2006 Re- clarify. How does the reduction in side and /or rear setback result in an improved site plan, Not Met
more efficient parking, or improved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess
of the minimum required.
Print Date: 09/27/2006
Page 2 of 3
CaseConditons
FLD2006 -08048
19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727 - 562 -4547
09/27/2006 It is not understood how you are in compliance with Section 2- 704.E.5 that states, "Garage doors Not Met
and bays shall be located perpendicular to the abutting streets. Bays shall be screened from
adjacent property by landscaped walls or fences"
CaseConditons
Print Date: 09/27/2006
Page 3 of 3
9:00 pm
Case Number: FLD2006 -08048 -- 19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
Owner(s): William S Boozer
630 Chestnut St
Clearwater, F133756
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email
Applicant Cannon Henson
1750 Hercules Avenue
Clearwater, F133765
TELEPHONE: 727 - 641 -5557, FAX: 727 - 446 -7656, E -MAIL: cannon @linextampabay.com
Location: 0.28 acres located on the west side of U.S. Highway 19 approximately 200 feet south of Ham Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 309B
Zoning District: C, Commercial
Request: Flexible Development Approval to permit an a building addition to allow a Limited Vehicle Service use in
conjunction with an existing Retail Sales and Service use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to
the minimum number of parking spaces from 21 to 8 spaces; a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20
feet to 10 feet (to building); and a deviation to allow the garage/bay doors to be located perpendicular from
the abutting street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 704.C.
Proposed Use: Vehicle service, limited
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758
P 0 Box 8204
TELEPHONE: No Phone; FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email
Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner II
Attendees Included:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
1 . Prior to CDB:
1. Provide utility plan showing how building addition is to be connected to City water and
^ sanitary sewer.
°*
6 A Prior to issuance of a building permit:
/� 2. Pay required sewer and water impact fees. Fees are based on water meter size.
�J (J� Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy:
3. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional
engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public
Works/Engineering to field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
1 . No Issues
Fire:
1 . Radius on the north side not provided, must be a 30' radius.Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB
Hydrant shown on the plan at 240' and is south of the property a hydrant will be needed on the
same side of the street as you enter the drive. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
This building is more that 150' down the driveway, provide a T- Turn,Y -Turn or move the
building so as not to be past the 150' requirement. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
4. Dumpster shall be a minimum of 10' away from the building. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
5 . This building is going to be used for vehicle service must adhere to NFPA 30A 2000 edition
for repair garages. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
Harbor Master:
No Comments
Legal:
No Comments
{
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 - Page 23
Land Resources:
1 No Issues.
Landscaping: ,�i
No Comments NU LA fq, 4,T e f 4g- /;",A/
Parks and Recreation:
Stormwater:
No issues - addition to Building #2 - only 28% increase to project.
No Issues.
Solid Waste:
That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be constructed to City specifications.
Tra ngineering:
1 . Remove accessible route that shares and traverses along the 24' wide drive aisle.
2. Relocate the segment of accessible route (from public sidewalk to the building) to the front of
the two eastern parking spaces.
3. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section
100, Index No. 118 and No. 119) Go to link
» » »http: / /www.myclearwater. com/gov/ depts/ pwa /engin/Production/stddet/index. asp
4. Redraw the 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles from property line. There shall be no objects in
the sight triangle over the City's acceptable vertical height criteria.
,City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904).
1' to the length of all parallel parking spaces.
All of above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing.
Planning:
Notes:
10
General Note(s):
1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee
schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.).
2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
It appears that the freestanding sign is located partially in the US Hwy 19 ROW. The survey and
site plan show the freestanding sign as a monopole, but the photograph provide indicates it has
two poles. This sign has a five foot setback from all property lines.
Provide a landscape plan will all required features pursuant to Section H of the Flexible
Development Application.
1VW1amau or requiream
We would like to see as much unused asphalt lot area removed and replaced with landscaping.
At DRC we can highlight possible area where this may be possible.
The two parking space along US 19 are only required to be 18 feet in depth. We would like to see
the remaining 4 feet of asphalt removed and replaced with landscaping.
Revise site plan to include all minimum setbacks (as a dashed line). The front setback is 25 feet,
the sides are 10 feet, and the rear setback is 20 feet.
Revise site plan to indicate required interior landscape area as crosshatched areas. If none are
require than add note to the plans indicating Interior Landscape areas not required.
All mechanical and like equiptment shall be screened from adjacent properties and street rights of
ways. Show on the plans where such equiptment will be located and how it will be screened.
The Gross Floor Area (GFA) in the FAR calculation appears to be for only the existing buildings.
Provide the total GFA for the two buildings as proposed at 4,185 square feet.
FAR = gross floor area / Overall site area. Revise the calculations on the site plan.
11 . Revise site data table to include the "REQUIRED" column, as indicated in section G of the
Flexible Development application.
Other:
No Comments
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 - Page 24
CA
5
cs,
LL
o
y Maw
U
September 05, 2006
Cannon Henson
1750 Hercules Avenue
Clearwater, Fl 33765
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576
WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM
VIA FAX: 727 - 446 -7656
RE: FLD2006 -08048 -- 19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N -- Letter of Completeness
Dear Cannon Henson:
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLD2006- 08048. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is complete.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on October
05, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown
Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one
week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your
representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have
regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the
meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4547 or
John. Schodtler @myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
John Schodtler
Planner II
Letter o/ Completeness - FLD2006 -08048 - 19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
Sep. 05 2006 03:04PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94467656 Sep.05 03:03PM 00,56 SND 01 OK
f e ` I
LL
`Clearwater
September 01, 2006
Cannon Henson
1750 Hercules Avenue
Clearwater, Fl 33765
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576
WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM
VIA FAX: 727 - 446 -7656
RE: FLD2006 -08048 -- 19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N -- Letter of Incompleteness
Dear Cannon Henson:
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLD2006- 08048. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments.
Pursuant to Section F of the Flexible Development application provide one signed and sealed
survey...
2! Due to reducing the minimum required parking to less than the 4 -5 parking spaces per 1,000
square feet of gross floor area this application will need to be processed as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project. (No additional fees, or processing time). You will need to
complete the Comprehensive Infill Criteria Sheet (attached).
+� 3. Complete item #3 of the Affidavit to Authorize Agent (page 7 of the application).
According to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, the property owner is listed as Capstan
Realty. It is unclear William Boozer's relationship with Capstan Realty. Clarify /Revise the
application and Affidavit to Authorize Agent.
:6.-,) Provide a landscape plan will all required features pursuant to Section H of the Flexible
Development Application.
Pursuant to section F of the application provide a grading plan for the entire site or an
explaination why a grading plan is not required.
Confirm the need for further detail in the Tree Inventory with the City Arborist /Inspector Rick
Albee 727 -562 -4741
Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed
incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development
review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed
complete. Please resubmit by Tuesday, September 5, 2006 (4:00pm).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4547 or
John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2006 -08048 - 19080 US HIGHWAY 19 N
^�
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria)
Ll Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria
is achieved, in detail:
1 . The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this
zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general
purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not
substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of
the following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties. for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of
the following design elements:
0 Changes in horizontal building planes;
Ll Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
• Variety in materials, colors and textures;
• Distinctive fenestration patterns;
Ll Building stepbacks; and
Ll Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings.
G:UqanningDopartmon0AppIi cation Fonna\dovoopmomreviow\20O0 Form oVCumpmhonnive|mDU Project (FLo)2000.O1.dno
Page 3of8
'= �EhdL:l I f•ll � F'EF'OF'T
Sep. 01 2006 12:39PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94467656 Sep.01 12:38PM 01'32 SND 02 OK
FLD2006 -08048
19080 US Highway 19
North
9/13/2006
Ll
FLD2006 -08048
19080 US Highway 19
North
9/13/2006
3
Subject Property
Location of pro}x sed retention
C_I
Subject Property
Location of pro jx sed buddm�, addition
Adjacent Western Propefh-
L k atiou of evstina adjacent stone n-ater retention
1
0
Adjacent Northern Property - Hess
Landscape buffer and trees appear to be m compliance
5
59-
H
Western Property Frontage — US 19
Freestanding sign does not appeu to meet five foot setback
LI
Adjacent Northern Property - Hess
Landscape buffer fer and trees appear to be m compliance
Western Property Frontage — US 19
Utilizes located m fiontage
G
Adjacent Southern Property — Egg Platter
Freestanding sign and bus stop — Landscaping
Subject Property
Front of eastern building
0
Subject Property-
Front of eastern building
Subject Property
Front of eastern building
3
0
Adjacent Southern Property — Egg Platter
Perumeter landscaping is weak ur some areas
Adjacent Southern Property — Egg Platter
Perimeter Landscaping is difficult to provide wider existing trees
•
Adjacent Southern Property — Egg Platter
Perimeter landscaping is weak m some areas
Adjacent Southern Property — Egg Platter
Perimeter landscaping is difficwdt to provide wider existing trees
Adjacent Southern Property — Egg Platter
Perimeter lauiscapmg is weak m some areas
Properties across US 19 (Six lanes)
Primaily residential and office rises across the niiijor arterial road
Imown as US Highway 19 North.
Adjacent Southern Property — Egg Platter
Perimeter fencing is inconsistent —wood, sham lu>k, plywood
Location Map
Owner. William S. Boozer Case: FLD2006 -08048
Sites: 19080 US Highway 19 North Property
Size Acres : 0.28
Atlas
Page: 309B
PINS: Parcel:
19 -29 -16 -00000 -140 -1100
S: \Planning Department \C D B \FLEX (FLD) \Incomplete \US Hwy 19 N 19080 LineX (C) - JVS \Map Request
Form.doc
S. \Planning Department \C D B \FLEX (FLD) \incomplete \US Hwy 19 N 19080 LineX (C) - JVS \Map Request
Form.doc
CG
Q
19248
IQO4
R/4G
RH19206
14M
192
v!
19135
HARN BLVD m
C
N
N N N
14 A8
RH
2
14M
RH
5
191
to
Cant
19100
MEMO N
t00 100
10o too
® ® ®
19042
�
,
at,0t
58
�s
1.25
A c (c7
RM
19034
190
VV LV7
CG
19029
e
18946
Of
avow 41,05
18940
5.15 Acp
2.86 Acp
rss
CG 32102
IV
DOG
1.7 77
A
3.21 c�c)
lasso
f891t
Future Land
Use Map
Owner. William S. Boozer
Case:
FLD2006 -08048
Sites:
19080 US Highway 19 North
Property
Size Acres :
0.28
Atlas
Page:
309B
PINS:
Parcel:
19 -29 -16 -00000 -140 -1100
S. \Planning Department \C D B \FLEX (FLD) \incomplete \US Hwy 19 N 19080 LineX (C) - JVS \Map Request
Form.doc
Owner: William S. 3oozer
Sites: 19080 US Highway 19 North
Atlas
Page: 309B
PINS: Parce:
19 -29 -16 -00000 -140 -1 00
Aerial Ell cep
Case:
Property
Size(Acr -i-s):
FLD2006 -08048
AM
S: \Pfannhg Deportr,oent',C D B \F! EX (FLD) \incomplete \US f-kvy 19 N 19L-C L'neX (C) - JVS \Map Request
Form.do c
S: \Planning Department \C D B \FLEX (FLD) \incomplete \US Hwy 19 N 19080 LineX (C) - JVS \Map Request
Form.doc
99321
19
14Aa
1
uld
-Family
19206
Office
uAs
14M
192
m
N
m
N
N
O!
J
19135
Office
HARN BLVD m
h �f,co
�� ,
OWN
N N N
Multi-Family Gas Station
tsno
Z 4 74A9
s
191
10 tuts
tW
mo
19042
®® tt
too
100
Multi-Family RestaaeCgnt
'0 ' 1.25 Acp
7
s3 s4
19034
190
Multi
-Famil
1
18946
e
01
41M
stAS 18940
5.15 Ac(c)
2.86 Ac(c)
189
32M
Proposed Use Map
Owner. William S. Boozer
Case: FLD2006 -08048
Sites: 19080 US Highway 19 North
Property
Size Acres : 0.28
Atlas
Page: 309B
PINS: Parcel:
19- 29 -16- 00000 -140 -1100
S: \Planning Department \C D B \FLEX (FLD) \incomplete \US Hwy 19 N 19080 LineX (C) - JVS \Map Request
Form.doc
!/ - to
N IN
14M N
MHDR '
2 uA9
5
19246
14A4
19206
14A5
14A6
n
N �
n m 2
N N N
14/10
10 14/11
19100 100 100
® ® ® ®
53 64
19
042
too 100
MDR 41M1
72 1
7 1.25 Ac(c) 19034
1
18946
Cti
41A4 41M 18940
5.15 Acp
2.86 A c p
19135
Ac
o
N
MHDR
MDR
19029
1 32A2
O3.21 Ac�c�
18860 18911
Owner. William S. Boozer
Sites: 19080 US Highway 19 North
Atlas
Page: 309B
PINS: Parcel:
19- 29 -16- 00000 - 140 -1100
Zoning Map
Case: FLD2006 -08048
Property
Size(Acres): 0.28
S. \Planning Department \C D B \FLEX (FLD) \Incomplete \US Hwy 19 N 19080 LineX (C) - JVS \Map Request
Form.doc
FLD2006 -08048
19080 US Highway I . 9
North
9/13/2006
Subject Property
Location of proposed building addition
Subject Property
Location of proposed retention
Adjacent Western Property
Location of existing adjacent storm water retention
Adjacent Northern Property - Hess
Landscape buffer and trees appear to be in compliance
Adjacent Northern Property - Less
Landscape buffer and trees appear to be in compliance
Western Property Frontage — US 19
Freestanding sign does not appear to meet five foot setback
Western Property Frontage — US 19
Utilizes located in frontage
Adjacent Southern Property —Egg Platter
Freestanding sign and bins stop — Landscaping
Subject Property
Front of eastern building
Subject Property
Front of eastern building
Adjacent Southern Property —Egg Platter
Perimeter landscaping is weak in some areas
Adjacent Southern Property —Egg Platter
Perimeter landscaping is weak in some areas
Adjacent Southern Property — Egg Platter
Perimeter landscaping is difficult to provide under existing trees
Adjacent Southern Property — Egg Platt a..r
Perimeter landscaping is difficult to provide under existing trees
Adjacent Southern Property —Egg Platter
Perimeter landscaping is weak in some areas
Adjacent Southern Property — Egg Platter
Perimeter fencing is inconsistent — wood, chain link, plywood
Properties across US 19 (Six lanes)
Primarily residential and office uses across the major arterial road
known as US Highway 19 North.
0
SUhINIERLIN DR
4f
•
■
•
�k
JO)Scale; 1.5,617 Map: 262303.83, 1313235.29 --Image: 129, 296.
M", Notes -Microsoft Outlook
Li
M �P:: I
Visits " Note
■
r
•
IX4
Clearwater Zoning
l
Back
Locale Hell)
Exit.
Visible
Codes
P-1
Parcel
Information
NJI
Streets
•
0 Parcels
0 Future Land Use
We
0 Zoning
17
0 Pinellas Count-
Aerial Photo
2005
OMS I R
0
UP
•
■
W.
cl
4
•
•
•
N
cl-
'RARNf BLVD
..
T_
T-
45
_F
RAINKS
D
E-.
MDR
jGLENANN
DR
i-
0
SUhINIERLIN DR
4f
•
■
•
�k
JO)Scale; 1.5,617 Map: 262303.83, 1313235.29 --Image: 129, 296.
M", Notes -Microsoft Outlook
Li
M �P:: I
Visits " Note
■
r
•
IX4
........................... .... ...........
........ .
♦ Wk 16 M Refresh Map Abmabcally
[T .
P
49 & 0 W
Legend
'Pamel Infonytabon
S U8 ets i.
6q, 49 *,Jp 60 jk 4
E-1 PaTcah
0. 15ft LDR
------------- ----- ❑ OR
Ul
❑ MoR
F-1 MHOR
HDR
❑ F-1
IMHP
T
C
EJ
Local intranet
City of Clearwater G15 A P 8:40 Am
.
Clearwater Zoning
l
Layers
Visible
Active
Parcel
Information
NJI
Streets
•
0 Parcels
0 Future Land Use
We
0 Zoning
17
0 Pinellas Count-
Aerial Photo
2005
........................... .... ...........
........ .
♦ Wk 16 M Refresh Map Abmabcally
[T .
P
49 & 0 W
Legend
'Pamel Infonytabon
S U8 ets i.
6q, 49 *,Jp 60 jk 4
E-1 PaTcah
0. 15ft LDR
------------- ----- ❑ OR
Ul
❑ MoR
F-1 MHOR
HDR
❑ F-1
IMHP
T
C
EJ
Local intranet
City of Clearwater G15 A P 8:40 Am
.
CDB Meeting Date: December 19, 2006
Case Number:
FLD2006 -08048
Agenda Item:
D. 4.
Owner:
William S. Boozer
Applicant:
Line -X of Tampa Bay
Address:
19080 US Highway 19 North
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to allow a Limited Vehicle Service use
in addition to an existing Retail Sales and Service use in the Commercial
(C) District with a reduction to the minimum number of parking spaces
from 20 spaces to seven spaces; a reduction to the rear (west) setback
from 20 feet to five feet (to pavement); and a reduction to the side
(south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to match the existing building),
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 704.C.
CURRENT ZONING: Commercial (C) District
CURRENT FUTURE LAND Commercial General (CG)
USE CATEGORY:
PROPERTY USE:
EXISTING
SURROUNDING ZONING
Current Use: Retail Sales and Service
Proposed Use: Limited Vehicle Service/ Retail Sales and Service
North: Commercial (C) Automotive Service
AND USES: South: Commercial (C) District
East: Medium High Density Residential
(MHDR) & Medium Density Residential
(MDR) Districts
West: Commercial (C)
Station
Restaurant
Attached Dwellings
Automotive Service
Station
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
This 0.28 -acre site is located on the west side of US Highway 19 North approximately 200 feet south of
Ham Boulevard. The site consists of one parcel of land that has 60 feet of frontage along US Highway
19 North and is 200 feet in depth. The site and adjacent properties are zoned Commercial. The existing
site is utilized for Truck Depot, a Retail Sales and Service use that sells and installs automotive
accessories. Two buildings on the subject site are utilized to perform various tasks related to operating
an automotive accessory establishment, such as office /administration, showroom, installation, and
storage /warehouse. Very little landscaping exists due to a large amount of the site being covered with
buildings and asphalt. The paved parking areas are minimally designated or striped. A freestanding sign
is located at the northeast corner of the property. This sign is non - conforming with regards to setbacks,
overall height, and sign area. The surrounding area along US Highway 19 North consists of uses
typically found along major arterials roads, such as vehicle sales, retail sales and service, business acid
Community Development Board — December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 — Page 1
professional offices, and restaurants. The site is bordered to the north and west by a Hess automotive
service station. The adjacent property to the south was previously licensed as an Egg Platter restaurant,
but has been unoccupied for more than six months. The properties across U.S. Highway 19, to the east
consist of two large multi - family residential developments.
Development Proposal:
The redevelopment of the subject property involves the addition of a second primary use. When a new
use is proposed the following standards of the Code shall be satisfied: Section 3 -1202 (General
landscaping standards), Section 3 -1401 (Parking standards), and Section 6 -104 (Nonconforming
sign/redevelopment of principle use /structure).
The redevelopment consists of three components. The first component is the addition of another primary
use. The existing business, Truck Depot, is a Retail Sales and Service use that sells and installs
automotive accessories. The applicant proposes to add a Limited Vehicle Service use, Line -X, which is a
spray on truck bed liner business which consists of spraying a protective coating or lining to the cargo
beds of pickup trucks within an enclosed building. The applicant indicates that the business will have
low volume with less than ten sales per day.
The second component is the addition to the existing buildings. The existing site contains two, single -
story buildings that were designed to maximize space for a vehicle service establishment. The building
fronting on U.S. Highway 19 North is approximately 2,205 square feet in area, while the rear building is
approximately 1,060 square feet in area. An area that works as a turn around or hammerhead separates
the two buildings. The proposed 720 square foot addition is designed to connect the two buildings. This
addition will eliminate the aforementioned hammerhead, thereby creating a turn around issue.
The buildings exterior facades are primarily finished in painted concrete block accented with an
aluminum parapet wall. The architecture of the proposed addition integrates well and is accomplished
through the connection of the two buildings and matching existing design features, materials, and colors.
The building height and setbacks for the addition are consistent with those of the existing buildings.
The third component consists of various site improvements including: parking, landscaping, and signage.
The existing site is barely in compliance with current Code. The existing parking area is not stripped and
the primary drive aisle does not comply with the 24 -foot required width for a two -way drive aisle. The
area that separates the two buildings works as a turn around or hammerhead. This turn around area,
while confined, complies with the parking standards for a two -way turn around at 55.3 feet where 42 feet
is required. The proposed building addition will eliminate this area and further worsen the ability for a
standard length vehicle, let alone a 17 -foot to 20 -foot long pickup truck, to properly turn around on the
site.
The proposed parking improvements include redesigning the parking lot entrance along US Highway 19
North. This improvement will allow the introduction of landscaping and trees along the front perimeter
of the property, greatly improving the appearance of the property along US Highway 19 North and by
creating a place to relocate the existing non - conforming freestanding sign.
Flexibility Criteria: A review of the criteria for Limited Vehicle Service use was conducted and the
following inconsistent criteria have been identified:
Pursuant to Section 2- 704.E.3.b. of the Community Development Code, The reduction in side and/or rear
setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved design and appearance and
landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. While the reduction in side and rear setbacks
Community Development Board — December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 — Page 2
does not result in the most efficient parking layout it is an improvement over the existing non - stripped
asphalt lot. The site plan overall is a minimal improvement and the appearance of the site and building
are only marginally improved and landscaped areas are not in excess of the minimum required.
Pursuant to Section 2- 704.E.5. of the Community Development Code, Garage doors and bays shall be
located perpendicular to the abutting streets. Bays shall be screened from adjacent property by
landscaped walls or fences. The existing and proposed garage doors and bays are located perpendicular
to U.S. Highway 19 North, as required by this criterion. However, screening the garage and bay doors
from adjacent property with a landscaped wall or fence is not possible due to the location of the existing
building, parking, and the narrow width of the property.
The . applicant has not demonstrated how the proposal will enhance other redevelopment. effort in the
immediate area and Clearwater as a whole.
Minimum Lot Width: Pursuant to Section 2 -701 of the Community Development Code, the Minimum
Lot Width for properties located within the Commercial (C) Zoning designation is 100 feet. The existing
site provides 60 feet of width. The existing lot width does not result in a building that is out of scale
with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity.
Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.): Pursuant to Section 2 -701 of the Community Development Code, the Floor
Area Ratio for properties located within the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use designation is
0.55. The development proposal complies with an FAR of 0.32.
Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to Section 2 -701 of the Community Development Code, the
Impervious Surface Ratio for properties located within the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use
designation is 0.95. The development proposal complies with an ISR of 0.84.
Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Section 2- 704.C. of the Community Development Code, limited vehicle
service uses are required to provide a front setback of 15 -25 feet, a side setback of 10 -20 feet, and a rear
setback of 10 -20 feet. The development proposal provides a setback of 25 feet to the building from the
front property line. However, a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building)
has been requested to accommodate matching the proposed addition to the two existing buildings. A
reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) is requested to accommodate a
vehicular turn around area. The existing pavement along the side (north) property line exists at a zero
setback for the majority of the property line and compliance with the setback and landscape requirements
is not possible due to the placement of the existing buildings, drive aisle, and parking area. The
development proposal complies with the setback requirements and flexibility criteria of the Code.
Maximum Building_ Height: Pursuant to Section 2- 704.C. of the Community Development Code, the
maximum building height for a limited vehicle service use is 25 feet. The development proposal
complies with a building height of 15.33 feet.
Design standards for parking lots and parking arg_a.eg_s.
Pursuant to Section 3- 1402.A. of the Community Development Code, all parking lots shall be designed to
provide off - "street parking spaces, including aisles designed in accordance with the standards.
The primary issue with the proposed development is that there is insufficient room to provide the
required parking, a two -way drive aisle, and an area to turn around on the site. With the proposed
building addition all non - handicap parking spaces are oriented toward the back of the site. The proposal
does not demonstrate how vehicles will reverse direction to exit the site in a forward manner. This issue
Community Development Board — December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 — Page 3
exists due to existing site constraints with regards to the placement of the buildings on the 60 -foot wide
lot. The two -way drive aisle system requires a 24 -foot drive aisle and 18 -feet of turn around space for a
total of 42 feet. The existing site utilizes the area that separates the two buildings as a turn around or
hammerhead. While this turn around area is confined, it complies with the parking standards for a two -
way turn around by providing 55.3 feet where 42 feet is required. The development proposal includes
closing in the area between the buildings thus reducing the turn around area from 55.3 feet to 31 feet.
The turn around area proposed does not provide sufficient space for vehicles to turn around. The
development proposal does not comply with the design standards for parking lots.
Two alternative solutions are apparent. The most desirable solution is to pursue a cross access /parking
easement with the Hess station to the north. This will provide better access to and from the subject
property in a much safer and efficient method than the existing or proposed development. In addition it
could provide additional shared parking with the Hess station. It is understood that Hess customers often
leave their vehicles in the Hess parking to visit the existing Truck Depot business on the subject property.
The other alternative would be to provide a turn around similar to the one between the existing buildings.
Whether it is a covered area in order to appear as a single building or open to maintain the presence of
two separate buildings. Both solutions could be utilized to demonstrate compliance with the design
standards for parking lots.
Minimum Off - Street Parkin: Pursuant to Section 2- 704.C. of the Community Development Code,
parking is required to be provided at a rate of 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area of
the entire building (3,985 square feet of gross floor area = 3,985 /1000 x 5 = 19.93 = 20 parking spaces).
The proposal is requesting a reduction to the minimum number of parking spaces and for the parking to
be based solely on the office /showroom gross floor area, which is 1,192 square feet which provides 6
parking spaces. This is based on 1,192 square feet of gross floor area = 1,192/1000 x 5 = 5.96 = 6
parking spaces. The applicant has submitted a parking demand study to justify the parking reduction.
Pursuant to Section 3- 1401.C. of the Community Development Code, the Community Development
Coordinator may require an applicant to prepare a parking demand study in conjunction with a request to
make deviations to the parking standards. Prior to the preparation of such study, the methodology shall be
approved by the community development coordinator and in accordance with accepted traffic
engineering principals. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to
the parking standards are approved. The development proposal has demonstrated compliance through the
parking study.
The parking study consists of two components. The first component of the parking study has to do with
the design/layout of the proposed building. The portion of the building utilized by Line -X can
accommodate up to three vehicles while being serviced and the remainder utilized by Truck Depot can
accommodate three vehicles as well. The customer vehicles will be parked in the parking lot and
serviced in the install areas of the building by Line -X and Truck Depot employees. Customers are not
permitted in the service /install areas of the building. The cure time for the bed lines to dry is
approximately three to four seconds, but it requires three hours for it to harden enough for light use and
twenty -four hours for heavy use. .
The second component of the parking study is related to parking demand for a Line -X operation similar
to the proposed. Line -X has been in operation on Hercules Avenue for more than three years. Only six
parking spaces are provided on the Hercules site, so scheduling customers based on three of the seven
parking spaces is a part of their existing business knowledge. The average number of vehicles serviced
per day for the past three months is four in an eight -hour period with a high of eight, or one per hour.
Line -X expects the high visibility of U.S. Highway 19 to generate more business than their current
location in the Industrial Park. The Truck Depot's parking demand is similar to that of Line -X's
Community Development Board — December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 — Page 4
A third possibility is a shared ingress /egress and parking easement with the neighboring Hess station to
the north. The applicant is in the process of following staff's recommendation of obtaining such an
easement. However, due to the vast size of the adjacent property owner's corporate structure, the Hess
Corporation, it is uncertain if this component can be met. Evidence of this component has not been
provided to staff as the writing of this staff report.
The parking study has minimally demonstrated that the parking reduction can be justified. Staff feels the
best solution would be to obtain a shared parking and access easement with the Hess property to the
North.
Landscaping_ Pursuant to Section 3- 1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code, a 15 foot wide
landscape buffer is required along the front (north) property line. The applicant proposes to upgrade the
existing eight -foot landscape buffer in order to accommodate an existing parking area and drive aisle.
The proposal has provided additional landscaping at the northeast corner of the property to balance this
reduction, which can be supported. The proposal also includes upgrading the existing perimeter
landscape buffer along the side (south) property line by providing approximately 40, three - gallon
Ligustrum's to create a 116 -foot long hedge from the front property line to an existing six -foot tall fence.
The rear landscape buffer of ten feet has been proposed as a retention area with no landscaping. Along
the side (north) property line a small area around the dumpster enclosure has been proposed in an effort
to remove unnecessary asphalt and create additional open space. The adjacent property to the north has
installed a landscape buffer that provides an appearance that both properties are in compliance. The
development proposal proposes a hand water irrigation system, which cannot be supported. Staff has
considered the difficulties of planning around the existing buildings and site that were developed under a
previous Code that is much less restrictive than the current Code with regards to setbacks, parking,
stormwater retention, and landscaping. The development proposal regarding landscaping is not in
compliance with this portion of the Code.
Solid Waste: The development proposal will upgrade the existing solid waste facilities on site. The
proposed solid waste facilities have been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department,
even though they will still need to continue to back out on U.S. Highway 19. It is questionable as to how
a customer's vehicle will perform a turn around when the solid waste vehicle is emptying the dumpster.
Signag_e: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal. It is
noted that pursuant to Section 6 -104 of the Community Development Code, in the event a building
permit is required for the redevelopment of a principal use /structure nonconforming signs on the parcel
proposed for development shall be brought into compliance.
Fencing: The site has an existing six -foot tall fence along the south property line. The fencing is
composed of three different materials with the majority of the fence made up of board on board wood
fence that appears to be relatively new due to the lack of uniform appearance. The remaining materials
are chain link fencing and what appears to be a sheet of plywood. These portions of the fence visually
pale in comparison to the wood fence and should be replaced with a matching board on board wood fence
to create uniformity across the entire length of the fence.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the
subject property.
Community Development Board — December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 — Page 5
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency
of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2 -704 of the Community
Development Code:
' See above discussion regarding Minimum Setbacks and Landscaping
2 See above discussion regarding Minimum Off-Street Parking.
Community Development Board – December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 – Page 6
Standard
Proposed
Consistent
Inconsistent
F.A.R.
0.55
0.32
X
......
.. _
I.S.R.
_ _1111 _ . _
..� .
.95 __
_. 1111.
0.84
- _ � _ —�
_
X
._...________......_..�
..
Lot Area
...
5,000--1 0 000 square feet
12 000 square feet
X
.....
Lot Width
50-- 1 �._ �
v 00 feet
.
60 feet
.�...�.....
X
_ _
__.._�
Setbacks (to
Front 25 feet
East 25 feet
X
building)
Rear 20 feet
West: 8 feet
X1
_.__.______.... _� _111__1. —____.
Side: 10 feet
South:
Sou 5 feet
X1
_ ........
Side 10 feet
_ _
North: 31.2 feet
X
..-,. ........
Setbacks (to
....... 1.11._1...... ........ .1111..
Front: 15 feet
_. __ ....... ......... ._.
East: 8 feet
.. _... 1111 _._
X
......... ......111.1 .............
pavement)
_ _ �
Rear: 20 feet
_ 1111...
West t 5 fee
_
J X1
Side 10 feet
South: 7 feet
X'
Side 10 feet
North Zero feet TT
X
.....
Height
... ...
25 feet
...
15.33 feet
....
X
Off - Street
..... ....... ......... .......
Limited Vehicle Service – 4 - -5 spaces
............................................
7 parking spaces
...1111.. .....
X2
............. _..__ .........
Parking
per 1,000 GFA (20 parking spaces)
' See above discussion regarding Minimum Setbacks and Landscaping
2 See above discussion regarding Minimum Off-Street Parking.
Community Development Board – December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 – Page 6
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of
the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.E. of the Community
Development Code (Limited Vehicle Service):
Community Development Board — December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 — Page 7
Consistent
Inconsistent
...... .. 11.1111.1 ...
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in -lot area will not result in a building
......... .................. .
X
_1111....
which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the
_v _parcel proposed for development,
......... ...1..1 ............ ...1.1. ..1 111... .......1.11 ...
2. Front setback: The reduction in front setback results in an improved site
............................................
X
......... ....................................
plan or improved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess
of the minimum required.
..... .................... ................. . .......... .................. __ .. ......................... ...... .... ............................................................. _ .........
3. Side and rear setback: The reduction in side and/or rear setback does not
.. .........
X
......... .........
prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; ........................... .
.........
_..
4. Side and rear setback: The reduction in side and/or rear setback results in
_ _..�,.
X'
an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved design and
appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required
3. Off - street parking: The physical characteristics of a proposed building are
X
such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces
per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions
of the building will be used for storage or other non - parking demand -
generating purposes.
4. Garage doors and bays shall be located perpendicular to the abutting streets.
X
_ _
Bays shall be screened from adjacent property by landscaped walls or
fences.
�5. The facade of the building, fronts on
g, public roads are designed with
X
windows, cornices or other architectural features or treatments.
....... ..... ........ ......... ........ ......... .. 1 11.1..
6. The use does not involve the overnight, outdoor storage of automobiles.
X
..........
.............
7. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land
..................
X
........
which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas.
8. The design of
g the parcel proposed for development is compatible with the
X'
surrounding area.
1 See above discussion regarding Flexibility Criteria.
Community Development Board — December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 — Page 7
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as
per Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infll Redevelopment
Project):
1 See above discussion regarding Flexibility Criteria.
Community Development Board — December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 — Page 8
Consistent
Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from
X
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district
........ ........ ..
1.. 111..... ...11.1:..1 ..........
� _..._.....
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of
_ _
X�
the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
.......... ........................ ....... ......... _....... .....................
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly
................ ........
X'
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
........ ..1111... ..... .........
......
........................
4.� Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of
� g p p _ the proposed
X
development
.....1- ._ .. ......... ............... . ......1111... ........ ........................................... 1 ... .........
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use
........
X
...... .........
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;
or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of
a working waterfront use.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street
X1
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
❑ Changes in horizontal building planes;
• Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
• Variety in materials, colors and textures;
❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns;
❑ Building stepbacks; and
❑ Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and appropriate distances between buildings.
1 See above discussion regarding Flexibility Criteria.
Community Development Board — December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 — Page 8
COMPLIANCE WITH. GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level
Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code:
Inconsistent
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of I X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
............. _ ........ ......... ........... .......... .................... __._ .... _.... ...................................
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neiehborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. I I X
................................ ................ _. ............ ..................
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties.
See above discussion regarding Design Standards for Parking Lots and Parking Garages
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its
meeting of October 5, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to
the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of
law:
Findings of Fact:
1. That the 0.28 -acre subject property is located on the west side of the major arterial, US Highway 19
North approximately 200 feet south of Ham Boulevard;
2. That the property is located within the Commercial (C) District and Commercial General (CG)
Future Land Use Plan category;
3. That the development proposal includes the introduction of a new use, Limited Vehicle Service, and
is subject to the requirements of General landscaping standards, Parking standards, and
Nonconforming sign/redevelopment of principle use /structure standards;
4. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Parking Code;
5. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Landscaping Code;
6. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Signage Code;
7. That the development proposal will not enhance other redevelopment efforts; and
8. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property.
Conclusions of Law:
1. That the development proposal is not consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2 -704
of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is not consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2 -704.0
and 2 -704.E of the Community Development Code; and
3. That the development proposal is not consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals
as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code.
Based upon the preceding findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Planning Department recommends
DENIAL of the request for a Limited Vehicle Service use in addition to an existing Retail Sales and
Service use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the minimum number of parking spaces
from 20 spaces to seven spaces; a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 feet to five feet (to
Community Development Board — December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 — Page 9
pavement); and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to match the existing
building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 704.C.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
John Schodder, Planner II
ATTACHMENTS:
❑ Location Map ❑ Zoning Map
❑ Aerial Map ❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map
❑ Future Land Use Map
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesi Up, %r the next CDBI US Hwy 19 N 19080 LineX (C) - 121916 JVSIFLD2006-
08048 Sta.J'Report.doc
Community Development Board — December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 —Page 10
John Schodtler
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
(727) 562 -4547
iohn .schodtler(&myclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
• Planner II
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida January 2006 to present
Performed technical review and preparation of staff reports for land development applications such
as, but not limited to: site plans, Flexible Standard and Flexible Development cases (variances and
conditional uses). Made presentations to various City Boards. Created custom Crystal reports for
the planning department.
• Planner I
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida March 2005 to January 2006
Duties consisted of assisting customers with basic zoning and planning related issues. Performed
technical review and preparation of staff reports for land development applications such as, but not
limited to: site plans, Flexible Standard and Flexible Development cases (variances and conditional
uses). Made presentations to various City Boards. Created custom Crystal reports for the planning
department.
• Development Review Specialist /Associate Planner
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 1998 to March 2005
Assisted customers with basic zoning and planning related issues. Performed technical review of and
prepared staff reports for Flexible Standard cases (variances & conditional uses). Created custom
Crystal reports for the planning department.
Computer Systems Administrator. Maintained the department computers, software and networking
systems and trouble shooting difficulties at the departmental level and acting as liaison to the
Information Technologies Department for larger scale problems.
• Customer Service Representative
City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida October 1996 to August 1998
Duties consisted of assisting, directing and informing customers with occupational licenses and
building permits. Additional duties involve greeting customers, reviewing building plans, accounting
and general data entry.
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts, Business Management, Minor in Human Development, with Honors, Eckerd
College, 2006
LICENSES & CERTIFICATES
American Planning Association
Housing Rehabilitation Inspector (SBCCI)
Community Development Board — December 19, 2006
FLD2006 -08048 — Page 11
11-09 -'06 18:20 FROM- 7277896276 T -619 P001I001 F--397
r4l
z�
r
� � c
A
A LA
Z
N mo
C27
7—
O e
N
N
z�
r
� � c
A
A LA
Z
N mo
C27
�J
k •
e
L
{ w •- rs�VrL Y
Y
I
E
NOTE: ALL TREE STAKES AND SUPPORT WIRES
\ WILL BE REMOVED AFTER 1 COMPLETE
GROWING SEASON.
Remove Dead and Injured
Twigs, Trim No Leaders,
= Retain Natural Shape.
3/4 — 2 Ply Reinforced
Rubber or Plastic Hose
° White Surveyor's Tagging
Tape, 6" Length
3 — 12 Guoge Galvanized Wires
Spaced 120 Around Tree and
Set At A 45 "Angle With 3— # 68
Duckbill Anchors Or Equal
Remove after one growing season.
4' Min. Mound To Form Saucer
i I 3" Minimum Mulch Layer
12 Remove Burlap From
Around Top Of Ball
_ c Min
Planting Soil Mixture
-O
walooEalAOAeLE
S AP DR TWNE
3E STRAIGHT AND
:S FREE OF SCARS,
ID BOOTS
Kit
NOTE
STAKING & GUYING REOUM FOR
PALL, IF NECESSARY, OR AS
DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCMTECT.
S LAY OF BURLAP,
Bid #2
S - 1x4'Ki6" YX300e'N BATTENS,
Office /Showroom
CONNECTED WITH 2 -3/4" STEEL BANDS '
FERTILIZER TABLETS AS
OR APPROVED ALTERNATE
Service /Storage
REMOVE BURLAP AND ALL DE MATERIAL
1456 sq ft.
i[.eti.�nan�
•.siF- °°'t7I.W�a*FCSt��
� rn'.e"'r`.
.
M
WOOD BRACE (3 EA, W,)
si a'a
�t mur
T:e�a�1�.,.�ie_i
tI
crs�.umss +�i .r •.- w
YYe(IX�,krzSfR'+d5" .'bf'['i'.�4b��— •'dYiMGL t i�=il'
k •
e
L
{ w •- rs�VrL Y
Y
I
E
NOTE: ALL TREE STAKES AND SUPPORT WIRES
\ WILL BE REMOVED AFTER 1 COMPLETE
GROWING SEASON.
Remove Dead and Injured
Twigs, Trim No Leaders,
= Retain Natural Shape.
3/4 — 2 Ply Reinforced
Rubber or Plastic Hose
° White Surveyor's Tagging
Tape, 6" Length
3 — 12 Guoge Galvanized Wires
Spaced 120 Around Tree and
Set At A 45 "Angle With 3— # 68
Duckbill Anchors Or Equal
Remove after one growing season.
4' Min. Mound To Form Saucer
i I 3" Minimum Mulch Layer
12 Remove Burlap From
Around Top Of Ball
_ c Min
Planting Soil Mixture
-O
walooEalAOAeLE
S AP DR TWNE
3E STRAIGHT AND
:S FREE OF SCARS,
ID BOOTS
Kit
NOTE
STAKING & GUYING REOUM FOR
PALL, IF NECESSARY, OR AS
DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCMTECT.
OF THE ROOTSALL
PALM PLANTING DETAIL
CL.EARWATER INDEX No. 904, SH. tof 1
Rev. 8/21/06
N.LS
HEIGHT
S LAY OF BURLAP,
Bid #2
S - 1x4'Ki6" YX300e'N BATTENS,
Office /Showroom
CONNECTED WITH 2 -3/4" STEEL BANDS '
FERTILIZER TABLETS AS
OR APPROVED ALTERNATE
Service /Storage
REMOVE BURLAP AND ALL DE MATERIAL
1456 sq ft.
FROM TYNE TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL
`
.
M
WOOD BRACE (3 EA, W,)
HAL
MAR. TO BATTENS & STAKES
tI
WATER RING (6' WIDTH & HEIGHT)
PROVID NO A WATER COLLECTION BASIN
�I
(3) 1x4 "x36' WOODEN STAKES
�'�- -Y MULCH LAYER
HOTTOM OF ROOT MASS
r r
EXISTING UNDISTURBED SCIL
OF THE ROOTSALL
PALM PLANTING DETAIL
CL.EARWATER INDEX No. 904, SH. tof 1
Rev. 8/21/06
N.LS
HEIGHT
L r
Bid #2
MULCH 3' FROM STEMS
Office /Showroom
3' MULCH LAYER
FERTILIZER TABLETS AS
1192 sq ft.
Service /Storage
1253 sq ft.
1456 sq ft.
SPECIFIED. PLACE UNIFORMLY
`
AROUND ROOT MASS
PREPARED PLANTING SOIL
BETtkEEN MIDDLE AND
4
HOTTOM OF ROOT MASS
r r
EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL
SHRUB &
3 TO 5 17MES WIDTH
RDOTBALL
GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL
CLEARWATER INDEX No. 905, SH. 1 of 1
Rev. 7/15/99
N.T.S.
t
rvA
NERAL LANDSCAPE N0T
1. The Landscape Contractor shall grade planting beds, as required, to provide positive drainage and promote
optimum plant growth.
2. All recommended trees and plant materials will be graded as Nursery Grade No. 1 or better as outlined by the
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry "Grades and Standards for
Nursery Plants ", 7th Edition, 1998 as revised from time to time.
3. Ail planting shall be done In accordance with the Florida Nurserymen's and Grower's Associations approved
practices.
4. All plants shall be fertilized with Agrlform 20 -10 -5 tablets as per the manufacturers specifications In
conjunction with note N 5.
5. The planting soil shall be the approximate proportions as follows: 5v% sand and 509 organic material consisting
of native peat, well - decomposed sawdust, leaf mold and top sod. It shall provide a good pliable and thoroughly
mixed medium with adequate aeration, drainage and water - holding capacity. It shall also be free of all
extraneous debris, such as roots, stones, weeds, etc.
6. All planting areas shall receive a 3" layer of recycled hardwood log nulch, which Is to be watered -in after
Installation. `
7, The plant material schedule is presented for the convenience of the Landscape Contractor. In the event of a
discrepancy between the plan and the plant key, the plan shall prevcil.
8. Plants shall meet size, container, and spacing specifications. Any molerial not meeting specifications shell be
removed and replaced at the contractor's expense.
9. All tree and shrub locations are subject to change. All locations shot be approved by the City Project Manager
prior to planting.
10. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for examining fully bolt the site and the bid documents.
Discrepancies in the documents or the actual site conditions shall to reported to the City Project Manager in
writing at the time of bidding or discovery. No account shall be mace after contract completion for failure to
report such condition, or for errors on the part of the Landscape Contractor at the time of bidding.
11. Th e Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for securing all necessary applicable permits and licenses to
perform the work set forth In this plan set and the specifications. i
12. Plant material shall be bid as specified unless unavailable, at which time the City Project Manager will be notified
by telephone and in writing of Intended changes.
13. Any and all questions concerning the plan set and /or specifications shall be directed to the City Project
Manager at (727) 562 -4737.
14. There shall be no additions, deletions or substitutions without the W (,;tten approval of the City Project Manager.
15. The Landscape Contractor shall guarantee. In writing, plant survivoblzy for a period of twelve (12) months from
final acceptance by the City Project Manager.
16. All dimensions to be field- checked by the Landscape Contractor prkr to landscape material Installation.
Discrepancies shall be reported Immediately to the City Project Manojer.
17. All materials must be as specified on the landscape plan. If materla ?T or labor do not adhere to specifications,
they will be rejected by the City Project Manager with proper Installation carted out by Landscape Contractor at
no additional cost
18. All permits necessary are to be provided by the Installing contractor unless otherwise specifically stated In the
specifications.
19. No contractor Identification signs shall be permitted on the project, except for the project Information signs.
20. Existing sod shall be removed as necessary to accomodate new planiings. - -
21. Any existing sod areas that are unnecessarily disturbed during the landscape installation shalt be resodded to
- match existing,
22. The Landscape Contractor will be responsible for the collection, ramool, and proper disposal of any and oil
e debris generated during the installation of this project.
FERTILIZATION NOTES
SHRUBS AND TREES
All trees and shrubs shall be fertilized with "Agriform" 20 -15 -5 planting
tablets at time of installation and prior to completion of pit backfllling.
Tablets shall be placed uniformly around the root mass at a depth that
is between the middle and bottom of the root mass.
APPLICATION RATE:
1- Gallon can: 1 - 21 gram tablet
3 Gallon can: 2 - 21 gram tablets
5 Gallon can: 3 - 21 gram tablets
7 Galion can: 4 - 21 gram tablets
Trees: 3 - 21 gram tablets each 1/2" of caliper
Palms: 7 — 21 gram tablets
GROUNDCOVER AREAS
All groundcover areas shall receive fertilization with "Ozmocote' time
release fertilizer as per manufacturer's specifications.
Usage
Bldg #1
Bid #2
Totals
Office /Showroom
952 sq ft.
240 sq ft.
1192 sq ft.
Service /Storage
1253 sq ft.
1456 sq ft.
2709 sq ft.
The parking demand for 1192 sq ft. equals 1192/1000 X 5 = S.96 6 parking
} _. - k _ r
I BEEN, a KZ I '
-y a
REVIEWED By
� L
PROJECT ° ti O'
I ion I .r r _!_+
YV
X
Tie beam with
1 — #5 rebar continuous
12'
clearance min.
M IN
EN 111��ffl
swing gate (typ.)
" --1 — #5 at 4' center
14" T
" jr
$ 3 000 p.s.i. concrete slab with
fiber mesh reinforcing —
x 6 16" concrete footing monolithic, min 6" thickness,
w/ 2— #5 rebar (typ.) 6 "x6 "f 10x10 W.W.F.
VA`�IiV
N.T.S.
E
STR PE(TYP CA WHITE
L)
NOTE: j
All pavement markings to be thermoplastic. II
STALL DETAIL
L' z
00
0
M
VIN
lUxfSS>8lE
2EFLECTNE ALUMINUM
.EGEND AND BORDER — GREEN
YHIT OUNQL WHITEE BACKGROUND
TYPICAL AT ALL HANDICAP SPACES
rHiS SIGN TYPICAL AT All
VAN AC
PARKING CESSIBLE
SPACES•
PENALTY SIGN WITH
WORDING AS REQUIRED
BY STATE OR LOCAL LAW
-GALVANIZED °U' CHANNEL POST
4" DIA. SCH 40 GALVANIZED STEEL
FILLED WITH CONCRETE OSHA YELLOW
PAINT CONCRETE BLACK
AFTER CURING
O
i
fV
MIN.
!r f + i /r,......
.. rarTwlA�
MA
� >r . , d► .
REVIEWED 3s
. _a a-{ ,
IV*,
' I canc. Filled (typ) S
o a
10'_8" i in
8. drop pin
48" 1 E 1 T a i b ._ (tYp )
EO
1 — #5 at 4' center
HANDICAPPED SIGN
SEE INDEX NO. 119
CONIC. WALK RAMP DOWN CONC. WALK
SEE INDEX NO. 109
" WiDE TRAFFIC BLUE 8" WIDE TRAFFIC WHITE
TRIPE (TYPICAL) STRIPE (TYPICAL)
r
a �`a
s� I
i TRAFFIC WHITE
•o (ALOE;#
u s• —�
NOTE:
All pavement markings to be thermoplastic.
1 8" (TYPICAL) iii 1
"
REFLECTIVE ALUMINUM
LEGEND AND BORDER — GREEN
WHITE SYMBOL ON BLUE BACKGROUND
PHC3D
�lBACKCROUND ^WHITE
TYPiCAf[.. AU ALL HANDICAP SPACES
f.l
T}IIS SIGN TYPICAL. AT ALL
PARKINGCSPACES
PENALTY SIGN WrTH
WORDING AS REQUIRED
BY STATE OR LOCAL LAW
z
09
GALVANIZED "U• CHANNEL POST
pw
4" OIA. 5 40 GALVANIZED STEEL
Ea
PIPE BOLLAKD PAINTED OSHA YELLOW
FILLED WITH CONCRETE
o
r
p
DER CURING BLACK
w�
Lj
CONCRETE
o
,
't . *'` ►
�
�""' 4" MIN.
'
_I
!1 •�8"
ONE AT EACH HANDICAP SPACE.
PARKING SIGN
'�HANDICAP
•_
SCALEI NTS