Loading...
FLD2005-08091FLD2005-08091 1490 BELCHER RD N WEAVER BUSINESS CENTER Planning Department 100 South arwater Clearwater,,, Flo Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 -562 -4567 0 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: j-V LX -UU(� DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive In611 Redevelopment Project (Revised o4 -o -o5) —PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— ORIGINAL A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: _ MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: . FAX NUMBER: AM, 3 O 2 PROPERTY OWNER(S): J. C, �,y EAJL��YP i PLAN[4;ilyli- & DE b' -;,- ', i 6'iCS (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed —provide original signature(s) on page 6), f'UF";,� x'' i- AGENT NAME: PA-Mr-7 -7 71_"Hh 4-of C-14 t: T'->!!!Fc i t rnJ C, MAILING ADDRESS: 1&-34-- 54,0 ►e0 y PHONE NUMBER: 7 33 - 3 7 6% FAX NUMBER: 7 33 _3 7 6 9 CELL NUMBER: +_60 - O 99 E -MAIL ADDRESS: VO4, e C-H A 1'E • A) C"?' B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 4- 9 4b Aj A L— G" FaC LEGAL DESCRIPTION: .SUE A7774,4# (if not listed here, please note the location of this documegt in the submit%l) PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL SIZE: -�, /S 3 (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: .SEA — / RT - CJSE3 (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) 7'20 t,/ A C- y E 3.7 pt, i- 4_e o nl , DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): /Il.IOO /Gi e-4 "e:) -r% dF 17'L S 7-003 — 1 Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parldng spaces, specific use, etc.) TO 1-7q-1- `I S !.✓ Li C7-i o t- / ZZ ea�- (Z`)) C'e5 G.�S� 7WAo; C� (.D Dr-000 CD 1490 fj 13 F, I- c V4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, TWT Kff OF I= 15 W It LM "OF ME NM RK Ur WAY W RW Wft M OF 7W WW MW T WAY W MM W MW W WAY T &a. WlJM 9" W THE WW-W V4 W W:nN 0- TOW&V 9 ZM WW 0 6W. MiLU WV% A M 3, PAGE I OF Itf KfU W=U OF RfiM OWY, FURLK WM MW PAKTMALY 030M AS FQIM FWU Pf MST V4 0Wa OF WW t TMff 30 UM WN 5 EW " 7WW MOM &" IN E47 WW tX OF S WM THE W3M (F SEUM MX US FEET TO A PW LYW AT Df NMRWU CF SAD %JOB ADAD 4D WW M* Tff &" THE (EMM OF OW M ALSD RM A 0 AOF LW- 2W fWL ffW NW4N 420 FEET TO A PW LYW CN ff WNE 00 FM TfE PW OF HM#4 THDa NWWW &" " NWni W OF WAY VAW:FfEL' DiNI 4WW XW F UNWE 107JI KET POM MWPRt WD FEET TO A PW LYK W *E SM WK CF WAY OF'tHE IcL w"ft T43c k" SW ZM MW OF WAY MW FEET: 70 A POW LYW W Tff W3T Wff W WAY T BELM M THE " UWVE AUN WAY WA FEET TO A PW L" ON THE NW W CF WAY CF R&WE RDA NO MX M THE MW OF 93NM CONTAINING 137364.10 00. FT. OR 3,1585 ACK69 MORE OR LESS. 0 bm cv- r,, DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _X. (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable d( OOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) .W a Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. C .c 15 G Ta a *�.�,/ c 17 2'i 47 d C -'r-' 0 P 7 7 IP c , 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent lanpliNg�Id 66i n • , r impair the value thereof. ' ..._ �t::Il1�Can! 'o� TY C)F CL;, . ,'.; ;,•, , _, � %tlTC'ClO�C- tJSGf' 4 4:F- 10 4 ✓,s &-r ry o� co.✓sT +Puc�7o•J 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. /.Pr Zo�✓� — �t/D �✓oX/ocJS GtJrlCS olrl ,S f3JFETY AeCZ A-rr= Tom''» S [3 t 77 oo - L- /�JV f3G 7.; 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 772 G 1.9 No T ©i✓7 -y 77/•t /9,,027 i q L •r2o A e::::, OF 13 !•_u ef&72 — R A-it/ E AL:10 sq+:zV 'JiIF O Loo e- yr 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. �l c �.•S /.1-�� Co.e/sesy�4�/. t,✓� �'7� -t� / �7- zo�J E "-' .r/��'� �-F� 020 ✓ .9 � J'a L�� c C�� /d �o �2C.. i � 194✓. 9 L-e-S s /v.9.CC 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. !�-� � �- cc�i'- P2o o� 7-tts. •9c_S y �,.�L l •r2T ?l� t �?�'ra9 i �-✓! L t. 4:5 4 L&aS Ate✓ C T6e.9 J �T" Gv i4.2 � /to eJS c- � r� �9-s✓ y�� t:}"tJ�t: !e�✓ G,' Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain jug each criteria is achieved In detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. T,V C O4 -aAl& C 4/&2Z-Z S M 4.C7ysE �� Tv 7'�� i4 T-ra2,.4 -�z ✓� �y G 5� L-a c.s .T a onJ � .� y ! L w � hid rlst I�✓z E ,S ��� ��/G .si'�9 G �' ORIGINIAI 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) T� — R r &-x,; 7- PA 2GC t_ S Hy li✓C /A-� �wP9if/C� :XPV _by" Ts,�l rJ OPo S eV7 710 A ✓ 4 CA .r/7 The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. ye� -rW C C r-y Oo cs 0 0/�.�= c L , ,-0�67 -7w i 4- p� 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Acv 4 G tr✓T 4 -•4A/� -S r9-•e dF7 77 "' 'S 4-*'1 C y C co v.-/ Ty 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. Tr-ti a vle__.6'i /+/G iS rr/ dyG ! �✓T7�?¢T lT �.e0v /OAS' ea 2 V --IS 4, Z-:- Z-- l7nJ --- 6 .C&-- 7- A- A^/X7S c.9 off 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the Immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. TAE /a/T-&-,W_ /O 2 l%s tz%_ C I X l.S % F?C i7--7--1 O e '0 2 rn n2,,U n 7-7 Ot2 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off -street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. �LEx the A-r T-)' 7C> O�2Kin/Ci IS J a-S Ti r=, &-ag: oc/& r-6 �� IQET"i�I L A+ —tnP. rs f'QI OV .4 rZ I 1- 7-' 13L--c. o S 70 .e /9-6>7 FO Z PAV_ o o Gam- z.) /ecs V c^2 �-- ?N t //e7- 20 > — 9. Adequate off -street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on -street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. __��E� T.g L C G✓�! i✓ .SC C 7"I ep �✓ 3 `^I Q O .S' TO 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Divisio " 'offb3dtiJO (Wa li 6le).-Us separate sheets as necessary. Q AUIG 3 0 205 svcs Q Y(:: ORIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Critf Manual and 4- 202.A.21) /V/4 44/7-&--;*�- vs- 0 4/Z-',--" A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that in% addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to requirement If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. �At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. OPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL VZ(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable AcknoWedgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 5624750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) W SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; GI--TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, incl ding drip and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; & LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; "P KING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; --ry-`} 3 C� t- W �i •rJ S C—c . 3 — e a o $' � GRADING PLAN, as applicable; t] PREI�MjjVARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) M-;OE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36'x: D All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; F F-). Q1.15 3 0 2005 I i oow man size of all EXISTING buildings and structures, - — - - - - -- — PLANPdi:.. Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; °- - : •• • _. i All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation an d wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; ii Syr ORIGINAL Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Locati on of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. C3 SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; P W t tal b *-A; tab I fo ar ng spaces. o rum er, prase" a in u ar rm with the number of required spaces, Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; p/FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offstte elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; .� Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist°, of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, c. i� AL'5 3.0 2005 ]_'Jill ! I PLANN11'4G & DEVCLUPI' o-NI jVCSl QTYnFCLF.`.::;' and H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) B' LANDSCAPE PLAN: 404 All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; _ Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, Including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; — Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8' /z X 11) (color rendering if possible); ❑ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, As applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. ORI AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all properly owners on deed — please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) mac! uPA -V0Y 'I PAaet=.Vvc,, 12f��tStDn/s TC� L. t - --r_.a �,✓ t- r� ,e ��2�x1 z 2U n.,) l o 2% lE'�-T-� c - 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: - P.47-7"L T C irj —GI-J I -Ol/C- as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the properly are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to Visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That QAove), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and COUNTY OF PINELLAS Properly Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, Before me the undersigned, an officer duty commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this d S-'!� day of "V , 4005 personally appeared 3 . t` . WCtti_,.It.r who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. My Commission Expires: Mo-', (" SHERRY BIANCHARD MY COMMISSION # DD 086012 Bonded mN NMmy S:tPlanning Deparimer;nApplication Formswevelopment reviewV/exible development comprehensive infill redevelopment Notary Public 1' t ALTS 3.0 2005 J5.d6ct ACS i ORIGI I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. -Qr BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. �SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) 14 P1040 0d=--2--> S-G &/ zoo S' - 05" vd 0,' 0 All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to r c 0 All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) 17 Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). (y' Reduced signage proposal (8'r4 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. n ; K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: ( Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4 -801.0 / 1 ^ r ) FiANNIIVG �' dtvCE�ii'n, rl3'Y OF CE ❑ Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. + Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Sooping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Ref to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. B" Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each timing movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. _X Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in 's application. - 0. xly-' Sign atu of property owner or representative !!, SHERRY E Bonded Thru Notary STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Im to and subscribed before me this d6 - day of ugu Ste- A.D. 200S- to me and/or by J C w cay CT who isgeersonaly known has produced as identification. expires: rna, V ?-666 IIIIII Patti The olubitect, 3nc. OCT t a 20M NARRATIVE COMPREHENSIVE INFILL MODIFICATION FLS2003 -12060 1490 N BELCHER The Weaver Business Center was recently annexed into the City of Clearwater. At that -time it was given a zoning Classification of Industrial Research and Technology (IRT). In the acquisition of quality Tenants for this new building, Mr Weaver has secured tentative leases with Dyco Paints (Suncoast Design Center) A Warehouse and distribution Center of wall paper and paint design products. To better serve the Dyco Clients the owner would like to have a showroom of his materials. This would result in 3,400sf of area accessible to the public. This area does contain shelving with cans of paint and wall paper product. The total leasable area of tenant space G is 5,500 SF. See attached floor plan. Another Tenant is Bryn Alan Studio. Their primary area is used for dressing rooms and photography Studio space. In speaking with the planning department it was determined that this facility.would be classified as "retail'. The Florida Building Code considers this use a Professional service and is classified as a Business Occupancy. if determined by DRC that this is a retail occupancy than an additional 5,500 sf is a part of this request. The Existing NAPA Auto Parts has a retail area of 1800 SF. The total Building Square Footage is 37,000. The total retail area is 10,700 SF. (28.9 %). If Bryn Alan can be considered a Business occupancy and Dyco paints calculate only the people occupied floor area requested area would be within the 10% allowed by Flexible Critera for retail sales and service. The site is not contiguous to any parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas and does not have access onto a major arterial street (Belcher). The retail sales will serve primarily the employees and the patrons of this distribution facility. A parking analysis is provided .due to the mixed use of this facility to support this additional retail area. The restaurant was approved within a previous DRC meeting. It is currently un- leased and may revert to wholesale /distribution/warehouse facility. 1634 SAN Roy DRIVE - DUNEDIN, FL 34698 - 727- 733 -3769 - AA C002103 �IIIII Patti TO Olubitett, Inc. 1634 SAN ROY DRIVE • DUNEDIN, FL 34698 • 727 - 733 -3769 • AA C002103 _J _J U ND. COND_ ' ■.art � ■ ■��t�lai■ W `! 30 r- 14 z �rn m -PARKING ANALYSIS October 10, 2005 SECTION -3 -1405 WEEKDAY � WEEKEND USE/ OCCUPANCY TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED NIGHT MIDNIGHT 6 A.M. DAY 9 A.M. 4 P.M. EVENING 6 P.M. MIDNIGHT DAY 9 A.M. 4 P.M. EVENINGS 6 P.M. MIDNIGHT RESTURANT 20 2.0 11.5 20 11.5 20 RETAIL 54 5.4 27 0 54 38 MARKETING & DEVELOPMENT 17 1 17 1.7 1.7 1 WARE HOUSE 28 28 28 28 28 28 TOTAL 119 34 84 50 96 87 WEAVER BUSINESS CENTEI;�RIGINAL PARKING ANALYSIS August 25, 2005 SECTION -3 -1405 WEEKDAY WEEKEND USE/ T TOTAL N NIGHT D DAY E EVENING D DAY E EVENINGS RESTURANT 2 23 2 2.3 1 11.5 2 23 1 11.5 2 23 RETAIL 5 54 5 5.4 2 27 0 0 5 54 3 38 MARKETING & 1 17 1 1 1 17 1 1.7 1 1.7 1 1 WARE HOUSE 2 28 2 28 2 28 2 28 2 28 2 28 TOTAL 1 122 3 37 8 84 5 53 9 96 9 90 -M ROT AUG lo 2005 PLAj 4, (alYCk ... _. 4 5� 3& �C5 ORIGINAL FLD2005 -08091 1490 N BELCHER RD AILIG 10 2005 Pl.33,NN!N'Gi & DEVF -0P?,Al- NTSVCS CITY OF C! Date Received: 08/25/2005 THE WEAVER BUSINESS CENTER ZONING DISTRICT: IRT LAND USE: IL ATLAS PAGE: 271B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 4:20 PM To: Patti Stough (E -mail) Subject: Draft 11.3.05 DRC comments, 1490 North Belcher Road Patti - Attached are the Draft comments for the November 3, 2005, DRC meeting for FLD2005- 08091, 1490 North Belcher Road, at 3:50 pm. Wayne draft 11.3.05 dre action agend... Clearwater cli������ October 10, 2005 Patti The Architect Inc 1634 San Roy Dr Dunedin, F134698 CITY OF CLE ;RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W WW.MYCLEARWATER.COM RE: FLD2005 -08091 -- 1490 N BELCHER RD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Patti The Architect Inc : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005- 08091. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on November 03, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727 -562 -4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, /% to M. AA& Wayne Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005 -08091 - 1490 N BELCHER RD Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 6:57 PM To: Patti Stough (E -mail) Subject: FLD2005- 08091, 1490 N. Belcher Rd. Patti - Attached is a Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne {__ letter of ,mpleteness 10.10.0 October 10, 2005 Wayne Wells Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: FLD2005 -08091 1490 Belcher Rd Dear Wayne, IIIIII Patti TO Oxtbitett, Int. Attached you shall find 14 copies the the revised site plan, showing the 10,700 sf of retail area and the location of these areas within the Weaver Business Center. Also attached is a narrative that outlines the request in detail and a copy of the Landscape Plan. Should you have any questions or need further information do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Patti hitect, Inc. Patricia M. Stough, AIA AR0010684 PMS laws CC: Mr. Weaver 1634 SAN ROY DRIVE • DUNEDIN, FL 34698 • 727 - 733 -3769 • AA C002103 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 9:32 AM To: Patti Stough (E -mail) Subject: FLD2005- 08091, 1490 N. Belcher Road Patti - This morning you dropped off additional information regarding the above referenced project. The following is still necessary or is of question: 1. Since 15 copies are required to be submitted with the original submission and only 14 copies of the revised site plan were submitted today, submit one additional revised site plan. 2. Submit 14 additional copies of the landscape plan (only one submitted today). 3. Concern: The original FLS case to construct the site and building improvements (FLS2003- 12060) included 83 parking spaces. It appears that 15 additional parking spaces were added to the rear of the building under FLS2004 -12082 when adding the retail for NAPA and the restaurant. The site plan for this submittal appears to be adding 12 parking spaces on the west side, which has not been part of the request and are located within the required 15 -foot side setback. The landscape plan does not show these additional 12 parking spaces. Option A: If these 12 additional parking spaces are desired, need to revise the site plan to show them formally (drawn to scale) with curbing and wheel stops, requested setback to pavement, provide revised drainage calculations, revise the landscape plan, revise the application and narrative, etc. (Need 15 copies of revised application materials) Option B: If these spaces are not intended, then revise the site plan removing these 12 additional parking spaces from the west side (Need 15 revised site plans). 4. While revising the site plan, since under FLS2004 -12082 the restaurant was restricted to 2000 square feet, revise the parking calculations on the western portion of the building from 2300 to 2000 square feet (see #3 above for number of copies of the site plan). Please submit the above copies today by 4:00 pm. Wayne Clearwater October 06, 2005 Patti The Architect Inc 1634 San Roy Dr Dunedin, Fl 34698 CITY OFCLE_.RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W .MYCLEARWATER. COM RE: FLD2005 -08091 -- 1490 N BELCHER RD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Patti The Architect Inc : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005- 08091. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide a narrative that outlines the request in detail, including what types of retail businesses proposed and their characteristics. 2. You are asking for 10,700 square feet of retail uses. Indicate on the site plan which units you are asking for such and the square footage of those units. 3. Provide a copy of the landscape plan. Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 9:00 am on Monday, October 10, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727 -562 -4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Yv � i L Wa e/ Wells Yn Planner III m Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005 -08091 - 1490 N BELCHER RD Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 3:01 PM To: Patti Stough (E -mail) Subject: FLD2005- 08091, 1490 North Belcher Rd. Patti - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced project. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne letter of completeness 10.6.. 90 N BEL H R Case Number: FLD2005 -0 091 -- 14 3:50 pm 8 C E RD Owner(s): Weaver Enterprises Inc am 2050 Weaver Park Dr t V' Clearwater, F133765 r, TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Patti The Architect Inc y 1634 San Roy Dr Dunedin, F134698 TELEPHONE: 727 - 733 -3769, FAX: 727 - 733 -3769, E -MAIL: parch @gate.net Location: 3.158 acres located on the northwest corner of North Belcher Road and Range Road. Atlas Page: 271 B Zoning District: IRT, Industrial, Research and Technology Request: Flexible Development approval to permit retail uses at 28.9 percent (rather than the maximum 10 percent) of the gross floor area in the IRT District, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 1304.C. Proposed Use: Wholesale /distribution/warehouse facility Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727 - 725 -3345, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: Djw @gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard, Tom Glenn Applicant/Rep: Patti Stough The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . No Issues. Environmental: 1 . No Issues. Fire: 1 . No issues Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 , No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . No issues. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - modification of dev. order - has already paid P &R fees on 8/3/05 (FLS2004- 12082) Stormwater: 1 , No Issues Solid Waste: 1 . That dumpster service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727 -562 -4930 Proportional cost for for solid waste service for tennets will be borne by the owner of the property and will not be allocated by the Solid Waste Department. Traffic Engineering: 1 . No issues. Planning: General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 72 I . On the Site Plan wrtnin the building where the parking calculations are indicated, revise the total required from 122 to 119 parking spaces. 2. General Applicability criteria #5 response - Primary uses anticipated for the IRT District are industrial uses. Retail uses are intended to be accessory to the industrial uses, therefore the reason for restricting usage to no more than than 10 percent of the building square footage. Unclear how an increase to 28.9 percent is consistent with this, irrespective of parking. 3 . General Applicability criteria #2 response - The City of Clearwater does not have large areas zoned IRT, but does have large areas zoned Commercial District. While it is apparent that the retail uses will be an interior use of the building, it appears that the introduction of higher amounts of retail displaces the ability of industrial uses to locate within properly zoned areas. Staff is not supportive of this request. Quality of construction of the building relative to industrial or retail usage does not appear to be an issue. Need to provide greater justification as to the inability for retail uses to locate in properly zoned commercial areas. 4. General Applicability criteria #6 response - Unclear how retail uses will be less adverse than warehouse /manufacturing uses. Provide greater detail. 5 . General Applicability criteria #1 response - Provide greater justification as to HOW the introduction of retail uses as primary uses (not accessory uses primarily serving the employees or patrons of the industrial uses) is in harmony with the character of the adjacent properties. 6. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response - Unclear how the location of the building and the exterior appearance of the building makes the leasing of the tenant spaces impracticable and requires the introduction of retail uses as primary uses in excess of 10 percent of the gross floor area. Provide specific information that details the inability for retail uses as a primary use cannot locate within properly zoned commercial areas. 7. Comprehensive Infrll Redevelopment Project criteria #2 response - Provide specific information HOW a retail use will increase the value of the property over the leasing of the property to industrial uses, which the property was designed for. 8 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 response - Retail and restaurant uses are permitted only as accessory uses (therefore the restriction to a maximum of 10 percent of the gross floor area), not as primary uses, and must be to serve the employees or patrons of the industrial area. 9. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 response - Unclear what you are indicating - retail tenants are quality, whereas industrial tenants would not be quality tenants, even though the building was designed for industrial tenants ( ?). HOW will the introduction of primary retail tenants into this industrial property upgrade the immediate vicinity? 10. Narrative from Patti the Architect - Fifth paragraph - Unclear how Bryn Alan Studio will "serve primarily the employees and the patrons of this distribution facility." Disagree. It is a completely commercial operation that will serve a large area, way beyond the industrial area this property is located in. 11 . Narrative from Patti the Architect - Sixth paragraph - The ability to have adequate parking is one function of the review. The type of use (commercial retail) is the primary point of review and its relationship to the industrial zoning and intent of this district. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 12/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 11/8/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 73 b 3:50 pm Case Number: FLD2005 -08091 -- 1490 N BELCHER RD Owner(s): Weaver Enterprises Inc 2050 Weaver Park Dr Clearwater, F133765 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Patti The Architect Inc cow1w4w1h 1634 San Roy Dr Dunedin, F134698 TELEPHONE: 727 - 733 -3769, FAX: 727 - 733 -3769, E -MAIL: parch @gate.net Location: 3.158 acres located on the northwest corner of North Belcher Road and Range Road. Atlas Page: 271 B Zoning District: IRT, Industrial, Research and Technology Request: Flexible Development approval to permit retail uses at 28.9 percent (rather than the maximum 10 percent) of the gross floor area in the IRT District, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 1304.C. Proposed Use: Wholesale /distribution/warehouse facility Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727 - 725 -3345, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: Djw @gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard Applicant/Rep: J.C. Weaver, Patti Stough, The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . No Issues. Environmental: 1 . No Issues. Fire: 1 . No issues 2 . Before a permit is issued the address situation for this property is cleared up. We have been getting different addresses for permits ie:1490 Belcher Rd.; 2196 Range Rd.; 2250 Weaver Park Dr. and it is creating a conflict. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . No issues. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - modification of dev. order - has already paid P &R fees on 8/3/05 (FLS2004- 12082) Stormwater: 1 . No Issues Solid Waste: 1 . That dumpster service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727 -562 -4930 Proportional cost for for solid waste service for tennets will be borne by the owner of the property and will not be allocated by the Solid Waste Department. Traffic Engineering: I . No issues. Planning: General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 72 s- . . 1;�. 1 . On the Site Plan witmn the building where the parking calculations are indicated, revise the total required from 122 to 119 parking spaces. 2. General Applicability criteria #5 response - Primary uses anticipated for the IRT District are industrial uses. Retail uses are intended to be accessory to the industrial uses, therefore the reason for restricting usage to no more than than 10 percent of the building square footage. Unclear how an increase to 28.9 percent is consistent with this, irrespective of parking. 3 . General Applicability criteria #2 response - The City of Clearwater does not have large areas zoned IRT, but does have large areas zoned Commercial District. While it is apparent that the retail uses will be an interior use of the building, it appears that the introduction of higher amounts of retail displaces the ability of industrial uses to locate within properly zoned areas. Staff is not supportive of this request. Quality of construction of the building relative to industrial or retail usage does not appear to be an issue. Need to provide greater justification as to the inability for retail uses to locate in properly zoned commercial areas. 4. General Applicability criteria #6 response - Unclear how retail uses will be less adverse than warehouse /manufacturing uses. Provide greater detail. 5 . General Applicability criteria #1 response - Provide greater justification as to HOW the introduction of retail uses as primary uses (not accessory uses primarily serving the employees or patrons of the industrial uses) is in harmony with the character of the adjacent properties. 6. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response - Unclear how the location of. the building and the exterior appearance of the building makes the leasing of the tenant spaces impracticable and requires the introduction of retail uses as primary uses in excess of 10 percent of the gross floor area. Provide specific information that details the inability for retail uses as a primary use cannot locate within properly zoned commercial areas. 7. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 response - Provide specific information HOW a retail use will increase the value of the property over the leasing of the property to industrial uses, which the property was designed for. 8 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 response - Retail and restaurant uses are permitted only as accessory uses (therefore the restriction to a maximum of 10 percent of the gross floor area), not as primary uses, and must be to serve the employees or patrons of the industrial area. 9. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 response - Unclear what you are indicating - retail tenants are quality, whereas industrial tenants would not be quality tenants, even though the building was designed for industrial tenants ( ?). HOW will the introduction of primary retail tenants into this industrial property upgrade the immediate vicinity? 10. Narrative from Patti the Architect - Fifth paragraph - Unclear how Bryn Alan Studio will "serve primarily the employees and the patrons of this distribution facility." Disagree. It is a completely commercial operation that will serve a large area, way beyond the industrial area this property is located in. 11 . Narrative from Patti the Architect - Sixth paragraph - The ability to have adequate parking is one function of the review. The type of use (commercial retail) is the primary point of review and its relationship to the industrial zoning and intent of this district. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 12/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 11/8/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 73 Pinellas County Property Appv '-er Information: 12 29 15 70182 100 1511' Page 2 of 5 12 / 29 / 15 / 70182 / 100 / 1500 04 -Oct -2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:44:20 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales WEAVER ENTERPRISES IHC OBK: 04376 OPG: 1643 2050 WEAUER PARK DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 -2175 EVAC: Non -EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr; 0 of Jan 1,.2005, based on Census Tract: 267.03 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 1914: Book 003 Pgs 015- 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 O/ 0 0 { ) 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 418,600 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 418,600 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 418,600 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage; 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 8,583.66 1) 0 x 0 3. 50 140, 698. 0 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save- Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 9,727.09 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2A05 taxes will be ; 9,727.09 Short Legal PINELLAS GROUES HE 1/4, PART OF LOTS 15 & Description 16 DESC AS FR SE CDR OF HE 1/4 OF HE 1/4 RUN W SOFT & Building Information http:// pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =l &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u =0 &... 10/4/2005 Pinellas County Property App - ',er Information: 12 29 15 70182 100 1511 12 / 29 / 15 / 70182 / 100 / 1500 Page 3 of 5 04 -Oct -2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 16:44:16 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: i0 Vac ant Extra F c at ur c s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) [414®TTMM http:// pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u =0 &... 10/4/2005 Pinellas County Property App- ' ,er Information: 12 29 15 70182 100 11" Page 4 of 5 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) �J n, http: // pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u =0 &... 10/4/2005 Nnellas County Property AppWr Information: 12 29 15 70182 100 1 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http: // pao.co.pinellas.fl.us /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r- -.16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u =0 &... 10/4/2005 , t r_ _ _ .. __, _ ._ _ _ , , _ . ,..___ _ ,__ __ __ __ _ :.. , _ __,_s;:..... - _._ •...., _.arc,. , -+in a. �.__, ..:,W_4'_�?`,:�....:&. zrFrf ;_,_•.P*�.,__�c_�`s._."�:t.: �.v i',1•t:.1i4..3 ter:- `�+tq,;R.*,•!�.,.•!k�"_ .'Y • :.. .- L <.Yr 304 .. ..... Mw 7" � +rte / • _ .,, �♦r ,_ �.i f'/ r ' ' • >rl0�illj�lh3lillfe >Ae,�>s�r •gip _ � � • '' • t t _ Bull 19111:1=90 _ , I is / /r U. • aba `�...... , r uaa. t •'r. � � � / �'`�•. mot, � �.. �. _ �, I s r • a • r Ir • y ♦R... 1 1 • arc 1 I • � r T i ) • _ 111 i i • }• t • �, 1 MAI , • i JiJ Ji • C( d ! 1 1 • ;j; ! , ,, .: r. ..,. ,.., :i�iri.►_ ��s,s \_. V i e. .•� .,:.ate. • ['; , /�/ /tip / . •,�_ - - - - -- - ° -- _,. • _ 7 i , y ► j t }• t' it 1 1 11• r r ■ r I L _ h � t f , a V •. .alt • _. S , •. �: •. n t JJ .. , . ,... aT • ' � • �: ♦ r • a a+ r e ► r`r ifWAFVA v , r. .t I { _ r�rfl�l • • r • x r • J r 1 r • ) i 1 r \ . iIIII i / • _ 1 t • T i 1 r a r J 1 ri r -) r rai i ili ►.•c. i i r i 1 I _ 1 •1 , ! r { i • 1, 1 , • iY > _ _ _ , _, . , • ; ♦ ,. ....... is � a th) a L ,. - � �' li 1 � w ,a : • t ail s I • 1 4 •.. y .. J 1 fl . . ► s I • • i l� r n I , • ;E : M t r° r } • ` r / r f . } a ..:. i . . _. k. J 7 , i // : 1 r p� 1 r o I 1 : J •• r « _ I .�i t ff y 1!f!!lA C Y • 1 r . I • • ! Y' • I t 1 1 l • , 1 s , ■ i l.i a •t : ... • / sae„ • 1 i , t ,r /I r` , LI r , • , • � of f • � • • �C_ � • ti� , , ; , • 1 ! • • • • ` , a ilt• C ,. * / I t • r , , F i . , / Y _ a • O*A�604Hi I 6 - ■ R t. - .�� , �ISra,alrl ■ NINE _ ::: _ • • • �� r► r i i i ,1 � �� � • t i • . • . ��•� I �•1r�'� • •. . .• r • t ! { , i / / / / / % / / / /mil / / /,� / /.�/ v � • t is rr EXISTING 4 - _ ,. a