The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2007-06024FLD2007-06024 1200 ROGERS ST MISSOURI & ROGERS PARKING LOT Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMEW City OF CLEARWATER FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Innll Redevelopment Project (Devised 10/25/2006) — PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: John H. Meek, Jr 1211 Court St, Clearwater, FL 33756 727 - 446 -5051 CELL NUMBER: John H. Meek, Jr Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland St., ##930, Clearwater, FL 33755 727- 443 -2869 FAX NUMBER: 727 - 446 -8036 727- 235 -8475 E -MAIL ADDRESS: renee @northsideengineering.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: Missouri & Rogers Parkinq Lot PROJECT VALUATION: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED USE(S): 1200 Rogers St ' - +- ` ^� - - - - -- 15- 29 -15- 38574- 018 -0301 0.154 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): d`^446-r-a4 See attached survey Free standing Parking Lot I DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) See attached. Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ( ©R), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See attached 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See attached 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See attached 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See attached 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See attached 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See attached RECEIVED OCT `15 200 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See attached 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See attached 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See attached 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. See attached 5. . The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. See attached 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. ORIGINAL e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between builEl} See attached OCT 15 20F PW�NiN� DEPARlh Ell Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. • At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; • Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Cl Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans,and calculations. Cl COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWh4D) PERMiT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): _ Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; f1 TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ®a� �v RAG 1 TO ot Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) V SIT PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and W(}' * cv * _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: V t 0. 1 1 EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and /_ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. W` REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8/2X 11); OR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) (Ul LA IJSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): 1� All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant __ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. I/ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/ X 11); W/ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; (' All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; h Sight visibility triangles; iY REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8 %X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) V�ffAb -1' Ste All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) !'\ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). Reduced signage proposal (8% X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. 0?1 G` N`NG ��P�R Page 6 of 8 0 pF G G K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a " Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. C1 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. t OAq �Orv" CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. O Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. r Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. <�t,/�:� c �'c t�r��) C CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FL/ in CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUSTS s--t RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. O im If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this appli ion are true and accurate to the best of my STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELL S Sw to and subscribed before me this day of .� knowledge d authorize City representatives to visit and U m A.D. 20 b to me anddLkby —��'b photogr the property described in this application. r is personallyknown -ha " - "-- .. ation. JP Sig re of property owner or representative 1c, My commission p s:1/1 1 4 "Jky JEFFREY IZZO OSp0.Y PVB�y' r + Notary Public - State of Florida Pa e 7 of 8 = �" » 'My Commission Expires Nov 14, 2009 g + " °P` Commission # DD 450540 Bonded By National Notary Assn. 3H oU Z LL Z z U 9L 06!04/2007 08:55 7274468036 NORTHSIDE ENG SVCS PAGE 03;'04 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed – PRINT full names: John H. Meek, Jr. 2. That (I amHve are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 15/25/15/38574/018/0301 3. That this property constitutes the property forwhich a request for a: (describe request) Parking Lot 4. That the undersigned (has /have) appointed and (does /do) appoint: Roush Ghovaee, Noxthside Engianeezing services, Inc. as (his/thelr) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5, That this affidavit has bean executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6_ That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property'described in this application; 7, That (Ilwa), the unde 'gned author hereby cerffy that the foregoing is true and correct. !. ,• ,1 Proiferty Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property-Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an ofiicerduly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this �_ _ day of personally appeared C) 1111 r� • r�� t' ('� who having been first duly sworh Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. RAMONA E. AUTRY ` r1jP- *-.e1r; Notary Public - Florida My Commission # D 649078 4 ' �• °g Expires: March 11, 2011 _,_ irrl �, of °�f Bonded by Western Surety Cempany Notary Public Signature ° 0 N My Commission Expires:, W h- t) 1_., Pagc 7 of 7 LAA W w� 0 J OU go i a August 28, 2007 Exhibit "A" to Flexible Development Level Two - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project 1200 Rogers Street FLD2007 -06024 NES Project #724 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Flexible development approval to construct an off - street parking lot as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with reductions to the following: Lot Width: West (along Missouri) South (along Rogers): Lot Area: Setbacks (all to pavement): North: Reqd: 10' South: Reqd: 25' West: Reqd: 25' East: Reqd: 10' Reqd: 100' Reqst: 67' Reqd: 100' Reqst: 84' Reqd: 10,000 sq ft. Reqst: 6,728 sq ft Reqst: 5' Reqst: 10' Regst:--;�—" and 10' Reqst: 0' Also, reductions to the required landscape buffers through a Comprehensive Landscape Application to allow a 14'and 10' landscape buffer where 15' is required along the western property line, to 3.5' landscape buffer where 10' is required along the southern property line adjacent to the pond and to allow 0' landscape buffer along the east property line where 5' is required. Also, a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.50% pursuant to Section 3- 1202.G (See Landscape Narrative). GENERAL APPLICABLE CRITERIA (Code Section 3- 913.A) 1. The proposal contemplates approval of an off - street parking lot; the design therefore, will be similar or less than the scale, bulk, coverage, density of the surrounding sites. 2. Upon completion, the proposed off - street parking lot and subsequent o a improvements will increase the value of the subject site and the adjoining site N �a - - - -- - -- to the east;- ,thereby �ding� a positive influence on the `surrounding property , values. The proposed off -stmt parking lot will offer improved drainage, 2 z O parking and drive surfaces; an improved access point and new landscaping. 1 All of which will further promote development and investment in the area and along this main corridor. 3. No.health or safety concerns are anticipated with the proposed development as the site d sign adheres to all required visibility triangles, provides responsible site drainage and further provides nicely landscaped yards along the street. 4. The proposed off - street parking lot will minimize traffic congestion by providi�ess to the site from a secondary street (Rogers Street) rather than Misuri Avenue. The access provides improved curb cuts and aprons with ann lonriate radii. 5. The proposed improvements to t site will be cons tent with the surrounding character; providing an enhanc treetscape nd providing further encouragement for redevelopment in tla� -aroma. �fe evelopment of the off - street parking lot is a permissible use within the Commercial District. 6. No additional adverse effects relating to visual, acoustic olfactory or hours of operation issues will be created by the proposed development. No visual obstructions are being created with the proposal and the development plan will improve th�.isting situation of unimproved parking surfaces. The hours of peer jation for t-hi off s.treet�park�i� -blot will mi ox the operating Mrs�" of the neighboring site to the east for which the parking lot will serve, onday through Friday from 8 am to 5 pm. Section 2 -704 Flexibility Criteria: C. Comprehensive infill redevelopment project 1. The site consists of three substandard lots (each 25' in width). With the massing of three lots, in this particular situation, the end product results in the ability to lay out only 13 parking spaces. This site would be impractical to develop without deviations due to the minimal land area available even with the massing proposed. Therefore, we believe this proposed development is the most reasonable use for the site due to the minimal land area available even with the massing of three lots. 2. Site access will be provided from the commercial secondary street (Rogers %at Street) in lieu of along Missouri Avenue which is in keeping with the goals and policies outlined within the Comprehensive Plan. Off - Street Parking Lots w are an allowable use with the Commercial District of the Land Development o a _� 9 LL Code. ' 2 3. The proposed development of the site as an off - street parking lot will not impede the improvements of the surrounding properties; the proposed improvements will enhance the normal and orderly development of the surrounding properties. 4. By providing site improvements such as: proper parking surfaces, appropriate and responsible drainage; improved landscaping and appropriate site access, detrimental impacts on the adjoining,propertisare no..t anticipated. 5. Off - street parking lots are a p' ermissible use within the Commercial district as a minimum standard and /will provide supportAo- a-166al business by providing additional parking for customers and employees. 6. a. The proposed development of the site as an off - street parking lot will not impede the improvements of the surrounding properties; the proposed improvements will enhance the normal and orderly development of the surrounding properties. b. There are no specific applicable design guidelines for this area of the City. Through this application, we are proposing improvements to the site and are working within the flexibility development guidelines. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed parking lot are compatible with the commercial character of the area. d. The majority of the items below are intended to address a development proposal inclusive of a building; this proposal contemplates development of an off - street parking lot and therefore many of the following items do not apply: i. N/A ii. N/A iii. A variety of colors, textures and heights will be provided through the landscape design. The landscaping will greatly enhance this vacant and currently unattractive site. iv. N/A v. N/A vi. N/A e. The proposed setbacks and buffers are similar and in most cases more than the surrounding developments; the adjacent properties to the east provide zero setbacks from pavement to the street as parking is designed for direct back out on to the street; the three sites east of th subject site also provide little setback to the rear (approx. 5') and sid! yards (approx. 0') to building. The property to the north appears too � provide zero buffers and setbacks to pavement along the north, west and southern property lines. Further, the two sites west of our site, across Missouri Avenue and north of Rogers Street provide zero buffers and setback to pavement, with very little building setback to 3 � LU a N ES W a d z � �U property line if any at all. The proposed site design offers a 10' setback and 3.5' landscape buffer along the southern property line adjacent to the pond and Rogers Street, and along Missouri Avenue the setback and buffer is proposed at 14'and 10'. The proposed setbacks and buffers associated with this request will provide appropriate buffers for an off - street parking lot with enhanced landscaping meeting or exceeding the existing trend of the area. Section 2 -704 Flexibility Criteria: I. Off - Street Parking 1. Access to the proposed off - street parking lot is provided along Rogers Street with the driveway being located as far from the Missouri Avenue and Rogers Street intersection to minimize any possible congestion at the intersection and to accomplish the desired access by way of a secondary street. A Unity of Title will be provided to address the issues associated with the driveway being partially located the neighboring site. 2. No outdoor lighting is proposed at this time. 3. N/A as the proposed off - street parking lot is not located adjacent to residentially used or zoned property. RMR 10. 10.07 NES #724 Irl L ti a N LU FD LU A �U O z0 CL U PLANNING DEPARTMENT October 21, 2009 CITY OF C LEARWAT E R POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUfH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727)562 -4865 Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services, Inc. PO Box 4948 Clearwater, FL.33758 -4848 RE: FLD2007 -06024 — 1200 Rogers Street Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Ruggiero: On October 20, 2009, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case and revised Findings of Fact #6 on the Staff Report from November 20, 2007 as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.154 acres is located within the Commercial (C) District; 2. The site is currently vacant; 3. The proposal includes reductions to setbacks to pavement; 4. The proposal is to construct a 13 -space parking lot; 5. The lot area is 6,728 square feet, which requires a reduction from the 10,000 square feet required; 6. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development and will provide needed public parking o +vrx Inc each; and 7. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on the parcel at 1200 Rogers Street shall be submitted by November 20, 2010. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to re -apply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code. LA "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE AcnON EMPLOYER" Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III at 727 -562 -4553. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S:\Planning Department \C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Inactive Or Finished Applications \Rogers 1200 - Meek Parking Lot (C) 2007.11 - Approved - SK \Rogers 1200 CDB Time Extension Development Order 10.20.09.Doc MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: A. Scott Kurleman Planner III RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2007 -06024 — 1200 Rogers Street DATE: October 2, 2009 Attached is information related to the request by Renee Ruggiero, Northside Engineering Services, Inc., for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 1200 Rogers Street. On November 20, 2007, the CDB approved a request for an off - street parking lot (13 spaces) for this site. A one -year extension is being requested which would expire on November 20, 2010. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather - related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to the current market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4 -407, the Planning Director has previously granted a one -year time extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments that would significantly affect the project. There are no pending or approved code amendments that would significantly affect the project. Attachments: Letter of Request Time Extension Development Order (October 14, 2008); and Planning Department Staff Report (November 20, 2007) S:\Planning Department \C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Inactive Or Finished Applications \Rogers 1200 - Meek Parking Lot (C) 2007.11 - Approved - SK \Rogers 1200 CDB Time Extension Memorandum For 3.17.09 CDB.Doc September 16, 2009 lqw[[ 1902 ECEYE SO) 4 Mr. Michael Delk Planning irector PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT g SERVICES City of Clearwater Planning Departme t CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2007 -06024 1200 Rogers Street NES: 0724 Dear Mr. Delk: j c Civ, Land Planning. ' Due Diligence Reports,. Re- Zoning, Land Use, Annexation Stormwater Management Utility Design Traffic. Construction Administration We would like to request an additional extension to the Development Order issued for the above referenced property. On November 20, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed and approved our Flexible Development application for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to allow an off - street parking lot in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the lot width along Missouri Avenue from 100 feet to 67 feet, a reduction to the lot width along Rogers Street from 100 feet to 84 feet, a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,728 square feet. Also approved, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C.; and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.39% under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3- 1202G. The Development Order issued on November 26, 2007, provided a deadline of November 20, 2008 to apply for construction permits. On October 14, 2008, an extension to the development order was approved, providing a deadline of November 20, 2009 to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on the parcel. Unfortunately, due to continued extreme downward turn in overall economy, the developer, Mr. John Meek has determined that it is not currently feasible to move forward with construction at this time. This small parking lot with the required amenities, such as landscaping and the retention area became increasingly more expensive to develop, far more then Mr. Meek originally anticipated; although Mr. Meek would like to provide this additional parking lot for his tenants, the Community Center, and himself. With the current economic state Mr. Meek has determined it is not feasible to move forward at this time. 300 S. Belcher Road Clearwater, Florida 33765 tech(a)northsideengi neeri ngservices.com 727.443 •2836 FAX 727.446.8036 We offer our assurance that the developer and his development team have worked diligently to move this project forward; the materials and labor associated with the project have been priced, the construction plans are completed and we stand ready to submit once the economic environment is a little more stable. It is our hope that within the next eight months the economy will reset to allow submission for construction permitting. While awaiting submittal of the documents for construction permit review we have obtained the required SWFWMD approval (Permit # 46033110.000). Please accept this letter as our formal request for an additional extension of one year to apply for construction permits for the Flexible Development approval. Should you require additional clarification or information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this request. tfully, Renee Ruggiero, Project anner Cc: NES File #626 D. Williams J. Meek 2 �I ' � ! ' " ` `/ 1 1 1 V 1' \J L L ' 1 t . 1 \ W i l l Elk Posr OrrlcE Box 4748, Cu utwni'ls, ZIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL. Si:wicrr BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLGAVI:NUI. Cu1ARwAT1[R, FLORIDA 33756 ,Ogg TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 Fax (727).562-4865 PLANNING DHPARTiv ENT October 14, 2008 Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services Inc. P.O. Box 4948 Clearwater, Florida 33758 -4948 RE: FLD2007 -06024 — 1200 Rogers Street Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Ruggiero: On November 20, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for Flexible Development approval for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit an off - street parking lot in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the lot width along Missouri Avenue from 100 feet to 67 feet, a reduction to the lot width along Rogers Street from 100 feet to 84 feet, a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,728 square feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C. and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.39% under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3- 1202G. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (November 20, 2008). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On October 8, 2008, you submitted a request for a one -year time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited a downward turn in the overall economy. In accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a one -year time extension to November 20, 2009, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the building and site improvements on your parcel at 1200 Rogers Street. M B)i j m. Emii i m m[;NT AMU ArnkWI Ivr AC I [ON 1:NIPLO YLa° October 14, 2008 Ruggiero — Page Two In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather - related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Scott Kurleman, Planner III at 727 -562- 4553. Sincerely, Mich , AICP Planning Director S:IPlanning DeparlmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished Applications lRogers 1200 - Meek Parking Lot (C)- Approved - SKIRogers 1200 Time Extension D.a.doc October 8, 2008 Mr. Michael Delk, Planning Director City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2007 -06024 1200 Rogers Street NES 0724 Dear Mr. Delk: Civil Land Planning Due Diligence Reports Re- Zoning, Land Use, Annexation Management ,r Utility Design Traffic -- : -� 'ICon )t�.ttion Administration 9 1, OCT 15 20 i ray. _:,VELOPMENT i Y O= CL.EARWATER We would like to request an extension to the Development Order issued for the above referenced property. On November 20, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed and approved our Flexible Development application for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to allow an off - street parking lot in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction. to the lot width along Missouri Avenue from 100 feet to 67 feet, a reduction to the lot -width along Rogers Street from 100 feet to 84 feet, a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,728 square feet. Also approved, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C.; and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.39% under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3- 1202G. The Development Order issued on November 26, 2007, provided a deadline of November 20, 2008 to apply for construction permits. Due to the extreme downward turn in overall economy, the developer, Mr. John Meek has determined that it is not currently feasible to move forward with construction at this time. This small parking lot with the required amenities, such as landscaping and the retention area became increasingly more expensive to develop, far more then Mr. Meek originally anticipated; although Mr. Meek would like to provide this additional parking lot for his tenants and himself, with the current economic state Mr. Meek has determined it is not feasible to move forward at this time. PO. Box 4948 Clearwater, FL 33758 -4948 tech @northsideengineering.com 727 443 2869 Fax 727 446 8036 We offer our assurance that the developer and his development team have worked diligently to move this project forward; the materials and labor associated with the project have been priced, the construction plans are completed and we stand ready to submit once the economic environment is a little more stable. It is our hope that within the next eight months the economy will begin to turn around and submission for construction may take place. While awaiting submittal of the documents for construction permit review we have obtained the required SWFWMD approval (Permit # 46033110.000). Please accept this letter as our formal request for an extension of one year to apply for construction permits for the Flexible Development approval. Should you require additional clarification or information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this request. Res ectfully, Renee Ruggiero, Project P anner Cc: NES File N. Pelzer J. Meek 2 M October 8, 2008 Mr. Michael Delk, Planning Director City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2007 -06024 1200 Rogers Street Dear Mr. Delk: Civil Land Planning Due Diligence Reports Re- Zoning, Land Use, Annexation Stormwater Management Utility Design Traffic Construction Administration We would like to request an extension to the Development Order issued for the above referenced property. On November 20, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed our Flexible Development approval for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit an off - street parking lot in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the lot width along Missouri Avenue from 100 feet to 67 feet; a reduction to the lot width along Rogers Street from 100 feet to 84 feet, a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,728 square feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C. and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.39% under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3- 1202G. The Development Order issued on November 26, 2007, provided a deadline of November 20, 2008 to apply for construction permits. Due to the extreme downward turn in overall economy the developer, Mr. John Meek has determined that it is not currently feasible to move forward with construction at this time. This small parking lot with the required amenities, such as landscaping and the retention area became increasingly more expensive to develop then he originally anticipated; although Mr. Meek would like to provide this additional parking lot for his tenants and himself, with the current economic state Mr. Meek has determined it is not feasible to move forward at this time. We offer our assurance that the developer and his development team have worked diligently to move this project forward; the project materials and labor have been priced, the construction plans are completed and we stand ready to submit once the economic environment is a little more stable. It is our hope that within the next eight months the economy will begin to turn around and submission for construction may take place. While awaiting submittal of the documents for construction permit review we have obtained the required SWFWMD approval (Permit # 46033110.000). P.O. Box 4948 Clearwater, FL 3375 8-4948 tech@northsideengineering.com 727 443 2869 Fax 727 446 8036 Please accept this letter as our formal request for an extension of one year to apply for construction permits for the Flexible Development approval. Should you require additional clarification or information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this request. Respectfully, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Cc: NES File #626 N. Pelzer J. Meek 06/0412007 08:55 72744680 ?6 NORTHSIDE ENG SVCS PAGE 04104 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This _letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee (agent Name) with Nortbside Fnglineering Serulces, Inc. to act as an agent for John H. Meek, Jr. (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at Northeast corner of Missouri Ave. & Rogers St. (Property Location) PINFLLAS County, State of FLORIDA_ {Sig ture of Pr perty Ow 1211 Court St Address of Property Owner Clearwater, FL 33756 City /State /Zip Code , John H. Meek, Jr. Print Name of Property Owner Owner Title (727) 446 -5051 Telephone Number State of __LL The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this day ( County of U! �- of !✓ u�-e 20_0 by � &f'DYI � ' _ + as who is personally known to me or who has produced :a++�+ +,,; RAMONA1.AUTRY a identification and who did (did not) take an oath, Y Pu >�i�i .•• • :�� Notary Public - Florida S my Commission # DD 64907:4 76 Z Expires: March 11, 2011 vQ°, Bonded by Western Surety Coma C II Notary Public (Si nature) z Commission # �a�Q' o 0 (SEAL ABOVE) tu `' T�� (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) 2 099 119 � z o: Uj �a �U Z U. 20 CLn. WD •1 j - 5/93 This Warranty Deed INST # 97- 377464 DEC 30, 1997 5:06PM Made this 24th day of December A.D. 19 97 by GEORGE W. ELY and, W. SUE 'ELY, husband and PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. wife OFF.REC.BK 9948 PG 2285 creinaffer called the grantor,, to ?CO71 55? AL !: 30 !911' IE:4E:Or JOHN H. MEEK,;.'JR, ,,.. G! OED - 115' FECGnGING 1 i;.OG OGC sTAry fn ?li 3 11364.00 whose post office address is:'; t l t20tl' O'T "Vu --lT TOTAL: 11370.00 Cil'C AIT.TEliDERED: 5370.00 CHANGE: SAO hereinafter calleti. -the grantee: (Wheh�ver used herein the term 'gramor' anal 'gramme include all the parties to this iruimmen: and Om heirs. Icgal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successon and assigns of cagtootions) �YitnCSseth, that the grantor. for and in consideration of the sum of S 10 .00 and other yaleable .considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, relcascs.,.,ccnvcysand confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in PINELLAS County, Florida, viz: Lwi— 3.Q33, 31A and 31B, Block R, HIBISCUS GARDENS, according to the, plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 14, Pages 55 through 59, ,,.PuYlic Records of Pinellas County, Florida, Less the West 20 feet, thereof for Street. l SUBJECT TO covenants, restrictions, easements of record and taxes for I the current year. ; Parcel Identification Number: 15/29/15/38574/018 /0301 Togetherwidn all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfullyscized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 19 97 In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: /46", . Z . Z l.s hto�u +te xa GEORG VjL ELY 1 � �- W. SUE ELY cxu, --- n ni State of F1 rida / County of ✓ Q g The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 23RD day of December 19 97 by GEORGE W. ELY and W. SUE ELY, husband and wife j who is personalty know'n,to me or who has produced DRIVER'S LICENSES as identification and who DID NOT take an oath. Print•Namc. �,O�s� -� .fjjL,��C>✓ wry Public PREPARED BY: JANELLE RRIS My Commission Expires: RECORD & RETURN TO: First American Title Insurance Company 1527 Highland Avenue South Clearwater, Florida 33756 File No: 95407 -2 -7 t F' its 1JY COMMISSgN / CC g5159a I • E EXPIRES: June t0.:W I �`•2.�;,1;• °•'� Batled ThNllata7 Pu64c tYWnnhen� 7a� I,— 0 0 RV In $JO d o� Z 0 Z g CL. Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727- 562- 4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION v SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 03/29/2006) — PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGE14T INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: ?Z% CELL NUMBER: 7Zi jr --- ........ - ------- - -_- - -- t _ i1'. � C' FAX NUMBER: -12-7 E -MAIL ADDRESS:( a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or Oeyploped on the parcel proposed for the development. _ o �< N OR OcWC �-- ? O b. The design, character, location and /or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program all demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landsca U standards. , X: Clw Applicationsk2006 Applications lComprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc Page 1 of 2 2. LIGHTING: Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. J) 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 5 - -_ -- �Z . I 4. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and phot ra the property described in this application. ............ ......... ......._....._...._._......... .... _____........_._.__..........._............._....._...._..._........._._........ ........... ......__.._._._...._........... Si nature of property owner or representative f—. � W =0 Cl � q STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS 9% W °"1 � Q ern to and subscribed before me this _� day of 0 � F— z U. IV/ Alf A.D. 20 fa / to me and /or by Z who is personally known has 90 produced a. as identification. \ Notary public, ' ' - - My commission expires: . /li / /CJ X:0w Applications 12006 Applications lComprehensive Landscape Program Page 2 of 2 �'0Y Pu°� DOREEN A, WII_ AMS MY COMMISSION # DD 576718 14 oFEV °4 EXPIRES: October 14,2010 IoGM 4_un7ARY FL Notary Discount Assoc. Co, 1 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM NARRATIVE Case Number: Project Address: NES Project: FLD2007 -06024 1200 Rogers Street #0724 Request: Reductions to the required landscape buffers through a Comprehensive Landscape Application to allow a 10' landscape buffer where 15' is required along the western property line, 3.5' landscape buffer where 10' is required along the southern property line adjacent to the pond and to allow 0' landscape buffer along the east property line where 5' is required. Also a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.5% pursuant to Section 3- 1.202.G 1. Architectural Theme: a. N/A b. To provide a landscape plan that is demonstrably more attractive the following are some of the measures taken: i. The landscape design contemplates three tiers of plantings adjacent to Missouri Avenue; providing multiple layers of plantings to enhance the streetscape along this corridor. ii. Four types of trees are proposed which will provide visual enhancement and buffering to this currently unattractive vacant parcel of land. 2. Lighting: - No outdoor lighting is proposed at this time and any future proposed light will meet required code. 3. Community Character: The proposed installation of over 200 new plantings consisting of 7 different varieties will provide immediate visual rewards to the vicinity and community. Additionally, the proposed plan provides landscaping that is tolerant to the Florida environment. Although the landscape buffer located along Rogers Street provides 3.50' of planting area due to the pond; the area will provide 10' of green space between the pavement and southern property line meeting the spirit of the code by providing a 10' green yard. The proposed plan will most certainly enhance and improve the community character. 4. Property Values: The quality of the proposed plantings and the professional landscape design will offer upgraded and positive value to the immediate vicinity. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan: N/A Revised 8.28.07 RMR/= NES #724 Meek Parking Lot NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 1 rd `Clearwater �1� - 0. Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: _ -W7 — RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill redevelopment Project (Revised 10/25/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S) List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: John H. Meek, Jr 1211 Court St, Clearwater, FL 33756 727 - 446 -5051 CELL NUMBER: John H. Meek, Jr Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland St., #930, Clearwater, FL 33755 727 - 443 -2869 FAX NUMBER: 727- 446 -8036 727 - 235 -8475 E -MAIL ADDRESS: renee @northsideengineering.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED USE(S): Missouri & Rogers Parking Lot PROJECT VALUATION: $,000.00 1200 Rogers St 15- 29 -15- 38574- 018 -0301 0.154 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): &—,4-8�4 See attached survey Free st DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) anding Parking Lot See attached. RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 1 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ( ©R), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ ND1 (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See attached 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See attached 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See attached 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See attached 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See attached 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See attached ORIGINAL SEP 0 4 2007 Page 2 of 8 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) i Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See attached 2. The development or redevelopment will be .consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See attached 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See attached 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. See attached 5. . The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. See attached 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See attached ORIGINAi RECEIVED SEP 0 4 2007 Page 3 of 8 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; • Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; • All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; • Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFV\/MD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable l ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) —please design around the existing trees; TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;. PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; i PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORIGME RECENED SEP 0 4 2007 " PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 4 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) V/ 71ndex PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; 0 Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and VWi��'� "' ~w _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED _ Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and T / Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. u+' REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/ X 11); N �_ OR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; ORIGINAL All open space areas; RECEIVED Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); SEP 0 4 1007 Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Structural overhangs; Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) W/ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): / All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required _ tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; ,Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including Instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and Jprotective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. d REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2X 11); I/ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; ,, All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8'/ X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) Ko�rvv 'q aiL� vtSZ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) )'\ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). Reduced signage proposal (8'/ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ORIGINAL SEP 0 4 2007 Page 6 of 8 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) 0 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ■ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a " Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. C3 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required.��' �,,f -✓'� CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. El Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. L---'CAUTION Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required.e�,r, — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this appli ion are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge ifid authorize City representatives to visit and photogr4) the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELL4S Sw to and subscribed before me this �� day of � U 1�U �t.� s. A.D. 20 0 —T IQ-me; as re of property owner or representativOR E � ei eRV M SEP 0 4 200 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 7 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER 11,41, oti ^Ry pVe� JEFFREY IZZO j4 Z. Notary Public- State of Flodda « ; • :My Commission. Expires Nov 14, 2009 Commission # DD 450540 Bonded By National Notary Assn. 06/04/2007 08 :55 7274468036 NORTHSIDE ENG SVrq PAGE 01/04 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: John H, Meek, Jr. 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (addrees or general location): 15/29/15/385 74/418/0301 3. That this property constitutes the property forwhich a request for a: (describe request) Pao; lsi,ny Lot 4, That the undersigned (has /have) appointed and (does /do) appoint: Roush Ghovaeo, Noxthside Engineexing Services, Inc. as (hts/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5, That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6_ That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; . 7, That (I /we), the unde igned author hereby cerffy that the foregoing is true and correct. Pro erty Owner Property Owner t l S Property Owner Property wner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELL.AS before me the undersigned, an officerduly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this �! ��- _ day of C. f ` Ly" QK) 0 personally appeared ;— Q f 1 (i who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. "," "11� RAMONA E. AUTRY r°`.''r ��'B` Notary Public - Florida ; = My Commission # DD 6490761 M� °� Expires: March 11, 201t �,_ 'm i ;OF F °� Bonded by Western Surety Company Notary Public Signature My Commission Expires; 1---L,C) 1 I ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 04 2007 Pagc 7 of 7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 06/04/2007 08:55 7274468036 NORTHSIDE ENG SVCS LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter will serve as authorization for Hou_sh Gh©waee (agent Name) . with NdfOside Engineering Services, Inc. to act as an agent for John H. Meek, Jr. (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the.property generally located at Northeast corner o #Missouri Ave. & Rogers St. (Property Location) PINE.LLAS County, State of FLORIDA_. vi ;Sig tore of Pr pert3r Ow e 1211 Court St Address of Property Owner Clearwater, FL 33756 City /State /Zip Code John H. Meek, Jr. Print Name of Property. Owner Owner Title (727) 446 -5051 Telephone Number PAGE 04;'04 State of F L The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this day County of )(A " of 20 _0, by I;:q ! N . ` ' , as who is personally known to me or who has produced RAMONAE.AUTRY a identification and who did (did not) take an oath, Notary Public - Florida My Commission # DD 649076 Expires: March 11, 2011 gwded by Western Surety Corn a n x� Notary Public (Si nature) Commission # (SEAL ABOVE) 1 `�'�� (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 0 4 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER WD-1 1 5193 I This Warranty Deed INST it 97- 377464 DEC 30, 1997 5:06PM Made this 24th day of December A.D. 19 97 by GEORGE W. ELY and•*W. StTE'ELY, husband and PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. wife OFF. REC. 13K 9948 PG 2285 cleinafter called the grant MC 155_ AL 2-30 -!91' 16:46:06 JOHN H. MEEK,;" JR-�•,, 0! NO- I_y R£CGSDING 1 56.00 GGC STOP- DR 215 3 5364,0: whose post office adAmss is:' .� a l 1 (2pU_I77 TOTAL: 1370.00 CiIEC AIT.T£NDEREDt 5370.00 UANGE: S.00 rf L • 31 �57P hereinafter called the grantee: t%Yheiic r used herein the tern •grantor' and 'grantee* include all the parties to this imirumen: ant the heirs, legal repmenutivcs and assigns of individuals• and the succcsson and assigns of corpantiotu) /Witnesseth, that the grantor. for and in consideration of the sum of S 10.00 and other valuable. Considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases,., conveystind confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in PINELLAS County, Florida. viz: Lo.ta;3.Qg, 31A and 31B, Block R, HIBISCUS GARDENS, according to the,plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 14, Pages 55 through 59, 1 %P41*c Records of Pinellas County, Florida, Less the West 20 €get'thereof for Street. '- SUBJECT TO covenants, restrictions, easements of record and taxes for toe current year. Parcel Identification Number: 15/29/15/38574/018 /0301 Togetherwith all the tenements, hcrcditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of A persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 19 97 In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: ,n t„TorG ,t¢ nr. Lts. s. -x p•e LG'� lS — & A GEORG . ELY n °"° ""° W: SUE ELY n �. .; —. n State of Fl rids County of The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 23RD day of December 19 97 by GEORGE W. ELY and W. SUE ELY, husband and wife ORIGINA% who is personally known to me or tcl:o has produced DRIVER'S LICENSES. as identification RECEIVED and who DID NOT take an oath. SEP 0 4 2007 MNIN CDEPARTMENT �Pnn •Name:,p�� j�` -�/Cj� LEARWATER ry Puhlic PREPARED BY: JANELLE RRIS sty Commission Expires: RECORD & RETURN TO: s First American Title Insurance Company r „; 6yapf.eesi� 1527 Highland Avenue South r,: rfs i.i MY C0MA715SgHt CC 6” Clearwater, Florida 33756 I t�wes:dwwto -mgt { File No: 9 5407 -2 -7 kniadfiNHonn Pale U*Wlbn 7a+� August 28, 2007 Exhibit "A" to Flexible Development Level Two - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project 1200 Rogers Street FLD2007 -06024 NES Project #724 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Flexible development approval to construct an off - street parking lot as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with reductions to the following: Lot Width: West (along Missouri): South (along Rogers): Lot Area: Setbacks (all to pavement): North: Reqd: 10' South: Reqd: 25' West: Reqd: 25' East: Reqd: 10' Reqd: 100' Reqst: 67' Reqd: 100' Reqst: 84' Reqd: 10,000 sq ft. Reqst: 6,728 sq ft Reqst: 5' Reqst: 10' Reqst: 14' Reqst: 0' Also, reductions to the required landscape buffers through a Comprehensive Landscape Application to allow a 14' landscape buffer where 15' is required along the western property line, to 3.5' landscape buffer where 10' is required along the southern property line adjacent to the pond and to allow 0' landscape buffer along the east property line where 5' is required. Also, a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.50% pursuant to Section 3- 1202.G (See Landscape Narrative).` GENERAL APPLICABLE CRITERIA (Code Section 3- 913.A) 1. The proposal contemplates approval of an off - street parking lot; the design therefore, will be similar or less than the scale, bulk, coverage, density of the surrounding sites. 2. Upon completion, the proposed off - street parking lot and subsequent improvements will increase the value of the subject site and the adjoining site to the east, thereby providing a positive influence on the surrounding property values. The proposed off- street parking lot will offer improved drainage, parking and drive surfaces; an improved access point and new landscaping. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 0 4 2007 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER All of which will further promote development and investment in the area and along this main corridor. 3. No health or safety concerns are anticipated with the proposed development as the site design adheres to all required visibility triangles, provides responsible site drainage and further provides nicely landscaped yards along the street. 4. The proposed off - street parking lot will minimize traffic congestion by providing access to the site from a secondary street (Rogers Street) rather than Missouri Avenue. The access provides improved curb cuts and aprons with appropriate radii. 5. The proposed improvements to the site will be consistent with the surrounding character; providing an enhanced streetscape and providing . further encouragement for redevelopment in the area. The development of the off - street parking lot is a permissible use within the Commercial District. 6. No additional adverse effects relating to visual, acoustic olfactory or hours of operation issues will be created by the proposed development. No visual obstructions are being created with the proposal and the development plan will improve the existing situation of unimproved parking surfaces. The hours of operation for this off - street parking lot will mirror the operating hours of the neighboring site to the east for which the parking lot will serve, Monday through Friday from 8 am to 5 pm. Section 2 -704 Flexibility Criteria: C. Comprehensive infill redevelopment project 1. The site consists of three substandard lots (each 25' in width). With the massing of three lots, in this particular situation, the end product results in the ability to lay out only 13 parking spaces. This site would be impractical to develop without deviations due to the minimal land area available even with the massing proposed. Therefore, we believe this proposed development is the most reasonable use for the site due to the minimal land area available even with the massing of three lots. 2. Site access will be provided from the commercial secondary street (Rogers Street) in lieu of along Missouri Avenue which is in keeping with the .goals and policies outlined within the Comprehensive Plan. Off - Street Parking Lots are an allowable use with the Commercial District of the Land Development Code. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 04 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEAs WATER 3. The proposed development of the site as an off - street parking lot will not impede the improvements of the surrounding properties; the proposed improvements will enhance the normal and orderly development of the surrounding properties. 4. By providing site improvements such as: proper parking surfaces, appropriate and responsible drainage; improved landscaping and appropriate site access, detrimental impacts on the adjoining properties are not anticipated. 5. Off- street parking lots are a permissible use within the Commercial district as a minimum standard and will provide support to a local business by providing additional parking for customers and employees. 6. a. The proposed development of the site as an off - street parking lot will not impede the improvements of the surrounding properties; the proposed improvements will enhance the normal and orderly development of the surrounding properties. b. There are no specific applicable design guidelines for this area of the City. Through this application, we are proposing improvements to the site and are working within the flexibility development guidelines. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed parking lot are compatible with the commercial character of the area. d. The majority of the items below are intended to address a development proposal inclusive of a building; this proposal contemplates development of an off - street parking lot and therefore many of the following items do not apply: i. N/A ii. N/A iii. A variety of colors, textures and heights will be provided through the landscape design. The landscaping will greatly enhance this vacant and currently unattractive site. iv. N/A v. N/A vi. N/A e. The proposed setbacks and buffers are similar and in most cases more than the surrounding developments; the adjacent properties to the east provide zero setbacks from pavement to the street as parking is designed for direct back out on to the street; the three sites east of the subject site also provide little setback to the rear (approx. 5') and side yards (approx. 0') to building. The property to the north appears to provide zero buffers and setbacks to pavement along the north, west and southern property lines. Further, the two sites west of our site, across Missouri Avenue and north of Rogers Street provide zero buffers and setback to pavement, with very little building setback to 3 ®RIGIN4 RECFIWD -SEP 0 4 2007 "TANNING DEPARWENT CITY OF CLEOWATFR property line if any at all. The proposed site design offers a 10' setback and 3.5' landscape buffer along the southern property line adjacent to the pond and Rogers Street, and along Missouri Avenue the setback and buffer is proposed at 14'. The proposed setbacks and buffers associated with this request will provide appropriate buffers for an off - street parking lot with enhanced landscaping meeting or exceeding the existing trend of the area. Section 2 -704 Flexibility Criteria: I. Off - Street Parking 1. Access to the proposed off - street parking lot is provided along Rogers Street with the driveway being located as far from the Missouri Avenue and Rogers Street intersection to minimize any possible congestion at the intersection and to accomplish the desired access by way of a secondary street. A Unity of Title will be provided to address the issues associated with the driveway being partially located the neighboring site. 2. No outdoor lighting is proposed at this time. 3. N/A as the proposed off - street parking lot is not located adjacent to residentially used or zoned property. RMR 8 -28 -07 NES #724 ®RIGIfVA6.. RECEIVED SEP 0 4 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4 N LL Planning Department Cleamater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727- 562 -4567 Fax: 727- 562 -4865 e/ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION Q' SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 03/29/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGE14T INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: (7ZJ71 CELL NUMBER: (✓ �� ... ._.__�..__.._._ ................ _. -- ._.._.. o7 _..v - �1 FAX NUMBER: ?) - g E -MAIL ADDRESS: 4'?.!/If�(7l�(t�;nn a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed cr ftVloped on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and /or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. ORIGINAL RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMFNt CITY OF CLEARWATER - X:10w Applications12006ApplicationslComprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc Page 1 of 2 *" 2. LIs GHTING: Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and phot ra the property described in this application. ............ . ... ........... _ ........................................................................................... ...._....._.... _ ...... _ ..... _ ...... ... ..._ ......... .................. Si nature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEL AS SWorn to and subscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 to me and /or by -:� J' c`- who is personally known has produced as identification. \ Notary public, ' ' - - My commission expires:: /l� ®R(GINAL SEP 04 2007 X: IClwApplications12006Applicationsl �ghensive Landscape Program Pa rp DEPARTMENT F CLEARWATER No"r � DOREEN A, WILLIAMS MY COMMISSION # DD 676716 �� aF Fvoa EXPIRES: October 14, 2010 iOG— luinrARY FL Notary Discount Assoc. Co. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM NARRATIVE Case Number: Project Address: NES Project: FLD2007 -06024 1200 Rogers Street #0724 Request: Reductions to the required landscape buffers through a Comprehensive Landscape Application to allow a 14' landscape buffer where 15' is required along the western property line, a 3.5' landscape buffer where 10' is required along the southern property line adjacent to the pond and to allow 0' landscape buffer along the east property line where 5' is required. Also a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.5% pursuant to Section 3- 1202.G 1. Architectural Theme: a. N/A b. To provide a landscape plan that is demonstrably more attractive the following are some of the measures taken: i. The landscape design contemplates three tiers of plantings adjacent to Missouri Avenue; providing multiple layers of plantings to enhance the streetscape along this corridor. H. Four types of trees are proposed which will provide visual enhancement and buffering to this currently unattractive vacant parcel of land. 2. Lighting: No outdoor lighting is proposed at this time and any future proposed light will meet required code. 3. Community Character: The proposed installation of over 200 new plantings consisting of 7 different varieties will provide immediate visual rewards to the vicinity and community. Additionally, the proposed plan provides landscaping that is tolerant to the Florida environment. Although the landscape buffer located along Rogers Street provides 3.50' of planting area due to the pond; the area will provide 10' of green space between the pavement and southern property line meeting the spirit of the code by providing a 10' green yard. The proposed plan will most certainly enhance and improve the community character. 4. Property Values: The quality of the proposed plantings and the professional landscape design will offer upgraded and positive value to the immediate vicinity. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan: N/A Revised 8.28.07 RMR/rmr ORIGINAL_ NES 4724 (2ECENEL? Meek Parking Lot NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. SEP 04 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 +J COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM NARRATIVE Case Number: Project Address: NES Project: FLD2007 -06024 1200 Rogers Street #0724 Request: Reductions to the required landscape buffers through a Comprehensive Landscape Application to allow a 14' landscape buffer where 15' is required along the western property line, a 3.5' landscape buffer where 10' is required along the southern property line adjacent to the pond and to allow 0' landscape buffer along the east property line where 5' is required. Also a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.5% pursuant to Section 3- 1202.G 1. Architectural Theme: a. N/A b. To provide a landscape plan that is demonstrably more attractive the following are some of the measures taken: i. The landscape design contemplates three tiers of plantings adjacent to Missouri Avenue; providing multiple layers of plantings to enhance the streetscape along this corridor. . H. Four types of trees are proposed which will provide visual enhancement and buffering to this currently unattractive vacant parcel of land. 2. Lighting: No outdoor lighting is proposed at this time and any future proposed light will meet required code. 3. Community Character: The proposed installation of over 200 new plantings consisting of 7 different varieties will provide immediate visual rewards to the vicinity and community. Additionally, the proposed plan provides landscaping that is tolerant to the Florida environment. Although the landscape buffer located along Rogers Street provides 3.50' of planting area due to the pond; the area will provide 10' of green space between the pavement and southern property line meeting the spirit of the code by providing a 10' green yard. The proposed plan will most certainly enhance and improve the community character. 4. Property Values: The quality of the proposed plantings and the professional landscape design will offer upgraded and positive value to the immediate vicinity. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan: N/A Revised 8.28.07 RMR/rmr NES #724 Meek Parking Lot NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 0 4 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 Cie arwater 0. Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: F"Z -097 - O(oQZ+ RECEIVED BY (staff initials : 5 DATE RECEIVED: _.2 -D * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 10/25/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: John H. Meek, Jr 1211 Court St, Clearwater, FL 33756 727 - 446 -5051 CELL NUMBER: John H. Meek, Jr Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland St., #930, Clearwater, FL 33755 727 - 443 -2869 FAX NUMBER: 727- 446 -8036 727 - 235 -8475 E -MAIL ADDRESS: renee@northsideengineering.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: Missouri & Rogers Parking Lot PROJECT VALUATION: $ 'F0, 000.00 STREET ADDRESS 1200 Rogers St PARCELNUMBER(S): 15- 29 -15- 38574 - 018 -0301 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0.154 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 6,988.2 6,7A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached survev PROPOSED USE(S): Free st DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of Parkina Lot See attached. ORIGIML CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (4R), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO' v (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. 11 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See attached 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See attached 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See attached 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See attached 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See attached 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See attached JLIsN 27 7007 Page 2 of 8 PLANNiNG,DEPMTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See attached 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See attached 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See attached 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. See attached 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. See attached 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances bg�e��bu��p buildings. See attached �Jj G NAL. M 27 2001 Page 3 of 8 PLMNiNG DEfMTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) j SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; THE S RV EY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; TREE INNVVEN ORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; Of GRADING PLAN, as applicable; PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORIG1M W n JUN 27 2007 PLANNINGD€PART )ENT Page 4 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) SIT 1PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): �V Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and WDTe (,� ru" _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. V SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: _? P—L S_� 0. 1 1 EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED _ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and _ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/ X 11); OR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); sOa1lc7I�vrt� Streets and drives (dimensioned); �m Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); SUN 2 % 2007 Structural overhangs; Page 5 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) 4Y LAI kAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abuttin Drainage and re • luding swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree surrey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); I Irrigation notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8%X 11); W/ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) 4KBUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8 % X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) WQ/ 54 C( � 4vL All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). Reduced signage proposal (8% X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. J_'N 27 2007 Page 6 of 8 PLANNINGMMMENt CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL 1VED K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) PLANNIM 0 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: CI1YOF ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ❑ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. 111� Y-' Z1�5 1,,m- 10(N I C 4�7�7N — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ❑ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. vc?* 0,\"� CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELL4S in this appli ion are true and accurate to the best of my Sw to and subscribed before me this day of knowledge d authorize City representatives to visit and UK) �i A.D. 20 O - by photogr the property described in this application. o is personall .. ow� produ d aside tification. Sig re of property owner or representative a: ry u ic, My comm ssion p s: I �L JEFFREYIZZO Notary Public - State of Florida * • My Commission Expires Nov 14, 2009 Page 7 of 8 ;� Commission # DD 450540 okoF r��;�`•, " " "" Bonded By National Notary Assn. 06/04/2007 08:55 ♦ 1 7274468036 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: John H. Meek, Jr. NORTHSIDE ENG SVCS 2. That (I amAive are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 15/29/15/38579! /018/0301 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) PAGE 03/04 Parking Lot _ 4, That the undersigned (hasthave) appointed and (does /do) appoint Roush Ghovaer_, Noxthside Engineering Services, Inc. as (his/thelr) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to Induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (Ilwe), the unde igned authorl hereby ce 'fy that the foregoing is true and correct. Pro erty Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this IA_._ day of aOO-I personally appeared M o h n H • ft) e e L —Te— who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. AV p. RAMONA E. AUTRY . .� Notary Public - Florida a ; : My Commission # DD 649016 j� 7 ,�a� Expires: March 11, 2011 q4� OF f °;* Sw*d by Western Surety Company Notary Public Signature My Commission Expires: ,e o JUN 2 7 2007 Rao 7 of 7 ! Id11v1Y %*;)WMTMEN1 eny OF OLEARINATER )�Z 31e: .JUN 27 2007 PLANN1N%0L*K<TWN1 CITY M CLEARWATER • WD-1 1 503 This Warranty Deed INST # 97- 377464 DEC 30, 1997 5:06PM Made this 24th day of D.eceinber A.D. 19 97 by GEORGE W. ELY and•W. SUE ELY, husband and PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. Wife OFF.REC.BK 9948 PG 2285 crcinafter called the grmlbr,, to ?COSS15_ AL !:-30-M7 16:46:06 JOHN H. MEEK,; "JR�.., G! DED u' 6ECGSD14 1 DOC STAN - PEI' 3 ik4,Oc whose post office addrbss is:- .aa 11 TOTAL: 13 %0.00 LUIC A.M.TEliDEnED: 5370,00 ChANGE: S. 00 fLi hereinafter called'* grantee: in enBver used herrin the term 'gramus' and "gnnud include all the parties to this immsmen: ant dte ' hero, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the succason and assigns of cogsorainm). /Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of S 10.00 and other �aluab'le �bnsideraiions, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged; hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, relcascs,,.conVgys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in PINELLAS County, Florida, viz: Lot, , -1. 3, 31A and 31B, Block R, HIBISCUS GARDENS, according to `the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 14, Pages 55 through 59, Pi%blic Records of Pinellas County, Florida, Less the West 20 ; feet thereof for Street. '61BJECT TO covenants, restrictions, easements of record and taxes for j ` -tile current ear. Y t ........ _ aJ Parcel Identification Number: 15/29/15/38574 /018/0301 Together withal I the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywiseappertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in (cc simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good fight and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the tine to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, l9 97 In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and scaled these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: / l.,4 n. n hln« ,ta ,tar. - - (,u .., .: s , -�• p: e t/ "° A GEORGY ELY is W.- SUE ELY t State of Frlprida County of � Thu foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 23RD day of December 19 97 by GEORGE W. ELY and W. SUE ELY, husband and wife whu is personally known to me or who has produced DRIVER'S LICENSES as identification and who DID NOT take an oath. �ury Public PREPARED BY: JANELLE RRIS- My Commission Expires. RECORD & RETURN TO: First American Title Insurance Company 1527 Highland Avenue South Clearwater, Florida 33756 File No:. 95407 -2 -7 i MY COMMISSION 0 cc It" •, ,f; EXPIRES: JUN 10.:001 Yea: !landed Thal Ibtary hbbc Isthnsstiers j . V, I Planning Department ° 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 C earwater Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 6d/ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION U/ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 03/29/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME: �1 b�yt A. MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: /72"7 CELL NUMBER: /i27 _.....1._._.�, -. ---...__.._........ .. .........................__..__ 1,,.__ ._......_..............- . -. -. -. -_ ........................... _ ............................. _..__. — —... PROPERTY OWNER(S): _ y o4vI_ __ List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: - ..........t q.3.0 ......... f ------ 3. 3_ 7� ............. _ ........... _._ ...... _ ... _ _ .................. ..... _........... PHONE NUMBER: Z7� yi �'a�� t FAX NUMBER: 7 a-7) �I �% - SO3 �o CELL NUMBER: - 7 E -MAIL ADDRESS: r vie 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or gevAeloped on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and /or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. A wit • '� �i/ "UN 2 % X:IClw Applicationsk2006 ApplicationslComprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc C11YOF CLEARWATER Page 1 of 2 e.' '' 2. LIGHTING: i Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. <�P-f 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. ap- Gi.QiP� 0 4. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. OR[C-7 4I_ W JJJ , 4 42 17 2 PLANNINta %ft —ash - 5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: CITY OF CLEARWATER The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. S169_ 1-1;M4AU THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and phot r the property described in this application. Si nature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINE r s S e rn to and subscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 7 7 to me and /or by 272(72W zS�� I— , who is personally known has produced as identification. notary PuuuL;, My commission expires: X:IClw Applications12006 ApplicationslComprehensive Landscape Program Page 2 of 2 �,or' 4111;� DOREEN A, WILUAAAS MY COMMISSION # DD 576718 1"'tbr ie EXPIRES: October 14, 2010 iQam,.- NnTARY FL Notary Discount Assoc. Co. 4' COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM NARRATIVE Project Address: 1200 Rogers Street NES Project: #0724 Request: Reductions to the required landscape buffers through a Comprehensive Landscape Application allowing a zero buffer along the east property line where pavement is at a zero setback (portion of east yard will provide a 9' buffer where permissible) where 5' is required; to allow 10' and 9' landscape. buffer where 15' is required along the western property line and to allow a 5' landscape buffer where 10' is required along the southern property line adjacent 'to the pond pursuant to Section 3- 1202. G 1. Architectural Theme: a. N/A b. To provide a landscape plan that is demonstrably more attractive the following are some of the measures taken: i. The landscape design contemplates three tiers of plantings adjacent to Missouri Avenue; providing multiple layers of plantings to enhance the existing streetscape along this corridor. ii. Four types of trees are proposed which will provide substantial visual enhancement and buffering to this currently unattractive vacant parcel of land. 2. Lighting: No outdoor lighting is proposed at this time and any future proposed light will meet required code. 3. Community Character: The proposed installation of over 200 new plantings consisting of 7 different varieties will provide immediate visual rewards to the vicinity and community. Additionally, the proposed plan provides landscaping that is tolerant to the Florida environment. 4. 5. Property Values: The quality of the proposed plantings and the professional landscape design will offer upgraded and positive value to the immediate vicinity. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan: N/A 6.26.07 RMR/rmr NES 724 NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC, ORIGINAL fisaly ; JUN 27 2001 PLMNiNG{3EfMTMENi CITY OF CLEARWATER r SpLa 6/28/2007 Receipt #: 1200700000000005608 11:03:34AM p Date: 06/28/2007 r Line Items: FLD2007 -06024 Payments: Method Payer 04 Flexible Commercial Check JOHN H MEEK JR 010- 341262 Line Item Total: Initials Check No Confirm No. How Received R_D 3784 In Person Payment Total: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of I 1,205.00 $1,205.00 Amount Paid 1,205.00 $1,205.00 ORIGINAL Wo MIM JUN 27 2007 P"tv4G,DL*A cTiiilW CHV of cLERWAUR cReceipt.rpt i CDB Meeting Date: November 20, 2007 �, 9 /� �j � r/�� Case Number: FLD2007 -06024 V Agenda Item: E3 Owner: John H. Meek, Jr CL �D Applicant: John H. Meek, Jr Representative: Northside.En ing eering Services, Incorporated Address: 1200 Rogers Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelop- ment Project to permit an off - street parking lot in the Commercial (C) Dis- trict with a reduction to the lot width along Missouri Avenue from 100 feet to 67 feet, a reduction to the lot width along Rogers Street from 100 feet to 84 feet, a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,728 square feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C. and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.39% under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Pro- gram per Section 3- 1202.G. EXISTING ZONING/ Commercial (C) District LAND USE: Commercial General (CG) PROPERTY SIZE: 0.154 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant Lot Proposed Use: Off- Street Parking Lot ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Commercial District; Office LAND USES: East: Commercial District; Office/Retail Sales and Services South: Commercial District; Restaurant West: Commercial District; Vehicle Service CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is an amalgamation of Commercial and Office uses. Directly to the south is a McDonald's restaurant, directly to the north Staff Report — Community Development Board — November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007 -06024 Page 1 of 7 • ! is an orthodontia office, directly to the west across Missouri Avenue is Don Olson Tire and Auto Center and directly to the east is an office /retail sales use owned by the applicant. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.154 acres is located on the east side of Missouri Avenue at the northeast corner of Rogers Street and Missouri Avenue. The site is an irregularly shaped corner lot with approximate dimensions of 90 feet by 75 feet. The site is currently a vacant lot. Development Proposal: The proposal includes constructing a surface parking area for 13 vehicles. This off - street parking area will be used by the neighboring site to the east which has business hours of 8 am to 5 pm Monday thru Friday. All ingress and egress to the parking lot will be from Rogers Street. Flexibility Criteria: Pursuant to Section 2- 704.I. of the Community Development Code access to and from the parking lot shall be based on the size and design of the lot and approved by the ' Community Development Coordinator. Staff has determined that the requirement to have the two properties joined with a Unity of Title satisfies the criteria. Section 2- 704.I. additionally require that all outdoor lighting be designed and located so that no light fixtures cast light directly onto adjacent land and that the parking lot is screened with a wall or fence if it is adjacent to residentially used or zoned property. The proposed parking lot has no lighting associated with it nor is it adjacent to residentially used or zoned property. Minimum Lot Area and Width: The proposal includes a request for a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,728 square feet, a reduction to the lot width along Missouri Avenue from 100 feet to 67 feet and a reduction to the lot width along Rogers Street from 100 feet to 84 feet. As the property is currently three small vacant lots combined into one with a structure on the adjacent property to the east, there is limited opportunity gain additional property to meet the criteria; thus the request. Setbacks: The Community Development Code requires front setbacks of 25 feet and side setbacks of 10 feet as this is a corner lot. The proposal includes a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet. The proposed parking lot locates the pavement of the parking lot 10 feet to 14 feet from the front (west) property line, 10 feet from the front (south) property line and five feet from the side (north) property line. There will be a zero setback on the side (east) property line. These proposed front and side setbacks exceed or are consistent with the setbacks of most uses on adjacent and surrounding properties. The adjacent property to the east will be removing two non - conforming back out parking spaces with this development proposal. The proposed parking lot is compatible with the surrounding development and will provide needed parking. With the removal of two non - conforming parking spaces that back into the rights -of -way, coupled with the proposed front setbacks, the site will have an enhanced streetscape. A retention pond is proposed in the southwest corner of the parking lot adjacent to the rights -of -way. Landscaping_ Pursuant to Section 3- 1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code, this site is required a 15 foot wide landscape buffer along Missouri Avenue, a 10 foot wide landscape buffer along Rogers Street, a five foot landscape buffer on the north side and a five foot landscape buffer on the east side. Buffers are to be planted with one (1) tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage is required. The proposal includes a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along Missouri Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet for Staff Report — Community Development Board — November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007 -06024 Page 2 of 7 approximately half the length with the remainder at 14 feet and a reduction to east landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet (adjacent to the applicant owned structure). All other buffers meet code requirements. Section 3- 1202.E.1 of the Code requires the provision of 10 percent of the vehicular use area in interior landscaping. The proposal includes a reduction to the interior landscape requirements from 10 percent (456 sq. ft.) to 4.39 percent (206 sq. ft.) of the vehicular use area. The landscape proposal includes a generous tiered landscape buffer on Missouri Avenue including magnolias and over 100 shrubs. Additionally, two non - conforming parking spaces are being removed on the adjacent property and converted to landscape islands. Four species of trees are being incorporated including bald cypress, elm, magnolia and holly. The proposed landscaping will soften the parking lot appearance. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3- 1202.G of the Community Develop- ment Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: Staff Report — Community Development Board — November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007 -06024 Page 3 of 7 Consistent Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principle N/A N/A buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the land- scape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape pro- X gram shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off N/A N/A when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program will enhance the community charac- X ter of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehen- sive landscape program will have a beneficial impact on the value of X property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for develop- ment. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape program is consistent with N/A N/A any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Staff Report — Community Development Board — November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007 -06024 Page 3 of 7 Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Tables 2 -701.1 and 2 -704 for the Commercial District of the Community Development Code: 1 - See the analysis above for discussion regarding setback reductions for further information. Staff Report — Community Development Board — November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007 -06024 Page 4 of 7 Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent F.A.R. Com(C): 0.55 N/A X I.S.R. Com(C): 0.95 0.68 X Lot Area Com(C): 10,000 square feet 6,728 square feet X1 Lot Width Com(C): 100 feet (Missouri Ave) 67 feet X1 Com(C): 100 feet (Rogers Street) 84 feet X' Height Com(C): N/A N/A X Setbacks (Commercial) Front: 25 feet West 10 feet (to X1 pavement) Front: 25 feet South 10 feet (to X' pavement) Side: 10 feet East 0 feet (to X' pavement) Side: 10 feet North 5 feet (to X) pavement) Parking Spaces Off - Street Parkin /A 13 parking spaces X 1 - See the analysis above for discussion regarding setback reductions for further information. Staff Report — Community Development Board — November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007 -06024 Page 4 of 7 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Staff Report— Community Development Board — November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007 -06024 Page 5 of 7 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. X 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent X and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. X 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development X 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter X the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum stan- dard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelop- ment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preserva- tion of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: X a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Staff Report— Community Development Board — November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007 -06024 Page 5 of 7 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913 of the Community Development Code: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.154 acres is located within the Commercial (C) District; 2. The site is currently vacant; 3. The proposal includes reductions to setbacks to pavement; 4. The proposal is to construct a 13 -space parking lot; 5. The lot area is 6,728 square feet, which requires a reduction from the 10,000 square feet required; 6. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development and will provide needed public parking on the beach; and 7. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -701.1 and 2 -704 for the Commercial District of the Community Development Code; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3 -913 and the other standards of the Code; and 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.and I and the Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3- 1202.G. Staff Report — Community Development Board — November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007 -06024 Page 6 of 7 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use X of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of X persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.154 acres is located within the Commercial (C) District; 2. The site is currently vacant; 3. The proposal includes reductions to setbacks to pavement; 4. The proposal is to construct a 13 -space parking lot; 5. The lot area is 6,728 square feet, which requires a reduction from the 10,000 square feet required; 6. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development and will provide needed public parking on the beach; and 7. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -701.1 and 2 -704 for the Commercial District of the Community Development Code; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3 -913 and the other standards of the Code; and 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.and I and the Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3- 1202.G. Staff Report — Community Development Board — November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007 -06024 Page 6 of 7 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on October 4, 2007. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL for the Flexible Development application for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit an off-street parking lot in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the lot width along Missouri Avenue from 100 feet to 67 feet, a reduction to the lot width along Rogers Street from 100 feet to 84 feet, a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,728 square feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C. and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.39% under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3- 1202.G. with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That a Unity of Title be completed and recorded for 1200 and 1204 Rogers Street prior to the issuance any permits; 2. That landscaping at both 1200 Rogers and 1204 Rogers Street be installed per the proposal submitted; and 3. That Planning Staff conduct a final inspection prior to the Certificate of Completion. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff. A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S. (Planning Departmen6C D BIFLEX (FLD) Wending cases)Up for the next CDBIRogers 1200 - Meek Parking Lot (C)- 11 -20 -07 CDB - SKIRogers 1200 Staff Report. doc Staff Report — Community Development Board — November 20, 2007 Case FLD2007 -06024 Page 7 of 7 Resume A. Scott Kurleman 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727- 562 =4567 x2504 scott.kurleman(i ,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner II City of Clearwater June 2005 to present Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. Land Resource Specialist City of Clearwater June 1996 to June 2005 Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non - compliance with City land resource regulations. Landscape re- inspection program. Plans and directs program to ensure that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private properties. • Account Manager Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. 1993-1996 Groveland, FL Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan. Planned and directed in -field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees. Licensed Marketing Representative Allstate Insurance Company 1991-1993 Clearwater, FL Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance. Store Manager William Natorp company, Inc. 1983-1991 Cincinnati, OH Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products. EDUCATION MBA- Masters of Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Graduated 1998. Major: Management. AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER, Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in Arboriculture. ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL -0414. PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 26, 2007 ITY OF C LFAR` ATFR POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Renee Ruggiero 300 South Belcher Road Clearwater, FL 33765 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2007 -06024 1200 Rogers Street Dear Ms. Ruggiero: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On November 20, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit an off - street parking lot in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the lot width along Missouri Avenue from 100 feet to 67 feet, a reduction to the lot width along Rogers Street from 100 feet to 84 feet, a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 6,728 square feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C. and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 feet to 10 feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from five feet to zero feet, and a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.39% under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3- 1202G. The Community. Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The subject 0.154 acres is located within the Commercial (C) District; 2. The site is currently vacant; 3. The proposal includes reductions to setbacks to pavement; 4. The proposal is to construct a 13 -space parking lot; 5. The lot area is 6,728 square feet, which requires a reduction from the 10,000 square feet required; 6. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development and will provide needed public parking on the beach; and 7. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. Staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2 -701.1 and 2- 704 for the Commercial District of the Community Development Code; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3 -913 and the other standards of the Code; and 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.I and the Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3- 1202.G. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. That a Unity of Title be completed and recorded for 1200 and 1204 Rogers Street prior to the issuance any permits; 2. That landscaping at both 1200 Rogers and 1204 Rogers Street be installed per the proposal submitted; 3. That Planning Staff conduct a final inspection prior to the Certificate of Completion; and 4. That prior to building permit, the applicant shall provide a handicap parking space in accordance with Community Development Code Section 3 -1408 and an accessible route from the public sidewalk to the building in accordance with the Florida Building Code Section 11-4.3.2(1). Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (November 20, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on December 4, 2007 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call A. Scott Kurleman, Planner H, at 727 -562- 4567x2504. Sincerely, icha el , AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next CDBIRogers 1200 - Meek Parking Lot (C)- 11 -20 -07 CDB - SKIRogers Street 1200 Development Order.doc FLD2007 -06024 1200 Rogers Street 10/22/2007 Subject vacant site at 1200 Rogers Street. McDonalds on the southeast corner of Rogers Street and Missouri Avenue. West facade of 1204 Rogers Street. • • South fagade of 1204 Rogers Street. Looking west from the corner of Rogers Street and Missouri Avenue. Subject vacant site looking west. 2 Adjacent property to the east (1204 Rogers Street). 171 0 • r) Ij Aerial Map Owner: John H Meek Jr. Case: FLD2007 -06C24 Sites: 1200 Roges Street Property Size Acres : 0.154 Atlas Paae: ?96B PINS: 15- 29 -15- 38574- 018 -0301 CBD 311 r 321 tR/OG R 313 C G ry 314 315 4 412 405 Sq /1/Tq ^ ; 321 RN z 2 ss ROSq ST Q VV oo µ 407 2 u7 N n J 4 ' N J F N N p N c, �G o R /0G 1 CB ®^ 4108 I CG RH RH i 500 500 W ROGERS ST P Q 528 j 532 Q y y y COURTST 606 CG 61 N N N r � R/OG 539 CG 501 R /OG 603 RH 605 6„ CG cS <°o 613 CG 615 RH b�si � c°o s, RH 619 620 622 R^ 61 61 624 Future Land Use Map Owner: John H. Meek Jr. Case; FLD2007 -06024 Sites: 1200 Rogers Street Property Size Acres : 0,154 Atlas Paae; 296B PINS: 15- 29 -15- 38574 - 018 -0301 o ; ; R R /CMG o o Z N N ^ ^ A TURNER ST ' 'r V eN- E 60 6 � 6 601 604 Future Land Use Map Owner: John H. Meek Jr. Case; FLD2007 -06024 Sites: 1200 Rogers Street Property Size Acres : 0,154 Atlas Paae; 296B PINS: 15- 29 -15- 38574 - 018 -0301 d I ST J < WsT u cc b U PARK ST S W a ST Y til F ST 2 Z R E RC E a 4 4 4 K `z 60 U) F ¢ < GOULD ST ! } FRANKLST W�"l •S'Tj_ 5� BRO'.YNELL ST RO SA COURT ST S.R. 60 OGERS ST -j . Ln `o z ILA " PINE PROJECT SITE ❑ ? cc `� PI NE o u 7 z r" a m z d DRUID RM � =2=. z WAY r/n&t - cf JASMINE WAY � ❑ Lu Pv1.AGNOLI.A DR PATH LOTUS n Location Map Owner: John H. Meek Jr. Case: FLD2007 -06024 Sites: 1200 Rogers Street Property Size Acres : 0.154 Atlas Page: 2966 PINS: 15- 29 -15- 38574 - 018 -0301 16 17 18 19 1 20 21 22 23 124 1 25 I I I I 1412 11 10 9 �8 6 1 5 1 4 3 1 2 MIR 19 ' I" ^I 1 42696 1 COURTS T I I I ^ N /6 �(10 !01 1 1^ 1 5 1 4 I-3 1 2 100 ISM 1 127 � 1791817 6115114 13 111 1019 18 7 S I 12 11 r - - — 1 —� I— I 31/03 78880 _1 C 30B 29 28 27 R 3 24 22 51: SL _ e� tp gp N N A 500 51531A N O N hY N N y{ 1511 511 2 W $ ROGERS ST " — b / 7 313 1 1 8314 315 1 — 13A 405 9 SA/VT A \ ; 321 1 �, ROSA ST Q 1 N ^7 1$ 1� 5 0 1 � 1 3 1 2 1 1 42696 1 COURTS T I I I ^ N /6 �(10 !01 1 1^ 1 5 1 4 I-3 1 2 100 ISM 1 127 � 1791817 6115114 13 111 1019 18 7 S I 12 11 r - - — 1 —� I— I 31/03 78880 _1 C 30B 29 28 27 R 3 24 22 51: SL _ e� tp gp N N A 500 51531A N O N hY N N y{ 1511 511 2 W $ ROGERS ST " — b / 7 313 1 1 8314 315 1 — 13A 405 9 SA/VT A \ ; 321 1 �, ROSA ST Q 1 N 4II7 10 _ g 2. I p� 1 Z c� P I^ 1 1 411 ,Z — 14'� I I N Q 1 N N NN 8 1 7 1�6 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1^ V �11 4 13' '2 I I I 1 ? I I I 1 +pp�88� i —1. T-1 '� 17 •, T' I �I /1 p� 1 I 1 I 1 � 57 b]— P, �rq R �9I 181 18 18 t8 14 12 10j � � R7 1 129 17 I 1 61 I 19 171 191 117 I 1151 1131 11 90 INI 181 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I P 1 1 1 1 b ro IA1 I I I I I I 1 3 42696 1 COURTS T I I I ^ N /6 �(10 !01 1 1^ 1 5 1 4 I-3 1 2 100 ISM 1 127 � 1791817 6115114 13 111 1019 18 7 S I 12 11 r - - — 1 —� I— I 31/03 78880 _1 C 30B 29 28 27 R 3 24 22 51: SL _ e� tp gp N N A 500 51531A N O N hY N N y{ 1511 511 2 W $ ROGERS ST — "A J I I 11B 1 N N ^ 539,28 X10 9 1 9 �7 — 13A 1_51967 13 IV 13 4 15 -14A_ I 11 T J) IN 1 N 1 1 N ' _ Q 4 1 1 8 5 1 6 ! -- 52.9 532 1 F B 1 N I 7 1 y 1 3 605 6— q v! 411 8 I 8 tsar I ^ I ^ 613 X07 1 �7 — 9 19 8 1 17 1 6 1 15 14 13 12 1 11 1 1 8 600 4v9z 8 6�s�u L? — e 620 MHDR 42103619 sob 2 s12 614 1 8 9 _ 10 614 112 _ J 625 4 — T — — 1— 7 1 9 624 662 I 8 1 10 701 — — "A J I I 11B 1 N N ^ 539,28 X10 9 1 9 �7 — 13A 1_51967 13 IV 13 4 15 -14A_ I 11 T J) IN 1 N 1 1 N ' L 'OJ MQ > r 3 .I 2 1245 ee�19� I 11 Q - V IV � 1� 2 TURNER ST JO 1 N ' _ 61 0603 —QA Q4' 1 J ^3 ^ 603 8 1 7 6 5 1 3 605 6— q 411 I 8 8 50 613 X07 9 I 10 I I N OI 11 615 4v9z 8 6�s�u e 620 MHDR 42103619 2 s12 614 7 112 625 4 4vo4 7 0 Zoning Map Owner: John H. Meek Jr. Case: FLD2007 -06024 Sites: 1200 Rogers Street Property Size Acres : 0.154 Atlas Paae: 296B PINS: 15- 29 -15- 38574 - 018 -0301 1180 LLC 1900 SERPENTINE DR S ST PETERSBURG FL 33712 - 6061 501 S LINCOLN AVE PARTNERSHIP 2818 SCOBEE DR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 7212 AMBERT, DANIELLE 28 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - BAR, DALIT BAR, ALON 701 S MADISON AVE # 104 CLEARWATER FL 33756-' BATDORF, CHARLES E BATDORF, LINDA D 1940 RAINBOW DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - C L H VENTURES INC 501 S LINCOLN AVE # 15 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CHAVANNE, PHILLIPE R CHAVANNE, CATHERINE M 701 S MADISON AVE # 404 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4145 COLUMBIAN CORPORATION PO BOX 4745 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4745 DRIESSEN, MICHAEL R 155 PALMETTO RD BELLEAIR FL 33756 - FLD2007- 06024;96 1196 LLC 1900 SERPENTINE DR S ST PETERSBURG FL 33712 - 6061 501 S M LLC 1900 SERPENTINE DR'S ST PETERSBURG FL 33712 - 6061 B F S RETAIL & COMMERCIAL OPR 535 MARRIOTT DR NASHVILLE TN 37214 - 5092 BARNOVA, ANDREA BARNA, PETR 701 W MADISON AVE # 102 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - BEAUREGARD,EMANUAL 701 MADISON AVE # 316 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - C L H VENTURES INC 501 S LINCOLN AVE STE 24 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5964 GREAT BRITAIN �- 1212 -1218 COURT ST PTRSHP 307 SCOTTS CT BOLINGBROOK IL 60440 - 1135 ABREU, CESAR R ABREU, ELOISA Z 501 S LINCOLN AVE STE 11 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5901 BAKER, ROBERT E FAULKNER, DOLORES C 1212 ROGERS ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5903 BARTKUS, CHRISTOPHER SCHMAUTZ, EMIL N 615 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5963 BOREK, JOHN 1200 COUNTRY CLUB DR # 5505 LARGO FL 33774 - CARLSON & MEISSNER PROPERTIES 250 BELCHER RD N STE 102 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2622 CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS CLYDE MEHR & BETHANY JEAN LIVI COALITION JOE EVICH, PRESIDENT 5089 NORTHFIELD DR P.O. BOX 8204 HOWELL MI 48843 - 6826 CLEARWATER, FL 33758 CORNER SERV LTD INC 1175 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5748 DRIESSEN, MICHAEL 155 PALMETTO RD BELLEAIR FL 33756 - CREECH, LARRY E CREECH, LINDA F 832 BURTON TRL ADAMS TN 37010 - 8936 ESNO, PHILLIP S ESNO, KATHLEEN L 1332 MAIN ST BURGETTSTOWN PA 15021 - FEGER, GAIL FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO FITZGERALD, PAUL B TIVERON, LINDA ATTN: TAX DEPT # 104248 FITZGERALD, MARTHA T PO BOX 5388 535 MARRIOTT DR 704 REGENCY CT CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 5388 NASHVILLE TN 37214 - 5092 TAMPA FL 33613 - 2148 FITZGERALD, PETER A FRANCHISE RLTY INTERSTATE MC GAGNE, MARLENE 10830 SW 166TH TER D 1700 RUE VIMONT MIAMI FL 33157 - 2902 PO BOX 8589 MONTREAL QC H1V -31-2 00030- CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 CANADA GARLAND, JEFFREY W GARLAND, FEZIJE 1185 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5748 GOLDENBERG, GIL DODDS, ANAT 701 S MADISON AVE # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - HIBISCUS GARDENS LLC 1211 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5801 HOUGHTON - WAGMAN PTNSHP LTD 1219 DARLINGTON OAK CIR NE ST PETERSBURG FL 33703 - 6315 K & A INVESTMENT PROPERTIES LL 6502 RANGER DR TAMPA FL 33615 - 2525 KEYS, RANDALL D 6713 E WHITEWAY DR TAMPA FL 33617 - 3216 LADSON, LOUIS F 4402 W PRESCOTT ST TAMPA FL 33616 - 2531 GELINAS, THERESE 362 CHEMIN BEAUCHATEL ROUYN - NORANDA QC J9Y K4 00030 CANADA GOUDREAULT, JOSEE 411 CLEVELAND# 267 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - HICKEY, KENNETH W HICKEY, ROSEANNE M 405 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5835 JERLING, JAMES A JERLING, TRACIE M 1719 N BRIANTINE LN VILLA PARK CA 92867 - 4060 KANAAN, ELIAS BACHA, MOUNA 8137 COTTONWOOD CT SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 3448 KIRKLAND, NORMAN L JR THE 1605 N HERCULES AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1930 LAKE, JOHN A B LAKE, CHRISTINE A 12631 LITHUANIA DR GRANADA HILLS CA 91344 - LAKESIDE CROSSING CONDO ASSN LEVERING, BRIAN W I LEVERING, MELISSA F 701 S MADISON AVE 1507 ATAMI CT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4163 WESLEY CHAPEL FL 33543 - 6845 GLOCKSON,BARRY 4322 OCEAN DR MANHATTAN BEACH CA 90266 - GRAVES, MILDRED P THE 626 BOCA CIEGA PT BLVD N ST PETERSBURG FL 33708 - 2730 HOSSEINI, CHARLENE 6104 KIPPS COLONY DR W GULFPORT FL 33707 - 3970 JERLING, TRACIE M JERLING, JAMES A 1719 N BRIGANTINE LN VILLA PARK CA 92867 - 4060 KENNEDY, TYRONE G KENNEDY, BARBARA J 9412 TARA CAY CT SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 1154 L N D ROYAL ORLEANS LLC PO BOX 284 GALENA OH 43021 - LAKE, JOHN A B LAKE, CHRISTINE ANNE 12631 LITHUANIA DR GRANADA HILLS CA 91344 - 1504 LICCIARDI, SAM 215 N JEFFERSON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4719 LINCOLN SQUARE PROP CONDO LINCOURT MEDICAL OFFICE CONDO LUMPKIN, DANIEL M ASSN 501 S LINCOLN AVE LUMPKIN, KELLY J 9412 TARA CAY CT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5945 7018 MADISON AVE # 306 SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 1154 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4161 M R COURT TRUST MADISON GLEN REAL ESTATE LLC MARKS, LLOYD S THE 2300 ALLIGATOR CREEK RD 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 208 7520 SW 162ND ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2205 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - MIAMI FL 33157 - 3822 MARKS, RUTH B THE ATTN PROPERTY TAX MAILSTOP 3WB PO BOX 9141 CANTON MA 02021 - 9141 MEEK, JOHN H JR 1211 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - NAJEMIAN, THERESA NAJEMIAN, GEORGE P 363 HATTI E ST PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5455 NICHOLS, PETER G 614 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5915 PERRON,JOSEE 139 BOUL DES PRAIRIES APP 2 LAVAL QC H7N 2T7 00030 - CANADA PILAT, GEORGE R PILAT, SUZANNA L PO BOX 727 CLEARWATER FL 33757 0727 ROSEN, ANDREW T ROSEN,ANAT 3065 N 36TH AVE HOLLYWOOD FL 33021 - 3060 MC DONALDS CORP 009/0085 539 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5940 MELUCCI, DENNIS MELUCCI, SANDRA 105 CRESTWOOD LN LARGO FL 33770 - MEEK & MILD II LLC 625 COURT ST STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - MIRANDA, EVA 701 S MADISON AVE # 503 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4140 NEW ZION MISSIONARY BAPTIST CH NEW ZION MSSNY BAPT CHURCH BOARD OF TRUSTEES 1317 WOODBINE ST 1182 BROWNELL ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2747 CLEARWATER FL 33756 NORSWORTHY, AUSTIN 2608 JUNIPER CT BEDFORD TX 76021 - PHILLIPS, JAMES 1634 BALMORAL DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - PUGLIATTI, LUISELLA 701 S MADISON AVE # 410 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4145 SADDLE HILL PROPERTIES LLC 1141 TAYLOR AVE DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 2118 NUMA, MARIE S MARC, OPTANIE N 1388 BROWNING ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - PHILLIPS, MARY CATHERINE 1221 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5801 RENEE RUGGIERO NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 300 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD CLEARWATER, FL 33765 SCHIERONI, STELLA SCHIERONI, WALTER 20219 BLCK CANYON DR KATY TX 77450 - SCHWEITZER, E F THE STEWART, ROBYN WALLACE TUELL, ROBERT D 1206 COURT ST 210 DELMORE AVE TUELL, CHANTAL L CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5802 SOUTH PLAINFIELD NJ 07080 - 3208 7100 SUNSET WAY # PH5 ST PETE BEACH FL 33706 - 3600 WACHTEL, MITCHELL WALANILO DEVELOPMENT LTD WEIHRICH, BENJAMIN WACHTEL, JACQUELINE URBANIK, DAWN 9600 DELEGATES DR 76 WOOBLY RD ORLANDO FL 32837 - 8355 701 S MADISON AVE # 515 BOLTON MA 01740 - 1428 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4140 WENTZLER, GEORGE W JR WESTCOAST PROF PHARMACY INC YARBROUGH, TANDAE WENTZLER, VICTORIA L 501 S LINCOLN AVE STE 10 10712 DALTON AVE 125 MAYFAIR CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5901 TAMPA FL 33615 - 3502 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5821 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, November 20, 2007, beginning at 1:00 PM, in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neishborine property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent aeenda and approved by a sinele vote at the beginninE of the meeting. 1. Clant, Inc (Monica Pomroy, Interplan, LLC) are requesting Flexible Development approval for a bank (retail sales and services) within the Commercial (C) District and the Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI) with deviations from the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement) and the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Sec 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code. [Proposed Use: Retail Sales and Services (Bank)] at 2710 Gulf -to -Bay Blvd, Park Place Outparcels Parcel C. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2007 -10031 2. John H. Meek Jr. (Renee Ruggiero, Northside Engineering Services, Inc) are requesting Flexible Development approval for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit an off - street parking lot in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the lot width along Missouri Ave. from 100 ft to 67 ft, a reduction to the lot width along Rogers St. from 100 ft to 84 ft, a reduction to the minimum lot area from 10,000 sq. ft to 6,728 sq. ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to five ft (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement) under the provisions of Sec. 2- 704.C. and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 10 ft, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from five ft to zero ft, and a reduction to the required interior landscaping from 10% to 4.39% under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Program per Sec. 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Free Standing Parking Lot) at 1200 Rogers St., Hibiscus Gardens Blk R, Lots 30B, 31A & 31B Less St. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II. FLD2007 -06024 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.; weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REOUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEER REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http:// clearwater .granicus.com /ViewPublisher.php ?view id =11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 11/08/07 ' + F' , 007 - 06024;96 1180 LLC 1196 LLC 1212 -1218 COURT ST PTRSHP 1900 SERPENTINE DR S 1900 SERPENTINE DR S 307 SCOTTS CT ST PETERSBURG FL 33712 - 6061 ST PETERSBURG FL 33712 - 6061 BOLINGBROOK IL 60440 -1135 501 S LINCOLN AVE PARTNERSHIP 501 S M LLC ABREU, CESAR R 2818 SCOBEE DR 1900 SERPENTINE DR S ABREU, ELOISA Z PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 7212 ST PETERSBURG FL 33712 - 6061 501 S LINCOLN AVE STE 11 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5901 AMBERT, DANIELLE B F S RETAIL & COMMERCIAL OPR BAKER, ROBERT E 28 N FORT HARRISON AVE 535 MARRIOTT DR FAULKNER, DOLORES C CLEARWATER FL 33755 - NASHVILLE TN 37214 - 5092 1212 ROGERS ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5903 BAR, DALIT BARNOVA, ANDREA BARTKUS, CHRISTOPHER BAR, ALON BARNA, PETR SCHMAUTZ, EMIL N 701 S MADISON AVE # 104 701 W MADISON AVE # 102 615 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5963 BATDORF, CHARLES E BEAUREGARD, EMANUAL BOREK, JOHN BATDORF, LINDA D 701 MADISON AVE # 316 1200 COUNTRY CLUB DR # 5505 1940 RAINBOW DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - LARGO FL 33774 - CLEARWATER FL 33765 - C L H VENTURES INC C L H VENTURES INC CARLSON & MEISSNER 501 S LINCOLN AVE # 15 501 S LINCOLN AVE STE 24 PROPERTIES CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5964 250 BELCHER RD N STE 102 GREAT BRITAIN CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2622 CHAVANNE, PHILLIPE R CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS CLYDE MEHR & BETHANY JEAN LIVI CHAVANNE, CATHERINE M COALITION JOE EVICH, PRESIDENT 5089 NORTHFIELD DR 701 S MADISON AVE # 404 P.O. BOX 8204 HOWELL MI 48843 - 6826 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4145 CLEARWATER, FL 33758 COLUMBIAN CORPORATION CORNER SERV LTD INC CREECH, LARRY E PO BOX 4745 1175 COURT ST CREECH, LINDA F CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4745 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5748 832 BURTON TRL ADAMS TN 37010 - 8936 DRIESSEN, MICHAEL R DRIESSEN, MICHAEL ESNO, PHILLIP S 155 PALMETTO RD 155 PALMETTO RD ESNO, KATHLEEN L BELLEAIR FL 33756 - BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1332 MAIN ST BURGETTSTOWN PA 15021 - FEGER, GAIL FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO FITZGERALD, PAUL B TIVERON, LINDA ATTN: TAX DEPT # 104248 FITZGERALD, MARTHA T PO BOX 5388 535 MARRIOTT DR 704 REGENCY CT CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 5388 NASHVILLE TN 37214 - 5092 TAMPA FL 33613 - 2148 t FITZGERALD, PETER A 10830 SW 166TH TER MIAMI FL 33157 - 2902 GARLAND, JEFFREY W GARLAND, FEZIJE 1185 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5748 GOLDENBERG, GIL DODDS, ANAT 701 S MADISON AVE # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - HIBISCUS GARDENS LLC 1211 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5801 HOUGHTON - WAGMAN PTNSHP LTD 1219 DARLINGTON OAK CIR NE ST PETERSBURG FL 33703 - 6315 K & A INVESTMENT PROPERTIES LL 6502 RANGER DR TAMPA FL 33615 - 2525 KEYS, RANDALL D 6713 E WHITEWAY DR TAMPA FL 33617 - 3216 LADSON, LOUIS F 4402 W PRESCOTT ST TAMPA FL 33616 - 2531 FRANCHISE RLTY INTERSTATE MC D PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 GELINAS, THERESE 362 CHEMIN BEAUCHATEL ROUYN - NORANDA QC J9Y K4 00030 CANADA GOUDREAULT, JOSEE 411 CLEVELAND # 267 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - HICKEY, KENNETH W HICKEY, ROSEANNE M 405 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5835 JERLING, JAMES A JERLING, TRACIE M 1719 N BRIANTINE LN VILLA PARK CA 92867 - 4060 KANAAN, ELIAS BACHA, MOUNA 8137 COTTONWOOD CT SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 3448 KIRKLAND, NORMAN L JR THE 1605 N HERCULES AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1930 LAKE, JOHN A B LAKE, CHRISTINE A 12631 LITHUANIA DR GRANADA HILLS CA 91344 - LAKESIDE CROSSING CONDO ASSN LEVERING, BRIAN W I LEVERING, MELISSA F 701 S MADISON AVE 1507 ATAMI CT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4163 WESLEY CHAPEL FL 33543 - 6845 GAGNE, MARLENE 1700 RUE VIMONT MONTREAL QC HIV -31-2 00030 - CANADA GLOCKSON, BARRY 4322 OCEAN DR MANHATTAN BEACH CA 90266 - GRAVES, MILDRED P THE 626 BOCA CIEGA PT BLVD N ST PETERSBURG FL 33708 - 2730 HOSSEINI, CHARLENE 6104 KIPPS COLONY DR W GULFPORT FL 33707 - 3970 JERLING, TRACIE M JERLING, JAMES A 1719 N BRIGANTINE LN VILLA PARK CA 92867 - 4060 KENNEDY, TYRONE G KENNEDY, BARBARA J 9412 TARA CAY CT SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 1154 L N D ROYAL ORLEANS LLC PO BOX 284 GALENA OH 43021 - LAKE, JOHN A B LAKE, CHRISTINE ANNE 12631 LITHUANIA DR GRANADA HILLS CA 91344 - 1504 LICCIARDI, SAM 215 N JEFFERSON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4719 LINCOLN SQUARE PROP CONDO LINCOURT MEDICAL OFFICE CONDO LUMPKIN, DANIEL M ASSN LUMPKIN, KELLY J 501 S LINCOLN AVE 9412 TARA CAY CT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5945 701 S MADISON AVE # 306 SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 1154 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4161 M R COURT TRUST 2300 ALLIGATOR CREEK RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2205 MARKS, RUTH B THE ATTN PROPERTY TAX MAILSTOP 3WB PO BOX 9141 CANTON MA 02021 - 9141 MEEK, JOHN H JR 1211 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - NAJEMIAN, THERESA NAJEMIAN, GEORGE P 363 HATTIE ST PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5455 NICHOLS, PETER G 614 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5915 PERRON,JOSEE 139 BOUL DES PRAIRIES APP 2 LAVAL QC H7N 2T7 00030 - CANADA PILAT, GEORGE R PILAT, SUZANNA L PO BOX 727 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0727 ROSEN, ANDREW T ROSEN,ANAT 3065 N 36TH AVE HOLLYWOOD FL 33021 - 3060 MADISON GLEN REAL ESTATE LLC 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 208 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - MC DONALDS CORP 009/0085 539 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5940 MELUCCI, DENNIS MELUCCI, SANDRA 105 CRESTWOOD LN LARGO FL 33770 - MARKS, LLOYD S THE 7520 SW 162ND ST MIAMI FL 33157 - 3822 MEEK & MILD II LLC 625 COURT ST STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - MIRANDA, EVA 701 S MADISON AVE # 503 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4140 NEW ZION MISSIONARY BAPTIST CH NEW ZION MSSNY BAPT CHURCH BOARD OF TRUSTEES 1317 WOODBINE ST 1182 BROWNELL ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2747 CLEARWATER FL 33756 NORSWORTHY, AUSTIN 2608 JUNIPER CT BEDFORD TX 76021 - PHILLIPS, JAMES 1634 BALMORAL DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - PUGLIATTI, LUISELLA 701 S MADISON AVE # 410 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4145 SADDLE HILL PROPERTIES LLC 1141 TAYLOR AVE DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 2118 NUMA, MARIE S MARC, OPTANIE N 1388 BROWNING ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - PHILLIPS, MARY CATHERINE 1221 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5801 RENEE RUGGIERO NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 300 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD CLEARWATER, FL 33765 SCHIERONI, STELLA SCHIERONI, WALTER 20219 BLCK CANYON DR KATY TX 77450 - SCHWEITZER, E F THE STEWART, ROBYN WALLACE TUELL, ROBERT D 1206 COURT ST 210 DELMORE AVE TUELL, CHANTAL L CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5802 SOUTH PLAINFIELD NJ 07080 - 3208 7100 SUNSET WAY # PH5 ST PETE BEACH FL 33706 - 3600 WACHTEL, MITCHELL WALANILO DEVELOPMENT LTD WEIHRICH, BENJAMIN WACHTEL, JACQUELINE URBANIK, DAWN 9600 DELEGATES DR 76 WOOBLY RD ORLANDO FL 32837 - 8355 701 S MADISON AVE # 515 BOLTON MA 01740 - 1428 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4140 ! -t WENTZLER, GEORGE W JR WESTCOAST PROF PHARMACY INC YARBROUGH, TANDAE WENTZLER, VICTORIA L 501 S LINCOLN AVE STE 10 10712 DALTON AVE 125 MAYFAIR CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5901 TAMPA FL 33615 - 3502 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5821 E d3roMdV310 do AIJ' I %AV.Wd3® JNINWd 130 3' S9 F F 4 C .� October 11, 2007 Mr. Scott Kurleman Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2007 -06024 1200 Rogers Street Response to DRC Dear Mr. Kurleman: i V I Land Planning Ne Diligence Reports Re- Zoning, Land Use, Annexation Stol- 111miter K)1)1agentent Utility De sigh 'Fraffic Coiistr�tictiori Ac: ministr<°ition Listed below are our responses to the Development Review Committee meeting held on Thursday, October 4, 2007. General EnRineerinR (Prior to CDB) 1. Please see revised Civil Sheet C3.1 for enlarged and expanded note relating to the new sidewalk and the connection to the existing. The new sidewalk along Rogers will be designed to connect to the existing sidewalk along Missouri Avenue. 2. Please see revised Civil Sheet C3.1 which provides an ADA ramp for southbound pedestrians. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Acknowledged; 5 sets of signed and sealed .as -built drawings shall be submitted to the Construction Services Inspector for field review. Stormwater (Prior to Issuance of Permit) 1. Acknowledged; approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption shall be submit to the City prior to issuance of permit. 2. Acknowledged; prior to issuance of the permit for construction of the site, the maintenance instruction letter shall be revised to advise property owner that the requirements contained within the maintenance instruction letter are requirements of SWFWMD and the City of Clearwater. Prior to issuance of the construction permit the maintenance instruction letter will also be revised to include a signature as per your request. The maintenance instruction letter included within this resubmittal has been revised to provide draw down within 24 hours. General Note: Acknowledged Items 1 -2. RO.Bo)x 4948 Cfearwacei; FL 33758 -4948 t�; c: h( �riarthsid�e��g €�eE�ring.c�nr 727 413 2869 Fax 727 +46 8036 ORIGINAL. RECEMED V L u its i OCT ,� PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Traffic En2ineerin� 1. Please see revised plans which now provide the required ADA truncated dome per FDOT standards on east side of driveway as per your request. 2. Please see revised plan providing the requested maneuvering area. 3. Please see revised plans depicting the removal of the two existing spaces, replacement of curbing and proposed installation of landscape material as per your request. General Note: 1. Acknowledged; additional comments may be forth coming in association with Building Permit Application Review. Planninjj 1. Application has been revised to provided a project valuation of $80,000.00 2. Please see revised plans which now provide wheel stops at all parking spaces within the parking lot. 3. Acknowledged; Unity of Title shall be provided prior to issuance of construction permit. 4. N/A — Comments relating to signage withdrawn. If you have questions or require additional information please feel free to contact me, I will respond to your request immediately. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to your comments; we look forward to the approval and completion of this development project. Sincerely, t Renee Ruggiero Project Planner Meek Parking Lot NES # 724 Revised 10.10.07 =/RMR ORIGINAL RECEIVER OCT, PLANNING DEPARff,f, w, CITY OF CLEAJZ1M/ir� s V H 0- n Z 00 Prom G Is 1,11111d; C) C-) A7 0 (T m c.n O 3nm3A v Af 7ooNn "S VXV U A VM WHO 7-4 .......... ......... 133VJ.S SV3501' o a X) iq 7, A C 4 4 14 A m F1 10 f " Northside CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • STORMWATER REPORT FOR: MEEK PARKING LOT PROJECT e Rare A, Qoeg NO. c s • G ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 0 4 2007 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SURTE 930 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 CITY OrCLEARWATER TECH @NORTHSIDEEN6INEERING.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 31 P-1, 2007 No. 0724 DRAINAGE NARRATIVE The proposed construction activities consist of the following: • Construction of 4,697 S.F. of open impervious vehicular use and sidewalk area. • Construction of a stormwater pond to provide water quality treatment for a volume equal to V2" of runoff over the elI _' site. Treatment of stormwater will be achieved through natural percolation. • Construction of an underground retention vault to provide attenuation for the pre -post volume from the 50 year storm event. Overflow will pop -off into the Rogers Street Right -of -Way. • The more stringent of SWFVVMD's 25yr / 24hr post - development flow not exceeding the 25yr / 24hr pre - development flow vs. Clearwater's weighted coefficient of runoff of stormwater detention was used to determine the storage volume requirement. It was found that the City of Clearwater's stormwater requirement (1,233 cf) was more strict than SWFWMD's requirement and therefore was used in the design of the pond. • The Drainage Calculations have been prepared in accordance with the City of Clearwater Drainage Manual. • The project is located in an open basin. Construction of this project will not increase the existing peak discharge rate or volume. • No wetlands are located in or adjacent to the project area. No wetland impacts will result from construction of this project. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 04 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO.: EXISTING CONDITIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= Meek Parking Lot 724 6,728 SF = 221 SF = 0 SF = 6,507 SF = 0.15 ACRES 0.01 ACRES 0.00 ACRES 0.15 ACRES 6,728 SF 221 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 6,507 SF OF PERU. AREA @ C = C = 0.21 T.O.C. = 60 MINUTES PROPOSED CONDITIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= 6,728 SF = 4,697 SF = 336 SF = 1,695 SF = 0.15 ACRES 0.11 ACRES 0.01 ACRES 0.04 ACRES 6,728 SF 4,697 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 336 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1,695 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C = 0.76 T.O.C. = 60 MINUTES 0.475 1 0.2 0.95 1 0.2 ORIGINAL. RECEIVED SEP 0 4 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO.: Meek Parking Lot 724 POND 1 STAGE STORAGE DATA: T.O.B. EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= STAGE ft -NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 29.50 385 0.009 375 29.25 336 0.008 284 29.00 287 0.007 206 28.75 238 0.005 141 28.50 190 0.004 87 28.00 92 0.002 17 27.75 43 0.001 0 TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = 6,728 SF REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = 0.50 IN REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME = 280 CF PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = 29.25 FT AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY VOLUME = 284 CF VAULT STAGE STORAGE DATA: T.O.V. EL.= D.H.W. 50 EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= STAGE ft -NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 29.75 595 0.014 1,190 29.50 595 0.014 1,041 29.25 595 0.014 893 28.75 595 0.014 595 28.50 595 0.014 446 28.00 595 0.014 149 27.75 595 0.014T 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 04 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES 50 YEAR STORM EVENT PROJECT: Meek Parking Lot PROJECT NO. 724 RUN -OFF COEFFICIENTS PRE - CONSTRUCTION I IN /HR DRAINAGE AREA = TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 6,728 SF 0.15 AC 60 MIN IMP. AREA= 221 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0.475 POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1 PERV. AREA =. 6,507 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.2 C= 0.21 PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST - CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CLEARWATER TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 6,728 SF 0.15 AC 1,233 CF IMP. AREA= 4,697 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0.95 POND AREA= 336 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1 PERV. AREA= 1,695 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.2 C= 0.76 STORAGE CALCULATION PRE - CONSTRUCTION I IN /HR DRAINAGE AREA = 0.15 AC TIME OF CONC. Tc = 60 MIN I @ Tc =60 (50 YEAR EVENT)= 4.00 IN /HR Q(out) = C x I x A= 0.13 CFS POST - CONSTRUCTION 1,233 TIME MIN. I IN /HR Q(in) CFS INFLOW CF OUTFLOW CF STORAGE CF 60.00 4.001 0.471 1,6981 4651 1,233 MAX. STORAGE = 1,233 CF WEIR DESIGN TOP. OF WEIR ELEV.= 29.50 FT BOT. OF WEIR ELEV.= 29.25 FT H = 0.25 FT or 3" ORIGINAL Q = 0.13 CFS RECEIVED L =Q/3.1 *H ^1.5 = 0.33 FT or 4" SEP 04 1007 WATER QUALITY DEPTH = 0.5 in. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED = MAX. STORAGE REQUIRED = 1,233 CF TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED = MAX. STORAGE PROVIDED = 1,325 CF MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PROJECT NAME : 724 - Pollution Abatement Volume POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL Pond Length to Width Ratio (L /W) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Level Elevation of Pond Bottom Design High Water Level Elevation Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond /Exfiltration Trench Hydraulic Control Features: Groundwater Control Features - Y/N Distance to Edge of Pond Elevation of Water Level Impervious Barrier - Y/N Elevation of Barrier Bottom 43.00 ft2 284.00 ft3 6.00 21.38 ft 26.50 ft 27.75 ft 27.75 ft 29.25 ft 0.06 23.40 ft/d 2.00 35.10 ft/d 0.11 1.00 Top Bottom Left Right N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 0 4 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER MODRET TIME - RUNOFF INPUT DATA PROJECT NAME: 724 - POLLUTION ABATEMENT VOLUME STRESS PERIOD NUMBER INCREMENT OF TIME (hrs) VOLUME OF RUNOFF (ft3) Unsat 0.00 0.00 7 1.00 284.00 2 24.88 0.00 3 24.88 0.00 4 24.88 0.00 5 24.88 0.00 6 24.88 0.00 7 24.88 0.00 8 24.88 0.00 9 24.88 0.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 0 4 2037 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS PROJECT NAME: 724 - Pollution Abatement Volume CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (ft3) 00.00 - 0.00 26.500 0.000 0.00000 0.00 26.500 0.04595 0.04435 1.00 28.407 0.04275 0.00 0.00292 12.85 27.750 0.00177 0.00 0.00063 50.75 26.732 0.00042 0.00 0.00021 75.63 26.633 0.00015 0.00 0.00009 100.50 26.591 0.00007 0.00 0.00005 125.38 26.568 0.00004 0.00 0.00003' 150.25 26.554 0.00003 0.00 0.00003 175.13 26.542 0.00002 0.00 0.00001 200.00 26.535 0.00 ORIGINAL. RECEIVED Maximum Water Elevation: 28.407 feet @ 1.00 hours PLANNING DEPARTMENT Recovery @ 12.847 hours * Time increment when there is no runoff CITY OFCLEARWATER WARNING Maximum Infiltration Rate: 20.237 ft/day Exceeds Vertical Permeability: 11.700 ft /day 2 2 2 2 2 M 1 C- 1 a) 1 E 0 1 n-a 0 z C/a Q2 00 � m A m_;D 0 v o ME 9 rn INFILTRATION : 724 - POLLUTION ABATEMENT VOLUME 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Time (hrs) Total Volume Infiltrated = 284 ft' `laE GULF COAST TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 5745 PARK BOULEVARD PINELLAS PARK, FL 33781 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFIED CERTIFIACTE of A UTHORIZATION # 00002370 PHONE: (727) 544 -4080 F ,K-, (:72, fi 544 -7532 CLIENT: John H. Meeks Jr. LAB NO: 13107 PROJECT: NE Corner of Missouri Ave. & Rogers St., Clearwater, FL DATE REPORTED: 6/4/07 DATE TESTED: 6/4/07 LOCATION OF TEST: 48' E of Missouri Ave. x 48' N of Rogers St. DEPTH TO EXISTING WATER TABLE: Not Encountered within 10' Below Existing Ground Surface ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH WATER LEVEL: 3'611 Below the Existing Ground Surface R MARKS: WATER TEMP: 73 deg. F WATER pH. 8.16 GROUND TEMP.: 70 deg. F 28.0 26.0 24.0 22.0 20.0 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 INCH PER HOUR •= INNER RING READINGS SOIL PROFILE .5 I 2 3 4 5 6 Elapsed Time (Hours) INFILTRATION RATE = 11.7 INCHES / HR. Respectfully Submitted, D� 4R. Gunasekaran Fla. Reg. No. 20402 cc: John H. Meeks Jr. 2 Northside Engineering 1 File I I N F I L T R A T I 0 N R A T E Depth CLASSIFICATION to feet. (EXISTING SURFACE APPROX. ELEV.) 0Z Brown SAND w/ Roots & Some Gravel Gray/Brown SAND w/ below Extshn ciTade ;� Occasional Roots .. „:;: Light Gray /Brown SAND w/ Roots 2' 0'.'`.. Light Brown SAND w/ Trace Roots W 4 Test Elevation Very Light Brown SAND w/ 3'4" Trace of Fine Roots Very Light Grayish Brown Silty SAND 6" 2" ; (Damp Soil @ 65" — 74 ") Mottled Pale Brown Sandy CLAY 7' 4 ".,...:.. w/ Orange Streaks Gray Sandy CLAY w/ Orange Streaks w/ Trace of Fine Roots Light Gray Sandy CLAY 10' 0" Hole Terminated at 120" i Ground level 12ring er �55w� do I /� I /a TEST Depths 2' 9" below Extshn ciTade ;� ........... ..... f 6" ate, W 4 Test Elevation _ �- nng set 24" Outer ring ORIGINAL RECENED . SEP 0 4 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER X 1200 Rogers Street �/� �� Meek Parking Lot it NES Project # 0724 DRAINAGE DESIGN JUSTIFICATION NARRATIVE To provide the required attenuation for the 50 year storm event, a vault has been utilized to accomplish the required storage volume with water quality treatment accomplished through the pond. The following information outlines justification for our proposed design: 1. The required storage and treatment volumes are achieved by the proposed design per Clearwaters drainage goals and policies; the proposed method is considered an acceptable standard Engineering practice and is beyond the requirements prescribed by SWFWMD, meeting the intent of Local and State requirements. Further, the proposed design meets the goals and objectives as outlined within the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan by providing a design that is a technically, environmentally, and economically viable method of treating stormwater runoff before final discharge to improve and enhance local surface waters. 2. The proposed development supports the goals and objectives of the City by providing additional parking and support for the surrounding businesses. Every effort has been made to provide a proposal that meets the intent of the Clearwater Community Development, Code relating to drainage, site design and landscaping; together with a use that is allowable and reasonable for this 6,728 sq ft site. 3. The area of land assembled, even with the massing of the three vacant existing platted lots, is remarkably diminutive. In order for this site to be viable for development, the area of the land can not be further diminished by additional pond areas as the minimal remaining site area would be severely reduced, rendering the site completely impractical to develop. 4. The Clearwater Comprehensive Plan encourages infill development associated with parcels less than one acre in size and further recognizes creative application of the code must be utilized to encourage development of these smaller parcels. This development plan meets the intent of the code as it relates to stormwater and drainage design while providing a reasonable development proposal. 5. The developers' decision to utilize a vault at a price of over $25,000.00 clearly demonstrates that economic hardship is not the reason for this design choice; functionality and reasonable use of the land is the driving factor. For this site, without the use of a vault, undue hardship would be placed upon the developer and reasonable use of the land would be denied. ORIGINAL RECENED SEP 0 4 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER Z The proposed vault and pond will provide the site and community with the desired water quality and attenuation, while making the best use of this uniquely small undeveloped property. For the reasons stated above, the installation of a pond large enough to meet the required 50 year storm would place undue hardship on the developer; rendering the site basically unfeasible to develop. Therefore, we respectfully request approval to utilize a vault and pond to properly and responsibly address the drainage for this site. NES #0724 — Meek Parking Lot — revised 8.28.07 RMR/rmr ORIGINAL RECENED SEP 04 26 1"7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 C17Y OF CLEARWATER CIVIL Norlhs'lmde • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: August 29, 2007 To: Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Cleare'L 33755 Reference: ff FLD2007 -06024 1200 Rogers Street — Meek Parking Lot NES Proj# 724 Enclosed Mail Pick -Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment X For Your Approval For Your Information We Transmit: • Originals • Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Please feel free contact me at 43 -28 f you have questions or required additional information. By: Renee Ruggiero, Project Planne ORIGINAL Copies To: File, N. Pelzer, D. Williams RECEIVED SEP 0 4 2007 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TECH @NORTHSIDEEN6INEERING.COM CITY OF CLEARWATER 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 15 Flex. Development Application (Comp. Infill) (Orig. Scott has in File 15 Letter of Authorization & Affidavit (Orig. Scott has in File 15 Warranty Deed 15 Survey (3 Sheets total — Scott has Orig. in file for sheets 1 & 2 — Survey 3 for East Lot is New & 1 Signed and Sealed Included 15 Drainage Design Justification Narrative 15 Stormwater Report & Narrative 1 signed & sealed 15 Comprehensive Landscape Program Application (Orig. Scott has in File) 15 8.5" X 11" Color Landscape Plan 15 8.5" X 11" Civil Site Plan 15 1 Civil & Landscape Drawings (8 sheets) (1 signed & sealed) Please feel free contact me at 43 -28 f you have questions or required additional information. By: Renee Ruggiero, Project Planne ORIGINAL Copies To: File, N. Pelzer, D. Williams RECEIVED SEP 0 4 2007 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TECH @NORTHSIDEEN6INEERING.COM CITY OF CLEARWATER 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 Clearwater July 16, 2007 Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, F133755 CITY OF CLEA�,WATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W .MYCLEARWATER. COM VIA FAX: 727 - 446 -8036 RE: FLD2007 -06024 -- 1200 ROGERS ST -- Letter of Completeness Dear Housh Ghovaee : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2007- 06024. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 02, 2007, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562- 4567x2504 or Scott.Kiirleman @myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Scott Kurleman Planner H Letter of Completeness - FLD2007 -06024 -1200 ROGERS ST Northside 5tZg'ldt" sm&"' INC. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: July 10, 2007 To: Sherry Watkins, Admin. Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: FLD2007 -06024 — 1200 Rogers Street NES Proj# 724 Enclosed Mail Pick -Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment X For Your Approval For Your Information CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • We Transmit: • Originals • Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Please contact me at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: Ka—W Ruggiero, Proje 1 r 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH @NORTHSIDEENGINEERING.CO M 727.443.2869 FAX 727.44611036 Copies To: ORIGINAL RIND JUL 1 o 2007 PLANtOiG � n A E CITY Of CLEFS File N. Pelzer R. Ruggiero Copies Description 15 Response Letter 15 Photo's of adjoining sites to east (1 set color— 14 sets B & 15 Revised Civil Sheets C3.1 and L1.1 , 1 Signed and Sealed 15 Aerial Photos (1 color —14 B & W) Please contact me at (727) 443 -2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: Ka—W Ruggiero, Proje 1 r 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH @NORTHSIDEENGINEERING.CO M 727.443.2869 FAX 727.44611036 Copies To: ORIGINAL RIND JUL 1 o 2007 PLANtOiG � n A E CITY Of CLEFS File N. Pelzer R. Ruggiero Northside '500xezurq. Sar A&W, %aa. July 9, 2007 Mr. Scott Kurleman Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2007 -06024 –1200 Rogers Street – Letter of Incompleteness NES# 724. Dear Mr. Kurleman: CIVE LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENT AL The following information is provided in response to your letter of incompleteness dated July 5, 2007. 1. As per your request the Landscape plan has been revised to provide the side slopes and bottom elevations of the retention area. The pond provides for 4:1 slopes along the southern and western sides of the pond and vertical walls along the eastern and northern sides of the pond. 2. As per your request the percentage and square footage of each interior landscape area has been provided on the revised Staking plan. 3. The property owner does not have a survey of 1204 Rogers Street, therefore one can not be provided by July 10, 2007 at 10:00 am. I have provided the following documentation for your use and information to assist in lieu of the requested survey: a. Aerial view of 1204 Rogers Street b. Approved site plan from 1962 for the installation of the driveway for 1204 Rogers c. The survey previously provided for 1200 Rogers Street includes this area as a bleed over from 1204 Rogers Street. d. Photographs of the southern portion of the 1204 Rogers Street site for context. Should you determine a survey of the neighboring site is necessary to continue with this project, one can be ordered and available within the next 7 working days. Thank for the opportunity to address these outstanding issues; I trust that this information will be sufficient to address the incomplete status of the above referenced project to allow the project to move forward to DRC to continue discussions. However, should you require additional information or clarification, please contact me and I will respond immediately to any outstanding concerns or questions you may have. 4 S ' %eu-'g—giero, y, oProjectPIQ cc: NES file 724 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH @NORTHSE3)EEN6ENEEREN6.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 ORKSIML REMIV#D JUL 10 2001 PLANNIM OffiRRVIENI CITY OF CLYOWATER °Clearwater July 05, 2007 Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, F133755 CITY OF CLEI?RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4576 W W W . MYCLEARW ATER. C OM VIA FAX: 727 - 446 -8036 RE: FLD2007 -06024 -- 1200 ROGERS ST -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Housh Ghovaee : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2007- 06024. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide side slopes and bottom elevations of retention area on landscape plan per Section H. 2. Show the percentage and square footage of each interior landscape area on the landscape plan per Section H. 3. The 7.5 feet strip of land at 1204 Rogers that is being used for 1200 Rogers is not mentioned. How will this function. Provide a survey and site plan for 1204 Rogers. Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Tuesday, July 10, 2007 @ 10:00 AM. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562- 4567x2504 or Scott.Kurleman@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Scott Kurleman Planner II Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2007 -06014 -1100 ROGERS ST Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 15 29 15 38574 018 0301 Page 2 of 3 15 / 29 / 15 138574 / 018 / 0301 03 -Jul -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:00:01 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales MEEK, JOHN H JR OBK: 09948 OPG: 2285 1211 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 -5801 EVAC: Non -EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 264.00 sales from 2004 - 2005: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 12/1,997 9,94812,285 52,000 {Q} U 1926: Book 014 Pgs 055 -059 0 /0 01 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { } 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 63,100 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 63,100 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 63,100 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 1,373.31 1} 75 x 90 12. 00 6, 750. 00 S Special Tax .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be`': 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 1,373.31 6} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 1,373.31 Short Legal HIBISCUS GARDENS BLK R, LOTS 30B, 31A 8c 31B Description LESS ST Building Information http:// 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &r = &s =1 &u= 0 &p= 15 +29 +15 +38574 +... 7/3/2007 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 15 29 15 38574 018 0301 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 15 / 2 / 15 / 38574 018 1 0301 Page 3 of 3 03 -Jul -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 16:00:01 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 Vacant Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year S) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Rack to Search _Page. An explanation of this screen http: // 136 .174.187.131htbin /cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &r = &s =1 &u= 0 &p= 15 +29 +15 +38574 +... 7/3/2007 1200 Rogers Street Meek Parking Lot NES Project # 0724 DRAINAGE DESIGN JUSTIFICATION NARRATIVE To provide the required attenuation for the 50 year storm event, a vault has been utilized to accomplish the required storage volume with water quality treatment through a pond containing a vertical wall on two sides; the following information outlines justification for our proposed design: 1. The required storage and treatment volumes are achieved by the proposed design per Clearwaters drainage goals and policies; the proposed method is considered an acceptable standard Engineering practice and is beyond the requirements prescribed by SWFWMD, meeting the intent of Local and State requirements. Further, the proposed design meets the goals and objectives as outlined within the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan by providing a method that is a technically, environmentally, and economically viable method of treating stormwater runoff before final discharge to improve and enhance local surface waters. 2. The proposed development supports the goals and objectives of the City by providing additional parking and support for the surrounding businesses. Every effort has been made to provide a proposal that meets the intent of the Clearwater Community Development Code relating to drainage, site design and landscaping, together with a use that is allowable and reasonable for this site. Development of this site as anything other than an off - street parking lot is impractical given the land area; the proposed development plan is reasonable as any other use which requires a building would be impractical to develop on this 6,728 sq ft site. 3. The area of land assembled, even with the massing of the three vacant existing platted lots, is remarkably diminutive; in order for this site to be viable for development, the area of the land can not be further diminished by additional pond areas as the minimal remaining site area would be severely reduced, rendering the site completely impractical to develop. 4. The Clearwater Comprehensive Plan encourages infill development associated with parcels less than one acre in size and further recognizes .creative application of the code must be utilized to encourage development of these smaller parcels. This development plan meets the intent of the code as it relates to stormwater and drainage design while providing a reasonable development proposal. ORIGiML �Ais JEAN 2 7 2007 PLANNINGDEFARTWNT 1 C11YOF CLEARWATER f.. 5. The developers' decision to utilize a vault at a price of over $25,000.00 clearly determines that economic hardship is not the reason for this design choice; functionality and reasonable use of the land is the driving factor. For this site, without the use of a vault and pond with a retaining wall, undue hardship would be placed upon the developer and reasonable use of the land would be denied. The proposed vault and pond will provide the site and community with the desired water quality and attenuation, while making the best use of this uniquely small undeveloped property. For the reasons stated above, the installation of a pond large enough to meet the required 50 year storm would place undue hardship on the developer; rendering the site basically unfeasible to develop and therefore we respectfully request approval to utilize a vault and pond to properly and responsibly address the drainage for this site. NES #0724 — Meek Parking Lot — 6/27/07 RMR/rmr 2 ORIGINAL JUN 27 2007 9M%1NGDEf,%3MENY Cffy ®F.CLEARWATER 6 � Y Northside 5m#wvt6rq ,sew& j, Sac. CIVIL • LAND PLANNIN4 • ENVIRONMENTAL • STORMWATER REPORT FOR: MEEK PARKING LOT 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH @NORTHSIDEENCINEERIN6.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 PROJECT kawl,00Al.11'l Ram A. a1 A31 ..•� No *June 2( • �Praj�t�o 0 � JUN 2'7 2007 � R rLpNNINGiJLf*TMIEN' Clly ®F CLEARWATER DRAINAGE NARRATIVE The proposed construction activities consist of the following: • Construction of 4,697 S.F. of open impervious vehicular use and sidewalk area. • Construction of a stormwater pond to provide water quality treatment for a volume equal to V2" of runoff over the entire site. Treatment of stormwater will be achieved through natural percolation. • Construction of an underground retention vault to provide attenuation for the pre -post volume from the 50 year storm event. Overflow will pop -off into the Rogers Street Right -of -Way. • The more stringent of SWFWMD's 25yr / 24hr post - development flow not exceeding the 25yr / 24hr pre- development flow vs. Clearwater's weighted coefficient of runoff of stormwater detention was used to determine the storage volume requirement. It was found that the City of Clearwater's stormwater requirement (1,233 cf) was more strict than SWFVVMD's requirement and therefore was used in the design of the pond. • The Drainage Calculations have been prepared in accordance with the City of Clearwater Drainage Manual. • The project is located in an open basin. Construction of this project will not increase the existing peak discharge rate or volume. • No wetlands are located in or adjacent to the project area. No wetland impacts will result from construction of this project. R__ JUAN 27 2007 pC�j1YNOF G EAP ATER n PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO.: EXISTING CONDITIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= Meek Parking Lot 724 6,728 SF = 221 SF = 0 SF = 6,507 SF = 0.15 ACRES 0.01 ACRES 0.00 ACRES 0.15 ACRES 6,728 SF 221 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 6,507 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C = 0.21 T.O.C. = 60 MINUTES PROPOSED CONDITIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= 6,728 SF = 4,697 SF = 336 SF = 1,695 SF = 0.15 ACRES 0.11 ACRES 0.01 ACRES 0.04 ACRES 6,728 SF 4,697 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 336 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1,695 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C = 0.76 T.O.C. = 60 MINUTES 0.475 1 0.2 0.95 1 0.2 ORIGIML w1vo JUN 2 7 2007 pLMHjj4G DEpK<TMlNT Cgy OF CLEARWATEIR PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO.: Meek Parking Lot 724 POND 1 STAGE STORAGE DATA: T.O.B. EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= STAGE ft -NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 29.50 385 0.009 375 29.25 336 0.008 284 29.00 287 0.007 206 28.75 238 0.005 141 28.50 190 0.004 87 28.00 92 0.002 17 27.751 431 0.001 0 TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME = PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY VOLUME = VAULT STAGE STORAGE DATA: T.O.V. EL.= D.H.W. 50 EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= 6,728 SF 0.50 IN 280 CF 29.25 FT 284 CF STAGE ft -NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 29.75 595 0.014 1,190 29.50 595 0.014 1,041 29.25 595 0.014 893 28.75 595 0.014 595 28.50 595 0.014 446 28.00 5951 0.014 149 27.75 5951 0.0141 0 ORIGINAL. RECEIVID "IN 271007 PLANNING DEFARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES 50 YEAR STORM EVENT PROJECT: Meek Parking Lot PROJECT NO. 724 RUN -OFF COEFFICIENTS PRE - CONSTRUCTION I IN /HR DRAINAGE AREA = TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 6,728 SF 0.15 AC 60 MIN IMP. AREA= 221 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0.475 POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1 PERV. AREA= 6,507 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.2 C= 0.21 H = POST - CONSTRUCTION TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 6,728 SF 0.15 AC IMP. AREA= 4,697 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0.95 POND AREA= 336 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1 PERV. AREA= 1,695 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.2 C= 0.76 STORAGE CALCULATION PRE - CONSTRUCTION I IN /HR DRAINAGE AREA = 0.15 AC TIME OF CONC. Tc = 60 MIN I @ Tc =60 (50 YEAR EVENT)= 4.00 IN /HR Q(out) = C X I X A= 0.13 CFS POST - CONSTRUCTION 1,233 TIME MIN. I IN /HR Q(in) CFS INFLOW CF I OUTFLOW CF I STORAGE CF 60.00 4.001 0.471 1,698 4651 1,233 MAX. STORAGE = 1,233 CF WEIR DESIGN ORlC!NAL IWD TOP. OF WEIR ELEV.= 29.50 FT BOT. OF WEIR ELEV.= 29.25 FT JUN 27 2007 H = 0.25 FT or 3" Q = 0.13 CFS L =Q/3.1 *1111.5 = 0.33 FT or 4" WATER QUALITY DEPTH = 0.5 in. TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED = MAX. STORAGE REQUIRED = 1,233 CF TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED = MAX. STORAGE PROVIDED = 1,325 CF MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PROJECT NAME : 724 - Pollution Abatement Volume POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL Pond Length to Width Ratio (L /W) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Level Elevation of Pond Bottom Design High Water Level Elevation Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond /Exfiltration Trench Hydraulic Control Features: Groundwater Control Features - Y/N Distance to Edge of Pond Elevation of Water Level Impervious Barrier - Y/N Elevation of Barrier Bottom 43.00 ft2 284.00 ft3 6.00 21.38 ft 26.50 ft 27.75 ft 27.75 ft 29.25 ft 0.06 23.40 ft/d 2.00 35.10 ft/d 0.11 1.00 Top Bottom Left Right N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ORIGINAL PMD JUN 27 2007 p"NINGDE# MTMEN3 CTJYOF CLEARWATER MODRET TIME - RUNOFF INPUT DATA PROJECT NAME: 724 - POLLUTION ABATEMENT VOLUME STRESS PERIOD NUMBER INCREMENT OF TIME (hrs) VOLUME OF RUNOFF (ft3) Unsat 0.00 0.00 1 1.00 284.00 2 24.88 0.00 3 24.88 0.00 4 24.88 0.00 5 24.88 0.00 6 24.88 0.00 7 24.88 0.00 8 24.88 0.00 9 24.88 0.00 ORIGINAL IVBD JUN 27 2007 PLANNiNGDWARTMENI CITY OF CLEARWATEP MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS PROJECT NAME : 724 - Pollution Abatement Volume CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (ft3) 00.00-0.00 26.500 0.000 0.00000 0.00 26.500 0.04595 0.04435 1.00 28.407 0.04275 0.00 0.00292 12.85 27.750 0.00177 0.00 0.00063 50.75 26.732 0.00042 0.00 0.00021 75.63 26.633 0.00015 0.00 0.00009 100.50 26.591 0.00007 0.00 0.00005 125.38 26.568 0.00004 0.00 0.00003 150.25 26.554 0.00003 0.00 0.00003 175.13 26.542 0.00002 0.00 0.00001 200.00 26.535 0.00 ORIGINAL JeM 27 00 P1 ANNING DEPARTMENT "4E CLEARWATER Maximum Water Elevation: 28.407 feet @ 1.00 hours Recovery @ 12.847 hours * Time increment when there is no runoff WARNING Maximum Infiltration Rate: 20.237 ft /day Exceeds Vertical Permeability: 11.700 ft /day 2 2 2 2 7 M �.1 ca 1z 1 C 0 1 INFILTRATION : 724 - POLLUTION ABATEMENT VOLUME 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Time (hrs) Total Volume Infiltrated = 284 ft3 `— r OWE INFILTRATION : 724 - POLLUTION ABATEMENT VOLUME 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Time (hrs) Total Volume Infiltrated = 284 ft3 cy GULF COAST TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 5745 PARK BOULEVARD PINELLAS PARK, FL 33781 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFIED CERTIFIACTE of AUTHORIZATION # 00002370 PHONE: (727) 544 -4080 Vii. I.F 1FAX!, (72,,544-7532 -I a4i CLIENT: John H. Meeks Jr. LAB NO: 13107 PROJECT: NE Corner of Missouri Ave. & Rogers St., Clearwater, FL DATE REPORTED: 6/4/07 DATE TESTED: 6/4/07 LOCATION OF TEST: 48' E of Missouri Ave. x 48' N of Rogers St. DEPTH TO EXISTING WATER TABLE: Not Encountered within 10' Below Existing Ground Surface ESTIMATED SEASONAL HIGH WATER LEVEL:. 3'611 Below the Existing Ground Surface REMARKS: WATER TEMP: 73 deg. F WATER pH. 8.16 GROUND TEMP.: 70 deg. F •= INNER RING READINGS SOIL PROFILE 28.0 26.0 24.0 22.0 20.0 18.0 i 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 INCH PER HOUR I N' F I L T R A T 0 N R A T E .5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Elapsed Time (Hours) INFILTRATION RATE = 11.7 INCHES / HR. Respectfully Submitted, i Ground level R. Gunasekaran Fla. Reg. No. 20402 cc: John H. Meeks Jr. 2 Northside Engineering 1 File 1 Depth CLASSIFICATION to feet. (EXISTING SURFACE APPROX. ELEV.) 0'7" Brown SAND w/ Roots & Some Gravel Gray/Brown SAND w/ Occasional Roots 1' $" Light Gray/Brown SAND w/ Roots 2' 0" Light Brown SAND w/ Trace Roots Very Light Brown SAND w/ Trace of Fine Roots Very Light Grayish Brown Silty SAND 5' 2" (Damp Soil 65" — 74") Mottled Pale Brown Sandy CLAY w/ Orange Streaks Gray Sandy CLAY w/ Orange 8' -T?..' ... Streaks w/ Trace of Fine Roots Light Gray Sandy CLAY 10' 0" dote I ermtnatea at 120" qz TEST Depth 2' -9° 12 ring er I/ i/4 ring se �. Test Elevation x' t ° sz ,.,ei. ivkd- fym�y„ NS4�ci- :v:y,o�a rNn.dm"Lr'Si19.A�inGtFa7.�.kwF 24" Outer ring JUN 2 7 200 PIANNIN0'DQFARTMEN1 CITY OF CLEARWATER Northside g l"Ll`l f sm*"' %KC. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: June 27, 2007 To: Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: 1200 Rogers Street — Meek Parking Lot NES Proj# 724 Enclosed Mail Pick -Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment X For Your Approval For Your Information CIVIL • LAN® PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • We Transmit: • Originals • Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk 1 Check #3784 for $1,205.00 15 Flex. Development Application (Comp. Infill) 15 Letter of Authorization & Affidavit 15 Warranty Deed 15 Survey (1 signed and sealed) 15 Drainage Design Justification Narrative 15 Stormwater Report & Narrative (1 signed & sealed) 15 Comprehensive Landscape Program Application 15 8.5" X 11" Civil Site Plan 15 8.5" X 11" Color Landscape Plan 15 1 Civil & Landscape Drawings (7 sheets) (1 signed & sealed) Please feel ftRcTo- ontact me ) 443 -2869 if you have questions or required additional information. By: Renee Ruggiero, Project er Copies To: File; N. Pelzer, D. Williams " JUN 2 71001 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 P1ANNINGORMTPaNT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 CffV0FCLEARWATEp TECH @NORTHSIDEEN6INEERINC.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 Kurleman, Scott From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 11:42 AM To: Kurleman, Scott Cc: Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2007 -06024 - 1200 Rogers Scott, Suggested condition for DO: Prior to building permit, the applicant shall provide a handicap parking space in accordance with Community Development Code Section 3 -1408 and an accessible route from the public sidewalk to the building in accordance with the Florida Building Code Section 11- 4.3.2(1). D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562 -4781 ,V,�-. Wells, Wayne From: Renee Ruggiero [renee @northsideengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:46 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Watkins, Sherry Subject: 1200 Rogers Street _ Meek parking Lot Wayne and Sherry, Page 1 of 1 For the record....the address was assigned by Don when Steve Doherty and I met to discuss the site. Steve and I walked over to see Don together and the address was picked and written in some magic little book by Dons desk. Sherry, Dan stated you were having computer issues .... do we need to come back over or can you fax whatever information that was not available this morning ? No big deal either way, we can run over without a. problem.... just trying to save a trip. Hope you both have a great day! Renee Ruggiero, your friendly Project Planner Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland St, #930 Clearwater, FL 33755 T 727.443.2869 / F727.446.8036 6/28/2007 1401 lv LOTS 30B, 31A & 31B, LESS STREET RIGHT—OF—WAY, BLOCK R, HIBISCUS GARDENS, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGE 59 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CA. gn AR & K -S ui , 3N. z 0 0 0 u u 0 U) C RT ..... COURT ST COURT S` LU c/) ! A co 0, z 0 c/) ROGERS ST ROGERSE U) c/) cn 0 mp cz 0 i v'5 , pmA - pm, ow, V� nil m U) . L CG CG REQUIRED C CG USAGE. VACANT CIVIL SITE DATA PARKING LOT CIVIL SITE SPECIFICATION — — — — LOT AREA: 6,728 SF STAKING SITE PLAN 6,728 SF EXIST. CONTOUR 10,000 S.F. NEW ELEVATION 0.15 ACRE NEW CONTOUR 0.15 ACRE EXIST. STORM SEWER 0.23 ACRE LOT WIDTH: 75' NEW UNDERDRAIN 75' EXIST. SAN, SEWER loo, BUILDING COVERAGE: N/A EXIST. WATER SERVICE NIA NEW WATER SERVICE N/A (S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE) NEW SAN. MANHOLE NEW CLEAN—OUT(C.O.) m I on I C= I -10= C. 0. I 9= I om Em GROSS FLOOR AREA (S.F.): N/A N/A — — — — F. A. R.: NEW CONCRETE FRONT: I N/A WEST: 10' TO PAVEMENT 25' POINT OF CONNECTION OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST. SOUTH: 10' TO PAVEMENT M METER B. F. P. D. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE SETBACKS: SIDE: N/A DEPARTMENT CONNECTION EAST: 0' TO PAVEMENT T,&V. TAP 10, NORTH: 5' TO PAVEMENT REAR: N/A N/A 20' BLDG. HEIGHT: N/A N/A N/A PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA: 221 SF 4,562 SF (V.U.A.) IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO: 221 SF 4,612 SF 6,392 S.F. (I.S.R.) 0.03 0.68 0.95 OPEN SPACE: 6,507 SF 2,116 SF 336 S.F. (S.F. & Y. OF GROSS SITE) 96% 31% .05 PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING: N/A 206 S.F. OF V.U.A. (S.F. & % OF V.U.A.) 4.5% 10% PARKING: 0 SPACES 13 SPACES NIA LEGEND ORIGIMAL CIVIL SITE DATA C11.2 CIVIL SITE SPECIFICATION OCT 15 EXIST. ELEVATION C3.11 STAKING SITE PLAN PLANNING DEPA EXIST. CONTOUR i. CITY OF CLEAR NEW ELEVATION +10.00 NEW CONTOUR Li. I EXIST. STORM SEWER L2.1 NEW STORM SEWER =m cmu C= NEW UNDERDRAIN EXIST. SAN, SEWER NEW SAN. SEWER I cm i R= 1 =31 cm I In EXIST. WATER SERVICE NEW WATER SERVICE NEW INLET NEW SAN. MANHOLE NEW CLEAN—OUT(C.O.) m I on I C= I -10= C. 0. I 9= I om Em NEW BUILDING AREA NEW ASPHALT NEW CONCRETE TEMP. SILT BARRIER POINT OF CONNECTION OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST. M METER B. F. P. D. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE F.H.A. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY F, D. C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION T.B.O. TEMPORARY BLOW—OFF T,&V. TAP AND VALVE N 0 EX 0 F b"" H E E`TS Cl. I CIVIL SITE DATA C11.2 CIVIL SITE SPECIFICATION C2. i DEMOLITION SITE PLAN C3.11 STAKING SITE PLAN C4.1 GRADING, AND DRAINAGE SITE PLAN C5. i CIVIL SITE DETAILS Li. I LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN L2.1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS z Q EW PROPERTY OF THE IYAYWITHOUT NOT PUBLISHED 3 za S.W.F.W.M.D. / EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. DURING CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT IS TO REMAIN ON SITE, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES PRIOR TO INITIATING AND DURING ALL PHASES OF LAND CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT SOIL EROSION AND SILTATION. 2. THE RETENTION AREAS SHALL BE ROUGH GRADED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, WITH ALL STORM WATER DIRECTED TO IT. AFTER COMPLETION OF ALL WORK, REMOVE DEBRIS AND SILTATION FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE RETENTION BASIN, AND FINE GRADE THE FINAL SIX (6) INCHES AND SOD. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN THE SIDE SLOPE REQUIRED AND SHOWN ON PLAN, AND NOTIFY ENGINEER FOR AN INSPECTION PRIOR TO SODDING. 3. THE RETENTION AREAS AND OUTFALL CONTROL STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED EARLY IN THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD TO MITIGATE ANY ADVERSE WATER QUANTITY IN PARTS OFF SITE. 4. AFTER COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, THE OWNER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE STORMWATER FACILITIES. ACTIONS INCLUDED SHALL BE REGULAR MOWING OF THE BOTTOM AND SIDE SLOPES, PLUS PERIODIC INSPECTIONS AND REMOVAL OF DEBRIS, TRASH, ETC, THAT MAY BLOCK THE OPENINGS IN THE CONTROL STRUCTURES. 5. ALL DISTURBED CONDITIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO NATURAL CONDITIONS OR BETTER, 6. ALL SIDE SLOPES OF RETENTION OR SWAGE AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED BY VEGETATION OR OTHER MATERIALS TO MINIMIZE EROSION AND PROTECT THE STORMWATER BASIN. NOTE: PLAN CONFLICTS, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN, WITH OTHER EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS AND PROTECT OR REINSTALL ALL DISTURBED EXISTING UTILITIES, PHONE LINES, POWER LINES, POWER SUPPORT CABLES, SPRINKLER LINES AND CONTROLS, MECHANICAL PIPELINES OR UNDERGROUND POWER CABLES AND RETURN EXISTING CONCRETE WALKS, DUMPSTER PADS, FENCE, HANDRAIL, VALVES, HYDRANTS, GUY WIRES, ELECTRIC BOXES AND PIPELINES WHICH SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REINSTALLED AS INCIDENTAL TO THE COST OF WORK SHOWN HEREUNDER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS PRIOR TO AWARD OF THE CONTRACT. THE POND UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM SHALL BE INSPECTED ANNUALLY AND RETROFITTED AND FLUSHED SEMI- ANNUALLY. CLOGGED OR SPENT FILTER MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ALL MANNERS AS WITH THE HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE. THE SPENT FILTER MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A PERMITTED FACILITY. 1. SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURES: SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS, PERIMETER BERMS, FILTER FENCES, BERMS, SEDIMENT BARRIERS, VEGETATIVE BUFFERS AND OTHER MEASURES INTENDED TO TRAP SEDIMENT AND /OR PREVENT THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, OR INTO EXISTING WATER BODIES, MUST BE INSTALLED, CONSTRUCTED OR, IN THE CASE OF VEGETATIVE BUFFERS, PROTECTED FROM DISTURBANCE, AS A FIRST STEP IN THE LAND ALTERATION PROCESS. SUCH SYSTEMS SHALL BE FULLY OPERATIVE AND INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE ANY OTHER DISTURBANCE OF THE SITE BEGINS, 2. PROTECTION OF EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEMS: DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STORM SEWER INLETS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SEDIMENT TRAPS SUCH AS SECURED HAY BALES, SOD, STONE, ETC., WHICH SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND MODIFIED AS REQUIRED BY CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS, AND WHICH MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE INSTALLATION. 3. SEDIMENTATION BASIN: THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROHIBIT DISCHARGE OF SILT THROUGH THE OUTFALL STRUCTURE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF ANY RETENTION AREA AND WILL BE REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUT THE RETENTION AREA BEFORE INSTALLING ANY PERMANENT SUBDRAIN PIPE. IN ADDITION, PERMANENT RETENTION AREAS MUST BE TOTALLY CLEANED OUT AND OPERATE PROPERLY AT FINAL INSPECTION AND AT THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD, 4, SWALES, DITCHES AND CHANNELS: ALL SWALES, DITCHES AND CHANNELS LEADING FROM THE SITE SHALL BE SODDED WITHIN (3) DAYS OF EXCAVATION. ALL OTHER INTERIOR SWALES, ETC., INCLUDING DETENTION AREAS WILL BE SODDED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 5, PROTECTION AND STABILIZATION OF SOIL STOCKPILES: FILL MATERIAL STOCKPILES SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES BY ON -SITE DRAINAGE CONTROLS WHICH PREVENT EROSION OF THE STOCKPILED MATERIAL. CONTROL OF DUST FROM SUCH STOCKPILED MATERIAL, MAY BE REQUIRED, DEPENDING UPON THEIR LOCATION AND THE EXPECTED LENGTH OF TIME THE STOCKPILES CKPI O ALES WILL BE PRESENT. IN NO CASE SHALL UNSTABILIZED STOCKPILE REMAIN AFTER THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS. 6. MAINTENANCE: ALL EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY, ESPECIALLY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND WILL BE CLEANED OUT AND /OR REPAIRED AS REQUIRED. FILTER MEDIUM SPECIFICATIONS THE FILTER SAND SHALL BE WASHED MATERIAL MEETING F.D.O.T. ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SILICA AN S D A ND UARTZ GRAVELS, ELS OR MIXTURES THEREOF ( LE S S THAN ONE (1) PERCENT SILT, CLAY AND ORGANIC MATTER), UNLESS FILTER CLOTH IS USED WHICH IS SUITABLE TO RETAIN THE SILT, CLAY AND ORGANIC MATTER WITHIN THE FILTER; CALCIUM CARBONATE AGGREGATE IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE; AND HAVE AN EFFECTIVE GRAIN SIZE OF 0.20 TO 0,55 MILLIMETERS IN DIAMETER; A UNIFORMITY COEFFICIENT OF 1.5 R R 0 GREATER, RATE OF 0.125 CM /SEC. OR GREATER. IF THE PERMEABILITY RATE OF THE FILTER SAND IS LESS THAN 0.125 CM /SEC. A REPLACEMENT OF THE FILTER SYSTEM WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE SAND TESTED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONTRACTOR HAVE THE FILTER SAND TESTED AND APPROVED. 2, THE PERFORATED PIPE SHALL CONSIST OF POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) CONFORMING TO ASTM D 3033, HAVE MINIMUM OF SIXTEEN (16) 3/8 INCH DIAMETER PERFORATIONS PER LINEAR FOOT OF PIPE AND BE ON THE BOTTOM 135' OF THE PIPE, 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DEWATERING MEASURES AS REQUIRED DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE UNDERDRAIN AND ALL OF ITS COMPONENTS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BACKFILL THE DRAIN PIPE UNTIL THE ENGINEER HAS VERIFIED AND APPROVED THE DRAIN PIPE GRADES AND INSTALLATION OF FILTER MEDIA. 5. SWFWMD REQUIRES AS -BUILT CERTIFICATION BY THE ENGINEER FOR THIS FILTER SYSTEM. TEST REPORTS FROM AN APPROVED LABORATORY ON GRADATION AND PERMEABILITY SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE AS -BUILT SUBMITTAL. CLEARING AND GRUBBING NOTES 1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE CLEARING, ALL TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY'S TREE ORDINANCE AND DETAILS CONTAINED IN THESE PLANS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN THESE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION. NO TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PREPARE THE SITE PRIOR TO BEGINNING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE, WITH THE SOILS TESTING REPORT. COPIES OF THE SOILS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE OWNER OR THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY QUESTIONS REGARDING SITE PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SOILS REPORT ARE TO BE DIRECTED TO THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB, ONLY THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SITE, NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE SEEDED, MULCHED, OR PLANTED WITH OTHER APPROVED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE TOP 4" TO 6" OF GROUND REMOVED DURING CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE STOCKPILED AT A SITE DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER TO BE USED FOR LANDSCAPING PURPOSED, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. ONLY "GRADING BY HAND" IS PERMITTED WITHIN THE CANOPY LINE OF TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR REMOVING ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES, 7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES TO DISCONNECT OR REMOVE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO REMOVING OR DEMOLISHING. 8. ALL EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL METHODS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. 11. WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE RETENTION /DETENTION AREAS WILL BE RESHAPED, CLEANED OF SILT, MUD AND DEBRIS, AND RE- SODDED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE PLANS. 12. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL /SEDIMENTATION BARRIER (HAY BALES OR SILTATION CURTAIN) TO PREVENT SILTATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, STREETS, STORM SEWERS, WATERWAYS, AND EXISTING WETLANDS. WATER SYSTEM NOTES 1. ALL WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 36 INCHES OF COVER. 2. ALL WATER SYSTEM WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, 3. ALL DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.50 (AWWA C 150) AND ANSI A 21.31 (AWWA C 151) AND PIPE SHALL RECEIVE EXTERIOR BITUMINOUS COATING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.6, A 21.8 OR A 21.51 AND SHALL BE MORTAR LINED, STANDARD THICKNESS, AND BITUMINOUS SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.6 (AWWA C 104 -71). 4. ALL FITTINGS LARGER THAN 2" SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON CLASS 53 IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C -110 WITH A PRESSURE RATING OF 350 PSI. JOINTS SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C -111. FITTINGS SHALL BE CEMENT MORTAR LINED AND COATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C -104. 5. ALL PVC WATER MAINS 4" THROUGH 12" SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C -900. PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 15FO AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SDR 18 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D -2241. 6. WATER MAIN PIPING OF LESS THAN 4" SHALL BE PER ASTM D2241 -89. 7. ALL FITTINGS 2" AND SMALLER SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC WITH SOLVENT WELDED SLEEVE TYPE JOINTS. 8. ALL GATE VALVES 2" OR LARGER SHALL BE RESILIENT SEAT OR RESILIENT WEDGE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C509. 9: ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C502 AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LOCAL UTILITY AND FIRE MARSHALL. 10. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL TEMPORARY BLOW -OFFS AT THE END OF WATER SERVICE LATERALS TO ASSURE ADEQUATE FLUSHING AND DISINFECTION, 11. THRUST BLOCKING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL FITTINGS AND HYDRANTS AS SHOWN ON DETAILS. 12. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY CODES. 13. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL HAVE PURPLE COLOR PIPING AND LABELING ON THE PIPE TO INSURE DIFFERENTIATION FROM POTABLE WATER PIPING. _ ,1; If ., �. , r ., �� • E , , 1. ALL COMPONENTS OF THE WATER SYSTEM, INCLUDING FITTINGS, HYDRANTS, CONNECTION, AND VALVES SHALL REMAIN UNCOVERED UNTIL PROPERLY PRESSURE TESTED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER. PRESSURE TESTS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WATER DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY OWNER'S N ENGINEER AND WATER DEPARTMENT INSPECTORS 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PERFORMING TESTS. 2. NEW WATER MAINS AFTER COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION LL ION OF NEW WATER MAINS, S, PRESSURE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTION WATER SYSTEM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM CHLORINATION. SAMPLING OF NEW WATER MAINS SHALL CONFORM WITH COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT REQUIREMENTS AND RESULTS FORWARDED TO THE ENGINEER. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL A NEW WATER SYSTEM BE PLACED INTO SERVICE UNTIL CERTIFICATION BY THE ENGINEER HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND A RELEASE FROM COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT HAS BEEN ISSUED, SANITARYSEWER NOTES 1, ALL SANITARY SEWER MAINS & LATERAL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 36 INCHES OF COVER. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAINS & SERVICE LATERALS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE, SDR 35 OR AS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, 3. ALL SANITARY SEWER WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK WHICH REQUIRES CONNECTING NEW WORK TO EXISTING LINES OR APPURTENANCES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING CONNECTION POINT AND NOTIFY OWNER'S ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES. 5. PVC PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM SPECIFICATIONS DESIGNATION D- 3034 -77C, MA SDR 35. INSTALLATION OF SDR 35 PIPE SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM SPECIFICATION SECTION D2321. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPELINES SHALL BE SOLID GREEN IN COLOR. 6. ALL PVC FORCE MAINS SHALL BE CLASS 2000, SDR 21, COLOR GREEN, WITH A GREEN MAGNETIC TAPE A MINIMUM OF 2" WIDE, PLACED 1 FOOT BELOW THE PROPOSED GRADE. THE PRINTING ON THE MAGNETIC TAPE SHOULD READ "FORCEMAIN ". 7. ALL DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.50 (AWWA C 150) AND ANSI A21.51 (AWWA C 151). DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL RECEIVE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR BITUMINOUS COATING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A21.6,A21.8, ORA21,51. 8. ALL SANITARY SEWER E GRAVITY MAINS OR SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAINS THAT REQUIRE D.L.P. ARE TO BE POLYLINED OR EPDXY LINED. 9. ALL SANITARY SEWER COVERS SHALL BE TRAFFIC RATED FOR HS -20 LOADING, SANITARY SEWER TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 1, ALL GRAVITY SEWER PIPING SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A TELEVISION INSPECTION BY THE OWNER'S CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE INSPECTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM AN EXHLTRATION TEST ON ALL GRAVITY SEWERS INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATION AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE: 100 GPD PER INCH PIPE DIAMETER PER MILE. TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY FOR APPROVAL. COORDINATION AND NOTIFICATION OF ALL PARTIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. 3. ALL FORCE MAINS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATORY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. SAID TESTS ARE TO BE CREATED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND SUBMITTED TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY FOR APPROVAL. COORDINATION AND NOTIFICATION OF ALL PARTIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY, WATER /SEWER , C r. . _t LOCATION OF PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM MAINS FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS SECTION, THE PHASE "WATER MAINS" SHALL MEAN MAINS, INCLUDING TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS PIPING, CONVEYING EITHER RAW, PARTIALLY TREATED, OR FINISHED DRINKING WATER, FIRE HYDRANT LEADS, AND SERVICE LINES THAT ARE UNDER THE CONTROL OF A PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM AND THAT HAVE AN INSIDE DIAMETER OF THREE INCHES OR GREATER. (1) HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND SANITARY OR STORM SEWERS, WASTEWATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MAINS, RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINES, AND ON -SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEMS. (A) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF AT LEAST THREE FEET BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED STORM SEWER, STORMWATER FORCE MAIN, OR PIPELINE CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER REGULATED UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 62- 610,F.A.C. (B) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF AT LEAST THREE FEET, AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET, BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED VACUUM -TYPE SANITARY SEWER. (C) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF AT LEAST SIX FEET, AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET, BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED GRAVITY -OR PRESSURE -TYPE SANITARY SEWER, WASTEWATER FORCE MAIN, OR PIPING CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER NOT REGULATED UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 62 -610, F.A.C. THE MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN WATER MAINS AND GRAVITY -TYPE SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE REDUCED TO THREE FEET WHERE THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN IS LAID AT LEAST SIX INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER. (D) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL DDISSTANCE OF AT LEAST TEN FEET BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND ALL PARTS OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED "ON -SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM" AS DEFINED IN SECTION 381.0065(2), F.S., AND RULE 64E - 6.002, F.A.C. CONTINUED: INATERISEWER CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS (2) VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND SANITARY OR STORM SEWERS, WASTEWATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MAINS, AND RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINES. (A) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS CROSSING ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED GRAVITY -OR VACUUM -TYPE SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER SHALL BE LAID SO THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN 15 AT LEAST SIX INCHES, AND PREFERABLY 12 INCHES, ABOVE OR AT LEAST 12 INCHES BELOW THE OUTSIDE OF THE OTHER PIPELINE. HOWEVER, IT IS PREFERABLE TO LAY THE WATER MAIN ABOVE THE OTHER PIPELINE. (B) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS CROSSING ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED PRESSURE -TYPE SANITARY SEWER, WASTEWATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MAIN, OR PIPELINE CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER SHALL BE LAID SO THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN IS AT LEAST 12 INCHES ABOVE OR BELOW THE OUTSIDE OF THE OTHER PIPELINE. HOWEVER IT IS PREFERABLE TO LAY THE WATER MAIN ABOVE THE OTHER PIPELINE. (C) AT THE UTILITY CROSSING DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPHS (A) AND (13) ABOVE, ONE FULL LENGTH OF WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE CENTERED ABOVE OR BELOW THE OTHER PIPELINE SO THE WATER MAIN JOINTS WILL BE AS FAR AS POSSIBLE FROM THE OTHER PIPELINE, ALTERNATIVELY, AT SUCH CROSSINGS, THE PIPES SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT ALL WATER MAIN JOINTS ARE AT LEAST THREE FEET FROM ALL JOINTS IN VACUUM -TYPE SANITARY SEWERS, STORM SEWERS, STORMWATER FORCE MAINS, OR PIPELINES CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER REGULATED UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 62 -610, F.A.C., AND AT LEAST SIX FEET FROM ALL JOINTS IN GRAVITY-OR PRESSURE -TYPE SANITARY SEWERS, WASTEWATER FORCE MAINS, OR PIPELINES CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER NOT REGULATED UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 62 -610, F.A.C. (3) SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER MAINS AND SANITARY OR STORM SEWER MANHOLES. (A) NO WATER MAIN SHALL PASS THROUGH, OR COME INTO CONTACT WITH, ANY PART OF A SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE. (B) EFFECTIVE AUGUST 28, 2003, WATER MAINS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED OR ALTERED TO PASS THROUGH, OR COME INTO CONTACT WITH, ANY PART OF A STORM SEWER MANHOLE OR INLET STRUCTURE. WHERE IT IS NOT TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE OR ECONOMICALLY SENSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT (I.E., WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT IN THE ROUTING OF A WATER MAIN AND A STORM SEWER AND WHERE ALTERNATIVE ROUTING OF THE WATER MAIN OR THE STORM SEWER IS NOT TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE OR IS NOT ECONOMICALLY SENSIBLE), THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THIS REQUIREMENT (I.E., THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF CONFLICT MANHOLES), BUT SUPPLIES OF WATER OR PERSONS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT CONFLICT MANHOLES MUST FIRST OBTAIN A SPECIFIC PERMIT FROM THE DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART V OF THIS CHAPTER AND MUST PROVIDE IN THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT OR DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND DESIGN DATA ACCOMPANYING THEIR PERMIT APPLICATION THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: (1) TECHNICAL OR ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION FOR EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE. (2 A STATEMENT IDENTIFYING THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE. (3) ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN SUB - SUBPARAGRAPHS A. THROUGH D. BELOW. (A) EACH WATER MAIN PASSING THROUGH A CONFLICT MANHOLE SHALL HAVE A FLEXIBLE, WATERTIGHT JOINT ON EACH SIDE OF THE MANHOLE TO ACCOMMODATE DIFFERENTIAL SETTING BETWEEN THE MAIN AND THE MANHOLE, WITHIN EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE}, THE WATER MAIN PASSING THROUGH THE MANHOLE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A WATERTIGHT CASING PIPE HAVING HIGH IMPACT STRENGTH (I.E,, HAVING AN IMPACT STRENGTH (I.E., HAVING AN IMPACT STRENGTH AT LEAST EQUAL TO THAT OF 0.25- INCH -THICK DUCTILE IRON PIPE). (C) EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE SHALL HAVE AN ACCESS OPENING, AND SHALL BE SIZED, TO ALLOW FOR EASY CLEANING OF THE MANHOLE. (D) GRATINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL STORM SEWER INLETS UPSTREAM OF EACH CONFUCT MANHOLE TO PREVENT LARGE OBJECTS FROM ENTERING THE MANHOLE. W4 SEPARATION BETWEEN FIRE HYDRANT DRAINS AND SANITARY OR STORM SEWERS, WASTEWATER OR ORMWATER FORCE MAINS, RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINES, AND ON -SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEMS. NEW OR RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANTS WITH UNDERGROUND DRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE DRAINS ARE AT LEAST THREE FEET FROM ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED STORM SEWER, STORMWATER FORCE MAIN, OR PIPELINE CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER REGULATED UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 62 -610, F.A.C., AT LEAST THREE FEET, AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET, FROM ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED VACUUM -TYPE SANITARY SEWER, AT LEAST SIX FEET, AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET, FROM ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED GRAVITY OR PRESSURE -TYPE SANITARY SEWER, WASTEWATER FORCE MAIN, OR PIPELINE CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER NOT REGULATED UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 62 -610, F.A.C. AND AT LEAST TEN FEET FROM ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED "ON -SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM" AS DEFINED IN SECTION 381.0065(2), FS. AND RULE 64E- 6,002, F.A.C. (5) EXCEPTIONS, WHERE IT IS NOT TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE OR ECONOMICALLY SENSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IN SUBSECTION (1) OR (2) ABOVE, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THESE REQUIREMENTS IF SUPPLIES OF WATER OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICANTS PROVIDE TECHNICAL OR ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION FOR EACH EXCEPTION AND PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION FEATURES THAT AFFORD A SIMILAR LEVEL OF RELIABILITY AND PUBLIC HEALTH PROTECTION. ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION FEATURES, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING. (A) WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN IS BEING LAID LESS THAN THE REQUIRED MINIMUM HORIZONTAL DISTANCE FROM ANOTHER PIPELINE E EL E AND WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN IS CROSSING ANOTHER PIPELINE AND JOINTS IN THE WATER MAIN ARE BEING LOCATED LESS THAN THE REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM JOINTS IN THE OTHER PIPELINE. (1) USE OF PRESSURE -RATED PIPE CONFORMING TO THE AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION STANDARDS INCORPORATED 0 ED IN70 RULE 62- 555.330 F.A.C. FOR THE T - - 0 E 0 HER PIPELINE IF IT I S A GRAVITY OR VACUUM- TYPE M U TYPE PIPELINE. (2) P USE PELOF WELDED, FUSED, OR OTHERWISE RESTRAINED JOINTS FOR EITHER THE WATER MAIN OR THE OTHER (3j USE OF WATERTIGHT CASING PIPE OR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT AT LEAST FOUR INCHES THICK FOR EITHER THE WATER MAIN OR THE OTHER PIPELINE. (B) WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN IS BEING LAID LESS THAN THREE FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANOTHER PIPELINE AND WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN IS CROSSING ANOTHER PIPELINE AND IS BEING LAID LESS THAN THE REQUIRED MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE OTHER PIPELINE, EQ)UA USE OF PIPE OR CASING PIPE, HAVING HIGH IMPACT STRENGTH (I.E., HAVING AN IMPACT STRENGTH AT LEAST L 0 T OF 0.25-INCH-THICK DUCTILE IRON PIPE) OR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT AT LEAST FOUR INCHES THICK (FOR THE WATER MAIN, AND USE OF TO THAT OF00.25- INCHPTH PIPE, HAVING DUCTILE IRON IMPACT CONCRETE ENCASEMENT AT LEAST FOUR INCHES THICK FOR THE OTHER PIPELINE IF IT IS NEW AND IS CONVEYING WASTEWATER OR RECLAIMED WATER. GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 1. ALL DELETERIOUS SUBSTANCE MATERIAL, (I.E. MUCK, PEAT, BURIED DEBRIS), IS TO BE EXCAVATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER, OR OWNER'S SOIL TESTING COMPANY. DELETERIOUS MATERIAL IS TO BE STOCKPILED OR REMOVED FROM THE SITE AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER, EXCAVATED AREAS ARE TO BE BACKFILLED WITH APPROVED MATERIALS AND COMPACTED AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXCAVATING AGAINST COLLAPSE AND WILL PROVIDE BRACING, SHEETING, OR SHORING, AS NECESSARY. TRENCHES SHALL BE KEPT DRY WHILE PIPE AND APPURTENANCES ARE BEING PLACED, DEWATERING SHALL BE USED AS REQUIRED. 3. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE CLASS III (ASTM C -76) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. 4. PVC STORM PIPE, 12" AND SMALLER SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C -900, CLASS 150 STANDARDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE GRATES AND COVERS WITHIN TRAFFIC AREAS SHALL BE TRAFFIC RATED FOR HS -20 LOADINGS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO SOD THE RETENTION /DETENTION POND AS INDICATED ON PLANS WITHIN ONE WEEK FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF THE POND. 7. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR STREETS AND STORM DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY. 8. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO THE INVERT ELEVATION(S) OF THE STORM PIPES(S), STORM PIPE SHALL BE SAW -CUT EVEN WITH THE STRUCTURE WALL(S). GROUT AROUND PIPES FOR WATER TIGHT AND SMOOTH FINISH. PAVING GRADING & DRAINAGE TESTING AND IRPECTION REQUIREMENTS 1. THE STORM DRAINAGE PIPING AND FILTRATION SYSTEM SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A VISUAL INSPECTION BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE APPLICABLE TESTING WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER, TESTS WILL BE REQUIRED PURSUANT WITH THE TESTING SCHEDULE FOUND IN THE ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, THE SOILS ENGINEER MUST SUBMIT CERTIFICATIONS TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER STATING THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET. PINELLAS COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY NOTES 1. ALL R.O.W. INSTALLATIONS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PRACTICES REFERENCED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA UTILITIES ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL. 2, ALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MUST CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM STANDARDS SET DOWN IN PINELLAS COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT, ZONING AND /OR RELATED ORDINANCES, AND MINIMUM TESTING FREQUENCY REQUIREMENTS. 3. SIGNS AND BARRICADES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S "MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S "DESIGN STANDARDS" INDEXES 600 THROUGH 670 (LATEST EDITIONS). 4. INSTALLATION INVOLVING CONCRETE AND ASPHALT DRIVEWAY, IN GOOD CONDITION MUST BE ACCOMPLISHED BY JACK AND BORE OR PUSHING, NO JETTING IS ALLOWED. 5. COMPACTION FOR PIPE BACKFILL SHALL COMPLY WITH AASHTO T- 99(100 %). 6. DISTURBED AREA WITHIN THE R.O.W. WILL BE COMPACTED TO 100% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AND SODDED. 7. ANY PORTION OF THE ROADWAY THAT SUSTAINS EXCESSIVE CONSTRUCTION RELATED DAMAGE, IN THE OPINION OF PINELLAS COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR EXPENSE IN A MANNER SPECIFIED BY PINELLAS COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. 8. SAFE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC IS TO BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. 9. ANY SIDEWALK WHICH BECOMES UNDERMINED MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED. SIDEWALKS ARE TO BE RECONSTRUCTED WITHIN THREE(3) DAYS AFTER REMOVAL. WHEN EXISTING SIDEWALK IS REMOVED, IT IS TO BE REMOVED TO THE NEAREST JOINT. 10. NO STOCKING OF MATERIAL IN ROADWAY OR ON SIDEWALK; ALL DIRT OR DEBRIS WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE DAILY. ROADS AND SIDEWALKS ARE TO BE SWEPT DAILY AS PART OF DAILY CLEAN -UP. 11. SIGNS AND BARRICADES FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC PLAN REFERENCE INDEXES 600 THRU 605 ROADWAY & TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS. 12. SAW CUT EXISTING EDGE -OF- PAVEMENT PRIOR TO DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION. WORK IN FDOT RIGHTS-OF-WAY 1. DRIVEWAY TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO FDOT INDEX #515. 2. LOCATIONS WHERE DRIVEWAY APRONS ARE BEING REMOVED THE SIDWALK SEGMENT SHALL BE REGARDED AND REPLACED TO COMPLY WITH F.D.O.T. STANDARD INDEX # 310. 3. EROSION CONTROL AND SHOULDER SODDING SHALL CONFORM TO FDOT IND #104 & 105. 4. GUARDRAILS SHALL CONFORM TO FDOT IND #400. 5. ALL STRIPING SHALL BE LEAD FREE NON- SOLVENT BASED THERMOPLASTIC AND MEET ACCORDING TO THE FDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 711. 6. REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF FDOT SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 706. 7. ALL SIGNS WITHIN FDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF FDOT SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 700. 8. REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FDOT STANDARD INDEX NO. 17352. 9. STRIPING WITHIN FDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FDOT STANDARD INDEX NO. 17346. 10. NOT USED 11. SIGNING AND STRIPING WITHIN FDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD). 12. ALL WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT -OF -WAY CONFORM TO: A.) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION (LATEST EDITION), (aka: STANDARD SPECS). B.) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND UTILITY OPERATIONS FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS ON STATE MAINTAINED SYSTEMS. (LATEST EDITION) (aka: STANDARD INDEX). COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE INDICES IS REQUIRED. C.) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MANUAL OF UNIFORM MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS (LATEST EDITION), (aka: GREEN BOOK). 13. TRAFFIC CONTROL & SIDEWALK CLOSURE ARE TO BE PER FDOT INDICES #600 , 613 & 660. 14. APPLICANT MUST NOTIFY THE FLORIDA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION PINELLAS COUNTY MAINTENANCE OFFICE (48) HOURS IN ADVANCE OF STARTING PROPOSED WORK. CALL (727) 570 -5101. 15, BEFORE CONSTRUCTION IS TO BEGIN, THE APPLICANT SHALL DELIVER TO THE FLORIDA DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATION PROOF OF INSURANCE VERIFYING THAT THE APPLICANT OR THE APPLICANT'S CONTRACTOR HAS COVERAGE UNDER THE LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF F.A.C. RULE CHPT. 14- 96.007(5)(C)6. 16. ALL REFERENCES TO F'.D.O.T, STANDARD INDEX REFLECT THE 2006 EDITION. 17. DRIVEWAY MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPRISED OF A MIN. 6" THICK, 3000 PSI CLASS I NON. STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY NOTE IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PERFORM A SURVEY (ACCOMPANIED BY THE ARCHITECT AND OWNER) OF THE ENTIRE PROJECT AREA INCLUDING BUILDING(S) AND SITE IMMEDIATELY UPON OCCUPYING THE WORK AREA AND BY PHOTOGRAPHIC AND WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DETAILING ANY AREAS THAT ARE NOT IN A FIRST CLASS CONDITION (SURFACES THAT ARE UNBROKEN, NON - CRACKED, NON- RUSTING, WITHOUT CHIPS, WITHOUT SPLINTERS, OF TEXTURE MATCHING ITS SURROUNDING, WITH NEW APPEARING FINISHES, AND OPERATING AS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED OR INTENDED TO OPERATE) WHICH WILL REMAIN IN THEIR PRESENT CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE OWNER A COMPLETE PROJECT IN FIRST CLASS LA CONDITION MEETING INDUSTRY WIDE STANDARDS IN QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PROJECT AREA BUILDING(S) AND SITE (REGARDLESS OF WHETHER AN AREA IS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED WITHIN THE DRAWINGS AN SPECIFICATIONS D S EG CATIONS OR NOT TI } UNLESS A PARTICULAR AREA HAS BEEN DESCRIBED IN THE AFOREMENTIONED PHOTOGRAPHS AND WRITTEN DETAILS. CONTRACTOR HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT THE EXISTING BUILDING(S) UTILITIES AND SITE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT TIME FRAME, SHOULD, DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK, ANY AREA OF THE BUILDING(S) AND /OR UTILITIES AND /OR THE BUILDING(S) AND /OR UTILITIES AND /OR THE SITE BECOME DAMAGED AND THAT AREA WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT TO BE A PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND /0R REPLACE THE DAMAGED AREA TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ARCHITECT AND OWNER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. WATER SUPPLY SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER NATURAL AND LP GAS LINES ELECTRICAL POWER RECLAIMED WATER SUPPLY IRRIGATION LINES T.V. CABLES FIBER OPTIC CABLES TELEPHONE CABLES FIRE ALARM SYSTEM CABLES SECURITY WIRING CONTROL WIRING SITE UNDERGROUND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INCLUDING INSULATION IT WILL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE UNDERGROUND SERVICES BY CAREFUL HAND EXCAVATION ONLY UNLESS OTHER MEANS ARE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT AND OWNER BEFORE BEGINNING THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE OR REPAIR, PER SPECIFICATIONS, ANY AND ALL DAMAGED UNDERGROUND SERVICES AS LISTED ABOVE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. NOTE TO CONTRACTOR G C, f j. 5 2007 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CERTIFIED RECORD DRAWINGS, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR. THE RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW FINALPLI,T,lINC', DEPARTMENT GRADES FOR RETENTION BASIN(S), CONTROL STRUCTURE(S), INLETS & PIPES WITH aIDROF CLEARWATE & BOTTOM ELEVATIONS, INVERTS & DIMENSIONING OF SLOT & BAFFLE. LOCATIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF THE CERTIFIED RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER, THE AFOREMENTIONED RECORD DRAWING SHALL BE SUFFICIENT ENOUGH IN DETAIL TO BE ACCEPTABLE BY AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL THE WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE WORK. 2. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED FROM NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM (1988). 3. LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, AND OTHER FEATURES ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PREPARATION OF THESE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR WILL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND OTHER FEATURES AFFECTING THIS WORK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK THE PLANS FOR CONFLICTS AND DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PERFORMING ANY WORK IN THE AFFECTED AREA. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN AREAS OF BURIED UTILITIES, AND SHALL PROVIDE AT LEAST 48 HOURS NOTICE TO THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, IN ORDER TO PERMIT MARKING THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION, BY CALLING "SUNSHINE" AT 1 -800- 432 -4770 MINIMUM OF 2 DAYS AND MAXIMUM OF 5 DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL UTILITIES NOT INCLUDED IN THE "SUNSHINE" PROGRAM. 6. CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE VICINITY OF POWER LINES AND OTHER UTILITIES. 7. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MUST BE IN PLACE AND TESTED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO BASE AND SURFACE CONSTRUCTION. 8. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PERMIT AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AND SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ACCORDING TO AGENCY INSTRUCTION, 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR APPROVAL TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER; SHOP DRAWINGS ON ALL PRECAST AND MANUFACTURED ITEMS FOR THIS SITE. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL BEFORE INSTALLATION MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. ALL SHOP DRAWINGS ARE TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER. 10. AT LEAST THREE (3) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND APPROPRIATE AGENCIES, AND SUPPLY THEM WITH ALL REQUIRED SHOP DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR'S NAME, STARTING DATE, PROJECTED SCHEDULE, AND OTHER INFORMATION AS REQUIRED, ANY WORK PERFORMED PRIOR TO NOTIFYING THE ENGINEER, OR WITHOUT AGENCY INSPECTOR PRESENT, MAY BE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 11. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE SOLIDLY TAMPED AROUND PIPES IN 6" LAYERS UP TO A LEVEL OF AT LEAST ONE FOOT ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE. IN AREAS TO BE PAVED, BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100% MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY AASHTO T -99. 12. SITE WORK CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF AT LEAST 3,000 P.S.L IN 28 DAYS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. ALL PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PROPERTY AFFECTED BY THE WORK SHALL BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN EXISTING CONDITIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY THE PLANS. ADDITIONAL COSTS ARE INCIDENTAL TO OTHER CONSTRUCTION AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION IS TO BE ALLOWED. 14. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE SODDED, ARE TO BE SEEDED AND MULCHED TO DOT STANDARDS, AND MAINTAINED UNTIL A SATISFACTORY STAND OF GRASS, ACCEPTABLE TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER OF RECORD, HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. ANY WASHOUTS, REGRADING, RESEEDING, AND GRASSING WORK, AND OTHER ER ,SIGN" WORK REQUIRED, WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR, AT HIS EXPENSE, UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE, BY THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER OF RECORD, 15, THE SOILS ENGINEER IS TO SUPPLY THE ENGINEER WITH A PHOTOCOPY OF ALL COMPACTION TESTS, AND ASPHALT RESULTS. THE SOILS ENGINEER IS TO CERTIFY TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, IN WRITING, THAT ALL TESTING REQUIREMENTS, REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY, AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT), FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS, AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A COPY OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND PERMITS AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. I Z THESE DRAWINGS DO NOT INCLUDE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR MEANS AND METHODS FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE SAFETY. 18, ALL SODDING, SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL INCLUDE WATERING AND FERTILIZATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THESE AREAS UNTIL THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER. 1. TRENCH EXCAVATION z k I - INCLUDE OSHA STANDARD 29 CFR, SECTION 1926.650 SUBPART P, WHICH IS 19. ALL PIPE LENGTHS ARE PLUS OR MINUS. PIPE MEASUREMENTS ARE CENTER TO 4 j Checked 1 NOW A PART OF LAWS OF FLORIDA CHAPTER 90 -96. CENTER OF STRUCTURES OR FITTINGS, PIPE MEASUREMENTS FOR MITERED END - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WRITTEN ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE SECTIONS ARE TO END OF PIPE. WITH THIS LAW. 20, EXISTING PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAW -CUT WHERE NEW PAVEMENT IS TO BE ADDED - A SEPARATE COST ITEM IDENTIFYING THE COST OF COMPLIANCE, OR EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE ELIMINATED. - A TRENCH SAFETY SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR, AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 21, ADJUSTMENTS OF INLETS, JUNCTION BOXES, MANHOLE TOPS, WATER VALVES, WATER 2: ALL RETENTION AREAS, STORM SEWER PIPING, STORM SEWER STRUCTURES, ETC. METERS, ETC., SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACTOR'S BID AND NO CLAIM MUST BE IN PLACE AS PART OF THE FIRST PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. SHALL BE MADE AGAINST THE OWNER OR ENGINEER FOR THESE ADJUSTMENTS, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ACCOMMODATE POSITIVE IF REQUIRED. DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TO AVOID FLOODING OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ANY FLOODING THAT MAY OCCUR DUE TO HIS WORK WILL BE 22. ALL BACKFILL OVER ANY PIPE (STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, OR WATERLINES) THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR THAT IS INSTALLED UNDER ROADWAYS OR WITHIN THE EMBANKMENT OF THE ROADWAY, 3. THE USE OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED DATA IS INTENDED FOR INFORMATIONAL SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH F.D.O.T. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, PURPOSES ONLY AND NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SECTION 125 -8.3, LATEST EDITION. MUST UTILIZE SIGNED AND SEALED DOCUMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION, PAVING NOTES 23. THE CONTRACTOR PERFORMING TRENCH EXCAVATION, IN EXCESS OF 5' FEET IN DEPTH, SHALL COMPLY WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION'S 1. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO SUBMIT A (OSHA) TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY STANDARDS, 29 C.F.R., S.1926.650, SUBPART P, PROPOSED JOINTING PATTERN TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL. INCLUDING ALL SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS OR UPDATES TO THE STANDARDS AS ADOPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY (DLES). 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE A 1/2" BITUMINOUS EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL WITH SEALER, AT ABUTMENT OF CONCRETE AND ANY STRUCTURE. 24. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE POINTS OF CONNECTIONS OF THE UTILITIES WITH 3, ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE MADE WITH TRAFFIC PAINT IN ACCORDANCE DIFFERENT SUBS. SITE CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT THE UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURES TO FDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 971 -12. PARKING STALL STRIPING i.e. SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, WATER LINES, FIRE LINES, ETC., TO 5' OUTSIDE TO BE 4" WIDE PAINTED WHITE STRIPES, OF THE BLDG(S). THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR TO CONNECT AND MEET THE INVERT ELEVATIONS OF THE SAID UTILITIES. ANY UTILITY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN 5' OF THE 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL EXTRA BASE MATERIAL WHEN THE DISTANCE BLDG. SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. ALL WORK BETWEEN THE PAVEMENT ELEVATION AND THE TOP OF THE PIPE OR BELL IS LESS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES, THAN TWELVE (12) INCHES. ORDINANCES AND REQUIREMENTS. 5. STANDARD INDEXES REFER TO THE LATEST EDITION OF FDOT "ROADWAY AND 25. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED AND FINISHED IN A WORKMANLIKE MANNER TO TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS. COMPLETE SATISFACTION OF THE ARCHITECT /ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH 6. PAVEMENT IN THE PROPERTY SHALL CONSIST OF 1 -1/2" ASPHALT, TYPE MEETING CURRENT THE BEST RECOGNIZED TRADE PRACTICES. FOOT STANDARDS, ON 6" LIMEROCK BASE COMPACTED TO 987. OF MAXIMUM DENSITY, ON 26. DEVIATIONS TO THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER SUB -BASE COMPACTED TO 98% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY PER AASHTO T -180. MAY BE CAUSE FOR THE WORK TO BE UNACCEPTABLE. DEVIATIONS SHALL RECEIVE 7, PAVEMENT IN R.O.W. AND TRUCK ROUTE PAVEMENT SHALL CONSIST OF WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. 2" ASPHALT, TYPE MEETING CURRENT FOOT STANDARDS ON 8" LIMEROCK BASE COMPACTED 27. SIGNS, BUFFER WALLS & FENCES ARE SUBJECT TO SEPARATE SUBMITTAL(S) AND TO 98% OFMAXIMUM DENSITY, ON 10-1/2" SUB BASE STABILIZED TO 40 LBR AND PERMITTING. DEVIATIONS SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. COMPACTED TO 98% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY PER AASHTO T -180. 8. EXISTING ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED MAY BE CRUSHED & USED UNDER 6" LIMEROCK FOR FILL W/ ENGINEER'S APPROVAL, THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT SERVO ' d ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE RE ODO ID, BL THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINE iiQ•,` V L, m Y "'y �k : "` 9TT7 I ,.� „ AT . ~¢m I Riil-A n.0f .1., 5 ,i COPIES OF TH�S Li V * P EMBOSSEDWITH°%LE:SItS; TWC .," ,;, . . i ! '. i , " _..�«. z k I I, I I 4 j Checked 1 L_ Issue D. 0, 1 z r T b ( I T � T t I' ( S y f s } ( IW 15 1. d I< ' ) 6 I 91 I I r ..r. N THE PROPERTY OF THE D IN INY WAY WITHOUT rft_20 NOT PUBLISHED 1 . , � 3 2007 C. REMOVE C SILT FENWT)_f� BARRIER NOTE: ��T �k0] ��T�O/ �� /�T �� 8V P�&�� ' FENCES '^'� �'`��'�'' ��'''''�� '~�''��'^� '~~�^' ^�� "' PLACE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND BE MA8V7A8VE0 THE "I ACKNOWLEDGE THE PLACEMENT & LOCATION OF ALL MEASURES THIS PLAN REQUIRES TO CONTROL TURBIDITY & EROSION FORAHIS SITE. THIS PLAN SHALL BE M DE AVAILABLE TO SITE CONTRACTOR" DATE. PROJECT. , " \ LA DEMOLITION OF THE SITE INCLUDES THE R cmuv RELOCATION ----- OF ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA, � PAVING AND BASE, UTILITIES LINES (SANITARY 3BNER. STORM PIPES, WATER L|NES, POWER POLES, OVERHEAD AND UNDER- CR0UND POWER AND TELEPHONE CABLES, GAS LINES, TREES' SHRUBS, ETC.) AND |5 NOT LIMITED TO WHAT'S SHOWN, -- — -- -- x� SHIL" STREET (P) AKA IPT%OGERS %53 TREE STEEL DOWEL ROD HAY BALE — '-- �� BALE � kU��D �� DETAIL 6' MAX to OPTIONAL POST POSITION 0 OR DEMOLITION NOTES LEGEND DEMOLITION OF THE SITE INCLUDES THE OF REMOVE: ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT AREA, PAVING AND BASE, UTILITY LINES (SANITARY CONCRETE SEWER, STORM P|PES, WATER LINES, POWER POLES, OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND POWER AND TELEPHONE CABLES` 0A3 LINES, TREES' SHRUBS, ETC] AND IS L�J REMOVE —n [T CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON. Cl| REMOVE ASPHALT AND BASE. 6' MAX to OPTIONAL POST POSITION 0 OR DEMOLITION NOTES LEGEND DEMOLITION OF THE SITE INCLUDES THE OF REMOVE: ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT AREA, PAVING AND BASE, UTILITY LINES (SANITARY CONCRETE SEWER, STORM P|PES, WATER LINES, POWER POLES, OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND POWER AND TELEPHONE CABLES` 0A3 LINES, TREES' SHRUBS, ETC] AND IS L�J 5 ALL C/VTR' & EXCAVATION RESULTING FROM REMOVAL OF TREES, SHRUBS, PIPES, INLETS, GREASE TRAPS, S|GN, AND POLE BASE SHALL BE FILLED WITH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL AND COMPACTED IN 12^ LIFTS TO 95% OF MAX DENSITY. 6 OFF—SITE DISPOSAL OF STRUCTURES, UTILITIES AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL OCCUR IN SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES APPROVED BY F.D.E.P., AND P|NELLAS COUNTY. POST OPTIONS: 2.x4^ OR 25"D WOOD; 1.33L0S,/F[ MIN. STEEL FILTER FABRIC IN CONFORMANCE WITH SEC. 085 F.D.0.T, SPECS. OR EQUAL EXIST. GROUND PRINCIPAL POSITION, CANTED 20* TOWARD FLOW n/�n Funp� FILTER ''~''— > SILT FLOW EXIST. GROUND REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON. Cl| REMOVE ASPHALT AND BASE. [�J REMOVE CURBING T0 THE NEAREST EXPANSION JOINT. REMOVE EXISTING POWER POLE 5 ALL C/VTR' & EXCAVATION RESULTING FROM REMOVAL OF TREES, SHRUBS, PIPES, INLETS, GREASE TRAPS, S|GN, AND POLE BASE SHALL BE FILLED WITH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL AND COMPACTED IN 12^ LIFTS TO 95% OF MAX DENSITY. 6 OFF—SITE DISPOSAL OF STRUCTURES, UTILITIES AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL OCCUR IN SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES APPROVED BY F.D.E.P., AND P|NELLAS COUNTY. POST OPTIONS: 2.x4^ OR 25"D WOOD; 1.33L0S,/F[ MIN. STEEL FILTER FABRIC IN CONFORMANCE WITH SEC. 085 F.D.0.T, SPECS. OR EQUAL EXIST. GROUND PRINCIPAL POSITION, CANTED 20* TOWARD FLOW n/�n Funp� FILTER ''~''— > SILT FLOW EXIST. GROUND THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT Q N %�UAAILRERALNTHEPROPENTYOFTHE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE RERR UC.Ei)* PSM OR USEEYIN ANYWAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGIN!E� 0 �lt SQ)cdlPwRIGH*r2007 NOT PUBLISHED Cl COPIES OF EMBOSSED Laimartm iU VMS THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT Q N %�UAAILRERALNTHEPROPENTYOFTHE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE RERR UC.Ei)* PSM OR USEEYIN ANYWAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGIN!E� 0 �lt SQ)cdlPwRIGH*r2007 NOT PUBLISHED Cl COPIES OF EMBOSSED Laimartm err ue cam- vl Im o X 11 NEW ASPHALT PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPE NEW CONCRETE 0 m Mr NES Comm.: il Drawn By., 46' W.F.H. NEW STOP BAR --PER NEW LAND CITYS �(A PE AS REQUE57�—_ X SIM" blup SIGN L C3 r3 _E3 NEWS-' 89,15,59 "w NEW"5" • All� 50 P &M) 'CONC.'.WALK CONC'WALK '15) S 89*15 9 NEW 20'X20' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE L NEW RETENTION PONE) 49'LONG RELOCATE EX j3 f NEW ADA POWER-P6 POLE TRUNCATED DOMES AS COMPLIANT RAMP PER, FP0 T:lND4_X NO, 304 NEW ASPHALT PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPE NEW CONCRETE 0 m Mr THIS DRAWING 15 AN INSTRUME�`Or,% . EP Rd �'46.�REMARVFHE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE I EPRd E 1p krL&LS 8 h5 ©R USER JAANY WAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEEI tl�,COPUIGkT607 NOT PUBLISHED COPIES OF TRESS EMBOSSED WITH a NES Comm.: il Drawn By., �ecked By. W.F.H. THIS DRAWING 15 AN INSTRUME�`Or,% . EP Rd �'46.�REMARVFHE PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE I EPRd E 1p krL&LS 8 h5 ©R USER JAANY WAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEEI tl�,COPUIGkT607 NOT PUBLISHED COPIES OF TRESS EMBOSSED WITH a ,1 SIM" ,1 sl SILT FENC� Ty,� BARRIER NEW 20'X20' SIGHT— VISIBILITY TRIANGLE TYR 7 ) I EA, 5. =I- M ALUMINUM HANDRAIL PER FDOT INDEX 520 O =_j 111 IL�; 'H ffl 1!1_11 T-I - OVERFLOW app 4 klt i 'Fil .- '711 NEW RETENTION——— 61i Iii ifs VAULT T- 1 =Ei =—I 777, IT, Y r�: I 7-;1 IF u:it SIZE # 57 CRUSHED STONE ( 6 " THICKNESS MAX.) — LLJ _1�3 20'X20' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES Q) Q) �jl Q_ v t- LA 50.00' P&M) 9" s 915 � c` Hl- 1 AL A p R A; IV UMINUM SKIMMER EX, GROUND MATCH EX. EX, CURB EXISTING "'**NEW 5 S1W PAVEMENT SECO'BrION A,.A,,. WEIR N.T.S. DETAIL N.T.S. ?9.25 I Ail ssue Date: 06/21/07 on im (�i THE PROPERTY 0FTHE p ANY WAY WITHOUT ;t2007 NOT PUBLISHED JOCT 13 20k 1I.— 2 Z'l ry 501-09'(M)50100�(P&I')� -1-.--!��-, N 9115 59 E(C&M IN ------ - -------- -- 13 ---------- A A <1 WAD SILT FENC(TYP.)` BARRIER VOL-- IM EM3 M C3 32.5 X I- _X L� J D, L) -JI L) NEW 20'X20' SIGHT— VISIBILITY TRIANGLE TYR 7 ) I EA, 5. =I- M ALUMINUM HANDRAIL PER FDOT INDEX 520 O =_j 111 IL�; 'H ffl 1!1_11 T-I - OVERFLOW app 4 klt i 'Fil .- '711 NEW RETENTION——— 61i Iii ifs VAULT T- 1 =Ei =—I 777, IT, Y r�: I 7-;1 IF u:it SIZE # 57 CRUSHED STONE ( 6 " THICKNESS MAX.) — LLJ _1�3 20'X20' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES Q) Q) �jl Q_ v t- LA 50.00' P&M) 9" s 915 � c` Hl- 1 AL A p R A; IV UMINUM SKIMMER EX, GROUND MATCH EX. EX, CURB EXISTING "'**NEW 5 S1W PAVEMENT SECO'BrION A,.A,,. WEIR N.T.S. DETAIL N.T.S. ?9.25 I Ail ssue Date: 06/21/07 on im (�i THE PROPERTY 0FTHE p ANY WAY WITHOUT ;t2007 NOT PUBLISHED JOCT 13 20k 1I.— 2 Z'l ry NEW 20'X20' SIGHT— VISIBILITY TRIANGLE TYR 7 ) I EA, 5. =I- M ALUMINUM HANDRAIL PER FDOT INDEX 520 O =_j 111 IL�; 'H ffl 1!1_11 T-I - OVERFLOW app 4 klt i 'Fil .- '711 NEW RETENTION——— 61i Iii ifs VAULT T- 1 =Ei =—I 777, IT, Y r�: I 7-;1 IF u:it SIZE # 57 CRUSHED STONE ( 6 " THICKNESS MAX.) — LLJ _1�3 20'X20' SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES Q) Q) �jl Q_ v t- LA 50.00' P&M) 9" s 915 � c` Hl- 1 AL A p R A; IV UMINUM SKIMMER EX, GROUND MATCH EX. EX, CURB EXISTING "'**NEW 5 S1W PAVEMENT SECO'BrION A,.A,,. WEIR N.T.S. DETAIL N.T.S. ?9.25 I Ail ssue Date: 06/21/07 on im (�i THE PROPERTY 0FTHE p ANY WAY WITHOUT ;t2007 NOT PUBLISHED JOCT 13 20k 1I.— ry IN SEE PLAN PLACE SOD 1/2" BELOW PAVEMENT FIN. nnxuc pmon To soun/wG NEW Aspn^L' POSITIVE DRAINAGE (*:1 MAX) AND BASE --\ iA ,- wscr EX. compm:nEo cnouwo SEE PLAN LAN PLACE SOD 1/2" BELOW PAVEMENT FIN. :nAos pnmx NEW ASPHALT To soomwu AND BASE -\ | poS/rwc omww^sc (+:/ MAX) TYPE MEETING MEET EX, COMPACTED GROUND GROUND TRANSITION AT THE PROPERTY LINE. 1-12" CUR �ENT FDOT STANDARDS ASPHALT @ 1/4 PER F[ MIN. EXCEPT AS NOTED 6^ UM[ROCK BASE F.D.O.T. CERTIFIED ~^''~'�-," �umr*C/cu 'u DENSITY 4ASHT0 T-180 `----- SUBBASE STABILIZED 40 L.B.R. COMPACTED TO 08% MAX. DENSITY AASHT0 T-180 C(}NC SIDEWALK 12'1 MAX _I EFL6SH CURB m, �0110 WIN MIN- - W.P.4 �� F NEW ASPHALT AND BASE� ------ PLACE SOD 1/2^ BELOW PAVEMENT RN. GRADE PRIOR TO SODDING POSITIVE DRAINAGE AiTil FILL GROUND AROUND BLDG. T0 3' BELOW RN. FLOOR ELEVATION 8c SOD 1" BELOW EDGE OF WALK MAX. SLOPE 41 MIN. SLOPE 2% HANDICAP [A V[ SIDEWALK [-k]F\|k|/` `}|L/L_VV��L_[\ L_|�L/||�� COMPACTED GROUND � ASPHALT @ 1/4^ PER FT. MIN. EXCEPT AS NOTED PLACE CONC. 4" BELOW FLOOR ELEV. EXCEPT AT DOORS REMAIN FLUSH. EXPANSION JOINT SLOPE AT 1/4^ PER FOOT 10:1 MAX. SLOPE SOD NOTES: ), pnovmcsxn*x4^ THICK CONC, SLAB 0 ALL EMERGENCY EXITS. 2. CONFORM TO ABOVE DETAIL FOR PLACING WALKS AT THE BLDGS, 1/, A!" � 111311114 Nttl; NEW SURFACE EXIST. SURFACE REPAIR OF PAVEMENT NOTES: 1. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT SMALL BE MECHANICALLY SAWED AND ALL SURFACES TACK CO/TED. 2 EXISTING SURFACE AND THICKNESS; WITH MIN. Of. ' ~~'`'~~^ '~ ~� CONSISTENT '' DOT TYPE S-3. ~' COMPACTED LAYERS p*Sn|u REPORTS l5[�CED \N �/ COMPACTED '' ~~^ ~^ FOR TRENCH ��BDENSITY AS DETERMINED BY Sf T-08, LAB REPORTS ARE REQUIRED. EXIST. SURFACE 3Aw-CUT EXIST. EDGE OF PAVEMENT @% BASE NEW SURFACE EXIST. BASE NEW BASE NEW SUBBASE L,41 COMPACTED FILL OR UNDISTURBED SOIL 3,000 PSAR� CONCRETE k--6� �R^~ r`/_/uv//`J/v vr,.,`_. -- 5^ OPENING )VERFLOw fVEL 29.25 30TTO IEV, 27.75 SIZE # 57 CRUSHED STONE F--im--- A --------------------------------------- L.C.- /� � rK VIEW [�[-7-[�K]7-|��k] VAULT /`L_ | L-|� | )��/x N.T.S. ^^"^^^^^^^v THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OFSERVI HALL MAIN Efflkc ENGINEER. AND SHALL NOT BE REPI D�44USHED %JSED.I. AM' THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. G-4-21 COPIES OF THESE P NLESS EMBOSSED MnTH Fifflw z,nFTHE r PUBLISHED Mal MEDIUM BROOM FINISH GRADE TO FINISH CONC. WALK 1" BELOW EDGE OF WALK FINISH GRADE TO 1" BELOW I MEDIUM BROOM EDGE OFWALK FINISH CONC. WALK 2' LEVEL VEL )LDER VARIES (SEE PLAN) SHOULDER EXPANSION JOINT SOD I SLOPE 1/4"PER FOOT SOD 1-1/2^ RADIUS VERTICAL CURB PAVING \--- COMPACTED FILL OR UNDISTURBED SOU BASE COMPACTED SUBBASE NOTE: NOTE: WHEN SIDEWALK IS PROVIDE 1/4^ PROVIDE 1/4' TO BE REMOVED &/OR CONTROL JOINTS CONTROL JOINTS NEW SIDEWALK 15 TO 0 4'0.C..5' O.C.. �� 4'0. C., 5` O.C.. BE ADDED, IT IS TO 8' OC OR 12` 0C 8' OC OR 12' O.C. ' '� BE REMOVED T0 THE NEAREST EXPANSION &c 1 -2''� B�UW|N0-3' / u �� 1/2 BITUMINOUS J0|NT, EXPANSION JOINTS EXPANSION JOINTS @ 40' O.C. FOR 4' @ 40' O.C. FOR 4' SIDEWALKS, 50' O.C. SIDEWALKS, 50' O.C. FOR 5' OR GREATER. FOR 5' OR GREATER. �� WALK ��UU ��un�u°�n�"°=�=��°�� R^~ r`/_/uv//`J/v vr,.,`_. -- 5^ OPENING )VERFLOw fVEL 29.25 30TTO IEV, 27.75 SIZE # 57 CRUSHED STONE F--im--- A --------------------------------------- L.C.- /� � rK VIEW [�[-7-[�K]7-|��k] VAULT /`L_ | L-|� | )��/x N.T.S. ^^"^^^^^^^v THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OFSERVI HALL MAIN Efflkc ENGINEER. AND SHALL NOT BE REPI D�44USHED %JSED.I. AM' THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. G-4-21 COPIES OF THESE P NLESS EMBOSSED MnTH Fifflw z,nFTHE r PUBLISHED Mal L.C.- /� � rK VIEW [�[-7-[�K]7-|��k] VAULT /`L_ | L-|� | )��/x N.T.S. ^^"^^^^^^^v THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OFSERVI HALL MAIN Efflkc ENGINEER. AND SHALL NOT BE REPI D�44USHED %JSED.I. AM' THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. G-4-21 COPIES OF THESE P NLESS EMBOSSED MnTH Fifflw z,nFTHE r PUBLISHED Mal 9. SILT FENC BARRCIR TYP_ GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL COMMON CONT CAL 517E DETAIL KEMAKK5 Ilex ca5sine Dahoon Holly 45 gal 2.5"Cal I O'oa 2/1-1.2 Magnolia cyandiflora 'D.D. Blanchard' TM Southern Magnolia 45 gal 2.5"Cal IO'ca 2/1-1.2 Taxodium di5tichum Bald Cypress 45 gal 2.5"Cal I O'oa 2/L1 .2 UImu5 parvifolia 'Allee' BOTANICAL Khaphiolepi5 inclica 'Alba' Viburnum obovatum Viburnum 5u5pen5um BOTANICAL FA 3 13 5f Fa5palum notatum 'Argentine' Allee Lacelgark f-Im 45 gal 2.5"Cal I O'oa 2/L1.2 COMMON CONT FIELD2 DETAIL REMARKS White Indian Hawthorn 3 VI 1411 IILI.2 Walter's Viburnum 3 coal 1511 5anciankwa Viburnum 3 gal 24"oa 111-1.2 COMMON CONT KEMARK5 Bahia Grass sod fig .1 ti .1 WATER 4" HIGH AT SHRUB, NO WATER WELL AT LAWN AREA. N Za° I. `II J + �Q< - <L (D Q 0LLn M 00 QQQ Wr 1" = 1' -0" w w r r w J ~ < x 0 n m Q� �(0 z a ' ! • • : 1 2 X ROOTBALL 12" AT 1 GALLON 22" AT 5 GALLON 32" AT 15 GALLON SET ROOTBALL CROWN 1 " HIGHER THAN SURROUNDING FINISHED GRADE. SLOPE FINISHED GRADE AT BACKFILL AWAY FROM ROOTBALL. MULCH TO 2" DEPTH AT WATER WELL. FINISHED GRADE. �- PLANT TABLETS AS NOTED OR SPEICIFIED. ``-- BACKFILL MIX, SEE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS. NATIVE SOIL MIX FIRMLY COMPACTED. 32 9333.13 -01 DOUBLE STAKE WITH WIRE: #12 GALVANIZED WIRE THROUGH THE EYE OF "CINCH -TIE" RUBBER SUPPORT. 2 " DIAMETER LODGEPOLE PINE TREATED TREE STAKES. SET PERPENDICULAR TO PREVAILING WIND. REMOVE NURSERY STAKE BY THE END OF MAINTENANCE. 1X3 CROSSTIE, AVOID RUBBING INJURY TO TRUNK. ROOT BALL BACKFILL PLANTING AS PER PLANTING DETAIL. AVOID DAMAGE TO THE ROOT BALL WITH THE SUPPORT STAKES. 16" SET ROOTBALL CROWN 1 1/2" HIGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING FINISHED GRADE. SLOPE BACKFILL AWAY FROM ROOTBALL FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE. xx X- ° ° °' + "CINCH- TIE ", "GRO- STRAIT ", IL TURF AREAS. OR EQUAL FLEXIBLE RUBBER <<m m m ; KEEP TURF CLEAR FOR TREE TIES IN FIGURE EIGHT '- Uj KEEP MULCH 6" - 8" I I Q ,III I W/ TWO GALV. ROOFING NAILS. x 0 L N ROOTBALL - M .- <t 2" LODGEPOLE PINE TREATED c ¢ - TREE STAKES. SET STAKES M �- f- <<< ¢ ItECESS TURF AREA APPROXIMATELY 120 DEGREES 6" HIGH WATER 0 0 _ - co r- PLANT TABLETS AS C\j N N n NOTED OR SPEICIFIED. BACKFILL MIX, SEE 2X ROOTBALL FINISHED GRADE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS. 32" AT 15 GALLON NATIVE SOIL MIX 48" AT 24" BOX FIRMLY COMPACTED. GALLON 60" AT 30" BOX ,.rt'��rj�i r r IE�Ir'�t! 48" AT 24" 72" AT 36" BOX ,AT SHRUBS. PLANT PIT DETAIL AT 30 " BOX irk 1" = 1' -0" 32 9343.19 -03 AERIAL GUY CABLES TO CONNECT TRUNKS: 9 GA CABLE W/ CLEAR PLASTIC COATING THRU 5/8" DIA. RUBBER HOSE TIE, ilk•• 11 SEE PLANT PIT D ETAI L. 00 -- FINISHED GRADE. (n LO III - III -III ;_III W a X 0 u7 m- AVOID PLACING STAKES Q THRU ROOTBALL. SET ROOTBALL CROWN 1 1/2" HIGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING FINISHED GRADE. SLOPE BACKFILL AWAY FROM ROOTBALL FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE. "CINCH- TIE ", "GRO- STRAIT ", TURF AREAS. OR EQUAL FLEXIBLE RUBBER w 0 KEEP TURF CLEAR FOR TREE TIES IN FIGURE EIGHT '- Uj KEEP MULCH 6" - 8" FASHION. ATTACH TO STAKE Q ,III I W/ TWO GALV. ROOFING NAILS. x 0 0 LAYER OF SHREDDED BARK. M .- ROOTBALL 2" LODGEPOLE PINE TREATED c ¢ - TREE STAKES. SET STAKES AREA TO DEPTH. ItECESS TURF AREA APPROXIMATELY 120 DEGREES 6" HIGH WATER APART. co r- 00 -- FINISHED GRADE. (n LO III - III -III ;_III W a X 0 u7 m- AVOID PLACING STAKES Q THRU ROOTBALL. SET ROOTBALL CROWN 1 1/2" HIGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING FINISHED GRADE. SLOPE BACKFILL AWAY FROM ROOTBALL FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE. xx x- - _ -- + ' 0724 €i TURF AREAS. - 111 AREAS. KEEP TURF CLEAR FOR KEEP MULCH 6" - 8" CIRCLE y.• t RADIUS ,III I FROM BASE OF TREE. TREE, MULCH WITH A 3 THICK LAYER OF SHREDDED BARK. ROOTBALL MULCH WATER WELL ¢ - AREA TO DEPTH. ItECESS TURF AREA 6" HIGH WATER 1 TO ALLOW FOR MULCH. .. i� PLANT TABLETS AS AREAS. FINISHED GRADE NOTED OR SPEICIFIED. BACKFILL MIX, SEE I AT ' NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS. j�OY.��s•YS� AT 15 GALLON FINISHED GRADE SOIL MIX ,.rt'��rj�i r r IE�Ir'�t! 48" AT 24" BOX FIRMLY ,AT SHRUBS. xx x- - _ -- + ' 0724 €i - 111 =111_1 I ,- =' <m° m II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,III ,III I J LO N 0� ROOTBALL ¢ - M t- r- - QQd <t ; .. °a - PLANT TABLETS AS N N N n NOTED OR SPEICIFIED. BACKFILL MIX, SEE I 2X ROOTBALL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS. 32" AT 15 GALLON NATIVE SOIL MIX 48" AT 24" BOX FIRMLY COMPACTED. 60" AT 30 " BOX 72" AT 36" BOX PLANT PIT DETAIL 1" = 1' -0„ 32 9343.23 -03 1" X 4" Horizontal Wood Members or 6' - 8' Approved Substitute Vertical Barriers Placed at Protective Radius HABITAT r r AND LANDSCAPING PERMITS: 1. A HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND LANDSCAPING PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT. APPLICATION SHOULD NOT BE MADE UNTIL FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL HAS BEEN GRANTED. a. AN APPLICATION AND AN EXTRA COPY OF THE APPROVED FINAL APPLICATION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THIS DEPARTMENT IN ORDER TO PROCESS THE PERMIT. b. ALL EXOTIC SPECIES, I.E., BRAZILIAN PEPPER (SCHINUS TEREBIN- THIFOLIUS), PUNK TREES (MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA), AND CHINESE TALLOW (SAPIUM SEBIFERUM) MUST BE REMOVED AS A CONDITION OF SITE DEVELOPMENT. WHERE NECESSARY DUE TO THEIR PROXIMITY TO PROTECTED PLANT MATERIAL, HAND REMOVAL WILL BE REQUIRED. SHOULD THIS REMOVAL BE TO A DEGREE THAT A POTENTIAL FOR EROSION IS CREATED, THE AREA MUST BE RESTABILIZED WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL. c. ONCE FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL (FAA) HAS BEEN GRANTED, A BARRICADE INSPECTION CAN BE SCHEDULED. WHEN THE BARRICADES HAVE BEEN APPROVED THE PERMIT CAN BE TYPED AND RELEASED. TREE PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION: TREE BARRICADES AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE REQUIREMENTS: 1. TREE BARRICADES AND /OR SILT SCREENS OR HAYBALES SHALL BE REQUIRED ALONG THE EDGES OF VEGETATED AREAS TO BE PROTECTED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF HABITAT MANAGEMENT AND LANDSCAPE PERMITS. THE LOCATION FOR EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. 2. ALL DESIRABLE TREES MUST BE RETAINED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. IT WILL BE REQUIRED THAT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (i.e. BUILDINGS, WALKWAYS, DRIVEWAYS, POND BANKS, DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, ETC.) BE ADJUSTED TO RETAIN DESIRABLE TREES. GRADE CHANGES MUST BE SENSITIVE TO TREES REMAINING. IN GENERAL, NO GRADE CHANGES SHOULD OCCUR WITHIN THE CANOPY DRIP LINE OF PINE TREES AND 2/3 THE CANOPY DRIP LINE OF HARDWOOD TREES TO BE SAVED. LANDSCAPING 1. EACH LANDSCAPING AND REPLANT TREE MUST BE PLANTED WITHIN A MINIMUM FIVE (5) FOOT BY TEN (10) FOOT OPEN SPACE PLANTER WITH SUITABLE GROUND COVER. LANDSCAPE TREES MUST BE PLANTED IN SAME VICINITY AS VEHICULAR USE AREAS IN ORDER TO BREAK THE MONOTONY OF UNBROKEN EXPANSES OF PAVING. TREES MUST NOT BE PLANTED WITHIN MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS. 2. THE USE OF XERISCAPE DESIGN MUST BE UTILIZED FOR THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE DESIGN. THE DESIGN DEMONSTRATES THE USE OF A LOW VOLUME IRRIGATION SYSTEM, ORGANIC MULCHES, DROUGHT AND COLD TOLERANT PLANT MATERIAL, ZONING OF PLANT MATERIAL BY WATER REQUIREMENTS, SOIL AMENDMENTS (IF NECESSARY) AND THE PRACTICAL USE OF TURF. 3. NEW LANDSCAPING MUST BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR MOVE- MENT BY WHEEL STOPS, OR CURBING. WHERE POSSIBLE, THE AREA BETWEEN THE BARRIER AND LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SHOULD REMAIN AS GREENSPACE. 4. LARGE TREE SPECIES PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET AWAY FROM BUILDINGS, SIGNS, FENCES, LIGHT POLES, UTILITY LINES AND ANY OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS THAT MAY IMPAIR NATURAL GROWTH. 5. TREES PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION MUST NOT BE IN CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED OR EXISTING UTILITY LINES OR STRUCTURES, EASE- MENTS OR OTHER AREAS WHICH MAY REQUIRE EXCAVATION IN THE EVENT OF SYSTEM FAILURE. THESE FEATURES SUCH AS THE WATER LINES MUST REMAIN OUTSIDE THE 5' X 10' PLANTER AREA. 6. SOILS WITHIN PLANTER BEDS MUST BE SUITABLE FOR PROPOSED PLANTED MATERIAL WITH REGARDS TO pH, SOIL TEXTURE, SOIL STRUCTURE, AND SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE. 7. ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL MUST BE FLORIDA GRADE #1 OR BETTER. 8. ALL REQUIRED TREES MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 10" HIGH, 2 1/2" CALIPER AT TIME OF PLANTING. 9. ALL HEDGES MUST BE 24" HIGH AT THE TIME OF PLANTING, PLANTED AT 36 " ON CENTER, AND BE MAINTAINED AT A MINIMUM OF 3' IN HEIGHT. 10. WHERE LANDSCAPE OR REPLANT TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE PLANTED IN THE PERIMETER BUFFER, THE BUFFER MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE. IRRIGATION NOTES 1. SHALLOW WELLS, OPEN SURFACE WATER BODIES, OR RECLAIMED WATER MUST BE USED AS A SOURCE OF IRRIGATION WATER. THE DIST- RIBUTION SYSTEM FOR IRRIGATION MUST NOT BE CONNECTED TO COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL WATER SOURCES, UNLESS IT CAN BE DEMON- STRATED THAT THESE SOURCES ARE NOT AVAILABLE. 2. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST UTILIZE LOW VOLUME DESIGNS SUCH AS LOW TRAJECTORY HEADS OR SOAKER HOSES TO PROVIDE DIRECT AP- PLICATION AND LOW EVAPORATION. SYSTEMS THAT OVERSPRAY AREAS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE IRRIGATION, SUCH AS PAVED AREAS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE, HIGH IRRIGATION NEED AREAS MUST NOT OVERSPRAY LOW NEED AREAS. 3. HIGH WATER DEMAND LANDSCAPE AREAS SUCH AS TURF MUST BE SERVED BY A SEPARATE IRRIGATION ZONE THAN LOW WATER NEED PLANTER BEDS, OR MULCHED AREAS WITH TREES. IN NO CASE, SHALL ANY PLANTED VEGETATION AREA BE MORE THAN 50' FROM A WATER SUPPLY HOSE BBB. i 4. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST BE OPERATED BY AN IRRI- GATION SYSTEMS OPERATED BY AN IRRIGATION CONTROLLER CAPABLE OF DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN THE SCHEDULES OF HIGH AND LOW WATER DEMAND AREAS. CONTROLLERS MUST HAVE MULTIPLE CYCLE START CAPACITY AND A FLEXIBLE CALENDAR PROGRAM ABLE TO BE SET TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL OR WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT IMPOSED RESTRICTIONS. 5. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH RAIN SENSOR DEVICE OR SWITCH WHICH WILL OVERRIDE THE IRRIGATION CYCLE OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WHEN ADEQUATE RAINFALL HAS OCCURRED. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN UNDERGROUND IRRI- GATION SYSTEM TO COVER 100% OF ALL ON SITE PLANTING AREA. THIS SYSTEM SHALL CONTAIN BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. UNDERGROUND PIPING, SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR BETTER. 2. SEVEN (7) DAY PROGRAMMABLE TIME CLOCK TO ACTIVATE ZONES. 3. SPRINKLER HEADS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TYPE OF PLANTING. 4. ELECTRIC VALVES. 5. GAUGE 14 OF COPPER WIRE. 6. FIBERGLASS OR PLASTIC ZONE VALVE BOXES. WHERE PIPING IS UNDER DRIVEWAY AND CONCRETE WALKS, THE PIPES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SCHEDULE 40 SLEEVES 18" BELOW GRADE. MATERIALS SUPPLIED SHALL BE EQUAL TO THOSE MANUFACTURED BY RAIN BIRD CO. OR APPROVED EQUAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SYSTEM LAY -OUT ALONG WITH CATALOG SHEETS OF ALL COMPONENTS IN THE SYSTEM TO THE OWNER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THE ENTIRE SYSTEM SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER. ANY AND ALL USE OF HOSE BIBBS IN ASSOCIATION WITH NON- POTABLE WATER SUPPLIES SHALL BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH SBCCI STANDARD PLUMBING CODE, CHAPTER VI CRITERIA REFERENCE COLOR CODING OF ABOVE GRADE RISER PIPING AND LABEL /TAGGING OF OUTLETS AS NON - POTABLE WATER SUPPLY. ANY BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED IS SUBJECT TO NOTIFICATION TO THE AIR TOXICS SECTION OF THE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS. XERISCAPING 1. ORGANIC MULCHES AND /OR DROUGHT TOLERANT GROUNDCOVERS WITHIN PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTER BEDS. 2. DROUGHT AND COLD TOLERANT PLANT MATERIAL. 3, GROUPING OR ZONING PLANT MATERIAL BASE ON SIMILAR WATER REQUIREMENTS AND THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION WATERING SYSTEMS. 4. THE USE OF SOIL TESTING TO IDENTIFY SOIL CONDITIONS NECES- SARY FOR THE CONTINUED SURVIVAL OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. 5. ORGANIC SOIL AMENDMENTS (SUCH AS TOP SOILS, MANURE'S, PEAT AND COMPOSTED MATERIALS) MIXED EXISTING SOILS WITHIN LANDS- CAPING PLANTER BEDS TO DEPTHS CONSISTENT WITH THE ROOT DEPTH OF PROPOSED PLANTED MATERIAL (USE ONLY IF EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS WARRANT THESE AMENDMENTS). 6. THE PRESERVATION AND INCORPORATION OF EXISTING PLANT COMMUNITIES ON SITE INTO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. 7. THE MINIMAL USE OF TURF GRASSES WHICH REQUIRE FREQUENT IRRIGATION. 8. LOW - MAINTENANCE DESIGN. TREE & SHRUB PLANTING DETAILS 1. THE ROOT MASS FORM OF EACH TREE PROPOSED FOR INSTALLATION SHALL BE BALLED OR BURLAPPED, BARE ROOT TREES ARE NOT AC- CEPTABLE. ALL NONBIODEGRADABLE WRAPPINGS WILL BE REMOVED AND BURLAP WILL BE FOLDED DOWN TO ENHANCE WATER ABSORPTION, IF WIRE BASKETS ARE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREES. THE FIRST FEW ROWS OF EACH BASKET WILL BE REMOVED AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION. 2. SUPPORTING APPARATUS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER 1 COMPLETE GROWING SEASON, ALSO THE FLEXIBLE ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE USED WHERE SUPPORT WIRES ARE WRAPPED AROUND TREE TRUNKS /STEMS TO PREVENT CAMBIAL DAMAGE. 3. PLANTING HOLES ASSOCIATED WITH PROPOSED TREES MUST SLOPE (NOT COMPACTED) AND A MINIMUM OF 18 -24 INCHES WIDER THAN THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED SUCH THAT THE TOP OF THE ROOT MASS IS LEVEL WITH THE SURFACE OF THE PLANTING HOLE. TREES SHOULD BE INSTALLED 3 - 5 INCHES ABOVE GRADE ON SITES CONTAINING CLAY. A 2 - 3 INCH LAYER OF ORGANIC MULCH MUST ALSO BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE SURFACE OF EACH PLANTING HOLE. TO PREVENT FUNGAL INFECTION MULCH SHOULD BE PULLED BACK A FEW INCHES FROM THE BASE OF EACH TREE. 4. IF ON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS ARE SUCH THAT SOIL AMENDMENTS WILL BE NECESSARY, THE PLANTING MUST INCLUDE SOIL MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SECTION OF EACH PLANTER AREA TO A DEPTH CONSISTENT WITH THE ROOT DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL. 5. PLANTERS ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREAS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED SUCH THAT LIMEROCK, ASPHALT, CONCRETE OR ANY OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS DO NOT EXTEND UNDER THE SURFACE INTO THE PLANTING AREAS. 6. THE PRACTICE OF TREE TRUNK WRAPPING AND THE APPLICATION OF PAINTS /TAR ONTO PRUNED TREE BRANCHES IS NOT RECOMMENDED BY THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURAL. 7. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE USE OF FERTILIZERS DURING PLANT INSTALLATION IS NOT APPROVED, SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE INDICATES THAT FERTILIZATION (SPECIFICALLY, THE APPLICATION OF NITROGEN) OF TREES /SHRUBS WITHIN THE FIRST GROWING SEASON INHIBITS ROOT GROWTH, THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER STRIP MUST BE CONSTRUCTED SUITABLE FOR PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION. NES Comm.: 0724 €i Checked By. W.F.H. J W • r W � Z, JI .1 ; .. i .1 r •# TYPE OF SURVEY: BOUNDARY SURVEY MAP OF SURVEY: THE MAP AND REPORT ARE NOT FULL AND COMPLETE WITHOUT THE OTHER. SEE SHEET I OF 1 FOR THE MAP OF SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 30B, 31 A & 31 B, LESS STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY, BLOCK R, HIBISCUS GARDENS, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGE 59 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ACCURACY: 1, THE ACCURACY STANDARD USED FOR THIS SURVEY, AS CLASSIFIED IN THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS (61 G 17 -6 FAC), IS "COMMERCIAL /HIGH RISK ". THE MINIMUM RELATIVE DISTANCE ACCURACY FOR THIS TYPE OF SURVEY IS I FOOT IN 10,000 FEET. THE ACCURACY OBTAINED BY MEASUREMENT AND CALCULATION OF A CLOSED GEOMETRIC WAS I FOOT IN 278,501 FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THIS REQUIREMENT. 2. METHODS FOR ALL CONTROL MEASUREMENTS WERE MADE WITH A TRANSIT AND STEEL TAPE, OR DEVICES WITH EQUIVALENT OR HIGHER DEGREES OF ACCURACY. 3. ALL MEASUREMENTS, DISTANCES, ELEVATIONS AND FEATURES WERE PERFORMED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 61 G 17 -6.004 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. DATA SOURCES: 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF MISSOURI AVENUE, A 100 -FOOT RIGHT -OF -WAY, BEING N.00° 14'4 1 ° E. AS PER FDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY MAP 15570 -2604 SHEET 2, WAS UTILIZED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. 2. THE PLAT OF HIBISCUS GARDENS, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGE 59 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, WAS UTILIZED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. 3. THAT CERTAIN TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF CONDOM -MEEK PROPERTY BY COMPASS POINT SURVEYORS, LLC, TELEPHONE NO. (727) 230 -9606, PROJECT NO.06055 -A 1, DATED 10/ 16/06 WAS UTILIZED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. LIMITATIONS: 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE BOUNDARY LINE DETERMINATION OF LOTS 30B, 3 1 A & 31 B BASED ON THE RECORD PLAT INFORMATION, EXISTING OCCUPATION /BOUNDARY MONUMENTATION ALONG WITH FDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY MAP INFORMATION. 2. USE OF THIS SURVEY BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE PREPARED FOR/ CERTIFIED TO, WILL BE THE RE -USERS SOLE RISK WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYOR. 3. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS AFFECTING THIS PROPERTY IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY. 4. NO EXCAVATIONS OR SUBSURFACE WORK EFFORTS OF ANY KIND WERE PERFORMED BY THE SURVEYOR TO VERIFY THE EXISTENCE OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND/ OR THEIR APPURTENANCES. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND/ OR THEIR APPURTENANCES SHOWN, COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. 5. PRINTED DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SUPERSEDE SCALED DIMENSIONS, THERE MAY BE ITEMS DRAWN OUT OF SCALE TO GRAPHICALLY SHOW THEIR LOCATION. 6. UNDERGROUND FOUNDATIONS AND THEIR LOCATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN DETERMINED. 7. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT AND / OR THEIR APPURTENANCES HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN HEREON. 8. SHOWN ANYWHERE ON THIS SURVEY, THE WORD "CERTIFY" IS UNDERSTOOD TO BEAN EXPRESSION OF A PROFESSIONAL OPINION BASED UPON THE SURVEYOR'S BEST KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, AND THAT IT CONSTITUTES NEITHER A GUARANTEE NOR A WARRANTY. 9. SUBJECT PROPERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN FLOOD ZONE °X ", ACCORDING TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 108 OF 327, MAP NUMBER 12103CO 108H, MAP REVISED MAY 17, 2005. AN ACCURATE ZONE DETERMINATION SHOULD BE MADE BY THE PREPARER OF SAID MAP, THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, OR THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION OVER SUCH MATTERS PRIOR TO ANY JUDGMENTS BEING MADE FROM THE ZONE AS NOTED. BOUNDARY INCONSISTENCIES: 1. ANY ANGULAR AND / OR DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION(S) AND THE FIELD LOCATED OCCUPATION BOUNDARY CORNERS, AND BOUNDARY CORNERS WITH MULTIPLE BOUNDARY MONUMENTS ALONG WITH THEIR CORRESPONDING QUADRANT DIRECTIONAL MISSES, ARE SHOWN ON MAP OF SURVEY. APPARENT PHYSICAL USE: THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS VACANT. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY. 1. THE RIGHT -OF -WAY INFORMATION FOR MISSOURI AVENUE AND ROGERS STREET IS FROM THE PLAT OF HIBISCUS GARDENS, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGE 59 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND FDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY MAP 15570 -2604, SHEET 2 WAS UTILIZED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED TO: CONDON -MEEK 1 1 12 COURT STREEET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 SURVEYOR AND MAPPER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: TERRY D. FERGUSON PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER LICENSE NUMBER LS 4535 STATE OF FLORIDA W z W >-I- >:-�Lu <0> E_� 7 C iZ C) C��<C V1 a TITLE: BOUNDARY SURVEY CONDON-MEEK PROPERTY, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDII Ifl►�J:G1��:�: \�1 ►71IZm1l THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 4/27/07 TERRY D. FERGUSON, P.S.M. FLORIDA SURVEYORS REGISTRATION NO. 4535 ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY REPORTS OR MAPS BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED 0 & ��. LOCAT10i"'NMAP N.T.S. LEGEND PG, PAGE PB PLAT BOOK P PLAT C CALCULATED M MEASURED SN &D SET NAIL AND DISK LB 7535 FIR FOUND IRON ROD TBM EL TEMPORARY BENCHMARK ELEVATION A/C AIR CONDITIONING UNIT CONC. CONCRETE CBS CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE FN &D FOUND NAIL & DISC CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE SIRRC SET IRON ROD AND RED CAP LB 7535 SXC SET X CUT OHPL OVERHEAD POWER LINE CT CURB TIE POWER POLE SIGN wv WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT GUYANCHOR TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHOWING IMPROVEMENTS FOR CONDON —MEEK PROPERTY SURVEYOR'S REPORT: MAP OF SURVEY: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 8 -20, 30B, 31A & 31B OF "HIBISCUS GARDENS" PB 14, PG, 59, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. j f o T 1. METHODS FOR ALL CONTROL MEASUREMENTS WERE MADE WITH A TRANSIT AND STEEL TAPE, OR DEVICES WITH EQUIVALENT OR HIGHER DEGREES OF ACCURACY. 2. ALL MEASUREMENTS, DISTANCES, ELEVATIONS AND FEATURES WERE PERFORMED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 61G17 -6.004 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. DATA SOURCES: 1. HORIZONTAL CONTROL IS BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 8 -21, OF SAID HIBISCUS GARDENS PB 14, PG 59. 2. ELEVATIONS ARE BASED UPON (NAVD 88). CONTROL BENCHMARK USED IS TOP OF CITY OF CLEARWATER DISK, ELEVATION = 35.86 FEET (E -07), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COURT STREET & MISSOURI AVENUE. LIMITATIONS: 1, PURPOSE OF SURVEY: A SURVEY OF SELECTED NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL FEATURES OF A PART OF THE EARTHS SURFACE TO DETERMINE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SPATIAL RELATIONS. 3. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY OR RIGHT -OF -WAY SURVEY, 4. USE OF THIS SURVEY BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE PREPARED FOR / CERTIFIED TO, WILL BE THE RE -USERS SOLE RISK WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYOR. 5. PRINTED DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SUPERSEDE SCALED DIMENSIONS. THERE MAY BE ITEMS DRAWN OUT OF SCALE TO GRAPHICALLY SHOW THEIR LOCATION. 6, UNDERGROUND FOUNDATIONS AND THEIR LOCATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN DETERMINED. 7. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT AND / OR THEIR APPURTENANCES HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN HEREON. 8. SHOWN ANYWHERE ON THIS SURVEY, THE WORD "CERTIFY" IS UNDERSTOOD TO BE AN EXPRESSION OF A PROFESSIONAL OPINION BASED UPON THE SURVEYOR'S BEST KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, AND THAT IT CONSTITUTES NEITHER A GUARANTEE NOR A WARRANTY. • FIELD i + =i r it BOUNDARY INCONSISTENCIES: NOT APPLICABLE APPARENT PHYSICAL USE: THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A COMMERCIAL SITE. EASEMENTS /RIGHT -OF -WAY: NOT APPLICABLE PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED TO: CONDON -MEEK 1211 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TERRY D. FERGUSON PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER LICENSE NUMBER LS 4535 STATE OF FLORIDA man TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONDON -MEEK PROPERTY OD OGDxA :D C Sl\�Rv Y LOTS 8-20 3013 3`1A & 31B „HIBISCUS GARDENS" PB 14, i ='& 59 PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA MATCH LINE (SEE SHEET 2) SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. . \Signatures \TDF signature.jpg 10/20!/06 TERRY D. FERGUSON, P.S.M. FLORIDA SURVEYORS REGISTRATION NO. 4535 NO. SHEET INDEX 1 SURVEYORS REPORT, MAP OF SURVEY SPK SET PK NAIL FIR FOUND IRON ROD TBM EL TEMPORARY BENCHMARK ELEVATION A/C m` a ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY REPORTS OR MAPS BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED A w w c=n W W U W z_ J <L i 10, i IF�A F .. L�_' C' I T NO. REVISION DATE BY SPK SET PK NAIL FIR FOUND IRON ROD TBM EL TEMPORARY BENCHMARK ELEVATION A/C m` a 37, CONCRETE CBS CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE FN &D FOUND NAIL & DISC C' I T NO. REVISION DATE BY SPK SET PK NAIL FIR FOUND IRON ROD TBM EL TEMPORARY BENCHMARK ELEVATION A/C AIR CONDITIONING UNIT CONC, CONCRETE CBS CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE FN &D FOUND NAIL & DISC CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE LOCATION MAP N.T.S. PG. PAGE PB PLAT BOOK SPK SET PK NAIL FIR FOUND IRON ROD TBM EL TEMPORARY BENCHMARK ELEVATION A/C AIR CONDITIONING UNIT CONC, CONCRETE CBS CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE FN &D FOUND NAIL & DISC CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE 1�p CPS PN: 06005 CHECKED BY: TDF x SPOT ELEVATION -G-- POWER POLE — Q— SIGN wv WATER VALVE 50 S. BELCHER ROAD, SUITE 114, CLEARWATER, FL 33765 — PH. 727.230.9606 FAX 72 FIRE HYDRANT T GUY ANCHOR WATER METER Fw--ml PROJECT MGR: BR CPS PN: 06005 CHECKED BY: TDF DRAWN BY: BR FB 004, PG 1 -6 — trom on ine ogo.com (linal design)\Composs.j-pq SCALE: AS NOT FIELD DATE: 10/16 T 06 FILE: 06005w.dw 50 S. BELCHER ROAD, SUITE 114, CLEARWATER, FL 33765 — PH. 727.230.9606 FAX 72 I SHEET I .2 09234 —_ —LB N:).: 7535 CD ra co 0 r�- 0 0 m ry LL O r-- L- d m O Lt_d ctf nL 0 m L�--n -yy \1 0 10 i a as 0_ ID c 0 c u L+ l 0 0 1/ 1 0 0 u Q) O _s CL i G O k-- u O L� Q.. TYPE OF SURVEY: BOUNDARY SURVEY MAP OF SURVEY: THE MAP AND REPORT ARE NOT FULL AND COMPLETE WITHOUT THE OTHER. SEE SHEET I OF 1 FOR THE MAP OF SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 29, BLOCK R, HIBISCUS GARDENS, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGE 59 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ACCURACY: I . THE ACCURACY STANDARD USED FOR THIS SURVEY, AS CLASSIFIED IN THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS (61 G 17 -6 FAC), IS "COMMERCIAL /HIGH RISK '. THE MINIMUM RELATIVE DISTANCE ACCURACY FOR THIS TYPE OF SURVEY IS 1 FOOT IN 10,000 FEET. THE ACCURACY OBTAINED BY MEASUREMENT AND CALCULATION OF A CLOSED GEOMETRIC WAS 1 FOOT IN 278,501 FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THIS REQUIREMENT, 2. METHODS FOR ALL CONTROL MEASUREMENTS WERE MADE WITH A TRANSIT AND STEEL TAPE, OR DEVICES WITH EQUIVALENT OR HIGHER DEGREES OF ACCURACY. 3. ALL MEASUREMENTS, DISTANCES, ELEVATIONS AND FEATURES WERE PERFORMED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 61 G 17 -6.004 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. DATA SOURCES: I . BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF MISSOURI AVENUE, A 100 -FOOT RIGHT -OF -WAY, BEING N.00° 14'41 ° E. AS PER FDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY MAP 15570 -2604 SHEET 2, WAS UTILIZED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. 2. THE PLAT OF HIBISCUS GARDENS, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGE 59 OF THE :PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, WAS UTILIZED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. 3. THAT CERTAIN TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF CONDOM -MEEK PROPERTY BY COMPASS POINT SURVEYORS, LLC, TELEPHONE NO. (727) 230 -9606, PROJECT NO.06055 -A 1, DATED 10/ 16/06 WAS UTILIZED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY, 4. THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY SURVEY OF CONDOM -MEEK PROPERTY BY COMPASS POINT SURVEYORS, LLC TELEPHONE NO. (727) 230 -9606, PROJECT NO.06005 -A 1, DATED 04127107 WAS UTILIZED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. LIMITATIONS: 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE BOUNDARY LINE DETERMINATION OF LOTS 30B, 31 A & 31 B BASED ON THE RECORD PLAT INFORMATION, EXISTING OCCUPATION /BOUNDARY MONUMENTATION ALONG WITH FDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY MAP INFORMATION. 2. USE OF THIS SURVEY BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE PREPARED FOR/ CERTIFIED TO, WILL BE THE RE -USERS SOLE RISK WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYOR. 1 THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT, THERE MAYBE ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS AFFECTING THIS PROPERTY IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY. 4. NO EXCAVATIONS OR SUBSURFACE WORK EFFORTS OF ANY KIND WERE PERFORMED BY THE SURVEYOR TO VERIFY THE EXISTENCE OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND / OR THEIR APPURTENANCES. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND / OR THEIR APPURTENANCES SHOWN, COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. 5. PRINTED DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SUPERSEDE SCALED DIMENSIONS. THERE MAY BE ITEMS DRAWN OUT OF SCALE TO GRAPHICALLY SHOW THEIR LOCATION. 6. UNDERGROUND FOUNDATIONS AND THEIR LOCATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN DETERMINED. 7. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT AND/ OR THEIR APPURTENANCES HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN HEREON. 8. SHOWN ANYWHERE ON THIS SURVEY, THE WORD "CERTIFY" IS UNDERSTOOD TO BE AN EXPRESSION OF A PROFESSIONAL OPINION BASED UPON THE SURVEYOR'S BEST KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, AND THAT IT CONSTITUTES NEITHER A GUARANTEE NOR A WARRANTY, 9. SUBJECT PROPERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN FLOOD ZONE °X ', ACCORDING TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 108 OF 327, MAP NUMBER 12103CO 108H, MAP REVISED MAY 17, 2005. AN ACCURATE ZONE DETERMINATION SHOULD BE MADE BY THE PREPARER OF SAID MAP, THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, OR THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION OVER SUCH MATTERS PRIOR TO ANY JUDGMENTS BEING MADE FROM THE ZONE AS NOTED. 10. FIELD DATE: AUGUST 23rd, 2007, BOUNDARY INCONSISTENCIES: 1. ANY ANGULAR AND / OR DIMENSIONAL DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION(S) AND THE FIELD LOCATED OCCUPATION BOUNDARY CORNERS, AND BOUNDARY CORKERS WITH MULTIPLE BOUNDARY MONUMENTS ALONG WITH THEIR CORRESPONDING QUADRANT DIRECTIONAL MISSES, ARE SHOWN ON MAP OF SURVEY. APPARENT PHYSICAL USE: THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND PARKING AREA. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY: I . THE RIGHT -OF -WRY INFORMATION FOR MISSOURI AVENUE AND ROGERS STREET IS FROM THE PLAT OF HIBISCUS GARDENS, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGE 59 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND FDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY MAP 15570 -2604, SHEET 2 WAS UTILIZED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED TO: CONIDON -MEEK I 1 12 COURT STREEET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 SURVEYOR AND MAPPER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: TERRY D. FERGUSON PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER LICENSE NUMBER LS 4535 STATE OF FLORIDA TITLE: PROPERTY, BOUNDARY SURVEY t FLORIDA SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA I r IBISCUS GARDENS —I 0' wobD FENCE 0.42' – 1.57' BETWEEN BUILDINGS LOT 28 #1208 ROGERS STREET i STORY MASONRY BUILDING — 61 AM ;CONC DRIVEWAY' APRON AlMll VICINITYMAP NOT TO SCALE J 1 i eta FT LAWEAOALE MAW •.mil' Y PEST i rr-rn lr� r r ADDDr \!I A -i'lnn IC 4AIM CVA AD!'-ll C 1'HUjt PLAT BOOK BOUNDARY SURVEY (SEE DATA SOURCES #4) PLAT CALCULATED MEASURED SET NAIL AND DISK LB 7535 FOUND IRON ROD ELECTRICAL AIR CONDITIONING UNIT CONCRETE FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND NAIL & DISC CHAIN LINK FENCE FOUND IRON ROD AND RED CAP LB 7535 FOUND °X" CUT OVERHEAD WIRES CURB TIE BUILDING FENCE CORNER WOOD UTILITY POLE POWER POLE SIGN WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT GUY ANCHOR CONCRETE HATCH ASPHALT HATCH a43ri�. X SET NAIL AND DISK x FOUND NAIL AND DISK MGM GAS METER ® FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT X "X" CUT (SCRIBE) ® WATER METER