The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2004-04029; PLT2004-00004FLD2004-04029; PLT2004-00004 605 POINSETTIA AVE POINSETTIA PLACE Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue ®R I G v I N A L Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 -562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $- _(" -,�-Q) - -forel G CASE #: , DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: _ SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS) RECENED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 10 10- 2(rxr3aa — PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— use additional sheets as necessary A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4- 202.A) DEC 0 8 2M NING DEPA"Z71FTNT r 0? yARWi APPLICANT NAME: L p �,❑ �, I�?e p MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: 7 3 4- - 0 p O Z� CELL NUMBER: /y� ,[I FAX NUMBER: 7.3 - O 0O 6 PROPERTY OWNER(S): F L c ,e A--r w C C �1^�T' S6F S (r (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed — provide original signature(s) on page 6) L AGENT NAME(S): e-- 14 i 7-�1 C MAILING ADDRESS: /6 3 4- cS,4 q8 E-MAIL ADDRESS: e4 2- H G x,17 -� . A!E j- PHONE NUMRFR• ^2 -? - CELL NUMBER: 5-6 0- 0 9 6 9 FAX NUMBER: -73.3 -3 7,6 9 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 60,5- IBC 1 NS' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: L-Cn-.5 Ll 4 t ; _ (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in t e submittal) PARCEL NUMBER is c / fl o / . -- / r-„ / �' PARCEL SIZE: / 1 i 3 75" S F (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) Page 1 of 7 - Rexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater DESCRIPMON OF REQUEST(S): of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) 1� 11 ]RIGINAL SEe aC3erL6W Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number RE-C " -, I` V E D DEC Q 8 204 PLANNUN D P PTA IVT Ci`i y OF CL�AIRWICR Flexible development approval to permit eight (8) attached dwellings (townhouse) with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 11.3 feet (To Column) 19.5 feet (to Building), reduction to the rear setback from 10 -20 feet to 8.52 feet, rear (Northeast Building Corner), and 15.32' rear (Southeast Building Corner). Also Rear Setback to Concrete pads at Garage Pedestrian Exit (Northeast conc stoop)of 6.22 feet and Rear (Southeast conc. stoop) 13.13 feet. An Increase in height from 35 feet to 36.83 feet (roof deck) with and additional 4 feet for Handrail and parapets, and 10.4 feet to the mid -point of the Elevator /Stair Roof (Middle) Enclosure. For a roof median height of 47.25. The top of the roof of the Central covered deck area is 55' -0" This area is deed restricted and shall never vbe enclosed. To permit Parking that is designed to back into the public right -of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2 -803.0 Preliminary Plat Approval for eight (8) Townhome Lots. And transfer of density for (1) unit from 200 Brightwater Drive. Allowing for a Density of 31 units per acre as opposed to 30 Units per Acre. Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Will Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater MIGINAL DOES THIS APPUCAT10N INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES -A– NO _ if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) VROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4202.A) UBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. a/ 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3.913.A) Provide complete responses to the sic (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA – Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. SEE— Al E X T eW 15 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. S CZ, Al &X T PA aC 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. .v4FX7- PA��iL ��► �l� 4. �L�.%Z� LL,U V .LJ The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. E 2A0 4 PLANNING DIEPA.17 I E NT I^`M`l9.r rMeu ,w r fi -A 5. Syr % Nsi vi.,L:PiKOy .IER The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. sAr c: X 7- PS G 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Provide complete responses to the ten 00) CCMPREHENSIVE INALL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) – Explain w each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Page 3 of 7 – Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Inf ill Redevelopment Project– City of Clearwater GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA 1. Within the General area of the Old Florida District, existing single and two story flood prone buildings are evident with higher structures with a three block area. The future renovation of these neighboring buildings will dictate the need for increased heights due to FEMA requirements. The proposed Townhome occupancy are in harmony with the existing apartment and overnight accommodations currently existing. The scale and bulk of the adjacent Chapel By The Sea provides a natural vertical transition to this new building from the 2 story buildings. 2. Park Place will be a positive impetus to the resurgence of character and renovation of the surrounding buildings not only due to the quality and array of Architectural Features, but also due to the Mediterranean Character compatible with the Adjacent Chapel by the Sea. Mediterranean by definition evokes solidity, coolness and permanence. All of which will improve, not impair the surrounding developments. 3. Upon Completion of the townhomes, the positive improvements at the site to include stormwater detention (piping to existing inlet), new Tropical Landscaping and New Sidewalks will enhance the Health, Safety and Welfare of Pedestrians and Vehicles. 4. With Provision for (2) two vehicles to be parked on site, the off street parking will be minimized allowing for a smooth flow of Traffic. 5. The Proposed development emulates the existing and future desirable design of Clearwater Beaches "Beach by Design ". The Choice of Roof tile is similar to the adjacent church in , texture and shape. All in keeping with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The residential Occupancy of the existing building will not produce any adverse effects, including visual or acoustic or olfactory than would normally be produced by family cooking, music and amenities. Fx� DEC 0 8 2004 Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Will Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. S EE nJ rk T 9046 @- 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. /I! E X 7T 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. wEx7- PftG� 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. w �X 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a w hole. .t/ 41 X 9. Adequate off - street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Divieion 14 =of ,,Ar iclg- S%ill,be"!available to avoid on- street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. C C w.� DEC Al E X T- P •4 6 t� PLANNIN ' CITY Q: e design of all buildings COMPHeSWITF] e UUMS1 LAbLIKA U1 LJUWMVWJJ LJ1bL"t;LUWb1V1 g i e es n LJIV isio a PP Use separate sheets as necessary. Page 5 of 7 — Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive infill Redevelopment Proyect— City of Clearwater ORIGIUHL The Attached Dwellings are permit -able within the Tourist Zone. No mixed use is being proposed. The multi - family residential character of the existing neighborhood is being maintained and improved through the introduction of townhomes, with individual property owners, as opposed to apartments or transient residential units. The proposed design will provide a neighborhood "row house" appearance reminiscent of the classical residential urban neighborhood environment across from the McKay Play Field. The purchase of another site is financial unfeasible for this particular developer, as he and his family have owned this parcel since 1984. The transfer of the property to the family (Florence Enterprises) Limited Liability corporation was formed in 2003 solely for the development of this parcel of land. The area immediately adjacent to this parcel will enjoy the prosperity of new development, upscale townhomes, new landscaping, improved storm water drainage, and sidewalks as stated previously. The City of Clearwater as a whole will benefit from the increased property tax base, the infrastructure improvements and the quality construction and design within this neighborhood. The lot width and off street parking are conforming with current codes. The rear setback variance is in an effort to provide more on site storm water detention with proper outfall to avoid over flow onto adjacent properties. The front setback variance is applicable to the undulating fagade, and front entries. The garage doors are setback 20' -0" from the property line. The 4.34 foot front yard variance is in an effort to provide pedestrian scale interest, shade and shadow as opposed to a monolithic fagade. (A more dynamic and active street life). Parking in excess of the code requirement of 1.5 cars per unit (i.e. 2 cars per unit) is being provided on site, will minimize on street parking. Article 3, Division 5, Tourist District requirements are regulated by Beach By Design. The Park Place Townhomes, within the Old Florida District of Beach By Design is well within the Design Guidelines set forth. In particular, the height is within the mid rise parameters (less than 75' per NFPA) and the recommendation of "new.....and townhouses" as the preferred form of development. The Mediterranean architecture, with inviting human scale entries provide an environment in scale with the beach community. The direct proximity to the existing Park, and Church, and truly compatable with single family (towhnhouse) residences as apposed to overnight accommodations or any of the other Toursit facility Uses. The integration of form and function is realized thru the unitization of the rooftops for maximum view and balcony area, as opposed to using ground floor areas. fli�C 0 8 2004 DEPARTMENT CLEARWATER k-fi.:CE1VEU ORIGINAL n FT.oama, DEPARTMENT Although compatible with use, the deviation from the development §tgr dd �Uarding setbacks and height are not outside of the range of the numerical allowance within the flexible design standards for attached dwellings. The existing non conforming building setbacks of 6.4 feet side, 10 feet front, and 5.3 feet rear will be eliminated by the construction of this new project. The reduction in FRONT SETBACK is for the upper story cantilevered balconies and columns to support these balconies. The view to the west (Building Front) over the existing city park is one of tranquility which will remain for many years to come. Due to the narrowness of the subject parcel (60 -70' deep) The Front setback is important to help provide a marketable sq footage (2200 -2300) within this "hyper- inflated" area., The unpaved area within the front ROW beyond the property Line being a substantial (16) helps to alleviate any tunneling effect. Coupled with the open area of the Park, we believe the approval of the front setback and this project will provide for a more dynamic street life , much as the "painted Lady" houses of San Francisco provide to their neighboring park. The side yard setbacks are in conformance with the Standard Requirements within the Tourist Zone and access is available for emergency and maintenance vehicles. However, the rear yard setback(to the building) is an average of 12'. The movement of the building to the rear property line is to facilitate the parking of vehicles within the front drive, provide for the required sight triangle and work within the existing triangulation of the property. The required landscaping will not be reduced due to this request, and adequate on site detention is being provided. There is no pool proposed for this site. The concrete pavement within the rear setback consists of 3'0" deep "stoops" at the rear garage pedestrian access doors. These concrete pads average 9' -8" from the Rear Property Line. OUR INCREASE IN HEIGHT WILL RESSULT IN IMPROVED OFF STREET PARKING BELOW THE BUILDING, AND A DESIGN WHICH WITH THE CONTINUED UTILIZATION ROOF TOP DECKING. The covering of the decking contributes to the Architectural Elevation of the Building, reducing a solid block wall fagade (at the allowable height) as. Such, the 3 Dimensional view of the building from the adjacent park and Intercoastal waterway will be one of Character and Intrigue. A request is also being made for (1) additional residential unit to be transferred from the Brightwater Drive TownHome Project at 200 Brightwater Drive to this property. The precise calculations of Density indicate that 7.8 units may be constructed on this site. In an effort to secure financing and marketing an additional unit is being sought. The (1) unit is in conformance with county standards as they "round -up" or down at the .5 amount for density. We respectfully request your positive consideration of this minimal request The existing Market value of the site and building is approximately $525,000. The new improvements will raise the value to approximately $2,800,000. The subsequent increase in adjacent property values is inevitable. Dalate is within that 7R161NAL r the consultant with Beach by Design and The new landscaping, improved building setbacks with an undulating front and rear facade meet the de '- . eters of Beseh By Design. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL R&— iREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) 0 R ( G I iNI ,� L SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; /""""'1111 B' TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; " LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; O PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (i.e. Reduce number of spaces). PJPrior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator A and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; a' GRADING PLAN, as applicable; 2' PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; uJA F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A) "TE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 361: _ All dimensions;' North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; _✓ Location map; C Q 8 �� Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; ✓/ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; ✓ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; Include floor plates on multi -story buildings; c , € All required setbacks; UK OF C - F,'� All existing and proposed points of access; _ ✓/ All required sight triangles; / Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; _✓ Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; (* Note: Per Section 3.911, all utilities shall be located /relocated underground) ✓ All parking spaces, ggyTe to s, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces; A✓Q Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; W /R. _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3- 201(D) (i) and Index #7011; Location of all landscape material; Lt Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands; JA"' � Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; R Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and -- a .✓ 4-0 6 . Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: 1� Land area in square feet and acres; r/ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _✓ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _L,-- Gross floor area devoted to each use; ✓ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; L- Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and — Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses A/ //.5L- ❑ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: WA One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; j Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stomwrater management for the parcel; Page 7 of 7 - Rexible Development Application - Comprehensive Intitt Redevelopment Project- City at Clearwater jZ All open space areas; ORIGINAL // Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees Igo � M141 DEC 0 8 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 8 of 7 — Rexible Development !Application - Comprehensive Intitt Redevelopment Project— City of Cteam ater G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ✓/ LANDSCAPE PLAN: 7 3 N2/ GINAL All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or labeq indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details fortrees,.palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes @--' REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/: X 11), in color. E C , i V V/A COMPREI€NSNE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable PLANNING DEPARTMENT H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ✓ STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: ✓ , Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations e(/ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFVMAD) PERMIT SLBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable j& COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE -IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as �p rt of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. GY BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS —four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8' /z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) 01A ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. Page 9 of 7 — Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project— City of Clearwater ORIGINAL / LANDSCAPE PLAN: •! All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; ✓ Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline; Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including Instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; ✓ Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions Imposed by the Community Development Board); / Irrigation notes. 14 _/ RE E � I VE ❑ EDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible); 9' IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval): DEC 0 8 1004 ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. A-11 -1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT C+11 Y CAI' 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes -a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or / as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project @� BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) l V14 ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), If submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 801.C) ❑ Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement L. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property ^ described in this application. Page 7 of 7 — Flexible Development Residential Infill Application — City of Clearwater ORIGINAL Signature ofproperty owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEUAS n� Swom to and subscribed before me this o'er✓ day of ---oh-e— A.D. 200± to me and/or by G� /A e -A- P/U, ( (T S , has hrot6ry public, pro uced Ftc t of o &- as My Commission expires: identification. �♦ AA AAAAAA W DEC 0 8 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Page 8 of 7 - Flexible Development Residential Infill Application - City of Clearwater K RAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Sectidh 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) N-,- I I I� I I V/ I L- . Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. .I.. -. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sw r to Ind subscribed before a this a1G' day of wmA.D. 20 to e an by U/ a - , � lF � , who i ersonally known has prod ced as identification. Notary public, My commission expires: Susan S. Littlejohn MYCOMMISSION# DD200435 EXPIRES o�.. May 26, 2007 h` BONDED iHRU TROY FAIN INSURANC�INC DEC 0 8 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 6 of 7 — Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project— City of Clearwater M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: ORIGINAL _ F� -o.e�✓ c t t wTt�e.re� G., ,q Y .✓ E Pig+ . � c. �. P:S (Names of ALL property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I aK /we are he owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): G o S 00 0 -- 10+✓s4 Z:Z2g - -- 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) F t. jr X / ,a W, P �e .4 4 T 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does /do) appoint: pA TT T1 4 oe C TIE-c=,7� 16.3 IL S.4 •✓ or .0 Y O .G 0 y is G .L/ J ,= &- 3 4 6 ye as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1 /we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is t cor perty OV4er CE � Property Owner R Property Owner DEC 0 8 200 Property Owner PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this o26 day of personally appeared WA'/,y4 1q- �h �! /� f s who having been first duly sworn eposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. My Commission Expires: Notary Public Susan S. L'rttlejo n *R : MY COMMISSION # DD200435 EXPIRES May 26, 2001 BONDED THRU TROY FAININSURANCE INC S:lmaMUIg UepatTmenivippucavurn runnawcva—j— c 1 luv-- v ...r. .. .. .. ...,... , r••• ••• r• -� -- -rte Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) F «iX/at - E- vP- ✓t A.oPertwT Co.g 00je&"&- •✓.riot /.✓ - /=/ L. 4- 3. That the undersigned (hasthave) appointed and (does /do) appoint: P.4 T,t t C 1 04 o-Y. S Pty Gl c'N /Q . /. 4. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (Itwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing Is mact. Property ChAner �` rty12� -tom 'L • L - G Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on c� �— day of JzdJt� this y✓ 02 personally appeared [,L& ynio `/J%L[ `// 2g who having been first duty sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the nts of the affidavit that e/she signed. ALICE H KANEG� Notary Public NOTARY COMMISSION # DD244571 ry July Commission Expires: PUBLIC O EXPIRES AUG 25 2007 a�n�i BONDED THROUGH RU INSURANCE COMPANY S: "arming DepartmentlApplication Fomaidevelopment tomw12003 FORMSIresidential iniill application 2003.d- C E R. DEC 0 8 2r. PLANNING D17 CITY OF C . Page 9 of 7 - Flexible Development Residential infill Application - City of Clearwater ORIGINAL MINUTES OF INITIAL MEETING OF MEMBERS OF FLORENCE ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. R F-'-- % L-" L1 +1 f,, E Lam' DEC 0 8 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The first meeting of the Members of FLORENCE ENTERPRISES L.L.C. was held on the 27t" day of December, 2002 at the office of Thomas W. Ruggles, Esquire. There were present the following: Thomas W. Ruggles, the organizer and authorized representative Wayne H. Phillips, and Gay M. Phillips, his wife, being all the Members. The meeting was called to order by Mr. Ruggles; it was moved, seconded and unanimously carried, that Mr. Phillips act as Temporary Chairman, and that Mrs. Phillips act as Temporary Secretary. Mr. Ruggles announced that he had assigned all subscription and rights to membership units in the Company to Mr. and Mrs. Phillips and thereupon tendered his resignation as Managing Member. Copies of the Assignment and the Resignation as accepted by Mr. and Mrs. Phillips are attached to these Minutes. The meeting then proceeded to the election of a successor Managing Member "Manager ". Upon nominations duly made and seconded, the following were elected and qualified: Managing Member: Mr. Wayne H. Phillips Secretary: Mrs. Gay M. Phillips Treasurer: Mrs. Gay M. Phillips The Manager of the Company thereupon assumed the Chair, and the Secretary of the Company assumed her duties as Secretary of the meeting. The Secretary presented to the meeting: 1. Copy of the Articles of Organization 2. Copy of the proposed Operating Agreement of the Company. upon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously carried, it was Page 1 of 3 ORIGINAL RESOLVED, that the Articles of Organization and the Operating Agreement be, and they hereby are, approved; ratified and adopted by the Members. The Secretary submitted to the meeting a seal proposed for use as the Company seal.. Upon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously carried, it was RESOLVED, that the form of seal submitted to this meeting be, and it hereby is, approved and adopted as and for the Company seal of this Limited Liability Company, and that an impression thereof be made on the margin of these Minutes. There was presented to the meeting a specimen of a proposed certificate to represent the ownership of an interest in the company. Upon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously carried, it was RESOLVED, that the specimen form of certificate which has been presented at this meeting be, and the same hereby is, approved and adopted as the certificate to represent the ownership of an interest in the Company; and it was further RESOLVED, that the specimen certificate so presented to the meeting be annexed to the Minutes thereof. There was presented to the meeting a proposal to issue units of ownership in the Company. A discussion followed and it was determined that all authorized membership units would be issued to Mr. and Mrs. Phillips with expressed rights of survivorship. The banking arrangements of the Company were then discussed. After discussion, on motion duly made, seconded and carried, that the Bank shall be as selected by the Treasurer and it shall be provided with an appropriate Secretarial Certificate to be furnished by the Secretary of the Company A conformed copy of such Secretarial Certificate will thereupon be annexed to the Minutes of the meeting. The acquisition by the Company of selected properties heretofore owned by the Phillips' was then discussed and after discussion it was determined that that the Manager is and will be fully empowered without further action of the members to select and acquire'rental and /or investment properties located within the State of Florida or the State of North Carolina from the Phillips or third parties upon such terms and conditions as he determines and to take title in the Company. Upon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously carried, it was RESOLVED, that upon receipt of consideration therefor, certificates representing ownership in the Company be issued by the Secretary as follows: L.I , Ec-H �� Page 2 of 3 DEC 0 8 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL Name and. Address Interest in the Company Wayne H. Phillips and Gay M. Phillips, 100% his wife, with expressed rights of survivorship 100 Membership Units and it was fu; <her RESOLVED, that the Managing Member of the Company be, and he is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to take any and all steps, and to execute and deliver any and all instruments in connection with carrying the foregoing resolutions into effect. There being no further business to come before the meeting, upon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously carried, the same was adjourned. Attest: 1 CA C tSer.•nxWPJccurnenls`.Cslate Planning`.PiiiU,1PS�.Flnrence initislMee :ing Min wpd #1175$_03 Q) ---IF DEC 0 8 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 3 of 3 [LJ 1 0 ZU04 114- 1- ,i'`Ni'NG DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ASSIGNMENT OF SUBSCRIPTION AND RIGHTS TO MEMBERSHIP UNITS The undersigned, Organizer, Initial Manager and Authorized Representative of FLORENCE ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company, formed on December 18, 2002 and assigned Florida. Department of State Docurn.ent Number L02000034130, hereby assigns and sets over all of his rights, title and interest in and to subscription rights and membership units in and for said entity to 'W AYNE H. PHILLIPS and GAY M. PHILLIPS, his wife, of 256 President Street, Dunedin, Florida 34598. Dated this 27" day of December, 2002 at Belleair, Pinellas County, Florida. C \Sentr-w'PAoccmews %Fsatc Planning \MILLiPSMorence AssignSub.wpd N 11745.03 THOMAS W. RUGGLES R E C -. E� � VE--- L)) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER . Storm M.H. >.668 'b POINSETTIA AVENUE 60' R/W SITE BENCH O� �• �• -_4T— _ —ST— ST PPKK NAIL It- —sue - - �i — PAVEMENT 20' . 8" Storm Se ^�' EL = 3.61 NAVD >x. Location) ASPHALT PAVEMENT 12 • nlb .�• .9a7�• ,�• ' Overh a i es:' U P. a:' ve head Wir ', .. a .. .. • t • Fnd 1/2" 3 .6 4821 .3, .5,.. ,.. .: f'.. N98�OU'..L .'0 • ai PLS 1982 - _.'- / �a , \ •10' t + a' . 3 • •. 22 "PM - -4 °• '�' '2i .4 i _$" i ' 2S=,_ ,y. ,..� a4tP n b ', 4 Ch• M � — , (�' ,p 15.0 a. o cv L. 4.50/619 S. .F. LOT 11 1 a 5E °D. Ln `r O• 2 4 I I '� I hN r v EL. 4.25/347 S. 0 0 O o n AC LOT 12 y X UNIT 1 LOWEST LIVING F.F. ELA 15.831 UNIT 2 LOWEST LIVING F.F. EL. 15.83 UNTT �3 LOWEST LIVING F.F. EL. 15.83 UNITI 4 LOWEST LIMN F.F. ELI 15.8 1�OAESI L F.F. EL. COVe NG i�6.83 d Pates LOWE F. F. IV G16• L.a 15 83� VNIT 7 LOWEST LIVING F.F. EL. 15.83 y UNIT 8 q WEST LIVING OF EL. 15.83 e N 3 'd LC . 3 12��pM(��• 13 "PM 4.0 „o� b p W ° H 1�Y b o ::�� w 2 L�:: 11. ::�� 6.4 OO OO OO � u; 01054PM q3 L 20O W N 2' I I I O O I(1 ul 1 13 4 22.2 a a O 7�M175.37 95.2 -Fnd 1/2 " I P 6.21 TO BALCONY No I D. 12 "OAR 1 'M 75.03 D" DRAINAGE AREA TO STOOP • O I 28 4 BOUNDARY (TYP.) W Fnd 4x4 C11- No 1, D, S03Q44'28 "E / b• ti h b• I i LOT 3 LOT 2 P&AWr rF LO I I 6 10 Mtn .v.-o 13� 175.37'P1 12'OAK ' �„ 175.031M S03442'28 "E S03444'28 "E ... L ARO 25 IX �m 7!i✓1 1 AVENUE am �torm Sewer 12 12 ication LMM �t��_ fl•E.L�f1l�f1 ��..�_l'i,ISL��J �!"'.�f®o''IPOINSETT"A ' ��\ ��.] u��•• •��•••�•�'�R•�'••� > /J�a�l.l: I,,.. F - 11 ■ ■►I■I/i1■ ■ ■1. /I\��1) ! MR ft LOT 11 6 ht. rbs both sMes of © i, © - - drive-lay RE UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNI7 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 UNIT 7 LOWEST LIVING LOWEST LIVING LOWEST LIVING LOWEST LIVING' LOWEST LIVING LOWEST LIVING FIT m 175.37'P1 12'OAK ' �„ 175.031M S03442'28 "E S03444'28 "E ... L ARO 25 IX UNIT 8 LOWEST LIVING F.F. EL. 15.83 1`/ IOTE: \-OAK TREE TO BE PRUNED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST a t SOD � N o, m L 00 ao a m rn Ii �m 7!i✓1 1 �I' �A UNIT 8 LOWEST LIVING F.F. EL. 15.83 1`/ IOTE: \-OAK TREE TO BE PRUNED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST a t SOD � N o, m L 00 ao a m rn Ii PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER -AdIL- 605 Poinsettia Clearwater Beach Florida m� - I , - - - � 7� ., 7"M --jlc�. �rV, jdp , IK,O lit IL DEC 0 8' 2094 PiVING DF-PARTNIENT WWARER �6F. CLEA� ORlulNAL kobi BUCK A�—Lr, AW GARAGE mom, Irml la NMI IMMENS • '0 Rif I G, I N A L 01K 605 Poinsettia Clearwater Beach Florida ECE WE'D Drr_-C 08 2004 PIANNING DIF PARTIPA ENT CITY OF EAST ELEVATION • 0 • Wm-: l (-,1 .I A I • SOUTH ELEVATION I I �� I ORO. -AL RFWR DEC 0 8 2uu,t PLANNING DIETARTMENT mom pk 1�; 7- 7, iw a 'Aim- I w7v t voT re 1 11 Park PCGlCe ORIGINAL DEC 0 8 2004 Park PCace • 1�1 OR I GINAL Product Name: ButtErcup Blend SW CI-1 R Manufacturer: MonierLifetile � SKU: I BACU6243 ROOF TILES TRIM AND FACIA 2310 SEED PEARL 0 1 Er 0 8 2004 ",� PLANN!NGj D ikRTME6.NT CV OF CLEA,`VvVAT!.:R BUILDING EXTERIOR WALLS 1022 PINK HIBISCUS PRATT AND LAMBERT PAINT COLORS A. 0 991�s --o L� . r •ys PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER APPLICANT'S NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ORIGIN L CITY OF CLEARWATER r :r r rJ3 V't :rrVl r •V tT :alr Z swA—• V-f,raY- PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION MT NICTPA T . RE.R ICES RT TH -T)DJ :, 100 COT TTH NNRTT .E 4 V ENT TF_., 2" FLOOR 1JH0NE ('127-)-56i- 456'7- FAX (7Z7) 5624576 FLOitEAICE EAJMCMP IRS 1SES Z66 PRLss1DB�T- S`f Dyw��i�✓ + FL 734 OOOry FAX NUMBER: 734 00Ce u,AjepaE PN14- t.1PS 2SG 1PlLGCjGG�.1T STS O tJNC'��i rL 7.3 4- O 00 6 FAX NUMBER : �A7T1 -r+* E' A e GN / T'b T I.V G 1434 •&4^) PHONE NUMBER 73A -3:74'? FAX NUMBER : 7-3 3 - 3 7 4 9 I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAA representations made in this application Swo to and subscribed before me this day of are true and accurate to the best of my A.D., -*T to me and /or imowledge. by' Al ho is ersonally known t 11-� me ar has pr ;.4. —Cd as identi$ cation. my commission exp*e;: MY✓COMMISSION # DD200435 EXPIRES May 26, 2001 'E :•mod ` BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE INC. T erg (10) copies of the pm niinary plat must be Submitted. The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 1CTia and shall not exceed 24" X 3 6" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; 111 Lt UNUtH W1-11Cti 1 Ht P11, 'rUF e,! NLn i NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IUtN 1 WICA 11ON CLtAHLY S 1 A 1 1N 1 HA I 1 Ht UHA ONU 15 A 'r HtL1'jA1NAHY PLA 1: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; t= ;I1NGANUFHUPOStU1:10-4 1S- OFm'WA, ANUtnStMtN1 , PROPOSED STREET NAMES; NA'ItS, PPHOF'HIA 1 tLY POS11IUNtU, O, AU,101N;NG FAA , - C ' all 1'a c 1 DEC V V 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL MINILLON r. V!t bLH ZNuLLNIN UT LUijP:! PIRI.LAS CO PY� FLORIDA 50199179 02 -27 -2003 0`x:02:31 TNB 51 DED49ILLIPSIELORENCE ENTERPRISES 00510 I9:03078115 BK:125f-2 TG:0288 EPG:0489 RECORDING 002 PAGES 1 $10.50 DOC STAMP - DR219 3 $2,450.00 TOTAL: $2,460.50 CHECK .TENDERED: $2,460.50 CIiAf tE $.0G BY __ PUTY C _EERK 03 -078 113 FES -27 -2003 S : 01AM PINELLPS CO SK 12582 PC III! IIIII!! Ill allillllll !flllliililllllltlilll4 296 WARRANTY DEED (Statutory Form - Section 689.02 F.S.) THIS INDENTURE, made this C day of February, 2003, between WAYNE H. PHILLIPS, a married man, whose mailing address is 256 President Street, Dunedin, Florida 34698, Grantor *, and FLORENCE ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose post office address is 603 Indian Rocks Road, Belleair, Florida 33756, Grantee. WITNESSETH, that said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and no/100 ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has sold, granted, bargained, assigned, set over and transferred to the said Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described property, situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida, to -wit: LOTS 11 AND 12, A REPLAT OF BLOCKS 80 AND 81 OF UNIT 5 MANDALAY, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 24, Page 80, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. With a street address of: 605 Poinsettia Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33767. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. SUBJECT TO: Easements, restrictions and reservations of record and taxes for the year 2003 and all subsequent years. '' F " F ` Page 1 of 2 D 0 � �`1"it NT This instrument prepared by to: and return Thomas W. Ruggles, P.A. ;! >; 603 Indian Rocks RoLd ?41% M - . Belleair, FL 33756 -2056 _._ ...._... {°.i MINILLON r. V!t bLH ZNuLLNIN UT LUijP:! PIRI.LAS CO PY� FLORIDA 50199179 02 -27 -2003 0`x:02:31 TNB 51 DED49ILLIPSIELORENCE ENTERPRISES 00510 I9:03078115 BK:125f-2 TG:0288 EPG:0489 RECORDING 002 PAGES 1 $10.50 DOC STAMP - DR219 3 $2,450.00 TOTAL: $2,460.50 CHECK .TENDERED: $2,460.50 CIiAf tE $.0G BY __ PUTY C _EERK 03 -078 113 FES -27 -2003 S : 01AM PINELLPS CO SK 12582 PC III! IIIII!! Ill allillllll !flllliililllllltlilll4 296 WARRANTY DEED (Statutory Form - Section 689.02 F.S.) THIS INDENTURE, made this C day of February, 2003, between WAYNE H. PHILLIPS, a married man, whose mailing address is 256 President Street, Dunedin, Florida 34698, Grantor *, and FLORENCE ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose post office address is 603 Indian Rocks Road, Belleair, Florida 33756, Grantee. WITNESSETH, that said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and no/100 ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has sold, granted, bargained, assigned, set over and transferred to the said Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described property, situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida, to -wit: LOTS 11 AND 12, A REPLAT OF BLOCKS 80 AND 81 OF UNIT 5 MANDALAY, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 24, Page 80, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. With a street address of: 605 Poinsettia Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33767. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. SUBJECT TO: Easements, restrictions and reservations of record and taxes for the year 2003 and all subsequent years. '' F " F ` Page 1 of 2 D 0 � �`1"it NT OR,JINAL Warranty Deed by and between Wayne H. Phillips, a married man (Grantor) and Florence Enterprises, L.L.C. (Grantee) PINELLAS COUNTY FLR OFF , REC .8K 12562 PG 289 AND said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all other persons whomsoever. THE subject property is not now and has never been the Homestead of the Grantor, who resides at 256 President Street, Dunedin, Florida 34698. THIS DEED WAS PREPARED, EXECUTED AND DELIVERED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF AN EXAMINATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE TO THE PROPERTY OR A SURVEY THEREOF. Property Appraiser's Parcel No. - 05- 29 -15- 54810 - 000 -0110 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Witnesses: Print Name LIAS WRIIGGI-ES- '91ME Print Tfame STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing document was acknowledged before me on the _t!- day of February, 2003 by WAYNE H. PHILLIPS, who: Mis personally known to me, or ❑ is not personally known- to me, who produced as identification. N if DEC 0 8 2004 PLAKINING DEPARTMENT CITY OF QLFARWAIER C.�Serwr.WPOo;cmenls'rslelt PlanningNP ILLEPSThdlt?s Florence LC605.W0.wpd A i 1110: NOTARY PUBLIC State of Florida at Large Commission Number & Expiration Date: Thomas W. Ruggles S•j :.= Vy COMMISSION r DD005697 EXPjpFS April 8, 20 .r5 80NDED'42L' TQOY FAIN 1NjUR ALICE. !NC Page 2 of 2 � L' = 'Q�i d L - - i PLANNING & DEVD-- OPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE ;y- P�� \�i AR STORM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR POINSETTIA PLACE Q R I G I A I 605 POINSETTIA AVENUE CLEARWATER BEACH, FL SECTION 05, TOWNSHIP 29S, RANGE 15E PINELLAS COUNTY, FL PREPARED FOR FLORENCE ENTERPRISES, LLC 256 PRESIDENT STREET DUNEDIN, FL 34698 P 2 MAY 2004 =! q ' �' �r • Q JULY 2004 �' j E; p , POINSETTIA PLACE 605 POINSETTIA DRIVE A��I N�' CLEARWATER BEACH, FL LOTS 11 & 12, A REPLAT OF BLOCKS 80 & 81 OF UNIT 5, MANDALAY, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 24, PAGE 80, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA SECTION 05, TOWNSHIP 29S, RANGE 15E STORM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS WATER QUALITY TREATMENT DRAINAGE AREA = 0.24 Ac. ORIGINAL PROVIDE WATER QUALITY TREATMENT FOR FIRST Y2" OF RUNOFF: Q = 0.24 x 0.50/12 x 43,560 = 436 C.F. STAGE /STORAGE RELATIONSHIP: DETENTION POND STAGE SURFACE AREA STORAGE AVAILABLE (EL.) (S.F.) (C.F.) 4.25 350 0 4.50 623 122 5.00 1193 579 REQUIRED STORAGE EL. (WEIR SLOT INV. EL.) = 4.84 SEE PLAN FOR DETAIL SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE (SHWT) & AQUIFER DETERMINATION: AVG. GROUND EL. @ DRI LOCATION = 4.3 DEPTH TO SHWT = 2.5 EST. SHWT EL. = 1.8 AVG. GROUND EL. IN VICINITY OF DETENTION POND = 4.3 EST. DEPTH TO AQUIFER = 5.0'* EST. AQUIFER EL. _ ( -) 0.7 AVG. VERTICAL PERMEABILITY* = 9.7 IN /HR X 1 FT /12 IN X 24 HR/DAY = 19.4 FT /DAY AVG. HORIZONTAL PERMEABILITY* = 19.4 FT /DAY X 2 = 38.8 FT /DAY USE SAFETY FACTOR OF 2 FOR GROUNDWATER MOUNDING ANALYSIS = 38.8 FT /DAY / 2 = 19.4 FT /DAY * - BASED ON "SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION" REPORT PREPARED BY BTL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., JOB NO. 5012 -04 -1374. MODRET HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT — RATIONAL HYDROGRAPH METHOD Hydrograph Name POINSETTIA PLACE Contributing Basin Area Runoff Coefficient C Time of Concentration Rainfall Depth . Storm-D�arat.ion Ji,_ANNING & DEVELOPMENT SEPVIGE`x II G, ry OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL Wednesday, 7/28/2004 0.24 ac. 0.80 15.00 min 9.00 " 24.00 hrs MQDRET 0.1080 0.0972 0.0864 0.0756 01% 0.0648 u 0.0540 L6 O 0.0482 a 0.0324 RESULTS OF RUNOFF HYDROGRARH NAME DR NODE ID : POINSETTIA PLACE 0.0216 0.0108 0.0000 0.00 2.50 5.00 7.50 10.00 12.50 15.00 17.50 20.00 22.50 25.00 TIME (hrs) A sax : CL OP cfs Time of Amax : 0. 25 trs V_total 622&1 ft3 z Z ,L , z ! (( �.rGZ T ly a A m z -� J CD MODRET ELEVATION VS OVERFLOW RELATIONSHIP V NOTCH, SHARP & BROAD CRESTED WEIRS Structure Type SHARP CRESTED Crest Elevation 4.84 ft Crest Length 1.00 ft Coefficient of Discharge 3.33 Weir Flow Exponent 1.50 Number of Contractions 2.00 Design High Water Level Elevation 5.00 ft ✓„ EC!L- LEZ PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ORIGINAL EERVICFS - - 'UTY'? CL J`�Ai ER Wednesday, 7/28/2004 MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERORIGINAL POND NAME /No. : POINSETTIA PLACE HYDROGRAPH RUNOFF DATA UNSATURATED ANALYSIS INCLUDED Pond Bottom `� 'r N Area �� T�, � � i�= U I� � ^'�� 350.00 ft2 Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL �p 1579.00 ft3 Pond Length to Width Ratio ( L/W ) q 16.00 Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base -PLANNING &- DFVELOP ENS' —0.70 ft Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Tab1e1y0F %LEARWfkTER 1.80 ft Elevation of Pond Bottom 4.25 ft Is there Overflow ? y Ave. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsat. 0.20 Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity 19.40 ft /d Factor of Safety 2.00 Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity 38.80 ft /d Ave. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Sat. 0.20 Average Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond 1.00 Time Increment during Storm Event 2.00 hrs Time Increment after Storm Event 12.00 hrs Total Number of Increments after Storm Event 6.00 Hydrogr.aph Name & Node : PP101 — POINSETTIA PLACE Time of Peak Discharge : 0.25 hrs Rate of Peak Discharge : 0.07 cfs Groundwater Control Features: Top Bottom Left Right Flag N N N N Distance to edge of pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Elevation of water level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page 1 Wednesday, 7/28/2004 MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS - TABLE FORMAT POND NAME / NO.: POINSETTIA PLACE CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW (hrs) (feet) RATE (cfs) RATE (cfs) (ft3) 00.00 - 0.00 1.800 0.000 * 0.00 0.00 1.800 0.09103 0.08037 0.00 3.22 4.082 0.06971 0.06309 0.00 5.22 4.166 0.05971 0.05633 0.00 7.22 4.312 0.05560 0.05488 0.00 9.22 4.471 0.05489 0.05491 0.00 11.22 4.631 0.05518 0.05545 0.00 13.22 4.785 0.05383 0.05220 82.48 15.22 4.863 0.04981 0.04742 248.80 17.22 4.877 0.04571 0.04401 446.80 19.22 4.881 0.04283 0.04165 663.37 21.22 4.884 0.04073 0.03981 893.71 23.22 4.886 0.03609 0.01374 893.71 35.22 4.117 0.01073 0.00771 893.71 47.22 3.685 0.00639 0.00507 893.71 59.22 3.401 0.00435 0.00363 893.71 71.22 3.198 0.00320 0.00276 893.71 83.22 3.043 0.00247 0.00218 893.71 95.22 2.921 0.00249 MaxWL: 4.886 @ 23.22 h * RO = INF M.Ovf: 0.032cfs @ 23.2 h ORIGINAL Page 1 Wednesday, 7/28/2004 ANNING & '- )PVFLgPMENT R- � G CLWCoverSheet E C`' ' ��C v .a ,C I pLpMING & pFVEt_OPMENT ScRVI(',Es CITY OV FLD2004 -04029 605 POINSETTIA AVE Date Received: 04/28/2004 POINSETTIA PLACE ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 258A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW CK,W.E- DATE FLD2004=04029 605 POINSETTIA AVE Date Received: 04/28/2004 POINSETTIA PLACE ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 258A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet I-ffl CK. NO. 099 BATE �� - 0k8 PLT2004=00004 605 POINSETTIA AVE Date Received: 04/28/2004 POINSETTIA PLACE ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 258A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet Pipellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 66377 000 0080 Page 2 of 5 05 / 29 / 15 / 00377 / 000 / 0010 i7 -Sep -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:17:37 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales PHILLIPS, WAYNE H OBK: 15952 OPG: 1310 PHILLIPS, GAY M 605 POINSETTIA AUE # 8 CLEARWATER FL 33767 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: .00 sales from 2005 - 2006: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price {Qual /UnQ} Vac /Imp Plat Information 8 /2,007 15,95211,310 425,000 {Q} I 2005: Book 130 Pgs 030- 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book. Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 69,800 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 69,800 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 69,800 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Tax: 1,619.24 Land Size Unit Land Land Land 07 Prop Tax: 1,391.59 Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1} 0 x 0 75. 00 1.216. 00 S 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be : 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 i,391.59 6} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be : 1,391.59 Short Legal PARK PLACE TOWNHOMES LOT i Description Building Information http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/egi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 66377 000 0080 05-/ 29 / 15 / 00377 000 / 0010 Page 3 of 5 17- Sep -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser i5:i7:37 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 233 Land Use: 00 Vacant Extra Fca�ures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) F+_1 R Fil T Fq http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =l &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 i P4nellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 66377 000 0080 i I-G-117— r A'JE � rA "�DALAY AVE T � Rl, Y J G 2 2 03436 r� DE G37 � 35 ESPLANADEESPLLAN SAY Page 4 of 5 2 E'S AY S AN A.�E rn Un S),UO L0FL.RN £ tJ t L Y P'R'l r AVE � CYPRUS S 606 r AVE Y, f�'} ESPLA.NA.D QO Y L k� 'YPRU L PR S AVE D AY + r JUANITA 58A � AVEi�� SPLDAN F�] WAY _YPPUS AVE r I— CYPRUS BAY 603 'P. AVF SPLANADE r-- 1ANDALAY COIvM NITY � AVE 0INXTTIII CHIg H ` AVE s7 S7A ESPLANADE SPLANADE s AD �~— SDI z L MANDALA- 40 5 AVE RY DE a X548I SPLLANADE ESPLLANAD L— —1 T L_ � 54792 1 (SAY ESPLANADE 33/01 69 a, Y 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http : //136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 Pipellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 66377 000 0080 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http: // 136 .174.187.13 /htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 Pinell1as County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 66377 000 0020 Page 2 of 5 05 / 29 / 15 / 00377 / 000 / 0030 17- Sep -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:20:05 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales ORUBB, JOHN 0 OBK: 15847 OPG: 0193 6RUBB, TAMMY L 605 POINSETTIA AUE # 6 CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1610 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: .00 sales from 2005 - 2006: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 6 /2,007 15,847/ 193 672,400 (Q) I 2005: Book 130 Pgs 030- 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book. Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 69,800 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 69,800 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 69,800 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Tax: 1,619.24 Land Size Unit Land Land Land 07 Prop Tax: 1,391.59 Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1) 0 x 0 75. 00 1,216. 00 S 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 1,391.59 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, .2007 taxes will be 1,391.59 Short Legal PARK PLACE TOWNHOMES LOT 3 Description Building Information http: //l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b =1 &c Il &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3= 1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 66377 000 0020 05 1 29 / 15 1 00377 1 000 1 0030 Page 3 of 5 17 -Sep -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 15:20:06 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 233 Land Use: 00 Vacant EXTra F0aTurqBS Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) F*_1 F+_1 T T Fq Fq http : / /136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =l &b =l &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 Pinellas County Property. Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 66377 000 0020 Page 4 of 5 --YT 1111 's, '.'J C72 6 ry €'L \29,39 INS[ SP ANIL& OD AVE LAY I -Y AVE ,'AFL B A.DE 637 C L .2a JE5PL 61- '' �3 MAND,LAY ` BAY BAY BAY AVE 622 ESPLANADFE PLA ANA E I N��-T 71 F rte; BAY ym I 0 612 IT D Y SPHN'AD ESPEL'ANYAD ' !�,I 12 A Y 6 9 rn CYPRUS Y, Foil y AVE ESPLANAD • ��LC J c Al .)T BAY A PR US N YP u Ln CYPRUS L AVE EI AY 83 bul r N CY5PRUS BAY JUANITA E,84 AVE SPL ANAL _I(PRUS WA 579 Y AVE CYPRUS 60.3 ):P AVE SPLA DE I'-- ANDALAY COWUNIly AVE E7I CHWH (Q OIN K in cy V AY us7 574 BAY E 13 z ESPLANADE 5PLANADE IAD L -1 M A N%OA1 L A AO 0 6A 566 AVE BAY BAY AY LAN, OE CL SPLANADE ESPLBANAD T S479-2- (BAY ESPLANAFE i r 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r--.16&s=4&t3=1&u=0 &p=0... 9/17/2007 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 66377 000 0020 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http: // 136.174.187.131htbinlcgi- click ?o =t &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 " f,Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 66377 000 0030 Page 2 of 5 05 / 29 / 15 / 00377 / 000 / 0040 17- Sep -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:22:08 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales DUMMAR, ANDREW H OBK: 15906 OPG: 0683 DUMMAR, JENNIFER 605 POINSETTIA AUE # 5 CLEARWATER FL 33767 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: .00 sales from 2005 - 2006: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 7 /2,007 15,906/ 683 615,000 (Q) I 2005: Book 130 Pgs 030- 0 10 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book- Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 { ) 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 69,800 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 69,800 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 69,800 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Tax: 1,619.24 Land Size Unit Land Land Land 07 Prop Tax: 1,391.59 Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1) 0 x 0 75.00 1,216.00 S 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2) 0.x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 1,391.59 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be 1,391.59 Short Legal PARK PLACE TOWNHOMES LOT 4 Description Building Information http : / /136.174.187.131htbinlcgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3= 1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 •-� , Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 66377 000 0030 05 / 29 1 15 1 00377 f 000 / 0040 Page 3 of 5 17- Sep -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 15:22:09 Vacant Parcel Property Use; 233 Land Use; 00 Vacant Extra F�eatur�s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year, 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 0 http: / /136.174.187.13/htbinlcgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 ,.j � Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 66377 000 0030 I F L FO Al y IA I It 7 rD A'y Fes] I F- I f IAD I LI,,- �T 03436 1 1 _. L--j ry 11 y a, I-- W m z 0 C. Page 4 of 5 E rn CA r i t S -4792 (BAY ESPLANADE 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http : / /136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 66377 000 0030 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http: // l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r— .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 03436 000 1010 Page 2 of 5 05 / 29 / 15 / 00377 / 000 / 0080 i7- Sep -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:16:53 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales MINER, CHARD C OBK: 15790 OPG: 0203 MINER, ELIZABETH A 774 SAINT ANNE DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 -3403 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract: .00 sales from 2005 - 2006: 0 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 5 /2,007 15,7901 203 632,400 (0) I 2005: Book 130 Pgs 030- 0 10 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 69,800 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 69,800 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 69,800 Agricultural: 0 2007 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Tax: 1,619.24 Land Size Unit Land Land Land 07 Prop Tax: 1,391.59 Front x Depth Price Units Meth 07 Millage: 19.9371 1) 0 x 0 75.00 1.216.00 S 07 Spec Asmt: .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2007 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 1,391.59 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2007 taxes will be 1,391.59 Short Legal PARK PLACE TOWNHOMES LOT 8 Description Building Information http: / /136.174.187.131htbinlcgi- click ?o =l &a =l &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 03436 000 1010 05 / 20 / 15 / 80377 / 000 / 0080 Page 3 of 5 i7- Sep -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:16:53 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 233 Land Use: 00 Vacant EXTr;:_1 Fcatures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) ID, R ®141 Fil F I http : / /l36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 03436 000 1010 Page 4 of 5 1 & ROYAL WAY M A NN� AY 636 647 BAY CT) INSETTI• S P L A 114A711, AVE MANDALAY 1 11.. I/ P [7 AVE A 61 . a E LAt AD[ ESP[ hA A tfl� AY ;/ E$P%NADFE PLA ANA I INSETT1111, F— — y AVE 034-36 L BAY WAY 6 B L. A P Ec 630 B BA\( 13AY 612 SPLANAD ESPLANAD IDA Y' AIV + AVE BAY C Y ''is 608 Fj] 606 ESPLANAD YPRU 605 AL AVE w CYPRUS 606 ST T AVE BAY 1zT 1 1`10 C ESPLANAD 0 �D 6 T Y LD Y Li L AVE a' :583 Ll 0 AY T PPUS SPLAN D AVE JUANITA < - r-,%Ij WAY AVE 579 FcD] I-- C Y1, R�'S BAY G03 . SPLANADE r- ��ANQALAY Imm COWUN11Y AVE LLJ CH�ff H 7 57-4 01NX171 $7 (n BAY M Bea z ESPLANADE ► SPLANADE 4AD 601 ftv1AjNQALA AO 6�1 S66 'IE j BAY F- AVE I BAY BAY LANADE CL 54810 c5)l`LAl,,]ADE ESPLANAD 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r--.16&s=4&t3=1&u=0 &p=0... 9/17/2007 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 03436 000 1010 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http : //l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi- click ?o =l &a =l &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p =0... 9/17/2007 Wells, Wayne From: Dougall- Sides, Leslie Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:51 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Hollander, Gwen; Treuhaft, Linda Subject: Request for Legal Services, Special Warranty Deeds for TDRs Importance: High I have reviewed Attachment A and Attachment B and have the following comments: 10 1. Attachment A, , Case Nos.:FLD2003- 12069/TDR2003 -12005 [/200 Brightwater Drive]: a. This Deed is not a Special Warranty Deed; b. This Deed does not contain the covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of the parcel from which the rights have been transferred. Therefore, this Deed does not meet the requirements of Section 4- 1402(3). 2. Attachment B, Case Nos. FLD2004- 04029/TDR2004 -08009 [200 Brightwater Drive /605 Poinsettia Avenue]: This Deed meets the requirements of Section 4- 1402(3). Gwen, please call Ms. Stough 733 -3769 and advise that her Deed is o.k. from City's standpoint for closing. , Linda, please work with me to create a Special Warranty Deed form for applicants re Transfer of Development Rights. Attachment B above to Wayne's memo is a good starting point. Leslie K. Dougall -Sides (7 Assistant City Attorney City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758 (727) 562 -4010 phone (727) 562 -4021 fax Board Certified in City, County and Local Government Law Admitted in Florida, Oregon, and the District of Columbia Senior Professional in Human Resources 1q.- „ 'e Clearwater REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES FORM TO: Le��,2 �p� c`1`- S;a� FROM: W 1' s Ext. No? AUTHORIZED BY: DepartmentHea (FSigna e COPY TO: Pamela K. Akin, City Attorney w/o attachments SUBJECT: Request for Legal Services 2 C 0,� \,) o.r rte... e�c ai � i 7 Re: 5 ? f ,S DATE: Z-1 I S-1 'D 7 Service Required: (Click on appropriate box) Review and comment on document Draft document Written opinion requested Advise ri 1. Brief factual background of the request or problem: 5 e.e_ 2. Specific questions to be answered: S ce- 3. Identify prior legal assistance on this or a related matter and the name of the attorney who handled it: "61. If . i a! 4. List and /or attach (all supporting documentation, related materials and known authorities, i.e., statute, ordinance, resolution, administrative code, legal case, contract, lease letter, memorandum, prior legal opinion): 5.4- vt -C, a MEMORANDUM TO: Leslie Dougall -Sides ��% FROM: Wayne Wells (Ext. 4504) Y" M"" DATE: February 15, 2007 RE: Special Warranty Deeds for TDRs Section 4- 1402.3 requires Special Warranty Deeds (Deeds) for the transfer of development rights from a sending to a receiving parcel. As I have sent some Deeds to you in August 2006, I have had additional Deeds submitted for two projects that have been approved by the Community Development Board (CDB). Please review these Deeds to determine if these recorded documents meet the Code provisions in Division 14 of Article 4 (worded properly, contain any required Code references, etc.) and if there are any other documents, agreements, statements, etc. that should be submitted along with the Deeds. If there are changes to any of the recorded Deeds or if there are any additional documents necessary, I will coordinate with the appropriate applicant. Attached are copies of Deeds for the following projects: Attachment A —190 Brightwater Drive Attachment B — 605 Poinsettia Avenue Patti Stough has informed me of an urgent need to review at least Attachment B soon, as they have a closing next week. UAMy Documents\Request for Legal Services for review of TDR Special Warranty DeedsNemorandum to Leslie Dougall - Sides.doc ATTACHMENT A CASE NUMBERS: FLD2003- 12069/TDR2003 -12005 APPROVED BY CDB: JUNE 15, 2004 RECEIVING SITE; 190 BRIGHTWATER SENDING SITE: 620 BAYWAY BOULEVARD UAMy Documents\Request for Legal Services for review. of TDR Special Warranty Deeds\ATTACHMENT A COVER SHEET.doc DENSTIY TRANSFER WARRANTY DEED THIS IDENTURE made this 8th, day of August, 2006 by and between Pankaj Patel, Party of the first part, whose mailing address is 130 Brightwater Dr. #9, Clearwater, FL 33767, and Twin Palms of Clearwater LLC , a Florida Limited Liability company, Party of the second part, whose mailing address is 200 Brightwater Drive, Clearwater, Florida, 033767 WITNESSETH: That the said party of the First Part, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to it in hand paid by the said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, and bargained and sold to the said Party of the Second Part, its heirs and assigns forever, ONE UNIT OF DENSTIY from the following described land, situate lying and being in the City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to -wit: Lots 9, 10, of Bayside Subdivision No. 5, According to Plat Book 38, Pages 38,39 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. To be used by Party of the Second Part in connection with development to be constructed on the following described land, situate lying and being in the City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to -wit: Lots 34 and 35 of Bayside Subdivision No. 2, as Recorded in Plat Book 27, Pages 32 and 33 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first pair has hei•eiziito -set his hand and seal the day and year first above written intending-hereby to restrict, in perpetuity, 'the. use of the property first described above. ame: Pankaj Patel -- Pri nt Name / % /)' �� '�. ` °? C A . Title: Print Name_..._ �.i p, i \.i�c�/ic /4 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before me, an_officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgements, Pankaj Patel,Lto me personally known?or who has produced as identification and who did take an oath, and known to me to be the individual (s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of such entity and he acknowledged before me that he executed the same for the purposes therein expressed as the duly authorized representative of such limited liability company. WITNESS my hand and official seal at Clearwater, said County and State, this 8th day of August, 2006. ,LytiM'PY¢�,. RONALD M.ALIQUSTINE r MY COMMISSION#DD409645 Notary Public Y i EXPIRES: July 16, 2009 80t- Thou! Notary Public UMenvtles Print Name: Ronald. M. Augustine My Commission Expires: 7 -16 -09 GOO 2 9 T. G6T�mZ N C U).00 0 in Na om2� L4 () x :0 .5 r, r, r ZjvoGO C5 m +o W N Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:34 AM To: Patti Stough (E -mail) Subject: 605 Poinsettia Avenue Patti - As you may already know, the City Attorney's office approved the Special Warranty Deed for the Transfer of Development Rights for the project at 605 Poinsettia Avenue. Accordingly, I have changed the Certificate of Occupancy - Zoning condition on BCP2005 -04039 to "met ". ' Wayne t .. .. :: VI Patti The &rbitett, Int. September 14, 2005 Wayne Wells City Of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S Myrtle Clearwater, Fl RE: FLD2004 -04029 605 Poinsettia Ave Dear Wayne, SEP 14 2005 Thank you for your help and response to our revisions to the above referenced applications. All untilities from the ROW to building shall be underground and conduits shall be provided as required by the utility companies parallel and within the ROW for future burial of these lines (We are in the process of meeting with the appropriate utilities). A -3 We have bubbled and modified the plans in accordance with you comments. You shall find the height of the building reduced, consistent with our CDB approval. The balusters shall be as originally approved. Drafting error. Roof has been lowered to accommodate reduction in area of roof seating area. Barrall tile is now shown over stair areas. All Elec meters shall be above the flood plane and in accordance with Progress Energy Requirements. Sink stub out has been removed. Unit numbers are now consistent with the Plat. Plat HAS been approved and recorded (2 Months ago). The civil modifications are strictly, drafting errors. The drive on the south edge of Unit 8 shall be curbed as requested. Wayne, should you have any questions or need further information do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Pa hitect, Inc. Patricia M. Stough, AIA AR0010684 PMS laws 1634 SAN ROY DRIVE - DUNEDIN, FL 34698 - 727 - 733 -3769 - AA C002103 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Ms. Patti Stough Patti the Architect, Inc. 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, FL 34698 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562 -4576 RE: Development Order - Cases FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 605 Poinsettia Avenue Dear Ms. Stough: January 20, 2005 This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On January 18, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit eight attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 11.3 feet (to building), reductions to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 8.52 feet (to the northeast corner of the ground floor of the building), from 20 feet to 5.52 feet (to ground floor stoop) and from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to second through fourth floor balconies), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 37 feet (to roof deck) with an additional four feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 12.67 feet for a roof top pavilion (from roof deck) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right -of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, (2) Transfer of Development Rights for one dwelling unit from 200 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4 -1403 (TDR2004- 08009) and (3) Preliminary Plat approval for eight townhome lots (PLT2004- 00004). The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applications with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 803.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3 -913; 3. The proposal is in compliance with Beach by Design; and 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 200 Brightwater Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 200 Brightwater Drive due to the transfer of BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR - COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR- COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYF,R January 20, 2005 Stough — Page Two development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (200 Brightwater.Drive) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That either a subdivision plat or a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That all plans indicate a 12 -foot radius canopy for the 12 -inch DBH oak tree to the rear of the property prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) , be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s) -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 6. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; and 7. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (January 18, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on February 1, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts /planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Si_}cerely Gpe4w4o Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnaciive or Finished Applications Woinsettia 605 Poinsettia Place (7) - ApprovedlPoinsettia 605 Development Order.doc LL FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TO: FAX: -7 3 3.3-7 1 FROM• ' Phone: Q.t ate- •� (v 2 -_4 S' +04 DATE:_ ` 0 RE: �f b � o : r,,%C.1'fi c� MESSAGE: U� j NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) Z- Jan. 16 2005 12:37PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater -Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97333769 Jan.16 12:36PM 00,58 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' ##04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR ' -'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1- 800 - HELP -FAX (435- 7329). ..:e LL FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TO: i Qki; ) -N--b FAX: .. . 133 • 370 Phone: S �... _ \ t f FROM: W Q.� lS Phone: 2- O 4 DATE:_ f 3_ I O. RE: U Q,S N"%C,.spk & MESSAGE: of ()Pool 1T NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) K- , Jan. 13 2005 01:03PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater -Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97333769 Jan.13 01:02PM 01'17 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1- 800 - HELP -FAX (435- 7329). Jan. 13 2005 01:05PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater -Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97333769 Jan.13 01:04PM 00'59 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR ' -'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1 -600- HELP -FAX (435- 7329). LL FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 TO: FAX: . -733- '3-7 to i FAX: (727) 562 -4865 Phone: FROM:_ 4-1 p-As Phone: S to 2 - 4- DATE:.— _� I o IDS RE:_ Fl-P Zoo 4- - 0 4 U Z- 6 0 3 �Se 4-,` o.. h1t MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 1 Jan. 10 2005 10:29AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater -Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97333769 Jan.10 10:26AM 03'36 SND 09 OK FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1- 800 -HELP -FAX (435- 7329). I IIIIII Patti lZbe Oftrbitect, Inc. December 27, 2004 Wayne Wells City Of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S Myrtle Clearwater, A RE: FLD2004 -04029 605 Poinsettia Ave Dear Wayne, Thank you for your help and prompt response to our revisions to the above referenced applications. We have addressed all of your concerns in the resubmitted of documents A -1, Engineering Plans 1 of 5 and 2 of 5. Plus we have made modifications to the verbiage within the Flexible development Application. The modified pages were re- inserted by Al Rutledge. ' With respect to your concern on the Florida Building Code requirements regarding openings with 8 feet of the property line. We have reviewed the code, calculated our window and door openings (8.2 %) and are well within the required 10% openings for a Type V, sprinklered, unprotected, Bulding within 3 to 10 feet of the property line. Wayne, should you have any questions or need further information do not hesitate to call. C. P, 1. M Stow AIA IqQQ1668A:•.•° PHIS %aws .••��`' 1634 SAN ROY DRIVE • DUNEDIN, FL 34698 • 727 -733 -3769 • AA C002103 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Patti the Architect, Inc. 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, FL 34698 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562 -4576 December 22, 2004 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case Nos. FLD2004-04029/TDR2004- 08009/PLT2004- 00004) Dear Ms. Stough: The Case Nos. FLD2004- 04029 /TDR2004- 08009/PLT2004 -00004 for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit eight attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 11.3 feet (to building), reductions to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 8.52 feet (to the northeast corner of the ground floor of the building), from 20 feet to 5.52 feet (to ground floor stoop) and from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to second through fourth floor balconies), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 37 feet (to roof deck) with an additional four feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 12.67 feet for a roof top pavilion (from roof deck) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right -of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, (2) Transfer of Development Rights for one dwelling unit from 200 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4 -1403 (TDR2004- 08009) and (3) Preliminary Plat approval for eight townhome lots (PLT2004- 00004), for property located at 605 Poinsettia Avenue, has been deemed sufficient and has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on January 18, 2005. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3 floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727 -562 -4504. Sincerely, �\. W&4 k)0' -L- Wa e Wells, AICP yn 1�1. Planner III S: (Planning DepartnnentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIPoinsettia 605 Poinsettia Place (T) 1.18.05 CDB - WMPoinsettia 605 CDB Letter. doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR- COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR- COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER Bll.l. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER '.' .. _ ?' FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TO: FAX: 7Z33 -37b9 Phone: S (,w,.Q— FROM: W Phone: DATE:. _ �Z� Zt 1,0+ —RE: +- 1'1 -�1� Za0 9 u', N4e�'}iti . MESSAGE: 1C:v.v C' r"g - +1r\; 3 w 0'i 4A Q. �1�.a Ito ` 44�'- NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) Z s V, Dec. 21 2004 07:28PM YOUR LOGO : cityOfClearwater -Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. : 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97333769 Dec.21 07:27PM 01'06 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04• THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+,' OR ' -' . -800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). FOR FAX AWANTRGE ASS I STANCE' PLEASE CALL 1 FLD2004- 04029, 605 Poinsettia Avenue Submit 15 copies (signed & sealed) of Sheets 1 & 2 of 5 of the Civil Site Plan, Sheet A -1 and the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria/responses as. outlined below: 1. Site plans do not show the columns as indicated on the 8.5 "xlI" floor plan drawing in the proposed locations (not consistent) and do not show the proposed 11.3 -foot front setback that is proposed. Revise Sheets 1 & 2 of 5. 2. The northeast corner of the building is proposed at 8.52 feet on Sheet 1 of 5. The rear stoop is dimensioned at three feet deep on Sheet A -1. The dimension shown is a 6.22 feet setback on Sheet 1 of 5. Shouldn't this dimension be closer to 5.52 feet, based on the three -foot depth? Advise /revise Sheet 1 of 5. 3. The northeast corner of the building is proposed at 8.52 feet on Sheet 1 of 5. The rear balconies are dimensioned at 2.5 feet deep on Sheet A -1. Dimension shown on Sheet 1 of 5 is 6.22 feet. Shouldn't the dimension be 6.02 feet? Advise /revise Sheet 1 of 5. 4. Provide on the floor plans the depth from the exterior wall of bay windows, eaves; etc. Revise Sheet A -1. 5. Provide the width of units (if all equal, state "typical ") on Sheet A -1. ' 6. Provide responses to the ten Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria in the same format as responses to the General Applicability criteria have been provided. Revise any responses as previously requested at the DRC. A narrative introducing the project is very helpful and may be additionally provided. 7. Comment from Planning not addressed: "While the Zoning Code provides for setbacks and certain "flexibility" for setbacks, the Building Code also has "setbacks," but relating to the materials and allowable openings of the structure in relation to the property line. The northeast corner of the building is proposed at approximately eight feet. Such a proposed setback may restrict the materials and allowable openings for all portions of the building less than eight feet from the property line. Advise as to whether Building Code provisions will alter the building as proposed, especially in light of openings. If revisions are necessary to also meet Building Code provisions, revise all necessary plans to reflect such." Provide response. Someone from your office will need to collate these revised sheets into the application packages when they are brought to the Planning Department. Need the revisions by Thursday, December 30, 2004. FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TO: � R#h S�'(st FAX: . 733- 3-To 9 Phone: FROM: -Phone: 57 6 Z - DATE:_ _ 9 . 3 �' RE: . g bJ� MESSAGE: v NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 47 .Ef ID I NG F'EF'UF'T Sep. 03 2004 04:49PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater -Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 U. LT HEK FHUbIMILE STHKI TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97333769 Sep.03 04:46PM 02'51 SND 07 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR ' -'. Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Patti Stough [pstough @verizon.net] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 4:20 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 605 Poinsettia Hi Wayne... Sorry i forgot to include a letter with the TDR Application on the above reference project. upon review of documents this am ... I also noted that the Land Use Date, submitted by Leo Governale is not correct. If you look at the survey and my summary of request... those ARE the Correct "existing" setbacks Information. We will update the Engineering plan for DRC... Trying to get this all right and easier for you to review Thank you for all your past help and patience... 7/29/2004 FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 TO: �CA FAX: —7 33 37�� Phone: 13 3 - 3 7 6 �l FROM:_ \s Phone: \0 21-'TS _ DATE:_ �9I u RE: 7..,0`0 -'0 0 Z3 4 S rio•-w. �. Q.,.�. ® �. ooh • o �-o z.. q�pc�' Zo�4- o 10 0 4 MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) SENDING REPORT Jun. 04 2004 04:56PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater -Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97333769 Jun.04 04:52PM 04'40 SND 11 OK W: l - �I- • • • •i: •�.� IM77 • r - 1.30 pm Case Number: FLD2004 -04U29 -- 605 POINSETTIA AVE Owner(s): Florence Enterprises 603 Indian Rocks Rd Belleair, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Florence Enterprises, Llc 256 President St Dunedin, Fl 34698 TELEPHONE: 733 -3769, Representative: Patti The Architect Inc FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email 1634 San Roy Dr Dunedin, Fl 34698 TELEPHONE: 727 - 733 -3769, FAX: 727 - 733 -3769, E -MAIL: parch @gate.net Location: 0.26 acres located on the east side of Poinsettia Avenue, approximately 300 feet north of Bay Esplanade (north of Clearwater Beach Recreation Complex). Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit seven attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to xx feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building and pavement), reductions to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to xx feet (to patios), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 39.25 feet (to roof deck) with an additional xx feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and an additional xx feet (from roof deck for a roof top pavillion), and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right -of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, and Preliminary Plat approval for seven townhome lots (PLT2004- 00004). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association - Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 827 Mandalay Ave TELEPHONE: 727 - 446 -5801, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: dmacnav @att.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner Attendees Included: City Staff: Chip Gerlock, Wayne Wells, Scott Rice, Joe Colbert Applicant/Representative: Patti Stough, Leo Governale The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 24 1) Need to install proposed sidewalk per City Standards (one -foot from property line), not as shown. 2) Need to install the sanitary sewer services within the grass areas between drives, not under the concrete driveways as shown. 3) Need to show the existing gas main along Poinsettia Avenue. 4) Need to show the fire line to the building for the fire sprinkler system. 5) Double detector check valve with bypass meter shall be required for any internal fire protection line. 6) Need to install a gate valve on both sides of proposed backflow device(s) if the fire line 4 -inch diameter or larger. 7) The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, set the water meter and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation cost. 8) Need two (2) fire hydrants installed to meet Fire Department requirements. All applicable fees to be paid for by the applicant. 9) Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device. 10) Lot lines per proposed plat must be shown on utility sheet. 11) Need to show where the mailboxes are going to be installed. 12) All planting within any easement will be installed at the property owner's risk. The City will not be responsible for any /all uprooted or damaged plants within easement(s) if the City needs to maintain/replace existing utility mains. 13) Where do visitors park? (Guests, service and delivery vehicles, etc.) Not shown on plans. 14) If applicable, need to show staging area. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1) Final plat recorded with Pinellas County. PLT2004 -00004 - ENGINEERING PLAT CONDITIONS: 1) Need boundary description of proposed plat on the plat. 2) "Plat Notations ", 3rd line, the word "however" is misspelled. Environmental: No issues. No Issues. Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 25 Show FDC at least 15 feet from the building and within 40 feet of a fire Hydrant dedicated to Fire Sprinkler System. PRIOR TO CDB. Provide a fire hydrant on the same side of the street and within 300 feet of the most remote point of the building. PRIOR TO CDB. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA 241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Plans submitted for Fire Review must reflect adherence to Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2001 Edition and the following Codes: NFPA 101, 2000 Edition, NFPA 70, 1999 Edition and Florida Statute 633. Show on a Code Reference Sheet. Fire Sprinkler installation shall be in accordance with NFPA 13, 1999 Edition by a licensed Fire Sprinkler Contractor under separate permit with drawings. Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 '/z feet in front of and to the sides of appliance. As per Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2001 Edition, modification to Section 3 -5.6 of NFPA 1. Please acknowledge intent to comply. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT Clearances of 7 % feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA 1, Sec.3 -5.6 Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT CLOUD ALL REVISIONS Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 _ No issues. Land Resources: I . The 12" Palm between lots 2 & 3is actually an Oak tree, revise plan and show the trees 12' radious canopy. Show prior to CDB. 2. Show root pruning requirements at the 12" oak tree if a cut in existing elevation is required under the canopy of this tree. Show prior to CDB. Landscaping: 1 . The site and archetectural plans do not match...? If the plans are overlayed the landscape is in the driveways and entry areas of the dwellings.. revise plans to match. 2. Per Section 3- 1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. 3 . Per Section 3- 1202.E.1. - 1 Tree /island minimum; 1 Tree /150 sq. ft. of required green space; Shrubs: 50% of required green space; and Groundcover shall be utilized for required green space in lieu of turf. 4. If the plan that the architect is proposing is used for the site, adjust the driveways that have abutting drives redesigned to create space between them for landscaping. The garage doors are narrower than the drives and can be matched on at least one side to create a wider island than what is proposed on the plan submitted. If the engineers plan is to be used, revise the architectural to match and provide access to the front doors in the landscape plans. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Recreation Facilities impact fees of $200 for each new residential unit is due prior to building permit issuance or final plat, whichever occurs first. If 2 residential units are existing and 7 proposed, $1,000 will be due for 5 net new units. Contact Deb Richter at 562 -4817 if any questions. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 26 1 . Prior to CDB: 1) The site is required to provide storm water attenuation and not just water quality. The proposed redevelopment comes under retrofit conditions where the developer obtains 1/2 credit for any existing impervious that is undergoing redevelopment. This site also qualifies for stormwater payment in lieu of retention if the developer wishes to apply. 2) Section A -A on Sheet 3 of 4 shows a TOB of 5.25 and pond bottom EL. of 4.5. The existing ground surface in this area is approximately EL. 4.3. On Section A -A, show grades required to build the pond as designed. This is of major concern as all the runoff will be directed to the rear of the site with a 3 inch deep swale to lead the overflow to the street. This design is not acceptable as the property to the east of this site could be. flooded out in a severe storm event.. The city will accept payment in lieu of retention only if the detention area is adjacent to the city street and it is suggested that one of the buildings be eliminated or all of the building footprints be reduced so as to create an area for detention along Poinsettia. Solid Waste: 1 . It is indicated that "black barrels" will be used for trash service. Where will they be stored? If proposed to be stored in the garages, will there be sufficient area inside to store the black barrel? Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. Demonstrate how two cars will fit in the enclosed garage. 2. Sight triangles are shown incorrectly on Sheets 1 and 2 of 4. The base of the triangles are to be along the property line as shown on Sheet L -1. 2. The above to be addressed prior to CDB. Traffic Impact Fee to be accessed and paid prior to C.O. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 27 I . The application lists the property owner as Wayne Phillips; however, the property Appraisers Office indicates the owner is Florence Enterprises. The deed recorded on February 27, 2003, also indicates Florence Enterprises as the owner. Revise the application. 2. The application lists the parcel size to be 11,550 square feet; however, the site plan indicates the parcel size to be 11,375 square feet. Revise either the application or the site plan to the correct parcel size. 3 . Complete the address for the agent on the application to include the city, state and zip code. 4. Complete the address for the applicant on the application to include the city, state and zip code. The applicant's email address is illegible. Revise. 5 . Sight triangles on the site plan and landscape plans are not drawn correctly. Sight triangles are 20'x20', measured along the property line and the each side of the edge of the driveways. 6. Remove existing site improvements from Sheets 1 and 2 of 4 of the civil site plan set, as this information is inconsequential and only makes the drawing confusing. Alternately, provide a separate demolition plan. 7. There is an inconsistency between the civil site plans prepared by Governale Engineering Services, Inc., the reduced 8.5'x11" site plans and the application. The civil site plans indicate the building to be set back 19.82 feet (Unit 1) from the front property line on the south side of the site and 19.86 feet (Unit 7) on the north side of the site. The reduced site plan and the application appear to indicate a different ground level building footprint and a front setback of 13 feet. Revise /coordinate. 8 . Show on the civil site plan the actual building footprint proposed with solid lines and any second floor overhangs /projections with dashed lines, including dimensions to the building, the building dimensions (and individual units), and the dimensions of any second floor overhangs /projections. 9. It appears on the civil site plan Sheet 1 of 4 that the width of the driveways is 15 feet; however, pavement shading obscures the dimension. Revise. 10 . Revise the land use data table on Sheet 1 of 4 for the proposed rear setback (indicated is 23.8 feet, but dimensioned is 10 feet). 11 . Provide floor plans for each floor the units (if one floor plan is applicable to more than one unit, note such). Only the first floor of the units was submitted with the application. 12 . Site plan appears to indicate a 15 -foot wide driveway, which is insufficient for two cars to park in. Building elevations indicate a single -wide garage door. The land use data table indicates two parking spaces per unit. Unit depth does not appear to provide for two cars in the garage. Make it clear of the location of provided parking. 13 . Provide the scale of the building elevation drawings on Sheet A -1. 14. Depict by shading or crosshatching all required paved vehicular use area interior landscaped areas. Additionally, include in the site data table the square footage of pavement, the square footage of interior landscaped area and the percentage of the interior landscaped area in relation to the paved vehicular use area. 15 . Indicate on the site plan the location of air condensing units. If located on the roof, note such on the plans. 16. Address site outdoor lighting. 17. Provide in the site data table the number of existing dwelling units or overnight accommodation units. 18. The building height has beenlindicated to be 39.25 feet to the roof deck. Provide the height of the elevator and stair room projections above the roof deck to their highest point of their roof. Additionally, provide the height of the parapet from the roof deck. Unclear what the structure is for the center unit above the roof deck (outline the proposed use of this structure). Unless this is for elevator or stairs, staff does not support this building projection. 19. Submit a reduced landscape plan for CDB presentation purposes (8.5 "xl 1 20. It is unclear based on the building elevations of how or where the building facade undulates based on the planes of the facade. Side elevations do not help with understanding the ins and outs of the front or rear elevations. Suggest a perspective drawing or building sections to explain the building facade undulation. 21 . Bay windows on the north and south elevations are incomplete on Sheet A -1. 22. Bay windows shown on the north and south elevations do not match depictions on the east or west elevations. Some show an angled wall under the window but some show a 90- degree projection of the floor joists. Revise /coordinate. 23 . Arched window on top floor in the center unit on the east elevation is drawn twice as a shadow. Revise. 24. Quarter -moon windows on west elevation for two units on either end of the building don't coincide with any other windows planned for building and appear out of place. Revise. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 28 25 . Garage door locations on west building elevations, the driveway locations on 8.5 "x11" site plan submitted by the architect and driveway locations on civil and landscape plans do not match. Coordinate building elevations, site and landscape plans relating to garage doors and driveway locations. 26. East building elevation indicates sliding or french doors on the rear of each unit on the ground floor. Site plan does not indicate any requried stoops for these doors. Revise site plan Sheet 1 of 4. Also, these stoops will encroach into the common area indicated on Preliminary Plat. 27. West elevation appears to indicate planters on the ground floor and on the thrid floor. These planters on the ground floor are not indicated on the site plan. Unclear how planters on the third floor will be maintained. Revise all appropriate drawings. 28 . West building elevation - Northern unit indicates a scored stucco joint/joist above the garage. This scored stucco joint/joist is not repeated on all other units. Southern unit does not indicate the column on the south end of the garage. Revise. 29. Trees indicated on the west building elevation are not proposed trees (per landscape plan). Remove. 30. Rear (east) elevation is very plain, with large expanses of wall. Break up with banding or other measures. 31 . North and south building elevations do not match as to windows. Unclear why bay windows on different floors are situated in proposed locations. Floor plans may help with understanding these window locations. 32 . West elevation - a window appears to be drawn for the center unit (#4) on the "ground" floor, but appears unfinished. Revise. 33 . Windows under the columned pediment on the west elevation for the northern units are different than the southern units. Revise. 34. Condtion to be included in staff report: That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s) -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work. 35 . Revise written submittal narrative to address responses to each of the General Applicability criteria and the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria. Do not be general; be specific in how the proposal meets each of the criteria: a. include in the responses specific information, such as how the proposed townhomes are in scale with the bulk and height of surrounding buildings (provide the heights *of surrounding buildings); b. in the second paragraph, provide the proposed height of the townhomes; c. unclear in second paragraph, fourth sentence, what is meant by "and greater setbacks "; d. front elevation appears to indicate concrete ballusters, whereas the last sentence in paragraph five indicates "all railings will be black or mill finish aluminum "; e. in the sixth paragraph, it indicates a "newly constructed" building. Unclear what building you are referring to. If you are referring to the proposed building, you indicate the building is two living floors over ground level parking, yet your drawings indicate three levels of living above ground level parking; f. indicate how the proposed reduction in the side and rear setbacks results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; g. reference to the current use as a motel in paragraph eight is inconsistent with the characterization of the change in occupancy from apartments in paragraph nine; h. unclear as to what prior townhome projects are referenced at the end of paragraph 10; i. in paragraph 13, reference is made to two parcels. According to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, there is only one parcel made up of two lots. j. under Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria, paragraph three, unclear what docks you are referring to; k. under Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria, paragraph four, unclear why you are commenting on a fire hydrant at a dock, since this property is not on the water; 1. under Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria, paragraph five, unclear as to reference to the garages having two cars, since the drawings appear to propose one -car garages, and the driveway length does not match the site plan. 36 . On the Preliminary Plat, provide the lot area for each of the seven lots. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 29 37 . Provide a point -by -point narrative as to how this project complies with the Beach By Design Design Guidelines (narrative to include "Old Florida District" and Design Guidelines, starting on page 56). 38 . Condition to be included in staff report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 39. Condition to be included in staff report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permit; 40. Include in the narrative how the increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 41 . Based on the small site plan submitted by the architect with a front setback shown of 13 feet, include in the narrative how the reduction to the front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life, and how it results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance (why can't the required setback be met ?). 42 . In the narrative include how the reduction to the side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance (why can't required setbacks be met ?). Other: No Comments Notes: This application is insufficient for the CDB. Submit revised plans and application package by noon on 6/30/04 for review by DRC on 8/12/04. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 30 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4576 May 10, 2004 Patti the Architect, Inc. 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, FL 34698 Re: FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004, 605 Poinsettia Avenue Dear Ms. Stough: The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right -of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, and Preliminary Plat approval for seven townhome lots, at 605 Poinsettia Avenue. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on June 10, 2004, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins at 562 -4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or a representative must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v /depts /planning. *Make us your favorite! Sincerely, Wayne lei. Wells, AICP Planner III IIMS56PDSIPIanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEAIPending cases)Up for the next DRCIPoinsettia 605 Poinsettia Place (T)IPoinsettia 605 Complete Letter 5.10.04.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR - COMMISSIONER Hm7 HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR - COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAI. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMA "I'IVE ACTION EMPLOYER" LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4576 April 29, 2004 Patti the Architect, Inc. 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, FL 34698 RE: Case No. FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004, 605 Poinsettia Avenue Dear Ms. Stough: The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval for property generally located at 605 Poinsettia Avenue. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete. Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. In order to stay on the current schedule for review for sufficiency by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on June 10, 2004, the following information is required to be submitted by 4:00 pm on May 7, 2004 (should you be unable to meet this time frame, the next submittal deadline is May 26, 2004 [noon] to be reviewed for sufficiency by the DRC on July 8, 2004, if the application is deemed complete): The following items and/or information are required in order to make vour application complete: 1. Provide floor plans for the units (if one floor plan is applicable to more than one unit, note such) (submit one original and 14 copies). 2. Provide stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality, signed by the civil engineer (submit three copies). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727 -562 -4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, W ells Wayne . , AICP Planner III WS56PDSIPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEAIIncompleteftinsettia 605 Poinsettia Place (7)IPoinsettia 605 Incomplete Letter 4.29.04.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOY1' HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR - COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER BII.1. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVI? ACTION EMPLOYER" CDB Meeting Date: January 18, 2005 ORIGINAL Case Numbers: FLD2004- 04029 /PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 Agenda Item: E1 Owner /Applicant: Florence Enterprises, LLC Representative: Ms. Patricia Stough, Patti the Architect, Inc. Address: 605 Poinsettia Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit eight attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 11.3 feet (to building), reductions to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 8.52 feet (to the northeast corner of the ground floor of the building), from 20 feet to 5.52 feet (to ground floor stoop) and from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to second through fourth floor balconies), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 37 feet (to roof deck) with an additional four feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 12.67 feet for a roof top pavilion (from roof deck) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right -of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, (2) Transfer of Development Rights for one dwelling unit from 200 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4 -1403 (TDR2004- 08009) and (3) Preliminary Plat approval for eight townhome lots (PLT2004- 00004): EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District; Resort Facilities High (RFH) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.26 acres; 11,375 square feet PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached dwellings (three units) Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (eight units — townhomes) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Tourist District; Overnight accommodations LAND USES: East: Tourist District; Overnight accommodations South: Institutional District; Church West: Open Space/Recreation District; City Park Staff Report — Community Development Board — January 18, 2005 Cases FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 — Page 1 of 8 CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Attached dwellings and overnight accommodation uses dominate the surrounding area east of Mandalay Avenue between Bay Esplanade and Somerset Street. A church is to the south and a City park is to the west of the subject property. Site Location and Existing Conditions: The irregularly shaped site is 0.26 acres located on the east side of Poinsettia Avenue, approximately 300 feet north of Bay Esplanade (north of Clearwater Beach Recreation Complex). The site is located within the Old Florida District of Beach By Design, which has been designated for multi - family townhomes and condominiums of low to mid -rise building heights. The immediate vicinity is almost entirely composed of attached dwellings and small motels of one to two - story. Building styles generally resemble architecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progressively expanded. The site is currently developed with a one -story residential building of three units. The site has 174.65 feet of frontage along Poinsettia Avenue. The irregularity of the site is due to having 59.77 feet of depth on the north side, while having 70.84 feet of depth on the south side, producing a triangulation on the rear portion of the site. A church is located to the south. A City park is located to the west across Poinsettia Avenue. Overnight accommodation uses abut to the north and east, and otherwise dominate the surrounding area. All existing site improvements will be removed as part of the site's redevelopment. Proposal: The proposal includes constructing an eight -unit, three -story (over ground -level garage parking) residential building of townhomes. The property is proposed to be subdivided to allow each unit to be sold fee simple. A total of seven dwelling units are permitted for the subject property, based on the maximum of 30 units per acre. The applicant is proposing the utilization of one dwelling unit through the Transfer of Development Rights from 200 Brightwater Drive (which is the maximum of 20 percent of the maximum number of dwelling units allowed by Section 4- 1402 of the Code). The site's irregular shape and shallowness of depth produces design challenges. The southern four units are approximately 2.5 feet deeper than the northern four units, due to the rear triangulation of the site. The southern four units will be 2,379 square feet of air - conditioned floor area, while the northern four units will be 2,227 square feet of air - conditioned floor area. Each unit will allow for one garage parking space, as well as one parking space in the driveway. The proposal includes a reduction to the front setback from 15 feet to 11.3 feet (to building). The front of the building will be set back 19.5 feet on the ground level to provide adequate distance for the off - street parking of vehicles, without extending into the proposed public sidewalk. Balconies on the front and rear of the building will provide visual interest to the building. The proposal includes a reduction to the rear setback from 20 feet to 8.52 feet (to the northeast corner of the ground floor of the building), from 20 feet to 5.52 feet (to ground floor stoop) and from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to second through fourth floor balconies). Due to the shallowness of the lot depth and Staff Report — Community Development Board — January 18, 2005 Cases FLD2004- 04029 /PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 — Page 2 of 8 the triangulation of the rear lot line, the depth of the northern four units is approximately 36.5 feet on the ground level, whereas the southern units are approximately 39 feet deep. Given this site's irregularity, the reductions to the front and rear setbacks are acceptable. The proposal does not include any reduction of the required side setback of 10 feet. The proposed Mediterranean architecture will complement the design of the church to the south. The pink hibiscus wall color, coupled with the buttercup blend of barrel tile roof, is consistent with the color palate under Beach by Design. The trim, fascia and railings will be white. Bay windows on the north and south sides of the building will provide visual interest to those elevations. The proposal includes the ability for parking to back into the right -of -way, which is not allowed by Code except for detached dwellings. Townhomes function much like detached dwellings and the Community Development Board has approved other townhome projects on local roadways on a case -by -case basis. This site's locational characteristics are acceptable for this parking arrangement. The proposal includes a minimal increase to building height from 35 feet to 37 feet (to roof deck), with an additional four feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 12.67 feet for a roof top pavilion (from roof deck). The proposed building of three stories over ground level parking is consistent with that envisioned by Beach by Design for this area. Code provisions allow parapet walls to extend a maximum of 30- inches above the roof deck. The applicant is requesting to increase the parapet to a total of four feet from the roof deck. The roof is usable outdoor space for each unit. This parapet will screen from view rooftop air condensing units and will be in proportion with the building fagade. The proposal also includes an open pavilion for the center two units on the front of the building that will be 12.67 feet in height (from roof deck to peak of the pavilion roof) for architectural embellishment and to provide visual relief. Code provisions allow, and the proposal includes, elevator towers and stair towers to be a maximum of 16 feet above the roof deck. The proposed stair /elevator towers will be equal in height to the proposed rooftop pavilion. The landscape plan utilizes a groundcover (aztec grass and giant liriope), shrubs (nora grant ixora, Indian hawthorne, podocarpus and sweet viburnum) and trees (cabbage palm, queen palm, lady palm and dahoon holly). The applicant is not proposing any signs with this development. Individual black barrels for trash collection will be stored within the individual garages when not placed at the street on collection days. A retention pond is proposed on the rear and south sides of the site. A 12 -foot radius for the 12 -inch DBH oak tree to the rear of the lot needs to be shown on all plans, prior to the issuance of any permits, for its effect on site improvements. All required Parks and Recreation fees will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. On -site utility facilities (electric and communication lines) will be required to be placed underground as part of the site redevelopment. Provisions for the placement of conduits for the future undergrounding of existing aboveground utility facilities in the public right -of -way should be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy in a manner acceptable to the utility companies and the City. Staff Report — Community Development Board — January 18, 2005 Cases FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 — Page 3 of 8 A special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 200 Brightwater Drive and being transferred to this site, is required to be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. This special warranty deed also must contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of 200 Brightwater Drive due to the transfer of development rights. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: Sections 2 -801.1 and 2-803): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 8 dwelling units (a) X* DENSITY (30 dwelling units per acre) (7 dwelling units maximum IMPERVIOUS 0.63 X SURFACE RATIO ISR 0.95 maximum LOT AREA (5,000 - 0.26 acres; 11,375 square feet X 10,000 sq. feet minimum) LOT WIDTH (50 - 174.65 feet X 100 feet minimum FRONT SETBACK 11.3 feet (to building) X* 0 -15 feet REAR SETBACK 8.52 feet (to the northeast corner of the X* (10 -20 feet) ground floor of the building); 5.52 feet (to ground floor stoop); 8.02 feet (to second through fourth floor balconies) SIDE SETBACK North: 10.03 feet (to building) X 0 -10 feet South: 11.96 feet to building) HEIGHT (35 -100 feet 37 feet (to roof deck) with an X* maximum) additional four feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 12.67 feet for a roof top avilion from roof deck) PARKING SPACES Two spaces per unit X (1.5 spaces per unit (a) Includes the Transfer of Development Rights for one unit (TDR2004- 08009). *See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report — Community Development Board — January 18, 2005 Cases FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 — Page 4 of 8 COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2- 803.C): Staff Report — Community Development Board — January 18, 2005 Cases FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 — Page 5 of 8 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of X uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off - street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on- street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Report — Community Development Board — January 18, 2005 Cases FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 — Page 5 of 8 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3 -913): COMPLIANCE WITH TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS STANDARDS (Section 4- 1403): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. COMPLIANCE WITH TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS STANDARDS (Section 4- 1403): SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on June 10, 2004, and September 9, 2004. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Flexible Development application to permit eight attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 11.3 feet (to building), reductions to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 8.52 feet (to the northeast corner of the ground floor of the building), from 20 feet to 5.52 feet (to ground floor stoop) and from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to second through fourth floor balconies), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 37 feet (to roof deck) with an additional four feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 12.67 feet for a roof top pavilion (from roof deck) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right - of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- Staff Report — Community Development Board — January 18, 2005 Cases FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 — Page 6 of 8 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not X reduce the fair market value of abutting property. 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of X Clearwater. 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with X adjacent land uses. 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will X upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which X enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on June 10, 2004, and September 9, 2004. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Flexible Development application to permit eight attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 11.3 feet (to building), reductions to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 8.52 feet (to the northeast corner of the ground floor of the building), from 20 feet to 5.52 feet (to ground floor stoop) and from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to second through fourth floor balconies), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 37 feet (to roof deck) with an additional four feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 12.67 feet for a roof top pavilion (from roof deck) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right - of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- Staff Report — Community Development Board — January 18, 2005 Cases FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 — Page 6 of 8 803.C, (2) Transfer of Development Rights for one dwelling unit from 200 Brightwater Drive, under the_ provisions of Section 4 -1403 (TDR2004- 08009) and (3) Preliminary Plat approval for eight townhome lots (PLT2004- 00004), for the site at 605 Poinsettia Avenue, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 803.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3 -913; 3. The proposal is in compliance with Beach by Design; and 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 200 Brightwater Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 200 Brightwater Drive due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (200 Bright - water Drive) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That either a subdivision plat or a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That all plans indicate a 12 -foot radius canopy for the 12 -inch DBH oak tree to the rear of the property prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abut- ting right(s) -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the is- suance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's en- gineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 6. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; and 7. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff. 4)4t44fS_ . M, IqvL Wayne . Wells, AI P, Planner III Staff Report — Community Development Board — January 18, 2005 Cases FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 — Page 7 of 8 ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S :• Planning DeparimentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBWoinsettia 605 Poinsettia Place (T) 1.18.05 CDB - WWIPoinsettia 605 Staff Report. doc Staff Report — Community Development Board — January 18, 2005 Cases FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 — Page 8 of 8 go IULARELM g O IOPL.INO d Q i { � NtA E, o Q`o oil VER ENA e mqm ST ENV' 4.J 0O 4a IR � ASTER PROJECT "�'" S< o SITE CAPBRIA Win 0 IDLEWILD Pp5 ROYAL WAY FELL SAY N AVALON 0 j 8 �C SAY �� '" � AWN' RoouwAr �Artla 5N PP1�' EAYMONT ST ftFF ff � WCAH BV PDtM a n £ o �` PAPAYA ST jB7Q � PASSAGE ` $ 8 Pale° O m.a WINDWARD eR Location Map FLD2004 -04029 Owner. Florence Enterprises, LLC Case: PLT2004 -00004 TDR2004 -08009 Site: 605 Poinsettia Avenue Property Size(Acres) : 0.26 PIN: 05/29/15/54810 /000 /0110 Atlas Page: 258A 0 0 1 11,i4rL►,�:.1 ^ . , ?fir•- , `� ,d 0 AL i VA Y r r �7A 'L0 MIR lJ R F r_ r� rAM L'E'I' 1 N - T" ♦ � s,..,�;.._.,_ ....✓ `z- ,.:...�. � :mow .r a �Y Aerial Map FLD2004 -04029 Owner: F1(= ren :�e Enterprises, LLC Case: PLT2004 -00004 TDR2004 -08009 Site: 6 )5 Foinsettia Aver ue Property 0.26 Size {Acres} : PIN: 05/29/15/54810/000 /0110 I Atlas Page: 258A 401 643 1 I I = It r [� V r I I 1 I I, 401 I — GLENDALE T HR --, I T _ 629 r I I I J ly r� I 1 3a 6p4 pp�� b II b l Iro I I n\ —I r-6221 i ,_ 16 201 1 III 1 r J / 618 6r� J L tl 4 f� 1 �63.7��,.�•,. r ''JV4._.a`�'i 612 JI jrJ II �D N ip`7 ry- 6 j2 I, � t r- Ll 1 0 - T OSIR - 617 h '11-:, 4A q a N I 'I 1 , 6Q5 -1 1 T _.r -- ; ' - Y 6i,1y I I =J J 3 1 L_� 1— X366 604 6�'( 605 I N Il zN�l N I N I M I r 58� 1 J 1 1 584 rJ— 1—I L99 ,,.J KENDALL ST -- ' H .-� h N `7 cV �, —, , i^y I 581 1 1 F11 1 579 -- LL Ji57M ' J I I I I l 327 1 'I � I rf 5' 1— 1 580 5711 rt 1 1 I 16b 1 11 5711 rl 1 1T\ 531 � b 0S A? 1 \ �i GLENDALE ST -' A&clhed i l -r in s 1 ' l I r' b Q AVALON ST h Q f 2� x 68 Parking iA a n t Lqt ' l � a AVALON ST AWWALL 5 City Park 532 Q ROYAL WAY City Park 605 JUANITA WA) 531 60 IU h Q II0�e ig x , m L acio n t _ 16 BY6 L ' l � L Li IS - _58� � b IL I zN�i _ I N I h I AWWALL 5 City Park 532 Q ROYAL WAY City Park 605 JUANITA WA) 531 60 IU Q II0�e ig x , m L acio n t _ 16 BY6 L ' l � L IS - _58� D I I , Place Of Worsfijp City Park _f I l�0 617 B r 1 I V3 6 t $84 M �I r D 58� D -- D - --I m T Existing Surrounding Uses Map - - - - -, rJ I ' l `{ I FLD2004 -04029 Owner: Florence Enterprises, LLC Case: PLT2004 -00004 TDR2004 -08009 Site: 605 Poinsettia Avenue Property 0.26 Size(Acres): PIN: 05/29/15/54810/000 /0110 Atlas Page: 258A 0 0 l View looking southeast at subject property View of church to south of subject property View looking northeast at subject property View of City Park to west of subject property 605 Poinsettia Avenue FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 Page 1 of 2 0 0 View of property north of subject property View of property to the east of subject property 605 Poinsettia Avenue View of property to the east of subject property View of newer attached dwellings at 645 Bay Esplanade to the northeas-. of subject property FLD2004- 04029/PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 Page 2 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 11:35 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Resubmitted plans for the January 18, 2005, CDB Engineering has completed review of FLD2004- 04029; 605 Poinsettia Ave, permit plan has been updated. Comments for staff report: Prior to building permit, the final plat to be recorded with Pinellas County. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) The site is required to make a payment in lieu of stormwater attenuation. 2) 2) provide a copy of an approved SWFWMD permit or provide a letter of exemption. 3) The 12" stormwater outfall pipe is to tie into the 15 "city storm pipe and not the existing 8" line as shown on the plans. Traffic Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to C.O. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727 - 562 -4781 scott.rice @MyClearwater.com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 7:26 AM To: Albee, Rick; Blackburn, Anne; Buysse, Beverly A.; Colbert, Joseph; Dittmer, Arden; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Tarapani, Cyndi; Gerlock, Chip; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Haines, Angel; Melone, Donald; Morris, William D.; Reynolds, Mike; Rice, Scott; Richter, Debbie; Schodtler, John; Watkins, Sherry Subject: Resubmitted plans for the January 18, 2005, CDB DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 18, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2004- 08061; 25191 US Highway 19; Dimmitt Cadillac 2. FLD2004- 04025; 521 S Gulfview Blvd; Entrada /Ramada 3. FLD2004- 04029; 605 Poinsettia Ave.; Park Place 4. FLD2004- 02010; 503 Marshall St.; 1504 Garden Inc. (Note: Two parking spaces have been added) I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, December 14, 2004. Thanks, Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Richter, Debbie Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 3:40 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Resubmitted plans for the January 18, 2005, CDB No change to P &R conditions. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 7:26 AM To: Albee, Rick; Blackburn, Anne; Buysse, Beverly A.; Colbert, Joseph; Dittmer, Arden; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Tarapani, Cyndi; Gerlock, Chip; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Haines, Angel; Melone, Donald; Morris, William D.; Reynolds, Mike; Rice, Scott; Richter, Debbie; Schodtler, John; Watkins, Sherry Subject: Resubmitted plans for the January 18, 2005, CDB DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 18, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2004- 08061; 25191 US Highway 19; Dimmitt Cadillac [Deb Richter] No comment 2. FLD2004- 04025;. 521 S Gulfview Blvd; Entrada /Ramada.[Deb Richter] OS /Rec fees still apply 3. FLD2004- 04029; 605 Poinsettia Ave.; Park Place [Deb Richter] $1,200 Recreation Fac fees still apply 4. FLD2004- 02010; 503 Marshall St.; 1504 Garden Inc. (Note: Two parking spaces have been added) [Deb Richter] No comment I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, December 14, 2004. Thanks, Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 11:28 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Resubmitted plans for the January 18, 2005, CDB 25191 US 19- Conditions met, revise PP 521 Gulfview- No Issues 605 Poinsettia- Condition 15 still not met, revised to be corrected prior to building permit, revised PP 503 Marshall- Modified conditions in PP - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 7:26 AM To: Albee, Rick; Blackburn, Anne; Buysse, Beverly A.; Colbert, Joseph; Dittmer, Arden; Dougall- Sides, Leslie; Tarapani, Cyndi; Gerlock, Chip; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Haines, Angel; Melone, Donald; Morris, William D.; Reynolds, Mike; Rice, Scott; Richter, Debbie; Schodtler, John; Watkins, Sherry Subject: Resubmitted plans for the January 18, 2005, CDB DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 18, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2004- 08061; 25191 US Highway 19; Dimmitt Cadillac 2. FLD2004- 04025; 521 S Gulfview Blvd; Entrada /Ramada 3. FLD2004- 04029; 605 Poinsettia Ave.; Park Place 4. FLD2004- 02010; 503 Marshall St.; 1504 Garden Inc. (Note: Two parking spaces have been added) I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments /conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met' or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, December 14, 2004. Thanks, Wayne Ml E- aZF E °u o o �M- z o Ctz g�oWa.,H £ �.$ur-'. m oa ° a Q z Wa Alp O< ¢ 2n °n oPL O�Ei.E 1' Ne II w 13 o O z 9 0 -z a # z o a z i" U o m 1aqq'' •- H z z o W z p f p w 3 ai32 m, N 41 Y Q J Wp VWj 2 `1•YQ�i� $�'sEom 8; o Z U ar 0> z z k a ^$JaYoa�m; Qy o W m v v+o a u N N ° �xa6� +Sono w O a c� �i I DIJ V� SEom 2586 A �qvl O O O a Q Q ON 0 a • r 0 �s s� �m a e+ st m n Y _ µ Y z r R c a $ �gr BA &rca; Pik'. I 63 �9 y ra ern 6� $ C`IfRI SL LA ' Dia gN L9 g 3r 0e e N b m w3nr � ru135n10d TV- 3 � Y 'm T m n ° a � $ $ 00 O m o m co a�mA FUU I I On N O \ < L O 1�1 00 2 CA NO V/ W� a Ln o N Q Zw Z LLr C ZtL O � O \ C-, NIn 1 0 N c 5 Iva o O tt 4 m L r. 3 • R „ � .M+� S 3AV .:. Ar7VONV11 a v Q > aaV1 p N m IL i/s � - =,I- 6uNp'WV L£70:60 ZOOZ /£Z /60'6mp•V8SZ \setae \pe:)o4ne \ui6ua \:s ' - AINUM 3nN3AV A AVIVON li ' . O m o m co a�mA FUU I I On N O \ < L O 1�1 00 2 CA NO V/ W� a Ln o N Q Zw Z LLr C ZtL O � O \ C-, NIn 1 0 N c 5 Iva o O tt 4 m L r. 3 • R „ � .M+� S 3AV .:. Ar7VONV11 a v Q > aaV1 p N m IL i/s � - =,I- 6uNp'WV L£70:60 ZOOZ /£Z /60'6mp•V8SZ \setae \pe:)o4ne \ui6ua \:s ' - $ 3 3nN3AV A AVIVON li ' m co a�mA FUU I I On N O \ < L O 1�1 00 2 CA NO V/ W� a Ln o N Q Zw Z LLr C ZtL O � O \ C-, NIn 1 0 N c 5 Iva o O tt 4 m L r. 3 • R „ � .M+� S 3AV .:. Ar7VONV11 a v Q > aaV1 p N m IL i/s � - =,I- 6uNp'WV L£70:60 ZOOZ /£Z /60'6mp•V8SZ \setae \pe:)o4ne \ui6ua \:s 0 N c 5 Iva o O tt 4 m L r. 3 • R „ � .M+� S 3AV .:. Ar7VONV11 a v Q > aaV1 p N m IL i/s � - =,I- 6uNp'WV L£70:60 ZOOZ /£Z /60'6mp•V8SZ \setae \pe:)o4ne \ui6ua \:s a v Q > aaV1 p N m IL i/s � - =,I- 6uNp'WV L£70:60 ZOOZ /£Z /60'6mp•V8SZ \setae \pe:)o4ne \ui6ua \:s 1:25, pm Case Number: FLD2004 -G4u29 -- 605 POINSETTIA AVE� Owner(s): Florence Enterprises 603 Indian Rocks Rd 0 + Belleair, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email V Applicant Florence Enterprises, Llc 256 President St Dunedin, F134698 TELEPHONE: 733 -3769, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email �� Representative: Patti The Architect Inc 1634 San Roy Dr Dunedin, F134698 _ TELEPHONE: 727 - 733 -3769, FAX: 727 - 733 -3769, E -MAIL: parch @gate.net Location: 0.26 acres located on the east side of Poinsettia Avenue, approximately 300 feet north of Bay Esplanade (north of Clearwater Beach Recreation Complex). Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit eight attached dwellings (townhomes) with reductions to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to xx feet (to building), reductions to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to the northeast corner of the ground floor of the building), from 20 feet to eight feet (to second through fourth floors of the building) and from 20 feet to 7.5 feet (to patios), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 37 feet (to roof deck) with an additional four feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and an additional 13.67 feet (from roof deck for a roof top pavillion), and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right -of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, (2) Transfer of Development Rights for one dwelling unit from 200 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4 -1403 (TDR2004- 08009) and (3) Preliminary Plat approval for eight townhome lots (PLT2004- 00004). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 827 Mandalay Ave TELEPHONE: 727 - 446 -5801, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: dmacnav @att.net Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727 - 725 -3345, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: Djw @gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner Attendees Included: City Staff: 6 /10 /04:Gerlock, Wells, Rice, Colbert; 9/9/04: Gerlock, Wells, Rice, Colbert Appl. /Rep.: 6/10/04: Patti Stough, Rob Parker, Wayne Phillips; 9/9/04: Patti Stough, Leo Governale Other: 6/10/04: David MacNamee; 9/9/04: Norma Carlough The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1) Proposed water meters should be installed within pervious areas. 2) Vehicle parking must be prohibited in the right -of -way. 3) Need to relocate mail box from edge of road to a safer location. 4) Need to show where guests park. 5) Need to show the F.D.C. connection and within 40 ft. of a F.H.A. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to a building permit. 1) Final plat recorded with Pinellas County. PLAT CONDITIONS (PLT2004- 00004): 1) Need to show scale. 2) Need to show a boundary description. 3) The word "subdivision" should be added after the word Mandalay in both the title and the description. 4) Stormwater ponds cannot be on a seperate tract. Tract "A" should be eliminated and the area incorporated into lots. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 33 Environmental: I . No Issues. Fire: 1 . Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire. Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 'h feet in front of and to the sides of appliance. As per Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2001 Edition, modification to Section 3 -5.6 of NFPA 1. Please acknowledge intent to comply. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT 2. Fire Sprinkler installation shall be in accordance with NFPA 13, 1999 Edition by a licensed Fire Sprinkler Contractor under separate permit with drawings. Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT 3 . CLOUD ALL REVISIONS 4. Show FDC at least 15 feet from the building and within 40 feet of a Fire Hydrant dedicated to Fire Sprinkler System. PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Plans submitted for Fire Review must reflect adherence to Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2001 Edition and the following Codes: NFPA 101, 2000 Edition, NFPA 70, 1999 Edition and Florida Statute 633. Show on a Code Reference Sheet. 6. Clearances of 7 '/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA 1, Sec.3 -5.6 Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT 7 . Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA 241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 8 . This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work.. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . Save the 13." Palm tree on the east property line near the NE corner. Revise all plans prior to CDB. 2. Show root pruning requirements at the 12" oak tree at the location that the cut in existing elevation occurs for the proposed retention pond under the canopy of this tree. Show prior to CDB. The 12" Palm between lots 2 & 3 is actually an Oak tree, revise plan and show the trees 12' radius canopy on ALL plans. Show prior to CDB. Save the 12" Palm tree on the south property line. Some plans show this tree to be saved and other show it to be removed. Revise TOB and and plans that show this tree to be removed prior to CDB. Landscaping: 1 . The use of oaks in such a tight area (to the east of building) is not recommended, try using a more upright tree form here. 2. 8/16/2004 (A D) still not met. 5/14/2004 (A_D) Per Section 3- 1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Per Section 3- 1202.B.1. Code requires trees to be 10' in height and 2 1/2" cal. at planting, ornamental trees can be 8' in height and 2" cal., and palms must be 10' clear and straight trunk at planting. "Palms do not indicate 10' clear trunk minimum.Make changes in Legend and submit revised page for review. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 34 Parks and Recreation: 1 . Site data table needs to include existing # units. Recreation Facilities impact fees of $200 for each new residential unit is due prior to building permit issuance or final plat, whichever occurs first. If 2 residential units are existing and 8 proposed, $1,200 will be due for 6 net new units. Contact Deb Richter at 562 -4817 if any questions. Stormwater: 1 . Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) The site is required to make a payment in lieu of stormwater attenuation. The proposed redevelopment comes under retrofit conditions where the developer obtains 1/2 credit for any existing impervious that is undergoing redevelopment. 2) provide a copy of an approved SWFWMD permit or provide a letter of exemption. 3) The 12" stormwater outfall pipe is to tie into the 15 "city storm pipe and not the existing 8" line as shown on the plans. Solid Waste: 1 . It is indicated that "black barrels" will be used for trash service. Where will they be stored? If proposed to be stored in the garages, will there be sufficient area inside to store the black barrel? Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. As was noted previously, the sight triangles are shown incorrectly on civil sheets 1 and 2 of 4. - - -- The 20' x 20' sight distance triangle are to be measured from the property line and must be shown at all access entrances /driveways per (City of Clearwater's Land Development Code Book). Objects within the sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the pavement. With the redesign of the front of the proposed building, significant portions of the structure are located within the sight triangles. This situation must be resolved to provide for safety of pedestrians and motorists. 2. Vehicle outlines shown on the plans are not representative of an average vehicle length. Please revise. 3. The above to be addressed prior to CDB. Traffic Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to C.O. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 35 1 . 8/29/04 & 6/1/04 - WW Condition to be included in staff report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permit; 2. 8/29/04 & 6/1/04 - WW Condition to be included in staff report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 3 . 8/29/04 & 5/30/04 - WW Condtion to be included in staff report: That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s) -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work. 4. 8/29/04 & 5/30/04 - WW Show on the civil site plan the actual building footprint proposed with solid lines and any second floor overhangs /projections with dashed lines, including dimensions to the building, the building dimensions (and individual units), and the dimensions of any second floor overhangs /projections. Include the width of units (if all equal, state "typical "). 5 . 8/29/04 & 5/30/04 - WW Remove existing site improvements from Sheets 1 and 2 of 4 of the civil site plan set, as this information is inconsequential and only makes the drawing confusing. Alternately, provide a separate demolition plan. 6. 8/29/04 & 5/30/04 - WW Sight triangles on the site plan are not drawn correctly (shown correctly on landscape plans). Sight triangles are 20'x20', measured along the property line and the each side of the edge of the driveways. Building is located within the visibility triangles. Need to request such as part of the application and provide justification for such encroachment, to the satisfaction of the Traffic Engineering Department. 7. 8/29/04 & 5/30/04 - WW On the Preliminary Plat, provide the lot area for each of the eight lots. 8 . 8/29/04 & 6/l/04 - WW Provide a point -by -point narrative as to how this project complies with the Beach By Design Design Guidelines (narrative to include "Old Florida District" and Design Guidelines, starting on page 56). 9. 8/29/04 - WW Provide in the site data table on Sheet 1/4 that there are three overnight accommodation units existing. 5/30/04 - WW Provide in the site data table the number of existing dwelling units or overnight accommodation units. 10. Stairs on floor plans don't work. 11 . Revise Sheets 1/4 and 2/4 to remove the balconies shown on the rear of the building units, as they don't exist per the building floor plans and elevations. 12 . Unclear of the location of certain building elements. Provide a cross - section drawing thru Units 1 and 3 (east to west) and thru building north to south. 13 . Land Use Data table on Sheet 1/4 too small. Enlarge to be able to read (legend verbiage larger than verbiage in data table). 14. Revise Sheet 1/4 to show the front structure (that has columns for Units 1,2, 7 & 8 and walls for Units 3 -6 with gable or shed roofs over these structures) and include the front setback dimension to the front part of the building structure (application says 10.66 feet). 15 . Revise Sheet C -1 for building height to indicate the height of the elevator /stair enclosure from roof deck to the top of the roof and to indicate the height of the covered roof seating area for Units 4 & 5 from the roof deck to the top of the roof. 16. Revise the application requests (1) to include the rear setback from the property line to the second thru fourth floors structure, (2) revise the rear setback request in the northeast and southeast from "pavement" to "stoops" and (3) to include the height of the covered roof seating areas for Units 4 & 5 from the roof deck to the top of the roof. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 36 17 . Revise Sheet C -1 ro indicate the depth of the bay windows (from the edge of the main structure to the edge of the bay window) on the front or rear elevations. 18. Revise Sheet C -1 for the rear elevation to indicate the open arched seating areas in the middle of the building for Units 4 & 5. 19 . Sheet A -1 - Unclear of the "black mass" in the corner of the master bathroom on the 4th floor. Advise /revise. 20 . Sheet C -1 - Unclear on side elevations (north and south) as to location of front edge of building (quoins) in relation to bay windows in bedroom #2 and for master bedroom. These windows also don't seem to line up on the floor plans (Sheet A -1) when projected onto the side building elevations. 21 . Unclear why the garage floor elevation must be over two feet above existing ground elevations and the effect of this elevation on the proposed right -of -way elevations (versus existing elevations). 22 . Revise Comprehensive Infill criteria #1 response. There is no rounding up of density. The maximum permitted density for this site is seven units (not 7.8 du/acre). The applicant is requesting a TDR of one unit. 23 . Revise Comprehensive Infill criteria #10 response. Unclear whether the architecture is "tropical" or "Mediterranean" style, as both are stated. 24. In the narrative include how the reduction to the front and rear setback and the increased height results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. Also, elaborate as to how the reduction to the front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life (since there is only entry and garage doors on the ground floor). 25 . Revise Sheet 1/4 to also indicate the rear setback to the second thm fourth floors (ground floor is 10.24 to NE building corner). Also include the setback from the rear property line to the stoops. 26. Indicate on Sheet C -1 the proposed colors of building banding, quoins, banding around windows, columns, facia, ornamentation above windows, etc. 27 . Preliminary Plat - Why does the rear property line of individual units parallel the rear property line of the overall property and not follow the outline of the units. Also, the stoops need to be taken into account with the individual unit areas, as some (on north side) will encroach into the common area indicated on Preliminary Plat. 28 . Unit floor plans have only been provided for Unit 8 (which is the same as Unit 7, minus the bay windows). Provide unit floor plans for Unit 1 or 2, 3 or 4 and 5 or 6. (Trying to understand the undulation of the building.) 29. Based on the perspective drawing submitted, unclear why the front wall in front of the garage doors for Units 4 & 5 is where it is proposed (supposedly at a front setback of 10.66 feet). Floor plans don't indicate any such outdoor deck over open, unenclosed area. Provide full justification, in light of encroachment into visibility triangles. 30 . While the Zoning Code provides for setbacks and certain "flexibility" for setbacks, the Building Code also has "setbacks," but relating to the materials and allowable openings of the structure in relation to the property line. The northeast corner of the building is proposed at approximately eight feet. Such a proposed setback may restrict the materials and allowable openings for all portions of the building less than eight feet from the property line. Advise as to whether Building Code provisions will alter the building as proposed, especially in light of openings. If revisions are necessary to also meet Building Code provisions, revise all necessary plans to reflect such. 31 . Provide the proposed front and rear setback to all corners of the proposed building where the building /units change direction (non - linear; undulate) to ensure setback requirements are being met. 32 . While the request includes a modest increase to building height, staff is concerned with the scale and mass of the building. This concern includes the proposed reductions to the front setback and rear setback. The front of the building does provide for some undulation of the facade, but the rear is a fairly massive "wall." The rear setback reductions are significant, in light of the building massing. Contributing factors to these concerns may include, but may not be limited to, the size of the units (over 3,000 square feet per unit) and the request to transfer development rights of one dwelling unit to this site. Potential solutions to the massing issue could include the reduction of units proposed for this site, the reduction of the height of some of the units (potentially reduce the two or four end units to two floors over ground level garage), undulating the heights of the units in the lenght of the building, designing the units to be placed on a diagonal, much like was designed at 656 Bayway Boulevard, and/or the staggering of units, much like was designed at 130 and 145 Brightwater Drive. Given these concerns, staff cannot support the setback reductions to the front and rear as requested. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 37 Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 10/19/04 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 9/16/04. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 38 Y. 1:25 pm" Case Number: FLD2004 -04u29 -- 605 POINSETTIA AVE Owner(s): Florence Enterprises 603 Indian Rocks Rd Belleair, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Florence Enterprises, Llc 256 President St Dunedin, F134698 TELEPHONE: 733 -3769, Representative: Patti The Architect Inc FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email PM4 9.9. n♦ 1)VJW cvv404A 1634 San Roy Dr Dunedin, F134698 TELEPHONE: 727 - 733 -3769, FAX: 727 - 733 -3769, E -MAIL: parch @gate.net Location: 0.26 acres located on the east side of Poinsettia Avenue, approximately 300 feet north of Bay Esplanade (north of Clearwater Beach Recreation Complex). Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit eight attached dwellings (townhomes) with reductions to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to xx feet (to building), reductions to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to the northeast corner of the ground floor of the building), from 20 feet to eight feet (to second through fourth floors of the building) and from 20 feet to 7.5 feet (to patios), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 37 feet (to roof deck) with an additional four feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and an additional 13.67 feet (from roof deck for a roof top pavillion), and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right -of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, (2) Transfer of Development Rights for one dwelling unit from 200 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4 -1403 (TDR2004- 08009) and (3) Preliminary Plat approval for eight townhome lots (PLT2004- 00004). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 827 Mandalay Ave TELEPHONE: 727 - 446 -5801, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: dmacnav @att.net Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727 - 725 -3345, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: Djw @gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner Attendees Included: City Staff: 6 /10 /04:Gerlock, Wells, Rice, Colbert; 9/9/04: Gerlock, Wells, Rice, Colbert Appl./Rep.: 6/10/04: Patti Stough, Rob Parker, Wayne Phillips; 9/9/04: Other: 6/10/04: David MacNamee The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1) Proposed water meters should be installed within pervious areas. 2) Vehicle parking must be prohibited in the right -of -way. 3) Need to relocate mail box from edge of road to a safer location. 4) Need to show where guests park. 5) Need to show the F.D.C. connection and within 40 ft. of a F.H.A. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to a building permit. 1) Final plat recorded with Pinellas County. PLAT CONDITIONS (PLT2004- 00004): 1) Need to show scale. 2) Need to show a boundary description. 3) The word "subdivision" should be added after the word Mandalay in both the title and the description. 4) Stormwater ponds cannot be on a seperate tract. Tract "A" should be eliminated and the area incorporated into lots. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 39 Environmental: No Issues. Fire: I . Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 'h feet in front of and to the sides of appliance. As per Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2001 Edition, modification to Section 3 -5.6 of NFPA 1. Please acknowledge intent to comply. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT 2 . Fire Sprinkler installation shall be in accordance with NFPA 13, 1999 Edition by a licensed Fire Sprinkler Contractor under separate permit with drawings. Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT 3 . CLOUD ALL REVISIONS 4. Show FDC at least 15 feet from the building and within 40 feet of a Fire Hydrant dedicated to Fire Sprinkler System. PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Plans submitted for Fire Review must reflect adherence to Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2001 Edition and the following Codes: NFPA 101, 2000 Edition, NFPA 70, 1999 Edition and Florida Statute 633. Show on a Code Reference Sheet. 6. Clearances of 7 %2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA 1, Sec.3 -5.6 Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT 7. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA 241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 8 . This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work.. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I , No issues. Land Resources: 1 . Save the 13" Palm tree on the east property line near the NE corner. Revise all plans prior to CDB. 2. Show root pruning requirements at the 12" oak tree at the location that the cut in existing elevation occurs for the proposed retention pond under the canopy of this tree. Show prior to CDB. 3 . The 12" Palm between lots 2 & 3 is actually an Oak tree, revise plan and show the trees 12' radius canopy on ALL plans. Show prior to CDB. 4. Save the 12" Palm tree on the south property line. Some plans show this tree to be saved and other show it to be removed. Revise TOB and and plans that show this tree to be removed prior to CDB. Landscaping: 1 . The use of oaks in such a tight area (to the east of building) is not recommended, try using a more upright tree form here. 2. 8/16/2004 (A D) still not met. 5/14/2004 (A D) Per Section 3- 1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Per Section 3- 1202.B.1. Code requires trees to be 10' in height and 2 1/2" cal. at planting, ornamental trees can be 8' in height and 2" cal., and palms must be 10' clear and straight trunk at planting. "Palms do not indicate 10' clear trunk minimum.Make changes in Legend and submit revised page for review. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 40 Parks and Recreation: 1 . Site data table needs to include existing # units. Recreation Facilities impact fees of $200 for each new residential unit is due prior to building permit issuance or final plat, whichever occurs first. If 2 residential units are existing and 8 proposed, $1,200 will be due for 6 net new units. Contact Deb Richter at 562 -4817 if any questions. Stormwater: 1 , Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) The site is required to make a payment in lieu of stormwater attenuation. The proposed redevelopment comes under retrofit conditions where the developer obtains 1/2 credit for any existing impervious that is undergoing redevelopment. 2) provide a copy of an approved SWFWMD permit or provide a letter of exemption. 3) The 12" stormwater outfall pipe is to tie into the 15 "city storm pipe and not the existing 8" line as shown on the plans. Solid Waste: 1 . It is indicated that "black barrels" will be used for trash service. Where will they be stored? If proposed to be stored in the garages, will there be sufficient area inside to store the black barrel? Traffic Engineering: 1 , 1. As was noted previously, the sight triangles are shown incorrectly on civil sheets 1 and 2 of 4. - - -- The 20'x 20' sight distance triangle are to be measured from the property line and must be shown at all access entrances /driveways per (City of Clearwater's Land Development Code Book). Objects within the sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the pavement. With the redesign of the front of the proposed building, significant portions of the structure are located within the sight triangles. This situation must be resolved to provide for safety of pedestrians and motorists. 2. Vehicle outlines shown on the plans are not representative of an average vehicle length. Please revise. 3. The above to be addressed prior to CDB. Traffic Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to C.O. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 41 1 . 8/29/04 & 6/1/04 - \VW Condition to be included in staff report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permit; 2 . 8/29/04 & 6/l/04 - WW Condition to be included in staff report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 3 . 8/29/04 & 5/30/04 - WW Condtion to be included in staff report: That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s) -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of.a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work. 4. 8/29/04 & 5/30/04 - WW Show on the civil site plan the actual building footprint proposed with solid lines and any second floor overhangs /projections with dashed lines, including dimensions to the building, the building dimensions (and individual units), and the dimensions of any second floor overhangs /projections. Include the width of units (if all equal, state "typical "). 5 . 8/29/04 & 5/30/04 - WW Remove existing site improvements from Sheets 1 and 2 of 4 of the civil site plan set, as this information is inconsequential and only makes the drawing confusing. Alternately, provide a separate demolition plan. 6. 8/29/04 & 5/30/04 - WW Sight triangles on the site plan are not drawn correctly (shown correctly on landscape plans). Sight triangles are 20'x20', measured along the property line and the each side of the edge of the driveways. Building is located within the visibility triangles. Need to request such as part of the application and provide justification for such encroachment, to the satisfaction of the Traffic Engineering Department. 7 . 8/29/04 & 5/30/04 - WW On the Preliminary Plat, provide the lot area for each of the eight lots. 8 . 8/29/04 & 6/l/04 - WW Provide a point -by -point narrative as to how this project complies with the Beach By Design Design Guidelines (narrative to include "Old Florida District" and Design Guidelines, starting on page 56). 9. 8/29/04 - WW Provide in the site data table on Sheet 1/4 that there are three overnight accommodation units existing. 5/30/04 - WW Provide in the site data table the number of existing dwelling units or overnight accommodation units. 10. Stairs on floor plans don't work. 11 . Revise Sheets 1/4 and 2/4 to remove the balconies shown on the rear of the building units, as they don't exist per the building floor plans and elevations. 12. Unclear of the location of certain building elements. Provide a cross - section drawing thru Units 1 and 3 (east to west) and thru building north to south. 13 . Land Use Data table on Sheet 1/4 too small. Enlarge to be able to read (legend verbiage larger than verbiage in data table). 14. Revise Sheet 1/4 to show the front structure (that has columns for Units 1,2, 7 & 8 and walls for Units 3 -6 with gable or shed roofs over these structures) and include the front setback dimension to the front part of the building structure (application says 10.66 feet). 15 . Revise Sheet C -1 for building height to indicate the height of the elevator /stair enclosure from roof deck to the top of the roof and to indicate the height of the covered roof seating area for Units 4 & 5 from the roof deck to the top of the roof. 16. Revise the application requests (1) to include the rear setback from the property line to the second thru fourth floors structure, (2) revise the rear setback request in the northeast and southeast from "pavement" to "stoops" and (3) to include the height of the covered roof seating areas for Units 4 & 5 from the roof deck to the top of the roof. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 42 17 . Revise Sheet C -1 to indicate the depth of the bay windows (from the edge of the main structure to the edge of the bay window) on the front or rear elevations. 18 . Revise Sheet C -1 for the rear elevation to indicate the open arched seating areas in the middle of the building for Units 4 & 5. 19. Sheet A -1 - Unclear of the "black mass" in the corner of the master bathroom on the 4th floor. Advise /revise. 20. Sheet C -1 - Unclear on side elevations (north and south) as to location of front edge of building (quoins) in relation to bay windows in bedroom #2 and for master bedroom. These windows also don't seem to line up on the floor plans (Sheet A -1) when projected onto the side building elevations. 21 . Unclear why the garage floor elevation must be over two feet above existing ground elevations and the effect of this elevation on the proposed right -of -way elevations (versus existing elevations). 22 . Revise Comprehensive Infill criteria #1 response. There is no rounding up of density. The maximum permitted density for this site is seven units (not 7.8 du/acre). The applicant is requesting a TDR of one unit. 23 . Revise Comprehensive Infill criteria #10 response. Unclear whether the architecture is "tropical" or "Mediterranean" style, as both are stated. 24 . In the narrative include how the reduction to the front and rear setback and the increased height results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. Also, elaborate as to how the reduction to the front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life (since there is only entry and garage doors on the ground floor). 25 . Revise Sheet 1/4 to also indicate the rear setback to the second thru fourth floors (ground floor is 10.24 to NE building corner). Also include the setback from the rear property line to the stoops. 26. Indicate on Sheet C -I the proposed colors of building banding, quoins, banding around windows, columns, facia, ornamentation above windows, etc. 27. Preliminary Plat - Why does the rear property line of individual units parallel the rear property line of the overall property and not follow the outline of the units. Also, the stoops need to be taken into account with the individual unit areas, as some (on north side) will encroach into the common area indicated on Preliminary Plat. 28 . Unit floor plans have only been provided for Unit 8 (which is the same as Unit 7, minus the bay windows). Provide unit floor plans for Unit 1 or 2, 3 or 4 and 5 or 6. (Trying to understand the undulation of the building.) 29. Based on the perspective drawing submitted, unclear why the front wall in front of the garage doors for Units 4 & 5 is where it is proposed (supposedly at a front setback of 10.66 feet). Floor plans don't indicate any such outdoor deck over open, unenclosed area. Provide full justification, in light of encroachment into visibility triangles. 30. While the Zoning Code provides for setbacks and certain "flexibility" for setbacks, the Building Code also has "setbacks," but relating to the materials and allowable openings of the structure in relation to the property line. The northeast corner of the building is proposed at approximately eight feet. Such a proposed setback may restrict the materials and allowable openings for all portions of the building less than eight feet from the property line. Advise as to whether Building Code provisions will alter the building as proposed, especially in light of openings. If revisions are necessary to also meet Building Code provisions, revise all necessary plans to reflect such. 31 . Provide the proposed front and rear setback to all corners of the proposed building where the building /units change direction (non - linear; undulate) to ensure setback requirements are being met. 32 . While the request includes a modest increase to building height, staff is concerned with the scale and mass of the building. This concern includes the proposed reductions to the front setback and rear setback. The front of the building does provide for some undulation of the facade, but the rear is a fairly massive "wall." The rear setback reductions are significant, in light of the building massing. Contributing factors to these concerns may include, but may not be limited to, the size of the units (over 3,000 square feet per unit) and the request to transfer development rights of one dwelling unit to this site. Potential solutions to the massing issue could include the reduction of units proposed for this site, the reduction of the height of some of the units (potentially reduce the two or four end units to two floors over ground level garage), undulating the heights of the units in the lenght of the building, designing the units to be placed on a diagonal, much like was designed at 656 Bayway Boulevard, and/or the staggering of units, much like was designed at 130 and 145 Brightwater Drive. Given these concerns, staff cannot support the setback reductions to the front and rear as requested. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 43 Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 10/19/04 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 9/16/04. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 9, 2004 - Page 44 F. i °.`i_ 1.30 pm Case Number: FLD2004 -04029 -- 605 POINSETTIA AVE Owner(s): Florence Enterprises 603 Indian Rocks Rd Belleair, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Florence Enterprises, Llc 256 President St Dunedin, Fl 34698 TELEPHONE: 733 -3769, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Patti The Architect Inc PC*\ 1634 San Roy Dr Dunedin, F134698 TELEPHONE: 727 - 733 -3769, FAX: 727 - 733 -3769, E -MAIL: parch @gate.net Location: 0.26 acres located on the east side of Poinsettia Avenue, approximately 300 feet north of Bay Esplanade (north of Clearwater Beach Recreation Complex). Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit seven attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to xx feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building and pavement), reductions to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to xx feet (to patios), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 39.25 feet (to roof deck) with an additional xx feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and an additional xx feet (from roof deck for a roof top pavillion), and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right -of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, and Preliminary Plat approval for seven townhome lots (PLT2004- 00004). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 827 Mandalay Ave TELEPHONE: 727 - 446 -5801, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: dmacnav @att.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner Attendees Included: City Staff: Chip Gerlock, Wayne Wells, Scott Rice, Joe Colbert Applicant/Representative: Patti Stough, Rob Parker, Wayne Phillips Other: David MacNamee The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 24 1 1) Need to install proposed sidewalk per City Standards (one -foot lrum property line), not as shown. 2) Need to install the sanitary sewer services within the grass areas between drives, not under the concrete driveways as shown. 3) Need to show the existing gas main along Poinsettia Avenue. 4) Need to show the fire line to the building for the fire sprinkler system. 5) Double detector check valve with bypass meter shall be required for any internal fire protection line. 6) Need to install a gate valve on both sides of proposed backflow device(s) if the fire line 4 -inch diameter or larger. 7) The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, set the water meter and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation cost. 8) Need two (2) fire hydrants installed to meet Fire Department requirements. All applicable fees to be paid for by the applicant. 9) Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device. 10) Lot lines per proposed plat must be shown on utility sheet. 11) Need to show where the mailboxes are going to be installed. 12) All planting within any easement will be installed at the property owner's risk. The City will not be responsible for any /all uprooted or damaged plants within easement(s) if the City needs to maintain/replace existing utility mains. 13) Where do visitors park? (Guests, service and delivery vehicles, etc.) Not shown on plans. 14) If applicable, need to show staging area. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1) Final plat recorded with Pinellas County. PLT2004 -00004 - ENGINEERING PLAT CONDITIONS: 1) Need boundary description of proposed plat on the plat. 2) "Plat Notations ", 3rd line, the word "however" is misspelled. Environmental: Fire: No issues. No Issues. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 25 Show FDC at least 15 feet from the building and within 40 feet of a rire Hydrant dedicated to Fire Sprinkler System. PRIOR TO CDB. Provide a fire hydrant on the same side of the street and within 300 feet of the most remote point of the building. PRIOR TO CDB. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA 241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Plans submitted for Fire Review must reflect adherence to Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2001 Edition and the following Codes: NFPA 101, 2000 Edition, NFPA 70, 1999 Edition and Florida Statute 633. Show on a Code Reference Sheet. Fire Sprinkler installation shall be in accordance with NFPA 13, 1999 Edition by a licensed Fire Sprinkler Contractor under separate permit with drawings. Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7'/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance. As per Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2001 Edition, modification to Section 3 -5.6 of NFPA 1. Please acknowledge intent to comply. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT Clearances of 7 '/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA 1, Sec.3 -5.6 Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT CLOUD ALL REVISIONS Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 No issues. Land Resources: 1 . The 12" Palm between lots 2 & 3is actually an Oak tree, revise plan and show the trees 12' radious canopy. Show prior to CDB. 2. Show root pruning requirements at the 12" oak tree if a cut in existing elevation is required under the canopy of this tree. Show prior to CDB. Landscaping: 1 , The site and archetectural plans do not match...? If the plans are overlayed the landscape is in the driveways and entry areas of the dwellings.. revise plans to match. 2. Per Section 3- 1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Per Section 3- 1202.E.1. - 1 Tree /island minimum; 1 Tree /150 sq. ft. of required green space; Shrubs: 50% of required green space; and Groundcover shall be utilized for required green space in lieu of turf. If the plan that the architect is proposing is used for the site, adjust the driveways that have abutting drives redesigned to create space between them for landscaping. The garage doors are narrower than the drives and can be matched on at least one side to create a wider island than what is proposed on the plan submitted. If the engineers plan is to be used, revise the architectural to match and provide access to the front doors in the landscape plans. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Recreation Facilities impact fees of $200 for each new residential unit is due prior to building permit issuance or final plat, whichever occurs first. If 2 residential units are existing and 7 proposed, $1,000 will be due for 5 net new units. Contact Deb Richter at 562 -4817 if any questions. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 26 � f 1 . Prior to CDB: 1) The site is required to provide storm water attenuation and not just water quality. The proposed redevelopment comes under retrofit conditions where the developer obtains 1/2 credit for any existing impervious that is undergoing redevelopment. This site also qualifies for stormwater payment in lieu of retention if the developer wishes to apply. 2) Section A -A on Sheet 3 of 4 shows a TOB of 5.25 and pond bottom EL. of 4.5. The existing ground surface in this area is approximately EL. 4.3. On Section A -A, show grades required to build the pond as designed. This is of major concern as all the runoff will be directed to the rear of the site with a 3 inch deep swale to lead the overflow to the street. This design is not acceptable as the property to the east of this site could be flooded out in a severe storm event. The city will accept payment in lieu of retention only if the detention area is adjacent to the city street and it is suggested that one of the buildings be eliminated or all of the building footprints be reduced so as to create an area for detention along Poinsettia. Solid Waste: 1 . It is indicated that "black barrels" will be used for trash service. Where will they be stored? If proposed to be stored in the garages, will there be sufficient area inside to store the black barrel? Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. Demonstrate how two cars will fit in the enclosed garage. 2. Sight triangles are shown incorrectly on Sheets 1 and 2 of 4. The base of the triangles are to be along the property line as shown on Sheet L -1. 2. The above to be addressed prior to CDB. Traffic Impact Fee to be accessed and paid prior to C.O. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 27 I . The application lists the property owner as Wayne Phillips; however, the property Appraisers Office indicates the owner is Florence Enterprises. The deed recorded on February 27, 2003, also indicates Florence Enterprises as the owner. Revise the application. 2. The application lists the parcel size to be 11,550 square feet; however, the site plan indicates the parcel size to be 11,375 square feet. Revise either the application or the site plan to the correct parcel size. 3 . Complete the address for the agent on the application to include the city, state and zip code. 4. Complete the address for the applicant on the application to include the city, state and zip code. The applicant's email address is illegible. Revise. 5 . Sight triangles on the site plan and landscape plans are not drawn correctly. Sight triangles are 20'x20', measured along the property line and the each side of the edge of the driveways. 6. Remove existing site improvements from Sheets 1 and 2 of 4 of the civil site plan set, as this information is inconsequential and only makes the drawing confusing. Alternately, provide a separate demolition plan. 7. There is an inconsistency between the civil site plans prepared by Governale Engineering Services, Inc., the reduced 8.5'x11" site plans and the application. The civil site plans indicate the building to be set back 19.82 feet (Unit 1) from the front property line on the south side of the site and 19.86 feet (Unit 7) on the north side of the site. The reduced site plan and the application appear to indicate a different ground level building footprint and a front setback of 13 feet. Revise /coordinate. 8 . Show on the civil site plan the actual building footprint proposed with solid lines and any second floor overhangs /projections with dashed lines, including dimensions to the building, the building dimensions (and individual units), and the dimensions of any second floor overhangs /projections. 9. It appears on the civil site plan Sheet 1 of 4 that the width of the driveways is 15 feet; however, pavement shading obscures the dimension. Revise. 10. Revise the land use data table on Sheet 1 of 4 for the proposed rear setback (indicated is 23.8 feet, but dimensioned is 10 feet). 11 . Provide floor plans for each floor the units (if one floor plan is applicable to more than one unit, note such). Only the first floor of the units was submitted with the application. 12. Site plan appears to indicate a 15 -foot wide driveway, which is insufficient for two cars to park in. Building elevations indicate a single -wide garage door. The land use data table indicates two parking spaces per unit. Unit depth does not appear to provide for two cars in the garage. Make it clear of the location of provided parking. 13 . Provide the scale of the building elevation drawings on Sheet A -1. 14. Depict by shading or crosshatching all required paved vehicular use area interior landscaped areas. Additionally, include in the site data table the square footage of pavement, the square footage of interior landscaped area and the percentage of the interior landscaped area in relation to the paved vehicular use area. 15 . Indicate on the site plan the location of air condensing units. If located on the roof, note such on the plans. 16. Address site outdoor lighting. 17. Provide in the site data table the number of existing dwelling units or overnight accommodation units. 18 . The building height has been indicated to be 39.25 feet to the roof deck. Provide the height of the elevator and stair room projections above the roof deck to their highest point of their roof. Additionally, provide the height of the parapet from the roof deck. Unclear what the structure is for the center unit above the roof deck (outline the proposed use of this structure). Unless this is for elevator or stairs, staff does not support this building projection. 19 . Submit a reduced landscape plan for CDB presentation purposes (8.5 "x11 20. It is unclear based on the building elevations of how or where the building facade undulates based on the planes of the facade. Side elevations do not help with understanding the ins and outs of the front or rear elevations. Suggest a perspective drawing or building sections to explain the building facade undulation. 21 . Bay windows on the north and south elevations are incomplete on Sheet A -1. 22. Bay windows shown on the north and south elevations do not match depictions on the east or west elevations. Some show an angled wall under the window but some show a 90- degree projection of the floor joists. Revise /coordinate. 23 . Arched window on top floor in the center unit on the east elevation is drawn twice as a shadow. Revise. 24. Quarter -moon windows on west elevation for two units on either end of the building don't coincide with any other windows planned for building and appear out of place. Revise. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 28 25 . Garage door locations on west building elevations, the driveway locations on 8.5 "xl l" site plan submitted by the architect and driveway locations on civil and landscape plans do not match. Coordinate building elevations, site and landscape plans relating to garage doors and driveway locations. 26. East building elevation indicates sliding or french doors on the rear of each unit on the ground floor. Site plan does not indicate any requried stoops for these doors. Revise site plan Sheet 1 of 4. Also, these stoops will encroach into the common area indicated on Preliminary Plat. 27. West elevation appears to indicate planters on the ground floor and on the thrid floor. These planters on the ground floor are not indicated on the site plan. Unclear how planters on the third floor will be maintained. Revise all appropriate drawings. 28 . West building elevation - Northern unit indicates a scored stucco joint/joist above the garage. This scored stucco joint/joist is not repeated on all other units. Southern unit does not indicate the column on the south end of the garage. Revise. 29. Trees indicated on the west building elevation are not proposed trees (per landscape plan). Remove. 30. Rear (east) elevation is very plain, with large expanses of wall. Break up with banding or other measures. 31 . North and south building elevations do not match as to windows. Unclear why bay windows on different floors are situated in proposed locations. Floor plans may help with understanding these window locations. 32. West elevation - a window appears to be drawn for the center unit (#4) on the "ground" floor, but appears unfinished. Revise. 33 . Windows under the columned pediment on the west elevation for the northern units are different than the southern units. Revise. 34. Condtion to be included in staff report: That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s) -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work. 35 . Revise written submittal narrative to address responses to each of the General Applicability criteria and the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria. Do not be general; be specific in how the proposal meets each of the criteria: a. include in the responses specific information, such as how the proposed townhomes are in scale with the bulk and height of surrounding buildings (provide the heights of surrounding buildings); b. in the second paragraph, provide the proposed height of the townhomes; c. unclear in second paragraph, fourth sentence, what is meant by "and greater setbacks "; d. front elevation appears to indicate concrete ballusters, whereas the last sentence in paragraph five indicates "all railings will be black or mill finish aluminum "; e. in the sixth paragraph, it indicates a "newly constructed" building. Unclear what building you are referring to. If you are referring to the proposed building, you indicate the building is two living floors over ground level parking, yet your drawings indicate three levels of living above ground level parking; f, indicate how the proposed reduction in the side and rear setbacks results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; g. reference to the current use as a motel in paragraph eight is inconsistent with the characterization of the change in occupancy from apartments in paragraph nine; h. unclear as to what prior townhome projects are referenced at the end of paragraph 10; i. in paragraph 13, reference is made to two parcels. According to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, there is only one parcel made up of two lots. j. under Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria, paragraph three, unclear what docks you are referring to; k. under Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria, paragraph four, unclear why you are commenting on a fire hydrant at a dock, since this property is not on the water; 1. under Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria, paragraph five, unclear as to reference to the garages having two cars, since the drawings appear to propose one -car garages, and the driveway length does not match the site plan. 36 . On the Preliminary Plat, provide the lot area for each of the seven lots. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 29 37 . Provide a point -by -point narrative as to how this project complies Wan the Beach By Design Design Guidelines (narrative to include "Old Florida District" and Design Guidelines, starting on page 56). 38. Condition to be included in staff report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 39. Condition to be included in staff report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permit; 40. Include in the narrative how the increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 41 . Based on the small site plan submitted by the architect with a front setback shown of 13 feet, include in the narrative how the reduction to the front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life, and how it results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance (why can't the required setback be met ?). 42. In the narrative include how the reduction to the side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance (why can't required setbacks be met ?). Other: No Comments Notes: This application is insufficient for the CDB. Submit revised plans and application package by noon on 6/30/04 for review by DRC on 8/12/04. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 30 a Case Number: PLT2004 OvuU4 -- 605 POINSETTIA AVE Owner(s): Florence Enterprises 603 Indian Rocks Rd Belleair, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Wayne Phillips 256president St - Dunedin, Fl 34698 TELEPHONE: 734 -0006, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Patti The Architect Inc l� 1634 San Roy Dr Dunedin, Fl 34698 TELEPHONE: 727 - 733 -3769, FAX: 727 - 733 -3769, E -MAIL: parch @gate.net Location: 0.26 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POINSETTIA AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET NORTH OF BAY ESPLANADE (NORTH OF CLEARWATER BEACH RECREATION COMPLEX) Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Preliminary Plat for seven townhome lots (related to FLD2004- 04029) Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 827 Mandalay Ave TELEPHONE: 727 - 446 -5801, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: dmacnav @att.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner Attendees Included: CITY STAFF: CHIP GERLOCK, WAYNE WELLS, SCOTT RICE, JOE COLBERT APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: PATTI STOUGH, ROB PARKER, WAYNE PHILLIPS; OTHER: DAVID MACNAMEE The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: No Comments Environmental: No Comments Fire: No Comments Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Comments Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: No Comments Stormwater: No Comments Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: No Comments Planning: No Comments Other: No Comments Notes: THIS APPLICATION IS INSUFFICIENT FOR THE CDB. SUBMIT REVISED PLANS AND APPLICATION PACKAGE BY NOON ON 6/30/04 FOR REVIEW BY DRC ON 8/12/04. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 55 1.30 pm Case Number: FLD2004 -04029 -- 605 POINSETTIA AVE' Owner(s): Florence Enterprises 603 Indian Rocks Rd Belleau, FI 33756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email IR Applicant Florence Enterprises, Llc 256 President St Dunedin, Fl 34698 TELEPHONE: 733 -3769, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Patti The Architect Inc 1634 San Roy Dr Dunedin, F134698 TELEPHONE: 727 - 733 -3769, FAX: 727 - 733 -3769, E -MAIL: parch @gate.net Location: 0.26 acres located on the east side of Poinsettia Avenue, approximately 300 feet north of Bay Esplanade (north of Clearwater Beach Recreation Complex). Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit seven attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to xx feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building and pavement), reductions to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to xx feet (to patios), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 39.25 feet (to roof deck) with an additional xx feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and an additional xx feet (from roof deck for a roof top pavillion), and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right -of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, and Preliminary Plat approval for seven townhome lots (PLT2004- 00004). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 827 Mandalay Ave TELEPHONE: 727 - 446 -5801, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: dmacnav @att.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner Attendees Included: City Staff: Chip Gerlock, Wayne Wells, Scott Rice, Joe Colbert Applicant/Representative: Patti Stough, ddb ecs1c&r I v_ %. � y The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: ^'�''� General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 25 9Z 32ud - b00Z `OI ounp ',cups nql - upua$d mMON luatudolanaQ :all d •sanssl oN •sanssl oN :Ieluautuo.tlnua •pattadssnu si ,.tanamOq,, prom oql `outl pt£ °„ suotlrloN luld,, (Z •Iuld aql uo luld posodotd jo uotlduosop ,C.trpunoq paaN (I :SNOIJIQNOD JVJJ JNRIdgNIJNg - b0000-1700ZI'Id •,ClunoO sullouid gltm paptooai lrld luutd (I :Inuuod 5uiplmq of Loud possatppr oq of Suimollo3 aqZ -aw of .loud passaippu oq of anoqu ogl3o lid •ua.iu Outiuls molts of paau °atgrotlddu3I (ti •sueld uo umogs loN (-op `solaigan,Cwnttap pur aotntas `slsanO) 431iud stoltstn op atagAk (£I •sutrut S lilln i?ut)stxa oouldoj/utulutuu of spaau ,i)!D agl3t (s)luatuasra utgltm slurld poOuump to polooidn IIL,/Xuu Jo3 atgtsuodsat aq Iou IIIn1 f4tD aqZ •Nsu s,.taumo ,Clzadotd oql lu pallulsut oq lltm luautasua Sue utgltm 2upugd lid (ZI •paltelsut aq of Sutoi? wr saxogltutu oql ongm molts of paaN (I I •Iaags fllltln uo umogs oq Isntu Iuld posodold .tad sail lo'I (0I aotnap toluanatd moUNouq ,iuu jo apts oopaos oql uo pallelsui aq llegs adtd uoit oltlonp 3o luiof auo Isual ld •aotnap .toluanaid moglouq put, dul ,Cuu uaamlaq pollelsut oq isntu adtd uon oltlonQ •.zalotu .tolrm puu de) ,Cur uoamlaq pallelsut oq Isms[ odtd uoit oplonct (6 •luuotlddu oql Aq io3 p!ud oq of saa3 alquotlddu IId •sluatuaunbaz luatulirdaQ and laatu of pollrlsut slurtp,iq atg (Z) oil paaN (g •Isoo uotlellrlsut .taglo IIr pue saa3 paletoossu Ilu io3 atgtsuodsat st luuotlddd •olquotlddu3t (aotnap toluanatd mog )Iouq) •Q•d•,I•g e pur .talatu .talum oql las `del ialum aptnoid Iltm iolunuua103o fIEO otil Q -100 tel 10 ialatuetp gout -1, autl atg 3g131(s)aotnap mogilorq posodoid3o sapts gloq uo amen 310 r llrlsut of paaN (9 •outl uotlooloid oig Irutalui ,Cur lo3 pammboi ag hugs iolow ssed,Cq gltm anlun iIoago .►oloalap algno(I (S •tuals,is ioptuuds oig aql ao3 Sutpltnq oql of ouq oig oql molts of paaN (b •onuand uplasutod �uolr utetu sus Sutlstxo oql molts of paaN (£ •umogs se s,Crmonup alazouoo oql .tapun lou 'santtp uoomlaq seaie ssetg oql utgltm sam cos .camas faeltues oql llelstu of paaN (Z •umogs Sr lou `(outl d4tadotd uto.g loo3 -auo) spiupuulS ,ilt0 .tad Ilumapts posodotd Ilulsut of paaN (I m W 1 . Show FDC at least 15 feet from the building and within 40 feet of a Fire Hydrant dedicated to Fire Sprinkler System. PRIOR TO CDB. 2. Provide a fire hydrant on the same side of the street and within 300 feet of the most remote point of the building. PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA 241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Plans submitted for Fire Review must reflect adherence to Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2001 Edition and the following Codes: NFPA 101, 2000 Edition, NFPA 70, 1999 Edition and Florida Statute 633. Show on a Code Reference Sheet. 5 . Fire Sprinkler installation shall be in accordance with NFPA 13, 1999 Edition by a licensed Fire Sprinkler Contractor under separate permit with drawings. Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT 6. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 '/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance. As per Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2001 Edition, modification to Section 3 -5.6 of NFPA 1. Please acknowledge intent to comply. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT 7. Clearances of 7 '/z feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA 1, Sec.3 -5.6 Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT 8. CLOUD ALL REVISIONS Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 No issues. Land Resources: 1 . The 12" Palm between lots 2 & 3is actually an Oak tree, revise plan and show the trees 12' radious canopy. Show prior to CDB. 2. Show root pruning requirements at the 12" oak tree if a cut in existing elevation is required under the canopy of this tree. Show prior to CDB. Landscaping: 1 . The site and archetectural plans do not match...? If the plans are overlayed the landscape is in the driveways and entry areas of the dwellings.. revise plans to match. Per Section 3- 1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Per Section 3- 1202.E.1. - 1 Tree /island minimum; 1 Tree /150 sq. ft. of required green space; Shrubs: 50% of required green space; and Groundcover shall be utilized for required green space in lieu of turf. If the plan that the architect is proposing is used for the site, adjust the driveways that have abutting drives redesigned to create space between them for landscaping. The garage doors are narrower than the drives and can be matched on at least one side to create a wider island than what is proposed on the plan submitted. If the engineers plan is to be used, revise the architectural to match and provide access to the front doors in the landscape plans. Parks and Recreation: Stormwater: Recreation Facilities impact fees of $200 for each new residential unit is due prior to building permit issuance or final plat, whichever occurs first. If 2 residential units are existing and 7 proposed, $1,000 will be due for 5 net new units. Contact Deb Richter at 562 -4817 if any questions. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 27 M Solid Waste: Prior to CDB: 1) The site is required to provide storm water attenuation and not just water quality. The proposed redevelopment comes under retrofit conditions where the developer obtains 1/2 credit for any existing impervious that is undergoing redevelopment. This site also qualifies for stormwater payment in lieu of retention if the developer wishes to apply. 2) Section A -A on Sheet 3 of 4 shows a TOB of 5.25 and pond bottom EL. of 4.5. The existing ground surface in this area is approximately EL. 4.3. On Section A -A, show grades required to build the pond as designed. This is of major concern as all the runoff will be directed to the rear of the site with a 3 inch deep swale to lead the overflow to the street. This design is not acceptable as the property to the east of this site could be flooded out in a severe storm event. The city will accept payment in lieu of retention only if the detention area is adjacent to the city street and it is suggested that one of the buildings be eliminated or all of the building footprints be reduced so as to create an area for detention along Poinsettia. It is indicated that "black barrels" will be used for trash service. Where will they be stored? If proposed to be stored in the garages, will there be sufficient area inside to store the black barrel? Traffic Engineering: 1 , 1. Demonstrate how two cars will fit in the enclosed garage. 2. Sight triangles are shown incorrectly on Sheets 1 and 2 of 4. The base of the triangles are to be along the property line as shown on Sheet L -1. 2. The above to be addressed prior to CDB. Traffic Impact Fee to be accessed and paid prior to C.O. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 28 I . The application lists the property owner as Wayne Phillips; however, the property Appraisers Office indicates the owner is Florence Enterprises. The deed recorded on February 27, 2003, also indicates Florence Enterprises as the owner. Revise the application. 2. The application lists the parcel size to be 11,550 square feet; however, the site plan indicates the parcel size to be 11,375 square feet. Revise either the application or the site plan to the correct parcel size. 3 . Complete the address for the agent on the application to include the city, state and zip code. 4. Complete the address for the applicant on the application to include the city, state and zip code. The applicant's email address is illegible. Revise. 5. Sight triangles on the site plan and landscape plans are not drawn correctly. Sight triangles are 20'x20', measured along the property line and the each side of the edge of the driveways. 6. Remove existing site improvements from Sheets 1 and 2 of 4 of the civil site plan set, as this information is inconsequential and only makes the drawing confusing. Alternately, provide a separate demolition plan. 7. There is an inconsistency between the civil site plans prepared by Governale Engineering Services, Inc., the reduced 8.5'x11" site plans and the application. The civil site plans indicate the building to be set back 19.82 feet (Unit 1) from the front property line on the south side of the site and 19.86 feet (Unit 7) on the north side of the site. The reduced site plan and the application appear to indicate a different ground level building footprint and a front setback of 13 feet. Revise /coordinate. 8. Show on the civil site plan the actual building footprint proposed with solid lines and any second floor overhangs /projections with dashed lines, including dimensions to the building, the building dimensions (and individual units), and the dimensions of any second floor overhangs /projections. 9. It appears on the civil site plan Sheet 1 of 4 that the width of the driveways is 15 feet; however, pavement shading obscures the dimension. Revise. 10. Revise the land use data table on Sheet I of 4 for the proposed rear setback (indicated is 23.8 feet, but dimensioned is 10 feet). 11 . Provide floor plans for each floor the units (if one floor plan is applicable to more than one unit, note such). Only the first floor of the units was submitted with the application. 12. Site plan appears to indicate a 15 -foot wide driveway, which is insufficient for two cars to park in. Building elevations indicate a single -wide garage door. The land use data table indicates two parking spaces per unit. Unit depth does not appear to provide for two cars in the garage. Make it clear of the location of provided parking. 13. Provide the scale of the building elevation drawings on Sheet A -1. 14. Depict by shading or crosshatching all required paved vehicular use area interior landscaped areas. Additionally, include in the site data table the square footage of pavement, the square footage of interior landscaped area and the percentage of the interior landscaped area in relation to the paved vehicular use area. 15. Indicate on the site plan the location of air condensing units. If located on the roof, note such on the plans. 16. Address site outdoor lighting. 17. Provide in the site data table the number of existing dwelling units or overnight accommodation units. 18. The building height has been indicated to be 39.25 feet to the roof deck. Provide the height of the elevator and stair room projections above the roof deck to their highest point of their roof. Additionally, provide the height of the parapet from the roof deck. Unclear what the structure is for the center unit above the roof deck (outline the proposed use of this structure). Unless this is for elevator or stairs, staff does not support this building projection. 19. Submit a reduced landscape plan for CDB presentation purposes (8.5 "x11 20. It is unclear based on the building elevations of how or where the building facade undulates based on the planes of the facade. Side elevations do not help with understanding the ins and outs of the front or rear elevations. Suggest a perspective drawing or building sections to explain the building facade undulation. 21 . Bay windows on the north and south elevations are incomplete on Sheet A -1. 22. Bay windows shown on the north and south elevations do not match depictions on the east or west elevations. Some show an angled wall under the window but some show a 90- degree projection of the floor joists. Revise /coordinate. 23 . Arched window on top floor in the center unit on the east elevation is drawn twice as a shadow. Revise. 24. Quarter -moon windows on west elevation for two units on either end of the building don't coincide with any other windows planned for building and appear out of place. Revise. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 29 i, V I , 25 . Garage door locations on west building elevations, the driveway locations on 8.5 "x11" site plan submitted by the architect and driveway locations on civil and landscape plans do not match. Coordinate building elevations, site and landscape plans relating to garage doors and driveway locations. 26. East building elevation indicates sliding or french doors on the rear of each unit on the ground floor. Site plan does not indicate any requried stoops for these doors. Revise site plan Sheet 1 of 4. Also, these stoops will encroach into the common area indicated on Preliminary Plat. 27. West elevation appears to indicate planters on the ground floor and on the thrid floor. These planters on the ground floor are not indicated on the site plan. Unclear how planters on the third floor will be maintained. Revise all appropriate drawings. 28. West building elevation - Northern unit indicates a scored stucco joint/joist above the garage. This scored stucco joint/joist is not repeated on all other units. Southern unit does not indicate the column on the south end of the garage. Revise. 29. Trees indicated on the west building elevation are not proposed trees (per landscape plan). Remove. 30. Rear (east) elevation is very plain, with large expanses of wall. Break up with banding or other measures. 31 . North and south building elevations do not match as to windows. Unclear why bay windows on different floors are situated in proposed locations. Floor plans may help with understanding these window locations. 32. West elevation - a window appears to be drawn for the center unit (#4) on the "ground" floor, but appears unfinished. Revise. 33. Windows under the columned pediment on the west elevation for the northern units are different than the southern units. Revise. 34. Condtion to be included in staff report: That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s) -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work. 35. Revise written submittal narrative to address responses to each of the General Applicability criteria and the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria. Do not be general; be specific in how the proposal meets each of the criteria: a. include in the responses specific information, such as how the proposed townhomes are in scale with the bulk and height of surrounding buildings (provide the heights of surrounding buildings); b. in the second paragraph, provide the proposed height of the townhomes; c. unclear in second paragraph, fourth sentence, what is meant by "and greater setbacks "; d. front elevation appears to indicate concrete ballusters, whereas the last sentence in paragraph five indicates "all railings will be black or mill finish aluminum "; e. in the sixth paragraph, it indicates a "newly constructed" building. Unclear what building you are referring to. If you are referring to the proposed building, you indicate the building is two living floors over ground level parking, yet your drawings indicate three levels of living above ground level parking; f. indicate how the proposed reduction in the side and rear setbacks results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; g. reference to the current use as a motel in paragraph eight is inconsistent with the characterization of the change in occupancy from apartments in paragraph nine; h. unclear as to what prior townhome projects are referenced at the end of paragraph 10; i. in paragraph 13, reference is made to two parcels. According to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, there is only one parcel made up of two lots. j. under Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria, paragraph three, unclear what docks you are referring to; k. under Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria, paragraph four, unclear why you are commenting on a fire hydrant at a dock, since this property is not on the water; 1. under Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria, paragraph five, unclear as to reference to the garages having two cars, since the drawings appear to propose one -car garages, and the driveway length does not match the site plan. 36. On the Preliminary Plat, provide the lot area for each of the seven lots. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 30 37 . Provide a point -by -point narrative as to how this project complies with the Beach By Design Design Guidelines (narrative to include "Old Florida District" and Design Guidelines, starting on page 56). 38. Condition to be included in staff report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 39. Condition to be included in staff report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permit; 40. Include in the narrative how the increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 41 . Based on the small site plan submitted by the architect with a front setback shown of 13 feet, include in the narrative how the reduction to the front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life, and how it results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance (why can't the required setback be met ?). 42. In the narrative include how the reduction to the side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance (why can't required setbacks be met ?). Other: No Comments Notes: This application is insufficient for the CDB. Submit revised plans and application package by noon on 6/30/04 for review by DRC on 8/12/04. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 31 Case Number: PLT2004 -00004 -- 605 POINSETTIA AVE Owner(s): Florence Enterprises 603 Indian Rocks Rd Belleair, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Wayne Phillips 256president St Dunedin, F134698 TELEPHONE: 734 -0006, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Patti The Architect Inc 1634 San Roy Dr Dunedin, F134698 TELEPHONE: 727 - 733 -3769, FAX: 727 - 733 -3769, E -MAIL: parch @gate.net Location: 0.26 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF POINSETTIA AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET NORTH OF BAY ESPLANADE (NORTH OF CLEARWATER BEACH RECREATION COMPLEX) Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Preliminary Plat for seven townhome lots (related to FLD2004- 04029) Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 827 Mandalay Ave TELEPHONE: 727 - 446 -5801, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: dmacnav @att.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner Attendees Included: CITY STAFF: CHIP GERLOCK, WAYNE WELLS, SCOTT RICE, JOE COLBERT APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: PATTI STOUGH, LEO GOVERNALE The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: No Review Performed Environmental: No Review Performed Fire: No Review Performed Harbor Master: No Review Performed Legal: No Review Performed Land Resources: No Review Performed Landscaping: No Review Performed Parks and Recreation: No Review Performed Stormwater: No Review Performed Solid Waste: No Review Performed Traffic Engineering: No Review Performed Planning: No Review Performed Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page 56 Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC /,° - -,-/ 7 -, ? o0 y L) v0 6 ,% Case No. Meeting Date: Location: ❑ Current Use: ❑ Active Code Enforcement Cas (no, es: GL,` ❑ Address number tes no) (vacant land) ❑ Landscaping es) no) • Overgrown (yes) 4& • Debris (yes) 6D • Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) (no) ❑ Building(s) good) fair) (poor) (vacant land) ❑ Fencing none (good) (dilapidated) (broken and /or missing pieces) • Pal t (good) air) (poor) (garish) • Grass Parking (yes (no) • Residential Parking Violations (yes) (no) • Signag (none) ok) (not ok) (billboard) • Parkin LnI-a>triped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) ❑ Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) ❑ Outdoor storage (yes) no) Comments /Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date:_1 Reviewed Revised 03-29-61; 02 -04 -03 Telephone: -c/ ,P aellas County Property Appr -: -er Information: 05 29 15 54810 000 01' 1) Page 2 of 5 05 / 29 / 18 / 54810 / 000 / 0110 28- Apr -2004 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:18:33 Ownership Information Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales FLORENCE ENTERPRISES OBK: 12562 OPG: 0288 603 INDIAN ROCKS RD BELLEAIR FL 33756 -2056 Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 605 POINSETTIA AUE of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2001 - 2002: 338,900 Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp Plat Information 2 /2,003 12,5621 288 350,000 (Q) I 1950: Book 024 Pgs 080- 2 /2,003 12,51511,473 175,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 6 /1,984 5,793/1,321 150,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 2003 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 283,600 Homestead: 0 Ownership % .000 Historic : 0 Use %: .000 Assessed /Cap: 283,600 Tax Exempt %: .000 Other Exempt: 0 Taxable: 283,600 Agricultural: 0 2003 Tax Information Updates for 2004 Land Information in progress. 2004 Changes not reflected in 2003 Values. District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater view: 03 Millage: 23.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 03 Taxes: 6,546.93 1) 175 x 65 21100.00 175.00 F Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2003 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 6,546.93 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2003 taxes will be 6,546.93 Short Legal MANDALAY REPLAT UNIT 5 LOTS ii & 12 Description Building Information http: / /pao.co.pinellas. fl.uslhtbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &Y= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p... 4/28/2004 F nellas County Property Appr 'er Information: 05 29 15 54810 000 01 '1) Page 3 of 5 Updates for 2004 in progress. 2004 changes not reflected in 2003 values. Property and Land Use Code descriptions 05 / 291 15 / 54810 000 / 0110 :01 28- Apr -2004 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:18:33 Residential Card 01 of i Prop Use; 220 Land Use; 08 Living Units; 3 Imp Type: Duplex/Triplex Prop Address: 605 POINSETTIA AUE Structural E1omsnts Foundation Continuous Wall Quality Area Average Floor System Slab on Grade Year Built Base Area 1,956 Exterior Wall ConcBk Stucco /Reclad Effective Age 35 Roof Frame Gable -Hip Heating Unit /Spc /W1 /F1 Furn Roof Cover Composite Shingle Cooling Garage None 252 9) Fixtures 0 9 # Stories 1.0 Other Depreciation 0 Floor Finish Crpt /Unyl /SftUd /Terr Functional Depreciation 0 Interior Finish Drywall /Plaster Econonomic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras Rc! 1jLdo "Lt1a1 Extra Fcatures Description Dimensions Description Factor Area RCD Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 J, 95J 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .20 185 8) .00 0 3) Garage .35 252 9) .00 0 4) Enclosed Porch .45 220 10) .00 0 5) 6) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Rc! 1jLdo "Lt1a1 Extra Fcatures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) PATIO /DECK 150SF 3.00 150 0 350 1,995 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 350 Map With Property Address (non- vacant) 9:10191111100 1 http: / /pao.co. pinellas .fl.uslhtbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p... 4/28/2004 P4nellas County Property Appr -= --er Information: 05 29 15 54810 000 01' r. Y k� 'tir� � _ f jI � [�'llA J R .1• IT d Y ttF 0 AY AD OT k MAt�DAELA.,�I f INSEETI AV Al INSET71 AVE G F,j] Uj z L I a. 4JUANITA Page 4 of 5 62' L A. f ri Ln r i c c r �S (BAY ESPLANADE.' 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http: / /pao.co.pinellas .fl.us /htbin/cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p... 4/28/2004 Pinellas County Property Appoer Information: 05 29 15 54810 000 0 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Se..arch..:Pa2e An explanation of this screen http: / /pao.co.pinellas. fl.uslhtbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &c =1 &r= .16 &s= 4 &t3 =1 &u= 0 &p... 4/28/2004 40 ej. 4w 6, 0, i 'illy ®E►CHMAH- PARAki-A �ll II�I�1 GENERAL CONTRACTORS Rob Parker 1008 Broadway 727.736.9090 OFFICE Dunedin, FL 34698 727.733.6695 FAX deichparkl Qaol.com 727.463.6552 MOBILE Rod P ker 4� r e Re a _3 —mss, WIN. 6. �t 727 -7- 6695 P.3 .f"a em, "It I Cut-Joe r�5 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, January 18, 2005, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (cont. from 12/14/04) 1504 Garden Inc. is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales within an existing two -story commercial building with a reduction to lot area from 10,000 sq ft to 7,720 sq ft, a reduction to lot width (west) from 100 ft to 50.81 ft, reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 1.9 ft (to existing and proposed building) and from 25 ft to 5 ft (to proposed pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to proposed pavement), and reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 1 ft (to existing and proposed building) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to proposed pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 704.C, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction in the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building (west side) from 5 ft to 3.75 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Retail sales and services) at 503 Marshall St., E.A. Marshall's Sub, Lot 10 & W 'h of vac alley on E. Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2004 -02010 2. (cont. from 12/14/04) Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 133 attached dwelling units and an increase in the permitted height from 30 ft to 100 ft (as measured from base flood elevation and the mean elevation of the site) under the provisions of Sec 2- 903.B. (Proposed Use: 133 attached dwelling units) at 900 North Osceola Ave, J.A. Gorra's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 2 &3, part of Lot 1 and VAC Nicholson St, Sue Barco Sub, Lots 1, 13 &14, Lot 23, part of Lot 22, F.T. Blish's Sub, Lots 1 -3, Lots 8 -10 and tringl land to West, Sec. 09- 29 -15, M &B 14.01. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner III. FLD2004 -07053 03 Florence Enterprises, LLC is requesting a (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 8 attached dwellings ( townhomes) with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 11.3 ft (to building), reductions to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 8.52 ft (to the northeast corner of the ground floor of the building), from 20 ft to 5.52 ft (to ground floor stoop) and from 20 ft to 8.02 ft (to second through fourth floor balconies), an increase to building height from 35 ft to 37 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 12.67 ft for a roof top pavilion (from roof deck) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right -of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2- 803.C, (2) Transfer of Development Rights for 1 dwelling unit from 200 Brightwater Dr, under the provisions of Sec 4 -1403 (TDR2004- 08009) and (3) Preliminary Plat approval for 8 townhome lots (PLT2004- 00004). (Proposed Use: 8 attached dwellings (townhomes) at 605 Poinsettia Ave, Mandalay Replat, Unit 5, Lots 11 &12. Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2004 -04029 4. La Salle Realty, LLC is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a nonresidential off - street parking lot in the Low Medium Density Residential District, under the provisions of Sec 2- 204.C. (Proposed Use: Non - residential off - street parking) at 25191 US 19 N, Chautauqua -Sec A, Units 2 -3 -4, Blk 35, Lots 1 -9, 24 -32, and part of VAC Rd W, Chautauqua -Sec A, Unit 1, Blk 36, Lots 1 -5, 28 -32, and parts of Lots 6 & 27. Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2004 -08061 5. Decade Gulfcoast Hotel Partners and J K Gulfview, LLC are requesting (1) Termination of Status of a Nonconformity for density (existing 289 - rooms /units overnight accommodation use — to be converted to 241 - rooms /units overnight accommodation use and 36 dwelling units), under the provisions of Sec 6 -109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (241 -unit overnight accommodation use [including accessory restaurant, retail sales and wave runner business], 38 attached dwellings, a restaurant and an office use) with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 3.52 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 2.95 ft (to existing pavement), an increase to building height from 35 ft to 128 ft (to highest roof deck) with an additional 16 ft for the pinnacle facade focal point (from highest roof deck) and with a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights for two dwelling units from 850 Bayway Blvd, under the provisions of Sec 4 -1403 (TDR2004- 09011). Proposed Use: Mixed use (241 -unit overnight accommodation use with accessory restaurants and retail sales and 38 attached dwellings [condominium]) at 521 S Gulfview Blvd., Sec 17- 29 -15, M &B 22.02. Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner Ill. FLD2004 -04025 6. Highland Prop Gulfcoast, LTD (Crown Eurocars, Inc.) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit vehicle sales and display with a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 6 ft (to existing pavement), an increase to building height from 25 to 26 ft (to flat roof deck) with an additional 4 ft for an architectural embellishment (from roof deck) and deviations to permit the outdoor display of vehicles and to permit direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 704.C, and a reduction to the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from 5 ft to 1 ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Vehicle sales and display) at 18940 US 19 N, Sec 19- 29 -16, M &B 41.05. Presenter: Keyl Groff, Planner II. FLD2004- 10074c 7. 302 -308 N Osceola Properties, LLC, Osceola -Jones Properties LLC, Salvation Army (Triangle Property Development, LLC) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 191 attached dwelling units, a reduction in required parking from 371 parking spaces (1.5 spaces per dwelling unit and 4 spaces per 1,000 sq ft GFA for non - residential uses as required by Code) to 343 spaces (1.5 spaces per dwelling unit or 290 spaces, 2.55 spaces per 1,000 sq ft GFA for office uses or 53 spaces and zero spaces for the retail uses), an increase in the permitted height from 30 ft to 150 ft to the roof and up to 174 ft to architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the west side of North Osceola Ave, an increase in height from 30 ft to 50 to the roof and up to 58 ft to architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the east side of North Osceola Ave and an increase of the permitted density from 145 dwelling units to 191 dwelling units by using 45 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 903.C. (Proposed Use: Mixed use (191 attached dwelling units and approximately 20,000 sq ft of retail and office uses), at 400 Jones St, Jones' Sub of Nicholson's Add to Clearwater Harbor, Blk 2, Part of Lots 1 & 2, A.B. & Jennie Cate's Sub, Lots 1 -7 & VAC Alley & Bergen's Replat, Blk A & B & VAC Alley, Sec 09- 29 -15, M &B 43.03, Sec 09- 29 -15, M &B 43.06, Clovis C. Lutz Sub, Tracts A & B & submerged land Deed # 17377 & 10 ft strip of land adj N & submerged land. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner III. FLD2004 -05037 8. Nikieh Properties LLC is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 9.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building and pavement) and reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 1 ft (to sidewalk), and an increase in building height from 25 ft to 38 ft (to roof peak for decorative architectural design), and a reduction in required parking from 44 spaces to 36 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 704.C, and to allow 2 landscape islands to be less than 8 ft wide (from back of curb to back of curb) as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Retail sales and services), at 21557 US 19, Sec.08- 29 -16, M &B 33.06. Presenter: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2004 -10075 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request and obtain party status by the Board during the case discussion, a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board if person requesting such demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562 -4557 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk Cyndi Tarapani Planning Department City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562 -4090. Ad: 01/02/05 W V') bc) S P ()'I (7q SANFILIPPO, JAMES A DEAN REAL ESTATE INV INC MARTIN, JOHN E 647 BAY ESPLANADE 47 BLACK HAWK CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 HOLMDEL NJ 07733 - 2523 CALDERONI,PASQUALE THE CALDERONI, AIDA THE 4516 W NORTH B ST TAMPA FL 33609 - 2032 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 ADRIC, ALFRED C JR ADRIC, ALMUTH H IN DEN WEINGAERTEN 23A 65835 LIEDERBACH TS 00004 - GERMANY SHEAR, L DAVID C/O RUDEN, MC CLOSKY, SMITH 401 E JACKSON ST STE 2700 TAMPA FL 33602 - 5841 SOULOUNIAS, KALIOPE 30 KENDALL ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1624 COATES I INC 873 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1826 MILLARD, EVANGELINE G 15 GLENDALE ST # A -5 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1551 HUBBARD, EUNICE 1736 SAINT PAULS DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6462 GUNTHER, EDWARD F GUNTHER, APPLE R 286 PRAIRIE VIEW LN WHEELING EL 60090 - 3223 MEROLI, PETER 967 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 1020 YEAROUT, JANE R JACKSON, LANNY R YEAROUT, JANET A JACKSON, VICKI J 806 NARCISSUS 651 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1334 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - FLORENCE ENTERPRISES 603 INDIAN ROCKS RD BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 2056 P R M H INV CORP INC 584 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613 MINK, MICHAEL MINK, TAMARA 5054 QUILL CT PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - MAGILL, ROBERT P 584 BAY ESPLANADE # 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613 YEAROUT, JANET A YEAROUT, JAMES R 806 NARCISSUS CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1334 MEROLI, PETER 967 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 1020 MILLER, DIANE L 622 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1632 GIBSON, JACK R JR 4725 SEYMOUR RD JACKSON MI 49201 - 7636 MAN US, GEORGE E 9480 BRYNDALE WAY NE ADA MI 49301 - 8854 NOSTIMO INC C/O MINCIELLI, ATHENA 1036 MCLEAN ST DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3533 FLORIDA POWER CORP C/O TAX DEPT CX1G PO BOX 14042 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 4042 LOLOS, DINOS LOLOS, DIMITRA 627 KINKAID DES PLAINES IL, 60016 - 5855 BLACKWOOD, WILLIAM 608 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1616 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE GUNTHER, EDWARD F GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED 419 EASTSHORE DR GUNTHER, APPLE R C/0 PROPERTY TAX SECTION CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 286 PRAIRIE VIEW LN PO BOX 152206 WHEELING IL, 60090 - 3223 IRVING TX 75015 - 2206 CHARBONEAU, RENEE A MAG LAND DEVELOPMENT CALDERONI, PASQUALE THE 9342 HIDDEN WATER CIR 3385 OLD KEYSTONE RD CALDERONI, AIDA THE RIVERVIEW FL 33569 - 3031 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 4516 W NORTH B ST TAMPA FL 33609 - 2032 DE BENEDITTIS, FRANK DE BENEDITTIS, NANCY 4602 104TH ST CORONA NY 11368 - 2813 BEACH & GULF SANDS INC 657 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1515 WITHERS, JOHN 954 MASON HEADLEY RD LEXINGTON KY 40504 - 2247 PARE, CAROL A 15 GLENDALE ST # 15 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1552 WHITEHURST, DON R 778 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1815 GEMETTE, GREGORY S 346 IVY DRIVE GIBSONIA PA 15044 - 8931 DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC 90 MILVAN DR TORONTO ON M91, 1Z6 00030 - CANADA CZIPRI, BRENDA K THE 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 LOPEZ, CHARLIE 4302 LEMON ST TAMPA FL 33609 - 2112 PAYETTE, R J III THE PAYETTE, BONNIE M THE 7946 31 ST AVE KENOSHA WI 53142 - 4618 BREEZEWAY INC 602 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1635 SCHAPER, CHARLES F 580 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1609 POOK, PEACHES 234 DOLPHIN POINT RD # 1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2110 KOZIK, CHRISTIAN A KOZIK, ROBERT D 852 NARCISSUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1131 PORPOISE INN INC 609 CYPRUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1621 OSTROWSKI, JOZEF ALBRECHT, YVETTE SMERT, LUTHER L JR OSTROWSKI, RENATA 16 ASHENDEN WALK SMERT, SHARON D 64 BAY ESPLANADE FARNHAM COMMON BUCKS SL2 1199 SHIPWATCH CIR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1608 3UF 00009 - TAMPA FL 33602 - 5740 UNITED KINGDOM MEROLI, PETER CORNELL, MICHAEL PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE VON FELDT, PAUL G CORNELL, JANA 419 EASTSHORE DR 967 ELDORADO AVE 1525 WINDING WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - ANDERSON IN 46011 - 1661 1020 NELSON, EARL G NELSON, GLORIA M 2060 ARCADE ST ST PAUL MN 55109 - 2565 PORTER, THOMAS PORTER, MARCELLA 2256 VICTORIA WINDSOR ON N8X 1R1 00030 - CANADA TALON PROJECT - 3437 OTTERDAY CIR SHAKOPEE MN 55379 - 9615 CARAS, FLORINS ROPHIE, RALPH A LO, JAMES K CIO GEORGE KOLITSAS ROPHIE, VANESSA LO, KAREN A 2454 AUSTRALIA WAY E # 42 450 PALM ISL SE 2966 POST ROCK CT CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 3818 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1938 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - CHAPEL BY SEA CLEARWATER DANNA, MARK A BEACH COMMUNITY CHURCH 584 BAY ESPLANADE # 3 INC CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613 54 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1607 HESS, PAULINE D THE HESS, DONALD E THE 2261 TAMPA RD PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5847 COATES I INC 873 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1826 BAY ESPLANADE APTS INC PALM PAVILION CLWR INC C/O PETER MAKRIS 18 BAY ESPLANADE 5006 SHAMROCK DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1603 NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34652 - 4936 VILLAS OF CLEARWATER BEACH RENDEL, JEROLD S THE CONDO ASSN INC 990 BAY ESPLANADE C/O VALERIE JONES CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1003 15 GLENDALE ST APT A14 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1514 AERQ INC 22 KENDALL ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1626 JACKSON, LANNY R JACKSON, VICKI J 651 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - THURMOND, WILLIAM H THURMOND, CAROL H 643 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 FLORIDA POWER CORP C/O TAX DEPT CXIG PO BOX 14042 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 4042 BAY ESPLANADE 617 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 H & HS BEACH PLACE 7105 PELICAN ISLAND DR TAMPA FL 33634 - 7461 YEAROUT, JANE R DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC YEAROUT, JANET A 90 MILVAN DR 806 NARCISSUS TORONTO ON M9L 1Z6 00030 - CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1334 CANADA NAGENGAST, WILLIAM NAGENGAST, JUDITH E 925 ANDERSON FRANKLIN RD ANDERSON IN 46011 - 8737 CHAPEL BY SEA CLEARWATER BEACH COMMUNITY CHURCH INC 54 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1607 GRASSO, JOSEPH F GRASSO, OLGA 30 TURNER ST # 504 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5258 IGGESUND TOOLS N AMERICA 220 SCARLET BLVD OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 3016 HUBER, RICHARD C HUBER, DIANE M 9217 SUNNY OAK DR RIVERVIEW FL 33569 - 5672 RA LEY, DANIEL E RAILEY, ANN H 1345 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6533 XANIA INC C/O LAMPATHAKIS, JAME 1299 MAIN ST STE E DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5333 FLAVAN, JOHN M 450 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2529 SAMPSON, THOMAS A SAMPSON, CAROLYN L 16461 ROCKY POINT RD MORRISON CO 80465 - 2166 ALBANESE, MARIA G 9 CORNELIUS PKWY TORONTO ON M61, 2K2 00030 - CANADA SEIFERT, MICHAEL E SEIFERT, NANCY S 5825 PERSIMMON DR MADISON WI 53711 - 5003 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 SHEAR, L DAVID C/O RUDEN, MC CLOSKY, SMITH 401 E JACKSON ST STE 2700 TAMPA FL 33602 - 5841 NATSIS, EVANGELOS NATSIS, MARIA 622 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1638 MANUS, GEORGE E NAGENGAST, WILLIAM E JACKSON, LANNY R 9480 BRYNDALE WAY NE NAGENGAST, JUDITH E JACKSON, VICKI J ADA MI 49301 - 8854 925 ANDERSON FRANKTON RD 651 BAY ESPLANADE ANDERSON IN 46011 - 8737 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - MEROLI, PETER 967 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 1020 TALON PROJECT 3437 OTHERDAY CIR SHAKOPEE MN 55379 - 9615 AIELLO, ITALO RUFFOLD, LILIA 93 CORNELIUS PKWY TORONTO ON M6L 2K6 00030 - PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 419 EASTSHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 RUSULIS, ELAINE THE 31 ISLAND WAY # 602 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2206 YEAROUT, JAMES 806 NARCISSUS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334 LOOKRETIS, JOHN L LOOKRETIS, SOPHIE 29 AVALON ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1602 BAY ESPLANADE CONDO ASSN 584 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613 EVERETT, JOE S PO BOX 803 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0803 WALLACE, A BARBARA 606 CYPRUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1620 TAYLOR, THOMAS G TAYLOR, RAIL,I I PO BOX 3069 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8069 D -GEM 625 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 CALDERONI, PASQUALE THE CALDERONI, AIDA THE 4516 W NORTH B ST TAMPA FL 33609 - 2032 CALDERONI, PASQUALE THE CALDERONI, AIDA THE 4516 W NORTH B ST TAMPA FL 33609 - 2032 CAY AT CLEARWATER BEACH CONDO ASSN INC 620 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 1632 Patricia Stough David MacNamee Doug Williams, President Patti the Architect, Inc. Clearwater Beach Association Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition 1634 San Roy Drive 827 Mandalay Ave. 2544 Frisco Drive Dunedin, FL 34698 Clearwater, FL 33767 Clearwater, FL 33761 ttiS CYa�a1a q G��v a Cry C I -L OS CtS OUA 4'E . CUSDA L W A..2� , F- U -(L- % t*-" -A �iJ JAN IS' 2005 E L b Z,--) a 4 -- (D401-9i , c� S PD ( io S ev—n , A NVL- A,t-jr,,. PAN. --mrN - eA L4� to i 1/15/2005 City of Clearwater Planning Department P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 Re: Case Number FLD2004- 04029 ---- Poinsettia Ave. Dear Madam, iu if � �� s zoos v+N C1� . 4F EVEARWA R VCS First, I must say that I am deeply saddened that any building of townhouses on Poinsettia or in this area would take place. Secondly, it is my feeling that by doing so will definitely take away from the "Old Florida" district look which is already appealing to the eye without any further three and four story townhouses built there. I would like for you ask yourself this question. Whose desire is it to have any townhouses built in this area? Is it the people that already live in the area or is it the city's desire or just exactly whose is it? After having further discussion with my family I will rescind my previous letter dated 1/11/05. SSincerely / WFemwood ace Avenue Grove City, OH 43123 -9269 614 - 871 -3573 01/15/2005 16:14 425226?71�8 17$55 E Take Desire Dr SE Renton, WA 98058 -9518 January 17, 2005 Flattening Director City. of Clearwater Pip Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 Dear Sir or Madam: THE UPS STORE PAGE 02/02 Subject: FLD2004- 04029, 605 Poinsettia Ave and Related Requests lli-I As a result of discussions with the developer, I have a better understanding of the impac of the subject requests upon the property at 606 Cyprus Ave. I now support appro al of the subject requests. Respectfully, to ':�- W C Wallace Barbara J. Hanscel 1421 West First Ave. Columbus, OH 43212 January 15, 2005 Ms. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756-4748 Dear Ms. Goudeau, PLAQ JAIN 18 2005 Due to recent discussions with my mother, Barbara Wallace, and other developments, 1 wish to rescind my objections to the Park Place project as stated in my letter dated January 12, 2005. Yours truly, Barbara Hanscel Mrs. A Barbara Wallace, 606 Cyprus Avenue, Clearwater, FL, 33767. Tel: 727 - 446 -1190. January 12, 2005. Ms. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk, City Hall, 112 South Osceola Ave., Clearwater, FL., for The Community Development Board. cc: Ms. Cyndi Tarapini, Director, Planning Department. Dear Sirs/Mmes, ' Re: Meeting of CDB for proposal FLD2004- 04029, 605 Poinsettia Avenue. January 18, 2005. Please note that I wish to record my objection to the proposals by Florence Enterprises LLC in regard to (a) the construction of townhomes at 605 Poinsettia Avenue, ref: FLD2004- 04029, and (b) the application by the proposed developers for Flexible Development approval to extend the height of these buildings and also greatly reduce the ground level rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 8.52 ft at one point and to 5.52 ft at another point, and related amounts at other levels. The reasons for my objection are as follows: 1. The proposed building, 8 attached townhomes, will be directly behind my home, which is a single story house that I have owned and occupied for over thirty years. They would replace a single story building divided into three ground level apartments and also occupy a presently vacant lot. It is my contention that this is an inappropriate location for such a change in the type of construction and not compatible with the Beach by Design concept for the Old Florida area. This is not "filling in" a vacant lot; an "Old Florida" style building will be demolished to make way for the new building. Beach by Design "contemplates the renovation and revitalization of existing improvements with limited new construction where renovation is impractical." In my opinion, this townhouse proposal does not meet that criterion. 2. The height of these proposed townhomes, at approximately 51 ft (35 + 4 + 12.67), would result in a wholly unreasonable loss of both light and privacy. Both of these would adversely affect my home and also the rear patio which is extensively used by me and also by visiting family members. The privacy aspect is rendered even more unreasonable in that there would be rear balconies from the second to fourth floors of these townhouses. 3. Other detrimental effects include: Potential noise problems from balconies overlooking my property, and also from living rooms so close to the property line. Noise from multiple mechanical systems for heat and air - conditioning units. "Light "pollution" from outside lighting. Potential flooding of my lot unless specific physical provisions are made for the redirection of water run -off to the west of the buildings. 4. I understand that the landscape buffers provided in this plan do not conform to Beach by Design for this area. 5. Furthermore, the detrimental effects mentioned above will inevitably and significantly reduce the value of my home. In addition to objecting to the building of the proposed townhouses, I further object to the developer's Flexible Development proposal. These proposals request a reduction in the rear setback (i.e. between their townhouses and my property) from 20 ft to 8.02 ft at the north -east corner of the ground floor and from 20 ft to 5.52 ft to the ground floor stoop, with related reductions at other levels. Also included is a further increase of 2 ft, to 53 ft, in the proposed height of the property. 2 These requested changes significantly increase the adverse effects on my property that I have enumerated above and also further reduce the value of my property. Also, it is my opinion that the owners of this proposed property, with a rear setback of only 5 ft to the property line, could not effectively maintain (painting, structural repair) the rear of the buildings without encroaching on my property with ladders etc. In conclusion, I am approaching 85 years of age, and a widow, without family members living in Florida or any adjacent State. I find it quite unconscionable that a matter that affects me so adversely, in the ways I have listed, is first presented for my consideration by a letter only 14 days before the matter comes before the Board for what is apparently a decision on final approval. This leaves me with insufficient time to obtain appropriate family consultation or consider the necessity for legal representation, an expense that I should not have to incur to defend my interests against a development proposal that impacts so severely on my quality of life and the value of my home. Yours truly, A Barbara Wallace. 3 1/11/2005 City of Clearwater . Planning Department P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 Re: Case # FLD2004- 04029 --- 605 Poinsettia Ave. Dear Madam, My name is Jeffrey R. Wallace and I am writing you with some concerns my family has with the above case. My mother, Barbara Wallace, lives at 606 Cyprus Avenue which is directly behind the property mentioned for improvement. I have read the request by the applicant and feel that what they propose to build will not be congruent with the existing homes that are already there. This would take away from" the "OLD FLORIDA" DISTRICT look which we have enjoyed for about 35 years. I am referring to the one to two story homes or motels or apartments. The proposed Townhouse for 7 apartments and at least 4 stories high would be completely out of place for the area. It would bring in more noises from the heating and cooling units. There could also be more noises when parties are being held there too. It would take away the privacy that my mother has and the rest of us when we are visiting her. We would no longer be able to enjoy sitting on the patio area or back porch which my mother does enjoy doing in the mornings. We would not be able to open our windows at night. Another big facture is that it could depreciate the value of 606 Cyprus which we are depending upon for when my mother decides to move into an assistant living home. You see, my mother is 84 years old. We are very concerned about her well being. I don't feel that anyone on the committees would like having a forty foot high wall within 10 feet of their back door. Well neither would we like it. I could see and would agree if the builders wanted to improve on the one story apartments that exist there but not a four story building please. So we sincerely hope that the committees will deny there requests and to build a larger building on that property be also denied. Please keep the Old Florida District looking the way it already exist. SiWly, Je 22 e. Grove City, OH 43123 -9269 614 -871 -3573 SAN I PU CJTY off g f I v ORIGINAL 17855 E Lake Desire Dr SE Renton, WA 98058 -9518 January 12, 2005 JAN 19 2005 Planning Director City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 Dear Sir or Madam: Subject: FLD2004- 04029, 605 Poinsettia Ave and Related Requests 1. I have a financial interest in the property at 606 Cyprus Ave and am substantially impacted by the subject requests. Furthermore, as simply a concerned citizen, I question the desirability of proposed development. The property at 606 Cyprus Ave is as private dwelling located directly to the rear of the proposed townhomes. 2. I object to the approval of the subject requests and ask that the City of Clearwater consider the following items when evaluating them: a. Do not relax any of the building height and setback requirements — the proposed height and closeness of the townhomes will have a negative impact upon the 606 Cyprus Ave property. The privacy, sunlight, and quietness currently enjoyed especially while in the backyard patio area will be destroyed. The landscaping will suffer from the reduced amount of sunlight it receives. The darkness and quietness at night when sleeping with windows open will be degraded. Exhaust fumes from cars in the garage may also be a problem. All of these concerns can be mitigated by requiring any new development if it should be approved to comply with building height and setback requirements. b. Can the city provide assurance that townhomes of the same height and rear setbacks as the proposed townhomes would by approved for 606 Cyprus Ave when it is redeveloped? I doubt that the owners of the proposed townhomes would endorse a proposal for a building that close to the rear balconies or their homes. If such assurance cannot be provided, then I must conclude that the fair market value of the property located at 606 Cyprus Ave will be reduced if the requests are granted. s • .# 1 .1 c. and revitalization of existing improvements with limited new construction where renovation is impractical ". It does not appear that the proposed development complies with this vision. The existing dwelling is consistent with this vision and it has not been demonstrated that it could not be renovated. d. Beach by Design for the Old Florida Subarea also states, "Densities in the area should be generally limited to the densities of existing improvements and building heights should be low to mid -rise ... ". Likewise, it does not appear that the proposal complies with this vision either. e. Require the location and fencing/shielding of garbage dumpsters so as to minimize the probability of debris being blown onto the 606 Cyprus Ave property and to minimize the impact of noise and /or odors associated with their operation. f. Require location and noise control (screening) of mechanical systems such as heating and air conditioning systems to minimize their impact upon the 606 Cyprus Ave. property. As previously stated, the backyard patio area is currently a quiet and peaceful refuge from the noise and hustle and bustle of everyday life in a city. Incessant mechanical system noise would destroy this refuge as well and making it difficult to sleep at night with windows open. g. Address outdoor lightning on the proposed townhomes so as to minimize its impact upon the 606 Cyprus Ave. property. h. Address storm water drainage so as to minimize its impact upon the 606 Cyprus Ave. property. As the current neighboring buildings have evolved over the last forty years, storm water runoff has become an increasing problem. Water from the current building at 605 Poinsettia Ave as well as the property to its north, currently dump storm water onto 606 Cyprus Ave. Request that no storm water be permitted to flow onto 606 Cyprus Ave. i. Consider the impact of loss of on- street parking. Currently parking is at a premium during busy beach days. A more modest development comprised of renovation of the current improvements with limited new construction could . preserve on- street parking. j. The lack of sidewalks, narrow streets and parked cars make it hazardous for beachgoers on busy days. Permitting backing onto a public street would appear to increase the likelihood of an accident involving an automobile or pedestrian (e.g., a family with little ones on their way to the beach). k. It appears that the proposed building will be over 45' tall and as such should have no more that 60% of its theoretical building envelope occupied by a building. It is not clear that the proposed townhomes comply with this Beach by Design criteria. j & .r- 1. It also appears that the request is for a'buildingfth one or more 100' uninterrupted planes. In summary, I ask that the requests be disapproved due the negative impact the proposals will have upon both the property value and quality of living at 606 Cyprus Ave. Furthermore, I request disapproval because the proposed townhomes are inconsistent with the vision for the Old Florida District Subarea of Beach by Design. It is practical to renovate and /or redevelop the property at 605 Poinsettia Ave without deviating from the intensity and development standards. Respectfully, VC W W C Wallace -3 V E :3 829 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER .s FRO; P yTT I THE ARCHITECT FAX N0. 7277333769 Jan. 18 2005 11: 24AM P4 4 \ Barbara J. Hanscel 1421 West First Ave. JAN 1 8 2005 � Columbus, OH 43212 OE�►ELUannE.�C! FARiAIER � SERVICES OEPT C►tv OF January 15, 2005 Ms, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P, O. Box 4748 ORIGINAL Clearwater, FL 33756 -4748 Dear Ms. Goudeau, Due to recent discussions with my mother, Barbara Wallace, and other developments,. I wish to rescind my objections to the Park Place project as stated in my letter dated January 12, 2005. Yours truly, Barbara Hanscel 0 1- 18- 05;10 :59AM;0fificia1 Records a w ;95624086 # 2/ 3 Barbara J. Hanscel W! 'Hiest First Ave. JAN 1 8 Columbus, OH 43212 ?OQ� �kro tit,. � 1 sicia _ January 12, 2005 Ms. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater FL 33756 -4748 Dear Ms. Goudeau, ORIGINAL I am writing this letter to state my objection to the proposal by Florence Enterprises LLC regarding the building of 8 townhomes on the property at 605 Poinsettia Ave and to the application for Flexible Development approval. This property lies directly behind the permanent residence of my 84 year old Mother's home at 6o6 Cyprus Ave. if the townhomes are built as proposed, the quality of her life will most certainly be changed for the worse. 1 have several concerns about the project, among them 1) the increased noise levels from not only people but heating and air conditioning units, 2) increased lights shining down on her property, 3) an excess of trash blowing over to her yard from the dumpsters that will be needed to accommodate 8 units, 4) the possibility of flooding on her property due to a change in the land, 5) damage to her back yard bushes and plants because of decreased sunlight caused by the shadow of the proposed building, 6) lack of any sense of privacy in the back yard because of rear balconies, 7) the inevitable reduction in the value of her property, and most importantly, 8) the stress and discomfort that my Mother .will be subjected to because of all the above mentioned if this project is approved and moves forward. 1 know that the wishes of my family must seem like small potatoes in comparison to that of a development company, but if you could just see it from our point of view. My parents, F'Fiy 4 Alings and / have been enjoying our home on the beach for many, many years. Our children have grown up anxiously waiting for vacation so they could go to the beach and now our grandchildren look forward to their visit to Grandma's house. We have come to know and expect to be able to enjoy an afternoon on the back patio watching the kids play or share a quiet conversation with friends or family - without being shadowed by a !a.—. building and peered donen upon by people in their balconies. My mother should be able to sit on her back porch with her cat to catch the warm winter sunshine as she is accustomed to doing. If the building is as high and as close to her property as proposed she will no longer be able to enjoy this. 1- 18- OS;10= 59AM;Official Records ;95624086 . f b n LT JAN ��05 D UELOPMEiur SF�!VICES pEpt CITY flF �*E cRnia..,. _ 1 sincerely hope that this objection is viewed fairly by c�ftp"MA and that much consideration be given before approving a building that does not appear to be in the best interest of the Old Florida District guidelines nor the interest of neighbors. Yours truly, / Barbara Hanscel ORIGINAL # 3/ 3 i 1. ': ;►. ow LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Ms. Patti Stough Patti the Architect, Inc. 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, FL 34698 C ITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562 -4576 RE: Development Order - Cases FLD2004- 04029 /PLT2004- 00004 /TDR2004 -08009 605 Poinsettia Avenue Dear Ms. Stough: January 20, 2005 This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On January 18, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit eight attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 11.3 feet (to building), reductions to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 8.52 feet (to the northeast corner of the ground floor of the building), from 20 feet to 5.52 feet (to ground floor stoop) and from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to second through fourth floor balconies), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 37 feet (to roof deck) with an additional four feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 12.67 feet for a roof top pavilion (from roof deck) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right -of -way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C, (2) Transfer of Development Rights for one dwelling unit from 200 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4 -1403 (TDR2004- 08009) and (3) Preliminary Plat approval for eight townhome lots (PLT2004- 00004). The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the applications with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 803.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3 -913; 3. The proposal is in compliance with Beach by Design; and 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 200 Brightwater Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 200 Brightwater Drive due to the transfer of BRIAN,J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR- COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER BILI. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE; ACTION EMPLOYER" t, January 20, 2005 Stough — Page Two development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (200 Brightwater.Drive) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That either a subdivision plat or a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That all plans indicate a 12 -foot radius canopy for the 12 -inch DBH oak tree to the rear of the property prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That all proposed utilities (from the right -of -way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s) -of -way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 6. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; and 7. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4 -407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (January 18, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4 -502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on February 1, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727 - 5624504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts /planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! X cerely *Aki Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)I/nactive or Finished Applications ftinsettia 605 Poinsettia Place (7) - Approveditinsettia 605 Development Order. doc ( Exist. Storm M.H. (l Top 4.60 In v: 2.68 �� ST Exist. 8" Storm Sewer 11 'Approx. Location Top 4.12 In U 2.32 �. 36 L.F. - 12 "- ADS ® 0.507. 10 L.F. - 8" Y ADS (N -12) Set 1/2" 1. R. _X G® 0.409) PL`S 4821 3� OU7F'ALL CONTROL-- S7RUC7URE AT (727)562-4773. TOP 5.00 11.76' INV. 3.25 CM SEE SHEET 3 �g FOR DETAIL -- 5-0-14Ein �' 11.96' RECORDED DATA „ Q. M. r Florida Department of Transportation standards and specifications. 00 t- NO I.D. C EROSION CONTROL --' BARRIER - Fnd 4x4 CM No l,D, X X OPEN CUT INS7ALLA77ON PA VEMENT REMOVAL & REPLACEMENT REOU/RED TOP -OF BANK EL. 5.00 807 70M EL. 4.25 LOT 3 N. N X Ell -NOTES. 1. THE CITY OF CLEARWATER WILL PROVIDE WATER TAP, SET THE WATER METER AND A BACKFLOW PREWN77ON DEVICE. OWNER/DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASSOCIATED FEES AND INSTALLA77ON COSTS 2 DUC77LE IRON PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED BE7AFFN ANY TAP AND WATER METER AND BETWEEN ANY TAP AND BACKFLOW DEVICE. AT LEAST ONE JOINT OF DUC77LE IRON PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON 7HE SERWCE SIDE OF ANY 0 0 ' I ` X EXIST. TREE CANOPY it NAIE rL �e KOYM S /TE BENCH MARK PK NAIL IN O A I ICA ACA l T . l G BARRIER (Tn ) V TO STOOP X r�Gj �. _ST_ SIGH/ v1.51&1 /1 Y k , ./,1.... •"• / „ n TRIANGLE Fnd 1 /2 I, R. P LS 1982 Exist. 1 " Gas Main No I.D. " DOUBLE DETECTOR 79:91 'M 79.90'P ! 4 CHECK VAL VE / ASS'Y. X O 4" G V �k'� TREE LEGEND 9.84' 4" DIP FIRE PM = OAK SPRINKLER TO `BLDG. �-4" DIP SEE PLBG. PLANS FOR CON 17NZIA770N 10.03' NOTES RE: EXISTING UTILITIES & DRIVES. B. 1. ALL UTILITY POLE RELOCATIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY I_ tV COMPANIES`AN SHALL ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK AND DRIVE APRON(S) d.; INSTALLATION WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY. THE MINIMUM HORIZONTAL Qy CLEARANCE OF TWO (2) FEET IS REQUIRED FROM EDGE OF SIDEWALK TO ANY LO LO VERTICAL OBSTRUCTION. LOT 13 2. ALL EXISTING UNUSED DRiVE APRON(S) SHALL BE REMOVED IN ,ENTIRETY BY THE CONTRACTOR, AT THE OWNER'S EXPENSE AND THE RiGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE RESTORED WITH SIDEWALK AND SOD AS REQUIRED. 3. FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE INSTALLED '& IN USE PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. /-105 L.F. - / V -SWALE O 15'F'M LEI W c a In L 0 C3 o' �,� CD Q) dc, N' AT (727)562-4773. X Vim) Uu) CM CONCRETE MONUMENT �g PLAT DATA -- 5-0-14Ein �' _ _ _- - _ _ RECORDED DATA „ 1. All construction, materials and workmanship shall be in accordance with the latest City of Clearwater and M. Fnd 1/2" I.R. Florida Department of Transportation standards and specifications. IRON ROD NO I.D. 2. The indicated locations of underground utilities, structures and facilities are approximate only and reflect R/R SPK RAILROAD SPIKE the best information available from surveys and records and have not been field verified. The contractor FOUND N & D shall verify the actual locations and elevations prior to proceeding with any construction activity which UP X 0� may affect such utilities. Contractor shall call "SUNSHINE STATE -ONE CALL" 1 -800- 432- 4770 at least CORNER IDENTIFICATION CONC 48 hours in advance of start of construction. CNR COULD NOT READ I.D. 3. All construction staking for site improvements as shown hereon shall be performed by a State of Florida CHAIN LINK FENCE W.F. Professional Land Surveyor. P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING 4. All backfill over any pipe (storm sewer, sanitary sewer, waterlines, etc.) that is to be placed under LIGHT POLE C.B. roadways or within the embankment of roadways, shall be compacted in accordance with Florida Department RAD RADIUS of Transportation Specifications, Section 125.8.3, latest edition. This particular section specifies compaction RIGHT -OF -WAY CHID to 100% of the maximum density as determined by AASHTO T -99. SRD : STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT D.O.T. 5. Mandatory minimum clearance between water main and any sanitary or storm sewer line shall be 18" vertical C.A. CENTRAL ANGLE (crossing) and 10' horizontal (parallel). UTILITY POLE GUY WIRE WM 6. Unless otherwise claimed by the owner, materials interfering with construction, including all abandoned UV UTILITY VALVE utility lines, pipes, structures and other subterranean objects to be removed, shall be disposed off -site by EXISTING TREE the contractor. TO BE REMOVED 7. All areas of exposed or disturbed earth resulting from construction activities shall be solid sodded unless otherwise directed by the construction documents. 8. Contractor shall provide all sheeting, shoring and bracing required to protect adjacent structures or to minimize trench width. Where a separate pay item is not provided, the cost of all sheeting, shoring and bracing shall be included in the contract price for the item of work for which sheeting, shoring and bracing is required. 9. All existing and proposed utility and storm sewer structures whose tops will be exposed within unpaved areas subject to vehicular, bicycle or pedestrian traffic shall be adjusted so that the top surface of the covers and frames are no more than one Inch above finished grade. Where sodding is applied, LOT 1 finished grade shall be to the top of the turf after the sod is firmly placed. 10. During construction, contractor shall furnish, Install and maintain oil necessary traffic control and safety devices in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation "Manucl on Uniform- Traffic Control Devices" ( MUTCD) and the current Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) "Roadway and Traffic Design Standards ". All proposed traffic control devices such as signs, markings and other-devices as indicated on the plans shall be in accordance with MUTCD and FDOT "Roadway and Traffic Design Standards ". 11. After completion of construction and final acceptance; by owner and agencies having jurisdiction, contractor shall remove and dispose of all erosion and siltation control devices, including but not limited to, silt barriers, hay bales,_ etc. 12. Contractor shall coordinate all work with utility companies in order to prevent damage to existing utility lines and the making of adjustments to some, if required. 13. Fire hydrant, gate valve and blow -off valve assemblies shall consist of all pipe, valves, tees, fittings and any and ail other appurtenances comprising a complete, working unit. 14. Adjusting manhole tops to match grade and slope of the finished paving shall be included in the contract unit price for the manhole, payment of which will constitute full compensation for the construction and completion of the manhole, and no additional payment will be allowed or made for adjusting manhole tops. 15. The joint deflection method shall be used where prcctical in lieu of installing bends. 16. All sanitary sewer gravity pipe shall be PVC- SDR35, unless otherwise noted. 17. All water pipe larger than 2' diameter shall be Cement -lined Ductile iron Pipe, Pressure Class 350 and shall conform to ANSI /AWWA C151/A21.51 and all water pipe 2" diameter and smaller shall be PVC and conform to ASTM 2241, Class 200 or Polyethylene (PE) Tubing and conform to ASTM D2737, SDR9 as indicated hereon. 18. All storm drainage pipe shall be RCP -ASTM C76 for circular pipe and ASTM C507 for elliptical pipe. Elliptical pipe shall be wrapped with MIRAFI 140N filter fabric or approved equivalent. Ciruclor pipe under pavement, drives and sidewalks shall also be wrapped with MIRAFl 14ON filter fabric or approved equivalent. 19. Contractor shall be responsible for conducting hydrostatic pressure test(s) on the domestic water and fire line system. Each system shall be tested at 200 psi (min.) for a duration of two (2) hours and no leakage is allowed from either system. 20. Contractor shoal be responsible for documenting and maintaining as -built information which shall be recorded as construction progresses or, at the completion of appropriate construction interval(s), and shall be responsible for providing all applicable data obtained to the Owner for the purpose of preparing final as -built (record) drawings. All as -built data shall be collected by a State of Florida Professional Land Surveyor whose services are engaged by the contractor. 21. Contractor shall be responsible for furnishing the appropriate number, of shop drawings for review by the Owner and Engineer prior to the ordering or fcbrication of those items requiring review. Shop drawings will be required for the following items: - Sanitary sewer pipe, storm drainage pipe and water main pipe including certificate of manufacture - Fire hydrants - Valves, fittings and related appurtenances - Precast manholes and inlets CONSULTING o r 1807 PEPPERTREE DRIVE OLDSMAR, FLORIDA ... a4 I E. DESIGN BY. ° LG DATE: 4/20/04 LEGEND D DESCRIPTION CM CONCRETE MONUMENT P. PLAT DATA PP . PINCH PIPE R. RECORDED DATA OEP - OPEN END PIPE M. MEASURED IR IRON ROD C. CALCULATED R/R SPK RAILROAD SPIKE FND FOUND N & D NAIL & DISK UP UTILITY POLE I.D. CORNER IDENTIFICATION CONC CONCRETE CNR COULD NOT READ I.D. CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE W.F. WOOD FENCE P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING LP LIGHT POLE C.B. CHORD BEARING RAD RADIUS R/W RIGHT -OF -WAY CHID CHORD DISTANCE SRD : STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT D.O.T. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION C.A. CENTRAL ANGLE GW UTILITY POLE GUY WIRE WM WATER METER UV UTILITY VALVE EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED CONSULTING o r 1807 PEPPERTREE DRIVE OLDSMAR, FLORIDA ... a4 I E. DESIGN BY. ° LG DATE: 4/20/04 EXISTING ZONING CLASSIFICATION: T (CITY OF CLEARWATER) EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATION: RESORT FACILITY SCALE: 1 " =10' TOTAL LOT AREA = 11,375 S.F. = 0.26 AC. REVIEWED BY: LG FILE: SITE PLAN REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED (MIN. /MAX.) GROSS LOT AREA 11,375 S.F. 11,375 S.F. 5,000 - 10,000 S.F. - BUILDING COVERAGE 2,821 S.F. 5,426 S.F. N/A - PAVING & WALKS 902 S.F. 1,695 S.F. 5,149 S.F. (MAX.) -OPEN AREAS 7,652 S.F. 4,254 S.F. 569 S.F. (MIN.) - DENSITY 7.7 UNITS /AC. 31 UNITS /AC. ** 30 UNITS /AC. (MAX) SETBACKS - FRONT 10.3' 14.10' BUILDING) O' -15'* - SIDE 4.9' 10' MIN.) 0' -10'* - REAR 19.7' 8.52' MN.) 10' -20'* BUILDING HEIGHT N/A 35' 35' -100' HEIGHT OF ROOF DECK N/A 29.33' * ** N/A FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) 0.25 0.48 N/A IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (ISR) 0.33 0.63 0.95 (MAX.) PARKING REQUIRED 1.5 SPACES /DWELLING UNIT = 8 UNITS X 1.5 = 12 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED = 16 SPACES * - BASED ON FLEXIBLE,DEVELOPME,NTMRITERiA (LEVEL TWO) ** - BASEDR ON 8 U�11TS /t1.26EA`C p` =` 3a:8 OMITS /AC. * ** - AS MEASURED °'FROM IFEMA EL. ILODa(UGVD) NOTE: THREE(3) °EXISTING DWELLING UNITS TO BE DEMOLISHED. __ _ 11' a ' ; CONSULTING o r 1807 PEPPERTREE DRIVE OLDSMAR, FLORIDA ... a4 I E. DESIGN BY. ° LG DATE: 4/20/04 PROJECT NO. 04 -09 DRAWN BY: DA SCALE: 1 " =10' SHEET N0. OF REVIEWED BY: LG FILE: SITE PLAN _ Ex1s t. Storm M.H. Top 4.60 In v 2.68 �0 =ST --X- -- =_9 Exist. 8" Storm Sewer (Approx. Location) Gk LEGEND LG D 7 Inv 292 �. P. _ Ex1s t. Storm M.H. Top 4.60 In v 2.68 �0 =ST --X- -- =_9 Exist. 8" Storm Sewer (Approx. Location) yo 9t 9 LOT 10 Q X lFnd 4x4 CM �J No I,D, X I LOT 4 ST- X x LOT 3 r ST DcQ ASPHALT PA VEMENT PREPARED FOR: �— FLORENCE 1 REV. PER CITY REVIEW REV. PER CITY REVIEW 256 PRESIDENT M. DUNEDIN, FLORIDA 34698 �:!Q X 1 SITE BENCH Q� MARK --ST PK NAIL IN PA VEMENT EL =3.61 NA VD DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY (TYP.) POINSETTIA PARK PLACE CLEARWATER BEACH, r ♦ 337 • �1 ^ �p W Fnd 1/2" I.R. PLS 1982 / X _ LOT 13 ® 15 PM g W w s r u') u) 00 ip n OQ 00 00 00 cn g x Fnd 1/2" I.R. No C.D. X Q1 I LOT 1 Ck� S T Exist. 15" Storm Sewer (Approx L acction) —� �!� — SS Exist. 8" Storm Sewer (Approx Location) W Exist. 8" Wcter 1 (Aporox Location) C Fnd 1/2" I.R. G Exist. 1 " Gas Main No I.D. 79.91 'M 79.90'P CONSULTING PLANNINC 1807 PEPPERTREE DRIVE OLDSMAR, FLORIDA EB I 0007622 PHONE: FAX: (813)855-1572 Top 4.12 LEGEND LG D DESCRIPTION Inv 292 �. P. PLAT DATA PP PINCH PIPE R. RECORDED DATA OEP OPEN END PIPE M. �-- W IRON ROD C. Set 1/2" I.R. RAILROAD SPIKE FND PLS 4821; 15 _X G UTILITY POLE I.D. CORNER IDENTIFICATION CONC CONCRETE CNR 6 CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE \ WOOD FENCE yo 9t 9 LOT 10 Q X lFnd 4x4 CM �J No I,D, X I LOT 4 ST- X x LOT 3 r ST DcQ ASPHALT PA VEMENT PREPARED FOR: �— FLORENCE 1 REV. PER CITY REVIEW REV. PER CITY REVIEW 256 PRESIDENT M. DUNEDIN, FLORIDA 34698 �:!Q X 1 SITE BENCH Q� MARK --ST PK NAIL IN PA VEMENT EL =3.61 NA VD DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY (TYP.) POINSETTIA PARK PLACE CLEARWATER BEACH, r ♦ 337 • �1 ^ �p W Fnd 1/2" I.R. PLS 1982 / X _ LOT 13 ® 15 PM g W w s r u') u) 00 ip n OQ 00 00 00 cn g x Fnd 1/2" I.R. No C.D. X Q1 I LOT 1 Ck� S T Exist. 15" Storm Sewer (Approx L acction) —� �!� — SS Exist. 8" Storm Sewer (Approx Location) W Exist. 8" Wcter 1 (Aporox Location) C Fnd 1/2" I.R. G Exist. 1 " Gas Main No I.D. 79.91 'M 79.90'P CONSULTING PLANNINC 1807 PEPPERTREE DRIVE OLDSMAR, FLORIDA EB I 0007622 PHONE: FAX: (813)855-1572 TREE LEGEND K = OAK PM = PALM '✓ a ass DEC 3 0 2004 CITY OF CLEA'Rlk,`�UVER NOTE THS PLAN TO BE USED FOR TABULATION OF DRAINAGE • 1 DESIGN BY: DATE: LEGEND LG D DESCRIPTION CM CONCRETE MONUMENT P. PLAT DATA PP PINCH PIPE R. RECORDED DATA OEP OPEN END PIPE M. MEASURED IR IRON ROD C. CALCULATED R/R SPK RAILROAD SPIKE FND FOUND N & D NAIL & DISK UP UTILITY POLE I.D. CORNER IDENTIFICATION CONC CONCRETE CNR COULD NOT READ B.D. CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE W.F. WOOD FENCE P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING LP LIGHT POLE C.B. CHORD BEARING RAD RADIUS R/W RIGHT —OF —WAY CND CHORD DISTANCE SRD STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT D.O.T. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION C.A. CENTRAL ANGLE GW UTILITY POLE GUY WIRE WM WATER METER UV UTILITY VALVE EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE LEGEND K = OAK PM = PALM '✓ a ass DEC 3 0 2004 CITY OF CLEA'Rlk,`�UVER NOTE THS PLAN TO BE USED FOR TABULATION OF DRAINAGE • 1 DESIGN BY: DATE: PROJECT NO. LG 4/20/04 DRAWN BY: SCALE: 04 -09 DA 1 " =10' SHEET NO. EVIEWED BY: FILE: LG DRAINAGE PLAN OF A /lim /num Skimine, /.001 --•_. /•}f nAl,'t -- AI)C }rnri�•; "J rain "RCP vtfa// Pipe 2 12/6/04 1 7/28/04 PLAN 5i„ Top E/. 5. 00 F-1 I- DETENTION - r S/&& /- POND Grafe 6Ye/r Aluminum Skimmer Tj 112Y. 4.50 /B" Cs POND BOTTOfl EL. 4.25 4'Z ,r 2' 9/,r 6'f THlC' CONG. PAD (RE /NF. :25 B 25 .3 /6 6 # /O //O { WC7 CENTERED SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ® SLOPE TO MATCH EXIST. GRADE @ w PROPERTY LINE M.E. NORTH OR EAST PROPERTY LINE SLOPE TO MATCH EXIST. GRADE ® E Yerdrain Eye Bohs Per —1-mr lodex 201 2" T.O.B. EL.S.Gri �-- Basin Side S /ope !2"AOS F 0&71fo!/ P /pe W X ALONG' FACE OF STRUCTURE #4 Bars r- �a- �wa�i -a -rt GRATE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT TYPE C Sr`raighf Bars 2`;r �" Rer`icu /rae Bars IP-,re Ba/X/S /'V%r :v Approx. HI&Ighr` /OD LL15: EXISTING _ W +T +12" SEE NOTE 6 6" TO 36" PAVEMENT 38" TO 84" 18" 86" TO 144" 24" SURFACE 6" 3' -6" 6 MINIMUM #3 at 12" E.W. Standard 4.1'- 6' 3' -6" 1"=1 01 BRUSH TACK COAT, BASE THICKNESS 91, ASPHALT PATCH 16" MAY BE SUBSTITUTED T MINIMUM 10' 4' EACH EDGE Q S SURFACE REPL. 24" 36" • ;`'� �:x i • 1. •.W "t't 1 S' V '. 'r•t MINIMUM 4 f. Jgr4.�• S•• ..,. •T• ;t,N,o. ;tit .'•�.•, .�.. ,. ' ;•. • :•.t •' .'4. •f••,; • 1.�•.{•f'• 30" �., ,1. I MINIMUM � EXISTING BASE o Z SPRAY ON PRIME COAT 11 /2T W 1 /2T REPLACEMENT BASE OD BACK SLOPE AS REQUIRED X X TRENCH BACKFILL, SEE NOTE 3 PIPE OR CONDUIT OD +2X SEE NOTE 6 PIPE OD X UP TO 5" SEE NOTE 6 6" TO 36" 8" 38" TO 84" 18" 86" TO 144" 24" S C H E D U L E A ITEM ALLEY /DRIVE STD, ROAD HEAVY DUTY ROAD REMARKS A ASPH. THICKNESS 1" 1" 2 -1/4" 3' -6" 24" Max MINIMUM #3 at 12" E.W. Standard 4.1'- 6' 3' -6" 1"=1 01 6' Max BASE THICKNESS 91, 12" 16" MAY BE SUBSTITUTED T MINIMUM 10' 4' 48" Max WITH ASPHALT S SURFACE REPL. 24" 36" 36" 1 S' 48" Max MINIMUM 1 #5 at 10" E.W. D DEPTH (COVER) 30" 30" 36" i I MINIMUM R =1 xx 5" b ROADWAY - 4 (D e #4 REBAR a 2 1/2 _ (TYP. ) NOTES: 1. WHEN REMOVING EXISTING CURB, THE CURB SHALL BE SAW CUT AT THE NEAREST CONSTRUCTION JOINT AND A FULL SECTION OF CURB REPLACED. 2. INSTALL EXPANSION JOINTS AT 50' INTERVALS, STRUCK CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10' INTERVALS. CONC. UPRIGHT CURB DETAIL N.T.S. ` * DRAINAGE CONSULTING + PLANNING PARK PLACE 605 POINSETTIA AVENUE 1807 PEPPERTREE DRIVE 33767 OLDSMAR, FLORIDA 34677 cV RING - HALF PLAN Za" RING - SECTION NOTES 1. Where roadway base is 8" or thicker use 9" ring, all other cases 7" ring is permissible. 2. Ring And Cover shall U.S. Foundry 150 -G or approved equivalent. 3. Perforated covers, when required shall be similar to solid covers. Pick Hole Lo 1 -1 /4" � � r 4 Required RW D ❑ S T O R M T S E W E R❑ Non Skid Required p p p p ❑ Pattern Required ❑F L ❑ SOLID COVER 22 -3/4" 1� Machined Surface SOLID COVER SECTION I L,11 V Clay Or Cement Varies Brick Masonry } m Bottom Of s Corbel ~� - U Q- ar 8 "D" Min. 81> Or To Suit Pipe 12" 12" rr-"Exx tom °' fp, a' '' d' :' p',• a :`t .w. .D; •q. '4• .Q uG" SECTION A -A NOTES 1. All concrete to be 3000 p.s.i. STORM SEWER N.T.S. E8 0007622 Cs PHONE: (813)855 -3510 LEO L. FAX: (813)855 -1572 s Ik `s A B C D E F G Shallow 0'- 4' 2' -6" 4/20/04 4' Max 3' -6" 24" Max 8" #3 at 12" E.W. Standard 4.1'- 6' 3' -6" 1"=1 01 6' Max 4' 30" Max 8" #5 at 10" E.W. Deep 6.1'- 10' 3' -6" 7' 10' 4' 48" Max 12" #5 at 10" E.W. Deep 10.1'- 14' 3' -6" 7' 1 14' 1 S' 48" Max 12" 1 #5 at 10" E.W. NOTES 1. All concrete to be 3000 p.s.i. STORM SEWER N.T.S. E8 0007622 Cs PHONE: (813)855 -3510 LEO L. FAX: (813)855 -1572 s Ik `s 1 a LG DETAILS ., „K t^9 •' l3'ti:: win DESIGN BY: D DATE: P PROJECT NO. LG 4 4/20/04 DRAWN BY: S SCALE: 0 04-09 DA 1 1"=1 01 SHEET NO. s Q R REVIEWED BY: F FILE: OF CV I-a- -- 9 5/8" ---�{ 10 5/8" _—A or 8 "- 1/8 Bend -)l ))) ,I P Sewer Main CLEAN OU T DETAIL THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: 1. BEND — INLET AND OUTLET 2. TEE — ALL BRANCHES 3. OFFSETS — INLET AND OUTLET 4. CAPS 5. PLUGS 6. DEAD ENDS 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS Restraining Gasket (Typ.) L Thrust Restraint (Typ.) ON ALL TEES, A MINIMUM OF 5' SHALL BE RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG. L = MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (ft.) * = CONTACT ENGINEER FOR VALUES FIGURES BASED ON 30" BURY DEPTH, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE FIGURES DON'T APPLY TO POLY WRAPPED PIPE NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT ON SLIPJOINT DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE U.S. PIPE FIELD LOCK GASKETS FOR TYTON JOINT PIPE or AMERICAN FAST —GRIP GASKETS FOB. AMERICAN FASTITE PIPE. THRUST RESTRAINT ON DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS`SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE USE OF MEGALUG RETAINERS AND MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS. EROSION *UCTILE IRON PIPE RESTRAINT SITE PREPARATION, TURBIDITY, AND 1. It shall be the responsibility of oil site, building and utility contractors to be familiar with all applicable regulatory agency permits, specific land development requirements, permit compliance requirements, and permit inspection procedures of the various regulatory agencies and the project design engineer. 2. All contractors must establish construction methodology and sequencing of operations to ensure compliance with all environmental regulatory agency permits and Section 62 -302, F.A.C. Water Quality Standards. 3. Prior to any site clearing, all wetiond areas, wetland /upland buffers, significant upland wildlife habitat, and trees designated to remain undisturbed shall be protected as required by County, State, and Federal ordinances, and details found in these plans. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to maintain these areas in their pre — construction condition. 4. All contractors must provide turbidity and erosion controls /sedimentation barriers (hay bales or siltation curtain) to prevent siltation onto /into adjacent property, streets, storm sewers, water bodies, critical upland habitat areas, and wetlands. In addition, contractors shall place straw, mulch, or other suitable material to properly stabilize areas where construction related traffic is to enter and exit the project site. If, in the opinion of the project engineer and /or local authorities, excessive quantities of earth have been transported off —site by either natural or by vehicular traffic, the contractor must remove the earth to the satisfaction of the project engineer and /or local authorities. 5. Prior to commencement of any construction activities, erosion controls and turbidity barriers must be installed to ensure compliance with items 1 — 3, above. 6. All turbidity and erosion controls shall be secured and properly maintained during construction, and shall remain in place until any erosion or depositional sediments have been properly stabilized or any generated turbidity has subsided. 7. All site development contractors shall inspect turbidity and erosion controls daily. Contractors shall immediately repair any deficiencies. 8. During construction in and adjacent to wetlands, waters of the state, wetland upland buffers, and designated critical upland habitat, all areas of exposed soils shall be stabilized with an appropriate ground cover within 72 hours of obtaining final grade. 9. All site, building and utility contractors shall clear and grub those portions of the site necessary for their respective construction activities. THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: 1. BEND — INLET AND OUTLET 2. TEE OUTLET BRANCH 3. OFFSETS — INLET AND OUTLET 4. CAPS 5. PLUGS 6. DEAD ENDS 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS L -I Megalug Restrainer (Typ.) Ebba 1500 Series (Typ.) ON ALL TEES, A MININUM OF 5' SHALL 13E RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG L = MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (ft.) FIGURES BASED ON 30" DEPTH BURY, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE. 8" PVC MAXIMUM SIZE USED IN SYSTEM a� c When Valve Occur set Base on 10 -1 c I CV In C 2 0 L as 0 c� 0 as Water Main Mech. Joint Valve Restraining Joint TYPICAL VALVE SETTING NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND VALVES SHALL BE N.T.S. BY USE OF EBBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS. THRUST RESTRAINT BETWEEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA IRON SERIES 1500 RESTRAINERS. Flow -- SEDIMENT TRAP ALTERNATE RECOMMENDED w w w TOE —IN TOE —IN PREASSEMBLED SILT FENCE 2 "x2" WOOD STAKES WIRE OR NYLON (PREFERRED) 2 PER BALE BOUND BALES .LOW EXISTING GRADE EROSION AND SOIL CONTROL A. PROTECTION OF EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEMS: During construction, all storm sewer inlets in the vicinity of the 12' (MIN.) project shall be protected by sediment traps such m secured SECTION hay bales, sod, stone, etc., which shall be maintained and modified as required by construction progress. FLOW 1 FLOW 1 B. SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURES: Sediment basins and traps, f } f perimeter berms, filter fences, berms, sediment barriers, vegetative buffers and other measures intended to trap sediment and /or prevent the transport of sediment into x GYJ waters of the state or neighboring properties shall be installed, constructed or, in the case of vegetative buffers, PLAN DOWNSLOPE protected from disturbance, as a first step in the land alteration process. ANGLE FIRST STAKE Bales butted tightly C. MAINTENANCE: All erosion and siltration control devices TOWARD PREVIOUSLY together shall be checked regularly, especially after each rainfall LAID BALE and will be cleaned out and /or repaired as required. ELEVATION STRAWBALE SILT BARRIER (ALTERNATE) EROSION CONTROL DETAIL N.T.S. Connecting Piece w /integrally cast Mech. Joint Gland on one End -D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint Gland on Other End. Valve and Hydrant Tee w /D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint Gland on Plain End Branch. __- Fire Hydrant Assembly (Typ.) Length Varies (See Note 1) ---- -- Mech. Joint Valve \1 Water Main Water Meter Connection Ford Angle FI °w Valve (Typ.) Top View Approved Backflow Prevention Device Ford Regulator Adaptor 0 -a ok) % I f 1, i TYPICAL SINGLE DEVICE 3/4" and 1" MODELS �7 NOTE: Device must be installed level. APPROVED R.P. DEVICES APPROVED DOUBLE —CHECK VALVES DE1 0 8 00-1, Hersey— Beeco Model FRP II Hersey —Beeco Model FDC Watts Model 909 or 009 Watts Model 709 or 007I Conbraco 40200 Conbraco 40100 py ypq m TYPICAL METER SETS I N.T.S.— MIN ME Q', ;. \" ° 'r > t �� ,_ cg, <u . n' * k1 F, " r�'" fc DESIGN BY: LG VALVE t •� . . SCALE: ..` TEES 1"=10' g ' � °� f:`' LEO tc VE�RtSAts2' £ ,,16971 REVIEWED BY. FILE: 1807 PEPPERTREE DRIVE PHONE: (813)855 -3510 OLDSMAR, FLORIDA 34677 BRANCH MIAMI DETAILS a IIMII • i® a� c When Valve Occur set Base on 10 -1 c I CV In C 2 0 L as 0 c� 0 as Water Main Mech. Joint Valve Restraining Joint TYPICAL VALVE SETTING NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND VALVES SHALL BE N.T.S. BY USE OF EBBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS. THRUST RESTRAINT BETWEEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA IRON SERIES 1500 RESTRAINERS. Flow -- SEDIMENT TRAP ALTERNATE RECOMMENDED w w w TOE —IN TOE —IN PREASSEMBLED SILT FENCE 2 "x2" WOOD STAKES WIRE OR NYLON (PREFERRED) 2 PER BALE BOUND BALES .LOW EXISTING GRADE EROSION AND SOIL CONTROL A. PROTECTION OF EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEMS: During construction, all storm sewer inlets in the vicinity of the 12' (MIN.) project shall be protected by sediment traps such m secured SECTION hay bales, sod, stone, etc., which shall be maintained and modified as required by construction progress. FLOW 1 FLOW 1 B. SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURES: Sediment basins and traps, f } f perimeter berms, filter fences, berms, sediment barriers, vegetative buffers and other measures intended to trap sediment and /or prevent the transport of sediment into x GYJ waters of the state or neighboring properties shall be installed, constructed or, in the case of vegetative buffers, PLAN DOWNSLOPE protected from disturbance, as a first step in the land alteration process. ANGLE FIRST STAKE Bales butted tightly C. MAINTENANCE: All erosion and siltration control devices TOWARD PREVIOUSLY together shall be checked regularly, especially after each rainfall LAID BALE and will be cleaned out and /or repaired as required. ELEVATION STRAWBALE SILT BARRIER (ALTERNATE) EROSION CONTROL DETAIL N.T.S. Connecting Piece w /integrally cast Mech. Joint Gland on one End -D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint Gland on Other End. Valve and Hydrant Tee w /D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint Gland on Plain End Branch. __- Fire Hydrant Assembly (Typ.) Length Varies (See Note 1) ---- -- Mech. Joint Valve \1 Water Main Water Meter Connection Ford Angle FI °w Valve (Typ.) Top View Approved Backflow Prevention Device Ford Regulator Adaptor 0 -a ok) % I f 1, i TYPICAL SINGLE DEVICE 3/4" and 1" MODELS �7 NOTE: Device must be installed level. APPROVED R.P. DEVICES APPROVED DOUBLE —CHECK VALVES DE1 0 8 00-1, Hersey— Beeco Model FRP II Hersey —Beeco Model FDC Watts Model 909 or 009 Watts Model 709 or 007I Conbraco 40200 Conbraco 40100 py ypq m TYPICAL METER SETS I N.T.S.— PROJECT NO. 04 -09 SHEET NO. OF_ INC. Q', ;. \" ° 'r > t �� ,_ cg, <u . n' * k1 F, " r�'" fc DESIGN BY: LG DATE: 4/20 /04 CONSULTING 9 PLANNING EB 0007622 DRAWN BY: SCALE: ..` DA 1"=10' g ' � °� f:`' LEO tc VE�RtSAts2' £ ,,16971 REVIEWED BY. FILE: 1807 PEPPERTREE DRIVE PHONE: (813)855 -3510 OLDSMAR, FLORIDA 34677 FAX: (813)855 -1572 ' .:. LG DETAILS a PROJECT NO. 04 -09 SHEET NO. OF_ ; s+ Materials, Quantity Code Botanical Name 8 ARO Syagrus Romanzoffiana 50 IX Ixora Nora Grant 70 LMM Llrlope Muscari 6.4 LMG Llrlope Muscarl 7 IC ilex cassine 24 NOP Nerium oleander "dwarf pink" 33 POM Podocarpus spp. 4 RE Rhapis excel 5a 24 R Raphiolepis indica 57 VO Viburnum odorati55imum 4 5P 5abal palmetto Common Name Queen Palm Nora Grant Ixora Aztec Grass Giant Llrlope Dahoon holly Dwarf Pink Oleander Podocarpus Lady Palm Indian hawthorn Sweet Viburnum Cabbage Palm Specification 5pacing 10' C.T. Set tree plumb, ®° 3 gal., 24" x 24" 30" O.C. I gal., 12" ht. x 12" spr. 18" O.C. I gal., 12" ht. x 12" spr. 18" 0. C. 10 -1 2' ht. x 4' spr., 2.5" cal. 30 feet o.c. 3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" spr. aid" O.C. 3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" spr. 30" O.C. 10 gal., 42" ht. x 24" spr. 00 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr. 30" O.C. 3 gal., 24" ht. x 24" spr. 30" 0.c. C.T. as noted on plan, min i O' C:T. i . All plant materials shall be Florida #I or better and installed to highest nursery standards. Plants shall be healthy, free of pest and disease. 2. All plants shall be container grown except as noted on plan. 3. All palms and trees shall have straight trunks with no twists, knotting or other defective characteristics. 4. Mulch shall be 100% Pine Bark, installed to a minimum thickness of 2 ". 5. Sod shall be 95% weed free 5t. Augustine "Floratam ", installed with tight joints. G. All dimensions shall be field checked by the Landscape Contractor prior to construction with any discrepancies reported to the Landscape Architect. 7. All materials shall be as specified on the plans. If materials, labor or installation techniques do not adhere to the specifications, they will be rejected by the Landscape Architect with specified materials and installation carried out by the Landscape Contractor at no additional cost. 8. No substitutions of materials or changes to the drawings or specifications shall be made. 9. All required permits are to be provided by the installing contractor unless specifically stated otherwise in the specifications. 10. Contractor Identification signs shall not be allowed on the project. 1 1. Contractor shall be responsible for all items as shown or described on this plan and specifications. 12. All proposed landscape and sod areas containing turf or weeds shall be treated with "Round -up" per manufacturer's specifications. 13. Landscape Contractor shall provide all necessary site preparation required to ready the site for planting as specified. 14. The landscape Contractor shall warranty and guarantee all materials and labor for a period of 90 days for shrubs and groundcover, palms and trees. Warranty and guarantee period shall begin upon date of completion. 15. All repairs and /or replacements shall be made by the Landscape Contractor within 10 working days upon notification of any deficiencies by the owner or their representative. i G. All questions regarding the Landscape Plans and Specifications shall be directed to the Landscape Architect at (727) 787 -2840. r J Shrubs and Trees All trees and shrubs shall be fertilized with "Agnform" 20 -15 -5 planting tablets at time of planting and prior to installation of plant pit backflll. Tablets shall be placed uniformly around the root ball at a depth that is between the middle and bottom of the root ball. I Gallon Container: 3 Gallon Container: 5 Gallon Container: 7 Gallon Container: Trees: I - 21 gram tablet 2 - 21 gram tablets 3 - 21 gram tablets 4 - 21 gram tablets 3 tablets per each 1/2" caliper of trunk Groundcover Areas All groundcover areas shall receive fertilization with "Ozmocote" time release fertilizer per manufacturer's specifications. Native soil �J backfili TREE PLANTING DETAIL 0 Set shrub Set tree plumb, ®° ° ` o a with top of ® ® s ® % 0 rootball 1 112" 0 '® of rootball I" C above finish i grade ° 0 00 N Rubber hose h n 3 d x 0 o grade # 12 gauge 4 Rte: r< • •-x �. Existing native Rill- Yiiulch 5011 12" length red 3" Tree wel 0 r< plastic flag Firnsh grad 4 d tape 2x4 pt stake Existing native Root ball sod Native soil �J backfili TREE PLANTING DETAIL backflll - - ShRUB PLANTING DETAIL i A � d 8 2004 C �• ;r "F �..,� �. i � '� - 0 10, 20' G;<i3 CD ° 00 ® Set shrub o ® ` o a plumb, with top 2" Mulch ® % 0 0 '® of rootball I" C p i above fml5h Finish Grade-, N h n 3 d x 0 o grade Root ball 4 Rte: r< • •-x �. Existing native Native sod 5011 backflll - - ShRUB PLANTING DETAIL i A � d 8 2004 C �• ;r "F �..,� �. i � '� - 0 10, 20' G;<i3 CD o o U CD a U N ci ii ii ® C i N h n 3 d x 0 o M —. Gi O -0 4.1 Nj C U 0 r< — N 4 d 72 � 0 F o N ao "' _a. _c c � tiz L 4J C fi U} A C tv 0 :Ln — �., M 0 O V C U CD a U N ci ii ii ® `° n'0 i N h n 3 d x 0 m o Gi O -0 4.1 Nj C U 0 4 d 72 � 0 F s �9 pq r COPLEY DESTGN ASSOCTATES, TNC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 1.666 Laney Drive Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 Phone 727 787 -2840 Fax 727 785 -4017 Landscape Architecture Site Planning Construction Management 1 JOB NO. 24031 1 t I 1 ' 1 a • i 4 :- i COPLEY DESTGN ASSOCTATES, TNC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 1.666 Laney Drive Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 Phone 727 787 -2840 Fax 727 785 -4017 Landscape Architecture Site Planning Construction Management 1 JOB NO. 24031 1 t I i a • 4 :- i COPLEY DESTGN ASSOCTATES, TNC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 1.666 Laney Drive Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 Phone 727 787 -2840 Fax 727 785 -4017 Landscape Architecture Site Planning Construction Management 1 JOB NO. 24031 1 t I IRRIGATION 5 YTEM REQUIREMENT5 I. 5hallow wells. open surface water bodies, or reclaimed water must be used as a source of Irrigation water. The distribution system for irrigation must not be connected to county or municipal water sources, unless it can be demonstrated that these sources are not available. 2. irrigation systems must utilize low volume design such as low trajectory heads or soaker hoses to provide direct application and low evaporation. Systems that overspray areas that do not require irrigation, such as paved areas will not be acceptable. High Irrigation need areas must not overspray low need areas. 3. High water demand landscape areas such as turf must be served by a separate irrigation zone than low water need areas, such as planter beds, or mulched areas with trees. In no case, shall any planted vegetation area be more than 50' from a water supply hose bib, 4e Automatic irrigation systems must operate by an irrigation controller capable of differentiating between schedules of high and low water demands areas. Controllers must have multiple cycle start capacity and a flexible calendar program able to be set to comply with local or water management district imposed restrictions. 5. Automatic irrlgatlon systems must be equipped with a rain sensor device or switch which will override the irrigation cycle of the sprinkler system when adequate rainfall has occurred. MINE NOMMAK-IIIIIIIIIIIIINWARNEWRAMM I . Repair or Install a new automatic Irrigation system to provide 100% coverage of all landscape areas. 2 Shrub risers shall only be used in hedges or mass plantings. Risers shall not extend more than 2" above the Installed height of the plant. All risers shall be schedule 40 pipe, painted black. In no case shall shrub risers be installed adjacent to walkways, driveways or other areas where they may be damaged. 3. All heads installed in planting areas along walks, drives and parking lots shall be 12" pop -up fixed spray heads. All heads shall be installed with the top of the spray body flush with finish grade. All groundcover areas shall be Irrigated with 12" pop -up fixed spray heads and extensions as required. 4. All sodded areas shall be irrigated with 4" pop -up spray heads or pop -up gear driven heads unless otherwise specified. 5. Pipe, valves and other irrigation equipment may be shown in drives, walks or buildings for clarity only. Install all valves and other equipment in landscape beds for best accessibility and concealment. G. VaIVe5 shall be installed in a manifold within a valve box of sufficient size to service all Valves within the box. Valve box shall be free from any debris which may cover valves. Provide a 3" depth gravel sump at the bottom of the valve pit. 7. All irrigation equipment and installation techniques shall meet federal, state and local codes, regulations and ordmance5. 8. All gear driven heads and all heads along walks, curbs, drlVe5 and parking areas shall be Installed on flexible polyethylene swing ,Joints. 9. Gear driven heads and fixed spray heads shall be installed on separate zoneswhere possible. Precipitation rates and head type should be compatible within each zone. 10. Gear driven heads shall not be Installed in shrub areas or be installed on risers where possible. I I . Controller shall be mounted as shown on plan 12. All 51CCVC5 shall be schedule 40 pipe Installed a minimum of 14" below grade. Sleeves shall be used only to install lateral Irrigation Imes through. Sleeves shall not be used as a method to convey water through the system. 13. Adju5t all heads to provide maximum coverage and efficiency and minimize overthrow. Irrigation heads shall not spray over walks, drlVe5 or any other non - irrigated areas. 14. Equipment Shall be manufactured by, 'Toro ", "Rambird" or "Hunter" or as otherwise stated on the plans. 15. Contractor shall field verify water source to deliver the proper pressure, pounds per square inch (PSI) and water flow, gallons per minute (GPM) as required by the irrigation system. Notify the Landscape Architect if there is any discrepancy. I G. All permits required for m5tallation shall be provided by the contractor. 17. Refer to the Landscape Plans when locating all Irrigation equipment. Allow ample room near irrigation equipment for the proper installation of trees, shrubs and other work shown on drawings to be installed, 18. All wires shall be Installed In wire Sleeves. 19. Contractor shall be responsible for all itCM5 on the plan and irrigation Specification. 20. Contractor shall instruct the owner on the full operation and maintenance of the irrigation system. 21 . Contractor shall be responsible for all final repairs or ad,Ju5tment5 to provide proper coverage to all landscape areas. 22. All 6[ue5tlon5 regarding Irrigation specifications Shall be directed to the Landscape Architect at (727) 787 -2840. PIPE 51ZiNG CHART 0-5 GPM 112" PVC PIPE G- I O GPiv1 3!4" PVC PIPE 11-15 GPM 1 "' PVC PIPE i G -25 GPM I 1/4" PVC PiPE 2G- 35 GPM I 112" PVC PiPE 36 -50 GPM 2" PVC PIPE 50+ GPM 2 1/2' PVC PiPE ®IRRIGATION LEGEND Symbol Specification 0 5F -E3 Toro 5' Radius Full Circle Bubbler 5H -13 Toro 5' Radius Half Circle Bubbler 5Q -13 Toro 5' Radius Quarter Circle Bubbler 5C5T -13 Toro 5' Radius Center Strip Bubbler r] i OF Toro 10' Radius Full Circle 5prayhead El i OTQ Toro I O' Radius Three Quarter Circle Sprayhead I OH Toro I O' Radius Half Circle 5prayhead I OQ Toro I O' Radius Quarter Circle 5prayhead 01 5F Toro 1 5' Radius Full Circle 5prayhead 01 5TQ Toro 15' Radius Three Quarter Circle 5prayhead 015H Toro 15' Radius Half Circle 5prayhead 01 5Q Toro 1 5' RadIU5 Quarter Circle Sprayhead A 15EST Toro End Strip 5prayhead Al 555T Toro Side Strip Sprayhead 015C5T Toro Center Strip 5prayhead O1 -25F Hunter Full Circle Gear Driven Head G GPM Q1 -25ADJ Hunter Adjustable Radius Gear Driven Head 3 GPM 0 1 -25 Hunter Adj./Full Radius Gear Driven Head - Alternate �0 Gate valve p Water Source - Metered water field M verify source location Low volume underground drip irrigation �° o Electric Remote Control Valve. Leal Toro Solid State Dual Program Controller Class I GO P.V.C. Lateral Line (max. flow 5 feet/sec.) •..•..............• Main lane - 5ch. 40 1.5" PVC pipe (max flow 5 feet/sec.) �— Finish Grade aermrnrnerrmm�nrn��rnmrrtn!rme Pop -up fixed spray head 12' minimum de Install sleeves under all paved areas Lateral zone tines 18' minimum depth install sleeves under all paved areas x Mainline piping (schedule 40 FVC) Remote control %alve wires to be installed under mainline secure to mainline at 6 intervals wth waterproof tape wrapped 4 times around pipe at each location IRRIGATION FIFE DEPTH DETAIL P 9 0 467 IMM .m v � c C, ^ o ® M r�z - N c O L '� rn 4J tw 1 aQ N C C ,u v � p O- a ICI I -Imi 1 1 1 1 1 1 Z ao 3 e m r' v w U (U u LL_ M - �, m O E i A = _°� i �arsc �' d 3 m a m J.5 0., 0 y ria ®N c U DES o_Q as U s AIRF �0 `i p a 3 �° o cs ik 37 Y� d �W 4 ro i; r' i i A i i s AIRF ro COPLEY DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 1666 Laney Drive Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 Phone 727 787 -2840 Fax 727 785 -4017 Landscape Architecture Site Planning Construction Management 11 JOB NO. 24031 10 1 r' i i A COPLEY DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 1666 Laney Drive Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 Phone 727 787 -2840 Fax 727 785 -4017 Landscape Architecture Site Planning Construction Management 11 JOB NO. 24031 10 ELEVATION 11 WHITE PVC BALUSTERS 01 2 1 &7i moll, 1 607-2 607-1 9 9 F-91 mpl".0 CONG 13AFZF\EL TILE 's MONIEKLIFETILE "BUTTERCUP" BLEND (TYf) 'A ifftiii pi nni Fin Pmm-w-w=-ml" lii[Mill�iii Man= {] �- i l t i'��t� t�i��l I1 � t t i i � t i t�t�t�l .r 1 �� IIl�illlL; ' =— T•P • ROOF CO/FR SHEET / ELP/AllON5 A-1 1/8"= i' -o" SQUARE [FaG7L%GE MIDPOINT TYFE A TYPE 13 GRw N01 5-rQF-.Iyll UTILITY rLAN 13UILPING 5,544 5F 5,797 5F GROSS AREA 29,564 5F 2,227 5F 2,579 5F CONDITIONED AREA 15,424 5F 555 5F 659 5F GARAGE AREA 4,905 5F 202 5F 202 5F BALCONIES & 1,616 5F PARAPET COVV ENTRY 527 5F 577 5F ROOFTOP' PECK 4,416 5F AND /OR COYD AREA ELEVATION 11 WHITE PVC BALUSTERS 01 2 1 &7i moll, 1 607-2 607-1 9 9 F-91 mpl".0 CONG 13AFZF\EL TILE 's MONIEKLIFETILE "BUTTERCUP" BLEND (TYf) 'A ifftiii pi nni Fin Pmm-w-w=-ml" lii[Mill�iii Man= {] �- i l t i'��t� t�i��l I1 � t t i i � t i t�t�t�l .r 1 �� IIl�illlL; ' =— T•P • ROOF CO/FR SHEET / ELP/AllON5 A-1 FO OF PLAN I ?I AL Ut,111'PLANS L-1 LANDSCArE rLAN MIDPOINT IFFIGA-11ON ?LAN 1 OF 5 GRw N01 5-rQF-.Iyll UTILITY rLAN 2 OF 5 PRAL-NAGE AREA PLAN 5OF5 DEMOL111ON ?LAN 4 OF 5 FA M51 S-FORVI DRAINAGE DETAILS 5 OF WATE W 55EW1 MISC SITE DETAILS PRELIMINARY ?LAT SURYEY PARAPET ROOF DECK 3RD FLOOR mwmw mommat ,01 •�-s it 2ND�LOOR 9� 1ST FLOOR NAVD 11.0 o'= NAVD 6. REAR (EAST) ELEVATION I G I NA L D E- C 08 2004 10 TNT C[jc L"i- J ee� Is, CC�-1. CO/FR SHEET / ELP/AllON5 A-1 FO OF PLAN I ?I AL Ut,111'PLANS L-1 LANDSCArE rLAN IRA IFFIGA-11ON ?LAN 1 OF 5 GRw N01 5-rQF-.Iyll UTILITY rLAN 2 OF 5 PRAL-NAGE AREA PLAN 5OF5 DEMOL111ON ?LAN 4 OF 5 FA M51 S-FORVI DRAINAGE DETAILS 5 OF WATE W 55EW1 MISC SITE DETAILS PRELIMINARY ?LAT SURYEY REAR (EAST) ELEVATION I G I NA L D E- C 08 2004 10 TNT C[jc L"i- J ee� Is, CC�-1. TYPE A 7r PM TYPF A TY D P R G3a000[F polaCJ 1/8 1 ` -O" TYPE A TYPE B TYPE A 2 D FLOiJR F'�A(N v - - - - - - - --- 4 ho m em Rh, I 1011 F; I M 10111*1 Rh, -4 ON'.- 70, -l- ii --m M% "N DEC 3 0 2004 pLANNIi'miG D"WEPAIt-IMIENT Cl-ly 0,1-. cLu RMNAfER OFFIT IE O.H. P.) A -1. M M 'IQ, i5 9J 'P Xt, 2 LOT 11 00 LOT 10 a Z 0 i I iill9ii imilimiffill Eu� ud Ze T. Caudell, P.L.S. # 48fl E.T. C udell & Associates, Inc. LB ff"6 C Not Valid unless embossed with signing Surveyor'S Seat V'� J04009) L E G E N 0 D czDalprm CU CoNa= WSA= P. PLAT DATA rp M.CHMME SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH RANGE 15 EAST MOOMM DATA CEP OPEN W LXASU;= THE SURVEY AS DEPICTED HEREON- IS, NOT 9M RM M CALCMATED SFK :1 RAUWAD WCE COVERED BY PRbFESSION'AL LIABILITY INSURANCE FCUM 0 KAL 6 = Fn d 11r M uram POLE LD6 COMM E0(rJXATM OCHO comaim CM No UX CLF CHAN UFX RNM IM U= rENCE P.0a Wfr OF CEM=12 LP LKHT Paz BOUNDARY SURVEY ciam M_= RAD RADWS nMff --W-w_kY CHD MUM QWANM STATE MAD DEPARMW IL&T. DWARTLENT CF TAMSPMtTAT= C.A. DESCRIP11OINi: UTUTY PCLE GUY =M TU VAIM MIM UV UrAnY VALVE TREE LEGEND K = OAK Lots 11 and 12, A REPLAT OF BLOCKS 80 AND 81 OF UNIT 5, MANDALAY a c or to the plot thereof as recorded In Plat Book 24, Pdge'80, A 0 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. LOT 1J LOT 1 A,00 AO A. r 4 . S8957'05"E 5977P I Fnd 1,12' S89057'05"E 59.42'M GENERAL NOTES: 3 of ,=2 - A0 A- PI This survey has been prepared without the benefit of Title Commitment 'q- J Tnd 11r I.R. Subject to additional easements, restrictions or other matters affecting 21.6 flo M the subject property, recorded in the Public Records of this County, not hereon. ASPH&T DRIVEWAY shown GRAPHIC SCAM Bearings shown hereon cre reference to West boundary line, S1 TE BENCH 20 0 CD 2D 40 MARK as rao No under ground improvements have been located or shown hereon. PK NAIL IN One Story PA VEMEN T Mosonary Duplex The description shown hereon has been established from Plat data. EL = 3.61 NA VD 10.0 'k"Ato I imh 20 ft �O Elevations shown hereon are referenced to City of Clearwater. Vertical Cpvored 0i LOT 12 Datum, Bench Mark H-2. City data is referenced to NGVD 1929 datum. A'Ag 147 Conversion to NA VD 1988 datum is —0.86, established by Vertcon (NGS) 114 Conversion by Longitude & Latitude position. Elevations shown have been Lowest ished EleyG 1 Ln LOT 2 converted to NAVD 1988 to comply with the revised FEMA data. 0- -Floor 4.57 NA 5 0 0 0 1 '0 5.5 J NG 40 4.0 (A L4 -P- This survey is for the sole use of those listed in the certification as Ludi ao shown hereon, any use by any others than listed is at their sole risk of to c OD l� any liablity matters insured by the re—use of this survey. This survey is 'S rn rn non -- transferable and is void if used by others, 0 (C) 00 BOUNDARY NOTICE: (D 40 &_ A-30 The boundary as depicted hereon has been established by a field survey v— 605 tE of existing monumentation and the description as provided. The boundary ASPHAL 7 position shown is, in the best of my knowledge and belief, in my opinion, PA VRIEN 7' 274 the location based on the abovementioned data. M M 'IQ, i5 9J 'P Xt, 2 LOT 11 00 LOT 10 a Z 0 i I iill9ii imilimiffill Eu� ud Ze T. Caudell, P.L.S. # 48fl E.T. C udell & Associates, Inc. LB ff"6 C Not Valid unless embossed with signing Surveyor'S Seat V'� J04009) L E G E N 0 D czDalprm CU CoNa= WSA= P. PLAT DATA rp M.CHMME P_ MOOMM DATA CEP OPEN W LXASU;= R 9M RM M CALCMATED SFK :1 RAUWAD WCE no FCUM 0 KAL 6 = UP uram POLE LD6 COMM E0(rJXATM OCHO comaim CM W.LD NDT READ LM CLF CHAN UFX RNM IM U= rENCE P.0a Wfr OF CEM=12 LP LKHT Paz ciam M_= RAD RADWS nMff --W-w_kY CHD MUM QWANM STATE MAD DEPARMW IL&T. DWARTLENT CF TAMSPMtTAT= C.A. CDM?AL A.31E UTUTY PCLE GUY =M TU VAIM MIM UV UrAnY VALVE TREE LEGEND K = OAK PM = PALN M M 'IQ, i5 9J 'P Xt, 2 LOT 11 00 LOT 10 a Z 0 i I iill9ii imilimiffill Eu� ud Ze T. Caudell, P.L.S. # 48fl E.T. C udell & Associates, Inc. LB ff"6 C Not Valid unless embossed with signing Surveyor'S Seat V'� J04009) m� I I° I i I I I I P l I I I I 1 1 I { f I I f I I I t r )Ij j }$ Z I }I I I I I I w m,I 4 I I I I I I I I f jt 1 gI I j# {f 1 i I I I I .. II 3 I v'. I I I -- __..- .._._ - - - ----- 0 LOTS 11 AND 12, A REPLAT OF BLOCKS 80 AND 81 OF UNIT 5, MANDALAY OR LEGEND: SUBDIVISION MANDALAY, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED BEING A REPEAT OF LOTS 11 AND 12 OF A REPALT OF BLOCKS 80 AND 81 OF UNIT 5 MANDALAY SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 24, PAGE 80 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. 0 LOTS 11 AND 12, A REPLAT OF BLOCKS 80 AND 81 OF UNIT 5, MANDALAY OR LEGEND: SUBDIVISION MANDALAY, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED C.] DENOTES A SET 4 "x 4" PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT IN PLAT BOOK 24, PAGE 80 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, GRAPHIC SCALE MONUMENT (PRM 4821) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: plat examined and that it 20 BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO: complies with all the requirements of the Statutes of Florida 0 20 40 pertaining to maps and plats and that this plat has been filed for O LOT CORNERS — 1/2" IRON ROD OR NAIL & CAP (PLS 4821) COMMENCE AT THE EXISTING PLATTED PRM AS SHOWN N THE WEST LINE THE WEST R/W LINE OF POINSETTIA AVENUE BEING Records of Pinellas County, Florida, this day of - - - -- 2Q - - - -- TO BE SET, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. FLT 13 OF SAID REPLAT OF BLOCKS 0 AND 81 OF UNIT 5, MANDALAY, ASSUMED AT NOO.00'00 "E SUBDIVISION ALSO BEING THE POINT OF CURVATURE FOR THE EASTERLY R/W — RIGHT OF WAY RIGHT—OF—WAY FOR POINSETTIA AVENUE, BEING A 0 FOOT RIGHT —OF— i P.O.B. —POINT OF BEGINNING AY, THENCE SOO*00 '00" , 79.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE � P.O.C. — POINT OF COMMENCMENT 057' " . .42' FEET; THENCE S03"44"28"E. 175.03 FEET; THENCE " PLS — PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR N ° 7'0 70.4 FEET TO EAST RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF SAID SURVEYORS' REVIEW FOR CONFORMITY ' ° , " DINTS IA AVENUE' THENCE N 00 0 174.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF FND 1/2" I.R. NO I.D. PSM — PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR 8t MAPPER , BEGINNING. PRM PER EXISTING PLAT O.R. — OFFICIAL RECORDS "} UPON THE REQUEST OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, I HEREBY (FND) — FOUND f , (I.D.) — IDENTIFICATION R PLAT OF 3L OCKS 80 AAvL9 61 OF UXI T (WIT) — WITNESS TO CORNER `_4 NOT BEEN VERIFIED FOR MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE. k1AAIDALA Y PER PLA T OCA,' PAGE- DEDICATION: f 11' (I.R.) — IRON ROD r I 7 STATE OF +r - s i >! PINELLAS TYPE OR PRINT COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, Karleen F. DeBlaker, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida, hereby certify that this has been plat examined and that it IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME OR HAS PRODUCED ----- AS IDENTIFICATION AND DID-- OR DID NOT-- TAKE AN OATI. KNOWN O BE THE PERSON DESCRIBED a EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT • AND SEVERALLY ACKNOWLEDGED THE EXECUTION THEREOF s BE HIS FREE y AS SUCH OFFICER FOR THE USES ANI PURPOSES EXPRESSED, AND THAT SAID INSTRUMENT • i 11TNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL AT THE ABOVE DATE. MY COMMISION EXPIRES NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA SEAL _ _________ FND 1/2" I.R. PLS 1982 REPLACED WITH PRM 4821 on ire i i • SET PRM 4821 LOT 1 LOT 7 REPLACED PRIVI t > rn LOT CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPUTY _ CLERK F ,02-11111 1 xir. • a 1 , FND 4X4 CM NO I.D. LOT 4 RE PL A T OF BLOCKS 80 A ND 8 1 OF b `V /T 5, Ark /94L A Y PER PL A T ROOK 24f, PA GE 8 Eugene Caudell, .. r r. E.T.Coudell, Associates, Inc. LB No. 6492 �• • - • i' g g_ _g g S g g S STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, Karleen F. DeBlaker, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida, hereby certify that this has been plat examined and that it complies with all the requirements of the Statutes of Florida pertaining to maps and plats and that this plat has been filed for record in Plot Book__M Pages) Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, this day of - - - -- 2Q - - - -- Karleen F. DeBlaker, Clerk By. _ _____N --- N---- Pinellas County, Florida - Deputy Clerk � t SURVEYORS' REVIEW FOR CONFORMITY TO CHAPTER 177, PART 1, FLORIDA STATUTES "} UPON THE REQUEST OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 177.081(1), FLORIDA STATUTES, I HAVE REVIEWED THIS PLAT AND FIND THAT IT CONFORMS TO CHAPTER 177, PART I OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES. THE GEOMETRIC DATA HAS `_4 NOT BEEN VERIFIED FOR MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE. FND 4X4 CM NO I.D. LOT 4 RE PL A T OF BLOCKS 80 A ND 8 1 OF b `V /T 5, Ark /94L A Y PER PL A T ROOK 24f, PA GE 8 Eugene Caudell, .. r r. E.T.Coudell, Associates, Inc. LB No. 6492 �• • - • i' g g_ _g g S g g S