Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2007-11032
FLD2007-11032 63 PARK PLACE BLVD N PARK PLACE OFFICE SITE Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ Wa CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: ORIGINAL„ REGW -JAN 02 2007 . "ANIi'Nr -' WARTIVENT CITY OF CLEAffiNATEP * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ,r FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4 -21 APPLICANT NAME: Zeus Development, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 2630 West Bay Drive, Suite 105, Belleair Bluffs, FL 33770 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 518 -8500 FAX NUMBER: (727) 518 -8553 _ ....................... . . .- CELL NUMBER EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Offices at Park Place, LLC List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: Mr. Richard Harris, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 13825 (COT Boulevard, Suite 605, Clearwater, FL 33760 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 524 -1818 FAX NUMBER: (727) 524 -6090 CELL NUMBER: (727) 460 -0089 - EMAIL: rharris @gulfcoc, B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED USE(S): Park Place Office Site PROJECT VALUATION: $ 2,500,000.00 63 Park Place Blvd., Clearwater, Florida 33759 Portion of 17/29/16/85546/000 /0010 (Parcel 1) 7.394 ac. Please see attached Leoal Description. PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 57,484 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Flexible development to allow a day care center within the Park place DRI and within an Specifically identify the request IRT zoning district. (include number of units or square — . ............................... — . ............. ........ ..............._. .... . -- ... ........ ............... -- footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop \planningforms_0707 \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 1 of 8 ORIGINAL RECOM .Jlii� 02 2007 PLAN-1411W DEMURVIENT CITY OF CLUftA- TER LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PART OF LOT 1i, STORZ OPTHALMPICS, INC, PARK PLACE, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 109, PACE 10 OF THE PUBIJC RECORDS, Or PINELLAS COUNTY, FL DA, OEM MORE PARTICULARLY MSCM8ED AS FOLLOiMS BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE S.0019 1210E, ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID LOT 1, 380Z8 MET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINEW S.;89l5YIrW,, 96.81 FEET, THENCE S,44WWW, 15,25 FEET, THENCE S.8945SWW., MOO FIEET; THENCE N.+V32'11'W., t-5,10, FMT,- THENCE S.8953'WW., 619.02 FEET; THENCE Sa56'2,WSa"W,, 28,44 FEET TO A POINT ON, THE 'WEST UNE OF SAID LOT 1. ALSO BEING A NON—TANGENT CURVE 014CAVE EAMRLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF $10,00 FEET, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 142.72 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL. ANGLE OF 13-208r (CHORD OEM, NG N'03"12' 5"W. 142.39 FEET) TO A POINT OF' REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A. RADIUS OF 690.00 FEET: THEACE CONTINUE ALONG SA0 WEST UNE THE FOLLOVANG 3 COURSE'S: 1) NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 41,3D FEET THRO(JGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03T5'46- (CHORD BEARING U.01-46'427E.41.29 FEET; 2) THENCE NXOVS49"E., 190.21 FEET- 3) THENCE N.45W'49"E.. 35.36 FELT TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAD LOT 1'. THENCE S89"501t., ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF SAID LOT 1, 815Z FEET TO THE POINT OF SEGINNING. CONTAINING :7,M4 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. NgJL THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHOWN ABOVE LIES WHOLLY WITHIN THE DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN IN FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE, COMMITMENT NUMBER 05-005-31Z334: DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS CDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ✓ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. 0 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The 57,484 s.f. represents a 0.18 FAR whereas up to 0.65 is permitted in IRT zone. Adjoining properties have FAR that are similar or higher. The layout provides a substantial amount of open space including ponds and landscaped areas. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The site abuts an existing light- industrial building (100,000 s.f.) and is surrounded by public roads on 3 sides. Adjacent lands are already developed. It will not discourage appropriate use of adjacent land nor hinder the value. 3. The convenience of an on -site day care center will be a great convenience to the people who live and work in the area The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The day care center will provide convenient day care to persons living and working in the area. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The 57,484 s.f. of office space would generate only 599 daily trips, and 85 PM peak hour trips. All traffic generation is vested per the approved Park Place DRI Development Order (Ordinance # 7215 -03). (See attached response to comments.) 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The Park Place DRI is a mixed -use development containing office, industrial, retail, and residential uses. The proposed day care center is consistent with IRT zoning and the surrounding development and will be a great accessory to the site. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The buildings are situated in the center of the site, well setback from adjoining uses to minimize visual, acoustic and olfactory impacts. The site is surrounded by public roads on 3 sides. C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infll Project (FLD) 04MMAL Page 2 of 8 RE MM JAN 02 1007 P N 'NG DWRIVENr CITY OF CIF Pict, WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. A day care center within the Park Place DRI is a great accessory use. See attached response to comments. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district The site is presently vacant. The existing site is valued at $2.5 million; upon completion the site will be valued at $14 million. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See attached response to comments. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The Park Place DRI is a mixed -use development containing office, light industrial, retail, and residential uses. The proposed day care center is compatible with adjacent uses within Park Place. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. Other office sites may exist but do not offer the location, access, and proximity to complementary uses offered by this site. The IRT zone is an ideal zone for a day care center for use by the persons who live and work within the Park Place DRI. (See attached response to comments.) 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the Jollowing design elements: Changes in horizontal building planes; Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; Variety in materials, colors and textures; Distinctive fenestration patterns; Building stepbacks; and lid Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The flexibility is being requested for the placement of a day care center within the Park Place DRI. (See attached response to comments.) OPIAINAI C: \Documents and Setting s \derek.ferguson\ Desktop \planningforms_ 0707 \Comprehensive Infill Project (RK91W.doc Page 3 of 8 AN 02 2007 CITY OF CLWIMATER E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable U ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included ormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) A SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; ® TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; 0 TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; [a LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). N/A Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; m PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORIGNU C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infill PrQ- 24- 07.doc Page 4 of 8 JAN 02 2007 PLANNNG TwrimT CITY 0t' CLW.,N :TER NORTH PARK PLACE REDEVELOPMENT STORMWATER NARRATIVE The property in question is the north part of the Park Place Storz Opthalmics Light Industrial Complex which was developed in the early 1990's (now Bausch & Lomb). Existing stormwater detention ponds on the northeast and northwest comers of this site were constructed in the late 1980's as part of the overall master drainage system for Park Place. This system envisioned two 100,000 s.f buildings and parking on Parcel 1. These two ponds in Parcel 1, along with ponds at the south end of the Bausch & Lomb property, are sized to accommodate the stormwater quality and quantity needs of the entire site. The current proposal is an actual reduction in the amount of impervious area from 167,796 s.f. to 157,820 s.f. With this reduction of impervious area, it is apparent that the existing stormwater detention system can handle the proposed development. The original project was permitted using a curve number of 80 (see attached calculations). We have enclosed pre - development composite CN calculations and post - development composite CN calculations based on the proposed and previously proposed impervious areas. The CN number does go down to 78.4. Revised September 28, 2007 ORIGIMAL REG'ED JAI 02 2007 P1ANNEG Mkuvr m CITY OF OLEAP "Al= �r-R G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; N/A Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; V( All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; V( All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including N/A description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. W1 SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED I/ N/A T� V T V T V Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 6 REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/: X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: V( One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); V Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; ORIG9CYiAL C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infll Project(FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 5 of 8 orli l 040 2007 PLANNING DEPAI&eIr-ilT CITY Or. CL A ;.TER H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): T All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; T� Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; VT Sight visibility triangles; V Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree surrey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and 1/ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and _ percentage covered; N/A Conditions Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. Od REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) Od BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS —with the following information; _ All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; Gd REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8 % X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3 -1806) ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ORIGINAL RE OMARD C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop\ planningforms _0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04- 2,4jQt.d; 2007 Page 6 of 8 MY CA CL " i'YER K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) Ll Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and /or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. 6 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all �Traffic gs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. act Study is not required. 44 CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. 5d Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in thi pp' tion. 1 .• ignature of property owner or representative C: \Documents and Settings \derek.ferg STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PIN LI ASS Swor to and sybscribed before me this "�' day of CJ A.D. 20 to me and /or by who is personally known has produced as identification. Notary public, My commission e ' s"o—)7or ... ,1xj 0 2 2007 CITYC)r GLEAw :TER e,l gct (FLD) "-% C :Notary Public - State of Florida MyC0mm1ssionE10resAug5,2008 Commission # DD344087 '�"?IF.. t 11 Bonded By National Notary Assn. N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: Offices at Park Place, LLC 2. That (I am /we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 63 Park Place Boulevard and adjacent vacant land (Parcel ID # 17/29/16/85546/000 /0010) 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible Development approval for day care center. 4. That the undersigned (has /have) appointed and (does /do) appoint: Mr. Richard Harris, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. as (his /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1 /wee), a undersigned authority, hereb certify that the foregoing is true and correct. V ,� l u- LAC P P, rty Owner Property Owner Prop6rty Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this _ `1 (1 -( _ day of ,TArWaCA, (Z personally appeared ✓mod e- _ Q� �,�,� who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he /she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. �.4p,0.Y RUB i� AMY E. LEBLANC ?a °, .`;Notary Public - State of Florida MVC0rnmW0r1 EVIres Aug 5, 2008 %9F °Ppc Commission # DD344087 Notary Public S' natur '1�� � Bonded By National Notary Assn. 'c r Notary Seal /Starr My Commission xpires: C: \Documents and Settings \derek.fer la iop\ planningforms f0707\Comprehensive Inll Project (FLD) 04- 24- 07.doc RECS-ti l D Page 8 of 8 7 -. C) 2 2007 PLAWNG DEPARpprENT CITY OF, CL ��'e%TEP 3' • '4 EXISTING ACCESS °a 0 p, 5: Z OFFICE 82,179 SF PARCEL 8 (82,179 SF EXISTING) PARCEL 3 MULTI — FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI- FAMILY O.U. EXIST) OFFICE 101,900 SF PARCEL 4 (101,900 SF EXISTING) COMMERICAL (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (55,278 SF EXIST ON PARCELS 7 AND 9) ' ' � COMMERCIAL I��u'll PARCEL 10 (11,303 SF EXISTING) GUI TO BAY BOULEV PARCEL 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 200,000 SF (100.000 SF EAST01G) _EXISTING ACCESS NATURAL AREA PARCEL 2 0 OJv MULTI — FAMILY 156 D.U. G� (158 MULTI- FAMILY D.U. EXIST) Qv F/ r2FE PARCEL 5 EL 6 0,560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) PLANNED) l 220,568 SF COMMERCIAL PARCEL 11 (14,539 SF EXISTING) LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ ■ V rn pP 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 304,639 SF 100,000 SF 1 LT. INDUSTRIAL 100,000 SF � 200,000 SF MULTI— FAMILY s -� a RESIDENTIAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 0 250 500 EXISTING ACCESS °a 0 p, 5: Z OFFICE 82,179 SF PARCEL 8 (82,179 SF EXISTING) PARCEL 3 MULTI — FAMILY 234 D.U. (234 MULTI- FAMILY O.U. EXIST) OFFICE 101,900 SF PARCEL 4 (101,900 SF EXISTING) COMMERICAL (RETAIL) 55,278 SF PARCEL 7 (55,278 SF EXIST ON PARCELS 7 AND 9) ' ' � COMMERCIAL I��u'll PARCEL 10 (11,303 SF EXISTING) GUI TO BAY BOULEV PARCEL 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 200,000 SF (100.000 SF EAST01G) _EXISTING ACCESS NATURAL AREA PARCEL 2 0 OJv MULTI — FAMILY 156 D.U. G� (158 MULTI- FAMILY D.U. EXIST) Qv F/ r2FE PARCEL 5 EL 6 0,560 SF OFFICE EXISTING) PLANNED) l 220,568 SF COMMERCIAL PARCEL 11 (14,539 SF EXISTING) LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 304,639 SF 100,000 SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100,000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI— FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU 485,759 SF 200,000 SF 685,759 SF TOTAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU v a 0 z a NOSES: 1. THE PROPOSED AMOUNT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDIVIDUAL. UNDEVELOPED PARCELS ARE BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE MARKET INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. FUTURE THE AMOUNT OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER WILL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER. ACCESS 2. THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT REMAINS TO BE DEVELOPED IS REFERRED TO AS THE "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'. THE BUILD -OUT DATE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FOR THE TOTAL PROJECT IS DECEMBER 31, 2008. 3. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO 633 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED ON PARCEL 1 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE #5722 -95 4. ANY MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE LIMITED TO PARCELS 2, 3, 6 AND 8. 5. PARCEL 615 PLANNED FOR 100,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. CONVERSION RATES OF 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.40 MULTI- FAMILY UNITS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 240 UNITS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO 2.44 HOTEL ROOMS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 244 UNITS ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL 6 AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE . 6678 -01. ARD `� COMMERCIAL 25,842 SF (RETAIL) (25,842 SF EXISTING) PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP H Gulf Coast Consultants, Inc. DATE: Land Development Consulting REVISED: FIGURE: AUGUST 22, 2003 DRAWN BY: RAW ORIGINAL REONOW DEC 14 2007 Case Number: FLD2007 -11032 — 63 Park Place Blvd. N. P NIMC, DgnRTMrNT ClTY ®F CLE9.WATEe Planning: Comment No. 1: Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 1304.C.1, the development must be T� otherwise impractical without deviations from the � use and /or development standards set forth in the trio district. How is the development of this site impractical without a deviation to allow the proposed child daycare facility? The development of the site as a child daycare facility does not meet this criterion. Response No. 1: The requested deviations are necessary due to (i) the parcel being zoned "IRT" which occurred as a result of the parcel originally being part of the Bausch and Lomb tract; and (ii) the proposed day care center being located in a separate building from the surrounding uses it will serve. If located within the nearby office building, the proposed use would be considered as an accessory use, which would not require comp. infill approval. The proposed day care center meets the intent of the Code in allowing accessory uses; however, it is accessory to many uses, not just one particular building, as it will be located in the Park Place DRI which consists of office, light industrial and residential uses, all of which are expected to use the day care facility. (There are also retail uses in the DRI.) Comment No. 2: Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 1304.C.3, the development shall not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The response provided that the "day care center use is a permitted use" is incorrect. The use is not permitted as a principal use, but only as an accessory use to another use permissible as a minimum standard development use (this is why the application is a Comprehensive Infill application). As such, how will the proposal comply with the above criterion? Response No. 2: The proposed use will not impede development and improvement of the surrounding parcels. The surrounding parcels in the DRI are already developed. The proposed day care facility is to be located within the remaining undeveloped northerly parcel of the DRI known as Parcel 1. The entire parcel has been designed to provide adequate parking, traffic flow and pedestrian walkways. to serve the day care facility and adjoining office buildings and will be accessed by Park Place Boulevard.. The Bausch and Lomb parcel located southerly of Parcel 1 has existing crash gates at its driveways which will prohibit Parcel 1 users from trespassing to the Bausch and Lomb site. Comment No. 3: Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 1304.C.5, the proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying FLU category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, not substantially alter essential use characteristics of the neighborhood, and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of objectives "a" through "f" as incorporated herein. The application does not indicate which of the objectives the proposal is in compliance with. Response No. 3: The parcel has a land use designation of Industrial Limited. According to the Countywide Plan Rules, commercial and support uses are allows as secondary uses in the land use category. The day care use is compatible with adjacent land uses, which are residential, office and light industrial. Residents and employees of Park Place DRI will use the proposed day care center. Due to serving the many business uses within the DRI, the project meets objective (c), accommodation of the expansion of an existing economic contributor. The proposed application also meets objective (e), in that it provides for redevelopment where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot zoning for this particular location. As the day care center has been designed within the proposed Parcel 1 office development, it would not be practical to rezone the building occupied by the day care use. The property is unique in that it is part of the Park Place DRI. The DRI Opielft consists of a number of different zoning districts which were assigned at the time of adoption of the Community Development Code in 1999 in an attempt to be DEC 14 2007 compatible with the uses designated on the DRI master PLANNING =IZTl ENE plan. The DRI development order allowed for a CITYMCLEMATER conversion of certain uses and as a result the actual uses and the zoning districts are not entirely compatible in 2 some instances. For example, the residential development within the DRI is zoned "O" and "C ". Comment No. 4: Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 1304.C.6, flexibility with regard to use shall be justified based upon demonstrated compliance with the referenced design objectives Response No. 4: The proposed redevelopment complies with all of the design objectives as follows: a. It will be an accessory to the surrounding parcels and will not impede normal and orderly development as previously discussed. b. There are no design guidelines specified for this area. c. The design, scale and intensity of the DRI is established. The proposed development has an FAR of 0.18 which is similar to or less than that of adjoining parcels. (IRT district allows .65 FAR.) The site lay- out, including landscaping, is in harmony with existing developments within the DRI. d. Design elements have been incorporated as are realistic for the size of this one -story building. To the extent possible, the building has been designed to be consistent with others within the DRI. e. As shown on the plan, the outdoor play area is located on the northerly side of the building (toward Drew Street) and will.be buffered by a wall. The site will be appropriately buffered from surrounding parcels by proposed landscaping. Comment No. 5: Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 913.A.4, the proposed development shall be designed to minimize traffic congestion. Child daycare facilities typically have two peak traffic congestion times: when the children are dropped off and when they are picked up. The site has not been designed to minimize the traffic congestion that will occur for these times. Response No. 5: The entrance /exit is located on the westerly side of the OPIGINAL building. The children at the center will range in age from REM= 6 weeks to 5 years old. Due to the young age of the children, parents are required to escort the children in DEC 14 2007 PANNING DMRTMENT 3 MY OF CdF iPATER and out of the building. There will be no "drop off' lane as may be associated with a public school. The parents will need to park in a parking .space and go into the building when dropping off or picking up children. More than adequate parking is provided so there will be no "stacking" of vehicles looking for parking spaces. It is also anticipated that there may be some fluctuation in the times that children are picked up and dropped off. For example, the facility will open at 6 a.m. and some parents who have longer commutes will arrive at this time, where others that work in Park Place will likely arrive around 8:00 or 8:30 a.m. Some of the children may be enrolled at the facility for half -days or for less than 5 days a week. Due to these factors, the facility is not likely to have `'peak" hours, as would a public school with set hours for class. Comment No. 6: Where are children proposed to be dropped off and picked up? Response No. 6: The parents will park in a parking space and enter through the front door on the westerly side of the building. Comment No. 7: What is the age range of the children that will be cared for at the facility? Response No. 7: The children will range in age from 6 weeks to 5 years old. Comment No. 8: What are the hours of operation for the facility? Response No. 8: 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Comment No. 9: How many staff /childcare personnel will be employed? Response No. 9: A maximum of 23 staff members. Comment No. 10: How many children are proposed to be cared for (enrolled) at this facility? Response No. 10: A maximum of 200 children. Comment No. 11: Provide a floor plan for Building "A" (child care facility). Response No. 11: A floor plan is included with this resubmittal. ORIGIML REC= DEC 14 2007 4 IPMNING 135MR7MENT COY OF CI.I:APAJAaF �,' Comment No. 12: Provide a detail of the proposed crash gates. Response No. 12: The gates currently exist and were installed .by Bausch & Lomb. The plans have been revised to indicate that the gates are existing rather than proposed. Comment No. 13: Provide a copy of the cross access easement agreement. Response No. 13: A copy of the cross access easement agreement is included with this resubmittal. #422488 v1 - Mid- Pinellas/ParkPlace/Response to Comments 5 OEM& IRE DEC 14 2007 PLANNING OMMENT CITY OF CLEARWATUP r f(A6 iiil ?TRlJMENT PREPARED 01V O'Fripg.' �/:�puggias, P.A. %liitilan 6 = locks Road - �'P €tiP, 6x� 33756 -2056 r" uje 0, EC 14 2007 CY OF CLEARW TER KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PiNELLAs COi N-1 Y FLORIDA INST# 2007003558 01/04/2007 at 08:14 AM OFF REC BK.- 15566 PG: 1976 -1990 DocType :AGM RECORDING: $129,00 AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENTS (UTILITIES AND CROSS ACCESS) THIS AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENTS ( UTILITIES AND CROSS ACCESS) (this "Agreement ") is made and entered into the --.)A, s� day of L).2- b-,-- 2006 by BAUSCH & LOMB, INCORPORA.ATED, a New York corporation (successor to Storz Ophthalmics, Inc.), whose address is One Bausch and Lomb Place, Rochester, New York 12404- 2701 (hereinafter referred to as "Bausch "), and OFFICES AT PARIS PLACE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; whose address is 4500140`h Avenue North, Suite 101, Clearwater, Florida 33762 (hereinafter referred to as "OPP ") ( "Bausch" and "OPP" collectively referred to as the "Owners "). RECITALS: WHEREAS, OPP is the owner of certain real property located in Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described on Exhibit Ili "- Parcel G6A" attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "OPP Parcel "); and, WHEREAS, Bausch is the owner of certain real property south of and contiguous to the OPP Parcel, more particularly described on Exhibit "1" - Parcel "B" attached hereto and made apart hereof (the "Bausch Parcel "); and, WHEREAS, the parties have entered into this Agreement to provide, inter alia, for required cross easements for Park Place Office Site Emergency Vehicles Access, such as ambulances, fire trucks, police cars and emergency vehicles of applicable municipalities or public service providers ( "Emergency Access Vehicles ") located as per the Emergency Vehicle Access Exhibits 1 and 2 and to provide for utility easements for existing utilities and to include Sanitary Sewer Maintenance Responsibilities located as per the Sanitary Sewer Maintenance Responsibility Exhibits 1, 2 and 3; and, . WHEREAS, for purposes of this Agreement "utilities" shall include those facilities and systems for the transmission or other provision of and for utility services; including, but not limited to, water, sewer, electrical, gas, telecommunications and other public or private utilities providing Page 1 of 7 services for the benefit of the parcels and their respective owners and users; and, WHEREAS, for purposes of this Agreement, "Access Easement Areas" shall include those areas over and across all of the drive lanes and drive aisles now or hereafter located on the respective parcels for the purposes of pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress to and from the parcels; and, WHEREAS, said Access Easement Areas are required for the development of the OPP property and as granted will insure reasonable access, ingress and egress for emergency vehicles and personnel including, but not limited to, fire, police, emergency medical, utility providers and other similar agencies, as well as postal delivery and other similar agencies providing such services, for the use of and to the benefit of the owners and users of the subject parcels and improvements thereon from time to time. NOW, 'THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and other good and sufficient consideration, it is agreed as follows: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and represent the agreement and understanding of the.parties and are made a part hereof. 2. Reciprocal Cross Access Easements. (a) Grant. OPP hereby grants and conveys unto Bausch and its successors and assigns a non - exclusive easement over and across all of the drive lanes and drive aisles now or hereafter located on the OPP Parcel for the purposes of Emergency Vehicle Cross Access ingress and egress to and from the OPP Parcel. Bausch hereby grants and conveys unto OPP and its successors and assigns a non - exclusive easement over and across all of the drive lanes and drive aisles now or hereafter located on the Bausch Parcel for the purposes of Emergency Vehicle Cross Access, together with emergency personnel, ingress and egress to and from the Bausch Parcel. The easements for Emergency Vehicle Access granted in this subparagraph (a) are hereinafter referred to as the "Emergency Access Easements" and they are located per the Park Place Office Site Emergency Vehicle Access Exhibits 1 and 2 attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference and referred to herein as the "Emergency Vehicle Access Easement Areas ". The drive lanes and drive aisles now or hereafter located on each Parcel shall be referred to herein as the "Driveways ". (b) Relocation. The Owners each reserve the right to relocate, from time to time, any of the Access Easement Areas or the Driveways now or hereafter located on their respective Parcels and each Parcel shall continue to be reasonably served by the Access Easement Areas and Driveways now or hereafter located upon each of the Parcels. (c) Ilse. OPP reserves the right to use the Access Easement Areas for anypurpose not inconsistent with the rights granted to Bausch in this Agreement provided such use does not unreasonably interfere with Bausch's use of the Access Easement Areas. Bausch reserves the right to use the Access Easement Areas for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights granted to OPP in this Agreement provided such use does not unreasonably interfere with OPP's usoRM# ftccess Easement Areas. RED Page 2 of 7 DEC 14 2007 PLANNING DMRTMEW MY OF CLEAM.ATER OWGI AL RECM DEC 14 2007 PLANNING TMEW (d) 19�Iaintenance. CITY OFCL AVER (i) Owner's >ltestaonsa_ The Owners shall repair and maintain,.each at its own expense, the Driveways now or hereafter located on their respective Parcels in good order and repair. Subject to the provisions of Subparagraph (e) below, if replacement of the surface of any portion of the Driveways is required, the Owner of the Parcel over which such Driveways are located shall replace the surface with a material of a quality which is equal to or better than the quality of the material which it replaces. Com nencernent of Obligations. Except for damage to the Driveways arising from the events or conditions described in Subparagraph (e)(ii) or Subparagraph (e)(iii) below, neither Owner shall have any obligation to repair, maintain or reconstruct any of the Driveways now or hereafter located on that Owner's Parcel until such time as a certificate permitting occupancy of the building and other improvements now or hereafter located upon such Parcel has been issued by the City of Clearwater. (e) Dama�e or Destruction. If any of the Driveways are destroyed or damaged, the following provisions shall apply: (i) �lo Fault. If any of the Driveways are destroyed or damaged by casualty or accident, the cause of which is not attributable to the Owner of either Parcel or to conditions existing on such Owner's Parcel, each Owner shall be responsible for repairing and reconstructing the Driveways on that Owner's Parcel and for, paying the costs of the repair or reconstruction of the Driveways located on its Parcel. (ii) Construction Vehicles.. If the Driveways are destroyed or damaged by construction vehicles employed or contracted for by either Owner, the Owner employing or contracting for such construction vehicles shall be responsible for repairing and reconstructing the Driveways and shall bear the costs of repairing the Driveways. (iii) Owner at Fault. If the Driveways are damaged or destroyed by (aa) casualty or other causes attributable to the negligent or willful act or omission of either Owner, or (bb) conditions existing on one of the Parcels, the Owner at fault or upon whose Parcel such conditions existed shall be responsible for repairing and reconstructing the Driveways and shall bear the full costs of repair and restoration of the Driveways. 3. Utility Easements. The parties grant one to the other, and to their respective successors and assigns, non - exclusive utility easements for accesses to and for maintenance, installation and repair of the Sanitary. Sewer System as presently located at and with maintenance Page 3 of 7 responsibilities as set forth on Park Place Office Site Sanitary Sewer Maintenance Responsibility Exhibits 1, 2 and 3 attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. When and as required to develop all or any portion of the Parcels, OPP and Bausch shall promptly grant for the benefit of the governmental authorities and/or the entities providing utility services appropriate utility easements and rights of way for the construction, installation, maintenance, repair and/or replacement of the utilities and for the connection to any existing utility line as such connection is authorized by the utilities utilizing such line and perpetual easements for the maintenance, use and operation of such utilities, including, without limitation, easements and rights ofwayfor the extension of water, sewer, electrical, gas and telecommunications; provided, however, that (a) no easement shall be located under any building or any other structure now or hereafter located on or intended to be located upon the Parcel to be affected by the easement, and no easements shall unreasonably impair the use being or to be conducted thereon, and (b) the exact location and terms upon which any such easement affecting the Parcel is granted, other than as specifically set forth herein, shall be consistent with the existing or anticipated development of the affected Parcel and shall be subject to the prior written approval of the owner of the affected Parcel, which approval shall not be delayed or withheld unreasonably. No easement granted in accordance with this Paragraph shall require the consent or approval of any tenant. OPP and Bausch each agree to execute such additional documents as may be reasonably necessary to effect the intent of this Paragraph or to indicate that as to any specific portion of each Parcel over which all required easements have been granted that its right to require additional easements over such Parcel is of no further force and effect. 4. )Emergency Maintenance Easement. Each party hereby grants to the other the Emergency Maintenance Easement which may be exercised in the event that a condition exists which, in the reasonable discretion of the party exercising such Emergency Maintenance, poses a threat or danger of property damage or personal injury. The cost of any work performed pursuant to such Emergency shall be borne by the party which otherwise would have been responsible for the payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. . 5. Connection to Existing Utilities and Sanitary Sewer. OPP may, at its sole cost and expense, and without the expense of Bausch, connect to the utilities and sanitary sewer now serving the Bausch Parcel provided that such work is required and has been scheduled and the timing is such that there shall be minimum disruption to the parties in possession. 6. Private nights. The Access Easement Areas are private and shall remain in the exclusive control of the Owners of the Parcels upon which they are located. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as or deemed to create any rights for the benefit of the general public except as ancillary to the Emergency Vehicle Access. 7. Matters of Record. The agreements and easements granted hereunder are subject to any and all matters, conditions, easements, reservations or restrictions of record now existing or that may exist in the future. 8. Taxes and Lien. Each party agrees to pay, prior to delinquency, all real and personal property taxes and assessments levied against their property. ORIGd RE Page 4 of 7 4 2007 PLANNING DLOARTmEW Cif OF CLATER 9. Binding A9reetngnt. This Agreement shall be a covenant running with the land binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors in interest, including each owner from time to time of the properties as described in the OPP Parcel and the Bausch Parcel, respectively; provided, however, that no present or future mortgagee or purchaser at foreclosure or transferee by deed in lieu of foreclosure shall have any obligation or liability for the payment of unpaid Costs. 10. Indemnification. The Owner of the OPP Parcel covenants and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Owner of the Bausch Parcel harmless from and against any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, liability and expense including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and costs, to the extent arising out of the use of the Access Easement affecting the Bausch Parcel and the Amenities Area. The Owner of the Bausch Parcel covenants and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Owner of the OPP Parcel harmless from and against any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, liability and expense, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and costs, to the extent arising out of the use of the Access Easements affecting the OPP Parcel and the Amenities Area. 11. Mediation. In the event of any dispute between the parties hereto, such dispute shall be submitted to Mediation in Pinellas County, Florida. 12. Title and Headinzs• References. Titles and headings to sections herein are inserted for convenience or reference only and are not intended to be a part of or to affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. All paragraph references in this Agreement are to the paragraphs of this Agreement unless expressly stated to the contrary. 13. Enforceability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be unenforceable, in whole or in part, such provision shall be limited to the extent necessary to render the same valid, or shall be excised from this Agreement, as circumstances require, and this Agreement shall be construed as if such provision had been incorporated herein as so limited or as if such provision had not been included herein, as the case may be. 14. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but together shall constitute one (1) and the same instrument. 1 ,, !UYkl , DEC 14 2007 PLANNING WARTMENT CITY OF CLEM, YATFP Page 5 of 7 Agreement for Easements (Utilities and Cross Access) DEC 14 2007 PLANNING DMRTMENy CITY OF CLEAIMATER IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement for Easements (Utilities and Cross Access) the day and year first above written. Witnesses: -.. L (Print Nam )_ THO a t u, (Print Name)_ KS. FBONTI RO ._Ij Witnesses: (Print Name (Print Name STATE OF FLORIDA } COUNTY OF PINELLAS } OPP: OFFICES AT PARIS PLACE, LLC, a Florida lim* ed h ' i company By: Name: STEVE E. ENGELHARDT Title: Managing Member Date executed: f 2f� ; 2006 BAUSCH: BAUSCH & LOMB, New York comamt Name: Title: Date executed: .TED, a 2006 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Ze- day of 2006 by STEVE E. ENGELHARDT, as Managing Member of OFFICES AT PART{ PLACE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of the company, who is personally known to me, or ❑ is not personally known to me, who produced as identification. NOTARY ;,,:,,; lam-• State. of Florida at Large Commission Number &Expiration Date: 5 o�AaY °�8� . Thomas W. Ruggles Commission # DD410100 Wage: 6, 7 ��� Expires April 8, 2009 '.', '1� OR londad Troy Fain • Inautanco, Inc. 800385 -1019 Agreement for Easements (Utilities and Cross Access) 1.1E: C 14 2007 PLANNING D RTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly ex d this Agreement for Easements (Utilities and Cross Access) the day and year first abov tten. Witnesses: OFFICES AT PARIS PLACE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (Print Name Witnesses: L STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS By: Name: STEVE E. ENGLEHART Title: Managing Member Date executed: RAUSCH: rr.��., BAUSCH & LOMB, INCORPORATED, a New York corporation By: L - r--- Name: Efrk n Rivera Title: com4 porate Vice President & Treasurer Date executed: 2006 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ 2006bySTEVE E. ENGLEHART, as ManagingMember PARK PLACE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of the cam personally known to me, or ❑ is not personally known t me, as identification./ NOTARY PUBLIC 4 OFFICES AT )'any, who: ❑ is who produced State of Florida at Large Commission Number & Expiration Date: Page 6 of 7 Agreement for Easements. (UtWffes and Craw Acceu) STATE OF NEW YORK } COUNTY OF --- �pg } DEC 14 2007 PLANNNG D t YMENT The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this —?-� day of )A4 k"'64r 2006 by v'nl �: rA . as . BAUSCH AND LO •�� k �r of corporation, who:Vis p�ersonnallvkn to me or 0 is not personally to ffie on who produced p ced as identification. NOTARY PUBLIC to of New York at Large Commission Number & Expiration Date: Fu2NGP3NuWnoFPICPS AT PA= PL%CBMpyF=M!m Pymmm 12- 19- Ob.Apd I203606-17/19/o6 AIART114 EAVJW ®ualft in Mon= CM —••,« z;nn Expires Feb Page 7 of 7 ORIGIN RED, i C 14 2007 r� PLANNING D6MRTMEW � 8� 1 6' l 79 CITY OF CLE*NAiER PARCEL "A" _ 63 Park Place Boulevard — A PART OF LOT 1, STI�RZ 01'THALMICS, INC. PARK PLACE, ACCORDING TO THE MAP, OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED PLAT HOOK 109, PAGE 11 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS CO' FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIED AS FOLLOWS: 13EGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT I THENCE . SOUTH 00019'21" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 380.43 3' FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH. 89"53' 14" WEST, 96.87 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44053'14" WEST, 15.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 891253114's WEST, 75.00 FEI ET; THENCE NORTH 44 °32' 11" WEST, 15.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH . WEST, 619,02 288.44 FRET; THENCE SOUTH 56020'58" WEST, POIN 44 FEET TO A T ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT I, ALSO BEING A NON - TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 610.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEI.tLY ALONG SAIL) CURVE 142.72 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANCZILE OF 13°24' 18" (CHORD BEARING NORTH 03 012'35" WEST, 142.39 FEET) TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTEI? LY HAVING A RADIUS OF 690.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID WEST LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES: 1) NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 41.30 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03°2546" (CHORD BE NORTH 01 °46'42" EAST, 41.29 FEET); 2) THENCE NORTH 00 003'49" EAST, 190.21 FEET; 3) THENCE NORTH 45 003'49" EAST 35.36 FEET TO THE NOR'T'HWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT -1 • THENCE SOUTH 89056'11 " EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 815.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 7.394 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "B" — 21 Park Place BoulcMard - A PART OF LOT 1, ST(DRZ OPTI3ALMICS, INC. PARK PLACE, ACCORDING TO THE MAP' OR P LAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT B OOK 109, PAGE 1(1 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUN'T'Y, FLORIDA, BE.CNG MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LO"1[' 1; THENCE SOUTH 00 °19'21" EAST, 380.43 FEET TO THE POINT° OF BEGINNING;. THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID LINE, SOT,TTH 00 019'21" EAST, 681.69 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT l; Page 1 of 2 EX jT psi» (c®nt�di DEC 14 2007 P1ANMjNG D6mRTMENT CITY OF CL AT THENCE ALOIiTC; SAID SOUTH LINE COURSES; 1) SOUTH 89040'39 THE FOLLOWING ; (�) 59 °39'49" yyES'T, 67.0 FEET; 3") WEST, 195.18 FEET; 2) NOI�.TI-i FEET, 4) SOUTH 72 ®25'38" NORTH' s1 °37'SS" NEST, S�:.I1 WEST, 41.99 FEET; 5) NORTH 75 °34'3x" NEST, 41.82 FEET; 6) SOUTH 83 ®04'43" WEST . R SOUTH' 40 038'34" WEST 41.06 FEET; 8) SOUTH WEST, 7) 4.23 FEET; 9) SOUTH 89 °40'39" WEST, 165.32 FEET TO WEST, . WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AND A NON- TANC�E 7�HE CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 365 CURVE THENCE AL,OIIT(a S� WESTERLY LINE THE FOL 0 FEET; THREE (3) COURSES; 1) NORTHERLY ALONG SAIDLCW]TtG 277.49 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL, ° CUI :V E BEARING NORTH 06 °5$'46" WEST 7G ®� O FEET3 30 (CH01M 28°45'31" WEST, 240.13 FEET TO A ), .2) NORTH IIA�/1NG A EVE CONCAVE EASTEP :LY RADIUS OF 610.00 FEET; 3) NORTHERLY. ALO:LY SAID CURVE 200.65 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF FEET)479TH ®Ri) BEARING NORTH 19 °20'08" WEST, 199.74 NCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE, NORTH 56020'58" EAST, 28.44 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8905331419 EAST, 619.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44 032'11" EAST, 15.10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89053#14v" EAST, 75.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44u53'14" EAST, 15.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89":53'14 )31 EAST, 96.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGNNI10 G. CONTAINING 10.377 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Page 2 of 2 11 ,�M! ��0000000 ti POLE/ BOX (TYP) 45.47 N w C I O O 0 z ' `- EMERGENCY VEHICLE CROSS- ACCESS N PROPERTY LINE ORIGIML RECUM DEC 14 2001 Scale:1 " =CEO' P KING D6WTMpp CffY0FCLEqWATg Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Park Place Office Land Development Consulting ���� 138251COT BIvd., Suite 605 Emergency Vehicle Access Clearwater, Florida 33760 Exhibit 1 Phone: (727)524.1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090' n. r L POLE/ rnICA� OX (rrP) N CQN) Scale: I "=40' 9 9 Q O❑❑ 6 S89053'1 4" VEHICLE CROSS- ACCESS LINE MGM RECWM DEC 14 2007 PLANNING WARTmENI CRYOMEARMMAM Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting 13825 ICOT Blvd., Suite 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 Plione: (727) 524 -1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 Park Place Office Site Emergency Vehicle Access Exhibit 2 0 J O 0 B a r /c N Scale:1 ' =40' Ll A TYP) 4 Y, 0f111 ■TT ■T ■i�l omo 1= S89053'1 SANITARY SEWER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY — 50% BAUSCH & LOMB, 50% MID— PINELLAS OFFICE PARK, INC. ROPERTY LINE Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting 13825 ICOT Blvd., Suite 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 Piione:(727)524 -1818 Fax: (727) 524 -6090 •.� j�.I -art: DEC 14 2007 PMNING DWRTMEN` . CITY ®FCLE ANATF Park Place Office Site Sanitary Sewer Maintenace Responsibility Exhibit 'I B B � B ❑00000 EXIST UGN, POLE/ ELECTRICAL OX (TYP) IM 40 SCale:1 " =4p' Im 89053'1 4"W ROPERTY LINE SANITARY SEWER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY — 100% BAUSCH & LOMB. d ° a n Park Place Office Site Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Sanitary Sevver Land Development Consulting Ililaintenace Responsibility 13 825 ICOT Blvd., Suite 605 Exhibit 2 Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727)524 -1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090. RED DEC 14 2007 ,CffV ®F [`l 1`Aaeb.W,r t a rl Z 3 r 'lll0l I. 53'11 4"W 619.02 SANITARY SEWER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY — N 100% MID— PINELLAS. OFFICE PARK;, INC. PROPERTY LINE OWN sia: =ao' 142007 PLANNING DWRTMEW CITY OF CLEARWAY Park Place Office Site Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Sanitary Sewer Land'Deve lopment Consulting Maintenace Responsibility 13825 [COT Blvd., Suite 605 Exhibit Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727) 524 -1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 15, 2008 Mr. Richard D. Harris 13825 Icot Boulevard, Suite #154 Clearwater, Florida 33760 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLD2007 -11032 — 63 Park Place Boulevard Dear Mr. Harris: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4- 206.D.6. On January 15, 2008, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development approval for a Retail Sales and Services use (child care) as a principal use where it would otherwise only be permissible as an accessory use within the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment project pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2- 1304.C. The CDB APPROVED the application with conditions based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. Findings of Fact: 1. That the 7.394 -acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of Drew Street and Park Place Boulevard within the Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI); 2. That the subject property is zoned Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District with an underlying Industrial Limited (IL) Future Land Use category; 3. That the applicant proposes to establish a stand -alone retail sales and services use (child care) where it would otherwise only be permissible as an accessory use within a building used for a minimum standard use; 4. That the development proposal does not require any deviations from applicable minimum lot area requirements, minimum lot width requirements, minimum setback requirements, maximum building height, minimum off - street parking requirements, and/or any landscape code requirements; and 5. That there are no active Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Master Development Plan for the Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI); 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria for the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District as per Community Development Code Sections 2- 1301.1 and 2 -1304; 3. That the development proposal will be consistent with the Flexibility Criteria for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects as per Community Development Code Section 2- 1304.C, provided that the attached conditions of approval are met; and FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" January 15, 2008 FLD2007 -11032 / 63 Park Place Boulevard Page 2 of 2 4. That the development proposal will be consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3- 913.A, provided that the attached conditions of approval are met. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all outstanding comments of the Engineering Department shall be addressed; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised architectural elevations shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review /approval that are consistent with the building at the easternmost portion of the subject property and that meet a substantial number of the design elements set forth in design objective (d); 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a floor plan shall be provided that is consistent with the site plan with regard to building-size /dimensions and playground size /dimensions; and 4. That all future signage associated with the development and /or tenant spaces be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the buildings and be consistent with the materials and colors of the buildings. Pursuant to Section 4 -407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of a Flexible Development approval (by January 15, 2009). All required Certificates of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity of the Development Order. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B of the Community Development Code by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 29, 2008 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562 -4539 or via e -mail at robert.tefft a,myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AIC Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished Applications ftrk Place Blvd 63 The Learning Experience (IRT & DR[) Approved 01- 15- 081Park Place Blvd 63 - Development Order 01- 15- 08.doc Gulf Coast Consulting, ' Inc. Land Development Consulting • Engineering • Planning • Transportation • Permitting ICOT Center 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727) 524 -1818 Fax: (727) 524 -6090 December 13, 2007 Mr. Robert TefFt, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: FLD2007 -11032 63 Park Place Blvd. N. Dear Robert: We are enclosing for your further handling, fifteen (15) complete copies of the site plan submittal for the above - referenced project. This submittal does include responses to the review comments received at the DRC meeting on December 6, 2007. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information concerning this project. Sincerely, r � Richard D. Harris, P.E. Principal RDH:aI Encl. cc: Steve Engelhardt, Hallmark Development of Florida, Inc. (w /encl.) George Kolitsopoulos, Zeus Development, LLC (w /encl.) File 06 -009 ®RNA. VOW OEC 14 2007 PL4NNINGOWNEW =®01C AIER 9.15 am Case Number: FLD2007 -1 1032 -- 63 PARK PLACE BLVD N Owner(s): Paul Engelhardt 4500 140th Ave. N., #101 Clearwater, Fl 33762 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Applicant Zeus Development Llc 2630 West Bay Dr Ste 105 Belleair, F133770 TELEPHONE: 727 -518 -8500, FAX: 727 -518 -8553, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Richard D Harris 13825 Icot Blvd Ste# 605 Clearwater, F133760 TELEPHONE: 727 - 524 -1818, FAX: 727 -524- 6090, E -MAIL: No Email Location: 7.394 -acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Drew Street and Park Place Boulevard Atlas Page: 291A Zoning District: IRT, Industrial, Research and Technology Request: Flexible Development approval for a Retail Sales & Service use (child care) as a principal use where it would otherwise-only be permissable as an accessory use within the Industrial, Research & Technology (IRT) District pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 1304.C. Proposed Use: Retail sales and services Neighborhood No Registered Assocation Association(s): TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P 0 Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, James Keller Richard Harris (Applicant) The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 4 Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Overall dimension of dumpster pad per City specification is 14' -8" x 14' -8 ". Please revise dimension on sheet 3/8 accordingly. 2. Include City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index 701, pages 1/3 and 3/3. Construction Standards and Utility Information can be found on our web site: www. myclearwater. com/ gov/ depts/ pwa /engin/Production/stddet/index .asp. \ 3. A separate right -of -way permit will be required for all work within the right -of -way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562 -4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 4. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.095), set the water meter (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.096) and set the B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). The applicant is responsible for the water main extension from the tap to the device. Applicant is also responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. 5. Provide a copy of an approved D.E.P. permit for the installation of the water main and appurtenances. 6. Provide a copy of an approved D.E.P. permit for the installation of the sanitary sewer extension prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. Need to raise tree canopy above 16.5 ft. to accommodate solid waste collection at all dumpster locations. 8. New dumpster enclosures: Maximum 6' -0" high and constructed of concrete block. Materials used should be consistent with those used in the construction of and architectural style of the principal building, see City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C ", Construction Standards, Index #701. 9. If a cafeteria or other similiar food preparation service area is proposed applicant will need to install a suitably sized grease trap. 10. Prior to fire hydrant leads and other unrestricted water lines being brought into service, contractor shall have conducted a hydrostatic pressure test in accordance with Section IV, paragraph 41.4.1. of the City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards. Testing shall not be done prior to giving City Construction Inspector a minimum 48 hours notice of the time the installation is ready for hydrostatic testing. As -built drawings shall be submitted prior to the hydrostatic test. 11. Applicant shall sterilize all unrestricted water lines in accordance with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards paragraphs 41.5. through 41.5.4. A bacterial test shall be conducted with satisfactory results prior to the water systems being brought into service. All such testing shall be arranged and inspected by the City's Construction Inspector. As -built drawings shall be submitted prior to the bacterial test. 12. Show on the plan the length and type of materials proposed to be used for water main installation. 13. All fire hydrant assemblies installed greater than 10 ft. from a water main shall be constructed with ductile iron pipe and shall have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line, and at the fire hydrant assembly (F.H.A.). 14. All polyvinyl chloride pipes shall be laid with an insulated 12 gauge A.W.G. solid strand copper wire wound around the pipe forming one complete spiral per joint of pipe. This wire is to be continuous with splices made only by methods approved by the Engineer. This wire is to be secured to all valves, tees and elbows. See City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "B ", Technical Specifications, Section IV, Article 41.02(B)(2). 15. A double detector check valve with bypass meter shall be required for any internal fire protection line. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as -built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as -built drawings for accuracy. 2. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 5 General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . No Issues. Fire: I , Relocate proposed FHA Bid C to to end of penninsula so as not to be blocked by parking spaces.PRIOR TO CDB 2. Add fire hydrant 25 to 50 feet from Fire Department Connection.PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: I . No issues. Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: I . No issues - property exempt from open space /recreation impact fee Ordinances 3128 -83 and 3129 -83. Stormwater: I . The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. 1. Provide a copy of the SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption. 2. Stormwater narrative refers to see attached drainage calculations but no calculations were included. Please submit the drainage calculations and master drainage plan supporting the narrative. 3. Provide stormwater pipes and structures chart. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: I . Seems to no have enough solid waste service would suggest a compactor or at least two more Dumpster locations Traffic Engineering: I . No Issues. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 6 I . Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 1304.C.1, the development must be otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in the district. How is the development of this site impractical without a deviation to allow the proposed child daycare facility? The development of the site as a child daycare facility does not meet this criterion. 2. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 1304.C.3, the development shall not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The response provided that the "day care center use is a permitted use" is incorrect. The use is not permitted as a principal use, but only as an accessory use to another use permissable as a minimum standard development use (this is why the application is a Comprehensive Infill application). As such, how will the proposal comply with the above criterion? 3 . Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 1304.C.5, the proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying FLU category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, not substantially alter essential use characteristics of the neighborhood, and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of objectives "a" through "f' as incorporated herein. The application does not indicate which of the objectives the proposal is in compliance with. 4. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 1304.C.6, flexibility with regard to use shall be justified based upon demonstrated compliance with the referenced design objectives. 5 . Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 3- 913.A.4, the proposed development shall be designed to minimize traffic congestion. Child daycare facilities typically have two peak traffic congestion times: when the children are dropped -off and when they are picked -up. The site has not been designed to minimize the traffic congestion that will occur for these times. 6. Where are children proposed to be dropped -off and picked -up? 7. What is the age range of the children that will be cared for at the facility? 8. What are the hours of operation for the facility? 9. How manny staff /childcare personnel will be employed? 10. How many children are proposed to be cared for (enrolled) at this facility? 11 . Provide a floor plan for building "A" (child care facility). 12. Provide a detail of the proposed crash gates. 13 . Provide a copy of the cross access easement agreement. Other: No Comments Notes: The application is insufficient to proceed to the CDB. All comments, unless otherwise noted, must be addressed by Monday, December 10, 2007, in order for the application to be placed on the agenda for the next DRC meeting (01/03/08). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 6, 2007 - Page 7 CITY OF CLEARWATER Posy OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERvicEs BuiwiNG, 100 SOUTH MYRTI.E AvENuE, CLEARWATF.R, FIARIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -41365 PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 7, 2007 Mr. Richard D. Harris 13825 Icot Boulevard, Suite #154 Clearwater, Florida 33760 Re: FLD2007 -1 1032 — 63 Park Place Boulevard — Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Harris: VIA FAX: (727) 524 -6090 The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2007- 11032. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, December 6, 2007, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefk Planner III Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 E -Mail: robert.re 1 ions wlearwater•.coni FRANK HjDa1RD, MAYOR JOHN DoRA:\, CoUNaLMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCRAFmurR "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMAnw. ACTION EMPLOYER" CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~_ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562 -4567 FAx: (727) 562 -4865 Date: To: From: Re: Comments: FACSIMILE COVER SHEET November 21, 2007 Richard Harris, (727) 524 -6090 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2007 -1 1032 163 Park Place Blvd. Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 ** Please confirm receipt via e -mail at: robert.te ft(a,niycleanvater.cor)I ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at Lim elearivater.com ** PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 5, 2007 Mr. Richard D. Harris 13825 Icot Boulevard, Suite #154 Clearwater, Florida 33760 CI'I'Y OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLD2007 -11032 — 63 Park Place Boulevard — Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Harris: VIA FAX: (727) 524 -6090 The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2007- 11032. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: 1. Pursuant to Section F of the application, a tree survey and tree inventory are required to be included with the submittal. 2. Pursuant to Section G of the application, the site plan shall include the following: ❑ lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); ❑ building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); and ❑ structural overhangs. 3. Please resubmit the landscape plan as one plan, not three. Also, incorporate the three planting schedules into one planting schedule. Pursuant to Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified' by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Tuesday, November 13, 2007. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 5624865 E- Mail: robert .tefftLcy:nayclearwater.coin FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~_ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562 -4567 FAx: (727) 562 -4865 Date: To: From: Re: Comments: FACSIMILE COVER SHEET November 5, 2007 Richard Harris, (727) 524 -6090 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2007 -1 1032 163 Park Place Boulevard Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.teCft(a�niyclear-water.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclea.rwater.com ** CDB Meeting Date: January 15, 2008 Case Number: FLD2007 -11032 Agenda Item: E. 2. Owner: Offices at Park Place, LLC. Applicant: Zeus Development, LLC. Agent: Richard Harris, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Address: 63 Park Place Boulevard GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: CURRENT ZONING: CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: EXISTING SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Flexible Development approval for a Retail Sales and Services use (child care) as a principal use where it would otherwise only be permissible as an accessory use within the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment project pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2- 1304.C. Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District Industrial Limited (IL) Current Use: Vacant (under construction) Proposed Use: Retail Sales and Services (Child Care) North: Medium Density Residential Assisted Living Facility; and (MDR); and Open Space / Outdoor Recreation / Entertainment Recreation (OS /R) South: IRT Manufacturing East: Mobile Home Park (MHP) Mobile Home Park West: Office (0) Attached Dwellings ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 7.394 -acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of Drew Street and Park Place Boulevard. It is noted that the subject property is presently under construction for an unassociated office building that will occupy the eastern portion of the site. The property is zoned Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) with an underlying Future Land Use category of Industrial Limited (IL), and is also located within the boundaries of the Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The Park Place DRI was established on September 1, 1983, via Ordinance No. 3205 -83, but has been amended several times since its inception. According to the most recent Ordinance regarding the DRI (Ordinance No. 7215 -03), the uses associated with subject property shall be Light Industrial. Development Proposal: The development proposal does not require any deviation from the development standards of the IRT zoning district with regard to minimum lot area, minimum lot width, minimum required setbacks, maximum building height, minimum off - street parking requirement, as well as any landscape code Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007 -11032 —Page 1 requirement. The purpose of the application is that the proposed stand -alone retail sales and services use (child care) is not an allowed use within the IRT zoning district. As such, the applicant has submitted a Flexible Development (FLD) application for a Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment project to establish the stand -alone retail sales and services use (child care) within a 12,500 square foot building with an accessory 5,000 square foot outdoor playground. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per CDC Sections 2- 1301.1 and 2 -1304: Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District: Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 1303.L.3, the retail sales and services use shall be located within a building used for a minimum standard use in the district and the retail sales and services use shall occupy no more than ten percent of the floor area of the building. The applicant proposes to establish a retail sales and services use (child care) within its own 12,500 square foot building, which is inconsistent with the above provision of the zoning district. Accordingly, an application was, made to establish the use through the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project provisions as set forth in CDC Section 2- 1304.C. The following are the criteria set forth in CDC Section 2- 1304.C, the responses by the applicant (as applicable), and staff's analysis of the criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The applicant's response to this criterion is that: "A day care center within the Park Place DRI is a great accessory use. The requested deviations are necessary due to (i) the parcel being zoned IRT which occurred as a result of the parcel originally being part of the Bausch and Lomb tract; and (ii) the proposed day care center being located in a separate. building from the surrounding uses it will serve. If located within the nearby office building, the proposed use would be considered as an accessory use, which would not require comprehensive infill approval. The proposed day care center meets the intent of the Code in allowing accessory uses; however, it is accessory to many uses, not just one particular building, as it will be located in the Park Place DRI which consists of office, light industrial and residential uses, all of which are expected to use the day care facility. There are also retail uses in the DRI. " Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007 -11032 — Page 2 Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent I.S.R. 0.85 0.47 X F.A.R. 0.65 0.18 X Minimum Front: 20 feet North: 131.7 feet (to building) X Setbacks 58.6 feet (to pavement) East: 177.7 feet (to building) X 39.4 feet (to pavement) West: 205.5 feet (to building) X 122.7 feet (to pavement) Side: 15 feet South: 89 feet (to building) X 15 feet (to pavement) Maximum 50 feet 50 feet X Height Off - Street 3.0 / 1,000 SF Gross Floor Area 4.07 / 1,000 SF Gross Floor Area X Parkin (172 spaces) 234 spaces Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District: Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 1303.L.3, the retail sales and services use shall be located within a building used for a minimum standard use in the district and the retail sales and services use shall occupy no more than ten percent of the floor area of the building. The applicant proposes to establish a retail sales and services use (child care) within its own 12,500 square foot building, which is inconsistent with the above provision of the zoning district. Accordingly, an application was, made to establish the use through the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project provisions as set forth in CDC Section 2- 1304.C. The following are the criteria set forth in CDC Section 2- 1304.C, the responses by the applicant (as applicable), and staff's analysis of the criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The applicant's response to this criterion is that: "A day care center within the Park Place DRI is a great accessory use. The requested deviations are necessary due to (i) the parcel being zoned IRT which occurred as a result of the parcel originally being part of the Bausch and Lomb tract; and (ii) the proposed day care center being located in a separate. building from the surrounding uses it will serve. If located within the nearby office building, the proposed use would be considered as an accessory use, which would not require comprehensive infill approval. The proposed day care center meets the intent of the Code in allowing accessory uses; however, it is accessory to many uses, not just one particular building, as it will be located in the Park Place DRI which consists of office, light industrial and residential uses, all of which are expected to use the day care facility. There are also retail uses in the DRI. " Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007 -11032 — Page 2 The simple answer to the criterion is that the development of the subject property is not otherwise impractical without a deviation from the use standards of the zoning district. An office use could easily be established on the site, and an office is currently under construction on the easternmost portion of the site. _However, the primary reason that the application is being processed under these criteria is that this retail sales and services use, which would otherwise be allowable in the district, is being proposed as a stand -alone use and not within a building containing a minimum standard use. If this use were connected to the other building proposed on this site, this would not be an issue. Given the nature of the DRI, the applicants response makes sense, that the child care use will be accessory to the other uses on the subject property, as well as those uses on adjacent and nearby properties with the only difference being that there is an exterior walkway connecting. the uses and not an interior walkway. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. Pursuant to Objective 2.2 of the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the City of Clearwater shall continue to support innovative planned development and mixed land use development techniques in order to promote infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment. Further, pursuant to CDC Section 1- 103.E.4, it is, in part, the purpose of this development code to provide the most beneficial relationship between the uses of land and buildings. The proposed retail sales and services use (child care) is compatible with the surrounding environment. The use provides for a valuable and needed service /amenity in the area that will be beneficial to both those who reside in the nearby residential developments (including those within the Park Place DRI) as well as those who work in the adjacent light industrial and office uses. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The applicant's response to this criterion is that: "The proposed use will not impede development and improvement of the surrounding parcels. The surrounding parcels in the DRI are already developed. The proposed day care facility is to be located within the remaining undeveloped northerly parcel of the DRI known as Parcel 1. The entire parcel has been designed to provide adequate parking, traffic flow and pedestrian walkways to serve the day care facility and adjoining office buildings and will be accessed by Park Place Boulevard. " It is unlikely that any redevelopment will occur in the foreseeable future on any of the adjacent properties (north: Summerville Assisted Living Facility and E. C. Moore Softball Complex; south: Bausch & Lomb; east: Island in the Sun Mobile Home Park; and west: The Grand Reserve Apartments), and there is no provision in the Code that would negatively impact these properties should the proposed retail sales and services use (child care) be permitted on the subject property. Moreover, these adjacent uses will likely derive some benefit from their proximity to the use. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. As was previously stated with regard to criterion #3, there is no provision in the Code that would negatively impact adjoining properties should the proposed retail sales and services use (child care) be approved. Furthermore, it is likely that the adjoining property to the south (Bausch & Lomb) as Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007 -11032 — Page 3 well as the other neighboring properties will derive some benefit from their proximity to the proposed use. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying Future Land Use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a Minimum Standard, Flexible Standard or Flexible Development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. The applicant's response to this criterion is that: "The parcel has a [future] land use designation of Industrial Limited. According to the Countywide Plan Rules, commercial and support uses are allowed as secondary uses in the land use category. The day care use is compatible with adjacent land uses, which are residential, office and light industrial. Residents and employees [within the] Park Place DRI will use the proposed day care center. Due to serving the many business uses within the DRI, the project meets objective (c), accommodation of the expansion of an existing economic contributor. The proposed application also meets objective (e), in that it provides for redevelopment where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot zoning for this particular location. As the day care center has been designed within the proposed Parcel 1 office development, it would not be practical to rezone the building occupied by the day care use. " The proposed use is permitted by the underlying IL Future Land Use category as the Countywide Plan Rules identify Retail Commercial and Personal Service /Office Support as appropriate and consistent secondary uses within the IL. Further, as previously discussed, the proposed use will be compatible with adjacent land uses, and will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood. The proposed use will also provide for development in an area with other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; thus meeting objective (e) of the criterion. It is noted that objective (c), regarding the accommodation of the expansion of an existing economic contributor would not be met with this proposal. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007 -11032 — Page 4 ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Design objective (a), regarding the proposal not impeding the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties, has already been addressed in criterion #3, above, and the proposed will not result in any impedance. Design objective (b) is not applicable to this request, as no design guidelines exist for the subject property. With regard to design objective (c), the applicant has stated "the design, scale and intensity of the DRI is established. The proposed development has an FAR of 0. 18, which is similar to or less than that of adjoining parcels (IRT allows 0.65 FAR). The site layout, including landscaping, is in harmony with existing developments within the DRI. " With regard to design objective (d), the applicant has stated that the "design elements have been incorporated as are realistic for the size of this one -story building. To the extent possible, the building has been designed to be consistent with others within the DRI. " However, the proposed architectural elevations are wholly inconsistent with the office building currently under construction on the easternmost portion of the subject property [see attached Exhibits "A" and `B "], as well as the adjacent Bausch & Lomb building to the south [see attached photographs]. The inconsistency in architectural style between the proposed building and the building currently under construction will not provide for the cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance sought after by this design objective. What will result will be two diametrically opposed buildings that lack any cohesion or visual interest. Further, the proposed building lacks changes in horizontal building planes, distinctive fenestration patterns, building stepbacks, and a distinctive roof form; elements that, for the most part, will be found on the building at the easternmost portion of the subject property. Based upon the above, the proposed building has not incorporated a substantial number of design elements, and does not address the intent of the design objective. However, these are not unrecoverable issues, and the building can be redesigned to provide these design elements, meet the intent of the design objective, and thereby fulfill the requirements of this criterion. Therefore, it is attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised architectural elevations shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review /approval that are consistent with the building at the easternmost portion of the subject property and that meet a substantial number of the design elements set forth in design objective (d). With regard to design objective (e), the subject property requires no deviations from required setbacks and/or landscape buffer widths. Further, the site will be appropriately buffered from the surrounding properties by the proposed landscaping. Based upon the above, the proposed application has been determined to meet five of the six required Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria. However, compliance with the presently unmet criterion is possible and the requirements for said compliance has been attached as a condition of approval. Therefore, positive findings can be made with regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria. Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007 -11032 — Page 5 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2- 1304.0 (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment): 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's . economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. 1 See above discussion with regard to Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District. Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007 -11032 — Page 6 Consistent Inconsistent X X X X X X1 Development of Regional Impact (DRII: As stated previously, the subject property is a part of the Park Place DRI, which was established on September 1, 1983, via Ordinance No. 3205 -83. The original DRI has been amended several times since its inception and according to the most recent Ordinance (Ord. No. 7215 -03), the subject property is for light industrial use. However, the ordinances have always been silent as to what would be permissible as a light industrial use; therefore, with regard to determining use compliance, the practice has always been to defer to the zoning district associated with the specific property. As such, the proposed retail sales and services use (child care) would be determined to be consistent with Master Development Plan for the Park Place DRI if the use were also to be determined to be consistent with the IRT zoning district. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is no outstanding Code Enforcement issue associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3- 913.A: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of December 6, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB). Findings of Fact. The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 7.394 -acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of Drew Street and Park Place Boulevard within the Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI); 2. That the subject property is zoned Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District with an underlying Industrial Limited (IL) Future Land Use category; 3. That the applicant proposes to establish a stand -alone retail sales and services use (child care) where it would otherwise only be permissible as an accessory use within a building used for a minimum standard use; 4. That the development proposal does not require any deviations from applicable minimum lot area requirements, minimum lot width requirements, minimum setback requirements, maximum building height, minimum off - street parking requirements, and /or any landscape code requirements; and 5. That there are no active Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007 -11032 — Page 7 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of December 6, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB). Findings of Fact. The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 7.394 -acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of Drew Street and Park Place Boulevard within the Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI); 2. That the subject property is zoned Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District with an underlying Industrial Limited (IL) Future Land Use category; 3. That the applicant proposes to establish a stand -alone retail sales and services use (child care) where it would otherwise only be permissible as an accessory use within a building used for a minimum standard use; 4. That the development proposal does not require any deviations from applicable minimum lot area requirements, minimum lot width requirements, minimum setback requirements, maximum building height, minimum off - street parking requirements, and /or any landscape code requirements; and 5. That there are no active Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007 -11032 — Page 7 Conclusions of Law. The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Master Development Plan for the Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI); 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria for the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District as per Community Development Code Sections 2- 1301.1 and 2 -1304; 3. That the development proposal will be consistent with the Flexibility Criteria for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects as per Community Development Code Section 2- 1304.C, provided that the attached conditions of approval are met; and 4. That the development proposal will be consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3- 913.A, provided that the attached conditions of approval are met. Based upon the above and subject to the attached conditions, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval for a Retail Sales and Services use (child care) as a principal use where it would otherwise only be permissible as an accessory use within the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment project pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2- 1304.C. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all outstanding comments of the Engineering Department shall be addressed; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, revised architectural elevations shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review /approval that are consistent with the building at the easternmost portion of the subject property and that meet a substantial number of the design elements set forth in design objective (d); 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, a floor plan shall be provided that is consistent with the site plan with regard to building size /dimensions and playground size /dimensions; and 4. That all future signage associated with the development and/or tenant spaces be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the buildings and be consistent with the materials and colors of the buildings. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Exhibits "A" and `B" ❑ Location Map ❑ Aerial Map ❑ Future Land Use Map • Zoning Map • Existing Surrounding Uses Map ❑ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIPark Place Blvd 63 The Learning Experience (IRT & DRI) 01 -15 -08 RI1Park Place Blvd 63 -Staff Report 01- 15- 08.doc Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007 -11032 — Page 8 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562 -4539 robert.tefft(ab,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida. March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in -depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs /services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board — January 15, 2008 FLD2007 -11032 — Page 9 ' s1-o / ' | ` m T| | T . � / | | 7500M �� | | | ' | ' | 03.01 09.01 T.O. PARAPET AT HIGHEST POINT AT LOWEST POINT LIGN "WAVE" AT CORNERS E D C � �I ' H5 0111 1 2 I I IALIGN "WAVE" AT CORNERS iF 0 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION - plk rlAL. --IV 't C Ea' ) SCALE: 1/8" = I'-01' 1 1 ! I I ' 19' -51/2' 19' -0' AhCA 1 09.01 T1•p 03.02 TIM 08.01 Trp .03.03 TTP 07AI 09.01 TYP 08.01 1 I �ELEV : 20' -0" 1 ' � Jr 1 T.O. PARAPET A ' 1 1 IJ I ELEV : 13' -I" O s ° ...........___ ............................ ......................... .._... _.... _. +- ..-- �'" " "_, 1 . � nA—i o . - o ,..�,_ - ...,,.�... � N o °,,.� -• -- .............._.. .�� 1 T.O. REVEAL AT HI GHEST POINT - -• ELEV -2" a 1 1 a. 0 - 1 �n ,: a' - 1 B.O. REVEAL AT LOWEST POINT ( 1 O I I IALIGN "WAVE" AT CORNERS iF 0 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION - plk rlAL. --IV 't C Ea' ) SCALE: 1/8" = I'-01' 1 1 ! I I 4 E BRIGADOO /Z E� 0 PROJECT 0 SITE ------ DRBV Moll 0 ONE 0 Cambridge Cir. LU > < LOCATION MAP Owner: Offices at Park Place, LLC Case: FLD2007-11032 Site: 63 Park Place Boulevard Property 7.394 Size(Acres): Atlas 291 A Page: PIN: 17-29-16-85546-000-0011 0 W C 300 230 Q z RM � RM 240 5 Ac U. /?/OS s 200 N DREW S T 76 N O 73 6 93 y 2 IL RLM R/OG Q. .Q 100 c� �< T 546 21 FUTURE LAND USE MAP Owner: Offices at Park Place, LLC Case: FLD2007 -11032 Site: 63 Park Place Boulevard Property 7.394 Size Acres : Atlas 291A Page: PIN: 17- 29 -16- 85546 - 000 -0011 j a 30o Q 230 MDR � OS /R 5 A° I LZ 200 8D � � N 8 N DREW S T �6 N N O 83 Q 73 2 &? 93 Q y 21 Z Y O IRT MHP ,ao .16 2s X5546 _j ZONING MAP Owner: Offices at Park Place, LLC Case: FLD2007 -11032 Site: 63 Park Place Boulevard Property 7.394 Size Acres : Atlas 291A Pa e: PIN: 17-29-16-85546-000-0011 21 Uj 300 Q b h 230 Q z ` z ASSISTED 20 LIVING 5 Ac OUTDOO FACILITY RECREATION/ENTEI TAINMENT 200 80 0 � 0 N N DREW S T 76 N N O1 83 3 ATTACHED 73 2 DWELLING 93 y � 2 Y 2 MOBILE N Q. z HOME co Q LIGHT = PARK -p �-o 1 INDUSTRIAL 100 ry6 �� 5y ?s L 5546 J 2� EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: Offices at Park Place, LLC Case: FLD2007 -11032 Site: 63 Park Place Boulevard Property 7.394 Size Acres : Atlas 291A Pa e: PIN: 17-29-16-85546-000-0011 0 0 Looking northwest from subject property towards the intersection of Drew Street and Park Place Boulevard. aisle where it abuts area to contain proposed child care use. industrial use (Bausch & Lomb) Looking west from subject property toward Park Place Boulevard and neighboring multi - family residential use. Looking east across subject property where proposed child care use is to be located. where it abuts area to contain proposed child care use. 63 Park Place Boulevard FLD2007 -11032 i CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, January 15, 2008, beginning at 1:00 pm, in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Goral Tov ADA Compliant, LTD (E.D. Armstrong III, Esquire) are requesting Development approval for termination of status as a nonconformity for a Retail Sales & Service use (shopping center) within the Industrial, Research & Technology (IRT) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Sections 2- 1304.0 and 6 -109 along with a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to CDC Sec. 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Offices, Retail Sales and Services, Restaurants, and Vehicle Service.) at 1500, 1510, 1520, 1530, 1540, 1550, 1560, 1570, 1580, 1590, 1600, 1610 and 1620 McMullen Booth Rd, South Oaks Fashion Square Lot 1. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner 111. FLD2007 -11033 2. Offices at Park Place LLC. (Richard Harris, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval for a Retail Sales and Service use (child care) as a principal use where it would otherwise only be permissible as an accessory use within the Industrial, Research & Technology (IRT) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 1304.C.. [Proposed Use: Retail Sales and Services (Child Care)] at 63 Park Place Boulevard, Storz Ophthalmics, Inc., Park Place Lot 1 less that part desc beg NE Cor of SD lot 1 TH . Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2007 -11032 3. Abdol Kheiriddine (Renee Ruggiero, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit a retail sales /service and office use in the Commercial (C) District within the Downtown East Gateway Character District with a reduction to the required front (south) setback from 25 ft to zero feet (to steps), a reduction to the required front (west) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6 feet (to parking lot), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to parking lot), an increase in the allowable building height from 25 ft to 36 ft (to parapet) and a reduction to the required parking spaces from 41 spaces to 33 spaces under the provision of Sec. 2- 704.C. and a reduction to the required front (south) landscape buffer from 15 ft to zero ft, a reduction to the required front (west) landscape buffer from 10 ft to 1 foot, a reduction to the required side (north) landscape buffer from 12 ft to six feet, a reduction to the required side (east) landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft, a reduction to the required foundation landscaping from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to required interior landscape from 10 percent to 8 percent under the provisions of a Comprehensive Landscape Program per Sec. 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Retail Sales and Services and Office) at 1310 Cleveland St, Brookwood Terrace. Blk 2 Lots 26 & 29 -33. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner Il. FLD2007 -09029 4. Salt Block 57, LLC, formerly owned by Inidgo Beach, LLC, formerly known as TW/Beach Residences — Clearwater, LLC. (E.D. Armstrong III, Esq. and Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6 -109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units in the Tourist (T) District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 10 feet to 6 feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 3 feet (to sidewalk) and to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to 8 feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building, a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street and to allow a two -year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 803.C; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of 8 total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Ave, one dwelling unit from 625 -627 Bay Esplanade and 3 dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 4 -1402. (Proposed Use: 230 Overnight Accommodation units) at 430 South Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd- White - Skinner Sub Lots 33, 34 & 35 & pt of lot 36 & Subm Land on W per O.R. 765/542 All Desc . Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2007- 11034 /TDR2005 -05022 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that parry status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http:// clearwater .granicus.comNiewPublisher.php ?view id =11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 01/03/08 FLD ?007- 11032; 154 • ' et ACKERMAN, JAMES A AKERS, THOMAS F ALLEN, CAROL D ACKERMAN, LORRAINE AKERS, AURORA G 1 HAMPTON RD 100 HAMPTON RD # 92 100 HAMPTON RD # 37 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3910 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3956 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3952 ALLEN, JACK L ANGEL, RICHARD DANIEL ARNOLD, FRANCIS WILLIAM 100 HAMPTON RD # 238 100 HAMPTON RD # 20 ARNOLD, MARGARET ROSE GRACE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3967 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3951 100 HAMPTON RD # 165 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3961 BALDWIN, STANLEY A BARLOW, GLENN B BARNES, ROBERT C BALDWIN, BONNIE J BARLOW, DONNA M BARNES, NANCY A 100 HAMPTON RD # 156 100 HAMPTON RD # 296 100 HAMPTON RD # 157 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3914 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3935 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3914 BARTLETT TRUST BASTIEN, ROGER FERN BAUSCH & LOMB SURGICAL 100 HAMPTON RD # 208 100 HAMPTON RD # 294 21 N PARK PLACE BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3932 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3927 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3917 BENMARK, KENNETH G BENNETT, JOHN A BENT, CHARLES H CLARK, LALETITIA L BENT, YVONNE T 100 HAMPTON RD # 80 100 HAMPTON RD # 240 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3954 100 HAMPTON RD # 231 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3933 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3967 BILODEAU, HERMAN N EST BOISVERT, RENE BOOTH, OLIN H 100 HAMPTON RD # 56 BOISVERT, SUZANNE BOOTH, PATRICIA A CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3912 100 HAMPTON RD # 108 100 HAMPTON RD # 195 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3959 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3963 BROWN ASSOC LTD II BROWN, MELINDA A BROWN -19 LLC KENNEDY ASSOC LTD 100 HAMPTON RD # 63 17757 US HIGHWAY 19 N # 275 PO BOX 1021 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3912 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6592 LARGO FL 33779 - 1021 BRUST, EILEEN P BURBANK, MELBA TRUST BURKE, MARY E BRUST, GAIL BURBANK, MELBA THE BURKE, ROBERT Q 100 HAMPTON RD # 298 100 HAMPTON RD # 10 100 HAMPTON RD # 7 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3969 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3950 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3911 CAMPBELL, WILLIAM J CARMICHAEL, WILLIAM R CATHEY, JAMES E CAMPBELL, BARBARA R CARMICHAEL, CELESTINE A CATHEY, DIANA M 100 HAMPTON RD # 146 100 HAMPTON RD # 34 100 HAMPTON RD # 29 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3914 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3951 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3951 CHAMBERLAIN, JOHN J CHAMBERLAIN, VERNA MAE CLEARWATER -PARK ASSOCIATES CHAMBERLAIN, MILDRED 100 HAMPTON RD # 1 10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD # 1300 100 HAMPTON RD # 69 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - LOS ANGELES CA 90067 - 4114 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3954 CLEVELAND, WAYNE R COSTANZA, THERESA V CULBERTSON, FLORENCE M CLEVELAND, THERESA 100 HAMPTON RD # 235 100 HAMPTON RD # 104 100 HAMPTON RD # 183 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3967 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3958 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3962 CUSTY, KEITH J CUTLER, SIDNEY M DAVIS, WILLIAM H SR CUSTY, KAREN A CUTLER, LILLIAN M DAVIS, BONNIE F 100 HAMPTON RD # 229 100 HAMPTON RD # 150 100 HAMPTON RD # 78 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3966 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3914 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3954 DAWSON, FRANCISCA G DERHAMMER, PAUL J DUDA, LOREN G 100 HAMPTON RD # 121 DERHAMMER, DIANA J 100 HAMPTON RD # 283 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3913 100 HAMPTON RD # 136 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3968 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3960 ECKER, EUGENE C & LEOTA M EDWARDS, ELGIN C DUMOND, GRACE E 100 HAMPTON FL # 62 REVD EDWARDS, CAROL E ECKER, EUGENE C THE 100 HAMPTON RD # 140 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3912 100 HAMPTON RD # 145 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3960 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3914 ELLIS, FRANK J ESTERLY, ROBERT B FAITH REVIVALS INC ELLIS, MARJORIE L ESTERLY, CAROLE R 500 TINGLEY AVE 100 HAMPTON RD # 252 100 HAMPTON RD # 181 MANSFIELD OH 44905 - 1234 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3934 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3962 FENWICK, JACK C FINLAY, WILLIAM M FITE, JERRY R FENWICK, ARLENE FINLAY, JUDITH A FITE, SANDRA L 100 HAMPTON RD # 102 100 HAMPTON RD # 263 100 HAMPTON RD # 114 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3957 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3934 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3959 FITZGERALD, KYLE B FLICK, KEVIN P FOGELSONGER, PATRICIA A ANN C 110 DAVID AVE FLICK, 100 HAMPTON RD # 276 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4001 26 SHADOW CREEK WAY CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3968 ORMOND BEACH FL 32174 - 6770 GABRIEL, ROBERT G GABRIEL, MARGARET A 7 HAMPTON RD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3910 GOLDSBERRY, CHRISTOBEL D 100 HAMPTON RD # 19 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3951 GAY, RICHARD R GERRY, DONALD K GAY, JUDY A GERRY, BRENDA A 100 HAMPTON RD # 196 100 HAMPTON RD # 250 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3963 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3934 GOLDSBERRY, JUDITH M GORNEY, ROSEMARY 100 HAMPTON RD # 96 100 HAMPTON RD # 45 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3957 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3952 GRAY, FREDERICK W GREER, JESSIE J HAMPTON ROAD DEV LLP GRAY, DORIS N 100 HAMPTON RD # 257 107 HAMPTON RD STE 200 100 HAMPTON RD # 71 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3934 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4960 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - HARLEY, ARTHUR J SR HERRING, CLIFFORD EARL HILL, KENNETH C 100 HAMPTON RD # 206 100 HAMPTON RD # 310 HILL, PHYLLIS J CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3932 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3970 100 HAMPTON RD # 220 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3965 HOWARD, ONNALLEE G HUNT, GEORGE A ISLAND IN THE SUN CO -OP INC HANNAH 100 HAMPTON RD # 286 HUNT, 100 HAMPTON RD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3935 100 HAMPTON RD # 155 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3927 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3914 JACKSON, ARTHUR A JARRETT, GEORGE R JOHNSON, MARGRETHE M JACKSON, BETTY D JARRETT, DARYL E 100 HAMPTON RD # 57 100 HAMPTON RD # 85 100 HAMPTON RD # 59 - CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3912 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3955 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3912 JOHNSTONE, KEITH A KEARNEY, SHARON A KELLER, ARTHUR V JOHNSTONE GAELE E KELLER LORRAINE M ' 100 HAMPTON RD # 320 100 HAMPTON RD # 239 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3970 100 HAMPTON RD # 205 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3967 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3932 KENNEY, PATRICIA M KERR, JOSEPH ORVILLE KOONTER, RONALD L 100 HAMPTON RD # 93 KERR, CATHERINE YVONNE KOONTER, JUDY E CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3957 100 HAMPTON RD # 113 100 HAMPTON RD # 81 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3959 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3954 KOPSOLIAS, TRESSAH G LEDUC, LEONARD D LEHMANN REVOCABLE TRUST 100 HAMPTON RD # 253 LEDUC, ROSE M LEHMANN, LILYAN THE CLEARWATER R 33759 - 3934 100 HAMPTON RD # 160 100 HAMPTON RD # 11. CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3961 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3950 LOGAN, MARLENE J LUCAS, MICHAEL E MAC DONALD, LLOYD WALLACE COTTON, ANNA M 100 HAMPTON RD # 41 MAC DONALD, ROSALIE JEAN 100 HAMPTON RD # 75 100 HAMPTON RD # 304 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3954 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3952 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3969 MACKEY, JOHN A MATTHEWS, JERRY K MC CARTHY, EARL E MACKEY, WILMA R MATTHEWS, GAIL A MC CARTHY, BEVERLEY M 100 HAMPTON RD # 141 100 HAMPTON RD # 122 100 HAMPTON RD # 217 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3960 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3913 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3965 MC EACHERN, KENNETH G MC KENZIE, JOSEPH A MC NEIL, LARRY H MC EACHERN, BARBARA A MC KENZIE, ELLEN JOYCE MC NEIL, ARLENE R 100 HAMPTON RD # 101 100 HAMPTON RD # 88 100 HAMPTON RD # 262 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3957 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3956 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3934 MECKE, FRED E MILES -ROYAL BREEZE MILITELLO, JAMES A MECKE, ELIZABETH A MILITELLO, PATRICIA A 100 HAMPTON RD # 255 PO BOX 262315 100 HAMPTON RD # 166 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3934 TAMPA FL 33685 - 2315 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3961 MOORE, JUDITH C MORRISON, ARTHUR J MORRISSETTE, WILLIAM R 100 HAMPTON RD # 270 MORRISON, MARILYN M MORRISSETTE, IRIS M CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3934 100 HAMPTON RD # 74 100 HAMPTON RD # 209 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3954 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3932 NAUHEIMER, ROGER NESCO, RICHARD R NEWMAN, ROBERT F NAUHEIMER, JOYCE T NESCO, KAREN J NEWMAN, DOROTHY L 100 HAMPTON RD # 185 100 HAMPTON RD # 179 100 HAMPTON RD # 46 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3962 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3962 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3952 NOLFO, JANET L REVOCABLE LIVIN NORDAHL, LEIF A OBENAUF, PAUL F NOLFO, JANET L THE OBENAUF, ROXANE E 100 HAMPTON RD # 212 100 HAMPTON RD # 277 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3932 100 HAMPTON RD # 153 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3968 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3914 OFFICES AT PARK PLACE LLC PANTELARAS, PAVLOS C PAPATHANASOPOULOS, NICHOLAS 4500 140TH AVE N # 101 JACKSON, DEBRA D PAPATHANASOPOULOS, ELEANOR CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 3848 100 HAMPTON RD # 182 D CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3962 100 HAMPTON RD # 309 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3969 PARK ISLE CONDO DEV PARK PLACE LAND LTD PAYNE, JOHN B REVOCABLE 2828 CORAL WAY # 200 171 MONTCLAIR AVE 1575 NORTHSIDE DR NW STE 200 CORAL GABLES FL 33145 - CIRCLEVILLE OH 43113 - 1251 ATLANTA GA 30318 - PINELLAS BD OF PUB INST PISANO, GENEVIEVE PLATT, ALLEN I PO BOX 2942 100 HAMPTON RD # 187 PLATT, MARIA P LARGO FL 33779 - 2942 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3962 100 HAMPTON RD # 251 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3927 PLATTEN, JAMES E POERIO, JAMES L PREE, WILLIAM A PLATTEN, HELEN D PREE, SARAH J 100 HAMPTON RD # 211 100 HAMPTON RD # 87 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3932 100 HAMPTON RD # 313 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3956 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3970 PRENDERGAST, KAREN O PREVETTE, LAWRENCE E JR PRICE, JOHN B 100 HAMPTON RD # 248 PREVETTE, CAROLYN J 6368 OTTER DR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3934 200 DAVID AVE DADE CITY FL 33523 - 8976 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4003 QUINN, RUTH F READY, JAMES M RICH, JUANA R DORIS T 100 HAMPTON RD # 233 READY, 100 HAMPTON RD # 53 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3967 100 HAMPTON RD # 130 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3953 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3913 RICHARDSON, CHARLES D ROBERTS, WAYNE A ROBINSON, KATHARINE A RICHARDSON, NORMA J SHARP, DIANE C 100 HAMPTON RD # 204 100 HAMPTON RD # 189 2743 COUNTRY WOODS LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3964 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3962 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6414 SHOOP, KENNETH R SIEGERT, EVELYN MAE SIMARD, KIMBERLY J SHOOP, SARA A MODESTO, MARIO D 100 HAMPTON RD # 180 100 HAMPTON RD # 214 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3962 100 HAMPTON RD # 271 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3965 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3934 STONE, THOMAS E STONE, AUDREY M 100 HAMPTON RD # 288 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - TAYLOR, DOROTHY ROSE DUNCAN, CHERYLYN ROSE 100 HAMPTON RD # 139 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3960 TOVAR, JEAN E 100 HAMPTON RD # 125 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3913 TYHURST, KATHLEEN R REVOCABLE 100 HAMPTON RD # 186 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3962 VEZINA, RITA B VEZINA, PIERRE 100 HAMPTON RD # 115 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3959 WALKER, CHARLES E 100 HAMPTON RD # 112 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3959 WHITE, BLANCHE E 100 HAMPTON RD # 118 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3959 WILLIAMS, GARY L 100 HAMPTON RD # 244 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3933 STOREY, JOSEPHINE M 100 HAMPTON RD # 164 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3961 TILTON, RICHARD 0 TILTON, SHIRLEY G 100 HAMPTON RD # 273 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3968 TROISE, PASQUALE J TROISE, ANGELINA M 100 HAMPTON RD # 66 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3912 VALENTINO, AURELIO A VALENTINO, ANNA H 100 HAMPTON RD # 311 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3970 VITERELLI, REGINA E LA BERGE, REGINA L 100 HAMPTON RD # 224 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3966 WEATHERS, LAWRENCE H WEATHERS, JANET S 100 HAMPTON RD # 237 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3967 WIGGINTON, JERRI T 100 HAMPTON RD # 106 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3959 WISNEWSKI, ROBERT P WISNEWSKI, ROSEMARY K 100 HAMPTON RD # 194 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3963 STRAUSS,RUDOLPH STRAUSS, FLORENCE 100 HAMPTON RD # 25 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3951 TODD, ALBERT JOHN IV 3565 SANDHILL LN PORTAGE MI 49024 - 5515 TWOMEY, STEPHEN J TWOMEY, DIANA M 100 HAMPTON RD # 170 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3961 VAN DEURSEN, BEVERLY 100 HAMPTON RD # 94 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3957 VOSS, JAMES R VOSS, DONNA MAE 100 HAMPTON RD # 9 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3950 WEYMOUTH, DAWN M 100 HAMPTON RD # 79 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3954 WILKINSON, LYNDA J 100 HAMPTON RD # 261 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3934 WRIGHT, THOMAS R WRIGHT, MARLYS E 100 HAMPTON RD # 65 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3912 YUSKA, MICHAEL A ZAFFUTO, ANGELO A ZAFFUTO, VINCENT G JR YUSKA, LOUISE F ZAFFUTO, IRENE 100 HAMPTON RD # 128 100 HAMPTON RD # 15 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3927 100 HAMPTON RD # 225 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3950 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3966 Richard Harris, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. 13825 Icot Boulevard, Suite 605, Clearwater, FL 33760 Prgperty Appraiser General Information: -17 /29/16/85546/000 /0011 Card 0 Page 1 of 2 Interactive Map of this parcel Back to Querk .esults New Search Tax Collector Informa,___. Question/Comment about this page 17/29/16/85546/000 /0011 Data Current as of December 24, 2007 [ 10:37 am Monday December 24] Vacant Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print ' Property Use: 290' STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE PT OF LOT 1 DESC BEG NE COR OF SD LOT 1 TH SOOD19' 21'E 380.43FT TH S89D53' 14'W 96.87FT TH S44D53' 14'W 15.25FT TH S89D53' 14'W 75FT TH N44D32'l FW 15.117T TH S89D53'14'W 619.02FT TH S56D20'58'W 28.44FT TH CUR RT RAD 610 FT ARC 142.72FT CB NO3D12'3 5'W 142.39FT TH CUR LT RAD 690FT ARC 41.3FT CB NO1D46142'E 41.29FT TH NOOD03'49'E 190.21FT TH N45DO3'49'E 35.36FT TH S89D56'l FE 815.22FT TO POB Click. here for short..l:egal.._ *_ *. 2007 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2007 Value 2007 Tax Information Comparable Sales value based on sales from 2005- Tax District: CW 2006: $0 Millage: 19.9371 Just/Market Value: $2,022,000 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $2,022,000 Taxes: $40,312.80 History Taxable Value: $2,022,000 Taxes without Save - Our -Homes cap: $40,312.80 A significant taxable value increase may occur when Taxes without any exemptions: $40,312.80 sold. Click here for details. Owner /Mailing Address Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U V/1 OFFICES AT PARK PLACE 2006 15309/991 $2,500,000 Q V LLC C/O PAUL ENGELHARDT Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) 4500 140TH AVE N # 101. 1992 109/ 01.0 - 011 CLEARWATER FL 33762- 3848 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Vacant Industrial 1.5.309/099 1_ (40) Census Tract: .00 Evacuation Zone: NON -EVAC Land Information Seawall: Frontage: None View: Land Use Land Size Unit Value Units Method Vacant Industrial(40) 8.50 279,690.19 S Sewage Disposal, Solid Waste, borrow nits, drain (96) 1,000.00 .97 A http:// www. pcpao.org /general_vadet.php ?pn= 1629178554600000110 12/24/2007 Property Appraiser General Information: 17/29/16/85546/000 /0011 Card 0 Page 2 of 2 Vacant Extra Features ,YJ Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year No Extra Features on Record adius (feet): 1000 ��Ikerials: ?None *12000 Transparency: 0.5 Update Map If you do not see an aerial photo the SVG viewer has not been installed. Click here for information and installation. How to copy and paste a static map using Internet Explorer: Right -click on the map; Select "Copy SVG "; Open a Word document; Select "Paste Special" from Edit menu on toolbar; Select Bitmap, then OK How to copy and paste a static map using Mozilla Firefox: Right -click on the map; Select "This Frame "; Select "Open Frame in New Window"; Print from the new window. Interactive Map of this parcel Back to Query Results New Search Tax Collector Information Question/Comment about this page http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ vadet.php ?pn = 1629178554600000110 12/24/2007 Florida Statutes 402.305 Licensing standards; Child care facilities (4) STAFF -TO- CHILDREN RATIO. (a) Minimum standards for the care of children in a licensed child care facility as established by rule of the department must include: 1. For children from birth through 1 year of age, there must be one child care personnel for every four children. 2. For children 1 year of age or older, but under 2 years of age, there must be one child care personnel for every six children. 3. For children 2 years of age or older, but under 3 years of age, there must be one child care personnel for every 11 children. 4. For children 3 years of age or older, but under 4 years of age, there must be one child care personnel for every 15 children. 5. For children 4 years of age or older, but under 5 years of age, there must be one child care personnel for every 20 children. 6. For children 5 years of age or older, there must be one child care personnel for every 25 children. 7. When children 2 years of age and older are in care, the staff -to- children ratio shall be based on the age group with the largest number of children within the group. (b) This subsection does not apply to nonpublic schools and their integral programs as defined in s. 402.3025(2)(d)l. In addition, an individual participating in a community service program activity under s. 445.024(1)(e), or a work experience activity under s. 445.024(1)(f), at a child care facility may not be considered in calculating the staff -to- children ratio. (5) PHYSICAL FACILITIES. -- Minimum standards shall include requirements for building conditions, indoor play space, outdoor play space, napping space, bathroom facilities, food preparation facilities, outdoor equipment, and indoor equipment. Because of the nature and duration of drop -in child care, outdoor play space and outdoor equipment shall not be required for licensure; however, if such play space and equipment are provided, then the minimum standards shall apply to drop -in child care. With respect to minimum standards for physical facilities of a child care program for school -age children which is operated in a public school facility, the department shall adopt the State Uniform Building Code for Public Educational Facilities Construction as the minimum standards, regardless of the operator of the program. The Legislature intends that if a child care program for school -age children is operated in a public school, the program need not conform to standards for physical facilities other than the standards adopted by the Commissioner of Education. (6) SQUARE FOOTAGE PER child. -- Minimum standards shall be established by the department by rule. (a) A child care facility that holds a valid license on October 1, 1992, must have a minimum of 20 square feet of usable indoor floor space for each child and a minimum of 45 square feet of usable outdoor play area for each child. Outdoor play area shall be calculated at the rate of 45 feet per child in any group using the play area at one time. A minimum play area shall be provided for one half of the licensed capacity. This standard applies as long as the child care facility remains licensed at the site occupied on October 1, 1992, and shall not be affected by any change in the ownership of the site. (b) A child care facility that does not hold a valid license on October 1, 1992, and seeks regulatory approval to operate as a child care facility must have a minimum of 35 square feet of usable floor space for each child and a minimum of 45 square feet of usable outdoor play area for each child. The minimum standard for outdoor play area does not apply in calculating square footage for children under 1 year of age. However, appropriate outdoor infant equipment shall be substituted for outdoor play space. The centers shall provide facilities and equipment conducive to the physical activities appropriate for the age and physical development of the child. SECTION 4.3.3 (E) (E) Child Care Facilities: (See Subsection (T) Re: Family Day Care) (1) Lot Area: The minimum lot area shall be 7,500 square feet. (2) Floor Area: Facilities shall contain a minimum floor area of 35 square feet per child, exclusive of space devoted to bathrooms, halls, kitchen, offices, and storage. (3) Outdoor Area: There shall be a minimum area of 75 square feet of outdoor play area per child. The play area shall be located on the same lot as the principal use and shall not be located in the front yard setback or adjacent to any outdoor storage area. The play area shall be surrounded by a six -foot high fence or wall. (4) Loading Area: A pickup and drop -off area for children shall be provided in a convenient area adjacent to the building and shall provide clear ingress and egress to the building. (5) Other Regulations: All child care facilities shall comply with State and County regulations. (F) Adult Day Care Facilities: All provisions of 4.3.3(E) shall apply except as follows: (1) No outdoor play area needs to be provided. (2) The minimum floor area requirements shall be based upon adults instead of children. (G) Continuing Care Facilities: See the definition of "Continuing Care" for clarification of terms and qualifying standards. (1) Floor Area: (a) Common Area: A minimum of 10% of the total floor area shall be devoted to a common area wherein a variety of recreational activities may occur. This floor area shall be calculated exclusive of halls, corridors, stairs, elevator shafts, garages, and balconies. (b) Nonresidential Use: The floor area utilized for activities other than residential, recreational, and those related to group dining shall not exceed 10% of the total floor area. (2) Facilities: (a) A sleeping room and separate bathroom facilities shall be provided for any staff member required to remain on the premises overnight. 4.3 -15 Property Appraiser General Information: 17/29/16/85546/000 /0011 Card 0 Page 1 of 2 Inferactive Map of this parcel Back to Qneik_.csults New Search Tax Collector Informat._. Question/Comment about this pge t 17/29/16/85546/000 /0011 Data Current as of November 06, 2007 [10:41 am Tuesday November 6] Vacant Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Property Use: 290 STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE PT OF LOT 1 DESC BEG NE COR OF SD LOT 1 TH SOOD19' ** Click here for full legal ** 2007 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2007 Value 2007 Tax Information Comparable Sales value based on sales from 2005- Tax District: CW 2006: $0 Millage: 19.9371 Just/Market Value: $2,022,000 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $2,022,000 Taxes: $40,312.80 History Taxable Value: $2,022,000 Taxes without Save - Our -Homes cap: $40,312.80 A significant taxable value increase may occur when. Taxes without any exemptions: $40,312.80 sold. Click here for details. Owner /Mailing Address Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U V/I OFFICES AT PARK PLACE 2006 15309/991 $2,500,000 Q V LLC C/O PAUL ENGELHARDT Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) 4500 140TH AVE N # 101 1992 109/ 01.0 - 011 CLEARWATER FL 33762- _.... ...... .... ___.... ......_............___......... 3848 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Vacant Industrial 15309/0991 (40) Census Tract: .00 Evacuation Zone: NON -EVAC Seawall: Land Information Frontage: None Land Use Vacant Industrial(40) Sewage Disposal, Solid Waste, borrow pits, drain (96) View: Land Size Unit Value Units Method 8.50 279,690.19 S 1,000.00 .97 A http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ vadet.php ?pn = 1629178554600000110 11/6/2007 Property Appraiser General Information: 17/29/16/85546/000 /0011 Card 0 Vacant Extra Features Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units Total NewValue No Extra Features on Record Page 2 of 2 Depreciated Value Year adius (feet): 2529 erials: None 2000 ransparency: 0.5 Update Map )w to copy and paste a static map using Internet Explorer: Right -click on the map; Select "Copy SVG "; Open a Word document; Select aste Special" from Edit menu on toolbar; Select Bitmap, then OK )w to copy and paste a static map using Mozilla Firefox: Right -click on the map; Select "This Frame "; Select "Open Frame in New indow "; Print from the new window. Interactive Map of this parcel Back to Query Results New Search Tax Collector Information Question/Comment about this page http:// www. pcpao.org /general_vadet.php ?pn= 1629178554600000110 11/6/2007 ORIGINAL EC 4ED -; C�2 2007 plAtMI►NG DEPARTMENT CITK OF CLERRWXTER -- - -- � East. Elevation:__. r------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -ti Z West Elevation a•- ,Q c_____________________________ _____________________________�. `A gilb Elevation -_ -_ ___________________________ ______________________________� ��j1Sa�.ut�hT, Elevation. • - - a III Jarmel Kizel ELEVATIONS A -5 I - v ziiI ran 1 ,-- e qE 553 Hll @p g 4YfE.2T 4P4 43 f f Y i i I [ 1 ,-- e qE 553 Hll @p g 4YfE.2T 4P4 43 f f Y i i I [ Z DEC 14 2007 PLNNING DWAR MENT CRY OF CLEARWATER ®RIGIM RECEM DEC 14 2007 PLNNING DWAR MENT CRY OF CLEARWATER g ; a k Ill Fi � M k \f.� 1 •'I H:Y:, LE!IA;I _Ji I'lll I' I _ . -• I If! II mtlkE i i 7: i I(I 'll ?zM. yr EY m1 3� K III., xl ' ii mei: k �� i ii °Tye{,5I ':i I I I Ri- Y[F I II I AllzxI !I IAi �II v� .• i AR' I I ' JI �' �U 'f 'i ° i I 1 9:I,i ii i j hi ym i Iu6j ti ui I r�l iF I I I �I I 11 1 r III 4: 1 l !!! i I I f tr�li. U - I it I Y G' 11 AEt p I Y. 1 v W'; I 11 I� III i x; s t �I 3 �I 7C'mi d � - ��t?r"' l I I 1 i i ��- i'B.^['c � I 1 �u � trui� ! I I• i =;.�t. I I I� �11 • :�c <� e I I I �� P I a fiA I �� I I I' 6a kfi A 6111 �.� F . % "', }6�' QQ - 2: ;AI til qi .till II IAAAG^ :;: I p I I II P PI ,1JYY��d d �ifJY7:ri `® p I I : 1 I I wy 1 7 71R PJ I- -: I I -� •- R rn I I G ,' ' ,Ill I I I I I I ILLLLLL16 I ^ � tea] � •`9: .i' � UU It I;I vl ( i'AA j� NxN� L '�Y ; >, mZ 1 � � `�3 r: I I � !RI 'ly Fi7l. � 1 I I • �n I I I 1 lj (A61�Ii1 �v�N., a ii 1i;;l.g I i�7!-yySA = ii = II C .. I6 . .yp nl,. I ' i > Y 4 1Y'k2 -> I elf ; I)ft -- I I W •IY-. `m '�° �i. > ":t I I W !i,� .:. In l i i z A ilY "l ,9i — -1 Om I',P:a•:.jd j'I:1'ri !:r NC' II It; ?Ei:o^:; iI N�IIU.:!. "•: I - -1 N "'ll n;I 6: 113 e!�T,is[ II l l 17iG1 i'II �' MLI('F. >v! -! 't I I w:{LL,. , �0 6. IIIIY:�:EF41 I I --v Ilia :!p• Lr.l 6dl uapula � �ICIII�',. a7 .441 �idl IGmfi Y a �n �p _z �C O z b z Qt�� (� + +?, -f* -1 f I 1 ,11 I ° 19 111 4 tall p, &%q Jill j � III 81 1% m aim F q1 ti 00 1 a 4 VOHO ®Do w� p" "- ° pp z "� z e° t z a zl T o M UP a 2� O Pit M Z -9 IY p� ����$Syy` lk 11fj�yY�YY'[Gk y r . e� 1p 2L511 Cc1Yp w� p" "- ° pp z "� z e° t z a zl T o M Q n 4� eon a 2� O M Z -9 2L511 Cc1Yp �e�E. fe�' k n Q n 4� 9 M Z -9 9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PMT a LOT I, STon OPM A.M N PARK PLACE. ACCOImWG TO ME MAP M RAT MEREO'rL ackO t RAT 8004 1a9, PAGE 10 R ME RIMO FECMOS A PIN[LLAS COIWiY, FL01roA BFWG YU✓E PMIgANRY MS06BED AS FOLLONS BEM AT TIE M TIEMT COMR OF SAO LOT 1; THENQ S00' "T-, ALd1O ME EAST LNE d' SAO LOT I, ,16013 FEET: THENCE tEA-G SAD EMT L.E. !LnWl4•'R., K87 FEET: ]HENCE S44WWIL. Isn MT'. THENCE S693TWIL, MOO FEET: aWta N4417•11w. 1510 FEEL; O¢ArE 5685]'14.11, 6X10] SECT: THENCE 556�0'S6'R., M" FEET TO A POR Ott M TEST UE a SAO LOT I, X50 B A N TANGDIT OWVE aNGVE EAS 1. HAVAIG A RA or 61000 FEET: THENCE 10111TH 0Y ALONG SAD OWLS 142-72 EEEI T W A MMx ANOE Or IJ84.16' (010D MAMG N.031znb. 142.5 FEET) TO A Po94T OF aEwm 4mVE OONCAVE TESIEALY HAVMO A RAOMS OF 69000 MT.. av'E 011116a1E ALONG SAD ZEST IpE ME FOILO'NNO 3 MOaSS 1) NOInEMY ALONG SAD OOK 400 FEET 11010101 A CENTRAL MOLE OF 01]5'46• (WO R0 EEADNC N.M-46'4M,41.29 FEETk 2) TO X.0003'49 -L. IM21 FEET: 3) MMM N.45VYWE, nM FEET TO ME ttol AST CORNER OF SAO LOT I: MFNCE Sa936.11'E, ALONG ME HOLM TINE OF SAO LOT 1. Mn FEET TO TIE P T OF EE-0. C011TAr6NG 7.394 ACK5. YOiE OR LESS XRrt, TIE LEGAL MSCI6PRM SH M1 A LIES 'MOLLY MR6N TIE OESOMTIM AS 910FeN N FaaOJTY NATOtt& TITLE C"ndNT FM TIRE a9WMM. CO rMff NGM8D1 05-00Y310n0 PARK PLACE OFFICE SITE SITEWORK CONSTRUCTION PLANS SECTIONS 17, TOWNSHIP 29 S, RANGE 16 E PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA LVA -.HEEV LV mEAr D l C1 f I � ll Pr.ae T'w'wr "1.'. LL+dx+xYmt .! �rC 7• D�y( 0. ](g L-19q Z^eo �� _j A.,• � fN 1"- 6-1 f7 L A/ d » �-- �I�1 3.rp,eros WARNING -ACTOR TO GALL 'SUNS STATE ONE CALL' I -60a- 432 -4)7o 46 HoLas P M TO MY OEAWNG M CONSTaucnaN FOR EOSTWC OMITY LocARONS PREPARED FOR: HALLMARK DEVELOPMENT OF FLORIDA, INC 4500 140th AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 101 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33762 PHONE-. (727) 539-7002 FAX-. (727) 536 -3574 PREPARED BY SHEET TITLE 1 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. 2 Land Development Consulting 13825 ICOT BLVD., SUITE 605 / Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727) 524 -1818 & LIGHTING PLAN Fax: (727) 524 -6090 SHEET TITLE 1 COVER SHEET 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS /DEMOLITION PLAN 3 HORIZONTAL CONTROL, STRIPING, SIGNAGE Ee16116g Land U.: IL (Industri9l Limitcd) & LIGHTING PLAN 4 SITE PLAN 5 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS 6 PAVING, GRADING AND DRANAGE DETAILS 7 WATER AND SANITARY SEWER DETAILS 8 WATER AND SANITARY SEWER DETAILS LAND USE SUMIMARY E2ieting Zoalag: IRT (Industrial, Rcw=h and Technology) Site Area: 7.39 Acres (322,082 sf) Ee16116g Land U.: IL (Industri9l Limitcd) F.A.R: Proposed 0.18 Maximum 0.65 Parking: Rcquira) O�cc: J /1000 sf = 172 spaces (7 Handicaprped) (Based W 57,484 sr office) Fl.poscd 237 spaces (7 Handicapp d) Vehkular U. Area (VUA): 93,706 d Interior Parknt Landmaim Area: 15,903,17 (16.9%) Imp-1— Sorlace RROn (ISR): Proposed: 0.47 Required: 0.85 mac. Building Height. 50 fcct max. Bailding B—Iol rn: - Building A: 12,5004 I -Story Building B: 9,966 sf 2 -Story Bailding C: 9,728< 2•Story Building D: 25.2904 1 -Story I. 57,484 M— Recruited Proposed to Parking Setbacks: Front: North 20 f. 58.6 fcet Front: Cast 20 fat 39.4 fed Front: Wcst 20 fat 122.7 fat Side: South 15 f t 15 fat " PER THE DRI MAXIMUM OFFICE. SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED IS 63,300 SF 38-009 REVISED 7/23/07 DATB 3/24/08 N 00 3 M/a ,os , -- ---- - =�r'8 �+ FI _ _ _ b � _ t - -g =------------------- d _ l .DOH —p — — - — — 7. a ^ f dA'' i_a4 b �f.J•L • LOLL -3V A.. y: tt � _ L - - � �;. �.(.. ...111 ••• i /��1�'�'�_' �((��fy b "s •: YO `-Z "3Q, e3 tcm '•a b Al III ,s j� u'I a � � L '�r''�° ''•� � f I I -�,1�' !eJ. i 1� b y g � �� a =� Ili! L F �' o1i\ : � f A� zi�� so, a " ❑ e I��. + a � ' �;� ♦ � � � p � � �s � ;gin g' �' � w IIII r � a / �`\� � L � � �'� ��IS o�=. $ � j. L n .32+. •.n � S III i t9 " AV „ E iii jI � �• �wPd L1" c R ��"1 • � 7 M�z - ���'— y— . —.�. —y 1 � ' ��1 �+' � : .y a '• y aw I wt n I ' b tin•, a ` rO! Z:- ' : !ae .. L `� ak,3� s €' Ing o y a s� e1 A`'- 7 ' �•.d S .:r `?': x� 4.1.E S SL l ? ©V 4.... F 'SSSSS€ 5... 6p ! syy,, xi 'Y`rL� S }�-� x'[ Y 3` S S✓ r� e p la i S L `.. P 't. •i,...,` a ei �j{�1° Y,d .. " �y'v". y�8e li S III SS e e S € S "s.7r S x' x e ,q s: N III _ k ._ //✓ %f� S ` yk�r�y3S S Sr_°+ tl ! tCO���� LS [{ Il�iii L� I I ...SS S BLS III •�. f' ,S k ,v c a xYx S .( `° s r d _ " x •x.3§ �Q)e1I to co VIII IR ` !) # • ifs �` L (`'� b S 4 Z alll <e v *y SJt, E !a sa a "L € w O VIII I —a a >< , S.,S L S S �`� �' • • �° 0 Ili d S Sb'`,ry S ♦b Tj's<i i`#,+5•r in i •xn �' ^x xw m S S `- F ;C S y {! i ba x ,: i1 x. S^ ..>! ♦� . J °. w bill ari la I _ t : ? ° ao la SL ( e I arv%,. S 10 I R P% L i W I la {�I - tl k 4 l a (. ' f ypa p� ;1,1'! S A i- /"� B o w O e a L— gy 9 iii4S` ,vaS �-vc •' y S L i x �AT I x a 'S r, S x�: 1t w;, r` L b'3 : °,�xar 4 [¢ I E�'-`> Its O x llb altl — fn zg� y S?. yrk'*x xi 4L. _ 9 4 aL � � I � bxaCifF t S w 3 la °w IIIIILSO dL 4 'xkt..'� S4 S• �S -�4', S.,y:x�L• S U w I R III � . � 0 II - I - ^Px I x _ �5I x � 4 �y F `' � y;q1 'i.^t 4,'TY � •. ✓t ° �: III -/< a °{ .,,3�'t�, rS 4 L '� ` x- a3c_1 L-�L�: S31• F °_ III: S ' L — �/ x'Lg s S x.' x S f. Lx �3:ii Srr S S S� SI a• i I la ', S° w I# ml a p Spl)jk9 �^I6hl �txx'�' „�'` S of r 3�.; 9 all a I-- Er V•, && ii,�li t. b k�`�✓ �lr! �4 CE LII a II ( E r t IE k,'6+ ! • ! L L f�L f3 t7 roS YE,riSd?4rs Ex:4 k 1 .a 04. S IL St .�. . '. S — S b S �S S%:y -�„ Y.- s,{..�x•Y x `r, - ,;r, S.. So �nc xwL S xa� eS `r..34 w 'C exv &.S 0 x i; ' S 5.,x<t)� S ti,..t 4 S o m io I L.. 1 x F x xy `a'; rN co �� I as a �`� S"���'a'`�r�i �`L� � :%��•'�:� a � - �o =M I bl b \ \\ �•4 � r��> ii , xy pr °� S �,yl� � �] o U N i -�,,. �•' / S ! bnSeir"iSb .e..r; 3i '°A ^ � r � i n a al ;�\ �1 '`$ e : � 4p,- sE "I !tip, i � €•;�• *�'x �?• �a�� t��+�lre�; � � � � `o cs. // its LLI x�, lil I x �• "�• � RE e tl IIp� �i �:���a � to �. 3 jL............... ............................... .. ... .. .. eaA W ws axr—• .s -------- :- -------- ': a --- - - ........ -. - _- - - _ - - - - ° -_ -- " i gT � �Gc a_ m c Psi:a � �� .�,cn.._...a `� 804 - __ _•�_ _- _;$_1ws_ I�� �� : --------- - - - - -- €' -� d- �-`d -A 3 l f1s�0 8 3 � V�d_� =�; • -- — —" —_'� _.+.I � 1- LAJ W Q llJ W. 0- UKIVI vry RECEIVED LNG DRARTMENT C1N ©F, CLEARWATER D R E W S T R E E T (C.R. 108) 100' R/W v I N89'56'11„W W n E "z 6.., \ — - -- — — -- — — — — — — — — 805.05 P 815.22'(L) x° - - -- --- - -- -- - --- -- - - -- Lr -- __ - - -- - _ -- -- - - -- - -- - -.z. -_ -- - -- -- — - - - - - -1 / 6 .... ;I -- __ - - -- 1 -- ___ - - -- - -_ \ I QII II _ OPEN III H. axxx(,w) - - SPACE - - EAISIIYC RC IEI1 t C ^J . \.LH I ''I gA --- I I I I >li iG j I'.I I ml z' EsISTINC RETFNT1QN ',REA l� r / -m °r 'En 'I w "x :� "xn �aJ (]w)�� k - I�I I�O�iiii II In � d� °3'✓ /� e'��h I- i / x. "` III r�+ IPIi i A l/ ", °max. x °c P) s,.a SPACE U -1 ( :. - -pry / /l\ it II I �' x/r��� <" ° % + ®� " °) II 1111 Idl -•'�1P ! • -' ;. DREE„aA< EIEx�x° a.P) N. - STOP II f ij v au,0WS.F. 6.0m S.F. Ia i 17 / /"s x r 25,290 S.F. f -1,o lT.,� r_ _ w. I.. , I o Ix" i axPDA) sa".x 1 -Story Ilzll I�( ° - - ii I h III I n.r ("'°) If g O fr'?l - ALI —� 1 I I m it STOP 12,500 S.F. 1 -Story µsmx aEx ' I I l a;I II I I s o: P-, = l ' s.oP .n axx mP) s.7ze sFn ,, T P saea I p Id - i I W ib.e' " - - - -- - - - 11 EN II I I r LsPACE1 i oPq © -- - -� �.� xA•`i II ?n l r 3 ill ¢ «, ji Px ,) - 6i� —_ E- 1. e / !m)—.1 I N xxo og0 x' sax, . "¢als / °. - — — a OPEN ego is -.P o ¢ E 11L - °I , I — 5 0 ax $ F', SPACE O 11 _ a Aaurz t t x o !rn \-- ►--- T. I Z IF?T IN �I R• - - - - TM.w r _ -- - -- - - - - - - - - -n - e1s —az' , tea" f —Sas 1 �Dl S89 53'14 W - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- xx "Oro) - -- y 3 - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- „",x" -------------- - i r 1 III a• a E—E, xF a TI BE SCACEIE1 11 9 Ga "� „ TMxiai "�Ax °s i l Iii oPEx,x 1 .... Nx °h. \� - - 1 1 Pw \ II ,E 5 L— 1 — ).,,..,F.,, xax, EE--E- a a:. EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN x °x� /`ph - #21 Park Place Blvd. _ ®E %ISTING INTERIOR LPNDSCAPEO AREAS 7S J\ S9lL PROPOSED INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREAS I xAl "IU., 131_ARI.Y(: i:l K)I ?US` ,S® 2 GECflAGE LIGHTING WH1ON WILL BE BY SCREENED DnNPSTHE \ ..__ ._.- :..- .__..- ...._.._c ..U1 ._...._ .:.......... . }..... ......... <1.��... R. ALL LIDHTIND WILL BE oRIENIED NWECOLY TOWARD THE MIDDLE OF THE SITE. FN . NEL EFFlCIENT VEHICLE NGI'f ii.)` \ SCALE: I• -30' �. ILL PECKING SPACES ECE WI]H RUE PL CEDPS. \ .ALL NECHANICIL EDUIPNEIR MLL BE RACED ON THE ROOFTOPS FInFA_ cult coast Consulting, Inc. Hallmark Development of Florida ,Ina f� "- I- l -T4nV" ��^^� -n,767 _ Iv,A TJacI °win co.xwuxs 4500140th Avenue N., Suite 101 PARK PLACE OFFICE SITE ' 3 CleanvateE, Florida 33762 HORIZONTAL CONTROL, STRIPING, ]mi°] t4 a an :: Phone: (727) 539 -7002 Far: (727)536 -3574 SIGNAGE & LIGHTING PLAN (EXHIBa4) n.ro" I.— z LLJ C= C'I 7- . . .. . . ........ IM/8 '09 H 00 G ,V� --H -0 8 - N 0 d V4 V - — - - — - — - — -------------- ----- ---- - ----- — ------ -- ----- I Th R . . . ... .... .... . . . .. -bg �0 4 i 4 ;t W5 Z A ai- qo� 4 I vim �F, bb t VE- 19 1/0 OR IN oo -C4 It' -30 Uj U 6 77 2- Lri IN C) 00 N Ld Ch > .�d C%4 n 0 F2 C!2 E IN F- LO III < u 0111 (3 C, j2d 00111 10 &0 IN Mb M cv) a- e z F, uj zr. I 0i J) LLJ ir o All V) 0 Of. z h 01% LLJ V �10 L--T 7' F-- ----7 A.3 MN 01) 0 z cy 41 1, 11 � 1 4) L- 4 2 Ln I —t L.L: -6 00 N oi 0 da A rog., iu� R ij21 5 Q 1 91 9 9W q H VR & ---- -- ----------- 7— ........................ .... . .... ip R .... ...... .. 82, 5 - --------- to o-w ------ ----- ---- --- Al—f m e 3 0 1 61i LLJ tn 00 Big fi a € € g� M1 -a ! illy 4 i' f i °gaF -Q %4��s6e EE 2 O W�wn d a gp €M 8�5?z ,§3t W b ory,sr w :anon O Q W qj QC7 z a Ca ° t im �-:F €STS an Q�aaQ� � o0 vae.a Ex ]. o a "• r lid zs L La 2( rc .2 1 .Y /E 12 S lC < x 7 a r F x N ' its 912-- a H W Q e W e! 777 w FIR O Q 1z v all 9 'os3 e z c> • e� ° m ° I I -° o I � - � � �• \ 3 P�'sat t i e a I.�➢ m 9°I9 L?4 HUMP o U r - Y h � � o ems" 4 F 17; 16 �J �_ - 0 3�eW�se s�W>.Y ti Q�s3 L�e/s ® _ ; m _- b�. �.-pp ip u W� °.e9344�... �>A V..QQSF EYE ........... oii u _ BGG`�-R ?ja7 'vim y iv�ca�.i ,z p- LU C'I m c, LU 1-1 001 I 1 0 r. L -Y G iILLJ MH LLJ < u k 31 r �o- L x LLJ lu a gg.4gN E u o o u u U, 1-1-1-1k klk L W cn 99 6 c 5 Z LIM A T I I RA g k EU `62 U Zn w 9-A c > Id, A F— > LLJ J 3 T V) Li af LLJ > g2 T- NO- LLJ vw N. 0 fu ul 12: 51 —F I La Ni ... Rs o I l7q Qo) L 8D >- U> ol m A to Se. L WN 2s U, 10 -s p-� z ul '-Z tz v F u u 7 u 0 tx uj 00 00 e g: , S' a 0 0 �y �z 94 A w �a m o vuo oio ¢jNp qVm= ° m o rcm ° U K H S¢ N °o j w. „ r ° m° a° w° m° ®�p �o �' °u - a «�W m°m_m mom q - >0 8P alai xW�g >W_ - >as� snt- �' °o �o�owoo° «. 6i� •�9�E N - A =og o i i y"° wo n z 3l9tlIMtlA f C a q N _ N2 mw> Z T7 :n Q i — z F" nuu � J � € m�, w a s � o a 3 U En IZ OS i Z 9 A i n fl z. tE - Q our - —_ •I a z � � a o — ; N du Z J 3 C r� ? C Z� >. Aso =� z® W o�€ e -F PA 77 -7. ilk r d3lVM? V310 3®A11O iN31 Y18,44,30 9NINNVId LOU cI Cl03b WN19180 7, ^1 777 A., I Nil pp Nor, sk A., I Nil ORIGINAL REED ,'. ) "Y 0? 2001 PLANNING DEtPPRTMEN9 CITY OF CLEARWATER 1; rn l� N 0 V i0 0 a ao a c�a � E Ior Z 4} ci 4 ti ems 0 sv 0 v c Z ` £ -Fwc ACCESS LAND USE EXISTING PLANNED TOTAL RETAIL/ COMMERICAL 81,120 SF 0 81,120 SF OFFICE 304,639 SF1 100,000 SF 404,639 SF LT. INDUSTRIAL 100,000 SF 100,000 SF 200,000 SF MULTI- FAMILY 2. THAT PoR60N OF THE OEMkL.OPMp17 THAT RExAm TD BE DEVELOPED R REFELIRM TO AS THE'PLAMED OEVEIDPMENT'. THE BUHD -MJT DALE FOR THE PLANNED RESIOENTIAL 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU TOTAL 485.759 SF 200.000 SF 685,759 SF 390 DU 0 DU 390 DU B. 3. 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT O10 3f OF 2.40 M�Ii�I- FAMLLY UKM WIN A NAIUMLIM OF 240 UWTS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE OEVCIOPMENT 1D 2.44 HMM ROOMS WM A 11AWUM OF 244 UNITS ARE HERESY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL B AS APPROVED BY OROwANOE 6078 -CR. GULF- TO-BAY &OTIL£VARD -,__/ COMMERCIAL 25 842 SF MOO (am & 1=1w o PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Gulf Coast Consultants, Inc. Land Development Consulting MAP H DATE: FIGURE: REM SED: AUGUST 22, 2003 DRAWN BY_ RAW v N a p w 0 04 0 f? Hams. 1. 11E PROPOSED AMOLN7 OF SWME FOOTAOE FOR INCIVIDCTAL UNDEVELOPED A'ARCZLS ARE BA !{D ON IM AYNLABLE MARHET EvDf61A7mN AND ME SUBA= TO CHANOE FUTURE THE AMOLKT OF TOTAL OEWLOPYENT. HDWEVFTi LMIL MIST EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF DEYMAP"T APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER ACCESS 2. THAT PoR60N OF THE OEMkL.OPMp17 THAT RExAm TD BE DEVELOPED R REFELIRM TO AS THE'PLAMED OEVEIDPMENT'. THE BUHD -MJT DALE FOR THE PLANNED DEVFLOPOFSTT AND FOR THE TOM PRIME7.'T IS DECEMBER al, MOIL 3. ATES OF 1X00 SQUARE FM OF MIGHT INMS'IRIN_ DEV OPRENT To E31 O OFFICE DEWIDI' FTIT ARE MEBY ESTAHJ9iED ON PARCEL T AS fAUFL OFIOMMCE 05722 -05 RE9DEMIULL DEVELOPMENT 1VEL BE UWTED TO PARCELS 2. 3. 8 AND B. 3. 1,000 SF OF OFFICE DEVELOPMENT O10 3f OF 2.40 M�Ii�I- FAMLLY UKM WIN A NAIUMLIM OF 240 UWTS, OR 1,000 SF OF OFFICE OEVCIOPMENT 1D 2.44 HMM ROOMS WM A 11AWUM OF 244 UNITS ARE HERESY ESTABLISHED FOR PARCEL B AS APPROVED BY OROwANOE 6078 -CR. GULF- TO-BAY &OTIL£VARD -,__/ COMMERCIAL 25 842 SF MOO (am & 1=1w o PARK PLACE DRI - MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Gulf Coast Consultants, Inc. Land Development Consulting MAP H DATE: FIGURE: REM SED: AUGUST 22, 2003 DRAWN BY_ RAW v N a p w 0 04 0 ok v]__ A PART OF LOT 1, STORZ OPTHALMICS, INC. PARK PLACE, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 109, PAGE 10 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE S.00'19'21 "E., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 380.43 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE, S.89'53 "IeW., 96.87 FEET, THENCE S.44053'14 "W, 15.25 FEET; THENCE S.89'53'14 "W:, 75.00 FEET; THENCE N.44'32'11 "W., 15.10 FEET; THENCE S.89 °5314 "W., 619.02 FEET; THENCE S.56'20'58 "W., 28.44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, ALSO BEING A NON- TALGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 610.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 142.72 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13024'18" (CHORD BEARING N.03'12'35 "W. 142.39 FEET) TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 690.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID WEST LINE THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES: 1) NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 41.30 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03 °25'46" (CHORD BEARING N.01'46'42 "E.,41.29 FEET); 2) THENCE N.00'03'49 "E., 190.21 FEET; 3) THENCE N.45'03'49 "E., 35.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE S.89'56'11 "E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 815.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 7.394 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. ND-UL THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHOWN ABOVE LIES WHOLLY WITHIN THE DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN IN FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE, COMMITMENT NUMBER 05- 005 - 310330. CONTRACTOR TO CALL "SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL" 1 -800- 432 -4770 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY CLEARING OR CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS MIMI 6 HALLM"ARK OLDNIEV ELOPMENT OF FLORDA, INd LAND USE SUMMARY %,tAa c IT 6' C DRC DATE - a CDO DATE em c 50 feet max. SIGNATURE DATE i 1JRAWING INDEX 12,500 sf SHEET TITLE. 1 COVER SHEET 2 -Story 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS/DEMOLITION PLAN 3 HORIZONTAL CONTROL, STRIPING, SIGNAGE LIGHTING PLAN 25,290 sf 4 SITE PLAN 5 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS 6 PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS 7 WATER AND ` SANITARY SEWER DETAILS 8 WATER AND SANITARY SEWER DETAILS LAND USE SUMMARY %,tAa c IT 6' C DRC DATE - a CDO DATE em c 50 feet max. SIGNATURE DATE i ** PER THE DRI MAXIMUM OFFICE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED IS 63,300 SF Building A: 12,500 sf 1 -Story Building : 9,966 sf 2 -Story Building C: 9,728 sf 2- Story Building : 25,290 sf 1 -Story Total: 57,484 sf** Required Proposed to Parking setbacks: Front: North 20 feet 58.6 feet Front: East 20 feet 39.4 feet Front: West 20 feet 122.7 feet Side: South 15 feet 15 feet ** PER THE DRI MAXIMUM OFFICE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED IS 63,300 SF a N N O 0 w O ` a a LL m m 0 0 o fN Q m� a R U a� �o w� z� .. v > D D CURB INLET 13 o TOP OF RIM =38.84 ff ffU IL CHECK If n, F.B. & M. r III z t IRL (C. o 1' 1009 R/W 108) DEC 1 iUr FRUiV i =• -ri.UU 39'99 I I TOP BACK ELEV. =42.42 10' o gP�K { I I WEIR ELEV. =41.31 I I I m f i NEO PIPE ENV.337.42 38.56 10" 0� X` /,��, �Y Tp FES Il�� 16' OAK © X .02 `S INV. =37.47 �i� x -i x ao.26 Ili l 14° OAK ( — IS 40.88 12° oaK { 1 I I I I _ \82 _ { I I f DESIGNED RDH DRAWN RP Q.C. Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting LEGEND X44.,64 DMSTING ELEVATION DMSTING BOUNDARY EX TREE TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED OR DEMOLISHED TREE LEGEND = o DO BL z CHECK m F.B. & M. VALVE U THESE PLANS MAY NOT BE COPIED OR MODIFIED WMOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM GULF COAST CONSULTING. 1NC. D. HARM P.E. F 3 rr i 1 1 •�► 1,. 13OLLAHDS /44.03 � x44.15 >44.45 NO. I DATE 1 j E- m w � o U � Z O 'U / FES / WV.= 38.04 p DRAINAGE POND EXISTING INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREAS I'o II � 1- I� I PROPOSED INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREAS I OUTFACE CONTROL STRUCTURE TOP OF STRUCTURE(BACK)=43.39 TOP OF STRUCTURE(FRONT)=43.16 WEIR ELEV. =42.66 SLOT ELEV. =40.41 REVISIONS I I I I I I I I I �r n 06-009'41 F.B. & M. 407orc nATB: AFP'D 3/24/06 BY OF 06-009'41 F.B. & M. SHT. nATB: AFP'D 3/24/06 BY OF .1 0 n in 10 9 rn 9 zc i O - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - z aunts - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - % _ - / - - - " - - _- _ - _ - - %- - - - - - - - - - - - - /V r/AmMIU Ir10AUM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PLS#3612 /15 C S - - - - - - - - - - - -- - =_ ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - r r I I EXIST TOP OF BANK TOB UTILITY EASE. () P* �-� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r-XfST=p 7MN(K - - - - - - --------- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - suo?z - es - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ..® ® ®- _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ST aj C_ LO EXIST TOE OF SLOPE H CONCRETE BLOCK OPEN 14!-8"x14!-8" DUMPSTER 6" VERTICAL ENCLOSURE & CONCRETE PAD SPACE EXISTING RETENTION AREA I CURB (TYP) EXIST 6" 9. (TYP) �XIST Top EXIST EP /-CURB (TYP) OF. BANK EM-T EP EX 6 ® BANK (TYP) N". O� �<97m: .1 __ 20' PARKING z 8 SETBACK -0 TIP �O_N DI NA RKINI 1 LAN�( 91 f TYP)�__j EXISTING RETENTION AREA FIRE TRUCK RO - E (STING 6 TICAL TYP - ----- ADEij-T�0NAL 7 3 P FT,4 ELT-PrA- FUK I N G _____EXTST9TG__ - - t ASPHALT PARKING c*4 (n O _j • PARKING ISLAND C"I A PARKIN (TYP) tK 7 9' (TYP) EXISTING CIV SIDE AL J (TY 40 IV: VIQ E T 6 LOADING Z -01 LOADING ZONE CURB (T'�W FEV FEV )NE M OLJI N + 6y XIST 6" URB (TYP) 13.8, R4 3 10' OPLITY EASEMENT 74.6' DIRECTIONAL PG 10 OPEN 0 6* HIGH SPAC DIRECTIONAL LIGHTING (TYP) 61.3' E g- MI _-P MASONRY WALL 15' 0 LIGHTING (TYP) 109' 20" IPARK1N 4,7 PROPOSED�1' PARKING UB 30' CD 30' 0 0) 1 .1 1 - 1 % \ I SPACE 9' ADDED 3.3 PARKISPACNG DIRECTIONAL LIG HTING (TYP) STOP E,' K9 (TI �U5 R1 1 EXIST-6;"' -Stor /-CURB (TYP) 2 PLAYGROUND 44ill 1011, 74.6' 5,000 S.F. U5 EXIT C\1 ADD ONAL 134' 0i (12) CUR (TYP) -r �--f Tk Al� ING ISLAND 144! 91 ig, 25,290 S.F. (TYP TRANSFORMER PADS (TYP) 10 1 BIKE RACK 24' 4 DIRECTIONAL LIGHTING (TYP) 13 SPACES .4 1 -Story 177.7' 3/W 74,6' 39.4! C6 TYP) LIJ oo 0 A z 6" RTICAL 00 Cu B 122.7' =3 N Iwo- 2,500 S. F. 1 -Story 0 TRANSFORMER PADS (TYP) C9 - 0 If 0 P - 15 WIDE SIDEWAL< 6 II Q 24.9' j I STOP PHALT 755 6- VERTICAL CURB (TYP) 30' 0 9,728 S.F. Ca<L 0 - " - - EXIST (R1 -1 _j I- DIRECTIONAL LIGHTING (TYP) < STOP 2-Story m CURB TP = z < TRANSFORMER PADS (TYP)_ io TyP)_'U 0- 0i 0 F__ R1-1 -5' SIDEWALK 205.5' �fa 181.3' 20' 1 144! 74.6' U�� . . . . . . . . . Uj Q3 24.9 OPEN g*TyP) 9, 3_2 2 FEV FEY F FEV EXIST _�6 A FEV FEV FEV FEV FEV CURB (TYP) TZ FEV PROPOSED TOS FE EV @ 6V TOS D 5' 9' (TYP) Cq I I • 1120' SIG j PROPOSE PROPOSED HT TRVINGLES TOB 1 1 A (Typl 11 Im LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING Ll 15.25 S44°53'1 4"W L2 75.00 S89'53'1 4"W L3 15.10 N44!32'11 "W L4 28.44 S56*20'58"W L5 35.36 S45'03'49"W 4 rBOLLARD 0� CURB W/CRASH GATIE 4 4 4 M EXISTING S MOUNTABLE CONCRETE 6L HIGH CONCRETE IBLOCK ATPROPERTYLINE D MPSTIER ENCLOS RE(DOUBLE) M 0 & CONCRETE PAD EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN M F z = r- 0 I+EX 701 PAGE 2 (SEE SHEET 6) ;0 #21 Park Place Blvd. U) > EXISTING INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREAS `% I; Ili, 'N T I / W I;, W.. 0. 1 DRAWN MKC CHECKED RP Q.C. CURVE TABLE NOTES: 1® GARBAGE COLLECTION WILL BE BY SCREENED DUMPSTER. 2. ALL UGHTING WILL BE ORIENTED INWARDLY TOWARD THE MIDDLE OF THE SITE. PROPOSED INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREAS FEV = FUEL EFFICIENT VEHICLE cc < CURVE LENGTH RADIUS BEARING CHORD C1 142.72 610.00 SOT 12'34 "E 142.39 C2 41.30 690.00 N01'46'42"E 41.29 W.. 0. 1 DRAWN MKC CHECKED RP Q.C. Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 Clearwater, Florida 33762 Phone: (727) 539-7002 Fax: (727)536-3574 HORIZONTAL CONTROL, STRIPING, SIGNAGE &LIGHTING PLAN (E=BT : WN, DATE REMIONS D TF_ A31241•• Gulf Coast Consulting , hie. PREPARED FOR: Hallmark Development of Florida, SHEET DESCRIPTION: Inc. • • SCREENM GENERATOR -MME PLANS MAY NOT RE COPIM OR UODSED VA7HWT VRTMN PSUMM GNERATR lff • SCREEN ED E • FROM GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC "M Land Development Consulting ADDED LEEDS •INFoRmnm i CtTY-OF CLEARWA1UCREV1Sf0_N_S_____ 4500 140th Avenue N., Suite 10 1 !I PARK PLACE OFFICE SITE Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 Clearwater, Florida 33762 Phone: (727) 539-7002 Fax: (727)536-3574 HORIZONTAL CONTROL, STRIPING, SIGNAGE &LIGHTING PLAN (E=BT : WN, DATE REMIONS D TF_ A31241•• - IWO 110 Wq 111011111=10711 9111"Iff"14-9100-11 ON lalm I DFSIGNM RDH Gulf Coast Consulting, hic. PREPARED FOR: Halhnark Development of Florida Inc. SHEET DESCPUPTION: I PiESE PLANS MAY NOT BE COPIED OR MODIFIED VAT�IOUT VRTnN PERMISSION FROM GULF COAST CONSULTIN% INC. Land Development Consulting 4500 140th Avenue N.,, Suite 10 1 PARK PLftCE OFFICE SITE 13825 ICOT BLVD., SME 605 Clearwater, Florida 33760 Clearwater, Florida 33762 ROWW D. HMM PS. WM :Qzf!7A13 Aft Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 Phone: (727) 539-7002 Fax: (727)536 SITE PLAN NOT VAUD UNMS Sam & amm ikAIR 18, Trench 18, Varies Undisturbed Trench Side Compacted T=6 untit W exceeds ��, then . Qffi/W,W\~`` T=8" RDH DRAVkN RP Q.0 / HANDICAPPED SIGN INDEX NO. no CONC. WALK RAMP DOWN CONC. WALK SEE INDEX NO. 109 WHITE STRIPE NOTE: All pavement markings to be thermoplastic. . t- i WHITE BORDER 17V & SYMBOL BLUE BACKGROUND ADDED HANDICAP PARKING DETAIL PARKING BY BLACK BORDER DISABLED WHITE BACKGROUND ONLY BLACK BORDER 8c �E�TE�S � $!255 S. WHITE BACKGROUND 0 3l�.18 ALL LETTERS | � | � Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. F_,and Development Consulting � ` k0 STANDARD PRE-PAINTED DISABLED PARKING 3|CN ON 1/8- THICK SHEET ALUMINUM sn CL 2. HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL PIPE a ~ � u 8^X2-O CONCRETE MASS. FINISH TOP OF MASS LB/EL WITH A SLIGHT RAISED WASH � ' 2" ABOVE � 1/ LEVEL OF TURF/SOD. HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL Straight Curb Q) Q) SLope 1/4' per Foot Asphal.tic concrete Base c PL_�ourse (6' Crushed concrete LBR 150) (8" Compacted to 987 AASBTO T-180) NOTES: 1. Pavement nuter|u(s and thickness, and base muter|uis and thickness nK[ be stated in construction drawings and scope of the work. 2. See construction drawings for curb type and tune widths. SIDEWALK IS CONTINUOUS ACROSS DRIVE (TYP) Construction Joint Permitted (T :�K I , . B / .� I?° A L" NY MIA � � �� �o Vinqs only if A / Back of Curb won7slIP surfcce require- Remove Curb if Existing 12" Exist Conc Drive Max Slope 12" Max Slope TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION -� ��� Remove Back mf Curb on State or ,Vertical Curbs with n vertical Sow cut or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Romp. I- Modified and Valley Gutter Curbs join exist bock of curb 12- Max Slope Textured Surface � \ Ren`ove to on SECTION A—A NOTES: l. Provide tooled joints at distances matching the width. Also place expansion joints at driveways. 2. R some physical obstruction exists which prevents the placing o, sidewalks oo shown, contact the Engineering Division for alternate location. 3. Wooden and other spacers will not he permitted in sidewalks or dhveauyn. 4. No coatings of any kind will be permitted on concrete sidewalks or dhvonqya without *pooifin approval of the Qty Engineer. 5. All concrete umoU be 3000 psi min. 02Odays, with fiber mash reinforcing. V. Concrete surface to he light broom finish. 7' Concrete driveway construction ahoo be O~ thick w 6x0/10x10 vo|dvd wire mesh reinforcement. � = / Lo � 111111 M Back of Curb , , Min Residential Street 5' Min Arterial --Street 2' County-R-Al 1/4" per Foot 3000 psi conc 4^ thick. Cnnntr. G" thick at driveways with 6x6 #10 welded wire rnoah. See note 7. ����T|ON �—A SECTION .�^. . � �� 8. Romps ohoU have o tactile surface, textured to o depth not exceeding /8" by use of tamp or roller in conformance with requirements of Funl Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, uotoo 304 or most recent modifications. =�« ���- u SECTION / /O/v TYPE/ / L_ L- �� Recommended Maximum Pipe Size: ,3/-[)« kyO//-24« Pipe 4/_6« W\J//-36« Pipe / -5/-'4« | - ,o DRAINAGE | MUST BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND THE WEIGHT OF A 80,000 LB EMERGENCY VEHICLE. Jot tc ADDED HANDICAP PARKING DETAIL MOMM 0. HAMS PX_ J 36M BY A REGISTERED ENMNEEFt GULF COAST CONSULTING. INC� CEItTlIFICAIE OF AUTHDRIZAIION No. 9774 Jot tc UJ OF n a- DRAWN MC CHECKED RP 1.) WAILS a.) New construction: maximum 6' -0' high and constructed of concrete block (8 "x8 "x16 "). Materials used should be consistent with those used in the construction of and architectural style of the principal building. (Section 3 -802 Materials) b.) Existing: maximum 6' -0' high replacement materials can be made of the some materials as long as they are made of approved opaque material. 2.) FOOTINGS 8 "x16" concrete w /2— #5 continuous rebar imbedded. 3.) CONCRETE SLAB Monolithic, min. 6" thickness w /imbedded 6 "x6 "/ 10x10 welded wire fabric (W.W.F.), 3000 P.S.I. with fiber mesh reinforcing. 4.) CONCRETE FILLED CELLS With 1 —#5 vertical rebar tied to footer steel at each comer and every 4' O.C. 5.) GATES Constructed of min. 1 -1/2' diameter galvanized tubular steel w /privacy —type slats inserted in galvanized steel mesh fabric, hinge — mounted on min. 3" diameter galvanized steel post. (Gates and post constructed and installed per applicable building code by licensed fence contractor). 6.) DROP PIN 1/2' dia. 18' long metal rod gate latch. Provide 3/4" dia. hole 6" into concrete for rods. In asphalt provide a 3/4" P.V.C. sleeve, 6" long, or equal. 7.) SOIL Soil bearing capacity to be at least 2,500 P.S.F. CONCRETE MASONRY WAIL CONSTRUCTION Materials, construction and quantity control of masonry shall be in accordance with Uniform Building Code (UBC), Chapter 24. General conditions and construction requirements shall be applied as specified in UBC, Section 2404 (f), during grouted masonry work. 1. All reinforcing steel shall be deformed bars conforming to ASTM A -615, Grade 60. Vertical reinforcement shall be placed in the center of the masonry cell, and shall be held in position at the top and bottom. 2. If a slab dowel does not line —up with a vertical core, it shall not be sloped more than one horizontal in six verticals (1:6). 3. Horizontal wall reinforcement shall be standard truss type DUR —O —WAIL (or equivalent) at 16' o.c.. 4. Hollow Load— bearing Concrete Masonry Units shall be normal weight conforming to ASTM C -90, with a minimum compressive strength of 1,900 PSI. 5. Mortar shall be type M or S, in accordance with ASTM C -270. Place all masonry in running bond with 3/8" mortar joints. Provide complete coverage face shell mortar bedding, horizontal and vertical. 6. Coarse grout shall conform to ASTM C -476, with a maximum aggregate size of 3/8 ", 8" to 10' slump, and a minimum compressive strength of 2,500 PSI at 28 days. 7. Minimum 3" X 3" clean —out holes (saw —cut) are required at the bottom course of all cells to verify grout placement. Clean —outs shall be sealed after masonry inspection — provided in accordance with ACI 531 -4.6, and before grouting. 8. Prior to grouting, the grout space shall be clean, with no mortar projections greater the %", mortar droppings or other foreign material. All cells shall be in vertical alignment, and shall solidly be filled with coarse grout as specified. 9. During placing, grout shall be consolidated with flexible cable vibrator. First grout pour shall be stopped a minimum of 1 - 1/2' below the top of the middle bond beam masonry. 4' MINIMUM OR 1 I + M O FULL RAMP WIDTH 0000000o0000000000000000 I a o0o000000000000000000 000000 0000000 00 0000000000000 000000 000000000000000000000000 Ca 000000 000000 0000000o t--4 000000 000000000000000000000000 0- 0a000 } 000000 000000000000000000000000 E— 000000 000000 000000 000000000000000000000000 00a000 Cll 00000 0 > - 00000 000000 n a- DRAWN MC CHECKED RP 1.) WAILS a.) New construction: maximum 6' -0' high and constructed of concrete block (8 "x8 "x16 "). Materials used should be consistent with those used in the construction of and architectural style of the principal building. (Section 3 -802 Materials) b.) Existing: maximum 6' -0' high replacement materials can be made of the some materials as long as they are made of approved opaque material. 2.) FOOTINGS 8 "x16" concrete w /2— #5 continuous rebar imbedded. 3.) CONCRETE SLAB Monolithic, min. 6" thickness w /imbedded 6 "x6 "/ 10x10 welded wire fabric (W.W.F.), 3000 P.S.I. with fiber mesh reinforcing. 4.) CONCRETE FILLED CELLS With 1 —#5 vertical rebar tied to footer steel at each comer and every 4' O.C. 5.) GATES Constructed of min. 1 -1/2' diameter galvanized tubular steel w /privacy —type slats inserted in galvanized steel mesh fabric, hinge — mounted on min. 3" diameter galvanized steel post. (Gates and post constructed and installed per applicable building code by licensed fence contractor). 6.) DROP PIN 1/2' dia. 18' long metal rod gate latch. Provide 3/4" dia. hole 6" into concrete for rods. In asphalt provide a 3/4" P.V.C. sleeve, 6" long, or equal. 7.) SOIL Soil bearing capacity to be at least 2,500 P.S.F. CONCRETE MASONRY WAIL CONSTRUCTION Materials, construction and quantity control of masonry shall be in accordance with Uniform Building Code (UBC), Chapter 24. General conditions and construction requirements shall be applied as specified in UBC, Section 2404 (f), during grouted masonry work. 1. All reinforcing steel shall be deformed bars conforming to ASTM A -615, Grade 60. Vertical reinforcement shall be placed in the center of the masonry cell, and shall be held in position at the top and bottom. 2. If a slab dowel does not line —up with a vertical core, it shall not be sloped more than one horizontal in six verticals (1:6). 3. Horizontal wall reinforcement shall be standard truss type DUR —O —WAIL (or equivalent) at 16' o.c.. 4. Hollow Load— bearing Concrete Masonry Units shall be normal weight conforming to ASTM C -90, with a minimum compressive strength of 1,900 PSI. 5. Mortar shall be type M or S, in accordance with ASTM C -270. Place all masonry in running bond with 3/8" mortar joints. Provide complete coverage face shell mortar bedding, horizontal and vertical. 6. Coarse grout shall conform to ASTM C -476, with a maximum aggregate size of 3/8 ", 8" to 10' slump, and a minimum compressive strength of 2,500 PSI at 28 days. 7. Minimum 3" X 3" clean —out holes (saw —cut) are required at the bottom course of all cells to verify grout placement. Clean —outs shall be sealed after masonry inspection — provided in accordance with ACI 531 -4.6, and before grouting. 8. Prior to grouting, the grout space shall be clean, with no mortar projections greater the %", mortar droppings or other foreign material. All cells shall be in vertical alignment, and shall solidly be filled with coarse grout as specified. 9. During placing, grout shall be consolidated with flexible cable vibrator. First grout pour shall be stopped a minimum of 1 - 1/2' below the top of the middle bond beam masonry. 4' MINIMUM OR 1 I + M O FULL RAMP WIDTH 0000000o0000000000000000 I a o0o000000000000000000 aoo0000000000000000o0aoo 0000000 00 0000000000000 000000000000000000000000 < 000000000000000000000000 0000000o 000000000000000000000000 000000 000000000000000000000000 000000000000000ao00000 00000000000o0o0oa0oo0o00 000000000000000000000000 CS re 000000000000000000000000 0oo00000000000000 000000000000000000000000 000000 000000000000000000000000 00000aoo00000000c0o0oo000000000000 0ooa00 i J I a o0o000000000000000000 -FULL RAMP WIDTH _1 0o0000000caoo 000000 < 000000000000000000000000000 0000000o 000000 000000000000000ao00000 ao00000000000 000000 000000 CS re 000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000co0000 0oo00000000000000 0 000000 LL 00000aoo00000000c0o0oo000000000000 00000 > - 00000 00 000000000000000 0000 00000 000000 ooa 0000000000000000co 00000000000000 000000 00 000000000000000000 000 000000000 000000 0000 0000000000000000000000000000000 000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000 000000 000000000000000000000000000000o0000 11 d 14" Tie beam with 2 —#5 rebar continuous 12` 12' clearance clearance i! .• i —1 -0 at 4' center Swing gate (typ,) 6' --U �-- 3000 p.s.l. Concrete slab with fiber mesh reinforcing -- 8' monolithic, min 6' thickness, 6'x6'/ 10x10 w.W.F. - 81x16' concrete footing w/ 2- #5 continuous rebar (typ.) ELEVATION RM • r Ir 9 '6 @.'n 14' -8" F s � 76' dia, Steel bollards V conc. Fitted o w C$ 10` -8' U (typ) CL I O U� � I 48" D 0 12' Maxi clearance min. Q Q I . ♦ s A i . 8" Z300'0 p.s.i, concrete - 8'x 16' concrete stab with fiber mesh footing reinforcing - W/ 2- #5 rebar monolithic, Min 6' (typ.) thickness, 6'x6 " / 10x10 W.W.F. ELEVATION it i J 12:1 MAX. SECTION O —B I I—MIN cu 0 1. d- M a--, • IF �°-- 36' ., • - •, RING — SECTION Minimum Weight 7' 232 tbs. 9' 278 tbs. NOTES 1. Where roadway base is 8' or thicker use 9' ring, all other cases 7' ring Is permissible, 2. Manufacturers model of storm ring and cover to be approved by City Engineer. 3. Perforated covers, when required shall be similar to solid covers. Index See f . --Al Brick Masonary F4 MOW 8' 12° iii Bottom . - 1 li im MWIA . d . r SECTION 1 Ra r NOTES 1. ALL concrete to be 3000 p.s.i., With fiber mesh reinforcing. i lvs'112 aY a, t'4 1:1 STORM zr MANHOLE DE C REVISIONS 06-009 DAM #r It MKC CHECKED RP Q.0 r/w Line,,_) wry 6 Lot 2' NOTE-t SANITARY LATERALS TO BE WITHIN 10' OF CENTER OF LOT ON DOWNHILL SIDE OF CENTER OF LOT, LIM 11k,80f,"T NOTES, ELBOWS 1. 2' PVC CONDUIT TO EXTEND 2' BEHIND BACK OF CURB, BOTH SIDES OF ROADWAY (N❑T JOB w plRo REQUIRED ON SERVICE REPLACEMENT). 2. PVC CONDUIT TO BE MIN. 18' BELOW THE SURFACE MEASURED FROM TOP OF FACE OF CURB. 3, WATER MAINS TO BE MIN. 30' BELOW GRADE and APPR❑X, 4" BACK OF CURB 4, CURB STOP TO BE LOCATED APPROX. I FOOT BACK OF RIGHT-OF-WAY, 5, SERVICE LINE TO BE MIN. 12' and MAX. 18' BELOW GRADE, 8-1 Bl, OF >1 -Y 0 --1 1---2' (Typ.) GO 18'Min. 1 12'-18' 30' Min. I RRIMMEM Water Service Tubing Driscopipe 5100 or Endot/Yarelley BLue Jet, SDR 9, 3408 PolyethyLene \— Water Main SERVICE CONNECTION WWI, QJ N, L TYPICAL VALVE SETTING Adjustable.—. Valve Box When Valve Occurs in Road set Base on 10-Common Brick. 7y Ent-mGm n.t.s. �1 Water Main Mech, Joint VoLLV/ Restraining Joint tl I n.t.s. Back of Curb or mmllg- i cu f Mech. Joint Valve ONLY APPROVED &Kennedy Guardian No. K-81D %A - I Centurlan No, A 423 U.S. Pipe Metropolitan -ainin Joint (T ;tj .7 1-' PIVICI PIPE RESTRAINT ON ALL TEES, A MINIMUM OF 5' SHALL BE RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG L = MINIMUM LENGTH TO D r' RESTRAINEN EACH SIDE OF FITTING (ft) FIGURES BASED ON 30 DEPTH BURY, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE. 8' PVC MAXIMUM SIZE USED IN SYSTEM NOTE, THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND VALVES SHALL BE BY USE OF EBBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS, THRUST RESTRAINT BETWEEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA IRON- SERIES -1500 RESTRAINERS. END CONNECTION 919 OFF 2' Ball Valvez/111", P Hose Bibb 3/4' Galvanized --// 2' Galvanized-1 2' Corporation---. '-- Water Main CHLORINATION TAP ELBOWS (deq.) JOB w plRo 06-009 7 sin. 8-1 Bl, OF NOTE, THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND VALVES SHALL BE BY USE OF EBBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS, THRUST RESTRAINT BETWEEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA IRON- SERIES -1500 RESTRAINERS. END CONNECTION 919 OFF 2' Ball Valvez/111", P Hose Bibb 3/4' Galvanized --// 2' Galvanized-1 2' Corporation---. '-- Water Main CHLORINATION TAP NOTE= THRUST RESTRAINT ON SLIPJOINT DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE U,. PIPE FIELD LOCK GASKETS FOR TYT❑N JOINT PIPE or AMERICAN FAST-GRIP A GASKETS FOR AMERICAN FASTITE PIPE. THRUST RESTRAINT ON DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE USE OF MEGALUG RETAINERS AND MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS, ELBOWS (deg.) JOB w plRo 06-009 7 sin. 8-1 Bl, OF NOTE= THRUST RESTRAINT ON SLIPJOINT DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE U,. PIPE FIELD LOCK GASKETS FOR TYT❑N JOINT PIPE or AMERICAN FAST-GRIP A GASKETS FOR AMERICAN FASTITE PIPE. THRUST RESTRAINT ON DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE USE OF MEGALUG RETAINERS AND MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS, JOB w plRo 06-009 7 sin. 8-1 Bl, OF p #E yit t , 1. `¢� j 4 r , xtir t ;y r. r r. .� . . �w.... {p e, or Oro PAU- lef. IA I _. is . �.�.. L omomm"Wo MA4 q,!71-j - Gam_ 2 CAL k aywb 75 Vsa I - vw- 6-, OeFMC-,�,& ue 4p E fit% V7 egj�-< I MAI Z NIAWVIWA, 1211 A-o Lay- VSH-poLA. ILS�g vobA - IfIr-a-I vj"WtA.A DD 7 -ILUC,10", PARVI F�L'�o(2wM MA4��P4 VIV4114 t75�Al- \A"TvA omomm"Wo + }) ° � / d2f �) d: : : .� § .. .2 : ©,\ #<� .�, �] �w �\d\ /y ;� 2§2 #2\i\� »»» «�� � 1\ � � onotou"Ka �G L c C f LOCATED IN SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, L I A ■ 1 CURB INLET D CURB INLET D R E W STREET (C.R.108) CURB INLET TABLE LCURVE RADIUS BEARING ��xxca �P� j� * f l 1ff r P rii � CITY . � . RR SPIKE CORNER CERTIFIED SECTION ._, TRAFFIC (GNl BOXES CITY EASEMENT O.R. BOOK 6302,PG. 1747 F 4'x4° PLS 612 PR 11111 1 14-1 NM rm •y TABLE LCURVE RADIUS BEARING 1Y -• * f l , TRAMC_1 . . . ` Q .. , Sir i 1 k _ AcA POLE L PAINTI NAIL AND TIN TAB STRIP WAR OHW Tnnidad T .a Tem rEMPORARY BENCHMARK FIRE HYDRANT 7 /lf Y F/T FENCE TIE SANITARY MANHOLE BFP BACK FLOW PRE TER FRCI ti- S/W SIDEWALK LIGHT POLE WATER METER Le I CE NE CABLE BOX (D METAL POST WF WOOD FENCE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL loom c ELECTRIC BOX Yi>1.9t ane R/W RrGHT —OF —WAY Gix '� c8l SPRINKLER CONTROL BOX N &D NAIL AND DISK CONCR «,• E/P EDGE OF PA EL ELEVATION s:..'„" + "• '. ; _° '.' ;. ^. Lu • • *1 M LAJ i r P rii � CITY . � . RR SPIKE CORNER CERTIFIED SECTION ._, TRAFFIC (GNl BOXES CITY EASEMENT O.R. BOOK 6302,PG. 1747 F 4'x4° PLS 612 PR 11111 1 14-1 NM rm •y L'7 ca 4 0 ce 0 CL g � 1 CP n�ca i A CURME TABLE LCURVE RADIUS BEARING II -• * f l , • . . . ` Q .. , F V CUT FOUND i 1 k _ AcA .. L L'7 ca 4 0 ce 0 CL g � 1 CP n�ca i A CURME TABLE LCURVE RADIUS BEARING II -• * f l , • . . . ` Q .. , F V CUT FOUND 1 I a DOUBLEV z CHECK VALVE LOT 1 � n r NOT INCLUDED t VICIN TY MAP NQTTOSCAIE BRIL BEARING REFERENCE a • REBAR NO CAP F. -• (P) PLAT p OPEN PIPE SIZE AS NOTED • . . . ` Q 1/2" RE AND LB /6168 RN&7T F V CUT FOUND i k _ AcA .. eeemuda BW NAIL AND TIN TAB PC POINT OF CURVATURE VICIN TY MAP NQTTOSCAIE BRIL BEARING REFERENCE a • REBAR NO CAP F. -• (P) PLAT p OPEN PIPE SIZE AS NOTED FPP FOUND PINCHED PIPE SIZE AS NOTED Q 1/2" RE AND LB /6168 RN&7T F V CUT FOUND k _ AcA eeemuda BW NAIL AND TIN TAB PC POINT OF CURVATURE GAS VALVE PRM PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT Tnnidad T .a Tem rEMPORARY BENCHMARK FIRE HYDRANT 7 PI POINT OF INTERSECTION DRAINAGE MANHOLE FES FLARED END SECTION F/T FENCE TIE SANITARY MANHOLE BFP BACK FLOW PRE TER S/W SIDEWALK LIGHT POLE WATER METER WIRE crb POWER POLE GUY WIRE CE NE CABLE BOX (D METAL POST WF WOOD FENCE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL loom c ELECTRIC BOX Yi>1.9t ane R/W RrGHT —OF —WAY Gix '� VICIN TY MAP NQTTOSCAIE BRIL BEARING REFERENCE a • REBAR NO CAP F. -• (P) PLAT p OPEN PIPE SIZE AS NOTED FPP FOUND PINCHED PIPE SIZE AS NOTED • . E MEASUREMENT 1/2" RE AND LB /6168 RN&7T F V CUT FOUND PCP PERMANENT L POINT SET L D DISK LB /6166 (P) PLAT SET IRON ROD ROB POINT OF BEGINNING 1/2" RE AND LB /6168 RN&7T PCP PERMANENT L POINT SET L D DISK LB /6166 POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NAIL AND TIN TAB PC POINT OF CURVATURE GAS VALVE PRM PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT WATER VALVE Tem rEMPORARY BENCHMARK FIRE HYDRANT PI POINT OF INTERSECTION DRAINAGE MANHOLE FES FLARED END SECTION F/T FENCE TIE SANITARY MANHOLE BFP BACK FLOW PRE TER S/W SIDEWALK LIGHT POLE WATER METER WIRE crb POWER POLE GUY WIRE CE NE CABLE BOX (D METAL POST WF WOOD FENCE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE ELECTRIC BOX R/W RrGHT —OF —WAY C/i CURB TIE c8l SPRINKLER CONTROL BOX N &D NAIL AND DISK CONCR «,• E/P EDGE OF PA EL ELEVATION s:..'„" + "• '. ; _° '.' ;. ^. Lu