Loading...
FLS2007-08039FLS2007-08039 2849 SHADY OAK CT VOSOTAS RESIDENCE Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ Ir s CASE #: t^ S 07.1QID • 4 99d RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ORIGIML RECEIVED All Ir Q l 2007 PiANNINC DEPARTMENT CRY OF CLEARWATER FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project - Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) (Revised 04/24/2007) — PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) APPLICANT NAME:— XdC�d�"p MAILING ADDRESS: i- -1.._. lQrb►.. GT/ �'Lw'.,!...i c!.,4- ......__._? PHONE NUMBER: 'IZ'� ^ZZ7�P- -- ....._.. FAX NUMBER: + CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed 12d, It A 101C ^1-4A- L AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER:_�L() S`"J2q- FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: -72"7 (7 EMAIL: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: Vbs,&rCas RG-SIt2ENIGE PROJECT VALUATION STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): 20 2� ((O 551 GGL7 0SW .. - -- — PARCEL SIZE (acres): , 90 PARCEL SIZE (square feet) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I-or 5& � tmc) oav_ w=6 /Np Air o o , „ , PROPOSED USE(S): t'1_--VA6ft0 (,eA(Z _- 1M 0';W 'Idv 3 -701 tie .,5 c't"C Nrvr J+LUWS rC4 l4CC8566 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: &IZ65 fl'u" W� r ° fjea- G►errc. uSG AJt7 `P -0 Its PAC- S•.- �b -L�3 Con(�u►foG= ES...'.5�a Specifically identify the request o (include number of units or square O . _ ._ T._......... .._......._..._ ............._._ footage of non - residential use and all(YsWl6-4 3-7-41 lu2A&41111 Ail dWS CWL A, IS HOW. 13LO&,Nou4 requested code deviations; e.g. ACS ?ZtR+rifx^� >5 1'al1- iJ�' 17� 10' �� l�0-7P3T%E_�:1D reduction in required number of - {- 1 � - -. �I t � �Q6._&k'{4L -S_ �{�.Ep - -iHJ-- parking spaces, specific use, etc.) 44ftk, rb2 14 I �r �, 04 51AtrF CiDocuments and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop \planningfonns_0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04- 24 -07.doc Page I of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), J PJAEVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. "ft- fW6W-) *%Z9V.A4 19or"Z 4 IS w►TIRIN UewW . -j'j}e (LC•tC qC &-J) Kidd"►- IN ey1Z6 AA)V tWI4/16 _ DoTO ANp FAEA— ONat Ml': rtli -"A614 S06 MO ftW 4T WITH � f= �./rSl.>C sTgN!�(? 1�� �j?1 , �?2oe_CSS.......ToC..._0'*NS?i NC/ M 6 l S AD66a Oft+ 4712e Tb ALL" THIS S77r?,+IY4ytl; 40+44- HMriMe Of .L i w fts @q � *tom' P- t, 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. -r�g btu %NL. r4IMC�L LAy A fSgJUr --Cr, WIC E"b-M 450&0 u�!ivgt( (_ cN��nc+� __ PE IIM_P"0$6)�> Ae6y %01Z1f.._`51-[ to -NfZE ,e7#061U6t rw1.L1.. A i 6A-VC i4flirT ....... - __- 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. _'vwCAA11- 1 oPc r� 14 14-\1 EWCA ." fZr*RNcc . ez>NJ &5- icvQ W)t-1, G_..._G'�C I 'fie 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. _ —��'! �l._� 4� ��C.�,� c 1_!'�►?� M ►9'CGI+b__.1/�%�__ 1�%(�� k1 Cl�".�1�J'� +�SF�1Z�l.� _-,,/u/�� ,.�, 1---1^Y A40 IotLI. !r��•J12 e1e1�11`/ 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. -LW—m IIAw 7 16 S' 11 m4,L a %4Mr% "[ _._ ��-1qS X ._. 1�_ d'!!7prF1v&J� To j° Prte7 w&U. 6 _,fah 5-1ar,-� Aw- -->._.._wiw N*✓E L-tTIL.6 rJo A;fr� V )S OrLL-�-( pow ;f T1,4 C: \Documents and Settings\ derek. ferguson\ Desktopiplanningfonns _0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04- 24- 07.doc Page 2 of 8 012007 PLANNING DEPARTMEM CIT1' OF CLEARWATER WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. -The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. ............ 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. ...... . ... . ......... 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ............ ...... ....... 6. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. RECOM AlIG 01 2007 PmNiNGDEPARTMEW Cri OF CLEARWATER CADocurnents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\ResidentiaI Infill Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ❑ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing. topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; . ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. -g!57&-15 ,GIT1 W*W 4(111� ?L^ -J ?AI�.O fi;,Vt (4AWj4`I'IV(3 AW2 Sl1 � l3- Latl1A'Ij(y�jLj CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you.have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) —please design around the existing trees; TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees;. ❑ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ❑ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C Documents and Settings\ derek. ferguson \Desktop\planningforms_0707 \Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04- 24 -07.doc Page 4 of 8 ORIGINAL RECEMD A! IG 01 2001 PLANNING ©EPARTlNIEW C17YOF CLMWATER G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; 4._ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; _._.. -_ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including _ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations; gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening — (per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; �w Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. O SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED L _ Land area in square feet and acres; �F^ -� IiC01 �L ,�� � 7 — Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, -- expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building heights; and structure Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and 3 ° • �_ �It1RL• Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 'Zo 02kk6 AP REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); u>tuZ7 FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; u` Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; N All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; ------ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); ''ppAA00 ORIG.M Structural overhangs; M---- CADocuments and Settings \derek.ferguson\ Desktop \planningforms_0707\Residential In ill Project (FLS) 04- 24 -07.doc 0 2 01 Page 5 of 8 1ri PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CL WATER H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): All existing and proposed structures; — Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; — Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including d6plines (as indicated on required — tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant — schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8% X 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS – with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS –same as above to scale on 8'/2 X 11. OWGINAL RECMD AUG 01 2007 P1Mt1114GGEPAMEW CHY OF CLU%WATER CADocumenls and Settings\derek.ferguson\ Desktop \planningfonns_0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04- 24 -07.doc Page 6 of 8 ONGINAL RECEIVED J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) o �li�NN«� Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: "N ON G ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a " Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727 - 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ❑ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. K. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ❑ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow CalculationsA/Vater Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS. Sworn to and subscribed before me this 3 I day of , A.D. 20 ® 7 to me and /or by a/C- 4)4c1. —R/7T14 , who is personally known has produced as identification. commission expires: SANDRA J. VOROS MY COMMISSION # DO 350651 CADocuments and Settings\ derek .ferguson \Desktop\planningfonns 0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS ^ o Page 7 of 8 EXPIRES: Aug. 29, 2008 .,. of •F`o! BONDED THRU CNA SURETY M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: reTt'45Z V oSo7k4� NL40f ��Sorl�h 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2 51 �a�f zm-y- GT f Gu - � S31 Ce I 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Q�4"- BUT iG 1' 1 c.40y -_ - pf- All ia'.Ct�S� SDI-q TV-6 f f 61ce lo- t► : r�s � �t- A `1 s G 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: MI&+ *eL as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/we), the und efsigned authority, herebb rtify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property`Owner Property Owner /-X V4 ea: V Pr dy Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this so Y da of 200 personally appeared who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he /she signed. NOTARY PUBLIC -STATE OF FLORIDA Philip Lopez, III Commission # DD359681 .� �� ��jj F:�r,ires: NOV. 20, 2008 Notary Public Si nature ra u ,u ":dc Bonding Co., Inc. Notary Seonjed My Commission Expires: 2-0 12,06 ORIGINAL RECEIVED .,1 0 12007 C.Mocanents and SetBngsWerekferguson% DesldopWanningforms _07OMesiden6al Infill Project (FLS) 042407.doc PLANNING DEPAWEVE Page 8 of 8 CIW OF CLEP,I WATER zouE MAP lLI m 600'ft =.. A flax `god Dt I �'r. dN (Heather TrI Clubhouse Dr 5! .�...i1�eaadow Oak Dr N IL Mayfair Ct abal Springs Or, Atli DBO --- -.. - --� a Luce, ?r N Cascade Dr — tm ® 2Oq Ih /ap4uest dnc. 0 2DG7 t 1 1V TEA afGIRL RMD ,A! lf, 012007 TW o f CLUrWA ER c Septa 8/1/2007 Receipt #: 1200700000000006613 10:57:50AM q Date: 08 /01/2007 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLS2007 -08039 01 Flex Std - Residential Accessory 010 - 341262 50.00 Line Item Total: $50.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check BEHAR DESIGN INC R D 1068 In Person 50.00 Payment Total: $50.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 14, 2007 Behar Design Jordan Behar 2657 Augusta Drive South Clearwater, FL 33761 U ITY OF C LEARWATE R POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2007 -08039 at 2849 Shady Oak Court Dear Mr. Behar: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4 -202.E of the Community Development Code. On September 6, 2007 the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval for an accessory structure with a size in excess of ten percent (21.5 %) of the gross floor area of the principle structure and an increase in height from 15 feet to 16.5 feet as per Sections 3- 201.B.5 and 8 of the Community Development Code. The DRC recommended DENIAL of the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Bases of Denial: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. That subject parcel comprises 0.90 acres and is located on the southeast corner of the Shady Oak Court cul -de -sac; 2. That the subject property is located within the Low Density Residential (LDR) District and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan Category; 3. That currently the site is developed with a detached dwelling; 4. That the applicant seeks relief from required 10 percent limitation for accessory structures under Code provisions of Section 3- 201.B.5; 5. That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this site; and 6. That adjacent uses are zoned Low Density Residential (LDR), Low medium Density Residential (LMDR) and Open Space Recreation (OS/R). CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the standards and criteria of Sections 2- 101.1.and 2 -102; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" r Mr. Behar Page — Two FLS2007 -08039 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the accessory uses /structures criteria of Section 3- 201.B; 3. The proposal is not in compliance with each and every general applicability criteria per Section 3- 913 of the Community Development Code; 4. That the proposed increase in gross floor area of the accessory structure is not consistent with the character of adjacent properties and the community character of the immediate vicinity; and 5. The development is not compatible with the surrounding area. BASES OF DENIAL: 1. That the development does not meet the character of adjacent properties (3 -913); and 2. That the development does not meet the community character of the immediate vicinity (3 -913). An appeal of a Level One approval (flexible standard) may be initiated by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review, which is the subject of the approval within seven days of the date the application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for this case expires on November 21, 2007. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Scott Kurleman, Planner II, at 727 -562- 4567x2504. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director SAPlanning Department \C D B\Flex Standard (FLS)\Pending Cases\2 - Reviewed and Pending \Shady Oak Ct 2849 (LDR) 09 -06 -07 SK \Shady Oak 2849 - DO Denial.doc Tr . CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner /Applicant: Representative: Address: December 18, 2007 APP2007 -00004 G2 Peter and Paula Vosotas Michael Roth/ Behar Design Incorporated 2849 Shady Oak Court CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: cop� REQUEST: An appeal from a Level One (flexible standard development) approval decision pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4- 501.A.3, that a requested increase in the gross floor area of an accessory structure from ten percent to 21.5 percent of the gross floor area of the principle structure and an increase in the allowable height from 15 feet to 16.5 feet is inconsistent with General Standards for Level One Approvals as set forth in CDC Sections 3- 913.A. Land 3- 913A.5. EXISTING ZONING/ LAND USE: LDR, Low Density Residential; RU, Residential Urban Category PROPERTY SIZE: 0.90 acres; 39,612 square feet PROPERTY USE: Existing Use: Detached Dwelling Proposed Use: Detached Accessory Structure ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USES: North: Low Density Residential/ Detached Dwelling West: Open Space/Recreation District/ Open Space (golf course) East: Low Density Residential/ Detached Dwelling South: Low Medium Density Residential/ Detached Dwelling CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Detached dwellings with no accessory structures dominate the immediate vicinity. BACKGROUND: The subject parcel comprises 0.90 acres located on the southeast corner of the Shady Oak Court cul -de- sac. Shady Oak Court is located on the south side of Landmark Drive approximately 280 feet northwest of the intersection of Knollwood Court and Landmark Drive. This parcel is located on the Countryside Country Club Golf Course. Staff Report — Community Development Board— December 18, 2007 - Case APP2007 -00004 - Page 1 L, .a. On August 1, 2007, a Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application was submitted requesting an increase in the allowable gross floor area of an accessory structure from ten percent of the gross floor area of the principle structure to 21.5 percent and an increase in the allowable building height from 15 feet to 16.5 feet. Following the determination of Completeness on August 9, 2007 notification letters were sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject proposal. Five letters of opposition were received by the Planning Department (copies attached). CDC Section 3- 913.A.1 requires proposed development of land to be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties and Section 3- 913.A.5 requires the development to be consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. Review by staff show no accessory structures adjacent to the subject property or within the immediate vicinity. At the September 6, 2007 Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting staff informed the applicant and his representatives that the submitted materials did not support approval for the proposal based on the above criteria. The applicant's agent asked for clarification of the staff interpretation and indicated additional materials supporting the application would be provided. Subsequently the agent provided a narrative comparing the proposal's Floor Area Ratio (FAR) favorably with area properties and listing three (3) addresses with accessory structures (copy attached). Staff review of this further submission determined that the provided addresses were for accessory structures over a mile from the subject property thereby not meeting the adjacent or immediate area standard and that FAR only addressed a portion of the requirement to be in scale, bulk, coverage, density and character standard. On November 14, 2007, in the absence of the submittal of further evidence sufficient to make positive findings concerning the application, the Community Development Coordinator issued a development order denying the application. The development order (copy attached) was therefore denied based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. That subject parcel comprises 0.90 acres and is located on the southeast corner of the Shady Oak Court cul -de -sac; 2. That the subject property is located within the Low Density Residential (LDR) District and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan Category; 3. That currently the site is developed with a detached dwelling; 4. That the applicant seeks relief from required 10 percent limitation for accessory structures under Code provisions of Section 3- 201.B.5; 5. That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this site; and 6. That adjacent uses are zoned Low Density Residential (LDR), Low medium Density Residential (LMDR) and Open Space Recreation (OS/R). CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the standards and criteria of Sections 2 -101. Land 2- 102; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the accessory uses /structures criteria of Section 3- 201.13; 3. The proposal is not in compliance with each and every general applicability criteria per Section 3- 913 of the Community Development Code; Staff Report — Community Development Board— December 18, 2007 - Case APP2007 -00004 - Page 2 a� 4. That the proposed increase in gross floor area of the accessory structure is not consistent with the character of adjacent properties and the community character of the immediate vicinity; and 5. The development is not compatible with the surrounding area. An appeal from the above Level One (flexible standard development) decision was fled on behalf of the property owner by Behar Design, Inc. on November 21, 2007, consistent with the timeframe established for an appeal to be initiated in CDC Section 4- 502.A. Pursuant to CDC Section 4- 501.A.3, the Community Development Board (CDB) has the authority to hear appeals from Level One (flexible standard development) decisions. Pursuant to CDC Section 4- 504.A, the CDB shall review the application, the recommendation of the Community Development Coordinator, conduct a quasi-judicial public hearing on the application, and render a decision in accordance with the provisions of CDC Section 4- 206.13.5 granting the appeal, granting the appeal subject to specified conditions, or denying the appeal. It is noted that pursuant to CDC Section 4- 504.13, in order to grant an appeal, overturning or modifying the decision appealed from, the CDB shall find that based on substantial competent evidence presented by the applicant or other party that each and every one of the following criteria are met: 1. The decision appealed from misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions of this development code; and 2. The decision of the CDB will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this development code; and 3. The decision of the CDB will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: /P ` '¢'�6��'���� A. Scott Kurleman, Planner ATTACHMENTS: Development Order Issued on November 14, 2007 Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Photos Resume S: (Planning DepartmenhC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)IPending Cases12 -Reviewed and Pendingkshady Oak Ct 2849 (LDR) Appeal 12 -18 -07 CDB- SKIStaff Report - Vosotas.doc Staff Report — Community Development Board— December 18, 2007 - Case APP2007 -00004 - Page 3 ArcIMS Viewer 1* 0 Page 1 of 1 http: / /publicgis.m3, clear, eater. com/ website /eConnectGIS /MapFr-ame.htm 8/20./2007 ArcIM;i Viewer 0 1* ?E ge - c f 1 http: / /p- iblicgis.nycic arwattr. cam/ website /eConnectGI S/M apFrame. htm 8'20/) -q )7 ' SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 28S., RANGE ISE. i �d�° �� @uQd [Evflmag CERTIFIED TO: PETER VOSOTOS 8"LIGUSTRUM `9 1460 BELTREES STREET UNIT 9 DUNEDIN. FL 34898 (727)734 -3821 11 "P LM O 9M SHADY OAK COURT If w. �1b I H. SURVEY DESCRIPTION WAS AS PROVIDED BY CLIENT. 2 SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WRHCIT BENEFIT OF AN ABSTRACT OF 711LE. \ A OTHER THAN SHOWN ON PLAT 'HS FIRM HAS MADE NO ATTEMPT TO RESEARCH A SURVEY OF: LOT 36, LANDMARK WOODS 2ND ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK INSTRUMENTS A RECORD REFLECTING NOT SH INN ON RIGHTS WAY. AND/Q7 OWNERSHIP THAT MAY EXIST BUT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. 77, PAGES 29 -31, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. 4. NO UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS WERE LOCATED. 15-PALM a PRINTED DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON DRAWING SUPERCEDE SCALED DIMENSIONS. ITEMS MAY BE ORARIN OUT OF SCALE 10 GRAPHICALLY SHOW ENCROACHMENTS AND/OR \ _ ERUIPa USE d. USE OF THIS SURVEY BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE CERTIFIED TO WILL BE AT 1HE a 9s. RE -USERS SOLE RISK, WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYCR. / DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION 7, ELEVAMONS ARE BASED UPON AN ASSUMED DATUM. 8. UNLESS OTHERM/SE NOTED, FOUND CORNERS HAVE NO IDENTIFYING CAP OR 06C. (TYPICAL) C NOTE: FDA FOUND CRETE MONUMENT �T : CONCRETE EASEMENT CIO 0 0 6�oRT� Rl ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED, USING MANHOLE IN SHADY OAX COURT AS 80.00. PINCH PIPE Mme- a DRAINAGE FFIR I FOUND IRON FN/0- FOUND NAIL IN DISK C CALCULATED 91/p. NNL IN DISK P PLAT SIR .RON ROD (7 /Y) LB/8425 D DEED SANITARY SEWER f 1 ' MG BASIS LINE (PER PLAT) �wL w ON LINE = FlELDMANHOLE i UINSURANCE PCP MANENT CONIRCL PCNT RATE MAP FIRM -FLOW ,' - PRM PERMANENT REFERENCE YONUMENT _ • — CONC. WALK SO 6 Pl� r /z. I i t � 1 C r w 1 ira 1 9 "PALM 0 9 "PALM 0 �7 t 10 9 "PALM i � yl o wl Z I W aI i � 1 I i t 63 0 PIP 5/8" 0 15"PINE �I ♦�,i,',�,, III ♦I♦ ♦I ♦I ♦I I ♦I V I I I t' •�• 20 "OAK 6'•.9".15 "OAK 12 ".15 "OAK 0 0 0 28" OAK N 390 00' 00" W 12"PINE (BEARING BASIS) 0 12 "PINE B "PINE 0 0 10 "PINE FIRM Zone " X " , Per Panel No. 12103 C 0088G (09- 03 -03) 8j P 5/8" \ \ N ai 0 dog Q3c� �B 9 mss• \0j 0 10 "PALM V 4' CLUSTER OF q) 6" PALMS ----------- �- ---------------------------------------------- f0 D".. AND UTILITY EsmT PLAT BOUNDARY, (F, /M) 295.00' © V Q 2-� R O v 0 0 O Oj \\ O \ tAy �p \ 18 "PALM \ \\\ O 10•'PALM \\\ 14 "PALM ------ - - - - - -- - O 10 "PALM PCM 4" \_ / / 07 -096 _03.07 (SURVEY IR 1FTD17T• SEAL) ONGIN L RECEMD AUG 01 2007 p"WING GEPARTMEM CITY OF CI.URWATER CURVE DATA ® RADIUS= 50.00' ARC= 53.65' CHORD= 51.11' (P) S 72° 45' 07" E (P) CHORD= 51.01' (M) S 72° 54' 35" E (M) SCALE: 1 " =30' DRAWN BY: JCB CAD FILE: LANDMARKWOODS2 -LOT36 CRD FILE: LANDMn6.cr5 �1 9 c9 sM1,. 8"LIGUSTRUM `9 "PALM 11 "P LM O 9M If w. �1b I #2849 15-PALM .0 a 9s. 20 "OAK 6'•.9".15 "OAK 12 ".15 "OAK 0 0 0 28" OAK N 390 00' 00" W 12"PINE (BEARING BASIS) 0 12 "PINE B "PINE 0 0 10 "PINE FIRM Zone " X " , Per Panel No. 12103 C 0088G (09- 03 -03) 8j P 5/8" \ \ N ai 0 dog Q3c� �B 9 mss• \0j 0 10 "PALM V 4' CLUSTER OF q) 6" PALMS ----------- �- ---------------------------------------------- f0 D".. AND UTILITY EsmT PLAT BOUNDARY, (F, /M) 295.00' © V Q 2-� R O v 0 0 O Oj \\ O \ tAy �p \ 18 "PALM \ \\\ O 10•'PALM \\\ 14 "PALM ------ - - - - - -- - O 10 "PALM PCM 4" \_ / / 07 -096 _03.07 (SURVEY IR 1FTD17T• SEAL) ONGIN L RECEMD AUG 01 2007 p"WING GEPARTMEM CITY OF CI.URWATER CURVE DATA ® RADIUS= 50.00' ARC= 53.65' CHORD= 51.11' (P) S 72° 45' 07" E (P) CHORD= 51.01' (M) S 72° 54' 35" E (M) SCALE: 1 " =30' DRAWN BY: JCB CAD FILE: LANDMARKWOODS2 -LOT36 CRD FILE: LANDMn6.cr5 �1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 9, 2007 Mr. Michael Roth Behar Design 2657 Augusta Drive South Clearwater, Florida 33761 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLS2007 -08039 — 2849 Shady Oak Court — Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Roth: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2007- 08039. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, September 6, 2007, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562- 4567x2504 or scoff.kurlemanLumyclearwatencom. Sincerely yours, Scott Kurleman Planner 11 FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" I - "i August 7, 2007 City Of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: FLS2007 -08039 -2849 Shady Oak Court — Letter of Incompleteness Attn: Scott Kurlman, Planner II Dear Mr. Kurleman. The following information is being provided in response to your letter dated August 7, 2007. Comment no. 1: The application as submitted is incomplete. Please provide written response to the flexibility criteria as set forth in Section 2 -103 cf the community development Code. Response no. 1: Section 2 -103, Flexible criteria; detached dwellings; A; The proposed new detached garage is to be constructed on an existing residential lot. The proposed structure will be used only as an accessory structure; detached garage. There is an existing Viburnum landscape buffer between the proposed accessory structure and adjacent property owners. Please see photo's attached to the application. Comment no 2: The application includes requests for additional square footage and height for the accessory structure; however the application does not include a request to allow the driveway to encroach into the required side vard setback (a reduction from 15 feet to 7 feet.) Revise the application. Reponse no. 2: On our submitted Flexible Standard Development Application, Section B — Description of Request, we have two items listed. In addition to those two items, we are requesting a side setback relief for the proposed extension or the paver driveway. We have aligned the proposed new driveway with the existing driveway which sits T -0" from the property line. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Michael Roth BEHAR DESIGN INC. 2657 Augusta Drive South I Clearwater I Fiorida 1 33761 i IGINAL RECEIVED BUG 0 8 2001 tING DRAMMEi CITY Of CLEARWATER 727 647 5529 PH 1 727 939 0254 F PIANNJNG DEPAWI MP.N'I August 7, 2007 Mr. Michael Roth Behar Design 2657 Augusta Drive South Clearwater, Florida 33761 CITY' OF CLEARWATER Pos-r Orm:t;. Px)x 4748, C.Lwwxmi, 1`'r.c mom 337584748 MUNICIPAL SiA(VICI•:S RUILDING, 100 SULITH .MYMnt.y.. AwNUr:, CUAi(wA:n ;u, fLC)R1nA 33756 TrLaPICUNP. (727) 562./667 I m (727) 562.4865 Re: FLS2007 -08039 — 2849 Shady Oak Court — Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Roth: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FI,S2007- 0$039. I After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: 1. The application as submitted is incomplete. Please provide written response to the flexibility criteria as set forth in Section 2 -103 of the Community Development Code; and 2. The application includes requests for addtionul square footage and height for the accessory structure; however the application does not includes a request to allow the driveway to encroach into the required side setback (a reduction from 15 fact to 7 feet). Revise the application. Pursuant to Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plants and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Monday, August 13, 2007. Should you have any questionti, please do not hesitate to contact n e. if you have auy .questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562 - 4567x2504 or sc�tt.kuclennn(a >m cicar_watz.l:.cona. rely yours, , �'� RECEIVED Mv Scott Kurleman 6105 08 2007 Planner IT ,,_, 19 DEPARTMEN' CITI Of 6LORWANER FKANx 1.11MAI u, MAYOP JUNN DOI", CUUNCILMITMAER j.13j011NS0N, COUNCILMPM91:1t BU.1,JONSON, COUNUTAMMBER ® Cmu.N A. PETMEN, COUNUINKM" M "EoUAL EM111DYMrNT ANo APPIRMA'I'm: ArTION LM1)I,0YY.R" Zd WHT0:80 2_00Z Z0 -6nH S98t7Z9S22z: 'ON XHJ WONA PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 7, 2007 Mr. Michael Roth Behar Design 2657 Augusta Drive South Clearwater, Florida 33761 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLS2007 -08039 — 2849 Shady Oak Court — Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Roth: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLS2007- 08039. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: f 1. The application as submitted is incomplete. Please provide written response to the flexibility criteria as set forth in Section 2 -103 of the Community Development Code; and 1 2. The application includes requests for addtional square footage and height for the accessory structure; however the application does not includes a request to allow the driveway to encroach into the required side setback (a reduction from 15 feet to 7 feet). Revise the application. Pursuant to Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Monday, August 13, 2007. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562- 4567x2504 or Scott .kurleman @,Imyclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, I � Scott Kurleman Planner Il FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° } Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~_ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562 -4567 FAX: (727) 562 -4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: August 7, 2007 To: Michael Roth, Behar Design (727) 939 -0254 From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLS2007 -08039 — 2849 Shady Oak Court Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.te„(fK( niyclearwater.coin ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at "winyclearwater.com ** Willa Is Aug. 07 2007 08:41AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 99390254 Aug.07 08:40AM 00'58 SND 02 OK i TO Tim OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING ' +' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, RB:E E CALL 1- 800 -HELP -FAX C435- 7329). PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 16, 2007 C INY OF C LEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 2849 SHADY OAK CT (FLS2007- 08039) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 2849 Shady Oak Court, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development approval for an accessory structure with a size in excess of ten percent (21.5 %) of the gross floor area of the principle structure and an increase in height from 15 feet to 16.5 feet as per Sections 3- 201.B.5 and 8 of the Community Development Code. On September 6, 2007, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be September 6, 2007. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at (727) 562 -4539 or via email at scott.kurlemanCwmyclearwater.com for further information, visit -our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case, which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on September 6, 2007. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwatencom. Sincerely yours, Scott Kurleman Planner H FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCH MEMBER ® CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" COUNTRYSIDE CNTRY CLUB INC PO BOX 4900 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85261 - 4900 KESSLER, MARSHALL KESSLER, ELLYN 2914 HEATHER CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3312 VOSOTAS, PETER L VOSOTAS, PAULA J 2849 SHADY OAK CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2829 TANGALAKIS, STANLEY G TANGALAKIS, NANCY K 2862 SHADY OAK CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2829 BORJA, MARY E 2847 FOXWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2819 VEGA, OSCAR E VEGA, BRENDA N 2848 FOXWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2819 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 DAY, ALVIN T DAY, LILLIAN H 2912 MILL STREAM CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3341 MESSINA, ANTHONY P MESSINA, DOROTHY H 2889 KNOLLWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 -,3318 130o7 0801-Z q CLEARWATER, CITY OF P O BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 WILSON, DAVID B WILSON, KAREN D 2861 SHADY OAK CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2829 THEIL, RICHARD A THEIL, JOYCE E 2850 SHADY OAK CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2829 ALT, STEPHEN K ALT, REBECA S 2859 FOXWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2819 MULLETT, MARSHA P LIVING TRUST MULLETT, MARSHA P THE 2841 FOXWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2819 SAVAS, CHRISTOPHER L SAVAS, MONIQUE M 2854 FOXWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2819 WHITELEATHER, CRAIG T WHITELEATHER, MARY B 2905 MILL STREAM CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3341 BERMAN, SUSAN A 2918 MILL STREAM CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3341 MULINGTAPANG, REYNALDO CARREON, MARIA J 2883 KNOLLWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3318 JOHNSON, PAMELA A JOHNSON, DEANNA H 2920 HEATHER CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3312 RUMPF, PAUL V RUMPF, REBECCA A 2855 SHADY OAK CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2829 JAYE, DAVID L JAYE, KAKTHLEEN A 2856 SHADY OAK CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2829 MITCHELL, BRADLEY W MITCHELL, MARGEANNE 2853 FOXWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2819 BERG,ROBERT BERG, ALICE 2842 FOXWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2819 SIMPSON, THOMAS N SIMPSON, MARIA J 2860 FOXWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2819 SZETO, C W SZETO, LI SING 2906 MILL STREAM CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3341 LEHMAN, MARIANNE 2895 KNOLLWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3318 BOSLEY, JOHN W BOSLEY, EDNA L 2876 KNOLLWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3318 BURGESS, WILLIAM R HUGILL, WILLIAM J FIORILLO, JOHN P BURGESS, VICTORIA L HUGILL, SHIRLEY D FIORILLO, FLORENCE B 2882 KNOLLWOOD CT 2888 KNOLLWOOD CT 2894 KNOLLWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3318 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3318 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3318 A -p -'ark. CITY OF CLEARWATER i PLANNING DEPARTMENT :9�ATEP,;�� POST ONCE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 EA&le GIM /Jb CITY OF CLEARWATER o °. PLANNING DEPARTMENT =� POST OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 GPILVUJdi,PJ2 I�elltk��LDYI�G� CDQI +IDr� �C P�r�Ate✓ > FL 33�15�' "-4 rest DoE �J��I+ ,Pinellas County Property Apprai� -- - Information: 20 28 16 49857 000 0360 Page 3 of 4 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 20 1 28 1 18 1 49857 000 1 0360 :01 20- Aug -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:05:11 Residential Card 01 of i Prop Use: 210 Land Use: 01 Living Units: i Imp Type: Single Family Prop Address: 2849 SHADY OAK CT Structural E1E3msnts Foundation Continuous Wall Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall ConcBk Stucco /Reclad Roof Frame Gable -Hip Roof Cover Composite Shingle # Stories i.0 Floor Finish Crpt /HdTI /HdMar /Prgt Interior Finish Drywall /Plaster Quality Year Built Effective Heating Cooling Fixtures Other Depr Functional Econonomic Sub Arcais Above Auerage 1.981 Age 10 Central Duct Cooling (Central) 17 Bciation 0 Depreciation 0 Depreciation 0 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http: // 136 .174.187.131htbin /cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &r = &s =1 &u= 0 &p= 20 +28 +16 +49857... 8/20/2007 Description Factor ea Description Factor Area Year 1} 2) Base Area i. 00 Enclosed Porch .60 3, 330 `'` 7) 8) 3 3� (� . 00 .00 0 0 2) 3) Open Porch " .20 580 9} 3,200 .00 0 ENCLOSURE 4) Garage .35 88 10) �� .00 0 12.00 5} .00 0 11) U .00 0 0 6) .00 0 12} t [ .00 0 0 0 Rq=--=j.dcn-tia►1 Extra �Fcatur�s �z Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http: // 136 .174.187.131htbin /cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &r = &s =1 &u= 0 &p= 20 +28 +16 +49857... 8/20/2007 Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) POOL 14X32 21,000.00 1 21,000 121180 11981 2) FIREPLACE 51000.00 1 51000 3,200 1,981 3) ENCLOSURE 5.00 1,956 0 9,490 2,005 4) PATIO /DECK 12.00 400 4,800 21780 1,981 5} .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 27,650 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http: // 136 .174.187.131htbin /cgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &r = &s =1 &u= 0 &p= 20 +28 +16 +49857... 8/20/2007 Pinellas County Property Apprai -- Information: 20 28 16 49857 000 0360 Page 2 of 4 20 1 28 1 10 1 49857 1 000 1 0300 20- Aug -2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:05:10 Ownership Information Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales UOSOTAS, PETER L OBK: 05047 OPG; 2042 UOSOTAS, PAULA 3 2849 SHADY OAK CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 -2829 EVAC: Non -EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr; 2849 SHADY OAK CT of Jan 1, 2007, based on Census Tract; 268.11 sales from 2005 - 2006; Sale Date OR Book /Page Price (Qual /UnQ) Vac /Imp 641,200 Plat Information 0 /1,980 5,04712,042 64,000 (Q) U 1977: Book 077 Pgs 029 -031 0 11,978 4,7ii/ 976 21,800 (Q) U 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 2007 Value EXEMPTIONS Just /Market: 552,300 Homestead: YES Ownership % 1.000 SAVE -OUR -HOMES CAP Govt Exem; NO Use %: 1.000 Assessed /Cap: 287,150 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt; .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable; 262,150 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Golf Course Clearwater View: 06 Millage; 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes; 5,553.00 1) 156 x 150 21000.00 156.00 F Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save -Our -Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 12, 287.95 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be ; 12, 832.05 Short Legal LANDMARK WOODS 2ND ADD LOT 36 Description Building Information http: // 136 .174.187.131htbinlcgi- scr3 ?o =1 &a =1 &b =1 &r = &s =l &u= 0 &p= 20 +28 +16 +49857... 8/20/2007 8 -102 COMMUNI'T'Y DEVELOPMENT CODE Floor area ratio (FAR) means a measurement )f the intensity of building development on a site. k floor area ratio is the relationshipbetween the gross floor area on a site and the gross land area. the FAR is calculated by adding together the ;Toss floor area of all buildings .on the site and dividing by the gross are Florida Statutes means the general law of Florida -and any, amendments thereto enacted by the Florida Legislature. Freestanding canopy means any ancillary, cantilevered, roof structure supported by vertical posts or columns and not ,affixed to any primary building. Frontage, building means the facade which is the principle means of customer access. Frontage, property means the length of the property line for a parcel which runs parallel to and along a road right -of -way or street exclusive of alleyways. Funeral home means an establishment with facilities for the preparation of the dead for burial, not involving cremation, for viewing of the de- ceased and for funerals. Garage, yard or estate sale means a sale oper- ated at a residence primarily for the sale of used household goods. Governmental use means a building, . use, or structure owned or occupied by a federal, state, or local government agency and serving as an agency office, police station, fire station, library, post office, or similar facility, but not including a vehicle storage yard, jail, sanitary landfill, solid waste transfer or disposal facility, wastewater treatment facility, hazardous waste treatment or storage facility, food irradiation facility, educa- tional or health institution, university, military facility, residential c' are home, housing for per- sons who .are participating in work release pro- grams or who have previously served' and com- pleted terms of imprisonment for violations of criminal laws, or other type of public facility. Grade, existing means the natural earth sur- face, or the earth surface altered for drainage or other engineering purposes determined necessary by the city engineer. ' Graffiti means one or more letters, symbols, or other markings painted, drawn or otherwise ap- plied to a wall,• post, column, or other building or structure; or to a tree, or other exterior surface, publicly or privately owned, not including signs or murals. Gross floor area means the total interior floor area of a building measured at the inside face of the exterior walls, but excluding parking garages, carports, stairwells and elevator shafts. Gross leasable floor area means the total floor area designed for tenant occupancy. Ground level means the lower or finished grade of a parcel of land exclusive of any filling, berm - ing, mounding or excavating solely for the pur- pose of locating a sign. Ground level on marina docks or floating structures shall be the finish grade of the landward portion of the adjoining parcel. Grubbing means the removal of any type of rooted vegetation from land by digging, raking, dragging or otherwise disturbing the roots of such vegetation and the soil which such roots are located. Supp. No. 11 CT)8:14 i 14 Y_ i' 40 1 tol N,,5- o i� 0 5 � 16 "OAK 9 "PALM Q 9 "PALM 0\9QPALM �P � °r 0 F A c�4 rA� 12 "PINE O 0 10 "PINE O 15 "PINE t ELEVATION= 3.26 VERIFY W( EXIST. GRADE Q 18 "PALM Q 10 "PALM 14 "PALM o 10 "PALM IC TERMITE INFORMATION R320.1 TERMITE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDEDBY REGISTERED TERMITICIDES, INCLUDING SOIL APPLIED PESTICIDES, BAITING SYSTEMS, AND PESTICIDES APPLIED TO WOOD, OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF TERMITE PROTECTION LABELED FOR USE AS A PREVENTATIVE TREATMENT TO NEW CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 202, REGISTERED TERMITICIDE). UPON COMPLETIONS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE TERMITE PROTECTIVE TREATMENT, A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE SHALL BE ISSUED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT BY THE LICENSED PEST CONTROL COMPANY THAT CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING STATEMNT: "THE BUILDING HAS RECEIVED A COMPLETE TREATMENT FOR THE PREVENTION OF SUBTERRANEEAN TERMITES. TREATMENT IS ACCORDANCE WITH RULES AND LAWS ESTABLISED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES." 8320.1.1 IF SOIL TREATMENT IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE PREVENTION, THE INTIAL CHEMICAL SOIL TREATMENT INSIDE THE FOUNDATION PERIMETER SHALL BE DONE AFTER ALL EXCAVATION, BACKFILLING AND COMPACTION IS COMPLETE. R320.1.2 IF SOIL TREATMENT IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE PREVENTION, SOIL AREA DISTURBEDAFTER INTIAL CHEMICAL SOIL TREATMENT SHALL BE RETREATED WITH A CHEMICAL SOIL TREATMENT, INCLUDING SPACES BOXED OR OR FORMED. 8320.1.3 IF SOIL TREATMENT IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE PREVENTION, SPACE IN CONCRETE FLOORS B OXED OUT OR FORMED FOR THE SUBSEQUENT INSTALLATION OF PLUMBING TRAPS, DRAINS OR ANY OTHER PURPOSE SHALL BE CREATED BY USING PLASTIC OR METAL PERMANENTLY PLACED FORMS OF SUFFICIENT DEPTH TO ELIMINATE ANY PLANNED SOIL DISTURBANCE AFTER INTIAL CHEMICAL SOIL TREATMENT, 8320.1.4 IF SOIL TREATMENT IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE PREVENTION, CHEMICALLY TREATED SOIL SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH A MINIMUM 6 MIL VAPOR RETARDER TO PROTECT AGAINST RAINFALL DILUTION. IF RAINFAL OCCURS BEFORE VAPOR RETARDER PLACEMENT, RETREATMENT IS REQUIRED. ANY WORK, INCLUDING PLACEMENT OF REINFORCING STEEL, DONE AFTER CHEMICAL TREATMENT UNTIL THE CONCRETE FLOOR IS POURED, SHALL BE DONE IN SUCH MANNER AS TO AVOID PENETRATING OR DISTURBING TREATED SOIL. R320.1.5 IF SOIL TREATMENT IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE PREVENTION, CONCRETE OVERPOUR OR MORTAR ACCMULATED ALONG THE EXTERIOR FOUNDATION PERIMETER SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO EXTERIOR CHEMICAL SOIL TREATMENT, TO ENHANCE VERTICAL PENETRATION OF CHEMICALS. R320.1.6 IF SOIL TREATMENT IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE PERVENTION, CHEMICAL SOIL TREATMENTS SHALL ALSO BE APPLIED UNDER ALL EXTERIOR CONCRETE OR GRADE WITHIN 1 FOOT (305 MM) OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE SIDEWALLS. ALSO, A VERTICAL CHEMICAL BARRIER SHALL BE APPLIED PROMPTLY AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, INCLUDING INTIAL LANDSCAPING AND I RRIGATION /SPRINKLER INSTALLATION. ANY SOIL DISTURBED AFTER THE CHEMICAL VERTICAL BARRIER IS APPLIED SHALL BE PROMPLY RETREATED. R320.1.7 IF A REGISTERED TERMITICIDE FORMULATED AND REGISTERED AS A BAIT SYSTEM IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE PREVENTION, SECTIONS 8320.1.1 THROUGH 8320.1.6 DO NOT APPLY: HOWEVER, A SIGNED CONTRCT ASSURING THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING OF THE BAITING SYSTEM FOR A MINUMUM OF FIVE YEARS FROM THE ISSUE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL RIOR TO THE POURING OF THE SLAB, AND THE SYSTEM MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING APPROVAL. IF THE BAITING SYSTEM DIRECTIONS FOR USE REQUIRE A MONITORING PHASE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE PESTICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENT, THE INSTALLATION OF THE MONITORING PHASE COMPONETS SHALL BE DEEMED TO CONSTITUTE INSTALLATION OF THE SYSTEM. R320.1.8 IF A REGISTERED TERMITICIDE FORMULATED AND REGISTERED AS A WOOD TREATMENT IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE PREVENTION. SECTION 8320.1.1 THROUGH 8320.1.6 DO NOT APPLY. APPLICATION OF THE WOOD TREATMENT TERMITICIDE SHALL BE AS REQUIRED BY LABEL DIRECTIONS FOR USE, AND MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING APPROVAL. R320.2 PENETRATION. PROTECTIVE SLEEVES AROUND METALIC PIPING PENETRATING CONCRETE SLAB -ON -GRADE FLOORS SHALL NOT BE OF CELLULOSE- CONTAING MATERIAL AND, IF SOILD TREATMENT IS USED FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE PROTECTION, SHALL RECEIVE APPLICATION OF A TERNITICIDE IN ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN SLEEVE AND PIPE. R320.3 CLEANING. CELLS AND CAVITIES IN MASONRY UNITS AND AIR GAPS BETWEEN BRICK, STONE OR MASONRY VENEERS AND THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE OF ALL NONPRESERVATIVE TREATED OR NONNATURALLY DURABLE WOOD, OR OTHER CELLULOSE - CONTAINING MATERIAL PRIOR TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT. EXCEPTION. INORGANIC MATERIAL MANUFACTURED FOR CLOSING CELLS IN FOUNDATION CONCRETE MASONRYUNIT CONSTRUCTION OR CLEAN EARTH FILL PLACED IN CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT VOIDS BELOW SLAB LEVEL BEFORE TERMITE TREATMENT IS PERFORMED. R320.4 CONCRETE BEARING LEDGE. BRICK, STONE OR OTHER VENEER SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY A CONCRETE BEARING LEDGE AT LEAST EQUAL TO THE TOTAL THICKNESS OF THE BRICK, STONE OR OTHER VENEER, WHICH IS POURED INTEGRALLY WITH y ? THE CONRETE FOUNDATION. NO SUPPLEMENTAL CONCRETE FOUNDATION POURS WICH WILL CREATE A HIDDEN}COLDJOINT = = SHALE'BE_USED WITHOUT SUPPL:EMENI AL TREATMENT iN;I HE FQtNDAf.ION "UNLESS THERE IS AM1I APPROVED F?NYSICAL BARRIER. AN APPROVED PHYSICAL BARRIER SHALL ALSO BE INSTALLED FORM BELOW THEWALL SILL PLATE OR FIRST BLOCK COURSE HORIZONTALLY TO EMBED IN A MORTAR JOINT. IF MASONRY VENEER ETENDS BELOW GRADE, A TERMITE PROTECTIVE TREATMENT MUST BE APPLIED TO THE CAVITY CREATED BETWEEN THE VENEER AND THE FOUNDATION, IN LIEU OF A PHYSICAL BARRIER. EXCEPTION: VENEER SUPPRTED BY A SHELF ANGLE OR LINTEL SECURED TO THE FOUNDATION SIDEWALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 530 /ASCE 5/TMS 402, PROVIDE AT LEAST A6-INCH (152 MM),CLEAR I NSPECTION SPACE OF THE FOUNDATION SIDEWALL EXTERIOR EXIST BETWEEN THE VENEER AND THE TOP OF ANY SOIL, SOD, MUCLCH OR OTHER ORGANIC LANDSCAPING COMPONET, DECK, APRON, PORCH,WALK OR ANY OTHER WORK IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO OR ADJOINING THE STRUCTURE. 8320.5 PRESSURE PRESERVATIVELY TREATED AND NATURALLY RESISTANT WOOD. HEARTWOOD OF REDWOOD AND EASTERN RED CEDAR SHALL BE CONSIDERED TERMITE RESISTANT. PRESSURE PRESERVATIVELY TREATED WOOD AND NATURALLY TERMITE- RESISTANT WOOD SHALL NOT BE USED AS A PHYSICAL BARRIER UNLESS A BARRIER CAN BE INSPECTED FOR ANY TERMITE SHELTER TUBES AROUND THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE EDGES ND JOINTS OF A BARRIER. 8320.5.1 FIELD TREATMENT. FIELD CUT ENDS. NOTCHES AND DRILLED HOLES OF PRESSURE PRESERVATIVELY TREATED WOOD SHALL BE RETREATED IN THE FIELD IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWPA M4. 8320.6 FOAM PLASTIC PROTECTION. EXTRUDED AND EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE, POLYISOCYANURATE AND OTHER FOAM PLASTICS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED ON THE EXTERIOR FACE OR UNDER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALLS OR SLAB FOUNDATIONS LOCATED BELOW GRADE. THE CLEARANCE BETWEEN FOAM PLASTICS INSTALLED ABOVE GRADE AND EXPOSED EARTH SHALL BE AT LEAST 6 -INCHES (152 MM). EXCEPTIONS: 1. BUILDINGS WHERE THE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS OF WALLS, FLOORS, CEILINGS AND ROOFS ARE ENTIRELY OF NON- COMBUSTABLE MATERIALS OR PRESURE PRESERVATIVELY TREATED WOOD. 2. WHEN IN ADDITON TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 8320.1, AN APPROVED METHOD OF PROTECTING THE FOAM PLASTIC AND STRUCTURE FROM SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE DAMAGE IS PROVIDED. 3. ON THE INTERIOR SIDE OF BASEMENT WALLS. R320.7 PROTECTION AGAINST DECAY AND TERMITES. CONDENSATE LINES AND ROOF DOWNSPOUTS SHALL DISCHARGE AT LEAST 1 FOOT (305 MM) AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE SIDEWALL, WHETHER BY UNDERGROUND PIPING, TAIL EXTENSIONS OR SPLASH BLOCKS. GUTTERS WITH DOWNSPOUTS ARE REQUIRED ON ALL BUILDINGS WITH EAVES LESS THAN 6- INCHES (152 MM) HORIZONTAL PROJECTION EXCEPT FOR GABLE END RAKES OR ON A ROOF ABOVE ANOTHER ROOF. 8320.8 PREPARATION OF BUILDING SITE AND REMOVAL OF DEBRIS. 8320.8.1 ALL BUILDING SITES SHALL BE GRADED TO PROVIDE DRAINAGE FROM ALL PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING NOT OCCUPIED BY BASEMENTS. 8320.8.2 THE FOUNDATION AND THE AREA ENCOMPASSED WITHIN 1 FOOT (305 MM) THEREIN SHALL HAVE ALL VEGITATION, STUMPS, DEAD ROOTS, CARDBOARD, TRASH AND FOREIGN MATERIAL REMOVED AND THE FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF VEGETATION AND FOREIGN MATERIAL. THE FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO ASSURE ADEQUATE SUPPORT OF THE FOUNDATION. 8320.8.3 AFTER ALL WORK IS COMPLETED, LOOSE WOOD AND DEBRIS SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM UNDER THE BUILDING AND WITHIN 1 FOOT (305 MM) THEREOF. ALL WOOD FORMS AND SUPPORTS SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED. THIS INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: WOODEN GRADE STAKES, FORMS, CONTRACTION SPACERS, TUB TRAP BOXES, PLUMBING SUPPORTS, BRACING, SHORING, FORMS OR OTHER CELLULOSE - CONTAINING MATERIAL PLACED IN AN LOCATION WHERE SUCH MATERIALS ARE NOT CLEARLY VISIBLE AND REDILY REMOVABLE PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE WORK. WOOD SHALL NOT BE STORED IN CONTACT WITH THE GROUND UNDER ANY BUILDING. bo 40' -8" 3' -0" 37' -8" 3' -2" 6' -10" 3' -2" E1 ba N Ell I'm N 3' -0" 3' -0" WINW SIZES SHOWN ARE FOR "Nu­AlR7 . - �s ROLLER, ALL MASONRY OPENINGS. MATCH EXISTING WINDOWS. i FLOOR PLAN LA NOTES a BASE CABINETS SELECTED BY OWNER, PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED BLOCKING 7 ROOF SLOPE = 5/12, MATCH EXISTING, VERIFY �rCVCi�lrfusClvlArrLlUAIIUN b I.. to J co ry OWQ - `� i ei c> `!' t M o _Jw co C9 = b c� LL N o N t cV 0 M O O —1L N 12 ba N Ell I'm N 3' -0" 3' -0" WINW SIZES SHOWN ARE FOR "Nu­AlR7 . - �s ROLLER, ALL MASONRY OPENINGS. MATCH EXISTING WINDOWS. i FLOOR PLAN LA NOTES a BASE CABINETS SELECTED BY OWNER, PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED BLOCKING 7 ROOF SLOPE = 5/12, MATCH EXISTING, VERIFY �rCVCi�lrfusClvlArrLlUAIIUN 12 VERIFY i PROJECT TITLE: A 3.� 3/1611 = 1 ` -0`'