The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2007-02001FLD2007-02001 1040 MYRTLE AVE N PSALMS Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 -5; 2 -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: 7 -0 RECEIVED BY (staff initials DATE RECEIVED: -- * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ORIGINAL. RECHVEC PLANNING DEEAWMENT FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 10/25/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) I APPLICANT NAME: E N I q t ([ VKh C I ( PSX V —M U MAILING ADDRESS: 1 6 1) t n6 PA Wff S PP 77 PHONE NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER( *): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: AV[] 94 .+ fnrro/ 4 aftc-)c RECEIVED MAK .1 UlTy OF CLEAMATER r �0 041 eF D' S 7— 72 FAX NUMBER: E -MAIL ADDRESS: Is. FKtUP05ED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: P.,C)AUK4 PROJECT VALUATION: STREET ADDRESS I 0 q1? PARCEL NUMBER(S): 1(2 7t) PARCEL SIZE (acres): PARCEL SIZE (square feet): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: j�L `N1�ifi j3' . 3 i f r NS �ESs E 0 FT_ F D P K L) its110' PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: I R F- S I b RVVI A L Ll W � Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square Footage of non - residential use and all L a *equested code deviations; e.g. eduction in required number, of &9 is i )arking spaces, specific use, etc.) - R�wa- UA& p 6.,9 So. 53 i p �� 0 I_ F U 7- t�) 120,--, Q FT, S: \Planning Department\Application Forms \development review \2006 Forms \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 1 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA— Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, ' purpose, intent and basic planning o e Ives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district PkIP41ee -r, 3. 4. The develo ment or redevelopment as well as with the general pEderiy development and 'm ro e ent of surround' in properties. . PAP 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will. not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor, d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. rS � to Apse_ W 6 L �°P..�$gV"tA � k WOu� Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement -of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; ORIGINAL c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of a d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a su staPial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; MAR 15 2007 ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, cllin,�gY,sd awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; 1NNNING DEPARTME)rn ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; El Building OF GlEARVV�4iE� Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate dis nces betty en buildings. SAPlanning Department\Application Forms \development review\2006 Forms \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 3 of 8 { f- PLANNING ();:pA wmwim E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as•to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stonnwater plan as noted above is included cAXE Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED. SURVEY (including legal description of property) — One original and 14 copies; 13 TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) — please design around the existing trees; HIA 12�A ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; N /p 1 LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; Fd PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards.are approved; E4 ,Q7TF *G, #1 ❑ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ORIGINAL ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; RECEIVED MAR 15 2007 ORIGINAL PFcFIVFr PLANNING DEPARTMENT C1IYOECLEARWATER ?,LA NiVil\ G DEPAPTlilIEW S:1Planning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment review\2006 FormslComprehensive lnfill I5ATffCQt(111?®iBtU;A16ti Page 4 of 8 r! i I G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) Ll SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; All open space areas; ORIGINAL Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; RECEIVED Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. MAR 15 2007 Streets and drives (dimensioned); O SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Land area in square feet and acres; EXISTING a �(� REQUIRED �� vE�� PROPOSED � Q �/� Number of EXISTING dwelling units; j Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; 1 I Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; D Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable r -7 !`T 13, 1 FZ— _t T, 7— surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. a m REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); u FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; ORIGINAL ORIGI NAI. Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; RECEIVED Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); MAR 15 2007 Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); PLANNING DEPARTMENT Structural overhangs; CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING LANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARVrATER S: \Planning Department\Application Forms \development review \2006 Forms \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 5 of 8 i I H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36 "): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS — with the following information; All sides of all buildings; ORIGINAL Dimensioned; RECEIVED Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; MAR 15 2007 Sight visibility triangles; PLANNING DEPARTIWEN ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS.— same as above to scale on 8'/: X 11. CI7Y OF CLEARWATER J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Sectiom3- 1808)_ ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area,. height, etc.),. indicate. whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, .size, height, freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) colors, materials and drawing; � Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable. (separate application and fee required).E ORiGiF3a�_ 11 Reduced signage proposal (8 '/ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. r, 'L,ANNING DEPARIMILENT: ';ITY OF CLEARWATE S:1Planning Department Application Formsldevelopment review12006 FormslComprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 6 of 8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ICI Aa,. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) PLANNING DEPARTMEw "t "! CITY OF CLEARWATER Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: � iA;dPtf`t` G Dl:PAR10061T s-)F C-1_FAR`NATFR • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ., • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (RE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a ' Scoping Meeting' held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Refer`to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. 0 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. f Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE `I LOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: ProvideFre f1ow.Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine it any upgraded are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance. with the 2004 Florida.Flre Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. 0 Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. �J Ere Flow Calculations/Water Study is not require lG_: CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMEN OR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS . BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fin: Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made In this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authoriz`e'City representatives to visit and photograp4 the-Oi�perty described in this application. +fT Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn t2jand subscribed before me this 3['5T–day of —,A.D.209 to me and/or by S , who is na known has produced as ' tification. Goodwin ota blic, 411F . My Commission DD257911 My co rbi ission expires: er Expires October 25, 2007 S:1Planning Department\Application Formsldevelopment review12006 FormslComprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 7 of 8 SECTION3- -913.A ---- - - - - -- DETACHED. DWELLING ,EXISTING AND APPROXIMATLY 80 OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE SIMILAR,AS FAR AS NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS ARE NON EXISTTENT OR FORTH COMING ORIGINAL RECEIVED Page 1 MAR 15 2007 PINING DEPAR110EW CITY OF CLEARWATFp #6 SIDING IS TO BE REMOVED AND RELACED BY DESIGN TEAM IN ARCHITECTUAL STUCCO-------- #7 - - - - -- -FIRE MARSHALL HAS CHANGED MIND ON PAVED ACCESS ROAD ALL ACCESS IS ON N MYRTLE AVENUE---- - - - - #8 - - -- SOUTHEAST CORNER AND DOOR HAS BEEN REMOVED AIR CONDITIONER UNIT HAS BEEN MOVED TO REAR ,FRONT ACCESS GATE IS 441NCHES WIDE AND SWINGS IN WITH STEPS NOT TO EXCEED 25 INCHES IN RISE AND RUN---- #9----- - - - -AS REQUESTED PARKING HAS BEEN SHIFTED TO THE NORTHSIDE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE,LEAVING GRASSY AREA ON SOUTH SIDE,HANDICAPPED SPACE HAS BEEN REMOVED PER STAFF RECCOMMENDATION AND REPLACED BY WIDER PARKING SITE---- #11-- - - - - -- -WALK UP STEPS REMOVED A.C. MOVED #12 - - - -- PIN ELLAS COUNTY PAAAAAAAAUL COOZIE HAS SUBMITTED REVISED PLAN AND UP DATED BY NEEDHAM AND DIRECTOR SHELLY ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 15 2007 Page 1 PLANNING ©EPARTtvjErvT CITY OF CLEARW V g SECTION 2- 704.C.2 -------- THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A DETACHED DWELLING IN THIS C CISTRICT IS CONSISTENT WITH 80% OF DETACHED DWELLINGS ALREADY HERE IN C DISTRICT. THE HOME OFFICE IS AN ALREADY APPROVED USE FOR THIS UNIT, THE ONLY NEGATIVE IMPACT IS A DENIED REQUEST WOULD REQUIRE A BOARDED UP BUILDING,THE CITY REQUIRES APPROVAL FOR IMPROVEMENT.THIS AREA HAS HAD 5 DIFFERENT ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS , IT STARTED AS GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITH HOMES AND GROCERIES,THEN IT WAS CHANGED TO RESIDENTIAL FOR MORE HOMES ,ALL BUSINESSES WERE REMOVED , THEN IT WAS COMMERCIAL INFILL,WITH RESTRICTIONS AND NO BUSINESS GAINED,THEN IT WAS CHANGED TO COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ,MOSTLY OLDER HOMES LED TO DRUG DEALERS AND RENTALS. THEN CAME COMMERCIAL WHICH ELIMINATEL ALL 15 AUTO REPAIR FACILITIES IN AREA,NO AUTO RELATED BUSINESS WAS ALLOWED. NO NEW BUILDINGS IN THE AREA IN LAST 10 YEARS,EXCEPT BY APPLICANT ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 15 2007 PLANNING DEPAklMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 1 SECTION 2- 704.C.3 - - - - -- ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS SAME USE AND CLASSIFICATION AS APPLICANT WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY REVIEW BOARD ALSO IS APPROVING THIS APPLICANT ,-- -SOUTH LOT IS AN DIRT PILE AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT ,SEWER PIPE STORAGE, AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT REPAIR AREA HAS BEEN THERE FOR Z YEARS, AND WILL BE THERE FOR 3 MORE YEARS , ANY DEVELOPMENT IS FAR DOWN THE ROAD, AS PER THE SOUTH PROPERTY ORIGINAL Pagel RECENED MAR 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER SECTION2- 704.C.5 --- - - - - -- -THIS APPLICATION WILL CONTRIBUTE TO SUPPLY THE AREA WITH AN AFFORDABLE HOUSE WITH EMPLOYMENT NO DRIVING TIME,AVAILABLE ACCESS AT ALL TIMES ,MORE PRODUCTIVITY ,SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS INCREASED IN VALUE FROM 30,000 TO 2009000 DOLLARS WITH IMPROVEMENTS BY ARCHITECT, WHO WILL.00CUPY THE HOME OFFICE,OTHER SIMILAR DEVELOPMENT IS NON EXISTENT,AREA HAS NO NEW BUILDINGS IN THE LAST 10 YEARS, AN ARCHITECTS HOME OFFICE IS AN EXCELLENT USE AND CONTRIBUTOR FOR THIS PROPERTY OR{GINAL RECENE® Page 1 ;AR 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEp SECTION2- 704.0.6 ------- THIS DOES NOT IMPEDE FUTURE OR SURRONDING PROPERTIES IN ANY WAY. -- DESIGN GUIDELINES ARE ACCENTUATED BY DESIGN WORK DONE AS PICTURED FOR INTERIOR,EXTERIOR WILL HAVE A DECORATIVE WALKWAY, ALL STUCCO WORK WILL BE UNDER DIRECTION OF LEADING STUCCO DESIGN TEAM WITH DISTINCTIVE RAILINGS AND WINDOW DESIGNS ON EXTERIOR, THE DISTINCTIVE ROOF FOR WILL BE COMPLIMENTED WITH LANDSCAPING CHANGES TO COMPLETE ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page l CITY OF CLEARWATER RESPONCE GENERAL ENGINEERING- COUNTY OFFICIALS WINSTON NEEDHAM TRAFFIC ENGINEER,SANDY KELLY DIRECTOR, N.E. RAYBURN PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR, PAUL COOZIE BUREAU DIRECTOR. THEY HAVE ALL REVIEWED PLANS FOR 2 PARKING SPACES AND APPROVED BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS ON 1040 N MYRTLE AVE. ALSO NO ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PINELLAS COUNTY TRAIL ARE REQUIRED BY PINELLAS COUNTY. ADDING TWO ADDITIONAL LANES OF ROADWAY WILL RESULT IN 10 LANES OF PAVED ROADWAY WITHIN 100 FEET,THE COUNTY OFFICIALS WERE DISPLEASED BY CLEARWATERS REQUEST FOR PAVING MORE OF THE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY.-ALL GARBAGE TRUCK ,RECYCLE TRUCK,MAIL DELIVERY TRUCK, AND EMERGENCY SERVICES HAS BEEN MOVED TO N MYRTLE AVENUE . THE ONLY USE WILL BE 4.3 VEHICLE USES PER DAY BY CITY STANDARDS .ACCESS IS GAINED ON THE EAST SIDE FOR FIRE ,EMERGENCY BY INSTALLING A 44 INCH WIDE SWING IN GATE WITH STEPS NOT TO EXCEED 25 INCHES IN TOTAL OF RISE AND RUN TO FLAT LEVEL GROUND WITH NO DROP OFF PER FIRE MARSHALL. 5 FOOT SIDE SETBACK WILL BE REDUCED ON NORTH ONLY ,SOUTH PARKING HAS BEEN MOVED AWAY FROM LOT LINE MGINAI. RECEIVED Page 1 MAR 15 2007 NIn DEPAiMWIT C OF CLMR AT;_� FIRE - - -- A 44 INCH INWARD SWING GATE WITH STEPS TO FLAT LEVEL GROUND FOR A FIREFIGHTER CARRYING 80 POUND APPARATUS, WITH STEP NOT TO EXCEED 25 INCHES IN RISE AND RUN. N MYRTLE AVENUE IS PRIMARY ACCESS FOR ALL NEEDS. NO REAR ACCESS IS NEEDED OR DESIRED ALSO PAVED ROADWAY REQUEST HAS BEEN REMOVED BY THE FIRE MARSHALL. MGM RECIP41) Page 1 MAR 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER TRAFFIC _e - -_e ® HAND ICAPPED PARKING IS NOT DESIGNATED BUT ALLOWANCES HAVE BEEN MADE IN PARKING AREA FOR POSSIBLE FAMILY USE.HOME OFFICE IS NOT REQUESTING FOR USE BY CUSTOMERS,NOT PLANNED OR EXPECTED ,MOSTLY INTERNET BUSINESS. IMPACT FEE WILL BE PAID PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. o"' t NE® MAR 15 2001 Page �NING ®EPApTi4ENr OF CLSOWATER W A. SAUTE FMCS - GWA MW ROBERT B. STEVIART - VICE CFMlriliiler CALVIN D. HARRIS KAREN MIIMJJAMS SEEL 'BARBARA SHEEN TODD December 21.1999 PI LLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA''` OEPARTYENT of PUBLIC WORK: "0 COURT STREET CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33756 PHONE: (M 464 -3251 Mr. Tom SehllIldrst 1000 N Myrtle Avenue` Ckiewatm. FL 33755 96 Z� Please be advised t W vre have no objection tame - of the Plne�as rigtlt -af- "Y a" the east side of the Try from Cedar Street nortlt tbo #Waddit 9 - N.E Public Works EnginewbV SLVWA or Pubfc Works Permleft Services �It1e��.S Casty PUBLIC WORKS Trafflc Engineering k..•�.a.r+•`J" �� ._ `�°�°`�•.• Winton E. Needham sehlhoM - trall.tr doc Division Manager A f 22211 U. S. Highway 19, Bldg. 10 J / fI Clearwater, Florida 33765 Phone: (727) 464-8816 _y FAX: (727) 464,8803 wneedham @pinellascountyorg l `,l Website: www.pinellascounty.org /tea; DI [oo i!G a�TATt�l1�l �'�rylr�i �% Irv_ /mac PUBLIC WORKS Construction Sandy Kelley, Diredor Construction Management Regulatory Services & Udiity Coordination 22211 U. S. Hwy., 19 N., Bldg. #16 Clearwater, Florida 33765 - 2328 Phone: (727) 464.8887 FAX: (727) -464 -8888 skelley®co.pinellasAus Website: www.pinellascounty.org /N g'.F��. /ya ��1 � 02✓ o Z %i'kaiL f- — oP —wit Arm •Oinnlloe iw e.. C......1 Anwwra..wla.. C...wiw.... A .0 ru- -11..► t-- - n. . 0-....&r_ a .._ . G ORIGINAL RECEIVED - - k A 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTM64t.•__ CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 vrot, n "Ov #rlb I Ammoo dim. 4,4. MTft aw Ft�e k�cG35 Tw P W, am 7 a. O mo M m m 'm Z 7 a. gpI E , TV IF 1 l a d i �RIGl�1lAl. '�ECE�D t��R 15 2007 �L�lftli�S DENi4itii�Ery CIN Q� C1.EARWATFr r� • � r ti � F - `t �1 1 { � ss= ;r k - a i �RIGl�1lAl. '�ECE�D t��R 15 2007 �L�lftli�S DENi4itii�Ery CIN Q� C1.EARWATFr r� • � r ti 'Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 - 562 -4567 Fax: 727 -& -4865 ❑ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ❑ SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ❑ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: r IbQ (, - I RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 01 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 10/25/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT— A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND ANDAGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: E N t T( L(4 UR PS)q` V ` t •C9J MAILING ADDRESS: loot WWHAWK STWETZ PHONE NUMBER: Plqi %iJ AA CELL NUMBER: -. z, . )VA PROPERTY OWNER(): P �' n rtt- i�vV List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: ( H 0 W( lq S M � r 6 � � L 1Y 7- �Q S 7- MAILING ADDRESS: T A M M ' PHONE NUMBER: 51 7 41' FAX NUMBER: b 01 CELL NUMBER: E -MAIL ADDRESS: `r' AM,W�_6 MOP B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4- 202.A) PROJECT NAME: pl I • L IK Z PROJECT VALUATION: $ 6�9 STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non - residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) M Yk?'Lt" Avr NV PARCEL SIZE (square feet): r q L. 5 3 f FT iD r N.- ;35 E ?0 FT F 0 k K 0 r qY11 RAYD ii 1/*1 1 q P A C 1 4 A pra 1205Q PT. u S: \Planning Department\Application Forms \development review \2006 Forms \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4- 202.A.5) ❑ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3- 913.A) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be�infharmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. V4� k� � 1`L G�i C�Vf7 �IW Y GVY ``Tr11 !J Aeul!o t tt s eAl,Q A t�,A hittz Ney Cat PROK A 6 Q Vti T, #� r -OF 5 A*9- KLO Ai DALY 1 'POPUTY is etV 00* s (b r, . 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. T'�l6 1 S UL C&4- JgVJU.LV - ' lD AJXV CV Os! Ne 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 1xcsT�v�- use 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. TR e, c I rr B E e- tmwA-r9t x/46 P-Kr*kL/ AORPeA x*d. _8�ocw P"46TCAq- 04 MY TAHP/t 16 OA 00 A Cea%S lit AtAPPOMb 03? e-1 ?7 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. V C Cliff �46T c gA "mss RVILAIW 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. rt,t6 A t-L aqkgtg_ M<' et_e RECEIVED .. • ., , . ; FEB ti 2007 �— PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER S: \Planning Department\Application Forms \development review \2006 Forms \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ❑ Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA— Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. CAA, n � % MAI,() � A � W 1 r -�f �G� l_y�,�,. MIS'- Q� �!�!� ly � � C' ANA 5,7 Y 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning o ec ives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district T1111.1 1 s�x�►��s �1°�`' E�l►�I,c✓lo�r�� C- �°ACzS 3. The development or redevelo ment will of impede the no al and o derly development and 'm ro a ent of surroundin properties. MN. 4. Adjoihing properties will not suffer substantial detrime a a r It f the p o osed development. 14 _ S 6 tt MG 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent .land uses, will. not substantially alter the essential. use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other.similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a worJcin waterfront use. �li't.�- 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on. demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: . a. The proposed development will not impede the normal-and orderly development and improvemenfof the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; s b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e.. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, landscape dCesign and appIt o to di n�s betW�en buildings. RV Lk�ukrr G v ORIGI ,4t S: \Planning Department\Application Forms \development review \2006 Forms \Comprehensive Infll Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 3 of 8 FEB 012007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT rlN OF C1 ;:ap1A16TCP lCe... E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4- 202.A.21) ❑ A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. V I If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as,to why the site is exempt. ❑ At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ❑ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ❑ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ❑ Alf adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to. demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ❑ Proposed stormwater detention /retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ❑ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ❑ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ❑ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included .�C Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562 -4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4- 202.A) ❑ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ❑ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; N/A 12�A ❑ TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist ", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; N /�/h i/ LOCATION MAIP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; SEA ,gT%JgC-H E ID • GRADING PLAN, as applicable; • PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ❑ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; RECEIVED FEB Ol 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT S: \Planning Department\Application Forms \development review\2006 Forms \Comprehensive Infill GTOLWAISP Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A) O SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; ''. Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights -of -way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3- 201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm -water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. 13 SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written /tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. O REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11); Q�4k G I 191P O 9 REQUIRED a, vll� .i PROPOSED �Oh/G I rT 3,7 7- a,7 FT 0 O FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One -foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; ORIGINAL Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; RECEIVED Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); FEB 012007 Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); PLANNING DEPARTMENT Structural overhangs; CITY OF CLEARWATER S: \Planning Department\Application Forms \development review \2006 Forms \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 1102.A) ❑ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36 "): All existing and proposed structures; ,7 Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; ! Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on -site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and /or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ❑ REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); ❑ COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4- 202.A.23) ❑ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS —with the following information; _ All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; ❑ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS — same as above to scale on 8% X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3- 1806) y ❑ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area,. height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ❑ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ❑ OR1GIIe1gL Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ORI IN ❑ Reduced signage proposal (8 '% X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. FEB -O 12007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER S: \Planning Department\Application Forms \development review \2006 Forms \Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 6 of 8 6CS _ T K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his /her designee or if the proposed development: ■ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. e& /� ,(Z,0 ■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. .1 5 Will affect a nearby roadway segment and /or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4 -801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. O Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. EI Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations /water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. �J J( Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not require CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT OR A/ FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: S e, C A a 4 IA, I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 to me and /or by , who is personally known has produced as identification. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Notary public, My commission expires: FEB Q 12007 PLANNING ��DEPARTMENT S: \Planning Department\Application Forms \development review \2006 Forms \Comprehensive Infill Pro) z0®�'IPT.Yf'dCTER Page 7 of 8 oki( NAL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4- 202.A.13 and 4- 801.C) Fr1 0 12007 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: PLANNING CD PART ER • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. 'Pe&6kil ■ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour andlor 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ■ 'Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a " Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Departments Development Review Manager or their designee (727- 562 -4750) Refer to Section 4-801. C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. 13 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post - development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. f! Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS /WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER.to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine I. any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and /or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. L3 Acknowledgement of fire flow calculationstwater study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not requir CAUTION — IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENTOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562 -4334. M. SIGNATURE: 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and a e City representatives to visit and DhotograDb t roperty described in this application. Signature of proper* -owner rfr representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS., Sworn to d subscribed before me this _, 16 day of .. A.D. 20 csl to me and/or by S -.who is n known has produced as ' tificat' Goodwin ota blic, • My Commission DD257911 My co ission expires: N d; Expires October 25, 2007 S: \Planning DepartmentWpplication Forms \development review\2006 Forms \Comprehensive infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 7 of 8 :J. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE ENTS . 1. Provide names of all .property owners on deed - PRINT full names: KAU( 2. That 1 a e are) the owner() and record title holder() of the following described propeCt ss r general location): r) WYk Gi� t, 1` trailways �s:ect -o �tormwat_ - 'plan is not required as adding only 2 pave spaces wit no driveway. This will be the only impervious area on entire property. The stormwaterwill be directed by slight slope to run to grassy area with a slight s on property. sec.io n plan, per Rick Albee no trees verified, andscape plan not required on detached dwellin . eec.tion j f (ES :gna a There LL no a 1 i cati on on this app Ica ion ection K Tra impact study ,per Scott Rice, This applica ion as t e minimun required 2 parking spaces, A traffic parking study is only required for 3 to 100 spaces. ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 012001 Page 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMISSIONERS c BOARD OF COUNTY SALLIE PARKS - CHAIRMAN ROBERT B. STEWART - vICE CHAIRMAN CALVIN D. HARRIS KAREN WILLIAMS SEEL BARBARA SHEEN TODD December 21, 1999 Mr. Tom Sehlhorst 1000 N Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 COMMISSIONERS PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK( 440 COURT STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE- (727) 464 -3251 Dear Mr. Sehlhorst Please be advised that we have no objection to the cc,ntinued of the Pinellas Trail right -o - way along the east side of the Trail from Cedar Street north to the'existing guardrail. Sincerely, N.E. "Ray" Rey um Public Works Engineering Supervisor Public Works Permitting Services seh1horst - traflAr.doc �`4' ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB Ol 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATFP ®BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Kenneth T. Welch - Chairman Ronnie E. Duncan - Vice Chairman Calvin D. Harris Susan Latvala John Morroni Karen Williams Seel Robert B. Stewart July 14, 2006 Mr. Thomas Sehlhorst 1000 North Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 Pinellas Count y CULTURE, EDUCATN AND LEISIOURE Paul A. Cozzie Bureau Director QA Dear Mr. Sehlhorst: Nod. ZZ, z 00 1 /.�0 /M-7 Please be advised we haveZo objection �o your site plans dated Jji a 22, 2006 and the associated parking spacesf fwo sAacss t� If you are in need of any additional information, please contact Kathy Swain, Parks and Recreation Operations Manager at 727 - 453 -3074. Si ce ely, Paul Cozzie Bureau Director ORIGINAL RECEIVE[ FEB 012007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PLEASE ADDRESS REPLY TO: PINELLAS COUNTY CULTURE, EDUCATION & LEISURE 631 Chestnut Street CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 -5336 PHONE (727) 464 -3347 FAX: (727) 464 -3891 Website: www.pinellascounty.org 0 REVALUE TD: 20,061 VALUE RECORD 17- Oct -2006 BJ 09 / 29 / 15 / 25542 / 005 / 0452 AREA #: 21 NEB: 7 SCD: NHX RESIDENTIAL PROP USE: 210 PET #: 0 2006 2005 Override: BY: 0 0 0 FUTURE LAND REPLACEMENT COST APPROACH New: 57,850 Depreciated: 31,820 Xfsb: 0 Land: 14,320 Total: 46,140 SALES COMP APPROACH (sales prior to 2006) USE 51,860 25,410 (1) CG 0 (2) 9,210 (3) 34,620 Total: 54,000 35,400 Total: JUST / MARKET VALUE Total: JUST / MARKET HISTORY 02: 20,900 C BRANCHES i wl-'2 01 t � 42,500 71 0 29,500 0.3: 21,900 C 04: 23,300 C (A) gen (B) bldg (C) xfs (D) det val (N) nal (S) sale (W) val comp (E) corct val (Z) menu ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 011001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 17 -Oct -2006 4:59:34 DM 2006 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING 09 / 29 / 15 / 25542 / 005 / 0452 CARD: 01 OF 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ========================== CURRENT Imp Type: 08 Spec Rate: .00 Lv Unt: 1 Adrs: 1040 N MYRTLE AVE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS Foundation PIERS 1 # Stories 1.0 Quality Floor Sys WOOD 3 Floor Fin CPT /VNY /SW 2 Year Blt Ext Wall FR /ALUM /VN 9 Int Finish DWALL /PLST 2 Eff _Age Roof Frame GABLE -HIP 1 Heating UNT /WL /FLR 1 Other Dep Roof Cover CMP SHNGL 3 Cooling NONE 0 Func Dep M/H type Fixtures -- - - - - -- 3 Econ Dep SAVE OUR HOME: CODE: NHX NOTES: NO HX, NO CAP SUBAREAS TOTAL EFF SQ FT: 1) BAS 1.00 732 5) .00 0 9) 2) .00 0 6) .00 0 10) 3) .00 0 7) .00 0 11) 4) .00 0 8) .00 0 12) AVERAGE 2 1,954 40 0 0 732 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 (A)2006 gen(B)2005 bldg(C)2006 xsfb (E)sale (S)SOH (N)nal (V)valol (Z)menu ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 01 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NAME.ADDRESS LEGAL RESIDENTIAL 17 -Oct -2006 09 / 29 / 15 / 25542 / 005 / 0452 Prop Addr: 1040 N1: SEHLHORST, TOM N2: AT: Al: 1040 N MYRTLE AVE A2: CI: CLEARWATER FL 33755 Country: Non -EVAC VA N MYRTLE AVE Use Codes: 210 01 Anx Dst: 05Tax Amt 2006 Dst: CW 685.50 Spec Dst: .00 06 If No Cap: 924.97 06 If No Exem: 924.97 Paid Date: 00000000 2006 Mill: 21.7640 Owner # 1 2 3 4 5 Sr Bk /Pg 15241 1638 05 Exem 06 Ten: MARRIED I SEP RESID 06 Exem 07 Ten: SINGLE *HX FILED 2007* 2006 Values 2006 Exems 2006 Pcts Just / Market: 42,500 HX: 0 Cap .000 WX: 0 Own %: .000 Assessed / Cap: 42,500 DX: 0 Use .000 TX 0 Tx %: .000 Taxable: 42,500 AX: 0 Inst %: .000 SR: 0 ELDRIDGE, J. J. BLK E, S 31FT OF N 157FT OF LOT 45 LESS E 30FT FOR RD R/W Escrow: Petition: 0 Tax Dlq: Tax Note: Exem Area: EW Appr Area: 21 X: 242,965 Y: 324,742 ORIGIML RECEIVED FEB Ol 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER AX: 0 TOTAL LAND: 14,322 BRANCHES (A)2005 gen (B)2006 bldg (C)2006 notes (E)sale (N)nal (V)valol (Z)menu ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 012001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 17 -Oct -2006 14:59:32 BY: GR CHG DA', -: 13- Feb -2006 DL 2006 RESIDENTIAL GENERAL 09 / 29 / 15 / 25542 / 005 / 0452 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ==================== CURRENT Field Insp: 12- Dec -2005 Field By: 21 Source: NOT AT HOME Prop Use: 210 Area: 21 Neigbd: 7 Total Units: 1 Census: 262.00 Seawall: NO Frontage: NONE View: NONE LAND LINES LAND SIZE FACTORS UNIT LAND LAND METHOD TYPE FRONT DEPTH FRONT DEPTH SITE OTHER VALUE UNITS 1) 01 31 66 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 2,046.00 S 2) 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3) 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4) 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5) 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 6) 0 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 AX: 0 TOTAL LAND: 14,322 BRANCHES (A)2005 gen (B)2006 bldg (C)2006 notes (E)sale (N)nal (V)valol (Z)menu ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 012001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 012007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER i r )' CERTIFIED TO: TOM `_ HORST / I L= 132.19' / R= 11404.19' A= 00'39'51" / C LEN= 132.19' BRG =N 17'36'50" E a0' 60' 20 t'L c f t 0 �o yh �O- �ll 7 C) �f S G CTV Como Tv Service wv — water Valve TELE Tel*M" Service GV + Cats ZIV- -FHA Fie H)drent Assembly ELEC Power Tronefarmer ELEV. >, Elevation a Orb 3�Q DFIP� �x 2Ab%/ 20,12 Project Bri: Set Bent 60d rail in SE qf/ Side of 2pe PowerPole AO to V 0 10v * N5 vO Finished Floor Elev: — nnl ` oI 1 J �I I � 1 i 30.00' . v 01 0 N � 'L��+byA �1q 1A0 2b�° 2 a( X t �{ X 1 EXISTING — £ METAL AND MASONRY �' 1� BUILDING ' �S 62.00' M 9 x j 9 1 1 2q� h 2� X Z 20b � I yb POND /SWALE B$�T�7 ,LAID, 20 a% q0 'b'� iiTLE SEARCH FOR EASEMENTS. MATTERS OF REOORD. BASIS OF z nnavvAw CTATED. NO i Z U PP — £ lei oz PP 1 S 89'59'08" E 62.00' M X ZA0 R 5 S WM ® 0.1' 93f 26 3' Z0h � B$�T�7 ,LAID, = ONE STORYD'1� WOODFRAME 2.1' Q I H6.9 RESIDENCE 31.00' (M) .2-3" #1 040 b 2b� � 1 �p� PEAK OF ROOF °= FINISHED FLOOR ELEV 31.08' 0 - - QSTING GROUND ?gi 33.4' 5/1r STEPS b LIB 0 PLSW47 @� ' » ' Sit q0 'b'� iiTLE SEARCH FOR EASEMENTS. MATTERS OF REOORD. BASIS OF z nnavvAw CTATED. NO i Z U PP /,-1 cn bi Q 101 x -x -x- yrx -x -x- Ci - X - x 8' CHAHUNK FENCE by 0?°j x 3 3 � � I V � ZbO�` I W� � I 2.1' Q I S 00'00100" E 31.00' (M) .2-3" b 2b� � 1 /,-1 cn bi Q 101 x -x -x- yrx -x -x- Ci - X - x 8' CHAHUNK FENCE by 0?°j x 3 3 � �/ � �$Ui�'V'lRl) wt/!f� 3 f ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 012007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY AE CLEARWATER WCnf ORIGINAL, RECEIVED FEB a 11007 PLMSINING DEPARTNIEW CITY OF CLEARWATER kfq g - Microsoft Inter Locate Results oi I Address Score 1 Of N MYRTLE AVE 75 E21 1000 S MYRTLE AVE 52 141, Scale: 1: 1, 420 Nlap: 243269.23 , 1324696.98 -- Image: 589, 385 ... . ............. - 10 Internet '_*Start],, ... ... ............ ETiclemark Advantage [Ste- I .. .. ....... - — ---------- - ---------- - - L,7LNInbox - Nlicrosoft outlook 8: 4 7 -.1 At W—C, earwater Zoning - Mi ... S�ptw 2/1/2007 •`I` Receipt #: 1200700000000000889 10:24:34AM p �= Date: 02/01/2007 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2007 -02001 04 Flexible Commercial 010 - 341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid CreditCard THOMAS M SEHLHORST R D ORIGINAL RECEIVE® FEB 01 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 001683 In Person Payment Total: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 1,205.00 $1,205.00 cReceipt.rpt Q� I t y 1 'OF.aae�a� PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 17, 2007 Mr. Thomas M. Sehlhorst 1050 N. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33755 1,Y Y OF LEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAX (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLD2007 -02001 (1040 N. Myrtle Avenue) Dear Mr. Sehlhorst: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4- 206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On April 17, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development approval for an existing detached dwelling within the Commercial (C) District on a parcel of land with a lot area of 2,070 square feet (0.048 acres) and a lot width of 31 feet, with an existing building height of 12 feet, an existing front (east) setback of 2.1 feet (to building), an existing front (west) setback of 30 feet (to building) and a proposed front (west) setback of zero feet (to pavement), an existing side (north) setback of 0.1 feet (to building) and a proposed side (north) setback of zero feet (to pavement), and an existing side (south) setback of 6.5 feet (to building) and a proposed side (south) setback of zero feet (to pavement) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Section 2 -704.0 of the.Community Development Code. The CDB DENIED the application based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.048 -acre subject property is located along the west side of North Myrtle Avenue between Metto and Jurgens Streets; 2. That the subject property is located within the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District; 4. That Detached Dwellings are not a permitted use within the Commercial (C) District; 5. That the most recent use of the subject property as a Detached Dwelling is a nonconforming use; and 6. That the existing single- family detached dwelling on the subject property has been cited as being an unsafe structure (UNS2006- 00050). Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per Section 2- 704 of the Community Development Code with regard to the proposed minimum setbacks to pavement; 2. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.2 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project); 3. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.3 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project); FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR f OHN DORAN,, COUNCILMEMBER JR JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER FALL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 (1040 N. Myrtle Avenue) Page 2 of 2 4. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.4 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project); 5. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.5 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project); 6. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.6 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project); 7. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3- 913.A.1 of the Community Development Code; 8. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3- 913.A.2 of the Community Development Code; and 9. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3- 913.A.5 of the Community Development Code. Please be advised that pursuant to Section 4- 202.G.1 of the Community Development Code, no application shall be accepted for nine months after the denial of a substantially similar application affecting the same property or any portion thereof as a Level Two (Flexible Development) application. An appeal of the Boards decision may be initiated by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting, as per Section 4 -502.B of the Community Development Code. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on May 1, 2007. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 5624539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft(a,myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director d S :Wlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished Applications Myrtle N 1040 (C) - DeniedMyrtle Ave N 1040 -Development Order 04- 17-07.doc 1:15 pm Case Number: FLD2007 -02001 -- 1040 N MYRTLE AVE Owner(s): Penethia Mack 1001 Mohawk St Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: 727 - 831 -7099, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Representative: Thomas M Sehlhorst 1050 N Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, 17133755 TELEPHONE: 727 - 444 -4411, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: trailways @peoplepc.com Location: 0.047 acre parcel along the west side of Myrtle Avenue between Metto and Jurgens Streets. Atlas Page: 268B Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development approval for an existing detached dwelling within the Commercial (C) District with a building height of 12 feet, an existing front (east) setback of 2.25 feet (to building), an existing front (west) setback of 30 feet (to building) and a proposed front (west) setback of zero feet (to pavement), an existing side (north) setback of 0.1 feet (to building) and a proposed side (north) setback of zero feet (to pavement), and an existing side (south) setback of 6.5 feet (to building) and a proposed side (south) setback of zero feet (to pavement) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Detached dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: No Email Neighborhood North Greenwood Association, Inc. Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33755 1201 Douglas Road TELEPHONE: 560 -4382, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: WADENWADE @AOL.COM Neighborhood Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 1828 Venetian Point Drive TELEPHONE: 461 -0564, FAX: No Fax, E -MAIL: southern @tampabay.rr.com Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Proper authorization from Pinellas County officials will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. Provide copies of plans signed by the County for site development and improvements to Pinellas Trail to e Raved access to the arkin s aces. 2. A 5 -foot side setback shall be provided from side proper mes per ontract Specifications and Standards Index #103. Applicant shall acknowledge the above prior to review by the Community Development Board. 1. Applicant shall obtain a Pinellas County right -of -way permit for any improvements to be made in Pinellas Trail right -of -way. The above condition shall be met prior to issuance of a building permit. Environmental: 1 . No Issues. Fire: Provide proper access from the address side of the building. 1040 Myrtle if the address for this property is going to change to 1003 Blanche B.Little John Trail then provide a roadway at 24' width able to with stand the 80,000 lb weight of fire appartus with a T -Turn Complying with NFPA -1 standards of Minimum length equal to length of longest fire apparatus Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 8, 2007 - Page 28 A Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . No issues. Parks and Recreation: No issues - renovations and parking residential home /office. Stormwater: 1 . No Issues Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. Will this home office allow for visiting customers? If not a handicapped parking space is not required. Planning: The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 8, 2007 - Page 29 1 . Pursuant to Section 2- 704.C.2 of the Community Development Code, a responce is required to be provided stating how the redevelopment will be consistent with the Goals and Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan as well as the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of the Code and with the intent and purpose of the zoning district. The response provided states only that the development proposal "upgrades the property, eliminates grass parking ", which is inconsistent with the requirement of the Code. It is noted that the stated intent and purpose of the Commercial (C) district is "to provide citizens with convenient access to goods and services throughout the City without adversely impacting the integrity of residential neighborhoods, diminishing the scenic quality of the City or negatively impacting the safe and efficient movement of people and things within the City". The establishment of a detached dwelling within the C district is found to be inconsistent with this intent and purpose; thus consistency with this criterion is not possible. 2. Pursuant to Section 2'704.C.3 of the Community Development Code, a response is required to be provided stating how development/improvment of adjacent properties would not be impeded through the redevelopment of the subject property. As the abutting properties to the north and south are zoned Commercial (C), how would the establishment of what would essentially be a non - conforming detached dwelling use on the subject property, which would necessitate the provision of substantially larger landscape buffers on the adjacent properties at time of their redevelopment, not create an impediment to their development/improvement? 3 . Pursuant to Section 2- 704.C.5 of the Community Development Code, the development proposal must demonstrate compliance with one or more of the listed objectives. The response provided states that the development proposal is consistent with objective "A" in that the use is permitted in the zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use. This is incorrect as detached dwellings are not permissable within the Commercial (C) district. Further, the development proposal cannot demonstrate compliance with any other listed objectives as the use will not be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; will not accommodate the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; will not provide for affordable housing; will not provide for development or redevelopment in an area characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in spot land use or zoning designation; and the proposed use will not provide for the development of a new, or preservation of an existing, working waterfront use. Thus, consistency with this criterion is not possible. 4. Pursuant to Section 2- 704.C.6 of the Community Development Code, flexibility with regard to use and setbacks must be justified based upon demonstrated compliance with all of the listed design objectives. While a complete response has not been provided relevent to each listed design objective, it is noted that objective "A" is consistent with Section 2- 704.C.3 for which compliance will be difficult if not impossible to be achieved, and with regard to objective "C" the proposed development will not be supportive of the emerging character of the area. Further, with regard to design objective "D ", the proposed development does not incorporate a substantial number (actually any) of the listed design elements. 5 . Pursuant to Section 3 -913.A of the Community Development Code, responces are to be provided for each of the General Applicability criteria stating how each criteria is being achieved. The development proposal is seeking specific approval for a detached dwelling within the Commercial (C) district where it would otherwise be a nonconforming use. As such, the response provided for General Applicability criterion #5 needs to be revised to address how the detached dwelling, existing though it may be, is consistent with the character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The architectural elevations denote that all existing siding is to be removed and replaced. However, the architectural elevations would also appear to depict the installation of siding beyond that which presently exists. Provide revised architectural elevations that clarify this. 7. No paved access exists to the proposed off - street parking spaces. A 24 -foot wide, all- weather surface will need to be provided to the proposed parking spaces. 8 . What is the purpose of the door and concrete steps at the southeast corner of the residence? The entrance provides no access to Myrtle Avenue and the proposed off - street parking will be virtually inaccessible based upon the location of the proposed a/c unit and the proximity to the south property line. It is suggested that the door and concrete steps are eliminated. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 8, 2007 - Page 30 4 9 . The application includes a requirement to establish a zero foot setback to pavement along the south property line for the proposed off - street parking; however this substantial of a deviation appears uneccessary as the off - street parking space could easily be shifted toward the north. It is suggested that the off - street parking spaces are located as centrally (north to south) as possible to the site. 10. A single- family detached dwelling has no requirement for a handicap accessible parking space. Eliminate the proposed handicap accessible parking space and replace with a standard parking space. 11 . The proposed floor plan is inconsistent with the site plan. The site plan depicts two (2) existing concrete steps along the south elevation, whereas the floor plan depicts only one (1). The floor plan also depicts a walkway connecting to the west elevation that is not depicted on the site plan as well as a concrete pad for an a/c on the south elevation. 12. The letter provided with the application from Paul Cozzie, references a site plan dated November 22, 2006. Provide a copy of this plan with a signed approval on the plan by Paul Cozzie. Other: No Comments Notes: While sufficient for the 04/17/07 CDB meeting, this item will be recommended for denial. Submit 15 collated, stapled and folded (as appropriate) copies of revised plans and application materials addressing all comments by Noon, March 15, 2007. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 8, 2007 - Page 31 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVEL.OPMENI' REVIEW February 9, 2007 Mr. Thomas M. Sehlhorst 1050 N. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33755 CITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posit OI'PIcI? Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FI.oPJDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL, SL:RVIcEs BuiLDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTU.- AVFNUE, CLEARWATIT, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLD2007- 02001 1040 N. Myrtle Avenue — Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Sehlhorst: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2007- 02001. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, March 8, 2007, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 E- Mail: r•ohert.te t cr�mycleaiivater.com PRANK 1111MARn, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCII:NIFNIB N I IMT 11AMI:10N, CoI:N(n.w:.vMFR BjI.1. JoNsoN, C:Ari.itN A. Prrn.Rsr:N, C0I:N0I yIFN1RrR "EQ1 jAL LMPLOYMI:NT AN:D Arru:nIATIVI; Ac'ru>N HIMP1.0) 1 :1," a� rrec m 1 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVEL.OPMENI' REVIEW February 9, 2007 Mr. Thomas M. Sehlhorst 1050 N. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33755 CITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posit OI'PIcI? Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FI.oPJDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL, SL:RVIcEs BuiLDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTU.- AVFNUE, CLEARWATIT, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLD2007- 02001 1040 N. Myrtle Avenue — Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Sehlhorst: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2007- 02001. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, March 8, 2007, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 E- Mail: r•ohert.te t cr�mycleaiivater.com PRANK 1111MARn, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCII:NIFNIB N I IMT 11AMI:10N, CoI:N(n.w:.vMFR BjI.1. JoNsoN, C:Ari.itN A. Prrn.Rsr:N, C0I:N0I yIFN1RrR "EQ1 jAL LMPLOYMI:NT AN:D Arru:nIATIVI; Ac'ru>N HIMP1.0) 1 :1," r RJ siai0 LONG RvNGE PIANNING DEVIiI.OPmI;N,i, R:VIEW February 5, 2007 Mr. Thomas M Sehlhorst 1050 N. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33755 CITY QE CLEARWAT ER PI A,NNING DEPARTMENT POST dFFICfi Box 4748, CLF:ARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH M.YRTI,E AVENUti, CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4865 Re: FLD2007-02001 — 1040 N. Myrtle Avenue — Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Sehlhorst: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2007- 02001. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: Pursuant to Section G of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application, a site plan is required to be submitted that depicts the following: ❑ all dimensions; ❑ all required setbacks; ❑ all existing and proposed points of access; ❑ all required sight triangles; ❑ location of all rights -of -way within and. adjacent to the site; and ❑ location of all existing public /private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines. The plot plan attempting to be used as a site plan does not accomplish the provision of the above. Further, a note provided beneath the plot plan states the following: "Existing home: No parking or paving with this project ". The project for which this plan has been submitted is for parking/paving. 2. Pursuant to Section I of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application, the building elevation drawings are to depict all dimensions. The building elevation drawings provided do not depict the building height. 3. It is noted that the survey denotes the peak of roof as being 13.7 feet above existing ground. However, the building elevation drawings provided depict the peak of roof as being approximately 13 feet above finished floor. The drawings (and possibly the survey) will need to be revised to correctly depict the height of the building as measured from existing grade to the. midpoint between the peak and eave of the main roof structure. Pursuant to Section 4 -202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be FRANK 1111MARD. MAYOR J01 IN D0 1011N, C(WN(:nAu:MBFR IiI>)-r I1AWIXON, C�ltayCII_�IF.�1fil {I: Hn.I. Ic;:<tic x, C;c I, ac:u; ir: ?,utrit CARI.I .N A prri: sr\, CIumiil.mi:mtwi,, "EIQ iAL F- MI)L<)1'i41[NT .AAO Aiti:II�PI,AI'IVi? i1(� IlO :' taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Monday, February 13, 2007. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III[ Tel: (727) 562 -4539 Fax: (727) 562 -4865 E -Mail: robert. tefft 2myclearwater. com PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION November 2, 2006 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CUARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 -4748 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4750 FAx (727) 562 -4755 Pinellas County Culture, Education and Leisure Attn: Mr. Paul Cozzie, Bureau Director ' 631 Chestnut Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: 1040 Myrtle Avenue (F.K.A.1003 Blanche B. Littlejohn Trail) Atlas 268B Dear Mr. Cozzie: Because of the site constraints of the property referenced above, a driveway connection to Myrtle Avenue is not obtainable. Therefore, the only access to the site is through the Pinellas Trail corridor. The City of Clearwater has requested Mr. Tom Sehlhorst, owner of the above referenced property, to obtain an ingress / egress easement over an area located within Pinellas Trail corridor to access his property. This easement would provide him the right to use the Pinellas Trail corridor to gain access to the proposed parking spaces, which are shown on the attached site plan. The .City will also require the owner to extend the existing pavement, 24 ft in width, with an all weather surface to the these parking spaces. The City will require the easement to be recorded with Official Records and road improvements for the access to the property prior to site plan approval. The previous owner used the existing dirt road to gain access to this property, which is unacceptable to today standards. It is our understanding that the proposed use of this site will be residential with a commercial component. Should you have any questions please contact Donald Melone at 562 -4798 Very truly yours Donald D. Melone Engineering Specialist I CC: Community Response: Jeff I,�' ronschnabl Building Official: Kevin Garriott Owner Attachments: S /Engin /Word /Myrtle Ave 1040 Sehlhorst PRANK HIBBARD, MAMN JOHN 1)(MAN, COHNCILMEN11E1t I I(AT I IAnurrtm, C01!NC11A1:Nn;eK 131I.i. JoN.SoN, ("OHNCRMHMBI'.H ® CAI\1.I'.N A. Pia fP:1,S1:N, CUI,NCII_ il:Vltha; CDB Meeting Date: April 17, 2007 Case Number: FLD2007 -02001 Agenda Item: E. 1. Owners /Applicant: Penethia Mack Agent: Thomas M. Sehlhorst Address: 1040 N. Myrtle Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for an existing detached dwelling within the Commercial (C) District on a parcel of land with a lot area of 2,070 square feet (0.048 acres) and a lot width of 31 feet, with an existing building height of 12 feet, an existing front (east) setback of 2.1 feet (to building), an existing front (west) setback of 30 feet (to building) and a proposed front (west) setback of zero feet (to pavement), an existing side (north) setback of 0.1 feet (to building) and a proposed side (north) setback of zero feet (to pavement), and an existing side (south) setback of 6.5 feet (to building) and a proposed side (south) setback of zero feet (to pavement) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code. ZONING: Commercial (C) FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Commercial General (CG) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Detached Dwelling (Nonconforming Use) Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling SURROUNDING ZONING North: Commercial (C) Office AND USES: South: Commercial (C) Vacant/Outdoor Storage East: Commercial (C) and Institutional (I) Place of Worship West: Commercial (C) Pinellas Trail and Detached Dwellings Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 —Page 1 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.048 -acre subject property is located along the west side of North Myrtle Avenue between Metto and Jurgens Streets. The subject property has a zoning designation of Commercial (C) with an underlying and compatible future land use designation of Commercial General (CG). The subject property consists of a nonconforming, 722 square foot, single - family detached dwelling, which according to the records of the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, was constructed in 1954. The exact zoning designation applied to the subject property at that time is unknown; however in 1939 the property was zoned Business District (B), which did permit the establishment of single - family dwellings and it is believed that this designation was still in place at the time the existing structure was built. In addition to the property's 1939 zoning designation, subsequent zoning designations are also known. However, these designations, General Business District (CG) in 1972, Neighborhood Commercial (CN) in 1985, Commercial Infill (CD in 1994, and the current designation of Commercial (C) either do not permit the use of single - family detached dwellings or would not permit a single - family detached dwelling on a parcel the size of the subject property or with setbacks consistent with those of the existing structure. Therefore, it is established that the subject property, structure and use have been nonconforming since 1972; thus the provisions of Article 6 of the Community Development Code would apply, and are discussed later in this staff report. In addition to the above, it is noted that on June 27, 2006, the nonconforming structure was cited as being unsafe with numerous code violations for both the interior and exterior of the structure (UNS2006- 00050). Development Proposal: The application proposes the renovation of the existing single - family detached dwelling along with the installation of a driveway to accommodate two off - street parking spaces at the west side of the property. As discussed in greater detail below, the development proposal also includes the establishment of minimum building and pavement setbacks, a maximum building height, and a parking requirement for the proposed Detached Dwelling use. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community Development Code is discussed below.. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to Section 2 -701.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum I.S.R. within the CG Future Land Use category is 0.95. As proposed, the development will have an I.S.R. of approximately 0.58 and therefore meets the above requirement. Use: Pursuant to Section 2 -704 of the Community Development Code, within the C District a Detached Dwelling is not a permitted use. While the proposed use is not permitted within the district, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #5 states that, in part, "the proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category ". The Countywide Plan Rules list "Residential" as a Secondary Use within the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use category. Therefore, as a result of the above referenced provision, the request has been made to permit the establishment of what would otherwise be a nonconforming Detached Dwelling on the subject property. The following are the applicable criteria for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects, the applicants response as to how each criteria is met/achieved through the development proposal, and staff's analysis of the criteria and response: Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 — Page 2 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and /or development standards set forth in this zoning district. "Building cannot be upgraded to new code without zoning setback for two parking spaces ". Staff agrees with the applicant in that redevelopment of the subject property is impractical (and likely impossible) without deviations from the development standards of the Commercial (C) District, based upon the size of the property and the location of the existing structure upon it. Therefore, a positive finding can be made with regard to this Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. "The establishment of a detached dwelling in this C District is consistent with 80% of detached dwellings already here in C District. The home office is an already approved use for this unit, the only negative impact is a denied request would require a boarded up building, the City requires approval for improvement. This area has had five different zoning classifications, it started as General Commercial with homes and groceries, then it was changed to residential for more homes, all businesses were removed, then it was Commercial Infill, with restrictions and no businesses gained, then it was changed to Commercial Neighborhood, mostly older homes led to drug dealers and rentals. Then came Commercial which eliminated all 15 auto repair facilities in area, no auto related business was allowed. No new buildings in the area in last 10 years, except by applicant". The response provided by the applicant does not address any aspect of the subject criterion. The consistency of the proposed nonconforming use with other nonconforming uses in the district as well as the various zoning designations that the area has had over the years are immaterial. Further, the response addresses neither how the development will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, nor the intent and purpose of the zoning district. Pursuant to Future Land Use Policy 3.2.2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan, residential land uses shall be appropriately located on local and minor collector streets; if appropriately buffered; they may be located on major collector and arterial streets. Based upon this adopted Policy, only if appropriately buffered may residential land uses be located along arterial streets such as Myrtle Avenue. The existing structure on the subject property is set back only two feet from the right -of- way and cannot be adequately buffered so as to support the establishment/location of a residential use; thus the development proposal is inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Pursuant to Section 2 -701 of the Community Development Code, the intent and purpose of the Commercial (C) District is to provide the citizens of the City with convenient access to goods and services throughout the City without adversely impacting the integrity of residential neighborhoods, diminishing the scenic quality of the City or negatively impacting the safe and efficient movement of people and things within the City. Based upon the above and given the location of the subject property adjacent to existing non - residential development, the establishment of a residential use at this location within the district would be inconsistent with the districts intent and purpose. Based upon all of the above, a positive finding with regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #2 cannot be made. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007- 02001— Page 3 "Adjacent property to the north is same use and classification as applicant was approved by the City review board, also is approving this applicant. South lot is a dirt pile and heavy equipment, sewer pipe storage, and heavy equipment repair area has been therefor two years, and will be therefor three more years, any development is far down the road, as per the south property". While the applicants' description of the adjacent property to the south is generally accurate, timeframes not withstanding, the accompanying statement that the adjacent property to the north (1050 N. Myrtle Avenue) is of the same use as that being proposed is an incorrect one. This adjacent property was granted variances by the Development Code Adjustment Board on July 11, 1996, for development as an office, whereas the proposed use of the subject property is as a Detached Dwelling. Further, the applicants' response does not discuss how the development proposal will not impede development and improvement of surrounding property. If the proposed Detached Dwelling were to be established on the subject property, then several impedances to the development or improvement of adjacent properties would result. These impedances are as follows: ❑ The height of potential Office, Overnight Accommodation, Restaurant, and/or Retail Sales and Service uses on adjacent parcels would be limited as the increased heights of these uses would not be permitted to reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential property [ref.: Sections 2- 704.11, K, M and N]; ❑ Any potential Off - Street Parking use would be required to provide a wall or fence of at least four feet in height that is landscaped on the exterior side with a continuous hedge or non- deciduous vine where adjacent to residentially used or zoned property [ref.: Section 2- 704.I]; • Any potential Self Storage use would not be permissible on any adjacent parcel [ref: Section 2- 704.P]; and • The perimeter landscape buffer on the adjacent properties would be required to be increased from five feet to 12 feet, and necessitate a hedge reaching a height of six feet within three years of planting [ref.: Section 3- 1202.D.1]. It is noted that the establishment of the Detached Dwelling on the subject property will create a nonconformity on the adjacent property to the north (1050 N. Myrtle Avenue) with regard to this Code requirement. Based upon all of the above, a positive finding with regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #3 cannot be made. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. `Adjoining north property already developed and south lot vacant for years ". The response provided by the applicant does not address the actual criterion. Further, as stated in staffs' response to the previous criterion that the establishment of the proposed Detached Dwelling would impede the development and improvement of the adjoining properties; these same properties may very well also suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed Detached Dwelling. The loss of a potential development option, the loss of potential building height for other development options, and the addition of further fencing and landscaping development requirements above that which would otherwise be required of other development certainly result in a substantial detriment to those adjoining properties. Moreover, the adjacent property to the north would suffer an Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 — Page 4 immediate substantial detriment, as the establishment of the proposed Detached Dwelling would create a nonconformity on said adjacent property. Based upon the above, a positive finding with regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #4 cannot be made. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying Future Land Use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a Minimum Standard, Flexible Standard or Flexible Development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and /or preservation of a working waterfront use. "This application will contribute to supply the area with an affordable house with employment, no driving time, available access at all times, more productivity, subject property has increased in value from $30,000 to $200,000 with improvements by architect, who will occupy the home office, other similar development is non existent, area has no new buildings in the last 10 years, an architects home office is an excellent use and contributor for this property." As discussed previously, the Countywide Plan Rules list "Residential" as a Secondary Use within the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use category. Further, the proposed Detached Dwelling is not necessarily incompatible with adjacent land uses, and would not necessarily substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood. However, the proposed use does not demonstrate compliance with any of the objectives listed within the criterion. The specific failures of compliance are demonstrated below: a. The proposed use is not permitted in the Commercial (C) District as either a Minimum Standard, Flexible Standard or Flexible Development use. b. The proposed use will not be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base, as a single - family detached dwelling creates no jobs. The applicants' statement that this will somehow create employment is uncertain, as there is no guarantee that the dwelling would ever contain a home occupation. Even if the Detached Dwelling was to contain a home occupation, only those family members residing within the dwelling unit are permitted to engage in the occupation [ref.: Section 3- 1102.A.2]. c. The proposed use will not accommodate the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor, as it is a single - family detached dwelling. d. The provision of a solitary Detached Dwelling that, per the applicants' own statement, has increased in value more than 660% (occurring between July and October 2006 — Pinellas County Property Appraiser) would hardly appear to constitute affordable housing. Further, Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 — Page 5 pursuant to the Economic Development Department for the City of Clearwater, the maximum sales price possible to be considered an affordable housing unit is $180,000. e. The proposed use is located in an area where other similar development exists, despite the applicants' apparent contradiction to this in his response. However, these similar developments are all nonconforming uses and per Code are not intended to remain. Therefore, making a finding of compliance for this criterion based upon a nonconforming use being in an area comprised of other similar nonconforming uses would be poor planning practice. f. The proposed use does not have any frontage on a body of water; therefore the development/preservation of a new or existing waterfront use is not possible and this criterion is not applicable. Based upon the above, a positive finding with regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #5 cannot be made. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. "This does not impede future or surrounding properties in any way. Design Guidelines are accentuated by design work done as pictured for interior, exterior will have a decorative walkway, all stucco work will be under direction of leading stucco design team with distinctive railings and window designs on exterior, the distinctive roof for will be complimented with landscaping changes to complete". The flexibility being requested as part of this development proposal with regard to use, lot width, setbacks, height and off - street parking are not justifiable, as the proposal has failed to demonstrate compliance with all of the required design objectives. The specific failures of compliance are demonstrated below: a. A finding that the development proposal will impede the development and improvement of surrounding properties has already been made with criterion #3, above. Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 — Page 6 b. There are no design guidelines that are applicable to the subject property. c. The response provided by the applicant does not address this point of the criterion. While many of the structures in the area are of similar design, scale and intensity, that character is also coupled with being nonconforming single - family detached dwellings, which per Code are not intended to remain. The ultimate character of the area is intended to be of a commercial nature; and therefore making a finding of compliance for this criterion based upon a nonconforming use being in an area comprised of other similar nonconforming uses would be poor planning practice. d. The applicant states that the exterior will include a decorative walkway; stucco to be done by a leading design team; and distinctive roof, railings and window designs. However, the architectural elevations submitted with the application propose to remove and replace the existing siding and not to install stucco. The elevations do propose a railing; however the railing proposed is more ordinary than it is distinctive. The elevations also do not propose distinctive windows. In fact, the windows depicted appear to be the very same single -hung windows with simple box surrounds that exist on the present building. As for the roof, the elevations depict the very same roof that exists today, and not a distinctive roof as proposed in the applicants' statement. There does appear to be a walkway proposed from the parking area to the west side of the building; however no detail is provided as to the walkways decorative nature and the site plan does not indicate this as being a decorative walkway. In summary, none of the elements stated by the applicant appear to be proposed, and the architectural elevations incorporate none of those design elements listed in the subject criterion. e. The applicant states that the building architecture will be complimented with landscaping; however the development proposal includes no landscape plan and nowhere else in the application is any form of landscape material proposed to support this statement. The existing building has virtually no setback along the north property line and a very minimal setback along the east property line, and it is not expected that any more substantial buffer be provided between said building and property lines. However, where adequate space does exist, such as along the south property line and that portion of the north property line not abutting the existing building, an appropriate buffer and/or landscape could be provided. Based upon the above, a positive finding with regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #6 cannot be made. Based upon the above, the application has been determined to meet only one of the six required Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria; therefore the proposed use cannot be approved. Lot Area / Lot Width: Pursuant to Section 2 -704 of the Community Development Code, within the Commercial (C) District there are no applicable minimum lot area or lot width requirements for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. Further, as a Detached Dwelling is not a permitted use within the C District, there are no minimum lot area or lot width requirements that can be transferred from the development standards of the Minimum Standard, Flexible Standard or Flexible Development application types for this development proposal. Therefore, without any applicable requirements, the application proposes the approval of the existing lot area (2,069.1 square feet, 0.048 acres) and lot width (31 feet). According to the records of the Pinellas County Property Appraisers Office, the subject property was platted in 1895 as part of J. J. Eldridge Subdivision, Lot 45, Block E. Subsequent to its platting, Lot 45, Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 — Page 7 Block E was subdivided by meets and bounds descriptions into multiple lots; the eastern 30 feet of these lots, was dedicated as right -of -way for Myrtle Avenue; and several of the lots were recombined into the three- parcel configuration that exists today. The City's records indicate that the subject property has existed with its present lot area and lot width since Lot 45, Block E was initially subdivided (a period likely spanning the past 50 years) and with the assimilation of the property with the adjacent parcels to the north and/or south the only available option to increase its size and width, the opportunity for the subject property to become more substantial in size is not possible. Based upon the above, a positive finding can be made with regard to the existing /proposed lot area and lot width. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Section 2 -704 of the Community Development Code, within the C District there are no applicable setbacks for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. Further, as a Detached Dwelling is not a permitted use within the C District, there are no setbacks that can be transferred from the development standards of the Minimum Standard, Flexible Standard or Flexible Development application types for this development proposal. Without any applicable setback standards, the application proposes the approval of the existing setbacks (to building) as follows: a front (east) setback of 2.1 feet; a front (west) setback of 30 feet; a side (north) setback of 0.1 feet; and a side (south) setback of 6.5 feet. In addition, the application includes a request for the approval of setbacks to the proposed off - street parking spaces and (to pavement) as follows: a front (west) setback of zero feet; a side (north) setback of zero feet; and a side (south) setback of zero feet. As with the above discussion pertaining to lot width and lot area, the existing building setbacks have been nonconforming for at least the past 50 years. The buildings nonconforming setbacks do not prevent the redevelopment or reuse of the subject property. In fact, given the size of the property, any building, whether it is a newly constructed one or the existing building, would require substantial setback deviations. Given the above, the application's proposal to retain the existing building with those setbacks already in existence is supportable. In contrast to the setbacks for the existing building, those setbacks proposed for the parking area and the front steps leading to Myrtle Avenue do not exist and do not have to exist as proposed. The application proposes a parking area 18 feet deep and 27 feet wide with a setback of 5.45 feet along the south property line and absolutely no setback along the north property line. As discussed in greater detail later in this report, the proposed Detached Dwelling requires two off - street parking spaces, which as per Section 3- 1402.A of the Community Development Code would require a total pavement width of 18 feet. What has been proposed is a pavement width sufficient to accommodate three off - street parking spaces — a pavement width nine feet greater than is necessary. If the proposed pavement width were reduced by this excessive nine feet, then the application would require less severe setback deviations along the north and south property lines, and the proposal would still be able to meet its off - street parking requirement. However, as proposed, the setbacks for the proposed parking area are excessive and cannot be supported. With regard to the front steps leading to Myrtle Avenue, the site plan gives no clear indication as to how well these steps will function. The depth at which the steps will need to extend into the subject property is unclear, as is the proximity of these steps to the existing landing along the buildings south elevation. It appears that the site plan has not taken into consideration how these existing and new elements will interact. The landing empties to its west side (toward the interior of the property), where it would seem more sensible for the landing to be redesigned so that it empties to its south or east side; thus enabling a more simple connection to the proposed steps leading to Myrtle Avenue — one that does not require the provision of a redundant, parallel walkway along the south side of the landing; that increases the amount Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 — Page 8 of impervious area on the subject property; that reduces the area where landscaping could be provided; and that exacerbates the amount of pavement for which a reduced setback will be required. Further, the applicant states that the steps will not encroach onto the sidewalk within the Myrtle Avenue right -of -way, but the concrete retaining wall that is in the right -of -way will need to be modified and will require the approval of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). If approval from FDOT cannot be obtained, then it is the position of the City's Fire Department that adequate life safety service cannot be provided given the existing level of access to the property. The alternative to the provision of the point of access along Myrtle would be, as per the Fire Department; the extension of a roadway along the west side of the property that is able to withstand the weight of an 80,000 pound fire apparatus, has a width of 24 feet, and at its northern terminus consists of T -turn in compliance with NFPA -1 standards as to minimum length equal to length of the longest fire apparatus. Based upon the above, positive findings cannot be made for all of the proposed setbacks, but specifically for those requests being made to pavement along the north and south property lines. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Section 2 -704 of the Community Development Code, within the C District there is no applicable maximum building height for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects. Further, as a Detached Dwelling is not a permitted use within the C District, there is no maximum building height that can be transferred from the development standards of the Minimum Standard, Flexible Standard or Flexible Development application types for this development proposal. Without an applicable building height standard, the application proposes the approval of the existing building height of 12 feet as measured from existing grade to the midpoint of the pitched roof. As a building height of 12 feet would not be objectionable given any use permitted within the City regardless of zoning district, and the height will not be inconsistent with other development in the area, a positive finding can be made with regard to building height. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2 -704 of the Community Development Code, within the C District, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects shall have their minimum off - street parking requirement determined by the Community Development Coordinator based upon the specific use and/or the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual standards. It is noted that a Detached Dwelling is not a permitted use within the C District; therefore no minimum off - street parking requirement can be transferred from the development standards of the Minimum Standard, Flexible Standard or Flexible Development application types upon which the development proposal's off - street parking requirement can be based. However, where Detached Dwellings are permitted by the Code, two off - street parking spaces are required. The development proposal includes the provision of a paved area at the west side of the property that can accommodate three off - street parking spaces. Based upon the above, it has been determined that the off - street parking requirement for the proposed Detached Dwelling use would be met. Solid Waste Containers and Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3- 201.D.1 of the Community Development Code, all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view from public streets and abutting properties by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or vegetation. The proposed site plan depicts a new air conditioning unit at the southwest corner of the building, however this mechanical equipment does not comply with the above provision, as it does not depict the means by which the equipment will be screened from view of the adjacent properties and right -of -way. Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 — Page 9 Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3 -911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. With the redevelopment of the subject property, whether by this application or another, all on -site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, shall be placed underground as part of its redevelopment. Nonconforming Provisions: As previously discussed, both the structure and the use of the property as a single - family detached dwelling are nonconforming and the provisions of Article 6 of the Community Development Code (Nonconforming Provisions) are applicable. It is the stated purpose /intent of these provisions that nonconforming properties are brought "into compliance with the provisions of this.Code in conjunction with a change of use, redevelopment, or any other change of condition of the property in order to eliminate the nonconformity or to bring the nonconformity as practical as possible to a conforming status ". Further, Sections 6 -102.E and 6 -103.D of the Community Development Code state that in the event the use of a nonconforming structure and/or a nonconforming use is discontinued or abandoned for a period of six consecutive months, the use shall not thereafter be re- established or resumed and any subsequent use of the land or structure shall conform to all of the requirements of the Code. As of June 27, 2006, and quite possibly even earlier, the nonconforming use of the subject property has been abandoned; thus the use of the property/structure as a single - family detached dwelling is no longer permissible under the regulations of the Community Development Code. Based upon the discontinued/abandoned standing of the nonconforming use and by virtue of the fact that a Detached Dwelling is not a permitted use within the C District and therefore cannot conform to all of the requirements of the Code, the application for the establishment of a Detached Dwelling on the Commercially designated subject property cannot be approved. Floor Plan: The proposed floor plan is inconsistent with, the proposed site plan. The site plan depicts a concrete landing with steps emptying toward the west along the buildings south elevation, whereas the floor plan depicts steps without a landing extending southward from the buildings south elevation. The floor plan also depicts a concrete pad for mechanical equipment on the south elevation that is not depicted on the site plan, and the air conditioning unit that is proposed along the west elevation on the site is not depicted on the floor plan. Paved Access: No continuous paved access exists to the proposed off - street parking spaces. The existing pavement within the Pinellas Trail right -of -way does not extend northward a sufficient distance to be utilized by the subject property such that continuous paved access exists. In order to establish the proposed back -out parking spaces along the west side of the property, the property owner must extend the pavement northward a sufficient distance that continuous paved access is provided to the northern property line of the subject property. It is noted that the extension of this paved access may be required to be 24 -feet in width and constructed of an all- weather surface. Pinellas County: Included with the application was a letter originally dated December 21, 1999, from N.E. "Ray" Rayburn, Public Works Engineering Supervisor, Pinellas County, and subsequently re -dated on July 10, 2000, and June 28, 2006. This same letter was also re -dated March 14, 2007, and signed by Sandy Kelley, Director, Construction Management, Pinellas County. The letter states that Pinellas County has "no objection to the continued vehicular access and use of the Pinellas Trail right -of -way along the east side of the Trail from Cedar Street north to the existing guardrail", and that "no additional improvements in the Pinellas Trail right -of -way are required by Pinellas County". However, the letter is silent on two key issues. First, the letter does not indicate that the County would approve of an extension of the existing paved access within the Pinellas Trail right -of -way, and second, that the County has seen and/or approves of the improvements proposed by the applicant for the subject property, Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 —Page 10 which even if the County has seen the proposal, it should be noted that the site plan fails to indicate anything with regard to an extension of the pavement within the Trail right -of -way; so it is quite likely that the County is unaware of this required extension. The lack of such information, and the possibility that the County may not approve of the installation of improvements within the Trail right -of -way that would be required by the City for the approval of the development proposal, is damaging to the potential viability of the proposal. The application also contained another letter from Pinellas County; this one re -dated January 30, 2007, and signed by Paul Cozzie, Bureau Director. This letter states that the County has no objection to a site plan dated November 22, 2006, and the associated two parking spaces. However, as with the prior letter, this one also has issues, principally that this site plan was never provided to the City; and the plans the City now has depict three parking spaces, not two. If such information is to be considered, the actual site plan should be submitted, complete with all improvements that are to be required, and the statement of no objection provided on said site plan, not as a separate document. Code Enforcement Analysis: As noted previously, a citation for an unsafe structure was issued on the subject property on June 27, 2006 (UNS2006- 00050). The citation, which remains active, lists several infractions regarding both the interior and the exterior of the structure. The infractions are as follows: Interior: The building, structure or portion thereof as a result of decay, deterioration or dilapidation is likely to fully or partially collapse. • Electrical system is not to Code; • Plumbing is not to Code; ❑ Floor system is deteriorated; • Walls are deteriorated; • Bathroom doors, walls and floor are deteriorated; and ❑ There are numerous holes in the walls. Exterior: The building, structure or portion thereof has been damaged by fire, flood, earthquake, wind or other cause to the extent that the structural integrity of the building or structure is less than it was prior to the damage and is less than the minimum requirement established by the Standard Building Code for new buildings. • Plumbing running from structure to underground is not to Code; • The stairs are not to Code; ❑ Perimeter beam appears to be damaged and it appears to have no tie downs for structure; ❑ Siding is falling off; ❑ There are broken windows; and ❑ The entry doors are deteriorated and open. Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 — Page 11 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2 -701.1 and 2 -704 of the Community Development Code: ' See above discussion with regard to Lot Area /Lot Width. 2 See above discussion with'regard to Maximum Building Height. 3 See above discussion with regard to Minimum Setbacks. 4 See above discussion with regard to Minimum Off - Street Parking. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects): Standard Pro osed Consistent Inconsistent I.S.R. 0.95 0.58 X 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of Lot Area N/A 2,069.1 square feet (0.048 acres) X' Lot Width N/A 31 feet X' Building Height N/A 12 feet X2 development and improvement of surrounding properties. Setbacks Front: N/A East: 2.1 feet (to building) X3 X development West: 30 feet (to building) X3 X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the 0 feet (to pavement) essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance Side: N/A North: 0.1 feet (to building) X3 a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, 0 feet (to pavement) flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's South: 6.5 feet (to building) X3 0 feet (to pavement) Off - Street Detached Dwelling: N/A 3 off - street parking spaces X° Parking I characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan ' See above discussion with regard to Lot Area /Lot Width. 2 See above discussion with'regard to Maximum Building Height. 3 See above discussion with regard to Minimum Setbacks. 4 See above discussion with regard to Minimum Off - Street Parking. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects): Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007- 02001— Page 12 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007- 02001— Page 12 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913.A of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off - street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: X a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning X district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted X by the City; X c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; X d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3 -913.A of the Community Development Code: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of March 8, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.048 -acre subject property is located along the west side of North Myrtle Avenue between Metto and Jurgens Streets; 2. That the subject property is located within the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District; 4. That Detached Dwellings are not a permitted use within the Commercial (C) District; Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 — Page 13 Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of March 8, 2007, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.048 -acre subject property is located along the west side of North Myrtle Avenue between Metto and Jurgens Streets; 2. That the subject property is located within the Commercial General (CG) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the subject property is located within the Commercial (C) District; 4. That Detached Dwellings are not a permitted use within the Commercial (C) District; Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 — Page 13 5. That the most recent use of the subject property as a Detached Dwelling is a nonconforming use; and 6. That the existing single - family detached dwelling on the subject property has been cited as being an unsafe structure (UNS2006- 00050). Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per Section 2 -704 of the Community Development Code with regard to the proposed minimum setbacks to pavement; 2. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.2 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project); 3. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.3 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project); 4. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.4 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project); 5. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.5 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project); 6. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 704.C.6 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project); 7. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3- 913.A.1 of the Community Development Code; 8. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3- 913.A.2 of the Community Development Code; and 9. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3- 913.A.5 of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development approval for an existing detached dwelling within the Commercial (C) District on a parcel of land with a lot area of 2,069.1 square feet (0.048 acres) and a lot width of 31 feet, with an existing building height of 12 feet, an existing front (east) setback of 2.1 feet (to building), an existing front (west) setback of 30 feet (to building) and a proposed front (west) setback of zero feet (to pavement), an existing side (north) setback of 0.1 feet (to building) and a proposed side (north) setback of zero feet (to pavement), and an existing side (south) setback of 6.5 feet (to building) and a proposed side (south) setback of zero feet (to pavement) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Section 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code.! Prepared by Planning Department Staff.` G% i Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Location Map ❑ Aerial Map ❑ Future Land Use Map ❑ Zoning Map ❑ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ❑ Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIMyrtle Ave S1040 (C) 04-17-07(RI)Myrtle Ave S1040- StaffReport 04- 17- 07.doc Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007 -02001 — Page 14 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562 -4539 robert.tefftAmyclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in -depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs /services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board — April 17, 2007 FLD2007- 02001— Page 15 Property Appraiser General Information: 03/29/15/59598/008 /0010 Card 1 Interactive Map of this Comparable Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector parcel L,istin$ Results Search Information Page,1 of 4 (l uestion/Comment about this page 03/29/15/59598/008 /0010 Building 1x Data Current as of March 11, 2007 [10:37 am Friday March 16] µ' Residential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Printr: = t Single Family Property Use: 210 Living Units: 1 5 NAVAJO PARK REVISED BLK H, LOTS 1 THRU 4 INCL 2006 Exemptions Homestead: Yes Use: 100% Ownership: 100% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2006 Value Save - Our -Homes Can 2006 Tax Information Comparable Sales value based on sales from Tax District: CW 2004 -2005: $201,400 Millage: 21.7640 Just/Market Value: $173,800 Special Tax: $.00 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $75,499 Taxes: $1,099.06 History Taxable Value: $50,499 Taxes without Save- Our -Homes cap: $3,238.48 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without any exemptions: $3,782.58 occur when sold. Click here for details. Owner/Mailing Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price Q/U V/I Address 7/1992 7987/1547 $58;000 Q I MACK, PENETHIA T 11/1986 6355/2088 $51,800 M I 1001 MOHAWK ST 1001 MOHAWK ST CLEARWATER FL Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) 33755 -1833 1925 007/063 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Single Family 07987/1547 (01) Census Tract: Evacuation Zone: NON - 261.00 EVAC http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ radet.php ?pn = 1529035959800800101 3/16/2007 Property Appraiser General Information: 03/29/15/59598/008 /0010 Card 1 Seawall: No Land Use Single Family(01) Land Information Frontage: None Land Size Unit Value 100 x 110 1,225.00 Structural Elements Foundation: Continuous Wall Floor System: Slab on Grade Exterior Wall: Concrete Block Stucco /Reclad Roof Frame: Gable -Hip Roof Cover: Composite - Shingle 1 Story Floor Finish: Carpet/Vinyl /Asphalt/Soft Wood/Terazzo Interior Finish: Drywall /Plaster Fixtures: 6 Quality: Average Year Built: 1952 Effective Age: 30 Heating: Central Duct Cooling: Cooling (Central) Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 0 Economic Depreciation: 0 Page 2 of 4 View: Units Method 100.00 F Open plot in New Window View Floor: 1 Help http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ radet.php ?pn = 1529035959800800101 3/16/2007 Property Appraiser General Information: 03/29/15/59598/008 /0010 Card 1 0 Description Base Area Utility Room Finished Screen Porch Finished Open Porch Finished Garage Unfinished Page 3 of 4 Sub Area Information Living Area Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Factor Effective Ft2 1,305 1,305 1.00 1,305 Total Living SF: 1,305 75 .35 26 225 .25 56 80 .20 16 705 .25 176 Total Gross SF: 2,390 Total Effective SF: 1,580 Residential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value /Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year Patio /Deck $6.00 324 $1,940.00 $780.00 1962 http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ radet.php ?pn = 1529035959800800101 3/16/2007 Property Appraiser General Information: 03/29/15/59598/008 /0010 Card 1 Page 4 of 4 adius (feet):; 330 e als: O None 0 2000 ransparency:; 0.5 Update Map ,,, How to copy and paste a static map using Internet Explorer: Right -click on the map; Select "Copy SVG "; Open a Word document; Select "Paste Special" from Edit menu on toolbar; Select Bitmap, then OK How to copy and paste a static map using Mozilla Firefox: Right -click on the map; Select "This Frame "; Select "Open Frame in New Window "; Print from the new window. Interactive Map of this Comparable Sales Back to OuerX New Tax Collector Question/Comment about ap rcel Listing Results Search Information this pie http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ radet.php ?pn = 1529035959800800101 3/16/2007 Property Appraiser General Info - nation: 09/29/15/25542/005 /0452 Card 1 Interactive Map of this Comparable Sales Back to ue New Tax Collector parcel Listing Results Search Information Page 1 of 4 Question/Comment_about this pie 09/29/15/25542/005 /0452 Building 1 Data Current as of February 04, 2007 A [8:20 am Monday February 5] Residential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Single Family Property Use: 210 Living Units: 1 ELDRIDGE, J. J. BLK E, S 31FT OF N 157FT OF LOT 45 LESS E 30FT FOR RD RAV 2006 Exemptions Homestead: No Use: 0% Ownership: 0% Tax Exempt: 0% Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2006 Value 2006 Tax Information Comparable Sales value based on sales from Tax District: CW 2004 -2005: $54,000 Millage: 21.7640 Just/Market Value_ $42,500 Special Tax: $.00 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap$42,500 Taxes: $924.97 His" Taxable Value: $42,500 Taxes without Save - Our -Homes cap: $924.97 A significant taxable value increase may Taxes without any exemptions: $924.97 occur when sold. Click here for details. Mailing Address Property Address Sale Date Book/Page Price QIU V/I MACK, PENETHIA 10/2006 15417/237 $199,000 Q I 1001 MOHAWK ST CLEARWATER FL .1040 N MYRTLE AVE RWATER 7/2006 15241/1638 $30,000 Q 1 33755 -1833 5/2006 15091/498 $30,000 U I Parcel Information Plat Year Plat Book/Page(s) Book/Page: Land Use: Single Family 1895 OHl/ 085 15417/0237 (01) Census Tract: Evacuation Zone: NON- 262.00 EVAC http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ radet.php ?pn = 1529092554200504521 2/5/2007 Property Appraiser General Information: 09/29/15/25542/005 /0452 Card 1 Seawall: No Land Use Single Family(01) I Foundation: Piers Land Information Frontage: None Land Size Unit Value 31 x 66 7.00 Structural Elements Floor System: Wood Exterior Wall: Frame /Reclad Aluminum/Vinyl Roof Frame: Gable -Hip Roof Cover: Composite- Shingle 1 Story Floor Finish: Carpet/Vinyl /Asphalt/Soft Wood/Terazzo Interior Finish: Drywall /Plaster Fixtures: 3 Quality: Average Year Built: 1954 Effective Age: 45 Heating: Unit/Space/Wall /Floor Furnace Cooling: None Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 0 Economic Depreciation: 0 Page 2 of 4 View: Units Method 2,046.00 S Open plot in New Window View Floor:. 1 Help http://www.pcpao.org/general—radet.php?pn=l 52 909 2 5 5 42 00 5 045 21 2/5/2007 Property Appraiser General Information: 09/29/15/25542/005 /0452 Card 1 Page 3 of 4 Sub Area Information Description Living Area Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Factor Effective Ft2 Base Area 722 722 1.00 722 Total Living SF: 722 Total Gross SF: 722 Total Effective SF: 722 Residential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value /Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year No Extra Features on Record http: / /www.pcpao.org /general _ radet.php ?pn = 1529092554200504521 2/5/2007 G) U d � ST FAIRMONT 0 MINNIE '10- BECKS 7 e y c 2 2 < BECPCETT ST MARSHALL ST LU GRA NTT � ��U ST s C,bR LTO N 0 ST R�iJr Uj � � J FLASALLE TANGERINE S.P E N G t;1 AN F < ST ST PA Lfj 40 1 5 - SPRmtG C PALM BLUFF ST > ,JIJRGENS ST z PALM j' =7— z CECtA R MEfTO ST O o � t PROJECT SITE � MCHOLSON ST NICH'OLSON ST Ela SEMI NOLE Uj F1 [7-1 ST ELDRIDGE f1 C � h ST Q BPIF Location Map Owner: Penethia Mack Case: FLD2007 -02001 Site: 1040 Myrtle Avenue Property Size Acres : 0.048 Atlas Page: 268B PIN: 09- 29 -15- 25542 - 005 -0452 9 0 d i RM I 11 I I 20 22 24 26 1 1 128 130 o ( 1� 12 1 2 z 1 I `J j I W 15 I � PALM BLUFF ST 16 co >O 12 CG38 39 M 13 1 I RRU 37 40 10 23/04 2 0 0 1 N 1050 R ENS T o 41 8 G 0 — — — 23/05 01 2 1040 N 101 42 > 6 / 1 1 1C - - E 3 1 4 1 5 I 6 108 43 W ,007 I I I I RU - - - - - - �� 0 ti O METTO ST � AA �O 1010 C 2 F51 3 2 X12EDAR ST ,0� CEDAR ST — C 2VZ 6 I? 1 8 g , 8� 30 10 C - - - - PALMETTO ST g 906 4/1 Future Land Use Map Owner. Penethia Mack Case: FLD2007 -02001 Site: 1040 Myrtle Avenue Property Size Acres : 0.048 - Atlas -- -- - -- Page: 268B PIN: 09- 29 -15- 25542- 005 -0452 t MDR 11 ' o 20 22 24 26 ! I 128 130 1 ° O 12 � z z ' 1 t 7 � 1 t 15 16 1012 38 39 ° 13 1 I z 37 40 1010 23/04 2 B Cl) m O N p ,oeo 1 4URGENS N S o loos 41 0 0 0 101 2 1040 +�i N 1� 1 42 I 1 U'C6 E 3 1 4 15 pos Doi 43 0 i� 4 44 d 1070 �3 40 v 4 Z i o CEDAR ST 101 Z CEDAR ST 5 ' 4 I 3 112 o 2� 6 17 ► 8 9 11p0 60 30 10 - ' - - PALMETTO ST 9 N 1) 4/1 gas Zoning Map Owner: Penethia Mack Case: FLD2007 -02001 Site: 1040 Myrtle Avenue Property Size(Acres): 0.048 Atlas Page: PIN: _268B 09- 29 -15- 25542 -005 -0452 Z Q N M I I N (D o sos D 604 I i 40 N I 00 o '�' � 5p sos C� 10 K � 1 I p o I Q g' I I I �' (D Q r $ ) I N n I PJ N (CD 607 �\ cn 00 N j o 609 o N MYRTLE AVE cn N n O Q y y (D 40 W 0 C C)i ° 20 7o01 3 37 25 15 - - - - 79 8 3 -' W 700 o 804 -1 I I p� 5 23/03 U 23106 n m OD CD it —O ��..yy �...� t� W y 23/07809 23/02 'A105 3 CD C� 805 +{ Q N) n A9 n y 20 - o 40 N T 1n rn UG I y � -No( to &ale - Q I 813 f y 80 -Not a Surve� ,.,_, .. �..,.nn r' FT' � •_::.:��"n"P,yx.�++��+'r ?';'"n" .., . ., .. ,.. ., ?�tA�'" Rc?. r�s" �a" x+ Rr, �r+- 6`. �n� ,'p".+.sa;w.zwr¢.ax'+.��g =x+.. 4w,- ��..:a�nww,��.q„�,� _ _ f.6° LU FL— �Im �LL Q zd I tell 'lot Yu't way OPJGINAL RECEIVED [AAR 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER �r 'fir e Lull r 3 vj OPJGINAL RECEIVED [AAR 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 'fir e Lull 3 vj S�F i11 OPJGINAL RECEIVED [AAR 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER i __ -... .yam,.. a�.u.. , �..u�� "..::. � -_ ......;: o *...�w..��da:a3cxams>r.:a:,a�+� <.u•.:�.r.- ,�.a,s.. .,o-,..a.� ..F,. : ".. r.: o: .�a�.:. _ .�_.__. (j _ _ 1 ii i t yysi �+T�g�y�' , —�1y .ra two �0" �m:� �ii TraTi Masai a� }t 1. �' C. t1 itt � .t+ y�1 'M $<e, �'*'f4 '• 3 YYZ°jv�!lt •�+ _ t _ !`:: 09 A K Y .5 vN 9 • •�y 00 0 �- ,. .. :, i � '. ,,yy�� e ., ,- ' . ,. .. ,. .: ..: ,.. 1 y, `!•'� ^_ t� M`� P _ -b` ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMEN- CITY OF CLEARWATE ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMEN' CITY GF CLEARWA?EP . � Tyr 4 �.• , �, r A- ORIGINAL. RECEIVED MAR 15 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMEN' CITY OF CLEARWATEP -.40 RECEIVED MAR 1 5 2007 01 Lkiivinir- ni=PA @Yf A&W, -"k Y .a+1!, er 4 �t ORIGINAL I2ECEWD 15 200 ING DEPT IMEN' OF CLEARWATEP � j'" y u�'. - f f��j e•• A+''�M --� +u 1a• ,aya „� y �Y ' '�y^F �Yh. • ,�� f" a -t�',V .,. Y s/ ,�' t a. �:�,, .�.y pe - a`t i v .n � T W' .- »� ..sv 7ixq „;.rxxt �t ry �agps ; W -�� j. �.,.w'.� Ya5�9"'nC. �+/� u '.� �P'<' ��t+�„�4l''19. � � _, ^T�ti.�3^"+t.�y�• - -. - 4w P�' i '. y ,t .M •� -u. a +•1. ' ice'- ,.. ... ��F - _ h. � }'' .y ._ A xok k 4z V;O_ -W 7.� • 2001 v % -1-NNING FAW WIENT Al w ®RIGINA[- RECEIVED FEB 01 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • r� T�OTD's� 011, PECEIV PER ©11007 Cir, ,GCDEPAR Ttp • • • 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 012001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 0 "1 u - EXISTING HOME 1040 N. MYRTLE AVE. IkI-X_TX_X_X= _X- X -X_X_ -X -X -x I I q PLOT PLAN II SCALE: I " = 20.0' NOTE: EXISTING HOME: FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION = 31.08' PEAK OF ROOF 13.7' ABOVE EXISTING GROUND. SURVEY DATA: FROM SURVEY DATE 9/19/2006 BY GUY D. HALE PLS #4626 W z W W Q W J } FRAMING WOOD - FOR NEW WORK ALL STRUCTURAL LUMBER SHALL BE MARKED AS 5YP C2 ALL WOOD IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH MASONRY OR CONCRETE SMALL BE PRF55URE- TREATED W/ AN APPROVED PRESERVATIVE. - PLYWOOD. ALL PLYWOOD SHEATHING SHALL BE APA RATED SHEATHING AND SHALL COMPLY WITH US PRODUCT STANDARD P51 -95 LATEST EDITION. ALL HORIZONTAL PLYWOOD DIAPHRAGMS (I.E., R001`5 AND FLOORS SHALL BE LAID FACE GRAIN PERPENDICULAR TO JOISTS OR RAFTERS AND STAGGERED WITH THE JOISTS. FRAMING AROUND OPENINGS: TRIMMER 4 HEADER JOISTS SHALL BE DOUBLED, OR OF LUMBER OF E'X:UIVAENT CROSS SECTION, WHEN THE SPAN OF THE HEADER EXCEEDS 4FEET. THE EN05 Of HEAD'.: JOISTS MORE THAN 6' LONG SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY FRAMING ANCHORS OF JOISTS MANGERS UNLE55 BEARING ON A BEAM PARTITION OR WALL. PROVIDE 2X SOLD BLOCKING BETWEEN JOISTS 4 RAFTERS @ ALL SUPPORTS. BLOCKING SHALL BE ONE- , PIECE 4 THE FULL DEPTH OF THE J015T OR RAFTER. CUTTING 6 NOTCHING OF WOOD STUDS: IN EXTERIOR WADS 4 BEARING PARTITIONS, ANY WOOD STUD MAY BE CUT OR NOTCHED TO A DEPTH NOT EXCEEDING 25% Of THE WIDTH OF THE STUD. IN NON-BEARING PARTITIONS, ANY WOOD STUD MAY BE CUT OR NOTCHED TO A OEM NOT EXCEEDING 40% OF THE WIDTH OF THE STUD. BORED HOLES IN WOOD STUDS: A HOLE NOT GREATER IN DIAMETER THAN 40% OF THE STUD WIDTH MAY BE BORED IN ANY STUD. BORED HOLES NOT GREATER THAN W% of THE WIDTH OF THE 51 U ARE PERMITTED IN NON- BEARING PARTITIONS OR IN ANY WALL "ERE EACH BORED STUD 15 DOUBLED. PROVIDED NOT MORE THAN 2 SUCH SUCCESSIVE DOUBLED STUD ARE 50 BORED. IN NO CASE SHALL THE EDGE Of THE BOARD HOLE BE NEARER THAN 5/8' TO THE EDGE OF THE STUD. BOARD HOLES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED @ THE SAME SECTION OF STUD AS A CUT OR NOTCH. WALL5 (NOT OTHERWISE BRACED BY PLYWOOD) SHALL BE BRACED Y4 NOT LE55 THAN IXG DIAGONAL LET -IN5, A MINIMUM OF ONE EACH END Of EACH EXTERIOR WALL NOT'TO EXCEED 25' (Y- O.C. EACH BRACE SHALL COVER 4 STUDS 4 BE NAILED W/ (2) 8D NAILS @ EACH END INTO THE TOP PLATE AND 51LL F (2) 8D NAILS INTO EACH INTERSECTING STUD. USE DOUBLE 5TUD5 UNDER ALL 4X 6 DOUBLE JOIST5.13EAM5, 4 TRIPLE FnJD5 UNDER ALL GX 4 TRIPLE J015T 5EAM5 p5s I b6-1j T-i /-I � / ?Y7� l2� 11�ExJTi6}L. if Ort1E D�Fic� FLORIDA STRUCTURAL LOAD LIMITATIONS (FBC - 2004 Sea. 1603) FLOOR LIVE LOAD: 40 PSF 30 PSI: SLEEPING ROOMS ROOF LIVE LOAD: 20 PSF ROOF SNOW LOAD: NOTAPPLICABLE WIND LOAD: 1. 13ASIC WIND SPEEDS 130 MPH 2. WINO IMPORTANCE, FACTOR, 1.- 1.0 BUILDING C/VFCGORY = II 3. WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY B 4. ENCLOSURECLASSIFICATION: ENCLOSED, INTERNAL PRE SURF-000PFICIF:NT= +/- 0.18 5. COMPONI::N1' & CLADDING _ ROOF: (10 SF) For ROOF ANGLE- - 7 to 27 DEGREES' H= 01.30 FREI P roof- ZONE 1 - 17.5 -27.8 7.ONE2= 17.5 -58.7 ZONE: 3 - 17.5 -58.7 OVERHANG LANE 2 - -56.6 OVERHANG 70NE 3 = -05.3 WALL: (WINDOW'S & DOORS) (IO SF) - P w411 •- ZONE 4 v 30.4 -33,0 ZONE. 5= 30.4 40.7 FIND ZONC.. WIDTH =e= 4 FEET SEISMIC LAAD: NOTAPPLICABLE SOII, BEARING PRESSURE: 2,000 PSF 2004 Florida EXisting Building Code 12005 Supplements 2004 Florida Building Code, Residential !1005 Supplements 2004 Florida Building Code, Mechanical /2005 Supplements 2004 Florida Building Cotle, Plumbing CC05 Supplements 2004 Florida Building Code, Fuel Gas 2005 Supplements 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code 2003 NFPA 1 - Uniform Fire Code 2003 NFPA 101 - Life Safety Code 2002 National Electric Code (NFPA 70) Construction: Type V - B Occupancy: R -3 Residential Occupant Load: 1 person per 200 SF INDEX: SHEET SUBJECT COVER SHEET I.- PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN. 2,- EXISTING FLOOR PLAN. 3.- DEMOLITION PLAN. 4.- EXISTING FLOOR FRAMING PLAN. 5: EXISTING ROOF FRAMING PLAN. G.- . ELEVATIONS. 7.- ELEVATIONS. 8.- ELECTRICAL LAYOUT. 9,- DETAILS il, SECTIONS. ENCLOSED STRUCTURE NOTES: IN UEU OF IMPACT WINDOWS OR AN APPROVED SHUTTER SYSTEM, A PLYWOOD PANEL MUST BE MADE FOR EACH NEW WINDOW AND STORED ON SITE. THE PLYWOOD PANEL SMALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING MNIMUM REQUIREMENTS: MINIMUM THICKNESS: 7110 MAXIMUM 5PAW 8' PANELS SMALL BE PRECUT TO COVERTIIE GLAZED OPENINGS WITH ATTACHMENT HARDWARE PROVIDED AND MARKED W/ DE51GNATION POP EACH WINDOW. 2 1/2' R 6 WOOD 5CREW5 WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 16'. WHERE 5CREW5 ARE ATTACHED TO MA90NKY OR MASONRY/ STUCCO, THEY SMALL BE ATTACHED U51NG VIBRATION-RE515TANT ANCHORS HAVING A MINIMUM WITHDRAWAL CAPACITY OF 490 LB., DOORS MUST BE EQUALLY PROTECTED UNLESS ENGINEERED FOR WIND LOADS. INCLUDING FRENCH DOORS. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS ALL WORK, MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL EXTANT ORDINANCES. STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES, 05MA REGULATIONS, AND CODES IN FORCE BY REFERENCE, LATEST ADOPTED EDITIONS. - THESE DRAWINGS ARE DONE IN COMPLIANCE TO 11HE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES - EXISTING BUILDING WITH 2005 SUPPLEMENTS EGRE55 WINDOW REOUIREMENT5: SHALL PROVIDE A CLEAR OPENING OF NOT LESS THAN 5.7 50. FT. NO LE55 THAN 20' WIDE. NO LESS THAN 24' HIGH. THE BOTTOM OF THE OPENING SHALL BE NOT MORE THAN.44' ABOVE THE FLOOR. ORIGINAL RECEIVED PL G A�P�NIRI . CITY OF( 0 p � r Z Q -1 a> Z. Q �i s Qom %~ Q Q V I Iliam J. McCann, P.L. Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite B / ■� water, Ff. 33755 1�.�- COVES i.S 727. 451 -5500 2. 10� SHEET 727.461 -5502 I J Q Q�aa N Q Q Iliam J. McCann, P.L. Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite B / ■� water, Ff. 33755 1�.�- COVES i.S 727. 451 -5500 2. 10� SHEET 727.461 -5502 I =. a� 241 -011 14' -O" 101 -011 1 m VIS�� 141 -0" 3,-0" 31 011 4' -011 4 3'x3' 2500 PSI GONG. m PAD. U1/ FIBER MESH ---,,, Am 36" RAILING TO EXIST, STAIRWAY ---- C-t ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 012007 EN` PLANNING DEPARTM I CITY OF CLEARWATFP is /Iql�� .11�n 2'4°. 1--3" 2 -4n .414" 24'-0" PROPOSED FLOOR.', PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 11 -01' o � � � O z N 3 A a. A Z . cfI , �Q? Oza aO� // lu d v 1428 Gulf'fo Bay Blvd, Suite E O ON Tel: 727.461 -5500 J Fax: 727 -461 -Pro lorida P.E. License N Q N 03� IQ } 0 �aa WATER HEATER - UNDER 81NK �� 5 111 -119" - 'v KITCHEN °' -r,-A0 r N v rvW3( 9 � a� � 11 AIR HANDLER � B r • Q � Iii N . LIVING 41 -Iw .1.61. j, iN so e 9 II' -6" 17T rr=EDROC'i::.i' 111 -1i9" � Q . � 2-4°x414° 2-4'.4'4 " - s ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 012007 EN` PLANNING DEPARTM I CITY OF CLEARWATFP is /Iql�� .11�n 2'4°. 1--3" 2 -4n .414" 24'-0" PROPOSED FLOOR.', PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 11 -01' o � � � O z N 3 A a. A Z . cfI , �Q? Oza aO� // lu d v William J. McCann, P.E. 1428 Gulf'fo Bay Blvd, Suite E U Clearwater, FL 33755 Tel: 727.461 -5500 J Fax: 727 -461 -Pro lorida P.E. License N Q IQ } �aa William J. McCann, P.E. 1428 Gulf'fo Bay Blvd, Suite E Clearwater, FL 33755 Tel: 727.461 -5500 �1.5212 Fax: 727 -461 -Pro lorida P.E. License N cct k J REMOVI FRAME RECEIVED. FEB o 17001 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATFR iE EXISTING WINDOW ANT ENTRY POOR p O ® OPENING CHANGE � Z EXISTING WALL Q LU (UNGFIANGED) .Q ® NEW WALL ® TO BE REMOVED 72 Ld N WQz Ul (K U DEMOLITION 'PLAN Q � William J. McCann, P.E. 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E Clearwater, FL 33755 Tel: 727461.5500 ZFax: 727461.5502 ORIGINAL RECEIVED. FER ©12007 24--0" PLANNING DEPARTMENT 14'-0° lo'-o° CITY OF CLEARWATER • C r d Q' O = = Ul Rr � w- Q - 4" E.N. EXIST. Dt0 P.t. JOIST - - - b' F.N - 2X8 FLOOR JOISTS '0 EXISTING Q CD nZ - Willi am J. C9nn P.E. FLOOR MAY VAR7WE TO GRADE SLOPE CONDITIONS Z > OfL °°..°c° a c N LU Blvd, FRAMI N PLAN 0 o. d (31mmater, FL 33755 '� r-OOTER DETAIL 1 4 - Pro ect N 06136 Florida P.E. License 0 50252 I I I � I !, lit 1 dli n! I' I� I EXISTING HURRICANE ANCHOR W/ SIMPSON TSIS TYPICAL (EXIST.) REMOVE AND REPLACE ALL _ 1/2" PLY DECKING AND REPLACE WITH 6/8" CDX, NAILED W/ ed'8 C r d Q' O = = Ul Rr � w- Q - 4" E.N. EXIST. Dt0 P.t. JOIST - - - b' F.N - 2X8 FLOOR JOISTS '0 EXISTING Q CD nZ - Willi am J. C9nn P.E. FLOOR MAY VAR7WE TO GRADE SLOPE CONDITIONS Z > OfL °°..°c° a c N LU Blvd, FRAMI N PLAN 0 o. d (31mmater, FL 33755 '� r-OOTER DETAIL 1 4 - Pro ect N 06136 Florida P.E. License 0 50252 FILL CMU 3000 PSI . 2X8 JOISTS 16" O.C. 02 CONC. AND SHIM 1 1/2" 24' -0" 4 (THIS PIER ONLY) pp GI EXISTING Q CD Willi am J. C9nn P.E. FLOOR Blvd, FRAMI N PLAN (31mmater, FL 33755 '� SCALE: N16" = 1' -0" el: 727. 461 -5500 bT Fax: 727- 461.5502 1 4 - Pro ect N 06136 Florida P.E. License 0 50252 r D� m m w rn O -4y o O cn 1 = 3OZ D IrU m O r, A �' z d mnit �E ---------- ---- - - -- --- -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - ----------------- oa o f -5/12 PITCH 9/12 m= PITCH -► z - - - - Z ATTIC ACCESS ------------------ --------------- r 5/12 PITCH ---- - - - - -- Z i y to -(T O. =- r � a a ORIGINAL RECEIVED an a� m p FEB 0.12007 "C i. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER m. N� ..I SCALE DRAWN BY A.L.C. CAIZA�VAN DE ��c; N5 II E TARPON AVE. DATE 1/n /06 REVISED. 1111106 TARPON SPRiNc-ss, FL APPROVED DRAWING0 1236 34689 z E O 8• -0u m � i i zm 03 AO mm D r nr MM X cw R Im 8 -0u I i 1�1�1�1�1�1�1�I 1 ► i�i��i�i�i�i� loll FUN h. 11 F TARPON AVE TARPON SPRIN66, FL. -. 4 1� ORIGINAL FEB 012007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I' -411 Q RAILING PER REMOVE ALL EXIST, SIDING CODE AND REPLACE SOUTH ELEVATION SEE SHT AFC) FOR DETAIL EAST ELEVATION 4 O � � ^oA � C _ z . z o w Q UT z 1w. d V Blvd, Suite C 1428 Guor, u FL 33 Clearwater, FL 33755 l'el: 727461.5500 4 Fax: 727 -461 -5502 �Z Florida r.E. Licen e# 50252 Q _i I� 0 u Q a IIII ORIGINAL FEB 012007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I' -411 Q RAILING PER REMOVE ALL EXIST, SIDING CODE AND REPLACE SOUTH ELEVATION SEE SHT AFC) FOR DETAIL EAST ELEVATION 4 O � � ^oA � C _ z . z o w Q UT z 1w. d V William J. McCann, P.E. Blvd, Suite C 1428 Guor, u FL 33 Clearwater, FL 33755 l'el: 727461.5500 4 Fax: 727 -461 -5502 �Z Florida r.E. Licen e# 50252 Q 0 u Q a William J. McCann, P.E. Blvd, Suite C 1428 Guor, _ FL 33 Clearwater, FL 33755 l'el: 727461.5500 Fax: 727 -461 -5502 �Z Florida r.E. Licen e# 50252 Project# 06136 I0 METER"' A.C. PAMNEL� FF ORIGINAL ----- Er FEB 012007 PLANNING DEPARTIVIENI NOTE: ALL BEDROOM OUTLETS TO BE ON AN ARCH FAULT PRO . TECTED CIRCUIT. CITY OF. CLEARWATER --ijun-vi SYMBOL ceiling fan \�-j vanity bar light WATER 11—R fan ( light UNDER SINK outlet (5 outlet 220v dlp outlet grt & pull cha tn fight II smoke detector j II switch .telephone ------ - --------------- ------------- ELECTRICAL SYMBOL ceiling fan Clca atcr, FL 33755 vanity bar light Td: 727-461-5500 F-: 727 -461 -5502 fan Florida P.E. iccnsc #50252 light outlet (5 outlet 220v dlp outlet grt & pull cha tn fight smoke detector switch .telephone II ELECTRICAL LAYOUT William J. McCann, P.E. 1428 GuIfTo Bay 81W, Suite E Clca atcr, FL 33755 Td: 727-461-5500 F-: 727 -461 -5502 Florida P.E. iccnsc #50252 Project # 06136 �Q a w In Ld 7Z a OT > q a cn rn W. �-0 (2) 2x5 W/ I/2" PLY SHIM NAILED W/ IOd o S" O.C. 2 ROWS. L8TAW SECTION E UPLIFT TRANSFER AT WALL OPNG'S ORIGINAL RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I I\ . EXISTING Clearwater, FL 33755 ' ASPHALT SHINGLES R -19 QRSUI�IFN ER BLOWN IN Florida P.C. Ucrnu 50252 OVER 112" PLYWOOD " 1/2" GYP. SO.' CEILING" i TAPED AND SPRAYEp EXISTING: ALUM DRIP EDGE _ ALUM FASCIA iALUM VENTED SOFFIT (TAPED AND PAINTED' A 718 "CEMENTATIOLIS COATING INSUILI A OVER METAL LATH AND 15 LB .91.0 ' F.F.E- ,I °�t E�VIS�p FELT PAPER OVER EXISTING i i a�14 G CLAPBOARD SIDING,. e• c oECwNe W O eye i EXISTING: CP ERI GWERING W/ede W1 ed e• o.c. W X V2" ANCHOR 90LT sxS P.T, s• o.c. E.N. EN W1 2" W/ 2" WASHER o JOISTS i W eoNbrau S" FROM CORNERS 31.OS EXISTING a SEE EXISTING FLOOR FRAMING � CONC. PIERS I PLAN FOR LOCATION OF (oN SOUTHEAST - EXISITNG FOOTINGS CORNER PIER GRADE. _ - ONLY) SHIM 11/2' 7 . { SECTION15 TYPICAL WALL (2) 2x5 W/ I/2" PLY SHIM NAILED W/ IOd o S" O.C. 2 ROWS. L8TAW SECTION E UPLIFT TRANSFER AT WALL OPNG'S ORIGINAL RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I p r O C r = s Z o w a µ �Q QZ ; (L �� >aQ� wa V Q zlli/o v William J. McCann, P.E. I\ . Clearwater, FL 33755 ' Tel: 727.461 -5500 Fex: 727- 461.5502 �� gG Florida P.C. Ucrnu 50252 Pro'ect b 06136 _z d1 N z p -L-^^ 10" .91.0 ' F.F.E- ,I °�t E�VIS�p a�14 G ECTION p r O C r = s Z o w a µ �Q QZ ; (L �� >aQ� wa V Q zlli/o v William J. McCann, P.E. 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E Clearwater, FL 33755 ' Tel: 727.461 -5500 Fex: 727- 461.5502 �� gG Florida P.C. Ucrnu 50252 Pro'ect b 06136 111 Q s 24' -O" EXISTING FLOOR PLAN O s � 0 c C r p� w Q � o al z �r U- > �z za ZR� dQz O Qw(L � =Q d V m wi I� m IV (j) 0 TA `O O ca O O it SCALE DRAWN 13Y �A Q) M Ui X u u u E 71 to (P -n mro N�z m0 A 9 I= W& Affilifll ■fillA�m� 14'-10" 26'4" 331-01. DATE 1111106 A.L.G. 11 E TARPON AVE. REVISED 111-1106 TARPON SPRINGS, FL A O z `2E 20 U, m A 00 TZ T z —ATnc Ac--Eaq a M �71 Q 4N r3O" L =24.44' 2'8'.V3"j ----------- 26'4" 331-01. DATE 1111106 A.L.G. 11 E TARPON AVE. REVISED 111-1106 TARPON SPRINGS, FL A O z 0 z m r m O z zm 03 A< mm Am br nr mm x N m Dx z� _;Z4 o� AA D z m 0 T im I i N O c z m r m { O z D A z v3 1� o m{ M nr mm X N 4 L N v_ ov m� r Z 0 -0 m 70 0 N m r m D� O z mm r� O A z m E O m � E N' m r m A O z SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 0 W (n Q 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA Boundory Survey PIR 5 /B" LB /2129 / PLSp3747 CERTIFIED TO: TOAI SEIILHORST / LM 132.19' / R= 11404.19' / A= 00'39'51" C LEN = 132.19' / BRG =N 17'36'50" E 1 1 1 e1 L= 32.45' R= 11404.19' i L= 00'09' 47" C LEN = 32.45' BRG =N 17'12'01" E BASIS OF BEARING: ASSUMED OGO x Denotes Elevotlon NAVD 1988 cb q9b Pv w LEGEND PI C • Polnt of Ccmmeneemant FIR - found Iron Rod B Cap bN / 2q / e 2q' x 1, �' E \9_1 C)i �I orn1 PJ o, 0 OI L U d 0 Z m GI E —Lj OI >0 Q In In: 00'00'00" E 31.00' (M) .4, LJJ c[ -4 kA1i CITY ®F , /-1 co W_ Q Q LL O O LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE SOUTH 31 FEET OF THE NORTH 157 FEET OF LOT 45, BLOCK "E ", "JOS. J. ELDRIDGE'S SUBDIVISION" LESS THE EAST 30 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 85 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. FLOOD STATEMENT: THIS LOT LIES IN FLOOD ZONE "X" ACCORDING TO F.E.M. A. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 81210JC 0106H, DATED MAY 17, 2005. P - P,ht of Beglnne, P Data Daeerpllon I SURVEYORS NOTE: Per M - Meoeured Data FOP - Faund Open Ptps A Cap a iJ t - Cdamtea Dma P (e) I� 1 OF CLEARWATER BENCHMARK "H -06" LOCATED ON I R. - pe ent R.f Reference THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MYRTLE AVENUE AND P PB. - Glol boot 8 R - Roma• °v A - De11a An". PL5 - d S La,d ar.+yor DATUM. �) T C)i �I orn1 PJ o, 0 OI L U d 0 Z m GI E —Lj OI >0 Q In In: 00'00'00" E 31.00' (M) .4, LJJ c[ -4 kA1i CITY ®F , /-1 co W_ Q Q LL O O LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE SOUTH 31 FEET OF THE NORTH 157 FEET OF LOT 45, BLOCK "E ", "JOS. J. ELDRIDGE'S SUBDIVISION" LESS THE EAST 30 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 85 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. FLOOD STATEMENT: THIS LOT LIES IN FLOOD ZONE "X" ACCORDING TO F.E.M. A. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 81210JC 0106H, DATED MAY 17, 2005. P - P,ht of Beglnne, P Data Daeerpllon FIP - Isund Ire, Pipe NP -Found Phehed Pp., SURVEYORS NOTE: Per M - Meoeured Data FOP - Faund Open Ptps A Cap ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CITY t - Cdamtea Dma P (e) FCM - F-nd pl C to Point . Monamanl OF CLEARWATER BENCHMARK "H -06" LOCATED ON 0.� Olt Record B,A 00 ,W R. - pe ent R.f Reference THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MYRTLE AVENUE AND P PB. - Glol boot 8 R - Roma• SIR L.S. #4 2 SIR - Set bm A Cap 1/Y L.S. }1828 Set In,n LB - Corporals Call Number FAIRMONT STREET. ELEVATION: 30.6797 NAVD 1988 A - De11a An". PL5 - d S La,d ar.+yor DATUM. R - a %t �of�.,y „' Can t',d cwc . : ce -t. sap GUYHALELANOSURVEKNG DW _Star„ Se-w 4enM1d• MES - MI-ad End Ss I- co : i� tor, _ C,,l " "° 6/W _Sid. -aA Q - CeniMMa ` W : V.I.M" CERTIf ION � TOS - TM 01 9mt ft to, IETE Feiephene SeMCe 1, GUY D. HALE, THE SURVEYOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT T-. Toe of Slaps NV - water Ov GGaet• Vd - -E-- : O,«h-od`�AA« THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREON AND THAT SAID ABOVE GROUND SURVEY AND V L/F - Pete Palo FP rd. FHA - PYa Nydanl A•••mply SKETCH ARE ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL ud,1 - URRIy cr air lne L1EC Peer T.en•re.me. ELEV. . On,atlon STANDARDS IN SECTION 172.027, OPIDA STAR S (OR RULE CHAPTER 61017 -8..., F.A.C.) SURVEY NOT VALID SS SEALED AN 11111 - ED SEAL SURVEY IS SUBJECT TO A TIRE SEARCH FOR EASEMENTS. ' RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD. BASIS OF 1fIOOVERGASHDRIVESU17EC BEARINGS ARE PLAT, UNLESS OTHEP.WISE STATED. NO - UNOERGROtJ"D LOCA" UNLESS SHOWN HEREON. THE SURVEY CUY O. E PLS / 626 DUNED /N, nOR /DA 34M DEPICTED HERE IS NOT COVER.D BY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY - INSURANCE. ,AJB NUM6ER: e'O06701 OA1E c11101:7006 (727)734-41W "(727)734 -,tea .52007 ®EPARgMEW cn cn Q p LiwS MGM L;tK III-ItU IU: IOM SEHLHORST ,ZEG'WD FEB 0 8 2007 (M ) (PLANNING DEPARTMENT L= 132.19' GITY4F C[EA w'ATER R= 11404.19' A=00'39'51" J� C LEN = 132.19' /r BRG =N 17 °36'50" E --� '0 .0 N 4.19' 9'47" 32.45' 17'12'0 1 " E �Q v J O 0 Q C) Q� 0 W r "D Q Q� Q ti Z 1-,� L " �y / EXISTING METAL AND MASONRY / BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR _ ELEV = 29.09' % OJECT ENCHMARK m T BENT 0 "d" NAIL o IN SOUT EAST POND /SWALE SID OF PO ER POLE ELE TION 31.00' oI o N If) i / P —E E— E — E— E— E— E / S 89 °59 8" E 62.00' M s FIR 5/8 0.1' 26.3' 2129 PL S o ONE STORY 0.1 OODFRAME 6 9' ESIDENCE A #1040 W FI (SHED FLOOR EV = 31.08' dO 33.4' FIR 5/8" CONCRETE LB#2129 STEPS PLS#37 1.6 M x— x —CHANX FENCE —x —x —x x— x —x —xl / OTE: / x /' PEAK F ROOF x 13.7' ROVE k EXISTING ROUND X cu VACANT x c AM / X W 4 5 3 w 0 V) W U Z 0 U I wO lz J F- I 0 a 30.0 J Ilk all I� LL C) 0 r I J �FIR 5/8" B02129 — —E- / PLS#3747 2. 1' Q IkA nn �1 �y / EXISTING METAL AND MASONRY / BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR _ ELEV = 29.09' % OJECT ENCHMARK m T BENT 0 "d" NAIL o IN SOUT EAST POND /SWALE SID OF PO ER POLE ELE TION 31.00' oI o N If) i / P —E E— E — E— E— E— E / S 89 °59 8" E 62.00' M s FIR 5/8 0.1' 26.3' 2129 PL S o ONE STORY 0.1 OODFRAME 6 9' ESIDENCE A #1040 W FI (SHED FLOOR EV = 31.08' dO 33.4' FIR 5/8" CONCRETE LB#2129 STEPS PLS#37 1.6 M x— x —CHANX FENCE —x —x —x x— x —x —xl / OTE: / x /' PEAK F ROOF x 13.7' ROVE k EXISTING ROUND X cu VACANT x c AM / X W 4 5 3 w 0 V) W U Z 0 U I wO lz J F- I 0 a 30.0 J Ilk all I� LL C) 0 r I S 00'00'00" E 31.00' (M) 2.3' W I I r \ � I �`z a � Q � U / / x � x � X w L� zI ui x LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE SOUTH 31 FEET OF THE NOR OT 45, fill /l I 1 w — —E- 2. 1' Q IkA nn �1 S 00'00'00" E 31.00' (M) 2.3' W I I r \ � I �`z a � Q � U / / x � x � X w L� zI ui x LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE SOUTH 31 FEET OF THE NOR OT 45, fill /l I 1 w SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA Boundary Survey �FIR 5/8" Bl%2129 / PLS#3747 H ICERTIFIED TO: TOM SEHLHORST / I ° �I w (M) � L= 132.19' I Q R= 11404.19' I A= 00'39'51 " / C LEN = 132.19' I BRG =N 17'36'50" E / 30.00' N I 1t 0 I 0 0' 20' 40' 60' / �Ci��S N t 14 0 » 2q / 21�2b ?A I �Z� R0 2bgb I o 1 = 20 20 Finished x (M) L= 32.45' R= 11404.19' A= 00'09'47" / C LEN= 32.45' BRG =N 17'12'01" E Z� Q O vl 5o O O a c�4 b ,bo• o� o� 0 X Denotes Elevation NAVD 1988 LB #2129 ti 3! 20 a PLS#3747 10 ONE STORY D'1' 2 leI WOODFRAME N X �b 6.9' RESIDENCE ? 2q• #1040 NOTE: w FINISHED FLOOR PEAK OF ROOF ELEV - 31.08' 13.7' AAgyc a0 a• EXISTING GROUND 2y' 33.4' FIR 5/8" CONCRETE— LB #2129 4� STEPS `�T� "u ZgOb PLS�3747 ' " ' a x xc— x— x— / x —x —X —x yt x— x— x— x —x 6' CHANUNK FENCE —x "x 1 Floor Elev: q10 qao < o la PG.(s) Page (s) x O.�K Official Record Book 29.09' VACANT x R - Radius � V / , � 0 - Delta Angie 1 x x q00 2 r' i 3-r-- R/W - Right —of —way CONC. - Concrete Zb as MES - Mitered End Section x INSURANCE. 4 m zq EXISTING k W T a x v x METAL AND tt I z to x MASONRY BUILDING OG\4- Dt� pZ 2^ 0 vO` Zq. 12 ,S9 x N 2g0b Zq�O �11 Project BM: 7 20' 4 V 2 2 I cue Set Bent 60d Zq. k,� �► x ,\. LLJ o Nail in SE / �' 20� r Side of q0 2 G0 Ogb POND /SWALE 2 PowerPole a, Xoyo 2q 2 Z EL : 31.00 tip° Zqg �° 10 1 PP I Al PP — E— @— E— E— E —E —E— _ ° - E - 'sX S 89'59'08" E 62.00' M I �� ,Lb, \W tA2 0� R 5/5" WM ® 0.1' �'9 26.3' S 2.1 / I vl 5o O O a c�4 b ,bo• o� o� 0 X Denotes Elevation NAVD 1988 LB #2129 ti 3! 20 a PLS#3747 10 ONE STORY D'1' 2 leI WOODFRAME N X �b 6.9' RESIDENCE ? 2q• #1040 NOTE: w FINISHED FLOOR PEAK OF ROOF ELEV - 31.08' 13.7' AAgyc a0 a• EXISTING GROUND 2y' 33.4' FIR 5/8" CONCRETE— LB #2129 4� STEPS `�T� "u ZgOb PLS�3747 ' " ' a x xc— x— x— / x —x —X —x yt x— x— x— x —x 6' CHANUNK FENCE —x "x 1 w q10 qao Otiq o 2q 1?; lu x PG.(s) Page (s) x O.�K Official Record Book /x VACANT x R - Radius � V / , � 0 - Delta Angie 1 x 0 q00 2 r' i 3-r-- R/W - Right —of —way CONC. - Concrete Zb 2 MES - Mitered End Section x INSURANCE. 4 m zq x I k x 49 W k a x v x Q� tt to x tu OG\4- Dt� 2bq° 2b01 0 vO` LU x 2g0b Zq�O �11 QI S 00'00'00" E 31.00' (M) 2.3' LLJ I b I r I Z� I U N le- r,\ Li >Q LL- O V PP / LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE SOUTH 31 FEET OF THE NORTH 157 FEET OF LOT 45, BLOCK W "E ", JOS. J. ELDRIDGE'S SUBDIVISION LESS THE EAST 30 FEET FOR / 0 ROAD RIGHT OF WAY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 85 OF q� THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA OF LEGEND POC Point of Commencement FIR - Found Iron Rod do Cap POB Point of BeglnnMy ((R)) Data Description FIP - Found Iron Pipe FPP per (M) Measured Data - Found Pinched Pipe FOP - Found Open Pipe Qc Cap (C - Calculated Data PCP — Permanent Control Point PG.(s) Page (s) FCM - Found Concrete Monument O.�K Official Record Book PRM Permanent Reference Monument P.B. Plat Book SIR Set Iron d: Cop 1/2" L.S. /4626 R - Radius LB - Corporate Certificate Number 0 - Delta Angie PLS - Professional Land Surveyor EP Edge of Pavement CS Concrete Slab R/W - Right —of —way CONC. - Concrete OMH - Storm Sewer Manhole S/W Sidewalk MES - Mitered End Section Centerline X WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART. FLOOD STATEMENT: THIS LOT LIES IN FLOOD ZONE "X" ACCORDING TO THE F.E.M.A. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 12103C 0106H, DATED MAY 17, 2005. SURVEYORS NOTE: ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF CLEARWATER BENCHMARK H -06 LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MYRTLE AVENUE AND FAIRMONT STREET, ELEVATION: 30.6793 NAVD 1988 DATUM. &IYH&EL4ND SURVEYING `4 1.t SMH - Sanitary Sewer Manhole CTV - Cable Tv Service CO - Sanitary Clow Out WV - Water Valve CER T /F /CA T /ON. �' ' Toe - Top of Bank TELE - Telephone Service TOS -Toe of Slope GV - to I, GUY D. HALE, THE SURVEYOR IN RESPONSIBLE CI }AR E. HEREBY CERTIFY'AHAT. THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREON "ABOVE wu - water Meter - -E m L/P — Llaht Pole FHA - Fire Hydrant Assembly PP AND THATy,5.AID' GROUND'.SURVEY AND ; SKETCH ARE ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE � P�'ND BELIEF. I FUR1HERa„ - U my Pole ELEC - Power Transformer ow CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS THE MINIMU�1,, TVCHNICAL $7ANDARM IN SECTION -Guy were ELEV. - Elevation 472.027, IDA STATUTES ( RULE CHAP TE 61G17� t' l6 >.I C.) `�l1RVEY �IQTO ••, ": SURVEY VALID UN EALED TH OSSED SEAL . -.t IS SUBJECT TO A TITLE SEARCH FOR EASEMENTS, RIGHTS–OF–WAY AND OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD. BASIS OF - •,• "� 4 fff0ovmr4SHDRIVESUITEC BEARINGS ARE PLAT, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. NO ,• • UNDERGROUND LOCATED UNLESS SHOWN HEREON. THE SURVEY DEPICTED HERE IS NOT COVERD BY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY �q GUY D. HAL LS 4626 � <_ '"� ' / •``�" Y DUNED/N, FLORIDA 34M INSURANCE. _• ,aB NUMBER.• 2006141 DA7E'.•911912006 k' ` "y (727) 734-4M 64X(727) 734 MM8 i ORIGINAL RECEIVED r -R 012007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT r-iTv OF CLFARWATER ice s Co u ?- 'rr o F?orr scNooc C a o ;ex 1.3 vze W/ OAJON �o j UZI BL /Sh�s Co c/T 01* N O J iry or ✓UIM rr t � r ';7e -&INCV /Ya IYICH L.JOfV sj- only H,7VR77S 0 ST. UA11 'U G TS TRO61ron B2, wl*4� 60 h l Ty 0. EAVEI�CiRo e. �CIIR ,d CULTIV. WILD L. SWAMP SUBDIVI rHE/Pi 'U G TS TRO61ron B2, wl*4� 60 h l Ty 0. EAVEI�CiRo e. �CIIR ,d CULTIV. WILD L. SWAMP SUBDIVI i �..• � ' �t` 'r` _ .ice ' � T far Al • q Ai i 17 ``ate t ►" ! its'• laww• •Aa .. d. ;,,�, r ON / ....�dmwAu 4 i� NIL f�► •� ►I� mil / /�� IWO , A! 11, JAFRI- • 0 w 100 .� . Mme• ... ,.�.�. or • • son y, FA AV I WWA t, F -10, A VA 0 j ,, +Bi ! i :�.!►1� CA ILA i �� I1r OL I/ .:� RL 4. m 19t OWN S E DRIVE v- . .......... V, Aj j R tQ ir qI TI r � y P-7 TI r � y 11 V i T Ii, i/r .sw fir•'- I=+ —T - . - • ;i 0141 % ND STRUCTUR&S � ZHERFFOR �EGL�AE "11W1 , � CIE AR ATIDA , CREATING S RI 0 T , IT OYLAND T N OF BUILDINGS I�TG THE IN7. E Y OF USE A �ExS AND SHE LOCATION AND EON EST�� ►R� -SHING BUIUDING LINES, PROVIDING A DF r ION, AN) PROVIDING IDINi� PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLA- _ . , AT -0 ION OF THE - TERMS OF THIS ORDIN AN CE0 WHEF,]AS, The City of Clearwa- ter Is ifithorixed by Section 79 of the Cit,' 0harter a. amended by Chapter l ill71 (No. il), Acts of the for 1931,+ to regulate and restrict rthe height. n'unber and Etories of build- ings am([ ether- structures, the per- centage of .ota that may be occupied. the size o! yards. courts, and other open spat es, the density of popula- tion, and she location, and use of buildings, etruettires. a-nd land fer trade. ir.•tustry, residence or other uses, for tl-e� purpose of promoting the health, t afety, morals and gen- eral welfare of said City by dividing the City ini -w districts or zones of such number, population and area as it may deen best. and for such pur- poses appoint a City Zoning and Planning ' .oard to make sug- zestions ar I recommendations unto the City Cu nmission for carrying out such intent .ons. NOW TT.ERFFOIc :I :, BE IT OR- DAINED 1Y THE CITY CO'i'IiS- SION OF THE CITY OF CLEAR - WATER, FLORIDA: Section 7. This Ordinance shall be known aid cited as "The Zoning Ordinance of 1939 ". Bectior T. (a) DEFINITIONS: For the purpose of this Ordinance, certain te-m.: and words ar.s here =. with deftied as follows: Words used - in the present tense include the future; words in the sing- ular noml;eer include the plural and words in the plural number. include the singular; the word "building" in- rtntie■ the word •fatructure ": the Street: A permanent tight -of -way or thoroughfa.ft not less than thirty (30) feet wide. Structure: 1. thing nonstructed or eroded, th - use of ,ihich requires more or teas pernaneit location on the ground or atlaehett to something having a permeuent Itcation on the ground. Yard: An open spate on the same- lot with a bedding, y }occupied and unobstructe(i from the ground tit )- ward, efcF . as othe.wist providod In this vi u1nance. Yard, Front: The minimum hori- zontal distance between the street line azd the front lit -x of the build- ing cr any projection thereof ex- ciudiig steps and unei ^Iosed porches. Yard, rear: A ya-d, unoccupied exce%)t by an acceaso•y •huilding as hereinafter permitte,., extending acr(As the full width if the lot be- tveen the rear line of the building Pnd the rear lot lint. Yard. Side: A yard between the Nilding and the side L'ne of the lot a.nd extending from '_he street line ,o the rear yard. SECTION II (b) jL,%F,FI:`'ITIONS, :'ONTINUd.D : Notice: Where notice, is required by this Ordinance to be given. it may be given actually or by deposit -of written notice in the mail to the last known address of the person re- quired to be notified, (.r by adver- tising in any daily newspaper regu- larly pnblh�hed in the City of Clear- water for two (2) consecutive publi- cation days. Person- Shall include corporate and other• legal entities, their officers. pa,; of the main huilding. ST.CTION VI. LSF REGULA- IJISETICT -all li to ' pren ices and buildings except as othe, wise provided in th.s Ordinance, may be used for any ut a permitted In ( ether "R -1" Residence District, "R -2,' 'Multiple Dwelling District, or for my other use not specifically prohibited by Federal or State Lawn or b;• Ordinances of the City of Clearwater, Florida, except the fol- lowing, to-wit: 1. All types of occupancies from which are emitt_ -tl smokes, fumes, gasses or odors derimental to the comfort, enjoymt nt and health of surrounding persons or occupni ts. 2 New or used au _omobile parts salt -s from vacant lots. 3. Creosote treatment or manu- facture. 4. Distillation of bones, coal or wood. 5. Fertilizer 'Manufacture. R. Fish houses. N holesale, also fish smoking, curing or processing plants. 7. Gasoline filling o-- service sta- bons, except where special permit has been secured from the Citj Commission. Such special permi-. may be refused whenever, in th( opinion of the City Commission, th. proposed gasoline filling or servlc, station would undaily increase fir( hazard or eraffic congestion, or en- danger the safety or general iYe•i- fare of the City of Clearwater. R Lumber yard anti /or mill w(,rk plant. 9. Automobile trailer camps, ex within the thousand (IMO) feet of any exi•rior boundary line of the 'Municipe' Aviation Field to a height in excess of .fifty (50) feet. 2 In all residential districts, no garage, tent or outbuilding shall be erected it used for residential pur- poses a :eept construction of the main b,, ilding. 3. No bill boards, posters, diree- tionnl, of other advertising sins Ehfzll be l.r•rmitted in any "R' or "P" Distr; A. No billboa-ds, posters, directional. or other advertising signs shall be. permitted in any district within the r-onfines of the City of Clearwater West of the line of Duncan Avenue extending North and South. Bill- boards, pos, ers, directional or other advertising signs may be permitted on property upon wt hfch the business advertised s located. when same is located in i "B", "'M" or "P" Dis- trict anti vhen the said sign com- plies with general construction and location provisions hereinafter set forth, to-wit: 1. Perso is desiring permit for the construction of billboards, posters, directional or other advertising signs shrill first exhibit to the Building Inspector valid title to or lease upon the lands on which they desire to erect sated sign or signs. 2 All billboards must be at least sip: (6) feet from any existing or hereinafter constructed building. All billboards must be at least fifteen (1 5) feet from any street line or fifty (M) feet from any street intersection. .. _. . _. Secretary who shall take the Minutes' an,l keep the records of all meet• ings of the Board and of all actions of the W—rd. 3. The Board shall have full right ; and power to adopt rules and reg- ulations f(.r its governance, fix its regular and special meeting times in accordance vith such rules, A major- „ ity of the n embership of the Board attending; any regular meeting or special meet.ne shall constitute .e. •w quorum. SEXTION XVI. AD'fINISTRA- TION : It shall be the duty of the City Building Inspector to administer and enforce the provisions of this Ordl- nance, the vamp to be done in con- junction with the building code of the City of Clearwater. In case of a conflict between any of the pro- visions of this Ordinance and those of the building code, in a given in- rtance, the more restrictive of the two shall govern. Persons, fi, -ms, or corporations de- siring to apreal any ruling of the Building Insp• -ctor shall so notify the City 'Tanager of the City of Clear- : step in writing within twenty (20) clays after such ruling has been made. SI•:('TION XVII. BOARD OF AD- ' Jl'cT'.%lMNT AND APPEAL. The City Commission of the City of Clearwater shall, from and after tide pwisage of this Ordinance, be and it is hereby declared a 13onrd .•t :\dj :st►nent and Appeal so that when, there are practical difficulties or rnneeessary hardships In the way of tarrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this Ordinance, the For ae purpose of this Ordinance, certain te-m.: and words ar..- here with defiled as follows: Word,c teed -in the present tense include the future ; words in the sing- ular nomlter include the plural and words In the Iflural number. include the siltgulbr; the word "building" In- cludes the word "structure" • the word "other" shall not be limited to things of 1,1milar character; the word "lot" incl ides the word "plot"; the wordy "me" and "occupy" include the words "d -e"ned ur intended to be Occupied"; the word "shall" Is mandatory and not directory. Aceasscly Building: A subordinate building -3r portion of main buddUM, the use of which i! Incidental to that of the main building. 'Ac:cesiory Uses: Uses customarily dncic ent to the principal use of build - ins• )r T16t an.:lermitted or restricted by tie itrincipal '*ass. , Al vY : A way +esignated to public use Othee than R ;btreet or ,place. AIS�rtm int ; . Hoge : A buildin wh!trtl is rsed or intended to to u as ft h(,thp or meldence fdtr' m !•® "h{ti twW ihmillew ,t-fiUrg in m, to q?llb 3 • ' A 'irdtature -ted a .d <or ub ed " g Ar wholly tei>5i- attaw•.hed e•• occupied e ,tray Ue t{ri'ett :ti•u,a„.� .-t u, 1 of written notice in tee mall to the last known address of the person re- quired to be notified, c.r by adver- Using in nny daily newspaper regu- larly published in the City of Clear- water for two (2) consecutive publi- cation days. Person: Shall include corporate and other legal entities, their officers, repr ^scntntives and agents. SECTTON IiI USE DISTRICTS: 4 For the purpose of classifying, reg- ulating and restricting the location of trades. industries and other uses. and the location of buildings erect- ed or structurally altered for speci- fied uses. the City of Clearwater is hereby divided into districts, of which there shall by six known as: (R -1) RF.STDI:NC'F. .)TSTRTCT. (R -2) MITLTYP1,E D`' RTIMNO DISTRICT. (B) B1151NF.SS DISTRICT. (M) MAI UFACTURING DIS- TRICT. (UZ) UNZONED DIFTRICT. (P) PUBLIC DTSTRTCT which said districts, together with their boundaries, are shown in full upon a certain map marked "1939 i Zplain p of the Ciq of Clearwa- �' > 1q a' • signed bl the Maypr- City ,Ludifor and Cib r_ d 3t`ed Nlo.; 115; yc*nii,es or :► n unit ing sail be occuplyd .«.(end no building _1- lie II by ` hereafter erected o- s`rit •turai al- } Lana<lrifss. . . -t• oi.t.':,fe A beiiiiA!• —Ub i r, 1'" �W4i or hexigtn � -* _-' • ' yes pt� , llll�o! ,id9 y i • t nu)..ntl- ..riV r: _ i- Vr:'lil;,•: Or -e ^t . ►ore persons oc- t[ipOng: e; pret, .wr--• 'Ing as a single _ king eowtng, unit � rd doinir their - .t•t R''.8. + 0&rages -a SArtrrrent :. An accessory with atora!q capacity for i t snore "than 'sou.• self- propelled Ave seise and - •tralie fii" attachable thereto, the second .door or other pottlon OY the butldtr.t beir g designed f^r *( rnnt a .bran oft( «r��for�th 9't- Pl • Aate. J building ure,i hlcles and "trR'l' of Be -)rope] led l �- r;` to, in which bnildT g habbe� ^ere- service or industry r•nnr %A�- 1 orrect- r lY or lndirect:v with m.tor vehicles As carried on. (gage. :tilt,.. .:ay premises ex- "Pt thus- dear, +:� as a private grtraXe U! ".A for t r. storage or care vt ,sb1i -p: + i•t.,lled v abides an,l 'i r:, H- ers" attttcliahlP th.+reto, or where any such .vehicle• i re equipped for of er- ation, repai -et-i or kept fo: rt none a- ti6n, hire o- sale. Garage, 4t, rage: Any premiso-F ex- cept those aescribed as a nrivafe or nublle c-tr .ge used Pzcluslvely flee the stora of self-propelled ? . J!n' •e' . r I .,r, ••trntier!r•• at'. :... ,hoe thereto V y nth. -r.; ]col , trovi.;.-t._ ' this l OP rtaitls l►CP.. ' teX W rt►k r {'sir nnQ at � ry the estat- 1 i leaned but (ling 1!res ar I three (3) feet from an, at it-, all It Utter.. - 2. Acct-? ;nor ,r bt ilrltnn.... including I one prix► to garage w'•en located tti not less i.•ili slaty (ut:/ 'vet from the fron, Alit line, no.- !Gs than twenty -f ve ,25) feet from any oth- er sir-•, L line or three 3) feet fro(.; a i, y and all lot 11 es. or a privat.• garage construt -ed as a ],art of the main buikliri - �. t'SF. 1FG1LT1.A- i,T \(; --t IT- . uftiple Dtv.11ing Dis- tricts no premises or h •rift^ : <A, + +u' be used or ooertaled an no building "I"ll l,e hereafter erec °d or struc- tnra"y altered, unless oti- erwise pro - %*.,It•,l in this Ordinance, except for one or more of the follov .•fig uses I. Any lisp permitted n an "R -1" Resiflence District. y 'rlvo famil dwell.-igs• ,. Ci „.+.•h..o schools. ;elementary and hush), hospitals• except hos- hitals or homes caring for mentally deranged persons or nervous dis- orders. private clubs, except those till. e h ,. if ac tivi v t of -r hick Is a serve <,• customarily cFrrled on as a husiness. libraries, r ruseums, in- stitntions, of an ed•�ratlonal or opinion of the City Commission, th- proposed gasoline filling or servic? station wo -Id unduly increase fire hazard or irafflC congestion. or en- danger the safety or general lvt•1- fare of the ('ity of Clearwater. .R Lumber ynnl and /or mill work plant. 0. Automobile trailer camps, ex Sept where special permit has bee., procured from rile City Commis- sion. following a recommendation by the Zoning ion rd. 10. Carnivals, tent shows, exhibits and other temporary amusement projects, except where special per- mit has been procured from the Citv Commission. SH,<;TIOI\T �'1I. TTSF RF.GT'T,A- TIONS, "M" 11T ;Ai<T -T, AC:TITRT`C n e "M" M.%nufac`urtng District. Il premises and buildi:gs, excNat as herwiae provide] in th ;s Ordinance. ay be used for any use permitter]' 1 • "R -1" Resident- District. "R -2" I iple Dwelling District. "B" Busi-District, or fcr factories, lum- yards. fertilizer ; -1lants, and nthJ ndustries that rr.ay lawfuli, ed on within tle ty U�rits Q' L er. prosfft they do ad fumes, 0. 01, 060 Wra++na *r_ 1 IW ” P" Pima tfliixtrict q ,V lusi"ly ;or ttJ_e folhifai ll i a d. t,E Wwl - : - i Public msSs.t�rv+ . e typs. . �2vTw ia t ►t . s. Aae�y . P16. l lv—�- ..*►qAi -e 7tvlRttoi1 -'teldx. gM.► t _�inrses t:rse',ail ftPlda, other ath tic f}eld-4. lathing heachas• antrrsP .rnt hark. rec: ea i inn: i eenters aliways (other than treet rai.- ays), p1-,a•s of scenic• ,,Panty ea,- ulated to att•act visit„r> and tour- � ts. , :CTTON X. NONCON FORMTN i yTtte TWw..u' use of hint. exist- I ing at thF. - time of the passage of this Ordinane• , althorigh s:ich use doe+ lot ennf,rrr: to the provisions %•••r••.,f, retie be et- ntintied, hilt if suf•h non:,nrormine us, is +.ne,l for a p,riod --rf sic (r) months. t'ien any furtoer its•P of maid premises shall he in ,onformlty v;ith Me provisions of i this Ordinancp. '1•re la•vtt:1 n_e of :t huilding exist- ir lit 't:,• tint.• of the pnssagp of this Ordinance. r:r one for the f•nn- -tr•n,•ti ,n ,•f w ]tic i a i,- ,iidine p,•rntit has bean issne,l not mere than sixty i 41. vs prifor t sut•l: p:,ssaee, may � } e con - ;nut- -d. n l t oough such use does not c ,onf -rrm v ith the provision. h,•rP- 0 f rt f 1 suril e e rn h e ' P at x n dd t}: r,• reboot tt- botildir.s, afro,tnrnl lilt- -rations $Crept those eetirrir•,1 I) V or ordinnnt_,• :r r,• they desire to erect saut sign or signs. All billboards must be at least (t;) feet From any existing or hereinafter constructed building. All billboards must be at least fifteen (15) feet from any street line or fifty (50) feet from any street intersection. 4. Xll billboards must b:� so erect- ed that they will not constitute a tr,ffic hazard or be to eyesore. ,ill billboards must be erecte,l of fireproof maters tls of such str-ngth as to resist •,n eighty (90) mile an hour wind Velocity. R, '.'he advert'sint area of airy billboards shall nn• be more than three :lnndred (3(><) square feet in area. 7. Prins and spvclf]cations for the constr,ietion of 'jillboards shall be first submitted :o the Building In- spector and a T- trmit procured from him b?fore the same or any part thereof is ere:ted. 8. B llboards shall be siibject to periodical ins^tection by the Build- ing inspector who shall have sole autJority to • determine whether or - not ?the same complies with eondi- tiort* of this Ordinance. 9ECT'OW XTII. CERTIFICATE >r ,.T PAJCT : sit. one, shall be .1t4uAtd- of C1 trwater shall, from and after the pazsage of this Ordinance, be and it is hereby declared a Board ,of A,i,'.:sttnrnt and Appeal so that where there are practical difficulties or rnnecessary hardships in the way I of carrying out the strict letter of I the provisions of this Ordinance, the Board of .Adjustment and Appeal shall i have power in specific cases, after dtie notice. and investigation, to de- termine and vary any such provi- sions is harmony with the general purpose and Intent of the Zoning t-irdinrnce so that the public 9ealth, safety and general welfare m.ly be sect:re and subatn.ntial justice done. Such Board shall hear appeals from the action of the Building Inspector an•] determine the rights of the appli- car:t. Appeal to the Board of Ad- justment and Appeal may be taken by, any person, firm: or corporation ,pogrieved provided notice thereof, to- _ -,gether with grounds thereof. are filed in triplicate in writIrg wit}• the City Manager of the City of C tear - water within twenty (20) days after :� such action of the Bu•.dding Inspector. The City Manager shall torthwith transmit one copy thereof to the City Building Inspector aid one copy to th said hoard ;fail after d11c notli- file B rilj�ut tt3 `iUttill the b► &C `' Linn •• � . .. >. taf►rt ,th abrll h we N en eom- K►1eit'e: in trios• y witia the prove- slclns oil tl.t r•�* itltrtio>5s. Pestling _ j Ga,a,to t. eti d ,Y.. ,filar Ctrl +rL'lc.•a.Le _ a tetRlptifa't i[rr.i'i ;r,te u. OcCUf3anr'Y Seeding slit rnontlf d+irl -aeL the com- nle-tion of alt••ss'rt#!t na or during par- tial oet•ur+gStC3"`' ,f 3 bull•ling pendine dtc completion. : tch temporary cer- titicate shall not • +e construed as in ;,nv W:ry a!tering t :fights drtilp- or obligati, is of the owners or of the Citv rs--L• Ling to the Ilse. or lot-( i.:: n: j .,i '1'- r i„ rutlt+att of atiy ,other mutter co• gyred by this OT-11- nancp. end such temporary certifi- cate snnil not he ..]sired except under s:u•h rrstrictinns ant! provisions as "''" oft 'rluatPly tisur • the safety of the netiipants. C'••: t irate of .lecup:,.ncy for T,nnd ►riff.tP list - Ccupanr•y for tli? use n :.,•ant ;a11" or the change in the I h:t t':r, tPrt of err nsP of land rs hpre- in - an, leld. Q,all be apolfed for hP- f,ore any sr h land shat) he nccti_ r,iefl or used and a certificate of "ecitn:lnr•y aha 1 he lssup,l. within the• • (�) dTV. after the nnpliention ! ha. been tnad provided such use is in eonf"Drmlty with the prat,'slnns of r}t,..,, regiil:,i:• nos. t'• rtifit>ELtP �+ or+eupancy shall stnto that the hr 1-1 -1r. ,rr hi' .-,, nce,l fr.-• , -f :i bufltli.re of sand. enmplles with i :ell the hufidine and health Inn's and #tetw �`>q i4 or of her - *r.*qv + rt iitftL r ti- t v CiI �1rOYtfaB(] qi this Ordinance •-)n " ated ti stated poi-it re ruom restric ive fan rPgulatfo-ts on the aalr•e p(.r•t H contiired -',s any other law or •dinance. oP f °- t . Hdt,Ons uv deed ,. subdivl++fon ' n �' " i1f,�tr!•-ts, the• pr vislons of. 11 is `dinanCP a •,, -o •e, i he reirulatf)ns o.' the other law •finance o.- rest Actions in any "E • Intrfet nre irinre restrictive the one of th's Ordinance, the *the. all govern. 81,CTION XIX. REPEAT.. 411 ordinances or parts of ordi- t►atnes Its conrtict nerewith or in- cojjs)stent with the provisions of thl-- O =dinance re h ereb y rPpeale d. 1 V A LIDITY : :'TItN XX. Should any sPctr',n, paragraph. sen- te nce, phrase, clanst or other part or provisie n of this ordinance be b>' the Cotirt tr, be invalid. the same sh:tl, not affect the validity r`f t`le Ordinance as a whole, or any part •hereof, other than the part le- (I:trefl to he in•:alid. N'U. PRNALTY: -any nerson, ar persons, firm or corpeornrlon -;r assoelatfon of persons. «hn shall violate or fail to comply with any of the terms or pr,visions for this nrflinanre shall, upon ennviCr tion in till linnieipal Court, he flrip.i rtnt exceefl in,: the sum of T'cs•t► ITun- '.r T?• il:e ; _M.(N); or itnpri::, -ne,] in till• Ci .Tail for not exceetding ixt }- (11-0) lot's, or by both such ••, e'1`_5 .�%%_•7Ii�,Z� - c -.�..- -•-gib �i''"a+'= •w� • .has ' 1 tlP8if�,• i�t�M•" a; �S pia: ed wlthilf the ea�b,�.; •� �..� -- Itched bus ding linen ar 1t three •pernanso feet from any anti alt �T sloes. (a) Prat ± Hot as a atlfggIs* ; "4�. Accer sort'- 'bvlldh*.�-including if t set dola)t ttletr*.- one priv► to garage w ten located Y "a� stdS. i• not less .'s.-An sixty (6u jo 'cat from i - rtdAt n accessory• the front lot line. no,- ass than r Ito capacity for twenty -f've =) feet from any oth- �'' Lr. n %tbu self-propelled ' er' btrerc line or three ,3) feet `•; :- '9'tntile attachable from any and all lot 11 • ll or a oor or other private garage construtD at ..& ' 'f •1 ► iO° beis~g design -ed part �,f the main buildi more 'than one bm -moN V. Us" IEGULA- Prf .. �e :ora$ve o! A� bnildf utietj LTN( ;R• -2 L- a" ••trailers••" 'WOpel1 ve- � rtn"� -e - • 1ple Dwr ling Dis- • • aiE. hable there- 1 tracts no premises or 1Wfn3 Wattle which boaelirir • buN ►i" be used or or eiop!ed &i ! ono building or lndratry tong t"u w Shall be hereafter exec !r1 or strue- t7 la ireecy with miter vehicles tum!!y altered, unless of" -erwise pro- _ v.ded In this Ordinance.-.except for gs mot. premises ex- ! one or more of the follot%tg Uses: e - desc.w as a private 1. Any use permitted n an 813t-1" s d.• %"±'; �a ueld for tii storage or care . --at +ctrl! -D=s lied vshfcles and "trail- Residence District. attii� able thereto. or where any 2• Two family dwell nCs• c :,.., ` 111th vehfelt� ire equipped r hni -ba• mh ou. .elementary 1,:,� j rs • q pped for oter- and high), hospitals. �tcept hoa- . repalted or kept for remune-a- Pitals or homes curing f.r mentally •.' ,,,tA..: , n. hire o- gala. deranged gi : ft -r"aSe : Any premlaef ex- persons or ) ervous dis- f !: ft9t those described as a orders private clubs. except those f lfttblie private or the chief activity of -fhich is a the atoll of selfpropelledvvehiclea service customarily escried on as anti trar,tars►• attachable thereto. a business. libraries- tiuseums. in- Hotel: .-L building occupied as 'he J Philanthropic of an educational or more or less temporary abode of 'n- l philant lti plc nature. dividustis wh,) are lodged watt or ( houses, dwell use. apartment without meale. and in which :here houses, boarding honsls, and lodg- are more thEn ten sleeping rooms. Inc horses. usually otcrn!ed singly, and v • pro- '• Parks, community 4)u and areas vision is made for cooking to any used for community ir7tin . individual room or apartment. A f=r•tcultirral. tats rifns. truck fudging iI -,lase : .s, but ding other gardening. nurseries. rind green - than a hoiei where ioi %ing for five heit.e, for s onagatlni• and cultl- or more pr rsons is provided for v Stine; plants only. eompensatir•n. 7• Customary home .iccupation lo- rAt and carried on only by members of ' A t•arcel of lead occupied or cated in a dwelling or apartment. r,., ' p occupied by s building and its the household or the ACCea`or' bufId-* ilea, together with copying such person oc such )IOV'" ,,Pees as are required un- ; ment as his elwtslllni e a prt- de- this e.r-' nance. and having Its privet_ residence pres- rr nct I f -.,nta a upon a street or or s no window or other dt square i p "' g or sign cxceedinR two (2) square tticialP- appro+votl place. feet in area be used to advertise Non -c nforaeing Use: A building or i such occupation. l�n % •-- •c:tpieet by a rse that does not A. A public din:nr: room nr - estau- cor 1-fth the r- Aulstuons of tile rant. provided thU samP is ' OCatPd T,triet in whit(, it is situated. within the building operated as a Pir e: An open unoccupied space f hotel. apartment i:ouse, it_riaing ntt: s #.qh tha•• thfr#,y (3 se 0) feet wide. hor or boarding bowie. and pro- f er- ftl,..ntly reserved for prrposes of vided further that no street. win- 1 ar c) abutti Postos• abutting property. , dew. or exterior sign for dlsplav Jos • An advertising sheet for exceeding two (2) sniiare feet in QiS'boardmOr t structure. stake, tree. I area be. used to advertise the name. St..ry ther similar meth u. 9. tccesnory bnildings and u-es ing ir.••Is•decbdt portion of a build- i ,eU :narily it ^(dent t0 anv of the -"tw _Pn the surface of a ve uses. r. hen located -m boy floc .'• the surface of the tiOer next s -boy:. the or if surface be he ' s e► lot anti not fnvolvin: the floor ext 9 it. xt i conduct of a business other thaA ' t•� r such floor . the state be- i , rUtttnr.ar!ly carried on by nanrt- I • ceiling next mP•,ts. hospitals. etc.. lnclu -tines abovs' it. / rrtvate and storage jrprRjt'e"s when • bitos7 -calf: A story findtr • gable. ' :ocatPd not less than sixty ((iii) j 1►fp Or f; ,vr, bret ro.,e, tie. wall -sates feet from tl,.- frt.nt lot line, nor o. which 6n at least two opp ' less than twenty (2ol feet fn)rn ex•Prfor wal,- are not more than :sriv other street line or three ('I tw , !2) fee. aLove the nc-nr of suer. feet frn,n Rnx and all lot lines., . ) er pry, it a private carr,re constructed as a f j • 16 i s - es." Ease'an it =tfealds.� other " atK '. ffelde. •bathing beach Ps, amuse park. recreationri centers 'Sys (other than , treet rnf.- . places of scenic oeauty ca,- t to att ►act visit4ix and tour. ,WN X. NONCONFORMING x ff ure of • lance exist - !1D at th time of the passage -of khis Ordinance. although Bach use sloe Utica conform to the provisions I -erro , niny be ce ntinued. but if such nonconformine use Is dlst�;rrt!r,red for a period of six (a) months. then anv further use of .aid premises shall be in 4onformity with the provisions of thfa Ordinance. The lawfUi nee of a building exist- ing at the time of the passage of this Ordinance, or one for the con - strurtian of whica a building Permit has been issued not more than sixty (PO) d:.ys prior t.► such passage. may he continued, nithough such use does not conform with the provisions �fiPre- of, and such i!se may be extended throuRhotit the buildinir prow? -r'. nn structural alterations except those required by :aw or ordinance are ntatle therein. If no structural alter- ations nre made a nonconforming use of a building may be changers to an- other nonconforming its ,-, of the same or more restriete,l claasiffention. Any nonconforming building, dam- aged by fire. the elements or other Alt of God. to the extent of morr- than sixty -five (tvs) per cent of its value shall not be rer.aired or re- built. except In e•onformity with this Ordinance. Should the dar -rage be less than sixty -Mo (M) per cent of Its value then repairs may be made• provided they he mane within sic (6) months after such d image. nn -i in accordance with all other ordi- nancen of the City of Clearwater. S F. C T T O N XT. LOCATTONS. ttrie:rTT AND ARP,.% RFC;j'LA- TTO 'S : I. NO building or ure shall extend beyond the building 'Ines shown on the 1931) Zoning ::ao o' th.. Ciiy of Clearwater. 2. The heir-ht of a!! hull -fings shall he governed by the City's building code and other pertinent or- linances or regulations, 3. No lot or plot having an area of less than five hundred (:lead) square feet shall hereafter be use,l for buildings in - -R -1" or --R -2 -- areas, neither shall any building other than accessory building be hereafter erected thereon having a ground fl sor enclosed area of !d-ss than three hundred (3.1)) square feet. SF "i'lo N' XIT. GENERAL PP.O- gir,•'s; 7. No Building or structure •rf anv kfad whataoever shalt be er• -eted ceeaiag fhb � �eom�- �' Pletion c�,,W"14urfnja onduring-par- tial occu, bull -ling pending ite completldkr 4% *h temporary cer- tificate sd �floR tth construed as in anv way , resoeztive rights. deities or obilptis - of the owners or of the ..rel#tfng to the use or .xcut:np�y "ua :��•, yaemAmm or any' -,ther mlitte� co led by -this Ordf- nance.i end, such temporary certifi- Cate slfr►ll I%-be7frmed except under Such { strl onp and provisions as wi!t sub- quatelT nsurt the saoty of the oupanta. ' i Cert e�ate ,ot 'OrcupaWY for Land: CPrtif. ate o upaney for We use of vi.can js or_ t!!a cleanse in the eha"ete' of riss of land ra here- in prtivitled. h1l be applied for be- fore any su h land shall be occu- pied or deed ,and a certificate of f nccupdney shat be issued. within three M. ) day, after..-the application hag bO" mad • provided -such use is I" e-orifppnity: with the provisions of t ho— rogulit tr*-lta. + C•ertifieate ot occupancy, shall state that MR bi• un.nor or prcno.eed sac of a bikldiag of land. complfea with all the building And health laws and c,- dinaneesiAnd with the provisions of these regdlatfots. A record of all certificates sh .11 be kept on file in the offal .of he Building Inspector anti coWs shu'l be furnishers, on re- nnest, 'to any persons having a I i- ronrietary o- tenancy interest in the hnilding affected. No hermit for excavation for anv hiilbl'ng shall be Issued before no- Plicat,t -n has been made for certifi- cate of necuranc;. SV C•TTON :11V. PLATS: :1.1 apnlic.itions for building per- -Its Rhall b± accompanied by a draw- Ins; or plat. in duplicate. showing the lot plan. the location of the buildine Ion the lot. accurate dimensions of building anil ' lot and such other in- '.,: iw,0on as may be nece..ssary to provide for tit-- enCorceriient o[ these res:uln► ions. 1 careful record of the I orieinal cOD•v of such apnlicatlona .,n•l Oats she;i he kept in th., ofnc,. of tine Ruiltling Tnsnector anti the tsnnlfente coi)y shall be kent nt the building at still times during con - structiem. SECTION' :<V. 7,0'XI- G AN- I) P1-- %'VNlNM: WARD- I. The 7.onin.; and Planning Rnanl nrovidoil for it Chapter 16671 (No. 71) Acts of Vorfda. 1931, and any and all future acts, shall perform the functions ind exercise the au- thority specffic:lly given them there- I in. I 2 The Zoninr and Planning Board :hall at its fist meeting after its anvointment se pct from its member- ship a Chairman olio shall preside at ail meeting:t attended by hfn: it ",'it-•,- Chairman -who shall pre ide in the ahfenre of the Chairman, ants a 0 Ja-yc•:nc ' „� =coatstned to w or. ' ; dinance. ar Wh"W'. ey deed e• . subdivisiton te pt slaloms of t)` is l�v .:,....'•+,ri_ itulatf�tns O. the other law .- ace o:• restrictions In any "1~ - * are more restrictive tha of this Ordinance. the other jW,VUON XIX. REPEAL. P pt•dinances or parts of ordi- 1 1n conduct nerewith or in- t with the provisions of thta are hereby repealed. 1.49MON XX. VALIDITY: Should any section. paragraph. sen- UnCe, phrase, clause or other part or provision of this ordinance be declared by the Court to be invalid. the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole. or any part •hereof, other than the part de- clared to be invalid. SECTION XXI. PENALTY: Any person. or persons, firm or corporation or association of persons. who shall violate or tall to comply with any of the terms or provisions of this ordinance shall, upon connip- tion in the Municipal Court, be tuned not exceeding the sum of Two Hun- dred Dolla -ss ($-200.00). or impris.:ned In the City Jail for not exceeding sixty (60) clays, or by both such fine and imprisonment in the diacre- tion of the Municipal Judge. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate of- fense. S F. C T I O N XXTI. EFP'F.0 a'IVE DATE: This Ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and its approval by a majority of the quel!- fied electors of the City of Clearwa- ter who are freeholders within said City voting a-i a regular or special Municipal F.loction called and held in such manner as the City Commis- sion may del ermine for the purpose of determinirg whether or not such Zoning Ordinance sh-ill go into effect. PASSED .kND ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Clear- water. Florida. on first reading- this da!- of - 1939. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Commission of the CRY of Clear- water. Florida. on second reading. this -- .lay. of , 1939. PASSFP AND ADOPTED by the wat r, Florida. ontthird�readin� his day of 1939. Attest: :1iaz or- Commissioner City autiftor and Clerk 5 v v�4- -ice D o � S n Q� f m � O w 4 lam` � .�. •, ��` ' �, .. ' ., � M .._ e � ' .. ,_ � r~- • `yloF 4A .T • • o O a � • 1404, c �9�CqtC z5.oO y at 2& AI tw - $ M+ L AVENTION SWI►l�'}�— °L w V CONC wAtj( _ MYRTLE AVE, MYRTLE AVE. R/ y� VA ERI S n 2 A m .Z) Z r= mg Z O ^ Y O ? �0 rn COA rn n C ...i O v ;o N �o a Pl C � A m p I LA M O ? rn rn COA rn n 1 N 5 1 N O r" � M. U . <� p -0 CD D D C O LA M G L 440 N 3 rr+J DD00(A Z � r Z � f*1 Z D�mmD n ~ in io D D D JI D D N ZZ O r O C O T l7N r- O Q 0 O D 0 II 11 A{ p 8 068 Z N L" (A 0 00 po U p p Q m N N N r* O 1 v rn r- 0 z z D D � 0 0 N ■ II 11 O -+ O w v N rrO < LO l7 r- II v to 0 A O N t rn n Z v � rn v O > D 0 rn -. JO D N Owl rn p D 0 rOn a V1 N tO 4 . �S2 • �i p p�N£LC . . . Ze R ` i �4�a• 10• t IN IETENT(ON m A 1 slr Z' 3. lg•,� v BOO/ -•� 5 r� 20.0x' a VALE r !. CONC WA" .t�.r'J PARKCt�iG I_s�1" Td fi:� iJ ►;.�EID � � c .: y 1 r _ MYF TLE AVE. MYRTLE AVE. R VARIES — g 0 N c $ m S 2 or 1 irT 0 A f qo ar o *�-_ � t1 r c V --I O m X r X O i gcA a n -0 � N X z �i � M. U . R e :1 -0 CD D D C O rn 3 DD00(A Z � r rri { >Dm � f*1 D�mmD in io irT 0 A f qo ar o *�-_ � t1 r c V --I O m X r X O i t � r � R e :1 -0 CD D D C O rn DD00(A N rri { >Dm � f*1 D�mmD in io D D D D (A co -1h. N co v N Cfl to -bb OODON Q 0 O n r� irT 0 A f qo ar o *�-_ � t1 r c V --I O m X r X O i 73 . :t O 40 0 �! 72 ' 2 o� o U o - co U) 80 7 ALL C IN I Cv � 6 AR co IOS 59.5 6.5 4' o 00 75 46.5 3 301 0 I1 JAJ io 153 I CE PERM"mm / I CITY 0 CLEARWATEq CERftno ram • raw smHaiRsr r I STY MAW NOTE: &MUNI c is OX t�k SOUTH Or THE PROP. Uht AS ESTABUSHM ,6(E-h�p��(�.l =/ r- J)o I 1 L------ --1 - -- --j swab• �I MW 01>�' - +, SEC 9 W 29S R6E, 115E �r w 7n)'v` - FEB p d Iggg PLANNING B DEVELOPMENT Sf"IV!CFS CITY Oi rLCAIAVATEn MW .fe"AMAW•CAP 9" . srr WA • pair awe . Ax" WA • AW CDC cowww AWARAW Y C • GKCtRAI� uTr • tASfIrHr7 AiOI . AlOrr a attr ii AQ srr . srr an AAGL . �1 ON at ? p, d G g- ffA4W= SASIV OW Mlty7 WIS' W At MW)W Ai£ f>IDYr W . AS tot Lin ENmay "TM • molt we tuner 4 c@nm � M "sm y uflo se Note Copies of Ude Surrey net D IONS C ACCOFAM TO a Not wMW �a�ow owpct io a a me norm" „yy ,oleo wmeaeew with µ� aonAt oTMOr a As tcoatom� ww sAlrtr s WMA Om1 ` kTr& A isii IV" A/»1e*e seal. A SURVEY OF LOT THE NORTH 126.00 FEET OF BLOCK E, JOS. J. ELDRIDGE'S SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK Ht . PAGE(S) 85 , OF THE PUBIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. i do further certify that the survey represented herew meets the moments of ' • Ft 'do Statutes 472.027 Chapter 61017 -6, Florida Administrative Code. Ronald L, "ughij P.L.S. No. 3747 C Cornerstone Ertg'ineerirtg dr" Slzrveying. rise. • EWMEERS • SURVEYORS • LAND PLANNERS #sr4 CLArrLAMO srwsrr. CLZAAWAMA. PAORMA 41016 PAT. 01&) 44T — /TI* OR IIe -1011 DATE Of RLH 9/12/1997 BOUNDARY SURVEY DRAWN BY: RLH CITY OF CLEARWATER DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARD VARIANCE STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: July 11, 19S6 AGENDA ITEM: Ct CASE s: VR 98.48 OWNERIAPPLICANT (BUSINESS)/REPRESENTATIVE: Helen Robinson/Tom Sehlhorst LEGAL DESCRIPTION: J. J. Eldridge Subdivision, north 71 feet of Block 'E', south 20 feet of the north 91 feet of Block 'E' less street on east, and the south 35 feet of the north 126 feet less street on east. LOCATION: Southwest comer of N. Myrtle Ave. and the Pinellas Trail EXISTING/PROPOSED USE: Vacant/busiress service ZONING: Cl (Inflll Commercial) vemeure oeMreaT NEWSPAPER AD: for the following variances: (1) a setback variance of 10 ft. to allow a buikfino zero rom the rear property line where a minimum setback of 10 ft. is required; 121 a lot area variance of 2,208 sq. ft. to allow an area of 5,292 aq. ft. where a minMwm of 7500 sq. ft. is required; (3) a lot depth variance of 58 ft. to allow a depth of 42 ft. where a minimum of 100 ft. Is required BOOM W J. J. Eldridge Subdivision, North o South . o. a North . of oc c E" less street on East and the South 35 ft. of the North 126 ft. less street on East, zoned Cl (Infill Commercial) yg,96-48. SURROUNDING LAND USES (Please refer to attached map for surrounding zoning districts): North: Vacant East: Single family residential South: Single family residential West: Pinellas Trail POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACTS ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: Generally compatible as proposed. OTHER REQUIRED REVIEWS/PUBLIC HEARINGS: None. STAFF ANALYSIS OF REQUEST: This props" Is currently vacant. The following three variances are requested to develop the property with a 1,608 square foot commercial building: o A 10 foot setback Is required from the rear property line. A variance is requested to allow construction of the building with no setback from the rear line. • The minimum lot area in this zone is 7,500 square feet. A variance is requested to allow development of this 5,292 square foot lot. • The minimum lot depth in this zone is 100 feet. A 58 foot variance is requested to allow development of this lot averaging 42 feet in depth. � au>tsri NAMi DE 1001N°) OPOfiED EEDED Structural setback. 10 feet/40.436(5)(a)(2) zero feet 10 feet from the rear (west) property line Lot area 7,500 sq. h.;40436(2)(b) 5,292 sq. ft. 2,208 sq. ft. Lot depth 100 feet/40.436(4) 42 feet 58 feet NEWSPAPER AD: for the following variances: (1) a setback variance of 10 ft. to allow a buikfino zero rom the rear property line where a minimum setback of 10 ft. is required; 121 a lot area variance of 2,208 sq. ft. to allow an area of 5,292 aq. ft. where a minMwm of 7500 sq. ft. is required; (3) a lot depth variance of 58 ft. to allow a depth of 42 ft. where a minimum of 100 ft. Is required BOOM W J. J. Eldridge Subdivision, North o South . o. a North . of oc c E" less street on East and the South 35 ft. of the North 126 ft. less street on East, zoned Cl (Infill Commercial) yg,96-48. SURROUNDING LAND USES (Please refer to attached map for surrounding zoning districts): North: Vacant East: Single family residential South: Single family residential West: Pinellas Trail POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACTS ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: Generally compatible as proposed. OTHER REQUIRED REVIEWS/PUBLIC HEARINGS: None. STAFF ANALYSIS OF REQUEST: This props" Is currently vacant. The following three variances are requested to develop the property with a 1,608 square foot commercial building: o A 10 foot setback Is required from the rear property line. A variance is requested to allow construction of the building with no setback from the rear line. • The minimum lot area in this zone is 7,500 square feet. A variance is requested to allow development of this 5,292 square foot lot. • The minimum lot depth in this zone is 100 feet. A 58 foot variance is requested to allow development of this lot averaging 42 feet in depth. VR 98.48 Page 2 Conditions tend to favor approval of the requested variances. In 1992, the Infill Commercial zoning district was created. The zone was applied to land along N. Fort Harrison Ave, and N. Myrtle Ave., inchxfing the N. Garden Ave. neighborhood lying in- between. The stated purpose for this zone Is to 'promote redevebpment of existing commercial and mixed use anus.' (Zoning Regulations, Sec. 40.431, General description.) Development of this lot Is difficult because the lot Is small and It has a peculiar configuration. The applicant has designed the building and parking to minimize the requested variances. Only 90 square feet of the building extends into the setback area and only a comer of the building Is without any setback from the rear property line. Approval of the requested variances will not significantly affect the Pinellas Trail which adjoins this property, nor will it affect other properties in this neighborhood. COMPLIANCE WITH APPROVAL STANDARDS (SEC. 45.24): Appears to comply with all standards for approval as proposed. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1) This variance Is based on the application for a variance and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps, plans, surveys, and other documents submitted in support of the applicant's request for a variance. Deviation from any of the above documents submitted in support of the request for a variance regarding the work to be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located or the site, will result in this variance being null and of no effect. 21 The requisite building parmit(s) shall be obtained within one year. ATTACHMENTS: None. PREVIOUS RELATED BOARD ACTIONS: None. OTHER DEPARTMENTICITIZEWOUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS: See attached comments from other reviewing City departments. NOTE: THIS REPORT IS A STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD MEMBERS AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A FINAL DECISION OF THIS CASE. A FINAL DECISION WILL BE MADE BY THE BOARD AT THE PUBIC HEARING ON THE DATE LISTED ABOVE. M — staff ranort NOT APPROVED DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARD CITY OF CLEARWATER July 24, 1997 Present: Otto Gans Chair Wilms gchwob Vice Chair Williarn ,mow Board Member Mark Jomatd Board Member Ron Stuart Board Member Richard Hull Assistant City Attorney John Richter Senior Planner Owen Loptes Board Reporter The medUp was called to order d 100 p.m. in City Hal. followed by the Invocation, Plodpe of Allegiance, mod" procedurn and explanation of the appeal process. To provide oontinulty for ressaroh, items are listed in agenda order although not necessarily disoussed In that order. B. Requests for Extension, Deferred and Continued Items B1. (Tine Exfw*kn Requeef) tills V. RobinsonlTom M. SehThorst for the followtrq velonoe: (1) a se"cit Variance of 10 R to allow • hAft zerc R from the mar property kw where a mk*nwn setback of 10 R lo required; (2) a lot ew vwWw of 2205 sq R b allow an area of &M sq it where a "**Mn of 7500 sq it is requirsd; and (3) a lot depth variance of 58 R to allow a depth 42 R *hero a minimum of 100 R is required at the SW oonw of K Myrtle Ave & Pinellas Trail. J.J. Eldridge Sub, North 711111 of Bilk E. South 20 R of the North 91,111 of Bilk E loss street on East and the South 35 R of the North 128 ft loss street on East. zooid CI (InNM Corr. VR 9648 In a letter dated July 7, 1997, the applicant requested a time wonston due to difficulties with the projed aueNp dMays In obte "the building Permit. Discussion ensued rogardlq reasons died for ter sAwA ns Member Jolwnson moved to grant a or* year time extension to July 11, 1998. The motion was duly seoondsd and oardW unwk sly. C. New Vartanoe Requests C1.Oro m Partr»nhiolJames O. i Marione B. Drove the structural setback variance requked to psrmR a detached sirpie hmRy dweilkq unit within the structural nd ack from a street fVt4 way (JewM Street), at 730 Bruoe Ave., MarxtMh► Sub�Bili 14, Lot 11. zoned R8 8 (Blglo Family ResldsntI4 V 97.40 Mr. Richter presented beciWou nd Information and written staff noornrrisrWrabo_ns, stettnp ter applicant wishes to demolish an exlotirq prop and construct: i `n W. �*@o %rn1y e..id.noe on tha sublect property. He detailed the location, lot confip idoori,; sibs Oonatralnts. ''1 S ................ ........... 01% 1 , - - - - -. � T\� lain r � h it g 3, .I 3; � � a 1 gloom? rR µ :mss ax •:� 5�� IA 7- -*4 & t * NN ON. It IL N-9 46 -�r six it :. 4 R IA � tl r7 � 4A. jo Tj 40 S J�l INA ik NL al IL 4 • .- CAL wi i 5 . r 0 'YRTL-L- ASE. co m b o tj qz' "j M pi .4 7- -*4 & t * NN ON. It IL N-9 46 -�r six it :. 4 R IA � tl r7 � 4A. jo Tj 40 S J�l INA ik NL al IL 4 • .- CAL wi i 5 . r 0 'YRTL-L- ASE. co ?x(21 /1L § 131.136 CLEARWATER CODE Sec. 131.136. Area and dimension regulations. Area and dimension regulations in CP districts are as follows: (1) Multi- family dwellings as regulated in RM -28 districts, not less than four (4) acres in area. (2) Commercial and other uses: a. Minimum lot area: Ten thousand (10,000) square feet. b. Minimum building setback: 1. Front and side street: Forty (40) feet. 2. Side: Twenty (20) feet. 3. Rear: Twenty (20) feet. c. Maximum building coverage: Forty -five (45) per cent. Maximum impermeable lot coverage: Seventy -five (75) per cent. d. Maximum height: Fifty (50) feet general, eighty (80) feet office building. (3) Special requirements applicable to all CP districts where the county land use plan designates an area under the residential/office /retail plan category shall be as follows: a. Residential and hotel /motel facilities are limited to fifteen (15) units per net acre; b. A maximum of fifty (50) per cent of the'site may be covered in impervious surface; and c. In the case of retail or office usage, a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of two- tenths (.2) may. be substituted for the restriction regarding impervious surface coverage. In this event the otherwise applicable, maximum impermeable surface coverage requirement of seventy -five (75) per cent shall apply. (Code 1962, App. A, § 22.04; Ord. No. 2293, § 19, 2 -5 -81; Ord. No. 3049, § 1, 4- 21 -83) Sec. 131.137. Fences and walls. Fences and walls in CP districts are regulated in section 131.205. (Code 1962, App. A, § 22.05) Sec. 131.138. Off - street parking. Off - street parking in CP districts is regulated in article V of this chapter. (Code 1962, App. A, §'22.07) Sec. 131.139. Off-street loading. Off - street loading in CP districts is regulated in article V of this chapter. (Code 1962, App. A, § 22.06) Division 20. CG General Business District Sec. 131.140. General description. The CG district permits apartment type development, retail and professional uses. (Code 1962, App. A, § 23.01)" Supp. No. 13 1142 BUILDING AND ZONING REGULATIONS' § P31'.1'4f Sec. 131.141. Permitted uses and structures. (a) The following are permitted uses and structures, hi. CG districts: (1) Multiple dwellings as regulated in RM -28', except ins conjunction with any commer- cial use of the property such multiple dwellings, shall' be ass regulated in RM -20 and that within the core CB.D, a ,density of thirty -four (34)) as ts> per net acre shall be allowed; (2) Townhouse development as regulated in section 131.198; (3) Hotels and motels- For density for core central business district; eighty -one. (81) hotel -motel units per set acre, forty -twc (42) hotel -motel units per net acre. otherw;is, %, (4) Financial institutions; (5) Retail stores and sales; (6) Eating and drinking establishments; PA4 i (7) Personal and business service establishments; ,t (8) Commercial job printing; (9) Repair service. for items. brought in by customers; -- 1 `' ' " '� " u c- p�� CZ } (10) Professional,, bu'sines& and trade sehc of ; ! . ;. (11) Research, design, and, deyel;opment activities and accessory laboratory where there is no heavy equipment used, no unreasonable noise; fumes, dirt, or dust created and all operation is within building and any incidental product that is manufactured is not for sale; (12) Public buildings; (13) Theaters, not drive -in and other cultural, entertainment uses; - 'Vz-,,' (14) Churches (as regulated in division 25 of this article and section 131.204); (15) Railway terminal and/or freight office; (16) Service stations . as regulated in section 131.202; (17) Lodges and private clubs; (18) Professional, business office. (b) "The entire area °occupied'by a secondary salvage or junk operation shall be screened by a continuous, attractive seventy -five (75) per cent opaque masonry, metal (not corrugated sheet metal or other roofing material), wood fence or wall, at a minimum of eight (8) feet in height. Such fence or wall shall be without openings, except for entrance and-, exit, which- opening- shall be equipped with opaque gates. Supplemental planting shall be required along the fence or wall on that portion abutting any street right -of- way. Reasonable care and maintenance shall be the responsibility of the property owner. (Code 1962, App. A, § 23.02;. Ord. No. 2039, § 18, 2- 21 -80) Supp. No. 14 1143 ° - § 131.142 CLEARWATER CODE Sec. 131.142. Special exceptions. The following are permitted in CG districts as regulated in sections 131.016 and 131.203: (1) Storage yards, when shielded from view from any public way (wall, solid fence and/or screen planting); (2) Transfer and storage establishments; -0 e °Wrs " I ' t (3) Certain fabricating processing and manufacturing conducted under following conditions: Such uses shall be so constructed, maintained and operated as not to be injurious or offensive to the occupants of adjacent premises by reason of the emission or creation of noise, vibration, smoke, dust or other particular matter, toxic or noxious waste materials, odors, fire and explosive hazard or glare. All processes and storage, except storage for vehicles, shall be in completely closed buildings; (4) Operations involving wholesaling, supply and distribution with or without warehousing, but not more than five thousand (5,000) square feet of storage area; (5) Service; renovation and repair establishments, business service establishments, including printing (when entirely within closed building); (6) Automotive body repair provided all operations are within an enclosed v structure; no vehicles needing repair to be stored. outside overnight, unless in an area completely_ screened from view by opaque fence or suitable planting; doors to face away from any residential zone; hours -of�� operation and conditional requirements of board of adjustment and appeal to be made of .record; (7) Salvage or junk operations only as an accessory and /or secondary use; (8) Single - family and duplexes :per RS -50 (single- family) or RM -12 (Duplex apartment) district standards respectively; (9) Commercial, express pick -up helicopter. stations, not involving helicopter landing (provided federal and state licensing provisions are met); (10) Vehicle /equipment sales and service; (11) Marina facilities, types B and C; (12) Customary home occupations; (13) Veterinary offices /animal hospitals; 1P.)) i Mwi- Do t^ I Idr (14) Commercial parking lots; s-,,, 7�) s 1&' (15) Level iI group care facilities. (Code 1962, App. A, § 23.03; Ord. No. 2039, § 18, 2- 21 -80; Ord. o. 2763, § 4, 8 -5 -82; Ord. No. 2896, § 5, 12 -9 -82; Ord. No. 3231, § 5, 11 -3 -83; Ord. No. 3234, § 3, 11 -3 -83; Ord. No. 3317, § 1, 1 -5 -84) Supp. No. 14 1144 § 131.038 CLEARWATER CODE Sec. 131.038. Area and dimension regulations. Area and dimension regulations in RS-60 districts are as follows: (1) Minimum lot area per dwelling unit: Sig thousand (6,000) square feet. (2) Minimum lot width at building setback line (interior lot): Sixty (60) feet. (3) Minimum lot width at building setback line (corner lot): Eighty (80) feet. (4) Minimum floor area per dwelling unit excluding porches, breezeways and garages: Nine hundred (900) square feet. �N (5) Minimum building setback from lot line: Front or Side Street cde Rear a. Main building 25' 6' 10' b. Accessory building 40' 6' 10' c. Swimming pool or enclosure 25' 6' 6' (6) Maximum building coverage: Forty (40) per cent. Maximum impermeable lot coverage: Sixty (60) per cent. (7) Maximum height: Two and one -half (2V2) stories and twenty -five (25) feet. (8) Maximum density: Seven and. three- tenths (7.3) dwelling units per net acre. (Code 1962, App. A, § 6.13; Ord. No. 2039, § 3, 2- 21 -80; Ord. No. 2293, § 5, 2 -5 -81) Sec. 131.039. Fences and walls. Fences and walls in RS -60 districts are regulated in section 131.205. (Code 1962, App. A, 16.14) Sec. 181.040. Oft - street parking. Off - street parking in RS -60 districts is regulated in article V of this chapter. (Code 1962, App. A, 16.15) Division 6. RS -50 Single- Family Residence District Sec. 131.041. General description. (a) An RS -50 district is created to provide for single - family residential development on fairly small lots. The maximum density of development in this district is eight and seven - tenths (8.7) dwelling units per net acre. Supp. No. 8 1108 Sec. 131.044. Area and dimension regulations. Area and dimension regulations in RS -50 districts are as follows: (1) Minimum lot area per dwelling unit: Five thousand (5,000) square feet. (2) Minimum lot width at building setback line (interior lot): ' Fifty (50) feet. (3) Minimum lot width at building setback line (corner lot): Eighty (80) feet- (4) Minimum floor area per dwelling unit excluding porches, breezeways and �p garages: Seven hundred fifty (750) feet. (5) Minimum building setback from lot line: • �Front � J or Side Street /Side Rear a. Main building 25' 5' 10' b. Accessory building 40' 5' 10' c. Swimming pool or enclosure 25' 5' 5' 3upp. No. 8 1109 BUILDING AND ZONING REGULATIONS 1131, 1 J (b) It is the intent that the application of an RS -50 district will generally require four (4) acres or more, except where used in a transitional circumstance separating a less restrictive zone district from a more restrictive zone district. Such exception shall be founded in the public interest. (Code 1962, App. A, § 7.01) Sec. 131.042. Permitted uses and structures. In an RS -50 district no premises or. building shall be used or occupied and no building shall be hereafter erected or structurally altered, unless otherwise provided, in this chapter, except for one or more of the following uses:. , -(1) One - family dwellings and. customary accessory uses; (2) Model homes as regulated in section 131.201; ' (3) Family care facilities as regulated in section 131.2056. (Code 1962, App. A, § 7.02; Ord. No. 2772, § 7A, 8- 19 -82) , Sec. 131.043. Special exception. The following is permitted as a special exception in an RS -50 district as regulated in iection 131.016: (1) Noncommercial off - street parking lots _(not operated as a separate business) or spaces on vacant lots or portions thereof for parking passenger motor vehicles. (2) Customary home occupations. , (3) Level I group care facilities as regulated in sections 131.016 and 131:2056. (Code 1962, App. A, § 7.03; Ord. No. 2039, § 4, 2- 21- 80;.Ord. No.,2288,..§ 6, 2- 19 -81; Ord. No. 2772, § 7B, 8- 19 -82) Sec. 131.044. Area and dimension regulations. Area and dimension regulations in RS -50 districts are as follows: (1) Minimum lot area per dwelling unit: Five thousand (5,000) square feet. (2) Minimum lot width at building setback line (interior lot): ' Fifty (50) feet. (3) Minimum lot width at building setback line (corner lot): Eighty (80) feet- (4) Minimum floor area per dwelling unit excluding porches, breezeways and �p garages: Seven hundred fifty (750) feet. (5) Minimum building setback from lot line: • �Front � J or Side Street /Side Rear a. Main building 25' 5' 10' b. Accessory building 40' 5' 10' c. Swimming pool or enclosure 25' 5' 5' 3upp. No. 8 1109 fi § 135.096 CLEARWATER, CODE Sec. 135.096. Establishment /contraction. It is intended that two (2) acres or more be provided to establish a new Neighborhood Commercial District and that no existing Neighborhood Commercial District be contracted to an area of less than two (2) acres, unless the city commission legislatively (by ordinance) determines that a reduced area is in the public interest. (Ord. No. 4035, § 2, 8- 29 -85) Sec. 135.097. Permitted uses. Within Neighborhood Commercial Districts, only the following uses (and structures de- signed for such uses) shall be permitted: (1) Indoor retail sales. (2) Personal services. (3) Restaurants. (4) Business/professional offices. (5) Funeral homes. (6) Attached dwellings. (7) Nonprofit.social or community services. (8) Multiple - family dwellings: " " (9) Townhouses. (10) Three - family dwellings. (11) Two- family dwellings. (12) Detached single - family, dwellings. (13) Family care. (14) Remote switching stations. (15) Accessory uses. (Ord. No. 4035, § 2, 8- 29 -85; Ord. No. 4846, § 1, 8- 17 -89) Sec. 135.098. Conditional uses. Within Neighborhood Commercial Districts, the following uses may be permitted as conditional uses: (1) Business services. (2) Alcoholic beverage sales (consumption on premises). (3) Alcoholic beverage sales (package sales). (4) Level I group care. (5) Level H group care. Supp. No. 36 1172 v 1 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE I § 135.100 (6) Level III group care. (7) Congregate care. (8) Child day care.. (9) Veterinary offices. (Ord. No. 4035, § 2, 8- 29 -85; Ord. No. 4605, § 1, 8 -4 -88) Sec. 135.099. Use limitations. (a) A convenience foodstore may include gasoline provided that gasoline dispensing units and islands are positioned at least fifteen (15) feet from all property lines, and provided that not more than eight (8) fueling spaces are provided, such fueling spaces to be outlined in paint. However, a convenience foodstore with gasoline sales may provide more than eight (8) fueling spaces with the approval of the planning and zoning board, which approval shall be obtained following the procedures for conditional uses. (b) All alcoholic beverage sales shall comply with the terms contained in chapter 136, section 136.024. (c) Multiple - family dwellings shall be governed by the dimensional and numerical devel- opment requirements of the Multiple - Family Residential "Sixteen" District contained in section 135.051 of this chapter. (d) Townhouses shall be governed by the dimensional and numerical development re- quirements contained in chapter 136, section 136.012. (e) Three - family dwellings shall be governed by the dimensional and numerical develop- ment requirements of the Multiple - Family Residential "Twelve" District contained in section 135.044 of this chapter. (f) Two- family dwellings shall be governed by, the dimensional and numerical develop- ment requirements of the Multiple - Family Residential "Twelve" District contained in section 135.043 of this. chapter.. (g) Detached single - family dwellings shall be governed by the dimensional and numerical development requirements of the Single - Family. Residential "Eight" District contained in section 135.029 of this chapter. (h) Family, group and congregate care facilities shall comply with all terms contained in chapter 136, section 136.020. (i) Accessory uses shall comply with all terms contained in chapter 136, section 136.008. 0) All uses, whether permitted, conditional or-nonconforming; shall be conducted in con- sonance with the use standards contained in chapter 136, section 136.005. (Ord. No. 4035, § 2, 8- 29 -85; Ord. No. 4888, § 1, 10 -5 -89) �i Sec. 135.100. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Neighborhood Commercial Districts not expressly regulated elsewhere: Supp. No. 37 1173 '« LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE § 135.029 1 (b) Accessory uses shall comply with all terms contained in chapter 136, section 136.008. (c) All uses, whether permitted, conditional or nonconforming, shall be conducted in consonance with the use standards contained in chapter 136, section 136.005. (Ord. No. 4035, § 2, 8- 29 -85) See. 135.029. Dimensional and numerical, development requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply, to all development within Single - Family Residential "Eight Districts: (1) Maximum density. Eight: (8) dwelling units per net acre. (2) Minimum lot area per dwelling unit: Five thousand (5,000) square feet. (3) Minimum lot width at setback line: a. Interior lots- Fifty (50),feet. b. Corner lots: Seventy (70) feet. (4) Minimum lot_ depth: a. Standard lots: Eighty (80) feet. b. Double frontage lots: One hundred ten (110) feet.. (5)` Mi_nimu.m setbacks: Each structure shall be subject to the following minimum set- backs, or to any greater setback requirements which may be applicable to a particu- lar property in accordance with the uniform development regulations contained in chapter 136. a. Principal and accessory structures: 1. From a street right -of -way: Twenty -five (25) feet. 2. From a side property line: Five (5) feet. 3. From a rear property line: Ten (10) feet. b. In- ground swimming pools and screened pool enclosures: 1. From a street right -of -way: Twenty -five (25) feet. 2. From a side property line: Five (5) feet. 3. From a rear property line: Five (5) feet. (6) Maximum height: Twenty -five (25) feet; except that such height limitation shall, where applicable, be increased or reduced in accord with the height bonus provisions, airport restrictions, and other regulations contained in chapter 136, section 136.004. (7) Maximum building coverage;. Forty -two (42) percent. (8) Minimum open space: a. For the lot: Thirty -five (35) percent of the lot area. b. For the front yard: Forty (40) per cent of the front*yard area. (Ord. No. 4035, § 2, 8- 29 -85; Ord. No. 4167, § 4, 6 -5 -86) Supp. No. 23 1141. ZONING ulations contained in chapter 42. Principal and accessory structures shall have the following minimum setbacks: (a) From a street right -of -way: Structures with a height of 20 feet or less shall have a required setback of 25 feet. Structures with a height greater than 20 feet shall have a required setback equal to 25 feet plus 25 percent of the height of the structure above 20 feet. (b) From a side property line: Structures with a height of 20 feet or less shall have a required. setback of 10 feet. Structures with a height greater than 20 feet shall have a required setback equal to 10 feet plus 25 percent of the height of the structure above 20 feet. (c) From a rear property line: Structures with a height of 20 feet or less shall have a required setback of 10 feet. Structures with a height greater than 20 feet shall have a required setback equal to 10 feet plus 25 percent of the height of the structure above 20 feet. (6) Maximum height: 50 feet.. This height shall, however, be increased by up to 30 feet where additional open space for the lot is provided in excess of the minimum speci- fied in subsection (7) of this section. Any development having such additional open space shall be permitted, in a linear pro- gression, a height of from 50 feet to 80 feet where, also in a linear progression, 15 percent to 30 percent of the lot is reserved as permanent open space. The height lim- itations contained in this subsection shall; where applicable, be further increased or reduced in accord with the height bonus provisions, airport restrictions, and other regulations contained in section 42.23. (7) Minimum open space: (a) For the lot: 15 percent of the lot area. (b) For the front yard: 50 percent of the front yard area. (8) Maximum floor area ratio: 0.4.. (9) Minimum building separation distance within a development: Each building within Supp. No. 14 of (Sl94 § 40.433 a development shall be separated from each other building within the same devel- opment by a distance equal to 40 percent of the sum of the heights of such 2 adjacent buildings, but in no case shall the separa- tion distance be less than 20 feet. (10) Maximum building coverage: 40 percent. (b) The following special dimensional and nu- merical development requirement shall apply to development within General Commercial Dis- tricts which are classified as residential/office/ retail or commercial limited on the comprehen- sive plan: (1) Maximum density: 18 dwelling units or 30 hotel/motel units per gross acre. (2) Reserved. (Code 1980, § 135.125; Ord. No. 5296 -92, § 2, 9- 16 -93) DIVISION 23. INFILL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (CI) Sec. 40.431. General description. This district is created to promote redevelop- ment of existing commercial and mixed use areas. (Ord. No. 5320 -92, § 1, 9- 16 -93) Sec. 40.432. Establishment/contraction. It is intended that four acres or more be pro- vided to establish a new Infill Commercial Dis- trict and that no existing Infill Commercial Dis- trict be contracted to an area of less than four acres, unless the city commission by ordinance determines that a reduced area is in the public interest. (Ord. No. 5320 -92, § 1, 9- 16 -93) Sec. 40.433. Permitted uses. Within infill commercial districts, only the fol- lowing uses (and structures designed to serve such uses) shall be permitted: (1) Multiple - family dwellings. (2) Indoor retail sales, except convenience stores. (3) Restaurants, except as provided in section 40.434. CD40:53 § 40.433 (4) Business/professional offices. (5) Medical chnics/laboratories. (6) Business services. (7) Personal services. CLEARWATER CODE (8) Nonprofit social or community services. (9) Commercial or trade schools. (10) Hotels/motels. (11) Accessory dwellings. (12) Interval .ownership and timeshare dwell- ings. (13) Remote switching stations. (14) Research facilities and laboratories. (15) Photographic processing facilities. (16) Printing and publishing facilities. (17) Production, of confectionery or baked goods. (18) Assembly of electronic components and pre- cision instruments. (19) Art galleries/studios. (20) Funeral homes. (21) Transportation stations. (22) Accessory dwellings. (23) Adult day care. (24) Accessory uses, including certain alcoholic beverage sales uses as specified in sections 41.071 and 41.072. (Ord. No. 5320 -92, § 1, 9- 16 -93; Ord. No. 5613 -94, § 1, 6- 16 -94; Ord. No. 5754 -95, § 9, 1- 19 -95; Ord. No. 5768 -95, § 1, 446 -95; Ord. No. 5806 -95, § 2) 5- 18 -95; Ord. No. 5889 -95, § 1, 2 -1 -96) Sec. 40.434. Conditional uses. (6) Marina facilities. (7) Residential shelters. (8) Noncommercial parking. (9) Manufacturing uses. (10) Outdoor retail sales. (11) Child day care. (12) Congregate care. (13) Vehicle sales. (14) Vehicle service. (15) Outdoor commercial recreation/entertain - ment. (16) Bed and breakfast inns. (17) Utility facilities. (18) Restaurants serving alcoholic beverages lo- cated within 200 feet of a church or a school or with outdoor seating where the service area is located within 200 feet of a residen- tial zone. (19) Convenience stores. (20) Indoor commercial recreation/entertain- went. (21). Gasoline stations. (22) Research and technology production uses. (23) Public safety facilities. (Ord. No. 5320 -92, § 1,9-16-93; Ord. No. 5562 -94, § 2, 5- 19 -94; Ord. No. 5754 -95, § 9, 1- 19 -95; Ord. No. 5768 -95, § 1, 4 -6 -95; Ord. No. 5889 -95, § 1, 2 -1 -96; Ord. No. 5972 -96, § 2, 6- 20 -96; Ord. No. 6044 -96, § 1, 7- 18 -96) Sec. 40.435. Use limitations. The following use limitations shall apply to infill commercial districts: Within infill commercial districts, the following uses may be allowed as conditional uses: (1) Indoor storage and/or warehousing. (2) Nightclubs, taverns and bars. (3) Package alcoholic beverage sales (package sales). (4) Veterinary offices. (5) Wholesaling /distributing. Supp. No. 14 CD40:54 (1) Alcoholic beverage sales shall comply with the applicable provisions of chapters 72 [6) and 136 [421. (2) Accessory uses shall comply with all terms contained in section 41.121. (3) Marina facilities shall be located only on waterfront property where conditional use approval for a commercial marina has been obtained for such property. ZONING § 40.436 (4) No operations or activities associated with any permitted use shall be conducted out- side any enclosed structures unless specif- ically permitted as a conditional use. (5) Any emissions into the atmosphere associ- ated with any use shall be odorless and colorless, and pose no risk to the health and safety of persons in the vicinity of the use. (6) Transportation stations shall have a con- tinuous, solid landscape buffer, attaining a minimum height of six feet at maturity, adjacent to all residentially zoned proper- ties. (7) All uses, whether permitted, conditional or nonconforming, shall be conducted in con- sonance with the use standards contained in sections 42.22, 42.31, 42.33 and 42.35. (8) The permitted and conditional uses al- lowed in this district shall be subject to the area threshold applicable to such uses as set forth in the Rules Concerning the Ad- ministration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as amended. (Ord. No. 5320 -92, § 1, 9- 16 -93; Ord. No. 5889 -95, § 1, 2 -1 -96; Ord. No. 6044 -96, § 1, 7- 18 -96) Sec. 40.436. Dimensional and numerical de- velopment requirements. The following dimensional and numerical re- quirements shall apply to development within Infill Commercial Districts: (1) Maximum density: 24 dwelling units or 40 hotel/motel units per gross acre. (2) Minimum lot area: (a) For multiple - family, outdoor storage and manufacturing uses: 30,000 square feet. (b) For other uses: 7,500 square feet. (3) Minimum lot width at setback line: 75 feet. (4) Minimum lot depth: 100 feet. (5) Minimum setbacks: Structures shall be af- forded setbacks which measure not less than hereinafter set forth, or less than any greater setback which may be applicable to Supp. No. 14 CD40:55 a particular property in accordance with the uniform development regulations con- tained in chapter 136. (a) Principal and accessory structures: 1. From a street right -of -way: Struc- tures with a height of 20 feet or less shall have a required setback of 15 feet. Structures with a height greater than 20 feet shall have a required setback equal to 20 feet plus 25 percent of the height of the structure above 20 feet. From a side or rear property line: Structures with a height of 20 feet or less shall have a required set- back of 10 feet. Structures with a height greater than 20 feet shall have a required setback equal to 10 feet plus 25 percent of the height of the structure above 20 feet. 3. From an adjoining residential zon- ing district (side and rear property lines only): Structures with a height of 20 feet or less shall have a required setback of 20 feet. Struc- tures with a height greater than 20 feet shall have a required set - back equal to 30 feet. (b) Reserved. (6) Maximum height: (a) For hotel/motel and residential uses: 50 feet. . (b) For other uses: 35 feet. (c) Such height limitations shall be increased or reduced in accordance with applicable height bonus provisions, airport restric- tions, and other regulations contained in section 136.004 [42.23). (7) Minimum open space: (a) For the lot: 25 percent of the lot area. (b) For the front yard: 50 percent of the front yard area. (8) Maximum floor area ratio: 0.4. § 40.436 CLEARWATER CODE (9) Minimum building separation distance within a development: Each building within a development shall be separated from each other building within the same development by a dis- tance equal to 40 percent of the sum of the heights of such two adjacent buildings, but in no case shall the separation distance be less than 20 feet. (10) Maximum building coverage: 30 percent. (Ord. No. 5320 -92, § 1, 9- 16 -93) DIVISION 24. HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL _-n DISTRICT (CH)�' Sec. 40.441. General description. The highway commercial district is created to reserve certain land areas for highway- oriented land uses. The permitted uses in this district include retail sales, professional and business offices, business services, hotels/motels, restau- rants, and commercial recreation. (Code 1980, § 135.126) Sec. 40.442. Establishment; contraction. It is intended that eight acres or more be provided to establish a new highway commercial district and that no existing highway commercial district be contracted to an area of less than eight acres, unless the city commission legislatively by ordinance determines that a reduced area is in the public interest. (Code 1980, § 135.127) Sec. 40.443. Permitted uses. Within highway commercial districts, only the following uses and structures designed for such uses shall be permitted: (1) Indoor retail sales; (2) Restaurants, except as provided in section 40.434. (3) Hotels/motels; (4) Medical clinics/laboratories; (5) Commercial or trade schools; (6) Indoor commercial recreation/entertain- ment; (7) Business services; (8) Personal services; (9) Gasoline stations; (10) Nonprofit social or community services; (11) Business/professional offices; (12) Interval ownership and timeshare dwell ings; (13) Remote switching stations; (14) Transportation stations; (15) Art galleries/studios; (16) Adult day care; (17) Accessory uses, including certain alcoholic beverage sales uses as specified in sections 41.071 and 41.072. (Code 1980, § 135.128; Ord. No. 5190, § 7, 5- 21 792;. Ord. No. 5754 -95, § 10,1- 19 -95; Ord. No. 5806 -95, § 2, 5- 18 -95; Ord. No. 5889 -95, § 1, 2 -1 -96) Sec. 40.444. Conditional uses. Within highway commercial districts, the fol- lowing uses may be allowed as conditional uses: (1) Recreation vehicle parks; (2) Nightclubs, taverns and bars; (3) Package alcoholic beverage sales (package sales);: (4) Animal grooming and/or boarding facili- ties; (5) Veterinary offices; (6) Indoor storage and/or warehousing; (7) Vehicle sales; (8) Vehicle service; (9) Wholesaling/distributing; (10) Outdoor commercial recreation/entertain - ment; (11) Outdoor retail sales, displays and/or stor- age; (12) Residential shelters; (13) Noncommercial parking; (14) Utility facilities; (15) Restaurants serving alcoholic beverages lo- cated within 200 feet of a church or a school Supp. No. 14 CD40:56 1• CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, April 17, 2007, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Penethia Mack is requesting Flexible Development approval for an existing detached dwelling within the Commercial (C) District on a parcel of land with a lot area of 2,070 sq ft (0.048 acres) and a lot width of 31 ft, with an existing building ht of 12 ft, an existing front (east) setback of 2.1 ft (to building), an existing front (west) setback of 30 ft (to building) and a proposed front (west) setback of zero ft (to pavement), an existing side (north) setback of 0.1 ft (to building) and a proposed side (north) setback of zero ft (to pavement), and an existing side (south) setback of 6.5 ft (to building) and a proposed side (south) setback of zero ft (to pavement) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Sec. 2 -704.0 of the Community Development Code. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling) at 1040 N. Myrtle Ave., Eldridge, J.J. Blk E, S 31 ft of N 157 ft of Lot 45 Less E 30 ft for Rd R/W. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, , Planner III. FLD2007 -02001 2. 302 -308 N Osceola Properties, LLC., Georgia Street Properties, LLC., & Triangle S A Land LLC. (Triangle Old Bay Holdings, LLC) are requesting Flexible Development approval of a 938 sq ft multi -use dock (observation pier) for a previously approved mixed -use development on the upland portion of the subject property, under the provisions of Sec. 3 -601 of the Community Development Code. (Proposed Use: Mixed -Use) at 410 N. Fort Harrison Ave., Lutz, Clovis C. Subtract A & B & Subm Land Deed #17377 & 10 ft Strip of Land Adj N & Subm Lands Deed #22859, Sec 09- 29 -15, M &B 43.06 & 43.04, Cate's A.B. & Jennie Sub Lots 1 -11 & Vac 10 ft Alley W of Lots 1 -3 together with Lots A & B & Subm Land 17705, 17484 & 178452. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2007 -02002 3. Harborage Condo Assn., Inc. is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of an existing 1,832 sq -ft multi -use dock by the addition of an 147 sq -ft dock for one slip on the north side with an increase to the permitted dock width from 75 % of the 290 -ft waterfront lot width (217.5 ft) to 87 % (252.5 ft) and a reduction to the required side (east) setback from 96.67 ft to 21.5 ft, under the provisions of Sec. 3 -601. (Proposed Use: Addition to an existing multi -use dock for one additional wet slip, in conjunction with existing attached dwellings [condominiums]) at 1651 Sand Key Estates Ct., Harborage, The Condo Bt Slip S No's 1 -14. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006 -11060 4. Alice H & Ronald P Nisk, THE are requesting to delete a condition of approval ( #8 on Development Order of Jan. 29, 2007) requiring an existing billboard to be removed prior to issuance of any permits and amend the conditions of approval. (Proposed Use: Automobile Service Station) at 205 & 213 N Belcher Rd., 2212 -2216 Drew St. & 2205 Norman Dr., Temple Terrace, 1" Add Blk D, Lots 1 & 2, Lot 30 & part of Lot 29 & Sec 07- 29 -16, M &B 33.12. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner H. FLD2006- 10058A Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4 -206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s /he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross - examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562 -4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758 -4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562 -4093 WITH THEHt REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http:// clearwater. granicus.com /ViewPubl'isher.php ?view id =11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 04/05/07 ' 'LUU / -ULUU 1'. 0 ALPHA & OMEGA INC ANDRIAN, JAMIE ATKINS, MAE K 2391 SUMATRAN WAY APT 7 HIXON, BETSY K 1759 26TH ST S CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1816 1860 VENETIAN POINT DR ST PETERSBURG FL 33712 - 2628 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1752 BAILEY, GLORIA E BLACKSTONE, JAMIE J ANDRIAN BRIGHT, WILLIAM E 814 JURGENS ST 1860 VENETIAN POINT DR BRIGHT, PARTHENIA A CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3109 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1752 909 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3025 BURGESS, WILLIE P BURTON, BARRY E C & B PROPERTIES OF BURGESS, VERNICE CLEARWATER 1006 RAILROAD AVE 1004 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 138 ORANGEWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3026 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7556 CALE, MARIE CAPSHAW, ANN M CASTRO, HUGO 801 PALM BLUFF ST 2180 CYPRESS POINT DR N 1620 BOYD RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3134 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2409 BLACKSTOCK SC 29014 - 8801 CHARLES, FRANKIE CHARLES, TORI CHURCH OF GOD BY FAITH 603 PALM BLUFF ST CHARLES, TIMOTHY 1007 N MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3054 1507 CEDAR ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3123 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 2813 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition CLEVELAND, CATHERINE L COBB, WILBERT Joe Evich, President COBB, LAURA 701 MARGO AVE P.O. Box 8204 1591 ROSEMONT DR Clearwater, FL 33758 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3835 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2149 COCKERHAM, DANIEL W CONNOLLY FAMILY LLC COOPER, PAUL 2699 SEVILLE BLVD # 803 PMB 305 809 ELDRIDGE ST CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 1153 809 E BLOOMINGDALE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4202 BRANDON FL 33511 - 8113 COOPER, ROSEMARY CRUDER, LORETTA Y DARLAGE, ETHEL 703 PALM BLUFF ST 904 BLANCHE B LITTLEJOHN T 1665 SANTA BARBARA DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3132 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3851 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 4212 DAVIS, ALLIE MAE ETHEL, AMNON EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE INC 911 N GARDEN AVE 121 MORTON ST APT 2A 1120 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3025 NEW YORK NY 10014 - 3317 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 GODWIN, ARTHONIA T THE GUY, ALBERT L GUY, ALBERT L 1895 MCCAULEY RD GUY, LINDA M GUY, LINDA M CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1512 1689 OAK PL 1689 OAK PL CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1351 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1351 Y' HAMILTON, JUANITA 906 VINE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4251 JONES, ELIJAH P JR 1424 BARBARA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2701 LINDSEY, JOSHUA A BAJSANSKI, ZARKO 432 3RD ST NW LARGO FL 33770 - 2474 MC KINNEY, HENRY T 8233 CRESCENT MOON DR NEW PRT RCHY FL 34655 - 3019 North Greenwood Association Jonathan Wade 1201 Douglas Road Clearwater, FL 33755 PALM BLUFF STREET LLC 855 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1204 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 HERIE, RAYMOND J 1201 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2427 JONES, GWENDOLYN EVANS, CASTELLA E 800 PALM BLUFF ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3133 MC DANIEL, BRIDGET R 603 S CEDAR ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3010 MOORE, CASSANDRA THE FORD FAMILY TRUST 305 N MARTIN L KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4406 Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Kathy Milam 1828 Venetian Point Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 Penethia Mack 1001 Mohawk St Clearwater, FL 33755 -1833 PONDS, BRENDA L 705 MARGO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3835 RESOLUTION PROPERTIES TRUST ROWELLS, CATHERINE R IN FISHER, CHARLES W 807 PALM BLUFF ST 4708 GRAINARY AVENUE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3134 TAMPA FL 33624 - 2106 SAND KEY AIRCRAFT & WATER SPOR 8620 CESSNA DR NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34654 - 5203 SEHLHORST, THOMAS M 1050 MYRTLE AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3122 HORNE, BARBARA 908 VINE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4251 JONES, HENRY EST 3542 BORING RD DECATUR GA 30034 - 4405 MC GILL, VIOLENE DANIEL, DEMERRIS 1109 1/2 GRANT ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2628 MOURA, ANTHONY"A 905 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3025 OUTLEY, LEVI 802 PALM BLUFF ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3133 PENZABENE, DAVID A LIVING TRUS 2280 BOW LN SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 2005 REISS, TODD 38170 N 1 STAVE SPRING GROVE IL 60081 - 9104 RUTLEDGE, CHARLES C JR RUTLEDGE, GELEATER 3456 FAIRFIELD TRL CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1111 SEYMOUR, JAMES E SR SEYMOUR, PEARLIE 807 N JEFFERSON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4318 SHACKELFORD, JAMES SHERMAN, MARTIN SHERMAN, MARTIN 1137 LASALLE ST SHERMAN, RHONDA RENEE SHERMAN, RHONDA RENEE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3234 3109 CARTER AVE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 602 MARINA DEL REY CA 90292 - CLEARWATER FL 33755 - f" SMITH, KATHLEEN MERTHIE, WILLIE M 810 JURGENS ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3109 SMOLARCHIK, GAD 1013 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3027 STEPHENS, JESSE PO BOX 1223 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 1223 THALER, JEFFREY G THALER, ZENITH 1808 SHERWOOD CIR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6412 TURNER, WILLIE J 706 PALM BLUFF ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3131 SMITH, MARY V 1003 VINE AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3158 SMOLARCHIK, GAD 6836 LOUBET ST FOREST HILLS NY 11375 - 5733 STONE, MARK A STONE, IRINA 709 MARGO ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3835 THOMAS, BRIAN D 1000 N MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3122 WILLIAMS, ALVIS F EST 816 JURGENS ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3109 SMITH, MARY W SMITH- PERNELL, MARIA D 1500 N MADISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2637 STARKER, MARY 1107 BLANCHE B LITTLEJOHN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3148 STRESS FREE INVESTMENTS INC 305 DR ML KING AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - TRUST # 907 PO BOX 186 LAKE WALES FL 33859 - 0186 WILLIAMS, BENEDICT WILLIAMS, JULIET 1564 GENTRY ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3520 WILLIAMS, ERIC D WYATT- CLARK, MARIE ZAGONENKO, ALEKSANDR 1007 N GARDEN AVE 4924 DUNNWOODY PL 1016 W 23RD ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3027 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 6335 VANCOUVER WA 98660 - 2333 LU LU J — EXISTING HOME 1040 N. MYRTLE AVE. 7-1 7-14 FLORIDA STRUCTURAL LOAD LIMITATIONS (FBC - 2004 Sect. 1603) FLOOR LIVE t.OAD: 40 PSF 30 PSF SLEEPING ROOMS ROOF LIVE LOAD: 20 PSF ROOF SNOW LOAD: NOT APPLICABLE WIND I,OAD: L. 13ASIC WIND SPEED- 2. WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR, Iw BUILDING CATEGORY = 3. WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY 4, ENCLOSURE CLASSIFICATION: INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT 5. COMPONENT& CLADDING ROOF: (10 SF) For ROOF ANGLE P roof= ZONE I ZONE 2 ZONE 3 OVE.RHiVNG ZONE 2 = OVERHANG ZONE 3 = WALL:, (WINDOWS DOORS) (10 SF) 11 wall=- -- ZONE 4 ZONE 5 END ZONE, WIDTH = a = 4 FEET SEISMIC LOAD: NOT APPLICABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE: 2,000 PSF -1 130 N411H 1.0 11 13 ENCLOSED 0.18 7 to 27 DEGREES 0 to 30 FEET 17.5 -2T8 17.5 -58. 7 17.5 -58.7 -56.6 -95.3 30.4 -33.0 30.4 -40.7 FRAMING WOOD - FUR NEW WORK ALL STRUCTURAL LUMBER SHALL BE MARKED ZSY �#i ALL WOOD IN DIRECT CONTACT" WITH MASONRY OR CONCRETE SMALL 13-F i"RE55URE-TREATED W1 AN APPROVED PRE 5ERVATIVic. PLYWOOD. ALL PLYWOOD SHEATHING SHALL BE APA RATED SHEATHING AND SHALL COMPLY WITH US PRODUCT STANDARD P51-95 LATEST EDITION. ALL HORIZONTAL PL 61,1 DIAPHRAGMS (I.E., ROOFS AND FLOORS SHALL BE LAID FACE GRAIN PERPENDICULAR TO J01517-1 C-IR�V7ffRS AND STAGGERED WITH THE JOISTS. FRAMING AROUND OPENINGS: TRIMMER 4 HEADER JOISTS SHALL BE DOUBLED, OR Of LUMBER OF t:1Y!,:VALENT CROSS SECTION, WHEN THE SPAN OF THE HEADER EXCEEDS 4FEET. THE ENDS OF HEAD,-.�_ - ' ')-3T- MORE THAN G'LONG SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY FRAMING ANCHORS OF JOISTS HANGERS UNL155 SEARING ON A BEAM, PARTITION OR WALL. PROVIDE 2X SOLID BLOCKING BETWEEN JOISTS * RAFTERS @ ALL SUPPORTS. BLOCKING SHALL BE ONE- PIECE * THE FULL DEPTH Of THE JOIST OR RAFTER. CUTTING * NOTCHING OF WOOD STUDS: IN EXTERIOR WALLS * BEARING PARTITIONS, ANY WOOD STUD MAY BE GL NOTCHED TO A DEPTH �N5. NOT EXCEEDING 25% Of THE WIDTH Of THE STUD. IN NON-BEARING FAKTITIC,; A ANY WOOD STUD MAY BE CUT OR NOTCHED TO A DEPTH NOT EXCEEDING 40% OF THE Wlgfel Of I'll" STUD. BORED HOLES IN WOOD STUDS: A HOLE NOT GREATER IN DIAMETER THAN 40% Of THE STUD WIDTH MAY 13E BORED IN ANY STUD. BORED HOLES NOT GREATER THAN GO% OF THE WIDTH Of THE T., LID A9f PERMITTED IN NON - BEARING PARTITIONS OR IN ANY WALL WHERE EACH BORED STUD 15 DOUBLED, PRCViDED NOT MORE THAN 2 SUCH SUCCESSIVE DOUBLED STUD ARE 50 BORED. IN NO CASE SHALL THE EDGE OF THE BOARD HOLE BE NEARER THAN 5/8" TO THE EDGE OF THE STUD. BOARD HOLES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED @ THE SAME SECTION OF STUD AS A CUT OR NOTCH. WALLS (NOT OTHERWISE BRACED BY PLYWOOD) SHALL BE BRACED Im NOT LE55 THAN I XG DIAGONAL LETAN5, A MINIMUM Of ONE EACH END OF EACH EXTERIOR WALL NOT TO fxcEED 25'-0" O.C. EACH BRACE SHALL COVER 4 STUDS 413E NAILED W1 (2) 5D NAILS @ FACH V.ND INTO THE TOP PLATE AND SILL * (2) 8D NAILS INTO EACH INTERSECTING STUD. USE DOUBLE STUDS UNDER ALL 4X * DOUBLE JOIST 5.13EAM5, * TRIPLE FR jD5 UNDER ALL GX * TRIPLE J015T BEAMS F �W 2004 Florida Existing Building Code 2004 Florida Building Code, Residential 2004 Florida Building Code, Mechanical 2004 Florida Building Code, Plumbing 2004 Florida Building Code, Fuel Gas 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code 2003 NFPA I - Uniform Fire Code 2003 NFPA 101 - Life Safety Code 2002 National Electric Code (NFPA 70) "-'005 SuPl)lements `005 SuPPlements 1%005 Supplements 70_'� __` Supplements '._,005 Supplements INDEX: SHEET SUBJECT COVER SHEff I - PROP05ED FLOOR PLAN. 2.- ffXi.5TING FLOOR PLAN, 3, DEMO! ITION PLAN. 4.- EX15TING FLOOR FRAMING PLAN. 5, EXISTING ROOF FRAMING PLAN. G, ELEVATIONS. 7.- ELEVATIONS. 8, ELECTRICAL LAYOUT. 9-- DETAILS � SECTIONS. IN LIEU OF IMPACT WINDOWS OR AN APPROVED SHUTTER SYSTEM, A PLYWOOD PANEL MUST BE MADE FOR EACH NEW WINDOW AND STORED ON SITE. THE PLYWOOD PANEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: MINIMUM THICKNESS: 7/1 G-1 MAXIMUM SPAN: 8' PANELS SHALL BE PRECUT TO COVER THE GLAZED OPENINGS WITH ATTACHMENT HARDWARE PROVIDED AND MARKED W1 DESIGNATION FOR EACH WINDOW 2 112" # G WOOD SCREWS WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF I G". WHERE SCREWS ARE ATTACHED TO MASONRY OR MASONRY/ STUCCO, THEY SHALL BE ATTACHED USING VIBRATION- RESISTANT ANCHORS HAVING A MINIMUM WITHDRAWAL CAPACITY Of 490 LB. DOORS MUST BE EQUALLY PROTECTED UNLESS ENGINEERED FOR WIND LOADS, INCLUDING FRENCH DOORS. AL WORK, MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION SMALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL EXTANT ORDINANCES. STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES, 05MA REGULATIONS, AND CODES IN FORCE BY REFERENCE, LATEST ADOPTED EDITIONS. THESE DRAWINGS ARE DONE IN COMPLIANCE TO THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES - EXISTING BUILDING WITH 2005 SUPPLEMENTS SHALL PROVIDE A CLEAR OPENING OF NOT LESS THAN 5.7 5Q. FT. NO LE55 THAN 20" WIDE. NO LE55 THAN 24" HIGH. THE BOTTOM Of THE OPENING SHALL BE NOT MORE THAN 44" ABOVE THE FLOOR. .1 m LU N B 1 RAMP EXISTING HOME 1040 N. MYRTLE AVE FRAMING WOOD - FOR NEW WORK_. ALL STRUCTURAL LUMBER SHALL BE MARKED AS SYP #2 ALL WOOD IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH MASONRY OR CONCRETE SHALL B!~ t'Rw55URE- TREATED W/ AN APPROVED PRE5ERVATIVff. PLYWOOD. ALL PLYWOOD SHEATHING SHALL BE APA RATED 5HEATHING AND SHALL. COMPLY WITH US PRODUCT STANDARD P51-95 LATEST EDITION. ALL HORIZONTAL PLY °J 0D DIAPHRAGMS (I.E., ROOFS AND FLOORS SHALL BE LAID FACE GRAIN PERPENDICULAR TO J0I517- c R ;: V7ffRS AND STAGGERED WITH THE JOISTS. FRAMING AROUND OPENINGS: TRIMMER 4 HEADER JOISTS SHALL BE DOUBLED, OR OF LUMBER OF t:::!.s:e:ALEtTf CROSS SECTION, WHEN THE SPAN OF THE HEADER EXCEEDS 4FEET. THE ENDS OF HEADa':� *- -')-3TS MORE THAN G' LONG SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY FRAMING ANCHORS OF JOISTS HANGERS UNL155 5EARING ON A BEAM, PARTITION OR WALL. PROVIDE 2X SOLID BLOCKING BETWEEN JOISTS 4 RAFTERS @ ALL SUPPORTS. BLOCKING SHALL BE ONE - PIECE 4 THE FULL DEPTH OF THE J015T OR RAFTER. CUTTING 4 NOTCHING OF WOOD STUDS: IN EXTERIOR WALLS 4 BEARING PARTITIONS, ANY WOOD STUD MAY BE G' n- Oil NOTCHED TO A DEPTH NOT EXCEEDING 25% OF THE WIDTH OF THE STUD. IN NON - BEARING F'AKTITIC;N5, ANY WOOD STUD MAY BE CUT OR NOTCHED TO A DEPTH NOT EXCEEDING 40% OF THE WlI7t H Of I'll" STUD. BORED HOLES IN WOOD STUDS: A HOLE NOT GREATER IN DIAMETER THAN 40% OF THE STUD WIDTH MAY 13E BORED IN ANY STUD. BORED HOLES NOT GREATER THAN GOB% OF THE WIDTH OF THE 5., LID AB:E PERMITTED IN NON - BEARING PARTITIONS OR IN ANY WALL WHERE EACH BORED STUD IS DOUBLED, PRCVEDED NOT MORE THAN 2 SUCH SUCCESSIVE DOUBLED STUD ARE 50 BORED. IN NO CASE SHALL THE EDGE OF THE BOARD HOLE BE NEARER THAN 5/8" TO THE EDGE OF THE STUD. BOARD HOLES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED @ THE SAME SECTION OF STUD AS A CUT OR NOTCH. WALLS (NOT OTHERWISE BRACED BY PLYWOOD) SHALL BE BRACED wl NOT LE55 THAN I XG DIAGONAL LETAN5, A MINIMUM OF ONE EACH END OF EACH EXTERIOR WALL NOT TO F5Ct ED 25' -O" O.C. EACH BRACE SHALL. COVER 4 STUDS 413E NAILED W! (2) 8D NAILS @ FACH V.ND INTO THE TOP PLATE AND SILL 4 (2) 8D NAILS INTO EACH INTERSECTING STUD. USE DOUBLE STUDS UNDER ALL 4X 4 DOUBLE JOIST5.BEAM5, 4 TR[PLE F R jD5 UNDER ALL GX 4 TRIPLE J015T BEAMS 1 1 FLORIDA STRUCTURAL LOAD LIMITATIONS (FBC - 2004 Sect. 1603) FLOOR LIVE t.OAD: 40 PSF 30 PSF SLEEPING ROOMS ROOF L[V[' [.OAI): 20 PSF ROOF SNOW LOAD: NOT APPLICABLE WIND LOAD: L. 13ASIC: WIND SPEED- 2. WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR, Iw = BUILDING CATEGORY = 3. WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY 4. ENCLOSURE CLASSIFICATION: !N1T:RNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT= 5. COMPONENT & CLADDING ROOF: (10 SF) For ROOF ANGLE, = H- P roof-= ZONE I ZONE 2= ZONE: 3 OVE.RILANG ZONE 2 = OVERHANG ZONE 3 = WALL:, (WINDOWS DOORS) (10 SF) P wall=- r '.ONE 4 -- "ZONE 5= END "Z,ONt WIDTH =a= 4 FEET SEISMIC LOAD: NOT APPLICABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE: 2.000 PSF 130 MPH 1.0 II 43 ENCLOSED +t- 0.18 7 to 27 DEGREES CODES 0 to 30 FEET - 17.5 17.5 -27.8 2004 Florida Existing Building Code ;:`.305 Supplements 17.5 -,58. 7 2004 Florida Building Code, Residential 12005 Supplements 17.5 -58.7 2004 Florida Building Code, Mechanical 1 %005 Supplements -56.6 2004 Florida Building Code, Plumbing ;70 3 Supplements -95.3 2004 Florida Building Code, Fuel Gas '.,005 Supplements 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code 30.4 -33.0 2003 NFPA 1 - Uniform Fire Code 30.4 -40.7 2003 NFPA 101 - Life Safety Code 2002 National Electric Code (NFPA 70) Construction: Type V - IF Occupancy: R -3 Residential Occupant Load: 1 person per ','00 SF INDEX: SHEET 5U13JECT COVER Si1Eff I.- PROP05ED FLOOR FLAN. 2.- EXi.5TING FLOOR FLAN, 3.- DEMOLITION PLAN. 4.- I~X15TING FLOOR FRAMING PLAN. 5.- EXISTING ROOF FRAMING PLAN. G.- ELEVATION5. 7.- ELEVATION5. 8.- ELECTRICAL LAYOUT. 9.- DETAIL5 � SECTIONS. ENCL05ED STRUCTURE NOTES: IN LIEU OF IMPACT WINDOWS OR AN APPROVED SHUTTER SYSTEM, A PLYWOOD PANEL MUST BE MADE FOR EACH NEW WINDOW AND STORED ON SITE. THE PLYWOOD PANEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: MINIMUM THICKNESS: 7/1 G" MAXIMUM SPAN: 8' PANELS SHALL BE PRECUT TO COVER THE GLAZED OPENINGS WITH ATTACHMENT HARDWARE PROVIDED AND MARKED W/ DESIGNATION FOR EACH WINDOW 2 112" # G WOOD SCREWS WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF I G ". WHERE SCREWS ARE ATTACHED TO MASONRY OR MASONRY/ STUCCO, THEY SHALL BE ATTACHED USING VIBRATION- RESISTANT ANCHORS HAVING A MINIMUM WITHDRAWAL CAPACITY OF 490 LB. DOORS MUST BE EQUALLY PROTECTED UNLESS ENGINEERED FOR WIND LOADS, INCLUDING FRENCH DOORS. 15UILDINGCODE_ REQUIREMENTS AL WORK, MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL EXTANT ORDINANCES. STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES, OSHA REGULATIONS, AND CODES IN FORCE BY REFERENCE, LATEST ADOPTED EDITIONS. j THESE DRAWINGS ARE DONE IN COMPLIANCE TO THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODES - EXISTING BUILDING WITH 2005 SUPPLEMENTS SHALL PROVIDE A CLEAR OPENING OF NOT LESS THAN 5.7 5Q. FT. NO L.E55 THAN 20" WIDE. NO L.E55 THAN 24" HIGH. THE BOTTOM OF THE OPENING SHALL BE NOT MORE THAN 44" ABOVE THE FLOOR. William J. McCann, P.l 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E °. Clearwater, FL 33755 Fel: 727-461-5500 Fax: 727- 461 -5502 Project # 06136 1• l 1; i 1 +, t 1" elm c 1 f 1 11-511 I ° -�i' 1_ 1° -311 121 -411 I 41 -811 � C3 j z .,.. r .y r LA N 3 4• 0 14 1- 11 e °•� Tel: 727 -461 -5500 ® 4 tiX �Flor`icia E.E. +icon �t€Sg252 � � q1 -Pyll 2' -461 3'-4" 21 -4ll 31- 11 3141 41 -011 � a ma�y// n�n 2'411x4'41 2'4 1lX4`41 z Uj N h W •fn1 X71 N N _ N 26�� 1 11 N .. • N W 3" STEF DOWN! cv 2'411x4'411 iv iy cat N UVIN 5EDROOM Q - � N � `i" _ AIR HANDLER O x AtSOYE - - nl NON STUCTUR L U -. _ - KNEEWALL TO REMOVED BE 4 ' N i n -(� 7 O ®s C4 Q EnO KITCHEN CNI fl' -�Ir 111 -i�" fV � i!1 Eli 21411x41411 2t4ux41411 11 -511 I_21 °411 -11 -311 12' -4ll I 44" i � C3 j z .,.. r .y r LA N 3 1 • 1 t • 1 4• 0 Clearwater, FL, 33755 e °•� Tel: 727 -461 -5500 ® 4 tiX �Flor`icia E.E. +icon �t€Sg252 � � iad > pa b9♦ � a ma�y// n�n z Uj N Uj 1 • 1 t • 1 William J. McCann, P.E. t ' 4• Clearwater, FL, 33755 e °•� Tel: 727 -461 -5500 Fax: 727 -461 -5502 tiX �Flor`icia E.E. +icon �t€Sg252 � m iad > pa b9♦ � a ma�y// n�n William J. McCann, P.E. t ' 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E :1 Clearwater, FL, 33755 e °•� Tel: 727 -461 -5500 Fax: 727 -461 -5502 Project # �Flor`icia E.E. +icon �t€Sg252 ��y�i 0, — rov i- r rrr- William J. McCann, P.E. U d ® Tel: 727- 461 -5500 � N tzl � 1 � � i 1 c r 1. T lu Z lu N Q 111 QL O AC a William J. McCann, P.E. U d Tel: 727- 461 -5500 � w � 1 � � i 1 c 1 1. William J. McCann, P.E. U d Tel: 727- 461 -5500 � w \ A T William J. McCann, P.E. 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E Clearwater, FL 33755 Tel: 727- 461 -5500 Fax:727- 461 -5502 Project # 06136 llFl4ri6p.E. c6fi a #_50252: FILL cml,I BOOO P; cONC. AND swim (THIS PIER ONLY) REMOVE AND REPLACE ALL 1/2" PLY DECKING AND REPLACE WITH 5 " CDX. NAILED W/ Sd'S� 4" E.N. &" F N EXIST, 2X8 P.T. JOIST MAY VARY DUE TO GRADE SLOPE CONDITIONS CN O 0 ro 11 EXIST, NG LC)OR r7=-RAM NG PLA'N- SCALE: 3/16" = 1' -0" d 4 ti4 � Clearwater, FL 33755 Tel: 727 - 461 -5500 Fax: 727- 461 Q �! 6L� -55021 Z A LU W- Q Q z �a e ® N z 01 ~ (L iii W William J. McCann, P.E m u Clearwater, FL 33755 Tel: 727 - 461 -5500 Fax: 727- 461 Q �! 6L� -55021 Project # 06136 FloridSRI.YTic6&W� 50252' 4 �a e id- William J. McCann, P.E m 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E Clearwater, FL 33755 Tel: 727 - 461 -5500 Fax: 727- 461 Q �! 6L� -55021 Project # 06136 FloridSRI.YTic6&W� 50252' GASLE END----c- HC-10 EACH ROOF RAFT I I— UM- rr:x STING William J. McCann, F.E. 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E Clearwater, EL 33755 Tel: 727-461-5500 Fax: 727-461-5502 Project# 06136 r7; [Florl-URE, License"# 50252 tu z \CIEme d) cl William J. McCann, F.E. 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E Clearwater, EL 33755 Tel: 727-461-5500 Fax: 727-461-5502 Project# 06136 r7; [Florl-URE, License"# 50252 rx, 'At JU U FMwF 1L1 1 _ EXIST_ �i171NrK 1112 SLOPE Q ' (Y_ A • r � ` U 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E T lu Tel: 727- 461 -5500 �1 } F orida P.R:Licerlse #:50252 Project # 06136 ® 4 =V ��§.' Pep g k �&aaQ'•. U iP� .F_ C�V r JU U FMwF 1L1 1 _ EXIST_ �i171NrK 1112 SLOPE Q ' (Y_ A • r � ` U William J. McCann, P.E :. 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E lu Tel: 727- 461 -5500 �1 } F orida P.R:Licerlse #:50252 Project # 06136 (a% =V ��§.' Pep g k �&aaQ'•. U iP� .F_ William J. McCann, P.E :. 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E Clearwater, FL 33755 Tel: 727- 461 -5500 ` t "w Fax: 727-461-5502 F orida P.R:Licerlse #:50252 Project # 06136 12 4 REMOVE ALL EXIST, SIDING AND REPLACE • • as lu William J. McCann, P.E. 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E Clearwater, FL 33755 Tel: 727-461-5500 Fax: 727-461-5502 Proiect# 06136 Florida P. Licenk 4 50252 EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLES A 911imm FELT PAPER OVER EXISTING CLAPBOARD SIDING 0 ION 5 TYPICAL WALL Mp DBL TOP PLATE SYP BTM, PLATE LU/ (2) 106 EA JOIST (2) 2x6 W1 1/2" PLY AWIM NA11;=0 W1 ROWS SECTION E UPLIFT TRANSFER AT WALL OPNG'5 "Ilk LU > 1.14 z tq z William J. McCann, P.E: 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E Clearwater, FL 33755 Uj cl V lC 0 Fax: 727-461-5502 c1q Project # 06136 Flolr`i—&P.E. riith§6 4 50252 7Z z 1.14' d z a > %5 z IL p: U4 C, V d) 7 Z 00' Kr- dam LU W- 3 ERG IV 1151, 2/7R2ll 6 6 lo L F. LU > 1.14 z tq William J. McCann, P.E: 1428 Gulf To Bay Blvd, Suite E Clearwater, FL 33755 Tel: 727-461-5500 Fax: 727-461-5502 Project # 06136 Flolr`i—&P.E. riith§6 4 50252